Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/24/15Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:00 PM Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Council Chambers City Council Mayor Carolyn Petty Mayor Pro Tem Hany Fangary Councilmembers Justin Massey Jeff Duclos Regular Meeting Agenda (Canvass of Votes and Installation of Officers) Closed Session to follow Regular Meeting - Agenda Attached Executive Team Viki Copeland, Finance Director Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director Pete Bonano, Interim Fire Chief Vanessa Godinez, Human Resources Manager Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Sharon Papa, Police Chief City Clerk Elaine Doerfling City Treasurer Karen Nowicki City Attorney Mike Jenkins Tom Bakaly, City Manager November 24, 2015City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 7:00 P.M. - REGULAR MEETING AGENDA All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. City Council agenda packets are available for your review on the City's website located at www.hermosabch.org. Complete agenda packets are also available for public inspection in the Police Department, Hermosa Beach Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer or you can access the packet at our website, www.hermosabch.org, on your laptop, tablet or smartphone through the wireless signal available in the City Council chambers: Network ID: CHB-Guest Password: chbguest Written materials pertaining to matters listed on the agenda of a regular City Council meeting must be submitted by noon of the Tuesday, one week before the meeting in order to be included in the agenda packet (tentative future agendas can be found as Item 2c in every regular agenda packet). However, written materials received after that deadline will nonetheless be posted under the relevant agenda item on the City's website at the same time as they are distributed to the City Council by email and provided to the City Council and the public at the meeting. Written materials may be sent to the City Manager's office at anny@hermosabch.org. The City Manager's office makes every effort to add supplemental items to the online agenda up to the time of the meeting but in some cases, supplemental items submitted after 2:00 p.m. on the meeting date may not be added to the online agenda until the day after the meeting. Persons who wish to address an issue of general nature (not pertaining to matters listed on the agenda) to the City Council for the official record may submit written material to the Council in lieu of or in addition to speaking under the Public Participation section of the meeting. Such written correspondence must be delivered to the City Clerk's office (cityclerk@hermosabch.org) or the City Manager's office (anny@hermosabch.org) by noon of the Tuesday, one week before the regular Council meeting in order to be included in the agenda packet. Emails to the City Council may be sent to citycouncil@hermosabch.org To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices (ALD) will be available for check out at the meeting. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, you must call or submit your request in writing to the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0203 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Page 2 Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 November 24, 2015City Council Regular Meeting Agenda CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CANVASS OF VOTES AND INSTALLATION OF OFFICERS a)REPORT 15-0829 CERTIFIED RESULTS OF THE CANVASS OF VOTES FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 3, 2015 AND INSTALLATION OF ELECTED OFFICERS (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Recommendation:To adopt the resolution (to be made available prior to the meeting) declaring the results of the General Municipal Election of November 3, 2015, as certified by the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk after completing the official canvass of votes. CLOSED SESSION REPORT ANNOUNCEMENTS MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS a)15-0824 WALK WITH SALLY PRESENTATION PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda as a business item. 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction not on this agenda, on items on this agenda as to which public comment will not be taken (Miscellaneous Items and Reports – City Manager and Other Matters), or to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar. Public comments on the agenda items called Miscellaneous Reports and Other Matters will only be heard at this time. Comments on public hearing items are heard only during the public hearing. Members of the audience may also speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; and, 3) during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters. Comments from the Page 3 Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 November 24, 2015City Council Regular Meeting Agenda public are limited to three minutes per speaker. The City Council acknowledges receipt of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters raised in written communications. The Council may take action to schedule issues raised in oral and written communications for a future agenda. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 4, with public comment permitted at that time. a)REPORT 15-0834 APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Recommendation:It is recommended that the City Council approve the minutes for the following meetings: 1) Regular meeting of March 10, 2015 2) Regular meeting of March 24, 2015 3) Adjourned Regular meeting of March 26, 2015 4) Regular meeting of April 14, 2015 5) Adjourned Regular meeting of April 27, 2015 6) Regular meeting of April 28, 2015 031015 reg mtg 032415 reg mtg 032615 adj reg mtg 041415 reg mtg 042715 adj reg mtg 042815 reg mtg Attachments: b)REPORT 15-0819 CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommendation:To ratify the following check registers. 11-05-15 11-12-15 Attachments: c)REPORT 15-0823 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Recommendation:To receive and file the tentative future agenda items. Tentative Future Agenda.docAttachments: d)REPORT 15-0832 MEMORANDUM REGARDING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS CITY TREASURER’S AND CASH BALANCE REPORT OCTOBER 2015 (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Page 4 Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 November 24, 2015City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Recommendation:It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the memorandum regarding financial reports. e)REPORT 15-0828 CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Recommendation:To approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. f)REPORT 15-0821 MEMORANDUM REGARDING PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the memorandum regarding Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda Items. g)REPORT 15-0822 ACTION SHEET OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 17, 2015 Recommendation:To receive and file the action sheet of the Planning Commission meeting of November 17, 2015. 11-17-15 PC Action SheetAttachments: h)REPORT 15-0830 CONSENT TO USE MUNICIPAL PARKING STRUCTURE FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH MURAL PROJECT (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:Authorize the Hermosa Beach Murals Project to install a mural on the south and west sides of the Municipal Parking Structure. Email from Hermosa Beach Mural Project 11-5-15Attachments: i)REPORT 15-0816 PROJECT STATUS REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2015 (Public Works Director Andrew Brozyna) Recommendation:To receive and file the Project Status Report as of October 31, 2015. CIP Project Summary OCT 2015Attachments: 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. a)REPORT 15-0818 REVIEW OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW A 30,250+ SQUARE FOOT HOTEL WITH 30 ROOMS AND COMMON AREAS ON AN UNDEVELOPED 11,516+ SQUARE FOOT LOT AT 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE; (2) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON-SALE Page 5 Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 November 24, 2015City Council Regular Meeting Agenda GENERAL ALCOHOL (MINI-BARS) IN GUEST ROOMS; (3) PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW A VALET PROGRAM AND PARKING IN TANDEM ON-SITE, AND ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN. (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:To sustain the Planning Commission approval of the Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan, and Conditional Use Permit by adopting the attached resolution and adopting an environmental Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan. Proposed Resolution - final Attachment 2 - Planning Commission Staff Report from October 20, 2015 Attachment 3 - Legal Posting Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project Final TIS 2013-02-13 Project plans (all pages) 1429 Hermosa Ave Exterior Rendering 11-18-2015.pdf Attachments: 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a)REPORT 15-0831 ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES UPDATE: ENERGY LEADER PARTNERSHIP AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN (Continued from meeting of October 13, 2015) (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris) Recommendation:Approve Energy Efficiency Measures for inclusion in the city's Climate Action Plan as outlined. HB Energy Study Report_3-10-15.docx Hermosa Beach At A Glance_Q3 2015.docx EECAP GhG Inventory.pdf EECAP_20151117_HB Municipal Reduction Measures_Final v2.pdf EECAP_20150916_HB Community Reduction Measures_Final v2.pdf EECAP_20151124_Energy Reduction Measures Presentation_HB_Council.pptx Attachments: b)REPORT 15-0814 PLAN HERMOSA (GENERAL PLAN/LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM) UPDATE AND NEXT STEPS (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:Staff recommends that Council provide input on the proposed community engagement approach for PLAN Hermosa. Hermosa Outreach and Hearing Schedule.pdfAttachments: 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL Page 6 Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 November 24, 2015City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 8. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items. No discussion or debate of these requests shall be undertaken; the sole action is whether to schedule the item for consideration on a future agenda. No public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's strategic plan (attached) and work plan when considering new items. 2015 STRATEGIC PLAN 2015 Plan in Brief 2014-2015 Performance Report 2015-2020-2030 Strategic Plan 2015 Action Agenda Governance Guiding Principles and Protocols: Operating Guidelines Decision Making Tool Attachments: NONE ADJOURNMENT Page 7 Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 November 24, 2015City Council Regular Meeting Agenda CLOSED SESSION AGENDA (LOCATION: Meetings convene in the Council Chambers and move to the Second Floor Conference Room after Public Comment) CALL TO ORDER IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENT RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION IN SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 1.15-0827 MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on November 17, 2015. 2.15-0825 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Existing Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) Name of Case: Miller v. City of Hermosa Beach, et al. United States District Court, Case Number. 2:15 - CV - 8464 3.15-0826 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Anticipation of Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Council on the advice of its legal counsel, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the City Council. Number of Potential Cases: 1 (E&B Natural Resources Management) ADJOURNMENT OF CLOSED SESSION Page 8 Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 November 24, 2015City Council Regular Meeting Agenda FUTURE MEETINGS AND CITY HOLIDAYS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS: December 8, 2015 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Closed Session (Quarterly Litigation Update), and 7:00 PM - City Council Meeting December 22, 2015 - Tuesday - No Meeting BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS: December 1, 2015 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting December 7, 2015 - Monday - 7:00 PM - Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission January 4, 2016 - Monday - 7:00 PM - Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission January 19, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting January 20, 2016 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting February 2, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting February 16, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting March 7, 2016 - Monday - 7:00 PM - Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission March 15, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting March 16, 2016 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting April 5, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting April 19, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting May 2, 2016 - Monday - 7:00 PM - Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission May 17, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting May 18, 2016 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting June 7, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting June 21, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting July 5, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission July 19, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting July 20, 2016 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting August 2, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting August 16, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting September 6, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission September 20, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting September 21, 2016 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting October 4, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting October 18, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting November 7, 2016 - Monday - 7:00 PM - Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission November 15, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting November 16, 2016 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting December 6, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting December 17, 2016 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting CITY OFFICES CLOSED FRIDAY-SUNDAY AND ON THE FOLLOWING DAYS: November 26, 2015 - Thursday - Thanksgiving Day January 18, 2016 - Monday - Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday February 15, 2016 - Monday - President's Day May 30, 2016 - Monday - Memorial Day July 4, 2016 - Monday - Independence Day September 5, 2016 - Monday - Labor Day November 24, 2016 - Thursday - Thanksgiving Day Page 9 Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 November 24, 2015City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Page 10 Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0829 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 CERTIFIED RESULTS OF THE CANVASS OF VOTES FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 3, 2015 AND INSTALLATION OF ELECTED OFFICERS (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Recommended Action: To adopt the resolution (to be made available prior to the meeting) declaring the results of the General Municipal Election of November 3, 2015, as certified by the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk after completing the official canvass of votes. Summary: The certified statement of election results will be completed and forwarded to me by the County Elections Official on Monday, November 23. The County Board of Supervisors is scheduled to declare those results official at its meeting on Tuesday, November 24. I will prepare and present to the Council (as a supplemental item) my certification and a resolution reciting and declaring the election results for Council adoption at its meeting of November 24. The newly elected officers will be sworn in and seated after Council’s adoption of the resolution declaring the certified election results. Respectfully Submitted by: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk Noted: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City Council Meeting November 24, 2015 Mayor and Members of the City Council CANVASS OF VOTES FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 3, 2015 Recommendation: To adopt the attached resolution that presents the official canvass of votes certified by the Los Angeles County Election Department of the General Municipal Election of November 3, 2015. The results of the canvass show Justin Massey and Jeff Duclos elected as Members of the City Council, Elaine C. Doerfling elected as City Clerk, Karen S. Nowicki elected as City Treasurer, and Measure H (transient occupancy tax increase) as passed. Elaine Doerfling City Clerk Attachments: 1. Resolution declaring election results 2. Exhibit “A” (certification/statement of votes) 3. Ordinance 15-1358 (Measure H) Page 1 of 3 15-7009 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 RESOLUTION NO. 15-7009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2015, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of Hermosa Beach, California, on Tuesday, November 3, 2015, as required by law; and WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law; voting precincts were properly established; election officers were appointed; and in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California for the holding of elections in general law cities; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 15-6974 adopted June 23, 2015, the County Election Department canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to the City Council, the results are received, attached and made a part hereof as “Exhibit A.” NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That there were five (5) voting precincts established in the City for the purpose of holding said election. That the whole number of ballots cast in the precincts (except vote-by-mail and provisional voter ballots) was 1,773, and the whole number of vote-by-mail and provisional voter ballots cast in the City was 1,982, making a total of 3,756 ballots cast in the City. SECTION 2. That the names of the persons voted for at the election for Member of the City Council are as follows: Kenneth Hartley Trent Larson Jeff Duclos Justin Massey Peter C. Tucker Page 2 of 3 15-7009 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 That the name of the person voted for at the election for City Clerk is as follows: Elaine C. Doerfling That the name of the person voted for at the election for City Treasurer is as follows: Karen S. Nowicki That the measure voted upon at the election is as follows: Measure H. Shall an ordinance be adopted that would increase the Hermosa Beach transient occupancy tax (hotel bed tax) from 10 percent to 12 percent of room revenue? YES NO SECTION 3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the City to each of the persons above named for the respective offices for which the persons were candidates and for and against the measure were as listed in the Exhibit "A" attached. SECTION 4. That the City Council does declare and determine that: - Justin Massey was elected as Member of the City Council for the full term of four (4) years; - Jeff Duclos was elected as Member of the City Council for the full term of four (4) years; - Elaine C. Doerfling was elected as City Clerk for the full term of four (4) years; - Karen S. Nowicki was elected as City Treasurer for the full term of four (4) years; and - The majority of those casting votes on Measure H voted in favor of it, and the measure was carried and shall be deemed adopted and ratified. Page 3 of 3 15-7009 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall enter in the records of the City Council of the City a statement of the result of the election, showing: (a) the whole number of ballots cast in the City; (b) the names of the persons voted for; (c) for what office each person was voted for; (d) the number of votes given at each precinct to each person; and (e) the total number of votes given to each person. SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and present to each of the persons so elected a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and authenticated; that the City Clerk shall also administer to each person elected the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe to it and file it in the office of the City Clerk. Each and all of the persons so elected shall then be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected. SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015. ___________________________________________________________________ PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ __________________________________ City Clerk City Attorney Page 1 of 3 15-1358 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ORDINANCE NO. 15-1358 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, INCREASING THE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX (HOTEL BED TAX) FROM 10% TO 12% THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Title. (See above) SECTION 2. Findings and Declarations. The people of Hermosa Beach find and declare all of the following: (a) The City of Hermosa Beach has overdue facility and infrastructure improvement needs that require more than the City’s available or projected revenues. (b) Our City has not increased the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) rate (Hotel Bed Tax) since 1990, and in that time this rate has dropped below the average rate of taxation compared to neighboring municipalities. (c) The Hotel Bed Tax is a valuable source of revenue for our City’s General Fund. (d) The proposed increase of two (2) percent is estimated by City Staff to generate an estimated additional $440,000 in revenue per year from the currently permitted short-term occupancy operators (hotels, motels, and hostels). (e) The additional two (2) percent Tax on those who stay overnight in our City is commensurate with the average Tax of neighboring cities and those in Southern California, and is not an undue or unfair burden to visitors to Hermosa Beach as this Tax is an expected expense that we all are accustomed to paying when traveling anywhere, but especially to desirable, unique, and beautiful locales. (f) A Hotel Bed Tax is not a new burden on the hotel or other permitted short-term accommodation operators as City code currently requires them to collect a bed tax from their guests. (g) The proposed Tax increase does not put the hotel or other permitted short-term accommodation operators at a competitive disadvantage since twelve (12) percent is the average Page 2 of 3 15-1358 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Hotel Bed Tax by neighboring cities that do not provide the unique, wonderful ocean/beachfront access, small town atmosphere, and clean, sparkling waters to enjoy while they are visiting. (h) The overwhelming majority of those staying overnight in Hermosa Beach are tourists. Therefore, the majority of the Hotel Bed Tax will be paid by non-residents. (i) Our current occupancy rate of 81% is comprised mainly of pleasure and recreational travelers who do not decide where they are traveling based on the Hotel Bed Tax. SECTION 3. Purpose and Intent. The people of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby declare their purpose and intent in enacting this ordinance to be as follows: (a) To protect our City infrastructure by enhancing and increasing a stable, reliable, and adequate funding source for it. (b) To generate incremental Hotel Bed Tax revenue to the City by adjusting the Tax on hotel operators and other short-term accommodations that may be permitted in the future. SECTION 4. Section 3.32.020 of Title 5, Chapter 3.32.020 is amended as follows: “Operator” means the person who is the proprietor of the hotel, motel, hostel, or any other permitted short-term rental, whether in the capacity of owner, lessee, sublessee, mortgagee in possession, licensee, and includes companies that arrange for reservations online. Though the operator performs his functions through a managing agent of any type or character other than an employee, the managing agent shall also be determined an operator for the purposes of this chapter and shall have the same duties and liabilities as his principal. Compliance with the provisions of this chapter by either the principal or the managing agent shall, however, be considered to be compliance by both. SECTION 5. Section 3.32.030 of Title 5, Chapter 3.32.030 is amended as follows: For the occupancy of any hotel, motel, hostel, hospital, or permitted short term rental as defined, each transient is subject to and shall pay a tax in the amount of 12% of the rent of bill charged by the operator. Said tax constitutes a debt owed by the transient to the City which is extinguished only by payment to the operator of the hotel, hospital, or other permitted short term accommodation at the time the rent or bill is paid. If the rent or bill is paid in installments, a proportionate share of the tax shall be paid with each installment. The unpaid tax shall be due upon the transient’s ceasing to occupy space in the hotel, hospital, or other permitted short term Page 3 of 3 15-1358 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 accommodation. If for any reason the tax due is not paid to the operator, the tax administrator may require that such tax shall be paid directly to the tax administrator. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective upon approval by the electorate in the manner provided by law on January 1, 2016. SECTION 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this ordinance is for any reason upheld to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. SECTION 8. Amendment or Repeal. The provisions of this Act may be renumbered as to Group, but otherwise may not be amended or repealed by the City Council without a vote of the people. SECTION 9. Clarification. The modifications to Section 3.32.02 set forth in Paragraph 4 of this ordinance are declarative of existing law and merely clarifying the existing code. ORDINANCE NO. 15-1358 - PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE ELECTORATE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 3, 2015, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES - 3,026 NOES – 537 ________________________________________________________________________ PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: ______________________________________ City Clerk Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 15-0824 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 WALK WITH SALLY PRESENTATION Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0834 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council approve the minutes for the following meetings: 1)Regular meeting of March 10, 2015 2)Regular meeting of March 24, 2015 3)Adjourned Regular meeting of March 26, 2015 4)Regular meeting of April 14, 2015 5)Adjourned Regular meeting of April 27, 2015 6)Regular meeting of April 28, 2015 Attachments: Six sets of minutes, as listed above Submitted by: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk Noted: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Tuesday, March 10, 2015 7:00 PM Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Council Chambers City Council Mayor Peter Tucker Mayor Pro Tem Nanette Barragan Councilmembers Carolyn Petty Hany Fangary Michael DiVirgilio Meeting Minutes - Draft Study Session: Economic Development and Sociable City -6:00pm, Regular City Council Meeting - 7:00pm March 10, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft 6:00 P.M. – STUDY SESSION CALL TO ORDER 6:12 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Sheryl Main ROLL CALL Present: DiVirgilio, Fangary, Petty, Mayor Tucker Absent: Barragan (arrived 6:38 p.m.) ID#2015-0243a)ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT UPDATE (Economic Development Officer Shelli Margolin-Mayer) ED Plan.pdf Updates on the ED Plan.docx Community Dialog Opportunities and Possibilities .pdf Brochure trifold.pdf HB Starting A Business Packet.pdf Flow Chart 7-29-14.pdf SUPPLEMENTAL ED Slides (added 3-10-15 at 11am).pdf Attachments: Economic Development Officer Margolin-Mayer gave a PowerPoint presentation. Discussion included the following: Brochures now given to assist new businesses Free 2-hour parking during business hours Priorities of the Economic Development Plan Past year's achievements such as increased business licenses "Yes and" training Consideration of allowing weddings on the beach Public comment on this item was heard with that for item b) below. ID#2015-0244b)SOCIABLE CITY (Economic Development Officer Shelli Margolin-Mayer) Page 1Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/17/2015 March 10, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft RHI Report on Hermosa Beach - FINAL (2).pdf Sociable City Implementation Plan.docx SUPPLEMENTAL Sociable City Slides (added at 3-10-15 at 11am).pdf Attachments: Economic Development Officer Margolin-Mayer gave a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Council questions. City Manager Bakaly also responded to Council questions. Councilmember Fangary disclosed ex parte communications. Discussion included: Potential use of "greeters" who give directions and assist visitors to the City Better lighting in all City parking lots More LED string lighting on and between Pier Plaza trees Possibly allowing (highly regulated) street performers Performances by local schoolchildren Big band and jazz performances PUBLIC COMMENT Coming forward to address the Council on items a) and b) were: Julie Hamill Dave Fulton Sheryl Main David Lowe Action: To receive and file the updates for both a) and b). Motion Petty, second DiVirgilio. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. ADJOURNMENT OF STUDY SESSION – 7:07 p.m. 7:00 P.M. - REGULAR AGENDA CALL TO ORDER – 7:23 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Fred Hahn ROLL CALL: Present: Barragan, DiVirgilio, Fangary, Petty, Mayor Tucker Absent: None Page 2Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/17/2015 March 10, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft CLOSED SESSION REPORT – None ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilmember Fangary announced the Beach Cities Symposium on Underage Drinking tomorrow at 6:30 -8:30 p.m. in the Community Center's 2nd Story Theater. He disclosed recent meetings with OTO Development and Bolour Associates about their prospective hotels. Mayor pro tem Barragan thanked the community for the big Election Day turnout at the polls. Mayor Tucker said he threw out the first pitch last weekend at the Hermosa Beach Little League game and acknowledged staff for its upkeep of Clark Field. He also invited everyone to attend Hermosa’s annual St. Patrick’s Day Parade Saturday, March 14, starting at 11 a.m. City Clerk Doerfling gave a brief update on the March 3 election, saying she hopes to complete the canvas of returns in time to certify the results for presentation at the Council’s regular meeting of March 24. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS ID#2015-0222a)SPECIAL OLYMPICS HOST TOWN PRESENTATION Jody Leventhal, Hermosa Beach Host Town Chair, said Hermosa will host athletes from Belgium and Belize, noting that donations are still welcome, and showed a promotional video. ID#2015-0181b)RECOGNITION OF CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2014 BEACH CITIES TOY DRIVE ORGANIZERS Mayor Tucker presented to JR Reviczky a Certificate of Recognition for his work with the annual toy drive, thanking him for his dedication. Sam Edgerton, who was not in attendance, was also recognized for his work. Page 3Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/17/2015 March 10, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Isabella Bacallao Sophia Pizer and SaraJane Bacallao Barbara Ellman Sheryl Main Sal Longo Jose Bacallao Allan Mason Dennis Jarvis Mike Collins Craig Cadwallader, Surfrider Foundation South Bay Chapter Dave Fulton David Lowe, Hermosa Restaurant & Tavern Association Chris Prenter ID#2015-0258a)LETTER FROM FRED HUEBSCHER DATED MARCH 9, 2015 REGARDING AGENDA COVER AND RESPONSE FROM CITY Letter from Fred Huebscher regarding agenda cover and response from City (added 3-10-15 at 11am).pdf agenda cover 030915 (added 3-10-15 at 11am).pdf Attachments: Action: To receive and file the letter. Motion Barragan, second DiVirgilio. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the Consent Calendar. Motion DiVirgilio, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. ID#2015-0241a)MEMORANDUM REGARDING CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Action: To receive and file the memorandum. ID#2015-0234b)CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) 02-19-15 02-26-15 Attachments: Action: To ratify the check registers. age 4Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/17/2015 March 10, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft ID#2015-0239c)TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Tentative Future Agenda.docAttachments: Action: To receive and file the Tentative Future Agenda Items. ID#2015-0246d)CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Cash Balances Jan 15.pdf Treasurer Report Jan'15 .pdf Attachments: Action: To receive and file the January 2015 Reports. ID#2015-0235e)CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Action: To approve cancellation of certain checks, as recommended by the City Treasurer. ID#2015-0256f)ACTION MINUTES OF THE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 2015 010515_minutes-FINAL.pdfAttachments: Action: To approve the action minutes of the Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission meeting of January 5, 2015. SID#2015-0245ID#2015-0245g)ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 3, 2015 February 3 2015 Parks Recreation and Community Resources Minutes-Final.docx Attachments: Action: To approve the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of February 3, 2015. ID#2015-0236h)AWARD STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE CONTRACT (Associate Engineer Homayoun Behboodi) Draft PSA EXHIBIT A storm drain catch basin maint rfp 1-12-15_FINAL United Storm Water Inc Proposal Attachments: Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Award the attached Storm Drain Catch Basin Maintenance contract to United Storm Water for the period beginning April 1, 2015 and ending March 31, 2018 for a total three year contract amount of $71,062.50; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the Page 5Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/17/2015 March 10, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; and 3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within the budgeted amount. ID#2015-0233i)CIP 14-173 8TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS AWARD PRELIMINARY DESIGN CONTRACT (Project Manager Victor Chavez) ATT 1 - Draft PSA.pdf ATT 2 - Harris Proposal.pdf ATT 3 - Fee Schedule.pdf Attachments: Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Award Professional Services Agreement to Harris and Associates in the amount of $64,940 to provide conceptual designs and preliminary engineering; 2) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make changes as necessary within the approved budget; and 3) Authorize an additional appropriation of $4,434 to the Tyco Fund. ID#2015-0232j)CIP 11-537 SOUTH PARK PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS-PLAYGROUND REMODEL AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (Associate Engineer Mondher Saïed, P.E.) Green Giant Construction Contract.doc Resolution.doc SUPPLEMENTAL-South Park Site Analysis _Final Concept_4-1-14 (added 3/9/15 at 4pm) Attachments: Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Award the Construction Contract to Green Giant Landscape Inc. to provide construction services for CIP 11-537 South Park Phase I Improvements-Playground Remodel in the amount of $755,909; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the attached Construction Contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; 3) Adopt Resolution No. 15-6941, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CIP 11-537 SOUTH PARK PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS-PLAYGROUND REMODEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 830.6 AND ESTABLISHING A PROJECT PAYMENT ACCOUNT"; 4) Authorize an additional appropriation of $78,259 from the Capital Improvement Fund; and 5) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make changes to the contract within the project budget. Page 6Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/17/2015 March 10, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft ID#2015-0238k)CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE CITY’S PARTICIPATION IN EARTH HOUR ON MARCH 28, 2015 FROM 8:30 P.M. TO 9:30 P.M. AND PROMOTING EARTH DAY ON APRIL 22, 2015 (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris) Proposed Resolution.docAttachments: Action: To adopt Resolution No. 15-6942, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING PARTICIPATION IN EARTH HOUR ON MARCH 28, 2015 FROM 8:30 P.M. TO 9:30 P.M. INCLUDING TURNING OFF ALL NON-ESSENTIAL LIGHTING AND ELECTRIC DEVICES IN MUNICIPAL AND OTHER FACILITIES, AND URGING PARTICIPATION IN EARTH DAY ON APRIL 22, 2015." cID#2015-0237 ID#2015-0237l)APPROVAL OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE CHURCH’S EASTER SUNRISE MASS ADDITION TO THE SPECIAL EVENT CALENDAR FOR SUNDAY, APRIL 5, 2015 (Senior Recreation Supervisor Kelly Orta) Easter Sunrise Mass Special Event Application Approved 2015 Calendar of Events (Jan to July) Attachments: Action: To approve the addition to the Special Events Calendar. ID#2015-0242m)REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF DONATION TO MIRA COSTA HIGH SCHOOL GRAD NIGHT 2015 (City Manager Tom Bakaly) Mira Costa GRAD Nite Donation Request 2015.pdfAttachments: Action: To approve the requested $1,000 donation to the Mira Costa High School G.R.A.D. Booster Club. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES ID#2015-0257a)ORDINANCE NO. 15-1349 -“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 12.16, ADDING PROVISIONS TO ALLOW AND Page 7Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/17/2015 March 10, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft REGULATE RETAIL SALES/DISPLAY ENCROACHMENTS ON PIER PLAZA, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 17.26 FOR CONSISTENCY (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) 15-1349 Retail-Sales Display Encroachments-Pier PlazaAttachments: Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Dennis Jarvis Richard O'Reilly Action: To waive full reading and re-introduce Ordinance No. 15-1349, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE,CHAPTER 12.16, ADDING PROVISIONS TO ALLOW AND REGULATE RETAIL SALES/DISPLAY ENCROACHMENTS ON PIER PLAZA, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 17.26 FOR CONSISTENCY,"with paragraph 5.b. revised to include the vertical display (in a rack against the exterior wall) of six new surfboards not to exceed seven feet in height. Motion Barragan, second Tucker. The motion carried 3-2, noting the dissenting votes of DiVirgilio and Fangary. 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION –All items are from the February 24, 2015 meeting ID#2015-0218a)TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (Continued from meeting of February 24, 2015) Tentative Future Agenda.docAttachments: This item was pulled by Councilmember Fangary. Action: To receive and file the Tentative Future Agenda Items. Motion Fangary, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. ID#2015-0207b)ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 21, 2015 (Continued from meeting of February 24, 2015) action minutes 1-21-15Attachments: This item was pulled by Councilmember Fangary. Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of January 21, 2015. Motion Fangary, second DiVirgilio. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Page 8Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/17/2015 March 10, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft ID#2015-0211c)REMOVAL OF GRANITE CUBICAL BOLLARDS AND RELOCATION OF PLAQUES ON PIER PLAZA (Continued from meeting of February 24, 2015) (Associate Engineer Homayoun Behboodi) Attachment 1 PierPlazaLayout Attachment 2 Bollards, Disabled Markings, and Plaques Attachment 3 Areas for Relocation Attachments: This item was pulled by Councilmember Fangary. Public Works Director Brozyna presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve the removal of the granite cubical bollards from Pier Plaza; 2) Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the Lighthouse owner for the refurbishment and relocation of the jazz plaques; and 3) Authorize the relocation of the jazz plaques onto the Pier head as an alternative location. Motion Barragan, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. ID#2015-0252a)TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE DEFINITION AND STANDARDS FOR RESTAURANTS, BARS, PLACES WITH LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, AND ON-SALE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENTS INCLUDING THE FOOD TO ALCOHOL SALES RATIO AND RELATED AMENDMENTS FOR CONSISTENCY AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (Senior Planner Pamela Townsend) Proposed Ordinance PC Resolution 15-2 Attachments: Community Development Director Robertson presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Page 9Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/17/2015 March 10, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft City Attorney Jenkins and Police Chief Papa also responded to Council questions. Marcie Griffin, California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (CABC) Deputy Division Chief, Southern Division, and Vincent Cravens, CABC District Administrator/Captain, responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 9:16 p.m. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Seth Weiss Fred Hahn David Lowe The public hearing closed at 9:23 p.m. Action: To introduce (as amended this evening) and waive full reading of Ordinance No. 15-1350, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLE 17 (ZONING) RELATING TO THE DEFINITION, STANDARDS AND/OR ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS FOR RESTAURANTS AND ON-SALE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENTS INCLUDING THE FOOD TO ALCOHOL SALES RATIO,"amended this evening to define restaurant as a bona fide public eating establishment, allow those open after 11 p.m. to serve their choice of food items until an hour prior to the closing, and require restaurants to maintain a minimum of 50% of total gross sales. Motion Petty, second Tucker. The motion carried 3-2, noting the dissenting votes of Barragan and Fangary. The meeting recessed at 10:28 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:46 p.m. ID#2015-0251b)APPROVAL OF FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED IN AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN (Senior Planner Pamela Townsend) Community Development Director Robertson presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public Works Director Brozyna also responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 10:49 p.m. Coming forward to address the Council at this time was: Geoff Hirsch Page 10Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/17/2015 Proposed ResolutionAttachments: March 10, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft The public hearing closed at 10:55 p.m. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 15-6943, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016." Motion Petty, second DiVirgilio. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Action: To continue on with the meeting and adjourn at midnight. Motion DiVirgilio, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 11 p.m., the order of the agenda moved to Item 3(a). 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS ID#2015-0221a)CITY MANAGER BONUS (Continued from meeting of February 24, 2015) (City Attorney Mike Jenkins) SUPPLEMENTAL Resolution approving bonus (added 3-10-15 at 2:45pm).pdf Attachments: Councilmember Fangary left the meeting at 11:55 p.m. City Attorney Jenkins presented the executive summary/staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 15-6944 entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A BONUS FOR THE CITY MANAGER FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2014”approving the recommended 7% bonus. Motion Petty, second DiVirgilio. The motion carried 3-1, noting the dissenting vote of Barragan and the absence of Fangary. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER REPORT 15-0220 a)HERMOSA BEACH CITY / SCHOOL COMPACT MEETING (Continued from meeting of February 24, 2015) (City Manager Tom Bakaly) COMPACT_AfterSchoolProgram_2 11 15_FINAL.docxAttachments: This item was continued. Page 11Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/17/2015 March 10, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft REPORT 15-0226 b)CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEES (Continued from meeting of February 24, 2015) Appt List 4 Final 2015.docAttachments: This item was continued. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS -CITY COUNCIL ID#2015-0253a)VACANCIES -BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - UPCOMING EXPIRATION OF TERMS ON THE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ADVISORY COMMISSION (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Action: To direct the City Clerk to advertise for applicants to fill the expiring Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission terms. Motion Petty, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. ID#2015-0255b)VACANCIES -BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION UNEXPIRED TERM ENDING JUNE 20, 2017 (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Resignation Letter_LauzonAttachments: Action: To direct the City Clerk to advertise for applicants to fill the expiring Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission term. Motion Petty, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Additional Action: To extend the meeting until 12:15 a.m. Motion Petty, second Barragan. The motion carried 4-1, noting the dissenting vote of Fangary. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 12:07 a.m. Wednesday, June 11, 2015, to the City Council Retreat on Saturday, March 14, at 7:30 a.m. at the Beach House (1300 The Strand), which will adjourn to the Regular meeting of March 24, 2015, with a Closed Session at 6 p.m. to be followed by the Regular meeting at 7 p.m. in Council Chambers. Page 12Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/17/2015 Tuesday, March 24, 2015 6:00 PM Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Council Chambers City Council Mayor Peter Tucker Mayor Pro Tem Nanette Barragan Councilmembers Carolyn Petty Hany Fangary Michael DiVirgilio Meeting Minutes - Draft Closed Session -6:00 p.m., Regular City Council Meeting - 7:00 p.m. March 24, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft 6:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Barragan, DiVirgilio, Fangary, Petty, Mayor Tucker Absent: None PUBLIC COMMENT No one came forward to address the Council. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION IN SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 6:06 p.m. REPORT 15-0212 a)MINUTES: Approval of minutes of the following Closed Sessions: Closed Session of January 27, 2015; and, Closed Session of February 10, 2015 REPORT 15-0276 b)CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 552 11th Place (Hermosa Self-Storage) City Negotiator: City Manager/Finance Director Negotiating Party: Richard Thielscher, Thielscher-Randall Corporation Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment of lease extension between City (Lessor) and Thielscher-Randall (Lessee) REPORT 15-0275 c)PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Attorney Discussion of process for City Attorney performance evaluation ADJOURNMENT OF CLOSED SESSION 6:55 p.m. 7:00 P.M. - REGULAR AGENDA CALL TO ORDER 7:11 p.m. Page 1Hermosa Beach Printed on 10/21/2015 March 24, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Cliff Numark ROLL CALL Present: Barragan, DiVirgilio, Fangary, Petty, Mayor Tucker Absent: None CLOSED SESSION REPORT City Attorney Jenkins said no public comment was received prior to Closed Session; the two agendized items were discussed, with nothing added to the agenda; and no reportable action was taken. City Clerk Doerfling said additional time was needed to verify ballots/canvas returns from the March 3, 2015 Special Election, requiring certification of the election results (agenda item 6a) to be postponed from tonight’s meeting to an adjourned regular meeting at 5 p.m. Thursday, March 26, at which time a resolution declaring the results will be presented for Council adoption. ANNOUNCEMENTS Action: To allow Councilmember Fangary the opportunity this evening to address the item he missed at the last meeting (city manager bonus). Motion Tucker, second DiVirgilio. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Councilmember Fangary announced the General Plan Workshop to be held Saturday, March 28; and acknowledged both Hermosa and Redondo staff for quickly addressing a sinkhole problem at the intersection of Ninth Street and Ardmore Avenue. Mayor pro tem Barragan thanked all who supported her recent letter to the editor in the local paper; and welcomed contact from residents. Mayor Tucker announced the State of the City address to be held at the Beach House Hotel at 7 p.m. Thursday, March 26, with a 6 p.m. reception beforehand. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS REPORT 15-0286 a)BADGE PINNING CEREMONY FOR FIRE FIGHTER THOMAS SURBER Page 2Hermosa Beach Printed on 10/21/2015 March 24, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Fire Chief Lantzer introduced Thomas Surber, the City's new firefighter/ paramedic, calling him an exemplary employee, and pinned his badge onto his uniform. Mr. Surber said he was grateful for the opportunity to serve Hermosa and thanked his fellow firefighters for their guidance. REPORT 15-0287 b)RECOGNIZING MARCH AS RED CROSS MONTH Gila Katz was recognized for her volunteer work in the community by Julie Thomas, Red Cross Santa Monica Chapter Executive Director and Cliff Numark, Red Cross Vice President. Ms. Katz said it had been a great honor representing Hermosa as a Red Cross ambassador. Mayor Tucker then presented the certificate proclaiming March as “Red Cross Month.” REPORT 15-0288 c)RECOGNIZING DONATION OF $1,405 FROM KATHLEEN WHITEHEAD FOR VALLEY PARK PICNIC TABLE AND DEDICATION PLAQUE Mayor Tucker presented Kathleen Whitehead with the Certificate of Recognition for her donation toward the purchase of a picnic table with a dedication plaque for Valley Park. Ms. Whitehead then spoke of her fondness of Valley Park. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Jim Lissner Sheryl Main Gary Brown No name given Allan Mason REPORT 15-0283 a)LETTER FROM SONYA HODSON DATED MARCH 4, 2015 REGARDING HERMOSA BEACH VOLLEYBALL COURTS DISCUSSION Sonya Hodson Letter.docxAttachments: Page 3Hermosa Beach Printed on 10/21/2015 March 24, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Action: To receive and file the letter. Motion DiVirgilio, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0285 b)LETTER FROM JIM LISSNER DATED MARCH 17, 2015 REGARDING SHOWING THE UNASSIGNED BALANCE Jim Lissner Letter.docx City of Beverly Hills.pdf City of Park City.pdf Attachments: Action: To receive and file the letter. Motion DiVirgilio, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Further Action: To direct staff to return with discussion about showing the unassigned balance of the CAFR at the May 21, 2015 Budget Workshop. It was the consensus of the Council to approve this motion. At this time, Mayor Tucker invited Councilmember Fangary to address the item he missed at the last meeting (city manager bonus). Councilmember Fangary first disclosed ex parte communications with Bolour & Associates. He then discussed his thoughts on agenda clarity as it relates to the Brown Act, as well as his belief that public comment should be solicited for Closed Session items. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the Consent Calendar items with the exception of the following item which was removed for separate discussion: 2g Fangary. Motion DiVirgilio, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0282 a)MEMORANDUM REGARDING CITY COUNCIL MINUTES (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Action: To receive and file the memorandum regarding City Council minutes. REPORT 15-0263 b)CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) 03-05-15 2b(1) 03-11-15 2b(2) 03-12-15 2b(3) Attachments: Page 4Hermosa Beach Printed on 10/21/2015 March 24, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Action: To ratify check registers as presented. REPORT 15-0267 c)TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Tentative Future Agenda.docAttachments: Action: To receive and file the Tentative Future Agenda Items. REPORT 15-0277 d)REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS FOR FEBRUARY 2015 (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Action: To receive and file the February 2015 Financial Reports. REPORT 15-0279 e)ACTION SHEET OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 17, 2015 (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Pl. Comm. Action Sheet 3-17-15.docAttachments: Action: To receive and file the action sheet of the Planning Commission meeting of March 17, 2015. REPORT 15-0273 f)SUBJECT: FINAL MAP NO. 72210 (C.U.P. CON NO. 13-6, PDP NO. 13-7) LOCATION: 1500 HERMOSA AVENUE APPLICANT(S): 1500 HERMOSA AVENUE LLC REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR A 2-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT (Senior Planner Pamela Townsend) 1500 Hermosa reso.docxAttachments: Action: To approve Resolution No. 15-6945, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 72210, FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF A two-UNIT CONDOMINIUM, LOCATED AT 1500 Hermosa Avenue IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Page 5Hermosa Beach Printed on 10/21/2015 March 24, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft REPORT 15-0261 g)CIP PROJECT NO. 14-402 SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (Assistant Engineer Victor H. Chavez) 14-402 Attachment 1 - Construction Contract 14-402 Attachment 2 - Resolution Attachments: This item had been removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Fangary for separate discussion. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Award the Construction Contract for CIP Project No. 14-402 Sewer Improvements at Various Locations to Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp. of the City of Torrance of California in the amount of $464,488; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest subject to approval by the City Attorney; 3) Adopt Resolution No. 15-6947,entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING THE DESIGN AND PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CIP No. 14-402 SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - VARIOUS LOCATIONS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 830.6 AND ESTABLISHING A PROJECT PAYMENT ACCOUNT”; 4) Authorize an additional appropriation of $88,889 from the Sewer Fund; and 5) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make changes as necessary within the project budget Motion Barragan, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0264 h)PROJECT STATUS REPORT AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 2015 (Director of Public Works/City Engineer, Andrew Brozyna, P.E.) CIP Project Summary FEB 2015_3-17-15Attachments: Action: To receive and file the Project Status Report. REPORT 15-0265 i)APPROPRIATION OF MEASURE R FUNDS RECEIVED FROM SOUTH BAY CITIES COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SBCCOG) TO CIP-12-143, PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (PCH)/AVIATION MOBILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (Public Works Director/City Engineer Andrew Brozyna) Action: To approve the appropriation of Measure R funds in the amount of $190,000 to be received from the SBCCOG to CIP-12-143, Pacific Coast Highway (PCH)/Aviation Mobility Improvement Project, and corresponding revenue to the Measure R Fund. Page 6Hermosa Beach Printed on 10/21/2015 March 24, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft REPORT 15-0266 j)APPROVAL OF ONE MONTH LEASE EXTENSION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 552 11TH PLACE (HERMOSA SELF STORAGE) (Finance Director Viki Copeland) 4th Self Storage Lease Amendment, CA ApprovedAttachments: Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve the extension of the lease term for 30 days to April 30, 2015; and 2) Direct the City Manager to execute the attached extension of the lease. REPORT 15-0259 k)ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Action: To accept the donation from Kathleen Whitehead toward one picnic table for Valley Park with dedication plaque. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES ORD 15-0262 a)ORDINANCE NO. 15-1350 -“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLE 17 (ZONING), RELATING TO THE DEFINITION, STANDARDS AND/OR ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS FOR RESTAURANTS AND ON-SALE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENTS INCLUDING THE FOOD TO ALCOHOL SALES RATIO” (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) 15-1350 Restaurants-Alc.Bev.Estab. SUPPLEMENTAL Raymond Dussault (added 3-24-15 at 4pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Kerri Krusinski (added 3-24-15 at 4pm).pdf Attachments: Action: To waive full reading and adopt by title Ordinance No. 15-1350, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLE 17 (ZONING), RELATING TO THE DEFINITION, STANDARDS AND/OR ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS FOR RESTAURANTS AND ON-SALE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENTS INCLUDING THE FOOD TO ALCOHOL SALES RATIO.” Motion Petty, second DiVirgilio. The motion carried 3-2, noting the dissenting votes of Barragan and Fangary. 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Item 2(g) was heard at this time but is shown in order for clarity. Page 7Hermosa Beach Printed on 10/21/2015 March 24, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Item 2( 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. REPORT 15-0272 a)CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 15-1349 AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 12.16, ADDING PROVISIONS TO ALLOW AND REGULATE RETAIL SALES/DISPLAY ENCROACHMENTS ON PIER PLAZA (AS AMENDED TO ALLOW OUTDOOR DISPLAY OF SURFBOARDS), AND AMENDING CHAPTER 17.26 FOR CONSISTENCY AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (Senior Planner Pamela Townsend) Proposed Ordinance 15-1349 Legal Posting SUPPLEMENTAL H. Longacre (added 3-23-15 at 12pm).pdf Attachments: Community Development Director Robertson presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:12 p.m. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Dennis Jarvis George Barks Raymond Dussault Chris Pike Barbara Ellman Sheryl Main Chris Prenter The public hearing closed at 8:19 p.m. Action: To waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 15-1349, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 12.16, ADDING PROVISIONS TO ALLOW AND REGULATE RETAIL SALES/DISPLAY ENCROACHMENTS ON PIER PLAZA, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 17.26 FOR CONSISTENCY." Motion Petty, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Page 8Hermosa Beach Printed on 10/21/2015 March 24, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft REPORT 15-0274 b)GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT FROM COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR (CC) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MD) AND GENERAL PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT AT 1906 - 1918 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND DETERMINE THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (Senior Planner Pamela Townsend) Proposed Resolution PC Reso 15-4 (1906-1918 PCH) GPA- Legal Posting Attachments: Community Development Director Robertson presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:26 p.m. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Doug Leach, architect on behalf of the property owners The public hearing closed at 8:27 p.m. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 15-6946, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT FROM COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR (CC) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MD) AND GENERAL PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT FOR CONSISTENCY AT 1906 TO 1918 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS SW 10’ OF LOT 61 AND ALL OF LOTS 62, 63 AND 64, TRACT NO. 2548 AND LOT 1, TRACT NO. 8476, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT." Motion Petty, second DiVirgilio. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS REPORT 15-0271 a)CERTIFIED RESULTS OF THE CANVASS OF VOTES FOR THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF MARCH 3, 2015 (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) Page 9Hermosa Beach Printed on 10/21/2015 March 24, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft SUPPLEMENTAL City Clerk Memo (added 3-23-15 at 5pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Memo and Resolution No. 15-6948 (added 3-26-15 at 7pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Exhibit A - Certificate of Canvass (added 3-26-15 at 7pm).pdf Attachments: This item was continued, as requested by the City Clerk. REPORT 15-0268 b)REVIEW OF FINANCING ALTERNATIVES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH E&B NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CORPORATION IN LIGHT OF THE DEFEAT OF MEASURE O (Finance Director Viki Copeland) SUPPLEMENTAL Slides from Kosmont (added 3-23-15 at 12pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL H. Longacre (added 3-23-15 at 5pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Stacey Armato (added 3-24-15 at 11am).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Fiscal Health Slides (added 3-24-15 at 4pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Discretionary Funds (added 3-24-15 at 4pm).pdf Attachments: Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. Larry Kosmont, Kosmont Companies President/CEO, gave a PowerPoint presentation entitled "Preliminary Financing Scenarios Review," acknowledged members of his team in attendance, responded to Council questions, and introduced the next two speakers. Danny Kim, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP Partner, discussed the possibility of tax exempt status for payment of the settlement. Dan Dan Massiello, Kosmont Companies Senior Vice President - Public Finance, spoke of additional available financing options. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Ira Liflin Dency Nelson Andrea Valcourt Jim Sullivan Sheryl Main Gary Brown Action: To direct staff to focus on the following: Readying a $6 million down payment; A lease revenue bond option of between 15-20 years; A tax-deferred option (but move forward with the taxable option); Creation of a Joint Powers Authority with a focus on fixed but look at variable; and Page 10Hermosa Beach Printed on 10/21/2015 March 24, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft An informal selection process for a financial advisor and bond counsel. Motion DiVirgilio, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Action: To continue on with the meeting until 12:30 a.m., then re-evaluate if necessary. Motion Petty, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. At 10:42 p.m. the meeting recessed. At 10:56 p.m. the meeting reconvened. REPORT 15-0280 Attachments: c)PILOT PARKING PROGRAM UPDATE AND RECOMMENDATION FOR PURCHASE OF ELECTRONIC SINGLE-SPACE PARKING METERS (Management Analyst Nico De Anda-Scaia) 1 Official Citywide Silver Meter Map 1 Official North Yellow-Silv Meter Map 1 Official South Yellow-Silv Meter Map 2 RFP - City of San Rafael 3 IPS RFP RESP - City of San Rafael 4 Meters put to Work SUPPLEMENTAL David Lowe (added 3-24-15 at 11am).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Formal Agreement (added 3-24-15 at 11am).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Certificate of Liability (added 3-24-15 at 11am).pdf Management Analyst Nico de Anda-Scaia presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Bakaly also responded to Council questions. David Lowe, Chamber of Commerce Parking Subcommitee member, was invited forward to speak and to respond to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Mike Chiodo, IPS Group Director of Sales-Western Region David Lowe George Barks Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1)Receive and file the results from the Pilot Parking Program submitted by staff; 2)Authorize the additional appropriation of funds needed to purchase and install 471 single space electronic parking meters for commercial areas throughout the City in the amount of $217,029 from the Equipment Replacement Fund; and 3)Approve a contract with IPS Group, Inc. for the purchase and installation of 471 single space electronic parking meters including back-up battery components, and for ongoing wireless connectivity fees, and authorize the City Manager to execute the appropriate documents; with additional direction given to have staff return with a marketing plan for Council review at a future date; and to grant staff the authority to increase the hourly parking rate by 25 cents at night. Motion Petty, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Page 11Hermosa Beach Printed on 10/21/2015 March 24, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft REPORT 15-0284 d)2015 CITY COMMUNICATIONS PLAN (City Manager Tom Bakaly) HermosaBeach_CommunicationsPlan_2015_FINAL.docx 2015_Hermosa Beach_PRMatrix_FINAL.pdf Attachments: Action: To receive and file the report. Motion DiVirgilio, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER REPORT 15-0220 a)HERMOSA BEACH CITY / SCHOOL COMPACT MEETING (Continued from meeting of February 24, 2015) (City Manager Tom Bakaly) COMPACT_AfterSchoolProgram_2 11 15_FINAL.docxAttachments: Action: To receive and file the report. Motion DiVirgilio, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0226 b)CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEES (Continued from meeting of February 24, 2015) Appt List 4 Final 2015.docAttachments: Action: To receive and file the appointments list. Motion DiVirgilio, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS -CITY COUNCIL None 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL REPORT 15-0289 a)REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY TO EVALUATE AND UPDATE, IF NECESSARY, CITY COUNCIL PROCEDURES AND PROTOCOLS REGARDING DESCRIPTIONS OF AGENDA ITEMS AND LOCATION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS, CONSISTENT WITH Page 12Hermosa Beach Printed on 10/21/2015 March 24, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft THE REQUIREMENTS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2. Councilmember Fangary spoke to his request, garnering support from Mayor pro tem Barragan. REPORT 15-0290 b)REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION TO FIX THE CITY MANAGER’S SALARY CONSISTENT WITH HIS CURRENT SALARY, PURSUANT TO HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.12.050. City Attorney Jenkins responded to Council questions. Councilmember Fangary spoke to his request, garnering support from Mayor pro tem Barragan. c) REQUEST FROM MAYOR PRO TEM BARRAGAN TO CONSIDER PUTTING A MEASURE ON THE BALLOT TO INCREASE THE CITY’S TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX (TOT). Mayor pro tem Barragan spoke to her request, garnering support from Councilmember Fangary and Mayor Tucker. ADJOURNMENT The Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned at 12:30 a.m., Wednesday, March 25, 2015, to an Adjourned Regular meeting (for the purpose of certifying the election results) at 5 p.m. on Thursday, March 26, in Council Chambers, which will then adjourn to the Regular meeting of Tuesday, April 14, 2015, with a Closed Session at 6 p.m. to be followed by the Regular meeting at 7 p.m. in Council Chambers. Page 13Hermosa Beach Printed on 10/21/2015 Thursday, March 26, 2015 5:00 PM Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Council Chambers City Council Mayor Peter Tucker Mayor Pro Tem Nanette Barragan Councilmembers Carolyn Petty Hany Fangary Michael DiVirgilio Meeting Minutes - Draft Adjourned Regular Meeting - 5:00pm March 26, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft CALL TO ORDER –5:15 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE –John Wayne Miller ROLL CALL Present: DiVirgilio, Petty, Mayor Tucker Absent: Barragan, Fangary PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Coming forward to address the Council at this time was: Barbara Guild REPORT 15-0271 1.CERTIFIED RESULTS OF THE CANVASS OF VOTES FOR THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF MARCH 3, 2015 (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) SUPPLEMENTAL City Clerk Memo (added 3-23-15 at 5pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Memo and Resolution No. 15-6948 (added 3-26-15 at 7pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Exhibit A - Certificate of Canvass (added 3-26-15 at 7pm).pdf Attachments City Clerk Doerfling presented the certified results of the canvass, citing the exceptionally high voter turnout (about 54% of registered voters), with the vast majority voting against Measure O. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 15-6948 entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD TUESDAY, MARCH 3, 2015, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW,”as recommended by the City Clerk. Motion DiVirgilio, second Petty. The motion carried 3-0, noting the absence of Barragan and Fangary. Mayor Tucker invited everyone to this evening’s State of the City address at the Beach House Hotel at 7 p.m., with a 6 p.m. reception beforehand. ADJOURNMENT –The Adjourned Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned at 5:21 p.m. Thursday, March 26, 2015, to the Regular meeting of Tuesday, April 14, 2015, with a Closed Session at 6 p.m., followed by the Regular meeting at 7 p.m. in Council Chambers. Page 1Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 Tuesday, April 14, 2015 6:00 PM Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Council Chambers City Council Mayor Peter Tucker Mayor Pro Tem Nanette Barragan Councilmembers Carolyn Petty Hany Fangary Michael DiVirgilio Meeting Minutes - Draft Closed Session -6pm, Regular City Council Meeting - 7pm April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft 6:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6:06 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Barragan, DiVirgilio, Fangary, Petty, Mayor Tucker Absent: None PUBLIC COMMENT No one addressed the Council at this time. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION IN SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 6:07 p.m. REPORT 15-0315 1.MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on March 24, 2015. REPORT 15-0324 2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Initiation of Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) Number of Potential Cases: 1 REPORT 15-0314 3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Quarterly Litigation Update The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) a) Name of Case: Bertucci v. City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number: BC543237 b) Name of Case: Green v. City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number: BC571125 c) Name of Case: Khanlian v. City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles Central Court, Case Number: BC570706 d) Name of Case: Merrill v. City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number: BC532065 e) Name of Case: Roberts et al v. City of Hermosa Beach Page 1Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number: BC544495 f) Name of Case: Yrigoyen v. City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles Central Court, Case Number: BC561167 ADJOURNMENT OF CLOSED SESSION 7:00 p.m. 7:00 P.M. - REGULAR AGENDA CALL TO ORDER 7:10 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chuck Sheldon ROLL CALL Present: Barragan, DiVirgilio, Fangary, Petty, Mayor Tucker Absent: None CLOSED SESSION REPORT City Attorney Jenkins said there was no public comment received before Closed Session, no items were added, and there were no reportable actions taken. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Tucker read from a letter from the Secretary of the Air Force that the Los Angeles Air Force Base will not be closing because of an effective local letter-writing campaign and called the Base a valuable asset to both the community and the nation. He then said he was excited that improvements to the Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation Boulevard intersection would soon be underway. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS REPORT 15-0309 a)PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL AS “NATIONAL ALCOHOL AWARENESS AND PREVENTION MONTH” Mayor Tucker presented the proclamation to Raunda Frank and Holly Maynes of Behavioral Health Services. Page 2Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft David Lowe and another representative of “South Bay Communities Creating Change” declared April 2015 as National Alcohol Awareness and Prevention Month. REPORT 15-0310 b)PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 12 -18, 2015 AS “NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK” Mayor Tucker presented the proclamation to Kelly Conn, Community Library Manager, who thanked the community and the City for their support. REPORT 15-0311 c)PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 24, 2015 AS “A DAY OF REMEMBRANCE OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE OF 1915-1923” Mayor Tucker invited all of Armenian heritage in attendance to come forward and presented the proclamation. Sako Baghoyan thanked the City for the recognition, and it was noted that many who came forward were descendents of survivors of the genocide. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Kimberlee MacMullan, Chamber of Commerce President/CEO Jose Bacallao Mike Owen Larry Nakamura Barbara Ellman Marie Rice Sal Longo Dave Fulton Sheryl Main Chris Prenter Betsy Ryan Miguel Cruz, Sandy Saemann Phil Friedl City Manager Bakaly and City Attorney Jenkins responded to Council questions. Page 3Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Councilmember Fangary disclosed ex parte communications. Police Chief Papa and Captain Milton McKinnon were called forward to respond to Council questions. REPORT 15-0313 a)LETTERS REGARDING VOLLEYBALL COURTS Michael Soenen Letter and attachments.pdf Chris Brown Letter.pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Suni Keeling Letter (added 4-14-15 at 10am).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Kevin Bannerman Letter (added 4-14-15 at 10am).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Dan Wright Letter (added 4-14-15 at 2pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Ted Blaisdell Letter (added 4-14-15 at 2pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Monica Owen Letter (added 4-14-15 at 2pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Tayna Domasco Letter (added 4-14-15 at 2pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Rashel Mereness Letter (added 4-14-15 at 2pm).pdf Attachments: Action: To receive and file the letters. Motion DiVirgilio, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of the following items that were removed for separate discussion later in the meeting, but are shown in order for clarity: 2(c), Fangary; 2(f) and 2(j), DiVirgilio; 2(m), Petty. Motion DiVirgilio, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0318 a)CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) 05-22-14 05-27-14 Attachments: Action: To receive and file the memorandum. REPORT 15-0304 b)CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Page 4Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft 03-19-15 03-23-15 03-26-15 03-30-15 04-02-15 Attachments: Action: To ratify the check registers as presented. REPORT 15-0307 c)TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Tentative Future Agenda.docAttachments: This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Fangary for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Manager Bakaly and City Attorney Jenkins responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file the Tentative Future Agenda Items. Motion Fangary, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0294 d)CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Treasurer Report Feb'15 .pdf Cash Balances Feb 15.pdf Attachments: Action: To receive and file the March 2015 Financial Reports. REPORT 15-0295 e)CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Action: To approve the cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. REPORT 15-0303 f)ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 4, 2015 03-04-15 SUPPLEMENTAL Letters and Attachments from Chris Brown and Dave Fulton (added 4-13-15 at 7pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Jim O'Neil Letter (added 4-14-15 at 2pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Harry Cartwright Letter (added 4-14-15 at 2pm).pdf Attachments: Page 5Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft This item was pulled by Councilmember DiVirgilio at the request of Dave Fulton. City Manager Bakaly responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Counil on this item were: Dave Fulton Chris Brown Name indistinct Sandy Saemann Action: To receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of March 4, 2015. Motion DiVirgilio, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0299 g)SUBJECT: FINAL MAP NO. 72189 (C.U.P. CON NO. 13-15, PDP NO. 13-16) LOCATION: 504 25TH STREET APPLICANT(S): HB VALLEY LLC REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR A 2-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT (Senior Planner Pamela Townsend) 504 25th Street Resolution.docxAttachments: Action: To adopt Resolution No. 15-6949, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 72189, FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF A TWO-UNIT CONDOMINIUM, LOCATED AT 504 25TH STREET IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." REPORT 15-0300 h)SUBJECT: FINAL MAP NO. 72574 (C.U.P. CON NO. 13-16, PDP NO. 13-18) LOCATION: 512 25TH STREET Page 6Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft APPLICANT(S): HB VALLEY LLC REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR A 2-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT (Senior Planner Pamela Townsend) 512 25th Street Resolution.docxAttachments: Action: To adopt Resolution No. 15-6950, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 72574, FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF A TWO-UNIT CONDOMINIUM, LOCATED AT 512 25TH STREET IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." REPORT 15-0296 i)RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO INCREASE THE VALUE OF THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PENCO ENGINEERING INC. FOR ADDITIONAL SEWER FEE SERVICES (Public Works Director Andrew Brozyna) PENCO Proposal_Scope of Services_Attachment 1 4-15-15 amendment to penco agr 4-14-15 Attachments: Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve First Amendment to PENCO to increase the value of the Professional Services Agreement for additional services per the revised Scope of Services, enclosed as Attachment No. 1; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the attached First Amendment subject to approval by the City Attorney; and 3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make changes to the agreement within the project budget. REPORT 15-0298 j)CIP 14-163 PROTECTIVE BOLLARDS/DELINEATORS ALONG THE STRAND APPROVE INSTALLATION (Project Manager Mondher Saïed) Page 7Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Attachment 1 - Notice to Residents-March 2015.doc Attachment 2 - Radius Map Strand Traffic Delineators - March 2015.pdf Attachment 3 - Location of Bollards Along The Strand.pdf Attachment 4 - Do Not enter Sign.doc Attachment 5- Colors of Reflective Bands .pdf Attachment 6 - Correspondence from Sandy Saemann.pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Information from Public Works Director Andrew Brozyna (added 4-14-15 at 2pm).pdf Attachments: This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember DiVirgilio for separate discussion later in the meeting. This item was subsequently continued, but public comment was taken this evening. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Sandy Saemann Action: To continue the following items: 2(j), 9(a), 9(b) and 9c . Motion Tucker, second Fangary. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Additional Action: To continue item 2(m). Motion Petty, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0306 k)APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT DURING FY 2015-2016 (Associate Engineer Homayoun Behboodi) prepare engr report 4 landscape & St light dist 2015-16, 4-14-15Attachments: Action: To adopt Resolution No. 15-6971, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4 OF CHAPTER 1 OF THE “LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972,” BEING DIVISION 15, PART 2 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND SERVICING OF STREET AND SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND APPURTENANT WORK IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2015 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2016.” Page 8Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft REPORT 15-0297 l)RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE FIRST AMENDMENT TO INCREASE THE VALUE OF THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC, FOR EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION, MONITORING SERVICES, AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR A DURESS ALARM SYSTEM AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS (Police Captain Milton McKinnon) Amendment to Stanley Security Agreement 4-2-15 Panic-Duress Alarm Installation Monitoring Proposal_Attach 2 4-14-15 Attachments: Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve First Amendment to the Contract Agreement with Stanley Convergent Security Solutions, Inc. (Stanley Security) to increase the value of the Contract Agreement to include equipment installation, monitoring services, and maintenance services of a duress alarm system at various locations; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the attached First Amendment subject to approval by the City Attorney; and 3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make changes to the agreement within the project budget. REPORT 15-0317 m)AMEND THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BRENDLE GROUP BY ADDING $13,120 TO DEVELOP A TOOL FOR MUNICIPAL CARBON NEUTRALITY PLANNING AND TRACKING (Continued from Meeting of April 14, 2015) (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris) Hermosa Beach Phase 2 Proposal - 041415docx.pdf Brendle-Amendment.pdf Attachments: This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Petty for separate discussion later in the meeting, but was subsequently continued. REPORT 15-0327n)APPROVAL OF LEASE EXTENSION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 552 11TH PLACE (HERMOSA SELF STORAGE) (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Thielscher Email dated 3-11-15 5th Self Storage Lease Amendment Attachments: Action: To approve the lease extension, as recommended by staff. Page 9Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 2(c) and (f) were heard at this time; items 2(j) and (m) were subsequently continued; all are shown in order for clarity. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. REPORT 15-0322 a)CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AMENDING THE OUTDOOR DINING DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR PIER PLAZA (INCLUDING LORETO PLAZA) PER MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 12.16 (ENCROACHMENTS) AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (Senior Planner Pamela Townsend) CC - Proposed Resolution Outdoor Dining on Pier Plaza PC Resolution 15-6 (3-17-2015) Outdoor Dining Design and Operational Standards 2005 Amended 2012 SUPPLEMENTAL Exhibit Showing Proposed Location of Queuing Area and Pier Plaza Maps (added 4-13-15 at 7pm).pdf Attachments Attachments: Community Development Director Robertson presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Police Chief Papa and Fire Chief Lantzer responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 9:03 p.m. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: David Lowe Sandy Saemann The public hearing closed at 9:11 p.m. Ron Newman was invited forward to address the Council and respond to questions. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 15-6955, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 05-6417, “ADOPTING STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR THE DESIGN AND OPERATION OF OUTDOOR DINING AREAS ON PIER PLAZA”, OUTDOOR DINING DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR PIER PLAZA, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION 12-6802, AND DETERMINING THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT Page 10Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT," with the following revisions: 1) Remove the requirement for barriers for non-alcohol establishments; 2) Forbid queueing before 10 p.m. unless authorized by the Police Department (due to demand or special events), limiting the line space to 15 feet past the five-foot encroachment area; and 3) Require removal of the heaters and podiums from the five-foot encroachment area. Motion Fangary, second Petty. The motion carried 3-2, noting the dissenting votes of Barragan and Tucker. At 9:57 p.m. the meeting recessed. At 10:14 p.m. the meeting reconvened. It was Council consensus to move the order of the agenda to item 7(c) at this time. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS REPORT 15-0305 a)OIL FINANCING UPDATE (City Manager Tom Bakaly) City Manager Bakaly presented the update and responded to Council questions. Finance Director Copeland and Public Works Director Brozyna also responded to Council questions. No one came forward to address the Council on this item. Action: To receive and file the update. Motion DiVirgilio, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0319 b)SEWER FEE ANALYSIS (Public Works Director Andrew Brozyna) Sewer Study Presentation 4-14-15Attachments: Public Works Director Brozyna presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Bakaly also responded to Council questions. No one came forward to address the Council on this item. Page 11Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Jeff Cooper, PENCO Engineering Vice President, gave a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: To approve option 3 in the presentation, with changes/direction made at tonight’s meeting. Motion Petty, second Fangary. The motion was subsequently withdrawn. Action: To approve option 1 in the presentation, with changes/direction made at tonight’s meeting. Motion Petty, second Barragan. The motion carried 4-1, noting the dissenting vote of Fangary. REPORT 15-0321 c)STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT UPDATE (Continued from meeting of April 14, 2015) (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) SUPPLEMENTAL Letter from Bolour Associates dated April 13th (added 4-13-15 at 7pm).pdf Attachments: This item was continued at the request of the developer. REPORT 15-0323 d)PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY/AVIATION MOBILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUNDING FOR PROJECT ASSESSMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (PA/ED) (Public Works Director Andrew Brozyna) Bacharach-SBCOG-PAED 040715 Request Steve Lantz 040715 Attachments: City Manager Bakaly presented an update but asked that the item be continued. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Julian Katz Action: To continue the item, returning at a later date with more detail including a statement of work and milestones met. Motion Barragan, second DiVirgilio. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER REPORT 15-0292 a)HOMELESS UPDATE (Economic Development Officer Shelli Margolin-Mayer and Captain Milton McKinnon) Page 12Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Parking Meter.jpg SBCCOG Proposal (Ver 1 2).pdf Attachments: Action: To continue tonight's meeting past 10:30 p.m. to as late as 12:30 a.m. Motion DiVirgilio, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Manager Bakaly presented the update and responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file the update. Motion Barragan, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0316 b)UPDATE ON BICYCLE PARKING (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris) Bike Rack Styles for Mini-Corrals.docx Cost Estimate for Bike Racks.docx Attachments: City Manager Bakaly presented the update and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Julian Katz Action: To receive and file the update. Motion DiVirgilio, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0329 c)HERMOSA CENTENNIAL HANDPRINT WALL REQUEST TO APPROVE REVITALIZATION AND SECOND “MOBILE” HANDPRINT WALL TO SERVE AS FUNDRAISER FOR SPECIAL OLYMPICS HOST TOWN ACTIVITIES (Project Manager Mondher Saïed) City Manager Bakaly presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public Works Director Brozyna also responded to Council questions. As this item should have been listed under Municipal Matters (per City Manager Bakaly) the public was invited to comment. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Page 13Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Maureen Ferguson Lewis Anna Taylor Action: To approve the staff recommendation. Motion Barragan, second Fangary. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS -CITY COUNCIL NONE 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL REPORT 15-0308 a)REQUEST FROM MAYOR TUCKER TO ASK STAFF TO COME BACK WITH A REPORT ON HOW TO PROCEED WITH UPDATING THE CITY STREET SIGNS AS PRESENTED BY GRAPHIC SOLUTIONS TO GIVE HERMOSA BEACH A NEW UPDATED LOOK. (Continued from Meeting of April 14, 2015) This item was continued. REPORT 15-0325 b)REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY TO EVALUATE AND UPDATE AS NEEDED THE CITY’S MASTER FEE RESOLUTION TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE FEES ARE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIFIC CITY SERVICES. THE CITY CURRENTLY HAS RESOLUTIONS THAT PROVIDE FOR PAYMENT OF PROCESSING FEES AS SET FORTH IN THE CITY’S MASTER FEE RESOLUTION, BUT NO SUCH PROCESSING FEES ARE PROVIDED. (Continued from Meeting of April 14, 2015) This item was continued. REPORT 15-0326 c)REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY TO EVALUATE AND PROVIDE DIRECTION REGARDING THE CITY’S NOTICE PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES/EVENTS AS NEEDED. EVALUATION AND DIRECTION SHOULD BE PROVIDED REGARDING THE MANNER OF PROVIDING NECESSARY NOTICES, AND PAYMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH NOTICES. (Continued from Meeting of April 14, 2015) Page 14Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 April 14, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft This item was continued. ADJOURNMENT Action: To adjourn the Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at 12:50 a.m., Wednesday, April 14, 2015 to the Adjourned Regular meeting (a joint City Council-Hermosa Beach City School District meeting) of Monday, April 27, 2015 at 6 p.m. Motion Barragan, second DiVirgilio. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Page 15Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015 Monday, April 27, 2015 6:00 PM Adjourned Regular Meeting (Joint Meeting with Hermosa Beach City School District) Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Council Chambers MAYOR CITY CLERK Peter Tucker Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Nanette Barragan Karen Nowicki COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Carolyn Petty Tom Bakaly Hany Fangary CITY ATTORNEY Michael DiVirgilio Mike Jenkins Meeting Minutes - Draft April 27, 2015City Council and Hermosa Beach City School District Meeting Minutes - Draft CALL TO ORDER 6:11 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Dency Nelson ROLL CALL Hermosa Beach City Council: Present: Barragan, Fangary, Petty, Mayor Tucker Absent:DiVirgilio (arrived at 6:14 p.m.) Hermosa Beach School District Board of Trustees: Present: Beste, Bove-Lamonica, Campbell, Claypoole, President Ackerman Absent: None Also present were City Manager Tom Bakaly, Assistant to the City Manager Diane Strickfaden, and School District Superintendent Patricia Escalante. ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilmember Fangary said area homelessness issues are to be discussed tonight at the main Redondo Beach Library, in an event sponsored by the League of Women Voters. 1. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Dency Nelson Archie Davenport, California Consulting LLC James Scott Monique Ehsan Carl Ingle Amy Freeburg Jessa Santangelo, U-Code Wayne Mogilefsky Rachelle Ally Page 1Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/4/2015 April 27, 2015City Council and Hermosa Beach City School District Meeting Minutes - Draft 2. REPORTS: REPORT 15-0343 a)2015-2016 JOINT PROGRAMMING OPPORTUNITIES: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT (City Manager Tom Bakaly and Hermosa Beach City School District Superintendent Pat Escalante) City Manager Bakaly presented an overview of the proposal for a Youth Enrichment Program to address the need for before- and after-school programs for Hermosa Beach students, with a City/School District cooperative agreement for shared resources. Superintendent Escalante provided additional information on the proposal. Comments/suggestions from members of the City Council, School Board and staff included: o Although it costs more, as much of an enrichment component to the program as feasible is desired. o The program will be successful only if spread out over both mornings and afternoons. o Outreach to parents is necessary, as demand is unknown at this time. o Parents should be provided with a menu so they can choose programs for kindergarteners. o Safety precautions are needed for children playing on the lawn at the Community Center. o Utilization of Prop A funds for shuttles should be considered. o Many available grants would not apply to Hermosa because it is an affluent city. o The extraordinary cooperation between the City and School District to make this program a reality was acknowledged. Action: To approve in concept the Hermosa Beach Youth Enrichment Project (HBYEP) and direct the preparation of a cooperative agreement, as recommended by staff. Motion Barragan, second Tucker. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0344 b)CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROPOSED TRAFFIC STUDY (City Manager Tom Bakaly and Hermosa Beach City School District Superintendent Pat Escalante) City Manager Bakaly introduced the item and provided a brief overview. Page 2Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/4/2015 April 27, 2015City Council and Hermosa Beach City School District Meeting Minutes - Draft Comments/suggestions from the City Council, School Board and staff included: o Using existing recent studies, plus tailoring additional more specific studies to school site areas, would be the best approach. o Determination of how the City and the School District would share costs of the studies is required. o Traffic studies might assist in the passage of a School District bond measure, as it could eliminate voter concerns. o Creative solutions for traffic issues should be sought. o A traffic officer at both school sites during certain times of the school day should be considered. Action: To consolidate existing City-wide traffic information with additional studies as needed around the three school sites. Motion Tucker, second DiVirgilio. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. ADJOURNMENT Action: To adjourn the Adjourned Regular meeting of the City Council (conducted jointly with Hermosa’s School Board) of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, on Monday, April 27, 2015, at 8:53 p.m., to the Regular meeting of Tuesday, April 28, 2015, to begin with a Closed Session at 6 p.m., followed by the Regular meeting at 7 p.m. Motion DiVirgilio, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Page 3Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/4/2015 Tuesday, April 28, 2015 6:00 PM Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Council Chambers City Council Mayor Peter Tucker Mayor Pro Tem Nanette Barragan Councilmembers Carolyn Petty Hany Fangary Michael DiVirgilio Meeting Minutes - Draft Closed Session -6pm, Regular City Council Meeting - 7pm April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft 6:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION (LOCATION: Meeting convenes in the Council Chambers and, after Public Comment, moves to the Second Floor Conference Room for the Closed Session) CALL TO ORDER IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS – 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: DiVirgilio, Fangary, Petty, Mayor Tucker Absent: Barragan PUBLIC COMMENT - None RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION - SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM –6:06 p.m. REPORT 15-03551.MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on April 14, 2015. REPORT 15-0324 2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Initiation of Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) Number of Potential Cases: 1 REPORT 15-0314 3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Quarterly Litigation Update The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) a) Name of Case: Bertucci v. City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number: BC543237 b) Name of Case: Green v. City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number: BC571125 c) Name of Case: Khanlian v. City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles Central Court, Case Number: BC570706 d) Name of Case: Merrill v. City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number: BC532065 e) Name of Case: Roberts et al v. City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number: BC544495 f) Name of Case: Yrigoyen v. City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles Central Court, Case Number: BC561167 Page 1Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft ADJOURNMENT OF CLOSED SESSION –7:05 p.m. 7:00 P.M. - REGULAR AGENDA CALL TO ORDER –7:16 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE –Peter Hoffman ROLL CALL Present: DiVirgilio, Fangary, Petty, Mayor Tucker Absent: Barragan (arrived at 8:32 p.m.) CLOSED SESSION REPORT City Attorney Jenkins said no public comment was received before recessing to Closed Session, nothing was added to the agenda and no reportable action was taken. ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilmember Fangary (1) noted his recent visit to Lancaster, along with City Manager Bakaly and Environmental Analyst Morris, to meet with that City’s staff about Lancaster’s carbon neutrality goals; (2) said he attended a Special Olympics fundraiser at the Comedy and Magic Club, sponsored by Hermosa’s Kiwanis Club; and encouraged residents to visit the Manhattan Beach Museum. Mayor Tucker spoke of last night's joint meeting with the Hermosa Beach City School Board of Trustees; and encouraged participation in this year’s Wyland Mayors' Challenge for Water Conservation, with more information at www.mywaterpledge.com. Action: To continue item 5(a) to the meeting of May 26, 2015. Motion Mayor Tucker, second DiVirgilio. The motion carried 4-0, noting the absence of Barragan. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS Page 2Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft REPORT 15-0348 a)INVESTMENT PLAN PRESENTED BY CITY TREASURER KAREN NOWICKI Investment Plan.pdfAttachments: City Treasurer Nowicki presented the Investment Plan and responded to Council questions. REPORT 15-0173 b)LEADERSHIP HERMOSA BEACH 2015 CLASS PROJECT SUPPLEMENTAL FitFest Flyer (added 4-29-15 at 4pm).pdfAttachments: Jeff Raedy and Adam Wald, co-directors of the 2015 Class Project, thanked the Council for its steadfast support and Community Resources staff for assisting with their 2015 project, a Fitness Festival taking place Saturday, May 30, beginning at 11 a.m., adding that more information could be found at www.fitfesthb.com. REPORT 15-0349 c)OUTSTANDING CITY AWARD TO HERMOSA BEACH FROM THE UNITED STATES MEXICO SISTER CITIES ASSOCIATION SUPPLEMENTAL Cinco de Mayo 2015 Flyer (added 4-29-15 at 4pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL History of Sister Cities (added 4-29-15 at 4pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Student Exchange Video Link (added 4-29-15 at 4pm).pdf Attachments: George Barks presented the award to Mayor Tucker; spoke of the long-standing sister city relationship between Hermosa and Loreto; and showed a short video of still images from a previous student visit. Planning Commissioner Peter Hoffman, an advocate of the Hermosa/ Loreto student exchange, called the program extraordinary. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Bill Brand, Redondo Beach Councilmember Adam Wald Dency Nelson Ryan Nowicki Craig Cadwallader, Surfrider Foundation South Bay Chapter Jose Bacallao Sheryl Main Katrina Bacallao Page 3Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Mariano Alvarez Barbara Ellman Allan Mason Betsy Ryan Viet Ngo Mayor pro tem Barragan arrived at 8:32 p.m. REPORT 15-0351 a)LETTERS REGARDING HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT COMPLAINT OF MARCH 3, 2015 Letter from Katrina Bacallao.pdf Letter from Jose Bacallao.pdf Letter from Marie Rice.pdf Attachments: Action: To receive and file the letters. Motion Fangary, second DiVirgilio. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0353 b)MEMORANDUM FROM HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE REGARDING CROSSFIT HORSEPOWER 725 CYPRESS AVE., HERMOSA BEACH Crossfit Memo 4.22.15.pdf Request for Information.pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Letter 1 from Alicia Villarreal (added 4-28-15 at 5pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Letter 2 from Alicia Villarreal (added 4-28-15 at 4pm).pdf Attachments: Two supplemental letters from Alicia Villareal received March 28, 2015. Action: To receive and file the letters. Motion DiVirgilio, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Additional Action: To reopen Public Participation to allow additional comment from those who wrote letters regarding Crossfit Horsepower. Motion DiVirgilio, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Phil Friedl Michael Binder Page 4Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Larry Nakamura Jeff Duclos Robert Walsh Rebecca Nakamura Lauren Pizer Mains Mariano Alvarez Betsy Ryan Dan Wells 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (p) with the exception of the following items, which were removed for discussion in item 4, but are shown in order for clarity: 2(a), (c) and (i), Fangary; 2(p), Barragan; and 2(l), Tucker. Motion DiVirgilio, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. REPORT 15-0352 a)CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES (Continued from meeting of April 28, 2015) (City Clerk Elaine Doerfling) 052814 minutesAttachments: This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Fangary for discussion later in the meeting, but was subsequently continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015. REPORT 15-0337 b)CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Page 5Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Check Register 4-9-2015 Check Register 4-9-2015 (2) Check Register 4-16-2015 Attachments: Action: To ratify the check registers as presented. REPORT 15-0347 c)TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (Continued from meeting of April 28, 2015) Tentative Future Agenda.docAttachments: This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Fangary for separate discussion later in the meeting, but was subsequently continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015. REPORT 15-0362 d)REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS FOR FEBRUARY 2015 (Finance Director Viki Copeland) February 2015 Revenue Status Report February 2015 Expenditure Status Report Attachments: Action: To receive and file the February 2015 Financial Reports. REPORT 15-0360 e)REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS FOR MARCH 2015 (Finance Director Viki Copeland) March 2015 revenue status report March 2015 expenditure status report Attachments: Action: To receive and file the March 2015 Financial Reports. REPORT 15-0336 f)CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) March 2015 Treasurer Report.pdf March 2015 Cash Balances.pdf Attachments: Action: To receive and file the Reports. REPORT 15-0335 g)CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Action: To approve the cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. REPORT 15-0369 h)ACTION SHEEET OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 21, 2015 Page 6Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Pl. Comm. Action Sheet 4-21-15.docAttachments: Action: To approve the action sheet of the Planning Commission meeting of April 21, 2015. REPORT 15-0341 i)ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 18, 2015. action minutes 3-18-15Attachments: This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Fangary for separate discussion later in the meeting, but was subsequently continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015. REPORT 15-0342 j)PROJECT STATUS REPORT AS OF MARCH 31, 2015 (Public Works Director Andrew Brozyna) CIP Project Summary Mar 2015Attachments: Action: To receive and file the Project Status Report of March 31, 2015. REPORT 15-0332k)PARKING STRUCTURE COUNTING SYSTEM AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (Project Manager Mondher Saied and Economic Development Officer Shelli Margolin-Mayer) Attachment 1-Green Giant Construction Contract.pdf Attachments 2,3,4.pdf Attachments Attachments: Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Award the Construction Contract to Green Giant Landscape Inc. to provide construction services for the Parking Structure Counting System in the amount of $58,000.00; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the attached Construction Contract subject to approval by the City Attorney (Attachment - 1); 3) Authorize an additional appropriation of $29,580 from the General Fund's fund balance; and 4. Authorize the Director of Public Works to make changes to the contract within the project budget. REPORT 15-0363 l)EXTEND CITY FEE WAIVERS, REDUCTIONS AND INCENTIVES FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR PROJECTS, SMALL WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS, ENERGY UPGRADE CALIFORNIA AND HERO PROJECTS, AND OTHER INITIATIVES TO ADVANCE SUSTAINABILITY (Continued from meeting of April 28, 2015) (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris) This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Tucker for separate discussion later in the meeting, but was then continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015. Page 7Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft m) REPORT SUBJECT: FINAL MAP NO. 72187 (C.U.P. CON NO. 13-5, 15-0333 PDP NO. 13-6) LOCATION: 1515 HERMOSA AVENUE APPLICANT(S): 1515 HERMOSA AVENUE llc REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR A 2-UNIT RESIDENTIALCONDOMINIUM PROJECT (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) 1515 Hermosa Ave Resolution.docxAttachments: Action: To adopt Resolution No. 15-6952, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 72187, FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF A TWO-UNIT CONDOMINIUM, LOCATED AT 1515 HERMOSA AVENUE IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." REPORT 15-0350 n)AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT NO. 83-100 RELATING TO JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT APPROVING THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE WORKFORCE PROGRAMS UNDER THE NEW WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (City Manager Tom Bakaly) Amend7(WIOA)rev 2 031815.pdfAttachments: Action: To approve the amendment, as recommended by staff. REPORT o)APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RAIMI + ASSOCIATES TO PROVIDE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR AN INTEGRATED GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND COASTAL LAND USE PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT BY AMENDING THE SCOPE OF WORK AND COST BY UP TO $68,600 (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Raimi PSA Amendment-4-28-2015.pdfAttachments: Action: To approve the amendment, as recommended by staff. REPORT 15-0366 p)ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AMENDING THE OUTDOOR DINING AND DESIGN STANDARDS FOR PIER PLAZA (INCLUDING LORETO PLAZA) Page 8Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft (Continued from meeting of April 28, 2015) (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Outdoor Dining Standards on Pier Plaza - Resolution.docxAttachments: This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor pro tem Barragan for discussion later in the meeting, but was subsequently continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015. At 9:03 p.m., the order of the agenda moved to item 5(b). 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES -None 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 2(a), (c), (i), (l) and (p) were removed from the consent calendar this evening for separate discussion, but were subsequently continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015, and will be under item 4 on that agenda. REPORT 15-0340 a)CIP 14-163 PROTECTIVE BOLLARDS ALONG THE STRAND APPROVE INSTALLATION (Continued from Meeting of April 14, 2015) (Project Manager Mondher Saied) Notice to Residents-March 2015.doc Radius Map Strand Traffic Delineators - March 2015.pdf Location of Bollards.pdf Do Not enter Sign.doc Colors of Reflective Bands .pdf Correspondence from Sandy Saemann.pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Letter from Sandy Saemann (added 4-28-15 at 2pm).pdf Attachments: Councilmember DiVirgilio left the meeting at 11:16 p.m. Public Works Director Brozyna presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Bakaly and Police Sargeant Robert Higgins also responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Sandy Saemann Page 9Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Action: To direct staff to research more effective and more aesthetically pleasing options, present those options to the Public Works Commission for review and recommendation, and return to Council for approval. Motion Tucker, second Barragan. The motion carried (DiVirgilio absent) Proposed Action: To continue on with the meeting until 12:30 a.m, and take up items 4(b) and 6(c). Motion Fangary, second Mayor Tucker. The motion failed, with Fangary casting the only affirmative vote. At this time, it was the consensus of the Council to continue the remaining agenda items to the meeting of May 11, 2015. REPORT 15-0317 b)AMEND THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BRENDLE GROUP BY ADDING $13,120 TO DEVELOP A TOOL FOR MUNICIPAL CARBON NEUTRALITY PLANNING AND TRACKING (Continued from Meeting of April 14, 2015) (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris) Hermosa Beach Phase 2 Proposal - 041415docx.pdf Brendle-Amendment.pdf This item was continued. Attachments: 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS REPORT 15-0364 a)AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 5.76 (CIGARETTE AND TOBACCO RETAILERS) REQUIRING LICENSURE OF CIGARETTE AND TOBACCO RETAILERS TO REDUCE THE ILLEGAL SALE OF TOBACCO TO MINORS, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.40 TO EXPAND THE DEFINITION OF SMOKING TO INCLUDE ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES, AND MAKING VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER 5.76 SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY PROCEDURES (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) This item was continued earlier in this meeting to May 26, 2015, as recommended by a motion that carried 4-0. (Barragan absent) REPORT 15-0365 b)CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 8.44 RELATING TO LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND POLLUTION CONTROL AND REPEALING CONFLICTING OR REDUNDANT PROVISIONS OF THE GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS IN CHAPTER 15.48. AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL Page 10Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft QUALITY ACT AND APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE GREEN STREETS POLICY (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris) Hermosa Beach LID and Stormwater Ord Green Street Policy - Hermosa Beach Attachments: Environmental Analyst Morris presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Kathleen McGowan, Geosyntec P.E., responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 9:19 p.m. As no one came forward, the public hearing closed at 9:19 p.m. Action: To approve staff recommendation to: 1) Waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 15-1351, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND POLUTION CONTROL AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE AND REPEALING CONFLICTING OR REDUNDANT PROVISIONS OF THE GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS"; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 15-6953, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GREEN STREET POLICY FOR STREET AND ROADWAY PROJECTS." Motion DiVirgilio, second Barragan. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS REPORT 15-0346 a)CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSAL TO INCREASE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX (TOT) FROM 10% TO 12% (Finance Director Viki Copeland) TOT Rate Update FINAL 4-7-15 SUPPLEMENTAL Letter from Betsy Ryan (added 4-28-15 at 2pm).pdf Attachments: Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins responded to Council questions. Page 11Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Jeff Duclos Dency Nelson Lauren Pizer Mains Betsy Ryan Isabel Rodriguez Mariano Alvarez Action: To direct staff to prepare a measure for the November 3, 2015 election to allow voters to decide whether to increase the TOT from 10% to 12%; and to direct the City Attorney to investigate whether the TOT applies to vacation rentals. Motion Fangary, second Barragan. The motion, which required four affirmative votes to pass, failed due to the dissenting votes of DiVirgilio and Petty. REPORT 15-0357 b)APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR SEWER SERVICES CHARGES AND SETTING A MAJORITY PROTEST HEARING FOR JUNE 23, 2015 (Public Works Director Andrew Brozyna) Sewer Study Presentation draft 4-6-15 pg 5 Fee Options_Atttch1 Resolution approving sewer charge engineer's report_Attch 2 Sewer Master Plan Update_Attch 3 HB Sewer 218 Notice 2015 - DRAFT with logo City of Hermosa Beach Sewer Study Presentation 1draft 4-20-15_Attch5 SUPPLEMENTAL Memorandum from Andrew Brozyna (added 4-27-15 at 7pm).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Letter from Sam Perrotti (added 4-27-15 at 7pm).pdf Attachments: At 10:06 p.m., the meeting recessed. At 10:17 p.m., the meeting reconvened. Action: To continue on with tonight's meeting until midnight. Motion Fangary, second Petty. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Public Works Director Brozyna presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Bakaly responded to Council questions. Jeff Cooper, PENCO Engineering Vice President, gave a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Council questions. Page 12Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: George Barks Proposed Action: To adopt Resolution No. 15-6954, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT AND SCHEDULING A MAJORITY PROTEST HEARING FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE CHARGE”; to direct staff to proceed with securing a 15 year bond; to raise the annual operation and maintenance fee to $450,000; and to increase the annual tax for single family residences to $131. Motion Fangary, second DiVirgilio. The motion was replaced by the following substitute motion. Substitute Action: To adopt Resolution No. 15-6954, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT AND SCHEDULING A MAJORITY PROTEST HEARING FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE CHARGE”; to direct staff to proceed with securing a 15 year or 20 year bond; and to increase the annual tax for single family residences to $115. Motion Petty, second Barragan. The motion carried 4-1, noting the dissenting vote of Fangary. REPORT 15-0356 c)OIL FINANCING UPDATE (Continued from meeting of April 28, 2015) (City Manager Tom Bakaly) This item was continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015. REPORT 15-0345 d)OPTIONS FOR CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CERTIFICATION OF AES REDONDO ENERGY PLANT (Continued from meeting of April 28, 2015) (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) 07-22-14 AES Staff Report Memo from Ken Robertson.pdf CEC Committee Scheduling Order.pdf SUPPLEMENTAL CEC Revised Committee Scheduling Order (added 5-11-15 at 11am).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL CEC Staff record of conversation with RB (added 5-11-15 at 9am).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Draft Resolution from RB Councilmember Brand (added 5-11-15 at 9am).pdf SUPPLEMENTAL Petition from Betsy Ryan (added 5-11-15 at 1pm).pdf Attachments: This item was continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015. Page 13Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft REPORT 15-0367 e)WATER CONSERVATION UPDATE (Continued from meeting of April 28, 2015) (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris) City of Hermosa Beach Water Conservation and Drought Management Plan.docx Attachments: This item was continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER REPORT 15-0368 a) PLASTIC BAG BAN UPDATE (Continued from meeting of April 28, 2015) (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris) This item was continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS -CITY COUNCIL NONE 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL REPORT 15-0308 a)REQUEST FROM MAYOR TUCKER TO ASK STAFF TO COME BACK WITH A REPORT ON HOW TO PROCEED WITH UPDATING THE CITY STREET SIGNS AS PRESENTED BY GRAPHIC SOLUTIONS TO GIVE HERMOSA BEACH A NEW UPDATED LOOK. (Continued from Meeting of April 14, 2015) This item was continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015. REPORT 15-0325 b)REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY TO EVALUATE AND UPDATE AS NEEDED THE CITY’S MASTER FEE RESOLUTION TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE FEES ARE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIFIC CITY SERVICES. THE CITY CURRENTLY HAS RESOLUTIONS THAT PROVIDE FOR PAYMENT OF PROCESSING FEES AS SET FORTH IN THE CITY’S MASTER FEE RESOLUTION, Page 14Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft BUT NO SUCH PROCESSING FEES ARE PROVIDED. (Continued from Meeting of April 14, 2015) This item was continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015. REPORT 15-0326 c)REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER FANGARY TO EVALUATE AND PROVIDE DIRECTION REGARDING THE CITY’S NOTICE PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES/EVENTS AS NEEDED. EVALUATION AND DIRECTION SHOULD BE PROVIDED REGARDING THE MANNER OF PROVIDING NECESSARY NOTICES, AND PAYMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH NOTICES. (Continued from Meeting of April 14, 2015) This item was continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015. REPORT 15-0354 d)REQUEST FROM COUNCILMEMBER PETTY TO REVISIT OPERATION CLEAN SWEEP, WHICH ELIMINATED SIGNAGE AND DISPLAYS ON PIER AVENUE. REQUEST THAT THE COUNCIL DISCUSS MODIFIED STANDARDS THAT PERMIT LIMITED SIGNAGE AND/OR APPROVED DISPLAYS THAT PROMOTE BUSINESSES YET DO NOT IMPEDE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. (Continued from meeting of April 28, 2015) This item was continued to the meeting of May 11, 2015. ADJOURNMENT Action: To adjourn the meeting at 12:13 a.m., Wednesday, April 29, 2015, to an Adjourned Regular meeting (a joint Planning Commission/Council meeting) at 6 p.m., Monday, May 11, 2015 in Council Chambers, which will be immediately adjourn to an Adjourned Regular meeting to discuss the continued items from the April 28, 2015 Regular meeting, which will adjourn to a 6 p.m. Closed Session prior to the Regular meeting of Tuesday, May 12, 2015, in Council Chambers. Motion Barragan, second Petty. The motion carried 4-0 (DiVirgilio absent) Page 15Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 April 28, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Page 16Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/11/2015 Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0819 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommended Action: To ratify the following check registers. Attachments: 1.Check Register 11/5/15 2.Check Register 11/12/15 Approved: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/05/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 4:10:51PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79660 11/5/2015 A AND A READY MIXED 2085726 CONCRETE/LOT D17588 001-3104-4309 479.06 Total : 479.0617588 79661 11/5/2015 AESCO 200706112 SURF LEGENDS MATERIAL TEST/INSPECT/SEP1519319 150-8661-4201 2,200.00 Total : 2,200.0019319 79662 11/5/2015 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 40778 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 9/27/15-10/10/1506827 001-2102-4201 5,499.00 Total : 5,499.0006827 79663 11/5/2015 AQUA FLO 777909 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/JUN1509366 001-6101-4309 -372.68 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/AUG15818526 001-6101-4309 7.65 SEAVIEW PARK/FORT LOTS OF FUN/FOUNTAIN837654 001-8667-4201 3,812.17 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/OCT15837668 001-6101-4309 252.49 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/OCT15843778 001-6101-4309 216.45 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/OCT15843783 001-6101-4309 638.16 Total : 4,554.2409366 79664 11/5/2015 ARROYO, ERIC 729 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS/OCT1513609 001-2101-4201 800.00 Total : 800.0013609 79665 11/5/2015 AT AND T 000007173031 LONG DIST CHARGES 9/13/15-10/12/1516510 001-1121-4304 0.19 001-1132-4304 0.02 001-1141-4304 0.06 001-1201-4304 0.95 001-1202-4304 0.26 001-1203-4304 0.19 001-1208-4304 0.01 11/05/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 4:10:51PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79665 11/5/2015 (Continued)AT AND T16510 001-2101-4304 3.61 001-2201-4304 1.03 001-4201-4304 1.34 001-4202-4304 1.17 001-4204-4321 0.09 001-4601-4304 0.51 001-1204-4304 1.44 001-3302-4304 0.21 715-1206-4304 0.10 001-4101-4304 0.33 Total : 11.5116510 79666 11/5/2015 BEST QUALITY HEATING AND AIR 1005 SHOOTING RANGE/AC VENT INSTALLATION19571 001-8614-4201 3,775.00 Total : 3,775.0019571 79667 11/5/2015 BOUNDTREE MEDICAL LLC 81943326 MEDICAL SUPPLIES/OCT1508482 001-2201-4309 57.67 Total : 57.6708482 79668 11/5/2015 BRANDMAN UNIVERSITY Student ID B00230523 TUITION/DE LOS SANTOS/FALL 216992 001-2201-4317 1,906.93 Total : 1,906.9316992 79669 11/5/2015 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 1280022 PRISONER LAUNDRY/OCT1500163 001-2101-4306 56.22 Total : 56.2200163 79670 11/5/2015 BRUNN, OFFICER GEORGE PO 7804 Per Diem PER DIEM/INTERNAL AFFAIRS TRAINING11620 001-2101-4312 45.00 Total : 45.0011620 79671 11/5/2015 BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORP 298130 5,000 2-SIDED NOTICE CARDS00034 001-3302-4305 623.18 Total : 623.1800034 79672 11/5/2015 CANNON, LISA M PO 7830 TRUCK SMOKE OPACITY TEST16683 715-2201-4311 250.00 11/05/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 4:10:51PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 250.00 79672 11/5/2015 CANNON, LISA M16683 79673 11/5/2015 CDWG WS52997A RESTOCKING FEE REFUND/DIGITAL CAMERA09632 001-2101-4305 -22.50 PRINTER TONERZV08131 001-3302-4305 556.60 Total : 534.1009632 79674 11/5/2015 CONCAS, ERIN PO 7767/TR 460 MILEAGE/ICS 300 TRAINING19538 001-2201-4317 128.23 Total : 128.2319538 79675 11/5/2015 CONCEPT CONSULTANT INC Progress Payment #4 CIP 10-661 SURF MEMORIAL CONSTRUCTION19414 150-8661-4201 26,440.66 001-8661-4201 67,000.00 Total : 93,440.6619414 79676 11/5/2015 COPY SHOP, THE 44836 LAMINATED MAPS FOR EOC00022 001-2201-4305 75.34 Total : 75.3400022 79677 11/5/2015 DANIEL, JOEL PO 7846 2015 ASSESSMENT TAX REBATE10702 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.6110702 79678 11/5/2015 DE LOS SANTOS, JIMMY PO 7797 TEXTBOOK REIMB/FALL 2015 SEMESTER11355 001-2201-4317 59.05 Total : 59.0511355 79679 11/5/2015 DIV OF THE STATE ARCHITECT Jul thru Sep '15 BUSINESS LICENSE FEES/1ST QTR18263 001-6851 165.60 Total : 165.6018263 79680 11/5/2015 DUNCAN PARKING TECHNOLOGIES DPT023838 KEYS00122 001-3302-4309 815.55 Total : 815.5500122 79681 11/5/2015 EMERGENCY SPEC PHYS Acct#T55259757 EMPLOYEE FIRST AID/OCT1514033 001-1203-4320 748.00 11/05/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 4:10:51PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 748.00 79681 11/5/2015 EMERGENCY SPEC PHYS14033 79682 11/5/2015 EMMANUEL GODINEZ 1507 AED REPLACEMENT BATTERIES19568 001-8606-4201 1,000.00 Total : 1,000.0019568 79683 11/5/2015 ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO.0112627-IN FIRE CHIEF BADGE11103 001-2201-4314 120.45 Total : 120.4511103 79684 11/5/2015 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 5-201-41016 EXPRESS MAIL TO THEFT DOTS01962 001-2101-4305 18.08 Total : 18.0801962 79685 11/5/2015 GHASSEMI PETTY CASH, MARIA 1141-07874 PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT05125 001-1101-4319 97.00 001-1121-4305 34.88 001-1201-4315 35.00 001-1201-4317 39.15 001-2101-4201 33.22 001-2101-4305 57.65 001-2101-4306 51.10 001-2201-4305 127.78 001-3104-4309 97.29 001-4101-4305 17.00 001-4101-4317 79.74 001-4201-4305 134.95 001-4201-4315 75.00 001-4202-4317 68.43 715-1206-4305 58.80 170-2105-5401 30.51 170-2105-4317 27.37 Total : 1,064.8705125 79686 11/5/2015 HDL COREN AND CONE 0022068-IN PROPERTY TAX SERVICES/2ND QTR 201503131 001-1202-4201 1,375.00 Total : 1,375.0003131 79687 11/5/2015 HERMOSA AUTOMOTIVE INC 34736 '14 CHEVY G3500 ALIGNMENT09136 715-2201-4311 60.00 11/05/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 4:10:51PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 60.00 79687 11/5/2015 HERMOSA AUTOMOTIVE INC09136 79688 11/5/2015 HILTON SAN FRANCISCO TR 473 Hotel SMITH/NARCOTIC OFFICERS TRAINING/HOTEL13317 001-2101-4317 768.57 Total : 768.5713317 79689 11/5/2015 HUNTINGTON BEACH MOTORSPORTS 84417 16K MILE SERVICE/2011 HONDA16793 715-2101-4311 3,327.22 Total : 3,327.2216793 79690 11/5/2015 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS IN-000565878 SCALES16742 001-4101-4305 26.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES/OCT15IN-000566642 001-1202-4305 68.82 001-1141-4305 59.77 001-1208-4305 13.64 Total : 168.5216742 79691 11/5/2015 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 250339-00 CONDUIT02458 001-2022 -3.48 001-2021 3.48 105-2601-4309 186.19 Total : 186.1902458 79692 11/5/2015 INTERNATIONAL INST OF Membership Renewal DOERFLING/MEMBERSHIP THRU 12/31/1600668 001-1121-4315 180.00 Total : 180.0000668 79693 11/5/2015 KO PO'OKELA CULTURAL FOUNDATIO 2000420.003 THEATRE DEPOST REFUND/STAFF OVERPAYMENT19572 001-2111 506.25 Total : 506.2519572 79694 11/5/2015 KOGER, ASHLEY PO 7845 REIMB/PASSPORT TO WELLNESS KICKOFF LUNCH19371 001-1201-4305 330.65 Total : 330.6519371 79695 11/5/2015 KOSMONT COMPANIES 0001 DOWNTOWN IMPACT/BENEFIT ANALYSIS/SEP1518137 001-1202-4201 5,863.00 Total : 5,863.0018137 11/05/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 4:10:51PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79696 11/5/2015 LA CO METRO TRANSPORTATION 800061739 TAPS BUS PASS SALES/AUG1515782 145-3403-4251 163.00 Total : 163.0015782 79697 11/5/2015 LA CO SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT 160988SS PRISONER MEALS/SEP1500151 001-2101-4306 93.65 Total : 93.6500151 79698 11/5/2015 LEARNED LUMBER B477711 STRAW HAT, WOOD00167 001-6101-4309 39.86 NAIL STOPPER, SCREWDRIVERSB478977 001-4204-4309 21.09 PLYWOODB479242 715-4204-4201 486.64 PLYWOODB479243 715-4204-4201 171.77 Total : 719.3600167 79699 11/5/2015 LILY PAD FLORAL DESIGN INC 1718 VETERAN'S DAY FLORAL ARRANGEMENTS10655 001-4601-4308 152.60 Total : 152.6010655 79700 11/5/2015 MARTIN CHEVROLET 721416 SWITCH15912 715-2201-4311 37.82 Total : 37.8215912 79701 11/5/2015 MC GRADE, KATHLEEN 8069 ANNUAL LADDER TESTING09529 001-2201-4201 496.20 Total : 496.2009529 79702 11/5/2015 MONDRAGON, FREDERICK JOSEPH ACA-101 PARK YOUTH PROGRAM COUNSELOR TRAINING19570 001-4601-4317 150.00 Total : 150.0019570 79703 11/5/2015 MONTROSE AND ASSOCIATES INC 25311 A/V CONSULTING SERVICES/OCT1513791 715-4204-4201 540.00 Total : 540.0013791 79704 11/5/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 799593413001 OFFICE SUPPLIES/OCT1513114 001-1202-4305 -18.68 11/05/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 4:10:51PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79704 11/5/2015 (Continued)OFFICE DEPOT13114 OFFICE SUPPLIES/OCT15799982783001 001-1204-4305 30.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES/OCT15800918109001 001-1204-4305 166.76 Total : 178.5913114 79705 11/5/2015 ORTLEY TRANSPORTATION 3522 AFTERSCHOOL SHUTTLE/SEP16TH-SEP29TH17007 145-3411-4201 2,400.00 AFTERSCHOOL SHUTTLE/SEP30TH-OCT14TH3523 145-3411-4201 2,400.00 Total : 4,800.0017007 79706 11/5/2015 PEP BOYS 08141037317 AUTO SUPPLIES/OCT1500608 715-2101-4311 23.28 Total : 23.2800608 79707 11/5/2015 PITNEY BOWES INC 8000-9090-0650-6807 POSTAGE METER REFILL/AUG1513838 715-1208-4201 2,015.00 POSTAGE METER REFILL/FEES/OCT158000-9090-0650-6807 715-1208-4201 25.99 Total : 2,040.9913838 79708 11/5/2015 POELSTRA, GERRITT PO 7805 Per Diem PER DIEM/INTERNAL AFFAIRS TRAINING15701 001-2101-4312 45.00 Total : 45.0015701 79709 11/5/2015 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 40968779 UNIFORM RENTAL17676 001-4202-4314 46.27 Total : 46.2717676 79710 11/5/2015 RAIMI AND ASSOCIATES INC 15-1109R GENERAL PLAN UPDATE/JUL & AUG1518223 001-4104-4201 50,356.48 150-4104-4201 34,001.75 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE/TRAVEL EXP/AUG1515-1110 001-4101-4201 6,688.16 Total : 91,046.3918223 79711 11/5/2015 RALPH ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES 11938 CLASS & COMP STUDY/OCT1518530 001-1203-4251 1,950.00 11/05/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 4:10:51PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 1,950.00 79711 11/5/2015 RALPH ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES18530 79712 11/5/2015 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 20150921760 VACCINATION SERVICES/SEP1519560 001-1203-4320 270.00 Total : 270.0019560 79713 11/5/2015 RB CERT ALUMNI ASSOCIATION PO 7807 FLOOR MONITOR BAGS19566 001-2201-5401 200.00 Total : 200.0019566 79714 11/5/2015 REDONDO GLASS INC PO 4202-07347 CLARK BLDG WINDOW REPLACEMENT19479 001-4204-4201 239.00 Total : 239.0019479 79715 11/5/2015 ROUND STAR WEST LLC PO 7706 INSTRUCT PMT/5828/30/32/34/36/38/4016921 001-4601-4221 3,248.70 Total : 3,248.7016921 79716 11/5/2015 S AND J SALES 13486 BATTERY SYSTEM/DOWNTOWN CAMERA PROJECT02500 153-2106-4201 3,125.20 Total : 3,125.2002500 79717 11/5/2015 SCMAF 3847 MEMBERSHIP/ORTA/NICHOLS/DIERS/SHATTUCK/A19542 001-4601-4315 310.00 Total : 310.0019542 79718 11/5/2015 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 9684-1 PAINTING SUPPLIES/OCT1517903 001-4204-4309 31.95 Total : 31.9517903 79719 11/5/2015 SMITH, JAMES TR 473 Per Diem PER DIEM/NARCOTIC OFFICER'S TRAINING19483 001-2101-4317 200.00 Total : 200.0019483 79720 11/5/2015 SOUTH BAY FORD 472751 AUTO PARTS PURCHASE/OCT1510532 715-2201-4311 13.17 AUTO PARTS PURCHASE/OCT15472992 715-2201-4311 133.68 Total : 146.8510532 11/05/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 4:10:51PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79721 11/5/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 2-01-414-1071 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT1500159 001-4204-4303 2,995.53 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-01-414-2152 001-6101-4303 7,374.74 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-01-414-3747 105-2601-4303 55.83 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-01-414-3994 160-3102-4303 60.18 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-01-414-4281 105-2601-4303 436.71 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-01-414-5106 001-3104-4303 453.18 Total : 11,376.1700159 79722 11/5/2015 SPICERS PAPER INC 1241125 8.5 X 11 COPY PAPER10232 001-1208-4305 1,300.32 001-2021 12.04 001-2022 -12.04 Total : 1,300.3210232 79723 11/5/2015 T MOBILE 946625962 CELL PHONES/OCT1519082 001-2101-4201 510.36 001-2101-4304 272.41 001-3302-4304 50.64 Total : 833.4119082 79724 11/5/2015 TEAK WAREHOUSE INC 14332 MARY ELLEN RAE MEMORIAL BENCH15040 001-6101-5402 866.55 Total : 866.5515040 79725 11/5/2015 TIME WARNER CABLE 8448 30 030 0340764 FD/CABLE/NOV1515277 001-2201-4201 137.54 Total : 137.5415277 79726 11/5/2015 TRIANGLE HARDWARE Stmt Close 11/6/15 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/OCT1500123 001-2201-4309 51.02 001-3104-4309 760.09 001-4204-4309 451.78 001-6101-4309 440.62 11/05/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 4:10:51PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79726 11/5/2015 (Continued)TRIANGLE HARDWARE00123 105-2601-4309 1,412.23 715-4206-4309 219.01 001-2021 115.60 001-2022 -115.60 Total : 3,334.7500123 79727 11/5/2015 TUCKER, PETER C.PO 7811/TR 436 HOTEL REIMB/LEAGE OF CA CITIES CONF01427 001-1101-4317 460.30 Total : 460.3001427 79728 11/5/2015 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 69591817 VOIP SERVICES/EOC GYM/SEP1518666 001-2201-4304 61.17 Total : 61.1718666 79729 11/5/2015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 310 PL0-0347 CIRCUIT BILLING 10/19/15-11/18/1500015 001-2101-4304 47.51 CIRCUIT BILLING/NOV15310 UH0-3618 001-2101-4304 395.71 Total : 443.2200015 79730 11/5/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS LA 9754045425 IN-FIELD FINGERPRINT DEVICES03209 153-2106-4201 134.80 Total : 134.8003209 79731 11/5/2015 WESTERN ENGINEERING GROUP 02 CIP 14-541/CLARK FIELD18629 125-8541-4201 9,000.00 Total : 9,000.0018629 79732 11/5/2015 WYATT, MELANIE PO 7705 INSTRUCT PMT/5898/590219569 001-4601-4221 1,050.00 Total : 1,050.0019569 79733 11/5/2015 ZOLL MEDICAL CORP 2299519 REUSABLE PATIENT CABLE10505 001-2201-4309 183.94 Total : 183.9410505 79734 11/5/2015 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 0161399 STREET SIGN MAINT MATERIAL/OCT1501206 001-3104-4309 792.64 STREET SIGN MAINT MATERIAL/OCT150161444 11/05/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 4:10:51PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79734 11/5/2015 (Continued)ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC01206 001-3104-4309 229.54 STREET SIGN MAINTENANCE MATERIAL/OCT150161445 001-3104-4309 404.58 Total : 1,426.7601206 1550017 11/5/2015 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 11052015 PAYROLL 10/16 TO 10/31/1500243 001-1103 781,631.48 105-1103 5,287.48 117-1103 3,088.89 145-1103 3.66 152-1103 56.23 160-1103 3,571.58 161-1103 2,912.91 705-1103 4,683.87 715-1103 7,419.36 Total : 808,655.4600243 1535513614 11/3/2015 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 11/5 Check Run WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS REIMB/OCT1514691 705-1217-4324 7,036.05 Total : 7,036.0514691 Bank total : 1,087,773.04 77 Vouchers for bank code :boa 1,087,773.04Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 77 11/05/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12 4:10:51PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 12 inclusive, of the check register for 11-5-15 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Finance Director Date 11-17-15 11/12/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 3:06:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79735 11/12/2015 A T AND T 248 134-9454 CIRCUIT BILLING/NOV1500321 001-2101-4304 28.22 Total : 28.2200321 79736 11/12/2015 AETNA Claim#W214786843 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REFUND19581 001-3840 348.62 Total : 348.6219581 79737 11/12/2015 AIR SOURCE INDUSTRIES INC 00658329 OXYGEN REFILL/HAZ MAT/OCT1506290 001-2201-4309 401.50 Total : 401.5006290 79738 11/12/2015 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 40914 CROSSING GUARD SERVICE 10/11/15-10/24/1506827 001-2102-4201 5,499.00 Total : 5,499.0006827 79739 11/12/2015 AMERICAS TROPHY COMPANY PO 4202-07532 MARY ELLEN RAE TEAK MEMORIAL BENCH12470 001-6101-5402 186.94 Total : 186.9412470 79740 11/12/2015 AMGRAPH GROUP, INC 24705 VETERAN'S DAY/FLAG INSTALL/REMOVE17965 001-1101-4319 2,124.00 Total : 2,124.0017965 79741 11/12/2015 AT&T MOBILITY 287261798668X1108201 PUBLIC WORKS/YARD/CELL PHONES/OCT1513361 001-4202-4304 741.83 Total : 741.8313361 79742 11/12/2015 AZTEC TECHNOLOGY CORP 47368 PD RECORDS STORAGE CONTAINER RENTAL19578 001-8614-4201 692.15 Total : 692.1519578 79743 11/12/2015 BLUEPRINT SERVICE AND SUPPLY 200063 CIP 14-632 FIRE TOWER DEMO COPY SRVCS03190 001-4202-4305 272.37 Total : 272.3703190 79744 11/12/2015 BOUNDTREE MEDICAL LLC 81953937 MEDICAL SUPPLIES/OCT1508482 001-2201-4309 21.06 11/12/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 3:06:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 21.06 79744 11/12/2015 BOUNDTREE MEDICAL LLC08482 79745 11/12/2015 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 1281421 PRISONER LAUNDRY/OCT1500163 001-2101-4306 60.98 Total : 60.9800163 79746 11/12/2015 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 4948 NAME PLATE/BONANO00262 001-2201-4305 11.12 Total : 11.1200262 79747 11/12/2015 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE Acct# 4286211111 WATER USAGE/OCT1500016 105-2601-4303 2,985.49 001-6101-4303 18,364.38 001-4204-4303 5,276.29 001-3304-4303 333.67 Total : 26,959.8300016 79748 11/12/2015 CHEVRON AND TEXACO CARD SER 45854548 GAS CARD PURCHASES/OCT1500634 715-2101-4310 218.73 Total : 218.7300634 79749 11/12/2015 COMPLETES PLUS 01UI6525 AUTO REPAIR PARTS/OCT1509436 715-2101-4311 52.64 Total : 52.6409436 79750 11/12/2015 DEWEY PEST CONTROL Acct#1233239 PEST CONTROL/SEWER RAT/NOV1511449 160-3102-4201 200.00 PEST CONTROL/SEWER RAT/NOV15Acct#759408 001-4204-4201 651.00 Total : 851.0011449 79751 11/12/2015 EASY READER Statement No. 3206 LEGAL ADS 9/3/5-10/22/1500181 001-1121-4323 3,153.76 Total : 3,153.7600181 79752 11/12/2015 EVERLAST CLIMBING INDUSTRIES INV-00008825 CUSTOM BIKE RACKS19576 001-1201-4201 9,934.28 Total : 9,934.2819576 79753 11/12/2015 FIRST CALL STAFFING SERVICES 00709-150933 TEMP SERVICES W/E 10/25/1506344 11/12/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 3:06:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79753 11/12/2015 (Continued)FIRST CALL STAFFING SERVICES06344 001-4201-4112 465.00 Total : 465.0006344 79754 11/12/2015 GALLS LLC BC0203555 UNIFORM/CAMERZALL01320 001-3302-4314 741.79 HEMMING/ALTERATIONS/BONANOBC0203826 001-2201-4314 12.22 SHIRT/PATCHES/BONANOBC0204378 001-2201-4314 30.75 Total : 784.7601320 79755 11/12/2015 HAJOCA CORP S146526751.001 PLUMBING SUPPLIES/OCT1513330 001-4204-4309 41.19 Total : 41.1913330 79756 11/12/2015 HERMOSA AUTOMOTIVE INC 34856 SMOG CHECK & CERTIFICATE/'04 CROWN VIC09136 715-2101-4311 50.00 Total : 50.0009136 79757 11/12/2015 HERTZ VEHICLES PO 7777 REFUND/CITATION 200181384/LICENSE 789ATV19580 001-3302 48.00 Total : 48.0019580 79758 11/12/2015 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 5014245 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/OCT1503432 105-2601-4309 253.12 REBAR/LOT D5023788 001-8665-4201 179.85 COMM CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES6143345 001-4601-4305 60.52 THERMOSTAT8024451 001-4204-4309 288.87 Total : 782.3603432 79759 11/12/2015 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS IN-000567918 OFFICE SUPPLIES/OCT1516742 001-1121-4305 48.22 Total : 48.2216742 79760 11/12/2015 IPS GROUP INC 13994 SMART METER TRANSACTION/MGMT FEES/SEP1519314 001-3302-4201 5,635.28 11/12/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 3:06:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 5,635.28 79760 11/12/2015 IPS GROUP INC19314 79761 11/12/2015 IRON MOUNTAIN OFF-SITE DATA LYJ9494 OFF-SITE STORAGE/NOV1506100 001-1121-4201 159.00 Total : 159.0006100 79762 11/12/2015 KAIN, ROBERTA PO 7875 2015 ASSESSMENT TAX REBATE18072 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.6118072 79763 11/12/2015 KING, ANGELA 2000424.003 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND19579 001-2111 257.00 Total : 257.0019579 79764 11/12/2015 L.A. COUNTY METROPOLITAN 800061903 TAP BUS CARD SALES/SEP1500843 145-3403-4251 266.00 Total : 266.0000843 79765 11/12/2015 LA SUPERIOR COURT - TORRANCE PO 7608 CITATION SURCHARGES/AUG1500118 001-3302 60,209.40 CITATION SURCHARGES/SEP15PO 7790 001-3302 58,002.50 Total : 118,211.9000118 79766 11/12/2015 LEARNED LUMBER B479269 COMM CTR GARAGE/SINKERS/HAMMER00167 715-4204-4201 60.87 COMM CTR GARAGE/LUMBERB479459 715-4204-4201 150.31 Total : 211.1800167 79767 11/12/2015 LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS, INC 1114400-20151031 INFORMATION SERVICES/OCT1512482 001-2101-4201 62.00 Total : 62.0012482 79768 11/12/2015 LILY PAD FLORAL DESIGN INC 1763 FLOWERS/SURF LEGENDS UNVEILING10655 001-4601-4308 392.40 Total : 392.4010655 79769 11/12/2015 LOMITA FEED INC 8694 HORSE FEED19396 170-2116-4201 300.00 11/12/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 3:06:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 300.00 79769 11/12/2015 LOMITA FEED INC19396 79770 11/12/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 802305124001 OFFICE SUPPLIES/OCT1513114 001-2201-4305 55.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES/OCT15802399316001 001-2101-4305 207.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES/OCT15802536876001 001-2201-4305 56.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES/OCT15802537099001 001-2201-4305 30.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES/OCT15802667553001 001-3302-4305 353.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES/OCT15802798155001 001-4202-4305 93.60 Total : 797.1513114 79771 11/12/2015 OVERPAYMENT RECOVERY Claim#2015098G15236 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT OVERPAYMENT16607 001-3840 86.60 Total : 86.6016607 79772 11/12/2015 PAPA, SHARON PO 7891/TR 464 TRAVEL REIMB/INT'L ASSOC POLICE CHIEFS18333 001-2101-4317 165.00 Total : 165.0018333 79773 11/12/2015 PAYPAL INC 45146003 CREDIT PROCESSING - PRKG METERS/OCT1516650 001-3302-4201 162.83 001-3305-4201 389.89 001-3304-4201 312.92 001-3302-4201 671.92 Total : 1,537.5616650 79774 11/12/2015 PEP BOYS 08141036984 AUTO SUPPLIES/OCT1500608 715-2101-4311 164.85 AUTO SUPPLIES/OCT1508141036985 715-2101-4311 -179.85 AUTO SUPPLIES/OCT1508141037417 715-2201-4311 140.54 Total : 125.5400608 79775 11/12/2015 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 40971482 MATS & SHOP TOWELS17676 11/12/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 3:06:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79775 11/12/2015 (Continued)PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY17676 001-2201-4309 27.18 MATS40971483 001-4204-4309 46.28 MATS40971484 001-3302-4309 29.78 MATS40971485 001-4204-4309 33.68 SHOP TOWELS40971486 715-4206-4309 19.68 UNIFORM RENTAL40971487 001-4202-4314 77.79 MATS40971488 001-2101-4309 33.08 MATS & SHOP TOWELS40971489 001-3104-4309 24.18 UNIFORM RENTAL40974002 001-4202-4314 41.37 Total : 333.0217676 79776 11/12/2015 SIMS WELDING SUPPLY CO INC 12213236 ACETYLENE & OXYGEN00018 001-3104-4309 228.82 Total : 228.8200018 79777 11/12/2015 SMART AND FINAL IRIS COMPANY 3220630102823 SUPPLIES00114 001-4204-4309 62.86 GAS LAMP EXCURSION SUPPLIES3220630103407 001-4601-4308 64.54 PARK PROGRAM SNACKS3220630103818W 001-4601-4308 263.76 COFFE AND CUPS3220630193999 001-1101-4305 30.95 WELLNESS LUNCHEON SUPPLIES3220630194584 001-1201-4305 41.86 JAIL SUPPLIES3220630194893 001-2101-4306 45.03 SUPPLIES3220630196254 001-4204-4309 151.89 SENIOR CENTER SUPPLIES3220630197490 11/12/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 3:06:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79777 11/12/2015 (Continued)SMART AND FINAL IRIS COMPANY00114 001-4601-4308 74.01 OFFICE SUPPLIES3220630197491 001-4601-4305 81.54 JAIL SUPPLIES3220630199406 001-2101-4306 71.54 Total : 887.9800114 79778 11/12/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 2-00-989-6911 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT1500159 105-2601-4303 85.24 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-00-989-7315 105-2601-4303 13,230.71 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-08-629-3669 001-4204-4303 114.02 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-19-024-1604 001-4204-4303 2,645.90 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-20-128-4825 001-3304-4303 1,333.79 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-20-128-5475 001-4204-4303 236.98 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-20-984-6369 105-2601-4303 56.32 ELECTRICAL BILLING/JUL152-23-687-8021 001-3104-4303 32.26 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-23-725-4420 001-4204-4303 5,445.78 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-31-250-3303 001-4204-4303 120.11 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-36-722-1322 105-2601-4303 38.03 ELECTRICAL BILLING/OCT152-37-909-1838 001-4204-4303 28.49 Total : 23,367.6300159 79779 11/12/2015 STERICYCLE 3003188704 MEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL/2ND QTR10412 001-2101-4201 179.55 Total : 179.5510412 79780 11/12/2015 TIME WARNER CABLE 8448 30 030 0049969 PD/CABLE/NOV1515277 11/12/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 3:06:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79780 11/12/2015 (Continued)TIME WARNER CABLE15277 001-2101-4201 56.25 PW/CABLE/INTERNET 11/16/15-12/15/158448 30 030 0088884 001-4202-4201 175.24 Total : 231.4915277 79781 11/12/2015 TORRANCE AUTO PARTS SM# 13 AUTO PARTS/OCT1516735 715-2101-4311 352.47 715-3102-4311 50.63 715-3302-4311 187.30 715-4206-4311 429.10 Total : 1,019.5016735 79782 11/12/2015 TUFF SHED INC Order No. 943462 SO COMM CTR SHED TO REPLACE GARAGE19577 715-4204-4201 14,999.00 Total : 14,999.0019577 79783 11/12/2015 TURKOLU, MELINDA PO 7876 2014 ASSESSMENT TAX REBATE13960 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.6113960 79784 11/12/2015 U.S. ARMOR 5982 BODY ARMOR/RUSHTON09374 001-2101-4314 751.01 Total : 751.0109374 79785 11/12/2015 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 1020150313 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT/OCT1508207 160-3102-4201 67.50 Total : 67.5008207 79786 11/12/2015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 310 318-6379 TELEPHONE CHARGES 10/25/15-11/24/1500015 001-1132-4304 2.89 001-1141-4304 1.39 001-1201-4304 4.21 001-1202-4304 17.73 001-1203-4304 18.02 001-2101-4304 136.02 001-2201-4304 80.19 001-4101-4304 12.18 001-4202-4304 63.96 001-4601-4304 31.25 11/12/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 3:06:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 79786 11/12/2015 (Continued)VERIZON CALIFORNIA00015 001-1204-4304 19.10 001-3302-4304 1.94 715-1206-4304 6.07 001-1208-4304 0.71 001-4201-4304 20.58 001-1121-4304 5.47 CIRCUIT BILLING/NOV15310 UH9-9686 001-2101-4304 161.58 Total : 583.2900015 79787 11/12/2015 WEISS, DENNIS L 3933 CITY LETTERHEAD13494 001-1208-4305 1,177.53 Total : 1,177.5313494 79788 11/12/2015 YOUNGBLOOD, ERVIN L 1897A POLYGRAPH/OCT1519574 001-2101-4201 250.00 Total : 250.0019574 79789 11/12/2015 ZAPPIA LAW FIRM APC, THE 15-08-30 LEGAL, RE: PERSONNEL MATTERS/AUG1516729 001-1203-4201 962.17 Total : 962.1716729 79790 11/12/2015 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 0161529 STREET SIGN MAINT MATERIAL/OCT1501206 001-3104-4309 578.05 STREET SIGN MAINT MATERIAL/OCT150161596 001-3104-4309 198.22 Total : 776.2701206 1558460085 11/10/2015 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 11/12/15 Check Run WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS REIMB/NOV1514691 705-1217-4324 10,337.82 Total : 10,337.8214691 Bank total : 238,185.97 57 Vouchers for bank code :boa 238,185.97Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 57 11/12/2015 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 3:06:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 10 inclusive, of the check register for 11-12-15 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Finance Director Date 11-17-15 Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0823 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Recommended Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items. Attachments: Tentative Future Agenda Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ November 19, 2015 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 24, 2015 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS DECEMBER 8, 2015 @ 6:00 PM CLOSED SESSION: LITIGATION UPDATE DECEMBER 8, 2015 @ 7:00 PM MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER Land Management System: Update Community Development Director Update on Athens Services: Current Services, AB1826 and Pier Plaza Compactor Environmental Analyst PRESENTATIONS SISTER CITY PRESENTATION SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD PRESENTATION OF NEW WEBSITE FOR SOUTH BAY CITIES CONSENT CALENDAR Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of November 18, 2015 Public Works Director Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of October 6, 2015 Community Resources Manager Donations Approval Finance Director 2015 Fiesta Update Community Resources Manager Award of Contract for Land Development Plan Check Services Public Works Director Hermosa Beach Sewer Improvements - Completion Public Works Director Location of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Environmental Analyst Purchase of Solar Bollards for Bicycle Mini-corrals Environmental Analyst PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:30 PM Oversized Vehicle Ordinance Community Services Manager MUNICIPAL MATTERS City Council Meeting Schedule for 2016 City Manager South Park Donation Program Community Resources Manager Minutes Discussion Update City Clerk Funding Agreement between the County of Los Angeles and the City of Hermosa Beach for the Hermosa Beach Library Community Needs Assessment Community Resources Manager MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL City Council Committee Assignments – September 2015 (Continued from meeting of September 24, 2015) City Clerk DECEMBER 22, 2015 – NO MEETING 2 JANUARY 8-9, 2016 @ 8:00 AM 2016 STRATEGIC PLANNING JANUARY 12, 2016 @ 6:00 PM STUDY SESSION: DOWNTOWN CORE REVITALIZATION STRATEGY - PARKING JANUARY 12, 2016 @ 7:00 PM CONSENT CALENDAR Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of December 1, 2015 Community Resources Manager Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Emergency Preparedness Advisory Commission meeting of November 2, 2015 Interim Fire Chief MUNICIPAL MATTERS Initial discussion of reviewing the Municipal Code to clarify the definition of short-term rentals and enhance the City’s ability to enforce violations - 2 Councilmembers, Initial Report Community Development Director Review of current practices and the Municipal code to enhance the City’s ability to enforce permits related to using of city property (beach, parks, and other facilities) for training classes – 3 Councilmembers, Detailed Report Community Resources Manager Polystyrene Use Update Community Development Director / Environmental Analyst Introduction of Hermosa Beach Social Host Ordinance Police Chief Updating the City Street Signs as presented by Graphic Solutions to give Hermosa Beach a new updated look and discussion of entry signs on Herondo – 3 Councilmembers, Detailed Report Public Works Director Text Amendment to implement the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy by modifying the Parking Ordinance to allow the use of a parking credit for conversion of a non-restaurant use to a restaurant use for commercial spaces smaller than 5,000 square feet, on a case-by-case basis Community Development Director Text Amendment to implement the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy by modifying the Parking Ordinance to facilitate the addition of a limited (200 square feet) outdoor dining area for food service establishments within Pier Plaza that serve no alcohol and operate between the hours of 7am and 10pm Community Development Director Downtown Cost/Benefit Finance Analysis Finance Director JANUARY 26, 2016 @ 6:00 PM CLOSED SESSION OR STUDY SESSION JANUARY 26, 2016 @ 7:00 PM CONSENT CALENDAR Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of January 19, 2016 Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARINGS - 7:30 PM Amend the Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 5.76 (Tobacco Retailers) Requiring Licensure of Tobacco Retailers to Reduce the Illegal Sale of Tobacco Products to Minors, Amending Chapter 8.40 to Expand the Definition of Tobacco Products to Include Electronic Cigarettes and Flavored Tobacco, and Making Violations of Chapter 5.76 Subject to Administrative Penalty Procedures (Continued from meeting of August 25, 2015) Community Development Director MUNICIPAL MATTERS Downtown Enforcement Unit: Update and Cameras Police Chief Communication Plan Update Public Information Officer Farmer’s Market Contract Update Community Resources Manager Project Touch Lease Discussion Community Resources Manager HAF Sponsorship Discussion Community Resources Manager Approval of Special Event Policy Community Resources Manager A request from AT&T for authorization to apply for a Conditional Use Permit to relocate a wireless facility from 29th Court on to City property within Valley Park, and direct City Attorney to initiate lease negotiations for use of the site Community Development Director Smoking Ordinance Enforcement Update Community Development Director 3 PENDING ITEMS Consideration of reduction of business license fee request from Carol G. Weiss, Ph.D.Finance Director Ethics Policy City Manager & Finance Director Food Trucks – Policy Discussion Community Development Director PCH/Aviation Project Update (Including Aesthetic Signage)Public Works Director Hope Chapel Development City Manager/Economic Dev Officer Business Improvement District (BID) for Pier Plaza – Assist in BID Proposal Economic Development Officer Additional Bike Paths Discussion Public Works Director Award Construction Contract for CIP 13-655 City Facilities ADA Improvements Public Works Director Cooperative Agreement with CalTrans (Continued from meeting of April 14, 2015)Public Works Director Community Risk Analysis Fire Chief 11th Street Hotel Community Development Director Council Chambers: City Logo and Name on Council Chambers Wall Dais Layout AV Podium for presentations City Manager / Public Works Director Update Personnel Policies Human Resources Manager Long-term Reduced/Free Daytime Parking Program & Possible Chamber Marketing Plan - Council Discussion/Direction (Only after Council direction regarding Phase 2 purchases) Management Analyst 2015/16 Economic Development Plan Update Economic Development Officer Approval of Changes to the Classification Specification for Youth Program Coordinator Human Resources Manager Update on Use of Community Dialogue Decision Making Tool City Manager Phase 3 Recommendation for Purchase - Council Discussion/Direction (Upgrades of remaining citywide coin meters) Management Analyst Policy on procedure for voting on Boards/Commissions Applicants City Clerk National Citizen Survey Overview Human Resources Manager Speed Signs Survey Public Works Director Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0832 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 MEMORANDUM REGARDING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS CITY TREASURER’S AND CASH BALANCE REPORT OCTOBER 2015 (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the memorandum regarding financial reports. Summary: The October 2015 Revenue and Expenditure Reports, the City Treasurer’s and Cash Balance Report are not available at this time; reports will be provided as soon as they are available. Respectfully Submitted by: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Karen Nowicki, City Treasurer Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0828 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Recommended Action: To approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. Summary: Please ratify the following request for cancellation of the check(s) listed below: #77615 - 04/23/15 - $304.50 - Mark Williams The check was not needed. The check was voided. #79448 - 10/15/15 - $499.00 - APWA Southern CA Chapter The class was missed. The check was voided. Respectfully Submitted by: Karen Nowicki, City Treasurer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Concur: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0821 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 MEMORANDUM REGARDING PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the memorandum regarding Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda Items. Summary: Due to the cancellation of the December Planning Commission meeting, there is no tentative future agenda. The next Regular Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for January 19, 2016 and the tentative future agenda will be provided at the December 8, 2015 City Council meeting. Respectfully Submitted by: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0822 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 ACTION SHEET OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 17, 2015 Recommended Action: To receive and file the action sheet of the Planning Commission meeting of November 17, 2015. Attachments: Action Sheet of November 17, 2015 Approved:Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0830 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 CONSENT TO USE MUNICIPAL PARKING STRUCTURE FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH MURAL PROJECT (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: Authorize the Hermosa Beach Murals Project to install a mural on the south and west sides of the Municipal Parking Structure. Background: This will be the 6th mural for the Murals Project, and will incorporate a historic and current day volleyball theme into large frames. The project will also require a Planning Commission review to confirm the mural images are not a sign, and temporary encroachment permits for the installation. Attachments: 1. Email from Hermosa Beach Mural Project. Respectfully Submitted by: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ From:mike flaherty [mailto:mikeflaherty2010@gmail.com] Sent:Thursday, November 05, 2015 1:45 PM To:Tom Bakaly Cc:Chuck Sheldon; George Schmeltzer; Hoffman, Peter; John Horger; Dick Mc Curdy; Stephen Izant; Maureen Ferguson Lewis; Mike Flaherty Subject:Fwd: Approval of City wall on parking structure Tom, just a follow up on our phone conversation yesterday regarding our proposed 6th mural. As I indicated, there are some changes from Chuck Sheldon's email dated Sept 17th (attached) The theme will remain the same....... Volleyball We are requesting to use the walls at the South / West corners of the City Parking Structure at 13th and Beach Drive. The application of the mural (s) will be somewhat different than the previous mural installations. We will be installing large"frames" to the exterior walls and then applying black / white and color pictures of volleyball events and players , to the "frames". The pictures will represent both historical and present day volleyball in Hermosa Beach. We will do the installation in early spring , with an unveiling event to follow. We will apply to the appropriate City Departments for permits and inspections as required. We would appreciate you getting this item to the City Council for approval at your earliest convenience. If needed , the Murals Committee would be glad to answer any further questions. Thanks, Mike Flaherty Hermosa Beach Murals Project 310 6217687 or mikeflaherty2010@gmail.com Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0816 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 PROJECT STATUS REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2015 (Public Works Director Andrew Brozyna) Recommended Action: To receive and file the Project Status Report as of October 31, 2015. Attachments: Project Status Report as of October 31, 2015 Respectfully Submitted by: Andrew Brozyna, Public Works Director Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Project Status Report Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Actual Completion Date Current Project Budget Project Manager Comments Street and Highway Improvements Major CIP 14-128 Street Improvements - Various Locations - Slurry 12/01/14 10/30/15 $749,468.00 Lucho Rodriguez / Brian Elkins Project reduced to $ 252,000 Scope of Work for slurry seal only Description: Pavement rehabilitation of streets at various locations per the Pavement Management Program Report. Design Phase 12/01/14 05/20/15 Construction Bid and Award Phase 04/30/15 07/21/15 Field work complete. Staff to file Notice of Completion. Construction Phase -slurry seal 10/12/15 10/30/15 Major CIP 15-129 Street Improvements - Various Locations _ Grind and Overlay 09/01/15 03/20/16 $1,391,628.00 Lucho Rodriguez/Brian Elkins Description: Pavement rehabilitation of streets at various locations per the Pavement Management Program Report. Design Phase 09/01/15 09/28/15 Construction Bid and Award Phase 10/15/15 10/29/15 Construction Phase 12/18/15 03/20/16 CIP 11-141 Gould Avenue Street Improvements 03/30/15 07/30/15 $65,850.00 Lucho Rodriguez Description: Pavement and Sidewalk Rehabilitation in Complete Street format of Gould Avenue/27th Street between Sepulveda Avenue and Manhattan Avenue. Estimated project costs are $1.4 million. This project will be re-visited at budget review. Conceptual Plan 03/30/15 07/30/15 Top CIP 12-143 PCH/Aviation Mobility Improvements 11/01/14 04/01/21 $1,204,715.00 Andrew Brozyna Description: Improvements to PCH and Aviation Blvd to turn them into Complete Streets. Improvement will include gateway signs, medians and sidewalk, street and pedestrian lighting, bus shelters and street furnishings.Estimated project costs are $45 million. Pre-Design Phase 11/01/14 09/01/17 PSR 11/01/14 01/01/15 01/01/15 PAED TBD TBD Design Phase TBD TBD Complete PSR and 60% Design - Phase I TBD TBD Complete 90% Plans - Phase I TBD TBD Begin Construction - Phase I TBD TBD Project Status Report Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Actual Completion Date Current Project Budget Project Manager Comments CIP 12-160 PCH Traffic Improvements 06/16/14 09/15/16 $242,381.00 Andrew Brozyna Description: Improve operational mobility on PCH (State Route 1) between Anita Street and Artesia Blvd., includes new striping, median curb extensions and revised signal timing. Design Phase (estimated completion date)06/16/14 10/30/15 $88,000.00 Permit Phase 09/29/14 01/04/16 Caltrans is reviewing. Bid Phase 01/05/16 02/16/16 Council Award Date (tentative)02/23/16 02/23/16 Tentative Construction Phase 03/15/16 09/15/16 $216,000.00 Major CIP 14-163 Protective Bollards Along the Strand 01/21/15 03/31/16 $25,000.00 Andrew Brozyna/Joel Ortiz Description: Install bollards at openings to the Strand to prevent errant vehicles from entering. Presentation of delineators to PW Commission 01/21/15 01/21/15 Presentation of delineators to PW Commission 03/18/15 03/18/15 Presentation to City Council 04/14/15 04/28/15 Presentation to Public Works Commission 05/20/15 05/20/15 Presentation to Public Works Commission 09/16/15 09/16/15 Final Presentation to the Public Works Commission 11/18/15 11/18/15 Council Presentation 01/19/16 01/19/16 Construction Phase 02/28/16 03/31/16 Major CIP 14-168 Sharrows 05/20/15 12/17/15 $20,000.00 Andrew Brozyna Description: Installation of sharrows, associated traffic furnishings on Monterey Blvd. and Longfellow Ave. Council Update and Approval 10/13/15 10/13/15 City Council approved bike friendly improvements. Construction 11/17/15 12/17/15 Top CIP 14-173 8th Street Study 12/01/14 05/01/17 $341,931.00 Andrew Brozyna/Homayoun Behboodi Description: Improvements to provide "safe sidewalks, ADA curb access ramps on both sides of 8th Street for residents, improve crosswalks and improve public use. Preliminary Engineering/Design Alternatives 12/01/14 09/04/15 Council Presentaion 10/13/15 10/27/15 Council selected design alternative. Design kick-off on 11/17/15 Design Phase 11/17/15 04/01/16 Final Council Update and Approval (Before Bid)05/10/16 05/10/16 Bid and Award construction Phase 06/01/16 09/13/16 Construction Phase and Approval 10/01/16 05/01/17 Project Status Report Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Actual Completion Date Current Project Budget Project Manager Comments Sewer Improvements CIP 13-401 Sewer Improvements - Various Locations 01/13/14 01/12/16 $269,660.00 Homayoun Behboodi Description: Engineering and Construction of sewer work required to be performed in association with and in advance of streets designated for rehabilitation for FY 13-14. Design Phase 01/13/14 03/03/14 Bid and Award Phase 03/04/14 05/26/14 Construction Phase 05/27/14 10/17/14 $339,981.00 Punch List Items 10/20/14 11/07/14 Additional Work - Herondo Street Reclaimed Water Line Award 12/01/14 12/09/14 Construction for Additional Water Line 03/02/15 05/29/15 $128,828.00 Completed/ closing stage, reviewing billing tickets and invoices Notice of Completion 01/12/16 01/12/16 CIP 14-402 Sewer Improvements - Various Locations 11/17/14 12/08/15 $129,511.00 Andrew Brozyna Description: Engineering and Construction of sewer work required to be performed in association with and in advance of streets designated for rehabilitation for FY 14-15. Design Phase 11/17/14 02/19/15 Bid & Award Phase 02/23/15 03/24/15 Construction Phase 05/18/15 08/15/15 Construction substantially completed. Project Closeout 08/15/15 12/08/15 Project closeout in process. Notice of Completion to City Council in December 2015. CIP 15-403 Sewer Improvements - Various Locations 01/04/16 12/15/16 $5,514,096.00 Lucho Rodriguez Description: Engineering and Construction of sewer work required to be performed in association with and in advance of streets designated for rehabilitation for FY 15-16. Design Phase 01/04/16 06/30/16 Bid & Award Phase 07/04/16 09/06/16 Construction Phase 09/12/16 12/15/16 Project Status Report Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Actual Completion Date Current Project Budget Project Manager Comments Park Improvements Major CIP 14-503 Lawn Bowling Green Complex Lighting 08/13/15 06/01/16 $60,000.00 Joel Ortiz Description: Installation of eight light poles and fixtures at the Lawn Bowling Green Complex. Design Phase 08/27/15 01/15/16 Ongoing - Coordination with consultants, maintenance staff, and designer to enhance lighting scheme and finalize plans and specifications. Bid & Award Phase 02/01/16 03/01/16 Construction Phase 04/01/16 06/01/16 Major CIP 11-537 South Park Playground Improvement 11/12/13 12/15/15 $859,196.00 Lucho Rodriguez Description: Demolition of existing skate park and construction of a natural playground for 2-5 year olds and a 6-12 year old play area. Project under construction 95% complete. Project will be completed by Mid-December. Design Phase 11/12/13 09/26/14 Bid Phase 01/08/15 02/18/15 Award 03/10/15 03/10/15 Construction Phase 04/06/15 12/15/15 CIP 13-538 Citywide Park Master Plan 07/04/15 02/14/16 $143,853.00 Homayoun Behboodi Description: Update the City's 1990 Park Master Plan. RFP Phase 07/04/15 02/14/16 RFP in progress Major CIP 14-539 Valley Park Playground Surface Renovation 11/03/14 11/19/15 $25,265.00 Joel Ortiz Description: Resurface existing poured rubber playground surface at Valley Park protecting the surface from UV Rays, cracks and granulation. Preliminary Phase 11/03/14 10/01/15 Award 10/01/15 11/03/15 Robertson Industries provided the lowest reasonable quote, necessary documentation was provided and a purchase order processed. Construction 11/15/15 11/19/15 Major CIP 14-541 Clark Field Energy Efficient Electrical Upgrades - Phase II 01/19/15 12/31/15 $214,000.00 Lucho Rodriguez Consultant determined that existing poles are structurally sound. Description: Upgrade the existing poles and field lighting to increase efficiency. Construction Phase 02/23/15 12/31/15 Project Status Report Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Actual Completion Date Current Project Budget Project Manager Comments Public Building and Ground Improvements Major CIP 13-656 Citywide Energy Efficiency Upgrades - Phase I 04/10/14 12/31/15 $723,907.80 Lucho Rodriguez Description: Conduct energy audits for all City facilities and assess areas where the City can reduce electricity and natural gas and increase efficiency of these facilities. Phase I: Consists of upgrading the lighting systems at multiple sites, including: Building Interior, Building Exterior, City-owned Street Lights and Park Lights. Construction in progress 70% completed. Phase I: Design Phase & SCE Application Process 04/10/14 09/30/14 Phase I: Bid and Award Phase 09/11/14 10/14/14 Phase I: Construction Phase 02/23/15 12/31/15 Top CIP 12-609 Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation 07/15/15 06/30/17 $258,207 Homayoun Behboodi Description: Downtown Core revitalization Strategy (Hermosa Ave, Pier Plaza and Pier Head Streetscape Project). On March 10, 2015 the removal of the granite bollards and relocation of the Jazz plaques was incorporated into this project. Completion of RFP and awarding contract for Hermosa Ave. Design and Conceptual Design of Pier Plaza 07/15/2015 03/22/2016 Reconnaissance and Design 03/23/2016 09/30/2016 Bid & Award Phase - Hermosa Avenue 10/01/2016 12/31/2016 Construction - Hermosa Avenue 01/01/2017 06/30/2017 CIP 13-606 Fire Station Renovation and Upgrades 12/01/15 06/15/16 $10,517.00 Ells Freeman/FD Project Delayed until the completion of the Fire Tower Demolition Description: Upgrade or repair kitchen cabinets, exterior sliding door and apparatus bay door. CIP 15-607 Fire Station Renovation and Upgrades 03/12/15 06/30/16 $209,000.00 Ells Freeman/FD Project Delayed until the completion of the Fire Tower Demolition Description: Upgrades to Fire Station including new interior/exterior paint, replacement of first floor carpet, installation of double pane windows on second floor, reloaction of air compressor in tower into new cabinet, and kitchen cabinets Project Status Report Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Actual Completion Date Current Project Budget Project Manager Comments CIP 14-614 Police Facilities Improvements Description:The project involves creating additional secured storage for property and evidence, consolidation of range and armory equipment, installation of new updated locks on secured doors in the police department, and storage on PD ramp. 06/04/15 06/30/16 $107,972.00 Ells Freeman / PD In-progress: wash down sink installation and shelving. Police lock improvements will be completed in FY 15/16. Construction 06/04/15 06/30/16 Major CIP 15-615 Corporate Yard Facility Description:This overall project which spreads over 5 year period, consists of the construction of a new Corporate Yard Facility to include approximately 50,000 SF of new buildings comprised of Administration, Sewer, Storage, Shops, Fleet Maintenance, and Employee Services. Site improvements will include new material bins, surface parking, and a fueling island. The new facility may potentially be located offsite from the existing yard site. The phase of work budged for FY 2015-16 will include Design of the new Yard and to begin addressing soil contamination (removal or containment). 10/15/15 12/15/16 $50,000.00 Ells Freeman Project includes Toxic Concern Mitigation Review existing plans of City Yard 10/15/15 05/01/16 Hire consultant to review and address environmental conditions 05/01/16 08/01/16 Complete Assessment Report 08/01/16 12/15/16 Major CIP 14-632 Fire Department Tower Demolition 12/01/14 03/31/16 $380,894.00 Andrew Brozyna/Brian Elkins Description: Demolition and removal of the Fire Dept. tower and seismic upgrades to the 2nd floor addition. Complete Historic Review and Alternatives 04/24/12 08/24/15 Design 12/01/14 09/15/15 Finalize Structural Analysis 09/16/15 10/01/15 Council Award Date Construction (tentative)10/27/15 10/27/15 Relocate Police and Fire Staff 10/27/15 12/15/15 Modular buildings delivered on 11/9/15 Construction 12/15/15 03/15/16 Move Staff Back to Police/Fire Building 03/15/16 03/31/16 CIP 15-634 Municipal Solar Facility Plan and Installations 12/01/2015 06/30/16 $50,000.00 Kristy Morris Description: The project is soliciting proposals from solar energy service providers to design, install, finance, own, operate and maintain one or more solar photovoltaic systems at certain municipal facilities under a power purchase agreement or solar lease agreement. The City anticipates purchasing from the provider all of the energy output generated by the systems. Phase 1: RFP process for municipal solar program and financing option; select consultant: FY 15/16; Phase 2: Engineering, permitting, financing and installation of solar projects: FY 15/16 Project Status Report Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Actual Completion Date Current Project Budget Project Manager Comments CIP 13-649 Community Center General Improvements - Phase I and Clark Field Electrical CIP 11-602 09/22/13 12/08/15 $229,529.00 Andrew Brozyna Description: On-going electrical upgrades and repairs to existing electrical systems in the Community Center and Clark Field electrical upgrades Project substantially completed; Notice of Completion to City Council in December 2015 Design Phase 09/22/13 06/11/15 Bid & Award Phase 06/12/14 07/30/14 Council Award Date 08/26/14 08/26/15 Construction Phase 11/01/14 09/22/15 Project Closeout 11/01/14 12/08/15 CIP 13-655 City Facilities ADA Improvements 11/01/14 12/15/15 $146,159.00 Lucho Rodriguez Description: Installation of self-opening doors at the Civic Center and Clark building to comply with ADA guidline. Will upgrade 6 doors to meet ADA Design Phase 11/01/14 03/15/15 Bid and Award Phase 07/16/15 08/16/16 Re-Bid and Award Phase 08/20/15 09/22/15 Bid 3rd time 09/03/15 09/17/15 Council Award 10/13/15 10/13/15 Construction Phase 11/15/15 12/15/15 Major CIP 10-661 Surfing Memorial Statue 11/10/14 11/14/15 $275,208.00 Andrew Brozyna Description: Installation of a surf legends memorial bronze statue in front of the Community Center. Committee Review & Commitment to Design 11/05/14 08/28/15 Design 11/10/14 03/12/15 Council Award PSA & Trust agreement 11/05/14 11/05/14 Bid & Award Construction 04/06/15 04/23/15 Council Construction Award date 05/12/15 05/12/15 Construction Phase 06/08/15 10/30/15 Ribbon Cutting/Complete 11/14/15 11/14/15 Project in Close Out. Top CIP 13-664 Comprehensive City Facilities Master Plan 06/17/15 11/30/15 $100,000.00 Andrew Brozyna Description: Assess the condition of city facilities, Seismic evaluation, asbestos/lead survey, ADA compliance/transition plan, space needs study and equipment conditions/upgrades. Conduct review and evaluation of facilities and prepare reports 06/17/15 09/15/15 Project study substantially completed. Project Close-Out 10/05/15 11/30/15 Presentation to City Council scheduled for February. CIP 15-650 Community Center General Improvements - Phase III 11/01/15 05/15/16 $50,000.00 Joel Ortiz/Ells Freeman Description: On-going improvements to the Community Center including, Repairs to windows, doors and minor architectural. Preliminary Phase 11/01/15 02/20/15 Ongoing - Determining full scope of work Award 02/23/16 02/23/16 Construction 03/15/16 05/15/16 Project Status Report Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Actual Completion Date Current Project Budget Project Manager Comments CIP 15-657 City Right of Way ADA Improvements 09/01/15 03/20/16 238,000.00$ Joel Ortiz Description: The City Facilities ADA Improvements consists of removal and replacement non-compliant street curb ramps or sidewalk where no curb ramps exist and constructing new ramps to be in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Citywide Right of Way ADA Inventory Study will be included in the CIP13-664 City Facility Condition Assessment and Asbestos Report. Curb ramps improvements are to be constructed with the Street Improvements Project (CIP 15-129). Design 09/01/15 09/28/15 Bid & Award 10/15/15 10/29/15 Construction 12/18/15 03/20/16 CIP 15-660 Municipal Pier Structural Repairs - Phase III 03/15/16 06/15/16 343,393.00$ Joel Ortiz Phase I was completed in May 2013. Phase II was completed in May 2015. Phase III will involve the replacement of existing conduit, junction boxes, connections and wiring so that the lights can be functional. The project will also eliminate the service box towards the end of the pier and create a new service connection point for the foghorn at the end of the pier. Funds remaining from FY 14/15 will be combined with this project. Scoping of project in process to prepare RFP for design. Prepare RFP 03/15/16 06/15/16 Major CIP 15-667 Community Center, Plaza, and Park Improvements 11/02/15 06/30/16 69,688.00$ Ells Freeman Description: Relocation of Jazz and Surfer's Walk of Fame plaques and creation of a cultural monument - $15K; Modification of existing fencing and installation of additional fencing at the Community Center to prevent homeless encampment around the building - $12,459; Replacement of the marquee for the Community Theatre. The existing marquee name "Hermosa Beach Playhouse" would be changed to the official name of the Theatre - $19,348; Replacement of wood floors with vinyl tiles in Room 7, which hosts the After School and After Camp Programs - $7,976; Replacement of the wood floor with vinyl tiles in Room 12, which currently acts as the Community Theatre's Dressing Room - $5,789; Replace two water fountains, one at Sea View Park and one at Fort Lots-O-Fun Park - $4,620; Replace the water fountain at Jarvis Memorial Park with bottle filler type water fountain - $4,496 Plaza and Theater improvements that are part of this CIP are deemed major priority. Permanent fencing was installed 10/4/15 to address the homeless encampment issue. The water fountain at Jarvis Memorial has been installed. Water fountains have been received and scheduling of installation in progress. Project Status Report Priority Project Name Start Date Estimated End Date Actual Completion Date Current Project Budget Project Manager Comments Non-CIP Projects EV Charging Stations - Establish Parking and Fees 04/01/14 11/30/15 Kristy Morris Mini-Bike Corrals/Bike Racks 03/01/15 01/31/16 20,000.00$ Kristy Morris/Ells Freeman Bike racks have been purchased. Several bike racks have been installed along the Strand wall. PW will schedule the installation of additional bike racks after receiving direction from the PW Commission on 11/18/15. Two bike racks for electric bikes have been installed at City Hall. Sea Level Rise Grant 07/01/14 03/31/16 50,000.00$ Kristy Morris Project extended. Pavement Management Program - FY 15/16 01/15/16 08/15/16 Lucho Rodriguez Replace Ceiling Tiles - Police and Fire Departments 11/15/15 02/15/16 10,420.00$ Ells Freeman On-hold pending completion Fire Tower Demo Paint Fire Department 02/01/16 05/01/16 15,000.00$ Ells Freeman On-hold pending completion Fire Tower Demo Civic Center Upkeep On-going On-Going 275,485.00$ Ells Freeman 1st Floor Conference Room painting completed. Major Sewer Hydrojet Contract 08/01/15 10/27/15 126,885.00$ Ells Freeman Contract was awarded on 10/27/15. Videotaping of lines to be completed by March 2016 Major String Lights on Pier Plaza 11/04/15 02/28/15 7,000.00$ Ells Freeman Lights are on order. Major Stormwater Management Program and Funding Mechanism On-going On-Going 65,000.00$ Andrew Brozyna/Homayoun Behboodi/Kristy Morris CNG Fueling Options Report 10/01/15 01/12/16 -$ Andrew Brozyna/Ells Freeman/Kristy Morris PW met with the City of Redondo Beach regarding the sharing of CNG facilities and the City. Due to the aging condition of the existing facilities sharing is not possible. Vehicle Replacement: Update Report 07/01/15 02/01/16 -$ Andrew Brozyna/Ells Freeman/Kristy Morris Major Parking Counting System - Signage 01/01/15 11/20/15 11,020.00$ Joel Ortiz Project 95% complete. Document Scanning and Imaging 07/15/15 On-Going 17,216.00$ Homayoun Behboodi Condtion Assessment of 10 Sewer Lines 08/01/15 04/30/15 5,000.00$ Ells Freeman Street Striping 11/20/15 02/28/15 15,000.00$ Ells Freeman City Council Chambers Audio/Visual Improvements 07/01/15 04/30/16 163,780.00$ Homayoun Behboodi Includes Upgrading AV System for Council Chamber PS & E 07/01/15 11/19/15 Installation 01/08/16 04/30/16 Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0818 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 REVIEW OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW A 30,250+ SQUARE FOOT HOTEL WITH 30 ROOMS AND COMMON AREAS ON AN UNDEVELOPED 11,516+ SQUARE FOOT LOT AT 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE; (2) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON-SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL (MINI-BARS) IN GUEST ROOMS; (3) PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW A VALET PROGRAM AND PARKING IN TANDEM ON-SITE, AND ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN. (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: To sustain the Planning Commission approval of the Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan, and Conditional Use Permit by adopting the attached resolution and adopting an environmental Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan. Project Information: ZONING:C-2 Restricted Commercial GENERAL PLAN:CR Commercial Recreation LOT SIZE:11,516 sq. ft. FLOOR AREA:30,250 sq. ft. HOTEL ROOMS:30 Guest Rooms COMMON AREAS:2,950 sq. ft. CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED:On-sale general alcohol in hotel guest rooms PARKING REQUIRED:30 spaces PARKING PROPOSED:37 spaces ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:Mitigated Negative Declaration Background: At the meeting of October 27, 2015, Councilmembers Fangary and Petty, pursuant to Section 2.52 of the Municipal Code, brought the decision of the Planning Commission up for review. Pursuant to HBMC section 17.56.110, a decision on this matter requires the affirmative vote of three Councilmembers. Further, HBMC section 2.52 requires action by resolution; under Government Code section 36936, a Council resolution requires three votes for adoption. If an intended action by the Council is not supported by three votes, the Planning Commission decision will stand. Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0818 The Planning Commission, at its meeting of October 20, 2015, approved the applicant’s request for a Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan, and Conditional Use Permit for a 30-room hotel at 1429 Hermosa Avenue. The Planning Commission report and attachments can be found here: <http://hermosabeach.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=6&clip_id=3992&meta_id=235232> The project was originally approved in 2013 by the Planning Commission. It was also approved, on appeal, by the City Council but revisions and additional conditions were incorporated. However, as the entitlements recently expired, the applicant has now applied for the same entitlements for an almost identical project. Proposed minor changes in the current project include the “guest breakfast area” on the first floor, relocation of bicycle racks, and specification of the size and height of elevator housing on the rooftop (which complies with the height limit for elevator towers). Also, since the Planning Commission hearing, the applicant has modified exterior finishes and the proposed name for the hotel, as reflected in the attached rendering. These changes to the plans do not alter the building footprint or square footage, and the project is otherwise consistent with the plans approved in 2013. The applicant has already received a Coastal Development Permit for the project based on the City’s 2013 project approval. When the project was approved in 2013, standard conditions were included granting the applicant two years from the final approval date to either commence the project or file for an extension to the Planning Commission to avoid expiration of the entitlements. The applicant failed to do either, thus he was forced to file this new application when the entitlements expired. Staff notes that the project was delayed due to the Coastal Commission permit process, revisions to the project that required City review, and the applicant’s delay in filing of the plan check submittal and other resubmittals. The project was in the final stages of plan check review when the entitlements expired. Below is a rough timeline of the process: City Council Approval of entitlements:7/23/2013 Coastal Commission permit issuance:7/11/2014 Initial Plan check submittal 10/30/14 1st review of corrections issued:11/25/14 Plans resubmitted for Building Review:1/5/15 2nd review of corrections issued:1/15/15 Plans resubmitted to City 4/24/15 3rd review of corrections issued:5/5/15 Plans resubmitted for City:6/12/15 Building & Safety Plan Check Approved:6/15/15 Sent for internal Planning and Building & Safety final plan check:6/24/15 *Internal Zoning and Building & Safety review required after outside Building & Safety review completed. Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0818 Analysis: Please refer to the Planning Commission report and full analysis which can be found here: <http://hermosabeach.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=6&clip_id=3992&meta_id=235232N> Additionally, the Commission considered that regulatory requirements relevant to the project have not changed since 2013, and conditions in the vicinity have not significantly changed. The Environmental Negative Declaration related to traffic impacts does rely on traffic analysis from the 2013 Traffic Impact Study used when the project was first submitted to the City Council. However, the City’s Traffic Engineer has confirmed that the 2013 traffic impact study continues to be valid and does not need to be updated as the project has not materially changed, nor have their been significant changes to background traffic conditions or cumulative impacts from new or anticipated projects since the study was conducted in 2013. In summary, the project is essentially the same as the project approved in 2013 and there have been no changes to the zoning for the site or to development standards. Therefore the Commission found the project to be consistent with current codes and the criteria for approval of the subject entitlements and made the necessary findings for approval. Attachments: 1. Proposed resolution sustaining the Planning Commission’s decision 2. Planning Commission Staff Report from October 20, 2015 3. Legal Posting 4. Applicant’s Submittal: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project Final TI’s 5. Applicant’s Submittal: Project Plans (all pages) 6. 1429 Hermosa Ave Exterior Rendering 11-18-15 Respectfully Submitted by: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ 1 Attachment 1 CC RESOLUTION NO. 15-X A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW A 30,250+ SQUARE FOOT HOTEL WITH 30 GUEST ROOMS AND COMMON AREAS ON AN UNDEVELOPED 11,516+ SQUARE FOOT LOT; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON-SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL FOR HOTEL GUESTS IN GUEST ROOMS RESTRICTED TO MINI-BARS; A PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW A VALET PROGRAM AND PARKING IN TANDEM; AND ADOPTION OF MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN, AT 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 15 THRU 18 BLOCK 15, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. Section 1.. An application was filed by Hermosa Beach Parking Company, LLC seeking approval for a Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan, and Conditional Use Permit to allow a 30,250± square foot 30-room hotel with parking in tandem and on-sale general alcohol in guest rooms of the hotel at 1429 Hermosa Avenue. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for the Precise Development Plan 15-11, Parking Plan 15-7, and Conditional Use Permit 15- 10 on October 20, 2015, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission, and it approved the project. Section 3.The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider Precise Development Plan 15-11, Parking Plan 15-7, and Conditional Use Permit 15-10 on November 24, 2015, at which time the Staff Report and testimony and evidence, both written and oral, and the record of the decision of the Planning Commission was presented to and considered by the City Council. Section 4.Based on the Staff Report, testimony and evidence received, both oral and written, the City Council makes the following findings: 1. A Precise Development Plan is proposed to construct a three-story 30, 250± square foot hotel with 30 guest rooms, and other common areas on a vacant lot at 1429 Hermosa Avenue. The ground level consists of a parking garage with 37 parking spaces, the front desk and lobby, a commercial kitchen, and a food service area for use by hotel guests only. The second level consists of 15 hotel rooms, restroom, and a multi-function room of approximately 336 square feet that can be used for activities for hotel guests only. The third level consists of 15 hotel rooms, fitness room, and an open air patio/spa/sitting room of approximately 600 square feet at the northeast corner of the building that can be used by hotel guests only. The use of all facilities is restricted to hotel guests only to reduce impacts to the surrounding area such as noise, disturbances overconcentration of alcoholic beverage service, and reduced parking availability; these restrictions are appropriate and will reduce impacts to the surrounding area and parking supply. 2. A Conditional Use Permit is proposed to allow on-sale general alcohol in the guest rooms (mini- bars). 2 3. A Parking Plan is proposed to allow a valet parking program, tandem parking, and exclusion of common areas from parking requirements. The proposed project contains 37 onsite spaces on the ground level, 24 of which are tandem, nine (9) of which are standard orientation and four (4) of which are located in the drive aisle. 4. The project site is a vacant C-2 zoned property located on Hermosa Avenue between 15 th Street and 15th Court on the northerly edge of the downtown area. Hotel operations are permitted by right in the C-2 zone. The property is designated Commercial Recreation (CR) in the General Plan and Coastal Land Use Plan. A payment of one in-lieu parking fee to offset loss of one on- street parking meter on 15th Street is appropriate. Section 5. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the following findings for a Precise Development Plan pursuant to H.B.M.C. Section 17.58.030: A. Distance from existing residential uses in relation to negative effects: Surrounding the project site are commercial and multi-family uses north of 15th Street and south of 15th Court (C-2), an apartment building to the immediate west (R-3), and multi-family north of 15th Street (R-3) and east of Hermosa Avenue (R-3). Some residential uses on the south side of 15th Court, zoned C-2, are legal nonconforming. Compatibility with surrounding residential properties is discussed below. Lighting: The project is located within a developed urban area currently subject to the effect of night-lighting. Recessed linear LED lights proposed on the south side of the building and a backlit sign are located directly across from commercial and residential uses. While the site is located on a well-lighted commercial street, wall mounted luminaires may create a glow that is obtrusive to residences to the south, north and west. To reduce fugitive light and glow and their effects on nearby uses, exterior lighting is conditioned so that architectural lighting on the building façade and elevations shall not utilize tube-type lighting, however, low intensity lighting projected onto the building may be used. In addition, conditions restrict lighting on the south, north, and west sides of the building across from residential. To reduce the effect of headlamps in the parking area, a condition is included directing the valet service to turn off headlamps when vehicles are parked in the queuing lane. On this basis impacts relating to lighting are not significant. Traffic, Circulation and Parking: The route of travel will maintain previous patterns prior to termination of prior commercial use. Onsite parking for the project will be accessed via a two-way driveway with 25 foot wide encroachments on 15th Street and 15th Court. Residential uses are located north and south of the driveway encroachment and the apartment building to the west is adjacent to the parking area. The proposed use is a low traffic generator. Minimal service/delivery vehicles will be required as the business is not involved in high turnover commodities. Vehicles will enter primarily via 15th Street and exit primarily via 15th Court. Adequate parking for the use is provided, to mitigate the loss of one metered on street park space an in-lieu shall be required, measures to ensure smooth local circulation patterns are made conditions of the project, and a valet management program will be used. Deliveries will occur in the early morning generally before 9:00 a.m. where on street parking on Hermosa Avenue should be available. The project is conditioned to reduce impacts associated with glare from headlamps. Appropriate conditions are applied to reduce impacts as discussed below. Noise and disturbances: 3 The primary use is a hotel with onsite facilities for use by hotel guests only. While use of general alcohol, , may result in adverse impacts such as noise and disturbances to the surrounding area, which exhibits an overconcentration of alcoholic beverage establishments alcohol is limited to min-bars in guest rooms. and the project is conditioned to reduce any noise or disturbance impacts as further discussed under Section 6 (Conditional Use Permit). Construction noise will not cause significant impacts with compliance with the Noise Ordinance and as indicated under Item G. B. The relationship of the estimated generated traffic volume and the capacity and safety of streets serving the area: The project fronts Hermosa Avenue, which provides the primary north-south circulation through downtown. Driveway encroachments on 15th Street and 15th Court are proposed to provide 2-way access to the site. 15th Court terminates at Noble Park and 15th Street terminates at the Strand. The Traffic Impact Study prepared by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan Engineers was reviewed by the City’s Traffic Engineer and found to be appropriate. Based on Traffic Impact Study findings the levels of service at most of the eight (8) study intersections throughout the City would not change, or result in only incremental change that would not be significant, and all intersections would remain at LOS C or better. While the impacts are not significant, recommendations of the Study are incorporated as project conditions to facilitate access, with the exception of a recommendation to direct vendors to utilize the designated on street meter parking space(s) along the Hermosa Avenue property frontage to limit potential conflicts between service/delivery vehicles and pedestrians and bicyclists. While the Study suggests modifying two on-street meter spaces on Hermosa Avenue to be used by service/delivery vehicles with signage stating, “No Parking Except Trucks” for identified service and delivery times, the project is alternatively conditioned to direct service and deliveries to off-peak hours before 9:00 a.m. when metered spaces are generally available. Pedestrian/bicycle accommodations maintain the existing vibrant pedestrian environment around the site including a pedestrian oriented façade with entrance from the sidewalk and bicycle rack at the corner of 15th Court and Hermosa Avenue to encourage bicycling and the project is conditioned to supply bike parking for a minimum of 10 bikes in an accessible location, excluding the five foot rear setback. C. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking in relation to actual need: The Traffic Impact Study prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan finds that 30 proposed onsite parking spaces will be adequate for all parking demands of the hotel. The applicant amended plans to provide 33 spaces plus 4 spaces in the drive aisle. D. The combination of uses proposed, as they relate to compatibility: The primary use is a hotel with onsite facilities for use by hotel guests. The provision of hotel facilities for the convenience and enjoyment of hotel guests is typical and compatible. General alcohol may be offered in guest rooms (mini-bars) and on that basis alcohol will be incidental to hotel operations, and the hotel will not operate a bar, restaurant or nightclub. Limiting use of common facilities and multi-purpose rooms to a low occupancy (20 persons per area or less if restricted by code) and to a 10:00 p.m. cutoff ensures guests will not be disturbed in the late evening and the activities will not morph into a more intensive use. As conditioned, the proposed combination of uses do not pose compatibility concerns with the primary hotel use. E. The proposed exterior signs and décor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area:Pursuant to Section 17.26.050 regulating development in C-2 zones, the building will conform to the 30 foot height limit, a five foot setback is provided along the rear yard since the project site abuts a residentially zoned property with an apartment complex, and this setback will be landscaped and provided with an automatic watering system. Elevator housing and ventilation fans are proposed to exceed the 30 height limit by as much as six (6) feet. Pursuant to Section 17.46.010, 4 these elements are permitted to exceed the height limit in commercial zones by no more than eight (8) feet as long as they occupy no more than five (5) percent of the roof area. The project is conditioned to ensure the building does not exceed 30 feet in height and the elevator housing and ventilation fans are compliant with height exceptions outlined in Section 17.46.010. Additionally, a 6-foot high painted block wall is proposed along the property line adjacent to the apartment complex to the west, with a gate to limit unauthorized use of the required landscaped area between the property line and the hotel building. Architecture in the surrounding is varied and there is no theme or historic buildings (the closest is the Bijou Building) located in the immediate area. Hotel lighting is conditioned to be compatible and nonintrusive. The project proposes to install canopies over the sidewalk on the south and east sides of the building and landscape within the public right-of-way, requiring an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department. A vertical sign with backlit letters facing Hermosa Avenue is proposed. Section 17.50.130 limits total sign area to two square feet for each foot of lineal building frontage (95 feet x 2= 190 square feet). Signs specifications for have not been submitted. The project is conditioned to require a sign permit in substantial compliance with the conceptual sign proposal per Chapter 17.50 ‘Signs.’ F. Building and driveway orientation in relation to sensitive uses: Impacts relating to residential uses are addressed above and in other sections. There are no other sensitive uses in the surrounding area. G. Noise, Odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use: During the construction phase of the project, noise standards set by the City’s General Plan are not anticipated to be exceeded. The applicant has stated that project construction will take approximately one year. Per compliance with 8.24.050 and 8.24.040(I) noise is not anticipated to be significant. The project is also conditioned to require that construction equipment shall be well maintained and a no idling requirement will be implemented. HVAC systems are conditioned to not create decibel levels higher than 45 decibels at any property line. The main entrance of the hotel faces Hermosa Avenue, a four lane, 100 foot-wide, well-traveled urban collector that will provide a noise buffer between residential properties to the east of the project site. Guest room balconies on the north, south, and west side of the hotel will be monitored by hotel staff to ensure noise is not an issue. H. Impact of the proposed use to the city’s infrastructure, and/or services:The applicant proposes solar panels on the roof to reduce electrical demand. A screened solid waste facility is provided along 15th Court as shown on the submitted plans. Public Works Department recommendations are incorporated as project conditions: Impacts on police services relating to project design are not anticipated. I. Adequacy of mitigation measures to minimize environmental impacts in quantitative terms: No additional impacts are identified. Section 6.Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council makes the following findings for a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to H.B.M.C. Section 17.40.020: A. Distance from existing residential uses: The hotel will not operate a bar, restaurant or nightclub. In- room mini-bars may be provided and this limitation will reduce potential adverse impacts. Potential noise impacts to nearby residences generated by hotel guests who may be returning to the hotel, especially walking from the downtown area are reduced to insignificant levels by standard conditions in 5 Section 17.40.080(A) and requiring hotel staff to regularly monitor the project site in an effort to deter loitering, unruly behavior, or activities that may disturb neighboring residential uses. Closure of the business center/multi-purpose rooms and spa/open air patio/sitting room by 10:00 p.m. will reduce other impacts. Noise and headlamps from vehicles accessing and leaving the hotel in the late evening affecting adjacent residential uses will be minimal as is anticipated that vehicle movements in the late evening would be minimal and the valet service will be required to turn off headlamps when vehicles are parked in the queuing lane. B. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking facilities, and its distance from the proposed use: As discussed under the Parking Plan, parking should be adequate. C. Location of and distance to churches, schools, hospitals and public playgrounds:Such uses are generally daytime uses while hotel activity typically peaks during the evening hours. No impact to churches, schools, and public playgrounds is anticipated. D. The combination of uses proposed: The combination of uses is evaluated under the Precise Development Plan. No concern with the combination of uses was identified or anticipated. E. The number of similar establishments or uses within close proximity to the proposed establishment: The downtown area is home to two other hotels (Grandview Inn, Beach House Inn), a motel (Sea Sprite Motel), and a hostel (Surf City Hostel). The provision of common areas and allowance for alcohol inside rooms via mini-bars makes the proposed hotel unique from the other hotels in the downtown area except for the Beach House Inn which was granted on-sale general alcohol sales in 2001 limited to in-room mini-bars and within private banquet rooms limited to use by hotel guests (including their guests). F. Will the establishment create a concentration of similar outlets in the area: The downtown area houses four lodging establishments. With the variety of existing uses in the downtown area and the geographically distribution of hotels, there is not currently and the hotel will not create a concentration of hotels. G. Precautions taken by the owner or operator of the proposed establishment to assure compatibility of the use with surrounding uses: The applicant proposes to limit hours for use of common facilities to 10:00 p.m. daily. However this resolution further limits alcohol to in-room mini bars only in order to reduce potential late evening activity and its potential disturbances. H. The relationship of proposed business-generated traffic volume and size of streets serving the area: This issue was evaluated under the Precise Development Plan application. The request for a CUP to be allowed to provide general alcohol has no bearing on this factor. I. The proposed exterior signs and décor, and compatibility with existing establishments in the area: No issues relating to the CUP are identified. J. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use:Guest room balconies to the north, south, and west side of the hotel and the spa/open-air patio/sitting room on the third floor face neighboring residential uses and could potentially impact neighboring residential uses. The guest room balconies will be regularly monitored by hotel staff to ensure compliance with City noise standards and compatibility with the surrounding uses. Alcohol provision is limited to in-room minibars thereby ensuring the primary use of the property as a hotel and not as an alcohol serving establishment . 6 K. Impact of the proposed use to the City’s infrastructure, and/or services: Limiting alcohol to in-room mini bars is not anticipated to impact City infrastructure. Impacts to police services have been an issue relating to late night alcohol serving facilities. However, the proposed use is a hotel, without a restaurant, bar or nightclub, and with accessory facilities whose use will cease by 10:00 p.m. Therefore impacts to police services are not anticipated. The project is further conditioned to require monitoring by hotel personnel and remedies should unanticipated activity occur. L. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the city council, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole: No other considerations are identified or needed. Section 7. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the City Council finds that parking supply and management is adequate to meet demand as follows pursuant to H.B.M.C. Section 17.44.210. The project proposes to supply 37 spaces, with 24 spaces in-tandem, 9 standard orientation spaces and 4 spaces located in the drive aisle of the parking garage and 24/7 valet managed parking. Per Section 17.44.030(H) “Off-street Parking-Commercial or Business Uses” hotels require 1 space for each unit for the first 50 units, and hotels with facilities including restaurants, banquet rooms, conference rooms, commercial retail uses and similar activities shall compute parking for the various uses separately. Per the Traffic Impact Study the small scale of the proposed hotel facilities, limited to use by hotel guests only, do not constitute separate use types with additional parking demand, therefore the required parking demand is 30 spaces. The project site lies on the edge of the parking impacted downtown. Three hour parking from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. is generally allowed along both sides of 15th Street, no parking is allowed along 15th Court; 24 hour parking is allowed along 15th Street near the project site with resident parking passes, and 3-hour metered parking from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. is located along Hermosa Avenue. Along with the proposed 30 room hotel the proposed building will have a first floor “breakfast area” and second floor business center to be used by hotel guests only. The guest breakfast area is located on the east side of the first floor facing Hermosa Avenue. A kitchen layout plan provided by the applicant shows a full range, oven, prep area, and a hood adjacent to the buffet area and lounge area on the first floor. The applicant states that the “breakfast area” will be used by hotel guests only and not open to the public. The project is conditioned to require all transactions for food and beverage to be charged to a hotel room so as to reduce the likelihood outside patrons would use the facilities. Additional parking demand because of the food service area designated for hotel guests only is not anticipated. Approval of the Parking Plan allows tandem spaces together with a valet program for a visitor serving use, as well as payment of an in-lieu fee to mitigate the loss of one on-street parking space, is consistent with the following guidance: Coastal Land Use Plan: To recognize the unique parking needs of the pedestrian oriented downtown business area-which are less than a typical commercial area ... (Parking Access Summary, Goals and Objectives #6, page 3.) The City should not allow the elimination of existing on-street parking or off-street parking spaces within the coastal zone... In the pedestrian oriented downtown commercial district alternatives to providing parking to meet increased demands for use should be allowed, to encourage alternative to using motorized vehicles and to encourage improvement and enhancement of visitor serving business activities. (Existing Policies and Programs, 1st policy listed, pages 3 and 4). Section 8. Pursuant the California Environmental Quality Act and CEQA Guidelines and the City's CEQA Guidelines, the following findings are made: 7 1. The Staff Environmental Review Committee prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the proposed project. Based upon the Initial Study, the Committee determined that there was no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the project would have a significant effect on the environment and no mitigation measures were incorporated. 2. A Notice of Completion of a Draft Negative Declaration was circulated to the State Clearinghouse (No. 2013031049) to responsible and trustee agencies and by legal notice for the required 30 day period. The Negative Declaration was revised to a Mitigated Negative Declaration in response to comment by the Gabrieleno Band Of Mission Indians/Kizh Tribe Of the Los Angeles Basin, Orange County and the Channel islands, and the Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe that the proposed project is within a highly culturally sensitive area and within prehistoric village sites, to require onsite certified Native American monitors on the Certified, Sanctioned Most Likely Descendants (MLDs) and Insured Monitors list during all ground disturbances. 3. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5, the Mitigated Negative Declaration may be adopted without recirculation because the document has not been substantially revised and additional mitigation measures in response to public comments have been made conditions of project approval. 4. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, the City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Based on the whole record, the City Council finds that: (i) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) there is no substantial evidence that the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment with the mitigation measures incorporated. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the proposed project, filed at the City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, incorporating Condition of Approval #22. Section 9. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby sustains the decision of the Planning Commission and approves Precise Development Plan 15-11, Parking Plan 15-7, and Conditional Use Permit 15-10 subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans reviewed by the City Council on November 24, 2015, except as may be required to comply with these conditions and codes. Minor modifications that do not affect scale, type, location or intensity of uses may be approved by the Community Development Director when not in conflict with the findings or conditions of this permit. a) All hotel guestrooms shall comply with Section 15.04.060 regulating room size. b) Mechanical equipment associated with heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems shall be designed, located and operated so as to not exceed 45 decibels at any property line. c) All roof equipment shall be located and designed to be screened from public view and any portion that exceeds the height limit shall not cover more than 5% of the roof area. 8 d) Plans shall reflect that use of all spaces within the hotel are for use of hotel guests and not for use by the general public. f) The installation of a conduit from the service panel to the roof shall be required to assist and encourage the installation of roof mounted energy collection/generation devices. Said electric service panel shall be of adequate size to provide capacity for the future addition of photovoltaic and solar thermal, or other equivalent alternative energy producing device(s). Solar panel installations and other roof attachments shall conform to the provisions of Section 15.04.084. 2. Architectural treatments and accessory facilities shall be as shown on building elevations, site and floor plans. Precise building height compliance shall be reviewed at the time of Plan Check and prior to Certificate of Occupancy, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 3. Final building plans/construction drawings including site, elevation, floor plan, sections, details, signage, landscaping and irrigation submitted for building permit issuance shall be reviewed for consistency with the plans approved by the City Council and the conditions of this resolution, and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. 4. Plans shall comply with all requirements of the Public Works, Building and Fire Departments and additionally the project shall: a) Construct new curb and gutter on Hermosa Avenue and 15 th St. b) Construct new sidewalk on Hermosa Avenue and 15 th St. c) Construct handicapped ramp at 15 th St/Hermosa Avenue and 15th Ct./Hermosa Avenue. d) Construct an onsite infiltration system in compliance with Chapter 15.48.020. e) Grind 2” AC and overlay pavement on 15 th Street, property line to property line to the center of 15th Street. Reconstruct or grind 2” and overlay AC entire length of property on 15th Ct. Reconstruct cross gutters at 15th Ct. and 15th Street and Hermosa Ave. to match new grade. f) On civil plans, show all site drainage lines and termination points via curb drains, show sewer lines (minimum of 2 sewer laterals required), and show underground utility lines. g) An encroachment permit shall be required to allow canopies, bicycle racks and landscaping encroaching into the public right-of-way prior to issuance of building permit. 5. Encroachments permits shall be obtained from the Public Works Department for all improvements and work within the public right-of-way prior to commencement of work. 6. Two copies of a Final Landscaping Plan, consistent with landscape plans approved by the Planning Commission, indicating size, type, quantity and characteristics of landscape materials shall be submitted to the Community Development Department, Planning Division for review 9 and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The Final Plan shall also include the following: a) The plan shall comply with Municipal Code Sections 17.22.060(H)(3) and 8.60.070 to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. b) An automatic landscape sprinkler system consistent with Municipal Code Section 17.22.060(H) (3) shall be provided, and shall be shown on plans (Building Permits are required). Only drip irrigation shall be used. 7. Plans and operations shall comply with Municipal Code Chapter 8.56 Water Conservation and Drought Management Plan. 8. All exterior lights shall be designed, located and oriented in a manner to insure that neighboring residential property and public right-of-way shall not be adversely affected. Exterior architectural lighting on the building façade and elevations shall not utilize tube-type lighting; however, low intensity lighting projected onto the building may be used. All other exterior lighting shall be down cast, fully shielded and illumination shall be contained within the property boundaries. Lamp bulbs and images shall not be visible from within any offsite residential unit. Light intensity shall be the minimum necessary for the intended purpose. Exterior lighting shall not be deemed finally approved until thirty days after installation, during which period the building official may order the dimming or modification of any illumination found to be excessively brilliant or impacting to nearby properties. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed Electrical Engineer, with a letter from the engineer stating that, in the opinion of the engineer, this requirement has been met. 9. A Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan shall be submitted in full compliance with Municipal Code Chapter 8.44 ‘Stormwater and Urban Runoff Pollution Control Regulations’ and 15.48 ‘Green Building Standards’. Said approved plan for urban and stormwater runoff controls approved by Public Works Department shall be set forth on the construction plans in accordance with Chapter 8.44 and Section 8.44.090, and the applicant shall at all times comply with the required best management practices. 10. A Sign Permit shall be obtained prior to issuance of certificate of final occupancy. Signage shall comply with Municipal Code Chapter 17.50 (Signs) and be substantially consistent with conceptual signage on project plans approved on November 24, 2015. 11. Project design and the driveway encroachment onto 15 th Street shall be configured to minimize loss of on street parking. One in-lieu fee in the amount of $28,900 to mitigate the loss of one on street parking space shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the Certificate of Final Occupancy. All costs associated with relocation of on-street parking spaces, meters and signage shall be borne by the applicant. 12. A parking management plan shall be submitted for review and approval of the Community Development Director prior to issuance of any building permit consistent with this permit and the Coastal Development Permit. a) Employees shall not be prohibited from parking onsite. Employee parking permits shall be paid for by the hotel management for employees that desire them, and this information shall be provided to all employees as a benefit of employment. 10 b) The parking management plan shall provide details on the 24-hour valet parking operations. c) A 24-hour per day onsite valet service shall manage all onsite circulation and parking. d) No charge shall be made for onsite parking at any time. e) The valet service shall minimize fugitive light from headlamps and emissions by turning off vehicles and their headlamps and when vehicles are in the queuing lane. f) Hotel guests, visitors, employees and service providers shall be directed to utilize the 15th Street project driveway to access the site and directional signage shall be provided to this effect. Valet service shall not be provided to assist guest arrival and loading/unloading from the public right-of-way. Signage shall direct guests to pull into the garage for arrival and loading/unloading. g) Vendors shall access the site during off-peak hours when they may park onsite or when metered spaces are not likely to be occupied. h) The site shall be operated so as to avoid stopping over the sidewalk and queuing onto public right-of-way. i)Appropriate pavement markings (i.e., stop bar with STOP legend) shall be installed on the project drive aisle just south of the public sidewalk to ensure that motorists stop prior to the sidewalk along 15th Street and at the 15th Court project drive aisle before exiting the site. j) A pavement left turn arrow prior to the stop bar/STOP legend shall be installed on the 15th Court project drive aisle to reinforce the left turn only movement for motorists exiting the site. k) Bicycle parking shall be provided on the ground level of the project site in a readily accessible location(s). A durable secure facility accommodating a minimum of 10 bicycles shall be provided in the approximate location shown on the plans. Should it be relocated, the location shall provide an equivalent level of security and accessibility, provided that bicycle facilities shall not be located within the five foot rear yard setback. l)The business shall prominently display on the hotel website, and in the lobby, information on local biking, transit, electric vehicle charging stations, and other alternative transportation modes. One electric vehicle charging station shall be provided as shown on the plan submitted October 20, 2015. m) A plan to stage and manage of parking for construction vehicles and workers to minimize impacts on parking supply and adjoining uses shall be provided. 13. The primary use is a hotel. The provision of alcoholic beverages is restricted to mini-bars in guest rooms. 14. Accommodations shall not be rented by guests for more than 30 consecutive days. 11 15. No entertainment, speakers, or televisions are allowed on the exterior of the building, in the open-air areas, or on guest room balconies. No live entertainment is permitted in the building. The applicant will work with staff to designate an on-premises smoking area which provides on premises smoking in lieu of use and impacts to the public-right-of-way to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 16. Use of the food service area on the first floor, and the multi-function room on the second levels, and the spa/patio/sitting room on the third level shall cease no later than 10:00 p.m. daily. Each of these spaces may be occupied by not more than 20 people at any one time, unless further restricted by code. These three spaces may be used for activities limited to hotel guests (including their guests). 17. The business shall provide adequate staffing, management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business and on balconies outside guest rooms. 18. The business and its uses shall not adversely affect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 19. Should the Police Chief determine that a continuing police problem exists, he/she may, subject to appeal to the Planning Commission, direct the presence of a police approved security personnel to eliminate the problem. An appeal to the Planning Commission shall be heard within sixty (60) days of filing the appeal. The Police Chief’s determination will not be stayed during the pendency of the appeal. If the problem persists, the Police Chief then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission, which will automatically initiate a review of the conditional use permit. 20. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and maintained free of graffiti at all times. 21. An approved Coastal Development Permit issued by the California Coastal Commission shall be filed with the City prior to commencement of any work whatsoever. The project and its operation shall comply with all Coastal Commission requirements, including but not limited to submittal of the Coastal Development Permit issued by the California Coastal Commission for development at 1429 Hermosa Avenue prior to issuance of grading shoring and construction permits, and provision or payment of any fee required in lieu of provision of low to moderate cost overnight visitor accommodations. 22. The project shall comply with the 65% demolition debris recycling requirement set for the in Section 15.48.020. 23.A certified Native American monitor(s) shall be onsite at all times during ground disturbances. All contractors shall be advised of this condition and it shall be prominently displayed on project plans. The applicant/contractor shall contact the Chairman of Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians/Kizh Tribe of the Los Angeles Basin, Orange County and the Channel Islands and Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe at the time that a grading, shoring or any other building or construction permit is applied for, and in no case less than least 90 days prior to commencement of any work to arrange for monitors. Should human remains be recognized or discovered during any phase of the project, all work shall cease and the procedures set forth in Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 shall be followed in addition to any other requirements of state or federal law. The Community Development Director 12 shall also be notified. The reasonable costs of such monitors as determined by the City and any resulting mitigation required by the City or by law shall be borne by the applicant. Prior to issuance of any construction permit, the project applicant shall provide documentation to the Community Development Director that the procedures above have been followed. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Final Occupancy, applicant shall submit a report of final compliance to the Community Development Director. 24. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, abutting property owners and residents within 100 feet of the project site shall be notified of the anticipated date for commencement of construction. a) The form of the notification shall be provided by the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. b) Building permits will not be issued until the applicant provides an affidavit certifying mailing of the notice. 25. Project construction shall conform to the Noise Control Ordinance requirements in Section 8.24.050. Allowed hours of construction shall be printed on the building plans and posted at construction site. 26. Construction equipment shall be well maintained and a no idling requirement will be implemented. 27. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. 28. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. 29. Approval of these permits shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval by the Planning Commission, unless significant construction or improvements or the use authorized hereby has commenced. One or more extensions of time may be requested. No extension shall be considered unless requested, in writing to the Community Development Director including the reason therefore, at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. No additional notice of expiration will be provided. 30. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit or Precise Development Plan or Parking Plan and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. Section 10. To the extent permitted by law, permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Hermosa Beach, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the “indemnified parties”) from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void any approval for this project authorized by the City, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorney’s fees and costs in 13 defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. Section 11. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the decision of the City Council must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this ___ day of _______, 2015 by the following vote: VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ____________________________________________________________________ PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK ________________CITY ATTORNEY Attachment 3: Legal Posting LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Study Area .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Project Description .................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Site Location ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Project Site ........................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Proposed Project Description ............................................................................................ 6 3.0 Mobility Review ......................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Existing Project Site Vehicular Access ............................................................................. 8 3.2 Proposed Project ................................................................................................................. 9 3.2.1 Vehicular Site Access Review .............................................................................. 9 3.2.2 Pedestrian Access Review .................................................................................... 10 3.2.3 Bicycle Access Review ......................................................................................... 11 3.2.4 Service and Delivery Operations .......................................................................... 12 3.3 Site Distance Review ......................................................................................................... 12 3.3.1 Project Driveway Sight Distance Review ............................................................ 14 3.4 Project Access Recommendations ..................................................................................... 14 4.0 Existing Street System ............................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Local Roadway System ..................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Roadway Descriptions ....................................................................................................... 15 4.3 Public Bus Transit Service ................................................................................................. 17 5.0 Traffic Counts ............................................................................................................................ 20 6.0 Traffic Forecasting Methodology ............................................................................................ 24 6.1 Project Traffic Generation ................................................................................................. 24 6.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment .................................................................... 26 7.0 Future Traffic Conditions ........................................................................................................ 30 7.1 Related Projects Traffic Characteristics ............................................................................ 30 7.2 Ambient Traffic Growth .................................................................................................... 35 8.0 Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology .................................................................................... 36 8.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds ......................................................................................... 36 8.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization Methods of Analysis .................................................... 36 8.2.1 Signalized Intersections ......................................................................................... 36 8.2.2 Unsignalized Intersections .................................................................................... 37 8.3 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios .................................................................................... 38 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) SECTION PAGE 9.0 Traffic Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 39 9.1 Existing Traffic Conditions ............................................................................................. 39 9.1.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................. 39 9.1.2 Existing With Project Conditions........................................................................ 39 9.2 Future Traffic Conditions ................................................................................................ 39 9.2.1 Future Without Project Conditions ..................................................................... 39 9.2.2 Future With Project Conditions .......................................................................... 46 10.0 Transportation Improvement Measures .............................................................................. 49 10.1 Project Access Recommendations ................................................................................... 49 10.2 Transportation Demand Management ............................................................................. 50 11.0 Congestion Management Program Traffic Impact Assessment ........................................ 51 11.1 Intersections ..................................................................................................................... 51 11.2 Freeways .......................................................................................................................... 51 11.3 Transit Impact Review ..................................................................................................... 52 12.0 Parking Supply-Demand Analysis ........................................................................................ 53 12.1 City Code Parking Analysis ............................................................................................ 53 12.1.1 City Code Parking Requirements ........................................................................ 53 12.1.2 Planned Parking Supply ...................................................................................... 54 12.1.3 Project Parking Supply-Demand Analysis ......................................................... 55 12.2 Shared Parking Demand Analysis ................................................................................... 55 12.2.1 Shared Parking Rationale and Basis ................................................................... 55 12.2.2 Shared Parking Analysis Results ........................................................................ 56 12.3 Parking Recommendations .............................................................................................. 56 13.0 Summary of Findings and Conclusions ................................................................................ 59 APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Traffic Count Data B. Intersection Level of Service Data Worksheets C. Shared Parking Demand Data LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) LIST OF FIGURES SECTION—FIGURE # PAGE 1–1 Vicinity Map ...................................................................................................................... 2 2–1 Ground Floor Site Plan ...................................................................................................... 7 4–1 Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Controls ............................................. 16 4–2 Existing Public Transit Routes ........................................................................................... 19 5–1 Existing Traffic Volumes – Weekday AM Peak Hour .................................................... 22 5–2 Existing Traffic Volumes – Weekday PM Peak Hour ..................................................... 23 6–1 Project Trip Distribution .................................................................................................... 27 6–2 Project Traffic Volumes – Weekday AM Peak Hour ...................................................... 28 6–3 Project Traffic Volumes – Weekday PM Peak Hour ....................................................... 29 7–1 Location of Related Projects ............................................................................................... 32 7–2 Related Projects Traffic Volumes – Weekday AM Peak Hour ....................................... 33 7–3 Related Projects Traffic Volumes – Weekday PM Peak Hour ....................................... 34 9–1 Existing With Project Traffic Volumes – Weekday AM Peak Hour .............................. 42 9–2 Existing With Project Traffic Volumes – Weekday PM Peak Hour .............................. 43 9–3 Future Without Project Traffic Volumes – Weekday AM Peak Hour ........................... 44 9–4 Future Without Project Traffic Volumes – Weekday PM Peak Hour ............................ 45 9–5 Future With Project Traffic Volumes – Weekday AM Peak Hour ................................. 47 9–6 Future With Project Traffic Volumes – Weekday PM Peak Hour .................................. 48 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) LIST OF TABLES SECTION—TABLE # PAGE 4–1 Existing Transit Routes ....................................................................................................... 18 5–1 Existing Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................... 21 6–1 Project Trip Generation ..................................................................................................... 25 7–1 List of Related Projects and Related Projects Trip Generation .......................................... 31 8–1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections........................................................ 36 8–2 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections ................................................... 37 8–3 Intersection Impact Threshold Criteria ............................................................................... 38 9–1 Existing Conditions Levels of Service Summary ............................................................... 40 9–2 Future Conditions Level of Service Summary.............................................................. 41 12–1 Weekday Shared Parking Demand Analysis ...................................................................... 57 12–2 Weekend Shared Parking Demand Analysis ................................................................ 58 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT City of Hermosa Beach, California February 13, 2013 1.0 INTRODUCTION This traffic impact study addresses the potential traffic impacts and parking requirements associated with the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project. The project applicant proposes to develop a boutique type hotel with one parking level to be located at 1429 Hermosa Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. The proposed project site is situated along the west side of Hermosa Avenue between 15th Street to the north and 15th Court to the south. The proposed 1429 Hermosa Avenue project site location and general vicinity are shown in Figure 1-1. This report1 This traffic report satisfies the traffic impact study requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach and is consistent with the 2010 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County documents the findings and recommendations of a traffic impact analysis, as well as a parking analysis, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG Engineers) to determine the potential impacts associated with the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project. The traffic analysis evaluates the existing operating conditions at eight (8) key study intersections within the project vicinity, estimates the trip generation potential of the proposed project, and forecasts future operating conditions without and with the proposed project. Where necessary, intersection improvements and/or mitigation measures are identified. This report has been prepared in consultation with City of Hermosa Beach staff and the City’s consultant Traffic Engineer. 2 1 This report supersedes the previously submitted document, Traffic Impact Study, Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project, City of Hermosa Beach, California, prepared by LLG Engineers and dated November 26, 2012. The Scope of Work for this traffic study was developed in conjunction with the City of Hermosa Beach staff and the City’s consultant Traffic Engineer. The project site has been visited and an inventory of adjacent area roadways and intersections was performed. Existing peak hour traffic information has been collected at the eight (8) key study locations on a typical weekday (i.e., Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) for use in the preparation of intersection Level of Service calculations. Information concerning cumulative projects (planned and/or approved) in the vicinity of the proposed project has been researched at the City of Hermosa Beach. Based on recent research, eight (8) related projects are planned in the City of Hermosa Beach. These eight (8) planned and/or approved related projects were therefore considered in the cumulative traffic analysis for this project. 2 2010 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2010. - 1 - - 2 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc This traffic report analyzes existing and future weekday AM peak hour and PM peak hour traffic conditions for a future-term (Year 2014) traffic setting upon completion of the proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel project. Peak hour traffic forecasts for the Year 2014 horizon year have been projected by increasing existing traffic volumes by an annual growth rate of one percent (1.0%) per year and adding traffic volumes generated by eight (8) related projects. In addition, the planned project parking supply is compared with the City of Hermosa Beach Off-street Parking Code requirement. 1.1 Study Area Eight (8) study intersections have been identified for evaluation during the weekday morning and afternoon peak hours based upon coordination with City of Hermosa Beach staff and the City’s contract Traffic Engineer. The study intersections provide local access to the study area and define the extent of the boundaries for this traffic impact analysis. Further discussion of the existing street system and study area is provided in Section 4.0. The general location of the project in relation to the study locations and surrounding street system is presented in Figure 1-1. The traffic analysis study area is generally comprised of those locations which have the greatest potential to experience significant traffic impacts due to the proposed project as defined by the Lead Agency. In the traffic engineering practice, the study area generally includes those intersections that are: a. Immediately adjacent or in close proximity to the project site; b. In the vicinity of the project site that are documented to have current or projected future adverse operational issues; and c. In the vicinity of the project site that are forecast to experience a relatively greater percentage of project-related vehicular turning movements (e.g., at freeway ramp intersections). The locations selected for analysis were based on the above criteria, proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel project peak hour vehicle trip generation, anticipated distribution of project vehicular trips and existing intersection/corridor operations. The eight (8) intersections listed below provide local access to the study area and define the extent of the boundaries for this traffic impact investigation. 1. Manhattan Avenue/27th Street-Greenwich Village 2. Hermosa Avenue/15th Street 3. Hermosa Avenue/14th Street 4. Hermosa Avenue/13th Street - 3 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 5. Hermosa Avenue/Pier Avenue 6. Manhattan Avenue West/Pier Avenue 7. Manhattan Avenue East/Pier Avenue 8. Monterey Boulevard/Pier Avenue The Volume-to-Capacity and Level of Service investigations at these key locations were used to evaluate the potential traffic-related impacts associated with area growth, cumulative projects and the proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel project. When necessary, this report recommends intersection improvements that may be required to accommodate future traffic volumes and restore/maintain an acceptable Level of Service, and/or to mitigate the impact of the project. Included in this traffic and parking analysis are: • Existing traffic counts, • Estimated project traffic generation/distribution/assignment, • Estimated cumulative project traffic generation/distribution/assignment, • Weekday AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for existing conditions (Year 2012) without and with project traffic, • Weekday AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for future (Year 2014) conditions without and with project traffic, • Project-specific improvements, where necessary, • Congestion Management Program Traffic Impact Assessment, and • Parking analysis evaluation. - 4 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project applicant seeks to obtain entitlements to construct a boutique-type hotel with one parking level to be located in the Downtown district of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. The proposed project site is situated along the west side of Hermosa Avenue between 15th Street to the north and 15th Court to the south. The proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel project site location and general vicinity are shown in Figure 1-1. 2.1 Site Location The project site is located within close proximity to Lower Pier Avenue, the City’s public parking structure, the Hermosa Beach Pier, and The Strand, as well as the Hermosa Avenue and Pier Avenue commercial corridors. The project location and development concept will promote the efficient and convenient travel by all appropriate modes (e.g., pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and vehicular) for hotel guests and employees. In addition, the project will complement the Downtown area environment where different modes of travel co-exist and share the roadway, providing seamless connections and reinforcing each other to develop a balanced and efficient transportation system. The project site is located approximately two blocks from the City’s public parking structure, which is located west of Hermosa Avenue between 14th Court and 13th Street. The public parking structure currently provides a total of 359 parking spaces, including 261 public spaces and 98 spaces allocated to the Beach House Hotel for guest and valet parking. The City of Hermosa Beach planned and constructed this public parking structure to serve the Downtown district and encourage development in the vicinity. The City’s parking structure is complementary of its Municipal Zoning Code which provides parking in-lieu fees for projects located in the Downtown district. Parking in-lieu fees are used to encourage development in the Downtown district, while planning and providing for parking on a district-wide basis. Generally, in-lieu parking provides the opportunity to cluster parking (as the City of Hermosa Beach has done with the existing Downtown parking structure), to build parking more efficiently, and to facilitate development in locations with difficult parcel configurations. 2.2 Existing Project Site The existing project site is situated at 1429 Hermosa Avenue, at the southwest corner of the Hermosa Avenue/15th Street intersection and is currently vacant. The project site was previously occupied by two buildings that were utilized for restaurant uses (i.e., Classic Burger restaurant and Hermosa Beach Donuts & Coffee restaurant), and surface parking spaces. All of the prior buildings and surface parking spaces on the project site were demolished as part of a previously proposed development project. - 5 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 2.3 Proposed Project Description The project site is located at 1429 Hermosa Avenue (at the southwest corner of the Hermosa Avenue/15th Street intersection). The existing project site is currently vacant. The proposed project consists of the development of a boutique hotel with a total of 30 guest rooms including eight double rooms and 22 single (king) rooms, and ancillary support facilities (e.g., lobby/check-in, sitting areas, and multi-purpose spaces, etc.) as is commonly provided within most hotels. However, it should be noted that the proposed project will not include banquet halls, other large scale meeting space, or restaurants/lounges for non-guests. The proposed project is planned to include a total of roughly 30 parking spaces with all of the parking spaces provided on the ground level. Vehicular access to the site is planned to be provided via a single driveway on 15th Street along the northerly property frontage and via a single driveway on 15th Court along the southerly property frontage. Additionally, all parking for guests and visitors at the proposed project will be conducted via valet parking operations. Construction of the proposed project is planned to begin in year 2013 with occupancy in year 2014. The ground floor level site plan for the proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel project is illustrated in Figure 2-1. - 6 - - 7 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 3.0 MOBILITY REVIEW As discussed with City staff and the City’s consultant Traffic Engineer, a review has been prepared of access to the project site in terms of mobility for all travel modes including vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, goods movement (i.e., service/delivery for the proposed project), transit, etc. The City of Hermosa Beach has long committed to promote and develop efficient and convenient travel by all appropriate modes. As stated in the Final Circulation Transportation and Parking (Final CTP) Element of the City of Hermosa Beach General Plan (March 1990), “OVERALL GOAL: Provide a balanced transportation system for the safe and efficient transport of people and goods consistent with the goals of the Land Use Element.” The objectives of the Final CTP Element include maximizing use of alternative transportation modes and minimizing residential neighborhood traffic intrusion. The goals and policies in the General Plan recognize the built-out character of Hermosa Beach and reflect the constraints imposed by a long-established street network, as well as relatively fixed land use patterns. However, the City’s chief aim is to work creatively within these constraints to enhance all modes of transportation and to provide for safe and efficient circulation for all City residents and visitors. The mobility review includes consideration of vehicular access to and from the project site, pedestrian and bicycle access in the project vicinity, and service/delivery access to the project site. Brief summaries of the key mobility and access associated with the project are provided in the following subsections. 3.1 Existing Project Site Vehicular Access Vehicular access to the existing project site is provided via a total of two driveways including one driveway on 15th Street and one driveway on 15th Court. It is noted that the existing site driveways are no longer in use as the project site has been vacant for the last few years. Brief descriptions of the existing project site driveways are provided in the following paragraphs. • Existing Site: 15th Street Driveway This driveway is located on the south side of 15th Street (i.e., along the northerly property frontage) near the westerly portion of the project site. This existing site driveway is situated roughly 75 feet west of Hermosa Avenue and previously provided access to the surface parking lot on the site. The existing 15th Street driveway accommodates full access (i.e., left- turn and right-turn ingress and egress vehicular turning movements). - 8 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc • Existing Site: 15th Court Driveway This driveway was located on the north side of 15th Court (i.e., along the southerly property frontage), approximately mid-way between the westerly property boundary and Hermosa Avenue. The prior site 15th Court driveway previously accommodated full access (i.e., left- turn and right-turn ingress and egress vehicular turning movements). 3.2 Proposed Project 3.2.1 Vehicular Site Access Review The proposed site access scheme for the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project is displayed in Figure 2-1. Access to the proposed project site will be provided via a total of two driveways: one driveway on 15th Street and one driveway on 15th Court. The two proposed project site driveways are located in similar locations to the prior site driveways. Descriptions of the planned project site access points are provided in the following paragraphs. • Proposed Project: 15th Street Driveway This project driveway will be located on the south side of 15th Street, approximately mid-way along the northerly property frontage. The proposed project site driveway is planned to be 25 feet in width and will be located just easterly of the existing site driveway on 15th Street which provided access to the site. The proposed 15th Street project site driveway will accommodate full access (i.e., left-turn and right-turn ingress and egress turning movements) into and out of the site. However, it is noted that nearly all traffic movements at this driveway will be westbound left-turn inbound and northbound right-turn outbound movements as 15th Street terminates at The Strand just west of the project site. It is anticipated that the 15th Street driveway will be the primary access point for guests and visitors at the project. This driveway will provide access to the internal site drive aisle where the valet operations station will be situated for drop-off and pick-up operations. The planned project site driveway will be constructed to City of Hermosa Beach design standards. • Proposed Project: 15th Court Driveway This project driveway will be located on the north side of 15th Court, approximately mid-way along the southerly property frontage. The proposed project site driveway is planned to be 25 feet in width and will be located in essentially the same location as the prior site driveway on 15th Court which provided access to the site. As 15th Court terminates at Noble Park just west of the project site, it is anticipated that traffic movements at this site driveway be limited to westbound right-turn ingress and southbound left-turn egress turning movements into and out of the site. The planned project site driveway will be constructed to City of Hermosa Beach design standards. - 9 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc Vehicular access to the proposed project site will be accommodated via the two driveways as described above (i.e., one driveway on 15th Street and one driveway on 15th Court). With this site access configuration, the potential vehicle-pedestrian-bicycle conflicts are essentially the same as when the site was previously occupied. It should be noted that the location, placement and configuration of the future on-street parking spaces along the 15th Street property frontage will need to be developed in coordination with the City’s Public Works Department. At a minimum, it is anticipated that the on-street parking spaces adjacent to the project site will need to be adjusted to accommodate the new site driveway location and that one on-street parking space may need to be removed. Should this occur, it is recommended that the project applicant contribute an in-lieu fee to the City’s improvement fund towards the Downtown district to mitigate the net loss of the public parking space. 3.2.2 Pedestrian Access Review Downtown Hermosa Beach experiences a high level of pedestrian activity, particularly along the Hermosa Avenue, The Strand and Pier Avenue near the project site. Based on the existing level of pedestrian activity in the area and the proximity of these key corridors, it is anticipated that there also will be a high level of pedestrian activity generated to and from the proposed project. The proposed project site has been designed to encourage pedestrian activity and walking as a transportation mode3. As indicated in Figure 2-1, pedestrian walkways are planned throughout the site, as well as connect to the adjacent sidewalks, in a manner that promotes walkability. Walkability is a term for the extent to which walking is readily available as a safe, connected, accessible and pleasant mode of transport.4 • Connectivity: People can walk from one place to another without encountering major obstacles, obstructions, or loss of connectivity. There are five basic requirements that are widely accepted as key aspects of the walkability of urban areas that should be satisfied. The underlying principle is that pedestrians should not be delayed, diverted, or placed in danger. The five primary characteristics of walkability are as follows: • Convivial: Pedestrian routes are friendly and attractive, and are perceived as such by pedestrians. • Conspicuous: Suitable levels of lighting, visibility and surveillance over its entire length, with high quality delineation and signage. • Comfortable: High quality and well-maintained footpaths of suitable widths, attractive landscaping and architecture, shelter and rest spaces, and a suitable allocation of roadspace to pedestrians. 3 For example, refer to http://www.walkscore.com/, which generates a walkability score of approximately 83 (Very Walkable – most errands can be accomplished on foot) out of 100 for the project site. Walk Score calculates the walkability of an address by locating nearby stores, restaurants, schools, parks, etc. Walk Score measures how easy it is to live a car-lite lifestyle—not how pretty the area is for walking. - 10 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc • Convenient: Walking is a realistic travel choice, partly because of the impact of the other criteria set forth above, but also because walking routes are of a suitable length as a result of land use planning with minimal delays. A review of the project site plan and pedestrian walkways indicates that these five primary characteristics are accommodated as part of the proposed project. The project site is adjacent to and accessible from the Downtown Hermosa Beach area, nearby retail, restaurant and entertainment opportunities, as well as The Strand and the beach. The pedestrian walkways within the site will be appropriately landscaped and adorned to provide a friendly walking environment. Additionally, the walkways and connections with the external environment will be well lit and include a wayfinding signage program. Pedestrian project access to the site will be provided along the 15th Street and Hermosa Avenue property frontages. Pedestrian circulation around the periphery of the project site will be accommodated by the public sidewalks. The main lobby entrance for pedestrians will be accessed via the internal drive aisle and the sidewalks along both Hermosa Avenue and 15th Street. Within the lobby area, an elevator and stairwells will be provided for pedestrian access to/from the upper floors of the building (i.e., Stairwell Nos. 1 and 2). A secondary stairwell (i.e., Stairwell No. 3) for pedestrian access to/from the upper floors of the building will be provided along the westerly property frontage. 3.2.3 Bicycle Access Review Bicycle access to the project site is facilitated by the City of Hermosa Beach bicycle roadway network. A total of four existing or proposed bicycle facilities (e.g., Class I Bicycle Path, Class II Bicycle Lanes, Class III Bicycle Routes, Proposed Bicycle Routes, etc.) in the City’s bicycle network are located within an approximate one-half mile radius from the project site. The following bicycle facilities are located in the vicinity of the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project site: • - The Strand: Class I Bicycle Lane North-South Routes - Hermosa Avenue: Class III Bicycle Route with Sharrows/Share the Road Signs - Monterey Boulevard: Proposed Class III Bicycle Route with Sharrows/Share the Road Signs 4 Chapter 4 of the Pedestrian Network Planning and Facilities Design Guide, Government of New Zealand, from the www.ltsa.govt.nz website. - 11 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc • - Pier Avenue: Proposed Class III Bicycle Route with Sharrows/Share the East-West Routes Road Signs The Federal and State transportation system recognizes three primary bikeway facilities: Bicycle Paths (Class I), Bicycle Lanes (Class II), and Bicycle Routes (Class III). Bicycle Paths (Class I) are exclusive car free facilities that are typically not located within a roadway area. Bicycle Lanes (Class II) are part of the street design that is dedicated only for bicycles and identified by a striped lane separating vehicle lanes from bicycle lanes. Bicycle Routes (Class III) are preferably located on collector and lower volume arterial streets. Use of bicycles as a transportation mode to and from the project site should be encouraged by the provision of ample and safe parking. It is recommended that the proposed project include bicycle parking within the ground floor of the project site. The bicycle spaces should be provided in a readily accessible location(s). The selected location(s) should encourage use and maintain visibility for personal safety and theft protection. Appropriate lighting will be provided to increase safety and provide theft protection during night-time parking. 3.2.4 Service and Delivery Operations As 15th Court is a discontinuous roadway, it is recommended that service and deliveries (e.g., daily linen service/delivery) at the proposed project site be conducted via use of the on-street meter parking along the Hermosa Avenue frontage during early morning hours, rather than conducting head-in and back-out maneuvers to/from 15th Court. This recommendation is intended to limit the potential conflicts between service/delivery vehicles with pedestrians and bicyclists along Hermosa Avenue, particularly since the egress movement from 15th Court would require backup movements. Also, it is recommended that consideration be given to signing one or possibly two on-street meter spaces along the Hermosa Avenue property frontage as “No Parking Except Trucks” for the identified service and delivery early morning hours (e.g., 7:00 to 9:00 AM). The location of the on- street space(s) and designated early morning service/delivery hours can be determined in consultation with City staff. 3.3 Sight Distance Review Based on comments received from City staff and the City’s consultant traffic engineer, a review has been prepared of the sight distance at the project driveway in terms of vehicular movements and pedestrian circulation. The sight distance evaluation includes a review of vehicular access to and from the project driveway on 15th Street. Brief summaries of the key existing and proposed project conditions are presented in the following paragraphs. - 12 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc • Existing Site Driveway on 15th Street The existing site driveway on 15th Street is situated approximately 67 feet west of Hermosa Avenue (i.e., measured from the beginning curb radius on 15th Street at Hermosa Avenue to the east side of the driveway). The existing driveway is approximately 21 feet wide. Three public on-street meter parking spaces are currently provided between the existing site driveway and Hermosa Avenue. Five feet of painted red curb is provided immediately east of the existing site driveway. Immediately west of the existing site driveway the following on-street elements are provided: two feet of painted red curb, one public on-street metered parking space, and then an approximate 30-foot wide private driveway associated with an adjacent apartment building. • Proposed Project Site Driveway on 15th Street The proposed project site driveway on 15th Street will be relocated easterly to a point approximately 49 feet west of Hermosa Avenue (i.e., measured from the beginning curb radius on 15th Street). Two public metered parking spaces can be retained between the proposed project site driveway and Hermosa Avenue. However, it is recommended that these two metered parking spaces be shifted roughly five feet easterly toward Hermosa Avenue. Approximately five feet of painted red curb also can be provided immediately east of the proposed site driveway. Immediately west of the project site driveway, painted red curb will be extended between the site driveway and the existing metered parking space (i.e., for a total of roughly 15 feet of red curb). While the proposed project site driveway placement could result in the loss of one on-street metered parking space when compared to existing conditions, the sight distance for exiting hotel motorists would be improved with the project (i.e., since only two feet of red curb exists west of the existing site driveway and 15 feet of red curb would be provided west of the project site driveway in the future with construction of the proposed hotel). • Public Sidewalks A 13-foot wide sidewalk is currently provided adjacent to the project site along the 15th Street property frontage. A six-foot wide sidewalk is presently provided adjacent to the project site along the Hermosa Avenue property frontage. No changes to the adjacent public sidewalks are expected to occur as part of the proposed project. - 13 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 3.3.1 Project Driveway Sight Distance Review As vehicles exiting the project site are anticipated to turn right to travel easterly to Hermosa Avenue, the sight distance for eastbound motorists approaching the driveway will be significantly improved based on both the relocation of the project site driveway and the extension of red curb west of the proposed project site driveway. The sight distance for westbound motorists approaching the project site driveway is essentially the same as existing conditions. However, as previously noted, it is anticipated that motorists exiting the site will turn right to travel to Hermosa Avenue, thus, conflicts between exiting vehicles and westbound motorists on Hermosa Avenue are not expected to occur. 3.4 Project Access Recommendations The following measures are recommended to facilitate access to and from the planned project site: • Direct project site guests and visitors to utilize the 15th Street project driveway to access the site. • Direct vendors to utilize the designated on-street meter parking space(s) along the Hermosa Avenue property frontage for service and deliveries at the project site in order to limit potential conflicts between service/delivery vehicles with pedestrians and bicyclists. • Develop a parking management plan for the proposed project, including details on the internal valet parking operations to address any potential queuing onto public right-of- way. • Install appropriate pavement markings (i.e., stop bar with STOP legend) on the project drive aisle just south of the public sidewalk to ensure that motorists stop prior to the sidewalk along 15th Street and at the 15th Court project drive aisle before exiting the site. • Install a pavement right-turn arrow prior to the stop bar/STOP legend on the 15th Street project drive aisle to reinforce the right-turn only movement for motorists exiting the site. • Install a pavement left-turn arrow prior to the stop bar/STOP legend on the 15th Court project drive aisle to reinforce the left-turn only movement for motorists exiting the site. • Provide bicycle parking within the ground floor of the project site in a readily accessible location(s). The selected location(s) should encourage use and maintain visibility for personal safety and theft protection. Appropriate lighting will be provided to increase safety and provide theft protection during night-time parking. - 14 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 4.0 EXISTING STREET SYSTEM 4.1 Local Roadway System The local network of streets serving the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project study area includes Hermosa Avenue, Manhattan Avenue, 14th Street, 14th Court and Pier Avenue. The eight (8) intersections listed below provide local access to the study area and define the extent of the boundaries for this traffic impact investigation. 1. Manhattan Avenue/27th Street-Greenwich Village 2. Hermosa Avenue/15th Street 3. Hermosa Avenue/14th Street 4. Hermosa Avenue/13th Street 5. Hermosa Avenue/Pier Avenue 6. Manhattan Avenue West/Pier Avenue 7. Manhattan Avenue East/Pier Avenue 8. Monterey Boulevard/Pier Avenue Five of the eight study intersections (Intersection Nos. 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8) selected for analysis are controlled by stop signs. The remaining study intersections (Intersection Nos. 3, 4, and 5) are currently traffic signal controlled. The existing lane configurations at the eight study intersections are displayed in Figure 4-1. Brief descriptions of the important roadways in the project vicinity are provided in the following paragraphs. 4.2 Roadway Descriptions A brief description of the important roadways in the project vicinity is provided in the following paragraphs. Hermosa Avenue is a north-south oriented roadway that borders the project site to the east. Hermosa Avenue provides primary north-south circulation through the Downtown Hermosa Beach area. Two through travel lanes are provided in each direction along the roadway within the project study area. The Hermosa Avenue/Pier Avenue intersection is currently traffic signal controlled, with separate left-turn phasing provided for the southbound left-turn movement. Three-hour metered parking on Hermosa Avenue is generally allowed on both sides of the roadway and is enforced seven days a week from 10:00 AM to 10:00 PM. Hermosa Avenue is posted for a 25 miles per hour speed limit near the project site. - 15 - - 16 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc Manhattan Avenue is a north-south oriented roadway that is located one block east of the project site. Manhattan Avenue provides local north-south traffic access in the vicinity of the project site. One through travel lane is provided in each direction along the roadway within the project study area. The Manhattan Avenue/Pier Avenue intersection is currently stop sign controlled, with the stop signs facing the Manhattan Avenue approaches. Manhattan Avenue is posted for a 25 miles per hour speed limit within the project study area. Monterey Boulevard is a north-south oriented roadway that is located east of the project site. Monterey Boulevard provides local north-south traffic access in the vicinity of the project site. One through travel lane is provided in each direction along the roadway within the project study area. The Monterey Boulevard/Pier Avenue intersection is currently all-way stop sign controlled. Monterey Boulevard is posted for a 25 miles per hour speed limit within the project study area. 15th Street is an east-west oriented roadway that borders the project site to the north. Near the project site, 15th Street extends between Hermosa Avenue to the east and the The Strand/beach to the west. One through travel lane is provided in each direction along the roadway within the project study area. Three-hour parking from 10:00 AM to 10:00 PM is generally allowed along both sides of 15th Street in the project study area. Twenty-four hour resident parking is also accommodated along both sides of 15th Street near the project site with resident parking passes. There is no posted speed limit on this segment of 15th Street in the project vicinity, thus it is assumed to be a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour. 15th Court is an east-west oriented roadway that borders the project site to the south. Near the project site, 15th Court extends between Hermosa Avenue to the east to its terminus at Noble Park to the west. Two-way travel is accommodated along 15th Court near the project site. Parking is prohibited along both sides of 15th Court within the project study area. Pier Avenue is an east-west oriented roadway that is located south of the project site. Pier Avenue provides primary east-west circulation through the Downtown Hermosa Beach area, extending between Hermosa Avenue to the west to Pacific Coast Highway to the east. One through travel lane is provided in each direction along the roadway within the project study area. West of Hermosa Avenue, Pier Avenue is a pedestrian plaza area. However, emergency vehicle access is accommodated along this section of Pier Avenue. Pier Avenue is posted for a 25 miles per hour speed limit near the project site. 4.3 Public Bus Transit Service Public bus transit service within the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project study area is currently provided by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, City of Redondo Beach – Beach Cities Transit, and the City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation. A summary of the existing transit service, including the transit route, destinations and peak hour headways is presented in Table 4-1. The existing public transit routes in the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project site vicinity are illustrated in Figure 4-2. - 17 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project ROADWAY(S) ROUTE DESTINATIONS NEAR SITE DIR AM PM Metro Route 130 Redondo Beach to Cerritos via Hermosa Beach, Torrance,Pier Avenue, Monterey Boulevard EB 2 2 Harbor Gateway, Carson, Compton, North Long Beach,WB 3 2 Bellflower Commuter Express 438 Palos Verdes & Via Valencia to Downtown Los Angeles Manhattan Avenue, 27th Street, Hermosa NB 3 0 Avenue, Pier Avenue SB 0 2 Total 8 6 [1] Sources: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), LADOT Transit Services websites, 2012. Table 4-1 EXISTING TRANSIT ROUTES [1] NO. OF BUSES/TRAINS DURING PEAK HOUR - 18 - - 19 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 5.0 TRAFFIC COUNTS Based on discussions with the City’s contract Traffic Engineer, new manual counts of vehicular turning movements were conducted at each of the eight study intersections during the weekday morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) commuter periods to determine the peak hour traffic volumes. The manual counts were conducted by traffic count subconsultants, City Traffic Counters and The Traffic Solution, at the eight study intersections from 7:00 to 9:00 AM to determine the AM peak commuter hour, and from 4:00 to 6:00 PM to determine the PM peak commuter hour. Traffic volumes at the eight study intersections show the morning and afternoon peak periods typically associated with peak commuter hours in the metropolitan area. In addition, a count of pedestrian, bicycle and truck volumes was collected during the peak periods in conjunction with the manual turning movement vehicle counts. The existing weekday AM and PM peak commuter period manual counts of turning vehicles at the eight study intersections are summarized in Table 5-1. The existing traffic volumes at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak commuter hours are shown in Figures 5-1 and 5-2, respectively. Summary data worksheets of the manual traffic counts at the study intersections are contained in Appendix A. - 20 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project Table 5-1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOURNO.INTERSECTION DATE DIR BEGAN VOLUME BEGAN VOLUME 1 Manhattan Avenue/11/01/2012 NB 7:30 278 5:00 141 27th Street-Greenwich Village [1]SB 187 496 EB 384 151 WB 152 222 2 Hermosa Avenue/11/01/2012 NB 7:45 416 5:00 240 15th Street [2]SB 198 435 EB 21 14 WB 0 0 3 Hermosa Avenue/11/01/2012 NB 7:45 435 5:00 266 14th Street [2]SB 214 443 EB 28 28 WB 17 37 4 Hermosa Avenue/11/01/2012 NB 7:45 461 5:00 265 13th Street [2]SB 199 430 EB 22 76 WB 0 0 5 Hermosa Avenue/11/01/2012 NB 7:45 467 5:00 271 Pier Avenue [2]SB 216 454 EB 0 0 WB 141 163 6 Manhattan Avenue (West)/11/01/2012 NB 8:00 78 5:00 40 Pier Avenue [1]SB 0 0 EB 185 195 WB 182 312 7 Manhattan Avenue (East)/11/01/2012 NB 8:00 0 5:00 0 Pier Avenue [1]SB 65 125 EB 253 220 WB 217 306 8 Monterey Boulevard/11/01/2012 NB 7:45 150 5:00 162 Pier Avenue [1]SB 74 113 EB 236 261 WB 241 354 [1]Counts conducted by City Traffic Counters [2]Counts conducted by The Traffic Solution - 21 - - 22 - - 23 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 6.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTING METHODOLOGY In order to estimate the traffic impact characteristics of the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project, a multi-step process has been utilized. The first step is trip generation, which estimates the total arriving and departing traffic volumes on a peak hour and daily basis. The traffic generation potential is forecast by applying the appropriate vehicle trip generation equations or rates to the project development tabulation. The second step of the forecasting process is trip distribution, which identifies the origins and destinations of inbound and outbound project traffic volumes. These origins and destinations are typically based on demographics and existing/anticipated travel patterns in the study area. The third step is traffic assignment, which involves the allocation of project traffic to study area streets and intersections. Traffic assignment is typically based on minimization of travel time, which may or may not involve the shortest route, depending on prevailing operating conditions and travel speeds. Traffic distribution patterns are indicated by general percentage orientation, while traffic assignment allocates specific volume forecasts to individual roadway links and intersection turning movements throughout the study area. With the forecasting process complete and project traffic assignments developed, the impact of the proposed project is isolated by comparing operational (i.e., LOS) conditions at selected key intersections using expected existing and future traffic volumes without and with forecast project traffic. The need for site-specific and/or cumulative local area traffic improvements can then be evaluated and the significance of the project’s impacts identified. 6.1 Project Traffic Generation Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation equations and/or rates used in the traffic forecasting procedure are found in the 9th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington D.C., 2012]. Based on discussions with the City’s consultant Traffic Engineer, ITE Land Use Code 310 (Hotel) trip generation average rates were used to forecast the traffic volumes expected to be generated by the 30 guest rooms planned for the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project. Traffic volumes expected to be generated by the proposed project were based upon rates per number of occupied rooms to be provided as part of the proposed project. The trip generation rates and forecast of the vehicular trips anticipated to be generated by the proposed project are presented in Table 6-1. The project trip generation forecast was submitted for review and approval by the City’s consultant Traffic Engineer. - 24 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project Table 6-1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION [1] DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR TRIP ENDS [2]VOLUMES [2]VOLUMES [2] LAND USE SIZE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Hotel [3]30 Occ. Rooms 268 12 8 20 10 11 21 268 12 8 20 10 11 21 [1]Source: ITE "Trip Generation", 9th Edition, 2012. [2]Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. [3]ITE Land Use Code 310 (Hotel) trip generation average rates. - Daily Trip Rate: 8.92 trips/occupied room; 50% inbound/50% outbound - AM Peak Hour Trip Rate: 0.67 trips/occupied room; 58% inbound/42% outbound - PM Peak Hour Trip Rate: 0.70 trips/occupied room; 49% inbound/51% outbound TOTAL - 25 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc As presented in Table 6-1, the proposed project is expected to generate 20 vehicle trips (12 inbound trips and 8 outbound trips) during the weekday AM peak hour. During the weekday PM peak hour, the proposed project is expected to generate 21 vehicle trips (10 inbound trips and 11 outbound trips). Over a 24-hour period, the proposed project is forecast to generate 268 daily trip ends during a typical weekday (134 inbound trips and 134 outbound trips). 6.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment The general, directional traffic distribution pattern for the proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel project is presented in Figure 6-1. Project traffic volumes both entering and exiting the site have been distributed and assigned to the adjacent street system based on the following considerations: • The site's proximity to major traffic corridors (i.e., Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue, Pacific Coast Highway and Gould Avenue/Artesia Boulevard), • Expected localized traffic flow patterns based on adjacent roadway channelization and presence of traffic signals, • Existing intersection traffic volumes, • Ingress/egress availability at the project site, • The location of existing and proposed parking areas, and • Input from the City’s consultant Traffic Engineer. The forecast weekday AM and PM peak hour project traffic volumes associated with the proposed project are presented in Figures 6-2 and 6-3, respectively. The traffic volume assignments presented in Figures 6-2 and 6-3 reflect the traffic distribution characteristics shown in Figure 6-1 and the project traffic generation forecasts presented in Table 6-1. - 26 - - 27 - - 28 - - 29 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 7.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The forecast of future pre-project conditions was prepared in accordance to procedures outlined in Section 15130 of the CEQA Guidelines. Specifically, the CEQA Guidelines provide two options for developing the future traffic volume forecast: “(A) A list of past, present, and probable future projects producing related or cumulative impacts, including, if necessary, those projects outside the control of the [lead] agency, or (B) A summary of projections contained in an adopted local, regional or statewide plan, or related planning document, that describes or evaluates conditions contributing to the cumulative effect. Such plans may include: a general plan, regional transportation plan, or plans for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. A summary of projections may also be contained in an adopted or certified prior environmental document for such a plan. Such projections may be supplemented with additional information such as a regional modeling program. Any such document shall be referenced and made available to the public at a location specified by the lead agency.” Accordingly, the traffic analysis provides a highly conservative estimate of future pre-project traffic volumes as it incorporates both the “A” and “B” options outlined in CEQA Guidelines for purposes of developing the forecast. 