Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBZA Resolution 154-408 - (2321 Hermosa Ave)RESOLUTION B.Z.A. 154-408 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GRANTING A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2321 HERMOSA AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Hermosa Beach, at a public hearing held on April 6th, 1981, in the Council Chambers of the City Han, considered the request of Mr. Richard Saxon for permission to add more than 40% to an existing single family dwelling, with nonconforming sideyards and to maintain the nonconforming sideyards with the new addition, on property legally described as Lot 11, Bleak 24, Hermosa Beach Tract; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the following facts were presented for consideration: that the southerly sideyard is 2' 611 ; that the northerly sideyard is 21 811 ; that the new addition will be 111%; that Building Department inspection revealed existing dwelling to be in conformance with plans submitted; that the existing single family residence is very small and the request be granted subject to a deed restriction; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the applicant asked the Board 1f there was sufficient potential to ask for a deed restriction, he would prefer not to have such a restriction; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the applicant~s representative stated that there is virtually no way to divide the structure into apartments without closing off complete access to the first floor bedroom, bathroom and stairway; and WHEREAS, after due consideration, it is the opinion of the Board of Zoning Adjustments that the variance is justified, subject to conditions, for the following reasons: 1. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved because the request is similar to other side yard setback approvals, the building pre-dates 1944 and there is no change in the footprint of the building. 2. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question because many other properties in the same vicinity and zone exist in relatively minor nonconformity with sideyard clearances and many properties in the same vicinity and zone have been permitted upward extensions of that variance. 3. That the granting of such variance willnot be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located because that reasonable fire and safety access is not impeded by the project because the ground floor clearance.-is not affected. 4. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the compre- hensive General Plan because the use of the property is maintained as a single family residence in the R-3 zone with a deed restriction. J ... Page 2 -RESOLUTION B.Z.A. 154-408 AND, FURTHER that this request is subject to following condition: 1. A deed restriction to be executed limiting the use of the property to a single family residence. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that in view of the above findings of fact, the Board of Zoning Adjustments does hereby grant the variance request by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Absent: Comms. Ebey, Merrill, Moore, Toth, Williams None Comm. Walker, DeBellis CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution BZA 154-408 was adopted by the Board of Zoning Adjustments at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of April, 1981. DATE CARL MOORE, ACTING CHAIRMAN JUNE WILLIAMS, ACTING SECRETARY