Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-04-15 PC Minutes Regular MeetingMINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HELD ON APRIL 15, 2003, 7:00 P.M., AT THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS The meeting was called to order by Chairman Hoffinan at 7:04 P.M. Senior Planner Ken Robertson led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker, and Chairman Hoffinan Absent: None Also Present: Sol Director Blumenfeld, Community Development Director Ken Robertson, Senior Planner Denise Bothe, Recording Secretary ORAL/WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION by Commissioner Perrotti, seconded by Commissioner Pizer, to APPROVE the March 18, 2003, Minutes as submitted. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None With regard to the below -mentioned Resolutions, Chairman Hoffman pointed out that the words "City Council" should be deleted from the first two lines. MOTION by Vice -Chairman Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to APPROVE Resolution P.C. 03-17, approving a Variance to allow the required ground level open space to be located in the front yard and side yard areas with dimensions of less than 10 feet in connection with a proposed new single-family dwelling at 2326 The Strand and Resolution P.C. 03-18, approving a Variance to allow the required ground level open space to be located in the front yard and side yard areas with dimensions of less than 10 feet in connection with a proposed new single-family dwelling at 2330 The Strand. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Hoffinan, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 2003 6. CUP 00-1 -- Review of the Conditional Use Permit for Dano's Beach Grill at 1320 Hermosa Avenue (continued from the March 18, 2003 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. Director Blumenfeld commented on the Planning Commission's prior consideration of this matter at the previous meeting; and stated that the applicant submitted a floor plan, which shows an enlarged kitchen area, a modified bar area, a seating plan, a reconfiguration of the restrooms, and the removal of the existing bike rack that will allow for expansion of the patio floor area. He noted that the floor area will be increased by 88 square feet with the removal of the bike rack. Director Blumenfeld stated that the original conditional use permit (CUP) is broadly written and because of that, it will be possible to keep the existing CUP; however, he indicated that the Planning Commission should closely consider the following three conditions: Condition No. 1: The continued use of the restaurant shall be substantially consistent with submitted plans. Condition No. 8: An accurate seating plan shall be prepared by a state -licensed design professional, consistent with the occupant load sign issued for the use. Condition No. 9: Any significant changes to the interior layout which would alter the primary function of the business as a restaurant shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. Director Blumenfeld stated that if the Planning Commission determines that none of these changes are so great as to require modifying the CUP, the Planning Commission could continue with the existing CUP under the new ownership; however, given the fact that the business is expanding by 88 square feet, he indicated that the new owner would be compelled with this current plan to process a Parking Plan as part of the project approval for the Planning Commission to consider whether or not to approve one in -lieu parking space, which would require a separate public notice and hearing. He further suggested that since the floor area is being altered, that the Planning Commission might wish to consider a CUP amendment and require that a Parking Plan be processed as part of this project approval. Vice -Chairman Tucker expressed his belief that the measurements indicated in the applicant's submitted plans may not be accurate and urged the applicant to double-check the points of measurements. He noted that with the measurements he had taken, it appears an in -lieu parking space would not be necessary. Chairman Hoffman opened the public hearing. Mark Hagens, representing Southern California Restaurant Endeavors, stated that the applicant has entered into escrow for this business; noted that it is not their intent to increase the capacity of the restaurant, but to make some minor modifications to the exterior and interior of the 2 Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 2003 building; and stated that the modifications will make the appearance more aesthetically pleasing and create a larger space in the kitchen and bathroom areas. He noted that a fireplace will be placed on the north wall of the outdoor patio. Commissioner Pizer mentioned that the plans have no date or architect's name stamped on them. Responding to Commissioner Pizer's inquiry, Mr. Hagens explained that the applicant is in escrow for the liquor license; noted his expectation that escrow will close within the next 45 days; and stated that the business will be closed while the changes are being made to the building. Vice -Chairman Tucker expressed his belief that the proposed seating plan reflects that the aisles are not wide enough to meet code. Director Blumenfeld stated that where the aisles are single -loaded there is adequate clearance but that they do not have enough clearance where double loaded, and that this condition will be corrected during plan check review of the seating plan. There being