HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution 08-45 - (134-142 PCH)RESOLUTION NO.08-45
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PARKING PLAN
AMENDMENT TO ALLOW A 240 SQUARE FOOT STORAGE BUILDING FOR
'O'KELL'S FIREPLACE' WITHOUT THE PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL
PARKING WITHIN SHARED PARKING AREA, AT 134 AND 142 PACIFIC
COAST HIGHWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 43, 44, 45, AND 46, HOME
BUILDERS' PLACE TRACT, HERMOSA BEACH
The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows:
Section 1. An application was filed by F. Richard DiGiorgio for Parking Plan Amendment 08-4
to allow the addition of a 240 square foot storage building for O'Kell's Fireplace without the provision
of additional parking within shared parking area.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the
application for the Parking Plan Amendment on October 21, 2008.
Section 3. The project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act,
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, since the proposal involves the addition of two storage
buildings totaling of 240 square feet located on an existing parking lot in conjunction with an existing
building located in an urbanized area.
Section 4. Based on the testimony and evidence received, the Planning Commission makes the
following factual findings:
1. O'Kell's Fireplace (134 Pacific Coast Highway) shares a 16 stall parking lot with Saint Rocke
(142 Pacific Coast Highway).
2. Both O'Kell's Fireplace and Saint Rocke are non -conforming to the parking requirements for
retail sales (1 parking space for every 250 square feet of gross floor area) and bar/lounges (1
parking space for every 80 square feet of gross floor area).
3. The level of non -conformity to parking requirement was reduced in 2007 when the parking
area was expanded from 8 stalls to 16 stalls by converting 830 2"d Street into part of the
parking lot. The expansion was approved by the Commission on August 21, 2007 by the
adoption of P.C. Resolution 07-40.
4. P.C. Resolution 07-40, Conditions of Approval, Item 6, requires removal of a storage building
along the southerly property line. The applicant did not remove the storage building and is in
violation of the Condition.
5. The applicant is requesting to retain the existing 120 square feet storage building made of pre -
manufactured roofed framing and plywood sheathing structure with metal shelves, and to add
a new storage building of same size and materials in the parking area along the southerly
property line. The site will contain two storage buildings with 120 square feet each.
6. An 1-hour fire separation wall must be provided between the storage buildings and the
Verizon Wireless facility.
Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings and pursuant to H.B.M.C. Section
17.44.210, the Planning Commission hereby finds that allowing the expanded storage area without
additional parking is appropriate and substantiated by the following facts:
The storage buildings do not increase intensity of use and use is unique because the
specialized products and services of this business require large amounts of storage in relation
to occupancy.
2. The storage buildings do not impact parking stall or drive aisle radius dimensions or materially
affect parking.
3. As conditioned, parking stalls in front of the storage buildings will be available to customers
during the hours each business is open and the parking stalls will not be occupied by
merchandise or otherwise unavailable, in order to facilitate parking and use of the adjacent
spaces.
Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Parking
Plan Amendment to allow additional storage without required parking subject to the following
Conditions of Approval:
1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted
plans received and reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting of October 21,
2008. Modifications which do not reduce the number of parking stalls shall be reviewed
and may be approved by the Community Development Director. This permit as amended
shall not be in effect until all of the Conditions have been fully implemented and approved
by the Community Development Director.
2. Parking stalls fronting the storage buildings must be available for use by customer and
employee parking at all times Okeli's Fireplace and Saint Rocke are open.
3. Forklift and other moving equipments may park in the stalls fronting the storage buildings on
temporary basis only for ease of maneuvering or retrieving merchandise to/from the storage
buildings.
4. No merchandise shall occupy parking stalls.
5. All merchandise shall be maintained or stored inside a screened structure (i.e. storage building
or inside business).
6. The applicant shall provide directional signage clearly indicating that the parking lot is for
both O'Kell's Fireplace and Saint Rocke's customers. Spaces shall not be reserved for the
exclusive use of either business.
7. A parking management plan shall be submitted for review and approved by the Community
Development Director to ensure the parking efficiency of the parking lot and the addition of
storage buildings do alleviate merchandise storage issues related to the business.
Section 6. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of
the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development
Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this
grant.
The Parking Plan Amendment shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to
be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable.
Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any
claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void
or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of the State
Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and
the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any
claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no
thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.
The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to
pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the
permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own
expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any
obligation under this condition.
The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions
of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity
on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full
compliance shall be a violation of these conditions.
The Planning Commission may review this Parking Plan Amendment and may amend the subject
conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the
neighborhood resulting from the subject use.
Section 7. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the
decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90
days after the final decision by the City Council.
VOTE: AYES: Hoffman, Pizer, Darcy, Allen and Chairman Perrotti
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 08-45 is a true and complete record of the action taken by
the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of October
21, 2008.
Sam Perrotti, Chairman --' en Robeftson, Secretary
October 21 2008
Date