Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09/24/15
Thursday, September 24, 2015 7:00 PM Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Council Chambers City Council Mayor Carolyn Petty Mayor Pro Tem Hany Fangary Councilmembers Michael DiVirgilio Peter Tucker Adjourned Regular Meeting Agenda Study Session - 6:00pm (Community Choice Aggregation) Adjourned Regular Meeting - 7:00pm Executive Team Viki Copeland, Finance Director Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director David Lantzer, Fire Chief Bob Blackwood, Interim Human Resource Manager Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Sharon Papa, Police Chief City Clerk Elaine Doerfling City Treasurer Karen Nowicki City Attorney Mike Jenkins Tom Bakaly, City Manager September 24, 2015City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Agenda 6:00 P.M. – STUDY SESSION AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL STUDY SESSION 1.REPORT 15-0697 COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION (CCA) (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris) LACBOS SEPT 8 CCA MOTION.pdf Los Angeles County CCA Motion CCA Non Disclosure Agreement.pdf City of Lancaster Proposal Attachments: PUBLIC COMMENT ADJOURNMENT OF STUDY SESSION Page 2 Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015 September 24, 2015City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Agenda 7:00 P.M. - REGULAR AGENDA All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. City Council agenda packets are available for your review on the City's website located at www.hermosabch.org. Complete agenda packets are also available for public inspection in the Police Department, Hermosa Beach Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer or you can access the packet at our website, www.hermosabch.org, on your laptop, tablet or smartphone through the wireless signal available in the City Council chambers: Network ID: City Council Password: chb13 Written materials pertaining to matters listed on the agenda of a regular City Council meeting must be submitted by noon of the Tuesday before the meeting in order to be included in the agenda packet (tentative future agendas can be found as Item 2c in every regular agenda packet). However, written materials received after that deadline will nonetheless be posted under the relevant agenda item on the City's website at the same time as they are distributed to the City Council by email and provided to the City Council and the public at the meeting. Written materials may be sent to the City Manager's office at anny@hermosabch.org. The City Manager's office makes every effort to add supplemental items to the online agenda up to the time of the meeting but in some cases, supplemental items submitted after 2:00 p.m. on the meeting date may not be added to the online agenda until the day after the meeting. Persons who wish to address an issue of general nature (not pertaining to matters listed on the agenda) to the City Council for the official record may submit written material to the Council in lieu of or in addition to speaking under the Public Participation section of the meeting. Such written correspondence must be delivered to the City Clerk's office (cityclerk@hermosabch.org) or the City Manager's office (anny@hermosabch.org) by noon of the Tuesday before the regular Council meeting in order to be included on the agenda. Emails to the City Council may be sent to citycouncil@hermosabch.org To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices (ALD) will be available for check out at the meeting. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, you must call or submit your request in writing to the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0203 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Page 3 Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015 September 24, 2015City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Agenda CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION REPORT ANNOUNCEMENTS PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda as a business item. 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction not on this agenda, on items on this agenda as to which public comment will not be taken (Miscellaneous Items and Reports – City Manager and Other Matters), or to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar. Public comments on the agenda items called Miscellaneous Reports and Other Matters will only be heard at this time. Comments on public hearing items are heard only during the public hearing. Members of the audience may also speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; and, 3) during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters. Comments from the public are limited to three minutes per speaker. The City Council acknowledges receipt of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters raised in written communications. The Council may take action to schedule issues raised in oral and written communications for a future agenda. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. a)REPORT 15-0677 LETTER FROM JAMES HAUSLE DATED SEPTEMBER 3, 2015 REGARDING MARCH 3RD INCIDENT Recommendation:To receive and file the written communication from James Hausle. Letter from James Hausle.pdfAttachments: b)REPORT 15-0678 LETTER FROM JACKIE TAGLIAFERRO DATED SEPTEMBER 3, 2015 REGARDING MARCH 3RD INCIDENT Recommendation:To receive and file the written communication from Jackie Tagliaferro. Page 4 Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015 September 24, 2015City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Agenda Letter from Jackie Tagliaferro.pdfAttachments: c)REPORT 15-0686 LETTER FROM MARIANO ALVAREZ DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 AND FOLLOW UP LETTER AND ATTACHMENTS DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 REGARDING OCEAN TIRE VIOLATIONS Recommendation:To receive and file the written communication from Mariano Alvarez. Letters and Attachments from Mariano Alvarez.pdfAttachments: 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 4, with public comment permitted at that time. a)REPORT 15-0699 APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Recommendation:It is recommended that the City Council approve the following minutes: 1. Regular Meeting of July 8, 2014 2. Regular Meeting of July 22, 2014 3. Adjourned Regular Meeting of July 29, 2014 4. Adjourned Regular Meeting of August 26, 2014 070814 Reg Mtg draft min 072214 CC reg mtg draft min 072914 CC Adj Reg Mtg draft min 082614 Adj Reg CC draft min-study Attachments: b)REPORT 15-0674 CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommendation:To ratify the following check registers. 09-03-15 9-10-15 9-10-15a Attachments: c)REPORT 15-0679 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Recommendation:To receive and file the tentative future agenda items. Tentative Future Agenda.docAttachments: d)REPORT 15-0689 PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:To receive and file the Planning Commission tentative future agenda items. Planning Commission Tentative 10-20-15 Agenda.pdfAttachments: Page 5 Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015 September 24, 2015City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Agenda e)REPORT 15-0687 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS FOR JULY 2015 (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommendation:To receive and file the July 2015 Financial Reports. July 2015 Revenue Status Report July 2015 Expenditure Status Report Attachments: f)REPORT 15-0672 CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Recommendation:To receive and file the July, 2015 Treasurer's Report and Cash Balance Report. July'15 Treasurer Report .pdf July 15 Cash Balances Report.pdf Attachments: g)REPORT 15-0683 CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Recommendation:To approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. h)REPORT 15-0691 ACTION SHEET OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:To receive and file the action sheet of the Planning Commission meeting of September 15, 2015. Planning Commission Action Sheet 9-15-15.docAttachments: i)REPORT 15-0649 APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $296,530 WITH AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TO PROVIDE PLANNING SERVICES FOR THE STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT PROPOSED BY BOLOUR ASSOCIATES (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:Approve a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $296,530 with Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. to prepare an Environmental Impact Report and to provide planning services for the Strand and Pier Hotel Project proposed by Bolour Associates. AMEC Professional Agreement- 10 percent contingency AmecFW_HermosaPier&StrandHotelEIR_Final Consultant Proposals Summary of Estimated Budgets Attachments: j)REPORT 15-0668 REAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FROM 2014-15 TO 2015-16, REVENUE REVISIONS RELATED TO THE REAPPROPRIATIONS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Page 6 Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015 September 24, 2015City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Agenda Recommendation:It is recommended that the City Council reappropriate amounts in the attached Exhibit A to the FY 2015-16 budget and approve revenue revisions in the attached Exhibit B related to the reappropriations. Totals by fund are highlighted in the attachments. The General Fund amount is $669,492. Budget Reappropriation from 2014-15 revised, v3 2015 Revenue Related to Budget Reappropriations, Final Attachments: k)REPORT 15-0684 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE RESOLUTIONS (City Manager Tom Bakaly) Recommendation:It is recommended that the City Council support the four resolutions introduced by the League of California Cities Annual Conference and provide direction to the voting delegate, Councilmember Peter Tucker, to vote YES on all four resolutions at the League Annual Business Meeting. League of CA Cities Annual Conference 2015 - Resolutions Packet.pdfAttachments: l)REPORT 15-0670 APPROVE AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE SKECHERS DESIGN CENTER AND EXECUTIVE OFFICES PROJECT INCLUSIVE OF A PROPOSED OFFICE PROJECT IN MANHATTAN BEACH (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:Approve an amendment making changes to the Professional Services Agreement with Rincon Consultants, Inc., originally approved by Council on January 27, 2015, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Skechers Design Center and Executive Officers Project to include additional offices proposed in Manhattan Beach. SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9-24-15 Exhibit A to 2nd Amendment to Professional Services Agreement Attachments: m)REPORT 15-0673 PROJECT STATUS REPORT AS OF AUGUST 31, 2015 (Public Works Director Andrew Brozyna) Recommendation:To receive and file the Project Status Report as of August 31, 2015. CIP Project Summary AUG 2015Attachments: 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. a)REPORT 15-0675 REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF THE PLANNING Page 7 Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015 September 24, 2015City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Agenda COMMISSION DECISION TO REVOKE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ON-SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 1332 HERMOSA AVENUE (THE ESTABLISHMENT) (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:The Planning Commission voted 3:2 to revoke the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) based on continuing non-compliance with their requirement to provide quarterly certified audits of the food sales ratios. Staff Recommended Alternatives: Staff recommends the following alternatives to revocation: 1. Direct staff to return with a resolution to modify the CUP conditions in a manner that further ensures bona fide restaurant use rather than nightclub/bar activities such as reduced hours of operation or reduced hours for live entertainment, prohibitions of live entertainment, or reduction of the number of televisions/video displays. 2. Direct staff to return with a resolution to modify Condition 3, which requires the applicant to submit quarterly records of food and alcohol sales audited by a Certified Public Accountant, and instead bring this Condition into alignment with recent code updates that make food sales ratio checks only an issue when other code enforcement issues exist. 1. P.C. Resolution 15-17.pdf 2. Planning Commission 5-19-15 Minutes and Staff Report.pdf 3. Approved CUP, Resolution No. C.C. 08-6617.pdf 4. Approved CUP Floor Plan, Resolution No. C.C. 12-6780.pdf 5. Letter from Landlord's Agent, Dated May 12, 2015.pdf 6. Photos of 1332 Hermosa Avenue, May 2015.pdf 7. CUP Review - Planning Commission Minutes and Staff Report.pdf 8. Enforcement Officer Report.pdf 9. Correspondence regarding 50-50 Audit Assessment.pdf 10. Updated HBMC Sections 17.04.050, 17.40.080 and 17.70.010.pdf 11. Radius Map and Legal Posting.pdf 12. Correspondences.pdf Attachments: 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a)REPORT 15-0688 REPORT REGARDING INVESTIGATION OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT INTERACTION WITH CHRIS MILLER ON MARCH 3, 2015 IN FRONT OF THE STANDING ROOM, RELATED RESPONSE AND POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS (City Manager Tom Bakaly) Page 8 Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015 September 24, 2015City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Agenda Recommendation:The City Council should review, evaluate and give direction as necessary relating to the results of the March 3, 2015 investigation, the release of the March 3, 2015 video tape, other issues related to March 3, 2015 investigation and events and discuss process improvements for moving forward. August 25, 2015 Staff Report.pdf March 3, 2015 Synopsis of Evidence.pdf Apology to Community - City Manager and Police Chief.pdf Public Records Request Process Improvements - Flow Chart.pdf Attachments: b)REPORT 15-0696 CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OR SPECIAL ELECTION TO FILL THE CURRENT VACANCY ON THE CITY COUNCIL (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Recommendation:It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Consider the following alternatives for filling the City Council vacancy resulting from Nanette Barragan's resignation: a. Appoint a qualified person to serve the remainder of Ms. Barragan's unexpired term; b. Call a special election to fill the vacancy; or c. Enact an ordinance to authorize an interim appointment until a special election is held to fill the vacancy for the remainder of the term. 2. Decide this evening which option is preferable, and direct the City Clerk to return with the documents necessary to implement that option - final action must occur within 60 days of the vacancy (by November 2, 2015). c)REPORT 15-0690 COMMUNITY POLICE ADVISORY BOARD UPDATE (Police Chief Sharon Papa) Recommendation:It is recommended that City Council confirm staff moving forward with the Community Police Advisory Board. d)REPORT 15-0698 DIRECTION REGARDING THE CITY’S NOTICE PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES/EVENTS AS NEEDED (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:Affirm that public noticing for public meetings, events, and activities continue to be a high priority consistent with City goals, affirming support of current practices of providing notice both as required by law, and as a general courtesy prior to City Council and Commission decisions, and prior to events or public construction projects. Direct that departments include the full cost of noticing in the upcoming user fee study for all city services where noticing is required or desired, including but not limited to pending decisions on private applications for development projects, certain private construction activities, and privately sponsored events. Alternatively the Council may want to provide direction on any specific concerns about noticing practice that warrants further evaluation. Matrix of Public Noticing (Comm. Dev. Dept.) Planning Commission 9-15-15 Staff Report CC 7-28-15 Staff Report - Public Noticing 6c_1_Matrix of Public Noticing (Comm. Dev. Dept.) SUPPLEMENTAL Letter from Jeff Miller submitted by Councilman Fangary (added 7-28-15 at 1pm) Attachments: Page 9 Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015 September 24, 2015City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Agenda e)REPORT 15-0676 APPOINTMENT OF CITY MANAGER COMPENSATION NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE (City Attorney Mike Jenkins) Recommendation:The City Council select two of its members to serve as an ad hoc negotiating committee to negotiate with the City Manager as necessary in connection with consideration of his 2015 bonus and 2016 compensation. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER NONE 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a)REPORT 15-0682 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS - SEPTEMBER 2015 (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Recommendation:It is recommended that the Council: (1) appoint committee delegates and alternates; (2) adopt the attached resolution if SBCCOG delegate/alternate changes are made; (3) add and/or delete any temporary subcommittees, as deemed appropriate; and (4) approve the list of committee assignments, as amended this evening. Committee List CommitteeInformation SBCCOG 2015 Reso Attachments: b)REPORT 15-0685 VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - UNEXPIRED TERM - PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION - SCHEDULE INTERVIEWS (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Recommendation:It is recommended that the City Council schedule a meeting at 5:30 p.m. October 27, 2015, for the purpose of interviewing Public Works Commission applicants to fill the unexpired term ending October 31, 2018. PW apps - Sep 2015Attachments: 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items. No discussion or debate of these requests shall be undertaken; the sole action is whether to schedule the item for consideration on a future agenda. No public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's strategic plan and work plan when considering new items. NONE ADJOURNMENT Page 10 Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015 September 24, 2015City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Agenda FUTURE MEETINGS AND CITY HOLIDAYS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS: October 13, 2015 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, and 7:00 PM - City Council Meeting October 27, 2015 - Tuesday - 5:30 PM - Public Works Commission Applicant Interviews, 6:00 PM - Study Session (Street Paving and Gould Ave), and 7:00 PM - City Council Meeting November 10, 2015 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - City Council Meeting November 24, 2015 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session (Quarterly Litigation Update), and 7:00 PM - City Council Meeting December 8, 2015 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - City Council Meeting December 22, 2015 - Tuesday - No Meeting BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS: October 6, 2015 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting October 20, 2015 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting November 2, 2015 - Monday - 7:00 PM - Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission Meeting November 17, 2015 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting November 18, 2015 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting December 1, 2015 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting December 2, 2015 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting CITY OFFICES CLOSED FRIDAY-SUNDAY AND ON THE FOLLOWING DAYS: November 11, 2015 - Wednesday - Veteran's Day November 25, 2015 - Thursday - Thanksgiving Day January 18, 2016 - Monday - Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday February 15, 2016 - Monday - President's Day May 30, 2016 - Monday - Memorial Day July 4, 2016 - Monday - Independence Day September 5, 2016 - Monday - Labor Day November 24, 2016 - Thursday - Thanksgiving Day Page 11 Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015 Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0697 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Study Session of September 24, 2015 COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION (CCA) (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris) Summary: Staff proposes the City pursue both the Los Angeles County and Lancaster CCA models simultaneously in the initial start-up phase and that staff return to council with a contract with Lancaster for $77,000. The City is committed to participating in the regional collaboration through South Bay Clean Power while expediting the implementation of CCA for the City of Hermosa Beach. Background: On February 24th 2015 City Council adopted the Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan and adopted a goal to be carbon neutral as a municipality by 2020. The Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan recommends the City of Hermosa Beach pursue Community Choice Aggregation (CCA), which can leverage buying power to offer 100% renewable zero-emissions power to all electricity accounts in Hermosa Beach, starting in 2017. Staff have been exploring alternatives for purchasing power through Community Choice Aggregation. In November 2014, The City of Hermosa Beach was the first city to sign the non-binding, no-cost resolution to participate in a Community Choice Aggregation feasibility study through South Bay Clean Power. Since this time, ten other cities have signed the feasibility study resolution including Torrance, Carson, Redondo Beach, Santa Monica, Manhattan Beach, Beverly Hills, West Hollywood, Palos Verdes Estates, Lomita and Malibu. On March 17, 2015, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors instructed the Internal Service Department’s (ISD) County Office of Sustainability (COS) to look into the feasibility of establishing Community Choice Aggregation in the County of Los Angeles, and to submit a written report back to the Board of Supervisors. The Director of ISD submitted the requested report (CCA Report) On June 24, 2015. The CCA Report highlights the many potentially significant financial and environmental benefits of CCAs to Los Angeles County and its residents. Because CCAs are non-profit entities, they are able to provide their customers with less- expensive energy than for-profit investor-owned Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 6 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0697 utilities. Moreover, CCAs may choose to provide power that is greener than that of investor-owned utilities, who are currently required to provide 20 percent green energy, rising to 33 percent by 2020. Additionally, CCAs can, through their rate structure and incentives programs, encourage customers to install renewable energy-producing infrastructure on-site by compensating customers for power that they return to the grid. Thus, CCAs can be a win-win for communities they serve by providing cleaner, less expensive electricity. On September 15th 2015, the County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to move forward with the LA County CCA Feasibility Study and utilize up to $300,000 to hire a Community Choice Aggregation consultant to conduct a preliminary technical analysis on the feasibility of establishing a CCA program for the County’s unincorporated areas, with potential expansion to other local entities (Attachment 1). South Bay Clean Power is one of the local entities expected to be included in this feasibility study. Simultaneously, On April 22, 2015 staff, elected officials and community members visited the City of Lancaster to learn about their carbon reduction and clean technology initiatives and Lancaster Clean Energy. Lancaster Clean Energy is the first Community Choice Power program in Los Angeles County and the first to work with Southern California Edison. At this meeting the two cities expressed interest in working together in the future. Following this visit, staff met with the City of Lancaster Manager and Deputy City Manager to learn more about Lancaster Clean Energy and discuss the potential for Hermosa Beach to join the Clean Energy CCA. Staff believes that the two CCA models are not mutually exclusive and that both programs can be pursued concurrently at this time. Staff are currently assessing the opportunities and limitations of components of each Community Choice Aggregation alternative for supporting the City’s goals of achieving municipal Carbon Neutrality by 2020, maintaining a low-cost to implementation, providing community benefits, and reinvestment opportunities for local programs. Analysis: REVIEWING AND EVALUATING CCA OPTIONS The City of Hermosa Beach has set an ambitious goal to achieve carbon neutrality by 2020 for municipal facilities and operations. Although a goal for the community carbon emissions has not been established, the draft General Plan for a Low-Carbon Future will likely recommend 2040 as a goal. Community Choice Aggregation has the potential to significantly reduce community emissions by up to 41% according the GHG Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report for an Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan (2015). The City is concurrently exploring two opportunities for implementing Community Choice Aggregation Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 2 of 6 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0697 in Hermosa Beach: (1) the Los Angeles County CCA model, and (2) Lancaster Choice Energy CCA model. A description of each model is provided below including an assessment of the potential opportunities and limitations (Table 1). Los Angeles County CCA The Los Angeles County model proposes to follow the Marin Clean Energy (MCE) model. The Marin County Board of Supervisors took initial steps in 2008 to create Marin Clean Energy, conducted the technical analysis to confirm the viability of MCE’s business model and after a successful launch and program operations, expanded to other local entities. The motion approved by Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on September 15, 2015 directs staff to proceed with the Community Choice Aggregation analysis using this model. The County has requested interested cities sign a declaration to pursue CCA (Attachment 2) and a non-disclosure agreement to obtain load data for each city (Attachment 3). Cities are required to pay for the cost of obtaining this data and will be added into the feasibility analysis as their data is submitted. The City of Hermosa Beach has submitted these forms and will continue to work with South Bay Clean Power through this process and submit the data request to SCE. Under this model the City would have a representative on the decision-making committee, however, the details are still unclear at the time of this report. The motion does not establish a timeframe for when this CCA could be expanded and implemented in the other local entities. This ambiguity in the timeframe is concerning to the City of Hermosa Beach that would like to actually implement a CCA program (beyond a feasibility study) by 2017. Moreover, the City of Hermosa Beach is a geographically small City in Los Angeles County and will not have the power and autonomy to determine rate structures in the Los Angeles County/ South Bay Clean Power model. The City’s energy infrastructure and generation potential is markedly different from neighboring City’s such as Torrance and Carson which may result in conflicting interests for power procurement. An advantage of continuing to pursue this model are opportunities to increase local renewable energy production and local job creation, as well as regional collaboration and participation. Lancaster Choice Energy CCA In the Lancaster Choice Energy CCA model, a JPA has been created (California Clean Energy Authority [CCEA]) between the City of Lancaster and the City of San Jacinto, with the Lancaster City Council serving as the Board of Directors. These two Cities are considered the “Original Members” and will receive no additional benefit other than that which is contracted for by any associate member Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 3 of 6 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0697 agencies. The Board of Directors will serve as the legislative and operational oversight of the corresponding contractual relationships with associate member agencies. This structure will allow each member agency to benefit from the knowledge and experience Lancaster has gained without ceding control to the JPA. Under this scenario, the City would become an associate member of the JPA and that membership would be governed by a corresponding agreement which lays out each member’s responsibilities, costs, and obligations. Each associate member contract will have unique qualities that allow each City to tailor their relationship to be most beneficial and most appropriate for that City. The CCEA will then contract with the City of Lancaster to perform an agreed upon scope of work for the Associate Member Agency. Being that each contract is unique, each City may choose which services are important, which can be done in house, and which should be performed under the CCEA. Following the meeting with Lancaster’s Manager and Deputy City Manager, staff requested a scope of work and budget for joining the JPA which would include a feasibility similar to that conducted by the Los Angeles County (Attachment 4). The Lancaster model provides an expedited feasibility assessment phase of 6-months at a cost to the City of $77,000 which would allow the City to immediately implement a CCA program on completion of the study. This model allows the City to determine a rate structure based on the cost of procuring renewable energy and generate revenue that could be used to finance energy efficiency programs for Hermosa Beach. Specifically, there is the potential to increase the credit for residential solar systems and city-wide solar installation incentives. Furthermore, data generated from the Hermosa Beach program could be used as a case-study to inform the County program. For example, Lancaster currently provides an option of 100% renewable energy to its customers for an additional $10 month above the SCE rate and generates approximately 13% revenue which is used to sponsor City-wide events which promote the CCA. Numerous scenarios can be modeled at the implementation phase to determine a rate which both incentivizes participation and provides revenue for reinvestment. Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 4 of 6 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0697 Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 5 of 6 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0697 Recommendations and Fiscal Implications: Staff proposes the City pursue both the Los Angeles County and Lancaster CCA models simultaneously in the initial start-up phase. The City is committed to participating in the regional collaboration through South Bay Clean Power while expediting the implementation of CCA for the City of Hermosa Beach. Staff recommends Council contract with the City of Lancaster to complete the Phase one scope of work that includes: •Preparation and Formation of the Ordinance •Development of Organizational Structure •Load Data Requests •Load Forecasting, Data Analysis, and Pro-forma Development •Implementation Plan Document Preparation •Administrative and Clerical Expense The contract amount of $77,000 will be covered by a transfer from Prospective to a newly established division. At the completion of Phase One scope of work the City could decide to move forward with the implementing the CCA (Phase 2), to participate in the Los Angeles County model, or both. A benefit of this approach is the City of Hermosa Beach would be seen as taking a highly-visible climate action step and the lessons learned from the assessment can assist and inform the County CCA model as it expands to other local entities. Attachments: 1. Los Angeles County CCA Motion 2. Declaration to pursue Los Angeles CCA 3. Non-disclosure agreement to obtain load data 4. City of Lancaster Proposal Respectfully Submitted by: Kristy Morris, Environmental Analyst Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 6 of 6 powered by Legistar™ MOTION SOLIS __________________________ RIDLEY-THOMAS __________________________ KUEHL __________________________ KNABE __________________________ ANTONOVICH __________________________ AGN. NO.____ MOTION BY SUPERVISORS DON KNABE AND SHEILA KUEHL September 8, 2015 In recent months, ten cities in the South Bay and Westside have adopted resolutions in support of establishing Community Choice Aggregation (CCA), including Torrance, Carson, Redondo Beach, Santa Monica, Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach, Beverly Hills, West Hollywood, Palos Verdes Estates and Lomita. The Counties of Santa Barbara, Ventura and Orange have also recently expressed interest in CCAs. On March 17, 2015, the Board instructed the Internal Service Department’s (ISD) County Office of Sustainability (COS) to look into the feasibility of establishing Community Choice Aggregation in the County of Los Angeles, and to submit a written report back to the Board of Supervisors. On June 24, 2015, the Director of ISD submitted the requested report (CCA Report). The California legislature adopted Community Choice Aggregation legislation in 2002 that set forth the process by which cities and counties in California can form nonprofit entities that purchase electricity from wholesale power generators on behalf of their communities. A CCA replaces the existing, investor-owned utilities (e.g., Southern California Edison, Pacific Gas & Electricity) in obtaining electricity and designing retail --MORE-- electricity rates for end-use customers. A CCA relies upon existing electric distribution infrastructure managed by investor-owned utilities to transport electricity to customers. Under the terms of the enabling legislation, the CCA becomes the de facto electricity provider for the community’s residents: all customers are transitioned into the CCA and must opt out to remain with the investor-owned utility. The CCA Report highlights the many potentially significant financial and environmental benefits of CCAs to Los Angeles County and its residents. Because CCAs are non-profit entities, they are able to provide their customers with less- expensive energy than for-profit investor-owned utilities. Moreover, CCAs may choose to provide power that is greener than that of investor-owned utilities, who are currently required to provide 20 percent green energy, rising to 33 percent by 2020. Additionally, CCAs can, through their rate structure and incentives programs, encourage customers to install renewable energy-producing infrastructure on-site by compensating customers for power that they return to the grid. Thus, CCAs can be a win-win for communities they serve by providing cleaner, less expensive electricity. The CCA Report summarizes the programmatically and financially successful experiences of Marin County and Sonoma County in establishing their CCAs, known as Marin Clean Energy (MCE) and Sonoma Clean Power (SCP), respectively. Marin Clean Energy was established in 2010 and initially served 8,100 customers. After its full first year of operation, MCE paid off its loan for pre-launch costs, and saw positive change in net revenue from year to year, all while offering its customers greener electricity at rates that were in most instances cheaper than those offered by the existing investor-owned utility. MCE has since grown to include Napa County and the City of Richmond, and now serves 125,000 customers-as MCE’s success has gained --MORE-- the attention of neighboring communities, more and more of them are petitioning to join the CCA. Sonoma Clean Power became the second CCA in California when it launched in 2014. After incurring debt during its first year to cover start-up costs, SCP’s revenues from the sale of electricity have grown substantially, and SCP expects to fully recover its start-up costs within the first few years of operation. Like Marin Clean Energy, Sonoma Clean Power offers its customers electricity that is cheaper and comprised of a higher percentage of renewable energy than the existing investor-owned utility. Closer to home, the City of Lancaster is in the final stages of launching its own CCA, known as Lancaster Community Energy (LCE), with expected service to residential customers scheduled for 2016. The Lancaster CCA anticipates that its power will be greener and cheaper than that provided by Southern California Edison. The experiences of Marin, Sonoma, and Lancaster show that CCAs are a viable option for local governments to provide cleaner energy at rates that are nearly always less expensive than the rates offered by the existing investor-owned utility. The Marin Clean Energy example, in particular, holds promise as a potential development, implementation and expansion model for the County. The Marin County Board of Supervisors took initial steps in 2008 to create Marin Clean Energy, conducted the technical analysis to confirm the viability of MCE’s business model and after a successful launch and program operations, expanded to other local entities. Los Angeles County should now proceed with our Community Choice Aggregation analysis using this model. --MORE-- WE, THEREFORE, MOVE that the Board of Supervisors instruct the Interim Chief Executive Officer and the Director of the Internal Services Department to: 1. Utilize up to $300,000 from the ISD’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2015-2016 Final Changes Budget to hire a Community Choice Aggregation consultant through ISD’s Energy Support Services Master Agreement (ESSMA), who shall conduct a preliminary technical analysis on the feasibility of establishing a CCA program for the County’s unincorporated areas, with potential expansion to other local entities. 2. Submit a written report to the Board of Supervisors by February 1, 2016 that includes: a. A preliminary technical analysis of the feasibility of establishing a CCA in the County’s unincorporated areas, including the costs (start-up, short- term and long-term), benefits, and risks to the County. b. An analysis of the financial viability of a local CCA, including an assessment of (i) energy supplies required for all customer classes (residential, commercial, industrial users) and (ii) the availability of sufficient green energy supplies. c. A preliminary analysis that compares end-user monthly rates across rate classes and levels of green energy desired between a CCA and Southern California Edison, our local investor-owned utility. d. Key decision points, next steps and issues that the Board of Supervisors must consider before making a decision to move forward with the formation of a Los Angeles County CCA, including options for financing start-up and initial operational costs, a proposed governance structure, --MORE-- potential green energy and rate tiers and planning, implementation and rollout timelines. 3. Delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer or the Director of the Internal Services Department, or their respective designees, to execute agreements and documents, in standard forms pre-approved by the California Public Utility Commission and/or Southern California Edison, for the purposes of acquiring, utilizing, storing and protecting the confidentiality of energy consumption data needed to perform the CCA technical analyses. WE, FURTHER, MOVE that the Board of Supervisors instruct the Interim Chief Executive Officer and the Interim Director of ISD to create, lead, and convene regular meetings of a new Community Choice Aggregation Implementation Workgroup comprised of County representatives, representatives from other jurisdictions that have shown interest in joining a County CCA program, representatives from organized labor, and other stakeholders, in order to: a. Assess the feasibility of other jurisdictions joining a County CCA program; b. Provide information and guidance to other jurisdictions on the potential timeline and necessary steps to join a County CCA. c. Determine if a County CCA can advance workforce training and hiring objectives that align with County goals. The Interim CEO and the Director of ISD should provide bi-monthly reports to the Board of Supervisors on the status of the preliminary technical analysis and the deliberations of the Task Force until the final CCA Technical Analysis Report is submitted to the Board. # # # DK:SK:ms:kk:ky DECLARATION BY MAYOR OR CHIEF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REGARDING PURSUIT OR IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION SERVICE I, ______________________________ [name], state as follows: 1. I am the mayor or chief county administrator of ________________________________ [name of city or county]. 2. I am authorized to make this declaration on behalf of ________________________________, a city, or county, which is investigating, pursuing or implementing community choice aggregation as a community choice aggregator as defined by Section 331.1 of the California Public Utilities Code. 3. I understand that all of the confidential information provided by Southern California Edison Company to ___________________________ (city or county) is subject to the terms and conditions of the Nondisclosure Agreement between these two entities and is provided for the sole purpose of enabling _________________________ (city or county) to investigate, pursue or implement community choice aggregation under Section 366.2 of the California Public Utilities Code. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this ____ day of ____________, ___________, at _________________, _______________ (city, state). [signature] ____________________________________ ڤ ڤ Rev 12/06 Form 14-770 Proposal – City of Hermosa Beach Submitted by the City of Lancaster This proposal is being submitted in consideration of the City of Hermosa Beach’s intention to join the California Clean Energy Authority. 7/29/2015 CONFIDENTIAL 1 Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................. 2 CCA Model Background ........................................................................................................................ 3 Hybrid JPA Model................................................................................................................................... 3 Proposal for Formation of Work ............................................................................................................... 5 Structure and Function .............................................................................................................................. 7 Project Team ............................................................................................................................................... 8 2 Background Lancaster Mayor R. Rex Parris has led a comprehensive effort to implement renewable energy throughout the City of Lancaster in an effort to preserve our environment and protect our local air quality, with the ultimate goal of becoming the nation's first net-zero electricity city. Following a long and steadily increasing series of successful renewable energy projects in Lancaster, ranging from residential rooftop solar programs and energy storage to utility-scale solar developments, Lancaster Choice Energy (LCE) is the latest step in the City's quest to reach net-zero status. The mission to establish LCE officially began on May 13, 2014, when the Lancaster City Council approved the implementation plan which outlined the City’s intent to establish a Community Choice Aggregator (CCA). A month later, the approved plan was submitted to the CPUC for review and certification, making LCE the first CCA in Southern California Edison (SCE) territory. As of May 2015, LCE began buying and selling energy for its first phase customers which included more than 850 municipal accounts as well as residents and businesses that elected to enroll early in the program. LCE will extend services to all 55,000 electric accounts citywide in October 2015. The Lancaster City Council is the local authority with jurisdiction over LCE. The City Council’s primary duties include establishing LCE policies, reviewing and approving resource plans and proposed rate changes, establishing commissions, committees and/or sub-committees to oversee and advise LCE operational activities and providing policy direction to the City Manager, who will have general accountability for LCE operations, consistent with the policies established by the City Council. The Lancaster City Manager and Deputy City Manager are accountable for overseeing LCE and ensuring compliance with the City Council approved implementation plan and other City policies. LCE operations utilize a combination of internal City staff and contractors. Certain specialized functions needed for LCE operations, namely the electric supply and customer account management, are performed by experienced and qualified third-party Electricity Service Providers (ESPs). The LCE Director, who reports to the City Manager and Deputy City Manager, is responsible for oversight of the daily operational and finance aspects of LCE; and provides direction to LCE staff members and works collaboratively with third-party ESPs. Internal LCE staff members include an Energy Manager specializes in regulatory functions, power procurement, short and long term resource planning and energy contracts; another Energy Manager specializes in marketing and branding, energy efficiency program development and customer relationship management; and an IT/Customer Care Manager who interfaces with SCE and Noble America to ensure that customer data transfers accurately. Additional staff includes a Senior Projects Coordinator whose focus is community outreach and marketing and a Projects Assistant who serves as the LCE customer care and billing specialist. LCE contracts with four ESPs to carry out specialized functions needed for LCE operations. Pacific Energy Advisors (PEA) works with LCE staff on a variety of LCE functions including power procurement, load forecasting and CCA regulations. Direct Energy procures power on behalf of LCE and keeps staff abreast of the circumstances that may impact energy procurement costs. Noble America provides back office support for LCE including a customer call center; they also process all customer data transferred from SCE. Braun, Blaising, McLaughlin, & Smith provides 3 legal advisement and represents LCE in any legal proceedings held before the Public Utilities Commission. CCA Model Background To date, there have been two types of CCA’s formed in California. The first is the Marin and Sonoma County models in which a regional entity took the initiative to organize a JPA for the purpose of creating a regional CCA. The other is a stand-alone City CCA. In this case, the only operational City CCA in California is the City of Lancaster. Other models have been presented by private firms that look and act similar to a franchise system. This proposal does not intend to cast a negative light on any of the existing models but rather pose an alternative to the current opportunities. There are strengths and weaknesses to all of these approaches. In the regional JPA model, each member City when becoming a member receives one voting position on the respective board, and must submit control to the collective group of members. In exchange, the JPA provides all the service, and takes all the risk. This scenario has proven very effective in situations where like-minded cities and like-minded areas pool their resources and attributes to make the group stronger. In the stand alone City model, the City assumes all the responsibilities and roles, in addition to all the risks. However, the City retains all control of the rate setting, operation, and operational revenues. This allows opportunities to tailor programs, and benefit from the continuing revenue stream as a community. The difficulty in this program is the amount of time and energy it takes to gain the required experience and expertise for the creation of such an entity. In addition, the knowledge gained is only used one time, in that a City is only required to set up the CCA one time. As a result, a lot of time is wasted in learning something once. This model works well where no cooperative like-minded Cities exist, or for a City that has capable Council and staff willing and able to implement such a venture. In the privatization model, the risk is minimized, a portion of the revenue is retained by the City, staff time is minimal, and the Council’s control is limited. This model works for a City that is not near an existing CCA, or is unwilling to submit to the JPA model, and has limited staff resources. There is a time and place for each model. Determining which model fits your City is essential to long term success. Hybrid JPA Model In researching each of the JPA and CCA formation alternatives, it became apparent that first, one size does not fit all, and second, alternative JPA models can be created to mitigate the risk, share in experience, and allow member agencies to maintain control, and program revenues. As a result, the City of Lancaster is proposing an alternative model to the formation and operation of a CCA. In the proposed Hybrid model (see attached), a JPA has been created (California Clean Energy Authority [CCEA]) between the City of Lancaster and the City of San Jacinto, with the Lancaster City Council serving as the Board of Directors. These two Cities will be considered the “Original 4 Members” and will receive no additional benefit other than that which is contracted for by any associate member agencies. The Board of Directors will serve as the legislative and operational oversight of the corresponding contractual relationships with associate member agencies. This structure will allow each member agency to benefit from the knowledge and experience Lancaster has gained without ceding control to the JPA. Under this scenario, a City would become an associate member of the JPA and that membership would be governed by a corresponding agreement which lays out each member’s responsibilities, costs, and obligations. Each associate member contract will have unique qualities that allow each City to tailor their relationship to be most beneficial and most appropriate for that City. The CCEA will then contract with the City of Lancaster to perform an agreed upon scope of work for the Associate Member Agency. Being that each contract is unique, each City may choose which services are important, which can be done in house, and which should be performed under the CCEA. This model allows each member agency the following benefits: Deferral of risk to the JPA Utilization of existing contracts and costs Benefit of existing trained and experienced staff Transparency to procurement costs Transparency to operational costs Maintain necessary operation controls Maintain rate setting capabilities Development of local programs tailored to each community Cost savings and efficiency Control of operational revenues for local program development 5 Proposal for Formation of Work This proposal is being presented in two phases. The first phase is the formation of the CCA, the second phase will relate to the operational phase of the CCA. It is important to note that the operational phase proposal will be coming at a later date when specific information for Phase One is available. As part of the formation, there are multiple tasks which need to be completed: Preparation of the formation ordinance, development of the organizational structure, load data requests, load forecasting, rate analysis, Pro-forma development, and creation of the Implementation Plan. Each of these tasks are essential to understanding the viability of the CCA and are essential for CPUC approval. It is also important to note that these processes at no time put the Associate Member City, or the JPA, under any obligation. Preparation and Formation of the Ordinance………………………………………….$2,050.00 In order to form a CCA, the City Council of each member of the JPA must pass an ordinance certifying its intent to form a CCA. This is a relatively straightforward process and does not commit the Associate Member City Council to any risk. As with all Ordinances, it requires a public hearing and two readings. The ordinance is non-specific to the price, terms and operations of the CCA. Development of Organizational Structure……………………………………………..$5,125.00 As part of the final implementation plan, the team must prepare and show an organizational structure and operational details. This process will identify how the Associate Member City will interface, separate duties, and develop organizational structures which outline the operational functions and duties. Load Data Requests……………………………………………………………………..$3,000.00 Part of the Implementation Plan is a load forecast and estimate of electrical usage. This request is made to SCE and is provided in aggregate form. This allows for an initial analysis of the amount and type of energy being procured and is the first look at the magnitude of local usage. Once certified as a CCA, the CCA is then allowed to view the detailed usage data which will allow for the creation of a more detailed financial picture and rate structure. Load Forecasting, Data Analysis, and Pro-forma Development…………….………..$30,000.00 Once in receipt of the load data, a third party consultant, Pacific Energy Advisors (PEA), will provide the technical expertise to analyze the data, determine a load profile, estimate total usage, compare that to current market conditions, and prepare a pro-forma. Note that this is the initial pro-forma to submit in the Implementation Plan and only provides an estimate. The CCA cannot get the detailed load data certified by the CPUC. Implementation Plan Document Preparation…………………………………………….$4,625.00 The final document preparation takes all the previously created and received information and places such into the final document. The final Implementation Plan is then approved by the Associate Member Council and submitted to the CPUC. Again, note that when approved, the Associate Member City still has no obligation to procure, sell or deliver energy. 6 Administrative and Clerical Expense………………….…………………………………$17,000.00 This item will provide for the administrative and clerical support necessary to ensure a successful outcome at City Council meetings, public forums (if any), and at the CPUC Travel Expense…………………………………………………………………………….$15,200.00 This item will provide for necessary travel related expenses for Phase One. This is a not-to- exceed estimate. Costs will only be billed for actual travel related expenses. Any travel beyond the not-to-exceed estimate will only be with the pre-approval of the Associate Member City. Total Costs for Formation Work……………………………………………………….$77,000.00 7 Structure and Function 8 Project Team R. Rex Parris - Mayor R. Rex Parris is a Lancaster native who has served as Mayor for three terms, starting in 2008. The essential focus and stance of his leadership revolves around the overall well-being of Lancaster residents by aiming to promote public safety, reduce crime, create a sense of community and civic pride, as well as foster community health and wellness; all of which have resonated well among citizens and constituents, in addition to gaining Parris nationwide recognition. Parris has also been at the forefront of repositioning Lancaster as a global leader in the field of alternative and net-zero energy. His vision of making Lancaster the Alternative Energy Capital of the World, and his various successes in this endeavor, has garnered worldwide media attention. Under his auspices, Parris has led the City into unique partnerships with innovative companies, including: eSolar, which built its 5MW solar project and solar thermal power tower plant in Lancaster; China-based Build Your Dreams (BYD) and KB Home, a collaboration resulting in the first affordable solar energy powered housing community; US Topco Energy, Inc., which entered into a memorandum of understanding and a power purchase agreement with the City; and, clean-energy investment firm Beautiful Earth Group, all of which contribute to the ultimate goal of making Lancaster one of the first “Net-Zero Cities” in the world. Outside of his municipal duties, Parris is the co-founder of the R. Rex Parris Law Firm, which he established in 1985 with his wife Carrol. Parris is a graduate of Antelope Valley Community College, as well as the prestigious Scholar’s program at the University of California, Santa Barbara. He earned his Juris Doctor Degree from Southwestern University School of Law and was admitted to the California State Bar in 1980. Parris and his wife continuously support local charities, law enforcement and educational scholarships. Mark Bozigian - City Manager Mark Bozigian has been with the City of Lancaster for over 20 years, the last seven as City Manager. Prior to that, he served as Assistant City Manager, Redevelopment Director, Assistant to the City Manager, and Transportation Programs Coordinator. In total, Mr. Bozigian has been in the public sector for approximately 25 years. Mr. Bozigian’s primary areas of emphasis have been public safety, economic development, redevelopment, transportation, neighborhood revitalization, budgeting, government relations, and grant funding. Prior to his employment with the City, Mr. Bozigian was employed by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) for three years in the Capital Planning and Programming Department. In that time, he directed many MTA programs including the MTA Call for Projects competitive grants program. During his last year at the MTA, he was the Director of the agency’s Long Range Financial Planning section. Prior to his work in the public sector, Mr. Bozigian worked for twelve years in the private sector. He began his professional career at Hughes Aircraft Company. During his ten years at Hughes Aircraft, he held various management positions including that of Business Manager for two laser production programs. Mr. Bozigian also has experience as a realtor and as a partner in a small business and holds both a Bachelors and Masters Degree in Business Administration from Loyola Marymount University. He and his wife live in the Antelope Valley and have two adult children. 9 Jason Caudle – Deputy City Manager Jason Caudle became Lancaster’s Deputy City Manager in 2008. He has been integral in developing and implementing multi-scaled sustainable energy projects, as well as Lancaster’s award-winning downtown district, “The BLVD.” Caudle has overseen formation of the Lancaster Power Authority, California Clean Energy Authority, and Lancaster Choice Energy – the City’s Community Choice Aggregate. Caudle has continuously worked with City planners and solar energy developers to promote a number of ongoing public-private partnerships. Previously, Caudle was Vice President of Public Finance for Kinsell, Newcomb & De Dios, as well as City Manager of Tehachapi, where he established a Redevelopment Agency and formed a police department, among other civic improvements. Caudle holds a bachelor’s degree in Political Science and Master’s degree in Public Policy and Administration, both from California State University Bakersfield (CSUB). A family man, Jason enjoys spending time with his wife Leslie and their two children, Jackson and Kennedy. Barbara Boswell – Director of Lancaster Choice Energy; Director of Finance Barbara Boswell serves as the Director of Lancaster Choice Energy. She handles the development of energy procurement strategy and long-term procurement, budget development and financial planning, as well as the development of marketing and community outreach. Barbara also directs regulatory advocacy. Barbara has over 25 years of experience as Finance Director, her most recent stint being with the City of Lancaster since 2005. Barbara oversees all aspects of finance including long-term financial forecasting and planning, cash management, debt management and administration, budget, purchasing and contracts administration, accounts payable, payroll and financial reporting. Under her helm and leadership, the City has been recognized and bestowed awards by the GFOA (Government Finance Officers Association) for Excellence in Financial Reporting. Barbara holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Woodbury University and a Master’s degree in Public Administration from California State University Dominguez Hills. Barbara is happily married with one daughter. She enjoys spending time with family at the beach, hiking and other outdoor activities. Patti Garibay – Energy Manager Patti Garibay recently joined the Lancaster Choice Energy team to take on the role of Energy Manager. In this capacity, Patti handles marketing and branding for LCE, energy program development, customer relationship development and management, community outreach, customer care, community sponsorship and website content and management. Prior to her LCE position, Patti was a Management Analyst in the City Manager’s Office and Public Works Department and Recreation Supervisor for the Parks Department. Patti was a founding member of the Antelope Valley Jaycees and served in the capacity of President, Community Development Vice President and Secretary. She was a recipient of the Junior Chamber International Santa Clarity Valley and Santa Clarita Valley Business Journal “40 Under 40 Award.” Patti also chairs the City’s Safer Stronger Neighborhoods Committee. Patti holds a bachelor’s degree in Communication from San Diego State University and Master’s degree in Public Administration from California State University Northridge (CSUN). Patti lives in Lancaster with husband Luis and daughter Alexandra and is expecting another child soon. She enjoys travelling, fitness, movies and music. 10 Cathy DeFalco – Energy Manager Cathy DeFalco is the Energy Manager - Regulatory for Lancaster Choice Energy. In this role, Cathy is responsible for managing power procurement, and has oversight of load forecasting and compliance with regulatory filings with the CPUC, California Independent System Operator (CAISO), and California Energy Commission (CEC). In addition, Cathy represents Lancaster Choice Energy at various proceedings advocating on behalf of LCE, ratepayer, and community choice programs on a range of legislative issues. Cathy brings over 25 years of procurement, materials management, and contract management experience in both the public and private sectors to Lancaster Choice Energy. She received an undergraduate degree from the University of LaVerne, a Master Certificate in Contract Management from Villanova University, and in 2013, completed a doctoral degree in law from the Concord School of Law. Cathy was awarded the lifetime designation of Certified Purchasing Manager from the Institute of Supply Management in 2007. She moved to the public sector in 2000 and has been with the City of Lancaster since 2006; first as Purchasing Agent, promoted to Operations Manager overseeing the Procurement and Contracts Division in 2013, and most recently as Energy Manager – Regulatory for Lancaster Choice Energy. In her role as Energy Manager – Regulatory, Cathy negotiated a 2.3 million dollar savings on LCE’s first power agreement. Cathy is an avid reader and loves spending time with her grandchildren. She and her husband Pat are involved in animal rescue and share their home with five rescued dogs and a rescued potbellied pig. They also enjoy hiking, traveling, and attending live music concerts. Monique Edwards – IT/Customer Care Manager Monique Edwards is the IT/Customer Care Manager for Lancaster Choice Energy. In this role, Monique is responsible for oversight of the Customer Care/Data Management contract, including but not limited to customer enrollment/customer service and the call center interface. Additionally, Monique manages the customer data interface, monitors data exceptions and resolves issues within policy established timelines. Monique serves as the primary interface with SCE on data discrepancies and resolves issues accordingly. Monique brings over 20 years of management and customer service experience in both the public and private sectors to Lancaster Choice Energy. She received her Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration from the University of Phoenix, a Master in Business Administration Degree from California State University, Dominquez Hills, a Master Certificate in Human Resource Management from Villanova University, and is near completion of a Doctoral Degree in Business Administration from Walden University. Monique was nominated as a Los Angeles Business Journal CIO of The Year finalist in 2013. She moved to the public sector in 2005 when she began her employment with the City of Lancaster; first as a Management Analyst I, promoted to Management Analyst II, Operations Manager, Senior Operations Manager, and most recently as IT/Customer Care Manager for Lancaster Choice Energy. In addition to her duties with Lancaster Choice Energy, Monique manages the IT Department for the City of Lancaster, including various projects, personnel, and budget. Monique enjoys music and dancing, but most of all, loves spending time with her children and other family members. 11 Thank you for the opportunity to assist the City of Hermosa Beach. Please feel free to contact the Lancaster Choice Energy team should you have further questions. Mark Bozigian, City Manager (661) 723-6133 Jason Caudle, Deputy City Manager (661) 723-6010 Barbara Boswell, Director of Finance (661) 723-6035 County of Los Angeles INTERNAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT 1100 North Eastern Avenue Los Angeles, California 90063 JIM JONES Director “To enrich lives through effective and caring service” Telephone: (323) 267-2006 FAX: (323) 260-5237 September 21, 2015 Tom Bakaly, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION PROGRAM Dear Tom, Given your City’s expedited efforts to implement a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) program in support of your 2020 carbon neutrality goals, I wanted to personally provide to you an update on the status of the County’s efforts towards implementing CCA. Our Board of Supervisors approved the County Office of Sustainability to move forward with CCA implementation by doing the following: Conduct a technical study using County unincorporated and other cities’ consumption data as part of developing a CCA Business Plan that will identify CCA start-up and operating costs, revenue projections, and electric rate projections. Convene a County-wide CCA Task Force (within weeks) to discuss the County’s CCA efforts with interested city and other stakeholders; provide progress and updates on CCA implementation. Discuss and analyze strategies for CCA scale in the region; e.g., what are the pros and cons of large, regional programs versus smaller, local programs. Discuss and recommend CCA governance models. The County’s consultant team is on board and will commence work when sufficient “phase 1” consumption data is made available. The sufficiency of “phase 1” data is something the consultants and the Task Force will discuss. We are ready to accept data from interested cities now and a general communication to cities will go out shortly. It is currently my objective that a County-wide CCA may be implemented in less than a year with the Business Plan (for phase 1) completed about 3 months after sufficient data is received. Your participation in the County-wide CCA implementation will not be impacted through any investigatory work you pursue with the Lancaster CCA. Look forward to working with you as we move forward in this truly remarkable endeavor. Howard Choy General Manager, Office of Sustainability County of Los Angeles CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KRISTY MORRIS, ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST SUBJECT: 9-24-15 STUDY SESSION – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION CURRENT STATUS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CCA PROGRAM AND CLARIFYING CITY’S PARTICIPATION IN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CCA DATE: SEPTEMBER 22, 2015 CC: TOM BAKALY, ANN YANG On Monday September 21, 2015 staff spoke with Howard Choy, General Manager of the Los Angeles County Office of Sustainability, to discuss the current status of the Los Angeles County CCA Program and discuss the City’s options for pursuing CCA simultaneously with Los Angeles County and the City of Lancaster. Unfortunately Howard is unable to attend the study session on September 24, 2015 and he has provided a letter summarizing his discussion with us. Staff asked Howard to clarify if the City can participate in the two programs simultaneously in both Phase 1-Feasibility Study, and Phase 2-Implementation. It was not clear from the statement in his letter that the City’s participation “will not be impacted through any investigatory work you pursue with the Lancaster CCA”. In a follow-up email (attached) from Mr. Choy he confirms that if we submit our data, we are included in the County Feasibility Study and Program, and we can pursue the Lancaster CCA however we choose. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KRISTY MORRIS, ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST SUBJECT: 9-24-15 STUDY SESSION – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION CURRENT STATUS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CCA PROGRAM AND CLARIFYING CITY’S PARTICIPATION IN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CCA DATE: SEPTEMBER 22, 2015 CC: TOM BAKALY, ANN YANG On Monday September 21, 2015 staff spoke with Howard Choy, General Manager of the Los Angeles County Office of Sustainability, to discuss the current status of the Los Angeles County CCA Program and discuss the City’s options for pursuing CCA simultaneously with Los Angeles County and the City of Lancaster. Unfortunately Howard is unable to attend the study session on September 24, 2015 and he has provided a letter summarizing his discussion with us. Staff asked Howard to clarify if the City can participate in the two programs simultaneously in both Phase 1-Feasibility Study, and Phase 2-Implementation. It was not clear from the statement in his letter that the City’s participation “will not be impacted through any investigatory work you pursue with the Lancaster CCA”. In a follow-up email (attached) from Mr. Choy he confirms that if we submit our data, we are included in the County Feasibility Study and Program, and we can pursue the Lancaster CCA however we choose. From: Howard Choy [mailto:HChoy@isd.lacounty.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:24 AM To: Kristy Morris Cc: Ann Yang; Tom Bakaly Subject: Re: RE: Sorry I'm trying to be clear. If you send us your data, you are in the county study and program if you'd like. You can do what you like w Lancaster. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Kristy Morris <kmorris@hermosabch.org> wrote: Hi Howard, Can we be involved in the two programs simultaneously in both the feasibility study and implementation- this is the point that really needs clarity. Your statement “will not be impacted through any investigatory work you pursue with the Lancaster CCA” is a still a little elusive. Does this mean that we are fine to pursue the feasibility study but can potentially get excluded from the County Program if we move forward with Implementation with Lancaster (Phase 2)? Thanks Kristy STUDY SESSION COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION (CCA) Kristy Morris, Environmental Analyst September 24, 2015 September 24, 2015 STUDY SESSION: COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION2 1.Introduction to CCA 2.Discussion of options for Hermosa Beach •Los Angeles County CCA •City of Lancaster CCA 3.Question and Answers AGENDA INTRODUCTION TO CCA 3 Community Choice Aggregation allows communities to offer procurement service to electric customers within their boundaries September 24, 2015 STUDY SESSION: COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION INTRODUCTION TO CCA 4 September 24, 2015 STUDY SESSION: COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION Example Billing Statement CCA PROCESS FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES Pass Ordinance Certifying Intent to form a CCA Determine Organizational Structure and Operation Request Electrical Load Data From SCE Analyze Load Data and Profile, est. Usage, Compare to Market Conditions, Prepare a Pro- forma Prepare Final Implementation Plan Submission and Approval of Implementation Plan by CPUC July 22, 2012 Footer text here5 Feasibility Study BACKGROUND ON CCA FOR HERMOSA BEACH 6 2010 HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL SETS A GOAL TO PURSUE CARBON NUETRALITY 2013 CARBON NEUTRAL SCOPING PLAN IDENTIFIES CCA AS MOST POWERFUL TOOL FOR ADVANCING CARBON NEUTRALITY September 9, 2014 CITY COUNCIL ADOPTS RESOLUTION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STUDY OF FEASIBILITY OF CCA FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH November 18, 2014 •CITY HOSTS CCA STUDY SESSION February 24, 2015 •CITY SETS A GOAL TO BE CARBON NEAUTRAL FOR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS BY 2020 September 24, 2015 STUDY SESSION: COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION 2012Metric TonnesCO2-eBuildings & Facilities Outdoor Lighting Employee Commute Vehicle Fleet Solid Waste Water Pumping Electricity Transportation Waste Source: 2005 & 2007 Inventories and 2014 Inventory & Forecasting Report from the Draft Energy Efficiency & Climate Action Plan MUNICIPAL GHG INVENTORY September 24, 2015 CCA OPTIONS LOS ANGELES COUNTY CCA LANCASTER CLEAN ENERGY CCA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CCA BACKGROUND •March 17, 2015: Los Angeles Co. Board of Supervisors instructed staff to produce a report on the CCA potential for the County •June 24, 2015: CCA report highlights many potential environmental and financial benefits of CCA to the County •September 15th, 2015: Los Angeles Co. Board of Supervisors unanimously voted to move forward with a Feasibility Study and utilize up to $300,000 for a consultant costs 9 September 24, 2015 STUDY SESSION: COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION LOS ANGELES COUNTY CCA UPDATE FROM LA COUNTY •Board of Supervisors approved the Office of Sustainability to move forward with CCA implementation plan •The County’s consultant team is on board and will commence work when sufficient “phase 1” consumption data is made available. •County are ready to accept data from interested cities •It objective that a County-wide CCA may be implemented in less than a year with the Business Plan (for phase 1) completed about 3 months after sufficient data is received. 10 September 24, 2015 STUDY SESSION: COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION LANCASTER CCA BACKGROUND •April 22, 2015: City of Hermosa beach staff, elected officials and community stakeholders visited Lancaster to learn about their clean energy initiatives and Lancaster Choice Energy •July 31, 2015: On request, City of Lancaster provided a proposal to join Lancaster Choice Energy CCA 11 September 24, 2015 STUDY SESSION: COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION CCA ANALYSIS •City is pursuing both options simultaneously •Los Angeles County and City of Lancaster have confirmed that there is no conflict of interest in this approach •Staff are assessing the potential limitations and opportunities of each CCA program 12 September 24, 2015 STUDY SESSION: COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION RECOMMENDATIONS •Pursue feasibility studies for both the Los Angeles County and City of Lancaster CCA programs •Council considers contract with City of Lancaster for $77,000 to complete the feasibility study in October 2015 •The City implements CCA program upon approval of an implementation plan by the CPUC and City Council by 2017 13 September 24, 2015 STUDY SESSION: COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0677 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 LETTER FROM JAMES HAUSLE DATED SEPTEMBER 3, 2015 REGARDING MARCH 3RD INCIDENT Recommended Action: To receive and file the written communication from James Hausle. Attachments: Letter from James Hausle Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ From: James Hausle [mailto:jhausle@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 12:44 PM To: City Council; City Clerk Subject: March 3 incident Please make this part of the public record for the next city council meeting. The actions taken by the Hermosa Beach police chief in response to the March 3 incident at the Standing Room amounts to an abuse of power. The police chief could have diffused this situation with a few discussions with the police officer and the citizens involved but instead she chose to flex her muscles and threaten anyone who got in her way including the Chamber of Commerce and Chris Miller. This is not the kind of place we want Hermosa Beach to be. We cannot move on until we admit mistakes were made, apologies are made with policy changes set in place to prevent this from happening again. The city council can make this happen by changing policy and directing the city manager to implement changes to prevent this in the future. It does not matter how green or carbon neutral we are if we are afraid be around our local police. Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0678 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 LETTER FROM JACKIE TAGLIAFERRO DATED SEPTEMBER 3, 2015 REGARDING MARCH 3RD INCIDENT Recommended Action: To receive and file the written communication from Jackie Tagliaferro. Attachments: Letter from Jackie Tagliaferro Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ From: jhausle@juno.com [mailto:jhausle@juno.com] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 6:22 PM To: City Council; City Clerk Subject: March 3rd Fiasco Please add this to the agenda as part of the official record To all City Council Members, It doesn’t matter if you were at The Standing Room on March 3rd or not. The unfairness given to our community members is an embarrassment. Someone was going to win that night. It was No On O. Their celebration was short lived and we have been forced to live in the shadow of secrecy of what happened for 5 months while the city paid an outside agency to ‘investigate” what really happened. Five months and $30 thousand dollars later and we as a community are still in the shadow of secrecy. Evidence gathered has no validity. Anyone can listen to the tapes. There is no riot inducing chant of “F**K the Police” or any use of the “F” word. Actions taken by the police chief were inappropriate regardless of what was said that night. Why did this matter even get such notoriety? Why was the police chief allowed to write a threatening letter to the President of the Chamber. Why did it take the officer 8 days to file a report on the incident? This situation has split the community. This situation should have been handled easily by the chief of police. Things have to change. Compensate those whose livelihood and well being were significantly impacted and harmed due to the unnecessary action by the chief of police. Publicly acknowledge that mistakes were made. Put changes in place to prevent this from happening again. Jackie Tagliaferro Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0686 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 LETTER FROM MARIANO ALVAREZ DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 AND FOLLOW UP LETTER AND ATTACHMENTS DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 REGARDING OCEAN TIRE VIOLATIONS Recommended Action: To receive and file the written communication from Mariano Alvarez. Attachments: Letters and Attachments from Mariano Alvarez Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ From: Mariano Alvarez [mailto:themariano@webtv.net] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 11:36 AM To: Elaine Doerfling Subject: I shared “TUCKER THROW THE LAWS AWAY- JEFF.VOB” with you in OneDrive PLEASE SHOW THIS VIDEO TO MAYOR PETTY, SINCE SHE WAS SWORN TO OBEY THE LAW, PLEASE WATCH PETER TUCKER STATEMENTS OF NOT ENFORCING THE LAW, THANK YOU. (JENKINS ONLY COUNCIL CAN AMEND THE LAW). I NEED A CONFIRMATION, THANK YOU. MARIO TUCKER THROW THE LAWS AWAY- JEFF View in OneDrive Free online storage for your files. Check it out. Get the OneDrive mobile app. Microsoft respects your privacy. To learn more, please read our Privacy Statement. Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, 98052 From: themariano@webtv.net To: phoffman@lmu.edu; james.reina@sen.ca.gov; hsfangary@gmail.com; edoerfling@hermosabch.org; fernando.morales@sen.ca.gov; mikeflaherty2010@gmail.com; mjenkins@localgovlaw.com; ally.sidley@sen.ca.gov; alex.kang@sen.ca.gov; peter@electpetertucker.com Subject: RE: Rosinsky4.doc Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 05:58:27 -0700 Hi James- HERE IS THE LETTER THAT THE CITY SENT TO OCEAN TIRE, ABOUT REMOVING THE POLE SIGN NO LATER THAN JUNE 30/2009, THIS WAS THE DEADLINE TO AMEND THE POLE SIGN, AND YOU HAVE THE DVD SHOWING THAT IT WAS AMENDED ON SEP. 15/2009, I SENT E- MAILS TO EVERY COUNCIL AND COMMISSION MEMBERS ABOUT THIS AND THEY IGNORED ME, SO THEY ALLOWED THIS ILLEGAL AMENDMENT, NOT ONLY BECAUSE THEY MISSED THE DEADLINE BUT BECAUSE THE POLE SIGN IS NOT UP-TO CODE, IT HAS 2 POLES THEY ONLY ALLOWED 1 POLE, PLUS IT HAS ADVERTISEMENT WHICH IT IS PROHIBITED IN HERMOSA BEACH, AND LIKE YOU ALREADY KNOW BECAUSE YOU AND I AGREED THAT THE CITY STAFF ARE NOT OBEYING THE LAW, FOR OCEAN TIRE THERE ARE NO LAWS, THIS IS WHY THEY ARE ALLOW TO EXPAND WITHOUT LIMITATIONS, EVERY ONE IS TELLING ME THAT THIS NEEDS AN INTERPRETATION, THERE IS NOTHING THAT ANY ONE CAN TELL ME THAT IS LEGAL ABOUT OCEAN TIRE, I'M SENDING YOU THE LETTER FROM THE U.S.SENATE THAT IT SHOWS THE DEADLINE, AND IT ALSO STATES THAT IF OCEAN TIRE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITHIN THREE YEARS THE UNFINISHED BUILDING MUST BE DEMOLISH, WE ALREADY KNOW THAT OCEAN TIRE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SETBACKS, WITH THIS ALONE NOTHING IS FINISHED ABOUT OCEAN TIRE, AND ABOUT THE CITY MANAGER TOM BAKALY AND CITY ATTORNEY MICHAEL JENKINS WHICH THESE TWO ARE PARTNERS THEY MUST ENFORCE EVERY KIND OF LAW OR THEY MUST BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR WRONG DOING, THE CITY MANAGER STATING AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING THAT THERE IS NOTHING ILLEGAL ABOUT OCEAN TIRE, THIS MAN MUST BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THIS, ALONE WITH EVERY ONE ELSE THAT KNEW THAT HE WAS LYING, AGAIN HERE IS EVIDENCE THAT THERE IS A REQUIREMENT TO KEEP THE BACKDOOR CLOSED, AND THE CITY ALLOWED OCEAN TIRE TO KEEP IT OPEN, CLAIMING THAT THERE IS NO LEGAL REQUIREMENT TO KEEP IT CLOSED, SO THE CITY WERE USING THE BACKDOOR AS AN EXTORTION TO BOTHER ME AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE SO I CAN MOVE OUT OF MY HOUSE, SO THEY CAN CONTINUE THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES, THEY WERE ABUSING ME IN EVERY POSSIBLE WAY, YOU MUST KNOW THAT ELDER ABUSE IS A CRIME IN L.A. COUNTY, PLUS I'M A VETERAN OF THE U.S. ARMY, AND THIS IS HOW THESE PEOPLE TREAT THE VETERANS, AND ALSO YOU REQUESTED 1208 OCEAN DRIVE ZONE CHANGED AND THEY DON'T HAVE IT, AND THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE THE REVOCATION OF THE C.U.P. FROM 1017 AVIATION BLVD "KING BEAR" , HOW CAN THEY REVOKE THIS C.U.P. IF THEY STATED THAT THERE WAS NOT SUCH RESOLUTION, THESE PEOPLE ARE REPUGNANT, THE REASON THAT THEY TRIED TO HIDE THIS RESOLUTION, WAS SO THEY CAN GIVE THE OWNER OF OCEAN TIRE WHATEVER HE WANTED, BECAUSE THEY KNEW THAT THE C.U.P. RUNS WITH THE PROPERTY, I TALKED TO THE F.B.I. AND I WAS TOLD THAT THE CITY MUST DOCUMENT EVERYTHING OF WHAT THEY DO, SO I REQUESTED THE APPLICATION OF OCEAN TIRE WHEN THEY FIRST OPEN IN 1999, AND THEY TOLD ME THAT THEY DID NOT NEED AN APPLICATION, THAT THEY WERE WORKING UNDER THE 1992 RESOLUTION (C.U.P.) THERE IS ONE PROBLEM WITH THIS, THIS C.U.P. WAS ONLY AN AUTO REPAIR SHOP, AND IN 2006 THEY AMENDED RESOLUTION SO THEY CAN SELL TIRES (THEY STARTED SELLING TIRES IN 1999) , AND THE SAME THING WITH THE SECOND STORY, THEY TRIED TO FIX IT, AFTER THEY LEARNED THAT I KNEW THAT SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR A TWO STORY BUILDING IS 10 FEET, CLAIMING THAT IT IS A MEZZANINE, AND THIS IS ANOTHER PROBLEM, YOU CAN NOT BUILD A MEZZANINE ON TOP OF BUILDINGS, ESPECIALLY ON TOP OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WITH CODE ENFORCER BOB ROLLINGS STATING IN ONE OF THE ATTACHMENTS, THAT THE THREE FEET SPACE BETWEEN THE EXISTING BUILDING AND MY PROPERTY IS ACCEPTABLE, SO HOW CAN THIS BE LEGAL, AND ALSO KEN ROBERTSON IGNORING THE 50% CODE THAT HE MENTIONED IN THE MINUTES OF THE RESOLUTION FROM 2006, (HE CALLED IT !00%) TRYING TO DECEIVE ME, WHICH LATER HE IGNORED, AND WENT TO A NEW CODE THAT IS ONLY APPLICABLE TO C-1 & C-2 ZONES (THIS NEW CODE FROM 1994 HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH A C-3 ZONE WHICH OCEAN TIRE IS) YOU CAN SEE THIS IN ORDINANCE 94-1115 PLUS THE ORIGINAL, AND FOR THE CITY MANAGER & PARTNER CITY ATTORNEY THERE IS NO OPTION ABOUT ENFORCING THE LAWS, THESE TWO MUST OBEY THE LAW, AND THEY MUST BE ACCOUNTABLE IF THEY DO NOT, AND THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT THEY ARE NOT OBEYING THE LAWS, I PLAYED FOR YOU A DVD WHERE PETER TUCKER STATED THAT THEY ARE NOT ENFORCING THE LAWS AND MIGHT AS WELL THROW THE BOOK OF LAWS AWAY, AND THIS MAN ALSO TELLING ME THAT THEY GAVE ME A GENEROUS SETBACK THAT THEY COULD ENCROACH EVEN CLOSER, EVERY TIME THAT PETER TUCKER MENTIONED OCEAN TIRE ZONE, HE SAID IS A C- PROPERTY TRYING TO DECEIVE ME, HE NEVER SAID IS A C-3 PROPERTY, HE WAS TRYING TO MAKE ME BELIEVE THAT IT WAS A C-1 - C-2 ZONE, (I HAVE THIS ON VIDEO) , THIS MAN IS A FRAUD, PLEASE REPORT ALL THESE TO SENATOR ALLEN SINCE HE STATED THAT HE IS HOLDING GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR WRONG DOING, I WENT TO SEE COMMISSIONER MIKE FLAHERTY AND I SHOW HIM THE LETTER FROM BOB ROLLINS, KEN ROBERTSON AND STEVE BURRELL WHERE OCEAN TIRE IS ALLOWED TO EXPAND WITHOUT LIMITATION AND THE NEW CODE, AND HE TOLD ME THAT HE WAS GOING TO TALK TO KEN ROBERTSON ABOUT IT, SO I OFFERED TO GIVE HIM THE "LETTER" SO HE CAN SHOW IT TO HIM, AND VERY QUICKLY RAISING HIS ARMS HE SAID TO ME "I DON'T WANT IT", AND AFTER THAT I NEVER HEARD FROM HIM, AND HE TOLD ME THAT HE IS HIS OWN BOSS, AND I BELIEVE HE IS A MILITARY MAN "MISSING IN ACTION", THE SAME WITH KIT BOBKO MR. AIR FORCE ANOTHER ONE MISSING IN ACTION, IN ALL THE TIMES THAT I WENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS HE NEVER SAID ONE WORD TO SUPPORT ME. AND I HAVE ALL THE VIDEOS TO PROVE IT, THIS MAN SHOULD BE COURT-MARSHAL FOR MISSING IN ACTION, AND THEN HE STATED THAT EVERY BODY ACTED IN GOOD FAITH TOWARDS ME, AND PLEASE REMEMBER I WILL NOT BE ACCUSING ANY BODY IF I DID NOT HAVE THE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT MY ACCUSATIONS, SO PLEASE REPORT ALL THESE TO SENATOR ALLEN, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MARIO From: themariano@webtv.net To: phoffman@Lmu.edu Subject: Fw: Rosinsky4.doc Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:43:12 +0000 Mr. Hoffman, this is the letter that Rollins sent to Ocean Tires, and he can't even enforce his own letter, and he is willing to help him with the sign, and he is not helping me to keep the Emergency door Close, because is making me very stress, this house cost me to much money, because I had an Ocean View, and now instead I have a View of Inside a Tire Shop and my house is in a Resort Town, this is not right. Mario Alvarez From: CozmicNite@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2009 2:36 AM To: themariano@webtv.net Subject: Rosinsky4.doc Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254- 3884 City of Hermosa Beach June 1, 2009 #08-03 Mr. Ron Rosinsky Ocean Tire 1017 Aviation Boulevard Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Subject: Violations (P.C. Resolution 06-20) at 1017 Aviation Boulevard, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. Dear Mr. Rosinsky; While we appreciate the unforeseen set backs to your project, you continue to violate the terms and conditions of your agreements with the City. At this point in time we have two outstanding issues which need to be resolved as stipulated by conditions of approval # 4, 6, and 12 of the above noted Resolution. 1. The use of the north side yard is not to be used for storage of any kind, and it must be landscaped as per approved plans and the requirements of the Conditional Use Permit. 2. Pursuant to the conditions for approval of the Conditional Use Permit, the existing pole sign must be removed. To correct these violations, and avoid legal action against you, you are required to remove all stored materials from the north side yard and call for an inspection by June 15, 2009. Install all landscaping as specified on approved plans by June 30, 2009. Finally, the pole sign must be removed by June 30, 2009. Alternatively, you could submit an application to request the Planning Commission to eliminate or amend the conditions of your CUP (copy enclosed) regarding the sign, by June 15, the deadline for being heard at the July Planning Commission meeting. If I can be of any assistance, I can be reached at (310) 318-0235 from 7:00a.m. until 6:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday. Respectfully, Bob Rollins Bob Rollins cc Ken Robertson, Director, Community Development Department; Eva Choi, Assistant Planner; City Prosecutor We found the real 'Hotel California' and the 'Seinfeld' diner. What will you find? Explore WhereItsAt.com. Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0699 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the following minutes: 1.Regular Meeting of July 8, 2014 2.Regular Meeting of July 22, 2014 3.Adjourned Regular Meeting of July 29, 2014 4.Adjourned Regular Meeting of August 26, 2014 Attachments: 1.Regular Meeting of July 8, 2014 2.Regular Meeting of July 22, 2014 3.Adjourned Regular Meeting of July 29, 2014 4.Adjourned Regular Meeting of August 26, 2014 Submitted by: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk Noted: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City Council Minutes 07-08-14 Page 14024 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, July 8, 2014, at the hour of 6:07 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Mayor DiVirgilio ROLL CALL: Present:Barragan, Fangary, Petty, Tucker, Mayor DiVirgilio Absent:None PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF THE HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT (HIA): Consultant Verbal Summary; Council Questions; Questions from the Public. City Manager Bakaly provided background information, stating that a summary would be given at tonight’s meeting and the actual report will be released next week. Dr. Mary McDaniel, Intrinsik (formerly of McDaniel and Lambert), said external peer review had been performed by Elizabeth Hodges Snyder. Dr. Chris Ollson described the changes that had been made and both Dr. McDaniel and Dr. Ollson responded to Council questions. PUBLIC COMMENT: Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Robert Fortunato George Schmeltzer Jim Sullivan Chuck Sheldon Jani Lange Responding to questions, City Manager Bakaly said changes would not be redlined but a summary format would be provided as a part of the staff report. The meeting recessed at 7:15 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 7:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Dan Marinelli ROLL CALL: Present:Barragan, Fangary, Petty, Tucker, Mayor DiVirgilio Absent:None CLOSED SESSION REPORT – None ANNOUNCEMENTS –Councilmember Fangary thanked Police/Fire departments and staff for a safe 4th of July; spoke of the recent shark bite injury that resulted in City Council Minutes 07-08-14 Page 14025 closing the Manhattan Beach Pier to fishing; and said he will request support tonight to agendize a discussion about Hermosa Pier options in light of this development. Councilmember Barragan thanked the public safety staff for a safe 4th of July; spoke of attending the June 2014 National Association of Latino Elected Officials (NALEO) conference in San Diego, with panels ranging from economic development to water preservation. Mayor pro tem Tucker also thanked City staff for a safe July 4th, and acknowledged Los Angeles County Sheriff deputies, Athens Services, and Los Angeles County maintenance crews for their assistance; said the West Coast Water Basin is installing an ocean friendly garden at the Community Center on July 14; asked that tonight’s meeting be adjourned in memory of two Hermosa residents who recently passed away, Paul Matthies and Angela Peterson. Mayor DiVirgilio asked that tonight’s meeting also be adjourned in memory of former City Manager Earl Diller, who passed away in May. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS RECOGNIZING DAN MARINELLI FOR HIS SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY Dan Marinelli expressed his appreciation for the recognition and cited several City officials and staff members for their service. Mayor DiVirgilio thanked Mr. Marinelli for being a terrific friend, as well as a model commissioner and community member. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND JOHN WORKMAN SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS Maureen Hunt, Chamber of Commerce Executive Director, presented scholarship honors to Andrew Dates, a graduating senior at Mira Costa High School who will attend Carnegie Mellon University. The John Workman Scholarship was then presented to Luke Murphy, a graduating senior from Redondo Union High School with plans to attend Stanford University. Mary Ellen Workman said it was a pleasure to be on the selection committee in memory of her late husband, congratulated Mr. Murphy and presented a gift to him. LEADERSHIP HERMOSA BEACH “THANK YOU PRESENTATION” TO CITY STAFF AND COMMUNITY FROM LEADERSHIP HERMOSA CLASS OF 2014 Andrea Giancoli and Ryan Nowicki congratulated the class of 2014, noting the success of their community service project, Pillars of our People (POP) that beautified volleyball courts near the Pier. They thanked supporters at the City and in the community, and encouraged applications for the 2015 class, which can be done at www.leadershiphermosa.org. City Council Minutes 07-08-14 Page 14026 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: 1.ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Moira Nelson Don Gould, Manhattan Beach Library Manager Harold Cohen Segal children Isabella Bacallao SaraJane Baccalao and Sophia Pizer George Schmeltzer George Barks Richard O’Reilly and Dennis Jarvis, Spyder Surfboards Susan Darcy Sal Longo Sidra Wieder Allan Mason Eric Foster Mike Binder No name given Joan Arias Grant Ibrahim James Mitchell Lawrence Chaves Shane Manning Barbara Ellman 2.CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (e) with the exception of the following items, which were removed for discussion in item 4, but are shown in order for clarity: 2(c) Tucker, 2(e) Barragan. Motion Petty, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 8:52 p.m., the order of the agenda moved to item 5a. (a)RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on February 11, 2014; and 2) Minutes of the Special meeting held on February 25, 2014. Action: To approve as presented the minutes of the City Council’s Regular meeting of February 11, 2014 and Special meeting of February 25, 2014. City Council Minutes 07-08-14 Page 14027 (b)RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY CHECK REGISTERS AND TO APPROVE CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. 1)June 19, 2014: Nos. 74083 through 74159, 1461543, 1463143 and 6192014. 2)June 26, 2014: 74160 through 74235, and 14655135. 3)June 27, 2014: 74236, and the cancellation of 73715 and 73837. Action: To ratify the check registers, and approve the cancellation of certain checks, as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c)RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Supplemental email from Howard Longacre dated July 8, 2014. This item was pulled by Mayor pro tem Tucker for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To receive and file tentative future agenda items, scheduling discussion of the Pier/Strand hotel project and free parking for the Adjourned Regular meeting of July 29, 2014. Motion Tucker, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (d)RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE MAY 2014 FINANCIAL REPORTS: 1) Revenue and Expenditure Report; 2) Cash Balances Report; and 3) City Treasurer’s Report. Action: To receive and file the May 2014 Revenue and Expenditure Report; the May 2014 Cash Balances Report; and the May 2014 City Treasurer’s Report. (e)RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH CIVILSOURCE OF IRVINE, CA TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY ENGINEERING STAFFING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FOR A NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $150,000. Memorandum from Public Works Director Frank Senteno dated June 30, 2014. This item was pulled by Councilmember Barragan for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director Senteno responded to Council questions. City Manager Bakaly also responded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 07-08-14 Page 14028 Action: To approve an agreement with CivilSource of Irvine, CA to provide temporary engineering staffing services for various capital improvement projects for a not-to-exceed amount of $150,000. Motion Barragan, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 3.CONSENT ORDINANCES – None 4.ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION The two items removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Item 2(e) was heard first at 1:24 a.m., followed by item 2(c) at 1:40 a.m. Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. At 1:52 a.m., the order of the agenda moved to item 9. 5.PUBLIC HEARINGS (a)E&B OIL DRILLING & PRODUCTION PROJECT – CERTIFICATION OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT: 1) Consideration of Resolution to Certify the Final Environmental Impact Report (including the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) for the development of Oil Drilling and Production Project proposed by E&B Natural Resources Management Corp. at 555 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, including analysis of relocation of City Maintenance Yard; and 2) Consideration of the legislative actions for the E&B Oil Drilling and Production that will be presented to the voters (Coastal Land Use Plan and Municipal Code amendments and development agreement). Memorandum from Community Development Director Ken Robertson dated July 2, 2014. Supplemental emails from Nicki Carlsen of Alston & Bird, LLP, and from Tom Morley, both dated July 7, 2014. Community Development Director Robertson presented the staff report and responded to Council questions, recommending that item #2 be delayed to a future meeting. City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions and presented a redlined version of the resolution, as well as Section 8 of the FEIR, Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Monitoring Plan. Luis Perez, Marine Research Services (MRS) Project Manager, came forward to respond to Council questions. Ed Almanza, City consultant/EIR Project Manager, also came forward to respond to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 9:37 p.m. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: City Council Minutes 07-08-14 Page 14029 Tom Morley Julie Hamill Kevin Sousa George Schmeltzer Amy Roth, E&B Mike Finch, E&B Vice President Craig Cadwallader, Surfrider Foundation, South Bay Chapter Martha Logan George Barks Lauren Pizer Mains Jess Lurie Marci Palla Joe Galliani, South Bay Climate 350 Dency Nelson Jim Sullivan Sarah Sikich, Heal the Bay Jose Bacallao Chris Miller Michael Keegan The public hearing closed at 10:25 p.m. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 14-6908 entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIR), AND CONFIRMING THE LANGUAGE IN THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROPOSED OIL DRILLING AND PRODUCTION PROJECT AT 555 6TH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH AND THE CORRESPONDING CITY YARD RELOCATION AT 1315 VALLEY DRIVE AND 552 11TH PLACE IN HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA (E&B OIL PROJECT),” as revised this evening by the City Attorney; and 2) Continue to the meeting of September 22, 2014, consideration of the legislative actions for the E&B Oil Drilling and Production project that will be presented to the voters (Coastal Land Use Plan and Municipal Code amendments and development agreement). Motion Fangary, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. The meeting recessed at 11:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 11:21 p.m. (b)MEMORANDUM FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR KEN ROBERTSON DATED JULY 3, 2014 REGARDING ADOPTION OF METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MTA) LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT AND SELF CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089. City Council Minutes 07-08-14 Page 14030 This item was continued to the July 22, 2014 meeting. 6.MUNICIPAL MATTERS (a)STATUS REPORT ON E&B’S PROPOSED OIL DRILLING AND PRODUCTION PROJECT AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING ELECTION TIMING AND DIRECTION TO SUBCOMMITTEE REGARDING NEGOTIATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Ken Robertson dated July 3, 2014. Supplemental memorandum from Michael N. Mills of Stoel Rives, LLP dated July 7, 2014. Two supplemental emails from Tom Morley, received July 3 and July 7, 2014. Community Development Director presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Bakaly and City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Tom Morley Steve Layton, E&B President Lauren Pizer Mains Kevin Sousa George Schmeltzer Jose Bacallao Craig Cadwallader, Surfrider Foundation, South Bay Chapter Ray Dussault Phil Friedl Chris Prenter Mike Finch, E&B Vice President Alicia Villareal Chris Miller Walt Kasha Michael Mills, Partner, Stoel Rives LLP, the City’s oil and gas attorney, responded to Council questions. Nicki Carlsen, Partner, Alston & Bird LLP, E&B’s attorney, responded to Council questions. Action: To direct Michael Mills, the City’s oil and gas attorney, of Stoel Rives LLP, to obtain an opinion from the State Lands Commission on whether advances and royalties to Macpherson Oil can be paid from the Tidelands Trust; and to provide any desired opinions to Kosmont. Motion Barragan, second Fangary. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 1:24 a.m., the order of the agenda moved to item 2e. City Council Minutes 07-08-14 Page 14031 7.MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER – None 8.MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL – None 9.OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL (a)Request from Mayor DiVirgilio to have staff return with a discussion to clarify Council’s direction regarding zero tolerance code enforcement. Action: To direct staff to return with a discussion to clarify Council’s direction regarding Zero Tolerance Code Enforcement citywide. Motion DiVirgilio, supported by Fangary and Tucker. (b)Request from Mayor pro tem Tucker to have staff return with a discussion on the standards in the resolution that governs “outdoor dining design and operational standards for Pier Plaza” (CC Res. 05- 6417 as amended by CC Res. 12-6802). Action: To direct staff to return with a discussion on the standards in the Resolution that governs “Outdoor Dining Design and Operational Standards for Pier Plaza” (CC Resolution No. 05-6417 as amended by CC Resolution No. 12-6802). Motion Tucker, supported by Petty and DiVirgilio. (c)Request from Councilmember Fangary for an update on the Manhattan Beach Pier closure to fishing and a staff recommendation so the City Council can make a more informed decision regarding any changes Hermosa Beach should make regarding fishing from its pier. Action: To direct staff to return with an update on the Manhattan Beach Pier closure to fishing and a recommendation to enable the City Council to make a more informed decision regarding any changes Hermosa Beach should make regarding fishing from its pier. Motion Fangary, supported by Barragan and Tucker. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned, in memory of Paul Matthies, Angela Peterson and Earl Diller, on Wednesday, July 9, 2014, at the hour of 2:13 a.m. to the Regular meeting of Tuesday, July 22, 2014, which begins with a Study Session at 6 p.m. _______________________________ ________________________________ City Clerk Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 07-22-14 Page 14032 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, July 22, 2014, at the hour of 6:10 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present:Barragan, Fangary, Petty, Tucker, Mayor DiVirgilio Absent:None PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Mayor DiVirgilio OVERVIEW OF HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT (HIA): (a)Summary of Review Process; Council Questions City Manager Bakaly said that the draft of the re-issued Health Impact Assessment had been released and the consultant was available for Council questions. Dr. Mary McDaniel, Intrinsik (formerly of McDaniel Lambert Scientists), explained the process and the differences between the original report and the new one. She introduced Dr. Chris Ollson of Intrinsik. Dr. Ollson said they had been called in to help when the report was withdrawn by Dr. McDaniel and that their work had been subjected to a third party peer review by Dr. Elizabeth Hodges Snyder. Both Dr. Ollson and Dr. McDaniel responded to Council questions. (b) Consultant Overview of Health Impact Assessment; Council Questions; Questions from the Public Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Name indistinct Andre Sharp Name indistinct George Schmeltzer Jeff Duclos Amy Roth, E&B Scott Hebl Dave Andrews Trevor Thompson Dr. Lisa Santora, Beach Cities Health District Bruce Jaffie Lauren Pizer The meeting recessed at 7:48 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:03 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Mayor DiVirgilio City Council Minutes 07-22-14 Page 14033 ROLL CALL: Present:Barragan, Fangary, Petty, Tucker, Mayor DiVirgilio Absent:None CLOSED SESSION REPORT – None ANNOUNCEMENTS – Councilmember Fangary spoke of attending a recent community event held by Strand and Pier Holding Co., LLC, proposed developers of the former Mermaid property, adding that the project would be discussed at the Council meeting of July 29, 2014. Noting that Fire Chief Lantzer was on vacation, the Council unanimously directed that item 6c be continued to the July 29 meeting. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS REDONDO BEACH MAYOR STEVE ASPEL TO PRESENT AN UPDATE ON REDONDO BEACH MONITORING OF AES CORPORATION’S PLANS FOR A NEW POWER PLANT Mr. Aspel presented the update, urged unanimous support from the City Council and responded to Council questions. REDONDO BEACH MAYOR STEVE ASPEL TO PRESENT AN UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE HERONDO STREET/HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Redondo Beach Mayo Aspel presented the update, with assistance from Mike Witzansky, Redondo’s interim Assistant City Manager, citing many benefits to both cities as a result of the completed project. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: 1.ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Sylvia Lauterbach Jim Hannon Michael Fleischer George Konstantouros Tavin Segal SaraJane Bacallao and Sophia Pizer Isabella Bacallao Rob Saemann Joe Galliani, South Bay Climate 350 and South Bay Bicycle Coalition George Barks Alex Gray Mariano Alvarez City Council Minutes 07-22-14 Page 14034 Sarah Sikich, Heal the Bay Jose Bacallao Jeff Duclos (a)Letter from Howard Longacre dated July 15, 2014 regarding “Mermaid Properties” development concerns. No one came forward to address the Council on this matter. Action: To receive and file the letter, with direction to staff to forward a copy of the letter to the proposed developers. Motion Tucker, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 2.CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (j). Motion Tucker, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (a)RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on February 25, 2014; and 2) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on February 26, 2014. Action: To approve as presented the minutes of the City Council’s Regular meeting of February 25, 2014 and Adjourned Regular meeting of February 26, 2014. (b)RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY CHECK REGISTERS. 1) July 03, 2014 (Check Nos. 74237 through 74381, 457111, 461169, 462055, 462145, 495444, 495488 and 7032014.) 2) July 03, 2014 (Check No. 74382) 3) July 10, 2014 (Check Nos. 74383 through 74495, and 147592.) Action: To ratify the check registers. (c)RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file tentative future agenda items. (d)RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE MEMORANDUM FROM FINANCE DIRECTOR VIKI COPELAND AND CITY TREASURER KAREN NOWICKI REGARDING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT, THE CASH BALANCE REPORT, AND THE CITY TREASURER’S REPORT FOR JUNE 2014. City Council Minutes 07-22-14 Page 14035 Action: To receive and file the memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland and City Treasurer Karen Nowicki regarding the Revenue and Expenditure Report, the Cash Balance Report, and the City Treasurer’s Report for June 2014. (e)RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 15, 2014. Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of July 15, 2014. (f)RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #72237 FOR A 2-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 332 OCEAN VIEW DRIVE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Ken Robertson dated July 15, 2014. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 14-6909, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 72237, FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF A TWO-UNIT CONDOMINIUM LOCATED AT 332 OCEAN VIEW DRIVE IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA.” (g)RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE PROJECT STATUS REPORT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Frank Senteno dated July 14, 2014. Action: To receive and file project status report as of June 30, 2014. (h)RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT THE WORK PERFORMED BY SURFSIDE RESTORATION WATERPROOFING, INC. FOR THE CIP NO. 13-663 AS COMPLETE; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION; AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO RELEASE RETENTION PAYMENT TO SURFSIDE RESTORATION WATERPROOFING, INC. (NO EARLIER THAN 35 DAYS FOLLOWING FILING OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION). Memorandum from Public Works Director Frank Senteno dated July 15, 2014. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Accept the work performed by Surfside Restoration Waterproofing, Inc. for the CIP No. 13-663 as complete; 2) Authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion; and 3) Authorize staff to release retention payment to Surfside Restoration Waterproofing, Inc. (no earlier than 35 days following filing of Notice of Completion. (i)RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE AN ADDITIONAL $50,000 FOR OIL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DA) LEGAL SERVICES WITH STOEL RIVES LLP; APPROPRIATE FUNDS FROM THE INSURANCE FUND FOR City Council Minutes 07-22-14 Page 14036 PAYMENT OF OIL LEGAL SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $125,000; AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS FROM THE INSURANCE FUND FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ADDITIONAL WORK IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,000 FOR THE OIL PROJECT COST BENEFIT STUDY. Memorandum from City Manager Tom Bakaly dated July 14, 2014. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Authorize an additional $50,000 for Oil Development Agreement (DA) legal services with Stoel Rives, LLP; 2) Appropriate funds from the Insurance Fund for payment of oil legal services in the amount of $125,000; and 3) Appropriate funds from the Insurance Fund for previously approved additional work in the amount of $75,000 for the oil project Cost Benefit Study. (j)RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT THE REVISED RESOLUTION PLACING DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS ON THE COUNTY PROPERTY TAX ROLL AS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, AMENDED WITH A NON-SUBSTANTIVE LANGUAGE CHANGE AS REQUIRED BY THE COUNTY. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 17, 2014. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 14-6910, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY ASSESSOR TO SET UP A NEW HAULER ACCOUNT AND FUND NUMBER FOR ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES (ATHENS SERVICES) IN ORDER TO INCLUDE DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE COLLECTED AT THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS COUNTY TAXES; AND TO INCLUDE DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS FROM CONSOLIDATED DISPOSAL SERVICE (CDS) TO THEIR EXISTING FUND NUMBER 168.86 (HERMOSA BCH DEL REFUSE CDS) AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE COLLECTED AT THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS COUNTY TAXES.” At 9:16 p.m., the order of the agenda moved to Public Hearing item 5b. 3.CONSENT ORDINANCES – None 4.ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION – None 5.PUBLIC HEARINGS (a)CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING TO JULY 29, 2014 REGARDING THE OIL DRILLING AND PRODUCTION PROJECT PROPOSED BY E&B NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CORP. TO CONSIDER PLACING A MEASURE ON THE NOVEMBER 4, 2014 BALLOT FOR THE VOTERS TO CONSIDER WHETHER TO APPROVE THE PROJECT AND ADOPT AN City Council Minutes 07-22-14 Page 14037 ORDINANCE APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AMENDMENTS TO THE HERMOSA BEACH GENERAL PLAN/COASTAL LAND USE PLAN AND MUNICIPAL CODE AND A PIPELINE FRANCHISE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Ken Robertson dated July 17, 2014. Supplemental emails from Barbara Ellman and Dave Andrews, both dated July 22, 2014. (As recommended by staff, and by Council consensus, this item was considered after Municipal Matter Item 6(d) – Oil Project Update.) City Attorney Jenkins responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 2:45 a.m. No one came forward to address the Council on this item. Action: To continue the public hearing to the City Council meeting of July 29, 2014, at 7:30 p.m., as recommended by the City Attorney. Motion Barragan, second Fangary. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (b)ADOPTION OF MTA LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONFORMANCE SELF- CERTIFICATION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Ken Robertson dated July 17, 2014. Community Development Director Robertson presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 9:17 p.m. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 9:17 p.m. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 14-6911, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089.” Motion Petty, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 6.MUNICIPAL MATTERS (a)OPTIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CERTIFICATION OF AES REDONDO ENERGY PLANT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Ken Robertson dated July 16, 2014. Supplemental memorandum from Director Robertson dated July 21, 2014. Community Development Director Robertson presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Bakaly and City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 07-22-14 Page 14038 Jon Welner, Partner, Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Mitchell (LLP/Redondo’s attorney), came forward to respond to Council questions and discuss the matter of Hermosa becoming an intervener regarding the proposed project. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Leslie Campeggi, co-founder nopowerplant.com Jim Sullivan Joe Galliani Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Receive and file the information provided with regard to the AES Power Plant (also known as the “Redondo Beach Energy Project”); and 2) Formally participate in the AES proceedings before the California Energy Commission as an intervenor, utilizing the piggy-back option and setting a monetary cap of $20,000 for any staff work that may be needed, with direction to staff to report back in September. Motion Fangary, second Barragan. The motion carried 3-2, noting the dissenting votes of Petty and Tucker. (b)HERONDO STREET/HARBOR DRIVE GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Frank Senteno dated July 8, 2014. Public Works Director Senteno presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Bakaly also responded to Council questions. Tim Shea, Director of Public Works, City of Redondo Beach, came forward to respond to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Michael Fleischer Julian Katz Walt Kasha Jeff Duclos George Barks George Schmeltzer Sean Guthrie, Blue Zones Project Livability Committee member Andrea Giancoli, Blue Zones Project/Beach Cities Health District Gila Katz Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Receive and file the Herondo Street/Harbor Drive Gateway Improvement Project submitted by the City of Redondo Beach; and 2) Authorize the Director of Public Works to negotiate the disbursement of funds, not to exceed $21,532, from the General Fund that have been appropriated for “CIP 14-128 Street Improvements – Various Locations” to the City of Redondo Beach for the rehabilitation of Herondo Street within City Council Minutes 07-22-14 Page 14039 Hermosa’s boundary; with additional direction to staff regarding the inclusion of Hermosa Beach signage. Motion Petty, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (c)PIER USE AND POSSIBLE FISHING RESTRICTIONS. Memorandum from Fire Chief David Lantzer dated July 16, 2014. Supplemental email from Chris Karkenny dated July 17, 2014. Supplemental email from Marv Cross dated July 18, 2014. Supplemental emails from Dennis Duke Noor, Jacqueline Easton and Peggy Nisen, all dated July 19, 2014. Supplemental email from Greg Maffei dated July 21, 2014. This item was continued to the next meeting. (d)STATUS REPORT ON E&B’S PROPOSED OIL DRILLING AND PRODUCTION PROJECT; CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ELECTION TIMING WHICH MAY ALSO INCLUDE AN AGREEMENT WITH E&B ON IMPLEMENTATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT; POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO SUBCOMMITTEE REGARDING NEGOTIATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHICH MAY ALSO INCLUDE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT; AND/OR DIRECTION ON OTHER MATTERS CONCERNING THE PROJECT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Ken Robertson dated July 15, 2014. Supplemental email from Marieke Miller dated July 18, 2014. Supplemental emails from Dave Andrews, Tom Northrup, Barbara Ellman, and Scott Frantz, all dated July 22, 2014. Supplemental revised implementation agreement prepared by City Attorney Mike Jenkins and presented at the meeting. Mayor DiVirgilio updated the Council on recent negotiations, including conversations he had today with E&B president Steve Layton and City Attorney Jenkins. The revised implementation agreement prepared by City Attorney Jenkins was then presented for review by all parties. At 11:17 p.m., the meeting recessed. At 11:48 p.m., the meeting reconvened. City Attorney Jenkins pointed out the differences between the agreement contained in the packet and the one presented this evening, to which he proposed additional modifications. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Kevin Sousa George Schmeltzer Scott Hebl Martha Logan Jeff Craig Jose Bacallao Barbara Ellman City Council Minutes 07-22-14 Page 14040 Walt Kasha JR Reviczky Jim Sullivan George Barks Phil Friedl Sidra Wieder Mike Collins Michael Fleischer Dency Nelson David Keane Sarah Sikich, Heal the Bay Michael Binder Stacey Armato Dave Andrews Lauren Pizer Mains Craig Cadwallader, Surfrider Foundation, South Bay Chapter Joe Galliani Mariano Alvarez Phyllis Pennings Julian Katz Chris Prenter City Attorney Jenkins and City Manager Bakaly responded to Council questions. Steve Layton, E&B President, came forward to respond to Council questions. Michael Mills, Partner, Stoel Rives, LLP/Hermosa’s oil and gas attorney, also came forward to respond to Council questions. Proposed Action: To: 1) Receive and file the report; 2) Direct the City Clerk’s Office to prepare the documents required to place the initiative on the ballot for the November 4, 2014 election; and 3) Direct the subcommittee to continue negotiations with E&B if desired. Motion Fangary, second Tucker. The motion was subsequently replaced by the substitute motion shown below (after the recess). Nicki Carlsen, Alston & Bird, LLP/E&B attorney, and Steve Layton, E&B president, came forward to respond to Council questions related to the terms of the agreement, with Mr. Layton agreeing to a March 3, 2015 election and the provision to not sue the City. At 2:28 a.m., the meeting recessed. At 2:33 a.m., the meeting reconvened. Nicki Carlsen and Steve Layton responded to additional Council questions regarding the terms of the agreement. City Council Minutes 07-22-14 Page 14041 Action: To direct staff to execute the Agreement to Implement both the Settlement and Reimbursement Agreements, consistent with the amended terms agreed upon by E&B at tonight’s meeting: 1) Term 1 (Special Election) was changed to set March 3, 2015 as the special election date for the proposed oil measure; 2) Term 2 (Development Agreement, Legislative Amendments and Ballot Measure) was deleted in its entirety; and 3) Term 3 (Agreement not to sue) was revised to delete the last phrase starting with “including additional peer review…..” and was then appropriately renumbered to reflect the above-noted deletion of the second term. Motion Fangary, second Petty. The (supplemental) motion carried 4-1, noting the dissenting vote of Tucker. At 2:44 a.m., the order of the agenda moved to item 5a. 7.MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER – None 8.MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL – None 9.OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL (a)Request by Councilmember Fangary to have staff evaluate the need to regulate the use of drones on the beach, Pier Plaza, parks, and other public areas. City Manager Bakaly said this matter was scheduled to be an agenda item at a meeting in September. Councilmember Fangary withdrew his request. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Wednesday, July 23, 2014, at the hour of 2:50 a.m. to the Adjourned Regular meeting of Tuesday, July 29, 2014 at 6:00 p.m. _______________________________ ________________________________ City Clerk Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 07-29-14 Page 14042 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, July 29, 2014, at the hour of 6:07 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Mayor DiVirgilio ROLL CALL: Present:Barragan, Fangary, Petty, Tucker, Mayor DiVirgilio Absent:None CLOSED SESSION REPORT – None ANNOUNCEMENTS – Councilmember Fangary commented on the 2015 Reebok Crossfit Games team beach event held July 23; announced the International Surf Festival, July 30-August 3, and the Summer Concert Series, August 3-August 24; and asked that tonight’s meeting be adjourned in memory of Nick Fagnano. Mayor pro tem Tucker invited everyone to the upcoming Navy Days events, and acknowledged JR Reviczky, who serves on the Navy Days Board of Directors. Mayor DiVirgilio presented outgoing Public Works Director Frank Senteno with a Certificate of Recognition for his service and accomplishments. Mr. Senteno, who accepted a position in another city, said it had been an honor to work for Hermosa Beach and gave a special nod to fellow staff. Mayor pro tem Tucker also thanked Director Senteno for his service and accomplishments. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS –None PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: 1.ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time was: Dency Nelson 2.CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (d) with the exception of the following item, which was removed for discussion in item 4, but is shown in order for clarity: 2(d) Fangary. Motion Tucker, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (a)RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS AND REFER THEM TO THE CITY’S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR. Memorandum from Assistant to the City Manager Diane Strickfaden dated July 22, 2014. City Council Minutes 07-29-14 Page 14043 CLAIMANT:KHANLIAN, MARCO DATE OF LOSS:02-22-14 DATE FILED:07-22-14 ALLEGATION:PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMANT:HEDANI, LYNN DATE OF LOSS:07-03-14 DATE FILED:07-22-14 ALLEGATION:PROPERTY DAMAGE Action: To deny the above-noted claims and refer them to the City’s Liability Claims Administrator, as recommended by staff. (b)RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CLASS SPECIFICATION FOR CRIME AND INTELLIGENCE ANALYST. Memorandum from Assistant to the City Manager Diane Strickfaden dated July 23, 2014. Action: To approve the class specification for Crime and Intelligence Analyst, as recommended by staff. (c)RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CLASS SPECIFICATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER.Memorandum from Assistant to the City Manager Diane Strickfaden dated July 23, 2014. Action: To approve the class specification for Community Services Division Manager, as recommended by staff. (d)RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Fangary for separate discussion later in the meeting. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Barbara Ellman City Manager Bakaly responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Motion Fangary, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 7:05 p.m., the order of the agenda moved to item 6a. 3.CONSENT ORDINANCES – None 4.ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION City Council Minutes 07-29-14 Page 14044 Item 2(d) was heard at this time but is shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. 5.PUBLIC HEARINGS (a)CANCELLATION OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE OIL DRILLING AND PRODUCTION PROJECT PROPOSED BY E&B NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CORP. TO CONSIDER PLACING A MEASURE ON THE BALLOT FOR THE VOTERS TO CONSIDER WHETHER TO APPROVE THE PROJECT AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AMENDMENTS TO THE HERMOSA BEACH GENERAL PLAN/COASTAL LAND USE PLAN AND MUNICIPAL CODE AND A PIPELINE FRANCHISE. (Continued from meeting of July 22, 2014)Memorandum from Community Development Director Ken Robertson dated July 23, 2014. Community Development Director Robertson presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:05 p.m. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 8:05 p.m. Action: To cancel the public hearing scheduled for this evening and re-notice it for a later date due to the Council’s decision at the July 22 meeting to move the election date of the oil measure to March 2015. Motion Tucker, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 8:08 p.m., the order of the agenda moved to item 6(b). 6.MUNICIPAL MATTERS (a)PIER USE AND POSSIBLE FISHING RESTRICTIONS. (Continued from meeting of July 22, 2014)Memorandum from Fire Chief David Lantzer dated July 23, 2014. Supplemental emails from Joe Imbriano dated July 22, 2014, and from Pete and Tracy Broussinos dated July 24, 2014. Fire Chief Lantzer presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Bakaly also responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Jeff Duclos Frankie Orrala, Heal the Bay Jose Bacallao Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: City Council Minutes 07-29-14 Page 14045 1) Direct staff to work with the Coastal Commission, Dept. of Fish/Wildlife and other stakeholders to review options for pier fishing code revisions; 2) Direct staff to work with Heal the Bay and other community stakeholders throughout the South Bay to facilitate the initiation of an education and outreach program; 3) Provide direction regarding enforcement priorities for the pier; 4) Receive and file this report; and 5) Direct staff to return in September with an update on the Manhattan Beach Council meeting at which pier restrictions will be addressed. Motion Tucker, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 8:04 p.m., the order of the agenda moved to item 5a. (b)APPROVAL OF A “PILOT PARKING PROGRAM” INCORPORATING DEMAND PRICING RATES AND FREE PARKING TRIAL. Memorandum from Management Analyst Nico De Anda-Scaia dated July 15, 2014. Management Analyst De Anda-Scaia presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Bakaly also responded to Council questions. Dave Lowe, Chamber of Commerce, gave a PowerPoint presentation, with assistance from Lori Ford, and responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: To approve the staff recommendation to (1) approve implementation of a 90-day Pilot Parking Program, from September 15 to December 15, 2014, for free two-hour parking on 180 single-space street meters, Monday–Friday, 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.; and (2) authorize demand pricing 8 p.m. to 12 a.m. for the same period on pay-by-space meters in lots A, B and C, with an hourly rate increase pending approval of the Coastal Commission. Motion Petty. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Action: To: 1) Approve the implementation of a 90-day Pilot Parking Program, from September 15 to December 15, 2014, for free two-hour parking on 180 single-space street meters, Monday–Friday, within the three-hour period of 11 a.m. to 2 p.m., with enforcement of meter posted time limits; 2) Authorize demand pricing on 180 single-space street meters for the four- hour period of 8 p.m. to 12 a.m. daily for the same duration as the Pilot Parking Program, increasing hourly meter rates between 25 and 50 cents, pending approval by the California Coastal Commission; and 3) Authorize demand pricing in lots A, B, and C for the six-hour period of 8 p.m. to 2 a.m. daily for the same duration as the Pilot Parking Program, increasing hourly rates between 25 to 50 cents, pending approval by the California Coastal Commission. Motion Barragan, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 9:28 p.m., the meeting recessed. City Council Minutes 07-29-14 Page 14046 At 9:42 p.m., the meeting reconvened. (c)CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY STRAND AND PIER HOLDING COMPANY, LLC TO STUDY USE AND INCLUSION OF CITY PROPERTY IN A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR A HOTEL PROJECT, AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION REGARDING THE DOWNTOWN CORE REVITALIZATION STRATEGY OR RELATED MATTERS. Memorandum from Community Development Director Ken Robertson dated July 24, 2014. Supplemental email from Howard Longacre dated July 27, 2014. Supplemental parking map dated July 29, 2014. Senior Planner Pam Townsend presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Bakaly and City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. Mark Bolour, Balour and Associates CEO, and Dana Sayles, three6ixty AICP, came forward to address their request and respond to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Dave Lowe Dency Nelson Ron Newman Mayor DiVirgilio and Councilmembers Barragan, Fangary and Petty disclosed ex parte communications. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Grant consent to include Parking Lot B and Beach Drive in a development application as stated herein; and 2) Direct staff to return for discussion and possible adoption of the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy including guidelines for catalyst projects. Motion Petty, second Fangary. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 7.MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER – None 8.MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL – None 9.OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL – None ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned, in memory of Nick Fagnano, on Tuesday, July 29, 2014, at the hour of 11:46 p.m. to the Adjourned Regular meeting (Study Session on Pier Plaza Use and Enforcement) on Tuesday, August 26, 2014 at 5 p.m. _______________________________ ________________________________ City Clerk Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 08-26-14 Page 14047 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, August 26, 2014, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. for the purpose of conducting a study session. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Mayor DiVirgilio ROLL CALL: Present:Barragan, Fangary, Petty, Tucker, Mayor DiVirgilio Absent:None The meeting recessed at 5:14 p.m. due to technical issues with audio transmission. The meeting reconvened at 5:22 p.m. when the equipment problem was corrected. POLICY DISCUSSIONS: 1.LATE-NIGHT ALCOHOL BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENTS ORDINANCE; FOOD TO ALCOHOL SALES RATIOS FOR RESTAURANTS WITH ON-SALE ALCOHOL; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW PROCESS. Memorandum from Community Development Director Ken Robertson dated August 20, 2014. Supplemental memoranda from Director Robertson dated August 25, 2014 and August 26, 2014. Supplemental summary of 50/50 Audit from Councilmember Barragan received August 25, 2014. City Manager Bakaly said the study session is intended to allow the Council to have a broad policy discussion before addressing the matter later this evening during the regular meeting (agenda item 5.a.). Director Robertson presented the staff report; spoke of the need for Council direction when the agenda item (5.a.) is considered at the regular meeting; and responded to Council questions. Shelli Margolin-Mayer, Economic Development Officer, addressed information about creating a Sociable City Plan, and responded to Council questions. Councilmember Fangary disclosed his ex parte communications. It was the consensus of the Council to focus this evening on only this item, and all Councilmembers expressed their views on the topic. The three items shown below were not addressed. 2.OUTDOOR DINING ENCROACHMENTS ON PIER PLAZA. Supplemental memorandum from Community Development Director Ken Robertson dated August 25, 2014. 3. RETAIL DISPLAY ENCROACHMENTS ON PIER PLAZA. Supplemental email from Dennis Jarvis received August 25, 2014. City Council Minutes 08-26-14 Page 14048 4. CODE ENFORCEMENT. Supplemental summary from Councilmember Barragan received August 25, 2014. Supplemental memorandum from Community Development Director Robertson received August 26, 2014. PUBLIC COMMENT: Coming forward to address the Council at this time was: Dave Lowe – submitted information on the 50/50 (food-to alcohol ratio) rule. ADJOURNMENT - The Adjourned Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned August 26, 2014, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. to the Regular meeting of the same date, scheduled to take place at 7 p.m. _______________________________ City Clerk Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0674 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommended Action: To ratify the following check registers. Attachments: 1.Check Register 9/3/15 2.Check Register 9/10/15 3.Check Register 9/10/15a Approved: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 78990 9/3/2015 17339 3V SIGNS AND GRAPHICS LLC 5562 City Hall Garden Signs 001-6101-4201 454.40 Total : 454.40 78991 9/3/2015 09366 AQUA FLO 813835 Irrigation Supplies/Aug15 001-6101-4309 284.27 814460 Irrigation Supplies/Aug15 001-6101-4309 336.18 Total : 620.45 78992 9/3/2015 16510 AT AND T 000006814234 Long Dist Charges 6/13/15 - 7/12/15 001-1121-4304 0.07 001-1132-4304 0.01 001-1141-4304 0.13 001-1201-4304 0.55 001-1202-4304 0.20 001-1203-4304 0.18 001-2101-4304 3.07 001-2201-4304 0.92 001-4101-4304 0.19 001-4201-4304 0.79 001-4202-4304 0.84 001-4204-4321 0.09 001-4601-4304 0.31 001-1204-4304 0.67 001-3302-4304 0.12 715-1206-4304 0.06 Total : 8.20 78993 9/3/2015 16660 ATHENS SERVICES HB4040180715-2 Citywide Sweep/Clean/Jul15 001-3104-4201 1,329.91 001-3304-4201 195.70 001-3301-4201 7,172.45 HB4040180715-3 4th of July Extra Porter Srvcs 001-3301-4201 1,266.80 1Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 9,964.86 78993 9/3/2015 16660 ATHENS SERVICES 78994 9/3/2015 17271 BARROWS, PATRICK PO 7392 Instruct Pmt/5440/5577/78 001-4601-4221 1,324.40 001-2024 59.50 Total : 1,383.90 78995 9/3/2015 16371 BEACH GIRL PROPERTIES LLC 143 Parking Meters - 70 14th Street/Aug15 001-3842 650.00 Total : 650.00 78996 9/3/2015 14513 BEACHVOLLEYBALLCAMPS COM PO 7391 Instruct Pmt/5644 001-4601-4221 392.00 Total : 392.00 78997 9/3/2015 06409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS 547522 Emulsion Buckets/School Mix 001-3104-4309 201.10 Total : 201.10 78998 9/3/2015 17562 BOWEN, TIMOTHY D PO 7346 Instruct Pmt/5491-5492 001-4601-4221 3,052.90 Total : 3,052.90 78999 9/3/2015 00163 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 1267352 Prisoner Laundry/Aug15 001-2101-4306 83.33 Total : 83.33 79000 9/3/2015 09614 BROMBERG, GEORGE 80715 300&500' Notice/Aug21stPlanCommMeet 001-4101-4201 3,998.00 Total : 3,998.00 79001 9/3/2015 00034 BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORP 298003 Tow Away/No Parking Signs 001-4601-4305 406.77 Total : 406.77 79002 9/3/2015 00262 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 4850 Council Nametags & Nameplate 001-1101-4305 134.07 2Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79002 9/3/2015 (Continued)00262 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 4861 Emergncy Prep Committee Nameplates 001-2201-4309 71.94 Total : 206.01 79003 9/3/2015 03027 CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE PO 7257 Train/Higgins/Smith/Internal Affairs 001-2101-4312 682.00 Total : 682.00 79004 9/3/2015 19484 CHAFIN, KIM PO 7389 Train Reimb/UCLA/Law 866 001-4101-4317 359.00 Total : 359.00 79005 9/3/2015 09694 CLEAN ENERGY CE11785797 Compressed Natural Gas/Jul15 715-4202-4310 22.80 715-4201-4310 30.40 Total : 53.20 79006 9/3/2015 18570 CODE PUBLISHING INC 50619 Municipal Code Website Update/Aug15 001-1121-4201 67.35 Total : 67.35 79007 9/3/2015 14850 CORDOVA, JOHN PO 7407 Reimb/Surface Pro Accessories for 001-4202-4305 186.35 Total : 186.35 79008 9/3/2015 13701 CURRAN, GERARD PO 7371 Clean Drains in Jail Cells 001-4204-4201 170.00 Total : 170.00 79009 9/3/2015 12991 DELL MARKETING LP XJRDP5X84 GIS Analyst Specialized Workstation 715-1206-5402 2,183.61 Total : 2,183.61 79010 9/3/2015 11449 DEWEY PEST CONTROL Acct 1233239 Sewer Rat Abatement/Aug15 160-3102-4201 200.00 Acct 759408 Pest Control Services/Aug15 001-4204-4201 651.00 3Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 851.00 79010 9/3/2015 11449 DEWEY PEST CONTROL 79011 9/3/2015 13835 DONALD WENTWORTH D15-10435 Badge & Motor Wing Stickers 001-2101-4305 717.95 Total : 717.95 79012 9/3/2015 19358 DOVE, GUY TR 449 Per Diem Per Diem/Field Training Officer 001-2101-4312 75.00 Total : 75.00 79013 9/3/2015 01962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 5-135-37142 E&B Oil Settlement Check Shipping 001-1202-4305 21.78 Total : 21.78 79014 9/3/2015 06344 FIRST CALL STAFFING SERVICES 00709-150054 Temp Services W/E 8/16/15 001-4201-4112 465.00 Total : 465.00 79015 9/3/2015 15406 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1119664-01 Air Chipping Hammer Hose Accessory 715-3102-4311 50.87 Total : 50.87 79016 9/3/2015 16934 GOLD COAST TOURS 323945 Boomers Excursion Overtime Costs 145-3409-4201 73.59 323946 Boomers Excursion Overtime Costs 145-3409-4201 73.59 Total : 147.18 79017 9/3/2015 10466 GRAHAM CO.33162 Emergency Lights Qtrly Maint/15-16 001-3304-4201 1,160.00 Total : 1,160.00 79018 9/3/2015 16209 GREENLEAF, KENNETH 2080 Narcotics Training/K9 Keef 170-2105-4317 1,000.00 Total : 1,000.00 79019 9/3/2015 02102 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 29268 CIP 14-173 8th St Improve/Jul15 122-8173-4201 1,020.00 4Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 1,020.00 79019 9/3/2015 02102 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 79020 9/3/2015 08673 HIGGINS, ROBERT PO 7258 Meal Reimb/Internal Affairs 001-2101-4312 45.00 Total : 45.00 79021 9/3/2015 07547 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSC 0024337-IN Sales Tax Audit Srvcs/1st Qtr 001-1202-4201 1,343.81 Total : 1,343.81 79022 9/3/2015 00679 IAPMO Member No. 412 Membership/B. Rollins/Feb15-Feb16 001-4201-4315 150.00 Total : 150.00 79023 9/3/2015 16742 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS IN-000547605 Office Supplies/Aug15 001-1101-4305 33.36 Total : 33.36 79024 9/3/2015 02458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 249387-00 Electrical Supplies/Aug15 105-2601-4309 786.45 001-2021 14.70 001-2022 -14.70 249759-00 Electrical Supplies - Aug15 001-2022 -6.08 001-8614-4201 326.59 001-2021 6.08 249822-00 Electrical Supplies - Aug15 001-8614-4201 76.11 001-2021 1.42 001-2022 -1.42 Total : 1,189.15 79025 9/3/2015 19314 IPS GROUP INC 12964 Smart Meter Fees/Jul15 001-3302-4201 6,016.50 Total : 6,016.50 79026 9/3/2015 12151 JAHNG, CHRISTOPHER Y PO 7326 Instruct Pmt/5667/Deduct Ovrpmt 001-4601-4221 525.00 5Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 525.00 79026 9/3/2015 12151 JAHNG, CHRISTOPHER Y 79027 9/3/2015 12190 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC INV-020720 Valley Park/Trolley Assembly 001-6101-4309 366.63 Total : 366.63 79028 9/3/2015 10677 LAWRENCE, LARRY CDBG July 2015 CDBG/Staff Augmentation/Jul15 001-4101-4201 289.00 Skechers July 2015 Skechers/Staff Augmentation/Jul15 001-4101-4201 586.50 Total : 875.50 79029 9/3/2015 00167 LEARNED LUMBER B460478 Lumber/Forcible Entry Props 001-2024 1,066.46 B466970 Lumber 001-8614-4201 29.33 B467692 Joist Hanger/Knife Blades 001-4204-4309 48.24 B467793 Lumber 001-8614-4201 29.33 B468135 Solid Pine Cove 001-3104-4309 2.79 Total : 1,176.15 79030 9/3/2015 02175 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1407810 Legal, RE: Personnel Matter/Jul15 001-1203-4201 2,110.00 Total : 2,110.00 79031 9/3/2015 02175 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE PO 7421 Train/L. Phillips/Evaluate IA Process 001-2101-4317 60.00 Total : 60.00 79032 9/3/2015 06603 LOS ANGELES, CITY OF 94 PAG16000004 Commuter Express Route 438-14/15 001-2024 13,825.46 Total : 13,825.46 79033 9/3/2015 18274 MAGNUM VENTURE PARTNERS PO 7331 Instruct Pmt/5667 6Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79033 9/3/2015 (Continued)18274 MAGNUM VENTURE PARTNERS 001-4601-4221 787.50 Total : 787.50 79034 9/3/2015 14041 MC GOWAN, P.E., KATHLEEN HB-FY1516-001 MS4 Permit Consult/Jul15 161-3109-4201 3,635.00 Total : 3,635.00 79035 9/3/2015 19486 MCSORLEY, LEANNE 2000336.003 Class Proration for Late Instructor 001-2111 37.00 Total : 37.00 79036 9/3/2015 18071 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SERVICES 46109 Exterior Landscape Maintenance/Jul15 001-6101-4201 16,190.00 46110 Exterior Landscape Maintenance/Jul15 105-2601-4201 3,306.00 Total : 19,496.00 79037 9/3/2015 13114 OFFICE DEPOT 786575814001 Office Supplies/Aug15 001-4601-4305 137.33 Total : 137.33 79038 9/3/2015 19485 OPENGOV INC 1593 Fiscal Transparency Software for Website 001-1201-4201 7,000.00 Total : 7,000.00 79039 9/3/2015 11323 P.R. DIAMOND PRODUCTS INC.0037784-IN Concrete Saw & Blade 001-3104-4309 999.00 Total : 999.00 79040 9/3/2015 14693 PARS PUBLIC AGENCY RETIREMENT, US BANK32196 PARS Admin Plan No. SE-ARS07A/Jun15 001-2024 300.00 Total : 300.00 79041 9/3/2015 00608 PEP BOYS 08141035559 Auto Supplies/Aug15 715-3104-4311 94.00 08141035750 Auto Supplies/Aug15 715-3102-4311 141.14 7Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 235.14 79041 9/3/2015 00608 PEP BOYS 79042 9/3/2015 15103 PLUMBERS DEPOT INC PD-25993 Cork Bag 160-3102-4309 47.39 Total : 47.39 79043 9/3/2015 17676 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 40947333 Mats and Shop Towels 001-2201-4309 27.18 40947334 Mats 001-4204-4309 46.28 40947335 Mats 001-3302-4309 29.78 40947336 Mats 001-4204-4309 33.68 40947337 Shop Towels 715-4206-4309 19.68 40947338 Uniform Rental 001-4202-4314 52.74 40947339 Mats 001-2101-4309 33.08 40947340 Mats/Shop Towels 001-3104-4309 24.18 40949683 Uniform Rental 001-4202-4314 44.56 Total : 311.16 79044 9/3/2015 02715 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER INC 5616217 Do Not Cross Tape/Eye Wash Adapter 001-2101-4305 391.38 Total : 391.38 79045 9/3/2015 04800 RAY, JAY VINCENT PO 7388 Instruct Pmt/5676/94 001-4601-4221 4,000.85 Total : 4,000.85 79046 9/3/2015 03282 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF 559377 City Prosecutor Services/Jul15 001-1132-4201 16,667.00 8Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79046 9/3/2015 (Continued)03282 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF 559390 Water Monitoring/2014 Rain Year 161-3109-4251 5,573.41 Total : 22,240.41 79047 9/3/2015 01070 RIO HONDO REGIONAL TRAINING CR TR 449 Registration Train/Dove/Field Training Officer 001-2101-4317 38.00 Total : 38.00 79048 9/3/2015 18596 ROCK N ROLL CAR WASH LLC 122 City Car Washes/Jun15 715-2101-4311 225.00 715-2201-4311 15.00 715-4201-4311 5.00 715-3302-4311 5.00 715-4202-4311 15.00 126 City Car Washes/Jul15 715-2101-4311 190.00 715-3302-4311 15.00 715-4202-4311 5.00 715-4201-4311 10.00 Total : 485.00 79049 9/3/2015 16425 SAFEWAY INC VONS 435647-073115-2110 Day Camp Potluck Supplies 001-4601-4308 85.69 438679-080615-2110 Staff Meeting Supplies 001-4601-4305 10.00 439046-080715-2110 Day Camp BBQ Supplies 001-4601-4308 40.59 801984-081415-2110 Day Camp Potluck Supplies 001-4601-4308 84.21 802952-081615-2110 Theatre Events/Toilet Paper & Towels 001-4601-4308 19.05 805540-081915-2110 Popsicles for Day Camp 001-4601-4308 15.96 806200-082115-2110 Day Camp Potluck Supplies 001-4601-4308 52.24 9Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79049 9/3/2015 (Continued)16425 SAFEWAY INC VONS 808427-080715-2110 Catalina Excursion Goody Bag Supplies 001-4601-4308 134.02 808429-080715-2110 Senior Center Coffee Supplies 001-4601-4328 49.98 Total : 491.74 79050 9/3/2015 17903 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5149-9 Painting Supplies/Jul15 001-3104-4309 820.33 6168-8 Painting Supplies/Handprint Wall/Aug15 001-1214-4322 31.45 6419-5 Painting Supplies/Aug15 001-3104-4309 127.69 7705-7 Painting Supplies/Aug15 001-3104-4309 44.58 Total : 1,024.05 79051 9/3/2015 19186 SHOOTING RANGE INDUSTRIES LLC 15-115-3 Modular Shooting Range/Retention 153-2106-5405 2,680.35 170-2103-5405 14,357.68 001-2101-5405 2,041.08 Total : 19,079.11 79052 9/3/2015 07158 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 5620007997 Signal Maint/Jul15 001-3104-4201 1,390.31 Total : 1,390.31 79053 9/3/2015 19205 SMITH BROTHERS CRANE RENTAL INV-31037 Crane Rental/AC Unit/Gun Range 001-8614-4201 642.00 Total : 642.00 79054 9/3/2015 19483 SMITH, JAMES PO 7259 Meal Reimb/Internal Affairs 001-2101-4312 45.00 Total : 45.00 79055 9/3/2015 13776 SMITH, STARLA PO 7404 Tuition Reimb/Fall 2015 001-2101-4317 284.48 10Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 284.48 79055 9/3/2015 13776 SMITH, STARLA 79056 9/3/2015 00113 SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER 148272 Fire Suppression Srvc/Fusible Links 001-4204-4201 141.35 Total : 141.35 79057 9/3/2015 00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 2-01-414-1071 Electrical Billing/Aug15 001-4204-4303 3,261.59 2-01-414-2152 Electrical Billing/Aug15 001-6101-4303 473.10 2-01-414-3747 Electrical Billing/Aug15 105-2601-4303 53.56 2-01-414-3994 Electrical Billing/Jul15 160-3102-4303 84.99 2-01-414-4281 Electrical Billing/Aug15 105-2601-4303 394.60 2-01-414-5106 Electrical Billing/Aug15 001-3104-4303 420.58 2-29-332-0750 Electrical Billing/Aug15 105-2601-4303 94.83 Total : 4,783.25 79058 9/3/2015 00171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.PO 7376 Install/Glare Shield/Light Pole 105-2601-4201 172.00 Total : 172.00 79059 9/3/2015 10232 SPICERS PAPER INC 1192494 Letter and legal paper 001-1208-4305 1,411.10 Total : 1,411.10 79060 9/3/2015 18036 SPORTS CAMP MANAGEMENT PO 7393 Instruct Pmt/5478/79/89/90 001-4601-4221 4,159.82 PO 7393 June Instruct Pmt/5478/79/89/90 June 001-2024 113.68 Total : 4,273.50 79061 9/3/2015 16806 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS 12672830 Monitoring Charges/Jul15-Apr16 11Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79061 9/3/2015 (Continued)16806 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS 715-4204-4201 2,300.00 Total : 2,300.00 79062 9/3/2015 10412 STERICYCLE 3003121758 Medical Waste Disposal - Aug15 001-2101-4201 59.85 Total : 59.85 79063 9/3/2015 19082 T MOBILE 946625962 Cell Phones/Aug15 001-2101-4201 460.36 001-2101-4304 240.02 001-3302-4304 50.22 Total : 750.60 79064 9/3/2015 15040 TEAK WAREHOUSE INC 13832 Memorial Bench/K. Keane 001-6101-5402 866.55 Total : 866.55 79065 9/3/2015 13270 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 252-1888580 Investment Safekeeping Srvcs/4th Qtr 001-2024 875.00 Total : 875.00 79066 9/3/2015 15277 TIME WARNER CABLE 8448 30 030 0340764 FD/Cable/Sep15 001-2201-4201 137.54 Total : 137.54 79067 9/3/2015 11102 TORRANCE WHOLESALE NURSERY 370673 Landscape Materials/Aug15 105-2601-4309 138.48 370675 Landscape Materials/Aug15 001-6101-4309 464.34 370687 Landscape Materials/Aug15 001-6101-4309 163.50 521533 Landscape Materials/Aug15 001-6101-4309 299.75 521561 Landscape Materials/Aug15 001-6101-4309 428.37 12Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 13 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79067 9/3/2015 (Continued)11102 TORRANCE WHOLESALE NURSERY 521597 Landscape Materials/Aug15 001-6101-4309 485.50 521598 Landscape Materials/Aug15 001-6101-4309 495.95 521599 Landscape Materials/Aug15 001-6101-4309 495.05 Total : 2,970.94 79068 9/3/2015 00123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE 8/31/15 Statement Hardware Supplies/Aug15 001-2201-4309 83.30 001-3104-4309 423.21 001-4204-4309 941.76 001-6101-4309 946.37 105-2601-4309 504.40 715-4206-4309 168.23 001-2021 99.44 001-2022 -99.44 Total : 3,067.27 79069 9/3/2015 14528 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, PARS #6746019200PO 7289 Aug15 PARS/OPEB Contributions/Aug15 13Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 14 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79069 9/3/2015 (Continued)14528 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, PARS #6746019200 001-1101-4190 200.00 001-1121-4190 715.00 001-1141-4190 19.00 001-1201-4190 1,030.00 001-1202-4190 2,083.00 001-1203-4190 353.00 001-1204-4190 1,780.00 001-1208-4190 413.00 001-2101-4190 30,633.00 001-3104-4190 1,768.00 001-3301-4190 116.00 001-3302-4190 7,483.00 001-4101-4190 1,672.00 001-4201-4190 1,581.00 001-4202-4190 1,665.00 001-4204-4190 1,409.00 001-4601-4190 912.00 001-6101-4190 1,128.00 105-2601-4190 507.00 160-3102-4190 156.00 161-3109-4190 199.00 715-4206-4190 903.00 001-2201-4190 11,062.00 Total : 67,787.00 79070 9/3/2015 18890 UNITED MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS 13050 City-Owned Bldgs Janitorial/Jul15 001-4204-4201 7,612.00 Total : 7,612.00 79071 9/3/2015 18753 UNITED SITE SERVICES 114-3192527 Portable Toilets/Summer Concert Series 001-3301-4201 566.80 114-3209153 Portable Toilets/Summer Concert Series 001-3301-4201 566.80 Total : 1,133.60 79072 9/3/2015 14148 UPS 000023R146345 Return shipment to LN Curtis 14Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 15 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79072 9/3/2015 (Continued)14148 UPS 001-2201-4305 11.67 Total : 11.67 79073 9/3/2015 18666 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 69549305 VoIP Services/EOC Gym/Jul15 001-2201-4304 57.36 69550865 VoIP Services/Yard/Jul15 001-4202-4304 142.74 Total : 200.10 79074 9/3/2015 00015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 310 372-6186 Fax Charges 8/16/15-9/15/15 001-1121-4304 10.72 001-1141-4304 10.72 001-1201-4304 10.72 001-1202-4304 10.72 001-1203-4304 10.72 310 376-6984 Phone Charges 8/16/15-9/15/15 001-1121-4304 31.32 001-1132-4304 5.22 001-1141-4304 7.83 001-1201-4304 71.79 001-1202-4304 69.18 001-1203-4304 14.36 001-1208-4304 5.22 001-2101-4304 418.97 001-2201-4304 144.88 001-4101-4304 70.48 001-4201-4304 62.65 001-4202-4304 133.13 001-4601-4304 103.11 001-1204-4304 96.58 001-3302-4304 45.68 715-1206-4304 24.80 Total : 1,358.80 79075 9/3/2015 09056 VERIZON ONLINE 1160742236 Fiber Optic Line - Aug15 715-1206-4201 227.99 15Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 16 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 227.99 79075 9/3/2015 09056 VERIZON ONLINE 79076 9/3/2015 03209 VERIZON WIRELESS LA 9750485791 New Cell Phone/A. Marks 001-2201-4304 364.49 9750751803 Cell Phone Usage Jul 17-Aug 16 001-2201-4304 82.98 9750751804 Cell Phone Usage/City 001-1201-4304 107.37 9750753081 Cell Phone Usage Jul 17-Aug16 001-2201-4304 711.83 Total : 1,266.67 79077 9/3/2015 19034 VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT R504002622-1 Beach Outfall Equip Rent/Jul15 715-3102-4311 98.10 Total : 98.10 79078 9/3/2015 11219 WESTCHESTER MEDICAL GROUP CH026-7205 Medical Exam 001-1203-4320 270.00 Total : 270.00 79079 9/3/2015 13359 WITTMAN ENTERPRISES LLC 1507062 Amb Transport Billing Ser/Jul15 001-1202-4201 3,696.08 Total : 3,696.08 79080 9/3/2015 16729 ZAPPIA LAW FIRM APC, THE 15-06-30 Legal, RE: Personnel Matters/Jun15 001-2024 14,918.10 Total : 14,918.10 79081 9/3/2015 17569 ZGRAY SPORTS LLC PO 7298 Instruct Pmt/5594/97/99 001-4601-4221 2,184.00 001-2024 147.00 Total : 2,331.00 1593080419 9/3/2015 14691 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 8/31/15 Workers Comp Claims Reimb/Aug15 705-1217-4324 19,973.88 Total : 19,973.88 Bank total : 284,140.56 93 Vouchers for bank code :boa 16Page: 09/03/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 17 4:38:51PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 284,140.56Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 93 "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 17 inclusive, of the check register for 9-3-15 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Finance Director Date 9-14-15 17Page: 09/10/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 5:16:26PM Page:vchlist Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79146 9/10/2015 14642 VASILJ CONSTRUCTION, INC 5 Sewer Improvement Services/ Apr-May 15 150-2024 26,125.00 301-2024 93,223.50 Total : 119,348.50 Bank total : 119,348.50 1 Vouchers for bank code :boa 119,348.50Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 1 "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 1 inclusive, of the check register for 9-10-15 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Finance Director Date 9-14-15 1Page: Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0679 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Recommended Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items. Attachments: Tentative Future Agenda Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ September 15, 2015 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 24, 2015 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS OCTOBER 13, 2015 @ 5:00PM CLOSED SESSION: CITY MANAGER PERFORMANCE REVIEW OCTOBER 13, 2015 CONSENT CALENDAR Award of Contract – Public Works Plan Checking Services Public Works Director Tower Demolition Public Works Director Equipment Apparatus Agreement Fire Chief Approval of 2015-2016 MOU with Bargaining Units Interim Human Resources Manager Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of August 4, 2015 Acting Recreation Manager PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:30 PM Review and Reconsideration of CUP 15-8 / PARK 15-5 -- Parking Plan and Conditional Use Permit to add 246 square feet of storage area to an existing restaurant with on-sale beer and wine and exclude said storage area from parking calculations; and to allow for on-sale beer and wine until 11:00 p.m. daily in connection with a proposed new restaurant at 1342 Hermosa Avenue, Brat and Brau; and determination that the project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Community Development Director CUP Appeal – Laurel Tavern Community Development Director MUNICIPAL MATTERS Minutes Discussion Update City Clerk Parking Update: Update on Installation of Parking Meters in certain 15 minute “Green Zones” Phase 2 Parking Meter Installation Update - (Phase 1 status, Multi Space Meter Trial & Install, Mobile Pay-by-Phone Software and other upgrades, etc.) Community Services Manager Litigation Update Process City Attorney Adoption of 2015-2020-2030 Strategic Plan City Manager AES Intervener Role Discussion Community Development Director 8th Street Update Public Works Director MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER Monterey Sharrow Update Public Works Director 2 OCTOBER 27, 2015 @ 5:30PM PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEWS OCTOBER 27, 2015 @ 6:00PM STUDY SESSION: STREET PAVING PROGRAM AND GOULD AVENUE OCTOBER 27, 2015 PRESENTATIONS PRESENTATION BY PARTICIPANTS IN “THIS IS MY CITY” SUMMER CAMP CONSENT CALENDAR Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of October 20, 2015 Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of September 16, 2015 Public Works Director Award of Contrract – Street Paving Public Works Director PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:30 PM Speed Signs Survey Public Works Director MUNICIPAL MATTERS Downtown Cost/Benefit Finance Analysis Finance Director Initial discussion of reviewing the Municipal Code to clarify the definition of short-term rentals and enhance the City’s ability to enforce violations (Tucker, Barragan) Community Development Director Review of current practices and the Municipal code to enhance the City’s ability to enforce permits related to using of city property (beach, parks, and other facilities) for training classes (Tucker, Fangary, Barragan) Acting Recreation Manager Policy on procedure for voting on Boards/Commissions Applicants City Clerk MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER Polystyrene Use Update Community Development Director / Environmental Analyst Quarterly Update - Strategic Plan Action Agenda Management Analyst 3 PENDING ITEMS Consideration of reduction of business license fee request from Carol G. Weiss, Ph.D.Finance Director Ethics Policy City Manager & Finance Director Food Trucks – Policy Discussion Community Development Director PCH/Aviation Project Update (Including Aesthetic Signage)Public Works Director Hope Chapel Development City Manager/Economic Dev Officer Business Improvement District (BID) for Pier Plaza – Assist in BID Proposal Economic Development Officer Additional Bike Paths Discussion Public Works Director Award Construction Contract for CIP 13-655 City Facilities ADA Improvements Public Works Director Cooperative Agreement with CalTrans (Continued from meeting of April 14, 2015)Public Works Director Community Risk Analysis Fire Chief 11th Street Hotel Community Development Director Council Chambers: City Logo and Name on Council Chambers Wall Dais Layout AV Podium for presentations City Manager / Public Works Director Update Personnel Policies Human Resources Manager Long-term Reduced/Free Daytime Parking Program & Possible Chamber Marketing Plan - Council Discussion/Direction (Only after Council direction regarding Phase 2 purchases) Management Analyst 2015/16 Economic Development Plan Update Economic Development Officer NOVEMBER 2015 Canvass of Votes and Installation of Officers – November 24, 2015 City Clerk Oversized Vehicle Ordinance Community Services Manager Homeless Update Police Chief/Management Analyst National Citizen Survey Overview Human Resources Manager Quarterly Update – Closed Session Litigation Human Resources Manager Land Management System: Update Community Development Director Communication Update Public Information Officer Smoking Ordinance Update Community Development Director Introduction of Hermosa Beach Social Host Ordinance Police Chief Updating the City Street Signs as presented by Graphic Solutions to give Hermosa Beach a new updated look and discussion of entry signs on Herondo (Tucker, Petty, Fangary) Public Works Director DECEMBER 8, 2015 Phase 3 Recommendation for Purchase - Council Discussion/Direction (Upgrades of remaining citywide coin meters) Management Analyst Update on Farmers Market Acting Recreation Manager Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0689 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: To receive and file the Planning Commission tentative future agenda items. Attachment: Planning Commission Tentative October 20, 2015 Agenda Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Tentative Future Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION City of Hermosa Beach OCTOBER 20, 2015 7:00 P.M. Project Title Public Notice Meeting Date Date Rec’d Remarks 2515 Valley Dr., Kiwanis Club – Conditional Use Permit for AT&T cell site (continued from the 7/21/15 meeting) 10/8 10/20 1200 Artesia Blvd., Verizon Wireless —Conditional Use Permit to construct an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility consisting of (12) panel antennas, (12) Remote Radio Units and associated equipment (continued from 8/18/15 meeting) 10/8 10/20 2515 PCH, Hotel Hermosa— Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan to remodel an existing hotel. 10/8 10/20 2464 Hermosa Avenue—Slope Determination 10/20 Direction re. Text Amendment to implement the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy. 10/20 1429 Hermosa Avenue – Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan for a 30 room hotel and Conditional Use Permit for on-sale general alcohol in guest rooms. 10/8 10/20 f:b95\cd\Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda 9/16/15 Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0687 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS FOR JULY 2015 (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommended Action: To receive and file the July 2015 Financial Reports. Summary: Attached are the July Revenue and Expenditure reports.The reports provide detail by revenue account and by department for expenditures, with summaries by fund at the back of each report. General Fund revenue is 3.28%received for 8.33%of the fiscal year.The General Fund revenue, particularly tax revenue,is not received incrementally.Adjusting for tax revenue,the total would be 8.98% General Fund expenditures are 6.8%expended for 8.33%of the fiscal year.Expenditures do not necessarily occur on an incremental basis. Attachments: 1.Revenue Report 2.Expenditure Report Respectfully Submitted by: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 11,339,888.00 0.00 0.00 11,339,888.00 0.00 3102 Current Year Unsecured 426,858.00 0.00 0.00 426,858.00 0.00 3103 Prior Year Collections 120,000.00 -12,331.89 -12,331.89 132,331.89 -10.28 3104 In-lieu Sales Tax 716,424.00 0.00 0.00 716,424.00 0.00 3106 Supplemental Roll SB813 200,000.00 31,659.43 31,659.43 168,340.57 15.83 3107 Transfer Tax 237,307.00 0.00 0.00 237,307.00 0.00 3108 Sales Tax 2,149,273.00 58,919.32 58,919.32 2,090,353.68 2.74 3109 1/2 Cent Sales Tx Ext 182,608.00 0.00 0.00 182,608.00 0.00 3110 Time Warner Cable TV Franchise 137,293.00 0.00 0.00 137,293.00 0.00 3111 Electric Franchise 81,844.00 0.00 0.00 81,844.00 0.00 3112 Gas Franchise 50,688.00 0.00 0.00 50,688.00 0.00 3113 Refuse Franchise 224,424.00 0.00 0.00 224,424.00 0.00 3114 Transient Occupancy Tax 2,295,470.00 0.00 0.00 2,295,470.00 0.00 3115 Business License 1,050,834.00 42,295.30 42,295.30 1,008,538.70 4.02 3120 Utility User Tax 2,455,484.00 0.00 0.00 2,455,484.00 0.00 3122 Property tax In-lieu of Veh Lic Fees 2,157,858.00 0.00 0.00 2,157,858.00 0.00 3123 Verizon Cable Franchise Fee 312,062.00 0.00 0.00 312,062.00 0.00 Total Taxes 0.50 24,138,315.00 120,542.16 120,542.16 24,017,772.84 3200 Licenses And Permits 3202 Dog Licenses 14,000.00 131.00 131.00 13,869.00 0.94 3204 Building Permits 390,000.00 30,280.03 30,280.03 359,719.97 7.76 1Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3205 Electric Permits 75,820.00 7,157.10 7,157.10 68,662.90 9.44 3206 Plumbing Permits 63,000.00 11,322.00 11,322.00 51,678.00 17.97 3207 Occupancy Permits 16,000.00 1,716.00 1,716.00 14,284.00 10.73 3208 Grease Trap Permits 8,526.00 783.00 783.00 7,743.00 9.18 3209 Garage Sales 300.00 28.00 28.00 272.00 9.33 3211 Banner Permits 5,968.00 848.00 848.00 5,120.00 14.21 3213 Animal Redemption Fee 1,000.00 48.00 48.00 952.00 4.80 3214 Amplified Sound Permit 5,686.00 1,673.00 1,673.00 4,013.00 29.42 3215 Temporary Sign Permit 1,392.00 174.00 174.00 1,218.00 12.50 3217 Open Fire Permit 700.00 60.00 60.00 640.00 8.57 3218 Auto Repair Permit 3,400.00 0.00 0.00 3,400.00 0.00 3219 Newsrack Permits 1,320.00 0.00 0.00 1,320.00 0.00 3225 Taxicab Franchise Fees 176,000.00 0.00 0.00 176,000.00 0.00 3226 Admin Permit - Limited Outdoor Seating 262.00 0.00 0.00 262.00 0.00 3227 Mechanical Permits 31,571.00 2,241.30 2,241.30 29,329.70 7.10 3228 Concealed Weapons Permit 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 Total Licenses And Permits 7.10 795,045.00 56,461.43 56,461.43 738,583.57 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3301 Municipal Court Fines 226,407.00 5,187.00 5,187.00 221,220.00 2.29 3302 Court Fines /Parking 2,545,289.00 197,661.22 197,661.22 2,347,627.78 7.77 3305 Administrative Fines 5,500.00 300.00 300.00 5,200.00 5.45 Total Fines & Forfeitures 7.31 2,777,196.00 203,148.22 203,148.22 2,574,047.78 2Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 160,057.00 667.27 667.27 159,389.73 0.42 3402 Rents & Concessions 1,400.00 0.00 0.00 1,400.00 0.00 3404 Community Center Leases 41,000.00 3,441.60 3,441.60 37,558.40 8.39 3405 Community Center Rentals 200,000.00 18,493.50 18,493.50 181,506.50 9.25 3406 Community Center Theatre 65,000.00 2,082.50 2,082.50 62,917.50 3.20 3418 Special Events 120,000.00 10,606.00 10,606.00 109,394.00 8.84 3422 Beach/Plaza Promotions 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 3425 Ground Lease 35,816.00 2,984.70 2,984.70 32,831.30 8.33 3427 Cell Site License- Sprint 35,204.00 2,897.48 2,897.48 32,306.52 8.23 3428 Cell Site License - Verizon 29,961.00 2,472.00 2,472.00 27,489.00 8.25 3429 Inmate Phone Services 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 3431 Storage Facility Operating Lease 180,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 165,000.00 8.33 3432 Film Permits 0.00 7,360.00 7,360.00 -7,360.00 0.00 3450 Investment Discount 1,911.00 171.29 171.29 1,739.71 8.96 Total Use Of Money & Property 7.33 902,349.00 66,176.34 66,176.34 836,172.66 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3507 Highway Maintenance 3,100.00 0.00 0.00 3,100.00 0.00 3508 Mandated Costs 31,320.00 0.00 0.00 31,320.00 0.00 3509 Homeowner Property Tax Relief 78,605.00 0.00 0.00 78,605.00 0.00 3510 POST 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00 3511 STC-Service Officer Training 7,162.00 0.00 0.00 7,162.00 0.00 3Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3575 VLF Coll Excess of $14m-Rev code 11001.5 8,094.00 0.00 0.00 8,094.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/State 0.00 143,281.00 0.00 0.00 143,281.00 3800 Current Service Charges 3801 Residential Inspection 33,534.00 3,312.00 3,312.00 30,222.00 9.88 3802 Planning Sign Permit/Master Sign Program 11,958.00 1,058.00 1,058.00 10,900.00 8.85 3803 Negative Declaration 10,155.00 0.00 0.00 10,155.00 0.00 3804 General Plan Maintenance Fees 63,000.00 3,696.00 3,696.00 59,304.00 5.87 3805 Amendment to Planning Entitlement 17,429.00 3,873.00 3,873.00 13,556.00 22.22 3807 Refuse Lien Fees/Consolidated 336.00 0.00 0.00 336.00 0.00 3808 Zone Variance Review 3,986.00 0.00 0.00 3,986.00 0.00 3809 Tentative Map Review 29,881.00 2,298.50 2,298.50 27,582.50 7.69 3810 Final Map Review 8,688.00 724.00 724.00 7,964.00 8.33 3811 Zone Change 3,806.00 0.00 0.00 3,806.00 0.00 3812 Conditional Use Permit - Comm/Other 16,058.00 4,941.00 4,941.00 11,117.00 30.77 3813 Plan Check Fees 466,000.00 51,070.06 51,070.06 414,929.94 10.96 3815 Public Works Services 60,000.00 3,711.00 3,711.00 56,289.00 6.19 3816 Utility Trench Service Connect Permit 58,000.00 3,367.00 3,367.00 54,633.00 5.81 3817 Address Change Request Fee 2,220.00 0.00 0.00 2,220.00 0.00 3818 Police Services 1,500.00 261.00 261.00 1,239.00 17.40 3819 Jail Services 6,500.00 244.00 244.00 6,256.00 3.75 3821 Daily Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 60,459.00 5,022.00 5,022.00 55,437.00 8.31 3823 Special Event Security/Police 36,000.00 0.00 0.00 36,000.00 0.00 3824 500' Noticing 13,296.00 3,324.00 3,324.00 9,972.00 25.00 4Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3825 Public Notice Posting 2,592.00 756.00 756.00 1,836.00 29.17 3827 Library Grounds Maintenance 16,005.00 0.00 0.00 16,005.00 0.00 3831 Non-Utility Street Excavation Permit 30,000.00 1,932.00 1,932.00 28,068.00 6.44 3834 Encroachment Permit 260,000.00 28,612.30 28,612.30 231,387.70 11.00 3836 Refund Transaction Fee 160.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 3837 Returned Check Charge 1,000.00 55.00 55.00 945.00 5.50 3839 Photocopy Charges 650.00 187.90 187.90 462.10 28.91 3840 Ambulance Transport 469,000.00 53,104.00 53,104.00 415,896.00 11.32 3841 Police Towing 98,000.00 0.00 0.00 98,000.00 0.00 3842 Parking Meters 1,895,344.00 232,381.33 232,381.33 1,662,962.67 12.26 3843 Parking Permits-Annual 430,000.00 8,981.00 8,981.00 421,019.00 2.09 3844 Daily Parking Permits 1,500.00 588.00 588.00 912.00 39.20 3845 Lot A Revenue 573,735.00 55,690.25 55,690.25 518,044.75 9.71 3846 No Pier Pkg Structure Revenue 668,975.00 86,448.00 86,448.00 582,527.00 12.92 3848 Driveway Permits 2,500.00 332.00 332.00 2,168.00 13.28 3849 Guest Permits 2,600.00 401.00 401.00 2,199.00 15.42 3850 Contractors Permits 28,000.00 4,862.00 4,862.00 23,138.00 17.36 3851 Cash Key Revenue 0.00 44.00 44.00 -44.00 0.00 3852 Recreation Program Transaction Fee 40,000.00 5,055.00 5,055.00 34,945.00 12.64 3856 500' - 2nd Noticing 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 3857 Parking Plan Application 21,136.00 10,568.00 10,568.00 10,568.00 50.00 3858 Monthly Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 135,408.00 7,378.00 7,378.00 128,030.00 5.45 3860 Car2Go Parking Fee 37,080.00 0.00 0.00 37,080.00 0.00 3861 Fire Alarm Sys Insp - New Installation 600.00 0.00 0.00 600.00 0.00 5Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3862 Alarm Permit Fee 3,600.00 191.00 191.00 3,409.00 5.31 3863 False Alarm Fee 250.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 0.00 3865 Lot B Revenue 101,800.00 6,927.35 6,927.35 94,872.65 6.80 3867 Precise Development Plans 21,736.00 0.00 0.00 21,736.00 0.00 3868 Public Noticing/300 Ft Radius 9,728.00 608.00 608.00 9,120.00 6.25 3871 Passport Processing Fee 15,000.00 1,350.00 1,350.00 13,650.00 9.00 3872 Passport Photo Fee 2,040.00 190.00 190.00 1,850.00 9.31 3876 Spec Fire Protectn Sys Insp-New Install 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 3878 Fire Re-Inspections 500.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 3882 Special Event Fire Code Permit 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 3884 Lot Line Adjustment 385.00 385.00 385.00 0.00 100.00 3886 Text Amendment/Private 4,755.00 0.00 0.00 4,755.00 0.00 3888 Slope/Grade Height Determination 10,517.00 6,642.00 6,642.00 3,875.00 63.15 3890 300 Ft Radius Noticing/Appeal to CC 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 3891 Appeal of Plng Comm Action to Council 1,854.00 0.00 0.00 1,854.00 0.00 3893 Contract Recreation Classes 350,000.00 52,639.00 52,639.00 297,361.00 15.04 3894 Other Recreation Programs 170,000.00 17,725.00 17,725.00 152,275.00 10.43 3895 Zoning Information Letters 1,064.00 0.00 0.00 1,064.00 0.00 3896 Mailing Fee 13.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.00 3897 Admin Fee/TULIP Ins Certificate 3,500.00 364.08 364.08 3,135.92 10.40 3899 Condo - CUP/PDP 81,510.00 5,434.00 5,434.00 76,076.00 6.67 Total Current Service Charges 10.57 6,401,968.00 676,732.77 676,732.77 5,725,235.23 3900 Other Revenue 6Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 3903 Contributions Non Govt 0.00 8,914.00 8,914.00 -8,914.00 0.00 3904 General Miscellaneous 0.00 6,089.42 6,089.42 -6,089.42 0.00 3907 Pkg Str Utility Reimb From Beach House 2,600.00 0.00 0.00 2,600.00 0.00 3908 Hermosa Sr Ctr Donations/Memberships 6,000.00 884.25 884.25 5,115.75 14.74 3914 Planning EIR Admin Reimbursement 114,600.00 0.00 0.00 114,600.00 0.00 3938 Solid Waste Contract Admin Fee 50,910.00 0.00 0.00 50,910.00 0.00 3955 Operating Transfers In 362,884.00 30,240.00 30,240.00 332,644.00 8.33 3960 Verizon PEG Grant 17,925.00 0.00 0.00 17,925.00 0.00 3961 Chamber Funding Econ Dev 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 3963 HB Youth Enrichment Program Fee 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 Total Other Revenue 7.58 608,919.00 46,127.67 46,127.67 562,791.33 6800 Current Service Charges Continued 6801 Mural Review 1,263.00 0.00 0.00 1,263.00 0.00 6803 General Plan Amendment/ Map or Text 3,279.00 0.00 0.00 3,279.00 0.00 6807 Planning Commission Interpretation 1,176.00 0.00 0.00 1,176.00 0.00 6809 Categorical Exemption 2,460.00 492.00 492.00 1,968.00 20.00 6810 Deed Restriction/Covenant Review 6,945.00 463.00 463.00 6,482.00 6.67 6811 Landscape Plan Review 9,240.00 308.00 308.00 8,932.00 3.33 6813 Preliminary Plan Review 276.00 0.00 0.00 276.00 0.00 6825 Clean Bay Restaurant - NPDES Inspection 8,000.00 174.00 174.00 7,826.00 2.18 6826 Light Industry - NPDES Inspection 3,500.00 0.00 0.00 3,500.00 0.00 6828 Public Improvement Plan Check 20,000.00 2,155.00 2,155.00 17,845.00 10.78 7Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 6834 Citation Sign-off 1,470.00 105.00 105.00 1,365.00 7.14 6835 Taxicab Inspection 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 6836 Police Business Background Check 221.00 0.00 0.00 221.00 0.00 6837 Deceased Animal Pickup 200.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 6839 Pet Home Quarantine Review 51.00 0.00 0.00 51.00 0.00 6840 Multiple Dog Review 717.00 0.00 0.00 717.00 0.00 6841 Fire Sprinkler System Insp - New Install 20,000.00 3,025.00 3,025.00 16,975.00 15.13 6847 Document Certification 9.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 6849 Traffic Plan Review 450.00 0.00 0.00 450.00 0.00 6850 Annual Business Fire Inspection 40,000.00 114.00 114.00 39,886.00 0.29 6851 Busines Licenses State Mandated Fee 2,200.00 241.00 241.00 1,959.00 10.95 6860 Refuse Lien Fees/Athens 294.00 0.00 0.00 294.00 0.00 Total Current Service Charges Continued 5.80 121,976.00 7,077.00 7,077.00 114,899.00 34,712,783.41 1,176,265.59 1,176,265.59 35,889,049.00 3.28Total General Fund 8Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund105 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 454,000.00 0.00 0.00 454,000.00 0.00 3103 Prior Year Collections 7,000.00 0.00 0.00 7,000.00 0.00 3105 Assessment Rebates -2,000.00 0.00 0.00 -2,000.00 0.00 Total Taxes 0.00 459,000.00 0.00 0.00 459,000.00 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 640.00 1.33 1.33 638.67 0.21 3450 Investment Discount 8.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.21 648.00 1.33 1.33 646.67 3900 Other Revenue 3955 Operating Transfers In 26,950.00 2,246.00 2,246.00 24,704.00 8.33 Total Other Revenue 8.33 26,950.00 2,246.00 2,246.00 24,704.00 484,350.67 2,247.33 2,247.33 486,598.00 0.46Total Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 9Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 State Gas Tax Fund115 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3,728.00 15.30 15.30 3,712.70 0.41 3450 Investment Discount 44.00 3.93 3.93 40.07 8.93 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.51 3,772.00 19.23 19.23 3,752.77 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3501 Section 2106 Allocation 62,968.00 0.00 0.00 62,968.00 0.00 3502 Section 2107 Allocation 155,052.00 0.00 0.00 155,052.00 0.00 3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 3512 Section 2105 (Prop 111) 112,836.00 0.00 0.00 112,836.00 0.00 3513 Sec 2103 Higher Mtr Veh Excise Tax(HUTA) 97,980.00 0.00 0.00 97,980.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/State 0.00 432,836.00 0.00 0.00 432,836.00 436,588.77 19.23 19.23 436,608.00 0.00Total State Gas Tax Fund 10Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 AB939 Fund117 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.47 0.47 -0.47 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.47 -0.47 3800 Current Service Charges 3860 AB939 Surcharge 57,193.00 0.00 0.00 57,193.00 0.00 Total Current Service Charges 0.00 57,193.00 0.00 0.00 57,193.00 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6800 Current Service Charges Continued Total Current Service Charges Continued 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57,192.53 0.47 0.47 57,193.00 0.00Total AB939 Fund 11Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Prop A Open Space Fund121 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3600 Intergovernmental/County 3608 Maintenance Allocation 20,557.00 0.00 0.00 20,557.00 0.00 3631 South Park Phase I Improvements Grant 112,500.00 0.00 0.00 112,500.00 0.00 133,057.00 0.00 0.00 133,057.00 0.00Total Prop A Open Space Fund 12Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 13 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Tyco Fund122 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 8,240.00 33.94 33.94 8,206.06 0.41 3426 Easement Agreement 318,845.00 79,711.28 79,711.28 239,133.72 25.00 3450 Investment Discount 97.00 8.71 8.71 88.29 8.98 247,428.07 79,753.93 79,753.93 327,182.00 24.38Total Tyco Fund 13Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 14 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Tyco Tidelands123 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 39.00 0.13 0.13 38.87 0.33 3450 Investment Discount 1.00 0.03 0.03 0.97 3.00 39.84 0.16 0.16 40.00 0.40Total Tyco Tidelands 14Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 15 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3116 Parks & Recreation Facility Tax 7,145.00 0.00 0.00 7,145.00 0.00 Total Taxes 0.00 7,145.00 0.00 0.00 7,145.00 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 6,686.00 23.92 23.92 6,662.08 0.36 3450 Investment Discount 79.00 6.16 6.16 72.84 7.80 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.44 6,765.00 30.08 30.08 6,734.92 3900 Other Revenue 3910 Park/Recreation In Lieu Fee 216,451.00 6,951.00 6,951.00 209,500.00 3.21 Total Other Revenue 3.21 216,451.00 6,951.00 6,951.00 209,500.00 223,379.92 6,981.08 6,981.08 230,361.00 3.03Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 15Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 16 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund135 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 37.00 0.02 0.02 36.98 0.05 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.05 37.00 0.02 0.02 36.98 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Spec Assessment Admin Fees 4,350.00 0.00 0.00 4,350.00 0.00 Total Other Revenue 0.00 4,350.00 0.00 0.00 4,350.00 4,386.98 0.02 0.02 4,387.00 0.00Total Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund 16Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 17 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund136 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 2,600.00 0.00 0.00 2,600.00 0.00 2,600.00 0.00 0.00 2,600.00 0.00Total Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund 17Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 18 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund137 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 222.00 0.59 0.59 221.41 0.27 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.27 222.00 0.59 0.59 221.41 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 Total Other Revenue 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 9,000.00 9,221.41 0.59 0.59 9,222.00 0.01Total Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund 18Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 19 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund138 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 306.00 0.90 0.90 305.10 0.29 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.29 306.00 0.90 0.90 305.10 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 Total Other Revenue 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 10,305.10 0.90 0.90 10,306.00 0.01Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 19Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 20 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund139 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 46.00 0.10 0.10 45.90 0.22 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.22 46.00 0.10 0.10 45.90 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 Total Other Revenue 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 3,045.90 0.10 0.10 3,046.00 0.00Total Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 20Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 21 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Community Dev Block Grant140 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal 3715 CDBG Administration 6,600.00 0.00 0.00 6,600.00 0.00 3720 Americans with Disabilities Act 168,000.00 0.00 0.00 168,000.00 0.00 174,600.00 0.00 0.00 174,600.00 0.00Total Community Dev Block Grant 21Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 22 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Proposition A Fund145 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3117 Proposition A Transit 357,901.00 24,124.79 24,124.79 333,776.21 6.74 Total Taxes 6.74 357,901.00 24,124.79 24,124.79 333,776.21 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 8,235.00 39.16 39.16 8,195.84 0.48 3450 Investment Discount 97.00 10.05 10.05 86.95 10.36 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.59 8,332.00 49.21 49.21 8,282.79 3800 Current Service Charges 3853 Dial-A-Taxi Program 5,900.00 470.00 470.00 5,430.00 7.97 3855 Bus Passes 1,000.00 74.90 74.90 925.10 7.49 Total Current Service Charges 7.90 6,900.00 544.90 544.90 6,355.10 348,414.10 24,718.90 24,718.90 373,133.00 6.62Total Proposition A Fund 22Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 23 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Proposition C Fund146 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3118 Proposition C Local Return 296,870.00 20,010.80 20,010.80 276,859.20 6.74 Total Taxes 6.74 296,870.00 20,010.80 20,010.80 276,859.20 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 11,967.00 38.95 38.95 11,928.05 0.33 3450 Investment Discount 141.00 10.00 10.00 131.00 7.09 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.40 12,108.00 48.95 48.95 12,059.05 288,918.25 20,059.75 20,059.75 308,978.00 6.49Total Proposition C Fund 23Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 24 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Measure R Fund147 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3119 Measure R Local Return Funds 221,869.00 14,985.73 14,985.73 206,883.27 6.75 Total Taxes 6.75 221,869.00 14,985.73 14,985.73 206,883.27 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 5,580.00 38.41 38.41 5,541.59 0.69 3450 Investment Discount 66.00 9.86 9.86 56.14 14.94 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.85 5,646.00 48.27 48.27 5,597.73 212,481.00 15,034.00 15,034.00 227,515.00 6.61Total Measure R Fund 24Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 25 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Grants Fund150 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3558 Beverage Recycling Grant 15,870.00 0.00 0.00 15,870.00 0.00 3566 Coastal Conservancy Grant 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 3571 Local Coastal Assistance Grant 36,834.00 0.00 0.00 36,834.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/State 0.00 102,704.00 0.00 0.00 102,704.00 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal 3736 Bulletproof Vest Partnership 3,125.00 0.00 0.00 3,125.00 0.00 3748 Gen Plan/Coastal/Strat Growth Council 82,234.00 0.00 0.00 82,234.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/Federal 0.00 85,359.00 0.00 0.00 85,359.00 3900 Other Revenue 3970 Melchione Trust- Surf Memorial 275,000.00 0.00 0.00 275,000.00 0.00 Total Other Revenue 0.00 275,000.00 0.00 0.00 275,000.00 463,063.00 0.00 0.00 463,063.00 0.00Total Grants Fund 25Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 26 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund152 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 192.00 1.47 1.47 190.53 0.77 3450 Investment Discount 2.00 0.38 0.38 1.62 19.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.95 194.00 1.85 1.85 192.15 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3538 AQMD Emission Control AB2766 24,268.00 0.00 0.00 24,268.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/State 0.00 24,268.00 0.00 0.00 24,268.00 24,460.15 1.85 1.85 24,462.00 0.01Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 26Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 27 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)153 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3135 C.O.P.S. Allocation 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 Total Taxes 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 2,860.00 0.00 0.00 2,860.00 0.00 3450 Investment Discount 34.00 0.00 0.00 34.00 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.00 2,894.00 0.00 0.00 2,894.00 102,894.00 0.00 0.00 102,894.00 0.00Total Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF) 27Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 28 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Sewer Fund160 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 14,400.00 0.00 0.00 14,400.00 0.00 3450 Investment Discount 170.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.00 14,570.00 0.00 0.00 14,570.00 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3550 CA Waste Oil Recycling Grant 5,800.00 0.00 0.00 5,800.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/State 0.00 5,800.00 0.00 0.00 5,800.00 3600 Intergovernmental/County 3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/County 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 3800 Current Service Charges 3828 Sewer Connection Fee 21,000.00 0.00 0.00 21,000.00 0.00 3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 3,000.00 490.00 490.00 2,510.00 16.33 3832 Sewer Lateral Installation 10,000.00 328.00 328.00 9,672.00 3.28 Total Current Service Charges 2.41 34,000.00 818.00 818.00 33,182.00 3900 Other Revenue 3922 Other Financing Source- Debt Issuance 4,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,000,000.00 0.00 3955 Operating Transfers In 276,191.00 23,016.00 23,016.00 253,175.00 8.33 Total Other Revenue 0.54 4,276,191.00 23,016.00 23,016.00 4,253,175.00 4,316,727.00 23,834.00 23,834.00 4,340,561.00 0.55Total Sewer Fund 28Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 29 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Storm Drains Fund161 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3900 Other Revenue 3955 Operating Transfers In 423,809.00 35,317.00 35,317.00 388,492.00 8.33 388,492.00 35,317.00 35,317.00 423,809.00 8.33Total Storm Drains Fund 29Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 30 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3307 Department of Justice Forfeited Funds 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 Total Fines & Forfeitures 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 4,721.00 3.29 3.29 4,717.71 0.07 3450 Investment Discount 56.00 0.84 0.84 55.16 1.50 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.09 4,777.00 4.13 4.13 4,772.87 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,772.87 4.13 4.13 24,777.00 0.02Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 30Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 31 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Fire Protection Fund180 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 466.00 2.92 2.92 463.08 0.63 3450 Investment Discount 5.00 0.75 0.75 4.25 15.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.78 471.00 3.67 3.67 467.33 3900 Other Revenue 3912 Fire Flow Fee 10,500.00 153.08 153.08 10,346.92 1.46 Total Other Revenue 1.46 10,500.00 153.08 153.08 10,346.92 10,814.25 156.75 156.75 10,971.00 1.43Total Fire Protection Fund 31Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 32 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Capital Improvement Fund301 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 10,931.00 0.00 0.00 10,931.00 0.00 3450 Investment Discount 129.00 18.09 18.09 110.91 14.02 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.16 11,060.00 18.09 18.09 11,041.91 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,041.91 18.09 18.09 11,060.00 0.16Total Capital Improvement Fund 32Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 33 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Artesia Blvd Relinquishment302 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.28 0.28 -0.28 0.00 -0.28 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.00Total Artesia Blvd Relinquishment 33Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 34 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2609 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1,735.00 7.07 7.07 1,727.93 0.41 1,727.93 7.07 7.07 1,735.00 0.41Total Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2 34Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 35 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund610 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 441.00 2.35 2.35 438.65 0.53 438.65 2.35 2.35 441.00 0.53Total Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund 35Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 36 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund611 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 3.70 3.70 -3.70 0.00 -3.70 3.70 3.70 0.00 0.00Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund 36Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 37 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund612 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 63.00 0.21 0.21 62.79 0.33 62.79 0.21 0.21 63.00 0.33Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund 37Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 38 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund617 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1,265.00 6.58 6.58 1,258.42 0.52 1,258.42 6.58 6.58 1,265.00 0.52Total Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund 38Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 39 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Loma Drive Assessment Fund618 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1,552.00 7.63 7.63 1,544.37 0.49 1,544.37 7.63 7.63 1,552.00 0.49Total Loma Drive Assessment Fund 39Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 40 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2619 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 206.00 0.68 0.68 205.32 0.33 205.32 0.68 0.68 206.00 0.33Total Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2 40Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 41 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Insurance Fund705 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3800 Current Service Charges 3880 Insurance Service Charges 2,927,445.00 243,954.00 243,954.00 2,683,491.00 8.33 Total Current Service Charges 8.33 2,927,445.00 243,954.00 243,954.00 2,683,491.00 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0.00 75,503.14 75,503.14 -75,503.14 0.00 Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 75,503.14 75,503.14 -75,503.14 2,607,987.86 319,457.14 319,457.14 2,927,445.00 10.91Total Insurance Fund 41Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 42 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3800 Current Service Charges 3822 Building Maintenance Service Charges 101,555.00 8,458.00 8,458.00 93,097.00 8.33 3885 Comm Equip/Business Mach Charges 612,222.00 51,019.00 51,019.00 561,203.00 8.33 3889 Vehicle/Equip Replacement Charges 858,415.00 71,535.00 71,535.00 786,880.00 8.33 Total Current Service Charges 8.33 1,572,192.00 131,012.00 131,012.00 1,441,180.00 3900 Other Revenue 3962 SCE Reimbursement 426,077.00 0.00 0.00 426,077.00 0.00 Total Other Revenue 0.00 426,077.00 0.00 0.00 426,077.00 1,867,257.00 131,012.00 131,012.00 1,998,269.00 6.56Total Equipment Replacement Fund 42Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 43 8:38AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Investment Fund900 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Total Investment Fund Grand Total 49,006,448.00 1,834,911.51 1,834,911.51 47,171,536.49 3.74 43Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 City Council1101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1101-4100 Personal Services 36,538.00 2,853.50 2,853.50 7.811101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 33,684.50 300.00 148.16 148.16 49.391101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 151.84 5,884.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 5,884.00 31,800.00 2,650.00 2,650.00 8.331101-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 29,150.00 12,170.00 354.14 354.14 2.911101-4180 Retirement 0.00 11,815.86 41.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 41.00 29,760.00 2,392.43 2,392.43 8.041101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 27,367.57 991.00 81.92 81.92 8.271101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 909.08 2,398.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 2,398.00 Total Personal Services 119,882.00 8,480.15 8,480.15 0.00 111,401.85 7.07 1101-4200 Contract Services 80,849.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 80,849.00 Total Contract Services 80,849.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,849.00 0.00 1101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 650.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-4304 Telephone 0.00 650.00 14,000.00 549.02 549.02 3.921101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 13,450.98 22,330.00 12,785.75 12,785.75 57.261101-4315 Membership 0.00 9,544.25 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 25,000.00 34,670.00 2,488.33 2,488.33 7.181101-4319 Special Events 0.00 32,181.67 3,620.00 302.00 302.00 8.341101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 3,318.00 4,356.00 363.00 363.00 8.331101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 3,993.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 104,626.00 16,488.10 16,488.10 0.00 88,137.90 15.76 1101-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1101-5600 Buildings/Improvements 1Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 City Council1101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total City Council 305,357.00 24,968.25 24,968.25 0.00 280,388.75 8.18 2Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 City Clerk1121 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1121-4100 Personal Services 120,424.00 9,758.70 9,758.70 8.101121-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 110,665.30 13,377.00 0.00 0.00 0.001121-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 13,377.00 49,836.00 6,595.89 6,595.89 13.241121-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 43,240.11 32,209.00 1,008.46 1,008.46 3.131121-4180 Retirement 0.00 31,200.54 40,174.00 3,224.99 3,224.99 8.031121-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 36,949.01 2,471.00 237.24 237.24 9.601121-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 2,233.76 8,583.00 0.00 0.00 0.001121-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 8,583.00 Total Personal Services 267,074.00 20,825.28 20,825.28 0.00 246,248.72 7.80 1121-4200 Contract Services 23,700.00 159.00 159.00 0.671121-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 23,541.00 52,000.00 961.47 961.47 1.851121-4251 Contract Services/Govt 0.00 51,038.53 Total Contract Services 75,700.00 1,120.47 1,120.47 0.00 74,579.53 1.48 1121-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 900.00 5.34 5.34 0.591121-4304 Telephone 0.00 894.66 4,750.00 776.62 776.62 16.351121-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 3,973.38 650.00 99.00 99.00 15.231121-4315 Membership 0.00 551.00 3,850.00 0.00 0.00 0.001121-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 3,850.00 13,450.00 310.36 310.36 2.311121-4323 Public Noticing 0.00 13,139.64 5,842.00 487.00 487.00 8.341121-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 5,355.00 612.00 51.00 51.00 8.331121-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 561.00 10,311.00 859.00 859.00 8.331121-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 9,452.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 40,365.00 2,588.32 2,588.32 0.00 37,776.68 6.41 1121-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total City Clerk 383,139.00 24,534.07 24,534.07 0.00 358,604.93 6.40 3Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 City Attorney1131 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1131-4200 Contract Services 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001131-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 250,000.00 Total City Attorney 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250,000.00 0.00 4Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 City Prosecutor1132 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1132-4200 Contract Services 208,004.00 0.00 0.00 0.001132-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 208,004.00 Total Contract Services 208,004.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 208,004.00 0.00 1132-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 300.00 2.83 2.83 0.941132-4304 Telephone 0.00 297.17 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.001132-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 200.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 500.00 2.83 2.83 0.00 497.17 0.57 Total City Prosecutor 208,504.00 2.83 2.83 0.00 208,501.17 0.00 5Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 City Treasurer1141 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1141-4100 Personal Services 1,128.00 0.00 0.00 0.001141-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 1,128.00 6,360.00 530.00 530.00 8.331141-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 5,830.00 397.00 33.06 33.06 8.331141-4180 Retirement 0.00 363.94 10,892.00 874.62 874.62 8.031141-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 10,017.38 92.00 7.68 7.68 8.351141-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 84.32 229.00 0.00 0.00 0.001141-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 229.00 Total Personal Services 19,098.00 1,445.36 1,445.36 0.00 17,652.64 7.57 1141-4200 Contract Services 11,650.00 0.00 0.00 0.001141-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 11,650.00 Total Contract Services 11,650.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,650.00 0.00 1141-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 900.00 1.36 1.36 0.151141-4304 Telephone 0.00 898.64 2,400.00 128.56 128.56 5.361141-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 2,271.44 105.00 65.00 65.00 61.901141-4315 Membership 0.00 40.00 2,405.00 0.00 0.00 0.001141-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 2,405.00 2,962.00 247.00 247.00 8.341141-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 2,715.00 609.00 51.00 51.00 8.371141-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 558.00 489.00 41.00 41.00 8.381141-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 448.