no further input, Chairman Hoffman closed the public hearing. Commissioner Perrotti requested that the applicant submit to the Planning Commission the escrow instructions in order to verify that the applicant is acquiring both the restaurant and the liquor license; that the applicant also submit a seating plan — pointing out that once those materials are submitted, the Planning Commission will be in a better position, if this item is continued, to evaluate the seating plan and interior floor layout; and stated that at this point, he would recommend a continuation of this matter to the next meeting so that this review can take place. Commissioner Pizer suggested that the business name be changed on the CUP. Chairman Hoffinan re -opened the public hearing. Mr. Hagens expressed his desire that this matter move forward as quickly as possible, noting that the problems with Dano's operations have created a delay in this project moving forward; stated that he would like to maintain the CUP option to have moderate live entertainment for wedding receptions, private parties, but pointed out that it is not the applicant's intent to have bands routinely performing at this facility. Vice -Chairman Tucker reiterated his urging of the applicant to once again measure his building using the proper measuring points; and suggested that this business have a 6-month review in place following its opening. Chairman Hoffman noted his support to continue this item to allow the square footage concern to be addressed and to allow for the seating plan to be processed. MOTION by Commissioner Pizer, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to CONTINUE Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 2003 CUP 00-1 -- Review of the Conditional Use Permit for Dano's Beach Grill at 1320 Hermosa Avenue, with instructions to submit the seating plan, the escrow instructions, and proof of ownership. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Hoffinan, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer NOES: Tucker ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None 7. CUP 03-3 -- Conditional Use Permit to allow a wireless telecommunications facility to colocate with existing businesses at 1100 Pacific Coast Highway. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Director Blumenfeld explained that this project site is located at the Pacific Plaza Shopping Center; stated that the applicant chose this site as an alternative site following the Planning Commission's denial to place this facility at the Community Center; advised that the applicant proposes to install 3 antennas within a modified light pole adjacent to the north parking lot; and that the installation will also include an equipment cabinet to be located at the base of the landscaped embankment between Ralph's supermarket and the north parking lot at the shopping center. He indicated that the proposed use is consistent with the permitted uses allowed in the C-3 Zone and the General Plan. Director Blumenfeld explained that the modified light pole will replace the existing light pole; and advised that the total height of the pole will not exceed 35 feet; stated that the diameter will be changed from 9 inches to approximately 22 inches. He stated that equipment cabinets will have to be adequately screened from public view; explained that the light pole will have a 75-foot setback to the nearest public right-of-way and a 55-foot setback from the nearest residential property; that the equipment cabinet will be located 32 feet from the nearest residential property; and that because this proposal conforms to code, he noted that staff is recommending approval. Commissioner Perrotti recommended that the new light fixture be placed so that the lighting does not negatively impact the residents. Director Blumenfeld explained that since this light fixture is not going to be changed and is in the identical location, staff does not believe the light will impact the neighbors. He added that no complaints are on record with the current lighting condition at this site. Chairman Hoffinan opened the public hearing. Marty Zimmerman, representing AT&T Wireless, 12900 Park Plaza Center, Cerritos, explained that it was his directive to find a spot where the antennas could work in the downtown area and up and down Pacific Coast Highway; pointed out that this facility has been designed strictly to conform with the City's ordinance; and noted that because of the sloping ground, the height may depend on where the measurement is taken from, but pointed out that the light pole will not be any higher than it currently is. Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 2003 Commissioner Pizer commended staff and the applicant for a very thorough report package and presentation in regard to this matter. Mr. Zimmermann stated that the plan is to have everything remain the same, with the exception of a wider pole; noted that the applicant is planning to use the light fixture that is currently on the pole; and explained that a different pole will be constructed to ensure that it can adequately handle the additional weight. Vice -Chairman Tucker questioned whether this facility will connect to the regular 911 operations center. In response to Vice -Chairman Tucker's inquiry, Mr. Zimmerman stated that this site will be able to directly connect to the regular 911 operations center; that this network is designed to accommodate every application on the market; reiterated that this facility will not be pointed back towards the houses, but that it will