Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-28-2020 - Agenda Pkg - CC Regular Meeting
City Council City of Hermosa Beach Regular Meeting Agenda - Final City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Mayor Mary Campbell Mayor Pro Tem Justin Massey Councilmembers Hany S. Fangary Michael Detoy Stacey Armato 6:00 PMTuesday, July 28, 2020 Closed Session - Cancelled Regular Meeting - 6:00 P.M. Duly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. 1 July 28, 2020City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION (CANCELLED) CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENT City Hall will be closed to the public until further notice. Virtual Meetings are held pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on March 17, 2020. Members of the public may also participate by phone. JOIN THE VIRTUAL MEETING BY PHONE: 1. Email Anny@hermosabeach.gov to be added to the speaker list. 2. Dial-in to meeting: •Toll Free: 833-548-0282 •Meeting ID: 833 2169 1331 , then # •Participant ID: press # to bypass 3. ATTENDEES WILL BE MUTED UNTIL THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PERIOD IS OPENED. When you are called on to speak, press * 6 to unmute your line. Comments from the public are limited to 3 minutes per speaker. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION 1.20-0458 MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on July 14, 2020. 2.20-0482 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Initiation of Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Number of cases: One ADJOURNMENT Page 2 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/27/2024 2 July 28, 2020City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final 6:00 P.M. - REGULAR AGENDA PUBLIC PARTICIPATION City Hall will be closed to the public until further notice. Virtual Meetings are held pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on March 17, 2020. Members of the public may email comments to Esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov or submit eComments until 3:00 p.m. on the meeting date. Members of the public may also participate by phone. JOIN THE VIRTUAL MEETING AT: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87032785286 OR PARTICIPATE BY PHONE: 1. Email Esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov to be added to the speaker list. Please indicate which item you would like to speak on. 2. Dial-in to meeting: •Toll Free: 877-853-5257 •Meeting ID: 870 3278 5286, then # •Participant ID: press # to bypass 3. ATTENDEES WILL BE MUTED UNTIL THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PERIOD IS OPENED. When you are called on to speak, press * 6 to unmute your line. Comments from the public are limited to 3 minutes per speaker. Oral and Written Communication Persons who wish to have written materials included in the agenda packet at the time the agenda is published on the City's website must submit the written materials to the City Manager's office by email (esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov) or in person by noon of the Tuesday, one week before the meeting date. Written materials pertaining to matters listed on the posted agenda received after the agenda has been posted will be added as supplemental materials under the relevant agenda item on the City's website at the same time as they are distributed to the City Council by email. Supplemental materials may be submitted via eComment (instructions below) or emailed to esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov. Supplemental materials must be received before 4:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting to ensure Council and staff have the ability to review materials prior to the meeting. Supplemental materials submitted after 4:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting or submitted during the meeting will be posted online the next day. Submit Supplemental eComments in three easy steps: Note: Your comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name, but please do not provide any other personal information (i.e. phone numbers, addresses, etc) that you do not want to be published. 1. Go to the Agendas/Minutes/Video webpage and find the meeting you’d like to submit comments on. Click on the eComment button for your selected meeting. 2. Find the agenda item for which you would like to provide a comment. You can select a specific agenda item/project or provide general comments under the Oral/Written Communications item. 3. Sign in to your SpeakUp Hermosa Account or as a guest, enter your comment in the field provided, provide your name, and if applicable, attach files before submitting your comment. Page 3 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/27/2024 3 July 28, 2020City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION REPORT ANNOUNCEMENTS APPROVAL OF AGENDA PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS a)20-0459 COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a)20-0460 COVID-19 UPDATE b)20-0468 INTRODUCTION OF FIRE STATION 100 B SHIFT CREW c)20-0461 UPDATE FROM CITY DELEGATE TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY WEST VECTOR & VECTOR BORNE DISEASE CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda as a business item. 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: If you wish to provide public comment, please fill out a speaker card to ensure names of speakers are correctly recorded in the minutes and where appropriate, to provide contact information for staff follow-up. This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction not on this agenda, on items on this agenda as to which public comment will not be taken (Miscellaneous Items and Reports – City Council and Other Matters), or to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar. Public comments on the agenda items called Miscellaneous Reports and Other Matters will only be heard at this time. Comments on public hearing items are heard only during the public hearing. Members of the audience may also speak: Page 4 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/27/2024 4 July 28, 2020City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final a)20-0487 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the written communication. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 4, with public comment permitted at that time. a)REPORT 20-0466 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following minutes: 1. March 16, 2020 Regular Meeting 2. July 14, 2020 Adjourned Regular Meeting b)REPORT 20-0453 CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the following check registers. c)REPORT 20-0478 REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR JUNE 2020 (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the June 2020 Financial Reports. d)REPORT 20-0467 CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Recommendation:The City Treasurer recommends that the City Council receive and file the June 2020 City Treasurer's Report and Cash Balance Report. e)REPORT 20-0479 CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Recommendation:The City Treasurer recommends that the City Council approve cancellation of certain checks. f)REPORT 20-0471 ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 20, 2020 Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of May 20, 2020. g)REPORT 20-0475 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF JULY 21, 2020 (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of July 21, 2020. Page 5 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/27/2024 5 July 28, 2020City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final h)REPORT 20-0456 ACTION SHEET OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 21, 2020 Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the action sheet of the Planning Commission meeting of July 21, 2020. i)REPORT 20-0457 PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the August 18, 2020 Planning Commission tentative future agenda items. j)REPORT 20-0481 APPROVE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND STAR EDUCATION TO PROVIDE CHILDCARE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN ENROLLED IN THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT (Community Resources Manager Kelly Orta) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve a three-year lease agreement with STAR Education to provide childcare services for children enrolled in the Hermosa Beach City School District; and 2. Add estimated lease revenue of $19,115 to the 2020-21 Budget. k)REPORT 20-0486 EASY READER 50th ANNIVERSARY AD (City Manager Suja Lowenthal) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council consider a request from Mayor Mary Campbell and Mayor Pro Tem Massey funding a half- or full-page ad celebrating the Easy Reader's 50th anniversary and encouraging constituents and South Bay neighbors to support a free and local press. 3. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M. Page 6 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/27/2024 6 July 28, 2020City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final a)REPORT 20-0480 C 42 #9- CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR A MURAL DISPLAY MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 3,376 SQUARE FEET ON THE WEST FACING BUILDING WALL OF THE HISTORIC BIJOU BUILDING LOCATED AT 1221 HERMOSA AVENUE AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15301 AND 15061(B)(3) UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommendation:Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution, thereby approving a Certificate of Appropriateness (C 42 #9) for a mural display measuring approximately 3,376 square feet on the west facing building wall of the historic Bijou building located at 1221 Hermosa Avenue and determining that the project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Sections 15301 and 15061(b)(3) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a)REPORT 20-0484 ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, THAT REQUIRES MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO WEAR FACE COVERINGS; AND TO CONFIRM CITY MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 2020-09 REGARDING SUSPENDING LOCAL ZONING REGULATIONS TO PERMIT SPECIFIED BUSINESSES TO OPERATE OUTDOORS AND TO PERMIT CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS TO OPERATE WITHOUT A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOCATION DURING THE COVID-19 CRISIS (City Attorney Michael Jenkins) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Confirm City Manager/Director of Emergency Services Executive Order No. 2020-09, to temporarily permit: (1) gyms, fitness facilities, hair salons, barbershops and personal care establishments to operate outdoors and (2) home occupations to operate without a commercial business location during the COVID-19 crisis (Attachment 1); and 2. Adopt an Urgency Ordinance No. 20-1415U of the City of Hermosa Beach, to implement the measures in Executive Order No. 2020-09 and to require members of the public to wear face coverings whenever outside of their place of residence (Attachment 2). The urgency ordinance requires four-fifths vote of the City Council and if approved, will take effect immediately. Page 7 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/27/2024 7 July 28, 2020City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final b)REPORT 20-0462 RECEIVE REPORT ON EMERGENCY ENFORCEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH PANDEMIC-RELATED HEALTH ORDERS FROM BOTH THE CITY AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES HEALTH DEPARTMENT (City Manager Suja Lowenthal) (This report was published as a supplemental report in order to deliver the most current information available) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Receive the update on current enforcement efforts; and 2. Authorize the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services to contract with additional Code Enforcement and/or security personnel to supplement current efforts to ensure compliance with Los Angeles County Public Health Officer Orders, including the face covering mandate and limits on sporting activities on the beach and in parks. c)REPORT 20-0483 ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING AND EXTENDING THE DURATION THE OF TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON FORECLOSURES AND RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL EVICTIONS FOR NONPAYMENT OF RENT DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC (City Attorney Michael Jenkins and Assistant City Attorney Lauren Langer) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an Urgency Ordinance No 20-1414U of the City of Hermosa Beach extending and amending the temporary moratorium on evictions during the COVID-19 pandemic and setting forth the facts constituting such urgency. The Urgency Ordinance requires four-fifths vote of the City Council and if approved, will take effect immediately. d)REPORT 20-0472 REVIEW OF CITY’S PARKING ASSET RESTRICTIONS IN LIGHT OF ONGOING CHANGES TO THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY HEALTH ORDER (City Manager Suja Lowenthal) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council evaluate the current restrictions of the City's downtown parking lots, and consider temporarily permitting individuals that have purchased annual business owner/employee permits the opportunity to park in the City's downtown 'Lot C' parking structure. Page 8 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/27/2024 8 July 28, 2020City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final e)REPORT 20-0426 APPROVE CONTRACT WITH UNITED STORM WATER INC. TO PURCHASE AND INSTALL STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN SCREEN DEVICES ON CITY AND COUNTY-OWNED STORM DRAINS FOR CIP 419 (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Find, based on the information contained in this report, that competitive bidding would not produce any advantage and waive the competitive bidding requirement otherwise required; 2. Authorize the Director of Public Works to execute a contract with United Storm Water, Inc. for installation of connector pipe screens on 192 catch basins for an amount not to exceed $88,563.00; 3. Authorize a 10% construction contingency of $8,856 for a total project budget of $97,419; 4. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the Professional Services Agreement(s) subject to approval by the City Attorney; and 5. Authorize the Director of Public Works to file a Notice of Completion following final completion of the project. f)REPORT 20-0409 AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS TO PROVIDE ON-CALL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Award a Professional Services Agreement to Koury Engineering & Testing Inc., MTGL Inc. and to Smith Emery Laboratories Inc., for an amount not to exceed $300,000 each, to provide on-call Geotechnical services to the City of Hermosa Beach for three years with the option to extend for up to two additional one-year terms; and 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the Professional Services Agreement(s) subject to approval by the City Attorney. g)REPORT 20-0463 DISSOLUTION OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, THE CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH, THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, THE CITY OF TORRANCE, AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RELATED TO DESIGN OF JOINT REGIONAL PROJECTS WITHIN THE SMB 6-01 ANALYSIS REGION OF THE ENHANCED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (EWMP) FOR THE BEACH CITIES WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GROUP (Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss) Recommendation:Staff recommends that City Council: 1. Approve the dissolution of Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Hermosa Beach, the City of Manhattan Beach, the City of Redondo Beach, the City of Torrance, and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District related to design of joint regional projects within the SMB 6-01 analysis region of the Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP) for the Beach Cities Watershed Management Group; and 2. Reappropriate $160,000 from the Capital Improvement Fund for Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 542 in the 2019-20 Budget to the 2020-21 Budget to fund a feasibility study as outlined in the dissolution of the MOU. Page 9 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/27/2024 9 July 28, 2020City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a)REPORT 20-0474 VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - EXPIRATION OF TERMS CIVIL SERVICE BOARD APPOINTMENTS (City Clerk Eduardo Sarmiento) Recommendation:The City Clerk recommends that the City Council: 1. Appoint two Civil Service Board applicants to four-year terms ending July 15, 2024; OR 2. Direct the City Clerk to immediately re-advertise and invite applications from all interested parties. b)REPORT 20-0477 UPCOMING VACANCIES: THREE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION TERMS EXPIRE OCTOBER 31, 2020 (City Clerk Eduardo Sarmiento) Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council direct the City Clerk's office to immediately advertise the three upcoming board/commission term expirations and invite applications from all interested parties. c)20-0465 UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES 8. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL a)20-0485 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Recommendation:Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the tentative future agenda items. ADJOURNMENT Page 10 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/27/2024 10 July 28, 2020City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final FUTURE MEETINGS AND CITY HOLIDAYS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS: August 11, 2020 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting August 25, 2020 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting September 2, 2020 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session September 8, 2020 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting September 22, 2020 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting October 7, 2020 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session October 13, 2020 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting October 27, 2020 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting November 4, 2020 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session November 10, 2020 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting November 12, 2020 - Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Appointment of Mayor & Mayor Pro Tem November 24, 2020 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting December 2, 2020 - Wednesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM - Study Session December 8, 2020 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting December 22, 2020 - Tuesday - No Meeting (Dark) BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS: August 4, 2020 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting August 18, 2020 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting September 1, 2020 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting September 15, 2020 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting September 16, 2020 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting October 6, 2020 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting October 20, 2020 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting November 5, 2020 - Thursday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting November 17, 2020 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting November 18, 2020 - Wednesday - 7:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting December 1, 2020 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting December 15, 2020 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting Page 11 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/27/2024 11 July 28, 2020City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final CITY OFFICES CLOSED FRIDAY-SUNDAY AND ON THE FOLLOWING DAYS: September 7, 2020 - Monday - Labor Day November 11, 2020 - Wednesday - Veteran's Day November 26, 2020 - Thursday - Thanksgiving Day Page 12 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 3/27/2024 12 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 20-0458 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Closed Session of July 28, 2020 MINUTES:Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on July 14, 2020. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™13 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 20-0482 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Closed Session of July 28, 2020 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Initiation of Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Number of cases: One City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™14 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 20-0459 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of June 28, 2020 COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™15 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 20-0460 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 COVID-19 UPDATE City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™16 Page 1 of 2 JULY 28, 2020 CITY MANAGER COVID-19 UPDATE Please note that statement delivered during Council Meeting may vary due to frequent changes in COVID-19 information and restrictions. The total number of COVID-19 diagnoses continues to rise at an alarming rate in Hermosa Beach and across Los Angeles County. We have more than 140 total confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Hermosa Beach since the pandemic began – and the highest rate of confirmed cases per 100,000 population among the Beach Cities. It is important that we all continue to take responsibility for keeping our community safe by doing everything we can to slow the spread of COVID-19. This is essential not only to our personal health – but also to the health of our economy. The City has been working closely with the business community to safely re -open their operations. We moved quickly to issue an Emergency Executive Order on July 17 that is helping local businesses operate safely under new State and L.A. County Public Health Orders. Those orders restricted indoor operations at fitness centers and gyms and at personal service businesses, including hair and nail salons. Under the Executive Order, the City established and expanded existing permit programs so that these businesses could operate outdoors. Several local businesses have been able to shift their operations outdoors as a result, including SoHo Yoga, which is offering classes on the beach and in a parking lot. City staff is continuing to work with other businesses to help them establish safe outdoor operations. The Council will be asked to ratify this order later in this meeting. As you may know, the City had already established a permit program for restaurants and retail to expand their outdoor operations in response to earlier Public Health Orders restricting their indoor operations. Our City’s Development Department has issued 40 permits to expand outdoor dining and retail in Hermosa Beach. We have been pleased to see the opening of dining decks outside several of our local restaurants and to hear the many positive comments from the community about the expansion of outdoor dining in our City. To help our local businesses, we have also waived encroachment fees, and we are not charging them for the lost parking revenues when they expand into metered parking spaces. Keeping our local businesses operating safely and in compliance with these Public Health Orders is critical to the health of our community and our economy, and the City is committed to working with Hermosa’s business owners. 17 Page 2 of 2 The City is also working with the community to reduce the spread of COVID -19. As you will hear from the Hermosa Beach Police Chief Paul LeBaron later this evening, we saw more compliance with Public Health Orders in public spaces this past weekend. The Chief and City Staff are continuing to work with members of the community to prevent large gatherings on the beach and in the parks in violation of the Public Health Orders. We will continue to work with all the members of our community to keep all of us safe and to continue to safely re-open our local economy. We thank everyone for their understanding and cooperation during these challenging and historic times. 18 From: tony higgins <tony.higgins123@gmail.com>Date: July 23, 2020 at 8:37:49 AM PDTTo: Suja Lowenthal <suja@hermosabeach.gov>, Mayor Campbell <mcampbell@hermosabeach.gov>, Kelly Orta <korta@hermosabeach.gov>, Ken Robertson <krobertson@hermosabeach.gov>Cc: City Council <citycouncil@hermosabeach.gov>, Parks Commission <dg_parksreccommission@hermosabch.org>, Planning Commission<DG_PlanningCommission@hermosabch.org> Subject: Blatant disregard of mask laws and prohibitions of group gatherings at parks, on our beaches and other public spaces Ms. Lowenthal, Mayor Campbell, You have obviously thrown in the towel and thrown Covid vulnerable population under the bus. Let me remind you the Hermosa website says: Reminder – L.A. County Public Health Order Prohibits Group Sports: While many outdoor recreational activities are permitted, the L.A. County Public Health Order continues to prohibit group sports – including softball, football, volleyball and basketball – because they involve shared equipment or physical contact, which could cause the spread of COVID-19. The city is blatantly ignoring this at our parks and beaches - you have done NOTHING about this. It’s blatant negligence. You have given up on the multi-pronged strategy of masks & distancing, testing, tracing, screening and of not allowing group gatherings at parks or beaches that all experts agree on, and in so doing you have insured that your continued ill advised efforts to draw more people more people downtown will have the maximum negative effect on vulnerable populations. Healthy Hermosa is only a slogan when it convenient, popular and consistent with your pet projects. It’s a lie! You know damn well that we shouldn’t have taken steps to draw more people downtown until a high degree of mask and distancing compliance had been achieved at all beaches, parks, the strand, on our streets and construction sites. It’s not about health and safety, for you it’s about NOT doing anything to upset the spoiled brats who aren’t wearing masks and refuse to follow common sense Covid safety guidelines like No Group activities at valley park. The council and our city manager have shown their true colors. They are one and the same with the spoiled brats that have refused to uphold the obvious social contract to do everything we can to protect vulnerable populations if we to open more of the economy. For God’s Sake how can you ignore massive Covid community spread in LA county and Hermosa Beach and the utter failure of the city and its residents to implement Covid safety. You are going to reward that behavior by opening restaurants and keeping open parks and beaches? It’s insane and disgustingly incompetent. The strategy Hermosa beach has adopted us exactly what Donald Trump ordered up - thank you very much. Trump didn’t want a successful implementation of mask and distancing to get in the way of opening the economy and you bumbled your way into that Trump didn’t want a successful implementation Covid antigen testing program of so called essential workers like gardeners, construction workers, liquor store workers, or employees of restaurants to get in the way of opening the economy and you gave him that one too. 19 And in refusing to ensure we are getting regularly scheduled Covid antigen tests (e.g. twice weekly testing) at restaurants and so-called essential businesses you have pretty much guaranteed that asymptomatic carriers will become spreaders and super spreaders and they will continue to spread the virus for weeks undetected. How do you justIfy that AND do you contact-trace that???? AND how do you effectively contact trace when you don’t get test results for 2-3 weeks or not at all? Use your head! It can’t be done!!! You have let Covid into our community and it’s now spreading like wildfire. The latest estimates say the actual rate of infection is 24 times higher than the positive test results. It’s disgusting but it clearly shows you and nearly everyone between ages 12-45 don’t give a damn about protecting vulnerable populations. All you all care about is your own personal pleasure and popularity and the pleasure of your peers no matter the loss of life, the amount permanent serious injury and the amount of suffering it causes. And nothing will change when that defines the council and city leadership values and actions to date. And while you continue to designate gardeners, kitchen remodels and all manner of truely non critical construction an ESSENTIAL; you have closed city hall and council meetings to in person public comment where someone can look you in the eyes and challenge your dangerous irresponsible actions. Valley Park has never been busier with the number unmasked group activities. You haven’t done a damn thing. I called the police dispatch yesterday after seeing 5 large groups including soccer drills, soccer matches, lacrosses drills and personnel fitness exercises without masks or distancing and not a damn thing was done. To be fair I didn’t call police dispatch until 6:40pm but the exact same thing went on yesterday and the day before and the day before that!!! I have reported it and provided many photos and emails documenting this over the past couple of months. You just don’t give a damn. You know damn well you should close these venues if you are not going to enforce Covid safety. Anthony Higgins Here are the pictures from yesterday at valley park 20 21 22 Start: July 28, 2020 Dear council and city manager. Re: executive order 2020-09 Please! What are you thinking??., You haven’t got a handle on masks or distancing. compliance. You haven’t got a handle on twice weekly Covid antigen testing with quick <24 hour test turn around meaning you can’t contact trace. You haven’t got a handle on the prohibition of group activities at beaches and parks. Group activities at parks and beaches are prohibited but they are ok on our sidewalks!!!??? How do you rationalize that. Getting your nails done or the latest hair-do is not a justification to put health care workers and vulnerable populations at risk. Put first things first. If for instance a hair stylist is asymptomatic how will you ever know she is a super spreaders until the damage is already done. It’s reckless to attract more visitors downtown under these conditions especially when we are right in the middle of a widespread surge in covid infections!!!!!!! You are throwing the health care workers who have to pick up the pieces and already under tremendous pressure physical and emotional pressure right under the bus. Bang your pots and pans to that!!! Celebrate health care workers by burying them in new infections. And because you haven’t finished the job of masks and distancing compliance, antigen testing, screening nor have you established a foundation for effective contact tracing; not only are you throwing health care workers under the bus but you are throwing vulnerable persons under that same bus. Nor has the city stopped group activities at beaches and parks. The environment is already unsafe for vulnerable populations and in the 6 months you have had to address these things you haven’t got it done; and until you do you have no business opening anything. It’s simply outrageous and totally irresponsible that you are reopening these businesses and bringing more people into the downtown area without attending to these matters first. What the hell are you thinking? Just kill em off and pretend it’s all ok? I’m sorry but someone getting their nails done is not a justification to put people into an unsafe uncontrolled downtown environment. Our city’s Covid response is in complete disarray!!! It’s simply not safe to bring more people downtown before these shortcomings have been fully handled. Anthony Higgins 23 24 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 20-0468 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 INTRODUCTION OF FIRE STATION 100 B SHIFT CREW City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™25 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 20-0461 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 UPDATE FROM CITY DELEGATE TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY WEST VECTOR & VECTOR BORNE DISEASE CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™26 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report 20-0487 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the written communication. Attachments: Email from Ken Hartley dated July 21, 2020 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™27 From:tony higgins To:Eduardo Sarmiento Cc:City Council Subject:Fwd: It’s Outrageous and Unconscionable Date:Saturday, July 18, 2020 9:17:38 AM Please include this as a written communication for the next council meeting July 18,2020 Dear Ms Lowenthal, Dear Mayor Campbell Subject: It’s Outrageous and Unconscionable! I am responding to the story in the Beach Reporter that indicates there is strong support in the council for restricting traffic lanes to make more space for pedestrians and outdoor dining on Pier and Hermosa Ave to draw in more people into the downtown business district It’s outrageous and unconscionable that the city would be considering drawing more people into the downtown business district by closing traffic lanes on Pier and Hermosa Avenue before It has safeguarded the community by getting mask and distancing compliance up to the 80% threshold. We are currently running at about 10% compliance for pedestrians. It’s outrageous and unconscionable that the city would be considering drawing more people into the downtown business district before the city has ensured that twice weekly Covid antigen tests AND daily temperature screening at all restaurants and construction sites are being done. It’s outrageous and unconscionable that the city would be considering drawing more people into the downtown business district before the city has funded an independent audit of the contact tracing process to insure the necessary records are accurate and available on a timely basis when they inevitably are needed. It’s outrageous and unconscionable that you would be considering this action when nearly every expert is saying now is the time to clamp down on the Covid virus and that no reopening will succeed without first implementing common sense steps to contain the virus. And your plan is to draw more people into the downtown business district? 28 It’s outrageous and unconscionable and might I add horribly incompetent. Anthony Higgins Note: I have copied Supervisor Hahn’s office on this email in the hopes that she might intercede on behalf of our residents and vulnerable populations and in the Interest of taking common sense to contain the virus before expanding the economy. 29 1 July 21, 2020 Hermosa Beach City Council City of Hermosa Beach Dear City Council, This letter is to call your attention to what appear to be substantial violations of the Ralph M. Brown Act that jeopardize the finality of the action taken by the Hermosa Beach City Council on June 23, 2020. The hearing, text amendment TA-19.1 “CONSIDERATION OF TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE M-1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONE INCLUDING A LIMITED EVENT PERMIT FOR CYPRESS DISTRICT BUSINESSES” began on February 25, 2020 and concluded with a vote to pass an amendment to the M-1 Light Industrial Zone on June 23, 2020. The public was deprived of key information that was necessary for it to properly and fully-participate in deliberation of the project. The public was deprived of the right to publicly participate before decision-making. The most blatant and extreme violation of the Brown Act was Mayor Campbell using her public position to circumvent transparency for her personal financial enrichment. The Mayor failed to disclose her substantial financial interest in the project, improperly participated and voted, provided misleading statements as to her recusal, and failed to provide the opportunity for public comment. Background At the meeting on February 25, 2020, the Hermosa Beach City Council public hearing listed item 5(a): “CONSIDERATION OF TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE M- 1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONE INCLUDING A LIMITED EVENT PERMIT FOR CYPRESS DISTRICT BUSINESSES”. This item was initiated by the Mayor Pro Tem Massey at the request of the Mayor’s husband Michael Collins during public comment. Mayor Campbell and her husband Michael Collins own an art gallery business named Shockboxx Gallery in the Cypress District. Shockboxx Gallery is in the business of selling retail art and renting the space for events. Shockboxx Gallery has been operating illegally without proper zoning, permits, or approvals. City Council and City Staff tacitly approved of this illegal business, actively patronized it, and refused to take any corrective action against it until the issue was made public. The zoning code does not allow for retail sales or assembly uses in the M-1 zone., and Shockboxx Gallery would be required to close unless the City amended the 30 2 zoning code. This is the source of the City’s Council’s proposal for allowing “limited event permit” zoning text amendment would give the gallery the opportunity to hold 72 events over a two-year period. With the existing 12-event permit process already in place, this would now allow the art gallery to have events every weekend. Apart from a business owned in-part by a sitting City Council member, it is difficult to imagine any business in any district that would enjoy similar accommodation or such preferential treatment. As the initial hearing began on February 25th, the City Attorney initiated a discussion regarding a request that the City Council discuss and vote to postpone the hearing to another date. Mr. Jenkins wished to obtain a letter from the Federal Political Practices Commission to determine if Councilmember Massey could participate in the hearing due to his personal residence within 500ft of the project. Apparently, Mr. Jenkins either found out just before the hearing that Mayor Pro Tem Massey intended to not recuse himself or he was planning on allowing Councilmember Massey to participate regardless of the FPPC requirement and was caught off guard by a last minute written communication reminding Mr. Jenkins of this requirement. At Mr. Jenkins request, Mayor Campbell and the Council opened the item, quickly discussed and then voted to continue the hearing. Councilmember Massey made the motion, it was seconded and vote was taken to postpone the hearing. The public was not allowed to comment before the vote was taken. At the continuance of the hearing on June 23, 2020, the Hermosa Beach City Council reopening the item “CONSIDERATION OF TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE M-1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONE INCLUDING A LIMITED EVENT PERMIT FOR CYPRESS DISTRICT BUSINESSES.” With Mayor Pro Tem Massey now having a determination letter from the FPPC that seems to allow his participation in the hearing, Mayor Campbell now recused herself and said: “I would like to announce that I continue to be recused on this item based on the proximity of my home to the area under discussion.” The Mayor’s recusal meant that the Mayor Pro Tem would act as the Mayor for this hearing. During the hearing, after the staff report and public comment, another Councilmember stated his concerns about the Mayor’s disclosure: “I have concerns about the Mayor recusing herself today and mentioning the reason she is recusing herself is because of the proximity of the property to her residence and not the fact that she and her husband own a project in that district, that concerns me cause it’s not transparent. And it’s also my understanding that that business is not listed in the Mayors Form 700 disclosure”. The same Councilmember also expressed concern regarding the Mayor Pro Tem’s participation in the matter prior to his obtaining an FPPC determination and the motivation behind the unusual efforts to participate. 31 3 “Justin you also know that you recused yourself on two litigation matters specifically because these pertained to a property in the Cypress district but for inexplicable reasons you decided to postpone this meeting for about four months just so you can get a waiver from the FPPC so you can participate, which gives the perception that you are basically trying to do this just so you can back-up the Mayor and support her business…. you took action to support the Mayor and her business because the Mayor’s business happens to be in the district, that’s my position, you can disagree with it, but I think that is the only reason you make the exception in this case.” Having been notified of the obvious disclosure omission before public participation, the Mayor Pro Tem continued on without re-opening public comment given this new and important information. Ultimately a vote was taken to pass the text amendment allowing the special dispensation for the Mayor’s husband’s business. Violations First, given the fact that Mayor Campbell owned a business in the zone that the text amendment would most benefit, she should have properly disclosed her financial interest and recused herself before the hearing even began at both hearings. In accordance with government code 87105, Mayor Campbell had a duty to publicly disclose her financial interest in detail sufficient for the public to understand, recused herself from the matter and leave the room. The public was intentionally deprived of this information, which certainly was an important consideration in the creation of the text amendment. There are new regulations that bear directly on this situation (2 Cal. Code Regs. Section 18707), and it appears Mayor Campbell’s failure to properly disclose the reasons for her recusal are in direct violation of them. Additionally, Brown Act section 54949 states each member of a legislative body who attends a meeting of that where action is taken in violation of any provision of this chapter, and where the member intends to deprive the public of information to which the member knows or has reason to know the public is entitled under this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor. Clearly, at a minimum Mayor Campbell certainly knew the public was entitled to know about her financial interest in the project and intentionally deprived the public of that information. Perhaps the City Prosecutor or District Attorney’s Public Integrity Unit can decide whether this is something worth pursuing. Second, the Mayor improperly participated in the portions of the hearing on 2.25.2020. Instead of leaving, Mayor Campbell led the hearing and voted to support Mayor Pro Tem’s motion to continue the hearing so he could obtain a determination letter from the FPPC. 32 4 Third, Mayor Pro Tem on portions of the hearing on 2.25.2020 did not allow the public to comment as part of public participation. Fourth, at the 2.25.2020 hearing Councilmember Massey whom also was required to disclose his financial interest and recuse himself, instead made no such disclosures, participated in the hearing and actually made the motion to stop the very hearing that he should not have been part of so he could have time to craft a letter to the FPPC in an effort to later allow him to participate. Fifth, at the 6.23.2020 portion of the hearing, Mary Campbell once again failed to properly disclose her financial interest in Shockboxx Gallery. Instead, she chose to mislead the public by stating she had previously recused on the previous hearing when in fact she did not, participated, and voted. Additionally, rather than disclose her financial interest in the business this text amendment was designed to help, the Mayor recused due to her personal residence’s proximity to the project. Finally, at the June 23, 2020 hearing when key information regarding Mayor Campbell’s undisclosed financial interest was disclosed by Councilmember Fangary after public comment, Mayor Pro Tem Massey failed to re-open public comment given this new information. The City Council deprived the public of critical information that could have impacted this legislative action. Had Mayor Campbell properly and fully disclosed her financial interest in a business that would directly financially benefit her and her husband, the public may have had something to say about this self-serving process. The public was not aware of the Mayor’s financial interest is also supported by the fact that the Mayor omitted her financial interest in Shockboxx Gallery as required by the FPPC in Form 700. As you know, the very reason the FPPC requires financial disclosures in its Form 700 requirements is that “it provides transparency and ensures accountability in two ways: It provides necessary information to the public about an official's personal financial interests to ensure that officials are making decisions in the best interest of the public and not enhancing their personal finances.” Unfortunately, not only did Mayor Campbell not adequately disclose, she actively participated in guiding the hearing to directly benefit her. She both participated, as Mayor allowed a Councilmember who should have recused to participate and make motions, as well as voted on the item. Given the fact that Councilmember Massey was the councilmember that requested for the item to be agendized, Mayor Campbell understood that his participation in supporting the text amendment was to her financial benefit. This is a brazen example of a City official using her public office for personal enrichment. 33 5 As you are aware, the Brown Act creates specific agenda obligations related to an item to be discussed or acted upon, and also creates a legal remedy for illegally taken actions—namely, the judicial invalidation of them upon proper findings of fact and conclusions of law. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54960.1, I demand that the Hermosa Beach City Council cure and correct the illegally taken action as follows: (1) Hold a properly noticed hearing and require Mayor Campbell adequately disclose her financial interest in Shockboxx Gallery and allow the public an opportunity to comment of which it was deprived. (2) Provide a formal and explicit withdrawal from any commitment made, coupled with a disclosure at a subsequent meeting of why individual members of the legislative body took the positions — by vote or otherwise — that they did, accompanied by the full opportunity for informed comment by members of the public at the same meeting, notice of which is properly included on the posted agenda. Informed comment might in certain circumstances include the provision of any and all documents in the possession of the local agency related to the action taken, with copies available to the public on request at the offices of the agency and also at the meeting at which reconsideration of the matter is to occur. As provided by Section 54960.1, you have 30 days from the receipt of this demand to either cure or correct the challenged action or inform me of your decision not to do so. If you fail to cure or correct as demanded, such inaction may leave me no recourse but to seek a judicial invalidation of the challenged action pursuant to Section 54960.1, in which case I would also ask the court to order you to pay my court costs and reasonable attorney fees in this matter, pursuant to Section 54960.5. Respectfully yours, Ken Hartley 723 30th Street 34 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0466 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following minutes: 1.March 16, 2020 Regular Meeting 2.July 14, 2020 Adjourned Regular Meeting Due to staffing shortages in the City Clerk’s office, the following minutes will be provided as soon as they become available. 1.April 14, 2020 Regular Meeting 2.April 22, 2020 Adjourned Regular Meeting (FY 20-21 CIP Study Session) 3.April 28, 2020 Regular Meeting 4.April 30, 2020 Adjourned Regular Meeting (COVID-19 Town Hall) 5.May 12, 2020 Regular Meeting 6.May 21, 2020 Special Meeting 7.May 26, 2020 Special Meeting 8.June 1, 2020 Emergency Closed Session Meeting 9.June 3, 2020 City Council Virtual Study Session (Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget) 10.June 9, 2020 Regular Meeting 11.June 23, 2020 Special Meeting Respectfully Submitted by: Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™35 Hermosa Beach City Council Special Meeting Minutes Tuesday, March 16, 2020 Regular Session 5:00 P.M. Virtual Meeting via Zoom City Council Mary Campbell, Mayor Justin Massey, Mayor Pro Tem Stacy Armato, Councilmember Michael Detoy, Councilmember Hany Fangary, Councilmember CALL TO ORDER The City Council Special Meeting of the City of Hermosa Beach met at council City Hall Council Chambers 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Campbell at 5 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers Armato, Detoy, Fangary, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was led by Mayor Campbell CLOSED SESSION REPORT No closed session report provided due to cancellation of closed session. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Campbell shared that due to blown out transformer City Hall has lost all power and will be conducting the meeting differently while California Edison makes the necessary repairs. Interim Emergency Preparedness Professional Michael Edwards shared information 36 provided by the Los Angeles County Public Health in conjunction with the State of California regarding the COVID-19 situation. (Complete audio and video is available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed clicking the following link: Special City Council Meeting March 16, 2020) APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Armato moved to approve the agenda, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Massey. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Detoy, Fangary, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS NONE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The following people provided public comment: 1. Mike Grannis 2. Laura Pena 3. John David 4.Seth Wise 5. Chef Melba 6. Cathy Nole 7. Karen Lions Interim Emergency Preparedness Professional Michael Edwards provided a point of clarification that the State and County Orders go into effect immediately and are enforceable by law. Restaurants that are licensed and have a takeout model can continue for takeout only. (Complete audio and video is available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed clicking the following link: Special City Council Meeting March 16, 2020) 1. CITY COUNCIL DECLARATION OF AN EMERGENCY WITH ATTENDANT ORDERS City Council conducted a thoughtful and robust discussion regarding the proposed Resolution. The Council discussed the proposed Resolution paragraph by paragraph to ensure clarity and transparency with any additions or changes to the Resolution. (Complete audio and video is available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed clicking the following link: Special City Council Meeting March 16, 2020) 37 MOTION: Councilmember Armato moved to approve and adopt the resolution with the changes identified, seconded by Councilmember Detoy. Motion carried by unanimous consent AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Detoy, Fangary, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell ADJOURNMENT Mayor Campbell adjourned the Special City Council meeting at an undisclosed time. Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk 38 Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Tuesday, July 14, 2020 Closed Session 6:00 P.M. Regular Session 7:00 P.M. Virtual Meeting via Zoom City Council Mary Campbell, Mayor Justin Massey, Mayor Pro Tem Stacy Armato, Councilmember Michael Detoy, Councilmember Hany Fangary, Councilmember CALL TO ORDER The City Council Regular Meeting of the City of Hermosa Beach met via a virtual meeting held pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom March 17, 2020 on the above date. Meeting was called to order by Mayor Campbell at 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers Armato, Detoy, Fangary, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was led Mayor Campbell CLOSED SESSION REPORT City Attorney Michael Jenkins provided a report from closed session. He shared that Closed session was called to order at 5 p.m. and no public comments were provided. He reported that not items were added to the closed session and there was no reportable action. 39 ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Campbell shared some announcements (Complete audio and video is available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link . July 14, 2020 City Council Meeting) APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Detoy moved to approve the agenda, seconded by Councilmember Armato. Motion carried by majority consent. Councilmember Fangary stated that he will not be supporting the motion due to his disapproval of staff providing verbal staff reports. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell NOES: Councilmember Fangary PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS Jacqueline Sun and Tom Bakaly with Beach Cities Health District provided a COVID-19 presentation and update. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Lowenthal shared that the audio-visual project has started and is expected to be completed by the end of August. She then invited Hermosa’s Fire Station 100 to introduce themselves to the City Council and community.(Complete audio and video is available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: July 14, 2020 City Council Meeting) PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS The following people provided public comment: 1. Andrew Vogele 2. Mike (No last name provided) 3. Marie Jackson 1. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Written communication was provided from Liz Mahoney and Tony Higgins MOTION: Councilmember Armato moved to receive and file written communications, seconded by Councilmember Detoy. Motion carried by unanimous consent. 40 AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Detoy, Fangary, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell Mayor Pro Tem Massey addressed some of the concerns expressed during public comment by requesting clarification from City Attorney Michael Jenkins. (Complete audio and video is available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: July 14, 2020 City Council Meeting) 2. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Councilmember Detoy moved to approve the consent calendar, seconded by Councilmember Armato. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Detoy, Fangary, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell 3. CONSENT ORDINANCE Prior to opening agenda item 3(a) Mayor Campbell recused herself from participation due to conflict of interest. a. ORDINANCE 20-1412: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TA 19-1 TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS FOR NEW LIMITED EVENTS ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT, ADDING DEFINITIONS FOR ARTIST STUDIO AND ARCHITECT STUDIO AND ADDING ARCHITECT STUDIO AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE M-1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONE AND DEERMINING THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT MOTION: Councilmember Armato motioned to approve and adopt Ordinance 20 -1412 by title only and waive the full reading, seconded by councilmem ber Detoy. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Council Member Armato, Detoy, Fangary, and Mayor Pro Tem Massey NOES: None RECUSED: Mayor Campbell City Clerk Eduardo Sarmiento read the title of Ordinance 20-1412 for the record. 4. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION NONE 41 5. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS a. PUBLIC HEARING TO REVIEW DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE COLLECTION (REFUSE) CHARGES FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLACING SAID CHARGES ON THE PROPERTY TAX ROLLS AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. THE ASSESSMENT WOULD AFFECT ONLY THOSE PROPERTIES WITH REFUSE BILLS DELINQUENT AS OF MARCH 31, 2020 MOTION: Councilmember Armato moved to approve staff recommendation to place said charges on the property tax rolls as a special assessment, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Massey. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Detoy, Fangary, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell NOES: None 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS a. RECEIVE REPORT ON EMERGENCY ENFORCEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE RESTAURANTS AND ALCOHOL SERVING ESTABLISHMENTS COMPLY WITH L.A. COUNTY PHYSICAL DISTANCING AND SAFETY ORDERS AS THEY CONTINUE TO REOPEN (Verbal report, no vote required) Report provided by Police Chief Paul LeBaron and Community Development Director Ken Robertson. (Complete audio and video is available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: July 14, 2020 City Council Meeting) b. MAYOR’S PLEDGE TOWARDS MY BROTHER’S KEEPER INITIATIVE MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Massey moved to approve staff recommendation, seconded by Mayor Campbell. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Council Member Armato, Detoy, Fangary, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell NOES: None c. MODIFICATION OF URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 20-1410U OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO CLARIFY THAT THE PERIOD ALLOWED FOR TEMPORARY OUTDOOR DINING/SEATING AND OUTDOOR RETAIL WILL CONTINUE UNTIL REVOKED BY CITY COUNCIL Public comment was provided by: 1. Dency Nelson 42 (Complete audio and video is available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: July 14, 2020 City Council Meeting) MOTION: Councilmember Detoy moved to approve staff recommendation and add a verbal assurance from the City Council to keep the Urgency Ordinance in place until January 13, 2021, seconded by Councilmember Armato. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Council Member Armato, Detoy, Fangary, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell NOES: None d. CONSIDERATION OF TEMPORARY OPTIONS TO FACILITATE FOOT TRAFFIC AND OUTDOOR DINNING OPTIONS WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT- OF-WAY ALONG HERMOSA BEACH BUSINESS CORRIDORS Public comment was provided by: 1. Kathleen Nole 2. Dave Davis 3. Laura Pena 4. John David (Complete audio and video is available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: July 14, 2020 City Council Meeting) MOTION: Councilmember Armato made the following multipart motion, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Massey. Motion carried by unanimous consent. Retain a traffic engineer to design for single lane closers in both directions on Hermosa Ave., and Pier Ave between Hermosa Ave and Valley to facilitate outdoor dining, outdoor retail, personal services, foot traffic, and diagonal parking with a bike lane buffer. City Manager to act under her emergency jurisdiction to work with Economic Development Committee to develop a plan and execute the details laid out in the traffic study design. The item will be brought back to Council for consideration if a need outside the City Manager authority is required. Reach out to local businesses along Hermosa Ave., or any viable locations in Hermosa Beach that would be amendable to this kind of single lane closer and reconfiguration of the streets, and or, areas public or private available for reconfiguration. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Detoy, Fangary, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell. NOES: None e. REVIEW OF CITY’S PARKING ASSET CLOSURES AND RESTRICTIONS IN LIGHT OF ONGOING CHANGES TO THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY HEALTH 43 ORDER Public comment was provided by: 1. Andrew Lapointe MOTION: Councilmember Armato motioned to open parking lot C for employee parking only and discontinue employee parking in both parking lots A and D, seconded my Mayor Campbell. Motion carried by majority consent. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Fangary, and Mayor Campbell NOES: Councilmember Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Massey f. CITY MANAGER CONTRACT AMENDMENT Public comment was provided by: 1. Johnathan Wicks (Complete audio and video is available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: July 14, 2020 City Council Meeting) MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Massey moved to approve staff recommendation, seconded by Councilmember Armato. Motion carried by majority consent. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell NOES: Councilmember Fangary RECUSED: Councilmember Detoy VOTE TO EXTEND COUNCIL MEETING TO MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Massey moved to extend the City Council meeting to 12:15 a.m., seconded by Councilmember Armato. Motion carried by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmembers Armato, Detoy, Fangary, Mayor Pro Tem Massey, and Mayor Campbell 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. VACANCIES – BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – EXPIRATION OF TERMS PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS City Council held interviews for three Planning Commission seats. A total of seven applicants were interviewed. Each City Councilmember selected their top three 44 candidates. Stephan Izant, Dave Pederson, and Marie Rice were unanimously selected by the City Council. The following are the selections each Councilmember provided: Councilmember Armato: Stephan Izant, Dave Pederson, and Marie Rice Councilmember Detoy: Stephan Izant, Dave Pederson, and Marie Rice Councilmember Fangary: Stephan Izant, Dave Pederson, and Marie Rice Mayor Pro Tem Massey: Stephan Izant, Dave Pederson, and Marie Rice Mayor Campbell: Stephan Izant, Dave Pederson, and Marie Rice b. UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES Updates given by: Mayor Campbell and Councilmember Detoy. (Complete audio and video is available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking on the following link: July 14, 2020 City Council Meeting) 8. OTHER MATTERS – CITY COUNCIL The City Council discussed the option of holding two Council Meetings in the month of August instead of one which has been the custom in the past. (Complete audio and video is available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking on the following link: July 14, 2020 City Council Meeting) MOTION: Councilmember Fangary moved to have two City Council meetings in the month of August, seconded by Councilmember Armato. Motion carried by majority consent. AYES: Armato, Detoy, Fangary, and Mayor Campbell NOES: Mayor Pro Tem Massey a. TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS NONE (Complete audio and video is available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking on the following link: July 14, 2020 City Council Meeting) 45 ADJOURNMENT Mayor Campbell adjourned the City Council meeting in memory of Danay DiVirgilio to Tuesday July 28, 2020 at 4:30 p.m. Meeting concluded at 12:00 a.m. Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk 46 From:Kent Allen To:Eduardo Sarmiento Subject:Fwd: Council agenda for Tuesday July 28th meeting Date:Monday, July 27, 2020 2:57:04 PM Please add this to the agenda comment from me, Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I don't see it added to the agenda. Hi Eddie/Suja Please post this comment on the upcoming agenda: The city council agenda has historically been made available to the public at the end of the day on the Thursday before the Tuesday meeting. It is now 12:00 noon and there is no agenda on the city website. Unfortunately, this has become very common in the last several months and any normal person could assume that there is a calculated effort to keep the agenda from the residents for as long as possible. What gives? Are you being instructed to not put the agenda up until the 72-hour legal requirement to do so? The legal requirement is a minimum requirement and should not be used as a tool to keep information from the public. When will the agenda be posted? Suja: Can you get back to the traditional Thursday night posting and commit to doing that moving forward? If so I will give you a bid HIGH-5 if you can make this happen. Please let me know you received this email. Sincerely. Kent Allen 310-864-9124 -- Kent Allen 47 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0453 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 CHECK REGISTERS (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the following check registers. Attachments: 1.Check Register 7/2/2020 2.Check Register 7/13/2020 Respectfully Submitted by: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™48 07/02/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 5:45:03PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 95014 7/2/2020 ACCELA INC INV-ACC52266 UPGRADE/PROGRESS PMTS 14 & 1505817 715-4201-4201 16,709.33 Total : 16,709.3305817 95015 7/2/2020 AQUA FLO SI1524091 to 49861 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/MAY20-JUN2009366 001-6101-4309 2,102.41 Total : 2,102.4109366 95016 7/2/2020 ATHENS SERVICES 8504047 CITYWIDE PORTER SERVICES/MAY2016660 001-3301-4201 10,581.08 001-3104-4201 15,877.58 001-6101-4201 1,554.59 001-3304-4201 1,457.95 CITYWIDE STEAM CLEANING/MAY208504047A 001-3301-4201 5,746.73 001-3304-4201 160.53 001-3104-4201 570.98 CITYWIDE STEAM CLEANING/MAY208504047B 001-3301-4201 6,117.96 001-3104-4201 477.97 001-3304-4201 764.74 CITYWIDE PORTER SERVICES/MAY208504047C 001-3301-4201 2,675.48 PD SHREDDING/JUN208549089 001-2101-4309 44.44 Total : 46,030.0316660 95017 7/2/2020 BEACH GIRL PROPERTIES LLC 253 PARKING METERS - 70 14TH STREET/APR2016371 001-3842 650.00 Total : 650.0016371 95018 7/2/2020 COAR, CELESTE Receipt 2001727.003 CANCELLED EXCURSION 8883 REFUND10614 001-2111 50.00 Total : 50.0010614 95019 7/2/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 451864 FINGERPRINTING/MAY2000364 001-1203-4251 32.00 2b (1)49 07/02/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 5:45:03PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 32.00 95019 7/2/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE00364 95020 7/2/2020 EFRAM MOBIL 008197 VEHICLES/FUEL/FEB20-JUN2001400 715-2101-4310 269.67 Total : 269.6701400 95021 7/2/2020 GRAINGER 9553550303 MAT REQ 309687/SAW BLADE10836 715-4206-4309 54.09 Total : 54.0910836 95022 7/2/2020 JLEE ENGINEERING, INC.3914 PLAN CHECK SRVCS/FEB2021644 001-4101-4201 700.00 Total : 700.0021644 95023 7/2/2020 LAURA MECOY COMMUNICATIONS LLC 5-2020 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER/MAY2020347 001-1201-4201 6,000.00 Total : 6,000.0020347 95024 7/2/2020 LEARNED LUMBER B704153 to B706957 STRAW HATS/METAL SCOOP/APR20-MAY2000167 001-3104-4309 43.75 001-6101-4309 10.90 Total : 54.6500167 95025 7/2/2020 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO.40853815 MAT REQ 309691/DRAINAGE MAT00728 715-3104-4311 55.46 Total : 55.4600728 95026 7/2/2020 MID-CITY MAILING SERVICES CORP 24731 SEWER LEVY NOTICE MAILING SRVCS16541 160-3102-4201 4,274.02 Total : 4,274.0216541 95027 7/2/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 504841753001 MAT REQ 987268/TONER/PEN CUPS13114 001-4601-4305 98.87 MAT REQ 987269/PRINTER INK FOR LISA505097347001 001-4601-4305 62.26 MAT REQ 874054/DVD-R (100)508471932001 001-1208-4305 54.73 MAT REQ 874054/DVD CASES/DUSTERS508472335001 001-1208-4305 84.02 50 07/02/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 5:45:03PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 299.88 95027 7/2/2020 OFFICE DEPOT13114 95028 7/2/2020 PH&S PRODUCTS LLC 0013307-IN PD/CSO/NITRILE EXAM GLOVES17130 001-3302-4309 529.20 001-2101-4306 310.80 Total : 840.0017130 95029 7/2/2020 PITNEY BOWES INC 3103984807 POSTAGE METER RENTAL 3/30-6/29/2013838 715-1208-4201 644.19 Total : 644.1913838 95030 7/2/2020 RED SECURITY GROUP, LLC 3103984807 MAT REQ 309628/FOUR DUPLICATE KEYS13255 001-4204-4309 17.52 Total : 17.5213255 95031 7/2/2020 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, LLC 99858122-001 MAT REQ 668231/NOZZLES19829 001-6101-4309 248.23 Total : 248.2319829 95032 7/2/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BARRICADES 7298 BEACH BARRICADE RENTAL 3/27-4/2/2013544 001-3301-4201 2,071.25 BEACH BARRICADE RENTAL 4/27-5/26/207327 001-3301-4201 5,355.00 BEACH BARRICADE RENTAL 5/8-5/28/207330 001-3301-4201 806.25 BEACH BARRICADE RENTAL 5/12-5/28/207331 001-3301-4201 3,415.00 BEACH BARRICADE RENTAL 5/15-5/28/207332 001-3301-4201 440.00 Total : 12,087.5013544 95033 7/2/2020 SUPERIOR PAVEMENT MARKINGS INC 12617 STRAND YELLOW CENTER LINE REMOVAL09734 001-3104-4201 9,913.80 Total : 9,913.8009734 95034 7/2/2020 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 88667 MAT REQ 987151/CARRIAGE BOLTS01206 001-3104-4309 411.09 REQ 87149/STREET SIGN MAINT/JUN2088748 001-3104-4309 116.92 51 07/02/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 5:45:03PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 528.01 95034 7/2/2020 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC01206 Bank total : 101,560.79 21 Vouchers for bank code :boa 101,560.79Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 21 "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 4 inclusive, of the check register for 7/2/2020 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Finance Director Date 7/2/2020 52 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 95035 7/13/2020 ADAMS, DEANNA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21887 001-2111 1,110.00 Total : 1,110.0021887 95036 7/13/2020 AGUILAR PEREZ, SAMUEL PO 35142 KC EQUIP UNDERPAY RESITUTION21805 140-8687-4201 486.00 Total : 486.0021805 95037 7/13/2020 ALBRECHT, BETH Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21830 001-2111 1,665.00 Total : 1,665.0021830 95038 7/13/2020 ALNES, MICHAEL Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21864 001-2111 370.00 Total : 370.0021864 95039 7/13/2020 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS PO 35082 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE REFUND20783 001-3840 53.01 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE REFUNDPO 35106 001-3840 1,244.04 Total : 1,297.0520783 95040 7/13/2020 ANTHEM, INC.PO 35107 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE REFUND21840 001-3840 1,190.96 Total : 1,190.9621840 95041 7/13/2020 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 3465.001-14R TRANSPACIFIC FIBER OPTIC EIR/MAY2008614 001-2108 860.00 Total : 860.0008614 95042 7/13/2020 AT&T 000014901474 PD COMPUTER CIRCUITS 5/13/20-6/12/2000321 001-2101-4304 137.89 Total : 137.8900321 95043 7/13/2020 BALL, THOMAS Receipt 2002105.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21890 001-2111 185.00 Total : 185.0021890 95044 7/13/2020 BARKER, CINDY Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21913 2b (2)53 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 95044 7/13/2020 (Continued)BARKER, CINDY21913 001-2111 370.00 Total : 370.0021913 95045 7/13/2020 BARNARD, JENNY Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21809 001-2111 1,365.00 Total : 1,365.0021809 95046 7/13/2020 BARNETT, JODI Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21811 001-2111 555.00 Total : 555.0021811 95047 7/13/2020 BARTON, WILLIAM PO 35090 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3501420921782 001-3302 10.00 Total : 10.0021782 95048 7/13/2020 BRACAMONTE, DANIELLE Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21862 001-2111 1,850.00 Total : 1,850.0021862 95049 7/13/2020 BRADLEY, ROBERT PO 35092 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3101909721781 001-3302 53.00 Total : 53.0021781 95050 7/13/2020 BREWER, ALANA Receipt 2002101.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21889 001-2111 185.00 Total : 185.0021889 95051 7/13/2020 BRIGGS-SINGH, MELISSA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21881 001-2111 185.00 Total : 185.0021881 95052 7/13/2020 BROWN, GEORGE Parcel 4184-011-003 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE18343 001-6871 74.47 105-3105 24.61 Total : 99.0818343 95053 7/13/2020 BURGESS, DAIDRE Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21825 001-2111 1,260.00 54 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 1,260.00 95053 7/13/2020 BURGESS, DAIDRE21825 95054 7/13/2020 CANON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC 4033092589 DETECTIVE COPIER/MAR20-JUN2010838 715-2101-4201 461.58 Total : 461.5810838 95055 7/13/2020 CASTELLANI, SHANNON Receipt 2001975.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21810 001-2111 185.00 Total : 185.0021810 95056 7/13/2020 CHRISMAN, JENN Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21873 001-2111 370.00 Total : 370.0021873 95057 7/13/2020 CI TECHNOLOGIES INC 2235 INTERNAL AFFAIRS SOFTWARE JUL20-JUN2116786 153-2106-4201 1,273.45 Total : 1,273.4516786 95058 7/13/2020 COE-JUELL, LINDY Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21895 001-2111 370.00 Total : 370.0021895 95059 7/13/2020 COLANTUONO, HIGHSMITH &42752 LEGAL SRVCS/UUT LAWSUIT/MAY2021871 705-1133-4201 303.35 Total : 303.3521871 95060 7/13/2020 COLLINS, STACEY Receipt 2002372.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND14469 001-2111 185.00 Total : 185.0014469 95061 7/13/2020 COMPLETES PLUS 01ZV0428 to 01AA9996 VEHICLE MAINT/REPAIR PARTS/JAN20-APR2009436 715-2101-4311 163.27 715-3104-4311 28.49 715-3302-4311 186.74 Total : 378.5009436 95062 7/13/2020 CONWAY, KRISTINE Receipt 2002076.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21905 001-2111 195.00 Total : 195.0021905 55 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 95063 7/13/2020 CRAWFORD, AMANDA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21857 001-2111 1,950.00 Total : 1,950.0021857 95064 7/13/2020 CROSBY, STEPHAN Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21855 001-2111 555.00 Total : 555.0021855 95065 7/13/2020 CRUDEN, ANDREA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21710 001-2111 780.00 Total : 780.0021710 95066 7/13/2020 CURRY, ELISABETH V Parcel 4182-022-004 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE20504 001-6871 124.12 105-3105 24.61 Total : 148.7320504 95067 7/13/2020 CURRY, SAMANTHA KATE PO 35093 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3800222221795 001-3302 38.00 Total : 38.0021795 95068 7/13/2020 DALEY, SALOMEH Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21901 001-2111 390.00 Total : 390.0021901 95069 7/13/2020 DE MORAES, PRISCILA Receipt 2001963.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21854 001-2111 195.00 Total : 195.0021854 95070 7/13/2020 DELCOURE, RICHARD HANS PO 35144 KC EQUIP UNDERPAY RESTITUTION21752 140-8687-4201 1,458.00 Total : 1,458.0021752 95071 7/13/2020 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC 58196/Mat Req 874171 RECRUIT ACADEMY TRAINING AMMUNITION12735 001-2101-4309 163.78 Total : 163.7812735 95072 7/13/2020 EELLS, AMY Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21824 001-2111 1,040.00 56 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 1,040.00 95072 7/13/2020 EELLS, AMY21824 95073 7/13/2020 ESKOWITZ, STEPHANY Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21826 001-2111 1,850.00 Total : 1,850.0021826 95074 7/13/2020 EVERETTE, BRADI Receipt 2002038.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21852 001-2111 185.00 Total : 185.0021852 95075 7/13/2020 FAMILY THEATRE INC Covid-19 Refund THEATRE PERMIT REFUNDS16932 001-2111 600.00 Total : 600.0016932 95076 7/13/2020 FANUCCHI-BOYAR, GIULIANA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21882 001-2111 370.00 Total : 370.0021882 95077 7/13/2020 FASOLA, BETH Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21909 001-2111 1,480.00 Total : 1,480.0021909 95078 7/13/2020 FIEL, CHRISTOPHER PO 35084 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE REFUND21842 001-3840 946.16 Total : 946.1621842 95079 7/13/2020 FLEISCHAUER, ERICA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21861 001-2111 780.00 Total : 780.0021861 95080 7/13/2020 FURGISON, MELISSA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21872 001-2111 370.00 Total : 370.0021872 95081 7/13/2020 GAROFALO-WRIGHT, LYNN Receipt 2002331.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21884 001-2111 185.00 Total : 185.0021884 95082 7/13/2020 GONZALEZ-REZNICHEK, MARIKA AND RUTH Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21894 001-2111 555.00 57 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 555.00 95082 7/13/2020 GONZALEZ-REZNICHEK, MARIKA AND RUTH21894 95083 7/13/2020 GUINEHEARD, SUMMER PO 35094 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3101864421802 001-3302 53.00 Total : 53.0021802 95084 7/13/2020 GURGOZE, FUNDA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21898 001-2111 390.00 Total : 390.0021898 95085 7/13/2020 HAIGHT, CHRISTINE Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21879 001-2111 520.00 Total : 520.0021879 95086 7/13/2020 HAMILL, MEGHAN Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21831 001-2111 1,300.00 Total : 1,300.0021831 95087 7/13/2020 HARMON, DENNIS PO 35085 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE REFUND11514 001-3840 109.36 Total : 109.3611514 95088 7/13/2020 HEBL, CHRISTEN Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21883 001-2111 555.00 Total : 555.0021883 95089 7/13/2020 HENSON, ANDREA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21820 001-2111 1,110.00 Total : 1,110.0021820 95090 7/13/2020 HERNANDEZ, RANDY Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21897 001-2111 740.00 Total : 740.0021897 95091 7/13/2020 HERRERA, ISABEL Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21904 001-2111 390.00 Total : 390.0021904 95092 7/13/2020 HIRSH, KATE Receipt 2002260.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21868 001-2111 185.00 58 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 185.00 95092 7/13/2020 HIRSH, KATE21868 95093 7/13/2020 HIX, LIX Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21865 001-2111 2,080.00 Total : 2,080.0021865 95094 7/13/2020 HOLMAN PROFESSIONAL INV2016000 EAP PROG/PART-TIME EMPLOYEES/MAY2013909 001-1203-4189 507.52 EAP PROG/PART-TIME EMPLOYEES/MAY20INV2016204 001-1203-4189 488.00 Total : 995.5213909 95095 7/13/2020 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 3010764 REQ 586768/LOT A/MAINT SUPPLIES03432 001-3104-4309 242.15 Total : 242.1503432 95096 7/13/2020 HOWARD, EMMA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21878 001-2111 740.00 Total : 740.0021878 95097 7/13/2020 IAIA, SALVATORE Parcel 4184-024-033 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE20488 001-6871 124.12 105-3105 24.61 Total : 148.7320488 95098 7/13/2020 INDELICATO, PETER Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21886 001-2111 740.00 Total : 740.0021886 95099 7/13/2020 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 55689 ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING/NOV1921849 001-3104-4201 6,152.50 ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING/DEC1956658 001-3104-4201 6,150.00 ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING/JAN2057309 001-3104-4201 5,920.00 ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING/FEB2058251 001-3104-4201 6,430.00 Total : 24,652.5021849 95100 7/13/2020 JACKSON, JAMIE Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21899 59 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 95100 7/13/2020 (Continued)JACKSON, JAMIE21899 001-2111 1,560.00 Total : 1,560.0021899 95101 7/13/2020 JAUREGUI, VALERIE Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21866 001-2111 780.00 Total : 780.0021866 95102 7/13/2020 JOHN L HUNTER AND ASSOC INC HBNP0420 STORM WATER PROGRAM ADMIN/APR2005356 161-3109-4201 6,109.25 Total : 6,109.2505356 95103 7/13/2020 JOYE, MAGDALENA Receipt 2002077.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21908 001-2111 195.00 Total : 195.0021908 95104 7/13/2020 KAKUK, MARITA Reciept 2002029.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21907 001-2111 195.00 Total : 195.0021907 95105 7/13/2020 KAUFMAN, HOWARD Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21836 001-2111 1,110.00 Total : 1,110.0021836 95106 7/13/2020 KEIM, KIMBERLY Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21888 001-2111 555.00 Total : 555.0021888 95107 7/13/2020 KELLEHER, JEFF Receipt 2002370.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21876 001-2111 185.00 Total : 185.0021876 95108 7/13/2020 KENT, DAVINA PO 35109 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE REFUND21841 001-3840 1,009.06 Total : 1,009.0621841 95109 7/13/2020 KOSTAS, ROULA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21819 001-2111 370.00 Total : 370.0021819 60 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 95110 7/13/2020 KOWK, KAY MAY Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21875 001-2111 260.00 Total : 260.0021875 95111 7/13/2020 KURZ, KATE Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21823 001-2111 740.00 Total : 740.0021823 95112 7/13/2020 LAHMON, FABIANA Receipt 2002069.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21906 001-2111 195.00 Total : 195.0021906 95113 7/13/2020 LANDGREEN, SONYA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21885 001-2111 740.00 Total : 740.0021885 95114 7/13/2020 LAWLOR, JEANNIE Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21912 001-2111 1,480.00 Total : 1,480.0021912 95115 7/13/2020 LEFKOWITZ, EMILY Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21835 001-2111 1,110.00 Total : 1,110.0021835 95116 7/13/2020 LEONE, EMILY Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21853 001-2111 585.00 Total : 585.0021853 95117 7/13/2020 LEWIS, CRISTI Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21874 001-2111 555.00 Total : 555.0021874 95118 7/13/2020 LINDSEY, BILL Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21880 001-2111 740.00 Total : 740.0021880 95119 7/13/2020 LOPATA, CALEN Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND18727 001-2111 555.00 Total : 555.0018727 61 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 95120 7/13/2020 MACDONALD, MEGAN Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21833 001-2111 1,670.00 Total : 1,670.0021833 95121 7/13/2020 MANCUSO, MARY JANE Covid-19 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21863 001-2111 1,040.00 Total : 1,040.0021863 95122 7/13/2020 MANUEL, REGGIE PO 35095 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 4301006621801 001-3302 53.00 Total : 53.0021801 95123 7/13/2020 MARRAN, KIMBERLY Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21910 001-2111 1,110.00 Total : 1,110.0021910 95124 7/13/2020 MARTIN, KATIE PO 35096 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3101927721796 001-3302 53.00 Total : 53.0021796 95125 7/13/2020 MARTINEZ, MOSES PO 35097 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3701152221799 001-3302 53.00 Total : 53.0021799 95126 7/13/2020 MAXIMOUS, MEDHAT F Parcel 4184-013-032 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE16451 001-6871 124.12 105-3105 24.61 Total : 148.7316451 95127 7/13/2020 MELO, LUCIANA Receipt 2002030.003 SUMMER CAMP REFUND21850 001-2111 195.00 Total : 195.0021850 95128 7/13/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 26910 SARMIENTO/EMAS/BUSINESS CARDS12055 001-1208-4305 162.00 001-1208-4305 15.39 Total : 177.3912055 95129 7/13/2020 MIYATA, MELISSA PO 35098 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3701265921800 001-3302 10.00 62 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 10.00 95129 7/13/2020 MIYATA, MELISSA21800 95130 7/13/2020 MORENO, GEORGINA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21893 001-2111 925.00 Total : 925.0021893 95131 7/13/2020 MORILLO, DIVA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21859 001-2111 390.00 Total : 390.0021859 95132 7/13/2020 MT OLYMPUS BURRITO PROJECT Covid-19 Refund THEATRE PERMIT REFUNDS21914 001-2111 600.00 Total : 600.0021914 95133 7/13/2020 NACHTRIEB, HAROLD Receipt 2002087.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21246 001-2111 185.00 Total : 185.0021246 95134 7/13/2020 NEUBAUER, HEATHER Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21877 001-2111 740.00 Total : 740.0021877 95135 7/13/2020 NORIDIAN MEDICARE JE PART B PO 35087 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE REFUND20214 001-3840 353.70 Total : 353.7020214 95136 7/13/2020 OAKES, BELINDA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21891 001-2111 370.00 Total : 370.0021891 95137 7/13/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 509976881001 MAT REQ 874174/OFFICE SUPPLIES13114 001-2101-4305 44.71 Total : 44.7113114 95138 7/13/2020 OLIVER, SONYA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21858 001-2111 1,110.00 Total : 1,110.0021858 95139 7/13/2020 OLSON, CASSIDY Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21911 001-2111 370.00 63 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 370.00 95139 7/13/2020 OLSON, CASSIDY21911 95140 7/13/2020 PEP BOYS 8141077279 to 748 AUTO SUPPLIES/MAY2000608 715-2101-4311 188.51 715-3102-4311 203.12 715-3104-4311 142.30 Total : 533.9300608 95141 7/13/2020 PERNICE, JAIMIE Receipt 2002345.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21822 001-2111 185.00 Total : 185.0021822 95142 7/13/2020 PLATA, YUNUEN PO 35074 TUITION/BOOKS REIMB/SPRING '2018411 001-2101-4317 1,892.50 Total : 1,892.5018411 95143 7/13/2020 POLSKY-KEHAGAIRAS, CINDY Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21812 001-2111 370.00 Total : 370.0021812 95144 7/13/2020 PURCIEL, DUSTIN PO 35099 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3701142921798 001-3302 48.00 Total : 48.0021798 95145 7/13/2020 RIVA, LUCIA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND12944 001-2111 1,950.00 Total : 1,950.0012944 95146 7/13/2020 ROCK N ROLL CAR WASH LLC HB0120 CITY CAR WASHES/JAN2018596 715-4202-4311 7.00 001-4601-4305 7.00 715-4201-4311 7.00 715-3302-4311 21.00 715-2101-4311 147.00 CITY CAR WASHES/FEB20HB022020 715-4202-4311 21.00 715-4201-4311 21.00 715-3302-4311 21.00 715-2101-4311 189.00 001-4601-4305 7.00 64 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 13 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 448.00 95146 7/13/2020 ROCK N ROLL CAR WASH LLC18596 95147 7/13/2020 RON TURLEY ASSOCIATES 58677 FLEET MAINT SOFTWARE12788 715-4206-4201 950.00 Total : 950.0012788 95148 7/13/2020 ROTROCK, WHITNEY PO 35100 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3002076921804 001-3302 38.00 Total : 38.0021804 95149 7/13/2020 RYAN, ELLEN Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21902 001-2111 275.00 Total : 275.0021902 95150 7/13/2020 SAFEWAY INC VONS 664146-021220-2110 SUMMER CAMP FAIR/SNICKERS16425 001-4601-4308 18.59 STAFF MEETING/VEGGIE TRAY/COOKIES721722-030620-2110 001-4601-4317 22.06 Total : 40.6516425 95151 7/13/2020 SAMBUCHI, DEBI Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21829 001-2111 2,590.00 Total : 2,590.0021829 95152 7/13/2020 SANCHEZ, EDWIN ALAN PO 35148 KC EQUIP UNDERPAY RESTITUTION21753 140-8687-4201 1,701.00 Total : 1,701.0021753 95153 7/13/2020 SBPTC 060820-03 33 SWORN/MEMBERSHIP/JUL20-JUN2119937 001-2101-4315 330.00 Total : 330.0019937 95154 7/13/2020 SCHULER, TARA Receipt 2002367.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21788 001-2111 185.00 Total : 185.0021788 95155 7/13/2020 SHARP, SHANNON Receipt 2002078.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21900 001-2111 195.00 Total : 195.0021900 65 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 14 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 95156 7/13/2020 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 31906 thru 01445 PAINTING SUPPLIES/MAY2017903 001-3104-4309 288.80 Total : 288.8017903 95157 7/13/2020 SKEATH, TAMMY Rec 2002376003/7003 SURF CAMP REFUND21867 001-2111 780.00 Total : 780.0021867 95158 7/13/2020 SLAYBACK, RACHEL Receipt 2002017.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21851 001-2111 185.00 Total : 185.0021851 95159 7/13/2020 SMART & FINAL 3220630012962 REQ 479146/BRIEFING RM/PLATES/COFFEE00114 001-2101-4305 45.75 REQ 479150/JAIL/COFFEE/PLATES/CUPS/CRM3220630016579 001-2101-4306 102.68 REQ 479150/BRIEFING RM/FORKS3220630016582 001-2101-4305 21.88 REQ 479144/JAIL/COFFEE SUPPLIES/PLATES3220630034288 001-2101-4306 109.54 REQ 479146/BRIEFING RM/FORKS/SPOONS3220630051657 001-2101-4305 21.88 MAT REQ 751591/OFFICE SUPPLIES3220630054469 001-3302-4309 129.16 Total : 430.8900114 95160 7/13/2020 SOTHERAN, SARAH Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21834 001-2111 780.00 Total : 780.0021834 95161 7/13/2020 SOURCE GRAPHICS INC 105456 LARGE-FORMAT PRINTER MAINT/MAR20-FEB2013761 715-1206-4201 1,644.80 LARGE-FORMAT SCANNER MAINT/MAR20-FEB21105457 715-1206-4201 1,895.00 LARGE-FORMAT PRINTER/PLOTTER PAPER105506 001-4202-4305 66.52 001-4202-4305 19.27 Total : 3,625.5913761 95162 7/13/2020 SOUTH BAY CENTER FOR PO 34263 DISPUTE RESOLUTION/APR20-JUN2010764 66 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 15 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 95162 7/13/2020 (Continued)SOUTH BAY CENTER FOR10764 001-1132-4201 950.00 Total : 950.0010764 95163 7/13/2020 SOUTH BAY FORD 657882 REQ 309673/SPEED SENSOR/VEHICLE 7610532 715-6101-4311 55.20 Total : 55.2010532 95164 7/13/2020 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC COMM 03847 DISPATCH SERVICES/JUL20-SEP2008812 001-2101-4251 254,713.95 001-3302-4251 28,301.55 Total : 283,015.5008812 95165 7/13/2020 SPRINT 551834312-222 COMM RES/CELL PHONES/MAY2010098 001-4601-4304 161.81 Total : 161.8110098 95166 7/13/2020 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY 17380054 PANIC SYS MAINT/MAY20-APR2116806 715-2101-4201 2,814.96 JAIL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE MAINT/JUL20-JUN217500617 715-2101-4201 11,269.44 BARD VIDEO SURVEILL MAINT/JUL20-JUN2117521439 715-2101-4201 1,385.16 Total : 15,469.5616806 95167 7/13/2020 STEWART, KELLEY Receipt 2002240.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21903 001-2111 195.00 Total : 195.0021903 95168 7/13/2020 SUTHERLAND PAIGE & ASSOC PO 35101 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3800221921803 001-3302 38.00 Total : 38.0021803 95169 7/13/2020 TABAK, GABRIELLE Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21827 001-2111 3,640.00 Total : 3,640.0021827 95170 7/13/2020 TARANGO, CHERYL Parcel 4184-019-027 SEWER & STREET LIGHT TAX REBATE11818 105-3105 24.61 001-6871 124.12 67 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 16 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 148.73 95170 7/13/2020 TARANGO, CHERYL11818 95171 7/13/2020 TENG, CONNIE Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21813 001-2111 1,820.00 Total : 1,820.0021813 95172 7/13/2020 TORRICO, ANN Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21916 001-2111 1,110.00 Total : 1,110.0021916 95173 7/13/2020 TSAI, KELLY Receipt 2001950.003 VALLEY PARK RESERVATION REFUND21915 001-2111 68.00 Total : 68.0021915 95174 7/13/2020 TUEY, RICHARD Parcel 4187-033-004 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE15057 001-6871 124.12 105-3105 24.61 Total : 148.7315057 95175 7/13/2020 TWOOMEY, JULIA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21734 001-2111 370.00 Total : 370.0021734 95176 7/13/2020 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 520200315 DIG ALERTS/MAY2008207 160-3102-4201 110.65 DIG ALERTS/STATE FEES/MAY20dsb20192767 160-3102-4201 42.66 Total : 153.3108207 95177 7/13/2020 UNITED NATURAL BODYBUILDING Covid-19 Refund THEATRE PERMIT REFUNDS13917 001-2111 600.00 Total : 600.0013917 95178 7/13/2020 VARGAS GARDNER, LISA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21869 001-2111 370.00 Total : 370.0021869 95179 7/13/2020 VCA COAST ANIMAL HOSPITAL 401445178 K9 OFFICER/DOG FOOD/25 LBS09672 170-2105-4201 73.57 68 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 17 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 73.57 95179 7/13/2020 VCA COAST ANIMAL HOSPITAL09672 95180 7/13/2020 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 71473018 VOIP PHONES/EOC GYM/APR2018666 001-1201-4304 61.36 Total : 61.3618666 95181 7/13/2020 VIALPANDO, DAVID PO 35102 DISMISSED CITATION NO. 3101963021797 001-3302 53.00 Total : 53.0021797 95182 7/13/2020 VINCENTE MILLER, JULIANA Receipt 2001962.003 SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21856 001-2111 195.00 Total : 195.0021856 95183 7/13/2020 VIZIA, ANTOINETTE Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21828 001-2111 3,640.00 Total : 3,640.0021828 95184 7/13/2020 VOCKE, MELISSA Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21832 001-2111 1,295.00 Total : 1,295.0021832 95185 7/13/2020 WHITWER, DESERIEE Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21892 001-2111 370.00 Total : 370.0021892 95186 7/13/2020 YU, JESSIE Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21860 001-2111 390.00 Total : 390.0021860 95187 7/13/2020 ZAW, NORIKO Covid-19 Refund SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND21896 001-2111 740.00 Total : 740.0021896 95188 7/13/2020 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 88668 MAT REQ 987152/STREET SIGN MAINTENANCE01206 001-3104-4309 809.41 MAT REQ 987157/WET PAINT SIGNS (50)88848 001-3104-4309 684.86 REQ 987158/PARKING LOT/STRUCTURE SIGNS88927 001-3104-4309 635.58 69 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 18 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 2,129.85 95188 7/13/2020 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC01206 710103524 6/22/2020 SOCAL GAS Acct 115 404 6900 1 734 PIER/NATURAL GAS/MAY2000170 001-4204-4303 102.31 Total : 102.3100170 740232417 6/23/2020 SOCAL GAS 7/9/20 Check Run CITY BLDGS/NATURAL GAS/MAY2000170 001-4204-4303 128.77 Total : 128.7700170 2072072120 7/6/2020 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 7/13/20 Check Run WORK COMP CLAIMS REIMB/JUN2014691 705-1217-4324 26,967.50 Total : 26,967.5014691 2072103420 7/2/2020 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 7/13/20 Check Run WORK COMP CLAIMS REIMB/JUN2014691 705-1217-4324 31,630.14 Total : 31,630.1414691 2072173134 7/6/2020 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 7/13/20 Check Run LIABILITY CLAIMS REIMB/MAY2014691 705-1209-4324 9,999.68 Total : 9,999.6814691 2072193430 7/6/2020 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 7/13/20 Check Run LIABILITY CLAIMS REIMB/JUN2014691 705-1209-4324 5,439.45 Total : 5,439.4514691 2072592405 7/6/2020 ADMINSURE AS AGENT FOR THE 7/13/20 Check Run WORK COMP CLAIMS REIMB/MAY2014691 705-1217-4324 7,601.40 Total : 7,601.4014691 Bank total : 511,526.86 161 Vouchers for bank code :boa 511,526.86Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 161 70 07/13/2020 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 19 12:36:23PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount "I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 19 inclusive, of the check register for 7/13/2020 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget." By Finance Director Date 7/13/2020 71 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0478 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR JUNE 2020 (Finance Director Viki Copeland) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the June 2020 Financial Reports. Summary: Attached are the June 2020 Revenue and Expenditure reports.The reports provide detail by revenue account and by department for expenditures, with summaries by fund at the end of each report. The June 2020 Revenue and Expenditure reports are not the final reports for the year as accounting adjustments must be made to “close the books”.Totals for both revenue and expenditures will change when these entries are made. This CIP Report groups the funding for each project together,which is similar to how the projects are shown in the budget.In the regular Expenditure Report,the CIPs appear at the end of each fund; therefore,the total funding is not displayed in one place.The June 2020 CIP report will continue to be updated to reflect payments made for purchases or services performed in Fiscal Year 2019-20,but not paid until 2020-21. This is not the final report for 2019-20. Attachments: 1.June 2020 Revenue Report 2.June 2020 Expenditure Report 3.June 2020 CIP Report Respectfully Submitted by: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™72 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 15,212,078.00 14,983,458.91 14,983,458.91 228,619.09 98.50 3102 Current Year Unsecured 572,826.00 539,545.45 539,545.45 33,280.55 94.19 3103 Prior Year Collections 0.00 33,485.28 33,485.28 -33,485.28 0.00 3106 Supplemental Roll SB813 332,773.00 401,143.34 401,143.34 -68,370.34 120.55 3107 Transfer Tax 252,800.00 289,130.13 289,130.13 -36,330.13 114.37 3108 Sales Tax 2,791,797.00 2,255,069.08 2,255,069.08 536,727.92 80.77 3109 1/2 Cent Sales Tx Ext 250,949.00 204,739.66 204,739.66 46,209.34 81.59 3110 Spectrum Cable TV Franchise 180,000.00 136,393.21 136,393.21 43,606.79 75.77 3111 Electric Franchise 77,790.00 77,789.54 77,789.54 0.46 100.00 3112 Gas Franchise 40,597.00 40,597.04 40,597.04 -0.04 100.00 3113 Refuse Franchise 254,418.00 253,867.18 253,867.18 550.82 99.78 3114 Transient Occupancy Tax 2,368,611.00 2,391,797.04 2,391,797.04 -23,186.04 100.98 3115 Business License 737,335.00 978,081.57 978,081.57 -240,746.57 132.65 3120 Utility User Tax 2,147,057.00 1,931,812.59 1,931,812.59 215,244.41 89.97 3122 Property tax In-lieu of Veh Lic Fees 2,853,046.00 2,874,078.65 2,874,078.65 -21,032.65 100.74 3123 Frontier Cable Franchise Fee 171,000.00 116,773.24 116,773.24 54,226.76 68.29 Total Taxes 97.40 28,243,077.00 27,507,761.91 27,507,761.91 735,315.09 3200 Licenses And Permits 3202 Dog Licenses 18,000.00 19,874.50 19,874.50 -1,874.50 110.41 3204 Building Permits 510,000.00 487,041.84 487,041.84 22,958.16 95.50 3205 Electric Permits 68,000.00 81,166.00 81,166.00 -13,166.00 119.36 1Page: 73 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3206 Plumbing Permits 59,500.00 67,398.94 67,398.94 -7,898.94 113.28 3207 Occupancy Permits 16,000.00 12,096.00 12,096.00 3,904.00 75.60 3208 Grease Trap Permits 2,380.00 2,841.00 2,841.00 -461.00 119.37 3209 Garage Sales 70.00 70.00 70.00 0.00 100.00 3211 Banner Permits 1,400.00 1,328.00 1,328.00 72.00 94.86 3213 Animal Redemption Fee 400.00 259.00 259.00 141.00 64.75 3214 Amplified Sound Permit 4,202.00 5,261.00 5,261.00 -1,059.00 125.20 3215 Temporary Sign Permit 1,202.00 1,290.00 1,290.00 -88.00 107.32 3217 Open Fire Permit 0.00 495.00 495.00 -495.00 0.00 3219 Newsrack Permits 162.00 0.00 0.00 162.00 0.00 3226 Admin Permit - Limited Outdoor Seating 0.00 513.00 513.00 -513.00 0.00 3227 Mechanical Permits 46,750.00 49,128.00 49,128.00 -2,378.00 105.09 3230 Temporary Minor Special Event Permit 2,535.00 2,535.00 2,535.00 0.00 100.00 3236 Drone Permit Fee 3,415.00 2,470.00 2,470.00 945.00 72.33 3239 A-Frame sign Permit 0.00 332.00 332.00 -332.00 0.00 Total Licenses And Permits 100.01 734,016.00 734,099.28 734,099.28 -83.28 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3301 Municipal Court Fines 46,652.00 57,848.06 57,848.06 -11,196.06 124.00 3302 Court Fines /Parking 2,008,460.00 1,969,312.71 1,969,312.71 39,147.29 98.05 3305 Administrative Fines 7,300.00 7,600.00 7,600.00 -300.00 104.11 3306 Nuisance Abatement- Restrooms 22,000.00 5,600.00 5,600.00 16,400.00 25.45 Total Fines & Forfeitures 97.89 2,084,412.00 2,040,360.77 2,040,360.77 44,051.23 2Page: 74 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 201,183.00 182,665.93 182,665.93 18,517.07 90.80 3402 Rents & Concessions 466.00 466.08 466.08 -0.08 100.02 3404 Community Center Leases 20,150.00 19,058.20 19,058.20 1,091.80 94.58 3405 Community Center Rentals 137,718.00 147,828.99 147,828.99 -10,110.99 107.34 3406 Community Center Theatre 58,119.00 60,766.75 60,766.75 -2,647.75 104.56 3418 Special Events 89,553.00 90,863.60 90,863.60 -1,310.60 101.46 3425 Ground Lease 39,372.00 39,381.60 39,381.60 -9.60 100.02 3427 Cell Site License- Sprint 40,807.00 40,051.47 40,051.47 755.53 98.15 3428 Cell Site License - Verizon 33,721.00 33,721.00 33,721.00 0.00 100.00 3429 Inmate Phone Services 1,000.00 618.96 618.96 381.04 61.90 3431 Storage Facility Operating Lease 180,000.00 180,000.00 180,000.00 0.00 100.00 3432 Film Permits 55,768.00 55,650.66 55,650.66 117.34 99.79 3450 Investment Discount 73.00 76.85 76.85 -3.85 105.27 Total Use Of Money & Property 99.21 857,930.00 851,150.09 851,150.09 6,779.91 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3507 Highway Maintenance 2,300.00 0.00 0.00 2,300.00 0.00 3508 Mandated Costs 10,387.00 10,387.00 10,387.00 0.00 100.00 3509 Homeowner Property Tax Relief 82,723.00 81,196.32 81,196.32 1,526.68 98.15 3510 POST 14,367.00 10,693.86 10,693.86 3,673.14 74.43 3511 STC-Service Officer Training 6,600.00 9,570.00 9,570.00 -2,970.00 145.00 3575 VLF Coll Excess of $14m-Rev code 11001.5 15,708.00 15,707.91 15,707.91 0.09 100.00 3Page: 75 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd Total Intergovernmental/State 96.57 132,085.00 127,555.09 127,555.09 4,529.91 3800 Current Service Charges 3801 Residential Inspection 53,000.00 52,381.20 52,381.20 618.80 98.83 3802 Planning Sign Permit/Master Sign Program 12,942.00 12,873.00 12,873.00 69.00 99.47 3803 Negative Declaration 3,503.00 0.00 0.00 3,503.00 0.00 3804 General Plan Maintenance Fees 104,550.00 93,522.00 93,522.00 11,028.00 89.45 3805 Amendment to Planning Entitlement 21,748.00 20,092.25 20,092.25 1,655.75 92.39 3809 Tentative Map Review 9,502.00 2,340.50 2,340.50 7,161.50 24.63 3810 Final Map Review 5,012.00 1,402.00 1,402.00 3,610.00 27.97 3812 Conditional Use Permit - Comm/Other 19,602.00 29,622.00 29,622.00 -10,020.00 151.12 3813 Plan Check Fees 346,800.00 368,916.26 368,916.26 -22,116.26 106.38 3815 Public Works Services 82,775.00 103,394.11 103,394.11 -20,619.11 124.91 3816 Utility Trench Service Connect Permit 94,675.00 65,526.50 65,526.50 29,148.50 69.21 3817 Address Change Request Fee 3,140.00 3,620.00 3,620.00 -480.00 115.29 3818 Police Services 6,808.00 6,170.00 6,170.00 638.00 90.63 3819 Jail Services 2,160.00 1,649.00 1,649.00 511.00 76.34 3821 Daily Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 40,455.00 45,322.00 45,322.00 -4,867.00 112.03 3823 Special Event Security/Police 71,886.00 71,885.19 71,885.19 0.81 100.00 3824 500' Noticing 20,440.00 21,824.00 21,824.00 -1,384.00 106.77 3825 Public Notice Posting 4,620.00 4,620.00 4,620.00 0.00 100.00 3827 Library Grounds Maintenance 9,130.00 9,130.00 9,130.00 0.00 100.00 3831 Non-Utility Street Excavation Permit 40,824.00 51,730.64 51,730.64 -10,906.64 126.72 3834 Encroachment Permit 201,600.00 220,678.32 220,678.32 -19,078.32 109.46 4Page: 76 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3836 Refund Transaction Fee 1,020.00 1,155.00 1,155.00 -135.00 113.24 3837 Returned Check Charge 1,000.00 873.00 873.00 127.00 87.30 3838 Sale Of Maps/Publications 57.00 57.00 57.00 0.00 100.00 3839 Photocopy Charges 300.00 298.00 298.00 2.00 99.33 3840 Ambulance Transport 649,045.00 711,418.26 711,418.26 -62,373.26 109.61 3841 Police Towing 83,220.00 73,476.00 73,476.00 9,744.00 88.29 3842 Parking Meters 1,580,675.00 1,812,280.87 1,812,280.87 -231,605.87 114.65 3843 Parking Permits-Annual 312,097.00 380,996.00 380,996.00 -68,899.00 122.08 3844 Daily Parking Permits 2,000.00 1,666.00 1,666.00 334.00 83.30 3845 Lot A Revenue 368,721.00 395,539.00 395,539.00 -26,818.00 107.27 3846 No Pier Pkg Structure Revenue 456,681.00 456,686.25 456,686.25 -5.25 100.00 3848 Driveway Permits 3,500.00 3,508.00 3,508.00 -8.00 100.23 3849 Guest Permits 1,076.00 1,103.00 1,103.00 -27.00 102.51 3850 Contractors Permits 44,880.00 55,828.00 55,828.00 -10,948.00 124.39 3851 Cash Key Revenue -36.00 -48.00 -48.00 12.00 133.33 3852 Recreation Program Transaction Fee 29,490.00 32,928.59 32,928.59 -3,438.59 111.66 3855 Bus Passes 900.00 507.25 507.25 392.75 56.36 3856 500' - 2nd Noticing 3,242.00 2,691.00 2,691.00 551.00 83.00 3857 Parking Plan Application 4,623.00 3,467.25 3,467.25 1,155.75 75.00 3858 Monthly Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 86,056.00 100,920.00 100,920.00 -14,864.00 117.27 3859 Admin Permit - Abandon CUP 662.00 0.00 0.00 662.00 0.00 3862 Alarm Permit Fee 5,300.00 3,386.00 3,386.00 1,914.00 63.89 3865 Lot B Revenue 67,088.00 74,199.25 74,199.25 -7,111.25 110.60 3867 Precise Development Plans 5,472.00 10,944.00 10,944.00 -5,472.00 200.00 5Page: 77 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3868 Public Noticing/300 Ft Radius 3,304.00 808.00 808.00 2,496.00 24.46 3877 Business License Registration 10,030.00 12,814.00 12,814.00 -2,784.00 127.76 3879 Business License Renewal Fee 29,874.00 37,251.78 37,251.78 -7,377.78 124.70 3883 Final/Tentative Map Extension 1,016.00 1,016.00 1,016.00 0.00 100.00 3884 Lot Line Adjustment 838.00 0.00 0.00 838.00 0.00 3888 Slope/Grade Height Determination 13,066.00 15,979.00 15,979.00 -2,913.00 122.29 3893 Contract Recreation Classes 284,890.00 379,352.95 379,352.95 -94,462.95 133.16 3894 Other Recreation Programs 111,219.00 151,935.06 151,935.06 -40,716.06 136.61 3895 Zoning Information Letters 597.00 392.00 392.00 205.00 65.66 3897 Admin Fee/TULIP Ins Certificate 1,161.00 1,384.88 1,384.88 -223.88 119.28 3899 Condo - CUP/PDP 15,305.00 10,102.00 10,102.00 5,203.00 66.00 Total Current Service Charges 111.03 5,333,541.00 5,921,614.36 5,921,614.36 -588,073.36 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 5,563.00 5,562.48 5,562.48 0.52 99.99 3903 Contributions Non Govt 4,764.00 4,767.00 4,767.00 -3.00 100.06 3904 General Miscellaneous 8,629.00 16,837.47 16,837.47 -8,208.47 195.13 3907 Pkg Str Utility Reimb From Beach House 4,100.00 2,716.97 2,716.97 1,383.03 66.27 3908 Hermosa Sr Ctr Donations/Memberships 5,180.00 5,665.50 5,665.50 -485.50 109.37 3914 Planning EIR Admin Reimbursement 30,000.00 22,903.27 22,903.27 7,096.73 76.34 3938 Solid Waste Contract Admin Fee 56,016.00 51,347.78 51,347.78 4,668.22 91.67 3955 Operating Transfers In 402,922.00 402,922.00 402,922.00 0.00 100.00 3960 Verizon PEG Grant 0.00 8,671.25 8,671.25 -8,671.25 0.00 Total Other Revenue 100.82 517,174.00 521,393.72 521,393.72 -4,219.72 6Page: 78 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 6800 Current Service Charges Continued 6801 Mural Review 1,558.00 1,558.00 1,558.00 0.00 100.00 6804 Temporary Use Permit 533.00 533.00 533.00 0.00 100.00 6808 Request for Reasonable Accomodation 895.00 895.00 895.00 0.00 100.00 6809 Categorical Exemption 5,169.00 2,853.00 2,853.00 2,316.00 55.19 6810 Deed Restriction/Covenant Review 2,100.00 2,807.00 2,807.00 -707.00 133.67 6811 Landscape Plan Review 5,522.00 6,236.00 6,236.00 -714.00 112.93 6813 Zoning Code Interpretation Review 2,897.00 2,764.72 2,764.72 132.28 95.43 6818 New/Modified Business Zoning Review 8,576.00 8,942.00 8,942.00 -366.00 104.27 6819 Historic Resource Review 2,273.00 2,273.00 2,273.00 0.00 100.00 6821 Solar Plan Check/Inspection 3,917.00 4,175.54 4,175.54 -258.54 106.60 6822 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 132.00 128.00 128.00 4.00 96.97 6825 Clean Bay Restaurant - NPDES Inspection 20,600.00 0.00 0.00 20,600.00 0.00 6828 Public Improvement Plan Check 53,100.00 50,765.00 50,765.00 2,335.00 95.60 6832 DUI Collision Response 800.00 772.88 772.88 27.12 96.61 6834 Citation Sign-off 729.00 337.00 337.00 392.00 46.23 6836 Police Business Background Check 273.00 0.00 0.00 273.00 0.00 6837 Deceased Animal Pickup 120.00 59.00 59.00 61.00 49.17 6839 Pet Home Quarantine Review 61.00 0.00 0.00 61.00 0.00 6840 Multiple Dog Review 454.00 339.00 339.00 115.00 74.67 6851 Busines Licenses State Mandated Fee 7,021.00 9,493.20 9,493.20 -2,472.20 135.21 6860 Refuse Lien Fees/Athens 336.00 3,584.66 3,584.66 -3,248.66 1066.86 6861 Oversized Vehicle Permit 654.00 609.00 609.00 45.00 93.12 7Page: 79 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 6867 Credit Card Processing Fee 67,331.00 71,542.71 71,542.71 -4,211.71 106.26 6871 Sewer Service Charge Rebate -14,743.00 -11,314.29 -11,314.29 -3,428.71 76.74 6873 Impound Fee- Bicycle, Scooters & Wheeled 139.00 0.00 0.00 139.00 0.00 6875 Solid Waste Contract Reimbursement 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 0.00 6885 Temporary Outdoor Dining/Retail Permit 0.00 4,062.68 4,062.68 -4,062.68 0.00 Total Current Service Charges Continued 51.00 320,447.00 163,416.10 163,416.10 157,030.90 355,330.68 37,867,351.32 37,867,351.32 38,222,682.00 99.07Total General Fund 8Page: 80 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund105 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 456,000.00 445,498.26 445,498.26 10,501.74 97.70 3103 Prior Year Collections 5,000.00 4,076.01 4,076.01 923.99 81.52 3105 Assessment Rebates -3,200.00 -2,977.91 -2,977.91 -222.09 93.06 Total Taxes 97.55 457,800.00 446,596.36 446,596.36 11,203.64 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 235.00 198.13 198.13 36.87 84.31 3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.19 0.19 -0.19 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 84.39 235.00 198.32 198.32 36.68 3900 Other Revenue 3955 Operating Transfers In 234,963.00 234,963.00 234,963.00 0.00 100.00 Total Other Revenue 100.00 234,963.00 234,963.00 234,963.00 0.00 11,240.32 681,757.68 681,757.68 692,998.00 98.38Total Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 9Page: 81 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 State Gas Tax Fund115 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 6,925.00 7,147.83 7,147.83 -222.83 103.22 3450 Investment Discount 2.00 2.96 2.96 -0.96 148.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 103.23 6,927.00 7,150.79 7,150.79 -223.79 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3501 Section 2106 Allocation 68,816.00 62,217.84 62,217.84 6,598.16 90.41 3502 Section 2107 Allocation 136,189.00 127,836.35 127,836.35 8,352.65 93.87 3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 100.00 3512 Section 2105 (Prop 111) 108,757.00 101,241.24 101,241.24 7,515.76 93.09 3513 Sec 2103 Higher Mtr Veh Excise Tax(HUTA) 164,784.00 136,852.38 136,852.38 27,931.62 83.05 3566 Loan Repayment- HUTA Transportation Fds 22,312.00 22,312.38 22,312.38 -0.38 100.00 3567 Road Maintenance Rehab Account 365,643.00 291,255.41 291,255.41 74,387.59 79.66 Total Intergovernmental/State 85.67 870,501.00 745,715.60 745,715.60 124,785.40 124,561.61 752,866.39 752,866.39 877,428.00 85.80Total State Gas Tax Fund 10Page: 82 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 AB939 Fund117 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 2,053.00 1,277.76 1,277.76 775.24 62.24 3450 Investment Discount 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.15 85.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 62.25 2,054.00 1,278.61 1,278.61 775.39 3800 Current Service Charges 3860 AB939 Surcharge 61,528.00 57,421.59 57,421.59 4,106.41 93.33 Total Current Service Charges 93.33 61,528.00 57,421.59 57,421.59 4,106.41 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6800 Current Service Charges Continued Total Current Service Charges Continued 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,881.80 58,700.20 58,700.20 63,582.00 92.32Total AB939 Fund 11Page: 83 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Prop A Open Space Fund121 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3600 Intergovernmental/County 3608 Maintenance Allocation 20,557.00 0.00 0.00 20,557.00 0.00 20,557.00 0.00 0.00 20,557.00 0.00Total Prop A Open Space Fund 12Page: 84 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 13 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Tyco Fund122 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 26,149.00 26,319.75 26,319.75 -170.75 100.65 3426 Easement Agreement 337,932.00 253,449.00 253,449.00 84,483.00 75.00 3450 Investment Discount 9.00 9.54 9.54 -0.54 106.00 84,311.71 279,778.29 279,778.29 364,090.00 76.84Total Tyco Fund 13Page: 85 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 14 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3116 Parks & Recreation Facility Tax 7,793.00 7,793.00 7,793.00 0.00 100.00 Total Taxes 100.00 7,793.00 7,793.00 7,793.00 0.00 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 8,279.00 7,620.87 7,620.87 658.13 92.05 3450 Investment Discount 3.00 2.79 2.79 0.21 93.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 92.05 8,282.00 7,623.66 7,623.66 658.34 3900 Other Revenue 3910 Park/Recreation In Lieu Fee 53,404.00 17,216.00 17,216.00 36,188.00 32.24 Total Other Revenue 32.24 53,404.00 17,216.00 17,216.00 36,188.00 36,846.34 32,632.66 32,632.66 69,479.00 46.97Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 14Page: 86 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 15 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund135 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 87.00 94.40 94.40 -7.40 108.51 Total Use Of Money & Property 108.51 87.00 94.40 94.40 -7.40 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Spec Assessment Admin Fees 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 0.00 100.00 Total Other Revenue 100.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 0.00 -7.40 4,594.40 4,594.40 4,587.00 100.16Total Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund 15Page: 87 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 16 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund138 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 156.00 80.25 80.25 75.75 51.44 Total Use Of Money & Property 51.44 156.00 80.25 80.25 75.75 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.75 80.25 80.25 156.00 51.44Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 16Page: 88 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 17 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund139 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 82.00 84.40 84.40 -2.40 102.93 Total Use Of Money & Property 102.93 82.00 84.40 84.40 -2.40 3900 Other Revenue 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 0.00 100.00 Total Other Revenue 100.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 0.00 -2.40 3,584.40 3,584.40 3,582.00 100.07Total Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 17Page: 89 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 18 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Community Dev Block Grant140 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal 3720 Americans with Disabilities Act 146,081.00 0.00 0.00 146,081.00 0.00 146,081.00 0.00 0.00 146,081.00 0.00Total Community Dev Block Grant 18Page: 90 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 19 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Proposition A Fund145 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3117 Proposition A Transit 408,722.00 382,263.01 382,263.01 26,458.99 93.53 Total Taxes 93.53 408,722.00 382,263.01 382,263.01 26,458.99 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 23,513.00 8,389.59 8,389.59 15,123.41 35.68 3450 Investment Discount 0.00 4.42 4.42 -4.42 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 35.70 23,513.00 8,394.01 8,394.01 15,118.99 3800 Current Service Charges 3853 Dial-A-Taxi Program 3,500.00 3,350.00 3,350.00 150.00 95.71 3855 Bus Passes 500.00 316.70 316.70 183.30 63.34 Total Current Service Charges 91.67 4,000.00 3,666.70 3,666.70 333.30 41,911.28 394,323.72 394,323.72 436,235.00 90.39Total Proposition A Fund 19Page: 91 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 20 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Proposition C Fund146 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3118 Proposition C Local Return 339,024.00 317,088.16 317,088.16 21,935.84 93.53 Total Taxes 93.53 339,024.00 317,088.16 317,088.16 21,935.84 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 22,280.00 18,984.33 18,984.33 3,295.67 85.21 3450 Investment Discount 8.00 6.04 6.04 1.96 75.50 Total Use Of Money & Property 85.20 22,288.00 18,990.37 18,990.37 3,297.63 25,233.47 336,078.53 336,078.53 361,312.00 93.02Total Proposition C Fund 20Page: 92 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 21 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Measure R Fund147 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3119 Measure R Local Return Funds 254,268.00 237,475.80 237,475.80 16,792.20 93.40 Total Taxes 93.40 254,268.00 237,475.80 237,475.80 16,792.20 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 15,639.00 9,586.18 9,586.18 6,052.82 61.30 3450 Investment Discount 6.00 3.83 3.83 2.17 63.83 Total Use Of Money & Property 61.30 15,645.00 9,590.01 9,590.01 6,054.99 3900 Other Revenue 3970 Measure R SBCCOG South Bay Highway Pr 384,325.00 0.00 0.00 384,325.00 0.00 Total Other Revenue 0.00 384,325.00 0.00 0.00 384,325.00 407,172.19 247,065.81 247,065.81 654,238.00 37.76Total Measure R Fund 21Page: 93 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 22 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Measure M148 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3131 Measure M Local Return Funds 288,170.00 267,088.86 267,088.86 21,081.14 92.68 Total Taxes 92.68 288,170.00 267,088.86 267,088.86 21,081.14 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 5,360.00 2,559.40 2,559.40 2,800.60 47.75 3450 Investment Discount 2.00 1.36 1.36 0.64 68.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 47.76 5,362.00 2,560.76 2,560.76 2,801.24 23,882.38 269,649.62 269,649.62 293,532.00 91.86Total Measure M 22Page: 94 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 23 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Measure W Fund149 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3132 Measure W Local Returns 160,000.00 0.00 0.00 160,000.00 0.00 Total Taxes 0.00 160,000.00 0.00 0.00 160,000.00 3400 Use Of Money & Property Total Use Of Money & Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 160,000.00 0.00 0.00 160,000.00 0.00Total Measure W Fund 23Page: 95 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 24 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3558 Beverage Recycling Grant 5,300.00 5,203.00 5,203.00 97.00 98.17 3562 State Homeland Security Grant Program 63,640.00 63,640.00 63,640.00 0.00 100.00 3572 Local Coastal Assistance Grant 2017 52,161.00 84,186.61 84,186.61 -32,025.61 161.40 3573 Alcoholic Beverage Control Grant (ABC) 71,000.00 0.00 0.00 71,000.00 0.00 3585 BSCC Mental Health Training 2,970.00 0.00 0.00 2,970.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/State 78.45 195,071.00 153,029.61 153,029.61 42,041.39 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal 3732 STPL Street Improvement Reimb 116,819.00 0.00 0.00 116,819.00 0.00 3736 Bulletproof Vest Partnership 2,124.00 0.00 0.00 2,124.00 0.00 3751 DOJ Tobacco Law Enforcement Grant 75,404.00 4,563.14 4,563.14 70,840.86 6.05 Total Intergovernmental/Federal 2.35 194,347.00 4,563.14 4,563.14 189,783.86 3900 Other Revenue 3984 Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program 84,150.00 0.00 0.00 84,150.00 0.00 3985 California Green Business Program 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 100.00 Total Other Revenue 19.20 104,150.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 84,150.00 315,975.25 177,592.75 177,592.75 493,568.00 35.98Total Grants Fund 24Page: 96 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 25 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund152 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 432.00 432.57 432.57 -0.57 100.13 3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.20 0.20 -0.20 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 100.18 432.00 432.77 432.77 -0.77 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3538 AQMD Emission Control AB2766 25,000.00 18,808.17 18,808.17 6,191.83 75.23 3551 MSRC Discretionary Matching Funds 0.00 36,000.00 36,000.00 -36,000.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/State 219.23 25,000.00 54,808.17 54,808.17 -29,808.17 -29,808.94 55,240.94 55,240.94 25,432.00 217.21Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 25Page: 97 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 26 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)153 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3135 C.O.P.S. Allocation 124,581.00 128,413.99 128,413.99 -3,832.99 103.08 Total Taxes 103.08 124,581.00 128,413.99 128,413.99 -3,832.99 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 6,990.00 6,977.60 6,977.60 12.40 99.82 3450 Investment Discount 3.00 2.56 2.56 0.44 85.33 Total Use Of Money & Property 99.82 6,993.00 6,980.16 6,980.16 12.84 -3,820.15 135,394.15 135,394.15 131,574.00 102.90Total Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF) 26Page: 98 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 27 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Sewer Fund160 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 157,010.00 138,196.59 138,196.59 18,813.41 88.02 3450 Investment Discount 57.00 49.88 49.88 7.12 87.51 Total Use Of Money & Property 88.02 157,067.00 138,246.47 138,246.47 18,820.53 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3550 CA Waste Oil Recycling Grant 5,475.00 0.00 0.00 5,475.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/State 0.00 5,475.00 0.00 0.00 5,475.00 3600 Intergovernmental/County 3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance 10,222.00 10,222.10 10,222.10 -0.10 100.00 Total Intergovernmental/County 100.00 10,222.00 10,222.10 10,222.10 -0.10 3800 Current Service Charges 3828 Sewer Connection Fee 12,000.00 10,604.00 10,604.00 1,396.00 88.37 3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 3,225.00 2,624.00 2,624.00 601.00 81.36 3832 Sewer Lateral Installation 14,480.00 15,111.00 15,111.00 -631.00 104.36 Total Current Service Charges 95.40 29,705.00 28,339.00 28,339.00 1,366.00 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6800 Current Service Charges Continued 6861 Sewer Service Charge 1,059,087.00 1,065,018.24 1,065,018.24 -5,931.24 100.56 27Page: 99 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 28 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Sewer Fund160 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd Total Current Service Charges Continued 100.56 1,059,087.00 1,065,018.24 1,065,018.24 -5,931.24 19,730.19 1,241,825.81 1,241,825.81 1,261,556.00 98.44Total Sewer Fund 28Page: 100 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 29 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Storm Drains Fund161 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 30,891.00 34,194.19 34,194.19 -3,303.19 110.69 3450 Investment Discount 11.00 5.35 5.35 5.65 48.64 Total Use Of Money & Property 110.67 30,902.00 34,199.54 34,199.54 -3,297.54 3900 Other Revenue 3955 Operating Transfers In 700,000.00 700,000.00 700,000.00 0.00 100.00 Total Other Revenue 100.00 700,000.00 700,000.00 700,000.00 0.00 -3,297.54 734,199.54 734,199.54 730,902.00 100.45Total Storm Drains Fund 29Page: 101 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 30 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3307 Department of Justice Forfeited Funds 0.00 77,557.53 77,557.53 -77,557.53 0.00 Total Fines & Forfeitures 0.00 0.00 77,557.53 77,557.53 -77,557.53 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 12,912.00 12,189.71 12,189.71 722.29 94.41 3450 Investment Discount 5.00 4.50 4.50 0.50 90.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 94.40 12,917.00 12,194.21 12,194.21 722.79 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -76,834.74 89,751.74 89,751.74 12,917.00 694.83Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 30Page: 102 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 31 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Fire Protection Fund180 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1,318.00 934.55 934.55 383.45 70.91 3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.37 0.37 -0.37 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 70.93 1,318.00 934.92 934.92 383.08 3900 Other Revenue 3912 Fire Flow Fee 12,000.00 10,294.23 10,294.23 1,705.77 85.79 Total Other Revenue 85.79 12,000.00 10,294.23 10,294.23 1,705.77 2,088.85 11,229.15 11,229.15 13,318.00 84.32Total Fire Protection Fund 31Page: 103 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 32 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 RTI Undersea Cable190 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 9,525.00 9,535.79 9,535.79 -10.79 100.11 3426 Easement Agreement-Longfellow 90,000.00 45,000.00 45,000.00 45,000.00 50.00 3427 Easement Cable 2-Longfellow 264,000.00 0.00 0.00 264,000.00 0.00 3450 Investment Discount 3.00 3.48 3.48 -0.48 116.00 308,988.73 54,539.27 54,539.27 363,528.00 15.00Total RTI Undersea Cable 32Page: 104 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 33 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 RTI Tidelands191 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 5,876.00 5,466.78 5,466.78 409.22 93.04 3426 Easement Agreement 192,000.00 0.00 0.00 192,000.00 0.00 3450 Investment Discount 2.00 1.80 1.80 0.20 90.00 192,409.42 5,468.58 5,468.58 197,878.00 2.76Total RTI Tidelands 33Page: 105 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 34 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds201 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3900 Other Revenue 3955 Operating Transfers In 789,863.00 640,974.99 640,974.99 148,888.01 81.15 148,888.01 640,974.99 640,974.99 789,863.00 81.15Total 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds 34Page: 106 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 35 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 200,742.00 203,492.67 203,492.67 -2,750.67 101.37 3450 Investment Discount 74.00 72.13 72.13 1.87 97.47 Total Use Of Money & Property 101.37 200,816.00 203,564.80 203,564.80 -2,748.80 3900 Other Revenue 3913 In-Lieu Fee/Street Pavement 11,245.00 11,245.00 11,245.00 0.00 100.00 3955 Operating Transfers In 593,736.00 593,736.00 593,736.00 0.00 100.00 Total Other Revenue 100.00 604,981.00 604,981.00 604,981.00 0.00 -2,748.80 808,545.80 808,545.80 805,797.00 100.34Total Capital Improvement Fund 35Page: 107 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 36 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2609 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 2,427.00 2,064.57 2,064.57 362.43 85.07 362.43 2,064.57 2,064.57 2,427.00 85.07Total Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2 36Page: 108 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 37 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund610 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 72.00 67.33 67.33 4.67 93.51 4.67 67.33 67.33 72.00 93.51Total Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund 37Page: 109 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 38 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund611 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 1,189.00 973.37 973.37 215.63 81.86 215.63 973.37 973.37 1,189.00 81.86Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund 38Page: 110 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 39 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund612 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 106.00 98.88 98.88 7.12 93.28 7.12 98.88 98.88 106.00 93.28Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund 39Page: 111 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 40 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund617 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 -33.87 -33.87 33.87 0.00 33.87-33.87-33.87 0.00 0.00Total Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund 40Page: 112 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 41 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Loma Drive Assessment Fund618 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 110.34 110.34 -110.34 0.00 -110.34 110.34 110.34 0.00 0.00Total Loma Drive Assessment Fund 41Page: 113 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 42 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2619 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 349.00 324.68 324.68 24.32 93.03 24.32 324.68 324.68 349.00 93.03Total Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2 42Page: 114 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 43 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Insurance Fund705 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3800 Current Service Charges 3880 Insurance Service Charges 2,707,639.00 2,707,639.00 2,707,639.00 0.00 100.00 Total Current Service Charges 100.00 2,707,639.00 2,707,639.00 2,707,639.00 0.00 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 200,000.00 203,000.00 203,000.00 -3,000.00 101.50 Total Other Revenue 101.50 200,000.00 203,000.00 203,000.00 -3,000.00 -3,000.00 2,910,639.00 2,910,639.00 2,907,639.00 100.10Total Insurance Fund 43Page: 115 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 44 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3800 Current Service Charges 3822 Building Maintenance Service Charges 101,556.00 101,556.00 101,556.00 0.00 100.00 3885 Comm Equip/Business Mach Charges 843,689.00 773,388.00 773,388.00 70,301.00 91.67 3889 Vehicle/Equip Replacement Charges 841,263.00 879,458.01 879,458.01 -38,195.01 104.54 Total Current Service Charges 98.20 1,786,508.00 1,754,402.01 1,754,402.01 32,105.99 3900 Other Revenue 3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 33,451.00 38,604.19 38,604.19 -5,153.19 115.41 3955 Operating Transfers In 93,145.00 93,145.00 93,145.00 0.00 100.00 Total Other Revenue 104.07 126,596.00 131,749.19 131,749.19 -5,153.19 6800 Current Service Charges Continued 6866 Records Technology Fee 85,000.00 88,584.39 88,584.39 -3,584.39 104.22 Total Current Service Charges Continued 104.22 85,000.00 88,584.39 88,584.39 -3,584.39 23,368.41 1,974,735.59 1,974,735.59 1,998,104.00 98.83Total Equipment Replacement Fund 44Page: 116 07/21/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 45 7:17PM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Investment Fund900 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 50,910.07 50,910.07 -50,910.07 0.00 -50,910.07 50,910.07 50,910.07 0.00 0.00Total Investment Fund Grand Total 52,106,758.00 49,823,115.95 49,823,115.95 2,283,642.05 95.62 45Page: 117 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 City Council1101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1101-4100 Personal Services 50,336.88 48,030.23 48,030.23 95.421101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 2,306.65 4,000.00 8,249.19 8,249.19 206.231101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -4,249.19 1,815.00 1,814.69 1,814.69 99.981101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.31 43,565.00 43,565.36 43,565.36 100.001101-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 -0.36 29,906.00 31,140.22 31,140.22 104.131101-4180 Retirement 0.00 -1,234.22 130.00 150.80 150.80 139.201101-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 30.16 -50.96 100,046.00 96,356.80 96,356.80 96.311101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 3,689.20 1,393.00 1,474.04 1,474.04 105.821101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 -81.04 1,445.00 1,442.50 1,442.50 99.831101-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 2.50 Total Personal Services 232,636.88 232,223.83 232,223.83 30.16 382.89 99.84 1101-4200 Contract Services 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 1,000.00 Total Contract Services 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 1101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 745.00 553.60 553.60 74.311101-4304 Telephone 0.00 191.40 12,000.00 10,669.71 10,669.71 89.821101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 109.27 1,221.02 31,237.00 31,236.09 31,236.09 100.001101-4315 Membership 0.00 0.91 15,000.00 12,364.32 12,364.32 82.601101-4317 Conference/Training 25.00 2,610.68 25,000.00 25,998.77 25,998.77 104.001101-4319 Special Events 0.00 -998.77 3,620.00 3,620.00 3,620.00 100.001101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 5,214.00 5,214.00 5,214.00 100.001101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 92,816.00 89,656.49 89,656.49 134.27 3,025.24 96.74 1101-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1101-5600 Buildings/Improvements 1Page: 118 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 City Council1101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total City Council 326,452.88 321,880.32 321,880.32 164.43 4,408.13 98.65 2Page: 119 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 City Clerk1121 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1121-4100 Personal Services 48,472.24 12,669.54 12,669.54 26.141121-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 35,802.70 0.00 78.82 78.82 0.001121-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -78.82 1,568.00 1,567.52 1,567.52 99.971121-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.48 86,114.00 79,455.47 79,455.47 92.271121-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 6,658.53 10,421.00 11,489.56 11,489.56 110.251121-4180 Retirement 0.00 -1,068.56 8,675.00 6,662.94 6,662.94 76.811121-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 2,012.06 1,698.00 1,768.24 1,768.24 104.141121-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 -70.24 3,430.00 3,430.99 3,430.99 100.031121-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 -0.99 Total Personal Services 160,378.24 117,123.08 117,123.08 0.00 43,255.16 73.03 1121-4200 Contract Services 27,500.00 3,183.50 3,183.50 11.581121-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 24,316.50 183,000.00 140,281.13 140,281.13 76.731121-4251 Contract Services/Govt 129.99 42,588.88 Total Contract Services 210,500.00 143,464.63 143,464.63 129.99 66,905.38 68.22 1121-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 900.00 365.52 365.52 40.611121-4304 Telephone 0.00 534.48 6,000.00 6,063.35 6,063.35 108.341121-4305 Office Oper Supplies 437.22 -500.57 590.00 55.00 55.00 9.321121-4315 Membership 0.00 535.00 2,000.00 650.01 650.01 32.501121-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 1,349.99 15,000.00 17,780.71 17,780.71 118.541121-4323 Public Noticing 0.00 -2,780.71 8,635.00 7,920.00 7,920.00 91.721121-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 715.00 612.00 612.00 612.00 100.001121-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 11,870.00 11,870.00 11,870.00 100.001121-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 45,607.00 45,316.59 45,316.59 437.22 -146.81 100.32 1121-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1121-5400 Equipment/Furniture 3Page: 120 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 City Clerk1121 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total City Clerk 416,485.24 305,904.30 305,904.30 567.21 110,013.73 73.59 4Page: 121 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 City Attorney1131 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1131-4200 Contract Services 450,000.00 440,687.05 440,687.05 97.931131-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 9,312.95 Total City Attorney 450,000.00 440,687.05 440,687.05 0.00 9,312.95 97.93 5Page: 122 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 City Prosecutor1132 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1132-4200 Contract Services 230,000.00 189,943.40 189,943.40 91.271132-4201 Contract Serv/Private 19,967.00 20,089.60 Total Contract Services 230,000.00 189,943.40 189,943.40 19,967.00 20,089.60 91.27 1132-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 110.00 65.89 65.89 59.901132-4304 Telephone 0.00 44.11 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 110.00 65.89 65.89 0.00 44.11 59.90 Total City Prosecutor 230,110.00 190,009.29 190,009.29 19,967.00 20,133.71 91.25 6Page: 123 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 City Attorney- Litigation1133 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1133-4200 Contract Services Total City Attorney- Litigation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7Page: 124 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 City Treasurer1141 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1141-4100 Personal Services 6,360.00 6,360.00 6,360.00 100.001141-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 0.00 439.00 465.86 465.86 106.121141-4180 Retirement 0.00 -26.86 14,647.00 13,978.30 13,978.30 95.431141-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 668.70 93.00 92.16 92.16 99.101141-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 0.84 Total Personal Services 21,539.00 20,896.32 20,896.32 0.00 642.68 97.02 1141-4200 Contract Services 12,327.00 16,125.86 16,125.86 137.921141-4201 Contract Serv/Private 875.00 -4,673.86 Total Contract Services 12,327.00 16,125.86 16,125.86 875.00 -4,673.86 137.92 1141-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 316.00 264.58 264.58 83.731141-4304 Telephone 0.00 51.42 1,300.00 1,321.80 1,321.80 101.681141-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 -21.80 95.00 95.00 95.00 100.001141-4315 Membership 0.00 0.00 4,730.00 4,334.00 4,334.00 91.631141-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 396.00 609.00 609.00 609.00 100.001141-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 450.00 450.00 450.00 100.001141-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 7,500.00 7,074.38 7,074.38 0.00 425.62 94.33 1141-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1141-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total City Treasurer 41,366.00 44,096.56 44,096.56 875.00 -3,605.56 108.72 8Page: 125 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 City Manager1201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1201-4100 Personal Services 740,882.88 744,116.26 744,116.26 100.441201-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 -3,233.38 4,000.00 11,583.81 11,583.81 289.601201-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -7,583.81 18,594.00 18,594.23 18,594.23 100.001201-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.23 21,222.31 36,100.82 36,100.82 170.111201-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 -14,878.51 76,538.00 84,274.04 84,274.04 110.111201-4180 Retirement 0.00 -7,736.04 102,327.00 96,101.80 96,101.80 93.921201-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 6,225.20 11,729.00 12,498.13 12,498.13 106.561201-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 -769.13 21,195.00 21,193.48 21,193.48 99.991201-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 1.52 Total Personal Services 996,488.19 1,024,462.57 1,024,462.57 0.00 -27,974.38 102.81 1201-4200 Contract Services 580,000.00 480,493.51 480,493.51 105.631201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 132,137.60 -32,631.11 37,663.00 29,710.46 29,710.46 78.891201-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 7,952.54 Total Contract Services 617,663.00 510,203.97 510,203.97 132,137.60 -24,678.57 104.00 1201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 7,400.00 8,712.19 8,712.19 117.731201-4304 Telephone 0.00 -1,312.19 10,000.00 5,315.39 5,315.39 64.891201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1,173.47 3,511.14 6,000.00 5,601.51 5,601.51 93.671201-4315 Membership 18.53 379.96 14,500.00 14,253.00 14,253.00 98.641201-4317 Conference/Training 50.00 197.00 12,378.00 11,352.00 11,352.00 91.711201-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 1,026.00 3,711.00 3,711.00 3,711.00 100.001201-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 45,948.00 45,948.00 45,948.00 100.001201-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 0.00 56,245.00 56,245.00 56,245.00 100.001201-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 156,182.00 151,138.09 151,138.09 1,242.00 3,801.91 97.57 1201-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1201-5400 Equipment/Furniture 9Page: 126 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 City Manager1201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 19,650.00 10,490.42 10,490.42 53.391201-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 9,159.58 11,843.00 511.32 511.32 4.691201-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 44.36 11,287.32 Total Equipment/Furniture 31,493.00 11,001.74 11,001.74 44.36 20,446.90 35.07 Total City Manager 1,801,826.19 1,696,806.37 1,696,806.37 133,423.96 -28,404.14 101.58 10Page: 127 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Finance Administration1202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1202-4100 Personal Services 554,982.00 556,242.77 556,242.77 100.231202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 -1,260.77 0.00 1,588.58 1,588.58 0.001202-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -1,588.58 16,928.00 18,261.39 18,261.39 107.881202-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -1,333.39 16,725.00 16,724.68 16,724.68 100.001202-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 0.32 189,795.00 193,804.72 193,804.72 102.111202-4180 Retirement 0.00 -4,009.72 79,972.00 81,731.10 81,731.10 102.201202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 -1,759.10 6,166.00 6,468.57 6,468.57 104.911202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 -302.57 21,416.00 21,417.96 21,417.96 100.011202-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 -1.96 Total Personal Services 885,984.00 896,239.77 896,239.77 0.00 -10,255.77 101.16 1202-4200 Contract Services 218,872.00 185,554.69 185,554.69 95.981202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 24,508.86 8,808.45 Total Contract Services 218,872.00 185,554.69 185,554.69 24,508.86 8,808.45 95.98 1202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 400.00 474.66 474.66 118.671202-4304 Telephone 0.00 -74.66 6,650.00 8,411.55 8,411.55 126.491202-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 -1,761.55 750.00 750.00 750.00 100.001202-4315 Membership 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 1,287.00 1,287.00 64.351202-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 713.00 26,383.00 24,189.00 24,189.00 91.681202-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 2,194.00 2,113.00 2,113.00 2,113.00 100.001202-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 34,322.00 34,322.00 34,322.00 100.001202-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 72,618.00 71,547.21 71,547.21 0.00 1,070.79 98.53 1202-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1202-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2,888.00 2,887.52 2,887.52 99.981202-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 0.48 Total Equipment/Furniture 2,888.00 2,887.52 2,887.52 0.00 0.48 99.98 11Page: 128 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Finance Administration1202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Finance Administration 1,180,362.00 1,156,229.19 1,156,229.19 24,508.86 -376.05 100.03 12Page: 129 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 13 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Human Resources1203 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1203-4100 Personal Services 162,000.00 150,451.86 150,451.86 92.871203-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 11,548.14 0.00 235.43 235.43 0.001203-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -235.43 852.00 852.05 852.05 100.011203-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.05 34,807.00 36,254.01 36,254.01 104.161203-4180 Retirement 0.00 -1,447.01 172,169.00 159,547.49 159,547.49 92.671203-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 12,621.51 2,419.00 3,624.83 3,624.83 149.851203-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 -1,205.83 8,157.00 8,158.50 8,158.50 100.021203-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 -1.50 1,500.00 1,319.11 1,319.11 87.941203-4191 Instant Bonuses 0.00 180.89 125,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 8.001203-4192 Signing Bonus 0.00 115,000.00 18,750.00 11,250.00 11,250.00 60.001203-4193 Retention Bonus 0.00 7,500.