7.1 Related Projects Traffic Characteristics A forecast of on-street traffic conditions prior to occupancy of the proposed project was prepared by incorporating the potential trips associated with other known development projects (related projects) in the area. With this information, the potential impact of the proposed project can be evaluated within the context of the cumulative impact of all ongoing development. The related projects research was based on information on file at the City of Hermosa Beach. The list of related projects in the project site area and a brief description for each of the eight (8) related projects is presented in Table 7–1. The location of the related projects is shown in Figure 7–1. Traffic volumes expected to be generated by the related projects were calculated using rates provided in the ITE Trip Generation manual. The related projects’ respective traffic generation for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, as well as on a daily basis for a typical weekday, is summarized in Table 7-1. As shown in Table 7-1, the related projects are expected to generate a combined total of 9,282 daily trips during a typical weekday, 457 trips (271 inbound trips and 186 outbound) during the weekday AM peak hour, and 875 trips (431 inbound trips and 444 outbound trips) during the weekday PM peak hour. The anticipated distribution of the related projects traffic volumes to the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours is displayed in Figures 7-2 and 7-3, respectively. - 30 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project Table 7-1RELATED PROJECTS LIST AND TRIP GENERATION [1] PROJECT DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR MAP ADDRESS/LAND USE DATA DATA TRIP ENDS [2]VOLUMES [2]VOLUMES [2] NO.LOCATION LAND-USE SIZE SOURCE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL 1 824 1st Street Office 3,000 GSF [3]33 4 1 5 1 3 4 2 1221-1223 Hermosa Avenue Bank 6,600 GSF [4]978 46 34 80 80 80 160 3 205 Pier Avenue Office/Retail 6,000 GSF [5]256 4 2 6 11 11 22 4 2101 Pacific Coast Highway Office 10,124 GSF [3]112 14 2 16 3 12 15 Condominium 21 DU [6]122 2 7 9 7 4 11 5 906 Hermosa Avenue Office 8,780 GSF [3]97 12 2 14 2 11 13 Condominium 21 DU [6]122 2 7 9 7 4 11 6 Pier Avenue to 13th Street Hotel 100 rooms [7]892 39 28 67 34 36 70 (The Strand to parking lot) 7 2420 Pacific Coast Highway Retail 120,000 GLSF [5]5,124 71 44 115 214 231 445 950 Artesia Boulevard Restaurant 12,000 GSF [8]1,526 72 58 130 71 47 118 8 555 6th Street Heavy Industrial 3 acres [9]20 5 1 6 1 5 6 9,282 271 186 457 431 444 875 [1]Sources: City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department. Trip generation for the related projects are based on the ITE "Trip Generation", 9th Edition, 2012 (as referenced in the Project Data Source column). [2]Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. [3]ITE Land Use Code 710 (General Office) trip generation average rates. [4]ITE Land Use Code 912 (Drive-In Bank) trip generation average rates. [5]ITE Land Use Code 820 (Shopping Center) trip generation average rates. [6]ITE Land Use Code 230 (Residential Condominium) trip generation average rates. [7]ITE Land Use Code 310 (Hotel) trip generation average rates. [8]ITE Land Use Code 932 (High-Turnover Sit-Down Restaurant) trip generation average rates. [9]ITE Land Use Code 120 (General Heavy Industrial) trip generation average rates. TOTAL- 31 - - 32 - - 33 - - 34 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 7.2 Ambient Traffic Growth Horizon year, background traffic growth estimates also have been calculated by using an ambient traffic growth factor. The ambient traffic growth factor is intended to include unknown related projects in the study area, as well as account for typical growth in traffic volumes due to the development of projects outside the study area. The future growth in traffic volumes has been calculated at one percent (1.0%) per year. The ambient growth factor was based on review of the background traffic growth estimates for the South Bay/LAX area (RSA 18) published in the 2010 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County, which indicate that existing traffic volumes would be expected to increase at an annual rate of less than one percent (approximately 0.26% per year) between years 2010 and 2015. However, a one percent (1.0%) ambient traffic growth factor has been employed in this analysis in order to provide a conservative, worst case forecast of future traffic volumes in the area. Application of the ambient traffic growth factor to existing Year 2012 traffic volumes results in a two percent (2.0%) increase in existing traffic volumes to horizon Year 2014. Further, it is noted that the CMP manual’s traffic growth rate is intended to anticipate future traffic generated by development projects in the project vicinity. Thus, the inclusion in this traffic analysis of both a forecast of traffic generated by known related projects plus the use of an ambient growth traffic factor based on CMP traffic model data results in a conservative estimate of future traffic volumes at the study intersections. - 35 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 8.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY 8.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds The relative impact of the added project traffic volumes generated by the proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel project during the AM and PM peak hours was evaluated based on analysis of future operating conditions at the eight (8) key study intersections, without, then with, the proposed project. The significance of the potential project impacts at each key intersection was then evaluated using the traffic impact criteria employed in previous analyses for projects in the City of Hermosa Beach. A significant transportation impact is determined based on the sliding scale criteria presented in Table 8-1. TABLE 8-1 INTERSECTION IMPACT THRESHOLD CRITERIA Final ICU Level of Service Project Related Increase in ICU > 0.801-0.900 D – signalized equal to or greater than 0.02 > 0.901 or greater E/F – signalized equal to or greater than 0.01 Drop in LOS by one level D/E/F - unsignalized --- As indicated in Table 8-1, the project-related increase in ICU value for the signalized intersections that defines a significant impact varies with LOS. At LOS D the threshold of significance is an increase of 0.02 or greater in the ICU value for signalized intersections. This is reduced to 0.01 or greater under LOS E and F. Similarly, for the unsignalized intersections, a decrease in LOS by one level or more is considered significant for those locations operating at LOS D, E, or F. 8.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization Methods of Analysis 8.2.1 Signalized Intersections In conformance with the City of Hermosa Beach and Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program requirements, existing weekday AM and PM peak hour operating conditions for the key signalized study intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. The ICU methodology is intended for signalized intersection analyses and estimates the volume-to-capacity (V/C) relationship for an intersection based on the individual V/C ratios for key conflicting traffic movements. The ICU numerical value represents the percent signal (green) time, and thus capacity, required by existing and/or future traffic. It should be noted that the ICU methodology assumes uniform traffic distribution per intersection approach lane and optimal signal timing. The ICU value translates to a LOS estimate, which is a relative measure of the intersection performance. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service have been defined along with the corresponding ICU value range and are shown in Table 8-2. A description of the ICU method and corresponding Level of Service is provided in Appendix B. - 36 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc TABLE 8-2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service (LOS) Intersection Capacity Utilization Value (V/C) Level of Service Description A ≤ 0.600 EXCELLENT. No vehicle waits longer than one red light, and no approach phase is fully used. B 0.601 – 0.700 VERY GOOD. An occasional approach phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. C 0.701 – 0.800 GOOD. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red light; backups may develop behind turning vehicles. D 0.801 – 0.900 FAIR. Delays may be substantial during portions of the rush hours, but enough lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines, preventing excessive backups. E 0.901 – 1.000 POOR. Represents the most vehicles intersection approaches can accommodate; may be long lines of waiting vehicles through several signal cycles. F > 1.000 FAILURE. Backups from nearby locations or on cross streets may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches. Potentially very long delays with continuously increasing queue lengths. Pursuant to Los Angeles County CMP requirements, the ICU calculations use a lane capacity of 1,600 vehicles per hour (vph) for left-turn, through, and right-turn lanes, and a dual left-turn capacity of 2,880 vph. Additionally, a clearance adjustment factor of 0.10 was added to each Level of Service (LOS) calculation. The ICU value is the sum of the critical volume to capacity ratios at an intersection; it is not intended to be indicative of the LOS of each of the individual turning movements. According to City of Hermosa Beach criteria, LOS D (V/C ratio = 0.801 to 0.900) is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained during the morning and evening peak commute hours. 8.2.2 Unsignalized Intersections The Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM2010) methodology outlined in Chapter 19 for unsignalized/two-way stop-controlled study intersections was utilized for the analysis of the unsignalized intersections. The TWSC methodology estimates the average control delay for each minor-street movement (or shared movement) as well as major-street left-turns and determines the LOS for each constrained movement. It should be noted that LOS is not defined for the overall TWSC intersection because major-street movements with no delays typically result in a weighted average delay that is extremely low. Average control delay for any particular movement is a function of the capacity of the approach and the degree of saturation. The average control delay is - 37 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc measured in seconds per vehicle, and includes delay due to deceleration to a stop at the back of the queue from free-flow speed, move-up time within the queue, stopped delay at the front of the queue, and delay due to acceleration back to free-flow speed. A description of the HCM method and corresponding Level of Service is also provided in Appendix B. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service have been defined along with the corresponding HCM control delay value range, as shown in Table 8-3. TABLE 8-3 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service (LOS) Highway Capacity Manual Delay Value (sec/veh) Level of Service Description A ≤ 10.0 Little or no delay B > 10.0 and ≤ 15.0 Short traffic delays C > 15.0 and ≤ 25.0 Average traffic delays D > 25.0 and ≤ 35.0 Long traffic delays E > 35.0 and ≤ 50.0 Very long traffic delays F > 50.0 Severe congestion 8.3 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios Pursuant to City of Hermosa Beach and Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program requirements, Level of Service calculations have been prepared for the following scenarios for the study intersections: (a) Existing (Year 2012) conditions. (b) Condition (a) with completion and occupancy of the project. (c) Condition (b) with implementation of project mitigation measures where necessary. (d) Condition (a) plus one percent (1.0%) annual ambient traffic growth through Year 2014 and with completion and occupancy of the related projects (i.e., future Year 2014 without project conditions) (e) Condition (d) with completion and occupancy of the project (i.e., future Year 2014 with project conditions). (f) Condition (e) with implementation of project mitigation measures where necessary. The traffic volumes for each new condition were added to the volumes in the prior condition to determine the change in capacity utilization at the study intersections. - 38 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 9.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS The traffic impact analysis prepared for the study intersections using the ICU and HCM methodologies with application of the City of Hermosa Beach significant traffic impact criteria is summarized in Table 9–1 for existing traffic conditions. The traffic impact analysis prepared for the study intersections using the ICU and HCM methodologies with application of the City of Hermosa Beach significant traffic impact criteria is summarized in Table 9–2 for future traffic conditions. The ICU and HCM data worksheets for the analyzed intersections are contained in Appendix B. 9.1 Existing Traffic Conditions 9.1.1 Existing Conditions As indicated in column [1] of Table 9–1, all eight study intersections are presently operating at LOS B or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours under existing conditions. The existing traffic volumes at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours are displayed in Figures 5–1 and 5–2, respectively. 9.1.2 Existing With Project Conditions As shown in column [2] of Table 9–1, application of the City’s threshold criteria to the “Existing With Project” scenario indicates that the proposed project is not expected to create significant impacts at any of the eight study intersections. Incremental, but not significant, impacts are noted at the study intersections. Because there are no significant impacts, no traffic mitigation measures are required or recommended for the study intersections under the “Existing With Project” conditions. The existing with project traffic volumes at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours are illustrated in Figures 9–1 and 9–2, respectively. 9.2 Future Traffic Conditions 9.2.1 Future Without Project Conditions The future without project conditions were forecast based on the addition of traffic generated by the completion and occupancy of related projects, as well as the growth in traffic due to the combined effects of continuing development, intensification of existing developments and other factors (i.e., ambient growth). The v/c ratios and delay at all of the study intersections are incrementally increased with the addition of ambient traffic and traffic generated by the related projects listed in Table 7–1. As presented in column [1] of Table 9–2, all eight study intersections are expected to operate at LOS C or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours with the addition of growth in ambient traffic and related projects traffic under the future without project conditions. The future Year 2014 without project (existing, ambient growth and related projects) traffic volumes at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours are presented in Figures 9–3 and 9– 4, respectively. - 39 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project Table 9-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS DELAY AND LEVELS OF SERVICE WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOURS [1][2] YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 EXISTING WITH EXISTING PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. PEAK DELAY or LOS DELAY or LOS V/C IMPACT NO.INTERSECTION HOUR V/C [b]V/C [b][(2)-(1)][c] 1 Manhattan Avenue/AM 14.0 B 14.2 B 0.2 NO 27th Street-Greenwich Village [a]PM 14.2 B 14.4 B 0.2 NO 2 Hermosa Avenue/AM 9.8 A 10.1 B 0.3 NO 15th Street [a]PM 10.2 B 10.8 B 0.6 NO 3 Hermosa Avenue/AM 0.250 A 0.253 A 0.003 NO 14th Street PM 0.293 A 0.296 A 0.003 NO 4 Hermosa Avenue/AM 0.248 A 0.250 A 0.002 NO 13th Street PM 0.303 A 0.305 A 0.002 NO 5 Hermosa Avenue/AM 0.334 A 0.340 A 0.006 NO Pier Avenue PM 0.290 A 0.294 A 0.004 NO 6 Manhattan Avenue (West)/AM 9.7 A 9.7 A 0.0 NO Pier Avenue [a]PM 9.5 A 9.5 A 0.0 NO 7 Manhattan Avenue (East)/AM 11.1 B 11.1 B 0.0 NO Pier Avenue [a]PM 11.3 B 11.4 B 0.1 NO 8 Monterey Boulevard/AM 9.2 A 9.2 A 0.0 NO Pier Avenue [a]PM 10.2 B 10.2 B 0.1 NO [a]Unsignalized intersection. Reported value represents the highest delay (in seconds per vehicle) associated with the most constrained movement/approach to the intersection. [b]Level of Service (LOS) is based on the reported ICU value for signalized intersections and on the delay for unsignalized instesections. [c]According to City of Hermosa Beach, a transportation impact on an intersection shall be deemed significant in accordance with the following table: City of Hermosa Beach intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows: Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c >=0.801 - 0.900 D - signalized equal to or greater than 0.02 >=0.901 E/F - signalized equal to or greater than 0.01 Drop in LOS by one level D/E/F - unsignalized - 40 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project Table 9-2 FUTURE CONDITIONS SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOSDELAY AND LEVELS OF SERVICEWEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOURS [1][2] YEAR 2014 YEAR 2014 FUTURE FUTURE WITHOUT WITH PROJECT PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. PEAK DELAY or LOS DELAY or LOS V/C IMPACT NO.INTERSECTION HOUR V/C [b]V/C [b][(2)-(1)][c] 1 Manhattan Avenue/AM 16.3 C 16.6 C 0.2 NO 27th Street-Greenwich Village [a]PM 18.0 C 18.4 C 0.3 NO 2 Hermosa Avenue/AM 10.2 B 10.4 B 0.2 NO 15th Street [a]PM 10.6 B 11.3 B 0.7 NO 3 Hermosa Avenue/AM 0.263 A 0.265 A 0.002 NO 14th Street PM 0.315 A 0.317 A 0.002 NO 4 Hermosa Avenue/AM 0.292 A 0.295 A 0.003 NO 13th Street PM 0.443 A 0.445 A 0.002 NO 5 Hermosa Avenue/AM 0.393 A 0.399 A 0.006 NO Pier Avenue PM 0.363 A 0.367 A 0.004 NO 6 Manhattan Avenue (West)/AM 10.0 A 10.1 B 0.1 NO Pier Avenue [a]PM 10.0 A 10.1 B 0.1 NO 7 Manhattan Avenue (East)/AM 11.8 B 11.9 B 0.1 NO Pier Avenue [a]PM 12.6 B 12.7 B 0.1 NO 8 Monterey Boulevard/AM 9.7 A 9.7 A 0.0 NO Pier Avenue [a]PM 11.3 B 11.3 B 0.1 NO [a]Unsignalized intersection. Reported value represents the highest delay (in seconds per vehicle) associated with the most constrained movement/approach to the intersection. [b]Level of Service (LOS) is based on the reported ICU value for signalized intersections and on the delay for unsignalized intersections. [c]According to City of Hermosa Beach, a transportation impact on an intersection shall be deemed significant in accordance with the following table: City of Hermosa Beach intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows: Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c >=0.801 - 0.900 D - signalized equal to or greater than 0.02 >=0.901 E/F - signalized equal to or greater than 0.01 Drop in LOS by one level D/E/F - unsignalized - 41 - - 42 - - 43 - - 44 - - 45 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 9.2.2 Future With Project Conditions As shown in column [2] of Table 9–2, application of the City’s threshold criteria to the “With Proposed Project” scenario indicates that the proposed project is not expected to create significant impacts at the eight study intersections. Incremental, but not significant, impacts are noted at the study intersections and all study intersections are expected to continue operating at LOS C or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours with the addition of growth in ambient traffic, related projects traffic, and project traffic, as presented in Table 9–2. The future Year 2014 with project (existing, ambient growth, related projects and project) traffic volumes at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours are illustrated in Figures 9–5 and 9–6, respectively. - 46 - - 47 - - 48 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 10.0 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT MEASURES The results of the intersection capacity analyses summarized in Tables 9-1 and 9-2 indicate that the proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel is not expected to create significant impacts at any of the eight (8) key study intersections. As there are no significant impacts, no traffic mitigation measures are required or recommended for the study intersections. However, as previously noted (see Subsection 3.3), improvement measures are recommended to facilitate access to and from the planned project site. In addition, it is recommended that transportation demand management (TDM) measures be implemented as part of the proposed project. The subsections below provide summaries of the recommended access improvement measures and TDM measures. 10.1 Project Access Recommendations The following measures are recommended to facilitate access to and from the planned project site: • Direct project site guests and visitors to utilize the 15th Street project driveway to access the site. • Direct vendors to utilize the designated on-street meter parking space(s) along the Hermosa Avenue property frontage for service and deliveries at the project site in order to limit potential conflicts between service/delivery vehicles with pedestrians and bicyclists. • Develop a parking management plan for the proposed project, including details on the internal valet parking operations to address any potential queuing onto public right-of- way. • Install appropriate pavement markings (i.e., stop bar with STOP legend) on the project drive aisle just south of the public sidewalk to ensure that motorists stop prior to the sidewalk along 15th Street and at the 15th Court project drive aisle before exiting the site. • Install a pavement left-turn arrow prior to the stop bar/STOP legend on the 15th Court project drive aisle to reinforce the left-turn only movement for motorists exiting the site. • Provide bicycle parking within the ground floor of the project site in a readily accessible location(s). The selected location(s) should encourage use and maintain visibility for personal safety and theft protection. Appropriate lighting will be provided to increase safety and provide theft protection during night-time parking. - 49 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 10.2 Transportation Demand Management Transportation demand management measures are recommended to be components of the proposed project so as to make every effort to reduce vehicular traffic and parking generated at the project site. The TDM measures that may be implemented as part of the proposed project should be aimed at decreasing the number of vehicular trips generated by persons traveling to/from the site by offering specific facilities, services and actions designed to increase the use of alternative transportation modes (e.g., transit, walking, bicycling, etc.) and ridesharing. Listed below are examples of TDM measures that should be considered for the proposed project. • Promotion of Transportation Information. The Project Applicant (or Project Applicant’s successors and assigns) should provide on-site information for employees, hotel guests, and visitors about local public transit services, bus fare programs, ride share programs and shuttles, and bicycle facilities (including routes, rental and sales locations, on-site bicycle racks). The Project Applicant (or Project Applicant’s successors and assigns should also provide walking and biking maps for employees, hotel guests, and visitors, which shall include but not be limited to information about convenient local services and restaurants within walking distance of the project site. Such transportation information could be provided through a computer terminal with access to the world wide web. • TDM Web Site Information. The Project Applicant (or Project Applicant’s successors and assigns) should provide transportation information such as the items noted above, including links to local transit providers, area walking and bicycling maps, etc., to inform employees, hotel guests, and visitors of available alternative transportation modes to access the project site and travel in the area. • Convenient Parking and Facilities for Bicycle Riders. The Project Applicant (or Project Applicant’s successors and assigns) should provide a location(s) for convenient parking for bicycle commuters for employees working at the site, guests traveling to/from the site, and visitors to the site. The bicycle parking will be located within the project site such that long- term and short-term parkers can be accommodated. - 50 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 11.0 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT The Congestion Management Program (CMP) is a state-mandated program that was enacted by the State Legislature with the passage of Proposition 111 in 1990. The program is intended to address the impact of local growth on the regional transportation system. As required by the 2010 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County, a Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) has been prepared to determine the potential impacts on designated monitoring locations on the CMP highway system. The analysis has been prepared in accordance with procedures outlined in the 2010 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County, County of Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2010. 11.1 Intersections The following CMP intersection monitoring location in the project vicinity has been identified: • CMP Station No. 22 Pacific Coast Highway/Artesia Boulevard-Gould Avenue Intersection The CMP TIA guidelines require that intersection monitoring locations must be examined if the proposed project will add 50 or more trips during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours. The proposed project will not add 50 or more trips during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours (i.e., of adjacent street traffic) at the above CMP monitoring intersection in the project vicinity, which is stated in the CMP manual as the threshold criteria for a traffic impact assessment. Therefore, no further review of potential impacts to intersection monitoring locations that are part of the CMP highway system is required. 11.2 Freeways No CMP freeway monitoring locations are located in the project vicinity. Further, the CMP TIA guidelines require that freeway monitoring locations must be examined if the proposed project will add 150 or more trips (in either direction) during either the AM or PM weekday peak periods. The proposed project will not add 150 or more trips (in either direction), during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours to the CMP freeway monitoring location, which is the threshold for preparing a traffic impact assessment, as stated in the CMP manual. Therefore, no further review of potential impacts to freeway monitoring locations that are part of the CMP highway system is required. - 51 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 11.3 Transit Impact Review As required by the 2010 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County, a review has been made of the CMP transit service. Existing transit service is provided in the vicinity of the proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel project. The project trip generation, as shown in Table 6-1, was adjusted by values set forth in the CMP (i.e., person trips equal 1.4 times vehicle trips, and transit trips equal 3.5 percent of the total person trips) to estimate transit trip generation. Pursuant to the CMP guidelines, the proposed project is forecast to generate demand for one transit trip during the weekday AM peak hour. During the weekday PM peak hour, the proposed project also is anticipated to generate demand for one transit trip. Over a 24-hour period, the proposed project is forecast to generate demand for 13 daily transit trips. The calculations are as follows: • AM Peak Hour = 20 × 1.4 × 0.035 = 1 Transit Trip • PM Peak Hour = 21 × 1.4 × 0.035 = 1 Transit Trip • Daily Trips = 268 × 1.4 × 0.035 = 13 Transit Trips As shown in Table 4-1, two bus transit lines and routes are provided adjacent to or in close proximity to the project site, with one of these transit lines and routes directly serving the site along the project frontage. A total of two different bus transit providers provide service within the study area. As outlined in Table 4-1 under the “No. of Buses During Peak Hour” column, these two transit lines provide service for an average (i.e., an average of the directional number of buses during the peak hours) of approximately eight buses during the AM peak hour and six buses during the PM peak hour. Therefore, based on the above calculated peak hour transit trips, this would correspond to less than one transit rider per bus. Thus, given the low number of generated transit trips per bus, no impacts on existing or future transit services in the project area are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. - 52 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 12.0 PARKING SUPPLY-DEMAND ANALYSIS This parking analysis involves determining the expected parking needs based on the size and type of project land use components (i.e., boutique hotel with meeting/classroom space) and comparing that to the planned parking supply. In general, there are two methods that can be used to estimate the project’s future peak parking needs. These methods include the following: • Application of the City Code requirements (which typically treat each use in the project as a stand-alone use at maximum demand). • Application of shared parking usage patterns by time-of-day (which recognizes that the parking demand for each tenancy type varies by time-of-day and day-of-week). The shared parking analysis typically starts with a Code calculation for each tenancy type and is then adjusted accordingly to reflect the time of day, and/or weekly and monthly variations. The shared parking methodology is concluded to be applicable to a development such as the proposed project, as the project’s land use components (i.e., hotel rooms and meeting/classroom space) experience peak demands at different times of the day. The shared parking approach has been selected for determination purposes as it results in the most realistic determination of a site’s peak parking demand given the project development program. 12.1 City Code Parking Analysis 12.1.1 City Code Parking Requirements The number of parking spaces required to support the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project was calculated using the parking Code requirements as contained in Chapter 17.44 Off-Street Parking of the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code and compared with the proposed project parking supply. Specifically, Section 17.44.030 (Off-Street Parking – Commercial and Business Uses) and Section 17.44.040 (Parking Requirements for the Downtown District) apply to the proposed land use associated with the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project. The City’s Code parking requirements (i.e., Section 17.44.030 Off-Street Parking – Commercial and Business Uses and Section 17.44.040 - Parking Requirements for the Downtown District) for the proposed land uses associated with the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project are as follows: • H. Hotels: one (1.0) space per unit for the first fifty (50) units; one (1.0) space per one and one-half units after fifty (50) units; and one (1.0) space per two units after one hundred (100) units. Hotels with facilities including restaurants, banquet rooms, conference rooms, commercial retail uses and similar activities shall provide parking for the various uses as computed separately in accordance with the provisions in this chapter. • A. Auditoriums for churches, theater, entertainment, sports and other places and rooms of public assembly for more than twenty (20) persons; one space for each five seats, permanent or removable, or one space for each fifty (50) square feet of gross floor area in the auditorium, whichever is greater. - 53 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc The City Code parking requirements for the proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel project is calculated as follows: • 30 [Guest Rooms] × 1.0 [Spaces] = 30 Spaces • 695 SF [Meeting/Classroom Space] ÷ 50 = 14 Spaces • Total Code Requirement = 44 Spaces Direct application of the City Code parking requirements to the proposed project results in a Code requirement of 44 parking spaces. The City of Hermosa Beach provides for parking in-lieu fees for projects located in the Downtown district (see Section 14.44.040[E]). The City Code parking requirements provide for contribution to an improvement fund for a vehicle parking district to satisfy project parking requirements as defined in the Code. Parking in-lieu fees are used to encourage development in the Downtown district, while planning and providing for parking on a district-wide basis. Generally, in-lieu parking provides the opportunity to cluster parking (as the City of Hermosa Beach has done with the existing Downtown parking structure), to build parking more efficiently, and to facilitate development in locations with difficult parcel configurations. 12.1.2 Planned Parking Supply Based on information provided by the project architect and as shown on the proposed project site plan, a total of 30 marked parking spaces is planned to be provided. All 30 on-site marked parking spaces will be provided in the ground floor level of the project. It is noted that nine (9) tandem spaces (i.e., 18 total spaces) will be included within the project. As part of the parking supply, the project must also provide a minimum of two (2) handicap accessible spaces. This complies with the American With Disabilities Act (ADA) requirement of a minimum of two handicap spaces for parking facilities with 26 to 50 spaces, with one in every six handicap spaces being van accessible. Two (2) handicap accessible parking spaces, including one van handicap accessible space, will be provided as part of the proposed project parking supply, thus, the project will comply with ADA requirements. As previously noted, all parking for guests and visitors at the proposed project will be accommodated via valet parking operations. Valet operators typically utilize drive aisles and other unmarked areas for parking vehicles in order to maximize usage of parking facilities. As such, it is estimated that the project’s valet operators will be able to park a minimum of three (3) vehicles in the drive aisle by maneuvering vehicles within the site. Therefore, the effective project parking supply is calculated to be a total of 33 spaces including marked spaces and vehicles parked in the drive aisle through valet operations. - 54 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 12.1.3 Project Parking Supply-Demand Analysis With an effective project parking supply of 33 spaces (i.e., including marked spaces and valet attended vehicles parked in the drive aisle), the result is a theoretical shortfall of 11 spaces when compared to City Code requirement of 44 spaces. However, the proposed project provides an opportunity to share parking spaces based on the utilization profile of each included land use component. The following section calculates the parking requirements for the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project based on the shared parking methodology approach. 12.2 Shared Parking Demand Analysis 12.2.1 Shared Parking Rationale and Basis Accumulated experience in parking demand characteristics indicates that a mixing of land uses results in an overall parking need that is less than the sum of the individual peak requirements for each land use. Due to the proposed project characteristics, opportunities to share parking can be expected to occur when the hotel is used in combination with the meeting/classroom space. The objective of this shared parking analysis is to forecast the peak parking requirements for the project based on the combined demand patterns of the project’s different land use components. Shared parking calculations recognize that different uses often experience individual peak parking demands at different times of day, or days of the week. When uses share common parking footprints, the total number of spaces needed to support the collective whole is determined by adding parking profiles (by time of day for weekdays versus weekend days), rather than individual peak ratios as represented in the City of Hermosa Beach Zoning Code. In that way, the shared parking approach starts from the City's own Code ratios and results in the design level parking supply needs of a site. It should be noted that the demand results of the shared parking calculation are intended to be used directly for comparison to site supply. Further adjustments to account for walk-in and local patronage also can be applicable in addition to the time of day profiles applied to the peak parking ratios. There is an important common element between the traditional code and the shared parking calculation methodologies; the peak parking ratios or highpoint for each land use's parking profile typically equals the code parking ratio for that use. The analytical procedures for shared parking analyses are well documented in the Shared Parking, 2nd Edition publication by the Urban Land Institute (ULI). Shared parking calculations for the proposed project utilize hourly parking accumulations developed from field studies of single developments in free-standing settings, where travel by private auto is maximized. These characteristics permit the means for calculating peak parking needs when land use types are combined. Further, the shared parking approach illustrates how, at other than peak parking demand times, an increasing surplus of spaces will service the overall needs of the proposed project. The hourly parking demand profiles (expressed in percent of peak demand) utilized in this analysis and applied to the proposed project are based on profiles developed by the ULI and published in - 55 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc Shared Parking, 2nd Edition. The ULI publication presents hourly parking demand profiles for several land use categories such as retail, fine and casual dining, family restaurant, fast-food restaurant, office, medical-dental office, bank, health club leisure hotel, business hotel, etc. These profiles of parking demand have been used directly, by land use type, in the analysis of this site. Specifically, the Leisure Hotel and Conference Center/Banquet categories have been utilized for the project hotel and meeting/classroom land use components. It is noted that the shared parking demand analysis has been prepared using the ULI peak data for Leisure Hotel which typical during the months of July and August. In addition, it is noted that a 25 percent (25%) adjustment has been applied to the parking requirements for the meeting/classroom space to account walk-in patronage by local businesses and residents and internal capture. 12.2.2 Shared Parking Analysis Results The weekday and weekend (typically Saturday) parking demand profiles for the proposed project based on the shared parking methodology are presented in Tables 12-1 and 12-2, respectively. The sizing (number of rooms and square footage) of each component and parking ratios are included in the tabular headings of each land use type. The shared parking demand analysis data worksheets for the weekday and weekend parking design conditions are contained in Appendix C (refer to Appendix Tables C-1 and C-2, respectively). As indicated in Table 12-1, the peak weekday parking demand is expected to occur at 9:00 PM with a peak design level demand of 33 spaces. Based on the effective project parking supply of 33 spaces, the peak parking demand would be satisfied during the peak hour of a typical weekday during July/August conditions. As shown in Table 12-2, the peak weekend parking demand also is expected to occur at 9:00 PM with a peak design level demand of 37 spaces. Based on the effective project parking supply of 33 spaces, a deficiency of 4 spaces would result during the peak hour of a typical weekend day during July/August conditions. 12.3 Parking Recommendations As discussed above, a parking deficiency is forecast for the proposed project when comparing the shared parking demand with the effective parking supply for a typical weekend day under July/August conditions. Given the results of the parking evaluation, it is recommended that the project applicant implement one of the following two approaches to address the forecast deficit of 4 parking spaces: • Enter into a parking agreement to lease parking spaces from nearby private locations (e.g., 205 Pier Avenue, etc.) which have sufficient parking during the weekend peak hours forecast for the proposed project (i.e., during the special circumstance when all hotel rooms and both meeting rooms are fully booked); or • Contribute an in-lieu fee to an improvement fund for a vehicle parking district to mitigate the forecast parking deficit. As noted previously, City Code parking requirements provide for - 56 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project Table 12-1 WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] Month:Jul Land Use Leisure Hotel Conference Ctr /Banquet Size 30 Rms 0.695 KSF Peak Pkg Rate[2]1.00 /Rm 1.0 /50 SF Weekday Pkg Rate[3]0.97 /Rm 1.0 /50 SF [5] Gross Spaces 29 Spc.14 Spc.Comparison w/ Adjusted Gross 29 Spc.10 Spc.Parking Supply Spaces[4]Shared 33 Spaces Number of Number of Parking Surplus Time of Day Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency) 6:00 AM 22 0 22 11 7:00 AM 24 0 24 9 8:00 AM 26 3 29 4 9:00 AM 23 6 29 4 10:00 AM 22 6 28 5 11:00 AM 22 6 28 5 12:00 PM 21 7 28 5 1:00 PM 21 7 28 5 2:00 PM 22 7 29 4 3:00 PM 22 7 29 4 4:00 PM 22 7 29 4 5:00 PM 22 10 32 1 6:00 PM 22 10 32 1 7:00 PM 21 10 31 2 8:00 PM 22 10 32 1 9:00 PM 23 10 33 0 10:00 PM 23 5 28 5 11:00 PM 24 0 24 9 12:00 AM 23 0 23 10 Notes: [1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005. [5] Parking supply includes marked spaces and estimated valet parked spaces in drive aisle. [2] Peak parking rates based on City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code parking requirements. [3] Weekday parking rates based on the weekday parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. [4] Gross spaces adjusted (25%) to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, and/or local business and residents walk-in reduction. - 57 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project Table 12-2 WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] Month:Jul Land Use Leisure Hotel Conference Ctr /Banquet Size 30 Rms 0.695 KSF Peak Pkg Rate[2]1.00 /Rm 1.0 /50 SF Weekend Pkg Rate[3]1.00 /Rm 1.0 /50 SF [5] Gross Spaces 30 Spc.14 Spc.Comparison w/ Adjusted Gross 30 Spc.10 Spc.Parking Supply Spaces[4]Shared 33 Spaces Number of Number of Parking Surplus Time of Day Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency) 6:00 AM 24 0 24 9 7:00 AM 26 0 26 7 8:00 AM 28 3 31 2 9:00 AM 25 6 31 2 10:00 AM 23 6 29 4 11:00 AM 23 6 29 4 12:00 PM 21 7 28 5 1:00 PM 21 7 28 5 2:00 PM 23 7 30 3 3:00 PM 23 7 30 3 4:00 PM 24 7 31 2 5:00 PM 24 10 34 (1) 6:00 PM 24 10 34 (1) 7:00 PM 24 10 34 (1) 8:00 PM 26 10 36 (3) 9:00 PM 27 10 37 (4) 10:00 PM 26 5 31 2 11:00 PM 27 0 27 6 12:00 AM 27 0 27 6 Notes: [1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005. [5] Parking supply includes marked spaces and estimated valet parked spaces in drive aisle. [2] Peak parking rates based on City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code parking requirements. [3] Weekend parking rates reflect relationships between the weekend parking demand ratios and the peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. [4] Gross spaces adjusted (25%) to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, and/or local business and residents walk-in reduction. - 58 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc contribution to an improvement fund for a vehicle parking district to satisfy project parking requirements as defined in the Code. 13.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS • Project Description – The project site is located at 1429 Hermosa Avenue (at the southwest corner of the Hermosa Avenue/15th Street intersection). The proposed project consists of the development of a boutique hotel with a total of 30 guest rooms including eight double rooms and 22 single (king) rooms, and ancillary support facilities (e.g., lobby/check-in, sitting areas, etc.) as is commonly provided within most hotels. However, it should be noted that the proposed project will not include banquet halls, other large scale meeting space, or restaurants/lounges. The proposed project is planned to include a total of roughly 30 parking spaces with all of the parking spaces provided on the ground level. Vehicular access to the site is planned to be provided via a single driveway on 15th Street along the northerly property frontage and via a single driveway on 15th Court along the southerly property frontage. Additionally, all parking for guests and visitors at the proposed project will be conducted via valet parking operations. Construction of the proposed project is planned to begin in year 2013 with occupancy in year 2014. • Study Scope – The following eight (8) intersections were selected for detailed peak hour level of service analyses under Existing (Year 2012) Traffic Conditions, Existing With Project Traffic Conditions, Future (Year 2014) Without Project Traffic Conditions, and Future With Project Traffic Conditions: 1. Manhattan Avenue/27th Street-Greenwich Village 2. Hermosa Avenue/15th Street 3. Hermosa Avenue/14th Street 4. Hermosa Avenue/13th Street 5. Hermosa Avenue/Pier Avenue 6. Manhattan Avenue West/Pier Avenue 7. Manhattan Avenue East/Pier Avenue 8. Monterey Boulevard/Pier Avenue The analysis is focused on assessing potential traffic impacts during the morning and evening commute peak hours (between 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM) on a typical weekday. • Project Trip Generation – On a typical weekday, the proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel project is expected to generate 20 vehicle trips (12 inbound trips and 8 outbound trips) during the weekday AM peak hour. During the weekday PM peak hour, the proposed project is expected to generate - 59 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc 21 vehicle trips (10 inbound trips and 11 outbound trips). Over a 24-hour period, the proposed project is forecast to generate 268 daily trip ends during a typical weekday (134 inbound trips and 134 outbound trips). • Related Projects Trip Generation – Eight (8) related projects were considered as part of the cumulative traffic analysis. These eight (8) related projects are all located in the City of Hermosa Beach. On a typical weekday, the related projects are expected to generate a combined total of 9,282 daily trips during a typical weekday, 457 trips (271 inbound trips and 186 outbound) during the weekday AM peak hour, and 875 trips (431 inbound trips and 444 outbound trips) during the weekday PM peak hour. • Existing (Year 2012) Traffic Conditions – All eight (8) key study intersections currently operate at an acceptable service level (i.e., LOS B or better) during the weekday AM and PM peak hour based on City of Hermosa Beach LOS standards. • Existing (Year 2012) With Project Traffic Conditions - The results of the traffic analysis indicate that the proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel project is not expected to create significant impacts at any of the eight study intersections. Incremental, but not significant, impacts are noted at the study intersections. Because there are no significant impacts, no traffic mitigation measures are required or recommended for the study intersections under the “Existing With Project” conditions. However, improvement measures are recommended to facilitate access to and from the planned project site. • Future (Year 2014) Without Project Traffic Conditions – All eight study intersections are expected to operate at LOS C or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours with the addition of growth in ambient traffic and related project traffic under the future without project conditions based on City of Hermosa Beach LOS standards. • Future (Year 2014) Future With Project Traffic Conditions – The results of the traffic analysis indicate that the proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel project is not expected to create significant impacts at any of the eight study intersections. Incremental, but not significant, impacts are noted at the study intersections. Because there are no significant impacts, no traffic mitigation measures are required or recommended for the study intersections under the “Future With Project” conditions. However, improvement measures are recommended to facilitate access to and from the planned project site. • CMP Traffic Assessment – The results of the Los Angeles CMP indicated that the proposed Hermosa Boutique Hotel project will not adversely affect any CMP arterial monitoring intersections or freeway monitoring locations, as well as nearby transit operations. Therefore, no improvements/mitigation measures are required of this project. • Parking Supply-Demand Analysis – The required number of parking spaces for the Hermosa Boutique Hotel project, based on City Code parking requirement totals 44 spaces. With an - 60 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\3996-Report3.doc effective parking supply of 33 parking spaces including marked spaces and vehicles parked in the drive aisle with valet operations, the result is a theoretical shortfall of 11 spaces when compared to City Code requirement of 44 spaces. The results of the shared parking demand analysis, which is based on the ULI shared parking methodology, indicate that the parking supply is expected to result in a deficiency of 4 parking spaces during the peak hour of a typical weekend day during July/August conditions when the hotel and both meetings rooms are fully booked. Given the results of the parking evaluation, it is recommended that the project applicant either 1) enter into a parking agreement to lease parking spaces from nearby private locations (e.g., 205 Pier Avenue, etc.) which have sufficient parking during the weekend peak hours forecast for the proposed project (i.e., during the special circumstance when all hotel rooms and both meeting rooms are fully booked); or 2) Contribute an in-lieu fee to an improvement fund for a vehicle parking district to mitigate the forecast parking deficit. - 61 - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\Appendix Covers.doc APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNT DATA File Name : Man27th_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds Thru Peds Thru Peds Thru Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 07:15 AM 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 4 07:45 AM 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 6 Total 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 0 11 08:15 AM 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 7 08:30 AM 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 08:45 AM 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 4 Total 0 2 8 2 0 1 1 0 14 04:00 PM 1 0 0 4 1 0 3 0 9 04:15 PM 1 4 0 4 3 0 3 1 16 04:30 PM 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 2 11 04:45 PM 0 3 0 1 2 1 0 1 8 Total 2 11 0 12 6 3 6 4 44 05:00 PM 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 05:15 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 5 9 05:30 PM 4 3 1 0 0 1 3 1 13 05:45 PM 4 8 0 0 0 3 1 2 18 Total 8 14 2 3 0 4 4 8 43 Grand Total 10 29 10 21 6 13 11 12 112 Apprch %25.6 74.4 32.3 67.7 31.6 68.4 47.8 52.2 Total %8.9 25.9 8.9 18.8 5.4 11.6 9.8 10.7 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 3 3 0 0 0 6 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 7 08:30 AM 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Total Volume 0 3 3 7 2 9 0 4 4 0 0 0 16 % App. Total 0 100 77.8 22.2 0 100 0 0 PHF .000 .375 .375 .292 .250 .375 .000 .333 .333 .000 .000 .000 .571 Manhattan Ave Greenwich 27th St Manhattan Ave Thru0 Peds3 InOut Total0 3 3 Thru7 Peds2 OutTotalIn0 9 9 Thru 0 Peds 4 Out TotalIn 0 4 4 Thru0 Peds0 TotalOutIn7 0 7 Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM Bank 2 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 3 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 1 0 1 0 4 4 1 0 1 3 0 3 9 04:15 PM 1 4 5 0 4 4 3 0 3 3 1 4 16 04:30 PM 0 4 4 0 3 3 0 2 2 0 2 2 11 04:45 PM 0 3 3 0 1 1 2 1 3 0 1 1 8 Total Volume 2 11 13 0 12 12 6 3 9 6 4 10 44 % App. Total 15.4 84.6 0 100 66.7 33.3 60 40 PHF .500 .688 .650 .000 .750 .750 .500 .375 .750 .500 .500 .625 .688 Manhattan Ave Greenwich 27th St Manhattan Ave Thru2 Peds11 InOut Total6 13 19 Thru0 Peds12 OutTotalIn6 12 18 Thru6 Peds3 Out TotalIn2 9 11 Thru6 Peds4 TotalOutIn0 10 10 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Bank 2 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_Bus Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 07:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 Total 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 08:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 Total 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 04:45 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 Total 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 05:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 05:45 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 Grand Total 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 1 7 0 0 15 Apprch %0 0 100 0 0 0 50 0 50 100 0 0 Total %0 0 40 0 0 0 6.7 0 6.7 46.7 0 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_Bus Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 07:30 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 5 % App. Total 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .000 .500 .625 Manhattan Ave Greenwich 27th St Manhattan Ave Right1 Thru0 Left0 InOut Total4 1 5 Right0 Thru0 Left0 OutTotalIn0 0 0 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left4 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn1 4 5 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Bank 2 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_Bus Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 3 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 05:00 PM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 Total Volume 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 6 % App. Total 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .375 .375 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .250 .500 .000 .000 .500 .500 Manhattan Ave Greenwich 27th St Manhattan Ave Right 3 Thru 0 Left 0 InOut Total 2 3 5 Right0 Thru0 Left0 OutTotalIn1 0 1 Left0 Thru0 Right1 Out TotalIn0 1 1 Left2 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn3 2 5 Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM Bank 2 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 7 4 3 6 5 5 0 31 9 32 13 0 115 07:15 AM 11 4 16 9 10 6 0 43 10 49 31 1 190 07:30 AM 9 11 19 6 18 12 0 43 19 76 26 2 241 07:45 AM 17 16 19 10 15 18 0 55 10 64 20 0 244 Total 44 35 57 31 48 41 0 172 48 221 90 3 790 08:00 AM 12 22 22 13 14 6 0 53 22 76 31 3 274 08:15 AM 12 6 19 9 15 15 1 52 23 62 17 0 231 08:30 AM 13 5 14 10 14 30 0 34 19 46 22 1 208 08:45 AM 9 11 23 7 18 21 1 32 19 37 18 2 198 Total 46 44 78 39 61 72 2 171 83 221 88 6 911 04:00 PM 16 23 27 12 21 7 1 22 13 15 11 0 168 04:15 PM 13 31 45 13 33 7 0 19 13 31 18 0 223 04:30 PM 10 29 43 12 22 15 0 25 11 26 11 0 204 04:45 PM 20 27 61 11 23 11 1 19 16 25 15 3 232 Total 59 110 176 48 99 40 2 85 53 97 55 3 827 05:00 PM 16 37 57 10 24 12 0 21 9 20 16 1 223 05:15 PM 11 49 54 15 23 15 0 24 9 20 9 1 230 05:30 PM 16 46 65 13 29 13 0 15 17 26 15 3 258 05:45 PM 17 58 65 14 34 18 4 23 16 22 14 1 286 Total 60 190 241 52 110 58 4 83 51 88 54 6 997 Grand Total 209 379 552 170 318 211 8 511 235 627 287 18 3525 Apprch %18.3 33.2 48.4 24.3 45.5 30.2 1.1 67.8 31.2 67.3 30.8 1.9 Total %5.9 10.8 15.7 4.8 9 6 0.2 14.5 6.7 17.8 8.1 0.5 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 9 11 19 39 6 18 12 36 0 43 19 62 76 26 2 104 241 07:45 AM 17 16 19 52 10 15 18 43 0 55 10 65 64 20 0 84 244 08:00 AM 12 22 22 56 13 14 6 33 0 53 22 75 76 31 3 110 274 08:15 AM 12 6 19 37 9 15 15 39 1 52 23 76 62 17 0 79 231 Total Volume 50 55 79 184 38 62 51 151 1 203 74 278 278 94 5 377 990 % App. Total 27.2 29.9 42.9 25.2 41.1 33.8 0.4 73 26.6 73.7 24.9 1.3 PHF .735 .625 .898 .821 .731 .861 .708 .878 .250 .923 .804 .914 .914 .758 .417 .857 .903 Manhattan Ave Greenwich 27th St Manhattan Ave Right79 Thru55 Left50 InOut Total532 184 716 Right51 Thru62 Left38 OutTotalIn218 151 369 Left 1 Thru 203 Right 74 Out TotalIn 98 278 376 Left278 Thru94 Right5 TotalOutIn142 377 519 Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 3 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 16 37 57 110 10 24 12 46 0 21 9 30 20 16 1 37 223 05:15 PM 11 49 54 114 15 23 15 53 0 24 9 33 20 9 1 30 230 05:30 PM 16 46 65 127 13 29 13 55 0 15 17 32 26 15 3 44 258 05:45 PM 17 58 65 140 14 34 18 66 4 23 16 43 22 14 1 37 286 Total Volume 60 190 241 491 52 110 58 220 4 83 51 138 88 54 6 148 997 % App. Total 12.2 38.7 49.1 23.6 50 26.4 2.9 60.1 37 59.5 36.5 4.1 PHF .882 .819 .927 .877 .867 .809 .806 .833 .250 .865 .750 .802 .846 .844 .500 .841 .872 Manhattan Ave Greenwich 27th St Manhattan Ave Right 241 Thru 190 Left 60 InOut Total 229 491 720 Right58 Thru110 Left52 OutTotalIn165 220 385 Left4 Thru83 Right51 Out TotalIn248 138 386 Left88 Thru54 Right6 TotalOutIn355 148 503 Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_Semi Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 08:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 04:30 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Grand Total 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 Apprch %0 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 50 50 0 Total %0 0 20 40 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_Semi Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 08:45 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total Volume 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 3 % App. Total 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 50 0 PHF .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .250 .375 Manhattan Ave Greenwich 27th St Manhattan Ave Right1 Thru0 Left0 InOut Total1 1 2 Right0 Thru0 Left0 OutTotalIn1 0 1 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left1 Thru1 Right0 TotalOutIn1 2 3 Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM Bank 2 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_Semi Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 3 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:45 PM 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 % App. Total 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 Manhattan Ave Greenwich 27th St Manhattan Ave Right 0 Thru 0 Left 0 InOut Total 0 0 0 Right0 Thru0 Left2 OutTotalIn0 2 2 Left0 Thru0 Right0 Out TotalIn2 0 2 Left0 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 03:45 PM Bank 2 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_SUnit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 1 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 07:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 08:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 04:15 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Total 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 Grand Total 0 1 3 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 1 1 12 Apprch %0 25 75 0 100 0 33.3 66.7 0 50 25 25 Total %0 8.3 25 0 8.3 0 8.3 16.7 0 16.7 8.3 8.3 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_SUnit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 07:15 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 % App. Total 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .000 .250 .750 Manhattan Ave Greenwich 27th St Manhattan Ave Right1 Thru0 Left0 InOut Total1 1 2 Right0 Thru1 Left0 OutTotalIn0 1 1 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left1 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn2 1 3 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Bank 1 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : Man27th_SUnit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 3 Manhattan Ave Southbound 27th St Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Greenwich Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 Total Volume 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 5 % App. Total 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 100 PHF .000 .250 .250 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .250 .250 .625 Manhattan Ave Greenwich 27th St Manhattan Ave Right 1 Thru 1 Left 0 InOut Total 1 2 3 Right0 Thru0 Left0 OutTotalIn0 0 0 Left1 Thru1 Right0 Out TotalIn2 2 4 Left0 Thru0 Right1 TotalOutIn2 1 3 Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM Bank 1 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978 PHONE 626.446.2877 FAX trafsolutn@aol.com PEDESTRIAN - BICYCLE COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - ENGINEERS PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE:THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 PERIOD:AM / PM INTERSECTION:HERMOSA AVENUE / 15TH STREET FILE:4PED-BIKE 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D PERIOD A B C D 0700-0715 0 0 0 0 0700-0715 0 0 0 1 0715-0730 0 0 0 1 0715-0730 0 0 0 2 0730-0745 0 0 0 3 0730-0745 0 0 0 1 0745-0800 0 0 0 3 0745-0800 0 0 0 5 0800-0815 0 0 0 2 0800-0815 0 0 0 9 0815-0830 0 0 0 3 0815-0830 0 0 0 2 0830-0845 0 0 0 5 0830-0845 0 0 0 8 0845-0900 0 0 0 4 0845-0900 0 0 0 3 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D TOTALS PERIOD A B C D TOTALS 0700-0800 0 0 0 7 7 0700-0800 0 0 0 9 9 0715-0815 0 0 0 9 9 0715-0815 0 0 0 17 17 0730-0830 0 0 0 11 11 0730-0830 0 0 0 17 17 0745-0845 0 0 0 13 13 0745-0845 0 0 0 24 24 0800-0900 0 0 0 14 14 0800-0900 0 0 0 22 22 PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTSPEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978 PHONE 626.446.2877 FAX trafsolutn@aol.com 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D PERIOD A B C D 0400-0415 0 0 0 2 0400-0415 0 0 0 6 0415-0430 0 0 0 7 0415-0430 0 0 0 13 0430-0445 0 0 0 7 0430-0445 0 0 0 8 0445-0500 0 0 0 6 0445-0500 0 0 0 3 0500-0515 0 0 0 5 0500-0515 0 0 0 6 0515-0530 0 0 0 6 0515-0530 0 0 0 8 0530-0545 0 0 0 5 0530-0545 0 0 0 7 0545-0600 0 0 0 10 0545-0600 0 0 0 4 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D TOTALS PERIOD A B C D TOTALS 0400-0500 0 0 0 22 22 0400-0500 0 0 0 30 30 0415-0515 0 0 0 25 25 0415-0515 0 0 0 30 30 0430-0530 0 0 0 24 24 0430-0530 0 0 0 25 25 0445-0545 0 0 0 22 22 0445-0545 0 0 0 24 24 0500-0600 0 0 0 26 26 0500-0600 0 0 0 25 25 PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTSPEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 15TH STREET FILE NUMBER:4-AM CAR 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 36 1 0 0 1 0715-0730 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 57 1 4 0 4 0730-0745 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 2 0 4 0745-0800 1 37 0 0 0 0 0 99 0 2 0 2 0800-0815 1 49 0 0 0 0 0 108 3 6 0 2 0815-0830 1 53 0 0 0 0 0 103 0 2 0 2 0830-0845 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 88 2 3 0 2 0845-0900 1 44 0 0 0 0 0 77 2 0 0 2 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 2 124 0 0 0 0 0 262 2 8 0 11 409 0715-0815 3 146 0 0 0 0 0 334 4 14 0 12 513 0730-0830 4 179 0 0 0 0 0 380 3 12 0 10 588 0745-0845 3 189 0 0 0 0 0 398 5 13 0 8 616 0800-0900 3 196 0 0 0 0 0 376 7 11 0 8 601 3 189 0 5 398 0 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0745-0845 8 0 13 15TH STREET DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 15TH STREET FILE NUMBER:4-PM CAR 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 2 80 0 0 0 0 0 54 2 3 0 1 0415-0430 1 85 0 0 0 0 0 59 1 1 0 2 0430-0445 1 83 0 0 0 0 0 51 2 0 0 1 0445-0500 2 82 0 0 0 0 0 41 2 2 0 0 0500-0515 3 93 0 0 0 0 0 55 3 3 0 2 0515-0530 1 97 0 0 0 0 0 59 4 3 0 0 0530-0545 3 118 0 0 0 0 0 50 3 3 0 0 0545-0600 4 112 0 0 0 0 0 62 2 2 0 1 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 6 330 0 0 0 0 0 205 7 6 0 4 558 0415-0515 7 343 0 0 0 0 0 206 8 6 0 5 575 0430-0530 7 355 0 0 0 0 0 206 11 8 0 3 590 0445-0545 9 390 0 0 0 0 0 205 12 11 0 2 629 0500-0600 11 420 0 0 0 0 0 226 12 11 0 3 683 11 420 0 12 226 0 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0500-0600 3 0 11 15TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 15TH STREET FILE NUMBER:4-AM SMALL TRUCK 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0730-0745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0745-0800 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0800-0815 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0815-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0830-0845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0845-0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 0715-0815 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 9 0730-0830 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 10 0745-0845 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 9 0800-0900 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 8 1 2 0 0 7 0 15TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0730-0830 0 0 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 15TH STREET FILE NUMBER:4-PM SMALL TRUCK 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0415-0430 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0430-0445 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0445-0500 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0500-0515 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0515-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0530-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0545-0600 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 1 14 0415-0515 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 11 0430-0530 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 8 0445-0545 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 0500-0600 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 6 0 0 5 0 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0400-0500 1 0 1 15TH STREET DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 15TH STREET FILE NUMBER:4-AM LARGE TRUCK 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0730-0745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0745-0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0800-0815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0815-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0830-0845 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0845-0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0715-0815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0730-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0745-0845 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0800-0900 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 15TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0745-0845 0 0 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 15TH STREET FILE NUMBER:4-PM LARGE TRUCK / NO ACTIVITY OBSERVED 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0415-0430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0430-0445 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0445-0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0500-0515 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0515-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0530-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0545-0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0415-0515 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0430-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0445-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0500-0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0400-0500 0 0 0 15TH STREET DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 15TH STREET FILE NUMBER:4-AM BUS 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0730-0745 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0745-0800 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0800-0815 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0815-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0830-0845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0845-0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 0715-0815 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 0730-0830 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 0745-0845 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 0800-0900 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 0 0 5 0 15TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0730-0830 0 0 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 15TH STREET FILE NUMBER:4-PM BUS 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0415-0430 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0430-0445 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0445-0500 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0500-0515 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0515-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0530-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0545-0600 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 0415-0515 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 7 0430-0530 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 6 0445-0545 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 6 0500-0600 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0415-0515 0 0 0 15TH STREET THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978 PHONE 626.446.2877 FAX trafsolutn@aol.com PEDESTRIAN - BICYCLE COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - ENGINEERS PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE:THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 PERIOD:AM / PM INTERSECTION:HERMOSA AVENUE / 14TH STREET FILE:3PED-BIKE 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D PERIOD A B C D 0700-0715 0 0 1 0 0700-0715 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 1 0 3 0715-0730 0 0 2 1 0730-0745 1 0 2 6 0730-0745 1 5 0 1 0745-0800 1 2 6 2 0745-0800 0 0 0 4 0800-0815 1 0 2 5 0800-0815 2 3 0 9 0815-0830 2 1 4 4 0815-0830 0 5 0 2 0830-0845 7 3 3 8 0830-0845 0 6 0 6 0845-0900 2 0 3 12 0845-0900 0 9 0 2 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D TOTALS PERIOD A B C D TOTALS 0700-0800 2 3 9 11 25 0700-0800 1 5 2 6 14 0715-0815 3 3 10 16 32 0715-0815 3 8 2 15 28 0730-0830 5 3 14 17 39 0730-0830 3 13 0 16 32 0745-0845 11 6 15 19 51 0745-0845 2 14 0 21 37 0800-0900 12 4 12 29 57 0800-0900 2 23 0 19 44 PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTSPEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978 PHONE 626.446.2877 FAX trafsolutn@aol.com 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D PERIOD A B C D 0400-0415 4 2 3 8 0400-0415 2 0 0 4 0415-0430 1 2 5 11 0415-0430 0 4 1 14 0430-0445 0 2 6 7 0430-0445 0 2 2 8 0445-0500 2 1 9 7 0445-0500 0 9 0 3 0500-0515 6 3 5 5 0500-0515 0 2 0 3 0515-0530 6 10 6 6 0515-0530 0 5 1 7 0530-0545 2 4 9 10 0530-0545 0 3 0 5 0545-0600 6 9 7 16 0545-0600 1 3 0 2 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D TOTALS PERIOD A B C D TOTALS 0400-0500 7 7 23 33 70 0400-0500 2 15 3 29 49 0415-0515 9 8 25 30 72 0415-0515 0 17 3 28 48 0430-0530 14 16 26 25 81 0430-0530 0 18 3 21 42 0445-0545 16 18 29 28 91 0445-0545 0 19 1 18 38 0500-0600 20 26 27 37 110 0500-0600 1 13 1 17 32 PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTSPEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 14TH STREET FILE NUMBER:3-AM CAR 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 2 23 0 3 0 2 2 34 2 2 0 1 0715-0730 4 20 1 0 1 1 1 54 7 0 1 0 0730-0745 2 37 1 0 3 4 2 68 3 1 1 2 0745-0800 4 33 1 0 2 2 2 91 8 0 4 5 0800-0815 2 55 1 1 4 4 3 102 9 2 2 3 0815-0830 4 50 4 1 0 0 4 98 6 2 2 3 0830-0845 3 50 2 2 0 1 3 86 9 1 0 3 0845-0900 2 37 3 0 2 1 2 76 7 0 1 4 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 12 113 3 3 6 9 7 247 20 3 6 8 437 0715-0815 12 145 4 1 10 11 8 315 27 3 8 10 554 0730-0830 12 175 7 2 9 10 11 359 26 5 9 13 638 0745-0845 13 188 8 4 6 7 12 377 32 5 8 14 674 0800-0900 11 192 10 4 6 6 12 362 31 5 5 13 657 13 188 8 32 377 12 14TH STREET 6 7 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 4 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0745-0845 14 8 5 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 14TH STREET FILE NUMBER:3-PM CAR 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 5 76 4 3 2 2 3 51 7 3 0 3 0415-0430 1 86 2 3 1 5 5 53 7 2 1 0 0430-0445 2 84 1 0 2 4 7 52 5 3 1 2 0445-0500 6 69 2 2 3 5 3 37 9 7 0 2 0500-0515 4 98 2 3 6 2 2 48 12 2 2 5 0515-0530 4 96 2 6 3 2 7 50 7 3 2 3 0530-0545 3 117 4 5 2 1 3 49 10 2 2 1 0545-0600 6 100 3 3 1 3 5 59 11 4 0 2 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 14 315 9 8 8 16 18 193 28 15 2 7 633 0415-0515 13 337 7 8 12 16 17 190 33 14 4 9 660 0430-0530 16 347 7 11 14 13 19 187 33 15 5 12 679 0445-0545 17 380 10 16 14 10 15 184 38 14 6 11 715 0500-0600 17 411 11 17 12 8 17 206 40 11 6 11 767 17 411 11 40 206 17 12 8 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 17 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0500-0600 11 6 11 14TH STREET DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 14TH STREET FILE NUMBER:3-AM SMALL TRUCK 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0730-0745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0745-0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0800-0815 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0815-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0830-0845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0845-0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 6 0715-0815 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 9 0730-0830 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 0 1 11 0745-0845 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 9 0800-0900 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 1 0 0 10 1 1 0 1 6 0 1 14TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0730-0830 1 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 14TH STREET FILE NUMBER:3-PM SMALL TRUCK 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0415-0430 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0430-0445 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0445-0500 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0500-0515 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0515-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0530-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0545-0600 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 14 0415-0515 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 10 0430-0530 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 8 0445-0545 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 5 0500-0600 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 6 0 1 5 0 14TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0400-0500 0 0 1 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 14TH STREET FILE NUMBER:3-AM LARGE TRUCK 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0730-0745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0745-0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0800-0815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0815-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0830-0845 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0845-0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0715-0815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0730-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0745-0845 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0800-0900 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 14TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0745-0845 0 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 14TH STREET FILE NUMBER:3-PM LARGE TRUCK / NO ACTIVITY OBSERVED 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0415-0430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0430-0445 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0445-0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0500-0515 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0515-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0530-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0545-0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0415-0515 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0430-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0445-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0500-0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0400-0500 0 0 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 14TH STREET FILE NUMBER:3-AM BUS 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0730-0745 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0745-0800 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0800-0815 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0815-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0830-0845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0845-0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 0715-0815 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 0730-0830 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 0745-0845 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 7 0800-0900 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 5 0 14TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0730-0830 0 0 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 14TH STREET FILE NUMBER:3-PM BUS 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0415-0430 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0430-0445 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0445-0500 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0500-0515 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0515-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0530-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0545-0600 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 0415-0515 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 7 0430-0530 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 6 0445-0545 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 6 0500-0600 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0415-0515 0 0 0 14TH STREET THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978 PHONE 626.446.2877 FAX trafsolutn@aol.com PEDESTRIAN - BICYCLE COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - ENGINEERS PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE:THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 PERIOD:AM / PM INTERSECTION:HERMOSA AVENUE / 13TH STREET FILE:2PED-BIKE 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D PERIOD A B C D 0700-0715 0 0 2 15 0700-0715 0 0 1 2 0715-0730 0 0 3 15 0715-0730 0 0 0 3 0730-0745 0 0 7 24 0730-0745 0 0 0 5 0745-0800 0 0 10 26 0745-0800 0 0 0 6 0800-0815 0 0 8 23 0800-0815 0 0 1 8 0815-0830 0 0 8 25 0815-0830 0 0 0 3 0830-0845 0 0 12 43 0830-0845 0 0 1 6 0845-0900 0 0 11 51 0845-0900 0 0 0 7 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D TOTALS PERIOD A B C D TOTALS 0700-0800 0 0 22 80 102 0700-0800 0 0 1 16 17 0715-0815 0 0 28 88 116 0715-0815 0 0 1 22 23 0730-0830 0 0 33 98 131 0730-0830 0 0 1 22 23 0745-0845 0 0 38 117 155 0745-0845 0 0 2 23 25 0800-0900 0 0 39 142 181 0800-0900 0 0 2 24 26 PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTSPEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978 PHONE 626.446.2877 FAX trafsolutn@aol.com 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D PERIOD A B C D 0400-0415 0 0 7 27 0400-0415 0 0 1 2 0415-0430 0 0 11 29 0415-0430 0 0 2 14 0430-0445 0 0 9 37 0430-0445 0 0 2 10 0445-0500 0 0 10 31 0445-0500 0 0 7 12 0500-0515 0 0 20 36 0500-0515 0 0 5 10 0515-0530 0 0 15 25 0515-0530 0 0 2 16 0530-0545 0 0 16 42 0530-0545 0 0 2 15 0545-0600 0 0 11 39 0545-0600 0 0 3 9 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D TOTALS PERIOD A B C D TOTALS 0400-0500 0 0 37 124 161 0400-0500 0 0 12 38 50 0415-0515 0 0 50 133 183 0415-0515 0 0 16 46 62 0430-0530 0 0 54 129 183 0430-0530 0 0 16 48 64 0445-0545 0 0 61 134 195 0445-0545 0 0 16 53 69 0500-0600 0 0 62 142 204 0500-0600 0 0 12 50 62 PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTSPEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 13TH STREET FILE NUMBER:2-AM CAR 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 30 2 0 0 1 0715-0730 2 22 0 0 0 0 0 59 5 5 0 0 0730-0745 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 75 3 3 0 2 0745-0800 1 39 0 0 0 0 0 101 6 6 0 0 0800-0815 3 54 0 0 0 0 0 109 8 5 0 0 0815-0830 2 52 0 0 0 0 0 110 11 3 0 1 0830-0845 1 42 0 0 0 0 0 95 8 6 0 1 0845-0900 2 45 0 0 0 0 0 78 12 6 0 2 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 3 116 0 0 0 0 0 265 16 14 0 3 417 0715-0815 6 149 0 0 0 0 0 344 22 19 0 2 542 0730-0830 6 179 0 0 0 0 0 395 28 17 0 3 628 0745-0845 7 187 0 0 0 0 0 415 33 20 0 2 664 0800-0900 8 193 0 0 0 0 0 392 39 20 0 4 656 7 187 0 33 415 0 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0745-0845 2 0 20 13TH STREET DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 13TH STREET FILE NUMBER:2-PM CAR 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 2 67 0 0 0 0 0 44 2 10 0 3 0415-0430 2 99 0 0 0 0 0 69 8 17 0 4 0430-0445 5 74 0 0 0 0 0 50 4 10 0 9 0445-0500 2 90 0 0 0 0 0 49 3 7 0 5 0500-0515 6 81 0 0 0 0 0 50 7 11 0 8 0515-0530 3 110 0 0 0 0 0 66 8 11 0 8 0530-0545 5 100 0 0 0 0 0 51 13 10 0 8 0545-0600 4 118 0 0 0 0 0 62 5 15 0 5 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 11 330 0 0 0 0 0 212 17 44 0 21 635 0415-0515 15 344 0 0 0 0 0 218 22 45 0 26 670 0430-0530 16 355 0 0 0 0 0 215 22 39 0 30 677 0445-0545 16 381 0 0 0 0 0 216 31 39 0 29 712 0500-0600 18 409 0 0 0 0 0 229 33 47 0 29 765 18 409 0 33 229 0 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0500-0600 29 0 47 13TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 13TH STREET FILE NUMBER:2-AM SMALL TRUCK 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0730-0745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0745-0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0800-0815 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0815-0830 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0830-0845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0845-0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 5 0715-0815 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 7 0730-0830 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 9 0745-0845 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 8 0800-0900 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 9 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 13TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0730-0830 0 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 13TH STREET FILE NUMBER:2-PM SMALL TRUCK 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0415-0430 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0430-0445 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0445-0500 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0500-0515 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0515-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0530-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0545-0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 13 0415-0515 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 9 0430-0530 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 7 0445-0545 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 0500-0600 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 0 0 6 0 13TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0400-0500 0 0 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 13TH STREET FILE NUMBER:2-AM LARGE TRUCK 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0730-0745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0745-0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0800-0815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0815-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0830-0845 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0845-0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0715-0815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0730-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0745-0845 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0800-0900 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0800-0900 0 0 0 13TH STREET DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 13TH STREET FILE NUMBER:2-PM LARGE TRUCK / NO ACTIVITY OBSERVED 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0415-0430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0430-0445 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0445-0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0500-0515 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0515-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0530-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0545-0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0415-0515 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0430-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0445-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0500-0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0400-0500 0 0 0 13TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 13TH STREET FILE NUMBER:2-AM BUS 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0730-0745 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0745-0800 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0800-0815 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0815-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0830-0845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0845-0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 0715-0815 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 0730-0830 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 0745-0845 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 7 0800-0900 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 5 0 13TH STREET 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0730-0830 0 0 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W 13TH STREET FILE NUMBER:2-PM BUS 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0415-0430 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0430-0445 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0445-0500 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0500-0515 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0515-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0530-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0545-0600 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 0415-0515 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 7 0430-0530 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 6 0445-0545 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 6 0500-0600 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0415-0515 0 0 0 13TH STREET THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978 PHONE 626.446.2877 FAX trafsolutn@aol.com PEDESTRIAN - BICYCLE COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - ENGINEERS PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE:THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 PERIOD:AM / PM INTERSECTION:HERMOSA AVENUE / PIER AVENUE FILE:1PED-BIKE 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D PERIOD A B C D 0700-0715 2 0 6 0 0700-0715 0 1 0 0 0715-0730 8 1 7 0 0715-0730 0 3 0 0 0730-0745 7 2 7 0 0730-0745 1 4 0 0 0745-0800 11 1 14 0 0745-0800 1 2 1 0 0800-0815 13 2 8 0 0800-0815 1 4 1 0 0815-0830 12 0 6 0 0815-0830 1 5 1 0 0830-0845 15 1 3 0 0830-0845 1 5 1 0 0845-0900 15 1 7 0 0845-0900 1 10 4 0 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D TOTALS PERIOD A B C D TOTALS 0700-0800 28 4 34 0 66 0700-0800 2 10 1 0 13 0715-0815 39 6 36 0 81 0715-0815 3 13 2 0 18 0730-0830 43 5 35 0 83 0730-0830 4 15 3 0 22 0745-0845 51 4 31 0 86 0745-0845 4 16 4 0 24 0800-0900 55 4 24 0 83 0800-0900 4 24 7 0 35 PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTSPEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 626.446.7978 PHONE 626.446.2877 FAX trafsolutn@aol.com 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 15-MINUTE NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D PERIOD A B C D 0400-0415 33 8 34 0 0400-0415 0 1 4 0 0415-0430 34 5 34 0 0415-0430 1 4 8 0 0430-0445 36 5 41 0 0430-0445 4 2 6 0 0445-0500 45 4 51 0 0445-0500 2 5 3 0 0500-0515 29 3 46 0 0500-0515 4 5 4 0 0515-0530 38 8 42 0 0515-0530 3 4 7 0 0530-0545 38 9 48 0 0530-0545 2 2 5 0 0545-0600 24 4 39 0 0545-0600 3 1 5 0 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG 1-HOUR NORTH LEG EAST LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG PERIOD A B C D TOTALS PERIOD A B C D TOTALS 0400-0500 148 22 160 0 330 0400-0500 7 12 21 0 40 0415-0515 144 17 172 0 333 0415-0515 11 16 21 0 48 0430-0530 148 20 180 0 348 0430-0530 13 16 20 0 49 0445-0545 150 24 187 0 361 0445-0545 11 16 19 0 46 0500-0600 129 24 175 0 328 0500-0600 12 12 21 0 45 PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTS BICYCLIST MOVEMENTSPEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W PIER AVENUE FILE NUMBER:1-AM CAR 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 16 7 10 0 7 8 30 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 20 9 11 0 8 14 53 0 0 0 0 0730-0745 0 23 17 12 0 10 22 72 0 0 0 0 0745-0800 0 27 16 18 0 13 20 84 0 0 0 0 0800-0815 0 36 14 20 0 9 19 100 0 0 0 0 0815-0830 0 49 12 22 0 14 25 101 0 0 0 0 0830-0845 0 44 14 23 0 19 17 86 0 0 0 0 0845-0900 0 34 16 21 0 17 17 64 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 0 86 49 51 0 38 64 239 0 0 0 0 527 0715-0815 0 106 56 61 0 40 75 309 0 0 0 0 647 0730-0830 0 135 59 72 0 46 86 357 0 0 0 0 755 0745-0845 0 156 56 83 0 55 81 371 0 0 0 0 802 0800-0900 0 163 56 86 0 59 78 351 0 0 0 0 793 0 156 56 0 371 81 0 55 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 83 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0745-0845 0 0 0 PIER AVENUE DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W PIER AVENUE FILE NUMBER:1-PM CAR 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 0 63 20 17 0 22 21 38 0 0 0 0 0415-0430 0 75 33 23 0 20 23 40 0 0 0 0 0430-0445 0 77 26 22 0 24 18 33 0 0 0 0 0445-0500 0 68 20 20 0 17 22 42 0 0 0 0 0500-0515 0 75 21 23 0 18 23 45 0 0 0 0 0515-0530 0 91 20 19 0 17 15 40 0 0 0 0 0530-0545 0 97 21 21 0 21 22 44 0 0 0 0 0545-0600 0 99 27 20 0 22 23 54 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 0 283 99 82 0 83 84 153 0 0 0 0 784 0415-0515 0 295 100 88 0 79 86 160 0 0 0 0 808 0430-0530 0 311 87 84 0 76 78 160 0 0 0 0 796 0445-0545 0 331 82 83 0 73 82 171 0 0 0 0 822 0500-0600 0 362 89 83 0 78 83 183 0 0 0 0 878 0 362 89 0 183 83 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0500-0600 0 0 0 PIER AVENUE 0 78 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 83 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W PIER AVENUE FILE NUMBER:1-AM SMALL TRUCK 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0730-0745 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0745-0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0800-0815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0815-0830 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0830-0845 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0845-0900 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 7 0715-0815 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 8 0730-0830 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 9 0745-0845 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 9 0800-0900 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 1 0 5 0 PIER AVENUE 0 1 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 2 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0800-0900 0 0 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W PIER AVENUE FILE NUMBER:1-PM SMALL TRUCK 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0415-0430 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0430-0445 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0445-0500 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0500-0515 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0515-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0530-0545 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0545-0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 0 3 4 2 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 14 0415-0515 0 2 3 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 9 0430-0530 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0445-0545 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0500-0600 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 4 0 4 0 0 1 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 2 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0400-0500 0 0 0 PIER AVENUE DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W PIER AVENUE FILE NUMBER:1-AM LARGE TRUCK 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0730-0745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0745-0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0800-0815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0815-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0830-0845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0845-0900 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0715-0815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0730-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0745-0845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0800-0900 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0800-0900 0 0 0 PIER AVENUE DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W PIER AVENUE FILE NUMBER:1-PM LARGE TRUCK / NO ACTIVITY OBSERVED 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0415-0430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0430-0445 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0445-0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0500-0515 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0515-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0530-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0545-0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0415-0515 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0430-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0445-0545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0500-0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0400-0500 0 0 0 PIER AVENUE 0 0 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:07:00 AM TO 09:00 AM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W PIER AVENUE FILE NUMBER:1-AM BUS 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0700-0715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0715-0730 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0730-0745 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0745-0800 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0800-0815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0815-0830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0830-0845 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0845-0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0700-0800 0 3 0 0 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 10 0715-0815 0 3 0 0 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 10 0730-0830 0 3 0 0 0 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 12 0745-0845 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 11 0800-0900 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 0 0 6 2 0 1 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 HERMOSA AVENUE A.M. PEAK HOUR 0730-0830 0 0 0 PIER AVENUE DATA PROVIDED BY: THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION 329 DIAMOND STREET ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91005 PH: 626-446-7978 FAX: 626-446-2877 . INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT:LLG - PASADENA PROJECT:HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL PROJECT - HERMOSA BEACH DATE: PERIOD:04:00 PM TO 06:00 PM INTERSECTION N/S HERMOSA AVENUE E/W PIER AVENUE FILE NUMBER:1-PM BUS 15 MINUTE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT 0400-0415 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0415-0430 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0430-0445 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0445-0500 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0500-0515 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0515-0530 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0530-0545 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0545-0600 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTALS SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT NBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH EBLT TOTALS 0400-0500 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 0415-0515 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 9 0430-0530 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 7 0445-0545 0 3 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 9 0500-0600 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 8 0 4 0 0 3 1 HERMOSA AVENUE P.M. PEAK HOUR 0415-0515 0 0 0 PIER AVENUE 0 1 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 01, 2012 0 File Name : ManPierE_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 1 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds Thru Peds Thru Peds Thru Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 2 0 0 8 0 22 0 0 32 07:15 AM 2 0 0 4 0 11 0 0 17 07:30 AM 1 0 2 9 0 11 0 0 23 07:45 AM 1 0 0 7 0 22 0 1 31 Total 6 0 2 28 0 66 0 1 103 08:00 AM 0 0 0 9 0 21 0 1 31 08:15 AM 4 0 0 11 0 18 0 0 33 08:30 AM 1 0 0 10 0 21 0 0 32 08:45 AM 4 0 1 9 0 22 0 0 36 Total 9 0 1 39 0 82 0 1 132 Grand Total 15 0 3 67 0 148 0 2 235 Apprch %100 0 4.3 95.7 0 100 0 100 Total %6.4 0 1.3 28.5 0 63 0 0.9 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierE_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 9 9 0 21 21 0 1 1 31 08:15 AM 4 0 4 0 11 11 0 18 18 0 0 0 33 08:30 AM 1 0 1 0 10 10 0 21 21 0 0 0 32 08:45 AM 4 0 4 1 9 10 0 22 22 0 0 0 36 Total Volume 9 0 9 1 39 40 0 82 82 0 1 1 132 % App. Total 100 0 2.5 97.5 0 100 0 100 PHF .563 .000 .563 .250 .886 .909 .000 .932 .932 .000 .250 .250 .917 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (E leg) Pier Ave (E leg) Manhattan Ave Thru9 Peds0 InOut Total0 9 9 Thru1 Peds39 OutTotalIn0 40 40 Thru 0 Peds 82 Out TotalIn 9 82 91 Thru0 Peds1 TotalOutIn1 1 2 Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM Bank 1 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierE_Bus Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Total 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 7 Apprch %0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 Total %0 0 0 0 57.1 0 0 0 0 0 42.9 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierE_Bus Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 5 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .625 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (E leg) Pier Ave (E leg) Manhattan Ave Right0 Thru0 Left0 InOut Total0 0 0 Right0 Thru3 Left0 OutTotalIn2 3 5 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left0 Thru2 Right0 TotalOutIn3 2 5 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierE_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 7 0 5 0 24 10 0 0 0 17 28 0 91 07:15 AM 8 0 3 0 31 8 0 0 0 9 35 0 94 07:30 AM 12 0 1 0 36 7 0 0 0 7 45 0 108 07:45 AM 15 0 4 0 33 9 0 0 0 16 49 0 126 Total 42 0 13 0 124 34 0 0 0 49 157 0 419 08:00 AM 12 0 4 0 35 9 0 0 0 16 57 0 133 08:15 AM 11 0 7 0 37 13 0 0 0 18 38 0 124 08:30 AM 6 0 5 0 43 15 0 0 0 11 39 0 119 08:45 AM 14 0 5 0 41 16 0 0 0 6 61 0 143 Total 43 0 21 0 156 53 0 0 0 51 195 0 519 Grand Total 85 0 34 0 280 87 0 0 0 100 352 0 938 Apprch %71.4 0 28.6 0 76.3 23.7 0 0 0 22.1 77.9 0 Total %9.1 0 3.6 0 29.9 9.3 0 0 0 10.7 37.5 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierE_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM 08:00 AM 12 0 4 16 0 35 9 44 0 0 0 0 16 57 0 73 133 08:15 AM 11 0 7 18 0 37 13 50 0 0 0 0 18 38 0 56 124 08:30 AM 6 0 5 11 0 43 15 58 0 0 0 0 11 39 0 50 119 08:45 AM 14 0 5 19 0 41 16 57 0 0 0 0 6 61 0 67 143 Total Volume 43 0 21 64 0 156 53 209 0 0 0 0 51 195 0 246 519 % App. Total 67.2 0 32.8 0 74.6 25.4 0 0 0 20.7 79.3 0 PHF .768 .000 .750 .842 .000 .907 .828 .901 .000 .000 .000 .000 .708 .799 .000 .842 .907 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (E leg) Pier Ave (E leg) Manhattan Ave Right21 Thru0 Left43 InOut Total104 64 168 Right53 Thru156 Left0 OutTotalIn238 209 447 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left51 Thru195 Right0 TotalOutIn177 246 423 Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierE_Semi Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Apprch %0 0 0 0 75 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total %0 0 0 0 75 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierE_Semi Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .375 .000 .375 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .375 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (E leg) Pier Ave (E leg) Manhattan Ave Right0 Thru0 Left0 InOut Total0 0 0 Right0 Thru3 Left0 OutTotalIn0 3 3 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left0 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn3 0 3 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Bank 2 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierE_SUnit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 1 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 07:30 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 Total 0 0 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 12 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 08:15 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 08:45 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Total 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 9 Grand Total 3 0 1 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 8 0 21 Apprch %75 0 25 0 77.8 22.2 0 0 0 0 100 0 Total %14.3 0 4.8 0 33.3 9.5 0 0 0 0 38.1 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierE_SUnit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 07:30 AM 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 6 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Total Volume 0 0 1 1 0 6 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 14 % App. Total 0 0 100 0 75 25 0 0 0 0 100 0 PHF .