shoot up and down Pacific Coast Highway and into the downtown area — noting that the signal will be limited by the terrain. He stated for Vice - Chairman Tucker that the current plans for this site do not include hanging any other type of device from this pole, but stated that because this field is quickly evolving, he could not give a firm answer in this regard. Sharon Blanks, 914 13th Street, stated that her home is 3 houses from this project; requested input on the safety of this facility and possible interference with satellite dishes and other home electronics; and stated that she objects to this proposal, noting that she does not feel safe and is opposed to having to view this pole from her home. Dave Naybe, 844 13th Street, stated that he can see this pole from outside his window on 13th Street; advised that a nearby power pole emits electrical noises 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; and questioned whether he will be able to hear noise coming from this equipment station. Mr. Naybe stated that the 9-inch pole is not too much of an impact on his view, but that the proposed 22-inch pole will be much too large for his view; and suggested that this pole be placed elsewhere, not in front of people's homes. He questioned whether service trucks will be coming onto the parking lot and causing an overflow of parking into the residential area. Mr. Naybe expressed his opposition to this proposal due to aesthetic reasons and issues with noise that impact the nearby residents. Roger Bacon, 1100 Pacific Coast Highway, noted that he has never experienced a problem with these types of facilities on his properties; explained that there will not be a shortage of parking because the service truck will only infrequently need one stall; and stated that because this is a self-contained unit, it will not be noisy. With respect to the inquiries of possible health effects, Mr. Zimmerman explained that this site will be broadcasting at a very low power, less than 1/200ths of the power that is allowed by the government; stated that on average, the site will be serviced once every 6 weeks; and advised that there will be no interference with electronics in the area. He indicated that the only thing that will make noise is a small air conditioning unit that will cool the cabinet box and stated that it should not present a problem for the residents. 5 Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 2003 There being no further public input, Chairman Hoffinan closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kersenboom noted that he sympathizes with the residents' concerns with visual impact, but stated that because of today's technology, sites like these are necessary. Vice -Chairman Tucker noted for the residents that these facilities are strictly and routinely monitored to comply with FCC regulations; noted the need for more cell sites and improved coverage; and stated that this pole shall be no higher than 35 feet. Commissioner Pizer expressed his belief that the applicant has taken the steps necessary to assure that the facility conforms to all regulations and that he does not believe noise and safety will be an issue. Commissioner Perrotti expressed his belief that the issues of noise, safety, location and servicing of the site have been sufficiently addressed by the applicant; and stated that he understands the neighbors' concern with this visual impact of the pole and urged the City to make sure that the new facility is no higher than what currently exists. He also highlighted the growing demand for more cell sites and improved coverage. Chairman Hoffman noted his agreement with the Commission's comments. MOTION by Vice -Chairman Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Perrotti, to APPROVE CUP 03-3 -- Conditional Use Permit to allow a wireless telecommunications facility to colocate with existing businesses at 1100 Pacific Coast Highway and moved that the proposed pole height shall be identical to the existing pole height. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None 8. CUP 03-2 -- Conditional Use Permit for a massage therapy business at 1200 Pacific Coast Highway. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Senior Planner Robertson stated that this business will be located on the first level of a 2-story commercial building; and that it will be situated next to an existing restaurant. He explained that this acupressure business is considered a massage therapy business pursuant to the definitions of the zoning code; stated that the City adopted an ordinance to allow such businesses, subject to a conditional use permit back in 1997; and noted that with this ordinance action, it adopted fairly restrictive regulations for obtaining a business license to operate as a free-standing massage therapy business. He indicated that this is the first application for a CUP under this provision, as other existing massage businesses in the City are secondary uses to health clubs, spas, beauty salons, or other medical -related uses. He noted that pursuant to the massage ordinance, if a 6 Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 2003 business has less than 25 percent of the floor area for massage, it is not required to obtain a CUP. In this case, he noted that the applicant is proposing to offer acupressure or massage therapy treatment as the primary and exclusive function of the business. Senior Planner Robertson advised that the proposed plans show 3 workrooms, a small lobby and waiting area, a wash room, and a single restroom; noted