Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution 03-31RESOLUTION NO.03-31 1 2 3 4 s 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2s 26 27 2s 29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A GREATER THAN 50% EXPANSION AND REMODEL TO AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING WHILE MAINTAINING NONCONFORMING SIDE YARDS, GUEST PARKING AND GARAGE SETBACK AT 845 14TH STREET The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by John G. Lipscombe, owner of real property located at 845 14th Street, requesting a greater than 50% expansion and remodel to an existing nonconforming single family dwelling, pursuant to Chapter 17.52 of the Zoning Ordinance Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a hearing to consider the application on May 20, 2003, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, were presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. Based on the evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The applicant is proposing a 1,041 square foot expansion to a single-family dwelling, a 51-year old structure, resulting in an increase of valuation of 98.7% while maintaining nonconforming side yards, guest parking and garage setback. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: 1. The existing nonconforming side yards, guest parking and garage setback are not significant or unusual in regards to compatibility with neighboring properties; 2. The scale of the proposed expansion is reasonable, and is consistent with planning and zoning requirements for the R-1 zone and does not warrant requiring the current nonconforming conditions to be brought into conformance; 3. Approval of the expansion is consistent with the intent and goals of Chapter 17.52 of the Zoning Ordinance; 4. The project is Categorically Exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to CEQA guidelines, Section 15301 e(2) with the finding that the project is in an area with available services and not in an environmentally sensitive area. Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves a greater than 50% expansion, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The project shall be consistent with submitted plans. Minor modifications to the plan which do not involve any further expansion shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2. Plans shall show the interior dimensions of the garage. If the garage does not meet the minimum dimensions required for two parking spaces pursuant to Section, 17.44.140 of the Zoning Ordinance, then the garage shall be enlarged to satisfy the minimum size requirement. 3. A termite and structural inspection report verifying the structural integrity of the building must be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 4. Upon issuance of building permits the project shall proceed in compliance with the scope of work outlined on the plans and any further demolition or construction contrary to said plans will result in project delays in order for the City to review project modifications, and may require new plan submittals and Planning Commission review to proceed with construction work. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits for demolition and construction, the contractor shall verify the structural integrity of the proposed walls to be retained with a structural inspection approved by the Community Development Director, with details incorporated on construction drawings. This may require further additional structural pest inspections and/or an inspection by a structural engineer. Section 6. Pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedures Section 1094.6, any legal challenge to the decision of the Planning Commission, after a formal appeal to the City Council, must be made within 90 days after the final decision by the City Council. AYES: Hoffinan, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Kersenboom CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 03-31 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their t' regular meeting of May 20, 2003. Peter Hoffman, May 20 2003 Date Nrr845 `A