The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2009-06-16 PC AGENDAAGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 June 16, 2009 7:00 P.M. Ron Pizer, Chairman Peter Hoffman, Vice Chairman Kent Allen Shawn Darcy Sam Perrotti Note: No Smoking Is Allowed in The City Hall Council Chambers THE PUBLIC COMMENT IS LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER Planning Commission agendas and staff reports are available for review on the City’s web site at www.hermosabch.org. Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the Community Development Department during normal business hours from Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Final determinations of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the next regular City Council meeting date. If the 10th day falls on a Friday or City holiday, the appeal deadline is extended to the next City business day. Appeals shall be in written form and filed with the City Clerk's office, accompanied by an appeal fee. The City Clerk will set the appeal for public hearing before the City of Hermosa Beach City Council at the earliest date possible. If you challenge any City of Hermosa Beach decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described on this agenda, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices will be available for check out at the meeting. If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call or submit your request in writing to the Community Development Department at (310) 318-0242 at least 48 hours (two working days) prior to the meeting time to inform us of your needs and to determine if/how accommodation is feasible. 1 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Oral / Written Communications Anyone wishing to address the Commission regarding a matter not related to a public hearing on the agenda may do so at this time. Section I Consent Calendar 4. Approval of the May 19 2009 action minutes 5. Resolution(s) for consideration a) Resolution P.C. 09-10 amending and superseding Resolution 09-7 granting a legal determination for Unit D, a third unit at 831 8th street, and denying a legal determination for Unit C as a separate, fourth dwelling unit at 831 8th Street. THE RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED BELOW ARE FROM THE PLANNING STAFF AND ARE RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY. THE FINAL DECISION ON EACH ITEM RESTS WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION. PLEASE DO NOT ASSUME THAT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WILL BE THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Section II Public Hearings 6. PDP 08-8 / PARK 08-6 -- Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan for a three-story 40-room hotel with two levels of parking containing 42 parking spaces with 32 of the 40 required spaces in tandem to be managed with 24-hour valet parking service and to allow greater than 30% compact parking; and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration at 1081, 1085 & 1087 Aviation Boulevard (continued from January 20 and March 17, 2009 meetings). Staff Recommended Action: To continue to the July 21, 2009 meeting and direct staff to re-notice the project with 500-foot radius noticing and applicant to pay applicable fees. 7. CUP 09-2 -- Conditional Use Permit Amendment to extend hours of operation of restaurant with on-sale general alcohol beverage service and live entertainment from 12 midnight daily and 2:00 a.m. New Year's Eve to 1:00 a.m. the following morning Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights and Memorial Day, Labor Day, Fourth of July and various Federal and State holidays extend at 73 Pier Avenue, Mediterraneo Restaurant (continued from the April 21 and May 19, 2009 meetings). Staff Recommended Action: To continue to a date uncertain provided the applicant shall pay all costs for fully renoticing the public hearing. 8. VAR 09-1 -- Variance to the sign code to allow the installation of a double faced sign, 23 square feet per face with a maximum height of six feet in the R-1 zone, at 1818 Monterrey Boulevard, St. Cross Episcopal Church. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said sign variance. 2 9. L-5 -- Legal Determination of whether two (2) dwelling units exist and whether the 2nd unit (rear apartment over garage) is legal nonconforming and may continue to exist at 450 30th Street. Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. 10. CUP 09-4 -- Conditional Use Permit to allow approximately 500 square foot of outdoor patio dining in conjunction with a new restaurant, “Chipotle” (formerly IHOP) at 1439 Pacific Coast Highway. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said Conditional Use Permit. 11. PDP 09-6 -- Precise Development Plan/Planned Development for Hermosa Beach Restrooms Replacement Project (Project No. CIP 99-631) to replace three 630-square foot public restroom facilities with three 560 square foot facilities, including demolition, grading, construction, installation of wastewater holding tanks and related utility hookups, landscaping and lighting, located southwest of the intersection of The Strand with 22nd, 14th and 2nd Streets, and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said Precise Development Plan/Planned Development and adopt the Environmental Negative Declaration. 12. TEXT 09-1 -- Text amendment modifying sign regulations relating to temporary signs, real estate signs and construction signs (continued from the May 19, 2009 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said Text Amendment. Section III Hearings 13. CON 09-5/PDP 09-7/PARK 09-5 -- Request for a one year extension of the Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan for a twenty-one (21) unit commercial condominium at 906-910 Hermosa Avenue. Staff Recommended Action: To approve by minute order the extension of the Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan by one year to June 19, 2010. 14. LLA 09-1 -- Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the boundary between 1852 Rhodes Street and 1845 Hillcrest Drive to correctly reflect the ownership and use of the property. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said lot line adjustment. Section IV 15. Staff Items a. Review of Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for conformance with the City’s General Plan. b. Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. c. Community Development Department activity report of April, 2009. 16. Commissioner Items 17. Adjournment 3 ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HELD ON MAY 19, 2009, 7:00 P.M., AT THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS All public testimony and the deliberations of the Planning Commission can be viewed on the City’s web site at www.hermosabch.org, On-Demand Video of City Meetings The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Pizer. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call Present: Commissioners Allen, Darcy, Perrotti and Chairman Pizer Absent: Commissioner Hoffman (arrived at 7:52 P.M.) Also Present: Community Development Director Ken Robertson Assistant City Attorney Lauren Feldman Senior Planner Pamela Townsend Assistant Planner Eva Choi 3. Oral /Written Communication Anyone wishing to address the Commission regarding a matter not related to a public hearing on the agenda may do so at this time. Section I Consent Calendar 4. Approval of the April 21, 2009 action minutes ACTION: To approve the above minutes as presented. Motion by Commissioner Perrotti, seconded by Commissioner Allen. The motion carried by a unanimous vote, noting the absence of Commissioner Hoffman. 5. Resolution(s) for approval Section II Public Hearings 6. PDP 09-2 / PARK 09-1 -- Precise Development Plan for a two-story dental clinic (surgery center) consisting of approximately 4,298 square feet and a Parking Plan for a reduced parking requirement based on the proposed specialized use as a dental surgical facility rather than a general practice dental clinic at the current animal hospital site at 1072, 1078 and 1080 Aviation Boulevard (continued from the March 17 and April 21, 2009 meetings). Planning Commission Action Minutes May 19, 2009 1 Staff Recommended Action: To approve the Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan. ACTION: To approve subject Precise Development Plan and Parking Plan, and adopt the resolution with a revision to paragraph 2(g) to add the word “be” between “not used” to read “…storage, and not be used as…”. MOTION by Commissioner Perrotti, seconded by Commissioner Allen. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Allen, Darcy, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: Hoffman ABSTAIN: None 7. L-5 -- Request to amend the legal determination that three units are legal nonconforming, with respect to the specific condition requiring conversion of the illegal fourth unit (‘Unit C”) to an enclosed garage space, at 831 8th Street. Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. ACTION: To approve alternative No. 1 amending the original resolution modifying Condition No. 1 to allow the area known as Unit 'C' to be retained as habitable space, the space is conformed to applicable codes, a parking space is established in front of Unit 'D', and the exterior door is converted to an accessible window; the stairway connecting Unit 'C' with Unit A shall be unenclosed to the extent reasonably feasible taking into account space and privacy concerns as determined by the Community Development Director, and a covenant prohibiting use of said Unit 'C' (the downstairs portion of Unit A) as a separate dwelling unit shall be recorded. MOTION by Commissioner Allen, seconded by Commissioner Perrotti. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Allen, Darcy, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: Hoffman ABSTAIN: None 8. CUP 09-2 -- Conditional Use Permit Amendment to extend hours of operation of restaurant with on-sale general alcohol beverage service and live entertainment from 12 midnight daily and 2:00 a.m. New Year's Eve to 1:00 a.m. the following morning Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights and Memorial Day, Labor Day, Fourth of July and various Federal and State holidays extend at 73 Pier Avenue, Mediterraneo Restaurant (continued from the April 21, 2009 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To continue to the June 16, 2009 meeting as requested by the applicant. Planning Commission Action Minutes May 19, 2009 2 ACTION: To continue to the June 16, 2009 meeting provided the applicant pays for 500’ re-noticing and other noticing methods, and posts the orange poster from Monday, May 25, 2009 until June 16, 2009. Motion by Commissioner Allen, seconded by Commissioner Perrotti. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Allen, Darcy, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Hoffman 9. CUP 09-3 / PARK 09-4 -- Conditional Use Permit for a music studio comprising 2,265 square feet offering private and small group instruction, and a Parking Plan to determine parking requirement and if the shared off-street parking is adequate at 300 Pacific Coast Highway. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan. ACTION: To approve said Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan by adopting the resolution. Motion by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Perrotti. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Allen, Darcy, Hoffman, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 10. TEXT 09-1 -- Text amendment modifying sign regulations relating to temporary signs. Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said Text Amendment ACTION: To continue to the June 16, 2009 meeting and direct staff to revise the text regarding the height placement of signs; whether signs will be placed in landscaped areas and to clarify the language related to the exception for grand openings to make sure the time period is correct. Motion by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Allen. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Allen, Darcy, Hoffman, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Planning Commission Action Minutes May 19, 2009 3 Section III 11. Staff Items a. Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. b. Community Development Department activity report of March, 2009. c. Status of Upper Pier Avenue Zoning Proposal. 12. Commissioner Items 13. Adjournment The meeting was formally adjourned at 9:09 P.M. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of May 19, 2009. ______________________________ _____________________________ Ron Pizer, Chairman Ken Robertson, Secretary ______________________ Date Planning Commission Action Minutes May 19, 2009 4 ST CROSS- PROPOSED SIGN June 4, 2009 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission June 16, 2009 SUBJECT: SIGN VARIANCE (VAR 09-1) LOCATION: 1818 MONTEREY BOULEVARD APPLICANT: CRAIG BOELSEN, PACIFIC COAST LANDSCAPE 1603 AVIATION BOULEVARD, SUITE A REDONDO BEACH, CA 90278 OWNER: RECTOR WARDENS & VESTRYMEMBERS ST. CROSS PARISH OF HERMOSA BEACH 1818 MONTEREY BOULEVARD HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: TO REPLACE AN EXISTING 18 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FACED ILLUMINATED GROUND SIGN, 8 FEET IN HEIGHT, WITH A DOUBLE- FACED (22 SQUARE FEET PER FACE) ILLUMINATED GROUND SIGN, 6 FEET IN HEIGHT Recommendation To adopt the attached resolution approving a sign variance subject to conditions. Background ZONING: R-2 (Two-Family Residential) GENERAL PLAN: Medium Density Residential LOT AREA: 1.3 acres LAND USE: St. Cross by-the-Sea Episcopal Church complex SIGN AREA: EXISTING/PROPOSED 18 sf single face/ 22 sf per face – double faced SIGN TYPE: EXISTING/PROPOSED Bulletin board ground sign, illuminated / same type proposed SIGN HEIGHT: EXISTING/PROPOSED 8 feet / 6 feet-5 inches The applicant on behalf of St. Cross Church requests to replace an existing 18 square foot wooden sign mounted on two poles,1 with a total height of 8 feet. The proposed sign will be a double-faced (22 square feet per face) plastic and aluminum sign facing perpendicular to the street, located on top of a brick wall (30 inches high), for a total height of 6 feet-5 inches. There are no other signs on the site, other than parking lot signs and a post with signage located in front of the facility.2 1 "Bulletin board sign" – structure displaying the name of a park, church, school, library, community center or similar institution and the announcement of the services or activities thereof. 