The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2009-04-21 PC AGENDAAGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 April 21, 2009 7:00 P.M. Ron Pizer, Chairman Peter Hoffman, Vice Chairman Kent Allen Shawn Darcy Sam Perrotti Note: No Smoking Is Allowed in The City Hall Council Chambers THE PUBLIC COMMENT IS LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER Planning Commission agendas and staff reports are available for review on the City’s web site at www.hermosabch.org. Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the Community Development Department during normal business hours from Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Final determinations of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the next regular City Council meeting date. If the 10th day falls on a Friday or City holiday, the appeal deadline is extended to the next City business day. Appeals shall be in written form and filed with the City Clerk's office, accompanied by an appeal fee. The City Clerk will set the appeal for public hearing before the City of Hermosa Beach City Council at the earliest date possible. If you challenge any City of Hermosa Beach decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described on this agenda, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices will be available for check out at the meeting. If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call or submit your request in writing to the Community Development Department at (310) 318-0242 at least 48 hours (two working days) prior to the meeting time to inform us of your needs and to determine if/how accommodation is feasible. 1 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Oral / Written Communications Anyone wishing to address the Commission regarding a matter not related to a public hearing on the agenda may do so at this time. Section I Consent Calendar 4. Approval of the following minutes: a) March 17, 2009 action minutes b) March 17, 2009 minutes excerpt for a Text Amendment to define and allow electronic message display signs in open space (OS) zones. 5. Resolution(s) for consideration THE RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED BELOW ARE FROM THE PLANNING STAFF AND ARE RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY. THE FINAL DECISION ON EACH ITEM RESTS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION. PLEASE DO NOT ASSUME THAT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WILL BE THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Section II Public Hearings 6. PDP 09-2 / PARK 09-1 -- Precise Development Plan for a two-story dental clinic (surgery center) consisting of 4,298 square feet and a Parking Plan for a reduced parking requirement based on the proposed specialized use as a dental surgical facility rather than a general practice dental clinic at the current animal hospital site at 1072, 1078 and 1080 Aviation Boulevard (continued from the March 17, 2009 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To approve the Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan. 7. L-5 -- Legal Determination of whether four (4) dwelling units exist at 831 8th Street, and whether the 3rd and 4th units are legal nonconforming and can continue to be used as dwelling units (continued from the March 17, 2009 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To declare the legal nonconforming status of Unit “D” at 831 8th Street, deny the legal nonconforming status of Unit “C” at 831 8th Street, and to authorize staff to amend the City records to reflect said determinations. 8. CUP 09-2 -- Conditional Use Permit Amendment to extend hours of operation of restaurant with on-sale general alcohol beverage service and live entertainment from 12 midnight daily and 2:00 a.m. New Years’ Eve to 1:00 a.m. the following morning Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights and Memorial Day, Labor Day, Fourth of July and various Federal and State holidays extend at 73 Pier Avenue, Mediterraneo Restaurant. Staff Recommended Action: To continue to the May 19, 2009 meeting as requested by the applicant. 2 9. PARK 09-3 -- Parking Plan to classify a yogurt shop as a ‘snack shop’ for the purpose of calculating parking requirements and possible payment of an in-lieu fee for less than required parking at 53 Pier Avenue # D, Froyolife (former retail use). Staff Recommended Action: To approve the Parking Plan, direct applicant to pay parking in-lieu fee, and adopt the attached resolution. Section III Hearing 10. CON 09-4 / PDP 09-5 -- Request for one year extension of a Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan for a 2-unit residential condominium project at 1520 Manhattan Avenue. Staff Recommended Action: To adopt a minute order extending the expiration date of the Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan by one year to April 20, 2010. Section IV 11. Staff Items a. Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. b. Community Development Department activity report of February, 2009. c. Status of Upper Pier Avenue Zoning Proposal. 12. Commissioner Items 13. Adjournment 3 ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HELD ON MARCH 17, 2009, 7:00 P.M., AT THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS All public testimony and the deliberations of the Planning Commission can be viewed on the City’s web site at www.hermosabch.org, On-Demand Video of City Meetings The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Pizer. 1. Pledge of Allegiance, led by Commissioner Hoffman. 2. Roll Call Present: Commissioners Allen, Darcy, Hoffman, Perrotti and Chairman Pizer Absent: None Also Present: Community Development Director Ken Robertson Assistant City Attorney Lauren Feldman Senior Planner Pamela Townsend Associate Planner Angela Mason Assistant Planner Eva Choi 3. Oral /Written Communication Anyone wishing to address the Commission regarding a matter not related to a public hearing on the agenda may do so at this time. a) Letter from Howard Longacre dated February 24, 2009 ACTION: To receive and file. Section I Consent Calendar 4. Approval of the following minutes: a) February 17, 2009 action minutes ACTION: To approve the above minutes with a minor correction on page 4, item 11a to add vote count. Motion by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Darcy. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. b) February 17, 2009 minutes excerpt for 1) Upper Pier Avenue zoning project. 2) Text Amendment to define and allow electronic message display signs in open space zones. Planning Commission Action Minutes March 17, 2009 1 ACTION: To approve the above minutes as presented. Motion by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Darcy. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 5. Resolution(s) for approval Section II Public Hearings 6. PDP 08-8 / PARK 08-6 -- Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan for a three-story 40- room hotel with two levels of parking containing 42 parking spaces with 32 of the 40 required spaces in tandem to be managed with 24-hour valet parking service and to allow greater than 30% compact parking; and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration at 1081, 1085 & 1087 Aviation Boulevard (continued from January 20, 2009 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To continue to the June 16, 2009 meeting as requested by the applicant, and direct staff to renotice the project and applicant to pay applicable fees. ACTION: To continue to the June 16, 2009 meeting and direct staff to renotice the project and applicant to pay applicable fees. Motion by Commissioner Perrotti, seconded by Commissioner Hoffman. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Allen, Darcy, Hoffman, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 7. TEXT 08-7 -- Text Amendment to define and allow electronic message display signs in open space (OS) zones, and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration (continued from January 20 and February 17, 2009 meetings). Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of the Text Amendment allowing electronic message display signs in the open space zone limited to the Community/Civic Center, and adoption of an Environmental Mitigated Negative Declaration. ACTION: To recommend approval of subject Text Amendment and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration by adopting the resolution with modifications on Section 17.50.110, paragraph B.1 to substitute “eight (8) seconds” with “thirty (30) seconds”, and paragraph B.4 be amended with “The electronic display shall be turned off no later than 11:00 P.M. and turned on no earlier than 6:00 A.M.” And for clarification of Section 17.50.110, paragraph A, insert “except as otherwise provided in this Section” after “All new signs shall require approval by the Planning Commission and,”. Motion by Commissioner Perrotti, seconded by Commissioner Hoffman. The motion Planning Commission Action Minutes March 17, 2009 2 carried as follows: AYES: Darcy, Hoffman, Perrotti NOES: Allen, Pizer ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 8. CON 09-1/PDP 09-1 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 70888 for a 4-unit residential condominium project at 931 1st Street (continued from the February 17, 2009 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To approve the Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map. ACTION: To approve subject Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 70888 and adopt the resolution as presented. Motion by Commissioner Allen, seconded by Commissioner Perrotti. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Allen, Darcy, Hoffman, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 9. PDP 09-2 / PARK 09-1 -- Precise Development Plan for a two-story dental office (surgical center) consisting of 4,000 square feet of ground level office area and 500 square feet of storage on the second level, and a Parking Plan to provide less than the required number of off-street parking spaces at 1072, 1078 and 1080 Aviation Boulevard (current animal hospital site). Staff Recommended Action: To approve the Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan. ACTION: To continue to an unspecified date for the applicant to work with staff and the architect to consider redesigning the project to accommodate code parking requirements. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Perrotti. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Allen, Darcy, Hoffman, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 10. L-5 -- Legal Determination of whether four (4) dwelling units exist at 831 8th Street, and whether the 3rd and 4th units are legal nonconforming and can continue to be used as dwelling units. Staff Recommended Action: To approve the legal nonconforming status of unit D, deny the Planning Commission Action Minutes March 17, 2009 3 legal nonconforming status of unit C, and to authorize staff to amend the City records to reflect said determinations. ACTION: To continue to the April 21, 2009 meeting for staff to review the materials submitted by the applicant at the meeting. MOTION by Commissioner Perrotti, seconded by Commissioner Allen. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Allen, Darcy, Hoffman, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 11. TEXT 08-6 -- Text Amendment regarding wind energy systems and to consider allowing or conditionally allowing said systems to exceed the height limit. Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. ACTION: To direct staff to initiate a Text Amendment permitting small wind energy systems with Conditional Use Permit. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Perrotti. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Allen, Hoffman, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: Darcy ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Director Robertson noted the earliest time the staff can bring back this Text Amendment is in two months as it requires CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) review and is subject to noticing period. Section III Hearings 12. CON 09-2 / PDP 09-3 / PARK 09-2 -- Request for one year extension for a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan for a 21-unit commercial condominium project at 2101 Pacific Coast Highway. Staff Recommended Action: To adopt a minute order extending the expiration date of the Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan by one year to March 16, 2010. ACTION: To extend, by minute order, the expiration date of subject Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan for one year to March 16, 2010. MOTION by Commissioner Perrotti, seconded by Commissioner Darcy. The motion Planning Commission Action Minutes March 17, 2009 4 carried by a unanimous vote. 13. CON 09-3 / PDP 09-4 -- Request for one year extension for a Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan for a 16-unit commercial condominium project at 3001 Pacific Coast Highway. Staff Recommended Action: To adopt a minute order extending the expiration date of subject Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan by one year to March 16, 2010. ACTION: To extend, by minute order, the expiration date of subject Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan for one year to March 16, 2010. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Perrotti. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Section IV 14. Staff Items a. Memorandum regarding March 31, 2009 City Council and Planning Commission joint meeting. ACTION: The Planning Commission consensus was to suggest adding a topic regarding future planning studies and priorities. b. Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. c. Community Development Department activity report of January, 2009. 15. Commissioner Items 16. Adjournment The meeting was formally adjourned at 10:02 P.M. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of March 17, 2009. ______________________________ _____________________________ Ron Pizer, Chairman Ken Robertson, Secretary ______________________ Date Planning Commission Action Minutes March 17, 2009 5 EXCERPT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HELD ON MARCH 17, 2009, 7:00 P.M., AT THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS PUBLIC HEARING 7. TEXT 08-7 -- Text Amendment to define and allow electronic message display signs in open space (OS) zones, and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration (continued from January 20 and February 17, 2009 meetings). Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of the text amendment allowing electronic message display signs in the Open Space zone limited to the Community/Civic Center, and adoption of an Environmental Mitigated Negative Declaration. Senior Planner Townsend presented staff report and noted that one supplemental document from Howard Longacre was provided to the Commission this evening; and in response to Mr. Longacre’s letter, she advised that the Public Works Department estimates it currently costs the City approximately $10,000 a year to change the messages which are displayed on the current sign. She stated she does not have an estimate on the cost for the maintenance and electricity of this sign. Commissioner Perrotti asked when the current sign is shut off. Director Robertson advised that the sign is on all night; and mentioned that the only complaints staff ever gets about the current sign is when the light fixtures go out. He advised that this sign uses old fluorescent light standards which are difficult to find. Chairman Pizer opened the public hearing. Morty Benjamin, 14th Street resident, noted his opposition to an electronic sign; stated he has lived at this home for 30 years; that he crosses this intersection almost every day; and advised that it is a very dangerous intersection to cross. He stated that an electronic sign at this location would add to the unsafe condition of this intersection by adding another distraction. He advised that the state is conducting a 2-year study on the use of these electronic signs to determine their impact on traffic safety; that the state is proposing a 2-year moratorium on these signs; and he requested that Hermosa Beach put a moratorium on these signs until that state study has been completed. He noted his understanding the city of Los Angeles also has a similar problem and that it has a limited moratorium on signs of this nature. Lisa Moore, Monterey Street resident, noted her support for an electronic sign at this site; and she clarified that the city of Los Angeles is scrutinizing billboard advertising, not electronic signs. While she supports replacing this old and outdated sign with an electronic sign, she stated the City should limit its advertising use. She noted that the current sign is too limited and that it cannot adequately advertise school and community events. She added that the sign should be turned off from 11:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M. Loren Guzarian, 14th Street resident, stated that Pacific Coast Highway and Pier Avenue is a very dangerous intersection and that an electronic sign at this location would add to this unsafe condition; that its location should be moved, suggesting placing it closer to the corner near the Excerpt Planning Commission Minutes March 17, 2009 1 Arco station; that there should be a guarantee no commercial advertising will be allowed; and suggested the City take the money for the new sign and, instead, fund a teacher or librarian position. Larry Hospinson, 14th Street resident, expressed his concern an electronic sign of the proposed size and location will adversely impact his view and quality of life; stated that one of his neighbors has been hit at this unsafe intersection and that this sign will increase the traffic hazards at this intersection; and he stated that should the City decide to place an electronic sign at this location, that its lights be turned off between 6:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. Oslum Laman, 14th Street resident, stated that the design indicates 64 square feet of signage, pointing out that is a massive LED screen; and he noted his opposition to an electronic sign of this size. He stated that should the City go forward with placing an electronic sign at this location, he would request the following: the sign should be at least half of 64 square feet in size; that the change of the sign be limited to 90 seconds; that its wattage be far below 30 watts; that it be turned off from 6:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M.; that its background colors be limited to a dark background with amber signage; that no changeable graphics be allowed; and that it be placed closer to the Arco station. There being no further input, Chairman Pizer closed the public hearing. Commissioner Allen stated he is in favor of an electronic sign to replace the existing dilapidated sign, but pointed out he is foremost concerned with the safety of motorists and pedestrians at this intersection. He stated he would have differing opinions about a sign depending on its location and that he believes this text amendment is putting the cart first before the horse. He stated a sign at this location should be turned off early and that its messages should not be changed any sooner than 90 seconds. He questioned why this text amendment is necessary at a point in time when no sign proposal is before this body, stating he cannot provide a specific recommendation without having a specific sign proposal to consider. He noted that a sign at its current location should remain static and that it not have any video capability. He reiterated that he is generally opposed to considering a text amendment without having a specific sign proposal. Commissioner Hoffman explained that the Planning Commission has been asked by City Council to look at a text amendment and zoning issues that might permit a sign proposal; and advised that decisions regarding the location of the sign and its design are out of the Planning Commission’s purview. He stated it is appropriate for the Planning Commission to look at the zoning in relationship to the General Plan to make sure the performance of permitted uses in the zone is consistent with that plan. He stated he is opposed to a sign at this intersection because of its safety hazards, noting the police have been called on several occasions to escort children across the street; and he stated this intersection is not compatible for both a Dewey Weber statue and an electronic sign. He expressed his opinion that staff has done a good job of incorporating the performance issues that were discussed at the last Planning Commission meeting; stated he is inclined to approve staff recommendation; but encouraged everyone who is opposed to this text amendment to voice that opposition in front of City Council, which is the body that has jurisdiction over the actual design and location of a sign. He pointed out that the proposed amendment to the ordinance prohibits advertising, that City code prohibits offsite advertising. Excerpt Planning Commission Minutes March 17, 2009 2 Commissioner Perrotti stated the proposed text amendment explicitly states that the display shall contain only static messages without movement; that it goes into detail what is not allowed, such as animation, flashing, blinking, fading in, scrolling, changes in color, intermittent or full motion video, prohibition of ads, and strict control of light intensity, reiterating that all of these things have already been addressed in this text amendment. He stated this amendment will allow exactly what the existing sign is used for, but that it’s proposing a more updated and efficiently operating sign. He stated he will support the proposed text amendment with the following changes: change in display shall be limited to a minimum of 30 seconds; that the sign shall be turned off at 11:00 P.M.; that the language in Paragraph 4, Page 3, last sentence, shall be “The electronic display shall be turned off no later than 11:00 P.M. and turned on no earlier than 6:00 A.M.,” noting this change in language will make it easier to adjust the hours of operation by the City Manager should an energy crisis warrant altered hours of