HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-05-21 PC Minutes Regular MeetingMINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH HELD ON MAY 21, 2002, AT 7:00 P.M. AT THE
HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER, ROOM 4
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perrotti at 7:06 P.M.
Vice -Chair Pizer led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners *Hoffman (*arrived at 9:25 P.M.), Kersenboom,
Vice -Chair Pizer, Tucker and Chairman Perrotti
Absent: None
Also Present: Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development Director
Michael Schubach, City Planner
Bob Goldin, Contract Planner
Denise Bothe, Recording Secretary
MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to APPROVE
the April 16, 2002, Minutes as submitted. Hearing no objection, Chairman Perrotti so ordered.
MOTION by Vice -Chair Pizer, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to APPROVE
Resolution Nos. P.C. 02-17, 02-18, 02-19, 02-20, 02-21. Hearing no objection, Chairman
Perrotti so ordered.
None.
6. ORAL WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
7. PDP 01-10 -- An Amendment to the Approved Planned Development
Permit/Precise Development Plan (PLOP) No. 01-10 and an Addendum to the
Certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to allow Tyco Telecommunications to
utilize a Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) method of installation for the
segment of the submarine fiber optic cable project located between Hermosa
Avenue and the Strand, along Second Street, then under the beach and out to
approximately O,000 feet beyond the shoreline, in lieu of the Direct Burial method
approved by the City Council in December of 2001, to install the two fiber optic
cables along this same alignment. An Addendum to the certified Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to assess any potential
environmental impacts and incorporate or revise applicable mitigation measures
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 2002, Page 1 of 11
associated with the Horizontal Directional Drilling option. All other aspects of the
project are unchanged and are in accordance with the previously approved PDP
and EIR.
Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval to the City Council and approve the said
request.
Director Blumenfeld provided a brief history of the previous approval for this project by the
Planning Commission and the City Council; and explained that the applicant is now proposing
to amend the existing PDP to allow Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) operations instead of
a direct landing on Second Street and immediately offshore. Director Blumenfeld noted that
the extent of this change is to allow the applicant flexibility to either use this HDD process or
Direct Burial if the conditions warrant and if acceptable by the Coastal Commission; and stated
that the City has hired Contract Planner Bob Goldin as the project manager.
Planner Goldin explained that due to issues raised by the California Coastal Commission
following the City's approval, Tyco is now requesting to amend its PDP approval to allow for
use of this HDD approach, which is to install a portion of this system on Second Street
between Beach Drive and Hermosa Avenue and then outwards to the ocean of approximately
3,000 feet — pointing out that this HDD approach is preferred by the California Coastal
Commission; added that this amended approach is more consistent with the City's concerns to
achieve maximum burial of the cable both on the shoreline and the beach; and advised that no
private property will be affected by the HDD and bore alignment. Planner Goldin explained
that the HDD approach will utilize a drilling rig to create 2 bore holes, which will start at Second
Street, to accommodate the 2 fiber optic cables coming in as part of the Transpacific ring, then
going down the public right-of-way on Second Street, continuing down under the Strand wall
alongside the restrooms, and then out approximately 3,000 feet to the ocean. He explained
that the maximum depth that is expected to be achieved is approximately 100 feet below the
shoreline, thus eliminating the potential for cable exposure.
Since the staging area has been relocated from the beach to Second Street, Planner Goldin
explained that the largest impact using the HDD approach will be noise; that in order to help
offset the noise created by this approach, a sound wall around the staging area will be put in
place and that sound attenuation devices will be on the equipment as well as limitations on the
operation of the drilling approach; and pointed out that the final design and devices to reduce
the noise will be subject to review and approval by the City. He added that the applicant has
hired an acoustical engineer who will develop the specifications for the devices and the sound
wall around the staging area to ensure that the intent of the conditions is met. Planner Goldin
stated that the HDD approach is expected to take approximately 7 weeks to complete, 2 to 3
weeks of which will be the actual drilling, based on an 8:00 A.M. to sunset, Monday through
Friday work schedule. Based upon the City's review of the information submitted, he stated
that the applicant believes the HDD approach is not expected to result in any new significant
impacts nor substantially increase any previous impacts beyond those already identified in the
certified EIR -- noting that all factors with HDD are short-term construction related; and stated
that following construction, it will result in addressing the City's long-term concerns with the
Direct Burial approach in achieving maximum burial.
