Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-10-15 PC AgendaPlanning Commission City of Hermosa Beach Regular Meeting Agenda - Final City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Chair David Pedersen Vice Chair Peter Hoffman Commissioners Michael Flaherty Rob Saemann Marie Rice Council Chambers7:00 PMTuesday, October 15, 2019 1 October 15, 2019Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final Note: No Smoking Is Allowed in The City Hall Council Chambers THE PUBLIC COMMENT IS LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER Planning Commission agendas and staff reports are available for review on the City's web site at www.hermosabch.org. Wireless access is available in the City Council Chambers for mobile devices: Network ID: CHB-Guest, Password: chbguest Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the Community Development Department during normal business hours from Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. and on the City's website. Final determinations of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the next regular City Council meeting date. If the 10th day falls on a Friday or City holiday, the appeal deadline is extended to the next City business day. Appeals shall be in written form and filed with the City Clerk's office, accompanied by an appeal fee. The City Clerk will set the appeal for public hearing before the City of Hermosa Beach City Council at the earliest date possible. If you challenge any City of Hermosa Beach decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described on this agenda, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices will be available for check out at the meeting. If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call or submit your request in writing to the Community Development Department at (310) 318-0242 at least 48 hours (two working days) prior to the meeting time to inform us of your needs and to determine if/how accommodation is feasible. Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/20/2024 2 October 15, 2019Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final Submit your comments via eComment in three easy steps: Note: Your comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name, but please do not provide any other personal information (i.e. phone numbers, addresses, etc) that you do not want to be published. 1. Go to the Agendas/Minutes/Video webpage and find the meeting you’d like to submit comments on. Click on the eComment button for your selected meeting. 2. Find the agenda item for which you would like to provide a comment. You can select a specific agenda item/project or provide general comments under the Oral/Written Communications item. 3. Sign in to your SpeakUp Hermosa Account or as a guest, enter your comment in the field provided, provide your name, and if applicable, attach files before submitting your comment. eComments can be submitted as soon as the meeting materials are published, but will only be accepted until 12:00 pm on the date of the meeting to ensure Planning Commission and staff have the ability to review comments prior to the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Oral / Written Communications Section I CONSENT CALENDAR 5.REPORT 19-0675 Approval of the September 17, 2019 Planning Commission Action Minutes Recommendation:To approve the Planning Commission action minutes of the September 17, 2019 regular meeting. 6. Resolution(s) for Consideration - None *************************************************************************************************************** THE RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED BELOW ARE FROM THE PLANNING STAFF AND ARE RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY. THE FINAL DECISION ON EACH ITEM RESTS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION. PLEASE DO NOT ASSUME THAT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WILL BE THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. *************************************************************************************************************** REPORT 19-0680 Information Only: Public Hearing Notices and Projects Zoning Map Section II Page 3 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/20/2024 3 October 15, 2019Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final PUBLIC HEARING 7.REPORT 19-0682 CUP 19-3 -- Conditional Use Permit Amendment request to modify an existing non-conforming rooftop wireless telecommunication facility by removing and relocating antennas within new screening boxes below the existing building height and upgrading equipment (AT&T Mobility) at 2447 Pacific Coast Highway, and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (continued from the August 20, 2019 meeting) Recommendation:Continue the public hearing to the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting of November 19, 2019. 8.REPORT 19-0684 CUP 19-6 and PARK 19-3: Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan Amendment request to allow a gymnasium/health and fitness facility (assembly hall) at 1559 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 103 (CorePower Yoga), with shared consolidated parking and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Recommendation:Adopt the attached resolutions approving CUP 19-6 and PARK 19-3 to allow a gymnasium/health and fitness facility (assembly hall) at 1559 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 103 (CorePower Yoga), with shared consolidated parking and determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 9.REPORT 19-0652 CON 19-5, PDP 19-8, VTPM #82639 - Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82639 for a two-unit detached condominium project at 626 Longfellow Avenue, and determine the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Recommendation:Adopt the attached resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82639 for a two-unit detached condominium project at 626 Longfellow Avenue, subject to conditions, and determining the project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 10.REPORT 19-0685 PDP 19-11- Precise Development Plan Amendment to extend the building permit expiration date, pursuant to Section 15.04.050 of the Municipal Code, for a mixed use building at 2700 Manhattan Avenue Recommendation:Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution amending the Precise Development Plan to extend the building permit expiration date one additional year. Section III 11. Staff Items Page 4 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/20/2024 4 October 15, 2019Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final a.REPORT 19-0683 Draft Coastal Zone Parking Assessment & Recommendations b.REPORT 19-0681 RECEIVE TRI-ANNUAL REPORT FOR ON-SALE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Recommendation:Receive and file the report for informational purposes. This tri-annual review covers the period from March 1, 2019 to August 31, 2019. Based on the information in the report, no establishment has reached the "Standard Initiating Planning Commission Review." c.REPORT 19-0676 Verbal Report on City Council Actions d.REPORT 19-0677 Verbal Status Report on Major Planning Projects e.REPORT 19-0678 November 19, 2019 Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda Items Recommendation:To receive and file the November 19, 2019 Planning Commission tentative future agenda items. f.REPORT 19-0679 Community Development Department Activity Report of May and June 2019 Recommendation:To receive and file the May and June 2019 Community Development Department activity report. The June 2019 activity report will be posted as a supplemental attachment prior to the October 15, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. 12. Commissioner Items 13. Adjournment Adjourn to the November 7, 2019 special meeting. Page 5 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/20/2024 5 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 19-0675 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Regular Meeting of October 15, 2019 Approval of the September 17, 2019 Planning Commission Action Minutes Recommended Action: To approve the Planning Commission action minutes of the September 17, 2019 regular meeting. Attachment: 1.September 17, 2019 Planning Commission action minutes Respectfully Submitted by: Beverly Tuazon, Administrative Assistant Approved: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™6 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 City of Hermosa Beach Action Minutes - Draft Planning Commission Chair David Pedersen Vice Chair Peter Hoffman Commissioners Michael Flaherty Rob Saemann Marie Rice 7:00 PM Council ChambersTuesday, September 17, 2019 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call Commissioner Michael Flaherty, Vice Chair Peter Hoffman, Commissioner Marie Rice, Commissioner Rob Saemann, and Chair David Pedersen Present:5 - Absent:0 Also Present: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Lauren Langer, Assistant City Attorney Kathy Khang, Assistant Planner 4. Oral / Written Communications Coming forward to speak: Jim Lissner and Tony Higgins. Section I CONSENT CALENDAR 5.REPORT 19-0618 Approval of the August 20, 2019 Planning Commission Action Minutes August 20, 2019 Action MinutesAttachments: The Planning Commission consensus was to approve the Planning Commission action minutes of the August 20, 2019 regular meeting with a correction to the speaker Sheryl Main's name in item number 13. Page 1City of Hermosa Beach DRAFT7 September 17, 2019Planning Commission Action Minutes - Draft 6. Resolution(s) for Consideration - None *************************************************************************************************************** THE RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED BELOW ARE FROM THE PLANNING STAFF AND ARE RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY. THE FINAL DECISION ON EACH ITEM RESTS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION. PLEASE DO NOT ASSUME THAT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WILL BE THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. *************************************************************************************************************** REPORT 19-0612 Information Only: Public Hearing Notices and Projects Zoning Map 1. Public Notices 2. Project Zoning Maps Attachments: Section II PUBLIC HEARING 7.REPORT 19-0619 CON 19-3, PDP 19-6, VTPM #82373 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82373 for a two-unit detached condominium project at 421 Monterey Boulevard, and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Site Photographs 3. Project Plans 4. Radius Map 5. Poster Verification Attachments: Coming forward to speak: Brandon Strauss and Cathy Arianpour. ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Hoffman and seconded by Commissioner Saemann to adopt the resolution as presented approving the Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82373 for a two-unit detached condominium project at 421 Monterey Boulevard, subject to conditions, and determining the project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Commissioner Flaherty, Vice Chair Hoffman, Commissioner Rice, Commissioner Saemann, and Chair Pedersen 5 - Absent:0 8.REPORT 19-0613 PDP 19-10 -- Precise Development Plan Amendment to expand an existing 238 square-foot roof deck, by 510 square feet, totaling 748 square Page 2City of Hermosa Beach DRAFT8 September 17, 2019Planning Commission Action Minutes - Draft feet at one of the three residential condominium units below the 30-foot height limit at a mixed use building at 40 Hermosa Avenue, and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 1. Draft PDP Resolution of Approval 2. Applicant Submittal- Plans 3. Applicant Submittal- Renderings 4. PC Reso 04-14 approving mixed use project 5. PC Reso 07-24 approving architectural modifications 6. Public Notification 500 Foot Radius Map 7. Public Notification Legal Posters Attachments: Coming forward to speak: John Musolino and Skip Blomer. ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Saemann and seconded by Commissioner Hoffman to adopt the resolution as presented approving Precise Development Plan Amendment 19-10 to expand an existing 238 square-foot roof deck, by 510 square feet, totaling 748 square feet at one of the three (northernmost) residential condominium units below the 30-foot height limit at a mixed use building at 40 Hermosa Avenue, and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Commissioner Flaherty, Vice Chair Hoffman, Commissioner Rice, Commissioner Saemann, and Chair Pedersen 5 - Absent:0 Section III HEARING 9.REPORT 19-0614 S4 #37 SIGN REVIEW - Determination on whether a proposed 212.5 square foot display on the south wall of the building at 101 Hermosa Avenue is a mural, and determination that the proposed display is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act. 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Site Photographs 3. Applicant Submittal 4. Notice Poster Verification Attachments: Coming forward to speak: Mickey Mance. ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Saemann and seconded by Commissioner Flaherty to adopt the resolution as presented determining that the proposed display covering 212.5 square feet of surface area on the south side of an existing building is consistent with the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) definition of ‘Mural’ at 101 Hermosa Avenue (Mickey’s Deli), and determine that the Page 3City of Hermosa Beach DRAFT9 September 17, 2019Planning Commission Action Minutes - Draft proposed display is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Commissioner Flaherty, Vice Chair Hoffman, Commissioner Rice, Commissioner Saemann, and Chair Pedersen 5 - Absent:0 10.REPORT 19-0615 LLA 19-1-- Lot Line Adjustment between a vacant parcel at 720 24th Place (APN: 4184-020-010) and the adjacent parcel to the west (APN: 4184-019-001); and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Zoning Map 3. Assessor Map 4. Site Photos and Public Notice Posters 5. Applicant Submittal Including Lot Exhibits Attachments: Commissioner Saemann recused himself due to a financial conflict. Coming forward to speak: Dunham Stewart. ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Hoffman and seconded by Commissioner Rice to adopt the resolution as presented approving the lot line adjustment between a vacant parcel at 720 24th Place (APN: 4184-020-010) and the adjacent parcel to the west (APN: 4184-019-001) finding that the lot line adjustment conforms to the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Map Act; and determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Commissioner Flaherty, Vice Chair Hoffman, Commissioner Rice, and Chair Pedersen 4 - Absent:0 Recused:Commissioner Saemann1 - Section IV 11. Staff Items REPORT 19-0607 a.Verbal Report on City Council Actions REPORT 19-0608 b.Verbal Status Report on Major Planning Projects c.REPORT 19-0616 October 15, 2019 Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda Items Planning Commission October 15, 2019 Tentative Future AgendaAttachments: Page 4City of Hermosa Beach DRAFT10 September 17, 2019Planning Commission Action Minutes - Draft ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Hoffman and seconded by Commissioner Rice to receive and file the October 15, 2019 Planning Commission tentative future agenda items. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. d.REPORT 19-0617 Community Development Department Activity Report of May and June 2019 12. Commissioner Items 13. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:09pm by Chair Pedersen. The next scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission is October 15, 2019. Page 5City of Hermosa Beach DRAFT11 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 19-0680 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Regular Meeting of October 15, 2019 Information Only: Public Hearing Notices and Projects Zoning Map Attachments: 1.Public Notices 2.Projects Zoning Map City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™12 Easy Reader Run Date: October 3, 2019 DISPLAY Acct: 7010-2110 City of Hermosa Beach PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach shall hold a public hearing on Tuesday, October 15, 2019, to consider the following: 1. CUP 19-6 and PARK 19-3 -- Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan Amendment request for an assembly hall use for a fitness center on a (SPA-8) Specific Plan Area 8 zoned lot at 1559 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 103 (Corepower Yoga), with shared consolidated parking and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 2. CUP 19-5, PDP 19-8 & VTPM No. 82639 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82639 for a two-unit detached condominium project at 626 Longfellow Avenue, and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 3. PDP 19-11 -- Precise Development Plan Amendment to extend the building permit expiration date, pursuant to Section 15.04.050 of the Municipal Code, for a mixed use building currently under construction at 2700 Manhattan Avenue, and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 4. CUP 19-3- Conditional Use Permit Amendment request to modify an existing non-conforming rooftop wireless telecommunication facility by removing and relocating antennas within new screening boxes below the existing building height and upgrading equipment (AT&T Mobility) at 2447 Pacific Coast Highway, and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This item was continued from the July 16, 2019 meeting to the October 15, 2019 meeting. The applicant requests an additional continuance to the November 19th meeting. SAID PUBLIC HEARINGS shall be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate and speak at these hearings at the above time and place. For inclusion in the agenda packet to be distributed, written comments of interested parties should be submitted to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, in care of City Hall at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 prior to Thursday, October 10, 2019, at 12:00 noon. All written testimony by any interested party will be accepted prior to or at the scheduled time on the agenda for the matter. IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, at, or prior to, the public hearing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Community Development Department, Planning Division, at (310) 318-0242 or fax to (310) 937-6235. The Department is open from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday. Please contact a staff planner to discuss any project on the Planning Commission agenda. A copy of the staff report(s) in the Planning Commission packet will be available for public review at the end of the business day on Thursday, October 10, 2019, on the City’s website at www.hermosabch.org. Relevant Municipal Code sections are also available on the website. Elaine Doerfling City Clerk f:95\cclerk\legads\display\2018\planning\pc10-15-19 13 14 0.1 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATIONWGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Miles0.1 Notes © City of Hermosa Beach Legend The map generated is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map do not have survey grade accuracy but represent close approximation. 0.050 1:2,939 1559 Pacific Coast Hwy Suite 103 Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan Amendment City Boundary Parcels Zoning R-1 Single Family Residential R-1A Limited Single-Family Residential R-2 Two Family Residential R-2B Limited Multiple Family Residential R-3 Multiple Family Residential R-P Residential-Professional RPD Residential Planned Development R-3PD Multiple Family Planned Development C-1 Limited Business and Residential C-2 General Commercial C-3 General and Highway Commercial M-1 Light Manufacturing OS Open Space OS-1 Restricted Open Space OS-2 Restricted Open Space OS-O Open Space Overlay MHP Mobile Home Park SPA Specific Plan Area (Residential) SPA Specific Plan Area (Commercial) 15 0.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Miles0.0 Notes © City of Hermosa Beach Legend The map generated is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map do not have survey grade accuracy but represent close approximation. 0.020 1:1,470 626 Longfellow Ave Two-Unit Condominium City Boundary Parcels Zoning R-1 Single Family Residential R-1A Limited Single-Family Residential R-2 Two Family Residential R-2B Limited Multiple Family Residential R-3 Multiple Family Residential R-P Residential-Professional RPD Residential Planned Development R-3PD Multiple Family Planned Development C-1 Limited Business and Residential C-2 General Commercial C-3 General and Highway Commercial M-1 Light Manufacturing OS Open Space OS-1 Restricted Open Space OS-2 Restricted Open Space OS-O Open Space Overlay MHP Mobile Home Park SPA Specific Plan Area (Residential) SPA Specific Plan Area (Commercial) 16 0.1 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Miles0.1 Notes © City of Hermosa Beach Legend The map generated is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map do not have survey grade accuracy but represent close approximation. 0.050 1:2,939 2447 Pacific Coast Hwy Conditional Use Permit Amendment City Boundary Parcels Zoning R-1 Single Family Residential R-1A Limited Single-Family Residential R-2 Two Family Residential R-2B Limited Multiple Family Residential R-3 Multiple Family Residential R-P Residential-Professional RPD Residential Planned Development R-3PD Multiple Family Planned Development C-1 Limited Business and Residential C-2 General Commercial C-3 General and Highway Commercial M-1 Light Manufacturing OS Open Space OS-1 Restricted Open Space OS-2 Restricted Open Space OS-O Open Space Overlay MHP Mobile Home Park SPA Specific Plan Area (Residential) SPA Specific Plan Area (Commercial) 17 0.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Miles0.0 Notes © City of Hermosa Beach Legend The map generated is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map do not have survey grade accuracy but represent close approximation. 0.020 1:1,470 2700 Manhattan Ave Precise Development Plan Amendment City Boundary Parcels Zoning R-1 Single Family Residential R-1A Limited Single-Family Residential R-2 Two Family Residential R-2B Limited Multiple Family Residential R-3 Multiple Family Residential R-P Residential-Professional RPD Residential Planned Development R-3PD Multiple Family Planned Development C-1 Limited Business and Residential C-2 General Commercial C-3 General and Highway Commercial M-1 Light Manufacturing OS Open Space OS-1 Restricted Open Space OS-2 Restricted Open Space OS-O Open Space Overlay MHP Mobile Home Park SPA Specific Plan Area (Residential) SPA Specific Plan Area (Commercial) 18 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 19-0682 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Regular Meeting of October 15, 2019 CUP 19-3 -- Conditional Use Permit Amendment request to modify an existing non-conforming rooftop wireless telecommunication facility by removing and relocating antennas within new screening boxes below the existing building height and upgrading equipment (AT&T Mobility) at 2447 Pacific Coast Highway, and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (continued from the August 20, 2019 meeting) APPLICANT:AT&T C/O Chris Pell 1452 Edinger Avenue, 3rd Floor Tustin, CA 92780 OWNER:2447 Pacific Coast Highway, LLC 2447 Pacific Coast Highway Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Recommended Action: Continue the public hearing to the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting of November 19, 2019. Analysis: On July 16, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider Conditional Use Permit 19-3. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission continued the request to August 20, 2019, to allow the applicant time to provide additional information on the facility. At the request of the applicant, the Planning Commission further continued the hearing to October 15, 2019. The applicant continues to work on providing the requested information. They are now requesting a continuance to November 19, 2019 to allow additional time to address the Planning Commission’s comments from their July 16, 2019 meeting. Attachments: 1.Public Notice Posters City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™19 Staff Report REPORT 19-0682 Respectfully Submitted by: David Blumenthal, AICP, Senior Planner Approved: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™20 Public Notice Posters 21 22 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 19-0684 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Regular Meeting of October 15, 2019 CUP 19-6 and PARK 19-3: Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan Amendment request to allow a gymnasium/health and fitness facility (assembly hall) at 1559 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 103 (CorePower Yoga), with shared consolidated parking and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Applicant:Keith Glassman, GPA Inc. for CorePower Yoga 1111 Sartori Ave. Torrance, CA 90501 Owner:REG8 Plaza Hermosa, LLC 915 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2200 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Recommended Action: Adopt the attached resolutions approving CUP 19-6 and PARK 19-3 to allow a gymnasium/health and fitness facility (assembly hall) at 1559 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 103 (CorePower Yoga), with shared consolidated parking and determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Background: City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 1 of 9 powered by Legistar™23 Staff Report REPORT 19-0684 Located within the Pacific Coast Highway corridor, the subject building at 1559 Pacific Coast Highway is located within the Plaza Hermosa shopping center. The subject tenant space is on the first floor of a two-story, multi-tenant building at the northeast corner of Hermosa Beach Shopping Center currently occupied by Kriser’s Feeding Pets for Life pet store. Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center is bordered by 16th Street to the north, Pier Avenue to the south, and Ardmore Avenue to the west, and Pacific Coast Highway to the east. The nearest residential area is the Commodore Condominium building (R-3 Multi-Family Residential zone) across 16th Street located approximately 60 feet from the center’s north property line behind CVS Pharmacy and Vons Market and approximately 300 feet from the Corepower Yoga tenant space. The proposed business, Corepower Yoga, is a gymnasium/health and fitness center and assembly hall use that proposed to provide many styles of yoga classes taught by certified yoga instructors. Hours of operation are proposed between 6:00 A.M. and 9:30 P.M., 7 days a week, with up to 40 students at one time. Equipment will include: 3-to-12 pound hand weights, weight racks, stabilizing foam yoga blocks, and up to 40 floor mats on studio flooring described as “Forest RX Pur Rolled Vinyl flooring with 7mm thickness rubber back sheet vinyl Class 1.” Plans indicate there will be 4 wall- mounted speakers to be installed near the corners of the yoga studio area. A condition of approval is included in the proposed CUP resolution requiring the doors and windows to be closed when the speakers are in use. Analysis: The project site is located in SPA-8 (Specific Plan Area No. 8) zone, which refers to the C-3 (General Commercial) zone for permitted uses. The SPA-8 zoning designation provides opportunities for the full range of office, retail, and service businesses deemed suitable for the City and appropriate for the Pacific Coast Highway commercial corridor. Pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) Section 17.26.030, the proposed gymnasium/health and fitness (assembly hall) use requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the SPA-8 zone as stated in the permitted use list. The HBMC defines an assembly hall as any building, or portion of a building, used for public or private gatherings. For example, and without limitation, “assembly hall" includes convention/meeting halls, business schools, funeral homes, gymnasium/health and fitness centers, educational institutions (K-12), game arcades with five (5) or more machines, miniature golf courses, large day spas, movie theaters, museums, music academies, religious institutions, and skating rinks, whether available for public or private use. The Zoning Code definition for gymnasium/fitness centers is defined as follows: “Gymnasium/health and fitness center" means a facility, whether open to the public or a private club, which provides the indoor space, equipment and the supervision/training/teaching for physical activities including but not limited to sporting activities, exercising, martial arts, aerobic dancing, weight training, gymnastics and spas.” A Parking Plan Amendment is required due to changes in the existing consolidated parking plan and analysis for the proposed Corepower Yoga in Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center. A consolidated parking plan with 428 spaces was approved for PARK 12-6 by Planning Commission Resolution 12- 14 on July 17, 2012. A new, comprehensive parking study has been provided for the shared parking City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 2 of 9 powered by Legistar™24 Staff Report REPORT 19-0684 plan for Corepower Yoga and other incremental parking changes since 2012, specifically including modifications to provide additional ADA parking for Hermosa Fish Shop and Torrance Memorial for a net loss of 5 spaces, for a current total of 423 spaces. The new consolidated parking plan includes planned changes to accommodate the installation of electric vehicle charging stations/equipment and conversion of 3 existing standard spaces to 2 ADA-accessible electric vehicle parking stalls, for a net loss of 4 spaces. The new consolidated parking plan will provide 419 spaces, which is further described in the attached parking study and below table. Zoning Code Section 17.44.210 allows for parking plans and Section 17.44.220 allows for consolidated parking plans in retail centers with more than 10,000 square feet of retail space. The Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center includes 94,716 square feet of floor area, and is therefore eligible for consideration of a consolidated parking plan. A parking study has been provided, including parking demand analyses, parking utilization surveys, and shared parking analysis taking into consideration the proposed Corepower Yoga classes of up to 40 students. Table 1 of the parking study indicates that, without a consolidated parking plan, the combined uses and parking requirements would total 467 parking spaces. Utilizing the consolidated parking computation of 1 parking space per 250 square feet of retail area, the required parking for Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center total of 94,716 square feet is 379 parking spaces. As noted in the above table and in the parking study, 419 spaces are proposed, including Corepower Yoga and the proposed ADA parking and charging stations. The parking study is provided as an attachment to this report. The parking study shared parking analysis indicates that peak demand occurs on weekdays at 11:00 A.M., when 349 spaces would be occupied, providing for a surplus of 70 spaces or 16.7% of the existing parking supply; and for weekend the shared parking demand analysis forecasts a peak demand of 270 spaces at 5:00 P.M., when 270 spaces would be occupied, providing for a surplus of 149 spaces or 35.6%, following establishment of the proposed Corepower Yoga. CUP Criteria, Conditions and Standards HBMC Section 17.40.020 establishes the criteria, conditions, and standards for reviewing, granting, and amending CUPs in order to reduce the potential for adverse secondary land use impacts. In considering the granting of any CUP for any use, the following criteria for granting said permit shall be considered: City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 3 of 9 powered by Legistar™25 Staff Report REPORT 19-0684 17.40.020 General criteria for all uses A.Distance from existing residential uses: The nearest residences and residential zone is the Commodore Condominium building (R-3 Multi-Family Residential zone) across 16th Street located approximately 60 feet from the center’s north property line behind CVS Pharmacy and Vons Market and approximately 300 feet from the Corepower Yoga tenant space. Conditions of approval are included in the draft resolution to reduce potential noise and vibration impacts to nearby uses, including sound dampening mats to be located in the studio, requiring doors and windows to be closed during classes, requiring that the building be equipped with air conditioning, and requiring that noise emanating from the property complies with the City's Noise Ordinance. B.The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking facilities, and its distance from the proposed use: The proposed yoga studio will be located in a 2,298 square foot first-floor tenant space of Building C, located at the northeast corner of the center adjacent to the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and 16th Street. Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center surface parking is adjacent to the building to the west and south of the building. A parking plan amendment is required due to changes in the existing consolidated parking plan and analysis for the proposed Corepower Yoga in Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center. A consolidated parking plan with 428 spaces was approved for PARK 12-6 by Planning Commission Resolution 12-14 on July 17, 2012. A new, comprehensive parking study has been provided for the shared parking plan for Corepower Yoga and other incremental parking changes since 2012, including modifications to provide additional ADA parking for Hermosa Fish Shop and Torrance Memorial for a net loss of 5 spaces for a current total of 423 spaces. The new consolidated parking plan includes planned changes to accommodate the installation of electric vehicle charging stations/equipment and conversion of 3 existing standard spaces to 2 ADA accessible electric vehicle parking stalls, for a net loss of 4 spaces. The new consolidated parking plan will provide 419 spaces. The parking study shared parking analysis indicates that peak demand occurs on weekdays at 11:00 A.M., when 349 spaces would be occupied, providing for a surplus of 70 spaces or 16.7% of the existing parking supply; and for weekend the shared parking demand analysis forecasts a peak demand of 270 spaces at 5:00 P.M., when 270 spaces would be occupied, providing for a surplus of 149 spaces or 35.6%, following establishment of the proposed Corepower Yoga. As conditioned, the proposed use is not anticipated to create adverse parking impacts. C.Location of and distance to churches, schools, hospitals and public playgrounds: The nearest of these types of sensitive receptors are at Valley School located approximately 1,000 feet to the west, the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt Trail located across Ardmore Avenue approximately 60 feet to the west, and the Hermosa Beach Community Center located across Pier Avenue approximately 750 feet to the south of Hermosa Plaza property line. Due to the distance of the gymnasium/health and fitness (assembly hall) use, the proposed use is not anticipated to have adverse effects on Valley School, Hermosa Valley Greenbelt Trail, or the Hermosa Beach Community Center. Conditions of approval have been added to the draft resolution to mitigate potential impacts and it is unlikely that the proposed use will affect City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 4 of 9 powered by Legistar™26 Staff Report REPORT 19-0684 similar sensitive receptors in the vicinity. D. The combination of uses proposed: The 2,298 square foot tenant space will be dedicated to Corepower Yoga, a gymnasium/health and fitness center (assembly use) yoga studio and will not be combined with any other uses. Because the use will be located within a multi-tenant building in Hermosa Plaza, a 94,716 square foot retail center, the proposed use, as conditioned, is anticipated to have minimal impacts on the surrounding commercial or residential uses/buildings. Noise and vibration impacts and mitigations are detailed further in criteria I below, while parking is detailed in criteria B above. E. Precautions taken by the owner or operator of the proposed establishment to assure the compatibility of the use with surrounding uses: In order to assure compatibility with surrounding uses, the business owner proposes to utilize sound speakers within the studio portion of the interior only. A condition is included requiring Corepower Yoga to keep the doors and windows closed during classes when the speakers are on. Conditions are also included to limit Corepower Yoga to a maximum of 40 students during open hours (6:00 A.M and 9:30 P.M. daily) and all business operations must be contained within the tenant space. A minimum amount of equipment is necessary for yoga classes, including foam stabilizing blocks and hand weights, with foam mats to accommodate up to 40 students. These precautions are intended to minimize impacts related to noise and vibration. Conditions of approval are included to ensure these precautions are maintained throughout the life of the operation and, as conditioned, it is anticipated that the proposed establishment will be compatible with existing surrounding uses. Noise and vibration impacts are detailed further in criteria I below. F. The relationship of the proposed business-generated traffic volume and the size of streets serving the area: The proposed gymnasium/health and fitness center (assembly hall) yoga studio is within the consolidated parking plan for Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center. The business operations are limited to 2,298 square feet with class sizes of up to 40 students. The parking requirement in the consolidated parking plan is the same as general retail parking at 1 space per 250 square feet, which is the same as the previous retail store, of 9.2 spaces for Corepower Yoga. Pacific Coast Highway is classified as a Major Arterial Street designed to carry large volumes of traffic, Pier Avenue is considered a Minor Arterial Street, along with Major Arterial Streets, are designed to carry the majority of vehicles entering, leaving, or traveling through the city, and 16th Street is considered a Local Street designed to provide connections within neighborhoods. Local streets are not intended to serve through traffic and are generally one lane each direction with lower vehicle volumes. G. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area: No exterior façade modifications are proposed with this request. Any proposed signage will require a separate sign permit application and conform to the HBMC Section 17.50 for Signs. H. The number of similar establishments or uses within close proximity to the proposed City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 5 of 9 powered by Legistar™27 Staff Report REPORT 19-0684 establishment: Corepower Yoga will join at least 3 other yoga studio facilities located along or near the Pacific Coast Highway Corridor, including Lyfe Yoga Center at 1310 Pacific Coast Highway, Bikram Yoga at 518 Pier Avenue, and Beach Cities Yoga at 936 Hermosa Avenue. I. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use: The proposal for Corepower Yoga is to conduct yoga classes using limited equipment, including foam stabilizing blocks and hand weights with rubber yoga mats for up to 40 students. The proposed hours of operation are 6:00 A.M. to 9:30 P.M. The business proposes 4 wall-mounted speakers in the yoga studio portion of the tenant space to be used when the doors and windows are closed. The tenant space has existing air conditioning and ventilation, which facilitates keeping all doors and windows closed during periods of amplified sound inside the building. Conditions of approval are included in the draft resolution to ensure compatibility of the proposed use with surrounding uses, such as closing the doors when amplified sound is provided within the building, maintaining a neat and clean premises, complying with the City's Noise Ordinance, all activities must be conducted within the tenant space, and strictly prohibiting any dropping of weights. The proposed health and fitness facility (assembly hall) use, as conditioned, is not anticipated to create adverse impacts. J. Impact of the proposed use to the city’s infrastructure, and/or services: The existing building is adequately served by the various utility companies, infrastructure and municipal services, and the proposed use is not anticipated to place additional burden on current infrastructure and services. K. Will the establishment contribute to a concentration of similar outlets in the area: There are several yoga and fitness uses located within the City of Hermosa Beach, with approximately 3 yoga studio facilities located along or nearby the Pacific Coast Highway Corridor, including Lyfe Yoga Center at 1310 Pacific Coast Highway, Bikram Yoga at 518 Pier Avenue, and Beach Cities Yoga at 936 Hermosa Avenue. There are also several fitness centers located along or near the Pacific Coast Highway Corridor, including Anytime Fitness at 300 Pacific Coast Highway, Game Ready Performance at 307 Pacific Coast Highway, Poise Fitness at 428 Pacific Coast Highway, 24 Hour Fitness at 1605 Pacific Coast Highway, and Yard Training Center at 1106 Hermosa Avenue. Fitness centers are health based and community-serving businesses, which support the Hermosa Beach health-conscious beach culture and the associated goals and policies of PLAN Hermosa. Due to the size and type of the proposed business, there are no anticipated negative impacts from a concentration of yoga and other fitness-based businesses. L. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the Planning Commission, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole. The proposed application is CUP 19-6 for a gymnasium/health and fitness center (assembly hall)yoga studio at 1559 Pacific Coast Highway,Suite 103 (CorePower Yoga),and an Amendment to Parking Plan 19-3 for shared consolidated parking.The proposed resolutions for CUP 19-6 and Amendment to Parking Plan 19-3 include applicable conditions from the 2012 parking plan approvals plus new conditions.These new resolutions will supersede the previously-approved 2012 Resolution 12-14. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 6 of 9 powered by Legistar™28 Staff Report REPORT 19-0684 Parking Plan Criteria, Conditions and Standards HBMC Section 17.44.210 and 17.44.220 state that a parking plan may be approved by the Planning Commission to allow for a reduction in the number of spaces required and that a consolidated plan may require parking spaces for various uses be reduced in number and computed at one space per two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area when parking is consolidated in retail shopping centers over ten thousand (10,000) square feet in size. The applicant shall provide the information necessary to show that adequate parking will be provided for customers, clients, visitors and employees or when located in a vehicle parking district, the applicant shall propose an in-lieu fee according to requirements of this chapter. A parking study is included in the submittal with comprehensive analyses indicating adequate parking is provided for the Corepower Yoga use and Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center based on the below factors. 17.44.210 Factors to be considered A.Van pools, No van pools are proposed as part of this application. B.Bicycle and foot traffic. Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center is surrounded by the Hermosa Beach community and accessible to customers by biking or walking. C.Common parking facilities. Zoning Code Section 17.44.210 allows for parking plans and Section 17.44.220 allows for consolidated parking plans in retail centers with more than 10,000 square feet of retail space. The Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center includes 94,716 square feet of floor area, and is therefore eligible for consideration of a consolidated parking plan. A parking study has been provided, including parking demand analyses, parking utilization surveys, and shared parking analysis taking into consideration the proposed Corepower Yoga. The parking study shared parking analysis indicates that peak demand occurs on weekdays at 11:00 A.M., when 349 spaces would be occupied, providing for a surplus of 70 spaces or 16.7% of the existing parking supply; and for weekend the shared parking demand analysis forecasts a peak demand of 270 spaces at 5:00 P.M., when 270 spaces would be occupied, providing for a surplus of 149 spaces or 35.6%, following establishment of the proposed Corepower Yoga. Without a consolidated parking plan, the combined uses and parking requirements of the center would total 467 parking spaces. Utilizing the consolidated parking computation of 1 parking space per 250 square feet of retail area, the required parking for the center of 94,716 square feet is 379 parking spaces. The provision of 419 spaces exceeds the minimum requirement by 40 spaces or 10.55%. D.Varied work shifts. Yoga classes will be scheduled within the daily hours of 6:00 A.M. to 9:30 P.M., with 2-3 employees working per shift. E.Valet parking. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 7 of 9 powered by Legistar™29 Staff Report REPORT 19-0684 No valet parking is requested as part of this application. F.Unique features of the proposed uses. None noted. G.Other methods of reducing parking demand. Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center includes several tenants which customers may patronize in the same trip, including Vons Market, which is near Corepower Yoga and open during its hours of operation. The shared parking demand analysis provided in the parking study indicates the mix of uses and parking demand was at its peak on Saturday at 5:00 P.M., at which time 199 parking spaces, or 47% of the 419 center parking spaces, were occupied. H.Peak hours of the proposed use as compared with other uses sharing the same parking facilities especially in the case of small restaurants or snack shops in the downtown area or in multi-tenant buildings. Yoga classes, with up to 40 students, will be scheduled according to demand. Peak hours tend to be in early morning 7-9 A.M. and early evening 5-7 P.M. during weekdays and the morning 7 A.M.-Noon during weekends. The parking study indicates the center’s demand for parking is not at its peak during the peak business hours for the proposed Corepower Yoga. Environmental Determination: The proposed project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act as defined in Section 15301(a), Class 1 Exemption, Existing Facilities because the proposal pertains to an existing structure and involves only minor alterations to the interior of the structure, such as interior partitions or electrical and mechanical permits. Moreover, none of the exceptions to the Categorical Exemption apply nor will the project result in a significant cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place over time, or have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances, or damage a scenic highway or scenic resource within a state scenic highway. The site is not located on a hazardous waste site and will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. General Plan Consistency: The proposed establishment is located within the Gateway Commercial (GC) General Plan land use area. The Gateway Commercial designation is located at key entryways and intersections to Hermosa Beach to offer a greater variety of employment, retail and economic activity to the community. The Gateway Commercial designation also plays a role in providing services and amenities to visitors and the region by encouraging hotels and larger employment centers to be located in this area. With the Gateway Commercial designation appropriately applied to larger sites, they are intended to provide both commercial services as well as facilities that benefit the local community. The site is located within the Pacific Coast Highway Character Area. The Pacific Coast Highway corridor serves as the primary entry point into Hermosa Beach, as well as a pass-through corridor between Manhattan Beach and the Palos Verdes Peninsula. There should be a variety of commercial uses including health and fitness, retail, office, residential and auto-oriented uses along the corridor. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 8 of 9 powered by Legistar™30 Staff Report REPORT 19-0684 The proposed use implements the following PLAN Hermosa goals and policies: Community Governance policies 5.1 Residential and commercial compatibility, 5.7 Visitor and resident balance, 7.5 Health-promoting uses, 7.9 Healthy commercial products; and Land Use and Design policies 1.3 Access to daily activities, 1.5 Balance resident and visitor needs, 1.7 Compatibility of uses, 1.9 Retain commercial land area, 13.2 Social and health needs, 13.4 Private health uses, and 13.6 Connecting health and land use. Summary: Based on the analysis above, the proposed gymnasium/health and fitness center (assembly hall) use located at 1559 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 103 (Corepower Yoga), as conditioned, is consistent with the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code and PLAN Hermosa. Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolutions for amendments to CUP 19-6 and PARK 19-3, and determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Attachments: 1.Proposed Approval Resolution for CUP 2.Proposed Approval Resolution for Parking Plan 3.Traffic Study dated September 9, 2019 with Resolution P.C. 12-14 approving Parking Plan dated July 12, 2012 4.Applicant Submittal Business Narrative, Plans and Site Photos 5.Zoning Map and Aerial Photo 6.Legal Poster and Radius Map Respectfully Submitted by: Christy Teague, Senior Planner Approved: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 9 of 9 powered by Legistar™31 1 P.C. RESOLUTION 19-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP 19-6) FOR A GYMNASIUM/HEALTH AND FITNESS (ASSEMBLY HALL) USE LOCATED AT 1559 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE 103 (COREPOWER YOGA), HERMOSA BEACH, CA; AND DETERMINING THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: SECTION 1. An application was filed by Keith Glassman, GPA Inc. for “Corepower Yoga,” seeking approval of a gymnasium/health and fitness (assembly hall) use for a yoga studio located at 1559 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 103 (Corepower Yoga). SECTION 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on October 15, 2019, to consider the application for Conditional Use Permit 19-6 at which time testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. SECTION 3. The proposed project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act as defined in Section 15301(a), Class 1 Exemption, Existing Facilities because the proposal pertains to an existing structure and involves only minor alterations to the interior of the structure, such as interior partitions or electrical and mechanical permits. Moreover, none of the exceptions to the Categorical Exemption apply nor will the project result in a significant cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place over time, or have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances, or damage a scenic highway or scenic resource within a state scenic highway. The site is not located on a hazardous waste site and will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. SECTION 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 17.40.020, finding that the use as conditioned will be compatible with the surroundings and all impacts can be reduced to an insignificant level: 17.40.020 General criteria for all uses A. Distance from existing residential uses: The nearest residences and residential zone is the Commodore Condominium building (R-3 Multi-Family Residential zone) across 16th Street located approximately 60 feet from the center’s north property line behind CVS Pharmacy and Vons Market and approximately 300 feet from the Corepower Yoga tenant space. Conditions of approval are included in the resolution to reduce potential noise and vibration impacts to nearby 32 2 uses, including sound dampening mats to be located in the studio, requiring doors and windows to be closed during classes, requiring that the building be equipped with air conditioning, and requiring that noise emanating from the property complies with the City’s Noise Ordinance. Potential impacts are detailed further in Criteria I below. As conditioned, the proposed use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts to nearby residential uses. B. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking facilities, and its distance from the proposed use: The proposed yoga studio will be located in a 2,298 square foot first-floor tenant space of Building C, located at the northeast corner of the center adjacent to the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and 16th Street. Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center surface parking is adjacent to the building to the west and south of the building. A parking plan amendment is required due to changes in the existing consolidated parking plan and analysis for the proposed Corepower Yoga in Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center. A consolidated parking plan with 428 spaces was approved for PARK 12-6 by Planning Commission Resolution 12-14 on July 17, 2012. A new, comprehensive parking study has been provided for the shared parking plan for Corepower Yoga and other incremental parking changes since 2012, including modifications to provide additional ADA parking for Hermosa Fish Shop and Torrance Memorial for a net loss of 5 spaces for a current total of 423 spaces. The new consolidated parking plan includes planned changes to accommodate the installation of electric vehicle charging stations/equipment and conversion of 3 existing standard spaces to 2 ADA accessible electric vehicle parking stalls, for a net loss of 4 spaces. The new consolidated parking plan will provide 419 spaces. The parking study shared parking analysis indicates that peak demand occurs on weekdays at 11:00 A.M., when 349 spaces would be occupied, providing for a surplus of 70 spaces or 16.7% of the existing parking supply; and for weekend the shared parking demand analysis forecasts a peak demand of 270 spaces at 5:00 P.M., when 270 spaces would be occupied, providing for a surplus of 149 spaces or 35.6%, following establishment of the proposed Corepower Yoga. As conditioned, the proposed use is not anticipated to create adverse parking impacts. C. Location of and distance to churches, schools, hospitals and public playgrounds: The nearest of these types of sensitive receptors are at Valley School located approximately 1,000 feet to the west, Hermosa Valley Greenbelt Trail located across Ardmore Avenue approximately 60 feet to the west, and the Hermosa Beach Community Center located across Pier Avenue approximately 750 feet to the south of the Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center property line. Due to the distance of the gymnasium/health and fitness assembly use, the proposed use is not anticipated to have adverse effects on Valley School, Hermosa Valley Greenbelt Trail, or the Hermosa Beach Community Center. Conditions of approval have been added to the resolution to mitigate potential impacts and it is unlikely that the proposed use will affect similar sensitive receptors in the vicinity. D. The combination of uses proposed: 33 3 The 2,298 square foot tenant space will be dedicated to Corepower Yoga, a gymnasium/health and fitness center (assembly hall) yoga studio use and will not be combined with any other uses. Because the use will be located within a multi-tenant building in Hermosa Plaza, a 94,716 square foot retail center, the proposed use, as conditioned, is anticipated to have minimal impacts on the surrounding commercial or residential uses/buildings. Noise and vibration impacts and mitigations are detailed further in criteria I below, while parking is detailed in criteria B above. E. Precautions taken by the owner or operator of the proposed establishment to assure the compatibility of the use with surrounding uses: In order to assure compatibility with surrounding uses, the business owner proposes to utilize sound speakers within the studio portion of the interior only. A condition is included requiring Corepower Yoga to keep the doors and windows closed during classes when the speakers are on. Conditions are also included to limit Corepower Yoga to a maximum of 40 students during open hours (6:00 A.M and 9:30 P.M. daily) and all business operations must be contained within the tenant space. A minimum amount of equipment is necessary for yoga classes, including foam stabilizing blocks and hand weights, with foam mats to accommodate up to 40 students. These precautions are intended to minimize impacts related to noise and vibration. Conditions of approval are included to ensure these precautions are maintained throughout the life of the operation and, as conditioned, it is anticipated that the proposed establishment will be compatible with existing surrounding uses. Noise and vibration impacts are detailed further in criteria I below. F. The relationship of the proposed business-generated traffic volume and the size of streets serving the area: The proposed gymnasium/health and fitness center (assembly hall) yoga studio is within the consolidated parking plan for Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center. The business operations are limited to 2,298 square feet and class sizes of up to to 40 students. The parking requirement in the consolidated parking plan is the same as general retail parking at 1 space per 250 square feet, which is the same as the previous retail store, of 9.2 spaces for Corepower Yoga. Pacific Coast Highway is classified as a Major Arterial Street designed to carry large volumes of traffic, Pier Avenue is considered a Minor Arterial Street, along with Major Arterial Streets, are designed to carry the majority of vehicles entering, leaving, or traveling through the city, and 16th Street is considered a Local Street designed to provide connections within neighborhoods. Local streets are not intended to serve through traffic and are generally one lane each direction with lower vehicle volumes. G. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area: No exterior façade modifications are proposed with this request. Any proposed signage will require a separate sign permit application and conform to the HBMC Section 17.50 for Signs. 34 4 H. The number of similar establishments or uses within close proximity to the proposed establishment: Corepower Yoga will join at least 3 other yoga studio facilities located along or near the Pacific Coast Highway Corridor, including Lyfe Yoga Center at 1310 Pacific Coast Highway, Bikram Yoga at 518 Pier Avenue, and Beach Cities Yoga at 936 Hermosa Avenue. I. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use: The proposal for Corepower Yoga is to conduct yoga classes using limited equipment, including foam stabilizing blocks and hand weights with rubber yoga mats for up to 40 students. The proposed hours of operation are 6:00 A.M. to 9:30 P.M. The business proposes 4 wall-mounted speakers in the yoga studio portion of the tenant space to be used when the doors and windows are closed. The tenant space has existing air conditioning and ventilation, which facilitates keeping all doors and windows closed during periods of amplified sound inside the building. Conditions of approval are included in the draft resolution to ensure compatibility of the proposed use with surrounding uses, such as closing the doors when amplified sound is provided within the building, maintaining a neat and clean premises, complying with the City's Noise Ordinance, all activities must be conducted within the tenant space, and strictly prohibiting any dropping of weights. The proposed health and fitness facility (assembly hall) use, as conditioned, is not anticipated to create adverse impacts. J. Impact of the proposed use to the city’s infrastructure, and/or services: The existing building is adequately served by the various utility companies, infrastructure and municipal services, and the proposed use is not anticipated to place additional burden on current infrastructure and services. K. Will the establishment contribute to a concentration of similar outlets in the area: There are several yoga and fitness uses located within the City of Hermosa Beach, with approximately 3 yoga studio facilities located along or nearby the Pacific Coast Highway Corridor, including Lyfe Yoga Center at 1310 Pacific Coast Highway, Bikram Yoga at 518 Pier Avenue, and Beach Cities Yoga at 936 Hermosa Avenue. There are also several fitness centers located along or near the Pacific Coast Highway Corridor, including Anytime Fitness at 300 Pacific Coast Highway, Game Ready Performance at 307 Pacific Coast Highway, Poise Fitness at 428 Pacific Coast Highway, 24 Hour Fitness at 1605 Pacific Coast Highway, and Yard Training Center at 1106 Hermosa Avenue. Fitness centers are health based and community-serving businesses, which support the Hermosa Beach health-conscious beach culture and the associated goals and policies of PLAN Hermosa. Due to the size and type of the proposed business, there are no anticipated negative impacts from a concentration of yoga and other fitness-based businesses. L. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the Planning Commission, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole. The proposed application is CUP 19-6 for a gymnasium/health and fitness center (assembly hall) yoga studio at 1559 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 103 (CorePower Yoga), and an Amendment to Parking Plan 19-3 for shared consolidated parking for Hermosa 35 5 Plaza Shopping Center. The proposed resolutions for CUP 19-6 and Amendment to Parking Plan 19-3 include applicable conditions from the 2012 parking plan approvals plus new conditions. These new resolutions will supersede the previously-approved 2012 Resolution 12-14 approving a Parking Plan Amendment for all uses within the Hermosa Plaza ShoppingCenter. SECTION 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the requested Conditional Use Permit, subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. This resolution approval supersedes Resolution 12-14 for Parking Plan Amendment for all uses within the Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center. Planning Commission Resolution 12-14 is hereby superseded and shall thereafter be null and void and of no further effect. 2. The proposed project shall be substantially consistent with plans submitted and approved by the Planning Commission on October 15, 2019. Minor modifications that do not affect scale, type, location or intensity of uses or impacts thereof may be approved by the Community Development Director when not in conflict with the findings or conditions of this permit or the Municipal Code. Any substantial deviation must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. 3. The hours of operation with clients present shall be limited to between 6:00 A.M. and 9:30 P.M. daily. 4. Class sizes are limited to 40 students maximum. 5. All gymnasium/health and fitness (assembly hall) activities, which include yoga classes utilizing foam stabilizing blocks and hand weight equipment, shall be limited to the interior 2,298 square foot tenant space within the building. 6. All doors and windows shall be closed during the hours of operation when the interior speakers are on and the building shall be equipped with air conditioning. 7. Sound dampening mats shall be located under all weight equipment within the yoga studio in the gymnasium/health and fitness facility (assembly hall). 8. Weight dropping shall be strictly prohibited. 9. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's Noise Ordinance (Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Chapter 8.24) and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential neighborhoods and/or commercial establishments. 10. Management shall be responsible for maintaining noise volumes at reasonable levels. 36 6 11. All activities shall be contained on-site. No training is permitted on the sidewalks, parking lots, or in public right-of-way areas. 12. An Exit sign is required on all exit doors. 13. Fire extinguishers are required every 75 feet of interior travel distance to exits. 14. The establishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 15. A manager who is aware of the conditions of this Conditional Use Permit shall be on the premises during business hours. The Conditional Use Permit approval resolution shall be maintained on the premises in a location where employees can easily read the conditions. 16. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and maintained free of graffiti at all times. 17. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. 18. The practice of washing and rinsing floor mats, equipment, tables, etc., or discharge of any liquids, other than storm water, onto the public right-of-way, into the parking lot drain or storm drains, is strictly prohibited. Discharge of liquids or wash water shall be limited to the sanitary sewer. 19. Exterior and interior water use shall comply with Chapter 8.56. 20. The operation shall comply with all requirements of the Building, Fire and Public Works Departments. 21. The project shall maintain in conformance with all other applicable City of Hermosa Beach and regulatory agency requirements and standards, including but not limited to: California Disabled Access Standards (Government Code Title 24) and Los Angeles County National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (NPDES). 22. Approval of this permit shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval by the Planning Commission, unless significant construction or improvements or the use authorized hereby has commenced. One or more extensions of time may be requested. No extension shall be considered unless requested, in writing to the Community Development Director including the reason therefore, at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date. No additional notice of expiration will be provided. 37 7 SECTION 7. This permit shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this permit. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. To the extent permitted by law, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Hermosa Beach, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the “indemnified parties”) from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void any permit or approval for this project authorized by the City, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorney’s fees and costs in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this permit. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this permit and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. SECTION 8. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CERTIFICATION 38 8 I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 19--XX is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their adjourned regular meeting of October 15, 2019. ___________________________ ____________________________ David Pedersen, Chair Ken Robertson, Secretary October 15, 2019 Date 39 Page 1 – PARK 19-3 P.C. RESOLUTION 19-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PARKING PLAN AMENDMENT ALLOWING ALL USES WITHIN THE HERMOSA PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER (PARK 19-3) INCLUDING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP 19-6) FOR A GYMNASIUM/HEALTH AND FITNESS (ASSEMBLY HALL) USE LOCATED AT 1559 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY SUITE 103 (COREPOWER YOGA) WITH 2,298 SQUARE FEET, TO BE CALCULATED BASED ON A CONSOLIDATED OFF-STREET PARKING SANDARD, AND SUPERCEDING APPROVAL OF A PARKING PLAN AMENDMENT AS SET FORTH IN PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 12-14, , LOCATED AT 1559 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND 705 PIER AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 1, TRACT 9203, AND LOTS 11-18 INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 80, SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, HERMOSA BEACH, CA; AND DETERMINING THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Keith Glassman, GPA Inc. for “Corepower Yoga,” seeking approval of a gymnasium/health and fitness (assembly hall) use for a yoga studio located at 1559 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 103 (Corepower Yoga). Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on October 15, 2019, to consider the application for Amendment to Parking Plan (PARK 19-3) in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit 19-6 (CUP 19-6) for a gymnasium/health and fitness (assembly hall) use for a yoga studio located at 1559 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 103 (Corepower Yoga) at which time testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. The proposed project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act as defined in Section 15301(a), Class 1 Exemption, Existing Facilities because the proposal pertains to an existing structure and involves only minor alterations to the interior of the structure, such as interior partitions or electrical and mechanical permits. Moreover, none of the exceptions to the Categorical Exemption apply nor will the project result in a significant cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place over time, or have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances, or damage a scenic highway or scenic resource within a state scenic highway. The site is not located on a hazardous waste site and will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. 40 Page 2 – PARK 19-3 Section 4. Based on the testimony and evidence received, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 17.44.210 and Section 17.44.220 pertaining to the application for a Parking Plan amendment: Parking Plan Criteria, Conditions and Standards HBMC Section 17.44.210 and 17.44.220 state that a parking plan may be approved by the Planning Commission to allow for a reduction in the number of spaces required and that a consolidated plan may require parking spaces for various uses be reduced in number and computed at one space per two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area when parking is consolidated in retail shopping centers over ten thousand (10,000) square feet in size. The applicant shall provide the information necessary to show that adequate parking will be provided for customers, clients, visitors and employees or when located in a vehicle parking district, the applicant shall propose an in-lieu fee according to requirements of this chapter. A parking study is included in the submittal with comprehensive analyses indicating adequate parking is provided for the Corepower Yoga use and Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center based on the below factors. 17.44.210 Factors to be considered A. Van pools, No van pools are proposed as part of this application. B. Bicycle and foot traffic. Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center is surrounded by the Hermosa Beach community and accessible to customers by biking or walking. C. Common parking facilities. Zoning Code Section 17.44.210 allows for parking plans and Section 17.44.220 allows for consolidated parking plans in retail centers with more than 10,000 square feet of retail space. The Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center includes 94,716 square feet of floor area, and is therefore eligible for consideration of a consolidated parking plan. A parking study has been provided, including parking demand analyses, parking utilization surveys, and shared parking analysis taking into consideration the proposed Corepower Yoga. The parking study shared parking analysis indicates that peak demand occurs on weekdays at 11:00 A.M., when 349 spaces would be occupied, providing for a surplus of 70 spaces or 16.7% of the existing parking supply; and for weekend the shared parking demand analysis forecasts a peak demand of 270 spaces at 5:00 P.M., when 270 spaces would be occupied, providing for a surplus of 149 spaces or 35.6%, following establishment of the proposed Corepower Yoga. Without a consolidated parking plan, the combined uses and parking requirements of the center would total 467 parking spaces. Utilizing the consolidated parking computation of 1 parking space per 250 square feet of retail area, the required parking for the center of 94,716 square feet is 379 parking spaces. The provision of 419 spaces exceeds the minimum requirement by 40 spaces or 10.55%. D. Varied work shifts. Yoga classes will be scheduled within the daily hours of 6:00 A.M. to 9:30 P.M., with 2-3 employees working per shift. 41 Page 3 – PARK 19-3 E. Valet parking. No valet parking is requested as part of this application. F. Unique features of the proposed uses. None noted. G. Other methods of reducing parking demand. Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center includes several tenants which customers may patronize during the same trip, including Vons Market, which is near Corepower Yoga and open during its hours of operation. The shared parking demand analysis provided in the parking study indicates the mix of uses and parking demand was at its peak on Saturday at 5:00 P.M., at which time 199 parking spaces, or 47% of the 419 center parking spaces, were occupied. H. Peak hours of the proposed use as compared with other uses sharing the same parking facilities especially in the case of small restaurants or snack shops in the downtown area or in multi-tenant buildings. Yoga classes, with up to 40 students, will be scheduled according to demand. Peak hours tend to be in early morning 7-9 A.M. and early evening 5-7 P.M. during weekdays and the morning 7 A.M.-Noon during weekends. The parking study indicates the center’s demand for parking is not at its peak during the peak business hours for the proposed Corepower Yoga. The parking study indicates the center’s demand for parking is not at its peak during the peak business hours for the proposed Corepower Yoga. Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the proposed Parking Plan amendment 19-4 subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. This resolution approval supersedes Resolution 12-14 for Parking Plan Amendment for all uses within the Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center. Planning Commission Resolution 12-14 is hereby superseded and shall thereafter be null and void and of no further effect. 2. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans and parking study, received and reviewed by the Commission at its meeting of October 15, 2019. Minor modifications shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. 3. The current mix of commercial uses shall be maintained within the Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center. Any modifications to uses and occupancies within the Shopping Center that result in a greater parking demand than anticipated in the parking study shall require further amendment to the Parking Plan. 4. A minimum of 419 parking spaces shall be provided in the Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center parking lots and striped in compliance with Chapter 17.44 (Off-Street Parking) and accessibility requirements. 42 Page 4 – PARK 19-3 5. All parking available on the property shall be maintained for use by employees and customers and shared among all tenants and occupancies on the property, and shall be accessible to all uses. Any posted signs or restrictions regarding use of the parking on the property shall permit parking in all spaces for customers of the Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center. 6. Parking spaces in the Hermosa Plaza Shopping Center shall continue to be offered free of charge, or by validation to customers of the shopping center for at least two hours. 7. If a review of this Parking Plan occurs, the Planning Commission may amend the above conditions and/or impose any new conditions deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental impacts on the environment or neighborhood arising from use on the premise. 8. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this permit and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation hereafter adopted that is applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. 9. Approval of this permit shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval by the Planning Commission, unless significant construction or improvements or the use authorized hereby and by the Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan have commenced. One or more extensions of time may be requested. No extension shall be considered unless requested in writing to the Community Development Director, including the reason therefore, at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date. No additional notice of expiration will be provided. Section 6. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this permit. The Parking Plan amendment shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. To the extent permitted by law, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Hermosa Beach, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the “indemnified parties”) from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void any permit or approval for this project authorized by the City, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorney’s fees and costs in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. 43 Page 5 – PARK 19-3 The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this permit. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. Section 7. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the final decision on this Parking Plan (either by the Planning Commission, or the City Council should they take jurisdiction of the project), must be made within 90 days after the final decision. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. No. 19-X is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at its regular meeting of October 15, 2019. ______________________________ ______________________________ David Pedersen, Chair Ken Robertson, Secretary October 15, 2019 Date 44 MEMORANDUM O:\0437\memo\0437-M6.docx To: Jimmy Chung Regency Centers Date: September 9, 2019 From: David S. Shender, P.E. Jason A. Shender Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers LLG Ref: 5-18-0437-1 Subject: Plaza Hermosa Parking Study 703-719 Pier Avenue, City of Hermosa Beach This parking demand analysis has been prepared for the Plaza Hermosa shopping center (the “Center”) located at 703-719 Pier Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beach. The Center is a multi-tenant shopping center located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Ardmore Avenue and Pier Avenue intersection, just west of Pacific Coast Highway. Figure 1 shows the Center’s location within the general vicinity. The parking analysis has been prepared to assess the adequacy of the parking supply to satisfy the forecast peak shared parking demand at the Center with the proposed project. It is noted that there is an existing parking plan for the Center which allows for consolidated parking. The existing consolidated parking plan for the center, Parking Plan 12-6 (PARK 12-6) was approved by the City’s Planning Commission in Resolution P.C. 12-14 (the “Resolution”) on July 12, 2012. The approved Resolution is provided in Appendix A. Project Description The Center is located at 703-719 Pier Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beach. The Center is bordered by 16th Street to the north, Pier Avenue to the south, and Ardmore Avenue to the east, and Pacific Coast Highway to the east. The Center consists of a mix of uses, including restaurant, retail, and medical office uses. The Center currently provides 423 parking spaces. The Center provides approximately 94,716 square feet of commercial floor area. Specifically, the Center consists of 75,578 square feet of retail floor area, 13,488 square feet of medical office floor area, and 5,650 square feet of restaurant floor area. It is noted that 6,776 square feet of the 75,578 square feet of retail floor area is currently vacant (previously occupied by Aaron Brothers). The applicant proposes to remove the existing Kriser’s Feeding Pets for Life pet store, which provides 2,293 square feet of floor area, and re-occupy it with a CorePower Yoga studio. Additionally, the applicant proposes to reoccupy the existing vacant floor area with a fitness use (the “Project”). The existing tenant spaces are proposed to be remodeled to accommodate the future uses. 45 Jimmy Chung September 9, 2019 Page 2 O:\0437\memo\0437-M6.docx Additionally, modifications to the lower parking level are proposed as part of the Project to accommodate the installation of electric vehicle charging stations and support equipment. Specifically, three existing parking stalls will be removed to support the charging equipment, and one existing parking stall would be removed as part of the proposed conversion of three existing standard parking stalls to two ADA accessible electric vehicle parking stalls. Following the proposed modifications, a total of 419 parking spaces will be provided at the Center as a result of the Project. Figure 2 provides the Center’s site plan. It is noted that PARK 12-6 states the Center provides 428 parking spaces, including 10 spaces in the lower parking level which are contractually obligated under a long-term lease by the Center owner to an adjacent off-site use, Time Warner Cable. However, there have been changes to the Center’s parking supply since the approval of PARK 12-6, including the termination of the Time Warner Cable parking agreement in a letter dated May 22, 2012. The termination letter is contained in Appendix B. Additionally, Hermosa Fish Shop, which currently occupies Unit PADE, was previously occupied by another restaurant, The Counter, which provided an additional two parking spaces. When Hermosa Fish Shop reoccupied this tenant space, the parking two spaces were lost, bringing the total parking supply to 426 spaces. Additionally, when Torrance Memorial Physician Network occupied Unit H18, the parking lot was restriped to provide an additional three ADA parking spaces. In order to accommodate the ADA spaces, three standard parking spaces were lost. Furthermore, four more parking spaces will be removed as a result of the proposed electric vehicle charging stations in the lower parking level to meet California Green Building requirements. Following the proposed modifications, a total of 419 parking spaces will be provided at the Center. It should be noted that this analysis does not include the Chipotle Mexican Grill and Union Bank, as well as their associated parking areas. These uses are adjacent to the Center and are under separate ownership. 46 Jimmy Chung September 9, 2019 Page 3 O:\0437\memo\0437-M6.docx City Code Parking Requirements Section 17.44.030 of the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code provides the following parking rates applicable to the Center: • General Retail: 1 space per 250 square feet of floor area; • Restaurant (Sit-Down): 1 space per 100 square feet of floor area; • Medical Office: 1 space per 200 square feet of floor area; • Health and Fitness Center 1: 1 space per 200 square feet of floor area; and • Health and Fitness Center2: 1 space per 100 square feet of floor area. Table 1 provides a summary of the on-site parking requirements for the Center’s existing uses per the Municipal Code. As shown on Table 1, the site provides a total of 94,716 square feet of floor area. Application of the Municipal Code parking rate yields a current parking requirement for approximately 426 parking spaces, as shown on Table 1. This exceeds the current parking supply of 423 spaces at the Center. Per the Municipal Code, a potential shortage of three spaces is calculated for the existing Center. Table 1 also provides a summary of the on-site parking requirements for the Project per the Municipal Code. As shown on Table 1, the Project is forecast to yield a total parking requirement of 467 parking spaces with the proposed change in land uses. The required parking supply would also exceed proposed parking supply of 419 spaces at the Center. It should be noted that the Municipal Code requirements represent the sum of the peak parking requirements for each individual land use and does not take into account the shared parking concept (i.e., the hourly and/or day of the week variations in the parking demand generated by individual land uses) or the synergy and mix of land uses, which results in a lower overall parking demand at the site. For example, restaurants typically generate peak parking demand on weekends while medical office uses have a peak weekday parking utilization. Thus, a parking space on a weekday by an office employee can be “shared” with a restaurant patron on a weekend day. 1 Health and Fitness Center rate of 1 space per 200 square feet assumes classes at the proposed CorePower Yoga studio will be limited to a maximum of 40 students. 2 Health and Fitness Center rate of 1 space per 100 square feet applies to spaces greater than 6,000 square feet of floor area. 47 Jimmy Chung September 9, 2019 Page 4 O:\0437\memo\0437-M6.docx While the Municipal Code requirements indicate a potential shortage of parking spaces at full occupancy, the mixed-use nature and tenant mix at the Center allows for an actual parking demand that is significantly below the Municipal Code requirements. Therefore, a shared parking demand analysis was conducted to address the adequacy of the parking supply for the Center, assuming full occupancy of the Center under future conditions involving the Project. Parking Demand Analysis Parking Utilization Surveys The first step in preparing the parking demand analysis is to document the current utilization at the site. Parking utilization counts were conducted at the existing Center for purposes of assessing the existing parking demand characteristics. Hourly counts of parking utilization were conducted on Friday, November 16, 2018 and Saturday, November 17, 2018, beginning at 6:00 AM, with the last count made at 8:00 PM. The parking count data collected at the site is summarized in the “Existing Occupied” column provided in Table 2 for weekday conditions and in Table 3 for weekend conditions. As shown in Table 2, during the Friday survey day, the highest demand for parking occurred at 11:00 AM, when 349 of the Center’s 423 parking spaces were occupied. Table 3 shows that peak demand on the Saturday survey day occurred at 5:00 PM, when 270 parking spaces were occupied. Shared Parking Analysis The concept of shared parking is widely recognized within the transportation planning industry and accounts for the changes in parking demand over time for different types of land uses within a multi-use project. Shared parking analyses are used to determine the peak parking demand for a combination of uses that may share parking spaces (i.e., retail, medical offices, health club/fitness, and restaurant uses). Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, 2005 published by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) provides guidance for purposes of preparing parking demand evaluations. The ULI document provides hour-by-hour parking demand indices – for both weekdays and weekends – for a variety of land uses (including those found at the Center), derived from actual field parking counts conducted at existing developments. The parking utilization surveys conducted at the Center provide the actual existing parking demand generated by the existing uses at the Center. To forecast future parking demand at the site, the ULI hourly parking demand factors were applied to the highest parking demand forecast for the land use change of the Project based on the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Parking requirements per land use. 48 Jimmy Chung September 9, 2019 Page 5 O:\0437\memo\0437-M6.docx Specifically, the following summarizes the methodology for forecasting future parking demand at the site following implementation of the Project: • Utilize the parking utilization survey data to determine parking demand related to the existing and occupied land uses at the Center; • Estimate the parking demand to be removed related to the Project (proposed conversion of the existing pet store tenant to yoga studio and re-occupancy of the prior Aaron Brothers by a fitness center use) through application of the hourly ULI shared parking demand factors; and • Estimate the additional parking demand at the Center related to the proposed yoga studio and fitness use to be provided through application of the hourly and weekday/weekend ULI shared parking demand factors. Table 2 indicates that following completion and occupancy of the Project, the weekday peak parking demand at the Center is forecast to occur at 11:00 AM, when 349 parking spaces would be occupied. When compared to the proposed supply of 419 spaces, a surplus of 70 spaces is expected. This represents a forecast surplus of parking equal to approximately 16.7% of the total proposed parking supply. Table 3 demonstrates that the weekend day peak parking demand will occur at 5:00 PM, when 270 spaces would be occupied, yielding a forecast surplus of 149 unused parking spaces at this hour. This represents a forecast surplus of parking equal to approximately 35.6% of the total proposed parking supply. Consolidated Parking Plan Per Section 17.44.220 of the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, a consolidated parking plan may be approved by the Planning Commission to allow for parking to be calculated at a standard rate of one space per 250 square feet for all uses within a shopping center. This would be in lieu of the current requirement at the Center of calculating parking separately for individual tenants based on applicable parking rates in the Municipal Code. The property owner must provide information to show that adequate parking will be provided for at the subject property. Factors taken into consideration include common parking facilities, peak hours of the proposed use as compared with other uses sharing the same parking facilities, especially in the case of multi-tenant buildings. 49 Jimmy Chung September 9, 2019 Page 6 O:\0437\memo\0437-M6.docx Application of the consolidated parking plan rate of one space per 250 square feet of gross floor area would result in the requirement for 379 parking spaces at the Center (based on 94,716 square feet of floor area). The 379-space requirement under the consolidated parking rate is readily satisfied by the 423 parking spaces provided on- site at the Center. As documented herein, the actual parking demand at the Center is well below the required parking under the consolidated parking plan rate (i.e., a peak existing demand of 305 spaces under existing conditions and a forecast peak parking demand for 349 spaces following implementation of the Project). As mentioned above, PARK 12-6 was approved for the Center by the City’s Planning Commission on July 12, 2012. Based on the above, required parking at the Center should be considered to be calculated under the consolidated parking plan rate of one space per 250 square feet. Table 4 provides a summary of the on-site parking requirements for the Center’s existing uses per PARK 12-6. As shown on Table 4, the site provides a total of 94,716 square feet of floor area. No changes to the Center’s floor area are proposed as part of the project. Application of the PARK 12-6 parking ratio of 1 space per 250 square feet for the entire Center yields a current parking requirement for approximately 379 parking spaces, as shown on Table 4. This is readily satisfied by the proposed supply of 419 parking spaces at the Center. Summary The following provides a summary of the parking demand analysis prepared for the Plaza Hermosa shopping center at 703-719 Pier Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beach based on implementation of the proposed Project: • The Project consists of converting a pet store to a yoga studio within the Plaza Hermosa shopping center. In addition, the prior Aaron Brothers space is proposed to be occupied by a fitness use. Furthermore, four parking spaces are proposed to be removed to install electric vehicle charging stations in the lower parking level to meet California Green Building requirements. As a result, a total of 419 parking spaces will be provided at the Center. • Implementation of the Project yields an overall parking requirement for the Center of 467 parking spaces per the Municipal Code. Based on the proposed parking supply of 419 parking spaces, a potential deficiency of 48 spaces based on strict application of the Municipal Code. 50 Jimmy Chung September 9, 2019 Page 7 O:\0437\memo\0437-M6.docx  Although the Municipal Code parking calculations indicate a potential deficiency of parking spaces following implementation of the Project, the mixed-use nature and tenant mix at the site allow for an actual parking demand that is significantly below the Municipal Code requirements. Therefore, a parking demand analysis was prepared for the Center utilizing existing parking demand data, supplemented with forecast parking utilization based on the ULI shared parking principles.  Based on the shared parking analysis, the peak parking demand for weekdays at the Center is forecast to occur at 11:00 AM, when 349 spaces would be occupied following implementation of the Project. When compared to the proposed supply of 419 parking spaces, this represents a forecast surplus of approximately 16.7% of the existing parking supply.  For weekend days, the shared parking demand analysis forecasts a peak demand of 270 spaces at 5:00 PM following implementation of the Project. When compared to the proposed supply of 419 parking spaces, this represents a forecast surplus of approximately 35.6.% of the existing parking supply.  Based on existing parking utilization at the Center, as well as well as the parking demand forecast related to the Project utilizing the shared parking concept, the proposed parking supply is expected to adequately accommodate the future peak parking demand at the Plaza Hermosa shopping center.  The Municipal Code allows for property owners to apply for a consolidated parking plan, subject to approval by the City’s planning commission. The applicant must show that adequate parking will be provided within the subject property. An existing consolidated parking plan for the center, Parking Plan 12-6 (PARK 12-6) was approved by the City’s Planning Commission in Resolution P.C. 12-14 on July 12, 2012. Application of the consolidated parking plan rate of one space per 250 square feet of building floor area would result in the requirement for 379 parking spaces at the Center, which is readily satisfied by the current on-site parking supply. Further, the actual parking demand at the Center as documented herein is well below the calculated parking requirement under the consolidated parking plan rate. cc: File 51 52 FIGURE 2SITE PLANPLAZA HERMOSA PARKING STUDYMAP SOURCE: REGENCY CENTERSLINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineersN53 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 5-18-0437-1 Plaza Hermosa Parking Study 13-Dec-18 Spaces Tenant Use Size (GSF)Required A3 Vons General Retail 36,800 1 /250 sf 147.2 B2 CVS General Retail 17,502 1 /250 sf 70.0 C4 Hermosa Smiles Dentistry Medical Office 3,360 1 /200 sf 16.8 C5 Kriser's Feeding Pets for Life General Retail 2,293 1 /250 sf 9.2 C6 Nail Garden General Retail 2,277 1 /250 sf 9.1 CF Aaron Brothers (Vacant)General Retail 6,776 1 /250 sf 27.1 H11 Nekter Juice Bar Restaurant (Sit-Down)1,087 1 /100 sf 10.9 H12 Hermosa Beauty Center General Retail 1,264 1 /250 sf 5.1 H14 AT&T General Retail 2,444 1 /250 sf 9.8 H15 Robert S. Kapust, O.D.Medical Office 1,222 1 /200 sf 6.1 H16 The UPS Store General Retail 1,222 1 /250 sf 4.9 H17 Pick Up Stix Restaurant (Sit-Down)1,726 1 /100 sf 17.3 H18 Torrance Memorial Physician Network Medical Office 8,906 1 /200 sf 44.5 PADD Wells Fargo General Retail 5,000 1 /250 sf 20.0 PADE Hermosa Fish Shop Restaurant (Sit-Down)2,837 1 /100 sf 28.4 94,716 426.3 C5 Kriser's Feeding Pets for Life (To Be Removed)General Retail (2,293) 1 /250 sf -9.2 C5 Corepower Yoga (To Be Added)Health and Fitness Center [2]2,293 1 /200 sf 11.5 CF Vacant Aaron Brothers (To Be Removed)General Retail (6,776) 1 /250 sf -27.1 CF Fitness Center (To Be Added)Health and Fitness Center 6,776 1 /100 sf 67.8 -40.7 94,716 466.9 [1]Source: City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. [2]Assumes classes will be limited to 40 students. Proposed Plaza Hermosa Proposed Changes (Future) Plaza Hermosa Total Parking (Future) Unit Plaza Hermosa Total Parking (Existing) Parking Ratio Existing Table 1EXISTING AND PROPOSED TENANTS AND CODE PARKING ANALYSIS [1]Plaza Hermosa Shopping Center Current Code 54 Table 2WEEKDAY (FRIDAY) SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]PLAZA HERMOSA SHOPPING CENTER703-719 PIER AVENUE, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHLand UseSize -2.293 KSF [4] 2.293 KSF 6.776 KSF [5]Code Pkg Rate [2] 4.0 /KSF 5.0 /KSF 10.0 /KSFGross Spaces -9 Spc. 11 Spc. 68 Spc. Shared 419 Spaces [6]ParkingTime of DayDemand6:00 AM6508481217:00 AM10805291428:00 AM154(2)5291869:00 AM227(4)84827910:00 AM272(7)84832111:00 AM294(8)95434912:00 PM305(9)7413441:00 PM295(9)8483422:00 PM294(9)8483413:00 PM282(8)8483304:00 PM279(8)9543345:00 PM234(9)10622976:00 PM205(9)11682757:00 PM161(9)10612238:00 PM116(8)953170Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.[2] Parking rates based on Code parking ratios of 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet for pet store use, 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet for yoga studio use, 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet for yoga studio use, and 10 spaces per 1,000 square feet for fitness center use.[3] Parking counts conducted on Friday, November 16, 2018 by the Traffic Solution.[4] Existing pet store space of 2,293 square feet to be converted to a yoga studio use.[5] Existing vacant retail space of 6,776 square feet to be converted to a fitness use.[6] Parking spaces proposed provided on site (419).196249Comparison w/Parking SupplySurplus(Deficiency)7029827723314098Number ofSpacesNumber ofSpaces7577788985122144Existing Occupied 88,040 GSFExisting Pet Store (to be converted)Observed Hourly Parking Demand [3]Future Yoga Studio Future Fitness UseNumber ofSpacesLINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineersLLG Ref. 5-18-0437-1Plaza Hermosa Parking Study55 WEEKEND (SATURDAY) SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]PLAZA HERMOSA SHOPPING CENTER703-719 PIER AVENUE, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHLand UseSize-2.293 KSF [4]2.293 KSF6.776 KSF [5]Comparison w/Code Pkg Rate [2]4.0 /KSF5.0 /KSF10.0 /KSFParking SupplyGross Spaces-9 Spc.11 Spc.68 Spc. Shared419 Spaces [6]Number ofNumber ofParkingSurplusTime of DaySpacesSpacesDemand(Deficiency)6:00 AM3809541013187:00 AM7005311063138:00 AM90(2)4251173029:00 AM141(4)63517824110:00 AM208(6)42523118811:00 AM217(7)63525116812:00 PM223(8)6352561631:00 PM240(8)3222571622:00 PM226(9)3182381813:00 PM236(9)3222521674:00 PM197(9)6382321875:00 PM199(8)11682701496:00 PM182(8)10652491707:00 PM144(7)7411852348:00 PM118(7)322136283Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.[2] Parking rates based on Code parking ratios of 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet for pet store use, 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet for yoga studio use, 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet for yoga studio use, and 10 spaces per 1,000 square feet for fitness center use.[3] Parking counts conducted on Satuday, November 17, 2018 by the Traffic Solution.[4] Existing pet store space of 2,293 square feet to be converted to a yoga studio use.[5] Existing vacant retail space of 6,776 square feet to be converted to a fitness use.[6] Parking spaces proposed provided on site (419).Observed Hourly Parking Demand [3]Existing Pet Store (to be converted)Future Yoga StudioTABLE 3SpacesExisting Occupied 88,040 GSFFuture Fitness UseNumber ofLINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineersLLG Ref. 5-18-0437-1Plaza Hermosa Parking Study56 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 5-18-0437-1 Plaza Hermosa Parking Study 10-Jul-19 Spaces Tenant Use Size (GSF)Required A3 Vons General Retail 36,800 1 /250 sf 147.2 B2 CVS General Retail 17,502 1 /250 sf 70.0 C4 Hermosa Smiles Dentistry Medical Office 3,360 1 /250 sf 13.4 C5 Kriser's Feeding Pets for Life General Retail 2,293 1 /250 sf 9.2 C6 Nail Garden General Retail 2,277 1 /250 sf 9.1 CF Aaron Brothers (Vacant)General Retail 6,776 1 /250 sf 27.1 H11 Nekter Juice Bar Restaurant (Sit-Down)1,087 1 /250 sf 4.3 H12 Hermosa Beauty Center General Retail 1,264 1 /250 sf 5.1 H14 AT&T General Retail 2,444 1 /250 sf 9.8 H15 Robert S. Kapust, O.D.Medical Office 1,222 1 /250 sf 4.9 H16 The UPS Store General Retail 1,222 1 /250 sf 4.9 H17 Pick Up Stix Restaurant (Sit-Down)1,726 1 /250 sf 6.9 H18 Torrance Memorial Physician Network Medical Office 8,906 1 /250 sf 35.6 PADD Wells Fargo General Retail 5,000 1 /250 sf 20.0 PADE Hermosa Fish Shop Restaurant (Sit-Down)2,837 1 /250 sf 11.3 94,716 378.9 C5 Kriser's Feeding Pets for Life (To Be Removed)General Retail (2,293) 1 /250 sf -9.2 C5 Corepower Yoga (To Be Added)Health and Fitness Center [2]2,293 1 /250 sf 9.2 CF Vacant Aaron Brothers (To Be Removed)General Retail (6,776) 1 /250 sf -27.1 CF Fitness Center (To Be Added)Health and Fitness Center 6,776 1 /250 sf 27.1 -0.0 94,716 378.9 [1]The City of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission approved a consolidated parking plan (PARK 12-6) on July 12, 2012, allowing the Center to park at a ration of 1/ 250 sf. [2]Assumes classes will be limited to 40 students. Existing Table 4EXISTING AND PROPOSED TENANTS AND PARK 12-6 PARKING ANALYSIS [1]Plaza Hermosa Shopping Center Current Code Proposed Plaza Hermosa Proposed Changes (Future) Plaza Hermosa Total Parking (Future) Unit Plaza Hermosa Total Parking (Existing) Parking Ratio 57 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 5-18-0437-1 Plaza Hermosa Parking Study O:\0437\memo\0437-Appendix Covers.docx APPENDIX A CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESOLUTION P.C. 12-14 58 1 P.C. RESOLUTION 12-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PARKING PLAN AMENDMENT ALLOWING PARKING FOR ALL USES WITHIN THE PLAZA HERMOSA SHOPPING CENTER, INCLUDING A MEDICAL/DENTAL USE AT 1559 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND A FITNESS/SPA USE EXCEEDING 3,000 SQUARE FEET AT 705 PIER AVENUE, TO BE CALCULATED BASED ON A CONSOLIDATED OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARD, AND SUPERSEDING APPROVAL OF A PARKING PLAN AMENDMENT AS SET FORTH IN PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 11-4, LOCATED AT 1559 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND 705 PIER AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 1, TRACT 9203, AND LOTS 11-18 INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 80, SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Section 1. An application was filed by Regency Centers seeking to establish a medical/dental use and spa and fitness use within the Plaza Hermosa Shopping Center thereby requiring an amendment to the Parking Plan for the Shopping Center, pursuant to Section 17.44.220 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application to amend the Parking Plan (PARK 12-6) on July 17, 2012, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, both written and verbal, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. Section 17.44.220 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Consolidated Off-Street Parking, allows the Planning Commission to reduce the required parking for each individual use and base the parking requirement on one space per 250 square feet when parking is consolidated in retail shopping centers of over 10,000 square feet, subject to approval of a Parking Plan. 2. Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution 11-4 approving a Parking Plan amendment, Plaza Hermosa Shopping Center contained 94,552 square feet of various commercial uses, including outdoor dining, served by a parking area containing 428 parking spaces, provided that 10 parking spaces are reserved for an off-site use, yielding a ratio greater than one space per 250 square feet based on the consolidated parking standard. 3. There are currently 428 spaces in the shopping center; however, 10 parking spaces in the lower parking level are contractually obligated under a long term lease by the shopping center owner to an adjacent off-site use (Time Warner Cable). Therefore, 418 spaces are presently available for all uses. The proposed uses require 378 parking spaces, yielding a parking ratio greater than one space per 250 square feet of floor area compliant with Section 17.44.220. 4. The parking characteristics and peak hour parking demand of all uses were evaluated via a shared parking analysis prepared by Linscott Law and Greenspan dated July 6, 2012 updating an earlier analysis dated December 29, 2010. The updated parking analysis incorporates the following proposed changes to the tenant mix at the Plaza Hermosa Shopping Center: 59 2 • Replacement of the Club 705 restaurant/nightclub use (tenant space H18 on the site plan provided in the December 2010 parking letter) with a Total Woman Gym & Spa use, maintaining the existing floor area of 8,963 square feet; • Relocation of the existing Aaron Brothers tenant from tenant space C4 (7,990 square feet) to tenant space CF (6,776 square feet), which was previously vacant; and • Establishment of a dentist office (3,660 square feet) in a portion of tenant space C4, with the remainder of the floor area to be devoted to retail uses. The shared parking analysis concludes that based on a conservative forecast of future peak parking demand for the Center, the current parking supply will adequately accommodate the parking demand generated by full occupancy of the Center during the weekday and weekend conditions. It is projected that with full occupancy of the Center, including the conversion of the Club 705 space to a Total Woman Gym & Spa, as well as occupancy of the new dentist office, the Center is expected to have a peak parking demand for 286 parking spaces during the weekday and 268 parking spaces during a weekend day while 418 spaces are available for public use and parking supply is adequate for all uses. 5. There is no charge for parking in the Plaza Hermosa Shopping Center, and the existing Parking Plan for the shopping center does not restrict the charging of parking fees. In cases where parking fees were charged for onsite parking at a commercial building housing multiple tenants, including a large health and fitness use, customers parked outside of the onsite parking structure, consumed onstreet parking causing adverse impacts. There is a limited supply of onstreet parking on Pier Avenue and in the surrounding areas which could be adversely affected if consumed by uses in the shopping center. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application to amend the Parking Plan: 1. The modified parking demands can be absorbed in the parking facility with 428 spaces, of which 418 are available for all uses at the shopping center; 2. The shopping center shall maintain 428 parking spaces, which exceeds the required minimum ratio of one space per 250 square feet of gross floor area as required by Section 17.44.220; provided that no more than ten (10) spaces may be reserved for any off-site use; 3. Calculating parking requirements for the proposed use within a large shopping center at one per 250 square feet rather than cumulatively according to the required parking standards for each and every use complies with Section 17.44.220, Consolidated Off-Street Parking, because the shopping center contains a mix of uses with varying peak parking demand times, and the proposed spa/fitness and medical/dental uses exhibit peak demand offset from the parking demand of other uses. 4. To reduce the potential for adverse impacts to on-street parking in the surrounding area parking spaces in the shopping center must continue to be offered free of charge or by validation to customers of the shopping center, for at least two hours and signage must be provided in the spa/fitness use at 705 Pier Avenue advising customers to park on the lower level of the Plaza Hermosa parking structure. 5. The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15303(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act because it involves a minor alteration within an urbanized area with availability of services. 60 3 Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Parking Plan amendment, subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans received and reviewed by the Commission at its meeting of July 17, 2012. Minor modifications shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. 2. The current mix of commercial uses shall be maintained within the shopping center. Any modifications to uses and occupancies within the Shopping Center that result in a greater parking demand shall require further amendment to the Parking Plan. 3. A minimum of 428 parking spaces shall be provided in the shopping center parking lots and striped in compliance with Chapter 17.44 (Off-Street Parking) and accessibility requirements. 4. All parking available on the property shall be maintained for use by employees and customers and shared among all tenants and occupancies on the property, and shall be accessible to all uses. Any posted signs or restrictions regarding use of the parking on the property shall permit parking in all spaces for customers of the shopping center. However, a maximum of ten (10) spaces in the lower parking level may be reserved for off-site uses. 5. Parking spaces in the shopping center shall continue to be offered free of charge, or by validation to customers of the shopping center for at least two hours. Signage shall be provided in the spa/fitness use at 705 Pier Avenue advising customers to park on the lower level of the Plaza Hermosa parking structure. 6. Planning Commission Resolution 11-4 is hereby superseded and shall thereafter be null and void and of no further effect. 7. If a review of this Parking Plan occurs, the Planning Commission may amend the above conditions and/or impose any new conditions deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental impacts on the environment or neighborhood arising from use of the premise. 8. Approval of this permit shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval by the Planning Commission, unless significant construction or improvements or the use authorized hereby has commenced. One or more extensions of time may be requested. No extension shall be considered unless requested, in writing to the Community Development Director including the reason therefore, at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date. No additional notice of expiration will be provided. Section 6. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Parking Plan shall be recorded and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the City of Hermosa Beach. Each of the above conditions is separately enforceable and, if one of the conditions is found unenforceable by a court of law, all other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. The Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Hermosa Beach and its agents, 61 62 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 5-18-0437-1 Plaza Hermosa Parking Study O:\0437\memo\0437-Appendix Covers.docx APPENDIX B TIME WARNER CABLE PARKING AGREEMENT TERMINATION LETTER 63 64 Project Narrative Proposed use: Core Power Yoga Proposed floor area: 2,298 sq. ft. Employees per shift: 2-3 Students per class – 40 per class Hours: 6:00 AM to 9:30 PM. 7 days/wk Peak Hours: Peak hours tend to be early morning 7-9 A.M. and early evening 5-7 P.M. during weekdays, and the morning 7 A.M.-Noon on Saturdays and Sundays. Services: Yoga Classes – Drawing from many different styles, CPY’s classes encompass a wide variety of asanas, or poses, and are taught by certified yoga instructors. Core Power Yoga (CPY) is requesting consideration & approval for a change in use from an existing retail Pet Store to Core Power Yoga Studio. The proposed yoga studio use will be complementary to the existing shopping center and offer convenient access to the community. The enclosed Plaza Hermosa Parking Study assesses the adequate parking with the development standards for the zone with favorable results. CPY is requesting consideration and approval of the proposed project because of the unique timing and location opportunity to provide a service to the community and show the incredible life-changing things that happen when you root an intensely physical workout in the mindfulness of yoga. 65 960 atlant ic avenueA l a m e d a , C A 9 4 5 0 15 1 0 8 6 5 8 6 6 3m b h a r c h . c o mConsultantSealDrawing TitleProject No.ScaleDrawing No.QAQCCorePower Yoga1559 Pacific Coast Highway Suite #103Hermosa Beach, CA 90254D r a w i n g s a n d w r i t t e n m a t e r i a l a p p e a r i n g h e r e i n c o n s t i t u t e o r i g i n a la n d u n p u b l i s h e d w o r k o f t h e A r c h i t e c t a n d m a y n o t b e d u p l i c a t e d ,u s e d o r d i s c l o s e d w i t h o u t w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f t h e A r c h i t e c t c M B H A R C H I T E C T S - 2 0 1 8 R:\CorePower Yoga\53415_Hermosa Beach_LA\02_Drawings\_Sheets\_CUP\A001_General-Information.dwgPlotted Friday August 23, 2019 9:33am by erick Project53415DMIssued/RevisedCUP PERMIT12/05/18DatePLAN CHECK RESPONSES03/27/19PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 207/16/1911X17 SETNOT TO SCALECLIENT:COREPOWER YOGA3001 BRIGHTON BLVD., SUITE #269DENVER, CO 80216PHONE: 303.501.6886CONTACT: JUSTIN RETZLAFFEMAIL: JUSTIN.RETZLAFF@COREPOWERYOGA.COMARCHITECT:MBH ARCHITECTS960 ATLANTIC AVENUEALAMEDA, CA 94501PHONE: 510.814.3584FAX: 510.865.1611CONTACT: DRAGANA MICOVICEMAIL: DRAGANAM@MBHARCH.COMHERMOSA BEACH1559 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY SUITE #103HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254GENERAL INFORMATIONA001ACTACOUSTICAL CEILING TILEA.D.AAMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACTADJADJUSTABLEAFFABOVE FINISHED FLOORAFGABOVE FINISHED GRADEALTALTERNATEALUMALUMINUMAPPROXAPPROXIMATEARCHARCHITECT, ARCHITECTURALBDBOARDBLDGBUILDINGBLKGBLOCKINGBOBOTTOM OFBOTBOTTOMCABCABINETCGCORNER GUARDCLCENTERLINECLGCEILINGCLRCLEARCOCASED OPENINGCOLCOLUMNCOMMCOMMUNICATIONCONCCONCRETECONNCONNECTION, CONNECTCONSTRCONSTRUCTIONCONTCONTINUOUS, CONTINUECPTCARPETCTRCENTERDBLDOUBLEDEMODEMOLISH, DEMOLITIONDETDETAILDIADIAMETERDIAGDIAGONAL, DIAGRAMDIMDIMENSIONDNDOWNDRDOORDWGDRAWINGDWRDRAWER(E)EXISTINGEAEACHELELEVATIONELECELECTRIC, ELECTRICALELEVELEVATOREMEREMERGENCYEQEQUALEQUIPEQUIPMENTEXTEXTERIORFAFIRE ALARMFDFLOOR DRAINFDTNFOUNDATIONFEFIRE EXTINGUISHERFECFIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETFFFINISH FLOORFINFINISH, FINISHEDFLRFLOOR, FLOORINGFLUORFLUORESCENTFOFFACE OF FINISHFOSFACE OF STUDSFRTFIRE RETARDANT TREATEDFTFOOT, FEETFTGFOOTINGGAGAGEGALVGALVANIZEDGCGENERAL CONTRACTORGLGLASSGYPGYPSUMHCHOLLOW COREHDCPHANDICAPHDBDHARDBOARDHDWHARDWAREHDWDHARDWOODHMHOLLOW METALHOHOLD OPENHORIZHORIZONTALHRHOURHTHEIGHTININCHINFOINFORMATIONINSULINSULATE, INSULATIONINTINTERIORJTJOINTLAMLAMINATE, LAMINATEDLLLANDLORDLAVLAVATORYLPLOW POINTLTLIGHTLTGLIGHTINGMAXMAXIMUMMECHMECHANICALMEDMEDIUMMEZZMEZZANINEMFRMANUFACTUREMINMINIMUM, MINUTEMISCMISCELLANEOUSMTMOUNT/MOUNTINGMTDMOUNTEDMTLMETALMVBLMOVABLE(N)NEWN/ANOT APPLICABLENICNOT IN CONTRACTNONUMBERNOMNOMINALNTSNOT TO SCALEOCON CENTEROHOVERHEADODOUTSIDE DIAMETEROPNGOPENINGOPPOPPOSITEOSCOWNER SPECIAL CONTRACTOROTSOPEN TO STRUCTUREPERPPERPENDICULARPLAMPLASTIC LAMINATEPLASPLASTERPLYWDPLYWOODPLPROPERTY LINEPTPAINT, POINT, PRESSURE TREATEDPTNPARTITIONRCPREFLECTED CEILING PLANREFREFER TO, REFERENCE, REFRIGERATORREQDREQUIREDREVREVISED, REVISIONRMROOMROROUGH OPENINGSCSOLID CORESCHEDSCHEDULESECTSECTIONSHTSHEETSIMSIMILARSPECSPECIFICATIONSQSQUARESQFTSQUARE FEETSSSTAINLESS STEELSTCSOUND TRANSMISSIONCOEFFICIENTSTDSTANDARDSTLSTEELSTORSTORAGESTRUCSTRUCTURALSUSPSUSPENDEDSYMSYMMETRICALTELTELEPHONETEMPTEMPERATURE, TEMPORARYTHKTHICK, THICKNESSTOTOP OFTVTELEVISIONTYPTYPICALUONUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDU.S.UNDERSIDEVERTVERTICALV.I.F.VERIFY IN FIELDVNRVENEERW/WITHW/OWITHOUTWCWATER CLOSET,WALLCOVERINGWDWOODWRWATER RESISTANTNCODE INFORMATIONPROJECT DIRECTORYABBREVIATIONSSHEET INDEXVICINITY PLANKEY PLANNEW CONSTRUCTIONEXISTING TO REMAINPLAN DETAILREVISIONSECTION DETAILSECTIONALIGNPROPERTY LINETO BE DEMOLISHEDAREA NOT INCONTRACTCENTER LINELEASELINE1KEYNOTECOLUMN BUBBLE ANDGRIDDATUM POINTBREAK LINEPARTITION TAGDOOR TAGFIXTURE / EQUIPMENTTAGFINISH TAGROOM NAME /NUMBERELEVATIONSELEVATIONELEVATION/CEILINGHEIGHTA-XXXXXXXA-XXXXXXXXXXXXXWINDOW TAGMIRROR TAGCEILING HEIGHTSYMBOLSALIGNXXA-XXXXA-XXXXA-XXXX.X4EXXXX-XX-XM0'-0" [0]TO FINISH FLOORX-XPROJECT INFORMATIONPROJECT AREA:2,300 SFOCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION:A-3ZONE:SPA-8EXISTING USE:GENERAL RETAILPROPOSED USE:HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTERLANDLORD (TENANT COORDINATOR):REGENCY CENTERS915 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD SUITE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90017CONTACT: ERIN SALTZMANEMAIL: ERINSALTZMAN@REGENCYCENTERS.COMAREA OF WORK:GROUND LEVEL1559 PCH #103SITE LOCATION1559 PCHHERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254APPLICABLE CODES:BUILDING CODE:2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE / 2017 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CHANGESENERGY CODE:2016 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODEGREEN BUILDING:2016 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODEMECHANICAL CODE:2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODEPLUMBING CODE:2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODEELECTRICAL CODE:2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODEFIRE CODE:2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODEADA STANDARDS:2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 11BTRUENTRUENPROJECTPACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 16TH STREETISSUED CUP SUBMITTAL 12/05/2018 PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 03/27/2019 PLAN CHECKRESPONSE 05//2019ARCHITECTURALA001GENERAL INFORMATIONA031SITE PLANA032SITE PHOTOSA033SITE PHOTOSA034SITE PHOTOSA035SITE PHOTOSA001GENERAL INFORMATIONA101DEMOLITION PLANA110CONSTRUCTION PLANA201PROPOSED ELEVATION1122PARKING SUMMARYEXISTING SPACES:423PARKING SPACES REQUIRED PER CODE:EXISTING TENANT ROSTER:427PROPOSED TENANT ROSTER:467*TOTAL REQUIRED PER CONSOLIDATED:379*PARKING PLAN AMENDMENT TO MODIFY SUITE C5 (CORE POWER YOGA)AND SUITE CF (FUTURE UNKNOWN TENANT) FROM GENERAL RETAIL TOFITNESS/ASSEMBLY.2266 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 Zoning Map and Aerial Photo Zoning Map Aerial Photo Plaza Hermosa Center SPA-8 SITE 75 LEGAL POSTERS AND RADIUS MAP 16th Street 76 Pacific Coast Highway 77 Pier Avenue 78 79 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 19-0652 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Regular Meeting of October 15, 2019 CON 19-5, PDP 19-8, VTPM #82639 - Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82639 for a two-unit detached condominium project at 626 Longfellow Avenue, and determine the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Applicant/Owner:Milton Street Residential Acquisitions C/O Berto Gonzales 6728 S. Bright Avenue, Suite C Whittier, CA 90601 Recommended Action: Adopt the attached resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82639 for a two-unit detached condominium project at 626 Longfellow Avenue, subject to conditions, and determining the project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Background: GENERAL PLAN:Medium Density Residential ZONING:Limited Multiple Family Residential (R-2B) LOT SIZE:5,287.8 square feet PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE:Unit A: 2,914.2 square feet Unit B: 3,025.3 square feet PARKING REQUIRED:4 Standard spaces/1 Guest space PARKING PROVIDED: 4 Standard spaces/2 Guest spaces ON STREET PARKING LOST/GAINED: 0 Lost/0 Gained on-street parking spaces ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Categorically Exempt, CEQA Section 15303(b) (Class 3 Exemption, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) The subject site is located at the northern portion of the City on the south side of Longfellow Avenue, between Ardmore Avenue to the west and Tennyson Place to the east. The 5,287.8 square foot lot contains a duplex with an existing curb cut providing parking access from Longfellow Avenue. There is an existing established 3.79 foot wide sidewalk on Monterey Boulevard. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 1 of 7 powered by Legistar™80 Staff Report REPORT 19-0652 Parking for the existing two-story duplex is accessed from Longfellow Avenue leading to a two-car garage and concrete driveway that can accommodate two off-street parking spaces. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing duplex and construct two detached residential condominium units on the subject site. The proposal is to provide parking access from Longfellow Avenue through a shared driveway for the two units; as a result, there is no loss or gain of on-street parking spaces on Longfellow Avenue. Unit A is a three level structure that will contain a two-car garage and entry hall on the first floor; three bedrooms, three bathrooms and laundry room on the second floor; dining room, kitchen, living room, powder room, bedroom, bathroom and deck on the third floor; and roof deck above the third floor level. Unit B is a three level structure that will contain a two-car garage recreation room, bedroom and bathroom on the first floor; three bedrooms, three bathrooms and laundry room on the second floor; dining room, kitchen, living room, bathroom and deck on the third floor; and roof deck above the third floor level. The architectural styles of both units are contemporary with exterior treatments of concrete horizontal siding; bone white colored smooth stucco, stone and bronze/wood composite window frames. Analysis: A proposal to construct a condominium project requires findings for consideration of a Precise Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map pursuant to Government Code Section 66474 and as set forth in Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) Sections 16.08.060, 17.40.020, and 17.58.030. CEQA Compliance: The proposed project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act as defined in Section 15303(b), Class 3 Exemption, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, because the proposal pertains to construction of limited numbers (two) of new, small structures. More specifically, the project is comprised of multi-family residential structures in an urbanized area, totaling no more than six dwelling units. Moreover, none of the exceptions to the Categorical Exemption apply, nor will the project result in a significant cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place over time, or have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances, or damage a scenic highway or scenic resources within a state scenic highway. The site is not located on a hazardous waste site and will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Basic Zoning Standards: The project complies with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, including the R-2B zone and design standards for condominiums in HBMC Section 17.22. CRITERIA REQUIRED PROPOSED Minimum Lot Area for 2 Units 3,500 Sq. Ft.5,287.8 Sq. Ft. Lot Coverage Maximum 65%57% Height Maximum 30’30’ Front Yard Setback Minimum 5’ Minimum with existing front yard setbacks ranging from 8’6” and 9’3” 9’ 1 3/16” All Floors Side Yard Setback Minimum East Side Yard: West Side Yard: 5’ 5’ 5’ 5’ Minimum Distance Between Buildings Used for Human Habitation 6’6’4” Rear Yard Setback (1st/2nd and 3rd floors) 5’ 1st Floor 3’ 2nd and 3rd Floors 5’ 1st Floor 5’ 2nd Floor 3’ 3rd Floor Total Parking Spaces 5 spaces total 6 spaces total Garage Parking Spaces 4 (2 per unit)4 (2 per unit) Guest Parking Space 1 2 Driveway Maximum Slope 20%15.4% Turning Radius Unit A: 24’ Unit B: 27’ Unit A: 24’ Unit B: 27’ Open Space Per Unit 300 Sq. Ft.Unit A: 552 Sq. Ft. Unit B: 400 Sq. Ft. Minimum Unit Size (4 bedroom condominium) Units A&B: 1,600 Sq. Ft. each Unit A: 2,914.2 Sq. Ft. Unit B: 3,025.3 Sq. Ft. Storage Area Per Unit 200 Cu. Ft.Unit A: 1,080 Cu. Ft. Unit B: 201.63 Cu. Ft. Solid Waste Area Per Unit Screened area for 3 bins at 2.5’ by 2.5’ each Located behind screening walls for each unit. (Bins will not obstruct required parking stall dimensions or back-up space.) City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 2 of 7 powered by Legistar™81 Staff Report REPORT 19-0652 CRITERIA REQUIRED PROPOSED Minimum Lot Area for 2 Units 3,500 Sq. Ft.5,287.8 Sq. Ft. Lot Coverage Maximum 65%57% Height Maximum 30’30’ Front Yard Setback Minimum 5’ Minimum with existing front yard setbacks ranging from 8’6” and 9’3” 9’ 1 3/16” All Floors Side Yard Setback Minimum East Side Yard: West Side Yard: 5’ 5’ 5’ 5’ Minimum Distance Between Buildings Used for Human Habitation 6’6’4” Rear Yard Setback (1st/2nd and 3rd floors) 5’ 1st Floor 3’ 2nd and 3rd Floors 5’ 1st Floor 5’ 2nd Floor 3’ 3rd Floor Total Parking Spaces 5 spaces total 6 spaces total Garage Parking Spaces 4 (2 per unit)4 (2 per unit) Guest Parking Space 1 2 Driveway Maximum Slope 20%15.4% Turning Radius Unit A: 24’ Unit B: 27’ Unit A: 24’ Unit B: 27’ Open Space Per Unit 300 Sq. Ft.Unit A: 552 Sq. Ft. Unit B: 400 Sq. Ft. Minimum Unit Size (4 bedroom condominium) Units A&B: 1,600 Sq. Ft. each Unit A: 2,914.2 Sq. Ft. Unit B: 3,025.3 Sq. Ft. Storage Area Per Unit 200 Cu. Ft.Unit A: 1,080 Cu. Ft. Unit B: 201.63 Cu. Ft. Solid Waste Area Per Unit Screened area for 3 bins at 2.5’ by 2.5’ each Located behind screening walls for each unit. (Bins will not obstruct required parking stall dimensions or back-up space.) Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) have been submitted and will be reviewed by Planning Division for compliance with applicable sections of the zoning ordinance and this entitlement, should the Planning Commission approve. Access and Parking: Access to the on-site parking is provided through a shared 16-foot wide driveway approach that is located on the west side of the lot. The driveway extends to the rear Unit B garage via an 11-foot wide driveway. The driveway slope profiles indicate the driveway slope will be 15.4% at the steepest City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 3 of 7 powered by Legistar™82 Staff Report REPORT 19-0652 point, well within the maximum allowed slope of 20% pursuant to HBMC Section 17.44.120.D. The project has been designed to preserve existing on-street parking spaces by locating the driveway at the furthest west point of the lot and providing a driveway which curves to the east providing access to the Unit A garage. There are currently two 20-foot long street parking spaces between the subject site and the property to the west (624 Longfellow Avenue) and one 17-foot long street parking space between the subject site and the property to the east (632 Longfellow Avenue). The proposed design will provide one 20-foot long street parking space between the subject site and the property to the west (624 Longfellow Avenue) and two 19-foot long street parking spaces between the subject site and the property to the east (632 Longfellow Avenue). Landscape and Green Measures: All plants must be water conserving as required by the Hermosa Beach Water Conservation and Drought Management Plan (HBMC Section 8.56) and Water Efficient Landscaping (HBMC Section 8.60). The landscape plan includes a mixture of drought tolerant plants including Mexican Feather Grass, Narrow Leaf Chalksticks, and Dwarf Blue Sticks. In addition, the landscape plan will include one 36-inch box Queen Palm tree to be located with the front yard area on the subject site fronting Longfellow Avenue. In addition, the applicant will provide a minimum of one 24-inch box size tree (palm variety) within the City’s public right-of-way fronting Longfellow Avenue and the tree species must be listed on the Public Works Department’s Approved Tree List. The project is conditioned to ensure that all planting materials and trees comply with HBMC Section 8.60, Water Efficient Landscaping. The landscape plan shows that catch basins with sump pumps will be provided on-site and an automatic irrigation system with a moisture sensor is proposed for the landscaped areas. The project must comply with Section 8.44 Hermosa Beach Stormwater and Urban Runoff Pollution Control Regulations. Additionally, 65% of demolition debris must be recycled, and cement used in foundation mix design must be reduced by not less than 20%, among other requirements. Hermosa Beach’s Electrical Code (Section 15.32) requires installation of conduit sized to accommodate solar energy and solar thermal systems. Compatibility with surrounding area: The subject site is zoned R-2B Limited Multiple Family Residential with similar residentially zoned properties to the north, east, south and west. Similar residential development is found in the surrounding area comprised primarily of multi-story, multi-family residences. The proposed layout of the building is consistent with multiple-family residential buildings in the immediate neighborhood because the multiple-family residential buildings have entryways fronting Longfellow Avenue. Unit A will have a main entryway to the building oriented towards Longfellow Avenue. Unit B will have a main entryway accessed from the east side yard. The two-unit condominium is detached to avoid the long-row appearance and provides third level decks oriented towards the northwest. There is a prevailing front yard setback on the south side of Longfellow Avenue between Ardmore Avenue and Tennyson Place. A survey of front yard setbacks shows existing front yard setbacks ranging from 8’6” and 9’3” measured from the front property line. There is an additional 2’6” public right-of-way area located between the front property lines and sidewalk giving the appearance of an even greater front yard setback. Therefore, the proposed 9’ 1 3/16” front yard setback is appropriate City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 4 of 7 powered by Legistar™83 Staff Report REPORT 19-0652 and consistent with surrounding development. Subdivision Map: The applicant has applied for a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82639.A vesting tentative parcel map grants vested rights to proceed with a project in accordance with the ordinances, polices and standards in effect at the time the application for approval of the vesting tentative map is completed. The proposed two-unit condominium is on an existing standard lot, meeting the minimum 4,000 square foot lot size minimum with a 50-foot lot width. The R-2B zone requires a minimum lot size of 1,750 square feet per unit (with no more than two dwelling units per lot); thus allowing a maximum of two dwelling units on the 5,287.8 square foot lot. The lot is similar to surrounding lot sizes and lot widths within the same zone, and the General Plan Land Use designation for lots in the vicinity, and thus complies with Hermosa Beach ordinances regarding subdivision of lots. The project is conditioned upon payment of Park and Recreation Area Dedication fees for each unit as there is inadequate area on-site for land dedication per City required Parks and Recreation Area fees. The proposed two-unit condominium can connect to the existing utilities that service the residential uses in the immediate neighborhood. In addition, the existing utilities have the capacity to serve the proposed development. The submitted plans were preliminarily reviewed by the Fire Department, Public Works Department, and Building & Safety Division, and no major concerns were identified. The proposed subdivision and improvements are compliant with criteria for approval of a subdivision map and are not likely to cause serious public health problems within the proposed subdivision. The design of the proposed subdivision is compatible with the immediate residential environment. General Plan Consistency: The proposed two-unit condominium is located within the Medium Density Residential (MD) General Plan Land Use designation area, the purpose of which is to provide for the enhancement and reinvestment in mixed scale residential neighborhoods in Hermosa Beach. This medium density residential designation permits property owners to construct two residential units on a single lot. It is located throughout the city to provide a transition between higher density residential or commercial uses and single-family neighborhoods. Appropriate land uses include small-scale residential uses, including single family, duplex, condominiums, and townhouses in a two unit per lot format. The appropriate density range is between 13.1 to 25 dwelling units per acre. The subject site is also located within the Hermosa View Neighborhood character area as indicated in the City’s General Plan, which is exclusively residential with a predominance of single-family homes, and a few properties with two units per lot. The future vision of this neighborhood includes preserving building form, orientation and/or scale, and retaining the unique streetscape with wide parkways and uninterrupted sidewalks. The low-density residential development pattern of this neighborhood should be maintained through the retention of larger lot sizes, building orientation toward the street, and wider setbacks that provide room for parkways and sidewalks. The desired building design and orientation within this neighborhood area includes residences which City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 5 of 7 powered by Legistar™84 Staff Report REPORT 19-0652 address the street with their primary facades, a variety or architectural styles and houses on lots larger than 5,000 square feet providing setbacks at a considerable distance from the street in a more typical “suburban” pattern. Longfellow Avenue has a unique streetscape quality within this neighborhood, with wider well-kept planter strips and tall palm trees. The proposed project is consistent with the MD Land Use designation in that it will contribute to the residential neighborhood as a multi-family (two-unit on a single lot) development and meets the intention of the Hermosa View Neighborhood character area with a density of 16.48 dwelling units per acre. The design of the detached two-unit development is consistent with the Hermosa View character area in that the front building provides a 9’ 1 3/16” front yard setback, which is consistent with the surrounding existing residential buildings on the south side of the block. Another building design element that is consistent with the character area is orientation of the front unit entry towards the street and designing a façade which incorporates a large northwest facing balcony to eliminate the appearance of a flat and box-like building. The proposed parking access for both units will be accessed from a shared driveway from Longfellow Avenue, which preserves on-street parking and will continue the unique streetscape with wide well-kept planter strips and tall palm trees on Longfellow Avenue. The proposed design features implement the following PLAN Hermosa goals and policies in the Land Use policies 1.6 Scale and Context., 2.1 Complete Neighborhoods, 2.3 Balanced Neighborhoods, 2.6 Diversity of building types and styles, 2.7 Context sensitive design, 5.1 Scale and Massing, 5.6 Eclectic and diverse architecture, 6.7 Pedestrian Orientated Design, and 6.9 Shared driveways. Perfect consistency is not required with all General Plan policies. Consistency means that the project does not impede the City’s ability to meet its General Plan goals. The proposed uses are in line with the City’s long-term vision set out in the General Plan and the overall project does not impede the City’s ability to meet its goals Summary: The project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map as conditioned are consistent with the zoning code, subdivision laws and other relevant provisions of the Municipal Code, and the site is physically suitable for the type and density of proposed development. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #82639 for a two-unit detached condominium project at 626 Longfellow Avenue, and determining the project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Attachments: 1.Proposed Resolution 2.Site Photographs 3.Applicant Submittal 4.Survey of Front Yard Setbacks 5.Radius Map City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 6 of 7 powered by Legistar™85 Staff Report REPORT 19-0652 6.Poster Verification Respectfully Submitted by: Nicole Ellis, Associate Planner Legal Review: Lauren Langer, City Attorney Approved: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 7 of 7 powered by Legistar™86 1 P.C. Resolution 19-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND VESTING TENATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 82639 FOR A TWO-UNIT DETACHED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 626 LONGFELLOW AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 75 AND 76 OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CONVENTION HALL AND MARINA VIEW PARK TRACT, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND DETERMINING THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed on July 15, 2019 by the property owner/applicant Milton Street Residential Acquisitions, for development of property located at 626 Longfellow Avenue, seeking approval of Conditional Use Permit 19-5, Precise Development Plan 19-8, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82639 for a proposed two-unit detached residential condominium. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the subject application on October 15, 2019, at which time testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby finds, determines, and declares the project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(b), Class 3 Exemption, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures because the proposal pertains to construction of limited numbers (two) of new, small structures. More specifically, the project is comprised of multi-family residential structures in an urbanized area, totaling no more than six dwelling units. Moreover, none of the exceptions to the Categorical Exemption apply, nor will the project result in a significant cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place over time, or have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances, or damage a scenic highway or scenic resources within a state scenic highway. The site is not located on a hazardous waste site and will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Section 4. Based on the testimony and evidence received, the Planning Commission hereby further finds, determines and declares pertaining to the application for a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map pursuant to the California Government Code Section 66474 and Section 16.08.060 of the Municipal Code. 1. The proposal is generally consistent with the General Plan in that it does not impede the City’s ability to meet its General Plan goals with regard to the Medium Density (MD) Residential designation that allows for multiple dwellings. The proposal meets the Medium Density designation because it will provide two-units on a 5,287.8 square foot lot. As 87 2 conditioned, the proposal is consistent with applicable development standards set forth in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) for the R-2B zone. 2. The site is physically suitable for a two-unit detached residential condominium project. The two-unit detached residential condominium project contains a total of five on-site parking spaces with four spaces located within garages and two guest parking spaces. This development complies with all development standards and does not require approval of a deviation. 3. The subdivision and improvements provide for adequate drainage, sanitation and potable water, underground utilities, parking and construction requirements, and therefore are not likely to cause public health problems. The project as conditioned will provide permeable surfacing and storm water retention facilities to the maximum extent feasible per HBMC Section 8.44.095 and any additional non-percolated or retained storm water will be conveyed to an onsite subsurface infiltration system as required by HBMC Section 8.44.095 subject to maintenance agreements. 4. The proposed subdivision will front on a public street, will provide vehicular access from Longfellow Avenue and does not exhibit dedicated public easements. Therefore, the subdivision and improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 5. Design of the proposed subdivision as conditioned is generally compatible and consistent with applicable elements of the City’s General Plan, and with the prevailing approximately 5,280 square foot lot sizes, and prevailing approximately 50-foot lot frontages in the immediate environment. In addition, design of the proposed subdivision is consistent with purposes of the General Plan land use designation, density, applicable HBMC development standards, parking, access, and services are provided. 6. The project, as conditioned, will conform to all zoning requirements including, but not limited to setbacks, lot coverage, open space, building height, and parking. The project also conforms to all condominium standards including, but not limited to private storage space, minimum unit sizes, architecture and building layout, landscaping, and will be compatible with neighboring properties that are developed with similar multi-story multi-family residences. 7. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303(b) since the project is construction of a limited numbers (two) of new, small structures. 8. The proposed subdivision will be consistent with the prevailing lot patterns and is not likely to reduce property values in the surrounding neighborhood area because the project is similar to surrounding development, consists only of the division of airspace at less than the maximum density allowed, and conditions have been placed on the project to ensure compatibility. 88 3 Section 5. Based on the testimony and evidence received, the Planning Commission hereby further finds, determines and declares pertaining to the application for Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan pursuant to Sections 17.40.020 and 17.58.030 of the Municipal Code. 1. Distance from existing residential uses in relation to negative effects; The subject site is zoned R-2B Limited Multiple Family Residential with similar residentially zoned properties to the north, east, south and west of the subject site. The subject site is large enough to accommodate two units. Similar residential development is found in the surrounding area comprised primarily of multi-story multi-family residences. 2. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking in relation to actual need; The proposed two-unit condominium will provide vehicular access through a shared driveway located on the west side of the subject site from Longfellow Avenue leading to two two-car garages, which provides a total of four off-street enclosed parking spaces on-site. In addition, two on-site guest parking spaces will be provided. One guest space will be designated for Unit A and will be located in tandem with the garage and the other guest space will be designated for Unit B and located at the southwest corner of the lot and adjacent to the Unit B garage. 3. The combination of uses proposed, as they relate to compatibility; The proposed two-unit detached residential use is consistent and compatible because the immediate neighborhood includes multi-family residences. 4. The relationship of the estimated generated traffic volume and the capacity and safety of streets serving the area; The proposed two-unit condominium will retain similar traffic volume generated from the project site because the proposal will maintain the same number of units. Longfellow Avenue is designated in the General Plan as a local street, and has sufficient capacity to serve the proposed development and surrounding neighborhood. 5. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area; The proposed two-unit condominium will not have signs, thus will not be incompatible with the area. Nevertheless, it is important to consider the architectural style (décor) as part of this approval. The applicant is proposing a contemporary style, which can be found on other properties in the neighborhood. Accordingly, the décor of the building will be compatible with the existing residences in the area. 6. Building and driveway orientation in relation to sensitive uses, e.g., residences, schools, churches, hospitals and playgrounds; The proposed design of the two-unit condominium is consistent with same aspects of the desired building form and character of the Hermosa View character area with articulation of the front building façade (front elevation from Longfellow Avenue). Unit A will have a main entryway to the building oriented towards Longfellow Avenue. Unit B will have a main entryway accessed from the east side yard. The two-unit condominium is detached to avoid the long-row appearance and provides third level decks oriented towards the northwest. 89 4 There is a prevailing front yard setback on the south side of Longfellow Avenue between Ardmore Avenue and Tennyson Place. A survey of front yard setbacks shows existing front yard setbacks ranging from 8’6” and 9’3” measured from the front property line. There is an additional 2’6” public right-of-way area located between the front property lines and sidewalk giving the appearance of an even greater front yard setback. Therefore, the proposed 9’ 1 3/16” front yard setback is appropriate and consistent with surrounding development. Vehicular access is provided from a shared driveway located on the west side of the subject site from Longfellow Avenue leading to two two-car garages and two guest parking spaces, with a total of six off-street parking spaces on the subject site. The 3.79 foot wide sidewalk on Monterey Boulevard will be maintained for pedestrian access. There are no other nearby sensitive uses such as schools, churches, hospitals or playgrounds. 7. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use; The proposed two-unit detached condominium is not anticipated to create adverse impacts because the proposed use of the property is residential, which is consistent with the use of the surrounding residential neighborhood. Construction of the two-unit condominium will cause temporary noise, odor, dust, and vibration, but they will be ceased when the construction has been completed. 8. Impact of the proposed use to the city’s infrastructure, and/or services; There is sufficient capacity to serve the proposed two-unit condominium. The proposed residential use will have similar demand on the current infrastructure and services because the proposal will maintain the same number of units from the existing subject site. 9. Adequacy of mitigation measures to minimize environmental impacts in quantitative terms; The proposed two-unit condominium does not create adverse environmental impacts because the proposed residential use and building design is consistent with surrounding uses and development within the neighborhood and complies with all applicable criteria set forth in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code and General Plan. Nevertheless, multiple conditions of approval have been incorporated into this action. With these conditions, any potential impact will be mitigated. 10. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the planning commission, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole. None noted. Section 6. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the subject Conditional Use Permit 19-5 Precise Development Plan 19-8, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82639 for a two-unit detached condominium subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 90 5 General: 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans received and approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting of October 15, 2019. Minor modifications that do not affect scale, type, location or intensity of uses or impacts thereof may be approved by the Community Development Director when not in conflict with the findings or conditions of this permit. 2. The project shall fully comply with all requirements of the R-2B zone as applicable and the Condominium Ordinance in Chapter 17.22 of the Municipal Code, including but not limited to: a) Height, including required roof deck railings, shall fully comply with the 30-foot height limit. Precise building height compliance shall be reviewed at the time of Plan Check, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. b) Design and construction shall comply with HBMC Section 17.22.060 except as specifically stated in this Resolution. c) Conduit to accommodate roof mounted alternative energy equipment for solar energy and solar thermal shall also be supplied per HBMC Section 15.32.140. d) The requirements of HBMC Section 17.22.060(F) and (G) shall be shown on structural plans and reviewed at the time of Building Division Plan Check. e) A minimum of 200 cubic feet of storage area shall be provided for each unit in accordance with HBMC Section 17.22.060(E). f) Designated, screened solid waste storage areas, a minimum of 2.5’ x 2.5’ (length times width) each, for three solid waste storage bins shall be shown on the site plan compliance with HBMC Chapter 8.12. 3. The submitted Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director in conformance with HBMC Section 17.22.050 and conditions of this approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. a) Proof of recordation of approved CC&Rs shall be submitted to the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. b) Six parking spaces (four garage spaces and two guest parking spaces) shall be maintained on-site. All parking spaces shall remain available for parking and shall not be used for storage or other purposes. Storage of boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles shall not be allowed and the CC&Rs shall reflect this condition. 91 6 4. The project shall comply with all requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach Building Division, Public Works Department, Los Angeles County Fire Department, and the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Building Plans: 5. Two copies of a Final Landscape Plan, consistent with landscape plans approved by the Planning Commission, indicating size, type, quantity and characteristics of landscape materials shall be submitted to the Community Development Department and Planning Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The Final Landscape Plan shall also include the following: a) The applicant shall provide a landscape plan to comply with HBMC Sections 17.22.060(H), 8.60.060, and 8.60.070 to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Public Works Director. b) An automatic landscape sprinkler system consistent with HBMC Section 17.22.060(H) shall be provided, and shall be shown on plans (Building Permits are required). 6. Architectural treatments and accessory facilities shall be as shown on building elevations, site and floor plans. Precise building height compliance shall be reviewed at the time of Plan Check, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. In addition: a) All parking dimensions shall comply with HBMC Chapter 17.44. Roll-up automatic garage doors shall be installed on all garage door openings and clearly indicated on floor plans. b) Driveway transitions shall comply with HBMC Section 17.44.120(D). c) All exterior lighting shall be downcast, fully shielded and illumination shall be contained within the property boundaries. Lighting shall be energy conserving and motion detector lighting shall be used for all lighting except low-level (3 feet or less in height) security lighting and porch lights. Lamp bulbs and images shall not be visible from within any onsite or offsite residential unit. Exterior lighting shall not be deemed finally approved until 30 days after installation, during which period the building official may order the dimming or modification of any illumination found to be excessively brilliant or impacting to nearby properties. d) Any satellite dish antennas and/or similar equipment shall comply with HBMC Section 17.46.240. 7. The plans shall comply with HBMC Section 8.44.095 and install permeable surfaces in the driveway, guest parking space and other non-landscaped areas to the maximum extent feasible. If providing water-permeable surfaces on at least 50% of exterior surface area is not feasible and incorporating measures in 8.44.095 to the extent practicable to infiltrate the volume of runoff produced by a 0.80 inch twenty four (24) hour rain event, 92 7 then the applicant shall infiltrate runoff on-site. In the event that subsurface infiltration is required, plans shall designate the exact location of the subsurface infiltration system, the applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City (prior to final map approval) for the ongoing infiltration, and provide a surety bond to the City to guarantee that on-site, subsurface infiltration is achieved. The amount of the bond shall be determined by the Building Division. All other drainage shall be routed to an off-site facility or on-site permeable area approved by the City. To the extent possible, a portion of roof drainage shall be routed to on-site permeable areas. No drainage shall flow over any driveway or sidewalk. If the drainage of surface waters onto the property requires a sump pump to discharge waters onto the street, the property owner(s) shall record an agreement to assume the risk associated with use and operation of said sump pump, release the City from any liability, and indemnify the City regarding receipt of surface waters from the property. The recorded agreement must be filed with the City prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 8. The plans and construction shall comply with all requirements of the Building Code in Title 15 and Green Building Standards in Chapter 15.48. Water conservation practices set forth in Section 8.56.070 shall be complied with and noted on construction plans. 9. Two copies of final construction plans, including site, elevation and floor plans, which are consistent with the conditions of approval of this conditional use permit, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division for consistency with Planning Commission approved plans and this Resolution prior to the submittal to the Building Division for Plan Check. 10. Prior to the submittal of structural plans to the Building Division for Plan Check the permittee and the owners of the property involved shall file at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department an Affidavit of Acceptance stating that they are aware of, and agree to and accept, all of the conditions of this permit. The permittee shall record with the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office the Affidavits of Acceptance and Resolution(s), and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. The applicant shall submit all required plans and reports to comply with the City’s construction debris recycling program including manifests from both the recycler and County landfill; at least 65% of demolition debris associated with demolition of the existing improvements and new construction shall be recycled. 12. The address of each condominium unit shall be conspicuously displayed on the street side of the buildings with externally or internally lit numbers and the method for illumination shall be shown on plans. Address numbering and display shall be subject to approval by the Community Development Department. Public Works 93 8 13. Civil engineering plans shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer and conceptually approved by the Hermosa Beach Public Works Department prior to submitting an application for Building Permits to the Community Development Department. Complete civil engineering plans shall address grading, undergrounding of all utilities, pavement, sidewalk, curb and gutter improvements, on-site and off-site drainage (no sheet flow permitted), installation of utility laterals, and all other improvements necessary to comply with the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code and Public Works specifications, and shall be filed with the Community Development Department. 14. Civil engineering plans shall include adjacent properties/structures, sewer laterals, and storm drain main lines on street. 15. A minimum of one 24-inch box size tree shall be provided within the City’s public right- of-way fronting Longfellow Avenue and the tree species shall be listed on the Public Works Department’s Approved Tree List. 16. Project construction shall protect private and public property in compliance with HBMC Sections 15.04.070 and 15.04.140. No work in the public right of way shall commence unless and until all necessary permits are attained from the Public Works Department including if required, an approved Residential or Commercial Encroachment Permit. 17. Sewer flow rate for upstream and downstream manhole along with manhole rim/lid elevations must be submitted prior to grading and plan check. Sewer lateral video must be submitted with plan check submittal, if the developer plans to use the existing sewer lateral. Sewer lateral work may be required after review of the sewer lateral video. 18. Sewer lateral video must be submitted with plan check submittal, if the developer plans to use the existing sewer lateral. Sewer lateral work may be required after review of the sewer lateral video. 19. Sewer main work may be required after review of sewer lateral video. 20. The project must comply with Storm Water and Urban Runoff Pollution Control Regulations (HBMC Ch. 8.44) and must implement Low Impact Development Standards, and submit at time of grading and plan check along with an erosion control plan. Final Map and Certificate of Occupancy 21. The Final Map shall comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and Chapter 16.08 of the Municipal Code. 22. Prior to filing of the Final Map, applicant shall pay to the City of Hermosa Beach Park and Recreation Area Dedication fees per unit in lieu of onsite parkland dedication pursuant to Chapter 16.12. 94 9 23. Prior to approval of the Final Map, and prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, outstanding assessments must either be paid in full or apportioned to any newly created parcels. Notice of same shall be provided to the Community Development Director. Assessment payoff amounts may be obtained by calling the City’s Assessment Administrator at (800) 755-6864. Applications for apportionment may be obtained in the Public Works Department. 24. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written approval from each utility company associated with the relocation of the existing utility pole, down guy and utility boxes must be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department and the Community Development Department. Construction 25. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, abutting property owners and residents within 100 feet of the project site shall be notified of the anticipated date for commencement of construction. a) The form of the notification shall be provided by the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. b) Building permits will not be issued until the applicant provides an affidavit certifying mailing of the notice. 26. Project construction shall conform to the Noise Control Ordinance requirements in HBMC Section 8.24.050. Allowed hours of construction shall be printed on the building plans and posted at construction site. 27. Traffic control measures, including flagmen, shall be utilized to preserve public health, safety, and welfare. Other: 28. Approval of these permits shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval by the Planning Commission, unless significant construction or improvements or the use authorized hereby has commenced. One or more extensions of time may be requested. No extension shall be considered unless requested, in writing to the Community Development Director including the reason therefore, at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. No additional notice of expiration will be provided. 29. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Map and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. 30. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this permit and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation 95 10 applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. Section 8. This permit shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department an Affidavit of Acceptance stating that they are aware of, and agree to and accept, all of the conditions of this permit. The Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Map shall be recorded with the Affidavit of Acceptance, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. To the extent permitted by law, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Hermosa Beach, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the “indemnified parties”) from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void any permit or approval for this project authorized by the City, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorney’s fees and costs in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this permit. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. Section 9. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 19-XX is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at its regular meeting of October 15, 2019. 96 11 David Pedersen, Chair Ken Robertson, Secretary October 15, 2019 Date 97 626 Longfellow Avenue- Project Site and Neighborhood Photos 98 -Scope of WorkProject Address626 Longfellow AveLegal DescriptionSouthern California Convention Hall and MarineView Park Lots 75 And Lot 76Assessors Parcel No.4169-031-012Zoning R2BScope of WorkNew 2 unit CondominiumType of Construction:V-BOccupancies:R3/USprinklers:NFPA 13DArchitect & ConsultantsApplicant:Milton Street Residential6728 S Bright Ave, Suite CWhittier, CA 90601,California 90254Architect:Buchmann Design, Architectural Corp.746 4th StreetHermosa Beach, CA 90254(310) 896-8331 OfficeSheet IndexCover Sheet + Project Information1.0Site Plan2.0Landscape Plan2.1Basement Floor Plan3.01st Floor Plan4.02nd Floor Plan5.0Roof Plan6.0Proposed Building Elevations7.0Proposed Building Elevations8.0Topographic Survey9.0BasementFirst FloorSecond FloorRoof PlanGeneral Building Information (Note: For addition and remodelprojects, Please provide information for existing area and added area)Garage (Interior Dimensions)21'-0" x 20'-0"(min 10.5' x 20' per stall)Basement Living Area317.81st Level Living Area1,4012nd Level Living Area1,195.43rd Level Living Area0Roof Deck500.5Decks/Balconies233.7Total Living Area2,914.2Total Decks/Balconies734.2No. of Bedrooms4No. of Bathrooms4.5Zoning InformationRequiredProvidedArea: Lot Area5,287.8 Lot Coverage65% MaxIWò(57%)Yards: Front5'9.1' Side5'-0"5'-0" Rear5'-0"5'-0"Parking and Driveways: Number of Spaces44 Guest Spaces22 Parking SetbackN/AN/A Parking Stall Dimension8.5' x 17'8.5' x 17' Turning Area Driveway Width17'17' Driveway Maximum Slope20%15.4%Open Space: On Grade0218.3 Decks/Balconies200734.5 Total600952.8Unit A Basement Qualification Calculation (Required for allprojects proposing two stories and basement)1st Level F.F. Elevation108.5Lineal Feet (LF) of Perimeter161.4LF of Perimeter <6' from grade to F.F. above91.4% of Perimeter <6' to F.F. above56.6%General Building Information (Note: For addition and remodelprojects, Please provide information for existing area and added area)Garage (Interior Dimensions)18'-0" x 20'-0"(min 8.5' x 20' per stall)Basement Living Area01st Level Living Area579.92nd Level Living Area1,350.93rd Level Living Area1,094.5Roof Deck475.6Decks/Balconies300Total Living Area3,025.3Total Decks/Balconies775.6No. of Bedrooms4No. of Bathrooms4.5Unit B Basement Qualification Calculation (Required for allprojects proposing two stories and basement)1st Level F.F. Elevation109.87Lineal Feet (LF) of Perimeter123.8LF of Perimeter <6' from grade to F.F. above63.9% of Perimeter <6' to F.F. above51.6%Surveyor:Sam A. Soliven, P.L.S.The Land Surveyor2230 W. Chapman Ave #156Orange, CA 92868(714) 376-7123 Officesam@thelandsurveyor.comCivil Engineer:Christian J. PerezPeru Consultants, LLP(310) 270-0811 Officeperuconsultants@live.com99 New 2 unitCondominiumUnit AFFE - 100.41 BaseFFE - 109.41 1stFFE - 119.66 2ndB DrivewayprofileC DrivewayprofileA DrivewayprofileD DrivewayprofileE DrivewayprofileNew 2 unitCondominiumUnit BFFE - 109.87 1stFFE - 119.87 2ndFFE - 130.37 3rdDn1 0 7 . 2 ' F S DrivewayprofileDrivewayprofile9 8 . 0 6 ' F L 98 . 6 9 ' FS 9 8 . 8 4 ' F S 9 8 . 8 4 ' F S 9 8 .9 0 ' F S 9 7 .8 6 ' F S 9 7 . 86 ' F S 1 0 0 .7 5 ' F S 97 . 7 1 ' FS 9 7 . 0 8 ' F L 16' 9 8 . 3 5 ' F S 9 8 . 3 5 ' F S 98 . 2 0 ' FS 9 7 .5 7 ' F L 100.61'FSNote: Conduit shall be provided from theelectric service panel to the roof of eachunit unit to accommodate for future solar10 0 . 61 ' F S 9 9 .4 7 ' F L 10 0 . 3 ' FS 9 9 . 8 5 ' F S 9 9 . 8 5 ' F S 9 9 . 2 3 ' F L 99 . 8 5 ' FS 1 0 9 . 3 3 ' F S 1 0 7 . 0 ' F S 1 0 7 . 5 ' F S 1 1 9 . 7 8 ' F S 1 0 9 . 8 7 ' F S 9 9 . 2 4 ' F S 9.11'Proposed Setback5'Front Setback12.83'5'Required Setback3'2nd FloorSetback2% Cross Slopeat Sidewalk27'5' Side Setback 5' Side Setback 5' Side SetbackDnDn11' DrivewayDrivewayprofile GuestParkingAC Condensor1 2 0 . 2 2 ' PC 1 1 7 . 6 1 ' PC 1 0 1 .0 6 ' PC 9 7 . 5 9 'PC1 0 0 . 6 8 ' F S 1 0 1 . 8 7 ' F S 3% Slope20% Slope10% Slope21' 20' Door 18' 17' Door10% S lope DnDnDn1 0 3 . 6 5 ' F S 1 0 5 .4 2 ' F S 10 7 . 2 ' F S 10 8 . 9 8 ' F S 1 19 . 7 8 ' F S 1 15 . 3 7 ' F S 10'21'24'9.1'Existing Setback9.3'Existing Setback17.58'12.42'44.17'IWò33.58' 2.08'IWò6.08' 26.67'IWò20.92' 35'IWò19' Lot Size IWò56.7%Building coverage 3000.4IWòHardscape Area IWò9.3%Landscaped Area IWò9.3%Impervious AreaIWò4.33'IWò4.42' 2.25'IWò8.17' 2.75'IWò18.83' 4.83'IWò13' 12.42'IWò16.92' 11.64'IWò5.33' 11.65'IWò6.75' 2.74'5.44'3.79'8'45.18'8'96.71'FL97. 0 8 ' FS 97. 7 1 ' FS 97 . 8 6 ' FS 98 . 8 3 ' FS 10 5 . 7 9 ' FS 10 6 . 6 3 ' FS 10 7 . 1 4 ' Li p o f G a r a g e Property Line 17.13'15.4%6%10%Transition9%2.64'9 7 . 8 6 ' F S 10 7 . 6 ' B a c k o f G a r a g e2%97 . 8 6 ' FS Face of Garage5.48'.5'2.74'3.8'8'45.18'8'18.25'18.25'Property Line 1 0 5 . 9 4 ' F S 1 0 6 . 9 3 ' F S 1 0 7 . 6 5 ' F S 1 0 8 . 0 6 ' F S3%4%Transition15.4%9%2.6'10%Transition96.71'FL97 . 8 6 ' FS 98 . 8 3 ' FS 97. 0 8 ' FS 97. 7 1 ' FS 9 7 . 8 6 ' F S 97 . 8 6 ' FS GuestParking5.51'2.67'3.78'98.08'FL9 8 . 1 1 ' F S 98.7 3 ' FS 98 . 8 7 ' FS 98.8 8 ' FS 2%Face of Garage 21.25'Property Line 5.4%2.6'23.67'9 8 . 8 8 ' FS 1 0 0 . 1 6 ' Lip o f G a rag e 1 0 0 . 5 8 ' B a c k o f G a r a g e3.79'2.69'5.5'97.64'FL9 7 . 7 3 ' F S 98.36' FS 98.46' FS 98.55' FS 1 0 0 . 1 6 ' Li p o f G a r a g e 2%Face of Garage 21.25'Property Line 6.1%2.6'23.25'98.7 3 ' FS 1 0 0 . 5 8 ' Ba c k o f G a r a g e 3.79'2.7'5.5'97.28'FL9 7 . 3 6 ' F S 97.99' FS 98.08' FS 98.14' FS 1 0 0 . 1 6 ' Li p o f Ga r a g e 2%Face of Garage 21.25'Property Line 3%2.6'23.51'98.4 6 ' FS 1 0 0 . 5 8 ' B a c k o f G a r a g e -18" = 1'-0"0 2 4 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 5856 60 140 142 144 146 148 158156154152150 160 162 164 166 168 178176174172170 180662646866707274787680828488869092949896100102104108106110112114118116120122124128126130132134138136 100 New 2 unitCondominiumUnit AFFE - 100.41 BaseFFE - 109.41 1stFFE - 119.66 2ndNew 2 unitCondominiumUnit BFFE - 109.87 1stFFE - 119.87 2ndFFE - 130.37 3rd16'9.11'Proposed Setback5'Front Setback12.83'3'2nd FloorSetback27'5' Side Setback 5' Side Setback 5' Side Setback 11' Driveway CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCBBB21' 20' Door 18' 17' Door BBBA10'21'24'9.1'Existing Setback9.3'20'20'17'19'20'19'14'-18" = 1'-0"0 2 4 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 5856 60 140 142 144 146 148 158156154152150 160 162 164 166 168 178176174172170 180662646866707274787680828488869092949896100102104108106110112114118116120122124128126130132134138136 BMexican FeatherGrass3' WLow5g16AQueen Palm15' WMed36" Box1TreeShrubSymbolQtySizeBotanical NameCommon NameMature HeightWucolsTypePlanting LegendPictureDiameter2' H30' HCNarrow LeafChalksticks3' WLow5g46Shrub2' HDwarf Blue Sticks3' WLow4"Shrub1' HWater Permeable Surface Area(s)Impervious Surface AreaLot Square Footage: 5287.8Building Footprint: 2126.41Driveway: 1841.97Total Exterior Surface Area = Lot Sq. Ft. - Building Footprint= 5287.8 sq. ft. - 2126.41 sq. ft.Max 20% of landscaped area may be used for high water uselandscape (turf and plants) as listed in the Water Use Classificationfor Landscape Species (WUCOLS)113.19 sq. ft. (landscaped areas) x 20% (max high water use)Max high water use = 22.63 sq. ft.= 0 sq. ft. proposed < 22.63 sq. ftMinimum 50% of exterior surface area must consist of waterpermeable surfaces as required in HBMC.Permeable Areas: 1993.9 sq. ft.Nonpermeable Areas: 1240.83 sq. ft.Permeable Areas 1864.58 sq. ft./3161.39 sq. ft. = 58% permeable101 43'-9" ō*DUDJHō ō(QWU\ō ō(OHYō 43'-9"33'-7"33'-7"1'-2"20'-0"12'-5"31'-5"12'-4" 2'-6"11'-10"1'-3"1'-6"1'-11"4'-3"2'-4"2'-5"6'-212"1'-6"22'-2"15'-4"21'-8"11'-11"101. 0 6' PC 97.5 9' PC ō6WRUDJHō 1080 cubic ft ō7UDVKō 20'-0"1'-2"6'-3" 2'-3"9'-8" 28'-2"3'-3"4'-812"5'-0" Required Setback 9'-1" Poroposed Setback 21'-0"Clear35'-0" ō%DWKō ō(OHYōō5HF5RRPō ō*DUDJHō 5'-8"11'-10" 35'-0"39'-11"35'-9"17'-012"18'-1"4'-7"18'-0"4'-5"6'-4"6'-7"20'-0"2'-7"12'-5"4'-9"2'-5"612"8'-0"712"5'-11"7'-11" 120. 2 2' PC 117. 6 1' PC ō%HGURRPō ō6WRUDJHō 201.63 cubic ft 5' Required Setback 5'Required Setback5'Required Setback18'-3"8'-6"10'-11"6'-112"1112"15'-6"6'-0"6'-5" 2'-0" - 102 43'-9" ō%HGURRPōō0DVWHU%HGURRPō ō0DVWHU&ORVHWō ō0DVWHU%DWKō ō%HGURRPō ō%DWKō ō(OHYō 43'-9"33'-10"33'-7"2'-8"4'-3"4'-3"4'-3"2'-7"5'-5"5'-1"2'-11"1'-0"6'-11"3'-312"4'-812"2'-4"3'-2"7'-0"2'-7"5'-9"3'-3"4'-0"5'-4"15'-10"11'-6"4'-6"11'-9"1'-5"101. 0 6' PC 97.5 9' PC ō+DOOō 5' Required Setback 4'-3"7'-1"3'-11"2'-7"2'-6"4'-5"ō/DXQGU\ō ō%DWKō 4'-5"9'-1" Proposed Setback 9'-1" Proposed Setback 40'-0" ō0DVWHU%HGURRPō ō0DVWHU%DWKō ō/DXQGU\ō ō+HU&ORVHWō ō%HGURRPō ō%HGURRPō ō%DWKō ō%DWKō ō(OHYō 2'-0"38'-0" 2'-8"2'-0"5'-5"6'-10" 40'-0" 35'-6"4'-6" 9'-11"10'-11"13'-9"11"39'-11"13'-4"26'-7"7'-7"5'-9"6'-0"6'-0"7'-6"3'-3"3'-10"40'-0"19'-1"16'-9"2'-1"7'-11"2'-11"5'-5"1'-8"9'-912"6'-012"7'-6"3'-3" 120. 2 2' PC 117. 6 1' PC ō+DOOō ō9HVWLEXOHō 5' Required Setback 5'Required Setback5'Required Setback4'-2"7'-6"1'-4"3'-4"2'-0"3'-11"1'-0"9'-912"3'-812"7'-8"4'-10"6"1'-10"2'-8"4'-1"1'-5"2'-10"5'-11"5'-10"2'-5"7'-11"2'-5" - 7'-10" 103 46'-0" ō.LWFKHQō ō%HGURRPō ō3RZGHUō ō%DWKō ō(OHYō ō/LYLQJō ō'HFNō 13'-11"16'-7"IWò2SHQ6SDFH 49.48% Coverage ō'LQLQJō 2'-5"29'-10"13'-9" 46'-2" 12'-7"9'-7"5'-4"5'-5"13'-3"33'-10"17'-0"1'-0"2'-5"7'-7"8"7'-7"7'-7"33'-10"18'-0"15'-10"101. 0 6' PC 97.5 9' PC 5' Required Setback 5'Required Setback15'-10"3'-6"3'-6"7'-10"6'-7"6'-0"6'-0"1'-11" 6'-512"5'-4"2'-0"3'-5"7'-11"5'-4"6'-6"1'-9"7'-312"6'-012"2'-11"11"3'-612"2'-5"1'-0"1'-6" 9'-1" Proposed Setback 9'-1" Proposed Setback ō.LWFKHQō ō'LQLQJō ō'HFNō ō/LYLQJō ō%DWKō ō(OHYō 18'16.11'IWò2SHQ6SDFH 34.57% Coverage 36'-7" 3'-0" 24'-1"18'-0" 7'-312"11'-6"5'-312" 4'-11"7'-7" 42'-1" 5'-0"35'-0"2'-1" 9'-11"40'-0"27'-0"1'-1"11'-11"7'-0"4'-11"40'-0"20'-0"19'-1"1'-1"2'-812"2'-812"7'-8"2'-0"3'-10"9'-412"10'-712"11"120. 2 2' PC 117. 6 1' PC 3' Required Setback 5'Required Setback5'Required Setback6'-112"6'-512"4.17'2.58' - 6'- 4 " 104 PlanterPlanterDeckBelowDeckBelow14:12 2:122:1214:1214:1214:12 14:1214:12 14:1214:12 Planter RidgeHipHipV a l l e y HipHipValleyHipCP#12144.87 ' ac t144.93 ma x CP#10146.99 ' ac t147.01 max8.94'10.61'16.69'23.39'33.16'37.03'65.78'74.28'77.69'80.36'94.57'5.72' 10.8' 18.47' 44.88' 46.47' CP2CP3CP5CP6CP1CP4 92.52'CP11 CP13 CP7&8 CP9 CP12 CP10 120.22 'PC101.06'PC117.01 'PC97.56'PCCP#9144.87 ' ac t144.93 ma x CP#7144.43 ' ac t144.77 ma xCP#8144.43 ' ac t144.44 maxCP#13141.2 ' ac t141.47 maxCP#11141.2 ' ac t141.26 maxCP#3136.65' act136.99 maxCP#2134.16' act134.51 maxCP#5134.16' act134.50 maxCP#6130.66' act131.17 max CP#4130.66' act131.11 max CP#1131.86' act132.19 max11.51'22.63'37.72'42.3' 26.05'135.42 3'-7" to Eave 5'-0" Clear 3'-0"Clear5'-0"Clear 5'-0" to bld'g 11'-2"to bld'g7'-9"to Eave 9'-1"to bld'g3'-5"Eave 1'-5" Eave 6'-4"Eave9"Eave 2'-5"Eave3"Eave4'-5"Eave2'-1"Eave8" Eave 14:12 ElevequipElevequip-18" = 1'-0"0 2 4 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 5856 60 140 142 144 146 148 158156154152150 160 162 164 166 168 178176174172170 180662646866707274787680828488869092949896100102104108106110112114118116120122124128126130132134138136 105 20'9'109.42'1st Floor FFE100.67'Garage FFE97.59'PC101.06'PC119.67'2nd Floor FFE130.67'Roof Deck FFE100.42'Basement FFE8'-0" Plate Height 9'-3" Plate Height 10'-0" Plate Height5'-0"Setback5'-0"Setbackropertyineropertyine134.51 ma x134.16 ac tua l CP#2136.99 ma x136.65 ac tua l CP#3 7'-0" Door Height 132.19 max131.86 ac tua l CP#1131.17 ma x130.66 ac tua l CP#6134.50 max134.16 actual CP#513 1 . 1 1 m a x 13 0 . 6 6 a c t u a l C P # 4 7'-9" Garage Plate Height 8' 6"109.42'1st Floor FFE119.67'2nd Floor FFE130.67'Roof Deck FFE8'-0" Plate Height 9'-3" Plate Height 10'-0" Plate Height119.87'1st Floor FFE107.2'Garage FFE130.37'2nd Floor FFE141.37'Roof Deck FFE109.87'Basement FFE9'-0"Plate Height 9'-6"Plate Height 9'-10"Plate Height120.23'PC101.06'PC3'-0"Setbackropertyine5'-0"Setbackropertyine144.77 max144.43 actual CP#7 6'-0" Max Fence 3'-6" Max Fence 126.23'Fence109.13'Fence104.56'Fence9'-1"Setback6' MaxHigh Fence 100.67'Garage FFE100.42'Basement FFE11'-8"Garage Plate Height -18" = 1'-0"0 2 4 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 5856 60 140 142 144 146 148 158156154152150 160 162 164 166 168 178176174172170 180662646866707274787680828488869092949896100102104108106110112114118116120122124128126130132134138136 106 9'109.42'1st Floor FFE119.67'2nd Floor FFE130.67'Roof Deck FFE8'-0"Plate Height 9'-3"Plate Height 10'-0"Plate Height 119.87'1st Floor FFE107.2'Garage FFE130.37'2nd Floor FFE141.37'Roof Deck FFE109.87'Basement FFE9'-0" Plate Height 9'-6" Plate Height 9'-10" Plate Height5'-0"Rear Setback3'-0"Rear Setback97.59'PC117.61'PC9'-1"Setbackropertyineropertyine132.19 max131.86 actual CP#1136.99 max136.65 ac tua l CP#3144.44 ma x144.43 ac tua l CP#8147.01 max146.99 ac tua l CP#10134.50 max134.16 actual CP#5141.47 max141.2 actual CP#13141.26 max141.2 ac tua l CP#11145.93 max144.87 ac tua l CP#12 6'-0"Max Fence3'-6"Max Fence 123.61'Fence105.31'Fence102.81'Fence101.09'Fence144.92 max144.87 actual CP#9131.11 max130.66 actual CP#4131.15 max130.66 actual CP#6134.51 max134.16 actual CP#2100.67'Garage FFE100.42'Basement FFE11'-8" Garage Plate Height 119.87'1st Floor FFE107.2'Garage FFE130.37'2nd Floor FFE141.37'Roof Deck FFE109.87'Basement FFE9'-0"Plate Height 9'-6"Plate Height 9'-10"Plate Height117.61'PC120.23'PC5'-0"Setbackropertyine5'-0"Setbackropertyine6'-0"Max Fence123.61'Fence126.47'Fence11'-8"Garage Plate Height -18" = 1'-0"0 2 4 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 5856 60 140 142 144 146 148 158156154152150 160 162 164 166 168 178176174172170 180662646866707274787680828488869092949896100102104108106110112114118116120122124128126130132134138136 107 -18" = 1'-0"0 2 4 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 5856 60 140 142 144 146 148 158156154152150 160 162 164 166 168 178176174172170 180662646866707274787680828488869092949896100102104108106110112114118116120122124128126130132134138136 108 Longfellow Ave Subject Property9.09'9.09'9.09'9.09'9.26'9.09'9.26'9.18'9.18'8.51'AlleyArdmore Ave638 & 640 Longfellow634 & 636 Longfellow630 & 632 Longfellow622 & 624 Longfellow618 & 620 Longfellow614 & 616 Longfellow610 & 612 Longfellow606 & 608 Longfellow602 & 604 Longfellow109 110 Poster Verification 111 112 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 19-0685 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Regular Meeting of October 15, 2019 PDP 19-11- Precise Development Plan Amendment to extend the building permit expiration date, pursuant to Section 15.04.050 of the Municipal Code, for a mixed use building at 2700 Manhattan Avenue Applicant:R.G. West Corporation 1600 Sawtelle Blvd, #100 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Property Owner Five Corners LLC 7800 Berger Avenue Playa Del Rey, CA 90293 Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution amending the Precise Development Plan to extend the building permit expiration date one additional year. Executive Summary: The applicant is requesting to extend the building permit expiration date an additional year from the date of this hearing. The building permit is otherwise limited to a period of two years, with two six- month extensions allowed to be granted by the Building Official. The Planning Commission has the authority to consider this extension pursuant to the recent amendments to Municipal Code Section 15.04.050, which authorize the Planning Commission to set alternate building permit schedules through the entitlement process. Background: The Planning Commission approved a Precise Development Plan for a three-story mixed use building with subterranean parking, a snack shop and three apartments. Building permits were issued June 9, 2016 and construction started immediately after permit issuance. Section 15.04.050 of the Municipal Code establishes that building permits expire within two years of the date of issuance of the permit. The Building Official has also granted two 6-month extensions and the current expiration date, based on when the latest extension was granted was June 19, 2018. The intervening time between that date and this report has been spent assisting the applicant to prepare their schedule and complete their application to demonstrate their commitment to finishing the project within the City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™113 Staff Report REPORT 19-0685 requested extension period. The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission consider further extension of the building permit in order to complete the project. In response to staff, the applicant has provided a detailed construction schedule (attached) prepared by the contractor which indicates that the project will be complete within the next 6 months (April 2020). However, staff believes it more realistic to grant the full year to June 6, 2020. Also, the contractor has called for inspections, most recently on September 23, 2019, showing progress aligns with their construction schedule (rough mechanical for the residential units signed off). It should be noted that some inspections listed in the Project Schedule have been “partial” and not complete inspections. For example, “rough framing” is listed more than once, and indicates specific areas that have been inspected, but there has not been a “final rough framing” inspection as yet. Section 15.04.050 of the Municipal Code pertaining to expiration of permits was recently amended by the City Council in January 2018, based on recommendations from the Planning Commission, to provide flexibility for the Commission to allow longer periods for discretionary projects because of their size and complexity. Since the subject project was approved before this amendment, there was no opportunity to request or consider a longer construction period at the time of the initial application and project approval. Due to the project’s size and complexity and challenges of a constrained site, a longer than two year period would have been a reasonable condition had the applicant been able to and requested a longer period at the time of original approval. Now that the code has been changed to create this opportunity, the developer is requesting this consideration. Analysis: The project delays have raised concerns from neighbors as well as City Council. The builder’s delays are described in the attachment due to issues related to the deep excavations, and performance of subcontractors, as well as revisions to structural plans. The Building Official has corroborated the difficulties this builder has faced. The builder now plans to complete the project and has provided a reasonable and achievable construction schedule. Based on our Building Official and the Inspector’s assessment, the project is about 70% done, and the exterior scaffolding is about to be removed when the exterior finish work is complete. Staff has requested financial information to provide assurance that sufficient funding is available or has been secured to complete the project, which we have not received at this time. This is the second time the Commission has received a request for a time extension under the new provisions in the code. As noted above, this developer did not have the opportunity to request additional time at the outset to address the project challenges because the provision was not available as an option in the Code. The city added this authorization upon determining that some projects require more than two years to complete. While moving forward this will be handled at the entitlement stage, staff supports the request to have the Planning Commission amend the PDP to provide a later expiration date for the building permits. Staff believes that given that the project is almost done and the commitment of the developer to complete the project, supported by the City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™114 Staff Report REPORT 19-0685 construction schedule, and recent inspection activity, that this extension is the best option for the developer and City to see this project through completion. California Environmental Quality Act: The proposed extension is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, as it is not a project under CEQA. The project is 70% completed and this decision will allow the developer to complete the already approved project. Summary: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the requested amendment to the Precise Development Plan to allow the applicant the additional time needed to complete the project. Attachments: 1.Proposed Resolution 2.P.C. Resolution 14-1 (2700 Manhattan Ave) 3.Site Photos and Public Notice Posters 4.Notification Radius 5.Applicant Submittal Including Construction Schedule 6.Public Comment Letter- Gary Mammet 7.Public Comment Letter- Tony Higgins Respectfully Submitted by: Bob Rollins, Building and Code Enforcement Official Approved: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™115 65270.00001\32121682.1 1 P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 19-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO EXTEND THE BUILDING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.04.050 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, FOR MIXED USE BUILDING CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT 2700 MANHATTAN AVENUE AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT A PROJECT UNDER CEQA The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application for an amendment to Precise Development Plan No.13-5 was filed by the property owner, Five Corners LLC, requesting extension of the building permit expiration for a mixed use building at 2700 Manhattan Avenue. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the subject application on October 15, 2019, at which time testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission Section 3. Pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 15.04.050, pertaining to building permit expiration, the Planning Commission may establish a different permit expiration date for discretionary projects. The subject project was granted a discretionary Precise Development Plan in October of 2015. (Planning Commission Resolution 14-1) Section 4. The Planning Commission considered the staff report, testimony and evidence, both written and oral, presented to the Commission. Due to the project’s size and complexity and challenges of a constrained site, the Planning Commission finds that a longer than two year period for the building permit is appropriate for this project. Section 5. The proposed extension is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(a), because the extension of time to complete a construction project that is already near completion will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Section 6. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves an amendment to Precise Development Plan, as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution 14- 1 to add a new condition to read as follows. All other parts of Planning Commission Resolution 14-1 remain unchanged. 41. Under Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 15.04.050, the Building Permits for the subject project shall expire on June 6, 2020. Section 7. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. 116 65270.00001\32121682.1 2 VOTE: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. No. 19-XX is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of October 15, 2019. David Pedersen, Chair Ken Robertson, Secretary Date 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 Site Photos and Public Notice Posters 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 From:tony higgins To:DG_PlanningCommission Subject:Fwd: Public Notice re 2700 Manhattan project extension Date:Monday, October 07, 2019 11:13:24 AM Attachments:2700 Manhattan Ave extension.pdf FYI and consideration Subject: Fwd: Public Notice re 2700 Manhattan project extension Dear City Council. Re: construction project delays I believe city has a significant problem with residential and commercialconstruction projects often taking 3-5 years to complete. The project just 30ft from my open windows has been going on for at least 4 years. The attached public hearing notice from Ken Robertson regarding an extensionfor the 2700 Manhattan project (aka 5 corners black hole) also illustrates this point. As an example, whether it’s 2 people hammering away on a plywood-drum for 2months or 10 people hammering for 2 weeks the noise disturbance to the neighborhood is roughly the same. 2 weeks is better. Timely completion matters to residents. Far too many projects are taking 3-5 years+ to complete. Is there a way that performance bonds can be required and keyed to projectphases like demolition, framing, etc., to incentivize timely completion of each major phase of the construction. These performance bonds would be forfeited if the contractor applies for anextension. Any extension would require another performance bond at say double the value. It’s time for the city to get serious about project timeline over-runs and start to look out for residents interests in a meaningful and substantial way. Thank youAnthony Higgins Begin forwarded message: From: Gary Mammet <gary@mammet.net> 155 Date: October 5, 2019 at 4:22:06 PM PDTTo: tony higgins <tony.higgins123@gmail.com> Subject: Public Notice FYI   Endless Project is perfect example for a Performance Bond 156 From: Brown Dennis <dab@dennisabrown.com> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 4:00 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@hermosabch.org>; City Clerk <cityclerk@hermosabch.org>; Suja Lowenthal <suja@hermosabch.org>; Elaine Doerfling <edoerfling@hermosabch.org>; Ken Robertson <krobertson@hermosabch.org> Cc: Bobbi <bobbi@dennisabrown.com>; Gary Mammet <gary@mammet.net>; tony.higgins123@gmail.com Subject: 2700 MANHATTAN AVENUE We live two doors away from 2700 Manhattan Ave. With regard to the current Public Notice from Ken Robertson, Community Development Department regarding extending the building permit expiration date for this property please see that this correspondence is included as a matter of record. This property has been under construction for FOUR YEARS. As of now there are three other properties that are also undergoing ground-up construction on all sides of us and within 40’ of us. Within a block there are three other ground-up constructions going on for a total of seven. The Hermosa Beach Municipal Code states: ‘The purpose of this chapter is to strike a balance between normal, everyday noises that are unavoidable in an urban environment and those noises that are so excessive and annoying that they must be curtailed in order to protect the comfort and tranquility of all persons who live and work in the city. (Ord. 07-1285 §1, 2007)’ The excessive noise, dirt, dust and blocked access to 28th Court starts at 8AM six days a week. This is not the Hermosa Beach we moved to 21 years ago. This must be curtailed. We urge you to extend the building permit with two provisions: 1. For six months only at a very hefty fee 2. That if the construction is not completed in six months the property is deeded to the city and will be disposed of. Further we urge you to adopt a regulation that limits the number of construction projects within a reasonable distance of a residence. We would suggest no more than two at a time within 500’ of a residence. Thank you … Dennis & Bobbi Brown 225 27th Street 157 Memorandum Date: October 15, 2019 To: Planning Commission From: Bob Rollins, Building/Code Enforcement Official Re: Supplemental Documents for 2700 Manhattan Avenue At the request of staff, the applicant has submitted the attached revised construction schedule and request for extension. These documents reflect more closely the current state of construction and intentions to complete the project within the time frame requested. The Building Division verifies that progress is as described in these documents; that the majority of “rough” inspections have been completed, and that the exterior of the building is ready to be weather proofed. Once weather proofing is installed and all the “rough” inspections completed, interior finishes; drywall, floor coverings, and plumbing and electric fixtures can be installed. As there is ample off street parking in the subterranean garage, the installation, painting, etc., can progress with minimal impact on the neighborhood. Regards, Bob Rollins Building/Code Enforcement Official 158 R. G. WEST A California Corporation 1600 Sawtelle Blvd. Suite 100, Los Angeles, CA 90025 Tel (310) 575 - 3082 Fax (310) 575-3092 October 8, 2019 Page 1 Ken Robertson Director, Community Development Department. City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach 90254 Re: 2700 Manhattan Ave. Permit Expiration & Extension Request Dear Mr. Robertson, This is a follow up to our letter dated August 8th with a request for an extension on our project. Please know that we are working diligently, around the clock to complete the construction at 2700 Manhattan Avenue and we have already secured most of the contracts left to complete the project at our earliest possible. I wanted to elaborate on the reasons behind our request for the extension and share an update with you in support of our request. As you likely know, we had two freezes on our project. However, the second freeze lasted 167 days. This forced the resignation of our steel contractor, as well as several of our other contractors, as they had other contractual obligations to clients beyond our project. The delays that forced our contractors to move out, complicated the continuation of this project immensely. By this point, the remaining work to be done was far less complicated and could easily categorize into two parts: Part 1 - The Basement parking and 1st Floor Commercial: Both of which only required steel construction with non-bearing wood partitions. Part 2 - The residential 2nd and 3rd Floors: where most of the structure is made almost entirely of wood. After all the utility work was completed on the residential floors, we received authorization to lath the exterior of the upper floors. However, we next, received a notice stating that unless both parts of the building’s utilities were ready for rough inspection, we were not authorized to proceed with the upper floor rough framing approval. Therefore, all contractors for insulation, drywall and cement plaster and the others following them had to extend their time! The approval of the upper floors framing shall tremendously accelerate our progress and allow us to place the cement plaster on the upper residential floors and remove the scaffolding much sooner. (The above mentioned process is being performed in multi-floor buildings because of its efficiency). 159 R. G. WEST A California Corporation 1600 Sawtelle Blvd. Suite 100, Los Angeles, CA 90025 Tel (310) 575 - 3082 Fax (310) 575-3092 Page 2 Actually, today we didn’t pass the HV/AC duct work in the basement parking, requiring additional clarifications from the engineer while residential floors were passed on 9/23/2019! The incongruent timing of authorizations, approvals, inspections, and required pauses have added an extra twist in complexity to this project and caused unforeseen delays. Despite these significant setbacks, we have steadfastly been driving forward. Currently, we are working hard to get the utility rough approval for the lower part of the project. Beyond these, we are also on track to finish the project close to the previously submitted schedule - If no more revisions are required -. For your review, we have prepared the latest progress schedule showing the impact of the combining the two parts of the building inspection. We reduced the time to most of the finished work to hopefully compensate the delay, so you can not only see our progress, but the remaining elements that are left to complete. R.G. West has been in business for over 40 years. We have a spotless, solid reputation and we are known for our accuracy, speed and efficiency. We respectfully ask that you please consider allowance of the Residential section to move forward while we are preparing the Commercial section for rough approvals. And by extending our permit to allow us to complete the last leg of this project seamlessly. I welcome you to contact me directly, should you have any questions or concerns. I am at your disposal. Thank you kindly. Sincerely, Kemal Ramezani President 160 2700 Mnhattan Ave, Hermosa tseach, CA 90254 PROGRESS SCHEDULE CONTINUATION 112 t1 i2 :J 141 I Guard rails 5 days Mon 7122119 Fri 7126t19 i z -nanoraits s days Mon 7129119 Fri Bl2l19 ; . ...... . . .......!--,---- - -_3 lSheei metal - -5 days tlionTtXld - F;lt2iigl ; 4 ;Water proofing, 1st coat 5 days Mon B/5/19 Fri 8i9l19 5 i Exterior door & window 5 days Mon 8/12119 Fri 8/16119 i .........1_- --,,-1,,.,.o iHvncunrts----.'-- -_-1ta;t;---l,tlon7l22l19 ni alel19i :z ' fnspeCtion, flVlAC 44 days Mon B/12l19 fhu lOltrjlts'....--.-..],_ -- B *--iElectrical, Rough - 15 days ----lvt;" 72t19 - -rri e/g/i5l 9 : lnspection, Electrical 47 days Mon B/12l19 Tue 10/15/19 T0 F eSprinklerlnstallatron 10 days Mon7l22l19 FriS/2119 11 : lnspection, Fire sprinkler 45 days Mon 8/5/19 Fri 1ol4l19: 12 i Framing Rough 1 day Fri 10111119 Fri 1O111119 : ;..-. . .rc ilndpecilonframing - tatJ ..-Mon 10744719-Tue 10/15/19 i 14 i trash chute 25 days Mon7l22l19 ,i Fri 8123119, f---_l ! 15 rKitchen Hood 25 days Mon7l22l19 Fri Bl23l19 16 i Roofing, Built-up 5 days Mon 8/26119 Fri B/30/19 . :V..____.._. _rue 10129119 im Fri 10/18/19 l 19 : lnspection, Shower Pans 5 da),s ^Iion 1U2U1g' 20 i Storefront 5 days Wed 10/16i19 Tue 10122119 F oavi-weo orni,21 i Plaster Lathing 22 i lnspection, lathing 2 days Wed 10/23/19 Thu 10/24119 : 23 i lnsulation 5 days Fri 10125119 Thu 1 0/31/1 9 i 24 i lnspection, lnsulation 2 days Fri 1111119 Mon 1114119. 25 i lnterior door frames 10 days Fri 10125119 fhu 1117119 rnluzzTle:----]26 Drywall 14 days Tue 11l5/19 ..._. . .i-----27 ilnspection, Drywall 5 days Mon 1 1/2511 I Fri 11129119 Fri 1216119 :28 i Stucco scratch Coat 5 days Mon 1212119 )s rrght werght Concrete 5 dar - r'1to;l2i1n9 Fri 1216119 : 30 Elevator 30 days Mon 1212119 Fri 1110120 Fri 1212A119 :31 iDrywall Skim Coat and sand 10 days Mon 1219/19 32 - Farntrns Prime Coat --15 days Mon 12123119 Fri 1110120 33 i Stucco Brown Coat 5 days Mon 12123119 Fri 12127119 25 days Mon 12130/19 Fri 1131120 35 i lnterior flooring 20 days Mon 1/6i20 Fri 1131120 36 I Stucco Finish to oays - vton ttzotzo rt uiitiO: 37 I Deck Waterproofing final 5 days Man 2/3/20 Fri 2l7l2O 38 i Deck Tiling 10 days Mon2l10l20 Fri 2121120 39 iCabinets&Shelving 25 days Mon 1l20l2o Fti 2121l2O I 40 i lnterior Doors & Hardware 20 days Mon 1l20l2o Fri 2l14l2O : Counter Tops & splash 15 days Mon 2124120 Fri 3113120 Painting 20 days Mon 3/16/20 Fri 4110120:-'-- Ftl4n4tnTPlumbing fixtures 10 days Mon 4l13l2A Light fixtures & signs 10 days Mon 4113120 Fri 4124120 : i Punch i Final List & Clean-up 12 days Mon 4l13l2Q Tue 4128120: 2 days Wed 4129120 fhu 4130120 161 From: Sandy Edmonstone [mailto:sandy.edmonstone@cationcapital.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 4:07 PM To: Bob Rollins Cc: Nicole Ellis Subject: Re: 2700 Manhattan Avenue Assessor Parcel No. 4181-023-002 Thanks Bob, I very much appreciate your time and assistance with ensuring this is submitted. If you could confirm receipt of this I would appreciate it. S October 15, 2019, Re: 2700 Manhattan Avenue Assessor Parcel No. 4181-023-002 My name is Sandy Edmonstone and I own the property at 146 28th St. directly across the street from 2700 Manhattan Ave. I apologize for not writing in sooner, my travel schedule only permitted me to receive the notice yesterday October 13, 2019. Receiving this notice was extremely troubling as the project at 2700 Manhattan Ave has caused havoc for our community since 2015 and the City has condoned this conduct by granting multiple, building permit extensions. Clearly, the owner of 2700 Manhattan Ave has little regard for the City of Hermosa Beach, its by- laws and rules and no respect for their neighboring residents and community. By further extending this permit you are further enabling the owners to conduct themselves in a manner unbecoming to Hermosa Beach. Someone on council should really ask the question what kind of landlord you are inviting into our community and whether this council will actually be held directly accountable for future problems associated with 2700 Manhattan Ave. (thinking there will not be any is extremely naïve). Questioning how this property owner will conduct itself once the development is complete is imperative (do you think it will care who their tenants are?). Allowing this to continue is effectively having the City turn its back on the many property taxpayers impacted by this. We pay the City property taxes in exchange for services, governance and protection so please protect us. I find it interesting that along with the notice for an extension the City has not provided the community with complete transparency with respect to 2700 Manhattan Ave. Why haven’t the countless violations, citations and warnings that have been associated with the development at 2700 Manhattan Ave. been disclosed? In order to have an honest discussion about whether this extension is in the community’s best interest the City needs to provide full disclosure. What have we dealt with? Starting and finishing times not being followed, changing building plans, extremely dirty building site and debris from the site blowing onto neighbouring properties, safety hazards as the site has not been kept secure, project timelines constantly not being meet and extensions provided, enhanced traffic issues given the trade vehicles at the site causing congestion at an already dangerous intersection, neighborhood parking stalls being consumed and blocked constantly, illegally having vicious dogs occupy the property at night scaring the residents walking by on the side walk and making loud noises at night preventing people from sleeping, squatters illegally residing on the property, site workers parking camping trailers in the complex living in them while on the project, workers conducting work at the site well past the expiry of their permit in June of 2019 (well documented) and this is only what I experienced. I am sure the City has numerous other examples it could be sharing but are intentionally silent on. 162 I was fortunate to be able to come into the community and purchase a new home developed by local builders who cared about the project but equally cared about the community. I understand that new development eventually leads to increased property values and a better community and as such I have no issue with development as long as it follows the City’s rules and respects the community. The owners at 2700 Manhattan Ave have not complied with either and as such are not worthy of a further permit extension. I respect that the City is submitting a two year window to complete this was aggressive but the property owner has already enjoyed two extensions increasing the build time by 50%. If the project cannot be completed, then the owners should be forced to divest the property in an open market transaction and allow a new developer an opportunity to come in that will respect the community and finish the project based on the stated timelines. The community has lived with an eyesore for 4 plus years and it doesn’t appear that an end is near. The value of the neighboring properties has been diminished because of the disaster at 2700 Manhattan Ave yet the City is still charging the affected property owners full freight property tax wise. The City has exercised its discretion in extending the permits and as an unintended consequence has created this value impairment without providing a property tax rebate for affected property owners. Presumably, if the owner has not met the timelines for the permit the City has the ability to fine and add administrative costs to the extension, part of these costs should subsidize the impacted property owner’s property taxes. When the 2700 Manhattan Ave. project originally started, I received a notice in the mail from the contractor identifying the project and contractor and how to get a hold of them. I have called that number provided by the contractor at least a dozen times and have never received a return call. Doesn’t this seem like a good indication of how much the property owners care about the community? The project has been extremely messy and has caused damage to neighboring properties. No one has taken responsibility for it because we can’t get a hold of anyone. The only recourse we have is legal action unless the City prevents the permit extension to be granted until the property owner deals with its neighbours in good faith. Prior to this project I was powering washing my home annually and since the project started, I have had to do it three times per annum. Again, I have no problem with development and am prepared to bear this cost but only during a reasonable development period not four plus years. This development is causing neighbors extensive and unreasonable out of pocket costs to care for their property’s when all the benefit is accruing to the owner of 2700 Manhattan Ave., this is not symmetric. To conclude, this project has been nothing short of a disaster and a stain on the community. The City needs to be doing a better job of protecting its taxpayers and taking action to correct the damage caused by previous extensions. I am NOT in support of the extension. If this property owner is to get an extension then it must be mandated, it complies with the City’s rules, respects the community and deals with outstanding issues with the residents impacted by the development. Frankly, it’s appalling the City is considering another extension when the owner still has not yet provided the necessary financial assurance the project can be completed. Why is the cart being put in front of the horse? This is not necessary and just further adds to the stain of this developer which is being endorsed by the City. Please stand up and protect our community even at the cost of this development. The development has had many chances and the City needs to set a precedent to prevent future occurrences like this one. I appreciate your time and consideration. Sincerely, Sandy Edmonstone 146-28th St Hermosa Beach 310-972-1737 163 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 19-0683 Honorable Chair and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Regular Meeting of October 15, 2019 Draft Coastal Zone Parking Assessment & Recommendations Background: As part of the City of Hermosa Beach’s efforts to obtain a certified Local Coastal Program,the City obtained a grant from the California Coastal Commission to conduct technical studies and develop a draft Coastal Land Use Plan and Implementation Plan that cover a range of topics from sea level rise, overnight accommodations, and parking resources. Over the past 18 months,the City hired a technical consultant to assist in evaluating the City’s current parking resources and programs and evaluating opportunities to improve the availability of parking resources in the Coastal Zone in a manner that balances coastal access requirements with efficient use of the City’s limited land resources and achievement of the City’s economic development and mobility goals. Staff began conducting a series of stakeholder meetings over the last month,presenting the draft report to the stakeholder group and engaging their feedback.A City Council Study Session was held on October 2,2019,where the community was provided an opportunity to provide their input and Council discussed the recommendations contained within the report. Overview: Staff will cover the following elements of the Parking Assessment before diving into a discussion of the recommendations and relative priorities for implementation. The agenda for this topic includes: ·Study Purpose, Goals, & Process ·Inventory & Zone Characteristics ·Occupancy & Demand Analysis ·Recommendations & Best Practices ·Stakeholder Feedback ·City Council Feedback ·Study Next Steps & Discussion City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™164 Staff Report REPORT 19-0683 Discussion Questions: To help frame the discussion, staff seeks input and feedback from the Planning Commission and the community on the following questions: 1.Which of the strategies interest you most? 2.Do you have feedback or concerns about any of the recommendations? 3.Do you think we have missed any general areas of recommendations? 4.Do you agree with the relative priorities identified for near- and long-term solutions? 5.Do you have recommendations on best practices we should look at that you’ve seen in other communities that you think work well? Next Steps: In order to realize the goals of this study, a series of procedural steps is needed to implement the recommendations. A series of next steps is outlined below: ·Review/Approval of Study by City Council ·Updates to Local Coastal Program Reviewed by Planning Commission and Council ·Review by Coastal Commission ·Implementation of Strategies Attachments: 1.Coastal Zone Parking Assessment Draft Report 2.Coastal Zone Parking Assessment Summary Handout 3.Presentation Slides Respectfully Submitted by: Leeanne Singleton, AICP, Environmental Analyst Approved: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™165 1 166 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 2 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. 2 LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 5 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 5 STUDY GOALS .............................................................................................................................. 6 RELEVANT PLANS ......................................................................................................................... 7 PROJECT PROCESS ..................................................................................................................... 8 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS & PARKING INVENTORY .................................................................... 10 STUDY AREA CHARACTERISTICS .............................................................................................. 10 PARKING DATA SOURCES ........................................................................................................ 10 ZONE DEVELOPMENT AND CHARACTERISTICS ...................................................................... 12 INVENTORY OF PARKING ......................................................................................................... 23 EXISTING PARKING MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS ................................................................... 24 Parking Fees .................................................................................................................... 24 Residential Parking Permit Program ............................................................................. 24 Daily Parking Permit Program ........................................................................................ 24 Employee Parking Permit Program ............................................................................... 24 Off-Street Parking Requirements ................................................................................. 25 3. PARKING OCCUPANCY ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 27 OVERALL OCCUPANCY SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 27 OCCUPANCY BY ZONE ............................................................................................................ 28 OCCUPANCY BY ON AND OFF-STREET PARKING .................................................................. 31 On-Street Parking ............................................................................................................ 31 Off-Street Parking (Public and Private) ........................................................................ 32 OCCUPANCY BY SPACE TYPE ................................................................................................. 33 On-Street Parking ............................................................................................................ 35 Off-Street Parking (Public and Private) ........................................................................ 35 KEY TAKEAWAYS ........................................................................................................................ 36 4. PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 37 167 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 3 PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 37 Code Requirements for Existing Non-Residential Uses ............................................... 38 Actual Built Parking Ratios ............................................................................................. 43 ANTICIPATED PEAK PARKING DEMAND.................................................................................. 44 ANTICIPATED SEASONAL PARKING DEMAND ........................................................................ 49 ANTICIPATED FUTURE PARKING DEMAND .............................................................................. 51 KEY TAKEAWAYS ........................................................................................................................ 52 5. RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................... 53 DEVELOPMENT OF RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................. 56 STRATEGICALLY INVEST IN INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY ........................................... 56 MAXIMIZE USE OF EXISTING PARKING SUPPLY ........................................................................ 61 IMPROVE MOBILITY OPTIONS TO REDUCE PARKING DEMAND ............................................ 63 SIMPLIFY AND LEVERAGE THE ZONING CODE ....................................................................... 65 ENHANCE PARKING ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATIONS ................................................... 68 PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PARKING AS NEEDED ........................................................... 74 APPENDIX A ......................................................................................................................................... 77 APPENDIX B ......................................................................................................................................... 78 APPENDIX C ......................................................................................................................................... 79 C.1 VICTORIA TRANSPORTATION POLICY INSTITUTE .............................................................. 79 C.2 PORTLAND, OR REDUCED PARKING FOR MIXED-USE AREAS PROVISION .................... 80 C.3 PETCO PARK AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY ................................................................. 80 168 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 4 List of Figures Figure 1.1 – Project Timeline ................................................................................................................ 8 Figure 2.1 – Study Area Map ............................................................................................................. 11 Figure 2.2 – Zone 1 Boundary Map .................................................................................................. 14 Figure 2.3 – Zone 2 Boundary Map .................................................................................................. 15 Figure 2.4 – Zone 3 Boundary Map .................................................................................................. 16 Figure 2.5 – Zone 4 Boundary Map .................................................................................................. 17 Figure 2.6 – Zone 5 Boundary Map .................................................................................................. 17 Figure 2.7 – Zone 6 Boundary Map .................................................................................................. 19 Figure 2.8 – Zone 7 Boundary Map .................................................................................................. 20 Figure 2.9 – Zone 8 Boundary Map .................................................................................................. 21 Figure 3.1 – On-Street Parking Occupancy by Zone ..................................................................... 32 Figure 3.2 – Off-Street Parking by Zone............................................................................................ 32 Figure 4.1 – Map of Observed Non-Residential Land Uses ........................................................... 42 List of Tables Table 2.1 – Zone Descriptions and Parking Types ........................................................................... 22 Table 2.2 – Coastal Zone Parking Space Inventory by Zone ........................................................ 23 Table 2.3 – Coastal Zone Parking Space Inventory ....................................................................... 23 Table 2.4 – Hermosa Beach Off-Street Parking Requirements ..................................................... 25 Table 3.1– Summary of Overall Occupancy per Zone .................................................................. 28 Table 4.1 – Non-Residential Parking Spaces Required by City Code ......................................... 39 Table 4.2 – Actual Built Parking Ratios for Non-Residential Land Uses ......................................... 43 Table 4.3 – Anticipated Peak Parking Demand Rates for Non-Residential Land Uses ............. 46 Table 4.4 – Non-Residential Parking Demand by Number of Parking Spaces ........................... 47 Table 4.5 – Anticipated Peak Parking Demand Ratios ................................................................. 49 Table 4.6 – Seasonal Parking Demand ............................................................................................ 50 Table 5.1 – Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 53 Table 5.2 – Recommendations Matrix ............................................................................................. 55 169 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 5 1. Introduction A sunny small beach city of 1.4 square miles, Hermosa Beach sits at the center of Los Angeles County’s South Bay coastline along the Santa Monica Bay. The town is the very essence of the Southern California lifestyle, with an average of 283 sunny days per year and nighttime temperatures that rarely dip below 50 degrees. With two miles of sandy beach shoreline, Hermosa attracts more than a million visitors to the beach each year. The small-town charm of Hermosa Beach is highlighted in commercial areas like Pier Avenue, well known for its many diverse restaurants and local retailers. There are architecturally diverse residences on the Strand, bungalows scattered throughout the town, and multi-level homes with ocean views. Outdoor activities such as beach volleyball, surfing, skateboarding, and biking are quintessential to the Hermosa Beach culture. Other favorite activities include jogging or walking along the Greenbelt or the Strand, the paved path paralleling the beach and connecting Hermosa Beach to cities up and down the Santa Monica Bay coastline. This lively beach city is also well known for its entertainment offerings including live music from rock to blues to jazz. Festivals, special events, and summer concerts occur throughout the year. The three-day weekends of Memorial Day and Labor Day bring thousands of visitors to the Fiesta Hermosa street fair, which has been a tradition for many years, features hundreds of crafters and artists and live bands. Home to nearly 20,000 residents, Hermosa Beach is within a short commute of many of the largest and best-known names in corporate America in the aerospace, tech, industrial, service and financial fields. The Hermosa Beach City School District, consistently recognized as a California Distinguished School, offers a high-quality education to students in kindergarten through eighth grade, while high schoolers attend Mira Costa or Redondo Union High Schools. The City of Hermosa Beach has recently completed a planning process to define the community’s vision for the future of the City. Elements of the community vision have identified the need for increased management of the City’s parking resources within the Hermosa Beach Coastal Zone. This technical report summarizes the findings of a parking management study conducted for both public and private parking within the Coastal Zone and provides associated recommendations for refining parking standards in the study area. Purpose The evaluation of parking within the Coastal Zone is primarily based on comparing existing parking inventory to both parking occupancy and demand, which ultimately inform specific recommendations based upon the analysis to achieve optimal utilization levels of parking resources. To this end, this report considers the goals and objectives from previous Hermosa Beach plans and studies, industry standards, and best practices that form foundational recommendations that the City of Hermosa Beach can implement to balance the parking needs for residents, visitors, and employees alike. This report is intended to provide additional parking analysis and related parking management strategies to satisfy the requirements set forth in the California Coastal Act. The study evaluates future parking availability and demand, based on the previously completed 170 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 6 parking utilization study (City of Hermosa Beach, Beach Access and Parking Study, January 2015), and with proposed parking strategies from the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy, the City Facilities Master Plan, and the effect of parking policies and multimodal enhancements proposed within PLAN Hermosa. This study includes a review of the City’s current parking standards for various uses, identifies peak use times, and collects data from businesses to determine existing parking availability and demand. This study will form the basis to establish and/or revise parking standards and recommend adjustments to residential and employee parking permit and fee programs within the Coastal Zone to balance coastal access with efficient use of the City’s limited land resources and achievement of the City’s economic development and mobility goals. The results of this study includes recommended parking standards and/or fee rates for various uses within the Coastal Zone and specifically the Downtown Core. This study has four main sections: 1. Existing Conditions & Parking Inventory – this section documents the characteristics of the study area, the inventory of parking within the study area, and the City’s existing parking code requirements and programs to manage parking within the Coastal Zone. 2. Parking Occupancy Analysis – –This section also provides a detailed description of occupancy (utilization) counts by both zone and type, and by time of day and week. 3. Parking Demand Analysis – compares the occupancy rates to existing City parking code, peer city parking rates, and industry standard rates to determine the appropriateness of current minimum parking requirements. The purpose of this analysis was to assist in determining how to optimize parking within the study area for each of the defined zones. 4. Recommendations – The results of the inventory, occupancy, and demand analyses ultimately drive the Recommendations, and are aligned with the goals and objectives from PLAN Hermosa, the Beach Access and Parking Study, and the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy. The recommendations made in this report draw from best practices by peer cities and industry-wide standards as guidance, and have been tailored to address the unique features of Hermosa Beach’s infrastructure, character, and geography. Study Goals The goals and objectives of this study were developed based on the current goals and objectives found in PLAN Hermosa and the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy. Establishing these goals provides a guide for the recommendations in Section 6 that will focus and streamline the approach necessary to improve the parking within the City’s Coastal Zone: 1. Create a parking system that meets the parking needs and demands of residents, visitors, and employees in an efficient and cost-effective manner. This goal is established in the Mobility chapter of PLAN Hermosa. The goal in PLAN Hermosa is accompanied with numerous actionable parking-related objectives, which were incorporated into the recommendations section of this report. 2. Modify parking standards to encourage revitalization and investment in a pedestrian- oriented district. 171 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 7 This goal is a summarization of a critical parking strategy found in the Hermosa Beach Downtown Core Revitalization Plan. While Hermosa Beach looks to relieve its parking congestion, the City is focused on assuring that its small-scale, pedestrian-oriented character is not hindered by parking standards that are more appropriate for suburban auto-oriented areas or require ground floors to be dominated by parking due to smaller lot sizes. 3. Expand mobility options and optimize parking availability. The analysis of the inventory, occupancy, and anticipated demand for parking demonstrate that parking challenges vary by area, time, and type and a nuanced approach to optimizing the availability of parking will be required. In some cases, increasing parking supply may not be the most effective method, and instead implementing a park-once strategy, expanding safe and convenient mobility options, or implementing shared parking agreements between uses with different peak periods could help to improve availability of parking. Most recommendations presented in this report use strategic parking management methods to achieve this goal. Some strategies to reduce demand include maximizing the use of the existing parking supply to better distribute demand, strategically investing in information and technology, and improving mobility options. Relevant Plans Over the past three years the City has initiated several important and forward-thinking planning processes to define the community vision for the future of Hermosa Beach. The City of Hermosa Beach has adopted numerous planning documents that were used to guide the development of this report. These previous plans include: • PLAN Hermosa (2017) • The City of Hermosa Beach: Beach Access and Parking Study (2015) by Fehr & Peers • The City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy (2015) by ROMA Design Group 172 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 8 These three documents are outlined in greater detail below. PLAN Hermosa (2017) – The City of Hermosa Beach has recently completed a multi-faceted process to vision the future of the community by integrating the General Plan and Local Coastal Program into PLAN Hermosa, adopted in August 2017. The City is ensuring a comprehensive review of the community’s needs through outreach with its residents to discuss needs and continued development opportunities. Using community input as the backbone for planning updates, the City is conducting various technical studies to complete and certify their Local Coastal Program (LCP). The LCP identified multiple initiatives including sea level rise, affordable accommodations, and parking management to better serve residents, employees, and visitors of Hermosa Beach. PLAN Hermosa’s Mobility section recognizes that the City is continuing to attract higher numbers of visitors from surrounding areas with diverse and changing mobility demands. Beach Access and Parking Study (2015) - In an effort to evaluate the existing conditions of parking management, the Beach Access and Parking Study was prepared for the Coastal Zone. The study notes that an appropriate quantity of well-managed automobile parking is necessary for the success of the City’s businesses and for the quality of life of its car-owning residents. The study also found that efficient management of parking can help provide sufficient space for vehicles while also encouraging more effective use of existing facilities to reduce the impact of parking facilities and reduce automobile use. Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy (2015) - In February of 2015, the Hermosa Beach City Council accepted the Hermosa Beach Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy, a guiding document to improve upon the pedestrian-oriented area, referred to as the “Downtown Core.” The study defined the Downtown Core as the area from the Strand to Hermosa Avenue between 14th Street and 10th Street, as well as along Pier Avenue from the Pier east to Valley Drive. The objective of this plan was to create a strategy that maintains the small-town feel of the downtown, while creating opportunities for revitalization and reinvestment in the City core for the future. The plan’s Parking Strategy contains parking and land use elements which ultimately guided this study’s goals, objectives, and final recommendations. Project Process Below is a flowchart (Figure 2.10) of the Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study and Recommendations. This flowchart details the key milestones of this effort from project inception to this technical report. Figure 1.1 – Project Timeline 173 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 9 174 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 10 2. Existing Conditions & Parking Inventory The City of Hermosa Beach has substantial commercial, retail, restaurant, and other non-residential uses that create a unique mix of parking demand due to the distinct character of the community and walkability of the downtown core. Study Area Characteristics The Coastal Zone of Hermosa Beach represents approximately 43% of the City’s land area and includes two miles of sandy shoreline, the City’s downtown core of commercial activity, the civic center area, neighborhood commercial establishments, and a mix of residential land uses including single-family homes, small multi-unit complexes, mobile homes, and larger multi- family apartment complexes. Most of the area land uses and properties were initially developed from 1900 through the 1960s and there is limited undeveloped land area with the exception of the City’s network of parks and open spaces. The majority of public parking within the Coastal Zone in Hermosa Beach is provided through on-street parking within or adjacent to residential uses, with additional on and off-street metered parking provided in the commercial core, and a number of remote parking areas available at no cost at City facilities, parks, and recreational facilities. Parking Data Sources The initial Beach Access and Parking Study1 prepare in 2015 divided the Coastal Zone into three subzones of analysis: northern residential use, central commercial use, and southern residential use. In order to provide a more detailed evaluation of parking needs within the Coastal Zone, those subzones were redefined as part of this parking study into eight zones to generally reflect the relationship between the existing parking network and the PLAN Hermosa character areas. Rather than following the exact boundaries of the PLAN Hermosa character areas, divisions between zones was often dependent on whether the zone provided metered or non- metered parking. Dividing the zones in this manner provides the opportunity to develop recommendations that are more specifically tailored based on the types of parking present in each zone. Figure 2.1 illustrates the resultant zones used in this study. For reference, a map of the delineated zones overlaid on the City’s Coastal Zone character areas can be found in Appendix A. 1 Image Source: Beach Access Parking Study, Fehr & Peers (2015) 175 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 11 Figure 2.1 – Study Area Map 176 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 12 All data as part of this study was obtained from previous parking study efforts and other sources directly from the City. Parking occupancy within each zone was based on existing data provided by the City from two sources. Public parking data was obtained from the Beach Access and Parking Study. Parking supply and occupancy data was collected from the City for all public on-street and public off-street parking in the Coastal Zone. Public on- street parking counts were conducted for the entirety of the Coastal Zone. Public off-street parking counts were collected in Hermosa Beach Public Lot A, Lot B, and Lot C. All three public lots are located in Zone 5: Walk Street – Downtown west of Hermosa Avenue from 11th Street to 14th Street. Lots A and B provide surface parking; Lot C is a three story-parking structure. Public parking occupancy counts were collected during three time periods in August of 2014: a Tuesday afternoon (2:00 pm – 3:00 pm), a Tuesday evening (7:00 pm – 8:00 pm), and a Saturday afternoon (2:00 pm – 3:00 pm). Afternoon observation times were intended to capture the peak beach visitation period, and the evening time were intended to capture the peak weekday evening restaurant dinner hour. While this data was initially collected in 2014, we believe that the overall inventory and occupancy conditions remain relevant today. Private off-street parking data for the Coastal Zone was collected separately in 2017, as part of a City-led inventory and occupancy count. While every private lot was inventoried, observed data included only select properties with 15 or more parking spaces given their potential for shared use opportunities. Parking occupancy counts were collected during six time periods: a weekday morning, weekday afternoon, weekday evening, weekday night, weekend afternoon, and weekend evening. For consistency, only the three time periods that aligned with the public occupancy counts were chosen for analysis. Therefore, the data utilized for the purposes of this study included the occupancy observed during the weekday afternoon, weekday evening, and weekend afternoon. No assumptions were made for properties that were not observed for occupancy. Zone Development and Characteristics Data on parking inventory, occupancy, and anticipated demand is aggregated at the zonal level, meaning everything within a zone is treated equally. For example, if occupancy within the northern area of a given zone is higher than occupancy in the southern area of the same zone, the analysis would reflect the aggregate of the entire zone. Therefore, any recommendations tied to that particular zone will address overall trends but will not reflect issues on a block-by-block basis. Data for each of the zones was obtained from the City and was grouped and subsequently analyzed as follows: • Off-Street (Public and Private) Parking  Total Inventory and Occupancy • On-Street (Public) Parking  Metered  Yellow Meters  Non-Yellow Meters  Non-Metered  Within the Preferential Parking Zone  Outside of the Preferential Parking Zone 177 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 13 For consistency with the City’s defined character areas, the naming convention for the eight zones are as follows: Zone 1: Walk Street – North End Zone 2: North End East Zone 3: Walk Street – Sand Section North Zone 4: Sand Section – Valley Zone 5: Walk Street – Downtown Zone 6: Sand Section – Civic Center Zone 7: Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo Zone 8: Sand Section – Cypress Figures 2.2 through 2.9 illustrate each zone in greater detail. Following the figures outlining the boundaries of each zone, Table 2.1 provides a full description of the eight zones based upon the City’s character areas, types of parking spaces available, and status as either public or private. 178 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 14 Figure 2.2 – Zone 1 Boundary Map 179 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 15 Figure 2.3 – Zone 2 Boundary Map 180 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 16 Figure 2.4 – Zone 3 Boundary Map 181 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 17 Figure 2.5 – Zone 4 Boundary Map Figure 2.6 – Zone 5 Boundary Map 182 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 18 183 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 19 Figure 2.7 – Zone 6 Boundary Map 184 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 20 Figure 2.8 – Zone 7 Boundary Map 185 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 21 Figure 2.9 – Zone 8 Boundary Map 186 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 22 Table 2.1 – Zone Descriptions and Parking Types 187 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 23 Inventory of Parking Parking inventory for the Coastal Zone is summarized in Table 2.2 (by zone) and Table 2.3 (overall) On-street public parking in the Coastal Zone (all eight zones) consists of a total of 3,837 spaces, while the total off-street parking analyzed for this study includes 869 spaces, 521 of which are City-owned public spaces, and the remaining 348 being privately-owned. Parking within privately-owned lots was included only if the lot included 15 parking spaces or more. Zones 5, 6, and 8 were the only zones with private off-street parking that met that threshold. Table 2.2 – Coastal Zone Parking Space Inventory by Zone Zone Total Inventoried Spaces On-Street Off-Street Total Public Private Zone 1 Walk Street – North End 281 0 0 281 Zone 2 North End East 518 0 0 518 Zone 3 Walk Street – Sand Section North 493 0 0 493 Zone 4 Sand Section – Valley 738 0 0 738 Zone 5 Walk Street – Downtown 513 521 119 1,153 Zone 6 Sand Section – Civic Center 533 0 135 668 Zone 7 Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo 543 0 0 543 Zone 8 Sand Section - Cypress 218 0 94 312 Total 3,837 521 348 4,706 Table 2.3 – Coastal Zone Parking Space Inventory Parking Type Total Inventoried Spaces On-Street Preferential Yellow Metered 1,155 Preferential Silver Metered 327 Preferential Non-Metered 1,662 Non-Preferential Yellow Metered 20 Non-Preferential Non-Metered 673 Total 3,837 Public Off-Street (City-Owned) Lot A 130 Lot B 37 Lot C 354 Total 521 Private Off-Street Total 348 Overall Total 4,706 188 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 24 Existing Parking Management Programs Management of the City’s parking resources has long been a policy priority in Hermosa Beach given the built-out nature of the community and the popularity of the city as a destination for visitors, beachgoers, and nearby residents. Over the years, a number of different parking management programs have been implemented to manage the limited parking resources of Hermosa Beach. These programs are described briefly below. Parking Fees Within the Coastal Zone, Hermosa Beach maintains a supply of on-street metered or lot/structure pay-by-space parking in the two blocks nearest to the beach throughout the coastal zone. The hourly meter/lot rates cost $1.25 per hour, with meters/lot rates in the commercial core increasing to $1.50 per hour from 8 PM to 2 AM daily. Yellow post meters maintain a rate of $1.25 per hour throughout the day. Residential Parking Permit Program In 1984, the City of Hermosa Beach applied for and was granted permission by the California Coastal Commission to establish a preferential parking permit program in conjunction with remote beach parking locations and a park and ride shuttle system. The preferential parking permit program was developed to discourage oversaturation of the City’s downtown and coastal parking, to provide free long-term parking at inland locations, and to allow residents within the impacted area to park beyond the one-hour time restrictions or without having to pay the meter at yellow pole/cap meters. The impacted area is bound by the North and South City boundaries; by the Strand on the West; by Loma Drive, Park Avenue, or Morningside Drive on the East. Parking spaces on the West side of Cypress Avenue between 11th Street and Pier Avenue are also included. Residential parking permits are issued on an annual basis and cost $40 annually. Vehicle permits are available at a rate of one non-transferrable sticker per vehicle registered to an address (no limit on number of vehicles), and one transferrable hang tag guest pass per legal address. As part of the program, a property owner not residing at the address may also obtain one pass per address and residents within the impacted area may purchase one-day event permits at a rate of $1 for event permits one through five and no charge for permits six through twenty. Daily Parking Permit Program As part of the residential parking permit program, the City is required to make daily parking permit passes available to non-residents or those that live outside of the impacted area that allow them to park at yellow pole/cap meters or beyond the one-hour time restrictions at non- metered locations. Per the City’s Coastal Development Permit for the Residential Parking Permit Program, the maximum daily fee for this permit is $5 and is valid from 8 am to 5 pm. Employee Parking Permit Program For those who work in Hermosa Beach and do not have parking available through their employer, monthly and annual parking passes are available. These permits are available to anyone and monthly permits are available for off-street parking lots/structures at a cost of: • $62 per month to park anytime up to 72 hrs • $31 per month to park only between 5am to 7pm daily 189 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 25 Employee permits are also available to purchase that allow employees to park at on-street spaces with yellow pole/cap meters and in the unmetered, but one-hour time restricted areas at an annual cost of $143 (pro-rated to $71.50 on September 1st). Off-Street Parking Requirements The current parking requirements for land uses within the Coastal Zone are defined within Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Chapter 17.44 includes off-street parking requirements for residential uses, commercial and business uses, downtown district uses, mixed-uses, and common parking facilities, among other requirements for space sizes, tandem parking, and maintenance of parking areas. Table 2.4 below details parking requirements for land uses from Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Table 2.4 – Hermosa Beach Off-Street Parking Requirements Land Use Parking Requirement Commercial Uses Retail 1 space per 250 square feet of GFA2 Offices, general 1 space per 250 square feet of GFA Offices, medical 1 space per 1,000 square feet of GFA Restaurants 1 space per 100 square feet of GFA Fast Food 1 space per 50 square feet of GFA Assembly 1 space per 50 square feet of GFA Service / Repair 1 space per 1,000 square feet of GFA Light Manufacturing 1 space per 300 square feet of GFA Warehousing / Storage 1 space per 1,000 square feet of GFA Commercial Uses in the Downtown District3 Retail 1 space per 333 square feet of GFA Offices, general 1 space per 333 square feet of GFA Offices, medical 1 space per 333 square feet of GFA In Hermosa Beach, common parking facilities may be provided to wholly or partially satisfy the off-street parking requirements of two or more uses when one or more of such uses will only infrequently generate use of such parking area at times when it will ordinarily be needed by the patrons or employees of the other use(s). Multiple-use parking areas are allowed through a Parking Plan approved by the Planning Commission. Hermosa Beach allows parking in-lieu fees for uses in the Downtown District. Building sites with a building floor area to building site of one to one or less may pay an “in-lieu” fee for all required spaces. Otherwise, building sites shall be required to provide a minimum of 25% percent of the required parking on-site. 2 GFA: Gross Floor Area 190 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 26 Hermosa Beach also allows off-site parking allowable by code up to 300 feet from the use for which the spaces are provided. 191 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 27 3. Parking Occupancy Analysis The parking occupancy analysis paints a detailed picture of how public on-street, public off-street, and private off-street parking is utilized in the Coastal Zone. The following terms are used when discussing parking occupancy. • Occupancy: The number of cars parked in a specific area, lot, or blockface 4 during one period of observation. It is often expressed as the percentage of the total supply of spaces that is occupied by parked cars. • Peak: The time period associated with the highest observed level of occupancy in a specific area or parking facility. • Optimal Capacity: The occupancy level or number of vehicles that can be parked in a facility or area before it becomes difficult for a driver to find a space without having to circle or “cruise” for parking. Optimal capacity is typically set at an 85% occupancy level.5 For on-street parking this equates to roughly one vacant space per blockface. • Space Type: Space type is defined as the main characteristic given to a parking space based upon meter or curb type (i.e. green, silver, yellow etc.) This report presents the findings from this data collection effort in three sections: • Overall occupancy summary • Occupancy by zone • Occupancy by on or off-street parking • Occupancy levels by space type. • Occupancy findings Overall Occupancy Summary The following discussion presents overall occupancy trends for public on- and off- street parking, as well as private off-street parking during these three distinct times of day or week. Note that occupancy data was collected during the summer period in order to represent a typical peak season within the Coastal Zone of Hermosa Beach. A summary of the occupancy rates by zone and on or off-street parking is provided in Table 3.1. 4 A blockface is one side of a street between two consecutive features intersecting that street. 5 An on-street parking occupancy of 85% has been demonstrated by parking experts, most notably by Donald Shoup of UCLA, as the benchmark for the practical or optimal capacity of on-street parking. At 85% occupancy, approximately one available space is expected per block, thus limiting the cruising phenomenon and generally assuring the availability of a space. 