operation. Commissioner Darcy stated that staff has done a great job in compiling the terms/conditions in response to the Commission’s comments at the prior meeting; stated that the Commission recommended at the last meeting the change in static display should be a minimum of 30 seconds; and stated an electronic board replacing the old board is a good addition to the community. He echoed the comment that the Commission is not approving a specific sign approval this evening, only a zoning amendment. Senior Planner Townsend highlighted the introductory paragraph on Page 2 of staff report, noting that an actual sign proposal will come back to the Planning Commission for consideration; and that an appeal could be made to City Council following that determination. She added that the ordinance as proposed in Item No. 7, Page 4, makes it clear the Planning Commission can impose additional requirements to ensure a sign is compatible at the time the Planning Commission actually sees a sign proposal. Assistant City Attorney Feldman stated that the code currently reads: “All new signs shall require approval by the Planning Commission.” Commissioner Hoffman stated that’s not been the policy of the City up to this point, highlighting some other signs which did not come before this body for approval. Director Robertson stated that the way this ordinance is worded is, the first determination for a sign, its design and location, will be made by the City Council because this is addressing City- owned property; and that it will then go for review by the Planning Commission and back to City Council for a final determination. Chairman Pizer stated that because there is no specific sign proposal, the Planning Commission could end up requiring more restrictive standards for a future sign proposal and questioned why there seems to be an urgency in getting a text amendment before a sign proposal. He stated he would prefer to see a sign proposal before any ordinance amendment is made, stating there should be a defined need for a text amendment. Director Robertson stated that the Planning Commission is charged with reviewing this text amendment without having a proposal for a sign, that the Commission is dealing with a hypothetical situation. Commissioner Allen stated this hypothetical situation is problematic. Excerpt Planning Commission Minutes March 17, 2009 3 Director Robertson pointed out that the Planning Commission typically does not know what building designs will be coming forward when it is writing zoning regulations; and that the Planning Commission just tries to set the outside limits and minimum standards for future proposals. Commissioner Allen stated he would be in favor of this if it was addressing the City at large, not one specific location with no specific sign proposal. Director Robertson stated the Commission is only considering two potential locations for a hypothetical sign, the Community Center and the Civic Center. Commissioner Allen reiterated that this is putting the cart before the horse and questioned the urgency of this matter. Senior Planner Townsend explained that earlier, staff came before the Planning Commission, at the direction of City Council, with a simple proposal for one electronic message display sign at the Community Center or Civic Center; that the Commission’s direction to staff at that time was for staff to set some standards for consideration; that staff later presented the Commission with a list of standards; and that this list of standards included this sign would be subject to review/approval by the Planning Commission just as it is with any other sign in the Open Space zone. She stated that City Council has asked for the Commission’s recommendation on the text amendment; and she expressed her opinion that if the Planning Commission does not render a recommendation, City Council may assume there is no recommendation and that Council will go forward with taking its own action. She suggested the appropriate action would either be to recommend approval or denial of the amendment, or recommend denial, but should City Council approve the text amendment, the Planning Commission would suggest some standards. MOTION by Commissioner Allen to DENY TEXT 08-7 -- Text Amendment to define and allow electronic message display signs in Open Space (OS) zones and Environmental Negative Declaration; however, should City Council approve the text amendment, the following would be recommended: that the sign be static for a minimum of 90 seconds; and that the sign shall be turned off at 10:00 P.M., Sunday through Thursday, and turned off at 11:00 P.M. on Fridays and Saturdays. This motion was amended and later died due to the lack of a second. Commissioner Perrotti stated he does not believe that is an appropriate recommendation. MOTION by Commissioner Allen to DENY TEXT 08-7 -- Text Amendment to define and allow electronic message display signs in Open Space (OS) zones and Environmental Negative Declaration. This motion died due to the lack of a second. MOTION by Commissioner Perrotti to APPROVE TEXT 08-7 -- Text Amendment to define and allow electronic message display signs in Open Space (OS) zones and Environmental Negative Declaration; that the change in display be a minimum of 30 seconds; and that Paragraph 4, be amended, “The electronic display shall be turned off no later than 11:00 P.M. and turned on no earlier than 6:00 A.M.” By way of a friendly amendment, Commissioner Hoffman requested the following changes: that Section 4, No. 2, 17.50.110, sign requirements, suggested leaving as is “Except as otherwise provided in this section, all new signs shall require approval by the Planning Commission.” He Excerpt Planning Commission Minutes March 17, 2009 4 suggested inserting the following: “Except as otherwise provided in this section, all new signs are limited to…” Commissioner Perrotti accepted the friendly amendments. Commissioner Hoffman seconded Commissioner Perrotti’s amended motion. Roll call vote carried as follows: AYES: Darcy, Hoffman, Perrotti NOES: Allen, Pizer ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Chairman Pizer asked for clarification on how a 30-watt sign relates to power consumption and intensity. Senior Planner Townsend stated that if requested, staff would provide that information to the Commission at the next meeting. Director Robertson pointed out that staff is not recommending any particular wattage at this time. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of March 17, 2009. ______________________________ _____________________________ Ron Pizer, Chairman Ken Robertson, Secretary ______________________ Date Excerpt Planning Commission Minutes March 17, 2009 5 (909) 724-9572 FAX (909) 980-9483 BUILDING DESIGN SERVICES 2009 PORTERFIELD WAYSUITE A, UPLAND, CA. 91786 MICHAEL D. CARPENTER DRAWINGS ISSUED FOR: CARPENTER D E S I G N C 1 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" N S E W PROJECT DENTAL OFFICE BUILDING JOB LOCATION 1072, 1078, 1080 AVIATION BLVD., HERMOSA BEACH, CA. OWNER DR'S. POSEK, DONLEVY, AND YING PROPERTIES LLC. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT TRACT A.P.N. 4186-001-03 & 4186-001-004 & 4186-001-026 PROJECT DATA ZONE C 3 OCCUPANCY "B " OFFICE ( DENTAL ) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VB FIRE SPRINKLERS YES (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT) SITE DATA LOT SIZE 11650 S.F. BUILDING SIZE 4298 S.F. NUMBER OF STORIES TWO BUILDING HEIGHT 30' PARKING 19 SPACES (1) HANDICAP & (18) STANDARD PARKING LOT 5500 S.F. (LOT COVERAGE 47.20 % ) LANDSCAPING 1900 S.F. ( LOT COVERAGE 16.3 % ) AREA TABULATION 3798 GROSS SQUARE FEET FIRST FLOOR OFFICE 500 GROSS SQUARE FEET SECOND FLOOR STORAGE 4298 GROSS SQUARE FEET TOTAL 146 S.F. ENTRY PORCH 82 S.F. EXIT PATIO 120 S.F. UTILITY PATIO JURISDICTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GOVERNING CODES BUILDING I.B.C 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE BUILDING C.B.C. 2007 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE ELECTRICAL C.E.C. 2007 CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CODE PLUMBING C.P.C. 2007 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE MECHANICAL C.M.C. 2007 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE ACCESSABILITY C.B.C. 2007 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE ENERGY C.B.C. 2007 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE FIRE C.B.C. 2007 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE ORDINANCES ALL APPLICABLE CITY, COUNTY AND STATE. SHEET INDEX C1 COVER SHEET / SITE PLAN C2 SITE PLAN DETAILS C3 LINE OF SITE PLAN A1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN A2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN / CROSS SECTION A3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A5 CROSS SECTION A6 ROOF PLAN NOTE:ALL EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE 90 DEGREE CUT OFF LIGHTS NOTE 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS. 2. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. MICHAEL D. CARPENTER SHALL BE INFORMED IN WRITTING OF ANY DISCREPANCY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE DISCHARGE OF POLUTANTS TO ANY STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS PROHIBITTED, NO SOLID WASTE, PETROLEUM BY PRODUCTS, SOIL PARTICULATE, CONSTUCTION WASTE MATERIALS OR WASTE WATER GENERATED ON CONSTUCTION SITES OR BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PLACED, CONVEYED OR DISCHARGED IN TO THE STREET, GUTTER OR STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. NOTE; THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2007 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE PROSPECT AVE.VICINITY MAP NO SCALE SITE N S E W AVIATION BLVD. OCCUPANT LOAD LEGEND PER CBC 1004.1 TABLE 1004.1.1 OCCUPANCY GROUP B ROOM AREA / OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR OCCUPANT LOAD OFFICE ( DENTAL ) 3798 SQUARE FEET / 100 38.00 STORAGE ( FILES ) 500 SQUARE FEET / 500 1.00 TOTAL 39.00 PER TABLE 1004.1.1 AN OCCUPANT LOAD MORE THAN 30 REQUIRES TWO EXITS PER TABLE 1005.1 REQUIRED EXIT WIDTH / OCCUPANT LOAD - 45.00 X .2 = TOTAL OF 9.00" OF REQUIRED EXIT DOOR WIDTH ( USE ONE 36" DOOR ) DESIGN REVIEW 2-9-09 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAYPROPOSED TWO STORY 4298 S.F. DENTAL OFFICECORONA ENTRANCEEXISTING ADJACENT STRUCTURE( NOT A PART ) EXISTING ADJACENT STRUCTURE( NOT A PART ) EXISTING ADJACENT STRUCTURE( NOT A PART )OWOSSON B CONSTRUCTION MARC BISHOPCOMMERCIAL* INDUSTRIAL 4780-D CHINO AVE CELL (909) 732-2902 RESIDENTIALMEDICAL*DENTAL CHINO CA. 91710 OFF. (909) 465-5181FAX (909) 465-5184THIS PLAN IS DESIGNED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF DESIGN BUILD CONSTRUCTION AND SHOULD ONLY BE USED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF NB CONSTRUCTION CONCRET E NEW TREE, DWARF CRAPE MYRTLE, SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN EXISTING STREET TREE, ( PALM ) NEW TREE, CRAPE MYRTLE SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN DENTAL 1072 AVIATION BLVD. HERMOSA BEACH, CA. CARPENTERDESIGNS@AOL.COM SURGICAL CENTERP/L 114.61'P/L 79.59'P/L 120.00' P/L 124.97 ' 1. ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL2. CONCRETE SIDEWALK 3. ACCESSIBLE SITE ENTRANCE SIGN, SEE DETAIL NO. 1 SHEET C 2 4. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN, SEE DETAIL NO. 2 SHEET C 25. RAMP 8% MAX SLOPE 6. 12" GROOVED BORDER 7. 6' TALL, 8" CMU BLOCK WALL7A. 3' TALL, 8" CMU BLOCK RETAINING WALL 7B. 3' TALL, 8" CMU BLOCK RETAINING WALL W/ 6' TALL WROUGHT IRON FENCE ABOVE 8. CMU COLUMN 9. STEEL SECURITY GATE9A. 6' TALL WROUGHT IRON FENCE 10. LANDSCAPING 11. INFILTRATION POND, SEE GRADING PLAN12. SWALE WITH NATIVE BUNCH GRASSES SUCH AS PURPLE NEEDLEGRASS OR DEERGRASS.13. 14. 15. ARBOR TO MATCH STRUCTURE 16. ARBOR TO MATCH STRUCTURE WITH MONUMENT SIGN BELOW 17. STEP OUT 18. 19. EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER 20. NEW 26' APPROACH 21. EXISTING APPROACH22. 23. 24. PERMEABLE OPEN JOINTED CONCRETE PAVERS 25. 2' WIDE SWALE, CONCRETE PAVERS 26. SQUARE, TRAFFIC RATED, IRON DRAIN GRATE, PRE CAST DRAIN BOX & PVC DRAIN PIPE THRU-CURB FACE 27. ENHANCED CONCRETE PAVING 28. CONCRETE CURB29. TRASH ENCLOSURE 30. TRANSFORMER EXISTING A D J A C E N T M U L T I R E S I D E N T I A L , Z O N E R - 2 ( N O T A P A R T ) 1 SITE PLAN KEY NOTES 1 2 3 5 6 7A 7 7B 7B 7B 9A 24 25 26 27 2 9 10 10 17 10 30 29 10 10 10 SWALE 1012 16 15 17 10 10 10 17 2019 19 21 28 28 28 28 2828 28 28 28 156.5 FS 155.8 FS 154.00 FS 158.42 FS 157.00 FF 154.18 FS 155.41 FS 164.0 NG 161.2 NG 158.0 FS 9A 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT 9 9 28 9A28 28 17 17 17 17 2 EMPLOYEE EMPLOYEE EMPLOYEE EMPLOYEE 10 7 9A 9A 164.0 NG 160.0 NG 163.5 TW 161.0 NG 163. NG 160.0 TW 12 C 2 SCALE: AS NOTED SITE PLAN DETAILS 8"1' - 0"80"3" CLRACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILTY CHARACTER PROPORTION & HEIGHT (ADA) LETTERS AND NUMBERS SHALL HAVE A WIDTH TO HEIGHT RATIO BETWEEN 3:5 AND 1:1 AND A STROKE HEIGHT RATIO BEWTEEN 1:5 AND 1:10. CHARACTER HEIGHT SHALL BE 3 INCH MINIMUM. RAISED CHARACTER HEIGHT SHALL BE 1/32 INCH MINIMUM.DIRECTION TO ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE 2" MINIMUM STEEL PIPE - PAINTED. FINISH GRADE OR FINISH SURFACE. 1' - 0" MIN. SQUARE CONCRETE PAD 18" THICK. ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES THAT ARE ACCESSIBLE TO PERSON WITH DISABLITIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY AT LEAST ONE STANDARD SIGN AND WITH ADDITIONAL SIGNS AS REQUIRED TO BE VISIBLE TO PERSONS ALONG PEDESTRIAN WAYS. THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED AT A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 80" FROM BOTTOM OF THE SIGN TO FINISH GRADE. ACCESSIBLE VAN ACCESSIBLE 84"1' - 0"8"3" CLRPARKING FREE STANDINGINTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILTY CHARACTER PROPORTION & HEIGHT LETTERS AND NUMBERS SHALL HAVE A WIDTH TO HEIGHT RATIO BETWEEN 3:5 AND 1:1 AND A STROKE HEIGHT RATIO BEWTEEN 1:5 AND 1:10. CHARACTER HEIGHT SHALL BE 3 INCH MINIMUM. RAISED CHARACTER HEIGHT SHALL BE 1/32 INCH MINIMUM.MINIMUM SIGN AREA SHALL BE 70 SQUARE INCHES 2" MINIMUM STEEL PIPE - PAINTED. FINISH GRADE OR FINISH SURFACE. 1' - 0" MIN. SQUARE CONCRETE PAD 18" THICK. ADDITIONAL SIGN AT VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES 1/2" RADIUS, TYPICAL EACH PARKING SPACE RESERVED FOR PERSONS WITH DISABLITIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A REFLECTORIZED SIGN PERMANENTLY POSTED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO AND VISABLE FROM EACH STALL OR SPACE CONSISTING OF A PROFILE VIEW OF A WHEEL CHAIR OCCUPANT IN WHITE ON A DARK BLUE BACKGROUND. SIGNS MAY BE CENTERED ON THE WALL AT THE INTERIOR END OF THE PARKING SPACE AT A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES ABOVE THE PARKING SPACE FINISH GRADE GROUND OR SIDEWALK. 