that the proposed location appears to be suitable for this type of business, as it is within a commercial center that has adequate parking and is in a fairly visible location along Pacific Coast Highway. He explained that Chapter 5.74 of the business license section of the Municipal Code governs most of the issues that involve massage therapy businesses. He indicated that some standard conditions will be placed on this business, such as operating between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M.; and advised that the applicant will have to submit more detailed floor plans, submit an application which will require review by the City Police Chief, and that the City will inspect the premises to assure compliance with respect to lighting, sanitary conditions, proper storage for towels/linens, etc. He noted that staff is recommending additional conditions, such as the need for the floor plans to be more detailed to identify private dressing rooms, separate closet storage for the soiled towels, and specifying the types of tables. Senior Planner Robertson noted for Vice -Chairman Tucker that he does not believe this business is subject to health department review because no food service is being proposed; and he mentioned that it will require City inspection for conformance to all codes. Director Blumenfeld pointed out that Municipal Health and Safety Code Section 11.55 sets out the requirements for health violations for these businesses; and explained that if the City determines that there is a health violation, then the matter can be referred to the County Health Department. Commissioner Perrotti questioned whether signs will be posted in the business instructing the employees on rules to follow. Director Blumenfeld stated that the City's ordinance makes it clear that it is incumbent upon management to instruct each employee about the requirements of the business's CUP. Director Blumenfeld stated that the building plans will have to be signed by an architect. Chairman Hoffinan opened the public hearing. Quincy Chen, applicant, stated that she has a similar licensed establishment in Redondo Beach. Ms. Chen noted for Vice -Chairman Tucker that she proposes to operate this business until 10:00 P.M. Ms. Chen confirmed for Commissioner Perrotti that she understands that she must submit a more detailed floor plan. Dave Naybe, 844 13`h Street, requested that this business close no later than 8:00 P.M. so as not to negatively impact the neighbors; and requested that the City check with Redondo Beach to Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 2003 determine if any problems have been experienced with this applicant's business. Roger Bacon, 2772 Artesia Boulevard, Suite 102, Redondo Beach, suggested that a traffic sign be erected which restricts left turns onto 13th Street from this shopping center. There being no further input, Chairman Hoffman closed the public hearing. Commissioner Perrotti stated that he is not opposed to the 10:00 P.M. closure hour for this business due to the late closure of restaurants in this area; and noted his support for a police background check of this business. Vice -Chairman Tucker noted his preference that the hours of operation be limited to 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M.; and noted his support for a police background check of this business. Chairman Hoffinan expressed his belief that this applicant has gone through this rigorous procedure because of the nature of the business; and stated that it appears this applicant has met the conditions imposed. MOTION by Commissioner Perrotti, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to APPROVE CUP 03-2 -- Conditional Use Permit for a massage therapy business at 1200 Pacific Coast Highway. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None 9. CON 03-3 -- Conditional Use Permit amendment for a two -unit condominium to reconfigure and expand two units located at 1002-1004 6th Street. Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. Senior Planner Robertson advised that the Planning Commission had previously approved this project at its August 20, 2002, meeting for a CUP on a 2-unit condominium project; stated that this project is in the plan check stage; and noted that the plans have been substantially modified, which requires that it come back before the Planning Commission. He highlighted the changes as follows: both units to reconfigure the floor plans, enlarging both the livable floor areas and the deck areas; changes in the mass and appearance of the buildings are visible from all elevations; enlarged front unit, now proposing 3 bedrooms at the basement floor level; and rear unit reconfigured to increase the total floor area by 60 square feet. Senior Planner Robertson stated that the biggest change is a proposal for a deck to cantilever out over the rear yard by 6 feet. He noted that staff reviewed all these changes and found that the project still meets all the requirements of the code. He mentioned that height compliance needs to be verified. Vice -Chairman Tucker questioned whether pushing the front unit out will interfere with the view corridor and whether enough usable storage space exists under the staircase. Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 2003 Senior Planner Robertson noted for Vice -Chairman Tucker that the applicant will have to verify that enough storage space exists. Director Blumenfeld pointed out that the space underneath the staircase extends the entire area under the staircase and appears to be adequate, but that the applicant will have to verify this condition. Chairman Hoffman opened the public hearing. Irwin Julian, project architect, 3800 Pacific Coast Highway, Torrance, offered to answer any questions the Planning Commission may have. There being no further input, Chairman Hoffman closed the public hearing. Commissioner Perrotti pointed out that staff indicated that the applicant will have to modify the garage depth to conform to code and noted his understanding that everything else conforms to the existing requirements. Commissioner Pizer commended the applicant on this project. Vice -Chairman Tucker noted his opposition with the rear building having a 6-foot balcony cantilever into the rear setback — highlighting the need for the neighbor's backyard privacy; and recommended that the balcony only cantilever 3 feet into the rear setback, thereby reducing the balcony from 18 feet to 15 feet. Chairman Hoffman expressed his belief that this is a reasonable project and noted that he would support Vice -Chairman Tucker's suggestion to reduce the area of the cantilevered balcony. MOTION by Vice -Chairman Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Perrotti, to APPROVE CON 03-3 -- Conditional Use Permit amendment for a two -unit condominium to reconfigure and expand two units located at 1002-1004 6th Street and moved that the rear balcony shall only cantilever 3 feet into the rear setback. The motion carried as follows: AYES: Hoffinan, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Chairman Hoffman recessed the meeting at 8:50 P.M. and reconvened the meeting at 9:00 P.M. HEARING(S) Commissioner Kersenboom recused himself from consideration of Agenda Item No. 10. 10. A-14 -- Appeal of Director's decision regarding the grade used for the height 9 Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 2003 measurement on a convex sloping lot at 1221 8th Street. Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. Director Blumenfeld stated that by way of minute order, staff is seeking direction from the Planning Commission as to whether this lot could be considered a convex contoured lot; and explained that code allows for staff to typically measure grade from the corner point elevations, the nearest public improvement, or another point which based upon evidence represents an altered grade — pointing out that code allows for some Planning Commission discretion, particularly with unusually shaped lots, and specifically provides for some special consideration relative to convex slopes. He stated that the applicant has provided a survey for the Planning Commission's review; noted that the survey reflects the area closest to 8th Street has a relatively steep grade to the lot for about the first 20 feet on one side of the lot and that on the other side of the lot, the grade is a little less steep. Director Blumenfeld noted that the Planning Commission had previously considered convex contours as a basis for determining whether a convex slope measurement could be used; and stated that if it is used in this case, it will enable this proposed project to go forward. He noted that the proposed project is a single-family home that will be remodeled with two stories, no greater than 25 feet high, and with no greater than a 4:12 pitch; and he mentioned that without this convex slope consideration, it would not be possible to build this project with a 25-foot high building on this lot given the datum that would have to be used. He distributed to the Planning Commission photographs depicting the cut street grade elevation at this site; and stated that all indications represent a cut condition on this property and that staff believes this to be a convex slope, but is seeking Commission confirmation. Director Blumenfeld explained that there is approximately a 5 foot difference in elevation and steep contours on one side of the lot within approximately 10 feet to the property line; stated that with the 4:12 pitch and proposed two floor levels, it would not be possible to get the 25-foot roof height on the project without depressing a significant part of the project at the street edge. Chairman Hoffman opened the public hearing. Mr. Charles Schwartz, applicant's representative, stated that the existing garage will remain at the back of the lot; and explained that this lot has steep portions to its grade. Chairman Hoffman expressed his belief that by looking at the submitted materials, it appears this is a convex lot. The Planning Commission unanimously agreed that this lot should be considered a convex slope. 11. A-14 -- Appeal of Director's decision regarding the grade used for the height measurement on a convex sloping lot at 640 Loma Drive. Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. Senior Planner Robertson stated that this item is very similar to the one just discussed; explained that in this case, the lot is fairly flat in the approximate front half of the lot and that 10 Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 2003 approximately a third of the lot slopes steeply down towards the manufacturing buildings on Cypress Avenue. The Planning Commission unanimously agreed that this lot should be considered a convex slope. 