192 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 28 Table 3.1– Summary of Overall Occupancy per Zone Zone On-Street Parking Types Off-Street Parking Types Observed On-Street Occupancy Observed Off-Street Occupancy Metered Non- metered: Preferential Zone Non-metered: Non- Preferential Zone Public Private Weekday Afternoon Weekday Evening Weekend Afternoon Weekday Afternoon Weekday Evening Weekend Afternoon Zone 1 ✔ 61% 66% 91% N/A N/A N/A Zone 2 ✔ ✔ 53% 62% 82% N/A N/A N/A Zone 3 ✔ 69% 73% 88% N/A N/A N/A Zone 4 ✔ ✔ 47% 62% 83% N/A N/A N/A Zone 5 ✔ ✔ ✔ 77% 84% 94% Public: 89% Private: 10% Public: 78% Private: 3% Public: 86% Private: 16% Zone 6 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 75% 68% 77% Private: 64% Private: 30% Private: 21% Zone 7 ✔ 63% 79% 97% N/A N/A N/A Zone 8 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 66% 86% 100% Private: 46% Private: 45% Private: 95% Occupancy by Zone This section serves as a summary of the study’s findings by zone. Previous sections have detailed figures based upon parking type, while this section provides findings to better show general trends per zone. Table 3.5 summarizes the previous section and highlights the overall occupancy observed for both on-street and off-street parking along with space types found in each zone. Given the study’s findings for the three data collection times, the weekend afternoon tends to have a higher occupancy rate than weekday afternoon and weekday evening. Zone 5 (Walk Street – Downtown), Zone 7 (Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo), and Zone 8 (Sand Section – Cypress) exceed optimal occupancy during the weekend afternoon time period for both on- street and off-street parking. In general, Zones 1 through 4 have lower occupancy than Zones 5 through 8 for all observed times. This can potentially be explained due to the higher rate of beachgoers in the summer months who prefer to park closer to the beach. 193 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 29 Zone 1: Walk Street – North End Zone 1 represents the northwest parking zone in Hermosa Beach. This zone consists of high- density residential east of Hermosa Avenue, and low-density residential on the Strand. There are a few commercial/retail uses on Manhattan near Longfellow Avenue such as Boccato’s Groceries. This zone is characterized primarily by yellow-metered parking at over 87% occupancy. The remaining parking inventory in this zone is either unmetered or green. Parking in this zone on weekdays in relatively constant, at around 60% occupancy overall, but upticks above 90% occupancy for the weekend afternoon time period. Relatively constant occupancy with an uptick during the weekend afternoon can be explained because the area is primarily residential with beachfront access. Zone 2: North End East Zone 2 represents the northeast corner of the Coastal Zone and the eastern portion of the North End Character Area. The zone consists of mainly medium-density residential, with low- density residential to the south east along Gould Avenue. There are also a few commercial/retail land uses on Manhattan Avenue split by 33rd Place. This area is split roughly in half for parking within and outside of the preferential parking district. Although parking occupancy rose nearly 30% from a weekday afternoon to a weekend afternoon, all three observation times showed occupancy under optimal capacity. Due to the primarily residential nature of this zone and that it is further from the beach, change in parking occupancy between weekday and weekend is not expected. Zone 3: Walk Street – Sand Section North Zone 3 represents the zone just north of downtown adjacent to the beach. This area is primarily zoned medium-density residential with low-density along the Strand and Manhattan Avenue to the north. There are two commercial hubs at Greenwich Village and Palm Drive, as well as the west side of Hermosa Avenue at 22nd Street. This zone contains mainly yellow-metered parking, but also has silver-metered and unmetered parking, as well as green and handicapped spaces. According to the three observation times, there is a steady rise in occupancy from the weekday afternoon, to a weekday evening, then weekend afternoon. Both yellow- and silver-metered parking reach over optimal capacity during the weekend afternoon. Similar to Zone 1, this rise in parking occupancy is likely attributed to its close proximity to the beach. Zone 4: Sand Section – Valley Zone 4 is just east of Zone 3 and south of the North End Character Area. This area is primarily zoned low-density residential with medium-density residential to the north and south. This zone also includes Valley Park and a portion of Hermosa Valley School to the northeast and southeast, respectively. This zone consists primarily of preferential parking, occupied at 81%, and is the zone with the highest number of parking spaces in total. As such, this zone did not reach optimal capacity during any of the three observation times. Furthermore, this was the only zone that produced overall occupancy rates of less than 50% during any of the three times. Due to the primarily 194 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 30 residential nature of this zone and that it is further away from the beach, any changes in occupancy between the time periods are nominal. Zone 5: Walk Street – Downtown Zone 5 represents a large portion of the Downtown Core of Hermosa Beach. Most of the area is zoned recreational west of Hermosa Avenue and community east of Hermosa Avenue. High and medium-density residential uses are located to the north and northeast, as well as to the south and southeast. The Hermosa Beach Pier is located west of this zone. Zone 5 consists of yellow and silver meters, unmetered parking, and a small portion of other parking types such as green, handicapped, and reserved. This zone contains more silver- metered parking (48% of zone) than yellow-metered parking (30% of zone). Yellow-metered parking occupancy was measured above optimal capacity at all observation times. On- street occupancy was above 90% for metered and unmetered spaces during the weekend afternoon. As the commercial center of Hermosa Beach, higher occupancies are expected. This same occupancy trend is prevalent for off-street parking in Zone 5 as well, as the occupancy for the 521 observed spaces was above optimal capacity for two of the three observation times. Observed private parking occupancy was measured to be fairly low at all three times, reaching no greater than 16%. The sample size is relatively small compared to the entirety of private parking in Zone 5. A number of factors could have contributed to the low figure for private parking occupancy, such as no show being playing at the Comedy & Magic Club during the three selected time periods. The club was one of two private parking lots counted for analysis in Zone 5. Zone 6: Sand Section – Civic Center Zone 6 is situated just east of the Downtown Core. It is characterized as mainly high-density residential, with community and public facility uses adjacent to Pier Avenue. The zone also includes uses such as the Marineland Mobile Home Park, and a portion of Hermosa Valley School to the northeast. Similar to Zone 2, on-street optimal capacity was not reached during any of the three observation times in Zone 6. In addition, Zone 6 was the only zone to not exceed 80% capacity. Parking in this zone is largely in the preferential parking district, with just under 100 more spaces than in the non-preferential parking area. The low parking occupancy could be attributable to the area being primarily residential, combined with a higher number of off-street spaces to account for the Civic Center, City Hall, and shops along Pier Avenue. Zone 6 had the most off-street private parking spaces observed. Occupancy for off-street parking in this zone was highest at 64% during the weekday afternoon. The weekday evening and weekend afternoon times did not reach above 30% occupancy. Zone 7: Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo Zone 7 represents the southwest parking zone in Hermosa Beach, and extends across the City’s southern boundary. The zone is primarily high-density residential, with a few commercial parcels along Hermosa Avenue south of 3rd Street. 195 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 31 Parking types in this zone consist primarily of yellow-metered spaces at 80%, with 20 of the total 437 yellow meters outside of the preferential parking district. Zone 7 experienced the second highest occupancy rate of any zone for the weekend afternoon time period at 97%. Yellow- metered and unmetered parking in this zone have noticeably higher occupancy rates than silver-metered parking. The high rate of occupancy can be attributed to lack of sufficient parking spaces for visitors in the residential area combined with visitors from the adjacent Redondo Beach. Zone 8: Sand Section – Cypress Zone 8 is located east of Zone 7 and north of 2nd Street. Zone 8 consists primarily of light manufacturing uses within the northeast portion of the zone, and a combination of high- density and medium-density residential spread throughout. Zone 8 provides the lowest number of parking spaces and the highest occupancy rate at 100%. In addition, Zone 8 is the only zone that reaches above optimal capacity during the weekday evening. High occupancy is likely due to a greater number of 24-hour spaces in combination with demand generated from South Park. Private parking in this zone is generally higher than private parking observed in other zones. Zone 8 measured 95% occupancy during the weekend afternoon for private parking, which is the only private parking rate observed to be above optimal capacity during any of the three observation times for this zone. Occupancy by On and Off-Street Parking On-Street Parking In general, all odd numbered zones, or zones that border the beach experience higher levels of parking occupancy than zones further away from the beach, which is expected due to a high rate of beachgoers during summer months. In all zones, peak occupancy occurred during the weekend afternoon. In particular, weekend afternoon occupancy rates exceeded optimal capacity in the following zones: • Zone 1: Walk Street – North End (average occupancy of 91%); • Zone 3: Walk Street – Sand Section North (average occupancy of 88%); • Zone 5: Walk Street – Downtown (average occupancy of 94%); • Zone 7: Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo (average occupancy of 97%), and • Zone 8: Sand Section – Cypress (average occupancy of 100%). Weekday evening occupancy only exceeded optimal capacity in Zone 8 (Sand Section – Cypress, occupancy of 86%). All zones, except Zone 6 (Sand Section – Civic Center), experienced the lowest levels of occupancy during the weekday afternoon (average occupancy of 62%). The highest peak, measured in Zone 8 (Sand Section – Cypress), reached nearly 100% occupancy during the weekend afternoon. While not every spot was occupied in this zone, some segments registered higher occupancy than the available supply due to parking in non- designated parking spaces. For instance, some on-street segments that restricted parking entirely still registered one parked car (i.e. east side of Manhattan Avenue from 6th Street to 8th Street.) Zone 1 (Walk Street – North End), Zone 3 (Walk Street – Sand Section North), Zone 5 196 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 32 (Walk Street – Downtown), and Zone 7 (Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo) saw peaks in occupancy above 90% during the weekend afternoon. Zone 5 (Walk Street – Downtown) and Zone 8 (Sand Section – Cypress) saw peaks in occupancy above 80% for weekday evening. Zone 5 (Walk Street – Downtown) and Zone 6 (Sand Section – Civic Center) saw peaks in occupancy above 70% for weekday afternoon. Figure 3.1 – On-Street Parking Occupancy by Zone Off-Street Parking (Public and Private) Specific parking lots and structures in Zone 5 (Walk Street – Downtown), Zone 6 (Sand Section – Civic Center), and Zone 8 (Sand Section – Cypress) were observed for off-street parking occupancy. Zone 5 (Walk Street – Downtown) is the only zone where public, city-owned off- street parking is provided, consisting of Lots A, B, and C. For these three public lots, average occupancy among the three observation times are fairly consistent ranging, between 78% and 89%. The lowest occupancy observed was 78% during the weekday evening, suggesting that the public lots have availability while being generally well-utilized. Private off-street parking in Zone 5 (Walk Street – Downtown) registered relatively low (less than 16% at peak) occupancy for the two sites counted. One site, at 1301 Manhattan Avenue, serves an office/commercial use that is relatively new and the other is the Comedy & Magic Club which serves as an assembly use. Both uses show high parking availability compared to surrounding uses in the Downtown Core, which may have contributed to the low parking occupancy observed in a typically dense zone. Zone 6 (Sand Section – Civic Center) exhibited a peak of 64% occupied of off-street private parking during the weekday afternoon, where Zone 8 (Sand Section – Cypress) showed a peak of 95% occupied during the weekend afternoon. The total observed off-street parking, regardless of zone, registered a peak of 78% occupancy. Figure 3.2 – Off-Street Parking by Zone 197 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 33 Occupancy by Space Type Table 3.3 presents the on-street occupancy rates by parking and post type for the following zones: • Zone 1: Walk Street – North End; • Zone 3: Walk Street – Sand Section North; • Zone 5: Walk Street – Downtown; and • Zone 7: Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo. On-street occupancy rates were classified by the preferential zone designation in the following zones: • Zone 2: North End East; • Zone 4: Sand Section – Valley; • Zone 6: Sand Section – Civic Center; and • Zone 8: Sand Section – Cypress. As shown in the table, the total of on-street parking inventory as well as total occupancy per time period by zone, and an overall occupancy rate of all on-street parking spots is provided. 198 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 34 Table 3.2 – On-Street Occupancy On-Street Parking Type Inventory Occupancy Weekday Afternoon Weekday Evening Weekend Afternoon Zone 1: Walk Street – North End Yellow Meter 246 62% 64% 91%6 Silver Meter 0 0% 0% 0% Green 3 0% 67% 33% Unmetered 32 63% 81% 94% Total 281 61% 66% 91% Zone 2: North End East Preferential Zone 304 49% 59% 82% Non-Preferential Zone 214 58% 67% 81% Total 518 53% 62% 82% Zone 3: Walk Street – Sand Section North Yellow Meter 337 75% 75% 91% Silver Meter 40 68% 55% 95% Unmetered 96 57% 83% 84% Green 6 67% 67% 83% Handicap 8 13% 0% 13% Unidentified 6 0% 0% 0% Total 493 69% 73% 88% Zone 4: Sand Section – Valley Preferential Zone 600 45% 59% 83% Non-Preferential Zone 138 56% 74% 82% Total 738 47% 62% 83% Zone 5: Walk Street – Downtown Yellow Meter 155 88% 95% 98% Silver Meter 247 73% 80% 94% Unmetered 61 82% 90% 97% Green 22 41% 32% 68% Handicap 5 40% 80% 80% Other 23 65% 83% 78% Total 513 77% 84% 94% Zone 6: Sand Section – Civic Center Preferential Zone 306 77% 76% 78% Non-Preferential Zone 227 72% 57% 76% Total 533 75% 68% 77% Zone 7: Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo Yellow Meter (Preferential) 417 69% 81% 98% Silver Meter 40 48% 58% 78% Unmetered 56 48% 95% 102% Green 7 29% 43% 100% Handicap 1 0% 0% 0% Yellow Meter (Non-Pref.) 20 30% 65% 100% Loading (Non-Pref.) 2 0% 0% 0% Total 543 63% 79% 97% 6 All percentages in bold have measured to reach at or above optimal capacity (85%) 199 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 35 On-Street Parking Type Inventory Occupancy Weekday Afternoon Weekday Evening Weekend Afternoon Zone 8: Sand Section – Cypress Preferential Zone 126 60% 96% 102% Non-Preferential Zone 92 73% 73% 96% Total 218 66% 86% 100% Overall Total 3,837 63% 71% 87% On-Street Parking Overall occupancy during the weekend afternoon, regardless of parking type, yielded consistent levels of occupancy greater than the optimal capacity of 85 percent. Yellow- metered parking occupancy reached levels above 90% during the weekend afternoon. Unmetered parking occupancy reached levels at or above 94% during the weekend afternoon in: • Zone 1: Walk Street – North End; • Zone 5: Walk Street – Downtown; and • Zone 7: Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo. Silver-metered parking reached over 85 percent optimal capacity in: • Zone 3: Walk Street – Sand Section North; and • Zone 5: Walk Street – Downtown. Zone 8 (Sand Section – Cypress) is the only zone that does not border the beach to register levels greater than optimal capacity. In total, all on-street parking experienced occupancy levels just above optimal capacity for the weekend afternoon (87%). Off-Street Parking (Public and Private) Parking occupancy reached optimal capacity twice in the three public lots, during the weekday afternoon and the weekend afternoon, at 89% and 86% respectively. Zone 8 (Sand Section – Cypress) experiences a very high occupancy rate during the weekend afternoon for its private off-street parking at 95%. Overall off-street parking, in total, did not reach optimal capacity for any of the three surveyed times. Table 3.3 – Off-Street Occupancy Off-Street Parking Inventory Occupancy Weekday Afternoon Weekday Evening Weekend Afternoon Zone 5 (Public) 521 89% 78% 86% Zone 5 (Private) 119 10% 3% 16% Zone 6 (Private) 135 64% 30% 21% Zone 8 (Private) 94 46% 45% 95% Total 869 78% 59% 76% 200 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 36 Key Takeaways Key takeaways from the parking occupancy analysis conducted in this section are presented below. These takeaways are intended to guide the development of parking management strategy recommendations for the Coastal Zone later in this report. Overall: • The weekend afternoon time period tends to experience a higher occupancy rate than weekday afternoon and weekday evening, at 87% occupancy in total. • Zones in the southern part of the study area generally experience higher occupancy that zones in the northern part of the study area. • Zones that border the beach experienced the highest levels of occupancy, along with the southern Sand Section – Cypress area. This likely correlates with the higher rate of beachgoers expected on weekends, especially during the summer months. • Zones 1, 3, 5, and 7 consist of on-street parking bordering the beach. During the weekend afternoon: o These zones exceeded optimal capacity (90% occupancy). o Yellow-metered parking exceeded optimal capacity in Zones 1, 5, and 7 (above 90%). o Unmetered parking exceeded optimal capacity in Zones 1, 5, and 7 (above 94%). o Silver-metered parking exceeded optimal capacity in Zones 3 and 5 (above 85%). • Zone 8 is the only zone that does not border the beach that exceeded optimal capacity. During the weekend afternoon, this zone: o Experienced the highest occupancy out of all of the study zones (100%). o Reached optimal capacity for its private parking supply (95%). Weekday time periods experienced significantly less occupancy. o Reached above 100% occupancy in on-street parking due to parking in non-designated spaces. On Street Parking: • Total on-street parking occupancy is above optimal capacity during the weekend afternoon (87%). • Weekday afternoon on-street occupancy remains below optimal capacity in all zones. • All zones experience their lowest on-street occupancy during the weekday afternoon, except the Civic Center area. • Weekday evening on-street occupancy only exceeded optimal capacity in the southern Sand Section – Cypress area. Off-Street Parking: • Public parking lots in the Downtown Core generally remain available while being well-utilized (occupancy ranges from 78-89%). They reach optimal capacity during the weekday and weekend afternoons. • Private parking occupancy in the Downtown Core is relatively low, likely due to high utilization of public parking in this zone during observation times. 201 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 37 4. Parking Demand Analysis Combined with the analysis of existing conditions, analyzing anticipated parking demand in the study area is essential to determine the appropriate parking management strategies for the Coastal Zone. Anticipated parking demand is typically calculated based on industry standards. However, due to the study area’s unique coastal character, it was necessary to create a more complex methodology tailored to Hermosa Beach, which is detailed in the following section. Parking Demand Analysis To determine the City’s current non-residential off-street parking requirements for the study area, the square footage of each land use type in the study area was aggregated by zone. Building square footages were used to calculate the minimum number of off-street parking spaces required by code for each zone. The calculated minimum parking requirement was then compared to the existing number of off-street parking spaces currently available for each type of non-residential use. In order to provide additional data points for determining anticipated parking demand for non-residential land uses (as municipal code requirements are often outdated and may not reflect actual conditions), an anticipated demand of private off-street parking was calculated using the following three sources: 1. Peer City Code – Parking rates from peer city code were averaged among eight (8) comparable cities. Each peer city is listed below. The location of each city respective to Hermosa Beach is found in the image below. 1. Santa Monica 2. Manhattan Beach 3. Redondo Beach 4. Long Beach 5. Huntington Beach 6. Newport Beach 7. Laguna Beach 8. Carlsbad The eight peer cities chosen were based on four main characteristics: • Proximity to Hermosa Beach • Similar distinction as a beach city • Similar land use distribution • Parking requirement code describing a parking overlay district (i.e. downtown district) that reduces their parking regulations as a deviation from the remainder of the city due to higher density, mix of uses, and mode split. 202 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 38 2. Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation: 4th Edition (ITE) - ITE rates are more reflective of suburban uses that are not prevalent throughout the study area, therefore parking demand rates by land use were adjusted to reflect the coastal character of Hermosa Beach. Rates were reduced in the Downtown District by 35% to account for a higher mix of uses and greater modal split (i.e. walkability/ bike-ability/ transit). 3. Urban Land Institute Shared Parking Manual: 2nd Edition (ULI) - ULI rates are more reflective of suburban uses that are not prevalent throughout the study area, therefore shared parking rates by land use were adjusted similar to ITE rates to account for synergy amongst land uses and the overall walkability of Hermosa Beach. Parking ratios from each source (peer city code average, ITE and ULI) were then averaged and calculated against built square footages of non-residential land uses to determine spaces anticipated to be utilized based on demand. This analysis is then compared to the number of parking spaces currently provided. Built and utilized parking ratios are important as they provide insight on whether an area is under- or over-parked, and the parking strategies need to be adjusted to meet anticipated demand. Section 5 of the report provides detailed calculations for the aforementioned parking ratios. Code Requirements for Existing Non-Residential Uses The City provided land use classifications for the majority of the non-residential parcels in the study area. The aggregate square footage of each land use type in the study area was calculated by zone and further analyzed against the City’s existing zoning code. Since each land use type requires a different amount of parking, parking rates vary from use to use. Land Use data was organized by the following non-residential land uses, which are consistent with the designations provided by the City: • Commercial / Retail • Office / Professional • Restaurant • Assembly • Fast Food • Service / Repair • Medical Office • Light Manufacturing • Warehouse / Storage In addition to these uses, the City of Hermosa Beach implements an overlay district for the Downtown Core which reduces the parking requirement for some of the same uses stated above. The Downtown Core uses are: • Commercial/ Retail (Downtown District) • Office/ Professional (Downtown District) • Medical Office (Downtown District) • Restaurant (Downtown District) 7 7 Although the City of Hermosa Beach does not provide a reduction in parking rate for restaurants within the Downtown District, the distinction is made for consistency with Section 5 Parking Demand Analysis, in which the restaurant parking demand is reduced. Justification for restaurant parking demand reduction is also found in Section 5. 203 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 39 Table 4.1 below shows the resulting total number of parking spaces required for each land use type based on the total square footage as well as corresponding parking requirement ratios currently specified in Chapter 17.44.030 and Chapter 17.44.40 of the City of Hermosa Beach Zoning Code. Total existing private off-street parking inventory is also shown for comparison to the number of parking spaces required by the municipal code. Table 4.1 – Non-Residential Parking Spaces Required by City Code Land Use Square Feet by Use Type Existing Minimum Parking Requirements Spaces Required by Code Existing Private Off-Street Parking Spaces Zone 1: Walk Street – North End Commercial / Retail 6,659 1 space per 250 sf 27 4 Total 6,659 27 4 Zone 2: North End East Office / Professional 3,168 1 space per 250 sf 13 6 Commercial / Retail 4,905 1 space per 250 sf 19 4 Total 8,073 32 10 Zone 3: Walk Street – Sand Section North Office / Professional 2,842 1 space per 250 sf 12 12 Commercial / Retail 12,002 1 space per 250 sf 48 4 Restaurant 5,114 1 space per 100 sf 51 2 Total 19,958 111 18 Zone 4: Sand Section – Valley N/A8 N/A N/A N/A N/A Zone 5: Walk Street – Downtown Office / Professional (Downtown District) 28,640 1 space per 333 sf 86 1049 Commercial / Retail (Downtown District) 67,915 1 space per 333 sf 203 5010 Restaurant (Downtown District) 39,871 1 space per 100 sf 399 1111 Assembly 9,483 1 space per 50 sf 190 42 Fast Food 2,800 1 space per 50 sf 56 4 Service / Repair 2,900 1 space per 1,000 sf 3 0 Total 151,609 937 211 Zone 6: Sand Section – Civic Center 8 There is no off-street private parking in Zone 4: Sand Section – Valley 9 1301 Manhattan Ave: Parking Plan 14-8, CUP 16-5 10 1301 Manhattan Ave: Parking Plan 14-8, CUP 16-5 11 1301 Manhattan Ave: Parking Plan 14-8, CUP 16-5 204 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 40 Land Use Square Feet by Use Type Existing Minimum Parking Requirements Spaces Required by Code Existing Private Off-Street Parking Spaces Office / Professional (Downtown District) 20,684 1 space per 333 sf 62 6612, 13, 14 Commercial / Retail (Downtown District) 72,438 1 space per 333 sf 217 17915 Restaurant (Downtown District) 1,600 1 space per 100 sf 16 0 Medical Office (Downtown District) 2,000 1 space per 333 sf 6 416 Light Manufacturing 13,676 1 space per 300 sf 46 22 Total 110,398 347 271 Zone 7: Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo Commercial /Retail 15,979 1 space per 250 sf 64 3917 Restaurant 4,542 1 space per 100 sf 45 15 Total 20,521 109 54 Zone 8: Sand Section – Cypress Office / Professional 8,933 1 space per 250 sf 36 13 Light Manufacturing 87,900 1 space per 300 sf 292 169 Warehousing / Storage 14,519 1 space per 1,000 sf 15 1 Service / Repair 9,057 1 space per 1,000 sf 9 13 Total 120,409 352 196 Overall Total 437,627 1,915 764 The table shows that Zones 3 (Walk Street – Sand Section North) and Zone 5 (Walk Street – Downtown), in particular, have less existing parking spaces than required by code. In the City of Hermosa Beach, multiple Common/Shared Parking Plans, Conditional Use Permits (CUP’s), in-lieu fees, and resolutions are in place that allow for a deviation of parking spaces from the City’s existing code. As these deviations are specific to individual sites, this analysis reflects aggregate parking requirements on a zone level. The deviations within each zone level in Table 4.1 are provided as footnotes to explain any potential discrepancies between City parking requirements and associated existing spaces. Although there were 348 private off-street parking spaces observed for occupancy in the Coastal Zone as noted previously in table 3.1, there are actually a total of 764 private off-street 12 205 Pier Ave: Parking Plan 08- 1 and 10-2, Planning Commission Resolution 08-29 13 Note for 425 Pier Ave: Parking Plan to allow the expanded business to use 8 off-site shared parking spaces at 555 Pier Ave (PARK 12-8, CUP 12-5) 14 Parking Plan 98-2 shared use of existing parking for off-site business CON 04-15 15 205 Pier Ave: Parking Plan 08- 1 and 10-2, Planning Commission Resolution 08-29 16 555 Pier Ave: Planning Commission Resolution 93-60 for a Parking Plan to allow less than required for a medical office 17 Parking Plan 03-6, Conditional Use Permit 04-8, Precise Development Plan 04-9 205 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 41 parking spaces. Since the analysis using municipal code is not limited to only observed parking demand, all 764 private off-street spaces in the Coastal Zone were included in the calculations for non-residential uses. Figure 4.1 illustrates the locations of the non-residential uses that were observed. The total number of spaces required for non-residential uses in the Coastal Zone based on the City’s code is approximately 1,915 spaces compared to the 764 spaces that currently exist for the same uses. 206 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 42 Figure 4.1 – Map of Observed Non-Residential Land Uses 207 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 43 Actual Built Parking Ratios Comparing land use ratios to existing parking spaces may not provide the whole picture in determining whether the number of existing spaces is sufficient and adequate for the City’s needs. It is important to analyze the total square footage of a land use to the total parking spaces provided to create an actual built18 ratio for each zone and for the Coastal Zone as a whole. The following analysis shows actual built ratios of private off-street parking supply (Table 4.2). The actual built ratio per space was determined by dividing the actual total built square footage by the actual parking supply in each zone. For comparative purposes, Table 4.2 also includes the actual built ratio of parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of non-residential land uses. This was determined by dividing the parking supply by the actual built square footage per 1,000. The resulting total figure of 1.75 shows that for every 1,000 square feet of non-residential land use in the Coastal Zone, there are 1.75 existing off-street parking spaces. 1.75 spaces per 1,000 square feet for this specific mix can be compared to the Adjusted Peak Demand Ratio per 1,000 square feet found in Table 5.5. Table 4.2 – Actual Built Parking Ratios for Non-Residential Land Uses Zone Actual Built Square Footage (sf) Actual Parking Supply Actual Built Ratio per Space (sf) Actual Built Ratio per 1,000 sf (spaces) Zone 1: Walk Street – North End 6,659 4 1,665 0.60 Zone 2: North End East 8,073 10 807 1.24 Zone 3: Walk Street – Sand Section North 19,958 18 1,109 0.90 Zone 4: Sand Section – Valley N/A N/A N/A N/A Zone 5: Walk Street – Downtown 151,609 211 719 1.39 Zone 6: Sand Section – Civic Center 110,398 271 407 2.45 Zone 7: Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo 20,521 54 380 2.63 Zone 8: Sand Section – Cypress 120,409 196 614 1.63 Total 437,627 764 573 1.75 18 “Actual built” implies that there is no distinction between occupied sf or vacant sf, and includes all building sf. Example: Zone 1 Walk Street – North End 6,659 sf (actual built square footage) / 4 spaces (actual parking supply) = 1,665 sf (actual built ratio per space) 1,000 sf (typical sf figure to determine parking ratios) / 1,665 sf (actual built ratio per space) = 0.60 spaces (actual built ratio per 1,000 sf) 208 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 44 Anticipated Peak Parking Demand The anticipated peak parking demand for each non-residential land use type was determined based on a rate that combines peer city rates (including reduced-parking demand districts), adjusted ITE rates, and adjusted ULI rates. These three rates were averaged together (where data was applicable) to create an anticipated peak parking demand rate for each use (Table 5.1). Table 5.1 also presents Hermosa Beach’s current required parking rates as well as observed demand based on the City’s Beach Access Study. Each comparative demand rate is discussed in detail below. Average City Required Rate The peer cities chosen were based on four main characteristics: their proximity to Hermosa Beach, their similar distinction as a beach city, their similar land use distribution, and parking requirement code describing a parking overlay district (i.e. downtown district) that reduces their parking regulations as a deviation from the remainder of the City due to higher density, mix of uses, and mode split. The eight cities that were studied are: • Long Beach • Santa Monica • Newport Beach • Laguna Beach • Manhattan Beach • Huntington Beach • Carlsbad • Redondo Beach Using the parking requirements found in each of the eight peer cities, an “Average City Required Rate” was created for comparison to the land use types studied in Hermosa Beach and is presented in Table 5.1. For walkable, high-density areas with a mix of uses where ridesharing is commonly used, most cities create a specialized overlay district where parking requirements are reduced. The Average City Required Rate was created by averaging all eight city codes based on land use. For land uses within an overlay district, the Average City Required Rate in the table reflects the reduced requirements found in the cities’ overlay districts. Uses found in the overlay district include commercial/retail, office/professional, medical office, and restaurant uses. A table of all city rates for each land use type can be found in Appendix B. 209 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 45 ITE Rate The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual: 4th Edition is used as the industry standard for parking demand rates. Since these rates are based mostly on suburban land uses and may not be accurate for the beach city character of Hermosa Beach, uses in the overlay district were reduced by 35% to account for a higher density of uses, a mix of uses, and a greater variation in mode split. Numerous case studies were considered when developing a specific and appropriate reduction rate. Data was taken from the Victoria Transport Policy Institute Parking Management Strategies, the ‘Reduced Parking for Mixed-Use Areas’ provision of the City of Portland, Oregon Off-street Parking Management and Guiding Policies, and the Petco Park Area Transportation Study found in the Escondido Ballpark Project Traffic Impact Analysis by Linscott, Law & Greenspan in 2010. These case studies, coupled with other industry standards and previous parking studies similar to the Hermosa Beach’s Downtown Core, show that a 25% reduction from the standard ITE rate is necessary to account for mode split, citing a higher rate of ride hailing services and alternative modes. An additional 10% reduction in parking is also appropriate to account for a walkable area with a high mix of uses where “park once” is a common approach by downtown users. More detail on these case studies can be found in Appendix C. ULI Rate The Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parking Manual: 2nd Edition has established the industry standard for shared parking demand among mixed uses. ULI differs from ITE as ULI considers the synergy and efficiency amongst compatible land uses by time of day, time of week, or time of year. ULI rates presented in Table 5.1 were also reduced by 35% for the Hermosa Beach Downtown District based on the same findings mentioned above. 210 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 46 Table 4.3 – Anticipated Peak Parking Demand Rates for Non-Residential Land Uses Land Use Comparative Demand Rates19 Anticipated Peak Parking Demand Rate Hermosa Beach Rates20 Average City Required Rate ITE Demand Rate ULI Shared Parking Demand Rate Hermosa Beach Required Rate Hermosa Beach Observed Demand Commercial / Retail 250 sf 214.1 sf 277.8 sf 247 sf 250 sf 609.7 sf Commercial / Retail (Overlay District) 329.2 sf 329.4 sf 427.4 sf 362 sf 333 sf 642.4 sf Office / Professional 287.5 sf 352.1 sf 263.2 sf 301 sf 250 sf N/A Office / Professional (Overlay District) 307.8 sf 541.7 sf 404.9 sf 439 sf 333 sf 413.3 sf Medical Office (Overlay District) 181.3 sf 480.8 sf 341.8 sf 335 sf 333 sf 500 sf Restaurant 119.3 sf 181.8 sf 95.2 sf 132 sf 100 sf N/A Restaurant (Overlay District) 135 sf 279.7 sf 146.4 sf 187 sf 100 sf 201.4 sf Fast Food 159.4 sf 121.9 sf 66.7 sf 116 sf 50 sf N/A Service / Repair 362.5 sf 444.4 sf No rate 404 sf 1,000 sf N/A Assembly 3.8 seats 2.6 seats 2.5 seats 3 seats 50 sf 378.3 sf Light Manufacturing 537.5 sf 980.4 sf No rate 759 sf 300 sf 785.8 sf Warehousing / Storage 1,187.5 sf 1,960.8 sf No rate 1,574 sf 1,000 sf 1,051.8 sf After developing an Anticipated Peak Parking Demand Rate for each use, the number of parking spaces anticipated to be occupied in each zone at peak was calculated using the actual built square footage of non-residential land uses21 and their associated Anticipated Peak Parking Demand Rates, presented in Table 5.2. Existing off-street parking inventory is also shown for comparison to the anticipated peak demand. The total number of parking spaces forecast for non-residential uses in the Coastal Zone is 1,283 spaces compared to the 764 spaces that exist for the same uses, suggesting that the anticipated parking demand for the Coastal Area exceeds the actual off-street parking supply.22 19 The comparative rates (purple) were summed and averaged to establish the Anticipated Peaking Parking Demand Rate. All rates represent square footage per one parking space. 20 These Hermosa Beach rates (blue) are presented for comparative purposes only. All rates represent square footage per one parking space. 21 This calculation assumes 100% of actual building square footage is occupied and generating parking demand, as building vacancy rates were not collected for this study. 22 Although some zones show a higher anticipated demand than supply available, it is important to note that there may be additional supply not included in this analysis. Private lots were only observed if they consisted of 15 or more spaces. Additionally, Zone 5: Walk Street –Downtown contains public, city-owned, off-street lots that are not included in this private off-street inventory and may account for any inconsistencies between the number of existing spaces and the number anticipated to be occupied. 211 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 47 Table 4.4 – Non-Residential Parking Demand by Number of Parking Spaces Land Use Square Feet by Use Type Anticipated Peak Parking Demand Rate Anticipated Number of Occupied Parking Spaces Existing Private Off-Street Parking Spaces Zone 1: Walk Street – North End Commercial / Retail 6,659 1 space per 247 sf 27 4 Total 6,659 27 4 Zone 2: North End East Office / Professional 3,168 1 space per 301 sf 11 6 Commercial / Retail 4,905 1 space per 247 sf 20 4 Total 8,073 31 10 Zone 3: Walk Street – Sand Section North Office / Professional 2,842 1 space per 301 sf 9 12 Commercial / Retail 12,002 1 space per 247 sf 49 4 Restaurant 5,114 1 space per 132 sf 39 2 Total 19,958 97 18 Zone 4: Sand Section – Valley N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Zone 5: Walk Street – Downtown Office / Professional (Downtown District) 28,640 1 space per 439 sf 65 104 Commercial / Retail (Downtown District) 67,915 1 space per 362 sf 188 50 Restaurant (Downtown District) 39,871 1 space per 187 sf 213 11 Assembly 9,483 1 space per 3 seats 75 42 Fast Food 2,800 1 space per 116 sf 24 4 Service / Repair 2,900 1 space per 404 sf 7 0 Total 151,609 572 211 Zone 6: Sand Section – Civic Center Office / Professional (Downtown District) 20,684 1 space per 439 sf 47 66 Commercial / Retail (Downtown District) 72,438 1 space per 362 sf 200 179 Restaurant (Downtown District) 1,600 1 space per 187 sf 9 0 Medical Office (Downtown District) 2,000 1 space per 335 sf 6 4 Light Manufacturing 13,676 1 space per 759 sf 18 22 Total 110,398 280 271 Zone 7: Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo Commercial / Retail 15,979 1 space per 247 sf 65 39 Restaurant 4,542 1 space per 132 sf 34 15 Total 20,521 99 54 Zone 8: Sand Section – Cypress 212 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 48 Land Use Square Feet by Use Type Anticipated Peak Parking Demand Rate Anticipated Number of Occupied Parking Spaces Existing Private Off-Street Parking Spaces Office / Professional 8,933 1 space per 301 sf 30 13 Light Manufacturing 87,900 1 space per 759 sf 116 169 Warehousing / Storage 14,519 1 space per 1,574 sf 9 1 Service / Repair 9,057 1 space per 404 sf 22 13 Total 120,409 177 196 Overall Total 437,627 1,283 764 To further compare anticipated demand for each zone, an analysis of anticipated parking demand ratios is shown in Table 5.3. The ratio of built square footage per parking space was calculated by dividing the actual built square footage of non-residential land uses in the study area by the corresponding number of parking spaces anticipated to be occupied during peak demand, as calculated in the previous table. For comparative purposes, the demand ratio of parking spaces per 1,000 square feet was determined by dividing the anticipated demand rate by the actual built square footage per 1,000 square feet. The resulting total figure of 2.93 shows that for every 1,000 square feet of non-residential uses in the Coastal Zone, there is an anticipated demand of 2.93 parking spaces during peak times. Below is a sample calculation for Zone 1: Walk Street – North End. Example: Zone 1 Walk Street – North End 6,659 sf (actual built square footage) / 27 spaces (anticipated number of occupied spaces) = 247 sf (adjusted peak demand ratio per space) 1,000 sf (typical sf figure to determine parking ratios) / 247 sf (adjusted peak demand ratio per space) = 4.04 spaces (adjusted peak demand ratio per 1,000 sf) 213 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 49 Table 4.5 – Anticipated Peak Parking Demand Ratios Zone Actual Built Square Footage (sf) Actual Parking Supply Actual Built Ratio per Space (sf) Actual Built Ratio per 1,000 sf (spaces) Zone 1: Walk Street – North End 6,659 27 247 4.04 Zone 2: North End East 8,073 31 266 3.76 Zone 3: Walk Street – Sand Section North 19,958 97 206 4.84 Zone 4: Sand Section – Valley N/A N/A N/A N/A Zone 5: Walk Street – Downtown 151,609 572 265 3.78 Zone 6: Sand Section – Civic Center 110,398 280 395 2.53 Zone 7: Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo 20,521 99 207 4.82 Zone 8: Sand Section – Cypress 120,409 177 680 1.47 Total 437,627 1,283 341 2.93 In Section 4, Table 4.2 shows the actual number of spaces provided per 1,000 square feet, and comparative Table 5.3 above shows the peak number of spaces demanded per 1,000 square feet. Each zone’s anticipated demand exceeds the actual built supply of off-street parking, except for Zone 8 (Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo). In general, the average supply of off-street parking for non-residential land uses is currently 1.75 spaces per 1,000 square feet, while average demand is 2.93 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet at peak. While non-residential land use comparisons to private off-street parking provide insight on their lot utilization, the availability of nearby on-street parking should also be considered. If on-street parking utilization in the vicinity of non-residential land uses is high, then it may be possible that these non-residential land uses are demanding more parking than can be measured through observing respective private lot capacity exclusively, as users are willing to park on-street to access these uses. Although no formal survey was conducted, street segments adjacent to non-residential land uses were evaluated to determine if there was any correlation between land use and adjacent on-street parking utilization. On a zone-by-zone basis, there is no definitive correlation between the two. However, in general, specific on-street parking segments within each zone that are adjacent to non-residential land uses, such as on Hermosa Avenue and Pier Avenue appear to experience higher rates of occupancy than other areas and are either at or above optimal capacity. Anticipated Seasonal Parking Demand Peer city code, ITE, and ULI all provide rates for peak times, however, parking demand for every land use rarely peak simultaneously. The parking demand findings in Section 5.1 reflect parking demand at peak times for all individual uses, regardless of season. To more accurately reflect parking demand in Hermosa Beach, demand rates should also be analyzed according to season, as different land uses may reach peak times at different times of the year. For instance, commercial/ retail uses have the highest parking demand in December, but office uses do not reach their highest parking demand in the same month. Because of this, demand for uses varies from season to season. According to ULI, the month of December typically has the greatest parking demand among all months, and therefore often represents 214 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 50 peak parking demand in this analysis. Seasonal adjustments are based on demand anticipated every three months starting from December, reflecting typical conditions for Spring (March), Summer (June), and Fall (September). To adjust accordingly to seasonal parking demand rates, the ULI Shared Parking Manual: 2nd Edition was used. This nationally accepted shared parking manual provides seasonal demand rates adjusted for customer/visitor parking. Using the ULI Shared Parking Manual has limitations since it averages numerous U.S. cities to determine averaged seasonal peak demands, where unique cities such as Hermosa Beach may not be represented as accurately. Due to the greater influx of summer visitors in Hermosa Beach compared to a typical U.S. city, Hermosa Beach could expect peak demand in summer months fairly close or higher than the calculated demand in December. Table 5.4 provides a summary of seasonal demand parking rates per zone and per land use. The table includes the anticipated number of occupied spaces found in Table 5.2 for comparative purposes, which represents the “Peak” (if all land uses simultaneously reach peak demand). According to the ULI manual, the month of December represents the highest anticipated parking demand for any of the 12 months. For Hermosa Beach, the analysis indicates that 1,246 spaces would be demanded overall in December, which is 37 spaces less than the number of spaces demanded during the simultaneous total peak. The month that saw the lowest parking demand was September, with only 1,050, or 233 less spaces than the number of spaces demanded at the simultaneous total peak. Table 4.6 – Seasonal Parking Demand Land Use Square Feet by Use Type Anticipated Number of Occupied Parking Spaces Existing Private Off- Street Parking Spaces Peak Dec. Mar. Jun. Sep. Zone 1: Walk Street – North End Commercial / Retail 6,659 27 27 17 18 17 4 Total 6,659 27 27 17 18 17 4 Zone 2: North End East Office / Professional 3,168 11 9 11 11 11 6 Commercial / Retail 4,905 20 20 13 13 13 4 Total 8,073 31 29 24 24 24 10 Zone 3: Walk Street – Sand Office / Professional 2,842 9 8 9 9 9 12 Commercial / Retail 12,002 49 49 31 33 31 4 Restaurant 5,114 39 39 37 37 35 2 Total 19,958 97 96 77 79 75 18 Zone 4: Sand Section – Valley N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Zone 5: Walk Street – Downtown Office / Professional (Downtown District) 28,640 65 52 65 65 65 104 Commercial / Retail (Downtown District) 67,915 188 188 118 126 120 50 215 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 51 Land Use Square Feet by Use Type Anticipated Number of Occupied Parking Spaces Existing Private Off- Street Parking Spaces Peak Dec. Mar. Jun. Sep. Restaurant (Downtown District) 39,871 213 213 203 203 194 11 Assembly 9,483 75 71 74 68 69 42 Fast Food 2,800 24 23 23 22 23 4 Service/Repair 2,900 7 7 7 7 7 0 Total 151,609 572 554 490 491 478 211 Zone 6: Sand Section – Civic Center Office/ Professional (Downtown District) 20,684 47 38 47 47 47 66 Commercial/ Retail (Downtown District) 72,438 200 200 126 134 128 179 Restaurant (Downtown District) 1,600 9 9 8 8 8 0 Medical Office (Downtown District) 2,000 6 5 6 6 6 4 Light Manufacturing 13,676 18 18 18 18 18 22 Total 110,398 280 270 205 213 207 271 Zone 7: Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo Commercial/ Retail 15,979 65 65 41 43 41 39 Restaurant 4,542 34 34 33 33 31 15 Total 20,521 99 99 74 76 72 54 Zone 8: Sand Section – Cypress Office/ Professional 8,933 30 24 30 30 30 13 Light Manufacturing 87,900 116 116 116 116 116 169 Warehousing/ Storage 14,519 9 9 9 9 9 1 Service/ Repair 9,057 22 22 22 22 22 13 Total 120,409 177 171 177 177 177 196 Overall Total 437,627 1,283 1,246 1,064 1,078 1,050 764 Anticipated Future Parking Demand The City of Hermosa Beach’s Coastal Zone has a unique character that will slowly transform and progress in the future. As part of the character, the Coastal Zone is fairly built-out, meaning that there is little area for newly built structures in west Hermosa Beach. A large majority of growth in the Coastal Zone will come in two ways: • Additional or modified construction on existing infrastructure • A change to more intensive land uses while maintaining existing infrastructure To plan for future growth in the Coastal Zone, the City should reconsider all new projects, modifications, and land use changes as an alteration to parking demand. The basis for formulating changes in anticipated parking demand should stem from two key documents, PLAN Hermosa and this report. 216 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 52 In PLAN Hermosa, Table 2.1 Land Use Designations 23 outlines density and intensity constraints for each land use designation. The limits set by dwelling units per acre (Du/Ac) and floor area ratio (FAR) would be facilitated to maintain the future character of Hermosa Beach and limit the amount of accompanying parking per use. Dwelling units per acre and floor area ratio for any new growth in the Coastal Zone should be studied against the Anticipated Peak Parking Demand established in Table 5.1 in this report. Using both of these datasets would create meaningful parking requirements that support the planned character of the Coastal Zone while maintaining a level of parking supply that is suitable for efficient automobile access. Key Takeaways Key takeaways from the parking demand analysis conducted in this section are presented below. These takeaways are intended to guide the development of parking management strategy recommendations for the Coastal Zone later in this report. • A total of 764 spaces currently exist for non-residential uses in the Coastal Zone, as observed for this study, while the total number of spaces required for the same non-residential uses based on the City’s code is approximately 1,915 spaces. • The total number of parking spaces forecast for the same non-residential uses is 1,283 spaces, suggesting that the anticipated parking demand for the Coastal Area exceeds the actual off-street parking supply. • The average supply of off-street parking for non-residential land uses is currently 1.75 spaces per 1,000 square feet, while average demand is 2.93 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet at peak. • As a result, on-street parking segments that are adjacent to non-residential land uses generally appear to experience higher rates of occupancy than other areas and are either at or above optimal capacity. Parking management strategies should account for this trend in parking utilization. • Seasonally, the highest peak in parking demand can be anticipated to be in December, as well as the summer months due to the Coastal Zone’s proximity to the beach and various commercial/retail/recreational uses. • PLAN Hermosa Land Use Designations should be used in conjunction with the Anticipated Peak Parking Demand Analysis conducted in this report to determine appropriate parking requirements in response to the anticipated growth in the Coastal Zone. 23 Image Source: Plan Hermosa (2017) 217 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 53 5. Recommendations The City of Hermosa Beach’s unique character makes the Coastal Zone a destination for residents, employees, and visitors alike. Hermosa Beach’s positioning as a small town paired with a destination city creates a host of parking challenges that should be addressed to optimize the City’s parking resources in the short and long-term. The recommendations presented below lay the foundational aspects to resolve current parking limitations found in the parking occupancy and demand analyses with the intent to improve upon the overall parking system. The recommendations follow the use of nationally-recognized best practices, case studies, and peer cities to inform parking management solutions, and are tailored to the unique character of Hermosa Beach. All potential recommendations were evaluated and selected based upon alignment with the stated goals and objectives found in PLAN Hermosa and the Downtown Core Revitalization Plan. The following recommendations are actionable and feasible with the given characteristics of the Coastal Zone. There are twelve (12) specific recommendations categorized by six (6) overall strategies. These recommendations and strategies are organized in Table 6.1 below: Table 5.1 – Recommendations Recommendation Number Recommendation Strategically Invest in Information and Technology 1 Implement an App-Based Mobile Pay System 2 Design and Implement a Demand-Based Parking Management Program 3 Invest and Implement a Comprehensive Parking Signage and Wayfinding System Maximize Use of Existing Parking Supply 4 Pilot a Shared Parking Program and Facilitate Shared Parking 5 Maximize Flexibility of Curb Space to Accommodate Rideshare, Other Modes, and/or Valet Service Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand 6 Reinvest Parking Revenues into Multimodal Improvements Simplify and Leverage the Zoning Code 7 Revise the Zoning Code to Better Support Walkable, Mixed-Use Development in the Coastal Zone Enhance Parking Administration and Operations 8 Enhance Event Management Practices to Maximize Parking System Flexibility and Predictability 9 Improve the Residential Parking Permit Program 10 Improve Employee Parking Permit Program 11 Establish an Ongoing Collection, Monitoring, and Evaluation Process Provide Additional Public Parking as Needed 12 Strategically Invest in New Public and Shared Parking Supply in Key Locations 218 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 54 Several parameters were used to screen the specific recommendations. The matrix in Table 5.2 provides a summary of recommendations with the following key implementation criteria: • Cost o Level of cost is relatively based against all other recommendations (i.e. constructing a parking structure would have a high cost respective to an employee parking permit program). • Level of Difficulty o Level of difficulty is relatively factored against all other recommendations based upon the amount of coordination or space available needed to implement the recommendation. • Priority o Priority level is factored against all other recommendations based upon the greatest impact that is in line with the City of Hermosa Beach’s goals. • Implementation Timeline o Cost, level of difficulty, and priority were all factors weighted to inform the short- , mid-, or long-term implementation goals for each recommendation. • Recommended Zones for Implementation o Recommended zones indicate where the recommendation would be most beneficial for implementation based on the zone’s unique character and observed demand. • Relation to Study Goals o Relation to Study Goals details how a recommendation aligns with the goals for the Coastal Zone stated in the Introduction. The goals are also listed below:  #1: Create a parking system that meets the parking needs and demands of residents, visitors, and employees in an efficient and cost- effective manner.  #2: Modify parking standards to encourage revitalization and investment in a pedestrian-oriented district.  #3: Expand mobility options and optimize parking availability. The recommendations listed below utilize policies and programs that will efficiently use existing parking supply while maintaining land use flexibility within the Coastal Zone. The recommendations emphasize a zonal and performance-based management approach that will better utilize parking assets. Improved parking management will enable Hermosa Beach to continue to grow sustainably, while reducing parking demand and traffic congestion. The recommendations that follow are designed to work together to meet the City’s parking management goals. It is important that to the greatest extent possible the recommendations be implemented as a cohesive “package” of reforms. As the Coastal Zone area continues to grow and evolve, its parking needs will change as well. This report recommends techniques to both address current challenges and allow the City to be nimble in reacting to future parking challenges. Finally, it is important to emphasize that these recommendations are specific to the established parking zones studied and would not necessarily apply to other neighborhoods outside the City of Hermosa Beach Coastal Zone. 219 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 55 Table 5.2 – Recommendations Matrix 220 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 56 Development of Recommendations Each of the recommendations in this report are driven by inventory, occupancy, and demand analyses and are aligned by the goals and objectives from PLAN Hermosa, the Beach Access and Parking Study, and the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy. The recommendations made in this report draw from best practices by peer cities and industry-wide standards as guidance, but were tailored to address the unique features of Hermosa Beach’s infrastructure, character, and geography. Strategically Invest in Information and Technology Information and technology solutions are key aspects in advanced parking demand management. A strategic vision for technology solutions tied to new parking management policies would ensure successful implementation and monitoring of the City’s parking goals. These first two recommendations set a framework for innovating data collection, communicating critical information, and promote change in parking behavior. Recommendation #1 Implement an App-Based Mobile Pay System Cost: Average Level of Difficulty: Average Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals: #2, #3 Why? Most payment systems are antiquated. Finding current parking in in high-demand areas consist of circling, which has secondary effects of congestion and could leave an unpleasant experience for users. After parking, drivers have to leave their car and check the meter before they would know the cost of parking in that space. After a driver pays with coins or card, users with longer visits tend to need to return to their car and “feed the meter” if they wished to stay in Hermosa Beach longer, compelling them to find a new parking space if they’ve hit the hours restriction or cut their visit short altogether. Implementing application-based mobile pay system for parking in Hermosa Beach would allow drivers to find open spaces immediately, know the price of the space in real- time, and be able to pay for the parking space from anywhere. The application-based system would allow the users to have multiple options, regardless of how long or short their stay. How? The City of Hermosa Beach has a strong desire to stay ahead of the technological curve for parking and mobile payment systems. There are numerous payment applications that are able to make parking in Hermosa Beach as convenient and efficient as possible. Mobile phone applications, such as Passport, ParkMobile, SpotHero, and Parking Panda allow users the ability to be as informed as possible and take control of their parking. There are wide-ranging benefits with minor 221 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 57 infrastructure changes for converting the current pay system to an app-based program online. The multiple benefits to installing and implementing an app-based pay system include the ability to: • Show available parking spaces in real-time, allowing potential parkers to know exactly where to go, which would reduce and/or eliminating the need to circle • Pay for parking spaces from the app before a user begins their journey, offering peace of mind to those visiting Hermosa Beach • Expand the number of payment options, increasing the likelihood a user will park at a paid spot • Allow users to know prices and dynamic rate changes in real-time before they choose a parking spot, affording the users to make informed decisions on pricing compared to the distance to their final destination • Become informed on events in Hermosa Beach, which may influence dynamic rates and availability of parking • Pay from anywhere, pay for additional time, and know the duration of time left on the meter, eliminating the need to constantly “feed the meter,” or stress about their length of time their car has been parked Many application-based parking solution companies have demos that allow municipalities to explore solutions, demo administrative tools, implement pilot programs, and view the technical capabilities of the system. Case Study In terms of payment systems, there are various emerging technologies with a range of applications that municipalities are starting to utilize. For example, the City of Long Beach in 2018 launched the Passport parking mobile app which simplifies parking payments at their beachfront parking lots. Similarly, the City of Newport Beach launched a program called ParkMobile, which shows available parking meters in real-time in addition to reserving metered spots before a user arrives. Recommendation #2 Design and Implement a Demand-Based Parking Management Program Cost: High Level of Difficulty: High Priority: Average Implementation Timeline: Long-Term Zones for Implementation: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 Related Study Goals: #2, #3 Why? Static parking rates do not match the level of demand or patterns of behavior. For example, silver post meters in Hermosa Beach are set at $1.25 every hour, then $1.50 every hour after 8:00 PM. In addition, yellow post meters are always $1.25 every hour, including those adjacent to Lot A. Often, on-street prices cost less than off-street prices, which can provide incentive for drivers to circle and wait in traffic to find the best deal. In this system, some spaces may be 222 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 58 underutilized. Additionally, the current Hermosa Beach parking system varies in payment, information and technology; this can overwhelm the user and decrease the system’s value. It is recommended that the City of Hermosa Beach look to adopt and implement a demand- based parking program that adjusts rates and regulations to make it as easy as possible for users to find a parking space. The main goal of this demand-based pricing strategy is to ensure consistent availability of parking spaces while distributing parking demand throughout the Coastal Zone, with additional revenue as a positive effect. Ideally, this demand-based program would allow off-street parking to be a cheaper, long-term option, as opposed to using on-street spaces for long-term parking. Alternatively, on-street parking should be available to be the short-term parking solution. The City should also look to price public parking assets at a lower rate for centralized locations in order to promote a “park once/walk many” environment. Visitors not having to go back to their cars to feed meters or to add time allow the centralized parking locations to be more utilized for longer periods of the day. How? In this program, parking demand will set the “right price” at all times, which is the lowest price that will achieve a set target of parking availability. The demand-based parking management system can be developed with the following actionable items: • Set specific availability targets for on- and off-street parking locations. It is recommended that no more than 85% occupancy should be targeted at all times in each of the eight zones. (For instance, 100% occupancy in Zone 5 and 50% occupancy in Zone 3, totaling 85% occupancy would not meet the target.) • Establish minimum and maximum parking price changes for demand, like increasing rates by $1 during the high demand periods. Peer city Laguna Beach fluctuates parking charges between $1 and $2 per hour, while Huntington Beach fluctuates between $1 and $3 an hour. The best price rate to set is one that allows 85% availability at all times. On-going monitoring of occupancy is necessary to determine the rate that achieves the 85 percent target. • Mark meters and lots based upon convenience and demand on tiers of price, such as ‘premium’, ‘value’, or ‘discount’. A tiered system can be found at airport and sports stadiums traditionally but can be applicable for Hermosa Beach as well. • Track occupancy data, including location, and length of stay per car, to create algorithms to predict demand and adjust pricing accordingly by reading collected meter data. • Develop a database with this inventory and occupancy information to provide staff real- time understanding of utilization. Include parking regulations and key enforcement metrics. • Evaluate price-determining rate methodologies at least annually and adjust as needed with the intent to allow a consistent occupancy rate that allows the lowest prices while avoiding a parking shortage. • Make parking inventory and occupancy data open to the public by creating an online website in which transportation users can view relevant parking information such as location, prices, and restrictions. • Issue reports approximately every six months to inform city staff, key stakeholders, City Council, and the public on system performance. System performance would be measured upon revenue generation, occupancy statistics, citation numbers, and parking user satisfaction. 223 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 59 The program implementation should have effective outreach and messaging including: • An overall demand-based program brand • Marketing materials, including websites, apps, social media, brochures, ads, and service announcements • On-going workshops and trainings with downtown stakeholders • Use of social media platforms to communicate system information and updates This recommendation should be implemented in all parking zones where metered or paid spaces exist, but would be most impactful in the Downtown Core which would see the highest turnover of short-term parking users. Specific streets include Hermosa Avenue from 8th Street to 16th Street, and Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive. Although implementing this initiative requires a high level of cost and difficulty, this is a high priority recommendation. Case Study SFpark in San Francisco implemented a major price reform for on-street parking. The City of San Francisco established pilot zones with sensors that reported the occupancy of each curb on every block. Parking rates were adjusted solely on observed occupancies to charge the lowest prices possible without creating a parking shortage. A target range was set between 60% and 80% occupancy, with prices readjusting every 3 hours. After the pilot, 31% of the cases noted an increase in prices, prices decreased in 30% of the cases, and remained the same in 39% of the cases. In two years, 62% of the blocks were within the target range (60%- 80%), a 30% increase from before the pilot began. San Francisco uses all of its parking revenue from SFpark to subsidize public transit.24 Recommendation #3 Invest and Implement in a Comprehensive Parking Signage & Wayfinding System Cost: Average Level of Difficulty: Average Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Mid-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals: #2, #3 Why? Parking signs are critical to the success of the parking network, however signage that varies from zone to zone can create confusion. Providing a well-designed, branded parking signage system can effectively communicate critical wayfinding information the second you enter the city, enabling visitors to find venues and parking options more easily. A lack of consistent signage can lead to additional congestion, driver confusion, and potential conflicts between pedestrians/bicycles/vehicles as vehicles look for parking. These negative factors can lead to 24 SFpark: Pricing Parking by Demand by Gregory Pierce and Donald Shoup 224 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 60 an outcome where available parking options are underutilized, solely because motorists do not know where available parking exists. Signage and wayfinding is a core component of communicating a demand-based management program. As mentioned in Recommendation #3, street signage should be used to display pricing tiers and level of availability for multiple parking locations so drivers can make an informed decision. How? In conjunction with Recommendation #, dynamic signage and wayfinding becomes especially important to communicate pricing, regulations, and parking availability. A Wayfinding Plan should be a part of the Demand-Based Parking Management Program. The wayfinding plan should include: • A signage implementation program that is created in conjunction with city stakeholders • Wayfinding and signage that serve the customer to make finding parking and payment as easy as possible • Dynamic and variable sign messaging that is recognizable, intuitive, and strategically placed • Uniform and distinct signage that is reflective of Hermosa’s Beach’s character and promote a sense of place • Real time availability information via on-the-ground signage, advanced signage, a one- stop website, and a mobile phone application. • Marketable information about a new parking wayfinding strategy Wayfinding would be applicable in all eight zones, especially at key destinations and entry points within the city. Key entry points include all streets that have access to cross the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt, including Gould Avenue, Pier Avenue, and 8th Street. Priority and cost for this recommendation is high while level of difficulty is average. Case Study Laguna Beach implemented a similar marketing/signage parking pilot program in 2014, utilizing dynamic electronic message boards and consistent wayfinding. The pilot program led to a 25% decrease in expired-meter parking citations and a 36% increase in total parking revenue. Their program has since been continued. 225 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 61 Maximize Use of Existing Parking Supply Maximizing the existing parking supply is a crucial element of parking management and is aligned with Study Goals 1 and 2. This strategy aims to extract more value out of all existing private and public parking by expanding shared parking and maximizing curb space. Recommendation #4 Pilot a Shared Parking Program and Facilitate Shared Parking Cost: Average Level of Difficulty: Average Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Long-Term Zones for Implementation: 5, 6, 8 Related Study Goals: #2, #3 Why? Shared parking programs maximize use of existing parking facilities, reduce the need for additional parking, reduce congestion, and facilitate more walkable and active downtowns. Determining the most efficient use of parking facilities is crucial to the success and growth of the Hermosa Beach Downtown Core. Hermosa Beach currently undertakes numerous shared parking plans in the Coastal Zone (such as plans noted in Table 5.1), including shared parking between private entities on the same site, but shared parking agreements between private entities on separate properties or between private and public entities in the Coastal Zone could further increase parking availability for visitors. Not all private parking needs to be shared, but even if 25% of private parking can be included in a shared parking arrangement during any portion of a day, public parking supply in the Coastal Zone can increase by 60 spaces at a fraction of the cost of new construction of parking facilities. Shared parking works best when multiple uses have different peak use periods such as an office, which typically does not operate or reach peak parking demand during the evening hours, can be paired with a restaurant or assembly use that is primarily used during those evening hours. How? To facilitate shared parking among private property owners, the City can proactively provide technical assistance. This may include: • The creation of a parking ownership database, connecting parties to each other. • Educational materials about the benefits of shared parking. • Sample language and agreements. • Cost and revenue sharing information. • Potential use of technology/ signage. The City could take the lead in engaging property owners in their willingness to develop private-private or public-private shared parking agreements. These agreements could allow for the City to: • Directly lease parking from a private facility for use in public parking. 226 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 62 • Open parking for public use at certain hours or days, depending on the tenant use. • Facilitate shared agreements between nearby properties with different peak hours. • Collect data to facilitate demand-based management of each shared parking agreement. • Incentivize business owners to open up their parking to other uses during off-hours through the provision of an umbrella liability policy or agreements to tow unauthorized users. Implementation of this recommendation would see the best results in Zone 5 (Walk Street – Downtown), Zone 6 (Sand Section – Civic Center), and Zone 8 (Sand Section – Cypress) due to the concentration of private parking supply in these zones, as well as the fact that parking in Zone 8 is currently not time-restricted. There is an average level of cost and high level of difficulty for this medium priority recommendation stemming from coordination, feasibility studies, and agreement implementation. Recommendation #5 Maximize Flexibility of Curb Space to Accommodate Rideshare and Other Modes Cost: Low Level of Difficulty: Average Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: 5, 6 Related Study Goals: #2, #3 Why? Through previous studies, every curb and parking space within the Coastal Zone has been inventoried by street segment and curb type. Curb types and their roles are static. A loading zone, for instance, stays as a loading zone at all times even if it is only used during specific days. Off- and on-street facilities should be inventoried in a manner that allows for real-time understanding of parking by curb regulation type by time of day and day of week, to evaluate the potential for other uses of curb space. Curb space in the Coastal Zone is currently occupied mostly by metered or unmetered on- street parking. As of May 2019, Hermosa Beach has created three new rideshare zones in a four-block area on Hermosa Avenue between 10th and 14th Streets within Zone 5 (Walk Street – Downtown). The designated rideshare zones were converted from previously underutilized taxi zones. The City has communicated the availability of the new zones through updates to their website as well as signage and mobile ridesharing application updates. Dedicating curb space for ridesharing near Pier Plaza is a great example of maximizing the use of curb space and provides more opportunities to access the beach and the Downtown Core efficiently. How? To continue to maximize the flexibility of the curb space in the Coastal Zone, the City should monitor the newly-designated rideshare zones and additionally, evaluate the use of supplemental valet service. To achieve this, the City can: 227 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 63 • Utilize the inventory and occupancy database mentioned in Recommendation #3 to track curb space utilization and parking regulations at all times of day and week. • Conduct resident, visitor, employee, and employer intercept surveys to evaluate the success of the new rideshare zones, measuring frequency of use and proper locations. • Evaluate the need for additional designated rideshare zones, if appropriate. • Evaluate curb space and re-configure spaces where appropriate to maximize the use of red zones or re-configure spaces to accommodate on-street parking space for other modes through bicycle corrals, motorcycle parking, or Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) parking. These methods of maximizing curb space would be most effective in Zone 5 (Walk Street – Downtown) and Zone 6 (Sand Section – Civic Center). Priority for this recommendation is high compared to other recommendations, with low cost, and an average level of difficulty. Case Study The Institute of Transportation Engineers has recently released their Curbside Management Practitioners Guide which details planning considerations, available tools and treatments, and the treatment selection process for curbside management. In this guide, ITE highlights the City of Seattle as a standout example of flexing curb spaces to allow streets to safely and efficiently connect and move people and goods to their destinations while creating inviting spaces within the right-of-way. In the study, Seattle was able to reduce commercial vehicle loading zones during peak parking periods and flex them back during prime loading/unloading times, which has led to an increase in curbside efficiency. Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand Hermosa Beach can reduce parking demand by providing safe, accessible, and convenient options for residents, employees, and visitors to access the beach without a car. Mobility options such as public transit, bicycling, car share, bike share, micro-mobility, and walking would all factor in to reduce vehicle demand. Reinvesting parking revenues for this cause is key to the success of the Downtown Core and the rest of the Coastal Zone. Recommendation #6 Reinvest Parking Revenues into Multimodal Improvements Cost: Low Level of Difficulty: Low Priority: Average Implementation Timeline: Mid-Term Zones for Implementation: 5, 6 Related Study Goals: #2, #3 Why? Every motorist becomes a pedestrian at some point on their trip. Parking is about more than vehicle storage; it is about access and mobility. For every trip taken by alternative mode, there is another parking space available for someone who drives. Demand-based management 228 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 64 may create additional revenue, which, in turn, should be used in programs that directly support multimodal improvements in the Coastal Zone. Parking utilization data shows that many prime on-street parking spaces are full, while many off-street spaces outside the core remain empty throughout the day. Multimodal transportation can help alleviate and redistribute parking demand. This would improve connections to underutilized parking assets to distribute parking demand more evenly. An example would be a pilot program to introduce peripheral parking outside of the high- demand areas in conjunction with a frequent shuttle circulator. Hermosa Beach has been successful in improving multimodal accessibility by enhancing bicycle access on Hermosa Avenue, maintaining a scramble crossing at Hermosa Avenue and Pier Avenue, implementing bulb-outs, maintaining vibrant zebra pedestrian crossings, and increasing shade and lighting. Hermosa Beach can build on these efforts by providing more bicycle hubs, drop-off and rideshare cutouts, and more transit opportunities. How? The City should increase and diversify the allocation of parking revenue to investments that will improve overall mobility in the Downtown Core. These improvements include: • Improved pedestrian, bicycle, and multimodal mobility, especially to and from parking outside the Downtown Core. For instance Hermosa Beach’s proposed bicycle facilities includes many Class III bike routes, but does not propose any bike paths or bike lanes in the Coastal Zone. Hermosa Beach could increase the number of pedestrian plazas to fulfill the goal to create a pedestrian-oriented district. • Streamlined implementation of bike-share, rideshare, public transit, and potential circulator shuttle. • The evaluation of micro-transit use to establish a remote parking network and improve alternative mobility. • Shared parking initiatives to improve access to parking for the general public, as mentioned in Recommendation #4. • A Coastal Zone Wayfinding System, as mentioned in Recommendation #3. • Promotions encouraging employees to bike and walk to work. • Enhanced event management, as mentioned in Recommendation #8. • Improved marketing and communication of the parking system, as mentioned in Recommendation #3. • Technology upgrades to the parking system, as mentioned in Recommendations #1 and #3. • Streetscape and safety improvements, including parking enforcement and street cleaning. • Evaluation of the potential to continue the shared mobility program currently being piloted with neighboring cities. • Further evaluation and monitoring of parking initiatives, as mentioned in Recommendation #11. Hermosa Beach can also look to mobility initiatives in addition to mobility investments. Alternative mobility initiatives also include: • Create an employee parking database including store location and employee origin, and mode of transportation. • Travel training and analysis for employees. 229 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 65 • Branding and marketing highlighting the ease of switching from vehicle to alternative commute mode. • Pursue incentives for employers who provide demand-management initiatives for employees. • Create “Bike to Work” days. • Free or subsidized transit passes. • Subsidized shuttles, carpools, guaranteed rides home, and other programs. • Bicycle/ pedestrian safety and encouragement programs. • Restrict employee parking to top floors of structures for long term occupants Revenue would be generated from all parking spaces excluding unmetered spaces, and should be reinvested in in all zones, with Zone 5 (Walk Street – Downtown) being at the top of the priority list. Priority, cost, and difficulty are all low for this recommendation. Case Study Laguna Beach teamed up with OCTA in 2016 to start the Summer Breeze trolley service. Summer Breeze is a summer-only route that allows users to park remotely and shuttle them to Downtown Laguna Beach at no expense for the user. The service runs only on Saturdays and Sundays from 11:00 am to midnight from late June to early September. Providing a multimodal alternative for visitors reduces Laguna Beach’s parking demand in its downtown core and also alleviates congestion in the street network locating the lots on the outskirts of the city. One of the issues facing the City of Hermosa Beach is a long-term parking shortage, and implementing a similar remote parking with shuttle service like Summer Breeze could relocate a portion of long-term parkers outside of the Downtown. Simplify and Leverage the Zoning Code Simplifying and leveraging the zoning code to work in favor of a pedestrian-oriented district supports Goal #3 from Section 1.3. Pedestrians should have just as much access and mobility options as vehicles on the road, and the following recommendation supports this end. Recommendation #7 Revise the Zoning Code to Better Reflect Urban Uses and Walkable Commercial Uses in the Coastal Zone Cost: Average Level of Difficulty: Average Priority: Average Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals: #1, #3 Why? In the Coastal Zone, undeveloped parcels are all but gone, and most future development will utilize existing buildings and/or smaller parcels. Flexible and innovative management of 230 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 66 parking and mobility in the zoning code will be crucial to support this type of infill development and continued reinvestment. The existing code offers opportunities for improvement and revision, as data analysis has shown discrepancies between minimum code requirements, actual parking provided, and adjusted parking demand for non-residential uses. How? Some zoning code revisions that can be made to better suit Hermosa Beach include: • Adjust parking minimums within the Downtown District to their “right-size” according to demand for specific uses, specifically offices, retail, and restaurants. Uses that generate invariable demand regardless of location, such as assembly uses or visitor accommodations, may not be applicable to a parking minimum adjustment (which is consistent with peer cities). This will give property owners the flexibility to build or repurpose according to market demand. In addition, this supports the City’s land use goals to maintain the small scale, pedestrian-oriented character of Downtown. See Appendix C for examples of parking minimums established in peer cities with similar parking demand. • Consider no parking minimums in certain pedestrian-emphasized locations within Zone 5: Walk Street -Downtown and Zone 6: Sand Section - Civic Center. • For the addition to a building, addition of outdoor space, or a change in use, allow required parking to be reduced by providing implementing extensive transportation demand management measures. • Reduce or exempt requirement of additional parking for certain uses that change to uses typically considered more intensive in the zoning code, like restaurant or food service use, when located in a pedestrian district provided that square footage remains the same. This reduction of exemption would not be applicable to uses that generate consistent demand, such as assembly uses or visitor accommodations. • Allow for in-lieu fees to contribute more towards on-site parking requirements to improve development and tenant flexibility to produce context-sensitive design. This would allow property owners to consider a greater reduction in on-site spaces. Revenue from fees should continue be used to fund the shared parking supply. • Consider incorporating site-specific requirements related to all mobility options. This could include linking bicycle, car share, and electric vehicle requirements in proportion to the size of a given use, phased down above a certain number of spaces. Code can also be included to allow space for micro-mobility docking as well. • Allow trip reduction incentives for private development to create more mode share opportunities within the City. • Incorporate design requirements that support a walkable environment. These include: o Limit driveways and driveway widths along walkable corridors. o Provide high-visibility pedestrian accommodations at crosswalks and curb cuts, such as signage, striping, or flashing lights. o Incentivize the design and construction of parking that can be converted to active uses. o Parklets, or an extension of the sidewalk into one or more on-street parking spaces, at pedestrian-oriented locations. Parklets introduce new streetscape features such as seating, planting, bicycle parking, or elements of play. o Pedestrian/ Bike Plazas, whether temporary or permanent, have potential in dead-end or short street segments with little auto-oriented needs. Examples for opportunity include any numbered street, such as 11th Court, west of Beach Drive. 231 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 67 A revision of the zoning code would be applicable throughout the City. Revising the zoning code has moderate cost and moderate difficulty. This recommendation has average priority compared to other recommendations. Case Study In July 2017, the City of Santa Monica updated their parking code based upon the Parking Zoning Ordinance Update (2013) completed by Nelson\Nygaard. The land uses in the city were split among three designations: Downtown Core, Transit-Oriented and Mixed Use, and Low-Intensity Neighborhood. In 2015, the City took the approximate designation boundaries established in this plan to adopt a new off-street parking code that regulated parking into three separate categories: Citywide, Parking Overlay Area 1, and the Downtown Community Plan Area. Both the Citywide and Parking Overlay Area 1 designations set parking minimums. The Downtown Community Plan Area set parking maximums but eliminated any parking minimums required of new development. The Plan included amendments to the existing ordinance and new zoning ordinance provisions for: • Parking waivers • Parking maximums • Parking in-lieu fees • Leasing programs • Unbundled parking • Carsharing • Parking cashout The City could formulate an EV Action Plan, similar to the Santa Monica EV Action Plan, which plans to have 300 smart chargers in the City by 2022. Additionally, in Santa Monica, businesses with over 10 employees are given a choice between three TDM strategies and must implement at least one or pay a fee for each parking space per day. The City of Santa Monica provides a mandatory survey to determine Average Vehicle Ridership in which the results determine a reduction in fee for workplaces with high non-auto ridership. 232 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 68 Enhance Parking Administration and Operations To better plan for the daily and peak parking demand for its visitors, employees, and residents, parking management programs will effectively minimize the stress on parking supply. This strategy recommends enhancing event management practices, improving residential and employee permit parking programs, and establishing a monitoring and evaluation process to adapt to different events, businesses, and various uses coming into the City. Recommendation #8 Enhance Event Management Practices to Maximize Parking System Flexibility and Predictability Cost: Low Level of Difficulty: Low Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals: #2, #3 Why? Hermosa Beach is home to many unique and diverse events each year. These events spur economic activity and are a fundamental part of Hermosa Beach’s character and culture. However, events can place a burden on the parking system and disrupt access due to street closures and increased numbers of visitors. Today, there are limited requirements for producers of mid to large-scale events to implement alternative transportation plans for participants/spectators of their events, as well as the general beach-going population when event production may require the use of nearby public parking. There are also opportunities to ensure consistent communication of event parking policies, from communications strategies, signage, and alternative options available. These issues can create a disconnected system that oversaturates certain areas or impacts beachgoers. How? There are a number of strategies to maximize the parking system for each event effectively and consistently. These strategies include: • Adjust parking rates via the demand-based program (Recommendation #2) to include peak event pricing in high demand areas. Conversely, value, discount, or 233 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 69 remote peripheral parking should be priced at a lower rate to incentivize use of those areas to balance demand and reduce traffic. • Provide online information and education in advance of the event (similar to Recommendation #3), including location-based prices and parking locations to limit searching, traffic, and frustration. Parking information can be linked to information provided by event organizers, hotels, tickets, and key event stakeholders. • Provide GPS-compatible updates with real-time utilization to allow event-goers to begin their search for parking at their origin, not their destination. • Coordinate temporary signage during the event permitting process to divert and direct drivers to multiple parking locations. This signage can be dynamic to instruct best parking locations in real time. • Implement a pilot program for purchasing parking for off-street locations in advance of an event. Advanced purchases can be advantageous to both users and operators, as it makes parking demand more predictable and ensures that available spaces are effectively used, reducing congestion related to circling. Advanced parking purchases can be incentivized by allowing lower rates than those who park without a reservation. No parking lot should be reserved completely, as parking facilities should still allow short-term spontaneous parking for those who may not have access to the technology to do so, or for visitors who may be unaware of the program. Pavemint is a parking application in Los Angeles that allows the ability to reserve parking weeks in advance, a similar approach could be applied to Hermosa Beach. • Use dynamic parking inventory mentioned in Recommendation #1 to predict potential event demand hotspots. • Coordinate event-based shuttle systems if needed, during the event permitting process. Shuttles can be used to reduce the distance barrier from the user’s car to the event location. Coordination with peripheral lot owners, such as schools and churches, including those outside of the City limits, are encouraged. • Require an event parking plan during the event permitting process, regardless of event size. Smaller events may require fewer demand management strategies, but event parking plans should be developed to adequately manage and accommodate the variety of Hermosa Beach events. The size of event and therefore the level of parking demand management strategies should be determined by the Impact Level already established in the Hermosa Beach Special Events Policy Guide. Event parking management would be applicable in all zones that incorporate events. Priority is rated high for this strategy while cost, and difficulty are low for this recommendation. Case Study The City of Long Beach provides multiple large events every year that are completely inaccessible by automobile, such as the Smokin’ Grooves Fest and Once Upon a Time in the LBC. For these events, event attendees park in designated structures in the Downtown Area, 234 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 70 and shuttle to the event site using two shuttle locations. Attendees can pre-pay for a parking spot in one of the designated structures using an official Long Beach web portal. Rideshare drop-offs are only allowed to the shuttle stop locations and not at the event site. Besides the shuttle, attendees can either walk, bus, water taxi to the event grounds. The capacity for these events is set above 10,000 attendees. Recommendation #9 Improve the Residential Parking Permit Program Cost: Low Level of Difficulty: High Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals: #2, #3 Why? With the amount of residential uses in the Coastal Zone, residents are a crucial part of the parking discussion when considering efficient solutions to meet the parking needs of the Coastal Zone. As mentioned in Section 1.1 of this report, the City’s Preferential Parking District Permit Program currently allows residential parking permit holders to park at 24-hour meters without paying the meter, or in one-hour residential zones without regard to time limit for up to 72 hours. The preferential parking district is bound by the City’s northern and southern boundaries, by the Strand on the West, and Loma Drive, Park Avenue, and Morningside Drive to the east. Residential permits cost $40 annually and require that the vehicle is registered to an address in the Preferential Parking Permit District. Currently, the City does not place a limit on the number of permits purchased per household. Furthermore, many residents utilize their garage space as storage rather than parking spaces and park on-street, which exacerbates occupancies on many residential streets. With recent interest from the City, the residential parking permit program should be revisited to establish a system that is equitable, yet supports a reduction in parking demand. Data and observations from City of Hermosa Beach Parking Enforcement demonstrated that the City sells almost twice the number of residential parking permits than spaces available. Peer cities, such as Newport Beach and Corona Del Mar, price residential parking permits at an escalating rate, so the price for each additional permit per household increases. How? It is recommended that the first annual permit per household is priced at $40 to stay in line with the current Hermosa Beach rate, while the second permit is priced at $60, the third at $80, and the last permit at $100 for a maximum of 4 permits. These rates provided are an average of multiple peer cities methods and prices for limiting the number of permits provided. 235 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 71 After sufficient data is collected, the City of Hermosa Beach can create residential parking zones for areas in need of greater restrictions, similar to a recently adopted permit program by the City of Newport Beach. Hermosa Beach would essentially create eight residential parking zones using the same boundaries established in the data collection process, as these bounds were created specifically to distinguish between car-restrictive sections in the Coastal Zone. Using zones for residential parking is beneficial as it would prevent residents from using their residential pass for other areas in the City, which could oversaturate demand in specific areas. Guest permits can be registered by their license plate number through an official Hermosa Beach online web portal to ensure guest permits are non-transferrable and cannot be used past their allotted time. Parking enforcement would be able to determine if a license is permitted through an online, real-time database. Residential parking locations should be subject to parking for only the residence assigned to the permit. An online database of guest parking permit requests can be managed after its creation to determine what residential areas require the most guest permits, and how many permits are being issued per day of week, or time of year. A cap on guest parking permits or any other relevant modifications to the system should be considered after substantial data has been collected in the guest permit database. For instance, the City of Carlsbad caps guest parking permits at five two-week passes a year. Residents with extra spaces can post on the app, and can be used in conjunction with special events. Hermosa Beach can implement a test guest parking restriction to allow permits to be available for up to 30 days in a year, or 3 times a month. App-based guest parking solutions are also a possibility. Pavemint is a parking application in Los Angeles that allows people to connect residents with people who have an extra parking space to share. An update for residential and employee parking permits would be valuable in all parking zones. Updating residential parking permits has high priority, with high difficulty and low cost. Case Study The City of Newport Beach has adopted a comprehensive parking permit program that provides residential permits in zones. There are three residential zones where residents in those zones can apply for their respective residential permit. Permits can be purchased through an official Newport Beach web portal. Permit holders of a single zone cannot park in the other zones. Creating specific zones for residential permits ensures permit holders must stay with a certain boundary to use their permit. 236 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 72 Recommendation #10 Improve the Employee Parking Permit Program Cost: Low Level of Difficulty: Low Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals: #2, #3 Why? Employees are also a crucial part of the parking discussion as many employees come from outside of the Coastal Zone and contribute to parking demand daily. Currently, employees of local businesses are allowed to purchase parking permits for an additional fee in designated areas. For employees, monthly permits are available for off-street parking lots/structures at a cost of: • $62 per month to park anytime up to 72 hrs • $31 per month to park only between 5am to 7pm daily Employee permits are also available to purchase that allow employees to park at on-street spaces with yellow pole/cap meters and in the unmetered, but one-hour time restricted areas at an annual cost of $143 (pro-rated to $71.50 on September 1st). How? The employee parking permit program should be retained, however the City should update the locations and pricing of employee permit parking to encourage off-street parking availability for employees. It is preferred that on-street parking be reserved for short-term users to promote higher turnover. Programs and alternative mobility initiatives, such as those mentioned in Recommendation #5 can reduce employee parking demand. Improving mobility choice does not mean that every employee has to stop driving. In fact, a shift in behavior for a fraction of employees can have a significant impact on reducing parking demand and congestion. An update for residential and employee parking permits would be especially valuable in Zone 5 (Walk Zone – Downtown) and Zone 6 (Sand Section – Civic Center), as these zones contain a large concentration of retail and commercial uses. Updating the employee parking permits has high priority, with low difficulty and cost. Case Study UCLA introduced the BruinGO program in an effort to incentivize students and employees to utilize transit instead of commuting by single-occupancy vehicles. The UCLA BruinGO program is an unlimited access transit program which subsidized the cost of transit commutes for students and university employees. The goals of the study were to increase bus ridership to campus, reduce vehicle trips to campus, and to reduce parking demand on campus. 237 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 73 Commutes by bus increased by 73% after just one year of the program’s initiation. In addition, 37% of new bus riders were previously solo drivers to campus. Over 1,000 solo drivers relinquished their parking permits after BruinGO’s initiation, and 19% of commuters who kept their permit still took BruinGO at least two times a week. Since the introduction of the program as an alternative to solo driving, UCLA was able to utilize this service to recruit new employees to the university while also reducing fare payments for riders and reducing the demand for parking. Recommendation #11 Establish an Ongoing Collection, Monitoring, and Evaluation Process Cost: Low Level of Difficulty: Low Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals: #2, #3 Why? For parking, you can only manage what you measure. This recommendation seeks to improve the “measurement” process by creating a centralized parking database established in a new demand-based parking management program. This program, as previously mentioned, would create real-time data automatically, which would move the focus away from manual data collection and unwieldy datasets, and onto innovative parking analysis for monitoring and evaluation. Decisions based on high-level real-time data would be exponentially quicker and can be made with more confidence. If real-time data is not feasible, the City can conduct before and after studies or introduce pilot programs to test the efficiency of various programs and initiatives. Each iteration of data monitoring will allow the City to make informed decisions regarding the continued use of the recommendations, as well as real-time modifications or adjustments to the system as needed. The parking system will always need to be monitored and evaluated, especially due to seasonal change or event management. How? To better track, monitor, and evaluate data, the City can: • Develop and implement specific methodologies for tracking occupancy data for on- and off-street parking. Initial approaches could include manual spot counts and could evolve into utilizing algorithms based on meter and payment data. • There are many innovative technologies available that can be used to collect and track parking data. Technologies include: smart meters, magnetometers, lasers, inductive loops, ultrasound, or automated license plate readers. Some technologies are more suited for parking lots or garages, while others are better for large zones and on-street counting. • Establish data-sharing protocols, including making inventory and occupancy data “open source,” as mentioned in Recommendation #2. 238 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 74 • Issue quarterly reports on system performance for parking/city staff and key stakeholders, as also mentioned in Recommendation #2. The collection, monitoring and evaluation system would be valuable for the entire Coastal Zone. Priority for this recommendation is high, with a low cost and low level of difficulty to implement. Case Study The City of Los Angeles and LADOT launched LA Express Park in 2012 which is a parking management strategy with innovative parking data collection and monitoring. LA Express Park was implemented to achieve 10% to 30% parking space availability on each block by using demand-based pricing. The system relied upon a highly integrated back-end system with an advanced pricing engine. The system required a continuous compiling of occupancy and payment data, analyzing it, and then relaying information to customers and enforcement officials in real-time. After the first 6 months, parking congestion decreased by 10%, under- utilized parking spaces decreased by 5%, pilot-wide parking rates decreased by 11%, and parking revenue increased by 2%. Provide Additional Public Parking as Needed In some cases, provision of additional parking resources is necessary for zones that are truly constrained by physical impediments and constantly yield high occupancy. Adding parking spaces should be done strategically and with substantial caution, as new resources such as parking garages or structures are cost-prohibitive and could be obsolete within the next decade. This recommendation should be treated as the recommendation with the lowest priority. Recommendation #12 Strategically Invest in New Public and Shared Parking Supply in Key Locations Cost: High Level of Difficulty: High Priority: Low Implementation Timeline: Long-Term Zones for Implementation: 5, 6, 8 Related Study Goals: #2 Why? Hermosa Beach’s success as a destination for residents and visitors has attracted new development in the Coastal Zone. Multimodal access, complimented by convenient and accessible parking, is a key factor for the Downtown Core’s success. After a study of parking demand, analysis indicates that parking demand often peaks above optimal capacity rates in Zone 3 (Walk Street – Sand Section North), Zone 5 (Walk Street – Downtown), Zone 7 (Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo), and Zone 8 (Sand Section – Cypress). 239 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 75 Hermosa Beach faces a parking management problem, not a parking problem; spaces are available during peak times, drivers may just be unaware of their availability or unwilling to park further from their destination. Adding more parking, especially private spaces, could exacerbate the City’s current dilemma should those spaces remain underutilized. Nevertheless, to provide adequate parking for current and continued growth in the Coastal Zone, Hermosa Beach could strategically invest in public and shared parking supply in key locations. How? Recommendations #1 through #11 should be prioritized to address current issues related to high on- and off-street demand, time limit violations, varied signage, fragmented technology and payment systems. All decisions to build more parking should be evaluated against the City of Hermosa Beach’s primary goals to reduce vehicular congestion and improve multimodal travel established in PLAN Hermosa and the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy. Creating additional parking can also bring more vehicles into the Coastal Zone if motorists find that more spaces are available. New structures should be evaluated based upon their cost effectiveness/potential revenue compared to other recommendations presented above, which are designed to improve overall management, enhance mobility, and reduce demand for parking. It is recommended that the City conduct independent need, market, funding and fiscal studies for constructing a multi-story parking structure within the Civic Center or Cypress character area. For Lot A, conversion of the parking lot to a parking structure identical to Lot C, for example, would increase the total number of spaces by approximately 22425. Assuming a full capacity in the potential Lot A structure by transferring as many on-street parked cars into Lot A, on-street parking occupancy in Zone 5 would drop from 94% to 65% on peak weekday afternoons. This potential decrease in on-street occupancy at the busiest measured time in a highly commercialized zone would have secondary benefits such as reducing occupancy rates in neighboring zones, as parking would become easier to find closer to the Downtown District and the beach. There is a significantly greater cost associated with constructing a parking structure compared to other recommendations, but the benefits of increasing supply in Zone 5 (Walk Street – Downtown), Zone 6 (Sand Section – Civic Center), and Zone 8 (Sand Section – Cypress) may be necessary to alleviate current or future parking constraints throughout Hermosa Beach. When considering constructing renovations to existing parking lots, efforts can be guided from the Hermosa Beach Parking Lot D Demonstration Project with respect to proposed design improvements, sustainability features, and plant palettes in order to maintain consistency throughout the Coastal Zone among public parking. This is the recommendation with the lowest priority, but has an associated high level of difficulty and cost. Case Study 25 Lot C, a three-story structure, has 354 spaces. Lot A, a surface lot, has 130 spaces. The difference between the two lots is 224 spaces. Although more research needs to be done on the exact number of added spaces including the size of the lot and its compatible use with adjacent buildings, using Lot C as a potential duplicate in this report gives a rough estimate for a Lot A three-story parking structure. 240 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 76 The Pacific Beach Visitor Oriented Parking Facilities Study by Wilbur Smith Associates analyzed a potential future parking structure in the San Diego area. The study showed that an efficient structure must be consumer friendly, be a good neighbor, be operationally efficient, and have a certain ease of implementation. Some factors that should be considered in deciding to build a structure are: • Capacity considerations • Existing Use • Site accessibility for both vehicles and pedestrians • Compatibility with adjacent uses • Proximity to principal parking generators and areas with parking deficiencies • Security/ visibility • Environmental considerations, including potential noise and visual impacts • Sources of funding • An increase of rideshare and the onset of autonomous vehicles This study found that the revenue generated by erecting a parking structure would be far short of the amount needed to cover the costs of operation and the debt service of the bonds issued to fund the construction of the structure. 241 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 77 Appendix A 242 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 78 Appendix B Appendix B – Hermosa Beach and Peer City Code Matrix Land Use (1 space per sf) Hermosa Beach Long Beach Santa Monica Newport Beach Laguna Beach Manhattan Beach Huntington Beach Carlsbad Redondo Beach Commercial / Retail 25026 250 300 250 250 200 or 250 200 300 250 Commercial / Retail (Overlay District) 333 500 450 or 500 0 spaces 250 Reduced rate27 200 300 250 Office / Professional 250 250 or 500 300 250 or 300 or 35028 250 300 250 or 300 250 250 Office / Professional (Overlay District) 333 500 or 1,000 300 or 500 0 spaces 250 Reduced rate 250 or 300 300 250 Medical Office (Overlay District) 333 400 250 or 300 0 spaces29 250 Reduced rate 175 200 150 Restaurant 100 100 125 or 200 or 500 30 to 5030 100 200 60 Gradual rate31 75 Restaurant (Overlay District) 100 100 125 or 200 or 500 0 spaces 100 Reduced rate 60 Gradual rate 250 Fast Food 50 300 300 50 100 200 200 Gradual rate 75 Service / Repair 1,000 300 300 500 300 500 500 300 250 General Assembly 50 3.3 seats 4 seats 3 seats 3 seats 10032 3533 5 seats 5 seats Light Manufacturing 300 500 400 500 or 1,000 500 750 500 400 500 Warehousing / Storage 1,000 1,000 1,000 2,000 1,00034 1,500 1,000 1,000 Gradual rate35 26 For all uses, rates are to be read as 1 space per number given. For instance, for Commercial uses in Hermosa Beach the parking requirement is 1 parking space per 250 square feet. 27 For all overlay districts in Manhattan Beach: If the site GFA is equal or less than lot area, no parking required; If site GFA is greater than lot area, full parking requirements excluding 5,000 sf and above is required. Code can be circumvented with a use permit if found that demand is less than what is required, and long-term occupancy will not generate additional demand. 28 1 space per 250 sf for first 50 tsf; 1 space per 300 sf after 75 tsf; 1 space per 350 sf after 125 tsf 29 A rate of 1 space per 200 sf to be applied for medical office outside of the Newport Beach overlay district. 30 Of public restaurant area 31 For all food uses in Carlsbad: 1 space per 100 sf for the first 4,000 sf, plus 1 space per every 50 sf thereafter 32 100 sf of seating area 33 35 sf of assembly area 34 Plus two spaces 35 For warehousing and storage in Redondo Beach: 1 space per 1,000 sf for the first 10,000, plus 1 space per every 5,000 sf thereafter 243 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 79 Appendix C C.1 Victoria Transportation Policy Institute From the Victoria Transportation Policy Institute Transportation Demand Management Encyclopedia (https://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm28.htm, November 2018): The table below is taken from the Parking Management chapter of the TDM Encyclopedia and summarizes parking management strategies, indicates their typical reduction in parking requirements, and whether they tend to reduce vehicle traffic and therefore provide additional benefits (such as reductions in congestion, accidents, energy consumption, pollution emissions and consumer costs). Summary of Parking Management Strategies: Strategy Description Typical Reduction Traffic Reduction Shared Parking Parking spaces serve multiple users and destinations. 10-30% Parking Regulations Regulations favor higher-value uses such as service vehicles, deliveries, customers, quick errands, and people with special needs. 10-30% More Accurate and Flexible Standards Adjust parking standards to more accurately reflect demand in a particular situation. 10-30% Parking Maximums Establish maximum parking standards. 10-30% Remote Parking Provide off-site or urban fringe parking facilities. 10-30% Smart Growth Encourage more compact, mixed, multi-modal development to allow more parking sharing and use of alternative modes. 10-30% X Walking and Cycling Improvements Improve walking and cycling conditions to expand the range of destinations serviced by a parking facility. 5-15% X Increase Capacity of Existing Facilities Increase parking supply by using otherwise wasted space, smaller stalls, car stackers and valet parking. 5-15% X Mobility Management Encourage more efficient travel patterns, including changes in mode, timing, destination and vehicle trip frequency. 10-30% X Parking Pricing Charge motorists directly and efficiently for using parking facilities. 10-30% X Improve Pricing Methods Use better charging techniques to make pricing more convenient and cost effective. Varies X Financial Incentives Provide financial incentives to shift mode, such as cash out. 10-30% X Unbundle Parking Rent or sell parking facilities separately from building space. 10-30% X Parking Tax Reform Change tax policies to support parking management objectives. 5-15% X Bicycle Facilities Provide bicycle storage and changing facilities. 5-15% X Improve User Information and Marketing Provide convenient and accurate information on parking availability and price, using maps, signs, brochures and electronic communication. 5-15% X Improve Enforcement Insure that parking regulation enforcement is efficient, considerate and fair. Varies 244 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study IBI Group - August 30, 2019 80 Strategy Description Typical Reduction Traffic Reduction Transportation Management Associations Establish member-controlled organizations that provide transport and parking management services in a particular area. Varies X Overflow Parking Plans Establish plans to manage occasional peak parking demands. Varies Address Spillover Problems Use management, enforcement and pricing to address spillover problems. Varies Parking Facility Design and Operation Improve parking facility design and operations to help solve problems and support parking management. Varies C.2 Portland, OR Reduced Parking for Mixed-Use Areas Provision From page 11 of the City of Portland Off-Street Parking Management and Guiding Polices (https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/547704): In all cases, minimum parking requirements can be reduced by up to 50%, using combinations of the following provisions: • One space reduction for every 12-inch diameter tree that is preserved (reduction of up to 2 spaces, or 10% of the total required parking); • One space reduction for every 5 non-required bicycle parking spaces (reduction of up to 25% of the total required parking); • Transit-supportive plazas may replace up to 10% of required parking, provided that at least 20 parking spaces are required and certain design standards are met; • One space for every 4 motorcycle spaces provided (reduction of up to 5 spaces or 5% of the total required parking) • Two spaces for every car sharing (e.g., Zipcar) space provided (reduction of up to 25% of the total required parking); and • Three spaces for every 15-dock bike sharing station, with a further one-space reduction for each additional 4 docks (reduction of up to 25% of the total required parking). C.3 Petco Park Area Transportation Study From page 29 of the Escondido Ballpark Project Traffic Impact Analysis (https://www.escondido.org/Data/Sites/1/media/pdfs/Planning/Ballpark/TrafficImpactAnaly sis.pdf, October 2010): Petco Park conducted a Transportation Survey for the 2007 season. The survey provides information on travel characteristics of ballpark fans. The survey indicates that the automobile represents the primary mode of travel at approximately 71%. This equates to 29% for transit and other non-auto travel modes such as pedestrian, bicycle, etc. This compares with the Petco Park Environmental Impact Report (EIR) conducted in 1999 which assumed an 80% split for auto and 20% for transit/non-auto modes. 245 City of Hermosa Beach Parking Management Study and Recommended Parking Standards for the Coastal Zone SEPTEMBER 2019 48:00 246 Introduction The City of Hermosa Beach has recently undergone a planning process to define the community vision for the future of the City. Elements of the community vision have identified the need for increased parking management within the Hermosa Beach Coastal Zone. To satisfy the requirements set forth in the City’s Local Coastal Program, a parking management study was conducted for both public and private parking within the Coastal Zone. This brochure provides a summary of the resulting parking management recommendations found in the study’s technical report. The three (3) goals established for this study were based on the goals and objectives found in the City’s existing plans and documents, including PLAN Hermosa, The City of Hermosa Beach: Beach Access and Parking Study, and The City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy. Establishing these goals provided a guide for developing the recommendations to improve parking within the City’s Coastal Zone: 1. Create a parking system that meets the parking needs and demands of residents, visitors, and employees in an efficient and cost-effective manner. 2. Modify parking standards to encourage revitalization and investment in a pedestrian-oriented district. 3. Expand mobility options and optimize parking availability. In addition to these goals, the recommendations also consider results of the study’s parking inventory, occupancy, and demand analyses; existing city code requirements; industry-wide parking demand standards; and best practices by peer cities. There are twelve (12) specific recommendations categorized by six (6) overall strategies. The following pages are presented on a zone-by-zone basis, providing quick facts for each zone, and recommendations that are tailored to address the uniqueness of each zone’s infrastructure, character, and geography. 