HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution 25-11 - 507.509 Pier AvenueCITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
RESOLUTION NO. 25-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING A 392-SQUARE FOOT
PAINTED DISPLAY ON THE EASTERLY SHARED WALL OF EXISTING
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS LOCATED AT 507-509 PIER AVENUE IS A
MURAL AND IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT.
The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and
order as follows:
WHEREAS, an application was filed on February 19, 2025 by the applicant
Albro Lundy, seeking Planning Commission determination whether an existing
display covering 392-square-foot painted display on the eastern wall of existing
commercial buildings is consistent with the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code
(HBMC) definition of "Mural" for buildings located at 507-509 Pier Avenue .
WHEREAS, HBMC Section 17 .50 .030 defines a mural as "a pictorial
representation not specifically identifying goods or services offered by the
business on the premises."
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its public meeting of August
19, 2025 considered all testimony and evidence, both oral and written , that
was presented to the Planning Commission .
WHEREAS, the proposed display is categorically exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act defined in CEQA Section 15301 Class 1
Existing Facilities , as the project involves negligible or no expansion of an existing
use. The proposed display is painted directly onto the easterly facade of the
existing building and would not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable
indi rect physical change in the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission determines that the display meets
the definition of a mural as set forth in HBMC Section 17.50 .030 , because the
display does not include commodification elements tied to the commercial use ,
and the existing displays are artistic depictions.
SECTION 2. Based on the evidence received at the public meeting, the
Planning Commission hereby further finds, determines, and declares that the
project is consistent with the City's General Plan {PLAN Hermosa) because the
display is a mural consistent with HBMC Section 17 .50.030 .
General Plan Consistency
Goals & Policies
Land Use and Design Element
Goal 11: A proud and visible identity as
an arts and cultural community
Findings
The project integrates elements that
Policy 11.1 Locally appropriate art. reflect the creativity and coastal
Prioritize public art that reinforces the identity of Hermosa Beach. The mural
identity of Hermosa Beach, features a wave and mountain
incorporating the culture, people, reminiscent of works by the master
neighborhoods and ideas. Japanese artist Utagawa Hiroshige.
Policy 11.2 Creative expression in the The building is privately owned, and
built environment. the applicant proposing the project is
Encourage the infusion of creative committed to enhancing cultural
expression within the city's built vitality by incorporating public art into
environment to create a memorable their development.
urban landscape that respects the
past and builds for the future.
Policy 11.8 Public art in private The project muralist uses his skill
development concept art to create for others. This
Actively encourage private local artist's perspective and needs
development to contribute to the are integral to the project, ensuring
cultural and economic health and the that the mural reflects both the artistic
public realm through incorporation of vision and the community's character.
public art .
SECTION 3. Based on the foregoing , the Planning Commission hereby
approves Mural Determination Case No. MD25-01 and determines the
painted display is a mural , subject to the following Conditions of Approval :
1. The applicant shall provide the Community Development Department with
a copy of the Operating Agreement for Refoua LLC, property owner of 507
Pier Avenue .
2. The mural shall be maintained in strict accordance with the design
reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Any modifications to
the approved design must receive prior approval from the
Planning Commission.
3. Any acts of vandalism occurring on the site must be addressed, and the
affected areas must be cleaned or repaired within 48 hours of discovery.
SECTION 4. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 , any
legal challenge to the decision of the Planning Commission , after exhaustion
of any available administrative remedies, must be made within 90 days after
the final decision by the City. The Hermosa Beach City Council may on its own
initiative review all actions of the Planning Commission. If the City Council
does not initiate review of this decision as set forth in Hermosa Beach Municipal
Code Section 2.52 .040, this decision will become final.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this 19th day of August, 2025.
VOTE:
A YES : 5 -Chairperson Kate Hir sh , Vice Chairperson Stephen lzant,
Commissioner Michael Flaherty, Commissioner Peter Hoffman, and
Commissioner Greg McNally
NOES :
ABSTAIN :
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the foregoing PC Resolution 25-11 is a true and complete record
of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach,
California, at its regular meeting of August 19, 2025.
Kate Hirsh, Chair Alison Becker, Secretary
Date