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-4194 Referral Bonus 0.00 25,000.00 Total Personal Services 550,654.00 381,693.28 381,693.28 0.00 168,960.72 69.32 1203-4200 Contract Services 320,582.00 217,525.59 217,525.59 75.791203-4201 Contract Serv/Private 25,450.40 77,606.01 11,000.00 8,078.50 8,078.50 73.441203-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 2,921.50 Total Contract Services 331,582.00 225,604.09 225,604.09 25,450.40 80,527.51 75.71 1203-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,900.00 1,205.87 1,205.87 63.471203-4304 Telephone 0.00 694.13 4,000.00 4,571.78 4,571.78 114.291203-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 -571.78 3,800.00 3,800.00 3,800.00 100.001203-4315 Membership 0.00 0.00 1,042.00 946.36 946.36 90.821203-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 95.64 12,000.00 12,921.48 12,921.48 107.681203-4320 Medical Exams 0.00 -921.48 8,490.00 7,788.00 7,788.00 91.731203-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 702.00 612.00 612.00 612.00 100.001203-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 15,497.00 15,497.00 15,497.00 100.001203-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 47,341.00 47,342.49 47,342.49 0.00 -1.49 100.00 1203-4900 Depreciation 13Page: 130 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 14 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Human Resources1203 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1203-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Human Resources 929,577.00 654,639.86 654,639.86 25,450.40 249,486.74 73.16 14Page: 131 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 15 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Finance Cashier1204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1204-4100 Personal Services 375,508.00 376,477.31 376,477.31 100.261204-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 -969.31 473.00 472.23 472.23 99.841204-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 0.77 6,829.00 7,063.91 7,063.91 103.441204-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -234.91 46,358.00 43,981.50 43,981.50 94.871204-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 2,376.50 104,016.00 107,781.52 107,781.52 103.621204-4180 Retirement 0.00 -3,765.52 12.00 14.20 14.20 142.001204-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 2.84 -5.04 100,752.00 100,123.43 100,123.43 99.381204-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 628.57 5,617.00 5,913.50 5,913.50 105.281204-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 -296.50 12,131.00 12,131.49 12,131.49 100.001204-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 -0.49 Total Personal Services 651,696.00 653,959.09 653,959.09 2.84 -2,265.93 100.35 1204-4200 Contract Services 125,789.00 127,026.20 127,026.20 105.771204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 6,016.91 -7,254.11 1,100.00 441.25 441.25 43.751204-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 40.00 618.75 Total Contract Services 126,889.00 127,467.45 127,467.45 6,056.91 -6,635.36 105.23 1204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,407.00 1,653.00 1,653.00 68.671204-4304 Telephone 0.00 754.00 39,980.00 36,447.80 36,447.80 91.921204-4305 Office Operating Supplies 302.44 3,229.76 350.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-4315 Membership 0.00 350.00 2,114.00 3,239.17 3,239.17 153.221204-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 -1,125.17 30,371.00 27,841.00 27,841.00 91.671204-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 2,530.00 1,828.00 1,828.00 1,828.00 100.001204-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 21,760.00 21,760.00 21,760.00 100.001204-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 98,810.00 92,768.97 92,768.97 302.44 5,738.59 94.19 1204-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Finance Cashier 877,395.00 874,195.51 874,195.51 6,362.19 -3,162.70 100.36 15Page: 132 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 16 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 General Appropriations1208 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1208-4100 Personal Services 28,150.00 28,150.00 28,150.00 100.001208-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 0.00 56.00 55.96 55.96 99.931208-4180 Retirement 0.00 0.04 Total Personal Services 28,206.00 28,205.96 28,205.96 0.00 0.04 100.00 1208-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1208-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 50.00 24.66 24.66 49.321208-4304 Telephone 0.00 25.34 -11,000.00 -8,614.38 -8,614.38 59.791208-4305 Office Oper Supplies 2,037.58 -4,423.20 Total Materials/Supplies/Other -10,950.00 -8,589.72 -8,589.72 2,037.58 -4,397.86 59.84 1208-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total General Appropriations 17,256.00 19,616.24 19,616.24 2,037.58 -4,397.82 125.49 16Page: 133 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 17 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Prospective Expenditures1214 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1214-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 145,757.69 487.10 487.10 0.661214-4322 Unclassified 468.84 144,801.75 Total Prospective Expenditures 145,757.69 487.10 487.10 468.84 144,801.75 0.66 17Page: 134 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 18 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,318,562.00 2,169,673.99 2,169,673.99 93.581299-4399 OperatingTransfers Out 0.00 148,888.01 Total Interfund Transfers Out 2,318,562.00 2,169,673.99 2,169,673.99 0.00 148,888.01 93.58 18Page: 135 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 19 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Police2101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2101-4100 Personal Services 4,705,332.00 4,742,395.64 4,742,395.64 100.792101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 -37,063.64 87,617.00 91,176.23 91,176.23 104.062101-4105 Special Duty Pay 0.00 -3,559.23 360,000.00 363,736.20 363,736.20 101.042101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -3,736.20 789,949.00 783,547.31 783,547.31 99.192101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 6,401.69 14,602.00 16,670.24 16,670.24 114.162101-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 -2,068.24 5,915.00 5,426.86 5,426.86 91.752101-4117 Shift Differential 0.00 488.14 2,500.00 3,230.50 3,230.50 129.222101-4118 Training Officer 0.00 -730.50 1,925,270.00 2,144,678.45 2,144,678.45 111.402101-4180 Retirement 0.00 -219,408.45 12,000.00 9,757.95 9,757.95 81.322101-4184 IRC 415(B) Retirement 0.00 2,242.05 26,441.00 26,662.23 26,662.23 100.842101-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 -221.23 973,608.00 939,151.83 939,151.83 96.462101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 34,456.17 81,276.00 89,158.86 89,158.86 109.702101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 -7,882.86 159,952.00 159,949.79 159,949.79 100.002101-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 2.21 Total Personal Services 9,144,462.00 9,375,542.09 9,375,542.09 0.00 -231,080.09 102.53 2101-4200 Contract Services 240,464.00 306,054.60 306,054.60 148.662101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 51,428.72 -117,019.32 994,926.00 939,675.89 939,675.89 94.452101-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 55,250.11 Total Contract Services 1,235,390.00 1,245,730.49 1,245,730.49 51,428.72 -61,769.21 105.00 2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 53,000.00 50,774.14 50,774.14 95.802101-4304 Telephone 0.00 2,225.86 40,000.00 43,913.12 43,913.12 119.512101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 3,891.62 -7,804.74 13,224.00 8,707.80 8,707.80 66.342101-4306 Prisoner Maintenance 65.00 4,451.20 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4307 Radio Maintenance 0.00 1,000.00 8,500.00 7,248.34 7,248.34 94.792101-4309 Maintenance Materials 809.15 442.51 14,637.00 5,406.14 5,406.14 36.932101-4312 Travel Expense , POST 0.00 9,230.86 6,600.00 874.00 874.00 13.242101-4313 Travel Expense, STC 0.00 5,726.00 14,000.00 15,915.78 15,915.78 115.332101-4314 Uniforms 230.85 -2,146.63 4,309.00 3,170.00 3,170.00 88.652101-4315 Membership 650.00 489.00 19Page: 136 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 20 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Police2101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 43,000.00 41,268.40 41,268.40 97.962101-4317 Conference/Training 853.35 878.25 3,724.00 4,082.40 4,082.40 109.622101-4350 Safety Gear 0.00 -358.40 445,966.00 408,804.00 408,804.00 91.672101-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 37,162.00 11,250.00 11,250.00 11,250.00 100.002101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 430,221.00 430,221.00 430,221.00 100.002101-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 0.00 1,201,292.00 1,201,292.00 1,201,292.00 100.002101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,290,723.00 2,232,927.12 2,232,927.12 6,499.97 51,295.91 97.76 2101-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2,820.00 2,819.84 2,819.84 108.672101-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 244.64 -244.48 Total Equipment/Furniture 2,820.00 2,819.84 2,819.84 244.64 -244.48 108.67 2101-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Police 12,673,395.00 12,857,019.54 12,857,019.54 58,173.33 -241,797.87 101.91 20Page: 137 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 21 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Crossing Guard2102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2102-4200 Contract Services 89,472.00 97,739.60 97,739.60 109.242102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -8,267.60 Total Crossing Guard 89,472.00 97,739.60 97,739.60 0.00 -8,267.60 109.24 21Page: 138 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 22 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 County Fire District Costs2202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2202-4100 Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002202-4111 Accrual Cash In -0.01 0.01 Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.01 0.00 2202-4200 Contract Services 5,205,668.00 5,391,127.97 5,391,127.97 103.562202-4251 Contract Services/Gov't -1.10 -185,458.87 Total Contract Services 5,205,668.00 5,391,127.97 5,391,127.97 -1.10 -185,458.87 103.56 2202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2202-5600 Buildings/Improvements 363,672.00 363,672.00 363,672.00 100.002202-5601 Buildings and Improvements 0.02 -0.02 Total Buildings/Improvements 363,672.00 363,672.00 363,672.00 0.02 -0.02 100.00 Total County Fire District Costs 5,569,340.00 5,754,799.97 5,754,799.97 -1.09 -185,458.88 103.33 22Page: 139 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 23 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Fire Department Legacy Costs2203 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2203-4100 Personal Services 587,579.00 587,579.00 587,579.00 103.152203-4180 Retirement 18,513.00 -18,513.00 Total Personal Services 587,579.00 587,579.00 587,579.00 18,513.00 -18,513.00 103.15 2203-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Fire Department Legacy Costs 587,579.00 587,579.00 587,579.00 18,513.00 -18,513.00 103.15 23Page: 140 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 24 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Street Maint/Traffic Safety3104 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3104-4100 Personal Services 328,847.00 323,271.18 323,271.18 98.303104-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 5,575.82 16,651.00 3,997.01 3,997.01 24.003104-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 12,653.99 22,405.00 22,405.27 22,405.27 100.003104-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.27 110,686.00 107,661.38 107,661.38 97.273104-4180 Retirement 0.00 3,024.62 59,999.00 56,400.53 56,400.53 94.003104-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 3,598.47 3,026.00 2,954.24 2,954.24 97.633104-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 71.76 11,196.00 11,195.99 11,195.99 100.003104-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 0.01 Total Personal Services 552,810.00 527,885.60 527,885.60 0.00 24,924.40 95.49 3104-4200 Contract Services 387,851.00 264,800.94 264,800.94 110.333104-4201 Contract Serv/Private 163,121.99 -40,071.93 35,294.00 5,554.07 5,554.07 28.573104-4251 Contract Service/Govt 4,530.69 25,209.24 Total Contract Services 423,145.00 270,355.01 270,355.01 167,652.68 -14,862.69 103.51 3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 8,240.00 9,817.72 9,817.72 119.153104-4303 Utilities 0.00 -1,577.72 115,000.00 91,755.99 91,755.99 79.943104-4309 Maintenance Materials 177.70 23,066.31 666.00 666.00 666.00 100.003104-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 60,741.00 60,741.00 60,741.00 100.003104-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 0.00 280,120.00 280,120.00 280,120.00 100.003104-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 464,767.00 443,100.71 443,100.71 177.70 21,488.59 95.38 3104-5400 Equipment/Furniture 25,308.00 25,307.37 25,307.37 100.003104-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.63 Total Equipment/Furniture 25,308.00 25,307.37 25,307.37 0.00 0.63 100.00 Total Street Maint/Traffic Safety 1,466,030.00 1,266,648.69 1,266,648.69 167,830.38 31,550.93 97.85 24Page: 141 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 25 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Downtown Enhancement3301 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3301-4100 Personal Services 35,619.00 34,288.23 34,288.23 96.263301-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 1,330.77 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.003301-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 1,200.00 2,602.00 2,601.74 2,601.74 99.993301-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.26 4,543.00 4,069.57 4,069.57 89.583301-4180 Retirement 0.00 473.43 4,046.00 3,689.56 3,689.56 91.193301-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 356.44 564.00 541.34 541.34 95.983301-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 22.66 1,153.00 1,152.50 1,152.50 99.963301-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits/OPEB 0.00 0.50 Total Personal Services 49,727.00 46,342.94 46,342.94 0.00 3,384.06 93.19 3301-4200 Contract Services 355,432.00 299,984.80 299,984.80 91.203301-4201 Contract Serv/Private 24,173.75 31,273.45 Total Contract Services 355,432.00 299,984.80 299,984.80 24,173.75 31,273.45 91.20 3301-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 43.15 43.15 0.003301-4303 Utilities 0.00 -43.15 3,000.00 603.87 603.87 20.133301-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 2,396.13 221.00 221.00 221.00 100.003301-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 560.00 560.00 560.00 100.003301-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 0.00 6,840.00 6,840.00 6,840.00 100.003301-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 10,621.00 8,268.02 8,268.02 0.00 2,352.98 77.85 3301-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3301-5400 Equipment/Furniture 0.00 2,538.18 2,538.18 0.003301-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 225.53 -2,763.71 Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 2,538.18 2,538.18 225.53 -2,763.71 0.00 Total Downtown Enhancement 415,780.00 357,133.94 357,133.94 24,399.28 34,246.78 91.76 25Page: 142 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 26 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Community Services3302 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3302-4100 Personal Services 1,028,026.00 995,977.14 995,977.14 96.883302-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 32,048.86 45,000.00 16,469.24 16,469.24 36.603302-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 28,530.76 30,629.00 34,908.34 34,908.34 113.973302-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -4,279.34 57,276.00 57,900.46 57,900.46 101.093302-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 -624.46 7,525.00 6,266.24 6,266.24 83.273302-4117 Shift Differential 0.00 1,258.76 329,251.00 335,617.27 335,617.27 101.933302-4180 Retirement 0.00 -6,366.27 50.00 69.90 69.90 167.763302-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 13.98 -33.88 5,529.00 5,252.05 5,252.05 94.993302-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 276.95 324,528.00 309,464.90 309,464.90 95.363302-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 15,063.10 20,044.00 16,203.80 16,203.80 80.843302-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 3,840.20 35,565.00 35,566.44 35,566.44 100.003302-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 -1.44 Total Personal Services 1,883,423.00 1,813,695.78 1,813,695.78 13.98 69,713.24 96.30 3302-4200 Contract Services 251,864.00 215,394.06 215,394.06 92.153302-4201 Contract Serv/Private 16,692.38 19,777.56 101,754.00 98,679.15 98,679.15 96.983302-4251 Contract Services/Govt 0.00 3,074.85 Total Contract Services 353,618.00 314,073.21 314,073.21 16,692.38 22,852.41 93.54 3302-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3,500.00 3,865.63 3,865.63 110.453302-4304 Telephone 0.00 -365.63 14,896.00 12,658.41 12,658.41 98.433302-4305 Office Operating Supplies 2,003.06 234.53 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4307 Radio Maintenance 0.00 1,000.00 36,986.00 25,622.31 25,622.31 69.773302-4309 Maintenance Materials 182.40 11,181.29 15,600.00 10,947.41 10,947.41 70.183302-4314 Uniforms 0.00 4,652.59 845.00 270.00 270.00 31.953302-4315 Membership 0.00 575.00 1,063.00 1,063.00 1,063.00 100.003302-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 0.00 125,201.00 114,763.00 114,763.00 91.663302-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 10,438.00 7,088.00 7,088.00 7,088.00 100.003302-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 117,634.00 117,634.00 117,634.00 100.003302-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 0.00 154,014.00 154,014.00 154,014.00 100.003302-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 26Page: 143 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 27 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Community Services3302 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Materials/Supplies/Other 477,827.00 447,925.76 447,925.76 2,185.46 27,715.78 94.20 3302-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3302-5400 Equipment/Furniture 1,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 1,450.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 1,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,450.00 0.00 3302-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Community Services 2,716,318.00 2,575,694.75 2,575,694.75 18,891.82 121,731.43 95.52 27Page: 144 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 28 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 North Pier Parking Structure3304 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3304-4200 Contract Services 105,902.00 59,722.32 59,722.32 57.483304-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,150.00 45,029.68 225.00 0.00 0.00 0.003304-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 225.00 Total Contract Services 106,127.00 59,722.32 59,722.32 1,150.00 45,254.68 57.36 3304-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 21,164.00 24,722.05 24,722.05 116.813304-4303 Utilities 0.00 -3,558.05 699.00 742.55 742.55 106.233304-4304 Telephone 0.00 -43.55 4,500.00 412.05 412.05 9.163304-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 4,087.95 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 26,363.00 25,876.65 25,876.65 0.00 486.35 98.16 3304-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total North Pier Parking Structure 132,490.00 85,598.97 85,598.97 1,150.00 45,741.03 65.48 28Page: 145 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 29 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Downtown Parking Lot A3305 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3305-4200 Contract Services 41,807.00 30,699.92 30,699.92 73.433305-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 11,107.08 Total Contract Services 41,807.00 30,699.92 30,699.92 0.00 11,107.08 73.43 3305-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003305-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 2,000.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 3305-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Downtown Parking Lot A 43,807.00 30,699.92 30,699.92 0.00 13,107.08 70.08 29Page: 146 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 30 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Co. Share Pkg Structure Rev.3306 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3306-4200 Contract Services 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003306-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 150,000.00 Total Co. Share Pkg Structure Rev. 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 0.00 30Page: 147 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 31 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Community Dev/Planning4101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4101-4100 Personal Services 550,292.00 465,013.66 465,013.66 84.504101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 85,278.34 1,200.00 1,092.71 1,092.71 91.064101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 107.29 17,522.00 21,279.92 21,279.92 121.454101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -3,757.92 124,497.00 117,140.41 117,140.41 94.094101-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 7,356.59 700.00 546.56 546.56 78.084101-4117 Shift Differential 0.00 153.44 100,895.00 103,193.60 103,193.60 102.284101-4180 Retirement 0.00 -2,298.60 150.00 146.10 146.10 116.884101-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 29.22 -25.32 240.00 240.00 240.00 100.004101-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 0.00 105,428.00 94,653.97 94,653.97 89.784101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 10,774.03 9,399.00 8,917.38 8,917.38 94.884101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 481.62 15,055.00 15,057.48 15,057.48 100.024101-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 -2.48 Total Personal Services 925,378.00 827,281.79 827,281.79 29.22 98,066.99 89.40 4101-4200 Contract Services 101,000.00 141,320.00 141,320.00 175.174101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 35,605.00 -75,925.00 Total Contract Services 101,000.00 141,320.00 141,320.00 35,605.00 -75,925.00 175.17 4101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 623.00 485.19 485.19 77.884101-4304 Telephone 0.00 137.81 8,000.00 4,462.69 4,462.69 55.784101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 3,537.31 500.00 484.75 484.75 96.954101-4314 Uniforms 0.00 15.25 3,500.00 1,560.00 1,560.00 44.574101-4315 Membership 0.00 1,940.00 2,000.00 2,252.24 2,252.24 112.614101-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 -252.24 17,142.00 15,719.00 15,719.00 91.704101-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 1,423.00 2,234.00 2,234.00 2,234.00 100.004101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 38,442.00 38,442.00 38,442.00 100.004101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 72,441.00 65,639.87 65,639.87 0.00 6,801.13 90.61 Total Community Dev/Planning 1,098,819.00 1,034,241.66 1,034,241.66 35,634.22 28,943.12 97.37 31Page: 148 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 32 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Coastal Permit Auth Grant4104 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4104-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4104-4200 Contract Services 120,272.00 13,132.30 13,132.30 10.924104-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 107,139.70 Total Contract Services 120,272.00 13,132.30 13,132.30 0.00 107,139.70 10.92 4104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Coastal Permit Auth Grant 120,272.00 13,132.30 13,132.30 0.00 107,139.70 10.92 32Page: 149 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 33 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Zoning Ordinance Update4105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4105-4200 Contract Services 250,000.00 30,037.14 30,037.14 12.014105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 219,962.86 Total Zoning Ordinance Update 250,000.00 30,037.14 30,037.14 0.00 219,962.86 12.01 33Page: 150 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 34 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Housing Element Update4108 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4108-4200 Contract Services Total Housing Element Update 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34Page: 151 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 35 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Community Dev/Building4201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4201-4100 Personal Services 489,210.00 488,194.82 488,194.82 99.794201-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 1,015.18 1,500.00 942.53 942.53 62.844201-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 557.47 14,232.00 17,990.21 17,990.21 126.414201-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -3,758.21 12,884.00 13,686.88 13,686.88 106.234201-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 -802.88 600.00 546.56 546.56 91.094201-4117 Shift Differential 0.00 53.44 163,826.00 171,028.37 171,028.37 104.404201-4180 Retirement 0.00 -7,202.37 150.00 146.10 146.10 116.884201-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 29.22 -25.32 300.00 240.00 240.00 80.004201-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 60.00 70,991.00 68,687.34 68,687.34 96.754201-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 2,303.66 7,579.00 7,721.46 7,721.46 101.884201-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 -142.46 15,791.00 15,791.48 15,791.48 100.004201-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 -0.48 Total Personal Services 777,063.00 784,975.75 784,975.75 29.22 -7,941.97 101.02 4201-4200 Contract Services 153,747.00 56,760.54 56,760.54 98.654201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 94,915.90 2,070.56 Total Contract Services 153,747.00 56,760.54 56,760.54 94,915.90 2,070.56 98.65 4201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4,400.00 4,151.52 4,151.52 94.354201-4304 Telephone 0.00 248.48 5,500.00 7,133.97 7,133.97 131.704201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 109.28 -1,743.25 333.00 333.26 333.26 100.084201-4314 Uniforms 0.00 -0.26 2,000.00 970.00 970.00 48.504201-4315 Membership 0.00 1,030.00 1,953.00 3,992.38 3,992.38 204.424201-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 -2,039.38 23,177.00 21,241.00 21,241.00 91.654201-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 1,936.00 1,409.00 1,409.00 1,409.00 100.004201-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 24,861.00 24,861.00 24,861.00 100.004201-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 0.00 49,100.00 49,100.00 49,100.00 100.004201-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 112,733.00 113,192.13 113,192.13 109.28 -568.41 100.50 4201-4900 Depreciation 35Page: 152 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 36 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Community Dev/Building4201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4201-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Community Dev/Building 1,043,543.00 954,928.42 954,928.42 95,054.40 -6,439.82 100.62 36Page: 153 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 37 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4100 Personal Services 394,848.00 410,285.86 410,285.86 103.914202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 -15,437.86 5,000.00 7,534.49 7,534.49 150.694202-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -2,534.49 8,157.00 8,448.74 8,448.74 103.584202-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -291.74 158,296.00 177,308.54 177,308.54 112.014202-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 -19,012.54 51,150.00 67,374.58 67,374.58 131.724202-4180 Retirement 0.00 -16,224.58 64,553.00 73,209.06 73,209.06 113.414202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 -8,656.06 6,837.00 8,408.23 8,408.23 122.984202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 -1,571.23 16,368.00 16,367.98 16,367.98 100.004202-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 0.02 Total Personal Services 705,209.00 768,937.48 768,937.48 0.00 -63,728.48 109.04 4202-4200 Contract Services 105,493.00 141,328.27 141,328.27 229.714202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 100,996.37 -136,831.64 Total Contract Services 105,493.00 141,328.27 141,328.27 100,996.37 -136,831.64 229.71 4202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 19,980.00 8,027.88 8,027.88 40.184202-4304 Telephone 0.00 11,952.12 15,000.00 8,508.13 8,508.13 65.664202-4305 Office Oper Supplies 1,340.50 5,151.37 6,678.00 7,152.20 7,152.20 107.104202-4314 Uniforms 0.00 -474.20 2,186.00 386.00 386.00 66.264202-4315 Membership 1,062.50 737.50 13,548.00 10,798.17 10,798.17 87.504202-4317 Conference/Training 1,056.00 1,693.83 94,005.00 86,163.00 86,163.00 91.664202-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 7,842.00 6,478.00 6,478.00 6,478.00 100.004202-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 19,518.00 18,861.01 18,861.01 100.004202-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 656.99 0.00 281,717.00 281,717.00 281,717.00 100.004202-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 459,110.00 428,091.39 428,091.39 4,115.99 26,902.62 94.14 4202-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4202-5400 Equipment/Furniture 37Page: 154 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 38 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 850.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 850.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 850.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 850.00 0.00 4202-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Public Works Administration 1,270,662.00 1,338,357.14 1,338,357.14 105,112.36 -172,807.50 113.60 38Page: 155 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 39 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Building Maintenance4204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4204-4100 Personal Services 234,260.00 196,260.63 196,260.63 83.784204-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 37,999.37 14,575.00 6,401.58 6,401.58 43.924204-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 8,173.42 23,940.00 23,940.44 23,940.44 100.004204-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.44 66,338.00 45,763.71 45,763.71 68.994204-4180 Retirement 0.00 20,574.29 125.00 130.90 130.90 125.664204-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 26.18 -32.08 54,783.00 45,586.47 45,586.47 83.214204-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 9,196.53 3,813.00 3,276.54 3,276.54 85.934204-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 536.46 7,560.00 7,560.00 7,560.00 100.004204-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 0.00 Total Personal Services 405,394.00 328,920.27 328,920.27 26.18 76,447.55 81.14 4204-4200 Contract Services 140,776.00 131,536.95 131,536.95 82.754204-4201 Contract Serv/Private -15,044.80 24,283.85 225.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 225.00 Total Contract Services 141,001.00 131,536.95 131,536.95 -15,044.80 24,508.85 82.62 4204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 143,526.00 160,528.40 160,528.40 111.854204-4303 Utilities 0.00 -17,002.40 43,950.00 28,034.48 28,034.48 63.794204-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 15,915.52 6,000.00 4,341.91 4,341.91 72.374204-4321 Building Sfty/Security 0.00 1,658.09 5,569.00 5,104.00 5,104.00 91.654204-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 465.00 667.00 667.00 667.00 100.004204-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 16,281.00 16,281.00 16,281.00 100.004204-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 0.00 77,144.00 77,144.00 77,144.00 100.004204-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 293,137.00 292,100.79 292,100.79 0.00 1,036.21 99.65 4204-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4204-5400 Equipment/Furniture 39Page: 156 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 40 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Building Maintenance4204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 600.00 481.14 481.14 80.194204-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 118.86 1,400.00 0.00 0.00 107.144204-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 1,500.00 -100.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 2,000.00 481.14 481.14 1,500.00 18.86 99.06 4204-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Building Maintenance 841,532.00 753,039.15 753,039.15 -13,518.62 102,011.47 87.88 40Page: 157 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 41 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program4210 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4210-4200 Contract Services 9,350.00 0.00 0.00 98.714210-4201 Contract Serv/Private 9,229.80 120.20 Total Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program 9,350.00 0.00 0.00 9,229.80 120.20 98.71 41Page: 158 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 42 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Community Resources4601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4601-4100 Personal Services 325,802.00 338,673.68 338,673.68 103.954601-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 -12,871.68 5,007.00 5,639.09 5,639.09 112.624601-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -632.09 18,523.00 18,523.06 18,523.06 100.004601-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.06 288,834.00 302,151.58 302,151.58 104.614601-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 -13,317.58 208,665.00 215,880.31 215,880.31 103.464601-4180 Retirement 0.00 -7,215.31 2,500.00 2,342.00 2,342.00 112.424601-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 468.40 -310.40 59,861.00 65,458.43 65,458.43 109.354601-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 -5,597.43 8,955.00 10,629.09 10,629.09 118.694601-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 -1,674.09 10,669.00 10,668.48 10,668.48 100.004601-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 0.52 Total Personal Services 928,816.00 969,965.72 969,965.72 468.40 -41,618.12 104.48 4601-4200 Contract Services 77,290.00 78,906.54 78,906.54 105.114601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2,335.00 -3,951.54 237,885.00 235,936.46 235,936.46 100.004601-4221 Contract Rec Classes/Programs 1,948.10 0.44 Total Contract Services 315,175.00 314,843.00 314,843.00 4,283.10 -3,951.10 101.25 4601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,850.00 2,487.00 2,487.00 87.264601-4302 Advertising 0.00 363.00 5,000.00 3,180.27 3,180.27 63.614601-4304 Telephone 0.00 1,819.73 9,500.00 10,093.75 10,093.75 106.344601-4305 Office Oper Supplies 8.36 -602.11 12,000.00 7,254.83 7,254.83 71.984601-4308 Program Materials 1,382.52 3,362.65 2,850.00 2,937.00 2,937.00 103.054601-4315 Membership 0.00 -87.00 5,400.00 5,730.58 5,730.58 106.124601-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 -330.58 6,000.00 3,521.68 3,521.68 91.204601-4328 Hermosa Senior Center Programs 1,950.27 528.05 41,642.00 38,170.00 38,170.00 91.664601-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 3,472.00 35,237.00 35,237.00 35,237.00 100.004601-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 19,827.00 19,827.00 19,827.00 100.004601-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 0.00 91,635.00 91,635.00 91,635.00 100.004601-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 231,941.00 220,074.11 220,074.11 3,341.15 8,525.74 96.32 42Page: 159 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 43 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Community Resources4601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4601-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4601-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4601-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Community Resources 1,475,932.00 1,504,882.83 1,504,882.83 8,092.65 -37,043.48 102.51 43Page: 160 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 44 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Parks6101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 6101-4100 Personal Services 323,153.00 310,818.05 310,818.05 96.186101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 12,334.95 4,500.00 6,172.51 6,172.51 137.176101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -1,672.51 19,959.00 19,958.82 19,958.82 100.006101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.18 70,020.00 66,153.29 66,153.29 94.486101-4180 Retirement 0.00 3,866.71 705.00 633.24 633.24 89.826101-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 71.76 85,454.00 81,594.14 81,594.14 95.486101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 3,859.86 5,098.00 4,939.30 4,939.30 96.896101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 158.70 10,414.00 10,414.98 10,414.98 100.016101-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 -0.98 Total Personal Services 519,303.00 500,684.33 500,684.33 0.00 18,618.67 96.41 6101-4200 Contract Services 285,060.00 282,727.16 282,727.16 99.626101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,250.00 1,082.84 222.00 222.00 222.00 100.006101-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 0.00 Total Contract Services 285,282.00 282,949.16 282,949.16 1,250.00 1,082.84 99.62 6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 317,231.00 228,652.73 228,652.73 72.086101-4303 Utilities 0.00 88,578.27 30,100.00 21,270.09 21,270.09 70.666101-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 8,829.91 21,867.00 21,867.00 21,867.00 100.006101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 27,265.00 27,265.00 27,265.00 100.006101-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 0.00 112,532.00 112,532.00 112,532.00 100.006101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 508,995.00 411,586.82 411,586.82 0.00 97,408.18 80.86 6101-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 10,000.00 10,612.46 10,612.46 106.126101-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 -612.46 Total Equipment/Furniture 10,000.00 10,612.46 10,612.46 0.00 -612.46 106.12 44Page: 161 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 45 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Parks6101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 6101-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Parks 1,323,580.00 1,205,832.77 1,205,832.77 1,250.00 116,497.23 91.20 45Page: 162 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 46 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 PCH Mobility Improvement Project8143 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8143-4200 Contract Services 94,454.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 94,454.00 Total PCH Mobility Improvement Project 94,454.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94,454.00 0.00 46Page: 163 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 47 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Street Improvement Various Locations8186 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8186-4200 Contract Services Total Street Improvement Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47Page: 164 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 48 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Citywide Park Master Plan8538 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8538-4200 Contract Services 42,065.00 0.00 0.00 3.938538-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,654.00 40,411.00 Total Citywide Park Master Plan 42,065.00 0.00 0.00 1,654.00 40,411.00 3.93 48Page: 165 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 49 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation8609 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8609-4200 Contract Services 76,634.00 -161.70 -161.70 0.218609-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 76,795.70 Total Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation 76,634.00 -161.70 -161.70 0.00 76,795.70 0.00 49Page: 166 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 50 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Police Facilities Impovements8614 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8614-4200 Contract Services 143.00 0.00 0.00 99.768614-4201 Contract Serv/Private 142.66 0.34 Total Police Facilities Impovements 143.00 0.00 0.00 142.66 0.34 99.76 50Page: 167 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 51 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 City Yard Renovations8615 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8615-4200 Contract Services 48,077.00 1,518.75 1,518.75 148.908615-4201 Contract Serv/Private 70,066.25 -23,508.00 Total City Yard Renovations 48,077.00 1,518.75 1,518.75 70,066.25 -23,508.00 148.90 51Page: 168 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 52 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Community Center Gen Improvement Phase 38650 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8650-4200 Contract Services 104,626.00 4,650.00 4,650.00 4.448650-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 99,976.00 Total Community Center Gen Improvement Phase 3 104,626.00 4,650.00 4,650.00 0.00 99,976.00 4.44 52Page: 169 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 53 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Council Chambers Improvements8672 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8672-4200 Contract Services 106,209.00 0.00 0.00 0.008672-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 106,209.00 Total Council Chambers Improvements 106,209.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106,209.00 0.00 53Page: 170 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 54 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Police Dept Substation Facility Improvem8674 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8674-4200 Contract Services 4,865.00 2,786.11 2,786.11 99.988674-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2,078.00 0.89 Total Police Dept Substation Facility Improvem 4,865.00 2,786.11 2,786.11 2,078.00 0.89 99.98 54Page: 171 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 55 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 General Fund001 Bard Street Closure8683 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8683-4200 Contract Services 385.00 0.00 0.00 0.008683-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 385.00 Total Bard Street Closure 385.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 385.00 0.00 Total General Fund 40,490,509.00 38,330,384.73 38,330,384.73 817,577.91 1,342,546.36 96.68 55Page: 172 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 56 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund105 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 11,054.00 11,054.00 11,054.00 100.001299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 0.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 11,054.00 11,054.00 11,054.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 56Page: 173 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 57 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund105 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians2601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2601-4100 Personal Services 74,334.00 59,844.37 59,844.37 80.512601-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 14,489.63 5,000.00 1,783.90 1,783.90 35.682601-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 3,216.10 9,002.00 9,002.05 9,002.05 100.002601-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.05 29,655.00 19,589.50 19,589.50 66.062601-4180 Retirement 0.00 10,065.50 19,448.00 17,479.81 17,479.81 89.882601-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 1,968.19 1,239.00 1,024.42 1,024.42 82.682601-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 214.58 3,227.00 3,227.50 3,227.50 100.022601-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 -0.50 Total Personal Services 141,905.00 111,951.55 111,951.55 0.00 29,953.45 78.89 2601-4200 Contract Services 50,300.00 43,780.97 43,780.97 99.592601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 6,310.88 208.15 45,000.00 34,260.79 34,260.79 76.142601-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 10,739.21 Total Contract Services 95,300.00 78,041.76 78,041.76 6,310.88 10,947.36 88.51 2601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 221,999.00 255,640.92 255,640.92 115.152601-4303 Utilities 0.00 -33,641.92 29,100.00 20,239.67 20,239.67 69.552601-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 8,860.33 667.00 667.00 667.00 100.002601-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 50,337.00 50,337.00 50,337.00 100.002601-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 0.00 161,019.00 161,019.00 161,019.00 100.002601-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 463,122.00 487,903.59 487,903.59 0.00 -24,781.59 105.35 Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 700,327.00 677,896.90 677,896.90 6,310.88 16,119.22 97.70 Total Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 711,381.00 688,950.90 688,950.90 6,310.88 16,119.22 97.73 57Page: 174 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 58 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 State Gas Tax Fund115 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 360,763.00 360,763.00 360,763.00 100.001299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 0.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 360,763.00 360,763.00 360,763.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 58Page: 175 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 59 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 State Gas Tax Fund115 Street Maint/Traffic Safety3104 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 22,149.52 22,149.52 0.003104-4309 Maintenance Materials 1,932.78 -24,082.30 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 22,149.52 22,149.52 1,932.78 -24,082.30 0.00 3104-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Street Maint/Traffic Safety 0.00 22,149.52 22,149.52 1,932.78 -24,082.30 0.00 59Page: 176 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 60 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 State Gas Tax Fund115 PCH Mobility Improvement Project8143 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8143-4200 Contract Services 34,581.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 34,581.00 Total PCH Mobility Improvement Project 34,581.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,581.00 0.00 60Page: 177 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 61 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 State Gas Tax Fund115 8th Street Improvements8173 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8173-4200 Contract Services 325,744.00 323,730.85 323,730.85 113.858173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 47,124.00 -45,110.85 Total 8th Street Improvements 325,744.00 323,730.85 323,730.85 47,124.00 -45,110.85 113.85 61Page: 178 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 62 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 State Gas Tax Fund115 Street Improvement Various Locations8186 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8186-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8186-4200 Contract Services 262,164.00 7,217.50 7,217.50 9.208186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 16,900.00 238,046.50 Total Street Improvement Various Locations 262,164.00 7,217.50 7,217.50 16,900.00 238,046.50 9.20 62Page: 179 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 63 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 State Gas Tax Fund115 Annual Street Improvements8190 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8190-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8190-4200 Contract Services 200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008190-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 200,000.00 Total Annual Street Improvements 200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200,000.00 0.00 63Page: 180 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 64 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 State Gas Tax Fund115 Various Street Improvements8192 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8192-4200 Contract Services Total Various Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64Page: 181 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 65 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 State Gas Tax Fund115 *** Title Not Found ***8194 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8194-4200 Contract Services Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total State Gas Tax Fund 1,183,252.00 713,860.87 713,860.87 65,956.78 403,434.35 65.90 65Page: 182 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 66 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 AB939 Fund117 Source Redctn/Recycle Element5301 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 5301-4100 Personal Services 5,502.00 6,111.89 6,111.89 111.085301-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 -609.89 410.00 410.00 410.00 100.005301-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.00 440.00 89.24 89.24 20.285301-4180 Retirement 0.00 350.76 502.00 110.70 110.70 22.055301-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 391.30 92.00 27.86 27.86 30.285301-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 64.14 Total Personal Services 6,946.00 6,749.69 6,749.69 0.00 196.31 97.17 5301-4200 Contract Services 18,500.00 0.00 0.00 100.405301-4201 Contract Serv/Private 18,573.59 -73.59 Total Contract Services 18,500.00 0.00 0.00 18,573.59 -73.59 100.40 5301-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,870.00 1,869.63 1,869.63 99.985301-4315 Membership 0.00 0.37 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1,870.00 1,869.63 1,869.63 0.00 0.37 99.98 Total AB939 Fund 27,316.00 8,619.32 8,619.32 18,573.59 123.09 99.55 66Page: 183 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 67 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Prop A Open Space Fund121 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 20,557.00 20,557.00 20,557.00 100.001299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 0.00 Total Prop A Open Space Fund 20,557.00 20,557.00 20,557.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 67Page: 184 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 68 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Tyco Fund122 Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati8417 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8417-4200 Contract Services Total Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68Page: 185 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 69 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Tyco Fund122 Municipal Pier Structural Assess/Repair8629 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8629-4200 Contract Services 173,075.00 0.00 0.00 3.808629-4201 Contract Serv/Private 6,570.00 166,505.00 Total Municipal Pier Structural Assess /Repair 173,075.00 0.00 0.00 6,570.00 166,505.00 3.80 69Page: 186 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 70 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Tyco Fund122 Municipal Pier Structural Repairs Phase38660 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8660-4200 Contract Services 275,473.00 0.00 0.00 0.008660-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 275,473.00 Total Municipal Pier Structural Repairs Phase3 275,473.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 275,473.00 0.00 70Page: 187 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 71 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Tyco Fund122 14th Street Restroom Construction8692 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8692-4200 Contract Services 750,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008692-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 750,000.00 Total 14th Street Restroom Construction 750,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 750,000.00 0.00 Total Tyco Fund 1,198,548.00 0.00 0.00 6,570.00 1,191,978.00 0.55 71Page: 188 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 72 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Citywide Park Master Plan8538 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8538-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8538-4200 Contract Services 173,410.00 0.00 0.00 0.008538-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 173,410.00 Total Citywide Park Master Plan 173,410.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 173,410.00 0.00 72Page: 189 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 73 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Clark Stadium Bleachers8545 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8545-4200 Contract Services 47,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.008545-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 47,250.00 Total Clark Stadium Bleachers 47,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47,250.00 0.00 73Page: 190 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 74 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Citywide Park Improvements8546 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8546-4200 Contract Services 32,000.00 30,422.97 30,422.97 98.458546-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,080.00 497.03 Total Citywide Park Improvements 32,000.00 30,422.97 30,422.97 1,080.00 497.03 98.45 74Page: 191 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 75 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Fort Lots-O-Fun Park Improvements8547 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8547-4200 Contract Services 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008547-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 50,000.00 Total Fort Lots-O-Fun Park Improvements 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 75Page: 192 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 76 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Community Center, Plaza, and Park Improv8667 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8667-4200 Contract Services Total Community Center, Plaza, and Park Improv 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76Page: 193 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 77 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 City Park Restrooms and Renovation8669 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8669-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8669-4200 Contract Services 63,621.00 0.00 0.00 0.008669-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 63,621.00 Total City Park Restrooms and Renovation 63,621.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 63,621.00 0.00 77Page: 194 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 78 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 14th Street Restroom Construction8692 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8692-4200 Contract Services 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008692-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 50,000.00 Total 14th Street Restroom Construction 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 416,281.00 30,422.97 30,422.97 1,080.00 384,778.03 7.57 78Page: 195 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 79 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund135 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services 1,400.00 1,144.14 1,144.14 81.721219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 255.86 Total Administrative Charges 1,400.00 1,144.14 1,144.14 0.00 255.86 81.72 79Page: 196 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 80 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund135 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,307.00 2,307.00 2,307.00 100.001299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out 0.00 0.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 2,307.00 2,307.00 2,307.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Total Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund 3,707.00 3,451.14 3,451.14 0.00 255.86 93.10 80Page: 197 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 81 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund136 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Lower Pier Admin Exp Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 81Page: 198 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 82 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund137 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services 100.00 511.00 511.00 511.001219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -411.00 Total Contract Services 100.00 511.00 511.00 0.00 -411.00 511.00 Total Myrtle Dist Admin Exp Fund 100.00 511.00 511.00 0.00 -411.00 511.00 82Page: 199 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 83 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund138 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services 100.00 589.51 589.51 589.511219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -489.51 Total Administrative Charges 100.00 589.51 589.51 0.00 -489.51 589.51 83Page: 200 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 84 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund138 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 6,350.00 6,350.00 6,350.00 100.001299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 0.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 6,350.00 6,350.00 6,350.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 6,450.00 6,939.51 6,939.51 0.00 -489.51 107.59 84Page: 201 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 85 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund139 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services 1,503.00 1,074.74 1,074.74 71.511219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 428.26 Total Administrative Charges 1,503.00 1,074.74 1,074.74 0.00 428.26 71.51 85Page: 202 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 86 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund139 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,891.00 1,891.00 1,891.00 100.001299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 0.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 1,891.00 1,891.00 1,891.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Total Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 3,394.00 2,965.74 2,965.74 0.00 428.26 87.38 86Page: 203 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 87 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Community Dev Block Grant140 Fuel Dispenser8601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8601-4200 Contract Services Total Fuel Dispenser 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 87Page: 204 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 88 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Community Dev Block Grant140 ADA Improvements at Various Locations8687 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8687-4200 Contract Services 78,344.00 77,943.73 77,943.73 117.748687-4201 Contract Serv/Private 14,296.52 -13,896.25 Total ADA Improvements at Various Locations 78,344.00 77,943.73 77,943.73 14,296.52 -13,896.25 117.74 88Page: 205 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 89 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Community Dev Block Grant140 ADA Improvements at Various Locations8691 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8691-4200 Contract Services 78,711.00 72,929.22 72,929.22 114.558691-4201 Contract Serv/Private 17,235.15 -11,453.37 Total ADA Improvements at Various Locations 78,711.00 72,929.22 72,929.22 17,235.15 -11,453.37 114.55 89Page: 206 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 90 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Community Dev Block Grant140 ADA Improvement8698 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8698-4200 Contract Services 147,298.00 0.00 0.00 0.008698-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 147,298.00 Total ADA Improvement 147,298.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 147,298.00 0.00 Total Community Dev Block Grant 304,353.00 150,872.95 150,872.95 31,531.67 121,948.38 59.93 90Page: 207 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 91 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Proposition A Fund145 Bus Pass Subsidy3403 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3403-4200 Contract Services 1,700.00 752.00 752.00 44.243403-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 948.00 Total Bus Pass Subsidy 1,700.00 752.00 752.00 0.00 948.00 44.24 91Page: 208 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 92 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Proposition A Fund145 Dial-A-Taxi Program3404 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3404-4200 Contract Services 65,000.00 46,832.34 46,832.34 92.313404-4201 Contract Serv/Private 13,167.66 5,000.00 Total Dial-A-Taxi Program 65,000.00 46,832.34 46,832.34 13,167.66 5,000.00 92.31 92Page: 209 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 93 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Proposition A Fund145 Commuter Express3408 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3408-4100 Personal Services 2,191.00 0.00 0.00 0.003408-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 2,191.00 Total Personal Services 2,191.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,191.00 0.00 3408-4200 Contract Services 36,379.00 0.00 0.00 0.003408-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 36,379.00 Total Contract Services 36,379.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,379.00 0.00 Total Commuter Express 38,570.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,570.00 0.00 93Page: 210 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 94 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Proposition A Fund145 Recreation Transportation3409 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3409-4200 Contract Services 40,000.00 28,314.40 28,314.40 71.003409-4201 Contract Serv/Private 85.60 11,600.00 Total Recreation Transportation 40,000.00 28,314.40 28,314.40 85.60 11,600.00 71.00 94Page: 211 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 95 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Proposition A Fund145 Special Event Shuttle3410 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3410-4200 Contract Services 27,000.00 15,750.00 15,750.00 58.333410-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 11,250.00 Total Special Event Shuttle 27,000.00 15,750.00 15,750.00 0.00 11,250.00 58.33 95Page: 212 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 96 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Proposition A Fund145 After School Program Shuttle3411 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3411-4200 Contract Services 36,000.00 22,800.00 22,800.00 100.003411-4201 Contract Serv/Private 13,200.00 0.00 Total After School Program Shuttle 36,000.00 22,800.00 22,800.00 13,200.00 0.00 100.00 96Page: 213 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 97 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Proposition A Fund145 *** Title Not Found ***3414 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3414-5400 Equipment/Furniture 127,579.00 75,580.99 75,580.99 59.243414-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 51,998.01 Total *** Title Not Found *** 127,579.00 75,580.99 75,580.99 0.00 51,998.01 59.24 97Page: 214 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 98 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Proposition A Fund145 Protective Bollards at Pier Plaza8101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8101-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Protective Bollards at Pier Plaza 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Proposition A Fund 335,849.00 190,029.73 190,029.73 26,453.26 119,366.01 64.46 98Page: 215 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 99 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Proposition C Fund146 Protective Bollards at Pier Plaza8101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8101-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8101-4200 Contract Services 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 40,000.00 Total Protective Bollards at Pier Plaza 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,000.00 0.00 99Page: 216 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 100 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Proposition C Fund146 Bus Stop Improvements8102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8102-4200 Contract Services 330,875.00 0.00 0.00 0.008102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 330,875.00 Total Bus Stop Improvements 330,875.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 330,875.00 0.00 100Page: 217 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 101 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Proposition C Fund146 St Improvements/Various #48193 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8193-4200 Contract Services Total St Improvements/Various #4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Proposition C Fund 370,875.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 370,875.00 0.00 101Page: 218 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 102 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Measure R Fund147 PCH Mobility Improvement Project8143 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8143-4200 Contract Services 243,662.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 243,662.00 Total PCH Mobility Improvement Project 243,662.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 243,662.00 0.00 102Page: 219 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 103 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Measure R Fund147 PCH Traffic Improvements8160 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8160-4200 Contract Services 399,922.00 336,596.87 336,596.87 103.898160-4201 Contract Serv/Private 78,901.13 -15,576.00 Total PCH Traffic Improvements 399,922.00 336,596.87 336,596.87 78,901.13 -15,576.00 103.89 103Page: 220 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 104 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Measure R Fund147 Street Improvement Various Locations8186 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8186-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8186-4200 Contract Services 9,551.00 9,073.45 9,073.45 95.008186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 477.55 Total Street Improvement Various Locations 9,551.00 9,073.45 9,073.45 0.00 477.55 95.00 104Page: 221 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 105 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Measure R Fund147 Strand Bikeway/Walkway Improvments- 35th8188 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8188-4200 Contract Services 102,956.00 0.00 0.00 0.008188-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 102,956.00 Total Strand Bikeway/Walkway Improvments - 35th 102,956.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 102,956.00 0.00 105Page: 222 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 106 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Measure R Fund147 Various Street Improvements8192 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8192-4200 Contract Services Total Various Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106Page: 223 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 107 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Measure R Fund147 St Improvements/Various #48193 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8193-4200 Contract Services Total St Improvements/Various #4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 107Page: 224 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 108 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Measure R Fund147 *** Title Not Found ***8196 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8196-4200 Contract Services Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Measure R Fund 756,091.00 345,670.32 345,670.32 78,901.13 331,519.55 56.15 108Page: 225 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 109 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Measure M148 Street Improvement Various Locations8186 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8186-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8186-4200 Contract Services 306,231.00 104,772.00 104,772.00 34.218186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 201,459.00 Total Street Improvement Various Locations 306,231.00 104,772.00 104,772.00 0.00 201,459.00 34.21 109Page: 226 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 110 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Measure M148 14th St Landscaped Planters8191 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8191-4200 Contract Services Total 14th St Landscaped Planters 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Measure M 306,231.00 104,772.00 104,772.00 0.00 201,459.00 34.21 110Page: 227 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 111 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Measure W Fund149 Various St Improvements #28164 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8164-4200 Contract Services Total Measure W Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 111Page: 228 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 112 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 City Manager1201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1201-4200 Contract Services Total City Manager 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112Page: 229 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 113 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 Green Business Program1221 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1221-4200 Contract Services 20,000.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 100.001221-4201 Contract Serv/Private 7,500.00 0.00 Total Green Business Program 20,000.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 7,500.00 0.00 100.00 113Page: 230 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 114 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 Bulletproof Vest Partnership2111 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2111-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2111-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,124.00 1,894.16 1,894.16 89.182111-4350 Safety Gear 0.00 229.84 Total Bulletproof Vest Partnership 2,124.00 1,894.16 1,894.16 0.00 229.84 89.18 114Page: 231 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 115 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 Body Worn Camera2119 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2119-4200 Contract Services 2,970.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 33.672119-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 1,970.00 Total Body Worn Camera 2,970.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,970.00 33.67 115Page: 232 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 116 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 St Homeland Security Prg- Radio Upgrades2120 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2120-4200 Contract Services 63,640.00 63,640.00 63,640.00 100.002120-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00 Total St Homeland Security Prg- Radio Upgrades 63,640.00 63,640.00 63,640.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 116Page: 233 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 117 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 *** Title Not Found ***2121 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2121-4200 Contract Services 75,404.00 7,752.82 7,752.82 10.282121-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 67,651.18 Total *** Title Not Found *** 75,404.00 7,752.82 7,752.82 0.00 67,651.18 10.28 117Page: 234 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 118 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 Beverage Recycle Grant3102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3102-4200 Contract Services 0.00 1,726.82 1,726.82 0.003102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -1,726.82 Total Beverage Recycle Grant 0.00 1,726.82 1,726.82 0.00 -1,726.82 0.00 118Page: 235 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 119 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 Local Coastal Assistance Grant4107 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4107-4200 Contract Services 52,161.00 66,618.36 66,618.36 108.554107-4201 Contract Serv/Private -10,000.00 -4,457.36 Total Local Coastal Assistance Grant 52,161.00 66,618.36 66,618.36 -10,000.00 -4,457.36 108.55 119Page: 236 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 120 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 *** Title Not Found ***4108 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4108-4200 Contract Services Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120Page: 237 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 121 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program4210 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4210-4200 Contract Services 84,150.00 46,412.02 46,412.02 98.714210-4201 Contract Serv/Private 36,656.18 1,081.80 Total Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program 84,150.00 46,412.02 46,412.02 36,656.18 1,081.80 98.71 121Page: 238 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 122 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 *** Title Not Found ***8103 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8103-4200 Contract Services Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122Page: 239 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 123 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 8th Street Improvements8173 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8173-4200 Contract Services 354,535.00 351,088.39 351,088.39 113.138173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 49,980.00 -46,533.39 Total 8th Street Improvements 354,535.00 351,088.39 351,088.39 49,980.00 -46,533.39 113.13 123Page: 240 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 124 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 St Imp/21st Btwn PCH/Ardmore8184 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8184-4200 Contract Services 71,000.00 60,206.09 60,206.09 122.158184-4201 Contract Serv/Private 26,519.50 -15,725.59 Total St Imp/21st Btwn PCH/Ardmore 71,000.00 60,206.09 60,206.09 26,519.50 -15,725.59 122.15 124Page: 241 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 125 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 ADA Improvements- PCH between 2nd & 21st8185 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8185-4200 Contract Services 205,307.00 188,193.58 188,193.58 108.738185-4201 Contract Serv/Private 35,046.32 -17,932.90 Total ADA Improvements- PCH between 2nd & 21st 205,307.00 188,193.58 188,193.58 35,046.32 -17,932.90 108.73 125Page: 242 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 126 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 Stormwater/Urban Run-off Diversion Proj8542 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8542-4200 Contract Services 3,936,698.00 0.00 0.00 12.598542-4201 Contract Serv/Private 495,758.45 3,440,939.55 Total Stormwater/Urban Run-off Diversion Proj 3,936,698.00 0.00 0.00 495,758.45 3,440,939.55 12.59 126Page: 243 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 127 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 Library Community Needs Assessment8668 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8668-4200 Contract Services 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008668-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 60,000.00 Total Library Community Needs Assessment 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 127Page: 244 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 128 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Grants Fund150 Electric Vehicle, Bicycle Transportation8682 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8682-4200 Contract Services 116,819.00 0.00 0.00 13.108682-4201 Contract Serv/Private 15,300.22 101,518.78 Total Electric Vehicle, Bicycle Transportation 116,819.00 0.00 0.00 15,300.22 101,518.78 13.10 Total Grants Fund 5,044,808.00 801,032.24 801,032.24 656,760.67 3,587,015.09 28.90 128Page: 245 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 129 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund152 Emission Control3701 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3701-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3701-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3,920.00 3,690.00 3,690.00 94.133701-4327 AQMD Incentives 0.00 230.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3,920.00 3,690.00 3,690.00 0.00 230.00 94.13 3701-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3701-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 3,920.00 3,690.00 3,690.00 0.00 230.00 94.13 129Page: 246 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 130 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)153 C.O.P.S. Program2106 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2106-4200 Contract Services 70,743.00 48,038.19 48,038.19 67.912106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 22,704.81 Total Contract Services 70,743.00 48,038.19 48,038.19 0.00 22,704.81 67.91 2106-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2106-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2106-5400 Equipment/Furniture 42,600.00 42,529.87 42,529.87 99.842106-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 70.13 Total Equipment/Furniture 42,600.00 42,529.87 42,529.87 0.00 70.13 99.84 2106-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF) 113,343.00 90,568.06 90,568.06 0.00 22,774.94 79.91 130Page: 247 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 131 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Sewer Fund160 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services 3,846.00 3,845.82 3,845.82 100.001219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.18 Total Administrative Charges 3,846.00 3,845.82 3,845.82 0.00 0.18 100.00 131Page: 248 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 132 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Sewer Fund160 Sewers/Storm Drains3102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3102-4100 Personal Services 93,630.00 89,592.26 89,592.26 95.693102-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 4,037.74 300.00 342.87 342.87 114.293102-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -42.87 6,155.00 6,154.85 6,154.85 100.003102-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.15 16,944.00 13,666.01 13,666.01 80.653102-4180 Retirement 0.00 3,277.99 0.00 12.49 12.49 0.003102-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 -12.49 15,671.00 14,427.83 14,427.83 92.073102-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 1,243.17 1,467.00 1,403.15 1,403.15 95.653102-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 63.85 1,945.00 1,944.49 1,944.49 99.973102-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 0.51 Total Personal Services 136,112.00 127,543.95 127,543.95 0.00 8,568.05 93.71 3102-4200 Contract Services 243,976.00 208,835.82 208,835.82 87.843102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 5,460.64 29,679.54 4,376.00 2,625.00 2,625.00 59.993102-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 1,751.00 Total Contract Services 248,352.00 211,460.82 211,460.82 5,460.64 31,430.54 87.34 3102-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 894.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4303 Utilities 0.00 894.00 7,600.00 1,185.27 1,185.27 15.603102-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 6,414.73 267.00 267.00 267.00 100.003102-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 29,446.00 29,446.00 29,446.00 100.003102-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 0.00 24,354.00 24,354.00 24,354.00 100.003102-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 62,561.00 55,252.27 55,252.27 0.00 7,308.73 88.32 3102-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3102-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Sewers/Storm Drains 447,025.00 394,257.04 394,257.04 5,460.64 47,307.32 89.42 132Page: 249 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 133 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Sewer Fund160 Used Oil Block Grant3105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3105-4200 Contract Services 15,243.00 0.00 0.00 0.003105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 15,243.00 Total Used Oil Block Grant 15,243.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,243.00 0.00 133Page: 250 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 134 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Sewer Fund160 Sewer Improvements Various Locations8416 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8416-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8416-4200 Contract Services 2,490,147.00 2,259,346.58 2,259,346.58 90.738416-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 230,800.42 Total Sewer Improvements Various Locations 2,490,147.00 2,259,346.58 2,259,346.58 0.00 230,800.42 90.73 134Page: 251 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 135 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Sewer Fund160 Annual Sewer Improvements8421 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8421-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8421-4200 Contract Services 250,000.00 115,839.88 115,839.88 81.098421-4201 Contract Serv/Private 86,885.12 47,275.00 Total Annual Sewer Improvements 250,000.00 115,839.88 115,839.88 86,885.12 47,275.00 81.09 135Page: 252 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 136 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Sewer Fund160 Sewer Improvements8423 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8423-4200 Contract Services Total Sewer Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 136Page: 253 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 137 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Sewer Fund160 14th Street Beach Restroom Rehab8692 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8692-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8692-4200 Contract Services 199,111.00 0.00 0.00 0.008692-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 199,111.00 Total 14th Street Beach Restroom Rehab 199,111.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 199,111.00 0.00 Total Sewer Fund 3,405,372.00 2,773,289.32 2,773,289.32 92,345.76 539,736.92 84.15 137Page: 254 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 138 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Storm Drains Fund161 Storm Drain3109 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3109-4100 Personal Services 85,577.00 84,376.43 84,376.43 98.603109-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 1,200.57 300.00 330.29 330.29 110.103109-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -30.29 6,255.00 6,255.00 6,255.00 100.003109-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.00 13,827.00 9,736.63 9,736.63 70.423109-4180 Retirement 0.00 4,090.37 0.00 12.49 12.49 0.003109-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 -12.49 14,033.00 13,371.26 13,371.26 95.283109-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 661.74 1,351.00 1,328.16 1,328.16 98.313109-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 22.84 2,067.00 2,065.50 2,065.50 99.933109-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits/OPEB 0.00 1.50 Total Personal Services 123,410.00 117,475.76 117,475.76 0.00 5,934.24 95.19 3109-4200 Contract Services 146,796.00 51,188.66 51,188.66 94.303109-4201 Contract Serv/Private 87,247.22 8,360.12 9,594.00 8,539.00 8,539.00 89.003109-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 1,055.00 Total Contract Services 156,390.00 59,727.66 59,727.66 87,247.22 9,415.12 93.98 3109-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 5,000.00 113.00 113.00 2.263109-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 4,887.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 100.003109-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 0.00 37,476.00 37,476.00 37,476.00 100.003109-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 0.00 16,567.00 16,567.00 16,567.00 100.003109-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 59,443.00 54,556.00 54,556.00 0.00 4,887.00 91.78 3109-5400 Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 25,317.34 -25,317.34 Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,317.34 -25,317.34 0.00 Total Storm Drain 339,243.00 231,759.42 231,759.42 112,564.56 -5,080.98 101.50 138Page: 255 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 139 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Storm Drains Fund161 Hermosa Ave Green Street8164 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8164-4200 Contract Services 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008164-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 250,000.00 Total Hermosa Ave Green Street 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250,000.00 0.00 139Page: 256 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 140 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Storm Drains Fund161 Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati8417 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8417-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8417-4200 Contract Services 1,000,000.00 17,377.00 17,377.00 1.748417-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 982,623.00 Total Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati 1,000,000.00 17,377.00 17,377.00 0.00 982,623.00 1.74 140Page: 257 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 141 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Storm Drains Fund161 16th Street Storm Drain Trash Capture Pr8419 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8419-4200 Contract Services 120,000.00 2,675.25 2,675.25 2.238419-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 117,324.75 Total 16th Street Storm Drain Trash Capture Pr 120,000.00 2,675.25 2,675.25 0.00 117,324.75 2.23 141Page: 258 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 142 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Storm Drains Fund161 Annual Storm Drain Improvements8422 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8422-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8422-4200 Contract Services 200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008422-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 200,000.00 Total Annual Storm Drain Improvements 200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200,000.00 0.00 142Page: 259 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 143 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Storm Drains Fund161 Sewer Improvements8423 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8423-4200 Contract Services Total Sewer Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 143Page: 260 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 144 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Storm Drains Fund161 Sewer Improvements/Various Locations8424 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8424-4200 Contract Services Total Sewer Improvements/Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Storm Drains Fund 1,909,243.00 251,811.67 251,811.67 112,564.56 1,544,866.77 19.08 144Page: 261 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 145 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170 Special Investigations2103 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2103-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2103-5400 Equipment/Furniture 57,218.00 0.00 0.00 0.002103-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 57,218.00 Total Special Investigations 57,218.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57,218.00 0.00 145Page: 262 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 146 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170 Police K-9 Program2105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2105-4200 Contract Services 1,500.00 1,112.27 1,112.27 190.222105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,741.09 -1,353.36 Total Contract Services 1,500.00 1,112.27 1,112.27 1,741.09 -1,353.36 190.22 2105-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 722.00 180.04 180.04 24.942105-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 541.96 3,000.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 58.332105-4317 Conference/Training 250.00 1,250.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3,722.00 1,680.04 1,680.04 250.00 1,791.96 51.85 2105-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2105-5400 Equipment/Furniture 600.00 158.90 158.90 66.852105-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 242.20 198.90 2,900.00 2,989.11 2,989.11 103.072105-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 -89.11 Total Equipment/Furniture 3,500.00 3,148.01 3,148.01 242.20 109.79 96.86 Total Police K-9 Program 8,722.00 5,940.32 5,940.32 2,233.29 548.39 93.71 146Page: 263 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 147 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170 Mounted Patrol Unit2116 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2116-4200 Contract Services Total Mounted Patrol Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 65,940.00 5,940.32 5,940.32 2,233.29 57,766.39 12.40 147Page: 264 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 148 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Fire Protection Fund180 Fire Protection2202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2202-4200 Contract Services 43,062.00 43,062.00 43,062.00 100.002202-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.09 -0.09 Total Fire Protection Fund 43,062.00 43,062.00 43,062.00 0.09 -0.09 100.00 148Page: 265 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 149 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 RTI Undersea Cable190 Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati8417 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8417-4200 Contract Services Total Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 149Page: 266 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 150 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 RTI Undersea Cable190 14Th. St. Beach Restroom Rehabilitation8631 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8631-4200 Contract Services Total 14Th. St. Beach Restroom Rehabilitation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150Page: 267 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 151 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 RTI Undersea Cable190 Parking Lot A Improvements8695 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8695-4200 Contract Services 482,260.00 0.00 0.00 0.008695-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 482,260.00 Total RTI Undersea Cable 482,260.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 482,260.00 0.00 151Page: 268 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 152 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 RTI Tidelands191 Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati8417 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8417-4200 Contract Services Total Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 152Page: 269 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 153 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 RTI Tidelands191 Municipal Pier Structural Assess/Repair8629 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8629-4200 Contract Services 240,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008629-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 240,000.00 Total Municipal Pier Structural Assess /Repair 240,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 240,000.00 0.00 153Page: 270 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 154 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 RTI Tidelands191 14th Street Restroom Construction8692 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8692-4200 Contract Services Total 14th Street Restroom Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total RTI Tidelands 240,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 240,000.00 0.00 154Page: 271 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 155 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds201 Legal Settlements- E&B Resources1220 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1220-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1220-6700 Interest 310,212.00 310,081.25 310,081.25 99.961220-6701 Interest 0.00 130.75 Total Interest 310,212.00 310,081.25 310,081.25 0.00 130.75 99.96 1220-6800 Principal 480,000.00 480,000.00 480,000.00 100.001220-6801 Principal Payment 0.00 0.00 Total Principal 480,000.00 480,000.00 480,000.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 1220-6900 Lease Payments Total Lease Payments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds 790,212.00 790,081.25 790,081.25 0.00 130.75 99.98 155Page: 272 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 156 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 City Manager1201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1201-4200 Contract Services Total City Manager 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 156Page: 273 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 157 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Fire Protection2202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2202-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Fire Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 157Page: 274 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 158 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 *** Title Not Found ***8103 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8103-4200 Contract Services Total *** Title Not Found *** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 158Page: 275 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 159 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore8129 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8129-4200 Contract Services Total Pier Avenue/PCH to Ardmore 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 159Page: 276 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 160 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 PCH Mobility Improvement Project8143 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8143-4200 Contract Services 263,437.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 263,437.00 Total PCH Mobility Improvement Project 263,437.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 263,437.00 0.00 160Page: 277 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 161 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 8th Street Improvements8173 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8173-4200 Contract Services 307,143.00 174,990.40 174,990.40 56.978173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 132,152.60 Total 8th Street Improvements 307,143.00 174,990.40 174,990.40 0.00 132,152.60 56.97 161Page: 278 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 162 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Various Street Improvements8192 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8192-4200 Contract Services Total Various Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 162Page: 279 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 163 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati8417 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8417-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8417-4200 Contract Services 80,000.00 36,410.30 36,410.30 100.008417-4201 Contract Serv/Private 43,589.70 0.00 Total Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati 80,000.00 36,410.30 36,410.30 43,589.70 0.00 100.00 163Page: 280 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 164 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Stormwater/Urban Run-Off Diversion Proj8542 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8542-4200 Contract Services 618,038.00 0.00 0.00 0.228542-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,370.20 616,667.80 Total Stormwater/Urban Run-Off Diversion Proj 618,038.00 0.00 0.00 1,370.20 616,667.80 0.22 164Page: 281 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 165 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Feasibility. Greenbelt Path8544 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8544-4200 Contract Services 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008544-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 10,000.00 Total Feasibility. Greenbelt Path 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 165Page: 282 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 166 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Citywide Park Improvements8546 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8546-4200 Contract Services 18,000.00 15,916.82 15,916.82 97.388546-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,611.25 471.93 Total Citywide Park Improvements 18,000.00 15,916.82 15,916.82 1,611.25 471.93 97.38 166Page: 283 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 167 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Clark Field Electrical8602 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8602-4200 Contract Services Total Clark Field Electrical 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 167Page: 284 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 168 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Pub Works Yard Relocation8608 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8608-4200 Contract Services 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008608-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 60,000.00 Total Pub Works Yard Relocation 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 168Page: 285 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 169 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation8609 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8609-4200 Contract Services 542,076.00 73,914.54 73,914.54 16.738609-4201 Contract Serv/Private 16,769.32 451,392.14 Total Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation 542,076.00 73,914.54 73,914.54 16,769.32 451,392.14 16.73 169Page: 286 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 170 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Police Facilities Improvements8614 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8614-4200 Contract Services 53,546.00 6,965.21 6,965.21 17.218614-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2,247.48 44,333.31 Total Police Facilities Improvements 53,546.00 6,965.21 6,965.21 2,247.48 44,333.31 17.21 170Page: 287 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 171 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 New Corporate Yard Facility8615 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8615-4200 Contract Services 1,318,750.00 5,251.79 5,251.79 8.738615-4201 Contract Serv/Private 109,820.00 1,203,678.21 Total New Corporate Yard Facility 1,318,750.00 5,251.79 5,251.79 109,820.00 1,203,678.21 8.73 171Page: 288 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 172 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Community Center Gen Improv- Phase III8650 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8650-4200 Contract Services 143,930.00 47,195.00 47,195.00 34.008650-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,740.00 94,995.00 Total Community Center Gen Improv- Phase III 143,930.00 47,195.00 47,195.00 1,740.00 94,995.00 34.00 172Page: 289 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 173 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs8660 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8660-4200 Contract Services 259,711.00 14,900.00 14,900.00 5.748660-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 244,811.00 Total Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs 259,711.00 14,900.00 14,900.00 0.00 244,811.00 5.74 173Page: 290 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 174 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 City Park Restroom Renovations8669 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8669-4100 Personal Services Total Personal Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8669-4200 Contract Services 1,431,999.00 0.00 0.00 1.228669-4201 Contract Serv/Private 17,520.00 1,414,479.00 Total City Park Restroom Renovations 1,431,999.00 0.00 0.00 17,520.00 1,414,479.00 1.22 174Page: 291 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 175 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Tree Well Grates8670 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8670-4200 Contract Services 51,068.00 0.00 0.00 0.008670-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 51,068.00 Total Tree Well Grates 51,068.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51,068.00 0.00 175Page: 292 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 176 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Electrical Vehicle & Bicycle Transportat8682 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8682-4200 Contract Services 47,186.00 0.00 0.00 0.008682-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 47,186.00 Total Electrical Vehicle & Bicycle Transportat 47,186.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47,186.00 0.00 176Page: 293 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 177 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Bard Street Closure8683 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8683-4200 Contract Services 44,086.00 0.00 0.00 0.008683-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 44,086.00 Total Bard Street Closure 44,086.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44,086.00 0.00 177Page: 294 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 178 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Emergency Op Center Renovations8684 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8684-4200 Contract Services 192,880.00 0.00 0.00 0.008684-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 192,880.00 Total Emergency Op Center Renovations 192,880.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 192,880.00 0.00 178Page: 295 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 179 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Clark Building Renovations8689 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8689-4200 Contract Services 420,072.00 0.00 0.00 0.008689-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 420,072.00 Total Clark Building Renovations 420,072.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 420,072.00 0.00 179Page: 296 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 180 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 14th Street Restroom Construction8692 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8692-4200 Contract Services Total 14th Street Restroom Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 180Page: 297 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 181 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Community Theater Needs Assessment8693 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8693-4200 Contract Services 79,295.00 57,297.75 57,297.75 100.008693-4201 Contract Serv/Private 21,997.25 0.00 Total Community Theater Needs Assessment 79,295.00 57,297.75 57,297.75 21,997.25 0.00 100.00 181Page: 298 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 182 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Parking Structure (Lot C) Assessment8694 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8694-4200 Contract Services 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008694-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 40,000.00 Total Parking Structure (Lot C) Assessment 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,000.00 0.00 182Page: 299 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 183 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Parking Lot A Improvements8695 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8695-4200 Contract Services 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008695-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 150,000.00 Total Parking Lot A Improvements 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 0.00 183Page: 300 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 184 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 Police Station Basement Restroom Improve8696 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8696-4200 Contract Services 33,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008696-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 33,000.00 Total Police Station Basement Restroom Improve 33,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,000.00 0.00 184Page: 301 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 185 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Capital Improvement Fund301 *** Title Not Found ***8699 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8699-4200 Contract Services 65,000.00 50,863.66 50,863.66 80.528699-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,474.00 12,662.34 Total *** Title Not Found *** 65,000.00 50,863.66 50,863.66 1,474.00 12,662.34 80.52 Total Capital Improvement Fund 6,229,217.00 483,705.47 483,705.47 218,139.20 5,527,372.33 11.27 185Page: 302 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 186 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Insurance Fund705 City Attorney Litigation1133 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1133-4200 Contract Services 130,000.00 160,648.81 160,648.81 125.881133-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2,996.65 -33,645.46 Total City Attorney Litigation 130,000.00 160,648.81 160,648.81 2,996.65 -33,645.46 125.88 186Page: 303 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 187 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Insurance Fund705 Liability Insurance1209 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1209-4100 Personal Services 40,942.00 40,598.43 40,598.43 99.161209-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 343.57 0.00 117.71 117.71 0.001209-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -117.71 426.00 426.01 426.01 100.001209-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.01 14,875.00 15,599.84 15,599.84 104.871209-4180 Retirement 0.00 -724.84 8,315.00 8,042.94 8,042.94 96.731209-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 272.06 636.00 632.00 632.00 99.371209-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 4.00 Total Personal Services 65,194.00 65,416.93 65,416.93 0.00 -222.93 100.34 1209-4200 Contract Services 672,827.00 678,426.47 678,426.47 100.921209-4201 Contract Serv/Private 600.00 -6,199.47 Total Contract Services 672,827.00 678,426.47 678,426.47 600.00 -6,199.47 100.92 1209-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 265,657.00 245,781.28 245,781.28 92.521209-4324 Claims/Settlements 0.00 19,875.72 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 265,657.00 245,781.28 245,781.28 0.00 19,875.72 92.52 Total Liability Insurance 1,003,678.00 989,624.68 989,624.68 600.00 13,453.32 98.66 187Page: 304 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 188 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Insurance Fund705 Auto/Property/Bonds1210 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1210-4200 Contract Services 45,635.00 45,635.00 45,635.00 100.001210-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.00 Total Contract Services 45,635.00 45,635.00 45,635.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 1210-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001210-4324 Claims/Settlements 0.00 10,000.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 Total Auto/Property/Bonds 55,635.00 45,635.00 45,635.00 0.00 10,000.00 82.03 188Page: 305 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 189 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Insurance Fund705 Unemployment1215 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1215-4100 Personal Services 10,000.00 7,628.00 7,628.00 76.281215-4186 Unemployment Claims 0.00 2,372.00 Total Unemployment 10,000.00 7,628.00 7,628.00 0.00 2,372.00 76.28 189Page: 306 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 190 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Insurance Fund705 Workers' Compensation1217 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1217-4100 Personal Services 40,942.00 40,598.71 40,598.71 99.161217-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 343.29 0.00 117.72 117.72 0.001217-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -117.72 426.00 426.03 426.03 100.011217-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.03 14,875.00 15,599.95 15,599.95 104.871217-4180 Retirement 0.00 -724.95 8,315.00 8,042.70 8,042.70 96.731217-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 272.30 636.00 631.84 631.84 99.351217-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 4.16 Total Personal Services 65,194.00 65,416.95 65,416.95 0.00 -222.95 100.34 1217-4200 Contract Services 350,530.00 327,827.23 327,827.23 93.521217-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 22,702.77 Total Contract Services 350,530.00 327,827.23 327,827.23 0.00 22,702.77 93.52 1217-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 100.00 13.55 13.55 13.551217-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 86.45 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001217-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 1,000.00 981,000.00 757,408.40 757,408.40 77.211217-4324 Claims/Settlements 0.00 223,591.60 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 982,100.00 757,421.95 757,421.95 0.00 224,678.05 77.12 Total Workers' Compensation 1,397,824.00 1,150,666.13 1,150,666.13 0.00 247,157.87 82.32 190Page: 307 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 191 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Insurance Fund705 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 93,145.00 93,145.00 0.001299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 -93,145.00 Total Interfund Transfers Out 0.00 93,145.00 93,145.00 0.00 -93,145.00 0.00 Total Insurance Fund 2,597,137.00 2,447,347.62 2,447,347.62 3,596.65 146,192.73 94.37 191Page: 308 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 192 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 City Clerk1121 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1121-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total City Clerk 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 192Page: 309 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 193 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 City Treasurer1141 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1141-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total City Treasurer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 193Page: 310 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 194 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 City Manager1201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1201-4200 Contract Services 7,000.00 6,267.48 6,267.48 552.531201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 32,409.51 -31,676.99 Total Contract Services 7,000.00 6,267.48 6,267.48 32,409.51 -31,676.99 552.53 1201-5400 Equipment/Furniture 1,957.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 1,957.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 1,957.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,957.00 0.00 Total City Manager 8,957.00 6,267.48 6,267.48 32,409.51 -29,719.99 431.81 194Page: 311 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 195 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Finance Administration1202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1202-5400 Equipment/Furniture 4,940.00 0.00 0.00 0.001202-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 4,940.00 Total Finance Administration 4,940.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,940.00 0.00 195Page: 312 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 196 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Human Resources1203 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1203-5400 Equipment/Furniture 1,558.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 1,558.00 Total Human Resources 1,558.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,558.00 0.00 196Page: 313 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 197 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Finance Cashier1204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1204-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1204-5400 Equipment/Furniture 3,322.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 3,322.00 Total Finance Cashier 3,322.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,322.00 0.00 197Page: 314 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 198 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Information Technology1206 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1206-4200 Contract Services 639,034.00 496,216.75 496,216.75 84.401206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 43,130.54 99,686.71 Total Contract Services 639,034.00 496,216.75 496,216.75 43,130.54 99,686.71 84.40 1206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 35,000.00 30,893.95 30,893.95 88.271206-4304 Telephone 0.00 4,106.05 15,000.00 2,689.15 2,689.15 17.931206-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 12,310.85 78.00 78.00 78.00 100.001206-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 50,078.00 33,661.10 33,661.10 0.00 16,416.90 67.22 1206-4900 Depreciation 42,556.00 0.00 0.00 0.001206-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 42,556.00 Total Depreciation 42,556.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42,556.00 0.00 1206-5400 Equipment/Furniture 6,160.00 598.57 598.57 28.481206-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 1,155.89 4,405.54 9,626.00 15,251.40 15,251.40 158.601206-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 15.68 -5,641.08 0.00 22,399.61 22,399.61 0.001206-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 -22,399.61 Total Equipment/Furniture 15,786.00 38,249.58 38,249.58 1,171.57 -23,635.15 249.72 Total Information Technology 747,454.00 568,127.43 568,127.43 44,302.11 135,024.46 81.94 198Page: 315 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 199 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 General Appropriations1208 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1208-4200 Contract Services 10,074.00 11,291.95 11,291.95 156.431208-4201 Contract Serv/Private 4,466.94 -5,684.89 Total Contract Services 10,074.00 11,291.95 11,291.95 4,466.94 -5,684.89 156.43 1208-4900 Depreciation 6,956.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 6,956.00 Total Depreciation 6,956.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,956.00 0.00 1208-5400 Equipment/Furniture 28,380.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 28,380.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 28,380.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,380.00 0.00 Total General Appropriations 45,410.00 11,291.95 11,291.95 4,466.94 29,651.11 34.70 199Page: 316 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 200 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Police2101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2101-4200 Contract Services 37,008.00 25,093.02 25,093.02 115.582101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 17,682.19 -5,767.21 Total Contract Services 37,008.00 25,093.02 25,093.02 17,682.19 -5,767.21 115.58 2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 72,262.00 64,136.98 64,136.98 89.602101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 611.86 7,513.16 46,465.00 25,936.48 25,936.48 55.822101-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 20,528.52 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 118,727.00 90,073.46 90,073.46 611.86 28,041.68 76.38 2101-4900 Depreciation 50,725.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 50,725.00 165,858.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 165,858.00 Total Depreciation 216,583.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 216,583.00 0.00 2101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 25,503.00 1,312.32 1,312.32 5.152101-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 24,190.68 14,313.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 14,313.00 381,095.00 178,387.49 178,387.49 105.872101-5403 Vehicles 225,084.66 -22,377.15 268,860.00 5,521.74 5,521.74 3.082101-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 2,760.00 260,578.26 Total Equipment/Furniture 689,771.00 185,221.55 185,221.55 227,844.66 276,704.79 59.88 2101-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Police 1,062,089.00 300,388.03 300,388.03 246,138.71 515,562.26 51.46 200Page: 317 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 201 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians2601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2601-4200 Contract Services 7,200.00 3,073.17 3,073.17 42.682601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 4,126.83 Total Contract Services 7,200.00 3,073.17 3,073.17 0.00 4,126.83 42.68 2601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3,723.00 1,150.77 1,150.77 30.912601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 2,572.23 1,300.00 141.10 141.10 10.852601-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,158.90 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 5,023.00 1,291.87 1,291.87 0.00 3,731.13 25.72 2601-4900 Depreciation 7,942.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 7,942.00 11,036.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 11,036.00 Total Depreciation 18,978.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,978.00 0.00 2601-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 31,201.00 4,365.04 4,365.04 0.00 26,835.96 13.99 201Page: 318 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 202 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Sewers/Storm Drains3102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3102-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3102-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 1,000.00 4,500.00 726.92 726.92 16.153102-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 3,773.08 1,500.00 -653.27 -653.27 43.553102-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 2,153.27 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 7,000.00 73.65 73.65 0.00 6,926.35 1.05 3102-4900 Depreciation 14,052.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 14,052.00 6,391.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 6,391.00 Total Depreciation 20,443.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,443.00 0.00 3102-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Sewers/Storm Drains 27,443.00 73.65 73.65 0.00 27,369.35 0.27 202Page: 319 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 203 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Street Maint/Traffic Safety3104 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 7,520.00 7,291.94 7,291.94 96.973104-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 228.06 5,977.00 3,399.44 3,399.44 56.883104-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 2,577.56 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 13,497.00 10,691.38 10,691.38 0.00 2,805.62 79.21 3104-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3104-5400 Equipment/Furniture 0.00 222.17 222.17 0.003104-5403 Vehicles 0.00 -222.17 Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 222.17 222.17 0.00 -222.17 0.00 Total Street Maint/Traffic Safety 13,497.00 10,913.55 10,913.55 0.00 2,583.45 80.86 203Page: 320 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 204 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Storm Drains3109 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3109-4200 Contract Services 7,000.00 283.50 283.50 4.053109-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 6,716.50 Total Contract Services 7,000.00 283.50 283.50 0.00 6,716.50 4.05 3109-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 600.00 6,000.00 433.25 433.25 7.223109-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 5,566.75 1,430.00 478.83 478.83 33.483109-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 951.17 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 8,030.00 912.08 912.08 0.00 7,117.92 11.36 3109-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3109-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Storm Drains 15,030.00 1,195.58 1,195.58 0.00 13,834.42 7.95 204Page: 321 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 205 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Community Services3302 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3302-4200 Contract Services 3,036.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 3,036.00 Total Contract Services 3,036.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,036.00 0.00 3302-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 20,000.00 16,642.16 16,642.16 83.213302-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 3,357.84 8,000.00 5,389.33 5,389.33 79.873302-4311 Auto Maintenance 1,000.00 1,610.67 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 28,000.00 22,031.49 22,031.49 1,000.00 4,968.51 82.26 3302-4900 Depreciation 18,124.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 18,124.00 25,175.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 25,175.00 Total Depreciation 43,299.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43,299.00 0.00 3302-5400 Equipment/Furniture 59,991.00 29,350.67 29,350.67 97.893302-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 29,376.60 1,263.73 113,121.00 37,866.51 37,866.51 59.793302-5403 Vehicles 29,766.05 45,488.44 9,460.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 9,460.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 182,572.00 67,217.18 67,217.18 59,142.65 56,212.17 69.21 Total Community Services 256,907.00 89,248.67 89,248.67 60,142.65 107,515.68 58.15 205Page: 322 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 206 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Community Dev/Planning4101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2,431.00 0.00 0.00 0.004101-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 2,431.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.004101-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 500.00 Total Community Dev/Planning 2,931.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,931.00 0.00 206Page: 323 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 207 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Community Dev/Building4201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4201-4200 Contract Services 271,834.00 209,166.60 209,166.60 119.454201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 115,548.26 -52,880.86 Total Contract Services 271,834.00 209,166.60 209,166.60 115,548.26 -52,880.86 119.45 4201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,105.00 54.57 54.57 4.944201-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 1,050.43 1,670.00 999.23 999.23 59.834201-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 670.77 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,775.00 1,053.80 1,053.80 0.00 1,721.20 37.97 4201-4900 Depreciation 3,321.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 3,321.00 Total Depreciation 3,321.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,321.00 0.00 4201-5400 Equipment/Furniture 49,242.00 1,076.58 1,076.58 7.554201-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 2,640.46 45,524.96 1,919.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 1,919.00 215.00 214.62 214.62 99.824201-5403 Vehicles 0.00 0.38 Total Equipment/Furniture 51,376.00 1,291.20 1,291.20 2,640.46 47,444.34 7.65 Total Community Dev/Building 329,306.00 211,511.60 211,511.60 118,188.72 -394.32 100.12 207Page: 324 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 208 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4200 Contract Services 8,331.00 5,111.35 5,111.35 69.734202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 698.00 2,521.65 Total Contract Services 8,331.00 5,111.35 5,111.35 698.00 2,521.65 69.73 4202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,877.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 1,877.00 2,200.00 563.45 563.45 25.614202-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,636.55 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4,077.00 563.45 563.45 0.00 3,513.55 13.82 4202-4900 Depreciation 5,560.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 5,560.00 3,344.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 3,344.00 Total Depreciation 8,904.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,904.00 0.00 4202-5400 Equipment/Furniture 3,458.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 3,458.00 49,715.00 4,871.68 4,871.68 9.804202-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 44,843.32 Total Equipment/Furniture 53,173.00 4,871.68 4,871.68 0.00 48,301.32 9.16 Total Public Works Administration 74,485.00 10,546.48 10,546.48 698.00 63,240.52 15.10 208Page: 325 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 209 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Building Maintenance4204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4204-4200 Contract Services 191,105.00 37,605.32 37,605.32 19.964204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 534.99 152,964.69 Total Contract Services 191,105.00 37,605.32 37,605.32 534.99 152,964.69 19.96 4204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,190.00 2,738.12 2,738.12 125.034204-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 -548.12 1,000.00 861.39 861.39 86.144204-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 138.61 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3,190.00 3,599.51 3,599.51 0.00 -409.51 112.84 4204-4900 Depreciation 2,063.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 2,063.00 12,935.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 12,935.00 Total Depreciation 14,998.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,998.00 0.00 4204-5400 Equipment/Furniture 41,714.00 41,713.95 41,713.95 100.184204-5403 Vehicles 77.01 -76.96 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 15,000.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 56,714.00 41,713.95 41,713.95 77.01 14,923.04 73.69 4204-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Building Maintenance 266,007.00 82,918.78 82,918.78 612.00 182,476.22 31.40 209Page: 326 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 210 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Equipment Service4206 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4206-4100 Personal Services 164,554.00 162,899.75 162,899.75 98.994206-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 1,654.25 6,000.00 3,912.32 3,912.32 65.214206-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 2,087.68 2,602.00 2,601.74 2,601.74 99.994206-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.26 56,918.00 57,700.89 57,700.89 101.384206-4180 Retirement 0.00 -782.89 49,573.00 47,072.28 47,072.28 94.964206-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 2,500.72 2,473.00 2,479.88 2,479.88 100.284206-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 -6.88 6,101.00 6,098.47 6,098.47 99.964206-4190 Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 0.00 2.53 Total Personal Services 288,221.00 282,765.33 282,765.33 0.00 5,455.67 98.11 4206-4200 Contract Services 6,259.00 2,052.75 2,052.75 32.804206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 4,206.25 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.004206-4251 Contract Services/Govt 0.00 250.00 Total Contract Services 6,509.00 2,052.75 2,052.75 0.00 4,456.25 31.54 4206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3,700.00 2,690.49 2,690.49 72.724206-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 1,009.51 3,000.00 3,544.30 3,544.30 118.144206-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 -544.30 1,300.00 469.27 469.27 36.104206-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 830.73 67,427.00 67,427.00 67,427.00 100.004206-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 75,427.00 74,131.06 74,131.06 0.00 1,295.94 98.28 4206-4900 Depreciation 425.00 0.00 0.00 0.004206-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 425.00 Total Depreciation 425.