The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2013-05-22 PC AGENDA AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH C ITY H ALL C OUNCIL C HAMBERS 1315 V ALLEY D RIVE H ERMOSA B EACH, C A 90254 May 22, 2013 7:00 P.M. Ron Pizer, Chairman Peter Hoffman, Vice Chairman Kent Allen Michael Flaherty Sam Perrotti Note: No Smoking Is Allowed in the City Hall Council Chambers THE PUBLIC COMMENT IS LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER Planning Commission agendas and staff reports are available for review www.hermosabch.org. Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the Community Development Department during normal business hours from Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Final determinations of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the next regular City Council meeting date. If the 10th day falls on a Friday or City holiday, the appeal deadline is extended to the next City business day. Appeals shall be in written form and filed with the City Clerk's office, accompanied by an appeal fee. The City Clerk will set the appeal for public hearing before the City of Hermosa Beach City Council at the earliest date possible. If you challenge any City of Hermosa Beach decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described on this agenda, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices will be available for check out at the meeting. If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call or submit your request in writing to the Community Development Department at (310) 318-0242 at least 48 hours (two working days) prior to the meeting time to inform us of your needs and to determine if/how accommodation is feasible. 1 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Oral / Written Communications Anyone wishing to address the Commission regarding a matter not related to a public hearing on the agenda may do so at this time. Section 1 Consent Calendar 4. Approval of the April 16, 2013 Action Minutes 5. Resolution(s) for Consideration - None T HE RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED BELOW ARE FROM THE PLANNING STAFF AND ARE RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY. T HE FINAL DECISION ON EACH ITEM RESTS WITH THE P LANNING C OMMISSION. P LEASE DO NOT ASSUME THAT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WILL BE THE ACTION OF THE P LANNING C OMMISSION. Section II Public Hearing 6. CUP 12-11 / PDP 12-11 -- Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan Amendments to convert an existing auto body, painting and general repair use Car Service) to auto repair and sales for a maximum of two vehicles use (Lexology Auto Care); substantially replace 4,816+ sq. ft. of buildings with 9,203+ sq. ft. of buildings (6,000+ sq. ft. auto repair and 3,203 sq. ft. accessory office/storage) surface parking and landscaping; and amend hours of operation and other conditions for consistency with the revised use and site plan, in the C-3 zone at 1086 Aviation Boulevard and 1111 Prospect Avenue; and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration (continued from the April 16, 2013 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To open the public hearing and continue as requested by the applicant to June 18, 2013. 7. PDP 13-1 / CUP 13-1 / PARK 13-1 -- (1) Precise Development Plan to allow a 29,544+ square foot hotel with 30 rooms and common areas on an undeveloped 11,516+ square foot lot at 1429 Hermosa Avenue; (2) Conditional Use Permit to allow on-sale general alcohol (mini-bars) in guest rooms, in common areas for hotel guests, and in specified areas that may be used by hotel guests or for private events by reservation; (3) Parking Plan to allow a valet program including less than required parking and parking in tandem onsite, together with four offsite shared parking spaces at 205 Pier Avenue in conjunction with specified areas when reserved for private events; and (4) Parking Plan amendment for 205 Pier Avenue to allow this shared parking; and adoption of environmental Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan. Staff Recommended Action: To adopt the resolution approving subject Precise Development Plan, Parking Plan, and Conditional Use Permit subject to conditions and adopting an environmental Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan. 2 8.CON 13-5 / PDP 13-6 --Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 72187 for a 2-unit condominium at 1515 Hermosa Avenue. Staff Recommended Action: To adopt the resolution approving subject Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map subject to conditions. 9. CON 13-2 / PDP 13-3 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map No. 72198 for a 2-unit condominium at 920 17th Street (east lot). Staff Recommended Action: To adopt the resolution approving subject Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Tentative Parcel Map subject to conditions. 10. CON 13-3 / PDP 13-4 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map No. 72199 for a 2-unit condominium at 920 17th Street (west lot). Staff Recommended Action: To adopt the resolution approving subject Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Tentative Parcel Map subject to conditions. 11. TEXT 13-1 -- Text Amendment to Municipal Code to implement Housing Programs in the 2008-2014 Housing Element of the Hermosa Beach General Plan, including emergency shelters, single room occupancy units, transitional and supportive housing, group homes, residential care facilities, density bonuses, lot consolidation incentives, minimum dwelling sizes, second units in R-1 zone, parking, and other minor amendments to conform to State law and the Housing Program Staff Recommended Action: To adopt the resolution recommending to the City Council adoption of Municipal Code amendments to implement the 2008-2014 General Plan Housing Element. 12. GP 13-1 -- Amendment to the Housing Element of the Hermosa Beach General Plan for the 2013-2021 planning period. policies, objectives, and programs to preserve, improve and develop housing within Hermosa Beach. Its strategies and programs focus on providing diverse housing sites and opportunities; conserving and improving the existing housing stock; removing governmental and other constraints to housing development; and promoting equal housing opportunities; and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration. Staff Recommended Action: To adopt the resolution recommending City Council tentatively approve the 2013-2021 amendment to the Housing Element and adopt a Negative Declaration. Section III 13. Staff Items a. Report on City Council actions. b. Report on comprehensive planning processes. c. Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. d. Community Development Department activity reports of March, 2013. 14. Commissioner Items 15. Adjournment 3 ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HELD ON APRIL 16, 2013, 7:00 P.M., AT THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS All public testimony and the deliberations of the Planning Commission can be viewed at www.hermosabch.org, On-Demand Video of City Meetings The meeting was called to order at 7:02 P.M. by Chairman Pizer. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call Present: Commissioner Allen, Flaherty, Hoffman, Perrotti, Chairman Pizer Absent: None Also Present: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Gregg Kovacevich, Assistant City Attorney Pamela Townsend, Senior Planner Eva Choi, Assistant Planner Garth Gaines, lieutenant 3. Oral / Written Communications Anyone wishing to address the Commission regarding a matter not related to a public hearing on the agenda may do so at this time. Section I CONSENT CALENDAR 4. Approval of the March 19, 2013 action minutes ACTION: To approve the above minutes as presented. MOTION by Commissioner Perrotti, seconded by Commissioner Hoffman. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 5. Resolution(s) for Consideration - None Section II Public Hearing 6. CUP 12-11 / PDP 12-11 -- Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan amendments to convert an auto body, painting and general repair use to auto repair and sales for a maximum of two vehicles; substantially replace 4,816+ square feet of buildings with 9,203+ square feet of buildings (6,000+ square feet auto repair and 3,203+ square feet of accessory office/storage), surface parking and landscaping; and amend hours of operation 4 1 Planning Commission Action Minutes April 16, 2013 and other conditions for consistency with the revised use and site plan; and adoption of Environmental Negative Declaration, at 1086 Aviation Boulevard/1111 Prospect Avenue. Staff Recommended Action: To adopt the resolution approving subject Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan amendments subject to the conditions. ACTION: To move to re-open the public hearing and continue to Wednesday, May 22, 2013. MOTION by Commissioner Flaherty, seconded by Commissioner Hoffman. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Comms. Allen, Flaherty, Hoffman, Perrotti, Chmn. Pizer NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None 7. PDP 13-1 / CUP 13-1 / PARK 13-1 -- Precise Development Plan to allow a 21,984+ square foot hotel with 30 rooms and common areas on an undeveloped 11,516+ square foot lot at 1429 Hermosa Avenue; Conditional Use Permit to allow on-sale beer and wine in guest rooms and for guests in common areas; Parking Plan to allow less than required parking, parking in tandem, and four offsite shared parking spaces at 205 Pier Avenue in conjunction with hotel meeting rooms for public use; parking plan amendment for 205 Pier Avenue to allow this shared parking; and adoption of Environmental Negative Declaration. Staff Recommended Action: To open the public hearing and continue the public hearing to May 22, 2013. ACTION: To continue the public hearing to May 22, 2013. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Perrotti. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Comms. Allen, Flaherty, Hoffman, Perrotti, Chmn. Pizer NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Section III Hearing 8. S-4 #27 -- Request to deem a display covering ± 900 square feet of the north wall of the Staff Recommended Action by minute order. ACTION: To deem redesigned or reconfigured so that it does not incorporate the existing marquee sign. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Perrotti. The motion carried by the following vote: 2 Planning Commission Action Minutes April 16, 2013 AYES: Comms. Flaherty, Hoffman, Perrotti NOES: Comm. Allen, Chmn. Pizer ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None 9. C-36 -- Annual review and report on Conditional Use Permit compliance for on-sale alcoholic beverage establishments. Staff Recommended Action: To receive and file. ACTION: To receive and file. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Perrotti. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Section IV 10. Staff Items a. Status of 2021 Housing Element update and discussion and direction regarding Municipal Code amendments and programs to implement adopted 2012 General Plan Housing Element. ACTION: The Planning Commission consensus was to provide direction regarding emergency shelters and to retain existing nonconforming unit provisions. b. Report on City Council actions. c. Report on comprehensive planning processes. d. Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. e. Community Development Department activity reports of January and February, 2013. f. Memorandum regarding Planning Commission meeting date change from Tuesday, May 21, 2013, to Wednesday, May 22, 2013. 11. Commissioner Items 12. Adjournment The meeting was formally adjourned at 10:05 P.M. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of April 16, 2013. Ron Pizer, Chairman Ken Robertson, Secretary Date 3 Planning Commission Action Minutes April 16, 2013 Attachment 4: Zoning Map 1086 Aviation Blvd & 1111 Prospect Avenue Prospect Avenue Pacific Coast Highway 42 Attachment 5: Legal Posting 43 ATTACHMENT 7 Traffic Impact Analysis & Parking Study for Lexology Auto Repair at 1086 Aviation Boulevard & 1111 Prospect Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Project Site PresentedTo: City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department CivicCenter 1315ValleyDrive HermosaBeach,CA90254 PreparedBy: MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffic Engineering –Transportation Planning –ITS Consultants 18662 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 435 Airport Business Center Irvine, CA 92612 Tel: (949)727-3399 ¤ Fax: (949)727-4418 Web: www.minagarinc.com Email: minagarf@minagarinc.com 02/04/13 47 February 4, 2013 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS & TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS & PARKING STUDY PARKING STUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086 A VIATION B OULEVARD & 1111 P ROSPECT A VENUE H ERMOSA B EACH, CA 90254 (APN4186-001-001 & 002) PRESENTED TO: City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 PREPARED BY: MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSPORTATION PLANNING - ITS 18662 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 435, Irvine, CA 92612 Tel: (949) 727-3399 - Fax: (949) 727-4418 http://www.minagarinc.com 48 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1.INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................... 5 1.2 Analysis Methodology ........................................................................... 9 1.3 Traffic Impact Significance Criteria .................................................... 13 2.EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Existing Roadway System .................................................................... 14 2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes ...................................................................... 15 2.3 Existing (Year 2012) Intersection Operations ............................... 15 2.4 Proposed Project Traffic ..................................................................... 16 3.PLUS PROJECT AND CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS 3.1 Existing (2013) Plus Project Conditions .......................................... 18 3.2 Existing (2013) + Project + Cumulative Development ................ 19 4.PROJECT IMPACT ASSESSMENT 4.1 Significant Project Impacts ................................................................... 20 4.2 Mitigation ................................................................................................. 20 5.CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 33 __________________________________________________________________________ 3 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 49 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 Figures Figure 1 - Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................ 7 Figure 2 - Site Plan ............................................................................................................... 8 Figure 3 - Project Site Access ........................................................................................... 9 Figure 4 - Existing Lane Configurations & Intersection Controls ............................. 10 Figure 5 - Project Trip Distribution & AM/PM Peak Hour Trip Generation ......... 21 Figure 7 - Project Trip Generation Ï Weekday AM/PM Peak Hour ....................... 22 Figure 8A - Cumulative 2014 Plus Project Traffic Ï AM Peak Hour ....................... 28 Figure 8B - Cumulative 2014 Plus Project Traffic Ï PM Peak Hour ......................... 29 Tables Table 1 - Project Information Summary .......................................................................... 7 Table 2 - ICU Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections ........................ 12 Table 3 - Existing Roadway System Characteristics ..................................................... 15 Table 4 - Existing AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service (LOS) .......... 16 Table 5 - Project Trip Generation .................................................................................... 27 Table 6 - Existing (2013) Plus Project Intersection LOS ............................................. 19 Table 7 - Existing + Project + Cumulative Developments Intersection LOS ......... 19 Table 8 - Cumulative/Project Impacts on the Study Intersection ............................. 21 Appendices APPENDIX A - Weekday Intersection Turning Movement Traffic Counts APPENDIX B - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Level of Service Analysis Worksheets (Synchro-8) APPENDIX C - City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Parking Code: Application Sections __________________________________________________________________________ 4 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 50 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Minagar & Associates, Inc. (Minagar) has prepared the following report which summarizes the results of a traffic impact analysis completed for the proposed remodeling and building additions to an existing auto repair facility located at the southwest corner of Aviation Boulevard and Prospect Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. The proposed site improvements include a project plan to demolish the existing building on Prospect Avenue (~1,811 SF), construct a new 2,723-SF office space with storage basement and restroom areas, and renovate two (2) existing repair shops by extending each building toward the property frontage on Aviation Boulevard. The total proposed project site building area is 9,203 square feet, as shown on the attached architectural plan. As part of MinagarÔs traffic analysis, the following scenarios were evaluated: Existing Conditions (Year 2013) Existing (Year 2013) Plus Project Conditions Existing (Year 2013) + Project + Cumulative Projects The proposed project is estimated to generate 27 AM peak hour trips and 31 PM peak hour trips. An analysis of Year 2013 ÑPlus ProjectÒ conditions revealed that the study intersection at Aviation Boulevard and Prospect Avenue would not be adversely impacted by the proposed project and/or cumulative background traffic. Therefore, the project applicant will not be required to provide any mitigation measures as part of this proposed auto repair shop renovation and expansion project. 1.0 Ï INTRODUCTION 1.1 Ð Project Background Project Description. The project applicant is proposing to renovate an existing auto repair facility at the southwest corner of Aviation Boulevard and Prospect Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beach. The project includes demolishing an existing building on the Prospect Avenue side of the property, constructing a new office space (2,723 SF) with __________________________________________________________________________ 5 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 51 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 basement and restroom areas (525 SF), and constructing building additions to each of the two existing repair shops on Aviation Boulevard, including 1,372 SF to Shop #1 and 2,970 SF to Shop #2. The existing site consists of a car repair/oil change facility which is currently not in operation. The proposed Lexology Auto Repair shop and hand wash facility will be constructed in a single construction phase by the end of 2013. Parking. In accordance with the City of Hermosa Beach's Municipal Parking Code Ch. 17.44 "Off-Street Parking," the site is required to provide 1 parking space per 1,000 SF square feet of site area. Given the project site lot area of 15,584 square feet, the applicant is thus required to provide at least 16 parking spaces. Based on the proposed parking supply of 18 spaces, the project exceeds the City of Hermosa BeachÔs minimum off-street parking supply requirements by two additional spaces. The proposed stacked parking configuration on Prospect Avenue is considered acceptable for employees or customers, since general practice of automobile care centers requires that vehicles be dropped off in any available parking spot and left for staff to re-park into an available repair shop bay when it is ready to be serviced. No on- street parking spaces are currently permitted at this location. Access. Vehicular access to the site will be provided via two (2) existing commercial driveways on Aviation Boulevard and Prospect Avenue. The access driveway on Aviation is located just west of the signal, and provides right-in/right-out (RIRO) access only. The access driveway on Prospect in located just south of the signal, and provides full access to traffic on Prospect Avenue. The Project will install metal security gates on each driveway when business is closed each day. Table 1 below outlines the projectÔs general information. Figure 1 depicts the location of the project. Figure 2 illustrates the project's latest master site plan. __________________________________________________________________________ 6 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 52 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 IĻƩƒƚƭğ.Ļğĭŷ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ{źƷĻ FIGURE 1: Vicinity Map TABLE 1 Project Information Summary Project Name: Lexology Auto Repair Location: 1086 Aviation Boulevard & 1111 Prospect Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 APN: 4186-01-002 & -002 Status: Requesting CUP Existing Use Proposed Building Area Zoning Land Use Auto Repair/Hand Wash : Auto Repair/ Existing -1,811 SF Building (demo) Oil Change (not in See Site Plan for +1,372 SF addition, Shop #1 C-3 Commercial operation) Ex. Building Areas +2,970 SF addition, Shop #2 : Auto Proposed +2,723 SF Office Space Repair/Hand Wash +525 SF Basement/Restroom Occupancy Hours of Off-street Parking Access Points Type(s) Operations Existing: Aviation Blvd: (1) Right-in/Right-out driveway Required: 16 Prospect Ave: (1) Full Access driveway B N/A Provided: 18 Proposed: No change __________________________________________________________________________ 7 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 53 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 \[FIGURE 2 Ï Site Plan\] __________________________________________________________________________ 8 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 54 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 Local access to the project site is illustrated below in Figure 3. Project Site Demo (E) Bldg. Proposed Renovations Driveway Access Driveway Access FIGURE 3: Project Site Access 1.2 Ð Analysis Methodology Project Study Area. Per the direction of City of Hermosa Beach staff, the scope of the traffic impact study area focused on analyzing the potential traffic impacts at the adjacent existing signalized intersection of Aviation Boulevard and Prospect Avenue. Existing geometrics, lane configurations and traffic controls at the intersection are depicted below in Figure 4. __________________________________________________________________________ 9 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 55 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 Project Site FIGURE 4 Existing Lane Configurations & Intersection Traffic Controls __________________________________________________________________________ 10 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 56 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 Analysis Scenarios. Per the direction of the City of Hermosa Beach, the