HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-08-08 PC Action Minutes Special MeetingCity Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA
90254
City of Hermosa Beach
Action Minutes - Final
Planning Commission
Chair
David Pedersen
Vice Chair
Stephen Izant
Commissioners
Peter Hoffman
Rob Saemann
Marie Rice
6:00 PMMonday, August 8, 2022
I. CALL TO ORDER
The Planning Commission Special Meeting was held virtually pursuant to
Executive Order AB 361 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on September 16,
2021. The meeting was called to order by Chair David Pedersen at 6:02 pm.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chair Pedersen.
III. ROLL CALL
Chair David Pedersen, Vice Chair Stephen Izant, Commissioner Rob Saemann,
Commissioner Peter Hoffman, and Commissioner Marie Rice
Present:5 -
Absent:0
All Planning Commission members attended in-person in the Council Chambers.
Also attending in-person:
Jeannie Naughton, Community Development Director
Christy Teague, Senior Planner
Melanie Hall, Interim Associate Planner
Johnathon Masi, Assistant Planner
Melanie Bristow, Administrative Assistant
Attending remotely:
Patrick Donegan, Assistant City Attorney
IV. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -- ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Page 1City of Hermosa Beach
August 8, 2022Planning Commission Action Minutes - Final
a.REPORT
22-0503
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
(Administrative Assistant Melanie Bristow)
The following people provided public comment:
1. Brian Dunn (in-person)
2. Laura Pena (virtually)
3. Jon David (virtually)
Motion by Commissioner Rice and seconded by Commissioner Hoffman to
receive and file written communications.
Motion carried as follows:
Aye:Chair Pedersen, Vice Chair Izant, Commissioner Saemann, Commissioner Hoffman,
and Commissioner Rice
5 -
Absent:0
V. REVIEW AND DISCUSSION
a.REPORT
22-0504
INFORMATION ONLY: PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE
(Administrative Assistant Melanie Bristow)
b.REPORT
22-0499
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE:
DISTRICT AND DESIGN STANDARDS
(Assistant Planner Melanie Hall)
Martha Miller of Miller Planning Associates presented a presentation on the
district and design standards. She also did a review of what was discussed
during the July special meeting of the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Saemann began questioning session by asking if the discretionary
allowance includes the finding of air and light and if so, would it be possible to
remove that allowance. Saemann said he was unsure of where the allowance of
air & light came from. Chair Pedersen said he approves of the allowance of air &
light. Commissioner Hoffman stated that the issue comes up very rarely and can
be handled on a case-by-case basis. Vice Chair Izant and Commissioner Rice
both support it as it is currently written.
Regarding requiring a 14-foot minimum ground floor height in Commercial
Zones, Commissioner Hoffman inquired if there is a minimum in the existing
standard. Consultant Martha Miller said there is in fact a 12-foot minimum
currently. Commissioner Hoffman believes they should allow flexibility. The
Commissioners all agreed on eliminating the 14-foot minimum ground floor
height requirement in Commercial Zones.
Vice Chair asked how the Planning Commission can proceed on modifying the
allowable FAR. Chair Pedersen suggested to bring back the question regarding
the allowable FAR during another meeting. Chair Rice agreed and said they
should compile a list of items to bring back for discussion, then bring to Council.
Page 2City of Hermosa Beach
August 8, 2022Planning Commission Action Minutes - Final
Planning Commission all agreed upon this.
During Local Designer Input, the Planning Commission showed surprise and
disappointment with the lack of participation from local businesses in providing
feedback. Chair Pedersen asked Staff what the next steps in order are to get
more input. Vice Chair Izant said he felt that Staff did a good job trying to obtain
feedback from local businesses. Commissioner Rice said she can see the effort
that was put into putting together a menu of options for style standards. She
appreciates the welcoming exterior but would rather see a list of what they do
not want to see, as opposed to a list of what is permissible. Chair Pedersen
stepped in and directed the conversation back to focusing on encouraging
feedback from the local business community.