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 425.00 0.00 4206-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Equipment Service 370,582.00 358,949.14 358,949.14 0.00 11,632.86 96.86 210Page: 327 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 211 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Community Resources4601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4601-4200 Contract Services 2,945.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 2,945.00 Total Contract Services 2,945.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,945.00 0.00 4601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 800.00 824.66 824.66 103.084601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 -24.66 91.00 14.00 14.00 15.384601-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 77.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 891.00 838.66 838.66 0.00 52.34 94.13 4601-4900 Depreciation 9,159.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 9,159.00 Total Depreciation 9,159.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,159.00 0.00 4601-5400 Equipment/Furniture 9,460.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 9,460.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 9,460.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,460.00 0.00 Total Community Resources 22,455.00 838.66 838.66 0.00 21,616.34 3.73 211Page: 328 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 212 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Parks6101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4,990.00 3,575.33 3,575.33 71.656101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 1,414.67 2,500.00 2,452.82 2,452.82 98.116101-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 47.18 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 7,490.00 6,028.15 6,028.15 0.00 1,461.85 80.48 6101-4900 Depreciation 11,841.00 0.00 0.00 0.006101-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 11,841.00 Total Depreciation 11,841.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,841.00 0.00 6101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 41,391.00 41,390.81 41,390.81 100.006101-5403 Vehicles 0.00 0.19 Total Equipment/Furniture 41,391.00 41,390.81 41,390.81 0.00 0.19 100.00 Total Parks 60,722.00 47,418.96 47,418.96 0.00 13,303.04 78.09 212Page: 329 07/23/2020 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 213 1:30PM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020 Periods: 0 through 15 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Council Chambers Improvements8672 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8672-4200 Contract Services 196,361.00 45,350.43 45,350.43 23.108672-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 151,010.57 Total Council Chambers Improvements 196,361.00 45,350.43 45,350.43 0.00 151,010.57 23.10 Total Equipment Replacement Fund 3,540,657.00 1,749,405.43 1,749,405.43 506,958.64 1,284,292.93 63.73 Grand Total 70,600,065.00 50,037,941.56 50,037,941.56 74.62 2,645,554.08 17,916,569.36 213Page: 330 Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Project Title/Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Prct Used PCH- Aviation Mobility Project (12-143) 001-8143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 94,454.00 - - - 94,454.00 0.00% 115-8143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 34,581.00 - - - 34,581.00 0.00% 145-8143-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00% 146-8143-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00% 147-8143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 243,662.00 - - - 243,662.00 0.00% 301-8143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 263,437.00 - - - 263,437.00 0.00% 636,134.00 - - - 636,134.00 0.00% PCH Traffic Improvements (12-160) 147-8160-4201 Contract Serv/Private 399,922.00 - 336,596.87 78,901.13 (15,576.00) 103.89% 301-8160-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00% 399,922.00 - 336,596.87 78,901.13 (15,576.00) 103.89% 8th Street- Safe Route to School (14-173) 001-8173-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00% 115-8173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 325,744.00 53,489.60 323,730.85 47,124.00 (45,110.85) 113.85% 122-8173-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - 0.00% 150-8173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 354,535.00 38,329.29 351,088.39 49,980.00 (46,533.39) 113.13% 301-8173-4201 Contract Serv/Private 307,143.00 (91,818.89) 174,990.40 - 132,152.60 56.97% 987,422.00 - 849,809.64 97,104.00 40,508.36 95.90% Street Improvement - 21st between PCH/Ardmore (16-184) 150-8184-4201 Contract Serv/Private 71,000.00 (36,504.40) 60,206.09 26,519.50 (15,725.59) 122.15% 71,000.00 (36,504.40) 60,206.09 26,519.50 (15,725.59) 122.15% ADA Improvements - PCH between 2nd & 21st Street (16-185) 150-8185-4201 Contract Serv/Private 205,307.00 48,232.44 188,193.58 35,046.32 (17,932.90) 108.73% 205,307.00 48,232.44 188,193.58 35,046.32 (17,932.90) 108.73% Street Improvements - Various Locations (17-186) 001-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00% 115-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 262,164.00 - 7,217.50 16,900.00 238,046.50 9.20% 122-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00% 145-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00% 146-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00% 147-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 9,551.00 - 9,073.45 - 477.55 95.00% 148-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private 306,231.00 - 104,772.00 - 201,459.00 34.21% 301-8186-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - - - 0.00% 577,946.00 - 121,062.95 16,900.00 439,983.05 23.87% Strand Bikeway and Walkway Improv at 35th St (17-188) 147-8188-4201 Contract Serv/Private 102,956.00 - - - 102,956.00 0.00% 102,956.00 - - - 102,956.00 0.00% Sewer Improvements - Various Locations (17-416) 160-8416-4201 2,490,147.00 104,738.76 2,256,236.58 69,145.00 164,765.42 93.38% 2,490,147.00 104,738.76 2,256,236.58 69,145.00 164,765.42 93.38% Storm Drain Improv - Various Locations (17-417) 161-8417-4201 1,000,000.00 89.75 17,377.00 - 982,623.00 1.74% 301-8417-4201 80,000.00 1,375.45 36,410.30 43,589.70 - 100.00% 1,080,000.00 1,465.20 53,787.30 43,589.70 982,623.00 9.02% Citywide Parks Master Plan (13-538) 001-8538-4201 Contract Serv/Private 42,065.00 - - 1,654.00 40,411.00 3.93% 125-8538-4102 Regular Salaries 173,410.00 - - - 173,410.00 0.00% CIP Report by Project 6/30/2020 331 Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Project Title/Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Prct Used CIP Report by Project 6/30/2020 215,475.00 - - 1,654.00 213,821.00 0.77% Stormwater/Urban Runoff Diversion Project (16-542) 150-8542-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3,936,698.00 - - 495,758.45 3,440,939.55 12.59% 301-8542-4201 Contract Serv/Private 618,038.00 - - 1,370.20 616,667.80 0.22% 4,554,736.00 - - 497,128.65 4,057,607.35 10.91% Feasibility, Greenbelt Path (17-544) 301-8544-4201 Contract Serv/Private 10,000.00 - - - 10,000.00 0.00% 10,000.00 - - - 10,000.00 0.00% Clark Stadium Bleachers (17-545) 125-8545-4201 Contract Serv/Private 47,250.00 - - - 47,250.00 0.00% 47,250.00 - - - 47,250.00 0.00% Citywide Park Improvements (17-546) 125-8546-4201 Contract Serv/Private 32,000.00 7,940.00 30,422.97 1,080.00 497.03 98.45% 301-8546-4201 Contract Serv/Private 18,000.00 3,910.58 15,916.82 1,611.25 471.93 97.38% 50,000.00 11,850.58 46,339.79 2,691.25 968.96 98.06% Downtown Strategic Plan (12-609) 001-8609-4201 Contract Serv/Private 76,634.00 - (161.70) - 76,795.70 -0.21% 301-8609-4201 Contract Serv/Private 542,076.00 - 73,914.54 16,769.32 451,392.14 16.73% 618,710.00 - 73,752.84 16,769.32 528,187.84 14.63% Police Facility Improvements (14-614) 001-8614-4201 Contract Serv/Private 143.00 - 142.66 0.34 99.76% 301-8614-4201 Contract Serv/Private 53,546.00 - 6,965.21 2,247.48 44,333.31 17.21% 53,689.00 - 6,965.21 2,390.14 44,333.65 17.43% City Yard Renovation (15-615) 001-8615-4201 Contract Serv/Private 48,077.00 - 956.25 47,120.75 - 100.00% 301-8615-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,318,750.00 - 5,251.79 109,820.00 1,203,678.21 8.73% 1,366,827.00 - 6,208.04 156,940.75 1,203,678.21 11.94% Municipal Pier Structural Assessment & Repairs (16-629) 122-8629-4201 Contract Serv/Private 173,075.00 - - 6,570.00 166,505.00 3.80% 191-8629-4201 Contract Serv/Private 240,000.00 - - - 240,000.00 0.00% 413,075.00 - - 6,570.00 406,505.00 1.59% Community Center Gen Improvements (15-650) 001-8650-4201 Contract Serv/Private 104,626.00 - 4,650.00 - 99,976.00 4.44% 301-8650-4201 Contract Serv/Private 143,930.00 37,925.00 47,195.00 1,740.00 94,995.00 34.00% 248,556.00 37,925.00 51,845.00 1,740.00 194,971.00 21.56% Municipal Pier Structural Repairs Phase 3 (15-660) 122-8660-4201 Contract Serv/Private 275,473.00 - - - 275,473.00 0.00% 301-8660-4201 Contract Serv/Private 259,711.00 - 14,900.00 - 244,811.00 5.74% 535,184.00 - 14,900.00 - 520,284.00 2.78% Library Community Needs Assessment (15-668) 150-8668-4201 Contract Serv/Private 60,000.00 - - - 60,000.00 0.00% 60,000.00 - - - 60,000.00 0.00% City Park Restroom Renovations (15-669) 125-8669-4201 Contract Serv/Private 63,621.00 - - - 63,621.00 0.00% 301-8669-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,431,999.00 - - 17,520.00 1,414,479.00 1.22%332 Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Project Title/Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Prct Used CIP Report by Project 6/30/2020 1,495,620.00 - - 17,520.00 1,478,100.00 1.17% Tree Well Grates (15-670) 301-8670-4201 Contract Serv/Private 51,068.00 - - - 51,068.00 0.00% 51,068.00 - - - 51,068.00 0.00% Council Chambers Improvements (15-672) 001-8672-4201 Contract Serv/Private 106,209.00 - - - 106,209.00 0.00% 715-8672-4201 Contract Serv/Private 196,361.00 - 45,350.43 - 151,010.57 23.10% 302,570.00 - 45,350.43 - 257,219.57 14.99% Police Dept Substation Facility Improvement (16-674) 001-8674-4201 Contract Serv/Private 4,865.00 - 2,786.11 2,078.00 0.89 99.98% 4,865.00 - 2,786.11 2,078.00 0.89 99.98% Electrical Vehicle and Bicycle Transportation (16-682) 150-8682-4201 Contract Serv/Private 116,819.00 - - 15,300.22 101,518.78 13.10% 301-8682-4201 Contract Serv/Private 47,186.00 - - - 47,186.00 0.00% 164,005.00 - - 15,300.22 148,704.78 9.33% Bard Street Closure (17-683) 001-8683-4201 Contract Serv/Private 385.00 - - - 385.00 0.00% 301-8683-4201 Contract Serv/Private 44,086.00 - - - 44,086.00 0.00% 44,471.00 - - - 44,471.00 0.00% Emergency Operations Center Renovations (17-684) 301-8684-4201 Contract Serv/Private 192,880.00 - - - 192,880.00 0.00% 192,880.00 - - - 192,880.00 0.00% ADA Improvements - Various Locations (17-687) 140-8687-4201 Contract Serv/Private 78,344.00 3,645.00 77,943.73 400.27 99.49% 78,344.00 3,645.00 77,943.73 - 400.27 0.00% Clark Building Renovations (17-689) 301-8689-4201 Contract Serv/Private 420,072.00 - - - 420,072.00 0.00% 420,072.00 - - - 420,072.00 0.00% ADA Improvements - Various Locations (18-691) 140-8691-4201 Contract Serv/Private 78,771.00 - 72,929.22 5,841.78 92.58% 78,771.00 - 72,929.22 - 5,841.78 92.58% 14th Street Beach Restroom Rehab (18-692) 122-8692-4201 Contract Serv/Private 750,000.00 - - - 750,000.00 0.00% 125-8692-4201 Contract Serv/Private 50,000.00 - - - 50,000.00 0.00% 160-8692-4201 Contract Serv/Private 199,111.00 - - - 199,111.00 0.00% 999,111.00 - - - 999,111.00 0.00% Annual Streen Improvement 115-8190-4201 Contract Serv/Private 200,000.00 - - - 200,000.00 0.00% 200,000.00 - - - 200,000.00 0.00% Fort Lots-O-Fun Park improvements 125-8547-4201 Contract Serv/Private 50,000.00 - - - 50,000.00 0.00% 50,000.00 - - - 50,000.00 0.00% Proposition C Fund 146-8101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 40,000.00 - - - 40,000.00 0.00% 40,000.00 - - - 40,000.00 0.00%333 Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Project Title/Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Prct Used CIP Report by Project 6/30/2020 Proposition C Fund, Bus Stop Improvenebt 146-8102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 330,875.00 - - - 330,875.00 0.00% 330,875.00 - - - 330,875.00 0.00% Annual Sewer Improvements 160-8421-4201 Contract Serv/Private 250,000.00 27,421.25 96,369.58 106,355.42 47,275.00 81.09% 250,000.00 27,421.25 96,369.58 106,355.42 47,275.00 81.09% Storm Drains Fund 161-8164-4201 Contract Serv/Private 250,000.00 - - - 250,000.00 0.00% 250,000.00 - - - 250,000.00 0.00% Community Theater Needs Assessment 301-8693-4201 Contract Serv/Private 79,295.00 53,887.35 57,297.75 21,997.25 - 100.00% 79,295.00 53,887.35 57,297.75 21,997.25 - 100.00% Community Dev Block Grant 140-8698-4201 Contract Serv/Private 147,298.00 - - - 147,298.00 0.00% 147,298.00 - - - 147,298.00 0.00% Storms Drain Fund 161-8419-4201 Contract Serv/Private 120,000.00 2,675.25 2,675.25 - 117,324.75 2.23% 120,000.00 2,675.25 2,675.25 - 117,324.75 2.23% Storms Drain Fund 161-8422-4201 Contract Serv/Private 200,000.00 - - - 200,000.00 0.00% 200,000.00 - - - 200,000.00 0.00% Public Works Yard Relocation 301-8608-4201 Contract Serv/Private 60,000.00 - - - 60,000.00 0.00% 60,000.00 - - - 60,000.00 0.00% Community Theater Needs Assessment 301-8694-4201 Contract Serv/Private 40,000.00 - - - 40,000.00 0.00% 40,000.00 - - - 40,000.00 0.00% RTI Undersea Cable 190-8695-4201 Contract Serv/Private 482,260.00 - - - 482,260.00 0.00% 310-8695-4201 Contract Serv/Private 150,000.00 - - - 150,000.00 0.00% 632,260.00 - - - 632,260.00 0.00% Police Station Basement Restrooms Improvements 301-8696-4201 Contract Serv/Private 33,000.00 - - - 33,000.00 0.00% 33,000.00 - - - 33,000.00 0.00% Valley Park Restroom Renovations 301-8699-4201 Contract Serv/Private 65,000.00 173.34 50,863.66 1,474.00 12,662.34 80.52% 65,000.00 173.34 50,863.66 1,474.00 12,662.34 80.52% Grand Total 21,053,841.00 255,509.77 4,472,119.62 1,217,814.65 15,363,906.73 27.03% 334 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0467 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Recommended Action: The City Treasurer recommends that the City Council receive and file the June 2020 City Treasurer’s Report and Cash Balance Report. Summary: Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach’s adopted investment policy. Attached is a report of all inactive Public Deposits for the month of June 2020.This is the most current available investment information. Attachments: 1.June 2020 City Treasurer’s Report 2.June 2020 Cash Balance Report Respectfully Submitted by: Karen Nowicki, City Treasurer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Noted: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™335 INSTITUTIONS RATE YIELD DATE OF DATE OF ORIGINAL MARKET COST/MARKET FACE/PAR OF TO INVESTMENT TYPE/INSTITUTION CUSIP # BOOK VALUE INVESTMENT MATURITY COST VALUE DIFFERENCE VALUE INTEREST MATURITY POOLED INVESTMENTS LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund)10,254,789.98$ $10,254,789.98 1.217% LACPIF (Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Funds)16,781,002.61$ $16,781,002.61 0.980%Rate for May * Pooled Investments % of Total Investment 74.797% $27,035,792.59 NEGOTIABLE CDS Capital One Nat'l Assn 14042E5U08 $246,000.00 08/19/2015 08/19/2020 $246,000.00 $246,829.75 $829.75 $246,000.00 2.390% 2.390% Everbank Jacksonville 29976DA59 $245,000.00 08/28/2015 08/28/2020 $245,000.00 $245,765.33 $765.33 $245,000.00 2.040% 2.040% American Express Centurion 02587DF86 $247,000.00 11/04/2015 11/04/2020 $247,000.00 $248,735.81 $1,735.81 $247,000.00 2.230% 2.230% Synchrony Bank 87164YKW3 $247,000.00 11/20/2015 11/20/2020 $247,000.00 $248,895.57 $1,895.57 $247,000.00 2.180% 2.180% Comenity Capital Bank 20033ANX0 $249,000.00 01/19/2016 01/19/2021 $249,000.00 $251,169.57 $2,169.57 $249,000.00 1.880% 1.880% EnerBank USA 29266NX51 $247,000.00 01/28/2016 01/28/2021 $247,000.00 $249,172.44 $2,172.44 $247,000.00 1.880% 1.880% World Foremost Bank Sydney 981571CQ3 $200,000.00 06/09/2016 06/09/2021 $200,000.00 $202,254.37 $2,254.37 $200,000.00 1.680% 1.680% Wells Fargo Bank NA Siouxfall 9497485W3 $249,000.00 06/17/2016 06/17/2021 $249,000.00 $251,993.98 $2,993.98 $249,000.00 1.730% 1.730% First Bank of Puerto Rico 33767AZY09 $248,000.00 08/26/2016 08/26/2021 $248,000.00 $250,812.17 $2,812.17 $248,000.00 1.430% 1.430% Beneficial Mutual Savings 08173QBR6 $248,000.00 09/12/2016 09/12/2021 $248,000.00 $250,999.08 $2,999.08 $248,000.00 1.480% 1.480% Countryside Federal Credit Union 22239MAL2 $249,000.00 10/18/2016 10/18/2021 $249,000.00 $253,094.69 $4,094.69 $249,000.00 1.620% 1.620% Venture Bank 92326XDE8 $249,000.00 12/02/2016 09/02/2021 $249,000.00 $251,940.97 $2,940.97 $249,000.00 1.480% 1.480% Stearns Bank NA 857894SK6 $242,000.00 01/13/2017 01/13/2022 $242,000.00 $248,225.77 $6,225.77 $242,000.00 2.000% 2.000% East Boston Savings Bank 27113PBM2 $248,000.00 01/20/2017 01/20/2022 $248,000.00 $254,255.83 $6,255.83 $248,000.00 1.950% 1.950% Goldman Sachs Bank 38148PKT3 $246,000.00 06/14/2017 06/14/2022 $246,000.00 $256,139.59 $10,139.59 $246,000.00 2.260% 2.260% Barclays Bank 06740KKD8 $246,788.52 07/22/2017 07/12/2022 $247,000.00 $256,951.42 $9,951.42 $247,000.00 2.110% 2.230% Marlin Business Bank 57116APQ5 $249,000.00 08/22/2017 08/23/2022 $249,000.00 $258,778.49 $9,778.49 $249,000.00 1.970% 1.970% Merrick Bank South Jordan 59013JC49 $249,000.00 10/19/2017 10/20/2022 $249,000.00 $259,781.22 $10,781.22 $249,000.00 2.010% 2.010% Northfield Bank 66612ABX5 $247,000.00 10/24/2017 10/25/2022 $247,000.00 $258,036.63 $11,036.63 $247,000.00 2.060% 2.060% Morgan Stanley Bank 61747MH95 $249,000.00 02/01/2018 02/01/2023 $249,000.00 $261,487.79 $12,487.79 $249,000.00 2.490% 2.490% Allegiance Bank 01748DBA3 $246,000.00 02/07/2018 02/07/2023 $246,000.00 $264,454.35 $18,454.35 $246,000.00 2.450% 2.450% CitiBank NA 17312QN39 $245,000.00 06/15/2018 06/15/2023 $245,000.00 $266,985.13 $21,985.13 $245,000.00 2.980% 2.980% BMW Bank North America 05580AMX9 $245,000.00 06/15/2018 06/15/2023 $245,000.00 $266,985.13 $21,985.13 $245,000.00 2.980% 2.980% Industrial & Commercial Bank of China 45581EAX9 $249,000.00 08/17/2018 06/30/2023 $249,000.00 $272,011.35 $23,011.35 $249,000.00 3.020% 3.020% Bank Midwest Spirit Lake 063615BM9 $244,604.76 09/17/2018 09/15/2023 $245,000.00 $267,586.43 $22,586.43 $245,000.00 2.840% 3.030% UBS Bank 90348JEJ5 $249,000.00 10/17/2018 10/17/2023 $249,000.00 $274,636.38 $25,636.38 $249,000.00 3.040% 3.040% Spring Bank 849430AY9 $249,000.00 10/24/2018 10/24/2023 $249,000.00 $273,947.00 $24,947.00 $249,000.00 2.950% 2.950% Morgan Stanley Private Bank 61760AUJ6 $246,000.00 01/17/2019 01/17/2024 $246,000.00 $271,377.23 $25,377.23 $246,000.00 2.860% 2.860% Country Bank New York 22230PBY5 $249,000.00 01/25/2019 01/25/2024 $249,000.00 $273,470.44 $24,470.44 $249,000.00 2.730% 2.730% Eaglebank Bethesda 27002YEQ5 $249,000.00 06/20/2019 06/20/2024 $249,000.00 $269,058.79 $20,058.79 $249,000.00 2.130% 2.130% Revere Bank 761402BY1 $248,000.00 06/28/2019 06/28/2024 $248,000.00 $267,991.05 $19,991.05 $248,000.00 2.130% 2.130% Firstier Bank 33766LAJ7 $249,000.00 08/23/2019 08/23/2024 $249,000.00 $266,192.16 $17,192.16 $249,000.00 1.820% 1.820% Washington Federal 938828BN9 $249,000.00 08/28/2019 08/28/2024 $249,000.00 $266,129.02 $17,129.02 $249,000.00 1.820% 1.820% Sallie Mae Bank 7954504W2 $247,000.00 10/17/2019 10/23/2024 $247,000.00 $264,060.74 $17,060.74 $247,000.00 1.780% 1.780% Raymond James Bank 75472RAK7 $246,407.20 11/08/2019 11/08/2024 $247,000.00 $263,088.69 $16,088.69 $263,088.69 1.690% 1.690% Live Oak Banking 538036HP2 $249,000.00 01/24/2020 01/20/2025 $249,000.00 $266,421.14 $17,421.14 $249,000.00 1.730% 1.730% Horizon Bank 44042TCD4 $249,000.00 04/15/2020 04/15/2025 $249,000.00 $260,481.57 $11,481.57 $249,000.00 1.240% 1.240% Negotiable CD % of Total Investment 25.203% $9,109,800.48 TOTAL ALL INVESTMENTS 36,145,593.07$ $9,111,000.00 $9,560,197.07 $449,197.07 $36,162,881.28 Average Rate of Interest 2.084% Average Yield to Maturity 2.145% In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, the Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby certifies that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months. *June rate publishes the first week of August. APPROVED: KAREN NOWICKI, CITY TREASURER TREASURER'S REPORT JUNE 2020 336 GENERAL ACCOUNT FUND 5/31/2020 6/30/2020 NUMBER FUND NAME BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENTS CHECKS ADJUSTMENTS BALANCE 001 GENERAL $11,280,768.38 $2,185,107.91 ($1,523,981.59) ($1,393,439.17) ($193,560.02) $10,354,895.51 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING $78,548.75 $10,470.58 ($1,383.96) ($35,763.01) (287.45) $51,584.91 115 STATE GAS TAX $478,699.53 $71,776.37 ($126,327.02) $424,148.88 117 AB939 $127,812.12 $3,372.13 ($4,710.23) $126,474.02 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE $0.00 $0.00 122 TYCO $1,272,710.44 $42,241.50 $3,341.82 $1,318,293.76 125 PARK REC FAC TAX $337,282.30 $12,403.00 $888.70 $350,574.00 135 BAYVIEW DRIVE DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $4,392.79 ($184.33) $4,208.46 138 LOMA DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $11.03 ($531.00) ($519.97) 139 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $3,694.16 ($144.00) $3,550.16 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ($172,169.03) ($172,169.03) 145 PROPOSITION A $434,445.36 $27,262.47 $1,169.91 ($1,264.25) $461,613.49 146 PROPOSITION C $1,034,917.41 $22,538.85 $2,687.42 $1,060,143.68 147 MEASURE R $266,349.02 $16,804.27 $719.61 $283,872.90 148 MEASURE M $170,671.13 $19,060.81 $482.19 $190,214.13 150 GRANTS $482,991.34 $37,262.21 ($45,430.85) ($17,956.39) $456,866.31 152 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT $63,438.38 $46.18 (5.96) $63,478.60 153 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES $349,428.82 $809.25 ($31,002.73) $319,235.34 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE $5,346,458.04 $31,417.77 $260.20 ($140,476.01) (1,083.33) $5,236,576.67 161 STORM DRAIN FUND $1,713,656.48 $52,569.53 ($17,577.00) (790.96) $1,747,858.05 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE $626,406.91 $2,091.47 ($689.91) $627,808.47 180 FIRE PROTECTION $26,033.71 $1,849.17 $61.75 ($3,589.00) $24,355.63 190 RTI UNDERSEA CABLE $460,905.61 $1,171.35 $462,076.96 191 RTI UNDERSEA CABLE TIDELANDS $251,585.67 $639.33 $252,225.00 201 2015 LEASE REVENUE BONDS $0.00 $0.00 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $9,995,393.78 $166,647.06 ($96,941.63) $10,065,099.21 609 BAYVIEW DRIVE REDEMPTION $123,002.71 $1,090.29 $315.29 $124,408.29 610 LOWER PIER DISTRICT REDEMPTION $3,097.92 $7.87 $3,105.79 611 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT REDEMPTION $59,808.54 $151.96 $59,960.50 612 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESERVE $4,550.33 $11.56 $4,561.89 619 BAYVIEW DRIVE DISTRICT RESERVE $14,940.97 $37.96 $14,978.93 705 INSURANCE $9,784,473.59 $3,000.00 $205,602.80 (135,330.80) (1,065.16) $9,856,680.43 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $5,345,141.47 $8,289.43 $78,080.10 ($53,080.65) ($2,109.27) $5,376,321.08 TOTAL GENERAL ACCOUNT $49,969,447.66 $2,493,946.76 ($1,184,899.67) ($1,927,110.55) ($198,902.15) $49,152,482.05 BALANCE BALANCE ACCOUNTS 5/31/2020 DEPOSITS CHARGES 6/30/2020 PAYROLL $68,040.72 $1,206,586.73 ($1,218,498.97) $56,128.48 CABLE TV DEPOSIT $16,747.11 $8.31 $16,755.42 $84,787.83 $1,206,595.04 ($1,218,498.97) $72,883.90 TOTAL ALL ACCOUNTS $49,225,365.95 BANK BALANCES INVESTMENTS GENERAL $14,532,523.74 $36,145,593.07 TRUST ACCOUNTS $127,012.38 $14,659,536.12 OUTSTANDING CHECKS ($1,579,763.24) INTEREST COLLECTED $13,079,772.88 TO DATE FOR FY 19/20 INVESTMENTS $36,145,593.07 $765,429.04 BALANCE $49,225,365.95 APPROVED : KAREN NOWICKI, CITY TREASURER CASH BALANCE REPORT JUNE 2020 337 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0479 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of June 28, 2020 CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS (City Treasurer Karen Nowicki) Recommended Action: The City Treasurer recommends that the City Council approve cancellation of certain checks. Summary: Please ratify the following request for cancellation of the check(s) listed below: Check #:92850 Date Issued:9/12/2019 Amount:$100.00 Payee:Mick Gaglia Class cancelled. Check #:93861 Date Issued:1/23/2020 Amount:$441.00 Payee:Automotive Service Excellence Duplicate Payment. Check #:94722 Date Issued:5/27/2020 Amount:$50.00 Payee:Celeste Coar Vendor did not receive check. Check #:94786 Date Issued:6/4/2020 Amount:$650.00 Payee:CA Peace Officers Association Vendor did not receive check. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™338 Staff Report REPORT 20-0479 Respectfully Submitted by: Karen Nowicki, City Treasurer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Noted: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™339 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0471 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 20, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of May 20, 2020. Attachments: Minutes of May 20, 2020 Approved: Marnell Gibson, Public Works Director Noted: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™340 ACTION MINUTES PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, MAY 20 , 2020 CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1315 VALLEY DRIVE 7:00 P.M. COMMISSIONERS Kathy Dunbabin Janice Brittain Kent F. Brown David Grethen Andrea N. Giancoli ********************************************************************************************* ****************** THIS MEETING IS HELD PURSUANT TO EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 ISSUED BY GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM ON MARCH 17, 2020. ANY OR ALL COMMISSION MEMBERS MAY ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE BY TELECONFERENCE/VIRTUAL MEETING. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE BY TELECONFERENCE. ********************************************************************************************* ****************** Public Participation City Hall will be closed to the public until further notice. Members of the public may email comments to anguyen@hermosabeach.gov until 5:00 p.m. on the meeting date. Members of the public may also participate by phone. TO PARTICIPATE BY PHONE: 1. Email anguyen@hermosabeach.gov to be added to the speaker list. Please indicate which item you would like to speak on. 2. Dial-in 10 minutes prior to the start of the meeting: • Toll-Free Dial-in: 1-877-568- 4106 • Participant passcode: 244-571-045 3. PLEASE MUTE YOUR PHONE UNTIL YOU ARE CALLED TO SPEAK. Comments from the public are limited to 3 minutes per speaker. Public Works Commission agendas and staff reports are available for your review on the City’s web site located at www.hermosabeach.gov. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Introduction of New Police Chief Paul LeBaron Police Chief Paul LeBaron introduced himself to Commissioners as the new Police Chief for the City of Hermosa Beach. Chief LeBaron shared a bit about his career history in the field of criminal justice, which includes 4 to 7 years of experience working in the Long Beach and South Bay areas. Chief LeBaron also shared he teaches Criminal Justice courses at California State University Long 341 2 Beach. He expressed his eagerness to work with the community and other departments to maintain the City safe. Commissioner Grethen asked Chief LeBaron to share any opportunities he foresaw to collaborate with Public Works in creating a safe environment. Chief LeBaron explained opportunities to collaborate exist in ensuring that both the Police Department and Public Works work toward maintaining a clean and safe environment, which range from removing graffiti immediately to replacing broken signs, to repairing roads in a timely fashion, as he believes this is just one of many ways to fend off crime. Chief LeBaron shared from the moment he joined the Hermosa Beach team, he and his team have worked on resolving different issues, as well as collaborating with Public Works Director Marnell Gibson to address needs pertaining to COVID-19. Commissioners welcomed Chief LeBaron and offered their services to him. 5. Approval of Action Minutes a. January 15, 2020 ACTION: Commissioner Grethen motioned to approve the action minutes from May 20, 2020. Seconded by Commissioner Brittain, approved and accepted. The motion passed. AYES: Brown, Brittain AYES: Brown, Brittain, Grethen, Giancoli NOES: None ABSTAIN: Dunbabin ABSENT: None 6. Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items: None. 7. Correspondence: Resident Rosalva Vieyra submitted an email to share her concerns regarding the opening of the beach and the spread of COVID-19. Ms. Vieyra observed people at the beach not practicing safe measures, such as avoiding gatherings and wearing masks to slow the spread. Based on her concerns that such behavior can contribute to the spread of COVID-19, she recommended improvements be made in enforcement of safety measures, limiting the entry points, and increasing visibility of the signage posted at the beach. ACTION: Commissioner Brittain motioned to acknowledge receipt of Ms. Vieyra’s email. Seconded by Chairperson Brown. The motion passed. AYES: Brown, Dunbabin, Brittain, Grethen, Giancoli NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None 8. Presentations A. FY 2020-21 CIP Study Session Public Works Director Marnell Gibson provided a summary of the FY 2020-21 CIP Study Session that was presented to City Council on April 22, 2020 for consideration in the FY 2020-21 City Budget. The summary included a description of CIP Programs and the goals to improve the processes in adopting and prioritizing CIP projects, considering funding, capacity, urgency, and ability to deliver. Director Gibson shared three main projects are part of the City’s Master Plan and include storm drain and sewer improvements. Public Works also plans to improve community outreach efforts in carrying out internal projects, as well as those involving external agencies. Some of the major developments in FY 2020-2021 will involve improving the CIP Webpage for information to become more readily available to the public, ADA improvements, PCH mobility improvements, striping improvements, and more. In total, the City has 37 projects to work on in FY 2020-21 with the budget being distributed as 4% toward studies and 342 3 assessments, 22% toward street and highway improvements, 30% toward sewer and storm and drain, and 44% toward public buildings and ground improvements. Public Works plans to work on all CIP Projects while also navigating changes that are brought forth by the COVID-19 pandemic. 9. Items for Consideration A. Greg Jarvis Memorial Replacement Bench Recommendation: It is recommended that the Public Works Commission consider: 1. Selecting a replacement bench for the Greg Jarvis Memorial on The Strand. Commissioners were provided with the different options for replacing the original bench for the Greg Jarvis Memorial on The Strand. Various factors were considered including durability, ability to repair, and consistency with the Greg Jarvis Memorial Subcommittee’s careful selection of the original memorial bench in 1987. Following their careful consideration Commissioner Giancoli motioned to adopt option B, which closely resembled the original bench, and Commissioner Grethen made a substitute motion to adapt option B in the color gray. Chairperson Brown seconded the motion. The motion passed. AYES: Brown, Dunbabin, Brittain, Grethen NOES: Giancoli ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None B. Memorial Donation Benches Update Recommendation: It is recommended that the Public Works Commission consider: 1. Selecting a menu of bench models to be used for future memorial installations in designated areas. Deputy City Engineer Lucho Rodriguez provided a brief summary of how the current Memorial Bench Program is run and shared details of the conditions of the current memorial benches. Deputy City Engineer Rodriguez expressed Public Works’ interest in improving the current program by determining the availability of places to locate memorial benches to ensure applications that are received are properly approved. In addition, limiting the number of bench styles to two or three would ensure uniformity of benches in designated areas. With these new changes, the style options would be limited, but these would vary by location; thus, this would provide donors the opportunity to select a location for their bench. Deputy City Engineer Rodriguez provided six different options to Commissioners for selection of which two were selected. Consideration of the benches relied on weight, durability, and maintenance. Commissioner Giancoli expressed an interest in selecting recycled plastic benches given the City’s vision to become more environmentally friendly. Commissioner Grethen requested Public Works’ opinion regarding the durability and maintenance of the benches based on specific material. Deputy City Engineer Rodriguez commented that plastic benches would be easier to 343 4 maintain and repair if damage occurred stating parts could easily be replaced. Other concerns included the cost of each bench and how to best protect it from damage depending on their locations. Commissioner Giancoli motioned to adapt option one and option three to which Commissioner Grethen motioned an amendment to have Public Works determine if benches in a particular area necessitate a central bench bar. Commissioner Dunbabin seconded the motion. The motion passed. AYES: Brown, Dunbabin, Brittain, Grethen, Giancoli NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None 10. Commissioners’ Reports - None 11. Monthly Reports A. Monthly Activity Reports – November 2019, December 2019, January 2020, February 2020 Accepted and approved. B. CIP Status with Verbal Updates Deputy City Engineer Rodriguez addressed Commissioner Grethen’s earlier inquiry about the impact COVID-19 has had on CIP Projects. Electric Pier Design The first project to be impacted concerned the Electric Pier Design, which was stalled when the company working on the project closed. This halted the project as it was difficult to contact company staff to move the project forward. Park Restrooms The second project to be affected was the Park Restrooms. Given that the consultant responsible for the design could not complete the task fast enough. CIP 160 – Traffic Improvements This project is in the last phase and is pending Caltrans’ approval to turn on the systems. Caltrans is currently reviewing the installation of a light at the corner of Pier Avenue and PCH that had not been previously approved. However, this project is nearing completion. Restroom Construction Plans to construct restrooms at Fort Lots of Fun are still in place. However, there are delays regarding the designs. Given Fort Lots of Fun is to be renovated soon, Public Works is considering holding the restroom construction for the time being as relocating the planned restroom might be a feasible option. The formation of a joint commission for the Fort Lots of Fun renovation project is under consideration. Clark Building Renovation The renovations are still on hold. Council Chamber Audio Improvements A preconstruction meeting was held in May to discuss the project and award the contract. Following this meeting, Public Works is set host its reconstruction meeting. This project 344 5 consists of redoing the audiovisual equipment to improve video and sound quality. These improvements would improve the television transmission. CIP 188 – Bikeway and Walkway Improvements Commissioner Giancoli inquired about the timing and clarification regarding the description of the project given it was omitting the walkway. Deputy City Engineer Rodriguez explained the timing or delayed progress results from the project not being a top priority project. In addition, he clarified the project did involve the connection the bikeway and walkway from The Strand to Manhattan Beach. Street Improvements Commissioner Grethen inquired about the status of the Street Improvements Project. Public Works has opted to complete the project internally as time to work on the project is available. The consultants were not very responsive, which led to undesired delays. While Public Works plans to complete this project internally, the end date is questionable given COVID- 19. City Yard Commissioner Grethen requested a status update and inquired about the County’s comments on the project. Deputy City Engineer explained there are delays in completing the project given the County provided a second round of comments for Public Works to consider. CIP 693 Commissioner Grethen inquired if the Community Theater Needs Assessment has been completed. Deputy City Engineer shared there has been a delay in community outreach and other aspects of the project due to COVID-19. Above items are presented for information purposes only 12. Director’s Verbal Updates Director Gibson shared the new date for the Budget Study Session on June 3, 2020 and mentioned the next Public Works Commission meeting would be hosted via Zoom. 13. Commissioner Items (Other Matters) Commissioner Grethen acknowledged the Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan is “slipping out” and the importance of it being an item for Commissioners to hear. 14. Commissioner’s Announcements – None. 15. Adjournment – Next meeting scheduled for July 15, 2020. 345 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0475 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF JULY 21, 2020 (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of July 21, 2020. Number of Projects/Studies by Phase # of Projects/Studies Study/Conceptual Planning 6 Preliminary Design 17 Final Engineering Design 12 Project Approvals/ Bidding 2 Construction 1 Closeout 0 Total Projects 31 Total Studies 7 Number of Projects/Studies by Completion Timeline # of Projects/Studies 1 - Complete by end of FY 20-21 12 2 - Complete in FY 21-22 4 3 - 3 years to completion 0 4 - 5 years to completion 0 5 - TBD 22 Projects/Studies Complete 0 Total Projects 31 Total Studies 7 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™346 Staff Report REPORT 20-0475 Number of Projects/Studies by Category # of Projects/Studies Street & Highway Improvements 10 Sewer & Storm Drain Improvements 6 Park Improvements 2 Public Building & Ground Improvements 20 Total Projects 31 Total Studies 7 # of Projects/Studies Number of Projects/Studies by Manager Lead Support Total Lucho Rodriguez 6 0 9 Reed Salan 0 0 0 Romany Basilyous 6 0 6 Andrew Nguyen 6 2 8 Doug Krauss 2 1 3 Leeanne Singleton 1 0 1 Kelly Orta 2 0 2 TBD 16 0 13 Total Projects/Studies 38 Attachments: Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of July 21, 2020. Respectfully Submitted by: Marnell Gibson, Public Works Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™347 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 7.21.20 FY 2020-21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Grey indicates projects on hold. Project CategoryCIP No.Project Name Project Budget Project Manager Study/Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutTentative Date to Next Milestone/ Update Estimated Project Completion Date Current Project Status Project Description SH 102 Bus Stops Improvements 900,000$ TBD X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability.This project will improve bus stops throughout the City. These improvements will include Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible curb ramps, concrete bus pads, crosswalk, striping improvements, furnishing, and other general improvements within direct vicinity of the bus stops. SH 143 PCH Mobility Improvement Project 541,680$ Lucho Rodriguez X TBD TBD On Hold. Study/Conceptual Planning. Staff in conversation with Cal Trans, Metro and Council of Governments for funding possibilities. This project would retain the existing number of lanes including north and south bound flex lanes and maintain lane widths of ten (10) feet, and flex lanes of twelve (12) feet with zero (0) feet shoulders. Collectively, the improvements will address existing, near-term, and long- range future traffic conditions along this corridor by improving intersection operations, reducing instances of unsafe turning movements, create a safe and more comfortable environment for pedestrians and transit riders, and improving the efficient movement of vehicles along the corridor. SH 164 Hermosa Avenue Green Street 140,000$ Doug Krauss Lucho Rodriguez X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Secure design services as part of Study 103 Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment Grant along with City of Torrance securing grant and design services to prepare plans and specifications. The project will design and implement Low Impact Development (LID) and green infrastructure on Hermosa Ave from 4th Street to Herondo Avenue, which will include a variety of green street design elements. This project is part of Study 103 Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment Grant recipient for preliminary design. This project is also part of a multicity green street project lead by City of Torrance. SH 186 Street Improvements - Various Locations 1,609,000$ Romany Basilyous X Complete Final Engineering Design - 9/20 06/21 Final Engineering Design. Project to be designed in-house.This project provides for pavement rehabilitation of streets at various locations. The project will also repair/replace deteriorated portions of sidewalk, curb and gutter, and curb ramps. This project also includes the resurfacing of 24th Street between Valley Drive and Park Avenue. The scope of work includes the construction of curb and gutter as needed to correct street drainage deficiencies as well as lowering of public utilities (by utility companies) to standard depth to permit the proper street construction. This work will be performed following the sewer and storm drain repairs identified in the Sewer and Drainage Master Plans. Project will be bided out together with Project 190. SH 188 Strand Bikeway and Walkway Improvements at 35th Street 10,000$ TBD X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Secure design services as part of Study 103 Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment Grant. This project would provide improved accessibility and connectivity for bicyclists travelling between the Cities of Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach via The Strand at 35th Street. The project will also consider the addition of a dedicated ADA path to provide greater ADA accessibility to The Strand. This project is part of Study 103 Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment Grant recipient for preliminary design. SH 190 Annual Street Improvements 200,000$ Romany Basilyous X Complete Final Engineering Design - 9/20 06/21 Final Engineering Design. Project to be designed in-house.This project provides for pavement rehabilitation of streets at various locations. The project will also repair/replace deteriorated portions of sidewalk, curb and gutter, and curb ramps. This work will be performed following the sewer and storm drain repairs identified in the Sewer and Drainage Master Plans. Project will be combined with Project 186. SH 191 Annual Street Improvements 50,000$ TBD X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability.This project provides for pavement rehabilitation of streets at various locations. The project will also repair/replace deteriorated portions of sidewalk, curb and gutter, and curb ramps. This work will be performed following the sewer and storm drain repairs identified in the Sewer and Drainage Master Plans. SH 192 Annual Striping Improvements (NEW)100,000$ TBD X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability.This project provides traffic striping, markings, and signage improvements and modifications throughout the City at various locations to improve safety and visibility. This project will help address needed thermoplastic striping which the City is not capable of installing directly. SH 193 Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements (NEW)450,000$ TBD X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability.This project will implement rectangular rapid flashing beacons and other measures at several uncontrolled pedestrian crossings on Hermosa Avenue at 4th, 6th, 19th, 24th, 25th Streets, and at Herondo Street and Monterey Blvd. and the crossing in front of Clark Building on Valley Drive. Categories: SH = Street/Highway SSD = Sewer/Storm Drain PI = Parks PBG = Public Building and Ground 1 of 4 348 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 7.21.20 FY 2020-21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Grey indicates projects on hold. Project CategoryCIP No.Project Name Project Budget Project Manager Study/Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutTentative Date to Next Milestone/ Update Estimated Project Completion Date Current Project Status Project Description SSD 417 Annual Storm Drain Improvements - Various Locations 2,044,966$ Romany Basilyous X Complete Final Engineering Design - 9/20 06/21 Final Engineering Design. On-call design firm preparing plans and specifications.Storm drain improvements throughout the City. Locations will be as identified and prioritized per the Storm Drain Master Plan. Projects will address deficiencies, ponding, and repairs as well as where new storm drains are needed citywide. This project will also address operational deficiencies at the outfall structures at 18th Street and 19th Street. Improvements include for design and construction activities on an annual basis. Project to be bided out together with Project 422. SSD 419 Storm Drain Pipe Screens 120,000$ Romany Basilyous X Complete Construction - 12/20 12/20 Project Approvals/Bidding. Council approval of construction contract in July.The City has revised its strategy for addressing the Santa Monica Bay Debris Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) using State Board-approved full capture devices or systems to achieve 100% reduction of trash from the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). The City will install approximately 160 screen assemblies inside various storm drain catch basins throughout the City, in front of the outlet pipe, preventing debris from entering the storm drain system. They City has installed approximately 120 screens previously. SSD 421 Annual Sewer Improvements 2,210,783$ Andrew Nguyen X Complete Final Engineering Design - 10/20 12/20 Final Engineering Design. On-call design firm preparing plans and specifications.This project includes design and construction of sewer improvements and repairs based on the Sewer Master Plan. SSD 422 Annual Storm Drain Improvements 500,000$ Romany Basilyous X Complete Final Engineering Design - 9/20 06/21 Final Engineering Design. On-call design firm preparing plans and specifications.Storm drain improvements throughout the City. Locations will be as identified and prioritized per the Storm Drain Master Plan. Projects will address deficiencies, ponding, and repairs as well as where new storm drains are needed citywide. This project will also address operational deficiencies at the outfall structures at 18th Street and 19th Street. Improvements include for design and construction activities on an annual basis. Project will be bid out together with Project 417. SSD 423 Annual Sewer Improvements 250,000$ Andrew Nguyen X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability.This project includes design and construction of sewer improvements and repairs based on the Sewer Master Plan. SSD 424 Annual Storm Drain Improvements 250,000$ TBD X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability.Storm drain improvements throughout the City. Locations will be as identified and prioritized per the Storm Drain Master Plan. Projects will address deficiencies, ponding, and repairs as well as where new storm drains are needed citywide. This project will also address operational deficiencies at the outfall structures at various locations. Improvements include for design and construction activities on an annual basis. PBG 601 Prospect Avenue Curb Ramps 63,710$ Andrew Nguyen X Complete Final Engineering Design - 10/20 06/21 Final Engineering Design. Finalizing plans and specifications. This project provides improvements and relocation of sidewalks, curb ramps and obstructions along Prospect Avenue in order to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meet the latest Federal Standards. Project to be bided out together with Project 698. PBG 602 City Wide ADA Improvements (NEW)50,000$ TBD X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability.This project provides improvements city wide in order to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meet the latest Federal Standards along with the City’s Transition Plan being developed. PBG 608 Downtown Lighting Improvements 60,000$ TBD X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability.This project will improve safety, security and ambiance in the downtown area through lighting improvements as determined by the Downtown Security Assessment Report. PBG 609 Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation 468,161$ Andrew Nguyen X Complete Final Engineering Design - 10/20 12/20 Final Engineering Design. Preparing plans and specs for Plaza catenary lights and light dimming units. The purpose of this project is to mitigate safety concerns with lighting improvements for the City’s downtown area. This project will install catenary lights and dimming units on Pier Plaza. PBG 615 New Corporate Yard Facilities 1,313,498$ Doug Krauss Lucho Rodriguez X Complete Preliminary Design - 12/20 12/21 Preliminary Design. Environmental consultant preparing studies to respond to County's comments. This project is for the design and construction of a new city yard. Construction will be done in two phases. Phase 1 to include one metal prefabricated building to house a new mechanic, paint/sign shop and contracted services. New wash down station area. Phase 2 to include demolition of existing buildings. Construction of new administration building. General yard improvements (fencing, landscaping, drainage). PBG 629 Municipal Pier Structural Assessment and Repairs 413,075$ Lucho Rodriguez X Complete Final Engineering Design - 10/20 12/21 Final Engineering Design. Submitting plans for Coastal commission approval. Repairs of the municipal pier structural elements including the piles, pile caps, deck and the lifeguard storage room. PBG 660 Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs 535,184$ TBD X Complete Final Engineering Design - TBD TBD Final Engineering Design. Design Company closed offices permanently. Need to find solution to complete plans. The pier electrical repairs will involve the replacement of existing conduit, junction boxes, connections and wiring so that the lights can be functional. The project will also eliminate the service box towards the end of the pier and create a new service connection point for the foghorn at the end of the pier. This project will also include the replacement of the bollard lighting at the pier with new LED lighting fixtures. PBG 669 City Park Restrooms and Renovation 1,545,620$ Lucho Rodriguez X Complete Project Approvals/Bidding - 8/20 06/21 Project Approvals/Bidding. Plans received from designer . Advertising for construction bids in July-August. This project consists of construction of ADA compliant restroom at Forts Lot-Of-Fun, Seaview Parkette, South Park, and Clark Field. Categories: SH = Street/Highway SSD = Sewer/Storm Drain PI = Parks PBG = Public Building and Ground 2 of 4 349 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 7.21.20 FY 2020-21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Grey indicates projects on hold. Project CategoryCIP No.Project Name Project Budget Project Manager Study/Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutTentative Date to Next Milestone/ Update Estimated Project Completion Date Current Project Status Project Description PBG 672 Council Chamber Audiovisual Improvements 310,638$ Romany Basilyous X Complete Construction - 8/20 10/20 Project Approvals/Bidding. Bid opening May 2020. Construction contract to be awarded May 2020. Construction scheduled to begin in July and completed in August. Project will replace audio visual equipment in the Council Chambers including additional enhancements such as Video Wall Solution (110” seamless sidewall display) and 55” lobby overflow display. PBG 682 Parking Lot D Improvements 663,655$ Doug Krauss X Complete Final Engineering Design - 10/20 03/22 Final Engineering Design. Construction pending California Coastal Conservancy Board approval of grant in October 2020. The project will install a rapid electric vehicle charging station, expand bicycle parking and capture and treat storm water run-off from road and parking surfaces. PBG 684 Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Renovations 192,880$ TBD X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability.This project will add restrooms to the EOC and renovate the adjacent room for future EOC uses. The EOC is located within a building designated as a historical building, which will require a Certificate of Appropriateness to complete the repairs. This project will be completed in two phases. Phase 1 includes restroom construction including flooring, lighting, wall and ceiling repairs, painting, new plumbing, and installing fixtures. Phase 2 includes complete room renovation including new flooring, ceiling, lighting, furnishings, and relocation of Emergency System IT equipment, including a new switch, 2 UPC batteries, and firewall to support the EOC. Security Improvements to include new key fob locking systems. PBG 689 Clark Building Renovations 420,072$ Lucho Rodriguez X Complete Preliminary Design - 12/20 12/21 Preliminary Design. The project proposes: 1. Design, Operational Review 2. Kitchen Remodel - including new commercial appliances, sinks, countertops, lighting, tile, flooring, doors and ADA upgrades. 3. Restrooms Remodel - including new flooring, fixtures, stalls, sinks, toilets, lighting, and ADA upgrades. Electrical, plumbing, sewer line upgrades. 4. Install new Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning. 5. Acoustic panels and new lighting throughout ballroom area. 6. ADA upgrades to entrance building entrance points. PBG 692 14th Street Beach Restroom Rehabilitation 1,000,000$ TBD X TBD TBD Study/Conceptual Planning.This project proposes to construct a new restroom facility which includes replacement of the entire building; restrooms; appurtenant plumbing; ADA improvements for compliance. This project will also include the replacement of the existing sewer lift station components which includes 2 submersible pumps; motor control panel; associated plumbing; addition of telemetry for condition/outage notifications. PBG 695 Parking Lot A Improvements 632,260$ TBD X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Secure design services to prepare plans and specifications. This project will consist of upgrading Parking Lot A to meet ADA standards, with improvements including: • New layout to maximize parking capacity and improve circulation. • Consideration of the layout of parking spaces on 11th Street and explore incorporating 11th Street parking spaces into the Lot A pay station system. • New surfacing and lighting. • New trash enclosures adjacent to commercial buildings and removal of the trash enclosure and joint compactor. • Low impact development elements including permeable pavers and landscaping. Coastal Commission permits will be required. PBG 696 Police Station Improvements 33,000$ TBD X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability.The Police Station is in need of improvements including increased security measures and improvements to report writing room and evidence and property room. The restrooms in the basement of the Police Station are in need of improvements. PBG 698 ADA improvements 120,000$ Andrew Nguyen X Complete Final Engineering Design - 10/20 06/21 Final Engineering Design. Finalizing plans and specifications. The project proposes: Improvements and relocation of sidewalks, curb ramps and obstructions along Prospect Avenue in order to follow the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meet the latest Federal Standards. Project to be bided out together with Project 601. Categories: SH = Street/Highway SSD = Sewer/Storm Drain PI = Parks PBG = Public Building and Ground 3 of 4 350 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 7.21.20 FY 2020-21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Grey indicates projects on hold. Project CategoryCIP No.Project Name Project Budget Project Manager Study/Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutTentative Date to Next Milestone/ Update Estimated Project Completion Date Current Project Status Project Description SH 101 Hermosa Avenue Greenwich Village Street Realignment (STUDY) 10,000$ TBD X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Secure design services as part of Study 103 Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment Grant. This study will evaluate potential improvements at the intersections of: • Hermosa Avenue and Greenwich Village; and • Manhattan Avenue and Greenwich Village/27th Street The study will evaluate opportunities improve the flow and visibility for pedestrian, bikes, and vehicles at the two intersections. This study is part of Study 103 Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment Grant recipient for preliminary design. PBG 103 Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment (NEW) (STUDY) 279,058$ TBD X TBD TBD Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability.This study will assess the risk of sea level rise in three areas along Hermosa Avenue, 35th Street, Greenwich Village, and 4th Street to Herondo Avenue. It incorporates three other projects. Project 164 Hermosa Avenue Green Street, Project 188 Strand Bikeway and Walkway Improvements at 35th Street, and Study 101 Hermosa Avenue Greenwich Village Street Realignment. PI 538 Citywide Park Master Plan (STUDY) 215,475$ Leeanne Singleton X TBD TBD Study/Conceptual Planning.The City is seeking to prepare a Parks Master Plan that achieves the following goals: • Engages the community and local recreational organizations in a dialogue about parks and open space resources in Hermosa Beach; • Identifies the current demand/utilization and the future/evolving parks and recreational facility needs for the Hermosa Beach community; • Leverages the vision and goals of the recently adopted General Plan and the Community Decision-Making Tool; • Identifies an appropriate balance between organized and informal recreational activities at the City’s parks and open spaces; • Serves as a dynamic useful planning and implementation document that enjoys broad community and political support; • Provides a comprehensive strategy to maintain, rehabilitate and improve the City’s network of parks, facilities, and open space assets, including current unfunded park and recreational opportunities; • Evaluates the effective use of the City’s financial and physical resources and opportunities to fund implementation of the recommendations in the Master Plan. PI 544 Greenbelt Accessible Path Assessment (STUDY) 10,000$ TBD X TBD TBD On Hold. Secure design services to prepare a conceptual design/feasibility of a path on the Green Belt. Determine the feasibility of installing an ADA surface path on the Greenbelt to provide a firm, natural looking and permeable path that increases accessibility for the disabled and boosts accessibility for all. PBG 668 Library Community Needs Assessment (STUDY) 42,522$ Kelly Orta X TBD TBD On Hold. On hold until funding opportunities become available for a new or renovated library facility. Phase II consists of preparation of conceptual designs and estimates for: • Keeping the city’s library at its current location, to include: Renovation and expansion of existing building or adding a second floor to the existing building (before preparation of renovation schemes for the existing building, the structural condition must be assessed to make sure that the building is not beyond its useful life); Construction of a two (2) story library building at the existing location; or • Construction of a new library at a new site • Relocation of “Friends of the Library” from Bard Street to a more appropriate location. Funding is reimbursed to the City through the Library’s Excess Operating Funds through agreement with the LA County Library. Other funding options will be explored. PBG 693 Community Theater Needs Assessment (STUDY) 79,295$ Kelly Orta X Complete Final Engineering Design - 10/20 12/20 Final Engineering Design. Consultant preparing final assessment reports.This needs assessment will include an analysis and conceptual cost estimates of two scenarios: a. A major renovation of the Community Theatre to transform it into a regional performing arts center; and b. A conservative renovation to upgrade the Community Theatre, taking into consideration its current users and maintaining the community focus of the facility. Market trends for similar and/or other theaters will also be included. PBG 694 Parking Structure (Lot C) Structural Assessment (STUDY) 40,000$ Andrew Nguyen X TBD TBD Study/Conceptual Planning. Consultant to prepare a structural assessment report.Prepare a structural assessment report for the parking structure, to analyze cracks in walls and decks. Categories: SH = Street/Highway SSD = Sewer/Storm Drain PI = Parks PBG = Public Building and Ground 4 of 4 351 You need to completely change the above question to permit the selection of No Concerns and yo not force the respondent to prioritize items that they aren't concerned about! You are preventing people like myself from being able to respond to the survey because I cannot ignore the question to continue. I have lived at 15th and (1413) Prospect for 20 YEARS! Both my wife and I work from home and we have clear view of Prospect Ave from 15th almost down to the traffic light a Aviation and I can tell you for a FACT that I have watched countless people cross Prospect diagonally from 15th heading South to 14th and NEVER ONCE have I heard a car honk, the sound of skidding tires due to an emergency braking nor have I EVER seen or heard a pedestrian or cyclist respond as if they felt a car threatened their safety crossing the street! I have NEVER seen a driver be impatient or upset at the many pedestrians crossing the street. In fact quite the opposite - ALL drivers have slowed or come to a complete stop well before any pedestrian crossing the street! I am however seriously annoyed at the fact that the totally unnecessary STOP sign at 17th pulses traffic out in perfect spacing to cause me SUBSTANTIAL delays and risk in being able to get out of my driveway. That same STOP sign is what also causes pedestrians to become impatient when trying to cross Prospect at 15th occasionally running across because of the continuous flow of cars!! I can also say for a FACT - that I have to back out of my driveway and NEVER have I had any issue with approaching cars not yielding if necessary (not that I ever intentionally back out in front of oncoming traffic). While there are occasional cars that go by at about 30-33 mph (which looks fast to the untrained eye) - I also know that my observed speeds as accurate! You know why?? Because your speed nag sign is right across the street from my house and easily seen providing me with ACCURATE speeds of passing traffic. These speeds represent the PEAK speeds of vehicles on the LONGEST stretch of Proepct Ave WITHOUT and STOP signs!! That should say something. My neighbor at 1513 Prospect is a cyclist and quite a bit older than myself. He has NEVER complained about traffic on Prospect. My other neighbor at 1411 has also complained about the same problem I have - pulsing traffic making it difficult for him to pull and out of his driveway. The ENTIRE PROBLEM on Prospect ARE THE UNNECESSARILY STOP SIGNS!! Not a single Stop sign is needed between Artesia and 190th!! They are responsible for scofflaws rolling them and serious congestion!! Prospect Ave is a thruway - like it or not!! I live on it and accept this!! I CHOSE to live here because Prospect offers easy access, substantial parking and is a nice wide street! I will STRENUOUSLY OBJECT to any changes that would remove parking and further restrict the flow of traffic!! Want to run a REAL experiment?!?! Remove ALL stop signs on Prospect and setup pedestrian activated lit/flashing yellow warning cross walks and watch what happens! Congestion will drop to almost nothing, overall average speed will not likely go up and PEAK speeds between the existing stop signs WILL BE REDUCED!! Pedestrians will be much safer crossing the street and Hermosa Beach will seriously reduce carbon emissions!! Every single unnecessary stop signs drives the speed between STOP signs UP!! Your own survey proved that!! You recorded an average 28MPH!! Do you have any idea what the PEAK speeds have to be in order to achieve that??? The existing, unnecessary STOP signs are a threat to pedestrian and vehicular safety (backing out of one's driveway) due to impatience resulting from traffic spacing and congestion!! Lastly - EVERY UNNECESSARY VEHICLE STOP SHOULD BE VIEWED AS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY due to the huge increase in CO2 emissions that such stops cause - 24 hours a day, every day of the year for EVERY SINGLE VEHICLE!! if you are serious about improving the environment AND making life better for US all while setting an example for other cities to follow then be bold and demonstrate how that is really possible - not make things even worse. Thank you for the followup. I am expressing my frustration at your Survey which IS CLEARLY BIASED towards eliciting a response for change(s) to Prospect that are just WRONG!! Your survey is absurdly biased and guaranteed to generate a skewed result!! I already suspect that this is all being engineered to give Justin Massey and his band of cohorts the 'data' to justify making changes to Prospect Ave that will make it worse for those of us that actually live on it as well as everyone that drives it!! 352 --- Bob Atkins On 7/24/2020 4:37 PM, Leeanne Singleton wrote: Good afternoon Prospect stakeholders, Thank you to those who were able to join us for our virtual community meeting this week to discuss traffic safety on the Prospect Corridor. As a follow up to our community meeting, we are interested in further soliciting your feedback to help identify and address the range of traffic safety concerns along the corridor through this temporary demonstration project. As you live, work, walk, and drive along this corridor, you see first hand what works and what, if anything, could be improved on Prospect. Our team is also working through the comments shared in the chat during the meeting and will follow up with individuals who asked specific questions during the meeting. You can take the short survey at the link below and we encourage you to share the survey with friends and neighbors. The survey is available on the City website and we will be sharing the survey and other resources via social media in the coming days if you'd like to share from there. Take the Prospect Ave Community Survey If you weren't able to join us for the meeting or are interested in staying involved through this project, Please check out the following resources: A Safer Prospect Project Website Family Friendly Activity: Conduct a Walk Audit and Share Your Observations Review the Slides from Wednesday's Presentation And if you are no longer interested in receiving updates on this project, please let me know via email and I will remove your contact info from our distribution list. Thank you and have a wonderful weekend.Leeanne Singleton, AICP, LEED AP Environmental Analyst | City of Hermosa Beach Phone: 310.318.0252 | Email: lsingleton@hermosabeach.gov COVID-19 updates: hermosabeach.gov/coronavirus 353 Sunday, July 26, 2020 RE: Ongoing issues vis-a-vis Granicus archival and play of "Virtual" Zoom mee ngs. Council and others: The following is a copy of a current email thread regarding issues of transparency resul ng from poor play/replay of "virtual' civic mee ngs uploaded to the Granicus archives, and the mely replay and o en defec ve replay of civic mee ngs on the city's cable channels, Spectrum Ch-8 and Fron er/FiOS Ch-31, due to ongoing assorted Audio/Video (A/V) issues. Howard Longacre (HB resident) Subject:Re: Video play problems with A Safer Prospect Virtual Presenta on and Q&A Session archived video on Granicus. Date:Sun, 26 Jul 2020 16:30:34 -0700 From:HBresident <HBresident@twc.com> To:Ann Yang <anny@hermosabeach.gov>, Leeanne Singleton <lsingleton@hermosabeach.gov> CC:Eduardo Sarmiento <esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov>, HB City Manager Suja Lowenthal <suja@hermosabeach.gov>, Councilmember Hany Fangary <hfangary@hermosabeach.gov>, Councilmember Michael Detoy <mdetoy@hermosabeach.gov>, Councilmember Stacey Armato <sarmato@hermosabeach.gov>, Mayor Pro Tem Jus n Massey <jmassey@hermosabeach.gov>, Mayor Mary Campbell <mcampbell@hermosabeach.gov> Thanks for your reply Ann, however, while I fully understand that I personally can download and play the 1 hr 24 min "Safer Prospect Avenue Presenta on and Q&A" video, and notwithstanding that I in fact DVD-recorded it when it occurred LIVE,please again understand that it is not me who needs to play the archived Granicus video.More importantly, it is others who need to be able to view and play this Granicus "Safer Prospect Q&A" video as they may desire. It's useless as archived if unplayable properly. Thus please carefully review my following addi onal reply, comments, and views which are for the benefit of all concerned, as with respect to my prior email and your reply to same below. Again, as an example, and as men oned in my email below, if you play the following, 4-mes longer, virtual Council mee ng, that's also Granicus-archived, it works and plays fine. Is it not a far larger file? What is different with its storage, or otherwise, in the Granicus archives? PART 1 - City Council Adjourned Regular Mee ng (Regular Session) Jul 14, 2020, 5hr-43min (a 4-mes longer mee ng that plays well from the Granicus archives) about:blank 1 of 4 7/26/2020, 6:15 PM 354 Also, why are i.e., Planning Commission mee ngs playing full screen so much be er, both live and replay on cable, than are Council mee ngs? I would highly suggest that the City Council direct that Suja, their personal Hermosa Beach city manager, who apparently does not care about such mundane stuff, seek out an audio/video digital recording, storage, replay, file formats, specialist, as clearly the ongoing problems in having mely replays, efficient Zoom mee ngs, etc, etc, instead of the o en defec ve, "black screen" cable replays, of the recorded mee ngs, both via city infrastructure and via the Granicus and Granicus archives is unconscionable in this year 2020. These are a func on of the Suja's mode of opera on and of non-A/V (audio/video) specialized staff not sufficiently understanding such stuff. Things worked far be er 20 years ago, however this is now a video digital age and a city needs support from those who fully understand digital A/V formats, so ware methods, storage, playback etc.. Suja's non-digital-A/V trained staff apparently are having to spin their wheels, was ng substan al amounts of their me, trying to understand such esoteric A/V stuff. Why i.e., does Suja have a costly "Environmental Programs Manager" and overhead, when basic func ons of the city are not being carried out? Is it because of personal agendas of two or possibly three self-serving councilmembers and the City Manager herself, using the city of Hermosa Beach to perhaps pad their personal wallets and advance their personal resumes at the city's residents' and businesses' expense? NOW, as a result, this A/V failed city func on has become a de facto scam to further keep residents and businesses in the dark, and in not having a clue as to what is going on in Hermosa Beach, ESPECIALLY during this period of the Covid-19 pandemic. Btw, at the moment of this wri ng, a June 9 council mee ng is replaying on the city's cable channels. While that's good, i.e., that something is replaying, this is now almost August and many important mee ngs since June 9 have not mely been replayed even once. The A/V (audio/video) upgrade work going on in the Council Chambers should have been accomplished while keeping the replays func oning far be er. I believe that this council chambers A/V work, which took some 5 years to even commence, is now being used as an excuse by Suja to keep this disastrous City Council / City Manager opera on from being viewed by the residents via mely replays of mee ngs. Again, whatever was accomplished to cause the above men oned, 4-mes longer, virtual council mee ng recording to play properly from the Granicus archives, needs to be accomplished for all the other "virtual" mee ng recordings, including the "Safer Prospect Virtual Presenta on and Q&A Session". Addi onally, an outrageous ac on by the City Council was the moving to an earlier me, the start of regular mee ngs from 7-PM to 6-PM, for their own personal benefit. Years ago the mee ngs were started at 7:30PM. Then at 7:10PM, and then even earlier to 7:00PM. When they were started earlier at 7-PM all prior councils understood that it was for the residents and businesses about:blank 2 of 4 7/26/2020, 6:15 PM 355 need, not for their own personal need, that mee ngs start no earlier than 7-PM. The present council, especially those of its three member majority of Stacey Armato, Jus n Massey, and Mary Campbell, have shown repeatedly just how self-obsessed, and self-serving they are. All three need to look no further than at the current disastrous U.S. President Trump to see many of the self- serving issues that they too so-selfishly and cavalierly exhibit. What unfortunately is really, really unconscionable is how virtually nothing of substance has been accomplished by this par cular Hermosa Beach city council to benefit the residents and businesses both pre- and during-Covid-19, i.e. paving streets in an ongoing comprehensive manner, or even fixing defec ve sidewalks. Virtually nothing. Not even the hiring of a "deputy city clerk" has been accomplished, but instead during this posi on being unfilled for ge ng close to two years now, a completely unneeded "environmental programs manager" was hired. That posi on could be eliminated today from Suja's bloated City Manager personal staff. Also Leeanne, could you please address on Monday the following which was included in my email which was addressed primarily to you. "I am s ll trying to locate the video/audio and minutes of the townhall that Councilmember Howard Fishman conducted in the council chambers regarding Prospect Avenue safety when he was on Council some 8 years ago. I recall that it was televised and it had a significant amount of oral and wri en input, which needs to be factored into the current Prospect discussion. Have you obtained that informa on and recording from that Prospect Avenue townhall conducted at Council's direc on by former Councilmember Howard Fishman?" On 7/26/2020 11:49 AM, Ann Yang wrote: Hi Howard, The new video is a large file. It will take me for the video to load. You could try downloading the video to your computer and watching it that way. Thank you, Ann From: HBresident <HBresident@twc.com> Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 2:37 AM To: Leeanne Singleton <lsingleton@hermosabeach.gov> Cc: Eduardo Sarmiento <esarmiento@hermosabeach.gov>; Ann Yang <anny@hermosabeach.gov> Subject: Video play problems with A Safer Prospect Virtual Presenta on and Q&A Session archived video on Granicus. Sunday early, 7/26/20 Hi Leeanne, When I tried to play the "A Safer Prospect Virtual Presenta on and Q&A Session" video on the Granicus the other day it seemed to work OK. about:blank 3 of 4 7/26/2020, 6:15 PM 356 h p://hermosabeach.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=6 However today it starts playing a er about 20 seconds and then if you pick a different point in the video me- slidebar it just hangs trying to reposi on to the selected point, I waited a while and it seemed to not catch up, it just kept twirling the indicator icon in the center of the player window. This was happening to the virtual council mee ngs originally but they now seem to immediately jump to the point you select in the me-slidebar. And I tried a other archived virtual mee ngs and they all worked fine on the Granicus, however again the "A Safer Prospect Virtual Presenta on and Q&A Session" video is not working, a er I made mul ple a empts. There may be some se ng or process that needs to be set up for such uploaded "virtual" videos, but again, the other day when it was first placed in the Granicus archives it was working ok when you would step through the video via clicking in the me-slidebar of the player window. Perhaps Eddie or Ann know what causes this issue. I don't know who uploaded it, however I and others do appreciate that it has been archived there. You might try it from a home computer and compare to a virtual council mee ng and see how it works for both star ng up and then selec ng another point in the video. Btw, I'm s ll trying to locate the video/audio and minutes of the townhall that Councilmember Howard Fishman conducted in the council chambers regarding Prospect Avenue when he was on Council some 8 years ago. I recall that it was televised and it had a significant amount of oral and wri en input which needs to be factored into the current discussion. Have you obtained the informa on and recording from that Prospect Avenue townhall? Thanks, Howard L. about:blank 4 of 4 7/26/2020, 6:15 PM 357 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0456 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 ACTION SHEET OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 21, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the action sheet of the Planning Commission meeting of July 21, 2020. Attachments: Action Sheet of the July 21, 2020 Planning Commission meeting Approved:Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Noted: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™358 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 City of Hermosa Beach Action Minutes - Draft Planning Commission Chair Peter Hoffman Vice Chair Michael Flaherty Commissioners Rob Saemann Marie Rice David Pedersen 7:00 PM Council ChambersTuesday, July 21, 2020 ******************************************************************************************************* THIS MEETING IS HELD PURSUANT TO EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 ISSUED BY GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM ON MARCH 17, 2020. ANY OR ALL PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS MAY ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE BY TELECONFERENCE/VIRTUAL MEETING. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE BY TELECONFERENCE. ******************************************************************************************************* 1. Call to Order Due to technical difficulties, the meeting start was delayed to 8:01 PM. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call Commissioner Rob Saemann, Chair Peter Hoffman, Vice Chair Michael Flaherty, Commissioner Marie Rice, and Commissioner David Pedersen Present:5 - Absent:0 All Planning Commissioners attended remotely. Also Present Remotely: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Patrick Donegan, Assistant City Attorney Christy Teague, Senior Planner Yuritzy Randle, Assistant Planner Melanie Emas, Assistant Planner 4. Oral Communications Attending remotely to speak: Beata Stylianos. Page 1City of Hermosa Beach DRAFT359 July 21, 2020Planning Commission Action Minutes - Draft a.REPORT 20-0447 Written Communications 1. Email from David GrethenAttachments: Section I CONSENT CALENDAR 5.REPORT 20-0448 Approval of the June 16, 2020 and June 22, 2020 Planning Commission Action Minutes June 16, 2020 Planning Commission action minutes June 22, 2020 Planning Commission action minutes Attachments: ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Rice and seconded by Commissioner Pedersen to approve the June 16, 2020 and June 22, 2020 action minutes. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Commissioner Saemann, Chair Hoffman, Vice Chair Flaherty, Commissioner Rice, and Commissioner Pedersen 5 - Absent:0 6. Resolution(s) for Consideration - None Section II PUBLIC HEARING 7.REPORT 20-0449 Information Only: Project Zoning Maps 1. Project Zoning MapsAttachments: 8.REPORT 20-0454 Precise Development Plan PDP 20-3 and Parking Plan PARK 20-1 request for conversion of an 11 unit non-conforming apartment building into a 9 unit hotel, including removal of 2 ground floor units and provision of 2 new parking spaces and determination that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Page 2City of Hermosa Beach DRAFT360 July 21, 2020Planning Commission Action Minutes - Draft 1. Resolution of Approval for Proposed Precise Development Plan 2. Resolution of Approval for Proposed Parking Plan 3. Current Inventory of City-approved Parking In-Lieu Spaces 4. Project Plans and Site Photos 5. Business Narrative 6. Business Management Plan to Minimize Neighborhood Impacts 7. Parking and Traffic Study 8. Link to City’s Downtown Rideshare Zones http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=28&recordid=1346 9. Public Notice Mailer and Radius Map 10. Public Notification Legal Posters 11. Memorandum Regarding SB330 (The Housing Crisis Act) and Coastal Act 12. Planning Commissioner Questions and Response Locations in Report 13. Supplemental - Letter from Albro Lundy, added 7-21-20 Attachments: Attending remotely to speak: Pablo Escutia, Greg McNaley, and Walter Franco. ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Saemann and seconded by Vice Chair Flaherty to adopt the resolution, as amended below, approving Precise Development Plan 20-3 to allow an existing 11-unit apartment building to be converted to a 9-unit hotel with 2 new parking spaces in the C-2 (Restricted Commercial) zoning district at 66 11th Street; and determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Condition of Approval (COA) #6: The business shall prevent unruliness and boisterous activities of the patrons on the outdoor patios, rooftop decks, outside of the hotel, or in the immediate area. COA #7: Architectural treatments and accessory facilities, as well as all landscaping, shall be as shown on building elevations, site and floor plans. Precise building height compliance shall be reviewed at the time of plan check, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. COA #8: The roof deck shall be closed and locked between hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. to minimize neighborhood impacts. COA # 9: No live entertainment, music, speakers, televisions, or audio or visual media of any type, whether amplified or unamplified, shall be provided within any outdoor area. COA #10: The roof deck shall not be accessible to the public. The number of people on the roof deck shall not exceed the posted maximum occupancy allowed by the Building and Fire Codes and shall in no case exceed 50 people. COA #11: Prior to the final of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the Community Development Director for review and approval a business management plan that includes the following: a. Identify all reasonably prudent business practices that the owner or owner’s authorized agent will use to ensure that occupants and/or guests will occupy the Page 3City of Hermosa Beach DRAFT361 July 21, 2020Planning Commission Action Minutes - Draft motel in a manner that complies with all applicable laws, rules, regulations, and permits. b. Identify all reasonably prudent business practices to ensure that the occupants and/or guests of the motel do not create unreasonable noise or disturbances, engage in disorderly conduct or illegal activity, or violate any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the motel. Upon notification that any occupant or guest of the motel has created unreasonable noise or disturbances, engaged in disorderly conduct, or committed violations of any applicable, law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the motel, respond in a timely and appropriate manner to immediately halt or prevent a recurrence of such conduct. c. Provide the name, address and telephone number of a local contact person who shall be available 24 hours per day, seven days per week for the purpose of responding to City staff and other motel guest calls pertaining to complaints regarding the condition, operations, or conduct of occupants of the motel or their guests and if directed by City staff, to personally proceed on-site within thirty (30) minutes from the call to resolve the problem. d. Identify all reasonably prudent business practices to ensure that the motel is used for overnight accommodations purposes only. This shall include using all prudent business practices to prohibit the rental to commercial party businesses. e. After-hours emergency contacts shall be posted at both entrances. New COA: A minimum of 3 security cameras shall be installed on the rooftop deck and monitored to ensure guest compliance with hours of use. Video recordings will be stored for 2 weeks and available to City authorities when requested. ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Saemann and seconded by Commissioner Pedersen to adopt the resolution, as presented, for Parking Plan 20-1. Both motions carried by the following vote: Aye:Commissioner Saemann, Chair Hoffman, Vice Chair Flaherty, Commissioner Rice, and Commissioner Pedersen 5 - Absent:0 This final action is subject to potential review by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 2.52 of the Municipal Code*; only the Precise Development Plan may be appealed to the City Council by any party if filed by August 10, 2020. Section III HEARING 9.REPORT 20-0452 S4 #39 SIGN REVIEW - Determination on whether a proposed display measuring approximately 3,376 square feet on the west facing building wall of the historic Bijou building located at 1221 Hermosa Avenue is a mural, and determination that the project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Sections 15301 and 15061(b)(3) under the California Environmental Page 4City of Hermosa Beach DRAFT362 July 21, 2020Planning Commission Action Minutes - Draft Quality Act (CEQA). 1. Draft Approval Resolution 2. Applicant Submittal 7-16 3. Applicant Supplemental Response 4. Site Photographs 5. Notice Poster Verification Attachments: Chair Hoffman and Vice Chair Flaherty recused themselves. Attending remotely to speak: Steve Izant. ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Rice and seconded by Commissioner Pedersen to adopt the resolution, as presented, determining that the proposed display covering 3,376 square feet of surface area on the west side of an existing building is consistent with the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) definition of ‘Mural’ at 1221 Hermosa Avenue (Bijou Building) and determine that the proposed project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Sections 15301 and 15061(b) (3) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The motion carried by the following vote, noting the recusal of Chair Hoffman and Vice Chair Flaherty: Aye:Commissioner Saemann, Commissioner Rice, and Commissioner Pedersen3 - Absent:0 Recused:Chair Hoffman, and Vice Chair Flaherty2 - This final action is subject to potential review by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 2.52 of the Municipal Code*. Section IV 10. Staff Items a.REPORT 20-0451 Receive Tri-Annual Report for On-Sale Alcoholic Beverage Conditional Use Permits 1. Process and Standards, updated 2019 2. Police/ABC Report for this period 3. Police/ABC Report for last period 4. Police Statistics for this period 5. Police Officer Checks for this period 6. Code Enforcement Data for this period 7. Code Enforcement Data for last period Attachments: Commissioner Rice noted the typo on page 7 of the staff report, which reported 21 sexual assaults. The actual count shall be updated in the report presented to the Planning Commission for the August 18, 2020 meeting. Page 5City of Hermosa Beach DRAFT363 July 21, 2020Planning Commission Action Minutes - Draft ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Rice and seconded by Vice Chair Flaherty to receive and file the report. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Commissioner Saemann, Chair Hoffman, Vice Chair Flaherty, Commissioner Rice, and Commissioner Pedersen 5 - Absent:0 b.REPORT 20-0445 Zoning Code Text Amendment to allow the use of mechanical vehicle lifts as a method to provide required parking. 1. Staff Report May 19, 2020 2. Planning Commission Resolution 20-13 3. Residential Parcels Less Than 2100 Square feet 4. Types of Vehicle Lifts (Photos) 5. Mechanics for a Single-Post Parking System 6. Mechanics of a Subterranean Vehicle Lift 7. Supplemental - eComments, added 7-20-20 8. Supplemental - eComments, added 7-21-20 Attachments: Attending remotely to speak: Kort Schnabel. ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Rice and seconded by Commissioner Pedersen to continue this item to the August 18, 2020 meeting. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Commissioner Saemann, Chair Hoffman, Vice Chair Flaherty, Commissioner Rice, and Commissioner Pedersen 5 - Absent:0 c. Verbal report on City Council actions Director Robertson to poll the Commission by email about the possibility of amending the meeting start time to an earlier time. d. Verbal status report on major Planning projects e.REPORT 20-0450 August 18, 2020 Planning Commission Tentative Future Agenda Items 1. Planning Commission August 18, 2020 Tentative Future AgendaAttachments: ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Rice and seconded by Commissioner Saemann to receive and file the August 18, 2020 tentative future agenda. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Commissioner Saemann, Chair Hoffman, Vice Chair Flaherty, Commissioner Rice, and Commissioner Pedersen 5 - Absent:0 Page 6City of Hermosa Beach DRAFT364 July 21, 2020Planning Commission Action Minutes - Draft f.REPORT 20-0455 Community Development Department Activity Report of November 2019 Community Development Department activity report of November 2019Attachments: ACTION: Motion by Commissioner Saemann and seconded by Commissioner Pedersen to receive and file the November 2019 activity report. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Commissioner Saemann, Chair Hoffman, Vice Chair Flaherty, Commissioner Rice, and Commissioner Pedersen 5 - Absent:0 11. Commissioner Items 12. Recognition of Commissioner Michael Flaherty’s Service 13. Adjournment Motion to adjourn made by Vice Chair Flaherty. Chair Hoffman adjourned the meeting at 11:19 PM. *Chapter 2.52, Section 2.52.040 of the Municipal Code provides for Council review and reconsideration of any decision of the Planning Commission by two affirmative votes at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting. In the event the Council initiates a review, the review will be placed on a future agenda of City Council within a reasonable time period, and the Commission’s decision is stayed pending Council’s review and final decision. Page 7City of Hermosa Beach DRAFT365 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0457 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the August 18, 2020 Planning Commission tentative future agenda items. Attachments: Planning Commission August 18, 2020 Tentative Future Agenda Respectfully submitted by: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™366 \\CHB-FS-01\Vol1\B95\CD\PC\Future Items\Tent. Future Agendas\Planning Commission Tentative Agenda for 8-18-20.docx Revised 07/16/2020 1:00 PM Tentative Future Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION City of Hermosa Beach August 18, 2020 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Project Title Public Notice Meeting Date 2629 Manhattan Avenue – Conditional Use Permit for roof mounted wireless (Verizon) 8/6/20 8/18/20 Text Amendment for Vehicle Lifts 8/6/20 8/18/20 Triannual CUP Review Hearing n/a 8/18/20 Annual Progress Report and Housing Update for 2019 n/a 8/18/20 Upcoming and Pending Projects Discussion of historic resource eligibility and evaluation for new projects 911 1st Street – Zone and General Plan Amendment, Precise Development Plan and Planned Unit Development for multiple unit condominium project City Yard – Precise Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Environmental Review Limited Live Entertainment Permits 2-year Pilot Program expiration November 2020 Trans Pacific Fiber Optic Cable – Environmental Impact Report Certification and Project Entitlements – alternative sites at 6th Street or 10th Street 367 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0481 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 APPROVE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND STAR EDUCATION TO PROVIDE CHILDCARE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN ENROLLED IN THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT (Community Resources Manager Kelly Orta) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1.Approve a three-year lease agreement with STAR Education to provide childcare services for children enrolled in the Hermosa Beach City School District; and 2.Add estimated lease revenue of $19,115 to the 2020-21 Budget. Executive Summary: In July 2015,the City entered into a lease agreement with STAR Education,a non-profit organization based out of Los Angeles,to utilize classroom 7 and the courtyard of the Community Center to provide daycare services and enrichment programming for children attending kindergarten in the Hermosa Beach City School District (HBCSD).The current lease agreement expires July 31,2020. Staff recommends the approval of the proposed,three-year lease agreement allowing STAR to continue utilizing the space to provide necessary programming and childcare services to the community. Background: In July 2015,the City entered into a lease agreement with STAR Education (STAR)to utilize classroom 7 and the courtyard of the Community Center to provide daycare services and enrichment programming for children attending kindergarten in the Hermosa Beach City School District (HBCSD).Due to impacted enrollment at that time,the HBCSD transitioned its kindergarten program from a full day to a half day schedule.The STAR program successfully filled the gap of care opposite of when children were attending the district’s kindergarten program.The offering of this program has been highly beneficial for a number of families with approximately thirty children enrolled in each session (morning and afternoon)prior to its closure in March 2020 due to COVID-19 precautionary measures.The current lease agreement that supports this program is scheduled to expire July 31, City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™368 Staff Report REPORT 20-0481 2020. Discussion: STAR is a non-profit organization based out of Los Angeles that provides recreational and enrichment programming for school-aged children in a variety of programs and settings.STAR’s team developed the Hermosa Beach program collectively with staff and HBCSD representatives and created a state licensed childcare program that met the needs of the community.The partnership between the City and STAR has been positive and its program has been able to take place amongst other activities in the Community Center without concern or conflict. As STAR begins planning its program for the upcoming school year,there is a level of uncertainty due to the COVID-19 precautionary measures many school districts are forced to comply with.On July 17,Governor Gavin Newson ordered schools in Los Angeles County,among others across the State,to plan for virtual instruction when school resumes in the fall.This health order allows for waivers to be granted to school districts that would approve the re-opening of in-person instruction for students in grades TK through sixth.It is still unknown how HBCSD will provide instruction to its students this fall,which has implications on the program(s)offered by STAR.Staff remains committed to working with STAR to reimagine its program(s),if necessary,to supplement the educational and social components provided by the school district.Therefore,the proposed lease agreement removes the “kindergarten”distinction of the STAR program to provide flexibility that would allow STAR to continue utilizing the space for program(s)that best fit the needs of the community for the upcoming school year. The proposed lease agreement is for a period of three (3)years commencing August 1,2020 through July 31,2023.Additionally,this lease may be extended for one additional one-year term at the exclusive discretion of the City.The lease agreement provides exclusive use of classroom 7 and the courtyard during the daily program times.Additionally,the proposed lease agreement provides opportunities for STAR to utilize the 2nd Story Theatre for additional programming opportunities when it is available.Considering the level of programmatic changes that may take place to align the program with the plans for the upcoming school year,the proposed agreement provides the City an opportunity to terminate if the STAR program was no longer fitting the needs of the community.This would only be exercised following failed attempts to address it in coordination with staff,HBCSD representatives, and STAR representatives. Finally,the lease agreement requires a monthly payment of $1,593.03.This cost is consistent with recommended rates following a market analysis completed for the development of the municipal lease policy. The previous lease agreement with STAR required a $1 per year annual rental fee. General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™369 Staff Report REPORT 20-0481 General Plan. Relevant policies are listed below: Parks & Open Space Element Goal 2. Abundant parks, open space, and recreational facilities to serve the community. Policies: ·2.1 Diverse programs and facilities.Offer diverse recreational programs and facilities to meet the needs of all residents. ·2.5 Shared use agreements.Work with adjacent jurisdictions,the school district,and private facilities to offer recreational opportunities or activities not available at City of Hermosa Beach facilities. Goal 3. Community parks and facilities encourage social activity and interaction. Policies: ·3.6 Availability of City facilities.Consider the demand and availability of City facilities for general community use in the long-term lease and/or rental of City facilities. Fiscal Impact: The City will collect $1,593.03 monthly in rental fees, which will total $19,116.36 annually. The previous annual lease payment of $1 was assumed at the time the 2020- 21 Budget was prepared. The additional estimated lease revenue of $19,115 will be added to the 2020- 21 Budget. Attachments: 1. Proposed Lease Agreement with STAR Education Respectfully Submitted by: Kelly Orta, Community Resources Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™370 1 HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Lease Agreement (“Lease” or “Agreement”) is made and entered into on this ____ day of July, 2020, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a California Municipal Corporation (City) and STAR Education (Lessee). RECITALS A. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Community Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). B. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February, 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leas e and are referred to herein respectively as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. C. Lessee previously utilized a portion of the facility through a lease agreement that expires July 31, 2020. D. Lessee desires to continue its use of a portion of the facility and the City is willing to lease a portion of the facility to Lessee on the terms and conditions set out herein, which terms are consistent with both the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the promises and obligations set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Term. The term of this lease shall be for either (i) a period of three (3) years commencing on the 1st day of August 2020 and ending on the 31st day of July 2023, or (ii) until the Hermosa Beach City School District determines the STAR program is no longer needed, whichever is sooner. At lessee’s request, this lease may be extended for one additional term of one year in the exclusive discretion of the City. Any such request shall be made in writing in advance of the expiration of the then current term. 2. Description of Premises. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility (the “premises”) described as follows: a. Exclusive use of room 7 and the courtyard when the program is in session; and b. Use of the 2nd Story Theatre, as needed. Use of this space requires pre- approval and coordination with City at least 24 hours in advance. 3. Rent. Lessee agrees to pay to the City $1,593.03 monthly, payable on the first day of each month. 4. Condition pertaining to the Premises. Lessee shall adhere to the following additional conditions pertaining to the premises: a. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or i ron work without Lessor's written consent. b. All remodel work shall receive prior approval of the Lessor. 371 2 c. There are exposed sewer and water lines in the ceiling. These lines carry liquids that could damage material stored in the room if the lines ar e disturbed or ruptured. In addition, a pipe that may be wrapped with an asbestos material crosses the ceiling area and is not to be disturbed i n any manner. _______ (Initial) d. The City will maintain the premises to the standards of childcare licensing requirements. 5. Use. Lessee shall use the premises exclusively for the following use: a. Lessee will provide recreational and enrichment programming for school-age children enrolled in the Hermosa Beach City School District. b. Program time may be held from 7:00am – 6:00pm. 6. Transportation. Lessee is not responsible for transporting children to or from the Community Center and View School. The City will provide this transportation service with a qualified bus transportation provider. 7. Insurance Liability. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement, Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $2,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $2,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $2,000,000 for property damage or a combined single limit of $2,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, ele cted officials and members of Boards of Commissions as additional insured par ties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endor sements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificates(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: a. The additional insured requested; b. Thirty-day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; c. Insurance is primary to that of the Additional I nsured; d. Coverage included; and e. Cross-liability clause. Worker’s Compensation Insurance. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement, Worker’s compensation and Employers Liability insurance and furnish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be canceled or materially ch anged without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. Insurance Companies. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best’s Insurance Rating Guide. 8. Condition of the Premises Upon Termination of th e Lease. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good condition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Lessee took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alter ations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon demand the reasonable sums to repair th e premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 372 3 9. Construction. Lessee is prohibited from making any alterations performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 10. Destruction, Partial Destruction or Necessity to Repair because of Conditions Caused by Other than Lessee. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the premises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction of repair if such reconstruction or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be terminated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 11. Hold Harmless. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any direct or indirect act or any omission of the Lessee, its officers, agents and employees arising out of the Lessee's use of said premises. The Lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all action, suits or other proceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 12. Rules, Regulations and Ordinances. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Community Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 13. Taxes and Charges. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 14. Default. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pursuant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obli gation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the S tate of California. 15. Notice. Any notice required to be made or given pursuant to the provisions of this lease may be either personally served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Lessor: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA. 90254 Lessee: STAR Education 10117 Jefferson Blvd. Culver City, CA 90232 Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this para graph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 373 4 16. Attorney’s Fees. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing par ty may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of da mages its attorney’s fees. 17. Assignment and Subletting. Lessee may not sublease all or any portion of the premises without the written consent of the City, which consent may be granted or denied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 18. Successors. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. 19. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision of this lease both parties reserve the right to terminate the lease at any time and without cause upon giving 30 days written notice to other party. In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first herein above set forth. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a Municipal Corporation, Lessor ________________________________ Mayor, Mary Campbell ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: Executive Director 374 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0486 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 EASY READER 50th ANNIVERSARY AD (City Manager Suja Lowenthal) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council consider a request from Mayor Mary Campbell and Mayor Pro Tem Massey funding a half-or full-page ad celebrating the Easy Reader's 50th anniversary and encouraging constituents and South Bay neighbors to support a free and local press. Background: Founded in 1970,the Easy Reader is a weekly newspaper published every Thursday and delivered to homes in Hermosa Beach,Manhattan Beach,and Redondo Beach (Beach Cities/South Bay, California),with a circulation of approximately 45,000 weekly (70,000 first Thursdays include Palos Verdes),offering local news and extensive entertainment listings.It is the legally adjudicated newspaper for the cities of Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach. Fiscal Impact: The Cost of a half page ad in the Easy Reader is approximately $600. The Cost of a full-page ad in the Easy Reader is approximately $1100. Funds for this are available in the Perspective Expenditures account. Respectfully Submitted by: Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™375 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0480 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 C 42 #9- CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR A MURAL DISPLAY MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 3,376 SQUARE FEET ON THE WEST FACING BUILDING WALL OF THE HISTORIC BIJOU BUILDING LOCATED AT 1221 HERMOSA AVENUE AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15301 AND 15061(B)(3) UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) Recommended Action: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution,thereby approving a Certificate of Appropriateness (C 42 #9)for a mural display measuring approximately 3,376 square feet on the west facing building wall of the historic Bijou building located at 1221 Hermosa Avenue and determining that the project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Sections 15301 and 15061(b)(3) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Executive Summary: The applicant,Hermosa Beach Murals Project (HBMP),submitted a proposal for a mural display measuring approximately 3,376 square feet on the west facing building wall of the of the Bijou Theater Building.Since the Bijou Theater Building is a historical landmark,Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC)Section 17.53.150 requires approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness prior to conducting any improvement on the property. Background: The subject site is located on the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and the building occupies the entire property between 13th Street and 13th Court with the primary building frontage facing Hermosa Avenue to the east.The site has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Recreational Commercial and is within the General Commercial (C-2)zone.The 14,031 square foot parcel is currently improved with a 24,860 square foot three-story building known as the Bijou Building. Constructed in 1923,the neoclassical revival building served as a first run live vaudeville theater and City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 10 powered by Legistar™376 Staff Report REPORT 20-0480 Constructed in 1923,the neoclassical revival building served as a first run live vaudeville theater and motion picture house.Additionally,the building housed office space,commercial storefront,and the local Masonic lodge on the third floor. In 1999,a historic resource survey (Attachment 5)was conducted;at which time it was determined the building was eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places due to the distinctive architectural style and the building exemplified the early social and economic history of Hermosa Beach.In 1999,the City designated the Bijou Building as a historical landmark pursuant to HBMC Section 15.53.070 (Historical Preservation Ordinance). An application was filed on July 1,2020 by Hermosa Beach Mural Projects,seeking determination of whether the proposed mural display covering approximately 3,376 square feet of the west side of an existing building is consistent with the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC)definition of “Mural.” On July 21,2020,the Planning Commission approved the applicants request and determined pursuant to HBMC Section 17.50.130.B,it was appropriate to waive the specific provisions of the sign code pertaining to sign area,coverage,height,type and style for the 3,376 sq.ft.mural display because the display meet the definition of a mural. Since the Project shall be located on the Bijou Theater Building,Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC)Section 17.53.150 requires approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness prior to conducting any improvement on the property. Discussion: The applicant is proposing a mural display measuring approximately 3,376 square feet on the west facing building wall of the Bijou Theater Building.The proposed display depicts an image of the historic Sand &Surf Club a.k.a.the Hermosa Biltmore Hotel and was designed by artist,John Pugh. The proposed display would cover the entirety of the west-building wall.The proposed image provides the illusion of a hidden layer of history being unveiled beneath the Bijou building wall and depicts an image of the Biltmore Hotel.The display is a tribute to the demolished hotel which once stood where Noble Park is now located. The mural display would be applied using a combination of painting directly on the existing wall and applying a painted fabric to the existing wall.The top portion of mural display would be applied as a painted fabric,while the lower portion would be painted directly to the building surface.A thin base of protective sealer would be applied to the outermost stucco layer of west building wall to prepare for the application of the mural.The thin base coat would then have a very thin net applied,in order to prevent future cracking of the display.The skim coat (which is a thin plaster to smoothen the surface) would be applied over the net.The painted fabric would then be applied to the skim coat surface.The painted fabric must be applied to a smooth surface and cannot be applied to the existing stucco, which would otherwise compromise the integrity and durability of the fabric surface and appearance. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 2 of 10 powered by Legistar™377 Staff Report REPORT 20-0480 The Project will take approximately five weeks to complete.A freestanding outrigger scaffold would be installed in the City’s parking (Lot B)adjacent to the west-facing building wall for the application of the mural.Due to the size,the scaffold would occupy eight public parking spaces for the duration of the project.The applicant also proposes to add additional lighting to the existing lampposts in parking lot (Lot B) in order to illuminate the mural display during evening hours. This project was reviewed and inspected by City staff,which found that all work conformed to the Secretary of Interior’s standards for historical resource restoration.City staff used a previous report conducted by Environmental Science Association (ESA)for the City of Hermosa Beach for a Certificate of Appropriateness Review for a proposed tenant improvements (Project)at 1221 Hermosa Avenue,Hermosa Beach,California (“1221 Hermosa Avenue”or “Project Site”)by Gensler for Beach City Capital (Tenant),dated September 12,2019 and the 1999 Architectural Resources Survey Report of the Bijou Theater Building prepared by PCR Services Corporation for the City of Hermosa Beach,to evaluate the federal,state and local historical significance of the Bijou Theater Building based upon criteria used by the National Register of Historic Places,the California Register of Historic Resources,the City of Hermosa Beach Historic Resource Preservation Ordinance,and survey methodology of the State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP),to analyze the project’s compliance with the Secretary of Interior’s standards for historical resource restoration.Staff found the Project would retain and preserve the historic character of the Neoclassical style Bijou Building and would not result in the removal,destruction,or alteration of any character-defining features that contribute to the subject property’s significance as a historical resource. Exterior Character-Defining Features The 1999 Architectural Resource Survey Report describes the composition of the building as symmetrical and formal and continues to state that,“though the entire building is constructed of unreinforced red brick,the primary façade and those small portions of the south and north façades which wrap around the store fronts and can be seen from Hermosa Avenue are clad in terra cotta,” and continues to say,“other than the terra cotta veneer that wraps around the store front corners,the north and south elevations contain little exterior ornamentation.The south elevation is divided by pilasters and punctuated by three recessed entries,two standard single doors exits and one large stage door all which retain their original wooden doors and arched entryways.The north elevation is also divided by pilasters and contains three entries.However,the doors and entryways have been modified on this elevation and do not retain their original material and configuration.Both the north and south elevations have fire escapes attached to them.The west (rear)elevation is completely void of ornamentation,fenestration,and entryways.Only a small,rectangular shaped vent opening highlights this façade.”The exterior character-defining features of the Bijou Building identified in the report include: ·Brick exterior walls clad with stucco walls (integrity of materials) City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 3 of 10 powered by Legistar™378 Staff Report REPORT 20-0480 ·Ornate terra cotta facade ·Electric trolley hooks ·Cast terra cotta ornamentation,including spandrels,pilasters,entry surrounds,and decorative cornice ·Roof forms and materials,including parapets,roofline balustrade,and fly tower at the west end of the auditorium roof ·Symmetrical composition massing ·Original wood-framed windows where they are extant ·Fenestration patterns ·Recessed foyer and multi-door entry Photo from the Hermosa Beach Historical Society & Museum Secretary of the Interior’s Standards (Standards) Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),a project that follows the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating,Restoring,and Reconstructing,Historic Buildings or the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (1995),Weeks and Grimmer,(Standards)shall be considered as mitigated to a level of less than a significant impact on the Historical Resource.The Standards were developed by the U.S.Department of the Interior as a means to evaluate and approve work on historic buildings for federal grants and rehabilitation tax credits.The Standards are codified at 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)Section 67.7.CEQA recognizes the value of the Standards by using them to demonstrate that a project that generally follows the Standards shall be considered as mitigated to a level of less than a significant impact and may be approved without an EIR.8 See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15331 and 15064.5(b)(3). However,failure to strictly comply with the Standards may not result in significant impacts to a historical resource if the project does not result in material impairment that would detract from its City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 4 of 10 powered by Legistar™379 Staff Report REPORT 20-0480 historical resource if the project does not result in material impairment that would detract from its eligibility. Analysis of Project Impacts As mentioned above,the mural display will be applied using a combination of painting directly on the existing wall,and applying a painted fabric to the existing wall.The top portion of mural display will be applied as a painted fabric,while the lower portion will be painted directly to the building surface.The applicant reports that in 2010 and 2019 a spray coating was plastered on the west building elevation. Both the painted fabric and the painted mural display will be applied over the sprayed coating.The applicant has provided a painting from the Hermosa Beach Historic Society &Museum demonstrating that the original brick building finish lies underneath the existing stucco.As evidenced in the picture below form the Historical Society,to the extent the west side contributed at all to the character defining features,the contributing feature of the west building wall was brick not stucco. Although stucco has been vaguely referenced as defining-characteristic,the mural display will be applied to the west facing building wall and the west-building wall was elevated in the 1999 survey as completely void of ornamentation,fenestration and entryways.On the contrary,character-defining features of the east,north and south were described in elaborate detail in the 1999 survey.Thus, while the painted fabric may impact the existing stucco (which is already altered and covered by a spray coating),the brick underneath,will not be affected by the mural display.A condition of approval has been added to the resolution to ensure that the existing stucco shall be repaired to its original state prior to the application of the mural. In addition,since the proposed freestanding scaffolding will not be affixed to the west-building wall, the scaffolding will impact neither the stucco nor the brick.The east (primary),north,and south building walls will not be affected by the Project as the mural will be displayed only one the west facing building wall. Finally,the proposed lighting shall be placed on existing lamppost located in the public parking lot and not on the historic building. The Project’s compliance with the secretary of interior standards are described in greater detail below, as further evidence that the mural will not significantly the resource. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards Review Standard 1:A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. The Project will not alter the use of the building because the project consists of a mural display on the exterior west facing building stucco wall and the use of the building as a mixed-use commercial City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 5 of 10 powered by Legistar™380 Staff Report REPORT 20-0480 building will be preserved.Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 1. Standard 2:The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved.The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features,spaces,and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. The applicant reports that there is an existing spray coating that was placed on the west-building wall sometime in 2010.The applicant retained a stucco contractor to evaluate the integrity of the western building wall,in anticipation of the potential application of a mural.The stucco contractor’s analysis substantiated the applicant’s belief that there is a spray coating covering the west-building wall of the Bijou Theatre Building (commonly known by one of its popular trade name as “Tex-Cote”).Although generally permits are not required for sprayed coating,permit records demonstrate that in 2019,the City’s Public Works Department issued an encroachment permit for “rolling scaffolding for use in exterior painting”.The applicant has also provided a photo from the Historic Society of the existing west building elevation to demonstrate that the existing stucco coating was applied over the building’s original brick.The Project includes applying both the painted fabric and the paint directly onto the west-building wall.As noted earlier in the report,a skim coat (thin plaster)will be applied to the upper portion of the west-building wall,in order to smooth out the stucco for the application of the painted fabric.A condition of approval has been added to the resolution to ensure that if the mural were to be removed,the stucco would be repaired to the pre-existing condition prior to the application of the mural.The historical character below the spray coating will not be affected by the mural display.Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 2. Standard 3:Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time,place,and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development,such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. Elements from other historic properties will not be added to the existing building as part of the mural display.As noted above,although stucco has been tangentially referenced as a defining- characteristic,the mural display will be applied to the west facing building wall and the west-building wall was elevated in the 1999 survey as completely void of ornamentation,fenestration and entryways.While,character-defining features of the east,north and south were described in elaborate detail in the 1999 survey.Thus,the mural display will not disrupt the character-defining features such as the column and cornice detailing of the building as present on the east,north and south building walls,which are of the grand theater that has been restored.Therefore,the Project would conform to Standard 3. Standard 4:Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. The mural display will be applied to the west facing building wall and will not affect the east (primary),City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 6 of 10 powered by Legistar™381 Staff Report REPORT 20-0480 The mural display will be applied to the west facing building wall and will not affect the east (primary), north and south building elevations.In addition,as noted in the standards 2 and 3,it can be argued that the exiting stucco the west facing building wall is not a distinctive feature that characterize the property and only the spray coating will be affected (which actually covers up the original brick that exists under the stucco and is more illustrative of the building’s history as shown in the picture from the historical society).The significant character defining features present on the east,north and south building walls will be preserved,and the character-defining features will not be disrupted.Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 4. Standard 5:Distinctive materials,features,finishes,and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. The Project would retain the distinctive materials,features,finishes,construction techniques and examples of craftsmanship that characterize the Bijou Building.The Project is limited to the west facing building wall and will only affect the sprayed coating on top of the stucco,which covers up the original brick.The character-defining features located on east,north and south facing building walls identified in the Architectural Resource Survey will remain completely unaffected by the project. Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 5. Standard 6:Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced.Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature,the new feature will match the old in design,color,texture,and,where possible,materials.Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. The Project involves repairing existing cracks on the west facing building wall by filling the existing cracks with plaster,in order to apply the mural display on a smooth surface.As noted above,the west -building wall has an existing spray coat.The repairs will be made directly to the sprayed coating.In addition,the project does not involve replacing any historic features,as the elements of interest are on the other facades.The Architectural Resource Survey report does not identify any defining characteristic specific to the west building façade.The historic architectural features of the building, notably its terra cotta ornamentation,are on the north,south and east facades and will not be impacted by the proposed mural display.Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 6. Standard 7:Chemical or physical treatments,if appropriate,will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. The proposed skim coating (thin plaster)and the thin layer of adhesive will be applied to the existing sprayed coating and not on top of the original building finish.In addition,the applicant consulted with the City’s Historical Society to ensure that the appropriate measures were taken to ensure that the proposed design was carefully thought out and well planned.Therefore,the Project would City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 7 of 10 powered by Legistar™382 Staff Report REPORT 20-0480 conform to Standard 7. Standard 8:Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place.If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. Standard 8 is not applicable to the project,as the Project does not involve disturbance of archeological resources.The mural display will be applied to an existing building wall and mural preparation will not involve trenching or disturbance of soil. Standard 9:New additions,exterior alterations,or related new construction will not destroy historic materials,features,and spatial relationships that characterize the property.The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials,features,size,scale,and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. The addition of the mural display on the west-facing building will not destroy the historic materials of the building.The east,north and south building walls will remain completely unaffected by the Project,which hold significant characteristic value to the historic property,as identified in the 1999 survey.In addition,conditions of approval have been added for the Certificate of Appropriateness to ensure that the scaffolding will not be attached to the west-building wall,and if the mural display were to be removed the stucco shall be restored to its pre-existing condition prior to the application of the mural display.Final,the mural will enhance the spatial relationships that characterize the property. The image will provide the illusion of a hidden layer of history being unveiled beneath the Bijou building wall and will depict and image of the Biltmore Hotel.The display is a tribute to the demolished hotel which once stood nearby where Noble Park is now located.Therefore,the Project would conform to Standard 9. Standard 10:New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that,if removed in the future,the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. The Project would not result in the construction of any additions to the Bijou Building.Moreover, Condition of approval have been added to the Certificate of Appropriateness to ensure that the addition of the proposed mural display to the existing stucco on the west facing building wall will be restores to its pre-existing condition before the application of the mural display.If removed in the future,the Bijou Building’s integrity as a locally designated property would remain unimpaired. Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 10. Environmental Determination The proposed project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Sections 15301 and 15061(b)(3)under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)because the project involves minor exterior alterations to an existing facility.Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)(3)generally,a project thatCity of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 8 of 10 powered by Legistar™383 Staff Report REPORT 20-0480 to an existing facility.Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)(3)generally,a project that follows the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving,Rehabilitating,Restoring,and Reconstructing Historic Buildings or the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (1995),(Weeks and Grimmer),shall be considered as mitigated to a level of less than a significant impact on the historical resource.The building is a designated historic resource and while a temporary alteration to the exterior,this action is found to be categorically exempt from CEQA as defined in Sections 15301 and 15061(b)(3),Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation,because the mural project involves minor and temporary exterior alterations to an existing facility,in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving,Rehabilitation,Restoring and Reconstruction Historic Buildings.There is no evidence in the record that the temporary mural on the west façade will impact the character defining features of the resource. General Plan Consistency: PLAN Hermosa,the City’s General Plan,was adopted by the City Council in August 2017.The Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed mural display support the PLAN Hermosa goal and policy listed below. Link to General Plan:<https://www.hermosabeach.gov/home/showdocument?id=9872> Land Use and Design Goal 5.Quality and authenticity in architecture and site design in all construction and renovation of buildings. ·5.5 Preservation and adaptive reuse Provide incentives for the preservation or adaptive reuse of historic structures and iconic landmarks. Fiscal Impact: The project consists of installing a freestanding outrigger scaffold near the west facing building wall in order to apply the mural display on the west wall.The applicant projects that the proposed freestanding scaffold would occupy eight parking spaces for the duration of the project (five weeks) starting in October 2020 through November 2020 which would result in a maximum estimated loss of parking meter revenue of $6,720 for 24 hours/day or $4,340 for peak hours of 10:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m. Attachments: 1.Draft Resolution 2.Applicant Submittal City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 9 of 10 powered by Legistar™384 Staff Report REPORT 20-0480 3.Site Photos 4.ESA 2019 Report 5.1999 Architectural Resource Survey Respectfully Submitted by:Yuritzy Randle, Assistant Planner Concur:Ken Robertson,Community Development Director Noted for Fiscal Impact:Charlotte Newkirk, Accounting Manager Legal Review:Lauren Langer, Assistant City Attorney Approved:Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 10 of 10 powered by Legistar™385 RESOLUTION NO. 20-XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS TO ALLOW A MURAL DISPLAY MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 3,376 SQUARE FEET ON THE WEST FACING BUILDING WALL OF THE HISTORIC BIJOU BUILDING LOCATED AT 1221 HERMOSA AVENUE AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15301 AND 15061(B)(3) UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) WHEREAS, built in 1923, the Bijou Building was designated as a historical landmark, pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 17.53.070, by the City Council in 1999. This designation was based on the distinctive architectural style (Neoclassical Revival) and the building exemplified the early social and economic history of Hermosa Beach; and, WHEREAS, on July 1, 2020, an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness was filed by Steve Izant for Hermosa Mural Project (hereinafter “Applicant”), requesting to allow a apply mural display measuring approximately 3,376 square feet on the west facing building wall of the Bijou Theater Building using a combination of painting directly on the existing wall, and applying a painted fabric to the existing wall, which depicts an image and tribute to the demolished historic Sand & Surf Club a.k.a the Hermosa Biltmore Hotel and, WHEREAS, the City’s Community Development Department, reviewed the proposed mural display for consistency with the Secretary of Interior’s Guidelines; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request on July 28, 2020, at which time testimony and evidence, both oral and written, was presented to and considered by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, 386 Page 2 of 6 CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in this Resolution are true and correct. SECTION 2. The proposed project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Sections 15301 and 15061(b)(3) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the project involves minor exterior alterations to an existing facility. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)(3) generally, a project that follows the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings or the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (1995), (Weeks and Grimmer), shall be considered as mitigated to a level of less than a significant impact on the historical resource. The building is a designated historic resource and while a temporary alteration to the exterior, this action is found to be categorically exempt from CEQA as defined in Sections 15301 and 15061(b)(3), Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation, because the mural project involves minor and temporary exterior alterations to an existing facility, in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitation, Restoring and Reconstruction Historic Buildings. There is no evidence in the record that the temporary mural on the west façade will impact the character defining features of the resource. SECTION 3. Pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 17.53.160(A), the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby finds, determines, and declares: A. The proposed work will: 1) conforms to the prescriptive standards adopted by the Council;2) will not detrimentally alter, destroy or adversely affect any exterior improvement or exterior architectural feature; and 3) will retain the essential elements that make the resource significant. The City’s Community Development Department completed a review of the proposed plans. The proposed project would retain and preserve the historic character of the Neoclassical style Bijou Building and will not result in the removal, destruction, or alteration of any character-defining features that contribute 387 Page 3 of 6 to the subject property’s significance as a historical resource. As set out in the July 28, 2020 report to the City Council, all work conforms to the Secretary of Interior’s standards for historical resource restoration. The analysis used a previous report conducted by Environmental Science Association (ESA) for the City of Hermosa Beach for a Certificate of Appropriateness Review for a proposed tenant improvements (Project) at 1221 Hermosa Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California (“1221 Hermosa Avenue” or “Project Site”) by Gensler for Beach City Capital (Tenant), dated September 12, 2019 and the 1999 Architectural Resources Survey Report of the Bijou Theater Building prepared by PCR Services Corporation for the City of Hermosa Beach, to evaluate the federal, state and local historical significance of the Bijou Theater Building based upon criteria used by the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, the City of Hermosa Beach Historic Resource Preservation Ordinance, and survey methodology of the State Office of Historic Preservation ( OHP), to analyze the project’s compliance with the Secretary of Interior’s standards for historical resource restoration. Nevertheless, conditions of approval need to be incorporated to ensure the project will not result in potential adverse impacts by causing unintended damage to character- defining features during application and removal of the mural display. These conditions of approval are included as part of this action. SECTION 4. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby approves the requested Certificate of Appropriateness for modifications at 1221 Hermosa Avenue, subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The project shall be substantially consistent with the application materials submitted and approved by City Council on July 28, 2020. The Community Development Director shall review and may approved minor modifications that do not otherwise conflict with the Municipal Code or requirements of this approval. Any substantial deviation from the submitted application materials shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council. 2. The applicant shall not be permitted to affix scaffolding to the building wall for the application of the mural project. The applicant shall utilize a freestanding scaffold for the application of the project. 388 Page 4 of 6 3. Should the mural display be removed, the applicant shall restore the stucco on the west facing building wall to its pre-existing condition, prior to the application of the mural display. 4. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC), obtain all required building, encroachment, sign and other required permits, and comply with all requirements of the Building, Public Works and Fire Departments. Project construction shall conform to the Noise Control Ordinance requirements in HBMC Section 8.24.050. 5. Pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 17.53.200, Duty to keep in good repair, the owner, occupant or other person in actual charge of a landmark building structure or improvement shall keep in good repair the exterior portions of all such buildings, structures, or improvements, and all interior portions thereof whose maintenance is necessary to prevent deterioration and decay of any exterior improvement or architectural features. 6. Approval of this Certificate of Appropriateness shall lapse and become void eighteen (18) months from the date of final approval, unless a building permit (if required) has been issued and the work authorized by the Certificate has commenced prior to such expiration date and is diligently pursued to completion. Upon request of the property owner, including the reason therefore, at least 60 days prior to the expiration date, the Certificate of Appropriateness may be extended by the City Council for an additional period of up to twelve (12) months. The City Council may approve, approve with conditions or deny any request for extension. Section 5. This permit shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this permit. 389 Page 5 of 6 The Precise Development Plan shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. To the extent permitted by law, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Hermosa Beach, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the “indemnified parties”) from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void any permit or approval for this project authorized by the City, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorney’s fees and costs in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this permit. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. SECTION 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the original of the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City Council; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the minutes of the City Council meeting at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall transmit a copy of this Resolution to the Applicant. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 2020. ____________________________________________________________________________ PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California 390 Page 6 of 6 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ _____________________________ City Clerk City Attorney 391 Hermosa Beach Murals Project Application for review and approval by the City of Hermosa Beach for Mural #10 A Celebration of the Historic Surf And Sand Club a.k.a. The Hermosa Biltmore Hotel June, 2020 392 Proposed Location And Size of the Mural Hermosa Beach Murals Project (HBMP) proposes to place our 10th mural celebrating the historic Sand & Surf Club, a.k.a. The Hermosa Biltmore Hotel on the West Wall of the Historic Metropolitan / Bijou Theatre. The mural would cover 100% of the West wall. Style of Painting To be painted by nationally renowned artist John Pugh, the mural will be painted in the Trompe l o’eil style, “a genre of still life painting that exploits human vision to create the illusion that the subject of the painting is real." John Pugh, in the Trompe L’ oeil style, painted HBMP’s third mural celebrating Hermosa’s famous Light House Café. The mural is located on the North side of the building located at 1001 Hermosa Avenue. Method of Application The mural will be applied using a combination of painting directly on the existing wall and painted fabric applied to the existing wall. A protective sealer will then be applied to the entire mural. 393 For the application of the mural inside of the area to be covered by the fabric, first a thin base will be applied to the area. The thing base coat will then have a very thin net applied to prevent future cracking. Over the net will be applied the skim coat itself. Painted fabric then will be applied to the skim coat surface. The fabric needs to be applied to a smooth surface and cannot be applied to the existing stucco without severely compromising the integrity of the fabric surface and appearance. Discussion Of The Existing Wall / Stucco Existing record of permits issued by the City of Hermosa Beach for this building show that in 1995 and 1999, permits were issued for the seismic retrofit of URM (Un Reinforced Masonry). In 2000, a permit was issued for “remodel refurbish exterior.” At this time, stucco / paint was sprayed on the surface using a method called “Text Coat.” In 2019 – An encroachment permit for “rolling scaffolding for use in exterior painting” was issued and the exterior was spray painted again. 394 Scaffolding It will take approximately five weeks starting in the last week in October to install the mural. A freestanding scaffold will be used for the application of the mural and “out-riggers” will be used to stabilize the scaffolding. It is anticipate that eight parking spaces of parking lot will be occupied during the duration of the project. Using a high-lift bucket is not an option because the fabric portion of the mural must be applied horizontally across the surface. Lighting HBMP proposes to add lights to the existing lampposts in Parking Lot B that will illuminate the mural at night. Restoration Of The Wall HBMP has a ten-year agreement with the owner of the building to display the mural. After ten years, HBMP cannot legally prevent the owner or the city from covering over the mural. Should the building owner or city want to cover the mural, it is not HMP’s responsibility to restore the wall to its current condition. After the agreement with the building owner expires, should HMP want to cover over the mural, the area will be restored to the color and texture that exists today using the same Tex Coat method that was used in 2000. 395 Attachment: Site Photos Southeast View of the Bijou Theater Building South Building Elevation 396 North Building Elevation West Building Elevation 397 233 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 150 Santa Monica, CA 90401 310.451.4488 phone 310.451.5279 fax www.esassoc.com September 12, 2019 David Blumenthal, AICP Senior Planner, Community Development Department City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness Review, Suite 101 in Bijou Building, 1221 Hermosa Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California Dear Mr. Blumenthal, Environmental Science Associates (ESA) appreciates the opportunity to submit this letter report (Report) to the Community Development Department, City of Hermosa Beach (City), which summarizes and documents the results of a Certificate of Appropriateness Review for the proposed tenant improvements (Project) at 1221 Hermosa Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California (“1221 Hermosa Avenue” or “Project Site”) by Gensler for Beach City Capital (Tenant). The Neoclassical Revival-style Bijou Building, designed by architect Richard Douglas King and constructed in 1923, is a designated City of Hermosa Beach landmark (Landmark). The Project would adaptively reuse the interior of the theater (Theater Space) at the rear (west side) of the locally designated Bijou Building (“Bijou Building” or “subject property”), which is located at 1221-1237 Hermosa Avenue at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and 13th Street on assessor parcel number (APN) 4183-002-008 (Project Site), as continued office space. Because the Bijou Building is considered a historical resource and the proposed tenant improvements may result in potential adverse impacts, the Tenant must obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness review of the Project for conformance to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation (Standards). This Report includes a Project description, summary of previous evaluations of the Project Site, character- defining features analysis, and review of Project plans to ensure compliance with the Standards. This Report was prepared by ESA’s architectural historians, including Margarita C. Jerabek, Ph.D., Director of Historic Resources, Alison Garcia Kellar, M.S., Senior Architectural Historian, who meet and exceed the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards in history and architectural history. Professional qualifications are provided in Attachment A. Previous Evaluations of the Bijou Building The Bijou Building was designed by architect Richard Douglas King in the Neoclassical Revival style and constructed in 1923. In 1998, PCR Services Corporation (PCR), now ESA, evaluated the Bijou Building, finding it eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) under criteria A and C and as a Landmark under local criteria A, C, and D.1 The report found the Bijou Building to exemplify the early social 1 Jan Ostashey, PCR Services, Department of Parks and Recreation Form: Bijou Theater Building, December 22, 1998. The National Register criteria are: (A) It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; (B) 398 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 2 and economic history of Hermosa Beach and be a distinctive example of the Neoclassical Revival architectural style and representative example of notable Southern California architect Richard Douglas King’s work. The Bijou Building’s period of significance was identified as 1923, its original date of construction. The Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) form recording the 1998 survey findings is included in Attachment B. On April 27, 1999, the City adopted Resolution Nos. 99-5980 and 99-5981 designating the Bijou Building as a historic landmark pursuant to Section 15.53.070 of the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance and approving the use of the Standards to guide future change to the Project Site. Recent modifications to the building occurred in 2017, including conservation and restoration of the decorative plaster elements at the proscenium arch, flanking tri-partite loggias, surrounding cornice molding, and Corinthian columns with helical shafts. A historic photograph of the interior of the original auditorium of the Bijou Building (now part of the Theater Space) is provided in Figures 1 and 2 below. For comparison purposes, current photographs of the interior of the Theater Space are provided in Figures 2 through 8 below. It is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; (C) It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; (D) It yields, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. The City of Hermosa Beach Historic Preservation Ordinance defines a landmark as: (A) A resource exemplifying special cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history; (B) A resource identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history; (C) A resource embodying distinctive characteristics of style, type, period, or method of construction or a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; (D) A resource representative of notable work of a builder, designer, or architect; (E) A resource with unique location, singular physical characteristics, representing an established and familiar visual feature or landmark of a neighborhood, community or the City. 399 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 3 1221 Hermosa Avenue / D190790.00 SOURCE: Hermosa Beach Historical Society Figure 1 Original auditorium of Bijou Building, view southwest, early twentieth-century 1221 Hermosa Avenue / D190790.00 SOURCE: ESA, 2019 Figure 2 Theater Space, view southwest, 2019 400 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 4 1221 Hermosa Avenue / D190790.00 SOURCE: ESA, 2019 Figure 3 Theater Space, view northwest, 2019 1221 Hermosa Avenue / D190790.00 SOURCE: ESA, 2019 Figure 4 (Left) Theater Space, view north, 2019 Figure 5 (Right) Theater Space, view north, 2019 401 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 5 1221 Hermosa Avenue / D190790.00 SOURCE: ESA, 2019 Figure 6 (Left) Theater Space, view southeast, 2019 Figure 7 (Right) Theater Space, view southeast, 2019 1221 Hermosa Avenue / D190790.00 SOURCE: ESA, 2019 Figure 8 Theater Space, view northwest, 2019 402 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 6 Interior Alteration History of the Theater Space at 1221 Hermosa Avenue The interior of the Theater Space has undergone substantial alteration since 1983, when the original auditorium was converted into a movie theater; at that time, the auditorium was divided into two spaces, and the subject property was renamed the Bijou Twin Cinema.2 In 1997, the CIM Group, a real estate development company, purchased the vacant Bijou Building and adaptively reused the interior of the auditorium as retail and office space. The DPR form recording the 1998 survey findings includes a description of the plaster ornamentation in the interior of Theater Space as follows: The…interior is styled after the classical orders of architecture and contain plaster molded swags, flowers, dancing fairies, and the theatrical masks “Tragedy and Comedy” illustrating the spirit of entertainment. A wide decorative frieze, depicting the muses of vaudeville – Song, Dance, Music, and Drama, runs along the north…and east walls, as well as small portions of the west wall.3 Since the time of the 1998 survey, the interior of the Theater Space has been altered further. In 2000, the Bijou Building was structurally retrofitted, with the installation of plywood panels along the ceiling of the Theater Space, as well as steel bracing. In 2003, the interior of the Theater Space was remodeled as a fine art gallery and artist space.4 Finally, in the early 2010s, the interior of the Theater Space was adaptively reused as an architectural office. Presently, as detailed in the interior character-defining features analysis below, the Theater Space retains original plaster ornamentation around the proscenium (west side) and on the side (north and south) walls; however, the plasterwork has been painted white. The remainder of the Theater Space has been extensively altered. The current rear (east) wall of the Theater Space is not original and has subdivided the original house area. Original seating and related sloped flooring have been removed. It is possible that the original stage below the proscenium arch has been removed, or that it still partially or fully remains below contemporary flooring and sub-flooring. Moreover, the original stage area presently includes partitions for four office spaces; partition walls have also been added along the non-original rear wall, immediately to the south of the original proscenium, to create a kitchen and storage area. The storefront window and door assemblies along the north wall at 13th Street and the rolled carpeting are not original. 2 “Cove Theater Trying Again, as Art House,” Los Angeles Times, October 6, 1983, p. SB_A1. 3 Ostashey, Bijou Theater Building. 4 “You have to C it,” Daily Breeze, March 11, 2003. 403 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 7 It should be noted that in May 2017, Spectra Company completed conservation of all original decorative plasterwork in the interior of the Theater Space, which will be retained under the Project. The scope of work carried out by Spectra Company included the restoration of damaged plasterwork and replication of missing decorative features, such as a medallion at the apex of the proscenium and balusters below the two loggias flanking the proscenium. ESA inspected all conservation work carried out by Spectra Company, finding it to conform with the Standards. ESA previously reviewed proposed project plans for the building which were not executed. Interior Character-Defining Features Analysis The Project would continue to adaptively reuse the interior of the Theater Space at the rear of the locally designated Bijou Building as office space. Therefore, it is important to identify the character-defining features that should be retained in order to ensure Project conformance with the intent of the Standards in support of a Certificate of Appropriateness and a finding of a less than significant impact pursuant to CEQA. A project that retains a significant combination of character-defining features associated with the Bijou Building and is designed to confirm to the Standards would result in a less than significant impact to the historical resource pursuant to CEQA impact thresholds. Under the Standards, minimal change is allowed to support a compatible change in use. Under the Standards and CEQA, minimal changes and adverse impacts are allowed, respectively, as long as the eligibility of a property is preserved and appropriate mitigation measures are included to reduce potential adverse impacts that may be caused by removal of non-contributing additions or alterations necessary to rehabilitate the building for its new use. According to the National Park Service’s Preservation Brief 17, Architectural Character: Identifying the Visual Aspects of Historic Buildings as an Aid to Their Preservation, “character refers to all those visual aspects and physical features that comprise the appearance of every historic building. Character-defining elements include the overall shape of the building, its materials, craftsmanship, decorative details, interior spaces and features, as well as the various aspects of its site and environment. The purpose [is to] identify those features or elements that give the building its visual character and that should be taken into account in order to preserve them to the maximum extent possible.”5 Below is an inventory of character-defining features, classified as primary, contributing, and non-contributing, that are associated with the Theater Space at the rear of the Bijou Building. Primary character-defining features are by definition the most important and should be considered for retention in order to preserve and protect the eligibility of the Bijou Building as a historical resource. Alteration or removal of these features should be 5 Lee A. Nelson, Preservation Brief 17: Architectural Character- Identifying the Visual Aspects of Historic Buildings as an Aid to Preserving their Character, National Park Service, Department of the Interior. http://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/17- architectural-character.htm, accessed 8/1/2019. 404 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 8 avoided. Contributing character-defining features add to the character of a historic property and should be retained to the greatest extent feasible and rehabilitated as appropriate; however, more flexibility is given to these features as alterations to some contributing features may not adversely impact the Bijou Building’s eligibility as a historical resource. The greatest flexibility is afforded to non-contributing features; their complete removal does not usually adversely impact the significance of the Bijou Building. Non-contributing features were not identified; if a feature is not listed below as significant or contributing, it can be assumed that the elevation or feature is non-contributing. However, non-contributing alterations to significant or contributing character- defining features are noted in italics (italics). Period of Significance: The period of significance identified for the Bijou Building is 1923, its original date of construction. Primary: Proscenium and Stage Area of Theater Space • Rectangular stage area with north wall constructed of brick masonry laid in common bond (partition walls non-contributing) • Arched proscenium supported by two piers and flanked by two curved walls, each punctured by a tri-partite loggia (finish of northern, or inside, face of north curved wall non-contributing); loggias consist of three rounded arches (central arch wider than two flanking arches) • All decorative plasterwork associated with proscenium (painted finish non-contributing): moldings above proscenium; vegetal motifs in bas-relief along proscenium; scrolls supporting proscenium; pedestal adorned with bas-relief above each pier, including a stylized face, supporting a griffin; recessed niche on east face of each pier, with scalloped hood and stylized pedestal, flanked by engaged Corinthian columns with helical shafts; pilaster with Corinthian capital on inside-facing side of each pier; decorative frieze with bas-relief along curved walls flanking proscenium; each loggia surmounted by ornate frieze, supported by slender fluted Corinthian columns, and fitted with a faux-balustrade; slender Corinthian column with helical shaft at both ends of curved walls flanking proscenium • Rough plaster finish directly above curved walls flanking proscenium (rectangular vent openings and vents non-contributing; painted finish non-contributing) Primary: North and West Interior Walls of Theater Space • Rectangular doorway on north side of proscenium with heavy geometric surrounds; decorative frieze with bas-relief above doorway; pair of slender Corinthian columns with helical shafts to the north of doorway, abutting north wall 405 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 9 • North (side) interior wall along 13th Street (fenestration non-contributing); western portion of north wall constructed of brick masonry; eastern portion of north wall comprises entrance area and is adorned with decorative plasterwork (painted finish non-contributing), including frieze with bas-relief above window openings; engaged Corinthian columns with helical shafts • West (front) interior wall constructed of brick masonry CEQA Impacts Analysis Significance Thresholds The thresholds for determining the significance of environmental effects on historical resources identified below are derived from the CEQA Guidelines as defined in §15064.5. Pursuant to this guidance, a project that would physically detract, either directly or indirectly, from the integrity and significance of the historical resource such that its eligibility for listing in the National Register, California Register or as a City of Hermosa Beach Landmark would no longer be maintained, is considered a project that would result in a significant impact on the historical resource. Adverse impacts, that may or may not rise to a level of significance, result when one or more of the following occurs to a historical resource: demolition, relocation, conversion, rehabilitation, or alteration, or new construction on the site or in the vicinity. CEQA Guidelines According to the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5(b) a project involves a “substantial adverse change” in the significance of the resource when one or more of the following occurs: • Substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource means physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired. • The significance of a historical resource is materially impaired when a project: A. Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for inclusion in, the California Register of Historical Resources; or B. Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources pursuant to Section 5020.1(k) of the PRC or its identification in a historical resources survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the PRC, 406 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 10 unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or C. Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources as determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards (Standards) As mentioned above, under CEQA, a project that follows the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing, Historic Buildings or the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (1995), Weeks and Grimmer, (Standards) shall be considered as mitigated to a level of less than a significant impact on the Historical Resource.6 The Standards were developed by the U.S. Department of the Interior as a means to evaluate and approve work on historic buildings for federal grants and rehabilitation tax credits. The Standards are codified at 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 67.7. CEQA recognizes the value of the Standards by using them to demonstrate that a project that generally follows the Standards shall be considered as mitigated to a level of less than a significant impact and may be approved without an EIR.7 In effect, CEQA has a “safe harbor” by providing either a categorical exemption or a negative declaration for a project which meets the Standards. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15331 and 15064.5(b)(3). However, failure to strictly comply with the Standards may not result in significant impacts to a historical resource if the project does not result in material impairment that would detract from its eligibility. Analysis of Project Impacts Project Description This analysis is required by the City as part of the Certificate of Appropriate Review process for a Project that would continue to reuse the Theater Space at the rear (west side) of the Bijou Building as office space for the Tenant. The Project would retain all of the extant character-defining features in the Theater Space that contribute to the overall significance of the Bijou Building as a historical resource and would not alter or be physically connected to them. Current Project plans, prepared by Gensler and issued on May 15, 2019, and an updated notes set issued on September 10, 2019 are included in Attachment C. Exterior modifications along the north, 13th Street elevation of the Bijou Building would include the removal of the non-original double door with a transom and window assembly, and the removal of two additional non- 6 California Environmental Quality Act, 15064.5 (3). 7 Ibid. 407 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 11 original window assemblies. The current main entrance door within the storefront at the westernmost extent of this north-facing elevation along 13th Street will be replaced. The door and replacement will be detailed and fabricated to match the existing mullions. Sensitive demolition and installation will be undertaken at the existing original brick when replacing doors and windows, noting the previous modifications in these areas. This will serve as the main entrance to the tenant space. The Project would demolish previous, non-contributing tenant improvements in the Theater Space, including all existing interior glass partition walls and supports, lighting systems, break room built-in cabinetry and counter millwork, and flooring. The Project would then install new gypsum partition walls in the stage area to accommodate a conference room and a private office. The southern-most extant non-original partition wall will be modified into a slab to deck wall. These wall partitions would extend from the west brick wall to the edge of the former stage, just behind the proscenium arch. The walls will be self-supported and anchored at the base with internal lateral bracing. The Project will involve the construction of new offices along the eastern extent of the space, which would will replace the current non-original break room area. Six proposed office spaces, running along the majority of the eastern elevation would face out onto the open work space, constructed with gypsum partition walls with clear tempered framed full-height glass partition system with horizontal muntins. An open work space area will sit in between the newly configured offices spaces along the east and west extents of the space. Here, the flooring will include inlaid rolled carpet toward the center which will be surrounded by hardwood flooring. Applicant will determine if portions of the historic wood stage remain below the existing carpet upon demolition (removal of carpet and demolition of offices), and will ensure adequate protections in place if portions of the stage are uncovered. New custom millwork will be freestanding and set along the curved portion of northern curved wall housing a tripartite loggia. This millwork will not be attached to the wall, nor will it damage existing historical features along the wall. The current non-original light fixtures, both suspended and pendant, will be removed. A new drop lighting system will be installed to replace the existing. In the southeastern corner of the Theatre Space and accessible through a narrow hallway, a non-original wall comprising the men’s restroom will be reconfigured to accommodate ADA regulations. This wall attaches to a historic wall along the south interior elevation that still features original textured plasterwork. Re-configurations of non-original walls in this space will be demolished, and attached to the textured plaster wall sensitively. Where necessary, new repairs to the original wall will match the original finish and texture. The tenant improvements were created in a contemporary style with modern materials that include steel, glass, and gypsum that are compatible with but differentiated from the Bijou Building’s Neoclassical style and original materials. The project would also replace the existing non-contributing carpeting and replace non-original light fixtures throughout. 408 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 12 Impacts Analysis The Project would continue to adaptively reuse the interior of the Theater Space at Suite 101 of the locally designated Bijou Building as office space in conformance with the Standards. The Project would not materially impair the Bijou Building or any of the character-defining features that contribute to its significance as a historical resource, including the stage area, proscenium, decorative plasterwork, and north and west interior walls. The Project as proposed would not materially impair the locally designated Bijou Building and would retain all of the character-defining features that contribute to its significance as a historical resource. However, implementation of the Project may result in potential adverse impacts by causing unintended damage to character- defining features, including original and restored plasterwork, during demolition and construction. To protect the historical and architectural significance and integrity of the Bijou Building, ESA recommends that the City require a qualified architectural historian or historic preservation consultant to conduct construction monitoring at regular intervals during demolition and construction to ensure that character-defining features will be protected and preserved during construction. Upon Project completion, a qualified architectural historian or historic preservation consultant shall prepare a Substantial Completion Report for submittal to the City which includes a summary of observations made during construction monitoring and a final review of the Project for compliance with the Standards, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. This mitigation measure (or project condition) would help to ensure that the Bijou Building retains its eligibility as a locally designated historical resource, and that any potential adverse impacts resulting from the Project would be reduced to a less than significant level upon Project completion. Therefore, because the Project conforms to the Standards and the Bijou Building would remain a Landmark following Project completion with mitigation, there are no direct impacts to historical resources on the Project Site pursuant to CEQA. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards Review Standard 1: A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. The Project requires the adaptive reuse of the interior of the Theater Space at the rear of the Bijou Building as office space. It should be noted that the interior of the Theater Space has already been converted to office space and undergone substantial alteration in the process, as explained in detail above. As such, the Project would require minimal change to the existing materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize the Bijou Building. Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 1. Standard 2: The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. 409 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 13 The Project would retain and preserve the historic character of the Theater Space of the Neoclassical- style Bijou Building and not result in the removal, destruction, or alteration of any character-defining features that contribute to the subject property’s significance as a historical resource. The features that are to be removed as part of this work include non-original wall partitions, built-in cabinetry, and non- original windows and door assemblies. Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 2. Standard 3: Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. The Project recognizes the distinctive historic and architectural character of the Bijou Building and does not include changes that create a false sense of historical development or conjectural features from other historic properties. Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 3. Standard 4: Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. The Theater Space at the rear of the Bijou Building does not appear to include any alterations or additions that have acquired significance due to their association with significant events or the productive lives of historic personages or through architectural merit. Modifications to remove and or enclose the former house theatre seating took place in the 1990s and to add additional full height and partial height walls do not appear to have acquired historic significance in their own right. Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 4. Standard 5: Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. The Project would retain the distinctive materials, features, finishes, construction techniques and examples of craftsmanship that characterize the Bijou Building, including the stage area, proscenium, decorative plasterwork, and west interior brick wall. Furthermore, as noted above, in May 2017, Spectra Company completed conservation of all original decorative plasterwork in the interior of the Theater Space, which will be retained under the project. The scope of work carried out by Spectra Company included the restoration of damaged plasterwork and replication of missing decorative features, such as a medallion at the apex of the proscenium and balusters below the two loggias flanking the proscenium. Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 5. 410 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 14 Standard 6: Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. The scope of the proposed Project does not include the repair of any deteriorated historic features associated with the Bijou Building. The of character-defining features in the Theater Space have been restored by the Spectra Company, a qualified historic contractor, and remain in excellent condition. Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 6. Standard 7: Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. Standard 7 is not applicable to the Project, as it would not involve any chemical treatments. Standard 8: Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. Standard 8 is not applicable to the Project, as its scope only includes interior tenant improvements, and modifications of the northern wall. Standard 9: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale, and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. The Project as proposed would retain all of the character-defining features that contribute to the Bijou Building’s significance as a historical resource. However, as mentioned above, implementation of the Project may cause unintended damage to character-defining features, including original and restored plasterwork, during demolition and construction. To protect the historical and architectural significance and integrity of the Bijou Building, ESA recommends that the City require construction monitoring. This mitigation measure would help to ensure that the Bijou Building retains its eligibility as a locally designated historical resource. All new work carried out under the Project would be differentiated from the old and would be compatible with the historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the Bijou Building. As such, the integrity of the Bijou Building as a locally designated property would be protected. The Project would feature a contemporary design and modern materials, including steel, glass, and gypsum that are compatible with but differentiated from the Bijou Building’s Neoclassical style and original materials, 411 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 15 including plasterwork. For example, the east elevation of the proposed conference room and private office would be faced with glass. Moreover, all new partition walls installed in the original stage area would be confined behind the proscenium and would be lower than it in height. In this way, the original design intent of the proscenium would be preserved. Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 9. Standard 10: New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. The Project would not result in the construction of any additions to the Bijou Building. Moreover, all related new construction would be reversible, including new interior partition walls. If removed in the future, the Bijou Building’s integrity as a locally designated property would remain unimpaired. Therefore, the Project would conform to Standard 10. Conclusion and Recommendations In 1998, PCR, now ESA, evaluated the Bijou Building, finding it eligible for listing in the National Register and as a City historic landmark. In 1999, the City adopted Resolution Nos. 99-5980 and 99-5981 designating the Bijou Building as a Landmark and approving the use of the Standards to guide future change to the Project Site. Accordingly, this Report is required by the City as part of the Certificate of Appropriate Review process for a Project that would adaptively reuse the Theater Space, Suite 101, at the rear (west) of the Bijou Building as office space for the Tenant. ESA reviewed Project plans prepared by Gensler issued on May 15, 2019, to determine if the Project would result in potential direct impacts to historical resources on the Project Site. The Project as proposed would not materially impair the locally designated Bijou Building and would retain all of the character-defining features that contribute to its significance as a historical resource. However, implementation of the Project may result in potential adverse impacts by causing unintended damage to character- defining features, including original and restored plasterwork, during demolition and construction. To protect the historical and architectural significance and integrity of the Bijou Building, ESA recommends that the City require a qualified architectural historian or historic preservation consultant to create a preservation plan, and to conduct construction monitoring at regular intervals during demolition and construction. Upon Project completion, a qualified architectural historian or historic preservation consultant shall prepare a Substantial Completion Report for submittal to the City which includes a summary of observations made during construction monitoring and a final review of the Project for compliance with the Standards. This mitigation measure would help to ensure that the Bijou Building retains its eligibility as a locally designated historical resource, and that any potential adverse impacts resulting from the Project would be reduced to a less than significant level upon Project completion. 412 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 16 Therefore, with mitigation, the Project would have no impact under CEQA because the integrity of the Bijou Building as a Landmark would not be compromised. Furthermore, the Project would be in full compliance with Standards 1 through 10. The Project would also be Categorically Exempt under Class 31, Section 15331, Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation of CEQA because it would conform to the Standards and not materially impair the locally designated Bijou Building and would retain all of the character-defining features that contribute to its significance as a historical resource. However, demolition activities and unforeseen circumstances that may arise during construction have the potential to damage character-defining features of the subject property and would require construction monitoring by a qualified preservation consultant to ensure the project would be completed in conformance with the Standards. In order to minimize these potential construction impacts to the historical resource, the following Mitigation Measure is recommended to ensure that potential adverse impacts shall be reduced to less than significant: • Construction Monitoring The retained architectural historian shall conduct construction monitoring at key points—including during both demolition and construction—to ensure that damage to any historic fabric or features that are to be retained is avoided or minimized. A qualified architectural historian or historic architect who satisfies the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards pursuant to 36 CFR 61, shall conduct the monitoring and provide preservation treatment consultation to address any unanticipated issues that may arise and to ensure that the Project meets the Standards. The construction monitoring process shall be documented in daily logs and a substantial completion monitoring report letter. The construction monitoring site visits shall be fully recorded in photographs and written manuscript notes that shall be documented in a memorandum. At the completion of construction, a final substantial completion letter report shall be prepared and placed in the property file at the Planning Division. 413 David Blumenthal, AICP City of Hermosa Beach September 12, 2019 Page 17 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at MJerabek@esassoc.com or (310) 451-4488. Sincerely, Margarita Jerabek, Ph.D. Historic Resources Director Attachments Attachment A – Resumes Attachment B – 1998 Survey Finding Attachment C – Project Plans 414 I I Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building 1 1 1 Prepared for City of Hermosa Beach I I 1 1 Prepared by PCR Services Corporation I 1 1 January 1999 1 1 415 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 1 U B. METHODOLOGY 1 II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 6 A. HISTORIC CONTEXT 6 B. ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION 16 III. ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC RESOURCES 22 A. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION 22 IV. HISTORIC RESOURCES SIGNIFICANCE 29 A. NATIONAL REGISTER 29 B. CALIFORNIA REGISTER 31 C. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 31 D. CHARACTER-DEFINING FEATURES 32 BIBLIOGRAPHY 36 APPENDIX 40 State of California Historic Inventory Form (DPR523) 41 1 1 Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999Pagei 1 416 LIST OF FIGURES 1 1 Figure Page 1 Regional Location Map 2 2 Project Vicinity Map 3 3 Historic Photographs 8 1 4 Hermosa Theatre c. 1940 11 5 Historic Photographs 13 6 Current Photographs 21 7 Character-Defining Features 33 8 Character-Defining Features 34 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999Pageii 1 417 I. INTRODUCTION A. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This Historic Architectural Survey Report documents and evaluates the federal, state, and local significance and eligibility of the Bijou Theatre Building. The Bijou Theatre Building is located at 1227-1235 Hermosa Avenue, Hermosa Beach, Los Angeles County, California (see Figure 1). It is situated on the west side of Hermosa Avenue between Thirteenth Court and Thirteenth Street, north of Pier Avenue (see Figure 2). The building lies in the City's revitalized downtown commercial center. Building upon prior research, this report includes fieldwork, additional research and evaluation of the Bijou Theatre Building (Bijou)by PCR Services Corporation(PCR). The Bijou has been inventoried and evaluated per federal, state, and local criteria. Upon completion of this formal evaluation, the property appears to be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), the California Register of Historical Places (California Register), and the Hermosa Beach Register of Historic Resources. It is significant for its Larchitectural value and because it is the City of Hermosa Beach's sole surviving property type that is most closely associated with early entertainment and the early economic growth of the City. I B. METHODOLOGY The consultant performed a records search and review of the National Register of Historic Places and its annual updates, the 1995 California Historic Resources Inventory maintained by the State Office of Historic Preservation, and the City of Hermosa Beach Historic Preservation Ordinance, to determine existing evaluations and designations of the Bijou Theatre Building. An historical resources records search was also conducted by the South Central Coastal Information Center at the University of California, Los Angeles. The results of this search indicate that this property is not currently listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, and is not designated a California Historical Landmark or California Point of Historical Interest. I Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999 Page 1 418 1 1 Mojave —_.__ I 5 Frazier Park Ii I Castaic Antelope Valley I VENTURA \ L o Lancaster oCastaic L 0 S e G lbiLES Ii COUNTY Palmdale COUNT I 1 Ojai 5• 14 150 Fillmore Valencia O 11 zo Lake Santa 126 O Sa rita Casitas 33 Paula 23 405 O Moorpark Thou w nd Simi Valley \ San Gabriel A,1110Ventura O 118 r_ 210 i/nta/qs Chatsworth2 I nard •• tri t O s Van : urbanki' 0 Woodland,I Hillsci 405 Nuy OII AtPortOEncino1 61.4HuenemeAgouraHills 1 Hollyw. . 210 anta Monica<Mtns. : everlills,,° asadena t R J Malibu 4111Oe11 Anacapa Is. Santa Moni Lo-Ange el 60 1 Pacific p 90 C e 605 710 0 Whitti Manh-. los Mrilim i-- I vo,' Or 1 Hermosa Beat , s, rltllrir Redondo• BEACH \ "`.4. "i PROJECT SITE Beach 0Torran- xix1ly. 1. 4174,14nWAIIi ': San 1 " Pedro•hong \' 72;:..144-1,-;i1 x ,ftun 0. Beach 4051:0 imill-- 0Al1IIEAOSiR , 1 Pt " ,',\ ^ Huntington t...." 1:u j tsa'Vii"`; Beach i t 07: 71° I PallAlifiWo Oa : -.0 5tH t. Santa Cataltna Is.1 I Ili 1111,1111:11,11111 o N 20 Figure 1onMapRegionalLocati Miles I Source:PCR and Thomas Bros.1998 419 I I 1 L..„. .-......, I hi ,-••-- •----- , ; I L.. ..... ' : I 14th Street MIIIMIII ." 111111 q i 1._ ts rim iimul I tic i low I 1 11 Et ar I PROJECT SITE I6 IIr 13th Street if A 4 4 I 1 1111 i iy.!.:::. i.:.:.:.:.:....::::::.:::::....:::::.: I 13th Court toen ep alli 11 liir4r.E el Hermoi:”Beach 71 1=3 1 15 I ler It I I X Pier Avenue I 1:1- 1111111111111 . 1t0 f. I i 12th Court 7 . I 1 1 1- 4 1 i I ...I I I 4 It_ii u11th Street 2 1 I i F1 Bijou Theatre Building I 111114 isiziim 4 Figure 2 Project Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE ISource:City of Hermosa Beach 420 I. Introduction i Several types and degrees of pre- and post-field research were conducted as part of this Istudy, including windshield and intensive level surveys, building permit reviews, and literature research. Additional research included interviewing several individuals knowledgeable in the III history of Hermosa Beach and in the history of vaudeville and motion picture theatre. The following archival, research, and historical repositories were consulted during this study: I Hermosa Beach Public Library - Hermosa Beach, CA; Hermosa Beach Museum and Historical Society - Hermosa Beach, CA; I City of Hermosa Beach Planning Department, Hermosa Beach, CA; I Los Angeles Public Library - Los Angeles, CA; Santa Monica Public Library - Reference Department, Santa Monica, CA; I California State University Northridge - Sanborn Map Library, Northridge, CA; U Library of Congress - Washington, D.C. (via the Internet); National Register of Historic Places - Washington, D.C. (via the Internet). IIn conducting the identification and evaluation of historic resources located within the study area, PCR performed the following tasks: I Searched records of the National Register of Historic Places, California Historical IResources Inventory, and the City of Hermosa Beach Historical Society. Conducted a field inspection of the study area. I Photographed recognized landmarks and potential historic resources located within the study area. Collected and reviewed historic images and archives of the study area including, but not limited to those at the Hermosa Beach Historical Society, and the Los Angeles 1 Public Library. Conducted site specific research on historic resources including the use of City of I Hermosa Beach building permit records, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, and the Los Angeles Central Library collection. I IArchitectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999Page4 I 421 1 I. Introduction Reviewed and analyzed ordinances, statues, regulations, bulletins, and technical materials relating to federal, state, and local historic preservation designation assessment processes, and related programs. Evaluated potential historic resources based upon criteria used by the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, the City of Hermosa Beach Historic Resource Preservation Ordinance, and survey methodology of the State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999 Page 5 r 422 I I II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING I 1 A. HISTORIC CONTEXT 1 1. Early Development of Hermosa Beachl Hermosa Beach was once a part of the ten-mile ocean frontage of the land grant called Rancho Sausal Redondo. The land grant was given in 1822 as a gift from the King of Spain in 1822 to a loyal subject named Antonio Ygnacio Avila. After Avila's death, his heirs sold the I rancho to a wealthy Scot, Sir Robert Burnett, who arrived in southern California just before the Civil War intending to buy land and raise sheep and cattle. In 1855, Burnett sold the land to another Scot, Daniel Freeman. I The 1880s brought about financial upheavals and prolonged drought that killed off many I cattle throughout the southland. At this time, Freeman began selling off portions of the ranch to pay his bills. In subdividing this acreage, Messrs. Burbank and Baker, real estate agents, realized that some day the beaches around Los Angeles would be valuable as land for pleasure resorts and Isummer playgrounds for vacation seekers of that fast growing city. They also realized that these two miles of level beach would be very accessible by electric transportation to and from I Los Angeles. In 1900, a tract of fifteen hundred acres was purchased for $35.00 an acre from A.E. Pomroy, then the owner of the greater part of the old Rancho Sausal Redondo, by Messrs. Burbank and Baker for Moses Sherman and Eli Clark. Sherman and Clark were railroad men and Iland developers. The two men had built an empire of electric railroads and intended to extend one of them down to the booming port of Redondo Beach. Sherman and Clark who were also part I owners of the Hermosa Beach Land and Water Company, built the first electric transportation line, the Los Angeles Pacific Railway, into and through the city in 1904. And since the railroads needed passengers and freight, the men decided to develop their tract and sell off land for homes I and factories. The City of Hermosa Beach was laid out with the developers' railroad running down the middle of the main street, Hermosa Avenue, and ending up at Redondo Pier. Several Iyearslater the Pacific Electric Railroad took it over and built a freight office and passenger station on the northeast corner of Pier and Hermosa Avenues (demo 1914). I II Excerpted from Hermosa Beach Historical Society WebPages 1 Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999 Page 6 I 423 II. Environmental Setting111 Intended at first to be a resort town for summer visitors from Los Angeles, the tiny town grew and by the majority of one vote, incorporated in 1907 as the 19th city in Los Angeles County. The city grew and the oil and industrial boom of the 1920s brought in factories including a silk mill, glass factory, and tile plant (which created Hermosa Tile). The stock market crash of 1929 signaled the end of the industrial period as all of the factories closed and Hermosa Beach felt the burden of the Depression as the rest of the nation did. After the World War II, Hermosa experienced another boom in population since the city was now well connected by an extensive roadway system linking it to the rest of the southland. 2. Metropolitan (Bijou) Theatre Building Constructed in 1923, the Metropolitan Theatre Building, now called the Bijou Theatre Building, was designed by Richard Douglas King, a local resident and architect with an office in Los Angeles. Situated on the southwest corner of 13th Street and Hermosa Avenue, the building was designed as a combination structure containing a bank, theatre, offices and retail (see Figure 3). The auditorium originally called the Metropolitan Theatre (now referred to as the Bijou Cinemas)has served as a vaudeville and/or live theatre and "first run" motion picture house since its construction. It is the second and only extant of the two theatres constructed in town that served the City during the first half of the 20th Century. The first motion picture house called the Hermosa was built in 1913 and was located on the north side of Pier Avenue at present site of Loreto Plaza. The bank space was occupied by the First Bank of Hermosa Beach which was 111 established in 1913 and appears to have been the first banking institution in the City. Even before the theatre building was constructed the Hermosa Beach Review devoted the first page of the January 19, 1923, newspaper edition to the announcement of the coming of a 2,000,000 bank and movie theatre complex at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and 13th Street. The Review stated that the new project would cover five city lots and include banking service, office suites, and the new theatre. According to the same Review article, this construction project represented the largest expenditure of money ever made in the city under one improvement at that time. a. History of Theatre Use In March of 1923, a contract was closed between the directorates of the First Bank of Hermosa Beach and the Venice Investment Company and their association with West Coast Theatres, Inc. agreeing to lease, operate and manage the new theatre. The theatre was considered the most modern facility comparable to those of the big metropolitan theatres elsewhere. On March 16, 1923, the front page of the Hermosa Beach Review described in detail the interior of Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999 Page 7 I 424 I I NI 1.. ttI I . 1. i v 2 1,71„1.1:0 ?I; ructuvr.., i t= s t ''''71. PI I 110 . 14::1-3.....1. i__.''-c.f-- . ' il:' -- 1, 1:^-:1.,. .......,: . w..L.ii:,11. ! r ..1'11. •...!Er k h IMetropolitan Theatre Building looking northwest (c. 1923) I r l - ;- - . . k .‘ •. ,,_ ~: c _ I 1 I I ! -I !Ill . rTyre-r L. 1 I 1,-- rl, 41 :*. i. . 1 iii FIA I r IMetropolitan Theatre Building looking northwest (c. 1924) I II 11 Alli - 4 PC R Figure 3 Historic Photographs I Source:Hermosa Beach Historical Society 425 H. Environmental Setting the auditorium "For convenience, beauty and comfort Hermosa can well feel proud of her new theatre with its beautiful entrance opening underneath a marquee of rare artistic design, a tiled lobby surmounted with Homan detailing, Jazzed plaster wonderfully decorated in varied hues, an inner foyer with handsome furnishings, a promenade arched and filled with expensive hangings, and an auditorium with its wonderful lighting system, its alcoves and costly paintings and greater than all its cozy seats that range from the mammoth divans to the comfortable leather covered opera chairs." The article went on to describe that "over $10,000 would be spent in equipping the rear of the auditorium. Every conceivable kind of setting or scene that will make it possible to handle acts from the Orpheum, Pantages, and/or the Hill Street Theatre in Los Angeles will be acquired and made available. In addition, motors to control the curtains and the stage lighting from the operators booth in the rear of the theatre will be installed. The theatre would also feature approximately 1,200 seats and a$20,000 Robert Morton("Wonder Morton")pipe organ. A month before the theatre opened a "name the theatre" contest was given. In the May 25, 1923,Hermosa Beach Review,the winners were announced. The Metropolitan, suggested by City Council member J.H. Claudius, was the winner of the $10 first prize. For the next month, a carefully orchestrated publicity program faithfully carried some news item regarding the theatre, bank, or the building itself every week. The grand opening set for June 27 was fully touted with promises of terrific vaudeville shows and visiting movie stars. Promotional pieces promised that the Metropolitan would open with a world premiere of Sol Lesser's (president of Prfinple Pictures) great Hollywood production "Circus Days" starring Jackie Coogan. When the theatre opened June 27, 1923, it was the pride of Hermosa Beach. The theatre opened its doors to a crowd that overflowed a block down the street. The stage and lobby were covered with flower tributes sent by businesses of Hermosa Beach, the South Bay, Los Angeles and Hollywood. Five Orpheum acts were offered along with the Lew Lewis Orchestra and the Master Organist Melvin P. Ogden. The master of ceremonies was southern California actor Noodles" Fagan. In addition to the feature, several novelty reels and a pre-release of a corky comedy also played. The extravaganza lasted till two in the morning. John Bowers and Barbara Tennant co-stars from "Circus Days" attended the premiere, however Jackie Coogan did not. The theatre was designed to accommodate silent pictures, vaudeville and touring shows. The large fully equipped stage handled the traveling shows easily. The showplace was designed with the audience sitting in a Classically inspired, yet whimsical feeling auditorium. The original pipe organ was a Robert Morton (better known as a "Wonder Morton") built by the Robert Morton Organ Company of Van Nuys at a cost of$20,000. The two-chamber installation was traditional with ornate organ grilles hidden in the balconettes of the stage wings on each side of 111 the proscenium. The console was on its own, probably to the left of the stage. 1 Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999Page9 1 426 II. Environmental Setting When the Metropolitan was acquired by Fox West Coast, sometime in the early 1930s, it was renamed the Hermosa (see Figure 4). Portions of the interior including the public restrooms and exterior were modified at this time. The theatre continued to operate a split week program: part of the week was devoted to first run movies and part to vaudeville shows and live entertainment. The Hermosa continued to evolve overtime eventually showing only motion pictures and later housing live rock band performances. Again, the theatre changed its name to the Cove and even later to the Bijou Cinema, which it is known as today. With competition from the new "high-tech" multi-plex theatres, and as a result of City requirements to complete seismic 1 retrofitting under the City's seismic strengthening ordinance, the Bijou Theatre could not sustain itself and finally closed its doors in 1996. b. Other Occupants As stated earlier the Metropolitan Theatre Building also originally contained commercial businesses on the first floor, offices on the second floor, and the local Masonic Lodge and Masonic Club on the third floor. One of the original occupants of the first floor was the First Bank of Hermosa Beach. Late in 1912, a group of local businessmen, under the guidance of S.E. Walker and G.S. Thatcher, 1 incorporated themselves into a group that became known as the First Bank of Hermosa Beach. With a capital of$25,000 the financial institution in the City of Hermosa Beach bank opened its doors to the public on January 27, 1913 in the corner rooms of the building which was known as the Walker Building at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and 13th Street. In 1915, feeling a need to expand for the volume of business that was being done at the bank, it increased its capital to $35,000 and purchased the northwest corner of Pier and Hermosa Avenues from the Pacific Electric Railway Company. This building was used by the Railway Company as a passenger waiting station. This building was torn down in 1914 and a two story building was erected. From 1915 to 1922, the banking business of the city was carried on it these rooms. Then in the early part of 1922, the capital increased again, this time to $50,000. At this time, J.E. Walker who at the time had acted as president of the bank resigned his position. R.E. Matteson was elected the new president of the First Bank of Hermosa Beach. Synchronous with this change came the purchase of the Walker block which had housed the bank in its earlier 1 days. An additional two blocks were acquired totaling five blocks owned by the bank. At the time, the First Bank of Hermosa Beach, which is was a state run bank, was the oldest and largest bank in Hermosa Beach. In 1922, the officers and stockholders wanted to create a second bank to help drive the competition of the proposed National Bank of Hermosa Beach and thereupon organized and opened the First National Bank located on the southwest Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation Page to January 1999 427 I t I 1 i Ti ' i i w 1 i V I i _ 0 I 1 i' leI Ila* i i 1 r ill,; t 111C I - 44,444010",t4141 i L. GARY GO GARY COOPER MARGO POLO- , IGRID GURIE zit DAREDEVILgliSILRATHBONE 11114, . a , . Iv, t1fC[' [30f I ii, 04 IOW li csi lorif t ,... , , .I f moo 1J 11 I i1°P111111111116 Figure 4 Hermosa Theatre c. 1940 1 Source:Hermosa Beach Historical Society 428 111II. Environmental Setting corner of Pier and Hermosa Avenues. The investments of these two banks represented well over a quarter of a million dollars in Hermosa Beach with the affiliated resources being close to the million dollar mark. The officers and directorates of these two institutions represent some of the most influential business men in the community. In 1923, the First Bank of Hermosa Beach, the first and largest bank in the city, built a new more modern combination structure on the five lots acquired in 1922 at the corner of Hermosa Avenue and 13`h Street. Opened for business in June 1 1923, the First Bank of Hermosa Beach, housed in the Metropolitan Theatre Building, was considered one of the most modern banking institutions (of its time) in Los Angeles County. Initially occupying the southern space of the Metropolitan, at 1227 Hermosa Avenue as a temporary headquarter, the bank moved into its permanent location on the north corner at 1235 Hermosa in December 1923. This small space with a mezzanine floor was decorated with 25,000 in fixtures, furnishings, and equipment (see Figure 5). However, with the onset of the Depression in 1929, the First Bank of Hermosa Beach and the First National Bank of Hermosa Beach ran into hard times. The First Bank of Hermosa Beach was forced to close its doors in 1932. The First National Bank of Hermosa Beach, which was granted National Bank Charter in 1922, was also closed by the Administration of National Banks in Washington, DC in 1932. The competitor, the National Bank, survived to 1929 and was absorbed into the Bank of America in that same year. Other first flo0r occupants included J.H. (John Henry)Kibler Realtor and a millinery store called Chapeaux. J.H. Kibler Realtor temporarily occupied the small space at 1229 Hermosa until the bank moved to its new quarters at which time Kibler moved into the space at 1227 Hermosa. The millinery store occupied the small space at 1229 Hermosa in early 1924. When the First Bank of Hermosa Beach closed its doors in 1932 the space at 1235 was occupied by various retail businesses including a shoe shop called the Modern Shoe Shop and a women's clothing shop called Mode O'Day. The 1947 City Directory states that a restaurant called "The Valroy" occupied the unit at 1227 Hermosa for some unknown duration. The offices on the second floor with an address of 1231 Hermosa (later changed to 1233) were occupied by doctors, dentists, and engineers including Herbert R. Taylor, a consulting engineer; Dr. H.F. Craven, a dentist; Dr. H.O. Bower, a chiropractor; and Mrs. R.W. Meyer another chiropractor. Throughout the years the second floor remained occupied with individuals primarily in the medical field. In 1952, the West Basin Municipal Water District occupied a suite on the second floor. 1 Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999 Page 12 429 I c R„.:- .. . F a X1.1+' its f i- riff. f7 t , 7' _' fl ! 3 r-----;":".....— , fir.;.,...t I 1.- 7 i NI P t1 I€€+1«1(€l ll' (ix'- il€ f w ,„ ,,.,,.... 24 -=-- ter i'YT` } 7 1 I X . 1 f i Metropolitan Theatre Building east elevation (c. 1923) k k l; 1 ( f P . i$1 ' r, r .i l` t. l ZrS ce.- R j#. 1 if i' llit ...littrllA t1 II' I MI Ili ft r f c I Metropolitan Theatre Building - First Bank of Hermosa Beach interior(c. 1924) I I li 1116i PCR Figure 5 Historic Photographs Source:Hermosa Beach Historical Society 430 111II. Environmental Setting On August 17, 1923, the Hermosa Beach Review announced the formal opening of the Hermosa Beach Masonic Club located in the large, southern half of the third floor. The room was described as having a polychrome finish and detailing, a domed ceiling and indirect lighting. The Masonic Club held weekly "theme" dances for the local community residents. In the north half of the floor,the Hermosa Beach Masonic Lodge number 528(later changed to 557)was beginning to organize and went about its fraternal business meeting every Wednesday night. 4. American Movie Theatre History The history of the movie theatre begins at the dawn of the 20th century, with the first nickelodeons built by a few visionary entrepreneurs. Here, patrons watched flickering black and white images, generally ten-minute silent melodramas or comedies. By the early 1910s, a decade after the first nickelodeon had opened, film makers had begun to produce photoplays and more developed narratives captured on celluloid. In this form the motion picture graduated from the cramped nickelodeons to established larger theatres with seats for hundreds or even thousands of patrons. Still, what we have come to know as movies were not quite mature enough to go out on their own; instead, they supplemented vaudeville acts, then in their prime. It was only after World War I that theatres built primarily to showcase silent motion pictures were opened in any great number. Vaudeville remained popular, but the theatre marquees of the day showed that the "silents" had gained equal billing or better. This dual presentation policy was institutionalized by the so-called combination houses, equipped with a full complement of stage equipment as well as a screen and projectors. Vaudevillians were not the only live performers at the new motion picture theatres. The great organists of the day rose with their consoles from the depth of the organ pits before film presentations and during intermissions. Best known of the organ models was the Wurlitzer, manufactured by the Rudolph Wurlitzer Company of North Tonawonda, N.Y. These instruments enabled organists to reproduce the effects of a full orchestra, along with such unlikely sounds as cuckoo clocks, train whistles, and sleigh bells. The organ consoles were usually as elaborately decorated as the surrounding auditorium spaces. By the 1920s the picture theatre with all its trappings, was an accepted and cherished part of American life. Theatre openings and movie premieres drew crowds far in excess of the number of patrons who could actually see each show. Movies came of age in the 1930s, as enhanced sound effects meshed easily with the action flickering on the screen. Yet the boom of theatre building had already passed. The heady rush to build ever-more elaborate and larger theatres from 1927 to 1929 resulted in an over abundance of picture palaces with too many seats to fill. The economic hardships of the Depression Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999 Page 14 431 I II. Environmental Setting i eventually fostered some commercial creativity on the part of theatre owners. Extravagant Ipromotional stunts were developed in attempts to boost box office totals. Rarely able to bring in movie stars for Hollywood-style grand openings or premieres, theatre owners in smaller cities I resorted to offering free china to their patrons. Others held "Bank Night" money giveaways or other special contests sometimes sponsored by the local businesses or charities. During World War II, booths selling war stamps and bonds replaced promotional displays in the lobbies. A few Iyears after the war ended, theatregoers again began to slip with the advent of television. This decline left theatre owners highly vulnerable when in the 1960s urban renewal and the movement to the suburbs began. The over build in the 1930s led directly to the demolition of older theatresIinthe1960s. For those theatres hanging on, the options to keep going were limited. Theatre owners responded with creative,although somewhat destructive solutions to their problems. Some I subdivided their auditoriums. Some owners chose to revive their long dormant stage apparatus to put on live rock shows, supplementing dwindling movie revenues. For all the abuse suffered by these theatres during rock concerts, at least some of the doors stayed open. I 5. American Movie Theatre Property Types 1920s - 1930s As movie-going became an established practice across the country, patrons witnessed the birth of a distinctly modern and quintessentially American architectural creation: the motion 1 picture palace 1920s and 1930s. While the downtown theatres became known as movie palaces the small towns boasted having Bijous. The unique development and functional necessities of the I film business demanded more than imitation. The architects of this new building type were faced with complex needs requiring a vast collection of rooms under one roof. These theatres were built essentially to serve a purpose that was purely economic: attracting moviegoers to the box office. ITheir exteriors helped fill this role, using forms and styles that made them stand out from their surroundings. Creative owners took advantage of stock terra cotta ornament to embellish the I fronts of their theatres. A broad canopy marquee, often accompanied by a towering vertical sign, announced the building's name and purpose. To make sure that nobody missed the message or the latest film, tracer and chaser lights were used to trim these often elaborate signs. To help sell Itickets, ornately decorated box offices were introduced in the 1920s. Inside, the architects sought to impress theatre goers with an abundance of lobby space. Chair stands were often tailored to Imatchthe decor of the theatre. The auditorium lighting had to be sufficiently bright for patrons to find their seats, but otherwise subdued for proper atmosphere and film viewing. Cove lighting was one solution; concealed by ornamental surfaces, cove lights bathed the auditorium in a soft I multicolor glow. Backstage equipment included the usual rigging and lighting for stage performers. Asbestos curtains were included to shield the audience in case of a fire on stage. Organ consoles in the orchestra pit required great chambers filled with pipes and related Iparaphernalia on both sides of the proscenium. Dressing rooms were provided for actors as well IArchitectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation Page 15 January 1999 432 II. Environmental Setting as musicians. Architects developed circulation patterns to ensure safety and convenience. Aiding their efforts were the theatre's own traffic cops, the ushers, many of them uniformed and trained like a drill unit. It all added up to an amazing array of architectural and human engineering feats fitted together in a unique building type. And the decoration of these picture palaces made them still more unique. 6. Metropolitan Theatre Architect: Richard Douglas King (1879-1945) was the architect of the Metropolitan Theatre Building. He appears to have been a prolific, but little known architect. During his forty year career in southern California he designed a wide variety of buildings including theatres, apartment buildings, office buildings, industrial buildings, schools, and public facilities. Among some of the buildings he designed include the Bank of America building and the Club Sushi building both located at the intersection of Pier and Hermosa Avenues in Hermosa Beach, Vernon City Hall demolished), the San Raphael School in Los Angeles, the Professional Building on Hollywood Boulevard in Los Angeles, the Sparkletts plant in Eagle Rock, and the French Chateauesque style Villa Riviera Apartments in Long Beach. Though a resident of Hermosa Beach, he maintained his architectural practice in Los Angeles. King's work is mentioned in several architectural books including Gebhard and Winter's Architecture in Los Angeles: A Compleat Guide; Los 1 Angeles: An Architectural Guide; and A Guide to Architecture in Los Angeles and Southern California. He is also examined and illustrated in the book The Architecture of Los Angeles by Paul Gleye. B. ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION 1. Exterior Built in 1923, of masonry construction, the Bijou Theatre Building is an elaborately designed Neoclassical style commercial building consisting of two contiguous parts. Located at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and 13th Street the rectangular shaped building is situated east and west on five lots with the primary (front) elevation facing east. The three-story office portion faces Hermosa Avenue and is capped with a flat roof. The one-story auditorium occupies the majority of the building and is located at the rear (west) behind the commercial portion. The auditorium is capped with a gambrel shaped steel truss roof and, at the far west end, a flat roof with a parapet fly tower to house the stage rigging equipment. The composition of the building is symmetrical and formal. Though the entire building is constructed of unreinforced red brick, the primary facade and those small portions of the south and north facades which wrap around the Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999 Page 16 433 II. Environmental Setting 111 store fronts and can be seen from Hermosa Avenue are clad in terra cotta. The two-story facade Icontains seven bays each divided by ornate terra cotta clad pilasters. Large expanses of glass on the first floor and tripartite windows on the second story also punctuate this facade. The pilasters I are primarily fluted(except for their bases)and are capped with Ionic capitals and acanthus leaves. Classically influenced spandrels divide the first and second floors. Store fronts, each consisting of three bays, occupy the two front corners of the building. Entry into these spaces is through I the central bay. While the entryway into the small commercial space on the southeast corner is unadorned, the entrance into the commercial space on the northeast corner features an entablature decorated with festoons and urns, a recessed transom window with grillwork, and a large Icartouche. The recessed theatre foyer (entrance) is centrally located along the primary elevation and is marked by a large protruding marquee (not original). An impressive cornice runs along I the primary facade, the commercial/banking portion of the north elevation, and a small portion of the south elevation. This cornice is decorated with dentils, egg and dart molding, and interlaced bead and fret work. The building was originally designed with a classically inspired Iroofline balustrade along its primary elevation. This balustrade hid the setback portion of the third floor. At some unknown time, the balusters were modified and the ornate plaster castings I were removed only remnants of the balustrade are still visible. Though before it was modified, portions of the roofline balustrade detailings, including some plaster cast cartouches, were saved and are now on display at the Hermosa Beach Historical Society. Other than the terra cotta Iveneer that wraps around the store front corners, the north and south elevations contain little exterior ornamentation. The south elevation is divided by pilasters and punctuated by three I recessed entries, two standard single door exits and one large stage door, all of which retain their original wooden doors and arched entryways. The north elevation is also divided by pilasters and contains three entries. However, the doors and entryways have been modified on this elevation Iand do not retain their original materials and configuration. Both the north and south elevations have fire escapes attached to them. The west(rear)elevation is completely void of ornamentation, Ifenestration,and entryways. Only a small, rectangular shaped vent opening highlights this facade. 2. Interior Ia. Theatre IThe theatre itself consists of three sections: the foyer, lobby, and auditorium. The foyer is centrally located off the primary elevation along Hermosa Avenue. It is a single-story space, I recessed under the marque and offices above. Large rectangular shaped display windows hang from each side of the foyer. These display windows held the posters that advertised the movie features of the week. The foyer is paved with small unglazed clay tile blocks and is unadorned 1 IArchitectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation Page 17 January 1999 434 II. Environmental Setting of detailing. A footprint in the glazed tile flooring of where a small ticket booth was located is visible is the center of the foyer. The lobby space of the theatre, located adjacent to the foyer and accessed via three pairs of double glass paned doors, is a large single-story space, semi-circular in plan, with ornate classical detailing. This detailing includes textured walls, cove ceilings, wood baseboards, large plaster casted scallop shells with feline figures at each base; tall, thin Solomonic columns capped with the Greek theatre faces of Tragedy and Comedy; and ornate plaster cove molding. The ornate lobby area today contains a snack bar, drinking fountain, a telephone alcove and a small ticket office. The mens' and women's public restrooms are adjacent the lobby to the south. The configuration of the restrooms have been modified in size and shape. The women's restroom contains a small circular shaped "retiring room" or "anteroom." The women's and men's public restrooms (toilet rooms)have concrete floors and ceramic tile walls, pink for the women and blue for the men, extending up 12 tiles from the floor continuing to the ceiling with a smooth plaster finish. Stalls and plumbing fixtures in both rooms have been replaced. t The interior arrangement of the auditorium faces west and is approximately 92' by 95' and 29' high with a 45 foot high fly tower. The large open room, which has been subdivided into two spaces, contains the original racking floor, approximately 12 rows of metal framed theatre type seats set in a long curve pattern, a raised stage, a decorative proscenium arch, four entryways, two emergency exits, a fly gallery over the stage area and stage dressing rooms. As with the lobby area and exterior of the building, the auditorium interior is styled after the classical orders of architecture and contain plaster molded swags, flowers, dancing fairies, and the theatrical masks "Tradegy and Comedy" illustrating the spirit of entertainment. A wide decorative frieze, depicting the muses of vaudeville-Song, Dance, Music, and Drama, runs along the north, south, and east walls, as well as small portions of the west wall. Both the north and south walls are visually divided evenly with three pairs of thin ornate Solomonic columns. These columns are set on tall pedestals and are capped with the Greek theatre faces of Tragedy and Comedy on their capitals. The two doorframes (entryways)leading into the auditorium from the lobby and the two on each side of the stage and leading to the backstage area from the auditorium are ornately shaped and are framed with cyma moldings (both recta and reversa). The stage area is small measuring approximately 75' x 20' in size. Movie screens (one on either side of the subdivided auditorium) have been placed in front of the stage hiding the proscenium arch and stage area. Two large stage doors, located on the north and south elevations, open onto the sides of the stage area. Located on the north side of the backstage are five small intact dressing rooms approximately 5' x 6')originally used by the vaudeville entertainers of the 1920s and 1930s. The walls of these dressing rooms are of shiplap wood siding and are intact. The walls and ceiling of the auditorium have been insulated with sound proofing material. In addition, they are painted Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999 Page 18 435 II. Environmental Setting black as are most of the auditorium's decorative detailing. A suspended mechanical type light fixture hangs from the ceiling of each theatre space. rb. Second Floor The second floor of the building was originally designed to contain offices which it still does. Though it has been slightly modified and now contains fourteen offices of varying sizes originally designed with ten offices), storage spaces, restrooms, a wide hallway/lobby space with two original cast iron radiators, a wood staircase with original wood balustrade, and the projection booth. Most offices retain their originally entryways consisting of diffused glass paneled doors with diffused glass sidelights and transom windows. The majority of the offices are punctuated by at least one large tripartite window and face out onto surface streets. The walls of the offices are of lath and plaster while the floors are of wood. The second floor is equipped with fire sprinklers which are attached to the ceiling and are visible in all areas. c. Third Floor Originally designed to house the local Masonic lodge, the third floor of the commercial portion of this building contains two large voluminous rooms (each containing approximately 1,700 square-feet), various small storage spaces, restrooms, and office space. The north room is punctuated by skylights and windows along the west elevation only while the south room contains windows along the south and west elevations. Windows are fixed framed or are the aluminum framed sliding type. A few of the original ceiling light fixtures hang from the north room. The third floor has a wood floor that is carpeted. d. Commercial Storefronts The southeast storefront is a small single-story space (approximately 726 square feet), rectangular in plan, and three bays wide. The interior space has a high ceiling and contains a mezzanine with staircase, a restroom, and limited storage space. The interior commercial space is devoid of ornamental detailing and furnishings. The northeast storefront is a slightly larger (approximately 841 square feet), single-story space, rectangular in plan, and three bays wide. Entry into the commercial space is via a recessed entrance with transom windows located in the central bay. The interior of this space has a high, ornate plaster ceiling; a mezzanine and staircase; a restroom; and storage space. The entire interior space is highly ornate with classical detailing. Three large mirror panes occupy the south Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation Page 19 January 1999 436 II. Environmental Setting wall each is framed with gold trim and highlighted with modillions and rosettes. Between these mirror panes are floor to ceiling engaged, square plaster columns each with ornate capitals of an allegorical figure and acanthus leaves. Similar columns divide the large expanses of display windows along the north side of the room into five bays. An ornate plaster molding of rosettes and acanthus leaves highlight each wall of this interior space. The mezzanine balustrade is also highly ornate with decorative urns and interesting spindle work. Other than the wall, ceiling, and mezzanine ornamentation, the interior space is devoid of furnishings. e. Alterations Exterior alterations to the Bijou Theatre Building include slight modifications to the primary (east) facade; replacement of original wood doors with metal hollow metal doors along the north elevation; the removal and replacement of the original vertical marquee and the projecting neon light marquee from the 1930s with a modern metal and plastic marquee; the addition and removal of a foyer ticket booth; modification of the roofline balustrade; replacement of some original wood frame sash windows with aluminum sliding windows along the south and west elevations; and relocation of the entrance and stairway to the second and third floors from the first floor or street level (see Figure 6). Interior alterations to the building include removal of the polychrome ornamentation in the Mason's Lodge spaces on the third floor; the large dividing wall down the center of the auditorium; removal of the $20,000 Robert Morgan organ; removal and damage to some original ornamental decorations in the lobby and auditorium areas; removal of original auditorium lighting fixtures and snack bar in lobby; replacement of etched window panes in glass paneled entry doors in the foyer; modifications to the configuration of the public restrooms (done some time in the 1930s); the reupholstery of the original leather auditorium seats with vinyl/cloth material. The theatre was original designed with approximately 1200 seats, though that number varied from 800 to 900 to 1200 depending on the theatre promoter. The auditorium had four aisles, two semi-center aisles and two side aisles. When the large room was subdivided into two smaller theatres each side retained two aisles in their original configuration. Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation Page 20 January 1999 437 I I I l x I 1,:j y OS r ,,....... 2 I + 1'0...;I: pk 1 li,:4: 1'; • . 1 I '. - I. i 10 if- 1 73 w IBijou Cinemas looking northwest(1998) ellisso fir M iii., ,,, 7;* '''''''''' 1 7.-,:. , . 40 -.-... 11.--;/- .„----: . --.., -4.1,...,2; .... —t-,1 .----,1,,,,' iii ti, 3,, 11. 1,t; i I I 1.1, „.:"-- ,.-i-2-.. ..,,.•• -, i.,,: 6,4 I u s , , i., ,,, t., ..,,..„, i„. _ ,iii e il,:.1/42-,,, e • 1 it,- 4.....,. 4 '' \ r _ + Z ta Y MR ','4 . I Bijou Cinemas looking southwest(1998) I I II,iI i, Figure 6 Current Photographs IISource:PCR 1998 438 1 III. ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC RESOURCES I A. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION In analyzing the historic significance of the Bijou Theatre Building, criteria for designation under federal, state, and local landmark programs were considered. The Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) survey methodology was used to evaluate the relative significance of properties. 1. National Register of Historic Places First authorized by the Historic Sites Act of 1935, the National Register of Historic Places National Register) was established by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as "an authoritative guide to be used by Federal, State, and local governments, private groups and citizens to identify the Nation'g cultural resources and to indicate what properties should be considered for protection from destruction or impairment.i2 The National Register recognizes properties that are significant at the national, state and local levels. To be eligible for listing in the National Register, the quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture must be present in a district, site, building, structure, or object that possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and:3 A. is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; B. is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; IC. embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type,period, or method of construction or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 36 Section 60.2. 3 Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms,National Register Bulletin 16, U.S.Department of Interior, National Park Service, September 30, 1986("National Register Bulletin 16"). This bulletin contains technical information on comprehensive planning, survey of cultural resources and registration in the National Register of Historic Places. Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation Page 22 January 1999 439 III. Analysis of Historic Resources I represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; D. yields, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. A property eligible for the National Register must meet one or more of the four criteria A-D)defined above. In addition, unless the property possesses exceptional significance, it must be at least fifty years old to be eligible for National Register listing. In addition to meeting the criteria of significance, a property must have integrity. "Integrity is the ability of a property to convey its significance. i4 According to National Register Bulletin 15, within the concept of integrity, the National Register criteria recognizes seven aspects or qualities that, in various combinations,define integrity. To retain historic integrity a property will always possess several, and usually most, of these seven aspects. The retention of specific aspects of integrity is paramount for a property to convey its significance. 5 The seven factors that define integrity are location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. The following is excerpted from National Register Bulletin 15 which provides guidance on the interpretation and application of these factors: Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred.6 Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property.' Setting is the physical environment of a historic property.' I 4 National Register Bulletin 15, p. 44. 5 Ibid 6 " The relationship between the property and its location is often important to understanding why the property was created or why something happened. The actual location of a historic property, complemented by its setting is particularly important in recapturing the sense of historic events and persons. Except in rare cases, the relationship between a property and its historic associations is destroyed if the property is moved." Ibid. 111 A property's design reflects historic functions and technologies as well as aesthetics. It includes such considerations as the structural system; massing; arrangement of spaces;pattern of fenestration; textures and colors of surface materials; type, amount, and style of ornamental detailing; and arrangement and type of plantings in a designed landscape."Ibid. 8 National Register Bulletin 15,p.45. Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation page 23 January 1999 440 1 III. Analysis of Historic Resources I Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property. 9 Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory)° Feeling is a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time." Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property. 12 In assessing a property's integrity, the National Register criteria recognize that properties change over time, therefore, it is not necessary for a property to retain all its historic physical features or characteristics. The property must retain, however, the essential physical features that enable it to convey its historic identity.t3 For properties which are considered significant under National Register Criteria A and B, National Register Bulletin 15 states that a property that is significant for its historic association is eligible if it retains the essential physical features that made up its character or appearance during the period of its association with the important event, historical pattern, or person(s).t4 In assessing the integrity of properties which are considered significant under National Register Criterion C, National Register Bulletin 15 provides that a property important for I 9 " The choice and combination ofmaterials reveals the preferences ofthose who created the roe andPfpropertyrh' indicated the availability of particular types of materials and technologies. Indigenous materials are often the focus of regional building traditions and thereby help define an area's sense of time and place." 10 "Workmanship can apply to the property as a whole or to its individual components. It can be expressed in vernacular methods of construction and plain finishes or in highly sophisticated configurations and ornamental detailing. It can be based on common traditions or innovative period techniques." (Emphasis added.) Ibid. It results from the presence ofphysical features that, taken together, convey the property's historic character." Ibid. 12 " A property retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, associations requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. . . Because feeling and associated depend on individual perceptions, their retention alone is never sufficient to support eligibility of a property for the National Register."Ibid. 13 1 1 4 National Register Bulletin 15, p. 46. Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation Page 24 January 1999 441 I III. Analysis of Historic Resources illustrating a particular architectural style or construction technique must retain most of the physical features that constitute that style or technique.15 The primary effect of listing in the National Register on private property owners of historic buildings is the availability of financial and tax incentives.16 In addition, for projects which receive federal funding, the Section 106 clearance process must be completed. State and local laws and regulations may apply to properties listed in the National Register. For example, demolition or inappropriate alteration of National Register eligible or listed properties may be subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 2. California Register of Historical Resources The California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) was established to be a comprehensive listing of California's historic resources, including those of national, state and local significance. The California Register was established in 1992 by the State Legislature with the passage and signature of Assembly Bill (AB) 2881. The criteria for eligibility for the California Register are based upon National Register criteria.'' Certain resources are determined by the statute to be included in the California Register, including California properties formally determined eligible for, or listed in, the National Register of Historic Places.18 While owner consent is required to list a privately owned resource, the statute provides that if "private property cannot be presently listed in the California Register solely because of owner objection, the Commission shall nevertheless designate the property as eligible for listing.19 In January 1998 the state regulations implementing the California Register of Historical Resources(The California Register Regulations)became effective.20 As provided in the California Register Regulations, the California Register consists of historical resources that are (a) listed tautomatically; (b) listed following procedures and criteria adopted by the State Historical I 15 " A property that has lost some historic materials or details can be eligible if it retains the majority of the features that illustrate its style in terms of the massing, spatial relationships,proportion,pattern of windows and doors, texture of materials, and ornamentation. The property is not eligible, however, if it retains some basic features conveying massing but has lost the majority of the features that once characterized its style." Ibid. 16 See 36 CFR 60.2 (b)-(c). 17 See Code Section 5024.1 (b). 18 See Code Section 5024.1 (d). 19 See Code Section 5024.1(b). 20 The California Register Regulations are codified at 14 California Code of Regulations ("CCR") §4850, et. seq. Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation Page 25 January 1999 442 1 III. Analysis of Historic Resources 111 Resources Commission (State Commission); and (c) nominated by an application and listed after a public hearing process.21 Historical resources that are automatically listed in the California Register consist of the following: California historical resources listed in, or formally determined eligible for, the National Register of Historic Places. . . "Formally determined eligible" for the purpose of this section means determined eligible through one of the federal preservation programs administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Specifically, these programs are the National Register, Tax Certification Evaluation of Significance, Part 1, 36 CFR Part 67), and National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106, 16 U.S.C. 4701) reviews of federal undertakings. California Registered Historical Landmarks, henceforth Landmarks, from No. 770 onward.22 Other resources are listed upon review and action by the State Commission, including landmarks with numbers preceding 770 and California Points of Historical Interest.23 Historical resources which may be nominated to the California Register include: A historical resource or historic district; A historical resource contributingto the significance of a nominated historic district;g A group of historical resources identified in historic resource surveys, if the survey meets the criteria and standards of documentation listed in Section 4852 (e); 1 A historical resource, a group of historical resources, or historic districts designated or listed as city or county landmarks or historical resources or districts pursuant to any city or county ordinance, if the criteria for designation or listing under the ordinance have been reviewed by the Office as meeting the California Register criteria as stated in this chapter and approved by the Commission; or 1 1 21 California Register Regulations 14 CCR §4851. az California Register Regulations 14 CCR §4851(a). 23 California Register Regulations 14 CCR §4851(b). Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation Page 26 January 1999 1 443 III. Analysis of Historic Resources A historical resource or a group of local landmarks or historical resources designated under any municipal or county ordinance which has not been previously approved by the Office.24 1 For surveyed resources to qualify for nominations, the resources must meet California Register significance criteria and the survey documentation must meet California Office of Historic Preservation standards.0 In particular, the California Register Regulations provides that if the survey meets the standards, the Office shall recommend to the Commission that all resources with a significance rating of category 1 through 4, or any subcategories thereof, on DPR Form 523 be listed in the California Register. The Office shall review all category 5 determinations for consistency with the California Register criteria of significance as found in Section 4852 (b) of this chapter. 3. California Office of Historic Preservation Survey Methodology The California Office of Historic Preservation utilizes a three digit evaluation code consisting of seven categories to specify National Register eligibility. The evaluation instructions and classification system used by the California Office of Historic Preservation are provided in its Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. The first digit indicates one of the following general evaluation categories for use in conducting cultural resource surveys:26 1. Listed on the National Register of Historic Places 1 2. Determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places 3. Appears eligible for the National Register of Historic Places 1 4. May become eligible for the National Register of Historic Places 5. Not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, but of local interest 6. None of the above 7. Undetermined The second digit is a letter code indicating whether the resource is separately eligible (S), eligible as part of a district(D), or both(B). The third digit is a number which is used to further specify whether or not a resource is eligible under a local ordinance. Under this system categories 1 through 4 pertain to various levels of National Register eligibility. The California Register, 1 24 California Register Regulations 14 CCR §4851(c). 25 California Register Regulations 14 CCR §4852(b)(1)-(4) and 4852(e). 26 California Register Regulations 14 CCR and 4852 (e)(1). Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999Page27 444 1 III. Analysis of Historic Resources however, may include surveyed resources through level 5 (e.g., structures evaluated as of local interest in the planning process even if they are ineligible for listing in the National Register). 4. City of Hermosa Beach Historic Resource Preservation Ordinance The City of Hermosa Beach enacted a Historic Resource Preservation Ordinance in October 1998, which defines landmark designation for the City. According to the ordinance, an historic resource may be designated a landmark if it meets one or more of the following criteria: A. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history; or B. It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history; or C. It embodies distinctive characteristics of style, type, period, or method of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or D. It is representative of the notable work of a builder, designer, or architect; or E. Its unique location or singular physical characteristic(s) represents an established and familiar visual feature or landmark of a neighborhood, community, or the City. 111 In order to be eligible for consideration as a landmark, an historic resource must be at least 50 years old; with the exception that an historic resource of at least 30 years old may be eligible if the City Council determines that the resource is exceptional, or that it is threatened by demolition, removal, relocation, or inappropriate alteration. 1 I 1 1 Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation Page 28 January 1999 1 445 I IV. HISTORIC RESOURCES SIGNIFICANCE I The Bijou Theatre Building is the second and only extant of two theatres constructed in town that served the City during the first half of the 20th Century. According the Hermosa Beach Review, the local paper of the time, the Bijou Theatre Building was designed with three stories: the main floor occupied by the First Bank of the Hermosa Beach, the Metropolitan Theatre, and another shop. The second floor containing facilities for offices, and the third floor occupied by the Masonic Lodge and Club. Upon conclusion of the identification and evaluation process, the Bijou Theatre Building appears eligible for listing in the National Register based on Criteria A and C at the local level of significance. In addition the property also appears eligible for state listing and local landmark designation. A. NATIONAL REGISTER 1. Criterion A: Historical Significance The property appears eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion A for its strong association with the early social and economic history of Hermosa Beach. The theatre displays integrity of association, feeling, and setting; it illustrates a significant theme in American culture: entertainment. The Bijou Theatre Building is the oldest theatrical type structure in Hermosa Beach; in addition it is one of the oldest buildings in the City. Its unique character and its role it played in the theatre arts industry make it a building worthy of being characterized as a building of importance to the local community. The theatre has long been an architectural and cultural focal point of the City. In addition to its cultural significance, the Bijou had an important role in the financial success of the surrounding area. Though the building was the third location for the First Bank of Hermosa it was the first banking institution established (1912) in the City. The oil boom of the early 1920s surged economic growth throughout the southland and brought prosperity for many. It also resulted in extensive building and developing of many downtown areas including Hermosa Beach. During this prosperous period, local business leaders from the 1 First Bank of Hermosa Beach were eagerly anticipating continuing growth and development. With such growth and development within the City, the First Bank of Hermosa Beach also grew to a point where they needed larger, more modern type banking facility. The bank's directorates also saw a greater interest from the public for entertainment. Hence, in 1923, they financed the Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999Page29 446 IV. Historic Resources Significance 111 construction of the Metropolitan Theatre Bank Building. This new building offered banking and entertainment opportunities all under one roof. The shops, offices, and bank within the building also played a significant role in the financing and livelihood of the building. 2. Criterion C: Architectural Significance The Bijou Theatre Building appears eligible for listing in the National Register based on Criterion C at the local level of significance as a prime example of the Neo-classical style and also as an example of the work of a notable local architect Richard Douglas King. The theatre building displays integrity of materials, workmanship, location, and design. By the 1920s, the Neo-classicism had become one of the dominant architectural styles in California for financial institutions. The revived interest in classical architecture dates from the World's Columbian Exposition, held in Chicago in 1893. The exposition's planners mandated a classical theme, and many of the best know architects of the day designed dramatic colonnaded buildings. The exposition was widely photographed, reported, and attended; soon these Neo- classical models became the latest fashion throughout the country. A revival style, Neo-classicism is based primarily on Greek and to a lesser extent on Roman orders, producing symmetrically arranged buildings of monumental proportions. Colossal pedimented porticos are flanked by a series of pilasters. The arch is not used and enriched moldings are kept to a minimum. The preference was for simple geometric forms and smooth surfaces. The design was based on the assembly of separate volumes, each dedicated to a single function. Neo-classical architecture represented America's wealthy and solid mercantile class. The Bijou Theatre Building embodies the distinguishing character-defining features of the Neo-classical style with its symmetrically balanced facade, monumental scale,grouped casements, roofline balustrade, colossal pilasters, and a flat roof. Designed with a financial institution in mind, the building's importance within the city is visually indicated by its prominent Neoclassical architectural styling. Richard Douglas King,the architect of the theatre, was born in Jackson, Tennessee in 1879 to the parents of Robert B. King and Mary Kate Douglas King. He appears to have been a prolific, but little known architect. During his forty year career in southern California he designed a wide variety of buildings including theatres, apartment buildings, office buildings, industrial buildings, schools, and public facilities. Among some of the buildings he designed include the Bank of America building and the Club Sushi building both located at the intersection of Pier and Hermosa Avenues in Hermosa Beach, Vernon City Hall (demolished), the San Raphael School in Los Angeles, the Professional Building on Hollywood Boulevard in Los Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation Page 30 January 1999 447 I IV. Historic Resources Significance 111 Angeles, the Sparkletts plant in Eagle Rock, and the French Chateauesque style Villa Riviera Apartments in Long Beach. Within Hermosa Beach, King designed the Children's Home which served as an auxiliary unit for the Children's Hospital of Los Angeles in addition to the Bank of America building and the Club Sushi building both located at the intersection of Pier and Hermosa Avenues. King formed a brief professional association with Ellis W. Taylor in the mid-1910s, but appears to have primarily worked alone for most of his professional career. A long time resident of Hermosa Beach, he lived with his wife Margaret and daughter Margaret in the community and maintained his architectural practice in Los Angeles. King died in Long Beach on July 31, 1945 at the age of 66 while inspecting a ship for the Maritime Commission. King's work is mentioned in several architectural books including Gebhard and Winter's Architecture in Los Angeles: A Compleat Guide; Los Angeles: An Architectural Guide; and in A Guide to 1 Architecture in Los Angeles and Southern California. He is also examined and illustrated in The Architecture of Los Angeles by Paul Gleye. B. CALIFORNIA REGISTER The Bijou Theatre Building is eligible for listing in the California Register by virtue of the fact the statute automatically includes buildings determined eligible for listing in the National Register. In addition, Subdivision (g) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 states that an historic resource identified as significant in an historical resource survey may be listed in the California Register if the survey meets all of the criteria outlined under that Section. Thereby, the Bijou Theatre Building is eligible for listing in the California Register by virtue of the fact that it was identified as locally significant. I C. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH The Bijou appears eligible for designation as a City Landmark under Criterion A, C, D, and E of the City of Hermosa Beach Historic Preservation Ordinance for its strong association with the early social and economic history of Hermosa Beach, as a prime example of the Neo- classical architectural style, as an example of the work of Hermosa Beach resident and southland architect Richard Douglas King, and because its unique location and singular physical characteristics represent an established and familiar visual landmark of the downtown area and the City. The Bijou Theatre Building is the only extant vaudeville/movie theatre from the early 20th 1 century in the City of Hermosa Beach. It appears eligible for local designation under Criterion Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999 Page 31 1 448 1 IV. Historic Resources Significance A of the local historic preservation ordinance (Section 17.53.060) as a physical record and participant of the cultural, social, economic and architectural history and events that shaped the City of Hermosa Beach in its infancy. It is also significant for its association with the First Bank of Hermosa Beach, the first financial institution established in the City. The Bijou retains integrity of feeling, association, and setting. For further discussion of significance see Section IV.A.1. For its architectural value, the Bijou Theatre Building appears to satisfy Criterion C of the local historic preservation ordinance (Section 17.53.060). Both the exterior and some portions of the interior of the building retain enough historic fabric to convey its significant architectural value (See Section IV.D. Character-defining Features). The Bijou Theatre Building retains integrity of design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. For further discussion of significance see Section IV.A.2. Because of his notable work on the Bijou Theatre and elsewhere in the City and throughout the southland, including the Villa Riviera Apartments in Long Beach, Richard Douglas King appears to satisfy Criterion consideration C of the local historic preservation ordinance (Section 17.53.060). For further discussion of significance see Section IV.A.2. In addition, because of its unique and prominent location in the heart of old downtown, at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and 13`h Street, the Bijou Theatre is an established and long familiar visual landmark of the downtown community and the City. Thereby satisfying Criterion E of the local historic preservation ordinance (Section 17.53.060). D. CHARACTER-DEFINING FEATURES Character-defining features of the Bijou Theatre Building include the original materials, architectural detailing, characteristic building elements, and significant interior spaces (see Figures 7 and 8). These features include, but are not limited to: 1. Exterior: 111 brick exterior walls clad with stucco walls (integrity of materials) ornate terra cotta facade electric trolley hooks Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999 Page 32 449 1 IV. Historic Resources Significance cast terra cotta ornamentation, including spandrels, pilasters, entry surrounds, and decorative cornice roof forms and materials, including parapets, roofline balustrade, and fly tower at the west end of the auditorium roof symmetrical composition and massing 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation Page 33 January 1999 1 450 i I I I y a) ) y . y f / 1 ! t I ` II; t. 4 ,. LI V f r 4i--: i 1 0 1- 1 ::::_______,--.L' V.-:). I.fr, litil a. yi. I w -'.-w cs a,e:wrw. i n:•. -.:1VI i Lobby: Molding Detail Lobby: Ceiling Detail Lobby: Column Detail Stage: Proscenium Arch Stage: Balconette (Left) Stage: Balconette(Right) Stage: Balconette(Right) 1 QI. ,..,":N.,- . jj mss r .y y r 3 ti i 1 4 „ r f/ I f 0 " f y as 7lfiL y 1 kt5• ; 11, 1 x- I j:.. V.`w\ 'f..L•t by K' S;;,' 1 x ; M P\:: 1: 1. 1: 4:, L III 11 ys rte 1It '. 5:; Ut s'N':'''' sul,, is ... vorr, 1,Z4`y:Z......*Z4c.,,,,.,:."-. t'A.. ,,-*.. ,i,, 4 IIt 1... I 4......1.1 r Stage: Dressing Rooms tte I Stage: Proscenium Arch & Balconnette (Right) Stage: Wall Auditorium: Theatre Chair Auditorium: Cyma Doorframe 1:F: : 1 t. • a – – :„,:: 4 WWI — R+J ti: r 4 TY. 1,:,.. zori,iou,......Azissimir.,.. ... r. -., 41., C.. Auditorium: Column Detailing Auditorium: North Section Auditorium: South Section Auditorium: South Section I I[!,IIh1, Figure 7 IIIIIII Character - Defining Features 1 451 I I J 1, , 1 . 11 A.`i` i ! ik,l, T .71. wz]: 4.'.1 : fir ir+ L. r!.I".' ,"' - 1.. f!'' K Oh+ et.' i.T' .' r+:u 1 ,-) 1 ` 1.fa ` ter a- f Li. 12.:-...' 1 I 4 : _ ': 7,4_. 7, 144,: al L waw.w . l r ExterioriiiiCorniceDetail IExterior: Primary Facade - Massing Exterior: Bank Entrance Exterior : Column Detail 1 N'•* ,} o._ A• ..,. Ste' ' qY 1 r t yl 1 y W 1 A 1 trt{Y Z1'i 1I ,fill tat i I. ui...../ ...,"_. Fr= ' jiiirmi0 qq 4W'lilt Fir- ! , .— t ) ill r' S'' It. 111 I I I ea ..„ 1 l tii-.. , a .., c i .rd X,d 8-1: kirougheiLs N.,— Foyer: Entrance Configuration First Floor: Bank Interior First Floor: Bank Interior I I 1 I r 1/4'4‘..iw' 'I A x ay, 4 .-: a ^ 4 5 I*. b t ' t +`ri Lai •, a `s;..• , Third Floor: Attached Third Floor: Hanging Light Fixture Light Fixture 1 I 1 i,i6I' ` P c R Figure 8 Character- Defining Features 452 IV. Historic Resources Significance I original wood-framed windows, where they are extant fenestration patterns recessed foyer and multi-door entry 2. Interior: plaster detailing in theatre lobby s ace including textured walls, cove ceilings, wood baseboards,large plaster casted scallop shells, Solomonic columns, and the ornate cove molding auditorium space, size, and overall configuration auditorium racking floor seating and aisle arrangement auditorium ornamentation including double Solomonic columns with ornate capitals, decorative frieze molding auditorium main doorframes (four) with cyma molding auditorium stage, stage wings (organ grilles), and proscenium arch auditorium backstage dressing rooms exposed brick interior wall at back of stage with noteworthy patterning(common bond) ornate interior of 1235 Hermosa Avenue which includes classically inspired motifs set in the columns, ceiling, walls, and balustrade original ceiling light fixtures (hanging and attached) on the third floor in north room 1 I Architectural Resources Survey Report Bijou Theatre Building PCR Services Corporation January 1999Page36 453 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0484 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, THAT REQUIRES MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO WEAR FACE COVERINGS; AND TO CONFIRM CITY MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 2020-09 REGARDING SUSPENDING LOCAL ZONING REGULATIONS TO PERMIT SPECIFIED BUSINESSES TO OPERATE OUTDOORS AND TO PERMIT CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS TO OPERATE WITHOUT A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOCATION DURING THE COVID-19 CRISIS (City Attorney Michael Jenkins) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1.Confirm City Manager/Director of Emergency Services Executive Order No.2020-09,to temporarily permit:(1)gyms,fitness facilities,hair salons,barbershops and personal care establishments to operate outdoors and (2)home occupations to operate without a commercial business location during the COVID-19 crisis (Attachment 1); and 2.Adopt an Urgency Ordinance No.20-1415U of the City of Hermosa Beach,to implement the measures in Executive Order No.2020-09 and to require members of the public to wear face coverings whenever outside of their place of residence (Attachment 2). The urgency ordinance requires four-fifths vote of the City Council and if approved, will take effect immediately. Background: On March 15,2020,the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”)declared a state of local emergency in response to the global pandemic caused by a respiratory disease which has been named “COVID-19”.At a special meeting on March 16,2020,the City Council adopted Resolution No. 20-7230, approving and confirming the declaration of emergency. On March 19,2020,the Governor of the State of California,issued Executive Order N-33-20 an City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 6 powered by Legistar™454 Staff Report REPORT 20-0484 On March 19,2020,the Governor of the State of California,issued Executive Order N-33-20 an Order of the State Public Health Officer ordering all individuals living in California to stay home or at their place of residence except as needed to maintain continuity of operations of outlined federal critical infrastructure sectors. Evidence in late April and early May demonstrated that state and local orders slowed the increase of community transfer of the disease by limiting interactions amongst people.As a result,on May 7, 2020,Governor Newsom,announced a four-staged framework,titled “Resilience Roadmap”that is intended to guide the state’s gradual modification of its Safer at Home Order to reopen California. The state also issued sector specific guidance to help specified businesses reopen under new restrictions, which require businesses to, among other things, implement social distancing measures. In line with the State’s health guidance,the Los Angeles County Public Health Officer issued a revised Order on May 13,2020 entitled “Continuation of Safer at Home Order that begins to move the County of Los Angeles into Stage 2 of the County’s Roadmap to Recovery,”that authorized some limited retail and outdoor recreation venues to reopen subject to among other things,social distancing measures to prevent the further spread of COVID-19.The Order was updated again on May 26th,May 29th,June 11th and June 18th,2020 to continue to allow the gradual reopening of additional sectors including bars,hair salons,personal care establishments (including esthetician, skin care and cosmetology services;electrology;nail salons;body art professionals,tattoo parlors, microblading and permanent make-up;and piercing shops;and massage therapy),gyms and fitness facilities subject to social distancing measures.The May 29th Order for example,permitted restaurants and food facilities to remain open and offer limited dine-in seating.The Order also encouraged restaurants to expand outdoor seating where possible in compliance with local zoning codes to comply with social distancing requirements. To assist in the economic recovery of local businesses and restaurants,on May 26,2020,the City Manager issued Executive Order No.2020-05 to temporarily suspend City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050 (B),(C)and 17.44.030 regarding off-street parking requirements for commercial and business uses.Many surrounding cities,including Los Angeles,Pasadena,and Long Beach also implemented similar rules and regulations to assist in the economic recovery of these businesses during the COVID-19 crisis. Since that time,the State and County have seen a sharp increase in confirmed COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations,and the timing of these increases is in line with the reopening of “high risk” businesses where individuals may congregate with members who are not part of the same household and remove their face coverings to eat and drink.As a result,the County Health Officer issued a revised Order on July 1,2020 to backtrack on the County’s gradual reopening to prohibit indoor dining and order the immediate closure of bars, wineries and winery tasting rooms. On July 13,2020,the State Public Health Officer issued a state-wide Order to require the immediateCity of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 2 of 6 powered by Legistar™455 Staff Report REPORT 20-0484 On July 13,2020,the State Public Health Officer issued a state-wide Order to require the immediate closure of:(1)indoor and outdoor operations of bars,pubs,brewpubs and breweries;and (2)indoor operation of restaurant dining,movie theatres,zoos,museums,cardrooms,wineries and tasting rooms.The Order also imposes more stringent requirements on specified counties,including Los Angeles County that have appeared on the State’s monitoring list for three consecutive days to order the immediate closure of indoor operations of the following sectors:gyms and fitness facilities,places of worship,indoor protests,offices for non-critical infrastructure sectors,personal care establishments, hair salons, barbershops, and malls. The following day,on July 14,2020,the County Health Officer issued a revised Order to coincide with Governor’s July 13th Order and require the closure of indoor operations of the following establishments:malls,shopping centers,hair salons,barbershops,fitness facilities,and personal care establishments. To assist in the safe outdoor operation of hair salons,barbershops,and personal care establishments,on July 20,2020,Governor Newsom along with the State Health Officer released mandatory guidance on the outdoor operation of personal care establishments,hair salons and barbershops as permitted under its July 13th Order.Consistent with this updated state guidance,the County Health Officer updated its reopening protocol for personal care establishments,hair salons and barbershops in Appendices R and H of its Order,respectively.Appendix R expressly states that electrology,tattooing,microblading and permanent make-up and piercing may not operate outside because they are invasive procedures that require a controlled hygienic environment to be performed safely. Permitting Outdoor Operation of Gyms,Fitness Facilities,Hair Salons,Barbershops and Personal Care Establishments Under the recent State and County Health Orders,local gyms,fitness centers,hair salons, barbershops and personal care establishments that are unable to shift their operations outdoors have been forced to shut down for the second time during the COVID-19 pandemic.Many of these businesses were struggling to financially recover following the first mandatory closure in March,and some may not be able to survive a second closure.Executive Order No.2020-09 and this confirming Urgency Ordinance are intended to assist the economic recovery of these establishments and to permit them to continue to operate outdoors under State and County Health Orders by temporarily suspending local zoning regulations during the COVIID-19 crisis. In light of California Business and Professions Code section 7317,which requires that all barbershops,hair salons and cosmetology services including specified personal care services to be performed in a licensed establishment,Executive Order No.2020-09 and this confirming Urgency Ordinance are further intended to permit the outdoor operation of these businesses to the extent they are permitted do so by the State Board of Barbering and Cosmetology. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 3 of 6 powered by Legistar™456 Staff Report REPORT 20-0484 Permitting Certain Home Occupations to Operate without a Commercial Business Location State and County Stay-At-Home Orders also forced all non-essential office workspaces to close in an effort to slow the spread of COVID-19.City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code section 17.08.020(D) (14)prohibits professional offices in residential zones,that include but are not limited to:the healing arts,law,accounting,real estate,clergy,insurance and similar professional or semi-professional offices,unless the person engaged in such home occupation maintains a principal licensed office in an area permitting such activity as a principal use.Section 17.08.020(D)(14)clearly impedes on these businesses’ability to continue their home occupations in light of State and County Orders that have forced them to close their commercial office spaces. As with the specified businesses discussed above,the City Council seeks to assist City residents to continue to pursue their livelihoods from home,while complying with State and County Health Officer Orders by temporarily suspending Section 17.08.020(D)(14). Mandatory Use of Face Coverings On June 18,2020,Governor Newsom alongside the State Health Officer released mandatory health guidance that requires Californians,subject to limited exceptions to wear face coverings when outside the home.In line with the mandatory guidance,the Los Angeles County Health Officer issued a revised Order on the same date to require all persons to wear a face covering whenever they leave their place of residence and are or can be in contact with or walking near or past others who are non- household members in both public and private places whether indoors or outdoors.According to State and County Health officials,wearing face coverings reduces the risk of transmission to others who do not have symptoms and do not know that they’re infected. Recent recommendations issued by the Center for Disease Control (“CDC”)also reaffirms the use of face coverings in reducing the community spread of COVID-19.According to the CDC,laboratory studies demonstrate that cloth face coverings reduce the spray of respiratory droplets that spread the virus.COVID-19 spreads mainly among people who are in close contact with one another (within about 6 feet)so the use of cloth face coverings is particularly important in settings where people are close to each other or where social distancing is difficult to maintain. Conclusion There is no vaccine available,or proven treatment to combat the disease.At the time of writing this report,there were 161,673 confirmed cases in the County and 4,154 deaths,with July 14,2020 reporting the highest number of confirmed cases since the start of the pandemic. In line with State and County Health Orders,this Ordinance is necessary to supplement Executive Order No.2020-09 to:(1)temporarily suspend City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 4 of 6 powered by Legistar™457 Staff Report REPORT 20-0484 Order No.2020-09 to:(1)temporarily suspend City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050 (B),17.44.030,17.38.550(B)and 17.08.020(D)(14)regarding uses permitted within commercial zones,off-street parking requirements for commercial and business use,and home occupation permits to the extent they conflict with this Ordinance;and (2)require members of the public to wear face coverings when outside of their place of residence. Analysis The local economic recovery of gyms,fitness facilities,hair salon,barbershops and personal care establishments will be challenging as some of these establishments will be unable to shift their operations outdoors under State and County Health Order requirements.Relaxing local zoning regulations to temporarily allow these businesses to operate outdoors and to the extent they are permitted to do so by State licensing agencies will assist in the economic recovery of these establishments. City residents engaged in certain home occupations as defined in this Ordinance will similarly be permitted to continue to pursue their livelihood while complying with State and County Health directives.Lastly,more stringent action is required in response to the recent increase in confirmed cases and hospitalizations.Requiring members of the public to wear face coverings when outside of their place of residence will help curb the continued spread of the disease. In light of the foregoing,the proposed ordinance should be adopted on an urgency basis,to temporarily suspend City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050(B),17.44.030, 17.38.550(B)and 17.08.020(D)(14)regarding uses permitted within commercial zones,off-street parking requirements for commercial and business use,and home occupation permits,taking effect immediately pursuant to Government Code section 36937,for the preservation of the public peace, health,and safety of residents living within the City,based on the facts described herein and set forth in the Ordinance: 1.Confirm City Manager\Director of Emergency Services Executive Order No. 2020-09; and 2.Adopt Urgency Ordinance No.___to implement the measures in Executive Order No. 2020-09 and to require members of the public to wear face coverings when outside of their place of residence Fiscal Impact: The City of Hermosa Beach initially incurs all costs related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, but will submit requests for cost recovery to the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES), either directly, or through the Los Angeles County Office of Emergency Management, (LACoOEM), the local reporting agent. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 5 of 6 powered by Legistar™458 Staff Report REPORT 20-0484 Attachments: 1.Executive Order No. 2020-09. 2.Urgency Ordinance No. 20-1415 to implement the measures in Executive Order No. 2020-09 and to require members of the public to wear face coverings when outside of their place of residence Respectfully Submitted by: Michael Jenkins, City Attorney Legal Review: Michael Jenkins, City Attorney Approved:Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 6 of 6 powered by Legistar™459 Page 1 of 4 Executive Order No. 2020-09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 2020-09 EMERGENCY EXECUTIVE ORDER OF THE CITY MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, IMPLEMENTING EMERGENCY MEASURES TO TEMPORARILY PERMIT GYMS, FITNESS FACILITIES, HAIR SALONS AND BARBERSHOPS TO OPERATE OUTDOORS DURING THE COVID-19 CRISIS SECTION 1. RECITALS A. On March 15, 2020, City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) Mayor Mary Campbell, declared a local emergency to ensure an effective City response to a respiratory disease which has been named “COVID-19”. At a special meeting on March 16, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 20-7230, approving and ratifying the declaration of emergency. B. On March 19, 2020, the Governor of the State of California, issued Executive Order N-33-20, an Order of the State Public Health Officer ordering all individuals living in California to stay home or at their place of residence except as needed to maintain continuity of operations of outlined federal critical infrastructure sectors. C. Evidence in late April and early May demonstrated that state and local orders slowed the increase of community transfer of the disease by limiting interactions amongst people. As a result, on May 7, 2020, Governor Newsom, announced a four-staged framework, titled “Resilience Roadmap” that is intended to guide the state’s gradual modification of its Safer at Home Order to reopen California. The state also issued industry specific guidance to help specified businesses reopen under new restrictions, which require businesses to, among other things, implement social distancing measures. D. In line with the State’s health guidance, the Los Angeles County Public Health Officer issued a revised order on May 13, 2020 entitled “Continuation of Safer at Home Order that begins to move the County of Los Angeles into Stage 2 of the County’s Roadmap to Recovery,” that authorized some limited retail and outdoor recreation venues to reopen subject to among other things, social distancing measures to prevent the further spread of COVID-19. The order was updated again on May 26th, May 29th, June 11th and June 18th, 2020 to continue to allow the gradual reopening of additional sectors including bars, hair salons, personal care services, gyms and fitness facilities subject to social distancing measures. 