2 PARKING SIGNAGE ~ INDIVIDUAL STALLS 80"22"17"3" CLR2" MINIMUM STEEL PIPE - PAINTED. FINISH GRADE OR FINISH SURFACE. 1' - 0" MIN. SQUARE CONCRETE PAD 18" THICK. 1 PARKING SIGNAGE ~ SITE ENTRANCE NO PARKING MINIMUM SIGN AREA SHALL BE 70 SQUARE INCHES UNAUTHORIZED VEHICLES PARKED IN DESIGNATEDACCESSIBLE SPACES NOT DISPLAYING DISTINGUISHINGPLACECARDS OR LISCENSE PLATES ISSUED FOR PERSONSWITH DISABLITIES MAY BE TOWED AWAY AT OWNER'S EXPENSE.TOWED VEHICLES MAY BE CLAIMED AT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _OR BY TELEPHONING _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. TEXT AS FOLLOWING: ALL LETTERS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1" IN HEIGHT WHITE LETTERS ON DARK BLUE BACKGROUND NOTE:SIGN HEIGHT, WHEN IN A PATH OF TRAVEL, SHALL BE POSTED AT A HEIGHT OF 80 INCHES FROM BOTTOM OF THE SIGN TO PARKING SPACE FINISH GRADE. 3 PARKING SIGNAGE ~ TO BUILDING ENTRANCE 25'-0" MAXIMUM10"6'-0"3" CLR4" MINIMUM STEELTUBE - PAINTED. FINISH GRADE OR FINISH SURFACE. CONCRETE FOOTING 6 PARKING LOT LIGHT POLE BASE PLATE COVER 4'-0" MIN.2'-6"( 4 ) 5/8" X 12' ANCHOR BOLTS 1 / 4 1 / 4 10"1 1/2" 1/2" X 10" X 10" STEEL BASE PLATE 3/4" DIAMETER HOLE 1 1/2" # 3 STIRRUPS AT 12" O.C. (6) # 5 VERTICAL BARS 2'-6" DIAMETER SEE DETAIL ON SHEET E 0.4 FORELECTRICAL CONDUIT CONNECTION SEE SHEET E 0.5 FOR LIGHT FIXTURE 90 DEGREE CUT OFF STYLE LUMINAIRES FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION BLOCK TRASH ENCLOSURE CONSTRUCT PER CITY STANDARD NUMBER 6" CONCRETE CURB DARK GRAY CONCRETE STEEL GATES, PAINT ILLUSTRATIVE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" SCALE: NONE SCALE: NONE SCALE: NONE ( 3 ) # 3 STIRRUPS AT A.B. (909) 621-4771 (909) 724-9572 FAX (909) 980-9483 BUILDING DESIGN SERVICES 2009 PORTERFIELD WAYSUITE A, UPLAND, CA. 91786 MICHAEL D. CARPENTER DRAWINGS ISSUED FOR: CARPENTER D E S I G N DESIGN REVIEW 2-9-09 N B CONSTRUCTION MARC BISHOPCOMMERCIAL* INDUSTRIAL 4780-D CHINO AVE CELL (909) 732-2902 RESIDENTIALMEDICAL*DENTAL CHINO CA. 91710 OFF. (909) 465-5181FAX (909) 465-5184 THIS PLAN IS DESIGNED AS AN INSTRUMENTOF DESIGN BUILD CONSTRUCTION ANDSHOULD ONLY BE USED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF NB CONSTRUCTION DENTAL 1072 AVIATION BLVD. HERMOSA BEACH, CA. CARPENTERDESIGNS@AOL.COM SURGICAL CENTER7'-0"9'-0" (909) 724-9572 FAX (909) 980-9483 BUILDING DESIGN SERVICES 2009 PORTERFIELD WAYSUITE A, UPLAND, CA. 91786 MICHAEL D. CARPENTER DRAWINGS ISSUED FOR: CARPENTER D E S I G N C 3 SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" LINE OF SITE PLAN LINE OF SITE APPROACHING PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC LINE OF SITE APPROACHING VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CORONA AVE.OWOSSO AVE.OWOSSO AVE.PROSPE CT A VE.PROSPECT AVE.N B CONSTRUCTION MARC BISHOPCOMMERCIAL* INDUSTRIAL 4780-D CHINO AVE CELL (909) 732-2902 RESIDENTIALMEDICAL*DENTAL CHINO CA. 91710 OFF. (909) 465-5181FAX (909) 465-5184 THIS PLAN IS DESIGNED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF DESIGN BUILD CONSTRUCTION AND SHOULD ONLY BE USED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF NB CONSTRUCTION DESIGN REVIEW 2-9-09 DENTAL 1072 AVIATION BLVD. HERMOSA BEACH, CA. CARPENTERDESIGNS@AOL.COM SURGICAL CENTER (909) 724-9572 FAX (909) 980-9483 BUILDING DESIGN SERVICES 2009 PORTERFIELD WAYSUITE A, UPLAND, CA. 91786 MICHAEL D. CARPENTER DRAWINGS ISSUED FOR: CARPENTER D E S I G N C 4 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" ROOF HEIGHT CALCULATION SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" N S E W DESIGN REVIEW 2-9-09 N B CONSTRUCTION MARC BISHOPCOMMERCIAL* INDUSTRIAL 4780-D CHINO AVE CELL (909) 732-2902 RESIDENTIALMEDICAL*DENTAL CHINO CA. 91710 OFF. (909) 465-5181FAX (909) 465-5184 THIS PLAN IS DESIGNED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF DESIGN BUILD CONSTRUCTION ANDSHOULD ONLY BE USED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF NB CONSTRUCTION DENTAL 1072 AVIATION BLVD. HERMOSA BEACH, CA. CARPENTERDESIGNS@AOL.COM SURGICAL CENTERP/L 114.61'P/L 79.59'P/L 120.00' P/L 124.97 ' 156.5 FS 155.8 FS 154.00 FS CP1 187.50'157.05' NG ( 30.45' A.N.G. ) ( 30.50' A.F.F. ) 155.41 FS 164.0 NG 161.2 NG 158.0 FS 164.0 NG 160.0 NG 163.5 TW 161.0 NG 163. NG 157.68 NG 13'-0"35'-10"22'-0"22'-0"8'-0"CP2 187.50'157.55' NG ( 29.95' A.N.G. ) ( 30.50' A.F.F. ) CP3 187.50' 157.03' NG ( 30.47' A.N.G. ) ( 30.50' A.F.F. ) (909) 724-9572 FAX (909) 980-9483 BUILDING DESIGN SERVICES 2009 PORTERFIELD WAYSUITE A, UPLAND, CA. 91786 MICHAEL D. CARPENTER DRAWINGS ISSUED FOR: CARPENTER D E S I G N A 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" FLOOR PLAN N B CONSTRUCTION MARC BISHOPCOMMERCIAL* INDUSTRIAL 4780-D CHINO AVE CELL (909) 732-2902 RESIDENTIALMEDICAL*DENTAL CHINO CA. 91710 OFF. (909) 465-5181FAX (909) 465-5184THIS PLAN IS DESIGNED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF DESIGN BUILD CONSTRUCTION AND SHOULD ONLY BE USED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF NB CONSTRUCTION DESIGN REVIEW 2-9-09 DENTAL 1072 AVIATION BLVD. HERMOSA BEACH, CA. CARPENTERDESIGNS@AOL.COM SURGICAL CENTER NOTE:MAIN EXIT DOORS SHALL BE OPENABLE FROMTHE INSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR ANY SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT CONCRETE SIDEWALKACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL8% MAX SLOPEBORDER12" GROOVED UP EQUIPMENT ROOM FILE ROOM IMPLANT CONSULTATION STORAGE BUSINESS OFFICE ADA COUNTERCHECK OUT ADA CHECK IN TREATMENT 1 TREATMENT 2 TREATMENT 3 TREATMENT 4DOCTOR OFFICE UNISEX RESTROOM MED GAS ADJUSTMENT ROOM CONSULTATION ROOM 1 CONSULTATION ROOM 2CONSULTATION ROOM 3FAMILY ROOM RECOVERY ROOM UTILITY PATIO UNISEX RESTROOM PANO X-RAY WAITING ROOM FIRST CONCRETE SIDEWALK 83'-10"1'-6"24'-0"27'-0"3'-0"STERILE JANITORIAL COMPUTER CHARTING U/C REFR.COFFEE BAR STAFF LOUNGE COPY FAX STORAGE SHELVES 53'-6"53'-6"55'-0"STORAGE ELECT. MAIN PANELEXIT PATIO 79'-0"4'-10" BIKE RACK DN FILE STORAGE ROOM (909) 724-9572 FAX (909) 980-9483 BUILDING DESIGN SERVICES 2009 PORTERFIELD WAYSUITE A, UPLAND, CA. 91786 MICHAEL D. CARPENTER DRAWINGS ISSUED FOR: CARPENTER D E S I G N A 2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SECOND FLOOR PLAN N B CONSTRUCTION MARC BISHOPCOMMERCIAL* INDUSTRIAL 4780-D CHINO AVE CELL (909) 732-2902 RESIDENTIALMEDICAL*DENTAL CHINO CA. 91710 OFF. (909) 465-5181FAX (909) 465-5184 THIS PLAN IS DESIGNED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF DESIGN BUILD CONSTRUCTION AND SHOULD ONLY BE USED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF NB CONSTRUCTION DESIGN REVIEW 2-9-09 DENTAL 1072 AVIATION BLVD. HERMOSA BEACH, CA. CARPENTERDESIGNS@AOL.COM SURGICAL CENTER 30'-0"30'-0"SECOND FLOOR PLAN (909) 724-9572 FAX (909) 980-9483 BUILDING DESIGN SERVICES 2009 PORTERFIELD WAYSUITE A, UPLAND, CA. 91786 MICHAEL D. CARPENTER DRAWINGS ISSUED FOR: CARPENTER D E S I G N A 3 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" DESIGN REVIEW 2-9-09 N B CONSTRUCTION MARC BISHOPCOMMERCIAL* INDUSTRIAL 4780-D CHINO AVE CELL (909) 732-2902 RESIDENTIALMEDICAL*DENTAL CHINO CA. 91710 OFF. (909) 465-5181FAX (909) 465-5184 THIS PLAN IS DESIGNED AS AN INSTRUMENTOF DESIGN BUILD CONSTRUCTION AND SHOULD ONLY BE USED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF NB CONSTRUCTION DENTAL 1072 AVIATION BLVD. HERMOSA BEACH, CA. CARPENTERDESIGNS@AOL.COM ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR SURGICAL CENTER 200 EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES 201. ROOFING TO BE GAF CLASS "A" COMPOSITION SHINGLE, SLATE GRAY, INSTALL PER MFG.HIGH WIND SPECIFICATIONS. 