HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 92-20 (2954 and 2960 La Carlita Pl)'
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
P.C. RESOLUTION 92-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF AN OVER-HEIGHT WALL ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINES
OF 2954 & 2960 LA CARLITA PLACE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 22 AND
23 OF TRACT NO. 15243.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on
March 17, 1992 to receive oral and written testimony regarding an
application for a Conditional Use Permit at 2954 & 2960 Pacific
Coast Highway and made the following findings:
A. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to
authorize the construction of an over-height concrete block
wall approximately nine (9) feet high and the later addition
of decorative fencing up to six (6) feet over and above said
masonry wall;
B. The use of the higher wall is necessary to mitigate both
noise and visual impact from the adjacent nonresidential use;
C. The greater height will not be detrimental to neighboring
property or to the public welfare, and will not interfere
with the light, air and scenic view of other pr~perties;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning_Commission
of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a
Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of an
over-height wall along the east property lines of 2954 & 2960 La
Carlita Place, subject to the following:
SECTION I Conditions of Approval
1. The location of structures and features on the property shall
be in substantial conformance with submitted plans as revised
-1 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
in accordance with the conditions below; any modification
shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval.
2. The concrete block wall shall not be over ten (10) feet in
height and the decorative fencing to be added in accordance
with Resolution P.C. 92-8 shall not extend more than six (6)
feet above the proposed block wall.
3. The finished wall shall be either split face block, stucco,
or other decorative material as approved by the Planning
Director. Plain gray block is prohibited.
4. Plans for the wood fencing proposed above the block wall
shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and
approval prior to construction.
5. The Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void if not
executed within two (2) years from the date of approval.
SECTION II
Each of the above conditions is separately enforced,
of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid
of law, all the other conditions shall remain
enforceable.
and if any
by a court
valid and
Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which
action is brought within the applicable time period of Government
Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee
of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate
fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the
permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City
fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not
thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless
the City.
The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and
attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result
of any claim or action brought against the City because of this
grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in
an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at
its own expense in the defense of the action, but such
participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation
under this condition.
The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated
in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law,
statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any
development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the
permittee to cease any development or activity not in full
compliance shall be a violation of these conditions.
-2 -
..,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
g
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION III
Any violation of the conditions of approval and/or violation of
the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code may be grounds for a public
hearing for the revocation of the conditional use permit.
The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit
and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditicms
if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the
neighborhood resulting from the subject use.
VOTE: AYES: Comms.Di Monda,Marks,Merl,Chmn.Ketz
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Comm.Suard
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 92-20 is a true
and complete record of the action taken by the Planning
Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their
regular me~ting of March 17, 1992.~~· ./.,~.J , ~,.,
rl_( I ~ .-,, ///c ,LP}'_A __,/' l . '" A _1,;;:;.__ t' , --~ ~/;hf!? ~
Cnristine Ketz~ Chairperson Michael Schubach;7 Secretary
·fl..,. t, l 7. I '7 'i ,._. I Datie p/pcrs2960
-3 -