2 The applicant has clarified that lettering is not proposed on 'new brick walls' as labeled in the site plan, and the walls have been constructed. 1 The site is an L-shaped interior lot on the east side of Monterey Blvd. The property is split-zoned R-1 and R-2; the existing and proposed sign sites are located on that portion zoned R-2. Surrounding lots are also zoned R-1 and R-2; apartments maintained by the Church are located adjacent and north of the Church. Analysis Sign regulations: H.B.M.C. Section 17.50.090 limits signs in residential zones to the following: Identification sign: one wall sign, maximum area 2 square feet, containing name and address of occupant of premises. May be illuminated if indirect, shielded and static. Real estates signs: One unlighted wall sign, maximum area 6 square feet, or 10 square feet if double-faced. Real estates signs on site with multiple dwelling units: one unlighted wall or ground rental sign, maximum area 12 square feet, or 16 square feet if double-faced. Must be removed upon renting units. The maximum height of ground signs is 4 feet above finished grade; walls signs are limited to 8 feet in height. Other than maintenance or changing the copy on a sign face, replacement or relocation must conform to the adopted regulations. No exceptions are provided for churches, schools, day care centers, or similar uses. Proposed sign: The proposed sign is nonconforming to size, type, and height standards as shown in the following table. Criteria Proposed Sign Existing Sign Sign Code standards Type/number 1- bulletin board 1 - identification 1- identification Location ground ground wall Area 22 sf per face 18 sf 2 sf Height 6 feet-5 inches 8 feet 4 feet The proposed sign area significantly exceeds the 2 square foot sign area allowed for identification signs; however, the sign requirements for residential zones do not account for the signage needs of institutional uses, such as churches, educational facilities and day cares, that are permitted in local neighborhood areas. Sign area of the proposed sign is about 20% greater than the existing sign. While height is lower, it is offset by the more visible location of the proposed sign. The existing sign is located near the building, parallel to the street. The proposed sign would be located north of the existing sign, on a low wall adjoining the parking lot, situated perpendicular to the street. The applicant indicates the proposed sign will be illuminated by lighting placed near the base of the sign, in a manner similar to the existing sign.3 Findings: A sign variance may be approved to allow a property owner to use his/her property in a manner consistent with other property owners in the same zone subject to the findings in H.B.M.C. Section 17.50.190, which are addressed below. 3 The applicant has stated that the sign will be externally illuminated. 2 Attachment 1 RESOLUTION PC 09-X A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM SIGN STANDARDS AT 1818 MONTEREY BOULEVARD (ST. CROSS EPISCOPAL CHURCH), LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PORTION OF LOT 12, BLOCK 71, SECOND ADDITION; LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5, P. McNERNEY’S REPLAT OF A PORTION OF LOT 12, BLOCK 71 OF 2ND ADDITION; LOTS 11, 12, 13 & 14, BLOCK 53, FIRST ADDITION; LOTS 19, 20 & 21, TRACT NO. 1129, BLOCK 53; LOTS 17 & 18, TRACT NO. 1128, BLOCK 53, HERMOSA BEACH. The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application for a sign variance was filed by Craig Boelsen, Pacific Coast Landscape on behalf of Rector Wardens & Vestrymembers, St. Cross Parish. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for sign variance (VAR 09-1) on June 16, 2009, at which time testimony and evidence, both oral and written, was presented to a considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. The project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15311(a) on-premises signs. Section 4. Based on the Staff Reports, testimony and evidence received, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: 1. The applicant proposes to replace an existing 18 square foot, 8 foot high ground sign located in front of a church oriented parallel to the street, with a 22 square foot, 6 foot high message board sign to be located on top of a planter wall in front of the church, oriented perpendicular to the street. 2. The subject property is zoned R-2 and is surrounded by R-1 and R-2 zoned lots and uses. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pursuant to H.B.M.C. Section 17.50.190: 1. Special conditions and extraordinary circumstances apply to the property and do not apply to the other properties in the vicinity so that the strict application of this chapter works a demonstrated hardship on the particular property. The property is split zoned as R-1 and R-2 and churches are allowed in both residential zones subject to a conditional use permit; however, this particular church is legal nonconforming as it as it was constructed before 1953 and does not have a conditional use permit. The existing sign also does not meet the code requirements for signs in residential zones. Replacement of the sign with a conforming sign is impractical in that churches, primary educational facilities, day care centers and similar uses may be located within the local neighborhood areas they serve, providing social services and events, and creating a sense of community; however, the sign code does not make any distinction among uses in residential zones and the sign requirements do not account for the signage needs of institutional uses Churches, schools and similar facilities allowed in residential zones occupy larger sites than the residential uses. In this case, lot frontage is about 320 feet, versus 34 to 50 feet for residential uses in the same block. A sign conforming to residential sign standards (i.e. sign area) would be substantially out of scale with physical dimensions of the subject property. Therefore, the property is unique in terms of use type, community function and physical dimensions compared with other 5 properties in the vicinity, and it is advantageous that this facility be allowed a message board sign that exceeds the allowed sign area, provided the sign is not intrusive. 2. A variance authorized is not a grant of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. The proposed sign will replace an existing sign for a non-profit, community use and will assist in notifying the community of the events and community services at the facility. Other properties in the vicinity are restricted to residential uses and do not have the same needs to notify the community of events and services offered. Therefore, allowing increased sign area for the institutional use in the form of a message board is not a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the other residential properties in the area. Residential lot frontages are typically 34 to 50 feet in the same block, while the Church frontage is about 320 feet. Therefore, in terms of visibility, a conforming sign located at this property may 'disappear' and not be as readily visible as would a sign of the same size on nearby residential lots. In addition, allowing increased sign area is reasonable and consistent with signage at the other churches in residential zones. Our Lady of Guadalupe, 320 Massey Street (R-1 zone), has an approximately 15 square foot message sign, 8 feet high, and an identification sign approximately 8 square feet in size attached to a gate. The Christian Science Church, 1574 Manhattan Avenue (R-3 zone), has two signs approximately 21 square feet in size; one is about 6 feet in height and the other is a banner type wall sign. Therefore, the proposed sign is not out of character with signs at comparable facilities in residential zones and would not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with other churches in residential zones. 3. The variance will not adversely affect public safety and the design and appearance of the signing and structures of the surrounding area. The proposed sign is not out of scale with the size of the subject parcel and improvements on the site and will not impact line of sight or public safety; there are no other nearby signs. Its scale and location on a planter wall ensures that it will not be visually obtrusive. The closest property is owned by the Church; the location is several hundred feet from residential uses to the south, and the orientation makes the sign less visible to the closest residence across the street. Given the neighborhood location, the sign illumination will be static, external and oriented so that only the sign face is illuminated with a low intensity light and automatically turned off between 10:00 p.m. and dawn. With these provisions, the sign will be adequately conditioned to prevent adverse impacts to public safety and the surrounding area. Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves sign Variance 09-1, subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The sign shall comply with and not exceed the sign area, height and other standards of the plan approved by the Planning Commission on June 16, 2009. 2. A sign permit, and building and/or electrical permits as may be applicable, shall be obtained prior to erecting the sign or lighting. 3. Any illumination shall be static, external and oriented so that only the sign face is illuminated, automatically turned off between 10:00 p.m. and dawn, and low intensity subject to approved by the Community Development Director per H.B.M.C. Section 17.50.070.A.5. Section 6. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this Sign Variance. 6 Each of the above conditions is separately enforceable and, if one of the conditions is found unenforceable by a court of law, all other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. The Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Hermosa Beach and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul this Sign Variance. The City shall promptly notify the Permittee of any claim, action or proceeding and the City shall fully cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the Permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify or hold harmless the City. The Permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney’s fees that the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the Permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action but such participation shall not relieve the Permittee of any obligation under this Sign Variance. Section 7. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. No. 09-X is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of June 16, 2009. Ron Pizer, Chairman Ken Robertson, Secretary June 16, 2009 _____________ Date 7 ATTACHMENT 2 ZONING MAP POSTER 8 ATTACHMENT 3 Proposed site Existing sign 10 Existing sign Proposed location 11 From: Dana Cantelmo [mailto:dcatemp@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 6:54 PM To: City Clerk Subject: Planning Commission Mtg tonight 5/16- ITEM 8 On behalf of the residents of Monterey Blvd please do not allow the new sign described in this variance application. We share our residential neighborhood with St. Cross Episcopal Church. As good neighbors, we don't complain about the crowded streets during their functions or the selling of parking spaces during Hermosa Beach's functions. In return we get to enjoy the beauty of the building and newly rennovated landscaping. I am strongly opposed to your granting a variance in this neighborhood for a larger than allowed, times two- double sided, illuminated and not only an identifying sign but a 'bulletin board" ADVERTISING sign. Please respect the resdents of this community and say no. Sincerely, Dana Cantelmo and family 1710 Monterey Blvd. From: Anthony Gatti <anthony.gatti@ymail.com> To: krobertson@hermosabch.org Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 9:27:03 AM Subject: Letter regarding 450 30th Street, Lot 26 B1 126 Tract Shakespeare Ken Robertson, Director Community Development Department Planning Division City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (310)318-0242 Fax: (310)937-6235 RE: Subject Property, 450 30th Street, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, Lot 26 B1 126 Tract Shakespeare Dear Mr. Roberston. I am the current owner of a home at 449 29th Street. My two car garage opens directly to the subject property's garage door. Our properties share the alley. I have owned the home since app. 1998. I am very familiar with all the neighbors and the properties. To my knowledge until the present property owners purchased the home in app. 2001, the structure above the garage was never rented to tenants. As you know, parking is definitely challenging in this area of North Hermosa Beach. To create a rental unit from a non-conforming status without requiring new parking spaces, in my humble opinion is not prudent City Planning. I urge you strongly to deny the request of the owners of 450 30th Street to allow the structure above the garage to become a "conforming, legal rental unit". If the City of Hermosa Beach allows this request, I believe this would have a very negative effect (hardship) on the neighborhood from a parking perspective and a quality of life issue for all the residents in the very near vicinity of 450 30th Street. Thank you. Anthony Gatti 449 29th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 294-TIER7-TIER7-TIER7-TIERScale: Project No.: Drawn By: CAD File: !"#$%&’()*+,-%(’,-.#,$%#,/’0*.-#’,%10’10#+-.02%-’%3.4+0#’%50("#-+(-$%.,&% #$%/)0,#$"+&%#,%(’,/#&+,(+%/’0%-"+%4#*#-+&%1)01’$+%’/%+6.4).-#’,7%8#&&#,9%’0% 0+6#+:;% !"