following scenarios were evaluated in this traffic analysis: Existing Conditions (Year 2013) Ï Analysis of existing weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions, based on collected turning movement counts at the adjacent signalized intersection of Aviation Boulevard and Prospect Avenue. Existing (Year 2013) Plus Project Conditions Ï Analysis of projected traffic conditions with the addition of the project traffic on the adjacent study intersection. Existing (Year 2013) + Project + Cumulative Projects Ï Analysis representing existing (Year 2013) baseline traffic conditions plus the addition of both the proposed project and nearby approved projects expected to open this year. As discussed in the following section, this scenario incorporates both the projectÔs peak hour trips, as well as a 0.2% ambient growth rate applied to the existing year traffic to account for additional traffic cumulatively generated by nearby related developments. Each of the above three scenarios were evaluated during the weekday peak hour periods between 7:00-9:00AM and 4:00-6:00PM. Intersection turning movement counts conducted by Minagar for each intersection are provided in Appendix A. Level of Service Analysis and Criteria. Traffic impact guidelines from the City of Hermosa were utilized to conduct the level of service (LOS) analysis. Per City guidelines, Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology was used to determine the LOS for the study intersection at Aviation Boulevard and Prospect Avenue. The ICU methodology compares the volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios of conflicting turn movements at the intersection, then sums the critical conflicting v/c ratios for each intersection approach and determines the overall intersection capacity utilization. The resulting ICU is expressed in terms of level of service ranging from LOS "A" representing free-flow activity, to LOS "H" representing overcapacity operations. The ICU intersection analysis methodology was applied by Minagar using Synchro-8.0 software to calculate the LOS for each intersection. An LOS of ÑDÒ was considered to be the minimal level of service desired by the City of Hermosa Beach, based on the __________________________________________________________________________ 11 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 57 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 policies of the Transportation & Circulation Element of the CityÔs current General Plan. The LOS D standard applies to all City facilities within the City of Hermosa Beach. Table 2 summarizes the ICU LOS criteria. All supporting data and ICU calculation summaries for each analysis scenario are included under Appendix B. TABLE 2 ICU Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Service ICU Description At LOS A, there are no cycles that are fully loaded, and few are even close to loaded. No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. A < 0.61 Typically, the approach appears quite open, turning movements are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. LOS B represents stable operation. An occasional approach phase is fully utilized and a substantial number are approaching B 0.61 Ï 0.70 full use. Many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted with platoons of vehicles. In LOS C stable operation continues. Full signal cycle loading is still intermittent, but more frequent. Occasionally drivers may C 0.71 Ï 0.80 have to wait though more than one red signal indication, and back-ups may develop behind turning vehicles. LOS D encompasses a zone of increasing restriction, approaching instability. Delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial during short peaks within the peak period, but D 0.81 Ï 0.90 enough cycles with lower demand occur to permit periodic clearance of developing queues, thus preventing excessive back-ups. LOS E represents the most vehicles that any particular intersection approach can accommodate. At capacity (V/C = 1.00) there may be long queues of vehicles waiting upstream E 0.91 Ï 1.00 of the intersection and delays may be great (up to several signal cycles). LOS F represents jammed conditions. Back-ups from locations downstream or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the approach under F > 1.00 consideration; hence, volumes carried are not predictable, V/C values are highly variable, because full utilization of the approach may be prevented by outside conditions. Represents overcapacity conditions by 0-9% (LOS G) and >9% (LOS H) during the G, H peak hours; long queues are common and motorists may choose alternate routes. Source: "LOS for Arterial Intersections,Ò LA County Congestion Management Program. Cumulative projects: An important factor considered in the traffic analysis was the identification and estimation of cumulative traffic external to the proposed __________________________________________________________________________ 12 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 58 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 project which may impact current and opening year traffic conditions at the study intersection. Information regarding this future traffic growth at the study intersection due to neighboring developments in the Cities of El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach and Torrance was not readily available at the time of the study; in lieu of this information, however, an annual background traffic growth factor was applied. Based on the projected opening year of 2013 and current trends in socioeconomic regional growth (source: Southern California Association of Governments, SCAG), an ambient growth percentage of 0.2% was applied to the background traffic base for the intersection of Aviation Boulevard at Prospect Avenue. It is important to note that the City of Hermosa BeachÔs current General Plan indicates that housing and population growth in these cities is expected to be minimal, and that most of the available land in the cities immediately adjacent to Hermosa Beach is already developed. Furthermore, future cumulative projects in each of the immediately adjacent cities (i.e., Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach and El Segundo) generally consist of replacement and upgrading of existing uses, and because no large-scale development is expected immediately adjacent to the City of Hermosa Beach in the short term, any foreseeable traffic impacts due to cumulative development would likely be limited. Therefore, the projected growth trend of less than 1 percent per year for population, housing and employment, assumed in the study for through traffic in the City is considered to be appropriate. 1.3 Ð Traffic Impact Significance Criteria Thresholds City of Hermosa Beach Significant Impact Threshold: The City of Hermosa Beach General Plan Circulation Element has a minimum level of service policy of LOS ÑDÒ at signalized intersections. The City requires the use of the ICU method to analyze signalized intersections. For the purposes of this TIA, LOS D has been assumed as the minimum LOS for intersections since the intersection at Aviation Boulevard and Prospect Avenue is located solely within the jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach. Based on __________________________________________________________________________ 13 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 59 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 the CityÔs significant criteria, the proposed project would create a significant impact at an unsignalized intersection if it causes the intersection to degrade to LOS E or worse from LOS D or better, or would add 5 percent of traffic to an intersection that is already operating at LOS E or worse. Other potential traffic impacts under the latest California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines were also considered based on a variety of transportation impact factors such as: potential access, circulation or parking issues to or from the proposed project site at Aviation Boulevard or Prospect Avenue; increased local traffic; potential for vehicular conflicts at project and/or other driveways; impacts to or a result from existing turn restrictions; internal site connectivity; and conflicts with pedestrian circulation in the adjacent area. 2.0 Ï EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Ð Existing Roadway System Aviation Boulevard is a designated arterial street in the City of Hermosa Beach, originating at Pacific Coast Highway in the City and curving northward past the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and through the Cities of Manhattan Beach and El Segundo. Within the City of Hermosa Beach, Aviation Boulevard is four-lane undivided highway, with two lanes each way plus curbside parking. It has a curb-to-curb width of 64 feet and carries an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of about 30,000 vehicles per day. Prospect Avenue is a two-lane street designated as a collector in the City of Hermosa Beach. The only signalized intersections on Prospect Avenue in the City are located at Artesia Boulevard to the north, Aviation Boulevard, and at Anita Street to the south. In between these signals on Prospect Avenue, there are numerous four-way stop controlled intersections, including three (3) north of Aviation Boulevard and six (6) south of Aviation Boulevard. An existing elementary school (Hermosa View ES) is thth located on Prospect Avenue between 18 Street and 19 Street. The study intersection at Aviation Boulevard and Prospect Avenue is currently signalized, and is located about 1/3 mile east of Pacific Coast Highway (State Route 1). The nearest signalized intersections on Aviation Boulevard are located at Ocean Drive __________________________________________________________________________ 14 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 60 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 (1,035 feet to the west) and Ford Avenue (1,340 to the east). The nearest stop- th Street (1,590 feet to the controlled intersections on Prospect Avenue are located at 17 th north) and 9 Street (855 feet to the south). The existing roadway system characteristics for the above facilities are provided below in Table 3. TABLE 3 Existing Roadway System Characteristics Right- Existing Existing Estimated Roadway Segment Existing of-Way Existing Width ADT Average Striping/ Width Functional Daily Geometrics Classification Length Capacity Roadway From/To (feet) (feet) (veh/day) (miles) Harper Ave/ Aviation Boulevard 0.42 4 lanes 64 80 Arterial 29,460 29,000 PCH Artesia Blvd/ 0.11 4 lanes 64 80 Collector 8,820 22,000 st 21 St 21st St/ Prospect Avenue 0.55 2 lanes 36 80 Collector n/a 15,000 Aviation Blvd Aviation Blvd/ 0.66 2 lanes 30 80 Collector 17,230 15,000 Anita St. Source: City of Hermosa Beach Circulation, Transportation & Parking Element 2.2 Ð Existing Traffic Volumes Intersection turning movement counts (TMC) were field-counted during weekday peak hours by Minagar staff at the study intersection of Aviation Boulevard and Prospect Avenue. Traffic data collection time frames were determined in collaboration with the City of Hermosa Beach, and included the peak morning and afternoon commuter hours of 7:00-9:00AM and 4:00-6:00PM in late-January 2013. Once collected, the traffic count data was processed and organized to extract the single peak-hour traffic movements. Existing AM/PM peak hours occurred between 7:30-8:30AM and 4:45-5:45PM. 2.3 Ð Existing (Year 2012) Intersection Operations Minagar & Associates, Inc. used the existing collected field data, including traffic volume counts, existing lane geometrics, signal timing/phasing parameters and other intersectional operational assumptions to develop a traffic analysis model of