460 Page 2 of 4 Executive Order No. 2020-09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 E. The May 29th order for example, permitted restaurants and food facilities to remain open and offer limited dine-in seating. The order also encouraged restaurants to expand outdoor seating where possible in compliance with local zoning codes to comply with social distancing requirements. F. To assist in the economic recovery of local businesses and restaurants, on May 26, 2020, the City Manager issued Emergency Order No. 2020-05 to temporarily suspend City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050 (B), (C) and 17.44.030 regarding off-street parking requirements for commercial and business uses. Many surrounding cities, including Los Angeles, Pasadena, and Long Beach also implemented similar rules and regulations to assist in the economic recovery of these businesses during the COVID-19 crisis. G. Since that time, the State and County have seen a sharp increase in confirmed COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations, and the timing of these increases is in line with the reopening of “high risk” businesses where individuals may congregate with members who are not part of the same household and remove their face coverings to eat and drink. As a result, the County Health Officer issued a revised order on July 1, 2020 to backtrack on the County’s gradual reopening to prohibit indoor dining and order the immediate closure of bars, wineries and winery tasting rooms. H. On July 13, 2020, the State Public Health Officer issued a state-wide order to require the immediate closure of: (1) indoor and outdoor operations of bars, pubs, brewpubs and breweries; and (2) indoor operation of restaurant dining, movie theaters, zoos, museums, cardrooms, wineries and tasting rooms. The order also imposes more stringent requirements on specified counties, including Los Angeles County that have appeared on the State’s monitoring list for three consecutive days to order the immediate closure of indoor operations of the following sectors: gyms and fitness centers, places of worship, protests, offices for non-critical infrastructure sectors, personal care establishments, hair salons, barbershops, and malls. I. The following day, on July 14, 2020, the County Health Officer issued a revised order to coincide with Governor’s July 13th Order and require the closure of indoor operations of the following establishments: malls, shopping centers, hair salons, barbershops, fitness facilities, and personal care establishments. J. Under the recent State and County health orders, local gyms, fitness centers, hair salons and barbershops that are unable to shift their operations outdoors have been forced to shut down for the second time during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many of these businesses were struggling to financially recover following the first mandatory closure in March, and some may not be able to survive a second closure. This Order is intended to assist the economic recovery of these establishments and to permit them to continue to operate under State and County 461 Page 3 of 4 Executive Order No. 2020-09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 health orders by temporarily suspending local zoning regulations during the COVIID-19 crisis. K. California Business and Professions Code section 7317 requires that all barbershops, hair salons and cosmetology services including specified personal care services, must be performed in a licensed establishment. This Order is further intended to permit the outdoor operation of these establishments as permitted by the State Board of Barbering and Cosmetology. L. This Order is necessary to temporarily suspend City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050(B), 17.44.60 and 17.38.550(B) regarding uses permitted within commercial zones and off-street parking requirements for commercial and business uses to the extent they conflict with this Order. M. This Order is adopted pursuant to the City’s police powers and powers afforded to the City in time of national, state, county and local emergency during an unprecedented health pandemic, such powers being afforded by the State Constitution, State law, and the Section 2.56.060 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to protect the peace, health, and safety of the public, and to protect life and property as affected by the emergency. SECTION 2. The provisions of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050 (B), 17.44.030 and 17.38.550(B) regarding uses permitted within commercial zones and off-street parking requirements for commercial and business uses are hereby temporarily suspended, to the extent they conflict with this Order, to allow for the implementation of item A below on a temporary basis during the term of the City, State and Los Angeles County COVID-19 emergency orders: A. “Outdoor Commercial Uses Operational Standards” have been developed by the City for the outdoor operation of: gyms, fitness centers, and hair salons and barbershops (to the extent permitted by State licensing agencies) to assist in their economic recovery and to allow them to continue to operate by permitting these establishments to operate outdoors as a result of California and Los Angeles County Health orders in response to COVID-19. The Outdoor Commercial Uses Operational Standards are set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Order is found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Order. SECTION 4. Effective Date and Termination. This Order shall become effective immediately and shall continue until the earlier to occur of: (1) the conclusion of the local emergency; (2) its termination is ordered by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services; or (3) it is duly terminated by the City Council. The Order 462 Page 4 of 4 Executive Order No. 2020-09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 may also be superseded by a duly enacted ordinance or order of the City Council expressly superseding this Order. ORDERED by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Service this 17th day of July, 2020. ATTEST: ______________________________ __________________________ Suja Lowenthal, City Manager and Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Director of Emergency Services 463 Executive Order No. 2020-09, Exhibit A Exhibit A OUTDOOR COMMERCIAL USES OPERATIONAL STANDARDS I. INTRODUCTION A. The Outdoor Commercial Uses Design and Operational Standards are adopted pursuant to Executive Order 2020-09 in order to establish specific design and operational criteria for temporary outdoor commercial uses in public and private areas. B. An outdoor commercial area is a place on private property, private parking stalls public parking stalls, public metered parking spaces where patrons may conduct commercial activities such as but not limited to gym/fitness and personal service by an adjacent commercial business. C. These standards and procedures regulate the design and operation of temporary outdoor commercial areas. However, they do not provide information on all the government agency requirements for starting a new business or expanding an existing one. Business owners must secure the appropriate licenses and permits Los Angeles County Health Department, the City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department and Business License Office. D. Temporary outdoor commercial areas shall be permitted to operate for the duration of the State of California’s Emergency Orders for COVID-19. Permission for temporary outdoor commercial areas will expire immediately upon County and State approval to reopen at capacity levels established prior to the COVID-19 pandemic limits. E. These regulations apply to outdoor commercial areas on private property and the public right-of-way. II. APPLICATION PROCEDURE A. Temporary Commercial areas that abide by the standards and procedures in this exhibit shall operate by right during the duration of the State of California’s Emergency Orders for COVID-19. B. An application for the temporary commercial area shall be provided to the Community Development Department prior to operation. C. An encroachment permit shall be required for outdoor areas in the public right-of-way. Proof of Certificate of liability insurance shall be 464 Executive Order No. 2020-09, Exhibit A provided to the Public Works Department, with the City of Hermosa Beach named as Additionally Insured, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. III. OUTDOOR AREA SITES A. The outdoor area shall be permitted on private property, public street parking or lots adjacent to the business. If the business has on-site parking, a portion of the private parking may be used for the outdoor area. B. The maximum area of either private or public areas may not exceed the loss of capacity of the interior area of the business. C. The outdoor area shall be accessible to the disabled. The buildings adjacent to these outdoor areas shall maintain building egress as defined by the Uniform Building Code and Title 24 Disabled Access Standards. D. The outdoor area shall be located within twenty feet of an outdoor food establishment. IV. DESIGN STANDARDS A. Barriers shall conform to the Public Works Director's installation standards and be removable. Barriers need not be removed each evening, but shall be capable of being removed; if imbedded into the pavement they must be fixed through the use of recessed sleeves and posts, otherwise by wheels that can be locked into place or weighted in place. No signs or banners of any kind shall be placed, displayed or erected on barriers B. The appearance should be made attractive with potted plants or other decorative elements to provide an enhanced and inviting outdoor environment. C. No additional parking shall be required for the outdoor area. To the extent feasible, if existing parking is available, parking spaces should continue to be available to customers. V. STANDARDS OF OPERATION A. Management of the commercial establishment is responsible for running and operating the outdoor area and shall not delegate or assign that responsibility. Outdoor areas shall be continuously 465 Executive Order No. 2020-09, Exhibit A supervised by management to ensure social distancing guidelines are being met. B. Management shall keep the outdoor area clear of litter and food scraps. C. Management shall be responsible for maintaining noise volumes at reasonable levels. D. At the end of each business day, establishments are required to clean (sweep and wash) the area in and around the outdoor area and remove the debris to a closed receptacle. No debris shall be swept, washed, or blown into the sidewalk, gutter or street in conformance with the City's NPDES regulations. E. Upon termination of the outdoor commercial use, the business owner shall immediately remove the barriers around the outdoor area, return the sidewalk to its original condition, and remove all personal property, furnishings, and equipment from the sidewalk. Any personal property remaining on the premises shall be removed pursuant to the laws of the State of California. F. The allowable hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 6 p.m. 7 days a week. G. Amplified entertainment shall be strictly prohibited in outdoor commercial areas. At no time may noise levels of activities conducted in the designated outdoor areas constitute a nuisance or violate the Noise Control Ordinance in Chapter 8.24. H. Outdoor areas for fitness uses are limited to hand-held fitness equipment. Large fitness equipment such as but limited to squat racks and fitness tires are prohibited. Weight dropping shall be strictly prohibited. I. The outdoor area shall not adversely affect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. VI. ENFORCEMENT A. Notice of violation of the outdoor commercial use design standards or standards of operation shall be made in writing to the business owner by any Code Enforcement Officer, Public Works Inspector, Building Inspector, Police Department Official, or Fire Department Official of the City. A copy of the notice shall be filed with the Public Works Director. The business owner shall immediately cure the violation 466 Executive Order No. 2020-09, Exhibit A upon receipt of notice. If the violation is not cured within ten (10) days after issuance of the notice to the business owner, the Director may suspend or revoke the Encroachment Permit. B. In the case of non-compliance with conditions of approval, substantial difficulties resulting from the operation of the outdoor area, or other unforeseen problems with the operation of the outdoor area, the Community Development Director has the right to reevaluate the business owners by-right operation of the outdoor area; and, if the outdoor area has created neighborhood, Police or Code Enforcement problems, continued operations of the outdoor area may be prohibited. 467 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ORDINANCE NO. 20-1415U AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TEMPORARILY SUSPENDING LOCAL ZONING TO PERMIT SPECIFIED BUSINESSES TO OPERATE OUTDOORS, PERMIT CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS TO OPERATE WITHOUT A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOCATION AND REQUIRE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO WEAR A FACE COVERING DURING THE COVID-19 CRISIS, AND SETTING FORTH THE FACTS CONSTITUTING SUCH URGENCY The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. A. On March 15, 2020, City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) Mayor Mary Campbell declared a local emergency to ensure an effective City response to a respiratory disease which has been named “COVID-19.” At a special meeting on March 16, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 20-7230, approving and confirming the declaration of emergency. B. On March 19, 2020, the Governor of the State of California, issued Executive Order N- 33-20, an Order of the State Public Health Officer ordering all individuals living in California to stay home or at their place of residence except as needed to maintain continuity of operations of outlined federal critical infrastructure sectors. C. Evidence in late April and early May demonstrated that state and local orders slowed the increase of community transfer of the disease by limiting interactions amongst people. As a result, on May 7, 2020, Governor Newsom, announced a four-staged framework, titled “Resilience Roadmap” that was intended to guide the state’s gradual modification of its Safer at Home Order to reopen California. The state also issued sector specific guidance to help specified businesses reopen under new restrictions, which require businesses to, among other things, implement social distancing measures. D. In line with the State’s health guidance, the Los Angeles County Public Health Officer issued a revised order on May 13, 2020 entitled “Continuation of Safer at Home Order that begins to move the County of Los Angeles into Stage 2 of the County’s Roadmap to Recovery,” that authorized some limited retail and outdoor recreation venues to reopen subject to among other things, social distancing measures to prevent the further spread of COVID-19. The Order was updated again on May 26th, May 29th, June 11th and June 18th, 2020 to continue to allow the gradual reopening of additional sectors including bars, hair salons, personal care services, gyms and fitness facilities subject to social distancing measures. E. The May 29th Order for example, permitted restaurants and food facilities to remain open and offer limited dine-in seating. The Order also encouraged restaurants to 468 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 expand outdoor seating where possible in compliance with local zoning codes to comply with social distancing requirements. F. On June 18, 2020, Governor Newsom along with the State Health Officer released mandatory health guidance that requires Californians, subject to limited exceptions to wear face coverings when outside the home. In line with the mandatory guidance, the Los Angeles County Health Officer issued a revised order on the same date to require all persons to wear a face covering over both the nose and mouth whenever they leave their place of residence and are or can be in contact with or walking near or past others who are non-household members in both public and private places whether indoors or outdoors. According to State and County Health officials, wearing face coverings reduces the risk of transmission to others who do not have symptoms and do not know that they’re infected. G. To assist in the economic recovery of local businesses and restaurants, on May 26, 2020, the City Manager issued Executive No. 2020-05 to temporarily suspend City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050 (B), (C) and 17.44.030 regarding off-street parking requirements for commercial and business uses. Many surrounding cities, including Los Angeles, Pasadena, and Long Beach also implemented similar rules and regulations to assist in the economic recovery of these businesses during the COVID-19 crisis. H. Since that time, the State and County have seen a sharp increase in confirmed COVID- 19 cases and hospitalizations, and the timing of these increases is in line with the reopening of “high risk” businesses where individuals may congregate with members who are not part of the same household and remove their face coverings to eat and drink. As a result, the County Health Officer issued a revised Order on July 1, 2020 to backtrack on the County’s gradual reopening to prohibit indoor dining and order the immediate closure of bars, wineries and winery tasting rooms. I. On July 13, 2020, the State Public Health Officer issued a state-wide order to require the immediate closure of: (1) indoor and outdoor operations of bars, pubs, brewpubs and breweries; and (2) indoor operation of restaurant dining, movie theatres, zoos, museums, cardrooms, wineries and tasting rooms. The order also imposes more stringent requirements on specified counties, including Los Angeles County that have appeared on the State’s Monitoring List for three consecutive days to order the immediate closure of indoor operations of the following sectors: gyms and fitness facilities, places of worship, indoor protests, offices for non-critical infrastructure sectors, personal care establishments, hair salons, barbershops, and malls. J. The following day, on July 14, 2020, the County Health Officer issued a revised Order to coincide with Governor’s July 13th Order and requiring the closure of indoor operations of the following establishments: malls, shopping centers, hair salons, barbershops, fitness facilities, and personal care establishments. K. Under the recent State and County Health Orders, local gyms, fitness centers, hair salons, barbershops, and personal care establishments that are unable to shift their operations outdoors have been forced to shut down for the second time during the 469 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 COVID-19 pandemic. Many of these businesses were struggling to financially recover following the first mandatory closure in March, and some may not be able to survive a second closure. This Order is intended to assist the economic recovery of these establishments and to permit them to continue to operate outdoors under State and County Health Orders by temporarily suspending local zoning regulations during the COVIID-19 crisis. L. California Business and Professions Code section 7317 requires that all barbershops, hair salons and cosmetology services including specified personal care services, must be performed in a licensed establishment. This Ordinance is further intended to permit the outdoor operation of these establishments as may be permitted by the State Board of Barbering and Cosmetology. M. On July 17, 2020, the City Manager issued Executive Order No. 2020-09 to temporarily suspend specified City of Hermosa Beach zoning regulations to permit gyms and fitness facilities to operate outdoors. The Order also permitted hair salons and barbershops to operate outdoors as permitted by the State Board of Barbering and Cosmetology. N. To assist in the safe outdoor operation of hair salons, barbershops, and personal care establishments, on July 20, 2020, Governor Newsom along with the State Health Officer released mandatory guidance on the safe outdoor operation of these establishments as permitted under its July 13th Order. Consistent with this updated State Guidance, the County Health Officer also updated its reopening protocol for personal care establishments, hair salons and barbershops in Appendices R and H of its order, respectively. O. As a result of State and County Stay-At-Home Orders, all non-essential office work spaces were ordered to close in an effort to slow the spread of COVID-19. City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code section 17.08.020(D)(14) prohibits professional offices in residential zones, that include but are not limited to: the healing arts, law, accounting, real estate, clergy, insurance and similar professional or semi-professional offices, unless the person engaged in such home occupation maintains a principal licensed office in an area permitting such activity as a principal use. Section 17.08.020(D)(14) clearly impedes on these businesses’ ability to continue their home occupations in light of State and County Stay-At-Home-Orders that have forced them to close their commercial office spaces. P. This Ordinance is necessary to supplement the City Manager’s Executive Order No. 2020-09, to (1) temporarily suspend City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050(B), 17.44.030, 17.38.550(B) and 17.08.020(D)(14) regarding uses permitted within commercial zones, off-street parking requirements for commercial and business use, and home occupation permits to the extent they conflict with this Ordinance. Q. This Ordinance also adopts additional measures to require members of the public to wear face coverings whenever they leave their place of residence. 470 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 R. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Government Code section 36937, for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety of residents living within the City, and finds urgency to approve this Ordinance immediately based on the facts described herein and detailed in the staff report. SECTION 2. The provisions of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.26.050 (B), 17.44.030, 17.38.550(B) and 17.08.020(D)(14) regarding uses permitted within commercial zones, off-street parking requirements for commercial and business uses within commercial zones, and home occupation permits are hereby temporarily suspended, to the extent they conflict with this Ordinance, to allow for the implementation of items A and B below on a temporary basis during the term of the City, State and Los Angeles County COVID-19 emergency orders: A. Gyms, fitness centers, hair salons, barbershops and personal care establishments (to the extent permitted by the State Board of Barbering and Cosmetology) may operate outdoors to assist in their economic recovery in accordance with the “Outdoor Commercial Uses Operational Standards” attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. B. Consistent with the Los Angeles County Health Officer Reopening Protocol for Personal Care Establishment in Appendix R, “personal care services” shall include: nail salons, tanning salons, esthetician, skin care, cosmetology services and massage therapy (in a non-healthcare setting). Electrology, tattooing, microblading, permanent make-up and piercing may not operate outdoors because they are invasive procedures that require a controlled hygienic environment to be performed safely. Mobile or in- home personal care services are not allowed. C. Professional offices, including but not limited to the healing arts, law, accounting, real estate, clergy, insurance and similar professional or semiprofessional offices may render their services from their residence with a home occupation permit regardless if they comply with Municipal Code section 17.08.020(D)(14), to allow them to continue to operate and pursue their livelihoods while complying with California and Los Angeles County Health orders in response to COVID-19. SECTION 3. The following emergency measures are adopted: A. All persons shall wear a face covering over both the nose and mouth whenever they leave their place of residence, except for: a. Persons younger than two years old; b. Persons who have been instructed by a medical provider not to wear a face covering due to a medical condition, mental health condition, or disability that prevents wearing a face covering; c. Persons who are hearing impaired, or communicating with a person who is hearing impaired, where the ability to see the mouth is essential for communication; d. Persons who are swimming or engaged in other water-based activities; and 471 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 e. Healthcare workers, first responders, and others whose work requires close contact with people who are ill. B. For purposes of this Ordinance, “face covering” shall mean: fabric coverings, such as cloth masks, scarves, bandanas, tightly woven fabric such as cotton t-shirt, and some types of towels that cover the nose and mouth. Medical-grade masks and N-95 respirators are not required. C. Persons who are seated at a restaurant or other establishment that offers food or beverage service shall wear a cloth face covering over both the nose and mouth unless they are eating or drinking. D. With respect to persons on the beach, this Ordinance supersedes Section 2(c)(ii) of City Manager Executive Order No. 2020-06. SECTION 4. In addition to enforcement remedies available to the City as provided in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, emergency executive orders issued by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services and confirmed by City Council, and emergency ordinances, orders and resolutions adopted by the City Council shall be enforceable by way of: A. Imposing an administrative citation pursuant to HBMC Chapter 1.10. B. Prosecuting a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not to exceed one thousand ($1,000) dollars or by imprisonment for not to exceed six months, or both. SECTION 5 Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance is found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 6 Environmental Review. The City Council finds that adoption and implementation of this ordinance is not a “project” for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as that term is defined by CEQA guidelines (Guidelines) sections 15061(b)(3), and 15378(b)(5). The effect of the proposed amendment will be to maintain the status quo. No new development will result from the proposed action. No impact to the physical environment will result. The City Council also alternatively finds that the adoption and implementation of this ordinance is exempt from the provisions of CEQA as an administrative activity by the City of Hermosa Beach, in furtherance of its police power, that will not result in any direct or indirect physical change in the environment, per sections 15061(b)(3), and 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA , Guidelines, as well as CEQA Guidelines section 15064(e) (economic regulations). SECTION 7 Urgency Declaration; Effective Date. The City Council finds and declares that the adoption and implementation of this Ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation and protection of the public peace, health and safety as detailed above by the City, pursuant to Government Code section 36937. As a result of State and County stay at home orders, local gyms, fitness facilities, hair salons and barbershops were forced to close. The rapid, 472 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 immediate and unexpected loss of revenue following the first wave of mandatory closures was devastating to these local businesses. Many of these businesses are still struggling to financially recover, and some may not be able to survive a second closure. Additionally, home occupations that render certain professional services, are unable to pursue their livelihoods while complying with local zoning regulations and State and County health orders. The recent increase in confirmed cases and hospitalizations demonstrates how easily and rapidly the disease can spread form person-to person. By requiring members of the public to wear face coverings while outside of their places of residence helps reduce the risk of community transfer of the disease. This Ordinance is intended to assist the economic recovery of these establishments and to permit them to continue to operate under State and County health orders by temporarily suspending specified local zoning regulations during the COVIID-19 crisis. This Ordinance is also conducive to the public health because it requires businesses to follow the directives of State and County public health officials to prevent the further spread of the disease. This Ordinance must be passed by four-fifths of the City Council and shall take effect immediately after passage. SECTION 8. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be published or posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __th day of July, 2020. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________ ___ Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Michael Jenkins, City Attorney 473 Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "noreply@granicusideas.com" <noreply@granicusideas.com> Date: July 25, 2020 at 5:35:15 PM PDT To: Leeanne Singleton <lsingleton@hermosabeach.gov>, City Council <citycouncil@hermosabeach.gov>, Suja Lowenthal <suja@hermosabeach.gov> Subject: New eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M.=0ARegular Meeting - 6:00 P.M.=0ADuly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting -Closed Session - 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - 6:00P.M. Duly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m.By E.S. Carolyn Petty submitted a new eComment. Meeting: City Council Virtual Meeting - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - 6:00 P.M. Duly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. Item: a) REPORT 20-0480 C 42 #9- CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR A MURAL DISPLAY MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 3,376 SQUARE FEET ON THE WEST FACING BUILDING WALL OF THE HISTORIC BIJOU BUILDING LOCATED AT 1221 HERMOSA AVENUE AND DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15301 AND 15061(B)(3) UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (Community Development Director Ken Robertson) eComment: Item 6a is an outrage - forcing people to wear masks even if they are walking alone or walking with a family member down the street? Did you learn nothing from what is now happening in Manhattan Beach? Their residents are outraged by the MB city council 474 weaponizing the police department against its own residents. Now the MB City Council is backpedaling because they should have never instituted a policy as onerous as this. For you to do the same is a complete affront to the people who elected you. We all understand the guidelines as it relates to indoors. But to come up with something as onerous such as this for outdoors is ridiculous. People have no problem socially distancing walking down the street. Between this and the proposal by the City Manager to remove the volleyball posts, you are walking a precarious line with our community. You are elected representatives, but you were not elected to turn into dictators who seek to control our every movement. View and Analyze eComments This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com. Unsubscribe from future mailings 475 From:Ann Yang To:Eduardo Sarmiento Subject:FW: New eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M.=0ARegular Meeting - 6:00 P.M.=0ADuly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. Date:Tuesday, July 28, 2020 3:27:32 PM From: noreply@granicusideas.com <noreply@granicusideas.com> Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 10:10 AM To: Leeanne Singleton <lsingleton@hermosabeach.gov>; City Council <citycouncil@hermosabeach.gov>; Suja Lowenthal <suja@hermosabeach.gov> Subject: New eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M.=0ARegular Meeting - 6:00 P.M.=0ADuly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting -Closed Session - 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - 6:00P.M. Duly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m.By E.S. Patti Nernberg submitted a new eComment. Meeting: City Council Virtual Meeting - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - 6:00 P.M. Duly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. Item: a) REPORT 20-0484 ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, THAT REQUIRES MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO WEAR FACE COVERINGS; AND TO CONFIRM CITY MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 2020-09 REGARDING SUSPENDING LOCAL ZONING REGULATIONS TO PERMIT SPECIFIED BUSINESSES TO OPERATE OUTDOORS AND TO PERMIT CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS TO OPERATE WITHOUT A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOCATION DURING THE COVID-19 CRISIS (City Attorney Michael Jenkins) eComment: Mask covering on public walkways. Outdoor party’s, large gathers of 10 or more Mask requirements. fines implications. Educating or start fining the young adults who don’t comply with social distancing or wearing a mask View and Analyze eComments This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com. 476 Unsubscribe from future mailings 477 From: noreply@granicusideas.com <noreply@granicusideas.com> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 7:45 AM To: Leeanne Singleton <lsingleton@hermosabeach.gov>; City Council <citycouncil@hermosabeach.gov>; Suja Lowenthal <suja@hermosabeach.gov> Subject: New eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M.=0ARegular Meeting - 6:00 P.M.=0ADuly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting -Closed Session - 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - 6:00P.M. Duly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m.By E.S. Jeanie Alessandrini submitted a new eComment. Meeting: City Council Virtual Meeting - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - 6:00 P.M. Duly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. Item: a) REPORT 20-0484 ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, THAT REQUIRES MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO WEAR FACE COVERINGS; AND TO CONFIRM CITY MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 2020-09 REGARDING SUSPENDING LOCAL ZONING REGULATIONS TO PERMIT SPECIFIED BUSINESSES TO OPERATE OUTDOORS AND TO PERMIT CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS TO OPERATE WITHOUT A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOCATION DURING THE COVID-19 CRISIS (City Attorney Michael Jenkins) eComment: I live and work in Hermosa.I’ve not worn a mask due to hearing and breathing impairments. I can’t understand what people are saying as I rely on reading lips. I can’t afford the irreparable lung damage. Now I have to tell people of my disability. Why should I be made to be embarrassed? I’m not near anyone except if I have to shop for food. Nobody I know is sick with even a cold. I’m not infected and have no fear of being infected. I make all my own food. How can you eat out if there is a pandemic? Unless all of the restaurant workers are able to prove the cleanliness and where abouts, you cant be sure. So how is this considered safe, but me walking alone with nobody near requires me to suffer physically and emotionally? My body my choice. View and Analyze eComments 478 This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com. Unsubscribe from future mailings 479 1007 Hermosa Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 www.hbchamber.net 310-376-0951 July 28, 2020 Dear Hermosa Beach City Council and City Manager, On behalf of the members of the Executive Board of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, we would like you consider the following during your next council meeting on Tuesday, July 28, 2020: 1. Parking & Opening of Parking Structure – With the increase in restaurants and shops being opened in the day and evening, and with the new outdoor dining options, we suggest Parking Structure C be fully functional, 24-hours a day. This is to include current employees/ pass holders and visitors to Hermosa Beach. We understand there was a concern about social distancing in the Elevator, and we suggest what many (most) businesses in our city and Manhattan Beach have done: Signage recommending one party at a time in the elevators to adhere to social distancing, encouragement of steps and masks to be worn at all times. 2. Item 6(a) Wearing Facial Coverings – The Governor has requested all wear facial coverings to help stop the spread of COVID-19, at all times in public. We agree, believe in the facial coverings, but do not endorse our City to be unfriendly to businesses with automatic ticketing to those not in compliance. In addition, our (unaudited) review of people in the streets, is that we have seen most being compliant. Rather than fines, we suggest warning tickets at this time, with a strong message that all should be wearing Masks and following the Governor of California’s guideline to include social distancing and the Face coverings. We believe that will be more effective, than harsh fines. We encourage all to shop local, stay local and eat local --- especially during the Pandemic. This will help all our Hermosa Beach Business Community members to stay in business and vibrant for all residents and guests to our great beach city. Thank you for your consideration. Marje Bennetts Marje Bennetts Chairperson Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce & Visitor’s Bureau 480 From:Ann Yang To:Eduardo Sarmiento Subject:FW: New eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting 5:00 PM - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M.=0ARegular Meeting - 6:00 P.M.=0ADuly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. Date:Tuesday, July 28, 2020 3:27:59 PM From: noreply@granicusideas.com <noreply@granicusideas.com> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 3:37 PM To: Leeanne Singleton <lsingleton@hermosabeach.gov>; City Council <citycouncil@hermosabeach.gov>; Suja Lowenthal <suja@hermosabeach.gov> Subject: New eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting 5:00 PM - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M.=0ARegular Meeting - 6:00 P.M.=0ADuly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting5:00 PM - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M. RegularMeeting - 6:00 P.M. Duly Posted Online July 24,2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. Resident Homeowner submitted a new eComment. Meeting: City Council Virtual Meeting 5:00 PM - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - 6:00 P.M. Duly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. Item: a) REPORT 20-0484 ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, THAT REQUIRES MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO WEAR FACE COVERINGS; AND TO CONFIRM CITY MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 2020-09 REGARDING SUSPENDING LOCAL ZONING REGULATIONS TO PERMIT SPECIFIED BUSINESSES TO OPERATE OUTDOORS AND TO PERMIT CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS TO OPERATE WITHOUT A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOCATION DURING THE COVID-19 CRISIS (City Attorney Michael Jenkins) eComment: This is a terrible idea and would only create more division within the community and loss of trust in this council. Lets focus on the more important issues that face our community - the transformation of our Beach town into Venice south. The increase in homeless and influx of transients sleeping on and in private property. The "sharrows" which are undoubtedly becoming more and more dangerous for the vehicles and the children who cross our streets. It's time that we stay focused on the real issues and stop creating new ones that do not need our attention. Masks are a heated topic and frankly the lawsuits are piling up in cities that attempt this - MB for example has seen its community split and the response has been luke warm at best (a bike ride through the city shows that this attempt was not taken seriously by the community). Lets 481 concentrate on the real problems and put forth real solutions to the long term issues. This temporary inconvenience will be gone soon enough yet the real issues need to be fixed. How are we addressing the Homeless? How are we address these dangerous bikers? How are we reopening the playgrounds for the kids, why are ours closed yet other cities are open? What is the plan for those action items? View and Analyze eComments This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com. Unsubscribe from future mailings 482 From: noreply@granicusideas.com <noreply@granicusideas.com> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 7:56 PM To: Leeanne Singleton <lsingleton@hermosabeach.gov>; City Council <citycouncil@hermosabeach.gov>; Suja Lowenthal <suja@hermosabeach.gov> Subject: New eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting 5:00 PM - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M.=0ARegular Meeting - 6:00 P.M.=0ADuly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting5:00 PM - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M. RegularMeeting - 6:00 P.M. Duly Posted Online July 24,2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. Jon David submitted a new eComment. Meeting: City Council Virtual Meeting 5:00 PM - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - 6:00 P.M. Duly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. Item: a) REPORT 20-0484 ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, THAT REQUIRES MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO WEAR FACE COVERINGS; AND TO CONFIRM CITY MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 2020-09 REGARDING SUSPENDING LOCAL ZONING REGULATIONS TO PERMIT SPECIFIED BUSINESSES TO OPERATE OUTDOORS AND TO PERMIT CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS TO OPERATE WITHOUT A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOCATION DURING THE COVID-19 CRISIS (City Attorney Michael Jenkins) eComment: I think a mask mandate may be needed, but suggest we see what happens between now and next week before making a decision to mandate masks. When we opened business up we certainly saw a rise in cases. I think people celebrated and forgot that virus is still with us. However, now with rising cases, people have received a healthy dose of reality and have modified their behaviors. I think this shows in our declining infections and positivity rates over the last week. Personally, I wear a mask almost every time I am outside. Half of the time this is not necessary because I am so isolated that it is not possible to spread the virus. I still make a choice to wear a mask at times when unnecessary because I am making a statement and trying to normalize wearing a mask. However, this is my choice, and I do not think it is right to make 483 people wear masks at times when there is no benefit in doing so. Lastly, if Council decided to move forward with the mask mandate, they should consider the regional differences within our city as it relates to potential to spread the virus. On that strand, it is hard to socially distance and many don’t where masks. On the beach, if socially isolated except with those in your household, there is no healthier place to be. So Council should consider the environment. View and Analyze eComments This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com. Unsubscribe from future mailings 484 From: Raymond Dussault <dussaultraymond@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 8:17 AM To: Suja Lowenthal <suja@hermosabeach.gov>; Ann Yang <anny@hermosabeach.gov>; City Council <citycouncil@hermosabeach.gov>; City Clerk <cityclerk@hermosabeach.gov> Subject: Please add to today's council agenda in a timely manner Dear Council & Staff. I am not anti-mask. I wanted that clear because it is common to jump to that conclusion when anyone raises objections to unnecessary fines and regulations. I regularly wear a mask when coming in contact with people in the public sphere out of respect for others. That said, this is a terrible idea coupled with an even more terribly written and vague staff report/recommendation. 1. New regulations should only be imposed when absolutely necessary. Voluntary mask compliance is common in Hermosa Beach and our case rates are far below the rest of the county. When outside near the beach, the science is very clear that the chance of transmission is minimal with or without masks. I've hear the council say they would follow the science so please do. See the link below for an NPR podcast with one of the most respected epidemiologists in the world. It's a good listen on many levels. Here's a quote: "Outdoors has its own natural air conditioning. I hear people complaining about people enjoying the beaches. Beaches are the safest places to go to unless you're cheek to jowl with someone for an extended period of time because of the air flow. The wind creates a kind of cleansing of the air." - Michael Osterholm, University of Minnesota Epidemiologist https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/assessing-covid-19-risk-as-the-u-s-reopens/id214089682? i=1000478382456&fbclid=IwAR0h5IAGZh7LziSVu1yVtwefmC_MlsEZBDxGp-eB39Kt2Vt0- SjLJ9W3HaM 2. Everytime we pass a new regulation we increase the frequency of the public's interaction with armed officers. In the very protests you have all supported, we can see the danger of increasing the public's interaction with armed officers. 3. The staff recommendation is poorly written and poorly thought out. By requiring masks "anytime we are outside of our homes" it would include when we are in the car and when exercising far distanced from other people. What would be the point in either one of those requirements? Do you really think that a single individual in their car driving creates a public risk justifying punitive regulations? Is it necessary to send armed officers out to stop a runner at 5AM when they are not coming in contact with anyone else AND the science has repeatedly determined that incidental contact is a minimal to nearly non-existent risk? 4. Please direct staff to separate recommendations that have little to do with one another in future proposed regulations. It is prima facie ridiculous to lump a resident mask regulation in with zoning changes to support businesses. It ends up confusing the public as well as wasting the valuable time of staff, council and the public. These types of confusing proposals divide the community and undermine your authority. Sincerely, Raymond Dussault 485 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/assessing-covid-19-risk-as-the-u-s-reopens/id214089682? i=1000478382456&fbclid=IwAR0h5IAGZh7LziSVu1yVtwefmC_MlsEZBDxGp-eB39Kt2Vt0- SjLJ9W3HaM 2.Everytime we pass a new regulation we increase the frequency of the public's interaction with armed officers. In the very protests you have all supported, we can see the danger of increasing the public's interaction with armed officers. 3.The staff recommendation is poorly written and poorly thought out. By requiring masks "anytime we are outside of our homes" it would include when we are in the car and when exercising far distanced from other people. What would be the point in either one of those requirements? Do you really think that a single individual in their car driving creates a public risk justifying punitive regulations? Is it necessary to send armed officers out to stop a runner at 5AM when they are not coming in contact with anyone else AND the science has repeatedly determined that incidental contact is a minimal to nearly non-existent risk? 4.Please direct staff to separate recommendations that have little to do with one another in future proposed regulations. It is prima facie ridiculous to lump a resident mask regulation in with zoning changes to support businesses. It ends up confusing the public as well as wasting the valuable time of staff, council and the public. These types of confusing proposals divide the community and undermine your authority. Sincerely, Raymond Dussault 486 From: Raymond Dussault <dussaultraymond@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 8:49 AM To: Ann Yang <anny@hermosabeach.gov>; Suja Lowenthal <suja@hermosabeach.gov>; City Council <citycouncil@hermosabeach.gov>; City Clerk <cityclerk@hermosabeach.gov> Subject: Please add to today's council agenda in a timely manner Dear Council and Staff Members. It took me two days of reading and re-reading to finally find the section on what staff's proposed punishment for the unmasked. In my other email, I included the reasons that this ordinance is unnecessary and outside all scientific evidence for the outdoors. But on top of that, the punishment proposed is borderline insane. It is out of all proportion to the behavior trying to be encouraged! $1,000, a criminal record (which could lead to job loss or restriction) and six months in jail? Please don't approve this unnecessary ordinance but also don't ruin people's entire lives over it if you choose to disregard the science. SECTION 4. In addition to enforcement remedies available to the City as provided in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, emergency executive orders issued by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services and confirmed by City Council, and emergency ordinances, orders and resolutions adopted by the City Council shall be enforceable by way of: A. Imposing an administrative citation pursuant to HBMC Chapter 1.10. B. Prosecuting a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not to exceed one thousand ($1,000) dollars or by imprisonment for not to exceed six months, or both. Raymond Dussault Please don't approve this unnecessary ordinance but also don't ruin people's entire lives over it if you choose to disregard the science. SECTION 4. In addition to enforcement remedies available to the City as provided in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, emergency executive orders issued by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services and confirmed by City Council, and emergency ordinances, orders and resolutions adopted by the City Council shall be enforceable by way of: A. Imposing an administrative citation pursuant to HBMC Chapter 1.10. B. Prosecuting a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not to exceed one thousand 487 ($1,000) dollars or by imprisonment for not to exceed six months, or both. Raymond Dussault 488 Start: July 28, 2020 Dear council and city manager. Re: executive order 2020-09 Please! What are you thinking??., You haven’t got a handle on masks or distancing. compliance. You haven’t got a handle on twice weekly Covid antigen testing with quick <24 hour test turn around meaning you can’t contact trace. You haven’t got a handle on the prohibition of group activities at beaches and parks. Group activities at parks and beaches are prohibited but they are ok on our sidewalks!!!??? How do you rationalize that. Getting your nails done or the latest hair-do is not a justification to put health care workers and vulnerable populations at risk. Put first things first. If for instance a hair stylist is asymptomatic how will you ever know she is a super spreaders until the damage is already done. It’s reckless to attract more visitors downtown under these conditions especially when we are right in the middle of a widespread surge in covid infections!!!!!!! You are throwing the health care workers who have to pick up the pieces and already under tremendous pressure physical and emotional pressure right under the bus. Bang your pots and pans to that!!! Celebrate health care workers by burying them in new infections. And because you haven’t finished the job of masks and distancing compliance, antigen testing, screening nor have you established a foundation for effective contact tracing; not only are you throwing health care workers under the bus but you are throwing vulnerable persons under that same bus. Nor has the city stopped group activities at beaches and parks. The environment is already unsafe for vulnerable populations and in the 6 months you have had to address these things you haven’t got it done; and until you do you have no business opening anything. It’s simply outrageous and totally irresponsible that you are reopening these businesses and bringing more people into the downtown area without attending to these matters first. What the hell are you thinking? Just kill em off and pretend it’s all ok? I’m sorry but someone getting their nails done is not a justification to put people into an unsafe uncontrolled downtown environment. Our city’s Covid response is in complete disarray!!! It’s simply not safe to bring more people downtown before these shortcomings have been fully handled. Anthony Higgins 489 490 From: Claudia Berman <its_42@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 12:13 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@hermosabeach.gov> Cc: Suja Lowenthal <suja@hermosabeach.gov>; Michael Jenkins <Michael.jenkins@bbklaw.com>; City Clerk <cityclerk@hermosabeach.gov> Subject: Comment on REPORT 20-0484 - Face Coverings Dear City Council, Per the staff report, the Los Angeles County health guidance states "In line with the mandatory guidance, the Los Angeles County Health Officer issued a revised Order on the same date to require all persons to wear a face covering whenever they leave their place of residence and are or can be in contact with or walking near or past others who are non-household members in both public and private places whether indoors or outdoors." The proposed Hermosa Beach ordinance states "All persons shall wear a face covering over both the nose and mouth whenever they leave their place of residence," In the Hermosa Beach ordinance, the phrase "and are or can be in contact with or walking near or past others who are non-household members" is left out, making the Hermosa Beach ordinance much stricter than county recommendations and does not allow for social distancing sans face covering. Questions: •Why is this stricter language being recommended? • What is the enforcement plan? •As a solitary walker for exercise, I bring my face covering with me at all times and have 491 it visible, but if there is no one in my vicinity I don't wear it. Will this behavior be cited? If I am alone at the beach is a face covering mandatory? Will this behavior be cited? When I take my trash to the curb and no one is near, will this behavior be cited? What happened to promoting the best way to avoid transmission is to social distance? If one household is visiting another household in the backyard and is keeping their social distance, are face coverings still required? Or is this ordinance just in the context of the public right of way and businesses? I think it's the later as the title states "members of the public", but it's confusing when mixed in with "whenever they leave their place of residence". I am all for enforcement of face coverings in outdoor congested areas and people in groups, but this seems to be a blanket order without allowing for social distancing. I think it would be prudent to require that a face covering be taken with you and be visible when you leave your residence, like people do with waste bags for their dogs. The dog may or may not poop, but the bag is handy and visible. Same principle. I would also support a blanket "face coverings are required" ordinance in the commercial zones as they attract more people. People are much more likely to pass the virus to their friends they are dining with as there is no enforcement of outdoor dinning across households. Every day I see new posts on my social media of friends in different households dining out sharing tables at our restaurants. Of course, this would be impossible to enforce, but we could do a better job stressing the importance of dinning at a table with just your household. Sincerely, Claudia Berman 492 From: noreply@granicusideas.com <noreply@granicusideas.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 12:30 PM To: Leeanne Singleton <lsingleton@hermosabeach.gov>; City Council <citycouncil@hermosabeach.gov>; Suja Lowenthal <suja@hermosabeach.gov> Subject: New eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M.=0ARegular Meeting - 6:00 P.M.=0ADuly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. SpeakUpNew eComment for City Council Virtual Meeting -Closed Session - 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - 6:00P.M. Duly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m.By E.S. Megg Sulzinger submitted a new eComment. Meeting: City Council Virtual Meeting - Closed Session - 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - 6:00 P.M. Duly Posted Online July 24, 2020 at 6:45 p.m. By E.S. Item: a) REPORT 20-0484 ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, THAT REQUIRES MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO WEAR FACE COVERINGS; AND TO CONFIRM CITY MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 2020-09 REGARDING SUSPENDING LOCAL ZONING REGULATIONS TO PERMIT SPECIFIED BUSINESSES TO OPERATE OUTDOORS AND TO PERMIT CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS TO OPERATE WITHOUT A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOCATION DURING THE COVID-19 CRISIS (City Attorney Michael Jenkins) eComment: Dear Council, It is extremely disappointing to see a mask mandate with a $1000 fine posted on the agenda. It is also disappointing that the staff recommended grouping this with this item TO CONFIRM CITY MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 2020-09 REGARDING SUSPENDING LOCAL ZONING REGULATIONS TO PERMIT SPECIFIED BUSINESSES TO OPERATE OUTDOORS AND TO PERMIT CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS TO OPERATE WITHOUT A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOCATION DURING THE COVID-19 CRISIS" which truly have nothing to do with each other. Please SEPARATE these 2 agenda items to they can be discussed on their own merit. Of course the council should support relaxing zoning regulations and helping businesses operate outside, this 493 should not be grouped with any decision to MANDATE face masks. As I'm sure you know our neighbors in MB have enacted this ordinance and it has been a complete disaster. How dare you in a time like this threaten residents with a fine so outrageous. Most people are being responsible, I have not ran into one person who has not had a mask on their person. However to require people on the beach, riding bikes and simply walking around socially distanced from each other to require masks all the time is way beyond necessary. Using masks while exercising could also cause a health risk and cause someone to lose their breath, pass out, etc. When this person loses consciousness because of your silly ordinance will you take it seriously then? The constant government overreach of this council during this time has been extremely sad to see. It is also disappointing that you think that our already understaffed police department has nothing better to do that run around town looking for people walking on the beach without a mask. Our police officers have dedicated their lives to protecting us and to basically limit them to mask regulators now is completely off base. To quote from The Beach Reporter on MB's "mask mandate". "Manhattan Beach is adding "common sense" language to it's new citywide mask requirement to avoid worst-case scenario ticketing as residents & some city council members say the rules are unclear" "The silver lining over the weekend, Abell said, is the most people at least had face coverings with them, even if not being worn when seen by an officer". "Some residents expressed concern during public comment to have seen CSC staff not distancing, improperly wearing masks and handling residents & visitors used pens" "Hadley was shocked, she said, to see the order required masks while playing singles tennis, on a walk with a member of one's household and in neighborhoods well beyond the city's commercial district. 'I understand we've made things simpler to enforce by making it so draconian', Hadley said, 'But I think we have gone overboard. I think the lack of common sense exemptions, she added, (like) 'for walking alone on a residential block when there's no one around, erodes respect for law enforcement." I'm not going to quote the entire article but I think you understand the concept, people have common sense. The council does not need to further place restrictions on residents that will surely backfire. The state says masks are required when you can't maintain social distance. So why again is the council trying to place even stricter enforcement on our city? Whether it's police, which is ridiculous that you make these highly trained long tenured officers to be meter maids or whether you are paying additional enforcement officers around town, which is my understanding we can't afford with our deficit, what is the purpose? Please learn from the mistakes of our neighbors, show respect for our community and stop treating us like children. We are certainly capable of following the rules & recommendations of the county/state without them being shoved down our throat with the threat of an extremely outrageous fine. Most people out of jobs right now. People can't afford food, rent, etc how on earth would they afford to pay this type of fine? In closing please separate the mask wearing agenda item from the zoning regulations agenda item as again they have nothing to do with each other and remember that we are adults who live here and we are capable of following the rules. Thank you. -Megg Sulzinger View and Analyze eComments This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com. Unsubscribe from future mailings 494 From: Dean Francois <savethestrand@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 2:33 PM To: Ann Yang <anny@hermosabeach.gov> Cc: City Clerk <cityclerk@hermosabeach.gov> Subject: item 6A mask and 2K easyreader add please receive file distribute for council meeting tonight 6A mask ordinance the staff report and summary is correct but the actual ordinance is inconsistent and needs to be slightly revised the governors order for wearing masks applied to those outside that are not more than 6 feet from others please revise the draft ordinance to make it consistent with the governors order and your own staff report. this is important in order to get public compliance. if one is running walking riding a bike outside on a cold dark day away from others one should not have to wear a mask. lets make sense here please 2K easy reader add funded by the city council this is a conflict of interest for you to fund such an add. we depend on an independent press that reports on you. the easy reader is able to survive like all private papers and are struggling just like the rest of us. their employees are given the same unemployment benefits as the rest of us the business is eligible for other assistance programs like others. do not single this one out. Dean Francois 1-310-938-2191 https://www.facebook.com/SaveHermosaPlaza/ 495 496 From: Carla Veltman <carlaveltman@msn.com> Date: July 28, 2020 at 4:23:41 PM PDT To: "hsfangary@gmail.com" <hsfangary@gmail.com> Subject: Council meeting comment re face coverings and Greenbelt Dear Hany A quick email to give the council a comment on the staff report regarding face coverings in response to your request as well for comment in your community first email. I fully support face coverings and wear them with a couple exceptions. My one year old yanks them off my face and so wearing them around kids is a challenge. Consequently I scrupulously abide by distance rules when outside and with my kids. We get no closer than 6 feet to anyone outside our family bubble when outside. Also it’s impossible to have my four year old wear one. He just chews on it. Allowances need to be made for kids. As well, I cannot wear one for a significant period when I run as I am asthmatic and can’t breathe so I wear a mask then I pull It up when I get anywhere within 15 feet of someone when running. I have read the county’s guidance on masks and believe my practice is consistent with those guidelines and a reasonable accommodation to practical concerns and safety. The staff report as written is ambiguous and seems to suggest the mask wearing outside the home is mandatory with no exceptions at least as I read it. I think there has to be clarity for people. And the current county guidelines regarding masks are consistent with WHO recommendations and should stay that way and be no more stringent than those. On a separate note on the Greenbelt infiltration project, I support dissolution of the MOU and pursuing feasibility studies for a new site commensurate with our cities’ contribution to the storm drain. Regards, Carla McCauley 497 498 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0462 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 RECEIVE REPORT ON EMERGENCY ENFORCEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH PANDEMIC-RELATED HEALTH ORDERS FROM BOTH THE CITY AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES HEALTH DEPARTMENT (City Manager Suja Lowenthal) (This report was published as a supplemental report in order to deliver the most current information available) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1.Receive the update on current enforcement efforts; and 2.Authorize the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services to contract with additional Code Enforcement and/or security personnel to supplement current efforts to ensure compliance with Los Angeles County Public Health Officer Orders,including the face covering mandate and limits on sporting activities on the beach and in parks. Executive Summary: Staff provided verbal updates at the last two City Council meetings regarding enforcement measures to ensure compliance with Health Officer Orders for restaurants and alcohol-servicing establishments.The following report broadens the update to include other enhanced monitoring and enforcement measures related to the pandemic that have proven challenging and may require additional resources to be successful. Background: Compliance with the local and County orders for wearing face coverings outdoors On June 18,2020,Governor Newsom and the State Public Health Officer issued a state-wide mandatory order requiring Californians to wear cloth face coverings.The Los Angeles County Public Health Officer issued a revised order on the same date to require mandatory face coverings when individuals leave their residence,and/or when one can be in contact with members outside of their household or cannot practice six feet of social distancing.“Face coverings,”as defined in the State and County orders are cloth masks,scarves,bandanas,tightly woven fabric such as cotton t-shirt, City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™499 Staff Report REPORT 20-0462 and County orders are cloth masks,scarves,bandanas,tightly woven fabric such as cotton t-shirt, and some types of towels that cover the nose and mouth. There are a few exemptions to wearing the face coverings: 1.Children younger than 2 years of age; 2.Persons who have been instructed by a medical provider not to wear a face covering due to a medical condition, mental health condition, or disability that prevents wearing a face covering; 3.Persons who are swimming or engaged in other water-based activities: and 4.Healthcare workers,first responders,and others whose work requires close contact with people who are ill. It is important to note that persons who are seated at a restaurant or other establishment that offers food or beverage service shall wear a cloth face covering over both the nose and mouth unless they are eating or drinking. The State and County Health Orders remain in effect.There is no anticipated date as to when the mandatory order to wear face coverings will be lifted. The Police Department,Community Development Department,and Community Resources Department continue to focus on areas of high concentration to encourage compliance with the County health order.Staff efforts emphasize education through personal interaction,the use of a public education campaign and distribution of masks to those who are not wearing one. Violations of the County mask ordinance continue to occur throughout Los Angeles County. Enforcement through citations is challenging due to other health and quality of life crimes being reported that require staff attention.Some jurisdictions have begun to utilize staffing models that provide additional part-time employees to focus exclusively on enforcement of the County’s mask ordinance. Compliance with restrictions on group sporting activities and gatherings on the beach and in parks The Police Department,Community Development Department,and Community Resources Department have utilized various strategies to address the egregious violations of the City and County health order regarding compliance with groups and sporting activities on the beach and in the parks.Staff met with key stakeholders to ensure understanding of the laws regarding group activities that are currently in place. Police Officers from the Police Department as well as Code Enforcement Officers from the Community Development Department have focused on the large groups that congregate and display disregard for social-distancing as well as encourage large group sports events.Police Department staff issued six citations over the weekend for alcohol-related violations involving large groups of people on the beach.Code Enforcement Officers from Community Development also issued twoCity of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™500 Staff Report REPORT 20-0462 people on the beach.Code Enforcement Officers from Community Development also issued two warning citations for organized sports in parks. Future enforcement strategies will include continued enforcement of egregious violations on the beach and in the parks.Ongoing communication with neighboring jurisdictions to ensure best practices and consistency in messaging will also continue. Compliance with City and County orders for safety and physical-distancing at restaurants and other businesses The Police Department and Community Development Department,through field operations,continue to monitor activities of businesses in Hermosa Beach regarding compliance with City and County pandemic-related orders,in addition to monitoring compliance with all applicable laws.As verbally reported at the last two Council meetings,recent efforts have focused on restaurant and alcohol- serving establishments and included the multi-jurisdictional approach on July 4 weekend where the County Health inspectors teamed up with Code Enforcement Officers and visited over 100 establishments. Code Enforcement, on a typical weekend, averages 100 site visits. Officers continue to emphasize education and assistance to ensure compliance with new and changing orders,with written warning notices as the next step.At this time,all warnings about compliance issues have been corrected in a timely manner,and no business has had multiple violations that have led to any citations being written.Officers are also tracking the number of contacts and warning citations,with the intent to issue a citation if a business has three or more violations. The most recent amended County health order requires non-essential businesses to cease indoor operations.Staff is in direct contact with personal care and gym and fitness businesses to help educate and assist as they seek opportunities to conduct their business activities outdoors. Fiscal Impact: Staff is currently looking into potential costs of contracting for code enforcement services.The City will be seeking reimbursement to cover pandemic-related enforcement costs including any additional contract enforcement costs. Respectfully Submitted by: Paul LeBaron, Police Chief Concur: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Concur: Brandy Villanueva, Emergency Management Coordinator Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™501 Staff Report REPORT 20-0462 City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™502 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0483 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING AND EXTENDING THE DURATION THE OF TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON FORECLOSURES AND RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL EVICTIONS FOR NONPAYMENT OF RENT DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC (City Attorney Michael Jenkins and Assistant City Attorney Lauren Langer) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an Urgency Ordinance No 20-1414U of the City of Hermosa Beach extending and amending the temporary moratorium on evictions during the COVID- 19 pandemic and setting forth the facts constituting such urgency. The Urgency Ordinance requires four-fifths vote of the City Council and if approved,will take effect immediately. Executive Summary: California has been in a declared State of Emergency since March 4,2020 in order to address the COVID-19 pandemic.On March 16,2020,the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach declared a state of local emergency in response to the COVID-19 global pandemic and imposed certain orders in response to the pandemic.One such order is the adoption of Urgency Ordinances temporarily suspending foreclosures and residential and commercial evictions for the nonpayment of rent resulting from COVID-19-related financial impacts through May 31,2020.This moratorium was recently extended to remain in effect through July 31,2020,allowing commercial and residential tenants to defer paying rent during the effective period due to financial impacts related to COVID-19 and also prohibits most residential evictions with exceptions for those evictions necessary to protect public health and safety. On June 30,2020,Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-71-20 extending the authorization for local governments to halt evictions of renters impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic through September 30,2020.Staff recommends that City Council extend the Hermosa Beach commercial and residential eviction and foreclosure moratorium urgency ordinance to prevent uncertainty and City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™503 Staff Report REPORT 20-0483 and residential eviction and foreclosure moratorium urgency ordinance to prevent uncertainty and confusion for residents associated with multiple state and county regulations governing evictions during the COVID-19 pandemic and to provide certainty for residents on the processes in place to repay deferred rent. Background: On March 4,2020,California Governor Gavin Newsom declared a State of Emergency to address the COVID-19 pandemic.On March 16,2020,the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach declared a state of local emergency in response to the COVID-19 global pandemic and imposed certain orders in response to the pandemic. On March 24 and April 14,2020,the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adopted Urgency Ordinances which temporarily suspended foreclosures and residential and commercial evictions for the nonpayment of rent resulting from COVID-19-related financial impacts through May 31,2020. This moratorium was recently extended to remain in effect through July 31,2020.The current moratorium allows commercial and residential tenants to defer paying rent during the effective period due to financial impacts related to COVID-19 and also prohibits most residential evictions with exceptions for those evictions necessary to protect public health and safety. On March 27,2020,Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-37-20,which provides a 60-day extension for tenants to respond to an eviction complaint based on nonpayment of rent.As another indicator of the critical need for residents to remain at home,this order expressly preserves local authority to enact any “public health measure that may compel an individual to remain physically present in any particular residential property.” Effective April 6,2020,the Judicial Council of California adopted emergency rules amending the California Rules of Court to effectively suspend all unlawful detainer (eviction)and foreclosure actions,unless necessary to protect public health and safety,until 90 days after the state’s declaration of emergency is lifted.If a tenant has already made an appearance in an eviction action, the court is ordered to delay trial for 60 days and continue any existing trial dates for 60 days unless an earlier date is necessary to protect public health and safety.At this point,the Governor has not stated when the state of emergency will be lifted so currently,it is unknown when courts will resume processing these cases. On May 13,2020,Los Angeles County Department of Health issued a new Safer at Home Order for Control of COVID-19,which extended the order for people to remain in their residences except for certain lower risk essential business and requires all persons to practice physical distancing of at least six feet apart and wear a cloth face covering whenever they will interact with the public.As COVID numbers began to surge in Los Angeles County,on July 4,2020,the Health Officer issued a revised order urging residents to remain in their homes as much as practicable. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™504 Staff Report REPORT 20-0483 Cases of COVID-19 continue to rise in Los Angeles County,with a sharp increase in the number of cases and hospitalizations as of June 28.In a 2-week span,the 7-day average rate of positive tests jumped from 5.8%to 9%.July 1 saw the fourth consecutive day of new cases over 2,000.As a result of this new surge in cases,Governor Newsom ordered all bars and nightclubs in LA County to close. LA County Department of Public Health attributes the sharp rise in cases to the reopening of bars and other areas where people congregate.As of July 21,2020,there were 161,673 confirmed cases and 4,154 deaths in the County.The County Public Health Department is urging residents to remain at home as much as possible and wear face coverings.Los Angeles County is on a statewide watch list,which is preventing schools from opening and cases continue to rise Accordingly,it is necessary to take all possible steps to allow residents to remain in their homes to comply with these orders.This is an ongoing crisis,and restrictions continue to evolve as public health officials learn more about the virus and how to contain its spread.The recitals and findings for the City’s urgency ordinances remain applicable here. The degree of the health and economic impact of the pandemic is unprecedented and unknown. Millions of people have filed for unemployment,and the City has a tremendous interest in preventing widespread homelessness and supporting the purposes behind safer-at-home directives issued by federal,state and county health authorities,especially since approximately 53.5%of the City’s population are renters. On June 30,2020,Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-71-20,which extended the authorization for local governments to halt evictions of renters impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic through September 30,2020.Consistent with the order,the proposed ordinance extends the moratorium period through September 30,2020,at which time the Council will consider whether further extensions are warranted.The ordinance also more clearly separates out the repayment period from the moratorium period.The eviction protections extend beyond the moratorium period provided the tenant is paying the deferred rent and current rent during the repayment period.During this period of extended moratorium,city staff will explore the need for further changes or revisions to the moratorium ordinances.As the epidemic proceeds for longer periods of time and certain economic sectors open,the City will need to reassess whether the same factors exist that warrant keeping the moratoria in place or whether its terms should be modified. The web of regulation is complicated,and this situation is unprecedented.The applicable rules continue to change and evolve,and we are monitoring the situation closely.Even if evictions are not being processed through the courts,the value of the City’s ordinance is the repayment protocols after the moratorium period.The practical reality of this situation is that financially impacted tenants will not be able to repay back rent the day the emergency order is lifted,and repayment provisions advance the stated purpose of the ordinance (and the state orders).Given all of the interests at play for both the landlord and tenants,the City may consider extending moratoria in the local ordinance.However, the City is still well-advised to proceed cautiously and slowly in its efforts to protect commercial andCity of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™505 Staff Report REPORT 20-0483 the City is still well-advised to proceed cautiously and slowly in its efforts to protect commercial and residential tenants and manage any risk associated with regulating evictions in the time of a global health pandemic. Staff will continue to assess the status of the local emergency and the efficacy of the ordinance in relationship to the state and county protections.This will allow the City to revise local regulations as necessary as federal, state and county regulations evolve. This is a complex and unprecedented area of the law,and the legal analysis underlying these ordinances should also be revisited periodically. Fiscal Impact: None at this time. Attachments: 1.Urgency Ordinance 20-1414U Extension Respectfully Submitted by: Michael Jenkins, City Attorney Legal Review: Lauren Langer, Assistant City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™506 ORDINANCE NO. 20-1414U AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXTENDING THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON EVICTIONS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND SETTING FORTH THE FACTS CONSTITUTING SUCH URGENCY The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. A. The findings set forth in Ordinance No. 20-1407U and 20-1409U are still applicable and incorporated herein by reference. B. On March 27, 2020 Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-37-20, which provides a 60-day extension for tenants to respond to an eviction complaint based on nonpayment of rent. As another indicator of the critical need for residents to remain at home, this order expressly preserves local authority to enact any public health measure that may compel an individual to remain physically present in any particular residential property. C. Effective April 6, 2020, the California Judicial Council approved temporary emergency rules, which suspends the processing of all eviction and foreclosure complaints until 90 days after the state’s emergency declaration is lifted, unless necessary to protect public health and safety. D. On May 13, 2020, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health issued a new Safer at Home Order for Control of COVID-19, which extended the order for people to remain in their residences except for essential business and requires all persons to practice physical distancing of at least six feet apart and wear a cloth face covering whenever they may have contact with people outside their household. On July 4, 2020, given the surge in COVID-19 cases in Los Angeles County, the Department issued a revised order urging residents to remain in their homes as much as practicable. The status of county and state health orders are still evolving daily. E. On June 30, 2020 Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-71-20 extending the authorization for local governments to halt evictions of renters impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic through September 30, 2020. F. The City Council desires to extend the Hermosa Beach commercial and residential eviction and foreclosure moratorium urgency ordinance to prevent uncertainty and confusion for residents associated with multiple state and county regulations governing evictions during the COVID-19 pandemic and to provide certainty for residents on the processes in place to repay deferred rent. G. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the City's police powers and powers afforded to the city in the time of a national, state, county and local emergency during an unprecedented health pandemic, such powers being afforded by the State Constitution, State law and 507 HBMC Chapter 2.56 to protect the peace, health, and safety of the public. The Hermosa Beach City Council finds that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety of residents living within the City and finds urgency to approve this ordinance immediately based on the facts described herein and detailed in the staff report. Under Government Code Section 8634, this ordinance is necessary to provide for the protection of health, life and property. SECTION 2. Paragraphs A, D, and F of Section 3 of Ordinance No. 20-1407U are amended to read as follows: A. During the moratorium period declared in response to COVID-19, no landlord shall endeavor to evict a tenant for nonpayment of rent if the tenant demonstrates that the tenant is unable to pay rent due to financial impacts related to COVID-19. The moratorium period is March 16, 2020 through September 30, 2020. D. This ordinance applies to nonpayment eviction notices and unlawful detainer actions based on such notices, served or filed during the moratorium period. F. Nothing in this ordinance shall relieve the tenant of liability for the unpaid rent, which the landlord may seek after expiration of the moratorium period and the tenant must repay within six months of the expiration of the moratorium period. A landlord may not charge or collect a late fee or interest for rent that is delayed for the reasons stated in this ordinance; nor may a landlord seek rent that is delayed for the reasons stated in this ordinance through the eviction process. A landlord shall not commence an eviction during the six months after the end of the moratorium period so long as the tenant pays rent in a timely manner after the moratorium period and is repaying the past due rent that accrued during the moratorium period. Nonpayment of rent in accordance with the terms of this ordinance shall not be grounds for eviction of a tenant even after expiration of the moratorium period. To the extent it applies, this ordinance is intended to be more restrictive than Civil Code Section 1946.2 by further limiting the reasons for termination of a residential tenancy during the six month repayment period. Landlords are strongly encouraged to offer payment plans to tenants after the moratorium period, which may go beyond the six month repayment period upon mutual written agreement of the parties. If mutually agreed upon in writing between the parties, Tenants may draw down on a security deposit during the repayment period to pay back rent and such security deposit shall be replenished by the end of the six month repayment period or longer. SECTION 3. Paragraphs A and D of Section 4 of Ordinance No. 20-1407U are amended to read as follows: A. During the moratorium period declared in response to COVID-19, no commercial landlord shall endeavor to evict a tenant for nonpayment of rent if the tenant demonstrates that the tenant’s businesses is subject to the Orders referenced in Section 1 above or is otherwise limited or closed (voluntarily or by mandate) to prevent or reduce the spread of COVID-19 and the tenant demonstrates lost income and inability to pay rent as a result of such limitation or closure or other 508 demonstrated financial impact related to COVID-19. The moratorium period is March 16, 2020 through September 30, 2020. D. Nothing in this ordinance shall relieve the tenant of liability for the unpaid rent, which the landlord may seek after the expiration of the moratorium period and the tenant must pay within six months of the expiration of the moratorium period. A landlord may not charge or collect a late fee or interest for rent that is delayed for the reasons stated in this ordinance; nor may a landlord seek rent that is delayed for the reasons stated in this ordinance, through the eviction process during or after the moratorium period. A landlord shall not commence an eviction during the six months after the end of the moratorium period for non-payment of rent, so long as the tenant pays rent in a timely manner after the moratorium period and is repaying the past due rent that accrued during the moratorium period. Nonpayment of rent in accordance with the terms of this ordinance shall not be grounds for eviction of a tenant even after expiration of the moratorium period. Landlords are strongly encouraged to offer payment plans to tenants after the period of local emergency, which may go beyond the six month repayment period upon mutual agreement of the parties. SECTION 4. Paragraph A of Section 5 of Ordinance 1407U is amended to read as follows: A. For mortgagors that are not eligible for financial relief under Governor Newsom’s Financial Relief Package found at: https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/03/25/governor-gavin-newsom- announces-major-financial-relief-package-90-day-mortgage-payment-relief-during-covid-19-crisis/, no foreclosure action against a property owner shall be initiated or proceed during the moratorium period in the City of Hermosa Beach for any mortgagor with a demonstrated financial impact related to COVID-19. Nothing in this ordinance shall relieve the mortgagor of liability for any unpaid mortgage payments, which the mortgagee may seek after expiration of the moratorium period and the mortgagor must pay within six months of the expiration of the moratorium period unless a different time is agreed to between the parties. A mortgagee may not charge or collect a late fee or penalty for payments that are delayed for the reasons stated in this ordinance. The respective rights and obligations of the parties in any foreclosure proceeding shall be adjudicated in the appropriate court of law with jurisdiction over the matter at the conclusion of the moratorium period or rescission of this ordinance. The moratorium period is March 16, 2020 through September 30, 2020. SECTION 5. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 1407U, which was further amended through Ordinance No. 1409U, is amended in its entirety to read as follows: In order to prevent inconsistencies, the Director of Emergency Services may suspend the effectiveness of any provision in this ordinance in the event that the President of the United States, Congress, Governor of the State of California or California State Legislature or other body with jurisdiction adopts an order or legislation that similarly prohibits evictions and foreclosures for failure to pay rent by individuals impacted by the COVID-19 crisis. SECTION 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance is found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not 509 affect the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 7. Environmental Review. The City Council finds that adoption and implementation of this ordinance is not a “project” for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as that term is defined by CEQA guidelines (Guidelines) sections 15061(b)(3), and 15378(b)(5). The effect of the proposed amendment will be to maintain the status quo and extend the existing urgency ordinance for an additional period of time. No new development will result from the proposed action. No impact to the physical environment will result. The City Council also alternatively finds that the adoption and implementation of this ordinance is exempt from the provisions of CEQA as an administrative activity by the City of Hermosa Beach, in furtherance of its police power, that will not result in any direct or indirect physical change in the environment, per sections 15061(b)(3), and 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, as well as CEQA Guidelines section 15064(e) (economic regulations). SECTION 8. Urgency Declaration; Effective Date. The City Council finds and declares that the adoption and implementation of this ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation and protection of the public peace, health and safety as detailed above and as the City and public would suffer potentially irreversible displacement of commercial and residential tenants resulting from evictions for failure to pay rent during the COVID-19 crisis. During this local emergency, and in the interest of protecting the public health and preventing transmission of COVID-19, it is essential to avoid unnecessary housing displacement, to protect the City’s affordable housing stock, and to prevent housed individuals from falling into homelessness during a time of abnormal economic conditions, especially given state and county directives to stay at home. Promoting stability amongst commercial tenancies is also conducive to public health, allowing businesses to follow the advice and directives of public health officials to close and allowing employees to avoid public contact during times of a public health crisis without fear of imminent eviction or foreclosure. Loss of income as a result of COVID-19 may inhibit City residents and businesses from fulfilling their financial obligations, including payment of rent. This ordinance is intended to provide certainty for tenants that they will not be forced from their homes during a pandemic and during the period of safer at home orders. The purpose of the ordinance is to prevent the spread of COVID-19, prevent homelessness and avoid displacement during safer at home orders. The length of the period of federal, state and local emergency is unknown at this time and it is prudent to revisit these emergency response measures as the unprecedented situation and legal landscape evolve. The Urgency Ordinances are already in place and these amendments to avoid residential and commercial displacement require immediate action. By extending the local eviction moratorium period through September 30, 2020, the City Council desires to prevent uncertainty and confusion for tenants associated with multiple state and county regulations governing evictions during the COVID-19 pandemic and to provide certainty for tenants on the processes in place to repay deferred rent after the initial period of moratorium. Under Government Code Section 8634 and HBMC Chapter 2.56, this ordinance is necessary to provide for the protection of life and property for the reasons set out herein. The Council therefore finds and determines that the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, and protection of life and property, require that this Ordinance be enacted as an urgency ordinance pursuant to Government Code section 36937 and take effect immediately upon adoption by four- 510 fifths of the City Council. SECTION 9. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be published or posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of July 2020. ____________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk (seal) Date: _______________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ City Attorney 511 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0472 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 REVIEW OF CITY’S PARKING ASSET RESTRICTIONS IN LIGHT OF ONGOING CHANGES TO THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY HEALTH ORDER (City Manager Suja Lowenthal) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council evaluate the current restrictions of the City’s downtown parking lots,and consider temporarily permitting individuals that have purchased annual business owner/employee permits the opportunity to park in the City’s downtown ‘Lot C’ parking structure. Executive Summary With recent changes to the County of Los Angeles’COVID-19 restrictions on business operations and access to public assets,this agenda item is an opportunity for members of the City Council to reassess the City’s existing parking restrictions for downtown parking lots and surrounding areas. Staff recommends Council discuss and provide direction to staff for the implementation of any modifications to enforcement and/or operations of the City’s downtown parking assets. Background: At City Council’s meeting on July 14,2020,City Council directed staff to reopen parking Lot C (the parking structure)for use by those that display a valid monthly parking permit.As of July 18,the City’s downtown parking assets are operating with the following restrictions: ·Parking Lot A is open for use by the general public for no more than 3-hours per day,and for use by those with monthly parking permits; ·Parking Lot B is open for use by the general public and for use by those with monthly parking permits; and ·Parking Lot C is reopened for use by those with monthly parking permits,but remains closed for use by the general public. Analysis: Per Council direction,the City’s ‘Lot C’parking structure was reopened for use by those with monthly permits and remains closed to the general public.The structure provides 300 public parking stalls City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™512 Staff Report REPORT 20-0472 permits and remains closed to the general public.The structure provides 300 public parking stalls and is equipped with multi-space meters.The structure is one of the three downtown lots that provides parking for employees of local businesses that have purchased monthly parking permits.To date,the City has sold 174 monthly parking permits for the month of July,and a total of 151 annual business owner/employee parking permits.Following the reopening of Lot C,City staff received an inquiry regarding the use of the annual business owner/employee parking permits in Lot C,and some anecdotal comments from those permit holders that they continue to find it difficult to find parking and are using on-street stalls that could be used by customers or residents. The monthly parking permits currently permitted in Lot C may only be used in Lots A,B,and C.There are two types of monthly permits available and they are priced based upon the hours of access: ·A 24-hour permit for $62 per month that allows the permit holder to park day and night,for up to 72-hours in one location. ·A day use permit for $31 per month that allows the permit holder to park during the hours of 5 a.m. - 7 p.m., daily. The annual business owner/employee parking permits are $143 per year and allow the permit holder to park in any location that an individual holding a residential parking permit may park on-street, namely yellow-posted meters and one-hour zones in residential areas,but not in any City lot.The annual business owner/employee parking permits are residential parking permits and,as such, Community Services Officer are unable to differentiate between the permit types.During the normal course of business,the inability to distinguish the two permit types is irrelevant during enforcement and helps the City streamline operations. Following Los Angeles County’s temporary closures over the July 4th weekend,activities on local beaches have been allowed to resume in a limited capacity,excluding large gatherings and organized sports.On July 1,2020,Appendix ‘I’of the County Health Order was updated to align with the Governor’s Order to prohibit indoor dining at all restaurants and food facilities.On July 3,2020, the County’s Order was further updated and included restrictions regarding all brewpubs,bars, breweries and wine-tasting facilities,and craft distilleries to remain closed for on-site beverage or food consumption until allowed by the County. On July 14,2020,the County Health Officer Order and corresponding appendices E,H,L,P and R were once again amended to align with the July 13,2020 Governor’s announcement to close the indoor operations of shopping centers,hair salons and barbershops,gyms and fitness establishments,and personal care establishments.The County order was amended along with Appendix T1 and T2 on July 18,2020 to ensure the order is in compliance with the Statewide Public Health Officer Order regarding schools which was release on July 17,2020.Additionally the July 18, City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™513 Staff Report REPORT 20-0472 2020 order updated Appendix J, N, and P. Considering the available capacity of Lot C,the number of monthly parking permits issued,the number of annual business owner/employee permits issued,and the concerns within the community regarding on-street parking availability,City Council may wish to consider expanding access to Lot C to those with annual business owner/employee permits.As a local comparison for Council’s consideration,the parking structure in the downtown core of the City of Manhattan Beach is currently open,and the parking structure at the City of Redondo Beach pier is open.Additionally,multiple beach lots throughout Los Angeles County have reopened with limited capacity. Any phased changes to downtown parking restrictions would directly impact businesses and patrons to the downtown;therefore,consideration must also be given to the City’s strategy for communicating these changes to the public. Previous Staff Reports: ·May 12, 2020 Council Report <https://hermosabeach.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx? ID=4523310&GUID=D59692CA-E6FB-4B8D-A83A-80C67D2D2C80> [Review of Downtown Asset Closures - Various] ·June 9, 2020 Council Report <https://hermosabeach.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx? ID=4555107&GUID=5185C6EC-F8DA-4846-A334-1922A21DB926> [Review of Downtown Parking Asset Restrictions] ·June 23, 2020 Council Report <https://hermosabeach.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx? ID=4577295&GUID=0C192C1C-9568-4E40-96B8-370CAE8C15BB> [Review of Parking Structure ‘Lot C’ Closure] ·July 1, 2020 Council Special Meeting Report <https://hermosabeach.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4582328&GUID=5242BC37- [Review of Downtown Assets and other Emergency Measures] ·July 14, 2020 Council Report <https://hermosabeach.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx? ID=4591294&GUID=FBC09242-DC78-4603-ABF4-7B5639DBF5FE> [Review of Lot C Closure and Downtown Parking Asset Restrictions] General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendations have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: Governance 1.6 Long-term considerations.Prioritize decisions that provide long-term community benefit and discourage decisions that provide short-term community benefit but reduce long-term opportunities. 2.6 Responsive to community needs.Continue to be responsive to community inquiries,providing public information and recording feedback from community interactions. 4.3 Collaboration with adjacent jurisdictions.Maintain strong collaborative relationships with City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™514 Staff Report REPORT 20-0472 adjacent jurisdictions and work together on projects of mutual interest and concern. Land Use 1.5 Balance resident and visitor needs.Ensure land uses and businesses provide for the needs of residents as well as visitors. Mobility 2.2 Encourage traffic calming.Encourage traffic calming policies and techniques to improve the safety and efficient movement of people and vehicles along residential areas and highly trafficked corridors. 7.1 Safe public right-of-ways.Encourage that all public right-of-ways are safe for all users at all times of day where users of all ages and ability feel comfortable participating in both motorized and non-motorized travel. Parks and Open Space 4.2 Enhanced access points.Increase and enhance access to parks and open space,particularly across major thoroughfares,as well as access points that promote physical activity such as pedestrian- and bike-oriented access points. 6.5 Wayfinding and coastal access.Maximize all forms of access and safety getting to and around the Coastal Zone through infrastructure and wayfinding improvements. Public Safety 4.7 Communicate risks.Regularly evaluate,identify,and communicate new hazard risks and incorporate into planning and programs. Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommendation at this time. Respectfully Submitted by: Assistant to the City Manager, Nico De Anda-Scaia Concur: Peter Ahlstrom, Community Services Division Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™515 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0426 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 APPROVE CONTRACT WITH UNITED STORM WATER INC. TO PURCHASE AND INSTALL STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN SCREEN DEVICES ON CITY AND COUNTY-OWNED STORM DRAINS FOR CIP 419 (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1.Find,based on the information contained in this report,that competitive bidding would not produce any advantage and waive the competitive bidding requirement otherwise required; 2.Authorize the Director of Public Works to execute a contract with United Storm Water,Inc.for installation of connector pipe screens on 192 catch basins for an amount not to exceed $88,563.00; 3.Authorize a 10% construction contingency of $8,856 for a total project budget of $97,419; 4.Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the Professional Services Agreement(s) subject to approval by the City Attorney; and 5.Authorize the Director of Public Works to file a Notice of Completion following final completion of the project. Executive Summary: To comply with deadlines outlined in the Santa Monica Bay Nearshore and Offshore Debris Total Maximum Daily Load (SMB Debris TMDL),the City of Hermosa Beach needs to install certified full trash capture devices in all of the City’s catch basins.The City installed connector pipe screens (CPS)on 123 catch basins in spring of 2019 as Phase 1 of this project.CIP 419 project would be Phase 2 and would utilize pricing discounts from Phase 1 to install CPS on all 192 remaining catch basins in the City.This would result in cost savings and help expedite this project to ensure the City’s compliance with State mandates for eliminating trash from storm water run-off. Background: The City of Hermosa Beach (City)lies entirely within the Santa Monica Bay Watershed and is subject to the Santa Monica Bay Nearshore and Offshore Debris Total Maximum Daily Load (SMB Debris TMDL).As outlined in the City’s approved Trash Monitoring and Reporting Plan (TMRP),the initial City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™516 Staff Report REPORT 20-0426 TMDL).As outlined in the City’s approved Trash Monitoring and Reporting Plan (TMRP),the initial implementation strategy to meet the interim and final compliance milestones in the SMB Debris TMDL was through the installation of certified full capture catch basin inserts on a phased schedule. The Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board)approved the City’s TMRP and directed the City to begin implementation of the TMRP in its Review of the Beach Cities Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Plan (CIMP) Letter dated May 22, 2015 (Attachment 1). The City began proactive implementation of full trash capture in 2012 by retrofitting 28 catch basins with certified full capture CPS and automatic retractable screens (ARS)tributary to the Hermosa Strand Infiltration Trench project located within the high-priority commercial area of the City. In October 2018,the City of Rancho Palos Verdes,with its partnering cities of Palos Verdes Estates and Rolling Hills Estates awarded a contract to United Storm Water,Inc.to install CPS in catch basins throughout their cities.United Storm Water was selected through a competitive bidding process and extended the same pricing to the cities of Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach (Attachment 2). Ordinarily, the City would need to comply with the competitive bidding requirements set forth in the California Public Contracts Code for this type of project.The purpose of such bidding requirements is to guard against favoritism, improvidence, extravagance, fraud and corruption,to prevent waste of public funds,and to obtain the best economic result for the public. The facts and circumstances of this project,however,demonstrate that competitive bids would not produce an advantage,and the advertisement for competitive bid would be undesirable and impractical for the following reasons:1)City is assured of having the best unit prices,which are being made available through the City of Rancho Palos Verdes’contract,which was a competitively bid; and 2) City is getting the units without general contractor markup. On February 12,2019,City Council waived the competitive bidding requirements and awarded the contract to United Storm Water for phase 1 of the project. Analysis: Staff requests that City Council once again waive the competitive bidding requirement and authorize the Director of Public Works to execute a contract with United Storm Water,Inc.for installation of 192 CPS for an amount not to exceed $88,563.00 for this final phase of the project (Attachment 3). United Storm Water successfully completed phase 1 of this project by installing 123 CPS for the City in spring of 2019.The company is familiar with Hermosa Beach and City staff and can expeditiously complete this final phase of installations.United Storm Water’s proposal reflects the same pricing from the 2019 installation along with additional costs to fund the permit fees from Los Angeles County Public Works (the County)for accessing and installing in County-owned basins.Upon completion of the project,the City of Hermosa Beach will enter into a maintenance agreement with the County to assume responsibility for maintenance of the catch basins outfitted with CPS.The County would inCity of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™517 Staff Report REPORT 20-0426 assume responsibility for maintenance of the catch basins outfitted with CPS.The County would in turn pay the City approximately $16 annually per basin for maintenance. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description February 12, 2019 City Council waived the competitive bidding requirements and awarded the contract to United Storm Water for phase 1 of the project. General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendations have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: Infrastructure Goal 5. The stormwater management system is safe, sanitary, and environmentally and fiscally sustainable. Policies: ·5.1 Integration of stormwater best practices.Integrate stormwater infiltration best practices when initiating streetscape redevelopment or public facility improvement projects. ·5.7 Stormwater permits. Strictly implement, enforce, and monitor MS4 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) Permit requirements through stormwater ordinances. ·5.9 Evaluate and retrofit. Evaluate existing systems and retrofit to meet current standards and infiltration best practices. Fiscal Impact: The recommended actions would result in a total authorized expenditure of an amount not to exceed $88,563 and 10% contingency for a total project budget of $97,419. Sufficient funding is available for CIP 419 Storm Drain Pipe Screens in the Storm Drain Fund. Attachments: 1.Water Resources Board Letter 2.City of Rancho Palos Verdes Bid Award 3.United Storm Water, Inc. Quote 4.Draft Contract with United Storm Water, Inc. Respectfully Submitted by: Romany Basilyous, Associate Engineer Concur: Douglas Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™518 Staff Report REPORT 20-0426 Concur: Lucho Rodriguez, Deputy City Engineer Concur: Marnell Gibson, Public Works Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™519 Water Boards Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board May 22, 2015 Beach Cities Watershed Management Group (See Distribution List) . EDMUND G . BROWN JR . GOVERNO R N,..~ M ATTHEW ROORIOU EZ l ............... ~ SEC RETARV f OR ~ ENVI RONMENTAl PROTEC110N REVIEW O F TH E B E ACH CIT IES WAT ERSH ED MANAG E M ENT GROUP COORDINATED IN TE G RATE D MO NI T ORING PRO GR AM, PUR SUAN T TO ATTACHM E NT E, PART IV.B OF THE LOS ANGEL ES COUNTY MUNIC I PA L SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYS TEM (MS4) PERMIT (NPD ES PERM IT NO. CAS 00 4 001; ORDER NO. R4-2 012-0175) Dear Permittees of the Beach Cities Watershed Management Group : The Regional Water Board has reviewed the draft monitoring program submitted on June 26, 2014 by the Beach Cities Watershed Management Group (Group). This monitoring program was submitted pursuant to the provisions of NPDES Permit No . CAS004001 (Order No. R4-2012- 0175), which authorizes discharges from the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) operated by 86 municipal Permittees within Los Angeles County (hereafter, LA County MS4 Permit). The LA County MS4 Permit allows Permittees the option to develop and implement a coordinated integ rated mon it oring program (CI MP) that ach ieves the five Primary Obj ect ives set forth in Part II. A of Attachment E and includes the elements set forth in Part II. E of Attachment E. These programs must be approved by the Executive Officer of the Regional Water Board . The Regional Water Board has reviewed the Group's draft CIM P and has determined that, for the most part, the CIMP includes the elements set forth in Part II.E of Attachment E and will achieve the Primary Objectives set forth in Part II.A of Attachment E of the LA County MS4 Permit. However, some additions and revisions to the CIMP are necessary. The Regional Water Board's comments on the draft CIMP , including detailed information concerning necessary additions and revisions to the CIMP, are found in Enclosure 1 and Enclosure 2 . Please make the necessary additions and revisions to the CI MP , as ident ified in the enclosures to this letter, and submit the revised CIMP as soon as possible and no later than July 6, 2015. The revised CIMP must be submitted to losangeles@waterboards .ca .gov w it h the subj ect li ne "LA County MS4 Permit -Revised Beach Cit ies Waters hed Mana g ement Gro up CIM P" w it h a copy to lvar.Ridgeway@waterboards .ca .gov and Erum .Razzak@waterboards .ca .gov . Upon approval of the revised CIM P by th e Executive Office r, the Group must prepare to commence its monitorin g prog ram w ith in 90 days. If the necessary revisions are not made, the Group mus t com ply with t he Mo nit or in g and Reporting Program and future revisions thereto, in Attachment E of the LA County MS4 Permi t. Until the Group 's CIMP is app ro ved by the Executive Officer, the monitoring requirements pursuant to Order No . 01-18 2 an d Monitoring and Reporting Program Cl 6948, and pursuant to approved TMDL monitoring plan s shall remain in effect. CllAAL[S STAl NG [R , CHAIR I S AMUEL U NGER, EXECUTIVE OFFICER 320 West 4th St ., Swte 200. Los Angeles, CA 90013 I www.wat erboards.ca.gov/losangeles c, Ht:C YC U :U PAt>I::U 520 Beach Cities Watershed Management Group Draft CIM P Review May 22, 2015 Page 2 of 2 If you have any questions, please contact Ms . Erum Razzak of the Storm Water Permitti ng Unit by electronic mail at Erum .Razzak@waterboards.ca.gov .or by phone at (213) 620-2095. Alternatively, you may also contact Mr. lvar Ridgeway, Chief of the Storm Water Permitting Unit, by electronic mail at lvar.Ridgeway@waterboards.ca .gov or by phone at (213) 620-2150 . Sincerely, ~~ u~.(?/\ Samuel Unger, P.E. Executive Officer Enclosures: Enclosure 1 -Summary of Comments and Required Revisions Enclosure 2 -Comments on Aquatic Toxicity Testing Beach Cities Watershed Management Group Distribution List 521 Water Boards . E DMUND G B ROWN J R GOVEAN OA ~ M ATTH EW R ODRIQUEZ "-.............._~ S ECAEIARY r OR ~ [tlVIROt.IUENIAI. PA O I£C TION Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board Enclosure 1 -Summary of Comments and Necessary Revisions to Draft CIMP Beach Cities Wate rshed Management Group MRP Element/ CJMP Reference Reference Comment and Necessary Revision (Attachment E) General Table 1 Provide a further breakdown of jurisdictional land use within each of the three HUC-12 areas in addition to the land use percentages by jurisdiction for the entire EWMP area . Table 2 Attachment N Please make the following corrections to Table 2 of the draft CIMP: PartE • Update table note 'a' with the effective date of July 2, 2014. Also, note that the compliance date of November 1, 2009 for attaining the winter dry weather WLAs was not altered in the revised TMDL. • Delete table note 'b' as the timeframes referenced in the note are not appli cable to the WLAs assigned to MS4 discharges, since those WLAs are based on existing MS4 discharge conditions. Therefore, the need for time to achieve pollutant load reductions is not anticipated . • Dominguez Channel (including Torrance Lateral): Correct Toxicity, Total Copper, Total Lead, and Total Zinc interim wet weath er compliance deadline from 3/23/2012 to 12/28/2012 (the effective date of the Order). • Dominguez Channel (including Torrance Lateral): Correct Total Lead effluent limitation (final wet weather) from 35.8 11g/L to 42 .7 11g/L per Table in Section E.3.b.i. • The City of Torrance is subject to TMD Ls for Dominguez Channel Estuary as per Attachment K, Table K-13 of the LA County MS4 Permit. As such, add Dominguez Channel Estuary and associated pollutants and compliance deadlines as set forth in Sections E.2 .b, E.3.c and E.3.d to the Category 1 Highest Priority pollutants. • Dominguez Channel (including Torrance Lateral): Add Total Cop per, Total Lead, and Total Zinc during dry weather conditions to Category 3 Medium Priority Pollu tan ts per footnotes 6 and 7 on p. N-6. • Change "N/A" in the Compliance Deadline column for Category 2 and Category 3 pollutants to "TBD in EWMP," 522 Summary of Comments and Necessary Revisions - 2 - Beach Cities Watershed Management Group Draft CIMP May 22, 2015 MRP Element / CIMP Reference Reference Comment and Necessary Revision (Attachm ent E) since the EWMP must specify interim milestones and final deadlines for achieving any necessary reductions in these pollutants in MS4 discharges. Table 4 Attachment N Note that In addition to Tables K-2 and K-4, Table K-13 also PartE (page identifies the specific waterbodies for which each MS4 Permittee N-5) within the Dominguez Channel and Greater LA and Long Beach Harbor Waters Watershed Management Area is assigned WLAs and associated monitoring requirements per the Taxies TMDL. Please make the following corrections to Table 4 ofthe draft CIMP: • Add Zinc for Torrance Carson Channel (Torrance Lateral) • Add Dominguez Channel Estuary (unlined portion below Vermont Ave.) and associated pollutants as in comment on Table 2, above. Section 11.1.1 Section 11.1.1 of the draft CIMP states that monitoring data will be submitted to MS4stormwaterRB4@waterboards.ca.gov. Please note that the aforementioned email address is no longer active. Instead, all monitoring data and/or other submissions should be sent to losangeles@waterboards.ca.gov with t he subject line "LA County MS4 Permit -Beach Cities WMG Monitoring Data." Sections 11.1.1 Attachment G The semi-annual analytical data submittal and the Integrated and 11.2 Part VIII (page Monitoring Compliance Report (IMCR) mentioned in the draft G-17 to G-18) CIMP must also include a summary of exceedances of municipal action levels (MAL) for stormwater outfall samples . Section 11.2 Attachment G Note that the IMCRs may serve as MAL Assessment Reports Part VIII provided that the IMCRs include an assessment of the stormwater outfall data as compared to MALs . Additionally, the IMCRs in conjunction with the EWMP may meet the requirement for a MAL Action Plan if the EWMP addresses the waterbody-pollutant combination(s) for which the MAL(s) was exceeded, or where the Group requests modifications to its EWMP to address the MAL exceed anc es . Appendix D Part VIII.C Appendix D Section D.2.1.4 of the draft CIMP states that grab Section D.2.1.4, (page E-23) samples will be collected during dry weather and compo site Sections 4.2 and samples will be collected during wet weather. Include the specific 12 procedure that will be used to collect composite samples during wet weather (i.e., number of aliquots, frequency of aliquot collection, and duration of sample collect ion ). Sections 4 .2 and 12 st ate that gra b sampling will be used for stormwater outfall sampli ng; this is inconsistent with Appendix D, Section D.2.1.4. Revise Sections 4.2 and 12, and other sections of 523 Summary of Comments and Necessary Revi sions -3- Beach Cities Watershed Management Group Draft CIMP May 22,2015 MRP Element/ CIMP Reference Reference Comment and Necessary Revision (Attachment E) the draft CIMP as necessary, to state that composite sampling will be conducted at stormwater outfall locations. Clarify that composite sampling will also be used at the existing receiving water mass emission station, S28, in Dominguez Channel. If composite sampling will not be used at the two SMB receiving water monitoring sites, provide justification for the use of grab samples at these two locations. Receiving Water Monitoring Section 2.3.1 In th is sec tion, the draft CIMP references a SMB Taxies TMDL, while elsewhere the TMDL is referenced as the SMB DOTs and PCBs TMDL. The latter title is the correct one and should be used throughout the CIMP for accuracy and consistency. Part VI.A.l.b.ii The revised CIMP must provide an explanation of how monitoring (page E-14) at the proposed receiving water stations RW-BCEG-1 and RW- BCEG-2 will provide representative measurement of the effects of the Group's MS4 discharges on Santa Monica Bay, given the proposed distance of the sites offshore. The Regional Water Board recommends that the Group considers locating these two receiving water sites closer to the shore where the impacts from the MS4 discharges if any, would be more detectable. Section 2.2.3 The draft CIMP in Section 2.2.3 states that to satisfy receiving water monitoring requirements for the SMBBB TMDL, eleven existing monitoring sites will continue to be monitored. Include in the revised CIMP, a presentation and evaluation of observational data from sites 0-06, 0 -07 and 0-08, shown in Figure· 7. On this basis of this evaluation, include weekly bacteriological monitoring at these sites, if the evaluation indicates significant non- stormwater discharges at any of these locations. Section 2.3.1 The draft CIMP proposes weekly monitoring at shoreline sites, SMB-6-3 and SMB-6 -4, and justifies this frequency on the basis of a year-round low flow diversion at SMB-6-3 and no MS4 discharge at SMB -6-4. This is acceptable. However, should conditions change at either of these sites such that there is a significant non-stormwater discharge from a MS4 then the sampling frequency must be re - evaluated. Section 2.2.3 The draft CIMP in Section 2.2.3 states that attainment of the Santa Monica Bay DOTs and PCBs TMDL (SMB DDT & PCB TMDL) will be addressed through the stormwater outfall monitoring to assess the sediment borne loading of DDT and PCBs from the MS4 to SMB. This is an appropriate approach. However, as indicated in Section 4.2 and Table 8, the Group proposes to monitor the four 524 Summary of Comments and Necessary Rev isions -4- Beach Cities Watershed Management Group Draft CIMP May 22, 201 5 MRP Elem e nt/ CIMP Reference Reference Comment and Necessary Revision (Attac hment E) stormwater outfall sites in the SM B Watershed Man agement Area (WMA} in alternating years such tha t no one ou t f all site will be monitored every year within the SMB WMA. Given that compliance with the WLAs for DDT and PCBs is determined based on a three-year average, describe how the data from alternating sites will be adequate to assess compliance with these WLAs. The draft CIMP also states in Section 2.3.1 that the two SMB receiving water sites have been selected as the monitoring sites for the SMB DDT and PCBs TMDL and that three wet-weather sampling events will be conducted to evaluate the annual WLA of DDT and PCB for the Group. This sampling is not necessary. The TMDL monitoring requirements can be adequately fulfilled by stormwater outfall monitori ng . Section 2.3.2 The draft CIMP establishes the thresholds for wet weather sampling of the two SMB receiving water sites in Section 2.3.2. In this section, however, there is a caveat that the monitoring event will qualify as a wet weather event, "provided that sufficient sample volume is collected to do all required laboratory analysis." Since samples are being collected from Santa Monica Bay, collecting an adequate sample volume should not be problematic. Please delete this caveat. Part VI (page The revised CIMP should include receiving water monitoring at the E-13 to E-17} Torrance Lateral. Alternatively, the revised CIMP must include justification for not monitoring in Torrance Lateral. A receiving water station in the same location as outfall OF -BCEG -7 seems appropriate . The revised CIMP should indicate ifthe City ofTorrance is participating in the Coordinated Compliance & Reporting Plan for Greater Harbor Waters Regional Monitoring Coalition, dated February 26, 2014 for the Dominguez Channel Estuary as per the Dominguez Channel and Greater Harbors Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbor Waters Toxic Poll utants TMDL (Harbor Taxies TMDL). Table 6 Part VI.C.l.d The following is missing from Table 6 ofthe draft CIMP. Please (page E-15 to include the following: E-16} & • Mass Emissions station {S28}, all parameters that are VI.D.l.c (page applicable to S28 (e.g. field parameters, pollutants E-17} addressed by an applicable TMDL, 303(d) listed pollutants, toxicity, etc.), and monitoring frequency of 3 wet weather and 2 d ry wea th er events. • Total Suspended Solids (TSS} and Suspended-Sediment Concentration {SSC} for Dominguez Channel (b ec ause 525 Summary of Comments and Necessary Revisions -5- Beach Cities Watershed Management Group Draft CIMP May 22, 2015 MRP Element/ CIMP Reference Reference Comment and Necessary Revision (Attachment E) turbidity is on the 303(d) list for Dominguez Channel). Table 6 Part VI.C.1.e Table 6 of the revised CIMP should specify that Table E-2 (page E-16) parameters will be monitored during the first significant rain event of the storm year and during the critical dry weather event where dry weather sampling is conducted (i.e., S28) (preferably using a footnote). Table 6 Correct table note '1', which states "3/0 signifies three wet weather and two dry weather events per year." Fill in the field parameters that will be collected at ocean receiving water sites in table note '2'. Clarify table note '4', which states that future monitoring will be conducted at the frequency specified in the MRP (i.e., ... 3/2). The Regi ona l Water Board assumes that the Group proposes a sampling frequency of 3/0 for the two SMB receiving water sites and 3/2 for the Dominguez Channel receiving water site (S28). Section 2.3.3 Part VI.D The draft CIMP in Section 2.3.3 states that Low Flow Diversions (page E-16 to (LFDs) divert all dry-weather flows from the storm drains to the E-17) sanitary sewer system keeping dry-weather flows from reaching Santa Monica Bay . Therefore, no dry weather conditions are specified. However, the CIMP should specify dry weather conditions for other receiving water sites (e.g., S28) as per Attachment E Part VI.D of the LA County MS4 Permit. Appendix A In Appendix A Section 3.7, the draft CIMP states, "[a]s recognized Section 3.7 by the footnote in Attachment K-4 of the Permit, the County of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, and the cities of Redondo Beach, Torrance, and Manhattan Beach have entered into an Amended Consent Decree with the United States and the State of California, including the Regional Board, pursuant to which the Regional Board has released the County of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, and the cities of Redond o Beach , Torrance, and Manhattan Beach from responsibility for toxic pollutants in the Dominguez Channel and the Greater Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors." This statement misinterprets the Regional Water Board's findings. Footnote 1 to Table K-4 of the LA County MS4 Permit states, "[t]he requirements of this Order to implement the ob li gations of this TMDL do not apply to a Permittee to the extent that it is determined that th e Permi t t ee has been released from that obligation pursuant to the Amended Consent Decree entered in 526 Summary of Comments and Necessary Revisions -6- Beach Cities Watershed Management Group Draft CIMP May 22, 2015 MRP Element/ CIMP Reference Reference Comment and Necessary Revision (Attachment E) United States v. Montrose Chemical Corp ., Case No. 90-3122 AAH (JRx)." As stated in the responses to comments received on the Dominguez Channel and Greater Harbor Waters Toxic Pollutants TMDL, " ... primarily one pollutant, DDT, is associated with the Superfund site and also addressed by the TMDL. The TMDL addresses numerous pollutants and utilizes a different process than Superfund . The other pollutants -heavy metals, PAHs, PCBs and other legacy pesticides are not within Superfund's focus at the Montrose OU2 Site ... II Furthermore, the WQBELs in Attachment N, Part E of the LA County MS4 Permit are for ongoing discharges from the MS4, not for the historic contamination of the bed sediments . Therefore, the statement in the draft CIMP incorrectly concludes that the aforementioned Consent Decree releases MS4 Permittees from any obligation to implement the WQBELs in the MS4 permits. This statement in the CIMP must be revised consistent with the comment above. Appendix A In Appendix A Section A.1, the draft CIMP implies that the Group Section A.1 will provide monitoring support for the Harbor Toxics TMDL. However, the draft CIMP does not address the compliance method or the monitoring requirements such as water column, sediment, and fish tissue monitoring. As per the Harbor Toxics TMDL, the CIMP must include and/or incorporate all the elements of a technically appropriate Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MRP) and Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP). The CIMP must state that the Group will report compliance and non-compliance with waste load allocations (WLAs) as part of annual reports submitted to the Regional Water Board. In addition, the CIMP must include and/or incorporate elements of a QAPP which are protocols for sample collection, standard analytical procedures, and laboratory certification. All samples shall be collected in accordance with SWAMP protocols . For detailed requirements, refer to Basin Plan, Chapter 7, Section 7-40.1, "Monitoring Plan" (pages 22-24 of Attachment A of Resolution No. 11-008) Water and TSS samples shall be collected at the outlet of the storm drains discharging to Dominguez Channel, Dominguez Channel Estuary, and Torrance Lateral. Fish tissue and sediment samples should be collected in the receiving waters of the Dominguez Channel Estuary. 527 Summary of Comments and Necessary Revisions -7- Beach Cities Watershed Management Group Draft CIMP May 22,2015 MRP Element/ CIMP Reference Reference Comment and Necessary Revision (Attachme nt E) The cities of Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, and Torrance and the LACFCD are responsible for conducting water column monitoring, and the City ofTorrance and LACFCD are additionally responsible for conducting sediment and fish tissue monitoring in Dominguez Channel Estuary. However, the Regional Water Board encourages the Group to consider collaborating or coordinating their efforts with other responsible parties as identified in the Harbor Taxies TMDL and/or WMP/EWMP Groups such as the Dominguez Channel Watershed Mahagement Area Group to avoid duplication and reduce associated costs. Appendix A Attachment M Appendix A Table A-1 and Table A-2 ofthe CIMP are redundant. Table A-1 & A-2 Part A.3 (page Please remove one of the tables and reference the revised Santa M-1) Monica Bay Beaches Bacteria TMDL (July 2, 2014). Appendix A Attachment M Appendix A Table A-4 of the draft CIMP gives maximum allowable Table M -2 exceedance days during wet weather which are specified in (page M-8) Attachment M Table M-1 of the LA County MS4 Permit. Note that Attachment M Table M-2 and not Table M -1 of the LA County MS4 Permit is currently in effect. Therefore, as per the revised Santa Monica Bay Beaches Bacteria TMDL (July, 2, 2014), please include the maximum exceedance days beyond those allowed during wet weather as specified in Attachment M Table M - 2 of the LA County MS4 Permit. Appendix A Instead of listing all the effluent limitations for all the waterbodies Table A-16, A-19, covered by the Harbors Taxies TMDL, Appendix A Table A-16, A-19, &A-20 and A-20 should list only those effluent limitations for the waterbody that is applicable to the Group. Only Dominguez Channel Estuary in these tables is applicable to the Beach Cities Group. Appendix A Please make the following corrections to Appendix A Table A-5 and Table A-5 & A-6 A-6 of the draft CIMP: • Footnote 1 revision: Values in parentheses apply upon the effective date of the revised Santa Monica Bay Beaches Bacteria TMDL (July 2, 2014). Appendix A Attachment N In addition to the effluent limitations in Table A-15 of the draft Table A-15 Part E.3.a.ii, CIMP, note that samples collected from outfalls during flow footnote 6 conditions less than the 90th percentile of annual flow rates must (page N-6) demonstrate that the acute and chronic hardness dependent wate r quality cr iteria (for copper, lead and zinc) provid ed in the California Taxies Rule (CTR) are achieved (see Attachment N Part E.3.a.ii, footnotes 6 and 7 of the LA County M S4 Permit). 528 Summary of Comments and Necessary Revisions -8- Beach Cities Watershed Management Group Draft CIMP May 22,2015 MR P Element/ CIMP Reference Referenc e Comment and Necessary Revision (Attachm ent E) Appendix A Append ix A Table A-18 of the draft CIMP lists the sediment effluent Tab le A-18 limitation for Lead as 35.6 mg/kg. It should be corrected to 35.8 mg/kg. Appendix A Requirements for the Santa Monica Bay Nearshore and Offshore Section A.l.3 Debris TMDL (SMB Debris TMDL) can be satisfied through the submittal of the Trash Monitoring and Reporting Plan (TMRP) and Plastic Pellet Monitoring and Reporting Plan (PMRP) or via the CIMP. Appendix A Section A.l.3 notes which cities have submitted a TMRP, PMRP, and/or a demonstration that a PMRP is not required. Based on a preliminary review by Regional Board staff, please see comments below: Redondo Beach : • On page 12 of the TMRP, the Methodology proposes a 40- ft swath . However, on page 13 under Specific Procedures, the Site Definition section states that a 20 -foot section of the shoreline will be analyzed. The SWAMP Rapid Trash Assessment protocol calls for a 100-ft transect to be assessed. Please revise the TMRP to be consistent with the Rapid Trash Assessment protocol, and provide clarity. • In the PMRP, the map in Attachment B is unclear on the types of business/industries in the City. Please submit a list of corresponding SIC codes for these businesses. Torrance: • The SMB Debris TMDL lists an 80% reduction milestone in Year 7 (2019). However, the TMRP specifies that 77% of the WLA will be met for Year 7. The City of Torrance should implement additional and/or enhanced institutional controls to meet the 80% reduction in Year 7. • The City of Torrance submitted a request to the Regional Water Board to be exempt from the SMB Debris TMDL requirement to submit and implement a PMRP . The Regional Water Board has reviewed the documentation submitted, which included a spill response plan, and has determined that the City of Torrance does not have industrial facilities or activities related to the manufacturing, handling, or transportation of plastic pellets. Therefore, the City of Torrance is not required to monitor for plastic pellets, but will implement their spill response pl an if necessary. 