#$% &’()*+,-% ’0% #-$% (’,-+,-$% *.2% ,’-% 8+% )$+&% /’0% .,2% ’-"+0% 1)01’$+%.,&%*.2%,’-%8+%0+10’&)(+&%’0%&#$(4’$+&%-’%’-"+0$%:#-"’)-%-"+ 10#’0%:0#--+,%(’,$+,-%’/%3.4+0#’%50("#-+(-$; Date DESCRIPTION PROJECTLICENSED ARC H I TECT * S T ATE OF CAL I F O R N IA *LIC. NO. C 24228 EXPIRES 7-30-09NICCOLO VAL E RIOCUP SUBMITTAL05/19/09 615-08-58!! HERMOSA BEACH! STORE 1286! 1439 PACIFIC COAST HWY! HERMOSA BEACH! CA 90254 JL CUP_a050_site-1286 A050 Site Plan 1/16"=1'-0" (E) UNION BANK OF CA N.I.C.!Gross Area = 3,600 sq. ft. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PATIO AREA NO PARKING PROPERTY LINE ELECTRICAL ROOM WATER METER ROOM E PARKING CALCULATIONS SHEET NOTES LEGEND 1. ! ! CHIPOTLE! (2,700 SQ.FT.)! ! CHIPOTLE PATIO! (500 SQ. FT.)! ! UNION BANK! (3,600 SQ. FT.)! ! ! TOTAL 1.! ! 2.! ! ! 3.! ! 4.! ! 5.! ! 6.! ! 7.! ! 8.! ! 9.! ! ! 10.! ALL STAGING IS TO BE COORDINATED WITH LANDLORD'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. MATERIALS, TOOLD AND EQUIPMENT MUST E STORED WITHIN THE PREMISES. KEY NOTES PROVIDED! ! ! 27! ! ! 5! ! ! 14! ! ! 46 REQUIRED! ! ! 27! ! ! 5! ! ! 14! ! ! 46 RATIO! ! ! 1/100 SF.! ! ! 1/100 SF.! ! ! 1/250 SF. (E) SIDEWALK N.I.C.! ! (E) PLANTER BED W/ (N) PLANTS, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS.! ! (N) PLANTER BED, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS.! ! (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK.! ! (N) CURB.! ! (E) PARKING SPACES TO REMAIN.! ! NO WORK IN THIS AREA.! ! (N) ELECTRICAL ROOM.! ! (N) TRASH ENCLOSURE & 1500 GALLONS GREASE BIN W/ FLOOR DRAIN & HOSE BIB, SEE DETAIL 01/A501.! ! (N) PARKING SPACES 5 10 6 6 10 8 1 2 3 3 9 7 7 4 CHIPOTLE! Gross Area = 2,700 sq.ft! Net Area= 2,570 sq.ft 6 10 CL CL Proposed Patio! Area = 500 sq.ft! Seats 22 STOP 17'-3"42'-0"38'-6"24'-10"104'-3" CLR.25'-1" (N) CURB25'-0" 90' 35'10' C B D 34 2 1 A 4-TIER7-TIER7-TIER7-TIERScale: Project No.: Drawn By: CAD File: !"#$%&’()*+,-%(’,-.#,$%#,/’0*.-#’,%10’10#+-.02%-’%3.4+0#’%50("#-+(-$%.,&% #$%/)0,#$"+&%#,%(’,/#&+,(+%/’0%-"+%4#*#-+&%1)01’$+%’/%+6.4).-#’,7%8#&&#,9%’0% 0+6#+:;% !"#$% &’()*+,-% ’0% #-$% (’,-+,-$% *.2% ,’-% 8+% )$+&% /’0% .,2% ’-"+0% 1)01’$+%.,&%*.2%,’-%8+%0+10’&)(+&%’0%&#$(4’$+&%-’%’-"+0$%:#-"’)-%-"+ 10#’0%:0#--+,%(’,$+,-%’/%3.4+0#’%50("#-+(-$; Date DESCRIPTION PROJECTLICENSED ARC H I TECT * S T ATE OF CAL I F O R N IA *LIC. NO. C 24228 EXPIRES 7-30-09NICCOLO VAL E RIOCUP SUBMITTAL05/19/09 615-08-58!! HERMOSA BEACH! STORE 1286! 1439 PACIFIC COAST HWY! HERMOSA BEACH! CA 90254 JL CUP_a051_enl site-1286 A051 Enlarged Site Plan 1/8"=1'-0" Proposed Patio! Area = 500 sq.ft! Seats 22 CHIPOTLE! Gross Area = 2,700 sq.ft! Net Area= 2,570 sq.ft ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL NO PARKING PROPERTY LINE ELECTRICAL ROOM WATER METER ROOM E LEGEND PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYL L L P P P Planter Planter Planter Umbrella Patio Furniture STOP 5'-0"5'-0"2'-8"12'-10"39'-4"3'-11"4'-2"4'-2"6'-4" A200 Exterior Elevation 1/4"=1'-0" 1 23 JL CUP_a200_elev-1286 1 1 7 7 7 3 12 9 13 13 3 3 3 9 7 2 22 4 4 4 4 45 5 66 6 1416 14 16 5 02 SOUTH ELEVATION 01 EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" KEY NOTES LEGEND REFER TO KEYNOTES SHEET A200 REFER TO SHEET A025 DOOR SCHEDULE REFER TO SHEET A026 WINDOW SCHEDULE 1 1 A DENOTES TEMPERED GLAZING 1.! ! ! ! 2.! ! 3.! ! 4.! ! 5.! ! 6.! ! 7.! ! 8.! ! 9.! ! 10.! ! 11.! ! 12.! ! ! 13.! ! 14.! ! 15.! ! 16. INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED REMOTE CHANNEL LETTERS.! NOTE: (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT) COORDINATE W/ CHIPOTLE SIGN VENDOR.! ! CHIPOTLE WOOD STILE AND RAIL DOORS, SEE SHEET A025.! ! LINE OF ROOF BEYOND PARAPET.! ! STUCCO, CHIPOTLE RED COLOR.! ! STUCCO, FLANNEL GREY COLOR.! ! CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM. USE CLASS 4 GLASS. ! ! GALVANIZED METAL COPING.! ! HOLLOW METAL DOOR W/ PEEP HOLE, SEE SHEET A025.! ! 8" TALL GALVANIZED METAL ACCENT BASE.! ! OVERFLOW SCUPPER.! ! COLLECTION BOX AND DOWNSPOUT.! ! 2 1/2" TALL METAL REVEAL, ALIGN W/ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT,! TYPICAL. SEE DET. 02/A301! ! EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE, TYPICAL.! ! 90° ANGLE CLOSER, CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM.! ! MTL. ROLL-UP DOOR, SEE SHEET A025.! ! EXPOSED TUBE COLUMN, SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. 80º80º 80º80º 2 4 A211 01 A210 02 A211 01 A211 02 A211 02 A211 01 A 2 143 D C BA211 02 A210 01 Finish Floor±0'-0"! AFF Finish Floor±0'-0"! AFF T.O. Door+7'-0"! AFF T.O. Door+7'-0"! AFF T.O. Parapet+19'-4"! AFF T.O. Parapet+19'-4"! AFF T.O. Parapet+17'-4"! AFF T.O. Roof+15'-9"! AFF T.O. Roof+13'-3"! AFF T.O. Roof+12'-7"! AFF T.O. Parapet+17'-4"! AFF T.O. Roof+16'-6"! AFF T.O. Roof+16'-6"! AFF T.O. Roof+16'-4"! AFF B.O. Sofﬁt+13'-6 3/4"! AFF B.O. Sofﬁt+13'-6 3/4"! AFF3'-6"10'-0 1/2"3'-9"2'-0"6"6"1'-0"2'-0"2'-6"4'-9"2'-10"2'-10"2'-3"2'-3"23'-9" 8'-6"EQ.EQ.Scale: Project No.: Drawn By: CAD File: !"#$%&’()*+,-%(’,-.#,$%#,/’0*.-#’,%10’10#+-.02%-’%3.4+0#’%50("#-+(-$%.,&% #$%/)0,#$"+&%#,%(’,/#&+,(+%/’0%-"+%4#*#-+&%1)01’$+%’/%+6.4).-#’,7%8#&&#,9%’0% 0+6#+:;% !"#$% &’()*+,-% ’0% #-$% (’,-+,-$% *.2% ,’-% 8+% )$+&% /’0% .,2% ’-"+0% 1)01’$+%.,&%*.2%,’-%8+%0+10’&)(+&%’0%&#$(4’$+&%-’%’-"+0$%:#-"’)-%-"+ 10#’0%:0#--+,%(’,$+,-%’/%3.4+0#’%50("#-+(-$; Date DESCRIPTION PROJECTLICENSED ARC H I TECT * S T ATE OF CAL I F O R N IA *LIC. NO. C 24228 EXPIRES 7-30-09NICCOLO VAL E RIOCUP SUBMITTAL05/19/09 615-08-58!! HERMOSA BEACH! STORE 1286! 1439 PACIFIC COAST HWY! HERMOSA BEACH! CA 90254 A201 Exterior Elevation 1/4"=1'-0" JL CUP_Elev 2-1286 02 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" 01 WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" KEY NOTES LEGEND REFER TO KEYNOTES SHEET A200 REFER TO SHEET A025 DOOR SCHEDULE REFER TO SHEET A026 WINDOW SCHEDULE 1 1 8 A DENOTES TEMPERED GLAZING 11 101011 1.! ! ! ! 2.! ! 3.! ! 4.! ! 5.! ! 6.! ! 7.! ! 8.! ! 9.! ! 10.! ! 11.! ! 12.! ! ! 13.! ! 14.! ! 15.! ! 16. INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED REMOTE CHANNEL LETTERS.! NOTE: (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT) COORDINATE W/ CHIPOTLE SIGN VENDOR.! ! CHIPOTLE WOOD STILE AND RAIL DOORS, SEE SHEET A025.! ! LINE OF ROOF BEYOND PARAPET.! ! STUCCO, CHIPOTLE RED COLOR.! ! STUCCO, FLANNEL GREY COLOR.! ! CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM. USE CLASS 4 GLASS. ! ! GALVANIZED METAL COPING.! ! HOLLOW METAL DOOR W/ PEEP HOLE, SEE SHEET A025.! ! 8" TALL GALVANIZED METAL ACCENT BASE.! ! OVERFLOW SCUPPER.! ! COLLECTION BOX AND DOWNSPOUT.! ! 2 1/2" TALL METAL REVEAL, ALIGN W/ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT,! TYPICAL. SEE DET. 02/A301! ! EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE, TYPICAL.! ! 90° ANGLE CLOSER, CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM.! ! MTL. ROLL-UP DOOR.! ! EXPOSED TUBE COLUMN, SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. 3 3 3 12 7 7 7 7 3 3 12 9 9 13 14 13 13 13 564 5 4 8 15 A211 01 A210 02 A211 01 A211 02 A211 02 A211 01 A 21 43 DCBA211 02 A210 01 ALIGNFinish Floor±0'-0"! AFF Finish Floor±0'-0"! AFF T.O. Parapet+17'-4"! AFF T.O. Parapet+19'-4"! AFF T.O. Door+7'-0"! AFF 6"2'-0"2'-6"3'-6"10'-0 1/2"3'-9"2'-0"4'-9"4'-9"EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.8"T.O. Parapet+19'-4"! AFF B.O. Sofﬁt+13'-6 3/4"! AFF T.O. Roof+15'-9"! AFF T.O. Roof+13'-3"! AFF T.O. Roof+12'-7"! AFF T.O. Roof+12'-7"! AFF T.O. Parapet+17'-4"! AFFT.O. Roof+16'-6"! AFF 1'-0"Scale: Project No.: Drawn By: CAD File: !"#$%&’()*+,-%(’,-.#,$%#,/’0*.-#’,%10’10#+-.02%-’%3.4+0#’%50("#-+(-$%.,&% #$%/)0,#$"+&%#,%(’,/#&+,(+%/’0%-"+%4#*#-+&%1)01’$+%’/%+6.4).-#’,7%8#&&#,9%’0% 0+6#+:;% !"#$% &’()*+,-% ’0% #-$% (’,-+,-$% *.2% ,’-% 8+% )$+&% /’0% .,2% ’-"+0% 1)01’$+%.,&%*.2%,’-%8+%0+10’&)(+&%’0%&#$(4’$+&%-’%’-"+0$%:#-"’)-%-"+ 10#’0%:0#--+,%(’,$+,-%’/%3.4+0#’%50("#-+(-$; Date DESCRIPTION PROJECTLICENSED ARC H I TECT * S T ATE OF CAL I F O R N IA *LIC. NO. C 24228 EXPIRES 7-30-09NICCOLO VAL E RIOCUP SUBMITTAL05/19/09 615-08-58!! HERMOSA BEACH! STORE 1286! 1439 PACIFIC COAST HWY! HERMOSA BEACH! CA 90254 1 June 4, 2009 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission June 16, 2009 SUBJECT: PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REPLACE THREE 630-SQUARE FEET BELOW-GRADE PUBLIC RESTROOMS WITH THREE NEW 560-SQUARE FEET BELOW-GRADE PUBLIC RESTROOMS AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES (PDP 09-6) LOCATION: THREE SITES ON HERMOSA BEACH, SOUTHWEST OF TERMINUS OF 22ND, 14TH AND 2ND STREETS AT THE STRAND APPLICANT: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT) Recommendation Adopt the attached resolution approving the precise development plan/planned development permit to replace three existing restrooms on the beach with new facilities. Background GENERAL PLAN/ZONING: Beach (open Space) LOT AREA: 3 sites totaling less than 0.5 acre EXISTING / PROPOSED USE: Public restrooms /Public restrooms ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Negative Declaration The Hermosa Beach Restrooms Replacement/Rehabilitation Project (CIP No. 99-631) consists of demolition and replacement of three 630-square feet below-grade public restrooms with three new 560-square feet below-grade public restrooms with 7 stalls each, constructed within essentially the same footprint (some 90 to 109 feet seaward of the Strand) as the existing improvements. The facilities will be comprised of concrete and concrete masonry unit block walls approximately 8 feet in height, with new underground sewage holding tanks, manholes and pumps conveying wastewater via an existing sewer line. Other elements include perimeter and retaining walls, ADA complaint access ramps connecting each restroom to the Strand, downcast exterior security lighting, and relocation of the five palm trees at each existing site to a more aesthetic arrangement within each reconfigured site. The existing facilities will be demolished, sites graded (1,600 cy cut/110 cy fill), and new facilities constructed over a projected 3 to 4 month period; pedestrian protection and portable restroom facilities adjacent to each site will be provided during the construction period. The project will correct a number of existing problems: • Structures and equipment are in poor condition and an existing infiltration system is inadequate, resulting in standing water, odors, and health and environmental issues. • Design is vulnerable to flooding and sand intrusion. • Lack of security and privacy for those using the facilities. • Noncompliance of access ramps with ADA requirements. 2 The project is funded by Proposition A Open Space Grant (121), Tyco Fund (122), and Tyco Tidelands Fund (123). A Coastal Development Permit is anticipated to be required. The sites are located on the beach which is designated as 'Beach" on the General Plan and Zoning maps,1 west of multiple-family residential (R-3) at 2nd Street, the Pier and commercial downtown (C-2 and OS- Noble Park) at 14th Street, and single and limited multiple-family districts (R-1 and R-2B) at 22nd Street. The adjoining Strand and Hermosa Avenue are heavily used by beach-goers, pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicles. Analysis Planned Development Permit The proposed use is considered accessory to recreational use of the beach and Strand. Under Section 17.30.090 of the Municipal Code, the project is subject to a "planned development permit," subject to the criteria in Section 17.24.040(B) as follows: 1. The preliminary development plan conforms to the general plan: The project site, the beach, is designated Open Space in the General Plan and is compatible with its existing use. The proposed facilities will occupy approximately the same footprint as the existing restrooms, conveniently located near beach access and drop-off points identified in the Coastal Land Use Plan as focal points for access and activity. The proposed restrooms are consistent with the 'Land Use Plan Beach Development Plan' because they will maintain a low profile and are visually compatible with the landscape. Replacement will remediate water quality issues and provide ADA accessibility. Project construction will be managed so that beachgoers and others are provided alternative restroom facilities and protected from adverse impacts associated with construction. 2. The character of the proposed development will enhance the surrounding neighborhood and is desirable and will promote stability: Replacement of existing structures and equipment, which are in poor condition and do not operate properly resulting in standing water, odors, and health and environmental issues, and provision of ADA compliant facilities, will enhance the surrounding area and better serve people of all abilities. 3. Sufficient driveway widths are provided for traffic flow and maneuverability. Not applicable as the facilities are for use by pedestrians and do not require vehicle access. 4. The development will not impose a burden on access traffic facilities, and increased densities will not generate traffic in such amounts as to overload the street network outside the proposed development: The project is an accessory use and will not increase or affect vehicle trips, congestion, parking, or emergency access, while improving a public facility. Pedestrian protection measures will be put in place as required by the H.B.M.C. so that hazards are not created. 5. Adequate provision has been made for maintenance of areas of parking, open space, landscaping and recreational facilities consistent with the anticipated population of the development: The project 1 The Open Space zone in H.B.M.C. Section 17.30. 020 Permitted uses specifies it applies to: Primary open space comprises public and private areas devoted to recreational, leisure, cultural and aesthetic purposes, and includes public and private parks, including beach areas. 3 is accessory to a recreational use and supports a healthy beach environment and will improve landscaping. 