Planner Goldin confirmed that staff did send notices out to the residents and business owners
within 1,000 feet of the staging area, posted the project notice at 6 locations, and placed an 8-
page legal ad in the newspaper; in addition, he stated that Tyco has made attempts to meet
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 2002, Page 2 of 11
with the residents and business owners in the area; and that to date, the City has received no
written correspondence neither in support or in opposition to this project. He added that this
item is scheduled for City Council review on June 11, 2002; and that with the City Council's
approval, the applicant anticipates beginning construction this Fall and completion by the end
of the year.
In response to Commissioner Tucker's inquiry, Planner Goldin explained that the grounding
beds will be below the beach itself; that it will take approximately 2 days to complete these
beds; that the location of the grounding beds is closer to the Strand and further back from the
shoreline; and that the impact will be very minimal and short-term.
Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing.
Jim Kelly, Tyco Communications, explained that this previously approved project will remain
the same, that this change is a change to the construction method only; and stated for
Commissioner Tucker that the grounding bed activities are typically a 1-day operation and that
the impact is minimal.
In response to Vice -Chair Pizer's questions, Mr. Kelly explained that exploratory geotechnical
testing was done to a depth of 180 feet; advised that the core will be at a depth of 100 feet;
and that the test results indicate that no problems are anticipated. Mr. Kelly added that if any
problems are experienced, that the type of problems with this type of operation won't involve
anything that would last any considerable duration of time; and mentioned that spare
equipment will be nearby. Mr. Kelly suggested two timelines for completion of this project: a
5-day work schedule, from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., and if permitted, the preferable work
schedule would be a 6-day workweek with longer hours. Mr. Kelly commented on the drilling
enclosure, which is proposed to be covered with murals; stated that the temporary walls will
double as sound attenuation devices; advised that some streetscaping will be provided for
aesthetic purposes; mentioned that only two pieces of equipment will appear above the 12-foot
high wall -- the drilling mast and a periodic boom crane; and stated that the constant
reciprocating noise will not be any louder than that noise of a well -tuned City bus.
Responding to Commissioner Tucker's inquiry, Mr. Kelly stated that there predominantly will be
5 pieces of equipment: support air compressor with a driven engine; an electrical generator
with a driven engine; the drilling rig itself with a driven engine; and then the mud
makeup/recovery system, which has a driven engine -- pointing out that each engine will have
an enclosure around it with its interior walls covered with thick sound attenuating mats.
Addressing Commissioner Kersenboom's inquiry, Mr. Kelly stated that if everything goes as
planned, he expects the drilling activities to start around September 13, 2002; stated that no
engines will be turned on until 8:00 A.M.; that the workers will be on site at 7:00 A.M. getting
the small tools ready, but not making any loud noises; commented on a proposed mural
painting contest; stated that all the workers will be transported to this site to alleviate any
parking problems; and noted his preference to work 11-hour days, 6 days a week — pointing
out that it takes approximately one hour to clean up the site and tools and to secure the site
before leaving for the day.
Dennis Sours, property owner at Second Street and the Strand, stated that he is the residential
property owner most affected by this project; urged the applicant to be considerate of the
residents; and noted his preference for more working days with quieter evenings at his home.
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 2002, Page 3 of 11
In response to the resident's comments, Mr. Kelly stated that the applicant has and will
continue to solicit input from the residents and business owners nearby; and advised that the
residents were invited to attend an informal meeting the previous night to discuss any related
issues/concerns. Mr. Kelly stated advised that the sidewalks will remain open; that this project
will not impact access nor parking for the businesses; that the business most affected by this
project is the cafe; and advised that the applicant has worked out an amicable business deal
with the cafe to supply food to some of the crews, which will turn out to be an increase in
business for this business owner. He stated that the applicant will continue to be receptive to
the input/concerns of the residents/businesses; and mentioned that, if necessary, battery -
operated lights can be used for cleanup between 7:00 P.M. and 8:00 P.M.
Vice -Chair Pizer requested that the Planning Commission be provided copies of any
notification correspondence between the residents or business owners or minutes of meetings,
if available, which the applicant has had with these residents and business owners.
There being no further input, Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Tucker addressed his concern with the hours of operation and noise level which
may negatively impact the nearby residents; suggested that rubberized pads be placed on the
ground to alleviate noise from anything being dropped on the ground; and suggested that
information concerning the meetings with the residents/businesses be provided to City Council.