Senior Planner Christy Teague summarized the staff efforts to get public
feedback from both businesses and residents. Most feedback received was for
Single-Family, and not for Commercial or Multi-Family.
Commissioner Hoffman noted that all three public comments provided today
were members from the Stakeholders group of the Economic Development
Committee. He said this process of appeal does indeed affect costs and that
should not be ignored.
Chair Pedersen officially moved the group to items five and six, Design
Standards & Modification Process. Commissioner Saemann feels that moldings,
projections, etc. should not be required. He said it should be more clearly
defined by what they do not want to see, and not what they do want to see.
Chair Pedersen questioned if the Modification Process is agreeable. He feels that
it is an agreeable modification process but that more details need to be added.
Vice Chair Izant agreed with Chair Pedersen’s comments. Commissioner
Hoffman asked Community Director Jeannie Naughton how he would know if his
neighbor was undergoing a modification process? Director Naughton explained
the public notification process. She stated that the process can be modified to set
up a more efficient review process. Director Naughton said that a timeline for a
smaller project that did not need Planning Commission approval would take
approximately two months or less. This timeline includes the appeal process
timeline. Costs would be incurred for mailings and staff time. Commissioner
Saemann asked what the current process is to request a modification in design
standards. Director Naughton stated that currently there are no SFR standards or
objective design standards in place. She also suggested that it be kept in mind
that objective design standards do provide assurance and confidence in knowing
what can and can’t be built. Director Naughton suggested separating
multifamily/commercial and single-family residences. Chair Pedersen questioned
again if this is a fair modification process. Vice Chair Izant, Chair Pedersen and
Commissioner Rice agreed that this is a fair modification process. Commissioner
Hoffman and Commissioner Saemann both felt this is not a fair modification
process.
During Single Unit Development, Chair Pedersen asked what percentage of
houses that are already built in Hermosa would fit into these standards. Interim
Associate Planner Melanie Hall responded that although that percentage is not
known, the photo examples included in the presentation are all current houses in
Hermosa. Martha Miller suggested that they may want to state a limit of blank
wall lengths. Commissioner Saemann asked if it is necessary to go into detail on
what defines a change of material. Vice Chair Izant felt that it would be better to
Page 3City of Hermosa Beach
August 8, 2022Planning Commission Action Minutes - Final
provide articulations than to say what they do not want to see. Commissioner
Rice agreed with Vice Chair Izant.
Chair Pedersen decided to call for a consensus on what items to keep and what
items to eliminate.
For Single Unit Development, the Planning Commission reached a consensus to
delete 1. Building Entrances and 2. Window Trim/Recess, and to keep but modify
3. Articulation.
For Multi-Unit Developments, the Planning Commission reached a consensus to
delete 3. Window Trim or Recess, and to keep 1. Building Entrances, 2. Building
Length, 4. Articulation & 5. Curb Cuts.
For Commercial Development, Commissioner Hoffman agrees with creating a
pedestrian friendly downtown district. He is generally okay with the standards
provided, but questions whether it the number of windows required should be
dictated and, he has concerns regarding the 40% parking. Chair Pedersen shared
that he does not like having offices on the first floor and agreed that those areas
should host retail stores or dining establishments. Commissioner Saemann
agrees with Chair Pedersen. Vice Chair Izant feels that these design standards
are fine as written. Commissioner Rice also felt that these are fine as written but
also shares Hoffman’s concerns. Commissioner Rice says to “make it transparent
on transparency.”
Chair Pedersen said he likes the direction this is going. Vice Chair Izant
concurred but requested to see some loosening of the language on page 13,
Pedestrian Amenities on Pier Avenue. He would not want to see benches on
upper pier.
VI. ADJOURNMENT TO THE AUGUST 16, 2022 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR
MEETING
Motion by Commissioner Rice and seconded by Commissioner Saemann to
adjourn the meeting. Motion carried as follows:
Aye:Chair Pedersen, Vice Chair Izant, Commissioner Saemann, Commissioner Hoffman,
and Commissioner Rice
5 -
Absent:0
The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 PM.
Page 4City of Hermosa Beach