202. ROOFING AT FLAT AREAS TO BE UL CLASS "A", BUILT UP ROOFING AS PER CBC. 1501.2 WITH COOL ROOF COATING. LIGHT GRAY. 203. 204. EXTERIOR WALL FINISH TO BE JAMES HARDIE, CEMENT FIBER SIDING, PAINT FINISH, LIGHT GRAY 205. 206. WINDOWS, WINDOW FRAME, 2" X 4 1/2" CENTER SET, ALUMINUM, CLEAR ANODIZED. 207. ENTRY DOOR TO BE FIBERGLASS, FINISH TO BE MOHAGANY STAIN 208. HARDWARE TO BE OIL RUB BRONZE. 209. 210. RAIN GUTTERS TO BE WHITE. 211. EXPOSED METALS AT WALLS TO BE FINISHED WITH DUNN EDWARDS, COLOR TO MATCH SIDING 212. FACIA TO BE R.S.2X4" WITH PAINT FINISH, WHITE . 213. 214. UTILITY ROOM DOOR TO BE FINISHED TO MATCH ENTRY DOOR 215. 216. 217. 218. SHEET METAL CAP WITH DRIP EDGE, 219. WOOD ACCENTS TO BE RESAWN, PAINT FINISH, WHITE 220. 2X4" WOOD ACCENT TO BE RESAWN, PAINT FINISH, WHITE 221. 222. 4X6" R.S. BENT BEAM 224. 225. COLUMNS TO BE SQUARE, TAPERED, S4S WOOD, COLOR TO BE WHITE 226. 227. 228. 229. 230. STONE VENEER, EL DORADO, WEATHER EDGE, COLOR TO BE DEERFIELD. ( ICC ES LEGACY REPORT, ER- 3568 )231. 232. R.S. CORBLES, PAINT FINISH, WHITE 233. 4X10" R.S. CORBLES, PAINT FINISH, WHITE 234. 235. 236. 237. 238. 239. 240. 8-8-16 CMU BLOCK 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 222 232 232 201 201 204 204 204 204232 233 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION WEST, FACING PARKING LOT FRONT ELEVATION NORTH, FACING AVIATION BLVD. 240 225 230 232 232 233 POSEK, DONLEVY, AND YING 233233 233 233 233 233 233 220 220 233 DENTAL 1072 AVIATION BLVD. HERMOSA BEACH, CA. (909) 724-9572 FAX (909) 980-9483 BUILDING DESIGN SERVICES CARPENTERDESIGNS@AOL.COM 2009 PORTERFIELD WAYSUITE A, UPLAND, CA. 91786 MICHAEL D. CARPENTER DRAWINGS ISSUED FOR: CARPENTER D E S I G N A 4 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ELEVATIONS DESIGN REVIEW 1-9-09 N B CONSTRUCTION MARC BISHOPCOMMERCIAL* INDUSTRIAL 4780-D CHINO AVE CELL (909) 732-2902 RESIDENTIALMEDICAL*DENTAL CHINO CA. 91710 OFF. (909) 465-5181FAX (909) 465-5184THIS PLAN IS DESIGNED AS AN INSTRUMENTOF DESIGN BUILD CONSTRUCTION ANDSHOULD ONLY BE USED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF NB CONSTRUCTION EXTERIOR SURGICAL CENTER 200 EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES 201. ROOFING TO BE GAF CLASS "A" COMPOSITION SHINGLE, SLATE GRAY, INSTALL PER MFG.HIGH WIND SPECIFICATIONS. 202. ROOFING AT FLAT AREAS TO BE UL CLASS "A", BUILT UP ROOFING AS PER CBC. 1501.2 WITH COOL ROOF COATING. LIGHT GRAY. 203. 204. EXTERIOR WALL FINISH TO BE JAMES HARDIE, CEMENT FIBER SIDING, PAINT FINISH, LIGHT GRAY 205. 206. WINDOWS, WINDOW FRAME, 2" X 4 1/2" CENTER SET, ALUMINUM, CLEAR ANODIZED. 207. ENTRY DOOR TO BE FIBERGLASS, FINISH TO BE MOHAGANY STAIN 208. HARDWARE TO BE OIL RUB BRONZE. 209. 210. RAIN GUTTERS TO BE WHITE. 211. EXPOSED METALS AT WALLS TO BE FINISHED WITH DUNN EDWARDS, COLOR TO MATCH SIDING 212. FACIA TO BE R.S.2X4" WITH PAINT FINISH, WHITE . 213. 214. UTILITY ROOM DOOR TO BE FINISHED TO MATCH ENTRY DOOR 215. 216. 217. 218. SHEET METAL CAP WITH DRIP EDGE, 219. WOOD ACCENTS TO BE RESAWN, PAINT FINISH, WHITE 220. 2X4" WOOD ACCENT TO BE RESAWN, PAINT FINISH, WHITE 221. 222. 4X6" R.S. BENT BEAM 224. 225. COLUMNS TO BE SQUARE, TAPERED, S4S WOOD, COLOR TO BE WHITE226. 227. 228. 229. 230. STONE VENEER, EL DORADO, WEATHER EDGE, COLOR TO BE DEERFIELD. ( ICC ES LEGACY REPORT, ER- 3568 ) 231. 232. R.S. CORBLES, PAINT FINISH, WHITE 233. 4X10" R.S. CORBLES, PAINT FINISH, WHITE 234. 235. 236. 237. 238. 239. 240. 8-8-16 CMU BLOCK LEFT SIDE ELEVATION EAST, FACING ADJACENT COMMERCIAL PROPERTY REAR ELEVATION SOUTH, FACING MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 232 201 201 201 201 220 220 220 204 204 204204 204 240 240 233 233 233 233 233 233 (909) 724-9572 FAX (909) 980-9483 BUILDING DESIGN SERVICES 2009 PORTERFIELD WAYSUITE A, UPLAND, CA. 91786 MICHAEL D. CARPENTER DRAWINGS ISSUED FOR: CARPENTER D E S I G N A 5 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" N B CONSTRUCTION MARC BISHOPCOMMERCIAL* INDUSTRIAL 4780-D CHINO AVE CELL (909) 732-2902 RESIDENTIALMEDICAL*DENTAL CHINO CA. 91710 OFF. (909) 465-5181FAX (909) 465-5184THIS PLAN IS DESIGNED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF DESIGN BUILD CONSTRUCTION AND SHOULD ONLY BE USED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF NB CONSTRUCTION DESIGN REVIEW 2-9-09 DENTAL 1072 AVIATION BLVD. HERMOSA BEACH, CA. CARPENTERDESIGNS@AOL.COM SURGICAL CENTER CROSS SECTION 220 201 201 204 204 232 233 233 233 CROSS SECTION "A" CONSULTATION ROOM 2CONSULTATION ROOM 3CONSULTATION ROOM 4 RECOVERY ROOM RECOVERY ROOM ELECTRICAL ROOMWAITING ROOM HALL FILE STORAGE ROOM A/C 10'-0"12'-0"3'-0"2'-0"3'-0"15'-0"TOP OF PARAPET, FIRST FLOOR TOP OF ROOF SHEATHING, FIRST FLOOR BOTTOM OF TRUSS, FIRST FLOOR CEILING, FIRST FLOOR10'-0"18'-0"15'-0"30'-0"9'-0"CEILING, FIRST FLOOR (909) 724-9572 FAX (909) 980-9483 BUILDING DESIGN SERVICES 2009 PORTERFIELD WAYSUITE A, UPLAND, CA. 91786 MICHAEL D. CARPENTER DRAWINGS ISSUED FOR: CARPENTER D E S I G N A 6 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ROOF PLAN N B CONSTRUCTION MARC BISHOPCOMMERCIAL* INDUSTRIAL 4780-D CHINO AVE CELL (909) 732-2902 RESIDENTIALMEDICAL*DENTAL CHINO CA. 91710 OFF. (909) 465-5181FAX (909) 465-5184 THIS PLAN IS DESIGNED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF DESIGN BUILD CONSTRUCTION AND SHOULD ONLY BE USED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF NB CONSTRUCTION DESIGN REVIEW 2-9-09 DENTAL 1072 AVIATION BLVD. HERMOSA BEACH, CA. CARPENTERDESIGNS@AOL.COM SURGICAL CENTER6:126:126:126:126:126:12 6:126:126:126:126:126:126:12 6:12 6:126:126:126:126:126:126:126:12 6:12 6:12 6:12 6:12AC NOTE ROOFING TO BE GAF CLASS "A" COMPOSITION SHINGLE, SLATE GRAY, INSTALL PER MFG.HIGH WIND SPECIFICATIONS. ROOFING AT FLAT AREAS TO BE UL CLASS "A", BUILT UP ROOFING AS PER CBC. 1501.2 WITH COOL ROOF COATING. LIGHT GRAY. PROVIDE SELF LEVELING PLATFORMS AT H.V.A.C. EQUIPMENTTHUNDERBIRD ONE PIECE ROOF DRAIN IAMPO TESTED, UPC LISTED FILE NO. 2452 SEE DETAIL 12 SHEET D2 AC AC AC PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com Tentative Future Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION City of Hermosa Beach MAY 19, 2009 Project Title Staff Public Notice Meeting Date Date Rec’d Remarks ⇒ 2nd Qtr GPA (Notification) 5/7 5/19 F:b93\cd\wpc - future agenda 11a 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION FEBRUARY, 2009 MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT NUMBER OF PERMITS TYPE OF ACTIVITY CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE BUILDING 31 46 350 419 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 29 37 244 306 ELECTRIC 16 26 176 238 PLAN CHECK 18 17 138 193 SEWER USE 2 0 6 2 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 10 13 82 113 PARKS & RECREATION 0 0 1 0 IN LIEU PARKS & REC 0 2 2 5 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 2 SIGN REVIEW 1 7 15 24 FIRE FLOW FEES 6 5 50 53 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 0 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 1 1 8 7 COMMERCIAL INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 114 154 1,072 1,362 FEES COLLECTED TYPE OF FEE CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE BUILDING $26,168.06 $24,878.14 $242,022.85 $301,350.69 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL $4,786.00 $5,529.00 $39,862.50 $53,194.00 ELECTRIC $3,304.00 $4,297.80 $39,118.30 $45,963.80 PLAN CHECK $14,234.94 $6,756.09 $112,792.20 $238,700.95 SEWER USE $7,983.62 $0.00 $18,478.90 $2,963.00 RES. BLDG. REPORTS $2,430.00 $3,081.00 $19,794.60 $26,291.00 PARKS & RECREATION $0.