Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2026-03-24 | Regular Meeting
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Agenda Tuesday, March 24, 2026 Closed Session at 5:00 PM and Open Session at 6:00 PM Council Chambers 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 CITY COUNCIL Mike Detoy, Mayor Michael D. Keegan, Mayor Pro Tem Ray Jackson, Councilmember Dean Francois, Councilmember Rob Saemann, Councilmember David Pedersen, City Treasurer APPOINTED OFFICIALS Steve Napolitano, City Manager Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney EXECUTIVE TEAM Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Ann Yang, Interim City Clerk Alison Becker, Community Development Director Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director Landon Phillips, Police Chief Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 - To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices (ALD) are available for check out at the meeting. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, you must call or submit your request in writing to the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0204 or at cityclerk@hermosabeach.gov at least 48 hours before the meeting. PARTICIPATION AND VIEWING OPTIONS Hermosa Beach City Council meetings are open to the public and are being held in person in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. Public comment is only guaranteed to be taken in person at City Hall during the meeting or prior to the meeting by submitting an eComment for an item on the agenda. As a courtesy only, the public may view and participate via the following: Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89968207828? pwd=bXZmWS83dmxHWDZLbWRTK2RVaUxaUT092 • Phone: Toll Free: (833) 548 0276; Meeting ID: 899 6820 7828, then #; Passcode: 472825• eComment: On the HTML agenda, click an agenda item, then click on the blue “Leave comment” (on computer) / blue speech bubble (on phone/tablet) button to provide a comment for that item. Submit eComments no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time. • Supplemental Email: Submit a supplemental email for agenda items only to cityclerk@hermosabeach.gov. Supplemental emails should indicate the agenda item and meeting date in the subject line and must be received no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time. Emails received after the deadline but before the meeting ends will be posted to the agenda the next business day. Writings distributed to all, or majority of all, of the City Council after the agenda has been posted shall be available for inspection at the City Clerk's Office located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 during regular business hours. • Please be advised that while the City will endeavor to ensure these remote participation methods are available, the City does not guarantee that they will be technically feasible or work all the time. Further, the City reserves the right to terminate these remote participation methods (subject to Brown Act restrictions) at any time and for whatever reason. Please attend in person or by submitting an eComment to ensure your public participation. Similarly, as a courtesy, the City will also plan to broadcast the meeting via the following listed mediums. However, these are done as a courtesy only and not guaranteed to be technically feasible. Thus, in order to guarantee live time viewing and/or public participation, members of the public shall attend in Council Chambers. Cable TV: Spectrum Channel 8 and Frontier Channel 31 in Hermosa Beach • YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofHermosaBeach90254 • Live Stream: www.hermosabeach.gov/agenda• Cablecast App: Available on supported devices and smart TVs• If you experience technical difficulties while viewing a meeting on any of our digital platforms, please try another viewing option. Page 2 of 1126 Pages 1.CLOSED SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 5:00 PM 2.ROLL CALL 3.PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA This Public Comment period is limited to Closed Session agenda items only. Public Comment is limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. 4.RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION 4.a MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on March 10, 2026 4.b CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR California Government Code section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Tyler Cashman, Interim Human Resources Manager Organizations: Teamsters, Professional and Medical Employees’ Union, Local 986 4.c CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1) Name of Case: Koerner v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: 25STCP00891 5.OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM 6.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 7.ROLL CALL 8.CLOSED SESSION REPORT 9.ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS 10.APPROVAL OF AGENDA This is the time for the City Council to discuss any changes to the order of agenda items. Recommended Action: To approve the order of the agenda. 11.PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS 11.a RECOGNIZING RESIDENT AND UFC WELTERWEIGHT CONTENDER, JEAN-PAUL LEBOSNOYANI Page 3 of 1126 12.PUBLIC COMMENT 14 This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction and on items where public comment will not be taken (City Manager Reports, City Councilmember Comments, Consent Calendar items not pulled for separate discussion, and Future Agenda Items). If public comment is provided on a Public Hearing or Municipal Matter item, public comment on the same item will not be accepted when the item is heard at a later part of the meeting. The public is invited to attend and provide public comment. Public comments are limited to three minutes per speaker from those present in City Council Chambers and via the remote participation options listed on the agenda. This time allotment may be modified due to time constraints at the discretion of the Mayor or City Council. No action will be taken on matters raised during public comment, except that the Council may take action to schedule issues raised during public comment for a future agenda. Speakers with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are encouraged to submit those comments directly to the City Manager. Members of the public will have a future opportunity to speak on items pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion, Public Hearings, and Municipal Matters when those items are heard. 13.CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 14.UPDATES ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITIES This is the time for members of the City Council to report on their attendance at ad hoc subcommittees or standing committee meetings, conferences, or other official activities as City representatives. 15.CONSENT CALENDAR The following matters will be acted upon collectively with a single motion and vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. Councilmembers may orally register a negative vote on any Consent Calendar item without pulling the item for separate consideration before the vote on the Consent Calendar. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember removes an item from the Consent Calendar, either under Approval of the Agenda or under this item before the vote on the Consent Calendar. Items removed for separate discussion will be provided a separate public comment period. Recommended Action: To approve the consent calendar. 15.a WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived. Page 4 of 1126 15.b CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 37 (Interim City Clerk Ann Yang) Recommended Action: To approve the minutes of the March 10, 2026 regular meeting. 15.c CHECK REGISTERS - 26-AS-021 52 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for March 4, 2026 (Attachment 1) through March 11, 2026 (Attachment 2). The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands. 15.d CITY TREASURER’S REPORT - 26-AS-022 76 (City Treasurer Dave Pedersen) Recommended Action: The City Treasurer recommends City Council receive and file the February 2026 City Treasurer’s Report. 15.e CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF MARCH 12, 2026 - 26-PW-015 78 (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of March 12, 2026. 15.f APPROVE SPECIAL EVENT LONG-TERM AGREEMENT WITH HOPE CHAPEL FROM 2026 THROUGH 2028 TO PROVIDE ANNUAL HOPE CHAPEL PICNIC EVENTS - 26-PR-002 87 (Special Events and Filming Coordinator Austin DeWeese) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: Approve a special event long-term agreement (LTA) with Hope Chapel from 2026 through 2028 to provide annual Hope Chapel picnic events (Attachment); and 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest the LTA, subject to approval by the City Attorney. 2. 15.g APPROVE REMOVAL OF THREE OF SIX BASKETBALL HOOPS ON WEST SIDE OF CLARK FIELD - 26-PR-009 98 (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council approve the removal of three of six basketball hoops along the western side of Clark Field, and the associated safety improvement measures. Page 5 of 1126 15.h RATIFY LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR REFORMING MENTAL HEALTHCARE WITHIN THE COUNTY’S HOMELESSNESS SERVICES SYSTEM MOTION - 26-CMO-016 103 (Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council ratify a letter of support sent on March 16, 2026 supporting Los Angeles County Supervisors Lindsey P. Horvath and Kathryn Barger’s motion, Reforming Mental Healthcare Within the County’s Homelessness Services System, at the March 17, 2026 Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Meeting. 15.i ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 3.32 TITLED TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX - 26- CMO-015 108 (Senior Management Analyst Ken Bales) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: Waive full second reading and adopt by title only “An Ordinance amending Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 3.32.020 Definitions, 3.32.030 Tax Imposed, and 3.32.100 Appeal (Attachment); and 1. Direct the City Clerk to print and publish a summary ordinance in a newspaper of general circulation within 15 days following adoption and post a copy on the City’s bulletin for 30 days. 2. 15.j ADOPT AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 17.21 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS - 26-CDD-036 112 CEQA: Determine the action to be Statutorily Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code § 21080.17. (Community Development Director Alison Becker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: Determine the Ordinance to be Statutorily Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code § 21080.17; 1. Adopt by title only and waive second reading of an Ordinance (Attachment 1) repealing and replacing Chapter 17.21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code pertaining to Accessory (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADU); and 2. Direct the City Clerk to print and publish the summary ordinance in a newspaper of general circulation within 15 days following adoption and post it on the City’s bulletin for 30-days. 3. Page 6 of 1126 15.k APPROVE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH IK CONSULTING, LLC TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WITH THE ACCELA CIVIC PLATFORM SOFTWARE - 26-CDD-037 140 (Community Development Director Alison Becker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: Approve the proposed fourth amendment to an agreement with IK Consulting, LLC to provide ongoing technical assistance with the Accela Civic platform to increase the not-to-exceed amount by $23,000, resulting in a total not-to-exceed amount of $82,725 (Attachment 1); 1. Appropriate $23,000 from Records Technology Fees reserved in the Equipment Replacement Fund for the fourth amendment; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest the attached fourth amendment (or similar in substance), subject to modification and approval by the City Attorney 3. 15.l CITY COUNCIL DOWNTOWN LIGHTING AND BEAUTIFICATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT ON EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025–2026 BEAUTIFICATION FUNDING - 26-PW-013 165 CEQA: Determine the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines. (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente and Community Development Director Alison Becker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: Determine the proposed improvements are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301; 1. Adopt the Expenditure Plan prepared by the City Council Downtown Lighting and Beautification Subcommittee; and 2. Authorize staff to undertake projects identified in the Expenditure Plan. 3. 16.PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M 17.MUNICIPAL MATTERS Page 7 of 1126 17.a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) 623 REGARDING MUNICIPAL PIER STRUCTURAL INSPECTION AND EVALUATION, REPAIR, AND REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT 171 CEQA: Determine that the high priority structural repairs and removal and replacement of the Surfer’s Walk of Fame Plaques Project (“Project”) as part of CIP 623 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301. (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: Determine that the high priority structural repairs and, removal, and replacement of the Surfer’s Walk of Fame Plaques Project (“Project”) as part of CIP 623 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities); 1. Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption within 5 business days;2. Direct staff to complete the high priority repairs to the Municipal Pier (“Pier”) as part of CIP Project 623; 3. Direct staff to replace the Surfer’s Walk of Fame plaques with the railing-mounted option as part of CIP 623; and 4. Provide staff with direction on whether to begin the planning and environmental review process for a proposed replacement project. 5. 17.b MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2025-26 - 26-AS-023 583 (Finance Manager Henry Chao) Page 8 of 1126 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: Approve the revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations, budget transfers and fund balances as shown herein and in the attached Projected Change in Financial Position (Attachment 1) and the Midyear Budget Amendment (Attachment 2); 1. Approve the following transactions from the General Fund:2. Appropriate $548,007 of assigned fund balance from the Midyear Budget Review 2025-26 to cover the $548,007 unassigned fund balance shortfall; a. Transfer $317,833 of unspent funds from 2024-25 actuals to the Insurance Fund to bring the up to the funding goal of $3.0 million; b. Assign the estimated remaining $2,239,276 of unspent funds from 2024-25 actuals to the assigned fund balance category; c. Receive and file the City Council Travel Summary (Attachment 3); and 3. Provide direction to staff on whether to continue or discontinue the City’s participation in the Beach Cities Transit (BCT) Line 109 agreement currently funded by Fund 145 Proposition A funds, given increasing subsidy requests, ongoing structural cost pressures, and insufficient ridership data to evaluate Hermosa Beach-specific benefits. 4. Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 17.c KELLY COURTS – PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS - 26- PR-015 621 (Senior Recreation Supervisor Brian Sousa) Page 9 of 1126 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: Approve modifications to the Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy, including revisions to the permissible play equipment and designating courts 1 and 2 for reservation and open walk-on play, with Courts 3 and 4 open for walk-on play only; and 1. Approve one of the following options to modify the courts’ hours of operation: 2. Option 1 (Attachment 2):• Monday: Closed• Tuesday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.• Wednesday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.• Thursday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.• Friday–Sunday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.• Option 2 (Attachment 3):• 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily; or• Option 3 (Attachment 1):• The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission’s (Commission) recommendation to maintain the facility hours as currently designated: • Sunday and Monday: Closed• Tuesday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.• Wednesday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.• Thursday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.• Friday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.• Saturday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.; and• request for staff to report back to the Commission within 120 days following the reopening of the courts with a report on complaints, community feedback, and court usage. • 17.d APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ON-CALL SANITARY SEWER AND VIDEO INSPECTION SERVICES WITH EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING AND EQUIPMENT, INC. - 26-PW-011 709 (CEQA): The action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5). (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Page 10 of 1126 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: Determine the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5); 1. Approve the proposed amendment to the agreement with Empire Pipe Cleaning and Equipment, Inc. to provide sanitary sewer hydro-flushing and video inspection maintenance services, extending the contract term through June 30, 2027, increasing the total base contract amount by $255,696, and increasing contract total from $793,490 to $1,049,186 (Attachment 1); 2. Authorize the Director of Public Works to increase the annual project contingency from $10,000 per year to $15,000 per year for Fiscal Year (FY) 26-27; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendment, approve minor non-substantive modifications if necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk attesting to the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney. 4. 17.e APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ON-CALL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES WITH MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC. - 26-PW-012 864 CEQA: Determine that this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) (administrative activities) (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Page 11 of 1126 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: Determine that the First Amendment to the Maintenance Services with Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(5) (administrative activities); 1. Approve the proposed First Amendment to the agreement with Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. for On-call Landscape Maintenance Services, extending the contract term through June 30, 2027, increasing the total base contract amount by $623,663, and the total contract amount from $2,173,789 to $2,797,452 (Attachment 1); 2. Authorize the Director of Public Works to increase the annual project contingency from $65,000 to $100,000 per year for Fiscal Year (FY) 26-27; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendment, approve minor non-substantive modifications if necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk attesting to the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney. 4. 17.f INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON THE COST EVAULATION AND STAFFING MODELS TO INCREASE PUBLIC SAFETY PRESENCE ON THE STRAND, BEACH, AND PARKS - 26-PD-007 1085 Informational items are for discussion only. No action will be taken. A Council majority may request an action item to return at a future meeting. (Police Chief Landon Phillips) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive an informational report on the cost evaluation and staffing models to increase public safety presence on the Strand, the beach, and City parks, and provide direction, if so desired. 18.FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS This is the time for Councilmembers to schedule future agenda items and to ask questions about the status of previously approved future agenda items. No discussion, debate, or public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The tentative future agenda items document is provided for information only. 18.a TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 26-CMO-017 1107 Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information. 19.CITY MANAGER REPORT 1115 Page 12 of 1126 20.INFORMATIONAL ITEMS This is reserved for items that do not require City Council action. The City Council may request a future agenda item to discuss an informational item. Otherwise, discussion of informational items will not be taken. 20.a ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 21, 2026 1117 (Associate Engineer Andrew Nguyen) 20.b ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 17, 2026 1123 (Community Development Director Alison Becker) 21.ADJOURNMENT Page 13 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON THE COST EVAULATION AND STAFFING MODELS TO INCREASE PUBLIC SAFETY PRESENCE ON THE STRAND, BEACH, AND PARKS - 26-PD- 007 tonyhiggins I fully support offloading the Hbpd but i hope will have time to for more speeding enforcement busy residential collector roads like Ardmore, Prospect, Valley dr, 27th and Gould adjacent to Valley Park where not a single speeding ticket has bern issued in over two years according to a recent public records request. For details tap/click on the above pdf. thank you for considering, tonyhiggins For Page 14 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL PUBLIC COMMENT tonyhiggins Dear Council, Something you may not have known: California's use of the 85th percentile rule has historically led to a phenomenon known as "speed creep," where speed limits gradually increase over time. Under the traditional application of this rule, local governments were often forced to raise speed limits to match the speed at which 85% of drivers were already traveling to maintain legal enforcement. This created a cycle: as the posted limit rose, drivers often drove even faster, leading to a higher 85th percentile in the next mandatory 7- to 14-year survey, which then required another limit. You can do something about that [preemptively] by reducing the speed limit from 25 to 20mph on busy RESIDENTIAL collector roads like prospect, 27th and Gould adjacent to Valley Park where legitimate safety concerns meet the tests required by AB 43. Thank you for your consideration, tonyhiggins No Position Page 15 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL CITY COUNCIL DOWNTOWN LIGHTING AND BEAUTIFICATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT ON EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 20252026 BEAUTIFICATION FUNDING - 26-PW- 013 Laura Pena Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Staff - I am writing to respectfully request a continuance of this item regarding the Downtown Lighting and Beautification Subcommittees recommendation for the $100,000 beautification funding allocation. Beautification is important, and I appreciate the effort that has gone into developing a proposal. However, before the City takes final action, I believe there should be an opportunity for broader feedback from residents, downtown businesses, and property owners. These funds were intended to support the downtown commercial district, and additional outreach would help ensure the expenditure plan reflects community priorities and the Citys broader economic development goals. I also believe the City should consider whether some or all of these funds could support a partnership in which businesses work with the Chamber of Commerce to explore collaborating with the City on a string lighting palm trees and/or hanging flower basket project. Improvements like these could help create a stronger sense of place, beautify the downtown, and support a more welcoming and vibrant business district. A continuance would not stop the work. It would simply provide time for a more transparent and inclusive review of the recommendations and allow stakeholders to weigh in on whether the current proposal is the best use of these funds. For these reasons, I respectfully ask the City Council to continue this item to a future meeting and invite additional public and business feedback before approving the expenditure plan. As always, I appreciate your consideration. Laura Pena No Position Page 16 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) 623 REGARDING MUNICIPAL PIER STRUCTURAL INSPECTION AND EVALUATION, REPAIR, AND REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT Tom Horton On behalf of The South Bay Boardrider's Club, a 501c3 non-profit founded in 2009 by 4 Hermosa Beach locals, please postpone the relocation of the plaques until a more suitable location is identified, and we request that staff include Surfer Walk of Fame inductees in the decision making process for a new location. We are not aware of any who find the railing an acceptable new location for these plaques honoring our local legends. Thank you for your consideration. Against INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON THE COST EVAULATION AND STAFFING MODELS TO INCREASE PUBLIC SAFETY PRESENCE ON THE STRAND, BEACH, AND PARKS - 26-PD- 007 Vincent Busam Looking at ways to make Hermosa safer, a LOT of attention recently has been focused on e-bikes. What has been missed is motor vehicle safety, where many people have been killed in collisions in and around our city the past few years, including two of our local students. If we're ready to fund increased e-bike enforcement, we should also be ready to proportionally fund improvements to motor vehicle safety. This could come in the form of increased patrolling, but a better way would be to collaborate with our neighboring beach cities and CalTrans on improving safety on our shared roads - PCH & Aviation, by physically modifying the streets to discourage dangerous driving. No Position Page 17 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL CITY COUNCIL DOWNTOWN LIGHTING AND BEAUTIFICATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT ON EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 20252026 BEAUTIFICATION FUNDING - 26-PW- 013 Randy Balik Just a suggestion to continue this item to a future date. I know that downtown lighting and beautification is an important topic and has been for quite a while (and I generally support it!). But in speaking with some local business owners, who are really at the tip of the pyramid of those who will benefit, I've heard multiple folks suggest that this item its current form needs a bit more time for review. Seems to me it wouldn't hurt to continue this one for a bit and seek more thorough input, and that thorough input can only be developed with a bit more review time and discussion. No Position KELLY COURTS PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS - 26-PR- 015 Charlene Penna Hello City Council, I am a Hermosa Beach resident of 37 years and an avid pickleball player. I mostly play at a private club 30 minutes away, paying for memberships in other cities, because even with the four Kelly Courts after renovation, local access is very limited. Playing locally would allow me to stay active and connect with neighbors in my own community. I understand some neighbors are concerned about noise, and I hope the staffs recommendation to designate Courts 1 and 2 for reservation and open walk-on play, Courts 3 and 4 for walk-on only, along with Option 2 hours (9 a.m.9 p.m. daily), can balance everyones needs. I also encourage structured programming like leagues and round robins to make the courts welcoming for all residents. Thank you. For Page 18 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL CITY COUNCIL DOWNTOWN LIGHTING AND BEAUTIFICATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT ON EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 20252026 BEAUTIFICATION FUNDING - 26-PW- 013 Michelle Crispin Dear Mayor, Council, and Staff - On behalf of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, we want to begin by expressing our appreciation for the City Councils decision to set aside $100,000 for beautification activities intended to improve the downtown commercial district. We recognize and value the Citys willingness to invest in the public realm and in the appearance of our commercial areas. The Chamber shares the goal of creating a more attractive, welcoming, and economically vibrant downtown. We also appreciate that beautification is recognized in the Citys Economic Development Strategy as an important part of strengthening our commercial districts and overall quality of place. At the same time, that same strategy emphasizes that implementation should occur in collaboration with the Chamber of Commerce and with input from the community as part of our beautification efforts. Accordingly, the Chamber respectfully requests that the City Council defer final approval of the expenditure plan to a future meeting date and allow time for broader Chamber led outreach to downtown businesses and stakeholders. A continuation would allow the Chamber to gather practical feedback from businesses and provide the Council with more informed input on which improvements would be most visible, most valued, and most supportive of economic activity. We also respectfully request that the City provide the relevant materials used to develop this recommendation, including memoranda, action minutes, meeting summaries, and other background documents, so the Chamber can provide informed feedback. Thank you for your consideration and for your continued support of Hermosa Beachs commercial districts. Sincerely, No Position MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2025-26 - 26-AS-023 mc guerry I oppose discontinuing funding for the BCT 109. I use it to get to other places in the South Bay. Instead, you should increase funding for it and then increase its frequency. This would be a much better use of funds than more pickleball courts. Against Page 19 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL CITY COUNCIL DOWNTOWN LIGHTING AND BEAUTIFICATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT ON EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 20252026 BEAUTIFICATION FUNDING - 26-PW- 013 Nancy Schwappach Hello. I also request this item be removed from the consent calendar and continued to another date. If Council chooses not to continue it to another date, please consider the following: 1. This subcommittee was established at the 5/13/25 Council meeting as a Downtown Lighting and Beautification subcommittee, yet none of the proposed projects are in the downtown area. 2. I read the 1/8/26 staff memo (attached) which described challenges related to proposed downtown projects - string lights, hanging planters, enhanced landscaping - so that may explain why the subcommittee changed scope. 3. However, the subcommittee having changed scope, and proposing enhancing a few planters scattered throughout the City seems fundamentally different than the original mission. 4. I fully support undertaking necessary maintenance, repairs and improvements to the vintage signs. I was not clear on the "brick repairs" but, subject to that, it seems $500 is allocated to vintage sign repair. That seems a maintenance item but if there is insufficient budget for this, perhaps $500 (plus any portion of the brick repair item) of the $100,000 allocated to "beautification" in the Capital Improvement Budget could go toward that. 5. I suggest landscape and planter enhancements, which are sorely needed, become their own item like streets, sidewalks, etc. This would allow time for a more thorough review of priorities (safety) and scope. Thank you for your consideration. No Position https://pub- hermosabeach.escr ibemeetings.com/Fi leStream.ashx?Doc umentId=55906 Page 20 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF MARCH 12, 2026 - 26-PW-015 mc guerry I urge you to work on getting CIP 143 moving again. PCH is a dangerous street for everyone who uses it and needs the improvement in mobility, accessibility, and safety that this project will bring. No Position MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2025-26 - 26-AS-023 Tyron Gunn On behalf of Beach Cities Transit, our agency values its partnership with the City of Hermosa Beach. The services we provide are designed to support mobility, reduce congestion, and enhance regional connectivity for residents, workers, and visitors. We are proud to serve Hermosa Beach with Line 109 and our Dial-a-Ride program and hope to continue this partnership into the future. We understand the City's interest in obtaining city-specific ridership data. Hermosa Beach staff amended our FY 2025-26 agreement to require the reporting of Metro's "Daily A102" report, which details daily Metro TAP card transactions. We were happy to share this report; however, the report is managed by Metro and BCT does not control the completeness of the data. This report also does not capture all riders, only those paying fare via a Metro TAP card. To address this need for stop-level data, we recently asked our bus operators to begin manually counting activity at each bus stop. Between November 1, 2025 and March 10, 2026 approximately 910 riders boarded Line 109 within Hermosa Beach and approximately 1,130 riders disembarked within Hermosa Beach. This new data was made available to Hermosa Beach staff during a meeting on March 19, 2026. Thank you for your consideration, Tyron Gunn City of Redondo Beach, Transit Manager No Position Page 21 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL PUBLIC COMMENT tonyhiggins Dear City Council, PLAN Hermosa prioritizes street safety and traffic calming to moderate vehicle speeds. However, despite these goals, a recent HBPD report reveals that the city hasnt issued a single speeding ticket on busy residential collector roads like Prospect, Ardmore, Gould, 27th Street, or Manhattan Avenue in over two years. While the City Council quickly reduced speed limits to 20 mph on Pier and Hermosa Avenues downtown, they refuse to publicly consider similar reductions for these RESIDENTIAL streetseven those that clearly qualify. Incumbents Jackson, Saemann, and Francois, all up for re-election this November, owe the public an explanation for this inconsistency. If they won't prioritize the safety of our residential neighborhoods, its time to elect leaders who will. No Position Page 22 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL CITY COUNCIL DOWNTOWN LIGHTING AND BEAUTIFICATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT ON EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 20252026 BEAUTIFICATION FUNDING - 26-PW- 013 Nancy Schwappach Hello again. This is a supplement to my first e-comment, as to which it has been suggested I buried the lede. So, I request Council pull this item from the consent calendar and continue discussion to a future meeting. If Council pulls this item and elects to discuss and decide at this meeting, I request $500 plus whatever in the "brick replacement" line item is attributable to the vintage signs, be spent on the vintage sign repair. I request the balance of the $100,000 designated in the Capital Improvement budget for downtown lighting, wayfinding and beautification, remain in the piggy bank until the community has the opportunity to determine how best to spend those funds for those purposes. See my earlier e-comment for a further explanation. Thank you for your consideration of these remarks and your service to our city. No Position MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2025-26 - 26-AS-023 Alex Fineman I urge the City to continue funding BCT 109. As a former Hermosa Beach resident and current Redondo Beach resident, I've been using BCT for over a decade and lately, using BCT 109 as a means to visit downtown Hermosa Beach without having to worry about parking. For a City that struggles with meeting its parking demand, BCT should be seen as part of the solution to the problem, not a minor line item to be deleted. Furthermore, BCT 109 now provides a one-seat ride from Hermosa Beach to the new LAX people mover, and should be promoted to its residents as an easy, affordable way to reach the airport. The City should take the opportunity to invest in BCT and improve its service, not defund it. No Position Page 23 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL KELLY COURTS PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS - 26-PR- 015 Yu-Shen Ng I'm a resident of Hermosa Beach. I live on 11th street, within 1 block of the Kelly Courts. I encourage the Council to open the courts for the maximum time possible: Option 2. Twice a week, I already drive too far (10 to 20 minutes away) to find courts that are already too busy (wait times of 10-15 minutes for every 15 minutes of play). There just aren't enough courts in the area, even with recent additions of new courts in Redondo Beach (at Alta Vista) and upcoming additions in Torrance (at Wilson Park). Please help. I particularly recommend drop-in open play. It's more community-oriented and enables greater utility for all. All 4 courts should allocate significant time for drop-in open play; if only 2 courts are available for drop-in open play, there won't be a critical mass of players. Thanks! For Page 24 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL KELLY COURTS PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS - 26-PR- 015 Kimberly Noble Im a Hermosa Beach resident of 12 years, and Im writing to express my strong support for expanding access to the Kelly Pickleball Courts. Specifically, I urge you to adopt Option B and extend court hours to 9am9pm daily. This decision will best meet the needs of our community today. While I appreciate the planned expansion from two to four courts, demand for pickleball locally is high and continues to grow rapidly, Four courts is still not many, and access will remain constrained without expanded hours. Pickleball has become a positive, healthy, and social outlet for all ages, and yet, current availability doesn't come close to meeting demand. Expanding hours is a practical and immediate way to better serve a large and active group of residents while also helping to reduce demand during peak times. While I understand there have been concerns raised by nearby neighbors, its important to recognize that these courts are located within a public park, where recreational activity and associated noise are to be expected. At present, the limitations appear to place disproportionate weight on a relatively small number of resident complaints, while restricting access for a much broader segment of the community. Expanding court availability to 9am9pm will ensures more equitable access and promotes another avenue for healthy activity and social connection in our little beach town. Thank you for your consideration and for supporting a solution that better reflects the needs of the community. For Page 25 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) 623 REGARDING MUNICIPAL PIER STRUCTURAL INSPECTION AND EVALUATION, REPAIR, AND REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT tonyhiggins Total Costs by 2070 Replace Strategy: ~$105 million (Cumulative). Repair Strategy: ~$210 million (Cumulative). Breakeven Year: Approximately 2053. I guess the only question is does Hermosa need a $105 million pier at all? That's way above my pay grade. Note: it might cost $10-20 million to tear down the pier - CITY COUNCIL DOWNTOWN LIGHTING AND BEAUTIFICATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT ON EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 20252026 BEAUTIFICATION FUNDING - 26-PW- 013 Jeff Raedy Please consider removing this item from this meetings consent calendar and moving to a later date. I have no issue with the particular beautification projects, per se, but I believe there are downtown business owners who would like more time to coordinate and provide feedback on these projects or others they may prefer for the same budget. Continuation to a future agenda would allow them this coordination time. No Position Page 26 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL KELLY COURTS PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS - 26-PR- 015 Amy Huang Im a Hermosa Beach resident of 8 years, and Im writing to express my strong support for expanding access to the Kelly Pickleball Courts. Specifically, I urge you to adopt Option B and extend court hours to 9am9pm daily. This decision will best meet the needs of our community today. While I appreciate the planned expansion from two to four courts, demand for pickleball locally is high and continues to grow rapidly, Four courts is still not many, and access will remain constrained without expanded hours. Pickleball has become a positive, healthy, and social outlet for all ages, and yet, current availability doesn't come close to meeting demand. Expanding hours is a practical and immediate way to better serve a large and active group of residents while also helping to reduce demand during peak times. While I understand there have been concerns raised by nearby neighbors, its important to recognize that these courts are located within a public park, where recreational activity and associated noise are to be expected. At present, the limitations appear to place disproportionate weight on a relatively small number of resident complaints, while restricting access for a much broader segment of the community. Expanding court availability to 9am9pm will ensures more equitable access and promotes another avenue for healthy activity and social connection in our little beach town. Thank you for your consideration and for supporting a solution that better reflects the needs of the community. - Page 27 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL CITY COUNCIL DOWNTOWN LIGHTING AND BEAUTIFICATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT ON EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 20252026 BEAUTIFICATION FUNDING - 26-PW- 013 Adam Malovani Please consider removing this item from this meetings consent calendar and moving to a later date. I believe there are downtown business owners and The Chamber who would like more time to coordinate and provide feedback on these projects or others they may prefer for the same budget. Continuation to a future agenda would allow them this coordination time. No Position PUBLIC COMMENT Robert Aronoff The review of the budget later this evening shows the wisdom of getting rid of Suja Lowenthal as the City Manager. It is apparent that the shortfall has been caused by her: Having unnecessary expenses in the city managers office, Hiring an assistant city manager, Having unreasonably delayed the completion of the Clark Building renovation, and Hiring a search firm to replace her. Against Page 28 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON THE COST EVAULATION AND STAFFING MODELS TO INCREASE PUBLIC SAFETY PRESENCE ON THE STRAND, BEACH, AND PARKS - 26-PD- 007 Robert Aronoff More enforcement is necessary. I like Option 1. I live on the The Strand and witness first hand the constant and voluminous e-bike violations. This past Saturday I observed HBPD has officers doing e-bike enforcement at 2nd and Strand. The workd got out very quickly and just the fact that enforcement was in progress cut in my estimate 90% of the violations. The violators suddenly weren't there. Enforcement is effective. For MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2025-26 - 26-AS-023 Robert Aronoff Please make public and examine what litigation is causing you to increase the budget by $200,000 ( almost 50%) for the City Attorney. Hermosa's legal costs for both attorneys and payments on legal cases is higher than in the other beach cities. This is the time to examine this more closely and not just pass over it as consent item. No Position Page 29 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL KELLY COURTS PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS - 26-PR- 015 Mary Stevens I am a Hermosa resident of 15 years and am wriring to support Option 1, to add Sunday hours for pickleball. I understand the importance of being thoughtful to neighbors as well as the strong demand for play. The courts are consistently full and difficult to reserve, leading to locals often choosing out-of- town options at high prices. It is also clear that noise is a real consideration for nearby residents and that while living near a park does not guarantee silence, it should expect reasonable sound mitigation. Option 1 is a balanced starting point, adding Sunday 9am-4pm hours to the current schedule. It increases access while still maintaining reasonable limits for the surrounding neighborhood. Recommended additional for a critical next step - Fund a professional sound study (within several months of reopening) that measures the actual impacts (sound levels, duration, frequency) nearby. And then use this data to evaluate the possibility of exanding to Option 2 (9am-9pm daily). A sound study would support recreation and community wellness while basing future decisions on real data, not assumptions. This demonstrates a thoughtful balance between public access and neighboorhood quality of life. Pickleball is an important part of Hermosa's community life and a phased, evidence-based approach would allow the city to move forward responsibly. Thank you for your consideration! For Page 30 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL KELLY COURTS PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS - 26-PR- 015 Anna Garcia Im a 11-year Hermosa Beach resident, a pickleball player, and I live near the courts. Im writing to strongly support expanding court hours. Option 2 (9 a.m. 9 p.m. daily) is the most ideal and truly reflects the level of demand. The courts are consistently full. Even living nearby, Ive only been able to reserve a court twice in the past two years. Residents pay a $20 annual membership, yet Parks and Recreation is upfront with all applicants that reservations are very difficult and not guaranteed. Its frustrating to be able to walk to the courts, but still have to drive 1520 minutes to find a place to play. At the same time, I understand the concerns around noise. Living near Clark Field means living with activityits part of a shared community space. The goal should be balance. I also recognize that pickleball courts can be contentious. Thats exactly why its important for the City to rely on facts. A professional sound study within 120 days of reopening will help guide future decisions and confirm whether the court renovations and mitigation efforts are working. Thank you for your consideration. For PUBLIC COMMENT mc guerry Looks like Robert Aronoff is pulling from Trump's playback by blaming the failures of the current City Manager and council on the previous City Manager. None of his points make sense, but I am sure he will try to blame her for everything that goes wrong for years to come. No Position Page 31 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL KELLY COURTS PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS - 26-PR- 015 Linda Trinh Dear Council Members, Im a Hermosa Beach resident and pickleball player of two years. Im writing to ask if the city would consider expanding court availability to include some evening and weekend hours. Specifically expand evening hours, daily 9am to 9pm would be great. I used to be able to catch a Friday game when my schedule allowed, but honestly, even then it was really hard to get a court Fridays fill up fast! Now that my work schedule has changed to standard MondayFriday, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., getting out there during the day just isnt an option anymore. Id love to be able to play a few evenings after work or on the weekends. Its honestly one of my favorite ways to decompress, get some exercise, and hang out with people in the community. I really appreciate everything the city does for its residents, and I hope this is something the Council can look into. Thanks so much for your time! No Position Page 32 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL KELLY COURTS PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS - 26-PR- 015 Monica Beeferman I am writing to express my support for option 2 (courts open daily from 9am to 9pm). I have been a resident of Hermosa Beach for almost 7 years. I moved here right after college and fell in love with the community, especially the well maintained and accessible public spaces. As someone who works full time, evenings and weekends are the only times I can benefit from the city resources, such as the pickleball courts. Opening the courts from 9am-9pm daily will make them much more accessible to all residents and limit the competition associated with reserving a court currently. I understand that pickleball can be noisy, but so are all of the other activities that take place at a public park. There is no reason this sport should be limited any differently. For Page 33 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2025-26 - 26-AS-023 Laura Pena Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Staff - I appreciate the effort to address current needs, but I remain concerned that the City is continuing to rely on one time funds to balance a budget that staff describes as facing ongoing structural deficits. I respectfully ask Council to focus on the longer term picture before approving the full package as presented. The five year forecast shows expenditures rising well above revenues by FY 203031. What is the specific plan to close that gap in a sustainable way, rather than continuing to rely on one-time solutions? Relatedly, before the estimated remaining unspent FY 202425 funds are assigned, I would appreciate clarity on what legal or policy constraints apply to those dollars and whether any portion can be leveraged in a way that permanently reduces the Citys structural deficit, rather than simply backfilling another year. QUESTIONS: 1.I also have questions about the proposed increase to Community Development contract services. If the goal is to improve plan review capacity, permit processing, and state reporting, how will success be measured? What are the current turnaround times, what improvement is expected, and when will Council and the public see performance data showing whether this added spending is actually producing faster and more reliable service? I also encourage Council to consider an expedited review pathway, where legally appropriate, for revenue generating projects and permits that can strengthen the tax base, support local business activity, and improve investment confidence. In a period of structural deficits, the City should be looking not only at cost control, but also at how to responsibly accelerate projects that produce No Position Page 34 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL KELLY COURTS PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS - 26-PR- 015 Bobby Oh Im a long-time Hermosa Beach resident and live a few houses from Clark Field, so I hear park activity regularly and also understand how noise can impact neighbors. I strongly support expanding hours, and I think Option 2 (9 a.m. 9 p.m. daily) is the most ideal since the courts are consistently full. That said, I understand why starting with Option 1 makes sense right now. Pickleball brings real health and community benefits, and the City has already invested in these courtsit makes sense to fully use them. In a compact, busy city like Hermosa, some level of sound is part of living near parkslike the regular sounds from little league at Clark Fieldwhile still being respectful of those nearby. The demand is there, the investment is thereits time to make the most of these courts for the community. For Page 35 of 1126 City Council Regular Meeting - March 24, 2026 Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name Comment Position Attachment URL KELLY COURTS PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS - 26-PR- 015 Mary Young I am a 36-year resident of Hermosa Beach, and have truly valued the city's emphasis on health, outdoor activity, and sports. I am an avid pickleball player but often have to go to neighboring cities to play due to court shortage or hours. While we are excited about the new courts, the limited hours make it difficult for working people or students to play. I strongly support expanding hours and continuing the reservation system at least in the mornings. Other cities have expanded access and hours, and I trust that Hermosa will embrace this sport that has come to mean so much to so many. Page 36 of 1126 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 10, 2026 5:00 p.m. Council Chambers 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Members Present: Councilmember Rob Saemann, Mayor Mike Detoy, Councilmember Ray Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Michael D. Keegan, Councilmember Dean Francois Staff Present: City Manager Steve Napolitano, Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore, Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker, Interim City Clerk Ann Yang, Community Development Director Alison Becker, Community Resources Director Lisa Nichols, Public Works Director Joe SanClemente, Police Chief Landon Phillips, Interim Deputy City Clerk Ariana Rodriguez, Environmental Programs Manager Doug Krauss, Lead Special Events and Filming Coordinator Kalyn Kaemerle, Senior Management Analyst Kenneth Bales, Planning Manager Alexis Oropeza _____________________________________________________________________ 1. CLOSED SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 5:00 PM Mayor Detoy called the Closed Session meeting to order at 5:03 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Councilmember Saemann was not present for roll call Interim Deputy City Clerk Ariana Rodriguez announced a quorum. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA Mayor Detoy opened public comment. No public comment was provided. 4. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION The City Council recessed to Closed Session at 5:05 p.m. 4.a MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on February 3, 2026. Page 37 of 1126 2 4.b CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1) Name of Case: City of Hermosa Beach v. Independent Cities Risk Management Authority Case Number: 22TRCV00700 4.c CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Pursuant to California Government Code section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Tyler Cashman, Interim Human Resources Manager Organizations: Teamsters, Professional and Medical Employees’ Union, Local 986 Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association 5. OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM Mayor Detoy called the Open Session to order at 6:05 p.m. 6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Kaci McCrossen. 7. ROLL CALL Interim Deputy City Clerk Ariana Rodriguez announced a quorum. 8. CLOSED SESSION REPORT Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore provided the Closed Session Report. No reportable action was taken. Mayor Detoy announced that Councilmember Saemann was present in Closed Session. 9. ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS Mayor Detoy provided the following announcements: Student Scholarship Opportunity Hermosa Beach Friends of the Library is a nonprofit dedicated to promoting literacy, education, culture, and community in Hermosa Beach and the South Bay. Their 2026 Student Scholarship Program is now accepting applications. They will award two $1,000 scholarships through a writing competition open to high school juniors and seniors attending schools in Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach, and Redondo Beach. Students may submit essays in Creative Writing or Historical Research. Essays must be 500 to 750 words and will be judged through a blind review process. The application deadline is April 3, 2026. More information is available at hbfol.org/scholarship St. Patrick’s Day Parade Page 38 of 1126 3 The Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce will host the 30th Annual St. Patrick’s Day Parade this Saturday, March 14th, from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. All are welcome to join this family-friendly event featuring some of our community’s favorite local bands, nonprofits, vehicles, brands and more. To accommodate the event, residents and visitors should be aware of the following temporary street closures this Saturday: • Valley Drive between 18th Street and 11th Street, from 5am–3pm • Pier Ave and Hermosa Ave between 13th Street and 8th Street, from 7am– 3pm City Manager Steve Napolitano provided an announcement on the St. Patrick's Day Parade. 10. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Moved by: Councilmember Francois Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan To pull Item 15. i, move Item 17.b after Item 16.a, and approve the remainder of the agenda. Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 11. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS 11.a PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING RED CROSS MONTH Andrea Reilly from the Red Cross Community Volunteer Liaison spoke. Mayor Detoy read a proclamation into the record. 11.b PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING WOMEN’S HISTORY MONTH Kaci McCrossen from HERmosa Circle spoke about the organization. Mayor Detoy read a proclamation into the record. 11.c LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PRESENTATION ON THE SOUTH BAY CITIES MAIN TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT Michael Chee Public Information Officer and C.K. Kanda Resident Engineer from the Los Angeles County Sanitation District and provided a Presentation. Councilmember Saemann asked various questions. Mayor Detoy provided information. Page 39 of 1126 4 12. PUBLIC COMMENT Mayor Detoy opened public comment. The following public comment was provided. In Person Public Comment: • Sarah Harper • Nancy Schwappach • Eric Horne • Elka Worner Virtual Public Comment: • Matt McCool 13. CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS No comments were provided. 14. UPDATES ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITIES 15. CONSENT CALENDAR Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan To approve the consent calendar. Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 15.a WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan To waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived. Motion Carried 15.b CITY COUNCIL MINUTES (Interim City Clerk Ann Yang) Page 40 of 1126 5 Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan To approve the minutes of the February 24, 2026 special meeting. 15.c CHECK REGISTERS - 26-AS-020 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan To receive and file the check registers for February 18, 2026 through February 26, 2026. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands. Motion Carried 15.d ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT DURING FY 2026–2027 - 26-PW-008 CEQA: Determine the resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan To determine the resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and adopt Resolution No. RES-26-7541 to approve the preparation of a report for the annual levy of assessments within the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District during Fiscal Year 2026–2027. Motion Carried 15.e APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ON-CALL STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE SERVICES WITH RON'S MAINTENANCE, INC - 26-PW-006 CEQA: Determine the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5). (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Page 41 of 1126 6 To determine the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5), approve the proposed amendment to the agreement with Ron’s Maintenance, Inc. for On-call Storm Drain Catch Basin Maintenance Services, extending the contract term through June 30, 2027, and increasing the total not-to- exceed contract amount from $173,351 to $218,632; authorize the Director of Public Works to increase the annual project contingency from $10,000 to $15,000 per year for Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27; and authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendment, approve minor non-substantive modifications if necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk attesting the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney. Motion Carried 15.f ADOPT A RESOLUTION AND APPROVE THE INCREASE OF PROJECT CONTINGENCY TO CIP 630 COMMUNITY CENTER GAS LINE REPAIRS - 26-PW-010 CEQA: Determine that CIP 630, Community Center Gas Line Repairs, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan To determine that CIP 630, Community Center Gas Line Repairs is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities); adopt Resolution No. RES- 26-7542 authorizing the increase in project contingency by $42,000 from $46,600 to $88,600 for CIP 630 Community Center Gas Line Repairs project for a total authorized amount of $321,600; and authorize the Director of Public Works to approve contract change orders up to the approved project contingency amount. Motion Carried 15.g APPROVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE JANITORIAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH XANADU SYSTEM SERVICES - 26-PW- 007 CEQA: The action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5), as it consists of administrative activities that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment. The amendment pertains to ongoing custodial services within existing facilities. (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Page 42 of 1126 7 Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan To determine that the Second Amendment to the Janitorial Services Contract with Xanadu System Services is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(5) (administrative activities); approve the second amendment to the agreement with Xanadu Service Systems for janitorial services, adding additional services for the remainder of Fiscal Year (FY) 25-26, extending the contract term through June 30, 2027, and increasing the total not-to- exceed contract amount from $651,696 to $895,313;a uthorize the Director of Public Works to increase the established project contingency per year from $10,000 to $15,000 per year starting in FY 26-27; and authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendment, approve minor non-substantive modifications if necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk attesting the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney. Motion Carried 15.h APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH THE ARC SOUTH BAY FOR USE OF COMMUNITY CENTER ROOMS 15 AND 17 - 26-PR-005 (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan To consider approval of a lease agreement with The Arc South Bay for use of the Community Center rooms 15 and 17 beginning April 1, 2026 through March 31, 2027 with the option, at staff’s discretion, to extend for two additional one-year terms; and authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest, subject to approval by the City Attorney. Motion Carried 15.j APPROVE A CONTRACT TO GEOSYNTEC FOR PROFESSIONAL STORMWATER CONSULTING SERVICES - 26-CMO-002 (Environmental Programs Manager Doug Krauss) Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan To aprove a Professional Services Agreement with Geosyntec Consultants to develop a feasibility study for a dry well project at a not to exceed amount of $65,000 for a term of two years ending January 13, 2028, with an option to extend one year and authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed agreements, and approve minor modifications if necessary, Page 43 of 1126 8 with the City Clerk attesting the proposed agreements and subject to approval by the City Attorney. Motion Carried 15.i APPROVE A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR SENATE BILL 84 DISABILITY ACCESS: CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ACCESSIBILITY CLAIMS: NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND OPPORTUNITY TO CORRECT - 26-CMO-010 (Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo) Councilmember Francois asked various questions. City Manager Steve Napolitano provided information. Moved by: Councilmember Francois Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan To approve a letter of support for Senate Bill 84, including website accessibility protections, and direct staff to also transmit the letter to the League of California Cities Ayes (4): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Absent (1): Councilmember Jackson Motion Carried 16. PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M 16.a APPROVAL OF IMPACT LEVEL III NEW SPECIAL EVENT – AFTER DARK TOUR LA 2026 - 26-PR-004 Continued from meeting of February 24, 2026 (Lead Special Events and Filming Coordinator Kalyn Kaemerle) Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols provided an announcement and introduced Lead Special Events and Film Coordinator Kalyn Kaemerle. Lead Special Events and Film Coordinator Kalyn Kaemerle provided a staff presentation. City Attorney Jason Baltimore provided information. Councilmember Francois provided comments. After Dark Tour LA 2026 event representatives Britany Knight and Jake Wanamaker provided a presentation. Page 44 of 1126 9 Councilmember Saemann asked various questions. Councilmember Francois asked various questions. Mayor Pro Tem Keegan asked various questions. Councilmember Saemann asked questions about financial packages. Mayor Detoy asked various questions about event clean up After Dark Tour LA 2026 event representatives Britany Knight and Jake Wanamaker provided information. In Person Public Comment: • Gregory Patten • Jake Taylor • Robert Campball • Sarah Musgrove • Bob Leetch • Nicole Nevhauser • Brynn Condy • Renee Williams-Smith • Mario Montoya • Alexandra Manss • Kiana Nicio • Briana Sharp • Sam V. • Michelle Crispin • Laura Pena • Barbara Ellman • Alan Jeffery Virtual Public Comment: • Tony Higgins • Matt McCool • Anna Liza Page 45 of 1126 10 The City Council continued to deliberate on this item. Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan To approve the Nike After Dark run, contingent upon a voluntary $50,000 community impact fee to the City, an additional $50,000 charitable contribution through Nike’s charitable arm to Friends of the Park for youth sports and recreation, 100 tickets for Hermosa Beach residents, and engagement with the Chamber and local musicians for collaboration opportunities. Substitute Motion Moved by: Councilmember Saemann Seconded by: Councilmember Francois To approve the inclusion of the After Dark Tour LA 2026 on the 2026 Special Events Calendar contingent on additional negotiations, a preferred date of October 24, and continue the public hearing to April 14, 2026. Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 16.b INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND HBMC SECTION 3.32 TITLED TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX - 26-CMO-009 (Senior Management Analyst Ken Bales) Senior Management Analyst Ken Bales provided a staff presentation. No public comment was provided. Moved by: Councilmember Saemann Seconded by: Councilmember Francois To introduce by title only and waive first reading of ordinance No. ORD-26- 1497 updating the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 3.32.020 Definitions, 3.32.030 Tax Imposed; and 3.32.100 Appeal. Ayes (4): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Absent (1): Councilmember Jackson Motion Carried 16.c INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 17.21 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE Page 46 of 1126 11 RELATING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS - 26-CDD-025 CEQA: Determine the action to be Statutorily Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code § 21080.17. (Community Development Director Alison Becker) Associate Planner Jake Whitney provided a staff presentation. In Person Public Comment: • Allen Jeffrey There were no Virtual Public Speakers. Community Development Director Alison Becker gave outgoing remarks to Associate Planner Jake Whitney. Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Francois To determine the action to be Statutorily Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code § 21080.17; conduct a public hearing to consider repealing and replacing Chapter 17.21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code relating to Accessory (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADU); and introduce by title only and waive first reading of Ordinance No. ORD-26- 1498 approving Zone Text Amendment (TA 26-01) repealing and replacing Chapter 17.21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Ayes (4): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Absent (1): Councilmember Jackson Motion Carried 17. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 17.a ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT TO JOIN THE SOUTH BAY REGIONAL HOUSING TRUST - 26-CDD-028 CEQA: Determine the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. (Community Development Director Alison Becker) Jacki Bacharach SBCCOG Executive Director and Ronson Chu Senior Program Manager provided a presentation. Page 47 of 1126 12 Councilmember Francois asked various questions. Jacki Bacharach provided information. Associate Planner Jake Whitney provided a staff presentation. Public Speakers: • Jon David • Laura Pena There were no Virtual Public Speakers. Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Mayor Detoy To determine the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines; adopt Resolution No. RES-26-7543 approving and authorizing the execution of the Joint Powers Authority Agreement joining the South Bay Regional Housing Trust (SBRHT); and authorize the Mayor to execute the SBRHT Joint Powers Authority Agreement (JPA). Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Mayor Detoy To appoint Councilmember Seaman as the City’s representative to the Regional Housing Trust Board and Councilmember Francois as the alternate. Ayes (4): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Absent (1): Councilmember Jackson Motion Carried 17.b ADJUSTMENT OF FEES FOR COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT AREAS - 26-CMO-012 (Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss) The City Council took a recess at 8:32 p.m. The City Council reconvened at 8:37 p.m. Page 48 of 1126 13 Interim Deputy City Clerk Rodriguez conducted a roll call. All members were present. Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Kraus provided a staff presentation. Councilmember Jackson asked various various questions. Environmental Programs Manager Krause provided information. City Manager Napolitano provided information. Councilmember Francois asked various questions. Councilmember Saemann asked various questions. In Person Public Comment: • Jon David • Elka Worner • Laura Pena • Lana Istwani • Michelle Crispin Moved by: Councilmember Francois Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan To adopt option 4, creating a new encroachment category for businesses conducting retail food sales and retail without table service and without alcohol, reduce the encroachment fee to $1 per square foot, and make the fee retroactive to the previous fiscal year when the rate increased from $1 to $2. Substitute Motion Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann To approve a new category of encroachment permit for off Pier Plaza businesses conducting retail food sales without table service and without alcohol service with an encroachment fee of $1 per square foot, and make the fee retroactive to January 1, 2026. Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried Moved by: Mayor Detoy Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Page 49 of 1126 14 To direct staff to return with a new encroachment category for retail businesses on and off Pier Plaza, including size and aesthetic guidelines, with the fee to be determined. Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 18. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 18.a TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 26-CMO-013 Mayor Detoy requested support for a future agenda item to increase the City's contract threshold limits including the City Manager's signing authority and the guidelines for consent calendar approval. The request was supported by Councilmember Francois and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan and will return to Council as an action item. Mayor Detoy requested support to reactivate the Municipal Naming Subcommittee to consider a commemorative sign at 8th Street and Ardmore Avenue to honor the life and service of Torrance Police Officer Gary Elton Rippstein. Councilmember Saemann provided support. The request did not receive sufficient support to be placed on a future agenda as an action item, and Mayor Detoy rescinded his request. Councilmember Saemann requested a letter of support for Assembly Bill 1942 (Bauer-Kahan) which proposes mandatory registration and special license plates for Class 2 and Class 3 electric bicycles through the DMV. Mayor Pro Tem Keegan provided support. The item will return to Council as an informational item. 19. CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager Steve Napolitano provided a reminder about the 2026-2027 residential parking permit grace period. 20. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 20.a POLICE CRIME STATISTICS FOR JANUARY 2026 (Police Chief Landon Phillips) 20.b ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 10, 2026 (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) 20.c PARKING CITATION AND METERED REVENUE REPORT— FEBRUARY 2026 (Senior Management Analyst Ken Bales) Page 50 of 1126 15 21. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:19 p.m. Page 51 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-AS-021 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CHECK REGISTERS (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for March 4, 2026 (Attachment 1) through March 11, 2026 (Attachment 2). The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands. Attachments: 1. Check Register 3/4/2026 2. Check Register 3/11/2026 Respectfully Submitted by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 52 of 1126 03/04/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 2:16:00PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111409 3/4/2026 4IMPRINT 30880189 WTF PROMO ITEMS16513 001-3302-4201 317.50 001-3302-4201 130.53 Total : 448.0316513 111410 3/4/2026 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CO OP 260104 TAXI VOUCHER PROGRAM - JAN2611437 145-3404-4201 1,206.47 145-3853 -53.00 Total : 1,153.4711437 111411 3/4/2026 ALI, KATIE PO45335 CITATION (32033452) REFUND - DUPLICATE24045 001-3302 83.00 Total : 83.0024045 111412 3/4/2026 ANGELS BASEBALL LP 178989 EXCURSION: ANGELS GAME 5.17.26 FINAL24007 001-4601-4201 2,075.00 Total : 2,075.0024007 111413 3/4/2026 AT&T 000024814129 PD COMPUTER CIRCUITS/JAN2600321 001-2101-4304 130.66 Total : 130.6600321 111414 3/4/2026 ATS SERVICES PO45336 CITATION (43031799) REFUND - DUPLICATE24049 001-3302 93.00 Total : 93.0024049 111415 3/4/2026 AVILA, PAUL PO45325 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT-SPRING2623877 001-1204-4317 2,447.00 Total : 2,447.0023877 111416 3/4/2026 BARROWS, PATRICK PO45337 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT - CLASS 1229617271 001-4601-4221 75.60 Total : 75.6017271 111417 3/4/2026 BEACHSPORTS PO45338 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT - CLASS 1246518036 001-4601-4221 343.64 Total : 343.6418036 111418 3/4/2026 BENSON, MARY ANN Parcel 4182 019 005 STREET LIGHT TAX REBATE/202520396 Attachment 1Page 53 of 1126 03/04/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 2:16:00PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111418 3/4/2026 (Continued)BENSON, MARY ANN20396 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.6120396 111419 3/4/2026 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS PO45333 BLDG STANDARDS ADMIN FEE 4/1/24-12/31/2515663 001-3204 3,070.00 Total : 3,070.0015663 111420 3/4/2026 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 7626 MR#591396 NAMEPLATES00262 001-4601-4201 19.00 001-4101-4305 38.00 001-4601-4201 1.85 001-4101-4305 3.71 Total : 62.5600262 111421 3/4/2026 CAMPBELL, CELESTE PO45339 CITATION (44022686) REFUND - DUPLICATE24048 001-3302 88.00 Total : 88.0024048 111422 3/4/2026 CASHMAN, TYLER PO45322 TR1273 REIMB-LCW EMPLOYMENT LAW CONF24021 001-1203-4317 889.25 Total : 889.2524021 111423 3/4/2026 CDWG AI2JJ3L MR#909785 PRINTER TONER09632 715-1206-4305 312.96 Total : 312.9609632 111424 3/4/2026 CEM CONSTRUCTION CORP 26-005 GREENWICH UUAD CONST SVS/SEPT25-JAN2623873 313-8114-4201 103,433.13 Total : 103,433.1323873 111425 3/4/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188398301021426 1301 HERMOSA/540 PIER CONNECTION/FEB2620236 001-2101-4304 784.25 Total : 784.2520236 111426 3/4/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188397001021426 PW YARD CABLE/MAR2620236 001-4204-4201 192.94 Total : 192.9420236 111427 3/4/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188398901021426 PD CABLE/FEB2620236 Page 54 of 1126 03/04/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 2:16:00PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111427 3/4/2026 (Continued)CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS20236 001-2101-4201 110.54 Total : 110.5420236 111428 3/4/2026 CHOICE MEDIATION 22626 ADMIN CITATION HEARING SVS/FEB2622990 001-1201-4201 600.00 Total : 600.0022990 111429 3/4/2026 CLEAN ENERGY CE12832611 COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS/FEB2609694 715-3109-4310 49.47 Total : 49.4709694 111430 3/4/2026 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES REPW26020904760 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/JAN2600879 001-3104-4251 526.24 Total : 526.2400879 111431 3/4/2026 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES C0014082 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES/APR2620781 001-2202-4251 574,215.00 Total : 574,215.0020781 111432 3/4/2026 CWE CORPORATION F25548 LOT C REPAIR DESIGN/AUG2517920 301-8699-4201 307.00 LOT C ENGINEERING SERVICES/DEC25F26077 190-8699-4201 36,520.00 Total : 36,827.0017920 111433 3/4/2026 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 021378 MR782316/805332 FINGERPRINTING/JAN2600364 001-2101-4251 93.00 001-1203-4251 32.00 Total : 125.0000364 111434 3/4/2026 DEWEY PEST CONTROL ACCT 759408 CITYWIDE PEST CONTROL/FEB2611449 001-4204-4201 1,060.00 Total : 1,060.0011449 111435 3/4/2026 DEWEY PEST CONTROL ACCT 1551854 TERMITE TREATMENT-BARD ST TRAILER11449 715-4204-4201 750.00 Total : 750.0011449 111436 3/4/2026 DEWEY PEST CONTROL ACCT 1233239 SEWER RAT ABATEMENT/FEB2611449 Page 55 of 1126 03/04/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 2:16:00PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111436 3/4/2026 (Continued)DEWEY PEST CONTROL11449 160-3102-4201 278.00 Total : 278.0011449 111437 3/4/2026 ESQUIVEL, ANNA PO44395 CITATION (32029051) REFUND - OVERPAID23846 001-3302 83.00 Total : 83.0023846 111438 3/4/2026 EVIDENT 256549A EVIDENCE SUPPLIES24057 001-2101-4305 309.74 Total : 309.7424057 111439 3/4/2026 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 109-1107801 MR#973886 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PARTS22926 715-6101-4311 78.80 MR#973887 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PARTS109-1107907 715-6101-4311 141.57 Total : 220.3722926 111440 3/4/2026 FLOCK SAFETY 84499 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION23027 153-2106-5405 30,000.00 Total : 30,000.0023027 111441 3/4/2026 GALL, TINA KATCHEN 022-012026 CDBG ADMIN & LABOR COMPL/JAN2622871 001-4202-4201 1,365.00 Total : 1,365.0022871 111442 3/4/2026 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 438642704 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION - ST LIGHT SYSTEM20945 105-2601-4201 4,620.00 Total : 4,620.0020945 111443 3/4/2026 GRAINGER 9823652368 MAT REQ 473259/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES10836 160-3102-4201 892.38 MAT REQ 473260/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES9826990856 160-3102-4201 892.38 Total : 1,784.7610836 111444 3/4/2026 H.W. LOCHNER, INC.000024056-5 LOT C IMPROVEMENTS/JAN2623954 301-8699-4201 40,112.31 Total : 40,112.3123954 Page 56 of 1126 03/04/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 2:16:00PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111445 3/4/2026 HABASH, SAM PO45341 CITATION (43032635) REFUND - CERT OF COR24043 001-3302 38.00 Total : 38.0024043 111446 3/4/2026 HARRINGTON, NATE PO45342 CITATION (38024629) REFUND - DUPLICATE24046 001-3302 83.00 Total : 83.0024046 111447 3/4/2026 JACKSON, RAYMOND PO45352 TR1261 REIMB-CCCA SACRAMENTO LEGISLATIVE21776 001-1101-4317 172.93 Total : 172.9321776 111448 3/4/2026 LA CO SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT 2617454BL MAT REQ 990687 INMATE MEALS/JAN2600151 001-2101-4306 189.21 Total : 189.2100151 111449 3/4/2026 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES, INC.INV-174409 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT - SEAVIEW PARK12190 125-8504-4201 4,919.66 125-8504-4201 53,758.00 VALLEY PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENTINV-175684 301-8504-4201 110,896.23 301-8504-4201 10,207.89 REPLACEMENT BUCKET SWING SEATINV-175799 001-6101-4309 570.85 001-6101-4309 50.22 Total : 180,402.8512190 111450 3/4/2026 LEARNED LUMBER ACCT 1126 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/FEB2600167 001-3104-4309 657.16 001-6101-4309 101.58 Total : 758.7400167 111451 3/4/2026 LONG, MICHAEL A.Parcel 4182 023 018 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE/202521410 001-6871 147.35 105-3105 24.61 Total : 171.9621410 111452 3/4/2026 MONROE SYSTEMS IN268502 CALCULATOR RIBBONS14344 001-1202-4305 66.00 001-1202-4305 5.27 Page 57 of 1126 03/04/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 2:16:00PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 71.27 111452 3/4/2026 MONROE SYSTEMS14344 111453 3/4/2026 MOWER, BETTE Parcel 4160 025 002 SEWER & STREET LIGHT TAX REBATE/202514723 001-6871 147.35 105-3105 24.61 Total : 171.9614723 111454 3/4/2026 O'BRIEN BENDER, JEANNE 2-2026 CITY RECORDS ORGANIZATION/FEB2622673 001-1121-4201 2,475.00 Total : 2,475.0022673 111455 3/4/2026 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 459579337001 MAT REQ 519658/OFFICE SUPPLIES13114 001-4201-4305 91.64 MAT REQ 473256/OFFICE SUPPLIES460199395001 001-4202-4305 78.55 MAT REQ 874797/OFFICE SUPPLIES460505044001 001-4202-4305 56.72 MAT REQ 874797/OFFICE SUPPLIES460509026001 001-4202-4305 34.23 MAT REQ 874798/OFFICE SUPPLIES460509262001 001-4202-4305 22.04 MAT REQ 874798/OFFICE SUPPLIES460509532001 001-4202-4305 63.78 MAT REQ 874799/OFFICE SUPPLIES460509752001 001-4202-4305 86.44 MAT REQ 874800/OFFICE SUPPLIES460510004001 001-4202-4305 66.37 MAT REQ 874800/OFFICE SUPPLIES460510265001 001-4202-4305 20.18 MAT REQ 473253/OFFICE SUPPLIES460510371001 001-4202-4305 52.67 MAT REQ 473253/OFFICE SUPPLIES460510424001 001-4202-4305 36.87 MAT REQ 473254/OFFICE SUPPLIES460528624001 001-4202-4305 72.52 MAT REQ 519659/OFFICE SUPPLIES460730620001 001-4201-4305 58.90 MAT REQ 519659/OFFICE SUPPLIES460730620002 001-4201-4305 15.98 Page 58 of 1126 03/04/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 2:16:00PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111455 3/4/2026 (Continued)ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC13114 MAT REQ 806496/OFFICE SUPPLIES460916802001 001-4601-4305 57.19 Total : 814.0813114 111456 3/4/2026 PHILLIPS, LANDON TR1270 PER DIEM-CPCA SYMPOSIUM 3.15-3.18.2611574 001-2101-4317 95.00 Total : 95.0011574 111457 3/4/2026 PLUMBERS DEPOT INC PD-60761 MR#473257 PLUMBING SUPPLIES15103 160-3102-4309 337.48 Total : 337.4815103 111458 3/4/2026 POELSTRA, GERRITT "JOE"TR1278 PER DIEM-CPCA SYMPOSIUM 3.15-3.18.2615701 001-2101-4317 95.00 Total : 95.0015701 111459 3/4/2026 PROJECT 529, INC.2188 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION22964 001-2101-4201 525.00 Total : 525.0022964 111460 3/4/2026 PROVIDENCE MEDICAL GuarantorID 1010127 SART EXAMS/NOV2501911 001-2101-4201 3,200.00 SART EXAMS/JAN26GuarantorID 1010127 001-2101-4201 1,600.00 Total : 4,800.0001911 111461 3/4/2026 PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSULTING ASSOC 901098 PRE-EMPLOYMENT EVAL - CSO19904 001-3302-4201 462.00 Total : 462.0019904 111462 3/4/2026 RACE COMMUNICATIONS RC2052364 CITY HALL & YARD FIBER INTERNET/MAR2622179 715-1206-4201 2,040.00 Total : 2,040.0022179 111463 3/4/2026 RED SECURITY GROUP, LLC 106075-A-B-C REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED PDK KEYPADS13255 715-4204-4201 2,942.31 Total : 2,942.3113255 111464 3/4/2026 ROBERT HALF 65946891 TEMP STAFFING - CDD - ENDING 2.20.2622419 Page 59 of 1126 03/04/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 2:16:00PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111464 3/4/2026 (Continued)ROBERT HALF22419 001-4101-4112 1,357.80 TEMP STAFFING - HR - ENDING 2.20.2665948138 001-1203-4201 1,662.50 TEMP STAFFING - CCO - ENDING 2.20.2665948575 001-1121-4201 2,338.50 Total : 5,358.8022419 111465 3/4/2026 SAEMANN, ROB PO44117 TR1227 REIMB - ICA SEMINAR 7.10-1211386 001-1101-4317 176.40 Total : 176.4011386 111466 3/4/2026 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS ACCT 4251-1921-1 PAINTING SUPPLIES/JAN2617903 001-4204-4201 143.99 001-4204-4201 1,671.75 001-4204-4201 163.00 Total : 1,978.7417903 111467 3/4/2026 SLATER WATERPROOFING, INC.4799 LOT C IMPROVEMENTS/JAN2623382 122-8699-4201 12,969.40 161-8699-4201 118,560.00 190-8699-4201 154,317.62 Total : 285,847.0223382 111468 3/4/2026 SMART & FINAL ACCT 322063 REFRESHMENTS&CLEANING SUPPLIES/FEB2600114 001-1101-4305 25.61 001-1203-4201 54.71 001-2101-4306 281.04 001-3302-4201 199.09 001-4601-4308 104.93 001-4601-4328 65.57 Total : 730.9500114 111469 3/4/2026 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC COMM 04724 RADIO WORK08812 715-2101-4311 665.00 Total : 665.0008812 111470 3/4/2026 STERICYCLE 8013177923 MEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL/FEB2610412 001-2101-4201 74.90 Page 60 of 1126 03/04/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 2:16:00PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 74.90 111470 3/4/2026 STERICYCLE10412 111471 3/4/2026 TANABE, SEAN TR1276 PER DIEM-CPCA SYMPOSIUM 3.16.2619956 001-2101-4317 65.00 Total : 65.0019956 111472 3/4/2026 TATUM, CONNER PO45347 CITATION (39033086) REFUND - DUPLICATE24047 001-3302 68.00 Total : 68.0024047 111473 3/4/2026 TIBBILS, JOHN PO45348 CITATION (31045274) REFUND - DUPLICATE24044 001-3302 93.00 Total : 93.0024044 111474 3/4/2026 TORRANCE AUTO PARTS Acct 2250 AUTO REPAIR/MAINTENANCE PARTS/FEB2616735 715-2101-4311 123.89 001-2021 2.30 001-2022 -2.30 Total : 123.8916735 111475 3/4/2026 TORRES, IVAN PO45349 K9 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT23002 170-2105-5401 375.17 Total : 375.1723002 111476 3/4/2026 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC 045-553286 ERP SOFTWARE CONVERSION 2.2.2605626 715-1206-4201 1,304.00 Total : 1,304.0005626 111477 3/4/2026 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 220260346 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERTS/FEB2608207 160-3102-4201 63.75 Total : 63.7508207 111478 3/4/2026 US ARMOR 51789 BPV WITH CARRIER09374 001-2101-4314 818.00 001-2101-4314 93.75 Total : 911.7509374 111479 3/4/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73611586 VOIP PHONES/CITY HALL&PD/JAN2618666 001-1101-4304 16.34 001-1121-4304 57.18 Page 61 of 1126 03/04/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 2:16:00PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111479 3/4/2026 (Continued)VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES18666 001-1132-4304 16.34 001-1141-4304 32.67 001-1201-4304 155.19 001-1202-4304 98.02 001-1203-4304 89.85 001-1204-4304 106.18 001-1208-4304 8.17 001-2101-4304 539.09 001-4101-4304 106.18 001-4201-4304 138.86 001-4202-4304 228.71 160-3102-4201 16.34 715-1206-4304 24.49 Total : 1,633.6118666 111480 3/4/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73610937 VOIP PHONES/PW YARD/JAN2618666 001-4202-4304 151.66 Total : 151.6618666 111481 3/4/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73610551 VOIP PHONES/PARKS&REC/JAN2618666 001-4601-4304 149.16 Total : 149.1618666 111482 3/4/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73610931 VOIP PHONES/BASE 3/JAN2618666 001-3302-4304 84.65 Total : 84.6518666 111483 3/4/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73611580 VOIP PHONES/BARD/JAN2618666 001-3302-4304 65.40 Total : 65.4018666 111484 3/4/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73610943 VOIP PHONES/EOC/JAN2618666 001-1201-4304 51.17 Total : 51.1718666 111485 3/4/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73612288 VOIP PHONES/CHA/JAN2618666 001-1201-4304 15.15 Total : 15.1518666 Page 62 of 1126 03/04/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 2:16:00PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111486 3/4/2026 VERIZON WIRELESS 6136170031 PD TRUNK MODEMS/FEB2603209 153-2106-4201 1,040.26 Total : 1,040.2603209 111487 3/4/2026 WATERBURY BUTTON COMPANY INV2876 P BUTTONS24034 001-2101-4314 570.24 001-2101-4314 19.77 Total : 590.0124034 111488 3/4/2026 WCC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP 38203 SECURITY HARDWARE EQUIPMENT INSTALL23854 001-2101-4201 20,829.65 715-1206-4201 1,790.99 Total : 22,620.6423854 111489 3/4/2026 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 00237297 CDD PLAN REVIEW & SUPPORT SVS/JAN2610703 001-4201-4201 35,145.20 Total : 35,145.2010703 111490 3/4/2026 XANADU SERVICE SYSTEM, INC.11092 CITYWIDE JANITORIAL SERVICE/DEC2523801 001-4204-4201 14,617.00 CITYWIDE JANITORIAL SERVICE/JAN2611120 001-4204-4201 14,617.00 Total : 29,234.0023801 111491 3/4/2026 ZUBER, BRENT PO45361 PER DIEM - SUPERVISOR COURSE21393 001-2101-4312 150.00 Total : 150.0021393 1459550 2/25/2026 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET 110581845 VEHICLE FUEL 1/10/26-2/9/2610668 715-6101-4310 265.94 715-3104-4310 551.80 001-1250 99.47 715-4201-4310 53.80 715-4601-4310 17.90 715-3302-4310 1,959.51 715-4202-4310 303.14 715-2101-4310 3,724.34 715-4204-4310 320.58 715-4206-4310 172.64 Page 63 of 1126 03/04/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12 2:16:00PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 7,469.12 1459550 2/25/2026 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET10668 700131628 3/2/2026 BMO BANK N.A.000002134592 BOND INTEREST PYMT-GREENWICH UUAD24055 624-2252 101,535.65 Total : 101,535.6524055 Bank total : 1,503,161.37 85 Vouchers for bank code :boa 1,503,161.37Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 85 Page 64 of 1126 03/11/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 2:31:05PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111492 3/11/2026 ANTHONY'S AUTO DETAILING FEB26 CAR WASHES FOR PATROL VEHICLES/FEB2624027 715-2101-4311 465.00 Total : 465.0024027 111493 3/11/2026 AT&T 960 461-1985 555 7 PD COMPUTER CIRCUITS/MAR2600321 001-2101-4304 250.78 Total : 250.7800321 111494 3/11/2026 AT&T MOBILITY 287301168383 EOC&COMMUNICATIONS CELL PHONE/FEB2613361 001-1201-4304 101.08 Total : 101.0813361 111495 3/11/2026 ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS Req 42 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS/FEB26B23101 705-1217-4324 10,113.23 PREFUNDING - WORKERS COMP CLAIMReq 43 705-1217-4324 19,157.62 Total : 29,270.8523101 111496 3/11/2026 ATHENS SERVICES 21300278 PD SHREDDING SERVICE/MAR2616660 001-2101-4309 86.67 Total : 86.6716660 111497 3/11/2026 AXON ENTERPRISES, INC.INUS428289 ADDITIONAL PRO LICENSE21022 715-2101-4201 226.90 Total : 226.9021022 111498 3/11/2026 BADGE BEHAVIOR Y327040 CLASS TUITION(2)-ADDICTIVE PERSONALITY17428 001-2101-4313 300.00 Total : 300.0017428 111499 3/11/2026 BEAMAN, DORIS PO45383 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT REFUND24064 001-3840 608.62 Total : 608.6224064 111500 3/11/2026 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 1055029 CITY ATTNY SVS/GENERAL/FEB2620942 001-1131-4201 2,300.31 CITY ATTNY SVS/CITY COUNCIL/FEB261055030 001-1131-4201 6,942.20 CITY ATTNY SVS/CITY MANAGER/FEB261055031 Attachment 2Page 65 of 1126 03/11/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 2:31:05PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111500 3/11/2026 (Continued)BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP20942 001-1131-4201 523.50 CITY ATTNY SVS/CITY CLERK/FEB261055032 001-1131-4201 494.10 CITY ATTNY SVS/COMM DEV/FEB261055033 001-1131-4201 6,095.80 CITY ATTNY SVS/COMM RES/FEB261055034 001-1131-4201 2,210.30 CITY ATTNY SVS/PUBLIC WORKS/FEB261055035 001-1131-4201 8,439.10 CITY ATTNY SVS/POLICE SVS/FEB261055036 001-1131-4201 6,352.80 CITY ATTNY SVS/ADMIN SVS/FEB261055037 001-1131-4201 1,925.50 CITY ATTNY SVS/ICRMA V CITY HB/FEB261055038 705-1133-4201 188.40 CITY ATTNY SVS/KOERNER V CITY HB/FEB261055039 705-1133-4201 11,617.10 ATTNY SVS/KRASNEGOR V CITY HB/FEB261055040 705-1133-4201 231.10 CITY ATTNY SVS/HUMAN RESOURCES/FEB261055041 001-1203-4201 56.10 CITY ATTNY SVS/TELECOMMUNICATIONS/FEB261055042 001-1131-4201 3,937.20 ATTNY SVS/PW CONSTRUCTION/FEB261055043 001-1131-4201 1,094.40 CITY ATTNY SVS/PROP 218/FEB261055044 001-1131-4201 425.60 CITY ATTNY SVS/PRA BY ARC/FEB261055045 001-1131-4201 12,019.60 Total : 64,853.1120942 111501 3/11/2026 CA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTH 3.3.26 LIABILITY CLAIMS REIMB/FEB2608904 705-1209-4324 11,137.72 Total : 11,137.7208904 111502 3/11/2026 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS PO45366 BLDG STANDARDS ADMIN FEE 4/1/23-3/31/2415663 001-3204 1,614.00 Page 66 of 1126 03/11/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 2:31:05PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 1,614.00 111502 3/11/2026 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS15663 111503 3/11/2026 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 7631 MR#591397 NAMEPLATE/NICHOLS00262 001-4601-4201 20.85 Total : 20.8500262 111504 3/11/2026 CDWG AH8394T REPLACEMENT UPS FOR PD SERVER STACK09632 715-1206-5405 3,050.00 715-1206-5405 297.38 REPLACEMENT PRINTER FOR COMDEVAH92T2W 715-4101-5401 814.93 715-4101-5401 75.56 REPLACEMENT PRINTER FOR COMDEVAH93B5E 715-4101-5401 384.07 715-4101-5401 36.56 Total : 4,658.5009632 111505 3/11/2026 CENTERS OF CA, A MEDICAL CORP, OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH89948739 PRE-EMPLOYMENT EVALS 2.17.2623578 001-1203-4320 218.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT EVALS 2.19-20.2690023679 001-1203-4320 436.00 Total : 654.0023578 111506 3/11/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 241350501030126 HD PEG CHANNEL/MAR2620236 715-1206-4201 636.00 Total : 636.0020236 111507 3/11/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188398801022126 CITY HALL CABLE/FEB2620236 715-4204-4201 135.63 Total : 135.6320236 111508 3/11/2026 CODE 5 GROUP, LLC 4450 ANNUAL TRACKING SERVICE17333 001-2101-4201 1,800.00 Total : 1,800.0017333 111509 3/11/2026 DONNOE & ASSOCIATES, INC 11208 PO&CSO STOCK TEST RENTAL + TEST BOOKS17868 001-1203-4201 1,400.00 Total : 1,400.0017868 111510 3/11/2026 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC 71470 MR#782613 AMMUNITION12735 Page 67 of 1126 03/11/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 2:31:05PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111510 3/11/2026 (Continued)DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC12735 001-2101-4201 2,406.06 Total : 2,406.0612735 111511 3/11/2026 EMARD, CHARLIE PO45368 CITATION (40034150) REFUND - VOIDED24061 001-3302 63.00 Total : 63.0024061 111512 3/11/2026 ESCOBAR, CESAR PO45369 CITATION (38026108) REFUND - VOIDED24062 001-3302 63.00 Total : 63.0024062 111513 3/11/2026 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 109-1110167 MR#973898 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PARTS22926 715-3104-4311 218.28 MR#973890 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PARTS109-1110175 715-2101-4311 119.18 MR#973897 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PARTS109-1110336 715-2101-4311 139.63 MR#973899 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PARTS109-1111148 715-2101-4311 23.47 Total : 500.5622926 111514 3/11/2026 FEDEX OFFICE 101600023490 MR#435419 PRINTING SVS-P&R CARDS06293 001-4601-4305 104.12 MR#973911 PRINTING SVS-CERTIFICATES101600112127 001-1101-4305 1.59 MR#973911 PRINTING SVS-CERTIFICATES101600120283 001-1101-4305 19.07 MR#435421 PRINTING SVS/STAFFORD101600144040 001-4202-4305 62.02 Total : 186.8006293 111515 3/11/2026 FEHR & PEERS 188848 WAYFINDING SIGNAGE DESIGN SVS21539 301-8111-4201 8,800.00 Total : 8,800.0021539 111516 3/11/2026 FOSTER & FOSTER, INC.39337 24/25 GASB REPORT PREP22689 001-1202-4201 3,000.00 Total : 3,000.0022689 Page 68 of 1126 03/11/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 2:31:05PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111517 3/11/2026 FRONTIER 310-318-0113-1203155 EOC ANALOG LINES/MAR2619884 715-1206-4304 1,573.73 Total : 1,573.7319884 111518 3/11/2026 FRONTIER 310-318-9210-0827185 PD JAIL BREATHALYZER/MAR2619884 001-2101-4304 120.94 Total : 120.9419884 111519 3/11/2026 FRONTIER 310-318-8751-0128095 CASHIER TAP LINE/MAR2619884 001-1204-4304 76.99 Total : 76.9919884 111520 3/11/2026 GALL, TINA KATCHEN 023-022026 CDBG ADMIN&LABOR COMPLIANCE/FEB2622871 001-4202-4201 2,047.50 Total : 2,047.5022871 111521 3/11/2026 GRAINGER 9830053311 MAT REQ 473261/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES10836 001-4204-4309 108.69 MAT REQ 473264/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES9836970567 160-3102-4201 509.53 Total : 618.2210836 111522 3/11/2026 GROH, MARK LEE HB-065 CITATION HEARING EXAMINER SVS/FEB2621597 001-1204-4201 364.00 Total : 364.0021597 111523 3/11/2026 HENNESSEY, LESHA PO45370 CITATION (44024012) REFUND - VOIDED24058 001-3302 48.00 Total : 48.0024058 111524 3/11/2026 HURLEY, BENJAMIN PO45372 CITATION (43032704) REFUND - VOIDED24059 001-3302 48.00 Total : 48.0024059 111525 3/11/2026 IPS GROUP INC INV121842 REPLACEMENT METER PARTS19314 001-3302-4201 8,500.00 001-3302-4201 1,005.75 Total : 9,505.7519314 111526 3/11/2026 JILK HEAVY CONSTRUCTION, INC.25A-1013 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT WATER TRAP INSTALL22913 Page 69 of 1126 03/11/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 2:31:05PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111526 3/11/2026 (Continued)JILK HEAVY CONSTRUCTION, INC.22913 301-8623-4201 15,216.41 Total : 15,216.4122913 111527 3/11/2026 MARTIN CHEVROLET 707249 MR#973889 FLEET MAINT PARTS15912 715-2101-4311 71.12 Total : 71.1215912 111528 3/11/2026 NETRIX LLC CI-027424 IT SUPPORT SERVICES/MAR2611539 715-1206-4201 30,558.88 MANAGED CYBERSECURITY SVS/MAR26CI-027427 715-1206-4201 5,075.00 Total : 35,633.8811539 111529 3/11/2026 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 457146072001 MAT REQ 782611/OFFICE SUPPLIES13114 001-2101-4305 47.18 MAT REQ 782611/OFFICE SUPPLIES457163221001 001-2101-4305 59.78 MAT REQ 782611/OFFICE SUPPLIES457163234001 001-2101-4305 1.48 MAT REQ 519661/OFFICE SUPPLIES459594534001 001-4201-4305 76.81 MAT REQ 519660/OFFICE SUPPLIES460730443001 001-4201-4305 33.22 MAT REQ 782610/OFFICE SUPPLIES460792805001 001-2101-4305 70.56 MAT REQ 782610/OFFICE SUPPLIES460810266001 001-2101-4305 36.21 Total : 325.2413114 111530 3/11/2026 PARADISE AWARDS 42917R SWOF PLATE08878 001-4601-4308 185.00 001-4601-4308 19.43 Total : 204.4308878 111531 3/11/2026 PARKMOBILE, LLC US032-2026-000435 PAY-BY-APP PARKING FEES/FEB2623018 001-3304-4201 802.35 001-3305-4201 1,495.26 001-3302-4201 2,886.14 Page 70 of 1126 03/11/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 2:31:05PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 5,183.75 111531 3/11/2026 PARKMOBILE, LLC23018 111532 3/11/2026 PARS 59949 ALT RETIREMENT PLAN ADMIN FEES/JAN2614693 001-2101-4185 15.19 001-4201-4185 148.14 001-4202-4185 26.60 Total : 189.9314693 111533 3/11/2026 PLATA, YUNUEN TR1260 PER DIEM - KEYS TO INMATE MGMT18411 001-2101-4313 150.00 Total : 150.0018411 111534 3/11/2026 RAMIREZ, MARTHA PO45363 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT23654 001-2101-4313 39.15 Total : 39.1523654 111535 3/11/2026 RED SECURITY GROUP, LLC 106554 MR#898299 LOCKSMITH SUPPLIES13255 001-4204-4309 245.44 Total : 245.4413255 111536 3/11/2026 RJ PRINTING & PROMOTIONAL 1351 TOW AWAY/NO PARKING SIGNS21153 001-4601-4308 370.00 001-4601-4308 75.58 Total : 445.5821153 111537 3/11/2026 ROBERT HALF 65959738 TEMP STAFFING - CDD - ENDING 2.27.2622419 001-4101-4112 1,810.40 TEMP STAFFING - CCO - ENDING 2.27.2665963243 001-1121-4201 3,118.00 TEMP STAFFING - HR - ENDING 2.27.2665971283 001-1203-4201 1,662.50 Total : 6,590.9022419 111538 3/11/2026 RP FINISHING POWDER COATING IN 10 POWDER COAT TRUCK RACK23720 715-4206-4201 500.00 Total : 500.0023720 111539 3/11/2026 SAFEWAY INC VONS Acct 150882 REFRESHMENTS&CLEANING SUPPLIES/FEB2616425 001-4601-4308 44.07 Page 71 of 1126 03/11/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 2:31:05PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 44.07 111539 3/11/2026 SAFEWAY INC VONS16425 111540 3/11/2026 SBCU VISA PO45359 J SANCLEMENTE CC STATEMENT - FEB2603353 001-4202-4317 105.24 001-4202-4305 298.34 E CAHALAN CC STATEMENT - FEB26PO45364 001-2101-4306 317.17 001-3302-4201 1,048.79 001-2101-4305 305.55 715-2101-4311 197.54 001-2101-4305 21.50 J CORDOVA CC STATEMENT - FEB26PO45375 715-2101-4311 -1,387.49 001-6101-4201 99.10 001-6101-4309 125.43 715-4206-4309 679.51 161-3109-4309 2,439.82 001-4202-4305 441.94 001-3104-4309 144.98 001-4202-4317 285.00 301-8109-4201 6,109.54 001-4204-4309 517.75 001-3104-4201 48.51 M MARAVILLA CC STATEMENT - FEB26PO45376 001-1121-4305 199.27 001-1121-4201 565.00 L PHILLIPS CC STATEMENT - FEB26PO45389 715-2101-4311 13.57 001-2101-4305 78.94 715-2101-4311 9.80 001-2101-4317 273.37 001-2101-4305 807.05 001-3302-4201 2,900.03 001-2101-4317 270.37 001-2101-4315 150.00 001-3302-4201 88.20 001-2101-4201 55.00 B WALKER CC STATEMENT - FEB26PO45390 001-1202-4315 120.00 Page 72 of 1126 03/11/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 2:31:05PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111540 3/11/2026 (Continued)SBCU VISA03353 001-1203-4305 379.11 001-1203-4201 970.77 Total : 18,678.7003353 111541 3/11/2026 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS ACCT 4251-1921-1 PAINTING SUPPLIES/FEB2617903 001-4204-4201 66.51 001-4204-4309 234.08 001-6101-4201 1,207.10 Total : 1,507.6917903 111542 3/11/2026 SMITH, MIRIAM PO45385 CASH KEY REFUND24056 001-2117 16.50 001-3851 5.00 Total : 21.5024056 111543 3/11/2026 SOCAL GAS 170-781-3287 9 YARD CNG STATION/FEB2600170 715-3104-4310 96.03 715-4204-4310 96.03 715-6101-4310 96.03 Total : 288.0900170 111544 3/11/2026 SOURCE GRAPHICS INC SG256865 PW PLOTTER SUPPORT AGREEMENT13761 715-1206-4201 1,694.14 LARGE FORMAT SCANNER SUPPORT AGREEMENTSG256868 715-1206-4201 1,951.85 Total : 3,645.9913761 111545 3/11/2026 SOUTH BAY POLICE&FIRE MEMORIAL 2601 MOV AWARDS LUNCHEON TABLE FOR 1022604 001-2101-4317 700.00 Total : 700.0022604 111546 3/11/2026 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC COMM 04725 MAINTENANCE PARTS FOR HB708812 715-2101-4311 804.30 715-2101-4311 84.45 Total : 888.7508812 111547 3/11/2026 SPECIALIZED ELEVATOR SERVICES 94895 PARKING STRUCT ELEVATOR MAINT/MAR2621538 001-3304-4201 230.84 CITY HALL ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE/MAR2694896 Page 73 of 1126 03/11/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 2:31:05PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111547 3/11/2026 (Continued)SPECIALIZED ELEVATOR SERVICES21538 001-4204-4201 222.62 Total : 453.4621538 111548 3/11/2026 SRK PROMOTIONAL ADVERTISING 5419 TABLECOVER WITH PD PATCH15398 001-2101-4305 210.00 001-2101-4305 44.95 Total : 254.9515398 111549 3/11/2026 SUNG, CHANGYUI PO45378 CITATION (35035407) REFUND - VOIDED24063 001-3302 63.00 Total : 63.0024063 111550 3/11/2026 TIREHUB LLC 57104352 MR#973896 VEHICLE TIRES21146 715-3302-4311 523.84 Total : 523.8421146 111551 3/11/2026 T-MOBILE ACCT 954297746 PW YARD CELL PHONES/HOT SPOTS/FEB2619082 001-4202-4304 696.78 Total : 696.7819082 111552 3/11/2026 T-MOBILE ACCT 267037374 PARKS&REC CELL PHONES/FEB2619082 001-4601-4304 49.62 Total : 49.6219082 111553 3/11/2026 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC 045-553883 ERP SOFTWARE CONVERSION 2.9-12.2605626 715-1206-4201 5,216.00 Total : 5,216.0005626 111554 3/11/2026 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE, INC.33662 MONTHLY PRINTER MAINTENANCE/FEB2604768 715-1206-4201 378.30 MONTHLY PRINTER MAINT/MAR2633683 715-1206-4201 378.30 Total : 756.6004768 111555 3/11/2026 US BANK 3178472 INTEREST PAYMENT ON OIL SETTLEMENT BONDS19648 201-1220-6701 119,178.39 Total : 119,178.3919648 111556 3/11/2026 VRC COMPANIES, LLC 5312152 LASERFICHE ANNUAL SUPPORT22955 Page 74 of 1126 03/11/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 2:31:05PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111556 3/11/2026 (Continued)VRC COMPANIES, LLC22955 715-1206-4201 24,670.69 Total : 24,670.6922955 111557 3/11/2026 WALKER, BRANDON PO45392 MILEAGE - CSMFO ANNUAL CONF 2.25.2624065 001-1202-4317 155.15 Total : 155.1524065 111558 3/11/2026 WESTERN AUDIO VISUAL 23698 CABLECAST GOLD SUPPORT RENEWAL22022 715-1206-4201 678.86 Total : 678.8622022 Bank total : 390,910.22 67 Vouchers for bank code :boa 390,910.22Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 67 Page 75 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-AS-022 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CITY TREASURER’S REPORT (City Treasurer Dave Pedersen) Recommended Action: The City Treasurer recommends City Council receive and file the February 2026 City Treasurer’s Report. Executive Summary: Investments in the reports meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach’s adopted investment policy. Attached are reports of all inactive Public Deposits for the month of February 2026. This is the most current investment information available. Attachments: February 2026 City Treasurer’s Report Respectfully Submitted by: David Pedersen, City Treasurer Concur: Anna Bailey, Accountant Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Concur: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 76 of 1126 INSTITUTIONS RATE YIELD DATE OF DATE OF ORIGINAL MARKET COST/MARKET FACE/PAR OF TO INVESTMENT TYPE/INSTITUTION CUSIP #BOOK VALUE INVESTMENT MATURITY COST VALUE DIFFERENCE VALUE INTEREST MATURITY POOLED INVESTMENTS LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund)37,474,082.56$ 37,474,082.56$ $37,555,831.63 1 $81,749.07 37,474,082.56$ 4.200% LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund - Greenwich Village Underground)3,820,943.95$ 3,763,000.00$ $3,829,279.27 1 $66,279.27 3,820,943.95$ 4.200% LACPIF (Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Funds)2,221,322.81$ 2,221,322.81$ $2,174,947.38 2 ($46,375.43)2,221,322.81$ 3.170%3 Pooled Investments % of Total Investment 78.916%$43,516,349.32 43,458,405.37$ $43,560,058.29 $101,652.92 $43,516,349.32 U.S. GOV'T AGENCY BONDS/NOTES US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CCF6 $499,906.54 6/9/2021 5/31/2026 $498,145.00 $496,360.00 ($1,785.00)$500,000.00 0.750%0.826% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CCP4 $249,949.65 8/11/2021 7/31/2026 $248,115.46 $246,920.00 ($1,195.46)$250,000.00 0.625%0.780% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CBT7 $500,015.25 9/30/2021 3/31/2026 $500,878.91 $498,820.00 ($2,058.91)$500,000.00 0.750%0.710% US Treasury Note/Bond 912828Z78 $499,764.27 1/26/2022 1/31/2027 $498,692.19 $490,860.00 ($7,832.19)$500,000.00 1.500%1.555% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CAL5 $472,578.23 10/31/2022 9/30/2027 $415,109.37 $476,875.00 $61,765.63 $500,000.00 0.375%4.237% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CEB3 $467,851.20 2/29/2024 2/28/2029 $445,812.50 $478,535.00 $32,722.50 $500,000.00 1.875%4.307% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CFL0 $498,931.60 10/22/2024 9/30/2029 $498,527.34 $507,305.00 $8,777.66 $500,000.00 3.875%3.941% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CFT3 $497,686.58 10/31/2024 10/31/2029 $496,828.13 $509,570.00 $12,741.87 $500,000.00 4.000%4.142% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CMD0 $250,315.86 1/29/2025 12/31/2029 $250,406.25 $258,242.50 $7,836.25 $250,000.00 4.375%4.337% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CMU2 $502,221.13 4/21/2025 3/31/2030 $502,687.50 $510,060.00 $7,372.50 $500,000.00 4.000%3.879% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CHF1 $247,589.20 6/18/2025 5/31/2030 $247,193.36 $252,657.50 $5,464.14 $250,000.00 3.750%4.002% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CHZ7 $522,552.66 10/22/2025 9/30/2030 $524,289.00 $523,615.00 ($674.00)$500,000.00 4.625%3.544% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CJX0 $506,651.80 2/12/2026 1/31/2031 $506,711.00 $510,605.00 $3,894.00 $500,000.00 4.000%3.701% U.S. Gov't Agency Bonds/Notes 10.366%$5,716,013.97 $5,633,396.01 $5,760,425.00 $127,028.99 $5,750,000.00 NEGOTIABLE CDS Medallion Bank Utah 58404DLL3 $249,000.00 08/30/2021 08/31/2026 $249,000.00 $245,326.73 ($3,673.27)$249,000.00 0.850%0.850% Synchrony Bank 87165FE42 $249,000.00 11/12/2021 11/12/2026 $249,000.00 $244,369.13 ($4,630.87)$249,000.00 1.100%1.100% Toyota Financial Savings 89235MMB4 $249,000.00 11/12/2021 11/12/2026 $249,000.00 $244,369.13 ($4,630.87)$249,000.00 1.100%1.100% Capital One BK USA Natl Ass 14042TGL52 $246,000.00 6/8/2022 6/2/2027 $246,000.00 $244,058.10 ($1,941.90)$246,000.00 3.199%3.199% Capital One Natl Assn MCLEA 14042RRS21 $246,000.00 6/8/2022 6/2/2027 $246,000.00 $244,058.10 ($1,941.90)$246,000.00 3.199%3.199% Third FS & LA Cleveland 88413QDN5 $245,000.00 8/23/2022 8/19/2027 $245,000.00 $243,008.84 ($1,991.16)$245,000.00 3.299%3.299% Discover Bank/ Capital One Natl Assn 254673Q90 $245,000.00 8/23/2022 8/23/2027 $245,000.00 $243,348.04 ($1,651.96)$245,000.00 3.400%3.400% First National Bank 32114VCF2 $249,000.00 2/10/2023 2/10/2028 $249,000.00 $248,213.83 ($786.17)$249,000.00 3.700%3.700% First Business Bank 31938QW42 $245,000.00 2/15/2023 2/15/2028 $245,000.00 $244,374.61 ($625.39)$245,000.00 3.750%3.750% Customers Bank 23204HPB8 $244,000.00 6/14/2023 6/14/2028 $244,000.00 $247,247.84 $3,247.84 $244,000.00 4.450%4.450% Morgan Stanley Private Bank 61690U7S3 $244,000.00 6/14/2023 6/14/2028 $244,000.00 $251,087.98 $7,087.98 $244,000.00 4.500%4.500% Park State Bank 70086VAY7 $249,000.00 8/9/2023 8/17/2028 $249,000.00 $255,685.05 $6,685.05 $249,000.00 4.400%4.400% United Fidelity Bank 910286GUI $249,000.00 8/9/2023 8/17/2028 $249,000.00 $252,664.51 $3,664.51 $249,000.00 4.500%4.500% Northpoint Bank 666613MK7 $248,000.00 10/20/2023 10/20/2028 $248,000.00 $254,105.26 $6,105.26 $248,000.00 4.850%4.850% Southern First Bank 7954504W2 $244,000.00 10/17/2023 10/27/2028 $244,000.00 $250,388.31 $6,388.31 $244,000.00 4.850%4.850% UBS BK USA 90355GHQ2 $248,000.00 11/9/2023 11/8/2028 $248,000.00 $255,205.39 $7,205.39 $248,000.00 5.000%5.000% First State Bank 3365IMAL8 $248,000.00 11/16/2023 11/16/2028 $248,000.00 $254,617.43 $6,617.43 $248,000.00 4.900%4.900% Morgan Stanley 61768E5C3 $244,000.00 6/12/2024 6/12/2029 $244,000.00 $249,848.41 $5,848.41 $244,000.00 4.700%4.700% BNY Mellon 05584CPN0 $244,000.00 6/12/2024 6/12/2029 $244,000.00 $248,217.78 $4,217.78 $244,000.00 4.450%4.450% State Bk India 856288CM5 $245,000.00 8/26/2025 8/21/2030 $245,000.00 $245,089.89 $89.89 $245,000.00 4.000%4.000% Goldman Sachs 38150V6U8 $245,000.00 9/23/2025 9/23/2030 $245,000.00 $241,083.31 ($3,916.69)$245,000.00 3.600%3.600% Sallie Mae Bank 795451EE90 $245,000.00 12/10/2025 12/10/2030 $245,000.00 $244,086.10 ($913.90)$245,000.00 3.900%3.900% Versabank USA 92512KBF93 $245,000.00 12/17/2025 12/17/2030 $245,000.00 $243,019.13 ($1,980.87)$245,000.00 3.800%3.800% BMW Bk North 05612LJH69 $245,000.00 1/30/2026 1/30/2029 $245,000.00 $243,748.34 ($1,251.66)$245,000.00 3.700%3.700% Negotiable CD % of Total Investment 10.718%$5,910,000.00 $5,910,000.00 $5,937,221.24 $27,221.24 $5,910,000.00 TOTAL ALL INVESTMENTS 55,142,363.29$ 55,001,801.38$ $55,257,704.53 $255,903.15 55,176,349.32$ NET TOTAL OF ALL INVESTMENTS LESS BONDS FUNDS HELD 51,321,419.34$ 51,238,801.38$ $51,428,425.25 $189,623.87 51,355,405.37$ Average Rate of Interest 3.382% Average Yield to Maturity 3.491% 1 Rate publishes quarterly. 