6. The proposed development is not out of harmony with its surrounding neighborhood: The project will replace existing public facilities accessory to recreational uses with a more aesthetic design incorporating extensive public input, and is harmonious with the surrounding beach area. 7. Provision has been made to provide adequate ingress and egress for fire-fighting equipment: The replacement project is located on the beach and is proximate to and accessible from public roads, allowing access by fire services during and after construction. Precise Development Plan Pursuant to Section 17.58.020, a precise development plan is required because the project as a whole will involve more than 1,500 square feet of area, subject to consideration of the criteria in Section 17.58.030 as follows: 1. Distance from existing residential uses in relation to negative effects: Residential uses located in close proximity to the 2nd and 22nd Street sites will not be significantly affected because construction will be generally limited to weekday daylight hours after Labor Day, the project is of short duration, and portable toilet facilities will be provided. 2. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking in relation to actual need: As an accessory use, there is no parking demand. 3. The combination of uses proposed, as they relate to compatibility: Only one use is proposed; this use is compatible with recreational use on the beach, the Strand and Noble Park and will replace an existing dilapidated public facility with a new ADA compliant facility that remediates water quality issues. 4. The relationship of the estimated generated traffic volume and the capacity and safety of streets serving the area: As an accessory use there is no parking demand. The facilities continue to be located at beach access and drop-off points. 5. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area: Building and site designs were assisted by public input to achieve a 'natural' and aesthetic, but functional, design. 6. Building and driveway orientation in relation to sensitive uses, e.g., residences and schools: The restrooms are about 85 to 100 feet from the closest residences at 2nd and 22nd Streets. See Finding 1. 7. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use: These impacts are limited to the construction period. See Finding 1. 8. Impact of the proposed use to the city's infrastructure, and/or services: The project will replace existing facilities and will not increase water or wastewater services. Water use for landscape purposes will decrease due to elimination of some landscape; the existing palm trees which will be relocated and retained at each site. The project will generally improve security and operations, thereby potentially reducing maintenance activities by the Public Works Department. 5 Attachment 1 P.C. RESOLUTION 09-X A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH RESTROOMS REPLACEMENT/ REHABILITATION PROJECT ON THE BEACH, SOUTHWEST OF THE WESTERN TERMINUS OF 2ND, 14TH AND 22ND STREETS, HERMOSA BEACH The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by the City of Hermosa Beach Public Works Department seeking approval for a Precise Development Plan/Planned Development Permit (PDP 09-6) to replace three 630-square feet below-grade public restrooms with three new 560-square feet below-grade public restrooms with 7 stalls each, constructed within essentially the same footprint of concrete and concrete block walls, with new underground sewage holding tanks, manholes and pumps conveying waste water to an existing sewer line, perimeter and retaining walls, ADA access ramps, downcast exterior security lighting, and relocation of five palm trees at each site, known as CIP Project No. 99-631. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for a Precise Development Plan/Planned Development (PDP 09-6) on June 16, 2009, at which time testimony and evidence was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. Based on the Staff Report, testimony and evidence received, both written and oral, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The sites are zoned O-S-Beach which permits recreational uses, provided that all new construction within an O-S zone is subject to obtaining a planned development permit, and a precise development plan is required for sites exceeding 1500 square feet in size. 2. Land uses in the area include multiple-family residential (R-3) at 2nd Street, commercial downtown including Pier Plaza and the Pier (C-2 and OS- Noble Park) at 14th Street; and single and limited multiple-family districts (R-1, R-2B) at 22nd Street. 3. The project will replace structures and equipment that are in poor condition, do not gravity flow properly to sewer mains and an existing infiltration system is inadequate, resulting in standing water, odors, and health and environmental issues, and replace a design that is vulnerable to flooding and sand intrusion, lacks security and privacy for those using the facilities, and is noncompliant with ADA requirements. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: 1. Pursuant to H.B.M.C. Section 17.30.090 the proposed improvements require a planned development permit. The proposal is consistent with criteria set forth in Section 17.24.040.B as follows: 1. The preliminary development plan conforms to the general plan: The project site, the beach, is designated Open Space in the General Plan and is compatible with its existing use. The proposed facilities will occupy approximately the same footprint as the existing restrooms, conveniently located near beach access and drop-off points identified in the Coastal Land Use Plan as focal points for access and activity. The proposed restrooms are consistent with the 'Land Use Plan Beach Development Plan' because they will maintain a low profile and are visually compatible with the landscape. Replacement will remediate water quality issues and provide ADA accessibility. Project 6 construction will be managed so that beachgoers and others are provided alternative restroom facilities and protected from adverse impacts associated with construction. 2. The character of the proposed development will enhance the surrounding neighborhood and is desirable and will promote stability: Replacement of existing structures and equipment, which are in poor condition and do not operate properly resulting in standing water, odors, and health and environmental issues, and provision of ADA compliant facilities, will enhance the surrounding area and better serve people of all abilities. 3. Sufficient driveway widths are provided for traffic flow and maneuverability. Not applicable as the facilities are for use by pedestrians and do not require vehicle access. 4. The development will not impose a burden on access traffic facilities, and increased densities will not generate traffic in such amounts as to overload the street network outside the proposed development: The project is an accessory use and will not increase or affect vehicle trips, congestion, parking, or emergency access, while improving a public facility. Pedestrian protection measures will be put in place as required by the H.B.M.C. so that hazards are not created. 5. Adequate provision has been made for maintenance of areas of parking, open space, landscaping and recreational facilities consistent with the anticipated population of the development: The project is accessory to a recreational use and supports a healthy beach environment and will improve landscaping. 6. The proposed development is not out of harmony with its surrounding neighborhood: The project will replace existing public facilities accessory to recreational uses with a more aesthetic design incorporating extensive public input, and is harmonious with the surrounding beach area. 7. Provision has been made to provide adequate ingress and egress for fire-fighting equipment: The replacement project is located on the beach and is proximate to and accessible from public roads, allowing access by fire services during and after construction. 2. Pursuant to H.B.M.C. Section 17.58.020, a precise development plan is required because the project as a whole will involve more than 1,500 square feet of area. The proposal is consistent with criteria set forth in Section 17.58.030 as follows: 1. Distance from existing residential uses in relation to negative effects: Residential uses located in close proximity to the 2nd and 22nd Street sites will not be significantly affected because construction will be generally limited to weekday daylight hours after Labor Day, the project is of short duration, and portable toilet facilities will be provided. 2. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking in relation to actual need: As an accessory use, there is no parking demand. 3. The combination of uses proposed, as they relate to compatibility: Only one use is proposed; this use is compatible with recreational use on the beach, the Strand and Noble Park and will replace an existing dilapidated public facility with a new ADA compliant facility that remediates water quality issues. 4. The relationship of the estimated generated traffic volume and the capacity and safety of streets serving the area: As an accessory use there is no parking demand. The facilities continue to be located at beach access and drop-off points. 7 5. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area: Building and site designs were assisted by public input to achieve a 'natural' and aesthetic, but functional, design. 6. Building and driveway orientation in relation to sensitive uses, e.g., residences and schools: The restrooms are about 85 to 100 feet from the closest residences at 2nd and 22nd Streets. See Finding 1. 7. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use: These impacts are limited to the construction period. See Finding 1. 8. Impact of the proposed use to the city's infrastructure, and/or services: The project will replace existing facilities and will not increase water or wastewater services. Water use for landscape purposes will decrease due to elimination of some landscape; the existing palm trees which will be relocated and retained at each site. The project will generally improve security and operations, thereby potentially reducing maintenance activities by the Public Works Department. 9. Adequacy of mitigation measures to minimize environmental impacts in quantitative terms: An environmental negative declaration focusing on geologic, water and air quality, biological resources, aesthetics, noise and recreation substantiates that no significant impacts will occur as the result of the project as designed.3 10. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the planning commission, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole: None are noted. Section 4. Pursuant to the Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the project fully mitigates and will result in a less than significant impact on the environment for the reasons stated in the and Initial Study and Negative Declaration and a Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The Department of Fish and Game has approved a "No Fee Determination.' Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves Planned Development Permit/Precise Development Plan 09-6, subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The project shall be substantially consistent with the plans approved by the Planning Commission on June 16, 2009. Minor modifications to the plans required to comply with project conditions, adopted codes or Coastal Commission requirements, if any, may be approved by the Community Development Director. 2. The project shall incorporate the recommendations of the "Wave Uprush Study for Reconstruction of Three Existing Public Beach Restrooms, Hermosa Beach.” Pacific Engineering Group, March 4, 2009. 3. Portable toilet facilities easily accessible to the public placed in the general vicinity of the existing facilities will be provided during all phases of construction. 4. Construction equipment will be maintained offsite when not in use, and will be properly maintained to reduce discharge of hazardous substances. Materials will be secured and the site managed to ensure containment of materials and pollutants in compliance with H.B.M.C. 12.20.250 Pollution of Water and 8.44.090 Requirements for Industrial/Commercial and Construction Activities; requirements shall be incorporated into construction plans and management. 3 The redevelopment project will protect water quality per Chapter 8.44 but does not require Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan. 8 a. Pollutants shall be retained onsite and shall not be transported from the sites to the environment by any means. b. Dry and wet materials shall be stored under cover and protected from transport by wind or water. c. Hazardous substances necessary to work shall be stored in accordance with their listing, all approved storage containers to be protected from weather, with no contamination of soil or surface waters. d. Any spills shall be immediately contained and disposed of in a proper manner, and not washed into the drainage system. e. Non-storm water runoff shall be contained at the project site and disposed of in a proper manner. f. Concrete shall not be washed into the public way or any other drainage system and provision shall be made to retain concrete wastes onsite for proper disposal. g. Trash and construction related solid wastes shall be collected and covered to prevent contamination or dispersal. h. Sediments and other materials shall not be tracked from the site by vehicle traffic; accidental depositions shall be swept up immediately. i. Appropriate measures shall be taken to prevent discharge of effluent to the environment during demolition. 5. The applicant shall submit all required plans and reports to comply with the City’s construction debris recycling program including manifests from both the recycler and Los Angeles County landfill. 6. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by H.B.M.C. Chapter 8.24 and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments. 7. Any security lighting used during construction and in project plans shall be downcast and full cut- off, and shall not shine on neighboring properties. 8. Project construction shall protect private and public property in compliance with H.B.M.C. 15.04.070 and 15.04.140. No work in the public right of way shall commence unless and until an Encroachment Permit has been approved by the Public Works Department. 