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 $0.00 IN LIEU PARKS & REC $0.00 $31,788.00 $21,192.00 $91,768.00 BOARD OF APPEALS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,004.00 SIGN REVIEW $240.00 $1,680.00 $3,648.00 $5,662.00 FIRE FLOW FEES $5,549.00 $4,558.50 $56,274.00 $52,683.50 LEGAL DETERMINATION $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ZONING APPEALS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TEMPORARY SIGN $255.00 $249.00 $2,016.00 $1,713.00 COMMERCIAL INSPECTION $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TOTALS $64,950.62 $82,817.53 $558,699.35 $821,293.94 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2009 TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS DWELLING UNITS VALUATION 1 101 NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES DETACHED 2 102 NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES ATTACHED 3 103 NEW TWO FAMILY BUILDINGS 4 104 NEW 3 OR 4 FAMILY BUILDINGS 5 105 NEW 5 OR MORE FAMILY BUILDINGS 6 213 NEW HOTELS/MOTELS 7 214 NEW OTHER NON HOUSEKEEPING 8 318 NEW AMUSEMENT & RECREATION 9 319 NEW CHURCHS/OTHER 10 320 NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS 11 321 NEW PARKING GARAGES. 12 322 NEW SERVICE STATIONS/REPAIR GARAGES 13 323 NEW HOSPITALS/OTHER INSTITUTIONAL 14 324 NEW OFFICES/BANKS 2 $1,090,995.78 15 325 NEW PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITY BUILDINGS 16 326 NEW SCHOOLS/OTHER EDUCATIONAL 17 327 NEW STORES/OTHER MERCH BLDGS. 18 328 NEW OTHER NON RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS 19 329 NEW STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BUILDING 1 $10,000 20 434 ADD/ALTER DWELLING/POOLS 27 $785,864.78 21 437 ADD/ALTER NON RESIDENTIAL 5 $170,400 22 438 RESIDENTIAL GARAGES/CARPORTS 23 645 DEMOLITION-SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES 24 646 DEMO 2-FAMILY BUILDINGS 25 647 DEMO 3-4 FAMILY BUILDINGS 26 648 DEMO 5+ FAMILY BUILDINGS 27 649 DEMO ALL OTHER BUILDINGS 35 $2,057,260.56 TOTAL UNITS ADDED FY 2008-09 TO DATE: 19 TOTAL UNITS DEMOLISHED/LOST FY TO DATE: 18 (See Attached List) TOTAL NET UNITS FY TO DATE: 1 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Total New Dwelling Units: 50 Total New Dwelling Units: 56 Total Demolished Units: 29 Total Demolished Units: 66 Net Units: 21 Net Units: -10 3 Dwelling Units Demolished/Lost as of February, 2009 ADDRESS TYPE PERMIT DATE PERMIT NO. NO. OF UNIT 352 28th Street SFR 7/3/08 B08-315 1 2054 Manhattan Avenue SFR 7/8/08 B08-323 1 2117 Power Street SFR 7/24/08 B08-350 1 2826 The Strand SFR 7/24/08 B08-352 1 670 Longfellow Avenue Converting a Duplex to SFR 7/29/08 B08-221 1 628 Gould Avenue SFR 8/21/08 B08-387 1 2438 Palm Drive SFR 8/25/08 B08-391 1 457 31st Street SFR 9/18/08 B08-441 1 312 The Strand Duplex 10/27/08 B08-499 2 421 Monterey Blvd. Triplex 12/9/08 B08-567 3 1920 Springfield Avenue SFR 12/23/08 B08-580 1 1120 8th Street SFR 12/31/08 B08-588 1 726 Prospect Avenue 2 Units on Lot 12/31/08 B08-589 2 2021 Monterey Blvd. SFR 1/27/09 B09-28 1 Total Units Demolished 18 4 March 4, 2009 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL March 24, 2009 ACTIVITY REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION FEBRUARY, 2009 STAFF REPORT PREPARED SUBJECT THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE APPEAL / RECONSIDERATION 0 1 5 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) - CONDOMINIUMS 0 0 1 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) - COMMERCIAL 0 0 5 6 C.U.P./PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 5 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION 0 0 2 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MAP EXTENSION 0 0 1 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 1 0 FINAL MAP 0 0 6 5 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 0 1 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 0 0 0 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 1 0 1 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 0 0 0 0 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0 0 2 1 PARKING PLAN 0 0 0 3 SPECIAL STUDY 0 0 0 2 VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 0 1 0 1 TEXT AMENDMENT 3 1 17 9 TRANSIT 0 0 0 1 VARIANCE 0 1 1 5 ZONE CHANGE 0 0 0 0 MISCELLANEOUS 4 7 37 54 TOTAL REPORTS PREPARED 7 12 83 105 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once. Easy Reader Run Date: April 9, 2009 DISPLAY Acct: 7010-2110 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach shall hold a public hearing on Tuesday, April 21, 2009, to consider the following: 1. Precise Development Plan for a two-story dental clinic (surgery center) consisting of 4,298 square feet and a Parking Plan for a reduced parking requirement based on the proposed specialized use as a dental surgical facility rather than a general practice dental clinic at the current animal hospital site at 1072, 1078 and 1080 Aviation Boulevard (continued from the March 17, 2009 meeting). 2. Legal Determination of whether four (4) dwelling units exist at 831 8th Street, and whether the 3rd and 4th units are legal nonconforming and can continue to be used as dwelling units (continued from the March 17, 2009 meeting). 3. Conditional Use Permit Amendment to extend hours of operation of restaurant with on-sale general alcohol beverage service and live entertainment from 12 midnight daily and 2:00 a.m. New Years’ Eve to 1:00 a.m. the following morning Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights and Memorial Day, Labor Day, Fourth of July and various Federal and State holidays extend at 73 Pier Avenue, Mediterraneo Restaurant. 4. Parking Plan to classify a yogurt shop as a ‘snack shop’ for the purpose of calculating parking requirements and possible payment of an in-lieu fee for less than required parking at 53 Pier Avenue # D, Froyolife (former retail use). SAID PUBLIC HEARING shall be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate and speak at this hearing at the above time and place. For inclusion in the agenda packet to be distributed, written comments of interested parties should be submitted to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, in care of City Hall at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 prior to Thursday, April 16, 2009, at 12:00 noon. All written testimony by any interested party will be accepted prior to or at the scheduled time on the agenda for the matter. IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, at, or prior to, the public hearing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Community Development Department, Planning Division, at (310) 318-0242 or fax to (310) 937-6235. The Department is open from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday. Please contact a staff planner to discuss any project on the Planning Commission agenda. A copy of the staff report(s) in the Planning Commission packet will be available for public review at the end of the business day on Thursday, April 16, 2009, at the Hermosa Beach Police Department, Public Library, and, on the City’s web site at www.hermosabch.org. Relevant Municipal Code sections are also available on the web site. Ken Robertson, Director Community Development Department f:95\cclerk\legads\display\2009\planning\pc04-21-09