Mr. Goldin stated for Commissioner Tucker that if necessary, outside inspectors will be
obtained and that Tyco will be responsible for those fees; that the City will be reimbursed for
any loss of parking revenues; that phone numbers will be posted on site for those wishing to
contact someone in regard to this project; and stated that if these operations exceed the
approved sound levels during the sound monitoring activities/program, the applicant will be
required to add additional mitigation measures and/or take additional steps to alleviate the
exceeded sound levels.
Director Blumenfeld added that a condition exists that the final design of the noise attenuation,
wall height and design would be established based on the acoustical engineer's study and
recommendations.
Commissioner Kersenboom addressed his preference for a shorter construction period, but
that if it is too noisy for the residents, that the activities be scaled back to the satisfaction of
everyone involved.
Addressing the Planning Commission's statements with regard to hours of operation, Planner
Goldin suggested that the conditions be modified on Page 10, Section Nos. 6, 7, 8 of the
supplemental to allow for a 7:00 A.M. startup, with no equipment being turned on until 8:00
A.M., that work continue up until 7:00 P.M., and that cleanup and securing the site be done by
8:00 P.M., or as otherwise restricted by the City based on complaints of the residents.
In response to Vice -Chair Pizer's concern with any possible complaints received by the
residents or businesses, Director Blumenfeld suggested that wording would be added that the
City will monitor the situation for noise during the construction activities; that if a substantial
number of complaints are received, this matter will be relayed to the Director of Public Works
and Community Development to make an evaluation/investigation of the complaints; and noted
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 2002, Page 4 of 11
that staff will be able to react in a timely manner to noise complaints. He noted that signs for
contact information will be posted on site for those who want to voice any concern any
day/time of the week.
Following further discussion, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission to allow the
project activities from 7:00 A.M. for prepping the tools/site„ start of the machinery at 8:00 A.M.
until 7:00 P.M., and cleanup operations from 7:00 P.M. until 8:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Mr. Kelly noted for Commissioner Tucker that on a regular basis, there will be two 20-foot low -
side dumpsters servicing this project, with two truck drop-offs of these dumpsters every day;
that there will be one daily fuel delivery; that two loads of pipe will be necessary to complete
the project; and added that there will be flaggers to direct the traffic during these deliveries.
He added that the offsite dumpsters will not negatively impact traffic on Beach Drive.
Director Blumenfeld pointed out that as part of the mitigation program, staff will make sure that
signage will clearly delineate whom to contact during any hours/days of the week.
As part of the mitigation plan, Planner Goldin explained that the mitigation program will be
comprehensive, looking at deliveries, drop-offs, traffic„ parking, and that these issues will be
addressed up front to ensure safety and ease of accessibility.
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the hours of operation be incorporated
into the resolution; and that the ability be included to amend, if necessary, those hours of
operation.
MOTION by Vice -Chair Pizer, seconded by Chairman Perrotti, to CONCUR with staff's
recommendation; moved that the hours will be 7:00 A.M. for prepping the tools/site, start of the
machinery at 8:00 A.M. until 7:00 P.M., cleanup operations from 7:00 P.M. until 8:00 P.M.,
Monday through Friday; and that the hours are subject to change pending substantial concern
from the public.
AYES: Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker
NOES: None
ABSENT: Hoffman (had not yet arrived)
ABSTAIN: None
Chairman Perrotti recessed the meeting at 8:32 P.M. and reconvened the meeting at 8:39 P.M.
8. CUP 02-5 — Conditional Use Permit amendment to locate wireless communication
antennae on an existing office building at 200 Pier Avenue, Nextel.
Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request.
Director Blumenfeld explained that the applicant is proposing to install four antennas on an
existing office building, mounted on the north and south face of the building; that the antennas
will exceed the height of the building by approximately 2 feet; that these additional antennas
will service the western portion of the City; that an existing telecommunications facility already
exists on site; and noted that staff believes the antennas can successfully be lowered by 7
inches in order to comply with the requirements of the City's zoning code. He suggested that
the antennas be painted to match the color of the building rather than require an enclosure.
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 2002, Page 5 of 11
Director Blumenfeld noted for Vice -Chair Pizer that the applicant has stated that lowering these
antennas would be acceptable.
Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing.
Ed Gallo, representing Nextel Communications, explained the need to fill a gap in coverage in
the western portion of this City — noting that this is a coverage issue rather than a capacity
issue; stated that this antenna facility is smaller than what Nextel typically builds; and
explained that lowering the antennas 7 inches will have a very slight impact upon the coverage
and confirmed that it would be acceptable to the applicant.