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 9,870.00 533.92 533.92 0.00 9,336.08 5.41 1141-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total City Treasurer 40,618.00 1,979.28 1,979.28 0.00 38,638.72 4.87 6Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 City Manager1201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1201-4100 Personal Services 460,588.00 27,974.70 27,974.70 6.071201-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 432,613.30 3,000.00 118.52 118.52 3.951201-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 2,881.48 28,342.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 28,342.00 0.00 4,315.60 4,315.60 0.001201-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 -4,315.60 40,367.00 2,203.59 2,203.59 5.461201-4180 Retirement 0.00 38,163.41 62,310.00 3,445.67 3,445.67 5.531201-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 58,864.33 7,288.00 498.89 498.89 6.851201-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 6,789.11 12,361.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 12,361.00 Total Personal Services 614,256.00 38,556.97 38,556.97 0.00 575,699.03 6.28 1201-4200 Contract Services 88,760.00 8,140.21 8,140.21 9.171201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 80,619.79 Total Contract Services 88,760.00 8,140.21 8,140.21 0.00 80,619.79 9.17 1201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3,000.00 -70.89 -70.89 2.361201-4304 Telephone 0.00 3,070.89 4,000.00 40.47 40.47 1.011201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 3,959.53 2,975.00 470.00 470.00 15.801201-4315 Membership 0.00 2,505.00 13,265.00 2,341.72 2,341.72 17.651201-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 10,923.28 9,060.00 755.00 755.00 8.331201-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 8,305.00 3,406.00 284.00 284.00 8.341201-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 3,122.00 22,993.00 1,916.00 1,916.00 8.331201-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 21,077.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 58,699.00 5,736.30 5,736.30 0.00 52,962.70 9.77 1201-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1201-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Total City Manager 761,715.00 52,433.48 52,433.48 0.00 709,281.52 6.88 Finance Administration1202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1202-4100 Personal Services 451,976.00 35,548.99 35,548.99 7.871202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 416,427.01 565.00 0.00 0.00 0.001202-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 565.00 38,572.00 2,442.69 2,442.69 6.331202-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 36,129.31 25,920.00 0.00 0.00 0.001202-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 25,920.00 90,664.00 2,916.68 2,916.68 3.221202-4180 Retirement 0.00 87,747.32 86,592.00 7,003.34 7,003.34 8.091202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 79,588.66 4,880.00 381.51 381.51 7.821202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 4,498.49 24,997.00 0.00 0.00 0.001202-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 24,997.00 Total Personal Services 724,166.00 48,293.21 48,293.21 0.00 675,872.79 6.67 1202-4200 Contract Services 131,570.00 0.00 0.00 0.001202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 131,570.00 Total Contract Services 131,570.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 131,570.00 0.00 1202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,000.00 17.32 17.32 0.871202-4304 Telephone 0.00 1,982.68 7,020.00 527.39 527.39 7.511202-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 6,492.61 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.001202-4315 Membership 0.00 600.00 7,020.00 1,250.00 1,250.00 17.811202-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 5,770.00 16,880.00 1,407.00 1,407.00 8.341202-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 15,473.00 2,113.00 176.00 176.00 8.331202-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 1,937.00 28,334.00 2,361.00 2,361.00 8.331202-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 25,973.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 63,967.00 5,738.71 5,738.71 0.00 58,228.29 8.97 1202-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Finance Administration 919,703.00 54,031.92 54,031.92 0.00 865,671.08 5.87 8Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Human Resources1203 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1203-4100 Personal Services 132,660.00 9,206.25 9,206.25 6.941203-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 123,453.75 3,221.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 3,221.00 16,650.00 285.36 285.36 1.711203-4180 Retirement 0.00 16,364.64 76,713.00 6,151.73 6,151.73 8.021203-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 70,561.27 2,138.00 133.47 133.47 6.241203-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 2,004.53 4,235.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 4,235.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-4191 Instant Bonuses 0.00 4,000.00 Total Personal Services 239,617.00 15,776.81 15,776.81 0.00 223,840.19 6.58 1203-4200 Contract Services 234,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 234,300.00 11,000.00 3,550.00 3,550.00 32.271203-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 7,450.00 Total Contract Services 245,300.00 3,550.00 3,550.00 0.00 241,750.00 1.45 1203-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,500.00 17.60 17.60 1.171203-4304 Telephone 0.00 1,482.40 3,000.00 251.68 251.68 8.391203-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 2,748.32 1,075.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-4315 Membership 0.00 1,075.00 13,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 13,500.00 12,000.00 976.00 976.00 8.131203-4320 Medical Exams 0.00 11,024.00 5,145.00 429.00 429.00 8.341203-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 4,716.00 612.00 51.00 51.00 8.331203-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 561.00 9,105.00 759.00 759.00 8.341203-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 8,346.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 45,937.00 2,484.28 2,484.28 0.00 43,452.72 5.41 1203-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Human Resources 530,854.00 21,811.09 21,811.09 0.00 509,042.91 4.11 9Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Finance Cashier1204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1204-4100 Personal Services 313,298.00 25,127.30 25,127.30 8.021204-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 288,170.70 4,339.00 17.05 17.05 0.391204-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 4,321.95 9,688.00 294.17 294.17 3.041204-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 9,393.83 41,597.00 4,036.97 4,036.97 9.701204-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 37,560.03 48,309.00 2,104.39 2,104.39 4.361204-4180 Retirement 0.00 46,204.61 84,489.00 6,816.87 6,816.87 8.071204-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 77,672.13 3,510.00 296.52 296.52 8.451204-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 3,213.48 21,360.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 21,360.00 Total Personal Services 526,590.00 38,693.27 38,693.27 0.00 487,896.73 7.35 1204-4200 Contract Services 140,371.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 140,371.00 Total Contract Services 140,371.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140,371.00 0.00 1204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3,832.00 69.37 69.37 1.811204-4304 Telephone 0.00 3,762.63 41,937.00 1,234.87 1,234.87 2.941204-4305 Office Operating Supplies 0.00 40,702.13 285.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-4315 Membership 0.00 285.00 3,987.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 3,987.00 19,271.00 1,606.00 1,606.00 8.331204-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 17,665.00 1,828.00 152.00 152.00 8.321204-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 1,676.00 19,883.00 1,657.00 1,657.00 8.331204-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 18,226.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 91,023.00 4,719.24 4,719.24 0.00 86,303.76 5.18 1204-5400 Equipment/Furniture 699.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 699.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 699.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 699.00 0.00 Total Finance Cashier 758,683.00 43,412.51 43,412.51 0.00 715,270.49 5.72 10Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 General Appropriations1208 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1208-4100 Personal Services 56,316.00 4,721.00 4,721.00 8.381208-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 51,595.00 1,548.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 1,548.00 4,074.00 338.16 338.16 8.301208-4180 Retirement 0.00 3,735.84 20,628.00 1,657.39 1,657.39 8.031208-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 18,970.61 817.00 68.46 68.46 8.381208-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 748.54 4,956.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 4,956.00 Total Personal Services 88,339.00 6,785.01 6,785.01 0.00 81,553.99 7.68 1208-4200 Contract Services 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 15.00 Total Contract Services 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 1208-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 115.00 0.69 0.69 0.601208-4304 Telephone 0.00 114.31 -15,000.00 -3,460.50 -3,460.50 23.071208-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 -11,539.50 16,149.00 1,346.00 1,346.00 8.331208-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 14,803.00 306.00 25.00 25.00 8.171208-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 281.00 3,835.00 320.00 320.00 8.341208-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 3,515.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 5,405.00 -1,768.81 -1,768.81 0.00 7,173.81 0.00 1208-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total General Appropriations 93,759.00 5,016.20 5,016.20 0.00 88,742.80 5.35 11Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Prospective Expenditures1214 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1214-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 114,020.00 0.00 0.00 0.001214-4322 Unclassified 0.00 114,020.00 Total Prospective Expenditures 114,020.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 114,020.00 0.00 12Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 13 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Legal Settlement- E&B Resources1220 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1220-4200 Contract Services Total Legal Settlement- E&B Resources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 14 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 726,950.00 60,579.00 60,579.00 8.331299-4399 OperatingTransfers Out 0.00 666,371.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 726,950.00 60,579.00 60,579.00 0.00 666,371.00 8.33 14Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 15 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Police2101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2101-4100 Personal Services 4,412,766.00 349,280.88 349,280.88 7.922101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 4,063,485.12 65,362.00 5,877.70 5,877.70 8.992101-4105 Special Duty Pay 0.00 59,484.30 265,285.00 45,733.95 45,733.95 17.242101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 219,551.05 874,463.00 31,685.70 31,685.70 3.622101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 842,777.30 12,000.00 673.89 673.89 5.622101-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 11,326.11 6,000.00 403.30 403.30 6.722101-4117 Shift Differential 0.00 5,596.70 7,000.00 1,410.40 1,410.40 20.152101-4118 Training Officer 0.00 5,589.60 2,669,080.00 225,229.80 225,229.80 8.442101-4180 Retirement 0.00 2,443,850.20 30,827.00 2,611.77 2,611.77 8.472101-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 28,215.23 838,337.00 69,146.48 69,146.48 8.252101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 769,190.52 63,065.00 6,328.98 6,328.98 10.042101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 56,736.02 367,595.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 367,595.00 Total Personal Services 9,611,780.00 738,382.85 738,382.85 0.00 8,873,397.15 7.68 2101-4200 Contract Services 112,257.00 23,292.26 23,292.26 20.752101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 88,964.74 631,224.00 133,019.00 133,019.00 21.072101-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 498,205.00 Total Contract Services 743,481.00 156,311.26 156,311.26 0.00 587,169.74 21.02 2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 59,760.00 921.66 921.66 1.542101-4304 Telephone 0.00 58,838.34 55,000.00 5,972.34 5,972.34 10.862101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 49,027.66 13,000.00 80.85 80.85 0.622101-4306 Prisoner Maintenance 0.00 12,919.15 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4307 Radio Maintenance 0.00 3,000.00 6,500.00 33.08 33.08 0.512101-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 6,466.92 15,000.00 1,158.00 1,158.00 7.722101-4312 Travel Expense , POST 0.00 13,842.00 7,162.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4313 Travel Expense, STC 0.00 7,162.00 22,991.00 562.19 562.19 2.452101-4314 Uniforms 0.00 22,428.81 4,044.00 630.00 630.00 15.582101-4315 Membership 0.00 3,414.00 41,486.00 4,891.22 4,891.22 11.792101-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 36,594.78 15Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 16 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Police2101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4,725.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4350 Safety Gear 0.00 4,725.00 300,938.00 25,078.00 25,078.00 8.332101-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 275,860.00 6,925.00 577.00 577.00 8.332101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 6,348.00 346,441.00 28,870.00 28,870.00 8.332101-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 317,571.00 1,204,346.00 100,362.00 100,362.00 8.332101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 1,103,984.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,091,318.00 169,136.34 169,136.34 0.00 1,922,181.66 8.09 2101-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 3,756.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 3,756.00 0.00 18,407.43 18,407.43 0.002101-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 -18,407.43 Total Equipment/Furniture 3,756.00 18,407.43 18,407.43 0.00 -14,651.43 490.08 2101-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Police 12,450,335.00 1,082,237.88 1,082,237.88 0.00 11,368,097.12 8.69 16Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 17 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Crossing Guard2102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2102-4200 Contract Services 98,982.00 0.00 0.00 0.002102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 98,982.00 Total Crossing Guard 98,982.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98,982.00 0.00 17Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 18 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Fire2201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2201-4100 Personal Services 1,933,472.00 154,017.58 154,017.58 7.972201-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 1,779,454.42 340,000.00 32,539.36 32,539.36 9.572201-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 307,460.64 172,800.00 27,183.04 27,183.04 15.732201-4108 FLSA Overtime 0.00 145,616.96 228,008.00 10,715.46 10,715.46 4.702201-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 217,292.54 272,802.00 10,732.75 10,732.75 3.932201-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 262,069.25 5,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4119 Fitness Incentive 0.00 5,600.00 1,022,730.00 88,313.42 88,313.42 8.642201-4180 Retirement 0.00 934,416.58 9,600.00 700.00 700.00 7.292201-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 8,900.00 220,204.00 17,221.42 17,221.42 7.822201-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 202,982.58 27,576.00 3,108.22 3,108.22 11.272201-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 24,467.78 132,747.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 132,747.00 Total Personal Services 4,365,539.00 344,531.25 344,531.25 0.00 4,021,007.75 7.89 2201-4200 Contract Services 107,050.00 4,975.55 4,975.55 4.652201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 102,074.45 78,212.00 16,627.37 16,627.37 21.262201-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 61,584.63 Total Contract Services 185,262.00 21,602.92 21,602.92 0.00 163,659.08 11.66 2201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 19,168.00 333.58 333.58 1.742201-4304 Telephone 0.00 18,834.42 21,960.00 459.20 459.20 2.092201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 21,500.80 37,407.00 1,215.61 1,215.61 3.252201-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 36,191.39 2,475.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4314 Uniforms 0.00 2,475.00 6,030.00 1,380.00 1,380.00 22.892201-4315 Membership 0.00 4,650.00 66,505.00 4,798.13 4,798.13 7.212201-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 61,706.87 46,662.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4350 Safety Gear 0.00 46,662.00 34,858.00 2,905.00 2,905.00 8.332201-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 31,953.00 4,325.00 360.00 360.00 8.322201-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 3,965.00 209,520.00 17,460.00 17,460.00 8.332201-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 192,060.00 796,826.00 66,402.00 66,402.00 8.332201-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 730,424.00 18Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 19 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Fire2201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1,245,736.00 95,313.52 95,313.52 0.00 1,150,422.48 7.65 2201-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2201-5400 Equipment/Furniture 0.00 -183.71 -183.71 0.002201-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 183.71 15,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 15,800.00 6,000.00 1,504.20 1,504.20 25.072201-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 4,495.80 Total Equipment/Furniture 21,800.00 1,320.49 1,320.49 0.00 20,479.51 6.06 2201-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Fire 5,818,337.00 462,768.18 462,768.18 0.00 5,355,568.82 7.95 19Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 20 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Sewers/Storm Drains3102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3102-4900 Depreciation Total Sewers/Storm Drains 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 21 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Street Maint/Traffic Safety3104 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3104-4100 Personal Services 291,221.00 19,983.90 19,983.90 6.863104-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 271,237.10 9,718.00 840.14 840.14 8.653104-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 8,877.86 12,791.00 374.80 374.80 2.933104-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 12,416.20 0.00 2,550.23 2,550.23 0.003104-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 -2,550.23 68,887.00 1,830.76 1,830.76 2.663104-4180 Retirement 0.00 67,056.24 66,853.00 4,174.45 4,174.45 6.243104-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 62,678.55 1,524.00 102.06 102.06 6.703104-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 1,421.94 21,219.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 21,219.00 Total Personal Services 472,213.00 29,856.34 29,856.34 0.00 442,356.66 6.32 3104-4200 Contract Services 259,626.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 259,626.00 6,657.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 6,657.00 Total Contract Services 266,283.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 266,283.00 0.00 3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 7,561.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-4303 Utilities 0.00 7,561.00 63,188.00 1,653.71 1,653.71 2.623104-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 61,534.29 666.00 55.00 55.00 8.263104-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 611.00 36,327.00 3,027.00 3,027.00 8.333104-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 33,300.00 237,573.00 19,798.00 19,798.00 8.333104-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 217,775.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 345,315.00 24,533.71 24,533.71 0.00 320,781.29 7.10 3104-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Street Maint/Traffic Safety 1,083,811.00 54,390.05 54,390.05 0.00 1,029,420.95 5.02 21Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 22 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Downtown Enhancement3301 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3301-4100 Personal Services 42,771.00 3,195.29 3,195.29 7.473301-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 39,575.71 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 1,200.00 7,463.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 7,463.00 8,189.00 252.90 252.90 3.093301-4180 Retirement 0.00 7,936.10 7,076.00 582.15 582.15 8.233301-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 6,493.85 637.00 47.89 47.89 7.523301-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 589.11 1,396.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits/OPEB 0.00 1,396.00 Total Personal Services 68,732.00 4,078.23 4,078.23 0.00 64,653.77 5.93 3301-4200 Contract Services 154,606.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 154,606.00 Total Contract Services 154,606.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 154,606.00 0.00 3301-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 2,000.00 221.00 18.00 18.00 8.143301-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 203.00 374.00 31.00 31.00 8.293301-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 343.00 19,454.00 1,621.00 1,621.00 8.333301-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 17,833.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 22,049.00 1,670.00 1,670.00 0.00 20,379.00 7.57 3301-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3301-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Downtown Enhancement 245,387.00 5,748.23 5,748.23 0.00 239,638.77 2.34 22Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 23 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Community Services3302 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3302-4100 Personal Services 860,897.00 63,052.92 63,052.92 7.323302-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 797,844.08 40,000.00 3,237.18 3,237.18 8.093302-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 36,762.82 69,223.00 1,131.93 1,131.93 1.643302-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 68,091.07 20,481.00 4,677.76 4,677.76 22.843302-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 15,803.24 7,525.00 505.44 505.44 6.723302-4117 Shift Differential 0.00 7,019.56 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4118 Field Training Officer 0.00 600.00 179,711.00 5,506.42 5,506.42 3.063302-4180 Retirement 0.00 174,204.58 6,240.00 440.94 440.94 7.073302-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 5,799.06 250,440.00 18,623.22 18,623.22 7.443302-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 231,816.78 11,786.00 1,059.41 1,059.41 8.993302-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 10,726.59 89,794.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 89,794.00 Total Personal Services 1,536,697.00 98,235.22 98,235.22 0.00 1,438,461.78 6.39 3302-4200 Contract Services 171,651.00 2,214.50 2,214.50 1.293302-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 169,436.50 66,510.00 16,627.38 16,627.38 25.003302-4251 Contract Services/Govt 0.00 49,882.62 Total Contract Services 238,161.00 18,841.88 18,841.88 0.00 219,319.12 7.91 3302-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 6,500.00 51.81 51.81 0.803302-4304 Telephone 0.00 6,448.19 18,000.00 595.18 595.18 3.313302-4305 Office Operating Supplies 0.00 17,404.82 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4307 Radio Maintenance 0.00 1,000.00 20,000.00 29.78 29.78 0.153302-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 19,970.22 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4314 Uniforms 0.00 5,000.00 540.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4315 Membership 0.00 540.00 1,365.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 1,365.00 89,495.00 7,458.00 7,458.00 8.333302-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 82,037.00 7,088.00 591.00 591.00 8.343302-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 6,497.00 91,278.00 7,607.00 7,607.00 8.333302-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 83,671.00 152,747.00 12,729.00 12,729.00 8.333302-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 140,018.00 23Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 24 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Community Services3302 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Materials/Supplies/Other 393,013.00 29,061.77 29,061.77 0.00 363,951.23 7.39 3302-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3302-5400 Equipment/Furniture 4,530.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 4,530.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 4,530.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,530.00 0.00 3302-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Community Services 2,172,401.00 146,138.87 146,138.87 0.00 2,026,262.13 6.73 24Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 25 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 North Pier Parking Structure3304 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3304-4200 Contract Services 115,243.00 17,149.90 17,149.90 14.883304-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 98,093.10 225.00 0.00 0.00 0.003304-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 225.00 Total Contract Services 115,468.00 17,149.90 17,149.90 0.00 98,318.10 14.85 3304-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 18,566.00 0.00 0.00 0.003304-4303 Utilities 0.00 18,566.00 543.00 0.00 0.00 0.003304-4304 Telephone 0.00 543.00 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.003304-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 4,500.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 23,609.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,609.00 0.00 3304-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total North Pier Parking Structure 139,077.00 17,149.90 17,149.90 0.00 121,927.10 12.33 25Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 26 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Downtown Parking Lot A3305 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3305-4200 Contract Services 47,756.00 188.00 188.00 0.393305-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 47,568.00 Total Contract Services 47,756.00 188.00 188.00 0.00 47,568.00 0.39 3305-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003305-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 2,000.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 3305-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Downtown Parking Lot A 49,756.00 188.00 188.00 0.00 49,568.00 0.38 26Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 27 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Co. Share Pkg Structure Rev.3306 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3306-4200 Contract Services 338,761.00 0.00 0.00 0.003306-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 338,761.00 Total Co. Share Pkg Structure Rev. 338,761.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 338,761.00 0.00 27Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 28 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Community Dev/Planning4101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4101-4100 Personal Services 506,278.00 27,049.76 27,049.76 5.344101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 479,228.24 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.004101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 250.00 11,950.00 0.00 0.00 0.004101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 11,950.00 0.00 6,044.97 6,044.97 0.004101-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 -6,044.97 102,058.00 2,390.68 2,390.68 2.344101-4180 Retirement 0.00 99,667.32 94,795.00 5,682.41 5,682.41 5.994101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 89,112.59 8,020.00 485.84 485.84 6.064101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 7,534.16 20,058.00 0.00 0.00 0.004101-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 20,058.00 Total Personal Services 743,409.00 41,653.66 41,653.66 0.00 701,755.34 5.60 4101-4200 Contract Services 33,656.00 1,499.00 1,499.00 4.454101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 32,157.00 Total Contract Services 33,656.00 1,499.00 1,499.00 0.00 32,157.00 4.45 4101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,000.00 11.90 11.90 0.604101-4304 Telephone 0.00 1,988.10 4,500.00 186.65 186.65 4.154101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 4,313.35 2,678.00 0.00 0.00 0.004101-4315 Membership 0.00 2,678.00 5,350.00 0.00 0.00 0.004101-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 5,350.00 11,064.00 922.00 922.00 8.334101-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 10,142.00 2,234.00 186.00 186.00 8.334101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 2,048.00 29,812.00 2,484.00 2,484.00 8.334101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 27,328.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 57,638.00 3,790.55 3,790.55 0.00 53,847.45 6.58 Total Community Dev/Planning 834,703.00 46,943.21 46,943.21 0.00 787,759.79 5.62 28Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 29 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Coastal Permit Auth Grant4104 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4104-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4104-4200 Contract Services 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004104-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 300,000.00 Total Contract Services 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300,000.00 0.00 4104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004104-4305 Office Operating Supplies 0.00 20,000.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 Total Coastal Permit Auth Grant 320,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 320,000.00 0.00 29Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 30 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Community Dev/Building4201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4201-4100 Personal Services 368,152.00 23,603.48 23,603.48 6.414201-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 344,548.52 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 250.00 12,558.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 12,558.00 19,958.00 2,377.52 2,377.52 11.914201-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 17,580.48 78,740.00 2,009.23 2,009.23 2.554201-4180 Retirement 0.00 76,730.77 69,926.00 4,148.51 4,148.51 5.934201-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 65,777.49 5,919.00 387.93 387.93 6.554201-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 5,531.07 18,968.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 18,968.00 Total Personal Services 574,471.00 32,526.67 32,526.67 0.00 541,944.33 5.66 4201-4200 Contract Services 150,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 150,500.00 Total Contract Services 150,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150,500.00 0.00 4201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4,800.00 20.10 20.10 0.424201-4304 Telephone 0.00 4,779.90 4,000.00 103.07 103.07 2.584201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 3,896.93 1,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4315 Membership 0.00 1,300.00 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 1,500.00 14,045.00 1,170.00 1,170.00 8.334201-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 12,875.00 1,409.00 117.00 117.00 8.304201-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 1,292.00 17,688.00 1,474.00 1,474.00 8.334201-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 16,214.00 30,666.00 2,556.00 2,556.00 8.334201-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 28,110.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 75,408.00 5,440.17 5,440.17 0.00 69,967.83 7.21 4201-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4201-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 31 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Community Dev/Building4201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Community Dev/Building 800,379.00 37,966.84 37,966.84 0.00 762,412.16 4.74 31Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 32 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4100 Personal Services 397,819.00 27,913.60 27,913.60 7.024202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 369,905.40 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 2,000.00 12,173.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 12,173.00 0.00 13,400.68 13,400.68 0.004202-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 -13,400.68 74,067.00 3,193.31 3,193.31 4.314202-4180 Retirement 0.00 70,873.69 74,278.00 4,651.03 4,651.03 6.264202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 69,626.97 6,351.00 625.49 625.49 9.854202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 5,725.51 19,975.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 19,975.00 Total Personal Services 586,663.00 49,784.11 49,784.11 0.00 536,878.89 8.49 4202-4200 Contract Services 235,030.00 162.70 162.70 0.074202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 234,867.30 Total Contract Services 235,030.00 162.70 162.70 0.00 234,867.30 0.07 4202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 22,821.00 62.47 62.47 0.274202-4304 Telephone 0.00 22,758.53 7,000.00 285.24 285.24 4.074202-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 6,714.76 6,678.00 87.38 87.38 1.314202-4314 Uniforms 0.00 6,590.62 1,385.00 145.00 145.00 10.474202-4315 Membership 0.00 1,240.00 9,933.00 1,100.65 1,100.65 11.084202-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 8,832.35 60,108.00 5,009.00 5,009.00 8.334202-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 55,099.00 6,478.00 540.00 540.00 8.344202-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 5,938.00 23,508.00 1,959.00 1,959.00 8.334202-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 21,549.00 58,513.00 4,876.00 4,876.00 8.334202-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 53,637.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 196,424.00 14,064.74 14,064.74 0.00 182,359.26 7.16 4202-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4202-5400 Equipment/Furniture 32Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 33 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4202-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Public Works Administration 1,018,117.00 64,011.55 64,011.55 0.00 954,105.45 6.29 33Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 34 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Building Maintenance4204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4204-4100 Personal Services 243,756.00 13,375.97 13,375.97 5.494204-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 230,380.03 9,000.00 1,220.68 1,220.68 13.564204-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 7,779.32 13,786.00 254.01 254.01 1.844204-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 13,531.99 0.00 7,363.02 7,363.02 0.004204-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 -7,363.02 55,843.00 1,348.15 1,348.15 2.414204-4180 Retirement 0.00 54,494.85 58,366.00 4,750.15 4,750.15 8.144204-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 53,615.85 3,405.00 310.94 310.94 9.134204-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 3,094.06 16,913.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 16,913.00 Total Personal Services 401,069.00 28,622.92 28,622.92 0.00 372,446.08 7.14 4204-4200 Contract Services 119,103.00 4,091.00 4,091.00 3.434204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 115,012.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 225.00 Total Contract Services 119,328.00 4,091.00 4,091.00 0.00 115,237.00 3.43 4204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 178,559.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4303 Utilities 0.00 178,559.00 1,000.00 79.96 79.96 8.004204-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 920.04 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4321 Building Sfty/Security 0.00 6,000.00 652.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 652.00 667.00 56.00 56.00 8.404204-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 611.00 11,556.00 963.00 963.00 8.334204-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 10,593.00 59,943.00 4,995.00 4,995.00 8.334204-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 54,948.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 258,377.00 6,093.96 6,093.96 0.00 252,283.04 2.36 4204-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4204-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 35 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Building Maintenance4204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4204-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Building Maintenance 778,774.00 38,807.88 38,807.88 0.00 739,966.12 4.98 35Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 36 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Community Resources4601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4601-4100 Personal Services 224,895.00 15,314.89 15,314.89 6.814601-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 209,580.11 3,000.00 514.25 514.25 17.144601-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 2,485.75 9,986.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 9,986.00 263,871.00 29,548.14 29,548.14 11.204601-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 234,322.86 43,980.00 2,553.15 2,553.15 5.814601-4180 Retirement 0.00 41,426.85 67,563.00 3,481.50 3,481.50 5.154601-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 64,081.50 3,555.00 680.35 680.35 19.144601-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 2,874.65 10,949.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 10,949.00 Total Personal Services 627,799.00 52,092.28 52,092.28 0.00 575,706.72 8.30 4601-4200 Contract Services 94,500.00 9,639.77 9,639.77 10.204601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 84,860.23 245,000.00 40,342.51 40,342.51 16.474601-4221 Contract Rec Classes/Programs 0.00 204,657.49 Total Contract Services 339,500.00 49,982.28 49,982.28 0.00 289,517.72 14.72 4601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 14,000.00 3,670.66 3,670.66 26.224601-4302 Advertising 0.00 10,329.34 5,000.00 30.52 30.52 0.614601-4304 Telephone 0.00 4,969.48 13,000.00 201.29 201.29 1.554601-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 12,798.71 20,525.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4308 Program Materials 0.00 20,525.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4315 Membership 0.00 2,000.00 15,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 15,500.00 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4328 Hermosa Senior Center Programs 0.00 6,000.00 25,756.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 8.544601-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 23,556.00 35,235.00 2,937.00 2,937.00 8.344601-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 32,298.00 12,245.00 1,020.00 1,020.00 8.334601-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 11,225.00 81,909.00 6,826.00 6,826.00 8.334601-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 75,083.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 231,170.00 16,885.47 16,885.47 0.00 214,284.53 7.30 4601-4900 Depreciation 36Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 37 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Community Resources4601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4601-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4601-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Community Resources 1,198,469.00 118,960.03 118,960.03 0.00 1,079,508.97 9.93 37Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 38 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Parks6101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 6101-4100 Personal Services 206,946.00 10,691.94 10,691.94 5.176101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 196,254.06 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 1,500.00 9,028.00 1,521.10 1,521.10 16.856101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 7,506.90 38,261.00 812.10 812.10 2.126101-4180 Retirement 0.00 37,448.90 57,806.00 3,494.45 3,494.45 6.056101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 54,311.55 3,017.00 178.60 178.60 5.926101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 2,838.40 13,538.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 13,538.00 Total Personal Services 330,096.00 16,698.19 16,698.19 0.00 313,397.81 5.06 6101-4200 Contract Services 220,855.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 220,855.00 198.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 198.00 Total Contract Services 221,053.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 221,053.00 0.00 6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 226,152.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-4303 Utilities 0.00 226,152.00 22,658.00 911.21 911.21 4.026101-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 21,746.79 21,867.00 1,823.00 1,823.00 8.346101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 20,044.00 21,458.00 1,788.00 1,788.00 8.336101-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 19,670.00 64,851.00 5,404.00 5,404.00 8.336101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 59,447.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 356,986.00 9,926.21 9,926.21 0.00 347,059.79 2.78 6101-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 0.00 474.15 474.15 0.006101-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 -474.15 2,120.00 427.72 427.72 20.186101-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 1,692.28 Total Equipment/Furniture 2,120.00 901.87 901.87 0.00 1,218.13 42.54 38Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 39 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Parks6101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 6101-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Parks 910,255.00 27,526.27 27,526.27 0.00 882,728.73 3.02 39Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 40 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Str Improvements/Various Locations8128 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8128-4200 Contract Services 208,468.00 0.00 0.00 0.008128-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 208,468.00 Total Str Improvements/Various Locations 208,468.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 208,468.00 0.00 40Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 41 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore8129 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8129-4200 Contract Services 220,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008129-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 220,000.00 Total Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore 220,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 220,000.00 0.00 41Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 42 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 PCH-Aviation Beautification Project8143 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8143-4200 Contract Services 192,905.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 192,905.00 Total PCH-Aviation Beautification Project 192,905.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 192,905.00 0.00 42Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 43 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Valley Drive Sharrows8168 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8168-4200 Contract Services 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008168-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 20,000.00 Total Valley Drive Sharrows 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 43Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 44 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Overlay Valley Dr/Ardmore8173 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8173-4200 Contract Services 188,917.00 0.00 0.00 0.008173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 188,917.00 Total Overlay Valley Dr/Ardmore 188,917.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 188,917.00 0.00 44Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 45 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Sewer Improvements- Various Locations8402 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8402-4200 Contract Services 104,975.00 0.00 0.00 0.008402-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 104,975.00 Total Sewer Improvements- Various Locations 104,975.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 104,975.00 0.00 45Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 46 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 South Park Phase I Improvements8537 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8537-4200 Contract Services 183,334.00 44,128.54 44,128.54 24.078537-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 139,205.46 Total South Park Phase I Improvements 183,334.00 44,128.54 44,128.54 0.00 139,205.46 24.07 46Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 47 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Citywide Park Master Plan8538 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8538-4200 Contract Services 83,592.00 0.00 0.00 0.008538-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 83,592.00 Total Citywide Park Master Plan 83,592.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83,592.00 0.00 47Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 48 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Clark Field Energy Upgrades Ph II8541 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8541-4200 Contract Services 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008541-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 100,000.00 Total Clark Field Energy Upgrades Ph II 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 48Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 49 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Fire Station Renovations & Upgrades8607 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8607-4200 Contract Services 134,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.008607-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 134,500.00 Total Fire Station Renovations & Upgrades 134,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 134,500.00 0.00 49Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 50 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Civic Center Strategic Plan8609 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8609-4200 Contract Services 247,832.00 0.00 0.00 0.008609-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 247,832.00 Total Civic Center Strategic Plan 247,832.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247,832.00 0.00 50Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 51 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Police Facilities Impovements8614 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8614-4200 Contract Services 107,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008614-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 107,000.00 Total Police Facilities Impovements 107,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 107,000.00 0.00 51Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 52 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 City Yard Renovations8615 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8615-4200 Contract Services 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008615-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 50,000.00 Total City Yard Renovations 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 52Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 53 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Pier Architectural Upgrades8621 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8621-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Pier Architectural Upgrades 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 54 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Fire Department Tower Demolition8632 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8632-4200 Contract Services 224,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008632-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 224,000.00 Total Fire Department Tower Demolition 224,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 224,000.00 0.00 54Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 55 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Municipal Solar Facility Plan/Install8634 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8634-4200 Contract Services 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008634-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 50,000.00 Total Municipal Solar Facility Plan/Install 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 55Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 56 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Community Center Gen Improvement Phase 38650 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8650-4200 Contract Services 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008650-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 50,000.00 Total Community Center Gen Improvement Phase 3 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 56Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 57 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Lot A Trash Enclosure8651 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8651-4200 Contract Services 0.00 1,068.20 1,068.20 0.008651-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -1,068.20 Total Lot A Trash Enclosure 0.00 1,068.20 1,068.20 0.00 -1,068.20 0.00 57Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 58 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Citywide Energy Conservation Upgrades8656 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8656-4200 Contract Services 40,946.00 0.00 0.00 0.008656-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 40,946.00 Total Citywide Energy Conservation Upgrades 40,946.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,946.00 0.00 58Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 59 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Lawn Bowling Lighting8657 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8657-4200 Contract Services 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008657-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 100,000.00 Total Lawn Bowling Lighting 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 59Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 60 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Hermosa Beach Surfing Memorial8661 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8661-4200 Contract Services 29,067.00 0.00 0.00 0.008661-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 29,067.00 Total Hermosa Beach Surfing Memorial 29,067.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,067.00 0.00 60Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 61 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 City Fac. Condition Assessm.& Asbesto Rp8664 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8664-4200 Contract Services 95,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008664-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 95,000.00 Total City Fac. Condition Assessm.& Asbesto Rp 95,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95,000.00 0.00 61Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 62 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 LED Lights for Lot D8665 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8665-4200 Contract Services 16,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.008665-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 16,500.00 Total LED Lights for Lot D 16,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,500.00 0.00 62Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 63 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 General Fund001 Community Center, Plaza, and Park Improv8667 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8667-4200 Contract Services 46,807.00 0.00 0.00 0.008667-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 46,807.00 Total Community Center, Plaza, and Park Improv 46,807.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46,807.00 0.00 Total General Fund 35,844,689.00 2,436,802.26 2,436,802.26 0.00 33,407,886.74 6.80 63Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 64 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund105 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 8,345.00 695.00 695.00 8.331299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 7,650.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 8,345.00 695.00 695.00 0.00 7,650.00 8.33 64Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 65 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund105 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians2601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2601-4100 Personal Services 84,872.00 7,074.95 7,074.95 8.342601-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 77,797.05 1,500.00 131.52 131.52 8.772601-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 1,368.48 4,466.00 28.22 28.22 0.632601-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 4,437.78 20,783.00 590.82 590.82 2.842601-4180 Retirement 0.00 20,192.18 17,357.00 1,697.56 1,697.56 9.782601-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 15,659.44 1,239.00 105.72 105.72 8.532601-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 1,133.28 6,084.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 6,084.00 Total Personal Services 136,301.00 9,628.79 9,628.79 0.00 126,672.21 7.06 2601-4200 Contract Services 44,492.00 200.00 200.00 0.452601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 44,292.00 20,493.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 20,493.00 Total Contract Services 64,985.00 200.00 200.00 0.00 64,785.00 0.31 2601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 229,685.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4303 Utilities 0.00 229,685.00 28,300.00 218.00 218.00 0.772601-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 28,082.00 667.00 51.00 51.00 7.652601-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 616.00 40,054.00 3,338.00 3,338.00 8.332601-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 36,716.00 29,842.00 2,487.00 2,487.00 8.332601-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 27,355.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 328,548.00 6,094.00 6,094.00 0.00 322,454.00 1.85 Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 529,834.00 15,922.79 15,922.79 0.00 513,911.21 3.01 Total Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 538,179.00 16,617.79 16,617.79 0.00 521,561.21 3.09 65Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 66 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 State Gas Tax Fund115 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 316,000.00 26,333.00 26,333.00 8.331299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 289,667.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 316,000.00 26,333.00 26,333.00 0.00 289,667.00 8.33 66Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 67 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 State Gas Tax Fund115 Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore8129 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8129-4200 Contract Services 204,078.00 0.00 0.00 0.008129-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 204,078.00 Total Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore 204,078.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 204,078.00 0.00 67Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 68 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 State Gas Tax Fund115 PCH-Aviation Beautification Project8143 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8143-4200 Contract Services 34,581.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 34,581.00 Total PCH-Aviation Beautification Project 34,581.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,581.00 0.00 Total State Gas Tax Fund 554,659.00 26,333.00 26,333.00 0.00 528,326.00 4.75 68Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 69 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 AB939 Fund117 Source Redctn/Recycle Element5301 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 5301-4100 Personal Services 22,754.00 3,104.20 3,104.20 13.645301-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 19,649.80 0.00 29.64 29.64 0.005301-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -29.64 5,978.00 240.36 240.36 4.025301-4180 Retirement 0.00 5,737.64 3,128.00 416.55 416.55 13.325301-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 2,711.45 341.00 47.31 47.31 13.875301-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 293.69 Total Personal Services 32,201.00 3,838.06 3,838.06 0.00 28,362.94 11.92 5301-4200 Contract Services 19,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.005301-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 19,500.00 Total Contract Services 19,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,500.00 0.00 5301-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3,000.00 2,365.68 2,365.68 78.865301-4315 Membership 0.00 634.32 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3,000.00 2,365.68 2,365.68 0.00 634.32 78.86 Total AB939 Fund 54,701.00 6,203.74 6,203.74 0.00 48,497.26 11.34 69Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 70 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Prop A Open Space Fund121 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 20,557.00 1,713.00 1,713.00 8.331299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 18,844.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 20,557.00 1,713.00 1,713.00 0.00 18,844.00 8.33 70Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 71 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Prop A Open Space Fund121 South Park Phase I Improvements8537 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8537-4200 Contract Services 41,470.00 0.00 0.00 0.008537-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 41,470.00 Total South Park Phase I Improvements 41,470.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41,470.00 0.00 Total Prop A Open Space Fund 62,027.00 1,713.00 1,713.00 0.00 60,314.00 2.76 71Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 72 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Tyco Fund122 Street Improvements- Various Locations8128 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8128-4200 Contract Services 228,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008128-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 228,000.00 Total Street Improvements- Various Locations 228,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 228,000.00 0.00 72Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 73 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Tyco Fund122 Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore8129 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8129-4200 Contract Services 201,257.00 0.00 0.00 0.008129-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 201,257.00 Total Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore 201,257.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 201,257.00 0.00 73Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 74 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Tyco Fund122 8th Street- Safe Route to School Project8173 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8173-4200 Contract Services 140,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 140,000.00 Total 8th Street- Safe Route to School Project 140,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140,000.00 0.00 74Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 75 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Tyco Fund122 City Fac. ADA Transition Plan & Improv.8655 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8655-4200 Contract Services 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008655-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 20,000.00 Total City Fac. ADA Transition Plan & Improv. 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 75Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 76 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Tyco Fund122 Municipal Pier Structural Repairs Ph.II8659 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8659-4200 Contract Services 130,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008659-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 130,000.00 Total Contract Services 130,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 130,000.00 0.00 Total Municipal Pier Structural Repairs Ph.II 130,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 130,000.00 0.00 Total Tyco Fund 719,257.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 719,257.00 0.00 76Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 77 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Tyco Tidelands123 Municipal Pier Structural Repairs II8659 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8659-4200 Contract Services 3,318.00 0.00 0.00 0.008659-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 3,318.00 Total Tyco Tidelands 3,318.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,318.00 0.00 77Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 78 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 South Park Phase I Improvements8537 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8537-4200 Contract Services 381,840.00 0.00 0.00 0.008537-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 381,840.00 Total South Park Phase I Improvements 381,840.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 381,840.00 0.00 78Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 79 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Citywide Park Master Plan8538 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8538-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8538-4200 Contract Services 60,261.00 0.00 0.00 0.008538-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 60,261.00 Total Citywide Park Master Plan 60,261.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,261.00 0.00 79Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 80 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Clark Field Energy Efficient Upgrades II8541 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8541-4200 Contract Services 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008541-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 100,000.00 Total Clark Field Energy Efficient Upgrades II 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 80Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 81 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Clark Field Electrical8602 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8602-4200 Contract Services Total Clark Field Electrical 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 81Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 82 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Citywide Energy Conservation Upgrades8656 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8656-4200 Contract Services 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008656-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 25,000.00 Total Citywide Energy Conservation Upgrades 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 82Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 83 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Community Center, Plaza, and Park Improv8667 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8667-4200 Contract Services 22,881.00 0.00 0.00 0.008667-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 22,881.00 Total Community Center, Plaza, and Park Improv 22,881.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,881.00 0.00 Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 589,982.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 589,982.00 0.00 83Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 84 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund135 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services 2,208.00 0.00 0.00 0.001219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 2,208.00 Total Administrative Charges 2,208.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,208.00 0.00 84Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 85 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund135 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,868.00 239.00 239.00 8.331299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out 0.00 2,629.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 2,868.00 239.00 239.00 0.00 2,629.00 8.33 Total Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund 5,076.00 239.00 239.00 0.00 4,837.00 4.71 85Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 86 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund136 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services 1,932.00 0.00 0.00 0.001219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 1,932.00 Total Administrative Charges 1,932.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,932.00 0.00 86Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 87 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund136 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,249.00 187.00 187.00 8.311299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 2,062.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 2,249.00 187.00 187.00 0.00 2,062.00 8.31 Total Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund 4,181.00 187.00 187.00 0.00 3,994.00 4.47 87Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 88 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund137 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services 6,865.00 0.00 0.00 0.001219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 6,865.00 Total Administrative Charges 6,865.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,865.00 0.00 88Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 89 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund137 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 5,264.00 439.00 439.00 8.341299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 4,825.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 5,264.00 439.00 439.00 0.00 4,825.00 8.34 Total Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund 12,129.00 439.00 439.00 0.00 11,690.00 3.62 89Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 90 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund138 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services 7,176.00 0.00 0.00 0.001219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 7,176.00 Total Administrative Charges 7,176.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,176.00 0.00 90Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 91 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund138 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 5,710.00 476.00 476.00 8.341299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 5,234.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 5,710.00 476.00 476.00 0.00 5,234.00 8.34 Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 12,886.00 476.00 476.00 0.00 12,410.00 3.69 91Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 92 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund139 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services 1,874.00 0.00 0.00 0.001219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 1,874.00 Total Administrative Charges 1,874.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,874.00 0.00 92Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 93 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund139 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,891.00 158.00 158.00 8.361299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 1,733.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 1,891.00 158.00 158.00 0.00 1,733.00 8.36 Total Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 3,765.00 158.00 158.00 0.00 3,607.00 4.20 93Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 94 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Community Dev Block Grant140 CDBG Program General Admin4707 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4707-4200 Contract Services 6,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.004707-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 6,600.00 Total CDBG Program General Admin 6,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,600.00 0.00 94Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 95 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Community Dev Block Grant140 City Fac. ADA Transition Plan & Improv.8655 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8655-4200 Contract Services 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008655-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 30,000.00 Total City Fac. ADA Transition Plan & Improv. 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 95Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 96 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Community Dev Block Grant140 City Right of Way ADA Improvements8657 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8657-4200 Contract Services 138,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008657-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 138,000.00 Total City Right of Way ADA Improvements 138,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 138,000.00 0.00 Total Community Dev Block Grant 174,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174,600.00 0.00 96Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 97 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Proposition A Fund145 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Interfund Transfers Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 97Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 98 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Proposition A Fund145 Bus Pass Subsidy3403 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3403-4200 Contract Services 3,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.003403-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 3,300.00 Total Bus Pass Subsidy 3,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,300.00 0.00 98Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 99 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Proposition A Fund145 Dial-A-Taxi Program3404 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3404-4200 Contract Services 69,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003404-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 69,000.00 Total Dial-A-Taxi Program 69,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 69,000.00 0.00 99Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 100 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Proposition A Fund145 Commuter Express3408 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3408-4100 Personal Services 2,168.00 195.44 195.44 9.013408-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 1,972.56 Total Personal Services 2,168.00 195.44 195.44 0.00 1,972.56 9.01 3408-4200 Contract Services 14,455.00 0.00 0.00 0.003408-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 14,455.00 Total Contract Services 14,455.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,455.00 0.00 Total Commuter Express 16,623.00 195.44 195.44 0.00 16,427.56 1.18 100Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 101 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Proposition A Fund145 Recreation Transportation3409 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3409-4200 Contract Services 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003409-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 40,000.00 Total Recreation Transportation 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,000.00 0.00 101Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 102 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Proposition A Fund145 Special Event Shuttle3410 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3410-4200 Contract Services 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003410-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 6,000.00 Total Special Event Shuttle 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,000.00 0.00 102Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 103 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Proposition A Fund145 Beach Cities Transit Line 1093412 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3412-4200 Contract Services 10,391.00 0.00 0.00 0.003412-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 10,391.00 Total Beach Cities Transit Line 109 10,391.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,391.00 0.00 103Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 104 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Proposition A Fund145 PCH-Aviation Beautification Project8143 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8143-4200 Contract Services 274,892.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 274,892.00 Total PCH-Aviation Beautification Project 274,892.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 274,892.00 0.00 Total Proposition A Fund 420,206.00 195.44 195.44 0.00 420,010.56 0.05 104Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 105 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Proposition C Fund146 Pavement Management Study4208 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4208-4200 Contract Services 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004208-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 30,000.00 Total Pavement Management Study 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 105Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 106 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Proposition C Fund146 PCH-Aviation Beautification Project8143 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8143-4200 Contract Services 533,326.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 533,326.00 Total PCH-Aviation Beautification Project 533,326.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 533,326.00 0.00 Total Proposition C Fund 563,326.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 563,326.00 0.00 106Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 107 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Measure R Fund147 Str Improvements/Various Locations8128 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8128-4200 Contract Services 296,157.00 0.00 0.00 0.008128-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 296,157.00 Total Str Improvements/Various Locations 296,157.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 296,157.00 0.00 107Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 108 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Measure R Fund147 Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore8129 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8129-4200 Contract Services 201,326.00 0.00 0.00 0.008129-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 201,326.00 Total Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore 201,326.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 201,326.00 0.00 108Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 109 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Measure R Fund147 PCH Traffic Improvements8160 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8160-4200 Contract Services 140,714.00 0.00 0.00 0.008160-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 140,714.00 Total PCH Traffic Improvements 140,714.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140,714.00 0.00 Total Measure R Fund 638,197.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 638,197.00 0.00 109Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 110 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Grants Fund150 Bulletproof Vest Partnership2111 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2111-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3,125.00 0.00 0.00 0.002111-4350 Safety Gear 0.00 3,125.00 Total Bulletproof Vest Partnership 3,125.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,125.00 0.00 110Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 111 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Grants Fund150 Beverage Recycle Grant3102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3102-4200 Contract Services 5,455.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 5,455.00 Total Beverage Recycle Grant 5,455.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,455.00 0.00 111Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 112 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Grants Fund150 Sea Level Rise Study/Coastal Conservancy3106 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3106-4200 Contract Services 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 50,000.00 Total Sea Level Rise Study/Coastal Conservancy 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 112Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 113 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Grants Fund150 Coastal Permit Auth Grant4104 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4104-4200 Contract Services 82,234.00 0.00 0.00 0.004104-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 82,234.00 Total Contract Services 82,234.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82,234.00 0.00 4104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Coastal Permit Auth Grant 82,234.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82,234.00 0.00 113Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 114 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Grants Fund150 Local Coastal Assistance Grant4107 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4107-4200 Contract Services 36,834.00 0.00 0.00 0.004107-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 36,834.00 Total Local Coastal Assistance Grant 36,834.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,834.00 0.00 114Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 115 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Grants Fund150 PCH Traffic Improvements8160 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8160-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8160-4200 Contract Services 95,261.00 0.00 0.00 0.008160-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 95,261.00 Total PCH Traffic Improvements 95,261.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95,261.00 0.00 115Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 116 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Grants Fund150 Hermosa Beach Surfing Memorial8661 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8661-4200 Contract Services 275,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008661-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 275,000.00 Total Hermosa Beach Surfing Memorial 275,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 275,000.00 0.00 Total Grants Fund 547,909.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 547,909.00 0.00 116Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 117 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund152 Emission Control3701 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3701-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3701-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 28,600.00 330.00 330.00 1.153701-4327 AQMD Incentives 0.00 28,270.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 28,600.00 330.00 330.00 0.00 28,270.00 1.15 3701-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3701-5400 Equipment/Furniture 28,611.00 0.00 0.00 0.003701-5403 Vehicles 0.00 28,611.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 28,611.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,611.00 0.00 Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 57,211.00 330.00 330.00 0.00 56,881.00 0.58 117Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 118 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)153 C.O.P.S. Program2106 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2106-4200 Contract Services 40,471.00 16,892.45 16,892.45 41.742106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 23,578.55 Total Contract Services 40,471.00 16,892.45 16,892.45 0.00 23,578.55 41.74 2106-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2106-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2106-5400 Equipment/Furniture 0.00 24,211.26 24,211.26 0.002106-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 -24,211.26 Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 24,211.26 24,211.26 0.00 -24,211.26 0.00 2106-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF) 40,471.00 41,103.71 41,103.71 0.00 -632.71 101.56 118Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 119 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Sewer Fund160 Sewers/Storm Drains3102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3102-4100 Personal Services 59,115.00 2,907.25 2,907.25 4.923102-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 56,207.75 410.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 410.00 3,034.00 95.49 95.49 3.153102-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 2,938.51 0.00 910.77 910.77 0.003102-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 -910.77 9,602.00 286.33 286.33 2.983102-4180 Retirement 0.00 9,315.67 11,717.00 668.78 668.78 5.713102-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 11,048.22 866.00 57.58 57.58 6.653102-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 808.42 1,877.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 1,877.00 Total Personal Services 86,621.00 4,926.20 4,926.20 0.00 81,694.80 5.69 3102-4200 Contract Services 178,985.00 9,642.00 9,642.00 5.393102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 169,343.00 1,940.00 75.00 75.00 3.873102-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 1,865.00 Total Contract Services 180,925.00 9,717.00 9,717.00 0.00 171,208.00 5.37 3102-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 907.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4303 Utilities 0.00 907.00 7,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 7,600.00 267.00 22.00 22.00 8.243102-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 245.00 7,195.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 7,195.00 10,449.00 871.00 871.00 8.343102-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 9,578.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 26,418.00 893.00 893.00 0.00 25,525.00 3.38 3102-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3102-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Sewers/Storm Drains 293,964.00 15,536.20 15,536.20 0.00 278,427.80 5.29 119Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 120 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Sewer Fund160 Used Oil Block Grant3105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3105-4200 Contract Services 5,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.003105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 5,800.00 Total Used Oil Block Grant 5,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,800.00 0.00 120Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 121 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Sewer Fund160 Sewer Improvements Various Locations8403 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8403-4200 Contract Services 5,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008403-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 5,500,000.00 Total Sewer Improvements Various Locations 5,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,500,000.00 0.00 Total Sewer Fund 5,799,764.00 15,536.20 15,536.20 0.00 5,784,227.80 0.27 121Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 122 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Storm Drains Fund161 Storm Drain3109 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3109-4100 Personal Services 63,387.00 2,534.57 2,534.57 4.003109-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 60,852.43 590.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 590.00 3,421.00 78.30 78.30 2.293109-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 3,342.70 0.00 182.17 182.17 0.003109-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 -182.17 10,739.00 208.85 208.85 1.943109-4180 Retirement 0.00 10,530.15 13,706.00 527.87 527.87 3.853109-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 13,178.13 928.00 41.25 41.25 4.453109-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 886.75 2,390.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits/OPEB 0.00 2,390.00 Total Personal Services 95,161.00 3,573.01 3,573.01 0.00 91,587.99 3.75 3109-4200 Contract Services 224,588.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 224,588.00 35,816.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 35,816.00 Total Contract Services 260,404.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 260,404.00 0.00 3109-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 11,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 11,400.00 400.00 33.00 33.00 8.253109-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 367.00 40,771.00 3,998.00 3,998.00 9.813109-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 36,773.00 15,673.00 1,306.00 1,306.00 8.333109-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 14,367.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 68,244.00 5,337.00 5,337.00 0.00 62,907.00 7.82 Total Storm Drains Fund 423,809.00 8,910.01 8,910.01 0.00 414,898.99 2.10 122Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 123 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170 Special Investigations2103 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2103-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2103-5400 Equipment/Furniture 0.00 129,092.40 129,092.40 0.002103-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 -129,092.40 Total Special Investigations 0.00 129,092.40 129,092.40 0.00 -129,092.40 0.00 123Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 124 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170 Police K-9 Program2105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2105-4200 Contract Services 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.002105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 2,500.00 Total Contract Services 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 2105-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.002105-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 1,600.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.002105-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 3,000.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,600.00 0.00 2105-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2105-5400 Equipment/Furniture 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.002105-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 600.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600.00 0.00 Total Police K-9 Program 7,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,700.00 0.00 124Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 125 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170 Mounted Patrol Unit2116 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2116-4200 Contract Services 5,400.00 298.44 298.44 5.532116-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 5,101.56 Total Mounted Patrol Unit 5,400.00 298.44 298.44 0.00 5,101.56 5.53 Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 13,100.00 129,390.84 129,390.84 0.00 -116,290.84 987.72 125Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 126 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds201 Legal Settlements- E&B Resources1220 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1220-4200 Contract Services Total 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 126Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 127 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Capital Improvement Fund301 Street Improvements- Various Locations8128 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8128-4200 Contract Services 16,843.00 0.00 0.00 0.008128-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 16,843.00 Total Street Improvements- Various Locations 16,843.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,843.00 0.00 127Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 128 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Capital Improvement Fund301 Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore8129 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8129-4200 Contract Services 191,339.00 0.00 0.00 0.008129-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 191,339.00 Total Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore 191,339.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 191,339.00 0.00 128Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 129 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Capital Improvement Fund301 Gould Avenue Street Improvements8141 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8141-4200 Contract Services 67,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.008141-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 67,450.00 Total Gould Avenue Street Improvements 67,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67,450.00 0.00 129Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 130 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Capital Improvement Fund301 PCH-Aviation Beautification Project8143 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8143-4200 Contract Services 264,296.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 264,296.00 Total PCH-Aviation Beautification Project 264,296.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 264,296.00 0.00 130Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 131 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Capital Improvement Fund301 Lawn Bowling Green Comple Lighting8503 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8503-4200 Contract Services 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008503-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 60,000.00 Total Lawn Bowling Green Comple Lighting 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 131Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 132 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Capital Improvement Fund301 South Park Phase I Improvements8537 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8537-4200 Contract Services 114,259.00 44,128.55 44,128.55 38.628537-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 70,130.45 Total South Park Phase I Improvements 114,259.00 44,128.55 44,128.55 0.00 70,130.45 38.62 132Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 133 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Capital Improvement Fund301 Clark Field Energy Efficient Upgrade II8541 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8541-4200 Contract Services 27,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008541-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 27,000.00 Total Clark Field Energy Efficient Upgrade II 27,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,000.00 0.00 133Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 134 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Capital Improvement Fund301 Fire Station Seismic Upgrade8660 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8660-4200 Contract Services 200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008660-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 200,000.00 Total Fire Station Seismic Upgrade 200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200,000.00 0.00 Total Capital Improvement Fund 941,187.00 44,128.55 44,128.55 0.00 897,058.45 4.69 134Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 135 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Insurance Fund705 Liability Insurance1209 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1209-4100 Personal Services 34,298.00 2,652.53 2,652.53 7.731209-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 31,645.47 2,423.00 0.00 0.00 0.001209-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 2,423.00 6,008.00 142.71 142.71 2.381209-4180 Retirement 0.00 5,865.29 7,417.00 383.68 383.68 5.171209-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 7,033.32 533.00 38.48 38.48 7.221209-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 494.52 Total Personal Services 50,679.00 3,217.40 3,217.40 0.00 47,461.60 6.35 1209-4200 Contract Services 652,264.00 802,786.00 802,786.00 123.081209-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -150,522.00 Total Contract Services 652,264.00 802,786.00 802,786.00 0.00 -150,522.00 123.08 1209-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.001209-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 200.00 360.00 0.00 0.00 0.001209-4315 Membership 0.00 360.00 600,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001209-4324 Claims/Settlements 0.00 600,000.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 600,560.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600,560.00 0.00 Total Liability Insurance 1,303,503.00 806,003.40 806,003.40 0.00 497,499.60 61.83 135Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 136 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Insurance Fund705 Auto/Property/Bonds1210 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1210-4200 Contract Services 63,193.00 0.00 0.00 0.001210-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 63,193.00 Total Contract Services 63,193.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 63,193.00 0.00 1210-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001210-4324 Claims/Settlements 0.00 10,000.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 Total Auto/Property/Bonds 73,193.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 73,193.00 0.00 136Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 137 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Insurance Fund705 Unemployment1215 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1215-4100 Personal Services 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001215-4186 Unemployment Claims 0.00 10,000.00 Total Unemployment 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 137Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 138 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Insurance Fund705 Workers' Compensation1217 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1217-4100 Personal Services 34,298.00 2,652.55 2,652.55 7.731217-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 31,645.45 2,219.00 0.00 0.00 0.001217-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 2,219.00 6,008.00 142.71 142.71 2.381217-4180 Retirement 0.00 5,865.29 7,418.00 383.69 383.69 5.171217-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 7,034.31 533.00 38.48 38.48 7.221217-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 494.52 Total Personal Services 50,476.00 3,217.43 3,217.43 0.00 47,258.57 6.37 1217-4200 Contract Services 235,776.00 5,795.00 5,795.00 2.461217-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 229,981.00 Total Contract Services 235,776.00 5,795.00 5,795.00 0.00 229,981.00 2.46 1217-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 100.00 7.98 7.98 7.981217-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 92.02 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001217-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 1,000.00 1,200,000.00 72,874.46 72,874.46 6.071217-4324 Claims/Settlements 0.00 1,127,125.54 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1,201,100.00 72,882.44 72,882.44 0.00 1,128,217.56 6.07 Total Workers' Compensation 1,487,352.00 81,894.87 81,894.87 0.00 1,405,457.13 5.51 Total Insurance Fund 2,874,048.00 887,898.27 887,898.27 0.00 1,986,149.73 30.89 138Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 139 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 City Council1101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1101-4900 Depreciation 5,437.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-4903 Depreciation/Bldgs 0.00 5,437.00 Total Depreciation 5,437.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,437.00 0.00 1101-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1101-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total City Council 5,437.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,437.00 0.00 139Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 140 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 City Manager1201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1201-5400 Equipment/Furniture 139,058.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-5403 Vehicles 0.00 139,058.00 Total City Manager 139,058.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 139,058.00 0.00 140Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 141 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Finance Cashier1204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1204-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1204-5400 Equipment/Furniture 492.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 492.00 Total Finance Cashier 492.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 492.00 0.00 141Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 142 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Information Technology1206 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1206-4200 Contract Services 332,383.00 61,652.41 61,652.41 18.551206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 270,730.59 Total Contract Services 332,383.00 61,652.41 61,652.41 0.00 270,730.59 18.55 1206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3,232.00 5.92 5.92 0.181206-4304 Telephone 0.00 3,226.08 17,000.00 1,235.56 1,235.56 7.271206-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 15,764.44 108.00 9.00 9.00 8.331206-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 99.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 20,340.00 1,250.48 1,250.48 0.00 19,089.52 6.15 1206-4900 Depreciation 49,861.00 0.00 0.00 0.001206-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 49,861.00 Total Depreciation 49,861.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,861.00 0.00 1206-5400 Equipment/Furniture 1,300.00 5,560.18 5,560.18 427.711206-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 -4,260.18 7,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.001206-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 7,200.00 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001206-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 15,000.