Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-12-05 PC Minutes Regular MeetingMINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HELD ON DECEMBER 5, 2001, AT 7:00 P.M. AT THE HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL, MULTI -PURPOSE ROOM The meeting was called to order by Vice -Chair Pizer at 7:00 p.m. Commissioner Kersenboom led the pledge of allegiance. Roll Call Present: Commissioners Hoffman, Tucker, Kersenboom, and Vice -Chair Pizer Absent: Chairman Perrotti Also Present:, Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development Director Michael Schubach, City Planner Bob Goldin, Project Manager, City of Hermosa Beach Diane Cleary, Recording Secretary CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Tucker, to APPROVE the November 20, 2001 Planning Commission minutes. Hearing no objections, Vice -Chair Pizer so ordered. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Tucker, to APPROVE Resolutions P.C. 01-36. Hearing no objections, Vice -Chair Pizer so ordered. 5. Item(s) for consideration Director Blumenfeld referred to Resolution P.C. 01-32 and suggested that this item be continued and heard when Chairman Perrotti is present. He also said that the Commission received a supplemental memo from PCR stating that the proposed umbrellas will be consistent with previously approved materials and color scheme and will not affect the historical or architectural significance of the building. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom, to APPROVE Resolutions P.C. 01-32. AYES: Hoffman, Tucker, Kersenboom, Vice -Chair Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: Perrotti ABSTAIN: None 6. ORAL/WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None, P.C. Minutes 12-05-01 PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. PDP 01-10 — PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLANIPRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 01-10 AND FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, TO ALLOW TYCOM NETWORKS INC. TO INSTALL TWO UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC CABLES, EACH WITH SELF-CONTAINED POWER, ONTO THE CONTINENTAL SHELF AND LANDING AT TWO BEACH LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (A NORTH LANDING AT LONGFELLOW AVENUE AND A SOUTH LANDING AT 2ND STREET) WITH UNDERGROUND CABLE CONNECTIONS LOCATED IN PUBLIC PROPERTY TO A CABLE STATION IN REDONDO BEACH (CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 20, 2001 MEETING). Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said request. Director Blumenfeld gave a staff report and pointed out that tonight after taking testimony and considering the project, if the Commission decides to recommend approval, there will be several Resolutions for consideration for the project development permits and all the environmental considerations. Bob Goldin, Project Manager, gave an overview of the recent changes proposed by TyCom and said that the Longfellow Avenue landing site has been eliminated. Also, TyCom has chosen to do a direct burial method for installation for the beach portion which reduces the timeframe from the original proposal down to 7 to 10 days. He also stated that the Environmental Impact Report does conclude that the all of the impacts have been reduced and mitigated to a level of insignificance with the exception of air quality which will require a statement of overriding considerations. He reviewed the following changes: Condition No. 75 — Revised to require mitigation for air quality out to three nautical miles only. Condition No. 33 —Eliminated. Condition No. 117 — Added, which will make TyCom responsible for restoring all the work within the streets in a manner and time approved by the Public Works Department. He said the applicant does concur with all the Conditions of Approval including all new ones. He requested that the Commission approve the Mitigation Monitoring Program and eliminate all disparities that now exist and to match the Conditions of Approval. He stated that the project as conditioned protects the City, the environment and allows TyCom to proceed with their project based on these requirements. He said that the City Council will be meeting to discuss the terms associated with the lease agreement. He indicated that the Planning Commission is to look at the lease ensuring that it is consistent with the City's General Plan. He further said that no letters of opposition have been received since the last meeting and staff recommends approval. 