2 February rate publishes the first week of April. 3 February rate publishes the last week of March. In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, the Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby certifies that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months. APPROVED: DAVID PEDERSEN, CITY TREASURER TREASURER'S REPORT FEBRUARY 2026 Page 77 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PW-015 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF MARCH 12, 2026 (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of March 12, 2026 (Attachment 1). Number of Projects by Phase # of Projects Study/Conceptual Planning 11 Preliminary Design 3 Final Engineering Design 6 Project Approvals/ Bidding 0 Construction 7 Closeout 2 Completed 7 Total Projects 36 Number of Projects by Completion Timeline # of Projects Completed in FY 25–26 11 Completed after FY 25–26 22 TBD 3 Total Projects 36 Number of Projects by Category # of Projects Street & Highway Improvements 13 Sewer & Storm Drain Improvements 4 Park Improvements 3 Public Building & Ground Improvements 16 Total Projects 36 Page 78 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 2 Number of Projects by Manager # of Projects Joe SanClemente 2 John Oskoui 4 Saad Malim 0 Heecheol Kwon 2 Brandon Araujo 3 Andrew Nguyen 5 Kristian Alarcon 1 Briana Aube 1 Karla Vargas 2 Magvern By 3 TBD 6 Complete 7 Total Projects 36 Attachment: 1. Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of March 12, 2026 2. Estimated CIP Project Schedule FY 2025-2026 – Updated March 12, 2026 Respectfully Submitted by: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 79 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 3-12-2026 UPDATED FY 2025-26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Light Blue indicates project milestone updates. ADA ComponentCIP No.Project Name Project CategoryProject Budget1 Project Manager Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutProject Initiation Date Estimated Project Completion Date2 Current Project Status Project Description X 106 Annual Street Improvements (New)SH $3,625,257.00 Heecheol Kwon X 08/25 09/27 In May 2025, staff applied a construction grant for $2,560,000 in funding from Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) STBG/CMAQ grant program. The project was not selected for award, but remains on SCAG's contigency list. Field pavement core sample was finalized on Jan. 7, 2026 and the report is currently in progess. The project design is 50% complete, and topographic survey work was completed in October 30, 2025 and being incorporatated in the overall design. Project is now being combined with CIP 115 - City Sidewalk Improvements. This project provides for pavement rehabilitation of various streets throughout the city. The project will also repair/replace deteriorated portions of sidewalk, curb and gutter, and curb ramps. This work will be performed following the sewer and storm drain repairs identified in the Sewer and Drainage Master Plans. 107 Annual Slurry Seal (New)SH $450,000.00 Magvern By X 07/25 10/26 Staff has prepared final construction design plans and specifications which are under review. Plans anticipated to be bid in March 2026.This project includes slurry seal of various roadways throughout the city to preserve pavement conditions and to extend its service life. 111 Gateway and Wayfinding Signs Conceptual Design SH $75,000.00 Joe SanClemente X 07/22 05/27 The City has received a donation of $500,000 from former Mayor Chuck Sheldon and his wife Missy to fund the design, installation, construction, and maintenance of new monument signage within the City. The primary use of the funds will be for a new digital monument sign at the Community Center near Pier Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway; any remaining funds may be directed toward additional gateway monument signs at other locations in the City. The City previously received a $50,000 contribution for the electronic sign from the Chamber of Commerce in 2014. Staff is exploring the potential for the funds to be reallocated to the remaining unfunded elements in the project including the downtown wayfinding signage and the gateway signage. Staff is preparing preliminary designs, and further evaluating permitting requirements, and anticipates bringing an item to City Council in early to mid 2026. Electronic sign will require Caltrans and Planning Commission approvals. The schedule has been revised to reflect the addtion of design, permitting, and construction phases, which are estimated at this time and subject to change based on peritting requirements. This project will evaluate gateway signage, downtown wayfinding and a marquee at the Community Center. Recommendations will include potential locations, preliminary design, and order of magnitude cost estimates for final design, sign fabrication, and installation which will require additional funding. 113 City Wide Multi-Space Meters Deployment SH $415,000.00 Andrew Nguyen X 07/23 03/27 Staff is preparing plans for multi space meter installations along Pier Ave and in Lot D.This project will include the installation of additional signage for the Pay-By-App parking system for on-street parking spaces and replacement of single space meters with multi-space meter equipment. This CIP will include the first phase of deployment which may include Pier Avenue and parking Lot D. This effort will involve purchase of equipment, development of signage layout plans (as meters and signage would need to be removed and placed with new signage), and installation. 114 Greenwich Village North Undergrounding District SH $4,031,600.00 Brandon Araujo X 07/25 10/27 City Council awarded the contract at the July 22, 2025 meeting. The City obtained the bond proceeds to fund the project on August 14, 2025. Construction contract executed on August 16, 2025. Pre-construction meeting with the contractor held in mid-September 2025. Execution of agreements with SCE and Frontier completed in October 2025. Exploratory utility activities began in February 2026. Groundbreaking for the project was February 25, 2026. Construction started March 2026. This project will consist of the undergrounding of the existing overhead utility lines within the Greenwich Village North Underground Utilities Assessment District. X 115 Citywide Sidewalk Improvements (New)SH $607,211.00 Karla Vargas X 02/27 09/27 Project is being combined with CIP 106 Annual Street Improvements.This project includes the design and construction of priority sidewalk and pedestrian safety improvements citywide. 164 Hermosa Avenue Green Street SH $368,286.00 Briana Aube X 02/18 08/26 The City of Torrance is the lead agency for the project and awarded a construction contract to Excel Paving Inc. in May 2025. A preconstruction meeting was held on Dec. 16 , 2025 for construction in Hermosa Beach. Construction started in City of Torrance portion of the project in July 2025. Construction in Hermosa Beach began on February 2nd, 2026 and is estimated to be complete May 2026. This project will install permeable gutters to increase stormwater infiltration on Hermosa Avenue, Beach Drive, Herondo Street, 6th Street, 2nd Street, 1st Street, and adjacent streets. This project is part of a multi-city green street project led by the City of Torrance and funded by Measure W. 421 Annual Sewer Improvements - Phase 2 SD $3,865,610.00 Andrew Nguyen X 11/19 04/26 Project is complete with closeout in progress. Anticipated completion date has been pushed back due to a number of delays: redesign on Loma Dr, soil conditions and utility conflicts that necessitate extensive handdigging, undisclosed concrete encasements that impeded timely sewer removal and replacement, an emergency sewer collapse on 11th Street in mid-April, the discovery of over a dozen laterals on 11th Street between Prospect Avenue and Harper Avenue that were not shown on the Plans that needed to be reconnected to the new sewer main, a residential emergency backup on 17th Street that was tangentially related to our project, and additional paving has been added to the project. Contract awarded on July 9, 2024. Construction Agreement was fully executed on August 15, 2024. Construction started September 16, 2024. Phase 1 of this project, which included lining, was completed. Phase 2 of this project includes design and construction of sewer improvements and repairs based on the Sewer Master Plan. Improvements will include approximately 128 sewer pipe point repairs, approximately 7,315 linear feet of CIPP sewer lining rehabilitation, approximately 1725 linear feet of sewer pipe removal and replacement, and approximately 16 maintenance access hole rehabilitations. Sewer repairs will take place at various locations throughout the city as part of this project. ACTIVE PROJECTS 1 of 5 Page 80 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 3-12-2026 UPDATED FY 2025-26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Light Blue indicates project milestone updates. ADA ComponentCIP No.Project Name Project CategoryProject Budget1 Project Manager Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutProject Initiation Date Estimated Project Completion Date2 Current Project Status Project Description 438 Stormwater Dry Wells Assessment SD $175,000.00 Heecheol Kwon X 10/23 TBD Staff met with the EWMP consultant, Geosyntec, on August 18, 2025 to discuss the number of drywells and alternative locations, design concept and funding application options. Staff is evaluating options to advance and enhanced feasibility study. Staff assessed the option of collaborating with the City of Redondo Beach on seeking outside funding to advance the design and construction. Measure W committee will soon begin accepting new funding applications. The City is tentatively planning to submit the funding application in June 2026. Staff met with the City of Redondo Beach to discuss an additional feasibility study to be performed by Geosyntec for alternate BMP system locations. Council awarded a contract to Geosyntec at its March 10, 2026 meeting to perform this work. As required by the region’s Enhanced Watershed Management Plan (EWMP), this project will assess the implementation of a series of drywells east of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) between 1st Street and 10th Street to capture storm water and dry weather flows within 118 acres of the Herondo Drain (SMB-6-1) watershed. 504 Playground Equipment Replacement Project (New)PK $450,000.00 John Oskoui X 07/25 11/26 The purchase of playground equipment through a cooperative purchase agreement was approved at the November 17, 2025 City Council Meeting. Playground equipment has been procured and staff is preparing a package for advertisement to retain a qualified contractor for installation. Staff anticpates advertising the project for construction in March/April. This project will provide playground enhancements in three City Parks. Work will include a full replacement of the two-to-five- year old play structure with a new unit that has integrated shade and a new rubberized mat at Valley Park. Repairs will also be made to the existing 5 to 12 year old structure and incorporate an integrated shade sail. Seaview Park will receive a full replacement of the existing play structure with a new unit with an integrated shade sail and rubberized mat. South Park will receive a replacement rubberized mat at center playfield area. 603 South Park Slope, Irrigation, and Landscape Improvements PK $1,400,141.00 Magvern By X 07/21 03/26 Project has been completed and Notice of completion has been filed and recorded November 7, 2025. Project closeout in process. Staff secured $189,849 of supplemental funding from California State Parks. Staff also secured $96,242 from the West Basin Turf Removal Grant program. Staff is working on obtaining Grant reiumbursement. Inspection with West Basin will be on January 28, 2026. Bid package advertised for construction November 21, 2024. Bids opened January 23, 2025. Construction contract awarded by Council on February 25, 2025. NTP and start of construction was April 14, 2025. This project will address repairs needed throughout the north side of the park including installing a new irrigation system and landscaping including on the sloped areas. X 615 New Corporate Yard Facilities 3 PB $1,000,000.00 Joe SanClemente X 07/15 04/29 At the May 13, 2025 CIP Study Session, Council directed staff to hold a joint study session with PW Commission to discuss desired project delivery method (i.e., design build vs design-bid-build). Project delivery method options were presented to PW Commission on July 16, 2025. On September 9, 2025 Council directed staff to proceed with advertising for an Owner Representative (OR) through an RFQ, hiring an architect to determine project programming needs, and move forward with updated environmental assessments. The RFQ for the OR was advertised on September 10, 2025, Statement of Qualifications received on October 9, 2025, consultant interviews for top ranked firms were conducted in November. Council awarded a professional services agreement contract to Cumming Group for OR services at its January 13, 2026 meeting. Staff held a project kick-off meeting with Cumming Group on January 27, 2026 and issued an RFP for CEQA and envirnmental services on 2/19/26; proposals are due on 3/16/26. Staff completed two rounds of interviews with on-call architects to consider poject programming assistance through existnig on-call contracts. Staff is finalizing that process and anticates issuing a notice to proceed before the end of March. Current project funding for design only; construction funding will need to be identified. This project is for the design and construction of a new City Yard. The current City Yard is in need of reconstruction. A new City Yard will provide a safe and functional area for City maintenance crews and staging. X 619 Kelly Courts Improvements PB $1,161,681.00 Kristian Alarcon X 07/22 07/26 Bids opened on August 28, 2025 and construction contract was awarded to All American Construction Solutions at the September 30, 2025 City Council Meeting. Contract executed November 4, 2025. Pre-construction meeting occured October 29, 2025 with NTP issued and construction started on November 17, 2025. Site demolition work has been completed. Installation of ADA ramp entrance to pickleball courts and installation of Musco light poles and luminaires for the tennis and pickleball courts is complete. Installation of new fencing is underway. Installation of court sports equipment and basketball courts resurfacing and striping is underway. Design modifications to account for unforeseen conditions have delayed the project and require additional contingency which were taken to Council at the January 27, 2026 meeting. Anticipated completion in April 2026. This project will resurface and reconfigure the Kelly Courts at Clark Field and restore all four pickleball courts. The courts will be restriped and reconfigured and the lights and fencing relocated and updated to meet current design standards. 623 Pier Structural Inspection, Evaluation, and Repairs PB $3,717,137.00 John Oskoui X 07/24 08/27 Notice to Proceed was issued on August 12, 2025 for an on-call structural engineer to prepare design plans, specifications and estimates and obtain necessary permits for the high priority repairs. 75% design package is currently under review by staff. Army Corp and Water Board have confirmed that the project will be exempt from requiring a permit. Coastal Commission review is still underway and staff is working to respond to a request for additional studies by Coastal Commission, which require services of a biologist. The City's biologist is scheduled to peform a an Eelgrass Survey and Aquatic Habitat Assessment in mid-March. Staff was notified by the LA County Parks Regional Park and Open Space District that the City was not selected for the Measure A Grant Program due to a highly competitive pool of application this cycle. Staff has completed the cost-benefit analysis and anticipates bringing an item to the City Council on March 24. An emergency partial inspection and evaluation was performed in coordination with CIP 629 and CIP 660, the results of which identified high priority repairs which were completed through CIP 629. Following completion of construction of CIP 629 and CIP 660, a full above and below water structural inspection of the pier is required to meet requirements for marine structures. Based on this inspection, it is anticipated that additional pier structural repairs will be required primarily on the pier deck. This project will also include design and permitting. Construction funding will be identified as part of a future CIP. X 626 CDBG Sidewalk Improvements (New)SH $184,000.00 Magvern By X 07/25 08/26 Bid package advertised for construction January 22, 2026. Bids opened on February 12, 2026. Contractor was selected following bid review in progress with anticipated award in March 2026 and start of construction in April 2026. This project provides improvements to sidewalks and curb ramps on Monterey Boulevard in order to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meet the latest Federal Standards. 2 of 5 Page 81 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 3-12-2026 UPDATED FY 2025-26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Light Blue indicates project milestone updates. ADA ComponentCIP No.Project Name Project CategoryProject Budget1 Project Manager Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutProject Initiation Date Estimated Project Completion Date2 Current Project Status Project Description 630 Community Center Gas Repairs PB $350,000.00 John Oskoui X 03/25 06/26 Bid package advertised for construction on July 7, 2025. Bids opened on August 12, 2025 and Council awarded contract at the September 9, 2025 City Council Meeting. Pre-construction meeting conducted on October, 8, 2026. NTP issued and construction started October, 27, 2025. Project is nearing completion as the contractor provides final roof penetrations and connections. There was a slight delay with abatement work required for ceiling penetrations to run new gas lines in the both the north and south wings of the Community Center. Council approved an increase in the project contigency on March 10, 2026 to cover unforseen conditons; change orders are now in process. Coordination with SCG to approve and energize the system has been initaited and final connection and pressure testing is scheduled to be completed by the end of March. Anticipated completion of the project by the end of April 2026. The project includes the design and installation of a new natural gas service connection to the Community Center. Staff identified leaks in the existing gas service which needed to be shut off to ensure safety and can not be easily repaired. The project will restore service. 635 Community Center Windows (New)PB $300,000.00 John Oskoui X 07/25 10/27 City's consultant, Westgroupdesigns, completed a draft preliminary needs assessment study for the windows and is preparing draft project plans. This project will evaluate windows replacement for the entire facility to address deferred maintenance needs. The existing windows present safety and security concerns due to poor conditions. This project is currently funded for design and permitting only; additional funding will be required for installation once costs are further defined. 685 Real Time Crime Center PB $860,542.98 Brandon Araujo X 07/24 06/27 The project is funded through a federal grant. The grant agreement has been fully executed, with project completion required by March 31, 2026. PW is working closely with PD and City Manager's office on advancing the project. . Staff is also working to advance other critical elements of the project including additional security cameras and the overall software integration that will be the main component of bringing all our existing programs and hardware together with new technology. Staff received sole-source approval to procure the services of Am-Tec security and City Council awarded a construction agreement to them at its October 28, 2025 meeting. Contract has been executed and the City is currently reviewing Am-Tec's submittals. Materials used on the project are subject to Buy America Preference as specified in the grant agreement and the City is working with the COPS office to obtain Buy America waivers for these materials. Staff is also seeking an extension of the grant with the COPS office. The project is facing delays due to the recent government shutdown which cotinues to delay the processing of the grant extension and assistance with the waivers. This project is to create a Real Time Crime Center (RTCC) for the City of Hermosa Beach. A RTCC is a technology-driven support center which uses state of the art technology to provide real time information to officers and detectives working in the field and investigating crimes that are reported. X 699 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements PB $2,839,940.00 Karla Vargas X 07/19 06/26 The project is advancing on two separate tracks: the elevator modernization and the structural repairs. Elevator abatementment work including drywall repairs is complete. Bids for construction of the elevator modernization were received on Dec 5, 2024, Notice to Proceed issued for February 17, 2025, following completion of abatement work. Construction started on July 14, 2025 and completed Dec 24, 2025. The main CPU board and high voltage interface board were found to be defective resulting in delays with troubleshooting existing equipment and procuring and installation of new equipment. Bid package for structural and electrical improvements for the parking structure was advertised for construction Jan 9, 2025. Bid opening was Feb 19, 2025 and the construction contract awarded by City Council on May 13, 2025. Contract executed July 9, 2025 with NTP issed for construction starting Oct 6, 2025. Anticipated completion of construction in March 2026. During the first week of constuction, as part of concrete spawl repairs on the top deck, multiple compromised post tension (PT) tendons were encountered during demolition. The City’s structural engineers completed a detailed structural investigation and analysis in November/December and, to ensure public safety, recommended an immediate full structure closure as well as extensive shoring and bracing at all levels to facilitate the necessary PT tendon repairs. Due to the unforeseen full parking structure shutdown, staff identified an opportunity to complete additional structural repairs that would have been part of the Phase 2 improvements for this project and proceed with painting of the structure. At the January 13, City Council meeting, Council approved additional funding to complete painting as part of this project. The additional painting work is not expected to impact the overall schedule as it can be completed concurrently with the repair work.The overall project is currently anticipated to be completed by the end of March 2026. A partial reopening of the parking structure took place in early February 2026. This project provides necessary structural, electrical, elevator repairs and improvements to the City's Parking Structure (Lot C). X 102 Bus Stops Improvements - Phase 2 SH $372,000.00 Andrew Nguyen X 7/1/2022 06/28 Phase 2, 30% Design is on hold pending staff availability and further information on any potential for grant award. Staff is actively working on seeking outside grant funding for the project through the South Bay Cities Council of Governments. Staff submitted a grant application for $440,000 in Measure M funds on January 16, 2025. Funding was approved by the SBCCOG Board and Metro staff. Staff is working with Metro staff on a funding agreement. This project will improve bus stops throughout the city. These improvements will include Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible curb ramps, crosswalk, striping improvements, furnishing, and other general improvements within direct vicinity of the bus stops. This project is combined with CIP 193 Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements. Phase 1 of the combined project was constructed in spring 2024, and installed Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) and updated signage and striping at select pedestrian crossings on Hermosa Avenue, Manhattan Avenue, Pier Avenue, and Valley Drive. Phase 2 of this combined project will holistically evaluate the safety and accessibility in the vicinity of bus stops on Hermosa Avenue and at select other critical locations throughout the city then design and construct improvements. P E N D I N G P R O J E C T S 3 of 5 Page 82 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 3-12-2026 UPDATED FY 2025-26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Light Blue indicates project milestone updates. ADA ComponentCIP No.Project Name Project CategoryProject Budget1 Project Manager Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutProject Initiation Date Estimated Project Completion Date2 Current Project Status Project Description X 143 PCH Mobility Improvement Project SH $42,375.00 Brandon Araujo X 07/18 TBD The Project is temporarily paused. Metro has reassigned new project manager to oversee the project. The project remains on hold while Metro resolves consultant contract services agreement to further advance the project through the PA&ED phase. Staff is actively working with Metro to seek additional funding through the South Bay Cities Council of Governments. Staff submitted a grant application for $3,000,000 in Measure M funds on January 16, 2025. Funding was approved by the SBCCOG Board and Metro. Staff is working with Metro on a funding agreement. The City has identified a number of complete street project elements that can be implemented to improve mobility, accessibility, and safety along the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) corridor in Hermosa Beach. These elements are described in the Project Study Report prepared by the City and Caltrans in 2015 and include: Traffic Signal Synchronization, Landscape Medians, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements/Removal of Utility Impediments, Transit Access Enhancements, Pedestrian Enhancements, and Aesthetic Enhancements. Collectively, the improvements will address existing, near-term, and long-range future traffic conditions along this corridor by improving intersection operations, reducing instances of unsafe turning movements, creating a safe and more comfortable environment for pedestrians and transit riders, and improving the efficient movement of vehicles along the corridor. X 193 Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements - Phase 2 SH $128,000.00 Andrew Nguyen X 07/22 06/28 Phase 2, 30% Design is on hold pending staff availability and further information on any potential for grant award. Staff is actively working on seeking outside grant funding for the project through the South Bay Cities Council of Governments. Staff submitted a grant application for $440,000 in Measure M funds on January 16, 2025. Funding was approved by the SBCCOG Board and Metro. Staff is working with Metro on a funding agreement. This project will implement rectangular rapid flashing beacons and other measures at several uncontrolled pedestrian crossings on Hermosa Avenue at 4th, 6th, 19th, 24th, and 25th Streets. This project is combined with CIP 102 Bus Stop Improvements. Phase 1 of the combined project was constructed in spring 2024, and installed Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) and updated signing and striping at select pedestrian crossings on Hermosa Avenue, Manhattan Avenue, Pier Avenue, and Valley Drive. Phase 2 of this combined project will holistically evaluate options to reconfigure parking to enhance pedestrian safety, feasibility of curb extensions and median closures, and accessibility on Hermosa Avenue and at select other critical locations throughout the city then design and construct improvements. 417 Storm Drain Improvements - Various Locations SD $827,421.00 TBD X 07/17 05/28 Staff completed emergency storm drain work on Valley Drive south of Gould Avenue in August 2025. Emergency contract ratification to be considered by City Council at August 26, 2025 meeting. Full project scope pending staff availability. This project will design and construct storm drain improvements throughout the city per the Storm Drain Master Plan and other high priority locations. 423 Annual Sewer Improvements SD $1,011,003.00 Andrew Nguyen X 07/20 12/27 Staff is working to identify scope and locations of necessary sewer improvements based on the Sewer Management Plan and noted reported problem areas. Project schedule is delayed due to unforeseen project delays on CIP 421. This project includes design and construction of sewer improvements and repairs based on the Sewer Master Plan. Improvements will include lining, point repairs, removal and replacement. 610 Fort Lots-of-Fun Park Wall and Gate Improvements PK $150,042.00 TBD X 07/23 11/26 Pending staff availability This project provides necessary improvements and repairs to the existing retaining wall and wooden gate at Fort Lots-of-Fun. The project currently includes funding for design of the improvements; construction costs will be further defined through the design process. 611 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements - Phase 2 PB $300,000.00 TBD X 07/25 06/28 Pending staff availability. Project schedule is delayed pending further structural investigation of facility as part of Phase I construction.This project will address other necessary repairs to the parking structure identified in the comprehensive structural evaluation of the facility identified in the detailed structural assessment, not covered in CIP 699. 618 Tsunami Siren PB $100,000.00 TBD X 07/22 TBD Pending staff availability. At the May 13, 2025 CIP Study Session, City Council directed staff to delay the project one year and revisit.This grant-funded project will include working with the Emergency Management Coordinator and the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors to install an outdoor warning siren and integrate the selected siren and the Beach Emergency Evacuation Lighting System (BEELS) systems into the City's alert and warning software platform, Alert South Bay. 621 Comprehensive Downtown Lighting Design PB $142,284.00 TBD X 07/22 03/27 Pending staff availability.This project will assess light levels, electric system requirements, and desired lighting improvements (i.e., ornamental, roadway, pedestrian scale) for the City's Downtown district. The project will identify scope of required improvements and cost estimates for final design and construction. X 625 Citywide ADA Improvements PB $238,039.00 TBD X 07/24 12/27 Pending staff availability.This project will provide improvements to access to the Civic Center to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meet the latest Federal Standards along with the City’s Transition Plan. The project will provide improvements to curb ramps, sidewalk, and parking in front of City Hall and install a wheelchair lift for access from the Valley Drive parking lot to the front of City Hall. X 105 Annual Street Improvements SH $602,974.00 Briana Aube 04/24 10/25 Combined with CIP 695. Construction completed on July 25, 2025 (5 months ahead of original schedule). Notice of Completion recorded 9/10/25. Retention released and project closed out October 2025. Project advertised on 12/12/24 (4 months ahead of schedule), bid opening on 01/15/25. Construction contract awarded by Council on February 25, 2025. Pre-construction meeting was on March 19, 2025. NTP and start of construction April 7, 2025. This project provided for pavement rehabilitation of various streets throughout the city including paving and striping of approximately 2 miles of streets. The project also repaired/replaced deteriorated portions of sidewalk, curb and gutter, and curb ramps. This work will be performed following the sewer and storm drain repairs identified in the Sewer and Drainage Master Plans. This project is combined with CIP 695 Parking Lot A Improvements. 109 Utility Box Wrappings SH $26,516.00 Karla Vargas 07/21 12/25 All art has been designed and installed on the 24 utility boxes.This project will add decorative paint and/or wraps to city-owned utility boxes throughout the city. The City is engaging a local artist cooperative to create the artwork that will either be painted or applied via vinyl wrap to the boxes. City Yard staff, who have been trained in wrap application, will be involved in this project. X 605 City Facilities Condition and Needs Assessment PB $346,530.00 Joe SanClemente 07/23 07/25 Civic Facilities Project Advisory Group presented Council Consideration and Direction on Recommendations from their findings based on regular advisory group meetings at the July 22, 2025 Council meeting. Council voted to receive and file recommendations from the City Manager’s Civic Facilities Project Advisory Group. The project will include an assessment of facilities throughout the City to understand improvement needs. 617 Civic Center Charging Stations PB $51,857.00 Magvern By 07/22 05/25 City staff is coordinating the phasing of this work with SCE and their subcontractors. Phase 1, which is the installation of new switchgear pad and conduit to supply power to the new charging stations was completed on the week of October 14, 2024. The first part of Phase 2, which is the running of electrical wires to all charging station locations of the charging stations was completed December 2024. Second part of Phase 2 which is the installation and connection of the switch gear and meter was completed February 6, 2025. SCE energized the new swithgear on April 8, 2025.The electric charges were activated on May 15, 2025 and are fully operational. This project will explore the electrical power needs and installation of expanded electric vehicle charging infrastructure to serve the Police Department fleet on Bard Street, adjacent the Police Department and City Hall. The expanded charging infrastructure will install 20 Level 2 chargers. COMPLETED PROJECTS 4 of 5 Page 83 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 3-12-2026 UPDATED FY 2025-26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Light Blue indicates project milestone updates. ADA ComponentCIP No.Project Name Project CategoryProject Budget1 Project Manager Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutProject Initiation Date Estimated Project Completion Date2 Current Project Status Project Description 633 Base 3 Electrical Improvements PB $300,000.00 John Oskoui X 03/25 02/26 Bid package advertised for construction May 22, 2025. Bids opened June 25, 2025 and awarded to Delta Electrical, LLC under City Manager contract authority. Contract executed. NTP issued September 8, 2025. Construction started September 15, 2025 and anticipated completion of construction in November 2025. SCE installing new meter to energize the building on November 13, 2025. Contractor to return to test equipment and finalize as needed before re-occupancy of the building. Construction completed on December 5, 2025. Notice of Completion recorded January 7, 2026 and project closeout pending. Retention released and project closed out January 27, 2026. The project includes the design and construction of electrical upgrades and repairs to the City's Community Services building (Base 3) at 1035 Valley Drive. These necessary improvements will allow for safe reopening of the facility that has been closed for use following the electrical fire that occurred October 2025. X 689 Clark Building Renovations PB $414,607.00 Saad Malim 07/17 11/25 Notice of Completion recorded 12/10/25. Retention release and project closed 12/10/25. Staff continues to work on grant reimbursement for full electrification of the building through the Clean Power Alliance. The renovations will include the following: New commercial kitchen per current Los Angeles County Department of Public Health requirements, including new appliances, fixtures, storage cabinets, counter tops, flooring, grease trap system, and lighting; New electric powered heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system; New audio-visual system including built-in speakers, overhead projector, and roll-down projection screen; Architectural upgrades including:Furred out walls to hide system components such as electrical conduit and provide a new X 695 Parking Lot A Improvements PB $207,368.00 Briana Aube 07/19 10/25 Construction completed on July 25, 2025 (5 months ahead of original schedule). Notice of Completion recorded 9/10/25. Retention released and project closed out October 2025. This project will provide pavement rehabilitation in Parking Lot A. SH - STREET AND HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS SD - SEWER/STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS PK - PARK IMPROVEMENTS PB - PUBLIC BUILDING AND GROUND IMPROVEMENTS 1. Current adjusted appropriation as of 10/01/25. 2. Estimated Project Completion Dates are subject to change. 3. Approximately $900,000 is reserved in teh CIP fund for the City Yard that has not yet been appropriated. 5 of 5 Page 84 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach - Department of Public Works Estimated CIP Project Schedule FY 2025-2026 - Updated 03/12/26 Supervisor/PM Q3 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 421 Annual Sewer Improvements Brandon/Andrew 5 390 603 South Park Slope and Irrigation Repairs Brandon/Magvern 5 285 630 Community Center Gas Repair John O /Josh 25 10 5 5 325 633 Base 3 Electrical Improvements John O /Josh 5 225 619 Kelly Court Renovations Randy/Kristian 60 40 15 5 5 555 164 Hermosa Avenue Green Street Heecheol/Briana 40 40 30 15 10 5 300 699 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements - Phase 1 Saad/Karla 60 30 20 10 570 626 CDBG Sidewalk Improvements (NEW)Randy/Magvern 15 50 40 10 5 5 265 107 Slurry Seal (NEW)Heecheol/Magvern 20 20 20 70 70 10 5 5 310 504 Playground Equipment Replacement Project (NEW)John O 20 10 10 40 30 30 10 5 5 270 685 Real Time Crime Center Brandon 10 20 20 20 30 40 40 30 30 30 30 40 30 30 25 20 20 5 5 675 114 Greenwich Village North Undergrounding (NEW)Brandon/Briana 90 100 100 100 70 70 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 10 5 5 1260 106 Annual Streets Improvements (NEW)Heecheol/Kristian 80 80 80 60 20 20 20 30 40 80 80 80 80 80 80 20 15 10 5 1220 115 City Sidewalk Improvements (NEW)Heecheol/Karla 20 113 City Wide Multi-Space Meters Deployment Ken/Brandon/Andrew 30 30 30 40 25 20 25 40 30 30 20 10 5 430 623 Pier Structural Repairs John O/Joe/Brandon/Magvern 40 40 20 25 20 20 30 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 40 30 20 15 10 1240 111 Gateway and Wayfinding Signs Assessment Joe/Brandon/Kristian 20 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 15 15 40 40 40 15 5 780 635 Community Center Windows (NEW)John O/Saad 10 10 30 30 45 45 45 15 15 10 30 60 65 65 60 60 20 15 15 5 810 618 Tsunami Siren Moe 20 20 20 25 25 25 25 20 10 30 25 25 25 15 5 5 320 423 Annual Sewer Improvements Brandon/Andrew 20 20 20 20 60 60 60 60 60 60 30 20 20 40 80 80 80 80 80 80 75 20 5 5 1155 625 City Wide ADA Improvements Randy/Laney 20 25 25 50 50 50 50 40 40 40 40 20 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 10 5 5 710 610 Fort Lots-O-Fun Wall and Gate Improvements TBD 20 20 40 40 40 40 50 30 20 20 30 70 70 70 60 25 10 5 660 417 Annual Storm Drain Improvements Heecheol/20 25 30 30 80 80 50 40 40 40 50 50 50 50 40 20 20 100 80 90 90 90 80 40 20 10 1315 102 Bus Stop Improvements PHASE II Brandon/Andrew 5 10 15 15 30 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 50 40 30 30 30 100 100 100 80 80 193 Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements PHASE II Brandon/Andrew 611 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements - Phase 2 (NEW)John O/Karla/Saad 5 5 10 10 30 30 30 35 35 35 30 20 20 25 25 70 80 80 70 60 15 5 5 730 615 New Corporate Yard Facilities Joe / John O / Saad 90 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 120 120 130 130 150 150 180 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 300 5010 438 Stormwater Dry Wells Assessment Heecheol 10 20 20 20 20 20 10 15 20 20 50 50 50 50 50 50 30 30 40 40 70 70 70 300 1175 143 PCH Mobility Improvement Project PHASE II Joe/Brandon 10 15 15 15 15 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 1000 2090 621 Comprehensive Downtown Lighting Design 20 20 20 40 35 30 30 30 30 50 50 355 TBD FUTURE ANNUAL PAVING PROJECTS 25 70 70 70 70 70 70 20 40 40 80 80 80 200 985 TBD FUTURE CDBG PROJECTS 20 40 40 25 10 15 50 50 15 10 5 5 285 TBD FUTURE ANNUAL ADA PROJECT 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 40 40 300 600 TBD FUTURE ANNUAL SIDEWALK PROJECTS 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 20 40 350 750 TBD FUTURE PIER DECK REPAIRS 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 40 40 800 1100 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Total Hours Needed 675 750 700 755 745 730 670 700 730 780 785 800 760 755 750 730 770 760 800 755 750 655 645 720 625 625 560 570 3.924 4.36 4.07 4.39 4.331 4.244 3.895 4.07 4.244 4.535 4.564 4.651 4.419 4.39 4.36 4.244 4.477 4.419 4.651 4.39 4.36 3.808 3.75 4.186 3.634 3.634 3.256 3.314 Projected Staff Capacity 637.2 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 3.705 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 Availability (Deficit) - Full Staff 33 (42)8 (47)(37)(22)38 8 (22)(72)(77)(92)(52)(47)(42)(22)(62)(52)(92)(47)(42)53 63 (12)83 83 148 138 Availability (Deficit) - Current Staff (Hours)(38)(42)8 (47)(37)(22)38 8 (22)(72)(77)(92)(52)(47)(42)(22)(62)(52)(92)(47)(42)53 63 (12)83 83 148 138 Assumptions:Legend: Administrative staff is available to assist engineers with tasks s t Preparation of request for proposals or on-call task order. PW engineers manage consultant design teams, oversee construction, write staff reports, develop RFPs, etc.Evaluation, conceptual design, or final design. 1700 hours total annual availability per engineer (2080 hours minus holidays, vacation, and sick time).Advertisement for construction (bid document preparation, advertisement, bid review, award at City Council, contract execution). Construction Project close out, including final invoicing, documentaion, reporting to grant agencies. Fixed schedule due to public safety need, grant/funding timeline, or regulatory requirements. COMPLETE 424 Annual Storm Drain Improvements (Bard Street) Heecheol/Briana 617 Civic Center Charging Stations Heecheol/Magvern 605 City Facilities Condition and Needs Assessment Joe 105 Annual Street Improvements Heecheol/Briana 695 Parking Lot A Improvements Heecheol/Briana 502 Greenbelt Pedestrian Trail Brandon/Andrew 604 City Wide ADA Improvements Brandon/Andrew 194 Annual Striping Improvements Brandon/Andrew 689 Clark Building Renovations Saad/Karla 109 Utility Box Wrappings Saad/Karla Q2 Q3Q3Q4Q1 Full staffing assumes 10 engineers average approximately 50% of availability for CIPs (0.5*1700)/12 = 70.8 hours monthly per engineer, therefore 708 hours total monthly availability for CIP work in the engineering team. Current staffing levels in November 2025 are 9 (or 90%). This schedule assumes reaching full staffing levels (100%) by March 2026. Actual schedules are subject to change. Depending on staffing. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Q4 1635 FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 150 Total Engineering Labor Est. (Hrs) Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY 27-28 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Beyond CIP No.Project Name FY 25-26 FY 26-27 Page 85 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach - Department of Public Works Estimated CIP Project Schedule FY 2025-2026 - Updated 03/12/26 Supervisor/PM Q3 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 421 Annual Sewer Improvements Brandon/Andrew 5 390 603 South Park Slope and Irrigation Repairs Brandon/Magvern 5 285 630 Community Center Gas Repair John O /Josh 25 10 5 5 325 633 Base 3 Electrical Improvements John O /Josh 5 225 619 Kelly Court Renovations Randy/Kristian 60 40 15 5 5 555 164 Hermosa Avenue Green Street Heecheol/Briana 40 40 30 15 10 5 300 699 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements - Phase 1 Saad/Karla 60 30 20 10 570 626 CDBG Sidewalk Improvements (NEW)Randy/Magvern 15 50 40 10 5 5 265 107 Slurry Seal (NEW)Heecheol/Magvern 20 20 20 70 70 10 5 5 310 504 Playground Equipment Replacement Project (NEW)John O 20 10 10 40 30 30 10 5 5 270 685 Real Time Crime Center Brandon 10 20 20 20 30 40 40 30 30 30 30 40 30 30 25 20 20 5 5 675 114 Greenwich Village North Undergrounding (NEW)Brandon/Briana 90 100 100 100 70 70 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 10 5 5 1260 106 Annual Streets Improvements (NEW)Heecheol/Kristian 80 80 80 60 20 20 20 30 40 80 80 80 80 80 80 20 15 10 5 1220 115 City Sidewalk Improvements (NEW)Heecheol/Karla 20 113 City Wide Multi-Space Meters Deployment Ken/Brandon/Andrew 30 30 30 40 25 20 25 40 30 30 20 10 5 430 623 Pier Structural Repairs John O/Joe/Brandon/Magvern 40 40 20 25 20 20 30 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 40 30 20 15 10 1240 111 Gateway and Wayfinding Signs Assessment Joe/Brandon/Kristian 20 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 15 15 40 40 40 15 5 780 635 Community Center Windows (NEW)John O/Saad 10 10 30 30 45 45 45 15 15 10 30 60 65 65 60 60 20 15 15 5 810 618 Tsunami Siren Moe 20 20 20 25 25 25 25 20 10 30 25 25 25 15 5 5 320 423 Annual Sewer Improvements Brandon/Andrew 20 20 20 20 60 60 60 60 60 60 30 20 20 40 80 80 80 80 80 80 75 20 5 5 1155 625 City Wide ADA Improvements Randy/Laney 20 25 25 50 50 50 50 40 40 40 40 20 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 10 5 5 710 610 Fort Lots-O-Fun Wall and Gate Improvements TBD 20 20 40 40 40 40 50 30 20 20 30 70 70 70 60 25 10 5 660 417 Annual Storm Drain Improvements Heecheol/20 25 30 30 80 80 50 40 40 40 50 50 50 50 40 20 20 100 80 90 90 90 80 40 20 10 1315 102 Bus Stop Improvements PHASE II Brandon/Andrew 5 10 15 15 30 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 50 40 30 30 30 100 100 100 80 80 193 Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements PHASE II Brandon/Andrew 611 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements - Phase 2 (NEW)John O/Karla/Saad 5 5 10 10 30 30 30 35 35 35 30 20 20 25 25 70 80 80 70 60 15 5 5 730 615 New Corporate Yard Facilities Joe / John O / Saad 90 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 120 120 130 130 150 150 180 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 300 5010 438 Stormwater Dry Wells Assessment Heecheol 10 20 20 20 20 20 10 15 20 20 50 50 50 50 50 50 30 30 40 40 70 70 70 300 1175 143 PCH Mobility Improvement Project PHASE II Joe/Brandon 10 15 15 15 15 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 1000 2090 621 Comprehensive Downtown Lighting Design 20 20 20 40 35 30 30 30 30 50 50 355 TBD FUTURE ANNUAL PAVING PROJECTS 25 70 70 70 70 70 70 20 40 40 80 80 80 200 985 TBD FUTURE CDBG PROJECTS 20 40 40 25 10 15 50 50 15 10 5 5 285 TBD FUTURE ANNUAL ADA PROJECT 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 40 40 300 600 TBD FUTURE ANNUAL SIDEWALK PROJECTS 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 20 40 350 750 TBD FUTURE PIER DECK REPAIRS 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 40 40 800 1100 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Total Hours Needed 675 750 700 755 745 730 670 700 730 780 785 800 760 755 750 730 770 760 800 755 750 655 645 720 625 625 560 570 3.924 4.36 4.07 4.39 4.331 4.244 3.895 4.07 4.244 4.535 4.564 4.651 4.419 4.39 4.36 4.244 4.477 4.419 4.651 4.39 4.36 3.808 3.75 4.186 3.634 3.634 3.256 3.314 Projected Staff Capacity 637.2 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 3.705 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 4.116 Availability (Deficit) - Full Staff 33 (42)8 (47)(37)(22)38 8 (22)(72)(77)(92)(52)(47)(42)(22)(62)(52)(92)(47)(42)53 63 (12)83 83 148 138 Availability (Deficit) - Current Staff (Hours)(38)(42)8 (47)(37)(22)38 8 (22)(72)(77)(92)(52)(47)(42)(22)(62)(52)(92)(47)(42)53 63 (12)83 83 148 138 Assumptions:Legend: Administrative staff is available to assist engineers with tasks s t Preparation of request for proposals or on-call task order. PW engineers manage consultant design teams, oversee construction, write staff reports, develop RFPs, etc.Evaluation, conceptual design, or final design. 1700 hours total annual availability per engineer (2080 hours minus holidays, vacation, and sick time).Advertisement for construction (bid document preparation, advertisement, bid review, award at City Council, contract execution). Construction Project close out, including final invoicing, documentaion, reporting to grant agencies. Fixed schedule due to public safety need, grant/funding timeline, or regulatory requirements. COMPLETE 424 Annual Storm Drain Improvements (Bard Street) Heecheol/Briana 617 Civic Center Charging Stations Heecheol/Magvern 605 City Facilities Condition and Needs Assessment Joe 105 Annual Street Improvements Heecheol/Briana 695 Parking Lot A Improvements Heecheol/Briana 502 Greenbelt Pedestrian Trail Brandon/Andrew 604 City Wide ADA Improvements Brandon/Andrew 194 Annual Striping Improvements Brandon/Andrew 689 Clark Building Renovations Saad/Karla 109 Utility Box Wrappings Saad/Karla Q2 Q3Q3Q4Q1 Full staffing assumes 10 engineers average approximately 50% of availability for CIPs (0.5*1700)/12 = 70.8 hours monthly per engineer, therefore 708 hours total monthly availability for CIP work in the engineering team. Current staffing levels in November 2025 are 9 (or 90%). This schedule assumes reaching full staffing levels (100%) by March 2026. Actual schedules are subject to change. Depending on staffing. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Q4 1635 FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 150 Total Engineering Labor Est. (Hrs) Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY 27-28 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Beyond CIP No.Project Name FY 25-26 FY 26-27 Page 86 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PR-002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council APPROVE SPECIAL EVENT LONG-TERM AGREEMENT WITH HOPE CHAPEL FROM 2026 THROUGH 2028 TO PROVIDE ANNUAL HOPE CHAPEL PICNIC EVENTS (Special Events and Filming Coordinator Austin DeWeese) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Approve a special event long-term agreement (LTA) with Hope Chapel from 2026 through 2028 to provide annual Hope Chapel picnic events (Attachment); and 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest the LTA, subject to approval by the City Attorney. Executive Summary: The Parks and Recreation Department is tasked with overseeing special events on public property. To support and develop a long-term approach to the scheduling of events, eligible events can qualify for an LTA with the City. At its January 13, 2026 meeting, City Council authorized staff to begin LTA negotiations with Hope Chapel for Hope Chapel Picnic covering 2026 through 2028. Background: The LTA Program allows organizations that meet the eligibility requirements to apply for an LTA to solidify event dates for up to three years, eliminating the need for organizations to submit a special event application each year and participate in the annual review and approval process by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and City Council. The Hope Chapel Picnic would consist of a community picnic at Valley Park with food, music, games, and activities for all ages. The event producer anticipates approximately 1,000 participants and spectators throughout the course of each event. Past Commission and Council Actions Meeting Date Description Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: The Commission recommended City Council authorize staff to begin LTA negotiations with Hope Chapel for the Hope Chapel Picnic in 2026 through 2028 on dates that would not exceed Page 87 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date Description December 2, 2025 monthly event day limits outlined in the Special Event Policy Guide. City Council: January 13, 2026 Council approved the commencement of LTA negotiations with Hope Chapel for Hope Chapel Picnic from 2026 through 2028. Discussion: Staff worked with Hope Chapel to establish mutually agreeable terms for a Long -Term Agreement (LTA) for the Hope Chapel Picnic from 2026–2028. Negotiations are complete, and staff recommends approval of the proposed LTA with event dates of September 27, 2026; September 26, 2027; and September 24, 2028. These dates do not increase the monthly event days previously approved by City Council in 2026 (17 days) and remain within the monthly limit of 15 for 2027 and 2028, as set forth in the Special Event Policy Guide. Fiscal Impact: If the proposed LTA is approved, the General Fund would receive approximately $3,480 annually in indirect costs from the special event location fee, totaling roughly $10,440 over three years, in addition to direct costs for the amplif ied sound permit and reserved parking, at a total cost to be determined. Attachment: Proposed LTA with Hope Chapel Respectfully Submitted by: Austin DeWeese, Special Events and Filming Coordinator Concur: Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Concur: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 88 of 1126 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND HOPE CHAPEL CHRISTIAN CHURCH THIS AGREEMENT (hereinafter called “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of March 24, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Hermosa Beach (a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254) (“City”) and Hope Chapel Christian Church, a California non-profit religious corporation (hereinafter called “HC”). CITY and HC are sometimes referred to herein as “Party” and collectively referred to as “Parties.” RECITALS A. CITY is the owner of certain real property commonly known as Valley Park located at 2521 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (hereinafter referred to “Valley Park”). B. HC desires to organize, coordinate, produce and oversee the Hope Chapel Picnic (“Event”) at Valley Park pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. C. The CITY is willing to make Valley Park available for the Event due to the benefit it provides to the community. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: Section 1. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on March 24, 2026 and terminate on December 31, 2028 unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Section 2. HC’s Duties: a. Event. HC may organize, coordinate, produce and oversee the Event, which consists of a community picnic with food, music, games, and activities for all ages. Event activities would take place in Valley Park. The event must Page 89 of 1126 remain open to the public. Event days included as part of this Agreement shall be: September, 27, 2026; September, 26, 2027; and September, 24, 2028 b. Annual Event Confirmation. HC must annually inform the CITY of its intent to produce the Event, including confirmation of event dates and event times, no later than three (3) months prior to the event dates by submission of a Special Events Application, available on the City’s Website. Should HC desire to reschedule an event date(s) from the dates outlined in this Agreement, it must do so in writing no later than three (3) months prior to the requested event date(s). CITY will review the request against other activities and events booked within the City. While approval of a date change will not be unreasonably withheld, already scheduled activities or events will have priority. Use of additional location(s) may be approved as mutually agreed upon between the CITY and HC provided HC informs the CITY of this request at least three (3) months prior to the Event. CITY reserves the right in its sole discretion at any time or times to cancel the Event and/or suspend the use of Event location(s) subject to this Agreement, for any duration to protect public health and safety. Any such closure will not constitute a breach or a default of this Agreement. CITY shall have no liability whatsoever to HC for the effect of such suspension and closure on any Event, nor shall CITY have any responsibility to provide HC with substitute Event dates or locations. HC’s rights under this Agreement are subject and subordinate to CITY’s police and emergency powers in addition to CITY’s rights to manage its municipal facilities, including outdoor public spaces and its contractual rights as described in this Agreement. c. Event Permits and Agreements. HC shall obtain permits from CITY for Event and shall enter into and comply with all agreements for such permits as required by CITY, including but not limited to the following: Any required permits from the Community Development Department pertaining to building and safety review. Any required permits from the Los Angeles County Fire Department. d. Fee to CITY. HC shall pay CITY direct and indirect costs, including but not limited to the provision of CITY staff time dedicated to the Event, Amplified Page 90 of 1126 Sound Permit fees, parking fees, daily special event category fees, and vendor fees as per the Special Events Policy Guide, which may be amended from time to time. e. Annual Review. Within sixty (60) days prior to and after each Event, HC shall provide an annual overview to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission in the form of an agendized presentation. The pre-event presentation shall highlight: a general event overview including anticipated number of attendees; an overview of the event footprint and individualized setup; and anticipated impacts to the community as a result of the event. The post-event presentation shall include: a general overview including the actual number of attendees; actual impact(s) to the community as a result of the event; and any event struggle(s) and success(es). f. Environmental Sustainable Measures. HC shall implement the CITY’s environmental sustainability measures, including but not limited to: HC shall only use electric generators or generators operated with a 50% blend of bio-diesel fuel, or equivalent or lower emissions sources. HC shall incorporate sustainability requirements into vendor agreements. HC shall advertise green measures and rules in event advertising. HC shall limit single-use paper, packaging, and décor items. HC shall limit use of handouts, flyers, and giveaways. HC shall enact a no-idling requirement for vehicles. HC shall provide on-site personnel to ensure that litter and trash are minimized, and recycling is maximized. HC shall encourage vehicles used in connection with the event, are hybrid, electric, or CNG vehicles. HC participate in pre-event and post-event reviews of compliance with sustainability measures. g. Parking Spaces. HC may request dedicated use of public parking spaces as needed for Event activities including parking of Event -related vehicles; storage of essential Event-related equipment and supplies; and other Event- related structures for each Event. Use of these spaces must be mutually agreed upon between the CITY and HC following submittal of a site plan by HC outlining the use of the parking space(s) at least ten (10) working days prior to each Event. While approval of parking request(s) will not be Page 91 of 1126 unreasonably withheld, already scheduled activities or events will have priority. The CITY will consider approval based on the location, seasonal needs for parking, and the overall impacts to the loss of parking spaces to the area. HC shall ensure the spaces are clean from debris, and other materials that were collected as a result of Event activities. h. Logistical Meetings. HC is required to participate in logistical and planning meetings with relevant CITY departments as requested by the City. i. Recycling, and Trash Facilities. HC shall provide trash and recycling receptacles for each Event as required by the CITY. Recyclable items shall be separated from refuse/trash. HC shall coordinate with CITY’s franchisee refuser hauler to add recycling containers in convenient locations to ensure capacity and reduce litter. The location, delivery, and pick-up of these items must be mutually agreed upon between HC and the CITY prior to each Event. j. Insurance. HC shall provide comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate naming "the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents, volunteers, and employees as additional insureds." HC shall maintain insurance coverage meeting the standards outlined in this Section at all times during the term of the Events permitted by this Agreement. All certificates are subject to approval of the City’s Risk Manager. Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Form CG 00 01 covering commercial general liability on an "occurrence" basis, including property damage, bodily injury, death, and personal and advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement, or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. The City reserves the right to request greater or lesser amounts of insurance coverage. If HC maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be ent itled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. HC shall furnish properly executed certificates of insurance to City, which certificates shall clearly evidence all coverage required above and provide that such insurance shall not be materially changed, terminated or allowed to expire except on thirty (30) days prior written notice to City; and further, shall provide that if HC Page 92 of 1126 fails to pay any required deductible or self-insured retention, City may do so at HC’s expense. k. Indemnification. HC shall indemnify and hold harmless the CITY, its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, costs and expenses (including but not limited to court costs, penalties, expert fees and reasonable attorneys’ fees), judgments, liabilities and causes of action of any nature whatsoever and damages for injuries to persons and property arising from HC‘s use of Valley Park pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to HC‘s negligent or wrongful acts, errors or omissions in the set-up, operation and tear-down of its improvements and use of Valley Park by HC’s guests, patrons, invitees, customers, employees, officers, and contractors hired in connection with this Agreement. HC shall promptly pay the amount of any final and non- appealable judgment rendered against CITY, its officers, employees and agents for any such indemnified claims, and reasonable costs, and reasonable expert and attorney fees incurred by CITY in the defense of such claims. HC’s obligations under this Section shall survive any termination of this Agreement. Section 3. CITY’s Duties. a. Event Permits. CITY shall provide event permits to HC for each Event unless CITY determines in its sole discretion that it would not be in the public interest or that it would be averse to the public health, safety, or welfare. Section 4. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned in whole or in part by either Party, without the prior written consent of the other Party. Section 5. Independent Contractor. HC will act hereunder as an independent contractor. This Agreement shall not and is not intended to constitute HC as an agent, servant, or employee of CITY and shall not and is not intended to create the relationship of partnership, joint venture or association between CITY and HC. Section 6. Compliance with the Law. Should it be determined that this Agreement or any provision hereof violates any federal, state, or local law or regulation, then the Parties shall promptly modify this Agreement to the extent necessary to bring about compliance with such law and/or regulation; provided, however, that if such modification would cause this Agreement to fail in its essential purpose or purposes, it shall be deemed cancelled by Page 93 of 1126 mutual agreement of the Parties and neither Party shall have any further obligations or liabilities with respect to this Agreement. Section 7. Termination. CITY may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to HC if CITY determines in its sole discretion that continuation of this Agreement would not be in the public interest, that it would be adverse to the public health, safety, or welfare, or that a substantial portion of Valley Park is unavailable due to construction activity. Prior to termination on the ground that a sub stantial portion of Valley Park is unavailable due to construction activity, CITY shall provide HC an opportunity to propose adjustments to the venue or an alternative location for the Event. HC’s proposed adjustments or alternative shall be provided within thirty (30) days of written notice from CITY and is subject to approval of the City Council, in its sole discretion, in a public meeting. Upon termination of the Agreement, any events subsequent to the termination will no longer be the responsibility of HC. Section 8. Notice. Any notice, demand, request, approval or communication required to be made or given pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement may be either personally served upon the Party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid as follows: For HC: Hope Chapel 2420 Pacific Coast Highway Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (310) 373-4673 Attention: Joey Iside For CITY: City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (310) 318-0216 Attention: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four (24) hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. Section 9. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire integrated agreement between CITY and HC, and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by a written Page 94 of 1126 instrument signed by both Parties. The Parties anticipate that, in addition to this Agreement, they will enter into an event agreement for each Event setting forth precise terms and conditions applicable to that Event. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] Page 95 of 1126 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND HOPE CHAPEL CHRISTIAN CHURCH IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVED BY: Steve Napolitano City Manager ATTESTED BY: Ann Yang Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jason Baltimore Interim City Attorney HOPE CHAPEL CHRISTIAN CHURCH Zac Nazarian Hope Chapel Senior Pastor ____________________________________ Joey Iside Hope Chapel Operations Manager Page 96 of 1126 Page 97 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 4 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PR-009 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council APPROVE REMOVAL OF THREE OF SIX BASKETBALL HOOPS ON WEST SIDE OF CLARK FIELD (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council approve the removal of three of six basketball hoops along the western side of Clark Field, and the associated safety improvement measures. Executive Summary: The City’s risk management team identified (3) non-standard basketball courts located within the service road along the west side of Clark Field and associated safety concerns. Staff brought an item to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (Commission) on February 10, 2026 to solicit input on options to enhance public safety such as removal of some or all of the basketball hoops, and other potential risk mitigation measures. The Commission provided staff with input, taking into consideration public comments, for the desire to restore some or all of the recreation hoops in potentially an alternative configuration to limit the potential for gameplay and improve overall safety. Staff reviewed the input and comments received and developed a plan for Council consideration that includes the restoration of three (3) of the six (6) hoops (i.e., elimination of one hoop in each court), and modifications to the poles to allow for one 8-foot rim and two 9-foot rims, which are more suitable for younger players, installation of safety signage, and the future resurfacing of the play area . Background: The six basketball hoops along the western side of Clark Field are used for leisure and are not designed as recreational courts. The basketball hoops are aligned back-to-back with a three-foot wide area on each sideline. One side abuts the ballfield fence, and the other abuts a retaining wall. The space between each hoop measures approximately 60 feet by 24.5 feet wide. By comparison, standard regulation dimensions as specified by the American Institute of Architects (AIA) for an individual outdoor basketball court are 84 feet long by 50 feet wide for a full court and 50 feet long by 47 feet wide for a half -court, with a recommended Page 98 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 4 standards buffer zone of at least 3 feet, with 5 to 10 feet recommended for high -traffic or competitive settings. Following the review of the non-standard basketball courts located within the service road along the west side of Clark Field and associated safety concerns, Public Works crews removed the six (6) backboards on February 2, 2026 and posted notices on the basketball posts with information about the removal and plans for discussion at the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (Commission) (Attachment). Staff then brought an item to Commission at its February 10, 2026 meeting for further discussion and to solicit input on options to enhance public safety such as removal of some or all of the basketball hoops, and other potential risk mitigation measures. The Commission provided staff with input, taking into consideration public comments, and the desire to restore some or all of the recreation hoops in potentially an alternative configuration to limit the potential for gameplay and improve overall safety. On, February 25, 2026, staff met with a group of nearby residents and the President of the Hermosa Beach Youth Basketball League to further discuss options and plans to restore some of the hoops with an alternative configuration. Subsequent to this meeting, on February 26, 2026, Public Works staff restored one of the hoops and developed and installed associated safety signage as an interim measure. Past Commission Action Meeting Date Description February 10, 2026 Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission provided staff with input, taking into consideration public comments, for the desire to restore some or all of the recreation hoops in potentially an alternative configuration to limit the potential for gameplay and improve overall safety. Discussion: The area along the western side of Clark Field is physically constrained for basketball play. A short retaining wall borders one side of the asphalt, while a ballfield fence borders the other, leaving limited buffer space between active play and fixed, hard surfaces. The asphalt area also functions as a pedestrian and maintenance access route, resulting in overlapping uses within a confined footprint. If informal or pick-up basketball games occur in this location, they involve high-energy physical activity immediately adjacent to rigid structures and within a shared circulation corridor. These conditions raise concerns regarding a potential “dangerous condition of public property” under Government Code Section 835. A public entity may be liable where (1) property is in a dangerous condition, (2) the condition proximately causes injury, (3) the risk of injury is reasonably foreseeable, and (4) the entity had actual or constructive notice and sufficient time to take protective measures. Given the proximity of th e retaining Page 99 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 4 wall and fencing, the absence of safety buffers, and the foreseeable risk of player collisions or pedestrian conflicts, it could be argued that a dangerous condition exists particularly if the City knew or reasonably should have known of the configuration and did not take reasonable mitigation steps. While Government Code Section 831.7 provides immunity for injuries arising from certain hazardous recreational activities, reliance on that immunity may be limited in this context. Basketball is not typically classified as an inherently hazardous recreational activity under the statute, and immunity does not apply where a dangerous condition of public property exists independent of the activity itself or where the public entity creates or maintains a known structural hazard. Here, the placement and maintenance of basketball hoops in a narrow, mixed-use corridor could itself be alleged to constitute the dangerous condition. In consideration of community feedback following the removal of the basketbal l backboards, and the Commission’s input to restore some or all of the recreation hoops, staff proposes that the City Council consider approval of retaining three of the six basketball hoops along the western side of Clark Field. If the City Council approves retaining three hoops, staff would implement the following measures to reduce risk exposure and clarify the limited recreational intent of the area: Restore three basketball hoops, two set at 9 feet and one at 8 feet, all oriented in the same direction to discourage full-court or organized game play and reduce the perception that the area functions as a regulation basketball court. One hoop was already installed on February 26, 2026 and the remaining two hoops would require minor modifications to the posts by City crews. Resurface the asphalt in the vicinity of the retained hoops as part of an upcoming slurry seal project (Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project 107), anticipated within approximately four months of this report, to address surface deterioration. Install signage clarifying the informal and shared -use nature of the area, such as: “Use at Your Own Risk,” “Not a Designated Court,” “Area Shared with Pedestrians”, “Yield to Pedestrians”, and/or “No Organized Games – Casual Play Only.” Signage was installed adjacent to one hoop on February 26, 2026; additional signage would be installed adjacent to the remaining two hoops. Conduct and document regular inspections, corrective actions, and responses to complaints to demonstrate proactive maintenance, monitoring, and oversight. If approved, retention of the three basketball hoops would constitute a City Council – approved policy determination reflecting a deliberative balancing of community recreational interests and risk considerations. Such formal action may help demonstrate that the City’s decision was a reasoned policy choice, rather than inadvertent neglect, should liability issues later arise. Page 100 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 4 This approach seeks to preserve limited, casual recreational opportunities while implementing reasonable risk mitigation measures and documenting the City’s proactive oversight. Fiscal Impact: The modifications of the backboards and installation of associated signage will be completed by Public Works staff. The resurfacing of the roadway adjacent to the three (3) hoops will be included as part of CIP 107 Slurry Seal Improvements, which is included in the current Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 budget. The cost for the required crack seal repair and slurry seal overlay will be bid as a separate items part of CIP 107 and is anticipated to cost approximately $11,000. No additional funding is required as part of the staff recommendation. Attachment: Basketball Court Removal Notice – February 2, 2026 Respectfully Submitted by: Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director Concur: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director Concur: Tyler Cashman, Interim Human Resources Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Concur: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 101 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Public Works Department NOTICE OF BASKETBALL EQUIPMENT REMOVAL Public Works has removed the basketball backboards and rims at the three (3) courts located along the westerly side of Clark Field on Monday, February 2, 2026. The City’s risk management team has identified that the courts are non -standard and should be removed to ensure public safety. The removal of these courts will be discussed further at the February 10, 2026, Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting at 6 pm in City Hall. For further information, please contact Joshua Sexton at the Public Works Department, at jsexton@hermosabeach.gov or 310-318-0214. Page 102 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-CMO-016 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council RATIFY LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR REFORMING MENTAL HEALTHCARE WITHIN THE COUNTY’S HOMELESSNESS SERVICES SYSTEM MOTION (Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council ratify a letter of support (Attachment) sent on March 16, 2026 supporting Los Angeles County Supervisors Lindsey P. Horvath and Kathryn Barger’s motion, Reforming Mental Healthcare Within the County’s Homelessness Services System, at the March 17, 2026 Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Meeting. Executive Summary: The City of Hermosa Beach regularly expresses its support or opposition regarding matters that would have an impact on the City. The proposal represents a step toward strengthening coordination between behavioral health services and homelessness response efforts throughout Los Angeles County. Background: On March 17, 2026, Supervisor Lindsey Horvath called for stronger coordination between the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (DMH) and the Los Angeles County Department of Homeless Services and Housing (HSH) to improve mental health services for people experiencing homelessness. Los Angeles County has a significant number of unhoused individuals living with serious mental illness. According to the 2025 Point-in-Time Homeless Count, approximately 15,930 people experiencing homelessness have serious mental illness, with o ver 10,800 living unsheltered. The current behavioral health system is not fully integrated with the homelessness response system, creating barriers to care. The motion aims to better align mental health services with the County’s homelessness response system, ensuring that individuals experiencing homelessness and severe mental illness receive timely and appropriate care. Analysis: Page 103 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 3 The motion, Reforming Mental Healthcare Within the County’s Homelessness Services System, aims to better align mental health services with the County’s homelessness response system, ensuring that individuals experiencing homelessness and severe mental illness receive timely and appropriate care. The major actions proposed in the motion include the following: 1. Strengthen coordination between departments Establish a dedicated DMH team to work directly with HSH on cases involving people experiencing homelessness with serious mental illness. Conduct regular case review meetings to resolve barriers to care. 2. Improve service access Create clearer referral pathways from HSH to DMH services and housing programs. Explore presumptive eligibility for individuals suspected of having serious mental illness. Expand field-based care, ensuring services reach individuals on the streets, in shelters, and in interim housing. 3. Enhance collaboration and planning Increase data sharing between County departments and service providers. Align planning for funding programs such as Prop 1, Behavioral Health Services Act (BHSA), and other behavioral health initiatives. Work with managed care plans to clarify responsibilities for behavioral health services for people experiencing homelessness. 4. Improve program effectiveness Strengthen oversight and performance monitoring of Full Service Partnership (FSP) providers to ensure services are delivered in the field. Expand programs like the Interim Housing Outreach Program (IHOP). Provide additional training for staff working with unhoused individuals. 5. Increase accountability and reporting Require DMH and HSH to report back to the Board within 90 days and biannually thereafter on implementation progress. The motion seeks to create a more coordinated, field-based, and accountable system of care that better serves individuals experiencing homelessness and serious mental illness by integrating mental health services with the County’s homelessness response efforts. Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Page 104 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 3 Attachment: Letter of Support for the motion Reforming Mental Healthcare Within the County’s Homelessness Services System. Respectfully Submitted by: Sara Russo, Senior Management Analyst Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 105 of 1126 City Council 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 | hermosabeach.gov | HermosaBchCity HermosaBeachCity March 16, 2026 The Honorable Board of Supervisors 500 West Temple Room 383 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Re: Support for Reforming and Integrating Mental Healthcare Within the County’s Homeless Services System Motion Dear Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors: On behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach, I am writing to express strong support for the motion titled “Reforming and Integrating Mental Healthcare within the County’s Homeless Services System.” The proposal represents an important step toward strengthening coordination between behavioral health services and homelessness response efforts throughout Los Angeles County. Across the region, local jurisdictions continue to experience the profound impacts of homelessness, particularly among individuals living with serious mental illness. The integration of mental health services with the broader homelessness response system is critical to improving outcomes for vulnerable residents and ensuring that services are delivered in a coordinated and effective manner. The motion’s emphasis on field-based engagement, cross-departmental collaboration, and improved data sharing reflects best practices that are necessary to address the complex needs of individuals experiencing homelessness. We particularly appreciate the motion’s focus on enhancing collaboration between the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and the Los Angeles County Department of Homeless Services and Housing. Aligning these systems will help ensure that individuals experiencing homelessness and severe mental illness are connected to appropriate care, housing resources, and long-term support services. Strengthening referral pathways, expanding field-based services, and improving program accountability will help close gaps that currently prevent many individuals from accessing the care they need. We would ask that the motion include language that states the Department of Mental Health should also be coordinating with local jurisdictions, particularly those that case conference/care coordinate with us. Additionally, the proposed efforts to expand multidisciplinary engagement teams, improve training for providers, and streamline coordination with managed care plans represent meaningful steps toward building a more responsive behavioral health system. These initiatives will support local jurisdictions and community partners working on the front lines of the homelessness crisis. Page 106 of 1126 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 | hermosabeach.gov | HermosaBchCity HermosaBeachCity Page 2 Addressing homelessness requires a coordinated regional approach, and behavioral health services are a critical component of that effort. By strengthening collaboration across departments and aligning mental health services with the County’s homeless services system, this motion helps advance a more effective and compassionate response. For these reasons, the City of Hermosa Beach respectfully urges the Board to adopt this motion and continue advancing policies that improve access to behavioral health care and housing stability for residents across Los Angeles County. Thank you for your leadership and commitment to addressing these complex challenges. Sincerely, Michael Detoy Mayor cc: South Bay Cities Council of Governments Los Angeles County Supervisor Holly Mitchell, 2nd District Hermosa Beach City Council Page 107 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-CMO-015 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 3.32 TITLED TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX (Senior Management Analyst Ken Bales) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Waive full second reading and adopt by title only “An Ordinance amending Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 3.32.020 Definitions, 3.32.030 Tax Imposed, and 3.32.100 Appeal (Attachment); and 2. Direct the City Clerk to print and publish a summary ordinance in a newspaper of general circulation within 15 days following adoption and post a copy on the City’s bulletin for 30 days. Executive Summary: At its March 10, 2026 meeting, City Council introduced for first reading an ordinance to update the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (“HBMC”) section 3.32. Background: HBMC 3.32.020 provides the following definitions, in relevant part: Hotel means any structure, which is occupied or intended or designed for occupancy by transients for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes, and includes any hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, studio hotel, bachelor hotel, lodging house, rooming house, apartment house, dormitory, public or privat e club, mobile home or house trailer at a fixed location, or other similar structure or portion thereof. Occupancy means the use or possession, or the right to the use or possession of any room or room or portion thereof, in any hotel for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes. Operator means the person who is the proprietor of the hotel, hostel, or any other permitted short-term rental, whether in the capacity of owner, lessee, sublessee, mortgagee in possession, licensee, and includes companies that arran ge for reservations online. Though the operator performs his functions through a managing agent of any type or character other than an employee, the managing agent shall also be determined an operator for the purposes of this chapter and shall have the same duties and liabilities as his principal. Compliance with the Page 108 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 2 provisions of this chapter by either the principal or the managing agent shall, however, be considered to be compliance by both. Transient means: o Any person as defined in this section who exercises, for any period of time, occupancy or is entitled to occupancy by reason of concession, permit, right of access, license or other agreement; or o Any individual who personally exercises occupancy or is enti tled to occupancy by reason of concession, permit, right of access, license or other agreement, for a period of thirty (30) consecutive calendar days or less. HBMC 3.32.030 states: For occupancy of any hotel, motel, hostel, hospital or permitted short -term rental as defined, each transient is subject to and shall pay a tax in the amount of fourteen (14) percent of the rent or bill charged by the operator. Said tax constitutes a debt owed by the transient to the city which is extinguished only by payment t o the operator of the hotel, motel, hostel, hospital, or other permitted short -term accommodation at the time the rent or bill is paid. If the rent or bill is paid in installments, a proportionate share of the tax shall be paid with each installment. The unpaid tax shall be due upon the transient’s ceasing to occupy space in the hotel, motel, hostel, hospital or other permitted short-term accommodation. If for any reason the tax due is not paid to the operator, the tax administrator may require that such tax shall be paid directly to the tax administrator. (Emphasis added.) Regarding TOT appeals, HBMC 3.32.100 allows any operator of a hotel who is aggrieved by the imposition of TOT may file an appeal to the Council through the City Manager’s office within a certain time period for an appeal hearing. Past Council Action Meeting Date Description March 10, 2026 City Council introduced an Ordinance to amend HBMC section 3.32. Fiscal Impact: There is no direct fiscal impact to updating HBMC sections 3.32.020 Definitions, 3.32.030 Tax Imposed, or 3.32.100 Appeal. Attachment: Draft Ordinance Respectfully Submitted by: Ken Bales, Senior Management Analyst Noted for Fiscal Impact: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 109 of 1126 Page 1 of 2 ORD NO. 26-XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 26-XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS TO CHAPTER 3.32 (TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX) OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) has the power to tax pursuant to California Government Code section 37100.5; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized to impose a transient occupancy tax (“TOT”) and adopt administrative collection procedures to tax a person staying thirty (30) days or less in hotels, motels, and similar lodgings pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code section 7280 et seq.; and WHEREAS, the City imposes TOTs pursuant to Chapter 3.32 of the Municipal Code (“Code”), and short-term rentals are subject to TOTs pursuant to Sections 3.32.020 and 3.32.030 of the Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council (“Council”) desires to amend certain provisions of the Code related to short-term rentals for clarification purposes ensuring the TOT is administered according to the provisions approved by the voters. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND FIND AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. Findings. The Council hereby finds that the proposed amendments do not increase or otherwise expand the scope of the TOT beyond that approved by the voters. SECTION 3. Amendment. The Council hereby amends Chapter 3.32 (TOT) of the Code as follows: a. Section 3.32.020 (Definitions). The definition of Operator is amended by deleting the words “any other permitted” before the words “short term rental”. b. Section 3.32.030 (Tax Imposed). Section 3.32.030 is hereby amended by deleting the words “permitted” and “other permitted” before the words “short-term rental”. Page 110 of 1126 Page 2 of 2 ORD NO. 26-XXXX c. Section 3.32.100 (Appeal). Section 3.32.100 is hereby amended by replacing the word “council” with the words “city manager or their designee”, and the words “city manager” with the words “city manager or their designee”. SECTION 4. California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines (Chapter 3 to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations) because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. SECTION 5. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications; and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. SECTION 6. Certification. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City’s book of original ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within fifteen (15) days after the Ordinance’s passage and adoption, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 10th day of March 2026. Mayor Mike Detoy PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ ________________________________ [________] Jason Baltimore Interim City Clerk Interim City Attorney Page 111 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 6 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-CDD-036 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council ADOPT AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 17.21 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS CEQA: Determine the action to be Statutorily Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code § 21080.17. (Community Development Director Alison Becker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Determine the Ordinance to be Statutorily Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code § 21080.17 ; 2. Adopt by title only and waive second reading of an Ordinance (Attachment 1) repealing and replacing Chapter 17.21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code pertaining to Accessory (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADU); and 3. Direct the City Clerk to print and publish the summary ordinance i n a newspaper of general circulation within 15 days following adoption and post it on the City’s bulletin for 30-days. Executive Summary: At its March 10, 2026 meeting City Council held a public hearing and approved a Zone Text Amendment (ZTA repeal and replace Chapter 17.21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to comply with recent changes to state law that impose new limits on local authority to regulate Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs). Except as otherwise noted, these new laws took effect on January 1, 2026. The Planning Commission voted unanimously during their January 20, 2026 meeting to adopt a resolution advising City Council to adopt the proposed ordinance, and to find the action statutorily exempt from CEQA. Background: In recent years, the California Legislature has approved, and the Governor has signed into law, numerous bills that impose new limits on local authority to regulate ADUs and JADUs. In late 2025, four new bills were enacted that further amend stat e ADU law. Additionally, on December 29, 2025 the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) sent the City of Hermosa Beach a letter indicating that the City’s ADU ordinance failed to comply with state ADU laws in various ways Page 112 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 6 (Attachment 2). The proposed ordinance would resolve the issues identified by HCD and bring the City’s ADU policies in compliance with state law as described below. At its January 20, 2026 meeting, the Planning Commission, which serves as the advisor to the City Council on all land-use matters, reviewed the related Zone Text Amendment and unanimously recommended City Council’s approval amending Chapter 17.21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) related to Accessory and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units in line with the staff recommendation, and in the interest of compliance with State law. At the March 10, 2026, meeting, City Council considered the Planning Commission’s recommendation and adopted the draft ordinance as recommended. Past Commission Action Meeting Date Description January 20, 2026 Planning Commission holds a public hearing and unanimously votes to approve a resolution to recommend that the City Council repeal and replace Chapter 17.21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code relating to Accessory and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units. March 10, 2026 City Council approved ZTA 25-XXXX repealing and replacing HBMC Chapter 17.21 pertaining to ADUs and JADUs Assembly Bill (AB) 462 – Coastal Development Permits; Disaster-Affected Areas Existing law requires most ADUs proposed in the Coastal Zone to obtain a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) in addition to other local ADU permit requirements. Historically, the CDP for an ADU was not subject to the state ADU law’s 60-day shot clock to approve or deny a complete ADU application. Additionally, local permitting decisions on a CDP for an ADU could be appealed to the California Coastal Co mmission if the underlying property was subject to the Coastal Commission’s appeals jurisdiction (as set forth in Public Resources Code 30603). AB 462 alters the status quo on numerous fronts. Most notably, local agencies with a certified local coastal program (LCP) must now approve or deny a CDP application for an ADU within 60 days of receiving a complete application. The local agency’s review of the CDP application must also take place “concurrently with the process to approve or deny” any other permit required to approve the ADU (i.e., an ADU permit and building permit). (Gov. Code, § 66329(a).) AB 462 also eliminates the ability to appeal a CDP for an ADU to the Coastal Commission. If a local agency does not have a certified LCP, then it now must “immediately notify” the Coastal Commission when an ADU application is submitted. Subject to limited exceptions, the Coastal Commission’s review of the CDP application is subject to the same 60-day shot clock that applies to local agencies with a certified LCP. (Id., at (b)(1)–(5).) The City does not have a fully certified LCP, so City staff now immediately notify the Coastal Commission when an ADU application is submitted. Page 113 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 6 Beyond changes to CDP processing, AB 462 modifies the rules governing the issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CofO) for an ADU. Historically, state law has prohibited a local agency from issuing a CofO for an ADU before one is issued for the primary dwelling (i.e., the primary dwelling must have a CofO before the ADU.) AB 462 creates a narrow exception to this prohibition for detached ADUs when all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) the Governor has declared a state of emergency for the county on or after February 1, 2025; (2) the primary dwelling was substantially damaged or destroyed by an event referenced in the state of emergency proclamation; and (3) the ADU has been issued construction permits and passed all required inspections. (Gov. Code, § 66328(b).) If these conditions are satisfied, the detached ADU can receive a CofO before the primary dwelling. In all other scenarios, the primary dwelling still needs a CofO before one can be issued for an ADU. AB 462 was enacted as an urgency measure that took effect immediately when signed by the Governor (on October 10, 2025). The following three bills were enacted as non-urgency measures and took effect on January 1, 2026. AB 1154 – JADU Owner-Occupancy; Short-Term Rental When a JADU is developed, existing state law requires a property owner to reside in the JADU or remaining portion of the single-family dwelling. AB 1154 narrows this requirement to now only apply when a JADU shares sanitation facilities (bathroom) with the single-family dwelling. If the JADU has its own bathroom, then the property owner does not have to reside on the property at all. (See amended Gov. Code, § 66333(b).) AB 1154 also expressly prohibits JADUs from being used as short -term rentals (i.e., rented for a term shorter than 30 days). (See amended Gov. Code, § 66333(g).) The City’s ADU ordinance already included this prohibition, but it is now required by state law. SB 9; SB 543 – ADU Ordinance Submittal to HCD; Approval Under existing law, local agencies are required to submit a copy of their ADU ordinance to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) within 60 days of adoption. Last year’s SB 9 and SB 543 created a penalty for failing to do so by rendering null and void any local ordinance that is not submitted to HCD within 60 days of adoption. (See amended Gov. Code, § 66326(d); new Gov. Code, § 66333.5(d).) The bills further spe cify that a local ADU ordinance is null and void if HCD issues findings that the ordinance does not comply with state law and the local agency fails to respond to HCD within 30 days. (Id.) Page 114 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 6 SB 543 – ADU Size; Number of ADUs; Impact Fees; Application Timeline SB 543 makes numerous changes and clarifications to state ADU law, most notably as it pertains to how ADU and JADU size allowances are calculated. ADU & JADU Size Existing state law as well as the current Hermosa Beach ADU ordinance establishes that the maximum size of a JADU may not exceed 500 square feet. It also prohibits enforcement of certain development standards that would have the effect of preventing the development of an ADU that is at least 800 square feet pursuant to Government Code section 66314 through 66322. SB 543 amends state ADU law to specify that the allowable square footage of an ADU or JADU refers to “interior livable space” whereas previously the basis of measurement was left undefined and subject to local interpretation. (See amended Gov. Code, § 66313(d), 66321(b)(2).) Impact Fees Existing law exempts ADUS that are 750 square feet or smaller from development impacts fees (DIFs). SB 543 clarifies that DIFs may not be imposed on an ADU that has 750 or fewer square feet of interior livable space or on a JADU with 500 or fewer square feet of interior livable space. The bill also exempts an ADU or JADU with fewer than 500 square feet of interior livable space from school impact fees. (See amended Gov. Code, § 66311.5.) Quantity of ADUs Created Under Government Code Section 66323 Existing state law creates four categories of ADUs that must be approved if they comply with the limited standards provided in Government Code section 66323(a)(1)–(4). These are: 1. a converted ADU and JADU created on a lot with a proposed or existing single - family dwelling (Gov. Code, § 66323(a)(1)); 2. a detached ADU created on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling (Gov. Code, § 66323(a)(2)); 3. converted ADUs created in an existing multifamily dwelling (Gov. Code, § 66323(a)(3)); and 4. detached ADUs created on a lot with a proposed or existing multifamily dwelling. For some time, there has been uncertainty as to whether ADUs created under Government Code section 66323 could be combined. While the City’s municipal code allows combinations, HCD initially took the position in its 2020 ADU Handbook that state law does not require local agencies to allow combinations. But for the last few years, HCD Page 115 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 6 has taken the opposite position: yes, combinations are permitted. (See HCD January 2025 ADU Handbook, at p.19 [“[Pursuant to Government Code section 66323, subdivision (a), local governments must allow units created pursuant to subparagraphs (1) and (2) together or (3) and (4) together”].) SB 543 codifies HCD’s most recent interpretation by amending Government Code section 66323 to specifically allow combinations. Thus, state law now requires loc al agencies to permit a lot with a multifamily dwelling to have a converted ADU or ADUs created under section 66323(a)(3) and detached ADUs created under section 66323(a)(4), and lot with a single family dwelling to have a converted ADU and a JADU created under section 66323(a)(1) and a detached ADU created under section 66323(a)(2). ADU Permitting Process Existing law has long required local agencies to approve or deny an ADU application within 60 days of receiving a complete application. However, state law was silent with respect to incompleteness determinations, subsequent resubmittals, and appealing local decisions on ADU applications. SB 543 requires local agencies to now: 1. determine whether an ADU application is complete within 15 business days of submittal; 2. if the application is incomplete, within the same 15 days provide the applicant with a list of incomplete items and how to address them; 3. review a resubmitted application for completeness within 15 business days; 4. provide the applicant with a written appeal process for any incompleteness determination or denial (to the Planning Commission or City Council, or both); and 5. provide a final written determination on the appeal within 60 business days of receiving the appeal). (See amended Gov. Code, §§ 66317 [ADUs], 66335 [JADUs].) Discussion & Recommendation: AB 462 took effect immediately when signed, but it technically does not require any change to a local ADU ordinance; the City just needs to follow the new rules for CDP processing and issuance of a CofO, if applicable. The remaining bills took effect on January 1, 2026, and for the City’s ADU ordinance to remain valid and enforceable, it must comply with the new changes in state law. Adopting the proposed ordinance (Attachment 1) ensures that the City’s ADU ordinance would remain in compliance with state law in the manner identified by the letter from the California Department of Housing and Community Development dated December 29, 2025 (Attachment 2). For these reasons, staff, in line with the Planning Commission’s recommendation, recommend that City Council conduct a public hearing to approve an ordinance repealing and replacing Chapter 17.21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code relating to Accessory and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units. Page 116 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 6 of 6 Environmental Determination: Under California Public Resources Code Section 21080.17, CEQA does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county implementing the provisions of Chapter 13 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the California Government Code, which is California’s ADU law. Therefore, the proposed ordinance is statutorily exempt from CEQA because it implements state ADU law. Public Notification: No legal ad is required for the March 24, 2026, meeting to consider the second reading of the ordinance. A legal ad was published in the Easy Reader, a newspaper of general circulation, and posted in three locations in advance of the March 10, 2026 City Council hearing. Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance 2. CA Housing and Community Development Department letter dated Dec 29, 2025 Respectfully Submitted by: Jake Whitney, Associate Planner and Aryan Ray, Intern Concur: Alexis Oropeza, Planning Manager Concur: Alison Becker, AICP, Community Development Director Legal Review: Sarah Locklin, Interim Assistant City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 117 of 1126 Page 1 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 26-XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 17.21 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (CITYWIDE), AND FINDING THE ACTION STATUATORILY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) is authorized to adopt and amend zoning regulations by ordinance pursuant to the California Constitution (Section 7 to Article XI) and California Government Code section 65850; and WHEREAS, the City is required to provide for ministerial approval of an accessory dwelling unit (“ADU”) and junior accessory dwelling unit (“JADU”) pursuant to California Government Code sections 66310 through 66342, and the City is prohibited from enforcement of local ordinances that conflict with state ADU law pursuant to California Government Code section 66326; and WHEREAS, California Government Code sections 66314 through 66324 and 66333 through 66339 establish mandatory processing standards, development standards, and limitations on local discretion applicable to ADUs and JADUs; and WHEREAS, amendments to California ADU law effective January 1, 2026, require conforming updates to local ordinances to maintain compliance with state law; and WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt programs that facilitate and encourage the development of ADUs to meet housing needs identified in the City’s General Plan Housing Element (6th Cycle 2021–2029), adopted by the City Council and certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development , pursuant to California Government Code section 65583(c)(7); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing pursuant to California Government Code section 65090 on January 20, 2026, and recommended adoption of this Ordinance. Page 118 of 1126 Page 2 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. Repeal and Replace. The Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (“HBMC”) Chapter 17.21 is hereby repealed in its entirety and replaced with the zoning text document as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. Finding. The City Council hereby finds that repealing and replacing HBMC Chapter 17.21 ensures consistency with current state law, maintains local standards to the extent authorized, and avoids statutory preemption. SECTION 4. California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The City Council finds that this Ordinance is statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public Resources Code section 21080.17, which provides that CEQA does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance implementing California Government Code sections 66310 through 66342 relating to ADUs. This Ordinance implements state ADU law and does not establish discretionary standards beyond those authorized by statute. Accordingly, no environmental review is required. SECTION 5. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications; and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. SECTION 6. Certification. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City’s book of original ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within fifteen (15) days after the Ordinance’s passage and adoption, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Page 119 of 1126 Page 3 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 24th day of March 2026. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Mike Detoy PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ ________________________________ Ann Yang Jason Baltimore Interim City Clerk Interim City Attorney Page 120 of 1126 Page 4 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX EXHIBIT A CHAPTER 17.21 “ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS” Contents: 17.21.010 Purpose. 17.21.020 Effect of Conforming. 17.21.030 Definitions. 17.21.040 Approval of ADUs and JADUs. 17.21.050 Classes of ADUs and JADUs. 17.21.060 General ADU and JADU Requirements and Development Standards. 17.21.070 Specific ADU Requirements. 17.21.080 Fees. 17.21.090 Nonconforming Zoning Code Conditions, Building Code Violations, and Unpermitted Structures. 17.21.100 Nonconforming ADUs and Discretionary Approval. 17.21.010 Purpose. The purpose of this section is to allow and regulate accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs) in compliance with Chapter 13 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the California Government Code. 17.21.020 Effect of Conforming. An ADU or JADU that conforms to the standards in this section will not be: A. Deemed to be inconsistent with the city’s general plan and zoning designation for the lot on which the ADU or JADU is located. B. Deemed to exceed the allowable density for the lot on which the ADU or JADU is located. C. Considered in the application of any local ordinance, policy, or program to limit residential growth. D. Required to correct a nonconforming zoning condition, as defined in section 17.21.030 below. This does not prevent the city from enforcing compliance with applicable building standards in accordance with Health and Safety Code section 17980.12. 17.21.030 Definitions. As used in this section, terms are defined as follows: Page 121 of 1126 Page 5 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX “Accessory dwelling unit” or “ADU” means an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit that provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing primary residence. An accessory dwelling unit also includes the following: A. An efficiency unit, as defined by section 17958.1 of the California Health and Safety Code; and B. A manufactured home, as defined by section 18007 of the California Health and Safety Code. “Accessory structure” means a structure that is accessory and incidental to a dwelling located on the same lot. “Complete independent living facilities” means permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family or multifamily dwelling is or will be situated. “Efficiency kitchen” means a kitchen that includes all of the following: A. A cooking facility with appliances. B. A food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of a reasonable size in relation to the size of the JADU. “Junior accessory dwelling unit” or “JADU” means a residential unit that satisfies all of the following: A. It is no more than 500 square feet of interior livable space in size. B. It is contained entirely within an existing or proposed single-family structure. An enclosed use within the residence, such as an attached garage, is considered to be a part of and contained within the single-family structure. C. It includes its own separate sanitation facilities or shares sanitation facilities with the existing or proposed single-family structure. D. If the unit does not include its own separate bathroom, then it contains an interior entrance to the main living area of the existing or proposed single-family structure in addition to an exterior entrance that is separate from the main entrance to the primary dwelling. E. It includes an efficiency kitchen, as defined in section 17.21.030. “Livable space” means a space in a dwelling intended for human habitation, including living, sleeping, eating, cooking, or sanitation. Page 122 of 1126 Page 6 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX “Living area” means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit, including basements and attics, but does not include a garage or any accessory structure. “Nonconforming zoning condition” means a physical improvement on a property that does not conform with current zoning standards. “Passageway” means a pathway that is unobstructed clear to the sky and extends from a street to one entrance of the ADU or JADU. “Proposed dwelling” means a dwelling that is the subject of a permit application and that meets the requirements for permitting. “Public transit” means a location, including, but not limited to, a bus stop or train station, where the public may access buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, run on fixed routes, and are available to the public. “Tandem parking” means that two or more automobiles are parked on a driveway or in any other location on a lot, lined up behind one another. 17.21.040 Approval of ADUs and JADUs. The following approvals apply to ADUs and JADUs created under this section: A. Ministerial ADU and Building Permits Required. Every ADU and JADU requires an ADU permit and a building permit. The city will review and approve permit applications in accordance with subsection 17.21.040(C) below. B. Processing Fee. The city may charge a fee to reimburse it for costs incurred in processing ADU permits, including the costs of adopting or amending the city’s ADU ordinance. The ADU-permit processing fee is determined by the city council by resolution. C. Process and Timing. 1. Completeness. a) Determination in 15 days. The city will determine whether an application to create or serve an ADU or JADU is complete and will provide written notice of the determination to the applicant within 15 business days after the city receives the application submittal. b) Incomplete items. If the city’s determination under subsection (C)(1)(a) above is that the application is incomplete, the city’s notice must list the incomplete items and describe how the application can be made complete. Page 123 of 1126 Page 7 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX c) Cure. After receiving a notice that the application is incomplete, the applicant may cure and address the items that were deemed by the city to be incomplete. d) Subsequent submittals. If the applicant submits additional information to address incomplete items, within 15 business days of the subsequent submittal the city will determine in writing whether the additional information remedies all the incomplete items that the city identified in its original notice. The city may not require the application to include an item that was not included in the original notice. e) Deemed complete. If the city does not make a timely determination as required by this subsection (C), the application or resubmitted application is deemed complete for the purposes of subsection (C)(3) below. f) Appeal of incompleteness. An applicant may appeal the city’s determination that the application is incomplete by submitting a written appeal to the city clerk. The planning commission will review the written appeal and affirm or reverse the completeness determination and provide a final written determination to the applicant within 60 business days after receipt of the appeal. 2. No discretion or hearing. Ministerial permits for an ADU or JADU are considered and approved without discretionary review or a hearing. 3. Deadline to approve or deny ministerial approvals. The city must approve or deny an application to create an ADU or JADU within 60 days from the date that the city receives a complete application. If the city has not approved or denied the complete application within 60 days, the application is deemed approved unless either: a) The applicant requests a delay, in which case the 60-day time period is tolled for the period of the requested delay, or b) When an application to create an ADU or JADU is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family or multifamily dwelling on the lot, the city may delay acting on the permit application for the ADU or JADU until the city acts on the permit application to create the new single-family or multifamily dwelling, but the application to create the ADU or JADU will still be considered ministerially without discretionary review or a hearing. 4. Denial. If the city denies an application to create an ADU or JADU, the city must provide the applicant with comments that include, among other things, a list of all the defective or deficient items and a description of how the application may be remedied by the applicant. Notice of the denial and Page 124 of 1126 Page 8 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX corresponding comments must be provided to the applicant within the 60-day time period established by subsection (C)(3) above. 5. Appeal of denial. An applicant may appeal the city’s denial of the application by submitting a written appeal to the city clerk. The planning commission will review the written appeal and affirm or reverse the denial and provide a final written determination to the applicant within 60 business days after receipt of the appeal. 6. Deadline to approve or deny CDP. Nothing in state ADU and JADU laws or this code supersedes or in any way alters or lessens the effect or application of the California Coastal Act of 1976, except that: a) If a coastal development permit (CDP) is required for the ADU or JADU, a complete CDP application must be included for the ADU or JADU application to be complete; and b) The CDP application must be approved or denied within 60 days of receiving the complete application. c) If the city does not have a certified local coastal plan or program when the complete ADU or JADU application is received, the city will immediately notify the California Coastal Commission of the complete ADU or JADU application. 7. Concurrent review of demolition. A demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU is reviewed with the application for the ADU and issued at the same time. 17.21.050 Classes of ADUs and JADUs. A. Class 1: Statutorily Regulated. Class 1 ADUs and JADUs are approved under Government Code section 66323. If an ADU or JADU complies with each of the general requirements in section 17.21.060 below, it is allowed in each of the scenarios provided in this subsection (A). An ADU and JADU approved under subsection (A)(1) may be combined with an ADU approved under subsection (A)(2), and ADUs approved under subsection (A)(3) may be combined with ADUs approved under subsection (A)(4). 1. Converted on Lot with Single-Family: One ADU as described in this subsection (A)(1) and one JADU on a lot with a proposed or existing single- family dwelling on it, where the ADU or JADU: a) Is either: within the space of a proposed single-family dwelling; within the existing space of an existing single-family dwelling; or (in the case of an ADU only) within the existing space of an accessory structure, plus up to 150 additional square feet if the expansion is limited to accommodating ingress and egress; and Page 125 of 1126 Page 9 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX b) Has exterior access that is independent of that for the single-family dwelling; and c) Has side and rear setbacks sufficient for fire and safety, as dictated by applicable building and fire codes. d) The JADU complies with the requirements of Government Code sections 66333 through 66339. 2. Limited Detached on Lot with Single-Family: One detached, new- construction ADU on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling, if the detached ADU satisfies each of the following limitations: a) The side- and rear-yard setbacks are at least four feet. b) The total floor area is 800 square feet of livable space or smaller. c) The peak height above grade does not exceed the applicable height limit in section 17.21.060 below. 3. Converted on Lot with Multifamily: One or more ADUs within portions of existing multifamily dwelling structures that are not used as livable space, including but not limited to storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, if each converted ADU complies with state building standards for dwellings. Under this subsection (A)(3), at least one converted ADU is allowed within an existing multifamily dwelling, up to a quantity equal to 25 percent of the existing multifamily dwelling units. 4. Limited Detached on Lot with Multifamily: No more than two detached ADUs on a lot with a proposed multifamily dwelling, or up to eight detached ADUs on a lot with an existing multifamily dwelling, if each detached ADU satisfies all of the following: a) The side- and rear-yard setbacks are at least four feet. If the existing multifamily dwelling has a rear or side yard setback of less than four feet, the city will not require any modification to the multifamily dwelling as a condition of approving the ADU. b) The peak height above grade does not exceed the applicable height limit provided in subsection 17.21.060(B) below. c) If the lot has an existing multifamily dwelling, the quantity of detached ADUs does not exceed the number of primary dwelling units on the lot. B. Class 2: Locally Regulated. Class 2 ADUs are approved under Government Code sections 66314–66322. Except for Class 1 ADUs approved under subsection (A) above, all ADUs are subject to the standards set forth in sections 17.21.060 and 17.21.070 below. Page 126 of 1126 Page 10 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX 17.21.060 General ADU and JADU Requirements and Development Standards. The following requirements apply to all Class 1 and Class 2 ADUs and JADUs: A. Zoning. 1. A Class 1 ADU approved under subsection 17.21.050(A) above may be created on a lot in a residential or mixed-use zone. 2. A Class 2 ADU approved under subsection 17.21.050(B) above may be created on a lot that is zoned to allow single-family dwelling residential use or multifamily dwelling residential use. 3. In accordance with Government Code section 66333(a), a JADU may only be created on a lot zoned for single-family residences. B. Height. 1. Except as otherwise provided by subsections (B)(2) and (B)(3) below, a detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit may not exceed 16 feet in height. 2. A detached ADU may be up to 18 feet in height if it is created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is located within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, and the ADU may be up to two additional feet in height (for a maximum of 20 feet) if necessary to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit. 3. A detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling that has more than one story above grade may not exceed 18 feet in height. 4. An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed 25 feet i n height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower. Notwithstanding the foregoing, ADUs subject to this subsection (B)(4) may not exceed two stories. 5. For purposes of this subsection (B), height is measured from existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor, whichever is lower, to the peak of the structure. Page 127 of 1126 Page 11 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX C. Fire Sprinklers. 1. Fire sprinklers are required in an ADU or JADU if sprinklers are required in the primary residence. 2. The construction of an ADU or JADU does not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling. D. Rental Term. No ADU or JADU may be rented for a term that is shorter than 30 days. This prohibition applies regardless of when the ADU or JADU was created. E. No Separate Conveyance. An ADU or JADU may be rented, but, except as otherwise provided in Government Code section 66341, no ADU or JADU may be sold or otherwise conveyed separately from the lot and the primary dwellin g (in the case of a single-family lot) or from the lot and all of the dwellings (in the case of a multifamily lot). F. Septic System. If the ADU or JADU will connect to an onsite wastewater-treatment system, the owner must include with the application a percolation test completed within the last five years or, if the percolation test has been recertified, within the last 10 years. G. Owner Occupancy. 1. ADUs. ADUs are not subject to an owner-occupancy requirement. 2. JADUs. a) Generally. As required by state law, JADUs are generally subject to an owner-occupancy requirement. A natural person with legal or equitable title to the property must reside on the property, in either the primary dwelling or JADU, as the person’s legal domicile and permanent residence. b) Exceptions. The owner-occupancy requirement in this subsection (G)(2) does not apply in either of the following situations: (I) The JADU has separate sanitation facilities (i.e., does not share sanitation facilities with the existing primary dwelling unit structure). (II) The property is entirely owned by another governmental agency, land trust, or housing organization. H. Deed Restriction. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for an JADU, a deed restriction must be recorded against the title of the property in the County Recorder’s office and a copy filed with the community development director. The deed restriction must run with the land and bind all future owners. The form of the deed restriction will be provided by the city and must provide that: Page 128 of 1126 Page 12 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX 1. The JADU may not be sold separately from the primary dwelling. 2. The JADU is restricted to the approved size and to other attributes allowed by this section. 3. The deed restriction runs with the land and may be enforced against future property owners. 4. The deed restriction may be removed if the owner eliminates the JADU, as evidenced by, for example, removal of the kitchen facilities. To remove the deed restriction, an owner may make a written request of the Director, providing evidence that the JADU has in fact been eliminated. The Director may then determine whether the evidence supports the claim that the JADU has been eliminated. Appeal may be taken from the Director’s determination consistent with other provisions of this Code. If the JADU is not entirely physicall y removed, but is only eliminated by virtue of having a necessary component of an JADU removed, the remaining structure and improvements must otherwise comply with applicable provisions of this Code. 5. The deed restriction is enforceable by the director or his or her designee for the benefit of the city. Failure of the property owner to comply with the deed restriction may result in legal action against the property owner, and the city is authorized to obtain any remedy available to it at law or equity, including, but not limited to, obtaining an injunction enjoining the use of the JADU in violation of the recorded restrictions or abatement of the illegal unit. I. Building & Safety. 1. Must comply with building code. Subject to subsection (I)(2) below, all ADUs and JADUs must comply with all local building code requirements. 2. No change of occupancy. Construction of an ADU does not constitute a Group R occupancy change under the local building code, as described in Section 310 of the California Building Code, unless the Building Official makes a written finding based on substantial evidence in the record that the construction of the ADU could have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety. Nothing in this section prevents the city from changing the occupancy code of a space that was uninhabitable space or that was only permitted for nonresidential use and was subsequently converted for residential use in accordance with this section. J. Certificate of Occupancy Timing. 1. Generally. No certificate of occupancy for an ADU or JADU may be issued before the certificate of occupancy is issued for the primary dwelling unit. 2. Limited Exception for State-declared Emergencies. Notwithstanding subsection (J)(1) above, a certificate of occupancy for an ADU may be issued Page 129 of 1126 Page 13 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX before a certificate of occupancy for the primary dwelling if each of the following requirements are met: a) The county is subject to a proclamation of a state of emergency made by the California Governor on or after February 1, 2025. b) The primary dwelling was substantially damaged or destroyed by an event referenced in the Governor’s state of emergency proclamation. c) The ADU has been issued construction permits and has passed all required inspections. d) The ADU is not attached to the primary dwelling. 17.21.070 Specific ADU Requirements. The following requirements apply only to Class 2 ADUs approved under subsection 17.21.050(B) above. This section does not apply to Class 1 ADUs or JADUs approved under subsection 17.21.050(A) above. A. Maximum Size. 1. The maximum size of a detached or attached ADU subject to this section is 850 square feet of interior livable space for a studio or one-bedroom unit and 1,000 square feet of interior livable space for a unit with two or more bedrooms. 2. An attached ADU that is created on a lot with an existing primary dwelling is further limited to 50 percent of the floor area of the existing primary dwelling. 3. Application of other development standards in this section 17.21.070, such as FAR, minimum lot size, or lot coverage, might further limit the size of the ADU, but no application of the percent -based size limit in subsection (A)(2) above or of an FAR, front setback, minimum lot size, lot coverage limit, or open-space requirement may require the ADU have less than 800 square feet of interior livable space. B. Floor Area Ratio (FAR). No ADU subject to this section may cause the total FAR of the lot to exceed 50 percent, subject to subsection (A)(3) above. C. Setbacks. 1. ADUs that are subject to this section must conform to 4-foot side and rear setbacks. ADUs that are subject to this section must conform to 25-foot front setbacks, subject to subsection (A)(3) above. 2. No setback is required for an ADU that is subject to this section if the ADU is constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. Page 130 of 1126 Page 14 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX D. Lot Coverage. No ADU subject to this section may cause the total lot coverage of the lot to exceed whatever applicable standard exists based on the zone in which it is was located subject to subsection (A)(3) above. E. Minimum Open Space. Unless restricted pursuant to other state or local law, the property in which the ADU is located upon shall comply with the open space requirements of the base zone in which it is located subject to subsection (A)(3) above. F. Passageway. No passageway, as defined by section 17.21.030 above, is required for an ADU. G. Parking. 1. Generally. One off-street parking space is required for each ADU or bedroom, whichever is less. The parking space may be provided in setback areas or as tandem parking, as defined by section 17.21.030 above. 2. Exceptions. No parking under subsection (G)(1) is required in the following situations: a) The ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit, as defined in section 17.21.030 above. b) The ADU is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district. c) The ADU is part of the proposed or existing primary residence or an accessory structure. d) When on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the ADU. e) When there is an established car share vehicle stop located within one block of the ADU. f) When the permit application to create an ADU is submitted with an application to create a new single-family or new multifamily dwelling on the same lot, provided that the ADU or the lot satisfies any other criteria listed in subsections (G)(2)(c) through (e) above. 3. No Replacement. When a garage, carport, covered parking structure, or uncovered parking space is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an ADU or converted to an ADU, those off-street parking spaces are not required to be replaced. Page 131 of 1126 Page 15 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX H. Architectural Requirements. 1. The materials and colors of the exterior walls, roof, and windows and doors must be the same as those of the primary dwelling. 2. The roof slope must match that of the dominant roof slope of the primary dwelling. The dominant roof slope is the slope shared by the largest portion of the roof. 3. The exterior lighting must be limited to down-lights or as otherwise required by the building or fire code. 4. The ADU must have an independent exterior entrance, apart from that of the primary dwelling. 5. The interior horizontal dimensions of an ADU must be at least 10 feet wide in every direction, with a minimum interior wall height of seven feet. 6. No window or door of the ADU may have a direct line of sight to an adjoining residential property. Each window and door must either be located where there is no direct line of sight or screened using fencing, landscaping, or privacy glass to prevent a direct line of sight. 7. All windows and doors in an ADU less than 30 feet from a property line that is not a public right-of-way line must either be (for windows) clerestory with the bottom of the glass at least six feet above the finished floor, or (for windows and for doors) utilize frosted or obscure glass. 8. Architectural requirements defined in this subsection shall not preclude any unit subject to Government Code section 66323. I. Landscape Requirements. Evergreen landscape screening must be planted and maintained between the ADU and adjacent parcels as follows: 1. At least one 15-gallon size plant must be provided for every five linear feet of exterior ADU wall. Alternatively, at least one 24” box size plant must be provided for every ten linear feet of exterior ADU wall. 2. Plant specimens must be at least six feet tall when installed. As an alternative, a solid fence of at least six feet in height may be installed. 3. All landscaping must be drought-tolerant. 4. All landscaping must be from the city’s approved plant list. 5. Landscape requirements defined in this subsection shall not preclude any unit subject to Government Code section 66323. Page 132 of 1126 Page 16 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX J. Historical Protections. An ADU that is on or within 600 feet of real property that is listed in the California Register of Historic Resources must be located so as to not be visible from any public right-of-way. K. Allowed Stories. No ADU subject to this section may have more than one story, except that an ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may have the stories allowed under subsection 17.21.060(B) of this section. 17.21.080 Fees. The following requirements apply to all Class 1 ADUs and JADUs and Class 2 ADUs that are approved under section 17.21.060 above. A. Impact Fees. 1. No impact fee is required for a JADU or for an ADU that has less than 750 square feet of interior livable space. For purposes of this section, “impact fee” means a “fee” under the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code § 66000(b)) and a fee under the Quimby Act (Gov. Code § 66477). “Impact fee” here does not include any connection fee or capacity charge for water or sewer service. 2. A JADU or ADU with less than 500 square feet of interior livable space does not increase assessable space by 500 square feet for purposes of Education Code section 17620(a)(1)(C), and is therefore not subject to school fees under Education Code section 17620. 3. Any impact fee that is required for an ADU that has 750 square feet or more of interior livable space must be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. (E.g., the floor area of the ADU, divided by the floor area of the primary dwelling, times the typical fee amount charged for a new dwelling.) B. Utility Fees. 1. If an ADU or JADU is constructed with a new single-family home, a separate utility connection directly between the ADU or JADU and the utility and payment of the normal connection fee and capacity charge for a new dwelling are required. 2. Except as described in subsection (B)(1), JADUs and converted ADUs on a single-family lot that are created under subsection 17.21.050(A)(1) above are not required to have a new or separate utility connection directly between the JADU or ADU and the utility. Nor is a connection fee or capacity charge required. Notwithstanding the rest of this paragraph, a direct utility connection is required for separate conveyance of an ADU when separate conveyance is allowed under this code. Page 133 of 1126 Page 17 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX 3. Except as described in subsection (B)(1), all ADUs that are not covered by subsection (B)(2) require a new, separate utility connection directly between the ADU and the utility for any utility that is provided by the city. All utilities that are not provided by the city are subject to the connection and fee requirements of the utility provider. a) The connection is subject to a connection fee or capacity charge that is proportionate to the burden created by the ADU based on either the floor area or the number of drainage-fixture units (DFU) values, as defined by the Uniform Plumbing Code, upon the water or sewer system. b) The portion of the fee or charge that is charged by the city may not exceed the reasonable cost of providing this service. 17.21.090 Nonconforming Zoning Code Conditions, Building Code Violations, and Unpermitted Structures. A. Generally. The city will not deny an ADU or JADU application due to a nonconforming zoning condition, building code violation, or unpermitted structure on the lot that does not present a threat to the public health and safety and that is not affected by the construction of the ADU or JADU. B. Unpermitted ADUs and JADUs constructed before 2020. 1. Permit to Legalize. As required by state law, the city may not deny a permit to legalize an existing but unpermitted ADU or JADU that was constructed before January 1, 2020, if denial is based on either of the following grounds: a) The ADU or JADU violates applicable building standards, or b) The ADU or JADU does not comply with state ADU or JADU law or this ADU ordinance, Chapter 17.21. 2. Exceptions: a) Notwithstanding subsection (B)(1) above, the city may deny a permit to legalize an existing but unpermitted ADU or JADU that was constructed before January 1, 2020, if the city makes a finding that correcting a violation is necessary to comply with the standards specified in California Health and Safety Code section 17920.3. b) Subsection (B)(2)(a) above does not apply to a building that is deemed to be substandard in accordance with California Health and Safety Code section 17920.3. 17.21.100 Nonconforming ADUs and Discretionary Approval. Page 134 of 1126 Page 18 of 18 ORD NO. 26-XXXX Any proposed ADU or JADU that would otherwise be allowed under this Chapter but that does not conform to the objective design or development standards set forth in sections 17.21.010 through 17.21.090 of this section may be allowed by the city with a conditional use permit, in accordance with the other provisions of this title. Page 135 of 1126 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT 651 Bannon Street, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95811 (916)263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453 www.hcd.ca.gov December 29, 2025 Alexis Oropeza, Planning Manager Community Development City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Alexis Oropeza: RE: Review of Hermosa Beach’s Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance under State ADU Law (Gov. Code, §§ 66310 - 66342) Thank you for submitting the City of Hermosa Beach (City) ADU Ordinance No. 1484 (Ordinance), adopted January 28, 2025, to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). HCD has reviewed the Ordinance and submits these written findings pursuant to Government Code section 66326, subdivision (a). HCD finds that the Ordinance fails to comply with State ADU Laws in the manner noted below. Pursuant to Government Code section 66326, subdivision (b)(1), the City has up to 30 days to respond to these findings. Accordingly, the City must provide a written response to these findings no later than January 30, 2026 with a plan to either amend the current ordinance or adopt a resolution with findings.1 Responses should be submitted formally on agency letterhead. The Ordinance addresses many statutory requirements; however, HCD finds that the Ordinance does not comply with State ADU Law as follows: 1.Please note, there is recent legislation that amended State ADU Law. Language relevant to these changes should be incorporated into the Ordinance as it is updated. The bills referenced below are relevant to State ADU Law: •Assembly Bill (AB) 130 – Effective June 30, 2025 •AB 462 – Effective October 10, 2025 •AB 1154 – Effective January 1, 2026 •Senate Bill (SB) 9 – Effective January 1, 2026 •SB 543 – Effective January 1, 2026 1 Gov. Code, § 66326, subd. (b)(2)(B). Page 136 of 1126 Alexis Oropeza, Planning Manager Page 2 2. Section 17.21.030 (A)(1) – Unit Allowances – The Ordinance allows “One ADU as described in this subsection (A) (1) and one JADU (or a second ADU in lieu of the JADU) on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling on it, where the ADU or JADU (or a second ADU in lieu of the JADU)…” Thus, the City limits ADU and JADU development to no more than two units on a lot with a single-family primary dwelling. However, Government Code section 66323, subdivision (a), states, “Notwithstanding Sections 66314 to 66322, inclusive, a local agency shall ministerially approve an application for a building permit within a residential or mixed-use zone to create any of the following: (1) One accessory dwelling unit and one junior accessory dwelling unit per lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling…(A) The accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit is within the proposed space of a single-family dwelling or existing space of a single-family dwelling or accessory structure.” Paragraph (2) permits “[o]ne detached, new construction, accessory dwelling unit that does not exceed four-foot side and rear yard setbacks.” The use of the term “any combination” followed by an enumeration of ADU types permitted under Government Code section 66323 means that any of these ADU types can be combined on a lot zoned for single-family dwellings. This permits a homeowner, who meets specified requirements, to create one converted ADU; one detached, new construction ADU; and one junior accessory dwelling (JADU). Thus, if the local agency approves an ADU that is created from existing (or proposed) space, and the owner subsequently applies for a detached ADU (or vice versa) that meets the size and setbacks pursuant to the subdivision, the local agency cannot deny the application, nor deny a permit for a JADU under this section. Additionally, these allowances reflect only the units and formats described in Government Code section 66323, subdivision (a). Units created subject to Government Code section 66314 must also be reflected in the Ordinance to enable maximum unit allowances. In summary, the City must amend the Ordinance to specifically include units subject to Government Code section 66314 as well as all combinations required by section 66323. 3. Section 17.21.030 (F)(2) – JADU Owner Occupancy – The Ordinance states, “As required by state law, all JADUs are subject to an owner-occupancy requirement. A natural person with legal or equitable title to the property must reside on the property, in either the primary dwelling or JADU, as the person's legal domicile and permanent residence.” However, Government Code section 66333, subdivision (b) was changed as of January 1, 2026 to require owner occupancy only “…If the junior accessory dwelling unit has shared sanitation facilities with the existing structure.” The City must amend the Ordinance to match current State JADU Law. Page 137 of 1126 Alexis Oropeza, Planning Manager Page 3 4. Section 17.21.030 (G) – Deed Restriction – The Ordinance requires a deed restriction for ADUs. However, a deed restriction cannot be imposed on an ADU. Government Code section 66315 states, “No additional standards, other than those provided in Section 66314, shall be used or imposed, including an owner occupant requirement, except that a local agency may require that the property may be used for rentals of terms 30 days or longer.” Although deed restrictions are required for JADUs, they are prohibited for ADUs2. The City must amend the Ordinance to remove the deed requirement for an ADU. 5. Section 17.21.050 (A)(3) – Size Exceptions – The Ordinance states, “Application of other development standards in this section or any other section, might further limit the size of the ADU, but no application of the percent-based size limit in this section or other section or front setback, lot coverage limit, or open-space requirement may require the ADU to be less than 800 square feet.” This is an incomplete recreation of the exceptions required in Government Code section 66321, subdivision (b)(3); the City must add floor area ratio and minimum lot size as two other conditions that may not restrict a unit to be below 800 square feet to come into consistency with State ADU Law. 6. Section 17.21.050 (G) – Architectural Requirements – The Ordinance lists several architectural requirements to apply to ADUs; however, such requirements may not preclude any unit subject to Government Code section 66323. The City must note the exception. The City has two options in response to this letter.3 The City can either 1) amend the Ordinance to comply with State ADU Law4 or 2) adopt the Ordinance without changes and include findings in its resolution accompanying the Ordinance that explain the reasons the City believes that the Ordinance complies with State ADU Law despite HCD’s findings.5 If the City fails to take either course of action, or if HCD finds that the newly adopted Ordinance remains out of compliance with State ADU Law despite the City ‘s findings and explanations, HCD must notify the City and may notify the California Office of the Attorney General that the City is in violation of State ADU Law.6 2 Local jurisdictions should eliminate all ADU and JADU deed restrictions unless expressly authorized by statute. Deed restrictions unnecessarily “lock in” current state and local requirements, even as the Legislature continues to update ADU and JADU statutes. 3 Gov. Code, § 66326, subd. (c)(1). 4 Gov. Code, § 66326, subd. (b)(2)(A). 5 Gov. Code, § 66326, subd. (b)(2)(B). 6 Gov. Code, § 66326, subd. (c)(1). Page 138 of 1126 Alexis Oropeza, Planning Manager Page 4 HCD appreciates the City‘s efforts in the preparation and adoption of the Ordinance and welcomes the opportunity to assist the City in fully complying with State ADU Law. Please feel free to contact Mike VanGorder at Mike.vangorder@hcd.ca.gov if you have any questions or wish to discuss any of HCD’s findings. Sincerely, Jamie Candelaria Section Chief, ADU Policy Housing Accountability Unit Page 139 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-CDD-037 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council APPROVE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH IK CONSULTING, LLC TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WITH THE ACCELA CIVIC PLATFORM SOFTWARE (Community Development Director Alison Becker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Approve the proposed fourth amendment to an agreement with IK Consulting, LLC to provide ongoing technical assistance with the Accela Civic platform to increase the not-to-exceed amount by $23,000, resulting in a total not-to-exceed amount of $82,725 (Attachment 1); 2. Appropriate $23,000 from Records Technology Fees reserved in the Equipment Replacement Fund for the fourth amendment; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest the attached fourth amendment (or similar in substance), subject to modification and approval by the City Attorney. Executive Summary: The Community Development Department utilizes the technical assistance of a third -party firm to support the Accela Civic Platform. On May 13, 2021, the City entered into an agreement with IK Consulting LLC to provide configuration service needed to support implementation of the new permitting software (Attachment 2). The City has processed three amendments to the agreement to extend the expiration date resulting in an amended expiration date of June 30, 2026 (Attachments 3, 4, and 5). In order to continue to configure the digital permitting platform to meet operational needs, staff recommends approval of the fourth amendment to an agreement with IK Consulting LLC. The proposed fourth amendment would increase the not-to-exceed compensation by $23,000 for a total not-to-exceed amount of $82,725. The existing contract with IK Consulting is set to expire in June 2026. Background: The Accela Civic Platform is a digital permitting system designed to streamline the permitting process. Since 2021, the City has contracted with IK Consulting, LLC for services related to configuring and improving the Accela Civic Platform. IK Consulting, Page 140 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 3 LLC specializes in configuration for the Accela Civic Platform Software and assists many public agencies throughout the country. Like many smaller jurisdictions, the City does not have the personnel to perform the services required to manage and configure a digital permitting platform. Discussion: To continue improving the City’s permitting software, which serves residents, businesses, and the development community, the City must ensure that sufficient technology expertise is available. The services provided by IK Consulting, LLC ensure the successful configuration of the Accela Civic Platform Software. IK Consulting, LLC’s services would continue to include the design, development, data conversion, reporting, training, system integrations, ongoing support, and administration of the permitting software. Professional services to provide technical assistance with the Accela Civic Platform is an ongoing need and IK Consulting, LLC has demonstrated the technical expertise, available staffing, and competitive pricing to continue to assist the City. The proposed increase to the not-to-exceed limit would provide the necessary resources to continue the ongoing configuration of the Accela Civic Platform. As the effort is at a crucial point in development, additional funding is needed to avoid halting the project because the last funding allocation has been exhausted. Staff requests the proposed fourth amendment to an agreement with IK Consulting, LLC to increase the not-to-exceed compensation by $23,000, resulting in a total not-to-exceed amount of $82,725. At the current service utilization rate, the requested contract augmentation would allow the department to utilize IK Consulting, LLC’s professional services for the remaining term of the contract, which would expire on June 30, 2026. Options for Council Consideration: Option 1: Approve staff’s recommended action and increase contract funding for IK Consulting, LLC in support of the Accela Civic Platform development, or Option 2: Do not approve staff’s recommended action and decline additional funding for the Accela Civic Platform. Fiscal Impact: If approved, the proposed fourth amendment to this agreement would increase the not - to-exceed limit for IK Consulting, LLC by $23,000 for a revised total of $82,725 for the remainder of the extended contract term ending June 30, 2026. The Department has available Records Technology Fees reserved in the Equipment Replacement Fund to fund the agreement amendment. Page 141 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 3 Agreement Modification Request Agreement Current Authorized Amount Modified Request Amount FY 2025-2026 Budget Dept. Account # Total Revised Contract Amount IK Consulting, LLC $59,725 $23,000 715-4201-4201 $82,725 Attachments: 1. Proposed Fourth Amendment to Agreement with IK Consulting, LLC 2. Agreement with IK Consulting, LLC 3. First Amendment to Agreement with IK Consulting, LLC 4. Second Amendment to Agreement with IK Consulting, LLC 5. Third Amendment to Agreement with IK Consulting, LLC Respectfully Submitted by: Alison Becker, Community Development Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 142 of 1126 65270.00001\44524032.1 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND IK CONSULTING, LLC This Fourth Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement (“Amendment No. 4”) is made and entered into as of March 24, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Hermosa Beach (a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254) (“City”) and IK Consulting (a limited liability corporation with its principal place of business at PO Box 17661, Tucson, Arizona 85731) (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are hereinafter sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. RECITALS A. The Parties entered an agreement dated May 13, 2021(“Agreement”), for Consultant to provide as needed Accela Civic Platform Consulting services (“Services”); and B. The Parties amended the Agreement on July 1, 2022, to extend the term for an additional year; and C. The Parties amended the Agreement a second time on May 24, 2023, to extend the term for an additional year; and D. The Parties amended the Agreement a third time to increase the not-to- exceed (“NTE”) limit by $30,000 (for a total NTE amount of $59,725) and to extend the term for an additional two years (set to expire on June 30, 2026); and E. The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement a fourth time in order to increase the NTE limit by $23,000 (for a new total NTE amount of $82,725) for the continued performance of the Services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties mutually agree as follows: AGREEMENT Page 143 of 1126 BBK (2026) Page 2 of 3 FOURTH AMENDMENT 65270.00021\44443112.1 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals listed above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Amendment. Section 1 (Consideration and Compensation) of the Agreement as amended is hereby further revised by replacing the NTE amount “$59,725” with the NTE amount “$82,725”. 3. Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 4, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect; and shall govern the actions of the Parties under this Amendment No. 4 Whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the original Agreement from and after the date of this Amendment No. 4, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 4. 4. Electronic Transmission. A manually signed copy of this Amendment No. 4 which is transmitted by facsimile, electronic mail, or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this Amendment No. 4 for all purposes. This Amendment No. 4 may be signed using an electronic signature. 5. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 4 may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 4 on the Effective Date. Page 144 of 1126 BBK (2026) Page 3 of 3 FOURTH AMENDMENT 65270.00021\44443112.1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVED BY: Steve Napolitano City Manager ATTESTED BY: Ann Yang Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jason Baltimore Interim City Attorney IK CONSULTING, LLC Melissa O. Kern Managing Partner Page 145 of 1126 65270.00001\44524032.1 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 AMENDMENT NO. FOUR TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE AS NEEDED ACCELA CIVIC PLATFORM CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND IK CONSULTING, LLC This Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement for Professional Services to provide as needed Accela Civic Platform Consulting Services (“Amendment No.4]”) is made and entered into as of March 24, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Hermosa Beach (a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254) (“City”) and IK Consulting (a limited liability corporation with its principal place of business in Tuscon, AZ) (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are hereinafter sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. Recitals A. The Parties entered an agreement dated May 13, 2021(“Agreement”), for Consultant to provide as needed Accela Civic Platform Consulting services (“Services”); and B. The Parties amended the Agreement on July 1, 2022 to extend the agreement for an additional year; and C. The Parties then amended the Agreement on May 24, 2023 to extend the agreement for an additional year; and D. The Parties then amended the Agreement to increase the not-to- exceed limit by $30,000, for a total not-to-exceed amount of $59,725, and to extend the agreement for an additional two years which is set to expire on June 30, 2026; and E. The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement in order to increase the not- to-exceed limit by $23,000 for a new total not-to-exceed amount of $82,725 for the continued performance of the Services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties mutually agree as follows: Page 146 of 1126 65270.00001\44524032.1 BBK (2026) Page 2 of 3 AMENDMENT NO. 4 65270.00021\44443112.1 AGREEMENT 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals listed above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Amendment. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows: a. CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION. Section 1 is amended to read as follows: As partial consideration, Consultant agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as EXHIBIT A. As additional consideration, Consultant and City agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. As additional consideration, City agrees to pay Consultant a total not-to-exceed amount of $82, 725, for Consultant’s services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. Consultant shall submit to City, by no later than the 10th day of each month, its invoice for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous month. City shall pay Consultant all uncontested amount set for in Consultant’s invoice within 30 days after it is received. 3. Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 4, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect; and shall govern the actions of the Parties under this Amendment No.4 Whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the original Agreement from and after the date of this Amendment No. 4, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 4. 4. Electronic Transmission. A manually signed copy of this Amendment No. 4 which is transmitted by facsimile, electronic mail, or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this Amendment No. 4 for all purposes. This Amendment No. 4 may be signed using an electronic signature. Page 147 of 1126 65270.00001\44524032.1 BBK (2026) Page 3 of 3 AMENDMENT NO. 4 65270.00021\44443112.1 5. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 4 may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 4 on the Effective Date. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVED BY: Steve Napolitano City Manager ATTESTED BY: Ann Yang Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jason Baltimore Interim City Attorney IK CONSULTING, LLC Melissa O. Kern Managing Partner Page 148 of 1126 IK CONSULTING, LLC SCOPE OF SERVICES EXHIBIT A Consulting Services Off Site or On Site Assistance – Hourly $145.00 / Hour • Project work for modifications to existing and new process creation, as assigned. 1. Workflow / Process. 2. Fees / Calculations. 3. User Setup / Security. 4. Custom Forms / Fields Layout. 5. User Defined Data / Tables. 6. Intake Forms / Status Groups. 7. Inspections / Result Groups. 8. Calendars / Events / Scheduling. 9. Accela add on products (such as Accela Citizen Access, Accela Mobile Office, Apps, etc). 10. Accela integrations and implementations for add on products (such as Solar App+, Bluebeam, Laserfiche, Finance Products, etc.) 11. Queries / Filters / Smart Charts. 12. Custom Reports / Ad Hoc Reports. 13. Events / Scripting. • Support tickets, as assigned. • Training documentation, as assigned. Training – Daily $1,740.00 / Day • End User and/or Administrative Training for the Civic Platform or add on products, as assigned. Not To Exceed Amount $59,725.00 Note: This is a time and materials quote and client will be billed based on hours actually worked. All work to be completed based on request, and expenses to be reimbursed, as incurred. PAYMENT TERMS Payment for Consulting will be invoiced monthly for work completed the previous month. Training will be invoiced at time of scheduling classes. IK Consulting, LLC expects payment to occur within 30 days of receipt of invoice unless otherwise agreed to. Sales Tax or any other applicable taxes are not included in any of this proposal's pricing information. If Sales tax or any other tax becomes applicable, these taxes will then need to be added to the proposed pricing. Quote valid for 90 days from date of quote. February 22, 2021 Hermosa Beach, CA Page 1 Confidential & Proprietary to IK Consulting, LLC. PO Box 17661 • Tucson, AZ 85731 • Voice: (520) 891-5376 • Fax: (520) 733-6282 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7B0CB0A0-C5B6-41E8-920B-342D3E7AA7E4 Page 149 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Page 1 of 9 CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE AS NEEDED ACCELA CIVIC PLATFORM CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND IK CONSULTING, LLC This AGREEMENT is entered into this 13th day of May 2021, by and between the CITY OF Hermosa Beach, a general law city a municipal corporation (“CITY”) and IK Consulting, LLC, a limited liability company (“CONSULTANT”). R E C I T A L S A. The City desires to receive consulting services related to the Accela Civic Platform implementation. B. The City does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the services required under this agreement and therefore, the City desires to contract for consulting services to accomplish this work. C. The Consultant warrants to the City that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement. D. The City desires to contract with the Consultant to perform the services as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, the City and the Consultant agree as follows: 1 CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as EXHIBIT A. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a total of $29,725, for CONSULTANT’s services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, by not later than the 10th day of each month, its invoice for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous month. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT all uncontested amounts set forth in CONSULTANT’s invoice within 30 days after it is received. 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES. CONSULTANT will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE OF SERVICE attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. DocuSign Envelope ID: 4CF9E314-29AB-4D72-9D73-7F1058BE4CCE Page 150 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 9 Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement. 3 PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement, CONSULTANT must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the reimbursable costs, the specific tasks performed, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period in accordance with the schedule of compensation incorporated in “Exhibit A.” 4 TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of the CONTRACTOR are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from the CITY and shall continue until all authorized work is completed to the CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in “Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing by the CITY. 5 FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that CONSULTANT has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. 6 KEY PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT’s key person assigned to perform work under this Agreement is Connie Ingram or Melissa Kern. CONSULTANT shall not assign another person to be in charge of the work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the City. 7 TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on June 30, 2022, unless earlier termination occurs under Section 11 of this Agreement, or this Agreement is extended in writing in advance by both parties. 8 CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties. 9 TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 10 PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONTRACTOR will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. 11 TERMINATION. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 30 days before the effective termination date. In the event of such termination, the CONTRACTOR shall cease services as of the date of termination, and all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property, and CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination. DocuSign Envelope ID: 4CF9E314-29AB-4D72-9D73-7F1058BE4CCE Page 151 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 9 Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated. 12 INDEMNIFICATION. CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, elected officials and employees from and against all claims, demands and judgments (including attorney fees) made or recovered against them including, but not limited to, damages to real or tangible property or for bodily injury or death to any person, arising out of, or in connection with this contract, to the extent such damage, injury or death is caused or sustained in connection with the negligent performance or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, or its employee, agents or subcontractors. The City agrees to promptly notify CONSULTANT in writing of any such claim or demand to indemnify and agrees to cooperate with CONSULTANT in a reasonable manner to facilitate the defense of such claim. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONSULTANT as required by Section 17, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification. 13 ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT’s professional services. CONSULTANT’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s written approval are prohibited and will be null and void. 14 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is it performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only. 15 AUDIT OF RECORDS. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement. CONSULTANT will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement. 16 CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONSULTANT will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement. CONSULTANT will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by the City to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONSULTANT to implement required corrective measures shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement. 17 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. DocuSign Envelope ID: 4CF9E314-29AB-4D72-9D73-7F1058BE4CCE Page 152 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 9 A. The CONSULTANT, at the CONSULTANT’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies: 1. Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. The Consultant shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by the CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the CONTRACTOR for City. 2. General Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. 3. Automobile Liability Coverage. This requirement shall be waived, as this contract is for remote work, and CONSULTANT does not own any vehicles. 4. Professional Liability Coverage. The CONSULTANT shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from the CONSULTANT’S operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by the CONSULTANT or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit-per- occurrence basis. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONSULTANT will continue to renew the insurance for a period of one (1) year after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect. B. Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional liability insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and/or authorized to do business in the State of California, or which is approved in writing by City, and shall be endorsed as follows. CONSULTANT also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.” 2. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the CITY, including any self-insured retention the CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy. 3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. 4. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents. DocuSign Envelope ID: 4CF9E314-29AB-4D72-9D73-7F1058BE4CCE Page 153 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 9 5. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. 6. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the CITY. C. CONSULTANT agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against Contractor arising out of the work performed under this agreement. CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY. D. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. At the CITY’s option, the CONSULTANT shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. E. The CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to the CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement. F. Failure on the part of the CONSULTANT to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which the CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 11 above. G. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required by this Agreement shall allow City, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the Consultant (as the named insured) should Consultant fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. Consultant understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by Consultant as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should City pay the SIR or deductible on Consultant’s behalf upon the Consultant’s failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, City may include such amounts as damages in any action against Consultant for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by City due to the breach. 18 USE OF OTHER CONSULTANTS. CONSULTANT must obtain CITY’s prior written approval to use any sub-consultants while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must include approval of the proposed consultant and the terms of compensation. 19 FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by the CONSULTANT of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of the CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONSULTANT for anything done, furnished or relating to the CONSULTANT’S work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of the CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by the CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of the CONSULTANT, its employees, sub-consultants and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by the CITY for any DocuSign Envelope ID: 4CF9E314-29AB-4D72-9D73-7F1058BE4CCE Page 154 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 of 9 defect or error in the work prepared by the Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents. 20 CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the CONSULTANT shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during the City’s review of the Consultant’s report or plans. Should the Consultant fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by the CITY, and the cost thereof shall be charged to the CONSULTANT. In addition to all other available remedies, the City may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by the City or may withhold payment otherwise owed CONSULTANT under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction. 21 NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONSULTANT by CITY for services preformed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of CONSULTANT’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement shall cover payment for CONSULTANT’S services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year. 22 NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows: CITY CONSULTANT City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ATTN: Ken Robertson IK Consulting, LLC PO Box 17661 Tucson, AZ 85731 ATTN: Melissa Kern Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Courtesy copies of notices may be sent via electronic mail, provided that the original notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or personally delivered as specified in this Section. A. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT’s bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability. B. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONSULTANT’s or CITY’s obligations under this Agreement. DocuSign Envelope ID: 4CF9E314-29AB-4D72-9D73-7F1058BE4CCE Page 155 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Page 7 of 9 C. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County. D. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. E. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party. F. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY. 23 ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Contract, agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission or scanned and delivered via electronic mail. Such facsimile or electronic mail copies will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. 24 FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other. 25 TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be provided. 26 ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled. 27 STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY. CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency. DocuSign Envelope ID: 4CF9E314-29AB-4D72-9D73-7F1058BE4CCE Page 156 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Page 8 of 9 28 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. It is understood and agreed that the City shall own all documents and other work product of the Consultant, except the Consultant’s notes and workpapers, which pertain to the work performed under this Agreement. The City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion and without further compensation to the Consultant, but any re-use of such documents by the City on any other project without prior written consent of the Consultant shall be at the sole risk of the City. 29 DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (City and Consultant initials required at one of the following paragraphs) By their respective initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is a “consultant” for the purposes of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties would require him or her to make one or more of the governmental decisions set forth in Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation 18700.3(a) or otherwise serves in a staff capacity for which disclosure would otherwise be required were Consultant employed by the City. Consultant hereby acknowledges his or her assuming-office, annual, and leaving-office financial reporting obligations under the California Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code and agrees to comply with those obligations at his or her expense. Prior to consultant commencing services hereunder, the City’s Manager shall prepare and deliver to consultant a memorandum detailing the extent of Consultant’s disclosure obligations in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials ______ Consultant Initials ______ OR By their initials next to this paragraph, City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is not a “consultant” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of consultant in Fair Political Practice Commission Regulation 18700.3(a) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. City Initials ______ Consultant Initials ______ IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first herein above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT Suja Lowenthal, City Manager By: Melissa Kern, Managing Partner, IK Consulting, LLC MOK Digitally signed by MOK DN: cn=MOK, o, ou, email=missy.kern@ikcpartners.co m, c=US Date: 2021.05.26 10:37:56 -07'00' Melissa O. Kern Digitally signed by Melissa O. Kern DN: cn=Melissa O. Kern, o=IK Consulting, LLC, ou=Managing Partner, email=missy.kern@ikcpartners.com, c=US Date: 2021.05.26 10:38:26 -07'00' DocuSign Envelope ID: 4CF9E314-29AB-4D72-9D73-7F1058BE4CCE Page 157 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Page 9 of 9 ATTEST: 71-0883304 Eduardo Sarmiento, City Clerk Taxpayer ID No. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Jenkins, City Attorney DocuSign Envelope ID: 4CF9E314-29AB-4D72-9D73-7F1058BE4CCE Page 158 of 1126 Page 159 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: C838C279-F928-47CC-A0F3-917042A928B5 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE AS NEEDED ACCELA CIVIC PLATFORM CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND IK CONSULTING, LLC. THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE AS NEEDED ACCELA CIVIC PLATFORM CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND IK CONSULTING, LLC ("Second Amendment") is made and entered into this 24th day of May 2023, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corporation ("City") and IK Consulting, LLC, a limited liability company ("CONSULTANT"). RECITALS A.On May 13, 2021 the CITY entered into an agreement with CONSULTANT to provide as needed Accela Civic Platform consulting services. This agreement expired on June 30, 2022. B.On July 1, 2022 the CITY and CONSULTANT amended the Agreement to extend the agreement for an additional year to provide the continuing as needed services. This new contract is set to expire on June 30, 2023. C.The CITY and CONSULTANT now desire to amend the Agreement to extend the agreement for an additional year to provide the continuing as needed services. The new contract is set to expire on June 30, 2024. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties agree as follows: 1 . Section 7 is amended to read as follows: 7.TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on June 30, 2024, unless earlier termination occurs under Section 11 of this Agreement, or this Agreement is extended in writing in advance by both parties. Except as modified above, the Agreement and each and every term and provision thereof remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment on the date and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Suja Lowenthal, City Manager ATTEST: Myra Maravilla, City Clerk CONSULTANT Melissa 0. Kern By: Melissa 0. Kern, Managing Partner IK Consulting, LLC 71-0883304 Taxpayer ID No. Page 160 of 1126 THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO PROVIDE AS NEEDED ACCELA CIVIC PLATFORM CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND IK CONSULTING, LLC This Third Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services to provide as needed Accela Civic Platform Consulting Services (“Third Amendment”) is entered into this 15th day of May 2024, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corporation (“City”) and IK Consulting, LLC. (“CONSULTANT”). RECITALS A. On May 13, 2021 the CITY entered into an agreement with CONSULTANT to provide as needed Accela Civic Platform consulting services for a term of one year and a not-to-exceed amount of $29,725. This agreement expired on June 30, 2022. B. On July 1, 2022 the CITY and Consultant executed a first amendment to the Agreement to extend the agreement for an additional year to provide the continuing as needed services. The agreement expired on June 30, 2023. C. On May 24, 2023 the CITY and Consultant executed a second amendment to the Agreement to extend the agreement for an additional year to provide the continuing as needed services. The agreement is set to expire on June 30, 2024. D. The CITY and Consultant now mutually desire to amend the Agreement to increase the not-to-exceed limit by $30,000, for a total not-to-exceed amount of $59,725, and to extend the agreement for an additional two years to provide the continuing as needed services. The new contract will be set to expire on June 30, 2026. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Agreement is amended as follows: 1. Section 1 is amended to read as follows: CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as EXHIBIT A. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a total not-to- exceed amount of $59,725, for CONSULTANT’s services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement. DocuSign Envelope ID: 7B0CB0A0-C5B6-41E8-920B-342D3E7AA7E4 Page 161 of 1126 No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, by not later than the 10th day of each month, its invoice for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous month. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT all uncontested amounts set forth in CONSULTANT’s invoice within 30 days after it is received. Except as modified above, the Agreement and each and every term and provision thereof remain in full force and effect. Except as above modified, in all other respects the Agreement is hereby reaffirmed in full force and effect. 2. Section 7 is amended to read as follows: 7. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on June 30, 2026, unless earlier termination occurs under Section 11 of this Agreement, or this Agreement is extended in writing in advance by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Third Amendment on the 15th day of May, 2024. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT Justin Massey, Mayor Melissa O. Kern, Managing Partner IK Consulting, LLC ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Myra Maravilla, City Clerk Patrick Donegan, City Attorney DocuSign Envelope ID: 7B0CB0A0-C5B6-41E8-920B-342D3E7AA7E4 Page 162 of 1126 IK CONSULTING, LLC SCOPE OF SERVICES EXHIBIT A Consulting Services Off Site or On Site Assistance – Hourly $145.00 / Hour • Project work for modifications to existing and new process creation, as assigned. 1. Workflow / Process. 2. Fees / Calculations. 3. User Setup / Security. 4. Custom Forms / Fields Layout. 5. User Defined Data / Tables. 6. Intake Forms / Status Groups. 7. Inspections / Result Groups. 8. Calendars / Events / Scheduling. 9. Accela add on products (such as Accela Citizen Access, Accela Mobile Office, Apps, etc). 10. Accela integrations and implementations for add on products (such as Solar App+, Bluebeam, Laserfiche, Finance Products, etc.) 11. Queries / Filters / Smart Charts. 12. Custom Reports / Ad Hoc Reports. 13. Events / Scripting. • Support tickets, as assigned. • Training documentation, as assigned. Training – Daily $1,740.00 / Day • End User and/or Administrative Training for the Civic Platform or add on products, as assigned. Not To Exceed Amount $59,725.00 Note: This is a time and materials quote and client will be billed based on hours actually worked. All work to be completed based on request, and expenses to be reimbursed, as incurred. PAYMENT TERMS Payment for Consulting will be invoiced monthly for work completed the previous month. Training will be invoiced at time of scheduling classes. IK Consulting, LLC expects payment to occur within 30 days of receipt of invoice unless otherwise agreed to. Sales Tax or any other applicable taxes are not included in any of this proposal's pricing information. If Sales tax or any other tax becomes applicable, these taxes will then need to be added to the proposed pricing. Quote valid for 90 days from date of quote. February 22, 2021 Hermosa Beach, CA Page 1 Confidential & Proprietary to IK Consulting, LLC. PO Box 17661 • Tucson, AZ 85731 • Voice: (520) 891-5376 • Fax: (520) 733-6282 DocuSign Envelope ID: 7B0CB0A0-C5B6-41E8-920B-342D3E7AA7E4 Page 163 of 1126 03/18/2024 San Tan Insurance 625 N Gilbert Rd., Suite 107 Gilbert AZ 85234 John Boughton 480-391-3883 480-391-9484 JFBoughton@santaninsurance.net IK Consulting, LLC P.O. Box 17661 Tucson AZ 85730 Hartford Casualty Insurance Co A x x x 59SBAZM4677 12/08/2023 12/08/2024 2,000,000 300,000 10,000 2,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 A x x 59SBAZM4677 12/08/2023 12/08/2024 2,000,000 A N 59WECGC6729 01/08/2024 01/08/2025 x 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 $1,000,000 each Glitch Limit A Errors & Omissions Liability 59SBAZM4677 12/08/2023 12/08/2024 $2,000,000 Aggregate City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 <> ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? INSR ADDL SUBR LTR INSD WVD DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) PRODUCER CONTACTNAME: FAXPHONE(A/C, No):(A/C, No, Ext): E-MAILADDRESS: INSURER A : INSURED INSURER B : INSURER C : INSURER D : INSURER E : INSURER F : POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXPTYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)(MM/DD/YYYY) AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTEDCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person)$ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRO-POLICY LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $JECT OTHER:$ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $(Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person)$ OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident)$AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) $ OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $$ PER OTH-STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y / N N / A (Mandatory in NH) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER: CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORDACORD 25 (2016/03) CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DocuSign Envelope ID: 7B0CB0A0-C5B6-41E8-920B-342D3E7AA7E4 Page 164 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PW-013 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CITY COUNCIL DOWNTOWN LIGHTING AND BEAUTIFICATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT ON EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025–2026 BEAUTIFICATION FUNDING CEQA: Determine the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines. (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente and Community Development Director Alison Becker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Determine the proposed improvements are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301; 2. Adopt the Expenditure Plan prepared by the City Council Downtown Lighting and Beautification Subcommittee; and 3. Authorize staff to undertake projects identified in the Expenditure Plan . Executive Summary: The City Council Downtown Lighting and Beautification Subcommittee was established in May 2025 during the annual budget process to identify and recommend an expenditure plan for a $100,000 set-aside of general funds for activities which would improve the downtown commercial district(s). The Subcommittee met on January 22, 2026 and again on February 24, 2026 and finalized an expenditure plan which focuses on projects which can be initiated immediately using existing staff and contracts to refresh landscape medians and community identity signage in high visibility areas before the end of the fiscal year. Background: This year’s budget created a pool of funds intended to improve the visual appearance of commercial areas within the City. The City Council also created a subcommittee to work with staff to review project options and develop a spending proposal for these funds. The Subcommittee met on two occasions this winter and finalized a spending proposal. This proposal is intended to be a demonstration of low-cost, high-impact projects to improve the public realm. The Subcommittee chose to focus on several planters along Hermosa Page 165 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 3 Avenue and the Strand for landscaping improvements and repairs to two vintage community identity signs at entrance points to the City. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description May 13, 2025 City Council created a subcommittee with Mayor Detoy and Councilmember Jackson to discuss downtown lighting and beautification goals. June 24, 2025 City Council adopted the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026 Budget that established $100,000 set-side for beautification projects. Discussion: The beautification work is proposed to take place at 5 locations: raised planters at 2nd Street and the Strand, raised planters at 22nd Street and the S trand, raised planters at 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue, the vintage “Hermosa Beach” sign at Valley Drive at Longfellow, and the vintage “Hermosa Beach” sign and planter on Prospect Avenue near Ripley Avene. The planters would each receive brick repair and painting, adjustments to the irrigation systems, as required, and installation with a new drought tolerant plant palette. Staff is proposing to create a small, new planting bed in front of the Valley Drive sign. City crews would perform repairs and painting work necessary to restore the two vintage signs. The landscape design would be completed by one of the City’s on -call landscape architects to evaluate and recommend modifications to the irrigation system as necessary and to assist the City with the selection of plants suitable for the locations and to ensure longevity and ease in maintenance. Staff would retain licensed contractors to perform the brick repair and painting and the landscape installation and associated irrigation adjustments. Options for Council Consideration: The City Council may (1) approve staff’s recommendations and approve the Subcommittee’s Beautification Fund Expenditure Plan, (2) approve an aspect of the Beautification Fund Expenditure Plan Project Description Estimated Amount Vintage Sign Repair $ 500.00 Brick repair and painting $ 20,000.00 Landscape and Irrigation design Landscape Installation and Irrigation Repair/Updates $ 15,000.00 $ 64,500.00 TOTAL $ 100,000.00 Page 166 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 3 expenditure plan and defer other(s), or (3) reject the expenditure plan and remand back to the Subcommittee for further refinement. Environmental Analysis: Maintenance and repair of existing public facilities are exempt from CEQA under Class 1 categorical exemptions when there is negligible or no expansion of use as is the case with these activities. Fiscal Impact: The $100,000 Beautification Project budget is currently budgeted in the Public Works Parks Division. There is no new fiscal impact resulting from this action, which is detailing the proposed use of funds currently budgeted in the City’s Fiscal Year 2025-2026 budget. Respectfully Submitted by: Alison Becker, Community Development Director Concur: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 167 of 1126 Page 168 of 1126 Page 169 of 1126 Page 170 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 16 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PW-014 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) 623 REGARDING MUNICIPAL PIER STRUCTURAL INSPECTION AND EVALUATION, REPAIR, AND REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT CEQA: Determine that the high priority structural repairs and removal and replacement of the Surfer’s Walk of Fame Plaques Project (“Project”) as part of CIP 623 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301. (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Determine that the high priority structural repairs and, removal, and replacement of the Surfer’s Walk of Fame Plaques Project (“Project”) as part of CIP 623 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities); 2. Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption within 5 business days; 3. Direct staff to complete the high priority repairs to the Municipal Pier (“Pier”) as part of CIP Project 623; 4. Direct staff to replace the Surfer’s Walk of Fame plaques with the railing-mounted option as part of CIP 623; and 5. Provide staff with direction on whether to begin the planning and environmental review process for a proposed replacement project. Executive Summary: Staff and the JMC2 Engineering (“JMC2”) team completed a comprehensive structural assessment of the Pier, including a cost-benefit evaluation, to guide the City in near- and long-term decision making. The assessment determined that the Pier is in poor to serious structural condition and will require reinspection and repair every 5 years for the foreseeable future as the structure continues to age in a highly corrosive marine environment. While the City recently completed $3.1M in repairs in 2023-2024, it is estimated that maintaining the existing structure would cost more than $210M over the next 45 years. The cost-benefit analysis found that replacing the Pier is significantly more cost-effective than continuing long-term repairs. A new Pier is estimated to cost approximately $58.6M Page 171 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 16 (in 2032 dollars) and would save the City more than $100M in lifecycle costs while providing a modern, resilient facility designed to serve the public for decades to come. Due to extensive planning, environmental review, and permitting requirements, the replacement process is expected to take at least 6 to 8 years before construction could begin. The City could choose to continue repairing the existing facility, but doing so would require funding increasingly costly repairs while deterioration accelerates as the facility approaches the end of its useful life. Staff recommends existing Pier maintenance projects cease after the 2027 repair; and that the Council direct staff to begin the planning and environmental review process for a proposed Pier replacement project to potentially start construction by 2032 (but no later than 2036, before experiencing substantial cost escalation). To start construction by 2032, Council would need to direct staff to begin planning efforts by late 2026. If the decision is deferred to 2030, construction could begin by 2036. The timing of this decision will affect whether the City must reserve funding for the next major round of pier repairs scheduled for 2030, which would need to be budgeted in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2027–2028 budget cycle. Whether the Pier is replaced or not, careful consideration will be necessary to determine when major maintenance should cease to avoid potential pier closures, similar to those currently affecting other municipal piers throughout California. Staff recommends the current Pier repairs project being advanced through CIP 629, which is currently in the final design and permitting phase, continue to move forward to address high priority repairs that must be completed by 2027 (regardless of a potential decision to replace the Pier in the future) to maintain structural integrity, prevent further load restrictions, and avoid potential closures of the Pier, while ensuring its continued use and enjoyment. Staff is also seeking Council direction for the replacement of the surfer plaques, which would be included as part of the current project. Background: Brief Pier History The City’s first Pier was built in 1904 by the Hermosa Beach Land and Water Company, constructed entirely of wood and extended approximately 500 feet into the Pacific Ocean1. In 1913 during a storm, the wooden Pier was partially destroyed and was subsequently demolished and replaced with a new concrete pier, approximately 1,000 feet long, paved with asphalt for its entire length1. In 1961, the Pier was demolished and replaced with the current concrete pier, which was completed in 1965 and remains today2. 1 Hermosa Beach Historical Society, https://www.hermosabeachhistoricalsociety.org/early-hermosa. 2 Daily Breeze, January 17, 2022, https://www.dailybreeze.com/2022/01/17/south-bay-history-former-hermosa- beach-nightspot-becomes-the-ocean-aquarium-marinelands-precursor/ Page 172 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 16 The existing Pier extends approximately 1,140 feet into the Pacific Ocean and is 20 feet in width, with a wider 50-foot by 68-foot-long turn-around at the end. Since its original construction, the existing structure has undergone a series of major repairs, with the most recent repair occurring in 2023-2024. 2023-2024 Major Repairs In February 2024, the City completed an approximately $3.1M structural and electrical improvements of the Pier, partially funded by $2.3M secured by Assembly Member Al Muratsuchi through the State budget process. The completed repairs addressed priority structural needs identified in the 2017 detailed structural assessment and as updated pursuant to an emergency, supplemental inspection completed in 2022. These inspections identified the highest priority needs at the time ( including repair of 29 concrete piles, 11 concrete pile caps, the lifeguard storage room beams and walls under the Pier ; and replacement of wooden top rails on the existing guard rail and a fractured concrete deck panel). The project also completed major upgrades to the Pier’s electrical and lighting systems, replacing deteriorated electrical conduits and fixtures that were no longer operational at the time. These up grades restored lighting along the north side of the Pier and ensured a more reliable electrical connection to the foghorn at the end of the Pier that is used for maritime navigational purposes and had been affected by electrical outages on the Pier. Prior to these repairs, staff had identified worsening concrete spalling conditions beyond those identified in the 2017 assessment. As a result, additional repairs were incorporated into the project scope and stall closely monitored tidal conditions during construction, which resulted in several full closures of the Pier during large storm events. Although the 2023–2024 repairs addressed high-priority pile and pile cap repairs, it was anticipated that the next major repair cycle would focus on the concrete deck system. New Comprehensive Inspection As part of CIP 623, the City commissioned a new comprehensive structural inspection, which is required approximately every 5 years in accordance with recommendations outlined in the California Building Code for Marine Structures. The previous full inspection occurred in 2017, with limited updates completed in 2022. Shortly following the conclusion of construction for the last round of repairs, s taff retained JMC2 to perform the new detailed inspection and evaluation in September 2024, with the field investigations commencing in October 2024. The inspection of the deck top, deck soffit, pile caps, and piles was conducted over the following periods: October 15-17, 2024 (through use of a rough terrain boom lift for close visual inspections from the beach), October 29 to November 8, 2024 (use of scaffold rig for close visual underside inspection over the water), October 15 to December 17, 2024 (top deck inspection) and December 17-18, 2024 (underwater dive inspection). Page 173 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 16 In addition to close-up visual, and tactile, inspections of the entire structure, the team also utilized ambient vibration testing, on 4 deck panels (November 17, 2024) and an additional 9 bays in March of 2025. The project team worked in close coordination with staff to evaluate and compare the results to refine the overall repair recommendations. At the May 13, 2025 CIP Study Session, staff provided Council with a preliminary update on the findings of the assessment report that indicated the need for substantial repair work with a rough order of magnitude cost of $6.7M over the next 5 years, including $3.7M of high priority repairs within the next 1 to 2 years to address approximately 13 deck panel replacements, deck panel strengthening, and deck panel soffit repair. An additional $3M in repairs would be required within the next 3 to 5 years to address concrete pile cap repairs and additional concrete deck panel repairs. In May 2025, the data from the ambient vibration tests was still being analyzed for incorporation into the full assessment report. At the same time, the team was working to prepare the cost-benefit analysis of future repairs required to maintain the structure. To avoid further weight restrictions or closure(s) of the Pier, staff recommended allocation of funding in the FY 2025–2026 budget for the first phase of repairs to address the highest priority repairs within the required 1–2-year timeframe. This in turn required the design team to move very quickly to complete the design and expedite a lengthy permitting process. In August 2025, staff retained JMC2 to begin the final design and permitting efforts for the high priority improvements. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description August 22, 2017 Award of Professional Service Agreement for CIP 16-629 the Assessment and Design of Structural Elements of the Municipal Pier to JMC2. January 11, 2022 Award of Professional Services Agreement for CIP 629 Municipal Pier Structural Repairs to JMC2. November 29, 2022 Adoption of a Resolution for Pier Grant Funds. February 27, 2023 Award of construction contract for CIP 629 Municipal Pier Structural Repairs and CIP 660 Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs to Jilk Heavy Construction. November 14, 2023 Adoption of a resolution approving the first amendment to the Jilk Heavy Construction, Inc. contract for CIP 629 Municipal Pier Structural Repairs and CIP 660 Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs. May 13, 2025 Staff presented initial structural assessment results to City Council at the CIP Study Session detailing the substantial repair work required at approximately $6.7M, with $3.7M in the next 1 to 2 years and an additional $3M in 3 to 5 years. Page 174 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 16 Discussion: 2026 Structural Assessment Findings The Structural Condition Assessment report was completed in January 2026 following extensive coordination between City engineering staff and JMC2. The report summarizes the detailed inspection observations, structural significance, repair and maintenance recommendations, and cost estimates for repairs. The report also details construction repair programming to establish budgets and timelines to maintain and repair the Pier for the next 45 years through the end of the Pier’s serviceable lifespan. Overall, the Pier is currently in poor to serious condition and will continue to require reinspection and repair at least, approximately every 5 years for the foreseeable future. Repairs may be combined, at the City’s discretion, to realize economies of scale for design and permitting work, project management, and construction cost , but combining them may not be feasible due to funding constraints. The following summarizes the report’s repair and maintenance recommendations. 1. Near-Term – High Priority (required repairs by 2026) Required work includes: Replacement of 4 concrete deck panels. Structural strengthening of 14 deck panels. Crack injection and spall repair for approximately 35% of deck panel soffits. Ambient vibration testing was used to refine the repair requirements and confirm no other major issues that could not be detected through other more conventional inspection methods. The Pier was originally designed for 10-ton truck loads, but the allowable load rating was reduced to 5 tons in 2023 due to deterioration. Repairs to the deck panels identified as in serious condition must be conducted within the next 1 to 2 years (or by end of 2026 since inspections were completed in Fall 2024) to avoid a further reduction in the load rating, restriction of vehicle access, and partial pier closure(s). Estimated Cost: $3.25M (2025 dollars); the design and permitting for these improvements is well underway as part of CIP 623. Page 175 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 6 of 16 2. Near-Term – Medium Priority (required repairs in 3-5 years) Repairs anticipated around 2030 include: Concrete Pile Cap crack injection and spall repairs to approximately 80% of pile caps. Concrete Deck Panels crack injection and spall repairs to approximately 45% of deck panel soffits and 90% of deck panel tops. Estimated Cost: $3.22M in 2025 dollars (or $3.92M in 2030 dollars). 3. Mid-Term (required repairs in 6 - 10 years) Repairs anticipated around 2035 include: Concrete pile spall repairs and fiberglass jacket repairs to approximately 6 piles. Concrete pile caps spall repairs anticipated to be identified in future inspection efforts. Estimated Cost: $4.38M in 2025 dollars (or $6.49M in 2035 dollars). 4. Long-Term (required repair beyond 10 years) The field inspection did not identify any current defects that will specifically require repairs 10 years or more in the future. However, we anticipate the need for additional rounds of pile repairs, pile cap repairs, and deck panel repairs as deterioration continues to accelerate. The existing Pier facility is more than 60 years old and nearing the end of its service life. Concrete structures in the marine environment typically require concrete corrosion repairs on an average 5 - year cycle after they reach 50-years of age. The volume and cost of these repairs accelerate until the end of the facility’s useful life. Assuming that the high priority repairs are completed as recommended, the Pier will continue to need inspection at 5-year intervals; the next routine inspection should occur in Fall 2029. As the structure ages, and if subsequent inspections determine that the Pier has rapidly advancing deterioration, a more frequent interval may be required. Page 176 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 7 of 16 2026 Cost – Benefit Analysis To assist in identifying the most cost-efficient timing for potential replacement of the Pier with new a new structure, a cost–benefit analysis was completed to compare long-term repair costs with full Pier replacement. The analysis compared the significant capital outlay cost of a new facility with the projected escalating cost of repairs as the Pier nears the end of its service life. The benefit of the new facility includes its very low to no maintenance costs typically for the first 15 to 20 years. The following table provides a summary of the repair costs that are anticipated to be required to maintain the existing Pier over the next 45 years. The repairs have been grouped into reasonable projects that will typically occur in 5-year increments to reduce the number of individual construction mobilizations and minimize public impact. The budgetary cost estimates for each construction project include the costs of routine and design-level inspections, design, geotechnical investigation, environmental permitting, contract administration, and construction support efforts. Projected Repair Costs to Existing Pier (2025 – 2070) Repair Year Estimated Repair Cost Cumulative Cost 2025-2027 $3,511,000 $3,511,000 2030 $3,916,000 $7,427,000 2035 $6,490,000 $13,917,000 2040 $9,459,000 $23,376,000 2045 $12,641,000 $36,017,000 2050 $17,654,000 $53,671,000 2055 $23,706,000 $77,377,000 2060 $31,676,000 $109,053,000 2065 $43,512,000 $152,565,000 2070 $57,670,000 $210,235,000 Notes: 1. 2025-2027 repair year is the current project under design (CIP 623) 2. Costs adjusted for inflation assuming 4% annual. As detailed in the table above, the repair costs are anticipated to increase significantly for each successive 5-year repair, with a cumulative projected cost of more than $210M over the next 44 years to maintain the existing structure. Meanwhile, the cost for a new replacement Pier is anticipated to be about $44.5M (in 2025 dollars), assuming a structure of roughly the same size and amenities as further detailed in the assessment report. The budgetary cost estimate includes the cost for the demolition of the existing Pier and construction of a full replacement pier and the associated design and other administrative costs. It is anticipated that the replacement of the Pier will be a lengthy process and could take at least 6 to 8 years before construction could in order to complete the necessary Page 177 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 8 of 16 planning, public outreach, CEQA environmental assessment efforts, design, permitting, and advertisement. To determine the most cost-efficient timing for the City to replace the Pier with a new structure, staff compared the anticipated maintenance and construction costs for the Pier based on what year the pier is replaced. The following figure details the costs for 45 different scenarios, one for each calendar year from 2026 to 2070, determining the total costs over the next 45 years if the Pier is replaced in that year. The costs include maintenance projects for the current Pier, the cost of a new facility, and the costs of maintaining the new facility (which are very low for the first 15 to 20 years following new construction). As illustrated in the figure above, it is estimated that the scenario where the Pier is replaced in the year 2032 would result in the lowest, or optimal, replacement cost when considering costs over a 45-year period (2025-2070). The total Pier costs through 2070 are estimated to be $103.9M if the Pier is replaced in 2032 (this cost includes the cost of replacement which is estimated at $58.6M in 2032 dollars plus the ongoing cost of maintenance over the remainder of the 45 year period). For comparison, the total Pier cost $107.8M if the Pier is replaced in 2036. The costs begin to rise significantly after year 2036. The following figure compares the total costs for the Pier (over the next approximately 44 years) for the scenario where the Pier is replaced in 2032 versus the scenario where the Pier is not replaced, but received the required repairs per the projected maintenance schedule detailed in the table above. $80,000,000 $130,000,000 $180,000,000 $230,000,000 $280,000,000 $330,000,000 $380,000,000 $430,000,000 Cost in DollarsPier Replacement Year Total Pier Costs (2025 -2070) Based on Year the Pier is Replaced Page 178 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 9 of 16 When adjusted for inflation, the replacement of the Pier in 2032 is projected to cost approximately $58.6M ($44.5M in 2025 dollars). If the Pier were to be replaced in 2032, the overall savings of new construction are typically not fully seen until approximately 15 to 20 years after construction of the new facility; however, the City would realize net savings over the 45-year period of approximately $107M by 2070. It should also be noted that in the year 2070 the existing pier will reach an age of 105 years and will likely have no remaining useful service life and would then require replacement. 