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 23,500.00 5,560.18 5,560.18 0.00 17,939.82 23.66 Total Information Technology 426,084.00 68,463.07 68,463.07 0.00 357,620.93 16.07 142Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 143 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 General Appropriations1208 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1208-4200 Contract Services 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 9,000.00 Total Contract Services 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 1208-4900 Depreciation 6,956.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 6,956.00 Total Depreciation 6,956.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,956.00 0.00 1208-5400 Equipment/Furniture 29,056.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 29,056.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 29,056.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,056.00 0.00 Total General Appropriations 45,012.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45,012.00 0.00 143Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 144 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Police2101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2101-4200 Contract Services 37,566.00 22,739.00 22,739.00 60.532101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 14,827.00 Total Contract Services 37,566.00 22,739.00 22,739.00 0.00 14,827.00 60.53 2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 81,402.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 81,402.00 52,000.00 -145.80 -145.80 0.282101-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 52,145.80 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 133,402.00 -145.80 -145.80 0.00 133,547.80 0.00 2101-4900 Depreciation 82,821.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 82,821.00 125,932.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 125,932.00 Total Depreciation 208,753.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 208,753.00 0.00 2101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 6,587.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 6,587.00 39,303.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 39,303.00 61,489.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 61,489.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 107,379.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 107,379.00 0.00 2101-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Police 487,100.00 22,593.20 22,593.20 0.00 464,506.80 4.64 144Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 145 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Fire2201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2201-4200 Contract Services 30,840.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 30,840.00 Total Contract Services 30,840.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,840.00 0.00 2201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 20,847.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 20,847.00 14,858.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 14,858.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 35,705.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,705.00 0.00 2201-4900 Depreciation 5,291.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 5,291.00 115,717.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 115,717.00 Total Depreciation 121,008.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121,008.00 0.00 2201-5400 Equipment/Furniture 181,915.00 0.00 0.00 0.002201-5403 Vehicles 0.00 181,915.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 181,915.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 181,915.00 0.00 Total Fire 369,468.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 369,468.00 0.00 145Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 146 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians2601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2601-4200 Contract Services 5,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 5,400.00 Total Contract Services 5,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,400.00 0.00 2601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 6,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 6,700.00 1,300.00 61.03 61.03 4.692601-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,238.97 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 8,000.00 61.03 61.03 0.00 7,938.97 0.76 2601-4900 Depreciation 33.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 33.00 14,612.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 14,612.00 Total Depreciation 14,645.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,645.00 0.00 2601-5400 Equipment/Furniture 46,633.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-5403 Vehicles 0.00 46,633.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 46,633.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46,633.00 0.00 Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 74,678.00 61.03 61.03 0.00 74,616.97 0.08 146Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 147 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Sewers/Storm Drains3102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3102-4200 Contract Services 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 5,000.00 Total Contract Services 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 3102-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 1,000.00 5,825.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 5,825.00 2,384.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 2,384.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 9,209.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,209.00 0.00 3102-4900 Depreciation 2,066.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 2,066.00 30,970.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 30,970.00 Total Depreciation 33,036.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,036.00 0.00 3102-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Sewers/Storm Drains 47,245.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47,245.00 0.00 147Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 148 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Street Maint/Traffic Safety3104 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 9,520.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 9,520.00 2,977.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 2,977.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 12,497.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,497.00 0.00 3104-4900 Depreciation 4,968.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 4,968.00 14,882.00 0.00 0.00 0.003104-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 14,882.00 Total Depreciation 19,850.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,850.00 0.00 3104-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Street Maint/Traffic Safety 32,347.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32,347.00 0.00 148Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 149 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Storm Drains3109 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3109-4200 Contract Services 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 5,000.00 Total Contract Services 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 3109-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 600.00 3,495.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 3,495.00 1,430.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,430.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 5,525.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,525.00 0.00 3109-4900 Depreciation 23,397.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 23,397.00 Total Depreciation 23,397.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,397.00 0.00 3109-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Storm Drains 33,922.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,922.00 0.00 149Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 150 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Community Services3302 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3302-4200 Contract Services 6,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 6,450.00 Total Contract Services 6,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,450.00 0.00 3302-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 22,592.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 22,592.00 8,000.00 271.07 271.07 3.393302-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 7,728.93 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 30,592.00 271.07 271.07 0.00 30,320.93 0.89 3302-4900 Depreciation 12,557.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 12,557.00 25,601.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 25,601.00 Total Depreciation 38,158.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,158.00 0.00 3302-5400 Equipment/Furniture 1,359.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 1,359.00 40,920.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 40,920.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 42,279.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42,279.00 0.00 Total Community Services 117,479.00 271.07 271.07 0.00 117,207.93 0.23 150Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 151 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Community Dev/Building4201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4201-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 300.00 838.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 838.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1,138.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,138.00 0.00 4201-4900 Depreciation 1,109.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 1,109.00 Total Depreciation 1,109.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,109.00 0.00 4201-5400 Equipment/Furniture 7,754.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 7,754.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 7,754.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,754.00 0.00 Total Community Dev/Building 10,001.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,001.00 0.00 151Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 152 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4200 Contract Services 530.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 530.00 Total Contract Services 530.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 530.00 0.00 4202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3,795.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 3,795.00 7,904.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 7,904.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 11,699.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,699.00 0.00 4202-4900 Depreciation 10,618.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 10,618.00 3,757.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 3,757.00 Total Depreciation 14,375.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,375.00 0.00 4202-5400 Equipment/Furniture 22,361.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 22,361.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 22,361.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,361.00 0.00 Total Public Works Administration 48,965.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,965.00 0.00 152Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 153 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Building Maintenance4204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4204-4200 Contract Services 54,000.00 175.60 175.60 0.334204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 53,824.40 Total Contract Services 54,000.00 175.60 175.60 0.00 53,824.40 0.33 4204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 690.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 690.00 4,047.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 4,047.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4,737.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,737.00 0.00 4204-4900 Depreciation 5,151.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 5,151.00 1,739.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 1,739.00 455.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4904 Depreciation/Improvements 0.00 455.00 Total Depreciation 7,345.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,345.00 0.00 4204-5400 Equipment/Furniture 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 4,500.00 46,633.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-5403 Vehicles 0.00 46,633.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 51,133.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51,133.00 0.00 4204-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Building Maintenance 117,215.00 175.60 175.60 0.00 117,039.40 0.15 153Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 154 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Equipment Service4206 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4206-4100 Personal Services 138,583.00 6,868.82 6,868.82 4.964206-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 131,714.18 3,000.00 652.00 652.00 21.734206-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 2,348.00 5,871.00 0.00 0.00 0.004206-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 5,871.00 23,999.00 467.94 467.94 1.954206-4180 Retirement 0.00 23,531.06 39,880.00 3,210.64 3,210.64 8.054206-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 36,669.36 2,017.00 109.81 109.81 5.444206-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 1,907.19 10,836.00 0.00 0.00 0.004206-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 10,836.00 Total Personal Services 224,186.00 11,309.21 11,309.21 0.00 212,876.79 5.04 4206-4200 Contract Services 6,900.00 224.00 224.00 3.254206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 6,676.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.004206-4251 Contract Services/Govt 0.00 500.00 Total Contract Services 7,400.00 224.00 224.00 0.00 7,176.00 3.03 4206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3,500.00 28.29 28.29 0.814206-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 3,471.71 2,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.004206-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 2,300.00 1,300.00 18.51 18.51 1.424206-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,281.49 35,427.00 2,952.00 2,952.00 8.334206-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 32,475.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 42,527.00 2,998.80 2,998.80 0.00 39,528.20 7.05 4206-4900 Depreciation 308.00 0.00 0.00 0.004206-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 308.00 Total Depreciation 308.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 308.00 0.00 4206-5400 Equipment/Furniture 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004206-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 20,000.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 Total Equipment Service 294,421.00 14,532.01 14,532.01 0.00 279,888.99 4.94 154Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 155 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Community Resources4601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4601-4200 Contract Services 780.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 780.00 Total Contract Services 780.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 780.00 0.00 4601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 2,200.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 500.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,700.00 0.00 4601-4900 Depreciation 2,138.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 2,138.00 Total Depreciation 2,138.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,138.00 0.00 4601-5400 Equipment/Furniture 436.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 436.00 61,497.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-5403 Vehicles 0.00 61,497.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 61,933.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61,933.00 0.00 Total Community Resources 67,551.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67,551.00 0.00 155Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 156 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Parks6101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 4,000.00 1,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,300.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 5,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,300.00 0.00 6101-4900 Depreciation 6,839.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 6,839.00 Total Depreciation 6,839.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,839.00 0.00 6101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 46,633.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-5403 Vehicles 0.00 46,633.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 46,633.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46,633.00 0.00 Total Parks 58,772.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58,772.00 0.00 156Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 157 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 South Park Playground Improvements8537 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8537-4200 Contract Services 51,036.00 0.00 0.00 0.008537-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 51,036.00 Total South Park Playground Improvements 51,036.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51,036.00 0.00 157Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 158 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Fire Station Renovations & Upgrades8607 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8607-4200 Contract Services 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008607-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 20,000.00 Total Fire Station Renovations & Upgrades 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 158Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 159 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Citywide Energy Conservation Upgrades8656 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8656-4200 Contract Services 317,156.00 0.00 0.00 0.008656-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 317,156.00 Total Citywide Energy Conservation Upgrades 317,156.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 317,156.00 0.00 Total Equipment Replacement Fund 2,763,439.00 106,095.98 106,095.98 0.00 2,657,343.02 3.84 159Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 160 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Gen Fixed Assets Account Group905 Sale Of Fixed Assets1291 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1291-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Sale Of Fixed Assets 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 160Page: 09/17/2015 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 161 8:59AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2015 through 7/31/2015 Periods: 1 through 1 Gen Fixed Assets Account Group905 Infrastructure Purchases4209 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4209-9000 Infrastructure Total Infrastructure 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4209-9100 *** Title Not Found *** Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4209-9200 *** Title Not Found *** Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4209-9300 *** Title Not Found *** Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4209-9400 *** Title Not Found *** Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4209-9500 *** Title Not Found *** Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4209-9700 *** Title Not Found *** Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4209-9900 *** Title Not Found *** Total Gen Fixed Assets Account Group 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grand Total 53,662,116.00 3,722,757.79 3,722,757.79 6.94 0.00 49,939,358.21 161Page: Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0672 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Recommended Action: To receive and file the July, 2015 Treasurer’s Report and Cash Balance Report. Summary: Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach’s adopted investment policy. Attached is a report of all inactive Public Deposits for the month of July,2015.This is the most current available investment information. Attachments: 1.City Treasurer’s Report 2.Cash Balance Report Respectfully Submitted by: Karen Nowicki, City Treasurer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Concur: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ TREASURER'S REPORT JULY 2015 INSTITUTIONS RATE YELD DATE OF DATE OF ORIGINAL MARKET *COST/MARKET FACE/PAR OF TO %WEIGHTED INVESTMENT TYPE/INSTITUTION CUSIP #BOOK VALUE INVESTMENT MATURITY COST VALUE DIFFERENCE VALUE INTEREST MATURITY TOTAL YIELD POOLED INVESTMENTS LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund)$2,233,696.61 $2,233,696.61 0.320%6.357% LACPIF (Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Funds)$28,744,495.59 $28,744,495.59 0.740%81.811% Pooled Investments % of Total Investment 88.169%$30,978,192.20 CORPORATE NOTES General Electric Capital Corporation 36962G6R0 $500,000.00 8/16/2013 1/8/2016 $500,452.78 $501,000.00 $547.22 $500,000.00 1.000%1.000%1.423%1.423% Corporate Notes % of Total Investment 1.423%$500,000.00 AGENCIES Federal Home Loan Mortgage 3137EADK2 $489,832.20 8/1/2014 8/1/2019 $487,250.00 $495,620.00 $8,370.00 $500,000.00 1.250%1.785%1.394%2.488% Agencies % of Total Investment 1.394%$489,832.20 NEGOTIABLE CDS BMW Bank of Northern America 05568PW29 $248,000.00 4/13/2012 4/13/2016 $247,032.80 $249,257.46 $2,224.66 $248,000.00 1.250%1.350%0.706%0.953% Goldman Sachs Bank 38143AQB4 $247,000.00 4/18/2012 4/18/2017 $247,000.00 $251,280.87 $4,280.87 $247,000.00 1.850%1.850%0.703%1.301% Banco Bilbao 059457UM1 $248,817.96 4/20/2012 4/20/2016 $248,004.00 $250,389.47 $2,385.47 $249,000.00 1.300%1.403%0.708%0.993% Cit Bank 17284AYT9 $193,230.00 7/29/2013 9/21/2015 $194,312.74 $190,389.32 ($3,923.42)$193,230.00 0.800%0.800%0.550%0.440% Farmers and Merchants 308862DA6 $248,000.00 9/20/2013 9/20/2016 $248,000.00 $248,754.90 $754.90 $248,000.00 1.000%1.000%0.706%0.706% First Merchant Bank 32082BCY3 $248,000.00 3/21/2014 9/21/2017 $248,000.00 $248,355.74 $355.74 $248,000.00 1.000%1.000%0.706%0.706% Ally Bank 02006LEH2 $248,000.00 5/7/2014 5/8/2017 $248,000.00 $249,057.84 $1,057.84 $248,000.00 1.100%1.100%0.706%0.777% Sallie Mae Bank 795450UB9 $248,000.00 10/22/2014 10/22/2019 $248,000.00 $254,583.68 $6,583.68 $248,000.00 2.150%2.150%0.706%1.518% American Express Bank 02587CCC2 $247,000.00 10/23/2014 10/23/2019 $247,000.00 $254,072.51 $7,072.51 $247,000.00 2.200%2.200%0.703%1.547% Peoples UTD Bank 71270QLM6 $247,000.00 1/21/2015 1/21/2020 $247,000.00 $250,127.80 $3,127.80 $247,000.00 1.850%1.850%0.703%1.301% Private Bank and Trust 74267GUU9 $248,000.00 1/23/2015 1/23/2020 $248,000.00 $251,686.58 $3,686.58 $248,000.00 1.900%1.900%0.706%1.341% Discover Bank 254672QE1 $248,000.00 6/17/2015 6/17/2020 $248,000.00 $253,306.42 $5,306.42 $248,000.00 2.100%2.100%0.706%1.483% Capital One Bank 140420SH4 $248,000.00 6/17/2015 6/17/2020 $248,000.00 $253,893.76 $5,893.76 $248,000.00 2.150%2.150%0.706%1.518% Negotiable CD % of Total Investment 9.014%$3,167,047.96 100.000% TOTAL ALL INVESTMENTS $35,135,072.36 $4,154,052.32 $4,201,776.35 $47,724.03 $35,145,422.20 Average Rate of Interest 1.409% Average Yield to Maturity 1.576% In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, the Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby certifies that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months.Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. APPROVED: KAREN NOWICKI, CITY TREASURER CASH BALANCE REPORT JULY 2015 GENERAL ACCOUNT FUND 7/1/2015 7/31/2015 NUMBER FUND NAME BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENTS CHECKS ADJUSTMENTS BALANCE 001 GENERAL $14,690,603.77 $1,977,524.73 $273,341.01 ($2,677,361.83)($983,852.38)$13,280,255.30 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING $65,452.22 $5,801.60 $2,335.83 ($39,235.58)(7,790.85)$26,563.22 115 STATE GAS TAX $277,008.38 $53,900.91 ($26,333.00)$304,576.29 117 AB939 $940.80 $3,776.76 $37,984.80 ($5,789.74)(573.35)$36,339.27 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE ($127,159.02)(1,713.00)($128,872.02) 122 TYCO $659,008.29 $39,855.64 $40,789.37 (64,023.50)$675,629.80 123 TYCO TIDELANDS $2,562.65 $3.62 $2,566.27 125 PARK REC FAC TAX $544,129.36 $765.83 (67,605.28)$477,289.91 135 BAYVIEW DRIVE DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $1,353.07 $1.85 (759.75)(239.00)$356.17 136 LOWER PIER DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $4,183.44 (301.12)(187.00)$3,695.32 137 MYRTLE DRIVE DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $12,544.53 $17.55 (479.82)(439.00)$11,643.26 138 LOMA DRIVE DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $18,285.58 $25.62 (476.00)$17,835.20 139 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT ADMIN EXPENSE $2,523.68 $3.51 (339.61)(158.00)$2,029.58 145 PROPOSITION A $766,500.74 $48,794.48 $1,085.64 (12,817.12)(24,137.13)$779,426.61 146 PROPOSITION C $768,855.89 $20,010.80 $1,088.56 (14,649.84)$775,305.41 147 MEASURE R $748,957.65 $14,985.73 $19,022.92 (408.00)$782,558.30 150 GRANTS $55,085.69 $18,232.50 $62,081.93 (65,867.45)$69,532.67 152 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT $29,295.78 $41.46 (170.23)(9.77)$29,157.24 153 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES $28,416.00 $38.42 (41,658.39)($13,203.97) 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE $4,032,115.43 $818.00 $28,468.04 (67,289.51)(1,939.06)$3,992,172.90 161 STORM DRAINS FUND $0.00 $35,317.00 (204.81)(6,771.62)$28,340.57 170 ASSET SEIZURE $194,702.35 $267.40 (129,572.83)$65,396.92 180 FIRE PROTECTION $50,842.42 $7,104.08 $72.41 $58,018.91 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $1,498,513.40 $2,044.31 (97,547.62)(17,961.94)$1,385,048.15 302 ARTESIA BLVD RELINQUISHMENT FUND $5,485.05 $7.70 $5,492.75 609 BAYVIEW DRIVE DISTRICT REDEMPTION $140,069.71 $361.52 $196.46 $140,627.69 610 LOWER PIER DISTRICT REDEMPTION $45,173.30 $1,467.26 $63.43 $46,703.99 611 BEACH DRIVE DISTRICT REDEMPTION $73,585.05 ($125.75)$103.20 $73,562.50 612 BEACH DRIVE DISTRICT RESERVE $4,124.95 $5.79 $4,130.74 617 MYRTLE DRIVE DISTRICT REDEMPTION $128,306.40 $2,403.43 $180.07 $130,889.90 618 LOMA DRIVE DISTRICT REDEMPTION $149,552.51 2050.15 $209.85 $151,812.51 619 BAYVIEW DRIVE DISTRICT RESERVE $13,545.13 $18.99 $13,564.12 705 INSURANCE $10,208,268.05 $75,503.14 $243,954.00 (920,693.46)(736.42)$9,606,295.31 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $5,453,662.01 $131,012.00 (544,381.35)(4,200.73)$5,036,091.93 900 INVESTMENT $0.00 $9,722.31 $51,587.11 (61,309.42)$0.00 TOTAL GENERAL ACCOUNT $40,546,494.26 $2,228,286.38 $986,036.59 ($4,812,466.26)($1,077,518.25)$37,870,832.72 TRUST BALANCE BALANCE ACCOUNTS 7/1/2015 DEPOSITS CHARGES 7/31/2015 PAYROLL $12,688.88 $1,289,988.97 ($1,297,340.96)$5,336.89 CABLE TV DEPOSIT $16,568.95 $16,568.95 $29,257.83 $21,905.84 TOTAL ALL ACCOUNTS $37,892,738.56 $35,135,072.36 BANK BALANCES INVESTMENTS GENERAL $4,386,041.86TRUST ACCOUNTS $24,771.46 $4,410,813.32$896.20 OUTSTANDING CHECKS ($1,653,147.12) INTEREST COLLECTED $2,757,666.20 TO DATE FOR FY 15/16 INVESTMENTS $35,135,072.36 BALANCE $37,892,738.56 APPROVED : KAREN NOWICKI, CITY TREASURER Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0683 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Recommended Action: To approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. Summary: Please ratify the following request for cancellation of the check(s) listed below: # 78408 - 07/09/15 - $617.96 - Smart and Final The check was lost in the mail. A stop payment has been issued. # 78597 - 07/30/15 - $143.75 - Liftline Capital LLC Duplicate payment. The check was voided. Respectfully Submitted by: Karen Nowicki, City Treasurer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Concur: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0691 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 ACTION SHEET OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: To receive and file the action sheet of the Planning Commission meeting of September 15, 2015. Attachments: Action Sheet of September 15, 2015 Approved:Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 1 ACTION SHEET AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 September 15, 2015 7:00 P.M. Michael Flaherty, Chairman Ron Pizer, Vice Chair Peter Hoffman Kent Allen Rob Saemann 1.Pledge of Allegiance 2.Roll Call ALL PRESENT. 3.Oral / Written Communications - Anyone wishing to address the Commission regarding a matter not related to a public hearing on the agenda may do so at this time. Section I Consent Calendar 4. Approval of the August 18, 2015 action minutes ACTION: APPROVED (4-0; COMMISSIONER HOFFMAN ABSTAINED) 5.Resolution(s) for consideration – None Section II Hearing 6.C-36 -- Semi-annual review and report on Conditional Use Permit compliance for on-sale alcoholic beverage establishments City wide. Staff Recommended Action: To conduct the semi-annual review of on-sale alcoholic beverage establishments for January-June 2015 and based on the information and “Standard Initiating P.C. Review” determine that none of the businesses have had sufficient violations to initiate a modification/revocation hearing. ACTION: RECEIVED AND FILED (5-0). Public Hearing 2 7.CON 15-7 / PDP 15-9 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 73629 for a two-unit residential condominium project at 515 Prospect Avenue, and determination whether alternative points at the top of the retaining wall at the rear of the site and an alternative point at the southwest property corner may be used for the purpose of calculating building height; and determine the project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (continued from the August 18, 2015 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To adopt the resolution approving subject Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 73629 for a two unit condominium subject to conditions and determine the project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act. ACTION: ADOPTED RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBJECT REQUESTS WITH MODIFICATION TO CONDITION 5A TO ADD DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS IN ADDITION TO “…TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR” FOR APPROVAL OF LANDSCAPING, AND DETERMINED THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (5-0). This final action is subject to potential review by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 2.52 of the Municipal Code*, or may be appealed to the City Council by any party if filed by October 5, 2015. 8.CON15-8 / PDP15-10 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 73730 for a two-unit residential condominium project at 1085- 1087 Monterey Boulevard, and determination that the project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Staff Recommended Action: To adopt the resolution approving subject Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 73730 for a two unit condominium project subject to conditions and determine the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. ACTION: ADOPTED RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBJECT REQUESTS WITH NOTIFICATION TO APPLICANT THAT PROPER PROCEDURES BE FOLLOWED REGARDING MATURE PALM TREE(S) IN THE PARKWAY, AND DETERMINED THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (5-0). This final action is subject to potential review by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 2.52 of the Municipal Code*, or may be appealed to the City Council by any party if filed by October 5, 2015. 9.CUP15-9 & PARK15-6 -- Conditional Use Permit Amendment to an existing ‘late night’ restaurant with an outdoor patio and on-sale general alcohol at 39 Pier Avenue (Palmilla) with current allowed hours until 1:30 A.M daily, for an approximate 1,100 square foot expansion into the adjacent space to the west (currently a bakery/café); with reduced hours of late night operation until 12:30 A.M. Sunday through Wednesday, and until 1:00 A.M. Thursday, and keeping hours until 1:30 A.M. Friday and Saturday, and a Parking Plan to determine the applicable parking requirements and possible payment of fees in-lieu of providing required parking on site, and determination that the project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Staff Recommended Action: To continue to October 20, 2015 meeting as requested by the applicant. 3 ACTION: CONTINUED TO AN UNSPECIFIED DATE AS REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT AND RE-NOTICE THE PROJECT (5-0). Section III Hearing 10. S-21#21 – Request to determine whether a convex slope condition exists and to allow the use of alternative spot elevations rather than property corner elevations along the north and south property lines for the purposes of determining building height at 648 Loma Drive. Staff Recommended Action: To determine, by minute order, the convexity at the subject property but recommend use of alternative elevations with the exclusion of areas where fill soils are present towards the front and middle of the property. ACTION: DETERMINED, BY MINUTE ORDER, THAT THE CONVEXITY AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BUT RECOMMEND USE OF ALTERNATIVE ELEVATIONS WITH THE EXCLUSION OF AREAS WHERE FILL SOILS ARE PRESENT TOWARDS THE FRONT AND MIDDLE OF THE PROPERTY (4-0, COMMISSIONER HOFFMAN RECUSED). This action is not appealable by applicant or public; however, it may be reviewed by City Council pursuant to Chapter 2.52 of the Municipal Code*. 11. S-21#22 -- Request to determine whether a convex slope condition exists and to allow the use of alternative spot elevations rather than property corner elevations along the north and south property lines for the purposes of determining building height at 650 Loma Drive. Staff Recommended Action: To determine, by minute order, the convexity at the subject property but recommend use of alternative elevations with the exclusion of areas where fill soils are present towards the front and middle of the property. ACTION: DETERMINED, BY MINUTE ORDER, THAT THE CONVEXITY AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BUT RECOMMEND USE OF ALTERNATIVE ELEVATIONS WITH THE EXCLUSION OF AREAS WHERE FILL SOILS ARE PRESENT TOWARDS THE FRONT AND MIDDLE OF THE PROPERTY (4-0, COMMISSIONER HOFFMAN RECUSED). This action is not appealable by applicant or public; however, it may be reviewed by City Council pursuant to Chapter 2.52 of the Municipal Code*. 12. D-21#23 -- Request to determine whether a convex slope condition exists and to allow the use of alternative spot elevations rather than property corner elevations along the north and south property lines for the purposes of determining building height at 626 Loma Drive. Staff Recommended Action: To determine, by minute order, the convexity at the subject property but recommend use of alternative elevations with the exclusion of areas where fill soils are present towards the front and middle of the property. ACTION: DETERMINED, BY MINUTE ORDER, THAT THE CONVEXITY AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BUT RECOMMEND USE OF ALTERNATIVE ELEVATIONS WITH THE EXCLUSION OF AREAS WHERE FILL SOILS ARE PRESENT TOWARDS THE FRONT AND MIDDLE OF THE PROPERTY (4-0, COMMISSIONER HOFFMAN RECUSED). This action is not appealable by applicant or public; however, it may be reviewed by City Council pursuant to Chapter 2.52 of the Municipal Code*. Section IV 4 13. Staff Items a.Direction regarding Text Amendment to implement the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy. b.Direction regarding the City’s noticing procedures for Planning Commission meetings. ACTION: THE PLANNING COMMISSION PROVIDED INPUT FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION. c.Report on wireless communications facility for AT&T (relocation of the existing facility at 29th Court to the Kiwanis building located at 2515 Valley Drive). d.Memorandum regarding rotation of Planning Commission Chair and Vice Chair. ACTION: COMMISSIONERS PIZER AND HOFFMAN TO BE THE NEXT CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIR TO SERVE FROM OCTOBER, 2015 THROUGH JUNE, 2016. e.Report on City Council actions. f.Report on comprehensive planning processes. g.Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. h.Community Development Department activity report of July, 2015. 14. Commissioner Items 15. Adjournment *Chapter 2.52, Section 2.52.040 of the Municipal Code provides for Council review and reconsideration of any decision of the Planning Commission by two affirmative votes at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting. In the event the Council initiates a review, the review will be placed on a future agenda of City Council within a reasonable time period, and the Commission’s decision is stayed pending Council’s review and final decision. Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0649 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $296,530 WITH AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TO PROVIDE PLANNING SERVICES FOR THE STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT PROPOSED BY BOLOUR ASSOCIATES (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: Approve a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $296,530 with Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. to prepare an Environmental Impact Report and to provide planning services for the Strand and Pier Hotel Project proposed by Bolour Associates. Background: In response to the application for the Strand and Pier Hotel Project by Bolour Associates, a Request for Proposals (RFP) to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and provide planning services was circulated on September 4, 2014 to qualified firms and posted online. On September 16, 2014, staff hosted a pre-proposal meeting in the City Council chambers to answer questions from consultants and to provide background information. Analysis: The City received nine proposals from First Carbon Solutions, CAJA, PlaceWorks, AECOM, RBF, LSA, Rincon, PCR and Amec, as well as a proposal from PMC to provide only planning services. Community Development and Public Works staff interviewed RBF, Rincon, PCR and Amec based on selection criteria in the RFP emphasizing the consultants’ relevant experience and expertise, proposed approach and methods, understanding of issues and challenges, and administrative issues. As a result of this process, the committee selected Amec as the preferred consultant to perform the work. Although firms were qualified, Amec exhibited a high level of hotel and coastal permitting experience relating to both EIR and planning services; technical expertise required to evaluate anticipated issues; understanding of planning, coordination and meeting resources that will be necessary for this project in a highly engaged community given location, level of controversy and complexity, and comparable hourly rates. Subsequent to the committee’s evaluation, the developer performed initial public outreach, and in response to feedback received from the community, substantially revised the concepts for the Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0649 proposed hotel project. The selected EIR consultant therefore modified their Professional Services proposal accordingly. The proposed contract amount is $296,530. The scope of work and budget is provided as Exhibit A to the proposed Professional Services Agreement. All contract costs are paid to the City by the applicant by means of a Reimbursement Agreement between the City and the applicant, so there is no cost to the City. In addition, the Reimbursement Agreement requires an additional 10% of the EIR consultant contract for the City’s administrative costs, reimbursement for staff augmentation for engineering services, reimbursement for planning staff services, and reimbursement for legal expenses. Fiscal Implications: None Attachments: 1.Professional Services Agreement, including Scope of Work and Budget 2. Proposal to Prepare EIR for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project (Exhibit A) Respectfully Submitted by: Kim Chafin, Senior Planner Concur: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ 1 Attachment 1 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TO PROVIDE PLANNING SERVICES FOR THE PROPOSED STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT This AGREEMENT is entered into this ____ day of __________, 2015, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a general law city and municipal corporation (“CITY”) and Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc., (“CONSULTANT”). R E C I T A L S A.The City desires to prepare an environmental impact report prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines to assess the potential environmental impacts of a proposed Hotel Project with ancillary commercial development, facilities and amenities related to the environmental review process as required by law and to provide planning services related to project processing as required by State law and the Municipal Code. B.The City does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the services required under this agreement and therefore, the City desires to contract for consulting services to accomplish this work. C.The Consultant warrants to the City that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement. D.The City desires to contract with the Consultant to perform the services as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, the City and the Consultant agree as follows: 1.CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION A.As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as Exhibit A. B.As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. C.As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a not to exceed cost of $296,530, plus ten percent contingency, for 2 CONSULTANT’s services, based on hourly rates and estimated expenses identified in Attachment A, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement. City Manager is authorized to allow an additional amount not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the total estimated amount under this Agreement. D.No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the Community Development Director or his/her designee. E.CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices to CITY. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT all uncontested amounts set forth in CONSULTANT’s invoice within 30 days after it is received. 2.SCOPE OF SERVICES. A.CONSULTANT will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE OF SERVICE attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. B.Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement. 3.PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the person and time expended by major task, a description of the specific tasks performed during the invoice period, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period in accordance with the schedule of compensation incorporated in “Exhibit A.” 4.TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of the CONTRACTOR are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from the CITY and shall continue until all authorized work is completed to the CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in “Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing by the CITY. 5.FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. 3 6.KEY PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT’s key persons assigned to perform work under this Agreement are Dan Gira, Erika Leachment, Doug McFarling and Rita Bright. CONSULTANT shall not assign other persons to be in charge of the work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the City. 7.TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on December 31, 2016, unless earlier termination occurs under Section 11 of this Agreement, or this Agreement is extended in writing in advance by both parties. 8.CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties. 9.TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 10.PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. 11.TERMINATION. A.Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing. B.CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 60 days before the effective termination date. C.In the event of such termination, the CONTRACTOR shall cease services as of the date of termination, and all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property, and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination. D.Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated. 12.INDEMNIFICATION. A.CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by CITY, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers 4 from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, and cost (including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or resulting from CONSULTANT's negligent or wrongful performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT, regardless of CITY’S passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage which is caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY. Should CITY in its sole discretion find CONSULTANT’S legal counsel unacceptable, then CONSULTANT shall reimburse the CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. The CONSULTANT shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement. B.The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONSULTANT as required by Section 17, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification. 13.ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT’s professional services. CONSULTANT’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s written approval are prohibited and will be null and void. 14.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as it relates to the end results of the work only. 15.AUDIT OF RECORDS. A.CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or designee, 5 access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement. B.CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement. C.CONSULTANT shall comply with all reporting and financial provisions of the Strategic Growth Council’s Sustainable Communities Grant Program as required by the City. 16.CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement. CONSULTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by the City to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective measures shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement. 17.INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. A.The CONSULTANT, at the CONSULTANT’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies: 1.Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. The Consultant shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by the CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the CONTRACTOR for City. 2.General Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general 6 aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. 3.Automobile Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the CONSULTANT arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. 4.Professional Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from the CONSULTANT’S operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by the CONSULTANT or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit-per-occurrence basis. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect. B.Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional liability insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California, or which is approved in writing by City, and shall be endorsed as follows. CONSULTANT also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 1.“The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.” 2.This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the CITY, including any self-insured retention the CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute to this policy. 7 3.This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. 4.The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents. 5.Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. 6.The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the CITY. C.CONSULTANT agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against Contractor arising out of the work performed under this agreement. CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY. D.Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. At the CITY’s option, the CONSULTANT shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self- insured retentions. E.The CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to the CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement. F.Failure on the part of the CONSULTANT to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which the CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11 above. G.The commercial general and automobile liability policies required by this Agreement shall allow City, as additional insured, to satisfy the self- insured retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the Consultant (as the named insured) should Consultant fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. Consultant understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. 8 Failure by Consultant as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should City pay the SIR or deductible on Consultant’s behalf upon the Consultant’s failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, City may include such amounts as damages in any action against Consultant for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by City due to the breach. 18.USE OF OTHER CONSULTANTS. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY’s prior written approval to use any consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must include approval of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation. Consultants list in Exhibit are deemed approved by City and no additional written authorization is required. 19.FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by the CONSULTANT of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of the CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONSULTANT for anything done, furnished or relating to the CONSULTANT’S work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of the CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by the CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of the CONSULTANT, its employees, sub-consultants and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by the CITY for any defect or error in the work prepared by the Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents. 20.CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the CONSULTANT shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during the City’s review of the Consultant’s report or plans. Should the Consultant fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by the CITY, and the cost thereof shall be charged to the CONSULTANT. In addition to all other available remedies, the City may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by the City or may withhold payment otherwise owed CONSULTANT under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction. 21.NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONSULTANT by CITY for services preformed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of CONSULTANT’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement shall cover payment for CONSULTANT’S services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year. 9 22.NOTICES. All communications pertaining to this Agreement to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and mailing or email address as follows and receipt of communication is acknowledged in writing or by email: CITY CONSULTANT City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Dept. 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ATTN: Ken Robertson, Director krobertson@hermosabch.org Amec Foster Wheeler 104 W. Anapamu Street, #204A Santa Barbara, CA 93101 ATTN: Dan Gira, Project Mgr. dan.gira@amec.com Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. 23.SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability. 24.THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT’s or CITY’s obligations under this Agreement. 25.INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County. 26.ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. 27.RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party. 28.AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be 10 modified by written amendment with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY. 29.ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Contract, agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission or scanned and delivered via electronic mail. Such facsimile or electronic mail copies will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. 30.FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other. 31.TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be provided. 32.ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled. 33.STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency. 34.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. It is understood and agreed that the City shall own all documents and other work product of the Consultant, except the Consultant’s notes and workpapers, which pertain to the work performed under this Agreement. The City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion and without further compensation to the Consultant, but any re-use of such documents by the City on any other project without prior written consent of the Consultant shall be at the sole risk of the City. Documents belonging to the City shall be transmitted to the City immediately and without delay upon any termination of this Agreement. 11 35.DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (City and Consultant initials required at one of the following paragraphs) By their respective initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is a “consultant” for the purposes of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties would require him or her to make one or more of the governmental decisions set forth in Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation 18701(a)(2) or otherwise serves in a staff capacity for which disclosure would otherwise be required were Consultant employed by the City. Consultant hereby acknowledges his or her assuming-office, annual, and leaving- office financial reporting obligations under the California Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code and agrees to comply with those obligations at his or her expense. Prior to consultant commencing services hereunder, the City’s Manager shall prepare and deliver to consultant a memorandum detailing the extent of Consultant’s disclosure obligations in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials ______ Consultant Initials ______ OR By their initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is not a “consultant” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of consultant in Fair Political Practice Commission Regulation 18701(a)(2)(A) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials ______ Consultant Initials ______ 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT MAYOR By: ATTEST: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk Taxpayer ID No. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Jenkins, City Attorney Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Prepared for: City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Prepared by: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 104 West Anapamu Street, Suite 204A Santa Barbara, CA 93101 805.962.0992 | 805.966.1706 (fax) This Page Intentionally Left Blank Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project Table of Content I. Cover Letter ......................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Project Approach ................................................................................................................................ 3 Approach to the Pier and Strand Hotel Project EIR .................................................................................. 4 CEQA Analysis Methodology .................................................................................................................... 5 General Description of EIR Components............................................................................................................... 5 Project Understanding ............................................................................................................................... 9 Project Location ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Existing Setting .................................................................................................................................................... 11 Project Description .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Scope of Environment Review Services ................................................................................................. 16 Proposed Approach to Key EIR Prepartion Tasks ............................................................................................... 16 Proposed Scope of Environmental Impact Analysis ............................................................................................ 25 CEQA Project Management Approach ................................................................................................... 40 III. Proposed Schedule .......................................................................................................................... 42 IV. Proposed Cost Summary ................................................................................................................. 44 V. Project Team Qualifications ............................................................................................................. 48 Project Management Team Members ..................................................................................................... 53 Dan Gira - Project Manager ................................................................................................................................. 53 Erika Leachman – Deputy Project Manager ........................................................................................................ 54 Doug McFarling – QA/QC.................................................................................................................................... 55 Rita Bright – Planning and Permit Assistance Manager ...................................................................................... 55 Subconsultant Technical Team Members ............................................................................................... 56 Fehr & Peers – Transportation Engineers ........................................................................................................... 56 Applied EarthWorks – Cultural and Historic Resources Specialists .................................................................... 57 Vizf/x.................................................................................................................................................................... 58 VI. Company Profile ............................................................................................................................... 59 VII. Relevant Project Experience Statement ......................................................................................... 59 Examples of Hotel & Urban Infill Development Projects ......................................................................... 60 Examples of Planning and Permit Assistance Projects .......................................................................... 64 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. ii Statement Regarding Legal Challenges ................................................................................................. 66 VIII. References ......................................................................................................................................... 68 IX. Project Assumptions and Contracting ........................................................................................... 69 Proposal Cost Assumptions ................................................................................................................................ 69 I. COVER LETTER August 5, 2015 Mr. Ken Robertson, Director Community Development Department City of Hermosa Beach 1313 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Subject: Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project Dear Mr. Robertson: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (Amec Foster Wheeler) is pleased to present our revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project in the City of Hermosa Beach (City) based on recent activities and modifications to the project description through July 2015. We are excited about this opportunity to assist the City with comprehensive assessment of the impacts associated with this proposed project in the heart of the City’s beachfront commercial district. We have brought together an outstanding team of professionals with directly relevant experience for this type of project. Our team has hands-on experience working on hotels and infill development in coastal settings and in sensitive locations, such as the Cities of Santa Monica, Malibu, and San Luis Obispo, including recent successful completion of the 5th Street and Colorado Avenue Hotel Projects EIR for the City of Santa Monica. Highlights of our team’s capabilities, strengths, and approach include: A project manager with substantial experience preparing EIRs for multiple-story hotel and infill development projects, including those in coastal communities and within historic downtowns. A deputy project manager deeply familiar with issues surrounding infill development and proven ability to coordinate with agency staff and the project team to aid in efficient and timely completion of the EIR. Subconsultants with substantial experience working with Amec Foster Wheeler on similar or equally complex projects, including Fehr & Peers, Applied EarthWorks, and VIZf/x. A firm committed to working as an extension of City staff to meet the City’s goals, scope, and schedule and produce a thorough and accessible EIR within the submitted project budget. Adjustments in budget and scope with associated cost savings that reflect a somewhat less complex permit process due to changes in the project description (e.g., no vote required), which allows for a reduced number of meetings and a more focused effort for planning and permit assistance; adjustments City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 2 to scope have resulted in $5,125 in savings from Amec Foster Wheeler, $7,145 in savings from Fehr & Peers, and additional savings from related changes to expenses and overhead costs. We hope that this proposal demonstrates our understanding of the City’s needs and our record of producing high quality EIRs for similar projects in communities with an active and informed citizenry. Our proposal responds to the preliminary scope of work and criteria outlined in the City’s Request for Proposal (RFP) and City Council Staff Report 15-0554 (7/8/2015) to include relevant information regarding our understanding of the project; a proposed work plan, budget, schedule; a proposed project team and qualifications; relevant project experience; and client references. Our team has prepared a level-of effort-proposal to provide a detailed description of the level of effort– by task, and within each phase of the project. This proposal is an offer for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of submittal. No member of the contractor’s team has a financial gain or an interest in the financial outcome of the project. We believe our resources and qualifications will allow us to successfully complete this project, and we will commit all necessary staff and resources to the performance of this work within the project schedule. Our team is based in the Santa Barbara office at 104 West Anapamu Street, 204A, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, phone: (805) 962-0992. Should you have additional questions or need clarification on the attached scope of work, please feel free to contact Mr. Dan Gira in Amec Foster Wheeler’s Santa Barbara office at (805) 962- 0992 x225 or daniel.gira@amecfw.com. Please consider me a point of contact for contractual matters. Either Mr. Gira or I are authorized to represent the firm in discussions regarding this proposal. We look forward to working with you. Respectfully Submitted, Aaron P. Goldschmidt Vice President Environmental Planning and Natural Resources Program Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 104 West Anapamu Street, Suite 204A Santa Barbara, CA 93101 City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 3 II. PROJECT APPROACH Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (Amec Foster Wheeler) is pleased to submit this proposal in response to the RFP for the preparation of an EIR for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project, issued by the City of Hermosa Beach (City) on September 4, 2104. We have assembled a strong team led by a project manager with substantial experience assessing complex hotel and urban infill projects, including recent EIRs for projects in the Cities of Santa Monica, Malibu and San Luis Obispo. Our team is familiar with transportation, mobility, and parking concerns in coastal areas and downtowns, historic resources, community character/aesthetics, construction and neighborhood effects, public services and infrastructure constraints analysis, and coastal planning and permitting issues. Our proposal offers the City a cohesive team with recent substantial experience working together on multiple urban infill development and coastal planning projects. Our team includes three subcontractors experienced working with Amec Foster Wheeler to address technical resource areas: Fehr & Peers, a transportation engineering firm with experience with transportation issues in the City; Applied EarthWorks, a cultural resources firm with qualified cultural resource specialists and architectural historians experience with urban infill development; and VIZf/x, an architectural firm with experience preparing photosimulations and modeling shade and shadow effects for Amec Foster Wheeler-prepared EIRs. This section details our proposed approach to management of the Pier and Strand Hotel Project EIR to ensure timely completion of tasks and delivery of high quality work products. The proposed EIR would be produced in Amec Foster Wheeler’s Santa Barbara office. Our project manager and deputy project manager are based in Santa Barbara, with technical staff based in the Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, Riverside, and Irvine offices. Amec Foster Wheeler Team Relevant Expertise A proven record of working closely with local agencies on complex planning and development projects. A project manager with substantial experience with EIR preparation for hotels and major urban infill projects. A well-integrated team with hands-on experience working on similar projects. Expertise with transportation analysis, air quality and noise modeling, cultural and historic resources and photosimulation preparation. Planners with substantial experience permitting complex projects in the Coastal Zone, familiarity with the California Coastal Act and Coastal Commission. “As you know, the County has recently awarded consulting contracts to AMEC given the firm’s excellent reputation in the environmental and planning fields…AMEC’s performance on these complex and controversial projects has been extremely effective, timely, and efficient…AMEC’s analyses meet the high quality expectations of the County and involved stakeholders.”” Kevin Drude, Deputy Director, Planning and Development Department, County of Santa Barbara City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 4 APPROACH TO THE PIER AND STRAND HOTEL PROJECT EIR Amec Foster Wheeler’s technical approach to the Pier and Strand Hotel Project EIR involves close coordination throughout the process with City staff and subconsultants to ensure preparation of a thorough, objective, and defensible EIR with appropriately detailed analyses and mitigation measures. We would build upon and peer review applicant-prepared technical studies, utilize any relevant information from the recent E&B Oil Drilling & Production Project EIR, available information developed as part of the ongoing General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan rewrite to ensure efficient analysis of potential project impacts and the integration of such analysis with existing and proposed City planning documents. To the greatest extent feasible, we will utilize existing data provided by the applicant or collected during the preparation of other studies to maximize the efficiency, timeliness, and accuracy of this EIR. We understand that the project applicant will be submitting technical studies that address Historic Resources, Geotechnical Issues, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Drainage and Hydrology Report, a Traffic Report and Parking Analysis, and a Utilities Plan. Amec Foster Wheeler’s team has hands-on experience working together on multiple major infill development projects, including providing detailed peer review of applicant submitted studies, identifying gaps, omissions or weaknesses in such studies, and either identifying requirements for correction or update or providing the updated information as part of our work program. In addition, we recognize that the City has requested additional information and responses to application completeness issues and that the project description or approach may be adjusted during this review period. Amec Foster Wheeler’s management team is experienced with complex projects, including managing an evolving project description as it continues to be refined, particular during the early stages of the EIR process where environmental baseline conditions are established. We worked closely with the staff from the Cities of Ventura and Santa Barbara during development of the Victoria Avenue Corridor Plan and Development Code and the Santa Barbara General Plan, where the environmental document project description, initial analysis, and consideration of alternatives strongly informed and preceded the release of the full public draft corridor/general plans. We would work closely with the City to ensure that the EIR project description and alternative sections reflect the potential evolution of the project through these early stages. Amec Foster Wheeler understands that the project would involve a significant transformation of Pier Plaza and The Strand, two cherished elements of the City’s public spaces. We would ensure that the EIR provides a detailed but accessible analysis of both the adverse and beneficial impacts of such a transformation. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 5 CEQA ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Our team’s general approach to the format and content of the EIR is presented below. Each environmental resource area discussion will include the following subsections: Existing Conditions describes the physical, natural, and human environmental setting that forms the baseline for the analysis of the project’s and alternatives’ impacts. For this project, this will include a description of the project site itself, as well as an update-to-date description of any planned Downtown Core streetscape improvements or other pending development projects (e.g., hotel south of Pier Avenue) per the Downtown Revitalization Strategy. Local, and as appropriate, federal and state requirements for the resource areas are summarized in Regulatory Setting. The thresholds for determining impact significance and the impact analysis methodology are included in Environmental Impacts. The Proposed Project Impacts, Mitigation Measures, and Residual Impacts will subsequently be identified. Each mitigation measure will include a stated condition, along with a mitigation monitoring component (plan requirements, timing, and monitoring responsibility). A statement regarding the impact of the project in conjunction with implementation of other past, present, and probable future projects will be presented in Cumulative Impacts. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EIR COMPONENTS Executive Summary: The EIR would include an Executive Summary with a brief project description, project history, a brief description of impacts found not to be significant, issues of known public controversy, a matrix summarizing impacts and mitigation measures, and discussion of project alternatives. As potentially the most utilized portion of an EIR, we would prepare the Executive Summary in an easily accessible format, which could be reproduced and distributed independently to facilitate public understanding of the project and its potential impacts. Introduction: The Introduction sets the stage for overall project consideration, the EIR’s role in decision- making, the project’s overall purpose and need, and a discussion of potential areas of controversy. This section would also provide a discussion of the status of and relationship to major projects that could affect the proposed project, including the pending General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan rewrite, potential streetscape changes or other improvements identified in the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy (e.g., additional parking garage south of Pier Avenue). Amec Foster Wheeler will work with City staff to develop a clear purpose and need statement for the project in support of clearly defined project objectives; this could draw in part upon the assessment and recommendations of the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy. Drawing upon existing data sources, our team will create a clear discussion of the project’s goals, objectives, and fulfillment of needs, introducing the project’s relationship to adopted and pending plans. This section will also introduce the overall purpose of the EIR, summarize the public review and project approval process, and disclose standards for adequacy of the EIR, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15151. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 6 Environmental Setting: The Environmental Setting will provide an overview of the existing physical setting with a focus on key features and known environmental issues. Our team utilizes photographs, maps, and diagrams to facilitate understanding of the area’s environment, including a description of surrounding land uses along with regional vicinity, project location, and appropriate planning area maps. We will coordinate with City staff to ensure that this baseline accurately reflects known information and conditions. Project Description: The Project Description will contain the project development proposal, project site maps to supplement environmental setting figures, and project history; it may also be useful to describe the link between the Pier and Strand Hotel Project and the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy. Our Project Description will clearly identify project objectives as the foundation for potential project alternatives. We recognize that a clearly defined set of project objectives is central to supporting the alternatives analysis and is thus critical to the EIR’s legal sustainability. This will include providing a background discussion of relevant details of the proposed project, all requested approvals, including development agreements, as well as proposed public improvements, such as the pedestrian plaza connecting 13th Street to The Strand and beachfront areas. This section will also describe in detail all project permits and entitlements through the Coastal Development Approval process by the California Coastal Commission (CCC). Environmental Analysis: The Environmental Analysis sections would describe the existing baseline physical setting for each resource, with a particular focus on any surrounding sensitive receptors, commercial uses, and the public realm, particularly The Strand and Pier Plaza. Relevant federal, state, and local regulatory requirements will be summarized for each resource area in the Regulatory Setting, including any relevant pending General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan policies. Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines will be used to establish the impact significance criteria, along with the City’s existing policy framework, relevant state and federal regulations, and the professional judgment of Amec Foster Wheeler’s team. To the extent relevant and available, the Environmental Analysis will build from the recent analysis and technical reports prepared for the pending General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan rewrite and the E&B Drilling and Oil Production Project EIR, particularly for regional issues (e.g., geology; population and housing). We will identify existing baseline conditions, proposed project impacts, mitigation measures, and subsequent residual impacts, including both direct and indirect impacts. We will ensure that impacts of the development are identified discretely as well as for the whole of the project. Analysis will include local versus regional impacts and short-term versus long-term impacts. Each mitigation measure would include a stated condition, along with a mitigation monitoring component (plan requirements, timing, and monitoring responsibility). Alternatives: Amec Foster Wheeler will work closely with City staff to craft up to four overall alternatives to the proposed project, including the No Project alternative. We will frame the introduction to the Alternatives using material related to proposals for this Downtown Core site and its relationship to the existing City policies, the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy, and any draft materials that have emerged from the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan rewrite to provide a firm basis for identifying alternatives that fit within City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 7 the City’s overarching policy goals for the site. The Alternatives analysis will be important to provide City decision-makers with optional approaches to meeting project objectives, particularly if the environmental analysis discloses one or more significant or unavoidable impacts associated with the project. We would also integrate applicant-prepared parking alternatives into this section and/or the Transportation and Parking analysis. Amec Foster Wheeler will ensure the alternatives analysis is clearly linked to and supported by the identified project objectives and that a reasonable range of alternatives is provided for consideration. In order to provide the City with a firm evidentiary basis for its decision-making, we will also provide a relatively detailed discussion of alternatives considered and discarded from further evaluation, including the screening methods and criteria used in such evaluation. We will clearly set forth the requirements of CEQA Section 15126.6, which governs the type and range of alternatives that should be considered and factors that affect the feasibility of such alternatives (e.g., economic viability, site suitability, availability of infrastructure, etc.). We will coordinate carefully with both City staff and our team of subconsultants on such issues as net increases in PM peak hour traffic congestion, potential visual impacts identified through Amec Foster Wheeler-prepared photosimulations and visual impact analysis, potential historic resource impacts, including those to adjacent properties (e.g., Bijou Theater Building), and project economic viability. Amec Foster Wheeler’s goal will be to work very closely with City staff when formulating project alternatives and to present the alternatives in a manner that permits easy comparison of impacts. Initial potential concept alternatives and related issues addressed may include: No Project: This analysis would briefly describe the impacts and benefits of not constructing or operating the Pier and Strand Hotel Project. These might include avoidance of construction-related impacts, such as noise and dust generation, reduced potential for increases in PM peak hour traffic, short- and long- term noise, and inability to achieve project objectives. Reduced Hotel Project: This analysis would discuss the potential impacts of a reduced project occurring on the site. This alternative would analyze a hotel with a reduction in project size (e.g., number of rooms or support facilities). Although a reduced project alternative could potentially be screened out as infeasible and eliminated from full consideration, a full analysis of such an alternative would provide City decision-makers and the public with ample information on the potential changes or reductions in environmental impacts to fully support informed decision-making. Based on our experience, the omission or failure to consider an alternative which may be of interest to some community organization or individuals and can raise questions regarding lack of full analysis or request for provision of such analysis late in the process. Alternative Uses: The proposed project has the potential to meet key goals identified in the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy to provide for more visitor-serving uses in the Downtown Core, enhanced revenues, and secondary benefits to local businesses. However, alternative uses, such as a mixed use commercial building that provides both revenue and employments opportunities with the Downtown Core, could be evaluated. Assessment of such uses may alter some potential impacts, such as regional peak City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 8 hour trips or changes on parking demand, which may provide the public and decision-makers with information regarding the environmental tradeoffs associated with a different use. Additional Alternative: Amec Foster Wheeler’s team would identify one additional alternative in conjunction with City staff once project details are finalized. This alternative may address a specific issue, such as a different parking scenarios proposed by the applicant or those that addresses demand and City regulations. Alternately, this may include an alternative location within the City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Core (e.g., south of Pier Avenue) which may be capable of meeting key project objectives while avoiding any impacts associated with the hotel or parking structure sites. Cumulative Impacts: Cumulative impacts will be assessed consistent with CEQA Guidelines §15130 based on a list of projects provided by the City. As stated in the Guidelines, the nature of each environmental resource being evaluated and the type and location of the project affect whether it is included in the cumulative analysis. We understand that cumulative construction issues, as well as potential adverse and beneficial impacts related to construction and operation of proposed downtown projects, may be particularly relevant. We will utilize City information to describe cumulative conditions based on the most current policies and guidelines available. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation measures will be developed in coordination with City staff and key responsible agencies for all significant project-specific and cumulative impacts, as appropriate. Mitigation measures may include ongoing programs (e.g., parking or transportation demand management, parks and recreation improvements), site design changes to reduce visual or other impacts, or one time actions such as installation of offsite improvements (e.g., pedestrian amenities, intersections changes). Residual Impacts: After implementation of mitigation measures, residual impacts will be discussed and the level of significance identified. Other CEQA Sections: Other CEQA sections including an introduction, executive summary, summary impact table, the relationship between local short-term uses of the environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity, and growth-inducing impacts will be provided in the EIR. CEQA Guidelines, §15358(b), states that growth-inducing effects analyzed under CEQA must be related to a physical change in the environment. Therefore, the focus of the growth-inducing section will be on the potential for increased development to have adverse or beneficial effects on City services (e.g., police, fire, increased tax revenue, etc.). City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 9 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Amec Foster Wheeler recognizes that thorough knowledge of a project’s objectives, history, geography, community, use, and other factors is critical to successful completion of a project. Our understanding of this project is based on review of the RFP, the City Council Staff Report 15-0554 (7/8/15), applicant-prepared site plans (8/7/14), the City’s 1979 General Plan (and 1994 Land Use Element), 1981 Local Coastal Plan, 2009 Historic Resources Map, Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy (1/2014), City Environmental Information Form (8/7/14), City Planning Application Form (8/1/14), the California Water Service Company 2010 Urban Water Management Plan for Hermosa-Redondo District, the West Basin Municipal Water District 2010 Urban Water Management Plan, City Public Parking Map, the Healthways | Blue Zones Vitality City: Beach Cities Livability Plan (8/2011), recent news articles, other City EIRs, online information on the City’s website, GIS data and aerial photographs, communication with City staff, and initial field reconnaissance of the project site and surrounding areas. PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located on the northwest corner of Pier Avenue and The Strand within the City’s Downtown Core as identified in the 2014 Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy (ROMA Design Group and Economic & Planning Systems, 1/2014). The proposed project would encompass one contiguous site totaling 0.8 acres. The proposed hotel site is located along The Strand and currently supports a small parking lot, the Mermaid Restaurant, Poop Deck Lounge, and Good Stuff Café, and one to two story buildings that support Hermosa Cyclery and the West Bay Apartments. (refer to Figure 1 and Table 1). The proposed hotel site is bordered by the Beach House Hotel located across 13th Street to the north, Pier Avenue to the south, The Strand and Hermosa Pier to west and southwest, and Killer Shrimp Restaurant and City parking Lot B to the east. Hermosa Avenue lies roughly 400 feet to the east. Regional access to the site is via Pacifica Coast Highway/ State Route 1 (PCH) located 0.4 miles to the east and regional arterials such as Aviation/ Artesia Boulevards or Manhattan Beach Boulevard, which provide access to Interstate 405 located approximately four miles inland to the east (Figure 1). The proposed project site (foreground, right) supports several businesses (e.g., Mermaid Restaurant) and occupies 210 feet of frontage on The Strand, a recreational resource that is heavily used by residents and visitors. This location in the heart of the City’s waterfront makes the project of great interest to the public. P F Civic Center U.S. Post Office Hermosa ValleySchool North School Clark Stadium VALLEY PARK South Park Bicentennial Park ArdmorePark CommunityCenterNoblePark GreenwoodPark Hermosa Beach Pier Pier Plaza City-Owned Parking Lot “B”BeachHermosa Valley Greenbe ltHERMOSA AVENUEBEACH DRIVE VALLEY DRIVE 27TH S T R E E T ARDMORE AVENUEAVIATION BOULEVARD PIER AVEN U E 8TH STRE E T 6TH STREE T 5TH STRE E T 10TH STR E E TTHE STRAND16TH STRE E T 16TH STRE E T MONTEREY BOULEVARDMANHATTAN AVENUEHERMOSA AVENUEMONTEREY BOULEVARDPACIFIC COAST HIGHWAYPACIFIC COAST HIGHWAYMANHATTAN AVENUE2ND STREE T 1 PROJECT LOCATION Santa Monica Bay 710 405 405 5 5 10 10 210 210 110 110 ★★ BurbankBurbank ClaremontClaremont ComptonCompton DowneyDowneyInglewoodInglewood LongLongBeachBeach LOS ANGELESLOS ANGELES MontebelloMontebello PasadenaPasadena Rancho PalosRancho PalosVerdesVerdes WhittierWhittier Burbank Claremont Compton DowneyInglewood Hermosa Beach LongBeach LOS ANGELES Montebello Pasadena Rancho PalosVerdes SantaMonica WestlakeVillage Whittier PROJECT LOCATION SOUTHERN LOS ANGELES COUNTY N 015 MILES ● ●● ● CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara San Francisco Sacramento Los AngelesHermosaBeach LEGEND Project Location Downtown Core1 Coastal Zone Boundary Park Public Facilities Library Police Station Fire Station 1From the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy January 2014. P F 0 800 SCALE IN FEET Project Vicinity and Regional Setting N 1 FIGURE City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 11 EXISTING SETTING The project site is located on the western coastal edge area of the City’s Downtown Core, which serves as the commercial heart of the City (Figure 2) The site is adjacent to Pier Plaza and The Strand, a pedestrian- friendly shopping, entertainment, and recreational area. Pier Plaza is a busy palm tree-lined pedestrian- only esplanade roughly 90 feet wide that extends for almost 500 feet from Hermosa Road west to The Strand. The project site lies at the coastal terminus of Pier Plaza, providing direct access to Hermosa Beach and Pier. Existing development in the project vicinity consists of a mix of often older commercial buildings of primarily one to two stories in height, with restaurant and retail uses predominantly adjacent to the project site. Several of the buildings in the project area, such as the Bijou Theater, are historic or potentially historic resources (Figure 2). Land uses along Hermosa Avenue east of the site transition to a range of office and retail commercial businesses in predominantly of one and two story buildings. Pier Avenue extends east from Hermosa Avenue up the hill to PCH located 0.3-mile to the east. Pier Avenue serves as an entry point to the Downtown Core and is developed with on-street angled parking and pedestrian amenities. The intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Pier Avenue is signalized with a pedestrian scramble allowing diagonal crossing to improve pedestrian access to the Downtown Core. Hermosa Avenue is a four- lane local road with a shared bike lane, landscaped median with mature palm trees and other vegetation, and on-street parallel parking that connects the Downtown with neighborhoods north and south of the project site. Pier Avenue is currently a two-lane boulevard with on-street parking, which supports a mix of commercial, and retail uses. The project site is accessed on foot or bicycle primarily by Pier Plaza or The Strand and by vehicles via 13th Court and 13th Street, which extend east to connect the site to Hermosa Avenue and Beach Drive, which extends for 500 feet south from 14th Street to Pier Plaza. The proposed hotel site is bordered to the north by the Beach House Hotel and to the northeast by City Parking Garage C, which is accessed off of a short two way section of 13th Street. Access to the site is constrained as 13th Court and Beach Drive are both narrow public alley type roads and 13th Street provides one-way east-outbound connectivity between Beach Drive and Hermosa Avenue. Three public parking lots, including surface lots A and B and Parking Garage C are located near the site. On-street metered public parking is also available along Hermosa Avenue and other public streets. However, available public parking can be at a premium in this area, particularly on summer weekends. Pier Plaza is one of the main activity centers in the City. Pier Plaza supports a range or restaurants, retail shops, bars, and night clubs, with an active night life that is sometimes of concern to City residents. The project site location at “Pier and Strand” is a key locus of the City. PI E R A V E N U E PI E R A V E N U E PIER PLAZAPIER PLAZA13TH COURT13TH COURT14TH COURT14TH COURT14TH STREET14TH STREETBEACH DRIVEBEACH DRIVE THE STRANDTHE STRAND 13TH STREET13TH STREET11TH STREET11TH STREETHERMOSA AVENUEHERMOSA AVENUE PALM DRIVEPALM DRIVE NOBLENOBLE PARKPARK BEACHBEACH HOUSEHOUSE HOTELHOTEL SOUTHERN SECTIONSOUTHERN SECTION LIFEGUARDLIFEGUARDPIER PLAZAPI E R A V E N U E 13TH COURT14TH COURTTHE STRAND BEACH DRIVE 13TH STREET14TH STREET11TH STREETHERMOSA AVENUE PALM DRIVE SOUTHERN SECTION LIFEGUARD BEACH HOUSE HOTEL A BC 2 1 3 4 ProposedProposed Hotel andHotel and Commercial UsesCommercial Uses Proposed Hotel and Commercial Uses NOBLE PARK 1From the Hermosa Beach General Plan February 2009. 2From the City of Hermosa Beach Public Parking Locations. LEGEND Existing and Potential Historic Structures 1 Parking Lots 2 Project Site Bijou Theatre (The Metropolitan) Insomniac Coffee House The Lighthouse Hermosa Hotel Lot A – 116 Spaces Lot B – 35 Spaces Lot C (Parking Structure) – 300 Spaces A B C 1 2 3 4 0 120 SCALE IN FEET Project Site N 2 FIGURE City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 13 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project applicant proposes to develop up to a 110-room hotel with supporting restaurant and commercial uses on the northwest corner of Pier Plaza and The Strand, the current site of the Mermaid Restaurant, Poop Deck Lounge, Good Stuff Café, Hermosa Cyclery and West Bay Apartments. The hotel would be developed as a single two-story building of up to 30 feet in height, with a total of three levels, including two above ground floors, and a basement. The hotel would include restaurants, outdoor dining areas, a lounge, lobby, and hotel support services on the ground floor, with the main hotel entrance off of 13th Court and Beach Drive (Table 1). The guest rooms and additional amenities would be located on the second floor. The basement would provide approximately 150 spaces of subterranean parking and additional hotel support services. The proposed two-story hotel would replace the existing single-story commercial uses, residential units, and 16 space private surface parking lot. Access to the hotel would be via a drop-off entryway off of Beach Drive and 13th Court, with access to the subterranean parking structure available from 13th Court. Guest rooms would face out over The Strand or Pier Avenue, with additional rooms looking north or east over 13th Court and Beach Drive. First floor design would include a large restaurant space along Pier Plaza, outdoor dining at Pier Plaza and The Strand. The ground floor would provide a range of visitor serving uses, including retail and restaurants, to maintain street level orientation, transparency, and interest along Pier Plaza and at its corner with The Strand. Offsite improvements would include installation of a public plaza on west end of 13th Street, with decorative paving, landscaping, and seating areas. Beach Drive and 13th Court near the site would also be improved with decorative paving, lighting and landscaping. Southern California Edison would provide electrical services. The Southern California Gas Company would provide natural gas service. Water service would be provided by Cal-Water and wastewater treated at the City of Los Angeles’ Hyperion Treat Plant, approximately 3 miles to the north. The proposed project would include a two-story hotel fronting over 200 feet of The Strand. The ground floor would provide a range of visitor amenities, including restaurants, outdoor dining, and a lobby/lounge. The second floor would provide guest rooms and amenities. Parking would be provided onsite as part of a 150-space subterranean garage. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 14 Table 1. Pier and Strand Hotel Project Summary Pier and Strand Hotel at a Glance Location: Corner of Pier Avenue and The Strand. Hotel: Two above ground stories, one basement level (30’ in height). Main Hotel Entrance: 13th Court near the corner of Beach Drive. Hotel Amenities: Up to 110 guestrooms, restaurants, retail uses, and outdoor dining. Public Uses: Ground floor restaurant, lounge and retail uses. Outdoor Space: Outdoor dining along Pier Avenue and 13th Street. Public Space Improvements: New plaza on 13th Street between The Strand and Beach Drive; new paving, lighting and landscaping on Beach Drive and 13th Court. Parking Structure Location: Subterranean garage provided onsite. Number of Parking Spaces: 150 Parking Structure Entrance: 13th Court. Pier and Strand Hotel Project Details Site 11-19 Pier Avenue and 1250 and 1272 The Strand, Hermosa Beach Land Use Designation General Commercial Zoning C-2 – Restricted Commercial, within Coastal Zone Site Acreage 0.8 acres Parcels Nos. 4183-002-001, 4183-002-002, 4183-002-003, 4183-002-004, 4183-002-017, 4183-002-018, and 4183-002-019 Height (Existing height limit - 30’) 30’ (2 stories) maximum proposed Site Access Main entrance on the corner of 13th Court and Beach Drive Proposed Uses Basement Level Parking Garage (150 spaces); hotel support services Ground Level Restaurants and retail spaces, outdoor dining, hotel drop-off area, and hotel support services Second Level Up to 110 guestrooms, outdoor guest amenities and a dining terrace; hotel support services City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 15 Required Legislative Actions/Entitlements The proposed project would require Planning Commission recommendations and City Council certification of the Pier and Strand Hotel Project Final EIR and approval of the following entitlements: Approval of a Precise Development Plan. Potential General Plan Amendment associated with vacation of portions of Beach Drive. Tentative Tract Map to combine parcels. Issuance of Demolition Permits for existing structures. Conditional Use permits to permit sale of alcohol, live entertainment, open facades or large operable windows or doors. Additional permits as required for road right of way vacation and encroachment permits. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 16 SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENT REVIEW SERVICES PROPOSED APPROACH TO KEY EIR PREPARTION TASKS Our technical approach to preparation of the EIR reflects the scope of services requested in the City’s RFP, background research, and follow-up communication with City staff through July 2015. This scope of work includes both thorough peer review by qualified experts of six applicant-prepared studies or reports and preparation of studies, modeling, and specific analysis by Amec Foster Wheeler technical experts (Table 2). Table 2. Approach to the Project’s Technical Studies Peer Review of Applicant-Prepared Studies Amec Foster Wheeler-Prepared Studies Historic resources evaluation Geotechnical investigations Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Drainage and hydrology analysis Transportation and parking study Site utilities analysis Photosimulations of project from six locations Air quality and greenhouse gas generation (GHG) modeling and analysis Climate change analysis Noise modeling and analysis Water supply assessment Cultural resources technical report Amec Foster Wheeler’s general approach to preparing the EIR is summarized below in Table 3. Where appropriate, we have combined tasks or subtasks set forth in the RFP for brevity and to help focus on major work effort. Table 3. Approach to Key Tasks Task 1 – Project Kickoff and Preliminary Work: Amec Foster Wheeler views the kickoff process and preliminary work as critical to successful completion of an adequate EIR. As part of the kickoff process and preliminary work effort, we would attend a kickoff meeting with City staff and the project applicant to help refine the project description, schedule, project scope, and available technical studies (e.g., transportation and parking study). Our project manager, deputy project manager, and key subconsultants (e.g., Fehr & Peers) would attend the project kickoff meeting. To facilitate a successful and efficient project kickoff, we will provide the following: A. Working and Communications Protocols: We would provide a communications plan to establish appropriate protocols governing communications between Amec Foster Wheeler and the applicant’s team, City departments, responsible agencies and service providers. A free flow of information will be essential to efficient and rapid completion of the EIR within the proposed schedule. However, to ensure City staff is kept fully informed, City staff would be copied on all correspondence. Alternately, such communications could be routed through City staff. B. Application Review and Technical Studies: Our team of experienced former local agency senior planners would review the project application for completeness, as well as peer review all City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 17 Table 3. Approach to Key Tasks supplemental materials, focusing on material need to support both the EIR and planning analysis (e.g., City ordinance requirements, project details, etc.). We would also prepare a request for additional information/incomplete letter (if required). Amec Foster Wheeler’s technical experts and management team would also review available applicant-prepared technical studies as early as possible to identify any information gaps, issues with methodology or scope and provide a list of recommended modifications. As part of this process, we would perform initial background review of existing available documents, such as site plans, recent EIRs, and the City‘s General Plan. C. Initial Study: We would prepare an IS of sufficient detail to help refine the scope of the EIR, provide supporting analysis for issues not addressed in detail in the EIR (e.g., agriculture, forestry, minerals, etc.) and to support the Notice of Preparation (NOP). We would use the IS as a tool for early identification of key issues of concern, as well as a set of preliminary mitigation measures. D. Identification of Required Permits Entitlements: We would work with City staff to refine required project permits and entitlements based on the initial list provided in the RFP (e.g., Precise Development Plan, Conditional Use Permits), particularly including potential for General Plan amendments. If requested, our team of planners would also assist the City with the Development Agreement or lease options for street vacations, etc. E. Key Stakeholders/ Interested Agencies: Early identification of key stakeholders, interested parties and responsible or interested agencies is an important aspect of the kickoff process. Amec Foster Wheeler would recommend that an initial list of stakeholders and interested parties be discussed during the kickoff meeting and that the most appropriate methods of engaging these parties be identified. Groups such as the Chamber of Commerce, the Keep Hermosa- Hermosa community group, the Surfrider Foundation, Heal the Bay, Sierra Club South Bay Group, and the Natural Resources Defense Council may all be interested in the proposed project. Agencies such as the California Coastal Commission and Regional Water Quality Control Board and service providers (e.g., Cal-Water) will have permit authority or be interested in the proposed project. We would work with City staff to establish an outreach and communication plan to ensure that stakeholders and interested agencies are engaged early in the process and that their concerns are identified and addressed in the EIR and planning and permitting analyses. Task 1 Deliverables: Amec Foster Wheeler will prepare and submit: Communications protocol. Memo of information needs and/ or incomplete letter; memo identifying information gaps and needed updates of available technical studies. Draft and Final IS. Updated list of all permits and entitlements; initial list of key stakeholders, interested and responsible agencies. Task 2 – Notice of Preparation of a Draft EIR: City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 18 Table 3. Approach to Key Tasks We understand that the NOP and other early outreach activities (e.g., key stakeholder meetings) are a key element of preparation of an adequate EIR and are central to efficient process of a major project. As part of Task 2, we will provide the following: A. NOP: We will prepare and circulate an NOP for this project that summarizes conclusions of the IS, which can be made available online (or circulated with the NOP, if requested). The NOP will be particularly important to obtain comments on the EIR scope and project alternatives from area residents, property owners, community organizations and other parties with interest in Downtown Core development projects. Obtaining early feedback from these and other key stakeholders will minimize the potential for project delays and unforeseen issues arising late in the process. B. Scoping Meetings: We will prepare, organize, and conduct the project scoping meetings for the project. We recommend one meeting in the afternoon and one in early evening to facilitate a high level of attendance. We will prepare a PowerPoint presentation for the formal meeting, facilitate the public comment period, and record all comments received. As part of the presentation, we would provide an overview of the proposed project, identify initial potential impacts/ key issues of concern, provide an overview of the process and schedule, and describe upcoming opportunities for public involvement. We also recommend that less formal exchanges be held as well to permit individual questions and answers to help inform attendees about the project and permit process. C. Agency and Stakeholder Consultation: Under City direction, we will confer in person as appropriate and via phone with key stakeholders and agencies to ensure that concerns are thoroughly understood and addressed in the EIR. D. Refine EIR Scope and Approach: We will review all comments received on the NOP, at the scoping meetings, and through informal agency/ stakeholder consultation. In consultation with City staff, we would adjust the proposed EIR scope and approach as warranted. E. NOP Responses: All comments and letters received on NOP will be compiled into a matrix to permit easy tracking and to ensure issues are addressed by indicating where such comments have been incorporated and responded to in the Draft EIR. This will assure reviewers that their comments have been responded to and ease their review of the Draft EIR. F. Baseline Conditions and Thresholds: Amec Foster Wheeler will identify initial key baseline conditions and issues for inclusion in the EIR (e.g., existing parking demand, trip generation, water use), including any unique baseline conditions for both the proposed hotel and parking garage sites. We will also develop a list of suggested thresholds of significance based on CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, adopted City policies, regulatory agency standards, recent vicinity EIRs, and technical expert recommendations. Task 2 Deliverables: Amec Foster Wheeler will prepare and submit: A Draft and Final NOP. PowerPoint presentation and displays for scoping meeting. A scoping matrix with initial responses to comments on the NOP. Recommended adjustments to scope and approach as needed in response NOP comments. Memo with suggested key baseline assumptions and recommended thresholds of significance. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 19 Table 3. Approach to Key Tasks Task 3 – Prepare Draft EIR: Amec Foster Wheeler suggests that the Draft EIR preparation Task be approached as follows: A. Project Description and Concept Alternatives: A complete project description is the foundation of an adequate EIR. The project description will be refined in coordination with City staff and the project applicant (subject to staff approval) to ensure accuracy and to account for updated design changes. We will use information obtained from available project plans and renderings, staff reports, and technical studies to prepare the project description. In consultation with City staff, we will also prepare initial concept alternative project summaries along with the project description. We will provide an early review draft of the project description and concept alternatives to City staff for review and approval to assure accuracy up-front to minimize or avoid potential delays. B. Prepare Administrative (Preliminary) Draft EIR (ADEIR): The ADEIR will address direct and indirect impacts for all environmental resources and issues, as well as standard CEQA sections such as growth inducement, climate change, and consistency with adopted plans and policies, in addition to an analysis of the impacts associated with project alternatives and their comparison with project impacts. The ADEIR will include an Executive Summary, including an impact summary table of all impacts and mitigation measures. The ADEIR will respond to issues raised during the scoping and public comment period, as well as updated baseline issues and thresholds of significance prepared as part of Task 2. Key issues to be addressed in the ADEIR are summarized below in Proposed Scope of Environmental Impact Analysis. C. Screencheck Draft EIR: Consistent with City standards, we will submit a final screencheck copy of the Draft EIR to the City prior to publication. The screencheck review of the Draft EIR ensures incorporation of all City comments and provides staff with an opportunity to verify that comments and questions were adequately addressed. D. Prepare Public Draft EIR: We will address all City comments on the final Screencheck Draft EIR, make any required versions, and prepared and publish the Draft EIR. E. Notice of Completion: We will complete all noticing for the project, including preparation and transmittal of the Notice of Completion (NOC), mailed notices to NOP respondents, key stakeholders and responsible agencies, preparation of newspaper ads for noticing of the project and all other outreach and assistance required for noticing of Public Draft EIR review. F. Draft EIR Public Hearing: We will prepare and assist City staff with the public hearing(s) on the Draft EIR before the City Planning Commission to receive comments. We will present the EIR findings if requested by City staff using a PowerPoint presentation and other display materials (e.g., poster boards, as appropriate) Task 3 Deliverables: Amec Foster Wheeler will prepare and submit: ADEIR: Five (5) hard copies and one (1) electronic version (Microsoft Word® and PDF versions). Screencheck Draft EIR: One (1) hard copy and electronic version (Microsoft Word® and PDF versions). Public Draft EIR: Thirty (30) hard copies of the Public Draft EIR (each with a technical appendix on CD) and five (5) hard copies of the appendices; thirty (30) CDs (PDF version) of the Draft EIR are City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 20 Table 3. Approach to Key Tasks also recommended for those preferring to receive electronic copies, and one (1) CD with the Draft EIR and appendices in Microsoft Word® and PDF versions. State Clearinghouse Submittal: Fifteen (15) CDs of the PDF version of the entire Draft EIR and fifteen (15) hard copies of the Executive Summary. Web Versions: One (1) CD of the entire Draft EIR document formatted for fast web viewing and broken into individual chapters for easy download from City’s website (20MB file size limit). Public Hearing: PowerPoint presentation and displays to support presentation of Draft EIR. Task 4 - Prepare Response to Comments, and Administrative Final EIR: Amec Foster Wheeler suggests that preparation of the Response to Comments, and Administrative Final EIR be approached as follows: A. Prepare Response to Comments: We would prepare and submit an administrative draft of the responses to written and oral comments received on the Draft EIR during the (recommended) 60-day public review period for review and comment by City staff. We would incorporate substantiating technical details, CEQA references, and court cases as needed to support proposed responses. This submittal would indicate where changes in text of the EIR (by subsection) are anticipated. All comments and responses will be organized in an easy to use format to facilitate review by the City and the community. B. Additional Analyses or Studies: We would prepare additional technical studies or analyses needed consistent with the approved budget to support preparation of an adequate and sustainable Final EIR. C. Prepare Administrative (Preliminary) Final EIR: After receipt of City comments on the Response to Comments, we would prepare the Administrative Final EIR. The Administrative Final EIR will include the Draft EIR in its entirety with changed pages in strikeout and underline formatting to address changes and a detailed Response to Comments to incorporate City changes. To assist in maintaining project schedule, our staff would attend a working meeting with City staff to finalize review of comments and proposed responses, as well as potential changes to Draft EIR text. Task 4 Deliverables: Amec Foster Wheeler will prepare and submit: Response to Comments: Ten (10) hard copies and one (1) CD with an electronic version (Microsoft Word®). Administrative Final EIR: We recommend five (5) hard copies and one (1) electronic version (Microsoft Word® and PDF versions). Revised Studies: Additional or amended studies as warranted. Task 5 – Prepare Final EIR and Project Decisions: Amec Foster Wheeler suggests that preparation of the Final EIR be approached as follows: A. Prepare Screencheck Final EIR: Although not called for in the RFP, our team suggests that a screencheck Final EIR be provided to the City prior to publication. We will incorporate any City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 21 Table 3. Approach to Key Tasks changes into the Screencheck EIR necessary to reflect City comments and final direction for the environmental analysis, with particular attention to refinement of mitigation measures. B. Prepare Final EIR: Upon receipt of final City comments, we will prepare and submit the Final EIR which will include the Draft EIR in its entirety with changed pages in strikeout and underline to address changes, detailed Responses to Comments to incorporate City changes, and the Final Mitigation Measure and Reporting Program (MMRP; see below). We would ensure that all commenting public agencies receive a response to their comments on the EIR, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15088. C. Noticing: We will complete all noticing for the project, including preparation and transmittal of the Notice of Availability, mailed notices to EIR commenter’s, key stakeholders and agencies, preparation of newspaper ads for noticing of the project. We suggest that additional outreach with key stakeholders and responsible agencies be considered during the Final EIR preparation stage, if warranted to adjust mitigation measures or conditions of approval (if warranted) prior to decision-maker hearings. This may enable a smoother hearing process by addressing any residual concerns. D. Mitigation Measures and Reporting Program: We will ensure that the MMRP identifies mitigation measures, responsible parties or agencies, implementing actions and timing for the direct and indirect project impacts and potential cumulative impacts. E. Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations: We will assist City staff with preparation of the findings and statement of overriding considerations (if required). Our team has considerable experience preparing such findings and overriding considerations for complex regional projects and recognizes that appropriately detailed findings and overriding considerations which provide substantial evidence are a key part of the administrative record and central to the legal sustainability of project approval. D. EIR Certification Hearings: We will prepare and assist City staff with the public hearing(s) on the Final EIR before the City Planning Commission and City Council. We will present the EIR findings if requested by City staff using a PowerPoint presentation and other display materials (e.g., poster boards, as appropriate). E. Post-Certification: We will provide a clean copy of the Final EIR and appendices and a final MMRP. Task 5 Deliverables: Amec Foster Wheeler will prepare and submit: Screencheck Final EIR: If desired, one (1) hard copy and one (1) CD with electronic versions (Microsoft Word® and PDF) for final copy check review. Final EIR: Thirty (30) hard copies of the Final EIR (each with a technical appendix on CD) and five (5) hard copies of the appendices; thirty (30) CDs (PDF version) of the Final EIR are also recommended for those preferring to receive electronic copies, and one (1) CD with the Final EIR and appendices in Microsoft Word® and PDF versions. Public Hearing: PowerPoint presentation and displays to support presentation of Final EIR. State Clearinghouse Submittal: One (1) hard copy and one (1) CD with electronic versions (Microsoft Word® and PDF) City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 22 Table 3. Approach to Key Tasks Web Versions: One (1) CD of the entire Final EIR document formatted for fast web viewing and broken into individual chapters for easy download from City’s website (20MB file size limit). MMRP: Provided as part of the Final EIR hard copies and digital deliverables, we would provide an additional two (2) stapled or bound copies, and one (1) copy on CD (both in PDF and Microsoft Word®). Findings: If required, two (2) stapled or bound copies, and one (1) copy on CD (both in PDF and Word® Task 6 – Meetings and Hearings Amec Foster Wheeler’s proposed budget assumes attendance by selected members of our management team at meetings or public hearings. Our project manager, Dan Gira, would be available for six (6) meetings; our deputy project manager would be available for three (3) meetings; and our senior land use planner would be available for three (3) meetings. At the discretion of City staff, our attendance may include the kickoff meeting, scoping hearing, Draft EIR hearing, and Planning Commission and City Council hearings, as well as a public workshop, stakeholder, and/or working meetings as determined necessary. We suggest that the working or stakeholder meetings and hearings are arranged on the same days to ensure efficient use of the budget. We propose that these meetings occur during full onsite work days to maximize efficiency and conduct multiple onsite tasks. For example, we would be available for a full work day to attend the kick off meeting, conduct a site visit, and participate in stakeholder meetings or meetings with agency staff to address permit processes. This approach maximizes our team’s availability to work as part of the City team and minimizes costs and schedule delays. We have also included attendance of up to two (2) meetings (kickoff, scoping) and two (2) teleconferences by Fehr & Peers, and one (1) site visit from VIZf/x. Our team would prepare draft agendas and minutes for such meetings and PowerPoint and other presentation materials as requested for other meetings. Our project manager would attend additional meeting(s) at a cost of approximately $1,400 per meeting. See Proposal Assumptions below for additional details. Additionally, we would facilitate and participate in weekly calls with the City team. Our team is known for our flexibility and availability to accommodate the City’s scheduling needs and potential impromptu calls and short-notice meetings. Task 7 - Planning Support Services: Amec Foster Wheeler recognizes that the proposed project includes challenging planning and permitting issues including General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan consistency, multiple entitlements and discretionary permits required under City's ordinances, and Coastal Commission’s approval of a Coastal Development Permit. Our team of experienced land use planners will assist the City staff with project permitting and planning issues as follows: A. As part of the preliminary work, our planners would review the project application and a re- submittal of application information prepared by the applicant's team. Under City direction, we would work with the applicant's team and City staff to ensure that submitted plans provide an adequate basis for evaluation of requested permits and identify any required modifications. B. We would then prepare a second completeness determination letter including a request for additional information or clarification, if required. A complete application is required in City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 23 Table 3. Approach to Key Tasks accordance with the State’s Permit Streamlining Act and will be essential for project processing and preparation of an adequate EIR. C. Our team would also review the project's required entitlements and related permit processes. We would prepare a brief memo defining our recommended approach to manage the multiple permit processes and related schedules. This memo would include recommendations for timing of initial outreach and meetings with key responsible agencies such as the Coastal Commissions, service providers, and City Departments (e.g., Public Works). Early outreach meetings can result in a smoother and more timely permitting process, understanding of agency requirements and expected project conditions, and continue to define an overall permit and hearing schedule complying with Permit Streamlining Act mandates. D. After completion of preliminary planning, zoning, and other related analyses, our planners would continue to provide input into the EIR to ensure that it thoroughly identifies and addressed all required permits and entitlements, and discusses key policy and ordinance issues within the Land Use and Development analysis. A thorough evaluation of these issues in the EIR will provide a firm basis for preparation of staff reports for the proposed project. E. Following public comment on the Draft EIR and prior to release of the first staff report, our team, along with City staff, would be available for a public outreach meeting to address planning issues of concern raised by the public, if determined necessary by City staff. Such a meeting can be an important element of the planning process to ensure the public that issues are heard by City staff prior to finalization of the staff report. F. As part of final design review and project conditioning, our team would support City staff and the applicants' team to discuss any desired or recommended design changes (e.g. adjustments to the project in response to potential mitigation measures), recommended conditions of approval, the upcoming permit process, and any new information needs. G. Our team would prepare one major staff report each for the Planning Commission and City Council, and one follow up staff report to respond to questions and requests for information from each decision-making body. We would work closely with City staff throughout the decision-maker process, including coordination of presentation materials and staff reports. H. Each major staff report will include a summary of EIR findings, including the viability and benefits of potential project alternatives, evaluation of project consistency with adopted City General Plan and Coastal Land Use Plan policies, conformity with adopted City municipal code and ordinances and a draft set of recommended conditions of approval based on EIR mitigation measures, City policies and codes and required conditions to address responsible agency or service provider requests. If EIR alternatives are identified that address key environmental impacts or improve consistency with City ordinances and policies, our team would work with City staff and the project applicant to present such analysis. I. We will prepare PowerPoint presentations for decision-maker hearings. J. Coordinate with City staff to track the City's ongoing General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan program to identify any emerging issues of concern related to the project, particularly consistency with emerging goals and policies. If appropriate, ensure that staff reports City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 24 Table 3. Approach to Key Tasks discuss such emerging issues and the project's consistency with the goals, objectives and policies of the proposed General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan, even if the plan is not in effect. For a major transformative project such as the Pier and Strand Hotel, it will be important for the public and decision-makers to be aware of its relationship to and consistency with the new guiding planning documents. Our team members are available to work onsite as an extension of staff with the City team. As described in Task 6 above, our senior planner can attend up to three (3) meetings. Additional meetings can be provided for at a set cost. This in-person service will be especially important during staff report preparation phases and entitlements processing to ensure timely deliverables and efficient approval of entitlements and EIR certification. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 25 PROPOSED SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS In accordance with CEQA, the EIR will focus on and address key direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Pier and Strand Hotel Project. These issue areas include Aesthetics/ Visual Resources, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources/Historic Structures, Geology/Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use & Development/Planning (including project relationship to the pending General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan rewrite), Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Transportation and Parking, Utilities, and standard CEQA Mandatory Findings of Significance. It is anticipated that issues related to Agriculture, Forestry, and Minerals can be fully addressed and scoped out of the EIR in the Initial Study based on initial review; this assessment would be refined after completion of the Initial Study. As requested in the City’s RFP, our scope assumes that analysis of Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Cultural Resources (Historic Structures) Hydrology and Water Resources, Transportation and Parking and analysis of onsite and adjacent utility improvements will rely on peer review of applicant prepared studies, unless specified below. Aesthetics and Visual Resources: The proposed project site is located within the heart of the City’s commercial district adjacent to The Strand and Pier Plaza. The Strand and Pier Plaza are two of the City’s primary outdoor, social, and entertainment centers and receive heavy use by both residents and visitors. Pier Plaza is lined with a mix of generally one and two story primarily older commercial structures, while The Strand in this area is characterized by one- to three- story commercial and hotel uses. The beach immediately west of The Strand is a key City open space and recreational resource and the project site borders a heavily used complex of City beach volleyball courts. Sweeping beach and ocean views are available from The Strand, with more limited beach and ocean views available from Pier Plaza. The proposed project would replace two single-story structures and a small surface parking lot at the busy corner of The Strand and Pier Plaza intersection with a two-story hotel of up to 30 feet in height. This increase over existing building height may affect existing views or cast shadows existing shade sensitive uses and public open space. Pier Plaza supports a mix of generally 1-2 story buildings with outdoor seating in a pedestrian environment. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 26 The Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy stresses the importance of transparency and 1st floor activated uses on this and other opportunity sites. Amec Foster Wheeler is aware that initial public concerns have been voiced regarding the size of the project and potential lack of transparency and active uses on the first floor. While the proposed project includes active 1st floor commercial uses on both 13th Court and Pier Avenue, project details will need to be refined in the early stages of environmental review and application completeness. In order to assess potential changes to visual and aesthetic resources and community character, Amec Foster Wheeler would: Review application materials and all applicant-prepared renderings of the project. Characterize the existing physical setting in terms of visual character and public views, including generally one and two story buildings along Pier Plaza. Describe potentially scenic resources in the vicinity, such as beach and ocean views, older potentially historic structures in the vicinity, and corridor views along Pier Plaza, including specimen palm trees. Describe the existing visual character of the project site, including the existing structures (e.g., Mermaid Restaurant Building). Identify up to six key public viewing locations of these sites as a basis for preparation of photosimulations; coordinate with City staff on selection of key viewing locations. Prepare six computer generated photosimulations that provide accurate perspective views indicating building massing, architectural elements, façade design, landscape treatments, pedestrian amenities, proposed streetscape modifications (e.g., 13th Street Plaza; decorative paving) and other elements of the proposed design as appropriate to permit public and City decision-maker understanding of the proposed project’s impacts on public views and community character. Supplement photosimulations through the use of site photographs, project site plans, renderings, and carefully labeled elevation and landscape plans to further illustrate and describe potential changes in Existing key public views in the project vicinity include sweeping views of the beach and ocean from The Strand, a key recreational and open space resource for City residents and visitors. The proposed Project would replace older single story buildings with a two-story hotel of contemporary design; outdoor seating for dining would continue and be expanded. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 27 character of the site and existing view corridors, including the relationship of first floor uses to key public areas such as The Strand, potential consistency with surrounding or adjacent structures (e.g., potentially historic insomniac building), and impacts to potential loss of mature trees. Describe adverse and beneficial cumulative impacts associated with the proposed projects in the vicinity, including potential changes to Pier Plaza (e.g., playground), Hermosa Avenue streetscape improvements, and possible construction of a parking structure and additional hotel south of Pier Plaza, if submitted or pending at time of EIR preparation; Build upon photosimulations and applicant-prepared renderings to generally describe potential shadow impacts on adjacent structures including effects on residential uses, existing or potential solar utilization, and exterior living spaces. Shade/shadow modeling can be provided at an added cost. Identify mitigation measures, as necessary, to reduce impacts, including adjustments in project design elements as experienced from the adjacent public realm (e.g., outdoor space, activated 1st floor uses) or changes in façade design or building heights. We would coordinate closely with City staff on any measures that would substantially affect project design. Amec Foster Wheeler’s Visual Resource Specialist, Rita Bright, would oversee this effort and our team’s licensed architect, Bob Staehle, would prepare photosimulations and provide feedback on mitigation measures affecting project design. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Air Quality and GHGs sections would document existing conditions and South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), state and federal regulatory standards and thresholds, and describe attainment/non-attainment pollutants for the South Coast Air Basin. We recognize that the proposed project constitutes infill development and as such is generally consistent with the intent of evolving local, state, and federal efforts at controlling and reducing GHG generation and associated climate changes effects. However, as a significant new development, the project has the potential to incrementally contribute to air pollution and GHG generation and climate change. Based on net new trip generation estimates provided in the applicant’s traffic study as peer reviewed by Fehr & Peers and modeled emissions on stationary source emissions, Amec Foster Wheeler would address localized and regional air quality and GHG issues as follows: Describe existing air quality conditions within the South Coast Air Basin in context of the SCAQMD regulatory setting. Provide an up-to-date description of the current regulatory setting regarding GHG generation and climate change and assess project consistency with AB 32, SB 375, State Attorney General, Office of Planning and Research and Climate Action Team recommendations, City actions (e.g., cool cities plan; Carbon Neutrality Road Map) and other recent state and federal regulations and standards. Utilize existing data and new traffic analysis in the applicant’s traffic study as confirmed by Fehr & Peers to identify and analyze potential existing and/or future local CO Hot Spots that could be impacted by project traffic. Existing data for the project vicinity identifies multiple intersections with known existing or City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 28 potential future congestion (e.g., PCH with Aviation and Artesia Boulevards). Given anticipated levels of project generated traffic, we anticipate that up to four intersections would be modeled for CO Hot Spots. Address issues related to Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) such as diesel particulate emissions, particularly from construction on adjacent public areas such as The Strand and Pier Plaza, as well as to adjacent uses, such as the Beach House Hotel. Utilize SCAQMD’s adopted thresholds for assessment of potential impacts to localized and regional air quality. We recognize that limited guidance exists to date on thresholds for GHG emissions and would thus use guidance from SCAQMD to determine project consistency and a specified level of emissions for threshold purposes. Assess potential project impacts and quantify emissions associated with increased traffic using CalEEMod Version 2013.2.2, or the latest version available at the time of the project kickoff. Analyses will also take into consideration existing mobile and stationary source emissions associated with the site, as well as detailing modeling assumptions that acknowledge shared trips where hotel guests, restaurant, lounge or retail patrons may also be visiting other businesses in the Downtown Core. Quantify direct (increased traffic and construction equipment) and indirect emissions (electrical power generation) using CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2., or latest available version) for temporary construction and on-going operational emissions. Identify potential mitigation measures for both air quality and GHG emissions impacts, if required. We do not anticipate project contributions to GHG generation be significant, but would provide potential recommended mitigation measures to further improve consistency with appropriate standards, if warranted. Measures would address both construction and operation impacts and may include a construction management plan to govern heavy truck trips, NOx and fugitive dust control plans, employee Transportation Demand Management Program, etc. Mr. Steve Ochs, Amec Foster Wheeler’s Air Quality Engineer, would oversee this effort. Biological Resources: The proposed project site is fully developed with structures and surface parking lots and is surrounded by developed urban uses. As such, potential impacts to biological resources are limited to potential or disturbance to migratory birds using site structures and vegetation, indirect impacts due to changes in runoff and incremental impacts to marine wildlife, or secondary impacts associated with increased visitation. Our scope includes preparation of a brief biological resource section to address such impacts; however, Amec Foster Wheeler recommends that the City consider addressing impacts to biology in the Initial Study only. Cultural Resources: The Pier and Strand Hotel Project site is fully developed with existing restaurant and retail buildings and surface parking lots. Existing structures on the site appear to have been constructed between 1922 and 1946, potentially qualifying as historic resources under CEQA. Other historic-era buildings and structures also exist in the area, including the Bijou Theater (the Metropolitan), a State Historic Landmark east of the project site, and the Insomniac Coffeehouse building, a potential historic structure east of the proposed hotel. In addition, City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 29 the potential exists for subsurface archaeological remains and marine and terrestrial paleontological resources to be present beneath the project site. In order to determine potential impacts to cultural and paleontological, Amec Foster Wheeler’s team would: Peer review the historic built environment evaluation report being prepared by the applicant’s consultant for accuracy and adequacy. There are known historic-period buildings in the immediate vicinity of the project that may qualify as historical resources under CEQA––such as the Lighthouse, the Hermosa Hotel, Bank of America Building, and the Bijou Theatre, the integrity of which may be subject to potential visual impacts by the proposed project. Perform a reconnaissance-level site visit to confirm and document conditions of existing potentially historic structures on and adjacent to the project site. The results of the peer review of the applicant’s historic built environment evaluation report will be supplied to the City in a stand-alone memorandum. The memo will indicate the sufficiency of the report and DPR forms for CEQA purposes and whether our team concurs with the findings and recommendations. If our review results in non-concurrence with the applicant’s findings and recommendations, the basis of the non-concurrence will be fully explained in the memo. Obtain a records search from the California Historical Resources Information System-South Central Coastal Information Center (CHRIS-SCCIC) to identify known archaeological resources that are located within the project area or within a half mile of its boundaries. Data sources for the records search will include historic maps and aerial photographs of the project vicinity, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Register of Historical Resources (CHRHR), California Points of Historical Interest, California Historical Landmarks, Historic Properties Directory, and the California Inventory of Historical Resources. Copies of the relevant Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps and historic aerial imagery showing the historic development of the subject parcels will also be obtained. The results of this background research will provide a basis for assessing the sensitivity of the project area for buried cultural resources. Contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and request a search of their Sacred Lands File plus a list of local tribal contacts. They will contact local tribal representatives by mail and through follow-up telephone calls to describe the project site, the nature of the proposed project, and request information regarding issues of concern to the local tribes. Obtain a records search from the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM), including a review of all known fossil localities and fossiliferous geologic formations within the project boundaries and immediate vicinity. Results will indicate whether there are previously recorded paleontological resources. In addition, a review of the University of California, Museum of Paleontology’s online database will be performed, which contains additional paleontological records for Los Angeles County. To supplement museum collections records, review published and unpublished geologic mapping and literature to identify the geology and paleontology of the area. The results of the records search and literature review will provide a basis for assessing the paleontological resource potential (i.e., sensitivity) of the project site. The results will be presented in a stand-alone technical memorandum to be appended to the EIR. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 30 Perform an archaeological sensitivity assessment using historic Sanborn Fire Insurance maps, aerial imagery, historic photographs, and other historic data to construct a general history of the property’s development, uses, and types of development and disturbance through time. Buildings, structures, and associated features previously present on the property will be identified through that process to delineate potential intact archaeological features and deposits that may remain. Prepare a technical report discussing the results of the records searches, Native American consultation, historic built environment significance evaluations, and impact assessments. The report will introduce the project, detail the results of background research, outline investigative methods, present the cultural setting and historical overview of the project site, summarize the historic built environment resources and evaluation findings, assess the archaeological and paleontological sensitivity of the project site, assess potential impacts that would be caused by the proposed actions, and offer recommendations for any needed mitigation. Once the City approves the draft report, a final report will be produced to be appended to the EIR and sections to be included in the body of the EIR. Identify direct and indirect impacts to historic and cultural resources, including historic buildings and subsurface remains. Prepare a brief technical report for paleontological resources, including a geologic setting and existing conditions, assessment of potential impacts to significant resources, and mitigation measures to reduce significant project impacts. Identify potential direct and indirect project-specific impacts to paleontological resources. Address cumulative impacts, including those to historic structures and subsurface cultural and paleontological remains. For project impacts that are determined to be significant, identify mitigation measures including pre- construction survey and salvage or collection of known resources, pre-construction worker's training, construction monitoring, matrix sampling, fossil salvage and curation, and final reporting. This effort would be led by Applied EarthWorks with oversight by Amec Foster Wheeler’s management team. Applied EarthWorks Technical Report would be provided as an appendix for the EIR. Geology/ Soils: The proposed project would include substantial grading and excavation in order to prepare the site for construction of subterranean uses, including one level of below ground parking and the basement level of the hotel. Additional excavation and construction (e.g., use of pikes or caissons) may be required to construct foundations capable of supporting the proposed two-story structure. Proposed grading and project construction could create onsite geologic impacts along with some secondary impacts, such as construction- related traffic (see Transportation; Noise, Air Quality). To address this issue, Amec Foster Wheeler’s would: Peer review applicant prepared geotechnical analysis and soils reports, particularly recommendations for addressing high groundwater, waterproofing, drainage and foundation design. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 31 Review available data (e.g., USGS maps, Alquist-Priolo maps) regarding local and regional seismic, geologic and soils constraints to provide a basis for assessment of impacts related to regional seismicity, soils constraints (e.g., liquefaction) excavation, grading, and the adequacy of foundation, retaining wall, and drainage design, as well as for consistency with applicant prepared studies. Describe the geologic setting of the project site based on existing reports and maps, including the City’s General Plan, U.S. Geological Survey maps, applicant-prepared studies, and other available technical documents. Assess geologic impacts by evaluating project construction and design components, with particular focus on proposed excavation and parking garage stability and high groundwater issues and potential secondary effects on neighboring structures. Describe cumulative impacts associated with planned and pending projects. Identify mitigation measures such as parking garage retaining wall construction, drainage requirements, and other measures necessary to address geologic concerns. Dr. Debanik Chauduri, an Amec Foster Wheeler senior registered geologist, would oversee preparation of this analysis. Hazards and Hazardous Materials: The project site is currently developed with single story retail/restaurant and residential buildings and a paved surface parking lot. Initial site development is thought to have commenced in the 1920s with arrange of uses occurring on the site over time. The site is located near both Pier and Hermosa Avenues, busy roadway corridors that have historically supported a variety of uses, including commercial and service commercial uses. Accordingly, the potential exists for soil and groundwater contamination, the presence of underground storage tanks, or other hazards from these past and ongoing activities. In addition, based on the ages of the building, there is the potential for materials that can be harmful to human health, such as asbestos, lead- based paint (LBP), mold, or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), to be released when they are disturbed during demolition and transport activities. To address this issue, Amec Foster Wheeler’s would: Review available/applicable data, reports, and hazardous materials reporting records. Our hazardous materials specialist would peer review the applicant-prepared Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for adequacy to assess if there are information gaps, issues with methodology or conclusions; issues of concerns and recommendations would be documented in a memo to the City with suggested corrective actions identified. Describe the hazards and hazardous materials setting of the project site based on existing reports and maps, including U.S. EPA and California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) hazardous materials databases (Envirofacts and Envirostor, respectively), City Fire Department Hazardous Materials database, and other available technical documents. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 32 Assess hazards and hazardous materials impacts by evaluating project construction and design components, with particular focus on proposed excavation, demolition, and potential secondary effects on neighboring structures and uses and adjacent public use areas, such as The Strand. Identify mitigation measures necessary to address hazards and hazardous material concerns. Mr. Brian Londquist, Amec Foster Wheeler’s Hazardous Materials Specialist would oversee preparation of this analysis. Hydrology and Water Quality: The project site lies within the watershed of the Santa Monica Bay overlying the western edge of the West Coast Groundwater Basin, though this portion of the basin is not used for potable water. Although upper Pier Avenue has been retrofitted with a storm water infiltration system, urban and storm water runoff drains from the project vicinity appears to runoff directly into the Santa Monica Bay through the urban storm drain system. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) for the City of Hermosa Beach, the project area is not located within a 100-year flood plain, although the entire beach west of The Strand lies in Zone A. As the project site is already developed, redevelopment would not greatly increase the area of impervious surfaces. However, soil disturbance and increased development could change the amount and direction of runoff. In addition, excavation of subterranean parking areas within basement floor of the hotel building may encounter high groundwater, with associated discharge issues. To address issues associated with Hydrology and Water Quality, Amec Foster Wheeler would: Peer review the applicant-prepared hydrology and drainage study and identify gaps in information, issues regarding methodology, and potentially unsubstantiated conclusions; provide analysis of the report to the City in a memorandum. Review available background data from City and regional plans regarding depth of groundwater, storm water flows and drainage (e.g., Ocean Plan) for adequacy associated with past project construction (e.g., Pier Avenue Streetscape Project). Describe the hydrologic setting of the project site based on existing reports and maps, including the U.S. Geological Survey maps, FIRM maps (including any updates that account for sea level rise), and other available technical documents. Assess hydrologic and water quality impacts by evaluating total estimated construction, including estimated changes in urban runoff quantify and quality, accounting for current standards for management of storm water flows. Address potential impacts of deep excavation for subterranean uses and potential groundwater-related impacts (in coordination with geology section), and incremental increases in consumption of groundwater supplies from the West Coast Groundwater Basin. Describe cumulative impacts associated with planned and pending projects. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 33 Identify mitigation measures, such as low impact development (LID), pervious surfaces, drainage requirements, groundwater infiltration prevention measures and discharge requirements, and other measures necessary to address hydrologic or water quality concerns. Amec Foster Wheeler’s senior hydrogeologist Mr. Craig Stewart would oversee this effort. Land Use and Development/ Planning: The project site is designated for General Commercial uses in the City’s General Plan and is located within the City’s Downtown Core as identified in the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy. Land use within the Downtown Core is dominated by commercial uses, including smaller retail stores, restaurants, bars, and night clubs. The entertainment focus of the Downtown has been identified as creating social issues associated with the area’s role as a late night club and bar destination. These issues and a potential reorientation of the area are addressed in a number of City documents, particularly the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy. The site is identified in the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy as an opportunity site for both hotel and ground floor retail development. The proposed project could meet emerging economic and Downtown revitalization goals. However, the project has the potential to raise issues of concern related to maintaining the small character of Hermosa Beach due to its increase in height and scale and parking demand in an already congested area. In order to address these issues, Amec Foster Wheeler would: Describe existing land use setting and regulatory framework for the project. Describe the existing setting with regard to existing uses along Pier Plaza, The Strand, and 13th Street/ 13th Court and their relationship to the project site. This assessment would outline adopted policies that apply to the Downtown area and that guide commercial development Identify and address potential consistency with the City’s existing General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan, the proposed General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan rewrite (as available), Sustainability Plan, Beach Cities Livability Plan (2011), and any emerging directions in Downtown Core planning as set forth in the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy. Discuss the regional planning context, such as the Southern California Association of Governments Regional Transportation Plan and the Growth Vision report, and the project’s relationship to both regional growth management plans (e.g., Compass Blueprint; Sustainable Communities Strategy), the relationship to Hermosa Beach and projects within its Downtown Core, and City sustainability goals. (e.g., reductions in average per capita vehicle miles traveled, limiting increases in energy demand, congestion, pollutant emissions and GHGs). Identify potential land use impacts, including project consistency with existing General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan designations and policies, and consistency with adopted City plans, policies, and ordinances. Describe any potential changes in the land use regulatory environment that emerge from the General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan update and their relationship to the proposed project. Discuss potential for cumulative impacts associated with planned and pending projects in the vicinity. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 34 Identify potential mitigation measures (e.g., changes in project design, community benefits) as needed to address land use impacts. Ms. Rita Bright, Amec Foster Wheeler’s senior land use planner would oversee this effort. Noise: The City’s Downtown Core is a visitor-serving retail and entertainment district with a high percentage of restaurants and a number of bars and night clubs. The Beach House Hotel, Sea Sprite Motel, and residential uses, including scattered beach cottages and second floor apartments located along 11th and 14th Streets/Courts, would be considered as sensitive noise receptors in the project vicinity, as well as The Strand and beach. Project construction has the potential to generate noise and groundborne vibration that could adversely affect sensitive receptors in the project vicinity. Noise and vibration may occur during construction phases of the project, as well as from ongoing operations of the proposed hotel and commercial uses, such as increased traffic congestion or building heating and cooling infrastructure. To quantify and evaluate the potential impacts related to construction and operational noise and vibration, Amec Foster Wheeler would: Describe existing noise levels in the project vicinity based on both existing available data (e.g., recent EIRs) and sound level measurements performed by an Amec Foster Wheeler Noise Analyst. Using a Quest Technologies 2200 Type I Integrating Sound Level Meter, our Noise Analysts would record average sound levels at 2 locations for ten minute periods during the am and pm peak hours, lunch, and a weekend night hour; the source and level of peak noise events would also be recorded. Identify sensitive receptors in the project vicinity, including residential, recreational, educational, and other noise/vibration-sensitive land uses. Evaluate construction-related noise and groundborne vibration attributable to excavators, bulldozers, pile drivers or vibrators, and other construction equipment required for both hotel and parking garage construction, and impacts to sensitive receptors; provide supporting data for possible impacts of vibration on adjacent historic structures. Quantify potential noise increases associated with project operation and address direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to sensitive receptors operational noise impacts (e.g., effects of traffic on existing residents). Based on the Fehr & Peers traffic study, we would identify the potential for incremental increases in ambient noise due to any project-related increases in roadway traffic volumes with attention to sensitive receptors. Identify any anticipated nuisance noise impacts on the residential units from projected traffic noise, commercial uses onsite, and cumulative impacts associated with planned and pending projects in the vicinity. Identify mitigation measures, as needed, to reduce the impacts of noise and groundborne vibration. Amec Foster Wheeler’s Noise Specialist, Brian Cook, would oversee this effort. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 35 Population and Housing: The project would incrementally increase employment opportunities in Hermosa Beach through direct addition of jobs at the hotel, restaurants, and retail uses; added visitation to the community incrementally increases employment at area retail and other businesses with associated potential for incremental population growth. Such employment and population growth could increase housing demand within the already constrained South Bay region and within the City itself. Given the likely wage levels of many of these available jobs, demand for affordable housing would also incrementally increase. Additionally, the project would involve the demolition/displacement of existing residential units in the West Bay Apartments. To address Population and Housing issues, Amec Foster Wheeler would: Draw upon the City’s Housing Element, most recently adopted Regional Housing Needs Allocation, and other sources to briefly describe the City existing housing stock, population base, and projected growth to provide context for discussion in this section. Provide an overview of existing City policies regarding population and housing, particularly housing element goals for provision of additional housing and creation of a more diverse housing stock, and how these goals and policies compare with available City economic development and employment objectives. Review the project’s potential for creation of both adverse and beneficial impacts to Population and Housing, including potential for residential displacement, growth inducement, substantial increases in low and moderate income workforce, the balance with increases in workforce and affordable housing, and any secondary impacts, such as increased demand for police or fire protection services or public schools (see also Public Services). Describe cumulative impacts associated with planned and pending projects. Identify any required mitigation measures to address population and housing impacts accounting for existing City policies, standards, and programs to ensure that the project remains within the overall Housing element projections and is consistent with key goals, objectives, and policies. Amec Foster Wheeler’s senior land use planner, Ms. Erika Leachman, would oversee this effort. Public Services: Over time, replacement of one-story retail building with a two-story hotel building and commercial uses would increase demand for public services provided by the City. Based upon an initial review of the E&B Oil Drilling & Production Project EIR, City Police services appear to exceed standards, but Fire Protection services appear not to meet adopted goals. Although, the addition of taller structures may require use of a ladder truck, both the cities of Redondo Beach and Torrance have ladder trucks and have entered into mutual aid agreements with Hermosa Beach, Finally, although the proposed project is a commercial use, such development could incrementally increase demand for school and park services. To address potential public service impacts, Amec Foster Wheeler would: City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 36 Summarize the status of existing public services provided by the City and area service providers, and any ongoing fiscal issues associated with provision of such services. These would include police, fire, parks, and schools. Identify increases in demand for public services, including a review of police and fire staff levels and response times, and incremental increases for school and parks services and facilities. Using accepted thresholds for the City identify potential project impacts related to increased demand for public services, particularly schools, parks, police and fire protection services. Describe cumulative impacts associated with planned and pending projects. Build upon programs and provided in the City (e.g., existing fee programs) to identify potential mitigation measures as required addressing project impacts to public services. Amec Foster Wheeler’s Senior Analyst Nick Meisinger would oversee this effort. Transportation and Parking: The project site is located within Downtown Hermosa Beach, with site access provided via 13th Court, Beach Drive, and 13th Street. Access to the project vicinity is provided by Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, with regional access provide by PCH and a number of east boulevards which link up with Interstate 405 (e.g., Aviation and Artesia Boulevards.). These regional roads all experience peak hour congestion, and multiple intersections along PCH are known to experience severe peak hour congestion, operating at level of service “F”. While Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue generally experience less peak hour congestion, the stop sign controlled intersections of Ardmore and Valley Drives with Pier Avenue can also experience vehicle delays and congestion. Further, the site is located in high demand area for coastal access and commercial parking and local access roadways (e.g., 13th Court) are narrow with limited public right of way. The proposed project would replace existing single-story retail uses with a 110-room hotel, restaurant, and commercial uses with associated potential for increases in net peak hour and average daily trip generation along with incremental increases in peak hour congestion. We understand that traffic congestion and potential for overall net increases in peak Site access is granted via Beach Drive, which connects to 13th Street (one way) and runs between Parking Garage C and Parking Lot B, the proposed location of a new parking garage. Additional site access is available at 13th Court, which serves as an alley access for business along Pier Plaza. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 37 hour trips is an issue of concern within the City, particularly for congested arterials, as well as increased demand for parking in the Downtown Core. In order to address these issues, Amec Foster Wheeler’s team would analyze transportation and parking issues as set forth below: Peer review the transportation and parking studies submitted by the applicant for the proposed project to ensure that the studies have been prepared in a manner consistent with the City’s standards. Issues that will be addressed in this review include: o Validity of the assumptions made in conducting the study, such as the trip generation estimates, trip credits for existing uses on the project site and other trip reduction credits, trip distribution assumptions, study area selection, the quality of the data used in the analysis. o Review of the methodology (e.g., volume to capacity analysis), findings of the analysis in these studies, and proposed mitigation measures in light of City and regional standards and industry practice. o Assessment of the accessibility and quality of the format, nature, and quality of the charts, figures, and other exhibits used to present the results of the study, and the adherence to the EIR standards that have been established by the City. o This review will be supplement by a site visit and new field observations by our team to confirm existing conditions as presented in the applicant’s study. o Consideration of site access issues given vicinity congestion and narrow roadways. o Sample calculations for each step of the analysis will be conducted to assess the quality of the results of the study, but not all of the calculations in the study will be checked. o Review up to four project parking alternatives including verification of input assumptions made for analyzing project parking demand such as analysis of code requirements and any assumptions for adjustments in parking demand rates and assumptions for captive trips and transit/walk-in trips. The parking study will be review based on industry practice and apparent feasibility of the proposed parking plans. Any areas of concern or needs for additional information will be identified o The results of the peer review of the applicant’s traffic and parking studies will be documented in technical memoranda, with gaps in information, issues regarding of methodology and potentially unsubstantiated conclusions identified. If the traffic analysis or parking is revised following the first round of comments, a second technical memorandum will be prepared to document the results of a second round of peer review. Based on applicant-prepared studies and associated peer review provided by our team, the Transportation and Parking section of the EIR will include: Identification of existing traffic, transit, and non-motorized (pedestrian and bicycle) facilities and assessment s, operating conditions, and constraints in the study area based on existing CEQA requirements. Based on the E&B Oil Drilling and Production Project EIR, it is presumed that the analysis will relay upon the standards within the 2010 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 38 (CMP) (Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2010) as the local beach cities do not appear to have specific adopted traffic thresholds. Existing traffic, transit, and non-motorized operational problems and congested areas will be identified. An assessment of will be made of projected operating conditions with addition of project traffic. The assessment of traffic impacts will concentrate on impacts at the study intersections as identified in the applicant’s traffic study, subject to peer review by our team. The EIR will discuss the potential effect of transit and bicycle facilities on vehicular trip reduction and possible project impacts. We will also provide a programmatic discussion of issues associated with SB 743. Appropriate mitigation measures will be identified to alleviate any negative traffic impacts thus identified. These measures may include physical mitigation and/or transportation demand management (TDM) strategies. For physical mitigation measures, potential mitigations will be examined to determine their feasibility and effectiveness, and a recommended plan will be developed. However, such potential physical improvements can also cause secondary effects such as narrower sidewalks or impacts to bicycle circulation. Recommended physical improvements from the applicant traffic study will be evaluated for such secondary effects. Cumulative impacts and any associated mitigation measures will also be addressed. Our team will ensure that potential project traffic impacts on the regional transportation system are evaluated in accordance with Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) requirements of 2010 Congestion Management Program. This will include analysis of potential impacts on CMP arterial monitoring intersections and freeway monitoring segments and on the public transit system. Mitigation measures will be developed through peer review as appropriate. Impacts to parking will be reviewed and considered in light to changes in CEQA that loss of or access to parking is not normally considered an environmental impact; however, significant impacts may be considered if impacts to coastal access parking (i.e., recreation) are found to be substantial. We will ensure that the applicants’ transportation and parking study provides a thorough assessment of alternatives. However, as permitted under CEQA, project alternatives can be evaluated to a lesser level of detail than the proposed project, generally consisting of trip generation analysis and qualitative assessment of potential impacts relative to the proposed project. Such analysis is assumed for up to three project alternatives in addition to the no project alternative. Mr. Dan Gira and Mr. Nick Meisinger would work with Fehr & Peers in constructing this analysis. The Technical Transportation and Parking Report would be provided as an appendix for the EIR. Utilities: The project site receives electric service from Southern California Edison and natural gas service from the Southern California Gas Company. The City’s Public Works Department would provide and administer storm water drainage and water quality protection. Because the project site is located in an older area of the City, existing water and sewer lines may be antiquated; potential also existing for localized drainage issues. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 39 Hermosa Beach currently receives water from the California Water Service Company (Cal Water), an investor-owned public utility that has supplied water to Hermosa Beach since 1926. Estimated historical water demand for Hermosa Beach is approximately 2,400 acre feet per year (AFY) in 2009 (City Sustainability Plan). However, projected beach cities demand is expected to increase incrementally through 2040 due to the addition of new accounts (Cal Water 2011). Water supplies for Cal Water and the City are derived from three water sources: approximately 85%-90% purchased from West Basin Municipal Water District (WBMWD), 10% to 15% from groundwater pumped from the Silverado Aquifer of the West Coast Groundwater Basin, and approximately 1% recycled water. The WBMWD water supplies are currently comprised primarily of imported surface water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), mainly derived from the Colorado River and State Water Project, and 13% recycled water (WBMWD Urban Water Management Plan, May 2011). Cal Water and West Basin plan to shift to more reliance on local sources, particularly groundwater and recycled water. Cal Water has a 4,070 AFY adjudicated right of the safe yield of the Silverado Aquifer, but does not currently have the facilities to fully utilize this supply. Cal Water intends to fully develop groundwater facilities to access their 4,070 AFY of adjudicated rights in the future, bringing groundwater to 25% to 30% of Cal Water supply (Cal Water 2010 Urban Water Management Plan). Cal Water also plans to expand recycled water supply. WBMWD is projecting to more than double current recycled water supplies by 2035 and potentially pursue over 20,000 AFY of desalinated water supply (WBMWD, 2011). MWD supplies have been fairly stable since it was formed in 1928, with only three years in which they had to reduce allocations to their member agencies: 1977, 1991, and 2009 (Muir 2014); however, regionally, surface supplies continue to be strained and MWD reliability may be strained. In order to assess the adequacy of long term water supplies and utilities issues, Amec Foster Wheeler would: Provide peer review the applicant’s proposed utility plan by Amec Foster Wheeler’s senior utilities engineer and identify gaps in information, issues regarding methodology and potentially unsubstantiated conclusions; provide analysis of the report to the City in a memorandum. Review and compile information from existing plans and studies, including any recently updated documents and describe existing utility infrastructure and service and any shortfalls or inadequacies in existing infrastructure or services, particularly the adequacy of existing water and sewer lines and storm drains serving the area. Address long-term water demand and available supply and proposed changes to and improvements in water supplies. We would calculate the estimated increase in water demand associated with the project and evaluate existing and future supplies for sufficiency to serve local and regional demands. Although the project does not meet CEQA criteria requiring a formal water supply assessment (WSA), we will provide a detailed evaluation and overview of water supplies and any potential project related or cumulative impacts. Identify increased utility demand associated with the project and potential impacts of utility infrastructure and services. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 40 Recommend any mitigation measures needed to reduce potential impacts. Amec Foster Wheeler’s Utilities Engineer Darin Miller would oversee this effort. Insignificant Issues: In order to provide a complete record for the EIR, we would provide brief discussion of issues anticipated to be insignificant including agriculture and mineral resources based on the City prepared Initial Study Checklist. Cumulative Impacts: This section will describe cumulative impacts in a manner consistent with CEQA Guidelines §15130, based on a list of projects provided by the City. As stated in the Guidelines, the nature of each environmental resource being evaluated and the type and location of the project affect whether it is included in the cumulative analysis. The individual and combined projects’ contributions to cumulative impacts will be identified. Growth Inducement: The proposed project is anticipated to have limited direct growth inducing effects. We would describe the potential growth inducting effects of increased employment and the general secondary environmental impacts associated with such growth for each project as needed. Other CEQA Sections: This section will include unavoidable effects and irreversible changes. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP): We would create a useable MMRP in table format for easy tracking, along with clearly crafted mitigation measures for each project (responsible party, required timing, relationship to each project, monitoring milestones, etc.). Our team has extensive experience translating mitigation into enforceable conditions of approval that can be easily integrated into project findings and permit conditions. These would be accompanied by clear and realistic goals for implementation, timing, and identification of potential funding sources. References: This section will list source documents, references, and agencies, and individuals consulted for the EIR. Technical Appendices: The technical appendices in the EIR will include air quality and GHG calculations, noise data, etc. The cultural resources report and visual resources study will also be included as appendices to the EIR. Also, included will be any applicant-prepared studies (i.e., the geotechnical report, historic resources report, etc.) deemed necessary to support EIR analysis and conclusions. CEQA PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH Our project management philosophy is that the best technical, cost, and schedule controls result from hands- on participation in the study effort, including public outreach and communications. We practice strict management controls in the areas of task management, scheduling, cost control and tracking, quality assurance and client communication. Our project managers see projects through from initial scoping and City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 41 costing, to final document production, assigning tasks to those best qualified to carry them out effectively and efficiently. Amec Foster Wheeler has a proven record of providing a high level of support and service to agency staff where our philosophy and business practice is to act as an extension of staff. Our project managers are required to complete a rigorous in-house training program to ensure consistency and excellence in scope, budget, and schedule management for a wide-range of projects. Additionally, our QA/QC program assures not only that our work product fulfills the project directive requirements for each task, but also that the client’s specific and unique needs are both fully-defined and met. These objectives have been accomplished by first making an across-the-board corporate commitment to the concept of quality control and assurance. Second, for each consulting contract entered into by Amec Foster Wheeler, a QA/QC responsibility is formally delegated to a qualified individual or individuals, depending on the project scope. No Task submittals would be delivered to the City without going through full technical editing and QA/QC review. For deliverables, we specialize in creating PDF files “optimized for web” to minimize file size (less than 20 MB with average size of 3MB) while retaining visual quality of the documents. All electronic documents will be broken into as many logical sections as is necessary to meet the size limitations. Amec Foster Wheeler places significant emphasis on completing projects within the established budget, and looks for ways to reduce costs throughout the life of a project. We employ a state-of-the-art intranet-based cost tracking system. The basic tools of this system are weekly electronic timesheets and weekly job cost reports. We also use project management software (Microsoft Project® and Primavera®) and periodic project reviews to monitor schedule status. The schedule will be continuously monitored to ensure the work is being performed within the established timeframes. Completion ahead of schedule is not only a measure of project management skills, but also of technical innovation and/or partnering with regulators. Amec Foster Wheeler’s team is uniquely staffed with former local agency planners with a combination of over 50 years of experience facilitating public outreach initiatives and community planning projects, including specific experience with public decision-making hearings, such as before the Planning Commission or City Council. Our team is skilled both with planning and organizing effective, well-attended, and well-managed outreach events, as well as facilitating public comment and project review in a manner that achieves the project’s objectives and public meeting regulation (e.g., the Brown Act). For the CEQA projects, we provide agendas, PowerPoint presentations, poster boards, handouts, and other materials and hosts the hearing, including public comment and meeting minutes preparation, to organize foster effective public meetings and hearings. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 42 III. PROPOSED SCHEDULE Amec Foster Wheeler has prepared a schedule to allow the City to complete this project expeditiously beginning with project kickoff task at the beginning of September 2015. We would prepare the IS and provide peer review of all available technical studies in September 2015, as well as preparation and release of the NOP for a public scoping period. We recommend an extended NOP scoping period of approximately 40 days to allow enough time for review and comment. In October, we will prepare the project description and alternatives for the EIR and organize all comments received on the NOP. Amec Foster Wheeler anticipates completion of Administrative Draft and Screencheck Draft EIR in January 2016 (accounting for the holidays). This would permit completion of the public review Draft EIR by February 2016 for review during a 60-day public review period, which would close in April 2016. The response to comments, MMRP, Findings, and Statement of Overriding Considerations would be prepared to produce the Final EIR by July 2016. Consideration of project entitlements and certification of the project EIR would commence in August 2016. We would provide planning and permit support services throughout this project timeline, from kickoff to EIR certification and project entitlements with the City. This schedule permits time for applicant responses and would provide time for potential project refinements, if needed. Our team’s preliminary schedule would deliver the EIR within the City’s desired timeframe and permit flexibility to respond to decision-maker concerns and direction. Amec Foster Wheeler is committed to meet the City’s scheduling needs and to work with staff to ensure that these goals are met. Please see the following schedule for details. Amec Foster Wheeler recognizes that a key element of maintaining an EIR schedule is timely receipt of technical studies early in the process. The project schedule can be adjusted as needed to accommodate the applicant’s technical study preparation, but delays in submittal of applicant prepared studies or reviews can materially affects schedule. To best coordinate this effort, our schedule allows for early coordination with the City to ensure delivery of available technical studies at project kickoff. IDTask NameDurationStartFinish1EIR for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project52 wksMon 9/7/15Fri 9/2/162Notice to Proceed0 wksMon 9/7/15Mon 9/7/153Kickoff Meeting1 wkMon 9/7/15Fri 9/11/154Set up project coordination tasks and begin peer reviewsavailable technical studies5 wksMon 9/7/15Fri 10/9/155Prepare Initial Study3 wksMon 9/14/15Fri 10/2/156Prepare and submit NOP3 wksMon 9/14/15Fri 10/2/157Scoping Period (~40 days) and Public Hearing5.8 wksMon 10/19/15Thu 11/26/158Prepare and submit Draft Introduction and ProjectDescription and Concept Draft Alternatives4 wksMon 10/5/15Fri 10/30/159Prepare and submit Administrative (Preliminary) Draft DEIR(includes holiday season)14 wksMon 10/12/15Fri 1/15/1610City review of Screencheck Draft EIR3 wksMon 1/18/16Fri 2/5/1611Prepare and submit Public Draft EIR2 wksMon 2/8/16Fri 2/19/1612Public Review Period (60 days) and Public Hearing9 wksMon 2/22/16Fri 4/22/1613Prepare AFEIR and Response to Comments4 wksMon 4/25/16Fri 5/20/1614City review of AFEIR and Response to Comments3 wksMon 5/23/16Fri 6/10/1615Prepare MMRP, Findings, and Statement of OverridingConsiderations (if needed)2 wksMon 6/13/16Fri 6/24/1616City review of Findings and Statement of OverridingConsiderations (if needed)2 wksMon 6/27/16Fri 7/8/1617Prepare and submit Final EIR2 wksMon 7/11/16Fri 7/22/1618Public Hearings for Final EIR certification (Dates To BeDetermined)0 wksFri 7/22/16Fri 7/22/1619Amec Foster Wheeler provides planning and permitsupport services52 wksMon 9/7/15Fri 9/2/169/77/228/238/309/69/139/209/2710/40/10/10/211/111/81/11/21/212/62/12/22/21/31/101/171/241/312/72/142/212/283/63/133/203/274/34/104/174/245/15/85/155/225/296/56/126/196/267/37/107/177/247/318/78/148/218/289/49/1SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemb2016TaskSplitProgressMilestoneSummaryProject SummaryExternal TasksExternal MilestoneDeadline Tentative Proposed Schedule to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel ProjectAmec Foster Wheeler Environment & InfrastructurePage 1Assumed Start Date: Mon 9/7/15 Date: Wed 8/5/15 City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 44 IV. PROPOSED COST SUMMARY Our team has prepared a revised cost proposal to provide a detailed description of the level of effort – by task, and within each phase of the project. Given changes to the project description as of July 2015, our team was able to reduce the proposed amount of effort required for planning support services and meeting attendance. This cost estimate is based on our 2015 Fee Schedule below, including hourly rates and other direct costs and expenses. Also, given the complexity of the project, our cost proposal includes a 10% contingency reserved for use only at the discretion of the City for additional effort as needed to address potential emerging issues through the EIR and project permitting process. Our task-based approach to cost estimation allows for project milestones to be individually scoped and isolated to facilitate understanding of the level of effort required to complete each task required by the City. For this project, the cost estimates for core tasks include the following: Table 4. Project Cost Summary Table Core Project Tasks Total Cost Estimate EIR Preparation (Tasks 1 – 6) -Includes in-person meetings coordinated with onsite work days and weekly calls with City staff. $272,905 Planning and Permitting Services (Task 7) -Includes onsite assistance and coordination with City staff. $23,625 Subtotal Project Cost $296,530 10% Project Contingency Reserve $29,653 Total Project Cost $326,183 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 2015 RATE SCHEDULE The hourly labor rates set forth below are valid from January 1, 2015 and are subject to annual revision thereafter. Amec Foster Wheeler will provide the City of Hermosa Beach thirty (30) days advance written notice of any such revisions. Professional Services The City of Hermosa Beach agrees to reimburse Amec Foster Wheeler for all hours worked by professionals at the following classifications and associated hourly labor rates. For expert witness testimony and related services in connection with litigation, the City of Hermosa Beach agrees to reimburse Amec Foster Wheeler for all hours worked by professionals at the following classifications, but at one and one half times the associated hourly labor rates. Staff Technical Skill Rate/Hour Environmental and Planning Managers Dan Gira Project Manager $170.00 Erika Leachman Deputy Project Manager $130.00 Doug McFarling QA/QC Technical Manager $150.00 Rita Bright Senior Coastal Land Use Planner $140.00 Staff Technical Skill Rate/Hour Technical Staff Members Debanik Chauduri, PhD, PE, GE Senior Geologic Engineer $170.00 Craig Stewart, PG, CHG, CEG Senior Hydrogeologist $170.00 Darin Miller, PE Public Utilities/Infrastructure $150.00 Brian Cook Noise, Vibration & Airport Specialist $130.00 Steve Ochs Air Quality Analyst $130.00 Brian Londquist Hazards and Hazardous Materials $115.00 Nick Meisinger Environmental Analyst $95.00 Julia Pujo Planning Analyst $80.00 Edgar De La Torre Staff Analyst $70.00 Matt Buggert Staff Analyst $70.00 Administrative Services The City of Hermosa Beach agrees to reimburse Amec Foster Wheeler for all hours worked by administrative staff at the following hourly labor rates. Janice Depew Word Processor $75.00 Deirdre Stites (subcontractor) Graphics $68.00 Rosann Malloch Project Administrator $120.00 Rita Samaniego Administrative Assistant $65.00 OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES The City of Hermosa Beach agrees to reimburse Amec Foster Wheeler for all other direct expenses incurred at the following rates, except as otherwise specified by Amec Foster Wheeler in its proposal: Travel Expenses: Cost plus 10% Mileage charged at $0.56 per mile Meal/Per Diem charged at $71 per day (GSA Rates for Hermosa Beach) Transportation (mileage, air travel, car rental, etc.), lodging, meals, & incidental expenses Miscellaneous Expenses: Office equipment (computers, phones, etc.), space rent, & utilities Cost plus 10% Subcontract Expenses: Cost plus 10% Supplies or services furnished to Amec Foster Wheeler in support of project activities by any supplier or firm, expect temporary agency or consultant staff charged at above hourly rates Other Direct Expenses (ODCs): Printing at $0.4 per double-sided page $0.4 per double-sided page Plotting at $3.00 per square foot $3.00 per square foot Sound Meter/Monitoring Equipment at $75.00 per day $75.00 per day Other expenses in support of project activities Cost AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. CLIENT: City of Hermosa Beach Cost Plus Time and Materials (Amec Foster Wheeler reserves the right to move budget between tasks) PROJECT:Pier and Strand Hotel Project Date of Estimate:August 5, 2015 DIRECT LABOR :TITLE NAME RATE HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT Professional Level 620 Project Manager Dan Gira $170.00 12 $2,040 4 $680 62 $10,540 34 $5,780 24 $4,080 48 $8,160 10 $1,700 194 32,980 Professional Level 615 Deputy Project Manager Erika Leachman $130.00 20 $2,600 12 $1,560 196 $25,480 80 $10,400 60 $7,800 24 $3,120 16 $2,080 408 53,040 Professional Level 618 QA/QC Technical Manager Doug McFarling $150.00 1 $150 1 $150 29 $4,350 10 $1,500 9 $1,350 0 $0 0 $0 50 7,500 Professional Level 616 Senior Coastal Land Use Planner Rita Bright $140.00 8 $1,120 0 $0 12 $1,680 0 $0 0 $0 24 $3,360 81 $11,340 125 17,500 Professional Level 621 Senior Hydrogeologist Craig Stewart $180.00 4 $720 0 $0 7 $1,260 2 $360 1 $180 0 $0 0 $0 14 2,520 Professional Level 615 Air Quality Specialist Steve Ochs $130.00 2 $260 0 $0 33 $4,290 1 $130 1 $130 0 $0 0 $0 37 4,810 Professional Level 615 Registered Geologist Debanik Chauduri $170.00 4 $680 0 $0 7 $1,190 2 $340 1 $170 0 $0 0 $0 14 2,380 Profesional Level 618 Utilities Engineer Darin Miller $150.00 4 $600 0 $0 13 $1,950 1 $150 1 $150 0 $0 0 $0 19 2,850 Professional Level 620 Hazardous Materials Specialist Brian Londquist $115.00 4 $460 0 $0 5 $575 1 $115 1 $115 0 $0 0 $0 11 1,265 Professional Level 615 Noise Analyst Brian Cook $130.00 4 $520 0 $0 25 $3,250 1 $130 1 $130 0 $0 0 $0 31 4,030 Professional Level 608 Lead Environmental Analyst Nick Meisinger $95.00 16 $1,520 0 $0 243 $23,085 12 $1,140 12 $1,140 0 $0 0 $0 283 26,885 Professional Level 604 Environmental Analyst Edgar De La Torre $70.00 40 $2,800 8 $560 208 $14,560 16 $1,120 12 $840 0 $0 0 $0 284 19,880 Professional Level 604 Planning Analyst Julia Pujo $80.00 6 $480 0 $0 54 $4,320 2 $160 0 $0 0 $0 84 $6,720 146 11,680 Professional Level 606 Environmental Analyst Matt Buggert $70.00 0 $0 0 $0 188 $13,160 16 $1,120 18 $1,260 0 $0 0 $0 222 15,540 Professional Level 609 Subcontracts/procurement Bond, Donna $95.00 3 $285 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 3 285 Professional Level 614 Project Administrator Rosann Malloch $120.00 3 $360 1 $120 5 $600 1 $120 3 $360 1 $120 1 $120 15 1,800 Administrative Level 809 Word Processing Janice Depew $75.00 0 $0 0 $0 36 $2,700 8 $600 4 $300 0 $0 0 $0 48 3,600 Administrative Level 807 Administrative Rita Samaniego $65.00 1 $65 6 $390 19 $1,235 1 $65 12 $780 1 $65 1 $65 41 2,665 TOTAL DIRECT LABOR 132 $14,660 32 $3,460 1,142 $114,225 188 $23,230 160 $18,785 98 $14,825 193 $22,025 1,945 $211,210 SUBCONTRACTORS: Fehr & Peers Transportation Study Netai Basu $17,400 $1,740 $13,920 $870 $0 $875 0 17,405 Applied EarthWorks Cultural Resources/Archeaologist Barry Price $20,894 $2,089 $16,715 $1,045 $0 $1,045 0 20,894 VIZf/x Visual Simulations & Study Robert Staehle $18,000 $1,800 $14,400 $900 $0 $900 0 18,000 Deirdre Stites - Graphics Graphics Dierdre Stites $68.00 0 $0 4 $272 82 $5,576 2 $136 1 $68 0 $0 6 $408 95 6,460 Subtotal Subcontractors 0 $5,629 4 $272 82 $50,611 2 $2,951 1 $68 0 $2,820 6 $408 95 62,759 Subcontractor Markup 10%$563 $27 0 $5,061 $295 0 $7 $282 $41 0 6,276 TOTAL SUBCONTRACTORS $6,192 4 $299 82 $55,672 2 $3,246 1 $75 0 $3,102 6 $449 95 $69,035 OTHER DIRECT COSTS: Shipping $0 $100 $195 $30 $200 $0 $50 $575 Reproduction ($110 per EIR; $50 per Response to Comments; $0.4 per color page)50 $20 250 $100 $4,060 5 $550 $3,490 100 $40 100 $40 $8,300 Noise Meter Rental ($75 per day)$0 $0 $150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150 Meals/Per Diem ($71 per day - GSA rates for Hermosa Beach)3 $213 2 $142 $284 $0 $0 4 $284 $923 Newspaper Ads Easy Reader and Daily Breeze Display/Legal Ad $500.00 $0 $0 $500 $0 $500 2 $1,000 $0 $2,000 Travel Mileage charged at $0.56 per mile $0.56 $0 $0 $168 $0 $0 3,600 $2,016 1,200 $672 $2,856 Subtotal ODCs $233 $342 $5,357 $580 $4,190 $3,056 $1,046 $14,804 ODCs Markup 10%$23 $34 $536 $58 $419 $306 $105 $1,481 TOTAL ODCs $256 $376 $5,893 $638 $4,609 $3,362 $1,151 $16,285 Office Administration 0%(labor only)Fee Waived $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (phones, office equipment, office supplies) TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE 132 $21,108 32 $4,135 1,142 $175,790 188 $27,114 160 $23,469 98 $21,289 193 $23,625 1,945 $296,530 CONTINGENCY 10%$29,653 TOTAL PROJECT WITH CONTINGENCY $326,183 © 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler -- This information is deemed by Amec Foster Wheeler to be Private and Proprietary information intended for the Client-use only. This information shall not be disclosed outside of this bid process and must be securely stored to prevent unauthorized dissemination. Final EIR & Project Decisions Task 3 Draft EIR 1 2 Kick-Off & Preliminary Work Notice of Preparation Response to Comments/ Administrative Final EIR 7 Task Task Task Task 5 TOTAL PROJECT Task Planning and Permit Support 4 6 Meetings/ Hearings Task AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. Cost Plus Time and Materials (Amec Foster Wheeler reserves the right to move budget between tasks) CLIENT: City of Hermosa Beach PROJECT:Pier and Strand Hotel Project Date of Estimate:August 5, 2015 ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EIR COST SUMMARY DIRECT LABOR :TITLE NAME RATE HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT Final EIR AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT Professional Level 620 Project Manager Dan Gira $170.00 2 $340 2 $340 1 $170 2 $340 1 $170 1 $170 2 $340 1 $170 2 $340 1 $170 1 $170 6 $1,020 2 $340 1 $170 8 $1,360 8 $1,360 41 $6,970 Professional Level 615 Deputy Project Manager Erika Leachman $130.00 3 $390 4 $520 1 $130 4 $520 2 $260 2 $260 4 $520 5 $650 3 $390 4 $520 5 $650 8 $1,040 8 $1,040 1 $130 12 $1,560 40 $5,200 106 $13,780 Professional Level 618 QA/QC Technical Manager Doug McFarling $150.00 1 $150 2 $300 1 $150 1 $150 1 $150 1 $150 1 $150 1 $150 1 $150 1 $150 1 $150 1 $150 1 $150 1 $150 4 $600 0 $0 19 $2,850 Professional Level 616 Senior Coastal Land Use Planner Rita Bright $140.00 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 12 $1,680 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 12 $1,680 Professional Level 621 Senior Hydrogeologist Craig Stewart $180.00 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 6 $1,080 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 6 $1,080 Professional Level 615 Air Quality Specialist Steve Ochs $130.00 0 $0 32 $4,160 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 32 $4,160 Professional Level 615 Registered Geologist Debanik Chauduri $170.00 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 6 $1,020 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 6 $1,020 Profesional Level 618 Utilities Engineer Darin Miller $150.00 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 12 $1,800 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 12 $1,800 Professional Level 620 Hazardous Materials Specialist Brian Londquist $115.00 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4 $460 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4 $460 Professional Level 615 Noise Analyst Brian Cook $130.00 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 24 $3,120 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 24 $3,120 Professional Level 608 Lead Environmental Analyst Nick Meisinger $95.00 0 $0 0 $0 10 $950 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 40 $3,800 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 5 $475 56 $5,320 0 $0 0 $0 80 $7,600 0 $0 191 $18,145 Professional Level 604 Environmental Analyst Edgar De La Torre $70.00 0 $0 52 $3,640 0 $0 0 $0 48 $3,360 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 44 $3,080 0 $0 40 $2,800 0 $0 0 $0 16 $1,120 0 $0 0 $0 200 $14,000 Professional Level 604 Planning Analyst Julia Pujo $80.00 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 46 $3,680 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 8 $640 54 $4,320 Professional Level 606 Environmental Analyst Matt Buggert $70.00 40 $2,800 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 40 $2,800 0 $0 0 $0 8 $560 40 $2,800 0 $0 0 $0 52 $3,640 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 180 $12,600 Professional Level 609 Subcontracts/procurement Bond, Donna $95.00 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Professional Level 614 Project Administrator Rosann Malloch $120.00 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 3 $360 3 $360 Administrative Level 809 Word Processing Janice Depew $75.00 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 24 $1,800 24 $1,800 Administrative Level 807 Administrative Rita Samaniego $65.00 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 6 $390 6 $390 TOTAL DIRECT LABOR 46 $3,680 92 $8,960 13 $1,400 7 $1,010 58 $4,960 48 $3,840 53 $5,890 65 $6,330 82 $7,640 46 $3,640 52 $4,245 71 $7,530 75 $6,970 19 $1,570 104 $11,120 89 $9,750 920 $88,535 SUBCONTRACTORS: Fehr & Peers Transportation Study Netai Basu see Project Cost Summary 0 $13,920 0 $13,920 Applied EarthWorks Cultural Resources/Archeaologist Barry Price see Project Cost Summary 0 $16,715 0 $16,715 VIZf/x Visual Simulations and Aesthetic Study Robert Staehle see Project Cost Summary 0 $14,400 0 $14,400 Deirdre Stites Graphics Dierdre Stites $68.00 2 $136 2 $136 2 $136 2 $136 2 $136 2 $136 3 $204 3 $204 2 $136 0 $0 2 $136 8 $544 4 $272 0 $0 14 $952 0 $0 48 $3,264 Subtotal Subcontractors 2 $136 2 $136 2 $136 2 $136 2 $136 2 $136 3 $204 3 $204 2 $136 0 $0 2 $136 8 $544 4 $272 0 $0 14 $952 0 $45,035 48 $48,299 Subcontractor Markup 10%$14 $14 $14 $14 $14 $14 $20 $20 $14 $0 $14 $54 $27 $0 $95 $4,504 0 $4,830 TOTAL SUBCONTRACTORS $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $224 $224 $150 $0 $150 $598 $299 $0 $1,047 $49,539 $53,129 OTHER DIRECT COSTS: Shipping $45 0 $45 Reproduction ($110 per EIR; $50 per Response to Comments; $0.4 per color page)$660 0 $660 Noise Meter Rental ($75 per day)$150 0 $150 Meals/Per Diem ($71 per day - GSA rates for Hermosa Beach)$142 0 $142 Newspaper Ads Easy Reader and Daily Breeze Display/Legal Ad $500.00 $0 0 $0 Travel Mileage charged at $0.56 per mile $0.56 $0 0 $0 Subtotal ODCs $997 0 $997 ODCs Markup 10%$100 0 $100 TOTAL ODCs $1,097 0 $1,097 Office Administration 0%(labor only)$0 $0 (phones, office equipment, office supplies) Total Direct Labor and Subcontrator Cost Estimate $3,830 $9,110 $1,550 $1,160 $5,110 $3,990 $6,114 $6,554 $7,790 $3,640 $4,395 $8,128 $7,269 $1,570 $12,167 $60,386 $142,761 © 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler -- This information is deemed by Amec Foster Wheeler to be Private and Proprietary information intended for the Client-use only. This information shall not be disclosed outside of this bid process and must be securely stored to prevent unauthorized dissemination. Public Services Transportation & Parking Utilities Other CEQA Analysis of Alternatives Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology & Water Quality Land Use & Development/ Planning Noise Population & Housing Air Quality & Greenhouse Gases TOTAL PROGRAM Aesthetics & Visual Resources Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology/ Soils Project Management & Administration City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 48 V. PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS Amec Foster Wheeler has assembled a strong team for this project consisting of professionals with unique experience addressing key requested environmental documentation services, related technical issues, and coastal planning and permitting expertise. Our team has prepared many EIRs for complex planning and development projects and is strategically composed of experienced environmental professionals led by a project management team with extensive experience in preparing legally defensible EIRs for complex projects. Our management team and transportation consultant have direct experience working together on site access and design issues, as well as analysis of vehicular congestion, multi-modal transportation, and parking for large infill development projects. Our team has managed all aspects of community planning, including public outreach, planning and permitting, alternative site designs, and mitigation programming. Our team also has substantial experience with cultural resource management and preparation of photosimulations for urban infill projects. Our team has the technical expertise to understand the Pier and Strand Hotel Project to provide the City with the required high-quality analysis to address potential project impacts. Our proposed team is familiar with the local Southern California coastal setting, important stakeholders, and key issues of concern. Our team has substantial experience working on complex EIRs and regulatory issues in coastal jurisdictions, including the Cities of Santa Monica, Malibu and Santa Barbara, including preparing EIRs for hotel and urban infill projects. Our project management team has experience working together on hotel development projects, such as the 5th and Colorado Hotel Projects EIR in the City of Santa Monica, and the Rancho Malibu Coastal Resort Hotel in the City of Malibu. Our thorough environmental impacts analysis will help inform land use decision-making for the City with clear, concise, and accessible environmental documentation. Our team is available and committed to completing the proposed scope of work in a reliable, timely, and efficient manner, as described in Section II, Project Approach. Amec Foster Wheeler’s team consists of: Dan Gira, Project Manager – Mr. Gira is responsible for overall project management, team coordination, CEQA technical adequacy, timely submission of high-quality deliverables, and budget and schedule management. Amec Foster Wheeler has substantial experience preparing EIRs for urban infill and coastal development projects, as well as providing land use planning and permitting support services to local agencies. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 49 Erika Leachman, Deputy Project Manager – Ms. Leachman is responsible for coordinating technical analysts to assure consistency with City standards, uniformity with the project-specific style guide, coordination with subconsultants and adherence to project timeline and budget. Doug McFarling, Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC Technical Manager – Mr. McFarling, an Amec Foster Wheeler senior project manager well versed in CEQA technical requirements, will provide final QA/QC for all submittals. Rita Bright, Planning and Permitting Support – Ms. Bright, who has over 25 years of experience with planning and permitting of coastal projects, including high-profile hotels, will evaluate project entitlements and oversee staff report preparation and all planning and land use analyses. Technical Experts – Our team includes in-house technical experts and project scientists with extensive experience with key issues of concern for the proposed project, including construction of hotels in beach towns. Subconsultants – We has supplemented its in-house expertise with four (4) subconsultants having direct experience with elements of this project or key issues: Fehr & Peers; Applied EarthWorks; and VIZf/x. The Amec Foster Wheeler project team organization, relationship to the City, and communication structure is depicted below. Additionally, an overview of project experience and qualifications of team members are provided below in Table 5. Resumes for all team members are provided on the enclosed CD. Relevant experience for our proposed project management team is briefly discussed below. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 50 City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 51 Table 5. Amec Foster Wheeler Key Team Member Qualifications and Specializations Name and Project Role Experience & Expertise Role on this Project Dan Gira Project Manager 30 years of CEQA public agency/consulting experience. Preparation of multiple EIRs for hotel and urban infill development projects. Experience with complex projects, addressing public concerns and providing public presentations. Expert with transportation planning and impact analysis. Responsible for team coordination and overall project management and direction. Ensure adherence to schedule and budget. Key contact with City staff and subconsultants. Responsible for technical accuracy of key analyses and policy issues. Attend and provide presentations at all public hearings and meetings. Erika Leachman Deputy Project Manager Nearly 10 years of professional environmental and land use planning experience. Experience in preparation of EIRs for infill development projects. Expert with timeline management and team coordination. Certified Amec Foster Wheeler project controller. Responsible for day-to-day project operation and team coordination Assist project manager with monitoring project timelines, deliverables, and budget. Provide initial document assembly and review of technical specialist and subcontractor work products. Provide initial round of quality control of work products. Doug McFarling QA/QC Technical Manager 20 years of experience in environmental planning. Has provided QA/QC services for dozens of environmental documents. Hands on experience providing QA/QC multiple EIRs for infill development and hotel projects. Provide final document quality control and ensure consistency with City standards and procedures. Available to assist with key EIR tasks if required. Rita Bright Planning and Permit Assistance Manager 25 years of professional planning experience. Extensive experience with permitting of coastal development projects, including major hotels. Familiar with local agency entitlement processes. Oversee all aspects of planning and permit assistance. Provide feedback on EIR land use and policy analyses. Oversee preparation of staff reports for Planning Commission and City Council. Netai Basu Senior Associate, Fehr & Peers 19 years of experience in transportation planning including 13 years with Fehr & Peers. Preparation of traffic impact studies in support of environmental documents, parking studies, master plan studies and operational studies. Oversee peer review of traffic and parking studies. Ensure that all transportation and parking analyses address all key issues. Will be available to attend key meetings and hearings. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 52 Barry Price Principal Applied EarthWorks 35 years of experience in historical and prehistoric archaeology and cultural resources management. Has managed hundreds of cultural resource investigations, including several for Amec Foster Wheeler. Oversee preparation of Cultural Resources section and ensure that all required consultation is completed. Robert Staehle Architect Vizf/x Licensed architect with 25 years of experience. Photosimulation experience with major urban infill development projects. Prepare photosimulations. Available to guide and assess feasibility of visual mitigation measures. Craig Stewart, PG, CHG, CEG Hydrogeologist 28 years professional experience in hydrogeology and environmental geology. Specialized experience in hydrogeologic investigations and site characterizations. Provide senior expert input and review for the Hydrology and Water Resources section. Darin Miller, PE Civil Engineer 11 years professional civil engineering experience. Experience with design, construction, and operation of pipelines. Oversee preparation of the Utilities and Public Infrastructure section Coordinate directly as needed with public works engineers as needed. Brian Cook Senior Noise Analyst 10 years of experience in noise analysis. Experience with noise modeling and impact analysis for wide range of projects in coastal zone. Oversee construction and long-term noise analyses. Address sensitive receptor issues. Steve Ochs, PE Air Quality Specialist 10 years air quality consulting experience. Experience with permitting compliance, energy audits and GHG emissions analysis. Oversee preparation of the Air Quality/ Greenhouse Gas Emissions section. Coordinate directly as needed with public works engineers as needed. Brian Londquist Hazardous Materials Specialist 7 years professional hazardous materials experience. Experience with hazardous materials site assessments and remediation. Oversee preparation of the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section. Provide general support for site investigation and peer review. Debanik Chauduri, PhD, PE, GE Senior Geologist 19 years professional civil engineering experience. 12 years of geotechnical experience. Experience with port, harbor, transportation, commercial, and forensic investigation experience. Oversee preparation of the Geology and Soils section. Provide general support for geological investigation and peer review. Nick Meisinger Environmental Analyst 5 years of experience in environmental planning. Experience with preparation of analyses for hotel and urban infill development projects. Provide initial data collection support. Will draft the Biological Resources, Hydrology and Water Resources, Transportation and Circulation, and Alternatives sections. Provide general support for other EIR sections as needed. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 53 PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM MEMBERS DAN GIRA - PROJECT MANAGER Mr. Gira has 30 years of public agency and consulting experience, including 20 years of public agency environmental, land use planning and management experience. As a public agency manager, he oversaw a long-range planning division with a staff of 26 professionals and an annual budget in excess of $2 million. Mr. Gira has prepared over 40 EIRs on a wide variety of projects, including those for coastal resort and urban infill hotels. As a former public agency planner, Mr. Gira’s experience also includes preparation of dozens of staff reports, general plan and ordinance amendments, drafting of new policies, and revitalization planning work, including roadway and parking reconfiguration and improvement plans. Mr. Gira’s experience includes review of the effects of new multiple-story infill development projects and preparation of detailed analysis of impacts to community character and aesthetics, historic resources, streetscapes, transportation and pedestrian mobility. He also has extensive experience in design of mitigation Julia Pujo Planning Analyst 2 years of experience in planning, including environmental analysis for coastal projects in Santa Monica and Santa Barbara. Experience with coastal development processes and permits. Prepare draft staff reports and planning analyses for project processing Provide general support for EIR land use sections as needed. Edgar De La Torre Environmental Analyst 1 year experience in environmental planning. Prepared resource area sections for several CEQA Environmental Analyses, including coastal development in Santa Monica. Provide initial data collection and support. Draft the Air Quality/GHG, Geology/Soils, Noise, Public Services, and Other CEQA sections. Provide general support for other EIR sections as needed. Matt Buggert Environmental Analyst 1 year experience in environmental planning. Prepared resource area sections for several CEQA Environmental Analyses, including coastal development in Santa Monica. Provide initial data collection and support. Draft the Aesthetics and Visual Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Population and Housing, and Utilities and Public Infrastructure sections. Provide general support for other EIR sections as needed. DAN GIRA SPECIALIZED EXPERTISE 30 years of CEQA experience Substantial experience with EIR preparation for hotels and infill development projects Familiar with the environmental setting of Hermosa Beach Expert at public presentations and balancing agendas of differing agencies and stakeholders City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 54 measures, including coordinating with agency staff in development of form-based codes or overlays needed to address impacts and guide new development. Mr. Gira’s has prepared two EIRs for hotel based mixed use infill development projects for the City of San Luis Obispo, an EIR for a major coastal resort hotel in Malibu and one for two six-story hotels in the City of Santa Monica. As such, Mr. Gira has considerable experience with assessing impacts, benefits, and tradeoffs of urban infill development and associated streetscape and circulation improvements. He also has substantial experience working in the Coastal Zone, including preparing EIRs for hotel, residential and shoreline management projects and regularly interfaces with CCC staff on such projects. Mr. Gira’s environmental clients include the Cities of Berkeley, Sunnyvale, Santa Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Oxnard, Malibu, Santa Monica, as well as Santa Barbara and San Diego Counties, the California State Lands Commission (CSLC) and Department of Parks and Recreation, the Federal Bureau of Reclamation and a number of private clients. In his role as a consultant and former local agency planner and manager, he has provided presentation at well over 400 public hearings as well as managed multiple citizen’s advisory committees and community outreach efforts. Mr. Gira will be responsible for project management and oversight, communications with the City and stakeholders, presentations at all public hearings and budgetary reporting and controls to ensure the project is delivered efficiently and accurately. ERIKA LEACHMAN – DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER Ms. Leachman has nearly 10 years of professional project management, EIR preparation, and urban land use planning experience, including comprehensive community plan and ordinance preparation. She also has substantial experience in managing long-range planning projects, including land use compatibility issues identification, circulation and accessibility assessment, opportunity and constraints analysis, plan preparation, and management of community outreach and participation. Ms. Leachman is currently serving as deputy project manager for preparation of the Downtown Specific Plan EIR and the 500 Broadway Mixed Use Development Project EIR for the City of Santa Monica. Both of these EIRs address complex environmental and planning concerns in a South Bay coastal community. As such, she is familiar with regional issues in the South Bay, such as transportation, air quality, water supply and regional planning concerns. As a former public agency planner, Ms. Leachman has managed Coastal Zone community plan preparation and a downtown revitalization project, including preparation of innovative land use policy and planning tools to enhance pedestrian connectivity, improved multi-modal connectivity and improvements to the public realm. Additionally, Ms. Leachman developed form-based code zoning standards to support mixed use ERIKA LEACHMAN SPECIALIZED EX PERTISE Nearly 10 years of professional land use planning and project management experience Extensive experience with urban land use issues, plans, and development projects Expert in public outreach and communication Certified Amec Foster Wheeler project controller and project manager City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 55 redevelopment of a 0.5-mile aging commercial corridor, including development of a new boutique hotel and a multi-modal roadway improvement project. Ms. Leachman also coordinated with the University of California regarding a campus master plan, including coordinating road, pedestrian corridor and bicycle improvements. She has also provided land use oversight and coordination for update of a major regional traffic model and development of the associated multi-modal transportation capital improvement plan. Ms. Leachman will assist Mr. Gira with day-to-day project management, monitoring project timelines, internal staff and subconsultant coordination, and for providing frequent interface with City staff. DOUG MCFARLING – QA/QC As a QA/QC technical specialist and project manager with more than 20 years of experience, Mr. McFarling has led and reviewed numerous CEQA- and NEPA- compliant documentation efforts. These include the management of more than 80 Environmental Assessments (EAs) and associated regulatory compliance efforts at Department of Defense (DOD) facilities nationwide, including EA and regulatory permit compliance efforts in Santa Barbara County and for the Chinatown Project and Garden Street Terraces Project EIRs in the City of San Luis Obispo. Mr. McFarling was the QA/QC officer for a nationwide Renewable Energy Opportunity Assessment for the US Air Force at 21 sites across the country. He has provided management assistance and QA/QC services on ten EIRs over the last several years, such as those for major urban infill development projects, including the award-winning Plan Santa Barbara General Plan Update Program EIR and the PRC 421 Oil Lease Recommissioning EIR for the CSLC. He provided QA/QC services on the Ventura Community Park EIR, a project subject to the first citizen vote that was required under Ventura County’s Save Our Agricultural Resources initiative. RITA BRIGHT – PLANNING AND PERMIT ASSISTANCE MANAGER Ms. Bright has over 25 years of environmental document and land use planning and permitting experience. As a former public agency planning manager, Ms. Bright managed all development entitlements, related legislative amendments, and environmental review within the Coastal Zone of Santa Barbara County. As such, she has drafted or managed the preparation of hundreds of staff reports for all types of projects, including development of the Bacara Resort and Spa Hotel as well as a major remodel of the Biltmore Hotel. DOUG MCFARLING SPECIALIZED EXPERTISE QA/QC experience with complex CEQA and NEPA projects in Coastal Zone Experience with QA/QC for hotel projects in downtown San Luis Obispo and Santa Monica Expert at document management and technical review. RITA BRIGHT SPECIALIZED EXPERTISE 25 years of experience in planning, with extensive urban infill and reuse project experience. Management of multiple MNDs and EIRs. Experience with preparation of hundreds of staff reports for all types of projects and Coastal Zone regulatory processes. Bureau of Land Management certified visual resource management specialist. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 56 Ms. Bright is thoroughly conversant with the local agency entitlement process, including General Plan amendments, ordinance amendments and rezone, development plans, tentative tract maps, conditional use permits and associated environmental documents. Ms. Bright specializes in design and implementation of general plan, zoning ordinance, and other legislative amendments; inter-agency coordination and collaboration; technical regional planning oversight; neighborhood compatibility and visual resources. She is noted for her attention to detail and ability to ensure preparation of high quality documents. Ms. Bright would be responsible for QA/QC, as well as preparation of the land use analysis and consistency with plans and policies. SUBCONSULTANT TECHNICAL TEAM MEMBERS To augment the technical capabilities of Amec Foster Wheeler’s staff for this project, we have included highly qualified subconsultants on our project team: Fehr & Peers will assist with the traffic impact analysis; Applied EarthWorks will provide cultural resources support; and VIZf/x will provide visual impact photosimulations and shade/shadow modeling services. Our subconsultants are thoroughly familiar with CEQA issues and all have worked with Amec Foster Wheeler on multiple complex projects as discussed below. Company overviews, team leaders, and selected projects are highlighted below. Resumes for all subconsultant team members are available on the enclosed CD. FEHR & PEERS – TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS Fehr & Peers specializes in providing transportation planning and traffic engineering services to public and private sector clients for all modes of transportation. Fehr & Peers brings specialized expertise in a full range of transportation engineering services, including: travel demand forecasting, traffic operations and simulation, intelligent transportation systems, bicycle/ pedestrian planning and design, transportation impact analysis, and traffic engineering design. The Fehr & Peers team is very knowledgeable regarding transportation issues in the South Bay in general, and in Hermosa Beach in particular due to their work on the City’s General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan rewrite. Amec Foster Wheeler and Fehr & Peers have a long history of collaboration for large land use and transportation projects, including the 5th Street and Colorado Avenue Hotel Projects EIR, Plan Santa Barbara General Plan Update Program EIR, Chinatown Project and Prefumo Creek Commons EIRs for the City of San Luis Obispo. Fehr & Peers would provide peer review of the Transportation Study, Parking Study and parking alternatives for this project. Netai Basu – Senior Associate Transportation Planner Mr. Basu has over 19 years of experience in transportation planning including 13 years with Fehr & Peers. He has participated in and managed a broad range of traffic and parking studies for public and private clients in Southern California and in Hawaii. He has prepared numerous consulting reports including traffic impact studies in support of environmental documents, parking studies, master plan studies, operational studies and special event plans. He has prepared numerous traffic impact studies for commercial, industrial, residential, City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 57 and mixed-use developments and public facilities in many parts of Southern California, including the San Pedro Waterfront at the Port of Los Angeles, several community college master plan projects, numerous development projects in Santa Monica, and two new communities in Hawaii. As part of these studies, he supervised the preparation of visual simulations for the Pico-Olympic corridor in Los Angeles, Myrtle Avenue in Monrovia, and Vincent Avenue in West Covina. He has conducted master plan studies for major public and private projects, and prepared traffic and parking management plans for special events. He has conducted parking studies for Downtown Santa Monica and the Santa Monica Civic Center, Caltech, and several hospitals, community colleges and a park & ride facility. SELECTED FEHR & PEERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE 5th Street and Colorado Avenue Hotel Projects EIR, City of Santa Monica, CA (as a subconsultant to Amec Foster Wheeler) Santa Monica Place Cinemas Traffic and Parking Study, City of Santa Monica General Plan/ Coastal Land Use Plan rewrite, City of Hermosa Beach, CA Downtown Specific Plan, City of Santa Monica, CA (as a subconsultant to Amec Foster Wheeler) Chinatown Project EIR Traffic and Parking Study, City of San Luis Obispo, CA (as a subconsultant to Amec Foster Wheeler) Farmers Field EIR Peer Review, City of Los Angeles, CA APPLIED EARTHWORKS – CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES SPECIALISTS Applied EarthWorks is one of the largest and most capable cultural resources consulting firms in California and has completed more than 1,000 projects on behalf of federal, state, and local governments and private sector clients. Amec Foster Wheeler has an established working relationship with Applied EarthWorks, having collaborated on several environmental review projects in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties. Applied EarthWorks would peer review the cultural resources/ historic structures report for this project. Barry Price, RPA – Archaeologist and Cultural Resource Specialist Mr. Price has more than 35 years of experience as a professional cultural resource manager. As vice president, principal archaeologist, and western division manager for Applied EarthWorks, Mr. Price is responsible for project administration and technical management on projects throughout the western United States. He ensures compliance with federal and state laws and regulations, and certifies the technical quality of reports and other documents. He serves as principal liaison with clients and government agencies, manages budgets and workscopes, and directs the work of technical staff and subcontractors. He also fulfills corporate administrative duties assigned by the president and board of directors. Mr. Price has worked with Amec Foster Wheeler and Mr. Gira on several complex EIRs that addressed the sometimes complex impacts and regulatory standards that guide adaptive reuse of historic structures. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 58 SELECTED APPLIED EARTHWORKS PROJECT EXPERIENCE Downtown Specific Plan, Historic Cultural Resources Assessment –Santa Monica, CA ( subconsultant to Amec Foster Wheeler) E & B Oil Field Development Project EIR, Hermosa Beach, CA Chinatown Project EIR Traffic and Parking Study, City of San Luis Obispo (as a subconsultant to Amec Foster Wheeler) Long Beach Harbor District Historical Building Inventory Brand Park Community Center Development Project – City of Los Angeles, Department of Recreation and Parks Plan Santa Barbara General Plan Update Program EIR, Santa Barbara, CA (subconsultant to Amec Foster Wheeler) VIZF/X VIZf/x is a California architecture firm providing architectural visualization and design services to its clients since 1992. VIZf/x is proud to have worked under the direction of Mr. Bob Odermatt assisting with the creation of 3D models for land use studies associated with the City of Santa Monica light rail system. The services offered include multiple methods for the communication architectural designs. These methods include computer animation, architectural illustrative illustration, photo simulations and multimedia presentations. Their services have been used to assist in obtaining governmental approvals, working with clients and agencies to describe the impact and magnitude of proposed projects and to help lay persons understand the impacts of a planned project. VIZf/x would prepare photosimulations for this project and provide feedback from a licensed architect for issues such as the design of visual resource mitigation measures (e.g., adjustments in building height or design) and the technical feasibility of such measures. VIZf/x would also be available to provide shade and shadow modeling if desired by the City. Robert Staehle Mr. Staehle is a licensed architect with over 30 years of varied experience in the architectural, engineering, and construction industries that make him well suited to the work of providing visual simulations. Having begun his career as an architect, he gained an understanding of the built environment. His education and job experience with internationally recognized land planning and architectural design firms helped to establish a diverse knowledge base that enables him to understand all aspects of the building industry and is the basis for his ability to create extremely real and accurate work projects. SELECTED VIZF/X PROJECT EXPERIENCE Garden Street Terraces Project EIR, City of San Luis Obispo. CA (as a subconsultant to Amec Foster Wheeler) 5th Street and Colorado Avenue Hotel Projects EIR, City of Santa Monica, CA (as a subconsultant to Amec Foster Wheeler) Port of Long Beach Administration Building Photographic Historical Documentation Long Beach Harbor District Historical Building Inventory Brand Park Community Center Development Project, City of Los Angeles, CA, Department of Recreation and Parks Alameda Corridor Transportation Project, Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 59 VI. COMPANY PROFILE Amec Foster Wheeler is part of Amec Foster Wheeler plc, an international engineering services company with more than 29,000 employees in 40 countries worldwide. Amec Foster Wheeler operates more than 100 offices in North America comprising more than 4,000 scientists, geologists, engineers, biologists, environmental planners, and other specialists, including 500 professionals in California. Amec Foster Wheeler operates 14 California offices, including those in Santa Barbara, Los Angeles, and Irvine that are well positioned to serve the City of Hermosa. Amec Foster Wheeler offers the combined resources of a large, global firm, but provides the responsiveness and hands-on management capabilities of a smaller, local consulting company. Amec Foster Wheeler’s California offices maintain in-house expertise in environmental, land use, transportation, and infrastructure planning, biological resource surveys, endangered species assessment, visual resource assessment, noise and air quality analysis, water resources, hazardous materials, geological and geotechnical investigations, and assistance with State and Federal permits (e.g., Clean Water Act [CWA] Section 404 and 401 permits). We specialize in the preparation of CEQA- and NEPA compliant documents, and interagency coordination and permitting for a wide range of local, state, and federal agencies. VII. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE STATEMENT Amec Foster Wheeler is well qualified to prepare the EIR for the project through our substantial experience with hotel and urban infill development projects, including recent completion of the 5th and Colorado Hotel Projects EIR for the City of Santa Monica and preparation of other EIRs for hotel and infill development projects. For the City of San Luis Obispo, we prepared two EIRs to address the impacts of construction of separate multiple story mixed use buildings with hotels in downtown. For the City of Malibu, we prepared the Rancho Malibu Coastal Resort Hotel EIR to address the impacts of a major coastal resort hotel. For the Pier and Strand Hotel Project, we are prepared to produce a thorough, objective, and legally sustainable EIR that will withstand public and agency scrutiny and permit well informed decision-making for this project. As demonstrated through past project performance, our team provides management of technical experts and subconsultants to provide for high quality environmental and policy analyses. Our team also has substantial coastal permit and policy analysis experience. Brief overviews of EIRs for several relevant Amec Foster Wheeler California Locations City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 60 complex projects completed or initiated within the last five years, including urban infill and hotel developments, larger projects and planning and permit assistance, are provided below. EXAMPLES OF HOTEL & URBAN INFILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Our team has worked together on multiple EIRs for hotels, urban infill development projects and long range plans focused on urban areas. Amec Foster Wheeler has prepared a recent EIR for two major hotels in Downtown Santa Monica, a large coastal resort hotel in the City of Malibu and two mixed use development and hotel projects in historic Downtown San Luis Obispo. As discussed further below, we have frequently coordinated with our subconsultants Fehr & Peers, Applied EarthWorks and VIZf/x on these types of projects. The following selected project examples demonstrate both our experience and that of our team for development projects likely to raise similar issues to the Pier and Strand Hotel Project. 5TH STREET AND COLORADO AVENUE HOTEL PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA Amec Foster Wheeler prepared the EIR for construction of two six- story hotels on adjacent parcels in downtown Santa Monica, near the pending Expo Light Rail Transit Line, Downtown Station and Esplanade streetscape project. The proposed project included a total of 279 rooms with ground floor retail, lounge and restaurant space along with subterranean parking for 160 cars; public improvements entailed sidewalk widening, corner plaza space and installation of new street trees. Key EIR issues included traffic congestion and alternative transportation, pedestrian and bike circulation, loss of a historic structure and changes to a potential downtown historic district, visual resources, shading and loss of solar access, climate change, land use planning, construction effects, noise and air quality. Our team prepared detailed assessment of historic structures and in the Downtown District, and used computer simulations to address possible shadow/ solar shading impacts. The final EIR was completed and the project approved in 2013; both hotels are currently under construction. Amec Foster Wheeler was teamed with both Fehr & Peers and VIZf/x on this project. “The EIR prepared by AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. of Santa Barbara, and ultimately certified by the City Council of San Luis Obispo, was a critical tool in the decision-making process for the Council…Members of staff and the public who reviewed the report were impressed with its readability, superior graphics, and thorough discussion of key technical issues.” John Mandeville, Community Development Director, City of San Luis Obispo Client Name Rachel Kwok, Project Manager City of Santa Monica Strategic & Transportation Planning 1685 Main Street, Room 212 Santa Monica, CA 90407 (310) 485-8341 Rachel.Kwok@SMGOV.NET Amec Foster Wheeler Personnel Dan Gira, Project Manager Ben Botkin, Lead Analyst City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 61 “The high quality of this EIR and AMEC’s expertise with preparation of EIRs for long range plans in urban areas and understanding of land use and transportation planning issues was central in the City’s decision in 2013 to retain AMEC to prepare the Program EIR for the Downtown Specific Plan.” Rachel Kwok, Project Manager, City of Santa Monica GARDEN STREET TERRACES PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA Amec Foster Wheeler prepared the EIR for this 1.2-acre, five-story 200,000 square foot mixed-use project with a 95-room hotel, restaurant, lounge, spa and gym and commercial and residential uses in downtown San Luis Obispo. Additional project features included street-front commercial, concurrent streetscape improvements along a historic alley, a roof top pool and lounge and use of green roofs. The project also included purchase or lease of a city owned surface parking lot, excavation of a two-level subterranean parking garage and provision of parking for both public and private uses. Key EIR issues included potential loss of historic structures, aesthetics and changes in community character, transportation and mobility, air quality, effectiveness of alternative transportation, hazardous materials, solar access, green building, pedestrian circulation, and streetscape design. Our team prepared detailed photosimulations of the project and our geologist assessed the impacts of high groundwater on subterranean parking garage construction and prepared detailed mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts. The EIR also provided detailed review of community benefits required under city ordinance (e.g., affordable housing, public space). Amec Foster Wheeler and Applied Earthworks prepared an assessment of multiple historic buildings to carefully guide adaptive reuse of structures leading to retention and reuse of key buildings, with structures of lesser value cleared for demolition. VIZf/x assisted with preparation of photosimulations and shade/ shadow analysis. The project was of substantial community interest and our team addressed a wide range of public concerns. The high quality of the EIR was praised by the City’s Planning Commission and public, and the EIR project alternatives became the basis for a major project redesign ultimately approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. Client Name and Contact Tyler Corey, Project Manager City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 781-7169 tcorey@slocity.org Amec Foster Wheeler Personnel Dan Gira, Project Manager Rita Bright, Deputy Project Manager Ben Botkin, Lead Analyst “The high quality of this EIR was praised by the City’s Planning Commission and was a key element in the City’s decision- making for this project.” Tyler Corey, City of San Luis Obispo Project Manager, Garden Street Terraces Project EIR City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 62 RANCHO MALIBU COASTAL RESORT HOTEL PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CITY OF MALIBU, CALIFORNIA Amec Foster Wheeler completed the Public raft EIR and initial response to comments for construction of a 146-room multiple story luxury resort hotel of 294,000 square feet with spa, restaurants, retail space and a four level subterranean parking structure located in Malibu’s Civic Center. Key EIR issues included traffic congestion, air quality, night lighting and scenic views hydrology and water quality, and cultural resources. Traffic congestion and safety, geology and soils, noise, fire hazards, public services and utilities were also of concern. Of particular concern was the project’s consistency with multiple City General and Local Coastal Plan policies and potential changes to community character. The project’s location within a wastewater disposal prohibition area identified by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the proposed use of an onsite “zero emissions” wastewater treatment system required detailed analysis of groundwater issues. Also of concern were the mitigation of impacts due to constrained site access, changes in community character due to the size, bulk and scale of the project, and improved pedestrian access to the City’s Civic Center. While we completed the Public Draft EIR and initial response to comments to comments in 2014, the project was placed on hold while the applicant considers community controversy, site design, appropriate approach to site development or an alternative use. Amec Foster Wheeler’s responsiveness and thorough approach to analysis work were recognized by City staff. CHINATOWN PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA Amec Foster Wheeler prepared this EIR for a 2.12-acre, 300,000 square foot six-story 90-room hotel, restaurant, lounge and spa in historic downtown San Luis Obispo. Additional project features included residential and ground floor commercial uses as well as construction of a public plaza/ walkway system. The project involved purchase or lease of a City-owned parking lot, construction of subterranean parking and provision of both public and private parking. Key EIR issues included traffic congestion and parking, aesthetics, historic structures, air quality/ GHG generation, shade/ shadows effects, changes to community character, water quality, groundwater levels, hazardous materials, and removal of street trees. Our team provided detailed photosimulations of the proposed Client Name and Contact Joyce Parker-Bozylinski, Planning Director City of Malibu 23825 Stuart Ranch Road Malibu, CA 90265 JParker- Bozylinski@malibucity.org (310) 456-2489 ext. 265 Amec Foster Wheeler Personnel Dan Gira, Project Manager Ben Botkin, Deputy Project Manager Erika Leachman, QA/QC Specialist Client Name and Contact Pam Ricci, Project Manager City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 781-7168 pricci@slocity.org Amec Foster Wheeler Personnel Dan Gira, Project Manager City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 63 project. Amec Foster Wheeler worked with Fehr & Peers to address congestion, all transportation modes, pedestrian circulation and the impacts of paseo/sidewalk design on traffic flows and pedestrian safety as well as the adequacy of parking supply in the downtown. Applied EarthWorks addressed historic and archaeological resources. The EIR was prepared concurrently with City General Plan and Community Design Guidelines to allow increased building heights in the downtown in exchange for community benefits, such as affordable housing and public space. The project was subject to very high levels of public interest and spurred creation of a new community organization, “Save Our Downtown”. Our team responded to extensive public and agency comments and the applicant’s legal team challenged the EIR’s adequacy on a number of issues. Our thorough response to substantial comments on the Draft EIR were praised by the City attorney as providing a sound basis to ensure legal defensibility of the EIR and were pivotal to certification of the EIR by the City. Amec Foster Wheeler also provided assistance in crafting the findings and statement of overriding considerations for the project. The quality of our work on the EIR was acknowledged by City staff, decision- makers and the public and the project won unanimous approval from the Planning Commission and City Council. “AMEC has consistently performed at exceptionally high levels by producing quality products consistent with City direction and within prescribed timeframes.” Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, City of San Luis Obispo City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 64 PLAN SANTA BARBARA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CITY OF SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA This EIR evaluated the impacts of the update of the City of Santa Barbara’s General Plan. Amec Foster Wheeler worked collaboratively with City staff to transform general project goals for sustainable development into a project description of sufficient detail to support EIR analysis. This iterative process fostered adjustments and refinements in the project description prior to committing resources for full-scale impact analysis in the EIR. This process was also used to inform the creation of a range of project alternatives in close coordination with the City. Key EIR issues included the impacts of a projected 40 or more new multiple story mixed use buildings in the City’s downtown on mobility and traffic congestion, air quality, human health risks of diesel particulates, jobs-housing balance and affordable housing, aesthetic impacts of new multiple-story uses near established neighborhoods, GHG generation, and the adequacy of infrastructure, utilities, and public services. We prepared a detailed assessment of impacts to the City’s long term water supply, including both surface and groundwater supplies, and addressed the effects of seawater intrusion on the City’s well field and long term changes in water supply associated with global climate change. We also address impacts of new potential hotel and harbor development along the City’s two-mile long waterfront district. The EIR incorporated a sophisticated travel demand model prepared by Fehr & Peers to assess all modes of transportation and to identify a suite of programs to minimize net new trip generation at congested intersections, particularly the effectiveness of TDM programs on congestion, energy demand, and GHG generation. Applied EarthWorks addressed cultural and historic resources. “AMEC’s preparation of a high quality EIR, which was certified in September 2010, was an important element in the City’s successful completion of this complex project.” John Ledbetter, Principal Planner, City of Santa Barbara EXAMPLES OF PLANNING AND PERMIT ASSISTANCE PROJECTS Our team has substantial experience with permitting projects within the Coastal Zone. Our permit support for the City would be overseen by Ms. Bright, former manager of all coastal permitting for Santa Barbara County Client Name and Contact John Ledbetter, Principal Planner City of Santa Barbara Community Development Department 630 Garden Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (805) 564-5470 jledbetter@SantaBarbara.CA.gov Amec Foster Wheeler Personnel Dan Gira, Project Manager Rita Bright, Deputy Project Manager Ben Botkin, Lead Analyst City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 65 (refer to Section 5, Project Team Qualifications). Selected examples of Amec Foster Wheeler’s planning and permit assistance projects are set forth below. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING ASSISTANCE, LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CA Amec Foster Wheeler prepared and Environmental Assessment and performed Federal Coastal Zone Management Act-compliant Coastal Zone Consistency Determination services for Los Angeles Air Force Base. The proposed project involved a slope stabilization project at Fort MacArthur within the State Coastal Zone. We prepared all NEPA-compliant environmental documentation and worked with Los Angles Office Coastal Commission staff to assess project compliance with coastal resource policies related to environmentally sensitive habitats, land use compatibility with adjacent coastal dependent uses of San Pedro Harbor, recreational resources, and transportation. We worked closely with Coastal Commission staff to refine and adjustment project details to ensure that a Consistency Determination could be supported and provided all policy analysis to support such a finding. CUYAMA SOLAR - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/LAND USE DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT AND SOLAR FACILITY PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND PLANNING ASSISTANCE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Amec Foster Wheeler prepared the EIR and provided planning assistance for a proposed 40-megawatt (MW) commercial solar photovoltaic (PV) system on 327 acres of agricultural land in a remote area of Santa Barbara County. Project development would entail a new 3-mile 70-kilovolt (kV) generation tie-line to distribute the project’s generated power to the Taft-Cuyama substation. We provided environmental and planning review of countywide legislative amendments to potentially permit utility-scale solar energy projects in agricultural zones within the Cuyama Rural Region and text amendments to the County’s zoning ordinance and General Plan. Our review of suggested Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinance amendments led to substantial changes to these proposals which facilitate project approval. Key EIR issues included impacts to agricultural resources, land use, visual resources, sensitive species and candidate scenic highways. Our services also included preparation of the planning findings for ordinance and Comprehensive plan consistency as well as the CEQA findings and overriding considerations. We provided feedback to and Client Name and Contact US Air Force Tel: (310) 653-5043 Shane Michael 61 CELS/CEP Flight Chief Los Angeles AFB Tel: (805) 684-5405 Amec Foster Wheeler Personnel Rita Bright, Project Manager Client Name and Contact Kevin Drude, Deputy Director County of Santa Barbara Planning & Development Department 123 E. Anapamu Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (805) 568-2519 kevin@co.santa-barbara.ca.us Amec Foster Wheeler Personnel Rita Bright, Project Manager Ben Botkin, Deputy Project Manager Doug McFarling, Quality Control City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 66 support for County staff throughout the drafting of proposed General Plan and ordinance changes. The project was of great interest to both farmers in the region and alternative energy advocates and we provided support for the County at multiple public hearings. “Ms. Bright’s role in providing planning and environmental consultation services…has been very effective and collaborative. Her expertise in CEQA and the fields of renewable energy development and general planning have been instrumental in the County’s refinement of our Utility-scale Renewable Energy Project scope and analysis.” Kevin Drude, Deputy Director, Santa Barbara County Planning and Development Department DAHLIA COURT AFFORDABLE HOUSING, NEPA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PERMIT SERVICES CITY OF CARPINTERIA, CALIFORNIA Amec Foster Wheeler provided environmental and permit support services for this affordable housing project. We prepared an EA for the applicant and Santa Barbara County to expedite receipt of federal funds, provided assistance with the City of Carpinteria’s permit process as well as state and federal wetland-related permit requirements. The EA was prepared in accordance with US Housing and Urban Development Department requirements and addressed flooding, wetlands, noise, air quality, cultural and biological resources and impacts to scenic views. We worked with City of Carpinteria staff to ensure consistency between the NEPA and CEQA review and coastal development permit and policy consistency issues. Our team also obtained California Department of Fish and Wildlife permits and exceptions for permits from the US Army Corps of Engineers and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The project is now constructed and occupied. STATEMENT REGARDING LEGAL CHALLENGES Amec Foster Wheeler has not been held personally or professionally liable for any legal challenges. However, a 2013 court ruling in the Montecito Agricultural Foundation v. the Montecito Fire Protection District (MFPD), et. al. addressed a Final EIR prepared under the direction of Amec Foster Wheeler Project Manager Dan Gira. The MFPD is a public service provider that is considering fire station construction partially in response to growth planned by the County. A chief issue of concern involved impacts to agricultural resources on a residentially zoned property for which the County had previously issued a statement of overriding Client Name and Contact Ken Trigueiro People’s Self Help Housing Tel: (805) 783-4475 Amec Foster Wheeler Personnel Dan Gira, Project Manager ““Mr. Gira’s knowledge of State, County and City plans and policies has been an important factor in ushering this project forward in the planning process.” Jeannette Duncan, Executive Director, Peoples’ Self Help Housing Corporation City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 67 considerations related to loss of agricultural land. Although agricultural resources were analyzed in the EIR, the court found that EIR could not rely on previous County actions, including a rezone to residential use and issuance of overriding considerations for loss of agricultural land. Therefore, the MFPD, its legal advisors, and EIR team were reluctant to second guess County land use planning decisions and past CEQA findings in the EIR. We are working with the MFPD to fully address all issues raised in this litigation and recently published a revised Draft EIR for MFPD. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 68 VIII. REFERENCES The following project references correspond with project examples discussed in this proposal. Program EIR for Plan Santa Barbara General Plan Update, City of Santa Barbara John Ledbetter, Program Manager City of Santa Barbara Community Development Department 630 Garden Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (805) 564-5470 Amec Foster Wheeler Project Manager: Dan Gira Amec Foster Wheeler Deputy Project Manager: Rita Bright Rancho Malibu Resort Hotel Project EIR Joyce Parker-Bozylinski, Planning Director City of Malibu 23825 Stuart Ranch Road Malibu, CA 90265 JParker-Bozylinski@malibucity.org (310) 456-2489 ext. 265 Amec Foster Wheeler Project Manager: Dan Gira Amec Foster Wheeler QA/QC: Erika Leachman 5th Street and Colorado Avenue Hotel Projects EIR Rachel Kwok, Project Manager Strategic & Transportation Planning 1685 Main Street, Room 212 Santa Monica, CA 90407 (310) 485-8341 rachel.kwok@smgov.net Amec Foster Wheeler Project Manager: Dan Gira Chinatown Project EIR Pam Ricci, Project Manager City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 781-7168 pricci@slocity.org Amec Foster Wheeler Project Manager: Dan Gira Dahlia Court Affordable Housing EA and Permit Assistance Ken Trigueiro, Project Manager People’s Self Help Housing Corporation 26 E Victoria Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Tel: (805) 783-4475 Cuyama Solar Project EIR and Permit Assistance Kathy Pfeiffer, Project Manager County of Santa Barbara Planning & Development Department 123 E. Anapamu Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (805) 884-6844 kpfeifer@co.santa-barbara.ca.us Amec Foster Wheeler Project Manager: Rita Bright City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 69 IX. PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS AND CONTRACTING Amec Foster Wheeler has reviewed the City’s Professional Services Agreement template and has no requests for revisions. PROPOSAL COST ASSUMPTIONS Amec Foster Wheeler’s level-of-effort proposal and schedule to prepare the environmental documentation are based on the City’s RFP issued September 4, 2014 and communications with City staff through July 2015. We are available upon request of City staff to discuss the level of effort and schedule for deliverables. Amec Foster Wheeler’s proposal assumes that: 1. Electronic and/or hard copy versions of relevant City documents and available data, reports, and technical studies will be provided to Amec Foster Wheeler at project kickoff, including available maps, GIS data, any recent studies within the Project area, all technical prepared for the project etc. All data, reports, and studies would be preferred in one electronic deliverable, preferably one compact disc. We assume all documents and data will be fully accessible digitally (i.e., able to be searched, referenced, copied, pasted, etc.). Documents shall be provided in MS Word format or accessible PDF whenever possible. Delays in receipt of requested data or documents will cause a slip in schedule and an equitable adjustment in cost based on time and materials needed. 2. Substantive changes to the project description and/or alternatives by the City, once impact analyses have begun, will cause a slip in schedule and an equitable adjustment in cost based on time and materials needed. 3. Substantive changes to the scope of the EIR analysis by the City will cause a slip in schedule and an equitable adjustment in cost based on time and materials needed. 4. Amec Foster Wheeler is not responsible for any omission of data or analyses that are not provided or identified to Amec Foster Wheeler by the City, its representatives, or contractors. 5. Amec Foster Wheeler assumes that the project will be completed consistent with the proposed schedule. Delays of greater than two (2) months for any particular phase or task may lead to a change in costs or effort. 6. Amec Foster Wheeler reserves the right to partially bill for partially completed work where unanticipated delays or changes to Project schedule occur in no fault of Amec Foster Wheeler’s team. 7. Amec Foster Wheeler is not responsible for the accuracy, timeliness, or reliability of the applicant- prepared maps and/or graphic depictions of the project or the project area. 8. To minimize conflicting comments between City Departments, the City will consolidate department/division comments on draft documents (assumed to be in MS Word tracked changes). City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 70 9. Time to address public and agency comments on public draft documents is based on preparing responses to up to 50 discrete topic area comments generated from either agency or individual comment letters. If the responses to comments on administrative or draft documents require new data collection or additional fieldwork or analyses beyond the stated scope of work, an equitable adjustment in the cost based on time and materials needed may be necessary. 10. Amec Foster Wheeler will attend meetings or hearings: our project manager would attend up to six (6) meetings; our deputy project manager would attend up to three (3) meetings, and our senior land use planner would attend up to three (3) meetings. Amec Foster Wheeler’s Project Manager will attend additional meetings at a cost of $1,400 per meeting. 11. Subconsultants will attend meetings as indicated: Fehr & Peers two (2) meetings, and VIZf/x one (1) meeting. All subconsultants and/or Amec Foster Wheeler technical specialists are available to attend additional meetings, if necessary, at an additional time and materials cost. 12. Traffic impact analysis will rely on detailed peer review the applicant-prepared traffic study. No new traffic data collection is included in this scope of work and no new traffic study will be prepared. 13. All public hearings will be recorded by City personnel for the official record. Amec Foster Wheeler will assist in preparing materials, summaries, mailing lists, and notices for staff meetings and environmental hearings or workshops. 14. Neither archaeological nor paleontological field surveys will be required. 15. The applicant’s historic structures report will be complete with sufficient detail and thoroughness for the Amec Foster Wheeler team to reach concrete conclusions regarding the historical significance of the buildings and structures present within the Project area and potential Project impacts to those resources. 16. The applicant’s historic resources report will provide a thorough assessment of potential indirect (visual) to built environment historical resources in the Project vicinity along with an assessment of potential structural impacts due to excavation, pile driving and other heavy construction activities. 17. Analysis of historic resources will be limited to peer review of the applicant prepared study and a reconnaissance level site visit. 18. Geologic, ecological, or hazardous materials surveys or detailed analyses, or requested special research are not included. Assessment for these issues will be based on existing reports, regional plans and site walkovers. If unanticipated resources are identified, Amec Foster Wheeler will prepare a supplemental scope and budget for documentation and evaluation of the resources. 19. Hydrological or utilities assessment is not included. Assessment for these issues will be based on existing reports, regional plans and site walkovers. If unanticipated hydrological resources or utilities planning issues are identified, Amec Foster Wheeler will prepare a supplemental scope and budget for documentation and evaluation of the resources. 20. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) fees or other development/permit fees are not included in proposal costs. City of Hermosa Beach Revised Proposal to Prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Pier and Strand Hotel Project August 5, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 71 21. Amec Foster Wheeler reserves the right to moves budgeted effort between Project Phases described in the Level of Effort Proposal Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0668 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 REAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FROM 2014-15 TO 2015-16, REVENUE REVISIONS RELATED TO THE REAPPROPRIATIONS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council reappropriate amounts in the attached Exhibit A to the FY 2015-16 budget and approve revenue revisions in the attached Exhibit B related to the reappropriations. Totals by fund are highlighted in the attachments. The General Fund amount is $669,492. Background: Reappropriations Budget appropriations for 2014-15 expired June 30,2015.Equipment and supplies or services must have been received by June 30th in order to be charged to the 2014-15 budget.Some departments have items or services that were budgeted in 2014-15 but were not delivered or complete by year-end. In these cases,unspent amounts for those items or projects need to be reappropriated,since they were not included in the 2015-16 budget.In the case of capital improvement projects,unspent funds are added to any amounts appropriated in the 2015-16 budget, as necessary. Revenue Revisions Related to the Reappropriations For projects funded by grants, if amounts are reappropriated, the revenue estimate needs to be budgeted as well. (See Exhibit B) Conversely, if more funds are spent the previous year, grant funds budgeted for 2015-16 need to be reduced. Analysis: The budgetary accounts will be revised to reflect the attached reappropriations and related revenue. See Exhibits A & B. Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0668 Attachments: 1. Budget Reappropriations from 2014-15 2. 2015 Revenue Related to Budget Reappropriations Respectfully Submitted by: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ 1 FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT#AMOUNT EXPLANATION GENERAL FUND (001) City Council Contract Services/Private 001-1101-4201 15,000$ Strategic Planning Services for 2015 were continued through August 2015. City Manager Contract Services/Private 001-1201-4201 20,000$ The purchase of bike racks was delayed. 001-1201-4201 10,000$ The enrollment in SCE Street Light Assessment was delayed. 001-1201-4201 7,630$ Implementation of Fiscal Transparency Software (OpenGov) is in process. 001-1201-4201 2,000$ 2014 City Manager Performance Evaluation payment is in conjunction with Strategic Planning Services, which was continued through August. Finance Administration Contract Services/Private 001-1202-4201 13,650$ System modifications for financial system and replacement of purchase order program continuing in 2015-16. Human Resources Contract Services/Private 001-1203-4201 2,225$ Class and Comp Study balance remaining. Finance Cashier Contract Services/Private 001-1204-4201 1,500$ Programming for implementation of Duncan online permit processing and interface with cash register system is in process and will be completed in 2015-16. 001-1204-4201 3,000$ Remaining conversion costs for Duncan Online Parking Permit modifications. Operating Supplies 001-1204-4305 823$ Citation notification postcards ordered, but not received in 2014-15. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2015-16 BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit A 2 FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT#AMOUNT EXPLANATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2015-16 BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit A Police Department Contract Services/Private 001-2101-4201 5,221$ Purchase of pistol air recoil, taser with cartridges, and OC canisters not completed in 2014-15. Equipment More Than $5,000 001-2101-5405 20,449$ Force Use Option Simulator/Modular Shooting Range installation not completed in 2014-15. Fire Department Contract Services/Private 001-2201-4201 1,800$ Annual Mask Fit Test was delayed. 001-2201-4201 2,000$ Testing of Electrical Sticks was delayed. 001-2201-4201 1,000$ Service to the Fire Department's small tools and machines was delayed. 001-2201-4201 1,000$ Service to the Fire Department's kitchen refrigerator was delayed. 001-2201-4201 1,000$ Compressor and ASME Bottle annual testing and service was delayed. 001-2201-4201 15,000$ The Hazard Mitigation Plan Update was delayed. 001-2201-4201 2,500$ EKG/Defibrillator Maintenance was delayed 001-2201-4201 15,000$ The Emergency Operation Plan update was delayed. 001-2201-4201 5,000$ The update and purchase of Emergency Preparedness Booklets was delayed. 001-2201-4201 9,935$ Renovations to the Emergency Operations Center were not completed in 2014-15. 001-2201-4201 5,200$ Administration of the Respiratory Protection Program was not completed in 2014-15. 3 FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT#AMOUNT EXPLANATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2015-16 BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit A Safety Gear 001-2201-4350 14,607$ Firefighter turnouts (including the ambulance operator/fire intern program) ordered, but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-4350 1,100$ Replacement firefighter turnout boots (including ambulance operator/fire intern program) ordered, but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-4350 1,800$ Firefighter safety helmets (including ambulance operator/fire intern program) ordered, but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-4350 3,600$ Replacement Firefighter Brush/Strike Team Gear ordered but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-4350 450$ Replacement of Safety Helmet Accountability Fronts was delayed in 2014-15. 001-2201-4350 900$ Purchase of Structural Firefighting Gloves was delayed in 2014-15. 001-2201-4350 340$ Purchase of Wildland Firefighting Gloves was delayed in 2014-15. 001-2201-4350 1,875$ 5 year Hydro Testing for 74 SCBA Bottle was delayed in 2014-15. 001-2201-4350 1,800$ Replacement of Wildland Firefighting Boots (7) was delayed in 2014-15. 001-2201-4350 2,205$ Blauer 9970-1 SuperShell Hi-vis Jackets (15) ordered, but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-4350 730$ Firefighter Level-4 Cut Protection Extraction/Utility Gloves (15) ordered, but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-4350 950$ Purchase of replacement of expired Kevlar Ballistic Vests was delayed in 2014-15. 001-2201-4350 300$ Purchase of Fire/Arson Investigator Polo Shirts to fit over Kevlar vests was delayed in 2014-15. 4 FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT#AMOUNT EXPLANATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2015-16 BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit A Equipment Less Than $1,000 001-2201-5401 600$ Forcible Entry Prop Building Materials ordered but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-5401 250$ Radio Mounts for new engine ordered but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-5401 500$ Domestic Water Key ordered but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-5401 160$ Tool box for new engine ordered but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-5401 400$ Double Male Fittings ordered but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-5401 720$ Gated Wyve Valve ordered but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-5401 400$ Double Female Fittings (2) ordered but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-5401 400$ Reducer Fittings/Increaser (2) ordered but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-5401 500$ Siamese Appliance ordered but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-5401 160$ Case of liquid smoke for generator ordered but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-5401 500$ Laser Measuring Device ordered but not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-5401 200$ Purchase of Helmet Storage NFPA 1901 for new Pierce Engine was delayed. 001-2201-5401 900$ Replacement of Breakaway Flats (2) on vehicles R11 and A12 were ordered and not received in 2014-15. 001-2201-5401 610$ Purchase of Nonin 8500 Pulse Oximeter- PEDS bag for vehicle E12 was delayed in 2014-15. 001-2201-5401 1,665$ Mic Kits through South Bay Regional Public Communication Authority ordered, but not received in 2014-15. 5 FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT#AMOUNT EXPLANATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2015-16 BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit A Equipment More Than $1,000 001-2201-5402 1,800$ Purchase of Pelican 9460 Remote Area Lighting System was delayed in 2014- 15. Equipment More Than $5,000 001-2201-5405 23,730$ Hydraulic "Stryker Power Pro" patient gurneys (2) ordered, but not received in 2014-15. Community Development Contract Services/Private 001-4104-4201 262,513$ Ongoing consulting for General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan. Public Works Contract Services/Private 001-3104-4201 13,235$ Ongoing traffic engineering services with Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. 001-3301-4201 3,847$ Lot A and B parking numbering project not completed in 2014-15, but will be complete in 2015-16. Equipment More Than $1,000 001-3301-5402 6,586$ Purchase of light towers for Plaza was not completed in 2014-15. Contract Services/Private 001-3304-4201 58,000$ Parking structure counting system project was delayed. Estimated completion is October 2015. Maintenance Materials 001-4204-4309 30,879$ For ongoing building maintenance needs. Contract Services/Private 001-4202-4201 15,180$ Consulting for Land Development Process and Project Review is ongoing. 001-4204-4201 7,469$ Replacement of ceiling tiles, painting of Fire Department and Fire/Police Department warehouse will be completed in 2015-16. CIP Projects CIP 14-128 Street Improvements Various 001-8128-4201 (67,455)$ Reduce budget carry forward from 14-15 due to increased project expenditures at year end. CIP 11-139 Protective Bollards 001-8163-4201 25,000$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project was not completed in 14-15. 6 FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT#AMOUNT EXPLANATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2015-16 BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit A CIP 14-402 Sewer Improvements Various Locations 001-8402-4201 44,378$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project was not completed in 14-15. CIP 12-537 South Park Phase 1 001-8537-4201 44,855$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is ongoing. CIP 12-606 Fire Station Renovation and Upgrades 001-8606-4201 10,517$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is on hold due to Fire Station structural issues. CIP 12-609 Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation 001-8609-4201 10,375$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is ongoing. CIP 14-614 Police Facilities Improvements 001-8614-4201 972$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is ongoing. CIP 14-632 Fire Tower Demolition 001-8632-4201 2,394$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is ongoing. CIP 10-661 Surf Memorial 001-8661-4201 38,559$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is ongoing. 13-664 City Facility Condition Assessment & Asbestos Report 001-8664-4201 (62,897)$ Reduce budget carry forward from 14-15 due to increased project expenditures at year end. TOTAL GENERAL FUND 669,492$ STATE GAS TAX FUND (115) CIP Projects CIP 13-128 Street Improvements Various 115-8128-4201 205,158$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is ongoing. TOTAL STATE GAS FUND 205,158$ 7 FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT#AMOUNT EXPLANATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2015-16 BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit A Founded in reimbursement bases, reserve encumbrances only CIP Project CIP 11-537 South Park Playground Improvements 121-8537-4201 (40,673)$ Reduce budget carry forward from 14-15 due to increased project expenditures at year end. (40,673)$ TOTAL PROPOSITION A OPEN SPACE FUND TYCO FUND (122) CIP Projects CIP 14-173 8th Street SR2S Improvements 122-8173-4201 13,014$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. CIP 99-631 Beach Restrooms 122-8631-4201 20,241$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is ongoing. Railings will be added in 2015-16. CIP 13-655 City Facilities ADA Transition Plan and Improvements 122-8655-4201 (213)$ Reduce budget carry forward from 14-15 due to increased project expenditures at year end. CIP 13-659 Municipal Pier Structural Repairs Phase II 122-8659-4201 10,075$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. TOTAL TYCO FUND 43,117$ Public Works Contract Services/Private 125-6101-4201 35,513$ Ongoing Basketball and Tennis Court resurfacing project extending into 15- 16. 125-6101-4201 11,480$ Drinking Fountain and Shower Replacement (Longfellow and the Strand) and purchase of reseeding equipment for South Park was delayed in 2014-15. PROPOSITION A OPEN SPACE FUND (121) PARK /REC FACILITY TAX FUND (125) 8 FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT#AMOUNT EXPLANATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2015-16 BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit A CIP Projects CIP 12-537 South Park Phase I 125-8537-4201 25,371$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. CIP 14-539 Valley Park Playground Resurface 125-8539-4201 25,265$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is ongoing. CIP 14-541 Clark Field Energy Efficient Upgrades II 125-8656-4201 (8,000)$ Reduce budget carry forward from 14-15 due to increased project expenditures at year end. CIP 11-602 Clark Field Electrical 125-8602-4201 53,064$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project was not completed because the electrical panel was not installed correctly and work was not approved by SCE. Project will be completed in 2015-16. TOTAL PARK/REC FACILITY FUND 142,693$ Community Development Block Grant Fund (CDBG) (140) CIP Project CIP 13-655 City Facilities ADA Transition Plan and Improvements 140-8655-4201 96,159$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. TOTAL CDBG FUND 96,159$ PROPOSITION C FUND (146) Public Works Contract Services/Private 146-4208-4201 39,654$ Ongoing Pavement Management Study project extending into 15-16. CIP Projects CIP 12-143 PCH-Aviation Beautification 146-8143-4201 (285,285)$ Reduce budget carry forward from 14-15 due to increased project expenditures at year end. TOTAL PROPOSITION C FUND (245,631)$ 9 FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT#AMOUNT EXPLANATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2015-16 BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit A MEASURE R FUND (147) CIP 13-128 Street Improvements- Various 147-8128-4201 45,842$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. CIP 12-143 PCH-Aviation Beautification 147-8143-4201 190,000$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. CIP 12-160 PCH Traffic Improvements 147-8160-4201 6,406$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. TOTAL MEASURE R FUND 242,248$ GRANTS FUND (150) Community Development General Plan and Coastal Plan Grant 150-4104-4201 92,672$ Ongoing work for General Plan and Coastal Plan update. Local Coastal Assistance Grant 150-4107-4201 16,460$ Ongoing work for General Plan and Coastal Plan update. Public Works Beverage Recycling Grant 150-3102-4201 12,677$ Ongoing administration of Beverage Container Recycling Program. STP-L Fund Reserve for CIP 14-168 Valley Drive Sharrows 150-8168-4201 137,208$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. West Basin Grant for CIP 13-401 Sewer Improvements- Various Locations 150-8401-4201 13,875$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is close to completion. Surf Memorial Trust for CIP 10-661 Surf Memorial 150-8661-4201 (65,181)$ Reduce budget carry forward from 14-15 due to increased project expenditures at year end. TOTAL GRANTS FUND 207,711$ 10 FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT#AMOUNT EXPLANATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2015-16 BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit A Emission Control Contract Services/Private 152-3701-4201 30,000$ The purchase of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations was delayed due to pending notification from SCE on a program that would reduce the purchase cost. TOTAL AQMD FUND 30,000$ Police Equipment More Than $5,000 153-2106-5405 26,901$ Force Use Option Simulator/Modular Shooting Range installation not completed in 2014-15. TOTAL SLES FUND 26,901$ SEWER FUND (160) Public Works Contract Services/Private 160-3102-4201 13,676$ Sewer fee implementation. 160-3102-4201 65,000$ Storm Water Study not started in FY 14-15. 160-3105-4201 1,672$ Ongoing Used Oil Recycling Program administration. CIP Project CIP 13-401 Sewer Improvements- Various 160-8401-4201 41,982$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is ongoing. CIP 14-402 Sewer Improvements- Various 160-8402-4201 14,096$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is close to completion. TOTAL SEWER FUND 136,426$ SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES (SLES) FUND (153) AQMD Fund (152) 11 FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT#AMOUNT EXPLANATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2015-16 BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit A Asset Seizure/Forfeiture Fund (170) Equipment More Than $5,000 170-2103-5405 26,445$ The Downtown Camera Project is in process and was not completed in 2014- 15. 170-2103-5405 143,436$ The installation of the Force Use Option Simulator/Modular Shooting Range was not completed in 2014-15. Anticipated project completion date is September 2015. TOTAL ASSET SEIZURE FUND 169,881$ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (301) CIP Projects CIP 04-116 Pier Ave 301-8116-4201 1,504$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. CIP 11-141 Gould Ave Street Improvements 301-8141-4201 5,950$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. CIP 13-401 Sewer Improvements- Various 301-8401-4201 87,657$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is ongoing. CIP 14-402 Sewer Improvements- Various 301-8402-4201 24,148$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is close to completion. CIP 14-502 Clark Field & Community Center Tennis Lighting 301-8502-4201 121,792$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is ongoing. CIP 14-503 Lawn Bowling Green Complex Lighting 301-8503-4201 60,000$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project was added at midyear. CIP 12-537 South Park Phase I 301-8537-4201 73,000$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Project is ongoing. 12 FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT#AMOUNT EXPLANATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2015-16 BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit A CIP 14-541 Clark Field Energy Upgrades Phase II 301-8541-4201 (5,000)$ Reduce budget carry forward from 14-15 due to increased project expenditures at year end. CIP 07-649 Community Center 301-8649-4201 2,543$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. CIP 301-664 City Facility Condition Assessment and Asbestos Report 301-8664-4201 67,897$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 439,491$ Information Technology Contract Services/Private 715-1206-4201 4,000$ Wi-Fi implementation project for City Hall was not completed in 2014-15. A few more access points need to be purchased. Equipment Less Than $1,000 715-1206-5401 16,211$ Complete 14-15 annual hardware replacement in 15-16. Equipment More Than $1,000 715-1206-5402 8,820$ Complete 14-15 annual hardware replacement in 15-16. Equipment More Than $5,000 715-1206-5405 34,988$ Complete 14-15 annual hardware replacement in 15-16. Police Department Equipment More Than $1,000 715-3302-5402 3,496$ 3 HP printers for Base 3. Project has not been completed. Vehicles 715-2101-5403 32,929$ Replacement of Polaris 4x4 and Message Trailer was delayed in 2014-15. Contract Services/Private 715-3302-4201 5,000$ Purchase and install of new carpet for Base 3 upstairs was delayed. Fire Department Contract Services/Private 715-2201-4201 669$ Apparatus Bay Doors ordered, but not received in 2014-15. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND (715) 13 FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT#AMOUNT EXPLANATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2015-16 BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit A Equipment More Than $1,000 715-2201-5402 3,150$ Purchase of BlitzFire Portable Monitor was delayed in 2014-15. 715-2201-5402 9,483$ Replacement radios and backup batteries were ordered, but not received in 2014-15. Vehicles 715-2201-5403 42,242$ Purchase of Manual Monitor/Defibrillator was delayed in 2014-15. Equipment More Than $5,000 715-2201-5405 1,600$ Modem Kit from Zoli ordered, but not received in 2014-15. Sewer Division Vehicles 715-3102-5403 52,369$ Ford F350 was ordered, but not received in 2014-15. 715-3102-5403 201,460$ Volvo L90G Crawler was ordered, but not received in 2014-15. Building Maintenance Division Contract Services- Private 715-4204-4201 221,485$ Ongoing Civic Center maintenance including storage building for Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and A/C controls. Equipment More Than $1,000 715-4204-5402 159,265$ Rebroadcast equipment replacement is in process. Improvements Other Than Buildings 715-4204-5602 3,137$ A/C unit for PD Server Room is in process. Community Development Contract Services/Private 715-4201-4201 420,427$ Implementation of permit software upgrade from Permit Plus to Acela Automation (AA). Project is in progress. CIP Projects CIP 13-8656 Citywide Energy Conservation 715-8656-4201 340,805$ Increase budget carry forward from 14-15 due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. 1,561,536$ TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND (715) FUND/DEPARTMENT ACCOUNT# AMOUNT EXPLANATION Founded in reimbursement bases, reserve encumbrances only LA County Regional Park and Open Space Grant 121-3631 (40,673)$ Reduce grant revenue for 15-16 due to work performed on CIP 11-537 South Park Playground Improvements in 14-15. TOTAL PROPOSITION A OPEN SPACE FUND (40,673)$ Founded in reimbursement bases, reserve encumbrances only CDBG Americans with Disabilities Act Grant 140-3720 96,159$ Increase grant revenue available due to fewer project expenditures at year end for CIP 13-655 City Facilities ADA Transition Plan and Improvements than anticipated. TOTAL CDBG FUND 96,159$ GRANTS FUND (150) Community Development General Plan and Coastal Plan Update 150-3748 $ 92,672 Increase grant revenue available due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Local Coastal Assistance Grant 150-3571 $ 16,460 Increase grant revenue available due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Public Works Beverage Recycle Grant 150-3558 12,677$ Increase grant revenue for ongoing Beverage Container Program administration. West Basin Grant 150-3966 13,875$ Increase grant revenue available due to fewer project expenditures at year end than anticipated. Surf Memorial Trust 150-3970 (65,181)$ Reduce grant revenue for 15-16 due to work performed in 14-15. TOTAL GRANTS FUND (150) $ 70,503 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE RELATED TO 2015-2016 REAPPROPRIATIONS Exhibit B PROPOSITION A OPEN SPACE FUND (121) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUND (140) Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0684 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE RESOLUTIONS (City Manager Tom Bakaly) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council support the four resolutions introduced by the League of California Cities Annual Conference and provide direction to the voting delegate, Councilmember Peter Tucker, to vote YES on all four resolutions at the League Annual Business Meeting. Background and Analysis: The annual conference resolutions packet is attached. This year four resolutions have been introduced for consideration by the Annual Conference. The meeting will be held at 12:00 p.m. on Friday, October 2, 2015 in the San Jose Convention Center. 1.RESOLUTION RELATING TO LEAGUE BYLAWS AMENDMENTS REGARDING SUCCESSION OF LEAGUE OFFICES TO FILL VACANCIES Current League bylaws allow for vacancies in the office of the President to be filled by the First Vice President and for the First Vice President position to be filled by the Second Vice President. When vacancies occurred twice in recent years, the accelerated advancement of officers deprived the junior officers of adequate time to serve and develop expertise and relationships. The League Board unanimously recommends to allow the immediate past President to fill an unexpected vacancy in the office of the President for the unexpired term if the past President agrees. If the past President doesn’t agree, the current succession process would occur. 2.RESOLUTION OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CALLING FOR LEGISLATION TO PRESERVE THERAPEUTIC ENVIRONMENTS FOR GROUP HOMES AND AVOID IMPACTS OF OVERCONCENTRATING OF ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE RECOVERY AND TREATMENT FACILITIES IN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0684 Although the City of Hermosa Beach currently does not have neighborhoods with multiple rehab facilities, many cities have had multiple facilities appear “overnight” without seeking any input from local government or giving any consideration of the noise and parking impact the facility will have in a residential neighborhood. The proposed resolution calls on the Governor and the Legislature to work with the League and other stakeholders to address overconcentration of facilities and balance not-for-profit (including County) facilities and for- profit facilities in residential neighborhoods. 3.RESOLUTION OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES SUPPORTING SB 593 (MCGUIRE) AND CONTINUED LOCAL FLEXIBILITY FOR CITIES AS THEY ADDRESS NEIGHBORHOOD AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF TEMPORARY RENTALS OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS SB 593 would be beneficial to the City of Hermosa Beach because it would prohibit operators of transient residential hosting platforms from advertising residential units for tourist or transient use if such use violates any ordinance, regulation, or law within the applicable city or county that opts into its provisions, and requires the confidential quarterly reporting to the city or county of the following information (if the City or County adopts an ordinance requiring the reporting of the data): ·The address of each residential unit that was occupied for tourist or transient use during the quarterly period. ·The total number of nights the residential unit was occupied for tourist or transient use. ·The amounts paid for the occupancy of the residential unit for tourist or transient use. The resolution recognizes that the issue of temporary rentals of residential units is best overseen locally and provides local jurisdictions with the data and framework necessary to enforce local regulations. 4.RESOLUTION CALLING UPON THE GOVERNOR AND THE LEGISLATURE TO WORK WITH THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES TO ENACT LEGISLATION OR TO OTHERWISE COMPEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TO CREATE A PROGRAM TO AUTOMATICALLY PROVIDE DIRECT COMPENSATION TO ITS CUSTOMERS AFFECTED BY PROLONGED ELECTRICAL POWER OUTAGES UNDER SPECIFIED CIRCUMSTANCES It seems very reasonable to support the resolution for Southern California Edison (SCE) to compensate customers for prolonged electrical power outages especially when considering another large utility company, PG&E, compensates their customers for the same. Prolonged Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0684 electrical outages jeopardize the public safety, health and general welfare of the communities within SCE’s service area, and affects businesses. Attachments: 1. Resolutions Packet Respectfully Submitted by: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0670 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 APPROVE AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE SKECHERS DESIGN CENTER AND EXECUTIVE OFFICES PROJECT INCLUSIVE OF A PROPOSED OFFICE PROJECT IN MANHATTAN BEACH (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: Approve an amendment making changes to the Professional Services Agreement with Rincon Consultants, Inc., originally approved by Council on January 27, 2015, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Skechers Design Center and Executive Officers Project to include additional offices proposed in Manhattan Beach. Background: On January 27, 2015 Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Rincon Consultants, Inc. to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Skechers Design Center and Executive Offices Project. Several minor changes to the contract were approved on February 10, 2015. Recently, staff learned that an additional office building of 37,703 square feet has been proposed by Skechers in the City of Manhattan Beach on Sepulveda Boulevard between Duncan Avenue and Boundary Place. This is just north of the two originally-proposed buildings in Hermosa Beach. After consultation with the applicant’s team and Manhattan Beach staff, it was agreed that the combination of buildings will have area-wide impacts which cross city boundaries. Therefore, staff is proposing that the new building be added to the EIR’s project description so that the impacts of the combined buildings can be addressed as a single project. An amendment to the EIR contract with Rincon is required to accommodate the additional study. Analysis: The following changes are proposed to the agreement between the City and Rincon Consultants. The previously approved agreement amount with Rincon was $108,529. As allowed by the contract, Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0670 $5,000 was added in May to expand the scope of the EIR to include a Population and Housing section in response to comments from the public at the EIR scoping meeting. The new amendment will now add a further $55,566 to that amount to include study of the proposed building in Manhattan Beach within the EIR scope. The resulting contract total will therefore be $169,095. This amount is shown on the attached contract amendment. City staff will continue to collaborate closely with Manhattan Beach staff. The City of Hermosa Beach will remain the lead agency for the EIR. Fiscal Implications: There are no adverse fiscal implications to the City. All costs of the EIR are paid by the applicant pursuant to a Reimbursement Agreement. Attachments: 1.Amendment to Professional Services Agreement 2.Exhibit A to the Professional Services Agreement Respectfully Submitted by: Larry Lawrence Concur: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ 1 SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR PROPOSED SKECHERS DESIGN CENTER AND EXECUTIVE OFFICES PROJECT This second amendment to the AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE CONSULTING SERVICES TO THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH dated January 27, 2015 and amended February 10, 2015 (the "Agreement")is made by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corporation, located at Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Rincon Consultants, Inc., 180 North Ashwood Avenue, Ventura California, 93003, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT." I.Article 1, Consideration and Compensation, Paragraph C is amended to read as follows: “C As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT an estimated cost of One Hundred Sixty Nine Thousand and Ninety Five Dollars ($169,095) for CONSULTANT’s services, based on hourly rates and estimated expenses identified in “Exhibit A,” unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement. City Manager is additionally authorized to allow an additional amount not to exceed fifteen (15%) percent of the total estimated amount above without additional City Council authorization. Provided, however, that the City Manager is additionally authorized to allow additional amounts for photo simulations, geotechnical reports, hydrology studies, or other necessary technical studies without additional City Council authorization.” II.All other provisions of said Agreement shall remain in full and Effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment to Agreement as of the date and year first written below. RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. By: ___________________________________Date: _____________________ Title: _________________________________ THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By: ___________________________________Date: _____________________ Title: City Manager_______________________ 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________________ Michael Jenkins, City Attorney ATTEST: _______________________________________ Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk September 2, 2015 Rincon Project No. 14-01140 Ken Robertson Director, Community Development Department City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Subject: Cost Estimate to Prepare the Revised Skechers Design Center and Executive Offices Project EIR Dear Mr. Robertson: This letter provides a cost estimate to complete the Skechers Design Center and Executive Offices Project EIR based on the recent applicant-initiated changes to the project description to include the project proposed on adjacent properties in Manhattan Beach. The current project description involves the demolish of existing structures and development of a Design Center and Executive Offices with associated parking and a pedestrian bridge in the City of Hermosa Beach. The revised project description would add the demolition of existing structures and development of an additional office building and parking in the City of Manhattan Beach. For this point forward, the tasks needed to complete the process include: • Update the Initial Study and issue a revised Notice of Preparation (NOP) • Hold a new Scoping Meeting for the combined projects • Prepare a revised Administrative Draft EIR that reflects the combined projects. This step includes the following: o Revise already prepared ADEIR sections o New peer review of the applicant’s revised Traffic and Parking Study o Shade/Shadow analysis of the proposed building in Manhattan Beach ( 8 hours of Graphics at $80/hour) o Historic review and memo of the buildings to be demolished in Manhattan Beach ( 8 hours of Senior Staff II at $140/hour) • Prepare the Draft EIR • Prepare the Final EIR (including responses to comments and the MMRP) • Attend up to four public hearings on the project • Complete Noticing and Fee Processing • Complete Biological Resource No Effect Determination Request The table on the following page outlines our estimated costs to complete the EIR work program from this point forward and how much additional money will be needed beyond our current EIR budget. As indicated, we anticipate that $102,322 will be needed to complete the study. Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers Cost Estimate to Prepare Revised Skechers Design Center EIR Page 2 of 3 Because we currently have $46,756 remaining in our budget, we will need an additional $55,566 to complete the EIR work program. This would bring the overall budget to $169,095. We have augmented the budgets slightly for preparing the Draft and Final EIRs based on the level of community interest that we have seen to date. As appropriate, we will incorporate applicant- prepared technical studies for such issues as geology and hydrology as well as updated photosimulations of the project. Thanks for the opportunity to continue to work with the City on this project. If you have any questions or require additional information please contact me. Sincerely, RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. Joe Power, AICP CEP Heather Imgrund Principal Project Manager Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers Cost Estimate to Prepare Revised Skechers Design Center EIR Page 3 of 3 Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers City of Hermosa Beach Skechers Design Center EIR Revised Cost Estimate 9-2-15 $190/hr $140/hr $110/hr $80/hr $70/hr 2. Initial Study/NOP $3,300 28 2 4 20 2 3. Scoping Meetings (2 on one day)$2,720 20 6 8 4 2 4. Administrative Draft EIR 4.1 Summary $990 8 1 1 6 4.2 Introduction and Environmental Setting $910 7 1 2 4 4.3 Project Description $2,100 16 2 10 4 4.4 Environmental Impact Analysis Aesthetics $3,660 34 2 4 16 12 Air Quality $2,700 22 2 4 16 Biological Resources 1 $850 7 1 1 4 1 Cultural Resources1 $2,110 16 1 10 4 1 Geology $2,680 20 6 2 10 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions $2,480 20 2 4 14 Hazards/Hazardous Materials $1,920 16 2 2 10 2 Hydrology/Water Quality $1,920 16 2 2 10 2 Land Use/Planning $3,050 25 3 4 16 2 Noise $2,860 24 2 4 16 2 Population & Housing1 $1,840 15 2 2 10 1 Transportation/Parking (Rincon labor)$2,250 18 3 3 10 2 Utilities and Service Systems $2,860 22 4 6 10 2 4.5 Other CEQA-Required Sections $910 7 1 2 4 4.6 Alternatives (3)$4,560 38 4 8 20 6 5. Draft EIR $6,880 58 8 12 24 6 8 6. Final EIR 6.1 Responses to Comments/MMRP $8,960 68 12 20 34 2 6.2 Public Hearing Final EIR Publication $1,530 13 2 2 6 3 6.3 Final EIR Publication $930 9 2 4 3 7. Public Hearings (4)$6,600 40 20 20 Biological Resource No Effect Determination Request*$280 2 2 Noticing and Fee processing $840 8 4 4 Project Management/Coordination $5,840 40 16 16 8 Rincon Labor Total:$78,530 617 107 161 268 51 30 Additional Costs Subconsultants Fehr & Peers (Traffic and Parking Study Peer Review)$12,240 Printing IS with NOP (20 copies)$500 Admin. Draft EIR (5 copies)$300 Draft EIR (45 copies)$2,175 Admin. Final EIR (5 copies)$350 Final EIR (15 copies of Hearing FEIRl/15 copies of FEIR)$2,250 Miscellaneous Expenses $2,873 General & Administrative $3,103 Other Costs Total:$23,792 EIR Total (Rincon Labor + Other Costs):$102,322 CURRENT EIR BUDGET 113,529$ BILLING/COSTS TO DATE 66,772$ REMAINING BUDGET 46,756$ ADDITIONAL FUNDS NEEDED 55,566$ OVERALL COST WITH ADDITIONAL FUNDS 169,095$ *Assumes Rincon Biologist successful consultation with CDFW biologist to acquire No Effect Determination Form.1 - Added to existing contract through contigency funds via email authorization from Pam Townsend (4/11/15) and Larry Lawrence (5/14/15). Graphics Admin. IITasksCostTotal Labor Hours Principal I Sr. Staff II Staff IV Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0673 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 PROJECT STATUS REPORT AS OF AUGUST 31, 2015 (Public Works Director Andrew Brozyna) Recommended Action: To receive and file the Project Status Report as of August 31, 2015. Attachments: Project Status Report as of August 31, 2015 Respectfully Submitted by: Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Completion Date Project Budget Project Manager Comments Street and Highway Improvements High CIP 04-116 Pier Avenue/Hermosa Avenue to PCH Installation of new marquee for the corner of Pier Avenue and PCH 09/15/15 01/15/16 $50,000.00 Ells Freeman $50k donated by the HB Chamber of Commerce. The design has been submitted to PW and will be provided to the Chamber of Commerce of initial approval. High CIP 14-128 Street Improvements - Various Locations - Slurry 12/01/14 10/30/15 $749,468.00 Lucho Rodriguez / Brian Elkins Description: Pavement rehabilitation of streets at various locations per the Pavement Management Program Report. Design Phase 12/01/14 05/20/15 Construction Bid and Award Phase 04/30/15 07/21/15 Contract awarded to Palp,Inc. DBA Excel Paving. Contract amount is for $252,000 for slurry seal work. Remaining funds for CIP14-128 will be used in conjunction to CIP 15-129 funds for a grind and overlay project. Construction Phase -slurry seal 10/12/15 10/20/15 High CIP 15-129 Street Improvements - Various Locations _ Grind and Overlay 09/01/15 01/30/16 $1,018,000.00 Lucho Rodriguez/Brian Elkins Description: Pavement rehabilitation of streets at various locations per the Pavement Management Program Report. Design Phase 09/01/15 09/28/15 Construction Bid and Award Phase 10/01/15 10/15/15 Construction Phase 11/01/15 01/30/16 Remaining funds for CIP 15-129 will be used for a future slurry seal project CIP 11-141 Gould Avenue Street Improvements 03/30/15 07/30/15 $67,450.00 Lucho Rodriguez Description: Pavement and Sidewalk Rehabilitation of Gould Avenue/27th Street between Sepulveda Avenue and Manhattan Avenue. Conceptual Plan 03/30/15 07/30/15 Conceptual Plan Completed High CIP 12-143 PCH/Aviation Mobility Improvements 11/01/14 04/01/21 $1,300,000.00 Andrew Brozyna Description: Improvements to PCH and Aviation Blvd to turn them into Complete Streets. Improvement will include gateway signs, medians and sidewalk, street and pedestrian lighting, bus shelters and street furnishings. Pre-Design Phase 11/01/14 09/01/17 PSR 11/01/14 01/01/15 01/01/15 Metro to provide written clarification regarding funding of "Complete Streets". PAED TBD TBD Design Phase TBD TBD Complete PSR and 60% Design - Phase I TBD TBD Complete 90% Plans - Phase I TBD TBD Begin Construction - Phase I TBD TBD Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Completion Date Project Budget Project Manager Comments CIP 12-160 PCH Traffic Improvements 06/16/14 09/15/16 $235,975.00 Vince Damasse Description: Improve operational mobility on PCH (State Route 1) between Anita Street and Artesia Blvd., includes new striping, median curb extensions and revised signal timing. Design Phase (estimated completion date)06/16/14 10/30/15 $88,000.00 Staff is reviewing Caltrans comments. Permit Phase 09/29/14 01/04/16 Bid Phase 01/05/16 02/16/16 Council Award Date (tentative)02/23/16 02/23/16 Tentative Construction Phase 03/15/16 09/15/16 $216,000.00 High CIP 14-163 Protective Bollards Along the Strand 01/21/15 10/15/15 $25,000.00 Andrew Brozyna/Joel Ortiz Description: Install bollards at openings to the Strand to prevent errant vehicles from entering. Presentation of delineators to PW Commission 01/21/15 01/21/15 Presentation of delineators to PW Commission 03/18/15 03/18/15 Presentation to City Council 04/14/15 04/28/15 Presentation to Public Works Commission 05/20/15 05/20/15 Presentation to Public Works Commission 09/16/15 09/16/15 Research and Analysis determining viability and customizability of new vendor bollard marker, determination of proposed sites for installation. Final Presentation to the Public Works Commission 11/18/15 11/18/15 Council Presentation 12/08/15 12/08/15 Construction Phase TBD TBD High CIP 14-168 Sharrows 05/20/15 10/20/15 $20,000.00 Andrew Brozyna Description: Installation of sharrows, associated traffic furnishings on Monterey Blvd. and Longfellow Ave. Council Update 10/13/15 10/13/15 Traffic Eng completed study for feasibility and alternative bike routes. Construction 10/27/15 11/10/15 High CIP 14-173 8th Street Study 12/01/14 03/01/16 $140,000.00 Homayoun Behboodi Description: Improvements to provide "safe sidewalks, ADA curb access ramps on one or both sides of 8th Street for residents, improve crosswalks and improve public use. Preliminary Engineering/Design Alternatives 12/01/14 09/04/15 Completion of the design alternatives Council Presentaion 10/13/15 10/13/15 City Council to review and select conceptual designs, to be incorporated into the Preliminary Design. RFP for Design 10/14/15 01/08/16 Design Phase 02/01/2016 06/01/2016 Bid and Award construction Phase 06/01/2016 09/01/2016 Pending funding Construction Phase 10/01/2016 03/01/2016 Pending funding Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Completion Date Project Budget Project Manager Comments Sewer Improvements High CIP 13-401 Sewer Improvements - Various Locations 01/13/14 09/22/15 $269,660.00 Homayoun Behboodi Description: Engineering and Construction of sewer work required to be performed in association with and in advance of streets designated for rehabilitation for FY 13-14. Design Phase 01/13/14 03/03/14 Bid and Award Phase 03/04/14 05/26/14 Construction Phase 05/27/14 10/17/14 $339,981.00 Punch List Items 10/20/14 11/07/14 Completed Additional Work - Herondo Street Reclaimed Water Line 12/01/14 12/01/14 in project closing stage, reviewing change order billing. Construction for Additional Water Line 03/02/15 05/29/15 $138,130.00 High CIP 14-402 Sewer Improvements - Various Locations 11/17/14 10/27/15 $104,975.00 Vince Damasse Description: Engineering and Construction of sewer work required to be performed in association with and in advance of streets designated for rehabilitation for FY 14-15. Design Phase 11/17/14 02/19/15 Bid & Award Phase 02/23/15 03/24/15 Construction Phase 05/18/15 08/15/15 Construction substantially completed. Project Closeout 08/15/15 10/27/15 Project closeout in process. High CIP 15-403 Sewer Improvements - Various Locations TBD TBD $5,500,000.00 Lucho Rodriguez Description: Engineering and Construction of sewer work required to be performed in association with and in advance of streets designated for rehabilitation for FY 15-16. Design Phase TBD TBD Bid & Award Phase TBD TBD Construction Phase TBD TBD Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Completion Date Project Budget Project Manager Comments Park Improvements High CIP 14-502 Clark Field & Community Center Tennis Lighiting 04/15/15 09/30/15 $121,792.00 Ells Freeman Description: Installation of light fixtures at the Community Center ($63,904) and Clark Park ($21,088) tennis courts. The proposed light fixtures provide enhanced light levels would require more energy than the existing light fixtures. The increase in energy costs would be $608 annually. In addition, the installation of this project may require the reimbursement of $36,800 in EECDG funds received by the City for the tennis court lights installed in June 2012 at the Community Center. Tennis courts lighting upgrades are part of the existing city wide energy efficient lighting project. Work is in progress and expected to be completed by 9/30/2015. High CIP 14-503 Lawn Bowling Green Complex Lighting 08/13/15 03/15/16 $60,000.00 Joel Ortiz Description: Installation of eight light poles and fixtures at the Lawn Bowling Green Complex. Design Phase 08/27/15 11/05/15 Coordination with consultants, enhancing lighting scheme and finalizing plans and specifications. Bid & Award Phase 11/05/15 01/08/16 Construction Phase 01/15/16 03/15/16 High CIP 11-537 South Park Playground Improvement 11/12/13 10/30/15 $882,313.00 Lucho Rodriguez Description: Demolition of existing skate park and construction of a natural playground for 2-5 year olds and a 6-12 year old play area. Project under construction 80% complete. Project will be completed by the end of October 2015 Design Phase 11/12/13 09/26/14 Bid Phase 01/08/15 02/18/15 Award 03/10/15 03/10/15 Construction Phase 04/06/15 10/30/15 CIP 13-538 Citywide Park Master Plan 07/04/15 04/07/16 $143,853.00 Homayoun Behboodi Description: Update the City's 1990 Park Master Plan. RFP Phase 07/04/15 10/06/15 RFP in progress High CIP 14-539 Valley Park Playground Surface Renovation 11/03/14 12/15/15 $21,128.00 Joel Ortiz Description: Resurface existing poured rubber playground surface at Valley Park protecting the surface from UV Rays, cracks and granulation. Preliminary Phase 11/03/14 10/01/15 Determined scope of work, review of quotes from vendors Award 10/01/15 10/15/15 Construction 11/15/15 12/15/15 Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Completion Date Project Budget Project Manager Comments High CIP 14-541 Clark Field Energy Efficient Electrical Upgrades - Phase II 01/19/15 03/30/16 $222,222.00 Vince Damasse Description: Upgrade the existing poles and field lighting to increase efficiency. Project includes providing ADA accessibility to the grand stands. RFP Phase 01/19/15 03/12/15 Award Date PSA 05/26/15 05/26/15 Design Phase 05/27/15 12/15/15 Design in progress. Two ADA preliminary designs Award Date Construction (tentative)02/23/16 02/23/16 submitted by Consultant on 8/18/15. Construction Phase 03/15/16 06/30/16 Building & Safety review comments received. Design continuing based on Building & Safety comments. Public Building and Ground Improvements High CIP 13-656 Citywide Energy Efficiency Upgrades - Phase I 04/10/14 12/01/15 $723,907.80 Lucho Rodriguez Description: Conduct energy audits for all City facilities and assess areas where the City can reduce electricity and natural gas and increase efficiency of these facilities. Phase I: Consists of upgrading the lighting systems at multiple sites, including: Building Interior, Building Exterior, City-owned Street Lights and Park Lights. Construction in progress 60% completed. Phase I: Design Phase & SCE Application Process 04/10/14 09/30/14 Phase I: Bid and Award Phase 09/11/14 10/14/14 Phase I: Construction Phase 02/23/15 12/01/15 High CIP 12-609 Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation 07/15/15 03/05/18 $252,847 Homayoun Behboodi Description: Downtown Core revitalization Strategy (Hermosa Ave, Pier Plaza and Pier Head Streetscape Project). On March 10, 2015 the removal of the granite bollards and relocation of the Jazz plaques was incorporated into this project. Phase: Completion of RFP and awarding contract for conceptual design 07/15/2015 12/08/2015 Reconnaissance and Conceptual Design 12/09/2015 07/14/2016 Phase: II Design 07/14/2016 11/10/2017 Phase:III Construction 07/01/2017 03/05/2018 High CIP 13-606 Fire Station Renovation and Upgrades TBD On-Hold $10,000.00 Ells Freeman/FD Project Delayed due to FD Structural Report Description: Upgrade or repair kitchen cabinets, exterior sliding door and apparatus bay door. High CIP 15-607 Fire Station Renovation and Upgrades TBD On-Hold $209,000.00 Ells Freeman/FD Project Delayed due to FD Structural Report Description: Upgrades to Fire Station including new interior/exterior paint, replacement of first floor carpet, installation of double pane windows on second floor, reloaction of air compressor in tower into new cabinet, and kitchen cabinets Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Completion Date Project Budget Project Manager Comments CIP 14-614 Police Facilities Improvements Description:The project involves creating additional secured storage for property and evidence, consolidation of range and armory equipment, installation of new updated locks on secured doors in the police department, and storage on PD ramp. 06/04/15 06/30/16 $107,972.00 Ells Freeman / PD In-progress: wash down sink installation and floor renovations. Police lock improvements will be completed in FY 15/16. Construction 06/04/15 06/30/16 CIP 15-615 Corporate Yard Facility Description:This overall project which spreads over 5 year period, consists of the construction of a new Corporate Yard Facility to include approximately 50,000 SF of new buildings comprised of Administration, Sewer, Storage, Shops, Fleet Maintenance, and Employee Services. Site improvements will include new material bins, surface parking, and a fueling island. The new facility may potentially be located offsite from the existing yard site. The phase of work budged for FY 2015-16 will include Design of the new Yard and to begin addressing soil contamination (removal or containment). TBD TBD $50,000.00 Ells Freeman Project includes Toxic Concern Mitigation High CIP 14-632 Fire Department Tower Demolition 12/01/14 02/29/16 $226,395.00 Andrew Brozyna/Vince Damasse Description: Demolition and removal of the Fire Dept. tower and seismic upgrades to the 2nd floor addition. Complete Historic Review and Alternatives 04/24/12 08/24/15 Design 12/01/14 09/15/15 Finalize Structural Analysis 09/16/2015 10/01/2015 Council Award Date Construction (tentative)10/27/2015 10/27/2015 Relocate Police and Fire Staff 10/27/15 11/10/15 Construction 11/10/15 02/16/16 Move Staff Back to Police/Fire Building 02/16/16 02/29/16 CIP 15-634 Municipal Solar Facility Plan and Installations TBD 06/30/2016 Description: The project is soliciting proposals from solar energy service providers to design, install, finance, own, operate and maintain one or more solar photovoltaic systems at certain municipal facilities under a power purchase agreement or solar lease agreement. The City anticipates purchasing from the provider all of the energy output generated by the systems. Phase 1: RFP process for municipal solar program and financing option; select consultant: FY 15/16; Phase 2: Engineering, permitting, financing and installation of solar projects: FY 15/16 $50,000.00 Kristy Morris Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Completion Date Project Budget Project Manager Comments CIP 13-649 Community Center General Improvements - Phase I and Clark Field Electrical CIP 13-602 09/22/13 09/30/15 $229,529.00 Vince Damasse Description: On-going electrical upgrades and repairs to existing electrical systems in the Community Center and Clark Field electrical upgrades Project substantially completed; Project close out pending completion of Clark Field electrical panel punch list repair by Contractor Design Phase 09/22/13 06/11/15 Bid & Award Phase 06/12/14 07/30/14 Council Award Date 08/26/14 08/26/15 Construction Phase 11/01/14 09/22/15 Project Closeout 11/01/14 09/30/15 High CIP 13-655 City Facilities ADA Improvements 11/01/14 11/30/15 $146,159.00 Lucho Rodriguez Description: Installation of self-opening doors at the Civic Center and Clark building to comply with ADA guidline. Will upgrade 6 doors to meet ADA Design Phase 11/01/14 03/15/15 Bid and Award Phase 07/16/15 08/16/16 Re-Bid and Award Phase 08/20/15 09/22/15 Bid 3rd time 09/03/15 09/17/15 Council Award 10/13/15 10/13/15 Construction Phase 10/30/15 11/30/15 High CIP 10-661 Surfing Memorial Statue 11/10/14 10/30/15 $223,635.00 Vince Damasse Description: Installation of a surf legends memorial bronze statue in front of the Community Center. Committee Review & Commitment to Design 11/05/14 08/28/15 Design 11/10/14 03/12/15 Council Award PSA & Trust agreement 11/05/14 11/05/14 Bid & Award Construction 04/06/2015 04/23/2015 Council Construction Award date 05/12/15 05/12/15 Construction Phase 06/08/15 10/30/15 Anticipate substantial completion in late October 2015. Tentative Ribbon Cutting 11/07/15 11/07/15 High CIP 13-664 Comprehensive City Facilities Master Plan 06/17/15 09/01/15 $135,469.00 Vince Damasse Description: Assess the condition of city facilities, Seismic evaluation, asbestos/lead survey, ADA compliance/transition plan, space needs study and equipment conditions/upgrades. Study, Review and Condition Assessment 06/17/15 09/01/15 Project substantially 100% complete; Project in closeout. CIP 15-650 Community Center General Improvements - Phase III 01/01/2016 06/30/2016 $50,000.00 Joel Ortiz/Ells Freeman Description: On-going improvements to the Community Center including, Repairs to windows, doors and minor architectural. Preliminary Phase TBD TBD Determining scope of work Award TBD TBD Construction TBD TBD Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Completion Date Project Budget Project Manager Comments High CIP 15-657 City Right of Way ADA Improvements TBD TBD 238,000.00$ Joel Ortiz Description: The City Facilities ADA Improvements consists of removal and replacement non-compliant street curb ramps or sidewalk where no curb ramps exist and constructing new ramps to be in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Citywide facilities ADA assessment study will be included in the CIP13-664 City Facility Condition Assessment and Asbestos Report. Preliminary Phase TBD TBD Waiting for Final ADA Transition Plan in order to determine and finalize a scope of work. Design TBD TBD Bid & Award TBD TBD Construction TBD TBD CIP 15-660 Municipal Pier Structural Repairs - Phase III TBD TBD 333,318.00$ Vince Damasse Phase I was completed in May 2013. Phase II was completed in May 2015. Phase III will involve the replacement of existing conduit, junction boxes, connections and wiring so that the lights can be functional. The project will also eliminate the service box towards the end of the pier and create a new service connection point for the foghorn at the end of the pier. Funds remaining from FY 14/15 will be combined with this project. Scoping of project in process to prepare RFP for design. High CIP 15-665 LED Lights for Lot D 08/01/2015 10/31/2015 16,500.00$ Ells Freeman In progress: materials have been ordered and electrical layout is complete. Description: The project is designed to illuminate Lot D with LEDs. High CIP 15-667 Community Center, Plaza, and Park Improvements TBD TBD 69,688.00$ Ells Freeman Description: Relocation of Jazz and Surfer's Walk of Fame plaques and creation of a cultural monument - $15K; Modification of existing fencing and installation of additional fencing at the Community Center to prevent homeless encampment around the building - $12,459; Replacement of the marquee for the Community Theatre. The existing marquee name "Hermosa Beach Playhouse" would be changed to the official name of the Theatre - $19,348; Replacement of wood floors with vinyl tiles in Room 7, which hosts the After School and After Camp Programs - $7,976; Replacement of the wood floor with vinyl tiles in Room 12, which currently acts as the Community Theatre's Dressing Room - $5,789; Replace two water fountains, one at Sea View Park and one at Fort Lots-O-Fun Park - $4,620; Replace the water fountain at Jarvis Memorial Park with bottle filler type water fountain - $4,496 Plaza and Theater improvements that are part of this CIP are deemed high priority. Temporary fencing is in place to address the homeless encampment issue. The water fountain at Jarvis Memorial has been installed. Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Completion Date Project Budget Project Manager Comments Non-CIP Projects EV Charging Stations - Establish Parking and Fees 04/01/14 11/30/15 Kristy Morris Mini-Bike Corrals/Bike Racks 03/01/15 10/30/15 20,000.00$ Kristy Morris/Ells Freeman Bike racks have been purchased. Several bike racks have been installed along the Strand wall. PW is waiting on delivery of the remaining bike racks. Sea Level Rise Grant 07/01/14 11/30/15 50,000.00$ Kristy Morris Pavement Management Program - FY 15/16 TBD TBD Lucho Rodriguez Replace Ceiling Tiles - Police and Fire Departments TBD TBD 10,420.00$ Ells Freeman On-hold pending completion Fire Tower Demo Paint Fire Department TBD TBD 15,000.00$ Ells Freeman On-hold pending completion Fire Tower Demo Civic Center Upkeep On-going On-Going 275,485.00$ Ells Freeman 1st Floor Conference Room painting completed. Sewer Hydrojet Contract 08/01/15 TBD 126,885.00$ Ells Freeman Going out to bid 9/17/15 High String Lights on Pier Plaza Ells Freeman Stormwater Management Program and Funding Mechanism TBD TBD 65,000.00$ Andrew Brozyna CNG Fueling Options Report TBD TBD -$ Andrew Brozyna/Ells Freeman PW met with the City of Redondo Beach regarding the sharing of CNG facilities and the City. Due to the aging condition of the existing facilities sharing is not possible. Vehicle Replacement: Update Report TBD TBD -$ Andrew Brozyna/Ells Freeman Replacement of Carrier Air Conditioning Unit Controls TBD TBD 32,000.00$ Ells Freeman High Parking Counting System - Signage 01/01/15 10/04/15 58,000.00$ Joel Ortiz Construction in Progress. Document Scanning and Imaging 07/15/15 TBD 17,216.00$ Sonali Tambe/Liz Zeigler Condtion Assessment of 10 Sewer Lines 08/01/15 02/28/16 5,000.00$ Ells Freeman Street Striping 11/20/15 11/30/15 15,000.00$ Ells Freeman City Council Chambers Audio/Visual Improvements 07/01/15 03/08/16 163,780.00$ Homayoun Behboodi Includes Upgrading AV System for Council Chamber PS & E 07/01/15 09/30/15 Installation 01/08/16 03/08/2016 Supplemental testimony from H. Longacre for Consent Item-2-m of the 7-PM September 24, 2015 Regular Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting Agenda Page 1 of 5 City Clerk and City Manager's office: This is a Supplemental Testimony submitted for Consent Item 2-m of the 7-pm, September 24, 2015, Regular Hermosa Beach City Council meeting. Please include with any agenda materials packets possible and the Granicus Internet agenda postings for the meeting. Thanks. September 23, 2015 To: Hermosa Beach City Council (Carolyn Petty, Hany Fangary, Peter Tucker, Michael DiVirgilio), City Clerk, City Treasurer, City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Community Development Director, Public Works Director, Finance Director, Community Resources Department, and Contracted City Attorney From: Howard Longacre, a Hermosa Beach resident. Regarding: On Seeing Red! A PCH-and-Pier-Avenue Community Center "JumboTron" sign has mysteriously been added to the monthly "Project Status Report" as a HIGH priority capital project. Who thus is running the show? Is it being sneakily run by the HB Chamber, Mayor Carolyn Petty, or City Manager Tom Bakaly? Or is it more-properly being run by the City Council as a body? It does not seem to be the whole City Council as a body, which it is supposed to be, and with the public being well- informed and well-noticed, that is running the show. Ceremonial Mayor, Councilmembers, and others: Please consider carefully the following important matter(s). Additionally, everything contained herein are my views and opinions no matter how they may be stated. First off the monthly "project status report" needs to have the date printed on each page. Each month that it is modified it needs to have each item that is modified, so indicated. It needs to show items being deleted, flagged as TO BE REMOVED in the following month before removing them. It needs to have each item that's newly-added as indicated as being a NEW ITEM. Also the line entries are much too long to be properly viewed or printed. When printed, the text is so tiny, it is virtually unreadable. This is not rocket science. This is an important monthly document and it needs to be formatted so as to not be hiding what is going on. I have raised this issue before. Do I need to raise it each and every month? This again is an important document and is presently very difficult to use or know what is changing. Supplemental testimony from H. Longacre for Consent Item-2-m of the 7-PM September 24, 2015 Regular Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting Agenda Page 2 of 5 On page 4 of this testimony is displayed for your benefit a brand new entry which I first noted as being in this public works "Project Status Report" last month. It's the infamous "CHAMBER OF COMMERCE" garbage-JUMBOTRON from HELL that the Chamber has been wanting to have at the city's prime gateway corner of Pier-and-PCH on the Community Center law since 1988, and where now stands a text only Marquee sign. The Chamber essentially arm-twisted the city into signing a contract for their name to be on the sign essentially forever back in the late 1980s as I recall. I was there watching them weasel it over 25 years ago. The sign itself should have been torn down at the time as being little more than an eyesore of useless advertising clutter that the city staff endlessly wastes time and money sticking useless messages on and paying electricity and maintenance to keep it lit. PCH updating should itself be a High Priority project, one that should be a far-higher priority than the downtown cesspool of bars. But to sneak this Chamber Jumbotron onto the Project Status Report as itself being some kind of High Priority is outrageous. It's unneeded garbage, and no matter whom is contributing money for it. It's a pig. The chamber is trying to dress it up by giving money for it, so they can get more people into the downtown for their other garbage events. And most assuredly it will use up $50,000 of staff time to just consider it and probably already has. That City Manager Tom Bakaly and the Chamber and perhaps our new ceremonial Mayor Petty have wormed this onto the "Project Status Report" as a High Priority is just another reason I'm calling for the Council to get rid of the costly, sneaky, Tom Bakaly and all his minion assistants. He and City Attorney Jenkins are directing the Council as if the Council were a bunch of wooden dimwit puppets. Shame on these two characters that are costing the city probably a net $1 Million per year. Not to mention tens of millions that Jenkins has cost this city with his lousy counsel over all these years with the oil mess, and apparently there's to be another $2 to $3 million cost resulting from his lousy counsel. On the last page of this supplemental testimony I have again included a copy of the city's organization chart. Bakaly and Jenkins report to the council which ultimately report to the electorate. It is not in the reverse order. JUMBOTRON IS NOT NEEDED. We are in the Internet and smart phone age. People are bombarded with garbage advertising from morning to night. Enough with the Chamber using this town as a doormat to pad their so- called "non-profit" coffers and fill this town with garbage events and the running of the politics of this town, especially with their oft-appointment of officials of the HB government as their Man and Woman of the year to use as pawns to get what they want. There is no strong evidence that the sales tax from Chamber crapola has gone up in 30 years. Residential property values are the main revenue source of this town. The Chamber crapola just degrades this town and residential property values. A TRASHY JUMBOTRON is NOT NEEDED. It's the absolute lowest of priorities when streets are needing to be paved. Supplemental testimony from H. Longacre for Consent Item-2-m of the 7-PM September 24, 2015 Regular Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting Agenda Page 3 of 5 The Hermosa Chamber of Commerce is a self-serving parasite in this town. The council supposedly accepted a strings-attached "donation" (probably not even yet in the City's treasury) of $50 thousand form the Chamber toward a crapola Jumbo-Tron to trash the corner of Pier Avenue and PCH, and distract PCH drivers, and with time, result in death of a child crossing at that dangerous high traffic, poorly designed intersection. A child was killed at PCH and 16th Street a few years ago where there was no distraction of a JUMBOTRON. The surfer memorial that was supposed to be on that corner was relegated to a crappy location, all because of the CHAMBER's need greed and a trashy JUMBOTRON sign. The Chamber is representative of everything that degrades Hermosa Beach. Self-serving greed that brings nothing to the improvement of the quality of life other than token crapola intermixed with massive garbage events inundating the town with transients to fund their coffers but adding little to nothing to the city's coffers. The council should back-burner the JUMBOTRON and let the new council (of five members) decide to kill it once and for all. In any event it should not be on the Project Status Report other than perhaps as a footnote, as being "in limbo, in perpetuity". See the following page for a copy of the "Project Status Report" entry for the Pier Avenue and PCH Chamber desired JUMBOTRON from HELL. The last three months' entry or lack of entry is displayed. Supplemental testimony from H. Longacre for Consent Item-2-m of the 7-PM September 24, 2015 Regular Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting Agenda Page 4 of 5 For the latest 9/24/15 meeting the August 31, 2015 Project Status Report shows a "Pier Avenue and PCH Marquee" listed as follows with more Chamber comment. _____________________________________________________________ For the 8/25/15 meeting the July 31, 2015 Project Status Report shows a "Pier Avenue and PCH Marquee" listed as follows with a Chamber comment. _____________________________________________________________ For the 7/28/15 meeting the June 30, 2015 Project Status Report does not show an entry for a "Pier Avenue and PCH Marquee". Following on the next page is the City's organizational chart. All should study it, and especially understand that the electorate (the people) are at the top of the city's organizational chart, not Ms. Petty, not Bakaly, not Jenkins, and certainly not the 'HB Chamber of Bars and Crapola' as they have long ago become known in my mind and I believe in many if not most Hermosa residents' minds. (view city's organization chart on the next page) Supplemental testimony from H. Longacre for Consent Item-2-m of the 7-PM September 24, 2015 Regular Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting Agenda Page 5 of 5 Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0675 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO REVOKE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ON-SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 1332 HERMOSA AVENUE (THE ESTABLISHMENT) (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Planning Commission Recommended Action: The Planning Commission voted 3:2 to revoke the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) based on continuing non-compliance with their requirement to provide quarterly certified audits of the food sales ratios. Staff Recommended Alternatives: Staff recommends the following alternatives to revocation: 1.Direct staff to return with a resolution to modify the CUP conditions in a manner that further ensures bona fide restaurant use rather than nightclub/bar activities such as reduced hours of operation or reduced hours for live entertainment, prohibitions of live entertainment, or reduction of the number of televisions/video displays. 2.Direct staff to return with a resolution to modify Condition 3, which requires the applicant to submit quarterly records of food and alcohol sales audited by a Certified Public Accountant, and instead bring this Condition into alignment with recent code updates that make food sales ratio checks only an issue when other code enforcement issues exist. Background: At the meeting of June 23, Councilmembers DiVirgilio and Petty, pursuant to Section 2.52.040 of the Municipal Code initiated to review of the Planning Commission decision on June 16, 2015 to revoke the CUP for “The Establishment.” On May 19, 2015, Staff presented several options to the Planning Commission primarily related to an enforcement issue that was continuing at this location because of lack of compliance with a condition that quarterly certified reports must be provided to the City, and the related lack of cooperation with a City hired Auditor to verify compliance with this condition. The Planning Commission voted 3:2 for a revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission staff report and proceedings Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0675 can be found at these links: <http://hermosabeach.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=6&clip_id=3735&meta_id=196909> <http://hermosabeach.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=6&clip_id=3735&meta_id=196908> On March 17, 2015, the Planning Commission conducted their semi-annual review of the compliance of on-sale establishments with their conditional use permits (CUP) in accordance with the City Council's revised ‘Procedures for Reviewing On-Sale Establishments’ for the period July 1 to December 30, 2014. At that hearing, staff indicated during that period The Establishment had received one (1) noise citation and, on two (2) occasions, failed to provide quarterly records of food and alcohol sales that have been audited by a Certified Public Accountant as required under Condition 3 of the site’s Condition Use Permit (CUP) C.C. Resolution 08-6617 (Attachment 1). Cumulatively, these three (3) violations caused The Establishment to exceed the threshold for review of the current CUP conditions. The Commission gave The Establishment sixty (60) days to submit the requested audited food and alcohol records advising the business that failure to do so would trigger a public hearing at which the Commission would hold a public hearing to consider revocation or modification of the CUP. CUP Review Procedures While the “Procedures for Reviewing On-Sale Establishments” provides quantitative thresholds for bringing these establishments to the attention of the Commission, staff emphasizes that the Council is guided in its formal review by the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) addressing how the business is operating and any resulting public health, safety, welfare and land use impacts. Pursuant to Section 17.56.010 the Planning Commission and City Council have the authority to grant and review use permits. The purpose of a Conditional Use Permit is to assure that the business will be compatible with existing or potential uses within the surrounding area and to recognize and compensate for impacts relating to the business such as noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibration, odors and hazards (Section 17.56.020). The City Council/Commission may conduct a review of any on- sale establishment when grounds for review may exist pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 17.70.010 (Permits or variances may be revoked or modified) as follows: Planning Commission may, after a public hearing held in the manner prescribed in Chapter 17.68 governing variances, conditional use permits, and other land use entitlement permits, revoke or modify any permit or variance if any one of the following findings can be made:… …H. For a restaurant with on-sale alcoholic beverages, the business is not operating as a restaurant because the primary function of the operation is the sale or offering for sale of alcoholic beverages and not the sale or offering for sale of food. A food to alcohol sales ratio provides a quantitative tool to help evaluate whether the business is operating as a restaurant whose primary function is the sale or offering for sale of food, as opposed to a business whose primary purpose is the sale of alcoholic beverages. For purposes of determining whether this finding can be made, an on-sale restaurant that maintains a minimum of fifty (50) percent of the total gross sales, computed monthly, from the sale of prepared food is presumed to be a restaurant. An on-sale restaurant that does not meet these percentages has the burden of demonstrating that it operates Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 2 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0675 as a restaurant, as that term is defined in Section 17.04.050. Refusal to provide the information requested under this subsection within sixty (60) days shall be deemed prima facie evidence that the business is not operating as a restaurant. (Ord. 15-1350 §3, 2015; Ord. 10-1312 §1, 2010) Sub clauses D and G of 17.70.010 are also potentially relevant, as the permittee is not complying with all CUP conditions and that, as shown below, the conditions are found to be inadequate to mitigate potential impacts to public health and safety: D. That the permit or variance granted is being, or recently has been, exercised contrary to the terms or conditions of such approval, or in violation of any statute, ordinance, law or regulation; G. That the conditions of approval are found to be inadequate to mitigate the impacts of the use allowed by the permit, and the public health, safety and welfare merit modification of the permit. Attachment 8 contains the entire text for HBMC sections 17.04.050, 17.40.080 and 17.70.010, which were amended by City Council on April 15, 2015. Please refer to the Planning Commission staff report for the site description, surroundings, and project history. Since Jan 2012, The Establishment has been included in the Planning Commission’s review of non- compliant permittees on November 19, 2013 and January 14, 2014. While the permittee’s CPA submitted food and alcohol sales summaries for several quarters, these were not audited records, and both the auditor hired by the City Council, and the City Finance Director concluded that this this information did not constitute an audit. City staff, including the Director of Community Development and the Chief of Police, have since made repeated requests to The Establishment for more detailed Point of Sale and invoice information, as recommended by the City’s Auditor (see Attachment 7, letter dated December 3, 2014), but the permittee has failed to submit the requested information. CUP Review On March 17, 2015, the Planning Commission conducted their semi-annual review of the compliance of on-sale establishments (Attachment 5). Staff indicated that The Establishment has exceeded the threshold for review (three (3) violations). CUP violations included one (1) noise citation and, on two (2) occasions, failure to provide audited quarterly records of food and alcohol sales as required under Condition 3 of the CUP, as well as failing to provide information requested by the City’s food and alcohol sales auditor. At the March hearing, the Commission gave The Establishment sixty (60) days to submit the requested audited food and alcohol records. Since that date, the permittee has failed to submit the requested information, stating that the City’s information request was ‘unduly onerous’ and placed an undue financial burden on his business operations (see letter dated March 13, 2015). Non-Compliant Activities The City’s Community Development Enforcement Officer conducted several site visits to the premises between July 1, 2014 and May 5, 2015 (Attachment 6). The Enforcement Officer noted that, on her visit May 5, 2015, the floor layout of tables, chairs and bar seating is consistent with the approved floor plan (City Council Resolution 12-6780, Attachment 2). Since July 1, 2014, the Hermosa Beach Police Department has not filed any crime reports as a result of patrons’ behavior at the site, nor has the City’s Fire Department raised concerns regarding overcrowding. Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 3 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0675 The Enforcement Officer issued one citation on July 4, 2014, for noise disturbance due to The Establishment’s doors and windows being open during an amplified music performance, contrary to Condition 14 of the current CUP. On that date, the Officer observed patrons dancing, contrary to Condition 4 of the CUP. The Officer visited again on September 9, 2014 and observed ‘No Dancing’ signs were posted, as required under Condition 4, but on a subsequent visit, May 5, 2015, noted these signs had been removed. While the magnitude of the above non-compliant activities onsite is minor, their character does call into question whether the use is operating primarily as a bona fide restaurant or more like a nightclub and/or bar. Through various updates to the Municipal Code, the City Council has sought to reduce the intensity of on-sale uses in Downtown Hermosa, particularly those that occur after 11:00P.M., as many of these late night uses have caused negative impacts to the surrounding community, namely serious crime incidences, noise disturbance, excessive littering and so forth. Pursuant to Section 17.70.010, in order to revoke or modify a CUP the City Council must concur with Commission findings that one or more of the conditions set forth in that section exist. Per Section 17.70.010(D), the CUP granted is being, and has been, exercised contrary to the terms or conditions of approval and contrary to the objective of HBMC Section 17.40.080(B), which is ‘to reduce the potential for adverse impacts associated with late-night alcohol beverage establishments. The provision of live entertainment and on-sale alcohol, in combination with late-night hours, creates a focus on nightclub/bar activity rather than restaurant use, potentially resulting in intoxication, unrulybehavior, safety issues within and in the immediate vicinity of the site and the potential to exacerbate impacts within the downtown area, which has a high concentration of alcohol serving establishments, and which impacts law enforcement services. Recent Code Changes The City Council recently changed the definition of restaurant to no longer include a food sales ratio: Section 17.04.050 Commercial Land Use Definitions "Restaurant" means a bona fide public eating establishment (A) whose primary function is the sale or offering for sale of prepared food during all hours it is open for business, and (B) that prepares food on-site in a kitchen capable of refrigerating and preparing food from its component ingredients. City Council also affirmed the requirement for all on-sale restaurants to maintain sales records for all food and alcohol items sold: Section 17.40.080(C) On sale alcohol beverage establishment: (2) The restaurant shall maintain sales reports showing the actual items sold and price charged and invoices for all food, nonalcoholic beverages and alcohol beverages sold for the prior twelve (12) months. The Council added a new requirement that, should the City initiate CUP modification or revocation proceedings, the City may appoint a qualified auditor to review these sales records and the data systems used to generate the sales information, such as the firm appointed by City Council in February 2012: Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 4 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0675 Section 17.40.080(C) On sale alcohol beverage establishment: Should the planning commission or city council initiate a CUP modification or revocation proceeding under Section 17.70.010, the commission, or the council, may at its discretion require the subject business to provide (a) a statement of the percentage of gross sales, computed monthly, that resulted from the sale of prepared food for not longer than the prior twelve (12) months; and (b) the supporting data upon which the percentage is based. The planning commission, or city council, may also require an audit of the records of the business by a certified public accountant to determine the gross sales of food and alcohol or a forensic audit by a qualified auditor selected by the city of the information and data systems by which the information is produced.The results of these audits may be used to determine whether the grounds for modification or revocation exist. Notwithstanding the updated sales reporting requirements under Municipal Code section 17.40.080 (C), the permittee still remains in non-compliance with the existing CUP condition to provide audited quarterly accounts that show the on-sale restaurant is meeting the minimum of 50% gross sales be provided by the sale of prepared food. On March 24, 2015, the City Council, following Planning Commission recommendation, removed the HBMC definition that a ‘bona fide’ restaurant would maintain a minimum of 50% of total gross sales from the sale of prepared food. However, the Council did affirm that ‘this ratio provides a quantitative tool to help evaluation [of] whether the business is operating as a restaurant whose primary function is the sale or offering for sale of food, as opposed to a business whose primary purpose is the sale of alcoholic beverages’ (Section 17.70.010(H)): For purposes of determining whether this finding can be made, an on-sale restaurant that maintains a minimum of fifty (50) percent of the total gross sales, computed monthly, from the sale of prepared food is presumed to be a restaurant.An on-sale restaurant that does not meet these percentages has the burden of demonstrating that it operates as a restaurant, as that term is defined in Section 17.04.050. The Council went on to state in Section 17.70.010(H) that: Refusal to provide the information requested under this subsection within sixty (60) days shall be deemed prima facie evidence that the business is not operating as a restaurant. Options for Consideration The Planning Commission chose to revoke the CUP based on the compliance issues noted. However, as also noted, the magnitude of these violations is minor and other events have recently occurred that might warrant a different approach. Similar options were presented the Planning Commission. 1.Direct staff to return with a resolution to modify the CUP conditions in a manner that further ensures bona fide restaurant use rather than nightclub/bar activities such as reduced hours of operation or reduced hours for live entertainment, prohibitions of live entertainment, or reduction of the number of televisions/video displays. It is demonstrated that The Establishment is operating contrary to its approved CUP and the conditions of approval are inadequate to mitigate the impacts of the use allowed by the permit,creating potential adverse impacts to the public health, safety and welfare. While a variety of modified Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 5 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0675 conditions are available for consideration, due to the non-compliant activities onsite being minor in nature, Council has a range of possible modification options to the current CUP, all of which seek to encourage a bona fide restaurant use: Currently, the approved CUP permits hours of operation to between 7:00A.M. and 12:00 Midnightdaily, except for New Year's Eve, when the hours may be extended to 1:00 on January 1.While there are restrictions on the character of live entertainment permitted onsite, namely that it is permittedbetween 7:00 PM and 11:30 PM Thursdays through Sundays and on Federal and State holidays, Cinco de Mayo, and St Patrick's Day, it must be incidental to the main restaurant activity and thatdoors and windows remain closed during performances, there are currently no restrictions on television/video displays onsite. In the past, the Commission and Council have sought to restrict the number of televisions/video displays within an onsale restaurant as these can contribute to a sportsbar or nightclub atmosphere. As such, to reduce the likelihood of nightclub/bar-type activities onsite, the Council may consider thefollowing modifications: (a)Reduce hours of operation from 7:00A.M. to 12:00 midnight to 7:00A.M. to 11:00P.M. daily, except on New Year’s Eve when the hours may be extended to 1:00AM January 1. No change to the permission for live entertainment. (b)Prohibit live entertainment. (c)Limit live entertainment to one event per weekend, which shall cease by 11:30P.M. (d)Reduce the number of televisions/video displays. If Option 1(b) is adopted, Condition 4 of the existing CUP, which allows live entertainment, would be wholly deleted. All other Conditions currently imposed would remain unmodified and in full force and effect. 2.Direct staff to return with a resolution to modify Condition 3, which requires the applicant to submit quarterly records of food and alcohol sales audited by a Certified Public Accountant, and instead bring this Condition into alignment with recent code updates that make food sales ratio checks only issue when other code enforcement issues exist. To bring the subject site’s CUP into alignment with the updated Code standard 17.40.080(C), it may be appropriate that Condition 3 of the subject CUP be amended to remove the requirement for the permittee to submit audited quarterly accounts and, instead, require that: Condition 3: The permittee shall maintain sales reports showing the actual items sold and price charged and invoices for all food, nonalcoholic beverages and alcohol beverages sold for the prior twelve (12) months. Should the City initiate a CUP modification or revocation proceeding, at the City’s discretion, the permittee may be required to provide (a) a statement of the percentage of gross sales, computed monthly, that resulted from the sale of prepared food for not longer than the prior twelve (12) months; and (b) the supporting data upon which the percentage is based. The City may also require an audit of the records of the business by a certified public accountant to determine the gross sales of food and alcohol or a forensic audit by a qualified auditor selected by the city of the information and data systems by which the information is produced. Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 6 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0675 The City has issued only one other CUP, for the Standing Room at 1320 Hermosa Avenue, which contains a similar condition to The Establishment that requires audited quarterly reports. Staff notes that while this would provide a remedy to the current violation by essentially removing the reason for this modification/revocation proceeding, it should be noted that the Commission or Council may bring the Condition of the CUP into alignment with the updated City Council policy for on-sale restaurants at subsequent CUP review proceedings and/or the permittee may submit to the Commission for a CUP amendment. Conclusion Pursuant to Section 17.70.010, in order to revoke or modify a CUP the Council must find that one or more of the conditions set forth in that section exist. In order to sustain the Commission’s revocationthey must support the findings of the Planning Commission. The information in this report documents that the CUP (Resolution 08-6617) for a restaurant for on- sale general alcohol and live entertainment has been exercised contrary to the terms or conditions ofthe CUP, is in violation of laws or regulations, the conditions of approval are inadequate to mitigate the impacts of the use allowed by the permit, and that potential public health, safety and welfare concerns merit modification of the permit. While no serious crime or overcrowding incidences have occurred since July 1, 2015, minor noise disturbances have been reported. These operational issues, combined with late-night hours and live entertainment, have created a potential for bar or nightclub activity rather than restaurant use. Options are provided for Council consideration as an alternative to the Commission’s revocation considering that the magnitudes of the violations have been relatively minor. These options include reducing impacts and re-focus the business on restaurant use with alcohol and live entertainment as incidental uses, or bring the CUP into alignment with recent code changes which eliminates the violation of condition 3 that requires audited records. Attachments: 1.P.C. Resolution 15-17 2.Planning Commission 5-19-15 minutes and staff report 3.Approved CUP, Resolution No. C.C. 08-6617 4.Approved CUP Floor Plan, Resolution No. C.C. 12-6780 5.Letter from Landlord’s agent, dated May 12, 2015 6.Photos of 1332 Hermosa Avenue, May 20157.CUP Review: Planning Commission Minutes and Staff Reports 8.Enforcement Officer Report 9.Correspondence regarding 50:50 Audit Assessment: a.Police Chief letter b.Community Development Department emails c.Letter from Permittee’s solicitor 10.Updated HBMC Sections 17.04.050, 17.40.080 and 17.70.010 11.Radius Map and Legal Posting12.Correspondences Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 7 of 8 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0675 Respectfully Submitted by: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Concur: Sharon Papa, Police Chief Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 8 of 8 powered by Legistar™ ATTACHMENT 4 SITE PHOTOS Fig 1: View of 1332 Hermosa Avenue, front elevation, from west side of Hermosa Avenue, just south of 14th Street Fig 2: View of 1332 Hermosa Avenue, front elevation, from west side of Hermosa Avenue, just south of 14th Street Fig 3: View of interior corridor, 1332 Hermosa Avenue Fig 4: View of rear door, The Establishment, 1332 Hermosa Avenue Fig 5: Rear elevation, 1332 Hermosa Avenue, viewed from corner of 14th Street and Palm Drive Fig 6: Rear parking lot, 1332 Hermosa Drive, viewed from corner of 14th Street and Palm Drive American Institute of Certified Public Accountants” is exactly what our CPA provides and what they would provide. I have attached an e-mail from Pam Townsend from one year ago today detailing exactly what was required to submit, far less then what we actually submit (attached). Regarding audits of 50/50: I want to point out that in February of 2012 the City Council voted to audit Sales Tax reports for businesses in Hermosa and allocated $10,000 to that function. Never mind the fact that $10,000 is equal to the City share of 1% of sales tax on $10 million in sales tax. So there would have to be a shortage in reporting of $10M to even break even on these audits. It turned out that it was not legal to audit private businesses sales tax returns as that is a State function, so the Planning Department came up with the “50/50 audit” as part of revocation hearings for Point 705 and Café Boogaloo. The planning department then moved on to the four places in town with reporting requirements for 50/50 as a ploy to look at sales tax figures not 50/50. In December 2013 we provided Sales Tax Returns even though they were not required by the CUP or State law, we also provided P&L’s for 2012 and the tax returns for 2012. At that time Café Boogaloo closed, Studio sold and Waterman’s stated they were not 50/50 which ended the audit. We have since then provided every purchase receipt broken down by vendor, date, invoice number, and amount for all of 2013 and most of 2014. On February 24, 2015 the Planning Department wrote a letter using the Police Chief’s letterhead requesting 2014 Tax Returns and actual copies of receipts by February 26th. You don’t have to be a CPA to realize that 2014 tax returns are not even due the Federal government until April 15th which we will usually take a standard extension. It should not go unnoticed that if the planning department is able to write letters for the police department that any due process and checks and balances to protect property rights in this city are cast to the wind. Every single member of the current Planning Commission including Chairman Flaherty’s first meeting was present when our current CUP was written. There was a reason the Police Chief was chosen as the person to submit items to, mainly the fact that they can be trusted to keep items confidential and are outside of political pressure. The basic tenant of Planning and Zoning law is that there has to be a police problem to use police powers in a city. That is clearly without dispute not the case here. My location has not had a fight, an over-capacity ticket, an underage drinking ticket, noise complaint or any other meaningful issue in Hermosa Beach since December 2007. To put that in context, that is before even President Barack Obama took office for his first term or the start of the “Great Recession”. My restaurant provides food 7-days a week from 4pm-12 midnight to the Beach House Hotel a 96- room property the largest in the city. There is nothing I can do as a business owner or an individual to sell more food to residents and visitors to our city. If anyone has ideas on how to increase food sales I am open to trying any suggestions. Most of you know my efforts on behalf of the Hermosa Beach business community to make things better for everyone. Some of the unpaid positions that I currently hold: President-Hermosa Beach Hospitality Association Executive Board Member-Business Advocacy-Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Board Member- Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce The only Hermosa Business representative for the Technical Working Group for the Hermosa Beach General Plan Re-write. 2 1332 Hermosa Avenue, #1, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310.376.7616 m Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 2 of 17 Economic Development Committee member BHS/NCAAD Prevention Community Council (Underage Drinking and Drug Abuse) I actually organize and pay thousands each year un-reimbursed from my company for extra security on the Pier Plaza during busy events. I personally organize every BHS Responsible Alcohol training for every on-sale employee in the City in coordination with Behavioral Health Services and the Police Department (Hundreds of people trained in the last year). I have done everything in my power both with time and money to make this city better. I am proud to say I own a business in this community and just like you I am a resident with a elementary age daughter. Throw out your duties as a Planning Commissioner for a moment and look at my case as a citizen. Is anything you have seen worth destroying my business and reputation? As an appointed Planning Commissioner, is this what you envisioned when you wrote my CUP and does a revocation / modification action make one thing better in this city. I don’t always agree with you but I do respect you as a citizen of Hermosa and a Member of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission. I hope that we continue to work together to make this city safer and better for residents and visitors alike. If you have any questions, please feel free to call my cell phone (310) 908-6157. Sincerely, David Lowe Managing Member Knight Restaurant Group, LLC. 3 1332 Hermosa Avenue, #1, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310.376.7616 m Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 3 of 17 from: David Lowe <dave@knight-restaurant- group.com> to: CHIEF Sharon Papa <spapa@hermosapolice.org> cc: Pamela Townsend <ptownsend@hermosabch.org>, Ken Robertson <krobertson@hermosabch.org>, Peter Pierce <ppierce@rwglaw.com> date: Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:42 PM subject: Resend of 3rd QTR Summary Review Chief: I apologize for the late time of this letter, I occasionally have to give my daughter priority over city issues. Please find attached the CPA letter for 3rd QTR 2014 from January 2015. I thought the accountants had sent this to you directly in January. In response to the February 24, 2015 letter written by Ken Robertson requesting 2014 tax returns by February 26th, they are not due to the federal government until April 15th and we will likely take the standard extension. We have submitted to you a year and a half of every purchase receipt for the business. It is unfeasible to make thousands of copies of the actual receipts from multiple sources and locations. The receipts I provided are broken down by vendor, date, invoice number and amount. They were double checked on multiple bank statements and calendars to assure accuracy. Each vendor only sells alcohol or food. I do question how the Planning Department asks for additional information using your authority as Police Chief, before they have looked at these summaries? I have provided the exact same summaries for every quarter for the last three years and a previous company for three years before that without question. It seems odd that after 6-years all of a sudden these reports are not sufficient. I have received numerous e-mails from the planning department over the years detailing and even providing the form required for these summaries. This is a complete departure from the past practice and advice of the city staff. Is it possible to get a copy of another CPA letter provided by anyone else in town that is acceptable? I simply want to find common ground for these reports, and I would prefer not to have to request that through the Public Records Act process. In order to double check what our CPA has submitted, I have talked in depth to partners at Deloitte one of the largest accounting firms about the Planning Department concern that the "Attestation Standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants" was not sufficient for the City Planning Department. They sent me the attached article and mentioned that no publicly traded company or private company they work with which is an immense list require quarterly audited financial statements. The cost and time involved for full quarterly audits would be unprecedented for any company in the country, and make it impossible to survive as a company in this city. Just going through the CPA attestation process as a small business is time consuming and extremely expensive. 1 | Page Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 4 of 17 In the morning our CPA will submit the 4th QTR summary as well. I am interested in working out whatever concerns the city has within reason and feasibility. I know you will be busy tomorrow with the St. Patrick's Day holiday but I will be available at (310) 908-6157 if you have questions or I can provide anything further. Sincerely, David Lowe 1332 Hermosa Avenue, #1 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310.908.6157 www.eat-establishment.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 2 | Page Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 5 of 17 Responsibilities of Audit Firms for Quarterly Financial Statements by John Cromwell, Demand Media Quarterly financial statements are required for publicly-traded companies, but private businesses may produce them as well. Quarterly statements for publicly- traded companies are not required by law to be audited. However, audits provide a level of authority and security to investors. Audited statements are reviewed by outside parties to ensure the report's accuracy and completeness. If quarterly statements are audited by the company itself, the review team must meet the same principles and follow the same guidelines that would apply during any audit. 10-Q Defined If a business is publicly traded in the United States, federal law requires that the business update investors every quarter as to its fiscal condition. To fulfill this requirement, businesses must file form 10-Q with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Attached to the 10-Q are financial statements detailing the current fiscal status of the business. These statements are not required to be audited. The business is required to file three 10-Qs, one for each of the first three quarters of the fiscal year. At the end of the last quarter, the business is required to file the annual report, or the 10- K. All financial reports of publicly-traded companies, including 10-Qs, are listed on the SEC’s EDGAR database. Audit Defined An audit is a detailed examination of a business's financial records. There are two types of audit. An external audit is used to verify the content of reports meant to be provided to investors. An external audit is meant to ensure that the books contain all transactions, that all financial statements reflect the current financial status of the business, and that the statements are drafted using Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. An internal audit is meant to ensure the smooth operation of the business. It focuses on detecting fraud, promoting efficiency and monitoring results for internal decision making. Management Assertions When a business compiles financial statements, its management asserts something about each number and bit of data that it records. An external audit is meant to test these management assertions. The five major assertions are existence, completeness, ownership, valuation, presentation and disclosure. The existence criteria demonstrates that the assets, liabilities and equities exist, and the transactions that gave rise to revenues and expenses occurred. Management also asserts that the statements are complete, or contain all of the relevant financial transactions and balance sheet items. The accuracy component asserts that every item in the statements is correct. The valuation element establishes that all items listed in the report are reported at the correct value. Finally, the auditor must ensure that the statements are presented in conformity with current accounting standards. http://smallbusiness.chron.com/responsibilities-audit-firms-quarterly-financial-statements-34627.html Page 1 Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 6 of 17 Audit Evidence The auditor must conduct tests to obtain sufficient evidence that demonstrates that the statements comply with management's assertions. The auditor will test the business's controls, which are the safeguards management has put into place to ensure that the financial data is accurately recorded, and the completeness of the information in the statements. To reasonably demonstrate that an assertion is true, the auditor must gather sufficient evidence to support that claim. What evidence is sufficient depends on the risk of the company misstating the element of the financial statement being tested and the quality of the evidence. http://smallbusiness.chron.com/responsibilities-audit-firms-quarterly-financial-statements-34627.html Page 2 Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 7 of 17 Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 8 of 17 Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 9 of 17 BHS/NCADD Prevention Community Council Meeting Minutes Hermosa Beach Community Ctr, 710 Pier Ave., EOC Meeting called to order by BHS Prevention Coordinator Holly Maynes at 10:10 am Attendance: BHS Prevention Staff: Holly Maynes, Raunda Frank and Mike Ballue: PCC Members: Dorothy Forba, Hilary Greenspan, Kamala Horwitz, Liz Glozman, Jacqueline Morris, Elaine Ruggiero, Anna Pirkl, Debbi Freedman, Addisyn Bross, Debbie Bross, Jorge Grandique, Joan Jenkins, Liz Glozman, Dave Lowe I. Beach Cities Symposium: Holly Maynes and Raunda Frank provided an overview of the goals and objectives of the Beach Cities Symposium and led a group discussion covering each of the items on the planning checklist. Parents and teens are invited to attend the event. The confirmed panelists are HB Police Chief Sharon Papa, MB prosecutor Joan Jenkins, Melissa Flores, former teen drinker, Dr. Donnie Watson, Thelma McMillen. Debbie Bross agreed to join the panel to present a parent’s perspective on teen drinking issues, Dave Lowe will make contact with USC administrator to secure a college representative for the panel. Debbie Bross advised she could contact ABC agent Mark Reese to see if he was available to participate as a panelist. Kryss Castle will also contact a Freedom 4 U therapist as a potential panelist. II. Promotion: Katie Casey of the HB Public Information office will secure her media contacts and emphasize coverage of the symposium which will be used to direct parents and city officials to the Reality Party. PCC members will continue to promote the event by passing out/ emailing flyers and speaking to their community contacts. BHS is requesting RSVP’s for the symposium so that we can estimate the attendance so as not to exceed the second story theater capacity of about 114 people. Volunteers: 6 volunteers (12-25 yrs old) are needed for the symposium skit. – Addisyn Bross and two of her friends will participate. Dorothy Forba will provide at least 3 volunteers from her program. The volunteers will meet at Dorothy’s office at 5pm to prepare for the 10-15 minute reality party skit. Jackie Morris and Dorothy Forba volunteered to work the sign in table for the event. Community groups will be encouraged to bring their resource literature. Reality Party for Parents: Hilary Greenspan/Jackie Morris of CLARE Foundation passed out flyers for the March 28th Reality Party; There is online Registration for the Reality party tours online at http://www.straightupvc.org/register. Jackie will also take sign-ups at the Symposium. Volunteers: The group was asked to submit the name of youth volunteers to Jackie/Hilary by March 11, 2015 for the Reality party. Several sponsors have agreed to Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 10 of 17 provide food for the participants the day of the event. A panel (debriefing) discussion will follow each parent tour. CLARE will work with Dorothy Forba and Dave Lowe to coordinate the location(s) for this session. Next meeting: The next regular monthly PCC meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 10:00 am. The Meeting was adjourned. Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 11 of 17 Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 12 of 17 Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 13 of 17 Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 14 of 17 Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 15 of 17 Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 16 of 17 Knight Submittal Item 7: 031715 Page 17 of 17 H.B. Restaurant and Tavern Association advocates for businesses Posted: Friday, March 21, 2014 12:03 pm by Alana Garrigues After more than two decades, volunteers with the Hermosa Restaurant and Tavern Association are continuing to help businesses succeed, address safety and security concerns and bring a sense of cooperation to the downtown business corridor. The association has been revitalized since 2008 when Dave Lowe, owner of Establishment Hermosa Beach, and Ron Newman, co-owner of Sharkeez, stepped on board. The two had a vision to end the area’s sketchy reputation and encourage businesses to work together respectfully, improving the area’s relationship with the city’s residents and political leaders. “It’s the cooperation between the city and the police and the businesses to be able to work as a team to stop (problems),” Newman said. “You can’t do it individually.” To that end, they’ve set up coordination with the Hermosa Beach Police Department, interacting with officers and keeping one another on top of key issues. The restaurant owners have collaborated to establish dress codes and inform each other when troublemakers or disorderly patrons leave one bar and try to enter another. They also encourage the police and fire departments to stop by, look at overcrowding issues and underage problems and evaluate tension and unwanted conduct. This year, Lowe said the association goal is to train more than 500 bar and restaurant employees to prevent underage drinking and over-serving through the the county’s Behavior and Health Services program. They’ve just completed the two rounds of training for 50 employees, and will continue to work their way through all employees from 15 restaurants and bars every two years. “It gives the employees that work at different businesses the bigger picture,” Lowe said. “They understand – if you do this, it effects everyone.” http://tbrnews.com/news/hermosa_beach/h-b-restaurant-and-tavern-association-advocates-for-businesses/article_8f0c302c-b12b-11e3-b0f7-001a4bcf887a.html Page 1 Newman underscored the importance of collaboration. “Even if I’m doing a good job and he’s doing a good job, but three or four (bars) aren’t, it really affects the whole area,” Newman said. The association has also stepped up efforts to improve public safety in the area. They’ve purchased and installed three stadium-style floodlights in Pier Plaza that the police can turn on to help clear the area. The floodlights are set on timers to give patrons enough time to leave the plaza safely and get home. The association also installs portable toilets and hires high-level security, made up of off-duty officers and security agents, on busy holidays, such as St. Patrick’s Day, the Fourth of July and New Year’s Eve. That frees up the HBPD to focus on other areas of the city and turn its attention to house parties and public safety along high-trafficked areas. Both Lowe and Newman have made themselves accessible to City Council members, city staff and the Chamber of Commerce to speak on behalf of the restaurants and bars. “Long-term, when they rebuild some of the trash enclosures, the city’s looking at adding bathrooms either in Lot A or Lot B, so we have to advocate for issues like that,” Lowe said. “We also advocate with the city when there’s graffiti in the structure ... we work with public works, the tree lighting ceremony, whatever it is. Complaints that businesses have, we can address because we have contacts and we know who to talk to.” Newman and Lowe have worked with businesses to address aesthetics as well. They talk about trash issues, keeping the back stoop clean, maintaining a professional exterior and encourage businesses to clean up graffiti immediately so there is no time to create an impression of a neglected business community. While membership is primarily limited to downtown businesses, along lower Pier Avenue, Pier Plaza and Hermosa Avenue between 8th to 14th streets, Lowe said it is not about excluding any businesses in the city. He feels floodlights and extra security would not be worth the investment along Aviation Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway, for example. In the near future, Lowe said that the Hermosa Restaurant and Tavern Association will morph into the Hermosa Hospitality Association, increasing their work with hotels and businesses that cater to tourism of all types. Adding hotels to the mix, they feel, will allow a more seamless experience for visitors in the downtown area. http://tbrnews.com/news/hermosa_beach/h-b-restaurant-and-tavern-association-advocates-for-businesses/article_8f0c302c-b12b-11e3-b0f7-001a4bcf887a.html Page 2 News|Richard Foss|January 3, 2013 5:00 am Last year’s top new restaurants in the South Bay For over a decade, one of my first tasks of the year has been to make a list of the best new restaurants in the South Bay. It’s never an easy job. The overall quality of the dining experience in the Beach Cities has been improving, and it’s harder each year for newcomers to match the standards of their established competitors, much less excel in comparison. The size of my list has varied, depending on the number of establishments that opened and the virtues of the places under consideration. This year I got to seven before deciding I had included all that unequivocally qualified. I hesitated over a few places that showed promise but were too inconsistent in food or service. In the end I decided against them – to make the cut a restaurant had to offer a reliably good experience. As always, there are judgment calls about just what makes an establishment new – merely changing the menu or ownership is not enough. Some established places made major changes but kept the same identity, and that was enough to disqualify them. One name is missing from this list – House of Pita would have certainly made the cut had they remained open, but they closed in late November amid reports of illness among the owners. Condolences to the Naouikhir family – we hope to see you again, and already miss your wonderful whole-wheat pita bread. So without further ado, here is my list of the best restaurants to open in the South Bay in 2012 – sorted alphabetically this time. Chefs Dominique Theval of Dominque’s Kitchen, Alan Jackson of Lemonade, Tin Vuong of Abigaile, and Ben Wright of Jackson’s Food + Drink, along with Jackson’s owner Scott Cooper (seated)) represent the best new restaurants that opened in the South Bay during 2012. Photo by Chelsea Sektnan 1 Abigaile The pre-opening expectations for this place were so high that I doubted they could deliver – the owners put a ton of money into Abigaile’s char sui pork belly confit with wilted greens and pepper-pear relish. Photo by Wicked+ Media redecorating the former Union Cattle Company, announced the hiring of a celebrity chef, and announced that they were going to restart the microbrewery after years of inactivity. Somehow they delivered on every level, serving adventurous food in an outlandish but comfortable environment while pleasing beer snobs with the output of those big copper tanks. Founding chef Max diMare turned things over to Tin Vuong and standards not only didn’t fall, the place got even more adventurous. Recently Abigaile started hosting special dinners that pushed things further, exploring the limits of a cuisine that is both hedonistic and healthy. This stylish restaurant offers food for adults in a casual, whimsical environment, which fits Hermosa very well and has elevated the local scene. 1301 Manhattan Avenue Hermosa Beach (310) 798-8227 2 Dominique’s Kitchen Chef Dominique Theval The only restaurant from Redondo to make the cut this year serves French food in an elegant atmosphere and is very reasonably priced – a rare combination indeed. You can get a starter and entrée here for under twenty dollars, and that’s not a happy hour or midweek price – it’s just what they charge. Chef Dominique Theval has traveled the world and undoubtedly could bring in influences from Japan, Cambodia, or other places where he has traveled, but his heart is in France, and he cooks with mastery of those traditional flavors. He has the support of an expert serving staff that knows food and wine as well as the art of providing hospitality. Dominique’s Kitchen has made a brilliant debut, every detail perfect from the day they opened, and they have made an unpromising location into a destination for diners. 522 S Pacific Coast Hwy, Redondo Beach (424) 247-9054 3 Establishment The Establishment’s blue chip nachos. Photo by Kathalina Rodriguez I have hardly ever gone to a place with lower expectations than on my first visit to Establishment – their website was a joke, the phone was out of order, and it looked like a lounge scene at which the food was an afterthought. I was surprised by innovative versions of bar snacks and some eclectic offerings – nachos that only vaguely resemble the usual pile of cheese, chips, and beans, quesadillas that owe more inspiration to Napa than Mexico, and barbecue-style ribs that are more than the usual snack to accompany booze. Establishment is not doing anything remarkably different from many bars and dining lounges in the South Bay, but they’re doing it remarkably better. It’s a rare triumph for a lounge-style place where skill in the kitchen seems to be appreciated by a crowd that is doing more than just making the scene. 1332 Hermosa Ave, Hermosa Beach (310) 798-6216 4 Hamptons The South Bay’s only restaurant that celebrates New England and East Coast resort dining has had some challenges, among Hamptons. Photo by Kathalina Rodriguez them the fact that very few locals have even heard of this cuisine. When I wrote about this place in August I called it a good restaurant that could become a great one, and that judgment stands; they are struggling for consistency, but there are enough excellent items here to keep them on my list. Their chowder, grilled seafood, and especially the crabcakes are solid renditions of East Coast favorites, and the pizzas have been praiseworthy. The owners are still tinkering with the food, having recently hired a new chef, added an oyster bar, and started opening for breakfast, so there is a sense that Hamptons is experimenting with ways to improve on an already good operation. 1131 Manhattan Ave, Manhattan Beach (310) 430-1124 5 Jackson’s Food + Drink Lunch at Jackson’s Food and Drink in El Segundo. Photo by Mark McDermott The name is similar, the chef-owner is the same, but this not a replica of the restaurant that Scott Cooper used to run in Hermosa. That place was a bistro specializing in steaks and pastas with modest forays into adventurous cuisine – this one is a daring venture focused on artisanal foods and unusual combinations. There are some normal dishes that are very well done – pizza using homemade fennel sausage, roast chicken, even an exceptional steak, but the most fun way to dine here is to order seasonal tapas and share. The place has a lot of character for a location in a modern building next to the movie theater on Rosecrans, particularly the patio with fireplace and weathered wood siding. Jackson’s is a comfortable, characterful place in an area dominated by chain restaurants, an original restaurant in the Rosecrans corridor. 2041 Rosecrans Ave # 190, El Segundo (310) 606-5500 6 Lemonade Lemonade, at Manhattan Beach’s Metlox Plaza. Photo by Randy Berler In over a decade of writing these best-of lists I have never included a chain restaurant, but I’m doing that now because this one brings something unique to the area. I’m not a fan of the fast-food interior or paper plates, but if that’s how they keep costs down it’s something I’ll deal with. Lemonade has a price to quality ratio that is second to none in the South Bay, and they excel at fresh-tasting salads, stews, and other prepared dishes. They are trying to bring chef-driven style to a cafeteria, a noble experiment that does have limits. There are made-to- order sandwiches for those who want to customize things, but otherwise you have to find something they have that you want. This is not much of a problem because there are so many good items attractively displayed that something will tickle your fancy. Lemonade sometimes goes beyond what they can do well, as in the grilled items that are best served immediately, but if you avoid those you can get exceptional fast food in an area where that is a rarity. 451 Manhattan Beach Blvd, Manhattan Beach (310) 545-5777 7 Marine Street Café Marine Street Cafe’s manager Cliff Guy and owner Skylar Tourigny. Photo by Esther Kang The little café at the corner of Marine and Highland is in a residential district, so their menu is probably calibrated to what will please the locals in North Manhattan. Based on the evidence, people in these parts are big fans of artisan sandwiches, homemade soups, and freshly ground burgers with organic fixings. The Marine Street Cafe open from morning until night, so you can get egg dishes for breakfast and a limited but interesting menu after sundown, but the specialties here seem to be paninis and sandwiches. Their version of a Vietnamese chicken banh mi is very good, the burger is a standout, and the panini with melted gruyere, peaches, and dates is odd but wonderful. The price for a meal here will be a bit higher than it will at most places in town, but the payoff is superbly fresh food made from organic ingredients. (2201 Highland Ave Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 (310) 545-5518 Upcoming In 2013, several major openings have been announced this year, most recently the arrival of Grimaldi’s Pizzeria in the long-shuttered Daily Grill space on Rosecrans. Killer Shrimp will open in Hermosa, though they’re being coy about exactly where, and Colgan’s Gastropub will open downstairs from La Campana. In Manhattan Beach, the owners of MB Post will debut a seafood restaurant near their current place, the Boardroom and Pitfire Grill will finally see the light of day, and a new operation will move in at the current 12 + Highland. Meg Hall, renowned for her Made By Meg catering business, will open a restaurant in Redondo, and a Czech restaurant called Praha will open in Riviera Village. The evolution of the local dining scene continues, and by the time I sit down to write this column a year from now it will be to document a local scene that will be even more interesting. 8 Dining|Richard Foss|August 16, 2012 12:54 pm Establishment gets down to business in Hermosa Beach [RESTAURANT REVIEW] The Establishment’s blue chip nachos. Photo by Kathalina Rodriguez There are restaurants in New York City, Hollywood, and other bastions of hipness that make a point of their diffident attitude toward customers. This includes having no signage, phone, or other identifying marks – the idea is to convey that that they are so secure about being found by the cognoscenti that they need not make it easy, lest the vulgar and unwashed masses clog up the place. For some time I was convinced that Hermosa Beach’s Establishment was following a version of this strategy, since they had no functional website and their phone was out of order. They weren’t trying to hide the place, though – the silvery facade and colored lighting stood out even in a glittery section of Hermosa Avenue. After waiting for the place to show some sign of 1 | Page permanence – perhaps putting something other than “coming soon” of their website, for instance – I finally decided to just drop in and see what was going on, which turns out to be a lot. Establishment looks like a party place at which food would be an afterthought, with most of the tables at a height that suggests they’re for drinks rather than meals, but there is some serious cooking going on here. With very few exceptions everything appears to be made in-house, and some of the presentations and ideas show real creativity. Exhibit A on this score is the plate of “nachos,” and I put that in quotes not only because these are nothing like any I’ve had, but because they only vaguely resemble the description on the menu. Instead of the usual layers of chips melted with cheese and beans, there are two whole fried corn tortillas topped with cheese, chicken, beef, and chipotle sauce, flanked by a mound of olive tapenade and dollops of guacamole and beans, with a stack of corn chips in the middle. The complexity verges on the baroque, but it’s a brilliantly conceived dish with many flavors to sample alone or in combination – despite my usual tendency to order entirely different meals when I visit a place twice for a review, we had to order this both times. It was still just as satisfying and interesting on the second visit, and since our second visit was during happy hour when it was five bucks instead of fourteen, it tasted even better. We tried a few more items from that starters menu on both occasions, partly because we are thrifty by nature, partly because it was what everyone around us was doing. A quesadilla stuffed with grilled chicken, green apple, goat cheese, and ancho chili cranberry compote had a fine combination of spicy, sweet, and tart flavors, with just enough goat cheese unctuousness for balance. An order of fries arrived at the table hot and crisp, which is about all you can ask for, and with three dipping sauces which were better than expected – I homed in on the garlic mayonnaise as opposed to the ketchup and the never explained mild third sauce. We also tried an order of chicken wings three ways – two grilled with different barbecue sauces, plus a pair of traditional buffalo wings. Two of the grilled wings had a sweet and spicy barbecue sauce, two a vaguely Thai chili sauce that was in a very similar sweet and spicy groove – I’d like to see them use some grilling sauce with a different flavor, such as a Carolina mustard barbecue or rum- ginger sauce, just to add more range to the flavors. Snack items like these demand a beverage, and beside sampling a few wines (Parducci Pinot Nor and a much better Wild Horse Pinot), we tried chocolate mint and pomegranate martinis. My wife ordered both of those, actually – I would have expected both to be too sweet for my palate. They both nodded in that direction but were shy of sugary – the crushed mint candy around the rim gave just the right peppery flavor to the chocolate. My drinks palate still leans toward concoctions where you taste the spirits, but these were as good as sweet drinks get in my book. For main courses we took our server’s advice and ordered two more items that are on the shared plates menu – a half-rack of barbecue ribs and an order of grilled fish tacos. The ribs had been 2 | Page precooked and grill finished so they were fall off the bone tender, and the sweet and spicy barbecue sauce made them a tasty and rather messy treat. The spiciness was cumulative – what seemed sweet and mild had built up layers of spiciness by the time we were through. I prefer ribs that have the smoky flavor and coarser texture you get from slow-smoking, but these were quite decent. They were served with excellent house made potato chips that arrived hot, a tribute to the coordination of servers and kitchen given that the place was fairly full. The fish in the tacos had been grilled rather than fried, and though they were nicely cooked the balance seemed slightly off. Perhaps it’s that the cole slaw wasn’t tart enough, the chipotle cream too mild, but no flavor or combination of flavors was quite assertive enough for my tastes. (My wife liked them just as they were and would probably regard my idea of perfect fish tacos as too spicy, but there are some things in which the parties in any relationship just agree to disagree.) We were looking forward to trying the apple crisp for dessert, but on the only visit where we had enough room after the entrees, they had run out. We had churros with ice cream instead – premade ones, alas, but still tasty – and called it a night. We fully intend to come back to Establishment and try some more items, possibly one of the steaks or the cedar planked salmon, because the skill they have shown with the other items here was noteworthy. This establishment is open for business and serious about their food, and they set a standard for lounge dining in Hermosa. Establishment is at 1332 Hermosa Avenue in Hermosa Beach. Open daily for dinner only, full bar, street parking. Starters $8-15, mains $10-25. 3 | Page Men’s Women’s ~;~►~~ RICHARDS ~ WATSON ~ GERSHON ~►~C~ ATTORNEYS AT LAW —A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 355 South Grand Avenue, goth Floor, Los Angeles, California 9oo7i-3ioi Telephone 2i3.6z6.8484 Facsimile 213.626.0078 T. Peter Pierce September 22, 2015ppierce@rwglaw.com VIA EMAI L Mayor Petty and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Re: Establishment Restaurant and Bar —City Council Review of CUP Revocation Dear Mayor Petty and Members of the City Council: I write on behalf of David Lowe and Knight Restaurant Group, LLC, operators of Establishment Restaurant and Bar in Hermosa Beach ("Establishment"). Mr. Lowe has asked me to provide comments in advance of the public hearing on September 24, 2015 regarding the City Council's review of Planning Commission (PC) Resolution 15-17. Mr. Lowe and I have reviewed PC Resolution 15-17, and Staff Report 15- 0675 prepared by Community Development Director Ken Robertson. PC Resolution 15-17 PC Resolution 15-17 sets forth three findings as grounds for revocation of the Conditional Use Permit ("CUP") governing operation of Establishment. This letter addresses each finding in turn. First, the resolution includes a finding that the CUP has been exercised contrary to condition number 3 of the CUP. Condition number 3 requires Establishment to submit "summaries of gross receipts of food and alcohol indicating the percentage of each to the total on a monthly basis, to be audited and certified by a certified public accountant." Mr. Lowe must submit those summaries to the Chief of Police on a quarterly basis. Mr. Lowe has submitted those summaries for every quarter since Establishment opened in 2012 through 2014. Mr. Lowe has provided the City for the last three years the audits of Establishment's gross revenues conducted by Jennifer Arrache, CPA, of The Arrache Group, Inc. The City has accepted those audits as satisfaction of the CUP's requirement that the summary of gross receipts be audited and certified by a CPA. On this basis alone, Establishment has complied with condition number 3. RICHARDS (WATSON (GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW -A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Mayor Petty and Members of the City Council September 22, 2015 Page 2 Although condition number 3 requires only the monthly summaries, other items were requested of Mr. Lowe by the City's accounting consultant, including (1) actual invoices for all food vendors for 2014 showing individual food products; (2) items sold either by week or by month, and the corresponding menu prices for each item sold; and (3) an on-site inspection of Establishment's POS system to verify that sales of food and liquor are properly rung into categories that reflect food and liquor sales, and are properly recorded on daily sales reports. Following the Planning Commission's meeting in March, Mr. Lowe met with Chief Papa on April 1 and offered to make the actual invoices available for inspection on site. Mr. Lowe's offer still stands. In addition to that offer, Mr. Lowe submitted at the end of January 2015 comprehensive lists of the invoices for all food and liquor items Establishment purchased in 2013 and during the first three quarters of 2014. For each vendor, the list identified the transaction date, the invoice number, a description of the product delivered, and the amount paid. Mr. Lowe believed that the lists would suffice because each vendor sells only liquor or only food; no vendor sells both, and the product sold is clear from the name of the vendor. Mr. Lowe has gone beyond what is required of him under the CUP. The CUP requires a summary of gross receipts of food and alcohol sales sufficient to convey the percentage of each as part of total sales. The CUP also provides that the summaries are "to be audited and certified by a certified public accountant." Nothing in the CUP requires Mr. Lowe to submit anything other than the summaries identified. The CUP provides that the "Police Chief reserves the right to request additional verification as needed to verify compliance with this Conditional Use Permit." Given all of the information Mr. Lowe has already provided, no additional information is necessary. Under the above circumstances, substantial evidence does not support the finding that Establishment operated in violation of condition number 3 of its CUP. Second, PC Resolution No. 15-17 includes a finding that Establishment has not cooperated with a City consultant's efforts to conduct a forensic audit related to Establishment's food and beverage sales. The first problem with this finding is that nothing in the CUP requires Establishment to submit to a forensic audit of its food and beverage sales. As noted RICHARDS ~ WATSON ~ GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW -A PROfE5510NAt CORPORATION Mayor Petty and Members of the City Council September 22, 2015 Page 3 above, condition number 3 requires "summaries of gross receipts of food and alcohol indicating the percentage of each to the total on a monthly basis, to be audited and certified by a certified public accountant." Mr. Lowe has complied with that condition. It was not until the Police Chief's letter of February 12, 2015 that the City asserted that the audits provided by Mr. Lowe "do not comply with the requirements of your CUP to provide an audit as it expressly states that it is not based on an examination of your financial documents." The CUP does not require that the audit be based on an examination of the financial documents themselves. Furthermore, the City's request that Mr. Lowe submit additional information to Albert da Costa, the City's consultant, itself does not comply with the requirement that a CPA audit Establishment's summaries of gross receipts. Mr. da Costa is not a CPA. By requiring Mr. Lowe to comply with a condition that appears nowhere in the CUP, the Planning Commission improperly revoked the CUP. The other problem with the finding ofnon-cooperation is that substantial evidence does not support that finding. As discussed above, Mr. Lowe has surpassed the requirements of the CUP in providing additional information requested by the City. Third, PC Resolution 15-17 includes a finding that the City cannot confirm whether Establishment is operating as a bona fide restaurant under Section 17.40.080 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. In revoking the CUP on this basis, the Planning Commission failed to proceed in the manner required by law. The auditing requirements referenced in the finding appear in Section 17.40.080, subdivision C.2 as amended by Ordinance No. 15-1350 on April 15, 2015. The amended provision establishes that the Planning Commission or the City Council may require submission of additional data to verify compliance with the definition of "restaurant" in Section 17.04.050. But since that provision was adopted, neither the Planning Commission nor the City Council has requested such data. Unless and until that request is made, and unless and until Establishment fails to comply with that request, the City cannot use as a basis for revoking the CUP the suggestion that Establishment does not comply with Section 17.40.080. Furthermore, the documents provided by Establishment to City staff show that the restaurant maintains at least 50 percent of its total gross sales from the sale of prepared food. Subdivision H of section 17.70.010 establishes that a business with on-sale alcoholic beverages is presumed to be operating as a restaurant when it RICHARDS ~ WATSON ~ GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW -A PROfE5510NA1 CORPORATION Mayor Petty and Members of the City Council September 22, 2015 Page 4 maintains a minimum of 50 percent of its total gross sales, computed monthly, from the sale of prepared food. Accordingly, Establishment is presumed to operate as a restaurant under the Municipal Code, and indulging the opposite presumption to revoke the CUP is improper. Furthermore, substantial evidence does not support the finding that the City cannot determine whether Establishment operates as a restaurant under the Code. For all of the foregoing reasons, the City Council should reinstate the CUP, and pursue a different course in addressing the concerns raised by the Planning Commission and City staff. Staff Renort 15-0675 Mr. Lowe very much appreciates that the Staff Report sets forth alternatives other than CUP revocation to address the understandable concerns expressed by members of the Planning Commission and by City staff. Mr. Lowe also appreciates the Staff Report's recognition that neither the Hermosa Beach Police Department nor Fire Department has reported any issues with respect to the Establishment, and that the open door ticket and missing "No Dancing" sign are minor issues. Under the circumstances, the first option presented by the Staff Report — reducing hours of operation or limiting entertainment —does not seem appropriate. A ticket for an open door during a July 4th afternoon celebration on a hot day, and a missing "No Dancing" sign that was stolen, would not appear to "create potential adverse impacts to the public health, safety and welfare" such that the CUP is being exercised in violation of the law. In addition, the City's Municipal Code does not authorize modification of a CUP because of conditions that may potentially lead to a violation of applicable law. Subdivision D of Section 17.70.010 authorizes modification of a CUP if it "recently has been exercised contrary to the terms [of the CUP], or in violation of [law]." Neither the open door ticket, nor the missing sign, qualifies as a basis for modification under this standard. The second option presented by the Staff Report appears much more appropriate because it would modify the CUP to reflect the revisions to the Municipal Code adopted in Apri12015. Specifically, the Council adopted new standards in Section 17.40.080.0 for restaurants that sell alcoholic beverages on site. Mr. Lowe understands that members of the City Council and the Planning Commission are concerned: about maintaining a standard of living for Hermosa Beach residents. For RICHARDS ~ WATSON ~ GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT lAW -A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Mayor Petty and Members of the City Council September 22, 2015 Page 5 that reason, if the CUP is reinstated and Mr. Lowe is permitted to continue operating, he will gladly comply with the newly adopted standards, and would also comply with those standards (as he has complied with the current standards) if the CUP were modified to include them. Very truly yours, T. Peter Pierce cc: Mr. David Lowe Ms. Sharon Papa, Chief of Police Mr. Ken Robertson, Director, Community Development Department Mr. Michael Jenkins, City Attorney 12906-0002\ 1877249v l .doc From: Sam Perrotti [mailto:sperrotti1@verizon.