2 P.C. Minutes 12-05-01 Chris Brungardt, Project Manager, Brungardt Honomichl & Company, stated that the Longfellow landing has been eliminated in response to public and agency input. From a technical standpoint landing both cables is very similar to landing just one cable at one point, with the same staging area size and the same trench depth being used. It will take slightly longer, however, to complete the operation at approximately 7 to 10 days. Also, only one ground bed will be used. Off shore with the cables in the water, the cables will be separated by a dimension of one times the water depth. From a terrestrial standpoint, the work on land beyond the beach will be exactly the same as for the 2nd Street landing. He said that they expect to begin work this spring. He further indicated that they agree with the condition to remove the cable beyond the pier when it needs to be retired and beyond that, application to the appropriate agencies will be made for the removal. TyCom concurs with the conditions presented tonight. Jim Janes, Ecology and Environment, stated that they evaluated the project as proposed by TyCom,, identified feasible mitigation and potentially significant impacts and evaluated and assessed feasible alternatives such as a direct landing method and a single cable landing at 2nd Street. He reviewed comments received such as request for additional information and analysis, clarifications, corrections and objections to the proposed project. He stated that any revisions to the draft Environmental Impact Report were reported in the final Environmental Impact Report. He also noted that a supplemental environmental analysis was prepared. He said that they have determined that the current proposal was adequately addressed in the draft Environmental Impact Report under Alternatives 5 and 7 and that no additional significant impacts would result. Also, all impacts have been reduced to a less than significant level with a statement of overriding considerations required for air quality impacts. He said TyCom has agreed to mitigate impacts for air emission inside the three nautical miles limit but not beyond. He further said that the Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared, taking all of the mitigation measures identified and agreed to by TyCom. He indicated that TyCom is responsible for implementing all of the mitigation measures and the City is responsible for making sure that this happens. Most of the mitigation measures will be implemented during the construction phase of the project which will be taken on directly by the City. In summary, the project currently proposed by TyCom has been adequately assessed in the documents that were provided and the supplemental analysis provides the assessment and documentation. In response to Commissioner Hoffman, Mr. Brungardt stated that the duration of air quality impacts within three miles would be a couple of weeks. In response to Vice -Chair Pizer, Director Blumenfeld said that the City will solicit proposals to qualified firms to assist with the overall mitigation monitoring plans with the cost paid by the applicant. All of the environmental monitoring costs required by the City would be paid for by the applicant for the term of the contract. In response to Vice -Chair Pizer, Mr. Brungardt explained that the cables will be buried as deep as possible, 2 meters in the surf zone. He said that the cables are flexible enough where it will continue to bury itself over time, and as the sand shifts, it liquifies somewhat, allowing the cable to settle further. He also said the cable could become exposed for a storm event, but unlikely on the beach. However, it would settle to the current grade and then fill again. It is proposed that if the cable becomes exposed, TyCom will come back and rebury it if necessary. 3 P.C. Minutes 12-05-01 In response to Commissioner Hoffman, Mr. Brungardt said that the top of the ground bed would be at least 10 feet to the top. Manager Goldin explained that through the terms of the agreement, provisions have been made to ensure that TyCom is obligated to pay for exposure costs if exposure occurs. They will also monitor the sand migration over the next few years. In response to Vice -Chair Pizer, Director Goldin said that through the conditions, there is extensive public notification in advance to the construction. Director Blumenfeld further explained that the applicant will be required as one of the mitigation measures to submit a construction operation plan. In response to Vice -Chair Pizer, Director Blumenfeld stated that there is discussion concerning an adjustment factor in the contract. Vice -Chair Pizer opened the public hearing. Barbara Elmand questioned the public notice process, air quality impacts during the two -week period, and revenue received by the City. She further asked why Longfellow was chosen to be removed for cable installation rather than 2°d Street. Director Blumenfeld said that the pollution impacts would be a short-term effect. Also, the TyCom is currently negotiating a lease agreement for use of City owned property which will have to be approved in order for the project to move forward. This will be heard at City Council. Manager Goldin explained the public notification process and also explained that TyCom's switching station is at 811 Catalina, Redondo Beech, and the end, Street landing would be the logical place for cable placement to minimize construction the City. Rich Walter clarified that TyCom has agreed to implement mitigation for the terrestrial emission and the offshore emissions out to three nautical miles offshore. Manager Goldin also explained that this project after completed will be similar to a cable TV or telephone line going into the streets, and there will be no impacts such as noise, traffic, etc. with no safety impacts. Ruth Lloyd questioned the benefits to the City with this project. Manager Goldin said that the City will receive compensation for the use of the underground land. The cable would be a carrier's carrier and will buy capacity on the cable system and allow users to have better access to the transpacific loop. Jane Dixon asked about the environmental impacts. 