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .375 .500 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .625 .000 .625 .583 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (E leg) Pier Ave (E leg) Manhattan Ave Right1 Thru0 Left0 InOut Total2 1 3 Right2 Thru6 Left0 OutTotalIn5 8 13 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left0 Thru5 Right0 TotalOutIn7 5 12 Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM Bank 1 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : PM_ManPierE_SUnit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 1 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 05:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Grand Total 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 Apprch %100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 Total %20 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : PM_ManPierE_SUnit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:00 PM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total Volume 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 5 % App. Total 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 PHF .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .625 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (E leg) Pier Ave (E leg) Right0 Thru0 Left1 InOut Total0 1 1 Right0 Thru2 Left0 OutTotalIn3 2 5 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left0 Thru2 Right0 TotalOutIn2 2 4 Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM Bank 1 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : PM_ManPierE_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds Thru Peds Thru Peds Thru Peds Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 10 0 0 12 04:15 PM 0 0 1 1 6 9 0 0 17 04:30 PM 0 0 1 4 3 22 0 0 30 04:45 PM 0 0 1 2 1 11 0 0 15 Total 0 0 3 9 10 52 0 0 74 05:00 PM 0 0 0 4 6 15 1 0 26 05:15 PM 0 0 0 1 1 12 0 0 14 05:30 PM 0 0 0 2 3 25 0 0 30 05:45 PM 0 0 1 7 3 23 1 0 35 Total 0 0 1 14 13 75 2 0 105 Grand Total 0 0 4 23 23 127 2 0 179 Apprch %0 0 14.8 85.2 15.3 84.7 100 0 Total %0 0 2.2 12.8 12.8 70.9 1.1 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : PM_ManPierE_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 4 4 6 15 21 1 0 1 26 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 12 13 0 0 0 14 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 25 28 0 0 0 30 05:45 PM 0 0 0 1 7 8 3 23 26 1 0 1 35 Total Volume 0 0 0 1 14 15 13 75 88 2 0 2 105 % App. Total 0 0 6.7 93.3 14.8 85.2 100 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .250 .500 .469 .542 .750 .786 .500 .000 .500 .750 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (E leg) Pier Ave (E leg) Thru0 Peds0 InOut Total13 0 13 Thru1 Peds14 OutTotalIn2 15 17 Thru 13 Peds 75 Out TotalIn 0 88 88 Thru2 Peds0 TotalOutIn1 2 3 Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM Bank 2 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : PM_ManPierE_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 04:00 PM 5 0 13 0 60 9 0 0 0 3 52 0 142 04:15 PM 17 0 12 0 43 15 0 0 0 7 58 0 152 04:30 PM 14 0 12 0 45 8 0 0 0 6 52 0 137 04:45 PM 8 0 12 0 44 23 0 0 0 4 50 0 141 Total 44 0 49 0 192 55 0 0 0 20 212 0 572 05:00 PM 15 0 10 0 47 14 0 0 0 5 44 0 135 05:15 PM 16 0 13 0 62 13 0 0 0 4 52 0 160 05:30 PM 16 0 13 0 63 14 0 0 0 4 51 0 161 05:45 PM 12 0 29 0 64 27 0 0 0 11 47 0 190 Total 59 0 65 0 236 68 0 0 0 24 194 0 646 Grand Total 103 0 114 0 428 123 0 0 0 44 406 0 1218 Apprch %47.5 0 52.5 0 77.7 22.3 0 0 0 9.8 90.2 0 Total %8.5 0 9.4 0 35.1 10.1 0 0 0 3.6 33.3 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : PM_ManPierE_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (E leg) Westbound Northbound Pier Ave (E leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 15 0 10 25 0 47 14 61 0 0 0 0 5 44 0 49 135 05:15 PM 16 0 13 29 0 62 13 75 0 0 0 0 4 52 0 56 160 05:30 PM 16 0 13 29 0 63 14 77 0 0 0 0 4 51 0 55 161 05:45 PM 12 0 29 41 0 64 27 91 0 0 0 0 11 47 0 58 190 Total Volume 59 0 65 124 0 236 68 304 0 0 0 0 24 194 0 218 646 % App. Total 47.6 0 52.4 0 77.6 22.4 0 0 0 11 89 0 PHF .922 .000 .560 .756 .000 .922 .630 .835 .000 .000 .000 .000 .545 .933 .000 .940 .850 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (E leg) Pier Ave (E leg) Right65 Thru0 Left59 InOut Total92 124 216 Right68 Thru236 Left0 OutTotalIn253 304 557 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left24 Thru194 Right0 TotalOutIn301 218 519 Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierW_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 1 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds Thru Peds Thru Peds Thru Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 07:15 AM 1 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 07:30 AM 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 07:45 AM 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 2 23 Total 3 43 0 0 0 0 1 4 51 08:00 AM 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 08:15 AM 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 08:30 AM 1 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 12 08:45 AM 1 7 0 2 0 0 0 1 11 Total 5 40 0 4 0 0 0 3 52 Grand Total 8 83 0 4 0 0 1 7 103 Apprch %8.8 91.2 0 100 0 0 12.5 87.5 Total %7.8 80.6 0 3.9 0 0 1 6.8 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierW_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 1 20 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 23 08:00 AM 0 13 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 14 08:15 AM 3 11 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 15 08:30 AM 1 9 10 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Total Volume 5 53 58 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 64 % App. Total 8.6 91.4 0 100 0 0 0 100 PHF .417 .663 .690 .000 .250 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .500 .696 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (W leg) Pier Ave (W leg) Manhattan Ave Thru5 Peds53 InOut Total0 58 58 Thru0 Peds2 OutTotalIn0 2 2 Thru 0 Peds 0 Out TotalIn 5 0 5 Thru0 Peds4 TotalOutIn0 4 4 Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM Bank 1 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierW_Bus Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Total 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 8 Apprch %0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 75 25 Total %0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 37.5 12.5 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierW_Bus Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:30 AM - Peak 1 of 1 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierW_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 5 25 0 1 0 23 0 22 1 77 07:15 AM 0 0 0 6 28 0 3 0 18 0 25 1 81 07:30 AM 0 0 0 2 35 0 0 0 22 0 31 2 92 07:45 AM 0 0 0 10 27 0 1 0 26 0 38 2 104 Total 0 0 0 23 115 0 5 0 89 0 116 6 354 08:00 AM 0 0 0 6 35 0 1 0 21 0 54 1 118 08:15 AM 0 0 0 10 38 0 1 0 18 0 38 1 106 08:30 AM 0 0 0 9 38 0 0 0 19 0 32 5 103 08:45 AM 0 0 0 4 42 0 3 0 15 0 52 2 118 Total 0 0 0 29 153 0 5 0 73 0 176 9 445 Grand Total 0 0 0 52 268 0 10 0 162 0 292 15 799 Apprch %0 0 0 16.2 83.8 0 5.8 0 94.2 0 95.1 4.9 Total %0 0 0 6.5 33.5 0 1.3 0 20.3 0 36.5 1.9 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierW_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 6 35 0 41 1 0 21 22 0 54 1 55 118 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 10 38 0 48 1 0 18 19 0 38 1 39 106 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 9 38 0 47 0 0 19 19 0 32 5 37 103 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 4 42 0 46 3 0 15 18 0 52 2 54 118 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 29 153 0 182 5 0 73 78 0 176 9 185 445 % App. Total 0 0 0 15.9 84.1 0 6.4 0 93.6 0 95.1 4.9 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .725 .911 .000 .948 .417 .000 .869 .886 .000 .815 .450 .841 .943 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (W leg) Pier Ave (W leg) Manhattan Ave Right0 Thru0 Left0 InOut Total0 0 0 Right0 Thru153 Left29 OutTotalIn249 182 431 Left 5 Thru 0 Right 73 Out TotalIn 38 78 116 Left0 Thru176 Right9 TotalOutIn158 185 343 Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierW_Semi Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:15 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Grand Total 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Apprch %0 0 0 33.3 66.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total %0 0 0 33.3 66.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierW_Semi Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:30 AM - Peak 1 of 1 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierW_SUnit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 1 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 Total 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 11 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 5 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 16 Apprch %0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 87.5 12.5 Total %0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 43.8 6.2 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : ManPierW_SUnit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/7/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:30 AM - Peak 1 of 1 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : PM_ManPierEW_Bus Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (Both legs) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (Both legs) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 12 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 05:15 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Total 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 6 Grand Total 1 1 0 0 8 1 0 0 1 0 6 0 18 Apprch %50 50 0 0 88.9 11.1 0 0 100 0 100 0 Total %5.6 5.6 0 0 44.4 5.6 0 0 5.6 0 33.3 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : PM_ManPierEW_Bus Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (Both legs) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (Both legs) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 12 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 87.5 12.5 0 0 0 0 100 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .292 .250 .286 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .429 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (Both legs) Pier Ave (Both legs) Manhattan Ave Right0 Thru0 Left0 InOut Total1 0 1 Right1 Thru7 Left0 OutTotalIn4 8 12 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left0 Thru4 Right0 TotalOutIn7 4 11 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : PM_ManPierW_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 1 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds Thru Peds Thru Peds Thru Peds Int. Total 04:00 PM 1 18 1 2 0 0 0 0 22 04:15 PM 4 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 04:30 PM 0 35 5 0 0 0 0 0 40 04:45 PM 6 34 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 Total 11 111 7 2 0 0 0 0 131 05:00 PM 3 36 4 1 0 0 0 0 44 05:15 PM 3 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 29 05:30 PM 2 39 3 2 0 0 0 0 46 05:45 PM 5 19 8 0 0 0 0 0 32 Total 13 119 16 3 0 0 0 0 151 Grand Total 24 230 23 5 0 0 0 0 282 Apprch %9.4 90.6 82.1 17.9 0 0 0 0 Total %8.5 81.6 8.2 1.8 0 0 0 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : PM_ManPierW_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 6 34 40 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 05:00 PM 3 36 39 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 05:15 PM 3 25 28 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 05:30 PM 2 39 41 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 Total Volume 14 134 148 9 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 % App. Total 9.5 90.5 75 25 0 0 0 0 PHF .583 .859 .902 .563 .375 .600 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .870 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (W leg) Pier Ave (W leg) Manhattan Ave Thru14 Peds134 InOut Total0 148 148 Thru9 Peds3 OutTotalIn0 12 12 Thru 0 Peds 0 Out TotalIn 14 0 14 Thru0 Peds0 TotalOutIn9 0 9 Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM Bank 1 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : PM_ManPierW_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 24 50 0 1 0 10 0 48 3 136 04:15 PM 0 0 0 15 41 0 0 0 15 0 47 4 122 04:30 PM 0 0 0 19 38 0 0 0 3 0 54 4 118 04:45 PM 0 0 0 20 37 0 0 0 8 0 43 5 113 Total 0 0 0 78 166 0 1 0 36 0 192 16 489 05:00 PM 0 0 0 18 39 0 0 0 6 0 43 1 107 05:15 PM 0 0 0 23 54 0 0 0 9 0 47 3 136 05:30 PM 0 0 0 21 56 0 1 0 13 0 42 3 136 05:45 PM 0 0 0 25 67 0 0 0 10 0 48 3 153 Total 0 0 0 87 216 0 1 0 38 0 180 10 532 Grand Total 0 0 0 165 382 0 2 0 74 0 372 26 1021 Apprch %0 0 0 30.2 69.8 0 2.6 0 97.4 0 93.5 6.5 Total %0 0 0 16.2 37.4 0 0.2 0 7.2 0 36.4 2.5 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : PM_ManPierW_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 18 39 0 57 0 0 6 6 0 43 1 44 107 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 23 54 0 77 0 0 9 9 0 47 3 50 136 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 21 56 0 77 1 0 13 14 0 42 3 45 136 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 25 67 0 92 0 0 10 10 0 48 3 51 153 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 87 216 0 303 1 0 38 39 0 180 10 190 532 % App. Total 0 0 0 28.7 71.3 0 2.6 0 97.4 0 94.7 5.3 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .870 .806 .000 .823 .250 .000 .731 .696 .000 .938 .833 .931 .869 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (W leg) Pier Ave (W leg) Manhattan Ave Right0 Thru0 Left0 InOut Total0 0 0 Right0 Thru216 Left87 OutTotalIn218 303 521 Left 1 Thru 0 Right 38 Out TotalIn 97 39 136 Left0 Thru180 Right10 TotalOutIn217 190 407 Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : pm_manpierw_sunit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 1 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 Apprch %0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 Total %0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 25 0 25 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : pm_manpierw_sunit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Manhattan Ave Southbound Pier Ave (W leg) Westbound Manhattan Ave Northbound Pier Ave (W leg) Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 4 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .500 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave (W leg) Pier Ave (W leg) Manhattan Ave Right0 Thru0 Left0 InOut Total0 0 0 Right0 Thru2 Left0 OutTotalIn2 2 4 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 1 Out TotalIn 0 1 1 Left0 Thru1 Right0 TotalOutIn2 1 3 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Bank 1 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 1 Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds Thru Peds Thru Peds Thru Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 6 0 2 1 5 0 1 15 07:15 AM 0 7 0 0 3 4 0 1 15 07:30 AM 0 9 0 4 0 10 0 0 23 07:45 AM 0 14 0 5 1 14 0 5 39 Total 0 36 0 11 5 33 0 7 92 08:00 AM 1 5 0 3 1 17 0 1 28 08:15 AM 1 9 0 0 1 10 0 0 21 08:30 AM 0 12 0 3 0 17 0 2 34 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Total 2 26 0 6 3 44 0 3 84 04:00 PM 2 27 0 1 3 10 0 1 44 04:15 PM 11 17 0 0 3 9 1 4 45 04:30 PM 7 21 1 5 3 22 0 0 59 04:45 PM 5 24 0 1 2 11 0 6 49 Total 25 89 1 7 11 52 1 11 197 05:00 PM 6 24 1 4 9 15 1 3 63 05:15 PM 8 26 0 1 1 12 2 3 53 05:30 PM 2 22 0 3 5 25 0 2 59 05:45 PM 5 20 0 8 4 23 0 5 65 Total 21 92 1 16 19 75 3 13 240 Grand Total 48 243 2 40 38 204 4 34 613 Apprch %16.5 83.5 4.8 95.2 15.7 84.3 10.5 89.5 Total %7.8 39.6 0.3 6.5 6.2 33.3 0.7 5.5 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 0 14 14 0 5 5 1 14 15 0 5 5 39 08:00 AM 1 5 6 0 3 3 1 17 18 0 1 1 28 08:15 AM 1 9 10 0 0 0 1 10 11 0 0 0 21 08:30 AM 0 12 12 0 3 3 0 17 17 0 2 2 34 Total Volume 2 40 42 0 11 11 3 58 61 0 8 8 122 % App. Total 4.8 95.2 0 100 4.9 95.1 0 100 PHF .500 .714 .750 .000 .550 .550 .750 .853 .847 .000 .400 .400 .782 Monterey Blvd Pier Ave Pier Ave Monterey Blvd Thru2 Peds40 InOut Total3 42 45 Thru0 Peds11 OutTotalIn0 11 11 Thru 3 Peds 58 Out TotalIn 2 61 63 Thru0 Peds8 TotalOutIn0 8 8 Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM Bank 1 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_BP Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 3 Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Thru Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 6 24 30 1 4 5 9 15 24 1 3 4 63 05:15 PM 8 26 34 0 1 1 1 12 13 2 3 5 53 05:30 PM 2 22 24 0 3 3 5 25 30 0 2 2 59 05:45 PM 5 20 25 0 8 8 4 23 27 0 5 5 65 Total Volume 21 92 113 1 16 17 19 75 94 3 13 16 240 % App. Total 18.6 81.4 5.9 94.1 20.2 79.8 18.8 81.2 PHF .656 .885 .831 .250 .500 .531 .528 .750 .783 .375 .650 .800 .923 Monterey Blvd Pier Ave Pier Ave Monterey Blvd Thru 21 Peds 92 InOut Total 19 113 132 Thru1 Peds16 OutTotalIn3 17 20 Thru19 Peds75 Out TotalIn21 94 115 Thru3 Peds13 TotalOutIn1 16 17 Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM Bank 1 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_Bus Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Total 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 04:15 PM 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 12 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 Grand Total 0 0 1 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 23 Apprch %0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 Total %0 0 4.3 0 52.2 0 0 0 0 0 43.5 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_Bus Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .500 Monterey Blvd Pier Ave Pier Ave Monterey Blvd Right0 Thru0 Left0 InOut Total0 0 0 Right0 Thru2 Left0 OutTotalIn2 2 4 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left0 Thru2 Right0 TotalOutIn2 2 4 Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_Bus Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 3 Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 04:15 PM 0 0 1 1 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Total Volume 0 0 1 1 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 12 % App. Total 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 PHF .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .292 .000 .292 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .429 Monterey Blvd Pier Ave Pier Ave Monterey Blvd Right 1 Thru 0 Left 0 InOut Total 0 1 1 Right0 Thru7 Left0 OutTotalIn4 7 11 Left0 Thru0 Right0 Out TotalIn0 0 0 Left0 Thru4 Right0 TotalOutIn8 4 12 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 2 4 0 1 24 1 3 11 6 3 24 1 80 07:15 AM 1 5 1 0 23 2 4 15 7 3 29 1 91 07:30 AM 6 4 0 2 25 1 3 13 10 2 48 4 118 07:45 AM 10 10 0 3 36 6 5 24 13 4 62 1 174 Total 19 23 1 6 108 10 15 63 36 12 163 7 463 08:00 AM 10 11 0 5 47 19 1 29 17 5 60 6 210 08:15 AM 9 14 1 2 41 18 3 22 7 2 41 2 162 08:30 AM 3 5 1 4 47 7 0 20 9 3 41 4 144 08:45 AM 10 8 1 2 40 4 1 15 11 4 41 3 140 Total 32 38 3 13 175 48 5 86 44 14 183 15 656 04:00 PM 16 13 2 11 61 15 3 21 11 4 47 4 208 04:15 PM 14 16 0 12 47 8 3 19 6 1 65 2 193 04:30 PM 14 13 3 8 49 26 2 13 8 3 61 3 203 04:45 PM 11 11 2 10 54 9 6 17 12 2 49 4 187 Total 55 53 7 41 211 58 14 70 37 10 222 13 791 05:00 PM 5 13 2 7 62 15 8 21 15 1 66 9 224 05:15 PM 12 24 3 11 55 11 7 22 7 3 52 1 208 05:30 PM 10 17 3 3 66 18 4 24 13 2 57 3 220 05:45 PM 9 9 5 6 76 15 8 29 4 0 59 3 223 Total 36 63 13 27 259 59 27 96 39 6 234 16 875 Grand Total 142 177 24 87 753 175 61 315 156 42 802 51 2785 Apprch %41.4 51.6 7 8.6 74.2 17.2 11.5 59.2 29.3 4.7 89.6 5.7 Total %5.1 6.4 0.9 3.1 27 6.3 2.2 11.3 5.6 1.5 28.8 1.8 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 10 10 0 20 3 36 6 45 5 24 13 42 4 62 1 67 174 08:00 AM 10 11 0 21 5 47 19 71 1 29 17 47 5 60 6 71 210 08:15 AM 9 14 1 24 2 41 18 61 3 22 7 32 2 41 2 45 162 08:30 AM 3 5 1 9 4 47 7 58 0 20 9 29 3 41 4 48 144 Total Volume 32 40 2 74 14 171 50 235 9 95 46 150 14 204 13 231 690 % App. Total 43.2 54.1 2.7 6 72.8 21.3 6 63.3 30.7 6.1 88.3 5.6 PHF .800 .714 .500 .771 .700 .910 .658 .827 .450 .819 .676 .798 .700 .823 .542 .813 .821 Monterey Blvd Pier Ave Pier Ave Monterey Blvd Right2 Thru40 Left32 InOut Total159 74 233 Right50 Thru171 Left14 OutTotalIn282 235 517 Left 9 Thru 95 Right 46 Out TotalIn 67 150 217 Left14 Thru204 Right13 TotalOutIn182 231 413 Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_Cars Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 3 Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 5 13 2 20 7 62 15 84 8 21 15 44 1 66 9 76 224 05:15 PM 12 24 3 39 11 55 11 77 7 22 7 36 3 52 1 56 208 05:30 PM 10 17 3 30 3 66 18 87 4 24 13 41 2 57 3 62 220 05:45 PM 9 9 5 23 6 76 15 97 8 29 4 41 0 59 3 62 223 Total Volume 36 63 13 112 27 259 59 345 27 96 39 162 6 234 16 256 875 % App. Total 32.1 56.2 11.6 7.8 75.1 17.1 16.7 59.3 24.1 2.3 91.4 6.2 PHF .750 .656 .650 .718 .614 .852 .819 .889 .844 .828 .650 .920 .500 .886 .444 .842 .977 Monterey Blvd Pier Ave Pier Ave Monterey Blvd Right 13 Thru 63 Left 36 InOut Total 161 112 273 Right59 Thru259 Left27 OutTotalIn309 345 654 Left27 Thru96 Right39 Out TotalIn106 162 268 Left6 Thru234 Right16 TotalOutIn299 256 555 Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM Unshifted Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_Semi Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 2 Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Apprch %0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total %0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_Semi Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 Monterey Blvd Pier Ave Pier Ave Monterey Blvd Right0 Thru0 Left0 InOut Total0 0 0 Right0 Thru1 Left0 OutTotalIn0 1 1 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left0 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn1 0 1 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Bank 2 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_Semi Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 3 Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Monterey Blvd Pier Ave Pier Ave Monterey Blvd Right 0 Thru 0 Left 0 InOut Total 0 0 0 Right0 Thru0 Left0 OutTotalIn0 0 0 Left0 Thru0 Right0 Out TotalIn0 0 0 Left0 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn0 0 0 Peak Hour Begins at 12:00 PM Bank 2 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_SUnit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Bank 1 Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 Total 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 04:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 Total 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 5 05:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Grand Total 2 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 1 0 5 0 15 Apprch %100 0 0 0 85.7 14.3 0 0 100 0 100 0 Total %13.3 0 0 0 40 6.7 0 0 6.7 0 33.3 0 CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_SUnit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 2 Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 6 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .375 .000 .375 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .500 Monterey Blvd Pier Ave Pier Ave Monterey Blvd Right0 Thru0 Left0 InOut Total0 0 0 Right0 Thru3 Left0 OutTotalIn3 3 6 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Out TotalIn 0 0 0 Left0 Thru3 Right0 TotalOutIn3 3 6 Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM Bank 1 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com File Name : MontPier_SUnit Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 11/1/2012 Page No : 3 Monterey Blvd Southbound Pier Ave Westbound Monterey Blvd Northbound Pier Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 04:45 PM 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 Total Volume 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 5 % App. Total 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 PHF .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 .417 Monterey Blvd Pier Ave Pier Ave Monterey Blvd Right 0 Thru 0 Left 1 InOut Total 0 1 1 Right0 Thru2 Left0 OutTotalIn3 2 5 Left0 Thru0 Right1 Out TotalIn0 1 1 Left0 Thru1 Right0 TotalOutIn2 1 3 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Bank 1 Peak Hour Data North CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 626.447.4171 www.ctcounters.com LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\Appendix Covers.doc APPENDIX B INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DATA WORKSHEETS INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) DESCRIPTION Level of Service is a term used to describe prevailing conditions and their effect on traffic. Broadly interpreted, the Levels of Service concept denotes any one of a number of differing combinations of operating conditions which may occur as a roadway is accommodating various traffic volumes. Level of Service is a qualitative measure of the effect of such factors as travel speed, travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience. Six Levels of Service, A through F, have been defined in the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research Board. Level of Service A describes a condition of free flow, with low traffic volumes and relatively high speeds, while Level of Service F describes forced traffic flow at low speeds with jammed conditions and queues which cannot clear during the green phases. The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method of intersection capacity analysis has been used in our studies. It directly relates traffic demand and available capacity for key intersection movements, regardless of present signal timing, The capacity per hour of green time for each approach is calculated based on the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual. The proportion of total signal time needed by each key movement is determined and compared to the total time available (100 percent of the hour). The result of summing the requirements of the conflicting key movements plus an allowance for clearance times is expressed as a decimal fraction. Conflicting key traffic movements are those opposing movements whose combined green time requirements are greatest. The resulting ICU represents the proportion of the total hour required to accommodate intersection demand volumes if the key conflicting traffic movements are operating at capacity. Other movements may be operating near capacity, or may be operating at significantly better levels. The ICU may be translated to a Level of Service as tabulated below. The Levels of Service (abbreviated from the Highway Capacity Manual) are listed here with their corresponding ICU and Load Factor equivalents. Load Factor is that proportion of the signal cycles during the peak hour which are fully loaded; i.e. when all of the vehicles waiting at the beginning of green are not able to clear on that green phase. Intersection Capacity Utilization Characteristics Level of Service Load Factor Equivalent ICU A 0.0 0.00 - 0.60 B 0.0 - 0.1 0.61 - 0.70 C 0.1 - 0.3 0.71 - 0.80 D 0.3 - 0.7 0.81 - 0.90 E 0.7 - 1.0 0.91 - 1.00 F Not Applicable Not Applicable SERVICE LEVEL A There are no loaded cycles and few are even close to loaded at this service level. No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. SERVICE LEVEL B This level represents stable operation where an occasional approach phase is fully utilized and a substantial number are approaching full use. Many drivers begin to feel restricted within platoons of vehicles. SERVICE LEVEL C At this level stable operation continues. Loading is still intermittent but more frequent than at Level B. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red signal indication and backups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted, but not objectionably so. SERVICE LEVEL D This level encompasses a zone of increasing restriction approaching instability at the intersection. Delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial during short peaks within the peak hour, but enough cycles with lower demand occur to permit periodic clearance of queues, thus preventing excessive backups. Drivers frequently have to wait through more than one red signal. This level is the lower limit of acceptable operation to most drivers. SERVICE LEVEL E This represents near capacity and capacity operation. At capacity (ICU = 1.0) it represents the most vehicles that the particular intersection can accommodate. However, full utilization of every signal cycle is seldom attained no matter how great the demand. At this level all drivers wait through more than one red signal, and frequently through several. SERVICE LEVEL F Jammed conditions. Traffic backed up from a downstream location on one of the street restricts or prevents movement of traffic through the intersection under consideration. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONManhattan Avenue @ 27th Street-Greenwich VillageN-S St: Manhattan Avenue Peak hr: AM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: 27th Street-Greenwich Village Annual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU12012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 1 0 0.001 0 1 0 0.001 0 1 0 0.001 0 1 0 0.001 0 1 0 0.001 0 1 0 0.001Nb Thru 203 1600 0.174 * 0 203 1600 0.174 * 0 203 1600 0.174 * 0 207 1600 0.177 * 0 207 1600 0.177 * 0 207 1600 0.177 *Nb Right 74 0 - 0 74 0 - 0 74 0 - 0 75 0 - 0 75 0 - 0 75 0 -Sb Left 50 1600 0.031 * 0 50 1600 0.031 * 0 50 1600 0.031 * 0 51 1600 0.032 * 0 51 1600 0.032 * 0 51 1600 0.032 *Sb Thru 55 1600 0.086 0 55 1600 0.087 0 55 1600 0.087 0 56 1600 0.096 0 56 1600 0.097 0 56 1600 0.097Sb Right 82 0 - 2 84 0 - 0 84 0 - 14 98 0 - 2 100 0 - 0 100 0 -Eb Left 284 0 0.178 * 1 285 0 0.178 * 0 285 0 0.178 * 10 300 0 0.187 * 1 301 0 0.188 * 0 301 0 0.188 *Eb Thru 95 1600 0.240 2 97 1600 0.242 0 97 1600 0.242 20 117 1600 0.264 2 119 1600 0.265 0 119 1600 0.265Eb Right 5 0 - 0 5 0 - 0 5 0 - 0 5 0 - 0 5 0 - 0 5 0 -Wb Left 38 0 0.024 0 38 0 0.024 0 38 0 0.024 1 40 0 0.025 0 40 0 0.025 0 40 0 0.025Wb Thru 63 1600 0.095 * 2 65 1600 0.096 * 0 65 1600 0.096 * 24 88 1600 0.113 * 2 90 1600 0.114 * 0 90 1600 0.114 *Wb Right 51 0 - 0 51 0 - 0 51 0 - 0 52 0 - 0 52 0 - 0 52 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.578 0.579 0.579 0.609 0.611 0.611LOS A A A B B B*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:City Traffic Counters2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONManhattan Avenue @ 27th Street-Greenwich VillageN-S St: Manhattan Avenue Peak hr: PM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: 27th Street-Greenwich Village Annual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU12012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 5 0 0.003 * 0 5 0 0.003 * 0 5 0 0.003 * 0 5 0 0.003 * 0 5 0 0.003 * 0 5 0 0.003 *Nb Thru 84 1600 0.088 0 84 1600 0.088 0 84 1600 0.088 1 87 1600 0.092 0 87 1600 0.092 0 87 1600 0.092Nb Right 52 0 - 0 52 0 - 0 52 0 - 2 55 0 - 0 55 0 - 0 55 0 -Sb Left 60 1600 0.038 0 60 1600 0.038 0 60 1600 0.038 0 61 1600 0.038 0 61 1600 0.038 0 61 1600 0.038Sb Thru 191 1600 0.273 * 0 191 1600 0.274 * 0 191 1600 0.274 * 1 196 1600 0.290 * 0 196 1600 0.291 * 0 196 1600 0.291 *Sb Right 245 0 - 2 247 0 - 0 247 0 - 18 268 0 - 2 270 0 - 0 270 0 -Eb Left 90 0 0.056 * 2 92 0 0.058 * 0 92 0 0.058 * 19 111 0 0.069 * 2 113 0 0.071 * 0 113 0 0.071 *Eb Thru 54 1600 0.094 2 56 1600 0.097 0 56 1600 0.097 38 93 1600 0.132 2 95 1600 0.134 0 95 1600 0.134Eb Right 7 0 - 0 7 0 - 0 7 0 - 0 7 0 - 0 7 0 - 0 7 0 -Wb Left 54 0 0.034 0 54 0 0.034 0 54 0 0.034 2 57 0 0.036 0 57 0 0.036 0 57 0 0.036Wb Thru 110 1600 0.139 * 2 112 1600 0.140 * 0 112 1600 0.140 * 37 149 1600 0.166 * 2 151 1600 0.167 * 0 151 1600 0.167 *Wb Right 58 0 - 0 58 0 - 0 58 0 - 0 59 0 - 0 59 0 - 0 59 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.571 0.574 0.574 0.628 0.632 0.632LOS A A A B B B*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:City Traffic Counters2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONHermosa Avenue @ 15th StreetN-S St: Hermosa Avenue Peak hr: AM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: 15th StreetAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU22012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 5 0 0.002 8 13 0 0.004 0 13 0 0.004 0 5 0 0.002 8 13 0 0.004 0 13 0 0.004Nb Thru 411 3200 0.130 * 0 411 3200 0.133 * 0 411 3200 0.133 * 31 450 3200 0.142 * 0 450 3200 0.145 * 0 450 3200 0.145 *Nb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Sb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 *Sb Thru 194 3200 0.062 0 194 3200 0.063 0 194 3200 0.063 39 237 3200 0.075 0 237 3200 0.077 0 237 3200 0.077Sb Right 4 0 - 4 8 0 - 0 8 0 - 0 4 0 - 4 8 0 - 0 8 0 -Eb Left 8 0 0.005 3 11 0 0.007 0 11 0 0.007 0 8 0 0.005 3 11 0 0.007 0 11 0 0.007Eb Thru 0 1600 0.013 * 0 0 1600 0.017 * 0 0 1600 0.017 * 0 0 1600 0.013 * 0 0 1600 0.017 * 0 0 1600 0.017 *Eb Right 13 0 - 3 16 0 - 0 16 0 - 0 13 0 - 3 16 0 - 0 16 0 -Wb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 *Wb Thru 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Wb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.243 0.249 0.249 0.256 0.262 0.262LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:The Traffic Solution2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONHermosa Avenue @ 15th StreetN-S St: Hermosa Avenue Peak hr: PM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: 15th StreetAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU22012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 12 0 0.004 * 7 19 0 0.006 * 0 19 0 0.006 * 0 12 0 0.004 * 7 19 0 0.006 * 0 19 0 0.006 *Nb Thru 228 3200 0.075 0 228 3200 0.077 0 228 3200 0.077 60 293 3200 0.095 0 293 3200 0.097 0 293 3200 0.097Nb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Sb Left 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Sb Thru 424 3200 0.136 * 0 424 3200 0.137 * 0 424 3200 0.137 * 56 488 3200 0.156 * 0 488 3200 0.157 * 0 488 3200 0.157 *Sb Right 11 0 - 4 15 0 - 0 15 0 - 0 11 0 - 4 15 0 - 0 15 0 -Eb Left 3 0 0.002 4 7 0 0.004 0 7 0 0.004 0 3 0 0.002 4 7 0 0.004 0 7 0 0.004Eb Thru 0 1600 0.009 * 0 0 1600 0.014 * 0 0 1600 0.014 * 0 0 1600 0.009 * 0 0 1600 0.014 * 0 0 1600 0.014 *Eb Right 11 0 - 4 15 0 - 0 15 0 - 0 11 0 - 4 15 0 - 0 15 0 -Wb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 *Wb Thru 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Wb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.248 0.257 0.257 0.269 0.277 0.277LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:The Traffic Solution2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONHermosa Avenue @ 14th StreetN-S St: Hermosa Avenue Peak hr: AM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: 14th StreetAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU32012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 33 1600 0.021 0 33 1600 0.021 0 33 1600 0.021 0 34 1600 0.021 0 34 1600 0.021 0 34 1600 0.021Nb Thru 390 3200 0.126 * 8 398 3200 0.128 * 0 398 3200 0.128 * 31 429 3200 0.138 * 8 437 3200 0.140 * 0 437 3200 0.140 *Nb Right 12 0 - 0 12 0 - 0 12 0 - 0 12 0 - 0 12 0 - 0 12 0 -Sb Left 8 0 0.003 * 0 8 0 0.003 * 0 8 0 0.003 * 0 8 0 0.003 * 0 8 0 0.003 * 0 8 0 0.003 *Sb Thru 192 3200 0.067 5 197 3200 0.068 0 197 3200 0.068 39 235 3200 0.080 5 240 3200 0.082 0 240 3200 0.082Sb Right 14 0 - 0 14 0 - 0 14 0 - 0 14 0 - 0 14 0 - 0 14 0 -Eb Left 14 0 0.009 0 14 0 0.009 0 14 0 0.009 0 14 0 0.009 0 14 0 0.009 0 14 0 0.009Eb Thru 8 1600 0.018 * 0 8 1600 0.018 * 0 8 1600 0.018 * 0 8 1600 0.018 * 0 8 1600 0.018 * 0 8 1600 0.018 *Eb Right 6 0 - 0 6 0 - 0 6 0 - 0 6 0 - 0 6 0 - 0 6 0 -Wb Left 7 0 0.004 * 0 7 0 0.004 * 0 7 0 0.004 * 0 7 0 0.004 * 0 7 0 0.004 * 0 7 0 0.004 *Wb Thru 6 1600 0.011 0 6 1600 0.011 0 6 1600 0.011 0 6 1600 0.011 0 6 1600 0.011 0 6 1600 0.011Wb Right 4 0 - 0 4 0 - 0 4 0 - 0 4 0 - 0 4 0 - 0 4 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.250 0.253 0.253 0.263 0.265 0.265LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:The Traffic Solution2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONHermosa Avenue @ 14th StreetN-S St: Hermosa Avenue Peak hr: PM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: 14th StreetAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU32012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 40 1600 0.025 * 0 40 1600 0.025 * 0 40 1600 0.025 * 0 41 1600 0.026 * 0 41 1600 0.026 * 0 41 1600 0.026 *Nb Thru 209 3200 0.071 7 216 3200 0.073 0 216 3200 0.073 60 273 3200 0.091 7 280 3200 0.093 0 280 3200 0.093Nb Right 17 0 - 0 17 0 - 0 17 0 - 0 17 0 - 0 17 0 - 0 17 0 -Sb Left 11 0 0.003 0 11 0 0.003 0 11 0 0.003 0 11 0 0.004 0 11 0 0.004 0 11 0 0.004Sb Thru 414 3200 0.138 * 7 421 3200 0.141 * 0 421 3200 0.141 * 56 478 3200 0.159 * 7 485 3200 0.161 * 0 485 3200 0.161 *Sb Right 18 0 - 0 18 0 - 0 18 0 - 0 18 0 - 0 18 0 - 0 18 0 -Eb Left 11 0 0.007 * 0 11 0 0.007 * 0 11 0 0.007 * 0 11 0 0.007 * 0 11 0 0.007 * 0 11 0 0.007 *Eb Thru 6 1600 0.018 0 6 1600 0.018 0 6 1600 0.018 0 6 1600 0.018 0 6 1600 0.018 0 6 1600 0.018Eb Right 11 0 - 0 11 0 - 0 11 0 - 0 11 0 - 0 11 0 - 0 11 0 -Wb Left 8 0 0.005 0 8 0 0.005 0 8 0 0.005 0 8 0 0.005 0 8 0 0.005 0 8 0 0.005Wb Thru 12 1600 0.023 * 0 12 1600 0.023 * 0 12 1600 0.023 * 0 12 1600 0.024 * 0 12 1600 0.024 * 0 12 1600 0.024 *Wb Right 17 0 - 0 17 0 - 0 17 0 - 0 17 0 - 0 17 0 - 0 17 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.293 0.296 0.296 0.315 0.317 0.317LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:The Traffic Solution2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONHermosa Avenue @ 13th StreetN-S St: Hermosa Avenue Peak hr: AM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: 13th StreetAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU42012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 33 1600 0.021 0 33 1600 0.021 0 33 1600 0.021 55 89 1600 0.055 0 89 1600 0.055 0 89 1600 0.055Nb Thru 428 3200 0.134 * 8 436 3200 0.136 * 0 436 3200 0.136 * 9 446 3200 0.139 * 8 454 3200 0.142 * 0 454 3200 0.142 *Nb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Sb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 *Sb Thru 192 3200 0.062 5 197 3200 0.064 0 197 3200 0.064 9 205 3200 0.076 5 210 3200 0.077 0 210 3200 0.077Sb Right 7 0 - 0 7 0 - 0 7 0 - 30 37 0 - 0 37 0 - 0 37 0 -Eb Left 2 0 0.001 0 2 0 0.001 0 2 0 0.001 22 24 0 0.015 0 24 0 0.015 0 24 0 0.015Eb Thru 0 1600 0.014 * 0 0 1600 0.014 * 0 0 1600 0.014 * 0 0 1600 0.053 * 0 0 1600 0.053 * 0 0 1600 0.053 *Eb Right 20 0 - 0 20 0 - 0 20 0 - 40 60 0 - 0 60 0 - 0 60 0 -Wb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 *Wb Thru 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Wb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.248 0.250 0.250 0.292 0.295 0.295LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:The Traffic Solution2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONHermosa Avenue @ 13th StreetN-S St: Hermosa Avenue Peak hr: PM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: 13th StreetAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU42012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 33 1600 0.021 * 0 33 1600 0.021 * 0 33 1600 0.021 * 74 108 1600 0.067 * 0 108 1600 0.067 * 0 108 1600 0.067 *Nb Thru 232 3200 0.073 7 239 3200 0.075 0 239 3200 0.075 19 256 3200 0.080 7 263 3200 0.082 0 263 3200 0.082Nb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Sb Left 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Sb Thru 412 3200 0.134 * 7 419 3200 0.137 * 0 419 3200 0.137 * 16 436 3200 0.155 * 7 443 3200 0.157 * 0 443 3200 0.157 *Sb Right 18 0 - 0 18 0 - 0 18 0 - 40 58 0 - 0 58 0 - 0 58 0 -Eb Left 29 0 0.018 0 29 0 0.018 0 29 0 0.018 41 71 0 0.044 0 71 0 0.044 0 71 0 0.044Eb Thru 0 1600 0.048 * 0 0 1600 0.048 * 0 0 1600 0.048 * 0 0 1600 0.121 * 0 0 1600 0.121 * 0 0 1600 0.121 *Eb Right 47 0 - 0 47 0 - 0 47 0 - 75 123 0 - 0 123 0 - 0 123 0 -Wb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 *Wb Thru 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Wb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.303 0.305 0.305 0.443 0.445 0.445LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:The Traffic Solution2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONHermosa Avenue @ Pier AvenueN-S St: Hermosa Avenue Peak hr: AM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: Pier AvenueAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU52012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Nb Thru 384 3200 0.146 * 2 386 3200 0.147 * 0 386 3200 0.147 * 26 418 3200 0.162 * 2 420 3200 0.162 * 0 420 3200 0.162 *Nb Right 83 0 - 0 83 0 - 0 83 0 - 15 100 0 - 0 100 0 - 0 100 0 -Sb Left 57 1600 0.036 4 61 1600 0.038 0 61 1600 0.038 28 86 1600 0.054 4 90 1600 0.056 0 90 1600 0.056Sb Thru 159 3200 0.050 2 161 3200 0.050 0 161 3200 0.050 21 183 3200 0.057 2 185 3200 0.058 0 185 3200 0.058Sb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Eb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 *Eb Thru 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Eb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Wb Left 57 1600 0.036 0 57 1600 0.036 0 57 1600 0.036 13 71 1600 0.044 0 71 1600 0.044 0 71 1600 0.044Wb Thru 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Wb Right 84 1600 0.053 * 5 89 1600 0.056 * 0 89 1600 0.056 * 38 124 1600 0.077 * 5 129 1600 0.080 * 0 129 1600 0.080 *Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.334 0.340 0.340 0.393 0.399 0.399LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:The Traffic Solution2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONHermosa Avenue @ Pier AvenueN-S St: Hermosa Avenue Peak hr: PM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: Pier AvenueAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU52012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Nb Thru 186 3200 0.085 * 2 188 3200 0.085 * 0 188 3200 0.085 * 41 231 3200 0.107 * 2 233 3200 0.108 * 0 233 3200 0.108 *Nb Right 85 0 - 0 85 0 - 0 85 0 - 26 113 0 - 0 113 0 - 0 113 0 -Sb Left 89 1600 0.056 * 5 94 1600 0.059 * 0 94 1600 0.059 * 53 144 1600 0.090 * 5 149 1600 0.093 * 0 149 1600 0.093 *Sb Thru 365 3200 0.114 2 367 3200 0.115 0 367 3200 0.115 38 410 3200 0.128 2 412 3200 0.129 0 412 3200 0.129Sb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Eb Left 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Eb Thru 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Eb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Wb Left 80 1600 0.050 0 80 1600 0.050 0 80 1600 0.050 24 106 1600 0.066 0 106 1600 0.066 0 106 1600 0.066Wb Thru 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Wb Right 83 1600 0.052 5 88 1600 0.055 0 88 1600 0.055 52 137 1600 0.085 5 142 1600 0.089 0 142 1600 0.089Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.290 0.294 0.294 0.363 0.367 0.367LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:The Traffic Solution2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONManhattan Avenue (West) @ Pier AvenueN-S St: Manhattan Avenue (West) Peak hr: AM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: Pier AvenueAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU62012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 5 0 0.003 0 5 0 0.003 0 5 0 0.003 0 5 0 0.003 0 5 0 0.003 0 5 0 0.003Nb Thru 0 1600 0.049 * 0 0 1600 0.049 * 0 0 1600 0.049 * 0 0 1600 0.050 * 0 0 1600 0.050 * 0 0 1600 0.050 *Nb Right 73 0 - 0 73 0 - 0 73 0 - 0 74 0 - 0 74 0 - 0 74 0 -Sb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 *Sb Thru 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Sb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Eb Left 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Eb Thru 176 1600 0.116 * 4 180 1600 0.118 * 0 180 1600 0.118 * 43 223 1600 0.145 * 4 227 1600 0.147 * 0 227 1600 0.147 *Eb Right 9 0 - 0 9 0 - 0 9 0 - 0 9 0 - 0 9 0 - 0 9 0 -Wb Left 29 0 0.009 * 0 29 0 0.009 * 0 29 0 0.009 * 0 30 0 0.009 * 0 30 0 0.009 * 0 30 0 0.009 *Wb Thru 153 3200 0.057 5 158 3200 0.058 0 158 3200 0.058 52 208 3200 0.074 5 213 3200 0.076 0 213 3200 0.076Wb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.273 0.276 0.276 0.304 0.306 0.306LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:City Traffic Counters2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONManhattan Avenue (West) @ Pier AvenueN-S St: Manhattan Avenue (West) Peak hr: PM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: Pier AvenueAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU62012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 1 0 0.001 0 1 0 0.001 0 1 0 0.001 0 1 0 0.001 0 1 0 0.001 0 1 0 0.001Nb Thru 0 1600 0.025 * 0 0 1600 0.025 * 0 0 1600 0.025 * 0 0 1600 0.026 * 0 0 1600 0.026 * 0 0 1600 0.026 *Nb Right 39 0 - 0 39 0 - 0 39 0 - 1 41 0 - 0 41 0 - 0 41 0 -Sb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 *Sb Thru 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Sb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Eb Left 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Eb Thru 185 1600 0.122 * 5 190 1600 0.125 * 0 190 1600 0.125 * 79 268 1600 0.174 * 5 273 1600 0.177 * 0 273 1600 0.177 *Eb Right 10 0 - 0 10 0 - 0 10 0 - 0 10 0 - 0 10 0 - 0 10 0 -Wb Left 87 0 0.027 * 0 87 0 0.027 * 0 87 0 0.027 * 1 90 0 0.028 * 0 90 0 0.028 * 0 90 0 0.028 *Wb Thru 225 3200 0.098 5 230 3200 0.099 0 230 3200 0.099 76 306 3200 0.124 5 311 3200 0.125 0 311 3200 0.125Wb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.274 0.277 0.277 0.328 0.331 0.331LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:City Traffic Counters2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONManhattan Avenue (East) @ Pier AvenueN-S St: Manhattan Avenue (East) Peak hr: AM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: Pier AvenueAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU72012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 *Nb Thru 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Nb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Sb Left 43 0 0.027 0 43 0 0.027 0 43 0 0.027 1 45 0 0.028 0 45 0 0.028 0 45 0 0.028Sb Thru 0 1600 0.041 * 0 0 1600 0.041 * 0 0 1600 0.041 * 0 0 1600 0.043 * 0 0 1600 0.043 * 0 0 1600 0.043 *Sb Right 22 0 - 0 22 0 - 0 22 0 - 1 23 0 - 0 23 0 - 0 23 0 -Eb Left 51 0 0.016 * 0 51 0 0.016 * 0 51 0 0.016 * 1 53 0 0.017 * 0 53 0 0.017 * 0 53 0 0.017 *Eb Thru 202 3200 0.079 4 206 3200 0.080 0 206 3200 0.080 42 248 3200 0.094 4 252 3200 0.095 0 252 3200 0.095Eb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Wb Left 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Wb Thru 162 3200 0.068 * 5 167 3200 0.069 * 0 167 3200 0.069 * 51 216 3200 0.085 * 5 221 3200 0.087 * 0 221 3200 0.087 *Wb Right 55 0 - 0 55 0 - 0 55 0 - 1 57 0 - 0 57 0 - 0 57 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.224 0.226 0.226 0.245 0.246 0.246LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:City Traffic Counters2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONManhattan Avenue (East) @ Pier AvenueN-S St: Manhattan Avenue (East) Peak hr: PM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: Pier AvenueAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU72012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0 0.000 *Nb Thru 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Nb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Sb Left 60 0 0.038 0 60 0 0.038 0 60 0 0.038 3 64 0 0.040 0 64 0 0.040 0 64 0 0.040Sb Thru 0 1600 0.078 * 0 0 1600 0.078 * 0 0 1600 0.078 * 0 0 1600 0.083 * 0 0 1600 0.083 * 0 0 1600 0.083 *Sb Right 65 0 - 0 65 0 - 0 65 0 - 3 69 0 - 0 69 0 - 0 69 0 -Eb Left 24 0 0.008 * 0 24 0 0.008 * 0 24 0 0.008 * 3 27 0 0.009 * 0 27 0 0.009 * 0 27 0 0.009 *Eb Thru 196 3200 0.069 5 201 3200 0.070 0 201 3200 0.070 76 276 3200 0.095 5 281 3200 0.096 0 281 3200 0.096Eb Right 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -Wb Left 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0.000Wb Thru 238 3200 0.096 * 5 243 3200 0.097 * 0 243 3200 0.097 * 73 316 3200 0.121 * 5 321 3200 0.123 * 0 321 3200 0.123 *Wb Right 68 0 - 0 68 0 - 0 68 0 - 3 72 0 - 0 72 0 - 0 72 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.281 0.283 0.283 0.313 0.315 0.315LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:City Traffic Counters2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONMonterey Boulevard @ Pier AvenueN-S St: Monterey Boulevard Peak hr: AM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: Pier AvenueAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU82012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 9 0 0.006 0 9 0 0.006 0 9 0 0.006 0 9 0 0.006 0 9 0 0.006 0 9 0 0.006Nb Thru 95 1600 0.094 * 0 95 1600 0.094 * 0 95 1600 0.094 * 0 97 1600 0.096 * 0 97 1600 0.096 * 0 97 1600 0.096 *Nb Right 46 0 - 0 46 0 - 0 46 0 - 0 47 0 - 0 47 0 - 0 47 0 -Sb Left 32 0 0.020 * 0 32 0 0.020 * 0 32 0 0.020 * 0 33 0 0.020 * 0 33 0 0.020 * 0 33 0 0.020 *Sb Thru 40 1600 0.046 0 40 1600 0.046 0 40 1600 0.046 0 41 1600 0.047 0 41 1600 0.047 0 41 1600 0.047Sb Right 2 0 - 0 2 0 - 0 2 0 - 0 2 0 - 0 2 0 - 0 2 0 -Eb Left 14 0 0.004 * 0 14 0 0.004 * 0 14 0 0.004 * 0 14 0 0.004 * 0 14 0 0.004 * 0 14 0 0.004 *Eb Thru 209 3200 0.074 4 213 3200 0.075 0 213 3200 0.075 43 256 3200 0.089 4 260 3200 0.090 0 260 3200 0.090Eb Right 13 0 - 0 13 0 - 0 13 0 - 0 13 0 - 0 13 0 - 0 13 0 -Wb Left 14 0 0.004 0 14 0 0.004 0 14 0 0.004 0 14 0 0.004 0 14 0 0.004 0 14 0 0.004Wb Thru 177 3200 0.075 * 5 182 3200 0.077 * 0 182 3200 0.077 * 52 233 3200 0.093 * 5 238 3200 0.095 * 0 238 3200 0.095 *Wb Right 50 0 - 0 50 0 - 0 50 0 - 0 51 0 - 0 51 0 - 0 51 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.293 0.295 0.295 0.314 0.315 0.315LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:City Traffic Counters2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS600 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 500, Pasadena CA 91106(626) 796.2322 Fax (626) 792-0941INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATIONMonterey Boulevard @ Pier AvenueN-S St: Monterey Boulevard Peak hr: PM Date: 11/13/2012E-W St: Pier AvenueAnnual Growth: 1.00% Date of Count: 2012Project: Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/1-123996-1Projection Year: 2014File: ICU82012 EXIST. TRAFFIC 2012 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT 2012 EXIST. W/PROJECT + MITIGATION 2014 FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT 2014 FUTURE WITH PROJECT 2014 FUTURE W/PROJECT + MITIGATIO1 2 V/C Added Total V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/C Added Total 2 V/CMovement Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume Capacity Ratio Volume Volume CapacityRatio Volume Volume Capacity RatioNb Left 27 0 0.017 0 27 0 0.017 0 27 0 0.017 0 28 0 0.017 0 28 0 0.017 0 28 0 0.017Nb Thru 96 1600 0.101 * 0 96 1600 0.101 * 0 96 1600 0.101 * 0 98 1600 0.103 * 0 98 1600 0.103 * 0 98 1600 0.103 *Nb Right 39 0 - 0 39 0 - 0 39 0 - 0 40 0 - 0 40 0 - 0 40 0 -Sb Left 37 0 0.023 * 0 37 0 0.023 * 0 37 0 0.023 * 0 38 0 0.024 * 0 38 0 0.024 * 0 38 0 0.024 *Sb Thru 63 1600 0.071 0 63 1600 0.071 0 63 1600 0.071 0 64 1600 0.072 0 64 1600 0.072 0 64 1600 0.072Sb Right 13 0 - 0 13 0 - 0 13 0 - 0 13 0 - 0 13 0 - 0 13 0 -Eb Left 6 0 0.002 * 0 6 0 0.002 * 0 6 0 0.002 * 0 6 0 0.002 * 0 6 0 0.002 * 0 6 0 0.002 *Eb Thru 239 3200 0.082 5 244 3200 0.083 0 244 3200 0.083 80 324 3200 0.108 5 329 3200 0.110 0 329 3200 0.110Eb Right 16 0 - 0 16 0 - 0 16 0 - 0 16 0 - 0 16 0 - 0 16 0 -Wb Left 27 0 0.008 0 27 0 0.008 0 27 0 0.008 0 28 0 0.009 0 28 0 0.009 0 28 0 0.009Wb Thru 268 3200 0.111 * 5 273 3200 0.112 * 0 273 3200 0.112 * 77 350 3200 0.137 * 5 355 3200 0.138 * 0 355 3200 0.138 *Wb Right 59 0 - 0 59 0 - 0 59 0 - 0 60 0 - 0 60 0 - 0 60 0 -Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 * 0.100 *ICU 0.337 0.338 0.338 0.366 0.367 0.367LOS A A A A A A*Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU1 Counts conducted by:City Traffic Counters2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS In the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), published by the Transportation Research Board, 2000, level of service for unsignalized intersections is defined in terms of delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number of factors that relate to control, geometrics, traffic, and incidents. Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during base conditions, in the absence of incidents, control, traffic, or geometric delay. Only the portion of total delay attributed to the traffic control measures, either traffic signals or stop signs, is quantified. This delay is called control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Level of Service criteria for unsignalized intersections are stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle. The level of service is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. Average control delay for any particular minor movement is a function of the service time for the approach and the degree of utilization. (Level of service is not defined for the intersection as a whole for two-way stop controlled intersections.) Level of Service Criteria for TWSC/AWSC Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay (Sec/Veh) A ≤ 10 B > 10 and ≤ 15 C > 15 and ≤ 25 D > 25 and ≤ 35 E > 35 and ≤ 50 F > 50 Level of Service (LOS) values are used to describe intersection operations with service levels varying from LOS A (free flow) to LOS F (jammed condition). The following descriptions summarize HCM criteria for each level of service: LOS A describes operations with very low control delay, up to 10 seconds per vehicle. LOS B describes operations with control delay greater than 10 and up to 15 seconds per vehicle. LOS C describes operations with control delay greater than 15 and up to 25 seconds per vehicle. LOS D describes operations with control delay greater than 25 and up to 35 seconds per vehicle. LOS E describes operations with control delay greater than 35 and up to 50 seconds per vehicle. LOS F describes operations with control delay in excess of 50 seconds per vehicle. For two-way stop controlled intersections, LOS F exists when there are insufficient gaps of suitable size to allow side-street demand to safely cross through a major-street traffic stream. This level of service is generally evident from extremely long control delays experienced by side-street traffic and by queuing on the minor-street approaches. ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C1-INT1AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing (2012) Conditions Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 27th Street-Greenwich Village North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 284 95 5 38 63 51 %Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 1 203 74 50 55 82 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR L TR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)384 152 278 50 137 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 2 Geometry Group 2 2 4a 5 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.7 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.6 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 -0.2 -0.2 0.5 -0.4 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.34 0.14 0.25 0.04 0.12 hd, final value (s)5.72 5.90 5.84 7.12 6.18 x, final value 0.61 0.25 0.45 0.10 0.24 Move-up time, m (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 Service Time, ts (s)3.7 3.9 3.8 4.8 3.9 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)602 402 528 300 387 Delay (s/veh)17.23 10.84 13.53 10.60 10.78 LOS C B B B B Approach: Delay (s/veh) 17.23 10.84 13.53 10.73 LOS C B B B Intersection Delay (s/veh)14.02 Intersection LOS B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:12 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C1-INT1PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing (2012) Conditions Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 27th Street-Greenwich Village North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 90 54 7 54 110 58 %Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 5 84 52 60 191 245 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR L TR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)151 222 141 60 436 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 2 Geometry Group 2 2 4a 5 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.6 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.6 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 -0.1 -0.2 0.5 -0.4 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.13 0.20 0.13 0.05 0.39 hd, final value (s)6.14 5.79 5.74 6.37 5.46 x, final value 0.26 0.36 0.22 0.11 0.66 Move-up time, m (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 Service Time, ts (s)4.1 3.8 3.7 4.1 3.2 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)401 472 391 310 641 Delay (s/veh)11.25 11.98 10.40 9.82 18.19 LOS B B B A C Approach: Delay (s/veh) 11.25 11.98 10.40 17.17 LOS B B B C Intersection Delay (s/veh)14.20 Intersection LOS B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:14 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C1-INT2AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing (2012) Conditions Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 15th Street North/South Street: Hermosa Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)5 411 0 194 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)5 411 0 0 194 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)8 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)8 0 13 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LR v (veh/h)5 0 21 C (m) (veh/h)1387 1159 764 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.08 Control Delay (s/veh)7.6 8.1 9.8 LOS A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 9.8 Approach LOS ---- A Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:17 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C1-INT2PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing (2012) Conditions Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 15th Street North/South Street: Hermosa Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)12 228 0 424 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)12 228 0 0 424 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)3 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)3 0 11 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LR v (veh/h)12 0 14 C (m) (veh/h)1135 1352 703 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.03 0.00 0.06 Control Delay (s/veh)8.2 7.7 10.2 LOS A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 10.2 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:17 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C1-INT6AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing (2012) Conditions Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (West) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 176 9 29 153 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 176 9 29 153 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 2 0 Configuration TR LT T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)5 73 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)5 0 73 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 29 78 C (m) (veh/h) 1402 849 v/c 0.02 0.09 95% queue length 0.06 0.30 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 9.7 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh)----9.7 Approach LOS ----A Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:18 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C1-INT6PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing (2012) Conditions Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (West) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 185 10 87 225 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 185 10 87 225 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 2 0 Configuration TR LT T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)1 39 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)1 0 39 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 87 40 C (m) (veh/h) 1390 841 v/c 0.06 0.05 95% queue length 0.20 0.15 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 9.5 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh)----9.5 Approach LOS ----A Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:18 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C1-INT7AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing (2012) Conditions Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (East) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)51 202 162 55 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)51 202 0 0 162 55 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 43 22 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 43 0 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h)51 65 C (m) (veh/h)1365 657 v/c 0.04 0.10 95% queue length 0.12 0.33 Control Delay (s/veh)7.7 11.1 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 11.1 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:19 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C1-INT7AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing (2012) Conditions Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (East) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)24 196 238 68 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)24 196 0 0 238 68 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 60 65 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 60 0 65 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h)24 125 C (m) (veh/h)1266 694 v/c 0.02 0.18 95% queue length 0.06 0.65 Control Delay (s/veh)7.9 11.3 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 11.3 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:19 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C1-INT8AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Monterey Boulevard Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 14 209 13 14 177 50 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 9 95 46 32 40 2 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT TR LT TR LTR LTR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)118 118 102 139 150 74 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 -0.1 0.1 -0.3 -0.2 0.1 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.12 0.13 0.07 hd, final value (s)5.44 5.30 5.45 5.12 4.97 5.33 x, final value 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.20 0.21 0.11 Move-up time, m (s)2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time, ts (s)3.1 3.0 3.1 2.8 3.0 3.3 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)368 368 352 389 400 324 Delay (s/veh)9.31 9.11 9.14 9.08 9.26 8.98 LOS A A A A A A Approach: Delay (s/veh) 9.21 9.10 9.26 8.98 LOS A A A A Intersection Delay (s/veh)9.16 Intersection LOS A Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:20 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C1-INT8PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing (2012) Conditions Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Monterey Boulevard Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 6 239 16 27 268 59 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 27 96 39 37 63 13 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT TR LT TR LTR LTR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)125 136 161 193 162 113 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.3 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 -0.1 0.1 -0.2 -0.1 -0.0 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.17 0.14 0.10 hd, final value (s)5.78 5.68 5.73 5.43 5.47 5.67 x, final value 0.20 0.21 0.26 0.29 0.25 0.18 Move-up time, m (s)2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time, ts (s)3.5 3.4 3.4 3.1 3.5 3.7 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)375 386 411 443 412 363 Delay (s/veh)9.93 9.92 10.40 10.35 10.24 9.89 LOS A A B B B A Approach: Delay (s/veh) 9.92 10.37 10.24 9.89 LOS A B B A Intersection Delay (s/veh)10.16 Intersection LOS B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:20 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C2-INT1AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing Plus Proj. Conditions Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project/ 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 27th Street-Greenwich Village North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 285 97 5 38 65 51 %Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 1 203 74 50 55 84 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR L TR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)387 154 278 50 139 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 2 Geometry Group 2 2 4a 5 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.7 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.6 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 -0.1 -0.2 0.5 -0.4 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.34 0.14 0.25 0.04 0.12 hd, final value (s)5.74 5.92 5.86 7.15 6.21 x, final value 0.62 0.25 0.45 0.10 0.24 Move-up time, m (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 Service Time, ts (s)3.7 3.9 3.9 4.8 3.9 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)601 404 528 300 389 Delay (s/veh)17.51 10.92 13.63 10.64 10.85 LOS C B B B B Approach: Delay (s/veh) 17.51 10.92 13.63 10.80 LOS C B B B Intersection Delay (s/veh)14.17 Intersection LOS B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:21 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C2-INT1PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing Plus Proj. Conditions Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 27th Street-Greenwich Village North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 92 56 7 54 112 58 %Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 5 84 52 60 191 247 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR L TR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)155 224 141 60 438 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 2 Geometry Group 2 2 4a 5 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.6 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.6 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 -0.1 -0.2 0.5 -0.4 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.14 0.20 0.13 0.05 0.39 hd, final value (s)6.16 5.82 5.78 6.39 5.49 x, final value 0.27 0.36 0.23 0.11 0.67 Move-up time, m (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 Service Time, ts (s)4.2 3.8 3.8 4.1 3.2 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)405 474 391 310 638 Delay (s/veh)11.36 12.08 10.46 9.85 18.49 LOS B B B A C Approach: Delay (s/veh) 11.36 12.08 10.46 17.45 LOS B B B C Intersection Delay (s/veh)14.37 Intersection LOS B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:32 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C2-INT2AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing Plus Proj. Conditions Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 15th Street North/South Street: Hermosa Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)13 411 0 194 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)13 411 0 0 194 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)11 16 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)11 0 16 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LR v (veh/h)13 0 27 C (m) (veh/h)1382 1159 739 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.04 95% queue length 0.03 0.00 0.11 Control Delay (s/veh)7.6 8.1 10.1 LOS A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 10.1 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:35 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C2-INT2PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing Plus Proj. Conditions Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 15th Street North/South Street: Hermosa Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)19 228 0 424 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)19 228 0 0 424 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)7 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)7 0 15 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LR v (veh/h)19 0 22 C (m) (veh/h)1132 1352 645 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.05 0.00 0.11 Control Delay (s/veh)8.2 7.7 10.8 LOS A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 10.8 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:35 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C2-INT6AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing Plus Proj. Conditions Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (West) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 180 9 29 158 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 180 9 29 158 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 2 0 Configuration TR LT T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)5 73 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)5 0 73 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 29 78 C (m) (veh/h) 1397 845 v/c 0.02 0.09 95% queue length 0.06 0.30 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 9.7 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh)----9.7 Approach LOS ----A Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:35 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C2-INT6PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing Plus Proj. Conditions Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (West) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 190 10 87 230 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 190 10 87 230 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 2 0 Configuration TR LT T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)1 39 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)1 0 39 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 87 40 C (m) (veh/h) 1384 835 v/c 0.06 0.05 95% queue length 0.20 0.15 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 9.5 LOS A A Approach Delay (s/veh)----9.5 Approach LOS ----A Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:36 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C2-INT7AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing Plus Proj. Conditions Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (East) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)51 206 167 55 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)51 206 0 0 167 55 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 43 22 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 43 0 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h)51 65 C (m) (veh/h)1359 652 v/c 0.04 0.10 95% queue length 0.12 0.33 Control Delay (s/veh)7.8 11.1 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 11.1 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:39 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C2-INT7PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing Plus Proj. Conditions Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (East) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)24 201 243 68 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)24 201 0 0 243 68 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 60 65 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 60 0 65 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h)24 125 C (m) (veh/h)1261 689 v/c 0.02 0.18 95% queue length 0.06 0.66 Control Delay (s/veh)7.9 11.4 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 11.4 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:39 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C2-INT8AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing Plus Proj. Conditions Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Monterey Boulevard Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 14 213 13 14 182 50 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 9 95 46 32 40 2 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT TR LT TR LTR LTR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)120 120 105 141 150 74 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 -0.1 0.1 -0.2 -0.2 0.1 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.13 0.13 0.07 hd, final value (s)5.44 5.31 5.45 5.13 4.99 5.35 x, final value 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.20 0.21 0.11 Move-up time, m (s)2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time, ts (s)3.1 3.0 3.2 2.8 3.0 3.4 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)370 370 355 391 400 324 Delay (s/veh)9.35 9.15 9.18 9.12 9.30 9.01 LOS A A A A A A Approach: Delay (s/veh) 9.25 9.15 9.30 9.01 LOS A A A A Intersection Delay (s/veh)9.20 Intersection LOS A Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:40 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C2-INT8PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Existing Plus Proj. Conditions Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Monterey Boulevard Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 6 244 16 27 273 59 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 27 96 39 37 63 13 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT TR LT TR LTR LTR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)128 138 163 196 162 113 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.3 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 -0.1 0.1 -0.2 -0.1 -0.0 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.17 0.14 0.10 hd, final value (s)5.79 5.69 5.74 5.45 5.49 5.69 x, final value 0.21 0.22 0.26 0.30 0.25 0.18 Move-up time, m (s)2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time, ts (s)3.5 3.4 3.4 3.1 3.5 3.7 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)378 388 413 446 412 363 Delay (s/veh)9.99 9.97 10.45 10.43 10.28 9.93 LOS A A B B B A Approach: Delay (s/veh) 9.98 10.44 10.28 9.93 LOS A B B A Intersection Delay (s/veh)10.21 Intersection LOS B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 8:49 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C3-INT1AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) W/O Project Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project \ 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 27th Street-Greenwich Village North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 300 117 5 40 88 52 %Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 1 207 75 51 56 98 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR L TR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)422 180 283 51 154 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 2 Geometry Group 2 2 4a 5 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.7 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.6 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 -0.1 -0.2 0.5 -0.4 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.38 0.16 0.25 0.05 0.14 hd, final value (s)5.95 6.21 6.19 7.48 6.51 x, final value 0.70 0.31 0.49 0.11 0.28 Move-up time, m (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 Service Time, ts (s)3.9 4.2 4.2 5.2 4.2 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)583 430 533 301 404 Delay (s/veh)21.47 11.99 14.91 11.06 11.70 LOS C B B B B Approach: Delay (s/veh) 21.47 11.99 14.91 11.54 LOS C B B B Intersection Delay (s/veh)16.33 Intersection LOS C Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 10:34 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C3-INT1PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) W/O Project Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 27th Street-Greenwich Village North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 111 93 7 57 149 59 %Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 5 87 55 61 196 268 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR L TR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)211 265 147 61 464 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 2 Geometry Group 2 2 4a 5 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.5 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.6 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 -0.1 -0.2 0.5 -0.4 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.19 0.24 0.13 0.05 0.41 hd, final value (s)6.54 6.24 6.38 6.84 5.92 x, final value 0.38 0.46 0.26 0.12 0.76 Move-up time, m (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 Service Time, ts (s)4.5 4.2 4.4 4.5 3.6 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)461 515 397 311 593 Delay (s/veh)13.54 14.44 11.62 10.44 25.17 LOS B B B B D Approach: Delay (s/veh) 13.54 14.44 11.62 23.46 LOS B B B C Intersection Delay (s/veh)18.04 Intersection LOS C Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:31 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C3-INT2AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) W/O Project Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 15th Street North/South Street: Hermosa Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)5 450 0 237 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)5 450 0 0 237 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)8 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)8 0 13 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LR v (veh/h)5 0 21 C (m) (veh/h)1337 1121 719 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh)7.7 8.2 10.2 LOS A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 10.2 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:32 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C3-INT2PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) W/O Project Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 15th Street North/South Street: Hermosa Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)12 293 0 488 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)12 293 0 0 488 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)3 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)3 0 11 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LR v (veh/h)12 0 14 C (m) (veh/h)1075 1280 652 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.03 0.00 0.07 Control Delay (s/veh)8.4 7.8 10.6 LOS A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 10.6 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:32 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C3-INT6AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) W/O Project Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (West) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 223 9 30 208 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 223 9 30 208 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 2 0 Configuration TR LT T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)5 74 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)5 0 74 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 30 79 C (m) (veh/h) 1348 795 v/c 0.02 0.10 95% queue length 0.07 0.33 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 10.0 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)----10.0 Approach LOS ----B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:33 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C3-INT6PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) W/O Project Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (West) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 268 10 90 306 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 268 10 90 306 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 2 0 Configuration TR LT T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)1 41 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)1 0 41 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 90 42 C (m) (veh/h) 1296 755 v/c 0.07 0.06 95% queue length 0.22 0.18 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.0 10.0 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)----10.0 Approach LOS ----B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:33 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C3-INT7AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) W/O Project Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (East) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)53 248 216 57 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)53 248 0 0 216 57 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 45 23 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 45 0 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h)53 68 C (m) (veh/h)1302 594 v/c 0.04 0.11 95% queue length 0.13 0.39 Control Delay (s/veh)7.9 11.8 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 11.8 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:52 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C3-INT7PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) W/O Project Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (East) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)27 276 316 72 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)27 276 0 0 316 72 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 64 69 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 64 0 69 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h)27 133 C (m) (veh/h)1182 607 v/c 0.02 0.22 95% queue length 0.07 0.83 Control Delay (s/veh)8.1 12.6 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 12.6 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:35 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C3-INT8AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) W/O Project Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Monterey Boulevard Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 14 256 13 14 233 51 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 9 97 47 33 41 2 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT TR LT TR LTR LTR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)142 141 130 168 153 76 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 -0.1 0.1 -0.2 -0.2 0.1 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.07 hd, final value (s)5.55 5.43 5.54 5.27 5.22 5.60 x, final value 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.25 0.22 0.12 Move-up time, m (s)2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time, ts (s)3.2 3.1 3.2 3.0 3.2 3.6 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)392 391 380 418 403 326 Delay (s/veh)9.80 9.60 9.62 9.68 9.70 9.35 LOS A A A A A A Approach: Delay (s/veh) 9.70 9.66 9.70 9.35 LOS A A A A Intersection Delay (s/veh)9.65 Intersection LOS A Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:36 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C3-INT8PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) W/O Project Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Monterey Boulevard Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 6 324 16 28 350 60 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 28 98 40 38 64 13 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT TR LT TR LTR LTR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)168 178 203 235 166 115 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 -0.1 0.1 -0.2 -0.1 -0.0 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.15 0.16 0.18 0.21 0.15 0.10 hd, final value (s)6.00 5.92 5.94 5.69 5.88 6.11 x, final value 0.28 0.29 0.34 0.37 0.27 0.20 Move-up time, m (s)2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time, ts (s)3.7 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.9 4.1 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)418 428 453 485 416 365 Delay (s/veh)11.02 11.05 11.61 11.72 11.06 10.59 LOS B B B B B B Approach: Delay (s/veh) 11.04 11.67 11.06 10.59 LOS B B B B Intersection Delay (s/veh)11.25 Intersection LOS B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:36 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C4-INT1AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) With Project Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 27th Street-Greenwich Village North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 301 119 5 40 90 52 %Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 1 207 75 51 56 100 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR L TR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)425 182 283 51 156 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 2 Geometry Group 2 2 4a 5 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.7 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.6 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 -0.1 -0.2 0.5 -0.4 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.38 0.16 0.25 0.05 0.14 hd, final value (s)5.96 6.24 6.22 7.50 6.53 x, final value 0.70 0.32 0.49 0.11 0.28 Move-up time, m (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 Service Time, ts (s)4.0 4.2 4.2 5.2 4.2 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)582 432 533 301 406 Delay (s/veh)21.90 12.09 15.02 11.09 11.79 LOS C B C B B Approach: Delay (s/veh) 21.90 12.09 15.02 11.62 LOS C B C B Intersection Delay (s/veh)16.56 Intersection LOS C Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:37 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C4-INT1PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) With Project Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 27th Street-Greenwich Village North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 113 95 7 57 151 59 %Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 5 87 55 61 196 270 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR L TR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)215 267 147 61 466 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 2 Geometry Group 2 2 4a 5 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.5 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.6 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.7 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 -0.1 -0.2 0.5 -0.4 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.19 0.24 0.13 0.05 0.41 hd, final value (s)6.56 6.27 6.43 6.87 5.95 x, final value 0.39 0.47 0.26 0.12 0.77 Move-up time, m (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 Service Time, ts (s)4.6 4.3 4.4 4.6 3.7 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)465 517 397 311 591 Delay (s/veh)13.73 14.61 11.70 10.48 25.78 LOS B B B B D Approach: Delay (s/veh) 13.73 14.61 11.70 24.00 LOS B B B C Intersection Delay (s/veh)18.36 Intersection LOS C Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:39 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C4-INT2AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) With Project Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 15th Street North/South Street: Hermosa Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)13 450 0 237 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)13 450 0 0 237 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)11 16 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)11 0 16 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LR v (veh/h)13 0 27 C (m) (veh/h)1333 1121 695 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.04 95% queue length 0.03 0.00 0.12 Control Delay (s/veh)7.7 8.2 10.4 LOS A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 10.4 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:40 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C4-INT2PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) With Project Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: 15th Street North/South Street: Hermosa Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)19 293 0 488 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)19 293 0 0 488 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)7 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)7 0 15 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LR v (veh/h)19 0 22 C (m) (veh/h)1072 1280 590 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.04 95% queue length 0.05 0.00 0.12 Control Delay (s/veh)8.4 7.8 11.3 LOS A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 11.3 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:40 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C4-INT6AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) With Project Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (West) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 227 9 30 213 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 227 9 30 213 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 2 0 Configuration TR LT T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)5 74 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)5 0 74 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 30 79 C (m) (veh/h) 1343 791 v/c 0.02 0.10 95% queue length 0.07 0.33 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 10.1 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)----10.1 Approach LOS ----B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:41 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C4-INT6PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) With Project Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (West) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 273 10 90 311 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 273 10 90 311 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 2 0 Configuration TR LT T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)1 41 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)1 0 41 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 90 42 C (m) (veh/h) 1291 750 v/c 0.07 0.06 95% queue length 0.22 0.18 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.0 10.1 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)----10.1 Approach LOS ----B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:41 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C4-INT7AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) With Project Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (East) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)53 252 221 57 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)53 252 0 0 221 57 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 45 23 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 45 0 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h)53 68 C (m) (veh/h)1296 588 v/c 0.04 0.12 95% queue length 0.13 0.39 Control Delay (s/veh)7.9 11.9 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 11.9 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:42 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C4-INT7PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) With Project Project Description Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Manhattan Avenue (East) Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)27 281 321 72 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)27 281 0 0 321 72 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 64 69 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h)0 0 0 64 0 69 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h)27 133 C (m) (veh/h)1177 602 v/c 0.02 0.22 95% queue length 0.07 0.84 Control Delay (s/veh)8.1 12.7 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)---- 12.7 Approach LOS ---- B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:42 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection C4-INT8AM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) With Project Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Monterey Boulevard Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 14 260 13 14 238 51 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 9 97 47 33 41 2 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT TR LT TR LTR LTR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)144 143 133 170 153 76 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 -0.1 0.1 -0.2 -0.2 0.1 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.07 hd, final value (s)5.56 5.44 5.55 5.28 5.24 5.62 x, final value 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.25 0.22 0.12 Move-up time, m (s)2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time, ts (s)3.3 3.1 3.2 3.0 3.2 3.6 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)394 393 383 420 403 326 Delay (s/veh)9.84 9.64 9.67 9.73 9.73 9.37 LOS A A A A A A Approach: Delay (s/veh) 9.74 9.71 9.73 9.37 LOS A A A A Intersection Delay (s/veh)9.69 Intersection LOS A Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:44 AM ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst CT Agency/Co.LLG Engineers Date Performed 11/8/2012 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection C4-INT8PM Jurisdiction City of Hermosa Beach Analysis Year Future (2014) With Project Project ID Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project / 1-123996-1 East/West Street: Pier Avenue North/South Street: Monterey Boulevard Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 6 329 16 28 355 60 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 28 98 40 38 64 13 %Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT TR LT TR LTR LTR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate (veh/h)170 181 205 238 166 115 % Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration, T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop. Left-Turns 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 -0.1 0.1 -0.2 -0.1 -0.0 Departure Headway and Service Time hd, initial value (s)3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.15 0.16 0.18 0.21 0.15 0.10 hd, final value (s)6.01 5.93 5.95 5.71 5.91 6.14 x, final value 0.28 0.30 0.34 0.38 0.27 0.20 Move-up time, m (s)2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time, ts (s)3.7 3.6 3.7 3.4 3.9 4.1 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity (veh/h)420 431 455 488 416 365 Delay (s/veh)11.08 11.14 11.68 11.82 11.10 10.63 LOS B B B B B B Approach: Delay (s/veh) 11.11 11.75 11.10 10.63 LOS B B B B Intersection Delay (s/veh)11.32 Intersection LOS B Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 11/15/2012 9:44 AM LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project O:\JOB_FILE\3996\Report\Appendix Covers.doc APPENDIX C SHARED PARKING DEMAND DATA LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project Month:Jul Land Use Leisure Hotel Size 30 Rooms 0.695 KSF Peak Pkg Rate[2]1.00 /Room 1.0 /50 SF Weekday Pkg Rate[3]0.97 /Room 1.0 /50 SF Gross Spaces 29 Spaces 14 Spaces Comparison w/ Adjusted Gross 1.00 29 Spaces 0.75 Parking Supply Spaces[4]23 Guest Spc.6 Emp. Spc.10 Spc.Shared 33 Spaces Time % Of # Of % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking Surplus of Day Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Demand (Deficiency) 6:00 AM 95%22 5%0 0%0 22 11 7:00 AM 95%22 30%2 0%0 24 9 8:00 AM 90%21 90%5 30%3 29 4 9:00 AM 80%18 90%5 60%6 29 4 10:00 AM 70%16 100%6 60%6 28 5 11:00 AM 70%16 100%6 60%6 28 5 12:00 PM 65%15 100%6 65%7 28 5 1:00 PM 65%15 100%6 65%7 28 5 2:00 PM 70%16 100%6 65%7 29 4 3:00 PM 70%16 100%6 65%7 29 4 4:00 PM 75%17 90%5 65%7 29 4 5:00 PM 80%18 70%4 100%10 32 1 6:00 PM 85%20 40%2 100%10 32 1 7:00 PM 85%20 20%1 100%10 31 2 8:00 PM 90%21 20%1 100%10 32 1 9:00 PM 95%22 20%1 100%10 33 0 10:00 PM 95%22 20%1 50%5 28 5 11:00 PM 100%23 10%1 0%0 24 9 12:00 AM 100%23 5%0 0%0 23 10 Notes: [1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005. [2] Peak parking rates based on City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code parking requirements. [3] Weekday parking rates based on the weekday parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. [5] Parking supply includes marked spaces and estimated valet parked spaces in drive aisle. [4] Gross spaces adjusted (25%) to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, and/or local business and residents walk-in reduction. Conference Center/Banquet Appendix Table C-1 LEISURE HOTEL WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-12-3996-1 Hermosa Boutique Hotel Project Month:Jul Land Use Leisure Hotel Size 30 Rooms 0.695 KSF Peak Pkg Rate[2]1.00 /Room 1.0 /50 SF Weekend Pkg Rate[3]1.00 /Room 1.0 /50 SF Gross Spaces 30 Spaces 14 Spaces Comparison w/ Adjusted Gross 1.00 30 Spaces 0.75 Parking Supply Spaces[4]25 Guest Spc.5 Emp. Spc.10 Spc.Shared 33 Spaces Time % Of # Of % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking Surplus of Day Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Demand (Deficiency) 6:00 AM 95%24 5%0 0%0 24 9 7:00 AM 95%24 30%2 0%0 26 7 8:00 AM 90%23 90%5 30%3 31 2 9:00 AM 80%20 90%5 60%6 31 2 10:00 AM 70%18 100%5 60%6 29 4 11:00 AM 70%18 100%5 60%6 29 4 12:00 PM 65%16 100%5 65%7 28 5 1:00 PM 65%16 100%5 65%7 28 5 2:00 PM 70%18 100%5 65%7 30 3 3:00 PM 70%18 100%5 65%7 30 3 4:00 PM 75%19 90%5 65%7 31 2 5:00 PM 80%20 75%4 100%10 34 (1) 6:00 PM 85%21 60%3 100%10 34 (1) 7:00 PM 85%21 55%3 100%10 34 (1) 8:00 PM 90%23 55%3 100%10 36 (3) 9:00 PM 95%24 55%3 100%10 37 (4) 10:00 PM 95%24 45%2 50%5 31 2 11:00 PM 100%25 45%2 0%0 27 6 12:00 AM 100%25 30%2 0%0 27 6 Notes: [1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005. [2] Peak parking rates based on City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code parking requirements. [3] Weekday parking rates based on the weekday parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. [5] Parking supply includes marked spaces and estimated valet parked spaces in drive aisle. [4] Gross spaces adjusted (25%) to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, and/or local business and residents walk-in reduction. Conference Center/Banquet Appendix Table C-2 LEISURE HOTEL WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] BUILDING AREA:TOTAL NUMBER OF GUEST ROOMS:3021KING ROOM:DOUBLE ROOM:91429 HERMOSA AVENUEHERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTELHERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 9006613101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD - 404PROJECT INFORMATIONLEGAL DESCRIPTION:ADDRESS:ARCHITECT:ZONE:PROJECT C-2CONTACT: ENVIROTECHNO ARCHITECTUREOWNER:SHEET INDEXPROJECT SCOPE:PROJECT DESCRIPTION1429 HERMOSA AVENUEHERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254LOT SIZE:11,516 SQ.FT. SQ. FT.*RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLAHERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL, LLC205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIALOTS 15, 16, 17 AND 18 IN BLOCK 15 OF HERMOSA BEACH, IN THECITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OFCALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1 PAGES 25 AND 26OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAIDCOUNTY.APN 4183-004-028PROPOSED PROJECT IS A (3) THREE STORY BOUTIQUEHOTEL (GROUND LEVEL/ GARAGE+2 STORIES) HAVING ATOTAL OF 30 GUEST ROOMS (10 DOUBLE, 20 KING SIZEGUEST ROOM). IT INCLUDES MULTI-FUNCTION ROOM, GYM,SPA, WITH MULTIPLE OUTDOOR SITTING AREAS.MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:30 FEETNUMBER OF GUEST ROOMS:STANDARD SPACES:2213COMPACT SPACES:ACCESSIBLE SPACES:2PARKING (1 PER GUESTROOM):(*) LOT SIZE BASED UPON SURVEY PREPAREDBY DCi ENGINEERING, INC - JUNE 201237TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES:COMMERCIAL/COMMON AREA:GARAGE AREA:GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AREA:COMMERCIAL/COMMON AREA:UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AREA:GUEST ROOM AREA:COMMERCIAL/COMMON AREA:MIDDLE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AREA:GUEST ROOM AREA:ROOF AREA:PROPOSED MECHANICAL EQUIP. AREA:5% MAX. AREA MECH. EQUIP.:CORRIDOR AREA:OUTDOOR AREA:CORRIDOR AREA:OUTDOOR AREA:BALCONY AREA:BALCONY AREA:TOTAL MIDDLE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AREA:TOTAL UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AREA:TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA:COVER SHEETCS1.0 COVER SHEET - PROJECT DATACIVIL SHEETSC1 SURVEYC2 SURVEYGENERAL SHEETSG1.0 FLOOR AREA ANALYSISARCHITECTURAL SHEETSA1.0 SITE PLANA3.1 GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLANA3.2 MIDDLE LEVEL FLOOR PLANA3.3 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLANA6.0 ROOF LEVEL PLANA7.1 SOUTH ELEVATION AND EAST ELEVATIONA7.2 NORTH ELEVATION AND WEST ELEVATIONLANDSCAPE SHEETSLC.1HARDSCAPE PLAN GROUND LEVELLC.2HARDSCAPE PLAN MIDDLE LEVELLC.3HARDSCAPE PLAN ROOF LEVELLP.1PLANTING PLAN GROUND LEVELLP.2PLANTING PLAN MIDDLE LEVELLP.3PLANTING PLAN UPPER LEVELMR. LUIS DE MORAES, AIAVOICE: (310) 377-7873EMAIL: luis@envirotechno.com2,950 SQ. FT.7,578 SQ. FT.10,528 SQ. FT.1,005 SQ. FT.6,896 SQ. FT.5,891 SQ. FT.901 SQ. FT.7,138 SQ. FT.6,237 SQ. FT.8,821 SQ. FT.293 SQ. FT.441 SQ. FT.1,172 SQ. FT.281 SQ. FT.1,130 SQ. FT.847 SQ. FT.1,136 SQ. FT.1,122 SQ. FT.9,727 SQ. FT.9,995 SQ. FT.30,250 SQ. FT.JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:SHEET TITLE:CHECKED BY:0012-03ENMLDMPROJECT TITLE:CLIENT NAME:09-17-12AS NOTEDHERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL, LLC PLANNING SUBMITTAL - 10/01/2015 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, #404LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066310-377-7873 VOICEe-mail: luis@envirotechno.comwebsite: envirotechno.comINTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE +INTERIOR DESIGNSHEET NO:COVER SHEET - PROJECT DATA JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:SHEET TITLE:CHECKED BY:0012-03ENMLDMPROJECT TITLE:CLIENT NAME:09-17-12AS NOTEDHERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL, LLC PLANNING SUBMITTAL - 10/01/2015 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, #404LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066310-377-7873 VOICEe-mail: luis@envirotechno.comwebsite: envirotechno.comINTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE +INTERIOR DESIGNSHEET NO:SCALE:1/16"=1'-0"GROUND LEVEL PLANSCALE:1/16"=1'-0"MIDDLE LEVEL PLANSCALE:1/16"=1'-0"UPPER LEVEL PLANSCALE:1/16"=1'-0"ROOF LEVEL PLANFLOOR AREA ANALYSIS JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:SHEET TITLE:CHECKED BY:0012-03ENMLDMPROJECT TITLE:CLIENT NAME:09-17-12AS NOTEDHERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL, LLC PLANNING SUBMITTAL - 10/01/2015 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, #404LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066310-377-7873 VOICEe-mail: luis@envirotechno.comwebsite: envirotechno.comINTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE +INTERIOR DESIGNSHEET NO:SITE PLAN - PROPOSEDSITE PLANSCALE:1/8"=1'-0" JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:SHEET TITLE:CHECKED BY:0012-03ENMLDMPROJECT TITLE:CLIENT NAME:09-17-12AS NOTEDHERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL, LLC PLANNING SUBMITTAL - 10/01/2015 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, #404LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066310-377-7873 VOICEe-mail: luis@envirotechno.comwebsite: envirotechno.comINTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE +INTERIOR DESIGNSHEET NO:GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLANGROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLANSCALE:1/4"=1'-0" JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:SHEET TITLE:CHECKED BY:0012-03ENMLDMPROJECT TITLE:CLIENT NAME:09-17-12AS NOTEDHERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL, LLC PLANNING SUBMITTAL - 10/01/2015 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, #404LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066310-377-7873 VOICEe-mail: luis@envirotechno.comwebsite: envirotechno.comINTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE +INTERIOR DESIGNSHEET NO:MIDDLE LEVEL FLOOR PLANMIDDLE LEVEL FLOOR PLANSCALE:1/4"=1'-0" JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:SHEET TITLE:CHECKED BY:0012-03ENMLDMPROJECT TITLE:CLIENT NAME:09-17-12AS NOTEDHERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL, LLC PLANNING SUBMITTAL - 10/01/2015 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, #404LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066310-377-7873 VOICEe-mail: luis@envirotechno.comwebsite: envirotechno.comINTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE +INTERIOR DESIGNSHEET NO:UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLANUPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLANSCALE:1/4"=1'-0" JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:SHEET TITLE:CHECKED BY:0012-03ENMLDMPROJECT TITLE:CLIENT NAME:09-17-12AS NOTEDHERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL, LLC PLANNING SUBMITTAL - 10/01/2015 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, #404LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066310-377-7873 VOICEe-mail: luis@envirotechno.comwebsite: envirotechno.comINTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE +INTERIOR DESIGNSHEET NO:ROOF LEVEL PLANROOF LEVEL PLANSCALE:1/4"=1'-0" JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:SHEET TITLE:CHECKED BY:0012-03ENMLDMPROJECT TITLE:CLIENT NAME:09-17-12AS NOTEDHERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL, LLC PLANNING SUBMITTAL - 10/01/2015 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, #404LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066310-377-7873 VOICEe-mail: luis@envirotechno.comwebsite: envirotechno.comINTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE +INTERIOR DESIGNSHEET NO:ROOF LEVEL CRITICAL POINTS HEIGHT CALCULATIONSROOF LEVEL CRITICAL POINTHEIGHT CALCULATIONSSCALE:1/4"=1'-0" 1'-0"8'-0"1'-3"8'-0"1'-3"9'-0"ROOF EL.44.75SECOND FLOOR F.F.EL.35.75FIRST FLOOR F.F.EL.26.50GROUND FLOOR F.F.EL.16.2510'-3"9'-3"9'-0"30'-0"PROPERTYLINE OPENPROPERTY LINE 30' MAX.HEIGHT30' MAX.HEIGHT45.25'CRITICAL POINTSIDEWALKHERMOSA AVENUEPROPOSEDTRANSFORMER PAD61122455678PROPOSEDTRANSFORMER (FINALELEVATION TO BEVERIFIED)10CP03 49.50' ACT15.57' + 30 = 45.57' MAX.CP05 49.50' ACT15.50' + 30 = 45.50' MAX.CP06 49.50' ACT15.45' + 30 = 45.45' MAX.CP04 49.50' ACT15.53' + 30 = 45.53' MAX.CP01 49.50' ACT15.60' + 30 = 45.60' MAX.CP02 51.00' ACT15.68' + 30 = 45.68' MAX.ROOF EL.44.75SECOND FLOOR F.F.EL.35.75FIRST FLOOR F.F.EL.26.50GROUND FLOOR F.F.EL.16.2530'-0"1'-0"8'-0"1'-3"1'-3"9'-0"8'-0"9'-0"10'-3"9'-3" 30'-0" PROPERTYLINE PROPERTY LINE 30' MAX.HEIGHTSIDEWALKFIFTEENTH STREETFIFTEENTH COURTSHIELDED CONTINUOUSLIGHTINGSHIELDED CONTINUOUSLIGHTINGFULL HEIGHT GLASSPARTITION TYPICAL ATALL EXPOSED SIDES42651256310NON-REFLECTIVE METAL PANELFINIISH SURFACES1TEXTURED GLASS PANEL2NON-REFLECTIVE METAL FASCIA3WIRE-MESH W/WINDOW BEHIND4CURTAINS5GLASS RAILING6LINE OF TRANSFORMER7LINE OF WALL/GATE8FILTERRA ROOF DRAIN SYSTEM AND STORAGEPIPE AND EPIC CHAMBERS - SEE CIVIL SHEETS9REQUIRED ELEVATOR OVERHEAD CLEARANCEAND ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM. STUCCOEXTERIOR FINISH.10SAFETY BEAM REQUIRED PER OSHA 1926.502,VERIFY WITH ELEVATOR MFG. REQUIREMENTS11ELEVATOR PIT - VERIFY REQUIREMENTS PERELEVATOR SPECIFICATIONS12JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:SHEET TITLE:CHECKED BY:0012-03ENMLDMPROJECT TITLE:CLIENT NAME:09-17-12AS NOTEDHERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL, LLC PLANNING SUBMITTAL - 10/01/2015 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, #404LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066310-377-7873 VOICEe-mail: luis@envirotechno.comwebsite: envirotechno.comINTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE +INTERIOR DESIGNSHEET NO:SOUTH ELEVATION AND EAST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATIONSCALE:1/4"=1'-0"SOUTH ELEVATIONSCALE:1/4"=1'-0"BA ROOF EL.44.75SECOND FLOOR F.F.EL.35.75FIRST FLOOR F.F.EL.26.50GROUND FLOOR F.F.EL.16.251'-3"1'-0"8'-0"8'-0"1'-3"9'-0"10'-3"9'-3"9'-0"30'-0"OPENPROPERTY LINE PROPERTYLINE30' MAX.HEIGHT30' MAX.HEIGHTSIDEWALKHERMOSA AVENUEFULL HEIGHT GLASSPARTITION TYPICAL ATALL EXPOSED SIDESFULL HEIGHT GLASSPARTITION TYPICAL ATALL EXPOSED SIDESSTORMWATERTREATMENTSYSTEM9812255665310CP02 51.00' ACT15.68' + 30 = 45.68' MAX.ROOF EL.44.75SECOND FLOOR F.F.EL.35.75FIRST FLOOR F.F.EL.26.50GROUND FLOOR F.F.EL.16.251'-0"8'-0"1'-3"8'-0"1'-3"9'-0"10'-3"9'-3"9'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0"PROPERTYLINE PROPERTY LINE 30' MAX.HEIGHT30' MAX.HEIGHT45.25'CRITICALPOINTFIFTEENTH COURTFIFTEENTH STREET111187914'-11"+ FINAL DIMENSION MAY VERY 1015.59F.S.15.9F.G.18.6F.G.18.5F.G.18.5F.G.16.0F.S.16.1F.S.18.7F.G.96' TALLWALL ANDGATE6' TALLWALL ANDGATELINE OFPROPERTYLINE WALLCP02 51.00' ACT15.68' + 30 = 45.68' MAX.CP06 49.50' ACT15.45' + 30 = 45.45' MAX.NON-REFLECTIVE METAL PANELFINIISH SURFACES1TEXTURED GLASS PANEL2NON-REFLECTIVE METAL FASCIA3WIRE-MESH W/WINDOW BEHIND4CURTAINS5GLASS RAILING6LINE OF TRANSFORMER7LINE OF WALL/GATE8FILTERRA ROOF DRAIN SYSTEM AND STORAGEPIPE AND EPIC CHAMBERS - SEE CIVIL SHEETS9REQUIRED ELEVATOR OVERHEAD CLEARANCEAND ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM. STUCCOEXTERIOR FINISH.10SAFETY BEAM REQUIRED PER OSHA 1926.502,VERIFY WITH ELEVATOR MFG. REQUIREMENTS11ELEVATOR PIT - VERIFY REQUIREMENTS PERELEVATOR SPECIFICATIONS12JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:SHEET TITLE:CHECKED BY:0012-03ENMLDMPROJECT TITLE:CLIENT NAME:09-17-12AS NOTEDHERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL, LLC PLANNING SUBMITTAL - 10/01/2015 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, #404LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066310-377-7873 VOICEe-mail: luis@envirotechno.comwebsite: envirotechno.comINTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE +INTERIOR DESIGNSHEET NO:NORTH ELEVATION AND WEST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATIONSCALE:1/4"=1'-0"NORTH ELEVATIONSCALE:1/4"=1'-0"DC Hhermosa beachHERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL LLC.O2 The Hermosa Beach H20 HOTEL HERMOSA BEACH BOUTIQUE HOTEL 1429 Hermosa Avenue • Hermosa Beach, California 90254 ~ Side by Side Comparison ~ THE HB H20 HOTEL THE SHADE HOTEL 1429 Hermosa Avenue, Hermosa Beach 1221 N. Valley Drive, Manhattan Beach Building Size: 29,931 sq ft Building Size: 29,964 sq ft Year Built: 2017 Year Built: 2005 Proximity to Beach: 1 Short Block Proximity to Beach: 4 Blocks Proximity to LAX: 6.9 Miles Proximity to LAX: 5.1 Miles Total Number of Rooms: 30 Total Number of Rooms: 38 Stories: 3 - Boutique Hotel Stories: 3 - Boutique Hotel Room Rates: $375 - $850 Room Rates: $349 - $649 Approx. Avg. Room Size: 400 sq ft Approx. Avg. Room Size: 410 sq ft Room Features: Fireplace & Patio Room Features: Spa Tub Business Center: Yes Business Center: Yes Amenities: 24 Hour Front Desk Amenities: 24 Hour Front Desk Concierge Service Concierge Service Valet Parking Valet Parking Air Conditioned Air Conditioned Free Wi-Fi Free Wi-Fi Lounge Lounge Fitness Center Fitness Center SUMMARY STANDARD WEEK RATES (Excludes Holidays) Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday 12% Transient Tax $ 97,425.00 Weekly Totals Weekly $ 12,675.00 $ 12,675.00 $ 12,675.00 $ 12,725.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 12,675.00 $ 11,691.00 $5,066,100.00 Annual Totals Annually $ 659,100.00 $659,100.00 $659,100.00 $661,700.00 $884,000.00 $884,000.00 $659,100.00 $ 607,932.00 Vacancy Allowance 25%: Vacancy Allowance 25%: Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday 12% Transient Tax $ (24,356.25) Weekly Totals Weekly $ (3,168.75) $ (3,168.75) $ (3,168.75) $ (3,181.25) $ (4,250.00) $ (4,250.00) $ (3,168.75) $ (2,922.75) (1,266,525.00) Annual Totals Annually $(164,775.00) $(164,775.00) $(164,775.00) $(165,425.00) $(221,000.00) $(221,000.00) $(164,775.00) $(151,983.00) Subtotals: Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday 12% Transient Tax $ 73,068.75 Weekly Totals Subtotals Weekly $ 9,506.25 $ 9,506.25 $ 9,506.25 $ 9,543.75 $ 12,750.00 $ 12,750.00 $ 9,506.25 $ 8,768.25 $3,799,575.00 Annual Totals Subtotals Annually $ 494,325.00 $494,325.00 $494,325.00 $496,275.00 $663,000.00 $663,000.00 $494,325.00 $ 455,949.00 Information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. From: Lou Morales <morales.lou@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:56 PM To: Chhabria, Raju Subject: Re: Hermosa Beach Boutique Hotel Thanks for reaching out. My family would be in support as long as there is adequate parking on the property for all possible hotel guests. Thanks, Louis Morales From: Rich Pola <rich@rpassociates.us> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 5:23 PM To: Chhabria, Raju Subject: Re: Hermosa Beach Boutique Hotel Yes, of course I will support you I am out of town can I sign this next week when I get back or put me down for a full support of your project Richard Pola rich@rpassociates.us Sent from my iPhone Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0831 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES UPDATE:ENERGY LEADER PARTNERSHIP AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN (Continued from meeting of October 13, 2015) (Environmental Analyst Kristy Morris) Recommended Action: Approve Energy Efficiency Measures for inclusion in the city’s Climate Action Plan as outlined. Summary: The City of Hermosa Beach continues to work with the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) to develop programs, undertake activities and to develop a non-binding Climate Action Plan (CAP) that will include strategies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. On June 25, 2013 City Council adopted a resolution approving participation in the Institute for Local Government's recognition program, the Beacon Award: Local Leadership toward Solving Climate Change including acceptance of an Energy Action Plan as part of SCE's Energy Leader Partnership Program. Participating in the Beacon Award program and the SCE Energy Leadership Program is consistent with the Council’s 2020 Strategic Plan, Goal 4- More Livable, Sustainable Beach City and development of a Carbon Neutral Plan which was a "Top Policy Priority" in 2013. The Carbon Neutral Plan was adopted by Council February 24, 2015 and implementing the plan was identified by Council as a “Top Management Priority” for 2015. Participation in the Beacon Award program requires that cities and counties complete municipal and communitywide greenhouse gas inventories, and prepare, or commit to prepare, a CAP. Commencing in 2014, SBCCOG is preparing CAPs for each South Bay City with funding from Southern California Edison (SCE) & Southern California Gas (SCG) to meet goals from the CA Long- Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan. The CAPs are being completed in two phases based on the availability of funding: Phase I - development of energy efficiency strategies and analysis of targets; Phase II - development of waste, greening, power generation/storage, land use and transportation. On February 24, 2015 City Council received the City of Hermosa Beach GHG Inventory, Forecasting, Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0831 and Target-Setting Report, prepared by SBCCOG, in consultation with the City. The report summarizes the City’s greenhouse gas emissions inventory to support development of the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) and other climate planning efforts. The next steps require City Council to review and approve the Energy Efficiency Measures for inclusion in the City’s CAP as outlined. Additional information on the SCE Energy Leadership Program and the Climate Action Plan Energy Efficiency Measures are provided below. Background SCE Energy Leader Partnership The City of Hermosa Beach participates in the Energy Leader Partnership program as a member of South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) who partners with Southern California Edison to implement this program. The SBCCOG provides an on-call energy engineer to assist the city with identifying energy efficiency projects and assisting with the application process for rebates and incentives. Specifically, in 2013 Greg Stevens, Principal at GSE Solutions LLC, conducted a comprehensive energy study of ten (10) municipal facilities to identify and quantify potential energy cost savings opportunities. The report identified four (4) areas for energy cost savings with some showing greater savings than others. Those areas are: Building and Park lighting, HVAC (Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning), Water heating and Street Lighting (Attachment 1). The Energy Leader Partnership program is a tiered system providing increased incentives as the City completes more energy efficiency projects. At the highest level of Platinum, the city can earn as much as 20% kWh savings over and above the current SCE incentive.The City is currently participating in the SCE Energy Leadership Program at the Silver Level and receives quarterly updates on energy use and savings opportunities (Attachment 2). The City will move to the Gold Level once the building and park lighting upgrades are complete. Climate Action Plan Energy Efficiency Measures The CAP is being drafted in line with the goals in AB 32, California's Global Warming Solutions Act, for greenhouse gas reductions. On April 29, 2015, Governor Brown issued a new Executive Order (B -30-15) to establish a California greenhouse gas reduction target of 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. The State’s California Climate Change Scoping Plan emission target for 2020 and 2050 are 15% and 80% respectively below the baseline. The executive order and scoping plan are not requirements for local governments, but may inform future legislation and be the criteria for grant eligibility. The SBCCOG is currently preparing Climate Action Plans for each of the South Bay cities, including Hermosa Beach, to serve as a roadmap for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in City operations and the community at large. The CAP will include a list of possible emission reducing actions organized by sector (energy, waste, greening, power generation/storage, land use, and transportation) and a time frame for implementation (short-term, 1-3 years from CAP adoption; Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0831 medium term, 3-5 years from adoption; and long term, 5-10 years from adoption). It will also include GHG emission inventories to assess potential reductions and chart progress. Importantly, the plan does not include financial analysis of the cost-effectiveness of each measure. On February 24, 2015 City Council accepted the Hermosa Beach Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan, adopted a municipal carbon neutral target of 2020, and directed staff to commence implementation of Municipal Carbon Neutral Action Plan. The Hermosa Beach Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan is a specific plan to neutralize gross emissions in support of an aggressive 2020 carbon neutrality goal for municipal facilities and operations. The Carbon Neutral Municipal Plan identifies many potential pathways that the City of Hermosa Beach can take toward achieving climate and renewable energy goals. Directly following the acceptance of the Plan, City Council authorized the Brendle Group (Fort Collins, CO) to develop a Municipal Carbon Neutral Tool to assist with prioritizing implementation measures based on cost-effectiveness and emissions reductions. Furthermore, the City of Hermosa Beach is currently completing a General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan Update. These comprehensive plans for the City's future development and change focus on sustainability and a low-carbon future. The policies and recommendations described in both the draft General Plan Update and Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan have been reviewed by SBCCOG CAP consultants to promote consistency between the CAP measures and these guiding documents. These existing plans will take precedence when assessing, prioritizing and implementing future projects and policies. For example, the City of Hermosa Beach Energy Study Report (GSE, 2013) and Climate Action Plan Energy Efficiency Measures identify replacing the HVAC system as a measure to reduce emissions, however, the Municipal Carbon Neutral Tool has shown this not to be cost-effective and therefore would not be implemented. Analysis: The Energy Efficiency Measures for the CAP were developed based on the City's current operations, goals, and plans for reducing energy use both at the municipal and community level. Staff worked with the SBCCOG, and their CAP consultant Atkins, to identify additional measures that will help the City achieve reductions in line with the state's goals and direction. The SBCCOG also provided potential gains that the City can capture through subregional measures. Through the SBCCOG work, GHG inventories were completed for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 (Attachment 3). The 2005 inventory year is the baseline and reductions for forecasts are based on 2012 to take into account all known reductions. GHG emission in the City are primarily split between energy and transportation sources -- approximately 52/48. It is estimated that the City could reach reductions equal to state goals by 2035 if the proposed energy efficiency measures are implemented at the level of effort describe for each on the attached memo (Attachments 4 and 5). Overall, it is estimated that the City should reach reductions equal to state goals by 2020 if the Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0831 proposed measures are implemented at the level of effort described for each on the attached memo. In addition, many of the energy reduction measures are already identified in existing plans that are currently being implemented at a level equivalent to, or greater than, the Climate Action Plan (CAP). In conclusion, the CAP is a guide for reducing carbon, however, ultimately implementation will be determined by City Council based on the level of carbon-reduction and cost-effectiveness of the proposed measure. Fiscal Implications: No fiscal impact for the development of the Climate Action Plan and no significant impact for implementing ongoing Municipal and Community Energy Efficiency Measures. Attachments: 1 City of Hermosa Beach Energy Study Report (GSE, 2013). 2. Energy Leader Partnership 3rd Quarter 2015 Report 3. City of Hermosa Beach GHG Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report 4. Municipal Energy Reduction Measures 5. Community Energy Reduction Measures 6. Energy Reduction Measures Presentation Respectfully Submitted by: Kristy Morris, Environmental Analyst Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™ GSE Solutions LLC | 800 Grand Avenue, Suite B8B, Carlsbad CA 92008 | 760.214.6805 September 15, 2013 Mr. Tom Bakaly City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 SUBJECT: City of Hermosa Beach Energy Study Report Dear Mr. Bakaly: On behalf of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG), GSE Solutions (GSE) is pleased to submit to you the results of the comprehensive energy study we conducted over the last several months. GSE performed comprehensive energy auditsof the following ten (10) facilities to identify and quantify potential energy cost savings opportunities: Community Center (710 Pier Ave) City Hall (1315 Valley Dr) Police Department (540 Pier Ave) Fire Department (540 Pier Ave) Clark Park & Building (861 Valley Dr) City Yard (555 6th St) South Park (425 Valley Dr) Valley Park (2521 Valley Dr) Pier (1 Pier Ave) Street lights (Utility-owned and City-owned) There are four (4) general areas in which energy cost savings opportunities were identified: Building and Park Lighting, HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning), Water Heating and Street Lighting. In Table 1 on the following page, the identified savings opportunities are listed in order of cost- effectiveness. GSE Solutions LLC | 800 Grand Avenue, Suite B8B, Carlsbad CA 92008 | 760.214.6805 Table 1. Summary of Energy Audit Results Cost Savings Opportunity Annual Baseline Energy Usage Annual Proposed Energy Usage Annual Energy Savings % Energy Savings Annual Cost Savings ($) Cash Incentives ($) Project Costs ($) Annual GHG Savings (Tons CO2e) Simple Payback (Yrs) Domestic Hot Water (Electric, kWh)1,552 1,086 466 30%$64 -$194 0.4 3.0 Building Park Lighting 467,176 199,124 268,053 57%$45,469 $44,970 $348,833 206.8 6.7 Street Lights (LS-2/LS-3)388,886 248,109 140,777 36%$12,357 $23,932 $213,609 108.6 15.4 Street Lights (LS-1)105,661 25,796 79,865 76%$23,792 $13,577 $226,457 61.6 8.9 Domestic Hot Water (Gas, therms)2,309 1,617 693 30%$92 $289 $1,760 3.8 16.0 HVAC (electric)188,878 153,614 35,264 19%$4,900 $89 $164,458 27.2 33.5 Total 1,154,463 629,346 525,117 45%$86,674 $82,857 $955,310 408 10.1 Notes: LS-2 and LS-3 street lights are City-owned. LS-1 street lights are SCE-owned. GSE Solutions LLC | 800 Grand Avenue, Suite B8B, Carlsbad CA 92008 | 760.214.6805 Project Implementation Strategy It is recommended that the City begin immediately the process of implementing the first three projects listed in Table 1. The remaining projects can be carried out as additional funding becomes available. To accomplish this effort in the most cost-effective way, the City should consider taking advantage of SCE’s On-Bill Financing (OBF) program to the fullest extent possible. Through OBF, the City can fund qualified energy efficiency projects at zero interest and with no fees. For qualified projects, the City will repay the loan from SCE in monthly installments which would be added as a line item on the City’s electric bill. To qualify for this program, a projectmust be eligible for incentives and meet the required 10 year simple payback. The City is allowed to borrow up to $250,000 per service account, with a $1 million city-wide cap. Based on GSE’s analysis, the Building and Park Lighting and City-owned Street Light projects appear to be eligible for OBF at this time, while the other projects do not currently qualify either because incentives are not available or the project’s simple payback period exceeds 10 years. Once the Building and Park Lighting and City-owned Street Light projects are installed and final approval is granted by SCE, the City would be reimbursed the out-of-pocket costs for both projects, estimated to be $562,442. This money could then be used to fund other projects that do not qualify for OBF. Even though the SCE-owned Street Light project does not currently qualify for OBF, it could become eligible if the City were to purchase the “concrete” streetlight poles from SCE before installing the proposed LED fixtures. SCE fixtures on “wood” poles are not available for purchase at this time. The cost to purchase the “concrete” LS-1 poles (estimated at $123,600) could be covered with a portion of the OBF reimbursement payment of $562,442 the City receives for implementing the Building and Park Lighting and City-owned Street Light projects. Or project funding could come from the City’s capital improvement budget. At this point, the City could apply for an OBF loan in the amount of $102,857 to install the proposed LED fixtures on the recently purchased poles. Again, once SCE grants final approval of the installed project, the City will be reimbursed the out-of-pocket costs of the LED retrofit project. This should leave enough funds to implement the remaining Domestic Hot Water and HVAC projects. Detailed Audit results Current annual energy consumption and costs for each facility that was audited are contained in Table 2 below. Table 2. Current Annual Energy Usage and Cost for Audited Facilities Facility Address Annual Electricity kWh Annual Electricity $ Annual Natural Gas therms Annual Natural Gas $ Community Center 710 Pier Ave 250,670 $34,538 467 $626 City Hall 1315 Valley Dr 467,428 $56,413 2,230 $2,565Police Department GSE Solutions LLC | 800 Grand Avenue, Suite B8B, Carlsbad CA 92008 | 760.214.6805 Facility Address Annual Electricity kWh Annual Electricity $ Annual Natural Gas therms Annual Natural Gas $ Fire Department Clark Park & Building 861 Valley Dr 80,716 $28,890 846 $1,371 City Yard 555 6th St 28,227 $4,593 875 $1,094 South Park 425 Valley Dr 21,317 $3,519 0 $0 Valley Park 2521 Valley Dr 14,852 $2,517 0 $0 Pier 1 Pier Ave 33,324 $2,244 0 $0 Street lights LS-1 Multiple 456,772 $136,087 0 $0 Street lights LS-2 Multiple 364,276 $32,160 0 $0 Total 1,717,582 $132,714 4,418 $5,655 Building and Park Lighting Existing interior lighting consists mainly of linear fluorescent tubes, with a blend of compact fluorescent, incandescent and halogen lamps. Current exterior lighting is a mixture of metal halide, high pressure sodium and halogen fixtures. The interior lighting should be upgraded to more efficient linear fluorescent tubes and LED lamps. A majority of the exterior lighting should be replaced with LED fixtures. Table 3, below, summarizes the economic benefits of upgrading interior and exterior lighting in the identified facilities. Table 3. Economic Benefits of Lighting Upgrades per Facility Facility Annual Baseline kWh/yr Annual Proposed kWh/yr Annual Savings kWh/yr % Annual Energy Savings Annual Energy Cost Savings ($) Incentives ($) Project Costs ($) Simple Payback (Yrs) Community Center 165,243 89,318 75,925 46%$10,646 $9,643 $92,780 7.8 City Hall 59,263 16,621 42,642 72%$6,436 $8,850 $61,103 8.1 Police Department 59,683 20,422 39,261 66%$5,919 $7,425 $43,870 6.2 Fire Department 32,841 14,470 18,372 56%$2,713 $2,807 $19,726 6.2 Clark Park & Building 56,141 25,206 30,935 55%$11,963 $5,373 $46,756 3.5 City Yard 27,968 11,926 16,042 57%$2,596 $2,941 $19,148 6.2 South Park 23,299 7,211 16,088 69%$2,651 $2,997 $30,454 10.4 Valley Park 14,709 8,915 5,794 39%$981 $1,006 $15,930 15.2 Pier 28,030 5,036 22,995 82%$1,564 $3,928 $19,065 9.7 GSE Solutions LLC | 800 Grand Avenue, Suite B8B, Carlsbad CA 92008 | 760.214.6805 Facility Annual Baseline kWh/yr Annual Proposed kWh/yr Annual Savings kWh/yr % Annual Energy Savings Annual Energy Cost Savings ($) Incentives ($) Project Costs ($) Simple Payback (Yrs) Total 467,176 199,124 268,053 57%$45,469 $44,970 $348,833 6.7 Street Lights The City’s estimated existing street lamp inventory per SCE account is listed below in Table 4. Only “concrete” streetlight poles are included. Table 4. Hermosa Beach Street Lamp Inventory (Concrete Poles) Fixture Wattages1 # of Poles LS-12 # of Poles LS-23 # of Poles LS-34 # of Poles Total 50W 0 0 0 0 70W 6 0 0 6 100W 187 54 247 488 150W 1 0 0 1 200W 12 7 92 111 250W 0 0 0 0 400W 0 0 0 0 Total 206 61 339 606 1. All fixtures are assumed to be High Pressure Sodium fixtures. 2. Utility-owned poles, unmetered. 3. City-owned poles, unmetered. 4. City-owned poles, metered. A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of upgrading the City’s high pressure sodium street lights to a more efficient LED technology is summarized in Table 5 below. Results are included for both City-owned (LS-2 and LS-3) and SCE-owned (LS-1). In the case of SCE-owned fixtures, only “concrete poles” were considered at this time. Additionally, the financial benefits converting unmetered accounts (LS-1 and LS- 2) to a meter account (LS-3) were evaluated. Table 5. Economic Benefits of Upgrading Street Lights Cost Savings Opportunity Annual Baseline Energy Usage Annual Proposed Energy Usage Annual Energy Savings Annual Cost Savings ($) Cash Incentives ($) Project Costs ($) Simple Payback (Yrs) Street Lights (LS-2/LS-3)388,886 248,109 140,777 36%$12,357 $23,932 15.4 Street Lights (LS-1)105,661 25,796 79,865 76%$23,792 $13,577 8.9 GSE Solutions LLC | 800 Grand Avenue, Suite B8B, Carlsbad CA 92008 | 760.214.6805 HVAC The HVAC systems at the Civic Center and Community Center were evaluated for potential energy and cost savings. The results are summarized in Table 6 on the following page. Table 6. Economic Benefits of HVAC Upgrades Facility Annual Baseline kWh/yr Annual Proposed kWh/yr Annual Savings kWh/yr % Annual Energy Savings Annual Energy Cost Savings ($) Incentives ($) Project Costs ($) Simple Payback (Yrs) City Hall 44,517 37,843 6,674 15.0%$806 -$46,090 57.2 Police Department 69,758 57,378 12,380 17.7%$1,494 -$34,568 23.1 Community Center 74,603 58,393 16,210 21.7%$2,600 $89 $83,800 32.2 Total 188,878 153,614 35,264 18.7%$4,900 $89 $164,458 33.5 Domestic Hot Water Domestic hot water heaters at several facilities were evaluated for potential energy and cost savings. The results are summarized below in Table 7. Table 7. Economic Benefits of Upgrading Domestic Hot Water Heaters Facility Annual Baseline Usage Annual Proposed Usage Annual Energy Savings % Annual Energy Savings Annual Energy Cost Savings ($) Incentives ($) Project Costs ($) Simple Payback (Yrs) Police Department (Gas, therms) 514 360 154 30%$18 $107 $440 18.8 Fire Department (Gas, therms)1426 998 428 30%$58 $75 $440 6.3 Community Center (Electric, kWh) 1,552 1,086 466 30%$64 -$194 3.0 Clark Building (Gas, therms)259 181 78 30%$13 $75 $440 29.0 City Yard (Gas, therms)110 77 33 30%$4 $32 $440 98.6 Total Therms 2,309 1,617 693 30.0%$92 $289 $1,760 16.0 Total kWh 1,552 1,086 466 30.0%$64 -$194 3.0 GSE Solutions LLC | 800 Grand Avenue, Suite B8B, Carlsbad CA 92008 | 760.214.6805 Limitations and Disclaimer The intent of this energy study report is to estimate energy and cost savings associated with the recommended equipment upgrades for lighting, HVAC and domestic hot water. Appropriate detail is included in this report to facilitate making a decision about implementing any of these measures at this facility. However, this report is not intended as a detailed engineering design document. While the recommendations in this report have been reviewed for technical accuracy and are believed to be reasonably accurate, the findings are estimates and actual results may vary. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Greg W. Stevens, Principal GSE Solutions, LLC 760.214.6805 gstevens@gse-solutions.com Local Governments in Action Carson • El Segundo • Gardena • Hawthorne • Hermosa Beach • Inglewood • Lawndale • Lomita • Los Angeles • Manhattan Beach Palos Verdes Estates • Rancho Palos Verdes • Redondo Beach • Rolling Hills • Rolling Hills Estates • Torrance • Los Angeles County www.sbesc.com | 310.371.7222 What’s Been Done Since January 2010 Energy Saving Projects Electric Savings Annual kWh Natural Gas Savings Annual Therms Incentive Cash to General Fund2 Energy Cost Savings Annual3 Annual GHG Emissions Reduction4 Completed 170,169 0 $80,121 $25,490 131 In-Progress 367,088 0 $44,859 $51,524 283 Planned ----- Identified 79,865 0 $13,577 $23,161 62 1. Based on 2010 utility data. 2. One-time utility incentives earned and placed directly into general fund. Values include gas & electric. SCE Direct Install project cost savings included. 3. Annual energy savings based on achieving Title 24 standards. Actual savings could be higher. Values include gas & electric. 4. Tons C02Emissions. Completed Project Detail 13th Street Parking Structure Lighting Retrofit 10.0% ROI | $69,523 investment | $5,958 annual savings | $9,474 incentive | $2,400 SBESC service value Multiple Buildings Lighting Upgrades (Direct Install Project) $0 investment | $18,502 annual savings | $69,509 project value | $4,800 SBESC service value Opportunities for Reducing Operating Costs 5. Facilities in need of an energy audit, based on 2010 data. 6. For electric only facilities, % cost is based on all municipal electric accounts. Otherwise % cost is based on all municipal electric and gas accounts. 7. Includes Utility-owned (LS-1) and City-owned (LS-2/LS-3) street lights. City of Hermosa Beach Energy Savings At A Glance Quarterly Report Q3 2015 Prepared by The South Bay Environmental Services Center November 10, 2015 Total Annual Energy Use – All Municipal Facilities 1 Electricity = 1,941,960 kWh | Natural Gas = 4,621 Therms | Cost = $394,619 Priority Facilities5 Annual Energy Expense Electricity Consumption Annual kWh Natural Gas Consumption Annual Therms Fraction of City’s Energy Costs 6 Street Lighting7 $158,046 773,707 0 46.0% City Hall $59,882 440,960 2,858 15.2% Community Center $34,464 218,777 567 8.7% City Yard $7,143 36,337 815 1.8% City of Hermosa Beach GHG Inventory, Forecasting, Target-Setting Report for an Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan January 2015 Prepared for: Prepared by: 3570 Carmel Mountain Road, Suite 300 San Diego, California 92130 Funded by: Local Government Strategic Plan Strategies Program Under the auspices of the California Public Utilities Commission Contents i Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ iii Key Findings ................................................................................................................................................. iv Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 GHG Emissions Inventories ........................................................................................................................... 2 Emissions Reporting ............................................................................................................................... 2 Emissions Sectors ...................................................................................................................... 2 Calculation Methodology .......................................................................................................... 4 Community Emissions ............................................................................................................................ 4 2005—2012 Emissions Summary .............................................................................................. 5 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Inventories ................................................................................... 6 Energy ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Municipal Emissions ............................................................................................................................. 11 2005—2012 Emissions Summary ............................................................................................ 11 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Inventories ................................................................................. 13 Energy ...................................................................................................................................... 15 Inventory Forecasts ..................................................................................................................................... 17 Business-as-Usual Forecasts ................................................................................................................. 17 Community Business-as-Usual Forecast .................................................................................. 18 Municipal Business-as-Usual Forecast .................................................................................... 19 Adjusted Business-as-Usual Forecasts ................................................................................................. 19 Community Adjusted Business-as-Usual Forecast .................................................................. 20 Municipal Adjusted Business-as-Usual Forecast ..................................................................... 21 Reduction Targets ....................................................................................................................................... 22 Recommended Community Targets ..................................................................................................... 22 Recommended Municipal Targets ........................................................................................................ 23 Conclusions and Next Steps ........................................................................................................................ 25 References .................................................................................................................................................. 26 Appendix A: Glossary of Terms Appendix B: Methodology ii Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Tables Table 1. Key Terms in the Report .................................................................................................................. 1 Table 2. GHGs Analyzed in the Inventories .................................................................................................. 2 Table 3. Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector for 2005 and 2012 .................................................... 6 Table 4. Community GHG Emissions for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 ........................................................ 7 Table 5. Activity Data used in 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Community Inventories ................................... 8 Table 6. Demographic Data for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 ....................................................................... 9 Table 7. Activity Data and GHG Emissions of Energy in 2005 and 2012 ....................................................... 9 Table 8. Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector for 2005 and 2012 .............................................................. 12 Table 9. Municipal GHG Emissions for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 .......................................................... 13 Table 10. Activity Data used in 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Municipal Inventories .................................. 14 Table 11. Activity Data and GHG Emissions of Energy in 2005 and 2012 ................................................... 15 Table 12. Growth Factors for 2012, 2020, and 2035 .................................................................................. 18 Table 13. Community BAU Forecast ........................................................................................................... 18 Table 14. Municipal BAU Forecast .............................................................................................................. 19 Table 15. Community Adjusted BAU Emissions .......................................................................................... 21 Table 16. Municipal Adjusted BAU Emissions ............................................................................................. 21 Table 17. State-Aligned GHG Reduction Targets ........................................................................................ 22 Table 18. State-Aligned Municipal GHG Reduction Targets ....................................................................... 23 Figures Figure 1. Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector for 2005 and 2012 ................................................... 5 Figure 2. Community GHG Emissions for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 ........................................................ 6 Figure 3. GHG Emissions for Community Electricity and Natural Gas, by Sector ....................................... 10 Figure 4. Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector for 2005 and 2012 .............................................................. 12 Figure 5. Municipal GHG Emissions for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 ......................................................... 13 Figure 6. GHG Emissions for Municipal Electricity and Natural Gas, by Sector .......................................... 16 Figure 7. Community Emissions Inventories, Projections, and Targets ...................................................... 23 Figure 8. Municipal Emissions Inventories, Projections, and Targets ......................................................... 24 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations iii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations AB Assembly Bill ADC Alternative Daily Cover BAU Business-as-Usual CAFE Corporate Average Fuel Economy CH4 Methane CARB California Air Resources Board CIWMB California Integrated Waste Management Board CO2 Carbon Dioxide CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalents EECAP Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan EO Executive Order GHG Greenhouse Gas GWP Global Warming Potential IEAP International Local Government GHG Emissions Analysis Protocol IFT Inventories, Long-Term Forecasts, and Target-Setting IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change JWPCP Joint Water Pollution Control Plant kWh Kilowatt-hour LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard LGOP Local Government Operations Protocol MT Metric Tons NDN Nitrification/denitrification N2O Nitrous Oxide RPS Renewable Portfolio Standard RTP Regional Transportation Plan SBCCOG South Bay Cities Council of Governments SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCE Southern California Edison SCG Southern California Gas Company SEEC Statewide Energy Efficiency Collaborative iv Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Key Findings Community  The City of Hermosa Beach decreased emissions 7.7% from 2005 to 2012, from 137,160 MT CO2e to 126,611 MT CO2e.  On-Road Transportation, Commercial Energy, Solid Waste, Water, and Off-Road Sources sector emissions decreased while Residential Energy and Wastewater sectors increased emissions from 2005 to 2012.  Energy-related emissions account for about 40% of the total community emissions.  Under the Adjusted Business-as-Usual (BAU) forecast, emissions will be 111,690 MT CO2e in 2020 and 94,162 MT CO2e in 2035. These emissions levels are 19% lower in 2020 than 2005 and 31% lower than 2005 by 2035.  The City should choose a reduction target that is feasible and ambitious. The State recommends a 15% reduction below 2005 levels by 2020, which would be achieved under the Adjusted BAU scenario.  To continue reductions consistent with the State’s long-term emissions reduction goal of lowering emissions 80% below 1990 levels by 2050, the City would need to reduce emissions in 2035 by 24,210 MT CO2e from an Adjusted BAU forecast. This is a 24% reduction from the Adjusted BAU emissions level and would achieve a 49% reduction from 2005 levels. Municipal  Municipal emissions have decreased 9% from 2005 to 2012, from 1,501MT CO2e to 1,372 MT CO2e.  Emissions in all sectors decreased between 2005 and 2012 except for the Vehicle Fleet & Equipment and SCE-Owned Outdoor Lights.  Municipal energy use accounts for approximately 1% of all emissions.  Under the Adjusted BAU forecast, emissions will be 1,751 MT CO2e in 2020 and 1,872 MT CO2e in 2035. These emissions levels are 17% higher in 2020 than 2005 and 25% higher than 2005 by 2035.  The City would need to reduce emissions by 1,751 MT CO2e from the 2020 Adjusted BAU emissions level to meet its carbon neutrality goal by 2020. Introduction 1 Introduction The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Inventories, Long-Term Forecasts, and Target-Setting (IFT) Report contains the first steps toward the City of Hermosa Beach (City) identifying energy-efficiency measures in an Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan (EECAP). The inventories describe historic energy use and GHG emissions and the forecasts describe projected future emissions in the City. The target-setting section describes GHG reduction recommendations that are consistent with State goals and may assist the City in establishing local GHG reduction targets. The inventories and recommended reduction targets will help the City in the next step of the EECAP, which is to identify energy efficiency and GHG reduction measures that are relevant, meaningful, and feasible. Specifically, the IFT Report includes (words and phrases in bold are described in Table 1):  Historic GHG emissions in community inventories and municipal inventories for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012;  Future GHG emissions for 2020 and 2035 under a business-as-usual forecast scenario and adjusted business-as-usual forecast scenario; and  Recommended GHG reduction targets for 2020 and 2035. Table 1. Key Terms in the Report1 Term Definition Adjusted business-as-usual A GHG forecast scenario that accounts for known policies and regulations that will affect future emissions. Generally, these are state and federal initiatives that will reduce emissions from the business-as-usual scenario. Baseline year The inventory year used for setting targets and comparing future inventories against. Business-as-usual A GHG forecast scenario that assumes no change in policy affecting emissions since the most recent inventory. Changes in emissions are driven primarily through changes in demographics. Community Inventory GHG emissions that result from the activities by residents and businesses in the city. An inventory reports emissions that occur over a single calendar year. Emission factors The GHG-intensity of an activity. Municipal Inventory GHG emissions that result from the activities performed as part of the government operations in the city and are a subset of the community inventory. An inventory reports emissions that occur over a single calendar year. Reduction targets GHG emissions levels not to be exceeded by a specific date. Local reduction targets are often informed by state recommendations and different targets may be established for different years. Sector A subset of the emissions inventory classified by a logical grouping such as economic or municipal-specific category. 1 A glossary of terms is also included as Appendix A. 2 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach GHG Emissions Inventories GHG emissions inventories are the foundation of planning for future reductions. Establishing an existing inventory of emissions helps to identify and categorize the major sources of emissions currently being produced. In this report, four years of historic inventories are presented to show not only the major sources of emissions in the City, but also how those sources vary over time. For both the community and municipal inventories, the years 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 are presented. The 2005 inventory (for both community and municipal operations) is considered the baseline year. A baseline year is established as a starting point against which other inventories may be compared and targets may be set, and is generally the earliest year with a full emissions inventory. The most recent inventory (2012) has the most relevant data for planning purposes, while the interim years (2007 and 2010) provide context and may help identify trends or anomalies. Emissions Reporting The primary GHGs from the community and municipal operations are from carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Because each of these gases has a different capacity for trapping heat in the atmosphere, known as its global warming potential (GWP), a method of reporting is needed to be able to compare gases in the same terms. As a result, emissions are reported in carbon dioxide equivalents, or CO2e, with each GHG normalized and calculated relative to CO2 using its GWP. Table 2 describes the GHGs analyzed in this report, their symbol, GWP, and primary community sources of emissions. While N2O has the highest GWP and may be considered the most dangerous on a per- molecule basis, CO2 is by far the most prevalent, accounting for 88% of statewide emissions in 2005 (CARB 2011). Table 2. GHGs Analyzed in the Inventories Greenhouse Gas Symbol Global Warming Potential Primary Community Sources Carbon Dioxide CO2 1 Fossil fuel combustion Methane CH4 25 Fossil fuel combustion, landfills, wastewater treatment Nitrous Oxide N2O 298 Fossil fuel combustion, wastewater treatment Source: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, 2007. Emissions Sectors The inventories identify the major sources of GHGs emissions caused by activities in sectors that are specific to community or municipal activities. A sector is a subset of the economy, society, or municipal operations whose components share similar characteristics. An emissions sector can also contain subsectors that provide more specificity about the source of emissions (e.g., natural gas and electricity are subsectors of the energy sector). GHG Emissions Inventories 3 As mentioned above, inventories were completed for the community and municipal operations. Because the majority of municipal activities occur within the boundaries of the City and therefore contribute to the overall emissions of the community, both inventories are interconnected, with the municipal inventory considered a subset of the community inventory. As a result, municipal emissions are included in numbers reported for the community. The municipal inventory is separated to highlight areas of emissions that the City has more direct control over and to identify where they can begin to set examples for the community on how reduction strategies can be implemented. The following subsections describe the sectors used in the community and municipal inventories. It is important to note that both inventories capture similar types of information but may be categorized differently. For example, energy is reported in both the community and municipal inventory, but community level energy emissions are reported as “Residential” and “Non-residential”, whereas municipal energy emissions are more logically reported as “Buildings & Facilities” and “Streetlights”.2 Community Sectors The community inventory is categorized by sectors based on the sector’s ability to be affected through regional and local programs, incentives, zoning, and other policies. The City’s community inventories were divided into the following sectors:  Energy in the Community Inventory is further broken down into two sectors: o Commercial/Industrial Energy includes emissions from electricity and natural gas consumption in non-residential buildings and facilities (including outdoor lighting) in the City. o Residential Energy includes emissions from electricity and natural gas consumption in residential buildings in the City.  On-road Transportation includes emissions from vehicle fuel use in trips wholly within the City (in-boundary) and trips that either originate or end in the City (cross-boundary). Emissions from in-boundary trips are fully accounted for in the inventory, whereas only half of the emissions from cross-boundary trips are accounted for. Trips that pass-through the City, (such as on State Route 1) are not accounted for in the inventory because the City has little or no control of these emissions. As a result, this methodology reflects only trips or parts of trips within City borders that the City has the ability to affect.  Solid Waste includes emissions from waste that is generated in the community and sent to landfills.  Water includes emissions from the electricity used to source, treat, and deliver imported water in the community that is not accounted for in the community utility data.  Wastewater includes emissions from treating wastewater generated in the community. 2 Streetlights are further categorized as SCE-owned or City-owned as described later. 4 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach  Off-road Sources include emissions from operating equipment for construction, commercial, light industrial and agricultural activities; lawn and garden equipment; and recreational vehicles such as all-terrain vehicles. Municipal Sectors Sources of municipal emissions are divided into the following sectors:  Energy in the municipal inventory is further broken down into four sectors: o Buildings and Facilities includes energy use by the government, including electricity and natural gas. o SCE-owned Outdoor Lighting includes energy for streetlights on fixtures owned by SCE and outdoor lighting. o City-owned Outdoor Lighting includes energy for streetlights on fixtures owned by the City, traffic control signals, and outdoor lighting. o Water Pumping & Irrigation includes energy for water pumping and irrigation.  Vehicle Fleet & Equipment includes emissions from vehicles owned or operated by the government or contracted by the City for services such as street cleaning. It also includes equipment, such as emergency generators.  Employee Commute includes emissions from fuel use in vehicle trips by municipal employees commuting to and from work in the City.  Solid Waste includes emissions from waste generated by municipal employees or at municipally owned facilities. Calculation Methodology GHG emissions were calculated using activity data available (e.g., kilowatt-hours of electricity) for each sector and protocols for converting activity data to emissions output using relevant emission factors. Emission factors relate the activity to GHG emissions and may vary by year (e.g., for electricity) and often are not affected by local actions or behavior, unlike activity data. The U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions (ICLEI 2012) and the Local Government Operations Protocol for the Quantification and Reporting of GHG Emissions Inventories (LGOP) (CARB 2010) were the primary protocols used for developing the community and municipal inventories, respectively. Activity data are reported in the community and municipal emissions subsections below, and emission factors are detailed in Appendix B. Community Emissions The community inventory includes the GHG emissions that result from activities within City boundaries. This section presents the findings of the community inventory for four years: 2005 (baseline year), 2007, 2010, and 2012. It also provides more specific detail and findings on the energy sectors, which will form the basis of the reduction targets and reduction measures the City identifies in the EECAP. GHG Emissions Inventories 5 2005—2012 Emissions Summary  The City of Hermosa Beach reduced emissions 7.7% from 2005 to 2012, from 137,160 MT CO2e to 126,611 MT CO2e.  On-Road Transportation, Commercial Energy, Solid Waste, Water, and Off-Road Sources sector emissions decreased while Residential Energy and Wastewater sectors increased emissions from 2005 to 2012. As shown in Figure 1 and Table 3, the On-Road Transportation sector was the largest contributor to emissions in both 2005 (54%) and 2012 (54%) by producing 73,567 MT CO2e in 2005 and 68,235 MT CO2e in 2012. This change represents a 7.2% decrease in emissions from 2005 to 2012. Residential energy is the second-largest contributor to emissions, accounting for 23% of emissions in 2005 and 27% in 2012. This change represents a 4.7% increase from 2005 to 2012, from 32,293 MT CO2e to 33,808 MT CO2e. The proportion of emissions from the Commercial sector decreased 12.7% from 2005 to 2012, from 20,280 MT CO2e to 17,830 MT CO2e. Solid waste comprised 4% of the total (6,015 MT CO2e) in 2005, but accounted for 3% of the total (3,334 MT CO2e) in 2012. Water, Wastewater, and Off-road sources made up the remaining emissions in each year. Water and Off-Road Transportation emissions declined from 2005 to 2012; however, Wastewater sources increased 13.5% (from 52 to 59 MT CO2e) in the same period. Figure 1. Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector for 2005 and 2012 54% 15% 23% 4% 3% <1% 1% 2005 54% 14% 27% 3% 2% <1% <1% 2012 On-Road Transportation Commercial Energy Residential Energy Solid Waste Water Wastewater Off-Road Sources 6 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Table 3. Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector for 2005 and 2012 Sector 2005 (MT CO2e) 2012 (MT CO2e) % Change 2005 to 2012 On-Road Transportation 73,567 68,235 -7.2% Residential Energy 32,293 33,808 4.7% Commercial Energy 20,280 17,830 -12.1% Solid Waste 6,015 3,334 -44.6% Water 4,065 2,600 -36.0% Off-Road Sources 888 745 -16.1% Wastewater 52 59 13.5% Total 137,160 126,611 -7.7% 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Inventories Figure 2 and Table 4 show the GHG emissions by sector for all inventory years. Emissions are variable among the inventory years, and may reflect changes in the economy, weather, and programs implemented to reduce emissions. The table also lists the percentage of each sector relative to total emissions and shows that the proportion of each sector does not vary greatly by year. Figure 2. Community GHG Emissions for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 - 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 2005 2007 2010 2012MT CO2e Off-Road Sources Wastewater Water Solid Waste Residential Energy Commercial Energy On-Road Transportation GHG Emissions Inventories 7 Table 4. Community GHG Emissions for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Sector 2005 (MT CO2e) % of Total 2007 (MT CO2e) % of Total 2010 (MT CO2e) % of Total 2012 (MT CO2e) % of Total On-road Transportation 73,567 54% 71,863 54% 70,277 55% 68,235 54% Residential Energy 32,293 24% 31,964 24% 32,700 26% 33,808 27% Commercial Energy 20,280 15% 19,792 15% 18,372 14% 17,830 14% Solid Waste 6,015 4% 4,584 3% 3,510 3% 3,334 3% Water 4,065 3% 3,942 3% 2,552 2% 2,600 2% Off-Road Sources 888 1% 588 <1% 419 <1% 745 1% Wastewater 52 <1% 35 <1% 59 <1% 59 <1% Total 137,160 132,768 127,889 126,611 % Change from 2005 -- -3.2% -6.8% -7.7% Activity data can provide more insight into behavioral changes in the community, as these data are not affected by emission factors. Table 5 summarizes activity data for each sector and subsector. The activity data show that residential electricity, natural gas (residential and non-residential), wastewater, industrial off-road sources, and light commercial off-road sources increased from 2005 to 2012, while on-road transportation, commercial electricity, solid waste, water, recycled water, and off-road sources (lawn & garden, construction, recreation, and agriculture) decreased from 2005 to 2012. Wastewater and Off-road emissions use indicator data to attribute county-level emissions to the City and the indicator data are also shown in Table 5. Demographic data also help provide perspective to changes in emissions over time. Table 6 shows the number of households, jobs, population, and service population (jobs + population) for each inventory year. Energy emissions in particular often reflect trends in demographic data. For example, the slight increase in population and households between 2005 and 2012 may explain some of the increase in Residential Energy emissions. 8 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Table 5. Activity Data used in 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Community Inventories Sector 2005 2007 2010 2012 % Change 2005 to 2012 On-road Transportation Total Vehicle Miles Traveled 140,684,101 138,727,165 139,197,605 138,350,955 -1.7% Residential Energy Electricity (kWh) 47,843,215 49,976,195 49,906,427 49,778,450 4.0% Natural Gas (therms) 3,339,783 3,305,637 3,448,010 3,364,392 0.7% Commercial Energy Electricity (kWh) 51,741,467 52,130,513 48,545,739 41,191,832 -20.4% Natural Gas (therms) 857,687 900,024 827,116 875,986 2.1% Solid Waste Landfilled (tons) 24,578 18,490 14,230 13,511 -45.0% ADC (tons) 1 246 180 50 48 -80.7% Water and Wastewater Water (MG) 760.2 760.2 687.7 700.3 -7.9% Recycled Water (MG) 30.9 30.9 26.4 27.7 -10.3% Wastewater (City portion of countywide residents) 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.5% Off-road sources2 (% of LA County emissions attributed to the City) Lawn & Garden (% Households) 0.30% 0.29% 0.29% 0.29% -1.7% Construction (% Building permits) 0.32% 0.20% 0.13% 0.24% -25.7% Industrial (% Manufacturing Jobs) 0.03% 0.03% 0.03% 0.03% 4.3% Light Commercial (% Other jobs) 0.17% 0.17% 0.17% 0.18% 5.9% Recreation (Population weighted by income) 0.36% 0.36% 0.35% 0.34% -6.3% Agriculture (% Ag. Jobs) 0.10% 0.11% 0.06% 0.08% -17.6% 1 ADC is Alternative Daily Cover, which is green waste (grass, leaves, and branches) that is used to cover landfill emissions. They are reported separately by CalRecycle and therefore shown separately here. 2 Off-road emissions are available at the county level through CARB’s OFFROAD model. Emissions attributable to the City were derived using indicator data related to the off-road source. For example, the percentage of households in the City compared to the county was used to attribute the same percentage of lawn & garden equipment emissions to the City. See Appendix B for more methodology details. GHG Emissions Inventories 9 Table 6. Demographic Data for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 2005 2007 2010 2012 % Change 2005-2012 Service Population (Population + Jobs) 26,199 26,421 26,173 26,419 0.8% Population 19,340 19,174 19,477 19,574 1.2% Households 9,507 9,457 9,550 9,548 0.4% Jobs 6,859 7,247 6,696 6,845 -0.2% Energy The EECAP ultimately will focus on increasing energy efficiency and reducing GHG gases from energy; therefore, it is important for the City to understand its current energy consumption to make informed decisions for reducing energy-related emissions. Energy use consists of electricity and natural gas. Emissions from Commercial/Industrial and Residential energy use account for about 40% of the total community emissions in 2005 and 2012. Table 7 shows the breakdown in activity (kWh or therms) and GHG emissions by sector and energy source. Table 7. Activity Data and GHG Emissions of Energy in 2005 and 2012 Sector 2005 2012 % Change in Activity 2005-2012 % Change in Emissions 2005-2012 Activity (kWh or therms) Emissions (MT CO2e) Activity (kWh or therms) Emissions (MT CO2e) Commercial/ Industrial Electricity 51,741,467 15,719 41,191,832 13,172 -20.4% -16.2% Natural Gas 857,687 4,561 875,986 4,658 2.1% 2.1% Residential Electricity 47,843,215 14,534 49,778,450 15,918 4.0% 9.5% Natural Gas 3,339,783 17,759 3,364,392 17,890 0.7% 0.7% Total (MT CO2e) 52,573 51,638 -1.8% 10 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Commercial electricity use decreased 20.4% between 2005 and 2012; emissions decreased by more than 16%. Residential electricity use increased by about 4% but emissions increased by more than 9%. These changes are due to the emission factor used for electricity for 2005 and 2012. Emission factors convert activity data into GHG emissions and electricity emission factors vary annually based on how electricity is generated by the electricity provider (i.e., the amount of renewables, natural gas, coal, etc.). In 2005, Southern California Edison (SCE) generated electricity that resulted in an emission factor of 669.7 CO2e. In 2012, SCE’s electricity generation resulted in an emission factor of 705.0 CO2e. Therefore, a kilowatt-hour of electricity used in 2012 emitted more GHGs than a kilowatt-hour of electricity used in 2005. Future emissions could increase or decrease based on changes to SCE’s emission factors, which the City cannot directly affect, or through changes in usage, which can be affected by changes in local policy, outreach, or incentive programs. Unlike electricity, the emission factor for natural gas is estimated on a national basis and remains fairly constant over time. Therefore, the natural gas GHG emissions follow the same trend as usage. In Hermosa Beach, Commercial/Industrial natural gas consumption (therms) decreased by 2.1% from 2005 to 2012; therefore the emissions also declined 2.1%. Residential natural gas therms used and GHG emissions declined nearly 0.7% from 2005 to 2012. Figure 3 shows the trend in electricity and natural gas emissions from 2005 to 2012 for the Commercial/Industrial and Residential sectors. Electricity-Related Emissions All emissions are comprised of activity data and the emission factor, or GHG-intensity, of that activity. For electricity, the activity data are the kilowatt-hours (kWh) used by the city’s residents and businesses and the energy intensity is based on the sources of power that Southern California Edison uses to generate electricity. Changes to either component can affect the GHG emissions from electricity in the City. - 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 Electricity Natural Gas Electricity Natural Gas Commercial ResidentialMT CO2e 2005 2012 Figure 3. GHG Emissions for Community Electricity and Natural Gas, by Sector GHG Emissions Inventories 11 Municipal Emissions As described earlier, a municipal GHG emissions inventory is a subset of the community inventory. The municipal inventory includes emissions from activities conducted as part of government operations in the City. While emissions from government operations are normally a fraction of the overall community emissions, the City has the most direct control over municipal emissions and the City can demonstrate leadership in the community by adopting and implementing energy and GHG reduction strategies. This section presents the findings of the municipal inventory for 2005 (the baseline year), 2007, 2010, and 2012. It also provides more specific detail and findings on the energy sectors, which will form the basis of the reduction measures the City identifies in the EECAP. 2005—2012 Emissions Summary  Municipal emissions have decreased nearly 9% from 2005 to 2012, from 1,501 MT CO2e to 1,372 MT CO2e.  The sector with the greatest reductions was Employee Commute, which decreased 130 MT CO2e between 2005 and 2012.  Emissions from municipal operations account for 1% of community emissions. The City’s Employee Commute is the sector with the largest percentage of emissions in 2005 (23%) and decreased to the third-largest contributor in 2012 (16%) as emissions from this sector decreased 37% over the period (Figure 4). The second largest-emitting sector for 2005 and 2012 was Buildings & Facilities, accounting for 20% of emissions in 2005 and 22% of emissions in 2012 (increasing from 301 MT CO2e to 305 MT CO2e). The Fleet & Equipment sector contributed 227 MT CO2e (15% of total emissions) in 2005 and increased by 44% 2012 (to 328 MT CO2e, or 24% of total emissions), making this sector the largest emissions sector in 2012. Emissions from Solid Waste declined 25% over the period (from 215 to 162 MT CO2e). Emissions from SCE-owned Outdoor Lights increased 4% from 2005 to 2012, while City-owned Outdoor Lights emissions decreased by 19% from 2005 to 2012. The smallest sector, Water Pumping & Irrigation, decreased emissions from 5 MT CO2e in 2005 to less than 1 MT CO2e between 2005 and 2012. The 2005 and 2012 emissions and changes are detailed in Table 8. 12 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Table 8. Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector for 2005 and 2012 Sector 2005 (MT CO2e) 2012 (MT CO2e) % Change 2005 to 2012 Employee Commute 348 218 -37% Buildings & Facilities 301 305 1% Outdoor Lights—City-Owned 264 213 -19% Fleet & Equipment 227 328 44% Solid Waste 215 162 -25% Outdoor Lights—SCE-Owned 141 146 4% Water Pumping & Irrigation 5.0 0.6 -87% Total 1,501 1,372 -8.6% Note: City-Owned Outdoor Lights includes streetlights, traffic signals, and area lighting. SCE-Owned Outdoor Lights includes streetlights and outdoor lighting. 20% 15% 23% 14% 10% 18% <1% 2005 22% 24% 16% 12% 11% 15% <1% Buildings & Facilities Fleet & Equipment Employee Commute Solid Waste Outdoor Lights—SCE-Owned Outdoor Lights—City-Owned Water Pumping & Irrigation 2012 Figure 4. Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector for 2005 and 2012 GHG Emissions Inventories 13 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Inventories Figure 5 and Table 9 show the municipal GHG emissions by sector for all four inventory years. Emissions peaked in 2007 (1,541 MT CO2e) and were the lowest in 2010 (1,340 MT CO2e). Figure 5. Municipal GHG Emissions for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Table 9. Municipal GHG Emissions for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Sector 2005 (MT CO2e) % of Total 2007 (MT CO2e) % of Total 2010 (MT CO2e) % of Total 2012 (MT CO2e) % of Total Employee Commute 348 23% 333 22% 274 20% 218 16% Buildings & Facilities 301 20% 333 22% 276 21% 305 22% Outdoor Lights—City- Owned 264 18% 258 17% 185 14% 213 16% Fleet & Equipment 227 15% 270 18% 320 24% 328 24% Solid Waste 215 14% 213 14% 162 12% 162 12% Outdoor lights—SCE- Owned 141 9% 134 9% 122 9% 146 11% Water Pumping & Irrigation 5.0 0% 0.49 0% 0.55 0% 0.64 0% Total 1,501 1,541 1,340 1,372 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 2005 2007 2010 2012MT CO2e Water Pumping & Irrigation Outdoor Lights—SCE-Owned Solid Waste Fleet & Equipment Outdoor Lights—City-Owned Buildings & Facilities Employee Commute 14 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Table 10 summarizes activity data for each sector and subsector. City-Owned Fleet showed significant increases in compressed natural gas (CNG) and diesel fuel used, which reflects the increase in Fleet & Equipment emissions. The significant decrease in Employee Commute reflects the change in City employees from 2005 to 2012, which decreased 34%. Table 10. Activity Data used in 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Municipal Inventories Sector 2005 2007 2010 2012 % Change 2005 to 2012 Buildings & Facilities Electricity (kWh) 895,746 932,207 883,858 915,327 2% Natural Gas (therms)1 5,383 11,977 4,621 2,542 -53% Outdoor Lights City-Owned Electricity (kWh) 868,589 895,841 643,360 664,636 -23% SCE-Owned Electricity (kWh) 464,752 466,608 424,794 455,210 -2% Fleet & Equipment City-Owned Fleet Gasoline (gallons) 12,665 17,406 20,481 20,341 61% Diesel (gallons) 2,584 2,584 4,121 5,502 113% LPG (gallons) - - 36 23 NA CNG (standard cubic feet) 13,377 13,377 81,114 98,658 638% Contracted2 Gasoline (gallons) 3,640 3,640 3,640 3,640 0% Diesel (gallons) 2,057 2,057 2,057 2,057 0% LPG (gallons) 5,127 5,127 5,127 5,127 0% Employee Commute Gasoline (gallons) 794,170 760,056 634,526 506,797 -36% Diesel (gallons) 26,784 35,852 25,110 20,055 -25% # Full Time Employee Equivalents 186 184 154 123 -34% Solid Waste2 Generated Waste (tons) 666 660 660 660 -1% Water Pumping & Irrigation Electricity (kWh) 17,033 1,712 1,907 1,999 -88% 1 Contracted fuel use was not available for 2010 and 2012. Data from 2007 were used. 2 Solid Waste data for 2010 and 2012 assumed 2007 values. GHG Emissions Inventories 15 Energy As with the community emissions, the EECAP will focus on increasing energy efficiency and reducing GHG gases from energy within municipal operations. The City has more direct control over energy- related emissions than other sectors, such as employee commute. Municipal energy use includes Buildings & Facilities, SCE-owned Outdoor Lighting, City-owned Outdoor Lighting, and Water Pumping & Irrigation. Energy accounted for 47% of total emissions in 2005 and 48% in 2012. While both electricity and natural gas are used for Building & Facilities, Outdoor Lighting and Water Pumping & Irrigation only use electricity. Emissions from energy declined 7% from 2005 to 2012; electricity-based emissions declined almost 5% and natural gas related emissions decreased 52% (Table 11). As with community energy, municipal emissions use variable electricity emission factors and constant natural gas emission factors. Table 11. Activity Data and GHG Emissions of Energy in 2005 and 2012 Sector 2005 2012 % Change in Activity 2005-2012 % Change in Emissions 2005-2012 Activity (kWh or Therms) Emissions (MT CO2e) Activity (kWh) Emissions (MT CO2e) B&F (kWh) 895,746 272 915,327 291 2% 7% Outdoor Lighting— City (kWh) 868,589 264 664,636 213 -23% -19% Outdoor Lighting— SCE (kWh) 464,752 141 455,210 146 -2% 4% Water Pumping & Irrigation (kWh) 17,033 5 1,999 0.64 -88% -87% B&F (therms) 5,383 29 2,542 14 -53% -52% Total 2,251,503 711 2,039,714 665 -9% -7% Note: B&F is Buildings and Facilities. 16 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Figure 6 shows the trend in electricity and natural gas emissions from 2005 to 2012 for the municipal energy sectors. Note: B&F is Buildings and Facilities. Figure 6. GHG Emissions for Municipal Electricity and Natural Gas, by Sector - 50 100 150 200 250 300 B&F (Electricity)Outdoor Lighting— City Outdoor Lighting— SCE B&F (Nat Gas)Water Pumping & IrrigationMT CO2e 2005 2012 Inventory Forecasts 17 Inventory Forecasts GHG emissions are forecast using two scenarios: a Business-as-Usual (BAU) and an Adjusted BAU scenario. The BAU scenario describes emissions based on projected growth in population and employment and does not consider policies that will reduce emissions in the future (that is, the policies in place in 2012 are assumed to remain constant through 2035). The Adjusted BAU scenario describes emissions based on projected growth and considers policies that will achieve GHG reductions in the future. Policies, described in detail below, include State-adopted or approved legislation that will affect future emissions. By evaluating the two scenarios, the City can see the effect that existing policies may have on future emissions and be better able to determine how local measures can provide additional reductions. Two future years are forecasted for each scenario: 2020 and 2035. The 2020 forecast year is consistent with the goals identified in Assembly Bill (AB) 32, which identifies a statewide GHG reduction target by 2020. The 2035 forecast year will allow the City to develop long-term strategies to continue GHG reductions beyond 2020. Business-as-Usual Forecasts The BAU forecasts estimate future emissions using current (2012) consumption patterns and emission factors with the anticipated growth in the City. Anticipated growth is estimated using data from regional planning scenarios developed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the City, and other relevant sources (Table 12). The most relevant growth factors are used to project emissions by sector. For example, future Residential Energy emissions were developed using current energy use per household (from the 2012 inventory) and the anticipated number of households in the future. Actual energy use is a function of several variables, not only the number of households; however, this approach is supported by current protocols and best practices within the State and provides a consistent approach to forecasting. Compound annual growth rates were developed using the growth projections from 2012 to 2020 and from 2021 to 2035, as shown Table 12. In general, the City is expecting modest growth to 2020 and 2035 as population and jobs are expected to increase. SCAG is projecting fewer vehicle miles traveled from 2012 to 2020 despite population and job growth, but that trend is reversed after 2020, when vehicle miles traveled will again increase. Due to the relatively low growth, the City does not anticipate major staffing changes in its government services. 18 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Table 12. Growth Factors for 2012, 2020, and 2035 Sector Demographic Indicator 2012 2020 2035 2012-2020 CAGR1 2020-2035 CAGR1 Transportation Vehicle Miles Traveled 138,350,955 126,238,272 129,742,671 -1.14% 0.18% Solid Waste, Water, Wastewater, Off- Road Sources Service Population (Population + Jobs) 26,419 26,900 27,400 0.23% 0.12% NA2 Population 19,574 19,600 19,700 0.02% 0.03% Residential Energy Households 9,548 9,600 9,600 0.07% 0.00% Commercial/ Industrial Energy Jobs 6,845 7,300 7,700 0.81% 0.36% Municipal Jobs Municipal Emissions3 106 F/T 34 P/T 137 F/T 60 P/T 146 F/T 65 P/T 3.9% 0.45% Source: SCAG 2012. F/T: Full-time employees; P/T: Part-time employees 1 Compound annual growth rate. 2 Not Applicable. Population data are shown for informational purposes but are not used for forecasting any sector. 3 The number of jobs in the City is used as an indicator for all municipal operation emissions. Community Business-as-Usual Forecast  BAU community emissions are expected to decrease 8.1% from baseline levels by 2020 and 5.8% by 2035. The City’s BAU emissions in 2020 are estimated to be 125,982 MT CO2e, or an 8.1% decrease from baseline (2005) emissions. By 2035, emissions are estimated to decrease 5.8% from the baseline level to 129,157 MT CO2e (Table 13). Table 13. Community BAU Forecast Sector 2005 (MT CO2e) 2012 (MT CO2e) 2020 (MT CO2e) % Change 2012-2020 2035 (MT CO2e) %Change 2012-2035 On-Road Transportation 73,567 68,235 66,150 -3% 67,986 0% Residential Energy 32,293 33,808 33,969 0% 33,969 0% Commercial Energy 20,280 17,830 18,930 6% 19,967 12% Solid Waste 6,015 3,334 3,391 2% 3,454 4% Water 4,065 2,600 2,645 2% 2,694 4% Off-Road Sources 888 745 837 12% 1,026 38% Wastewater 52 59 60 2% 61 3% Total 137,160 126,611 125,982 0% 129,157 2% % Change from 2005 -7.7% -8.1% -5.8% Inventory Forecasts 19 Municipal Business-as-Usual Forecast  BAU municipal emissions are expected to be 20% higher than baseline levels in 2020 and 28% higher than baseline levels in 2035. The City is anticipating significant growth in city employees by 2020 or 2035 from current (2012) levels— 36% more full-time equivalent employees in 2020 compared with 2012, and 45% more employees in 2035 compared with 2012. Therefore, the activity data for municipal services is also expected to increase relative to 2012. Table 14. Municipal BAU Forecast 2005 (MT CO2e) 2012 (MT CO2e) 2020 (MT CO2e) % Change 2012-2020 2035 (MT CO2e) % Change 2012-2035 Buildings & Facilities 301 305 400 31% 428 40% Employee Commute 348 218 286 31% 306 40% Solid Waste 215 162 213 31% 227 40% Outdoor Lighting 405 359 471 31% 504 40% Vehicle Fleet 227 328 430 31% 460 40% Water Pumping & Irrigation 5.0 0.64 1 56% 1 56% Total 1,501 1372 1801 31% 1926 40% % Change from 2005 -9% 20% 28% Adjusted Business-as-Usual Forecasts State legislation has been approved and/or adopted that will reduce GHG emissions in the City. These policies do not require additional local action, but should be accounted for in the City’s emissions forecasts to provide a more accurate picture of future emissions and the level of local action needed to reduce emissions to levels consistent with State recommendations. This forecast is called the Adjusted BAU forecast. The measures are described briefly below. Low Carbon Fuel Standard. The Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) was developed as a result of Executive Order S-1-07, which mandates that the carbon intensity of transportation fuels in California are lowered 10% by 2020. The State is currently implementing this standard, which is being phased in and will achieve full implementation in 2020. Assembly Bill (AB) 1493 and Advanced Clean Cars. AB 1493 directed CARB to adopt GHG standards for motor vehicles through model year 2015 that would result in reductions in GHG emissions by up to 25% in 2030. In addition, the State’s Advanced Clean Cars program includes additional components that will further reduce GHG emissions statewide, including more stringent fuel efficiency standards for model years 2017—2025 and support infrastructure for the commercialization of zero-emission vehicles. CARB 20 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach anticipates additional GHG reductions of 3% by 2020, 27% by 2035, and 33% by 20503. These are also known as “Pavley I” and “Pavley II” regulations. California Building Code Title 24. California’s building efficiency standards are updated regularly to incorporate new energy efficiency technologies. The code was most recently updated in 2013 and went into effect for new development in 2014. For projects implemented after January 1, 2014, the California Energy Commission estimates that the 2013 Title 24 energy efficiency standards will reduce consumption by an estimated 25% for residential buildings and 30% for commercial buildings, relative to the 2008 standards. These percentage savings relate to heating, cooling, lighting, and water heating only; therefore, these percentage savings were applied to the estimated percentage of energy use by Title 24. Renewable Portfolio Standard. The Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) requires energy providers to derive 33% of their electricity from qualified renewable sources. This is anticipated to lower emission factors (i.e., fewer GHG emissions per kilowatt-hour used) statewide. Therefore, reductions from RPS are taken for energy embedded in water, which uses energy sources throughout the state to move from the water source area to the City. However, no credit was taken for this measure for the SCE service region (i.e., for residential and commercial electricity used in the City supplied by SCE). Analysis of SCE’s current portfolio and the sources needed to replace the nuclear generation that has been taken out of service has revealed great uncertainty in how SCE’s emission factors may change over time. Therefore, the emission factor used in the 2012 inventory and the BAU forecast was also used in the Adjusted BAU forecast. Senate Bill X7-7. California’s SB X7-7 requires water suppliers to reduce urban per capita water consumption 20% from a baseline level by 2020. The City is supplied by California Water Service and the reductions in GHG emissions from SB X7-7 were calculated by applying the reduction goals established by California Water Service to the City’s population in 2020 and 2035. Community Adjusted Business-as-Usual Forecast  Emissions are expected to decrease under the Adjusted BAU forecast and will be 19% lower in 2020 than 2005 and 31% lower than 2005 levels by 2035. The City’s Adjusted BAU emissions in 2020 are estimated to be 111,690 MT CO2e in 2020 and 94,162 MT CO2e in 2035 (Table 15). This change represents an 18.6% reduction from 2005 by 2020 and 31% reduction by 2035. Due to the stringent State vehicle standards, the emissions from the Transportation sector are expected to decrease significantly over time, while the proportion of emissions from Residential and Non-residential Energy will increase. Emissions from Solid Waste are expected to increase while emissions from Water and Wastewater will remain steady over time, but all account for less than 10% of total emissions. 