the study __________________________________________________________________________ 15 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 61 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 intersection within the Synchro-8 software program. Existing intersection volume-to- capacity ratios and subsequent LOS were determined using the program's ICU analysis module. As presented in Table 4, below, the results of the existing LOS analysis indicate that the intersection of Aviation Boulevard at Prospect Avenue is currently operating at deficient LOS ÑFÒ and ÑHÒ during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. TABLE 4 Existing (Year 2013) Intersection Level of Service Weekday AM/PM Peak Hours \[1\]\[2\] Study Intersection ICU and LOS Control No. Location AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 96.9% 127.7% Aviation Boulevard at 1 Prospect Avenue F H \[1\] ICU: Represents intersection capacity (v/c ratio) based on the latest Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology (ICU2003) for peak-hour intersection operations. \[2\] Level of Service. Note: LOS ranges reflect the latest ICU analysis methodology to include LOS ÑGÒ and ÑHÒ. 2.4 Ð Proposed Project Traffic The proposed project traffic was estimated using standard methods for trip generation, trip distribution and trip assignment, including estimation of project trips generated by the proposed remodel and expansion during the AM and PM weekday peak hours; distribution and direction of trips accessing the project site; and assignment of the projected trips on the surrounding roadway system. Trip Generation. The trip generation rates used in this analysis were established by applying standard and current data compiled and published by the Institute of th Transportation of Engineers' (ITE) latest Trip Generation manual, 8 Edition (2008). The ITE code and land use designations applicable to the proposed project is ITE Land Use Code #942: Automobile Care Center. Based on these trip rates, the project is anticipated to generate 27 trips during the AM peak hour (18 inbound, 9 outbound) and 31 trips during the PM peak hour 15 inbound and 16 outbound). __________________________________________________________________________ 16 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 62 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 TABLE 5 Ï Project Trip Generation Trip Rates / Generation ITE Land Use Code: Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 942. Automobile Care Ctr. 9,203 SF 2.94 trips/SFGFA* 3.38 trips/SFGFA In/Out Split (%): 65/35 50/50 Total Trip Generation: 27 AM trips 31 PM trips * SFGFA: square feet of gross floor area Trip Distribution/Assignment. The project traffic was assigned to the roadway network using directional distribution based on an analysis of existing AM and PM peak hour volumes and patterns on the surrounding transportation network, local and regional site access during the expected hours of operation, consideration of the City's Circulation Plan, a comparison of trip patterns of other nearby and similar projects in the City of Hermosa Beach, assignment to surrounding residential zones and general proximity to the project site. The project trip distribution pattern and peak-hour trip generation is depicted below on Figure 5. __________________________________________________________________________ 17 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 63 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 3.0 Ï PLUS PROJECT & CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS 3.1 Ð Existing (2013) Plus Project Conditions Minagar & Associates, Inc. analyzed the existing traffic conditions by adding the estimated AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes to the existing Year 2013 baseline. As shown below in Table 6 the resulting LOS analysis indicate that the intersection of Aviation Boulevard and Prospect Avenue will continue to operate at deficient levels of service (LOS E or worse) with the addition of project traffic. __________________________________________________________________________ 18 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 64 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 TABLE 6 Existing (Year 2013) Plus Project Intersection Level of Service Weekday AM/PM Peak Hours \[1\]\[2\] Study Intersection ICU and LOS Control No. Location AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 97.1% 128.0% Aviation Boulevard at 1 Prospect Avenue F H \[1\] ICU: Represents intersection capacity (v/c ratio) based on the latest Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology (ICU2003) for peak-hour intersection operations. \[2\] Level of Service. Note: LOS ranges reflect the latest ICU analysis methodology to include LOS ÑGÒ and ÑHÒ. 3.2 Ð Existing (2013) + Project + Cumulative Development The second of the two forecast scenarios is comprised of adding the anticipated cumulative traffic growth to the Existing (Year 2013) Plus Project conditions for the AM and PM peak hour periods, shown below in Table 7. As with the Plus Project condition, the LOS analysis reveals no change in the anticipated intersection LOS at the study intersection, and will continue to operate below the City of Hermosa BeachÔs acceptable threshold of LOS ÑDÒ or better during the Existing + Project + Cumulative Development conditions. TABLE 7 Existing (Year 2013) + Project + Cumulative Developments Intersection Level of Service Weekday AM/PM Peak Hours \[1\]\[2\] Study Intersection ICU and LOS Control No. Location AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 97.3% 128.2 % Aviation Boulevard at 1 Prospect Avenue F H \[1\] ICU: Represents intersection capacity (v/c ratio) based on the latest Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology (ICU2003) for peak-hour intersection operations. \[2\] Level of Service. Note: LOS ranges reflect the latest ICU analysis methodology to include LOS ÑGÒ and ÑHÒ. __________________________________________________________________________ 19 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 65 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 4.0 Ï PROJECT IMPACT ASSESSMENT 4.1 Ð Significant Project Impacts Anticipated project and cumulative traffic impacts during the year 2013 at the study intersection are summarized below in Table 8. The analysis compared the change in ICU (v/c) and level of service (LOS) using the CityÔs significance criteria to determine cumulative and/or direct project impacts. As shown on Table 9, the intersection of Aviation Boulevard at Prospect Avenue is projected to continue operating at currently deficient Year 2013 levels of service into the projectÔs 2013 build-out phase. Based on the established significance criteria, however, the operating conditions at the study intersection would not be significantly impacted by future traffic growth and/or the proposed auto repair shop renovation project. A significant impact is defined as change in LOS to "E" or worse, or change in V/C ratio greater than 0.05 (i.e., +5%) at an intersection already operating at LOS E or worse. 4.2 Ð Mitigation As described above in Section 4.1, the proposed project is not expected to result in any significant traffic impacts; therefore, no mitigation is necessary. __________________________________________________________________________ 20 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 66 21 2013 4, No No Impact? February (%) ICU +0.5% +0.4% Change B H 97.3% 128.2% Traffic Cumulative Impacts Project + Existing + Cumulative Level of Service (LOS) and F H 2013 96.9% 127.7% Existing No No Impact? 90254 (%) ICU +0.2% +0.3% Change CA , methodology EACH B F 67 H 2013 Project Impacts 97.1% Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 128.0% Existing + Project TABLE 8 ERMOSA H , F H 2013 96.9% 127.7% Existing VENUE A Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology to include LOS ÑGÒ and ÑHÒ. PM AM Peak Hour TUDY ROSPECT S P 1111 Cumulative/Project Impacts on the Study Intersection ARKING P& & (v/c ratio) based on the latest EPAIR NALYSIS OULEVARD R A B UTO A MPACT : LOS ranges reflect the latest ICU analysis I Study Intersection VIATION A Study Intersection RAFFIC EXOLOGY TL1086 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. ICU: Represents intersection capacity Level of Service. Note (1) Aviation Boulevard at Prospect Avenue \[1\] (ICU2003) for peak-hour intersection operations. \[2\] _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 5.0 Ï CONCLUSIONS The proposed project consists of remodeling and building additions to an existing auto repair facility (currently not in operation) located at the southwest corner of Aviation Boulevard and Prospect Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. The total proposed project site building area is 9,203 square feet, with a projected build-out phase to occur late in 2013. The intersection of Aviation Boulevard at Prospect Avenue was analyzed under AM and PM weekday peak hour operations. Based on an analysis of existing morning and afternoon peak hour traffic conditions, the study intersections is currently operating below the CityÔs standard acceptable minimum level of service threshold of LOS ÑDÒ. With the addition of ambient traffic growth in the Year 2013, plus the addition of peak hour vehicle trips resulting from other nearby cumulative development projects, the intersection will continue to operate at deficient LOS D or worse. The proposed project is estimated to generate 27 AM peak hour trips and 31 PM peak hour trips. An analysis of Year 2013 ÑPlus ProjectÒ conditions, as documented in Sections 3.1 through 4.1 of this report, revealed that the study intersection at Aviation be adversely impacted by the proposed Boulevard and Prospect Avenue would not project and/or cumulative background traffic. In addition, the proposed project is anticipated to exceed the City of Hermosa BeachÔs minimum parking supply requirements by an additional two (2) spaces. Therefore, given the results of the above traffic impact and parking analysis, the applicant shall not be required to provide any mitigation measures as part of the proposed auto repair shop renovation and expansion project. __________________________________________________________________________ 22 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 68 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 APPENDIX A Weekday Intersection Turning Movement Traffic Counts ____________________________________________________________________________________ 23 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 69 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 APPENDIX B Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) and Level of Service (LOS) Worksheets ____________________________________________________________________________________ 24 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 70 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 APPENDIX C City of Hermosa Beach Parking Code Applicable Sections ____________________________________________________________________________________ 25 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 71 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.44 OFF-STREET PARKING 17.44. 