4 P.C. Minutes 12-05-01 Manager Goldin explained that there will be three segments, the marine segment lasting approximately 12 to 24 days, the beach segment lasting 7 to 10 days and then 2nd Street would be approximately a two to three-week process. The entire project should take approximately two months, and after completion, there would be no outstanding environmental impacts. He also said there would be no out-of-pocket expenses for the City in monitoring all programs during construction. After construction, there would be no need for further monitoring. In response to Ms. Dixon, Director Blumenfeld explained that the lease terms include a one-time entry license fee and in addition, there would be an annual payment which would run with the term of the lease. He also said since the lease is still being negotiated, it is unsure if there will be an exit payment or release clause but with respect to retirement, at the termination of the lease term, the applicant will be required to remove the cable to a depth of about 15 meters or a distance of about the end of the pier. Also, a condition is being considered where the City would have an opportunity to comment on assigning of the lease. He also said there is currently no cost/benefit analysis, however, the financial benefits of the lease agreement will be considered at the Council hearing. In response to Jeanna Deressa, Manager Goldin explained that the cable would be for Internet service and voice transmission via fiberoptic cables with no emissions. Jerry Compton asked how much disruption would be involved in the seabed with the trenching at the beach line as it runs through the surf line. Mr. Brungardt explained that the cable will be installed through the surf zone with the use of a jetting method to liquify the sand with one or two passes. With proper moisture when back filling the trench, it will stay compacted. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Mr. Brungardt said that the work will be performed during the low sand time in the surf zone. He also said that the work will be plotted with Dig Alert and USA. Vice -Chair Pizer closed the public hearing. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Mr. Brungardt said that they will need a trench across of the ground beds to connect together and bring them back into the trench that goes to the beach manhole. The fence was not shown because it will only be needed for a day or two. He also said that they have to be at least 150 feet from any other grounded or steel structure. Also the third staging area would be in Redondo Beach. He also said fuel will not be stored, and mobile fuel will be brought in a designated area and properly contained. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Director Blumenfeld stated that many of the requirements are incorporated in the EIR and resolution as general Public Works conditions and that when issuing an encroachment permit the applicant will be required to bond for improvements in the street. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Mr. Brungardt said that they don't expect to need night work, however, they would like the ability for night work during the pulling of cables to shore, since this operation needs to be completed once it is started and night work may be necessary. P.C. Minutes 12-05-01 In response to Commissioner Tucker, Manager Goldin said that TyCom would be obligated to notify the public of any night work. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Mr. Brungardt said there may be survey targets set up for when the ship comes in but only during construction. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Director Blumenfeld said that the funds will be allocated from the license fee amount and the annual payments to beach -related improvements. Commissioner Hoffman expressed concern with the project extending into the summer months and questioned the benefits to the City, which the City Council will address. Commissioner Pizer expressed approval of the project and believed that one landing site makes more sense and makes the project much simpler. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom to RECOMMEND that the City Council approve the Planned Development Permit/Precise Development Plan No. 01-10 subject to conditions in the attached Resolution. AYES: Hoffman, Tucker, Kersenboom, Vice -Chair Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: Chairman Perrotti ABSTAIN: None MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom to RECOMMEND that the City Council direct staff to modify the Mitigation Monitoring Program to reflect a single landing at Second Street utilizing a direct burial. AYES: Hoffman, Tucker, Kersenboom, Vice -Chair Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: Chairman Perrotti ABSTAIN: None MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom to RECOMMEND that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report, including a Mitigation Monitoring Program, Findings and Facts in Support of findings and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations relating to air quality. AYES: Hoffman, Tucker, Kersenboom, Vice -Chair Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: Chairman Perrotti ABSTAIN: None 6 P.C. Minutes 12-05-01 MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Kersenboom to RECOMMEND that the City Council find that the lease agreement is consistent with the General Plan. AYES: Hoffman, Tucker, Kersenboom, Vice -Chair Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: Chairman Perrotti ABSTAIN: None The Commission took a break at 8:30 p.m. The Commission reconvened at 8:40 p.m. 8. VAR 01-3 — VARIANCE TO PARKING AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW A 750 SQUARE FOOT SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A DWELLING WITH ONE PARKING SPACE AND A LESS THAN THREE FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK AT 55 5TH COURT (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 16 AND NOVEMBER 20, 2001 MEETINGS). Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. City Planner Schubach gave a staff report and said that the side yards are smaller and the rear yard is slightly larger than what is shown on the plan, and open space is still non -conforming. The applicant is asking to expand larger than the 250 square feet normally allowed which will require a Variance. He further reviewed the four findings needed to grant a Variance. Vice -Chair Pizer opened the public hearing. Jack Wood said a Variance is needed to allow for a single garage. He said that the remodel would be modest and affordable. The only other option would be to tear the house down which would be quite costly. He believed that the findings could be made due to the lot being very small, and the building being built with no parking space and too close to the front and sides. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Mr. Wood believed that the home was built in the 1950's with the illegal subdivision occurring in 1953 or 1954. However prior to 1953, the records are not clear. Nancy Winters, applicant, said she bought the home in 1993 and would love a place to park her car at her house. She said she often works late and has to drive around for ten minutes, ending up five blocks away. Jerry Compton said that 250 square feet is allowed to be added with no penalty for a garage. He said the lot is very small which needs a Variance. Vice -Chair Pizer closed the public hearing. 7 P.C. Minutes 12-05-01 Commissioner Tucker believed that the lot is unusual, the applicant has a right to a garage and the home is not out of scale with the neighborhood. He expressed approval for a Variance. Commissioner Kersenboom noted that the home will only be two -stories and will not tower over any of the neighbors. Commissioner Hoffman said that the Commission is bound by law to make findings, and he said he cannot make finding No. 2. Vice -Chair Pizer said he can make the findings, since the home will fit in with the neighborhood and no curb cuts will be created. Director Blumenfeld reviewed the four variance findings for Commissioner consideration. MOTION by Commissioner Kersenboom, seconded by Commissioner Tucker to APPROVE VAR 01-3 — Variance to parking and setback requirements to allow a 750 square foot second story addition to a dwelling with one parking space and a less than three foot side yard setback at 55 5'h Court. AYES: Tucker, Kersenboom, Vice -Chair Pizer NOES: Hoffman ABSENT: Chairman Perrotti ABSTAIN: None 9. CON 01-14/PDP 01-17 — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.26483 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION PROJECT AT 1015 & 1017 17TH STREET (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 16 AND NOVEMBER 20, 2001 MEETINGS). Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. City Planner Schubach gave a staff report and reviewed the following alternative recommendations: 1. To deny the project as submitted because it does not conform to the Condominium Conversion Ordinance. 2. To approve the project subject to reducing the building height of the rear unit to conform to the Condominium Conversion Ordinance. He stated that staff believed that the lot has a convex slope, however, the rear unit still is above height. He said that the applicant believes that the front of the lot had been graded lower, causing the project to be slightly over -height. However, staff could not find any data in the file confirming that this is correct. Vice -Chair Pizer opened the public hearing. 8 P.C. Minutes 12-05-01 Elizabeth Srour, representing the applicant, stated that their goal is to provide two owner -occupied homes on the property. The neighborhood is primarily owner occupied, and the proposal would be very complimentary to the surrounding neighborhood and would be beneficial to the City. In the conversion process, the Code addresses issues which have been provided to the staff. Also, this development proposal incorporates designs and amenities. Each unit enjoys equal use of the property� 1 p g, p p° greatly requirements. The such as open space, parking, and. the open ace reatl exceeds �' rear 45 feet of the lot is undeveloped. Also, because of the driveway configuration, there is plenty of room for additional parking when the need arises. The property is adjacent to a condominium project built several years