3 CARB Advanced Clean Cars Summary Sheet Inventory Forecasts 21 Table 15. Community Adjusted BAU Emissions Sector 2005 (MT CO2e) 2012 (MT CO2e) 2020 (MT CO2e) 2020 % of Total 2035 (MT CO2e) 2035 % of Total Transportation & Mobile Sources 74,455 68,980 53,857 49% 35,533 38% Non-Residential Energy 20,280 17,830 18,742 17% 19,564 21% Residential Energy 32,293 33,808 33,953 30% 33,953 36% Solid Waste 6,015 3,334 3,391 3% 3,454 4% Water & Wastewater 4,117 2,659 1,747 2% 1,658 2% Total 137,160 126,611 111,690 100% 94,162 100% % Change from 2005 -8% -19% -31% Municipal Adjusted Business-as-Usual Forecast  Emissions are expected to increase under the Adjusted BAU forecast and are estimated to be 17% higher in 2020 and 25% higher in 2035 relative to 2005 levels.  The City will need to reduce emissions by 475 MT CO2e in 2020 from the forecasted level to meet a state-aligned target of 15% below 2005 levels. The City’s Municipal Adjusted BAU emissions in 2020 are estimated to be 1,751 MT CO2e, which is 17% above the 2005 baseline level (Table 16). By 2035, the level of reductions is anticipated to be 25% above 2005 levels, or 1,872 MT CO2e. The Adjusted BAU emissions are slightly lower than the BAU emissions due to the Low Carbon Fuel Standard measure described earlier. The Low Carbon Fuel Standard would lower the carbon intensity of fuels used in both the City’s Vehicle Fleet and Employee Commute sectors. Table 16. Municipal Adjusted BAU Emissions Sector 2005 (MT CO2e) 2012 (MT CO2e) 2020 (MT CO2e) 2020 % of Total 2035 (MT CO2e) 2035 % of Total Buildings & Facilities 301 305 400 23% 428 23% Employee Commute 348 218 266 15% 284 15% Solid Waste 215 162 213 12% 227 12% Outdoor Lighting 405 359 471 27% 504 27% Vehicle Fleet 227 328 400 23% 428 23% Water Pumping & Irrigation 5 0.64 0.64 <1% 0.64 <1% Total 1,501 1,373 1,751 100% 1,872 100% % Change from 2005 -9% 17% 25% 22 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Reduction Targets The State has set goals for reducing GHG emissions by 2020 and 2050 through AB 32 and Executive Order (EO) S-3-05, respectively. The State has also provided guidance to local jurisdictions as “essential partners” in achieving the State’s goals by identifying a 2020 recommended reduction goal. That goal, stated in the AB 32 Scoping Plan, was for local governments to achieve a 15% reduction below 2005 levels by 2020, which aligns with the State’s goal of not exceeding 1990 emissions levels by 20204. The State’s long term target is to emit no more than 20% of 1990 levels by 2050 (or, a reduction of 80% below 1990 levels by 2050). The State has not provided an interim target, nor has it provided guidance to local governments beyond the 2020 emissions target recommendations. It is however clear that the issue of climate change will not end in 2020 and continued reductions should be achieved to keep the State on a path toward the 2050 goal. A straight-line projection from the 2020 to 2050 goals would result in a reduction goal of 49% below 2005 levels by 2035 midpoint. Ultimately, the City will determine the level of reductions that it can and should achieve. The recommended targets provided below are guidance based on consistency with the State’s goals. Recommended Community Targets In 2020, the City will meet the reduction target through existing efforts. In 2035, the City would need to reduce 24,210 MT CO2e emissions below the Adjusted BAU scenario to meet the State-aligned target (Table 17 and Figure 7). Table 17. State-Aligned GHG Reduction Targets Sector 2005 2012 2020 2035 BAU Emissions (MT CO2e) 137,160 126,611 125,982 129,157 Adjusted BAU Emissions (MT CO2e) 137,160 126,611 111,690 94,162 State-Aligned Target(% change from 2005) -15% -49% State-Aligned Target (% change from 2012) -8% -45% State-Aligned Emissions Goal (MT CO2e) 116,586 69,952 Reductions from Adjusted BAU needed to meet the Target (MT CO2e) Target Met 24,210 4 In an analysis, the State concluded that a 15% reduction in emissions from 2005 levels by 2020 would be equivalent to achieving 1990 emissions levels. Reduction Targets 23 Municipal Targets In 2010, the Hermosa Beach City Council declared its goal to become carbon neutral. The City is hoping to achieve this goal by 2020. Without this goal, the City’s emissions are anticipated to be 1,751 MT CO2e in 2020 and 1,872 MT CO2e in 2035. Therefore, the City must reduce emissions by 1,751 from the Adjusted BAU forecast to meet the 2020 goal and maintain this level in the future (Table 18 and Figure 8). Table 18. State-Aligned Municipal GHG Reduction Targets 2005 2012 2020 2035 BAU Emissions (MT CO2e) 1,501 1,372 1,801 1,926 Adjusted BAU Emissions (MT CO2e) 1,501 1,372 1,751 1,872 Carbon Neutrality Target (% Reduction from 2005) -100% -100% Carbon Neutrality Emissions (MT CO2e) 0 0 Reductions from Adjusted BAU needed to meet the Target (MT CO2e) 1,751 1,872 - 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035MT CO2e Water & Wastewater Solid Waste Commercial Energy Residential Energy Transportation & Mobile Sources 15% below 2005 49% below 2005 Path to 2035 from 2020 ABAU (-3.1%/yr) Figure 7. Community Emissions Inventories, Projections, and Targets 24 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Figure 8. Municipal Emissions Inventories, Projections, and Targets 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035MT CO2e Water Pumping & Irrigation Solid Waste Buildings & Facilities Outdoor Lighting Employee Commute Vehicle Fleet Path to 2020 from 2012 Conclusions and Next Steps 25 Conclusions and Next Steps This Report presents the City’s community and municipal inventories, forecasts, and recommended reduction targets. It is the foundation of the EECAP and provides the City a first look at what will be needed to meet emissions reductions that are aligned with the State and to mitigate the City’s impacts on climate change. This Report also helps to guide the City in determining feasible energy efficiency reduction opportunities by detailing energy-related emissions, including electricity and natural gas from Residential and Non-residential sectors. The next steps in the EECAP process are to review the information provided in this Report and to determine preliminary GHG reduction targets for the community and municipal operations. The South Bay Cities Council of Governments will also begin to work with the City to identify local and subregional energy efficiency measures that could be implemented to reach the City’s emissions targets. 26 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach References Association of Environmental Professionals. 2013. The California Supplement to the United States Community-Wide Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Protocol. California Air Resources Board. 2010. Local Government Operations Protocol For the quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions inventories version 1.1. California Air Resources Board. 2011. California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory: 2000-2009. ICLEI 2012. U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions version 1.0. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (IPCC) 1996. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Appendix A: Glossary of Terms Adjusted Business-as-Usual: A GHG forecast scenario that accounts for known policies and regulations that will affect future emissions. Generally, these are state and federal initiatives that will reduce emissions from the business-as-usual scenario. Baseline Year: The inventory year used for setting targets and comparing future inventories against. Business-as-Usual (BAU): A GHG forecast scenario used for the estimation of greenhouse gas emissions at a future date based on current technologies and regulatory requirements and in the absence of other reduction strategies. Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2e): This is a common unit for normalizing greenhouse gases with different levels of heat trapping potential. For carbon dioxide itself, emissions in tons of CO2 and tons of CO2e are the same, whereas one ton of nitrous oxide emissions equates to 298 tons of CO2e and one ton of methane equates to 25 tons of CO2e. The values are based on the gases’ global warming potentials. Community Inventory: GHG emissions that result from the activities by residents and businesses in the city. An inventory reports emissions that occur over a single calendar year. Emissions Factor: A coefficient used to convert activity data into greenhouse gas emissions. The factor is a measure of the greenhouse gas intensity of an activity, such as the amount of CO2 in one kilowatt-hour of electricity. Global Warming Potential (GWP): The relative effectiveness of a molecule of a greenhouse gas at trapping heat compared with one molecule of CO2. Metric Ton (MT): Common international measurement for the quantity of greenhouse gas emissions. A metric ton is equal to 2205 lbs. or 1.1 short tons. Municipal Inventory: GHG emissions that result from the activities performed as part of the government operations in the city and are a subset of the community inventory. An inventory reports emissions that occur over a single calendar year. Reduction targets: GHG emissions levels not to be exceeded by a specific date. Reduction targets are often informed by state recommendations and different targets may be established for different years. Sector: A subset of the emissions inventory classified by a logical grouping such as economic or municipal-specific category. Appendix B: Methodology This appendix provides a detailed description of the data sources, emission factors, policies, and assumptions used to develop the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventories, forecasts under a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario, forecasts under an Adjusted BAU scenario, and the recommended GHG reduction targets. Protocols The GHG inventories for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 were calculated using tools and guidance documents developed or supported by government agencies. Calculation protocols have been developed to ensure consistency among community and municipal inventories. Specifically, the U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Community Protocol) (ICLEI 2012) and the California Supplement (AEP 2013) were used for the community inventories and the Local Government Operations Protocol (LGOP) was used for the municipal inventories (CARB 2010). These protocols often have multiple calculation methods for a single emission source depending on the data available. There are two broad approaches for calculating emissions: “bottom-up” and “top-down”. A bottom-up approach relies on end-use data, such as the city-level electricity usage. A top-down approach relies on aggregated data that is allocated to the city based on population, employment, or other relevant indicator. Bottom-up calculations were performed whenever possible to provide the most detailed and likely accurate picture of emissions within a jurisdiction; however, when detailed data were not available, other appropriate methods were used and are described in this appendix. Data were also calculated and managed to best fit the GHG inventory and planning software tool used for this project, called ClearPath. ClearPath was developed by the Statewide Energy Efficiency Collaborative (SEEC) which is a partnership between several statewide agencies, utilities, and non-profits to assist cities and counties in climate mitigation planning. ClearPath is further described at californiaseec.org. In addition, a South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) User’s Guide is being developed as part of this project to help cities and SBCCOG to maintain the data and provide for consistent reporting of emissions over time. Global Warming Potential Factors The inventories include the three GHGs most relevant to community and municipal emissions: CO2, CH4, and N2O. Each GHG differs in its ability to absorb heat in the atmosphere based on their molecular properties and expected lifetime in the atmosphere, and it is useful to describe emissions in one unit of measurement. That unit of measurement is a CO2-equivalent, or CO2e and Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors are used to standardize emissions from various GHGs. GWP factors, developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), represent the heat-trapping ability of each GHG relative to that of CO2. For example, the GWP factor of CH4 is 25 because one metric ton (MT) of CH4 has 25 times the heat-trapping capacity as one MT CO2 (over a 100-year period). IPCC periodically updates the GWP factors of GHGs based on new science and updated background mixing ratios of CO2. CO2 always has a GWP factor of 1 and the other GHGs are calculated relative to CO2. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) recently updated their GWP factors to align with the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report, as shown in Table B-1. GWP factors are unitless. Emissions in the inventories are reported in units of CO2e. B-2 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Table B-1. Global Warming Potentials CO2 CH4 N2O GWP 1 25 298 Source: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, 2007. Activity Data Activity data is the end-use consumption amount of a sector, such as kilowatt hours of electricity, therms of natural gas, and vehicle miles traveled for on-road transportation. In estimating the City’s historic GHG emissions, activity data at the City level were obtained when possible (a “bottom-up” approach). When not available, other data sources were used, generally at the county level (a “top- down” approach). Municipal data for 2005 and 2007 were obtained from the City’s previous inventory report. Other data were provided by the sources as identified Table B-12. TableB-12. Activity Data Sources Data Data Source Notes Community Electricity Southern California Edison Municipal Electricity Southern California Edison Maintained by SBCCOG Community Natural Gas Southern California Gas Company Municipal Natural Gas Southern California Gas Company Community Water California Water Service Vehicle Miles Traveled Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Origin-destination approach, described below Demographic Data SCAG Vehicle Fleet City Employee Commute City Off-Road Emissions OFFROAD Model County-level data Waste CalRecycle Origin-Destination VMT For the community inventory, activity data (vehicle miles traveled) were based on an origin-destination approach used by the State in developing emissions target for metropolitan planning organizations under SB 375. This approach has also been the typical approach used in estimating emission within a city. This approach accounts for:  Half of the emissions where one endpoint is in the City, for example either the origin or destination of the trip.  All of the emissions where the trip begins and ends within the City.  None of the emissions that are “pass-through”; that is, a trip passes through the City but does not begin or end within its boundary. This approach is used to account for trips or portions of trips that the city may have some control over. B-3 Appendix B: Methodology Community Activity Data Community activity data are shown in Table B-13, except for off-road emissions, which are shown in Table B-14 for Los Angeles County. Table B-13. Activity Data used in 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Community Inventories Sector 2005 2007 2010 2012 % Change 2005 to 2012 On-road Transportation Total Vehicle Miles Traveled 140,684,101 138,727,165 139,197,605 138,350,955 -1.7% Residential Energy Electricity (kWh) 47,843,215 49,976,195 49,906,427 49,778,450 4.0% Natural Gas (therms) 3,339,783 3,305,637 3,448,010 3,364,392 0.7% Commercial Energy Electricity (kWh) 51,741,467 52,130,513 48,545,739 41,191,832 -20.4% Natural Gas (therms) 857,687 900,024 827,116 875,986 2.1% Solid Waste Landfilled (tons) 24,578 18,490 14,230 13,511 -45.0% ADC (tons) 1 246 180 50 48 -80.7% Water and Wastewater Water (MG) 760.2 760.2 687.7 700.3 -7.9% Recycled Water (MG) 30.9 30.9 26.4 27.7 -10.3% Wastewater (City portion of countywide residents) 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.5% Off-road sources2 (% of LA County emissions attributed to the City) Lawn & Garden (% Households) 0.30% 0.29% 0.29% 0.29% -1.7% Construction (% Building permits) 0.32% 0.20% 0.13% 0.24% -25.7% Industrial (% Manufacturing jobs) 0.03% 0.03% 0.03% 0.03% 4.3% Light Commercial (% Other jobs) 0.17% 0.17% 0.17% 0.18% 5.9% Recreation (Population weighted by income) 0.36% 0.36% 0.35% 0.34% -6.3% Agriculture (% Ag. Jobs) 0.10% 0.11% 0.06% 0.08% -17.6% B-4 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Table B-14. Emissions from Off-road Categories for Los Angeles County Off-road Class GHG Type 2005 (MT CO2e /yr) 2007 (MT CO2e /yr) 2010 (MT CO2e /yr) 2012 (MT CO2e /yr) Agricultural Equipment CO2 921.79 910.27 893.24 882.09 CH4 0.19 0.17 0.14 0.12 N2O 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Construction and Mining Equipment CO2 268,646.23 277,541.76 290,911.26 299,875.79 CH4 34.12 31.44 28.24 26.28 N2O 0.22 0.24 0.25 0.26 Industrial Equipment CO2 8,099.90 8,562.29 9,255.58 9,870.65 CH4 7.16 6.2 4.46 3.89 N2O 0.69 0.63 0.56 0.55 Lawn and Garden Equipment CO2 2,581.13 2,737.30 2,968.71 3,215.02 CH4 4.98 4.87 4.76 4.96 N2O 2.01 2.01 2.01 2.13 Light Commercial Equipment CO2 5,300.36 5,572.36 5,979.92 6,387.77 CH4 2.83 2.54 2.18 2.05 N2O 0.91 0.97 1.02 1.07 Recreational Equipment CO2 286.54 309.8 343.68 369.04 CH4 2.14 2.32 2.58 2.77 N2O 0.52 0.57 0.64 0.68 Municipal Activity Data Municipal activity data are shown in Table B-15. Employee Commute Data for Employee Commute in ClearPath are entered as gasoline or diesel. Annual vehicle miles traveled is entered as is the percent of miles traveled by passenger cars, light trucks, and heavy trucks. The City conducted a ridership survey in 2013 through SurveyMonkey.com and presented the results in a 2014 report titled “The City of Hermosa Beach Employee Commute Survey: 2013 & Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Strategies”. 108 employees completed the survey, representing 76% of employees. The results were summarized and extrapolated to the total number of City employees in 2010 and 2012. Employee commute vehicle miles traveled by fuel type for 2005 and 2007 were taken from the City’s previous GHG inventories. The number of employees for 2010 was assumed to be the same as in 2012. B-5 Appendix B: Methodology Table B-15. Activity Data used in 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Municipal Inventories Sector 2005 2007 2010 2012 % Change 2005 to 2012 Buildings & Facilities Electricity (kWh) 895,746 932,207 883,858 915,327 2% Natural Gas (therms)1 5,383 11,977 4,621 2,542 -53% Outdoor Lights City-Owned Electricity (kWh) 868,589 895,841 643,360 664,636 -23% SCE-Owned Electricity (kWh) 464,752 466,608 424,794 455,210 -2% Fleet & Equipment City-Owned Fleet Gasoline (gallons) 12,665 17,406 20,481 20,341 61% Diesel (gallons) 2,584 2,584 4,121 5,502 113% LPG (gallons) - - 36 23 NA CNG (standard cubic feet) 13,377 13,377 81,114 98,658 638% Contracted2 Gasoline (gallons) 3,640 3,640 3,640 3,640 0% Diesel (gallons) 2,057 2,057 2,057 2,057 0% LPG (gallons) 5,127 5,127 5,127 5,127 0% Employee Commute Gasoline (gallons) 794,170 760,056 634,526 506,797 -36% Diesel (gallons) 26,784 35,852 25,110 20,055 -25% # Full Time Employee Equivalents 186 184 154 123 -34% Solid Waste2 Generated Waste (tons) 666 660 660 660 -1% Water Pumping & Irrigation Electricity (kWh) 17,033 1,712 1,907 1,999 -88% 1 Contracted fuel use was not available for 2010 and 2012. Data from 2007 were used. 2 Solid Waste data for 2010 and 2012 assumed 2007 values. Emission Factors Emissions factors are used to convert activity data to GHG emissions. An emission factor is defined as the average emission rate of a given GHG for a given source, relative to units of activity. By definition, an emission factor is related to activity data. The emission factors used in the inventories are described by sector below. B-6 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Electricity California utilities report the average CO2 content per output of electricity on an intermittent basis. The CO2-intensity of electricity varies by utility and year, due to changes in supply, renewable generation, and other factors. The community and municipal operations use electricity provided by SCE except for embedded energy in water, which travels throughout the state and therefore utilizes electricity from multiple utilities (and are shown under the Water Sector). Southern California Edison SCE reported CO2 factors for 2005 and 2007 through the Climate Registry, and a CO2e factor for 2012 in their 2012 Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability Report. When an emission factor is unknown for a certain year, it is standard to use the most recently-reported historic factor until (and if) there is an updated factor. There is no published SCE emission factor for 2010; therefore the factor for 2007 was used for SCE electricity-related emissions calculations in 2010 (Table B-2). Table B-2. Southern California Edison Electricity Emission Factors Year CO2 CH4 N2O Proxy Year Data Source 2005 665.72 0.03 0.011 NA CO2: Climate Registry. CH4 and N2O: U.S. Community Protocol 2007 630.89 0.029 0.010 NA CO2: Climate Registry. CH4 and N2O: U.S. Community Protocol 2010 630.89 0.029 0.010 2007 CO2: Climate Registry. CH4 and N2O: U.S. Community Protocol 2012 7051 NA NA NA 2012 Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability Report NA: Not Applicable. 1 The 2012 factor was reported as CO2e; therefore, there are no CH4 and N2O factors. Natural Gas Combustion Emission factors for natural gas do not vary greatly over time or by supplier. Therefore, emission factors are U.S. averages as listed in the Community Protocol and are applied for all years (TableB-4). Table B-4. Natural Gas Emission Factors CO2 CH4 N2O Data Source kg /MMBtu 53.02 0.005 0.0001 U.S. Community Protocol Transportation and Mobile Sources EMFAC Model CO2 emission factors for transportation and mobile sources are calculated using the State-developed Emissions Factor (EMFAC) model, which can be downloaded at http://www.arb.ca.gov/emfac/. Emissions are available at the county level and emission factors were developed and applied to vehicle miles traveled specific to each inventory year. Data are aggregated as annual emissions for all vehicle B-7 Appendix B: Methodology model years and speeds, but separated by vehicle category. Vehicle categories include light-duty autos, light-duty trucks, medium-duty vehicles, heavy-duty trucks, and motorcycles.1 These categorizations are used to develop an emissions factor for gasoline and diesel vehicles. Emission factors were developed using total CO2 exhaust, which includes emissions from vehicles in motion, idling, and ignition. While emissions from idling and ignitions are not directly related to mileage, they were included so that reductions from measures that may decrease idling could be accounted for in future inventories. On-Road Transportation Emissions were converted to emission factors as grams of CO2 per mile for gasoline and diesel vehicle using EMFAC and a 3-step process (for each inventory year): 1. Calculate the vehicle-class average fuel efficiency (miles/gallon) using EMFAC vehicle miles traveled and gallons of fuel consumed for Los Angeles County; 2. Calculate the vehicle-class average CO2 emission factor using EMFAC CO2 emissions2 and gallons of fuel consumed for Los Angeles County; 3. Calculate the average grams CO2/mile traveled factor weighted by vehicle class miles traveled for Los Angeles County. EMFAC does not provide emissions for CH4 and N2O; therefore, factors from the Community Protocol were used (Table B-5). Table B-5. Fleet-Average Emission Factors Gasoline On Road Average Factor (grams/mile) Diesel On Road Average Factor (grams/mile) CO2 CH4 N2O CO2 CH4 N2O 2005 466.062 0.030 0.034 1329.797 0.001 0.001 2007 464.019 0.028 0.029 1331.634 0.001 0.001 2010 458.638 0.028 0.029 1280.045 0.001 0.001 2012 442.657 0.028 0.029 1302.653 0.001 0.001 Employee Commute Emissions from employee commute in the municipal operations are calculated using annual vehicle miles traveled for gasoline and diesel. CO2 emissions are estimated using a default emission factor of 8.78 and 10.21 kg/gallon for gasoline and diesel, respectively3 and fuel economy, which is based on EMFAC outputs for each inventory year and vehicle class. Vehicle miles traveled are converted to CH4 1 Vehicle categories may use either EMFAC2007 or EMFAC2011 categorizations and result in the same data for the purposes of these inventories; EMFAC2007 categories were used here EMFAC2011 further disaggregates medium heavy-duty vehicles and heavy heavy-duty vehicles into 29 vehicle categories. This level of detail is not needed for these inventories. More information on vehicle categories is available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/vehicle- categories.xlsx. 2 For 2010 and 2012, the emissions accounting for the effects of existing policies (Pavley and Low Carbon Fuel Standard) were used. These standards did not exist in 2005 and 2007. 3 Information from ClearPath developers e-mail dated June 19, 2014. B-8 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach and N2O emissions using emission factors from the Community Protocol. Table B-6 shows the miles per gallon and grams (CH4 and N2O) per mile used to estimate emissions from employee commute by vehicle class. Vehicle Fleet Vehicle fleet consists of City-owned and contracted vehicles used to perform City services. Vehicle Fleet requires input of gallons of fuel used by fuel type to estimate CO2 emissions. Vehicle miles traveled are used to estimate CH4 and N2O. The factors used for the City are shown in Table B-6. Table B-6. Employee Commute and Vehicle Fleet Emission Factors 2005 2007 2010 2012 Gasoline Passenger Vehicle MPG 21.700 21.875 22.027 22.064 g CH4/mi 0.030 0.028 0.028 0.028 g N2O/mi 0.034 0.029 0.029 0.029 Light Truck MPG 16.575 16.666 16.795 16.823 g CH4/mi 0.035 0.031 0.031 0.031 g N2O/mi 0.049 0.043 0.043 0.043 Heavy Truck MPG 12.754 12.806 12.854 12.856 g CH4/mi 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033 g N2O/mi 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Diesel Passenger Vehicle MPG 27.558 27.662 29.006 29.889 g CH4/mi 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 g N2O/mi 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 Light Truck MPG 27.032 27.251 27.705 28.498 g CH4/mi 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 g N2O/mi 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 Heavy Truck MPG 17.343 17.588 18.797 18.858 g CH4/mi 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 g N2O/mi 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 Note: MPG is miles per gallon and is derived from EMFAC at the county level. CH4 and N2O emission factors are from the Community Protocol; Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck emission factors have data for 2005 and later; Heavy Truck only have 2010 data. Off-Road Off-road emissions include emissions from agriculture, construction, industrial, lawn and garden, light commercial, and recreational equipment. Annual emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O are available at the county level from the State’s OFFROAD model. To estimate values for each city, relevant indicator data are used to estimate the proportion of county-level emissions attributable to the city. Table B-7 lists the B-9 Appendix B: Methodology indicator used to estimate the City’s portion of emissions for each category and Table B-8 shows City- specific data. City- and county-level indicator data were obtained from SCAG. Table B-7. Off-road Emissions Indicators Category Indicator Agriculture Equipment Agriculture Jobs Construction Equipment Building Permits Issued Industrial Equipment Manufacturing Jobs Lawn and Garden Equipment Households Light Commercial Equipment Non- Manufacturing or Agriculture Jobs Recreational Equipment Population, Weighted by Median Income Table B-8. Off-road Emissions Indicator Data Ag. Jobs Building Permits Mfg. Jobs Households Other Jobs1 Population Income ($) 2005 City 3.786 1 136 2,884 3,646 8,058 123,702 County 13,562 25,623 461,099 3,178,736 4,045,922 9,816,200 48,606 % 0.03% 0.00% 0.03% 0.09% 0.09% 0.21% 2007 City 4.002 59 144 2,902 3,854 7,939 130,825 County 13,562 20,303 461,099 3,224,053 4,045,922 9,780,800 51,439 % 0.03% 0.29% 0.03% 0.09% 0.10% 0.21% 2010 City 3.69 2 114 3,100 3,572 8,064 142,286 County 10,598 7,466 362,157 3,454,093 3,758,244 9,818,605 56,000 % 0.03% 0.03% 0.03% 0.09% 0.10% 0.21% 2012 City 3 3 116 3,100 3,660 8,097 117,305 County 10,798 18,926 369,005 3,454,093 3,829,313 9,889,632 53,880 % 0.03% 0.02% 0.03% 0.09% 0.10% 0.18% Note: Some percentages may appear off due to rounding. Ag. = Agriculture. Mfg. = Manufacturing. 1 Other indicates non-manufacturing and non-agricultural. Water Emissions from water are indirect. Water requires energy to move from its source to final treatment and the energy for most of these processes is not captured in local utility data (i.e., the portion that is used in a home or business and therefore contained in the owner’s utility bill). This portion is termed the “embedded energy” in water and particularly for southern California, the energy embedded in water is high and should be accounted for in a community inventory. The California Energy Commission (CEC) developed a report, titled Refining Estimates for Water-Related Energy Use in California, which estimates the energy required to supply, convey, distribute, and treat water in northern and southern California. Recycled water is less energy-intensive because it does not require the supply and conveyance energy. Outdoor water infiltrates into the ground and therefore does not have the B-10 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach wastewater energy treatment component. Therefore, the emission factors are adjusted to account for the proportion of recycled and outdoor water. The amount of water used for indoor or outdoor use was not available at the City level; however, the 2010 Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, Urban Water Management Plan states that 61% of water is for indoor use for the City of Los Angeles. The water usage is assumed to be similar for the South Bay sub-region. Therefore, the embedded energy in a million gallon (MG) of water in the City is estimated in Table B-9 using the CEC report and estimated indoor vs. outdoor water usage in the region. Table B-9. Energy Embedded in Water Conventional1 (kWh/MG) Recycled (kWh/MG) Supply and Convey 9,727 -- Treatment 111 111 Distribution 1,272 1,272 Wastewater Treatment 1,911 1,911 Total 13,022 3,294 South Bay Factor 12,275.71 2,548.71 1 From CEC’s 2006 Refining Estimates for Water-Related Energy Use in California, for Indoor water use in southern California. Statewide Average Electricity For energy embedded in water, a statewide average emission factor is applied because water in the South Bay sub-region is supplied from various regions in the State (Table B-3). Similar to SCE data, statewide emission factors are not available for each inventory year. For 2010 and 2012, the 2009 statewide emission factors were used as the proxy year. Table B-3. California Statewide Electricity Emission Factors Year CO2 CH4 N2O Proxy Year Data Source 2005 948.28 0.03 0.011 NA U.S. Community Protocol 2007 919.64 0.029 0.010 NA U.S. Community Protocol 2010 658.68 0.029 0.006 2009 U.S. Community Protocol 2012 658.68 0.029 0.006 2009 U.S. Community Protocol NA: Not Applicable. Wastewater The emissions for wastewater include the CH4 and N2O emissions from processing which consist of three sources: stationary, process, and fugitive emissions. Stationary emissions are derived from combustion of digester gas at a centralized treatment facility. The City is served by the Los Angeles County Sanitation District’s Joint Water Pollution Control Plant (JWPCP). JWPCP is a centralized treatment facility that uses an anaerobic digester process and does not employ a formal nitrification/denitrification (N/DN) system. Detailed information regarding the amount of digester gas produces was not available, so an alternative method using City population information B-11 Appendix B: Methodology was used. Default factors from the Community Protocol were applied to estimate CH4 and N2O emissions for stationary emissions. Although CO2 emissions are also produced, the fuel source is considered a biofuel, and the resulting CO2 emissions are considered “biogenic” and are not reported4. Process emissions include N2O emissions as a result of N/DN processes at the treatment facility. All wastewater facilities have emissions from N/DN—some facilities have a formal N/DN process, which would result in greater N/DN emissions, but for the JWPCP, N/DN emissions are solely a result of natural processes. The recommended approach to estimating these emissions is through the population served and default factors listed in the Community Protocol. In an advanced, centralized treatment facility, stationary and process emissions are relatively small compared to fugitive emissions. The Community Protocol, and likewise ClearPath, recommends multiplying the population-derived emissions by 1.25 to account for commercial and industrial discharges to the system. Regions without any commercial and industrial sources should use a factor of 1.0. Because the City is largely residential, a factor of 1.0 was applied to these emissions. Fugitive emissions occur from inflow (septic systems) and effluent discharge. JWPCP reports facility- wide effluent, and effluent nitrogen content, which are factors used in estimating fugitive emissions (Table B-10). The City’s portion was determined by estimating the proportion of the population served by JWPCP. The ClearPath tool requires the daily N load in kg N per day. This is calculated using the factors listed in Table B-9 and the Community Protocol Equation WW.12: Daily N Load for the City (kg N/day) = Effluent X Effluent Nitrogen Content X gallons/liter X City Population/Service Population, Where Effluent is the facility-wide discharge in millions of gallons per day (MGD), Effluent Nitrogen Content is the average nitrogen content per volume (mg/L), and gallons/liter is a conversion factor (3.79). The Daily N Load entered into ClearPath was adjusted by a factor of 0.5 to account for the difference in emission factors for direct ocean discharge and stream/river discharge. In ClearPath, ocean discharge is not an option; however, the emissions are estimated to be ½ of those from discharge to a stream or river (see Community Protocol Appendix F). Therefore, the Daily N Load was adjusted by 0.5 to account for this difference. Table B-10. Los Angeles County Joint Water Pollution Control Plant Data Used in Wastewater Fugitive Emissions 2005 2007 2010 2012 Effluent (MGD) 403a 296b 237c 264d Effluent Nitrogen content (mg/L) 40a 36.7b 39.7 e 41.1d a Default assumption based on influent. b 2008 annual report data. c 2011 annual report data. d 2013 annual report data. e Based on communication with Los Angeles County Sanitation District for 2009. 4 Emissions from digester gas combustion are automatically calculated in ClearPath when population is entered. B-12 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Solid Waste Emissions from solid waste are primarily in the form of fugitive emissions of methane from decomposition. Emission factors are derived from the Community Protocol, based on the type of waste disposed. The State conducts a Waste Characterization Study (Study) every 4 to 6 years to determine the amount of waste attributable to each waste type. The Study is conducted at the State level by economic sector; therefore, community-level characterizations are not available. For the community inventory, the overall composition of California’s disposed waste stream was used to convert total tons into waste types (Table B-11). For the municipal inventory, the characterization for public administration was used (Table B-11). In addition to community-generated waste, some diverted green waste is used as landfill cover rather than importing landfill cover from other regions. This green waste is known as alternative daily cover (ADC) and is reported by CalRecycle for each community. The ADC characterization was determined through communication with the developers of ClearPath and does not vary by year or community. The emission factor to determine methane generation varies if the landfill operates a methane flare or generates electricity from methane capture. The Community Protocol recommends using an average factor of 75% recovery from landfill gas, although some landfills with have much higher gas recovery systems, and other landfills do not have any. Carbon dioxide generated by decomposition of waste in landfills is not considered anthropogenic because it would be produced through the natural decomposition process regardless of its disposition in the landfill. Nitrous oxide is not a by-product of decomposition and therefore no fugitive emissions of nitrous oxide are anticipated from this source. The waste characterizations and emission factors used to estimate emissions from solid waste are provided in Table B-11. The “Category in in the 2004 and 2008 Studies” detail which Study categories make up the ClearPath Category. Table B-11. Waste Characterization and Emission Factors for Solid Waste ClearPath Category Category in 2004 and 2008 Studies Alternative Daily Cover1 2004 Study2 2008 Study3 Public Administration Emission Factor1 Newspaper Newspaper 0% 2.2% 1.3% 5.5% 0.043 Office Paper White/Colored Ledger Paper + Other Office Paper + Other Miscellaneous Paper 0% 5.4% 4.9% 13% 0.203 Cardboard Uncoated Corrugated Cardboard + Paper Bags 0% 6.7% 5.2% 5.1% 0.120 Magazine/ Third Class Mail Magazines and Catalogs + Remainder/ Composite Paper 0% 6.5% 5.9% 15.4% 0.049 Food Scraps Food 0% 14.6% 15.5% 9.8% 0.078 Grass Leaves and Grass 30% 2.1% 1.9% 8.05% 0.038 Leaves Leaves and Grass 40% 2.1% 1.9% 8.05% 0.013 Lumber Branches and Stumps + Prunings and Trimmings 0% 9.6% 14.5% 0.1% 0.062 Branches Lumber 30% 2.6% 3.3% 5% 0.062 1 Breakdown from ClearPath Developers via e-mail dated June 19, 2014. Used for all inventory years. 2 2004 Waste Characterization Study for California, Overall Waste Stream. Used for 2005 inventory. Does not total 100% as not all waste is organic. 3 2008 Waste Characterization Study for California, Overall Waste Stream Used for 2007, 2010, 2012 inventories. Does not total 100% as not all waste is organic. B-13 Appendix B: Methodology Forecasts The forecasts are an estimate of what emissions in the City may be in 2020 and 2035. The forecasts were developed using standard methodologies under two scenarios: Business-as-Usual (BAU) and Adjusted BAU. Business-as-Usual Forecasts The BAU scenario uses current (2012) consumption patterns and predicted growth in the City in the absence of state and federal legislation that would reduce future emissions. The growth assumptions are those estimated by SCAG in their 2012 Regional Transportation Plan and are applied to emissions sectors based on their relevance. For example, future Residential Energy emissions were developed using current energy use per household (from the 2012 inventory) and the anticipated number of households in the future. Table B-16 shows the growth factors used to project emissions in the City. Adjusted Business-as-Usual Forecasts The Adjusted BAU scenario also uses growth estimates for the City, also accounts for legislation that will reduce emissions in the future, regardless of City actions. Table B-17 summarizes the legislation that will reduce the City’s emissions in the future and which sectors the legislation applies to. TableB-16. Emissions Sectors and Demographic Growth Indicators Sector Demographic Indicator Residential Energy Households Commercial/ Industrial Energy Jobs Solid Waste, Water, Wastewater, Aviation, Off-Road Sources Service Population (Population + Jobs) Transportation Vehicle Miles Traveled, modeled by SCAG Municipal Jobs Municipal Emissions1 SCAG: Southern California Association of Governments 1 The number of jobs in the City is used as an indicator for all municipal operation emissions except Aviation, which is forecast consistent with the community forecast (by change in service population). Table B-17. Legislation Applied to Adjusted BAU Forecasts Legislation Description Emissions Sector Affected Low Carbon Fuel Standard Reduce carbon intensity of transportation fuels 10% by 2020. On-road Transportation, Employee Commute, Vehicle Fleet AB 1493 and Advanced Clean Cars Implement GHG standards for passenger vehicles, implement zero-emission vehicle program, support clean fuels outlet regulation. On-road Transportation California Building Code Title 24 Improved energy efficiency standards for new residential and non-residential construction. Residential Energy, Non-residential Energy Renewable Portfolio Standard1 Provide 33% of electricity from renewable sources by 2020. Water Senate Bill X7-7 Reduce urban per capita water consumption 20% by 2020. Water 1 Potential GHG reductions from this legislation were not applied to the electricity in SCE’s service territory due to the uncertainty in SCE’s generation sources after the closure of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. B-14 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Low Carbon Fuel Standard, AB 1493, and Advanced Clean Cars Changes in on-road emissions in Los Angeles County were modeled using EMFAC, which models both the emissions with and without Low Carbon Fuel Standard and Pavley I. Additional modeling was conducted to estimate the change in emissions due to Advanced Clean Cars. The rate of reductions from on-road transportation measures through 2020 was assumed to be 0.0344% per year for gasoline and 0.0106% per year for diesel. After 2020, the rate of reductions was assumed to be 0.03452% per year for gasoline and 0.0251% per year for diesel. California Building Code Title 24 Title 24 updates will raise the minimum energy efficiency standards for new buildings, thereby decreasing the expected energy consumption of future development in the City. Under the adjusted BAU scenario, it was assumed that the 2013 Title 24 standards that went into effect in 2014 will make new residential and non-residential buildings more efficient than they would be under the 2008 Title 24 standards for new residential buildings. The energy savings were estimated using analyses developed by the California Energy Commission and the applied to the expected new development in the City to 2020 and 2035. The rate of reductions was applied to the City’s 2012 energy use (kWh or therms) per household (for Residential energy) or per job (for Commercial energy). Savings were applied to new development anticipated in the City. Detailed energy savings assumptions are below. Residential Residential electricity is estimated to be 32.6% lower under the new standards.5 This percentage savings is relative to heating, cooling, lighting and water heating only and do not include other appliances, outdoor lighting that is not attached to buildings, plug loads, or other energy uses. Electricity consumption due to heating, cooling, lighting, and water heating accounts for 34% of total household electricity use.6 Therefore, the percentage of total residential electricity that will be reduced as a result of the 2013 Title 24 standards is 11.1%. Residential natural gas savings were estimated 5.8% lower under the new standards. Again, this percentage savings pertains only to the energy sources affected by Title 24 Standards. Natural gas consumption due to space and water heating accounts for 86% of total household natural gas use.7 Therefore, the percentage of total residential natural gas that will be reduced as a result of the 2013 Title 24 standards is 5.0%. Commercial Commercial Electricity savings were estimated to be 21.8% lower under the new standards. Title 24- related measures would impact 77.2% of total electricity use in commercial buildings8; therefore, 16.8% reduction in electricity consumption may be expected in new commercial development. 5 CEC Impact Analysis, California’s 2013 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, July 2013. CEC-400-2013-008. 6 CEC 2009 California Residential Appliance Saturation Appliance Study, October 2010. CEC-200-2010-004. 7 CEC 2009 California Residential Appliance Saturation Appliance Study, October 2010. CEC-200-2010-004. 8 CEC 2006. California Commercial End-Use Survey. March 2006. CEC-400-2006-005. B-15 Appendix B: Methodology Natural gas savings were estimated to be 16.8% under the new standards compared to the previous standards. Heating and cooling account for 69.7% of natural gas consumption in commercial facilities; therefore, 11.7% reduction in natural gas consumption may be expected from 2013 Title 24 standards applied to new commercial development. Renewable Portfolio Standard The Renewable Portfolio Standard will be fully implemented in 2020. The level of implementation varies by utility; however, ICLEI estimates that the average statewide level of implementation is 5% per year, compounded annually. As noted in the Report, this reduction is only taken for electricity used in the transport and treatment of water, which moves throughout the State. The reduction is not taken for electricity wholly within SCE’s territory. Senate Bill X7-7 SB X7-7 will be implemented by individual water districts. For the City’s water provider, California Water Service Company, the level of implementation was estimated using an annualized reduction rate from the Company’s baseline water consumption rate (141 gallons per capita per day, GPCD) to the target water consumption rate (126 GPCD). Target Setting The state-aligned targets are provided to assist the City in determining appropriate emission reduction goals. Recommended targets are based on existing California climate change legislation and State guidance relevant to establishing a GHG reduction target. While State goals are based on a 1990 baseline year, the City’s baseline year is 2005. Therefore, the reduction targets are expressed as a percent reduction below 2005 levels. Targets are recommended for 2020 to align with AB 32 and 2035, which is a midpoint between the 2020 goal and the State’s long-term 2050 goal. Planning beyond 2035 is considered speculative, as legislation and technology may change significantly before 2050. While it is important for continued reductions well beyond 2035, no local targets are recommended at this time. Table B-18 provides a summary of the State’s goals and the State’s guidance to local governments regarding GHG reduction targets. This guidance applies to and communitywide emissions reductions efforts. The City has adopted a carbon neutrality goal for municipal operations by 2020. Table B-18. Summary of State Reduction Targets and Guidance on Local Government Targets Aligned with State Targets 2020 Interim Year Between 2020-2050 2050 State Targets (AB 32 and EO S-3-05) 1990 levels NA 80% below 1990 levels State Guidance on Local Government Targets (AB 32) Scoping Plan Recommended Target and Attorney General’s Office Guidance 15% below 2005-2008 levels Demonstrate a trajectory toward statewide 2050 levels (e.g., 49% below 2005 levels by 2035) NA B-16 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Table B-19 demonstrates how the local targets are aligned with State targets. Table B-19. Comparison of 1990 Baseline Targets vs. 2005 Baseline Targets Target Year Percent below 1990 Emission Levels Percent below 2005 Emission Levels 2020 0.0% 15.0% 2021 2.7% 17.3% 2022 5.3% 19.5% 2023 8.0% 21.8% 2024 10.7% 24.1% 2025 13.3% 26.3% 2026 16.0% 28.6% 2027 18.7% 30.9% 2028 21.3% 33.1% 2029 24.0% 35.4% 2030 26.7% 37.7% 2031 29.3% 39.9% 2032 32.0% 42.2% 2033 34.7% 44.5% 2034 37.3% 46.7% 2035 40.0% 49.0% 11/17/2015City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Reduction Measures2015 2020 2035Measure Notes/AssumptionsGHG(MTCO2e)GHG(MTCO2e)GHG(MTCO2e)‐‐‐Measure 1.1Increase Energy Savings through the SCE Energy Leader Partnership53.55 68.66 215.79Measure 2.1Conduct Municipal Building Energy Audit  Measure 2.2Require Green Building CertificationMeasure 2.3Implement Water Leak Detection ProgramMeasure 2.4Participate in Demand Response ProgramsMeasure 2.5Participate in Direct Install Program37.8037.80118.79Measure 2.6Adopt a Procurement Policy for Energy Efficient Equipment15.75 15.75 49.51Measure 2.7Install Cool RoofsMeasure 2.8Require New or Retrofitted Buildings to Exceed Title 24Measure 2.9Increase Recycled Water UseMeasure 2.10Retrofit HVAC Equipment & Water Pumps‐15.11 47.49Measure 2.11Track Additional Energy SavingsMeasure 2.12Utilize an Energy Management System‐165.45 519.97Measure 3.1Retrofit Traffic Signals and Outdoor Lighting ‐165.45 519.97Measure 3.2Upgrade or Incorporate Water‐Conserving LandscapeMeasure 3.3Plant Trees for Shade and Carbon Sequestration‐637.53 196.88Measure 4.1Develop an Energy Reinvestment FundMeasure 4.2Purchase Carbon Offsets‐637.53 196.8853.55 871.64 932.64Final Draft v2Interested. Needs to go to council.Supporting MeasureUpgrades to HVAC and domestic hot water equipment were proposed in 2013; however, these projects have not been implemented as of 2015. This measure assumes that these project will be implemented by 2020.Goal 4: Reduce Energy Consumption in the Long TermGoal ActionGoal 1: Participate in Education, Outreach, and Planning for Energy EfficiencySilver LevelSupporting MeasureGoal 2: Increase Energy Efficiency in Municipal BuildingsSupporting MeasureSupporting MeasureUnder ConsiderationTOTALNo major project identified; however, the City will re‐evaluate as funding is identified.Goal 3: Increase Energy Efficiency in City InfrastructureLED conversion for all city‐owned streetlights will be completed in 2015. Upgrades to park lighting were proposed in 2013; however, these projects have not been implemented as of 2015. This measure identifies future project beyond 2015.Adopted water efficient landscaping ordinance in 2010. City can save 2,282 kWh annually per acre of lawn converted to water conservation landscaping.In order to achieve municipal carbon neutrality, the City will need to purchase carbon offsets to balance the remaining energy related emissions in 2020 and 2035.CompletedNine municipal buildings participated in 2014.Already in place. COG supported.InterestedInterested in free audits from Cal Water (if available).Implemented/in progressTracking DataPotential program. The average mature tree can save an average of 170 kWh and absorb as much as 48 lbs. of CO2 per year.Adopted by council in 2013. Procurement policies can reduce government facility energy costs by about 5–10 percent (LBNL, 2002). Since the city has already significantly reduced its energy consumption through other measures, it is assumed that the reduction potential of the procurement policy would be closer to 5%.City's green building code requires the installation of cool roofs. Replacing a 1,000 sq. ft. dark roof with a cool roof can reduce approximately 10 MT CO2e.City's green building code requires buildings to exceed Title 24 energy efficiency requirements by 15%.City uses recycled water for 75 percent of parks, greenbelts & medians.  Approximately 1,873 kWh can be saved for every acre foot (AF) of water use replaced by recycled water.Supporting MeasureTracking DataTracking DataUnder ConsiderationTracking Data 00 ‐ 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,5002005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035MT CO2eAdditional Reductions NeededLocal Energy ReductionsABAU (State Measures)Reduction GoalsFIGURE 1: State and Local Reductions Comparison with TargetsCity of Hermosa Beach, 2005 ‐2035State measures and reduction goals are from the City of Hermosa Beach GHG Inventory, Forecasting and Target‐Setting Report for an Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan, 2015.Local energy reductions are based on City's feedback on measures selection.City of Hermosa Beach will need additional reductions to meet the 2020 and 2035 reduction targets. 23%15%12%27%23%0.1%Buildings & FacilitiesEmployee CommuteSolid WasteOutdoor LightingFleet & EquipmentWater Delivery4002662134714001050100150200250300350400450500MT CO2eBuildings & FacilitiesEmployee CommuteSolid WasteOutdoor LightingFleet & EquipmentWater DeliveryCity of Hermosa Beach Municipal 2020 ABAU Inventory Final Draft v29/16/2015City of Hermosa Beach Community Energy Reduction MeasuresGoal Measure ActionResponsibility/ action needed for implementationGHG Reduction Potential Participation RateGoal 1. Increase Energy Efficiency (EE) in Existing Residential UnitsMeasure 1.1 EE Training and EducationActionsPost Links on Website/social media and provide materials at public events Ongoing, only websiteMediumEmail list for e‐mail blasts of new information or trainingsCity & COG/e‐newsletter, more info expected from COGLowPromote an annual EE FairTable during existing events, solar homes tourLowCreate a resource centerExisting (resource wall)LowHire/Designate Energy Advocate Ongoing, env. analystHighMeasure 1.2 Increase Participation in Existing EE Programs14                      66                        ActionsPartner with COG and utilities in outreach programsCOG/OngoingHighDirect staff outreach Staff educated & availableLow‐MediumMeasure 1.3 Establish, Promote, or Require Home Energy EvaluationsActionsThird‐party inspectors verify >Title 24 compliance HERSMediumPromote home energy auditsOngoing, info on website, consider flyers and handoutsLowEstablish new "checkup" programCity/Ongoing, landscaping check completed, more to goHighMeasure 1.4 Promote, Incentivize, or Require Residential Home Energy Renovations4,037                 19,175                ActionsPromote existing incentivized programs such as Energy Upgrade California Ongoing, permit fees rebateHighDevelop/promote green building program Ongoing, on website but no updatesHighPromote financing programs such as PACE programsOngoing HighPermit processing facilitation: waived fees OngoingHighPermit processing facilitation: onlineOngoing, within a yearHighGoal 2. Increase Energy Efficiency (EE) in New Residential DevelopmentMeasure 2.1 Encourage or Require EE Standards Exceeding Title 24 2                         11                        ActionsPromote green building programs or Tier 1/Tier 2 at plan checkOngoingHighPermit processing facilitation: waived feesOngoingHighPermit processing facilitation: onlinefutureMediumCreate an Energy Award Program for near net‐zero energy homesCity Community Development Department/OngoingHighAdopt an ordinance to require reach codesOngoingHighSupporting Measure Low  Supporting Measure  Medium‐High  Low‐Medium The actions taken by the City and COG can increase participation levels of other programs within Goal 1 by 133%2035 GHG Reductions Achieved2020 GHG Reductions AchievedThe actions taken by the City and COG can increase participation levels of other programs within Goal 1 by 125%  Goal Measure ActionResponsibility/ action needed for implementationGHG Reduction Potential Participation Rate2035 GHG Reductions Achieved2020 GHG Reductions AchievedGoal 3. Increase Energy Efficiency (EE) in Existing Commercial UnitsMeasure 3.1EE Training and EducationActionsPost Links on Website/social media and provide materials at public events Ongoing, only websiteMediumEmail list for e‐mail blasts of new information or trainings Ongoing, e‐newsletterLowEstablish and annual EE Fair Table during existing eventsLowCreate a resource Center Existing (resource wall)LowHire/Designate Energy Advocate Ongoing, 1 staffHighMeasure 3.2Increase Participation in Existing EE Programs199                    947                     ActionsPartner with COG and utilities in outreach programsOngoingHighDirect staff outreach Staff educated & availableLow‐MediumMeasure 3.3 Promote or Require Non‐Residential Energy Audits 212                    1,007                  ActionsThird‐party inspectors verify >Title 24 complianceHERSMediumPromote business energy auditsOngoing, info on website, consider flyers and handoutsHighMeasure 3.4 Promote or Require Commercial Energy Retrofits2,599                 12,347                ActionsPromote existing incentivized programs such as Energy Upgrade California Ongoing, permit fees rebateHighDevelop/promote green building program Ongoing, on website but no updatesMediumPromote financing programs such as PACE programsOngoing , LA PACE, no promotion on websiteMediumPermit processing facilitation: waived feesOngoingHighPermit processing facilitation: onlinefutureMediumGoal 4. Increase Energy Efficiency (EE) in New Commercial DevelopmentMeasure 4.1 Encourage or Require EE Standards Exceeding Title 24119                    563                     ActionsPromote green building programs or Tier 1/Tier 2 at plan checkOngoingHighPermit processing facilitation: waived feesOngoingHighPermit processing facilitation: onlinefutureMediumCreate an Energy Award Program for near net‐zero energy businessesCity Community Development Department/OngoingHighAdopt an ordinance to require reach codesOngoingHigh Medium  Low‐Medium  Medium‐High  Low‐Medium The actions taken by the City and COG can increase participation levels of other programs within Goal 3 by 133%Supporting Measure Goal Measure ActionResponsibility/ action needed for implementationGHG Reduction Potential Participation Rate2035 GHG Reductions Achieved2020 GHG Reductions AchievedGoal 5. Increase Energy Efficiency (EE) through Water Efficiency (WE)Measure 5.1 Promote or Require WE through SBX7‐7247                    1,175                  ActionsPost Links on Website/social media and provide materials at public eventsOngoingMediumEmail list for e‐mail blasts of new information or trainingsOngoingLowRequire low‐irrigation landscapingCompletedHighMeasure 5.2 Promote WE Standards Exceeding SB X7‐79                         45                        ActionsStaff conduct direct outreach to HOAs, businesses, community groupsYesHighPromote use of greywater systemsYes. City to clarify whether greywater allowed.HighWork with Water District to increase recycled water potentialOngoingHighPromote rain harvesting rebatesrain barrel programHighGoal 6. Decrease Energy Demand through Reducing Urban Heat Island EffectMeasure 6.1 Promote Tree Planting for Shading and EE95                      450                     ActionsPromote tree planting at plan checkOngoing, list for city treesHighDevelop a tree‐planting programOngoing, potential part of general plan updateHighMeasure 6.2 Incentivize or Require Light‐Reflecting SurfacesActionsCool Roofs Ordinancefuture (former mandatory ordinance challenged by CEC; can't enforce)Medium‐High Unable to quantify GHG reduction potential due to unknown variables (i.e. market participation rate, average roof size for residential/commercial buildings).  Low‐Medium  Low  Medium  Medium  City of Hermosa Beach Community 2020 ABAU Inventory17%30%3%48%2%Commercial/Industrial EnergyResidential EnergySolid WasteTransportation & Mobile SourcesWater & Wastewater18,74233,9533,39153,8571,747010,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,000MT CO2eCommercial/Industrial EnergyResidential EnergySolid WasteTransportation & Mobile SourcesWater & Wastewater FIGURE 1: Local Energy Reduction Quantification by GoalFIGURE 2: Local Energy Reduction Quantification by GoalCity of Hermosa Beach Community Energy Reduction Measures54%0.03%40%2%3%1%Existing ResidentialNew ResidentialExisting CommercialNew CommercialWater EfficiencyUrban Heat Island4,051 2 3,011 119 257 95  ‐ 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500MT CO2eExisting ResidentialNew ResidentialExisting CommercialNew CommercialWater EfficiencyUrban Heat Island State measures and reduction goals are from the City of Hermosa Beach GHG Inventory, Forecasting and Target‐Setting Report for an Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan, 2015.Local energy reductions are based on City's feedback on measures selection.City of Hermosa Beach will meet their reduction goals in 2020 and 2035 with the help of both state and local reduction measures.FIGURE 3: State and Local Reductions Comparison with TargetsCity of Hermosa Beach, 2005 ‐2035116,58669,952 ‐ 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,0002005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035MT CO2eAdditional Reductions NeededLocal Energy ReductionsABAU (State Measures)Reduction Goals Energy Efficiency Chapters of Climate Action Plans for South Bay Cities Energy Reduction Measures Presentation for the City of Hermosa Beach City Council November 24, 2015 Presented by: Kim Fuentes, SBCCOG Agenda • Overview of Energy Leader Partnership • EECAP Project Background • Community Energy Reduction Measures • Municipal Energy Reduction Measures • Next Steps Overview of Energy Leader Partnership •The City of Hermosa Beach participants in the Energy Leader Partnership program as a member of South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) who partners with Southern California Edison to implement this program. The SBCCOG provides an on-call energy engineer to assist the city with identifying energy efficiency projects and assisting with the application process for rebates and incentives. •The Energy Leader Partnership program is a tiered system providing increased incentives as the city completes more energy efficiency projects. The city works with the community to share information about rebates, incentives, and Demand Response programs. At the highest level of Platinum, a city can earn as much as 18 cents per kWh over and above the current SCE incentive. Current Tier Level Gold With the completion of the scheduled lighting project for Q1 2016, Hermosa Beach will move to the Platinum tier level. Current Energy Leader activities include: •City of Hermosa Beach developed its Energy Action Plan. •City became a Beacon Award Participant. •A City Kiosk was created with SCE energy efficiency rebate information. •City developed an e-newsletter with SCE rebate section. SCE residential rebates available: •Participate in the refrigerator recycling program and receive $50 for old working refrigerator. •Receive up to $75 rebate when purchasing Energy Star’s most efficient refrigerator model. •Receive up to $200 rebate for upgrading your single-speed or two speed pool pump for a qualified model. Project Background Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan (EECAP) What is the EECAP? Background: • Funded through Southern California Edison (SCE) & Southern California Gas (SCG) to meet goals from the CA Long-Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan • Kicked off early 2014 – South Bay Cities and Sub-region Scope: • Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory for municipal operations and community emissions •Energy efficiency strategies for emissions reductions • A step towards a Climate Action Plan Forecasts and Targets Forecasts: • Business as Usual (BAU): Emissions based on projected growth • Adjusted BAU (ABAU): Emissions based on projected growth and State measures that will provide local emission reductions Targets: •State guidelines suggest 15% below 2005 levels by 2020 •A path toward the State’s 2050 goal would require 49% reduction below 2005 levels by 2035 •Municipal: Carbon Neutral Community ABAU & Reduction Targets - 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035MT CO2eWater & Wastewater Solid Waste Commercial Energy Residential Energy Transportation & Mobile Sources 15% below 2005 49% below 2005 Path to 2035 from 2020 ABAU (-3.1%/yr) Municipal ABAU & Reduction Targets Note: Emissions from municipal operations account for about 1%of community emissions. 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035MT CO2eWater Pumping Solid Waste Buildings & Facilities Outdoor Lighting Employee Commute Vehicle Fleet Path to 2020 from 2012 Energy Efficiency Strategies for Emissions Reductions Goal: •Reduce energy-related GHG emissions •Assist in achieving 2020 & 2035 GHG reduction targets Process: •Meetings with City staff to select strategies •Calculate reductions & finalize selections •Adopt a resolution •Incorporate data into the EECAP report Community Energy Reduction Measures Actions to reduce energy from the City’s community operations Community Reduction Measures Spreadsheet Community Reduction Measures Spreadsheet Reductions quantified Responsible Party / Implementation Notes Community Reduction Targets 116,586 69,952 - 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035MT CO2eAdditional Reductions Needed Local Energy Reductions ABAU (State Measures) Reduction Goals Community 2020 ABAU Emissions 17% 30% 3% 48% 2% Commercial/Industrial Energy Residential Energy Solid Waste Transportation & Mobile Sources Water & Wastewater Municipal Energy Reduction Measures Actions to reduce energy from the City’s municipal operations Municipal Reduction Measures Spreadsheet Municipal Reduction Targets 0 0 - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035MT CO2eAdditional Reductions Needed Local Energy Reductions ABAU (State Measures) Reduction Goals Municipal 2020 ABAU Emissions 23% 15% 12% 27% 23% 0.1% Buildings & Facilities Employee Commute Solid Waste Outdoor Lighting Fleet & Equipment Water Delivery What’s Next? Project Schedule and Next Steps Project Schedule-Next Steps 1. Assessment & Planning Report 2. EECAP Template 3. Inventories, Forecasts, and Target-Setting 4. Measure Development 5. Measures Adoption6. Draft EECAP 7. Final EECAP Fall 2015Fall 2015Late Fall 2015 Questions? Sarah Favrot Sarah.Favrot@atkinsglobal.com Laura Zahn laura@southbaycities.org CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KRISTY MORRIS, ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST SUBJECT: 11-24-15 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING – ITEM 6(a) SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION CLARIFYING DATES ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY REPORTS DATE: NOVEMBER 23, 2015 CC: TOM BAKALY, ANN YANG The purpose of this memorandum is to answer questions relating to differences in the annual consumption data between the 2013 GSE report and the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) At-a-Glance update. In addition, how do Tables 2 and 3 in the 2013 GSE report relate to each other? In response, these two different reports were prepared separately for specific purposes. Both reports use Southern California Edison (SCE) corporate view data, however the GSE report uses the 2013 annual data, and the ‘At-a-Glance’ report uses 2010 data as a baseline. The GSE report was prepared in 2013 for the Hermosa Beach municipal facility audit using 2013 data. The ‘At a Glance’ report is prepared by the SBCCOG for each South Bay city using 2010 as a baseline year. Regarding the differences in the values in Tables 2 and 3 in the 2013 GSE report, Table 2 shows annual energy usage at the facility whereas Table 3 shows only the lighting portion of the annual energy usage at the facility. Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 15-0814 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015 PLAN HERMOSA (GENERAL PLAN/LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM) UPDATE AND NEXT STEPS (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that Council provide input on the proposed community engagement approach for PLAN Hermosa. Background In July 2013, the City of Hermosa Beach initiated the process of updating and integrating the City’s General Plan and Local Coastal Program, collectively referred to as PLAN Hermosa. The City has received two grants for this effort: from the Strategic Growth Council for a ‘Comprehensive Blueprint for Sustainability and a Low Carbon Future’; and from the Coastal Commission for Local Coastal Program Assistance. Central to the creation of PLAN Hermosa has been an extensive community engagement process to ensure the PLAN reflects the community’s vision for the future of Hermosa Beach. To date, the City and consultant team have engaged several hundred community members through workshops, an educational series, online surveys, and study sessions with the City Council and Planning Commission. The City has also utilized newsletters, e-notify, the City website, web and print ads in local papers, and other means to communicate with the community about the process. It is anticipated that the first draft of PLAN Hermosa will be available for public review by mid- December. Proposed Community Engagement Approach and Communication Methods As we prepare to release the public draft of PLAN Hermosa and conduct additional outreach and community engagement over the course of the next seven months, staff and the consultant team have outlined a proposed approach to conducting outreach activities, holding study sessions and public hearings, and communicating the importance of this process to the community for the remainder of the project. With much of the funding for this effort coming from grants with contract deadlines, it is anticipated that the hearing and adoption process will take place between January and June 2016. Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0814 The Outreach and Communications Matrix (Attachment 1) identifies the approximate timing and types of events - from outreach/educational events to study sessions and public hearings. The Outreach and Communications Matrix additionally organizes the community engagement activities into three phases - awareness, understanding, and commitment - to make clear the purpose of each event and help focus the message used in the range of communication methods. ·Awareness Phase - January/February This initial phase of outreach and communication will focus on ensuring the community is aware that the draft PLAN is available to review and will introduce the topics of the PLAN through presentations to community groups, online engagement, joint study sessions, and a community open house. This phase will include the broadest scope of communication methods in an attempt to make sure that everyone who would like to be involved is aware of the upcoming opportunities to participate. ·Understanding Phase - March/April The second phase of outreach and communication will focus on building a greater level of understanding of the PLAN’s role in future decision-making, particularly for the City’s advisory commissions/committees. This phase will utilize a variety of digital communication methods and the City’s standard legal notifications for meetings with each advisory committee/commission. ·Commitment Phase - May/June The final phase of outreach and communication will encourage participation in the public hearing process to voice support and ideas for the PLAN. This phase will also utilize a variety of digital communication methods and the City’s standard legal notifications for meetings with the Planning Commission and City Council. Summary Between now and June 2016, the community will have five different ways, and a minimum of 12 in- person opportunities to help shape PLAN Hermosa before it is adopted by the City Council. The different ways to participate include: 1.Request a presentation to your organization 2.Attend the open house event 3.Participate online in surveys, ideas, and discussion through SpeakUp Hermosa 4.Watch or provide public comment at one of 10 study sessions or public hearings 5.Provide written comments, ask questions, or discuss your concerns An engaged community is vital to both the adoption process, and ultimately the successful implementation of PLAN Hermosa. The proposed outreach and communications approach attempts to balance providing ample opportunities for the community to participate, while still meeting the Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™ Staff Report REPORT 15-0814 requirements of the grants to be completed in a timely fashion. Work Products to Date The work products prepared for PLAN Hermosa thus far are available on the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan webpage at <http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=767>. Previous activities as well as plans already adopted by the City and other background resources may also be reviewed at this webpage. Attachments: 1.PLAN Hermosa - Outreach and Communications Matrix Respectfully Submitted by: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Approved: Tom Bakaly, City Manager Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™ January February March April May June Outreach/Educatio nal Events - Presentations to Community Groups Meetings with Technical Advisory Committee Members - Speak Up Hermosa - Online Engagement - Community Open House - Presentations to Community Groups - Speak Up Hermosa - Online Engagement - Presentations to Community Groups - Speak Up Hermosa - Online Engagement Study Sessions - Joint Study Session - Intro to PLAN Hermosa - Planning, Parks and Recreation, and Public Works Commissions, EPAC, HBCSD School Board - City Council Study Session - Intro to PLAN Hermosa - Planning Commission Study Session(s) - Land Use, Mobility Elements, EIR Public Comment period - Planning Commission Study Session(s) - Governance, Public Safety, Sustainability + Conservation, Infrastructure Elements - City Council Study Session(s) Public Hearings - Public Works Commission Public Hearing - EPAC Public Hearing - Parks and Recreation Commission Public Hearing - Planning Commission Public Hearing - PLAN Hermosa Adoption, Coastal Implementing Ordinance Adoption, EIR Certification Recommendations to Council - City Council Public Hearing(s) - PLAN Hermosa Adoption, EIR Certification, Coastal Implementing Ordinance Adoption, Submission Package to Coastal Commission Associated Communications Efforts Schedule Awareness Phase Understanding Phase Commitment Phase Message: PLAN Hermosa is available for review; There are many ways to participate in the process Communication Methods: Website Update, E-Notify, Monthly Newsletter, Postcard Mailer, Press Release/Local News Articles, Online Engagement/Social Media Campaign, Nixle Alert Message: PLAN Hermosa sets the stage for preservation and change in Hermosa Beach over the next 25 years, don't forget to share your ideas in this process Note: Public Comment Period for PLAN Hermosa Environmental Imapct Report is open for public comments until 3/21/16 Communication Methods: E-Notify, Monthly Newsletter, Online Engagement/Social Media, Nixle Alert Message: Council will be taking action on PLAN Hermosa, be sure to voice your support and ideas for the future of Hermosa Beach Communication Methods: E-Notify, Monthly Newsletter, Press Release/Local News Articles Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 2015 STRATEGIC PLAN Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/5/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. City of Hermosa Beach: Strategic Plan VISION 2030 HERMOSA BEACH 2030 is The Best Little Beach City! Our Hometown Spirit, Our Beach Life Style, Our Eclectic Downtown, Our Vibrant Entry Corridors Our Commitment to Environmental Sustainability, MAKES US DIFFERENT AND SETS US APART. POLICY AGENDA 2015 Top Priority Long Term Financial Plan (linked to City Infrastructure and Facilities Needs) and Debt Policies Downtown Revitalization Strategy Community Policing Action Plan Street Program Funding for Catch Up and Ongoing Maintenance Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation Avenue Mobility/Improvement Project Hotel Development High Priority Before/After School Program Water: Policy Direction Compensation Policy and Labor Contracts South Park Phase 2 Comprehensive City Facilities Plan Homeless Strategy and Action Plan GOALS 2020 Commitment to a Safe Community Financially Sound City Government High Performing City Providing 1st Class Services More Livable, Sustainable Beach City Enhanced Economic Development Through Revitalized Downtown and Entry Corridors HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT MISSION The mission of the HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT is to Be Financially, Environmentally Responsible to Govern the Community and to Provide 1st Class Municipal Services in a Customer Friendly Manner. through Valued Employees and Volunteers. MANAGEMENT AGENDA 2015 Top Priority Fire/Police Temporary Location 8th Street Sidewalk General Plan/Local Coastal Program – Blueprint for a Low Carbon Future Late Night Action Plan Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan Skechers Development High Priority Priority Based Budgeting Library Plan Community Theater Trans Pacific Fiber Optic Cable Public Safety Service and Staffing Study Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. MANAGEMENT IN PROGRESS 2015 Nixle Communications Plan for Internal and External Use Community Risk Assessment Downtown Police Unit: Full Time Officer Community Police Academy: 1st Class Emergency Operations Plan: Update and Training Fireground Survival (FGS) Training Program Police Open House Pizza with Police Ambulance Operator Program Full Time Employee for Ambulance Operator Program Fire Wellness – Fitness Initiative Program Crime Analysis: Refinement Volunteer Police Program: Recruitment Emergency Operations Center Detective Case Management: Review 1736 House: Direction Neighborhood Watch and VIP Program Multi Hazards Mitigation Plan: Development Fire/EMS Standards of Coverage: Funding Police Community Calendar: Development Police Officer Recruitment and Hiring Sex Crimes, Violence, Trafficking Storm Water Plan: Development Eden Systems Purchase Orders for All Departments Oil Settlement: Bond Issuance e Meeting/Paperless Agenda for Boards & Commissions OPEB Analysis/PERS Review Annual Update Online Parking Permits Health Insurance Modifications Priority based Budgeting Update Fiscal Health: Live Model Five Year Financial Plan/Fiscal Model Vehicle Replacement: Update Report Sewer Upgrade: Bond Issuance E-payables Implementation New Animal License System Demand based Pricing Parking: Implementation Theater Rental: Evaluation, Policy Direction Liability Insurance Program for Contract Class Instructors Oil Debt Payment Street Paving Program: Update Report CNG Fueling Options Report City Yard Renovation/Toxic Concern Mitigation Sewer Hydro Jetting Contract Council Cameras Solid Waste Collection: Update Report Employee appreciation Program: Enhancements Land and Asset Management Software New Training System for Part-Time Employees Part-Time Employee Recognition AES Rebuild Intervener Site Reuse Special Olympics: Direction 4th of July Regular Holiday Weekend Parking Phase 1: Commercial Zone Smart Parking Purchase Development Process – One Stop Shop Citywide Filming Strategy Parking Phase 2: Multi Space Meter Pay Station MAJOR PROJECTS 2015 Police Training Facility, including Firing Range Fire Training Tower Street Improvements Projects Street Sharrows Citywide Conservation Upgrades (LED Lights) South Park Project Phase I Valley Park Playground Resurface/Renovation Surf Legends Memorial Project Protective Bollards on Strand Clark Field and Lawn Bowling electrical Design and ADA Access Outdoor Kiosks: Beach, South Park, Valley Park String Lights on Pier Plaza Signage at Parking Structure Plaza Granite Cubes and Tile Removal Performance Report 2014 – 2015 Mayor and City Council Mayor, Town Council and Town Manager Hermosa Beach, California June 2015 Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Phone: (386) 246-6250 9 Flagship Court Fax: (386) 246-6252 Palm Coast, FL 32137-3373 E-mail: sumekassoc@gmail.com Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 1 Hermosa Beach Vision 2029 HERMOSA BEACH 2029 is The Best Little Beach City! Our Hometown Spirit, Our Beach Life Style, Our Eclectic Downtown, Our Vibrant Entry Corridors Our Commitment to Environmental Sustainability, MAKES US DIFFERENT AND SETS US APART. Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 2 Hermosa Beach Municipal Government Mission and Core Services The mission of the HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT is to Be Financially, Environmentally Responsible to Govern the Community and to Provide 1st Class Municipal Services in a Customer Friendly Manner. through Valued Employees and Volunteers. Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 3 City of Hermosa Beach Goals 2019 Commitment to a Safe Community Financially Sound City Government High Performing City Providing 1st Class Services More Livable, Sustainable Beach City Enhanced Economic Development Through Revitalized Downtown and Entry Corridors Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 4 City of Hermosa Beach Policy Agenda 2014 TOP PRIORITY Oil Ballot Measure for 2014 Downtown Core Development Public Safety Service and Staffing Study Municipal Carbon Neutral Action Plan General Plan/Local Coastal Program/Blueprint for a Low Carbon Future South Park: Upgrade Pacific Coast Highway Corridor Beautification Plan HIGH PRIORITY Schools Strategy and Specific Actions: Support for Top Quality Schools Sewer Replacement Program and Funding Mechanism Capital Improvement Program and Policy Comprehensive City Facilities Master Plan Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 5 City of Hermosa Beach Management Agenda 2014 TOP PRIORITY Business Improvement District (BID) for Pier Plaza: Preparation Community Dialog/Decision Making Tool: Adoption, Implementation Late Night Action Plan: Update, Direction AES Rebuild Undersea Cable (Addition): Direction Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 6 GOAL 1 COMMITMENT TO A SAFE COMMUNITY ACHIEVEMENTS 2014 – 2015 ★ ★ 1. Public Safety Service and Staffing Study: Increased Level of Service, Increased Police Staffing; Reviewed Hiring practices Crime Analyst Position: Trend Analysis 2. Fire Truck and Rescue Ambulance: Purchased 3. Police Training Facility, including Shooting Range: Saving Overtime 4. Fire Collaboration with Manhattan: Administrative Battalion Chief (6 months) 5. Fire Study: Reaffirmed Chief, No Deputy Fire Chief, Study with Manhattan Beach Partnership Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 7 OTHER CITY ACHIEVEMENTS 2014 – 2015 ★ ★ 1. Late Night Action Plan: Update 2. Conditional Use Permit Enforcement Team 3. Lower Crime Rate Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 8 GOAL 2 FINANCIALLY SOUND CITY GOVERNMENT ACHIEVEMENTS 2014 – 2015 ★ ★ ★ 1. Oil Measure Process/Election Work: Product by City Staff; Model to Conduct a Controversial Election set the Standard for Future Development 2. Priority Based Budget: Format and Process 3. Classification and Compensation Study: 5% below Medians, Making Adjustment to 75% Goal; Demonstrated value of City Employees Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 9 OTHER CITY ACHIEVEMENTS 2014 – 2015 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6. Capital Improvement Program and Policy 7. Citywide Service Level/Performance Benchmark System 8. Phone System: Upgrade 9. Website: Upgrade on oil 10. Electronic Patient Care Records and Billing 11. Five Year Financial Plan/Fiscal Model 12. Recreation Software Upgrade and Fee Review 13. Overall Financial Solvency: No Structural Deficit Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 10 GOAL 3 HIGH PERFORMING CITY PROVIDING 1st CLASS SERVICES ACHIEVEMENTS 2014 – 2015 ★ 1. Comprehensive City Facilities Plan: Initiated Process 2. City Organization: Enhancements Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 11 OTHER CITY ACHIEVEMENTS 2014 – 2015 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1. Public Information and Communications Plan 2. Valuing Employees: Policy Statement 3. High Performance Organization: Training, Development 4. Citizen Compliant Tracking System: Development 5. Trash Enclosure Temporary 6. Employee Appreciation Program: Instant Bonus, Dinner 7. Annual Street Paving Program 8. Intergovernmental Outreach: a) Fire- Manhattan Beach b) AES Opposition to Rebuild c) Hernando Street/Bikeway d) Caltrans 9. Development Services Process Map 10. Land and Asset Management Software: Permitting Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 12 GOAL 4 MORE LIVABLE, SUSTAINABLE BEACH CITY ACHIEVEMENTS 2014 – 2015 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1. Municipal Carbon Neutral Action Plan: Lancaster Tour – “Best Practices” 2. South Park Improvements: Phase I 3. Community Dialog and Tool 4. Sewer Replacement Program 5. General Plan – Blue Print for a Low Carbon Future 6. Local Coastal Plan: Development Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 13 OTHER CITY ACHIEVEMENTS 2014 – 2015 ★ ★ ★ ★ 1. Low Impact Development Ordinance 2. Charging Stations: Parking Structure 3. City Energy Efficiency Report 4. Water Conservation: Community Outreach 5. Green Streets Policy 6. Schools Strategy: Administrative Offices to City, Before/After School Programs 7. South Bay COG: Climate Action Plan Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 14 GOAL 5 ENHANCED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THROUGH REVITALIZED DOWNTOWN AND ENTRY CORRIDORS ACHIEVEMENTS 2014 – 2015 ★ ★ ★ 1. Hotel Developments a. The Clash (30 Units): Moving Forward, More Collaboration with Development b. The Stand and Pier: Community Meeting, Revising Design c. 11th Street/Strand (100+) 2. Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy: Council Acceptance 3. Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation Corridor: Working Relationship with Caltrans, Project on “Radar” Screen, Verbal Commitment Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 15 OTHER CITY ACHIEVEMENTS 2014 – 2015 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1. Economic Development Position 2. City Manager’s Economic Development Committee: Creation 3. Use Guide for Doing Business in Hermosa Beach 4. Economic Development Welcome Team 5. Petition to Sale L.A. Air Base: Staying Open 6. Skechers Development: Moving Forward Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 16 Hermosa Beach 2015 1. Business: Support Collaboration with City Development and Permitting Process 2. More Information to Community: Website Upgrade PIO 3. Strong Community Events: Less Impact More Family Friendly 4. More Quality Restaurants: Healthy Choice More Lunch Traffic 5. Low Business Vacancy 6. More Connections to Neighbors: Manhattan Beach Redondo Beach 7. Safe Community – Crime Down 8. More People During Day: Pedestrian Traffic Shoppers 9. Better Quality Streets Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 17 DEPARTMENTAL SUCCESSES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2014 – 2015 Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 18 DEPARTMENTAL SUCCESSES 2014 Hermosa Beach, California March 2015 DEPARTMENT: City Manager Please list your department’s most important achievements that were completed during 2013 under “Success.” Under “Impacts”, please explain what the benefits to the city and to a resident were as a result of each achievement. Success: Completed Oil Ballot Measure Impacts: Success: Hired New Public Works Director Impacts: Leadership for Public Works Success: Completed Public Safety Service and Staffing Study Impacts: Success: Completed design and began construction on South Park Impacts: Success: Completed Project Study Report (PSR) with CalTrans for PCH – Funded by COG Impacts: Success: Provided High Performance Organization Training for City Staff Impacts: Engaged Staff in Training to Shift Culture to Achieve High Performance Success: Continued 360 Degree Performance Review for City Manager Impacts: Allowed for Top Down and Down Up Review of Leadership Leading to Higher Engagement Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 19 Success: Served on Budget Committee/South Bay COG Impacts: Success: Oversaw another effective Fourth of July campaign to reduce holiday impact Impacts: Addressed Issues with Fourth of July Holiday Impacts Success: Created more space for Schools by moving School Administrative offices to South Park Impacts: Success: Developed 5 year CIP Master Plan Impacts: Success: Funding for City Manager’s Department Management Analyst Positions Impacts: Budgeted, Filled, Temporary to Full-time Status: Environmental Services Coordinator and Management Analyst Success: Pilot Parking Program – Testing of Flexible Pricing Models & Meter Technology Trial Impacts: Tested Viability of Demand Pricing on City Parking Meters and Gathered Input Regarding Industry-leading Versions of Single-space Parking Meters/Sensors Success: Approval of PHASE 1 Parking Infrastructure Expansion – Citywide Curbside Smart Meter Upgrades Impacts: New Single-Space, Credit-Card Parking Meters Along Commercial Corridors Success: Public Information Officer Selection Impacts: Centralized, Comprehensive Public Relations Services Success: ‘SpeakUpHermosa!’ – Hermosa Beach Community Engagement Portal Impacts: Created On-line Portal for Community Engagement and Citywide Communications Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 20 Success: Holiday Parking Program Impacts: Collaborative, Formalized Marketing Plan w/ Chamber of Commerce. Holiday Bagging. Success: On-line Service Request Filing Impacts: Expanded Options on City Website for Service Request Filings by the Public Success: League of California Cities – Worksite Wellness Grant Recipient Impacts: Competitive Grant Centered on Funding Worksite Wellness/Health Initiatives Success: Accela Purchase – Land & Asset Management Software Impacts: Land & Asset Management Software for City Departments Success: City Monthly E-Newsletter Impacts: Formalized Monthly E-Newsletter In-House Success: Civic Issue Tracking Impacts: Expanded Departmental Civic Issue Tracking Efforts via Landport Software Success: Departmental Performance Measurement/Benchmarking Impacts: Established Citywide Performance Measures & Benchmarking Standards Using National Data Success: Health and Wellness Grant Committee meetings Impacts: Health and Wellness Success: Components of Downtown Core Strategic Plan were accepted by Council on Feb. 24th Impacts: Beginning to start public input on the various benefits the plan offers Success: Created an Economic Development Position Impacts: Sales tax has increased and customer service has been improved Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 21 Success: Created a User Guide for Doing Business in Hermosa Beach Impacts: Improved customer service and assist new start-ups Success: Skechers Development Impacts: High profile company that matches culture and will improved a blighted site at entryway Success: 148 New business licenses in 2014 Impacts: Sales tax increased by 2 % - façade and tenant improvements in commercial corridors Success: Pier & Strand Hotel Mixed Use– Proposed Development Impacts: Potential to improved blighted beachfront sites and increase TOT and sales tax Success: OTO Hotel Mixed Use Development Impacts: Potential to improve blighted beachfront sites and increase TOT and sales tax Success: Pier/Strand Hotel Mixed Use Development Impacts: Potential to improve blighted beachfront sites and increase TOT and sales tax Success: Partnerships with the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Impacts: Improved Fiesta and much better communications with local businesses Success: Sociable City Plan Development Impacts: Brought together restaurant owners and residents to develop a joint plan to improve the entertainment zone and open a line of communication Success: New Business License and Permit Processing Application & System Impacts: Business friendly system for development services applicants Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 22 Success: City Council adopts the municipal carbon neutral plan and set a goal to achieve carbon neutrality by 2020. Commence implementation of the plan including hiring a consultant to develop a planning and tracking tool and delivering presentations at statewide and local meetings Impacts: Supporting Carbon Neutral/Energy Efficiency Policy Goal and Goals of a more sustainable Beach City Success: Organize and coordinate elected officials, staff and community stakeholders for an Earth Day Tour to the City of Lancaster to learn and share carbon reduction initiatives and establish sister-city relationship Impacts: Supporting Carbon Neutral/Energy Efficiency Policy Goal and Goals of a more sustainable Beach City Success: Update water conservation rules in response to Governor Brown’s Executive Order for Hermosa Beach residents to reduce water use by 20%. Development and distribution outreach and education materials in local news media and on City website, establishment of a draught tolerant-plant demonstration garden at City Hall Impacts: Compliance with state law and supporting Goals of a more sustainable Beach City Success: Manage the solid waste contract, coordinate CalRecycle annual compliance reporting including data compilation, site inspections, participation in regional stakeholder groups Impacts: Supports providing 1st Class Services, compliance with state law, and supporting goals of a more sustainable Beach City Success: Implement the Sustainability Plan including organizing a forum on Community Choice Aggregation, expanding bike parking, expanding employee commute incentives Impacts: Supporting Carbon Neutral/Energy Efficiency Policy Goal and Goals of a more sustainable Beach City Success: Assist with oversight of the NPDES Permit and the City’s storm water management program including participation at EWMP meetings, managing the Clean Bay Restaurant Inspection Program, pursuing funding for stormwater projects Impacts: Supports More Livable City and supports Goals of a more sustainable Beach City Success: Organize and assist with the application, outreach and education for the Wyland National Mayor's Challenge for Water Conservation for which Hermosa won their division Impacts: Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 23 DEPARTMENTAL SUCCESSES 2014 Hermosa Beach, California March 2015 DEPARTMENT: Community Development Please list your department’s most important achievements that were completed during 2014 under “Success.” Under “Impacts”, please explain what the benefits to the city and to a resident were as a result of each achievement. Success: Oil Project preparation for vote - Certification of EIR, Completion of CBA and HIA, public outreach including website updates, media outreach, hosting informational forums Impacts: Public was thoroughly informed and provided opportunities for input and to become well equipped with information to make an informed decision Success: General Plan and Coastal Land Use Plan update – Progress continuing. Vision Statement approved by Council. Continuing funding to support this work provided by Strategic Growth Council Grant (410K) and another Grant received (100K) to integrate Local Coastal Program (LCP) Impacts: Long term visions for land use and transportation and other policies linked to sustainability and carbon reduction will be adopted into General Plan, allowing for their implementation into the future. Integration with LCP will give authority to City to issue Coastal Development Permits improving efficiency and linking to city goals. Success: Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy – Accepted by City Council Impacts: Puts in motion the implementation of public improvements (Hermosa Avenue and Pier Plaza), and establishes the guidelines and pushes forward zoning and parking code changes to encourage complementary private development, intended to improve and revitalize the downtown core. Success: Late Night Action Plan items – Food Alcohol Sales policy codified, Conditional Use Permit Review process improved, standards adopted for managing lines at restaurants, and allowing retail encroachments Impacts: Improves clarity for businesses and improves ability to enforce codes fairly all with the goal improving the compatibility of late night businesses with other commercial uses and nearby residents. Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 24 Success: Enhanced Code Enforcement and Coordination with Police Department Impacts: Additional staffing and regular coordination with Community Service Officers and Police has increased efficiency and compliance reducing impacts of late night establishments on residents and other businesses, as well as improved compliance in other areas such as signage and construction activities. Success: Carbon Neutral Action Plan for Municipal and Community Impacts: Progress on Municipal Plan, and coordination with and transfer of responsibility to Environmental Programs Analyst to accelerate progress. Integration of Community Carbon Neutral Planning into General Plan. Success: Trans-Pacific Fiber Optic Cable Entitlement Process initiated Impacts: Preliminary lease terms negotiated, EIR firm hired and process to entitle project initiated. City to receive significant revenue from lease, while process will ensure project will proceed with minimal impact. Success: Facilitation and Permitting of New Development Activity Sensitive to Character of HB Impacts: Continue to provide excellent service with limited staff that balances economic development with quality of life issues and community engagement in the review process important to local residents. New projects include proposed new hotels, Skecher’s office building/design center, new office and commercial buildings, etc. all in various stages of the entitlement process Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 25 DEPARTMENTAL SUCCESSES 2014 Hermosa Beach, California March 2015 DEPARTMENT: Community Resources Please list your department’s most important achievements that were completed during 2014 under “Success.” Under “Impacts”, please explain what the benefits to the city and to a resident were as a result of each achievement. Success: South Park Design was completed and construction began in April 2015 Impacts: Upon completion, the park will bring more recreational opportunities for the community with a two to five year old play area as well as a six to twelve year old play area, both accessible for children of all abilities. There will also be an enhanced Community Garden area that can be enjoyed by both children and adults. Success: Theatre Improvements: new light board, new sound board, new LED strip fixtures, new wireless microphones, new main speakers, new front fill speakers, and new main curtain with valance and teasers through partnership with the Hermosa Arts Foundation. Impacts: The new technical hardware is more desirable to clients and increases the theatre’s ability for both higher end productions as well as increasing the variety of productions. The LED lights are more energy efficient. Success: Transition from CLASS to Active Network Impacts: Active Network provides a more user-friendly experience for class and camp registration, allowing users to create their own account and register at any time, as well as request facility rentals. Success: New events such as World Cup Viewing Parties, Fin Fest and CrossFit Games during the Summer of 2014. Impacts: The events provided more family friendly/recreational opportunities and allowed for a greater variety of events for the community to enjoy. Success: Expansion of the P.A.R.K. After School Program in March 2014 with the addition of 20 more students. Impacts: Provides after-school care to the residents of Hermosa Beach for 90 children. Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 26 Success: Increased amount of scheduled activities in the Hermosa Five-O Senior Activity Center leading to increased membership. The center now offers activities 7 days a week. Impacts: More recreational activities for the 50plus community to enjoy. Success: Updating Special Event Application to allow for and electronically fillable format. Impacts: Provides more user-friendly approach when completing the application and aligns with the city’s efforts to go green as this allows the application to be completed and submitted without printing. Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 27 DEPARTMENTAL SUCCESSES 2014 Hermosa Beach, California March 2015 DEPARTMENT: Finance Department Please list your department’s most important achievements that were completed during 2014 under “Success.” Under “Impacts”, please explain what the benefits to the city and to a resident were as a result of each achievement. Success: Selection of Financial Advisor, Bond Counsel for Oil Settlement and Sewer Bond Issues Impacts: Best Advice/Least Expense/Facilitation of Bond Issuance Success: Priority Based Budgeting Model Presented to Council Impacts: Alignment of Departmental Programs with Community Priorities, Better Decision making Model for City Council Success: Presentation of Performance Measures Impacts: Quantitative Measurement of Departmental Performance, Benchmarking with Other Cities Success: Update of Financial Policies to Include Street Improvement Pavement Condition Index Goal Impacts: Setting of Goal/Measurement of Progress on Street Improvements Success: Fiscal Health Model Impacts: Improved Presentation of Five Year Forecast, Modeling of Scenarios to Improve Understanding of Financial Issues Success: Procurement Policy Update (thanks to City Manager) Impacts: Higher Limits for Increased Efficiency Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 28 Success: Pilot Parking Meter Project/Demand Parking Rates Impacts: Purchase of Additional Smart Meters Improves Convenience for Public, Improves Efficiency of Collection, Additional Revenue for High Demand Times Success: Implemented Second Cash Register for Cashier Division Impacts: Increased Efficiency for Staff, Less Wait Time for Customers Success: Implemented Remote Deposit for Community Resources/Armored Transport for Cash/Check Deposits (Ceased Service During Economic Downturn) Impacts: Take Advantage of Newer Technology to Improve Efficiency/Free Up Police Personnel for Higher Priority Calls for Service Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 29 DEPARTMENTAL SUCCESSES 2014 Hermosa Beach, California March 2015 DEPARTMENT: Fire Department Please list your department’s most important achievements that were completed during 2014 under “Success.” Under “Impacts”, please explain what the benefits to the city and to a resident were as a result of each achievement. Success: Obtained Council support/funding for Emergency Operations Plan update. Impacts: Allowed search for and selection of consultant. Success: Began renovation/clearing of room adjoining EOC (removed loose items) Impacts: Allows to proceeds to next steps to enlarge EOC area(s) to include communications, break-out meeting rooms and restroom facilities. Success: Facilitated delivery of CPR-AED training for City staff. Impacts: More than half of City staff now has knowledge of a potentially life-saving skill. Success: Designed, purchased and used pop-up banners for public presentations. Impacts: Banners are easily stored and deployed and provide a visual to public audiences and consistent talking points for FD personnel. Success: Completed grant-funded SmartClassroom project in the EOC. Impacts: Course participation of HBFD personnel in regional courses and remain in Hermosa Beach via this technology (regional curriculum still being developed). Success: Launched social media presence on Facebook and Twitter. Impacts: Provides another avenue for the exchange of information with the public. Success: Conducted/hosted a fireground survival course for Area G fire departments. Impacts: Provided opportunity for firefighters to practice self-extrication from entrapments. Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 30 Success: Held a Fire Engineer’s exam. Impacts: Established an acting engineer list. Success: Opticom survey and repairs to certain intersections performed by vendor. Impacts: Some inoperable Opticom intersections were repaired. Success: FD staff constructed Santa’s “sleigh” for the annual Santa Sleigh Ride. Impacts: Visited 10 different neighborhoods over two nights with PD. PW assisted in planning. Success: Hosted Strike Team Leader-Engine training for the South Bay. Impacts: Enabled South Bay Strike Team Leaders to receive required annual training. Success: Developed position of and job description for Emergency Management Coordinator. Impacts: Allowed recruitment process to commence. Success: Participated in National Night Out. Impacts: Fire personnel, along with PD, PW and Lifeguards, visited several neighborhoods to provide presentations and to meet-and-greet. Success: July 4th planning, response and post-event review. Impacts: Improved community safety on July 4th. Success: Collaborated with PD to evaluate school sites for safety issues and made recommendations. Impacts: Aided the schools in Hermosa to be safer in fire protection, escape routes, and intruders/active shooters. Success: Launched ePCR program. Impacts: Allows for improved documentation and data analysis. Further technological improvements will also help reduce staff work with report writing. Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 31 Success: EOC Exercise Impacts: Helped identify additional areas requiring attention and improvement. Success: ICMA Study Impacts: Provided a third-party review of and recommendations for the City’s fire department. Success: New antenna installed on EOC roof (in collaboration with PD). Impacts: Enables improved communication from EOC with fire, police and public works units. Success: Updated Personnel Exchange Agreement with Manhattan Beach. Impacts: Previous agreement included only firefighter/paramedics; new agreement includes the rank of fire captain. Success: Created an Emergency Action Plan template for use by all City departments. Impacts: Facilitated the creation of department and location specific emergency action plans throughout the city. Success: Tri-fold pamphlets developed by FD personnel. Impacts: Provides a public information resource to share at special events, service club meetings, etc. Success: Executed contract for new fire engine. Impacts: Enabled process to proceed to research and design phase by fire engine committee. Success: Executed contract for new rescue ambulance Impacts: Enabled process to proceed to research and design by rescue/ambulance committee. Success: Streamlined fire inspection invoicing. Impacts: Lessoned personnel hours required to process invoicing. Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 32 DEPARTMENTAL SUCCESSES 2014 Hermosa Beach, California March 2015 DEPARTMENT: Police Please list your department’s most important achievements that were completed during 2014 under “Success.” Under “Impacts”, please explain what the benefits to the city and to a resident were as a result of each achievement. Success: Officer Mick Gaglia was awarded with the Distinguished Service Award during the South Bay Medal of Valor Ceremony. Impacts: Positive media coverage of the event and several print articles about Officer Gaglia’s actions that saved the life of one of our residents. Success: Successfully handled two impromptu “Hidden cash” events at our beach. Impacts: Our City was inundated with vehicle traffic and large crowds when the media announced that cash had been hidden in the sand in Hermosa Beach. Our officers quickly managed the crowds and cars, and utilized social media quickly to inform everyone once all of the cash had been found. Success: World Champion Los Angeles Kings Parade along The Strand Impacts: Well-planned and coordinated event working with neighboring public safety agencies ensured the safety of everyone lining the parade route. Success: World Cup Soccer Viewing Parties Impacts: The City hosted two very well attended viewing parties that attracted large crowds to Pier Plaza. Crowds and traffic were both managed well. Success: Uneventful July 4th in Hermosa Beach Impacts: Maximum deployment of HBPD along with 50 LASD deputies throughout the holiday weekend resulted in an enjoyable weekend for everyone at the beach. No problems all weekend. Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 33 Success: Fin Fest Impacts: Shark Week was a well-attended family event that culminated with a free concert on the beach attended by approximately 10,000 people. The crowds and traffic were managed well. Success: Downtown Camera Project Impacts: Council approved the project that no doubt will enhance the safety in and around Pier Plaza. Success: Successfully recruited and hired 5 new police officers Impacts: Three officers have completed their training and are working in the field. Two recruits will graduate the academy in 2015. Once they are assigned to the field, we will be able to assign a dedicated team to the downtown area. Success: Successfully scanned all records/documents dating back to 2009 Impacts: This system will allow easier access to historical files and data. Success: CALEA Reaccreditation (March 2014) Impacts: National recognition acknowledging the HBPD as maintaining high law enforcement performance standards. Success: “Hide It. Lock It. Keep It.” Crime Prevention Campaign Impacts: Developed and rolled out the campaign to encourage residents to harden the target regarding property crimes. Success: HBPD Open House and Bicycle Safety Fair Impacts: Well-attended event by 250-300 residents. Demonstrations included “shoot/don’t shoot” video scenarios, tours of the jail and police station, face painting and bounce house for the children, along with Santa! Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 34 DEPARTMENTAL SUCCESSES 2014 Hermosa Beach, California March 2015 DEPARTMENT: Public Works Please list your department’s most important achievements that were completed during 2014 under “Success.” Under “Impacts”, please explain what the benefits to the city and to a resident were as a result of each achievement. Success: In-Pavement Crosswalk Flashers Replacement. The project was completed ahead of schedule and within budget Impacts: Created a safe environment at 3 crosswalks on Pier Avenue Success: CIP 11-602 Clark Field –Phase I electrical upgrades and CIP 13-649 Community Center’s electrical upgrades and fire alarm system Installation Impacts: Completed the relocation of the main service electrical panel and switches from the old announcers booth and allowed for a simplified system to turn off and on the Clark Field Lights. Success: CIP 13-659 Municipal Pier Structural Repairs – Phase II completed ahead of Schedule and well within budget. Impacts: Completed additional repairs to 13 piles underneath the pier. Success: CIP 12-153 Fire Department Hybrid Beacon Project completed on time and under budget Impacts: Replaced the existing traffic signal light for the fire department with a new traffic signal that allows for remote activation and painted to match the Pier Avenue design of poles and street amenities Success: Completed CIP 10-426, 11-401-, 12-401 Sewer Improvements – Various Improvements in February 2014 Impacts: Met goal of providing more livable, sustainable beach city and top priority of improving the City’s sewer system. Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 35 Success: Completed CIP 11-127 and CIP 12-127 Street Improvements – Various Locations in February 2014. Impacts: The project consisted of performing pavement rehabilitation of a number of streets at various locations throughout the City. The Work performed included grind and overlay of asphalt and concrete pavement, slurry seal, spot repairs, and grade adjustments for drainage correction distributed among 34 streets. Work also included tree removal, sidewalk reconstruction, installation of new infiltration basins, and replacement/adjustment of traffic striping, tree replacement, and street signage. This project met the goal of providing more livable, sustainable beach city and top management priority of meeting street paving program goals. Success: Completed CIP 13-127 Street Improvements – Various Locations in December 2014. Impacts: The project consists of performing pavement rehabilitation of a number of streets at various locations throughout the City. The Work performed included grind and overlay of asphalt and concrete pavement, slurry seal, spot repairs, and improvements for drainage correction distributed among 20 streets. Work also included tree removal, sidewalk reconstruction, installation of new infiltration basins, and replacement/adjustment of traffic striping, tree removals for drainage correction measures, and additional bike road repairs. This project met the goal of providing more livable, sustainable beach city and top management priority of meeting street paving program goals. Success: Completed construction for CIP 13-401 Sewer Improvements – Various Locations Impacts: This project rehabilitated and or reconstructed segments of deteriorated or damaged sewer pipes at various locations. The project included replacing existing sewer manholes as well as the construction of new manholes to allow sewer crew access for routine sewer cleaning and maintenance. The project also included implementing a sewer repair lining system for approximately 4,000 linear feet of our sewer system. The extension of an existing reclaimed water main on Herondo Street to Hermosa Avenue was added to the project. The extension was for approximately 775 feet, plus an additional distance on Hermosa Avenue to connect with the medians the City of Redondo Beach is renovating. Met goal of providing more livable, sustainable beach city and top priority of improving the City’s sewer system. Reducing and ultimately eliminating any future sewer spills is a State mandate and the goal of the City of Hermosa Beach.   Success: Filled City Yard Crew Leader 4 year vacancy Impacts: Productivity and assistance in management Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 36        Success:  Temporarily filled vacant maintenance positions due to promotions and retirements   Impacts:  Sustain productivity     Success: Installed compactor for Lot A including all related utilities and fence. Removed old trash enclosure, paved area and adjusted parking layout. Impacts: Cleaned Lot A appearance, removed problem with foul smell in the Downtown area and increased parking by 4 additional spaces. Related to fulfilling Economic Development goals and more sustainable and livable city. Success: Completed South Park new office construction for the Hermosa Beach School district including constructing a restroom separation in women’s restroom. Impacts: Helped school district with space problem. Met high priority of ‘Schools Stragegy and Specific Actions: Support for Top Quality Schools’. Success: Coordinated hazardous waste, shred day and composting events Impacts: Community values, met goal of more sustainable and livable city. Success: Completed new office construction at Community Service building for new manager, renovated restroom and stairway. Impacts: Facilitated a new position work area which facilitates in the City in providing high performing 1st class services. Success: Ordered and installed new PD generator, relocated and built new enclosure. Impacts: Allows PD to continue to function with power outage and meets goal of ‘Commitment to a Safe Community’. Success: Installed new security lights on Plaza Impacts: Increases safety and meets goal of ‘Commitment to Safe Community’. Success: Upgraded all Plaza Lights to LED Impacts: Reduces energy usage and carbon output and contributes to meeting high priority policy agenda of carbon neutrality. Performance Report 2014 – 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Draft 7/14/15 Project 150636 37 Success: Revised storm drain cleaning contract. Completed bid process for new contract Impacts: Ensures compliance with MS4 clean water permit which meets goal of ‘More Livable, Sustainable Beach City’. Success: Replaced gym scoreboard with new remote wireless scoreboard. Impacts: Providing community and basketball league a wireless scoreboard system and meet goal of ‘More Livable, Sustainable City’. Success: Revised elevator contract and completed bid process for 3 year contract Impacts: Assure safe reliable elevator service and provides for meeting goal of high performing city providing 1st class service. Success: Coordinated emergency sewer repairs at on Oak Street that affected trailer park sewer usage. Coordinated emergency sewer repairs at 9th and Ardmore Ave. Impacts: Allowed residents sanitary convenience and meets goal of providing 1st class services. Success: Installed new doors and hardware at Pier restrooms at the beach. Impacts: Helps provide 1st class services and maintain beach lifestyle. STRATEGIC PLAN 2015 2020 2030 Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Phone: (386) 246-6250 9 Flagship Court Fax: (386) 246-6252 Palm Coast, FL 32137 E-mail Hermosa Beach, California August 2015 Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Phone: (386) 246-6250 9 Flagship Court Fax: (386) 246-6252 Palm Coast, FL 32137 E-mail: sumekassoc@gmail.com Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 Table of Contents Strategic Planning for the City of Hermosa Beach 1 Hermosa Beach Vision 2030 3 Hermosa Beach Municipal Government: Mission 8 City of Hermosa Beach Plan 2015 – 2020 13 City of Hermosa Beach Action Agenda 2015 32 This report and all related materials are copyrighted. This report may be duplicated for distribution to appropriate parties as needed. No unauthorized duplication is allowed, including for use in training within your organization or for consulting purposes outside your organization. All requests for duplication must be submitted in writing. Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 1 STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 2 Strategic Planning Model for the City of Hermosa Beach Value-based principles that describe the preferred future in 15 years VISION Destination “You Have Arrived” Strategic goals that focus outcome-base objectives and potential actions for 5 years PLAN Map “The Right Route” Focus for one year – a work program: policy agenda for Mayor and Council, management agenda for staff; major projects EXECUTION Itinerary “The Right Direction” Principles that define the responsibility of City government and frame the primary services – core service businesses MISSION Vehicle “The Right Bus” Personal values that define performance standards and expectations for employees CORE BELIEFS Fuel “The Right People” Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 3 HERMOSA BEACH VISION 2030 Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 4 Hermosa Beach Vision 2030 HERMOSA BEACH 2030 is The Best Little Beach City! (1) Our Hometown Spirit, (2) Our Beach Life Style, (3) Our Eclectic Downtown, (4) Our Vibrant Entry Corridors (5) Our Leadership in Environmental Sustainability, (6) MAKES US DIFFERENT AND SETS US APART. Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 5 Hermosa Beach Vision 2030 PRINCIPLE 1 THE BEST LITTLE BEACH CITY „ Means 1. Appreciation of diverse, contrasting, relaxed life styles 2. Small, compact city distinct from others 3. Pacific Ocean and our beach serving as the focal point of Hermosa Beach 4. Preservation and celebrating the history, architectural diverse heritage of Hermosa Beach 5. Diverse housing options 6. All feeling welcome in our community 7. Top quality, small hotel(s) and retail for our visitors 8. Place for innovators, champions, and iconoclasts to enjoy life and excel PRINCIPLE 2 HOMETOWN SPIRIT „ Means 1. All generations feel at home and bring energy to our community 2. Neighborhood schools providing top quality, nationally recognized educational programs and support by the community 3. Residents and community base belong to, are engaged in volunteering and contribute to our community 4. Locally owned businesses participate in and contribute to our community 5. Residents feeling and being safe at home and throughout the city 6. Residents knowing and helping their neighbor 7. Small locally owned commercial areas serving the neighborhood and visitors 8. Great place for raising a family Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 6 PRINCIPLE 3 BEACH LIFE STYLE „ Means 1. Casual life style: flip flops, shorts 2. Residents and visitors value our beach 3. Emphasis on outdoor healthy living and activities 4. Clean beach, clean ocean 5. Strong community events and festivals: some for our residents and some drawing visitors 6. Easy, convenient beach access for all 7. Enjoying the ocean, playing volleyball, surfing and athletic activities, walking on our beach 8. The Strand: walk, bike and enjoying the sunset 9. Opportunities to meet people, to socialize with diverse people PRINCIPLE 4 ECLECTIC DOWNTOWN „ Means 1. Unique, locally owned retail shops offering a variety of products 2. Well maintained, artistic, attractive public spaces 3. Downtown as a community focal point and destination – near our beach 4. Pedestrian friendly and walkable area 5. Increased day time commercial population 6. Civic Complex and Pier Plaza are defining anchors for Downtown 7. Locally owned quality dining and entertainment venues Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 7 PRINCIPLE 5 VIBRANT ENTRY CORRIDORS „ Means 1. Well designed commercial centers with viable businesses serving the needs of residents and drawing others to Hermosa Beach 2. Attractive, well maintained entrances, streetscapes and medians that signify that you are in Hermosa Beach 3. Expanded commercial tax base 4. Professional and small business office spaces 5. Positive environment for business investment along the corridors PRINCIPLE 6 LEADERSHIP IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY „ Means 1. Stewardship of natural resources: beach and living environment 2. Use of alternative energy sources within the City 3. Reduced dependence upon the automobile through the use of alternative transportation modes 4. Bike lanes and sidewalks connecting community destinations 5. Water conservation and reuse throughout the city 6. Leading edge achieving in carbon neutrality for the municipality and community Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 8 HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT: MISSION Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 9 Hermosa Beach Municipal Government: Our Mission The mission of the HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT is to Be Financially, (1) Environmentally (2) Responsible to Govern the Community (3) and to Provide 1st Class Municipal Services (4) in a Customer Friendly Manner. (5) through Valued Employees and Volunteers. (6) Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 10 Hermosa Beach Municipal Corporation Our Mission PRINCIPLE 1 BE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE „ Means 1. Delivering city services in the most cost effective and efficient manner 2. Investing in the maintenance and upgrade of City facilities and infrastructure 3. Develop a balanced budget based upon direction and guideline from City Council 4. Maintaining a useful, accurate financial reporting system that allows for appropriate checks and balances 5. Overseeing financial condition and processes 6. Maintaining financial reserves consistent with City policies and national standards 7. Providing residents and businesses service value for their tax dollars and fees PRINCIPLE 2 BE ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBLE „ Means 1. Incorporate environmental sustainability principles in city decisions, budgets, facilities and plans 2. Educate the community on environmental issues and the impacts of their daily decisions on the environment 3. Reduce the carbon footprint and become carbon neutral as a municipal corporation 4. Conserve the use of natural resources: energy and water 5. Plan for resilient responses to the impacts of climate changes 6. Monitor the condition of the environment and evaluating the impacts of City decisions and actions 7. Evaluate the environmental return on City investments and decisions Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 11 PRINCIPLE 3 GOVERN THE COMMUNITY „ Means 1. Develop, adopt laws, policies and plans 2. Determine the vision, mission, goals and plans for the City 3. Maintain a transparent City government and governance process 4. Inform the community in a timely manner 5. Engage the community in the governance process through boards, commissions and committees; public hearings; community meetings 6. Act with civility and respect for each other, City staff, public and others 7. Respect the rule of law 8. Act in a fair and impartial manner acting without favoritism 9. Conduct self in an ethical manner avoiding conflicts of interests and negative perceptions 10. Make decisions that are in the best interests of the community as a whole 11. Seek input from the community prior to making a decision 12. Represent the municipal corporation to others PRINCIPLE 4 PROVIDE 1ST CLASS MUNICIPAL SERVICES „ Means 1. Defining and prioritizing City services and levels of service 2. Listening to and understanding the needs of City residents and businesses 3. Looking for ways to improve service delivery or to increase productivity through innovative process 4. Evaluating the individual performance with accountability for the results 5. Measuring City and department services through performance benchmarks and metrics with accountability 6. Knowing and applying "best practices" to the City Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 12 PRINCIPLE 5 CUSTOMER FRIENDLY MANNER „ Means 1. Looking for ways to say "yes"; when having to say "no", helping the customer to understand 2. Evaluating level of customer satisfaction 3. Smile 4. Listening to and knowing your customer 5. Presenting a positive image for the City PRINCIPLE 6 VALUED EMPLOYEE AND VOLUNTEERS „ Means 1. Maintain compensation policy based upon balancing market, performance and the community’s total cost of government 2. Valuing and recognizing the contribution and performance of volunteers and employees 3. Maintaining a positive work environment that encourages a sense of purpose, autonomy and fun 4. City is a Team 5. Hiring and retaining a top quality City workforce and volunteers 6. Defining individual performance expectations and standards linked to compensation for employees Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 13 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLAN 2015 – 2020 Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 14 City of Hermosa Beach Goals 2020 Commitment to a Safe Community Financially Sound City Government High Performing City Providing 1st Class Services More Livable, Sustainable Beach City Enhanced Economic Development Through Revitalized Downtown and Entry Corridors Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 15 Goal 1 Commitment To A Safe Community OBJECTIVES 1. Provide a timely response to achieve positive outcomes for emergency calls for service 2. Have one of the lowest crime rate: 2% targeted crime rate reduction 3. Enforce consistently City codes, ordinances and CUP’s 4. Have people feeling safe: any place, any time of day 5. Balance community safety with the interests of an active community 6. Work in partnership with residents and businesses to create a “safe community” 7. Strengthen the working relationship between the Police and the community VALUE TO RESIDENTS 1. Safe community for family members: all generations 2. Feeling safe and secure at hotels and in the community 3. Protection of home and property values 4. Safe community events and festivals 5. Timely response to all emergency calls for service Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 16 SHORT TERM CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 1. Having safe 4th of July and major events 2. Late night behaviors and criminal activities 3. Increasing homeless population – pushed out of Los Angeles 4. Residents sharing responsibility for community safety: hide it, lock it, keep it; and disaster preparedness 5. Developing research capacity to use data to shape and refine City deployment and investigative actions 6. Fluctuating seasonal/weekly/calendar sensitive deployment 7. Consistency: City ordinances and City enforcement – actions, resources, “waivers” 8. Working with businesses and residents 9. Connecting with the Hermosa Beach community 10. Community demand for transparency LONG TERM CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 1. Developing innovative programs to create a safe community 2. Interdepartmental cooperation and collaboration among all City departments for community safety programs and issues 3. Environmental and building designs for safety 4. Police use of cameras including guidelines and storage/retrieval 5. Intercity collaboration on public safety services, facilities, programs Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 17 POLICY ACTIONS 2015 PRIORITY 1. Community Policing Action Plan Top Priority 2. Homeless Strategy and Action Plan High Priority 3. Body Cameras MANAGEMENT ACTIONS 2015 PRIORITY 1. Late Night Action Plan Top Priority 2. Public Safety Service and Staffing Study High Priority 3. Construction Fences – Appearance and Personal Injury MANAGEMENT IN PROGRESS 2015 1. Nixie Communications Plan for Internal and External Use 2. Community Risk Assessment: Mapping; Risk Analysis 3. Downtown Police Unit: Full Time Officer 4. Community Police Academy: 1st Class 5. Emergency Operations Plan: Update and Training 6. Fireground Survival (FGS) Training Program 7. Police Open House 8. Pizza with Police 9. Ambulance Operator Program: Agreement with Manhattan Beach Fire Department 10. Full Time Employee for Ambulance Operator Program 11. Fire Wellness – Fitness Initiative Program 12. Crime Analysis: Refinement 13. Volunteer Police Program: Recruitment 14. Emergency Operations Center: Design, Construction Funding 15. Detective Case Management: Review 16. 1736 House: Direction 17. Neighborhood Watch and VIP Program: Expansion 18. Multi Hazards Mitigation Plan: Development 19. Fire/EMS Standards of Coverage: Funding 20. Police Community Calendar: Development 21. Police Officer Recruitment and Hiring 22. Sex Crimes, Violence, Trafficking Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 18 MAJOR PROJECTS 2015 1. Police Training Facility, including Firing Range 2. Fire Training Tower (CIP 14-632) ON THE HORIZON 2016 – 2020 1. Fire Department Accreditation (2018) 2. Youth Police Program: Development 3. Traffic Calming Plan/Process: Evaluation, Direction on Standards and Criteria, Funding 4. Opticom System for Traffic Control Devices: Direction, Funding 5. Fire Collaboration/Consolidation: Report with Options, Direction 6. Bike Safety Plan: Evaluation, Direction, City Actions (East-West) 7. City/Los Angeles County/South bay COG Task Force on Homeless Populations, Veterans 8. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design: Lighting Plaza/Parking Lots/Laredo Plaza 9. Bikes on Strand – Parking and Speeding: Direction, code Clarification, Resources 10. Commercial Use of Beach Policy/Regulations: Direction, Code Clarification, Resources 11. Code Enforcement Policy: Direction, Level of Enforcement A. Bikes on Strand: Parking and Speeding B. Stealing Recyclables C. Street Peddlers Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 19 Goal 2 Financially Sound City Government OBJECTIVES 1. Partner with others for reduced service costs 2. Invest in City infrastructure and community opportunities 3. Institutionalize priority based budgeting as a decision making tool – aligning resources with community 4. Leverage City resources through outside funding sources, including grants and strategic use debt 5. Leverage strategic environmental initiatives to reduce cost of City services and increase City revenues 6. Achieve “Municipal Carbon Neutral” goal VALUE TO RESIDENTS 1. City acting as responsible steward of the City's resources 2. Value for their tax dollars and fees 3. Keeping Hermosa Beach an affordable place to live 4. City service delivered in an efficient manner 5. City working with others to improve service delivery or expand resources Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 20 SHORT TERM CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 1. Payment of oil liability and informing residents 2. Funding to address aging infrastructure and facility needing maintenance and replacement 3. Costs of long-term employee obligations: pensions, OPEB 4. Developing fees based on users covering the costs of service delivery 5. Valuing, recruiting and retaining quality City employees 6. Leveraging City resources through grants and partnerships 7. Increasing workload and limited organization capacity LONG TERM CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 1. Determining City policy on how to pay for City services 2. Helping residents to understand and appreciate City finances, services and value 3. State of California and their actions impacting or supporting City services and finances, including new prevailing wage law impact on City projects 4. Developing innovative approaches to City service delivery 5. Paying for carbon offsets 6. Staffing and organizational capacity with increasing service demands 7. Increased competition and competing interests for limited grant Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 21 POLICY ACTIONS 2015 PRIORITY 1. Long Term Financial Plan (linked to City Top Priority Infrastructure and Facilities Needs) and Debt Policies 2. Street Program Funding for Catch Up and Top Priority Ongoing Maintenance 3. Compensation Policy and Labor Contracts High Priority 4. Sewer Replacement Program and Fee MANAGEMENT ACTIONS 2015 PRIORITY 1. Priority Based Budgeting High Priority 2. Parking Meters Phase 1 and 2 High Priority 3. User Fee Study (5 years) MANAGEMENT IN PROGRESS 2015 1. Storm Water Plan: Development 2. Eden Systems Purchase Orders for All Departments 3. Oil Settlement: Bond Issuance 4. e Meeting/Paperless Agenda: Boards and Commissions 5. PERS Review Annual Update 6. Online Parking Permits 7. Health Insurance Modifications 8. Priority Based Budgeting Update MANAGEMENT IN PROGRESS 2015 (Continued) 9. Fiscal Health: Live Model 10. Five Year Financial Plan/Fiscal Model: Annual Update 11. Vehicle Replacement: Update Report 12. Sewer Upgrade: Bond Issuance 13. E-payables Implementation 14. New Animal License System 15. Demand Based Pricing Parking: Implementation 16. Theater Rental: Evaluation, Policy Direction 17. Liability Insurance Program for Contract Class Instructors 18. Oil Debt Payment ON THE HORIZON 2016 – 2020 1. Online Convenience Fee: Policy 2. Citywide Document Imaging: Direction, Funding 3. Prohibiting Organizations, Non Profits Using Funds Raised at City Public Properties 4. Grants Opportunities: Assessment, RFP 5. Mayor and City Council Compensation: Study with Options, Direction, Funding 6. National Citizen Survey: Direction, Funding 7. Events Policy and Fees/Waivers: Evaluation, Policy Direction 8. Departmental Cost Reduction Plan: Evaluation, Report with Recommendations, Direction 9. Utility User Tax: Evaluation, Policy Direction 10. City Liability Insurance Limits Policy: Events/Contractors, Evaluation, Direction Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 22 Goal 3 High Performing City Providing 1st Class Services OBJECTIVES 1. Upgrade City facilities 2. Upgrade City infrastructure: streets, sidewalks, sewer collection system 3. Value and maintain a top quality workforce dedicated to serving the Hermosa Beach community 4. Easier access and tracking to City services and service request through technology and improved processes 5. Develop City organization culture that practices “High Performance Organization” principles and accountability 6. Mutual trust and respect among elected officials, management/staff, and community VALUE TO RESIDENTS 1. Service value for tax dollars and fees 2. Convenience through easier access to information and services through the Internet 3. City employees sensitive to the needs and feeling of you as a customer 4. Reliable delivering of City service 5. Timely response to a call for service 6. Consistent response for the City Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 23 SHORT TERM CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 1. Staff capacity and morale vs. increasing demands for services 2. Timing and funding for City facilities improvements 3. Modernizing Public Works Yards, Police/Fire Facilities, City Hall, Civic Center 4. Aging City infrastructure and buildings needing major maintenance and repair 5. Creating a City organization that supports opportunities for employees to excel and grow LONG TERM CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 1. Cost and funding of technology upgrades 2. Employee expectations for salaries and benefits 3. Retaining top quality employees 4. Limited promotional opportunities 5. Effectively, appropriately engaging residents in policy development 6. Communicating and engaging community stakeholders 7. Working with other governmental partners on infrastructure and service delivery 8. Aging City workforce and succession 9. Building trust with the Hermosa Beach community Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 24 POLICY ACTIONS 2015 PRIORITY 1. Comprehensive City Facilities Plan High Priority 2. Corporate Communications Plan 3. City Yard MANAGEMENT ACTIONS 2015 PRIORITY 1. Fire/Police Temporary Location Top Priority MANAGEMENT IN PROGRESS 2015 1. Street Paving Program: Update Report 2. CNG Fueling Options Report 3. City Yard Renovation/Toxic Concern Mitigation 4. Sewer Hydro Jetting Contract 5. Council Cameras 6. Solid Waste Collection: Update Report 7. Employee Appreciation Program: Enhancements 8. High Performance Organization: Developments, Improvements 9. Land and Asset Management Software 10. New Training System for Part-Time Employees 11. Part-Time Employee Recognition MAJOR PROJECTS 2015 1. Street Improvements (CIP 14-128) Projects 2. Street Sharrows (CIP 14-168) ON THE HORIZON 2016 – 2020 1. Succession Planning and Process 2. Code of Ethics: Development 3. Training for Council Candidates: Development 4. Trash Enclosures: Long Term Direction 5. Parking at City Hall: Evaluation, Direction, Funding 6. Parks Management Plan (including Watering) 7. Community Decision Making Tool: Use in Decision Making and Policy Development 8. National Citizen Survey: Direction, Funding 9. Senior Center Board: Evaluation, Direction Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 25 Goal 4 More Livable, Sustainable Beach City OBJECTIVES 1. Enhance creative ways for the City to support school and build community understanding of school finance needs 2. Preserve and enhance small town, neighborhood character 3. Upgrade outdoor recreation facilities and activities 4. Calmer, safer late night Downtown 5. Improve access and mobility for pedestrians, bicycles and other forms of transportation 6. Adaptive, resilient community to sea level rise VALUE TO RESIDENTS 1. More reasons to live in Hermosa Beach 2. Feeling and being safe anywhere, any time of day 3. Protection of property and home values 4. Green City acting as a responsible environmental steward 5. Choices of quality homes for ownership or rental 6. More opportunities for leisure activities close to home Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 26 SHORT TERM CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 1. Increasing public transportation options and utilization 2. City resources limitation 3. Growing senior and ADA population with growing service needs and expectations 4. Effectively handling problems associated with late night life 5. Traffic volume and flow, and street capacity especially around school sites 6. Impact of climate change, including sea level rise LONG TERM CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 1. Defining "carbon neutral" and the responsibilities of the City, businesses and residents 2. Loss of historically significant buildings 3. Green initiative to produce energy and increase energy efficiently 4. Developing potential partnerships 5. Using the Community Decision Tool in policy development and decision making 6. Competing priorities for attention and funding 7. Resistance to change in the community and among residents 8. Changing recreational patterns among different family generations Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 27 POLICY ACTIONS 2015 PRIORITY 1. Before/After School Program High Priority 2. Water: Policy Direction High Priority 3. South Park Phase 2 High Priority 4. Citywide Identity on Streets, Gateways and Signs MANAGEMENT ACTIONS 2015 PRIORITY 1. 8th Street Sidewalk Top Priority 2. General Plan/Local Coastal Program – Top Priority Blueprint for a Low Carbon Future 3. Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan: Top Priority Implementation 4. Library Plan High Priority 5. Community Theater High Priority MANAGEMENT IN PROGRESS 2015 1. AES Rebuild Intervener Site Reuse 2. Special Olympics: Direction 3. 4th of July Regular Holiday Weekend MAJOR PROJECTS 2015 1. Citywide Conservation Upgrades (LED Lights) (CIP 13- 656) 2. South Park Project Phase I 3. Valley Park Playground Resurface/Renovation 4. Surf Legends Memorial Project (CIP 12-661) 5. Protective Bollards on Strand (CIP 14-163) 6. Clark Field and Lawn Bowling Electrical Design and ADA Access (CIP 14-541) 7. Outdoor Kiosks A. Beach B. South Park C. Valley Park Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 28 ON THE HORIZON 2016 – 2020 1. Bike Sharing: Direction 2. Local Public Transit System for Residents, Events and School 3. Gould Avenue Street Improvements: Funding 4. School Site Traffic Study: Direction 5. Community Choice Aggregation 6. Municipal Solar Project (Demonstration) 7. Bike Path Master Plan/Improvements: Project Priority, Funding 8. Family Friendly Community – Beach, Parks and Events: Evaluation, Goals/Desired Outcomes, Direction, City Actions, Funding 9. Community Events Policy and Management: Inventory, Guidelines, City Coordination, Direction, Action Plan 10. Electric Vehicle Car Pool/Employee Commute Incentives: Direction 11. Parks Master Plan: Update 12. Public Transportation Community Dialog: Process Design, Community Involvement, Direction, Funding (including Shuttles, Buses, Taxi, etc.) 13. Historic Preservation: Evaluation, goals/Desired Outcomes, Policy Direction, City Actions 14. Short Term Rental: Problem Analysis, Goals/Desired Outcomes, Policy Direction, City Regulations, Enforcement Mechanism 15. The Strand: 10th and 14th Upgrade: Concrete/Stamped Concrete, Evaluation, Direction 16. 11th Street/Lot “A”: Guidelines, Negotiation with Developer 17. Community Decision Making Tool: Degree of Use, Community Involvement 18. City Electric Vehicle Fleet Policy: Direction, Funding 19. Single Use Bag Policy: Direction 20. Free Parking for Electric Vehicles: Permanent Evaluation, Direction 21. Community Solar Energy: Evaluation, Funding 22. Green Business and Job Development: Goals/ Desired Outcomes, Policy Direction, City Role, City Actions 23. Comprehensive Beach Use Policy: Evaluation, Report with Options, Direction Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 29 Goal 5 Enhanced Economic Development Through Revitalized Downtown And Entry Corridors OBJECTIVES 1. Increase day time “foot traffic” in Downtown 2. Provide flexible parking that support economic development goal and projects 3. More attractive Pacific Coast Highway and Aviation corridors with more quality businesses 4. Attract new businesses including entertainment/film industry to do business in Hermosa Beach during off season (September – May) 5. Stimulate economic development opportunities on vacant and under utilized property 6. Increase green/high technology businesses in Hermosa Beach VALUE TO RESIDENTS 1. Protection/enhancement of property values 2. Private sector investing in upgrading Hermosa Beach 3. More quality restaurant and retail choices within the City 4. Attractive community that you call home 5. Alternative housing choices beyond single family homes 6. More reasons to go enjoy a revitalized Downtown Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 30 SHORT TERM CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 1. Convenient, safe, easy to use and adequate supply parking 2. Funding for redeveloping Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation corridors 3. Unattractive Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation corridors – gateway to Hermosa Beach 4. Paring requirements and enforcement mechanism 5. Defining the City's role in economic growth and community redevelopment 6. City working with all Hermosa Beach businesses LONG TERM CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 1. Working with Coastal Commission 2. Working with property owners and businesses 3. Competition from neighboring cities: hotel, retail, restaurants, and entertainment 4. Few funding options for redevelopment – EIFD 5. Increasing business investment during the economic recovery Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 31 POLICY ACTIONS 2015 PRIORITY 1. Downtown Revitalization Strategy Top Priority 2. Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation Avenue Top Priority Mobility/Improvement Project 3. Hotel Development Top Priority 4. Parking Meters Phase III – Remaining Coin Street Meter Upgrades – Yellow Posted MANAGEMENT ACTIONS 2015 PRIORITY 1. Trans Pacific Fiber Optic Cable High Priority 2. Skecher Development MANAGEMENT IN PROGRESS 2015 1. Parking Phase 1: Commercial Zone Smart Parking Purchase 2. Development Process – One Stop Shop: Development 3. Citywide Filming Strategy 4. Parking Phase 2: Multi Space Meter Pay Station MAJOR PROJECTS 2015 1. String Lights on Pier Plaza 2. Signage at Parking Structure 3. Plaza Granite Cubes and Tile Removal ON THE HORIZON 2015 – 2020 1. Tourism Business Improvement District (BID) 2. Hope Chapel Development 3. Business Retention/Growth Visitation Program 4. Family Friendly Entertainment and Business Opportunities: Policy 5. Parking Phase 3: Citywide Smart Parking Meters 6. Retail and Restaurant Development Strategy Zoning Changes 7. Cypress Avenue District: Zoning Direction 8. Family Friendly Downtown Plan: Goals/Desired Outcomes, Direction, City Actions 9. Parking for Bikes: Problem Analysis, Goals/Desired Outcomes, Direction, City Actions, No Parking on the Strand, Prohibition on Poles and Fences 10. Economic Investment Opportunities Related to Carbon Neutral Strategy: Funding 11. Signage Policy and Enforcement: Direction 12. City Economic Development: Performance Audit, Report with Options, Policy Direction, Tool Kit, Funding Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 32 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ACTION AGENDA 2015 Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 33 City of Hermosa Beach Policy Agenda 2015 TOP PRIORITY Long Term Financial Plan (linked to City Infrastructure and Facilities Needs) and Debt Policies   Downtown Revitalization Strategy   Community Policing Action Plan   Street Program Funding for Catch Up and Ongoing Maintenance   Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation Avenue Mobility/Improvement Project   Hotel Development HIGH PRIORITY Before/After School Program   Water: Policy Direction   Compensation Policy and Labor Contracts   South Park Phase 2   Comprehensive City Facilities Plan   Homeless Strategy and Action Plan Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 34 City of Hermosa Beach Management Agenda 2015 TOP PRIORITY Fire/Police Temporary Location   8th Street Sidewalk   General Plan/Local Coastal Program – Blueprint for a Low Carbon Future   Late Night Action Plan   Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan HIGH PRIORITY Priority Based Budgeting   Library Plan   Community Theater   Parking Meters Phase 1 and 2   Trans Pacific Fiber Optic Cable   Public Safety Service and Staffing Study Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 35 City of Hermosa Beach Management in Progress 2015 Nixie Communications Plan for Internal and External Use  Community Risk Assessment: Mapping; Risk Analysis  Downtown Police Unit: Full Time Officer  Community Police Academy: 1st Class  Emergency Operations Plan: Update and Training   Fireground Survival (FGS) Training Program   Police Open House  Pizza with Police  Ambulance Operator Program: Agreement with Manhattan Beach Fire Department  Full Time Employee for Ambulance Operator Program  Fire Wellness – Fitness Initiative Program   Crime Analysis: Refinement   Volunteer Police Program: Recruitment  Emergency Operations Center: Design, Construction Funding  Detective Case Management: Review   1736 House: Direction   Neighborhood Watch and VIP Program: Expansion Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 36 Multi Hazards Mitigation Plan: Development  Fire/EMS Standards of Coverage: Funding   Police Community Calendar: Development   Police Officer Recruitment and Hiring  Sex Crimes, Violence, Trafficking  Storm Water Plan: Development  Eden Systems Purchase Orders for All Departments  Oil Settlement: Bond Issuance   e Meeting/Paperless Agenda: Boards and Commissions   OPEB Analysis/PERS Review Annual Update  Online Parking Permits  Health Insurance Modifications  Priority Based Budgeting Update  Fiscal Health: Live Model   Five Year Financial Plan/Fiscal Model: Annual Update   Vehicle Replacement: Update Report  Sewer Upgrade: Bond Issuance  E-payables Implementation  New Animal License System   Demand Based Pricing Parking: Implementation  Theater Rental: Evaluation, Policy Direction  Liability Insurance Program for Contract Class Instructors  Oil Debt Payment Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 37 Street Paving Program: Update Report  CNG Fueling Options Report   City Yard Renovation/Toxic Concern Mitigation   Sewer Hydro Jetting Contract  Council Cameras  Solid Waste Collection: Update Report  Employee Appreciation Program: Enhancements  Land and Asset Management Software   New Training System for Part-Time Employees   Part-Time Employee Recognition  AES Rebuild Intervener Site Reuse  Special Olympics: Direction  4th of July Regular Holiday Weekend  Parking Phase 1: Commercial Zone Smart Parking Purchase   Development Process – One Stop Shop: Development   Citywide Filming Strategy  Parking Phase 2: Multi Space Meter Pay Station Strategic Plan: 2015 – 2020 – 2030/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150806 38 City of Hermosa Beach Major Projects 2015 Police Training Facility, including Firing Range  Fire Training Tower (CIP 14-632)   Street Improvements (CIP 14-128) Projects   Street Sharrows (CIP 14-168)   Citywide Conservation Upgrades (LED Lights) (CIP 13-656)  South Park Project Phase I  Valley Park Playground Resurface/Renovation  Surf Legends Memorial Project (CIP 12-661)  Protective Bollards on Strand (CIP 14-163)  Clark Field and Lawn Bowling Electrical Design and ADA Access (CIP 14-541)   Outdoor Kiosks: Beach, South Park, Valley Park   String Lights on Pier Plaza  Signage at Parking Structure   Plaza Granite Cubes and Tile Removal Action Agenda 2015 Mayor and City Council Mayor, Town Council and Town Manager Hermosa Beach, California August 2015 Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Phone: (386) 246-6250 9 Flagship Court Fax: (386) 246-6252 Palm Coast, FL 32137-3373 E-mail: sumekassoc@gmail.com Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 1 Hermosa Beach Vision 2030 HERMOSA BEACH 2030 is The Best Little Beach City! Our Hometown Spirit, Our Beach Life Style, Our Eclectic Downtown, Our Vibrant Entry Corridors Our Commitment to Environmental Sustainability, MAKES US DIFFERENT AND SETS US APART. Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 2 City of Hermosa Beach Policy Agenda 2015 Targets for Action TOP PRIORITY Long Term Financial Plan (linked to City Infrastructure and Facilities Needs) and Debt Policies Downtown Revitalization Strategy Community Policing Action Plan Street Program Funding for Catch Up and Ongoing Maintenance Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation Avenue Mobility/Improvement Project Hotel Development HIGH PRIORITY Before/After School Program Water: Policy Direction Compensation Policy and Labor Contracts South Park Phase 2 Comprehensive City Facilities Plan Homeless Strategy and Action Plan Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 3 City of Hermosa Beach Management Agenda 2015 Targets for Action TOP PRIORITY Fire/Police Temporary Location 8th Street Sidewalk General Plan/Local Coastal Program – Blueprint for a Low Carbon Future Late Night Action Plan Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan HIGH PRIORITY Priority Based Budgeting Library Plan Community Theater Parking Meters Phases 1, 2, and 3 Trans Pacific Fiber Optic Cable Public Safety Service and Staffing Study Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 4 City of Hermosa Beach Management in Progress 2015 1. Nixle Communications Plan for Internal and External Use 2. Community Risk Assessment: Mapping; Risk Analysis 3. Downtown Police Unit: Full Time Officer 4. Community Police Academy: 1st Class 5. Emergency Operations Plan: Update and Training 6. Fireground Survival (FGS) Training Program 7. Police Open House 8. Pizza with Police 9. Ambulance Operator Program: Agreement with Manhattan Beach Fire Department 10. Full Time Employee for Ambulance Operator Program 11. Fire Wellness – Fitness Initiative Program 12. Crime Analysis: Refinement 13. Volunteer Police Program: Recruitment 14. Emergency Operations Center: Design, Construction Funding 15. Detective Case Management: Review 16. 1736 House: Direction 17. Neighborhood Watch and VIP Program: Expansion 18. Multi Hazards Mitigation Plan: Development 19. Fire/EMS Standards of Coverage: Funding 20. Police Community Calendar: Development 21. Police Officer Recruitment and Hiring 22. Sex Crimes, Violence, Trafficking 23. Storm Water Plan: Development 24. Eden Systems Purchase Orders for All Departments 25. Oil Settlement: Bond Issuance 26. e Meeting/Paperless Agenda: Boards and Commissions Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 5 27. OPEB Analysis/PERS Review Annual Update 28. Online Parking Permits 29. Health Insurance Modifications 30. Priority Based Budgeting Update 31. Fiscal Health: Live Model 32. Five Year Financial Plan/Fiscal Model: Annual Update 33. Vehicle Replacement: Update Report 34. Sewer Upgrade: Bond Issuance 35. E-payables Implementation 36. New Animal License System 37. Demand-Based Rate Parking: Implementation 38. Theater Rental: Evaluation, Policy Direction 39. Liability Insurance Program for Contract Class Instructors 40. Oil Debt Payment 41. Street Paving Program: Update Report 42. CNG Fueling Options Report 43. City Yard Renovation/Toxic Concern Mitigation 44. Sewer Hydro Jetting Contract 45. Council Chamber Cameras 46. Solid Waste Collection: Update Report 47. Employee Appreciation Program: Enhancements 48. Land and Asset Management Software 49. New Training System for Part-Time Employees 50. Part-Time Employee Recognition 51. AES Rebuild Intervener Site Reuse 52. Special Olympics: Direction 53. 4th of July Regular Holiday Weekend 54. Parking Upgrades Phase 1: Commercial Zone Smart Parking Meter Purchase 55. Development Process – One Stop Shop: Development 56. Citywide Filming Strategy 57. Parking Upgrades Phase 2: Multi Space Meter Pay Stations Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 6 City of Hermosa Beach Major Projects 2015 1. Police Training Facility, including Firing Range 2. Fire Training Tower (CIP 14-632) 3. Street Improvements (CIP 14-128) Projects 4. Street Sharrows (CIP 14-168) 5. Citywide Conservation Upgrades (LED Lights) (CIP 13-656) 6. South Park Project Phase I 7. Valley Park Playground Resurface/Renovation 8. Surf Legends Memorial Project (CIP 12-661) 9. Protective Bollards on Strand (CIP 14-163) 10. Clark Field and Lawn Bowling Electrical Design and ADA Access (CIP 14-541) 11. Outdoor Kiosks A. Beach B. South Park C. Valley Park 12. String Lights on Pier Plaza 13. Signage at Parking Structure 14. Plaza Granite Cubes and Tile Removal Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 7 City of Hermosa Beach Action Outlines 2015 Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 8 GOAL 1 COMMITMENT TO A SAFE COMMUNITY ACTION: COMMUNITY POLICING ACTION PLAN PRIORITY Policy – Top Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Meeting with Neighborhood Watch Captains 2. Initiate Foot Patrol 3. Establish Community Outreach Calendar Completed Completed Completed 9/15 10/15 Ongoing 8/15 9/15  Community Police Academy  Police Open House  “Coffee with a Cop” 4. Create Police – Community Advisory Board 5. First Board Meeting – monthly meeting Responsibility: Police Chief ACTION: HOMELESS STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN PRIORITY Policy – High Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time  City Role  Goals/Outcomes  Actions  “Best Practice”  Safe 1. Complete Homeless Count 2. Council Study Session/Update: Discussion, Goals/Outcomes 3. Town Hall: Issues and Information 4. Participate in regional efforts  Homes  Social Services  Mental Health Completed 9/15 2/16 Ongoing Responsibility: City Manager/Police Chief Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 9 ACTION: BODY CAMERAS PRIORITY Policy Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time  Storage  Policies  Type 1. Complete field test of body cameras 2. Identify and apply funding sources 3. Council Decision: Funding 4. Develop policy guidelines/storage retention 5. Complete RFP 6. Complete Police Officer Training 7. Implement Program Completed 8/15 – 12/15 TBD – 1/16 3/16 6/16 6/16 6/16 Responsibility: Police Chief ACTION: LATE NIGHT ACTION PLAN PRIORITY Mgmt – Top Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time  Code Enforcement  Downtown Enforcement 1. Implement Reports Ongoing Responsibility: Police Chief ACTION: PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICE AND STAFFING PRIORITY STUDY Mgmt – High Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Explore options with Manhattan Beach – Performance Standard 2. Complete report 3. Council Briefing 4. Meeting with Fire Personnel 9/15 9/15 10/15 Ongoing Responsibility: Fire Chief Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 10 ACTION: CONSTRUCTION FENCES – APPEARANCE PRIORITY AND PERSONAL INJURY Mgmt Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time  Aesthetics  Safety 1. Continue enforcement of construction fence 2. Monitor City projects Ongoing Ongoing Responsibility: Public Works  Management in Progress 2015 TIME 1. Nixle Communications Plan for Internal and External Use 6/15 2. Community Risk Assessment: Mapping; Risk Analysis 7/15 3. Downtown Police Unit: Full Time Officer 9/15 4. Community Police Academy: 1st Class 9/15 5. Emergency Operations Plan: Update and Training 10/15 6. Fireground Survival (FGS) Training Program 10/15 7. Police Open House 10/15 8. Pizza with Police 11/15 9. Ambulance Operator Program: Agreement with Manhattan Beach Fire Department 12/15 10. Full Time Employee for Ambulance Operator Program 12/15 11. Fire Wellness – Fitness Initiative Program 12/15 12. Crime Analysis: Refinement 12/15 13. Volunteer Police Program: Recruitment 1/16 14. Emergency Operations Center: Design, Construction Funding 1/16 15. Detective Case Management: Review 1/16 16. 1736 House: Direction 1/16 17. Neighborhood Watch and VIP Program: Expansion 2/16 18. Multi Hazards Mitigation Plan: Development 4/16 19. Fire/EMS Standards of Coverage: Funding 6/17 20. Police Community Calendar: Development 21. Police Officer Recruitment and Hiring Ongoing 22. Sex Crimes, Violence, Trafficking Ongoing Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 11  Major Projects 2015 1. Police Training Facility, including Firing Range 2. Fire Training Tower (CIP 14-632) Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 12 GOAL 2 FINANCIALLY SOUND CITY GOVERNMENT ACTION: LONG TERM FINANCIAL PLAN (LINKED TO PRIORITY CITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Policy – Top NEEDS) AND DEBT POLICIES Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Complete City Infrastructure and Facilities Plans 2. Integrate plan, 5 yr. CIP and Fiscal Model 3. Council Midyear Budget 9/15 2/16 2/16 Responsibility: Finance ACTION: STREET PROGRAM FUNDING FOR CATCH UP PRIORITY AND ONGOING MAINTENANCE Policy – Top Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Review PCI: Goal “81” Rating 2. Prepare report with options and recommendations 3. Council Mid Year Budget: Direction and Funding 4/16 4/16 4/16 Responsibility: Public Works ACTION: COMPENSATION POLICY AND LABOR PRIORITY CONTRACTS Policy – High Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time  Policy Direction  Salary Percentile 1. Complete negotiations 2. Negotiate contracts (7) 3. Council Decision: Contract Completed 10/15 10/15 Responsibility: Human Resources Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 13 ACTION: SEWER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM AND FEE PRIORITY Policy Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Council Decision: Fee 2. Develop implementation plan with projects (7 years) 3. Council Presentation: Overview 4. Secure bonds – funding Completed 4/16 4/16 5/16 Responsibility: Public Works ACTION: PRIORITY BASED BUDGETING PRIORITY Mgmt – High Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Initial Phase – Fiscal Health, Alignment Service – Revenue 2. Update/revise model (Resource Diagnostic Tool) 3. Council: Use Priority Based Budget Process Completed 2/16 5/16 Responsibility: City Manager ACTION: PARKING METERS PHASE 1 AND 2 PRIORITY Mgmt – High Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Pilot Parking Program 2. Phase 1: Commercial Zone (silver post) Street Meter Purchase/Install 3. Council Decision: Phase 2 – Multi Space Meters, Mobile Pay Technology 4. Council Decision: Long Term Free/Reduced Parking Completed Completed 9/15 10/15 10/15 Responsibility: Police Chief Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 14 ACTION: USER FEE STUDY (5 YEARS) PRIORITY Mgmt Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Hire consultant 2. Complete Study 3. Council Presentation: Study 4. Council Decision: Fee Adjustments 9/15 2/16 4/16 4/16 Responsibility: Finance  Management in Progress 2015 TIME 1. Storm Water Plan: Development 6/15 2. Eden Systems Purchase Orders for All Departments 10/15 3. Oil Settlement: Bond Issuance 8/15 4. e Meeting/Paperless Agenda: Boards and Commissions 9/15 5. PERS Review Annual Update 12/15 6. Online Parking Permits 1/16 7. Health Insurance Modifications 1/16 8. Priority Based Budgeting Update 2/16 9. Fiscal Health: Live Model 2/16 10. Five Year Financial Plan/Fiscal Model: Annual Update 4/16 11. Vehicle Replacement: Update Report 4/16 12. Sewer Upgrade: Bond Issuance 4/16 13. E-payables Implementation 6/16 14. New Animal License System 6/16 15. Demand-Based Rate Parking: Implementation 16. Theater Rental: Evaluation, Policy Direction 17. Liability Insurance Program for Contract Class Instructors 18. Oil Debt Payment Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 15 GOAL 3 HIGH PERFORMING CITY PROVIDING 1st CLASS SERVICES ACTION: COMPREHENSIVE CITY FACILITIES PLAN PRIORITY Policy – High Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Complete Comprehensive City Facilities Plan 2. Council Presentation: Plan, Direction 9/15 12/15 Responsibility: Public Works ACTION: CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS PLAN PRIORITY Policy Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time  Noticing Community 1. Council Decision: Plan 2. Assess plan 3. Council Review: Plan, Action Completed 10/15 10/15 Responsibility: City Manager/Public Information Officer ACTION: CITY YARD PRIORITY Policy Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Assess current plan for City yard 2. Hire consultant for facility assessment option and site location 3. Complete Assessment Report Ongoing 3/16 9/16 Responsibility: Public Works Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 16 ACTION: FIRE/POLICE TEMPORARY LOCATION PRIORITY Mgmt – Top Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Complete Plans and Specifications for Demolition of Fire Tower 2. Complete Police – Fire Structural Assessment 3. Council Decision: Contract 4. Staff Relocation 5. Complete Demolition 9/15 9/15 10/15 11/15 2/16 Responsibility: Public Works  Management in Progress 2015 TIME 1. Street Paving Program: Update Report 4/16 2. CNG Fueling Options Report 10/15 3. City Yard Renovation/Toxic Concern Mitigation 11/15 4. Sewer Hydro Jetting Contract 3/16 5. Council Chamber Cameras 4/16 6. Solid Waste Collection: Update Report 4/17 7. Employee Appreciation Program: Enhancements Ongoing 8. High Performance Organization: Developments, Improvements Ongoing 9. Land and Asset Management Software System Implementation Ongoing 10. New Training System for Part-Time Employees 11. Part-Time Employee Recognition  Major Projects 2015 TIME 1. Street Improvements (CIP 14-128) Projects 10/15 2. Street Sharrows (CIP 14-168) 10/15 Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 17 GOAL 4 MORE LIVABLE, SUSTAINABLE BEACH CITY ACTION: BEFORE/AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM PRIORITY Policy – High Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Implement new partnership 2. Offer Enrichment Program through STAR 3. Assess Community Center Space/Room Availability 4. Council Discussion: Direction 9/15 9/15 2/16 2/16 Responsibility: Recreation ACTION: WATER: POLICY DIRECTION PRIORITY Policy – High Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Implement water conservation program: City irrigation change, reclaimed water on parks 2. Evaluate option of reclaimed water for Downtown, other major commercial developments Ongoing Ongoing Responsibility: City Manager ACTION: SOUTH PARK PHASE 2 PRIORITY Policy – High Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Complete Fund Raising Event 2. Work with Stakeholders on Phase 2: Community Garden 3. Develop preliminary design Ongoing 3/16 3/16 Responsibility: Public Works Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 18 ACTION: CITYWIDE IDENTITY ON STREETS, PRIORITY GATEWAYS AND SIGNS Policy Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Council Update/Direction: Streets, Gateways, Direction 11/15 Responsibility: Public Works ACTION: 8TH STREET SIDEWALK PRIORITY Mgmt – Top Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Complete design 2. Council Presentation/Direction 3. Council Decision: Funding 4. Design 5. Construction 9/15 10/15 2/16 6/16 3/17 Responsibility: Public Works ACTION: GENERAL PLAN/LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM PRIORITY – BLUEPRINT FOR A LOW CARBON Mgmt – Top FUTURE Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Land Use/Transportation 2. Release General Plan/EIR Draft 3. Complete Public Review/Workshops 4. Initiate adoption Completed 11/15 1/16 – 2/16 3/16 Responsibility: Community Development Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 19 ACTION: MUNICIPAL CARBON NEUTRAL PLAN: PRIORITY IMPLEMENTATION Mgmt – Top Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Decision: Community Choice Aggregation Options – Power Purchase Agreement 2. Decision: Solar RFP for Municipal Facilities 3. Develop Employee Commute Reduction Program with Incentives 4. Implement decision making tool – projects and rate of return 11/15 12/15 3/16 Ongoing Responsibility: City Manager ACTION: LIBRARY PLAN PRIORITY Mgmt – High Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Complete feasibility assessment with Los Angeles County 2. Integrate with City Facilities Plan 1/16 2/16 Responsibility: City Manager ACTION: COMMUNITY THEATER PRIORITY Mgmt – High Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Add Film Festival 2. Explore options with theater seats, partnership 3. Council Decision: Funding, Partnership Completed 1/16 2/16 Responsibility: Recreation Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 20  Management in Progress 2015 TIME 1. AES Rebuild Intervener Site Reuse Ongoing 2. Special Olympics: Direction 3. 4th of July Regular Holiday Weekend  Major Projects 2015 TIME 1. Citywide Conservation Upgrades (LED Lights) (CIP 13-656) 7/15 2. South Park Project Phase I 10/15 3. Valley Park Playground Resurface/Renovation 8/15 4. Surf Legends Memorial Project (CIP 12-661) 10/15 5. Protective Bollards on Strand (CIP 14-163) 2/16 6. Clark Field and Lawn Bowling Electrical Design and ADA Access (CIP 14-541) 6/16 7. Outdoor Kiosks A. Beach B. South Park C. Valley Park Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 21 GOAL 5 ENHANCED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THROUGH REVITALIZED DOWNTOWN AND ENTRY CORRIDORS ACTION: DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION STRATEGY PRIORITY Policy – Top Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Planning Commission Decision: Land Use, Zoning, Plan Implementation 2. Complete RFP for Hermosa Avenue Design Improvement/Pier Plaza Conceptual Design 3. Council Decision: Award Design Contract 10/15 10/15 1/16 Responsibility: Community Development/Public Works/ Economic Development ACTION: PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY/AVIATION PRIORITY AVENUE MOBILITY/IMPROVEMENT Policy – Top PROJECT Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Complete Project Study Report (Caltrans) 2. Work with So. Bay COG/Metro (Measure R) on Funding 3. Council Update: Options/Approval 4. Work with stakeholders – initial design 5. Initiate Project Assessment Environment Design 6. Assess funding options/grants for next phase Completed 9/15 10/15 12/15 2/16 Ongoing Responsibility: City Manager/Public Works Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 22 ACTION: HOTEL DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY Policy – Top Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Ongoing coordination with property owners/developers 2. Strand/Pier Hotel Application Expected 3. Strand/Pier Hotel Draft EIR 10/15 3/16 Responsibility: Community Development ACTION: PARKING METERS PHASE III – REMAINING PRIORITY COIN STREET METER UPGRADES – Policy (YELLOW POSTED) Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Council Decision: Purchase 12/15 Responsibility: Police Chief ACTION: TRANS PACIFIC FIBER OPTIC CABLE PRIORITY Mgmt – High Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Draft EIR 2. Council Decision: Project 11/15 2/16 Responsibility: Community Development ACTION: SKECHER DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY Mgmt Key Issues Activities/Milestones Time 1. Draft EIR 2. Council Decision: Project 12/15 3/16 Responsibility: Community Development Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 23  Management in Progress 2015 TIME 1. Development Process – One Stop Shop: Development 2. Citywide Filming Strategy 2/16 3. Parking Phase 2: Multi Space Meter Pay Stations 10/15  Major Projects 2015 TIME 1. String Lights on Pier Plaza 8/15 2. Signage at Parking Structure 8/15 3. Plaza Granite Cubes and Tile Removal 10/15 Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 24 City of Hermosa Beach Policy Calendar Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 25 MONTH September 2015 1. Council Decision: Phase 2 – Multi Space Meters 2. Council Presentation: Comprehensive City Facilities Plan, Direction Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 26 MONTH October 2015 1. Council Decision: Fire/Police Temporary Location Contract 2. Council Decision: Compensation Policy and Labor Contracts 3. Council Decision: Mobile Pay Technology 4. Council Decision: Long Term Free/Reduced Parking 5. Council Presentation/Direction: 8th Street Sidewalk Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 27 MONTH November 2015 Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 28 MONTH December 2015 1. Council Decision: Parking Meters Phase III – Remaining Coin Street Meter Upgrades Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 29 MONTH January 2016 1. Council Decision: Body Cameras, Funding 2. Council Decision: Downtown Revitalization Strategy, Award Design Contract Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 30 MONTH February 2016 1. Council Decision: Fee Adjustments 2. Council Discussion: Before/After School Program, Direction 3. Council Decision: 8th Street Sidewalk, Funding 4. Council Decision: Community Theater, Funding, Partnership 5. Council Decision: Trans Pacific Fiber Optic Cable, Project Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 31 MONTH March 2016 1. Council Decision: Skecher Development, Project Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 32 MONTH April 2016 1. Council Presentation: Sewer Replacement Program & Fee Overview 2. Council Presentation: User Fee Study (5 years) Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 33 MONTH May 2016 Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 34 MONTH June 2016 Action Agenda 2015/Mayor and City Council/Hermosa Beach, California Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150807 35 MONTH July 2016 Mayor and City Council Governance Guiding Principles, Protocols: Operating Guidelines for City Council and City Manager 2015 Mayor and City Council Mayor, Town Council and Town Manager Hermosa Beach, California August 2015 Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Phone: (386) 246-6250 9 Flagship Court Fax: (386) 246-6252 Palm Coast, FL 32137-3373 E-mail: sumekassoc@gmail.com Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150637 1 City of Hermosa Beach Governance  Governance * Republic – elected represent the community * Deliberative Body – working together * Determine policy and make decision – majority decisions * Following the Rules/Process determined by Majority * Respect for the institution, decisions and others Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150637 2 City of Hermosa Beach Mayor and City Council Governance Topics  Topics for Discussion and Direction PRIORITY 1. Roles and Responsibilities, Expectations and Actions: A. Mayor B. Councilmember C. City Manager 3 2. Council Collegiality: Trust, Respect for Difference 3 3. Council Meeting Management 3 4. Study Sessions and Public Hearings: Motions, Staff Direction, Decisions by Majority 3 5. Council Directing Individual Staff 3 6. Placing an Item on Council Agenda: New Topic Definition/Guidelines 2 7. Information to Council: Personnel Action – Discipline, Termination, etc. 2 8. Council Discussion: Come Prepared – Homework Done, Focus on Issue, No Attacks/Accusations 2 9. Council Protocols: A. Information Requests B. Citizen Requests C. Research on Topic D. Agenda Process 2 10. Council Agenda vs. Individual Agenda – Priority, Council Majority Direction 2 11. Representation of City: A. Mayor B. Council C. City Manager 2 12. Minutes for: A. Council Meetings B. Boards/Commission Meetings 1 13. Authority to Contract for Services or Investigations: Who, Amount 1 14. Council Direction/Decision 1 15. City Staff Reports: Complete, Options, Recommendations, Guidelines 1 Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150637 3  Topics for Discussion and Direction (Continued) PRIORITY 16. Functional Mayor – City Council: Definition 1 17. Notification to Public: Meetings, Hearings, Events 1 18. Closed Session: Guidelines, Public Disclosure 1 19. Council – Commission Joint Meetings: Agenda/Topics/Issues 1 20. Consent Calendar vs. Regular Agenda: Overall Criteria for Item, Amount of Contract, Type of Issue 1 21. City Manager’s Authority to Commence Investigation 1 22. Public Disclosure from Closed Sessions 0 23. Council Participation with City Staff/Stakeholders: City Manager Participation 0 24. Policy Discussion/Negotiations/Collaboration vs. Adjudication Process 0 25. Council Notification: Employee Action 0 Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150637 4 City of Hermosa Beach Mayor Governance Topics  Mayor Governance Topics 1. Council Collegiality: Trust, Respect for Difference 2. Council Protocols: E. Information Requests F. Citizen Requests G. Research on Topic H. Agenda Process/Place on Item on the Agenda 3. Council Directing Staff 4. City Representation D. Mayor E. Council F. City Manager 5. Council Agenda vs. Individual Agenda – Priority, Council Majority Direction 6. Information to Mayor – City Council: Personnel Actions 7. Council Meeting Management 8. Council Discussions: Come Prepared, Do Your Homework Done, Focus on Issues, No Attacks/Accusations 9. Roles and Responsibilities, Expectations and Actions: D. Mayor E. Councilmember F. City Manager 10. Study Sessions and Public Hearings: Motions, Staff Direction, Decisions by Majority Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150637 5 City of Hermosa Beach Other Governance Topics  Other Governance Topics 1. Minutes for: C. Council Meetings D. Boards/Commission Meetings 2. Authority to Contract for Services or Investigations 3. Council Direction/Decision 4. City Staff Reports 5. Functional Mayor – City Council: Definition 6. Notification to Public: Meetings, Hearings 7. Closed Session: Guidelines, Public Disclosure 8. Council – Commission Joint Meetings: Agenda/Topics/Issues 9. Consent Calendar vs. Regular Agenda: Overall Criteria for Item, Amount of Contract, Type of Issues 10. City Manager’s Authority to Commence Investigation Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150637 6 Governance Guiding Principles Mayor and City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1. Respect others as we want to be respected: Councilmember, City Staff and Public. 2. Listen with an open mind to others and strive to understand, before stating an opinion or judging. 3. Respect chain of command by following the adopted protocols and defined roles/responsibilities. 4. Do your homework, come prepared, ask questions ahead of the meeting. 5. Have professional, candid debates and deliberate by focusing the discussion on the issue and data. 6. Work collaboratively as a “City Team”. 7. After a majority vote, agree to disagree move on to the next issue. 8. Represent the Council decisions and policy direction. 9. Focus questions to inform each other, convince a colleague, educate the public. 10. Negotiate with each other; look for ways to common ground and compromise. 11. Be concise in your comments focusing on the issue, avoid redundancy 12. Talk to each other, less to camera 13. Avoid personal attacks and accusations; taking actions personally, polarizing the discussion 14. Support each other Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150637 7 Mayor and City Council Protocols: Operating Guidelines for City Council and City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Protocol 1 Simple Information  Contact Department Director or City Manager.  If Department Director is contacted, copy City Manager.  Department Head will contact City Manager.  Council members should share expectations and your preferred form of communications. Protocol 2 Workload on a Topic  Contact City Manager.  Council may research a topic and bring information to the City Manager.  If research requires more than 1 hour; the topic will be taken to Council for direction.  Council can bring up topic during “Other Matters” for direction.  Information reports may be shared with Council at the discretion of the City Attorney and City Manager. Protocol 3 Citizen Service Request A. First Contact  Refer to City Manager and/or Department Head.  Council members should share expectations of further communication on actions or city follow up. B. Unsatisfactory Contact  Refer to City Manager.  City Manager will inform Council on follow up actions by the City. Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150637 8 Protocol 4 Agenda Process A. Placing an item  Contact City Manager  Place on “Other Matter” for Council direction.  Two Councilmembers will determine the placement on a future Council agenda for initial discussion with brief staff report. (1 page) B. Question on item  Contact (email or call) Department Director, with a copy to City Manager.  Presentation will incorporate the questions.  Information will be shared with all Councilmembers. C. Agenda Preview  Identify topics for next Council agenda. Protocol 5 Communications: Council and Staff  City Manager will share the same information at the same time with all Councilmembers.  City Manager will use Council as a resource.  City Council and staff should avoid surprises or last minute items/information.  City Manager should inform Councilmember on topic of potential impact. Protocol 6 Employee Contact A. Employee initiated  Report contact to City Manager on topics: employment, management or policy direction.  Refer employee to supervisor or Department Head. B. Council initiated  Social contact only.  If a community issue of performance, contact the City Manager and not direct the City employee. Protocol 7 Email Guidelines  Communication from Council to Council majority sent to Clerk.  For private communications, Council should use phone or personal email address.  Avoid “Reply to All”.  Use FYI for share information no reply.  Hermosa Beach address is a public record. Copyright © 2015: Lyle Sumek Associates, Inc. Project 150637 9 Protocol 8 Staff Reports  Link to vision, goals, mission and decision making tools.  Review “best practices” from other cities.  Provide thorough analysis.  Evaluate options and alternatives.  Provide a professional recommendation.  Frame discussion topic/question.  Avoid lobbying through others. Protocol 9 New Ideas  Contact City Manager. Protocol 10 Commission Communications  Commission communications is through responsible Department Director. Protocol 11 Spokesperson on City Matters  Official communication (including press release) through the Public Information Officer; Tested Mayor/Pro Tem.  Mayor and City Manager reflect the City Policy. Protocol 12 Performance Problem  Go to the City Manger.  Avoid discussion at Council meeting Protocol 13 Meeting Management 1. Clarifying the direction from Mayor – City Council summary at the end. 2. Discourage applause, boos or emotional reactions. 3. If large number (10 or more) individuals in audience to speak to Mayor and City Council reduce time limit from 3 minutes to 2 minutes, encourage submission of written materials. 4. Schedule a 3rd Council meeting if needed. 5. Presentation to Council: avoid reading report or overhead. 6. Brief staff/consultant presentation (10 minutes). 7. 1 Minute for announcing events. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH :: DECISION-MAKING TOOL This decision-making tool is designed to: 1. Enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of our government. 2. Identify & optimize opportunities for residents and businesses to improve our quality of life in Hermosa Beach. 3. Create a culture of innovation, so that our challenges become our opportunities and our opportunities enhance our community brand. 4. Ensure the values & priorities of all residents & business owners are considered during the analysis & deliberation of actions. 5. Deliver transparency to the decision-making process so that the public can make informed decisions. Small Beach Town Healthy Active Lifestyle Economic & Environmental Sustainability Vision & Innovation Safe & Mindful Community Environmentally Conscious Community Business Friendly Community ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT + 0 - Does it enhance / preserve open space? + 0 - Is it in line with Hermosa Beach’s carbon neutral goal? + 0 - Does it positively affect the health of the community? + 0 - Does it protect Hermosa Beach’s natural resources? + 0 - Does it keep the beach and ocean clean? + 0 - Does it promote walkability/ bikeability? QUALITY OF LIFE IMPACT + 0 - Does it enhance our beach culture? + 0 - Does it enhance outdoor recreation? + 0 - Is it family friendly? + 0 - Does it positively impact the health and safety of residents? + 0 - Does it bring the community together? + 0 - Does it serve the diversity of our population? + 0 - Does it acknowledge our cultural heritage? + 0 - Is it an appropriate scale for Hermosa Beach? + 0 - Is it aesthetically appropriate? + 0 - Is it a complementary use of public and private space? ECONOMIC IMPACT + 0 - Is it business-friendly? + 0 - Does it support our schools? + 0 - Does it improve our infrastructure? + 0 - Does it improve property values? + 0 - Does it promote our Brand? + 0 - Is it entrepreneurial? + 0 - Does it serve the local market? + 0 - Does it reduce cost, waste or reliance on city resources? + 0 - Does it balance public and private interests? + 0 - Does it increase tax and other revenues going to the community? CATALYST FOR INNOVATION Is this a potential catalyst for strategic, transformative and differentiated development, or is this “business as usual”? Will this define and enhance the City brand to attract businesses, investment, tourists and like-minded residents? Will this activate community involvement, participation, and innovation? Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 15-0827 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Closed Session of November 24, 2015 MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on November 17, 2015. Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 15-0825 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Closed Session of November 24, 2015 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Existing Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) Name of Case: Miller v. City of Hermosa Beach, et al. United States District Court, Case Number. 2:15 - CV - 8464 Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 15-0826 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Closed Session of November 24, 2015 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Anticipation of Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Council on the advice of its legal counsel, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the City Council. Number of Potential Cases:1 (E&B Natural Resources Management) Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/19/2015Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Violent Crimes Oct Sep Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change Murder 0 0 0 0.0%0 0 0 0.0%0 0 0 0.0% Sex Crimes 0 1 -1 -100.0%0 2 -2 -100.0%7 7 0 0.0% Robbery 0 0 0 0.0%0 0 0 0.0%9 9 0 0.0% Aggravated Assaults 2 1 1 100.0%2 0 2 N.C.23 18 5 27.8% Simple Assault 8 5 3 60.0%8 9 -1 -11.1%51 75 -24 -32.0% Total Violent Crimes 10 7 3 42.9%10 11 -1 -9.1%90 109 -19 -17.4% Property Crimes Oct Sep Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change Burglary 7 7 0 0.0%7 10 -3 -30.0%108 83 25 30.1% Theft 34 43 -9 -20.9%34 30 4 13.3%376 334 42 12.6% Auto Theft 1 5 -4 -80.0%1 3 -2 -66.7%31 28 3 10.7% Total Property Crimes 42 55 -13 -23.6%42 43 -1 -2.3%515 445 70 15.7% Total Part I Crimes 52 62 -10 -16.1%52 54 -2 -3.7%605 554 51 9.2% Arrests Oct Sep Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change DUI 6 10 -4 -40.0%6 8 -2 -25.0%79 145 -66 -45.5% Adult 74 58 16 27.6%74 61 13 21.3%610 743 -133 -17.9% Juvenile 0 1 -1 -100.0%0 0 0 0.0%4 5 -1 -20.0% Citations Oct Sep Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change Misdemeanor 73 59 14 23.7%73 65 8 12.3%687 917 -230 -25.1% Muni Code 15 17 -2 -11.8%15 69 -54 -78.3%499 719 -220 -30.60% Traffic 154 151 3 2.0%154 221 -67 -30.3%1483 1938 -455 -23.48% Parking 4812 4936 -124 -2.5%4812 5131 -319 -6.2%52311 61609 -9298 -15.1% Animal Control 1 0 1 N.C.1 0 1 N.C.6 13 -7 -53.8% Traffic Accident Reports Oct Sep Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change Fatal 0 0 0 0.0%0 0 0 0.0%1 0 1 N.C. Injury 8 4 4 100.0%8 4 4 100.0%56 41 15 36.6% Non-Injury 35 28 7 25.0%35 26 9 34.6%250 239 11 4.6% Calls For Service Oct Sep Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change 2015 2014 Diff % Change Calls For Service 2569 2474 95 3.8%2569 2404 165 6.9%25195 25782 -587 -2.3% Parking 255 260 -5 -1.9%255 235 20 8.5%2445 2558 -113 -4.4% Animal Control 159 135 24 17.8%159 149 10 6.7%1107 1179 -72 -6.1% INCREASE N.C. Not Calculable. To calculate the percentage change you use Time 1 - Time 2/Time2= a number x100= Percentage change. You cannot divide any number by 0 and receive a valid number 2015 October YTD 2015 October YTD 2015 October YTD Hermosa Beach Police Department 2015 October YTD Monthly Part I Crime Statistics October 2015 2015 October YTD 2015 October YTD Respectfully Submitted to: City Manager Tom Bakaly Approved by: Chief Sharon Papa Prepared by: Jenette Osborne As in all statistical comparisons, caution should be exercised in interpreting percent changes. When smaller numbers are compared the result is a greater percentage change; in other words, a more dramatic result is achieved. *Due to change in reporting processes there may be a variation in previously reported statistics