010 Definitions. As used in this chapter: "Entrance-way" means an opening or passageway to a building or structure which permits pedestrian or vehicular access to such building or structure. "Gross floor area" means the total area occupied by a building or structure, excepting therefrom only the area of any inner open courts, corridors, open balconies (except when utilized, e.g. restaurant seating or similar usage), and open stairways. Such total area shall be calculated by measuring along the outside dimensions of the exterior surfaces of such building or structure. "Major city street" means all public rights-of-way designated in the circulation element of the general plan as a primary, or secondary arterials or as collectors. "Off-street parking" means parking upon private property as accessory to other permitted and uses, and shall not include publicly owned parking. "Tandem parking" means one automobile parked after or behind another in a lengthwise fashion. In this title, tandem parking is limited to not more than one automobile behind another. "Underground parking facilities" means a basement equipped, designed, used or intended to be used for parking automobiles. (Prior code Appx. A, § 1150) 17.44. 030 Off-street parking--Commercial and business uses. Required Number of Spaces by Use. The aggregate amount of off-street automobile parking spaces provided for various uses shall not be less than the following: A. Auditoriums for churches, theater, entertainment, sports and other places and rooms of public assembly for more than twenty (20) persons: one space for each five seats, permanent or removable, or one space for each fifty (50) square feet of gross floor area in the auditorium, whichever is greater. B. Automobile or boat sales: one space for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of site area. ____________________________________________________________________________________ 26 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 72 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 C. Bowling alleys: five spaces for each lane plus one space for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor area except bowling alley lanes and approach areas. D. Clubs, fraternity and sorority houses, rooming and boarding houses and similar uses having sleeping and guest rooms: two covered spaces for each three guest rooms: in dormitories each fifty (50) square feet shall be considered a guest room, two spaces shall be required for each guest room with kitchen facilities. E. Commercial Uses. 1. Bars and cocktail lounges: one space for each eighty (80) square feet of gross floor area. 2. Beauty colleges: one space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. 3. Business schools and trade schools: one space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. 4. Furniture and hardware stores: one space for each two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area. 5. Offices, general: one space for each two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area. 6. Offices, Governmental and Public Utilities. Government offices that generate high levels of contact with the public, or have high numbers of employees, including but not limited to employment offices, public social services offices, department of motor vehicle offices: one space per seventy-five (75) square feet of gross floor area for the first twenty-thousand (20,000) square feet of the building(s), plus one space per two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area for the remaining floor area. 7. Offices, medical: five spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area. 8. Restaurants (other than walk-up, drive-through and drive-in: one space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. 9. Restaurants, walk-up, drive-through and drive-in without adequate dining room facilities: one space for each fifty (50) square feet of gross floor area, but not less than ten spaces. 10. Retail, general retail commercial uses: one space for each two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area. 11. Gymnasiums/health and fitness centers, as follows: a. less than or equal to three thousand (3,000) square feet, and with less than or equal to twenty (20) students at one time if classes are offered: one space per two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area. b. greater than three thousand (3,000) square feet, or with more than ____________________________________________________________________________________ 27 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 73 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 twenty (20) students at one time if classes are offered: one space per one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. F. Hospitals: two spaces for each patient bed. G. Hospitals (mental), convalescent homes, guest homes, rest homes, sanitariums and similar institutions: one space for each three beds. H. Hotels: one space for each unit for the first fifty (50) units; one space per one and one-half units after fifty (50); and one space per two units after one hundred (100) units. Hotels with facilities including restaurants, banquet rooms, conference rooms, commercial retail uses and similar activities shall provide parking for the various uses as computed separately in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. I. Industrial Uses. The parking requirements of this subsection apply only to industrial uses; parking for commercial and other permitted uses in industrial zones shall provide the number of spaces as otherwise specified by this chapter. 1. Industrial uses of all types; except, public utility facilities and warehouses: one space for each vehicle used in conjunction with the use; plus one space for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor area. 2. Warehouses, buildings or portions of buildings used exclusively for warehouse purposes: one space for each one thousand (1,000) square feet for the first twenty thousand (20,000) square feet; plus, one space for each two thousand (2,000) square feet for the second twenty thousand (20,000) square feet; plus one space for each four thousand (4,000) square feet in excess of forty thousand (40,000) square feet; plus one space for each vehicle operated from the property. Prior to approval of a warehouse use by the city, a covenant shall be recorded, guaranteeing the warehouse area, facility or building will not be converted, remodeled or changed to a nonwarehouse use unless the number of spaces otherwise required by this chapter are secured and provided prior to such change or unless approved by planning commission in accordance with this chapter. J. Mobilehomes or trailer parks: two spaces for each dwelling unit with at least one space adjacent to the trailer site. K. Mortuaries or undertaking establishments: one space for each seventy-five (75) square feet of building area for the chapel or public assembly area. L. Motels: one space for each unit, plus two for the manager's unit. ____________________________________________________________________________________ 28 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 74 February4,2013 T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS&P ARKING S TUDY L EXOLOGY A UTO R EPAIR 1086A VIATION B OULEVARD&1111P ROSPECT A VENUE,H ERMOSA B EACH,CA90254 M. Recreation or amusement establishments: one space for each seventy-five (75) square feet of gross floor area. N. Service stations: one space for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of site area. O. Snack Bar/Snack Shop. The parking requirements for a snack bar and/or snack shop shall be the same as that for a restaurant, unless it can be shown to the Planning Commission that the characteristics of the building; its locations, size and other mitigating factors such as limited service area relative to gross floor area and limited seating capacity result in less parking demand than for a restaurant use. In these cases the Planning Commission may consider the retail commercial requirement for parking, pursuant to Section 17.44.210 Parking Plan. ____________________________________________________________________________________ 29 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 75 310.376.8418 APN 4186-001-001 & 002 LOT 1 & 2, TRACT 8519 SHEETSSHEETS California 90278Planning HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 SITE PLAN Redondo Beach,Interiors 1038 AVIATION BLVD & 1111 PROSPECT AVE, 732 SITE ANALYSIS SCALESCALESHEETSHEET 1902 Speyer LaneArchitecture DRAWNDRAWN JOB NO.JOB NO. 8-31-13 3/4/133/4/13 CHECKEDCHECKED Lexology Auto Repair 1"= 10'-0" DATE PRINTED Sept. 2012 tcetihcrA J redienhcS gerG A-1A-1 REVISIONS BY OFOF 15,584.00 SQ. FT. SQ. FT. 4,816.00 SQ. FT. 31.0 % 942.00 SQ. FT. 6.0 % 6,780.00 SQ. FT. 43.5 % 2,370.00 SQ. FT. 15.2 % 16 REQUIRED 18 1,811.00 SQ. FT. 2,985.00 SQ. FT. 2,970.00 SQ. FT. 2,723.00 SQ. FT 525.00 SQ. FT 9,203.00 SQ. FT. 235'-0"24'-0"C-3YESV -1hrB2010 CBC,CMC,CPC2010 T-24 ENERGY2010 CEC2010 CRC PRESENTATION SITE PLANARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN SHEET INDEXSHEET INDEX SHEET A-1 SHEET A-1.1 SURVEYSHEET A-2 SHEET A-3 ELEVATIONSSHEET A-3.1 ELEVATIONSSHEET S-1 FOUNDATION PLANSHEET L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN SITE ANALYSISSITE ANALYSIS LOT AREA =MAX ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE =EXISTING LOT COVERAGEEXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA =PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE =PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA =REQUIRED PARKING SPACES15,584.00 sq. ft. /1000 =PROPOSED PARKING SPACES =EXISTING TO BE DEMOLISHED BUILDING LOCATED ON PROSPECT AVE.EXISTING FLOOR AREA =NEW BUILDING PROPOSED FLOOR AREA SHOP #1EXISTING AREA =1,612.56 SQ. FT. + ADDITION 1,372.44 =PROPOSED ADDITION AREA TO SHOP #2 =PROPOSED NEW OFFICE SPACE =STRORAGE BASEMENT & RESTROOM = TOTAL AREA =NUMBER OF STORIESMAX BUILDING HEIGHTPROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHTZONEFIRE SPRINKLERSCONSTRUCTION TYPEOCCUPANCYCODE PROJECT DESCRIPTIONPROPOSED AUTO BODY SHOP DEMOLISHION OF BUILDING ON PROSPECT ADDITION TO EXISTING BUILDING #1 CONSTRUCTION OF NEW OFFICE BUILDING. ADDITION OF BUILDING #2 1 X T L 8 F 3 7 . 8 . 5 4 6 6 11 SET L&T RCE 308261.00' E'LY OF B.C.L&T ELEV = 167.63 L F 9 6 . 3 6 1 M 164.18 TX3 B 5SIGN . 9 5 8 .6 1 3 6 1 L F 1 6 0 4 . .0'167.49 BCR 0 .7 47SIGN 2 =6 6 R 1 1 ' 3 3 . 4 6 = L 1 3 .167.64 7 6 1 K SET L&T RCE 308261.00' W'LY OF B.C.ON A RADIAL LINEL&T ELEV = 162.11 L " 0 '- A 3 W E D I LANDSCAPE AREA S SIG BOX E T E R 18" HI PLANTER WALL C N 2 R4 O . C9' C A 2 0 B8 .N 8 6 7 802 E 6 811 0' ...1 R0 12 5 4 63 66 0 111 A . 8 76 161.41 FL 4TREE168.26 TC 6 E 01 ." 2 0 P - 6 AREA' 1 5 A 168.32 3 ' CAR WASH C 7' 0 8" PALM ONE STORY 9 S 4 . D 2168.35 BASEMENT FF EL= 160.001st FF EL= 169.002nd FF EL= 179.00 OFFICE BUILDING 8 N 3 A = WV L 3" TREE R 9 4 . 7 6 WM3 51 . 48" TREE 6 1 2' 2 .7 81 6 . 1 8 8 = 168.65 L E X T 6 8 . 8 U 6 " 0 - '1 5 168.22 FL 1 2 2 .N 2 6 1 SIGN 169.02 E CONCRETE SIDEWALK " SHOP #2 0 -SITE PLAN ' FF LE = 160.00 CAR REPAIR" 29 V / 1 91 - ' 5 8" PALM A 7 1 1 . 8 1 5 .6' 01 9 6 T " 1 7 0 . - ' 9 0 3 8 4 7 E 2 C 4 .LANDSCAPE PLANTER 0 T E 6 Y " 1 E " 0 -A9 ' 9 R 169.11 TX 1 ' W E C 2 E N GW 3 V ° "I 8 0 O - ' 1 8 7 .R C 169.19 TC 00 EXISTING RETAINING WALL 1 P %2 D 6 . 13 0 3 N 7 9. 513.62'" 88 0 1 - . ' 9 0 P )C P 6 Y T S M(T 1 A 8 2 R B.C. ESTAB. PER TIES 169.35. 168.70 FL9 6 1 O SIGN 7169.51 4 0 2 . .1 0 0 3 6.R 6 19 1 6 N 47°49'44"E154.51' 1 8 6 . 0 379.75'P 3'-1" 6 1 PAVING SIGN 5 91 CONCRETE . 4 169.49 1. 00 8 9 88 04 ..66 .2 .168.76 N 47°49'44"E 01 91 PP00 S6 5 6 TRASHTRASH 6 1 T 11 PARKING SPACES 1 UP 3 6'-1/2" 4 . 9 5 1 X159.24 FL 8" PALM T 9 13'-6" 0 . 9SECURITY GATE 5 W 1 4 T 912'-5 1/2" 3 .' 916 947 L1 5 .9 4 F14 9.. SECURITY GATE 65 0582 4 61 7 .6 8 8. 1 Y L&T NOTAG 9169.48 5 8 15 A 0 .1 K 9 W E 5 "L 1 0 K 0 A 2 8'-8" HI RET. WALL9 ' . R 92 W 169.59 53 A E 1° P 7 D 151 I Y 169.45 S N T 8" TREE T I E& AVIATION BOULEVARD C L TY C T EA D 9 9 R 3 W.5 F . WM169.52 9 A C 9 6169.09 FL 6 E K 1 O N 1 R T R 30'-0"A O PAVING A E C P DRIVEWAY P 9 CONCRETE A 14WM C Y 7 S T 8 I D SLOPE 3% 10 N11 C A12 L 2169.72 2 . 9 L5 F1 LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE 08 62 .. 78 55 8" TREE 11 13 X 4 7 T 1 2 . .9 3 7 9 9. 