12. STAFF ITEMS a. Memorandum regarding proposed General Plan update and Local Coastal Program Director Blumenfeld indicated that before staff can invite public participation for an RFP and public input, staff would need to get City Council direction on proceeding with the proposed General Plan update; and noted that staff will present to the City Council a report on the funding availability and the nature and extent of the General Plan update and apprise the City Council of the Planning Commission's recommendation. Commissioner Pizer requested that the Planning Commission be able to review the General Plan public notice prior to it being mailed to the public. With regard to the Local Coastal Program (LCP) update, Director Blumenfeld stated that the City Council and Planning Commission had previously approved a new Local Coastal Program, which consisted of a Local Coastal Plan and a Local Implementation Plan (LIP); and noted that the City had received a grant approximately four years ago to prepare the LCP. He explained that due to differing opinions between the City and the Coastal Commission staff, the City Council at staff s recommendation directed staff to proceed with two original LCP submittal. Since it is not possible to satisfactorily resolve the following issues in dispute: water quality ordinance applied to the Coastal Zone; temporary events in the Coastal Zone; parking in the Coastal Zone; and categorical exclusions in the draft LCP and LIP. b. Memorandum regarding 2002 and 2003 State Housing Bills Senior Planner Robertson stated that the State passed two housing bills that deal with specific issues relative to housing and city zoning ordinances; noted that the no residential density loss states that cities cannot reduce, require, or permit the reduction of residential density on any parcel below the density that was approved by the Department of Housing and Community Development in determining compliance with the Housing Element Law; noted that this law prevents local governments from reducing density provisions in its General Plan in certain parts of the city; and that the City Attorney is advising at this time not to entertain or implement any down -zoning on the City's part. Senior Planner Robertson noted that the other law passed by the State relates to second units and density bonus laws; and stated that it requires that local governments shall approve second unit requests ministerially without discretionary review. He noted that the City currently allows in- law quarters for age -restricted second units on lots greater than 8,000 square feet with a CUP; and that with this new law, it would have to be approved administratively. He noted that staff will be consulting with the City Attorney on this matter. 1 t Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 2003 Senior Planner Robertson advised that the proposed Housing Element Reform bill died, but noted that the same issues have been raised once again with Senator Dunn's proposed new bill, SB744. Director Blumenfeld stated that staff will obtain an interpretation from the City Attorney's office in regard to these bills. 13. A-14 — Appeal of Director's decision regarding review of fagade changes and minor alterations in connection with conditions of approval at 22 Pier Avenue. taff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. Director Blumenfeld stated that the applicant is proposing to make some changes to the fagade and interior of the building; stated that any changes including signage or interior alterations are required by the existing CUP to come before the Planning Commission for consideration; and asked for direction from the Planning Commission as to whether the proposed changes are considered minor in nature. He noted that the applicant is proposing to reconfigure some of the kitchen and seating areas, upgrade and clean the facility prior to opening for business and changing the name and operation of the building; stated that an Asian design will be placed on the exterior of the building; and advised that the existing double French doors were supposed to have been double glazed and screened. Commissioner Kersenboom expressed his belief that the proposed changes are minor. Vice -Chairman Tucker questioned if the seating arrangement will be altered and whether a seating plan should be required. Director Blumenfeld indicated that the Planning Commission could require a seating plan as part of the submittal. Mark Cosgrove, applicant, explained that the existing booths are raised and that he is proposing to enlarge the booth area. Vice -Chairman Tucker expressed his belief that the proposed changes are major. Commissioner Pizer requested a seating plan and expressed his belief that the proposed changes are major. Commissioner Perrotti expressed his belief that this is a major change; he noted his support for obtaining a seating plan; and noted his interest in holding a public hearing to hear how this new business will be operated. Chairman Hoffman pointed out that because the existing conditions do not conform to the CUP, he would consider these proposed changes major. Mr. Cosgrove noted his concern with delaying the opening of this business. 12 Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 2003 Staff explained that this matter may be able to be expedited. 14. Commissioner Items The Planning Commission congratulated Ken Robertson on his promotion to Senior Planner. Vice -Chairman Tucker noted his desire that new owners of businesses in the Downtown area be apprised/reminded of the CUP requirements; and noted his support for 6-month reviews to follow up on conformity. 15. Adjournment At 10:05 P.M. the meeting was formally adjourned. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of May 20, 2 3. -�- Peter 1-loffnian, C lrman So Director lunge hfeld, Secretary 10.160 11t": 13 Planning Commission Minutes April 15, 2003