Commissioner Tucker addressed his concerns with the FCC guidelines he obtained from the
internet; and stated that from what he has read in this literature, this matter needs further
study/investigation.
Addressing Commissioner Tucker's concern, Director Blumenfeld advised that there already
exists two antennas on this site which are operating in conformance with FCC
guidelines/regulations; and explained that an engineer must certify that the project complies
with FCC requirements, which has already been done.
Mr. Gallo pointed out that the applicant had provided an RF certification form prior to this going
up for the FCC license; explained that the applicant is required to supply this form giving the
anticipated power of this facility; that this form does take into consideration the existing
antennas on site; that in terms of the antenna height, the amount of energy coming from these
sites is so low that there is no environmental impact; and added that the maximum watts
allowed is typically 200 watts of power per antenna — pointing out that this one is a much
smaller facility and is substantially less.
Commissioner Tucker noted his concern with the distance of the antennas with the residents to
the south of this facility and expressed his belief that this addition will intensify the use and that
more information should be obtained before the Planning Commission approves this request.
Based on the information he obtained from the internet, he is concerned with exposure limits to
the residents and noted that the RF form/report had not been provided to the Planning
Commission.
Director Blumenfeld noted the City's desire to encourage applicants to co -locate these
antennas when possible, and explained that the City is pre-empted from including health
concerns in the placement of an antenna — pointing out that the Federal government has
already deemed these antennas to be compliant with all health and safety issues.
Mr. Gallo reiterated that the RF certification form was submitted with this application and
advised that the information in the form demonstrates that, in fact, this facility as proposed to
be operated will comply with FCC regulations; and added that as part of the applicant's FCC
license, they are required to annually test the broadcast signal to ensure compliance. He
added that this is a much smaller facility than what is typically built; and that these are very
low -powered facilities which operate with radio waves, not microwaves.
Director Blumenfeld advised that a copy of the RF report/form will be provided to the Planning
Commission.
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 2002, Page 6 of 11
There being no further input, Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Kersenboom, seconded by Vice -Chair Pizer, to CONCUR with
staff's recommendation. Motion carried as reflected by the following vote:
AYES: Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer
NOES: Tucker
ABSENT: Hoffman (had not yet arrived)
ABSTAIN: None
9. CUP 02-6 -- Conditional Use Permit to allow additional rooftop telecommunication
equipment to an existing building nonconforming to height requirements at 2601
Pacific Coast Highway, Cingular Wireless.
Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request.
Director Blumenfeld advised that this is an application for co -location; explained that what is
being proposed is a VTS cabinet, which is part of the transmission process; stated that the
equipment is proposed to be located entirely below the existing parapet of this nonconforming
building; and noted staff's belief that this conforms with the City's code.
Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing.
Director Blumenfeld noted for Commissioner Tucker that the roof will be able to handle the
additional equipment.
Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing.
Lemuel Hawkins, representing Cingular Wireless, advised that Cingular Wireless is adding
these additional cabinets to all of its sites in the Southern California region in order to handle
additional call capability; explained that this site currently has two equipment cabinets which
can handle 200 calls; and that by adding two additional cabinets, the call capability will be
doubled to 400 calls per minute. Mr. Hawkins pointed out that no additional antennas will be
added; and advised that a structural engineer has cleared this site for the additional weight of
the cabinets. He reiterated that this proposal is to increase capability; and mentioned that the
FCC allows 1,000 megawatts of power and that these sites are at minus one megawatt.
There being no further input, Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Kersenboom, seconded by Vice -Chair Pizer, to CONCUR with
staff's recommendation. Motion carried as reflected by the following vote:
AYES: Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker
NOES: None
ABSENT: Hoffman (had not yet arrived)
ABSTAIN: None
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 2002, Page 7 of 11
MAM
10. NR 02-5 -- Addition and remodel of an existing nonconforming single family
residence resulting in a greater than 50% increase in valuation at 2716 Hermosa
Avenue.
Staff Recommended Action: To continue to June 18, 2002 meeting.
City Planner Schubach briefly noted staff's recommendation for a continuance of this matter
due to additional time needed to address compliance issues.
MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Vice -Chair Pizer, to CONCUR with staff's
recommendation. Motion carried as reflected by the following vote:
AYES: Kersenboom, Perrotti, Pizer, Tucker
NOES: None
ABSENT: Hoffman (had not yet arrived)
ABSTAIN: None
Due to a possible conflict of interest, Chairman Perrotti excused himself from consideration of
the following matter.
11. NR 02-6 -- Addition and remodel to an existing nonconforming single-family
dwelling resulting in a greater than 50% increase in valuation at 1557 Golden
Avenue.
Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request.
City Planner Schubach stated that this project will increase valuation by 99.7 percent; advised
that this dwelling was constructed in 1953; that it currently has a nonconforming front yard,
side yard and one -car garage and a nonconforming garage setback, but pointed out that the
applicant is proposing to add a garage with a 17-foot setback — noting that this parking will be
in conformance with the City's code. City Planner Schubach addressed staff's main concern
with the existing den/guest room on the ground floor which has an interior access spiral
staircase which doesn't meet the Uniform Building Code as far as access; and that it is staff's
recommendation that the interior stairs become compliant with the UBC. He added that
because this lower -level room has a laundry facility and a wet bar, staff is concerned about it
ultimately being converted to a second unit; and, therefore, staff would recommend a condition
to impose a deed restriction regarding notifying any future owners that this dwelling is only to
be a used as a one -unit development on this property.
Vice -Chair Pizer opened the public hearing.
Sonia Rodriguez, project designer, stated that the applicant's living quarters will be limited in
size if they are to comply with the UBC for the interior staircase; that they would prefer a
regular staircase if permitted to go over 100 percent of the existing square footage of the
existing house; advised that the owners do not intend to rent out the lower portion of the house
and that they are amenable to a deed restriction; and she urged the Planning Commission to
allow additional footage to allow for a regular staircase.
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 2002, Page 8 of 11
There being no further input, Vice -Chair Pizer closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Tucker addressed his preference that the lower level laundry room be
eliminated; that the wet bar be limited in size to that permitted in a condominium unit; and that
the stairway shall comply with code.
Director Blumenfeld mentioned that the City wouldn't consider a code compliant staircase as
contributing to the valuation percentage.
Commissioner Kersenboom noted his concurrence with eliminating the lower level laundry
room and limiting the size of the wet bar.
MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to CONCUR with
staff's recommendation; moved that the wet bar be limited in size to that of condominium
specifications; that only one laundry facility be permitted on site; that if this is determined to be
3 stories, that it comply with the UBC standards for 3 stories or more; that a deed restriction be
put in place; and that the internal staircase comply with the UBC.
AYES:
Kersenboom, Pizer, Tucker
NOES:
None
ABSENT:
Hoffman (had not yet arrived)
ABSTAIN:
Perrotti
12. STAFF ITEMS
a. Memorandum regarding mezzanine addition/change of use within manufacturing
building at 717 Valley Drive.
Director Blumenfeld explained that staff is looking for direction from the Planning Commission
with respect to a change of use of an older manufacturing building located in the City's
manufacturing zone; that there is common parking shared between two properties; and noted
that the tenant in one of the spaces has partially completed a mezzanine space and is seeking
approval after the fact to occupy the space — pointing out that this tenant space has 1,500
square feet, with an added 405 square feet of mezzanine space. Director Blumenfeld
explained that the manufacturing permitted use list contains a few uses which aren't
traditionally manufacturing, e.g., architectural studios and artist studios which are allowed in
the M Zone; and added that these parking requirements aren't necessarily consistent with
other manufacturing type uses, which creates a problem. He stated that the zoning ordinance
doesn't typically allow for parking consideration among various uses within a building, but that
it does allow for consideration for a mixture of uses on site with a parking plan. Since this artist
studio is already a permitted use in the M Zone, he stated that staff is looking for policy
direction on whether the zoning ordinance should be amended to allow for this mix of uses
within a building since the City already allows these uses in the zone.
Director Blumenfeld explained that with this 1,500-square-foot pre-existing manufacturing use,
the parking requirement for manufacturing is 1 parking space per 300 square feet, which
equates to 5 required spaces for this tenant. He added that the proposed use is 1,905 square
feet with the completion of the mezzanine; that if the Planning Commission considers the artist
space as a retail use, it would require 8 parking spaces, which would require an additional 3
parking spaces on site — pointing out that this is not possible because the current parking is
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 2002, Page 9 of 11
already under -supplied for this older industrial building. Director Blumenfeld explained that the
majority of the time this use will not operate in any kind of a retail manner; that it will simply be
used as a studio, so it's not unreasonable to consider it at a much lower parking ratio since
there won't be customers coming in and out of this business. He stated that if the Planning
Commission wants to consider an alternate parking setup, this body could consider the artist's
use, the existing light -manufacturing use at 1,500 square feet still at 1 per 300 square feet,
resulting in 5 required parking spaces and then combine the commercial with the warehouse
use, which is parked at a much lower parking ratio of 1 per 1,000 square feet.