9. Prior to construction, abutting property owners and residents within 100 feet of the project site shall be notified of the anticipated date for commencement of construction. 10. Demolition and construction shall be conducted between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday (except national holidays), and 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Saturdays. Demolition, grading and exterior construction of the restroom at 2nd Street between March 1 and September 30 shall be restricted to daylight hours when illumination is not required and construction vibration and sound impacts shall be minimized. 11. The project shall comply with all other the requirements of the Zoning Code and the Building, Fire and Public Works Departments. 12. Work shall not commence until a Coastal Development Permit or exemption has been issued by the California Coastal Commission. Section 6. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. 9 VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. No. 09-X is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of June 16, 2009. Ron Pizer, Chairman Ken Robertson, Secretary June 16, 2009_______ _______ Date 10 ATTACHMENT 2 Beach Restroom Reconstruction Project Areas, Hermosa Beach 11 ATTACHMENT 3 12 Project Design 13 Existing conditions 14 15 ATTACHMENT 4 2nd St 22nd St 14th St 16 ATTACHMENT 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM –NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. Project Title: Precise Development Plan/Planned Development (PDP 09-6) for Hermosa Beach Restrooms Replacement/Rehabilitation Project (Project No. CIP 99-631) 2. Project Location: Three sites on Hermosa Beach, southwest of intersections of The Strand with 22nd, 14th and 2nd Streets, in the City of Hermosa Beach. 3. Project Sponsor: Department of Public Works, City of Hermosa Beach 4. Lead Agency : City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 5. Contact Person: Pamela Townsend, Senior Planner, Community Development Dept. - (310) 318-0242 6. General Plan Designation: Open Space (OS) 7. Zoning: Open Space – Beach (OS) 8. Description of Project: Hermosa Beach Restrooms Replacement/Rehabilitation Project (Project No. CIP 99-631) consists of replacement of three 630-square feet below-grade public restrooms with three new 560-square feet below- grade public restrooms with 7 stalls each, constructed within essentially the same footprint of concrete and CMU (concrete masonry unit) block (max 8' high walls) with new underground sewage holding tanks, manholes and pumps conveying waste water to an existing sewer line. Retaining walls, ADA access ramps connecting each restroom to the Strand, downcast exterior security lighting and relocation of 5 palm trees at each existing site within each site are included. The existing facilities will be demolished, sites graded (1,600 cy cut/110 cy fill) and new facilities constructed over a projected total 3 to 4 month period; pedestrian protection and portable facilities adjacent to each site will be provided during the construction period. The project is funded by Proposition A Open Space Grant (121), Tyco Fund (122), and Tyco Tidelands Fund (123). The project will correct a number of problems: • Structures and equipment are in poor condition and an existing infiltration system is inadequate, resulting in standing water, odors, and health and environmental issues. • Design is vulnerable to flooding and sand intrusion. • Lack of security and privacy for those using the facilities. • Noncompliance of access ramps with ADA requirements. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings: The sites are located on the beach, southwest of the terminus of 22nd, 14th and 2nd Streets at The Strand walkway. Sites are west of multiple-family residential (R-3) at 2nd Street, the Pier and commercial downtown (C-2 and OS- Noble Park) at 14th Street, and single and limited multiple-family districts (R-1 and R-2B) at 22nd Street. All are located on a heavily used beach in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. The adjoining Strand and Hermosa Avenue are heavily used by pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles. 10. Other public agencies whose approval may be required: • Coastal Development Permit, California Coastal Commission ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. 17 Land Use and Planning Transportation/Circulation Public Services Population and Housing Biological Resources Utilities and Service Systems Geological Problems Energy and Mineral Resources Aesthetics Water and Water Quality Hazards Cultural Resources Air Quality Noise Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION. On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, that there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. __________________________________ May 7, 2009____________________ Signature Date Ken Robertson, Community Development Dept. Director _____________________________ Printed Name For Others contacted: State Clearinghouse US Fish And Wildlife Service Coastal Commission Department of Fish and Game Native American Tribes Los Angles Flood Control District RWQCB 18 I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operations? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? I-a-c. The project site is designated Open Space in the General Plan, compatible with its existing use. The use and its design is compatible with the Coastal Land Use Plan and surroundings. All sites are located on a heavily used beach in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. Adjacent to the beach, the Strand and Hermosa Avenue are heavily used by pedestrians and bicyclists. The sites are located on a heavily used beach, southwest of the terminus of 22nd, 14th and 2nd Streets at The Strand walkway. Land uses in the area include: multiple-family residential (R-3) at 2nd Street, commercial downtown including Pier Plaza and the Pier (C-2 and OS- Noble Park) at 14th Street; and single and limited multiple-family districts (R-1, R-2B) at 22nd Street. Replacement of the existing restroom facilities is a continuation of an accessory use to recreational facilities. The existing and proposed restroom facilities are conveniently located near beach access and drop-off points, identified in the Coastal Land Use Plan (LUP) as focal points for access and activity (Appendix C). Maintaining restrooms at the proposed locations is consistent with their location in the LUP. The proposed restrooms are consistent with the LUP Beach Development Plan (Appendix F) because they are low profile and visually compatible with the landscape. Replacement will remediate water quality issues and provide ADA accessibility, so that disabled persons can comfortably use the beach and Strand. Project construction will be managed so that beachgoers and others in the area are provided alternative restroom facilities and protected from adverse impacts associated with construction. No significant impacts are anticipated. I-d. There are no agricultural resources in the area. No impacts are identified. I-e. The accessory use will not affect, disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community. No impacts are identified. II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? II-a, b, c. The project provides accessory facilities serving recreational uses, and will not impact or induce resident or visitor populations to visit or reside in the area. The beach and strand are well used, and the adjoining area is built out, and the facilities will continue to utilize existing water lines and discharge to existing sewer lines, such that the project will not induce future growth. Housing stock and affordability will not be affected. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? b) Seismic ground shaking? c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? 19 e) Landslides or mudflows? f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? h) Expansive soil? i) Unique geologic or physical features? IIIa-d, f-h. The proposed restrooms will be located 60 to 109 feet seaward of the Strand on the backshore beach sands, and partially below grade. The Mean High Tide line was over 358-409 feet seaward of the existing restrooms in March 2009 (Wave Uprush Study). The restrooms are designed and located to allow people to move quickly from the area in case of tsunami warning or earthquake. Restroom occupancy, seven persons per building, is low. The building and utilities will comply with Building and Floodplain Management Codes. The City manages public access to restrooms during severe storms to prevent injury or death to persons using or sheltering in them. The site is at risk of seismic activity and tsunami and flooding associated with the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone, Elysian Park Fold and Thrust Belt, Malibu Coast and Santa-Monica-Hollywood Faults, Whittier Fault, and San Andreas Fault, which could generate a credible 8.25 earthquake. Tsunami events can be generated by distant or local seismic activity or underwater landslides. The area's sand and cobble beaches experience slight changes in grade from day to day due to nature of beach sands and depositional characteristics of the wind. The existing restrooms have been periodically flooded by wave uprush during severe winter storm wave action and beach scour, storm surge is otherwise small. The Los Angeles County Engineer has established Coastal Engineering design criteria for the Los Angeles County coastline, which is very similar to the Army COE criteria in their Shoreline Protection Manual, and is accepted by the California Coastal Commission. Based on these criteria, analysis in the Wave-Uprush Study (March 2009) indicates: The useful life of the restrooms is estimated at 50 years if properly design and installed. The beach is presently a stable beach and the proposed restrooms will not impact shoreline positions compared to fluvial sediment sources. No shoreline protective device is necessary. The restroom structures at the elevations proposed will be located within in the wave uprush zone and subject to periodic storm wave uprush and avulsion beach scour during severe storm conditions. This may lead to periodic flooding of restrooms during severe storm events. The Wave-Uprush Study provides preliminary design factors, which will be incorporated into final plans: Final architectural and engineering plans will reflect a design that protects against liquefaction, lateral spreading and ground water/construction interaction, ensures geotechnical stability, and protects the facilities from storm wave uprush forces, beach scour, elevation changes, and flooding. The top of the perimeter structures shall be constructed to a minimum elevation to minimize storm wave uprush inundation from the northwest. Based on the above analysis, no significant impacts are anticipated to occur. III-e. The beach has little topographic relief. Ramp slopes are 1:12 maximum. Landslides and mudflows are not considered to be hazards in the project area. No significant impacts are anticipated. III-i. The project site (the beach) contains no unique geologic or physical features. Sources: City or Hermosa Beach General Plan, Seismic Safety Element Wave Uprush Study for Reconstruction of Three Existing Public Beach Restrooms, Hermosa Beach. Pacific Engineering Group. March 4, 2009. IV. WATER AND WATER QUALITY. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? 20 b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? f) Storm water system discharges from areas for materials storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage delivery or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas? g) A significantly harmful increase in the flow rate or volume of storm water runoff? h) A significantly harmful increase in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? i) Storm water discharges that would significantly impair the beneficial uses of receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefits? j.) Harm to the biological integrity of drainage systems and water bodies? k) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? l) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? m) Impacts to groundwater quality? n) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? IV-a. The project site contains highly absorptive materials, and the footprint of the proposed facilities is decreased compared to the existing facilities (3- 560 s.f. restroom versus 3- 630 s.f. restrooms). Drainage will be improved, resulting in elimination standing water at the facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated. IV-b, c, f, I, j. The existing and proposed restrooms are served by public sewer and water systems. The existing and proposed restrooms have been and will be periodically flooded by wave uprush during severe winter storm wave action and beach scour, and are at risk from tsunami. Restroom stalls are designed to open directly to the outside and so that any individual dysfunctional stall can be closed without contamination of the entire restroom or the environment. Since people using the project facilities are incident to activities at the beach such that use is typically low during storm conditions. The buildings and retaining walls will be oriented to the northwest designed with sufficient height to improve protection from wind-driven sand and storm surge. Building, floodplain management codes and recommendations of the Wave Uprush Study will be implemented to ensure proper drainage and containment of pollutants. Potential impacts are insignificant. Potable toilet facilities accessible to the public, placed near the existing facilities, will be provided during construction to reduce human contaminants on the beach or in the water. Construction equipment will be maintained offsite when not in use, and will be properly maintained to reduce discharge of hazardous substances. Materials will be secured and the site managed to ensure containment of materials and pollutants in compliance with HBMC 12.20.250 Pollution of Water and 8.44.090 Requirements for Industrial/Commercial and Construction Activities will be incorporated into construction plans and management. pollutants to be retained on the project sites and shall not be transported from the sites by any means. 