1 169.28 FL9 5. 5 6 METAL SECURITY FENCE 6' HI 19169.76 11 5 1 169.77 2169.36 169.000170.22 . 9 9 METAL SECURITY GATE 6' HI6 5 1 .1 88 LANDSCAPE AREA . 5 9 2 1 6 8'-0" 4 351.170.01 9170.42 5 80 ..8 6 .'79.7W"00'41°24 N78" TREE OIL8 9 7 5'-0"1170.22 56 RESTROOM 6 151 169.97 1 9 . 4 8W 85 .6T 3 18 8 .52 . 56 34 8 8.2 1 6. 66 2 10 .17 7 1 3 1 170.00 6 1 " /2 1 1 '- 8 " 40' 7 - ' 1 4 ' 6 6 . 1 4 8 0' 5 E A 3" . 90 E 5 1 ' 1 R 3 40'-1" A 3 ° 1 LANDSCAPE PLANTERE 3 P ADDITION TO SHOP N LINE OF ADDION A C 2,985.00 SQ. FT.SET L&T RCE 3082613.00' E'LY OF CORNERON PROP. LINE PROD.L&T ELEV = 170.00 3'-1 1/2" CAR REPAIR SSET L&T RCE 30826ON TOP OF BLOCK WALLON PROPERTY CORNERL&T ELEV = 169.85 FF EL= 158.35 D 19'-0" N A EXISTING BUILDING #1 L X T 3W 6"3-'52 8 6T . . 6 67 58 5 . 1 1 9 7 6 8 181 . 17 L6F F F5 10'-6" 410 1 4 1 .. 056 .8 6 63 585 57.. 15 13193 . . 156 7 8 11 5 5 1 1 SIG BOX 6 5 .5 N 42°14'00"W79.65' 4 60 .8 51 . 74 1. 7 5 57 115 1 BUILDING TO FD SPK BUILDING IS 0.14' W'LYOF W'LY PROPERTY LINE BUILDING IS ON PROPERTY LINE BUILDING IS 1.23' W'LYOF W'LY PROPERTY LINE EXISTING COMMERCIAL SET L&T RCE 30826ON TOP OF BLOCK WALL2.00' W'LY OF CORNERON PROPERTY LINEL&T ELEV = 167.21 SET L&T RCE 308261.00' W'LY OF CORNERON PROP. LINE PRODL&T ELEV = 156.60 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffic Engineering - ITS - Transportation Planning Agency:File Name: 1_ProspectAv_AviationBl 18662 MacArthur Boulevard, Ste. 435, Irvine, CA 92612 City of Hermosa Beach, CASite Code: 001 Ph: (949) 727-3399 - Web: minagarinc.com Start Date: 1/30/2013 Page No: 1 Groups Printed- All Vehicles - Group 1 Aviation Blvd.Aviation Blvd.Prospect Ave.Prospect Ave. EastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Int. Total Start TimeLeftThruRightPedsLeftThruRightPedsLeftThruRightPedsLeftThruRightPeds 07:00 AM3261542814352431781101480597 07:15 AM438241501755432339848481813 07:30 AM92631217222074348011213122285874 07:45 AM28275375121112343162158122156911052 Total441181241320174929131133064463051963373336 08:00 AM422392945206183371531464510301571007 08:15 AM22211902621319024166112121749250905 08:30 AM15301154481972439102127181347319972 08:45 AM42559135201213281038033172172865 Total83100635141548176010128524465787119888183749 ***BREAK*** 04:00 PM2827422511833143235765619731801046 04:15 PM233121851133151248566113531081201113 04:30 PM1932228101123981136177260964952271282 04:45 PM32971911116435151019455910199517121182 Total731205873145914794253672302453815537169194623 05:00 PM4132130171243331632254406301142591185 05:15 PM183504281293941062575629421372351335 05:30 PM17354331010327521715596014501381701173 05:45 PM172872110125293711244055220871351017 Total9313121264548112955427862282173114247678194710 Grand Total2934704272103129543401851033941288137317741911412686316418 Apprch %5.587.65.11.921.973.33.11.712.239.942.55.522.260.314.23.3 Total %1.828.71.70.67.926.41.10.62.47.88.41.12.66.91.60.4 All Vehicles2934704272103129543401851033941288137317741911412686316418 % All Vehicles 100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100 Group 100000000000000000 % Group 100000000000000000 77 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffic Engineering - ITS - Transportation Planning Bhfodz;Gjmf!Obnf;!2`QsptqfduBw`BwjbujpoCm 18662 MacArthur Boulevard, Ste. 435, Irvine, CA 92612 Djuz!pg!Ifsnptb!Cfbdi-!DBTjuf!Dpef;!112 Ph: (949) 727-3399 - Web: minagarinc.com Tubsu!Ebuf;!204103124 Qbhf!Op;!3 78 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffic Engineering - ITS - Transportation Planning Bhfodz;Gjmf!Obnf;!2`QsptqfduBw`BwjbujpoCm 18662 MacArthur Boulevard, Ste. 435, Irvine, CA 92612 Djuz!pg!Ifsnptb!Cfbdi-!DBTjuf!Dpef;!112 Ph: (949) 727-3399 - Web: minagarinc.com Tubsu!Ebuf;!204103124 Qbhf!Op;!4 Aviation Blvd.Aviation Blvd.Prospect Ave.Prospect Ave. EastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound ThrRigPedThrRigPedThrRigPedInt. Thru Start Time Left RightPeds LeftLeftLeft App. TotalApp. TotalApp. TotalApp. Total uhtsuhtsuhtsTotal Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 512774315821561052 07:45 AM2827537313211123162123759187 08:00 AM 42 2392 9 2924520618327237153146 45381 1030157621007 21319166 08:15 AM22211902422602582411212314174925091905 08:30 AM15 30115 4 335 481972 4 25139102127182861347 319100 972 Total Volume 107 1026 29201182170827511010581435835438713566118280173403936 % App. Total 9.1 86.82.51.7 16.178.24.80.9 10.543406.4 17.953.523.55 PHF.882.955.890.850.935 .637.852.483.556.833.971.671.625.831.878.859.483.726.813.645.472 Prospect Ave. OutInTotal 741 340 1081 80 182 61 17 RightThruLeftPeds Peak Hour Data Right 1630 Out 51 107 2232 Left Total Aviation Blvd. Thru North 827 1026 1058 Thru In In 1182 Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM Left 170 29 All Vehicles Right Aviation Blvd. Total 2688 Group 1 Peds Out 1050 20 10 Peds LeftThruRightPeds 143 583 543 87 381 1356 1737 OutInTotal Prospect Ave. 79 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffic Engineering - ITS - Transportation Planning Bhfodz;Gjmf!Obnf;!2`QsptqfduBw`BwjbujpoCm 18662 MacArthur Boulevard, Ste. 435, Irvine, CA 92612 Djuz!pg!Ifsnptb!Cfbdi-!DBTjuf!Dpef;!112 Ph: (949) 727-3399 - Web: minagarinc.com Tubsu!Ebuf;!204103124 Qbhf!Op;!5 Aviation Blvd.Aviation Blvd.Prospect Ave.Prospect Ave. EastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthbound Start Thru RightPeds Left Thru RightPeds Left Thru RightPeds Left Thru RightPeds Left App. TotalApp. TotalApp. TotalApp. Total Int. Total Time Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM19322281037911239811 36 5571772609158 64 952271881282 4355761012 04:45 PM3297191133011615101945591331995171431182 05:00 PM 41 32130 17 409124333 16 3476225440612230114 25 91781185 350424181292575621711372071335 05:15 PM188394106539942235 Total Volume 81 1290 119461536481 1560 52552148832462213458415544187337164984 2.42.6 5.8 4.6 % App. Total 5.3847.73 22.472.614.242.137.821.661.612.2 PHF.494.921.708.676.919.932.897.813.382.932.830.820.891.850.854.605.805.870.688.865.933 Prospect Ave. OutInTotal 379 716 1095 87 441 155 33 RightThruLeftPeds Peak Hour Data Right 81 1666 Out 52 3266 Left Total Aviation Blvd. Thru North 1560 1290 2148 Thru In In 1536 Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM Left 481 119 All Vehicles Right Aviation Blvd. Total 3814 Group 1 Peds Out1730 46 55 Peds LeftThruRightPeds 83 246 221 34 1041 584 1625 OutInTotal Prospect Ave. 80 Synchro 8 Intersection LOS Report1: Aviation Blvd. & Prospect Ave. AM Pk Hr (7:45-8:45AM) Intersection Capacity Utilization MovementNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBRNELNETNERSWLSWTSWR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)143583543611828010710262917082751 Pedestrians178787172010 Ped ButtonNoNoNoNo Pedestrian Timing (s)16.016.016.016.0 Free RightNoNoYesNo Ideal Flow190019001900190019001900190019001900190019001900 Lost Time (s)4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 Minimum Green (s)4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 Refr Cycle Length (s)120120120120120120120120120120120120 Volume Combined (vph)143583543611828010710262917082751 Lane Utilization Factor1.001.001.001.001.001.001.000.951.001.001.001.00 Turning Factor (vph)0.951.000.850.951.000.850.951.000.850.951.000.85 Saturated Flow (vph)180519001615180519001615180536181615180519001615 Ped Intf Time (s)0.00.06.70.00.02.00.00.02.30.00.01.2 Pedestrian Frequency (%)1.001.001.001.00 Protected Option AllowedYesYesYesYes Reference Time (s)9.536.847.04.111.58.07.134.04.511.352.25.0 Adj Reference Time (s)13.540.851.08.120.020.011.138.020.015.356.220.0 Permitted Option Adj Saturation A (vph)1201900120190012018091201900 Reference Time A (s)142.636.860.811.5106.734.0169.552.2 Adj Saturation B (vphNANANANANANANANA Reference Time B (s)NANANANANANANANA Reference Time (s)142.660.8106.7169.5 Adj Reference Time (s)146.664.8110.7173.5 Split Option Ref Time Combined (s)9.536.84.111.57.134.011.352.2 Ref Time Seperate (s)9.536.84.111.57.134.011.352.2 Reference Time (s)36.836.811.511.534.034.052.252.2 Adj Reference Time (s)40.840.820.020.038.038.056.256.2 SummaryNB SBNE SWCombined Protected Option (s)48.967.3 Permitted Option (s)146.6173.5 Split Option (s)60.894.3 Minimum (s)48.967.3116.2 Right TurnsNBRSBRNERSWR Adj Reference Time (s)51.020.020.020.0 Cross Thru Ref Time (s)38.056.20.040.8 Oncoming Left Ref Time (s)8.113.50.011.1 Combined (s)97.189.720.071.9 Intersection Summary Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.9%ICU Level of Service F Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan. MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.TIA & Pkg Study for Lexology Auto Care 2/4/2013City of Hermosa Beach, CA 81 Synchro 8 Intersection LOS Report1: Aviation Blvd. & Prospect Ave. PM Pk Hr (4:30-5:30PM) Intersection Capacity Utilization MovementNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBRNELNETNERSWLSWTSWR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)8324622115544187811290119481156052 Pedestrians333434334652 Ped ButtonNoNoNoNo Pedestrian Timing (s)16.016.016.016.0 Free RightNoNoYesNo Ideal Flow190019001900190019001900190019001900190019001900 Lost Time (s)4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 Minimum Green (s)4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 Refr Cycle Length (s)120120120120120120120120120120120120 Volume Combined (vph)8324622115544187811290119481156052 Lane Utilization Factor1.001.001.001.001.001.001.000.951.001.001.001.00 Turning Factor (vph)0.951.000.850.951.000.850.951.000.850.951.000.85 Saturated Flow (vph)180519001615180519001615180536181615180519001615 Ped Intf Time (s)0.00.03.60.00.03.50.00.04.50.00.04.9 Pedestrian Frequency (%)1.001.001.001.00 Protected Option AllowedYesYesYesYes Reference Time (s)5.515.520.010.327.910.05.442.813.332.098.58.8 Adj Reference Time (s)9.520.024.014.331.920.09.446.820.036.0102.520.0 Permitted Option Adj Saturation A (vph)1201900120190012018091201900 Reference Time A (s)82.815.5154.627.980.842.8479.798.5 Adj Saturation B (vphNANANANANANANANA Reference Time B (s)NANANANANANANANA Reference Time (s)82.8154.680.8479.7 Adj Reference Time (s)86.8158.684.8483.7 Split Option Ref Time Combined (s)5.515.510.327.95.442.832.098.5 Ref Time Seperate (s)5.515.510.327.95.442.832.098.5 Reference Time (s)15.515.527.927.942.842.898.598.5 Adj Reference Time (s)20.020.031.931.946.846.8102.5102.5 SummaryNB SBNE SWCombined Protected Option (s)41.4111.9 Permitted Option (s)158.6483.7 Split Option (s)51.9149.3 Minimum (s)41.4111.9153.3 Right TurnsNBRSBRNERSWR Adj Reference Time (s)24.020.020.020.0 Cross Thru Ref Time (s)46.8102.50.020.0 Oncoming Left Ref Time (s)14.39.50.09.4 Combined (s)85.1132.020.049.4 Intersection Summary Intersection Capacity Utilization 127.7%ICU Level of Service H Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan. MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.TIA & Pkg Study for Lexology Auto Care 2/4/2013City of Hermosa Beach, CA 82 Synchro 8 Intersection LOS Report1: Aviation Blvd. & Prospect Ave. Ex+Project (AM Pk Hr) Intersection Capacity Utilization MovementNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBRNELNETNERSWLSWTSWR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)143583544611838110810283217383151 Pedestrians178787172010 Ped ButtonNoNoNoNo Pedestrian Timing (s)16.016.016.016.0 Free RightNoNoYesNo Ideal Flow190019001900190019001900190019001900190019001900 Lost Time (s)4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 Minimum Green (s)4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 Refr Cycle Length (s)120120120120120120120120120120120120 Volume Combined (vph)143583544611838110810283217383151 Lane Utilization Factor1.001.001.001.001.001.001.000.951.001.001.001.00 Turning Factor (vph)0.951.000.850.951.000.850.951.000.850.951.000.85 Saturated Flow (vph)180519001615180519001615180536181615180519001615 Ped Intf Time (s)0.00.06.70.00.02.00.00.02.30.00.01.2 Pedestrian Frequency (%)1.001.001.001.00 Protected Option AllowedYesYesYesYes Reference Time (s)9.536.847.14.111.68.07.234.14.711.552.55.0 Adj Reference Time (s)13.540.851.18.120.020.011.238.120.015.556.520.0 Permitted Option Adj Saturation A (vph)1201900120190012018091201900 Reference Time A (s)142.636.860.811.6107.734.1172.552.5 Adj Saturation B (vphNANANANANANANANA Reference Time B (s)NANANANANANANANA Reference Time (s)142.660.8107.7172.5 Adj Reference Time (s)146.664.8111.7176.5 Split Option Ref Time Combined (s)9.536.84.111.67.234.111.552.5 Ref Time Seperate (s)9.536.84.111.67.234.111.552.5 Reference Time (s)36.836.811.611.634.134.152.552.5 Adj Reference Time (s)40.840.820.020.038.138.156.556.5 SummaryNB SBNE SWCombined Protected Option (s)48.967.7 Permitted Option (s)146.6176.5 Split Option (s)60.894.6 Minimum (s)48.967.7116.5 Right TurnsNBRSBRNERSWR Adj Reference Time (s)51.120.020.020.0 Cross Thru Ref Time (s)38.156.50.040.8 Oncoming Left Ref Time (s)8.113.50.011.2 Combined (s)97.390.020.072.0 Intersection Summary Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.1%ICU Level of Service F Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan. MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.TIA & Pkg Study for Lexology Auto Care 2/4/2013City of Hermosa Beach, CA 83 Synchro 8 Intersection LOS Report1: Aviation Blvd. & Prospect Ave. Ex+Project (PM Pk Hr) Intersection Capacity Utilization MovementNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBRNELNETNERSWLSWTSWR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)8324722415544288821293124483156352 Pedestrians333434334652 Ped ButtonNoNoNoNo Pedestrian Timing (s)16.016.016.016.0 Free RightNoNoYesNo Ideal Flow190019001900190019001900190019001900190019001900 Lost Time (s)4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 Minimum Green (s)4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 Refr Cycle Length (s)120120120120120120120120120120120120 Volume Combined (vph)8324722415544288821293124483156352 Lane Utilization Factor1.001.001.001.001.001.001.000.951.001.001.001.00 Turning Factor (vph)0.951.000.850.951.000.850.951.000.850.951.000.85 Saturated Flow (vph)180519001615180519001615180536181615180519001615 Ped Intf Time (s)0.00.03.60.00.03.50.00.04.50.00.04.9 Pedestrian Frequency (%)1.001.001.001.00 Protected Option AllowedYesYesYesYes Reference Time (s)5.515.620.210.327.910.05.542.913.732.198.78.8 Adj Reference Time (s)9.520.024.214.331.920.09.546.920.036.1102.720.0 Permitted Option Adj Saturation A (vph)1201900120190012018091201900 Reference Time A (s)82.815.6154.627.981.842.9481.798.7 Adj Saturation B (vphNANANANANANANANA Reference Time B (s)NANANANANANANANA Reference Time (s)82.8154.681.8481.7 Adj Reference Time (s)86.8158.685.8485.7 Split Option Ref Time Combined (s)5.515.610.327.95.542.932.198.7 Ref Time Seperate (s)5.515.610.327.95.542.932.198.7 Reference Time (s)15.615.627.927.942.942.998.798.7 Adj Reference Time (s)20.020.031.931.946.946.9102.7102.7 SummaryNB SBNE SWCombined Protected Option (s)41.4112.2 Permitted Option (s)158.6485.7 Split Option (s)51.9149.6 Minimum (s)41.4112.2153.6 Right TurnsNBRSBRNERSWR Adj Reference Time (s)24.220.020.020.0 Cross Thru Ref Time (s)46.9102.70.020.0 Oncoming Left Ref Time (s)14.39.50.09.5 Combined (s)85.4132.220.049.5 Intersection Summary Intersection Capacity Utilization 128.0%ICU Level of Service H Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan. MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.TIA & Pkg Study for Lexology Auto Care 2/4/2013City of Hermosa Beach, CA 84 Synchro 8 Intersection LOS Report1: Aviation Blvd. & Prospect Ave. Cu+Project (AM Pk Hr) Intersection Capacity Utilization MovementNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBRNELNETNERSWLSWTSWR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)143584545611838110810303217383351 Pedestrians178787172010 Ped ButtonNoNoNoNo Pedestrian Timing (s)16.016.016.016.0 Free RightNoNoYesNo Ideal Flow190019001900190019001900190019001900190019001900 Lost Time (s)4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 Minimum Green (s)4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 Refr Cycle Length (s)120120120120120120120120120120120120 Volume Combined (vph)143584545611838110810303217383351 Lane Utilization Factor1.001.001.001.001.001.001.000.951.001.001.001.00 Turning Factor (vph)0.951.000.850.951.000.850.951.000.850.951.000.85 Saturated Flow (vph)180519001615180519001615180536181615180519001615 Ped Intf Time (s)0.00.06.70.00.02.00.00.02.30.00.01.2 Pedestrian Frequency (%)1.001.001.001.00 Protected Option AllowedYesYesYesYes Reference Time (s)9.536.947.24.111.68.07.234.24.711.552.65.0 Adj Reference Time (s)13.540.951.28.120.020.011.238.220.015.556.620.0 Permitted Option Adj Saturation A (vph)1201900120190012018091201900 Reference Time A (s)142.636.960.811.6107.734.2172.552.6 Adj Saturation B (vphNANANANANANANANA Reference Time B (s)NANANANANANANANA Reference Time (s)142.660.8107.7172.5 Adj Reference Time (s)146.664.8111.7176.5 Split Option Ref Time Combined (s)9.536.94.111.67.234.211.552.6 Ref Time Seperate (s)9.536.94.111.67.234.211.552.6 Reference Time (s)36.936.911.611.634.234.252.652.6 Adj Reference Time (s)40.940.920.020.038.238.256.656.6 SummaryNB SBNE SWCombined Protected Option (s)48.967.8 Permitted Option (s)146.6176.5 Split Option (s)60.994.8 Minimum (s)48.967.8116.7 Right TurnsNBRSBRNERSWR Adj Reference Time (s)51.220.020.020.0 Cross Thru Ref Time (s)38.256.60.040.9 Oncoming Left Ref Time (s)8.113.50.011.2 Combined (s)97.490.120.072.1 Intersection Summary Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.3%ICU Level of Service F Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan. MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.TIA & Pkg Study for Lexology Auto Care 2/4/2013City of Hermosa Beach, CA 85 Synchro 8 Intersection LOS Report1: Aviation Blvd. & Prospect Ave. Cu+Project (PM Pk Hr) Intersection Capacity Utilization MovementNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBRNELNETNERSWLSWTSWR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)8324822415544288821296124484156652 Pedestrians333434334652 Ped ButtonNoNoNoNo Pedestrian Timing (s)16.016.016.016.0 Free RightNoNoYesNo Ideal Flow190019001900190019001900190019001900190019001900 Lost Time (s)4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 Minimum Green (s)4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 Refr Cycle Length (s)120120120120120120120120120120120120 Volume Combined (vph)8324822415544288821296124484156652 Lane Utilization Factor1.001.001.001.001.001.001.000.951.001.001.001.00 Turning Factor (vph)0.951.000.850.951.000.850.951.000.850.951.000.85 Saturated Flow (vph)180519001615180519001615180536181615180519001615 Ped Intf Time (s)0.00.03.60.00.03.50.00.04.50.00.04.9 Pedestrian Frequency (%)1.001.001.001.00 Protected Option AllowedYesYesYesYes Reference Time (s)5.515.720.210.327.910.05.543.013.732.298.98.8 Adj Reference Time (s)9.520.024.214.331.920.09.547.020.036.2102.920.0 Permitted Option Adj Saturation A (vph)1201900120190012018091201900 Reference Time A (s)82.815.7154.627.981.843.0482.798.9 Adj Saturation B (vphNANANANANANANANA Reference Time B (s)NANANANANANANANA Reference Time (s)82.8154.681.8482.7 Adj Reference Time (s)86.8158.685.8486.7 Split Option Ref Time Combined (s)5.515.710.327.95.543.032.298.9 Ref Time Seperate (s)5.515.710.327.95.543.032.298.9 Reference Time (s)15.715.727.927.943.043.098.998.9 Adj Reference Time (s)20.020.031.931.947.047.0102.9102.9 SummaryNB SBNE SWCombined Protected Option (s)41.4112.4 Permitted Option (s)158.6486.7 Split Option (s)51.9149.9 Minimum (s)41.4112.4153.8 Right TurnsNBRSBRNERSWR Adj Reference Time (s)24.220.020.020.0 Cross Thru Ref Time (s)47.0102.90.020.0 Oncoming Left Ref Time (s)14.39.50.09.5 Combined (s)85.5132.420.049.5 Intersection Summary Intersection Capacity Utilization 128.2%ICU Level of Service H Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan. MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.TIA & Pkg Study for Lexology Auto Care 2/4/2013City of Hermosa Beach, CA 86 From: Jennifer Scarlett Buchsbaum \[mailto:jlsca73@me.com\] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 6:55 PM To: Ken Robertson Subject: Comments re: 1111 Prospect Ave Hello Ken, I hope you are doing well. I wanted to share my thoughts on a pending building permit for 1111 Prospect Ave. My understanding is that the new property owners would like to demolish the building and rebuild a used car lot and car repair facility. I have a few concerns about this plan. They are: 1. Hermosa Beach already has many used car lots and repair facilities. Do we really need more? 2. This property is in a highly trafficked residential neighborhood with lots of families. I would think there are other business types that could open there and prosper that would better serve the surrounding community. Being that we are only beginning to work on the economic development plans for Hermosa via the PCH/Aviation Commission as well as the plans suggested by the Friends of Hermosa ED group, it would be nice to table this permit application until more discussion can take place. Perhaps we can meet with the property owner to discuss some of the concerns and needs of the surrounding community? 3. The Prospect/Aviation intersection is one of the major entryways into Hermosa Beach giving travelers a first impression of what Hermosa Beach is like. Do we think a used car lot is the best first impression to give visitors? Thank you for taking the time to share my comments with the planning commission. I'm sorry that I am not able to be there in person Tuesday night for the discussion. I look forward to hearing the outcome. Sincerely, Kfoojgfs!Cvditcbvn! 2635!Qsptqfdu!Bwf! Ifsnptb!Cfbdi! 310.480.4919 Supplemental Information 6 421/487/9529 BQO!5297.112.112!'!113 MPU!2!'!3-!USBDU!962: Dbmjgpsojb!:1389Qmboojoh IFSNPTB!CFBDI-!DB!:1365 TJUF!QMBO Sfepoep!Cfbdi-Joufsjpst 2149!BWJBUJPO!CMWE!'!2222!QSPTQFDU!BWF- TJUF!BOBMZTJT 2:13!Tqfzfs!MbofBsdijufduvsf Mfypmphz!Bvup!Sfqbjs udfujidsBsfejfoidThfsH ( 272/52!GM 4(.2# 24(.7# 27:/11 MBOETDBQF!BSFB 281/53 87 (8:/X#11(52¢35!O 51( 9!1( 4(.2!203# 2:(.1# #4.(63 O!53¢25(11#X8:/76( 421/487/9529 BQO!5297.112.112!'!113 MPU!2!'!3-!USBDU!962: Dbmjgpsojb!:1389Qmboojoh IFSNPTB!CFBDI-!DB!:1365 TVSWFZ Sfepoep!Cfbdi-Joufsjpst 2149!BWJBUJPO!CMWE!'!2222!QSPTQFDU!BWF- 2:13!Tqfzfs!MbofBsdijufduvsf Mfypmphz!Bvup!Cpez udfujidsBsfejfoidThfsH ( 272/52!GM 27:/11 281/53 (8:/87X#11(52¢35!O 51( 9!1( O!53¢25(11#X8:/76( 421/487/9529 BQO!5297.112.112!'!113 MPU!2!'!3-!USBDU!962: Dbmjgpsojb!:1389Qmboojoh IFSNPTB!CFBDI-!DB!:1365 QBSLJOH!QMBO Sfepoep!Cfbdi-Joufsjpst 2149!BWJBUJPO!CMWE!'!2222!QSPTQFDU!BWF- 2:13!Tqfzfs!MbofBsdijufduvsf Mfypmphz!Bvup!Sfqbjs udfujidsBsfejfoidThfsH 2:(.1# 4(.2# 2:(.1# MBOETDBQF!BSFB 51( 2:(.1# 9!1( 4(.2!203# 2:(.1# 2:(.1# #4.(63 421/487/9529 BQO!5297.112.112!'!113 MPU!2!'!3-!USBDU!962: Dbmjgpsojb!:1389Qmboojoh IFSNPTB!CFBDI-!DB!:1365 GJSTU!GMPPS!QMBO Sfepoep!Cfbdi-Joufsjpst 2149!BWJBUJPO!CMWE!'!2222!QSPTQFDU!BWF- 2:13!Tqfzfs!MbofBsdijufduvsf Mfypmphz!Bvup!Sfqbjs udfujidsBsfejfoidThfsH 2(.1# 4(.1# 24(.7# #22.(56 25(.:#203# 7(.1# QSPQFSUZ!MJOF QSPQFSUZ!MJOF 2(.1# 4(.1##302!9.(87 9(.22# 421/487/9529 BQO!5297.112.112!'!113 MPU!2!'!3-!USBDU!962: Dbmjgpsojb!:1389Qmboojoh IFSNPTB!CFBDI-!DB!:1365 3OE!GMPPS!QMBO Sfepoep!Cfbdi-Joufsjpst 2149!BWJBUJPO!CMWE!'!2222!QSPTQFDU!BWF- 2:13!Tqfzfs!MbofBsdijufduvsf Mfypmphz!Bvup!Sfqbjs udfujidsB!!!!!!!sfejfoidT!!hfsH 3:(.5#23(.22# 78(.9# 421/487/9529 BQO!5297.112.112!'!113 MPU!2!'!3-!USBDU!962: Dbmjgpsojb!:1389Qmboojoh IFSNPTB!CFBDI-!DB!:1365 FYJTU(H!GMPPS!QMBO!0!FMFW Sfepoep!Cfbdi-Joufsjpst 2149!BWJBUJPO!CMWE!'