ago, and there is a shared driveway easement between the two properties, which would benefit both properties. She believed that there is a third alternative which is to approve this application based on the record contained within the City files related to the design and construction of this building as well as the survey. She noted that the information available to the City today does not contain all of the information required in a condominium development today. This project was built per Code at the time in 1981 with plans with elevations and survey of record and inspected by City staff and it was determined that the building did comply with the 30-foot height limit at that time. Taking today's methodology for evaluating the height using the numbers on the plans, the buildings do comply with the height. She also believed that the sidewalk was cut into the grade, accounting for lower grade points on the front portion of the property, She presented a photograph which depicts that the natural grade to the property to the east continues all the way to the curb and has altered the natural topography. She believed that this conversion is appropriate for the site, and she asked that the City's records be accepted which were appropriate, thorough and complete at the time. Michael Roughen, applicant, said that this project is appropriate for a conversion since it conforms with the existing neighborhood and said when he purchased the property, he accepted the City's records when it was constructed which were accurate. The project will give two more homeowners three -bedroom units with an ocean view and more affordable housing. Vice -Chair Pizer closed the public hearing. Director Blumenfeld explained that the conversion section of the Condominium Ordinance is lengthy and said that there is not enough information to know if this project will conform to the City Codes with respect to height. Also, there is not good evidence as to how the height was measured in the 80s. He suggested working with the applicant/architect to see if the adjacent property provides evidence to act on this request that would substantiate the applicant's claim. Vice -Chair Pizer reopened the public hearing. Robert Treman stated he has the survey for the adjacent property, however, with the shared driveway, both of the driveways at some point in time were cut into the natural slope of the property. The existing buildings do not exceed 30 feet in height at any point. He also believed that it would be an eyesore to drop one of the buildings down by 6 inches to satisfy the requirements. Mr. Roughen said there are elevations on the plot plan that were in the approved set of plans applying the numbers to the current methodology complying to the 30-foot height limit today. 9 P.C. Minutes 12-05-01 Vice -Chair Pizer closed the public hearing. Vice -Chair Pizer said that the evidence is the City's records and the buildings were inspected and built in 1981 and complied. Director Blumenfeld said that the project will have to conform to all of the requirements under the Building Code and Zoning Ordinance, including the height issue. MOTION by Commissioner Kersenboom, seconded by Commissioner Hoffman, to APPROVE CON 01-14/PDP 01-17 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development. Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 26483 for a two -unit condominium conversion project at 1,015 & 1017 17' Street. AYES: Hoffman, Tucker, Kersenboom, Vice -Chair Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: Chairman Perrotti ABSTAIN: None 10. CUP 01-6 — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON -SALE ALCOHOL IN THE GUEST ROOMS (MINI -BARS) AND IN THE BANQUET ROOMS IN CONJUNCTION WITH EVENTS FOR HOTEL GUESTS AT THE BEACH HOUSE HOTEL AT 1300 THE STRAND. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Director Blumenfeld gave a staff report and reviewed the request. He said a special license is required by ABC with strict limitations for alcohol sales which would be reflected in the conditions. The applicant would dispense alcohol in sealed containers in mini -bars in the guest rooms and for catered events, and would serve alcohol in conjunction with the use of the banquet facilities and meeting rooms. All alcohol would be billable to hotel guests. Staff believes that with the conditions in the attached Resolution that the project CUP should be approved. Vice -Chair Pizer opened the public hearing. Kevin McCarthy, General Manager, stated that this opportunity would allow him to provide an additional service to the guests. He also said that this service has been requested by the guests. He noted that the request would only enhance their revenues by 5 percent. Also, the guests would pay for this themselves and would be paid on checkout, and the refrigeration and locked cabinets are already in place. Vice -Chair Pizer closed the public hearing. Commissioner Hoffman expressed approval for the request. In response to Commissioner Tucker, Director Blumenfeld said this would be a permit to allow sale of alcohol only within the guest rooms and banquet rooms. 