Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution 03-4910 11 12 13 14 is 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2s 26 27 2e 29 P.C.RESOLUTION NO.03-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH NONCONFORMING HEIGHT, GUEST PARKING, AND FRONT YARD, SIDE YARD, AND GARAGE SETBACKS, WHICH EXTENDS AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING SIDE YARD AT 827 SUNSET DRIVE The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Mark and Ashley Osterkamp, owners of real property located at 827 Sunset Drive, requesting an addition to an existing nonconforming single- family residence, which extends an existing nonconforming side yard, pursuant to Chapter 17.52 of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a hearing to consider the application on August 19, 2003, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, were presented to and considered by the Planning Commission. Section 3. Based on the evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The applicant is proposing a 278 square foot livable floor area expansion on the first floor of an existing 35-year-old single-family dwelling with nonconforming height, guest parking, and front yard, side yard, and garage setbacks, resulting in an increase of valuation of 30.8% while extending a less than required side yard setback. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: 1. The existing nonconformities are not severe or unusual. 2. The scale of the proposed expansion is reasonable, and is consistent with planning and zoning requirements for the R-3 zone and does not warrant requiring the current nonconforming side yard be brought into conformance; 3. Approval of the expansion is consistent with the intent and goals of Chapter 17.52 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The project is Categorically Exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to CEQA guidelines, Section 15301 e(2) with the finding that the project is in an area with available services and not in an environmentally sensitive area. Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves an extension of a nonconforming side yard, subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1. The project shall be consistent with submitted plans. Modifications to the plan not involving any further expansion shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission. a) The door shall be removed between the proposed added floor area and the stairway access to the floor above. 2. A termite and structural inspection report verifying the structural integrity of the building must be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 3. Upon issuance of building permits the project shall proceed in compliance with the scope of work outlined on the plans and any further demolition or construction contrary to said plans will result in project delays in order for the City to review project modifications, and may require new plan submittals and Planning Commission review to proceed with construction work. VOTE: AYES: Hoffinan, Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 03-49 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of August 19, 2003. ' a 3 a 42S Peter Hoffinan, C �� art August 19 2003 Date NRR827 (03-10) Sol Blumenf Id, Secretary 2