529 Summary of Comments and Necessary Revisions -9- Beach Cities Watershed Management Group Draft CIMP May 22,2015 MRP Element/ CIMP Reference Reference Comment and Necessary Revision (Attachment E) Hermosa Beach: • As stated in the SMB Debris TMDL, if within three {3) years of Regional Board adoption date {November 4, 2010) of this TMDL, a city or county voluntarily adopts local ordinances to ban plastic bags, smoking in public places and single use expanded polystyrene food packaging, it shall receive a three-year extension of the final compliance date. As per the TMRP submitted, the City of Hermosa Beach adopted and implemented bans on smoking in public places and polystyrene food service ware prior to November 4, 2013. Since there was no plastic bag ban implemented prior to November 4, 2013, the City of Hermosa Beach does not qualify for a three-year extension of the final compliance date. Therefore, the final compliance date for the City of Hermosa Beach is March 20, 2020 {8 years from the effective date of the TMDL). • The Regional Board has reviewed the TMRP and directs the City of Hermosa Beach to begin the implementation of the TMRP immediately. • The City of Hermosa Beach submitted a request to the Regional Water Board to be exempt from the SMB Debris TMDL requirement to submit and implement a PMRP. The Regional Water Board has reviewed the documentation submitted, which included a spill response plan, and has determined that the City of Hermosa Beach does not have industrial facilities or activities related to the manufacturing, handling, or transportation of plastic pellets . Therefore, the City of Hermosa Beach is not required to monitor for plastic pellets, but will implement their spill response plan if necessary. Manhattan Beach: • As stated in the SMB Debris TMDL, if within three {3) years of Regional Board adoption date {November 4, 2010) of this TM DL, a city or county voluntarily adopts local ordinances to ban plastic bags, smoking in public places and single use expanded polystyrene food packaging, it shall receive a three-year extension of the final compliance date. Th e Ci t y of Manhattan Beach ad op te d and implemented bans on plastic bags, smoking in public pl aces, and poly styr ene f oo d serv ice ware prior to November 4, 2013, and therefore a three-year extension 530 Summary of Comments and Necessary Revisions -10- Beach Cities Watershed Management Group Draft CIMP May 22, 2015 MRP El e ment / CIMP Reference Reference Comment and Necessary Revision (Attachment E) of the final compliance date is appropriate. The new final compliance date for the City of Manhattan Beach is March 20,2023 (11 years f rom the effective date of the TMDL). Please revise the TMRP to include the polystyrene food service ban implementation. • The Regional Board has reviewed the TMRP and directs the City of Manhattan Beach to begin the implementation of the TMRP immediately. • The City of Manhattan Beach submitted a request to the Regional Water Board to be exempt from the SMB Debris TMDL requirement to submit and implement a PMRP. The Regional Water Board has reviewed the documentation submitted, which included a spill response plan, and has determined that the City of Manhattan Beach does not have industrial facilities or activities related to the manufacturing, handling, or transportation of plastic pellets. Therefore, the City of Manhattan Beach is not required to monitor for plastic pellets, but will implement their spill response plan if necessary. Storm Water Outfall Based Monitoring Section 4.2, Part VIII (page Section 4.2 of the draft CIMP states that the "default Permit Table 8, & E-21 to E-23) approach" of one site per HUC-12 per jurisdiction was chosen for Figures 7 and 8 the stormwater outfall-based monitoring. However, as per Section 4.2 and Table 8 of the draft CIMP, no outfall monitoring site has been selected within the Long Beach Harbor HUC-12 area (see Figure 4 and Table 8). Includ e justification for not including an outfall monitoring site for this HUC -12 area . Section 4 .2.6 Stormwater outfall monitoring site OF-BCEG-6, within the City of Redondo Beach, does not appear representative of either the land use distribution of the City of Redondo Beach or of the entire EWMP Group within the Lower Dominguez Channel HUC -12 area. Provide additional justification for the selection of this outfall location in the revised CIMP. Table 17 Part Table 17 ofthe revised CIMP should include monitoring for sse and VIII.B .l.c.iv monitoring for pollutants with WLAs assigned to discharges to (page E-23) Dominguez Channel Estuary . Section 3.0 Part VILA Section 3.0 of the draft CIMP references a GIS database that was submitted. However, the Regional Board has not received any GIS files from the Group. Please submit the referenced GIS files with the revised CIMP. Non-Storm Water Outfall Based Monitoring Section 5.2 Include a presentation and evaluation of observational data 531 Summary of Comments and Necessary Revisions -11- Beach Cities Watershed Management Group Draft CIMP May 22, 2015 MRP Element/ CIMP Reference Reference Comment and Necessary Revision (Attachment E) collected at shoreline sites under the SMB Bea ches Bacteria TMDL Coordinated Shoreline Monitoring Plan when identifying outfalls with significant non-stormwater d is charge. Observational sites within the Beach Cities EWMP area include 0 -06, 0-07, and 0-08, as shown in Figure 7. Section 2.3.3 & Part IX.H Sections 2.3.3 and 5.0 of the revised CIMP should specify the dry . 5.0 (Page E-28) weather conditions for non-stormwater outfall monitoring, where such monitoring is required. Furthermore, the revised CIMP must provide justification for use of grab samples instead of composite samples during dry weather. Section 5.2 Part IX.C.1 For the Dominguez Channel watershed, clarify in the revised CIMP (page E-24 to that the Machado Lake subwatershed will also be included as part E-25) of the non-stormwater outfall-based screening and monitoring program. Section 5.4 Part IX.E .1 & Section 5.4 of the draft CIMP notes that there is no prioritized IX.E.3 (page E-source identification at this point and that the Group will submit an 26) outfall prioritization process to the Regional Board at a later date. The revised CIMP should include a prioritized source identification process. Aquatic Toxicity Appendix D Part XII.G The draft CIMP is unclear on the method for toxicity testing . The Section D.1.3.2 .1 (page E-31 to revised CIMP should clearly specify that chronic toxicity testing will & D.1.3.2.2 E-32) be used for freshwater and saltwater species. 532 Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board Enclosure 2 -Comments on Aquatic Toxicity Testing Beach Cities Watershed Management Group . EDMUND G BROWN JR GOVERNOR ~ MATHH:.w RooR1 ouez "'-""-...._~ S~CR£.1ARY lOA ~ ENVIAON~ftlfAL PAOT(C l !Otl We note the CIMP is proposing to follow the toxicity testing procedures as described in the MRP and in order to assess compliance with the freshwater chronic toxicity numeric target in the Dominguez Channel and Greater Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbor Waters Toxics TMDL. Part Xll.l.1. (Page E-33) of the Monitoring and Reporting Program states that a toxicity test sample is immediately subject to TIE procedures if either survival or sublethal endpoints demonstrate a Percent Effect value equal to or greater than 50% at the lnstream Waste Concentration. The draft CIMP does not propose to perform a TIE when at least a 50% sublethal effect is seen but instead proposes to first collect a confirmatory sample two weeks later. This is not an acceptable approach . The CIMP seems to be implying that chronic toxicity has some inherent non -persistent quality to it that makes the results unreliable. It also implies that chronic toxicity is of lesser importance. Although it would be hard to generalize to all possible situations, the fact that a large number of invertebrates (or fish) living in a receiving water can survive an ambient pollutant concentration but are impacted in terms of growth or reproduction means that the population as a whole will be impacted, and could eventually collapse. Some species living in the receiving water have very short lifespans and during critical times of the year may be prey for other organisms that will in turn be impacted by their population decline . Sugg es t ed Spe cial Study: The 2013 study released by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) entitled "Review of Pyrethroid, Fipronil and Toxicity Monitoring Data from California Urban Watersheds" reviewed stormwater data from studies conducted during 2005-2012 and highlighted the toxicity impacts from use of pesticides not currently required to be monitored for by the MRP. We suggest the group begin monitoring for these chemicals in the receiving water and, in addition, assess toxicity using the 2002 acute toxicity testing protocol (EPA-821-R-02-012) with the amphipod Hyalella azteca as the test organism. H. azteca is known to be much more sensitive to pyrethroids than is Ceriod aphnia dubio while the latter is useful for its sensitivity to OP pesticides. The two species together may also prove to be more useful in detecting toxicity from fipronil. And, should 50% or greater effect be detected in the toxicity test, we suggest a procedure to incorporate pyrethroids into the subsequent TIE be documented (three possible treatments have been identified by researchers, see http://www.pubfacts.com/detaii/20018342/Focused -toxicity-identification -evaluations -to-rapidly - identify-the -cause -of-toxicity-in-environment ). W hil e fipron i l does not have a TIE procedure identified currently, chemical testing for th e parameter (and degradates ) and comparison to U.S. EPA Office of Pes ticid e Program 's aquatic li fe benc hmarks at http ://www.epa .gov/oppefedl/ecorisk ders/aquatic life benchmark .htm will aid in determining the 533 Comments on Aquatic Toxicity Testing -2 -March 27, 2015 Beach Cities Watershed Management Group Draft CIMP cause(s) of toxicity in order to follow up with outfall testing of the parameter(s) with the ultimate goal of removing the source. This approach will also help minimize inconclusive TIE results which would lead to required toxicity testing in the representative upstream outfall(s). 534 Beach Citi es Watershed Management Group -----.1 Name City Email Address Wisam Altowaiji Andrew Brozyna Raul Saenz John C. Dettle Gary Hildebrand Redondo Beach Hermosa Beach Manhattan Beach Torrance LACFCD wisam.a ltowaiji@redondo.o rg a brozyna@hermosabch.org rsaenz@citymb.i nfo jdettle@Torra nceCA .gov ghildeb@dpw.lacounty.gov 535 RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 10/02/2018 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Consideration and possible action to award a construction contract for the Santa Monica Bay Catch Basin Insert Project and appropriate funds to complete the project RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION: 1) Approve the specifications for the Santa Monica Bay Catch Basin Insert Project; 2) Award a construction contract to United Storm Water, Inc. in the amount of $744,943; 3) Authorize the City Manager or Director of Finance to execute contract for project contingency up to an additional 10% ($74,495) for project budget for a total construction authorization of $819,438; 4) Award a Professional Services Agreement to PSOMAS for Construction Management and Inspection Services in the amount of $226,680; 5) Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Construction and Professional Services Agreements; subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT: The recommended action will result in a total authorized expenditure of $1,046,118. Amount Budgeted: $1,012,200 Additional Appropriation: $33,918 Account Number(s): See table above ORIGINATED BY: Charles Eder, PE, Senior Engineer REVIEWED BY: Elias Sassoon, PE, Director of Public Works APPROVED BY: Doug Willmore, City Manager Contracts Amount United Storm Contract 744,943$ 10% Contingency 74,495$ Psomas Contract 226,680$ Total Contracts 1,046,118$ FY18-19 Budget Amount Account # Local Match - RPV, RHE, PVE 412,200$ 330-400-8709-8004 & 8807 Prop 84 600,000$ 332-400-8709-8807 Total Budget 1,012,200$ Additional Appropriation 33,918$ 330-400-8709-8807 1 536 ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: A. Construction agreement for United Storm Water, Inc. (page A-1) B. Professional Services Agreement for PSOMAS (page B-1) C. Memorandum of Understanding (page C-1) BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The City, with its partnering cities of Palos Verdes Estates (PVE) and Rolling Hills Estates (RHE), applied for and was awarded a Proposition 84 Grant from the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) for the Catch Basin Insert Project (Project) on December 19, 2016. The grant award is $600,000 with a combined estimated local match of $412,200 for total estimated project costs of $1,012,200. However, based on the proposed bid award the total project costs including the 10% contingency now totals $1,046,018. The additional appropriation of $33,918 will come from the Capital Improvement Fund reserves. Since 818 of the 1,368 catch basins covered by the project are located in the City, the City is responsible for 60% of the local match. The cities of PVE and RHE are responsible for the remaining 40%. PVE and RHE have agreed to contribute these additional matching funds under the terms of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the cities (Attachment C). The agreed-upon proportionate share of project costs stated in the MOU (Attachment C Table 2) were estimates and will be adjusted based on actual costs. Therefore, the City will recover 40% of the additional budget appropriation, if expended. The proposed Project involves installing 1,368 connector pipe screen (CPS) units in existing catch basins draining into Santa Monica Bay to implement the requirements for the 2012 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit. The CPS units capture debris and trash and prevent both from ending up in the bay. Construction Contract Competitive bids were opened for the project on September 13, 2018. After careful review of the bid documents, the apparent low bid by United Storm Water, Inc. was found to be a responsible bid. Santa Monica Bay Catch Basin Insert Project Contractor Base Bid Amount Additive Amount Total G2 Construction, Inc. 750,821.00 49,005.00 $799,826 Ocean Blue Environmental Services 799,331.50 60,086.50 $859,418 United Storm Water, Inc. 690,493.00 54,450.00 $744,943 2 537 Staff recommends awarding the construction contract to United Storm Water, Inc., in the amount of $744,943 plus 10% contingency for a total contract amount of $819,438. The construction agreement (Attachment A) has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s office. Construction Management and Inspection Contract Staff separately requested a proposal from a qualified consulting firm to conduct construction management and inspection oversight for the project. PSOMAS submitted the best-qualified proposal from a pool of consultants previously reviewed by the City. The consulting firm exhibited experience with very similar projects, for which they have provided professional, efficient and effective services. Their availability and variety of well-qualified staff was also key in their selection. Staff therefore recommends awarding the professional service agreement (Attachment B) to PSOMAS in the amount of $226,680. ALTERNATIVES: In addition to the Staff recommendations, the following alternative actions are available for the City Council’s consideration: 1. Reject all bids and direct Public Works to re-advertise the construction project. 3 538 01203.0006/507842.2 PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT By and Between CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES and UNITED STORM WATER, INC. A-1 539 -1- 01203.0006/507842.2 AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND UNITED STORM WATER, INC. THIS AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 2nd day of October, 2018 by and between the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and United Storm Water, Inc. (“Contractor”). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.” RECITALS A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals or Invitation for Bids, the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement. B. Contractor, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services. C. Pursuant to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement. D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Contractor for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. WORK OF CONTRACTOR 1.1 Scope of Work. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Contractor shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Work” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Contractor represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the work required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Contractor covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest A-2 540 -2- 01203.0006/507842.2 professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances. 1.2 Bid Documents. The Scope of Work shall include the “General Provisions” and “Special Provisions” in the bid documents for the project entitled Santa Monica Bay Catch Basin Insert Project, including any documents or exhibits referenced therein (collectively, “bid documents”), all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of the bid documents and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 1.3 Compliance with Law. Contractor shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered. 1.4 Compliance with California Labor Law. (a) Public Work. The Parties acknowledge that the work to be performed under this Agreement is a “public work” as defined in Labor Code Section 1720 and that this Agreement is therefore subject to the requirements of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works contracts and the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) implementing such statutes. The work performed under this Agreement is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Contractor shall post job site notices, as prescribed by regulation. (b) Prevailing Wages. Contractor shall pay prevailing wages to the extent required by Labor Code Section 1771. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. By initiating any work under this Agreement, Contractor acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination of the prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Contractor shall post a copy of the same at each job site where work is performed under this Agreement. (c) Penalty for Failure to Pay Prevailing Wages. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The Contractor shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by Contractor or by any subcontractor. (d) Payroll Records. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Contractor and each subcontractor to: keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in A-3 541 -3- 01203.0006/507842.2 Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776; and inform the City of the location of the records. (e) Apprentices. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Contractor shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations. Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Contractor shall provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within sixty (60) days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor and each of its subcontractors shall submit to the City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement. (f) Eight-Hour Work Day. Contractor acknowledges that eight (8) hours labor constitutes a legal day's work. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810. (g) Penalties for Excess Hours. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Contractor shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Contractor or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Contractor in excess of eight (8) hours per day, and forty (40) hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than one and one-half (1½) times the basic rate of pay. (h) Workers’ Compensation. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees if it has employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, Contractor certifies as follows: “I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.” Contractor’s Authorized Initials ________ (i) Contractor’s Responsibility for Subcontractors. For every subcontractor who will perform work under this Agreement, Contractor shall be responsible for such subcontractor's compliance with Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code, and shall make such compliance a requirement in any contract with any subcontractor for work under this Agreement. Contractor shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor's compliance, including A-4 542 -4- 01203.0006/507842.2 without limitation, conducting a review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor on a periodic basis or upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Contractor shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any such failure by any subcontractor. 1.5 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Contractor shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits, registrations, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Contractor shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Contractor’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder. 1.6 Familiarity with Work. (a) By executing this Agreement, Contractor warrants that Contractor (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of work to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Contractor warrants that Contractor has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services hereunder. (b) Contractor shall promptly, and before the following conditions are disturbed, notify the City, in writing, of any: (i) material Contractor believes may be hazardous waste as defined in Section 25117 of the Health & Safety Code required to be removed to a Class I, II, or III disposal site in accordance with existing law; (ii) subsurface, unknown or latent conditions, materially different from those indicated; or (iii) unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in this Agreement, and will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder. (c) City shall promptly investigate the conditions, and if it finds that the conditions do materially differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and cause a decrease or increase in Contractor's cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work, shall issue a change order per Section 1.10 of this Agreement. (d) In the event that a dispute arises between City and Contractor whether the conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or increase in Contractor's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, Contractor shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date set, but shall proceed with all work to be performed under the Agreement. Contractor shall retain any and all rights provided either by contract or by law, which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the contracting parties. (e) City will compensate Contractor to the extent required by Government Code Section 4215 by issuing a change order per Section 1.10 of this Agreement. A-5 543 -5- 01203.0006/507842.2 1.7 Protection and Care of Work and Materials. The Contractor shall adopt reasonable methods, including providing and maintaining storage facilities, during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as caused by City’s own negligence. Stored materials shall be reasonably accessible for inspection. Contractor shall not, without City’s consent, assign, sell, mortgage, hypothecate, or remove equipment or materials which have been installed or delivered and which may be necessary for the completion of the work. 1.8 Warranty. Contractor warrants all work under the Agreement (which for purposes of this Section shall be deemed to include unauthorized work which has not been removed and any non-conforming materials incorporated into the work) to be of good quality and free from any defective or faulty material and workmanship. Contractor agrees that for a period of one year (or the period of time specified elsewhere in the Agreement or in any guarantee or warranty provided by any manufacturer or supplier of equipment or materials incorporated into the work, whichever is later) after the date of final acceptance, Contractor shall within ten (10) days after being notified in writing by the City of any defect in the work or non-conformance of the work to the Agreement, commence and prosecute with due diligence all work necessary to fulfill the terms of the warranty at its sole cost and expense. Contractor shall act as soon as requested by the City in response to an emergency. In addition, Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, repair, remove and replace any portions of the work (or work of other contractors) damaged by its defective work or which becomes damaged in the course of repairing or replacing defective work. For any work so corrected, Contractor's obligation hereunder to correct defective work shall be reinstated for an additional one year period, commencing with the date of acceptance of such corrected work. Contractor shall perform such tests as the City may require to verify that any corrective actions, including, without limitation, redesign, repairs, and replacements comply with the requirements of the Agreement. All costs associated with such corrective actions and testing, including the removal, replacement, and reinstitution of equipment and materials necessary to gain access, shall be the sole responsibility of the Contractor. All warranties and guarantees of subcontractors, suppliers and manufacturers with respect to any portion of the work, whether express or implied, are deemed to be obtained by Contractor for the benefit of the City, regardless of whether or not such warranties and guarantees have been transferred or assigned to the City by separate agreement and Contractor agrees to enforce such warranties and guarantees, if necessary, on behalf of the City. In the event that Contractor fails to perform its obligations under this Section, or under any other warranty or guaranty under this Agreement, to the reasonable satisfaction of the City, the City shall have the right to correct and replace any defective or non-conforming work and any work damaged by such work or the replacement or correction thereof at Contractor's sole expense. Contractor shall be obligated to fully reimburse the City for any expenses incurred hereunder upon demand. 1.9 Further Responsibilities of Parties. Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, A-6 544 -6- 01203.0006/507842.2 prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other. 1.10 Additional Work and Change Orders. (a) City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Work or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written change order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Contractor, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Contractor (“Change Order”). All Change Orders must be signed by the Contractor and Contract Officer prior to commencing the extra work thereunder. (b) Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $25,000, whichever is less; or any increase in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days; and does not materially affect the Work and which are not detrimental to the Work or to the interest of the City, may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. (c) Any adjustment in the Contract Sum for a Change Order must be in accordance with the rates set forth in the Schedule of Compensation in Exhibit “C”. If the rates in the Schedule of Compensation do not cover the type of work in the Change Order, the cost of such work shall not exceed an amount agreed upon in writing and signed by Contractor and Contract Officer. If the cost of the Change Order cannot be agreed upon, the City will pay for actual work of the Change Order completed, to the satisfaction of the City, as follows: (i) Labor: the cost of labor shall be the actual cost for wages of workers and subcontractors performing the work for the Change Order at the time such work is done. The use of labor classifications that would increase the cost of such work shall not be permitted. (ii) Materials and Equipment: the cost of materials and equipment shall be at cost to Contractor or lowest current price which such materials and equipment are reasonably available at the time the work is done, whichever is lower. (iii) If the cost of the extra work cannot be agreed upon, the Contractor must provide a daily report that includes invoices for labor, materials and equipment costs for the work under the Change Order. The daily report must include: list of names of workers, classifications, and hours worked; description and list of quantities of materials used; type of equipment, size, identification number, and hours of operation, including loading and transportation, if applicable; description of other City authorized services and expenditures in such detail as the City may require. Failure to submit a daily report by the close of the next working day may, at the City’s sole and absolute discretion, waive the Contractor’s rights for that day. (d) It is expressly understood by Contractor that the provisions of this Section 1.10 shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Work. Contractor hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of A-7 545 -7- 01203.0006/507842.2 Work may be more costly or time consuming than Contractor anticipates and that Contractor shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other contractors. (e) No claim for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed. 1.11 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern. ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. 2.1 Contract Sum. Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Contractor the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed Seven Hundred Forty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Three Dollars ($744,943) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.10. 2.2 Method of Compensation. The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services less the contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Contractor’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. 2.3 Reimbursable Expenses. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Contractor at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City. Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If Contractor is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. A-8 546 -8- 01203.0006/507842.2 2.4 Invoices. Each month Contractor shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Contractor is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. The invoice shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Contractor shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person. City shall, as soon as practicable, independently review each invoice submitted by the Contractor to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Contractor which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will cause Contractor to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Contractor’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Contractor acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event that City does not cause Contractor to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of an undisputed and properly submitted invoice, Contractor shall be entitled to the payment of interest to the extent allowed under Public Contract Code Section 20104.50. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Contractor, not later than seven (7) days after receipt by the City, for correction and resubmission. Returned invoices shall be accompanied by a document setting forth in writing the reasons why the payment request was rejected. Review and payment by the City of any invoice provided by the Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law. 2.5 Waiver. Payment to Contractor for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Contractor. ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. Contractor shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Contractor, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively. A-9 547 -9- 01203.0006/507842.2 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Contractor shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Contractor be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Contractor’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section. 3.4 Inspection and Final Acceptance. City may inspect and accept or reject any of Contractor’s work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Contractor’s work within forty-five (45) days after submitted to City. City shall accept work by a timely written acceptance, otherwise work shall be deemed to have been rejected. City’s acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as to amount to fraud. Acceptance of any work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, Articles 1 and 5, pertaining to warranty and indemnification and insurance, respectively. 3.5 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding one (1) year from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit “D”). ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Contractor. The following principals of Contractor (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Contractor authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: ________________________ ________________________ Eduardo Perry, Jr. President ________________________ ________________________ Daniel C. Perry Chief Financial Officer A-10 548 -10- 01203.0006/507842.2 ________________________ ________________________ Robert S. Pina Secretary It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing Principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Contractor and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. All personnel of Contractor, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Contractor without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Contractor shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Contractor’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Contractor shall notify City of any changes in Contractor’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. 4.2 Status of Contractor. Contractor shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Contractor, nor any of Contractor’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Contractor expressly waives any claim Contractor may have to any such rights. 4.3 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be Elias Sassoon, Director of Public Works, and Ron Dragoo, Principal Engineer, or such person as may be designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Contractor’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Contractor shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Contractor, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Contractor’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Contractor shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent A-11 549 -11- 01203.0006/507842.2 contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Contractor in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Contractor. 4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Contractor, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Contractor shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. All subcontractors shall obtain, at its or Contractor’s expense, such licenses, permits, registrations and approvals (including from the City) as may be required by law for the performance of any services or work under this Agreement. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Contractor, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Contractor or any surety of Contractor of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City. ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE, INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS 5.1 Insurance Coverages. Without limiting Contractor’s indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, Contractor shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City. (a) General liability insurance. Contractor shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence, $4,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted. (b) Automobile liability insurance. Contractor shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Contractor arising out of or in connection with Services to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident. (c) Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Contractor shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this A-12 550 -12- 01203.0006/507842.2 Agreement and Contractor agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement. (d) Workers’ compensation insurance. Contractor shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000). (e) Subcontractors. Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. (f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”. 5.2 General Insurance Requirements. (a) Proof of insurance. Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Agreement. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. (b) Duration of coverage. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder by Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. (c) Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Contractor shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non- contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. (d) City’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Contractor or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Contractor payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement. (e) Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or that is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager. A-13 551 -13- 01203.0006/507842.2 (f) Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Contractor or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Contractor hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subcontractors. (g) Enforcement of contract provisions (non-estoppel). Contractor acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Contractor of non- compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder. (h) Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Contractor maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. (i) Notice of cancellation. Contractor agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to City with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage. (j) Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies. (k) Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. (l) Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Contractor’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions. (m) Pass through clause. Contractor agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Contractor, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Contractor. Contractor agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. A-14 552 -14- 01203.0006/507842.2 Contractor agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. (n) Agency’s right to revise specifications. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Contractor ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Contractor, the City and Contractor may renegotiate Contractor’s compensation. (o) Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by City. (p) Timely notice of claims. Contractor shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Contractor’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies. (q) Additional insurance. Contractor shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work. 5.3 Indemnification. To the full extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Contractor, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Contractor’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Contractor’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith: (a) Contractor will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith; (b) Contractor will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Contractor hereunder; and Contractor agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom; (c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Contractor for such damages or other claims A-15 553 -15- 01203.0006/507842.2 arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Contractor hereunder, Contractor agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys’ fees. In addition, Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from, any and all claims and liabilities for any infringement of patent rights, copyrights or trademark on any person or persons in consequence of the use by the Indemnified Parties of articles to be supplied by Contractor under this Agreement, and of which the Contractor is not the patentee or assignee or has not the lawful right to sell the same. Contractor shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Contractor shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Contractor in the performance of professional services and work hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Contractor and shall survive termination of this Agreement. 5.4 Notification of Third-Party Claims. City shall timely notify Contractor of the receipt of any third-party claim relating to the work under this Agreement. City shall be entitled to recover from Contractor its reasonable costs incurred in providing such notification. 5.5 Performance and Labor Bonds. Concurrently with execution of this Agreement Contractor shall deliver to the City, the following: (a) A performance bond in the amount of the Contract Sum of this Agreement, in the form provided by the City Clerk, which secures the faithful performance of this Agreement. (b) A labor and materials bond in the amount of the Contract Sum of this Agreement, in the form provided by the City Clerk, which secures the payment of all persons furnishing labor and/or materials in connection with the work under this Agreement. Both the performance and labors bonds required under this Section 5.5 shall contain the original notarized signature of an authorized officer of the surety and affixed thereto shall be a certified and current copy of his power of attorney. The bond shall be unconditional and remain in force during the entire term of the Agreement and shall be null and void only if the Contractor A-16 554 -16- 01203.0006/507842.2 promptly and faithfully performs all terms and conditions of this Agreement and pays all labor and materials for work and services under this Agreement. 5.6 Sufficiency of Insurer or Surety. Insurance and bonds required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by companies qualified to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best’s Rating Guide, The Key Rating Guide or in the Federal Register, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless such requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of the City (“Risk Manager”) due to unique circumstances. If this Agreement continues for more than 3 years duration, or in the event the Risk Manager determines that the work or services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to the City, the Contractor agrees that the minimum limits of the insurance policies and the performance bond required by Section 5.5 may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager. 5.7 Substitution of Securities. Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22300, substitution of eligible equivalent securities for any funds withheld to ensure performance under this Agreement may be permitted at the request and sole expense of the Contractor. Alternatively, the Contractor may, pursuant to an escrow agreement in a form prescribed by Public Contract Code Section 22300, request payment of retentions funds earned directly to the escrow agent at the sole expense of the Contractor. 5.8 Release of Securities. City shall release the Performance and Labor Bonds when the following have occurred: (a) Contractor has made a written request for release and provided evidence of satisfaction of all other requirements under Article 5 of this Agreement; (b) the Work has been accepted; and (c) after passage of the time within which lien claims are required to be made pursuant to applicable laws; if lien claims have been timely filed, City shall hold the Labor Bond until such claims have been resolved, Contractor has provided statutory bond, or otherwise as required by applicable law. ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION 6.1 Records. Contractor shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies, certified and accurate copies of payroll records in compliance with all applicable laws, or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be maintained in A-17 555 -17- 01203.0006/507842.2 accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of 3 years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Contractor’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Contractor’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Contractor shall fully cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act. 6.2 Reports. Contractor shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Contractor hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Contractor agrees that if Contractor becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Contractor is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Contractor shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Contractor is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”) prepared by Contractor, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Contractor shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Contractor will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Contractor, and Contractor’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Contractor may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Contractor shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Contractor fails to secure such assignment, Contractor shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Contractor with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City. A-18 556 -18- 01203.0006/507842.2 6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information. (a) information gained or work product produced by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Contractor. Contractor shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Contractor, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Contractor, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Contractor for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys’ fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Contractor’s conduct. (d) Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Contractor covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. 7.2 Disputes. (a) Default; Cure. In the event that Contractor is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to A-19 557 -19- 01203.0006/507842.2 Contractor of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Contractor may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Contractor is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall proceed with payment on the invoices only when the default is cured. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Contractor does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Contractor’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. (b) Dispute Resolution. This contract is subject to the provisions of Article 1.5 (commencing at Section 20104) of Division 2, Part 3 of the California Public Contract Code regarding the resolution of public works claims of less than $375,000. Article 1.5 mandates certain procedures for the filing of claims and supporting documentation by the Contractor, for the response to such claims by the City, for a mandatory meet and confer conference upon the request of the Contractor, for mandatory non-binding mediation in the event litigation is commenced, and for mandatory judicial arbitration upon the failure to resolve the dispute through mediation. This Agreement hereby incorporates the provisions of Article 1.5 as though fully set forth herein. 7.3 Retention of Funds. Contractor hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Contractor (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Contractor’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Contractor’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Contractor, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Contractor to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein. 7.4 Waiver. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non- defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. A-20 558 -20- 01203.0006/507842.2 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Contractor shall file a claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement. 7.7 Liquidated Damages. Since the determination of actual damages for any delay in performance of this Agreement would be extremely difficult or impractical to determine in the event of a breach of this Agreement, the Contractor and its sureties shall be liable for and shall pay to the City the sum of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) as liquidated damages for each working day of delay in the performance of any service required hereunder, as specified in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit “D”). The City may withhold from any monies payable on account of services performed by the Contractor any accrued liquidated damages. Pursuant to Government Code Section 4215, Contractor shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay in completion of the project when such delay was caused by the failure of the public agency or owner of the utility to provide for removal or relocation of utility facilities. 7.8 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Contractor, except that where termination is due to the fault of the Contractor, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, the Contractor reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of the City, the period of notice may be such shorter time as the Contractor may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Contractor shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Contractor has initiated termination, the Contractor shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Contractor has initiated termination, the Contractor shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the A-21 559 -21- 01203.0006/507842.2 terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2. 7.9 Termination for Default of Contractor. If termination is due to the failure of the Contractor to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Contractor shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Contractor for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated. 7.10 Attorneys’ Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. 7.11 Unfair Business Practices Claims. In entering into this Agreement, Contractor offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services or materials related to this Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City renders final payment to the Contractor without further acknowledgment of the Parties. ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION 8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Contractor, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Contractor or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 8.2 Conflict of Interest. Contractor covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contractor’s performance of services under this A-22 560 -22- 01203.0006/507842.2 Agreement. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Contractor agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which effects his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Contractor warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Contractor covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, or other protected class. 8.4 Unauthorized Aliens. Contractor hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Contractor so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Contractor hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City. ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notices. Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of Rancho Palos Verdes, 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard, Ranchos Palos Verdes, California 90275 and in the case of the Contractor, to the person at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. All correspondence relating to this Agreement shall be serialized consecutively. A-23 561 -23- 01203.0006/507842.2 9.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. 9.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 9.4 Integration; Amendment. This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Contractor and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. 9.5 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. 9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion. No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Contractor warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Contractor further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, A-24 562 -24- 01203.0006/507842.2 as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Contractor is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect. Contractor’s Authorized Initials _______ 9.7 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] A-25 563 -25- 01203.0006/507842.2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written. CITY: CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a municipal corporation ____________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP City Attorney CONTRACTOR: ____________________________________ By: _______________________________ Name: Title: By: _________________________________ Name: Title: Address: Two corporate officer signatures required when Contractor is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONTRACTOR’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTOR’S BUSINESS ENTITY. A-26 564 01203.0006/507842.2 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES On __________, 2018 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. A-27 565 01203.0006/507842.2 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES On __________, 2018 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. A-28 566 01203.0006/507842.2 A-1 EXHIBIT “A” SCOPE OF WORK I. Contractor shall perform all of the work and comply with all of the specifications and requirements in the “General Provisions” and “Special Provisions” included in the bid documents for the project entitled Santa Monica Bay Catch Basin Insert Project, including any documents or exhibits referenced therein. II. Brief description of the work to be performed: In general, the work comprises but is not limited to furnishing all necessary labor, materials, equipment and other incidental and appurtenant work necessary to install 1,337 connector pipe screen (CPS) units in existing catch basins draining into Santa Monica Bay, at various locations throughout the City, as more clearly described in the Contract Documents. This work will be performed in strict conformance with the Contract Documents, permits from regulatory agencies with jurisdiction, and applicable regulations. The quantity of work to be performed and materials to be furnished are approximate only, being given as a basis for the comparison of Bids. Actual quantities of work to be performed may vary at the discretion of the City’s Contract Officer. III. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the work, Contractor will keep the City apprised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports: A. Daily Reports B. Certified Payroll IV. All work is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Contractor without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City. V. Contractor shall provide safe and continuous passage for pedestrian and vehicular traffic in accordance with the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH), latest edition. A-29 567 01203.0006/507842.2 B-1 EXHIBIT “B” SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (Superseding Contract Boilerplate) A-30 568 01203.0006/507842.2 C-1 EXHIBIT “C” SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION I. Contractor shall perform all work at the rates on the Bid Sheet submitted as part of Contractor’s Proposal, and listed below: BID SCHEDULE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES Item Number DESCRIPTION Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount 1 Pre-Construction Cleaning of Catch Basin and Legal Disposal of Debris 818 Each $68.00 $55,624.00 2 Furnish and Install Certified Full Capture Connector Pipe Screen in Existing Catch Basin 818 Lump Sum $367.00 $300,206.00 3 Repair Catch Basin (Allowance of $20,000) 1 Allowa nce $20,000.00 $20,000.00 4 Provide Warranty Bond as required 1 Lump Sum $7,600.00 $7,600.00 5 Make Application and Obtain LACFCD Flood Permit 30 Each $150.00 $37,500.00 TOTAL BID – RANCHO PALOS VERDES $420,930 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES Item Number DESCRIPTION Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount 1 Pre-Construction Cleaning of Catch Basin and Legal Disposal of Debris 42 Each $68.00 $2,856.00 2 Furnish and Install Certified Full Capture Connector Pipe Screen in Existing Catch Basin 42 Lump Sum $367.00 $15,414.00 3 Repair Catch Basin (Allowance of $20,000) 1 Allowa nce $20,000.00 $20,000.00 4 Provide Warranty Bond as required 1 Lump Sum $2,000.00 $2,000.00 5 Make Application and Obtain LACFCD Flood Permit 30 Each $150.00 $4,500.00 TOTAL BID – ROLLING HILLS ESTATES $44,770 A-31 569 01203.0006/507842.2 C-2 CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES Item Number DESCRIPTION Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Amount 1 Cleanout Existing Catch Basins 477 Each $68.00 $32,436.00 2 Furnish and Install Certified Full Capture Connector Pipe Screen in Existing Catch Basin 477 Each $367.00 $175,059.00 3 Photographic Documentation of the Work 1 Lump Sum $1,500.00 $1,500.00 4 Repair Catch Basin (Allowance of $20,000) 1 Allowa nce $20,000.00 $20,000.00 5 Provide Warranty Bond as required 1 Lump Sum $2,500.00 $2,500.00 6 Stencil “NO DUMPING” 477 Each $74.00 $35,298.00 7 Make Application and Obtain LACFCD Flood Permit 83 Each $150.00 $12,450.00 TOTAL BID – PALOS VERDES ESTATES $279,243 Note: Some items may be adjusted or deleted. Any changes to the quantities for these items shall not classify as a substantial change as stipulated in Section 3-2.2.1 of the Standard Specifications. Therefore, regardless of total actual amount (percentage) compared to estimated quantities, the unit prices provided above by the Bidder shall be applied to the final quantity when payment is calculated for these items. No adjustment in the unit prices will be allowed. The City reserves the right to not use any of the estimated quantities, and if this right is exercised, the Contractor will not be entitled to any additional compensation. Cost of all export of material shall be included in the above unit costs; no additional compensation will be granted for such expenses. The Contract shall be awarded to the lowest responsible Bidder based on the total Bid price. TOTAL BID SCHEDULE IN NUMBERS: $744,943 (Seven Hundred Forty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Three Dollars) II. A retention of five percent (5%) shall be held from each payment as a contract retention to be paid as part of the final payment upon satisfactory completion of services. III. Within the budgeted amounts for each item on the Bid Sheet, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one item’s subbudget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Work is approved per Section 1.10. IV. The City will compensate Contractor for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include: A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate. A-32 570 01203.0006/507842.2 C-3 B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services. C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation. D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services. V. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed $744,943 as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement. A-33 571 01203.0006/507842.2 D-1 EXHIBIT “D” SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE I. Contractor shall perform all work timely in accordance with the following schedule: Prior to the Notice to Proceed, the Contractor must submit a project schedule for approval. Days to Perform Deadline Date A. Installation of CPS Units 220 Days November 2019 II. Contractor shall deliver the following tangible work products to the City by the following dates. A. Daily Reports will be delivered to the City weekly. Daily Reports must be delivered and accepted prior to any progress payment up until the date that work is being invoiced for. B. Certified payroll will be delivered to the City biweekly. Certified payroll must be delivered and accepted prior to any progress payment up until the date that work is being invoiced for. III. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the services in accordance with Section 3.2. A-34 572 01203.0006/507842.2 D-1 PERFORMANCE BOND WHEREAS, the CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, (“City”), has awarded to __________________________________, as Contractor (“Principal”), a Contract for the work entitled and described as follows:__________________________________________________; WHEREAS, the Contractor is required under the terms of said Contract to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of the Contract; NOW, THEREFORE, we the undersigned Contractor and Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the sum of ________________________________________ ($______________), this amount being not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the total Contract price, lawful money of the United States of America, for payment of which sum well and truly be made we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, and successors, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. In case suit is brought upon this bond, the Surety will pay a reasonable attorney’s fee to the City in an amount to be fixed by the court. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT, if the hereby bound Contractor, or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things stand and abide by, well and truly keep and perform all undertakings, terms, covenants, conditions, and agreements in the said Contract and any alteration thereof, made as therein provided, all within the time and in the manner designated and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. FURTHER, the said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or modification of the Contract Documents or of the work to be performed thereunder shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of such change, extension of time, alteration, or modification of the Contract Documents or of the work to be performed thereunder. Executed on 20___. PRINCIPAL (Seal if Corporation) By Title (Attach Acknowledgment of Authorized Representative of Principal) A-35 573 01203.0006/507842.2 D-2 Any claims under this bond may be addressed to: (name and address of Surety) (name and address of Surety's agent for service of process in California, if different from above) (telephone number of Surety's agent in California) (Attach Acknowledgment) SURETY By (Attorney-in-Fact) APPROVED: (Attorney for CITY) NOTICE: No substitution or revision to this bond form will be accepted. Sureties must be authorized to do business in and have an agent for service of process in California. Certified copy of Power of Attorney must be attached. A-36 574 01203.0006/507842.2 PAYMENT BOND (Labor and Material Bond) WHEREAS, the CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, (“City”), has awarded to __________________________________, as Contractor (“Principal”), a Contract for the work entitled and described as follows:__________________________________________________; WHEREAS, said Contractor is required to furnish a bond in conjunction with said Contract, to secure the payment of claims of laborers, mechanics, material men, and other persons as provided by law; NOW, THEREFORE, we the undersigned Contractor and Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the sum of ________________________________________ ($______________), this amount being not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the total Contract price, lawful money of the United States of America, for payment of which sum well and truly be made we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, and successors, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. In case suit is brought upon this bond, the Surety will pay a reasonable attorney’s fee to the City in an amount to be fixed by the court. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT, if said Contractor, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, assigns, or subcontractor fails to pay: (1) for any work, materials, services, provisions, provender, or other supplies, or for the use of implements of machinery, used in, upon, for, or about the performance of the work to be done, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind; (2) for work performed by any of the persons named in Civil Code Section 9100; (3) for any amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed under the contract; and/or (4) for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of the Contractor and/or its subcontractors pursuant to Section 13020 of the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such work and labor, then the Surety herein will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond, otherwise the above obligation shall be void. This bond shall inure to the benefit of any of the persons named in Civil Code Section 9100 so as to give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon the bond. Moreover, if the City or any entity or person entitled to file stop payment notices is required to engage the services of an attorney in connection with the enforcement of this bond, each shall be liable for the reasonable attorney's fees incurred, with or without suit, in addition to the above sum. Said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or modification of the Contract Documents or of the work to be performed thereunder shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of such change, extension of time, alteration, or modification of the Contract Documents or of the work to be performed thereunder. A-37 575 01203.0006/507842.2 Executed on , 20____. PRINCIPAL (Seal if Corporation) By Title (Attach Acknowledgment of Authorized Representative of Principal) Any claims under this bond may be addressed to: (name and address of Surety) (name and address of Surety's agent for service of process in California, if different from above) (telephone number of Surety's agent in California) (Attach Acknowledgment) SURETY By (Attorney-in-Fact) APPROVED: (Attorney for CITY) NOTICE: No substitution or revision to this bond form will be accepted. Sureties must be authorized to do business in and have an agent for service of process in California. Certified copy of Power of Attorney must be attached. A-38 576 01203.0006/507842.2 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATE Description of Contract: City of Rancho Palos Verdes Project: _____________________________________________ Type of Insurance: Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability Insurance THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the following policy has been issued by the below-stated company in conformance with the requirements of Article 5 of the Contract and is in force at this time, and is in a form approved by the Insurance Commissioner. The Company will give at least 30 days' written notice to the City and Engineer/Architect prior to any cancellation of said policy. POLICY NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE LIMITS OF LIABILITY Workers' Compensation: Statutory Limits Under the Laws of the State of California Employers' Liability: $_________________ Each Accident $_________________ Disease - Policy Limit $_________________ Disease - Each Employee Named Insured (Contractor) Insurance Company Street Number Street Number City and State City and State By (Company Representative) (SEE NOTICE ON NEXT PAGE) A-39 577 01203.0006/507842.2 Insurance Company Agent for Service of Process in California: Name Agency Street Number City and State Telephone Number This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. This certificate does not amend, extend, or alter the coverage afforded by the policy listed herein. This is to certify that the policy has been issued to the named insured for the policy period indicated, notwithstanding any requirement, term, or condition of any contract or other document with respect to which this certificate may be issued or may pertain, the insurance afforded by the policy described herein is subject to all the terms, exclusions, and conditions of such policy. NOTICE: No substitution or revision to the above certificate form will be accepted. If the insurance called for is provided by more than one insurance company, a separate certificate in the exact above form shall be provided for each insurance company. A-40 578 01203.0006/507842.2 ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY Name and address of named insured (“Named Insured”) Name and address of Insurance Company (“Company”) General description of agreement(s), permit(s), license(s), and/or activity(ies) insured Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached (the “Policy”) or in any endorsement now or hereafter attached thereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. The (“Public Agency”), its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, and volunteers are additional insureds (the above named additional insureds are hereafter referred to as the “Additional Insureds”) under the Policy in relation to those activities described generally above with regard to operations performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured. The Additional Insureds have no liability for the payment of any premiums or assessments under the Policy. 2. The insurance coverages afforded the Additional Insureds under the Policy shall be primary insurance, and no other insurance maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be called upon to contribute with the insurance coverages provided by the Policy. 3. Each insurance coverage under the Policy shall apply separately to each Additional Insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the limits of the Company's liability. 4. Nothing in this contract of insurance shall be construed to preclude coverage of a claim by one insured under the policy against another insured under the policy. All such claims shall be covered as third-party claims, i.e., in the same manner as if separate policies had been issued to each insured. Nothing contained in this provision shall operate to increase or replicate the Company's limits of liability as provided under the policy. 5. The insurance afforded by the Policy for contractual liability insurance (subject to the terms, conditions and exclusions applicable to such insurance) includes liability assumed by the Named Insured under the indemnification and/or hold harmless provision(s) contained in or executed in conjunction with the written agreement(s) or permit(s) designated above, between the Named Insured and the Additional Insureds. 6. The policy to which this endorsement is attached shall not be subject to cancellation, change in coverage, reduction of limits (except as the result of the payment of claims), or non-renewal except after written notice to Public Agency, by certified mail, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days prior to the effective date thereof. In the event of Company's failure to comply with this notice provision, the policy as initially drafted will continue in full force and effect until compliance with this notice requirement. 7. Company hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Additional Insureds, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to the perils insured against in relation to those activities described generally above with regard to operations performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Additional Insureds. A-41 579 01203.0006/507842.2 8. It is hereby agreed that the laws of the State of California shall apply to and govern the validity, construction, interpretation, and enforcement of this contract of insurance. 9. This endorsement and all notices given hereunder shall be sent to Public Agency at: City Manager, City of Rancho Palos Verdes, 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard, Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275. 10. Except as stated above and not in conflict with this endorsement, nothing contained herein shall be held to waive, alter or extend any of the limits, agreements, or exclusions of the policy to which this endorsement is attached. TYPE OF COVERAGES TO WHICH POLICY PERIOD LIMITS OF THIS ENDORSEMENT ATTACHES FROM/TO LIABILITY 11. Scheduled items or locations are to be identified on an attached sheet. The following inclusions relate to the above coverages. Includes: □ Contractual Liability □ Explosion Hazard □ Owners/Landlords/Tenants □ Collapse Hazard □ Manufacturers/Contractors □ Underground Property Damage □ Products/Completed Operations □ Pollution Liability □ Broad Form Property Damage □ Liquor Liability □ Extended Bodily Injury □ □ Broad Form Comprehensive □ General Liability Endorsement □ 12. A □ deductible or □ self-insured retention (check one) of $ applies to all coverage(s) except: (if none, so state). The deductible is applicable □ per claim or □ per occurrence (check one). 13. This is an □ occurrence or □ claims made policy (check one). 14. This endorsement is effective on at 12:01 a.m. and forms a part of Policy Number . (signatures on following page) A-42 580 01203.0006/507842.2 I, (print name), hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that I have the authority to bind the Company to this endorsement and that by my execution hereof, I do so bind the Company. Executed , 20 Signature of Authorized Representative (Original signature only; no facsimile signature Telephone No.: ( ) or initialed signature accepted) A-43 581 01203.0006/507842.2 ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Name and address of named insured (“Named Insured”) Name and address of Insurance Company (“Company”) General description of agreement(s), permit(s), license(s), and/or activity(ies) insured Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached (the “Policy”) or in any endorsement now or hereafter attached thereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. The (“Public Agency”), its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, and volunteers are additional insureds (the above named additional insureds are hereafter referred to as the “Additional Insureds”) under the Policy in relation to those activities described generally above with regard to operations performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured. The Additional Insureds have no liability for the payment of any premiums or assessments under the Policy. 2. The insurance coverages afforded the Additional Insureds under the Policy shall be primary insurance, and no other insurance maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be called upon to contribute with the insurance coverages provided by the Policy. 3. Each insurance coverage under the Policy shall apply separately to each Additional Insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the limits of the Company's liability. 4. Nothing in this contract of insurance shall be construed to preclude coverage of a claim by one insured under the policy against another insured under the policy. All such claims shall be covered as third-party claims, i.e., in the same manner as if separate policies had been issued to each insured. Nothing contained in this provision shall operate to increase or replicate the Company's limits of liability as provided under the policy. 5. The insurance afforded by the Policy for contractual liability insurance (subject to the terms, conditions and exclusions applicable to such insurance) includes liability assumed by the Named Insured under the indemnification and/or hold harmless provision(s) contained or executed in conjunction with the written agreement(s) or permit(s) designated above, between the Named Insured and the Additional Insureds. 6. The policy to which this endorsement is attached shall not be subject to cancellation, change in coverage, reduction of limits (except as the result of the payment of claims), or non-renewal except after written notice to Public Agency, by certified mail, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days prior to the effective date thereto. In the event of Company's failure to comply with this notice provision, the policy as initially drafted will continue in full force and effect until compliance with this notice requirement. 7. Company hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Additional Insureds, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to the perils insured against in relation to those activities described generally above with regard to operations performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Additional Insureds. A-44 582 01203.0006/507842.2 8. It is hereby agreed that the laws of the State of California shall apply to and govern the validity, construction, interpretation, and enforcement of this contract of insurance. 9. This endorsement and all notices given hereunder shall be sent to Public Agency at: City Manager City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275 10. Except as stated above and not in conflict with this endorsement, nothing contained herein shall be held to waive, alter or extend any of the limits, agreements, or exclusions of the policy to which this endorsement is attached. TYPE OF COVERAGES TO WHICH POLICY PERIOD LIMITS OF THIS ENDORSEMENT ATTACHES FROM/TO LIABILITY 11. Scheduled items or locations are to be identified on an attached sheet. The following inclusions relate to the above coverages. Includes: □ Any Automobiles □ Truckers Coverage □ All Owned Automobiles □ Motor Carrier Act □ Non-owned Automobiles □ Bus Regulatory Reform Act □ Hired Automobiles □ Public Livery Coverage □ Scheduled Automobiles □ □ Garage Coverage □ 12. A □ deductible or □ self-insured retention (check one) of $ applies to all coverage(s) except: (if none, so state). The deductible is applicable □ per claim or □ per occurrence (check one). 13. This is an □ occurrence or □ claims made policy (check one). 14. This endorsement is effective on at 12:01 a.m. and forms a part of Policy Number . (signatures on following page) A-45 583 01203.0006/507842.2 I, (print name), hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that I have the authority to bind the Company to this endorsement and that by my execution hereof, I do so bind the Company. Executed , 20 Signature of Authorized Representative (Original signature only; no facsimile signature Telephone No.: ( ) or initialed signature accepted) A-46 584 01203.0006/507842.2 ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT EXCESS LIABILITY Name and address of named insured (“Named Insured”) Name and address of Insurance Company (“Company”) General description of agreement(s), permit(s), license(s), and/or activity(ies) insured Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached (the “Policy”) or in any endorsement now or hereafter attached thereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. The (“Public Agency”), its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, and volunteers are additional insureds (the above named additional insureds are hereafter referred to as the “Additional Insureds”) under the Policy in relation to those activities described generally above with regard to operations performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured. The Additional Insureds have no liability for the payment of any premiums or assessments under the Policy. 2. The insurance coverages afforded the Additional Insureds under the Policy shall be primary insurance, and no other insurance maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be called upon to contribute with the insurance coverages provided by the Policy. 3. Each insurance coverage under the Policy shall apply separately to each Additional Insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the Company's liability. 4. Nothing in this contract of insurance shall be construed to preclude coverage of a claim by one insured under the policy against another insured under the policy. All such claims shall be covered as third-party claims, i.e., in the same manner as if separate policies had been issued to each insured. Nothing contained in this provision shall operate to increase or replicate the Company's limits of liability as provided under the policy. 5. The insurance afforded by the Policy for contractual liability insurance (subject to the terms, conditions and exclusions applicable to such insurance) includes liability assumed by the Named Insured under the indemnification and/or hold harmless provision(s) contained in or executed in conjunction with the written agreement(s) or permit(s) designated above, between the Named Insured and the Additional Insureds. 6. The policy to which this endorsement is attached shall not be subject to cancellation, change in coverage, reduction of limits (except as the result of the payment of claims), or non-renewal except after written notice to Public Agency, by certified mail, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days prior to the effective date thereto. In the event of Company's failure to comply with this notice provision, the policy as initially drafted will continue in full force and effect until compliance with this notice requirement. 7. Company hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Additional Insureds, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to the perils insured against in relation to those activities described generally above with regard to operations performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Additional Insureds. 8. It is hereby agreed that the laws of the State of California shall apply to and govern the validity, construction, interpretation, and enforcement of this contract of insurance. A-47 585 01203.0006/507842.2 9. This endorsement and all notices given hereunder shall be sent to Public Agency at: City Manager City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275 10. Except as stated above and not in conflict with this endorsement, nothing contained herein shall be held to waive, alter or extend any of the limits, agreements, or exclusions of the policy to which this endorsement is attached. TYPE OF COVERAGES TO WHICH POLICY PERIOD LIMITS OF THIS ENDORSEMENT ATTACHES FROM/TO LIABILITY □ Following Form □ Umbrella Liability □ 11. Applicable underlying coverages: INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. AMOUNT 12. The following inclusions, exclusions, extensions or specific provisions relate to the above coverages: 13. A □ deductible or □ self-insured retention (check one) of $ applies to all coverage(s) except: (if none, so state). The deductible is applicable □ per claim or □ per occurrence (check one). 14. This is an □ occurrence or □ claims made policy (check one). 15. This endorsement is effective on at 12:01 a.m. and forms a part of Policy Number . (signatures on following page) A-48 586 01203.0006/507842.2 I, (print name), hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that I have the authority to bind the Company to this endorsement and that by my execution hereof, I do so bind the Company. Executed , 20 Signature of Authorized Representative (Original signature only; no facsimile signature Telephone No.: ( ) or initialed signature accepted) A-49 587 01203.0006/507841.1 1 CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT By and Between CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES and PSOMAS B-1 588 01203.0006/507841.1 AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND PSOMAS THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 2nd day of October 2018 by and between the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and PSOMAS, (“Consultant”). City and Consultant may be referred to, individually or collectively, as “Party” or “Parties.” RECITALS A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals or Invitation for Bids, the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement. B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services. C. Pursuant to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes’ Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement. D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional standards” shall mean those B-2 589 01203.0006/507841.1 2 standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances. 1.2 Consultant’s Proposal. The Scope of Service shall include the Consultant’s scope of work or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 1.3 Compliance with Law. Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered. 1.4 California Labor Law. If the Scope of Services includes any “public work” or “maintenance work,” as those terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq., and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in California Labor Code section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws, including the following requirements: (a) Public Work. The Parties acknowledge that some or all of the work to be performed under this Agreement is a “public work” as defined in Labor Code Section 1720 and that this Agreement is therefore subject to the requirements of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works contracts and the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) implementing such statutes. The work performed under this Agreement is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Contractor shall post job site notices, as prescribed by regulation. (b) Prevailing Wages. Contractor shall pay prevailing wages to the extent required by Labor Code Section 1771. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. By initiating any work under this Agreement, Contractor acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination of the prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Contractor shall post a copy of the same at each job site where work is performed under this Agreement. (c) Penalty for Failure to Pay Prevailing Wages. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The Contractor shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar B-3 590 01203.0006/507841.1 3 day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by Contractor or by any subcontractor. (d) Payroll Records. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Contractor and each subcontractor to: keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776; and inform the City of the location of the records. (e) Apprentices. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Contractor shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations. Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Contractor shall provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within sixty (60) days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor and each of its subcontractors shall submit to the City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement. (f) Eight-Hour Work Day. Contractor acknowledges that eight (8) hours labor constitutes a legal day's work. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810. (g) Penalties for Excess Hours. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Contractor shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Contractor or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Contractor in excess of eight (8) hours per day, and forty (40) hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than one and one-half (1½) times the basic rate of pay. (h) Workers’ Compensation. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees if it has employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, Contractor certifies as follows: “I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.” B-4 591 01203.0006/507841.1 4 Contractor’s Authorized Initials ________ (i) Contractor’s Responsibility for Subcontractors. For every subcontractor who will perform work under this Agreement, Contractor shall be responsible for such subcontractor's compliance with Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code, and shall make such compliance a requirement in any contract with any subcontractor for work under this Agreement. Contractor shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor's compliance, including without limitation, conducting a review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor on a periodic basis or upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Contractor shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any such failure by any subcontractor. 1.5 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder. 1.6 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer. 1.7 Care of Work. The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence. B-5 592 01203.0006/507841.1 5 1.8 Further Responsibilities of Parties. Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other. 1.9 Additional Services. City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $25,000, whichever is less; or, in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days, may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other contractors. No claims for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed. 1.10 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern. ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. 2.1 Contract Sum. Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed Two Hundred Twenty-Six Thousand Six Hundred Eighty Dollars ($226,680) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.9. B-6 593 01203.0006/507841.1 6 2.2 Method of Compensation. The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services, less contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained, and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. 2.3 Reimbursable Expenses. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City. Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. 2.4 Invoices. Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. The invoice shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law. 2.5 Waiver. Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant. B-7 594 01203.0006/507841.1 7 ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding three (3) years from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit “D”). The City may, in its sole discretion, extend the Term for one additional one-year term. ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant. The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: B-8 595 01203.0006/507841.1 8 Reuben Tolentino Principal/Vice President (Name) (Title) Chris McNary Construction Manager (Name) (Title) It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. 4.2 Status of Consultant. Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights. 4.3 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be such person as may be designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement. B-9 596 01203.0006/507841.1 9 4.4 Independent Consultant. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant. 4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any su rety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City. ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION 5.1 Insurance Coverages. Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City. (a) General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted. (b) Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury B-10 597 01203.0006/507841.1 10 and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Services to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non- owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident. (c) Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement. (d) Workers’ compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000). (e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. (f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”. 5.2 General Insurance Requirements. (a) Proof of insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Agreement. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. (b) Duration of coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants. (c) Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non- contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. B-11 598 01203.0006/507841.1 11 (d) City’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement. (e) Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or that is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager. (f) Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants. (g) Enforcement of contract provisions (non-estoppel). Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder. (h) Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. (i) Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to City with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage. (j) Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies. B-12 599 01203.0006/507841.1 12 (k) Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. (l) Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions. (m) Pass through clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. (n) Agency’s right to revise specifications. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant’s compensation. (o) Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by City. (p) Timely notice of claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies. (q) Additional insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work. 5.3 Indemnification. To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or B-13 600 01203.0006/507841.1 13 entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith: (a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith; (b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom; (c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys’ fees. Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION 6.1 Records. Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make B-14 601 01203.0006/507841.1 14 records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act. 6.2 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”) prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City. 6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such B-15 602 01203.0006/507841.1 15 information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. 7.2 Disputes; Default. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the B-16 603 01203.0006/507841.1 16 invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. 7.3 Retention of Funds. Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein. 7.4 Waiver. Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary B-17 604 01203.0006/507841.1 17 provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement. 7.7 Liquidated Damages. Since the determination of actual damages for any delay in performance of this Agreement would be extremely difficult or impractical to determine in the event of a breach of this Agreement, the Contractor and its sureties shall be liable for and shall pay to the City the sum of ____________________________________ ($___________) as liquidated damages for each working day of delay in the performance of any service required hereunder. The City may withhold from any monies payable on account of services performed by the Contractor any accrued liquidated damages. 7.8 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, the Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days ’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of the City, the period of notice may be such shorter time as the Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2. 7.9 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated. B-18 605 01203.0006/507841.1 18 7.10 Attorneys’ Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION 8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 8.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, B-19 606 01203.0006/507841.1 19 religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class. 8.4 Unauthorized Aliens. Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by City. ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notices. Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of Rancho Palos Verdes, 30940 Hawthorne Blvd., Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275 and in the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. 9.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. 9.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 9.4 Integration; Amendment. This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. B-20 607 01203.0006/507841.1 20 9.5 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. 9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion. No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect. Consultant’s Authorized Initials _______ 9.7 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] B-21 608 01203.0006/507841.1 21 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written. CITY: CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a municipal corporation Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP City Attorney CONSULTANT: PSOMAS By: Name: Reuben Tolentino Title: Principal/Vice President By: Name: Title: Address: 555 S. Flower St. Los Angeles, CA 90071 Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY. B-22 609 01203.0006/507841.1 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES On __________, 2018 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. B-23 610 01203.0006/507841.1 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO On __________, 2018 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: _____________________________________ OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER _______________________________ TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER_______________________________ ______________________________________ SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)) _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ NUMBER OF PAGES ___________________________________ DATE OF DOCUMENT ___________________________________ SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. B-24 611 01203.0006/507841.1 A-1 EXHIBIT “A” SCOPE OF SERVICES I. Consultant will perform the following services: (a) Oversee adherence to the requirements of the bid documents and normal construction practices through Construction Management and Inspection. (b) Communicate with the City’s Contract Officer on a daily basis to give job statuses (c) Prepare Daily Inspection Reports (d) Assure the job moves forward with the City’s and residents’ best interest in mind (e) Provide safety oversight, especially in regards to the general public (f) Attend and facilitate progress meetings every two weeks. (g) Attend and facilitate pre-construction meeting (h) Serve as liaison between City Staff, the designers, construction contractor, and construction manager (i) Respond to resident concerns in a timely fashion (j) Assist staff with public relations during construction (k) Work with the project manager to develop a final punch list (l) Collaborate with the project manager to aid with the inspection once the final punch list is completed III. As part of the Services, Consultant shall prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City: A. Meeting minutes and a revised project schedule B. Monthly project status report C. Project status updates D. Daily Inspection Reports E. RFI Logs F. Submittals and Shop Drawing Logs G. Final Punch List IV. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the Services, Consultant shall keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports: A. Consultant will provide a weekly activity report. V. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City. B-25 612 01203.0006/507841.1 A-2 VI. Consultant shall utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services: A. Reuben Tolentino, Project Director B. Chris McNary, Construction Manager/Inspector B-26 613 01203.0006/507841.1 B-1 EXHIBIT “B” SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (Superseding Contract Boilerplate) I. Section 7.7, Liquidated Damages, is deleted in its entirety. B-27 614 01203.0006/507841.1 D-1 EXHIBIT “C” SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION I. Consultant shall perform the following tasks II. A retention of ten percent (10%) shall be held from each payment as a contract retention to be paid as part of the final payment upon satisfactory completion of services. NOT APPLICABLE B-28 615 01203.0006/507841.1 D-2 III. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task subbudget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.9. IV. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include: A. Monthly invoices will be provided with a cover letter summarizing services completed during the prior billing cycle and a forecast of anticipated services to be completed in the next billing cycle. B. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate. C. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services. D. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation. E. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services. V. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed the Contract Sum as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement. VI. The Consultant’s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit C-1. NOT APPLICABLE B-29 616 01203.0006/507841.1 D-3 B-30 617 01203.0006/507841.1 D-4 EXHIBIT “D” SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE I. Contractor shall perform all work timely in accordance with the following schedule: A. Execution of Agreement – Contractor shall execute the Agreement, and return to the City for execution by the City, accompanied by the bonds and evidence of insurance required by the bid documents, within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of mailing of the written notice to Contractor of award of the project. B. Pre-Construction Meeting – The Contractor shall attend a pre-construction meeting with the Director of Public Works or his authorized representative, within fifteen (15) calendar days of the Agreement’s execution. C. Work Schedule and Notice To Proceed – Within seven (7) days after the preconstruction meeting, Contractor shall supply the City with all project submittals setting forth a schedule for Contractor’s performance of the work. City shall issue the Notice to Proceed at any time after. City shall not issue a Notice to Proceed until it has received a work schedule to the satisfaction of the City. The work schedule approved by the City shall be incorporated into this Agreement as though set forth in full herein. D. Completion of Work– All work shall be completed by the Contractor within two hundred twenty (220) working days following the date indicated on the Notice to Proceed. II. Contractor shall deliver the following tangible work products to the City by the following dates. A. Daily Inspection Reports B. RFI Logs - 220 Days from Notice To Proceed C. Submittals and Shop Drawing Logs - 220 Days from Notice To Proceed D. Final Punch List - 220 Days from Notice To Proceed III. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the services in accordance with Section 3.2. B-31 618 C-1 619 C-2 620 C-3 621 C-4 622 C-5 623 C-6 624 C-7 625 C-8 626 C-9 627 C-10 628 C-11 629 C-12 630 C-13 631 Bill To: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CIVIC CENTER 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Customer ID SalesPerson Job Site Location: SALES ESTIMATE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CIVIC CENTER 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Sales Quote Number: Sales Quote Date: CIHE10000 Ramon Menjivar 626-890-7104 Page: SWQ63715 12/04/19 1 Ship Via Terms City of Industry CA 91746 14000 E. Valley Blvd. United Storm Water, Inc. Project Name (626) 961-9326 Contractor License No.: 768583 Tel No.: Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) DIR Registration No.: 1000012438 Goods No. UnitDescription Quantity Unit Price Total Price No. of Units C0000 EACH192 22.00 4,224.00Pre-Contruction CB Cleaning Phase #1 1 C0000 EACH192 367.00 70,464.00Furnish and Install Certified CPS units Full Capture 1 C0000 EACH111 125.00 13,875.00Obtain LACFCD Data for permit (optional 1 0.00 88,563.00 88,563.00 0.00 0.00 88,563.00 Subtotal: Invoice Discount: Total: Amount Subject to Sales Tax Amount Exempt from Sales Tax Total Sales Tax: 632 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 1 of 15 This Construction Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the date executed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk, by and between United Storm Water, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR") and the City of Hermosa Beach, California, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"). R E C I T A L S A. CONTRACTOR submitted the lowest responsible bid and was awarded a contract by the City of Ranchos Palos Verdes for the installation of connector pipe screen (CPS) units citywide; and B. CONTRACTOR has agreed to extend the same unit pricing to Hermosa Beach for the same work; and C. On July 28, 2020, City’s City Council determined that formal bidding of the project was not in the public interest because it would not yield a better price than the price being proposed by CONTRACTOR following its recent award of contract in Rancho Palos Verdes, because CONTRACTOR has a proven track record having performed identical work for Hermosa Beach in 2019, and because no other purpose served by formal bidding would be advanced by engaging in the formal bid process; D. The City Council determined to waive the formal bidding process and authorized the Mayor to execute a written contract with CONTRACTOR for furnishing labor, equipment and material for the project to install 192 CPS Units in the City of Hermosa Beach NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed: 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: CITY agrees to engage CONTRACTOR and CONTRACTOR agrees to furnish all necessary labor, tools, materials, appliances, and equipment for and do the work for the CIP Project No. 419, Storm Drain Pipe Screens, in the City of Hermosa Beach. The work shall be performed in accordance with the Plans and Specifications, (the “Specifications”) on file in the office of the City Clerk and in accordance with bid prices set forth in CONTRACTOR’S Bid Proposal and in accordance with the instructions of the City Engineer. 2. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLEMENTARY: The contract documents for the aforesaid project shall consist of the Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Bid Proposal, Builders General Provisions, Standard Specifications, Special Provisions, Exhibit A and Exhibit B, and all referenced specifications, details, standard drawings, and appendices; together with this Agreement and all required bonds, insurance certificates, permits, notices and affidavits; and also, including any and all addenda or supplemental agreements clarifying, amending, or extending the work contemplated as may be required to insure its completion in an acceptable manner. All of the provisions of said contract documents are made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. This contract is intended to require a complete and finished piece of work and anything necessary to complete the work properly and in accordance with the law and lawful governmental regulations shall be performed by 633 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 2 of 15 CONTRACTOR whether set out specifically in the contract or not. Should it be ascertained that any inconsistency exists between the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, the provisions of this Agreement, the Builders General Provisions and the Standard Specifications, in that order, shall control. Collectively, these contract documents constitute the complete agreement between CITY and CONTRACTOR and supersede any previous agreements or understandings. COMPENSATION: CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in its Proposal (Eighty-Eight Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Three Dollars; $88,563) as full compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work, and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Said compensation shall cover all expenses, losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of the work during its progress or prior to its acceptance including those for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the aforesaid contract documents; and also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the work, suspension or discontinuance of the work, and all other unknowns or risks of any description connected with the work. 3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE: CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work within Thirsty (30) working days from the date of the notice to proceed. By signing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR represents to CITY that the contract time is reasonable for completion of the work and that CONTRACTOR will complete such work within the contract time. 4. PREVAILING WAGES AND CALIFORNIA LABOR LAWS. A. Pursuant to Labor Code §§ 1720 et seq., and as specified in 8 California Code of Regulations § 16000 (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), CONTRACTOR must pay its workers prevailing wages. It is CONTRACTOR’s responsibility to interpret and implement any prevailing wage requirements, and CONTRACTOR agrees to pay any penalty or civil damages resulting from a violation of the prevailing wage laws. CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. CONTRACTOR and any subcontractor shall forfeit a penalty of up to $200 per calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid less than the prevailing wage rates. B. In accordance with Labor Code § 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are available upon request from CITY’s Engineering Division or the website for State of California Prevailing wage determination at http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR/PWD. CONTRACTOR must post a copy of the prevailing rate of per diem wages at the job site. C. CITY directs CONTRACTOR’s attention to Labor Code §§ 1777.5, 1777.6 and 3098 concerning the employment of apprentices by CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor. 634 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 3 of 15 D. Labor Code § 1777.5 requires CONTRACTOR or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeship occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate must also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases will not be less than one to five except: i. When employment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days before the request for certificate, or ii. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or iii. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis state-wide or locally, or iv. Assignment of an apprentice to any work performed under a public works contract would create a condition that would jeopardize his or her life or the life, safety, or property of fellow employees or the public at large, or the specific task to which the apprentice is to be assigned is of a nature that training cannot be provided by a journeyman. v. When CONTRACTOR provides evidence that CONTRACTOR employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. vi. CONTRACTOR is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if CONTRACTOR employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. vii. CONTRACTOR and any subcontractor must comply with Labor Code §§ 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. viii. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. ix. The CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor that is determined by the Labor Commissioner to have knowingly violated Section 1777.5 shall forfeit as a civil penalty an amount not exceeding $100 for each full calendar day of noncompliance, or such greater amount as provided by law. 635 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 4 of 15 E. CONTRACTOR and each subcontractor shall keep an accurate payroll record, showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by him or her in connection with the public work. The payroll records shall be certified and shall be available for inspection at all reasonable hours at the principal office of CONTRACTOR in the manner provided in Labor Code section 1776. In the event of noncompliance with the requirements of this section, CONTRACTOR shall have 10 days in which to comply subsequent to receipt of written notice specifying in what respects such CONTRACTOR must comply with this section. Should noncompliance still be evident after such 10 -day period, CONTRACTOR shall, as a penalty to CITY, forfeit not more than $100.00 for each calendar day or portion thereof, for each worker, until strict compliance is effectuated. The amount of the forfeiture is to be determined by the Labor Commissioner. A contractor who is found to have violated the provisions of law regarding wages on Public Works with the intent to defraud shall be ineligible to bid on Public Works contracts for a period of one to three years as determined by the Labor Commissioner. Upon the request of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards or the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, such penalties shall be withheld from progress payments then due. The responsibility for compliance with this section is on CONTRACTOR. The requirement to submit certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Section 1771.4. F. Any ineligible contractor or subcontractor pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1777.1 and 1777.7 may not perform work on this Project. G. By executing this Contract, CONTRACTOR verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time, and shall require all subcontractors and sub-subcontractors to comply with the same. 5. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK: Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract, and CONTRACTOR and any subcontractor under it shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. CONTRACTOR shall forfeit, as a penalty to City, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under it, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which the laborer, worker or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day or 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the Labor Code. 636 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 5 of 15 6. PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION: Pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, all contractors and subcontractors that wish to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, or enter into a contract to perform public work must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). No bid will be accepted nor any contract entered into without proof of the contractor’s and subcontractors’ current registration with the DIR to perform public work. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1. 7. LABOR COMPLIANCE AND STOP ORDERS: This Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. It shall be CONTRACTOR’s sole responsibility to evaluate and pay the cost of complying with all labor compliance requirements under this Contract and applicable law. Any stop orders issued by the DIR against CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor that affect CONTRACTOR’s performance of Work, including any delay, shall be CONTRACTOR’s sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered CONTRACTOR caused delay subject to any applicable liquidated damages and shall not be compensable by the CITY. CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold CITY, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the DIR against CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor. 8. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: CONTRACTOR agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each worker needed to execute the work required by this Agreement as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. 9. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY: The City of Hermosa Beach and its officers, agents and employees ("Indemnitees") shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, or for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work; or for injury or damage to any person or persons, either workers or employees of CONTRACTOR, of its subcontractors or the public, or for damage to adjoining or other property from any cause whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the performance of the work. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any damage or injury to any person or property resulting from defects or obstructions or from any cause whatsoever. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONTRACTOR will indemnify Indemnities against and will hold and save Indemnitees harmless from any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of CONTRACTOR, its agents, employees, subcontractors or invitees provided for herein, whether or not there is concurrent passive negligence on the part of City. In connection therewith: a. CONTRACTOR will defend an y action or actions filed in connection with any such claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees, expert fees and costs incurred in connection therewith. 637 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 6 of 15 b. CONTRACTOR will promptly pay any judgment rendered against CONTRACTOR or Indemnitees covering such claims, damages, penalties, obligations and liabilities arising out of or in connection with such work, operations or activities of CONTRACTOR hereunder, and CONTRACTOR agrees to save and hold the Indemnitees harmless therefrom. c. In the event Indemnitees are made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against CONTRACTOR for damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the work, operation or activities hereunder, CONTRACTOR agrees to pay to Indemnitees and any all costs and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in such action or proceeding together with reasonable attorneys' fees. Contractor's obligations under this section apply regardless of whether or not such claim, charge, damage, demand, action, proceeding, loss, stop notice, cost, expense, judgment, civil fine or penalty, or liability was caused in part or contributed to by an Indemnitee. However, without affecting the rights of City under any provision of this agreement, to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782, Contractor shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City for liability attributable to the active negligence of City, provided such active negligence is determined by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. In instances where City is shown to have been actively negligent and where City active negligence accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the obligation of Contractor will be for that entire portion or percentage of liability not attributable to the active negligence of City. So much of the money due to CONTRACTOR under and by virtue of the contract as shall be considered necessary by City may be retained by City until disposition has been made of such actions or claims for damages as aforesaid. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California. This indemnity provision shall survive the termination of the Agreement and is in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicabili ty of any insurance coverage which may have been required under this Agreement or any additional insured endorsements which may extend to Indemnitees. CONTRACTOR, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising our of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent passive negligence by the Indemnitees. 10. THIRD PARTY CLAIMS. In accordance with Public Contract Code § 9201, CITY will promptly inform CONTRACTOR regarding third-party claims against CONTRACTOR, 638 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 7 of 15 but in no event later than ten (10) business days after CITY receives such claims. Such notification will be in writing and forwarded in accordance with the “Notice” section of this Agreement. As more specifically detailed in the contract documents, CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify and defend the City against any third-party claim. 11. WORKERS COMPENSATION: In accordance with California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700, CONTRACTOR and each of its subcontractors will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, CONTRACTOR, by signing this contract, certifies as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract. 12. INSURANCE: With respect to performance o f work under this contract, CONTRACTOR shall maintain and shall require all of its subcontractors to maintain insurance as required in the Builders General Provisions. 13. ASSIGNMENT: This contract is not assignable nor the performance of either party's duties delegable without the prior written consent of the other party. Any attempted or purported assignment or delegation of any of the rights of obligations of either party without the prior written consent of the other shall be void and of no force and effect. 13. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: CONTRACTOR is and shall at all times remain as to the CITY, a wholly independent contractor. Neither the CITY nor any of its agents shall have control of the conduct of CONTRACTOR or any of CONTRACTOR'S employees, except as herein set forth. CONTRACTOR shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of CITY. 14. TAXES: CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying all retail sales and use, transportation, export, import, special or other taxes and duties applicable to, and assessable against any work, materials, equipment, services, processes and operations incidental to or involved in this contract. CONTRACTOR is responsible for ascertaining and arranging to pay them. The prices established in the contract shall include compensation for any taxes CONTRACTOR is required to pay by laws and regulations in effect at the bid opening date. 15. LICENSES: CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to CITY that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of CONTRACTOR to practice its profession. CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to CITY that CONTRACTOR shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, insurance, and approvals which are legally required of CONTRACTOR to practice its profession. CONTRACTOR shall maintain a City of Hermosa Beach business license, if required under CITY ordinance. 639 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 8 of 15 Contractors are required by law to be licensed and regulated by the Contractors’ State License Board which has jurisdiction to investigate complaints against contractors if a complaint regarding a patent act or omission is filed within four (4) years of the date of the alleged violation. A complaint regarding a latent act or omission pertaining to structural defects must be filed within ten (10) years of the date of the alleged violation. Any questions concerning a contractor may be referred to the Registrar, Contractors’ State License Board, P.O. Box 26000, Sacramento, California 95826. 16. RECORDS: CONTRACTOR shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property, and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Agreement and such other records as may be deemed necessary by CITY or any authorized representative, and will be retained for four years after the expiration of this Agreement. All such records shall be made available for inspection or audit by CITY at any time during regular business hours. 17. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of these contract documents are declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and, as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect. 18. WHOLE AGREEMENT: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements either oral or written, between the parties and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties pertaining to the work of improvements described herein. Each party to this contract acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that any other agreement, statements or promise not contained in this contract shall not be valid or binding. Any modifications of this contract will be effective only if signed by the party to be charged. 17. AUTHORITY: CONTRACTOR affirms that the signatures, titles, and seals set forth hereinafter in execution of this Agreement represent all individuals, firm members, partners, joint ventures, and/or corporate officers having a principal interest herein. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment. CITY’s city manager may execute any such amendment on CITY’s behalf. 18. NOTICES: All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be in writing, and shall be deemed made when delivered to the applicable party’s representative as provided in this Agreement. Additionally, such notices may be given to the respective parties at the following addresses, or at such other addresses as the parties may provide in writing for this purpose. Such notices shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. mail, first-class postage prepaid, and addressed to the party at its applicable address. 640 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 9 of 15 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attention: Romany Basilyous, Project Supervisor CONTRACTOR: United Storm Water, Inc. 14000 E. Valley Blvd. City of Industry, CA, 91746 _________________ Attention: Ramon Menjivar _________________ 19 DISPUTES. Effective January 1, 1991, Section 20104 et seq., of the California Public Contract Code prescribes a process utilizing informal conferences, non-binding judicial supervised mediation, and judicial arbitration to resolve disputes on construction claims of $375,000 or less. Effective January 1, 2017, Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code prescribes a process for negotiation and mediation to resolve disputes on construction claims. The intent of this Section is to implement Sections 20104 et seq. and Section 920 4 of the California Public Contract Code. This Section shall be construed to be consistent with said statutes. Claims. For purposes of this Section, “Claim” means a separate demand by CONTRACTOR, after a change order duly requested in accordance with the terms of this Contract has been denied by the CITY, for (A) a time extension, (B) payment of money or damages arising from Work done by or on behalf of CONTRACTOR pursuant to the Contract, or (C) an amount the payment of which is disputed by the CITY. A “Claim” does not include any demand for payment for which CONTRACTOR has failed to provide notice, request a change order, or otherwise failed to follow any procedures contained in the Contract Documents. Claims governed by this Section may not be filed unless and until CONTRACTOR completes all procedures for giving notice of delay or change and for the requesting of a time extension or change order, including but not necessarily limited to the change order procedures contained herein, and CONTRACTOR’s request for a change has been denied in whole or in part. Claims governed by this Section must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after a request for change has been denied in whole or in part or after any other event giving rise to the Claim. The Claim shall be submitted in writing to the CITY and shall include on its first page the following in 16 point capital font: “THIS IS A CLAIM.” Furthermore, the claim shall include the documents necessary to substantiate the claim. Nothing in this Section is intended to extend the time limit or supersede notice requirements otherwise provided by contract for the filing of claims, including all requirements pertaining to compensation or payment for extra Work, disputed Work, and/or changed conditions. Failure to follow such contractual requirements shall bar any claims or subsequent lawsuits for compensation or payment thereon. Supporting Documentation. The CONTRACTOR shall submit all claims in the following format: Summary of claim merit and price, reference Contract Document provisions pursuant to which the claim is made List of documents relating to claim: 641 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 10 of 15 Specifications Drawings Clarifications (Requests for Information) Schedules Other Chronology of events and correspondence Analysis of claim merit Analysis of claim cost Time impact analysis in CPM format If CONTRACTOR’s claim is based in whole or in part on an allegation of errors or omissions in the Drawings or Specifications for the Project, CONTRACTOR shall provide a summary of the percentage of the claim subject to design errors or omissions and shall obtain a certificate of merit in support of the claim of design errors and omissions. Cover letter and certification of validity of the claim, including any claims from subcontractors of any tier, in accordance with Government Code section 12650 et seq. City’s Response. Upon receipt of a claim pursuant to this Section, CITY shall conduct a reasonable review of the claim and, within a period not to exceed 45 days, shall provide CONTRACTOR a written statement identifying what portion of the claim is disputed and what portion is undisputed. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim will be processed and made within 60 days after the public entity issues its written statement. If CITY needs approval from its governing body to provide the CONTRACTOR a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion of the claim, and the governing body does not meet within the 45 days or within the mutually agreed to extension of time following receipt of a claim sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, CITY shall have up to three days following the next duly publicly noticed meeting of the governing body after the 45-day period, or extension, expires to provide CONTRACTOR a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion. Within 30 days of receipt of a claim, CITY may request in writing additional documentation supporting the claim or relating to defenses or claims CITY may have against the CONTRACTOR. If additional information is thereafter required, it shall be requested and provided pursuant to this subdivision, upon mutual agreement of CITY and the CONTRACTOR. CITY’s written response to the claim, as further documented, shall be submitted to CONTRACTOR within 30 days (if the claim is less than $50,000, within 15 days) after receipt of the further documentation, or within a period of time no greater than that taken by CONTRACTOR in producing the additional information or requested documentation, whichever is greater. 642 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 11 of 15 Meet and Confer. If the CONTRACTOR disputes CITY’s written response, or CITY fails to respond within the time prescribed, the CONTRACTOR may so notify CITY, in writing, either within 15 days of receipt of CITY’s response or within 15 days of CITY’s failure to respond within the time prescribed, respectively, and demand an informal conference to meet and confer for settlement of the issues in dispute. Upon receipt of a demand, CITY shall schedule a meet and confer conference within 30 days for settlement of the dispute. Mediation. Within 10 business days following the conclusion of the meet and confer conference, if the claim or any portion of the claim remains in dispute, CITY shall provide the CONTRACTOR a written statement identifying the portion of the claim that remains in dispute and the portion that is undisputed. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim shall be processed and made within 60 days after CITY issues its written statement. Any disputed portion of the claim, as identified by CONTRACTOR in writing, shall be submitted to nonbinding mediation, with CITY and CONTRACTOR sharing the associated costs equally. CITY and CONTRACTOR shall mutually agree to a mediator within 10 business days after the disputed portion of the claim has been identified in writing, unless the parties agree to select a mediator at a later time. If the Parties cannot agree upon a mediator, each Party shall select a mediator and those mediators shall select a qualified neutral third party to mediate with regard to the disputed portion of the claim. Each Party shall bear the fees and costs charged by its respective mediator in connection with the selection of the neutral mediator. For purposes of this section, mediation includes any nonbinding process, including, but not limited to, neutral evaluation or a dispute review board, in which an independent third party or board assists the Parties in dispute resolution through negotiation or by issuance of an evaluation. Any mediation utilized shall conform to the timeframes in this section. Unless otherwise agreed to by CITY and CONTRACTOR in writing, the mediation conducted pursuant to this section shall excuse any further obligation under Section 20104.4 to mediate after litigation has been commenced. The mediation shall be held no earlier than the date CONTRACTOR completes the Work or the date that CONTRACTOR last performs Work, whichever is earlier. All unresolved claims shall be considered jointly in a single mediation, unless a new unrelated claim arises after mediation is completed. Procedures After Mediation. If following the mediation, the claim or any portion remains in dispute, CONTRACTOR must file a claim pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 900) and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 910) of Part 3 of Division 3.6 of Title 1 of the Government Code. For purposes of those provisions, the running of the period of time within which a claim must be filed shall be tolled from the time CONTRACTOR submits his or her written claim pursuant to subdivision (a) until the time the claim is denied, including any period of time utilized by the meet and confer conference or mediation. Civil Actions. The following procedures are established for all civil actions filed to reso lve claims subject to this Section: 643 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 12 of 15 Within 60 days, but no earlier than 30 days, following the filing or responsive pleadings, the court shall submit the matter to non-binding mediation unless waived by mutual stipulation of both parties or unless mediation was held prior to commencement of the action in accordance with Public Contract Code section 9204 and the terms of these procedures.. The mediation process shall provide for the selection within 15 days by both parties of a disinterested third person as mediator, shall be commenced within 30 days of the submittal, and shall be concluded within 15 days from the commencement of the mediation unless a time requirement is extended upon a good cause showing to the court. If the matter remains in dispute, the case shall be submitted to judicial arbitration pursuant to Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 1141.10) of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, notwithstanding Section 1114.11 of that code. The Civil Discovery Act of 1986 (Article 3 (commencing with Section 2016) of Chapter 3 of Title 3 of Part 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure) shall apply to any proceeding brought under this subdivision consistent with the rules pertaining to judicial arbitration. In addition to Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 1141.10) of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (A) arbitrators shall, when possible, be experienced in construction law, and (B) any party appealing an arbitration award who does not obtain a more favorable judgment shall, in addition to payment of costs and fees under that chapter, also pay the attorney’s fees on appeal of the other party. Government Code Claims. In addition to any and all contract requirements pertaining to notices of and requests for compensation or payment for extra work, disputed work, claims and/or changed conditions, CONTRACTOR must comply with the claim procedures set forth in Government Code sections 900 et seq. prior to filing any lawsuit against the CITY. Such Government Code claims and any subsequent lawsuit based upon the Government Code claims shall be limited to those matters that remain unresolved after all procedures pertaining to extra work, disputed work, claims, and/or changed conditions have been followed by CONTRACTOR. If no such Government Code claim is submitted, or if any prerequisite contractual requirements are not otherwise satisfied as specified herein, CONTRACTOR shall be barred from bringing and maintaining a valid lawsuit against the CITY. A Government Code claim must be filed no earlier than the date the work is completed or the date CONTRACTOR last performs work on the Project, whichever occurs first. A Government Code claim shall be inclusive of all unresolved claims unless a new unrelated claim arises after the Government Code claim is submitted. Non-Waiver. CITY’s failure to respond to a claim from CONTRACTOR within the time periods described in this Section or to otherwise meet the time requirements of this Section shall result in the claim being deemed rejected in its entirety. CITY’s failure to respond shall not waive CITY’s rights to any subsequent procedures for the resolution of disputed claims. 