21 dry and wet materials to be stored under cover and protected from transport by wind or water. hazardous substances necessary to work must be stored in accordance with their listing, all approved storage containers to be protected from weather, with no contamination of soil or surface waters. any spills must be cleaned up immediately and disposed of in a proper manner, and not washed into the drainage system. non-storm water runoff to be contained at the project site and disposed of in a proper manner. concrete shall not be washed into the public way or any other drainage system; provisions shall be made to retain concrete wastes onsite for proper disposal. trash and construction related solid wastes to be covered to prevent contamination or dispersal sediments and other materials shall not be tracked from the site by vehicle traffic; accidental depositions to be swept up immediately appropriate measures taken to prevent discharge of effluent to the environment during demolition additional best management practices to be implemented as deemed necessary by city inspectors Potential impacts relating to discharges and water quality are therefore insignificant. VI-d, e, g, h. The replacement of restrooms on the beach will not alter the volume of surface waters, alter ocean currents, increase or affect storm water rates or volumes, or cause erosion of the beach which is considered to be stable according to the Wave Uprush Study. No impacts are anticipated. IV-k-n. Salt-water intruded ground water is close to the surface in the project locations. Shallow excavations and grading for foundations, manholes and holding tanks will be required. Final design will comply with Floodplain Management and building codes and recommendations of the Wave Uprush Study to protect construction and facilities from groundwater intrusion and hydrostatic properties. V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any chance in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? V-a, b, d. Demolition, site preparation and construction will involve use of construction equipment to demolish and construct the facilities and crane for placement of holding tanks, grading, foundation work, and small building construction, with the potential for vehicle emissions, particulates, and odors. The near-shore environment is subject to mild to strong onshore and offshore breezes. Standard construction techniques such as watering the site as needed, maintaining equipment, turning off equipment when not in use, etc. will reduce emissions and particulates. Since construction is minor in scope and of limited duration, will avoid the peak summer season, is the project sites are 'well-ventilated', emissions, particulates and odors and their effects will be negligible. Replacement of poorly functioning restroom utility systems and improved operations will decrease standing water, and improve ventilation and reduce odors. V-c. The project sites are subject to mild to strong on and offshore breezes. Constructional activities are very limited in scope and duration, and will not affect air movement, moisture, temperature and climate. No impacts are anticipated. VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. 22 farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? VI-a-g. Restroom facilities are an accessory use and will not increase or affect vehicle trips, congestion, parking, or emergency access. The restrooms will continue to be located at focal points of activity to maximize their use. Portable toilet facilities will be provided during construction, and pedestrian protection will be employed so that hazards and barriers to bicyclists and pedestrians using the strand and accessing the beach will not be created. No impacts are identified. VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats? b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? c) Locally designed natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? VII-a, e. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has designated 10 acres south of the project as critical wintering habitat for the Pacific coast population of the western snowy plover (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus), a threatened species, pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973. This area, known as Subunit CA 21D, encompasses 0.25 linear miles of sandy open beach extending from 2nd Street to 6th Street in Hermosa Beach. The Western Snowy Plover Recovery Plan identifies the primary threats that may require special management in this subunit as: disturbance from human recreational use as well as beach raking which removes the wrack line and reduces food resources. Western snowy plovers use the beach and mobile dunes as nesting habitat. Negative impacts to their populations are associated with increased levels of illumination at night, increased sound and vibration levels, and pollution drift impact (e.g., pesticides). Impacts can be avoided by closing breeding areas to public use during the breeding season (March 1 through September 30). The project. will not have a significant effect on the western snowy plover because the project is a replacement of existing facilities located adjacent at 2nd Street over 300 feet from the mean high tide line outside the critical habitat area, construction will be limited to daylight hours when illumination is not required, construction vibration and sound impacts will be limited in duration outside the breeding season, and construction litter will be fully contained. VI-b, c d. The project sites are previously disturbed. There are no locally designated species, natural habitats or wetlands or associated environments at the subject sites. No impacts are anticipated. Source: Western Snowy Plover Recovery Plan. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/070924_2.pdf Hermosa Beach Coastal Land Use Element VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful an inefficient manner? c) Results in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the and the 23 residents of the state? VIII-a, b. The project will utilize energy during demolition, construction, and as previously continue to use energy during operation of pumps to holding tanks. The restrooms themselves are not heated or cooled. All construction waste will be recycled. The city has not adopted an energy conservation plan. No significant impacts are anticipated. VIII-c. No significant mineral deposits have been identified at this site or in the City of Hermosa Beach. Source: City of Hermosa Beach General Plan, Conservation Element. IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? IX-a, c, d. The project does not involve use or generation of hazardous substances. Proper maintenance and use of construction equipment will eliminate hazards from potential release of hazardous substances such as oil or fuels during construction. The project will decrease potential health hazards associated with the existing restrooms by replacing the existing holding tank system, stalls are designed so that any individual dysfunctional stall can be closed without contamination of the entire restroom, and the existing infiltration system for percolation of standing water below grade will be redesigned or eliminated. The sites will be secured from beachgoers by compliance Fencing and Pedestrian Protection in HBMC Section 15.04.140. No significant impacts are anticipated. IX-b. As a replacement of existing accessory facilities located on the beach, the project will not impede travel on the city’s street network or otherwise interfere with Citywide emergency response and evacuation plans. No impacts are anticipated. IX-e. The project site does not exhibit flammable brush, grass, or trees, and the project will be constructed in compliance with all applicable codes. No impacts are anticipated. X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X-a, b. The onshore environment is dominated by noise from wave and wind action. Commercial and residential development is located proximate to the project sites. The project will not increase noise levels except temporarily during construction. Demolition is anticipated by be conducted within one week. Construction will be limited to weekday daylight hours; this will reduce impacts to residences, businesses and beachgoers. No significant impacts are anticipated. XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? 24 b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e) Other governmental services? XI-d. The replacement project will not impacts fire, police or other services. The site will be managed so that dirt and debris are not tracked onto the streets or any adjacent property. The project will generally improve security and operations, thereby potentially reducing maintenance activities by city public works. No impacts are anticipated. XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? b) Communications systems? c) Local or regional water treatment/distribution facilities d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste disposal? g) Local or regional water supplies? XII-a, g. The project is served by the Los Angeles Sanitation District and West Basin Municipal Water District. The project will replace existing facilities and will not increase water or wastewater services. Water use for landscape purposes will decrease due to elimination of some landscape; the existing palm trees which will be relocated and retained at each site. XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? c) Create light or glare? XIII-a, b. Relocation of the palm trees and simplification of site design will decrease visual impacts looking westward from the Strand. The project will maintain the low profile of the existing restrooms, potentially decrease massing by placing storage tanks underground, and provide a more aesthetic design adopted as the result of a public review process. XIII-c. Low level, downcast motion sensor lighting will be positioned for security without impacting nighttime views or environment. No impacts are anticipated. XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? b) Disturb archaeological resources? c) Affect historical resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? XIV-a-e. There are no known cultural resources associated with the project sites, which have been previously disturbed. No impacts are anticipated. XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: 25 a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? XV-a-b. The project supports existing recreational opportunities by rehabilitating necessary accessory facilities. The design will create a more secure and private environment. for those using the facilities. The existing non-ADA compliant ramp access ways will be replaced by ADA compliant ramps. Portable toilets adequate in number to serve recreational demand will be provided near each construction site for the duration of the construction period. No significant impacts are anticipated. XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVI-a: The project will not impact fish or wildlife habitat because the project is replacement of existing facilities at 2nd Street over 300 feet from the mean high tide line outside critical habitat area, construction will be limited to daylight hours when illumination is not required, construction vibration and sound impacts will be limited in duration outside the breeding season, and construction litter will be fully contained. XVI-b, c: The project does not have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals or to result in cumulative impact because it is a replacement of existing accessory facilities with only short-term impacts which are not significant. XVI-d: The project does not have potential environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, 26 XVII. SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES. The following are sources used and referred to in the initial study are incorporated herein by reference. All are available for review in the Community Development Department, Planning Division of the City of Hermosa Beach, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 1. Local Coastal Land Use Plan 2. General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach 3. City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 4. Wave Uprush Study for Reconstruction of Three Existing Public Beach Restrooms, Hermosa Beach. Pacific Engineering Group. March 4, 2009. 5. Western Snowy Plover Recovery Plan. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/070924_2.pdf 27 64.71'X X X XXX X X XXRHODES STREET HILLCREST18TH STREETFD L&T ON C/LEXISTING DEED LINE1.25" S'LY OF CORNERFD L&T NO TAGPROPOSED NEW LOT LINEON W'LY PROPERTY LINEORIGINAL LOT LINE 5.91" E'LY OF CORNERSET L&T RCE 112845.75' W'LY OF CORNERON PROPERTY LINE PROD.20'20'40'40'ON PROPERTY LINE PROD.20'L&T ELEV.