!2222!QSPTQFDU!BWF- 2:13!Tqfzfs!MbofBsdijufduvsf Mfypmphz!Bvup!Cpez udfujidsBsfejfoidThfsH 33(.203#23(.21!203# 7(.8# QSPQFSUZ!MJOF QSPQFSUZ!MJOF 6(.1#56(.22#56(.22# 421/487/9529 BQO!5297.112.112!'!113 MPU!2!'!3-!USBDU!962: Dbmjgpsojb!:1389Qmboojoh IFSNPTB!CFBDI-!DB!:1365 FMFWBUJPOT Sfepoep!Cfbdi-Joufsjpst 2149!BWJBUJPO!CMWE!'!2222!QSPTQFDU!BWF- 2:13!Tqfzfs!MbofBsdijufduvsf Mfypmphz!Bvup!Sfqbjs udfujidsB!!!!!!!sfejfoidT!!hfsH 27(.1# 27(.1# :(.1# 9(.1# :(.1#21(.21!203# 27(.1# :(.1# 22(.4# ???????????? ??? ???????????? ? ??? ??? ? ? ?? ????? ???? ?????????? ????????????? ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ???? ??????? ??????????????? ???? ???????? ???? ? ???? ???????? ???? ???? ?????? ???????????????? ???????? ???? ?????? udfujidsB!!!!!!!sfejfoidT!!hfsH F JO !M Z U FS Q P S Q 3 2 !; /6 3 F Q P M T TMPQF 203;23 FQPMT 3230;2 3(.1# HVUUFS MJOF!PG!SPPG!PWFSIBOH MJOF!PG!CVJMEJOH MJOF!PG!CVJMEJOH MJOF!PG!SPPG!PWFSIBOH 4(.7# TMPQF TMPQF 3/6!;233/6!;23 3 2 3; 0 2 F Q P M T MJOF!PG!SPPG!PWFSIBOH MJOF!PG!CVJMEJOH QSPQFSUZ!MJOF MJOF!PG!CVJMEJOH MJOF!PG!SPPG!PWFSIBOH HVUUFS 3(.1# TMPQF SJEHF 2;23 QSPQFSUZ!MJOF 6 LDM ENM 0012-03 09-17-12 AS NOTED HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA HERMOSA BEACH, CA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA BOUTIQUE HOTEL HOTEL, LLC PROECT DATA 310-377-7873 VOICE HERMOSA website: envirotechno.com HERMOSA BOUTIQUE COVER SHEET - e-mail: luis@envirotechno.com LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066 CLIENT NAME:PROJECT TITLE: 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 404 SHEET TITLE: JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET NO: COVER SHEET - PROECT DATASURVESURVEFLOOR AREA ANALSISSITE PLANROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLANMIDDLE LEVEL FLOOR PLANUPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLANROOF LEVEL PLANSOUTH ELEVATION AND EAST ELEVATIONNORTH ELEVATION AND EST ELEVATIONUILDIN SECTIONSSOUTH LIHTIN ELEVATION EAST LIHTIN ELEVATIONNORTH LIHTIN ELEVATION EST LIHTIN ELEVATIONPRELIMINAR ROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLANPRELIMINAR MIDDLE LEVEL FLOOR PLANPRELIMINAR UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN CS10C1C210A10A11A12A13A14A21A22A31LT21LT22LP1LP2LP3 SHEET INDE 2 22302030 IN ROOM: DOULE ROOM: COMPACT SPACES: STANDARD SPACES: ACCESSILE SPACES: TOTAL OF 30 UEST ROOMS 10 DOULE, 20 IN SIE PROPOSED PROECT IS A 3 THREE STOR OUTIUEHOTEL ROUND LEVEL/ ARAE2 STORIES HAVIN AUEST ROOM IT INCLUDES MULTI-FUNCTION ROOM, M,SPA, ITH MULTIPLE OUTDOOR SITTIN AREAS 11,1 SFT S FT LOT SIE ASED UPON SURVE PREPARED DC ENINEERIN, INC - UNE 2012 TOTAL NUMER OF UEST ROOMS: TOTAL NUMER OF PARIN SPACES: LOT SIE: PROECT SCOPE: NUMER OF UEST ROOMS:PARIN 1 PER UESTROOM: 383 SQ. FT.448 SQ. FT. 2,777 SQ. FT.7,560 SQ. FT.1,155 SQ. FT.5,731 SQ. FT.6,886 SQ. FT.1,148 SQ. FT.1,126 SQ. FT.9,543 SQ. FT.1,137 SQ. FT.5,434 SQ. FT.6,571 SQ. FT.1,218 SQ. FT.1,069 SQ. FT.1,126 SQ. FT.9,664 SQ. FT.9,166 SQ. FT.458.3 SQ. FT. 10,337 SQ. FT.29,544 SQ. FT. 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE ROOF AREA: GARAGE AREA: HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA BALCONY AREA:BALCONY AREA: OUTDOOR AREA:OUTDOOR AREA: CORRIDOR AREA:CORRIDOR AREA: GUEST ROOM AREA:GUEST ROOM AREA: 5% MAX. AREA MECH. EQUIP.: COMMERCIAL/COMMON AREA:COMMERCIAL/COMMON AREA:COMMERCIAL/COMMON AREA: TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AREA: MIDDLE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AREA: GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AREA: PROPOSED MECHANICAL EQUIP. AREA: TOTAL UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AREA: TOTAL MIDDLE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AREA: UILDIN AREA: PROECT DESCRIPTION HERMOSA BOUTIQUE HOTEL RAU CHHARIA RHAVI HOSLAHERMOSA OUTIUE HOTEL, LLCEMAIL: r 20 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201HERMOSA EACH, CALIFORNIA ENVIROTECHNO ARCHITECTURELOS ANELES, CALIFORNIA 00CONTACT: MR LUIS DE MORAES, AIA VOICE: 310 3-3HERMOSA EACH, CALIFORNIA 142 HERMOSA AVENUE 13101 ASHINTON OULEVARD - 404LOTS 1, 1, 1 AND 1 IN LOC 1 OF HERMOSA EACH, IN THECIT OF HERMOSA EACH, COUNT OF LOS ANELES, STATE OFCALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN OO 1 PAES 2 AND 2OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNT RECORDER OF SAIDCOUNTAPN 413-004-02 30 FEETC-2 LEAL DESCRIPTION: PROECT INFORMATION MA UILDIN HEIHT:ONE: ONER:ARCHITECT:PROECT ADDRESS: LDM ENM 0012-03 09-17-12 AS NOTED HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA HERMOSA BEACH, CA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA BOUTIQUE HOTEL HOTEL, LLC 310-377-7873 VOICE HERMOSA website: envirotechno.com HERMOSA BOUTIQUE FLOOR AREA ANALSIS e-mail: luis@envirotechno.com LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066 CLIENT NAME:PROJECT TITLE: 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 404 SHEET TITLE: JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET NO: ROUND LEVEL PLAN SCALE:1/1"=1'-0" MIDDLE LEVEL PLAN SCALE:1/1"=1'-0" UPPER LEVEL PLAN SCALE:1/1"=1'-0" ROOF LEVEL PLAN SCALE:1/1"=1'-0" LDM ENM 0012-03 09-17-12 AS NOTED HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA HERMOSA BEACH, CA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA BOUTIQUE HOTEL HOTEL, LLC 310-377-7873 VOICE HERMOSA website: envirotechno.com HERMOSA BOUTIQUE SITE PLAN - PROPOSED e-mail: luis@envirotechno.com LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066 CLIENT NAME:PROJECT TITLE: 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 404 SHEET TITLE: JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET NO: SITE PLAN SCALE:1/"=1'-0" LDM ENM 0012-03 09-17-12 AS NOTED HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA HERMOSA BEACH, CA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA BOUTIQUE HOTEL HOTEL, LLC 310-377-7873 VOICE HERMOSA website: envirotechno.com HERMOSA BOUTIQUE ROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN e-mail: luis@envirotechno.com LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066 CLIENT NAME:PROJECT TITLE: 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 404 SHEET TITLE: JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET NO: ROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" LDM ENM 0012-03 09-17-12 AS NOTED HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA HERMOSA BEACH, CA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA BOUTIQUE HOTEL HOTEL, LLC 310-377-7873 VOICE HERMOSA website: envirotechno.com HERMOSA BOUTIQUE MIDDLE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN e-mail: luis@envirotechno.com LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066 CLIENT NAME:PROJECT TITLE: 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 404 SHEET TITLE: JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET NO: MIDDLE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" LDM ENM 0012-03 09-17-12 AS NOTED HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA HERMOSA BEACH, CA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA BOUTIQUE HOTEL HOTEL, LLC 310-377-7873 VOICE HERMOSA website: envirotechno.com HERMOSA BOUTIQUE UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN e-mail: luis@envirotechno.com LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066 CLIENT NAME:PROJECT TITLE: 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 404 SHEET TITLE: JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET NO: UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" LDM ENM 0012-03 09-17-12 AS NOTED HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA HERMOSA BEACH, CA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA BOUTIQUE HOTEL HOTEL, LLC 310-377-7873 VOICE HERMOSA website: envirotechno.com HERMOSA BOUTIQUE ROOF LEVEL PLAN e-mail: luis@envirotechno.com LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066 CLIENT NAME:PROJECT TITLE: 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 404 SHEET TITLE: JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET NO: ROOF LEVEL PLAN SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" LDM ENM 0012-03 09-17-12 AS NOTED HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA HERMOSA BEACH, CA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA BOUTIQUE HOTEL HOTEL, LLC EAST ELEVATION 310-377-7873 VOICE HERMOSA website: envirotechno.com HERMOSA BOUTIQUE SOUTH ELEVATION AND e-mail: luis@envirotechno.com LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066 CLIENT NAME:PROJECT TITLE: 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 404 SHEET TITLE: JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET NO: HERMOSA AVENUE SIDEWALK PROPERTY LINE 30' MAX. HEIGHT FIFTEENTH STREET SIDEWALK 30'-0" PROPERTY LINE EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" A B SHIELDED CONTINUOUSSHIELDED CONTINUOUS LIGHTINGLIGHTING 45.25' CRITICAL POINT PROPERTY LINE 30'-0"30'-0" PROPERTY LINE FIFTEENTH COURT 9'-0"9'-3"10'-3"9'-0"9'-3"10'-3" 30' MAX. HEIGHT 1'-0"8'-0"1'-3"8'-0"1'-3"9'-0"1'-0"8'-0"1'-3"8'-0"1'-3"9'-0" 11'-5" 30' MAX. HEIGHT LDM ENM 0012-03 09-17-12 AS NOTED HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA HERMOSA BEACH, CA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA BOUTIQUE HOTEL HOTEL, LLC EST ELEVATION 310-377-7873 VOICE HERMOSA website: envirotechno.com HERMOSA BOUTIQUE NORTH ELEVATION AND e-mail: luis@envirotechno.com LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066 CLIENT NAME:PROJECT TITLE: 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 404 SHEET TITLE: JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET NO: PROPERTY LINE 30' MAX. HEIGHT 30' MAX. HEIGHT FIFTEENTH COURT 30'-0" PROPERTY LINE 45.25' EST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" CRITICAL POINT DC TYP. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 30' MAX. HEIGHT PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 30'-0"8'-0"30'-0" FIFTEENTH STREET SIDEWALK 9'-0"9'-3"10'-3"9'-0"9'-3"10'-3" 30' MAX. HEIGHT 1'-0"8'-0"1'-3"8'-0"1'-3"9'-0"1'-0"8'-0"1'-3"8'-0"1'-3"9'-0" HERMOSA AVENUE LDM ENM 0012-03 09-17-12 AS NOTED HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA HERMOSA BEACH, CA 205 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 201 1429 HERMOSA AVENUE RAJU CHHABRIA & RHAVI KHOSLA BOUTIQUE HOTEL HOTEL, LLC 310-377-7873 VOICE HERMOSA website: envirotechno.com HERMOSA BOUTIQUE UILDIN SECTIONS e-mail: luis@envirotechno.com LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066 CLIENT NAME:PROJECT TITLE: 13101 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 404 SHEET TITLE: JOB NO:DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEET NO: 1'-0"8'-0"1'-3"8'-0"1'-3"9'-0" 9'-0"9'-3"10'-3" PROPERTY LINE FIFTEENTH STREET SIDEWALK PROPERTY LINE SECTION - 2 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"SECTION - 1 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 21 ELEVATOR PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 9'-0"9'-3"10'-6" FIFTEENTH COURT 1'-0"8'-0"1'-3"8'-0"1'-3"9'-3" 9'-0"9'-3"10'-3" 1'-0"8'-0"1'-3"8'-0"1'-3"9'-0" IFSNPTB!CFBDI-!DBMJGPSOJB IFSNPTB!CFBDI-!DB 316!QJFS!BWFOVF-!TVJUF!312 253:!IFSNPTB!BWFOVF OPTION 2 SBKV!DIIBCSJB!'!SIBWJ!LIPTMB CPVUJRVF!IPUFM IPUFM-!MMD & EAST LIGHTING ELEVATION IFSNPTB IFSNPTB!CPVUJRVF SOUTH LIGHTING ELEVATION DMJFOU!OBNF;QSPKFDU!UJUMF; TIFFU!UJUMF; IFSNPTB!CFBDI-!DBMJGPSOJB IFSNPTB!CFBDI-!DB 316!QJFS!BWFOVF-!TVJUF!312 253:!IFSNPTB!BWFOVF OPTION 2 SBKV!DIIBCSJB!'!SIBWJ!LIPTMB CPVUJRVF!IPUFM IPUFM-!MMD & WEST LIGHTING ELEVATION IFSNPTB IFSNPTB!CPVUJRVF NORTH LIGHTING ELEVATION DMJFOU!OBNF;QSPKFDU!UJUMF; TIFFU!UJUMF; o z Us W F 0 w= V{93 VLoy VN'HVS39 3H N ■ L 311f1S'3f1N3/V k131d 9riZ am, nN3/,V U3 �I HNIvVHa�0HOVHHDHI'� 011 1310H 3f1N3 \`J �OUIk13H FZbL VIH3H -l310H 3flt�unos NV�d U001A -3n31 3IGGIN m .. 3f1011f108 b'SOW213H t/SOW213H A?JVNIWIl3?Jd =w=