HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution 03-142
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2s
29
P.C. RESOLUTION 03-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS AMENDED
TO RECONFIGURE THE FLOOR PLAN, TO ALLOW OUTDOOR
SEATING IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT
WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT,
AT 1332 HERMOSA AVENUE, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS
10, 11 & 12, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH
TRACT
Section 1. An application was filed by Dustin Gregg seeking an amendment to a
Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor seating in conjunction with an existing restaurant with on -
sale general alcohol and live entertainment.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider
the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit on March 18, 2003, at which testimony and
evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission
Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission
makes the following factual findings:
1. The original C.U.P. granted in 1983, permitted on -sale beer and wine in conjunction
with a restaurant. At the February 13, 1996 meeting, the City Council approved a C.U.P.
amendment to allow on -sale general alcohol and live entertainment in conjunction with the
existing restaurant. The proposed amendment does not alter the existing and approved primary use
as a restaurant with on -sale general alcohol and live entertainment.
2. The site is located in the downtown district, which has several similar restaurants with
on -sale general alcohol;
3. The site is zoned C-2 allowing the existing on -sale alcohol use with a Conditional Use
Permit.
Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the
following findings pertaining to the application to amend the Conditional Use Permit:
1. The site is zoned C-2, and the continued operation of the restaurant with the proposed
modifications is suitable for the proposed location.
2. The imposition of conditions as required by this resolution to address noise and
nuisance concerns will mitigate any negative impacts on, and will improve its compatibility with,
nearby residential or commercial properties within the downtown district;
3. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15323, Class 23 of the California
Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Normal operations of existing facilities for public
gatherings for which the facilities were designed, where there is a past history of the facility being
used for the same kind of purpose.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2s
29
Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the
requested amendments to the Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan, subject to the
following Conditions of Approval, which supersede the conditions contained in C.C. Resolution
96-5789:
1. Interior and exterior building alterations and the continued use and operation of the
restaurant shall be substantially consistent with the plans submitted and reviewed by the
Planning Commission on March 18, 2003.
A. The outdoor railing shall be redesigned to create a cue along the south side of
the building.
2. The hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00 A.M. and 2:00 A.M. daily. Outdc
dining, seating and any use of the outdoor patio area shall not be allowed later than 11:
PM. No patrons shall be seated on the patios beginning an hour before these times.
3. The hours for live entertainment shall be limited to the hours between 4:00 PM to 1:15
Monday through Friday, and from 9:00 AM to 1:15 AM on Saturdays and Sunda;
Federal and State holidays, Cinco De Mayo and St. Patrick's day.
4. Live entertainment shall be limited to the interior dining room only.
5. A code complying seating plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior
issuance of building permits.
6. An acoustical study shall be prepared by an acoustical engineer, including proposed sou.
dampening features to baffle and direct sound away from the entrance/exit and wind"
areas to ensure compliance with the noise ordinance. Said study and sound dampeni
features shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior
the issuance of building permits and shall be implemented in the building.
A. The acoustical study shall be based on the worst -case scenario, or on a sou
level that will not be exceeded at any given time.
B. Management shall be responsible for the music/entertainment volume levels.
C. During the performance of any live entertainment, the exterior doors a
windows shall remain closed.
D. The air conditioning system shall be of an adequate capacity to air condition i
entire restaurant.
7. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial
establishments nearby.
8. The business shall provide adequate staffing, management and supervisory techniques to
prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business
and in nearby public areas.
9. The Police Chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists, and may authorize
the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel to eliminate the
problem, and then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission, which will
automatically initiate a review of this conditional use permit by the Commission.
10. The exterior of all the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and
maintained free of graffiti at all times.
.2.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
11. Any changes to the interior or exterior layout which would alter the primary function of
the business as a restaurant shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning
Commission.
12. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of
the Municipal Code.
13. No live entertainment shall be permitted in the outside seating area, and the volume level
of any amplified music in the outside seating area shall be controlled by management to
ensure compliance with the noise ordinance.
14. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the city's
noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential neighborhoods,
and/or commercial establishments. Noise emanating from the property shall be
monitored to verify compliance with the noise ordinance in response to any complaints.
15. The Planning Commission shall review the operation of the restaurant and the parking
facility for compliance with conditions of approval and compliance with the Noise
Ordinance 6 months from the opening of the new outdoor seating area, and in response to
any complaints thereafter.
Section 6. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the
owners of the property involved have filed a the office of the Planning Division of the Community
Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the
conditions of this grant. The grant for live entertainment shall not be in effect until the acoustical
study is complete and approved by the Community Development Director, and all sound proofing
measures are implemented in the building pursuant to Condition Nos. 12, 14, and 16.
The Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan Amendment shall be recorded,
and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department.
Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval
is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable.
Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and
employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee
to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable
time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any
claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to
promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully
in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless
the City.
The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may
be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant.
Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion,
participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the
permittee of any obligation under this condition.
-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the
conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any
development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development
or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions.
The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the
subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects
on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use.
Section 7. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the
decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made witlil
90 days after the final decision by the City Council.
VOTE: AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 03-14 is a true and complete record of the action taken
by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of
March 18, 2003.
...........
Ron Pizer, Cba" •man Sol Blulme :elf, Secretary
March 18 2003
Date
CUPR1332 (03-1)
.4.