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 10:50 AM To: Carolyn Petty; Hany Fangary; Michael DiVirgilio; Peter Tucker Cc: Tom Bakaly; Ken Robertson; Ann Yang Subject: Modification/Revocation Hearing for the Establishment I will not be able to attend the hearing concerning the modification/revocation of the Establishment CUP. Also it would be difficult for me to restrict my remarks to 3 minutes. I would like to describe the rational for my decision to revoke the Establishment CUP. First some background for the Establishment. In the late 90’s David Lowe appeared before the Planning Commission requesting a CUP for the Blue 32 restaurant. The Planning Commission gave him everything he wanted, 2 AM closing, full alcohol, full entertainment and dancing. In 2006/2007 the nightlife on Pier Plaza and Hermosa Avenue got more rowdy than prior years. It got to the point where Chief Savelli stationed two police officers in the center strip divider on Hermosa Avenue in order to observe the activities of the Shore Restaurant and Blue 32. By 2008, Chief Savelli provided enough detailed documentation on violations so that the Planning Commission and the City Council modified the CUP’s for three restaurants, the Dragon, the Shore Restaurant and Blue 32. Their closing hours were reduced and a condition was added to include audits of the 50/50 code provisions. All three remodeled and renamed their restaurants. In subsequent years Pier Plaza and the downtown area calmed down quite a bit. About 3 years ago, an ABC Agent was doing routine checks in the downtown area. When he got to the Establishment, he could not find on his computer a restaurant for that address. He went inside and asked for their ABC license. When he entered the license number into his computer, he found that that license had been transferred to another entity located in Los Angeles. Later we found out that the liquor license for the Establishment had been auctioned by the ABC. Normally that is not done unless there are violations of ABC or Board of Equalization regulations, such as, not paying sales tax to the Board of Equalization. The ABC shut the Establishment down for serving alcohol without a license. When David Lowe appeared before the Planning Commission, he had a long explanation about why his license had been auctioned by the ABC but looking back on his explanation, it was a case of mismanagement. The Planning Commission decided not to take any action on his CUP. During all of this time, David Lowe was not submitting his required audits as per his CUP. It was one excuse after another. One of his excuses was that the hard drive on his computer failed in the heat and he could not retrieve the required information. Most responsible business people back up their computers. Years ago they used an external hard drive. In the last few years businesses backed up their computers using an internet service. I use Carbonite. Its subscription is $60 per year. If you Goggle “software for restaurants”, you will find about 30 various products that are available. Depending on the price, the functions vary. The more expense software will separate alcohol and food sales and complete audits in minutes. The Planning Commission again decided to not take any action against David Lowe. At the beginning of hearing on May 19, 2015 I had not decided how I would vote. As the hearing progressed I was leaning toward a modification of the Establishment CUP perhaps reducing the hours of entertainment and reducing the number of TVs. However, David Lowe choose to attack staff especially the consultant that the City has hired claiming his work was not adequate because he is not a CPA. I consider that argument bogus. I worked for the State of California for 33 years initially at Cal Trans for 6 years. The remainder of my State service was at the Department of Real Estate. Because of my background in appraisal, I was involved in investigating real estate fraud and appraisal fraud. I also investigated subdivision violations of the subdivision code and timeshare fraud. I was involved in several administrative hearings where investigators and auditors testified. In State service there were very few CPA’s. If you Google the job specifications for state auditor you will not find a requirement that an auditor be a CPA. Generally once an auditor qualifies as a CPA, he or she leaves state service and works for a private auditing company doubling their salary. My clerical staff was continually cherry picked by Century City law firms where they would become legal secretaries or paralegals tripling their salaries. If a respondent claimed at an administrative hearing that he or she would not comply with a request for information because the auditor was not a CPA, the judge would have found for the State Department whether it was the Department of Real Estate, ABC or the Board of Equalization. Why should the city be any different? The issue is that David Lowe has been ignoring the legitimate request for information by the Chief of Police and the Director of Community Development. I thought that action should not be ignored. Looking back at the hearing, it is obvious that the reason David Lowe has not submitted his audit is because he did not want the investors in his restaurant to know how badly it has been mismanaged and how poorly the restaurant is doing financially. A letter from the owner of the property dated May 19, 2015 stated that the Establishment would be evicted because of the nonpayment of rent. If the Establishment is still occupying the property, the Planning Commission’s decision should be affirmed by the City Council. If a new tenant is occupying the property, perhaps a modification of the CUP would be appropriate. Penalizing a new tenant for the sins of the prior tenant is not fair. In summary, I got tired of listening to years of excuses as to why he would not submit his audits. I ran out of patience and voted to revoke the Establishment CUP. In the 60’s there was a song, I Fought the Law. A line in the song was “I fought the law and the law won.” If the Establishment receives no punishment, David Lowe can change the lyrics to “I fought the law and I won.” Sam Perrotti Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0688 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 REPORT REGARDING INVESTIGATION OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT INTERACTION WITH CHRIS MILLER ON MARCH 3, 2015 IN FRONT OF THE STANDING ROOM, RELATED RESPONSE AND POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS (City Manager Tom Bakaly) Recommended Action: The City Council should review, evaluate and give direction as necessary relating to the results of the March 3, 2015 investigation, the release of the March 3, 2015 video tape, other issues related to March 3, 2015 investigation and events and discuss process improvements for moving forward. Background: On August 25,2015 this item was on the City Council agenda and Council asked that staff return with further discussion.Background information on this issue can be found in the attached August 25, 2015 staff report and the attached March 3, 2015 Investigation Synopsis of Facts. At the meeting of August 25,2015,the City Manager stated that the Investigator could not confirm that people in the patio yelled,“F-the Police.”Therefore,the City Manager stated we should not have stated that in the letter to the Chamber of Commerce,and on behalf of the staff,the City Manager apologized.The City Manager and Police Chief also submitted a written apology to the community that was published in the local newspapers (attached) Process Improvements: In response to questions raised about the release of information and the dashboard camera video, the City has made improvements to the Public Records Request Process.Attached is a flow chart that has been presented to and approved by City Council that depicts how the process is now managed.Any question regarding what can be disclosed is referred to the City Attorney before denying any request. On August 25,2015,the City Manager also stated that he had formally addressed issues related to this incident with the Police Chief.The City Manager also highlighted a new policy that any communication to outside agencies from City staff would need to be reviewed by the City Manager before being sent. As discussed at Council’s strategic planning in August,the Chief of Police is proposing a Community Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0688 As discussed at Council’s strategic planning in August,the Chief of Police is proposing a Community Advisory Board.Details regarding this issue can be found in the staff report that is included in this agenda. The Police Department and community will hopefully be able to collaborate on technology and data compilation projects that will make information sharing easier.An example of this will include the use of phone applications to assist in crime reporting. The City will continue to develop and enhance its formal community policing programs such as the Community Police Academy and Neighborhood watch programs. Personnel Matters and Claim from Chris Miller Because the March 3rd issue involved City staff,and a formal investigation was conducted,specific details relating to any personnel actions cannot be discussed publicly.Similarly,any issues relating to the pending claim filed by Ms Miller cannot be discussed publicly. With the exception of the pending claim against the City,it is hope that the public airing of this report and the process improvements described in this report will allow the community to heal and move forward. Attachments: 1.Staff Report from August 25, 2015 Council Meeting 2.March 3, 2015 Investigation Synopsis of Evidence 3.Apology to Community - City Manager and Police Chief 4.Public Records Request Process Improvements - Flow Chart from July 16, 2015 Council Meeting Respectfully Submitted by: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0644 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 25, 2015 REPORT REGARDING INVESTIGATION OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT INTERACTION WITH CHRIS MILLER ON MARCH 3, 2015 IN FRONT OF THE STANDING ROOM AND RELATED RESPONSE (City Manager Tom Bakaly) Recommended Action: The City Council review the information set forth below and in the attachment to this staff report and receive and file. Background: On the evening of March 3,2015,the Hermosa Beach Police Department (“HBPD”)responded to a call involving a vehicle stopped in and obstructing a traffic lane on Hermosa Avenue directly opposite The Standing Room.It was election night and a large group of Measure O opponents were gathered at The Standing Room to celebrate the defeat of the Measure.Attached to the vehicle obstructing the traffic lane was a trailer carrying an electronic sign displaying anti-Measure O messages.During the time that HBPD officers were on the scene dealing with the vehicle owner,comments were directed to them by Chris Miller and others.Subsequently,the Police Chief sent a letter to the Chamber of Commerce dated March 23,2015 which included a description of the events of that evening. Chris Miller and numerous members of the public,many of whom were in attendance at The Standing Room the evening of March 3,took exception to the description in the March 23 letter,in particular the comments and behavior ascribed to Ms.Miller.Several of these residents objected to the contents of the letter at City Council meetings. In light of the discrepancies in the versions of what occurred on March 3,2015,Chief Papa commenced an internal investigation of the incident.An outside investigator,Donna Evans,was engaged to conduct the investigation.Ms.Evans has over 15 years of experience as an attorney in labor and employment law.Currently she operates her own legal practice limited to workplace investigations (Title VI,EEOC,FEHA,retaliation,and other allegations of misconduct),training, mediation and consulting. Thereafter,the City Manager engaged Ms.Evans to conduct a second investigation in further response to concerns raised regarding the Police Department’s overall response to the March 3Hermosa Beach Printed on 8/20/2015Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0644 response to concerns raised regarding the Police Department’s overall response to the March 3 incident.The objective of the investigation was to address the discrepancies in various reports of the events of that evening in order to understand more precisely what happened and to enable the City Manager to assess the Police Department’s response. The investigation involved interviews with approximately thirty persons and review of relevant documents and tape recordings.The recordings consisted of (i)two surveillance video recordings (without audio)that were obtained from The Standing Room and the Establishment,(ii)the recording of the KTLA 5 news crew live broadcast outside The Standing Room,and (iii)a video/audio recording from the vehicle mounted camera in Officer Brunn’s vehicle that the investigator discovered existed in the course of her interviews of HBPD personnel after the City had responded to various public record requests.The latter recording was digitally enhanced to enable clearer reception.The late disclosure of the recording is being addressed as a personnel matter. On July 28,2015,the City Council directed that a report be returned to the Council regarding the investigation commenced by the City Manager in order that the above issues be aired publicly and addressed by the Council. This is that report. The investigations are now complete.A synopsis of facts prepared by Ms.Evans is attached to this report.The synopsis provides a narrative of the events of March 3,2015 and the actions that followed in the ensuing weeks as ascertained by Ms.Evans.The synopsis is a chronological summary of the evidence obtained by Ms.Evans and represents her independent assessment of what occurred based on everything she compiled and reviewed in the course of her investigation.Ms. Evans was not commissioned to make recommendations or draw legal conclusions and the synopsis does not do so.Further,the synopsis does not constitute a report pertaining to the misconduct of any employee or draw from any evidence that would be considered confidential under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (“POBRA”),Government Code section 8300 et seq.,or Penal Code Section 832,which mandate specific procedures governing the conduct of the law enforcement internal investigations and confidentiality of records generated therein.Further,the synopsis does not identify the names of witnesses, many of whom requested confidentiality. The synopsis enables the City Council and the public to understand better what happened on March 3.To the extent that weaknesses were exposed in the City’s response to public records requests in this instance,last month staff presented to Council a revamped procedure for assuring timely and accurate responses to those requests. To the extent that discipline of the City employees involved may be warranted as a consequence of these events,that matter is outside the purview of the City Council and is confidential.The Police Chief works directly for the City Manager;City Manager has reviewed the synopsis and has taken such actions as he deems appropriate.The Police Chief has received separate reports from the investigator addressing the behavior of her subordinate employees and has authority to take suchHermosa Beach Printed on 8/20/2015Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0644 investigator addressing the behavior of her subordinate employees and has authority to take such action as she deems appropriate.POBRA,the City’s personnel rules and the Memoranda of Understanding with the City employees’unions govern disciplinary actions of law enforcement personnel.While some members of the public have requested public airing of disciplinary matters, under these rules,that process is confidential and the City may not engage publicly in that process without potentially incurring exposure to liability. It is obvious that the foregoing events have engendered mistrust of the Police Department within the community.We need to take steps to restore trust and rebuild the good relationship that suffered some damage as a consequence of the Measure O ballot measure.As previously reported,the Police Chief is forming a police advisory board and will update Council on that project at a future meeting.As noted above,the City has recently implemented changes to the processing of public record requests and will be implementing other measures to assure transparency.Finally,it is hoped that the airing of this report will assist in bring closure to this issue and allow the community to heal and move on. Attachments: Synopsis of Evidence Respectfully Submitted by: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 8/20/2015Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ 1 Synopsis of 2015 Investigation City of Hermosa Beach Synopsis of Evidence 2015 Investigation City of Hermosa Beach Donna R. Evans, Esq. 2615 190th Street, Suite 210 Redondo Beach, CA 90278 310.684.3528 310.356.3111 facsimile donnaevans.legal.gmail.com 2 Synopsis of 2015 Investigation City of Hermosa Beach I. Synopsis of Evidence On March 3, 2015, a municipal election was conducted in the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”). Measure “O,” proposed the adoption of an ordinance that would approve oil and gas drilling and production by E&B Natural Resources Management Corporations (“E&B”) in the City’s maintenance yard at 555 Sixth Street. Interest groups actively campaigned for and against Measure “O.” The Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association (“HBPOA”) took a position in favor of Measure “O” and paid for political advertisements that advocated passage of the measure to fund “more patrols on the street and fund salaries equal to other cities to attract the best qualified police to Hermosa Beach.” The measure was ultimately defeated by a 79% to 21% margin. The evening of the election, Measure “O” opponents held a celebratory party at The Standing Room (“TSR”) restaurant and bar on Hermosa Avenue. Guests at TSR watched live news feed of the proceedings in the City Council and cheered as the votes were tabulated. Shortly before 9:00 p.m. that evening, Hermosa Beach resident Ron Siegel parked a van in the number one southbound lane on Hermosa Avenue, across from TSR. Attached to Mr. Siegel’s van was a trailer that carried an electric road sign that flashed anti-Measure “O” messages. In response to a complaint call about Mr. Siegel’s vehicle received at approximately 9:38 p.m., Hermosa Beach Police Department (“HBPD”) dispatched Officer George Brunn to the location. Brunn arrived at 10:05 p.m. and pulled up behind Siegel’s vehicle. Community Service Officer Tony Papandrea also responded to the location, and pulled his vehicle in behind Officer Brunn’s unit. A KTLA 5 news crew was on the scene at TSR, and conducted a live broadcast of the celebration between 10:07 and 10:10 p.m. The broadcast recorded the party-goers pumping their fists and chanting “No on O” in the background as the KTLA reporter was delivering her news story. The “No on ‘O’” chanting was also picked up on the unit- mounted camera in Officer Brunn’s vehicle Measure “O” opponent Chris Miller was at TSR celebrating the defeat of Measure “O” and taking pictures. Video surveillance from a camera at The Establishment reveals Ms. Miller walking on the sidewalk and in the parking lane in front of TSR between 10:07 p.m. and 10:11 p.m. Just after the KTLA broadcast concluded, at approximately 10:10:01 p.m., Ms. Miller shouted several comments to the Police Officers. The last 10 seconds of that broadcast audio1 picks up Ms. Miller saying, “Boo….fuck off you guys…” Ms. Miller’s voice can be heard on the recording that was captured by the unit-mounted camera in Officer Brunn’s vehicle. Ms. Miller said, “Boo, yoo-ooo/pieu, losers, fuck off! You guys, you lost! You guys are sore losers. You are not going to get a pay raise— come at us!” Male voices can be heard and one voice stated, “losers.” Ms. Miller yelled 1 References to what is seen and heard on the KTLA broadcast and Officer Brunn’s audio and video recordings were gathered from recordings that were professionally cleaned up (see, Methodology). 3 Synopsis of 2015 Investigation City of Hermosa Beach out at least three separate times and her voice is the loudest and clearest of all voices recorded. After Ms. Miler’s statements, she can be heard to say, “woo…” Other voices followed her words and joined her in saying, “woo.” The audio from unit-mounted camera in Officer Brunn’s vehicle does not reveal, to the extent that voices on the recording can be distinguished, the precise phrases “fuck the police” and “there go your fucking raises.” Specific words said by people on the east side of Hermosa Avenue cannot be distinguished. Accordingly, the Investigator could not confirm or rule out everything that Ms. Miller or others might have said to the HBPD officers that evening. It was not possible to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, exactly where Ms. Miller stood when she called out to the HBPD officers. It was also not possible to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, where people stood when they responded to Ms. Miller’s comments. After CSO Papandrea issued Mr. Siegel a ticket, Mr. Siegel and the HBPD officers left the scene. Officer Brunn subsequently spoke with Mr. Siegel two times that evening. In the first conversation, as their vehicles were stopped on Pier Avenue, Mr. Siegel greeted Officer Brunn. Officer Brunn told Mr. Siegel that he appreciated Mr. Siegel’s effort “out there.” They amicably discussed the parking situation and Officer Brunn can be heard chuckling. The second conversation, over an hour later, was captured on Officer Brunn’s body audio recorder. In that conversation, Mr. Siegel thanked Officer Brunn for “putting up with all the nonsense, man. It has been three long years, so…” Mr. Siegel also said, “We gotta’ have our fun. It was worth the ticket. No hard feelings.” Officer Brunn told him that he wished Mr. Siegel had been able to find curbside parking and Mr. Siegel replied that they tried [to find it]. Mr. Siegel thanked Officer Brunn who in turn wished Mr. Siegel a good night. The Watch Commander made a written record of the incident in the HBPD Daily Activity Report, noting that, “while the Officer’s were doing their job Chris Miller was taunting them from the bar; then others began to join in. Saying, “Police are poor losers, because they’re not getting a raise.” (sic) On March 4, 2015, the incident was reported up the HBPD chain of command. On March 6, 2015, Chief Papa contacted the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Board Chairman, Mr. Hartley, to discuss the impact of Ms. Miller’s behavior on the HBPD. On March 6, 2015, Mr. Hartley discussed the incident with Ms. Miller. In their conversation, Ms. Miller told Mr. Hartley she did not know what had happened, that she would have to call someone else to see what had happened, and that she would accept responsibility if she had made the comments. Mr. Hartley told Ms. Miller that her behavior on March 3, 2015 was inappropriate and she would have to deliver a written apology to the Police Department. On March 6, 2015, Officer Brunn was directed to prepare a memorandum detailing the incident. Officer Brunn submitted an email detailing the event on March 11, 2015. The 4 Synopsis of 2015 Investigation City of Hermosa Beach email stated that Ms. Miller yelled, “… something to the effect: ‘Hermosa Beach Police Officers, Losers, There go your raises.’ This was repeated numerous times in a loud boisterous voice; which encouraged many patrons on the patio of The Standing Room to join in yelling ‘Fuck the Police.’” The report states that Officer Brunn recognized Ms. Miller from other City events and believed that she was a member of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce. Officer Brunn reported that an unknown male put his arm around Ms. Miller and guided her back toward TSR entrance. Officer Papandrea was also directed to prepare a report of the incident, which he submitted via email on March 11, 2015. Officer Papandrea’s email stated that he heard a female yell, “there goes your fucking raises,” and that her voice stood out among the others. His report noted that others yelled out, but he could not make out what they said. On March 11, 2015, Chief Papa and Ms. Miller spoke about the incident. Ms. Miller agreed to provide a written apology. In a letter to Ms. Miller dated March 18, 2015, Mr. Hartley placed her on a “Corrective Action Plan” that included a twelve month probation and again directed her to send a written apology to the Police Department. He noted the conduct at issue was Ms. Miller’s chanting, “You’re not getting a raise” several times and that additional people may have joined the chant “though they may not have used the same words.” Thereafter, Ms. Miller left a voice message for Chief Papa that stated, “I wanted to let you know I’ll be writing my apology letter to you tomorrow. I had to wait until the Board meeting today to get permission to discuss this. I had signed a confidentiality agreement there and I just wanted to let you know I’m sorry for the delay but I will send that to you first think in the morning, Thank you and you have my number, or it’s xxx-xxx-xxxx. Thank you.” On March 20, 2015, Ms. Miller sent a letter to Chief Papa and offered an explanation for her behavior as expression of her personal opinions and not those of the Chamber. Ms. Miller’s letter said she had gotten caught up in the celebration and had expressed a personal opinion in response to “advertisements circulated in the public media.” She said her comment was not a reflection of the Chamber, and she was not representing the Chamber at that time. Ms. Miller’s letter does not include any apology. Mr. Hartley subsequently followed up with Chief Papa to inquire whether Ms. Miller’s apology had been received. Chief Papa’s letter of March 23, 2015 followed Mr. Hartley’s inquiry. In that letter, Chief Papa described Ms. Miller’s March 3, 2015 comments exactly as they were described in Officer Brunn’s March 11, 2015 report. Chief Papa’s letter stated that Ms. Miller had not apologized for her behavior and asked the Chamber Board to address the matter. Chief Papa stated that unless a written apology was received, it would be assumed that the Chamber condoned Ms. Miller’s unprofessional conduct. On April 2, 2015, the Chamber Board held a special meeting and voted unanimously to 5 Synopsis of 2015 Investigation City of Hermosa Beach remove Ms. Miller from the Board. She was given the opportunity to resign (in lieu of dismissal) if she sent a written apology, but she did not make any apology. Ms. Miller told the City Council in an April 14, 2015 letter that the only comment she had made on March 3, 2015 was “No raises today.” Ms. Miller sent an email to the Investigator on May 4, 2015, in which she stated that the only words she said to the “metermaid” were to facetiously call out “that there would be no raises today.” Ms. Miller has told others that was the only comment she made to HBPD officer that evening. Ms. Miller’s statements are contradicted by the recording from the unit-mounted camera in Officer Brunn’s vehicle and by the final seconds of the KTLA 5 broadcast. II. Methodology The Investigator interviewed twenty-nine persons in connection with the incident of March 3, 2015. The witnesses included several City employees, a representative of the Chamber of Commerce, a local businessperson, and numerous persons present at TSR on March 3, 2015. The majority of the interviews were conducted in person and audio recorded. Three witnesses were interviewed telephonically because of scheduling and availability issues. The Investigator had follow-up conversations with witnesses when it was necessary to clarify issues. Conclusions and factual findings based upon the witness interviews are integrated into the body of Investigative Summary Report. Ms. Miller and Mr. Siegel refused to meet with the Investigator to discuss the incident. The Investigator reviewed videotapes (without audio) from the surveillance cameras at the Establishment and TSR. The Investigator also reviewed the video and audio recording from Officer Brunn’s vehicle mounted camera. The Investigator also reviewed an audio recording captured by Officer Brunn’s body audio recorder, which picked up a conversation he had with Mr. Siegel more than an hour after the incident on Hermosa Avenue. The Investigator also reviewed and considered the KTLA 5 broadcast from TSR the evening of March 3, 2015. The Investigation was limited by the quality of the video and audio recordings, which made it impossible to hear and clearly distinguish all remarks directed at HBPD that evening. Professional audio and video enhancement was performed on the recordings to enlarge then as well as clean up and quiet background noises. The Investigator also used Audacity software to assist with deciphering the audio portions of the recordings. The Investigator considered the fact that many witnesses were adamant that Ms. Miller had never used the word “fuck” that night and that some stated they never heard anyone taunt the HBPD officers from TSR that evening. The recordings of the incident contradict those observations. It is highly likely that these witnesses were not near enough to Ms. Miller to clearly hear her comments when she made them. Ms. Miller’s comments commenced as the KTLA live broadcast concluded. Some of these witnesses were inside TSR when Ms. Miller and others called out to the HBPD officers 6 Synopsis of 2015 Investigation City of Hermosa Beach and the witnesses were therefore unable to hear all comments made to HBPD officers that evening. This Synopsis does not set forth any findings regarding any allegations of misconduct by any HBPD personnel. This Synopsis does not reach questions of law as to whether the conduct of any HBPD personnel violated any applicable laws or City policies, but instead addresses whether certain specified conduct occurred. The evidentiary standard used by the Investigator in reaching conclusions and findings in this report is that of a preponderance of the evidence, that is, it is more likely than not that the conduct occurred. ////// ////// ////// ////// ////// ////// ////// ////// ////// ////// Public Records Request City Clerk’s Office 1.Review/Log Request 2.Determine Appropriate Department 3.Forward Request to Department Department 1.Receive & Review Request 2.Gather/Produce Documents 3.Determine Whether Disclosable Disclosable (Forward to Clerk. Clerk Advises Requestor) 1. Make Documents Available to Review OR 2. Forward Documents to Requestor OR 3. Advise Requestor Additional Time Req’d. Question Re: Disclosable 1. Forward to CA 2. Advise City Clerk 3. City Clerk Advise Requestor of Delay Beyond 10 Days (Up to 14 Days) 4. CA Make Determination Disclosable (Forward to Clerk. Clerk Advise Requestor) 1. Make Documents Available for Review OR 2. Forward Documents to Requestor Not Disclosable (Notify Department & Clerk. Clerk Notifies Requestor) Within 10 Days 14 Day Extension Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0696 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OR SPECIAL ELECTION TO FILL THE CURRENT VACANCY ON THE CITY COUNCIL (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council: 1.Consider the following alternatives for filling the City Council vacancy resulting from Nanette Barragan’s resignation: a.Appoint a qualified person to serve the remainder of Ms. Barragan’s unexpired term; b.Call a special election to fill the vacancy; or c.Enact an ordinance to authorize an interim appointment until a special election is held to fill the vacancy for the remainder of the term. 2.Decide this evening which option is preferable, and direct the City Clerk to return with the documents necessary to implement that option - final action must occur within 60 days of the vacancy (by November 2, 2015). Background: A City Council vacancy has occurred due to the resignation (effective September 3, 2015) by Nanette Barragan who, pursuant to Government Code § 1750, submitted to the City Clerk her written resignation. At this time, there are about two years and two months remaining on Ms. Barragan’s term, which ends when the November 7, 2017 election results are certified and her successor has been sworn into office. Analysis: Pursuant to Government Code § 36512, the Council must, within 60 days from the commencement of the vacancy (by November 2, 2015) either fill the vacancy by appointment or call a special election to be held on the next regularly established election date (not less than 114 days from the election-call date), which is April 12, 2016. PLEASE NOTE: If the Council is deadlocked on whether to appoint or call a special election and takes no action within the 60 days after commencement of the vacancy, the City Clerk will be Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0696 required under State law to call a special election. This report identifies and addresses the options contained in the California Government Code and Elections Code for filling the vacancy of an unexpired term of office. Appointment Option: State law provides that the Council (by majority vote and no later than November 2, 2015) may appoint a successor to serve out the remainder of the four-year term to which Ms. Barragan was elected. The appointment process is used by many cities to fill vacancies, primarily due to the expense of conducting a stand-alone special election and the desire to have a full City Council seated as quickly as possible. The successor must be at least 18 years of age and both a Hermosa Beach resident and registered voter in order to qualify for a seat on the City Council, and may be appointed this evening or at a future meeting within the 60-day period, using whatever selection method the Council chooses, since none is prescribed by State law. 1.If the Council chooses to appoint an individual this evening (or at a future meeting within the 60-day window), without a formal selection process to fill the vacant seat, that person may be sworn and seated immediately. 2.If the Council chooses this evening to establish a selection method, perhaps soliciting applications, with interviews (either collectively, at an open public meeting, or one-by-one, as is done for board/commission applicants), the City Clerk will prepare/post appropriate notices (including Easy Reader publication on October 1) and make application forms available in the Clerk’s office and on the City’s website (samples will be provided at the meeting for Council review). After confirming eligibility, the City Clerk will provide each applicant with a copy of the City’s new Candidate Orientation Guide (prepared to provide this year’s Council candidates with general information about the City). If the Council pursues this alternative, the following actions must also be taken tonight: a.Set a filing deadline for the submittal of applications (suggest a week prior to the interviews); b.Schedule a meeting for the purpose of conducting applicant interviews (may be adjourned or special meetings for interviews and/or deliberations); and c.Decide on the meeting at which appointment will be made (suggest the regular meeting Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0696 of October 27, 2015 to allow maximum time for the process and still meet the November 2 deadline. Special Election Option: State law also allows the Council to call a special election to fill the vacancy. If this option is chosen, the City Clerk will prepare all necessary resolutions for Council adoption at the next meeting. Special elections are called to fill vacancies for various reasons, primarily to assure residents that their local officeholders are elected through the democratic process, or if Councilmembers are unable to agree on appointing a successor. Government Code § 36512 requires that a special election be held on the next regularly established election date not less than 114 days from the date of calling the election, which (pursuant to Elections Code § 1000) is Tuesday, April 12, 2016. This would be a stand-alone election conducted by the City, as was done March 3 of this year for the oil measure. Once called, the timing and mechanics of a special election to fill a vacancy vary little, if at all, from our general municipal elections. Nominations would open Monday, December 21, 2015 and close January 15, 2016. Martin and Chapman, the City’s election consultant estimates their cost for this special election would be about $43,500 ($6,000 less than for March 3) - in addition to the City’s cost for postage, poll workers, polling places, etc. - bringing the estimated total cost up to about $52,000 for a “polling place” special election. As an alternative to a “polling place” special election, Elections Code § 4004 provides that a “small city” (population of 100,000 or less) may conduct an “all-mail ballot” election to fill a Council vacancy, provided it is not held on the same date as a statewide primary or general election and is not consolidated with another election. The date of an all-mail ballot” election must be no less than 114 days from the date of calling the election, but is not restricted to the regularly established election dates specified in Elections Code § 1000, which would allow the election to take place in February (two months sooner). Martin and Chapman estimates the total cost would be about 15% less ($7,800) than a $52,000 polling place election, or 7% less ($3,640) if the City pays for return of the voted mail ballots via Business Reply which, as a general rule, increases turnout since voters would not have to bother with stamps. The obvious advantage of this option is the ability to conduct the election sooner. A disadvantage would be the staff time required to verify the signatures of all voters (or the cost if verification is outsourced). I do not know at this time if the cost savings achieved by eliminating poll workers, polling places and supplies is outweighed by the increased postage and signature verification costs. Apparently there is an Automated Signature Verification System that the City could rent that would save staff time, but I do not have cost information at this time. I will research the Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0696 issue and provide more information at the meeting. Interim Appointment Option: While the first two options are available by State law, without the need for additional action to implement them, this option would require the City to establish new policy. Under this provision, the Council may enact an ordinance stipulating that a person appointed to fill a Council vacancy would hold office only until the date of the special election, which would immediately be called to fill the remainder of the term, and must be held on the date of the next regularly established election not less than 114 days from the call of the special election (which is April 12, 2016). Because this option involves an ordinance, it requires two meetings (for introduction and adoption) and then 30 days to become effective, after which the Council would be able to make the interim appointment and call the special election - all of which must be completed within the 60 days, prior to November 2, 2015. Given the time constraints, it is not a viable option unless presented for adoption as an urgency ordinance to take effect immediately. If the Council were to choose this option, the required action this evening would be to direct staff to prepare an ordinance authorizing an interim appointment pending a special election, with direction to the City Clerk to prepare the resolutions necessary to call a special election for April 12, 2016. Fiscal Implications: There would be no fiscal impact if the Council opts to appoint a Hermosa resident (and registered voter) to fill the vacancy. An estimate for a special election is $52,000. Funding for a special election would come from the General Fund. Submitted by: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™ From: Claudia Berman [mailto:its_42@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 2:34 PM To: City Council; Elaine Doerfling Subject: Replacement for Nanette Barragan’s Seat Dear City Council, I'd think it is in the best interest of the city to hold a special election for Nanette Barragan's seat. An appointment will be divisive to the community. Thank you, Claudia Berman, Hermosa Beach Resident. Elaine, If it's not too late, please add this to the public record for Thursday's meeting. From: Jeffrey Davis [mailto:davis.jeffrey77@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 5:24 PM To: City Council Cc: Ann Yang Subject: Item 6.b Filling of City Council Vacancy Dear City Council Members: In the event that I am unable to attend this week's meeting, I am writing to urge you to schedule a Special Election to fill the open seat on the City Council. I believe it would be detrimental to the city to appoint someone for the balance of the term or to appoint someone on an interim basis. Either of these options, I believe, would circumvent the process of the people exercising their will, in fairly electing a representative to fill the open seat. Thank you for your time. Jeffrey Davis Hermosa Beach From: Nadine Gmail [mailto:nskyedavis@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 5:26 PM To: City Council Cc: Ann Yang Subject: Sept. 24th agenda 6.b Dear City Council Members, I believe it would be most beneficial and fair for the citizens of Hermosa Beach to vote for the council member required for Ms. Barragan's vacant seat. A special election would allow us, the citizens of Hermosa Beach, to have a say as to whom we believe would be best to serve on the Council. Thank you for your time! Sincerely, Nadine Skye-Davis Nskyedavis@gmail.com Hermosa Beach, CA From: Robert Fortunato [mailto:fortunato@forstrategy.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 5:55 AM To: City Clerk; Peter Tucker - External; carolyn@carolynpetty.com; Michael DiVirgilio; Hany Fangary Cc: Tom Bakaly Subject: Special Election Dear Elaine, Could you please make sure this letter gets entered into the record for our next City Council meeting on September 24th? Thank you! Honorable Mayor Petty, City Council and Staff, Given the general sense of mistrust and lack of transparency that the oil proposal and the incident with Chris Miller have spawned in our community, I would highly recommend a special election to replace the seat left vacant by Councilmember Barrrigan. If the city would like to save the expense of a special election, the only other reasonable option would be to appoint the person with the most votes in the last election. Any other option would cast suspicion and would not be good for our community's ability to move forward in a positive way. Respectfully, Robert Fortunato Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR MUNICIPAL MATTER ITEM 6.b. (FILLING THE CURRENT VACANCY ON THE CITY COUNCIL) (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council review the additional information provided to assist with deliberations on how to fill the vacancy resulting from Nanette Barragan’s September 3 resignation. Summary: My report for this item identified and addressed the options contained in the California Government Code and Elections Code for filling the vacancy of an unexpired term of office. The Council must act to either appoint or set a special election within 60 days of the vacancy, which is November 2, 2015. The last regular Council meeting before that deadline is Tuesday, October 27. Attached is a Timeline Comparison of the options permitted by State law to fill the vacancy. For the all-mail ballot option (allowable only for filling a vacancy), I chose Tuesday, February 16, 2016, which is the earliest possible election date, given the requirements that must be met: The election must take place no less than 114 days from the date it is called – if called on Tuesday, October 13, 2015, it may be held no sooner than Thursday February 4, 2016: An election notice must be published 113 – 127 days before the election – if called on Tuesday, October 13, I would send the notice to the Easy Reader on Thursday, October 15, for publication on Thursday, October 22 (nine days after the election is called). The resolution establishing candidate regulations must be adopted at least 120 days before the election to be effective at least seven days before the start of the nomination period, required to take place between 88 and 113 days before the election (from Monday, October 26 through Friday, November 20). The next regularly scheduled election date for a polling place election is April 12, 2016, which allows ample time for meeting all election deadlines. The election would have to be called within the 60-day window, but resolutions may be adopted at either of the October meetings. The option to appoint (with or without a formal selection process) needs no further explanation. The interim appointment option requires adoption of an urgency ordinance before appointing and setting the special election date, all of which must take place within the 60-day window (by November 2, 2015). Also attached is a Comparison of Past Elections, which looks at how our electorate chose to vote at the last six general municipal elections (I also included our March 3 special election on Measure O). The percentage of at-poll voters has been trending downward for our general elections, from 78% in 2003 to 56% in 2013, but it is clear that many of our voters still enjoy the experience of “going to the polls.” The Redondo Beach City Clerk expressed full satisfaction with all-mail ballot elections, especially when only one contest is on the ballot, citing cost savings and high voter turnout. The cost savings would come primarily from less printing and postage (since only one mailing would be necessary). The City of Redondo Beach paid for the return of the voted mail ballots via Business Reply to increase turnout. An outside source was hired to verify signatures. Martin and Chapman indicated that their automated signature machine would also scan the voter ID barcodes, thereby performing both tasks. The signature verification has a 70% approval rate, so I would have to visually verify the remainder. The machine rents for $3,000, has a $500 setup/installation/training fee, and a $0.30 per signature fee, which is less than the County fee of $0.95 per signature ($1.95 if not readily available). I am still not clear what, if any, the cost savings would be with an all-mail ballot election, but I am confident it would not exceed the cost of a polling place election, and would allow the successor to be seated two months earlier. I’ve also attached a draft application form for review, if the Council opts to appoint a successor using a selection method. Attachments: 1. Timeline Comparison 2. Comparison of Past Elections 3. Application for Appointment Submitted by: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk TIMELINE COMPARISON FOR FILLING COUNCIL VACANCY The chart below provides a timeline comparison between the appointment and election options presented in the staff report for filling the City Council vacancy of September 3, 2015. Council action to appoint or call a special election must be taken within 60 days of the vacancy, which is November 2, 2015. A special election must be no less than 114 days from the date the election is called. A polling-place election must take place at the next regularly scheduled election date, which is April 12, 2016. An all-mail ballot election may take place sooner, but must meet the 114-day requirement along with noticing and other requirements, which would be February 16, 2016 at the earliest. Special Election Feb. 16, 2016 April 12, 2016 Action Appointment All-Mail Ballot Polling Place Appoint 10/27/15 CC mtg. N/A N/A Interim Appointment (adopt urgency Ord at 10/13/15 mtg.) 10/27/15 CC mtg. Adopt election resos at 10/13/15 CC mtg. (Deadline 11/2/15) Adopt election resos at 10/27/15 CC mtg. (Deadline 11/2/15) Direct prep of resos for special election held at least 114 days from call date N/A Adopt election resos at 10/13/15 CC mtg. (at least 7 days prior to nominations) Adopt election resos at 10/13/15 mtg. or 10/27/15 mtg. Notice published by Clerk at least 113 days before election N/A To E.R. on 10/15/15 for publication by 10/22/15 To E.R. by 12/10/15 for publication by 12/17/15 Nomination period (113 to 88 days before election) N/A Oct. 26 – Nov. 20, 2015 Dec. 21, 2015 – Jan. 15, 2016 Clerk to canvass returns, CC to declare results N/A Results declared no later than the fourth Friday after election (03/11/16) Results declared no later than the fourth Friday after election (05/06/16) Councilmember sworn in & seated Immediately upon appointment Regular meeting of March 8, 2016 Special/Adjourned Regular meeting of May 5, 2016 COMPARISON OF PAST ELECTIONS Election Offices Number of Number of Registered Voter At Poll By Mail Date to Elect Candidates Measures Voters Turnout Voters Voters 11/04/03 2 Council 1 Clerk 1 Treasurer 8 Council (7+1 write-in) 1 Clerk 1 Treasurer 2 12,982 3,229 (25%) 2,520 (78%) 709 (22%) 11/08/05 3 Council 10 Council 1 13,364 6,181 (46%) 4,404 (71%) 1,777 (29%) 11/06/07 2 Council 1 Clerk 1 Treasurer 6 Council 1 Clerk 1 Treasurer 1 12,884 3,307 (26%) 2,269 (69%) 1,038 (31%) 11/03/09 3 Council 8 Council -0- 13,637 3,176 (23%) 1,869 (59%) 1,309 (41%) 11/08/11 2 Council 1 Clerk 1 Treasurer 4 Council 1 Clerk 2 Treasurer 2 13,275 2,967 (22%) 1,385 (47%) 1,582 (53%) 11/05/13 3 Council 1 Treasurer* 7 Council 2 Treasurer 1 13,682 5,047 (37%) 2,866 (56%) 2,181 (44%) 03/03/15 -0- N/A 1 14,064 7,515 (53%) 3,341 (45%) 4,168 (55%) *The City Treasurer office in the 11/05/13 election was to fill an unexpired two-year term City of Hermosa Beach Application for Appointment to City Council Vacancy Unexpired term ending November, 2017 All applicants must be residents and electors of the City of Hermosa Beach and at least 18 years old. The appointed Councilmember is required to file a Statement of Economic Interest (Form 700) pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974. Applications must be returned by 6:00 p.m. (date) City Clerk’s Office 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Name: (first) (middle) (last) Home Address: Phone: (home) (cell) (work) E-mail: Years resided at above address: Are you a registered voter? Have you lived at any other address during the past year? No Yes If yes, give previous address: Occupation: How Long: Employer: Employer Phone: Employer Address: (OPTIONAL) Please type or print in black ink. Attach additional pages as necessary. 1 Education School Major Graduation Date and Degree 2 Work History and Experience (or attach resume) Employer Job Title From To 3 Why do you think you should be appointed? What is there specifically in your background, training, education and interests that qualify you as a candidate? 4 Prior and Current Community/Civic Experience (include professional, charitable and community organizations, as well as elected/appointed public offices held) Organization Served From To Offices Held 5 Personal/Professional References – Names and Contact Information A B C D Conflict of Interest – Pursuant to California Government Code § 87200, a Statement of Economic Interests Form 700 must be filed by the appointee in the City Clerk’s Office within 30 days of assuming office. Information and forms are available online at the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) website at www.fppc.ca.gov Eligibility – Applicants must be at least 18 years of age and registered voters of the City, continuously, for at least 30 days prior to the time of appointment. Additional factors for consideration may include, but are not limited to, an understanding of issues facing the City, active civic leadership, and community service. In addition to attending and preparing for regular City Council business, the selected applicant must be available to actively participate on various internal subcommittees and external agencies as a representative of the City of Hermosa Beach. Instructions – Completed applications must be received by the City Clerk’s Office by 6:00 p.m. on (day), October (date), 2015, located in Room 203 of the Hermosa Beach City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. A PDF version of the signed and completed application packet may be emailed to City Clerk Elaine Doerfling at edoerfling@hermosabch.org by the deadline, with a hard copy mailed or delivered to the City Clerk within 24 hours. The email date will suffice to establish meeting the deadline. The City Clerk will acknowledge receipt of your application. There are no exceptions for the receipt of the required information by the deadline. Interviews – Eligible applicants will be interviewed at a meeting of the City Council on (day), (date), 2015. The time for the meeting will be publicly noticed after the application submission deadline, based upon the number of applications received. There will be no accommodations made for applicants unable to attend the interview. Public Information – Any and all information provided as a part of this process, including but not limited to the application and supporting documentation, unless specifically exempt by statute, is public information. I will accept the office if appointed: (Signature) Date: DECLARATION OF APPLICANT I hereby certify that: (1) all statements in the application and attachments are true and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; (2) I am qualified to serve as a member of the Hermosa Beach City Council, since I legally reside in the City, I am 18 years of age or older, and have been continuously registered to vote in Hermosa Beach for at least 30 days; and (3) I will accept the office in the event of my appointment. I understand that my application and materials will be considered a public record. Signature Date Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0690 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 COMMUNITY POLICE ADVISORY BOARD UPDATE (Police Chief Sharon Papa) Recommended Action: It is recommended that City Council confirm staff moving forward with the Community Police Advisory Board. Summary: OVERVIEW The City of Hermosa Beach has identified in its strategic plan that it remains committed to a safe community. This includes becoming more engaged with our citizens. Utilizing Chief Sharon Papa and her experience with the Los Angeles Police Department, the City has been diligent the past two years in having our police staff more present within the community by inviting residents to visit the Hermosa Beach Police Department during its first open house in more than a decade, connecting directly with residents with a booth at Fiesta Hermosa, expanding our Coffee with a Cop and Pizza with the Police programs throughout the year, and creating programs with agency partners to address underage drinking in the South Bay. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS & ENGAGEMENT The Hermosa Beach Police Department has recently been reorganized to continue our greater emphasis on Community Outreach. A new Community Services Division Manager position was created last year to provide greater oversight to existing programs and to develop new programs. A master calendar of events has been created to ensure all members of the police department are aware of upcoming events and are able to adjust their schedules to attend as appropriate. Other new programs will be rolled out in coming months. This includes the creation of a Community Police Advisory Board (CPAB). The Chief of Police has successfully worked with LAPD CPAB programs in the past. During the 2015 Strategic Planning Session, the Chief informed Council of her intent to establish one in Hermosa Beach. The purpose of a CPAB is to provide a regularly scheduled forum for a cross section of the community to meet with the police department to discuss issues important to them and solve problems as they arise. The Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0690 main goal is for the community to directly provide concerns to police staff, with HBPD then reviewing the items raised and executing programs if warranted to resolve issues. Members of the CPAB are invited by the Chief of Police to participate in order to ensure there is a cross section of disciplines, including schools, faith based organizations, businesses, neighborhood watch members, etc. The meetings are usually held monthly at the police station. Agendas are developed by the CPAB members based upon current crime trends and topics of interest to public safety. Once established, some CPABs take on a project such as a community clean-up, organizing a school safety presentation or some other activity to generate interaction with police department employees and the community. The CPAB members will determine the direction they wish to go once established. Invitations to join the Hermosa Beach Community Police Advisory Board were extended and accepted by the following people: ·Rachel Nyback ·Janice Webb ·Pat Escalante ·George Schmeltzer ·Ryan Nowicki ·Sheryl Main ·Dennis Jarvis ·Stacey Armato ·Charles Howell ·Becky Scholten ·Marie Rice Several other more formal versions of Community Advisory Boards and Oversight Commissions exist in other, larger cities. Those Board members are political appointments for set terms, requiring staff support to comply with all public meeting requirements, agenda postings, minutes, etc. South Bay cities do not have formal Community Advisory Boards or Commissions with the exception of the City of Redondo Beach. Redondo Beach has a seven member Public Safety Commission that meets bi- monthly. One member is appointed to represent each Council District. It was created to promote crime prevention in the city and initially focused on graffiti related crime. This type of advisory board Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0690 requires a significant commitment of staff time and therefore is not recommended. However, should Council wish to pursue this more formal configuration, staff will have to conduct additional research and return at a future Council meeting. The CPAB concept as proposed should work well in Hermosa Beach. As the police department enhances outreach programs in the community, the CPAB will provide community leaders a regular forum to interact with the police chief and other department employees on a regular basis. Bi-annual or annual presentations can be made during Council meetings to report on CPAB activities. Respectfully Submitted by: Sharon Papa, Police Chief Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0698 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 DIRECTION REGARDING THE CITY’S NOTICE PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES/EVENTS AS NEEDED (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) (Staff Report Amended 9-21-15 at 12:00pm) Recommended Action: Direct staff to implement the action plan below with the objective to enhance public noticing and awareness of public meetings. Background: At the July 28 the Council affirmed that providing advance public notice is a high priority, and further gave some suggestions for improving the City’s current procedures focused on improving notice for public meetings, and increasing public awareness of upcoming meetings and pending decisions. On September 15 the Planning Commission discussed this issue as it relates to Planning Commission meetings and also provided suggested improvements. Analysis: The following is a recommend Action Plan to improve the City’s public noticing based on input from Council, the Planning Commission, and Staff. This Action Plan is intended to be an evolving plan with the continuing goal of improving community engagement and access to the decision making process. PIO will create advertisements on behalf of the City and submit to the local newspapers at least two weeks prior to hearings. Use Cable Access channel(s) to get meeting notices out. Use keywords and common language for clear agenda item descriptions. Standardize mailers, include city logo, and consider using colored envelopes/cards. Greater attention to future agenda item list Include Planning Commission future agenda items in Council agenda Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/21/2015Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0698 Enhance e-notification feature on website, promote its use Implement a City social media page/site Communication sub-committee informed of all upcoming meetings to provide direction on appropriate outreach Bi-annual CUP reviews will be noticed as full public hearing in local newspaper Applicants will be held accountable for posted notices visibility during the posting period All mailed notices to be verified (no hand delivery) Planning Commission to review notification procedures for slope determinations Attachments: 1.SUPPLEMENTAL Memorandum from Community Development Director Ken Robertson dated 9-21-15 2.Staff Report for Planning Commission Meeting of 9-15-15 3.Staff Report for City Council Meeting of 7-28-15 4.Letter from Jeff Miller submitted by Hany Fangary as a Supplemental to 7-28-15 Staff Report Respectfully Submitted by: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/21/2015Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0698 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 DIRECTION REGARDING THE CITY’S NOTICE PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES/EVENTS AS NEEDED (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: Affirm that public noticing for public meetings, events, and activities continue to be a high priority consistent with City goals, affirming support of current practices of providing notice both as required by law, and as a general courtesy prior to City Council and Commission decisions, and prior to events or public construction projects. Direct that departments include the full cost of noticing in the upcoming user fee study for all city services where noticing is required or desired, including but not limited to pending decisions on private applications for development projects, certain private construction activities, and privately sponsored events. Alternatively the Council may want to provide direction on any specific concerns about noticing practice that warrants further evaluation. Background: At the May 12, 2015 meeting during “other matters”, Councilmember Fangary brought up this issue as follows: REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY TO EVALUATE AND PROVIDE DIRECTION REGARDING THE CITY’S NOTICE PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES/EVENTS AS NEEDED. EVALUATION AND DIRECTION SHOULD BE PROVIDED REGARDING THE MANNER OF PROVIDING NECESSARY NOTICES, AND PAYMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH NOTICES.(Continued from Meeting of April 14, 2015) (<http://hermosabeach.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=6&clip_id=3720>) Councilmembers DiVirgilio and Barragan concurred with Councilmember Fangary for staff to return with an evaluation of public noticing procedures in general and the related payment responsibility when notices are provided for the benefit of private applicants or event sponsors.Specific concern was also noted about whether adequate noticing is being provided for Planning Commission review of convex slope grade determinations, and concerns had been previously expressed about noticing for beach volleyball events or use of beach volleyball courts. In the 2015 Strategic Plan both the Vision and Goals address the issue of public noticing and providing public Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0698 information and outreach in several ways: The City’s Vision includes Guiding Principle 2, “Hometown Spirit”, which means, among other things, “Residents and community base belong to, are engaged in, and contribute to our community”. The City’s Goals include “High Performing City Providing 1st Class Services,” and one of the priority objectives is listed as “Easier access and tracking to City service and service requests through technology and improved processes”. Also related is the “Public Information and Communications Plan”,which was adopted in March 2015, and addresses informing the public in several ways both through technology and media relations including the following related to critical issues: Critical Issues Communications Protocol Hermosa Beach has a number of critical issues that have the potential to divide the community. In order to dispel rumors and disrupt misinformation from reaching the public, the proper channels of communication need to be effectively utilized and the City’s key messages must reach the press in a timely manner. Knowing this, the City’s PIO has worked alongside the City Manager and the Council’s Communications Subcommittee (Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem) to create the following: ·Identification of critical issues ·Communications protocol surrounding issues ·Key messages regarding issues ·Opportunity for Elected Officials/City Leadership quotes on issues With critical issues, timing is of the utmost importance for response to media and the community. We recommend the following protocol based upon the various ways that an issue comes into the spotlight within the community. City Council Meetings Should Council arrive at a decision that greatly impacts the greater community, or concludes with a decision that has been a longstanding issue and/or debate within the community, the following steps should be taken post-meeting: ·City Manager to provide overview of Council Decision to PIO ·Mayor and/or Mayor Pro Tem to issue quotes via email as soon as possible to PIO The PIO shall then use discretion to advise City Manager and Communications Subcommittee of the following: ·Provide a statement to the press and not issue a press release ·Draft a press release, and utilize it for media and community relations (via website, Nixle, etc.) ·Distribute communications and monitor media for feedback / errors in news reporting ·Report results/feedback to City Manager and Communications Subcommittee; PIO to suggest follow up items/strategy (if needed). This could include tactics such as media desk-side briefings on topics, community presentations, community advertisements, mailers, etc. Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 2 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0698 City Hearings The City Manager, Council Communications Subcommittee and the PIO have agreed that additional efforts/budgets should be allocated for increased awareness for Public Hearings/Council meetings. Once the date of the hearing has been determined, the PIO will create advertisements on behalf of the City and submit to the local newspapers (The Beach Reporter, Easy Reader) at least two weeks prior to the hearing. Analysis: The City Council, Commissions, and Department staff are charged with making recommendations or decisions on a wide variety of laws, policies, projects, events and activities. Each type of decision or activity comes with a set of State and local laws and practices designed to ensure that the public and likely interested parties are informed and thus enabled to participate in the decision making process or made aware of events or activities. Also, where the law may not cover it, we operate on the assumption, consistent with our vision and goals, that more public notice typically is better. However, there is always some judgment as to how much notice is appropriate, and the appropriate method for noticing or timing, and the cost effectiveness of the noticing, and when to re-notice continued items. Further, we have recently enhanced outreach and noticing with the new tools we have available with our web site, email notifications, and social media. Additionally, by retaining a Public Information Officer we also frequently outreach to the media to enhance public awareness of any pending decisions, major projects, or events. In conferring amongst various department staff, including the City Clerk’s office, given that we have clear direction that public noticing, outreach, and engagement is a high priority, we believe it is most effective that each department and their Commissions do the hard work of determining the amount and type of noticing that makes the most sense for their respective decision making processes, or activities that warrant notice. We neither see the immediate need nor think the staff resources are available for a comprehensive evaluation of all City procedures with respect to improving public outreach and noticing, and don’t believe there is a one-size-fits-all approach. As an example, the attached table represents the variety of notices and different approaches the Community Development Department has developed to address legal obligations, City policy, cost effectiveness, and targeting the appropriate audience. We have already included cost recovery for public noticing in the fees submitted by private applicants. A recent example of the issues and challenges with noticing is the recent Planning Commission hearing for the wireless facilities proposed by AT&T at the Kiwanis building. Staff followed our policies and legal obligations, and noticed over 500 residents/property owners using the Valley Park boundaries, which actually exceed our legal obligations.1 Based on the participation and turnout at the hearing, it was arguably more than adequate--yet several who did participate expressed that the notice was inadequate. The question of payment or re-imbursement from privately initiated projects or events that may either require or need public notice will be more fully evaluated in the user fee study scheduled for this Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 3 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0698 fiscal year. For example, all fees for development projects processed by the Community Development Department will continue to include cost recovery for all types of public notices required and provided. Also, cost recovery should be included for noticing the Parks and Recreation Commission decisions for special events, as well as providing proper notice regarding the events themselves, and cost recovery for some Public Works Department items such as establishment of disabled access parking spaces and parkway tree removal where notice is provided to affected neighbors. Parks and Recreation Commission Special Events and Volleyball The Parks and Recreation Commission recently created a Special Events/Beach Volleyball Subcommittee that is tasked with making a final recommendation to City Council on policy updates to both special events and the overall beach volleyball court use. Part of this recommendation will include the process for special event approvals and requests for new volleyball courts and whether or not a public hearing with a pre-determined level of noticing should be required for both. Currently noticing practices are department policy and not required by municipal code. A recommended policy will be presented in October 2015. Planning Commission Review of Slope and Grade Determinations In regards to the specific question related to Planning Commission determinations on the technical review of grade and whether a particular lot is a convex slope, the noticing approach has evolved based on explicit direction from the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission evaluation on these types of requests is very different than most of the entitlements processed (i.e. CUP’s, Variances, Parking Plans, Precise Development Plans) since it an exception and technical interpretation allowed under the code and, as such, there is no legal requirement for notification. Nonetheless, the Commission has adopted a courtesy notice procedure where staff posts the property with orange placards paid for the by the applicant. The noticing has been expanded so that all sides of any alley/street properties are posted. 1The public noticing provided for the proposed wireless facility at the Kiwanis Club was consistent with State Law (300- foot mailing to property owners) and our adopted practices which exceed State law of noticing all property owners and occupants within 500 feet of the site. We also went a step further and noticed everyone within 500 feet from the boundaries of Valley Park; this resulted in over 500 residents/property owners being notified by mail. Also, the Kiwanis building was posted with visible orange placards, and it was noticed in the local newspaper, as well as published in the agenda on our web site. Attachments: 1. Matrix of Public Noticing for Planning Commission Meeting of 9-15-15 2. Staff Report on Public Noticing for Planning Commission Meeting of 9-15-15 3. Staff Report on Public Noticing for City Council Meeting of 7-28-15 4. Matrix of Public Noticing for City Council Meeting of 7-28-15 5. Supplemental Letter from Jeff Miller on Public Noticing for City Council Meeting of 7-28-15 Respectfully Submitted by: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 4 of 5 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0698 Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 5 of 5 powered by Legistar™ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date: September 21, 2015 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Ken Robertson, Director, Community Development Department Subject: Supplemental – Municipal Matters Item 6(d): Direction Regarding the City’s Notice Procedures for Public Meetings and Other Activities/Events As Needed An old staff report was inadvertently downloaded into the agenda packets instead of the current staff report. The agenda packet has been amended to now show the correct staff report. We apologize for the inconvenience. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date: September 21, 2015 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Ken Robertson, Director, Community Development Department Subject: Supplemental – Municipal Matters Item 6(d): Direction Regarding the City’s Notice Procedures for Public Meetings and Other Activities/Events As Needed An old staff report was inadvertently downloaded into the agenda packets instead of the current staff report. The agenda packet has been amended to now show the correct staff report. We apologize for the inconvenience. Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2015 DIRECTION REGARDING THE CITY’S NOTICE PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES/EVENTS AS NEEDED (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: Affirm that public noticing for public meetings, events, and activities continue to be a high priority consistent with city goals, affirming support of current practices of providing notice both as required by law, and as a general courtesy prior to City Council and Commission decisions, and prior to events or public construction projects. Direct that departments include the full cost of noticing in the upcoming user fee study for all city services where noticing is required or desired, including but not limited to pending decisions on private applications for development projects, certain private construction activities, and privately sponsored events. Alternatively the Council may want to provide direction on any specific concerns about noticing practice that warrants further evaluation. Background: At the May 12, 2015 meeting during “other matters”, Councilmember Fangary brought up this issue as follows: REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY TO EVALUATE AND PROVIDE DIRECTION REGARDING THE CITY’S NOTICE PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES/EVENTS AS NEEDED. EVALUATION AND DIRECTION SHOULD BE PROVIDED REGARDING THE MANNER OF PROVIDING NECESSARY NOTICES, AND PAYMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH NOTICES.(Continued from Meeting of April 14, 2015) (http://hermosabeach.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=6&clip_id=3720) DiVirgilio and Barragan concurred with Fangary for staff to return with an evaluation of public noticing procedures in general and the related payment responsibility when notices are provided for the benefit of private applicants or event sponsors.Specific concern was also noted about whether adequate noticing is being provided for Planning Commission review of convex slope grade determinations, and concerns had been previously expressed about noticing for beach volleyball events or use of beach volleyball courts. In the 2015 Strategic Plan both the Vision and Goals address the issue of public noticing and providing File #:REPORT 15-0587,Version:1 Hermosa Beach Printed on 7/30/2015Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™ File #:REPORT 15-0587,Version:1 public information and outreach in several ways: The City’s Vision includes Guiding Principle 2, “Hometown Spirit”, which means, among other things, “Residents and community based belong to, are engaged in, and contribute to our community”. The City’s Goals include “High Performing City Providing 1st Class Services,” and one of the priority objectives is listed as “Easier access and tracking to City service and service request through technology and improved processes” Also related is the “Public Information and Communications Plan”,which was adopted in March 2015, and addresses informing the public in several ways both through technology and media relations including the following related to critical issues: Critical Issues Communications Protocol Hermosa Beach has a number of critical issues that have the potential to divide the community. In order to dispel rumors and disrupt misinformation from reaching the public, the proper channels of communication need to be effectively utilized and the City’s key messages must reach the press in a timely manner. Knowing this, the City’s Public Information Officer (PIO) has worked alongside the City Manager and the Council’s Communications Subcommittee (Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem) to create the following: ·Identification of critical issues ·Communications protocol surrounding issues ·Key messages regarding issues ·Opportunity for Elected Officials / City Leadership quotes on issues With critical issues, timing is of the utmost importance for response to media and the community. We recommend that following protocol based upon the various ways that an issue comes into the spotlight within the community. City Council Meetings Should Council arrive at a decision that greatly impacts the greater community, or concludes with a decision that has been a longstanding issue and/or debate within the community, the following steps should be taken post-meeting: ·City Manager to provide overview of Council Decision to PIO ·Mayor and/or Mayor Pro Tem to issue quotes via email as soon as possible to PIO The PIO shall then use discretion to advise City Manager and Communications Subcommittee of the following: ·Provide a statement to the press and not issue a press release ·Draft a press release, and utilize it for media and community relations (via website, Nixle, etc.) ·Distribute communications and monitor media for feedback / errors in news reporting ·Report results/feedback to City Manager and Communications Subcommittee; PIO to suggest follow up items / strategy (if needed). This could include tactics such as media deskside briefings on topics, community presentations, community advertisements, mailers, etc. Hermosa Beach Printed on 7/30/2015Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™ File #:REPORT 15-0587,Version:1 City Hearings The City Manager, Council Communications Subcommittee and the PIO have agreed that additional efforts / budgets should be allocated for increased awareness for Public Hearings / Council meetings. Once the date of the hearing has been determined, the PIO will create advertisements on behalf of the City and submit to the local newspapers (The Beach Reporter, Easy Reader) at least two weeks prior to the hearing. Analysis: The City Council, Commissions, and Department staff are charged with making recommendations or decisions on a wide variety of laws, policies, projects, events and activities. Each type of decision or activity comes with a set of State and local laws and practices designed to ensure that the public and likely interested parties are informed and thus enabled to participate in the decision making process or made aware of events or activities. Also, where the law may not cover it, we operate on the assumption, consistent with our vision and goals, that the more public notice typically is better. However, there is always some judgment as to how much notice is appropriate, and the appropriate method for noticing or timing, and the cost effectiveness of the noticing, and when to re-notice continued items. Further, we have recently enhanced outreach and noticing with the new tools we have available with our web site, email notifications, and social media. Further by retaining a Public Information Officer we also frequently outreach to the media to enhance public awareness of any pending decisions, major projects, or events. In conferring amongst various department staff, including the City Clerk’s office, given that we have clear direction that public noticing, outreach, and engagement is a high priority, we believe it is most effective that each department and their Commissions do the hard work of determining the amount and type of noticing that makes the most sense for their respective decision making processes, or activities that warrant notice. We neither see the immediate need nor think the staff resources are available for a comprehensive evaluation of all city procedures with respect to improving public outreach and noticing, and don’t believe there is a one-size-fits-all approach. As an example, the attached table represents the variety of notices and different approaches the Community Development Department has developed to address legal obligations, city policy, cost effectiveness, and targeting the appropriate audience. We have already included cost recovery for public noticing in the fees submitted by private applicants. A recent example of the issues and challenges with noticing is the recent Planning Commission hearing for the wireless facilities proposed by AT&T at the Kiwanis building. Staff followed our policies and legal obligations, and noticed over 500 residents/property owners using the Valley Park boundaries, which actually exceed our legal obligations.1 Based on the participation and turnout at the hearing, it was arguably more than adequate--yet several who did participate expressed that the notice was inadequate. The question of payment or re-imbursement from privately initiated projects or events that may either require or need public notice will be more fully evaluated in the user fee study scheduled for this fiscal year. For example all fees for development projects processed by the Community Development Department will continue to include cost recovery for all types of public notices required Hermosa Beach Printed on 7/30/2015Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™ File #:REPORT 15-0587,Version:1 and provided. Also cost recovery should be included for noticing the Parks and Recreation Commission decisions for special events, as well as providing proper notice regarding the events themselves, and cost recovery for some Public Works Department items such as establishment of disabled access parking spaces and parkway tree removal where notice is provided to affected neighbors. Parks and Recreation Commission Special Events and Volleyball The Parks and Recreation Commission recently created a Special Events/Beach Volleyball Subcommittee that is tasked with making a final recommendation to City Council on policy updates to both special events and the overall beach volleyball court use. Part of this recommendation will include the process for special event approvals and requests for new volleyball courts and whether or not a public hearing with a pre-determined level of noticing should be required for both. Currently noticing practices are department policy and not required by municipal code. A recommended policy will be presented in October 2015. Planning Commission Review of Slope and Grade Determinations In regards to the specific question related to Planning Commission determinations on the technical review of grade and whether a particular lot is a convex slope, the noticing approach has evolved based on explicit direction from the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission evaluation on these types of requests is very different than most of the entitlements processed (i.e. CUP’s, Variances, Parking Plans, Precise Development Plans) since it an exception and technical interpretation allowed under the code and, as such, there is no legal requirement for notification. Nonetheless, the Commission has adopted a courtesy notice procedure where staff posts the property with the orange placards paid for the by the applicant. The noticing has been expanded so that all sides of any alley/street properties are posted. 1The public noticing provided for the proposed wireless facility at the Kiwanis Club was consistent with State Law (300- foot mailing to property owners) and our adopted practices which exceed state law of noticing all property owners and occupants within 500-feet of the site. We also went a step further and noticed everyone within 500 feet from the boundaries of Valley Park, this resulted in over 500 residents/property owners being notified by mail. Also, the Kiwanis building was posted with visible orange placards, and it was noticed in the local newspaper, as well as published in the agenda on our web site. Attachments: 1. Matrix of Public Noticing (Community Development Department) Respectfully Submitted by: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Concur:Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk Viki Copeland, Finance Director Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director Kelly Orta, Senior Recreation Supervisor Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 7/30/2015Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0676 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 APPOINTMENT OF CITY MANAGER COMPENSATION NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE (City Attorney Mike Jenkins) Recommended Action: The City Council select two of its members to serve as an ad hoc negotiating committee to negotiate with the City Manager as necessary in connection with consideration of his 2015 bonus and 2016 compensation. Background: Paragraph 5 of the City Manager’s Employment Agreement provides that annually on the anniversary of his employment with the City,the City Council will perform a performance evaluation and will consider whether to award him a merit bonus for the preceding year and whether to increase his salary or make any other contract modifications for the ensuing year.September 4,2015 is the third anniversary of the City Manager’s employment with the City.The Brown Act contemplates that the Council will select a negotiator as may be necessary to negotiate these matters on the City’s behalf. The City Council has commenced the City manager’s annual performance evaluation.It is now necessary that the Council appoint a negotiator.The Council may appoint one of its members,a two -member ad hoc committee,a lawyer or a professional labor negotiator to serve as its negotiator relative to the City Manager’s compensation. Respectfully Submitted by: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0682 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS - SEPTEMBER 2015 (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Council: (1) appoint committee delegates and alternates; (2) adopt the attached resolution if SBCCOG delegate/alternate changes are made; (3) add and/or delete any temporary subcommittees, as deemed appropriate; and (4) approve the list of committee assignments, as amended this evening. Background: At its meeting of September 8, 2015, the City Council acted to appoint the following: ·Mayor (term ending Tuesday, June 24, 2016):Carolyn Petty ·Mayor Pro Tempore (same term as Mayor):Hany Fangary ·L.A. County City Selection Committee:Delegate:Mayor Petty ·South Bay Cities Sanitation District:Delegate:Mayor Petty Alternate:Councilmember Tucker The appointment of delegates and alternates for the remaining committee assignments (consistent with the Council’s policy of maintaining permanent representation whenever possible) was postponed to this meeting. The attached committee-assignment list has been updated to reflect the September 3 resignation of former Councilmember Nanette Barragan and the above-noted changes made at the September 8 meeting. The following two committees require the adoption of resolutions for delegate/alternate appointment changes: 1.Independent Cities Risk Management Association (ICRMA) - The current Resolution No. 15-6968 (adopted June 23, 2015) designated Interim Human Resources Director Robert A. Blackwood as delegate (replacing former director Diane Strickfaden), with Personnel Assistant Monica Bagnara as alternate. A resolution replacing Mr. Blackwood with the permanent Human Resources Director as delegate will be presented (as a consent Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0682 calendar item) for adoption at a future meeting once that person has assumed office. 2.South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) - The current Resolution No. 15- 6935 (adopted January 13, 2015) designated Council-members DiVirgilio and Fangary as delegate and alternate, respectively. If the Council makes changes this evening, the names of the newly appointed delegate and alternate will be appropriately inserted into the attached draft resolution upon adoption this evening. If no changes are made at this time, a resolution will be presented for Council reorganization following the November 3 election and subsequent seating of the newly elected Councilmembers. After the assignments of committee delegates and alternates have been made, letters will be sent to the appropriate boards and committees, and the finalized list of newly appointed delegates and alternates will be forwarded to the City Council. Attachments: 1.Updated List of Committee Assignments 2.Committee Information Report 3.Draft SBCCOG Resolution Submitted by: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk Concur: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ REORGANIZATION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE APPOINTMENTS Watershed Advisory Council of Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission Delegate Tucker (Meetings at least once a year, as called, usually afternoons at Dockweiler Youth Alternate Fangary Center, 12505 Vista del Mar, Los Angeles) Independent Cities Association Delegate Fangary (Annual winter and summer seminars for delegates) [Board members meet 2nd Thursday Alternate Barragan at 700 N. Alameda St., Los Angeles] Independent Cities Risk Management Association Delegate Blackwood (Bimonthly - Downey) Alternate Bagnara RESOLUTION NO. 15- 6968 League of California Cities – L.A. County Division Delegate Tucker (1st Thurs. Jan./March/May - 6 p.m., locations vary, but usually Luminarias Restaurant - Monterey Park, Alternate Barragan other League/Division/committee events as called) Los Angeles County/City Selection Committee (Mayor must appoint alternate separately, each time, when unable to attend meeting) Delegate (Mayor)Petty (as called) Metropolitan Transportation Authority City Selection Committee Delegate Tucker (as called) Alternate Barragan South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) Delegate DiVirgilio (4th Thurs., 6 p.m., 20285 Western Ave., Torrance) Alternate Fangary RESOLUTION NO. 15-6935 SBCCOG Steering Committee Delegate/Alternate See above (2nd Mon., 12 p.m., 20285 Western Ave., Torrance) Page 1 of 2 Appointments 06-23-15 (As Amended 09-08-15) South Bay Cities Sanitation District (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles) Delegate (Mayor)Petty Alternate Tucker (3rd Wed. - 1:30 p.m., Torrance City Hall) Southern California Association of Governments Delegate Barragan (Annual, as called) West Basin Water Association Delegate Tucker (1st Tues., 11:30 a.m., Carson Community Center) Alternate Barragan Hermosa Beach Sister City Association Delegate DiVirgilio (1st Mon. – 7 p.m., Community Center, Room 9) Alternate Barragan TEMPORARY COUNCIL SUB-COMMITTEES Beach Cities Health District Councilmember Tucker City-School District Partnership [Formed 5/28/98] Councilmember Petty Councilmember DiVirgilio Public Communications [Formed 03-13-12] Mayor Petty Mayor Pro Tempore Fangary Special Olympics Host Town [Formed 01-27-15] DELETE Mayor Barragan Mayor Pro Tempore Petty Page 2 of 2 Appointments 06-23-15 (As Amended 09-08-15) Page 1 of 3 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE INFORMATION Watershed Advisory Council of Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission The Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission was established by the California Legislature in 2002 to monitor, assess, coordinate and advise the activities of state programs, and to oversee funding that affects the beneficial uses, restoration and enhancement of Santa Monica Bay and its watersheds. The Watershed Advisory Council serves as an advisory body to the Governing Board of the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission. Representatives serving on the Council include local, state and federal elected officials, public agencies responsible for protecting the resources and water quality of the Bay, the business community, along with environmental and other community groups. The Watershed Advisory Council meetings take place in the afternoon (usually 1-4 p.m.) at least once per year, as called (usually February, March or April), at Dockweiler Youth Center, 12505 Vista del Mar, Los Angeles. Independent Cities Association The ICA was established by full-service cities (those with their own police/fire services) to represent their interests – to educate and advocate for member cities in the Los Angeles region on shared issues to preserve and enhance local government. There are two annual seminars for delegates – in 2014, the winter one took place in Santa Barbara in February, and the summer one took place in Rancho Bernardo in July. (Board members typically have evening meetings on the second Thursday of each month at the Metropolitan Water District Building, 700 Alameda Street, Los Angeles) Independent Cities Risk Management Association The ICRMA specializes in loss-preventive risk control programs and opportunities to reduce the costs of municipal risk management. At the last Committee reorganization, the Council appointed staff members to serve as delegate and alternate (as many other member cities have done), since specific risk management expertise is desirable and meetings occur during the day. The Joint Powers Agreement allows but does not require a member of the Council to represent the City on the ICRMA Governing Board. League of California Cities – L.A. County Division The League’s mission is to expand and protect local control for cities through education and advocacy to enhance quality of life for all Californians. The Board of Directors is responsible for the overall supervision, control and direction of the League. Page 2 of 3 The Los Angeles County Division, which provides members with the opportunity to exchange ideas/information and share the advantages of cooperative advocacy, holds general membership meetings on the first Thursday during the months of January, March and May, with a reception at 6 p.m. followed by the program at 6:30 or 6:45 p.m. Locations may vary, but usually take place at Luminarias Restaurant in Monterey Park. Any Division member may also apply for a one-year appointment to one of eight policy committees, meeting a maximum of four times per year, to help set League priorities and policies. Additional events include the League’s annual conference in September. Los Angeles County/City Selection Committee This organization is comprised of mayors of Los Angeles County cities. Its function is to appoint city representatives to Boards/Commission/Agencies (as required by law) such as South Coast Air Quality Management District, LAFCO, L.A. City Hazardous Waste Management Advisory Committee, L.A. County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and to nominate for appointment members to the California Coastal Commission. Meetings take place as called. Unlike other committees that have both an assigned delegate and alternate, the mayor must separately appoint an alternate to attend each meeting that he or she is unable to attend. Metropolitan Transportation Authority/City Selection Committee The MTA is charged with conducting hearings and setting fares for established operating organizational units and the approval of transportation zones, final rail corridor selections, and approval of contracts for construction and transit equipment acquisition. The 14-member agency (which meets at 9:30 a.m. on the 4th Thursday of the month at the MTA, One Gateway Plaza, 3rd floor, L.A.) includes four city councilmembers. Each city within four sectors of the County (defined by the League of California Cities, L.A. County Division), may vote to nominate one or more candidates from that particular sector for consideration for appointment to the MTA by the L.A. County City Selection Committee (see above). This committee meets on an “on called” basis. South Bay Cities Council of Governments and Steering Committee The SBCCOG is a joint powers authority of 16 cities and L.A. County of that provides a forum for local government efforts to work collaboratively on programs and studies directed at improving the environment, preserving natural resources, advocating for regional efforts to expand transportation alternatives, and increasing awareness for effective policies for a sustainable community and economic development. Meetings are at 6 p.m. on the 4th Thursday of each month, at 20285 Western Avenue in Torrance. The Steering Committee serves as the executive committee of SBCCOG – its members are the officers and committee chairs, as well as the chairs of the working groups and a Page 3 of 3 representative from the South Bay City Managers’ group. Meetings take place on the 2nd Monday of each month at 12 noon, at the South Bay Environmental Services Center, 20285 S. Western Avenue, Suite 100, Torrance. South Bay Cities Sanitation District (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles) The Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles are a partnership of special districts formed to protect public health and the environment through innovated cost-effective wastewater/ solid waste management and to convert waste into resources such as recycled water/ materials and energy. The South Bay Sanitation District board meetings take place at 1:30 p.m. on the 3rd Wednesday of each month at Torrance City Hall. Southern California Associations of Government SCAG is a joint powers authority established to provide a network for members to identify and address common community problems – the region encompasses six counties and 191 cities, covering more than 38,000 square miles. The agency develops long-range regional transportation plans including sustainable community strategy and growth forecast components, transportation improvement programs, regional housing needs allocation, and a portion of the South Coast Air Quality management plans. A general assembly is convened at least once a year (usually in April or May). West Basin Water Association This Association is concerned the problems associated with the existing deficiency in the supply of groundwater in the West Basin – its purpose is to investigate problems, formulate and disseminate factual and educational data in order to provide the West Basin inhabitants with a dependable supply of water to meet present and future needs. Meetings take place at 11:30 a.m. on the first Tuesday of each month at the Carson Community Center. Sister City Association, Inc. In 1967 the City of Hermosa Beach formed a “sister city” relationship with the City of Loreto, Baja California, Mexico – Council action on 3/21/67 initiated contact with Loreto government officials to establish a Sister City Program. The City Council adopted Resolution N.S. 2744 on 11/7/67, which welcomed Loreto, noted the official visit to Loreto by the Hermosa Beach City Council and Sister City Committee, and stipulated that an elected City official be appointed as a representative to help carry out the Program, which now includes a student exchange and paramedic training. Meetings take place at 7 p.m. on the first Monday of the month in Room 9 of the Community Center. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 15-xxxx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE TO SERVE AS THE CITY’S REPRESENTATIVE ON THE SOUTH BAY CITIES COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SBCCOG) WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) desires to designate its representative to the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Councilmember ______________________ is hereby appointed to serve as delegate and Councilmember ______________________ is hereby appointed to serve as alternate on the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG). SECTION 2. That the City Manager is authorized to execute any documents which are necessary to effectuate these designations and which are consistent with this Resolution. SECTION 3. That a certified copy of this Resolution shall be provided to the South Bay Cities Council of Governments. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 24th day of September, 2015. ______________________________________________________________________________________________ PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0685 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 24, 2015 VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - UNEXPIRED TERM - PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION - SCHEDULE INTERVIEWS (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council schedule a meeting at 5:30 p.m. October 27, 2015, for the purpose of interviewing Public Works Commission applicants to fill the unexpired term ending October 31, 2018. Background: An unscheduled vacancy arose on the Public Works Commission in July for a term ending October 31, 2018. Pursuant to Council direction at its meeting of July 28, 2015, the City Clerk advertised the vacancy with newspaper publications (August 6 and 13) and the posting (August 3) of special vacancy notices, setting a filing deadline of September 14, 2015. Two applications (attached) were received: Kathy Dunbabin Robert Smith Although typically scheduled to precede the regular meeting at which the appointment is made, applicant interviews may be conducted on other dates, if necessary, to ensure that the appointee is able to participate at the soonest possible meeting (November 18, in this case). Conducting interviews before the October 13 regular meeting is not a viable option due to the already scheduled 5 p.m. closed session. The recommended 5:30 interviews on October 27 would precede the 6 p.m. study session, followed by the regular meeting, at which the appointment would be made. Attachments: 1.Applications Submitted by: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk Concur: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 9/17/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Violent Crimes Aug Jul Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change Murder 0 0 0 0.0%0 0 0 0.0%0 0 0 0.0% Sex Crimes 1 1 0 0.0%1 1 0 0.0%6 5 1 20.0% Robbery 4 1 3 300.0%4 0 4 N.C.9 8 1 12.5% Aggravated Assaults 6 4 2 50.0%6 2 4 200.0%20 15 5 33.3% Simple Assault 6 2 4 200.0%6 7 -1 -14.3%38 58 -20 -34.5% Total Violent Crimes 17 8 9 112.5%17 10 7 70.0%73 86 -13 -15.1% Property Crimes Aug Jul Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change Burglary 10 11 -1 -9.1%10 11 -1 -9.1%94 62 32 51.6% Theft 46 32 14 43.8%46 34 12 35.3%299 266 33 12.4% Auto Theft 3 6 -3 -50.0%3 1 2 200.0%25 22 3 13.6% Total Property Crimes 59 49 10 20.4%59 46 13 28.3%418 350 68 19.4% Total Part I Crimes 76 57 19 33.3%76 56 20 35.7%491 436 55 12.6% Arrests Aug Jul Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change DUI 6 5 1 20.0%6 31 -25 -80.6%63 130 -67 -51.5% Adult 70 76 -6 -7.9%70 104 -34 -32.7%479 616 -137 -22.2% Juvenile 0 0 0 0.0%0 1 -1 -100.0%3 4 -1 -25.0% Citations Aug Jul Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change Misdemeanor 53 65 -12 -18.5%53 112 -59 -52.7%556 775 -219 -28.3% Muni Code 45 108 -63 -58.3%45 109 -64 -58.7%467 565 -98 -17.3% Traffic 131 107 24 22.4%131 121 10 8.3%1178 1517 -339 -22.3% Parking 6203 5857 346 5.9%6203 6566 -363 -5.5%42563 50938 -8375 -16.4% Animal Control 1 0 1 N.C.1 1 0 0.0%5 12 -7 -58.3% Traffic Accident Reports Aug Jul Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change Fatal 0 1 -1 -100.0%0 0 0 0.0%1 0 1 N.C. Injury 8 6 2 33.3%8 2 6 300.0%44 31 13 41.9% Non-Injury 30 32 -2 -6.3%30 25 5 20.0%186 193 -7 -3.6% Calls For Service Aug Jul Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change Calls For Service 2730 2924 -194 -6.6%2730 2979 -249 -8.4%20152 20931 -779 -3.7% Parking 263 304 -41 -13.5%263 285 -22 -7.7%1930 2101 -171 -8.1% Animal Control 125 118 7 5.9%125 134 -9 -6.7%813 901 -88 -9.8% INCREASE N.C. Not Calculable. To calculate the percentage change you use Time 1 - Time 2/Time2= a number x100= Percentage change. You cannot divide any number by 0 and receive a valid number 2015 August YTD 2015 August YTD 2015 August YTD Hermosa Beach Police Department 2015 August YTD Monthly Part I Crime Statistics August 2015 2015 August YTD 2015 August YTD Respectfully Submitted to: City Manager Tom Bakaly Approved by: Chief Sharon Papa Prepared by: Jenette Osborne As in all statistical comparisons, caution should be exercised in interpreting percent changes. When smaller numbers are compared the result is a greater percentage change; in other words, a more dramatic result is achieved. *Due to change in reporting processes there may be a variation in previously reported statistics