20 NON-DISCRIMINATION: Contractor represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. A violation of this 644 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 13 of 15 section exposes CONTRACTOR to the penalties provided for in Labor Code Section 1735. 21 TERMINATION: This Contract may be terminated by CITY at any time, either with our without cause, by giving CONTRACTOR three (3) days advance written notice. In the event of termination by CITY for any reason other than the fault of CONTRACTOR, CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR for all Work performed up to that time as provided herein. In the event of breach of the Contract by Contractor, CITY may terminate the Contract immediately without notice, may reduce payment to CONTRACTOR in the amount necessary to offset CITY’s resulting damages, and may pursue any other available recourse against CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR may not terminate this Contract except for cause. In the event this Contract is terminated in whole or in part as provided, CITY may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. Further, if this Contract is terminated as provided, CITY may require CONTRACTOR to provide all finished or unfinished documents, data, diagrams, drawings, materials or other matter prepared or built by CONTRACTOR in connection with its performance of this Contract 22 ANTI-TRUST CLAIMS: This provision shall be operative if this Contract Agreement is applicable to California Public Contract Code Section 7103.5. In entering into this Contract Agreement to supply goods, services or materials, Contractor hereby offers and agrees to assign to the Agency all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Section 15) or under t he Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, commencing with Section 16700, of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code) arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the Contract Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the Agency tender final payment to Contractor, without further acknowledgment by the Parties. 23 NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY. This Contract and every provision herein is for the exclusive benefit of the Contractor and the City and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of the Contractor’s or the City’s obligations under this Contract. 24 TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of the Contract Documents. 25 FORCE MAJEURE. If CONTRACTOR is delayed in the performance or progress of the work by a Force Majeure Event, then the CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to a time extension, as provided in the contract documents, when the work stopped is on the critical path and shall not be charged liquidated damages. Such a non-compensable adjustment shall be CONTRACTOR’s sole and exclusive remedy for such delays and the CONTRACTOR will not receive an adjustment to the contract price or any other compensation. Contractor must submit a timely request in accordance with the requirements of the contract documents. A Force Majeure Event shall mean an event that materially affects a party’s performance and is one or more of the following: (1) Acts of God or other natural disasters occurring at the project site; (2) terrorism or other acts of a 645 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 14 of 15 public enemy; (3) orders of governmental authorities (including, without limitation, unreasonable and unforeseeable delay in the issuance of permits or approvals by governmental authorities that are required for the work); (4) pandemics, epidemics or quarantine restrictions; and (5) strikes and other organized labor action occurring at the project site and the effects thereof on the work, only to the extent such strikes and other organized labor action are beyond the control of CONTRACTOR and its subcontractors, of every tier, and to the extent the effects thereof cannot be avoided by use of replacement workers. For purposes of this section, “orders of governmental authorities,” includes ordinances, emergency proclamations and orders, rules to protect the public health, welfare and safety, and other actions of the City in its capacity as a municipal authority. 26 ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Contract, agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission. Such facsimile signature will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. 27 GOVERNING LAW: This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this Contract will be in Los Angeles County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement with all the formalities required by law on the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures. State of California CONTRACTOR'S License No. __ CONTRACTOR _________________ By: ____________________________________________ Date TITLE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA _________________ By: ____________________________________________ Date MAYOR ATTEST: By: ____________________________________________ Date CITY CLERK 646 65270.00001\32595443.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Page 15 of 15 CONTRACTOR'S Business Phone Emergency Phone at which CONTRACTOR can be reached at any time: ( ) APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________________________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY __________________ Date 647 City of Hermosa Beach Staff Report City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Staff Report REPORT 20-0409 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting of July 28, 2020 AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS TO PROVIDE ON-CALL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (Public Works Director Marnell Gibson) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1.Award a Professional Services Agreement to Koury Engineering &Testing Inc.,MTGL Inc.and to Smith Emery Laboratories Inc.,for an amount not to exceed $300,000 each,to provide on- call Geotechnical services to the City of Hermosa Beach for three years with the option to extend for up to two additional one-year terms; and 2.Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the Professional Services Agreement(s) subject to approval by the City Attorney. Executive Summary: The City has traditionally relied on Requests for Proposals (RFP)to fulfill the Geotechnical service needs of the City.In light of the City’s desire to be nimble and efficient in its business processes,staff recognized the opportunity to re-envision the City’s approach to the provision of these services.Staff from the Public Works Department collaborated on the development of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) that meets the geotechnical service needs of the City and the community. A Request for Qualifications for On-Call Geotechnical Services was issued on January 27,2020.As of the proposal deadline of February 18,2020,a total of seven proposals were received.Staff reviewed the seven proposals and recommends that the City Council award a series of not-to-exceed contracts to three qualified professional consulting firms to provide on-call Geotechnical services as needed to the City for an amount not to exceed of $300,000 each over the next three years,with options to extend the contract length for up to two additional one-year terms. Background: The City has a longstanding practice of hiring consultants based on Requests for Proposals to fulfill its Geotechnical service needs.The RFP process consumes a significant amount of time as staff engages in the RFP initiation,bidding,evaluating,award,and execution process each time the City needs geotechnical services.Each RFP issued takes months to process,from drafting the RFP to execution of award.Given the aim toward implementation of business process improvements,staffCity of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™648 Staff Report REPORT 20-0409 execution of award.Given the aim toward implementation of business process improvements,staff seized the opportunity to re-envision the City’s approach to obtaining these services. A team from Public Works collaborated on the development of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ)to meet the needs of the City and the community.The RFQ approach,which includes a formal competitive bidding and advertisement process,provides the City with a list of pre-qualified professional consultants to serve on the “bench”for the coming three to five years without the need to go out for an RFP each time the service is needed.This approach improves efficiency and expedites commencement of work and project delivery. Discussion: RFQ 20-01 was issued on Jaunary 27,2020,seeking proposals from qualified individuals or firms to provide on-call geotechnical services to support the function and needs of the City’s Public Works Department (Attachment 1).In order to provide context of the City’s needs,the RFQ included key statistics about the City’s infrastructure.The RFQ also included the City’s goals and expectations for community engagement related to the City’s infrastructure.The requested services for this RFQ included, but not limited to the following: 1.Prepare various soils investigations,geotechnical,and environmental remediation reports which pertain to development and capital improvement projects; 2.Perform pavement testing, analysis and compaction testing; and 3.Collect concrete samples and conduct strength testing. On February 18,2020,the City received a total of seven proposals.The complete list of firms that submitted proposals is provided in Table 1 below. Table 1 #Firm Title 1 ATLAS United Heider 2 Converse Consultants 3 Koury Engineering Inc. 4 MTGL Inc. 5 NV5 Inc. 6 RMA Group 7 Smith Emery Laboratories Inc. Staff from the Public Works Department reviewed and evaluated each proposal based on the criteria established in the RRQ: ·Approach and Methods ·Relevant Experience & Expertise ·Timeframe and Costs City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™649 Staff Report REPORT 20-0409 ·Administration Based on staff’s review of the proposals,three of the seven firms were selected based on their overall approach and experience, and specific technical approach to each requested service. Based on the review of proposals,the reviewing panel recommends that City Council award a series of not-to-exceed contracts to a total of three firms.The proposals submitted by each of the recommended firms are provided in Attachment 2.The recommended firms are noted in Table 2 below. Table 2 #Firm Title 1 Koury Engineering, Inc. 2 MTGL Inc. 3 Smith Emery Laboratories, Inc. General Plan Consistency: This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below: Mobility Element Goal 1.Complete Streets that serve the diverse functions of mobility commerce,recreation, and community engagement for all users whether they travel by walking,bicycling,transit,or driving. Policy: ·1.3 Monitor best practices.Consider applying the latest standards of best practices in the design,operation,and maintenance of the transportation network that is both attractive and functional. Infrastructure Element Goal 1. Infrastructure systems are functional, safe, and well maintained. Policies ·1.1 Infrastructure systems plan.Establish and adopt an integrated,holistic systems approach to guide infrastructure development, improvement, maintenance, and resilience. ·1.3 Right-of-way coordination.Ensure infrastructure maintenance and repair projects within the public right-of-way are coordinated with utilities and agencies to minimize additional roadway repaving or accelerated deterioration. City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™650 Staff Report REPORT 20-0409 Goal 2. Roadway infrastructure maintenance supports convenient, attractive, and complete streets and associated amenities. Policies ·2.1 Preventive street maintenance.Maintain streets,sidewalks and other public rights-of- way to provide a reliable network for circulation through a proactive preventive maintenance program. ·2.5 Active transportation dedications.Require new development and redevelopment projects to provide land or infrastructure necessary to accommodate active transportation, such as widened sidewalks,bike racks,and bus stops,in compliance with ADA accessibility standards. Fiscal Impact: Each agreement would be a not-to-exceed contract amount of $300,000. Geotechnical service costs are included in each CIP Project budget and would be determined as proposals for individual projects are received. In most cases, the Geotechnical portion of a project does not exceed five percent of the overall project cost. Staff does not anticipate additional funding needs for these contracts. Attachments: 1.RFQ 20-01: On Call Geotechnical Services Proposals from Recommended Consultant Teams 2.Proposal - Koury, Inc. 3.Proposal - MTGL, Inc. 4.Proposal - Smith Emery Laboratories, Inc. 5.Fee Schedule - Koury, Inc. 6.Fee Schedule - MTGL, Inc. 7.Fee Schedule - Smith Emery Laboratories, Inc. 8.Fees Schedule Table 9.Draft agreement - Koury, Inc. 10.Draft agreement - MTGL, Inc. 11.Draft Agreement - Smith Emery Laboratories, Inc. Respectfully Submitted by: Romany Basilyous, Associate Engineer Concur: Lucho Rodriguez, Deputy City Engineer Concur: Marnell Gibson, Public Works Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Charlotte Newkirk, Accounting Manager Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Printed on 11/30/2023Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™651 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 20-01 ON-CALL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Department of Public Works 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0210 Page of 1 34 652 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach BID NUMBER: RFQ# - 20-01 BID TITLE: ON-CALL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: Public Works – Engineering Division RELEASE DATE: January 27, 2020 DUE DATE: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 @ 5:00 p.m. PST Notice is hereby given that the Department of Public Works of the City of Hermosa Beach will receive proposals. Each proposal must be submitted in a sealed envelope and clearly marked: “RFQ# 20-01, On-Call Geotechnical Services” Failure to identify the proposal on the envelope may result in disqualification of the proposal. Sealed proposals must be submitted to the City Clerk Office at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA, 90254. Proposals will be received until 5:00 p.m. PST, Tuesday, February 18, 2020. Proposals will not be opened at that time, but will be submitted to the Public Works Department for verification and compliance with Specifications and subsequent recommendation to City Council for award of a contract or rejection of the responses, as deemed appropriate. The City reserves the right to make no award. Proposals received after the deadline will be considered late. Such proposals may be returned unopened. Faxed or emailed proposals are not acceptable. Please direct any inquiries regarding this RFQ to Romany Basilyous, Associate Engineer at rbasilyous@hermosabch.org, by no later than 5:00 PM PST, Tuesday, February 11, 2020. Dated: This 27th Day of January, 2020 Page of 2 34 www.hermosabch.org CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA, 90254 Phone: (310) 318-0210, FAX: (310) 937-5015 653 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 ........................................................................................................................................... 1.1 Invitation for Proposals 4 ..................................................................................................................... 1.2 RFQ Timeline 4 .................................................................................................................................... 1.3 Submittal Procedures 4 ....................................................................................................................... 1.4 Contact 5 ............................................................................................................................................. 1.5 General RFQ Conditions 5 ................................................................................................................. 2. Scope of Work 9 ...................................................................................................................................... 2.1 City Location and Characteristics 9 ................................................................................................. 2.2 Project Goals 9 .................................................................................................................................... 2.3 Relevant Plans, Policies, Programs, or Projects 9 ............................................................................. 2.4 City Proposed Scope of Services 10 ................................................................................................. 3. Proposal Submittal Instructions 13 ......................................................................................................... 3.1 Proposal Format 13 ............................................................................................................................. 3.1.1 Hard Copy Proposals 13 .............................................................................................................. 3.2 Proposal Content 13 ........................................................................................................................... 3.2.1 Cover Letter 13 ............................................................................................................................. 3.2.2 Firm Profile 14 ................................................................................................................................ 3.2.3 Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work 14 .................................................. 3.2.4 Project Management Plan 15 ..................................................................................................... 3.2.5 Experience and Qualifications 15 .............................................................................................. 3.2.6 Required Forms 17 ........................................................................................................................ 3.2.7 Fee Schedule 17 ........................................................................................................................... 4. Proposal Evaluation and Selection 18 ................................................................................................... 4.1 Proposal Review Process 18 ............................................................................................................... 4.2 Evaluation Criteria 18 .......................................................................................................................... 5. Contract Expectations 20 ....................................................................................................................... 5.1 Contract Period 20 .............................................................................................................................. 5.2 Professional Services Agreement 20 ................................................................................................. 5.3 Standards of Work 20 .......................................................................................................................... 5.4 Invoicing and Payment 20 ................................................................................................................. 6. Attachments and Required Forms 21 .................................................................................................... 6.1 Maps 21 ................................................................................................................................................ 6.1.1 City Map 21 ................................................................................................................................... 6.2 Sample Professional Services Agreement 22 ................................................................................... 6.3 Required Forms 31 ............................................................................................................................... 6.3.1 Certification of Proposal 31 ......................................................................................................... 6.3.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit 32 ........................................................................................................... 6.3.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements 33 .......................................................................... 6.3.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement 34................................................... Page of 3 34 654 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 1 Introduction 1.1 Invitation for Proposals That the City of Hermosa Beach, Public Works Department is seeking Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) from qualified individuals or firms to provide On Call Geotechnical Services for the City of Hermosa Beach. Proposer(s) must have the expertise, experience, and demonstrate resources available to perform the work described in the RFQ. A copy of this RFQ may be found on the City’s website at the following location: https://www.hermosabeach.gov/our- government/city-clerk/bids-and-proposals or by emailing the contact person listed below. Should an award be made, the selected Consultant(s) will enter into a professional services agreement with the City of Hermosa Beach to provide these services. The City anticipates a contract start date around April 1, 2020 and term of the agreement(s) shall be for two (2) years, with up to three (3) one (1) year extensions. Approximately 30 days prior to the end of each term, a meeting may be held between the consultant(s) and the City of Hermosa Beach staff to conduct a performance review, revise the scope and/or language of the agreement, and confirm consultant rate schedules. The initial agreement and each renewal will require City Council approval. This RFQ does not require consultants to address any specific projects or task orders. As actual projects arise, the City will solicit proposals from the selected on-call firms. A task order will be negotiated and executed between the City and the selected firm. 1.2 RFQ Timeline 1.3 Submittal Procedures Proposers shall submit one original and four copies in a sealed envelope or box bearing the name of the Proposer, marked RFQ # 20-01, submitted only to the following address: ON-CALL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (RFQ 20-01) City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk Office Attn: Romany Basilyous 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach CA, 90254 RFQ posted January 27, 2020 Deadline to submit written questions February 11, 2020 Posting of responses to questions February 13, 2020 Deadline to submit proposals February 18, 2020 - 5 PM PST Interviews (for selected firms)TBD Tentative award April, 2020 Page of 4 34 655 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach Proposes shall submit one digital copy of the proposal in a USB drive and one digital copy of the fee schedule in another USB drive. No proposals will be accepted after the listed date and time. All proposals must be clearly marked with the project title and RFQ number and submitted to the City Clerk Office of City of Hermosa Beach. Failure to identify the proposal on the envelope may result in disqualification of the proposal. The format, content, and procedures for submitting a proposal are provided in further detail within the RFQ. (Check Section 3 for complete submittal procedures) 1.4 Contact Please direct any inquiries regarding this RFQ to Romany Basilyous at rbasilyous@hermosabch.org. All questions regarding the content of the proposal should be submitted in writing to the listed email address and sent no later than the date and time listed in the RFQ Timeline. Responses to questions will be distributed to registered holders of this RFQ and posted to the City website. 1.5 General RFQ Conditions The following instructions and conditions apply to this RFQ: Pre-Contractual Expenses The City of Hermosa Beach shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by any consultant. In addition, no consultant shall include any such expenses as part of the price proposed. Pre-contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by bidders in: •Preparing a proposal in response to this RFQ. •Submitting that proposal to the City of Hermosa Beach. •Negotiating with the City of Hermosa Beach any matter related to this RFQ, proposal, and/or contractual agreement. •Any other expenses incurred by the consultant prior to the date of an executed contract. Authority to Withdraw RFQ and/or Not Award Contract The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to withdraw this RFQ at any time for any reason without prior notice. Further, the City makes no representations that any agreement will be awarded to any consultant responding to this RFQ. The City expressly reserves the right to reject any and all proposals in response to this RFQ without indicating any reasons for such rejection(s). The release of this RFQ does not obligate or compel the City to enter into a contract or agreement. Authority to Revise RFQ and Request Additional Information The City reserves the rights to amend the RFQ at any time, to determine the successful respondent(s), and to reject any or all Proposals or their components. Should it be necessary for the City to issue addendums to this RFQ during the proposal period, the City will notify the known holders of this RFQ and post addendums to the City website. Proposals shall Page of 5 34 656 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach acknowledge that the consultant is aware of all addendums which have been issued and has incorporated their provisions in their proposal by completing the Certification of Proposal Form. The City reserves the right, to request additional information or clarifications from consultants where it may serve the City’s best interest. Other Conditions •ADDITIONAL SERVICES. The Scope of Work describes the minimum work to be accomplished. Upon final selection of the firm(s), the Scope of Work may be modified and refined during negotiations with the City. Any proposer that provides additional services can include those services in the proposal and list them as additional services. •AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES. Every proposal must be signed by the person or persons legally authorized to bind the consultant to a contract for the execution of the work. Upon request of the City, any agent submitting a proposal on behalf of a consultant shall provide a current power of attorney certifying the agent’s authority to bind the consultant. •AWARD OF PROPOSAL. City reserves the right to negotiate final terms with the selected consultant, if any. Award may be made to the consultant offering the most advantageous proposal after consideration of all criteria. Should the selection criteria be requested, it shall be at the City’s discretion if the criteria is released prior to the final selection being made. •COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. All proposals shall comply with current federal, state, and other laws relative thereto. •CONFLICT OF INTEREST. By signing the Certification of Proposal, the consultant declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Qualifications , consultant declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. •DISQUALIFICATION OF PROPOSER. If there is reason to believe that collusion exists among the consultants, the City may refuse to consider proposals from participants in such collusion. No person, firm, or corporation under the same or different name, shall make, file, or be interested in more than one proposal for the same work unless alternate proposals are called for. Reasonable grounds for believing that any consultant is interested in more than one Proposal for the same work will cause the rejection of all Proposals for the work in which a consultant is interested. Consultants shall submit as part of their Proposal documents the completed Non-Collusion Affidavit. •EXAMINATION OF DOCUMENTS. It is the responsibility of the consultant to carefully and thoroughly examine and be familiar with these RFQ documents, general conditions, all forms, specifications, drawings, plans, and addendums (if any). Consultants shall satisfy themselves as to the character, quantity, and quality of work to be performed and materials, labor, supervision necessary to perform the work as specified by these documents. The failure or neglect of the consultant to examine documents shall in no way relieve the consultant from any obligations with respect to the solicitation for and subsequent contract that may be awarded. The submission of a proposal shall constitute an acknowledgment upon which the City may rely that the consultant has thoroughly examined and is familiar with the RFQ documents. The failure or neglect of a consultant Page of 6 34 657 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach to receive or examine any of the documents shall in no way relieve the consultant from any obligations with respect to the proposal. No claim will be allowed for additional compensation that is based upon a lack of knowledge of any solicitation document. •INTERPRETATION OF RFQ DOCUMENTS. City reserves the right to make corrections or clarifications of the information provided in this RFQ. If any person is in doubt as to the true meaning of any part of this RFQ documents, or finds discrepancies or omissions in the document, the person may submit to the City a written request for an interpretation or correction. Oral statement(s), interpretations or clarifications concerning meaning or intent of the contents of this RFQ by any person are unauthorized and invalid. Modifications to the RFQ, including, but not limited to the scope of work, can be made only by written addendum issued by the City. Proposers shall submit all questions in writing to the contact listed in the announcement. Proposers may not contact any other staff members with questions. The requesting party is responsible for prompt delivery of any requests. When the City considers interpretations necessary, interpretations will be in the form of an addendum to the RFQ documents, and when issued, will be sent as promptly as is practical to all parties recorded by the City as having received RFQ documents. All such addenda shall become a part of the RFQ document. It is the responsibility of each consultant to ensure the City has their correct business name, mailing address and e-mail address on file. Any prospective consultants who obtained a set of RFQ documents are responsible for advising the City that they have a set of RFQ documents and wish to receive subsequent Addendums by contacting the City contact person listed in this RFQ. •IRREGULARITIES. City reserves the right to waive non-material irregularities if such would be in the best interest of the City as determined by the City Manager. •NON-DISCRIMINATION. Consultant represents and warrants that it does not and will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, gender, color, national origin, sexual orientation, ancestry, marital status, physical condition, pregnancy or pregnancy-related condition, political affiliation or opinion, age or medical condition. •NON-EXCLUSIVE. Should the City make an award, the successful consultant will enter into a NON-EXCLUSIVE professional services agreement and the City reserves the right to enter into agreements with other firms. •OFFERS OF MORE THAN ONE PRICE. Consultants are NOT allowed to submit more than one cost proposal. •OWNERSHIP. All data, documents and other products used or developed during the RFQ process become the property of the City upon submission. All bid proposals and documents submitted in response to this RFQ shall become the property of the City and a matter of public record pursuant to Government Code sections 6250 et seq. Proposals should not be marked as confidential or proprietary, and City may refuse to consider a proposal so marked. All Information contained within the proposals will become a matter of public record. It is the responsibility of each bidder to clearly identify any and all information contained within its bid proposal that it considers to be confidential and/or proprietary. To the extent that the City agrees with that designation, such information will be held in confidence whenever possible. All other information will be considered public. •PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. Prior to awarding any work, the selected Consultant will be required to execute a professional services agreement (sample attached) with the City. Any proposed change to the agreement shall be identified in the response to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and shall be subject to the sole approval of the City. The City requires the Consultant to obtain and maintain a policy of professional liability and other insurance as indicated in the agreement. Page of 7 34 658 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach •NO PUBLIC BID PROPOSAL OPENING/PUBLIC RECORDS ACT. Bid proposals shall be opened and its contents secured by City staff to prevent disclosure during the evaluative process and the process of negotiating with competing consultants. Adequate precautions shall be taken to treat each consultant fairly and to insure that information gleaned from competing proposals is not disclosed to other Consultants. Prices and other information concerning the proposals shall not be disclosed until a recommendation for award is made to the awarding authority. •PUBLIC RECORD. All proposals submitted in response to this RFQ will become the property of the City upon submittal and a matter of public record pursuant to applicable law. •REPRESENTATIONS. Consultant understands and acknowledges that the representations made in their submitted proposal are material and important, and will be relied on by the City in evaluation of the proposal. Consultant misrepresentation shall be treated as fraudulent concealment from the City of the facts relating to the proposal. •SEVERABILITY. If any provisions or portion of any provision, of this Request for Qualifications are held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, they shall be severed from the Request for Qualifications and the remaining provisions shall be valid and enforceable. •SUBCONTRACTOR INFORMATION. If the proposal includes the use of sub consultants, consultant must identify specific sub consultants and the specific requirements of this RFQ for which each proposed sub consultant would perform services. All sub consultant for work services must follow all required provisions of the prime contract. •VALIDITY. Proposal must be valid for a period of 90 days from the due date. •WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL. Consultants’ authorized representative may withdraw Proposals only by written request received by this RFQ contact personal before the Proposal Submittal Deadline. •BUSINESS LICENSE. The selected firm(s) must obtain a City of Hermosa Beach Business license and maintain a current certificate of insurance with the City for the duration of the Professional Service Agreement. Page of 8 34 659 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 2. Scope of Work 2.1 City Location and Characteristics The City of Hermosa Beach is located within the southwestern coastal portion of Los Angeles County in what is commonly referred to locally as the “South Bay” area. The City is bounded on the north by the City of Manhattan Beach, on the south by the City of Redondo Beach, on the east by the City of Redondo Beach and the City of Manhattan Beach, and on the west by the Pacific Ocean. The city limits for Hermosa Beach encompass a relatively small land area, approximately 1.4 square miles. Hermosa Beach includes nearly two miles of shoreline and varies in width between one-half mile and approximately one mile inland. Elevations in the City range from sea-level and rise up to 250 feet in elevation. In 2018, the City of Hermosa Beach had an estimated population of 19,673. The City plays host to several major special events held throughout the year and visitors can increase the population to over 100,000 people on an average summer weekend. Hermosa Beach contains: •19 parks that vary in sizes; •Community theatre, historical society museum, senior center, after school programming, and classroom facilities; •Recreation and community center, Museum, Senior center, Restroom facilities; •Civic Center including City Hall, Police Department, Library, and Fire Station; •Parking facilities including a parking structure; •Recreational buildings available for meetings and rentals; •Corporate Yard, and various structures. 2.2 Project Goals The City of Hermosa Beach is seeking proposals from qualified firms to provide Geotechnical Services to achieve the following goals: •Leverage the vision and goals of the recently adopted General Plan and the Community Decision-Making Tool; •Utilize a comprehensive approach to maintain, rehabilitate and improve the City’s infrastructure; •Provide the City with a range of Geotechnical services to meet the City’s capital improvement needs on an as-needed basis. 2.3 Relevant Plans, Policies, Programs, or Projects Proposers should review and consider the work already completed or underway in the development of approach, budget, and schedule. The following links are provided for your convenience: •PLAN Hermosa, the City’s Comprehensive General Plan and Local Coastal Program, adopted August 2017 •PLAN Hermosa Environmental Impact Report, certified August 2017 •Hermosa Beach 2019/20 Capital Improvement Program, adopted June 2018 Page of 9 34 660 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 2.4 City Proposed Scope of Services The Scope of Work shall include, but not be limited to the following tasks: 1.Prepare various soils investigations, geotechnical, engineering geology, and environmental remediation reports which pertain to development and capital improvement projects; 2.Perform pavement testing, analysis and compaction testing; 3.Collect concrete samples and conduct strength testing; 4.Check sub-grade compaction for concrete and asphalt construction; 5.Perform tests for sieve analysis, sand equivalent, and cleanness, as needed; 6.Perform plant inspections at facilities supplying concrete and hot mix asphalt; 7.Provide summary reports of testing results; 8.Perform soil borings, testing and sampling according to Caltrans’ procedures and ASTM standards; 9.Prepare studies for geological hazards studies; 10.Verify that sampling and testing procedures are being performed properly and in accordance with Caltrans procedures; 11.Verify certifications of samplers and testers; 12.Perform split sample tests as necessary; 13.Verify that all testing equipment used for acceptance testing is in good condition and properly calibrated; 14.Verify that all plant inspections are being performed correctly by qualified testers; 15.Perform such other similar and related tasks as may be assigned by the City Engineer; 16.Attend pre-construction meetings and other meetings which may be requested by the City; 17.Readily available as needed for field testing during construction projects; 18.Prepare all documentation required to obtain permits from any and all agencies having jurisdiction of the project area; 19.Coordinate plan check, design topics, permits and any other issues with the City, other Agencies, and all utility companies as required. Act on behalf of the City as the liaison with affected agencies; 20.Respond to bidder inquiries during the bidding process, including preparation of any addenda; 21.Respond to written Requests for Information (RFI) within three (3) working days to provide clarification or resolve discrepancies in the contract documents; 22.Review and approve addenda and clarifications to plans and specifications. Page of 10 34 661 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach Description of Required Services •All reports shall conform to criteria, policies, procedures and standards of Caltrans, APWA and the City, and shall be made available to the City at stages specified in the milestone schedule and upon request. •All original plan sheets, calculations, and reports shall be signed and stamped by the Consultant’s licensed professional Geotechnical engineer in responsible-charge of the project. These signed originals will then become the property of the City. •The Consultant shall be in responsible charge for the accuracy and completeness of the reports, plans, specifications and estimates prepared and shall check all such materials accordingly. The plans will be reviewed by the City for conformity with the requirements of the Agreement. Reviews by the city do NOT include detailed review or checking of design or the accuracy with which such designs are depicted on the plans. The responsibility for accuracy and completeness of such items remains solely that of Consultant. •The Consultant shall have a quality control plan in effect during the entire time work is being performed under the Agreement. The Quality control plan shall establish a process whereby plans are independently checked, corrected and back checked, and all job related correspondence and memoranda dated and received by affected persons and then bound in appropriate job files. •Electronic files for all construction details and calculations shall be submitted at the end of the contract or when requested by the City. •All electronic software developed, databases generated, spreadsheets and intellectual properties developed during the life of the Agreement shall become the property of the City. •Consultant shall carry out the instructions received from the City and shall cooperate with the City and other involved agencies. Final Detail Plans, Specifications, and Estimate The Consultant shall submit the following documents for review and approval: Electronic sets of signed final design plans Electronic copies of signed final specifications Electronic files in its original format and in PDF of all plans, specifications, and estimates Manuals/Standards •Where applicable, Geotechnical services for design of all project improvements shall be compatible and in accordance with the following: •Caltrans Highway Design Manual •Caltrans Standard Plans •Caltrans Standard Specifications Page of 11 34 662 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach •Los Angeles County Hydrology Manual •American Public Works Association Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction American Public Works Association Standard Plans •American Water Works Association City of Hermosa Beach Standard Plans •It will be the responsibility of the Consultant to verify that it has received the latest version or update of these documents. •Plans for the improvements on the State Highway shall be prepared in accordance with Caltrans recommended practice for detailing and scope of work. Caltrans Standard plans shall be utilized where applicable and may be called out on the plans as reference. •Local street improvement and utility plans shall adhere to City of Hermosa Beach Standard Plans and the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. Plans shall be computer drafted in AutoCAD compatible format and shall adhere to the current City of Hermosa Beach Public Works Department CAD standards. •The Consultant’s work will be subject to inspections by representatives of the City, County, State and FHWA. •The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) •Other standards as applicable. Page of 12 34 663 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 3. Proposal Submittal Instructions 3.1 Proposal Format Proposals must be submitted in a sealed envelope or box bearing the name of the consultant, clearly marked, and submitted only to the following address: ON-CALL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (RFQ 20-01) City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk Office Attn: Romany Basilyous 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach CA, 90254 3.1.1 Hard Copy Proposals Proposers shall submit one original and four copies of the proposal for a total of five bound documents. One hard copy of the cost proposal (fee schedule) shall be in a separate sealed envelope, clearly marked “Cost Proposal”. Proposes shall submit one digital copy of the proposal in a USB drive and one digital copy of the fee schedule in another USB drive. If discrepancies are found between the copies, or between the original and copy or copies, the “ORIGINAL” will provide the basis for resolving such discrepancies. If one document is not clearly marked “ORIGINAL", the City reserves the right to use any copy of the proposals as the Original. All proposals shall be submitted on standard 8.5” by 11” paper and printed double-sided. Exhibits may be 11” by 17” paper as needed. Proposers should minimize the use of plastic film/ dividers and other materials that cannot be recycled. All pages should be numbered and identified sequentially by section. Proposals shall be no more than 50 total pages (25 double-sided pieces of paper) inclusive of the cover letter and all required forms. 3.2 Proposal Content Proposals must be concise, but with sufficient detail to allow accurate evaluation and comparative analysis. Proposals should be straightforward and provide "layman" explanations of technical terms that are used. Emphasis should be concentrated on conforming to the RFQ instructions, responding to the RFQ requirements, and on providing a complete and clear description of the offer. Proposals should include the sections as described in greater detail below. Do NOT include marketing brochures or other promotional material not connected with this RFQ. 3.2.1 Cover Letter Proposal must be accompanied by a cover letter, signed by an individual authorized to bind the proposing entity. An unsigned proposal is grounds for rejection. The cover letter should include an introduction of the firm, contact information, summary statement of professional qualifications, and statement of understanding of the scope of work. Page of 13 34 664 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 3.2.2 Firm Profile Proposers should provide a brief profile of the prime consultant and any sub-consultants. Information should include, but is not limited to the following information: •Official name and address. •Name, address, email, and telephone number of the consultant’s primary point of contact. •Type of business entity of consultant (corporation, company, joint venture, etc.). Please enclose a copy of the Joint Venture Agreement if entity is a joint venture. •Federal Employer I.D. Number. •Address, telephone numbers and fax numbers of each of the proposing firm’s locations. •Indication whether firm is totally or partially owned by another business organization (parent company) or individual. •Number of years consultant has been in business under the present business name. •Number of years of experience the consultant has had in providing required, equivalent, or related services. •Any failures or refusals to complete a contract, and explanation. 3.2.3 Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work Proposers should include in this section a statement of project understanding, organizational chart, approach to work program and summary of deliverables, described in greater detail below. Statement of Project Understanding Consultant must include in this section its understanding of the project and understanding of the Scope of Services noted herein. Consultant should be able to articulate a thorough understanding of the State, County and Local requirements, and other industry standards applicable to the project or services to be provided. Organizational Chart Consultant shall include an organizational chart that reflects key staff and roles/responsibilities of each individual assigned to provide services under this Proposal. Any roles or topics in which the proposer anticipates utilizing the expertise of subcontractors should be clearly identified. Approach to Work Program (Required and Optional Tasks) The City is seeking an effective, efficient and creative approach to preparing work products and meeting the City’s goals and timelines. In this section, proposers should include their recommended approach to providing the requested professional services and tasks noted in the Scope of Services in the RFQ. The approach to the work plan shall be of such detail to demonstrate the proposer’s ability to accomplish project objectives. This section should also Page of 14 34 665 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach include proposed approaches and techniques to engagement of community and stakeholders in the process of developing projects. The proposer’s approach should provide detail on both the required and optional tasks identified in the scope of work, as well as any additional tasks or services performed by the proposer. Additional services: Consultant shall provide the City with any additional services that the firm can provide. Roles and Responsibilities for City Staff Proposer should summarize any services NOT provided by their firm that are listed in the Scope of Work. Consultant shall also list any resources, City assistance or other items expected to be provided by City, “Work to be Performed or Provided by the City”. Consultant may additionally itemize those services which are further beneficial but are not noted in the aforementioned paragraphs as requirements. Consultant will title this section as Additional Services. 3.2.4 Project Management Plan Key to a creative, effective, and efficient delivery of projects is close coordination and communication between the City, community, and the selected consultant. In this section, proposers should provide information on scheduling, and describe the firm or project manager’s approach to communications and quality assurance/quality control. Communications Approach Proposers should describe their recommended or preferred approach to project communications between the City and Consultant Team. This should include detail on the frequency of project check-ins, progress updates, and meeting locations (i.e. phone, email, in- person). Communications protocols for coordinating with other City departments, agencies, and the community can be established during individual project kick-offs. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Approach Describe the firm’s QA/QC processes that will be adhered to during the term of the agreement. Describe the Consultant’s method of ensuring that the assigned personnel’s quality of work is high. 3.2.5 Experience and Qualifications Proposers should include in this section a summary of relevant projects, contact information for references, and information about the experience, qualifications, and availability of key personnel, described in greater detail below. Summary of Relevant Projects Proposers should highlight representative projects that are similar in scope to the services requested to demonstrate the firm’s depth of experience and familiarity with similar projects. For each project, please include the following information, at a minimum: •Year started and completed (if relevant) •Contracting Agency + Department •Project Description Page of 15 34 666 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach •Key Personnel Assigned •Contract Value References Consultant must provide at least three (3) references for which consultant has provided services similar in scope as set forth in the RFQ within the last five (5) years. Reference information should include: •Name of agency •Name of agency project manager •Email address and telephone number of contact person •Description of project or services provided Experience and Qualifications of Key Personnel The consultant shall provide resumes indicating the experience and qualifications for the key personnel identified in the organization chart. Consultant shall also include the number and type of additional support personnel who will be providing services. At a minimum, the resume for each team member should include: •Name •Position and Role for This Project •Degrees and Certifications •Professional Memberships/Registrations •Summary of Experience •Work on Representative Project Similar in Scope If sub-consultants are to be used as part of this proposal, a resume of the sub-consultant and relevant experience is to be included in the same format. Assignment of Key Personnel It is the City’s preference to have the key personnel identified in the Organizational Chart remain with the individual project during its duration. In this section, please indicate the availability of key personnel to pursue completion of projects. After contract execution the Consultant should not substitute key personnel (project manager and others listed by name in the proposal) or sub-consultants without prior written approval from the local agency. The consultant must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from the agency prior to use of a different sub-consultant on the contract. The proposed substituted person must be as qualified as the original, and at the same or lower cost for geotechnical types of consultant contracts, the Consultant’s project manager shall have all the necessary credentials to qualify him/her as a project manager for this project. Page of 16 34 667 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach In the event there are proposed changes in key personnel, including sub-consultants, during the term of the agreement that are outside of the consulting firm’s control, the consultant shall prepare a transition plan that is presented to the City’s project manager for review. 3.2.6 Required Forms Consultant shall review, acknowledge and submit the following forms: •Certification of Proposal. Proposer is required to sign and submit the Certification of Proposal including acknowledgement that they have received and considered any addendums issued by the City of Hermosa Beach in connection with this RFQ. (See section 6.3.1) •Non-Collusion Affidavit. Proposer is required to sign and submit the Non-Collusion Affidavit. (See section 6.3.2) •Compliance with Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall demonstrate the willingness and ability to submit proof of the required insurance coverage as set forth in the Sample Professional Services Agreement. (See section 6.3.3) •Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement. Consultant shall demonstrate willingness and ability to comply with the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement and/or indicate any exceptions to the Professional Services Agreement. (See section 6.3.4) 3.2.7 Fee Schedule Printed fee schedule shall be submitted in a separate sealed envelope with the proposal, labeled “Fee Schedule” and indicate the firm’s name. Electronic copies of the fee schedule needs to be submitted in an an USB drive, clearly named “Fee Schedule” provided in a separate, clearly marked “cost proposal” envelope. Consultant should provide the fee schedule for the duration of the agreement to successfully fulfill the Scope of Work detailed in this RFQ. Required and optional tasks should be consistent with the tasks listed in the Scope of Services and be clearly marked in the fee schedule to facilitate consistent comparison of costs between proposals. The Fee Schedule should identify project team members, and hourly billing rates. The fee schedule should also include any direct costs such as travel, equipment, printing/materials. The fee schedule must also state if the proposed hourly rate(s) for key personnel is guaranteed for the term of an agreement (if awarded) or if it is subject to adjustments. If subject to adjustments, consultant must state the frequency of adjustments and how adjustments are determined. Page of 17 34 668 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 4. Proposal Evaluation and Selection 4.1 Proposal Review Process The City will evaluate all proposals received in accordance with the evaluation criteria. The City shall not be obligated to accept the lowest priced fee schedule, but the City may make award(s) in the best interests of the City after all factors are considered, including, but not limited to, the demonstrated competence, experience and professional qualifications of the Proposer. Evaluation scores will not be released until after award of proposal, if one is made. Following the review of RFQs by the City’s team, the City may invite short-listed consultants to be interviewed by a panel of City staff, which may include non-city personnel at the City’s discretion. Discussions may, at the City's option, be conducted with the most qualified Proposers. Discussions may be for the purpose of clarification to assure full understanding of, and responsiveness to the solicitation requirements. Proposers shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and written revision of proposals. In conducting discussions, the City will not disclose information derived from proposals submitted by competing Proposers. The City will verify references of short-listed consultants, which may include persons not listed as references, and this will help inform the City’s decisions. The City will select a consultant to negotiate for the performance of work. In negotiating the contract the City may request modifications to the proposed scope or to the technical team or other elements of the proposal. If negotiations fail, the City will commence negotiations with the next qualified candidate. Work will promptly commence following contract award and satisfaction of contract requirements. 4.2 Evaluation Criteria Evaluation criteria will typically include RFQ understanding, demonstrated expertise, relevant experience, availability of the firm’s team, and other factors. Task orders resulting from this contract will be negotiated and executed between the City and the selected firm. Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of their response to all provisions of this RFQ. The City of Hermosa Beach will use the following criteria in its evaluation of proposals, interviews with selected consultants, or verification of references. The categories will be weighted approximately as follows. Approach and Methods (35%): •A well thought-out and tailored approach to the technical work that responds to the City’s particular issues and needs. •Incorporation of innovative and/or creative approaches for providing the services that will maximize efficient, cost-effective operations or increased performance capabilities. •Evidence of the team’s ability to work collaboratively with other members of a multi- disciplinary team in a complex and dynamic working environment. Page of 18 34 669 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach •Demonstration of the team’s commitment to accurate and superior work products and services as detailed in the project management project management plan. Relevant Experience & Expertise (40%): •Recent experience preparing similar projects or providing similar services for jurisdictions. •Familiarity and experience with applicable industry standards and any relevant federal, state, or local requirements. •The depth and appropriateness of experience of individual members of the technical team as they relate to the specific technical tasks called for by the project •The team’s experience and ability to clearly communicate technical concepts and terminology with the community. Timeframe and Costs (15%): •Display of responsive timeframe to assign tasks. •Evidence of the team’s ability to successfully deliver project tasks and deliverables within the identified project budget and minimize cost overruns. Administration (10%): •Ability to comply with the timeline terms, and billing procedures. •The extent and nature of any proposed amendments to the City’s Professional Services Agreement. Page of 19 34 670 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 5. Contract Expectations 5.1 Contract Period The City anticipates the contract term would begin around April 1, 2020 and would include an initial term of two years, with the option for up to three (3) one-year extensions of the contract. 5.2 Professional Services Agreement The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City’s Professional Services Agreement. Proposers should identify and/or indicate any exceptions to the Sample Professional Services Agreement included in Section 6.2. The City Attorney or their designee retains the discretion to accept or reject proposed exceptions or modifications to the City’s Professional Services Agreement. 5.3 Standards of Work Approximately 30 days prior to the end of each term, a meeting may be held between the consultant(s) and the City of Hermosa Beach staff to conduct a performance review, revise the scope and/or language of the agreement, and confirm consultant rate schedules. The initial agreement and each renewal will require City Council approval. In case of conflicts, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors, or omissions, Consultant shall submit the matter to City for clarification. Any work affected by such conflicts, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors or omissions which is performed by Consultant prior to clarification by City shall be at Consultant's risk and expense. 5.4 Invoicing and Payment The task order for each project resulting from this on-call contract will be set up as a not to exceed rate to be billed monthly based on hours worked. The invoices shall reference the project title, and must list the charges by task, worker classification, hours, billing rate, and totals. Back up information must be submitted together with the invoices. Each invoice shall contain a progress report describing the work completed during the billing period and shall also include cost information by task regarding: previous work billed to date, work billed during the reporting period, percent of task completed and amount remaining by task. Page of 20 34 671 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 6. Attachments and Required Forms 6.1 Maps 6.1.1 City Map Page of 21 34 672 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 6.2 Sample Professional Services Agreement CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO ________________________________________________________________ BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND ___________________________ This AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 2020, by and between the CITY OF ___________________, a general law city a municipal corporation (“CITY”) and _, a limited liability company (“CONSULTANT”). R E C I T A L S A.The City desires to __________________________________________. B.The City does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the services required under this agreement and therefore, the City desires to contract for consulting services to accomplish this work. C.The Consultant warrants to the City that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement. D.The City desires to contract with the Consultant to perform the services as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, the City and the Consultant agree as follows: 1.CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as EXHIBIT A. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a total of $ , for CONSULTANT’s services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, by not later than the 10th day of each month, its invoice for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous month. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT all uncontested amounts set forth in CONSULTANT’s invoice within 30 days after it is received. 2.SCOPE OF SERVICES. CONSULTANT will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE OF SERVICE attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. Page of 22 34 673 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement. 3.PAYMENTS . For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the reimbursable costs, the specific tasks performed, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period in accordance with the schedule of compensation incorporated in “Exhibit A.” 4.TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of the CONTRACTOR are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from the CITY and shall continue until all authorized work is completed to the CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in “Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing by the CITY. 5.FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. 6.KEY PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT’s key person assigned to perform work under this Agreement is ________________. CONSULTANT shall not assign another person to be in charge of the work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the City. 7.TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on __________, 20___, unless earlier termination occurs under Section 11 of this Agreement, or this Agreement is extended in writing in advance by both parties. 8.CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties. 9.TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 10.PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONTRACTOR will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. 11.TERMINATION. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 30 days before the effective termination date. In the event of such termination, the CONTRACTOR shall cease services as of the date of termination, and all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other Page of 23 34 674 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach materials prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property, and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated. 12.INDEMNIFICATION. CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by CITY, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, and cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with CONSULTANT's performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT, regardless of CITY’S passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage which is caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY. Should CITY in its sole discretion find CONSULTANT’S legal counsel unacceptable, then CONSULTANT shall reimburse the CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. The CONSULTANT shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONSULTANT as required by Section 17, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification. 13.ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT’s professional services. CONSULTANT’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s written approval are prohibited and will be null and void. 14.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only. 15.AUDIT OF RECORDS. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement. Page of 24 34 675 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement. 16.CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement. CONSULTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by the City to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective measures shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement. 17.INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. A.The CONSULTANT, at the CONSULTANT’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies: 1.Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. The Consultant shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by the CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the CONTRACTOR for City. 2.General Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. 3.Automobile Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the CONSULTANT arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. 4.Professional Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from the CONSULTANT’S operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by the CONSULTANT or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit-per-occurrence basis. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect. Page of 25 34 676 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach B.Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional liability insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California, or which is approved in writing by City, and shall be endorsed as follows. CONSULTANT also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 1.“The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.” 2.This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the CITY, including any self-insured retention the CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy. 3.This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. 4.The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents. 5.Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. 6.The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the CITY. C.CONSULTANT agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against Contractor arising out of the work performed under this agreement. CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY. D.Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. At the CITY’s option, the CONSULTANT shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. E.The CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to the CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement. F.Failure on the part of the CONSULTANT to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which the CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11 above. G.The commercial general and automobile liability policies required by this Agreement shall allow City, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or Page of 26 34 677 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach deductible of the policy in lieu of the Consultant (as the named insured) should Consultant fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. Consultant understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by Consultant as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should City pay the SIR or deductible on Consultant’s behalf upon the Consultant’s failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, City may include such amounts as damages in any action against Consultant for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by City due to the breach. 18.USE OF OTHER CONSULTANTS. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY’s prior written approval to use any sub-consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must include approval of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation. 19.FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by the CONSULTANT of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of the CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONSULTANT for anything done, furnished or relating to the CONSULTANT’S work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of the CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by the CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of the CONSULTANT, its employees, sub-consultants and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by the CITY for any defect or error in the work prepared by the Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents. 20.CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the CONSULTANT shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during the City’s review of the Consultant’s report or plans. Should the Consultant fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by the CITY, and the cost thereof shall be charged to the CONSULTANT. In addition to all other available remedies, the City may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by the City or may withhold payment otherwise owed CONSULTANT under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction. 21.NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONSULTANT by CITY for services preformed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of CONSULTANT’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement shall cover payment for CONSULTANT’S services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year. Page of 27 34 678 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 22.NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows: Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Courtesy copies of notices may be sent via electronic mail, provided that the original notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or personally delivered as specified in this Section. A.SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability. B.THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT’s or CITY’s obligations under this Agreement. C.INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County. D.ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. E.RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party. F.AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY. CITY CONSULTANT City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ATTN: ATTN: Page of 28 34 679 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 23.ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Contract, agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission or scanned and delivered via electronic mail. Such facsimile or electronic mail copies will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. 24.FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other. 25.TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be provided. 26.ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled. 27.STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency. 28.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. It is understood and agreed that the City shall own all documents and other work product of the Consultant, except the Consultant’s notes and workpapers, which pertain to the work performed under this Agreement. The City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion and without further compensation to the Consultant, but any re-use of such documents by the City on any other project without prior written consent of the Consultant shall be at the sole risk of the City. 29.DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (City and Consultant initials required at one of the following paragraphs) By their respective initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is a “consultant” for the purposes of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties would require him or her to make one or more of the governmental decisions set forth in Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation 18701(a)(2) or otherwise serves in a staff capacity for which disclosure would otherwise be required were Consultant employed by the City. Consultant hereby acknowledges his or her assuming-office, annual, and leaving-office financial reporting obligations under the California Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code and agrees to comply with those obligations at his or her expense. Prior to consultant commencing services hereunder, the City’s Manager shall prepare Page of 29 34 680 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach and deliver to consultant a memorandum detailing the extent of Consultant’s disclosure obligations in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials ______ Consultant Initials ______ OR By their initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is not a “consultant” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of consultant in Fair Political Practice Commission Regulation 18701(a)(2)(A) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials ______ Consultant Initials ______ IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first herein above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT MAYOR By:TITLE ATTEST: Tanesha Hudson, City Clerk Taxpayer ID No. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Jenkins , City Attorney Page of 30 34 681 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3 Required Forms 6.3.1 Certification of Proposal RFQ #: _________ The undersigned hereby submits its proposal and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal (RFQ). 1.Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Proposal, Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. 2.By submitting the response to this request, Proposer agrees, if selected to furnish services to the City in accordance with this RFQ. 3.Proposer has carefully reviewed its proposal and understands and agrees that the City is not responsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the Proposer and that the Proposer is responsible for them. 4.It is understood and agreed that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals and to waive any informality or irregularity in any proposal received by the City. 5.The proposal response includes all of the commentary, figures and data required by the Request for Proposal 6.The proposal shall be valid for 90 days from the date of submittal. 7.Proposer acknowledges that the City may issue addendums related to this RFQ and that the proposer has reviewed the following addendums which have been issued: Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ 8. Proposer further acknowledges the provisions of any addendums issued have been incorporated into their proposal. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 31 34 682 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit RFQ #: _________ The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1.This proposal is not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation. 2.This proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham. 3.I have not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Proposer to put in a false or sham proposal and I have not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any other Proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal or to refrain from submitting to this RFQ. 4.I have not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price or to fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the proposal price or to secure any advantage against the City of Hermosa Beach or of anyone interested in the proposed contract. 5.All statements contained in the Proposal and related documents are true. 6.I have not directly or indirectly submitted the proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any person, corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, RFQ depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. 7.I have not entered into any arrangement or agreement with any City of Hermosa Beach public officer in connection with this proposal. 8.I understand collusive bidding is a violation of State and Federal law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 32 34 683 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements RFQ #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with the City’s insurance requirements contained within this RFQ. The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1.Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the insurance requirements as specified in the Request for Proposal. 2.If selected, proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 33 34 684 RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement RFQ #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City’s Professional Services Agreement. Proposers should identify and/or indicate any exceptions to the Sample Professional Services Agreement included in Section 6.2. The City Attorney or their designee retains the discretion to accept or reject proposed exceptions or modifications to the City’s Professional Services Agreement. 1.Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the conditions specified in the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement. 2.Proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein with exceptions noted as follows: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 34 34 685 686 20-1405 page 1 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena February 18, 2020 Romany BasilyousCity of Hermosa Beach | City Clerk Office1315 Valley Drive | Hermosa Beach, CA Subject: City of Hermosa Beach | RFQ On-Call Geotechnical Services RFQ 20-01 Koury Proposal No. 20-1405 Dear Romany Basilyous, Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc., (Koury) appreciates the opportunity to submit our qualifications to the City of Hermosa Beach, in Response to the Request for Qualifications for On-Call Geotechnical Services. Our objective is to support The City of Hermosa Beach with qualified geotechnical inspectors familiar with soil testing for the City of Hermosa Beach and our in-house laboratory capabilities to ensure that the City’s required quality control goals are met. Koury, which is headquartered in Chino, CA has been providing construction inspection and testing services in Southern California since 1992, and is currently under the leadership of Michele Shams (President/ CEO) and Dave Menefee (Sr. Vice President & COO). Koury operates two full-service laboratories. In addition to the Chino laboratory headquarters, the firm also operates a laboratory located in Gardena, CA. The geotechnical expertise provided by Koury includes but is not limited to: peer review of geotechnical reports and analysis, geotechnical services for seismic retrofit screening reports and plan submissions, technical advice and recommendations for land development projects, City projects, and development related City programs, seismic review, field investigation, data collection and preparation of geotechnical reports, consultation, feasibility evaluation and provide geotechnical designs. Our office support staff consists of laboratory and administrative personnel to perform to ensure attention to detail and timeliness. Koury has served as a consultant for numerous local municipalities and government agencies including, but not limited to, The County of Los Angeles, The Port of Long Beach, The Orange County Sanitation District, The Cities of Beverly Hills, Chino Hills, Orange, Beverly Hills, Brea, Santa Monica, Torrance, Norwalk, and Bell. Our firm is full accordance with all project contract documents and applicable ICC, CBC, ASTM, ACI, AASHTO, AWS standards, codes, city ordinances, regulations, laws, and common industry practices. Constance Ray is the main point of contact for this project and for clarification: Constance Ray, Marketing and Project Administrator 14280 Euclid Avenue Chino, CA 91710 (909) 606-6111 ext 208 & Fax- 909-606-6555 | Connier@kouryengineering.com. We look forward to the opportunity to work with The City of Hermosa BeachSincerely, Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc, Nicole MillerVice President of Sales 687 20-1405 page 2 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Firm ProfileFirm Profile City of Hermosa Beach Department of Public Works Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 20-01 On-Call Geotechnical Services in the City of Hermosa Beach, California 688 20-1405 page 3 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc. (individual business organization) has been providing construction inspection and testing services in Southern California since 1992 (28 Years of business and providing realted services) and is currently under the leadership of Michele Shams, President/CEO, and Dave Menefee, Sr. Vice President/COO. Constance Ray is the primary point of contact for this project and for clarification: Constance Ray, Marketing and Project Administrator 14280 Euclid Avenue Chino, CA 91710 Office: (909)606-6111 ext. 208 & Fax: 909-606-6555 | Email: Connier@kouryengineering.com. Koury operates one full-service laboratory located in Chino with a branch offices located in Gardena (17800 South Main Street, Gardena, CA 90248). We are licensed and approved as a geotechnical and construction materials testing lab by several oversight agencies. We have an experienced team of Registered Civil and Geotechnical Engineers on staff. Currently, Koury has over 100 inspectors and technicians in the field daily. Our office support staff consists of the necessary laboratory and clerical personnel to perform tests and inspections accurately and quickly. At Koury Engineering & Testing, we differentiate ourselves from the competition with our responsive team mentality. This translates into the sheer volume of our many repeat clients. Their testimonials and references alone speak to our ability to service and communicate directly to our client needs. We provide a full range of geotechnical engineering, engineering geology, material testing and special inspection services for all phases of construction projects. Our seasoned inspectors carry multiple certifications for an efficient, cost effective work flow. Each member of the team brings together decades of practical experience, knowledge of the most recent engineering methods and codes, and unparalleled expertise in various disciplines Koury maintains clients and contracts in private development, schools, hospitals, municipalities and transportation projects. Having diversified experience and capability of services creates a stable foundation for the company and its long term growth. Firm’s Official Name: Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc. Firm’s Official Address: 14280 Euclid Avenue, Chino, CA 91710 Phone Number: (909) 606-6111 Type of Business Structure: S Corporation, Incorporated in CA Year Incorporated 1992 Federal Employer ID 95-47994329 DIR # 1000007497 Agency Certifications and Approvals AASHTO AMRL ACI ACE Caltrans CCRL DSA ICC MTA OSHPD City of Los Angeles County of Los Angeles County of San Diego Firm Profile 689 20-1405 page 4 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services UnderstadingProject Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work City of Hermosa Beach Department of Public Works Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 20-01 On-Call Geotechnical Services in the City of Hermosa Beach, California 690 20-1405 page 5 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Statement of Project Understanding Koury personnel have a proven wide variety of experience through successful completion of hundreds of projects for private and public clients. Koury has recently completed numerous projects for various cities in Southern California (e.g. Torrance, Orange, Long Beach, Santa Monica) and Unified School Districts, including the Los Angeles Unified School District, Torrance Unified School District, and William S Hart Union High School District. Through the performance of these projects and other projects Koury’s personnel have acquired extensive experience with geotechnical subsurface exploration, groundwater evaluation and monitoring, monitoring well installation, percolation testing, shallow and deep foundation design and analysis, lateral earth pressure evaluation, slope stability analysis, landslide studies, tieback and soil-nail design, earth quantity calculations, instrumentation and monitoring, microtunneling studies, underpinning, pressure grouting, settlement and expansive soil evaluation, and preparation of comprehensive geotechnical reports. In addition to performing their own geotechnical studies, Koury personnel have been responsible for reviewing other consultant geotechnical reports. For example, Third Party Review Report Review was performed on behalf of the City of Santa Monica, City of Anaheim, City of San Clemente, County of Orange, and for the Talega Development in the San Clemente Area. Seismic Hazard and Mitigation Analysis Through their research and project experience in Southern California, Koury personnel have acquired theoretical and practical knowledge to deal with seismic hazards for design of buildings, slopes, earthwork construction, retaining walls and seashore structures. Koury personnel routinely prepare ground motion response spectra, perform seismic hazard evaluation, liquefaction analysis, including liquefaction triggering, liquefaction-induced settlement and lateral spreading analysis. Koury has personnel specializing in deterministic and probabilistic seismic hazard (PSHA) analysis, equivalent linear and non-linear site response analysis, site characterization for the purpose of seismic analysis and design, seismic deformation analysis using Newmark’s method and finite element and finite difference methods. Our capabilities and experience also include reliability-based design, liquefaction hazard mapping, seismic design of onshore marine structures, including quay walls, breakwaters and jetties. We also perform seismic deformation analysis of deep foundation systems, seismic slope stability analysis of natural slopes using limit equilibrium methods and finite element-based approaches, and seismic deformation analysis of urban tunnels in soft ground. Other Specialized Engineering Evaluation and Testing In addition to that previously discussed, Koury also specializes in the following engineering areas; namely, a) forensic investigation, b) ground improvements, c) pavement technology, d) surface mapping and subsurface imaging, e) geotechnical construction observation and testing, f) on-site inspection and testing of masonry, concrete and steel, g) geotechnical laboratory testing and h) material laboratory testing of steel, concrete and masonry. Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work 691 20-1405 page 6 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Forensic Investigation At the clients’ request, Koury performs investigations to determine the cause of distress to existing facilities and to prepare alternative recommendations for repair. Forensic investigations performed by Koury personnel have included various facilities, including pavement and concrete flatwork distress, building distress, and slope distress. Koury personnel have also provided expert testimony for clients. Ground Improvement Ground improvements is often necessary for site development due to soft conditions, wet conditions, expansive soils, liquefiable soils, collapsible soils, and unstable slopes. In other cases, ground improvement is necessary to mitigate “pumping subgrade” and recurring failure of pavement and other flatwork. Koury personnel have designed and monitored observation of the construction of projects requiring soil-cement stabilization, lime and fly ash stabilization, geotextile and aggregate stabilization, soil-cement columns, pressure grouting stabilization, stone columns, and Geopiers. Pavement Technology With the millions of miles of paved road in Southern California, the construction of new pavement and rehabilitation of existing pavement is constantly on going. Koury personnel have worked on hundreds of projects requiring design of flexible and rigid pavements, design of pavement pavers and porous pavement. Koury also performs visual survey of pavement, deflection survey, pavement rehabilitation study, and design of overlay. Surface Mapping and Subsurface Imaging With the increasing addition to existing streets, roadways, parking areas, public facilities, and the improvement, addition and rerouting of existing utilities, there is an increasing demand for better surface mapping and subsurface imaging to locate underground utilities. Koury has acquired the latest technology to located underground utilities, for potholing, and for inspection inside buried pipes to determine their conditions. Koury has also the capabilities to locate post-tensioned cables, conduits and rebar reinforcement in concrete. 692 20-1405 page 7 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Koury Engineering Licenses and Services Our team provides a full range of geotechnical and engineering geology, material testing and special inspection services for all phases of projects. Our staff consists of highly experienced engineers and geologists who have worked worldwide on a variety of geotechnical and environmental projects and soil technicians and inspectors that have multiple certifications and decades of experience. Our in-house capabilities follow: Geotechnical Engineering • Comprehensive Geotechnical Engineering (Soils) Report for: • All buildings types, including Commercial, industrial, residential • Bridges • Mass Grading Projects • Field Improvements • Parks/Sports Facilities • Geotechnical Field Explorations/ Investigations • Ground Water Evaluation • Foundation Design and Recommendations • Shallow Foundation System Analysis • Deep Foundation System Analysis • Settlement Analysis • Ground Motion Response Spectra • Seismic Risk Analysis • Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement Analysis • Slope Stability Investigation and Analysis • Seismic Deformation Analysis of Slopes • Site Reconnaissance • Lateral Earth Pressure Analysis • Tie-Back Analysis • Pavement Design and Recommendations • Shrinkage and Subsidence Analysis • Instrumentation and Monitoring of Soils, Piles, and Shoring Systems Engineering Geology • Fault Trenching • Seismic Hazard Evaluation • Geologic Mapping • Landslide Evaluation • Slope Stability Evaluation • Subsurface Exploration • Aerial Photography Review • Review of Geologic Literature Laboratory Testing • Atterberg Limits • Consolidation • Density • Direct Shear • Direct Shear - Remolded Sample • Durability Index • Expansion Index • Hydrometer Analysis • Maximum Density • Moisture Content • R- Value • Specific Gravity • Soundness • Swell • Sieve Analysis • #200 Wash • Sand Equivalent Value • Unconfined Compression • Unit Weight 693 20-1405 page 8 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Joseph Martinez Lab Manager Laboratory Manager On-Call Geotechnical Services (RFQ 20-01) City of Hermosa Beach Jacques B. Roy, P.E. G.E. Geotechnical Principal-in-Charge Geotechnical Engineer Jeffery Lantosh Field Tech Supervisor Field Manager Michael Carrillo Operations Manager Project Manager Test Results QA Pickup Drivers Technicians Engineers Geologist Laboratory Dispatchers Field Inspectors & Technicians Michele Shams President & CEO Dave Menefee Sr. VP & COO Principals Project Managering Engineer Mike Mohajeran Project Managering Engineer Organizational ChartBelow is our company project organization chart, complete with a main point of contact for the City of Hermosa Beach, and brief job descriptions below personnel names. Constance Ray First point of contact for the City Marketing and Project Administrator Mathew Perry Soils Lab Manager Geotechnical Laboratory Technician Michael Molina VP of Client Services Client Service Albert Buffet Staff Geologists Geologists 694 20-1405 page 9 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Approach to Work Program As part of daily activities, Koury personnel perform construction observation and testing. These activities may range from the most complex slope stabilization to the simplest trench backfill testing. On a routine basis, our field personnel perform observation and testing during mass grading, utility trench backfill, retaining wall backfill, earth structure construction, excavation of footings and slabs, presoaking of flatwork subgrade, pavement subgrade, base and surfacing, and piles installation. Our field personnel is assisted by registered geologists and engineers for more complex construction such as tieback, stability of excavation, soil nailing and anchoring, shoring installation, ground improvements, and stabilization structures. For Geotechnical Engineering Review Services, Koury normally prepares a proposal which serves as a work plan. a. The proposal outlines the understanding of the project, anticipated subsurface conditions, scope of work, estimated fee and schedule. The proposed field exploration is described in detail along with the proposed laboratory testing, type of analysis, and the anticipated content of the report. The Principal Engineer-in-charge reviews the proposal for quality assurance before it is forwarded to the City. b. The City reviews the proposal, asks for clarification if necessary, and issue an authorization to proceed. Upon receiving authorization, Koury assembles a team of geologists and engineers, prepares the exploration layout, and schedules the field exploration. c. Published geological maps and reports, hazard maps (liquefaction, landslide), groundwater maps, and site aerial photographs are reviewed. The purpose of this review is to determine the anticipated subsurface conditions in order to select appropriate methods of subsurface exploration, equipment and to assess the required depth of the field exploration points. At that time, a site visit is made to confirm access and to validate the procedures for the field exploration. d. The maps provided by the City are used to check for utility locations, and the exploration points are located in the field. Underground Service Alert (USA) is notified of Koury intention to excavate and of our request to clear the exploration point locations. e. The field exploration subcontractors are retained, scheduled and a safety program is prepared. Any required permits such as boring permit or encroachment permit are applied for at that time. Prior to performing the field exploration, the field geologist or engineer meets with the Principal Engineer-in-charge to confirm the details of the field exploration, including safety, sampling protocol (SPT, California sample and bulk samples), depth of exploration, backfilling, cleanup, permits and communication during the field exploration. f. During the site exploration, the samples obtained from the field exploration are placed in airtight containers before transportation to Koury’s laboratory for further classification and testing. Upon arrival to the laboratory, each sample is logged into our tracking software and a laboratory program is prepared by the project engineer (PE). The laboratory program is reviewed with the Principal Engineer-in-charge prior to submittal to the laboratory supervisor. As each test is completed the results are cataloged and logged into the computer. During this process the PE monitors the completion of the laboratory tests and confirms that the appropriate tests have been 695 20-1405 page 10 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services scheduled per the exploration plan. The laboratory program most frequently includes moisture content, dry unit weight, consolidation, expansion index, shear, corrosivity, gradation, #200 sieve wash, Atterberg Limits, and R-value; the number and type of tests depend on the mate¬rial encountered, soil variation and conditions, and the intent of the study. Quality assurance is performed on the laboratory test results by the Senior Engineer prior to performing the analyses. g. Using the data from the boring logs and laboratory testing, the project engineer performs necessary analyses to determine static and seismic settlements, liquefaction potential, bearing capacity, lateral and vertical capacity of piles, lateral pressure and lateral resistance for retaining walls, pavement design, etc., depending upon the project needs. h. Upon completion of laboratory testing and engineering analysis, the Senior Engineer prepares a comprehensive geotechnical report containing a description of the work performed, a field exploration location map, the field and laboratory data collected, a description of the subsurface conditions, explanation of the proposed development and grading, geologic settings, seismic hazards, building code parameters, anticipated total and differential settlements, and corrosion potential at the site. Also, the geotechnical report provides recommendations for site preparation, earthwork, remedial removals, slope inclination, compaction requirements, support of floor slabs, site percolation rate, support of building walls and columns, retaining structures design, and flexible and rigid pavement design. The Principal Engineer-in-charge reviews the calculation package from the project engineer and the geotechnical report for conformance with the standards of practice. j. At the City preference, a pdf copy of the report is submitted in a “draft form” for the design team review. The review comments are subsequently incorporated into the report prior to finalization. The report is distributed by our in-house distribution center to an approved predetermined distribution list. k. Once the structural and civil drawings are finalized, they are submitted to the Geotechnical Engineer to verify that the recommendations of the geotechnical report have been incorporated into the design. The Geotechnical Engineer and Engineering Geologist review the plans for general conformance with the geotechnical report recommendations and sign the plans if needed. Proven Experience in Meeting Project Schedules Koury Engineering & Testing is known for our prompt delivery of final results and our delivery of on-going tests and project inspection daily reports as promised within appropriate time frames. In urgent situations, we are capable of quick turnaround. From the moment of call in to our capable dispatch team, to inspector or lab technician arrival, we can provide a response in as little as 2-4 hours, dependent upon the certification or laboratory test required. We have over 20 years of experience in the delivery of dailies and are aware of the need for results to be communicated to the client upon completion. Materials Testing and Special Inspection results are a necessity for the safety of all those involved on site. Delays become costly to the contractor if they proceed at their own risk. 696 20-1405 page 11 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services We are capable of delivering results and responding to last minute or emergency dispatch calls within four hours and sometimes two, depending on the test and distance to job site. Value Added Service - Surface Mapping and Subsurface Imaging With the increasing addition to existing streets, roadways, parking areas, public facilities, and the improvement, and rerouting of existing utilities, there is an increasing demand for better surface mapping and subsurface imaging to locate underground utilities. Koury has acquired the latest technology to locate underground utilities, for potholing, and for inspection inside buried pipes to determine their conditions. Koury also has the capabilities to locate post-tensioned cables, conduits and rebar reinforcement in concrete. 697 20-1405 page 12 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services ManagementProject Management Plan City of Hermosa Beach Department of Public Works Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 20-01 On-Call Geotechnical Services in the City of Hermosa Beach, California 698 20-1405 page 13 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Communication Approach Koury routinely performs construction observation, field testing, soil and material sampling. The construction observation and testing team includes Caltrans certified inspectors, is headed by our Field Manager (Michael Carrillo) who has several years of observation and testing experience. Our technicians are selected based on the needs of the project and their prior experience. If significant earthwork is involved, the Field Manager (Jeff Lantosh) will spend some time on site during the first few days of grading to verify that the soil conditions are as anticipated and the technician questions as well as those of the contractor are answered. During construction, the project manager (PM) oversees the project through documenting all communication with the Client tracking the project progress and providing quality control oversight to maintain the client’s overall satisfaction. Koury’s dispatch team serves as the point of contact for all scheduling of testing and inspection needs while the PM serves as the point of contact for all administrative related needs. Throughout the duration of the project Koury’s PM attends scheduled project meetings as needed. The first step of the work plan for construction activities is to assemble a construction observation and testing team. a) Construction team. The construction observation and testing team, consisting of several ICC certified technicians, is headed by a Field Supervisor and a Field Engineer, both with several years of observation and testing experience. Either the Field Supervisor or the Field Engineer and the PM attend the pregrade meeting with the contractor and the authorized client representative. The construction schedule and needs of the project are normally discussed at the meeting. Our technicians are assigned to the project based on the needs of the project and the technician prior experience. The Field Supervisor or Field Engineer will spend some time on site during the first few days of grading to verify that the soil conditions are as anticipated and the technician questions as well as those of the contractor are answered. b) Testing procedures. Field density tests are performed in accordance with the sand cone test method and/or nuclear gauge following the ASTM standards. Each batch of sand purchased is calibrated. All field-testing is performed in substantial conformance with the project documents, as directed by the client, project architect, or structural engineer. The quantity of testing and inspection is a function of the contractor(s) and subcontractor(s) efficiency, requirements of the building official, and weather conditions during construction. c) Documentation. Prior to the start of observation and testing, the Field Engineer prepares a field file and an office file for the jobs that contain all the geotechnical reports and plans pertinent to the job. On a daily basis, the technician must prepare a daily report that is left on the job site. As a quality control measure, the Field Supervisor reviews and signs the technician daily reports and their maps with the tests plotted. The reviewed dailies are forwarded to the accounting department and PM for further processing. Electronic copies of the dailies are provided on a weekly basis to the client representative when requested. d) RFI. During construction, there may be questions from the contractor or designers, or changes from the designers. A Senior Geotechnical Engineer or a Principal Engineer is assigned to answer these questions, and to provide additional recommendations as needed. e) Laboratory support. Koury in house laboratories support the field observation and testing. Laboratory personnel are allowed to work overtime to support the field operation as needed. The most frequent tests performed during geotechnical construction are maximum density on soil, aggregate, and asphalt, expansion index, gradation and sand equivalent. Project Management Plan 699 20-1405 page 14 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services f) On going quality control and quality assurance. During construction, the Senior Geologist or Field Engineer makes unscheduled site visits to verify that the work is performed in accordance with the standards and to answer questions if needed. The technicians are also supported by the office engineers. g) Ongoing management. Our management team performs supervision and coordination of all field and laboratory services. They are constantly involved in all laboratory testing and analysis results. Our clerical staff assists in maintaining a high level of quality assurance in preparation of reports, presentation of test results and observations. Engineering consultation is available as needed or as requested. h) Invoicing for construction observation and testing. Prior to sending invoices to the client’s the PM reviews the invoices according to the contract terms and any approved change orders. The invoices are forwarded to the distribution department where they are matched with the corresponding week’s dailies and test results. The invoice packages are distributed to the predetermined distribution list. I) Project closeout. Upon completion of the project, the PM works in conjunction with the project closeout department and the representative to verify that all services are completed and accounted for. If requested by our clients, a geotechnical compaction report is prepared by our Senior Project Engineer and reviewed by the Principal Engineer. The report is distributed to the predetermined distribution list and the PM updates the tracking software indicating the project completion. Our PM coordinates with the representative to close the project, collect outstanding invoices and ensure satisfaction. Once the project is closed, it will remain in our archives for 10 years. Cost Control and Scheduling Our first step to control cost is to assign experienced personnel with the tasks. We then assign a time schedule to each task. Once the time is up, the work must be delivered. We will assign highly skilled, multi-certified inspectors to perform deputy inspection services, enabling one inspector to perform inspection on multiple disciplines, which in turn saves our client money by cutting down the number of inspectors in the field daily. Our services will be performed at the request of an authorized representative, who will be responsible for coordinating our services within the construction schedule. We request at least 24-hours advance notice prior to the time of our services, in order to meet the project needs. However, we will make every attempt to provide personnel, providing the personnel are available, for last minute requests for an expedited fee. Koury’s scheduling of inspectors and technicians is dependent upon the Construction Schedule; however, our seasoned staff are skilled at sensing problems and constraints before they occur and offering timely resolutions to problems as they happen. As part of our Budget Tracking System, Koury Engineering tracks and documents all re-inspection costs. If a certain portion of the project does not pass initial inspection or testing, Koury’s inspectors and technicians must re-test/re-inspect the material to ensure it meets the specified standards. This can cause Koury’s initial estimate to be exceeded; however, Koury carefully tracks these conditions so that our clients have complete documentation and can charge the contractor for any re-inspection costs that may have accrued. Koury also offers real-time budget reporting, so that our clients are always up-to-date on project budgets and schedules. 700 20-1405 page 15 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Quality Assurance/Quality Control Approach All our geotechnical investigations and pavement evaluation projects start with a proposal that gives an expected schedule for project delivery and an expected budget. The schedule will be discussed with the client representative so that all parties remain informed. At Koury, Quality Control (QC) can be found at nearly every step it takes to complete a soil report or provide observation and testing services. Our QC includes: • Noting potential QC issues into our customized project management program prior to beginning a project. • Reviewing all the engineering calculations, analyses and reports prepared by our engineering staff and our principal and senior professional(s) working on the project. • Reviewing all the engineering recommendations and designed alternatives/solutions for different parts of the project considering their practicality, compatibility with applicable codes and time and cost impact on the project. • Logging all laboratory samples into our QC system when they are brought in. The responsible civil or geotechnical engineer is then consulted for priority or questions on specific test methods to ensure tests are performed per the correct standards. • Review of test results after each test is completed (by the responsible engineer). • Overseeing the project schedule on a regular basis, to assure the satisfactory progress of the tasks and coordinating required progress meetings with the clients to meet the project’s schedule. • Submitting a monthly progress report to the introduced client representative. This is done for monitoring and testing in order to keep track of hours worked and hours left if any estimate is prepared. Koury’s quality control manager, Ms. Lucy Zuniga, maintains our laboratory certificates and ensures that all tests are being completed according to industry and regulatory agencies standards. Supervision and coordination of field and laboratory services will be performed by the field operations manager and the quality assurance/quality control manager on almost a daily basis. Our laboratory testing process is as follows: • For each laboratory sample, the tests needed and due dates are logged in Koury’s Quality Control system upon arrival at the lab. • Specified test methods and requirements are described and followed • The responsible civil or geotechnical engineer reviews priority, specific test methods, and results upon test completion. • Formalized results are copied to accounting and report distribution staff. • If the client wishes, preliminary results can be faxed or phoned as soon as they are available. • We can provide quick turn-around times, along with Saturday material pick up and laboratory testing. Engineering staff and clerical staff will assist in quality assurance and the preparation of reports presenting test results and observations. All needed test results for information or material compliance can be obtained from our office as early as 7AM on a daily basis and as early as needed if requested by the previous day. The standards of our laboratory procedures are verified through yearly independent recertification of our laboratory personnel and equipment calibration program. Our laboratories are AASHTO, DSA, AMRL, CALTRANS and US Corps of Engineers certified. Our peer and management reviews further contribute to Quality Control and Quality Assurance. 701 20-1405 page 16 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services ExperienceExperience and Qualifications City of Hermosa Beach Department of Public Works Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 20-01 On-Call Geotechnical Services in the City of Hermosa Beach, California 702 20-1405 page 17 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services As-Needed Building Inspection Projects • MLK Jr. Medical Center Interns and Residents Recuperative Care Center • Fire Command and Control Facility • San Ferando Valley Family Support Center • Oxford Retention Basin • Bethune Park • Mona Park • Carver • Marina Del Rey - Marina Boathouse • Marina Beach Improvements • Yvonne Burke Park Owner: Los Angeles County Dept. of Public Works Contact: Michael Ignatius Project Manager (626) 458-6394 mignatiu@dpw.lacounty.gov Project Duration: Octomber 2013 | On-Going Los Angeles County Public Works | As-Needed Building Related Inspection Services Alhambra, CA Koury Engineering is currently serving a second three (3) year as-needed contract term for quality assurance and inspection staff augmentation services for the County of Los Angeles. Koury has provided qualified personnel (building inspectors, special inspectors, and Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD), Inspector of Record (IOR) inspectors) within 24 hours of notification to provide as-needed building-related inspection services to support various County construction projects throughout the County of Los Angeles. Our team has 20 years of experience performing geotechnical engineering, geotechnical monitoring, materials and testing services as well as special inspections for cities and municipalities; we have served as an On-Call Consultant for several local municipalities including, but not limited to, the County of Los Angeles, Cities of Santa Monica, Santa fe Springs, Glendale, Beverly Hills, Norwalk, West Hollywood, La Mirada, Brea, Port of Long Beach and was previously listed on the on-call for the City of Thousand Oaks from 2014 to 2018. Experience and Qualifications 703 20-1405 page 18 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Foster Road Side Panel Improvements From Studebaker Road to Pioneer Boulevard Norwalk, CA Project Description: The Foster Road Side Panel Project will provide a safe walking and bike route to school as well as enhance safety along this corridor between Studebaker Road and Pioneer Boulevard. Side panels are located along Foster Road at the following sections: Studebaker Road to Fairford Road – Both Sides of Foster Road, Fairford Road to Gridley Road – South side of Foster Road, and Jersey Avenue to Pioneer Boulevard – North side of Foster Road. The project also includes design of an on-street bike way from Pioneer Boulevard to Studebaker Road, concrete meandering sidewalk in the side panels, connections and upgrades to existing sidewalk, ADA ramps along the corridor, safety lighting for the side panel sections, low level landscape treatments, drainage treatments and storm drain upgrades, miscellaneous roadway paving, and removal of interfering trees. Project Scope: We were subcontractors to FCG Consultants and supported them in providing soils monitoring, asphalt observation and testing, inspection of concrete pavement, laboratory testing of concrete cylinder compression, max density, and AC Marshall testing all in accordance with the City’s Acceptance Testing Criteria. Owner: City of Norwalk Contact: Millie Khuu Assistant Engineer (562) 929-5345 mkhuu@norwalkca.gov Project Duration: January 2018 | On-Going Construction Cost: $2,208,000 Koury is able to comply with the funding requirements and standards of the Federal Highway Administration (FHA). We understand your projects may be funded with a mix of federal, state and local funding, and must adhere to the requirements set forth for federally-assisted contracts in the California Department of Transportation (“Caltrans”) Local Assistance Procedures Manual (“LAPM”). If selected, we further understand that we will be responsible for ensuring that the construction of the PROJECT is administered in accordance with the construction contract documents and applicable statutes, procedures and other requirements related to federal-aid contracts described or referenced in the LAPM. Through past experience on several projects, we possess a thorough understanding of the current LAPM as it pertains to the management and administration of construction contracts funded wholly, or in part, by federal funds and will be responsible for generating and organizing the various documentation described in the LAPM. Below are past projects that further detail our experience. City of Norwalk | On-Call | Professional Construction Materials and Soils Testing Services Norwalk, CA Koury Engineering has an On-Call Contract with the City of Norwalk for services that include providing construction materials and soils acceptance and independent assurance testing services for road rehabilitation projects in the City of Norwalk. These rehabilitation projects shall include constructing Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb access ramps, pavement grinding, removal, and replacement of failed AC pavement, and placement of ARHM overlays. Primary Contact: Bill Zimmerman, City Engineer; Email: bzimmerman@norwalkca.gov; Phone: (562) 929-5763, Address: 12700 Norwalk Blvd, Norwalk, CA 90650 704 20-1405 page 19 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Koury provided quality control including inspection and laboratory testing for concrete, rebar, mix designs, welding, structural reinforced concrete, asphalt concrete and provided geotechnical services including soils compaction testing, sieve analysis, expansion index, subsurface exploration, compaction, moisture testing, and more. Also prepared reports containing project approach, field investigation, laboratory tests and results, analysis of field and lab data. Key Personnel included Jacques B. Roy, Mehrab Jesmani, Mike Mohajaren, Greg Ginther and various inspectors/technicians. Barton Circle Soils Investigation (Oct 2016 - April 2017) Primary Contact: Robert Garcia, Associate Civil Engineer Email: robertgarcia@santafesprings.org Phone: (562) 868-0511 Address: 11710 Telegraph Road, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Scope: Koury provided soils investigation for the city street sinking at two different locations around Barton Circle and Painter Avenue in the City of Santa Fe Springs. City of Santa Fe Springs - Street Improvements Greenleaf Ave Between Los Nietos Rd and Telegraph Rd (Jan 2018 - Jan 2019) Primary Contact: Robert Garcia, Associate Civil Engineer Email: robertgarcia@santafesprings.org Phone: (562) 868-0511 Address: 11710 Telegraph Road, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Scope: Koury provided soils compaction and testing for various sreets. Gridley Road Rehabilitation (Aug 2015 - June 2016) Primary Contact: Robert Garcia, Associate Civil Engineer Email: robertgarcia@santafesprings.org Phone: (562) 868-0511 Address: 11710 Telegraph Road, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Scope: Koury provided material inspection and testing services that included concrete, masonry, and structural steel. Non-destructive testing also included Ultrasonic and dye penetrant. The items of rehabilitation for this project included: PCC curb and gutter, PCC curb ramps, mill and remove existing AC pavement, unclassified exacavation, constructing cement treated base, AC pavement, adjusting utility covers to grade, signing and striping and other associated roadway work items. City of Santa Fe Springs - Streets for Soils Analysis (Mar 2017 - Aug 2017) Primary Contact: Robert Garcia, Associate Civil Engineer Email: robertgarcia@santafesprings.org Phone: (562) 868-0511 Address: 11710 Telegraph Road, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Scope: Koury provided soils investigation which included, R Values, structural section recommendations, and suggested improvements for various sreets. City of Santa Fe Springs- As Needed Services for Geotechnical and Material Inspections 705 20-1405 page 20 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services City of Glendale | Kenneth Road Rehabilitation (Pavement Rehabilitation) Glendale, CA Project Description: Street Improvements for the City of Glendale. The work generally includes: Selective removal and repair of broken and damaged curbs and gutters; driveway and alley approaches; side- walks; and deteriorated asphaltic concrete pavement; Installation of new sidewalk on Kenneth Road where there are none; Installation and/or reconstruction of curb ramps; Surface grinding of existing asphalt concrete pavement; Placement of Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) surface course; Installation of pavement striping, Sharrows, and other pavement markings Project Scope: We provided construction observation, material testing and concrete engineering on the project. Observing, inspecting, sampling and testing of Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (A.R.H.M.) pavement placement observation, and compaction testing at the project site; and Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (A.R.H.M.) sampling and testing (specific gravity, extraction and gradation) at the asphalt plant. Owner: City of Glendale Arthur Asaturyan (818) 937-8247 aasaturyan@glendaleca.gov Project Duration: Oct 2018 - Jan 2019 City of Bell Street Improvement and Slurry Seal Project 2014/2015 Bell, CA Project Description: The City of Bell needed our services for projects that consisted of street resurfacing, reconstruction and slurry seal various streets. This is to assist in the $240,000 street rehabilitation project in various streets. Project Scope: Koury has performed pavement investigations, material observation, and testing during construction of street rehab, asphalt concrete, slurry seal, PCC, compaction testing of soil and base materials. Street Slurry Seal + (2” Grind & Overlay): Bear Ave between Gage Ave and Randolph St + (1,456 SF of Grind and Overlay), Gifford Ave between Gage Ave and Bell Ave + (576 SF of Grind and Overlay). King Ave between Florence Ave and Weik Ave, Nevada St from Wilcox Ave to end + (280 SF of Grind and Overlay). Palm Ave between Gage Ave and Randolph St, Woodward Ave between Weik Ave and Gage Ave + (16,924 SF of Grind and Overlay). Street Reconstruction (Full depth): Alamo Ave between Acacia St and Bell Ave and PCC Replacement: River Dr between Randolph St and Gage Ave (791 SF). Owner: City of Bell Kevin Ho Associate Engineer (323) 463-4100 kho@cityofbell.org Project Duration: Mar 2015 - Dec 2015 706 20-1405 page 21 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services City of Santa Monica | SP2235 Fire Station #1 | Geotechnical, Deputy, and Material Testing Inspection Services | On-call Services 1337 7th Street, Santa Monica, CA Project Description: The Fire Station No. 1 Project will be a 28,690 sq ft, two-story (including mezzanine) building with a 18,348 sq ft basement/subterranean parking garage. It will include: subterranean parking, 7 apparatus bays, offices, a community room, restrooms, utility main point of connection/entry rooms, miscellaneous equipment storage, repair rooms, and 20 dorm rooms, offices, men’s and women’s toilet/shower facilities, kitchen and dining rooms, a workout room and four exterior decks on the second floor. The building will include a four stop elevator. Project Scope: Construction will require excavation, retaining walls, cast in place concrete slab on grade and elevated slabs, steel super structure, new utility connections, concrete site work, deep well storm water infiltration system in the street, full alley repaving, irrigation, lighting, residential finishes, kitchen, landscaping on property and neighboring property, gasoline and diesel storage tanks, emergency generator, fire sprinklers. Koury Engineering has been awarded this project and will provide deputy material inspections and testing services, geotechnical soils monitoring and testing for all of the above trades. Owner: City of Santa Monica Contact: Alex Parry, Project Manager, Sr. Architect (310) 458-2205 alex.parry@smgov.net Project Duration: July 2018 | On-Going Construction Cost: $ 28,000,000 City of Santa Monica | On-Call | Geotechnical, Deputy, and Material Testing Inspection Services Santa Monica, CA Koury supports the City with registered engineers and qualified inspection staff to ensure quality testing and inspection on projects throughout the City of Santa Monica. 