1 IBI Group . City of Hermosa Beach / Parking Management Study and Recommended Parking Standards for the Coastal Zone Cover image source: Flickr/Kent Kanouse 247 Recommendations Implement a comprehensive parking signage wayfinding system 3 Maximize flexibility of curb space to accommodate rideshare and valet service 5 STRATEGY 1: Strategicially Invest in Information and Technology Implement an app-based mobile pay system1 Design and implement a demand-based parking management program 2 Enhance event management practices to maximize parking system flexibility and predictability 8 Improve the residential parking permit program9 STRATEGY 2: Maximize Use of Existing Parking Supply Pilot a shared parking program and facilitate shared parking4 Improve the employee parking permit program10 Establish an ongoing collection, monitoring, and evaluation process 11 STRATEGY 3: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand Reinvest parking revenues into multimodal improvements6 STRATEGY 4: Simplify and Leverage the Zoning Code Revise the zoning code to better support walkable, mixed-use development in the Coastal Zone 7 STRATEGY 5: Enhance Parking Administration and Operations Strategically invest in public and shared parking supply in key locations 12 STRATEGY 6: Provide Additional Public Parking as Needed 2IBI Group . City of Hermosa Beach / Parking Management Study and Recommended Parking Standards for the Coastal Zone 248 Zone 1 Walk Street – North End 0 500 1,000250Feet° Zone 1 Boundary Metered Street Parking Hermosa Beach City Boundary North End Character Area Walk Street Character Area Quick Facts On-street parking types: Metered Off-street parking types: None Observed on-street occupancy: Below practical occupancy during weekdays, above practical occupancy during the weekend afternoon at 91%. Observed off-street occupancy: None Existing land use types: Residential, Commercial Challenges: High parking occupancy on weekends can limit access to the walk street area/beach. Future vision: Maintain high quality pedestrian connections through the walk streets for access to residential and neighborhood-scale commercial services. Recommendations STRATEGY: Strategicially Invest in Information and Technology STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand STRATEGY: Provide Additional Public Parking as Needed Implement a comprehensive parking signage wayfinding system 3 Design and implement a demand-based parking management program 2 Implement an app-based mobile pay system1 STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand Reinvest parking revenues into multimodal improvements6 STRATEGY: Enhance Parking Administration and Operations Enhance event management practices to maximize parking system flexibility and predictability 8 Improve the residential parking permit program9 Improve the employee parking permit program10 Establish an ongoing collection, monitoring, and evaluation process 11 Revise the zoning code to better support walkable, mixed-use development in the Coastal Zone 7 Strategically invest in public and shared parking supply in key locations 12 STRATEGY: Maximize Use of Existing Parking Supply Maximize flexibility of curb space to accommodate rideshare and valet service 5 Pilot a shared parking program and facilitate shared parking4 Hermosa Beach City Boundary Zone 1 Boundary North End Character Area Walk Street Character Area Metered Street Parking Not applicable for this zone Long-Term Improvements Mid-Term Improvements Near-Term Improvements 1,000 Feet7505002500 3 IBI Group . City of Hermosa Beach / Parking Management Study and Recommended Parking Standards for the Coastal Zone 249 Quick Facts On-street parking types: Non-Metered Off-street parking types: None Observed on-street occupancy: Below practical occupancy, ranging from 53% - 82% occupied. Observed off-street occupancy: None Existing land use types: Residential, Commercial Challenges: Regulation of the residential parking permit program is especially important in this zone as it consists primarily of residential uses. Future vision: Maintain neighborhood connectivity and access to nearby commercial services within the compact grid network. STRATEGY: Strategicially Invest in Information and Technology STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand STRATEGY: Provide Additional Public Parking as Needed Implement a comprehensive parking signage wayfinding system 3 Design and implement a demand-based parking management program 2 Implement an app-based mobile pay system1 STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand Reinvest parking revenues into multimodal improvements6 STRATEGY: Enhance Parking Administration and Operations Enhance event management practices to maximize parking system flexibility and predictability 8 Improve the residential parking permit program9 Improve the employee parking permit program10 Establish an ongoing collection, monitoring, and evaluation process 11 Revise the zoning code to better support walkable, mixed-use development in the Coastal Zone 7 Strategically invest in public and shared parking supply in key locations 12 STRATEGY: Maximize Use of Existing Parking Supply Maximize flexibility of curb space to accommodate rideshare and valet service 5 Pilot a shared parking program and facilitate shared parking4 Zone 2 North End East 0 500 1,000250Feet° Zone 2 Boundary Unmetered Street Parking Hermosa Beach City Boundary North End Character AreaRecommendations Hermosa Beach City Boundary Zone 2 Boundary North End Character Area Non-Metered Street Parking Not applicable for this zone Long-Term Improvements Mid-Term Improvements Near-Term Improvements 1,000 Feet7505002500 4IBI Group . City of Hermosa Beach / Parking Management Study and Recommended Parking Standards for the Coastal Zone 250 Quick Facts On-street parking types: Metered Off-street parking types: None Observed on-street occupancy: Below practical occupancy during weekdays, above practical occupancy during the weekday afternoon at 88%. Observed off-street occupancy: None Existing land use types: Residential, Commercial, Restaurant Challenges: High parking occupancy on weekends can limit access to the beach and commercial uses along Hermosa Avenue. Future vision: Maintain high quality pedestrian connections through the walk streets for access to residential and neighborhood- scale commercial services. Enhance multimodal connectivity and access to community parks and the Greenbelt. Maintain an integrated mixture of small-scale apartments and single-family homes. STRATEGY: Strategicially Invest in Information and Technology STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand STRATEGY: Provide Additional Public Parking as Needed STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand Reinvest parking revenues into multimodal improvements6 STRATEGY: Enhance Parking Administration and Operations Enhance event management practices to maximize parking system flexibility and predictability 8 Improve the residential parking permit program9 Improve the employee parking permit program10 Establish an ongoing collection, monitoring, and evaluation process 11 Revise the zoning code to better support walkable, mixed-use development in the Coastal Zone 7 Strategically invest in public and shared parking supply in key locations 12 Zone 3 Walk Street – Sand Section North 0 500 1,000250Feet° Zone 3 Boundary Metered Street Parking Hermosa Beach City Boundary North End Character Area Sand Section Character Area Walk Street Character Area Recommendations Hermosa Beach City Boundary Zone 3 Boundary Sand Section Character Area North End Character Area Walk Street Character Area Metered Street Parking Not applicable for this zone Long-Term Improvements Mid-Term Improvements Near-Term Improvements 1,000 Feet7505002500 5 IBI Group . City of Hermosa Beach / Parking Management Study and Recommended Parking Standards for the Coastal Zone Implement a comprehensive parking signage wayfinding system 3 Design and implement a demand-based parking management program 2 Implement an app-based mobile pay system1 STRATEGY: Maximize Use of Existing Parking Supply Maximize flexibility of curb space to accommodate rideshare and valet service 5 Pilot a shared parking program and facilitate shared parking4 251 Quick Facts On-street parking types: Non-Metered Off-street parking types: None Observed on-street occupancy: Below practical occupancy, ranging from 47% - 83% occupied. Observed off-street occupancy: None Existing land use types: Residential, Open Space, Education Challenges: Access to open space and educational facilities must be balanced with the single-family residential patterns in this zone. Future vision: Enhance multimodal connectivity and access to community parks and the Greenbelt. Preserve the single-family development pattern of the Valley character area that is part of this zone. STRATEGY: Strategicially Invest in Information and Technology STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand STRATEGY: Provide Additional Public Parking as Needed STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand Reinvest parking revenues into multimodal improvements6 STRATEGY: Enhance Parking Administration and Operations Enhance event management practices to maximize parking system flexibility and predictability 8 Improve the residential parking permit program9 Improve the employee parking permit program10 Establish an ongoing collection, monitoring, and evaluation process 11 Revise the zoning code to better support walkable, mixed-use development in the Coastal Zone 7 Strategically invest in public and shared parking supply in key locations 12 Zone 4 Sand Section – Valley 0 500 1,000250Feet° Zone 4 Boundary Unmetered Street Parking Hermosa Beach City Boundary North End Character Area Sand Section Character Area Valley Character Area Recommendations Hermosa Beach City Boundary Zone 4 Boundary Sand Section Character Area North End Character Area Valley Character Area Non-Metered Street Parking Not applicable for this zone Long-Term Improvements Mid-Term Improvements Near-Term Improvements 1,000 Feet7505002500 6IBI Group . City of Hermosa Beach / Parking Management Study and Recommended Parking Standards for the Coastal Zone Implement a comprehensive parking signage wayfinding system 3 Design and implement a demand-based parking management program 2 Implement an app-based mobile pay system1 STRATEGY: Maximize Use of Existing Parking Supply Maximize flexibility of curb space to accommodate rideshare and valet service 5 Pilot a shared parking program and facilitate shared parking4 252 Quick Facts On-street parking types: Metered Off-street parking types: Public, Private Observed on-street occupancy: Below practical occupancy during weekdays, above practical occupancy during the weekday afternoon at 94%. Observed off-street occupancy: Public parking reaches practical occupancy during the afternoons, peaking at 89%. Private parking is below practical occupancy, at 16% on weekend afternoons. Existing land use types: Office/Professional, Commercial, Assembly, Office/Store Challenges: A mix of uses creates high parking demand. Public spaces are mostly occupied while private spaces are underutilized. Future vision: Continue to offer an array of uses for residents and services and maintain the high quality pedestrian environment. STRATEGY: Strategicially Invest in Information and Technology STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand STRATEGY: Provide Additional Public Parking as Needed STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand Reinvest parking revenues into multimodal improvements6 STRATEGY: Enhance Parking Administration and Operations Enhance event management practices to maximize parking system flexibility and predictability 8 Improve the residential parking permit program9 Improve the employee parking permit program10 Establish an ongoing collection, monitoring, and evaluation process 11 Revise the zoning code to better support walkable, mixed-use development in the Coastal Zone 7 Strategically invest in public and shared parking supply in key locations 12 Zone 5 Walk Street – Downtown 0 500 1,000250 Feet° Zone 5 Boundary Metered Street Parking Hermosa Beach City Boundary Downtown Character Area Sand Section Character Area Walk Street Character Area Recommendations Hermosa Beach City Boundary Zone 5 Boundary Sand Section Character Area Downtown Character Area Walk Street Character Area Metered Street Parking Not applicable for this zone Long-Term Improvements Mid-Term Improvements Near-Term Improvements 1,000 Feet7505002500 7 IBI Group . City of Hermosa Beach / Parking Management Study and Recommended Parking Standards for the Coastal Zone Implement a comprehensive parking signage wayfinding system 3 Design and implement a demand-based parking management program 2 Implement an app-based mobile pay system1 STRATEGY: Maximize Use of Existing Parking Supply Maximize flexibility of curb space to accommodate rideshare and valet service 5 Pilot a shared parking program and facilitate shared parking4 253 Quick Facts On-street parking types: Mostly Non-Metered Off-street parking types: Private Observed on-street occupancy: Below practical occupancy, ranging from 68% - 77% occupied. Observed off-street occupancy: Below practical occupancy, peaking at 64% occupied during weekday afternoons, but occupied at just 21% on weekend afternoons. Existing land use types: Commercial, Office/Professional, Office/Store, Medical Office, Residential Challenges: The Civic Center creates high parking demand that must be balanced with the surrounding commercial and residential uses. Future vision: Enhance the streetscape and circulation of all modes and users. Expand the Civic Center facilities to provide consolidated parking to serve commercial uses along Pacific Coast Highway, Downtown, and the surrounding residential neighborhoods. STRATEGY: Strategicially Invest in Information and Technology STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand STRATEGY: Provide Additional Public Parking as Needed STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand Reinvest parking revenues into multimodal improvements6 STRATEGY: Enhance Parking Administration and Operations Enhance event management practices to maximize parking system flexibility and predictability 8 Improve the residential parking permit program9 Improve the employee parking permit program10 Establish an ongoing collection, monitoring, and evaluation process 11 Revise the zoning code to better support walkable, mixed-use development in the Coastal Zone 7 Strategically invest in public and shared parking supply in key locations 12 Zone 6 Sand Section – Civic Center 0 500 1,000250 Feet° Zone 6 Boundary Unmetered Street Parking Metered Street Parking Hermosa Beach City Boundary Civic Center Character Area Downtown Character Area Sand Section Character Area Valley Character Area Recommendations Hermosa Beach City Boundary Zone 6 Boundary Sand Section Character Area Downtown Character Area Civic Center Character Area Valley Character Area Non-Metered Street Parking Metered Street Parking Not applicable for this zone Long-Term Improvements Mid-Term Improvements Near-Term Improvements 1,000 Feet7505002500 8IBI Group . City of Hermosa Beach / Parking Management Study and Recommended Parking Standards for the Coastal Zone Implement a comprehensive parking signage wayfinding system 3 Design and implement a demand-based parking management program 2 Implement an app-based mobile pay system1 STRATEGY: Maximize Use of Existing Parking Supply Maximize flexibility of curb space to accommodate rideshare and valet service 5 Pilot a shared parking program and facilitate shared parking4 254 Quick Facts On-street parking types: Metered Off-street parking types: None Observed on-street occupancy: Below practical occupancy during weekdays, above practical occupancy during weekend afternoons, at 97%. Observed off-street occupancy: None Existing land use types: Residential, Commercial, Restaurant Challenges: High parking occupancy on weekends can limit access to the beach and walk street area. High density residential uses in the Herondo area may create higher parking demand. Future vision: Maintain high quality pedestrian connections through the walk streets for access to residential and commercial services. Protect high density multi-family residential development patterns in the Herondo character area. Improve pedestrian access through the large apartment blocks to the Greenbelt and the beach. STRATEGY: Strategicially Invest in Information and Technology STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand STRATEGY: Provide Additional Public Parking as Needed STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand Reinvest parking revenues into multimodal improvements6 STRATEGY: Enhance Parking Administration and Operations Enhance event management practices to maximize parking system flexibility and predictability 8 Improve the residential parking permit program9 Improve the employee parking permit program10 Establish an ongoing collection, monitoring, and evaluation process 11 Revise the zoning code to better support walkable, mixed-use development in the Coastal Zone 7 Strategically invest in public and shared parking supply in key locations 12 Zone 7 Walk Street – Sand Section – Herondo 0 500 1,000250Feet° Zone 7 Boundary Metered Street Parking Hermosa Beach City Boundary Herondo Character Area Sand Section Character Area Walk Street Character Area Recommendations Hermosa Beach City Boundary Zone 7 Boundary Sand Section Character Area Herondo Character Area Walk Street Character Area Metered Street Parking Not applicable for this zone Long-Term Improvements Mid-Term Improvements Near-Term Improvements 1,000 Feet7505002500 9 IBI Group . City of Hermosa Beach / Parking Management Study and Recommended Parking Standards for the Coastal Zone Implement a comprehensive parking signage wayfinding system 3 Design and implement a demand-based parking management program 2 Implement an app-based mobile pay system1 STRATEGY: Maximize Use of Existing Parking Supply Maximize flexibility of curb space to accommodate rideshare and valet service 5 Pilot a shared parking program and facilitate shared parking4 255 Quick Facts On-street parking types: Non-Metered Off-street parking types: Private Observed on-street occupancy: Below practical occupancy during the weekday afternoon, above practical occupancy during the weekday evening and weekend afternoon, at 100% occupied. Observed off-street occupancy: Below practical occupancy at about 45% during weekdays, above practical occupancy during the weekend afternoon, at 95%. Existing land use types: Light Manufacturing, Service/Repair, Warehouse/Storage, Residential Challenges: Much of the public parking in this zone has no time restriction. Private parking spaces are underutilized during the week. Future vision: Maintain an integrated mixture of small-scale apartments and single-family homes in the Sand Section area. Accommodate a variety of flexible use spaces and creative industries. STRATEGY: Strategicially Invest in Information and Technology STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand STRATEGY: Provide Additional Public Parking as Needed STRATEGY: Improve Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand Reinvest parking revenues into multimodal improvements6 STRATEGY: Enhance Parking Administration and Operations Enhance event management practices to maximize parking system flexibility and predictability 8 Improve the residential parking permit program9 Improve the employee parking permit program10 Establish an ongoing collection, monitoring, and evaluation process 11 Revise the zoning code to better support walkable, mixed-use development in the Coastal Zone 7 Strategically invest in public and shared parking supply in key locations 12 Zone 8 Sand Section – Cypress 0 500 1,000250Feet° Zone 8 Boundary Unmetered Street Parking Hermosa Beach City Boundary Cypress Character Area Herondo Character Area Sand Section Character Area Recommendations Hermosa Beach City Boundary Zone 8 Boundary Herondo Character Area Cypress Character Area Sand Section Character Area Non-Metered Street Parking Not applicable for this zone Long-Term Improvements Mid-Term Improvements Near-Term Improvements 1,000 Feet7505002500 10IBI Group . City of Hermosa Beach / Parking Management Study and Recommended Parking Standards for the Coastal Zone Implement a comprehensive parking signage wayfinding system 3 Design and implement a demand-based parking management program 2 Implement an app-based mobile pay system1 STRATEGY: Maximize Use of Existing Parking Supply Maximize flexibility of curb space to accommodate rideshare and valet service 5 Pilot a shared parking program and facilitate shared parking4 256 IBI Group 18401 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92612 949-833-5588 www.ibigroup.com For more information, please contact: The City of Hermosa Beach Leeanne Singleton 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310-318-0239 lsingleton@hermosabch.org 257 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY City of Hermosa Beach 10.15.19 258 Hello. Thank you for joining us as we evaluate opportunities to improve the availability of parking resources in the Coastal Zone in a manner that balances coastal access requirements with efficient use of the City’s limited land resources and achievement of the City’s economic development and mobility goals. 259 Agenda. Study Purpose, Goals, & Process Inventory & Zone Characteristics Occupancy & Demand Analysis Recommendations & Best Practices Stakeholder + Council Feedback Study Next Steps & Discussion 01 02 03 04 05 06 260 STUDY PURPOSE, GOALS & PROCESS 01 261 STUDY GOALS 3. Expand mobility options and optimize parking availability. 2. Modify parking standards to encourage revitalization and investment in a pedestrian-oriented district. 1. Create a parking system that meets the parking needs and demands of residents, visitors, and employees in an efficient and cost-effective manner. 262 RELEVANT PLANS PLAN Hermosa (2017) •Comprehensive community vision for land uses and mobility •Recognizes diverse and changing mobility trends Beach Access and Parking Study (2015) •Inventory of public parking in the Coastal Zone •Recognizes efficient management can support more convenient access to parking for residents, businesses, customers and beach visitors Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy (2015) •Identified opportunities for revitalization and reinvestment in the City core and includes parking and land use strategies to support reinvestment 263 PROJECT PROCESS WE ARE HERE 264 PARKING INVENTORY & ZONE CHARACTERISTICS 02 265 STUDY AREA •Extent of Coastal Zone •43% of the City’s land area •Residential Parking Permit Area Parking Type Total Inventoried Spaces On-Street Preferential Yellow Metered 1,155 Preferential Silver Metered 327 Preferential Non-Metered 1,662Non-Preferential Yellow Metered 20 Non-Preferential Non-Metered 673 Total 3,837 Public Off-Street (City-Owned) Lot A 130Lot B 37 Lot C 354 Total 521 Private Off-Street Total 348Overall Total 4,706 266 ZONE DEVELOPMENT Zone Total Inventoried Spaces On- Street Off-Street TotalPublicPrivate Zone 1 Walk Street –North End 281 0 0 281 Zone 2 North End East 518 0 0 518 Zone 3 Walk Street –Sand Section North 493 0 0 493 Zone 4 Sand Section –Valley 738 0 0 738 Zone 5 Walk Street –Downtown 513 521 119 1,153 Zone 6 Sand Section –Civic Center 533 0 135 668 Zone 7 Walk Street –Sand Section –Herondo 543 0 0 543 Zone 8 Sand Section -Cypress 218 0 94 312 Total 3,837 521 348 4,706 267 ZONE CHARACTERISTICS 268 EXISTING PARKING PROGRAMS •Parking Fees + Time Limits •Residential Parking Permit Program •Daily Parking Permit Program •Employee Parking Permit Program •Off-Street Parking Requirements 269 PARKING OCCUPANCY & DEMAND ANALYSIS 03 270 OCCUPANCY SUMMARY •Optimal capacity is typically set at an 85% occupancy level. •For on-street parking this equates to roughly one vacant space per blockface. Zone On-Street Parking Types Off-Street Parking Types Observed On-Street Occupancy Observed Off-Street Occupancy Metered Non-metered: Preferential Zone Non-metered: Non- Preferential Zone Public Private Weekday Afternoon Weekday Evening Weekend Afternoon Weekday Afternoon Weekday Evening Weekend Afternoon Zone 1 ✔61%66%91%N/A N/A N/A Zone 2 ✔✔53%62%82%N/A N/A N/A Zone 3 ✔69%73%88%N/A N/A N/A Zone 4 ✔✔47%62%83%N/A N/A N/A Zone 5 ✔✔✔77%84%94%Public: 89% Private: 10% Public: 78% Private: 3% Public: 86% Private: 16% Zone 6 ✔✔✔✔75%68%77%Private: 64%Private: 30%Private: 21% Zone 7 ✔63%79%97%N/A N/A N/A Zone 8 ✔✔✔✔66%86%100%Private: 46%Private: 45%Private: 95% Weekday Afternoon: Tuesday 2-3 PM Weekday Evening: Tuesday 7-8 PM Weekend Afternoon:Saturday 2-3 PM 271 ON-STREET OCCUPANCY SUMMARY Weekend afternoon occupancy rates exceeded optimal capacity in the following zones: •Zone 1: Walk Street –North End (average occupancy of 91%) •Zone 3: Walk Street –Sand Section North (average occupancy of 88%) •Zone 5: Walk Street –Downtown (average occupancy of 94%) •Zone 7: Walk Street –Sand Section –Herondo (average occupancy of 97%) •Zone 8: Sand Section –Cypress (average occupancy of 100%) Weekday evening occupancy only exceeded optimal capacity in Zone 8 (Sand Section –Cypress, occupancy of 86%) All zones, except Zone 6 (Sand Section –Civic Center), experienced the lowest levels of occupancy during the weekday afternoon (average occupancy of 62%). 272 OFF-STREET OCCUPANCY SUMMARY Lots A, B, and C: •For these three public lots, average occupancy among the three observation times are fairly consistent ranging, between 78% and 89%. The lowest occupancy observed was 78% during the weekday evening, suggesting that the public lots have availability while being generally well-utilized. Private off-street parking •Zone 5 (Walk Street –Downtown) registered relatively low (less than 16% at peak) occupancy for the two sites counted. •Zone 6 (Sand Section –Civic Center) exhibited a peak of 64% occupied of off-street private parking during the weekday afternoon •Zone 8 (Sand Section –Cypress) showed a peak of 95% occupied during the weekend afternoon. 273 •Assessment of Required Off-Street Parking Ratios for different land uses. •Use of Overlay District which reduces parking requirements for certain uses in downtown core. •Generally expressed in a ratio of parking space required per square feet of floor area (1/350 sq ft). Commercial / Retail Office / Professional Restaurant Assembly Fast Food Service / Repair Medical Office Light Manufacturing Warehouse / Storage PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS Land Uses Evaluated 274 OFF-STREET PARKING RATE REQUIREMENTS Urban Land Institute Shared Parking Manual: 2nd Edition (ULI) Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation: 4th Edition (ITE) Peer City Codes: 1.Santa Monica 2.Manhattan Beach 3.Redondo Beach 4.Long Beach 5.Huntington Beach 6.Newport Beach 7.Laguna Beach 8.Carlsbad 275 OFF-STREET PARKING RATE REQUIREMENTS Land Use Comparative Demand Rates Anticipated Peak Parking Demand Rate Hermosa Beach Rates Average City Required Rate ITE Demand Rate ULI Shared Parking Demand Rate Hermosa Beach Required Rate Hermosa Beach Observed Demand Commercial / Retail 250 sf 214.1 sf 277.8 sf 247 sf 250 sf 609.7 sf Commercial / Retail (Overlay District)329.2 sf 329.4 sf 427.4 sf 362 sf 333 sf 642.4 sf Office / Professional 287.5 sf 352.1 sf 263.2 sf 301 sf 250 sf N/A Office / Professional (Overlay District) 307.8 sf 541.7 sf 404.9 sf 439 sf 333 sf 413.3 sf Medical Office (Overlay District)181.3 sf 480.8 sf 341.8 sf 335 sf 333 sf 500 sf Restaurant 119.3 sf 181.8 sf 95.2 sf 132 sf 100 sf N/A Restaurant (Overlay District)135 sf 279.7 sf 146.4 sf 187 sf 100 sf 201.4 sf Fast Food 159.4 sf 121.9 sf 66.7 sf 116 sf 50 sf N/A Service / Repair 362.5 sf 444.4 sf No rate 404 sf 1,000 sf N/A Assembly 3.8 seats 2.6 seats 2.5 seats 3 seats 50 sf 378.3 sf Light Manufacturing 537.5 sf 980.4 sf No rate 759 sf 300 sf 785.8 sf Warehousing / Storage 1,187.5 sf 1,960.8 sf No rate 1,574 sf 1,000 sf 1,051.8 sf Expressed as one parking space per ____ sf 276 STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS & BEST PRACTICES 04 277 1.Which of the strategies interest you most? 2.Do you have feedback or concerns about any of the recommendations? 3.Do you think we’ve missed any general areas of recommendations? 4.Do you agree with the relative priorities identified for near and long term solutions? 5.Do you have recommendations on best practices we should be looking at that you’ve seen in other communities that you think work well? DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 278 Recommendat ion Number Recommendation Strategically Invest in Information and Technology 1 Implement an App-Based Mobile Pay System2Design and Implement a Demand-Based Parking Management Program 3 Invest and Implement a Comprehensive Parking Signage and Wayfinding SystemMaximize Use of Existing Parking Supply 4 Pilot a Shared Parking Program and Facilitate Shared Parking 5 Maximize Flexibility of Curb Space to Accommodate Rideshare, Other Modes, and/or Valet ServiceImprove Mobility Options to Reduce Parking Demand6Reinvest Parking Revenues into Multimodal Improvements Simplify and Leverage the Zoning Code 7 Revise the Zoning Code to Better Support Walkable, Mixed-Use Development in the Coastal ZoneEnhance Parking Administration and Operations 8 Enhance Event Management Practices to Maximize Parking System Flexibility and Predictability 9 Improve the Residential Parking Permit Program10Improve Employee Parking Permit Program 11 Establish an Ongoing Collection, Monitoring, and Evaluation ProcessProvide Additional Public Parking as Needed 12 Strategically Invest in New Public and Shared Parking Supply in Key Locations STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS Cost •Level of cost is relatively based against all other recommendations (i.e. constructing a parking structure would have a high cost respective to an employee parking permit program). Level of Difficulty •Level of difficulty is relatively factored against all other recommendations based upon the amount of coordination or space available needed to implement the recommendation. Priority •Priority level is factored against all other recommendations based upon the greatest impact that is in line with the City of Hermosa Beach’s goals. Implementation Timeline •Cost, level of difficulty, and priority were all factors weighted to inform the short-, mid-, or long-term implementation goals for each recommendation. Recommended Zones for Implementation •Recommended zones indicate where the recommendation would be most beneficial for implementation based on the zone’s unique character and observed demand. Relation to Study Goals •Relation to Study Goals details how a recommendation aligns with the goals for the Coastal Zone stated in the Introduction. 279 IMPLEMENT AN APP-BASED MOBILE PAY SYSTEM Cost: Average Level of Difficulty:Average Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals:#2, #3 1 280 DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT A DEMAND-BASED PARKING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Cost: High Level of Difficulty:High Priority: Average Implementation Timeline: Long-Term Zones for Implementation: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 Related Study Goals:#2, #3 2 281 INVEST AND IMPLEMENT IN A COMPREHENSIVE PARKING SIGNAGE & WAYFINDING SYSTEM Cost: Average Level of Difficulty:Average Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Mid-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals:#2, #3 3 282 PILOT A SHARED PARKING PROGRAM AND FACILITATE SHARED PARKING4 Cost: Average Level of Difficulty:Average Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Long-Term Zones for Implementation: 5, 6, 8 Related Study Goals:#2, #3 283 MAXIMIZE FLEXIBILITY OF CURB SPACE TO ACCOMMODATE RIDESHARE AND OTHER MODES5 Cost: Low Level of Difficulty:Average Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: 5, 6 Related Study Goals:#2, #3 284 REINVEST PARKING REVENUES INTO MULTIMODAL IMPROVEMENTS6 Cost: Low Level of Difficulty:Low Priority: Average Implementation Timeline: Mid-Term Zones for Implementation: 5, 6 Related Study Goals:#2, #3 285 REVISE THE ZONING CODE TO BETTER REFLECT URBAN USES AND WALKABLE COMMERCIAL USES 7 Cost: Average Level of Difficulty:Average Priority: Average Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals:#1, #3 286 ENHANCE EVENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO MAXIMIZE PARKING SYSTEM FLEXIBILITY & PREDICTABILITY8 Cost: Low Level of Difficulty:Low Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals:#2, #3 287 IMPROVE THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM9 Cost: Low Level of Difficulty:High Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals:#2, #3 288 IMPROVE THE EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM10 Cost: Low Level of Difficulty:Low Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals:#2, #3 289 ESTABLISH AN ONGOING COLLECTION, MONITORING, AND EVALUATION PROCESS11 Cost: Low Level of Difficulty:Low Priority: High Implementation Timeline: Short-Term Zones for Implementation: All Related Study Goals:#2, #3 290 STRATEGICALLY INVEST IN THE PUBLIC AND SHARED PARKING SUPPLY IN KEY LOCATIONS12 Cost: High Level of Difficulty:High Priority: Low Implementation Timeline: Long-Term Zones for Implementation:5, 6, 8 Related Study Goals:#2 291 292 STAKEHOLDER + COUNCIL FEEDBACK 05 293 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT •Parking + Enforcement Staff •Residents + Businesses In and Outside of the Coastal Zone •Parking + Mobility Professionals •Commercial Real Estate Brokers •Architects/Land Planners •Commercial Property Owners/Developers •Renters Association •School District 294 1.Which of the strategies interest you most? 2.Do you have feedback or concerns about any of the recommendations? 3.Do you think we’ve missed any general areas of recommendations? 4.Do you agree with the relative priorities identified for near and long term solutions? 5.Do you have recommendations on best practices we should be looking at that you’ve seen in other communities that you think work well? DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 295 1 WHICH OF THE STRATEGIES INTEREST YOU MOST? 1 –Mobile Pay Option 2 –Demand-Based Pricing 3 –Signage and Wayfinding 4 –Shared Parking Opportunities 7 –Revisions to Zoning Code 8 –Event Parking Practices 9/10 –Revisions to Residential/Employee Parking Programs 296 2 DO YOU HAVE FEEDBACK OR CONCERNS ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS? o Like the idea of mobile pay as an option for businesses to provide coupons or validation or parking for customers o Bump up the daily rates for commercial use of parking (events, production) based on level of event impact –then put funds back into a parking benefit district o Shared parking opportunities would be great for both business and event uses (has not been previously allowed) o With demand-based pricing options, be sure to consider seasonality in addition to day of week, location, time of day o Opportunity to purchase the employee permit online or by app rather than requiring in-person would be helpful o Some concern about potential of shared parking agreements and logistics of implementing for public parking purposes o Stop using parking standards as a tool to stifle development and renovations. In-lieu fee is too high. 297 3 DO THINK WE’VE MISSED ANY GENERAL AREAS OF RECOMMENDATIONS? o Time Limits –consider adjusting time restrictions for evening hours or off-season hours so that customers can dine without worrying about a ticket at a 2 hr meter o Parking Benefit District -Creation of a district to focus revenue on improvements to downtown area on improvements like an electric shuttle/pedestrian amenities, parklets o Parking Code -Enforcement of existing code requirements which stipulate garages are to be used for parking of vehicles and not storage –leverage can be providing proof in advance of issuing annual parking permits. o Scooter Parking -Find areas for additional scooter/vespa parking 298 4 DO YOU AGREE WITH THE RELATIVE PRIORITIES? General Agreement on Priorities with the following exceptions: o 7 as a high priority o 8 to be considered with updates to special events policy guide o 12 to consider as part of civic center upgrades in long-term 299 5 DO YOU HAVE RECOMMENDATIONS ON BEST PRACTICES FROM OTHER COMMUNITIES? o Manhattan Beach –Extended time limits for evening/dinner hours allow through mobile app for overnight hours o Redondo Beach and West Hollywood –No parking minimums for smaller changes in use or redevelopment of property under certain square footage o Carmel –Central parking at top of district that encourages people to walk through downtown to get to beach o Manhattan Beach –Downtown Shuttle –maybe re-visit/look at a shuttle between the three beach cities o Mammoth Lakes –Downtown Shuttle o Paso Robles –just implemented mobile pay option and uptake and feedback is good from the businesses o Newport Beach –hourly rate escalates the longer you stay during peak periods, also includes no parking minimums o Tustin –Requires proof of garage being available prior to issuing parking permits for districts 300 OTHER TOPICS OF DISCUSSION o Request for more focused stakeholder meetings related to the zoning standards recommendation specifically o More envisioning and planning needed for the future downtown area (decide what it wants to be/look like, etc) o Lack of outdoor dining along Upper Pier creates a “freeway” like atmosphere that funnels everyone down Pier Ave o Would like to see momentum behind these efforts to get some changes implemented o Interest expressed in understanding how the number of employee permits has changed in the last few years as more Uber/Lyft available and as more employees may be living further from Hermosa because they can no longer afford to live nearby o More envisioning and planning needed for the future downtown area (decide what it wants to be/look like, etc) 301 COUNCIL FEEDBACK 1 –Mobile Pay Option 2 –Demand-Based Pricing 3 –Signage and Wayfinding 4 –Shared Parking Opportunities 6 –Parking Revenues into Multimodal Improvements 7 –Revisions to Zoning Code 8 –Event Parking Practices 9/10 –Revisions to Residential /Employee Parking Programs 302 STUDY NEXT STEPS 06 303 •Review/Approval of Study by City Council •Updates to Local Coastal Program Reviewed by Planning Commission and Council •Review by Coastal Commission •Implementation of Strategies NEXT STEPS 304 Questions & Discussion 305 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 19-0681 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Regular Meeting of October 15, 2019 RECEIVE TRI-ANNUAL REPORT FOR ON-SALE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Recommended Action: Receive and file the report for informational purposes. This tri-annual review covers the period from March 1, 2019 to August 31, 2019. Based on the information in the report, no establishment has reached the “Standard Initiating Planning Commission Review.” Background: Since 2017 the tri-annual reviews of on-sale alcoholic beverage establishments includes the two-step process of providing an informational report before scheduling a hearing. The Process and Standards, updated in 2019, is Attachment 1. Changes to the process and reporting for this review, recommended by the Planning Commission, were approved by the City Council in March 2019, and include reporting and conducting the review three times a year. This is the third report in 2019 and covers the prior 6 months. The next report will be presented in February and will cover the period between July and December. The establishments required to prepare food to alcohol ratio reports for the second half of 2019 will be included in that report. Analysis: Police Reports and ABC Activity: The Police Report and ABC Activity are included as Attachment 2, with their current data sheet as Attachment 3 and officer security checks as Attachment 4. The prior report indicated that one establishment, American Junkie, was determined to be in violation of their CUP due to lack of adequate security. The Suspect pled No Contest and was placed on Summary Probation. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/20/2024Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™306 Staff Report REPORT 19-0681 Occupant Load: The threshold to trigger review is one (1). Code Enforcement routinely checks on-sale establishments and did not report occupant load violations during the review period. The presence of Code Enforcement and HBPD efforts has resulted in few warnings being issued. Warnings typically are issued when a place of business appears to or has been counted and confirmed to be close to its posted occupant load. Code Enforcement and Fire Prevention: We are working with the Los Angeles County Fire Department and include their business license inspection report for the first quarter of 2019 as Attachment 5. It indicates approximately 336 businesses were inspected, of which 8 were late night establishments. No violations were reported. (Note: the quarterly report format is standard for LA County Fire.) Statistical Data Relating to Business Checks of Alcohol Serving Establishments March 1, 2019 to August 31, 2019 is contained in Attachment 6, with the last reporting period report as Attachment 7. Code Enforcement/Violation of CUP Conditions: Violations that are both a code violation and a CUP violation are only counted once. Code Enforcement issued four citations during this reporting period. Although many other businesses received warnings, policy is to request compliance prior to issuing a Citation during a single shift. On April 12, and July 13, 2019* Abigaile & Ocean Bar received Administrative Citations for the CUP violation of excessively loud music, audible to the surrounding residential neighborhood. *The citation issued July 13th is being contested via the administrative hearing process. The results of the hearing will be included in the next report. On April 28 2019, Patrick Molloy’s received an Administrative Citation for the CUP violation of changes to the interior layout by adding an elevated stage altering the primary function of business. On August 5, 2019, Slater’s 50 50 was issued an Administrative Citation for the CUP violation of valet parking patrons vehicles in the fire lane on Palm Drive. Businesses required to submit food-to-alcohol sales ratio reports per conditions in their CUPs must continue to do so; failure to do so is counted as part of the CUP review. Waterman’s, 22 Pier Avenue, and Día de Campo, 1238 Hermosa Avenue, are required to submit quarterly reports, which need not be audited. Standing Room, 1320 Hermosa Avenue, must submit quarterly reports audited by a CPA. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/20/2024Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™307 Staff Report REPORT 19-0681 All reports have been received. Based on the “Procedure for Review of On-Sale Alcoholic Beverage Conditional Use Permit” no businesses have reached the “Standard Initiating P.C. Review” based on the “standards that would trigger a referral to the Planning Commission for a CUP review and potentially for a subsequent modification/revocation hearing.” General Plan Consistency: Evaluation of the City’s enforcement and police responses to achieve safety goals is consistent with Goal 5 of the Public Safety Element:High Quality police and fire protection services provided to residents and visitors and the following policies under Goal 5: ·Public Safety 5.1 Crime deterrence.Regularly evaluate the incidence of crime and identify and implement measures to deter crime. ·Public Safety 5.2 High level of response.Achieve optimal utilization of allocated public safety resources and provide desired levels of response, staffing, and protection within the community. ·Public Safety 5.3 Use of technology.Provide and use smart surveillance technology and communication systems to improve crime prevention and inform the community regarding actions to take in case of emergency. ·Public Safety 5.4 Physical design standards.Reduce opportunities for criminal activity through physical design standards and Crime Prevention through Environmental Design principles. ·Public Safety 5.8 Nuisance abatement. Encourage Police Department review of uses which may be characterized historically by high levels of nuisance (noise, nighttime patronage, and/or rates of criminal activity) providing for conditions of control of use to prevent adverse impacts on adjacent residences, schools, religious facilities, and similar “sensitive” uses. Additionally, Goal 2 of the Governance Element speaks to the importance of having the community, including business partners, be active and engaged in the decision-making process. Staff has found that collaboration with the Pier Plaza establishments to address safety concerns and improve access, lighting, and other aesthetics on the Plaza to be an effective partnership. Summary and Recommendations: The data relating to the Semi-Annual Review criteria is summarized below for specific businesses. Process Criteria Statistics for All Businesses (March 1 - August 31, 2019) Criteria Summary of All Businesses Violation of Operating Hours 0 ABC Violations (underage serving, violation of hours, etc. 0 Overcrowding Citation 0 Serious Crime on Premises indicative of Lack of Adequate Security 0 Criminal Citation of Staff while Working/on Premises 0 Noise Citation 1 Outdoor Encroachment Permit Violation 0 Building Code Violation (incl. remodeling without permit) 0 Health Department Violation 0 Sign Ordinance Violation 0 NPDES Violation 0 Violation of any CUP Condition**2** City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/20/2024Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™308 Staff Report REPORT 19-0681 Criteria Summary of All Businesses Violation of Operating Hours 0 ABC Violations (underage serving, violation of hours, etc. 0 Overcrowding Citation 0 Serious Crime on Premises indicative of Lack of Adequate Security 0 Criminal Citation of Staff while Working/on Premises 0 Noise Citation 1 Outdoor Encroachment Permit Violation 0 Building Code Violation (incl. remodeling without permit) 0 Health Department Violation 0 Sign Ordinance Violation 0 NPDES Violation 0 Violation of any CUP Condition**2** *There were no assault reports indicative of lack of proper security ** Most Code violations are also CUP violations and are not counted twice. Attachments: 1.Process and Standards, updated 2019 2.Police/ABC Report for this period 3.Police Statistics for this period 4.Police Officer Checks for this period 5.LACoFD Business License inspection report 6.Code Enforcement Data for this period 7.Code Enforcement Data for last period Respectfully Submitted by: Bob Rollins, Building/Code Enforcement Official Approved: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/20/2024Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™309 Process and Standards for Review of On-Sale Alcoholic Beverage Conditional Use Permits 1) The CUP review process will consist of an administrative review process in which the on-sale establishments’ activities would be reviewed against an established set of criteria three times per year. 2) On-sale establishments with a CUP would be referred to the Planning Commission for a CUP review, and subsequently for a modification/revocation hearing if the Commission so decided upon its review, when they exceed established standards for each criteria to trigger such a review. 3) The standards that would trigger a referral to the Planning Commission for a CUP review and potential modification/revocation hearing will be based on the frequency or number of incidents/violations within a stipulated timeframe. 4) The standards that would trigger a referral to the Planning Commission for a CUP review and potentially for a subsequent modification/revocation hearing are as indicated in Table 1 below. 5) The administrative review of CUPs should be conducted three times per year with an evaluation of the on-sale establishments’ activities for the prior 6-month period. 6) The standards or criteria of the CUP review system will be made readily available to all on-sale establishments with CUPs and the public via the City website and/or other appropriate media (including direct mailings) to minimize any confusion over what standards will initiate a Planning Commission review and potential modification/revocation hearing. 7) Information from Police and Fire Department related to patterns of patronage of on-sale establishments (as indicated by investigations of intoxicated persons after incidents) and consistency with “Model House Policies” may be generally considered by the Planning Commission as factors in whether the business is being operated responsibly and engaging in the responsible service of alcohol. This information may be considered by the planning commission, as additional justification for holding a CUP review hearing after referral based on the criteria above has been determined and as evidence in any CUP modification/revocation hearing. Table 1. CUP Review Standards Standard Initiating P.C. Review(a) Criterion (Number of incidents in any 6 months) Violation of Operating Hours 2 ABC Violations (underage serving, violation of hours, etc.) 2 Overcrowding Citation 1 Criminal Citation of Staff while Working/on Premises 2 Serious Crime on Premises indicative of Lack of Adequate Security 2 (Combination of any 3 or more) Violation of any CUP Condition (b) ABC Violations (underage service, violation of hours, etc.) Overcrowding Citation Criminal Citation of Staff while Working/on Premises Serious Crime on Premises indicative of Lack of Adequate Security Noise Citation Health Department Violation Outdoor Encroachment Permit Violation Building Code Violation (incl. remodeling without permit) Sign Ordinance Violation NPDES Violation (Administrative Determination) “Excessive Number” of Calls for Police Service “Excessive Number” of Public Complaints to City “Excessive Number” of Criminal Events on/adjacent to Premises NOTE: (a) – Recommended threshold number; Chief of Police may recommend CUP review to Commission at his/her discretion—at any time regardless of number of incidents in any period of time, to determine whether revocation/medication is appropriate under HBMC 17.70.010—as stipulated in many current CUPs and the Municipal Code. (b) Non-submittal of food to alcohol sales ratio reports in a timely manner when required by a CUP is considered a violation of the CUP condition. Reporting of the food to alcohol sales ratio required by a CUP, ABC license, or the Municipal Code may be required and considered during any modification/revocation action. 310 Hermosa Beach Police Department March 2019 - August 2019 CUP Review 1 Police Reports: The Hermosa Beach Police Department (HBPD) conducts a thorough review of all police reports related to establishments which hold an ABC alcohol permit. Each report is typically reviewed individually by more than three people. The review process is initiated by the Crime Analyst, then a review by the Operations Bureau Division Commander (Lieutenant), the Police Captain and ultimately the Chief of Police. The Lieutenant and the Captain make recommendations to the Police Chief regarding their determination of an establishment’s culpability related to Conditional Use Permit (CUP) standards. In addition, the Operations Bureau Division Commander personally makes contact with owners and managers of establishments related to any concern(s) the Police Department may have of issues that do not rise to a CUP violation. The purpose of this communication is to ensure that the establishment hears directly from the Police Department in an effort to address issues before they rise to CUP violations or other potential safety concerns. Police reports are initiated by a Call for Service (CFS). A CFS begins when someone requests the help of the police (typically by a call to dispatch) or if an officer observes an incident/violation/or contacts someone in an enforcement capacity. A CFS may result in a report, citation, arrest, or no action may be taken. HBPD reviews both CFS and police reports related to ABC permitted addresses. It is important to understand that a CFS or a report at a specific address does not mean an incident happened inside the address. As an example, a traffic accident or a fight reported at 1234 Main Street does not mean the incident occurred inside the address or is associated with the business. The address may simply be associated as a landmark (identifying the location of an incident) wherein the location itself had nothing to do with the incident. That said, a location with a CFS or report should not be assumed to be problematic or involved in the incident as the CFS or report may have nothing to do with the location other than used as a landmark/identifying the location of an incident which occurred outside of the location. In reporting back to the Planning Commission, HBPD will note the number of CFS and Reports associated with an address. We also report back the category of the reports (e.g. Drunk, Disturbance, Assault, etc.). An establishment will not have a CUP violation charged against them, unless, in HBPD’s review process it is determined that the establishment was complicit or clearly negligent in its actions which results in a violation of the CUP standards (Table 1.) As an example, two people bump into each other inside of an establishment and one person hits the other person without warning. Without additional information demonstrating the establishment’s complicity or negligence, the establishment would not be charged with a CUP violation. As the Planning Commission reviews HBPD’s statistics related to each location, it should be understood that a location may have 4 “Total” reports, of which only 3 are “reviewed” would mean one of the four reports has nothing to do with the location. The number under the type of report (e.g. Drunk, Disturbance, Assault, etc.), may or may not be charged against the establishment based on the determination made the HBPD Chief of Police. As noted, this determination will be made based on information demonstrating the establishment’s complicity or negligence. If it is determined that an establishment is complicit or negligent, a number will be assigned to the “Counted for CUP” column. 311 Hermosa Beach Police Department March 2019 - August 2019 CUP Review 2 For context, the HBPD and the FBI categorizes assaults, sexual assaults and narcotics violations as ‘serious crime.” With this in mind and with the agreement of the Planning Commission, it has been determined that two (2) incidents of “Serious Crime on Premises Indicative of Lack of Adequate Security” is the established criteria needed for the Chief of Police to request a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) review by the Planning Commission (as noted on Table 1 of the CUP review standards). That said, the municipal code also provides: “the Chief of Police retains authority to recommend CUP reviews to the Planning Commission at his/her discretion— regardless of the number of incidents in any period of time, as stipulated in many current CUPs and the Municipal Code. Between 03/01/19 and 08/31/2019, 28 police reports and 51 CFS related to establishments with CUPs merited review by police staff. Both Abigails (16 noise complaints/3 citations issued by Hermosa Beach Code Enforcement) and Tower 12 (12 noise complaints) had numerous calls for service for noise complaints. See attached 2019 March-August CUP 6 Month Review Chart. In our prior report, it was determined that one (1) incident occurring at American Junkie was in violation of the CUP Review Standards or rose to the level of a serious crime indicative of lack of adequate security. This case has been criminally prosecuted and is closed. The suspect pled No Contest and was placed on Summary Probation. Reports CFS* Total Reviewed Drunk in Public Disturbances Assaults Sexual Assaults Narcotics Other Reports Total Review Disturbance or Assault CUP Violations 28 3 1 12 2 0 10 51 44 0 *CFS- Calls for Service ABC Activity: The Hermosa Beach Police Department participates in a tri-city (Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach and El Segundo) grant with Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) in which this grant ended on June 30, 2019. The tri-cities did not receive a new ABC grant for this fiscal year. We will be re-applying for future grants. This grant provided funding for officers from each agency to work together to impact alcohol related issues in each city. While this program is primarily enforcement related, there is an educational component where police and ABC personnel meet with the staff/ownership at on-site and off-site sales establishments to review expectations and provide guidance. Below is a recap of the police department’s efforts for the months of March 2019 through August 2019:  March 9, 2019 Minor Decoy Operation – No citations  May 17, 2019 Minor Decoy Operation – 16 establishments visited – No violations 312 Hermosa Beach Police Department March 2019 - August 2019 CUP Review 3  June 7, 2019 Shoulder Tap Operation – 2 cited for providing alcohol to a minor  June 28, 2019 Trap Door Operation – 2 cited for fake identification Update to Prior ABC Activities: May’s Gas Station and Minimart was cited in January of 2019 and ABC has fined this locaiton. The Green Store was cited in September of 2019 and ABC has fined this location. Responsible Beveraverage Service Training: On July 23, 2019 Behavioral Health Services provided RBS training in Hermosa Beach and had 30 attendees from local Hermosa Beach establishments. Definitions: IMPACT (Informed Merchants Preventing Alcohol-Related Crime Tendencies) Inspection- objective of the project is to educate licensees about the various ways they can participate in reducing alcohol-related crimes such as sales to underage and obviously intoxicated persons. Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Training- A free, voluntary prevention and education program for retail licensees, their employees and applicants, designed to promote the legal and responsible sale and service of alcoholic beverages in California. Minor Decoy- This operation allows law enforcement to use persons under 20 years of age as decoys to test establishments ID check process to determine if they will sell alcohol to minors. Party Patrol Enforcement- This operation focuses on under aged alcohol related parties. Responsible Beverage Service (RBS) Training- (Similar to LEAD Training) Free alcohol beverage service training provided by Behavioral Health Services (BHS) to sellers/servers designed to promote the legal and responsible sale and service of alcoholic beverages in California. Responsible Beverage Service (RBS) Training- Similar to LEAD training, this free training is provided by the Behavioral Health Services. Shoulder Tap- During these operations, a minor decoy, under the direct supervision of law enforcement officers, solicits adults outside ABC licensed establishments to buy the minor decoy alcohol. Trap Door- During these operations, law enforcement works with establishments to interview and cite minors who have attempted to gain access to an establishment using a false ID. 313 Hermosa Beach Police Department March 2019 - August 2019 CUP Review 4 DUI and Drunk in Public Summary: As part of DUI and Drunk in Public arrests, HBPD officers, to the best of their abilities, ask arrestees to tell them where they have previously been drinking, and more specifically the last place they recall drinking. Not all contacts with arrestees provide an opportunity to ask these questions. The answers are documented and are presented here. March 2019 - August 2019 DUI Summary March 2019 - August 2019 Public Intoxication Summary Location Totals Location Totals American Junkie 3 American Junkie 3 Bars 1 AVP 1 Beach 1 Bars 3 Chelseas 1 Beach / Plaza 2 Other Cities 16 Dia De Campo 1 Crafty Minds 1 Hermosa Saloon 1 Hermosa 2 Lighthouse 2 Beer Garden 1 Other City 5 Residence 1 Patrick Molloys 2 Lighthouse 1 Residence 1 Rebel Republic 1 Sea Sprite 1 Sharkeez 6 Sharkeez 8 Tower 12 1 Slaters 2 Unknown 5 Tower 12 3 Totals 41 Unknown 44 Vehicle 1 Totals 80 314 Total ## Reviewed Drunk in Public Disturbance / Fights Assaults Sexual Assaults Narcotics Other Reports # Reviewed Disburbance / Assault Abigaile's, 1301 Manhattan Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 15 0 American Junkie, 68 Pier 8 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 5 4 0 Baja Sharkeez, 52 Pier 5 4 0 0 1 1 0 2 4 3 0 Chelsea 1340 Hermosa Ave.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Chipotle Mexican Grill, 1439 PCH 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Comedy & Magic, 1018 Hermosa Ave 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 The Deck, 1272 The Strand 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 El Pollo Inka, 1100 PCH 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Good Stuff 1286 The Strand 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hennessey's Tavern, 8 Pier Plaza 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 Hermosa Saloon, 211 PCH 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Laurel Tavern, 1220 Hermosa Ave.