2026 Structural Assessment Recommendations It is recommended that existing Pier maintenance projects cease after the 2027 repair project is completed and that the Council direct staff to begin planning and environmental review for a proposed replacement project to start construction in the year 2032. The Near Term – High Priority 2027 repair project must be completed as planned to avoid a reduction in the current Pier load rating, restriction of vehicle weight, or localized deck area closures. To break ground for construction of a new Pier in 2032, planning studies, public outreach tasks, and environmental assessment studies will likely need to be started as early as the second half of 2026 to avoid partial Pier closures and may not be achievable on that timeline given the lengthy perm itting and funding requirements. It is important to note that there is only a 4% total cost difference of Pier replacement over the next 10 years, which gives the City some flexibility in choosing to replace the pier any year before 2036 without significant additional cost over replacement in the optimal year 2032. If the Pier is replaced in 2032, the 2030 Near Term – Medium Priority recommended repair project would not be fully implemented as outlined , but instead a revised/reduced repair $- $50,000,000 $100,000,000 $150,000,000 $200,000,000 $250,000,000 Cost in DollarsYear Cumulative Pier Costs (2025 -2070) Replace Pier in 2032 Repair Existing Pier through 2070 Page 179 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 10 of 16 list may still be required with the goal of maintaining public safety prior to demolition; this may include some isolated repairs, restricting access to parts of the Pier, reducing the size of vehicles allowed on the pier, or temporary structural improvements. If the Pier is not replaced until 2036 or later, staff would need to continue inspections and repairs per the recommended repairs schedule until that time. Current Project – CIP 623 For the City to ensure the continued use and operation of the Pier as de tailed above, the Near Term High Priority repairs must be completed within 1 to 2 years regardless of any decision to replace the Pier in the future. The following details staff’s ongoing efforts to advance these repairs as part of CIP 623: Final Design: The Project is currently at 75% design and staff is actively working to finalize the design package, which may be subject to special conditions following the conclusion of permitting efforts. Permitting: Staff concluded permitting requirements with the Army Corps of Engineers and the Water Board. However, permitting is still ongoing with the Coastal Commission, who required additional supplemental studies further detailing construction methods and impacts and a biological and environmental assessment. Preparation of the supplemental studies are underway but will take through April 2026 to complete before staff can fully respond to Coastal Commission and receive a Coastal Development Permit (“CDP”), and any potential special conditions that would need to be identified prior to advertising for construction. Schedule: Pending receipt of final permits, staff is anticipating advertising the project by Summer 2026, with start of construction targeted to begin as soon as October 2026. Funding: The FY 2025-2026 budget includes $3.7M for the Project, with approximately $466,000 set aside for inspection, design, and permitting; and approximately $3.24M for construction and construction administration. As the design phase nears completion, staff will determine if additional funding is required as part of the FY 2026-2027 budget process to further supplement the construction. Current funding for the Project is primarily general funds and staff has actively pursued grant funding from a wide variety of sources: o Wildlife Conservation Board (“WCB”)– Following what was initially a positive review by WCB staff, the City was invited to submit a pre-application; however, WCB staff reviewed the information provided and the Project was not selected to move on to the full application phase due to receipt of a high volume of competitive applications and limited funding availability. Page 180 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 11 of 16 o California State Coastal Conservancy – Conservancy staff reviewed the request in coordination with City staff and determined that the Project would not be competitive per their grant requirements. o Federal Funding – Staff submitted requests as part of the FY 2026 request process via the offices of Representative Lieu, Senator Padilla, and Senator Schiff. However, these annual federal budgetary requests were deemed oversubscribed, and the Congress also eliminated all FY 2025 requests in its last Continuing Resolution. There were also no Federal discretionary grant programs that had direct alignment with this Pier Project; the potential exception was the federal PROTECT program that was eliminated by Federal Emergency Management Agency. o State Funding – Staff submitted a request as part of the FY 2026 funding process through Assembly Member Al Muratsuchi’s office. Staff received a response that due to the state budget deficit, budget requests may not be granted during this budget cycle. W ithout further project-specific feedback, the project was not selected for funding. o Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District – Staff submitted an application in October 2026 and was notified on March 6, 2026, that the project was not selected due to a highly competitive pool of applicants . Surfer’s Walk of Fame (“SWOF”) Plaques: Currently, there are 60 bronze plaques installed, each measuring 15”x12”, on the Pier deck honoring South Bay surf legends inducted into the City’s SWOF from 2003 to 2019. The plaques display the inductee, the year of induction, the category in which they were inducted, and each plaque recognizing an individual inductee includes a brief biography. The program was initiated in 2003 by community member Roger Bacon, with the City collaborating until 2007; after which it assumed full management. Each year, plaques were installed in advance of the annual April induction ceremony recognizing the year’s inductees. An overview of the current plaques on the Pier deck and their layout is provided in (Attachment 2). Plaque installation on the deck was paused in 2020 due to concerns regarding the installation method, safety concerns, and potential structural impacts to the Pier. The City has inducted additional surfing legends into the SWOF in 2020, 2023, 2024, and 2025; with more inductees anticipated in April 2026. There were no inductees in 2021 or 2022 due to impacts from COVID-19. Those inducted into the SWOF since 2020 have not yet had plaques installed on the Pier deck in recognition. 6 plaques are currently missing and have been temporarily replaced with concrete to prevent tripping hazards. Ongoing maintenance, including the repair and replacement of plaques, as well as instances of theft, has been a recurring challenge. The plaques are deteriorating and many are now illegible. Another concern is the lack of chronological order of the plaques on the Pier deck. Page 181 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 12 of 16 The original installation of the plaques required chase cutting through the concrete deck panel surface to install the plaques flush with the walking surface. Any cutting into the deck damages the concrete panels since there is no topping slab present. These modifications have compromised the protective cover over the reinforcing steel in the panels and other exposed elements and result in water ingress, which can lead to corrosion and more rapid deterioration of the structure. Additional structural observations in February 2026 identified several plaques were depressed by about ¾” inch in the center indicating the sonotubes (hollow tubes inside the deck panels) may have been punctured. Further investigations are needed to determine the extent of damage at these locations which will require specialized repair beyond what had been originally anticipated. The waterproof treatment at many of the plaques has been compromised at several locations or missing all together. All polymers used for sealing have a limited lifespan when exposed to sunlight and ultraviolet radiation and even if sealed properly cracked edges may persist. Once the sealant deteriorates and cracks, water ingress becomes inevitable. Embedded plaques on the Pier’s concrete deck is no longer advisable. Furthermore, staff is recommending removal of the existing plaques and replacing them at another location so that the existing locations can be properly repaired, to reduce further deterioration of the deck panels, and minimize maintenance needs . Staff have evaluated various options for replacement: o Option 1: Railing Mounted Plaque (staff recommended option): New stainless plaques could be installed on top of the wooden hand railings along each side of the Pier (Attachment 3). Based on staff research, stainless steel is more durable than the current bronze in a coastal environment, offering greater resistance to corrosion from salt air, moisture, and sun exposure, which will help ensure long-term legibility and reduce maintenance needs and can be replaced at a lower cost at approximately $216 per plaque. Instead of installing a plaque for each individual inductee, as was done prior to 2020, plaques would be grouped to represent each induction year, with 2–3 plaques used in years with a large number of inductees, reducing the total number of plaques to about 30. This option preserves the surfers’ “walk of fame” feel along the Pier, provides ample space for future plaques, and maintains proximity to the ocean (which prior inductees have demonstrated is important to them). Staff consulted the program’s current judges, consisting of members of the South Bay surf community, and past inductees; all of whom agreed that this is the most practical option to quickly resume plaque installations, replace missing plaques, and install plaques for the 2020, 2023, 2024, and 2025 inductees. Page 182 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 13 of 16 o Option 2: Schumacher Plaza: In 2019, when concerns were presented to members of the surfing community regarding the potential structural impacts to the Pier, staff began considering two other options that were discussed with former inductees on Schumacher Plaza (Attachment 3): Option 2A: Build a lighted wall for the plaques surrounding the Tim Kelly Statue, utilizing the existing cement base. The wall would be roughly 58 feet long, with a height to be determined, but positioned below average eye level to avoid obstructing the beach view. The plaques would include only the inductee’s name, the category under which they were inducted, and the year; with the size to be determined but significantly smaller than the Pier deck plaques. Concerns with this option would be the limited space on such a wall to accommodate future years’ inductees, and it wouldn’t necessarily preserve the “walk of fame” feel. Option 2B: Plaques would be placed into the ground surrounding the Tim Kelly Statue, either forming a full circle around the statue or a half circle in front. The plaques would include only the inductee’s name, the category under which they were inducted, and the yea r, with the size to be determined but significantly smaller than the Pier deck plaques. However, there were concerns with this location. The Tim Kelly Statue was made possible through donations from friends and local lifeguards and was specifically dedicated to honoring the legacy of service through the Los Angeles County Fire Department’s Lifeguard Division. Using this site for a separate surfers’ recognition program could detract from the statue’s original purpose and might be seen as conflating two disti nct programs. Additionally, placing plaques around the statue could be considered as diminishing the “walk of fame” feel, as well. Under either option, the plaques currently embedded in the Pier deck would be removed. The City would offer these plaques to the inductees or their families, and any plaques not claimed would be offered to the Hermosa Beach Museum for preservation. Page 183 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 14 of 16 Key Considerations: Staff completed a comprehensive analysis of the Municipal Pier Structure including a cost-benefit assessment to guide the City in decision making in the near- and long-term and has been aggressively working to complete ongoing design and permitting efforts as part of CIP 623 to address high priority needs on the structure that need to be completed by 2027. Staff is seeking direction from Council in the following areas: 1. Completion of the current round of High Priority Repairs to the Pier as part of CIP 623 – Staff recommends that Council direct staff to continue to expeditiously complete the Near Term High Priority Repairs by 2027 to ensure the Pier’s continued use and enjoyment, while avoiding a further reduction in the current Pier load rating and potential for partial Pier closures. 2. Replacement of the Surfer’s Walk of Fame plaques as part of CIP 623 – Staff recommends Council direct staff to replace the existing Surfer’s Walk of Fame plaques with a railing mounted option as part of CIP 623 so that the program can continue and in a way that eliminates structural damage to the Pier and reduces overall maintenance needs; and 3. Consideration of replacement versus continued repair – Since long-term maintenance costs are projected to increase, staff recommends existing pier maintenance projects cease after the 2027 repair; and that Council direct staff to begin the planning and environmental review process for a proposed replacement project to begin construction in the year 2032, or ideally no later than 2036, before costs are anticipated to rise substantially and project to save the City more than $100 million in lifecycle. Council could decide to continue to repair the facility; however, the City will be required to fund increasingly more cost ly repairs and overall lifecycle costs will accelerate. Replacement of the Pier would be a lengthy process and could take at least 6 to 8 years to start construction while completing necessary planning, public outreach, CEQA environmental assessment effort s, design, permitting, and advertisement. Staff thus seeks direction on whether to begin the planning and environmental review process for a proposed Pier replacement Project. Council would need to provide such direction by the end of 2026 to possibly break ground by 2032, or provide direction by no later than 2030 to break ground by 2036. This decision would impact whether the City will need to start reserving funds for the next round of repairs slated in 2030 that would need to be budgeted in the FY 2027-2028 budget. Careful consideration will be needed on when to end maintenance on the Pier to avoid potential closures as is currently being experienced on other municipal pier structures such as in Ocean Beach in San Diego (which has been closed indefinitely) while replacement is being considered. The availability of outside funding remains competitive and limited for maintenance projects or replacement projects and if replacement is being considered, the City would need to begin seeking outside funding sources as it is anticipated to cost approximately $58.6M by 2032 when adjusted for inflation. Page 184 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 15 of 16 Environmental Analysis: For CEQA purposes, the City has evaluated the Near Term High Priority Repairs and the removal and replacement of the Surfer’s Walk of Fame Plaques in the railing together as a single project. The current Project is exempt from CEQA under the Existing Facilities Exemption identified in CEQA Guidelines section 15301. The Near Term High Priority Repairs component of the Project consists of the repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation of the existing Pier facility. The plaque removal likewise consists of repair and maintenance to the existing Pier, and replacing the plaques in the railing is a minor alteration of the existing Pier. If Council selects Option 2A or 2B with respect to the plaque replacement, the existing facilities exemption still applies because those options involve minor alterations of the existing Schumacher Plaza. In addition, the Project will not expand either the existing or former use of the Pier. The Project will complete required structural repairs to allow the continued use and enjoyment of the structure; however, the structure will still operate with a reduced load rating of 5 tons. None of the exceptions identified in CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 applies. The cumulative impact of the Project is not significant because the repairs, and plaque removal and replacement, improve the safety of the Pier and have no significant adverse impacts. The Project does not involve any unusual circumstances and will not result in any significant adverse impacts. The Project is not located within a highway that has been officially designated as a state scenic highway or on a hazardous waste site. And the Pier is not designated as a historical resource, so the Project will not cause a substantial adverse change in any historical resource. Fiscal Impact: Current Project CIP 623 Currently the City has budgeted $3.7M for the design, permitting, and construction of CIP Project 623, using a combination of available Tyco (122), RTI Tidelands (191), and CIP (301) funds. Should Council direct staff to replace the Surfer plaques with the railing mounted option, it is anticipated that the cost would be approximately $12,000 for the fabrication and installation. Staff is still determining if additional funds for the larger project will be required as the design plans are being finalized and contingent on additional permitting requirements by the Coastal Commission. Potential Pier Replacement The most cost-efficient timing for the City to replace the Pier is 2032. A new pier is estimated to cost approximately $58.6 M (in 2032 dollars). The total estimated cost to replace and maintain a new pier from 2032 to 2070 is $103.9M. Page 185 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 16 of 16 If the decision is deferred to 2030, the total cost increases to $107.8M to replace and maintain a new pier for that same time period. Staff recommends a decision be made at the latest by 2030 since the costs begin to rise significantly after year 2036. Replace Pier by 2032 Replace Pier by 2036 Repair Existing Pier to Year 2070 Decision Deadline 2026 2030 N/A Pier Replacement and Maintenance Cost from 2025 to 2070 * $103.9M $107.8M $210.2M * Maintenance costs is up to year 2070 for projections. If the Pier is replaced, the City could potentially save more than $100M in lifecycle costs. Council would need to provide direction on whether to begin the planning and environmental review process for a proposed Pier replacement Project by the end of 2026, otherwise, if the decision is deferred, staff will need to budget approximately $4.0M in the FY 2027-28 budget cycle for the next round of repairs. Attachments: 1. Pier Structural Condition Assessment Report, January 2026 2. Surfer ’s Walk of Fame Existing Plaque Layout 3. Surfer’s Walk of Fame Plaque Replacement Options Respectfully Submitted by: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director Concur: Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Concur: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 186 of 1126 Corporate: 411 N. Harbor Boulevard, Suite 201, San Pedro, CA 90731 Los Angeles: T 310-241-6550 www.jmc-2.com Orange County: T 714-444-2422 STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT MUNICIPAL PIER – HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 19, 2026 Prepared for: Prepared by: The City of Hermosa Beach John M. Cruikshank Consultants, Inc. (JMC2) Joe SanClemente, PE John Cruikshank, PE & Vipul Ahuja, SE Public Works Director ESN Engineering, PLLC Eric Newman, SE & Cameron Duncan, SE Sensequake Farshad Mirshaflei, Ph.D., P.Eng. Page 187 of 1126 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 1 1.1. Assessment Summary ..................................................................................... 1 1.2. Repair Recommendation Summary .................................................................. 1 1.3. Future Inspection Recommendations ............................................................... 2 1.4. Condition Assessment Limitations ................................................................... 2 1.5. Cost/Beneflt Analysis ...................................................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Facility Description ......................................................................................... 4 2.2. Structural Conditions Assessment ................................................................... 4 2.3. Cost / Beneflt Analysis ..................................................................................... 6 3. CONDITIONS & REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................... 7 3.1. Concrete Piles ................................................................................................ 7 3.2. Concrete Pile Cap Beams ................................................................................ 8 3.3. Concrete Deck Panels ..................................................................................... 9 3.4. Railing .......................................................................................................... 12 3.5. Lifeguard Storage Area ................................................................................... 13 3.6. Utility Lines ................................................................................................... 17 3.7. Embedded Plaques ....................................................................................... 18 3.8. Light Fixtures ................................................................................................ 20 3.9. Benches ....................................................................................................... 22 3.10. Staircase ...................................................................................................... 23 4. SENSEQUAKE TESTING COMPARISON .................................................................. 25 4.1. Concrete Piles .............................................................................................. 25 4.2. Concrete Pile Cap Beams .............................................................................. 27 4.3. Concrete Deck Panels ................................................................................... 27 4.4. GENERAL CONCLUSION STATEMENT ON SENSEQUAKE TESTING .................... 30 5. COST / BENEFIT ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 32 5.1. Existing Pier: Maintenance / Repairs ............................................................... 32 5.2. Replacement Pier: Cost Estimate ................................................................... 32 5.3. Analysis Assumptions ................................................................................... 33 5.4. Analysis Summary ......................................................................................... 34 Page 188 of 1126 5.5. Conclusions ................................................................................................. 38 APPENDIX .................................................................................................................. 39 Appendix A: Location and Vicinity Maps ................................................................. 39 Appendix B: Typical As-Built Drawings ................................................................... 39 Appendix C: Photographs ..................................................................................... 39 Appendix D: Field Notes ....................................................................................... 39 Appendix E: Budgetary Cost Estimate & Estimated Repair Quantities ....................... 39 Appendix F: Inspection Procedure ......................................................................... 39 Appendix G: Cost / Beneflt Analysis – Cost Estimates & Schedules .......................... 39 Appendix H: Sensequake Panel Testing (October 2025) ........................................... 39 Page 189 of 1126 1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1. Assessment Summary Overall, the piles and pile caps are in Fair condition. The deck panels are in Poor to Serious condition. The load capacity of the pier is currently governed by the condition of the deck panels. The current pier load rating allows for pedestrian access and vehicles under 5 tons. The pier was originally designed for 10-ton trucks. Repairs to the deck panels in Serious condition must be conducted within the next 1-2 years to avoid a reduction in the current pier load rating of 5 tons, restriction of vehicles, and partial pier closures. 1.2. Repair Recommendation Summary The following summarizes our repair and maintenance recommendations. Repairs may be combined, at the Owner’s discretion, to realize economies of scale for design work, project management and construction cost. A. NEAR TERM – HIGH PRIORITY (Repairs within 1-2 years) i. Concrete Deck Panels: Replace 4 deck panels; Repair 14 deck panels with flberglass laminate; Crack injection and spall repairs to approximately 35% of deck panel soffits (13 bays). Note: Due to the high cost of scaffolding, we have assumed that all panel soffits in a bay will be repaired at the same time. Repairs to these deck panels in Serious condition must be completed within the next 1-2 years to avoid a load rating reduction and partial pier closures. ii. Estimated Construction Cost of High Priority Repairs in 2025 Dollars = $3.25 million (see Appendix E, Pages E-2 and E-3). B. NEAR TERM – MEDIUM PRIORITY (Repairs in 3-5 years) i. Concrete Pile Caps: Localized crack injection and spall repairs to approximately 80% of pile caps. ii. Concrete Deck Panels: Localized crack injection and spall repairs to approximately 45% of deck panel soffits and 90% of deck panel tops. iii. Estimated Construction Cost of Medium Priority Repairs in 2025 Dollars = $3.22 million (see Appendix E, Pages E-4 and E-5). C. MID TERM (Repairs in 6 - 10 years) i. Concrete Piles: Spall repairs and flberglass jacket repairs to approximately 6 piles. (Note: due to 41% of the existing 60-year-old piles not previously being repaired, we anticipate there will be additional piles requiring repairs in 6 to 10 years. Page 190 of 1126 2 ii. Concrete Pile Caps: Anticipated future spall repairs to pile caps identifled in future inspection efforts. D. LONG TERM (Repairs beyond 10 years) The fleld inspection did not identify any current defects that will speciflcally require repairs 10 years or more in the future. However, we anticipate the need for additional rounds of pile repairs, pile cap repairs, and deck panel repairs as deterioration continues to accelerate. This facility is 60+ years old and nearing the end of its service life. Concrete structures in the marine environment typically require concrete corrosion repairs on an average 5-year cycle after they reach 50-years of age. The volume and cost of these repairs accelerate until the end of the facility’s useful life. The recommended repair for piles is to remove all loose and damaged concrete, install a flberglass form around the pile, clean the reinforcing, apply a corrosion inhibitor or bonding agent, and then flll the jacket with pumpable grout. The repair recommendation for pile caps and deck panels with spall damage is to chip out the deteriorated concrete, clean the reinforcing, apply a corrosion inhibitor, and then apply a polymer modifled epoxy mortar. Reinforcing steel that is missing or exhibiting section loss should be supplemented with additional reinforcing of the same size and spacing. Wide cracks not caused by corrosion may be injected with epoxy. Panels that have Signiflcant areas of weak concrete may require strengthening, which can likely be achieved using a wet-layup flberglass or carbon-flber laminate. Deck panels deemed in Severe condition from overstress require demolition and replacement-in-kind. 1.3. Future Inspection Recommendations The Pier is currently in Poor to Serious condition. Assuming that the high priority repairs are completed as recommended, we recommend inspecting the Municipal Pier at 5-year intervals as recommended by the California Building Code for Marine Structures; the next routine inspection should occur in Fall 2029. As the structure ages, and if subsequent inspections determine that the pier has rapidly advancing deterioration, a more frequent interval may be appropriate. The inspection timing should also be coordinated with the timing of funding for repairs. Design Level inspection should be coordinated with the start of construction to provide the City with the best value and to reduce the number of Change Orders during construction for changed conditions. 1.4. Condition Assessment Limitations Evaluation of architectural, civil, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing elements are outside the scope of this assessment. Structural analysis calculations including lateral capacity Page 191 of 1126 3 analysis, design of repairs, and preparation of construction documents are outside the current scope of this assessment, but these services are available, if requested. 1.5. Cost/Benefit Analysis The City of Hermosa Beach engaged us to develop a 45-year construction repair program for the Hermosa Beach Pier, including budgets and timelines, based on existing conditions, deterioration, and past repairs, with work grouped into 5-year projects to reduce costs and public impacts. We also prepared a cost–beneflt analysis comparing long-term repair costs with full pier replacement, identifying the most cost-effective timing for new construction given its signiflcantly lower maintenance needs in the flrst 15 to 20 years. Page 192 of 1126 4 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1. Facility Description The Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier is a concrete flshing and pedestrian pier, constructed in 1965, located at the end of Pier Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beach, CA (see Appendix A). The pier is 1,140 feet long by 20 feet wide with a wider 50 feet by 68 feet long turn-around at the end. The pier is constructed of 16-inch and 18-inch precast prestressed concrete octagonal piles, supporting 3’-0” high by 2’-8” wide cast-in-place concrete pile caps (see Appendix C, Photo 1). Precast concrete deck panels, measuring 1’-5” thick by 5’-0” wide, span between the pile caps (see Appendix B, Figures 1 and 2). There is a metal guard railing running around the entire perimeter of the pier with a wood top rail. There are three piles per bent in Bents 1 through 18 and four piles per bent in Bents 19 through 33 (see Figures 3 and 4). The outer piles, closest to the pier edge, batter away from the pier (see Photo 2). In Bents 34 through 36, two additional piles are added to each side of the pier for a total of seven piles per bent (see Figures 5 and 6). There are a total of 36 Bents and 135 piles. The typical spacing between bents is 32’-0” with a smaller spacing of 25’-0” between Bents 0 and 1 and Bents 34 to 36. The pier deck begins at street level, approximately 10 feet above mean seal level, and rises over the flrst 10 bents to an elevation approximately 20 feet above mean sea level, which is then consistent to the end of the pier. Bent 0 is a concrete abutment wall. Transverse expansion joints are located across the deck panels at Bents 5, 10 and 19 (see Figure 7). Vehicle access to the pier is currently restricted to lifeguard, police, and maintenance vehicles under 5 tons. Structural drawings and previous inspection reports were provided by the City of Hermosa Beach for review. 2.2. Structural Conditions Assessment The scope of work provides for the inspection and analysis of the existing pier conditions, above and below water, of the piles, pile caps, and deck panels, of the Municipal Pier in Hermosa Beach, CA. The scope also includes repair recommendations and repair cost Page 193 of 1126 5 estimates. The inspection of the deck top, deck soffit, pile caps, and piles was conducted over the following periods: October 15-17, 2024 (use of Rough Terrain Boom Lift), October 29 to November 8, 2024 (use of Trailerable Scaffold Rig), October 15 to December 17, 2024 (Top Deck Inspection) and December 17-18, 2024 (Dive Inspection). The Engineer Divers conducted a close visual inspection of 100% of the pier piling, pile cap beams, and pier deck. Marine growth was removed at 3 elevations from at least 10% of the piling to closely inspect the piles for damage, where surf conditions allowed. The underside of deck inspection was performed using two pieces of equipment to closely assess the deck soffit. Elements over the beach were inspected using a rough terrain boom lift and elements over the water were inspected by access from a trailerable scaffold rig. The surfaces of the concrete deck panels and pile caps were sounded with a hammer or solid steel headed putter to identify areas of delaminated, weak, damaged, or spalled concrete. A crack width gauge was used to record crack widths greater than hairline width. Due to the high cost of equipment rental to closely examine the deck soffit, a Design Level survey was performed for all observed damage and deterioration that is recommended for repair. The engineering team was responsible for the assessment of the concrete piles, concrete pile caps, and concrete deck panels (both soffit and topside), guardrails, stairs, CMU walls, storage areas under the pier, and trash receptacles. We also assessed the impact on the structural deck panels of bench attachments (current, removed, and abandoned fasteners) and surfer plaques. The team was also tasked with evaluating the conclusions by Sensequake of ambient vibration deck testing of the four deck panels between Bents 10 and 11 tested on November 17, 2024, and comparing the Sensequake conclusions with our visual and tactile observations. Sensequake subsequently tested an additional 9 bays in March of 2025, and ESN Engineering has reviewed, evaluated and incorporated Sensequake’s conclusions into our recommendations. This report includes a summary of observations, their structural signiflcance, repair recommendations, and cost estimates for repairs recommended within the next 5 years. The report discusses the overall structural system and typical conditions of the structural elements of the pier, as well as recommendations to maintain the structure. Page 194 of 1126 6 2.3. Cost / Benefit Analysis The City of Hermosa Beach asked us to perform construction repair programming to establish budgets and timelines to maintain and repair the Hermosa Beach Pier for the next 45 years (through the end of the pier’s serviceable lifespan). We reviewed existing conditions, deterioration levels, and past repair projects to extrapolate into yearly estimates of work to maintain the pier. Anticipated repairs were grouped into projects on a 5-year basis to capitalize high mobilization costs, reduce temporary public use restrictions, and limit public impact. Budgets have been provided for each project year with supporting documentation. We then prepared a cost / beneflt analysis to deflne the most cost-efficient timing for the City to plan for the long-term replacement of the pier with new construction. We compared the signiflcant capital outlay cost of a new facility with the projected escalating cost of repairs as the pier nears the end of its design service life. The beneflt of the new facility includes its very low to no maintenance costs typically for the flrst 15 to 20 years. Page 195 of 1126 7 3. CONDITIONS & REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS Observed conditions, their structural signiflcance, and repair recommendations are provided below for each element of the pier. 3.1. Concrete Piles Observed Conditions: A total of 54 octagonal 16” and 81 octagonal 18” precast concrete piles support the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier. The Engineer Divers conducted a Level I inspection (see Appendix F for Inspection Procedures) on all the piles both above and below water. Engineer Divers conducted a Level II inspection on 10% of the piles. Between Bents 9 and 36, approximately 51 piles have been repaired with a grout-fllled flberglass jacket; 34 piles were repaired in 2023 (see Photo 3) and approximately 27 piles have been repaired with a flberglass jacket prior to 2017 (see Photo 4). The 2023 jacket repairs appear to be performing well. The flrst 8 bents of piles have been previously repaired by wrapping a flberglass jacket tightly around the pile and no subsequent damage was noted (see Photo 6). Pile 16:A has been repaired with a steel jacket (see Photo 7) that appears to be performing well. Many of the older jacket repairs have split open with visible cracks in the concrete behind the jacket (see Photo 8) or show signs of degradation due to wave impact and/or UV exposure (see Photo 9). At approximately 7 locations, stainless steel straps have been wrapped around the existing flberglass jacket to hold the jacket in place. A flberglass form fllled with concrete has been installed around the bottom 6 feet of Piles 36:F and 36:G extending into the mudline. Approximately 41% of the concrete piles have not been previously repaired. Overall, the piling is in Fair condition. Approximately 23 piles have at least one area of corrosion induced Vertical Cracking or Spalling. Between Bents 9 and 36, there are approximately 4 piles with Moderate Open Corrosion Spalls (see Photos 10 and 11) and approximately 19 piles with Minor Closed Corrosion Spalls, typically at the top of the pile (see Photo 12). Page 196 of 1126 8 Overall, approximately 58% of the piles show no visible damage, 25% of piles have Minor vertical cracking, and 18% of the piles have Minor to Moderate corrosion defects. The piles in the tidal zone experience a continuous wetting and drying cycle due to changes in tides and splashes from waves. This aggressive environment accelerates corrosion. The Level II examination performed on a 10% sample of piles is intended to represent general pile conditions. The piles were cleaned at 3 water depths, where surf conditions allowed, and checked for softness and the presence of abnormalities (see Photos 5 and 14). Most of the concrete piles examined were found flrm, which suggests that the piles are not under chemical attack beyond typical corrosion related defects. Structural Significance: The concrete piling provides both vertical and lateral support for the pier. The previously performed pile jacket repairs appear to mostly be performing well. The older pile jackets that have split open with cracked grout behind the jackets are indicative of advancing corrosion deterioration of the original pile reinforcing. As the original pile reinforcing continues to corrode, it expands, bursting open the flberglass jacket and cracking the grout between the original pile and jacket. This frequently occurs near the jacket tops. This represents a Moderate loss of capacity and requires repair as a Medium Priority. The jackets should be held in place with straps until repairs are made as the straps do slow the rate of environmental attack and hold the debris in place, so it does not become a hazard to beachgoers. No reductions in pile capacity are recommended currently. Repair Recommendations: No repairs to the piling are recommended within the next 5 years. In 5 to 10 years, repairs will likely be required for the following: 1. Fiberglass Jacket Tears: Piles 9:A and 11:E 2. Closed Corrosion Spalls: Pile 15:A, 3. Open Corrosion Spalls: Piles 23:B, 34:F, 35:Y and 35:A 4. Future pile repairs which are identifled in future inspection efforts. 3.2. Concrete Pile Cap Beams Observed Conditions: The Municipal Pier is made up of 36 bents of cast-in-place concrete pile caps. The pile caps are 3’-0” high by 2’-8” wide. They are 18’-4” long for the flrst 33 bents and spaced at 32’-0” on center. Bents 34 to 36 are spaced at 25’-0” on center. The pile cap at Bent 34 is 48’-4” long and the pile caps are 52’-2” long at Bents 35 and 36. Prior concrete repairs can be seen on many of the pile caps. Overall, the pile caps are in Fair condition. Overall, approximately 17% of the pile caps do not have any new visible damage and 83% of the pile caps have Minor to Moderate corrosion defects. There are approximately 27 pile caps that have Closed Corrosion Spalls (see Photo 15) and an additional 3 pile caps that have Page 197 of 1126 9 Open Corrosion Spalls (see Photo 16). The spalling that was observed usually occurs along the bottom of the pile cap and at the pile cap ends. Structural Significance: The pile caps are a critical vertical and lateral load carrying element. They transfer all the deck vertical loads to the piles and tie the piles together to share lateral (wave or seismic) loads in the transverse direction. The pile caps are continuous across all piles at each bent in a series of very short spans. Due to the short span length, the bottom reinforcing is less critical than the top reinforcing. For this reason, minor deterioration of soffit reinforcing does not create a signiflcant reduction in load capacity. The estimated reduction in pile cap load capacity is 5% or less for all bents. Repair Recommendations: Spall repairs are recommended within the next 3 to 5 years for all the pile cap bents except for 6 pile caps (Bents 1, 2, 12, 25, 30, and 32). A second round of pile cap spall repairs is anticipated to be required in 5 to 10 years. See Appendix D, Pages D-47 and D-48 for a list of the locations of pile cap defects for which repairs are recommended. Although the pile caps currently have a reduced capacity of 5% or less, we recommend their repair, prior to signiflcant loss of the rebar section, to avoid a much higher future repair cost if rebar replacement is needed. Left alone, the corrosion deterioration accelerates. 3.3. Concrete Deck Panels Observed Conditions: The deck of the Municipal Pier is constructed with 156 hollow precast concrete panels. The panels are 1’-5” thick by 5’-0” wide with four 10.5” diameter hollow Sonovoid Tubes in the middle of each panel. Between Bents 1 and 34, the panels are 32’ long with 4 panels placed side by side. Between Bents 34 and 36, the panels have an overall length of 34’ (25’ span between pile caps plus a 9’ cantilever overhang) and 6 additional panels have been added to produce the wider pier end. Each deck panel is connected to its adjacent panels with a concrete grout shear key. Additionally, a steel tie rod connects the panels typically at midspan (see Figure 7). The Engineers visually inspected the top, underside and edges of the concrete deck panels. The Engineers also sounded the surfaces of the deck panels with a hammer or solid steel headed putter to identify areas of delaminated, weak, damaged, or Page 198 of 1126 10 spalled concrete. Shallow delamination (separation of material into layers) in the concrete deck panels can be found by tapping a hammer on the surface of the concrete producing a distinct sound. This sound will allow the user to distinguish the difference between delaminated and solid concrete. Delaminated surfaces make a dull or hollow sound and solid concrete surfaces make a clear ringing sound. Many of the panels were observed to have existing patches, especially between panel joints. There is typically rust bleeding present at the edges of the patches on the soffit. Overall, the deck panels are in Poor to Serious condition. Corrosion Spalls: Approximately 75% of the deck panel soffits have at least one area of Closed Corrosion Spalling, typically along the panel edges (see Photos 17, 18 and 29). Approximately 7 panel soffits also exhibit Open Corrosion Spalling (see Photo 27-28). Approximately 70% of the deck panel tops have areas with shallow spalls and delamination, representing approximately 12% of the total top deck area (see Photo 30). Deck Fractures: Approximately 20 deck panels have Serious deterioration, typically due to overstress damage because of overload from a wheel or outrigger point load. There are approximately 13 panels that exhibit fractures from overloading, typically evident by continuous splits in the concrete along the panel edges and by vertical offsets either internally along the fracture or between adjacent panels (see Photos 21-26). A few of the panels with fractures have a large missing section of concrete at the fracture, typically with exposed reinforcing with Moderate section loss (see Photos 19-20). Approximately 7 panels have a signiflcant area of weak and delaminated concrete. Deck Cracking: Approximately 67% of the deck panel soffits have transverse full width cracks greater than 0.016” wide; approximately 45% of those deck panel soffits also exhibit longitudinal cracking greater than 0.016” wide. Approximately 67% of the deck panel tops have transverse full width cracks greater than 0.016” wide (see Photos 31-32); approximately 12 of those panels also have longitudinal cracks greater than 0.016” wide. The transverse cracks are indicative of fiexural stress and shrinkage. Shear Keys: Spalling was observed on the topside between deck panels at the shear key at approximately 14 locations. Vertical offsets between deck panels were observed at the soffit at approximately 6 additional locations. This indicates that the shear key has failed at these locations and therefore the deck panels at these locations are not adequately sharing loads. Uneven Deck Elevation: The deck appears to dip in elevation at Bent 13. There was a slight elevation drop at Bent 13 shown in photos taken in 2012. In 2017, the drop appeared to be larger. We recommend that this elevation drop be reviewed during the next routine pier inspection in case pile settlement is ongoing. Speciflcally, we recommend obtaining Page 199 of 1126 11 elevation measurements of the deck at Bent 13 within the next year that can then be compared to measurements taken in the future. Assuming that the recommended high priority repairs are completed, we recommend inspecting the Municipal Pier at 5-year intervals as discussed below. The next routine inspection should occur in Fall 2029. Structural Significance: The deck panels provide the flrst and most important means to distribute pedestrian and vehicle loads to the pile caps and piles below. If the deck panels are not maintained, a safety hazard will develop. The transverse hairline cracks on the bottom of the panels near their centerline are Minor because the bottoms of the panels are in tension and the steel reinforcing is carrying the fiexural loads. However, longitudinal cracking and corrosion spalling on the bottom face of the panels is signiflcant. This spalling is indicative of corrosion of the fiexural reinforcing and can result in diminished capacity. Based on the level of rust bleeding, the current closed nature of the spalling, and location on the extreme edges of the panels, the deck panels with minor cracking have an estimated 5% to 10% loss in capacity. The pier was originally designed to support a 10-ton truck. Due to the observed deck shear key failures, the current 5-ton load rating for the pier has assumed that a wheel load placed near a panel edge is supported entirely by the loaded panel, without assistance from adjacent panels. This assumption may be conservative in bays with in-tact shear keys. The 7 panels with Signiflcant areas of weak and delaminated concrete and the 13 panels with overloading fractures and displacements are a Serious concern. These panels have an estimated loss of capacity of 50% which is the basis for the current 5-Ton Load Limit (half of the original design 10-Ton Load Limit). As such, it is crucial that these panels are repaired or replaced in the next 1 to 2 years to avoid further load restrictions. Repair Recommendations: Within the next 1 to 2 years, we recommend replacing 4 deck panels that have experienced Severe overstress damage. Within the next 2 years we recommend repairing approximately 14 deck panels with an FRP laminate where Signiflcant delamination has occurred. Within the next 3 to 5 years, we recommend crack injection and spall repairs to portions of approximately 45% of deck panel soffits and 90% of deck panel tops where large fiexural cracks, closed corrosion spalling, and open corrosion spalling have occurred. Due to the high cost of scaffolding, we recommend that all panel soffits in a bay be repaired at the same time. See Appendix D, Pages D-125 to D-131 for a complete list of the locations of recommended deck panel repairs. Page 200 of 1126 12 3.4. Railing Observed Conditions: Wooden railing on the steel guardrail condition was generally acceptable. However, several screws connecting the wood to the steel guardrail with the base plates were found missing as can be seen in the following photos. In September 2025, the City’s Public Works Department inspected and replaced all missing railing screws. 3.7n Missing screws between Bents 1-2 (North side) 3.7o Missing screws between Bents 8-12 (North side) 3.7p & q Guardrail post to structure bolts acceptable Page 201 of 1126 13 Structural Significance: All the wooden guardrails have been replaced recently as they are an important pier safety feature. The railings should be properly secured to the steel railing system. Repair Recommendations: None currently. 3.5. Lifeguard Storage Area Observed Conditions: The CMU wall is a part of the Lifeguard Storage building that is located below the deck at the beginning of the Pier in the flrst three bays, starting with a low height retaining wall. See Photos 3.5a to 3.5e below. The CMU wall was found to be anchored laterally at the top from the bent, where available or the slab soffit—see Photos 3.5f to 3.5h below. Clearly the wall is a non-load bearing structure, as the pier slab is independently supported by the bents and the end retaining wall. 3.5a Panoramic view between bents 2 & 3 3.5b Panoramic view between bents 1 & 2 Page 202 of 1126 14 3.5c Panoramic view between bents 1 & retaining wall—looking at retaining wall 3.5d Panoramic view between bents 1 & retaining wall--looking parallel to retaining wall. 3.5e Panoramic view between bents 1 & 2 3.5f East view looking at Bent 2 and beyond Page 203 of 1126 15 3.5g Lateral support of CMU wall from bent 3.5h Lateral support of CMU wall from slab soffit There were marks of running water with effervescence possibly from superstructure concrete. Minor signs if effervescence see Photos 3.5i to 3.5k. There was no sign of dampness nor rust, barring one or two places due to a metallic object being hung from it, though now removed. Generally, the condition of the CMU wall was healthy. 3.5i Minor signs if effervescence at bottom left of photo 3.5j Close up of CMU wall between Bent 2 & 3—minor rust marks due to old metallic object hung on the wall, now removed Page 204 of 1126 16 3.5k Marks of running water with effervescence possibly from superstructure concrete Slab soffit within lifeguard storage room Bents 1 to 3 & retaining wall All three bays the slab soffit showed signs of water damage. Between Bents 2 & 3 the soffit had been painted over relatively recently, and cracks were hidden, but water damage to paint was evident See Photos 3.5k & 3.5l. In other bays, where there is no painting done, the fiexural cracks are evident like the slab soffits outside lifeguard enclosure, past Bent 3. There are also telltale marks of cracks being studied by a previous team highlighting crack locations. There are widespread water running marks along with effervescence. 3.5k Red marks on ceiling indicative of cracks being studied by a previous team 3.5l Widespread effervescence indicative of potential corrosion activity in slab Page 205 of 1126 17 Structural Significance: There are no signs of structural signiflcance to the pier even with observance of widespread effervescence. Repair Recommendations: No structural repairs are recommended currently. 3.6. Utility Lines Observed Conditions: It was observed that the clamps securing the electrical conduit to the deck were missing or detached at the following locations: • Bent 25.3 on North side face (Photo 3.6a) • Bent 25.7 on North side face (Photo 3.6b) • Bent 29.3 on North side soffit (Photo 3.6c) • Bent 29.3 on South side soffit (Photo 3.6d) 3.6a Bent 25.3 on North side face 3.6b Bent 25.7 on North side face 3.6c Bent 29.3 on North side soffit 3.6d Bent 29.3 on South side soffit The water line on the South side of the soffit has a steady drip leak at the following splice locations: Page 206 of 1126 18 • Bent 27.5 (Photo 3.6e) • Bent 31.5 (Photo 3.6f) 3.6e Bent 27.5 steady drip leak 3.6f Bent 31.5 steady drip leak Structural Significance: The missing conduit clamps and leaking water lines have a minimal effect on the pier structure. Repair Recommendations: We recommend replacing the missing electrical conduit clamps at Bents 25 and 29 and repairing the leaking water lines as part of the upcoming pier repair project while the slab soffits are being repaired utilizing underdeck scaffolding. 3.7. Embedded Plaques Observed Conditions: The plaques were found to be installed only between bents 13 and 18, both on North and South faces, see Photos 3.7a & 3.7b below. There were some “missing” plaque locations, that are potential water ingress points Photo 3.7c. Also, plaques that have been installed show signs that the waterproof treatment around them has been compromised at several locations or missing all together forming a source of water into the structure below (Photos 3.7d & 3.7e) Page 207 of 1126 19 3.7a South side plaques 3.7b North side plaques 3.7c Potential plaque location—possible water ingress points 3.7d & 3.7e Typical plaque showing gaps in waterprooflng seal around its perimeter or missing entirely Structural Significance: Plaques are non-structural architectural appendages. Their installation typically requires damaging portions of the concrete cover through chase cutting, as they must remain fiush with the walking surface to avoid becoming tripping hazards. We do not recommend cutting into the deck concrete, especially since there is no topping slab present. Such modiflcations may compromise the protective cover over the reinforcing steel in the panels and other exposed elements. Water ingress through these areas can lead to corrosion. Page 208 of 1126 20 Cracked edges, as shown in Photo 3.7d, may persist even after proper sealing. All polymers used for sealing have a limited lifespan when exposed to sunlight and UV radiation. Once the sealant deteriorates and cracks, water ingress becomes inevitable. From a durability and long-term maintenance perspective, embedding plaques into the pier’s concrete deck is no longer advisable. Repair Recommendations: In consultation with the City, it has been decided to prohibit further installation of plaques on the deck and to remove the existing ones. The removal of plaques leaves recesses or craters in the deck surface, which should be properly sealed using polymer-modifled cement mortar to prevent water ingress and deterioration. Moving forward, both existing and future plaques will be installed on the handrails instead of the deck. 3.8. Light Fixtures Observed Conditions: One low height light pole was found to be tilted over and needs repair. 