Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution 03-4810 11 12 13 14 is 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2s 26 27 28 29 P.C.RESOLUTION NO.03-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH NONCONFORMING FRONT YARD, SIDE YARD AND GARAGE SETBACKS RESULTING IN A GREATER THAN 50% INCREASE IN VALUATION AT 456 31ST STREET The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Chris and Karen Kohles, owners of real property located at 456 31st Street, requesting an addition to an existing nonconforming single-family residence resulting in a greater than 50% increase in valuation, pursuant to Chapter 17.52 of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a hearing to consider the application on August 19, 2003, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, were presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. Based on the evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The applicant is proposing a 758 square foot expansion to livable floor area and a 432 square foot expansion to deck area of an existing 57-year-old single-family dwelling, resulting in an increase of valuation of 95.9% while maintaining a nonconforming front yard setback. 2. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing nonconforming garage and construct a new attached garage in order to remove the existing nonconforming side yard and garage setbacks. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: 1. The existing nonconformities are not severe or unusual. 2. The scale of the proposed expansion is reasonable, and is consistent with planning and zoning requirements for the R-1 zone and does not warrant requiring the current nonconforming front yard be"brought into conformance; 3. Approval of the expansion is consistent with the intent and goals of Chapter 17.52 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The project is Categorically Exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to CEQA guidelines, Section 15301 e(2) with the finding that the project is in an area with available services and not in an environmentally sensitive area. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 is 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves an extension of a nonconforming side yard, subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The project shall be consistent with submitted plans. Modifications to the plan not involving any further expansion shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission. 2. The survey shall be revised to properly label the property corner points. 3. A termite and structural inspection report verifying the structural integrity of the building must be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 4. Upon issuance of building permits the project shall proceed in compliance with the scope of work outlined on the plans and any further demolition or construction contrary to said plans will result in project delays in order for the City to review project modifications, and may require new plan submittals and Planning Commission review to proceed with construction work. VOTE: AYES: Hoffman, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 03-48 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of August 19, 2003. Peter Hoffman, August 19, 2003 Date NRR456 (03-8)