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Lighthouse, 30 Pier Plaza 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 North End Bar, 2626 Hermosa Ave 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paisano's, 1132 Hermosa Ave 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 Patrick Malloy's, 50 Pier Plaza 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 Pedone's Pizza, 1332 Hermosa Ave 4 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 Poulet Du Jour, 233 PCH 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Saint Rocke, 142 PCH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Scotty's, 1100 The Strand 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Slaters 50/50 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 The Spot, 110 2nd St 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Steak & Whiskey, 117 Pier Ave.1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tower 12, 53 Pier Plaza 6 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 10 10 0 Uncle Stavros Café, 201 Hermosa Ave 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Watermans, 22 Pier Plaza 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Totals 54 30 4 2 12 2 0 10 52 45 0 2019 March - August CUP 6 Month Review Reports CFS Counted for CUP 315 Total # # Review Drunk in Public Dist. / Fights Assaults Sexual Assaults Narcotics Other Reports # Review Dist. / Assault Abigaile's (Ocean/Alta House), 1301 Manhattan Avenue American Junkie, 68 Pier Plaza Baja Sharkeez, 52 Pier Plaza Banzai Beach, 934 Hermosa Ave. Barnacles, 837 Hermosa Ave Beach House, 1300 The Strand California Sushi & Teriyaki, 429 PCH Comedy & Magic, 1018 Hermosa Ave Hennessey's Tavern, 8 Pier Plaza Hermosa Pub, 1314 Hermosa Ave. Hot's Kitchen Lighthouse, 30 Pier Plaza Paisano's, 1132 Hermosa Ave Patrick Malloy's, 50 Pier Plaza Pedone's Pizza, 1332 Hermosa Ave Playa Hermosa, 19 Pier Ave. Saint Rocke, 142 Pacific Coast Hwy The Standing Room, 1320 Hermosa Ave Tower 12, 53 Pier Plaza Uncorked, 302 Pier Ave The Underground, 1334 Hermosa Ave Watermans, 22 Pier Plaza Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Violation of Operating Hours 2018 January - April CUP Report Reports CFS Counted for CUP Violation of any CUP Condition ABC Violations (underage serving, violation of hours, etc) Overcrowding Citation Criminal Citation of Staff while Working/On premises Serious Crime on Premises indicative of Lack of Adequate Security Noise Citation Health Department Violation Outdoor Encroachment Permit Violation 316 "Excessive Number" of Calls for Police Service "Excessive Number" of Public Complaints to City "Excessive Number" of Criminal Events on/adjacent to Premises Building Code Violation (incl. remodeling w/o permit) Sign Ordinance Violation 317 SECCHK for Businesses with Alcohol Licenses March 1st, 2019-August 31st, 2019 ABIGAILE'S 1301 Manhattan Ave. 2 AKBAR CUISINE OF INDIA 1101 Aviation Bl. 3 AMERICAN JUNKIE - 68 Pier Pz. 28 BAJA SHARKEEZ 52 Pier Pz. 31 BARNACLES 837 Hermosa Ave. 11 BEACH HOUSE 1300 The Strand 2 COMEDY & MAGIC CLUB 1018 Hermosa Ave. 8 HENNESSEY'S TAVERN 8 Pier Pz. 18 HERMOSA BEACH YACHT CLUB 66 Hermosa Ave. 1 HERMOSA SALOON 211 Pacific Coasy Hwy. 12 LIGHTHOUSE 30 Pier Pz. 21 NORTH END 2626 Hermosa Ave. 23 PALMILLA 39 Pier Pz. 3 PATRICK MOLLOY'S 50 PIER PZ. 19 SABRA BEIRUT MIX 500 Pacific Coast Hwy. 1 SAINT ROCKE 142 Pacific Coast Hwy. 9 SCOTTY'S 1100 The Strand 1 SLATERS 50/50 11 Pier Pz. 3 STEAK & WHISKY 117 Pier Ave. 1 SUZY'S 1141 Aviation Bl. 12 TOWER 12 53 Pier Pz. 25 THE UNDERGROUND 1334 Hermosa Ave 33 WATERMANS 22 Pier Pz. 24 Totals 291 9/19/2019 Page 1 of 1 P:\Crystal Reports\SECCHK for bars.rpt 318 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 178781 APARTMENTS- 131 10TH 131 10TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177750 LEE APARTMENTS 20 10TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177574 GROSSO APARTMENTS 36 10TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177480 DROMY INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS 59 10TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178043 SEA VILLA 65 10TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177610 HERMOSA BEACH R.V. COURT 731 10TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178040 SEA SKIFF APARTMENTS 150 10TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177351 BROTHER'S BURRITOS 24 11TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178109 ST. FRANCIS HOTEL (24 - 11TH STREET, LLC 24 11TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177835 MONTEREY APARTMENTS 432 11TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177629 HERMOSA SELF-STORAGE 552 11TH PL HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177657 HOWELL APARTMENTS 563 11TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177616 HERMOSA CYCLERY 20 13TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178052 SHARKEEZ CORPORATE OFFICE 36 13TH CT HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177728 LA PLAYITA RESTAURANT 37 14TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177567 GRANDVIEW INN 55 14TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 1 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 319 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 178222 VACANT 87 14TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 VACANT BIENNIAL 177913 PACIFICO CONDOS 15 15TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177165 15TH STREET PROPERTIES 49 15TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178330 WARREN APARTMENTS 56 15TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178321 VILLA DEL SOL 77 15TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177286 BARRON APARTMENTS 840 15TH PL HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177982 RASMUSSEN APARTMENT 89 15TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177763 LION APARTMENTS 85 16TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177858 NELSON BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION 86 16TH CT HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177716 KISSEL APARTMENTS 91 16TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177252 APARTMENTS 75 18TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178358 XANKO LLC APARTMENTS 124 19TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178108 ST. CROSS CHURCH APARTMENTS 302 19TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177767 LOFTIN APARTMENTS 71 19TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178003 ROHRBACH APARTMENTS 1257 1ST ST 4 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177473 DORNBLASER APARTMENTS 172 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 2 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 320 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 177421 CONDOS 540 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177411 APT COMPLEX 592 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177242 APARTMENT COMPLEX 600 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177530 FIRST PLACE OWNERS ASSOCIATION 601 1ST PL HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177176 636 1ST PL APARTMENTS 636 1ST PL HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177772 LUCAS APARTMENTS 639 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177177 APARTMENT BUILDING 645 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177648 HOLLYWOOD REGENCY APARTMENTS 653 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177346 BRICKER APARTMENTS 700 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178138 SURFSIDE CONDOS 846 1ST ST 834-846 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177410 CONDO COMPLEX 926 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177828 MITCHELL APARTMENTS 930 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177257 APARTMENTS/CONDOS COMPLEX 936 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177238 APARTMENT COMPLEX 940 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177864 NOBLE APARTMENTS 950 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177642 HICKS APARTMENTS 957 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 3 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 321 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 177368 CARIKER HERMOSA VIEW APARTMENTS 962 1ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178500 BROWN APPARTMENTS 1026 21ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 08/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177212 AGAJANIAN-SAEMANN APARTMENTS 718 21ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 08/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178314 VARGAS APARTMENTS 720 21ST ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 08/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177793 MARTHA'S 22ND STREET GRILL* 25 22ND ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177336 BOTTLE INN RESTAURANT 26 22ND ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177241 APARTMENT COMPLEX 740 24TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 08/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178345 WHISTLER APARTMENTS 743 24TH PL HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 08/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177935 PENTAGRAM POINT APARTMENTS 137 27TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177954 APARTMENTS 131 28TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 08/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177335 APARTMENTS 207 28TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 08/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178104 SPOT, THE 110 2ND ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177314 BEAVERS INC. APARTMENTS 563 2ND ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177888 OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 620 2ND ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178218 APARTMENTS 727 2ND ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 08/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178302 VACANT OCCUPANCY 727 2ND ST 107 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS BIENNIAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 4 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 322 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 177311 APARTMENTS 140 30TH ST 138-140 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 08/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177562 GOLDSTEIN - WOLF APARTMENTS 126 33RD ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177552 GASTELUM APARTMENTS 110 34TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177801 MC KINLEY APARTMENTS 630 3RD ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177178 APARTMENT BUILDING 645 3RD ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177460 DIAMOND APARTMENTS 656 3RD ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177188 SEACREST CONDOS 709 3RD ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177182 3RD ST APARTMENTS 710 3RD ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177465 DOMENO APARTMENTS 720 3RD ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177342 BRAMASOLE 1046 4TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177243 APARTMENT COMPLEX- 4TH ST 306 4TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177186 4TH STREET CONDO HOMES 33 4TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178347 WHITE PROPERTIES 639 4TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177453 DECANIO APARTMENTS 659 4TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177244 APARTMENT COMPLEX 4TH ST. 664 4TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177846 MP CORE, LLC 668 4TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 5 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 323 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 178035 SATTLER APARTMENTS 669 4TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177179 682 4TH STREET LLC 682 4TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177413 CONDOMINIUMS 701 4TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178242 APARTMENTS 703 4TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177239 APARTMENT COMPLEX 718 4TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178073 SMITH RENTALS 726 4TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178065 SINER/PETRILL APARTMENTS 638 5TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 05/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178672 TURK / BURSON APARTMENTS 223 6TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177777 MAHAMUDRA KADAMPA BUDDHIST CENTER 500 6TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177299 BEACH CITIES SELF STORAGE 530 6TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178058 SHELDON APARTMENTS 17 7TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178247 APARTMENT COMPLEX 40 7TH CT HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 0 01/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177191 7TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH LLC 906 7TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177941 PHAM APARTMENTS 831 8TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 0 01/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177905 PACIFIC BEACH PROPERTIES 732 9TH ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/01/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177546 SANDLER PARTNERS 1200 ARTESIA BLVD 300 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 6 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 324 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 177278 YOGA STUDIO 1200 ARTESIA BLVD 100 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 CLOSED ANNUAL 178292 VACANT OCCUPANCY 950 ARTESIA BLVD HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 VACANT BIENNIAL 178211 VACANT 966 ARTESIA BLVD HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 VACANT BIENNIAL 178154 THE CHICKEN SHACK 1030 AVIATION BLVD HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177372 CARPET SPECTRUM 1050 AVIATION BLVD HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178085 AMERICAN BOARD OF PODIATRIC MEDICINE 1060 AVIATION BLVD 100 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177845 VACANT 914 AVIATION HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 VACANT BIENNIAL 177874 OCEAN DINER 959 AVIATION BLVD HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177419 CONDOS 803 BARD ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 0 01/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177352 APARTMENT COMPLEX 1136 CYPRESS AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 01/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177908 PATRICK KEALY CONSTRUCTION 513 CYPRESS AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177318 Benz Air Engineering Co.531 Cypress AVE Hermosa Beach,CA 90254 0 02/21/2019 CLOSED 177989 RESIN ART GALLERY 618 CYPRESS AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177678 J.B. PLUMBING INC.620 CYPRESS AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178295 STUDIO 637 637 CYPRESS AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177281 MANGIAGLI CUSTOM GLASSING 640 CYPRESS HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 7 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 325 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 177434 CROSSFIT HORSEPOWER 725 CYPRESS AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177554 APARTMENTS 851 CYPRESS AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 0 01/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177326 GOOD PR 1001 HERMOSA AVE 203 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177673 INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE 1001 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177708 KELLEY INSURANCE SERVICES 1001 HERMOSA AVE 201 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177665 PACIFIC ATLANTIC REACT 1001 HERMOSA AVE 202 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178168 THE RUDOW GROUP, INC.1001 HERMOSA AVE 207 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177818 MICKEY'S LIQUOR & DELI 101 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177406 COMEDY & MAGIC CLUB 1018 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177330 CRAFTY MINDS 1031 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177323 BLISS FAMILY TRUST APTS 104 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177670 INSKEEP APARTMENTS 110 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177960 POKE BAR 1120 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177813 MICHELLE'S 1128 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177916 PAISANOS PIZZA & PASTA 1132 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177271 HERMOSA GIRL 1134 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 PASS BIENNIAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 8 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 326 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 178153 HERMOSA GIRL 1136 HERMOSA AVE A HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178128 HERMOSA GIRL 1138 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177477 DOUGLASS MANOR - APARTMENTS 114 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177181 2ND STREET LAUNDRY 117 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178005 ROK SUSHI KITCHEN 1200 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178096 VACANT 1216 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 VACANT ANNUAL 177549 LAUREL TAVERN 1220 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178773 BIJOUX BUILDING 1221 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177377 CHASE BANK 1221 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177541 NORTH SHORE POKE 1227 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 VACANT BIENNIAL 177459 DIA DE CAMPO 1238 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177322 BIONIC BODY 1244 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 VACANT ANNUAL 177353 PARKING GARAGE 1301 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178774 1303 HERMOSA AVE LLC 1303 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177922 PARADISE ICE CREAM 1309 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177934 PENNINSULA ESCROW 1311 HERMOSA AVE 300 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS BIENNIAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 9 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 327 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 178110 SUPERVISION 1311 HERMOSA AVE 200 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177624 OUTPOST 406 1314 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178173 THE STANDING ROOM 1320 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177306 BEACH MARKET, INC.1325 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 179883 DECADENCE 1332 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 0 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177931 PEDONE'S PIZZA & FINE FOODS 1332 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178204 UNDERGROUND PUB & GRILL 1332 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177343 HERMOSA BREWING COMPANY 1342 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177304 BEACH HOUSE APARTMENTS 1400 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178294 VACANT OCCUPANCY 1405 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 VACANT BIENNIAL 178223 VACANT OCCUPANCY 1407 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178306 VACANT 1409 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178290 VACANT OCCUPANCY 1411 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178254 VACANT OCCUPANCY 1423 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177659 HWANG APARTMENTS 150 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177210 LILAC & LEMON 1503 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/02/2019 PASS BIENNIAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 10 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 328 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 178192 APARTMENTS 156 HERMOSA AVE 156-164 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177423 CONROY APTS.16 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177984 RASSMUSSEN APARTMENTS 1644 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177727 SERVE ON 2ND 170 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177553 GASTELUM APTS 1800 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177628 HERMOSA SEAGULL LLC 1816 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177633 HERMOSA SOUTHWINDS 1830 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178147 SERVE ON 2ND 190 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177855 PUEBLO APARTMENTS 1912 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177211 AGAJANIAN APARTMENTS 1917 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178064 SIMONS APARTMENTS 2 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178351 WILCOX APARTMENTS 2021 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177942 PHILLIP'S PROPERTIES 2100 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177776 MAHAJAN APARTMENTS 2112 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177405 COMAFORD APARTMENTS 2147 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178158 THE GREEN STORE 2151 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/02/2019 PASS BIENNIAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 11 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 329 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 177900 P A PARTNERSHIP 216 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177470 DONJAC PROPERTIES #2 LLC 220 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177428 COURTNEY APARTMENTS 2200 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177693 JOHN DUGAN APARTMENTS 2231 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177497 EL GRINGO 2620 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177867 NORTH END BAR & GRILL 2626 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178136 SURF AND SAND VILLAS 2640 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178688 ICAZA APARTMENTS 2644 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177370 CARLTON APTS 701 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177475 DOTT CORPORATION 810 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 05/30/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177294 BEACH BODIES 822 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 06/05/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178304 HERMOSA MEXICAN REST.824 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 06/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177265 ASHLEY'S DELI & MARKET INC. 828 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 06/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177450 UNITA 832 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 03/07/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177285 BARNACLES BAR AND GRILL 837 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177655 VACANT 844 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 06/21/2019 VACANT ANNUAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 12 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 330 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 177764 VACANT 910 HERMOSA AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 06/21/2019 VACANT ANNUAL 177235 ANGEL HAIR & NAILS 934 HERMOSA AVE 4 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 06/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177512 EVOLUTION SALON H.B.934 HERMOSA AVE 6 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178111 STARBUCKS COFFEE 1305 HERMOSA AVE AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/02/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178103 SPOT LIGHT ENTERTAINMENT 121 HERONDO ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 CLOSED ANNUAL 177957 PLAYA PACIFICA APARTMENTS 415 HERONDO ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 06/05/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177310 BEACHSIDE CONDOS 447 HERONDO ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177563 GONNOUD APARTMENTS 1132 LOMA DR HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177590 HAYES & WELCH APARTMENTS 1436 LOMA DR HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177998 ROBERT P. FARIES APARTMENTS 1502 LOMA DR HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177726 LA PENITA II 200 LONGFELLOW AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177870 O K CORRAL PRESCHOOL 739 LONGFELLOW AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177203 ABIGAILES 1301 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177798 MARLIN EQUITY 1301 MANHATTAN AVE C HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/02/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178020 SAILFISH HOLDINGS - C/O MARLIN EQUITY 1301 MANHATTAN AVE D HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/02/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177258 APPLEGATE APTS 1534 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 06/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 13 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 331 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 179047 FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST 1547 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 CLOSED ANNUAL 177420 CONDOS 162 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 06/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177630 HERMOSA SHORES APTS 1717 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 06/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177167 1745 MANHATTAN AVENUE, LLC 1745 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/02/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177416 CONDOS 226 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 06/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178268 CONDOS 230 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 06/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177733 LANSING APTS 2611 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 06/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177305 BEACH MAIL BOX 2629 MANHATTAN AVE B HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177615 HERMOSA CLEANERS 2629 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177783 MANHATTAN MART 2641 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177730 VACANT 2700 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177331 BOCCATO'S GROCERIES 3127 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/02/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177881 O'CONNOR PROPERTY 3201 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/08/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178087 OCONNOR PROPERTIES 3201 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177780 MANHATTAN BEACH KARATE & YOGA OFFICE 3207 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/20/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177702 KAREN WITTICH DESIGNS 3209 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/02/2019 PASS BIENNIAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 14 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 332 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 177226 BROTHER'S BURRITOS 3216 MANHATTAN AVE B HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177387 CHUG SALON 3217 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/20/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178206 UNLIMITED FITNESS 3219 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/20/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177640 HERTEL APARTMENTS 3302 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177495 APPRARMENTS 841 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177979 APPARTMENTS 907 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177892 OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE PRESCHOOL 340 MASSEY ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 01/02/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177461 DIMITRIUS APARTMENTS 101 MONTEREY BLVD HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177653 HORN APARTMENTS- 1123- 1127 MONT. 1123 MONTEREY BLVD HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177751 LENZ APARTMENTS 1137 MONTEREY BLVD HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177991 THE REAL ESTATE STORE 1328 MONTEREY BLVD HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 CLOSED ANNUAL 177589 HAYES & WELCH APARTMENTS 1428 MONTEREY BLVD HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177240 APARTMENT COMPLEX 1536 MONTEREY BLVD HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177646 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS & SUITES 125 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177382 CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL 1286 1439 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/02/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178340 WELLS FARGO BANK 1501 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/02/2019 PASS BIENNIAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 15 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 333 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 177631 HERMOSA SMILES DENTISTRY 1559 PACIFIC COAST HWY 101 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/20/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177720 KRISER'S NATURAL PET STORE 1559 PACIFIC COAST HWY 103 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177850 NAIL GARDEN 1559 PACIFIC COAST HWY 105 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178496 PLAZA HERMOSA BUILDING COMPLEX 1559 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/03/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177172 24 HOUR FITNESS 1601 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177634 MGR. CO. CONCEPT SEVEN, LLC 1707 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177525 FENG APARTMENTS 1731 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 05/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177903 1803 APARTMENTS 1803 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177170 2121 PCH, LLC 2121 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178226 AMIRIAN HOME 219 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/03/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177978 R P & ASSOCIATES INC.2205 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177507 ERICA GIERMAN M F T 2309 PACIFIC COAST HWY 103 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177815 MICHAEL COLLINS 2309 PACIFIC COAST HWY 207 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177816 MICHAEL HUFFMAN & ASSOC. 2309 PACIFIC COAST HWY 105 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178180 THRIVENT FINANCIAL 2309 PACIFIC COAST HWY 107 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177196 A HEALING TOUCH BY LILIN 2401 PACIFIC COAST HWY 109 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS BIENNIAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 16 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 334 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 177498 EL GRINGO MANAGEMENT 2401 PACIFIC COAST HWY 206 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177883 HOLLYWOOD ESCROW 2401 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177344 PATRIC WHITE 2401 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178014 ROYA ARBAB DDS 2401 PACIFIC COAST HWY 205 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178118 STATE FARM INSURANCE 2401 PACIFIC COAST HWY 201 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178123 STONE FOX SWIM WEAR 2401 PACIFIC COAST HWY 108 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/16/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177173 2447 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, LLC 2447 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178681 FIRSTSTEPS FOR KIDS 2447 PACIFIC COAST HWY 111 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177740 MCLACHLAN LAW 2447 PACIFIC COAST HWY 100 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/03/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177987 REGUS MANAGEMENT 2447 PACIFIC COAST HWY 200 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178106 SPYDERBOARDS 2461 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/03/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177654 HOTEL HERMOSA 2515 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178682 OCEAN POINT BUILDING COMPLEX 2601 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/03/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178002 RODGERS, JOHN ATTY. AT LAW 2601 PACIFIC COAST HWY 300-302 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177360 CONCIERGE ESCROW 2615 PACIFIC COAST HWY 215-216 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177493 EDWARD JONES INV.2615 PACIFIC COAST HWY 223 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 17 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 335 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 177501 ELWOOD CAPITAL GROUP 2615 PACIFIC COAST HWY 100 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177492 FREEMAN MATHIS & GARY 2615 PACIFIC COAST HWY 300-301 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177672 INTENSIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION CONSULTANTS (IBIC) 2615 PACIFIC COAST HWY 105 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178683 PACIFIC PHYSICAL THERAPY 2615 PACIFIC COAST HWY 321 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177697 SHAUNA LETVIN LCSW 2615 PACIFIC COAST HWY 327 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178081 SOUSA & WEBER LLP 2615 PACIFIC COAST HWY 224 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178119 STATE FARM INSURANCE 2615 PACIFIC COAST HWY 221 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178690 DOMAIN DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2699 PACIFIC COAST HWY 201 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177267 VACANT 2699 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177827 VACANT 2699 PACIFIC COAST HWY 101 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 VACANT BIENNIAL 178126 DUNN EDWARDS PAINT 2775 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/03/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177955 GAME READY 307 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 3 01/10/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177561 SKECHERS 3201 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177569 SKECHERS 3201 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178097 SKECHERS 3201 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178091 SOUTH BAY JIU JITSU 325 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/09/2019 PASS BIENNIAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 18 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 336 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 178010 ROTH & ASSOCIATES 329 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/09/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177183 3RD STREET TATTOO 331 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177543 FURNISHED 333 PACIFIC COAST HWY HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/07/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178120 VACANT 845 PALM AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 2 02/21/2019 VACANT ANNUAL 177811 SLATER 50/50 11 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/03/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177970 PSYCHIC READINGS BY MICHELLE 127 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177863 POWER REALTY 131 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177292 BEACH & BEVERLY 135 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/09/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178131 SUN POINT REALTY 145 PIER AVE B HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/09/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178348 WICKED GROUP LLC 145 PIER AVE A HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/09/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177316 BEHAVIOR RESOURCES, INC. 155 PIER AVE B HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/09/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177663 I-ACT 155 PIER AVE A HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/09/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177686 JAVA MAN 157 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/09/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 179046 PIER SURF BOARD HOUSE 21 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177295 WAVES 29 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178181 ISTANBUL HOME 31 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS BIENNIAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 19 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 337 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 178150 VACANT 337 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 VACANT ANNUAL 177792 MARLIN EQUITY PARTNERS 338 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/02/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177918 PALMILLA 39 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177790 MARLIN EQUITY 400 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 07/02/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177946 PIER MEDICAL 415 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178001 ROCKEFELLER 418 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178187 SKIN SAVVY MEDICAL SPA 49 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177674 THE BAKED BEAR 49 PIER AVE A HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178363 YER CHEAT'N HEART TATTOO INC. 49 PIER AVE 2F HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178172 THE SOURCE CAFE 509 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177321 BIKRAM YOGA HERMOSA BEACH 518 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178191 TOWER 12 53 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177609 HERMOSA BEACH POLICE 540 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177608 HERMOSA BEACH LIBRARY 550 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177206 ACCUDATA 555 PIER AVE D HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 178066 SKIN MEDIX 555 PIER AVE E HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS BIENNIAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 20 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 338 Record #Occupant Name Street Address City, State, Zip Sector Updated Result Frequency 178105 SPYDER BOARD SHOP 65 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177944 PICK UP STIX #721 703 PIER AVE A HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177409 COMMUNITY CENTER 710 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177809 REBEL REPUBLIC SOCIAL HOUSE 73 PIER AVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178042 SEA SPRITE OCEANFRONT APT. MOTEL 1016 THE STRAND HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS ANNUAL 178037 SCOTTY'S 1100 THE STRAND HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/10/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177635 HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL 1645 VALLEY DR HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/09/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177604 HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 425 VALLEY DR HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS BIENNIAL 177848 MUSIC FOCUS 671 VALLEY DR HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/09/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177676 J. D. MANUFACTURING COMPANY 675 VALLEY DR HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 08/09/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177682 AQUATECH GLASSING 717 VALLEY DR D2-D3 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177463 DOGHOUSE STUDIOS 717 VALLEY DR B2 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177328 GLASS HOUSE 717 VALLEY DR A2 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177694 JOHNSON FINE WOOD 717 VALLEY DR C2 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177696 JOL DESIGN INCORPORATED 717 VALLEY DR A1 HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL 177603 HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY ST HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254 1 06/20/2019 PASS ANNUAL Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 21 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 339 TOTAL INSPECTIONS: 336 Run Date: 9/5/2019 10:31:52 AM Page 22 of 22 Fire Station/Fire Prevention Unit Inspections FIRE STATION 100 (Sector: All) (Frequency: All) 340 C o d e E n f o r c e m e n t C U P R e v i e w March 1 – August 31, 2019 Statistical Data Relating to Business Checks of Alcohol Serving Establishments: Total Establishment Checks (6 month period) 4279 Average Total Checks Per Month 728 Average Total Checks Per Shift 38 Average Checks Per Establishment Per Month 40 *These checks are for: occupancy load, fire exits, floorplans, live entertainment, and overall condition. Business Name Total Checks Mar – Aug 2019 North End Bar 135 Abaigailes / Ocean Bar 246 Saint Rocke 130 Hermosa Saloon 130 Slater 50/50 189 Hennessey’s Tavern 189 Silvio’s 137 Waterman’s HB 184 The Lighthouse 189 Palmilla 189 Patrick Molloy’s 241 Baja Sharkeez 238 Tower 12 238 American Junkie 238 The Deck 242 Barnacles 135 Serve on 2nd 82 Laurel Tavern 130 Dia De Campo 130 The Standing Room 146 Underground 238 Chelsea 238 Rebel Republic 142 Suzy’s 123 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3884 341 C o d e E n f o r c e m e n t C U P R e v i e w November 2018 – April 2019 Statistical Data Relating to Business Checks of Alcohol Serving Establishments: Total Establishment Checks (6 month period) 4569 Average Total Checks Per Month 759 Average Total Checks Per Shift 36 Average Checks Per Establishment Per Month 31 *These checks are for: occupancy load, fire exits, floorplans, live entertainment, and overall condition. Business Name Total Checks Nov – Apr North End Bar 148 Alta House / Ocean Bar 172 Saint Rocke 143 Hermosa Saloon 143 Slater 50/50 166 Hennessey’s Tavern 159 Silvio’s 194 Waterman’s HB 204 The Lighthouse 233 Palmilla 213 Patrick Molloy’s 231 Baja Sharkeez 239 Tower 12 237 American Junkie 245 The Deck 201 Barnacles 147 Serve on 2nd 102 Laurel Tavern 194 Dia De Campo 194 The Standing Room 208 Underground 229 Chelsea 229 Rebel Republic 198 Suzy’s 140 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3884 342 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 19-0676 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Regular Meeting of October 15, 2019 Verbal Report on City Council Actions City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/20/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™343 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 19-0677 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Regular Meeting of October 15, 2019 Verbal Status Report on Major Planning Projects City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™344 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 19-0678 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Regular Meeting of October 15, 2019 November 19, 2019 Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda Items Recommended Action: To receive and file the November 19, 2019 Planning Commission tentative future agenda items. Attachment: 1. Planning Commission November 19, 2019 Tentative Future Agenda Respectfully Submitted by: Beverly Tuazon, Administrative Assistant Approved: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 2/20/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™345 F:\B95\CD\PC\Future Items\Tent. Future Agendas\Planning Commission Tentative Agenda for 11-19-19.docx 10/09/2019 9:26 AM Tentative Future Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION City of Hermosa Beach November 19, 2019 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Project Title Public Notice Meeting Date  906-910 Hermosa Ave – PDP Amendment 19-9 for a request to modify the elevator design to provide access to all floor levels and for elevator housing to be constructed above the height limit. 11/7/19 11/19/19  645 10th St – CON 19-4, PDP 19-7 and VTPM #82783 for a two-unit condominium project. 11/7/19 11/19/19  2515 Pacific Coast Highway (Hotel Hermosa) – CUP 19-9 for a request to provide on-sale beer and wine sale, service and consumption indoors Sunday through Thursday 6:00 AM to 9:00 PM and Friday and Saturday 6:00 AM to 11:00 PM and outdoors Sunday through Thursday 6:00 AM to 9:00 PM and Friday and Saturday 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM at an existing hotel. 11/7/19 11/19/19  2447 Pacific Coast Highway- CUP Amendment 19-3 for a request to modify an existing non-conforming rooftop wireless telecommunication facility (AT&T Mobility) continued from the August 20, 2019 and October 15, 2019 meetings. 11/7/19 11/19/19  Consideration of a potential Municipal Code text amendment to the M-1 Light Manufacturing Zone to consider allowing Cypress District businesses to host openings or events to showcase and offer products for sale on a limited basis. 11/7/19 11/19/19  1220 Hermosa Avenue (Laurel Tavern) – CUP Amendment 19-10 to extend the hours of operation at an existing restaurant. 11/7/19 11/19/19  Triannual Report for On-Sale Alcoholic Beverage Conditional Use Permits. n/a 11/19/19 346 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 19-0679 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Regular Meeting of October 15, 2019 Community Development Department Activity Report of May and June 2019 Recommended Action: To receive and file the May and June 2019 Community Development Department activity report. The June 2019 activity report will be posted as a supplemental attachment prior to the October 15, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. Attachment: 1. Community Development Department activity report of May 2019 Respectfully Submitted by: Beverly Tuazon, Administrative Assistant Approved: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 5/3/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™347 1 City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department Activity Report May 2019 BUILDING DIVISION MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT NUMBER OF PERMITS TYPE OF ACTIVITY CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE LAST FY TOTAL Building 35 55 418 456 515 Plumbing 25 19 258 238 256 Mechanical 18 15 192 154 177 Electric 30 20 288 284 321 Plan Check 9 27 213 212 237 Sewer Use 2 0 10 10 11 Res. Bldg. Reports 16 30 161 212 230 Parks & Recreation 0 0 0 0 0 In Lieu Parks & Rec 2 0 17 13 14 Board of Appeals 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Review 1 1 27 26 32 Fire Flow Fees 4 4 62 57 59 Legal Determination 0 0 0 0 0 Zoning Appeals 0 0 0 0 0 Temporary Sign 0 1 28 18 18 Gen. Plan Maintenance 4 3 90 61 65 TOTALS 146 175 1,764 1,741 1,936 FEES COLLECTED TYPE OF FEE CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE LAST FY TOTAL Building $35,082.94 $35,171.54 $521,279.98 $463,647.58 $506,838.00 Plumbing $6,217.10 $4,273.80 $73,027.10 $60,297.10 $65,786.10 Mechanical $4,529.30 $2,775.00 $43,907.30 $37,305.30 $42,084.30 Electric $6,661.30 $5,909.00 $74,291.30 $85,171.10 $91,513.60 Plan Check $20,208.10 $42,558.77 $344,744.42 $611,069.63 $636,657.81 Sewer Use $1,384.00 $0.00 $21,442.00 $39,630.98 $45,394.98 Res. Bldg. Reports $3,927.00 $7,110.00 $38,913.00 $49,642.20 $53,908.20 Parks & Recreation $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 In Lieu Parks & Rec. $12,606.00 $0.00 $197,117.00 $115,963.00 $150,758.00 Board of Appeals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Sign Review $637.00 $613.00 $16,381.00 $13,966.00 $17,626.00 Fire Flow Fees $928.73 $562.50 $14,992.25 $14,336.39 $15,549.87 Legal Determination $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Zoning Appeals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Temporary Sign $0.00 $82.00 $2,364.00 $1,453.00 $1,453.00 Gen. Plan Maintenance $5,652.00 $4,362.00 $106,470.00 $80,607.00 $87,840.00 TOTALS $97,833.47 $103,417.61 $1,454,929.35 $1,573,089.28 $1,715,409.86 348 2 May 2019 CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES *Patrol Checks are citywide proactive patrols. **Short Term Vacation Rentals Cases are properties receiving citations. ***Miscellaneous complaints are any other violations not listed. BUILDING INSPECTION ACTIVITIES CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE 249 276 2,646 3,453 TYPE OF ACTIVITY CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE Radio Calls 4 14 96 91 Citations 1 2 13 45 Citizen Contacts 38 167 1,075 659 Patrol Checks* 53 67 637 1041 Short term vacation rentals Cases** 4 25 75 56 Smoking 226 582 3,408 3507 Trash can storage 19 16 246 117 Sign violations 9 20 158 90 Construction 11 24 129 146 Noise 2 14 60 66 Public Nuisance 7 11 94 66 Encroachment 12 11 187 66 CUP Violations 9 3 218 26 Storm water pollution 2 2 44 34 Clean Bay Inspections 0 0 7 37 Styrofoam 0 0 3 6 Plastic bag ban 0 4 9 31 Miscellaneous complaints*** 7 20 282 159 349 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF MAY 2019 TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS DWELLING UNITS VALUATION 1 101 New Single Family Houses Detached 3 3 $1,751,939.70 2 102 New Single Family Houses Attached 3 103 New Two Family Buildings 4 104 New 3 or 4 Family Buildings 5 105 New 5 or More Family Buildings 6 213 New Hotels/Motels 7 214 New Other Non Housekeeping 8 318 New Amusement & Recreation 9 319 New Churches/Other 10 320 New Industrial Buildings 11 321 New Parking Garages. 12 322 New Service Stations/Repair Garages 13 323 New Hospitals/Other Institutional 14 324 New Offices/Banks 15 325 New Public Works/Utility Buildings 16 326 New Schools/Other Educational 17 327 New Stores/Other Merch Bldgs. 18 328 New Other Non Residential Buildings 19 329 New Structures Other Than Building 3 $150,000.00 20 434 Add/Alter Dwelling/Pools 25 $428,520.00 21 437 Add/Alter Non Residential 2 $40,000.00 22 438 Residential Garages/Carports 23 645 Demolition - Single Family Houses 1 1 $15,000.00 24 646 Demolition - 2-Family Buildings 1 2 $26,500.00 25 647 Demolition - 3-4 Family Buildings 26 648 Demolition - 5+ Family Buildings 27 649 Demolition - All Other Buildings 28 434/ 437 Solar System (Fee waived if 2 or more systems are installed) 1 $290,000.00 36 $2,701,959.70 TOTAL UNITS ADDED FY 2018-19 TO DATE: __45__ TOTAL UNITS DEMOLISHED/LOST FY TO DATE: __38___ (See Attached List) TOTAL NET UNITS FY TO DATE: _7_ FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 Total New Dwelling Units: 49 Total New Dwelling Units: 53 Total New Dwelling Units: 34 Total Demolished/Lost Units: 68 Total Demolished/Lost Units: 58 Total Demolished/Lost Units: 50 Net Unit: -19 Net Unit: -5 Net Unit: -16 350 4 Dwelling Units Demolished/Lost as of May 2019 (FY 2018-19) ADDRESS TYPE PERMIT DATE PERMIT NO. NO. OF UNIT 434 30th Street Single Family Residence 7/19/18 B18-00338 1 1610 Loma Drive 3-Unit Building 8/6/18 B18-00365 3 2457 Myrtle Avenue Single Family Residence 8/7/18 B18-00367 1 1706 Manhattan Avenue Single Family Residence 8/7/18 B18-00369 1 1037 2nd Street Single Family Residence 8/8/18 B18-00371 1 2131 Monterey Blvd. Single Family Residence 8/14/18 B18-00382 1 916 The Strand Single Family Residence 8/28/18 B18-00402 1 349 26th Street Single Family Residence 9/5/18 B18-00408 1 1401 Corona Single Family Residence 9/27/18 B18-00446 1 2428 The Strand Single Family Residence 10/9/18 B18-00466 1 1246 20th Place Single Family Residence 10/18/18 B18-00478 1 1830 The Strand Single Family Residence 10/18/18 B18-00479 1 157 Monterey Blvd. Single Family Residence 10/23/18 B18-00486 1 744 Longfellow Ave. Single Family Residence 11/21/18 B18-00505 1 1012 2nd Ave. Single Family Residence 11/15/18 B18-00540 1 701 Longfellow Single Family Residence 11/26/18 B18-00550 1 411 29th Street Single Family Residence 12/3/18 B18-00495 1 541 Gravely Court Single Family Residence 12/27/18 B18-00575 1 961 5th Street Single Family Residence 12/24/18 B18-00581 1 959 5th Street Single Family Residence 12/24/18 B18-00582 1 240 34th Street Single Family Residence 1/16/19 B19-00017 1 522 24th Place Single Family Residence 1/22/19 B19-00022 1 230 The Strand 3-Unit Building 3/19/19 B19-00088 3 2722 Hermosa Avenue Single Family Residence 3/25/19 B19-00093 1 945 15th Street 2-Unit Building 3/26/19 B19-00081 2 255 28th Street Single Family Residence 3/27/19 B19-00101 1 125 30th Street 2-Unit Building 3/27/19 B19-00104 2 816 Manhattan Avenue 2-Unit Building 4/9/19 B19-00124 2 128 Longfellow Avenue Single Family Residence 5/28/19 B18-00164 1 220 27th Street 2-Unit Building 5/29/19 B19-00192 2 Total: 38 351 5 ACTIVITY REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION May 2019 STAFF REPORT PREPARED SUBJECT THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE LAST FY TOTAL Appeal / Reconsideration 0 0 0 1 1 Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) - Condominiums 0 1 5 10 10 Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) - Commercial 0 1 3 2 2 C.U.P. / Precise Development Plan Amendment 1 0 4 2 3 Conditional Use Permit Modification / Revocation 0 0 0 1 2 Conditional Use Permit / Map Extension 0 0 0 3 3 Environmental Impact Report 0 0 1 0 0 Final Map 3 1 9 11 11 General Plan Amendment / Update 1 0 1 1 1 Height Limit Exception 0 0 0 0 0 Lot Line Adjustment 0 0 1 0 0 Precise Development Plan 0 0 2 2 2 Parking Plan 0 2 2 3 3 Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 0 0 0 0 0 Text Amendment 1 1 5 10 11 Transit 1 0 1 0 0 Variance 0 0 0 0 0 Zone Change 0 0 0 2 2 Miscellaneous 6 2 78 63 68 Total Reports Prepared 13 8 112 111 119 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Tuazon Administrative Assistant CONCUR: Ken Robertson, Director Community Development Department F:\B95\CD\Activity Report\2019\5-2019.docx 352 1 City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department Activity Report June 2019 BUILDING DIVISION MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT NUMBER OF PERMITS TYPE OF ACTIVITY CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE LAST FY TOTAL Building 42 58 460 515 515 Plumbing 21 18 279 256 256 Mechanical 18 23 210 177 177 Electric 29 37 317 321 321 Plan Check 19 25 232 237 237 Sewer Use 0 1 10 11 11 Res. Bldg. Reports 18 18 179 230 230 Parks & Recreation 0 0 0 0 0 In Lieu Parks & Rec 0 1 17 14 14 Board of Appeals 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Review 1 6 28 32 32 Fire Flow Fees 5 2 67 59 59 Legal Determination 0 0 0 0 0 Zoning Appeals 0 0 0 0 0 Temporary Sign 1 0 29 18 18 Gen. Plan Maintenance 7 4 97 65 65 TOTALS 161 194 1,925 1,936 1,936 FEES COLLECTED TYPE OF FEE CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE LAST FY TOTAL Building $46,664.71 $43,190.42 $567,944.69 $506,838.00 $506,838.00 Plumbing $6,371.00 $5,489.00 $79,398.10 $65,786.10 $65,786.10 Mechanical $10,086.00 $4,779.00 $53,993.30 $42,084.30 $42,084.30 Electric $10,416.00 $6,342.50 $84,707.30 $91,513.60 $91,513.60 Plan Check $26,641.01 $25,588.18 $371,385.43 $636,657.81 $636,657.81 Sewer Use $0.00 $5,764.00 $21,442.00 $45,394.98 $45,394.98 Res. Bldg. Reports $4,428.00 $4,266.00 $43,341.00 $53,908.20 $53,908.20 Parks & Recreation $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 In Lieu Parks & Rec. $0.00 $34,795.00 $197,117.00 $150,758.00 $150,758.00 Board of Appeals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Sign Review $637.00 $3,660.00 $17,018.00 $17,626.00 $17,626.00 Fire Flow Fees $1,267.30 $1,213.48 $16,259.55 $15,549.87 $15,549.87 Legal Determination $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Zoning Appeals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Temporary Sign $85.00 $0.00 $2,449.00 $1,453.00 $1,453.00 Gen. Plan Maintenance $8,652.00 $7,233.00 $115,122.00 $87,840.00 $87,840.00 TOTALS $115,248.02 $142,320.58 $1,570,177.37 $1,715,409.86 $1,715,409.86 353 2 June 2019 CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES *Patrol Checks are citywide proactive patrols. **Short Term Vacation Rentals Cases are properties receiving citations. ***Miscellaneous complaints are any other violations not listed. BUILDING INSPECTION ACTIVITIES CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE 259 254 2,905 3,707 TYPE OF ACTIVITY CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE Radio Calls 22 18 118 109 Citations 0 2 13 47 Citizen Contacts 89 274 1,164 933 Patrol Checks* 33 92 670 1,133 Short term vacation rentals Cases** 2 26 77 82 Smoking 102 621 3,510 4,128 Trash can storage 32 20 278 137 Sign violations 4 2 162 92 Construction 6 27 135 173 Noise 4 16 64 82 Public Nuisance 3 12 97 78 Encroachment 11 16 198 82 CUP Violations 9 3 227 29 Storm water pollution 3 5 47 39 Clean Bay Inspections 1 0 8 37 Styrofoam 3 0 6 6 Plastic bag ban 2 4 11 35 Miscellaneous complaints*** 42 35 324 194 354 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF JUNE 2019 TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS DWELLING UNITS VALUATION 1 101 New Single Family Houses Detached 3 3 $2,253,836.14 2 102 New Single Family Houses Attached 3 103 New Two Family Buildings 4 104 New 3 or 4 Family Buildings 5 105 New 5 or More Family Buildings 6 213 New Hotels/Motels 7 214 New Other Non Housekeeping 8 318 New Amusement & Recreation 9 319 New Churches/Other 10 320 New Industrial Buildings 11 321 New Parking Garages. 12 322 New Service Stations/Repair Garages 13 323 New Hospitals/Other Institutional 14 324 New Offices/Banks 15 325 New Public Works/Utility Buildings 16 326 New Schools/Other Educational 17 327 New Stores/Other Merch Bldgs. 18 328 New Other Non Residential Buildings 19 329 New Structures Other Than Building 1 $5,000.00 20 434 Add/Alter Dwelling/Pools 30 $921,412.00 21 437 Add/Alter Non Residential 1 $232,734.00 22 438 Residential Garages/Carports 23 645 Demolition - Single Family Houses 1 1 $11,000.00 24 646 Demolition - 2-Family Buildings 1 2 $10,000.00 25 647 Demolition - 3-4 Family Buildings 26 648 Demolition - 5+ Family Buildings 27 649 Demolition - All Other Buildings 28 434/ 437 Solar System (Fee waived if 2 or more systems are installed) 3 $18,000.00 40 $3,451,982.14 TOTAL UNITS ADDED FY 2018-19 TO DATE: __48__ TOTAL UNITS DEMOLISHED/LOST FY TO DATE: __41___ (See Attached List) TOTAL NET UNITS FY TO DATE: _7_ FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 Total New Dwelling Units: 49 Total New Dwelling Units: 53 Total New Dwelling Units: 34 Total Demolished/Lost Units: 68 Total Demolished/Lost Units: 58 Total Demolished/Lost Units: 50 Net Unit: -19 Net Unit: -5 Net Unit: -16 355 4 Dwelling Units Demolished/Lost as of June 2019 (FY 2018-19) ADDRESS TYPE PERMIT DATE PERMIT NO. NO. OF UNIT 434 30th Street Single Family Residence 7/19/18 B18-00338 1 1610 Loma Drive 3-Unit Building 8/6/18 B18-00365 3 2457 Myrtle Avenue Single Family Residence 8/7/18 B18-00367 1 1706 Manhattan Avenue Single Family Residence 8/7/18 B18-00369 1 1037 2nd Street Single Family Residence 8/8/18 B18-00371 1 2131 Monterey Blvd. Single Family Residence 8/14/18 B18-00382 1 916 The Strand Single Family Residence 8/28/18 B18-00402 1 349 26th Street Single Family Residence 9/5/18 B18-00408 1 1401 Corona Single Family Residence 9/27/18 B18-00446 1 2428 The Strand Single Family Residence 10/9/18 B18-00466 1 1246 20th Place Single Family Residence 10/18/18 B18-00478 1 1830 The Strand Single Family Residence 10/18/18 B18-00479 1 157 Monterey Blvd. Single Family Residence 10/23/18 B18-00486 1 744 Longfellow Ave. Single Family Residence 11/21/18 B18-00505 1 1012 2nd Ave. Single Family Residence 11/15/18 B18-00540 1 701 Longfellow Single Family Residence 11/26/18 B18-00550 1 411 29th Street Single Family Residence 12/3/18 B18-00495 1 541 Gravely Court Single Family Residence 12/27/18 B18-00575 1 961 5th Street Single Family Residence 12/24/18 B18-00581 1 959 5th Street Single Family Residence 12/24/18 B18-00582 1 240 34th Street Single Family Residence 1/16/19 B19-00017 1 522 24th Place Single Family Residence 1/22/19 B19-00022 1 230 The Strand 3-Unit Building 3/19/19 B19-00088 3 2722 Hermosa Avenue Single Family Residence 3/25/19 B19-00093 1 945 15th Street 2-Unit Building 3/26/19 B19-00081 2 255 28th Street Single Family Residence 3/27/19 B19-00101 1 125 30th Street 2-Unit Building 3/27/19 B19-00104 2 816 Manhattan Avenue 2-Unit Building 4/9/19 B19-00124 2 128 Longfellow Avenue Single Family Residence 5/28/19 B18-00164 1 220 27th Street 2-Unit Building 5/29/19 B19-00192 2 730 24th Place Single Family Residence 6/3/19 B19-00184 1 123 34th Street 2-Unit Building 6/25/19 B19-00232 2 Total: 41 356 5 ACTIVITY REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION June 2019 STAFF REPORT PREPARED SUBJECT THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE LAST FY TOTAL Appeal / Reconsideration 0 0 0 1 1 Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) - Condominiums 0 0 5 10 10 Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) - Commercial 1 0 4 2 2 C.U.P. / Precise Development Plan Amendment 2 1 7 3 3 Conditional Use Permit Modification / Revocation 0 1 0 2 2 Conditional Use Permit / Map Extension 0 0 0 3 3 Environmental Impact Report 0 0 3 0 0 Final Map 2 0 11 11 11 General Plan Amendment / Update 0 0 1 1 1 Height Limit Exception 0 0 0 0 0 Lot Line Adjustment 0 0 1 0 0 Precise Development Plan 1 0 5 2 2 Parking Plan 0 0 5 3 3 Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 0 0 0 0 0 Text Amendment 0 1 6 11 11 Transit 0 0 1 0 0 Variance 1 0 1 0 0 Zone Change 0 0 0 2 2 Miscellaneous 6 5 92 68 68 Total Reports Prepared 13 8 142 119 119 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Tuazon Administrative Assistant CONCUR: Ken Robertson, Director Community Development Department F:\B95\CD\Activity Report\2019\6-2019.docx 357