10 P.C. Minutes 12-05-01 Vice -Chair Pizer pointed out that the alcohol would only be sold to the guests, not the general public and is not a cash business. He expressed approval for the request. MOTION by Commissioner Tucker, seconded by Chairman Hoffman, to APPROVE CUP 01-6 — Conditional Use Permit to allow on -sale alcohol in the guest rooms (mini -bars) and in the banquet rooms in conjunction with events for hotel guests at the Beach House Hotel at 1300 The Strand. AYES: Hoffman, Tucker, Kersenboom, Vice -Chair Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: Chairman Perrotti ABSTAIN: None 11. NR 01-4 —REMODEL AND ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING NONCONFORMING TO PARKING SETBACK AND GUEST PARKING RESULTING IN A GREATER THAN 50% INCREASE IN VALUATION AT 608 1ST STREET. Staff Recommended Action: To continue to January 15, 2002 meeting. City Planner Schubach stated that the applicant and staff are requesting a continuance to the January 15, 2002 meeting. Vice -Chair Pizer opened the public hearing. Vice -Chair Pizer closed the public hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Tucker, to CONTINUE NR 01-4 —Remodel and addition to an existing single family dwelling non -conforming to parking setback and guest parking resulting in a greater than 50% increase in valuation at 608 1 Street. AYES: Hoffman, Tucker, Kersenboom, Vice -Chair Pizer NOES: None ABSENT: Chairman Perrotti ABSTAIN: None 12. TEXT 01-7 — SIGN ORDINANCE STUDY ON CURRENT PROHIBITION OF SIDEWALK SIGNS (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 18, OCTOBER 16 AND NOVEMBER 20, 2001 MEETINGS). Staff Recommended Action: To forward to Public Works Commission for review and comments before setting for public hearing. 11 P.C. Minutes 12-05-01 Director Blumenfeld gave a staff report and said that any proposed changes involving the Municipal Code should also be referred to the Public Works Commission for review and consideration. He further pointed out that there are many opportunities for pedestrian level signage and he reviewed draft wording on page 3 of the staff report. Vice -Chair Pizer opened the public hearing. Vice -Chair Pizer closed the public hearing. Commissioner Hoffman expressed concern with the loss of pedestrian friendly signage and excessive use of corporate logos. He also said that the changes to the text should be addressed by the Economic Review Committee and he believed these changes would not benefit the City. In response to Commissioner Kersenboom, Director Blumenfeld explained that a moratorium would be an interim ordinance, having special requirements. These changes presented tonight would be a permanent change to the text that would amend the Sign Code and would not be a trial. He also said he would have to investigate with the City Attorney whether a law could be put in effect on a temporary basis. Commissioner Tucker presented a proposed design of sidewalk signage. In response to Director Blumenfeld, Commissioner Tucker noted that most sidewalk signs are generally by the entry door of the business. Vice -Chair Pizer suggested a standard design such as a round base with a pole, 18 inches maximum, with 12-inch clearance from the ground to the beginning of the sign. Also, that a permit and review fee be required. This signage could be done on a temporary basis if possible. He also would like this forwarded to the Public Works Commission. In response to Commissioner Hoffman, Director Blumenfeld said that the joint meeting with Public Works will be held in February, and he suggested forwarding this item to discuss at that time. MOTION by Commissioner Kersenboom, seconded by Commissioner Tucker, AGREED BY MINUTE ORDER to table TEXT 01-7 — Sign Ordinance study on current prohibition of sidewalk signs to the joint meeting in February with the Public Works Commission and to incorporate this evening's discussion. AYES: Tucker, Kersenboom, Vice -Chair Pizer NOES: Hoffman ABSENT: Chairman Perrotti ABSTAIN: None 13. STAFF ITEMS a. Memorandum regarding modification to approved plans at 228 Ardmore Avenue for a two -unit condominium. 12 P.C. Minutes 12-05-01 Director Blumenfeld gave a staff report and said the project had gone through several revisions, resulting in some changes relative to parking and the overall appearance of the structure. The issue before the Commission has to do with a reconfiguration of some decks and whether or not it is a minor modification. Jerry Compton explained that since the project was originally designed, six condominiums units were built next door, creating the deck to be down in a hole. He requested that the decks be raised. The Commission AGREED BY MINUTE ORDER that the change is minor. b. Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. C. Community Development Department Activity Report of October, 2001. d. City Council minutes of November 13, 2001. 14. COMMISSIONER ITEMS The following items were recommended to be forwarded to the Public Works Department: • Sidewalk sign issue • Landscaping on the right-of-way • Street tree planting • Parking impacts as it relates to street standards • Signage on'Pier Plaza The Commission wished everyone Happy Holidays. 15. ADJOURNMENT The Commission ADJOURNED the meeting at 10:10 p.m. No objections, so ordered. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of December 5, 2001. Ron Pizer, Vice Clair Can /l Ool- Date Sol lluroe fl ,Secretary T�! P.C. Minutes 12-05-01