= 100.0620'ON PROPERTY LINE PROD.40'20'20'SET L&T RCE 112845.75' W'LY OF CORNERBRICKEXIST RESIDENCEEXIST RESIDENCEL&T @ ANGLE POINTON TOP OF BLK. WALLFD L&T RCE 1128401-366B1SURVEY & TOPOGRAPHYLINDA & STEVE BECK1852 RHODES STREETHERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254(310) 563-21801G.R. CHECKED BY:4-24-2009FORJOB NO.SHEETOFDRAWN BYDATEE N G I N EE R S3914 DEL AMO BLVD, SUITE 921 * TORRANCE, CA 90503 * (310) 542-9433ANY CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS MADE TO THIS PLAN WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF DENN ENGINEERSSHALL RELIEVE DENN ENGINEERS FROM ANY LIABILITY OR DAMAGE RESULTING FROM SUCH CHANGESOR MODIFICATIONS, INCLUDING ANY ATTORNEYS FEES OR COSTS INCURRED IN ANY PROCEEDING THATDENN ENGINEERS MAY BE JOINED.GARY J. ROEHL R.C.E. 308261852 RHODES STREETHERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254JOB ADDRESSLEGAL DESCRIPTIONN 13°26'00"W 500.26'N 76°46'36"E221.70'90.69'N 13°21'24"W 50.00'N 76°46'37"E116.64'N 76°46'37"E90.69'25.95'N 13°23'42"W 47.00' 245.26' N 13°23'42"W 50.00'90.65'N 76°46'37"E116.60'25.95'64.74'N 13°23'42"W 50.00'8'481216SCALE: 1" =052052131131231331431631731832032132232332432850050150250350450550650750850961299.47 613614619620P.C.L&T ELEV = 100.1591.0291.3391.5292.2892.42 24" TREE90.9690.9290.9692.7492.7291.61 93.7293.7993.6693.8093.7295.8695.9094.1692.0693.39 12"TREE90.8890.8491.8191.8391.8691.8791.8391.8591.9091.9692.34 96.89 TW97.06 TW96.92 TW91.8591.2691.30 91.3391.2990.4288 .29 TC90.2990.1690.1790.8190.7190.7890.7190.8291.27 91.2391.2591.2189.52 TC91.19 N.FACE88.86 FLPP91.7989.41 TX91.85 CW89.5390.8989.50 91.5588.9596.72 TW88.62HS88.5687.65 FL88.4089.0196.38 NECW88.8588.6789.8391.8989.8196.8689.9289.9390 .3590.3690.4590.6792.1493.27 90.5592.54 FF90.7791.2291.77 101.54 NFACE TW96.3895.9996.1192.5296.7793.8296.9597.7191.6994.23 95.6696.2695.7488.28 L&T 1128489.60 L&T 1128490.4390.89 TP90.4590.7190.91 90.9190.8990.9390.91LOT 39LOT 38LOT 21LOT 22RECORDED EASEMENT EXIST RESIDENCEDECKPARCEL 1: LOT 39, TRACT NO. 2548, M.B. 25-28.PARCEL 2: LOT 38, TRACT NO. 2548, M.B. 25-28, AND THE WESTERLY 25.95 FEET OF LOTS 21 AND 22, TRACT NO. 2548, M.B. 25-28.A.P.N. 4184-011-030SET L&T RCE 11284 ON TOP OF BLK WALL 2.00' W'LY & 3.00' S'LY OF PROPOSED PROPERTY CORNERSET N&T RCE 11284 IN N'LY FACE OF BLK WALL 2.00' W'LY & 0.55' S'LY OF PROPOSED PROPERTY CORNERLOT 39 LOT 21 LOT 38 LOT 22 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMFY 2009-10 BUDGETCIP NO. PROJECT NAMEGeneral FundDowntown Enhancement FundState Gas Tax FundTyco FundTyco Tidelands FundPark/Rec Facility Tax FundProp A FundProp C FundMeasure R FundCapital Improvement FundTOTAL CURRENT YEAR REQUESTTOTAL FY 2009-10 CIP FUNDING001109 115 122 123 125 145 146 147301Fund Amount04-116 Street Improvements/Pier Avenue - Hermosa Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway200,000 265,000 465,000 146 1,278,816 1,743,816 08-127 Citywide Street Improvements / Various Locations150,000 150,000 100,000 400,000 301 46,765 115 239,998 686,763 SUBTOTAL150,000 150,000 200,000 265,000 100,000 865,000 1,565,579 2,430,579 02-612 Public Works Yard Renovation / Phase 1715 991,305 991,305 99-631 Beach Restrooms Rehabilitation328,604 11,285339,889 121 250,000 122 213,547 123 168,564 972,000 06-641 Clark Building Refurbishment/ Phase 340,000 40,000 40,000 07-649 Community Center General Improvements22,549 22,549 125 113,583 301 258,224 394,356 09-659 Parking Structure Repairs 60,000 60,000 60,000 09-660 Fire Station Seismic Upgrade30,000 30,000 30,000 SUBTOTAL60,000 328,604 11,285 40,000 52,549 492,438 1,995,223 2,487,661 FUND TOTALS150,000 60,000 150,000 328,604 11,285 40,000 200,000 265,000 100,000 52,549 1,357,438 3,560,802 4,918,240 STREET AND HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTSREMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDSPUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS IMPROVEMENTS235 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: Street Improvements 145-8116-4201 146-8116-4201 PROJECT NO./TITLE: CIP 04-116 Street Improvements – Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project calls for the rehabilitation of existing pavement, construction of curbs and gutter, new storm drain facilities to correct flooding deficiencies, infiltration of dry/wet weather urban runoff to reduce pollutant loading at the beach, new transit facilities to include bus pads, transit shelters, bicycle racks, new landscaped median, street trees and streetlights, improved transit via widening of sidewalks, new shared bikeways, and parking for bicycles and alternative vehicles. JUSTIFICATION: Pier Avenue is a major destination point for many visitors coming to Hermosa Beach, leading to the Pier Plaza and the public beach areas. The project, through community-based participation and consensus, revitalizes the streetscape element of Pier Avenue along the City’s main historic downtown commercial district. The project incorporates public input and comments, environmentally friendly and sustainable (Green) elements of design. The street improvement project aims to improve walkability along Pier Avenue to support economic development. STATUS: Design is scheduled to be completed in FY 08-09. Construction is on hold pending project funding. COST TO COMPLETE PROJECT REMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDS Construction Services 300,000 146 Prop C Funds 1,278,816 Construction 4,200,000 Subtotal: 1,278,816 CURRENT REQUEST 145 Prop A Funds 200,000 146 Prop C Funds 265,000 Subtotal: 465,000 PROJECT TOTAL: 4,500,000 TOTAL FY 09-10 CIP FUNDING: 1,743,816 236 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURE DETAIL 2009-10 BUDGET Project Title/2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 Fund Expended Total Budget YTD thru Jan Year End Est Dept Request 8116 Pier Ave/Hermosa Ave to PCH 145 Proposition A Fund 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 0 0 0 200,000 Total Contract Services 0 0 0 0 200,000 Total Proposition A Fund 0 0 0 0 200,000 146 Proposition C Fund 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 3,200 1,658,816 139,977 380,000 1,543,816 Total Contract Services 3,200 1,658,816 139,977 380,000 1,543,816 Total Proposition C Fund 3,200 1,658,816 139,977 380,000 1,543,816 Total Pier Ave/Hermosa Ave to PCH 3,200 1,658,816 139,977 380,000 1,743,816 237 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: STREET AND HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS 301-8127-4201 115-8127-4201 147-8127-4201 PROJECT NO./TITLE: CIP 08-127 Citywide Street Improvements/Various Locations PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project proposes pavement rehabilitation of streets at various locations. The selection of streets is prioritized based on their respective Pavement Condition Index (PCI) established by the City’s Pavement Management Program Report. Candidates for this Fiscal Year’s Street Improvement Program are a continuation of past year’s PCI based list of streets as established in the Pavement Management Report. The project will also address limited quantities of deteriorated concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter, and drainage deficiencies. JUSTIFICATION: These streets have been identified by the City’s Pavement Management Program Report as having a PCI range of very poor to poor. (Pavement Condition Index, a numerical index ranging from 0 for failed pavement to 100 indicating pavement in perfect condition. STATUS: Design completed in FY 08-09. Construction to begin as Prop 1B funds become available. COST TO COMPLETE PROJECT REMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDS Construction Support 40,000 301 Capital Improvement Fund 46,765 Construction 360,000 115 State Gas Tax Fund 239,998 Subtotal: 286,763 CURRENT REQUEST 001 General Fund 150,000 115 State Gas Tax Fund 150,000 147 Measure R Fund 100,000 Subtotal: 400,000 PROJECT TOTAL: 400,000 TOTAL FY 09-10 CIP FUNDING: 686,763 238 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURE DETAIL 2009-10 BUDGET Project Title/2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 Fund Expended Total Budget YTD thru Jan Year End Est Dept Request 8127 Citywide St Impr/Various Locations 001 General Fund 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 0 0 0 150,000 Total Contract Services 0 0 0 0 150,000 Total General Fund 0 0 0 0 150,000 115 State Gas Tax Fund 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 244,377 4,379 4,379 389,998 Total Contract Services 0 244,377 4,379 4,379 389,998 Total State Gax Tax Fund 0 244,377 4,379 4,379 389,998 147 Measure R Fund 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 0 0 0 100,000 Total Contract Services 0 0 0 0 100,000 Total Measure R Fund 0 0 0 0 100,000 301 Capital Improvement Fund 4100 Personal Services 4102 Regular Salaries 0 14,973 8,632 14,973 0 4180 Retirement 0 3,326 1,871 3,326 0 4188 Employee Benefits 0 2,193 1,505 2,193 0 4189 Medicare Benefits 0 217 125 217 0 Total Personal Services 0 20,709 12,133 20,709 0 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 128,365 3,506 81,600 46,765 Total Contract Services 0 128,365 3,506 81,600 46,765 Total Capital Improvement Fund 0 149,074 15,639 102,309 46,765 Total Citywide St Impr/Various Locations 0 393,451 20,018 106,688 686,763 239 ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: PROJECT NO./TITLE: 991,305 991,305 991,305 991,305 PHASE 3: (FUTURE) Construction of new shop and office building. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: Public Buildings and Ground Improvements CIP 02-612 Public Works Yard Renovation, Phase 1 715-8612-4201 REMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDS 715 Equipment Replacement Fund JUSTIFICATION: STATUS: The current levels of operation and efficiency are constrained by the old facilities and the site layout. Consequently, it is difficult to conduct maintenance operations in a rapid and cost- effective manner. The old brick shop building does not meet seismic requirements. PHASE 1: Construction expected to start Summer 2009 PHASE 1: (CURRENT PHASE) Construction of the new vehicle maintenance building, retaining wall, sewer, and utilities. Demo existing vehicle shop. PHASE 2: (FUTURE) Construction of new shop building, perimeter wall, grading, paving, and other site improvements. Demo brick shop building. NONE Construction COST TO COMPLETE PROJECT TOTAL FY 09-10 CIP FUNDING: PROJECT TOTAL: CURRENT REQUEST 240 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURE DETAIL 2009-10 BUDGET Project Title/2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 Fund Expended Total Budget YTD thru Jan Year End Est Dept Request 715 Equipment Replacement Fund 8612 Public Works Yard Renovation 4100 Personal Services 4102 Regular Salaries 34,009 0 0 0 0 4180 Retirement 7,946 0 0 0 0 4188 Employee Benefits 4,346 0 0 0 0 4189 Medicare Benefits 493 0 0 0 0 Total Personal Services 46,794 0 0 0 0 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 137,436 1,019,006 1,978 27,700 991,305 Total Contract Services 137,436 1,019,006 1,978 27,700 991,305 Total Public Works Yard Renovation 184,230 1,019,006 1,978 27,700 991,305 241 ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: PROJECT NO./TITLE: 972,000 121 Prop A Fund 250,000 213,547 168,564 632,111 328,604 11,285 339,889 972,000 972,000TOTAL FY 09-10 CIP FUNDING: 123 Tyco Tidelands Fund COST TO COMPLETE PROJECT REMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDS 122 Tyco Fund Subtotal: PROJECT TOTAL: Design is in progress. Construction is expected to start Summer 2009. Additional funds are needed to bring project budget in line with the current construction estimate of $324,000 per restroom. Public Buildings and Ground Improvements CIP 99-631 Beach Restrooms Rehabilitation PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconstruction of beach restrooms at: 2nd Street at The Strand 14th Street at The Strand 22nd Street at The Strand JUSTIFICATION: STATUS: 121-8631-4201 122-8631-4201 123-8631-4201 122 Tyco Fund Subtotal: Construction CURRENT REQUEST 123 Tyco Tidelands Fund The restrooms are over 30 years old and in a state of disrepair. Restrooms became the City’s responsibility as part of the contract with L.A. County Lifeguards. The County of Los Angeles is committing $250,000 toward this project. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: 242 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURE DETAIL 2009-10 BUDGET Project Title/2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 Fund Expended Total Budget YTD thru Jan Year End Est Dept Request 8631 Beach Restroom Rehabilitation 121 Prop A Open Space Fund 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 250,000 0 0 250,000 Total Contract Services 0 250,000 0 0 250,000 Total Prop A Open Space Fund 0 250,000 0 0 250,000 122 Tyco Fund 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 252 213,547 0 0 542,151 Total Contract Services 252 213,547 0 0 542,151 Total Tyco Fund 252 213,547 0 0 542,151 123 Tyco Tidelands Fund 4100 Personal Services 4102 Regular Salaries 20,540 0 0 0 0 4180 Retirement 4,798 0 0 0 0 4188 Employee Benefits 2,247 0 0 0 0 4189 Medicare Benefits 298 0 0 0 0 Total Personal Services 27,883 0 0 0 0 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 28,127 243,432 15,446 74,868 179,849 Total Contract Services 28,127 243,432 15,446 74,868 179,849 Total Tyco Tidelands Fund 56,010 243,432 15,446 74,868 179,849 Total Beach Restroom Rehabilitation 56,262 706,979 15,446 74,868 972,000 243 ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: PROJECT NO./TITLE: Phase 3 Design 40,000 360,000 40,000 400,000 40,000 Public Buildings and Ground Improvements CIP 06-641 Clark Building Refurbishment – Phase 3 Phase 1: (COMPLETED FY 06-07) Paint auditorium and refinish wood floor. Phase 2: (COMPLETED FY 08-09) Repair / replace windows & doors, patch and paint exterior, install new exterior lighting. Phase 3: (FY 09-10) Renovate the kitchen, restrooms, storage areas, and stage, including mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Improve interior lighting, acoustics, and install a sound system. (Phase 3 will complete the renovation work that has been on-going since 2006.) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 125-8641-4201 CURRENT REQUEST 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund JUSTIFICATION: STATUS: The existing kitchen, restrooms, and storage areas are in poor condition. The plumbing and electrical systems need to be replaced. The acoustics and lighting in the auditorium are poor. Phase 1: Completed FY 06-07 Phase 2: Completed FY 08-09. Phase 3: FY 09-10. Phase 3 Construction TOTAL FY 09-10 CIP FUNDING: COST TO COMPLETE PROJECT REMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDS PROJECT TOTAL: 244 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURE DETAIL 2009-10 BUDGET 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 Project Title/Expended Total Budget YTD thru Jan Year End Est Dept Request Fund 8641 Clark Building Refurbishment/Phase 3 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 4100 Personal Services 4102 Regular Salaries 5,080 0 0 0 0 4180 Retirement 1,187 0 0 0 0 4188 Employee Benefits 649 0 0 0 0 4189 Medicare Benefits 74 0 0 0 0 Total Personal Services 6,990 0 0 0 0 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 15,252 166,693 111,436 166,693 40,000 Total Contract Services 15,252 166,693 111,436 166,693 40,000 Total Clark Building Refurbishment 22,242 166,693 111,436 166,693 40,000 245 ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: PROJECT NO./TITLE: 394,356 113,583 258,224 371,807 22,549 394,356 394,356 Public Buildings and Ground Improvements CIP 07-649 Community Center General Improvements Improvements to the facility, including removal of stairs on the west side of the building, interior paint, window treatments, new flooring, and other improvements as needed. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: JUSTIFICATION: STATUS: Old building in need of refurbishment. Construction contract was awarded 02/24/09. PROJECT TOTAL: 301 Capital Improvement Fund CURRENT REQUEST 301 Capital Improvement Fund Subtotal: 125-8649-4201 301-8649-4201 TOTAL FY 09-10 CIP FUNDING: COST TO COMPLETE PROJECT REMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDS 125 Parks & Recreation FundConstruction 246 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURE DETAIL 2009-10 BUDGET 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 Project Title/Expended Total Budget YTD thru Jan Year End Est Dept Request Fund 8649 Comm Ctr General Improvements 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 113,583 0 0 113,583 Total Contract Services 0 113,583 0 0 113,583 Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 0 113,583 0 0 113,583 301 Capital Improvement Fund 4100 Personal Services 4102 Regular Salaries 5,067 11,147 12,513 11,147 0 4180 Retirement 1,184 2,454 2,750 2,454 0 4188 Employee Benefits 916 1,543 1,977 1,543 0 4189 Medicare Benefits 74 162 181 162 0 Total Personal Services 7,241 15,306 17,421 15,306 0 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 9,567 310,840 6,768 100,000 280,773 Total Contract Services 9,567 310,840 6,768 100,000 280,773 Total Capital Improvement Fund 16,808 326,146 24,189 115,306 280,773 Total Comm Ctr General Improvements 16,808 439,729 24,189 115,306 394,356 247 ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: PROJECT NO./TITLE: Consultant 20,000 40,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 109-8659-4201 TOTAL FY 09-10 CIP FUNDING: Phase 1 Spot Repairs CURRENT REQUEST JUSTIFICATION: COST TO COMPLETE PROJECT REMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDS PROJECT TOTAL: 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund STATUS: The parking structure is approximately ten years old and beginning to degrade in the marine environment. Timely repairs may minimize damage and reduce the need for future maintenance and repairs. Items showing signs of deterioration include the concrete deck, exposed metal work, and surface painting. Phase 1: FY 09-10 Phase 2: FY 10-11 Public Buildings and Ground Improvements CIP 09-659 Parking Structure Repairs Phase 1: (FY 09-10) Assess the condition of the parking structure and make spot repairs to minimize deterioration. Phase 2: (FUTURE) Implement recommendations from Phase 1 assessment. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: 248 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURE DETAIL 2009-10 BUDGET 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 Project Title/Expended Total Budget YTD thru Jan Year End Est Dept Request Fund 109 Downtown Enhancement Fund 8659 Parking Structure Repairs 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 0 0 0 60,000 Total Contract Services 0 0 0 0 60,000 Total Parking Structure Repairs 0 0 0 0 60,000 249 ACCOUNT NO.: CATEGORY: PROJECT NO./TITLE: 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000TOTAL FY 09-10 CIP FUNDING: Consultant CURRENT REQUEST 301 Capital Improvement Program COST TO COMPLETE PROJECT REMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDS PROJECT TOTAL: JUSTIFICATION: STATUS: The Fire Station was originally designed to meet 1958 building code requirements. A second floor was added in 1980 which compromised the integrity of the original design. In the current configuration, the structure may not perform adequately in a seismic event. FY 09-10 Public Buildings and Ground Improvements CIP 09-660 Fire Station Seismic Upgrade Seismic upgrade to Fire Station structure. Current project scope includes consulting fees to prepare a construction plan but does not include cost of construction. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 301-8660-4201 250 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURE DETAIL 2009-10 BUDGET 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 Project Title/Expended Total Budget YTD thru Jan Year End Est Dept Request Fund 8660 Fire Station Seismic Upgrade 301 Capital Improvement Fund 4200 Contract Services 4201 Contract Serv/Private 0 0 0 0 30,000 Total Contract Services 0 0 0 0 30,000 Total Fire Station Seismic Upgrade 0 0 0 0 30,000 251 Tentative Future Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION City of Hermosa Beach JULY 21, 2009 Project Title Public Notice Meeting Date Date Rec’d Remarks ⇒ Housing Element update study session 7/9 7/21 5/21 ⇒ Text Amendment to allow small wind energy systems as a conditional use in all zones, and to allow said systems to exceed the height limit, subject to standards, and adoption of Neg. Dec. 7/9 7/21 5/21 ⇒ 1081, 1085 & 1087 Aviation Blvd—PDP & Parking Plan for a 3-story 40-room hotel with 2 levels of parking containing 42 parking spaces with 32 of the 40 required spaces in tandem to be managed with 24-hour valet parking service & to allow greater than 30% compact parking. & Neg. Dec. (cont’d from 1/20, 3/17 & 6/16). 7/9 7/21 6/11 ⇒ 526 25th Street—Precise Development Plan for a new 3-story duplex, total 4.615 sq. ft. habitable space in R-1A zone. 7/9 7/21 6/11 F:b93\cd\wpc - future agenda 15b 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION APRIL, 2009 MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT NUMBER OF PERMITS TYPE OF ACTIVITY CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE BUILDING 33 60 442 527 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 19 41 295 391 ELECTRIC 21 32 223 302 PLAN CHECK 8 19 165 232 SEWER USE 0 0 6 3 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 16 11 106 145 PARKS & RECREATION 0 0 1 1 IN LIEU PARKS & REC 0 0 2 5 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 2 SIGN REVIEW 2 1 22 27 FIRE FLOW FEES 3 7 57 65 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 0 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 0 2 9 10 COMMERCIAL INSPECTION 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 102 173 1,328 1,710 FEES COLLECTED TYPE OF FEE CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE BUILDING $14,123.31 $51,100.23 $279,853.71 $386,952.94 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL $3,319.00 $6,543.00 $49,135.50 $69,081.00 ELECTRIC $5,350.00 $8,751.00 $48,293.70 $61,510.80 PLAN CHECK $3,665.05 $14,386.41 $128,854.55 $282,805.33 SEWER USE $0.00 $0.00 $18,478.90 $4,873.00 RES. BLDG. REPORTS $3,888.00 $2,607.00 $25,626.60 $33,875.00 PARKS & RECREATION $0.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 IN LIEU PARKS & REC $0.00 $0.00 $21,192.00 $91,768.00 BOARD OF APPEALS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,004.00 SIGN REVIEW $492.00 $240.00 $5,370.00 $6,382.00 FIRE FLOW FEES $787.00 $10,615.00 $59,322.50 $69,119.50 LEGAL DETERMINATION $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ZONING APPEALS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TEMPORARY SIGN $0.00 $498.00 $2,271.00 $2,460.00 COMMERCIAL INSPECTION $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TOTALS $31,624.36 $94,740.64 $641,898.46 $1,013,331.57 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF APRIL, 2009 TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS DWELLING UNITS VALUATION 1 101 NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES DETACHED 2 102 NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES ATTACHED 3 103 NEW TWO FAMILY BUILDINGS 4 104 NEW 3 OR 4 FAMILY BUILDINGS 5 105 NEW 5 OR MORE FAMILY BUILDINGS 6 213 NEW HOTELS/MOTELS 7 214 NEW OTHER NON HOUSEKEEPING 8 318 NEW AMUSEMENT & RECREATION 9 319 NEW CHURCHS/OTHER 10 320 NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS 11 321 NEW PARKING GARAGES. 12 322 NEW SERVICE STATIONS/REPAIR GARAGES 13 323 NEW HOSPITALS/OTHER INSTITUTIONAL 14 324 NEW OFFICES/BANKS 15 325 NEW PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITY BUILDINGS 16 326 NEW SCHOOLS/OTHER EDUCATIONAL 17 327 NEW STORES/OTHER MERCH BLDGS. 18 328 NEW OTHER NON RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS 19 329 NEW STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BUILDING 20 434 ADD/ALTER DWELLING/POOLS 27 $541,967.72 21 437 ADD/ALTER NON RESIDENTIAL 5* $517,500* 22 438 RESIDENTIAL GARAGES/CARPORTS 23 645 DEMOLITION-SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES 24 646 DEMO 2-FAMILY BUILDINGS 25 647 DEMO 3-4 FAMILY BUILDINGS 26 648 DEMO 5+ FAMILY BUILDINGS 27 649 DEMO ALL OTHER BUILDINGS 32 $1,059,467.72 *Including a no fee permit $450,000 in valuation for the Community Center improvement project. TOTAL UNITS ADDED FY 2008-09 TO DATE: 20 TOTAL UNITS DEMOLISHED/LOST FY TO DATE: 19 (See Attached List) TOTAL NET UNITS FY TO DATE: 1 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Total New Dwelling Units: 50 Total New Dwelling Units: 56 Total Demolished Units: 29 Total Demolished Units: 66 Net Units: 21 Net Units: -10 3 Dwelling Units Demolished/Lost as of April, 2009 ADDRESS TYPE PERMIT DATE PERMIT NO. NO. OF UNIT 352 28th Street SFR 7/3/08 B08-315 1 2054 Manhattan Avenue SFR 7/8/08 B08-323 1 2117 Power Street SFR 7/24/08 B08-350 1 2826 The Strand SFR 7/24/08 B08-352 1 670 Longfellow Avenue Converting a Duplex to SFR 7/29/08 B08-221 1 628 Gould Avenue SFR 8/21/08 B08-387 1 2438 Palm Drive SFR 8/25/08 B08-391 1 457 31st Street SFR 9/18/08 B08-441 1 312 The Strand Duplex 10/27/08 B08-499 2 421 Monterey Blvd. Triplex 12/9/08 B08-567 3 1920 Springfield Avenue SFR 12/23/08 B08-580 1 1120 8th Street SFR 12/31/08 B08-588 1 726 Prospect Avenue 2 Units on Lot 12/31/08 B08-589 2 2021 Monterey Blvd. SFR 1/27/09 B09-28 1 321 31st Street Converting a Duplex to SFR 4/7/09 B07-492 1 Total Units Demolished 19 4 May 5, 2009 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL May 26, 2009 ACTIVITY REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION APRIL, 2009 STAFF REPORT PREPARED SUBJECT THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE APPEAL / RECONSIDERATION 0 2 6 8 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) - CONDOMINIUMS 0 1 2 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) - COMMERCIAL 0 1 5 7 C.U.P./PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 5 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION 0 1 2 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MAP EXTENSION 1 2 4 7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 1 0 FINAL MAP 2 0 8 5 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 0 1 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 0 0 0 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 1 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 0 0 0 0 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 0 4 2 PARKING PLAN 1 1 1 4 SPECIAL STUDY 0 0 0 2 VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 0 0 0 2 TEXT AMENDMENT 1 1 20 11 TRANSIT 0 0 0 1 VARIANCE 0 1 1 7 ZONE CHANGE 0 0 0 1 MISCELLANEOUS 7 4 50 63 TOTAL REPORTS PREPARED 13 14 109 131 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once. Easy Reader Run Date: June 4, 2009 DISPLAY Acct: 7010-2110 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach shall hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, to consider the following: 1. Variance to the sign code to allow the installation of a double faced sign, 23 square feet per face with a maximum height of six feet in the R-1 zone, at 1818 Monterrey Boulevard, St. Cross Episcopal Church. 2. Legal Determination of whether two (2) dwelling units exist and whether the 2nd unit (rear apartment over garage) is legal nonconforming and may continue to exist at 450 30th Street. 3. Conditional Use Permit to allow approximately 500 square foot of outdoor patio dining in conjunction with a new restaurant, “Chipotle” (formerly IHOP) at 1439 Pacific Coast Highway. 4. Precise Development Plan/Planned Development for Hermosa Beach Restrooms Replacement Project (Project No. CIP 99-631) to replace three 630-square foot public restroom facilities with three 560 square foot facilities, including demolition, grading, construction, installation of wastewater holding tanks and related utility hookups, landscaping and lighting, located southwest of the intersection of The Strand with 22nd, 14th and 2nd Streets, and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration. 5. Text amendment modifying sign regulations relating to temporary signs, real estate signs and construction signs (continued from the May 19, 2009 meeting). SAID PUBLIC HEARING shall be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate and speak at this hearing at the above time and place. For inclusion in the agenda packet to be distributed, written comments of interested parties should be submitted to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, in care of City Hall at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 prior to Thursday, June 11, 2009, at 12:00 noon. All written testimony by any interested party will be accepted prior to or at the scheduled time on the agenda for the matter. IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, at, or prior to, the public hearing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Community Development Department, Planning Division, at (310) 318-0242 or fax to (310) 937-6235. The Department is open from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday. Please contact a staff planner to discuss any project on the Planning Commission agenda. A copy of the staff report(s) in the Planning Commission packet will be available for public review at the end of the business day on Thursday, June 11, 2009, at the Hermosa Beach Police Department, Public Library, and, on the City’s web site at www.hermosabch.org. Relevant Municipal Code sections are also available on the web site. Ken Robertson, Director Community Development Department f:95\cclerk\legads\display\2009\planning\pc06-16-09 12 Project Design 13 Existing conditions 14 15 ATTACHMENT 4 2nd St 22nd St 14th St