707 20-1405 page 22 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services City of Beverly Hills | Police Facility – Large Vehicle Storage Building 464 N. Rexford Drive, Beverly Hills, CA Project Description: This project consisted of constructing a new Police Facility for large vehicle storage and the associated site work. The construction included steel columns supported by cast-in-place caissons, metal stud walls supported by continuous footings and stem walls, concrete slab on grade, steel structure framing, metal decks and lightweight concrete, concrete walls and flatworks on-site. Project Scope: For this project we provided the geotechnical engineering reports for the foundation bearing, fill materials and provided advisement that the building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report and the utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted. We also performed special inspection and testing for cast-in-place concrete, structural steel welding for the shop and field, all field welding, reinforcement welding, metal deck welding, stud welding at composite deck, anchor bolts installed in concrete, installation of wedge anchors and adhesive anchors. City of Beverly Hills | On-Call | Geotechnical and Seismic Engineering, Construction Inpsection and Materials Testing Services Beverly Hills, CA Koury Engineering has an On-Call Contract with the City of Brea for geotechnical and materials and testing services including geotechnical monitoring, soils testing and investigations, and various materials and testing services. City of Beverly Hills | Roxbury Park Community Center Project Description: The project consisted of a demo of an existing single story community center and constructing a new 20,275 ft2 single story structure with associated site work. The new community center included a patio, basketball court, tennis area, library, kitchen, meeting rooms, exercise studio, and auditorium. Project Scope: For this project we provided the special inspection and testing for concrete, masonry, shear wall sheathing, structural steel welding in the shop and field, fireproofing, and non-destructive testing. Client: City of Beverly Hills Contact: Karen Domerchie, Project Manager (310) 285-2463 kdomerchie@beverlyhills.org Project Duration: July 2015 - Oct 2016 Construction Value: $ 6 Million - $10 Million Client: City of Beverly Hills Contact: Karen Domerchie, Project Manager (310) 285-2463 kdomerchie@beverlyhills.org Project Duration: July 2015 - Nov 2016 Construction Cost: $969,000 708 20-1405 page 23 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services City of Brea | Lambert Road and Kraemer Boulevard PN 7318 Geotechnical Support (QAP) Brea, CA Project Description: The City of Brea improved Kraemer Blvd (along Golden Ave to Lambert Road ). Project was scheduled to be 80 working days and consist of street rehabilitation improvements and reconstruction of curb, curb and gutter and access ramp improvements on Lambert Road and Kraemer Boulevard. Project Scope: Provided the City with Caltrans tech as QA/QC lab for this project. Primary geotechnical firm was Ninyo & Moore performing soils monitoring testing for this project. We were scheduled thru Ninyo & Moore as the Independent Assurance Program ONLY (IAP) for the Geotechnical Inspection services as part of the Quality Assurance Program (QAP) requirement for federally funded projects. Reviewed the personnel qualification of the (AT) lab and lab certification and equipment calibration for tests to be performed. Visited the (LOR) lab to verify that the equipment was in working order and calibrated decals were current. Performed periodic Field Visits to verify the field testing procedure and test side by side with AT personnel to correlate test results. Q/A lab will determined days for periodic (side by side), field visits. City of Brea | On-Call | Professional Construction Materials and Soils Testing Services Brea, CA Koury Engineering has an On-Call Contract with the City of Brea for geotechnical and materials and testing services including geotechnical monitoring, soils testing and investigations, and various materials and testing services. City of Brea | The Tracks at Brea - Segment 6 Kraemer Blvd. to Surveyor Ave. Project Description: This project consists of the construction of a multi-use trail that is approximately 3,500 linear feet in length consisting of a bike trail and hiking trail. The construction includes but is not limited to the following: preparation and implementation of the SWPPP and WQMP measures, demolition, grading, drainage, signing, striping, placement of decomposed granite, asphalt concrete pavement, aggregate base, sidewalks, concrete curb and gutters, wall construction, gates, fencing, driveway approach, storm drain, weed abatement, hydro-seeding, planting, irrigation, lighting infrastructure, site amenities, plant establishment and maintenance. Bike lane striping and signs will be installed from Surveyor Avenue via Nasa Street to Valencia Avenue. Project Scope: Periodic site visits and observation for quality control purposes. Observation and testing compaction during grading operations, including removal and re-compaction of fills, testing compaction of subgrades, and compaction of base, and all related laboratory tests. Koury additional scope for Lambert Rd and Kraemer Blvd consisted of providing the City with a certified Caltrans technician as QA/QC lab Client: City of Brea Contact: Raymond Contreras Assistant Engineer (714) 990-7763 raymondc@cityofbrea.net Project Duration: Feb 2017 - May 2017 Client: City of Brea Contact: Raymond Contreras Assistant Engineer (714) 990-7763 raymondc@cityofbrea.net Project Duration: July 2017 - Dec 2017 709 20-1405 page 24 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc. has over 25 years of experience (since 1992) performing Geotechnical Engineering Services, as well as Materials and Soils Inspection and Testing Services, for cities and municipalities throughout Southern California. ACTIVE / CURRENT ON-CALL AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES County of Los Angeles - Department of Public Works | NTE $2,000,000 | Since 2013Scope: Building Inspections County of San Bernardino - Architecture & Engineering Dept. | NTE $750,000Scope: Materials Testing, Inspection, and other Geotechnical Services Orange County Sanitation District | Not to exceed $ 325,000 | Since 2013 Scope: Materials Testing, Inspection, and other Geotechnical Services City of Brea - Public Works Department | Not to exceed $50,000 Scope: Materials and Soils Testing for various capital improvement projects City of Corona - Department of Water and Power | NTE $600,000 | Since 2009Scope: Materials Testing, Inspection, and other Geotechnical Services City of Moreno Valley - Capital Improvement Projects | Not to exceed $350,000Scope: Materials Testing and Geotechnical Engineering City of Chino Hills - Public Works Projects | Not to exceed $250,000Scope: Geotechnical Services and Materials Testing City of Norwalk - Road Rehabilitation ProjectsScope: Materials Testing and Geotechnical Engineering OTHER MUNICIPALITIES WHERE KOURY HAS BEEN ON AN ON-CALL OR A PROJECT: City of Santa Monica, City of Beverly Hills, City of Riverside, City of Bell, City of Pomona, City of Irvine, City of Torrance, City of Cerritos, City of South El Monte, City of Lake Elsinore, City of Long Beach, Port of Long beach, Central Basin Water District, and more. 710 20-1405 page 25 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services References On-Call Construction Materials and Soil Testing Services (07/2012 - Current)CITY OF SANTA MONICASebastian Felbeck, Construction Manager1437 4th Street, Suite 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401(310) 458-2205, sebastian.felbeck@smgov.net Scope of work: On-call, geotechnical review of reports submitted by developer’s consultants/ engineers for the City of Santa Monica Building & Safety Division. Geotechnical aspects of this project include grading, utility trench backfill, subgrade, aggregate base, and asphalt concrete (AC) paving. All testing complies with the projects requirements and specifications, and geotechnical report was provided at project closeout. On-Call | Geotechnical and Seismic Engineering, Construction Inspection and Materials Testing Services(09/2012 - Current) CITY OF BEVERLY HILLSJi Kim, Associate Project Manager 455 N. Rexford Dr, Beverly Hills, CA 90210(310) 288-2817, jikim@beverlyhills.org Scope of work: provide quality control including inspection and laboratory testing for concrete, rebar, mix designs, welding, structural reinforced concrete, asphalt concrete and provide geotechnical services including soils compaction testing, sieve analysis, expansion index, subsurface exploration, compaction, moisture testing, and more. Also prepare reports containing project approach, field investigation, laboratory tests and results, analysis of field and lab data and recommendations for construction. On-Call Construction Materials and Soil Testing Services (07/2015 - Current)CITY OF BREARaymond Contreras, Assistant Engineer One Civic Center Circle, Brea, CA 92821(714) 990-7763, raymondc@cityofbrea.net Scope of work: Capital improvement projects including street improvements, traffic safety enhancements, water improvements, storm drain improvements, sewer improvements, facility improvements, annual maintenance projects such as slurry seal, sidewalk replacement, sewer mainline relining and water improvements. Koury tested concrete strength, checked subgrade compaction, asphalt overlay compaction, plant inspection for concrete and hot asphalt. Our inspectors made sure City QAP and Caltrans procedures were adhered to and maintained eyewitness records.On-Call Dept. of Water and Power Engineering and Consulting Services (09/2014 - Current) CITY OF CORONAMoses Cortez, Park Superintendent 755 Public Safety Way, Corona, CA(951) 817-5769, moses.cortez@ci.corona.ca.us Scope of work: provide quality control including inspection and laboratory testing for concrete, rebar, mix designs, welding, structural reinforced concrete, asphalt concrete and provide geotechnical services including soils compaction testing, sieve analysis, expansion index, subsurface exploration, compaction, moisture testing, and more. Also prepare reports containing project approach, field investigation, laboratory tests and results, analysis of field and lab data and recommendations for construction. City of Bell Street Rehabilitation Project FY 2016/2017 On Various Streets, (01/2016 - Current) CITY OF BELLKevin Ho, Assistant Engineer6330 Pine Avenue, Bell, CA 90201(323) 463-4100 , kho@cityofbell.org Scope of work: On-call geotechnical services for street rehabilitation projects on various city streets our firm is currently assisting in providing pavement and subsurface investigations for proper pavement design. Corona Ave between Randolph St and Gage Ave, Gifford Ave between Randolph St and Gage Ave, Mayflower Ave between Mayflower Pl and Florence Ave, Bell Ave between Atlantic Ave and California Ave, Crafton Ave between Gage Ave and Florence Ave 711 20-1405 page 26 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena Jacques Roy, P.E., G.E. Project Supporting Engineer Years of Experience: 30+ Education: M.S., Geotechnical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Canada, B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Sherbrook Registrations/Certifications: Geotechnical Engineer, 2077, California, 1988 Civil Engineer, 35386, California, 1982 Mr. Roy has more than 30 years of experience in the construction industry. He has performed a wide variety of geotechnical hazard investigations and reports for earthwork design and construction, including roads, bridges, residential, commercial, recreational, and public facilities. He performs field investigations, data analysis, prepares laboratory programs, supervises laboratory testing, verifies test results and computations, interprets data, and performs geotechnical construction supervision, project management, technical review, and quality assurance. Mr. Roy has planned, conducted, and supervised geotechnical exploration, prepared grading plan reviews, geotechnical reports for foundation design and construction, pavement design, and retaining wall and utility construction. In conjunction with land development, he has performed geologic/seismic studies and provided earthquake response spectra. Mr. Roy has performed several liquefaction studies. Such studies involved field exploration and laboratory testing, including specialized testing and characterization of ground shaking. He has also provided recommendations to mitigate the effects of liquefaction. He supervised the observation and testing during grading, construction of shallow and deep foundations and utility installation for these facilities. City of Santa Monica | Wastewater Main Replacement | Santa Monica, CA Geotechnical Engineer Project consisted of the removal and replacement of an existing six-inch sewer main, with a new eight-inch sewer main. Existing manholes were refurbished and new manholes were installed. Koury supported the City with geotechnical inspection and testing, including compaction testing, pipe zone backfill compaction, trench backfill compaction, asphalt concrete pavement sampling and testing, and concrete pavement sampling and testing. City of Brea | Lambert Road Rehab Phase II | Brea CA Principal in charge Principal and Geotechnical Engineer for the Structural investigation and pavement analysis that included a street rehabilitation of Lambert Road from Tamarack Avenue to State College Boulevard. Our services included pavement deflection testing along existing pavement on the roadway, pavement core sampling within the existing roadway, laboratory testing and issuance of the final report. Orange County Sanitation District | State College Blvd. 10” Sewer Pipe Geotechnical Engineer Project Manager and Geotechnical Engineer for the geotechnical study consisting of lowering the grade of State College Boulevard below the BNSF Railroad. All utilities located along State College and arterial streets had to be realigned; the majority were relocated in a non-exclusive easement on private property located east of the eastern most right of way boundary. OCSD facilities consisted of a 10 to 12-inch sewer located along the west side of State College Boulevard and an 18-inch sewer located along the east side of State College Boulevard. PROFESSIONAL PROFILE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE 712 20-1405 page 27 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Santa Monica | Geotechnical Report Reviewer | Santa Monica CA Geotechnical Engineer Performed review of geotechnical reports for residential developments, commercial developments, and recreational facilities on behalf of the City of Santa Monica City of Bell | Street Rehab 13/14 and Intersection Mods at Gage/Walker | Bell , CA Principal in charge Principal and Geotechnical Engineer for the observation and testing. Our services included subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis, and recommendations for design and construction. The project called for renovating the administrative building, one classroom building, auditorium, and science building. Ten existing buildings will be demolished and nine new buildings will be constructed. The pavements will be reconstructed and the playfields may be reconfigured. City of Orange | Shaffer Park Renovation | Geotechnical Engineering Services | Orange, CA Principal in charge Principal and Geotechnical Engineer for the observation and testing. Our services included reviewing the Shaffer Park Conceptual and existing topography plans. Perform a field investigation to observe the surface conditions and to decide on the adequate number and depth of borings needed for the preparation of a soils report. Provide surface exploration. Obtain and analyze an adequate number of soil samples to furnish information to the City of Orange Staffing for building, Park amenity foundations and sport field pole lighting. Perform two percolation tests to determine if soils are suitable for a proposed bio-swale. Laboratory testing and analysis of the soil samples shall be done to determine soil classifications and evaluate relevant engineering properties including determination of bearing capacities, anticipated settlements, expansive characteristics, and compaction requirements, especially in the area under the building pads. City of Santa Monica | On-Call Deputy Inspections for Various City Projects 2011-2016 and 2017- Current | Santa Monica, CA Principal in charge Principal and Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Koury supported the City with registered engineers and qualified inspection staff to ensure quality testing and inspection on projects throughout the City of Santa Monica. Major Projects included Robson Ave & Marine St. Reconstruction, Palisades Garden Walk & Town Square project, and City Wide Percolation Testing. Galivan Reclaimed Water Pump Station and Reservoir | Moulton Niguel Water District | Mission Viejo, CA Principal in charge Project engineer for geotechnical exploration, liquefaction evaluation, grading plan review, and recommendations for site grading, foundation design and construction on the soft alluvium for a 1-Million Gallon Reservoir Near Interstate Freeway 5 and Crown Valley Parkway. City of Santa Monica | Tongva Park Observation Hill Settling Investigation | Santa Monica, CA Geotechnical Engineer Koury supported the City with construction of a seven acre municipal park on the land west of the City Hall Building within the Civic Center Campus. This area also consisted of a six acre Palisades Garden Walk west on main street and a one acre Town Square in front of the City Hall Building. This included landscaping and several on grade one story structures. Mr Roy was the Geotechnical Engineer for the geotechnical settling investigation. 713 20-1405 page 28 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena 714 20-1405 page 29 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena Michael Molina Vice President of Client Success PROFESSIONAL PROFILE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Years of Experience: 22+ Education: Construction Technology, Riverside Community College, Norco, CA Registrations/Certs: American Welding Society AWS - CWI - Certified welding inspector No. #15111711 ACI - Concrete Field Testing Technician – Grade l ICC - California Commercial Building Inspector, Master of Special Inspection, Structural Steel, Masonry, Prestressed Concrete Special Inspector, Reinforced Concrete Special Inspector, Spray-Applied Fireproofing Special Inspector CTM - 504, 518, 533, 539, 540, and 557 Nuclear Gauge Certified Mr. Molina has over twenty years of experience in the construction industry and also has hands-on experience involved with our field technician and inspecton team. Mr. Molina is responsible for managing dispatch and field personnel to provide quality customer service. Mr. Molina’s duties include monitoring projects to ensure adequate inspection and testing personnel are provided, materials are sampled as required for quantity, oversight of integrity of field personnel and quality control purposes. He also makes on-site visits to guarantee the adherence to industry standards and procedures by field personnel. City of Glendale | Pennsylvania Avenue Rehabilitation Project Managing Project Engineer Mr. Molina was in charge of overseeing the day-to-day operations and organization of this project. His duties included helping to dispatch inspectors to site locations, making site visits to ensure we are providing the utmost quality service, and overseeing our in-house operations department, including conducting quality control concerning all payroll and billing. City of Santa Monica Firestation #1 | Santa Monica, CA Managing Project Engineer Mr. Molina was in charge of overseeing the day-to-day operations and organization of this project. His duties included helping to dispatch inspectors to site locations, making site visits to ensure we are providing the utmost quality service, and overseeing our in-house operations department, including conducting quality control concerning all payroll and billing. City of Beverly Hills | Library Admin Staff Office Remodel Managing Project Engineer Mr. Molina was in charge of overseeing the day-to-day operations and organization of this project. His duties included helping to dispatch inspectors to site locations, making site visits to ensure we are providing the utmost quality service, and overseeing our in-house operations department, including conducting quality control concerning all payroll and billing. Orange County Sanitation District - On-Call - Various Projects Managing Project Engineer Mr. Molina was in charge of overseeing the day-to-day operations and organization of this project. His duties included helping to dispatch inspectors to site locations, making site visits to ensure we are providing the utmost quality service, and overseeing our in-house operations department, including conducting quality control concerning all payroll and billing. 715 20-1405 page 30 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena Mike Mohajeran Project Engineer Years of Experience: 15+ Education: MSc. in Civil Geotechnical Engineering, California State University of Fullerton, 2012 BS & MS in Computer Science, Technical University of Vienna, Vienna-Austria, 1998 Registrations/Certs: FE/EIT Certificate Nuclear Gauge Certified Radiation Safety Officer ICC: Concrete ACI: Concrete Grade 1 40-Hour HAZWOPER Training Qualified SCRRA/Metrolink rules and safety training On track for PE exam Mr. Mohajeran has several years of experience in the construction industry. He has worked as a Project Field Engineer performing subsurface investigations for residential, commercial, and public works projects. He has also acted as Field Supervisor for projects that included grading observation, soil and asphalt testing, and nuclear gauge testing during construction. Mr. Mohajeran is also trained in reviewing, interpreting and summarizing laboratory test data for engineering analysis. He is also skilled in reviewing grading and slope stability, shallow and deep foundations, and seismic hazards. City of Santa Monica | Wastewater Main Replacement | Santa Monica, CA Project Engineer Project consisted of the removal and replacement of an existing six-inch sewer main, with a new eight-inch sewer main. Existing manholes were refurbished and new manholes were installed. Koury supported the City with geotechnical inspection and testing, including the soils compaction testing, pipe zone backfill compaction, trench zone backfill compaction, asphalt concrete pavement sampling and testing, and concrete pavement sampling and testing. City of Bell | Street Rehab 13/14 and Intersection Mods at Gage/Walker | Bell , CA Project Engineer Our services included subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis, and recommendations for design and construction. Mike provided review of plans, and specifications during design stage to see if recommendations were properly interpreted On-Call | Geotechnical and Seismic Engineering, Construction Inpsection and Materials Testing Services - Bevelery Hills, CA Project Engineer Geotechnical aspects of this project consisted of grading of the building pad, utility trench backfill, concrete paving over base material, and subgrade preparation for the flatworks. Mike provided review of plans, and specifications during design stage to see if recommendations were properly interpreted. City of Brea - Lambert Road Rehab Phase II - Brea, CA Project Engineer Structural investigation and pavement analysis for the street rehabilitation of Lambert Road from Tamarack Ave to State College Blvd. Services included pavement deflection testing along existing pavement on the roadway, pavement core sampling within the existing roadway, laboratory testing. Mike provided review of plans, and specifications during design stage to see if recommendations were properly interpreted. PROFESSIONAL PROFILE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE 716 20-1405 page 31 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena Michael Carrillo Operations Manager Years of Experience: 33+ Education: San Bernardino Valley College Registrations/Certs: CPN/Troxler Nuclear Gauge Certification Radiation Safety Officer ACI Certified Technician ACI Certified Trainer ICC Reinforced Concrete/ Structural Masonry/Soils ASTM Certified C1064, C172, C143, C138, C231, C173 and C31 Nuclear Gauge Certified Mr. Carrillo has over 33 years of experience in soils and materials testing for various types of projects. and has been a field supervisor/manager for over 21 years. As an operations manager, Mr. Carrillo is responsible for providing overview of construction inspection of soil and concrete on DSA school construction projects, public works projects, and residential, commercial, and industrial developments. Michael is experienced in field density testing of soils with sand cone, drive tube and nuclear gauge test methods. He is also experienced in concrete, structural masonry and asphalt concrete inspection and testing, oversight of our field personnel and quality control. He also makes on-site visits to guarantee the adherence to industry standards and procedures by field personnel. PROFESSIONAL PROFILE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE City of Santa Fe Springs | Soils Investigation Streets for Soils Analysis | Santa Fe Springs, CA Project Engineer Responsible for overall review of project inspection and testing services that included observation of trench backfilling around newly constructed primary sludge thickening facilities and compaction testing of soils. On-Call Contract for Consulting Sevices - City of Beverly Hills | Beverly Gardens Restroom | World On Its Hind Legs Art Piece Burton Way Median Managing Project Engineer Responsible for Quality Assurance Inspections. Geotechnical and Seismic Engineering, Construction Inpsection and Materials Testing Services City of Glendale | Pennsylvania Avenue Rehabilitation Project Managing Project Engineer Soils Investigation - responsible for overall review of project inspection and testing services that included observation of trench backfilling around newly constructed primary sludge thickening facilities and compaction testing of soils. City of Santa Monica Firestation #1 | Santa Monica, CA Managing Project Engineer Responsible for overall review of project inspection and testing services that include shoring operation, grading of the building pad, utility trench backfill, concrete paving over base material, and subgrade preparation for the flatworks. City of Beverly Hills | Library Admin Staff Office Remodel Managing Project Engineer Responsible for Quality Assurance Inspections. Geotechnical and Seismic Engineering, Construction Inpsection and Materials Testing Services 717 20-1405 page 32 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena Jeff Lantosh Field Supervisor Years of Experience: 11+ Education: Crafton Hills College- EMT Training/General Education Registrations/Certs: Nuclear Gauge Certification ACI Certified Technician ACI Certified Trainer ICC Structural Masonry, Pre-stressed Concrete, Reinforced Concrete, and Soils Inspector Caltrans- “ Certificate of Proficiency” Mr. Lantosh has over eleven years of experience in observation, inspection and testing in soils, reinforced concrete and masonry testing for various types of projects. As an ICC Special Inspector, Jeff is responsible for providing inspection of soil, concrete, and masonry on public works projects, residential, commercial, and industrial developments. He is experienced in field density testing of soils with sand cone and nuclear gauge test methods. He is also experienced in concrete, masonry, and asphalt concrete inspection. Mr. Lantosh has 3 years of field supervisor experience. As a field supervisor Mr. Lantosh’s duties include project document review, oversite of field technicians and inspectors, attending meetings, and client outreach. PROFESSIONAL PROFILE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE 200 N Center Street | Soils Investigation | Los Angeles, CA Field Supervisor Mr. Lantosh provided field supervision for the soils investigation - responsible for overall review of project inspection and testing services that included observation of trench backfilling around newly constructed primary sludge thickening facilities and compaction testing of soils. City of Santa Fe Springs | Soils Investigation Streets for Soils Analysis | Santa Fe Springs, CA Field Supervisor Mr. Lantosh was responsible for overall review of inspection and testing services that included observation of trench backfilling around newly constructed primary sludge thickening facilities and compaction testing of soils. Valencia Water Reclamation Plant Advanced Water Treatment Facility | QC Valencia, CA Field Supervisor The work consists of construction of an advanced water treatment facility (microfiltration, nanofiltration, enhanced membrane system), metal building, electrical and control room, electrical substation and transformers for a new power service, duct banks and electrical conduit, underground utilities, instrumentation and piping systems, fire prevention systems, above ground tanks (concrete, plastic, steel), concrete structures, truck loading station, pump stations, asphalt roads, chemical storage and cleaning systems, metal canopies, site improvements, and all appurtenant work. Mr. Lantosh was responsible for overall review of inspection and testing services. On-Call Contract for Consulting Sevices - City of Beverly Hills | Beverly Gardens Restroom | World On Its Hind Legs Art Piece Burton Way Median Field Supervisor Mr. Lantosh provided on- site inspection of materials including concrete and soils testing for the waterline replacement for Idyllwild Water District. 718 20-1405 page 33 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena Joey Martinez Laboratory Manager Years of Experience: 5+ Registrations/Certs: ACI: Concrete Strength Testing Technician - Concrete Field Testing Technician - Grade 1 ASTM: A90, A370, A615, A706, E605, F606, D3039, F3125 Caltrans Certified PROFESSIONAL PROFILE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE City of Torrance | Del Amo Boulevard Extension, Phase 2, Laboratory Manager For several years, our lab has been providing support to the many projects for Los Angeles County District. Mr. Martinez coordinated project testing schedules for rebar, concrete, masonry, and structural steel samples delivered to the lab on a daily basis for the City of Torrance. On-Call | Geotechnical and Seismic Engineering, Construction Inpsection and Materials Testing Services - Bevelery Hills, CA Laboratory Manager Koury lab provides support to the many projects for the City of Beverly Hills. Mr. Mar-tinez coordinates multiple project testing schedules for rebar and concrete samples delivered to the lab on a daily basis. City of Santa Monica | Fire Station #1 Laboratory Manager For several years, our lab has been providing support to the many projects for City of Santa Monica. Mr. Martinez coordinates multiple testing schedules for rebar and con-crete samples delivered to the lab on a daily basis or the City of Santa Monica’s Fire Station #1 project. City of Glendale | Pennsylvania Avenue Rehabilitation Project Laboratory Manager Koury Engineering has provided support to the many projects County of Los Ange-les District. Mr. Martinez coordinated multiple project testing schedules for aggregate samples delivered to the lab on a daily basis. City of Glendale - Kenneth Road Rehabilitation Laboratory Manager For the past several years, our lab has been providing support to the many projects the City of Glendale has required services for. Mr. Martinez coordinates multiple project testing schedules for rebar and concrete samples delivered to the lab on a daily basis. Mr. Martinez has over 5 years of experience in the construction industry. He works both in the field and as our in-house Laboratory Manager. This consists of fleet management, equipment inventory and calibrations, training for all lab personnel, and maintaining accreditations for LA County, San Diego County, AMRL, CCRL, CalTrans, Army Corps of Engineers and DSA to name a few. Mr. Martinez is in charge of coordinating sample deliveries and their respective testing schedules. His extensive experience and knowledge provide our Lab with a code and standards expert for all our materials testing; giving lab personnel the support they need for continual training and certification renewals. 719 Years of Lab Experience: 18+ Registrations/Certs: Lab CTM - 105, 106, 201 ,202, 207, 216, 217, 226, 227 Expert in: Max density curves, relative compaction tests, sieve analysis, direct shear 3-point, remolded direct shear, consolidation w/o time rate, specific gravity for coarse aggregate, swell/ collapse, atterberg limits, sand equivalent, expansion index, moisture content, hydrometer, AC Marshall, compression strength, cleanness of coarse aggregate, clay lumps, organic impurities, field vane shear tests, penetration resistance of fine-grained soils Mr. Perry has over 18 years of experience as a laboratory and field technician. He has worked for Koury for the past 10 years, and has vast experience working on highway, road, transportation, local municipalities, and private development projects. Matthew holds several Caltrans certifications and maintains the laboratory certifications required to perform Caltrans testing, aggregate testing, CCRL and AMRL. He performs geotechnical lab testing in a timely and prompt manner. He also prepares finished copies of lab reports for clients and engineers. Mr. Perry uses Geo-Systems and Excel to prepare reports, as and ensures the overall quality and efficiency of our soils lab to mitigate the effects of liquefaction have also been provided. He supervised the observation and testing during grading, construction of shallow and deep foundations as well as the utility installation for facilities. Street Resurfacing Soil Investigation - City of Bell Soils Lab Manager Soils and Materials Testing on compaction of asphalt paving, soil laboratory testing on retained samples, R-Values testing, expansion index, maximum dry density and moisture content. Gage Avenue Improvement Project - City of Bell Soils Lab Manager Performed geotechnical lab tests and monitoring Street Rehab 13/14 and Intersection Mods at Gage/Walker - City of Bell Soils Lab Manager The pavement(s) were reconstructed and the playfields reconfigured. The investigation included over 60 borings, cone penetration tests, percolation tests, and liquefaction and seismic analyses. I-10 Cherry Ave and Citrus Ave Interchanges - Fontana, CA Soils Lab Manager Soils and Materials Testing, and asphalt testing Iowa Grade Avenue Separation - Riverside, CA Soils Lab Manager Performed soils and materials testing Metro Division 13 - Bus Maintenance and Operations Facility - Los Angeles, CA Soils Lab Manager Performed compaction test, evaluated soil and rock properties PROFESSIONAL PROFILE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Matthew Perry Soils Lab Manager 720 20-1405 page 35 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena Years of Experience: 6+ Education: Bachelor of Science in Geology; California State University - Northridge - 2014 Registrations/Certifications: ICC: Grading Irvine: Reinforced Concrete Los Angeles: Grading Deputy Long Beach: Driven Piles CTM: 105, 106, 201, 202, 206, 207, 2016, 217, 226, 227, 231 ICC Soils: 20162020 Cal Trans Testing: 206, 216, 2014 - Present ACI: Concrete Grade 1 40-Hour HAZWOPER Training Nuclear Gauge Certified TWIC Mr. Buffet has over six years of experience. He has extensive experience of laboratory soils testing and on site geotechnical services and drilling. While on site, he ensures that design drawing and specified building codes are followed. He is a certified nuclear gauge specialist, ICC soils (EC), ACI Field I, ASTM, and CalTrans specialist. Mr. Buffet provides inspection and observation for soils, masonry and concrete. He has performed the sampling and testing of materials as required for each specialty and project. Albert is able to perform soil classification, grading, trenching, mixing, paving, coring, environmental testing, and traffic control. Soils Investigations “Conducting drilling operations” staking boring locations, arranging digalert and drill crew, complete field and digital boring logs, perform SPT, CD, and Bulk Samples. City of Santa Monica | Firestation #1 Soils Technician | Geotechnical Monitoring Geotechnical - Soils technician for material observation, and testing during construction of asphalt concrete, and compaction testing of soil and base materials. City of Beverly Hills | 3rd Street Tour Bus Station and Restrooms Soils Technician | Geotechnical Monitoring Geotechnical - Soils technician for material observation, and testing during construction of asphalt concrete, and compaction testing of soil and base materials. Port of Long Beach | Harbor Scenic Dr. & Pier J Intersection Improvements Harbor Scenic Dr Soils Technician | Geotechnical Monitoring Geotechnical - Soils technician for material observation, and testing during construction of asphalt concrete, and compaction testing of soil and base materials. City of Sante fe Springs | Street Improvements Greenleaf Ave Between Los Nietos Rd and Telegraph Rd Soils Technician | Geotechnical Monitoring Geotechnical - Soils technician for material observation, and testing during construction of asphalt concrete, and compaction testing of soil for trench backfill. City of Brea | The Tracks at Brea - Segment 6 Kraemer Blvd. to Surveyor Ave. Soils Technician | Geotechnical Monitoring Geotechnical - Soils technician for material observation, and testing during construction of asphalt concrete, and compaction testing of soil for trench backfill. City of Corona, West Rincon St. Reclaimed Waterline Extension PH II - Corona, CA Soils Technician | Geotechnical Monitoring Geotechnical - Soils technican observed and performed compaction testing. PROFESSIONAL PROFILE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Albert Buffet Geologist | LA Grading Deputy | Geotechnical Inspector 721 20-1405 page 36 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Availabilty of Key Personnel We have over 100+ inspectors in the field daily, on average, with the ability to double our current workload. We have an incredible dispatch team that is a capable of matching experienced inspectors and providing experienced testing professionals for several large and complex projects under construction over the next 12-24 months. Staff Availability Koury’s proactive management style allows our team to work simultaneous projects without impacting construction schedules. Based on our current workload, our key staff has on average more than 75% availability to the City of Hermosa Beach. Our designated Field Inspectors and Technicians will be available immediately for this project, capable of having 100% commitment to the project construction, even while completing other project work. The response time from Koury to the City will be prompt and attentive. Our team understands construction is dynamic and has procedures in place to accommodate urgent and last minute requests. Should we be selected, we anticipate completing all tasks in accordance with the project schedule. Through our staffing management and large pool of inspector and technicians, we will be able to fulfill all of the City’s requirements. Key Personnel Project Role Workload Current 6 mo.Anticipated Jacques B. Roy, P.E., G.E.Principal Geotechnical Engineer 85%95% Micheal Molina Vice President od Client Services 95%100% Michael Carrillo Operations Manager 95%100% Constance Ray Project Management 95%100% Mike Mohajeran Project Managing Engineer 85%100% Jeffery Lantosh Field Supervisor 80%90% Joseph Martinez Laboratory Manager 50%100% Soils Technicians Field Staff N/A 100% Deputy Inspectors Field Staff N/A 100% After contract execution, Koury will notify the City with prior written approval if there are changes in key personnel and the key personnel that will be subsituted with shall have all the necessary credentials to qualify him/her as a project manager for this project. Koury will not be utilitzing a sub-consultant and will request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from the City prior to use of a sub-consultant on the contract. In the event there are proposed changes in key personnel, including sub-consultants, during the term of the agreement that are outside of the Koury’s control, the consultant shall prepare a transition plan that is presented to the City’s project manager for review 722 20-1405 page 37 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services Required FormsRequired Forms City of Hermosa Beach Department of Public Works Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 20-01 On-Call Geotechnical Services in the City of Hermosa Beach, California 723 20-1405 page 38 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3 Required Forms 6.3.1 Certification of Proposal RFQ #: _________ The undersigned hereby submits its proposal and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal (RFQ). 1. Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Proposal, Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. 2. By submitting the response to this request, Proposer agrees, if selected to furnish services to the City in accordance with this RFQ. 3. Proposer has carefully reviewed its proposal and understands and agrees that the City is not responsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the Proposer and that the Proposer is responsible for them. 4. It is understood and agreed that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals and to waive any informality or irregularity in any proposal received by the City. 5. The proposal response includes all of the commentary, figures and data required by the Request for Proposal 6. The proposal shall be valid for 90 days from the date of submittal. 7. Proposer acknowledges that the City may issue addendums related to this RFQ and that the proposer has reviewed the following addendums which have been issued: Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ 8. Proposer further acknowledges the provisions of any addendums issued have been incorporated into their proposal. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 31 34 Nicole Miller | Vice President of Sales 20-01 724 20-1405 page 39 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit RFQ #: _________ The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1.This proposal is not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation. 2.This proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham. 3.I have not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Proposer to put in a false or sham proposal and I have not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any other Proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal or to refrain from submitting to this RFQ. 4.I have not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price or to fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the proposal price or to secure any advantage against the City of Hermosa Beach or of anyone interested in the proposed contract. 5.All statements contained in the Proposal and related documents are true. 6.I have not directly or indirectly submitted the proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any person, corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, RFQ depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. 7.I have not entered into any arrangement or agreement with any City of Hermosa Beach public officer in connection with this proposal. 8.I understand collusive bidding is a violation of State and Federal law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 32 34 20-01 Nicole Miller | Vice President of Sales 725 20-1405 page 40 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements RFQ #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with the City’s insurance requirements contained within this RFQ. The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1. Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the insurance requirements as specified in the Request for Proposal. 2. If selected, proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 33 34 20-01 Nicole Miller | Vice President of Sales 726 20-1405 page 41 Koury Engineering and Testing, Inc. (909) 606-6111 www.kouryengineering.com Chino · Gardena City of Hermosa Beach | On-Call Geotechnical Services RFQ 20-01 City of Hermosa Beach 6.3.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement RFQ #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City’s Professional Services Agreement. Proposers should identify and/or indicate any exceptions to the Sample Professional Services Agreement included in Section 6.2. The City Attorney or their designee retains the discretion to accept or reject proposed exceptions or modifications to the City’s Professional Services Agreement. 1.Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the conditions specified in the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement. 2.Proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein with exceptions noted as follows: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page of 34 34 20-01 Nicole Miler | Vice President of Sales 727 Steven Koch, Senior Vice President MTGL, INC. | 2992 E. LA PALMA AVENUE, SUITE A, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92806 P: 714.632.2999 | F: 714.632.2974 | WWW.MTGLINC.COM RFQ NO. 20‐01 ON‐CALL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH “Providing Value in Quality Services” City Clerk Office Attention: Romany Basilyous 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Due Date: February 18, 2020, 5:00 p.m. PST 728 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................. 1 3.2.1 Cover Letter ............................................................................................................................. 2 3.2.2 Firm Profile ............................................................................................................................ 3‐5 3.2.3 Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work ....................................................... 5‐8 3.2.4 Project Management Plan ................................................................................................... 8‐10 3.2.5 Experience and Qualifications ........................................................................................... 11‐22 3.2.6 Required Forms ................................................................................................................. 23‐27 3.2.7 Fee Schedule .............................................................. Please see in a Separate Sealed Envelope page |1729 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental February 18, 2020 Attention: Romany Basilyous City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk Office 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Subject: Response to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 20‐01 City of Hermosa Beach – On‐Call Geotechnical Services MTGL is proposing to provide on‐call, as needed inspection services. Inspection will be provided for conformance to the contract soil recommendations, and the items requiring inspection as defined by the City of Hermosa Beach permit. Inspections are provided to support public works and capital programs for construction activities in a timely and efficient manner. The laboratory is certified as an ISO 17025 Accredited facility by the State and Highway Transportation Officials. MTGL’s invoices include full back‐up for transparency. MTGL’s monthly invoice is accompanied by a running total of the contract balance tracking budget and progress from month to month. Authorized signatures are required for each report and MTGL will seek approval for overtime. MTGL is implementing a cloud based, real time reporting system to allow off site monitoring of presence. A GPS tracker identifies when the inspector is on site to record time. Real time reports can be obtained anytime throughout the day by our clients. Inspectors will use I ‐pads, or computers for communications as well as plans and specs for our inspections. MTGL has been in business since September of 1993 (26) years providing horizontal and vertical construction inspection and testing. Bruce Hick and Pablo Naranjo are MTGL’s supervising Geotechnical/Materials engineers and our laboratory managed by Charlie Ferguson. Our friendly dispatchers are available Monday – Friday, 7AM‐4PM, with cell service for off hour needs if necessary. MTGL is a registered small (SBE), disadvantaged (DBE), woman owned (WBE), (MBE) minority business enterprise. MTGL currently has over 77 full‐time employees including Geotechnical Engineers, Deputy Inspectors, and Soils Technicians experienced in inspection. It will be our staff’s goal to earn the business with service and consistent value. During the review process, please contact me at my office (800) 491‐2990 x2114. Respectfully Submitted, MTGL, Inc. Steven Koch Senior Vice President page |2730 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental 3.2.2 FIRM PROFILE MTGL has over 26 years of extensive experience in providing an array of quality oversight and design services including services for this contract including materials testing, construction inspection, pavement engineering, and laboratory testing services. We provide these services to different projects across every County in Southern California on the daily basis. MTGL’s staff of service professionals include Registered Civil Engineers, Registered Geotechnical Engineers, Material Testers, Plant Inspectors, and Construction Inspectors skilled in Roadway and Heavy Civil Construction. MTGL is totally owned individual. MTGL is certified as a W/MBE, SBE and DBE firm under CUCP 33843, and registered as a public works contractor with the State of California under DIR 1000006646. MTGL has a clear understanding of Safety Compliance on all projects, with policies in place that provide a desirable EMR Rating of 0.68. Additionally, MTGL maintains a $10 Million insurance policy and can meet the City of Hermosa Beach insurance requirements. MTGL has no failures or refusals to complete a contract. MTGL’s goal is to provide continuity of personnel, quick response time, and accuracy of our reporting. Our approach to projects reflects our core values of efficient responsiveness while maintaining strict technical accuracy from preconstruction to project closure. MTGL adheres to the schedule and budget for each project. FACILITY MTGL is a fully certified by numerous agencies to provide materials testing, inspection, and geotechnical engineering services. Our testing laboratories are fully certified and can provide virtually any tests required. Work for this contract will be serviced out in Anaheim, Orange County, California. Our Anaheim office with laboratory building location size is 8,446 for this contract. Our certifications include: LABORATORY CERTIFICATIONS Agency Expiration Date ISO/IEC 17025 and AASHTO R 18 Bi‐Annual Cement and Concrete Reference Laboratory (CCRL) Inspection No. U1178 02/01/2021 Caltrans Accreditation Laboratory (1 of 15 Laboratories in California; Caltrans DBE Superpave Certified for Hot Mix Asphalt) 01/29/2021 Department of Army – US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 03/01/2020 Division of the State Architect LEA #044 04/06/2020 Los Angeles Department of Building & Safety (LADBS) Approval No. TA24780 05/01/2020 OSHPD OPAA‐0047‐16 04/22/2021 ANAHEIM 2992 E. La Palma Avenue, Suite A, Anaheim, California 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 | Fax: 714.632.2974 | Dispatch: 800.491.2990 Legal Company Name: MTGL, Inc. Established Year: 09/17/1993 Number of Employees: 77 Number of Years in Business: 26 Type of Company: Corporation Business Entity: C1731494 Federal Employer I.D. Number: 33‐0580168 Business Status: M/WBE | SBE | DBE | CBE | DIR Owner: Michelle Sierra Elliott President: Michael Landon Senior Vice President: Steven Koch Engineers: Bruce Hick, P.E., G.E. Pablo Naranjo, P.E., G.E. Stephen Coover, P.E., G.E. Branch Offices: Riverside | El Segundo | Anaheim | San Diego www.mtglinc.com page |3731 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental BUSINESS CERTIFICATIONS Certification # Expiration Date Women/Minority Business Enterprise Supplier Clearinghouse 93KS0069 07/23/2022 Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) 1000006646 06/30/2020 DGS Small Business 1758925 08/31/2021 LACMTA Metro DBE CUCP 33843 01/10/2025 LACMTA Metro SBE 1199 01/10/2025 Coalition of Southern California SBE (Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Port of Long Beach, San Diego County Water Authority, Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles Community College District) 169124 07/09/2022 Omnitrans SBE 281747 10/31/2021 Copies of our actual Laboratory and Business Status Certifications are available upon request. LOCATION Headquarters: 2992 E. La Palma Avenue, Suite A, Anaheim, California 92806 Inland Empire: 14467 Meridian Parkway, Building 2A, Riverside, California 92518 San Diego: 6295 Ferris Square, Suite C, San Diego, California 92121 OUR SERVICES GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Planning and feasibility studies, preliminary and final design, grading and foundation plan reviews, observation, testing, verification and engineering consultation during construction. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Field inspection by registered deputy inspectors. ROOFING INSPECTION Field inspection by qualified technicians. ENGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS Evaluation of existing and damaged structures. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Design, failure investigations, remedial measures. CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING Materials, specifications, quality assurance, expert testimony. PHYSICAL TESTING Construction materials, structural systems. NON‐DESTRUCTIVE Ultrasonic, magnetic particle, dye penetrant. RESEARCH Product and process development, reliability testing. ENVIRONMENTAL / INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Asbestos and lead‐paint based consultation, project design, monitoring and management, remediation planning environmental site assessments, thermographic imaging, indoor air quality testing, mold screening and consultation, water intrusion and investigation. TEAM MTGL Technicians and Testers are trained and multi‐certified with ACI and Caltrans and other regional certifications required for the project. Our engineers are registered in the State of California. They perform Material Testing and Geotechnical Services/Core Sample Services in accordance with the Caltrans Local Assistance Program Manual and/or City Greenbook specifications, and the City’s adopted Quality Assurance Program (QAP). page |4732 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental SUBCONTRACTOR MTGL has the capabilities and staff resources to fulfill all the requirements in‐house, with no need for subconsultants. If needed, MTGL will provide subcontractor if the project requires related services that are outside of our fee schedule, with all subconsultants being pre‐approved. LITIGATION MTGL does not have any contract terminations for default in the past five years. MTGL has not filed bankruptcy in the past five years. Neither MTGL nor its officers have had any convictions or debarments for filing false claims within the past five years. MTGL has never been the sole defendant in any construction related litigation. Currently MTGL is named in litigation with Los Angeles Community College District. Construction defect case at Mission College in Sylmar, California. Previous General Contractor, SMC, filed bankruptcy and MTGL completed this project under a different General Contractor, Kemp Brothers. CONTACT INFORMATION Primary Contact During RFQ Process and Authorized to bind: Steven Koch P: 714.632.2999 | E: skoch@mtglinc.com Engineers/Primary Contact for All Technical Issues: Bruce Hick, P.E., G.E. P: 714.632.2999 | E: bhick@mtglinc.com Pablo Naranjo, P.E., G.E. P: 714.632.2999 | E: pnaranjo@mtglinc.com Contract Authority Signatory: Michael Landon, President P: 714.632.2999 | E: mlandon@mtglinc.com Accounting (Billings)/Contracts: P: 714.632.2999 | E: contracts@mtglinc.com Dispatch: 800.491.2990 3.2.3 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH TO SCOPE OF WORK STATEMENT OF PROJECT UNDERSTANDING We have carefully read all the contents in the RFQ, and fully understand its intent. We understand that the City of Hermosa Beach is seeking Statement of Qualifications from qualified individuals to provide On‐Call Geotechnical Services. We understand the City anticipates a contract start date around April 1, 2020 and term of the agreement shall be for two (2) years. If selected, we will enter into a professional services agreement with the City of Hermosa Beach without exceptions. page |5733 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental SPECIAL INSPECTORS / FIELD TECHNICIANS BENJAMIN FURY TYLELR WITTE CHARLES FERGUSON LABORATORY MANAGER BRUCE HICK, P.E., G.E. PABLO NARANJO, P.E., G.E. GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIAL ENGINEERS Legend: MTGL and City of Hermosa Beach MTGL MTGL Report Distribution CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RFQ 20‐01 ON‐CALL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES DISPATCH 800.491.2990 REPORT DISTRIBUTION LISA SCHNIEDER FRANK MELO, E.I.T. JAY ROWERDINK, E.I.T. PROJECT STAFF ENGINEERS STEVEN KOCH SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR ORGANIZATION CHART APPROACH TO WORK PROGRAM MTGL and its staff have the expertise, capabilities, extensive experiences, knowledge, abilities, and demonstrate resources available to perform Geotechnical Services on an on‐call, and/or as‐needed basis with the City requirements. Below is MTGL typical scope of services, but not limited to: GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS It is our understanding, based on our review of the request for proposal that the Contract may require geotechnical investigations for various capital projects. Geotechnical investigation is required to evaluate the subsurface soil conditions before construction to aid in the design of the projects and dictate required sampling and testing. Accordingly, our investigation will consist of a field exploration, laboratory testing, a review of the compiled data and preparation of a written report containing recommendations in accordance to generally accepted engineering and geologic principles and practices. page |6734 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental Field Investigation The field exploration will consist of the following: Review of literature to obtain background information of regional geology, seismicity and ground water. Examination of aerial photographs. Contacting of underground service alert to locate onsite utility lines. Reconnaissance of the site Drilling of exploratory borings utilizing hollow stem auger drill rig, if required. Logging of the borings and identification of the various earth materials encountered during the exploration. Samples of the major earth units will be obtained and the in‐place density of the various strata encountered in the exploration will be determined. Should groundwater be encountered, the depth to groundwater will be measured 24 hours later and test hole backfilled after the measurement. Laboratory Analysis Laboratory testing will be performed in accordance with the specifications of The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or Caltrans test methods (CTM).The following laboratory tests will be performed on the major soil and bedrock types encountered during the exploration. Atterberg Limits Consolidation Properties of Soil Expansion Index Sand Equivalence Grain Size Analysis Triaxial Shear Tests Unconfined Compressive Strength Direct Shear Test Moisture and density of drive tube samples Maximum density ‐ optimum moisture density R‐Value Corrositivity Analysis Engineering Review and Report Preparation The report will present the results of the field exploration and laboratory testing. It will include information on the nature, distribution and strength of the existing soils, and design recommendations and criteria for corrective measures, as necessary. The geotechnical report will include, but not be limited to, the following information: Soil boring locations and soil boring logs detailing subsurface soil and groundwater conditions Laboratory analyses Pole foundation design parameters including vertical and lateral load capacities Soil properties for horizontal k‐values Lateral earth pressures and liquefaction potential Anticipated settlement Other geotechnical conditions that may affect the design and/or construction Our recommendations will be consistent with sound engineering and geologic practices and shall incorporate federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations which, in our professional opinion, are applicable at the time that our professional services are rendered. FIELD TESTING SERVICES MTGL is fully capable of providing Field Testing and Inspection Services required for the successful completion of City Projects. Our general approach is as follows: Soil Compaction and Grading Our services will consist of compaction testing of the backfills and paved areas on site and within the street right of way. MTGL’s services will consist of performing in place density tests by either the sand cone method (ASTM D1556) or nuclear gauge method (ASTM D2922), water content test, and maximum density optimum moisture test per ASTM D1557 at locations selected by our representative per the geotechnical report requirements. page |7735 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental Trench backfill compaction test will be taken at locations and frequencies in accordance to guidelines provided by applicable requirements. In addition, sub‐grade compaction testing of paved areas on‐site and within the street right of way will be taken at locations and frequencies in accordance to guidelines provided by the City. Test locations will be selected by our technician at locations that represent the surface appearance of the sub‐grade at the time of testing. Additionally, MTGL’s services will provide observations and testing of excavation during grading, rough grading operations, soils tests, and submittal of a soil grading report. Our technician will observe rough grading operations on a full‐time basis. Water content, in place density (compaction), maximum density and optimum moisture, expansion index and soluble sulfate test will be performed at a frequency and at locations selected by the soils engineer. Our laboratory can perform other soils test, if required, subject to prior approval. During the courses of construction, we will notify the City in writing, with a copy to the contractor, if in our opinion, any time the work is not in conformity to the plans and specifications. Upon completion of the work we will prepare a final report for the City which will summarize our observations and the results of all tests performed. The final report will contain recommendations and opinions regarding the conformance of the completed rough grading to the intent of the plans, soil engineering reports, and specifications signed by a California Registered Geotechnical Engineer. Concrete Material Testing Our services will consist of continual concrete inspection during the concrete placement, for conformance to approved plans, specifications, and building codes. During concrete placement our inspector will fabricate four (4) compression test specimens for each 100 cubic yards of concrete placed. MTGL will provide testing at different intervals per request or project requirements. Test cylinders will be cured in our laboratory until they are tested in accordance to ASTM C192. Compression test will be performed in accordance to ASTM C39 at seven (7) and 28 days, respectively or by the City requirement. Copies of the results of all compression tests will be provided upon completion of the test. Asphaltic Concrete Testing Our services will also include laboratory testing of the aggregate base and asphaltic concrete. Services will include Hveem stabilometer, sieve analysis, sand equivalents and R‐Value testing of aggregate base. Tests will be performed on materials sampled at random locations and at frequencies based on the project specifications. Testing requirements for Oil Content of asphalt can be met with our Rapid Ignition Oven, providing real time results to batch plants supplying asphalt. 3.2.4 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN MTGL’s wide range of services helps provide verification of contract compliance with the approved set of plans and specifications, and conformance with Federal/State/Local applicable code requirements. All services performed by qualified personnel are under the supervision of a professional licensed civil engineer. We work closely and communicate with the city, client owner, construction management team, architect, and structural engineer to ensure the project is on budget and on time schedule. We have developed best practices to ensure that our contracts and projects are managed efficiently with an eye to maintaining project schedules and budgets. MTGL has the professional engineers and staff to perform services throughout the City’s service area. MTGL will respond to each request for service with project‐specific scopes of work and detailed in fee proposals. MTGL is prepared to execute Project Specific Agreements for each project awarded. PROJECT KICKOFF Upon notice to proceed, our Project Manager will work with the client representative to gain a thorough understanding of the project and our role. page |8736 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental Our initial meeting will review the following: Project schedule and budget constraints Geological conditions of the project area, i.e. liquefaction potential, groundwater, proximity to faults and/or AP Zone, soil type, etc. Regulatory and jurisdiction approval requirements i.e., Division of State Architect, Caltrans, Municipal Government, Federal Government, DTSC, etc. Contact information for all involved parties including: architect, engineer, contractor, regulatory agencies, suppliers, etc. STAFFING PLAN All requests for services and staffing assignments are coordinated through our central dispatch. Our dispatch, accounting and laboratory results are compiled into the same database allowing for accurate scheduling and billing. At the beginning of each project, we meet with the contractor, project manager and City to review all project documents and the project schedule. Based on the schedule we can anticipate the need for testing and inspection in advance. However, throughout the course of construction, the schedule often changes, with activities being moved up or postponed. To keep track of any changes, our assigned project manager will follow up with the City’s designated project manager and the contractor to determine if any changes to the schedule have been made so that we may change our staffing plan to accommodate. In addition, we have assigned a back‐up technician/inspector to provide services if one of our designated inspectors is unavailable due to unforeseen circumstances. ENSURING CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS MTGL is very aware of the requirements for project certification and closeout. Our role during construction will incorporate daily review of the technicians and inspection activities to define areas that may need to be re‐tested. In some cases, an RFI is issued to the architect for approval. Our corporate policy is to work with the associated subcontractor to rectify the failing areas rapidly as to not interfere with the critical path of construction. In the event the item is not cleared up by means of a re‐test or an RFI response within the first 72 hours, a deficiency log will be created and circulated with each week’s reports until resolved. Our communications at this point will be with the assigned Inspector who will aide in the required corrective actions with the general contractor. We collect verified reports at the completion of each stage of construction while the work at hand is within a short time of the inspector’s assigned duties. The project will ultimately end with an affidavit that all materials and soil has met the approved project documents for certification. DEFICIENCY LOG MTGL will proactively work with all involved parties to ensure that all construction and materials conform to the project plans and specifications. Any deficiency found will be immediately brought to the City’s Representative, Construction Manager, the Contractor and if applicable, the sub‐contractor involved. If the deficiency is not resolved within 72 hours, we will distribute a deficiency log to all parties involved. We will proactively work with the party responsible for the deficiency to ensure that it is resolved. SCHEDULING MTGL DISPATCH: 800.491.2990 All requests for Materials Technicians, geotechnical staff, field technicians, and inspectors will be filled by the following business day if notification is received by 3:00 PM the prior business day. MTGL understands that projects may require last minute requests for testing and inspections. Should a last‐minute request be received, MTGL will assign the next available technician, often the same business day. page |9737 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental TEST DELIVERY TIMELINE MTGL strives to provide test results in a timely manner. Final reports for typical tests are provided within seven (7) calendar days. If requested, preliminary verbal results can be provided within one business day. In the event of sample yields abnormal results or fails a test, we provide verbal notification within two (2) hours, with the final written report delivered within 24 to 48 hours. After a failed test, we fast‐track reporting of subsequent re‐tests and provide a final report within three (3) to four (4) calendar days, or sooner per client request. We monitor re‐ testing of any failed tests to assist the client in regaining costs for inspection of failing tests from the Contractor and Subcontractors. INVOICING/ACCOUNTING MTGL can submit invoices to the City on a weekly/monthly basis that will itemize each task performed, the number of hours worked per person/consultant, the rate per hour for each person/consultant, total contract amount, percent complete for specified work items, and the remaining contract amount, along with labor compliance reports. Billing is done on a weekly basis along with labor compliance reports. Daily reports are sent with each billing as backup to our invoicing. REVIEW PROJECT DELIVERABLES / PROVIDE FINAL CERTIFICATION: MTGL senior staff will review all project deliverables for technical accuracy and suitability to the project requirements. Unsatisfactory deliverables will be revised and resubmitted. Project logs with incomplete entries and/or other open items will be completed, rectified, or closed. If required, a final certification or summary report will be provided based on our review of the project deliverables Provide final project logs Provide final materials report PROJECT CLOSURE MTGL senior staff will review past and outstanding invoices. Invoices requiring clarification or closure will be discussed with the project team members. When all technical and fiscal matters are resolved, the project will be closed. Review project invoices Provide project closure QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL APPROACH MTGL and its staff can provide the same level of expertise in technical services as is required in the Quality Assurance Program (QAP) of the City. MTGL’s Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) has been created to assist our clients in maintaining quality work. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL We maintain our effective QA/QC to measure and verify testing performance throughout the course of the project. We ensure that data requirements are met for accuracy, precision, and completeness during the use of our proven methodologies. We will provide flexibility to allow controlled changes in routine methodology to meet specific contract requirements. Our staff are trained to recognize mistakes as early as possible to provide correction for any factors that adversely affect the quality of the work. We monitor operational performance of the testing on a routine basis, and provide corrective action as needed to meet requirements. We maintain complete records of field observation, sample taking and submittal, laboratory performance, and completed analyses to verify resulting data. MTGL actively monitors and tracks staff certifications and conducts in‐house training for field and laboratory personnel. Our Lab Manager is responsible for the training program and maintenance of all training records. Per corporate policy, the Lab Manager completes a “Technician Training and Evaluation Record” for each technician and copies of the results of all training are distributed to the Registered Engineer for review. Training records are retained in the laboratory office. All materials technicians are trained prior to performing test procedures not previously performed. page |10738 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental 3.2.5 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATION MTGL has provided relevant experience with large private and public sector entities to define abilities for large projects. MTGL wide range of services is verification of contract compliance with the approved set of plans and specifications, and the conformance with Federal/State/Local applicable code requirements. MTGL has experience with showcase FHWA projects administered by Cities and Counties through Caltrans Local Assistance as well as FHWA funded projects administered by Transportation Funding Agencies such as San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), San Bernardino County Transportation Agency (SBCTA), and Riverside County Transportation Agency (RCTA). We have provided Geotechnical Engineering, Inspection and Material Services on some of the premier construction projects in Southern California. These include the $5.2 Million City of Anaheim Residential Street Improvements Group 6, $1.675 Million City of Brea Lagos De Moreno Park, $1.3 Million City of Brea Glenbrook Tract Waterline and Street Rehabilitation, $970 Million Interstate 405 (SR73 to I‐605) Design Build, and Inglewood Street Resurfacing, $200 Million Riverside Regional Water Quality Control Plant Expansion Project, and Southern California Edison Various Projects, to name a few. The following lists are some of our similar related projects for your references. Our references are also listed included in our project references. Client/Agency Contact Information Project Name Description of Services City of Fullerton On‐Call Professional Engineering Services 303 W. Commonwealth Avenue Fullerton, CA 92832 Contact/Phone David Grantham, P.E. P: 714.738.6853 Juan Zavala, P.E. Associate Engineer P: 714.738.6322 Joseph Hernandez Assistant Engineer P: 714.773.0049 Juanita Cooke Trail Improvements Nutwood/Yale Pavement Rehabilitation Skyline Drive Sewer Reconstruction Various Street Pavement Rehabilitation E Washington Avenue Sewer and Street Repair On‐Call Contract Duration: October 2018 through September 2021 MTGL Contract: $76.797 as of 02/17/20 Key Personnel Assigned: Pablo Naranjo, P.E., G.E. Frank Melo Steven Koch MTGL is providing professional on‐call services for miscellaneous geotechnical investigations, soil and material testing services for various capital projects. MTGL performed geotechnical investigations which consisted of a field exploration, laboratory testing of representative soils, a review of the compiled data and preparation of a written report containing recommendations in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. Pavement reconstruction, rehabilitation and/or surface analysis was performed in accordance with Caltrans guidelines (Pavement Design Manual) and geotechnical shoring recommendations. page |11739 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental Client/Agency Contact Information Project Name Description of Services City of Torrance Public Works Department Torrance, CA 90503 Contact/Phone Marc Simmons P: 424.399.3193 Cesar Aguilar P: 310.618.3061 Madison Street and Skypark Drive Reconstruction Duration: December 2014 through April 2015 Residential‐Arterial Pavement Improvement Duration: October 2019 ‐ Current MTGL Contract: $24,380 as of 02/17/20 Key Personnel Assigned: Pablo Naranjo, P.E., G.E. Frank Melo Steven Koch MTGL provided Acceptance Testing (AT) services included field subgrade compaction testing, field sub‐base compaction testing, final asphalt overlay compaction with nuclear gauge, asphalt concrete batch plant, asphalt concrete density testing and monitoring, and laboratory testing. City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Contact/Phone Kevin Wilson P: 323.583.8811 Felix Velasco P: 323.583.8811 x318 Downey Road Street and Traffic Improvements Project No. CS‐0940 Duration: June 2018 through July 2018 Reconstruction at Fire Station 76 and 78 Project No. CS‐093/CS‐0910 Duration: April 2018 through June 2018 MTGL Contract: $16,019 as of 02/17/20 Key Personnel Assigned: Pablo Naranjo, P.E., G.E. Frank Melo Steven Koch MTGL provided Acceptance Testing (AT) services included field subgrade compaction testing, field sub‐base compaction testing, final asphalt overlay compaction with nuclear gauge, asphalt concrete batch plant, asphalt concrete density testing and monitoring, and laboratory testing. City of Menifee CIP 29714 Haun Road Menifee, CA 92586 Contact/Phone Carlos E. Geronimo P: 951.723.3722 MTGL Contract: $55,646 as of 02/17/20 Key Personnel Assigned: Bruce Hick, P.E., G.E. Frank Melo Steven Koch Material Testing for CIP 18‐01 Slurry Testing Duration: 9/4/18‐4/30/19 CIP 18‐08 Adams Avenue Street Improvement Duration: 12/12/18‐ 6/30/19 PMP 19‐01 Miralago and Lake Pointe Resurfacing Duration: 2/1/19‐6/30/19 PMP 19‐03 Menifee Lakes Slurry Seal Phase 1 Duration: 8/7/19‐2/28/20 19‐02 Quail Valley Street Resurfacing Duration: 5/17/19‐ 12/31/19 MTGL is providing material testing and quality oversight services including slurry seal placement testing and laboratory testing including wet track abrasion testing, asphalt concrete binder content, aggregate sieve analysis, and emulsion content. page |12740 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental Client/Agency Contact Information Project Name Description of Services City of Riverside 2911 Adams Street Riverside, CA 92504 Contact/Phone Jorge Villanueva P: 951.826.2426 Harvey Lynn Substation Block Wall Duration: February 2018 MTGL Contract: $8,890 as of 02/17/20 Key Personnel Assigned: Bruce Hick, P.E., G.E. Charles Ferguson The project was to construct a new approximate 10‐feet high masonry block wall around the existing Harvey Lynn Station in Riverside, California. The wall is to be designed in accordance with Greenbook Standard Plan 601‐3. MTGL provided a geotechnical investigation and report which addresses the geotechnical conditions including a description of the site conditions, results of field exploration and lab oratory testing, and conclusions and recommendations. City of Brea Public Work Department 1 Civic Center Circle Brea, CA 92821 Contact/Phone Craig L. Harris P: 949.533.6011 Raymond Contreras P: 714.990.7763 Glenbrook Track Waterline and Street Rehabilitation Duration: May 2016 through September 2016 MTGL Contract: $23,946 as of 02/17/20 Key Personnel Assigned: Steven Koch Frank Melo MTGL provided the following services: Comprehensive Quality Assurance Materials Testing and Inspection services to aid in the construction of the project. Source Inspection of Roadway, Drainage, and Pipeline related materials included compaction testing of subbase and roadway materials in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Greenbook). Civil inspection of waterline installation, roadway inspection, materials quantity verification, assistance with “red line” drawing fabrication, and full‐service laboratory testing. City of Brea Public Work Department 1 Civic Center Circle Brea, CA 92821 Contact/Phone Raymond Contreras P: 714.990.7763 Lagos De Moreno Park Duration: August 2017‐ September 2018 MTGL Contract: $303,439 as of 02/17/20 Key Personnel Assigned: Bruce Hick, P.E., G.E. Pablo Naranjo, P.E, G.E. Saul Cruz Steven Koch This project is a joint‐use agreement between the City of Brea and the Brea Olinda Unified School District for the renovation of an existing school play yard located in the north end of the campus. The project includes CMU restroom building, DSA fabric shade shelters, playground equipment, 3 handball CMU walls, CMU retaining walls, three (3) A.D.A. ramps, site furnishings, PCC and asphalt paving, and a storm water detention and filtration system. MTGL provided soils, materials testing and inspection services including soils, concrete, masonry, structural steel (field and shop). page |13741 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental Client/Agency Contact Information Project Name Description of Services City of Anaheim Department of Public Works 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 Contact/Phone Ed Fernandez P: 714.864.0247 Residential Street Improvements Group 6 Duration: January 2016 through September 2016 MTGL Contract: $92,369 as of 02/17/20 Key Personnel Assigned: Steven Koch Frank Melo MTGL provided Quality Assurance Materials Testing, Source Inspection and Special Inspection included Specialty mix design review and suitability analysis, failure investigation services, mix design verification services, qualitative verification of mixture design portions, and supplemental roadway inspection in accordance with the Caltrans Local Assistance Manual Exhibit 16‐R and City of Anaheim QAP. CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE 910 Calle Negocio, Suite 100 San Clemente, CA 92673 Contact/Phone Christopher Tanio Associate Civil Engineer E: tanioc@san‐clemente.org CITY HALL RENOVATIONS FIREPROOFING Duration: February 2019 MTGL Contract: $1,350 as of 02/17/20 Key Personnel Assigned: Bruce Hick, P.E., G.E. Saul Cruz Steven Koch MTGL provided geotechnical engineering services include fireproofing inspections and findings results. City of Lynwood c/o Transtech Engineers 13367 Bensen Avenue Chino, CA 91710 Contact/Phone Ali Cayir P: 909.595.8599 City of Lynwood Residential Street Improvement Duration: September 2019 MTGL Contract: $5,700 as of 02/17/20 Key Personnel Assigned: Pablo Naranjo, P.E., G.E. Jay Rowerdink Steven Koch MTGL provided geotechnical engineering and coring services included testing, assessment and consulting. REFERENCES AGENCY/CONTACT INFORMATION DESCRIPTION City of Brea Public Work Department 1 Civic Center Circle Brea, CA 92821 Contact/Phone Raymond Contreras P: 714.990.7763 E: raymondc@ci.brea.ca.us Lagos De Moreno Park This project is a joint‐use agreement between the City of Brea and the Brea Olinda Unified School District for the renovation of an existing school play yard located in the north end of the campus. The project includes CMU restroom building, DSA fabric shade shelters, playground equipment, 3 handball CMU walls, CMU retaining walls, three (3) A.D.A. ramps, site furnishings, PCC and asphalt paving, and a storm water detention and filtration system. MTGL is providing soils, materials testing and inspection services including soils, concrete, masonry, structural steel (field and shop). page |14742 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental AGENCY/CONTACT INFORMATION DESCRIPTION City of Riverside 2911 Adams Street Riverside, CA 92504 Contact/Phone Jorge Villanueva P: 951.826.2426 E: jvillanueva@riversideca.gov Harvey Lynn Substation Block Wall The project was to construct a new approximate 10‐feet high masonry block wall around the existing Harvey Lynn Station in Riverside, California. The wall is to be designed in accordance with Greenbook Standard Plan 601‐3. MTGL provided a geotechnical investigation and report which addresses the geotechnical conditions including a description of the site conditions, results of field exploration and lab oratory testing, and conclusions and recommendations. City of Torrance Public Works Department Torrance, CA 90503 Contact/Phone Cesar Aguilar P: 310.618.3061 E: caguilar@torranceca.gov Residential‐Arterial Pavement Improvement MTGL provided Acceptance Testing (AT) services included field subgrade compaction testing, field sub‐base compaction testing, final asphalt overlay compaction with nuclear gauge, asphalt concrete batch plant, asphalt concrete density testing and monitoring, and laboratory testing. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS OF KEY PERSONNEL MTGL has assigned a qualified team of professionals and support staff to provide services to the City of Hermosa Beach with value‐driven quality services. With over 77 employees including engineers, field technicians and inspectors daily serving our projects, we are capable and able to accomplish geotechnical engineering, construction observation and materials/soils sampling and testing. Our engineers are registered in the State of California. Our inspectors and technicians are certified with ICC, AWS/CWI, ACI, DSA, Caltrans, and Nuclear Gauge Safety. They perform material testing and geotechnical services in accordance with Caltrans and Greenbook specifications, the City’s adopted Quality Assurance Program (QAP), and The Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (“Latest Edition”), and with local codes and regulations. MTGL’s key personnel and staff are full‐time employees and they will be available through the extent proposed for the duration of the project. They will not be removed or replaced without the prior written concurrence of the City of Hermosa Beach. Names Role Availability Steven Koch Corporate Organization 25% Bruce Hick, P.E., G.E. Technical Oversight | QAQC | Project Management 75% Pablo Naranjo, P.E., G.E. Technical Oversight | QAQC | Project Management 75% Frank Melo, EIT, PCI Level II Task Assignment | Furnish Deliverables | Documentation Transmittals 75% Jay Rowerdink, EIT Task Assignment | Furnish Deliverables | Documentation Transmittals 60% Benjamin Fury, ACI, Caltrans Field Tester/Technician 100% Taylor Witte, ACI, ICC, Caltrans Field Tester / Technician 100% page |15743 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental Bruce Hick, P.E., G.E., and Pablo Naranjo, P.E., G.E. | Geotechnical and Material Engineers They will be technically responsible for the entire contract, including administration, project management, review of deliverables, QAQC, and changes in scope. They will assign staff and will oversee and field testing and laboratory testing operations. They will provide technical review of all deliverables and make updates or changes to the scope of services. They will participate in pre‐construction meetings, field meetings, and construction progress meetings, acceptance of work, final walk‐through meetings, as built plan completion meetings, and other administrative meetings (if requested). Frank Melo |Task Leader and Assistant Project Manager He will be assisting and supporting MTGL’s Principal Engineer, Bruce Hick, with all any related technical issues of each project. He will be responsible for performing and overseeing the work tasks in Acceptance Testing (AT), Independent Assurance (IAP) testing services and ensure that all Quality Assurance Program (QAP) requirements are met. He will participate in pre‐construction meetings, field meetings, and construction progress meetings, acceptance of work, final walk‐through meetings, as built plan completion meetings, and other administrative meetings (if requested). He will furnish deliverables for review by the Principal Engineer. He will also provide and distribute information to all project stakeholders and other relevant persons. Jay Rowerdink |Staff Engineer He will be assisting and supporting MTGL’s Engineer, Bruce Hick, Pablo Naranjo and Frank Melo with all any related technical issues of each project. He will be responsible for performing and overseeing the work tasks in observing and take samples of asphalt concrete, aggregate base, soils, and ensure that all Quality Assurance Program (QAP) requirements are met. He will furnish deliverables for review by the MTGL engineer. He will also provide and distribute information to all project stakeholders and other relevant persons. Field Testers/Technicians MTGL’s field testers/technicians will sample, monitor placement, inspect, and record observations during construction and placement of structural materials. This includes all roadway materials and materials used for drainage and miscellaneous civil improvements. Materials will be sampled in accordance with nationally recognized test methods. Field testers/technicians will report to the task leader for routine project updates and service clarifications. Field testers/technicians will report to the Principal Engineer for test failures, discrepancies with construction activities, and specialty reporting or service requirements. Subconsultants MTGL has the capabilities and staff resources to fulfill all the requirements in‐house, with generally no need for subconsultants. However, MTGL will provide subcontractors if projects require services that are outside of our fee schedule‐defined labor categories. All subconsultants will be pre‐approved. page |16744 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental BRUCE HICK, P.E., G.E. Geotechnical and Material Engineer EXPERIENCE Bruce A. Hick has over 34 years of experience as a Geotechnical Engineer providing services across the entire spectrum of Geotechnical Engineering. He has managed geotechnical engineering and earthwork operations for a variety of projects that include educational facilities, recreational facilities, hospitals, mass grading developments, landfills, commercial facilities, stadiums, towers, structures, and wastewater facilities. His extensive experience and wide knowledge base included geotechnical investigations, specialty pile design, seismic hazard mitigation, resource evaluation and characterization, slope stability analysis, settlement analysis, seepage analysis, performance testing, post construction stability analysis, distress mapping and characterization. His geotechnical construction experience includes specification review and augmentation, earthwork related remediation, deep pile inspection, CIDH inspection, observation of ground improvement construction, and regulatory agency compliance. He is also an experienced quality assurance provider and construction engineering administrator. He has overseen geotechnical testing and inspection services for several projects with construction budgets of up to $100 ‐ $200 Million. His expertise in quality administration extends to projects administered through: DSA, FAA, FHWA, USBR, USACE, Greenbook, OSHPD, and various other city, governments, and local regulatory agencies. Years of Experience: 34 Years with MTGL: 4 Education: B.S. Civil Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH M.S. Civil Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH Licenses/Certifications: State of California Registered Civil Engineer, CE #45784 State of California Registered Geotechnical Engineer, GE #2284 RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE City of Riverside Harvey Lynn Substation Geotechnical Investigation He provided a geotechnical investigation and report which addresses the geotechnical conditions including a description of the site conditions, results of field exploration and laboratory testing, and conclusions and recommendation. LACMTA Division 1 Maintenance Annex Building, Los Angeles: As Material Engineer for this project involved the construction of a new maintenance and repair building on an existing Metro (Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority) facility. Our services included geotechnical engineering (including site grading, soils compaction testing), special inspection (masonry, concrete, reinforcing steel placement, concrete batch plant, structural steel and structural steel fabrication), along with materials testing. Metro Blue Line Track and System Refurbishment: As a Material Engineer, he reviewed field geotechnical grading observation and material testing for this project which consisted of the entire refurbishment of Blue Line track and signal system to enhance safety and provide upgrades to the oldest light rail line in the Los Angeles area. We provided rail welding quality control and testing services using ultrasonic, magnetic particle testing and quality control requirements to satisfy the inspections, testing and reporting for Specification 34 11 16 Rail Welding. page |17745 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental PABLO NARANJO, P.E., G.E. Geotechnical and Material Engineer EXPERIENCE Pablo Naranjo has over 22 years of extensive experience in the materials testing, inspection, and quality services industry. He has extensive experience with soil subsidence and foundation settlement. He has been involved providing foundation repair recommendations in over 50 residential, five (5) commercial (hospital, warehouse, school) and three (3) infrastructure (freeway, railroad, MSE wall) projects that had settlement and subsidence problems. His geotechnical engineering experience including bridges, levees, mines, earthquake/seismic design, slope stability analysis, temporary excavation support, rock stability, two (2) years of experience with rails, and materials engineering. His been focusing on field testing, site investigation, sampling, soil/rock classification, laboratory analysis, engineering analysis, conclusions, recommendations, geotechnical report preparation, document review, construction monitoring and post construction observations. His expertise in the materials testing and inspection extends to testing/characterization of materials following nationally recognized methods of analysis and testing procedures published by ASTM, AASHTO and Caltrans. He has also devised custom testing programs for validation/verification of materials in accordance with performance/testing criteria established by a variety public agency. Years of Experience: 22 Years with MTGL: 3 Education: B.S. Civil Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, MX M.S. Geotechnical Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID Licenses/Certifications: State of California Geotechnical Engineer, GE #2961 State of California Civil Engineer, CE #69499 RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE City of Fullerton On‐Call Professional Engineering Services As Geotechnical/Material Engineer, he performs geotechnical investigations which consisted of a field exploration, laboratory testing of representative soils, a review of the compiled data and preparation of a written report containing recommendations in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. LACMTA Willowbrook Rosa Park Station, Los Angeles: As a Material Engineer, he reviewed field geotechnical observation and material testing for this project improvement scope of work includes but is not limited to construction of a pedestrian crossing, Blue Line platform improvements, a new pedestrian entry pathway, and station mezzanine. Our services include soils, materials testing and inspection. LACMTA Southwestern Yard, Los Angeles: As a Material Engineer, he reviewed field geotechnical grading observation and material testing for this project involves the construction of a new maintenance and repair building on an existing Metro (Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority) facility. Our services included geotechnical engineering (including site grading, soils compaction testing), special inspection (masonry, concrete, reinforcing steel placement, concrete batch plant, structural steel and structural steel fabrication), along with construction materials testing (reinforcing steel, steel concrete and concrete aggregate). page |18746 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental FRANK MELO, E.I.T. SENIOR STAFF ENGINEER EXPERIENCE Frank Melo brings over 17 years of experience with a solid background in quality oversight services for the transportation sector. Extensive technical background in construction engineering, including construction quality assurance / quality control, materials testing, geotechnical engineering, construction materials engineering, structural inspection and engineering design and analysis. Frank’s experience also providing materials reviews, materials designs, quality plan development, and third party / referee testing. Frank has in‐depth laboratory and field testing of all roadway and structure materials including: Superpave HMA, Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement, Rapid Strength Concrete, Rebar Splices, Base Courses, and many other materials. Frank Melo has advanced proficiency with building codes, agency specifications, government publications, and industry directives that deal with nearly every type of vertical and horizontal construction project. He assists the MTGL’s Principal and Geotechnical Engineers for any related in geotechnical and materials testing services. He will be responsible and overseeing especially in materials testing and inspection services. He will also be responsible for preparing and submitting completed reports of all on‐site activities on daily basis. His work in materials and testing extends to materials evaluation of structural materials, design/characterization of materials, non‐destructive methods of examination, field “mock‐up” construction evaluation, destructive testing, materials suitability analysis, and more testing services. Years of Experience: 17 Years with MTGL: 17 Education: B.S. Civil Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego State of California, Civil Engineer in Training (EIT) 120422 Licenses/Certifications: ACI (Concrete Field‐Testing Grade I); Caltrans Certified (CT 105, 106, 125 AGG, 125 GEN, 125 HMA, 201); PCI 1812199 (Level II QC Technician/Inspector) RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE City‐Governments: City of Menifee CIP On‐Call Services City of Torrance Residential Arterial Pavement Improvements City of Fullerton On‐Call Professional Engineering Services City of Vernon Downey Road Street and Traffic Improvements Project CS‐0940 City of Anaheim Residential Street Improvements Group 6 – Largest City Government Pavement project in Southern California for 2016 City of Brea Glenbrook Track Waterline and Street Rehabilitation City of Fountain Valley – Ward Street Resurfacing City of Laguna Beach – Street Rehabilitation Projects FY 2012‐2013 City of Bell – Alamo Street Rehabilitation Highways: Interstate 215 Central Widening Scott Road and Nuevo Road State Route 74/Interstate 215 Interchange Improvement OCTA DB I‐405 Improvement I‐5 at Carmenita Boulevard, Santa Fe Springs, CA (07‐2519C4) SR 94 Pavement Rehabilitation in Jamul (11‐29404) – Largest Pavement Project in San Diego for 2014 page |19747 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental JAY ROWERDINK, E.I.T. Staff Engineer EXPERIENCE Jay Rowerdink has recently joined MTGL and has civil engineering experience including field materials testing and site exploration/investigation (findings), compiling and reporting data (groundwater details, lab testing, compaction reports, and grading), and construction observation/monitoring to assure compliance with recommendations. He assists MTGL’s Principal Geotechnical Engineers with anything related to geotechnical and materials testing services. He is responsible and professional especially in regarding to materials testing and inspection services. He will also be responsible for preparing and submitting completed reports of all on‐site activities on daily basis. He brings excellent documentation skills, along with an aptitude for identifying construction difficulties early on and resolving those issues expeditiously. His recent experience has allowed him to develop strong skills in working efficiently and proactively on any project. His communication skills, diligence, and dedication to his profession make him a great addition to any project team. Years of Experience: 2 Years with MTGL: 1 Education: Registration/License: B.S. Civil Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA Engineer‐in‐Training, #168434 Affiliations: ASCE, American Society of Civil Engineers RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE California State University, Los Angeles – Student Housing East City of Lynwood Residential Street Improvement Edwards Life Sciences – EDLS HVC Portal Newport‐Mesa Unified School District – Estancia High School Aquatic Center Newport‐Mesa Unified School District – New Stadium Newport‐Mesa Unified School District – Theater Menifee Valley Campus Stadium and Building Vista Unified School District Solar Pane Project page |20748 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental BENJAMIN FURY Field Technician EXPERIENCE Benjamin Fury is a Senior Field Technician assuring the highest quality of inspection from conception to completion. Benjamin has over 18 years as a Field Technician and has worked on DSA projects, Caltrans projects, and commercial projects. Benjamin understands the importance of project delivery and completion to ensure that the client is pleased with the work. Customer service is Benjamin’s top priority, and he shows how important that aspect is in the way he handles his work in the field. Specializing in Grading and Material Testing, Benjamin would be a major asset to any project. He is knowledgeable of all relevant standard compliance and code requirements. He brings excellent documentation skills, along with an aptitude for identifying construction difficulties early on and resolving those issues expeditiously. His experience has allowed him to develop strong skills in working proactively on any project. His communication skills, diligence and dedication to his profession make him a great addition to any project team. Performed duties as a Field Technician includes grading and materials testing services. Years of Experience: 18 Years with MTGL: 2 Licenses/Certifications: ICC #8890025 (Soils); ACI #00036804 (Concrete Field‐Testing Grade I); Caltrans (CT 125AGG, 125GEN, 125HMA, 231, 375, 504, 518, 539, 540, 543, 556, 557) RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE City of Vernon Downey Road Improvements City of Villa Park Sewer Rehabilitation City of Victorville – BM18‐067 Signal and Road Improvements Caltrans District 8 On‐Call CMS Mid Coast Corridor North OCTA DB I‐405 Improvement SBCTA Metrolink Active Transportation San Gabriel Valley Water Company – San Gabriel Plant 11 Water Plant West Basin Water District Pall MF Expansion Health South Rehabilitation Hospital, Murrieta Encompass Health OSHPD H1632289‐30‐00, Tustin 1272 OC Great Park Western Sector Roadway, Irvine Edward Lifesciences Projects, Irvine Garden and Gather Daimler Trailer Install Parking Structure Service Yard 17111 Red Hill Geotechnical Investigation Los Angeles Community College District – Los Angeles Mission College Central Energy Plant Orange Coast College Student Life PAR/Edison/Tehachapi Transmission Project Central Park West Community Association Crown Recycling Services Parking Lot Earth Work Observation at 6th and Hermosa Los Angeles Cemetery Columbarium Expansion Riverside National Cemetery Columbarium Expansion RCTC Regional Operations Center page |21749 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental TYLER WITTE Field Technician EXPERIENCE Tyler Witte has six (6) years of experience in the construction industry. He has an extensive experience as a Laboratory Technician with testing and inspection includes concrete, soil, concrete masonry units, reinforcing steel, fireproofing and aggregates. He is knowledgeable of all relevant standard compliance and code requirements. He brings excellent documentation skills, along with an aptitude for identifying construction difficulties early on and resolving those issues expeditiously. His experience has allowed him to develop strong skills in working proactively on any project. His communication skills, diligence and dedication to his profession make him a great addition to any project team. Years of Experience: 6 Years with MTGL: 6 Licenses/Certifications: ICC #9263266 (Soil); ACI #01307466 (Concrete Field‐Testing Grade I, Concrete Strength Testing); Caltrans Certified (CT 105, 125, 201, 202, 205, 216, 217, 226, 227, 229, 504, 518, 539, 540, 543, 556, 557); FACE F‐Number Measurement RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE OCTA DB I‐405 Improvement Caltrans 07‐306204 Roadway Rehabilitation CMS Mid Coast Corridor North‐ 86441‐016 CMS Mid Coast Corridor I‐5 Genesee‐004 CMS Mid Coast Corridor VoigtDr‐003 MTA Southwestern Yard MTA Maintenance Building 61S Metro Blue Line Track and System Refurbishment Metro Blue Line Signal System Rehabilitation Victorville Valley Transportation Authority (VVTA) Barstow Maintenance SANDAG San Elijo Double Track Covina Transit Center Park and Ride FedEx Ontario Expansion Materials California Air Resource Board (CARB), Riverside Carmel Valley Middle School Performing Arts Center Delta Terminal Renovations LAX American Airlines Terminal 4 and 5 El Sobrante Landfill 4th Scale Edward Life Science Parking Structure, Alton Road Edward Life Science Service Yard Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility Building Modifications, Whittier March Air Force Base Building 457 Pomona Pumping Plant No. 4 Rialto Fulfillment Lot 1 Royalty Demolition, Red Hill Avenue Site 7 Pavement Repair/Replace Unmanned Aircraft Hangar, Fort Irwin 156th Street Elementary School, 118776 Manhattan Place Elementary School, 03‐118858 Los Angeles Cemetery Columbarium Expansion Phase 1B California State University, Los Angeles – Student Housing East Rancho Santiago Community College District – Santa Ana College Johnson Student Center Rancho Santiago Community College District – Santa Ana College Science Center Orange Coast College Student Life page |22750 page |23751 page |24752 page |25753 ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? INSR ADDL SUBR LTR INSD WVD PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: FAXPHONE (A/C, No):(A/C, No, Ext): E-MAIL ADDRESS: INSURER A : INSURED INSURER B : INSURER C : INSURER D : INSURER E : INSURER F : POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXPTYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTEDCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRO-POLICY LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGGJECT OTHER:$ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $(Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) $ OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $ PER OTH- STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMITDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y / N N / A (Mandatory in NH) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER: CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.ACORD 25 (2016/03) CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) $ $ $ $ $ The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 8/23/2019 License # 0E67768 (619) 400-1990 50200 (619) 574-6288 25674 MTGL, Inc. 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Ste. A Anaheim, CA 92806 25682 20443 A 1,000,000 6802H020984 9/1/2019 9/1/2020 1,000,000 Cont Liab/Sev of Int 5,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Deductible 0 1,000,000B BA8319R531 9/1/2019 9/1/2020 Comp.: $1,000 Coll.: $1,000 9,000,000A CUP4161T475 9/1/2019 9/1/2020 9,000,000 0 A UB7K084400 7/1/2019 7/1/2020 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 C Prof Liab/Clms Made MCH591879084 9/1/2019 Per Claim 5,000,000 C Ded.: $50K Per Claim MCH591879084 9/1/2019 9/1/2020 Aggregate 5,000,000 PROOF OF INSURANCE FOR YOUR REFERENCE ONLY MTGLINC-01 AUSTINA IOA Insurance Services 4370 La Jolla Village Drive Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92122 Mandy Murphey Mandy.Murphey@ioausa.com Travelers Property Casualty Company of America Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut Continental Casualty Company X 9/1/2020 X X X X X X X X X X X X page |26754 page |27755 Geotechnical Engineering | Construction Inspection | Materials Testing | Environmental 756 RFP Proposal Response submitted to: City of Hermosa Beach, CA To Perform On-call Geotechnical Services February 17, 2020 Submitted By: Submitted To: 757 758 FIRM PROFILE 759 Smith-Emery Statement of Qualifications| 1 Firm Intro Smith-Emery has been providing inspection and materials testing services for public agencies and private companies for the past 114 years. With a staff of more than 400 licensed engineers, inspectors, technicians and administrative support, Smith-Emery has developed a reputation of delivering unmatched services that continually exceed client expectations. Firm Strength and Stability Founded in 1904, Smith Emery Company is the oldest and largest inspection and testing company on the West Coast, and remains the only commercial independent testing laboratory firm to be owned and managed by a Registered Civil Engineer. Smith-Emery operates under third generation company ownership. This creates stability and a long-term commitment to the company’s future. The firm is in a solid financial position. We are one of the few independent laboratories that have the financial capability to take on large, complex assignments as well as continue with our other commitments. This is an important consideration when selecting a testing and inspection firm – we will be there for you for the duration of the project. Commitment Our experience, resources, and financial stability give us the tools to commit to meeting the schedule. The schedule can’t stop. We know how to structure our part of the work for concurrent activities, as well making sure there are enough resources on site and in the laboratory to get the work done. Smith-Emery’s philosophy is to “keep the lights on” – 24 hours per day, seven days a week if the schedule demands it – we will always say yes to working to the schedule. Engineering Services Preliminary Soils / Geology Investigation Site Evaluation Hydrogeological Site Characterization Foundation Recommendations Geologic Mapping Remedial Grading Recommendations Liquefaction Studies / Seismic Design Settlement Analysis Deep Foundation Design Recommendations Shoring Design Parameters Pavement Design Forensic Investigation Foundation and Landslide Studies Earthquake Fault Zone Investigations SMITH-EMERY AT A GLANCE Founded April, 1904 in San Francisco, CA Family-owned/operated S-Corporation. 8 offices – providing support, technical expertise 350+ Inspectors 15 Project Managers 8 Project Engineers 2 Geotechnical Engineers 3 Registered Geologists 30 Laboratory Technicians Smith-Emery San Francisco, San Francisco, CA Smith-Emery San Francisco, Selma, CA Smith-Emery Company, Los Angeles, CA Smith-Emery Laboratories, Anaheim, CA Firm Information: Smith-Emery Laboratories Legal Entity: CA S Corp Corporation I.D. # C2132068 Address: 781 E. Washington Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90021 Contact: Michael Burke 781 East Washington Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90021 714/396.0448 (mobile) 213/749-3411 (office) mburke@smithemery.com NAISC Categories: 541380 541350 237310 236220 760 Smith-Emery Statement of Qualifications| 2 Field Inspection and Testing Mass Grading Inspection and Testing Backfill Inspection Footing Inspections Hot Mix Asphalt Placement Inspection Pile Driving and Caisson Inspection Drilled Foundation Inspections Shoring Inspections Inspection of Tie-Back Anchors Batch Plant Inspection 40-Hour OSHA HAZWOPER Personnel Laboratory Testing Capabilities Smith-Emery has a full service Caltrans, AASHTO, and DSA (LEA) accredited soils and asphalt laboratory, engineering technicians and professionals to provide comprehensive geotechnical consulting services. Soil Sieve Analysis, Fine or Coarse, ASTM C136 Material Finer than #200, ASTM C 177/D1140 Hydrometer Analysis, ASTM D 422 Specific Gravity Soils, ASTM D 854 Atterberg Limits, ASTM D4318 Moisture-Density Rel. of Soils, STM D1557 Consolidation Test, ASTM D 2335 Unconfined Compression Test, ASTM D 2166 Expansion Index, UBC-29-2, ASTM D 4829 Direct Shear Test, ASTM D 3080 Permeability, Constant Head, ASTM D 2434 Permeability, Falling Head, ASTM D 5084 Aggregate Absorption. Coarse/Fine, ASTM C 127/1280 Specific Gravity. Bulk SSD Coarse/Fine ASTM C 127/128 Cleanness Value, California 227 Sand Equivalent, ASTM 2419 Sodium or Mag. Soundness, ASTM C88 “R” Value, CT 301/ASTM 2844 Percent Flat/Elongate CT 119/ASTM 4791 Hot Mix Asphalt Stability Tests: Hveem, CT 304/366 Maximum Density: Hveem CT 304/308 Gradation of Extracted Sample CT 202 Maximum Theoretical Specific Gravity CT 309 Core Density, CT 308 Oil Content by Ignition Oven, CT 382 Concrete & Steel Inspections / Non-Destructive Testing Smith-Emery’s facility dispatches over 300 certified Special Building Inspectors daily to jobsites and steel fabrication shops throughout the greater Los Angeles area. Smith Emery’s structural inspections and materials sampling services include concrete, masonry, structural steel, and soils, and range to related structural materials such as shotcrete, fireproofing, Fiberwrap, and an extensive list of specialty materials. Our inspectors are certified and have extensive experience to inspect and test all types of construction – including new buildings, building additions, seismic upgrades, historic structures, and civil structures such as bridges and highways. Steel Shop Fabrication Inspection Smith-Emery has extensive experience providing structural steel inspections for product conformity, consistency, and reliability. Our inspection staff is capable of providing a wide range of services, and we have tailored our operating procedure and professional credentials to ensure that we can secure the highest levels of manufactured product quality. Smith-Emery’s specialists ensure that fabricated components are produced to meet precise specifications. Our staff members hold accreditation from national organizations such as American Welding Society, American Society of Non-Destructive Testing and NACE International. Currently, we have staff in over 45 shops – which includes shops in the United States, Canada, Mexico, China, Thailand, Turkey and Italy. Physical Testing Laboratory 761 Smith-Emery Statement of Qualifications| 3 Our Los Angeles facility is has the largest concrete cylinder cure room in California – capable of curing 10,000 cylinders at one time; 4x8, 6x12 and fork lift accessible. We have the capability of testing over 250,000 cylinders per year. The laboratory has seven machines capable of compressing 1,000 cylinders per day. Metallurgical Services Our Mechanical Testing & Failure Analysis services are directed by a state licensed metallurgical engineer. The “Met Lab” offers mechanical testing, consulting, and failure analysis services. Often projects necessitate a multi-disciplinary approach, and our close affiliation with the University of California’s research laboratories extends our expertise for diverse disciplines such as chemical, mechanical, and fracture mechanics allowing us to provide one-stop solutions to scientific challenges. Chemical Laboratory - Positive Lab Services Our Chemical Laboratory provides a full range of organic and inorganic testing services, including hazardous waste, soil, wastewater and groundwater analytical sample results. For projects requiring on- site real-time data, our mobile laboratory is equipped with GC, GC/MS and Horiba IR, and provides multiple analytical methods for fuel-relate d and/or chlorinated volatiles analyses. Geotechnical & Environmental The geotechnical department provides preliminary soils/geology investigation, site evaluation, soils inspection, soil foundation recommendations, bearing values and compaction testing, as well as geologic mapping, supervising mass site grading, pavement design, remedial grading recommendations, liquefaction studies and plant inspection. Our soils and asphalt laboratory is fully equipped and certified by government regulatory agencies. The Environmental Department performs Phase I & II Environmental Site Assessments-- to identify areas of environmental concern or potential environmental risks. Based on known historic usage of the property and/or its adjacent site, this information is intended to identify either potential concerns and/or the presence of contamination. When necessary, site characterization and oversight of the remediation clean-up process is performed. Waterproofing Testing & Inspection 762 Smith-Emery Statement of Qualifications| 4 The Smith-Emery’s curtain wall/façade mockup testing facility is the most sophisticated in the western United States. We are accredited by the American Aluminum Manufacturers Association (AAMA) to perform applicable test methods on mockups and in the field, in addition to a full range of specialty procedures. Since its inception in 1984, our curtain wall testing department has performed mockup testing for over 300 projects throughout the United States and the Pacific Rim. We have recently increased our testing capacity by adding space for four additional mockups, and the head of our testing facility has completed work on more than 4,000 mockups. We also perform field testing on windows installed at the project site. Smith-Emery is the only materials testing and special inspection firm in California that has an AAMA accredited facility – we have two – in San Francisco and Los Angeles. Our curtain wall testing laboratories feature computerized measurement equipment which provides accurate and immediate deflection readings for structural load testing, thereby saving substantial time as compared to taking manual readings. The following are typical tests performed on curtain/window wall systems. • Air Infiltration Tests ASTM E283 and ASTM E783 • Static Water Leakage Tests ASTM E331 and ASTM E1105 • Dynamic Water Test AAMA 501.1 • Structural Tests ASTM 330 • Window-Washer Tie-Back Tests • Seismic Tests AAMA 501.4 Resources: All Smith-Emery personnel proposed to work on the project shall be licensed and/or certified as required to perform their respective work. If proof of credentials is requested by Client’s Representative, such documentation shall be provided within a reasonable time frame. Client Relationships: We are in a ‘service / client relationship’ business. At Smith-Emery, we pride ourselves on establishing and maintaining positive working relationships and work environments. We have worked successfully and harmoniously with many members of your team and see no issues moving forward. Our mission is to work with pride, professionalism, and urgency to match the dedication of the other selected team members and personnel. 763 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH 764 Project Understanding & Approach Smith-Emery maintains a large base of professionals enabling the firm to respond to a City’s fluctuating needs and to complete the project on time. We have a large roster of personnel capable of performing anywhere in the world. Many of our personnel have been with the company for 20, 30, 40 and even 50 years. We encourage professional growth and, as a consequence, many of our inspectors are cross trained and multi-certified in a variety of disciplines. We have reviewed this RFP in its entirety and are assured of our ability to meet the needs of Hermosa Beach. Smith-Emery approaches our work methodically. All projects are set up to have milestone checks that will make sure the budget is on track and we are adhering to the schedule: Review Project Assignment with Client. • Speak with the client to assure full understanding of the work request (Task Order) and to identify potential omissions in the scope of work requested • Discuss schedule and agree to a delivery date Develop Work Plan • Identify activities, personnel, schedule and priorities • Identify and coordinate with other work on the same project, if any • Prepare and submit drilling application, if needed Review of Archive Data • Review relevant as-built plans, LOTB and reports and any other relevant records. • Obtain information regarding subsurface utilities Field Visit • Assure field personnel have proper equipment and safety gear • Assure permits are in order • Assure that the appropriate observations are made in accordance with the project needs • Mark the approved boring locations and mark underground utilities • Obtain samples, log soil conditions • Prepare preliminary report based on borings. Laboratory Testing • Perform lab tests on samples Analysis, Evaluations, Alternatives and Provide Recommendations • Perform engineering analyses • Develop design recommendations • Identify alternatives including associated advantages, disadvantages, and risks • Peer Review of Recommendations (Optional) • Discuss project and proposed recommendations alternatives with at least one experienced colleague 765 Review Reports • Check for compliance with applicable reporting standard • Check for consistency with other reports, if any, for the same project • Check resource estimates for design investigation and construction phase • Check for readability, clarity, grammar, and spelling. Preconstuction Services During this phase, Smith-Emery will provide a geotechnical review of the plans, specifications and estimates (Construction Documents) at 60% completion and provide comments. Our comments will be provided in a concise report. At the 90% permit level, Smith-Emery will also provide a review with our comments summarized in a concise report. During the preconstruction period and bidding phase, we will respond to requests for information (RFI) as related to the geotechnical portion of the work. Construction Services During construction, Smith-Emery will perform on site services to observe, sample and test soils, concrete, steel and other materials, as well as provide laboratory testing. As part of our services, we will prepare a report to summarize our observations and-testing results. We will review and respond to contractor requests for information (RFIs) in a timely manner. All RFIs will be logged and responded to in a complete manner to keep construction moving on schedule. The RFI log will be available to City staff. At the completion of construction, Smith-Emery staff will prepare a construction observation report that will contain our daily reports, observations, test results, and RFI log, and the tie-back report. 766 Organizational Chart JAMES PARTRIDGE, PE R.THEODORE PEET, PE PATRICK MORRISON, PG, CEG President and Civil Engineer Project Engineer Principal Geologist/Project Manager Mr. Partridge has over 40 years of technical experience including the last 20 years as owner and president of Smith-Emery Company. Mr. Partridge is responsible for the direction, overall technical competency and the quality control of five certified laboratories, 50+ professionals and over 300 inspectors in the fields of Materials Testing, Geotechnical, Environmental, Chemical, Metallurgical and Special Inspection. Mr. Peet is a multi-certified registered civil engineer, with over 40 years of experience in the construction industry. He is an ASNT NDT Level III, as well as ICC Structural Steel and Welding inspector (legacy). He has worked on projects all over the globe with a particular expertise in steel construction – buildings, bridges, airports, hospitals – yet has expertise in all aspects of all construction materials quality control. Mr. Morrison is responsible for the daily operations of the Northern California offices - both technically and operationally. He works closely with lab personnel and dispatch to ensure that resources are available when needed and budgets and schedules are being met, as planned. He is also the company’s principal geologist and responsible for Smith- Emery’s Geotechnical Operations. He has been with Smith-Emery for over 25 years. ROBERT GREELEY ROBERT RINEER, PE ARTEDI CORTEZ, PE, GE Proposed Project Manager Proposed Project Engineer Project Engineer Mr. Greeley has over 40 years of experience working with Smith- Emery.. He is the Operations Manager of our Southern California offices. Rob has managed on-call contracts with cities and municipalities throughout his tenure at Smith- Emery. Mr. Rineer is a registered civil engineer and materials specialist. He has over 15 years of experience in the industry with an emphasis on soils, asphalt and concrete construction materials. He has an extensive construction background and is familiar with City of Hermosa Beach processes and procedures. Mr. Cortez is responsible for the technical aspects of projects – reviewing the field and laboratory reports, as well as mix designs and issuing the final reports and documents for close-out. He has over 30 years in the industry, is a registered civil engineer as well as an ACI certified inspector. In addition, Mr. Cortez is a registered geotechnical engineer and provides engineer of record services to our geotechnical department. *All personnel are available to service the City of Hermosa Beach as needed to complete this contract. 767 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN 768 Project Management Plan Smith-Emery project management team will be in constant communication with City of Hermosa Beach Public Works personnel to ensure all expectations are met & all quality assurance services that are required are performed as efficiently as possible. Communications Approach • Smith-Emery Laboratories will establish an email thread with all project team members so that efficient communications can begin and all participating members of the contract are available and within reach at all times. • Services will be initiated and scheduled upon receipt of an inspection request from the City or City’s representative. • Smith-Emery requests 48 hour notice on all inspection requests to guarantee coverage. • Inspection requests can be made via telephone call or email to dispatch team. Phone calls are preferred so the dispatch team can address any questions, concerns, or specifics about the services to be performed. • Smith-Emery Project Managers will debrief monthly with City personnel to assure City of Hermosa Beach Public Works Dept. is satisfied with the services being provided, that invoices are understood & correct, and to confirm all quality assurance services that are required and requested are being performed and documented correctly. Quality Assurance / Quality Control Approach Smith-Emery’s Geotechnical Services Quality Management Plan is a strategy for learning and continuous improvement. Our Plan applies to project deliverables and project work processes at the project level, the local office level and company-wide. The goal of the plan is to achieve effective delivery, control and service with processes that are efficient and effective in meeting the goals of the project scope. Quality Control consists of the processes, practices and activities performed at the project team level. Quality Assurance is the internal verification that Quality Control has occurred at the office level. Independent Quality Assurance is external to the project delivery process and evaluates implementation of Quality Control and Quality Assurance. The Plan begins with the receipt of the work request and continues through the final recommendations and construction completion. Completion of the Plan provides assurance that the product delivered to the client conforms to the established procedures and standards, has undergone the appropriate reviews and quality checks, and meets the project expectations. Our plan provides a framework for the Geotechnical Services Department to develop clear,consistent practices for providing Quality Control, Quality Assurance, and Independent Quality Assurance of the various services and deliverables we produce. Geotechnical Project Quality includes the elements of Technical Quality, Cost Effectiveness, Meeting Schedule and Delivery, and Client Expectations. Note: Full Quality Assurance Manual available upon request. Smith-Emery is the ONLY testing laboratory / inspection agency to be audited and approved via AC 291 / ISO 17020 769 EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS 770 Experience & Qualifications Smith-Emery has performed Geotechnical Engineering services on substantial construction projects throughout the state of California. The following pages are relevant projects of which we performed the same scope of services required in this RFP . 771 Owner: City of Santa Cruz General Contractor: Bothman Construction Project Cost: $1,27 million Reference: City of Santa Cruz Christopher Schneiter, Asst. Public Works Director 809 Center Street, Room 201 Santa Cruz, CA 95062 831/420-5422 Depot Park Drainage Investigation Santa Cruz, California Geotechnical, When it had been open previously, the artificial turf at Depot wasn’t draining water properly, which left large puddles scattered across the field after rainy days. That old turf—installed a decade ago—was falling apart prematurely. The grass-like surface was turning into rugged terrain filled with lumps and divots, prompting the city of Santa Cruz to file a $1.3 million lawsuit and close the Park. Smith-Emery performed a drainage investigation on the 2.36 acre field site, including a test measuring the compression of the field found it was too firm to play on safely. Our scope included surveying and investigating site conditions and study of historical data to determine feasibility for repair or replacement. Ultimately, the City decided to replace the fields through the design-build methodology. La Vista Park Design-Level Geotechnical Investigation | 12 772 Owner: Oakland Zoo General Contractor: Overaa Project Cost: $70 million Reference: Howard Fuchs Construction Manager 1200 Mt. Diablo Blvd, Suite 319 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (510) 207-7694 California Trail Exhibit – Oakland Zoo Oakland, California Geotechnical, The 20 acre exhibit features 15 structures, including a Visitor Center and restaurant, are being built within the 61 acre site. A gondola carries zoo patrons from the Main Zoo up the ridge to the Visitor Center and restaurant, as well as a gondola that carries visitors to the Center A camping area with platform tents – is being constructed. Smith-Emery performed geotechnical investigations for the proposed park prior to construction. The site is on a hilly terrain, so we also performed slope stability analysis, as well as soil borings, cone penetration tests, rock coring. The design also included retaining walls. During construction, we performed geotechnical services for the structures, including the gondola, soils investigations and testing. La Vista Park Design-Level Geotechnical Investigation | 13 773 Owner: City of Santa Cruz General Contractor: Not Available Project Cost: $200,000 Saul Flores City of Palo Alto (Consultant) 650/862-3131 Adobe Creek Bridge – Mitchell Park Palo Alto, California Geotechnical, Due to the advanced age of the bridge, high traffic of children who use the bridge to travel to and from school, foot traffic generated by the Magical Bridge Playground and limited walkway width, the City needed to replace the Adobe Creek Bridge in Mitchell Park. As part of the Magical Bridge Playground, the pathways on either side of the existing bridge were upgraded for accessibility purposes and increased to a width of 10’. Replacing the bridge with a new structure allowed this same path width to extend across the bridge. Smith-Emery performed a geotechnical investigation that exploration of subsurface conditions at the site to determine the soil, rock, and groundwater profile and produce conclusions and recommendations for design and construction of the project based on the geotechnical design parameters developed in our study. We performed fieldwork with exploratory borings to extract samples for testing at the geotechnical laboratory for moisture content and density determinations, shear strength, unconfined compressive strength, plasticity indices, and other tests as appropriate. A final report was issued to the City. La Vista Park Design-Level Geotechnical Investigation | 14 774 Education: M.S. Geotechnical Engineering, World Open University, South Dakota B.S. Civil Engineering, University of The Philippines Professional Registration: Professional Civil Engineer #26009 Professional Geotechnical Engineer #239 Certifications: ASCE, ASTM, and ICC Credential to Teach Surveying, State of California Artedi Cortez, PE, GE Project Engineer/Geotechnical Engineer Mr. Cortez has over 40 years of geotechnical experience, of which over 30 has been related to geotechnical engineering. Throughout his career, his various duties include project management and senior geotechnical engineering duties of all geotechnical projects. Senior geotechnical engineer and project management responsibilities include supervision and engineering of all geotechnical engineering assessments and related projects performed at Smith-Emery Laboratories. Burbank Airport Intermodal Transportation Center Disneyland – on-call various proejcts Knotts Berry Farm UCLA – various projects USC – expansion projects 775 Education: B.S., Civil Engineering, CSU, Los Angeles, CA Professional Registration: Registered Civil Engineer #C68166 City of Los Angeles Registered Grading Deputy Inspector #P008158 Certifications: HAZWOPER - 40 Hour Trained Simon Bittar, PE Project Engineer Mr. Bittar has performed hundreds of geotechnical investigations over the past 20 years. Mr. Bittar handles the project management duties of many of the geotechnical investigation as well as overseeing and providing technical guidance to soil technicians; recommendations, preparation of geotechnical engineering reports and compaction reports; as well as provides geotechnical construction observations and inspections during the grading operations and construction phase of various projects. Selected Project Experience Fox Studios, Century City Area of the City of Los Angeles, CA. Prepared Geotechnical investigation report for the proposed construction of a three-story building over five-story subterranean parking structure. Fox Studios, Century City Area of the City of Los Angeles, CA. Performed a geotechnical investigation for Building 310 (Grib Building) with full subterranean parking. Fox Studios, Century City Area of the City of Los Angeles, CA. Prepared Geotechnical observation during the construction of the office building on lot “B”. The building consisted of two- to three-story structure over three levels of subterranean parking. Opus West, Broadstone Project, in the Down Town Area of the City of Los Angeles, Provided geotechnical observation during the construction of the four- to-five story apartment building over one- to two-levels of subterranean parking Opus West Project, Proposed Camarillo Business Park (14 Structures), City of Camarillo, Ventura County, CA. Prepared geotechnical investigation report for the proposed construction of fourteen (14) commercial structures on grade. . Global Premier, Bay Apartment Project, Moreno Valley, CA. Provided geotechnical observation and project management during the construction of the four apartment buildings on grade. Princeton Loft (Two-story), Marina Del Rey, CA. Prepared Geotechnical Investigation report prior to converting a 23,000 sq. ft. warehouse building into a residential lofts structure. 776 Academic Background: B.A. Geology, Humboldt State University, 1987 Professional Registration: CA Professional Geologist No. 7174 CA Certified Engineering Geologist No. 2643 Certifications: Nuclear Density Gauge and Radiation Safety Officer Trained OSHA 40 hour Hazardous Waste Operations / Emergency Response Training Patrick Morrison, PG, CEG Project Manager/Geologist Mr. Morrison has over 30 years of professional experience in special inspection, material testing, rail construction, geotechnical engineering and environmental fields and 28 years working at Smith-Emery. Mr. Morrison is responsible for management of Smith-Emery San Francisco’s GeoServices Division consisting of a staff of 20 inspectors and geotechnical/environmental professionals. Project responsibilities encompass project management for testing and inspection on major infrastructure projects, environmental site characterizations, fault hazard studies, slope stability analysis, geologic mapping, grading and paving inspection and footing/pier inspections. Active in project oversight for earthwork and paving inspection and testing, as well as special inspections on projects throughout the Bay Area, review of field and laboratory data for conformance to project specifications, and presentation and communication of data to clients and regulatory agencies. Selected Project Experience Kasier Redwood City Hospital Replacement, Redwood City California High Speed Rail, Construction Packages 2 & 3, Selma, CA Presidio Parkway, San Francisco, CA Facebook (various projects), Menlo Park Campus SFOBB Self-Anchored Suspension (SAS) Bridge, Oakland Clearview Campus, San Mateo Stanford University, Redwood City Campus Juniper Networks, Sunnyvale Hitachi Storage Center, San Mateo Genesis Campus, South San Francisco Dolby Laboratories, San Francisco Commonwealth Corporate Campus, Menlo Park City of Redwood City Geotech and Soils Engineering on-call, Redwood City SFPUC Crystal Springs Bypass Tunnel, San Mateo County Devil’s Slide Tunnel, Pacifica/Moss Beach Highway 238/880 Improvements, Hayward BART North Oakland Aerial Structure Seismic Retrofit, Oakland BART SFO Extension, San Mateo County Port of Oakland 50-foot Deep Water Turning Basin 777 Education University of Pittsburgh B.S. Civil Engineering Certifications Registered Professional Engineer, Civil (CA) #: C62632 ASNT NDT Level III Certification #: 15090 Magnetic Particle Testing - Liquid Penetrant Testing - Radiographic Testing - Ultrasonic Testing International Code Council (ICC) Structural Steel and Welding Inspector (legacy) - Structural Steel and Bolting Inspector - Structural Welding Inspector R. Theodore Peet, PE Contract Manager Mr. Peet is a multi-certified Registered Civil Engineer, with over 40 years of experience in the construction industry. In addition to being a registered civil engineer, Mr. Peet is also a ASNT Level III and a legacy ICC certified steel and welding inspector. He is a valued member of our Engineer team and has worked with Smith-Emery since 1997. He excels as a designated Project Engineer and is as asset to any project team that he is assigned to. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Los Angeles Natural History Museum Hollywood Park Casino and Parking Structure Inglewood Football Stadium and Entertainment District LAFC Practice Facility, Los Angeles LAFC Stadium Project, Los Angeles Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum The Broad Museum, Los Angeles Santa Monica Civic Center Parking Structure, Santa Monica USC The Village, Los Angeles USC Broad Center, Los Angeles Regional Intermodal Transportation Center, Burbank Airport • Fullerton Transportation Center & Parking Structure Staples Center, Los Angeles LA Live!, Los Angeles The Hotel and Residence at L.A. Live, Los Angeles • Los Angeles Federal Courthouse, Los Angeles • Loma Linda Hospital Remodel and Expansion, Loma Linda 778 Education: Bachelor of Science (B.S.) in Civil Engineering – California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Professional Registration: Registered Civil Engineer # C84142 Certifications: Nuclear Gauge Certified Certified Erosion, Sediment and Storm Water Inspector – Certificate # 2725 Qualified Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Practitioner – Certificate # 22732 Robert Rineer, PE, QSP Project Engineer Mr. Rineer is a Registered Civil Engineer, with 16 years of experience in the construction industry and 10 years of experience in our engineering department. His duties include, but are not limited to: oversight, reporting and recommendations as they pertain to geotechnical investigations, project closeout reports, review of laboratory testing reports and overseeing general laboratory operations for our Orange County division. Robert is a valued member of our Engineer team and has worked with Smith-Emery since 2007. Selected Project Experience 8th Street Water Line – Irvine, California Patterson Way Pavement Investigation – Fullerton, California California State Polytechnic University, Pomona / Student Services Building – Pomona, California Loma Linda University Medical Center – Loma Linda, California Orange County Great Park, Sports Park – Irvine, California Rolling Hills Investigation – Fullerton, California State College Boulevard Pavement and Subgrade Investigation – Fullerton, California Olive Storm Drain Project, Pavement and Subgrade Investigation – Fullerton, California Balfour Avenue Storm Drain, Limited Pavement and Subgrade Investigation – Fullerton, California 618 N. Beverly Drive – Beverly Hills, California Carnegie Medical Plaza Moisture Investigation – Corona, California Google Building #21, Limited Structural Investigation – Playa Vista, California Blandwood Sewer Lift Station Replacement Project, Limited Geotechnical Investigation – Fullerton, California OCPC Broadcom, Irvine Campus – Irvine, California Disney Glendale Pavement Investigation – Glendale, California The Current Apartments – Long Beach, California The Source OC – Buena Park, California City of Garden Grove, Brookhurst Street Rehabilitation – Garden Grove, California City of Fullerton, Elm and Malden Area Sewer and Street Improvement – Fullerton, California Orange County Great Park, Palm Court – Irvine, California City of Fullerton, Muckenthaler Mansion – Fullerton, California Port of Long Beach, Oxy Wells Removal – Long Beach, California Port of Long Beach, Piers “E,” “F,” “G,” and “T” – Long Beach, California 779 Certifications: American Concrete Institute Field Testing Technician – Grade I Certification, 00119750, International Code Council – Certification No.: 8408785, Soils Special Inspector Caltrans Certified: Soils, Asphalt, Concrete (2016) City of Irvine Concrete Certification Asphalt Certification National Highway Institute – Certificate in HMA Paving Field Inspection FHWA-NHI-131129 CED Engineering Soil Mechanics: Certificate Classification of Soils-CN: G04-002 Nuclear Gauge Certification ID# 1979 Certified Radiation Safety Officer ID# 1166 Robert Greeley Field Supervisor Mr. Greeley is a valued member of our management team and has worked with Smith-Emery since 1978. Robert has extensive experience in managing public works and private sector projects and is familiar their various requirements. He assumes the role of project manager for the majority of Smith-Emery Laboratories projects. He is very knowledgeable, proficient technicians, as well as an accomplished field supervisor. Selected Project Experience Inglewood Stadium (Rams), Los Angeles Disney Company – Disneyland Park On-Call Los Angeles Football Club Stadium Staples Center, Los Angeles Anaheim Angels Stadium Honda Center (Anaheim Ducks) California State Polytechnic University, Pomona / Student Services Building Loma Linda University Medical Center Orange County Great Park, Sports Park OCPC Broadcom, Irvine Campus OCPC Broadcom, Campus Bridges Hyundai Motor Company, Corporate Headquarters Burbank Airport Expansion Westminster Unified School District City of Downey, Various CIP Project City of Garden Grove, Various CIP Projects City of Fullerton, Various CIP Projects City of Orange, Various CIP Projects Port of Long Beach, Oxy Wells Removal-Gerald Desmond Bridge Port of Long Beach, Piers “E,” “F,” “G,” and “T” Griffin Structures, Fullerton Community Center Long Beach Airport, Air Carrier Ramp, Taxiway G Transportation Center Parking Expansion International Polytechnic High School Orange County Sanitation District Plant Expansion California State University, Fullerton / Student Housing Orange County Water District, Various Projects 780 REQUIRED FORMS 781