Commissioner Kersenboom expressed his preference that instead of developing a new code
for this one instance, that this type of situation be dealt with on a case -by -case basis.
Director Blumenfeld advised that there is a requirement in the zoning ordinance that requires
the tenant to file a covenant indicating that the use will be warehouse, thereby prohibiting the
current use from transforming into a more intense use; and added that a covenant makes code
enforcement efforts much easier.
Commissioner Hoffman addressed his concern with setting a precedent.
Director Blumenfeld pointed out that staff's only concern is that there is an inherent
contradiction in the City's zoning ordinance because the City has recently amended the
permitted use list for manufacturing and allowed architect and artist studios as permitted uses
in this zone; and expressed staff's belief that it's fair to say that parking requirements for an
artist's studio are different than a manufacturing use and that it doesn't seem equitable to
apply a retail parking requirement on a business when a substantial portion of the time it
doesn't function in that manner.
Commissioner Hoffman stated that it would be difficult for the Planning Commission to
anticipate how this studio will operate since it is not yet in business; and noted his concern with
reducing the parking requirement.
Director Blumenfeld noted for Vice -Chair Pizer that the tenant has recently leased this
property, commenced with completing the addition of a mezzanine which was started by the
previous tenant; and stated that it is not staff's intent to dissuade the use which is allowed in
this zone, but that it's simply to try to understand how the use can be parked.
Director Blumenfeld noted for Vice -Chair Pizer that the mezzanine construction was done
without benefit of a permit; and suggested that the Planning Commission may wish to indicate
that it wants warehouse parking requirements as allowed parking requirements in this zone;
that the owner file a covenant on the property; and that if the business works into a more retail
sales oriented business, then the City could address this issue by means of code enforcement
activity.
Chairman Perrotti noted his support that the owner file a recorded covenant if this is ultimately
determined to be a warehouse use.
Commissioner Tucker suggested that the parking be limited to the hours that the tenant can
allow the public into the building.
Director Blumenfeld advised that the owner could be required to process a parking plan and
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 2002, Page 10 of 11
that the parking plan could be conditioned.
For comparison and consistency purposes, Chairman Perrotti requested that staff research
what was done with parking at the building on the corner of Hermosa Avenue and 10th Street.
Following further discussion, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission to request a
plan which describes each aspect of the business; that the tenant file a parking plan and
process a discretionary permit; and that this type of matter be treated on a case -by -case basis.
Director Blumenfeld noted for Vice -Chair Pizer that a precedent problem won't be created if a
discretionary permit process is undertaken.
Responding to Commissioner Kersenboom's inquiry, Director Blumenfeld explained that each
tenant is allocated two parking spaces; that there exists common parking along the southerly
side of the lot; that additional parking is located at the back next to another industrial building
with the same parking configuration; and that under the current code, there are not enough
parking spaces at this site to accommodate all the manufacturing uses on site.
13. Commissioner Items
In response to Commissioner Tucker's inquiry regarding a follow-up of the Economic
Enhancement Commission's presentation to City Council„ Director Blumenfeld expressed his
belief that City Council is considering some of those economic development recommendations
as part of the goals program; and stated that some of these issues will be discussed at the
Thursday budget meeting.
Director Blumenfeld noted for Commissioner Tucker that he will research what is being done in
regard to the sandwich board signs on the plaza.
Addressing Commissioner Tucker's inquiry regarding the status of increasing the amount of
square footage for R-3 condo lots from 1,350 to 1,750, Director Blumenfeld explained that this
issue has been tabled until the City has completed and adopted its Housing Element.
14. Adjournment
MOTION by Chairman Perrotti, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, for adjournment at
9:57 P.M. This meeting was formally adjourned in the memory of Jack Wood. There being no
objection, it was so ordered.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing Minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken
by the Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of May 21,
200
may"
am Perrotti, Chairman Sol T m mnfeld, Secretary
l� a&0
ate
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 2002, Page 11 of 11