3.7f Tilted Light Standard at Bent (South face) 3.7g Possible old location of light standard—water ingress Page 209 of 1126 21 3.7h & i Light standard at gate on the pier having anchor bolts at wrong holes Structural Significance: Light flxtures are non-structural architectural features. When installed these require concrete cover portions to be damaged by drilling of holes. As stated before, there is no “topping” concrete slab above the structural slab, so installation of the light flxtures damages the structural concrete members. For the given situation, the best that can be done is repair any potential water ingress points to reduce corrosion. Repair Recommendations: For safety reasons, it’s important to ensure all the light standards are securely fastened to the pier deck. The City should routinely check under normal maintenance that lights are being held flrm and upright and replace missing anchor bolts. We also recommend monitoring cracks and repairing them with appropriate sealants. No signiflcant cracks were observed at this time, and no further action is required at this point. Page 210 of 1126 22 3.9. Benches Observed Conditions: Virtually all benches on both the north and south edges of the pier have empty holes in existing cleats, both to the ground as well as the legs. When either the fasteners or cleats or both are rusted, the following table shows they need attention: Benches between Bent # Replace number of bench anchorages (also number of legs affected); “-“ indicates no bench; OK indicates sound condition; greater than one line in a bent pair indicates additional benches South North 1-2 - Replace 4 9-10 - Replace 1 10-11 OK Replace 3 11-12 Replace 2 Replace 1 12-13 Replace 1 Replace 2 Replace 4 OK 13-14 Replace 3 OK 18-19 Replace 2 Replace 4 19-20 Replace 4 Replace 4 Replace 4 - 20-21 Replace 4 Replace 2 22-23 - Replace 4 23-24 - Replace 4 3.7j Example: North face bench between Bents 1&2 needs replacement 3.7k Missing bolts Page 211 of 1126 23 3.7l Rusted anchorages 3.7m Rusted anchors and bolt holes in deck beyond Structural Significance: As stated already, any penetration into the pier’s deck is the start of future concrete and steel deterioration. Repair Recommendations: Within the next 2 years, replace all the bench anchorages as denoted in the table. Remove the affected benches and reinstall them using an approved methodology that does not involve drilling holes into the deck or creating potential leak points. 3.10. Staircase Observed Conditions: The external staircase has classic marks of rainwater running on the soffit of the slab due to capillary action, see Photos 3.7r to 3.7t. The soffit had previously been painted over, but upon request, the paint was removed, revealing a structural crack-- Photo 3.7u. The crack appears to be fiexural in nature, possibly resulting from corrosion that has reduced the effective area of reinforcing steel available for bending. This crack should be repaired using the same methodology applied to the deck panels, including flber- reinforced polymer (FRP) strengthening. Page 212 of 1126 24 3.7r Rust marks at top of column 3.7s 3.7t 3.7u Page 213 of 1126 25 Structural Significance: For staircase, there is visible corrosion and immediate maintenance should occur. See repair recommendations below. Repair Recommendations: A drip course can be provided at soffits where water tends to fiow beneath to prevent further damage. This applies to staircase structure and other slab and even pile cap soffits. This is a one-time flx and should be a part of the Pier Repair Plans. 4. SENSEQUAKE TESTING COMPARISON Sensequake and JMC2 conducted ambient vibration testing of the four deck panels between Bents 10 and 11 in November 2024. Sensequake summarized their conclusions in a PowerPoint presentation provided on January 13, 2025. Sensequake provided color-coded graphics of the structure showing their deterioration conclusions based on the scale shown to the right. Sensequake subsequently tested all the panels in an additional 9 bays in March of 2025; the bays tested were 12-13, 13-14, 15-16, 18-19, 21- 22, 27-28, 30-11, 32-33, and 35-36. Sensequake summarized their conclusions in a PowerPoint presentation provided in PDF format on May 2, 2025. Sensequake provided “heat maps” for both the vertical and transverse mode shapes, which summarized their conclusions on the level of deterioration in each tested zone of the tested deck panels. On May 12, 2025, Sensequake also provided separated vertical and transverse “heat maps” for Bent 10 to 11. 4.1. Concrete Piles Sensequake Analysis Results: Sensequake concluded that the Piles at Bent 11 have Minor Deterioration and the Piles at Bent 10 have Moderate Deterioration. For the additional 9 bays tested between Bents 12 and 36, substructure conclusions were provided only at Bents 21 and 32. Sensequake concluded that there is High Deterioration of the pile cap and/or piles at Bents 21 and 32. Visual and Tactile Observations at the Sensequake testing locations: ESN Engineering observed Minor Closed Corrosion Spalling at the tops of Piles 10:A, 10:C, and 11:C. In 2023, Pile 10:E was repaired with a grout-fllled flberglass jacket from the mudline to the underside of the pile cap. Pile 11:A was previously repaired with a tight flberglass wrap at the top and a grout fllled flberglass jacket approximately 2 feet above the mudline. Pile 11:E was previously repaired with a grout-fllled flberglass jacket from the mudline to the underside of the pile cap. In 2023, eight stainless steel straps were installed around the jacket at Pile 11:E to Sensequake Deterioration Rating Scale Page 214 of 1126 26 secure it in place due to a vertical split; ESN Engineering observed flve diagonal cracks in the grout across the jacket split. ESN Engineering did not observe any notable defects at Piles 21:A, 21:B, and 32:E. ESN Engineering observed an existing flberglass pile jacket at Pile 32:B and flberglass pile jackets constructed in 2023 on Piles 21:E, 32:A and 32:D. ESN Engineering noted a Moderate vertical crack in the outboard face of Pile 21:D. Results Comparison and Conclusions: ESN Engineering does not recommend any repairs during the next 5 years to the piles in Bents 10, 11, 21, and 32, nor is there justiflcation to reduce the current pier load rating based on the conditions of these piles. In 5 to 10 years, repairs will likely be required for the deteriorated jacket at Pile 11:E. ESN Engineering does not consider the deterioration in the piles in Bents 10, 11, 21 or 32 to be Signiflcant. It is possible that Sensequake is seeing abnormal behavior in these piles and differing behavior between adjacent bents because of various types of jacket repairs modifying the relative stiffness of the jacketed piles compared to the original prestressed concrete piles. The Sensequake analysis does not individually model the unbraced pile heights, which change with water depth, the depth to the stiff formational soil layer at each bent and the variation of top of deck elevation. Longer piles are less stiff than shorter piles and could appear to have excessive fiexibility, interpreted as a deteriorated element, as opposed to a change in relative stiffness. ESN Engineering considers the deterioration in the piles at Bent 10 to be Minor; whereas Sensequake has categorized that same deterioration as Moderate – this difference should be considered negligible based on the different rating scales used. ESN Engineering has used the ASCE Manual 130 rating scales (see Appendix F) and Sensequake has used a frequency-based rating scale for the vertical modes and a curvature distortion scale for the transverse modes. ESN Engineering considers the deterioration in the piles at Bents 21 and 32 to be Minor; whereas Sensequake has categorized that same deterioration as High, which carries a general recommendation for repairs in the mid-term timeframe. (Note that the Sensequake scale recommends short-term repairs for areas with Severe deterioration). It is possible that the Sensequake testing has identifled fiexibility in the soil-pile interaction at these piles; however, ESN Engineering did not observe settlement damage in the substructure. It should be noted that Bent 13 appears to have settled but Sensequake did not note excessive fiexibility in the Bent 13 substructure. It is possible that the soil interaction is more fiexible at Bents 21 and 32 but has not resulted in any movement. ESN Engineering recommends that these bents be carefully checked for signs of settlement during the next routine pier inspection. Page 215 of 1126 27 Since the Sensequake testing was focused on the deck panels, the data provided for piling was limited; the correlation between the Sensequake pile conclusions and the visual observations was Poor. As such, ESN Engineering found no justiflcation for adjusting our pile repair recommendations at this time. 4.2. Concrete Pile Cap Beams Sensequake Analysis Results: Sensequake concluded that the Pile Cap at Bent 11 has Moderate Deterioration. For the additional 9 bays tested between Bents 12 and 36, substructure conclusions were provided only at Bents 21 and 32. Sensequake concluded that there is High Deterioration of the pile cap and/or piles at Bents 21 and 32. Visual and Tactile Observations at the Sensequake testing locations: ESN Engineering observed Minor corrosion spalling on the faces of the pile caps at Bents 10, 11, and 21. ESN Engineering did not observe any notable defects in the pile cap at Bent 32. Results Comparison and Conclusions: ESN Engineering recommends making concrete spall repairs during the next 3-5 years to the pile caps at Bents 10, 11 and 21. Although the pile caps currently have a reduced capacity of 5% or less, we have recommended spall repairs be conducted prior to signiflcant loss of the rebar section to avoid a much higher cost repair. ESN Engineering considers the deterioration in the pile cap at Bent 11 to be Minor, whereas Sensequake has categorized that same deterioration as Moderate. ESN Engineering considers the deterioration in the pile caps at Bent 21 and 32 to be Minor, whereas Sensequake has categorized that same deterioration as High. It is possible that deteriorated deck panel ends or inadequate lateral connections of deck panels to the pile caps are triggering some of Sensequake’s conclusions that some of the pile caps have High Deterioration. Refer to the Concrete Pile Results Comparison and Conclusions section above for additional discussion on the differences between the Sensequake substructure and visual / tactile substructure conclusions. Since the Sensequake testing was focused on the deck panels, the data provided for pile cap beams was limited; the correlation between the Sensequake pile cap conclusions and the visual observations was Poor. As such, ESN Engineering found no justiflcation for adjusting our pile cap repair recommendations at this time. 4.3. Concrete Deck Panels Sensequake Analysis Results: Sensequake divided each of the deck panels into four sections, creating a total of 16 sections for their analysis of typical 4-panel bents. Between Bents 10 and 11, Sensequake concluded that 9 of the 16 sections have Minor Deterioration and the remaining 7 sections have Moderate Deterioration. Sensequake also concluded that Page 216 of 1126 28 the shear key between Panels C and D (the two southmost panels) has High Deterioration. Sensequake recommended that the areas showing High Deterioration should be evaluated but did not recommend any speciflc repairs. For the additional bays tested between Bents 12 and 36, Sensequake concluded that the panels in the vertical mode exhibit: • Slight to Minor Deterioration in Bay 12-13. • Slight to Moderate Deterioration in Bays 13-14, 15-16, 18-19, 21-22, 30-31 & 35-36. • Slight to High Deterioration in Bays 27-28 & 32-33. Sensequake concluded that the panels in the transverse mode exhibit: • Slight to Moderate Deterioration in Bays 13-14 & 18-19. • Slight to High Deterioration in Bays 27-28 & 35-36. • Minor to High Deterioration in Bays 12-13, 15-16 & 21-22. • Minor to Severe Deterioration in Bays 30-31 & 32-33. Visual and Tactile Observations at the Sensequake testing locations: Between Bents 10 and 11, ESN Engineering observed longitudinal and transverse cracking on the east ends of the soffits of Panels A, B, and C, indicative of overload damage. There is a noticeable vertical offset along the overload cracks in Panels A and C. The soffits of Panels B and C also had Moderate Closed Corrosion Spalling at the intersection with the pile cap at Bent 10 along the longitudinal panel edges. Panel D has three Minor transverse cracks in the east end of the soffit that extend to the south face of the panel. ESN Engineering observed between two to four Minor to Moderate transverse cracks on the top surface of all four panels at their west end. Typically, the deck panels are longitudinally tied together across the pile cap top pour strip with dowels from both deck panels and the pile cap; this detailing allows the deck panels to act as continuous beams across the pile cap at Bent 11. As such, the top transverse cracking at the west end is indictive of fiexural stress in this negative bending region. ESN Engineering also observed that a large light pole has been removed from Panel A, as evidenced by a large diameter of abandoned anchor bolts on the deck surface, above the location of soffit overload cracking. Note: Bent 10 is one of three locations along the length of the pier, which has a transverse deck expansion joint with detailing to allow rotation between subsequent deck panels (the end of the panel intersecting the expansion joint acts as a simple beam as opposed to the typical continuous beam behavior). Per the 1965 as-built drawings, these panels do not Page 217 of 1126 29 appear to have additional bottom longitudinal reinforcing, which if present, may have provided additional capacity where the beam behavior changes. For the bays tested between Bents 12 and 36, ESN Engineering observed the following range of deterioration: Panel Soffits • Minor to Moderate transverse and longitudinal cracking. • Minor to Moderate Closed Corrosion Spalling. • Moderate to Severe Open Corrosion Spalling. • Signiflcant areas of weak and delaminated concrete. • Major to Severe overstress fractures with vertical offsets between panels/fractures. Panel Tops • Minor to Moderate transverse and longitudinal cracking. • Shallow spalling and Minor delamination. • Minor to Moderate shear key spalling. Results Comparison and Conclusions: ESN Engineering recommends repairing the Closed Corrosion Spalls in the panel soffits near Bent 10 and repairing the larger cracks with epoxy injection. ESN Engineering also recommends strengthening the overloaded deck panels between Bents 10 and 11 with a flberglass laminate. For the bays tested between Bents 12 and 36, ESN Engineering recommends the following types of deck panel repairs: • Crack injection and spall repairs. • Strengthening of deck panels with flberglass laminate. • Replacement of 4 deck panels with Severe overstress fractures. ESN Engineering found that in the vertical mode, there was a Good correlation between the Sensequake conclusions and our visual conclusions in 30% of the tested bays and that the correlation was Poor in the remaining 70% of bays. For the transverse mode, we found that the correlation was Fair in 50% of the bays and Poor in the remaining 50% of bays. The bays with Good correlation assisted ESN Engineering with making more precise conclusions regarding the severity of the deterioration that was observed, both in the panels with Good correlation as well as in other panels with similar defects. ESN Engineering has considered possible reasons for the Poor correlation in some bays and offers the following professional opinions which require physical destructive testing to prove, which is beyond the scope of this activity. It is possible that some of the Poor Page 218 of 1126 30 correlation is due to previous internal repairs that are concealed by new deck topping, the shear keys providing connectivity and good load sharing between adjacent panels in some bays, or possibly some deterioration resulting in less of a capacity reduction than initially thought. Sensequake concluded that the deck panels between Bents 10 and 11 have deterioration ranging from Minor to Moderate. The correlation was Poor between the areas that ESN Engineering observed as having signs of overload damage or fiexural stress and the areas that Sensequake identifled as having Moderate deterioration. It is possible that the shear keys and past grout injection repairs have bonded some of the internal delamination and are helping to share load between panels. Sensequake also noted that the shear key between Panels C and D has High Deterioration. ESN Engineering did not observe signs of shear key failure at this location, such as differential settlement between adjacent panels, longitudinal cracking along the joint or spalling along the joint, except for a Minor Closed Corrosion Spall at the east end. In Panels 12-13:B, 12-13:C, 15-16:B, and 18-19:A the Good correlation between the Sensequake conclusions and our visual observations showed that the overstress fractures in the panel soffits with wide shear and fiexural cracks and vertical defiections have less interior deterioration that appears from the surface, allowing ESN Engineering to recommend spall repairs and epoxy crack injection repairs with FRP laminate strengthening for these panels in lieu of complete panel replacement. Although, the correlation between the Sensequake conclusions and visual observations was Poor in Bays 13-14, 21-22, and 27- 28, Sensequake’s conclusions regarding the overall level of deterioration in the bay in conjunction with matching visual deterioration levels with corresponding data, allowed ESN Engineering to recommend repairs instead of panel replacement. The correlation in Panels 30-31:C, 32-33:A, 32-33:C, and 35-36:B was Poor; however, the High Deterioration that Sensequake captured adjacent to Severe visual deterioration, helped ESN Engineering conflrm that panel replacement is required in those 4 panels. 4.4. GENERAL CONCLUSION STATEMENT ON SENSEQUAKE TESTING It is ESN Engineering’s opinion that Sensequake was a helpful tool in evaluating the deterioration observed by traditional means. The Sensequake testing showed that the remaining internal continuity of several of the deck panels in Severe condition is currently sufficient to allow for repairs as opposed to replacement-in-kind. The use of Sensequake modeling assisted ESN Engineering in our decision to revise our original recommendation to replace 13 panels to replace 4 panels and repair the remaining 9 panels with a combination Page 219 of 1126 31 of both FRP laminate strengthening and traditional spall repair and epoxy crack injection methods. ESN Engineering does not feel that Sensequake testing on its own can adequately identify all defects and areas of deterioration, nor can it adequately classify the level of deterioration as it relates to required repairs or speciflc reductions in load capacity. Sensequake cannot identify speciflc structural members requiring repair or the type and nature of the required repair; however, Sensequake can assist in determining the remaining interior continuity of areas that are not visible. Page 220 of 1126 32 5. COST / BENEFIT ANALYSIS The following summarizes the anticipated repair projects required to maintain the pier over the next 45 years, the cost for a new replacement pier, the assumptions used in the development of the cost estimates and schedules, our comparison of the costs to maintain the existing pier vs. a full pier replacement, and our recommendation for the optimal time to replace the pier. 5.1. Existing Pier: Maintenance / Repairs The following table provides a summary of the maintenance and repair costs that are anticipated to be required to maintain the pier over the next 45 years. The repairs have been grouped into reasonable projects that will typically occur in 5-year increments to reduce the number of individual construction mobilizations and minimize public impact. The budgetary cost estimates for each construction project include the costs of Routine and Design -Level Inspections, Design, Geotechnical Investigation, Environmental Permitting, Contract Administration, and Construction Support efforts (see Appendix E for line-item cost estimates for near term projects & Appendix G for line-item cost estimates and schedules for each recommended future repair project). Existing Pier Repair Costs (2025 – 2070) Year Estimated Repair Costs including Inflation Cumulative Repair Costs including Inflation See Appendices for Detailed Cost Estimates 2027 $ 3,511,000 $ 3,511,000 Pages E-2 & E-3 2030 $ 3,916,000 $ 7,427,000 Pages E-4 & E-5 2035 $ 6,490,000 $ 13,917,000 Pages G-2 & G-3 2040 $ 9,459,000 $ 23,376,000 Pages G-4 & G-5 2045 $ 12,641,000 $ 36,017,000 Pages G-6 & G-7 2050 $ 17,654,000 $ 53,671,000 Pages G-8 & G-9 2055 $ 23,706,000 $ 77,377,000 Pages G-10 & G-11 2060 $ 31,676,000 $ 109,053,000 Pages G-12 & G-13 2065 $ 43,512,000 $ 152,565,000 Pages G-14 & G-15 2070 $ 57,670,000 $ 210,235,000 Pages G-16 & G-17 5.2. Replacement Pier: Cost Estimate The cost of the new replacement pier is anticipated to be $44.5 million (in 2025 Dollars) (see Appendix G, Pages G-18 and G-19 for full cost estimate and schedule). The budgetary cost estimate includes the cost for the demolition of the existing pier and construction of a full Page 221 of 1126 33 replacement pier. The budgetary cost estimate includes the costs of Planning, Surveying, Design, Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental Permitting, Contract Administration, and Construction Support efforts. The schedule assumes that the planning, public outreach, and environmental assessment efforts will take several years to complete prior to the design, permitting, and construction of the new pier. 5.3. Analysis Assumptions The following assumptions have been used in the preparation of the budgetary cost estimates for the existing pier repairs and new replacement pier construction. i. All recommended future repairs have been grouped into projects that will typically occur at 5-year intervals to reduce the number of individual construction mobilizations and minimize public impact. ii. A 30% Construction Contingency Cost has been applied to all cost estimates. iii. All costs were developed based on 2025 estimated construction costs and have been adjusted for infiation using a 4% average infiation increase. iv. The analysis assumes that the existing pier will be maintained at the current load rating with no major changes to use and that the recommended projects will be carried out at the recommended intervals. v. The new pier will have approximately the same dimensions as the existing pier (1,140’ long x 20’ wide with widened end) which is approximately 25,000 square feet. For an apples-to-apples comparison, upgraded features (such as a larger footprint, additional amenities on the pier, etc.) have not been incorporated into this analysis. vi. The new pier will have the same approximate height as the existing pier, which adequately accounts for future Sea Level Rise concerns. vii. This analysis assumes that maintaining some pier access during the construction of a new pier is important. An allotment for anticipated phasing costs has been included in the new pier cost estimate. The details of how phasing will be implemented, and the alignment of the new pier are not a part of this analysis. viii. Local economic impact of pier closures has not been considered in this analysis. The City may choose to adjust the timing of the pier replacement to consider the detrimental value which pier closures for repairs have on public access and economic impact to the community. ix. After the new pier is built and in service, the piles of the existing pier will be cut-off at the current seafioor elevation (as opposed to being fully removed or cut-off a foot or two below the mudline, which would incur additional cost) x. A full CEQA Environmental Assessment will be required for the new pier and will likely be a 2-3 year long process. xi. Repair costs will be very low to zero for the new pier during the flrst 15 to 20 years of its life. Page 222 of 1126 34 xii. Notable repair projects will cease once the planning for the new pier begins in anticipation of the new structure, i.e., once it is determined that the pier will be replaced, repairs will only be performed to maintain the pier capacity until the new pier is constructed. The costs of those repairs as well as alternative approaches which consider partial pier access restrictions and temporary structural improvements have been included in the analysis. Repairs that would extend the life of the pier beyond construction of a new facility will not be performed. xiii. The Budgetary Costs are based upon commonly prescribed repair methods and the historical cost estimating experience of the estimators. For validation, costs have been compared to previous bidding information available for similar pier repair work. The Budgetary Costs and Engineering Estimates are not guarantees of contractor pricing for future work. xiv. The analysis and cost estimates cannot and do not predict future global and economic effects on the infiation of materials and labor nor do they address acts of accidental overload or Acts-of-God such as high surf or seismic events which can partially or destroy a pier. xv. Modiflcation of the approach roadway alignment and pierhead plaza improvements are outside the scope of this pier cost/beneflt analysis. xvi. Modiflcations, upgrades and replacement of the LA County Fire Department building & Lifeguard tower, garage and parking are outside the scope of this pier cost/beneflt analysis. xvii. The analysis assumes that the City will seek grants to assist with the funding of the new pier and that the grant research and applications will be prepared by City staff; the cost of minimal consultant assistance has been added to the new pier cost estimate. All cost estimates show the full anticipated cost with no reduction for external funding sources and do not consider how funding will be provided. xviii. The analysis uses a 45-year evaluation period to compare maintenance, repair and new construction costs. xix. The analysis assumes that regular minor monthly maintenance (outside of major capital improvement project repairs) is minimal and likely similar for both the existing pier and a new pier. As such, minor routine maintenance costs have not been included in the analysis. For the planning of a future replacement pier, we recommend incorporating lessons learned from maintaining the current pier into the design. xx. The primary goal of this analysis is to determine the optimal economic timing for replacement of the pier. 5.4. Analysis Summary To determine the most cost-efficient timing for the City to replace the pier with new construction, we created a spreadsheet which compares the anticipated maintenance and Page 223 of 1126 35 construction costs for the pier each year for the next 45 years based on what year the pier is replaced. We analyzed 45 different scenarios, one for each calendar year from 2026 to 2070, determining the total costs over the next 45 years if the pier is replaced in that year (see Appendix G, Pages G-34 to G-37). The costs include maintenance projects for the current pier, the cost of a new facility, and the costs of maintaining the new facility (which are very low for the flrst 15 to 20 years following new construction). The analysis shown on Pages G-34 to G-37 shows the estimated pier costs (including estimated infiation for the year the cost will occur) for each year over the next 45 years (green vertical axis) for 45 different scenarios – each scenario is for the replacement of the pier in that year (blue horizontal axis). The total estimated pier cost for each replacement year scenario is shown at the top of each column in orange and is a sum of the 45 annual costs in that column. The analysis incorporates engineering judgement based on carefully calculated unit prices and individual project estimates. The costs are derived from the detailed cost estimates shown on Pages E-2 to E-5 and G-2 to G-33 for the recommended maintenance projects to maintain the existing pier, the cost of a new pier, and the cost of maintenance projects on the new pier after the pier is replaced (very minor to begin and becoming more notable approximately 15 years after new pier construction). To reflne the analysis by year, the cost of maintenance projects that typically occur every flve years are divided into yearly costs over the period between maintenance projects. Similarly, the cost of the new pier construction is spread across several years since most of the soft costs will occur years prior to construction and the construction costs themselves will be distributed over a 2-to-3-year period. Repair projects on the existing pier are applied typically until 5 years before the pier is replaced. Engineering judgment is applied to adjust the costs for the last major project prior to replacement to focus on maintaining safety until replacement and minor maintenance costs have been included where appropriate. The overall savings of new construction are typically not fully seen until approximately 15 to 20 years after construction of the new facility as shown in the following graph, which compares total pier costs for the scenario where the pier is replaced in 2032 vs. the scenario where the pier is not replaced. It should also be noted that in the year 2070 the existing pier will reach an age of 105 years and will likely have no remaining useful service life. Page 224 of 1126 36 The following two graphs show the total pier costs for the next 45 years based on what year the pier is replaced. The flrst graph includes all the replacement years considered (2026 through 2070) and shows that the total costs are relatively similar for pier replacement within the next 10 years but will start to signiflcantly increase in 2039. This shows that the existing pier has approximately 10 years of cost-efficient life remaining and the City has fiexibility over the next 10 years to select a replacement year without a notable cost increase. The second graph focuses on 2026 through 2040 and is helpful in visualizing costs over the next 10 years. $- $50,000,000 $100,000,000 $150,000,000 $200,000,000 $250,000,000 Cost in DollarsYear Cumulative Pier Costs (2025 -2070) Replace Pier in 2032 Repair Existing Pier through 2070 Page 225 of 1126 37 The graph below shows that the total pier costs through 2070 are estimated to be $10 3.9 million if the pier is replaced in 2032. For comparison, the total pier cost is $106.1 million if the pier is replaced in 2030, $105.7 million if the pier is replaced in 2035, and $114.0 million if the pier is replaced in 2039. $80,000,000 $130,000,000 $180,000,000 $230,000,000 $280,000,000 $330,000,000 $380,000,000 $430,000,000 Cost in DollarsPier Replacement Year Total Pier Costs (2025 -2070) Based on Year that Pier is Replaced $103,000,000 $105,000,000 $107,000,000 $109,000,000 $111,000,000 $113,000,000 $115,000,000 $117,000,000 $119,000,000 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040Cost in DollarsPier Replacement Year Total Pier Costs (2025 -2070) Based on Year that Pier is Replaced Page 226 of 1126 38 5.5. Conclusions It is our recommendation that existing pier maintenance projects cease after the 2027 repair project is completed and the pier be replaced with new construction in the year 2032. The Near Term – High Priority 2027 repair project must be completed as planned to avoid a reduction in the current pier load rating, restriction of vehicle weight, or localized deck area closures. To break ground for construction of a new pier in 2032, planning studies, public outreach tasks, and environmental assessment studies will likely need to be started as early as 2026 to avoid partial pier closures. It is important to note that there is only a 4% total cost difference of pier replacement over the next 10 years, which gives the City fiexibility in choosing to replace the pier any year before 2036 without signiflcant additional cost over replacement in the optimal year 2032. If the pier is replaced in 2032, we recommend that the 2030 Near Term – Medium Priority recommended repair project not be fully implemented as outlined but instead the responsible Design Engineer should review the list of repairs and recommend a reduced scope of repairs with the only goal being to maintain public safety of the pier prior to demolition. The plan may include some isolated repairs, restricting access to parts of the pier, reducing the size of vehicles allowed on the pier, or temporary structural improvements. Page 227 of 1126 39 APPENDIX Appendix A: Location and Vicinity Maps Appendix B: Typical As-Built Drawings Appendix C: Photographs Appendix D: Field Notes Appendix E: Budgetary Cost Estimate & Estimated Repair Quantities Appendix F: Inspection Procedure Appendix G: Cost / Beneflt Analysis – Cost Estimates & Schedules Appendix H: Sensequake Panel Testing (October 2025) Page 228 of 1126 A-1 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC APPENDIX A: LOCATION AND VICINITY MAPS Page 229 of 1126 A-2LOCATION AND VICINITY MAPSLOCATION MAPVICINITYMAPMunicipal PierHermosa Beach, CANMunicipal PierHermosa Beach, CAPage 230 of 1126 B-1 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC APPENDIX B: TYPICAL AS-BUILT DRAWINGS Page 231 of 1126 1" = 20'PROJ NO:SCALE:DATE: 1-16-2025DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: ESNCHECKED BY: CDDMARKDATEDESCRIPTIONSHEET TITLECONSULTANTS12BA12ABMUNICIPAL PIER HERMOSA BEACH, CA 2024 ASSESSMENT 35 NEWBERRY CTMORTON, IL 61550508-954-3091B-2Page 232 of 1126 1" = 20'PROJ NO:SCALE:DATE: 1-16-2025DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: ESNCHECKED BY: CDDMARKDATEDESCRIPTIONSHEET TITLECONSULTANTS12BA12ABMUNICIPAL PIER HERMOSA BEACH, CA 2024 ASSESSMENT 35 NEWBERRY CTMORTON, IL 61550508-954-3091B-3Page 233 of 1126 1/4" = 1'-0" PROJ NO: SCALE: DATE: 1-16-2025 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: ESN CHECKED BY: CDD SHEET TITLE PROJECT MUNICIPAL PIER HERMOSA BEACH, CA 2024 ASSESSMENT35 NEWBERRY CT MORTON, IL 61550 508-954-3091 B-4 Page 234 of 1126 1/4" = 1'-0" PROJ NO: SCALE: DATE: 1-16-2025 DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: ESN CHECKED BY: CDD SHEET TITLE PROJECT MUNICIPAL PIER HERMOSA BEACH, CA 2024 ASSESSMENT35 NEWBERRY CT MORTON, IL 61550 508-954-3091 B-5 Page 235 of 1126 1/4" = 1'-0"PROJ NO:SCALE:DATE: 1-16-2025DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: ESNCHECKED BY: CDDMARKDATEDESCRIPTIONSHEET TITLECONSULTANTS12BA12ABMUNICIPAL PIER HERMOSA BEACH, CA 2024 ASSESSMENT 35 NEWBERRY CTMORTON, IL 61550508-954-3091B-6Page 236 of 1126 1/4" = 1'-0"PROJ NO:SCALE:DATE: 1-16-2025DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: ESNCHECKED BY: CDDMARKDATEDESCRIPTIONSHEET TITLECONSULTANTS12BA12ABMUNICIPAL PIER HERMOSA BEACH, CA 2024 ASSESSMENT 35 NEWBERRY CTMORTON, IL 61550508-954-3091B-7Page 237 of 1126 NOT TO SCALEPROJ NO:SCALE:DATE: 1-16-2025DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: ESNCHECKED BY: CDDMARKDATEDESCRIPTIONSHEET TITLECONSULTANTS12BA12ABMUNICIPAL PIER HERMOSA BEACH, CA 2024 ASSESSMENT 35 NEWBERRY CTMORTON, IL 61550508-954-3091B-8Page 238 of 1126 C-1 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC APPENDIX C: PHOTOGRAPHS Page 239 of 1126 C-2 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 1: Looking Southwest along the Hermosa Beach Pier. Photo 2: Looking Southwest along the Hermosa Beach Pier during the Beach Soffit Inspection. Page 240 of 1126 C-3 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 3: Looking West at Bent 29 showing 3 Fiberglass Jacket Pile Repairs completed in 2023. Photo 4: Looking West at Bent 31 showing an older generation Fiberglass Jacket Pile Repair. Page 241 of 1126 C-4 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 5: Looking West at Pile 15:A, Cleaned of Marine Growth at Mudline for Level II Inspection. Photo 6: Looking East at Octagonal Pile Wrap at Pile 3:A and Closed Corrosion Spall in Pile Cap. Page 242 of 1126 C-5 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 7: Looking Southeast at Steel Pile Jacket at Pile 16:A. Photo 8: Looking East at Steel Strap Repair at Split Fiberglass Jacket on Pile 11:E. Page 243 of 1126 C-6 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 9: Looking Southeast at Deterioration in Bottom of Fiberglass Jacket at Pile 35:G Photo 10: Looking Southeast at Open Corrosion Spall at Top of Pile 34:F Page 244 of 1126 C-7 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 11: Looking Southeast at Open Corrosion Spall at Top of Pile 23:B. Photo 12: Looking West at Closed Corrosion Spall at top of Pile 36:C. Page 245 of 1126 C-8 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 13: Looking at Bottom of Fiberglass Jacket at Pile 32:A, 1’ above Mudline. Photo 14: Looking at Bottom of Concrete Pile 34:Z at Mudline, Clean of Marine Growth. Page 246 of 1126 C-9 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 15: Looking Southeast at Closed Corrosion Spall in Pile Cap above Pile 13:A at Northwest end. Photo 16: Looking Southwest at Open Corrosion Spall in Pile Cap above Pile 13:A at Northeast end. Page 247 of 1126 C-10 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 17: Looking East and Up at Closed Corrosion Spall and Delamination in Soffit of Panel 21-22:B. Photo 18: Looking North and Up at Closed Corrosion Spall and Delamination in Soffit of Panel 21-22:B. Page 248 of 1126 C-11 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 19: Looking East at Fracture with Spall in Soffit of Panel 15-16:B. Photo 20: Looking East at Fracture with Spall in Soffit of Panel 15-16:B. Page 249 of 1126 C-12 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 21: Looking Southeast at Longitudinal Fracture in Panel 32-33:C. Photo 22: Looking Southeast and Up at Longitudinal Fracture in Panel 32-33:C. Page 250 of 1126 C-13 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 23: Looking Up at Internal Fracture, Delamination and Vertical Deflection in Panel 30-31:C. Photo 24: Looking South at Internal Fracture, Delamination and Vertical Deflection in Panel 30-31:C. Page 251 of 1126 C-14 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 25: Looking Up at Internal Fracture, Delamination and Vertical Deflection in Panel 30-31:C. Photo 26: Looking Up at Internal Fracture, Delamination and Vertical Deflection in Panel 30-31:C. Page 252 of 1126 C-15 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 27: Looking West and Up at Open Corrosion Spall in Soffit of Panel 35-36:B at West End. Photo 28: Looking West and Up at Open Corrosion Spall in Soffit of Panel 35-36:B at West End. Page 253 of 1126 C-16 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 29: Looking Southeast and Up at Closed Corrosion Spall in Soffit of Panel 10-11:B at West end. Photo 30: Looking West and Down at Delamination and Transverse Cracking in Top of Panel 1-2:C. Page 254 of 1126 C-17 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Photo 31: Looking West at Transverse Cracking and Delamination in Top of Panel 29-30:C. Photo 32: Looking West and Down at Transverse Cracking in Top of Panel 8-9:A at East end. Page 255 of 1126 D-1 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC APPENDIX D: FIELD NOTES Page 256 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier - 2024 Condition AssessmentPile Inspection Field NotesBentPileJacket?NotesPhotosRepairs?1 A OFG, full height1 C OFG, full height1 E OFG, full height2 A OFG, full height2 C OFG, full height2 E OFG, full height3 A OFG, full height3 C OFG, full height3 E OFG, full height4 A OFG, full height4 C OFG, full height4 E OFG, full height5 A OFG, full height5 C OFG, full height5 E OFG, full height6 A OFG, full height6 C OFG, full height6 E OFG, full height7 A OFG, full height7 C OFG, full height7 E OFG, full height8 A OFG, full height8 C OFG, full height8 E OFG, full height9 A FG, bot. at ML, top at PC 1/4" x 8' long split in jacket, VCR, L 10/17: 3069-3072Repair in 5 years9 C FG, 9' long, bot. 2' abv. ML, top at PC 3/8" x 7' long split in jacket, 1/16" VCR, O 10/17: 3073-30769 E10 A CCS, RO, top 4'10 C CCS, RO, top 3'D-2Page 257 of 1126 BentPileJacket?NotesPhotosRepairs?10 E 2023 FG, 14' long, bot. at ML, top at PC 10/17: 307711 A OFG, top 1' blw PC to FG top 2' abv ML, bot. at ML 10/17: 3087-308811 C CCS, L, I, top 8' 10/17: 3082-308611 E FG, bot. at ML, top at PC7/16" x 7.5' long split in jacket w/ (5) DCR visible in grout across gap, 8 steel straps10/17: 3078-3081Repair in 5-10 years12 A 2023 FG, 22' long, bot. at ML, top at PC 10/17: 3089-309012 C 2023 FG, 22' long, bot. at ML, top at PC 10/17: 309312 E FG, bot. at ML, top 1' blw PC 10/17: 309613 A2023 FG, 13' long, bot. 13' blw PC, top at PC;FG, 5' Long, bot 1' abv ML10/17: 3091-309513 CCCS, R, RO, bot. 4.5'CCS, RO, top 5'10/17: 3096-310013 E 2023 FG, 13' long, bot. at ML, top 7' blw PC14 A 2023 FG, 20' long, bot. 0.5' abv ML, top at PC 10/17: 3112-311414 C FG, 13' long, bot. 9' abv. ML, top at PCCCS, L, LI, bot. 8'L2 @ ML: M, 4' abv ML: M10/17: 3101-3111, 3117-311814 E 2023 FG, 22' long, bot. 0.5' abv ML, top at PC 10/17: 3101-310215 A(2) VCR, R, O, 1/16" x 5' starts 4' abv MLCCS, O, RO, R, top 6'L2 @ ML: M, 5' abv ML: M10/17: 3112-3114,3121-312710/30: 18-21, 29-31Repair in 5 years15 C 2023 FG, 22' long, bot. 1' abv. ML, top at PC L2 @ ML blw jacket: M10/17: 3113, 3128-3131, 314315 E 2023 FG, 11' long, bot. 2' abv. ML, top 10' blw PC CCS, O, top 5' 10/17: 3121, 3127, 314316 A Steel Jacket, 15' long, bot. at ML, top 7' blw PC 10/17: 3141-314316 CCCS, I, L, LO, 9' at MTLL2 @ ML: M, 4' abv ML: M10/17: 3140, 3145-315216 E FG, bot. at ML, top 4' blw PCJacket ripped top 4', RI, ICCS, LI, L, LO, O,top 4'10/17: 3134-3140, 314310/30: 74-78, 83-8517 AVCR, L, LO, O, 8' long at El. +10'CCS, I, O, top 5'10/30: 140-144, 159-16012/17: 4927-493017 C VCR, RO, 4' long at El. +8' 12/17: 4931-4932D-3Page 258 of 1126 BentPileJacket?NotesPhotosRepairs?17 E VCR, R, RO, 5' long at El. +6' 12/17: 4933-493418 A FG, 10' long, top at PC Jacket ripped top 5', 6 steel straps 10/31: 21-2318 C VCR, I, LI, 4' long at El. +5'18 E2023 FG, 8' long, top at PC over FG, 4' long top 8' blw PCVCR, RI, I, 5' long at El. +5' 10/31: 14919 A VCR, RI, LI, 5' long at El. +5'19 B 2023 FG, 9' long, top at PC VCR, R, 10' long at MSL 19 D VCR, I, L, LO, LI, 8' long at El. +5'19 E CCS, I, top 4' 10/31: 50-5120 A 2023 FG, 10' long, top 6' blw PC VCR, L, 3' long at MTL, below jacket 10/31: 9020 B VCR w/ bleeding, LO, L, 8' long at EL. +6'20 D OK20 E OK21 A OK21 B OK21 D VCR w/ bleeding, O, 8' long at EL. +6'21 E 2023 FG, 10' long, top at PC OK22 A OK22 B OK22 D CCS, O, top 4' 11/1: 82-8422 E OK23 A 2023 FG, 9' long, top at PC OK23 B OCS, O, top 4' 11/1: 129-132Repair in 5 years23 D OK23 E OK24 A 2023 FG, 6' long, top at PC OK24 B OK24 D OK24 E CCS, O, top 3' 11/4: 10-1225 A 2023 FG, 9' long, top at PC OK25 B OK25 D CCS, I, O, top 5' 11/4: 52-57, 63-6525 E FG, 8' long, top at PC Jacket ripped top 3.5', 5 steel straps 11/4: 47-51, 65-67D-4Page 259 of 1126 BentPileJacket?NotesPhotosRepairs?26 A OK26 B (2) VCR, O, 1' long + HCR, 1' below top, OK 11/4: 103-10626 D 2023 FG, 9' long, top at PC OK26 E 2023 FG, 9' long, top at PC VCR, 2' long at EL. +5'27 A VCR, LI, L, LO, 4' long at EL. +4'27 B VCR, LI, L, top 3' 11/4: 136-13927 D 2023 FG, 8' long, top at PC OK27 E VCR, R, RO, 2' long at El. +5'28 A OK28 B FG, 10' long, top at PC Jacket ripped top 6', 8 steel straps11/4: 161, 192-19411/5: 12-1428 D OGFG, bot. 10' abv ML, top at PC11/4: 16011/5: 16-1728 E FG, 10' long, top at PC Jacket ripped top 6', 8 steel straps 11/4: 160, 200-20129 A 2023 FG, 7' long, top at PC OK29 B 2023 FG, 7' long, top at PC OK29 D 2023 FG, 8' long, top at PC OK29 E VCR, O, R, RO, 2' long at El. +5'30 A OK30 B CCS, I, Top 3.5' 11/5: 96-9830 D 2023 FG, 7' long, top at PC L2 @ ML: F, OK30 E L2 @ ML: F, OK31 A 2023 FG, 10' long, top at El. + 8', center at MSL 11/5: 112-11331 B FG, 6' long, top at PC Jacket ripped, RO, I, L, top 3'11/5: 112-113, 160-162, 183-18531 D HCR + VCR at Top, OK 11/5: 18031 EOCS, O, RO + CCS L, LO, top 3'L2 @ ML: F, OK11/5: 177-17932 A 2023 FG, top 11' blw PC, bot 1' abv ML OK11/5: 170-171, 208-20912/18: 15-1832 B OGFG, top at PC, continues blw MSL Jacket ripped, R, I, top 2' 11/5: 170-171, 23132 D 2023 FG, 13' long, top at PC Minor CCS, O, RO, EL. +5', 3' below jacket 11/5: 170-171, 208-20932 E VCR, O, 3' long at EL. +5' 11/5: 170-171, 208-20933 A 2023 FG, top 10' blw PC, bot at ML 11/6: 17-18D-5Page 260 of 1126 BentPileJacket?NotesPhotosRepairs?33 B OFG, top at PC, continues blw MSL 11/6: 17-1833 D FG, 14' long, top at PC Jacket ripped, 13 steel straps 11/6: 17-18, 64-6533 E FG, 14' long, top at PC Jacket deteriorated, 13 steel straps 11/6: 17-18, 66-6734 YVCR, 3' long at EL. +5', LL2 @ ML: F, OK11/6: 77-7834 ZCCS, O, Top 3'L2 @ ML: F, OK11/6: 77-78, 139-142, 150-15312/18: 12-1434 A 2023 FG, top a EL. +15', bot. at ML VCR, O, Top 3'11/6: 77-78, 14612/18: 9-1134 CVCR, R, 3' long at EL. +3'L2 @ ML: F, OK11/6: 73-7634 E FG, 8' long, top at PC 6 steel straps11/6: 73-7611/7: 17234 F OCS, O, Top 3'11/6: 73-7611/7: 172-174, 183-184Repair in 5 years34 G L2 @ ML, F, OK 11/6: 73-7635 YOCS, O, R, top 5'L2 @ ML: F, OK11/6: 157-15811/7: 11-14, 101Repair in 5 years35 Z OK 11/6: 157-15835 A OCS O, R, Top 5'11/6: 157-15811/7: 17-20, 101Repair in 5 years35 C OK 11/6: 157-15835 E 2023 FG, 8' long, top at PC OK 11/7: 98-10035 F 2023 FG, 8' long, top at PC OK 11/7: 98-10035 G OFG, 6' long, top at PC'Jacket unwrapping top 2', deterioration at bottom11/7: 98-100, 127-12836 Y L2 @ ML: F, OK 11/7: 23-2536 Z 2023 FG, 5' long, top at PC OK 11/7: 23-2536 A 2023 FG, 12' long, top at PC OK 11/7: 23-2536 C 2023 FG, top a EL. +6', bot. at ML CCS, I, Top 4'11/7: 23-25, 97, 9812/18: 5-736 EVertical Sawcuts, Top 6', O, LO, Possible attempted / aborted repairs11/7: 23-25, 91-9312/18: 1-4, 8D-6Page 261 of 1126 BentPileJacket?NotesPhotosRepairs?36 F2023 FG, 7' long, top at PCFG, 5 ' long, bot. at MLOK 11/7: 23-2536 G FG, oversized, bot. at ML, top 6' abv. ML OK 11/7: 23-25Pile Inspection Abbreviations2023 FG =Pile Repaired in 2023 with Gray Round Fiberglass Jacket and Grout FillFG =Pile Previously Repaired with White Round Fiberglass Jacket and Grout FillOFG =Pile Previously Repaired with White Octagonal Tight Fiberglass JacketOGFG =Pile Previously Repaired with White Octagonal Fiberglass Jacket and Grout Fillbot. =bottomabv. =aboveML =MudlinePC =Bottom of Pile Capblw =BelowL =Left (looking inboard)R =Right (looking inboard)O =OutboardI =InboardLI =Left Inboard FaceLO =Right Inboard FaceRI =Right Outboard FaceLI =Left Outboard FaceVCR =Vertical CrackDCR =Diagonal CrackHCR =Horizontal CrackCCS =Closed Corrosion SpallOCS =Open Corrosion SpallL2 =Level II Close Pile Inspection with cleaning of marine growthF =Firm Concrete based on L2 Pick TestM =Medium Concrete based on L2 Pick TestS =Soft Concrete based on L2 Pick TestMSL =Mean Sea LevelEL =Elevation in MLLW datumD-7Page 262 of 1126 Bn+1 2/2624(o Fa |X AGE Wes— A E C / 1 LA ESN Engineering, PLLC +ngonal Ale Wrap- ol&! (T90) EA 3 fle 13 eA— NoP+ E ~ J HerwoSq Geach Pile CA0 Pier - 2024 D-8 Page 263 of 1126 3e+ Co12/2.24 Fa CO 1xi AGE WWes— A EC / EA ESN Engineering, PLLC HerwoS< Ceach Pile - 3 file BeAR Pier - 2021 NoPH E ~ J Sos J E A J D-9 Page 264 of 1126 e1s/2-2" F q cO L AGE Pic I EC if / 0 LA ESN Engineering, PLLCBen* 3 Soo CM v wall Fer CooAA Eas+ Fice EA Pile CA0 — 3 fle B3eA— EA/ @ics 2- 7"*"> y’ccs- R<PAi —- 27227 (A) oc+agonu( fbero/nss"" Wrap - ol •Wes— Fac€ D-10 Page 265 of 1126 /S/zezy eA+ H Fa cO l AGE 7 I 7"Avo. Heish* A E E EA + C • oc V ESN Engineering, PLLC Pile CAO — 3 f 1€ 5eA Pic S Oc+4gonal Fiberslss file W,4o> ol! Sos J EA Wes— F A c& - — - S ‘Av9. 0c* D-11 Page 266 of 1126 Ben+5Fa cO l AC.E C11" Jong •J ► Rp.q" A C . 60I ftX / L FA CC—A ESN Engineering, PLLC A e* ( FibeslaSS fle wrp- ol! Cryo.)w<] to l1 s/2ozy NoPl E C2 s’g" % W0 y ey 00 11 E21 Pile CAo — 3 fle 13 eAR Co5f*2 10 Cecs2S-21 CCS- deen i ‘ 2 / P7755 D-12 Page 267 of 1126 Ben+ 6 x AGE A EC / LA ESN Engineering, PLLC Soo 6‘-o" q" EA teli $1202 4 Ens Face - 18/17/221 Pile Cao — 3 fe B3eA3 NJ oP+ E ~ J -I" dee? C hle — - cCS-F el- 6o*hr ] /. (hies 36-40) -OcHjonol FiberolsS Ale W4s+ ce Urapr oL‘ CTgP.) Eas + Fa c& D-13 Page 268 of 1126 8e+7 F q cO s‘4 x AEC ALe Wes— * t A EC / LA qos/2e2y ESN Engineering, PLLC was" A <Pics 44-9s $ Avs. DeeP CCS- F, 0c+4gon.( Fibers WPP - olc ! Pile CAo — 3 fie 13 NJoH EA/Sos J E A J lons A-------------------- D-14 Page 269 of 1126 loS/2o2“8 8 1 K2222227 AGE Wes— to” EC No/ E LA CCS' f’x sy- ESN Engineering, PLLC Soo gh deep CCS P (is$1-s9) o"deer* ( 7" av9- hish \ ccs - Fix7 )Cncss9-D E ~0 Lo ‘ 0c+4jonal f flU. ou * (T2P.) 2226, (A) Pile Cao • 3 f 1€ leA A ,7—y dee" E as + Fa c& 1 D-15 Page 270 of 1126 Be- t Fa cO l1 AGE Wes— 11-13 it Ea u 7 / L ESN Engineering, PLLC lo16/2.2 -Wec+ 2o’’ NoP+ EAD V (ic IS) ccs-fx . 1.S"dece A* fce Sos + E A .0 fic I’) (cs- fix ) 7"dec® 2 H 3 flle 3eA— cYe) e.C6, — A.% + + HerwoSs Geach Pile Pier - 2024 lois/2ozy 77— —Y D-16 Page 271 of 1126 Be-+ ) 6 Fa cO <4" 4”1 E C Surface Seal , O321‘1+" A E 32‘ > 1g" n" 8O @"c) LA 1 12. CCS 7‘Av, n 16 2 Sars e YposeJ s" (ies 76-79) •• dacP ESN Engineering, PLLC 19 fur fAce P- -No F... Prc voUS Pale 6 7’’ y"berc.C5 Clas Qrt Fro. 0r. • 002 3 t ocs- $‘‘m7 >1 It 22‘ 18" 7.6‘‘A3 Soj— Wes+ F A C& 766.010 uae (3 . 3 file 3eA—Geach Pile C^p Piec- 2024 jo1o/2ozy 3 y • ?• 2 • « -°-9 J bar qex"$.., wIOrC K NoPJ EAD KAlk > D-17 Page 272 of 1126 Fa cO ll 1 ACE X 202M Wesk Face Wes- 10"7 V A E 10 4 LA $ - N X N He/woS< Ge«ch Pier - 2024 . ivluez1 s Cit 11) cos .Sdsef 5ur8 Qoe II" II 0 ESN Engineering, PLLC L"7" , uet 3°w be*f X" < AS13 Pile — 3 fie B3eA— (.5" dee CCS - Fix NoH EA/dos J EA HM ‘A------- D-18 Page 273 of 1126 Fa CO 1x AGE 5 A E A ESN Engineering, PLLC q.-9 HerwoS4 Geach Pier - 2024 1o2q/21 Wes+ 7 Sos J E A J wof P22vo o Pile CA0 — 3 fe eAR NJo+ EA/ D-19 Page 274 of 1126 Fa (‘ x GE IcS 0o~0) deeP 2Pics( o l' 33”A E — X (A Ao2"" LA ESN Engineering, PLLC A(cI V" 1 2. 11 PC.115 Soo z‘ (" as 3 ql-2 ‘ 7 * a" 20712222s pzx 9‘ Ces 121’3, . ecs 2"*S "deef HrwoS< Geach Piec- 2024 1/2 k 7.2222 7 4 7" E + 4 18"s 12Z7I (A Pile CA0 — 3 fie B3eA— 2"" 2" NJo EA/ Fic$.))YP (0c12?-129 q"xq"> I" deer Boll, C cS Wes— F A c& X3‘ D-20 Page 275 of 1126 T oK l AGE 7"0o i eK V r (o" 1o" dece EC C lo"LA $ e r N ESN Engineering, PLLC (A) CCS 0c1 V" A 4" €-6" I E ~0 CCS (cs 1-6) NJ oPH1 E 3 fe 3eA— (°3 6"4vs"127 RA/_ HewoSs Geach Pile CAO Piec- 2024 jo/2 4"SoJ —1 r^z Face benti A \ 3‘ 1 ■ 7 Wes+ F —1P Poo — D-21 Page 276 of 1126 Ben+iS IFa cO 14” oK 3‘ PileISA la A Ics 18-24CE Wes— eK CoS A NoP-l E % it 00 09 "EA I." J II It 11 @ 11 2o CCS <ics 21-29 ‘Int Ple IA©+ 51 ce$ e Top us21-3y ESN Engineering, PLLC - C6"deep 6"dee 11” 1" 11" 'it 22. Sos J EA *27 HerwoS< Ge«ch Pile CAp " 3 fle Pier - 2024 lop xs hh 1.o ‘deep A q" — D-22 Page 277 of 1126 Pile l6E 1p x1CC $ AGE CCS 2.S‘oV E CCS / LA CC $ “xon 29 1 HerwoSs Geach Pie- 202 io/ 3o/to2y file I’Eot (hs.83-95> ESN Engineering, PLLC G37e-73) ($hh* t"*eep - 207 ■, 2’2 272277777 Jo’’ ja’’ 12.’ “ is" v EA Face ZBen+/6] Pile • 3 fI& eA3 NoP+ E A J obovt Jocke* +y‘su+ nche* Ges 29-79 Wes— F A c€ So — D-23 Page 278 of 1126 Be-+- nFa cO x Pilc 17 E IA GE /CCS (cs IS2 -ISS Wes— V 1c 5 6‘ A E AN / v 13"LA HerwoSq Geach Pier - 2024 1030/2011 ESN Engineering, PLLC ex solh+ .00 1 (13 18-10) y‘*y"yy"l Ccs _ CPucsas-(4173 y‘*s"*s" co$2 77 Pile nA ou cos@To Acs )Sq-160 -—-— -------- NoP* E File n E 0v* cose Top Pics /6y-16s" Sos + EA (A) eL P,le 17 A 1- Pile - 3 file B3eA— Ccsr^ s‘ (ics 140-yy A 1" Chstl-3) b.s’x 1o" wele 90 Repair 1A ~ $ years ■ —5 D-24 Page 279 of 1126 Ben+/%Fa CO ( GE Wes— A EC / LA Ces 21-33) Ple (QA o HerwoSq Ce«ch Pier - 202" -/31/2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC 17 7"high x > S’deepccS JackekTo Top 5, t)shoe5 NJoP* E Pile CA0 — 3 fe 3eA— 2222 (A) Sos + EAO Cis 19,20 G"iide x V"hi,- * S6"49n2c"$2 D-25 Page 280 of 1126 eA+)4 4 ‘3 / CCS 6D Te( q" /// 4 E 8" /COS 1" 7 12"E)" (is 61,5/ ces s’x e- (A) ESN Engineering, PLLC 8 6 7 1"—9 — e 535 6o 7 HeroS Geach Per- 2oz4 1o/si/2-21 10 $‘ (cs$o,®) Pile Hg ir 8" 27 NHL W e S + F Pas+ Fq c-e ..-3 Chits cos 222222 (0) D-26 Page 281 of 1126 444 CaeJll 13’’ , 100 v AE6D O g’&sf 0 4 D 2."N41 I g‘1*/ 22221 It1 8 G CCS eI HernoS Geach Per- 2oz4 jo/3i2o2y 1 I I ESN Engineering, PLLC < 3 qe Soo / o’ (y‘ 6 (get 2. 0.5 \ v” \ 169 oyA o 6 u” J 1$2.4-1 s L2‘ 0es+ F •1 | Pas+ Fac-e IS"K20) 4s 1 00V lo D-27 Page 282 of 1126 Be-+ 2) 2." IS”3.S4A S’ceep A6D 10” 9"IP"13” 14”(‘ A M4-7”4 D X U / 7 5 eo HerreS Seach Pier- 202 4 o/31/2024 e\e < 3 e P1U A 33 0123.4911 r etV 200002 CCS s 0 J + ESN Engineering, PLLC1.* s’e 02 (3 _ 0 0 A q’l Os+ FAc-C / 300 hup L.” s” 3" 4*—+ 6221" C Co"dree Eas- Fac- s - II 9, fl74—22—* 27‘ 36"<e------- 7 ‘da) 5- 59" c" N>+ EA (Pics5,e) 12 u D-28 Page 283 of 1126 Ben+ 22 ] €5 .A OI 11 IC? 72-73 3‘ 7 A ? e K (ics 78-19 y3” 4 S‘(o No E. 72 ()1 7 E HerreSa Geach 2o24 1//2a2" ics 62-8/ u II 12. ESN Engineering, PLLC + D Soo — 8 9 ccse 2-6 (1 -—— (E 0” Pas+ Face 0 92%72s D-29 Page 284 of 1126 Bes+ 23] 13” A M I 5 0 ED 9" N E. 7“ 2’’ ()1 (E 1 CM 2 CCS © — p 11 — e ESN Engineering, PLLC 70 to’ (" 4 8 .J , $oc*96 qof J s s sU’s 6w”AA—A I'0 a003 q”/ $ A). R 2/3 < / n HernoS Pie- 2ol4 Eas+ Fac-e Q (30 D-30 Page 285 of 1126 V* 1% n qV 6 CCS 0 D 2691 —=o=y El HeneSa Geach Per- 2o24 1//2o2" .1 W _ % A (Pics 13/201 oV Soo z‘-8‘ 1o" 0 j ‘‘ t’’ 72 Pas- Fac- 13’’ 0es+ FAc-C A 5" / 6ef 22222227 7 © " 0 , gildoer 4.9"daer /-----92--------y hoser6) ) @— [o’deep —__ _ K.O i /Nolt E.L ESN Engineering, PLLC1 •W ouk (ileccsTo3 12. D-31 Page 286 of 1126 8on+ 2 SJ (7" 32" A IC Top 2 C-2 • I oK A D NH EA. t 7 Pile 2SE i HerreS Geach Pie-- ZoT^ 11/u/2024 e — o 6V peve*4"7 (pi lo’’ - ) pleiso’ asss- CCS To0 • wes+ P- l" P/z E &S + Fac-e ESN Engineering, PLLC z'-s" • $” —<e-51 out 25%’ costop).s 63-* (6P Kkuesse / 3~04.SSooth EAo -e( 022.5 D-32 Page 287 of 1126 Be- +26] C 22"O6% 7 6% AD 7/7 3‘3" 0 ED1"dep No E. (CS /o3-lo( / nile 206 ou* — — ' ‘Vcic+ HC HerneS Geach Oe- 2o24 1//+/2024/ ESN Engineering, PLLC — e Soo (Pics1o7-)9 30" / q"h6xG"deepcCS — 8 West F (A) Eas- Fac-e D-33 Page 288 of 1126 180+ 27] 4. 13"Po® Pic 13S A€ •VC 0 E0 19" 4‘ 1/ 1 E °K Ac) HervoS Ultiick Pe-- 2024 u/u/202y ESN Engineering, PLLC — p — e °K ?o 1y2) W e S + F A C - Sos Eas+ Foc-e — file 276 in vc« Top37 .(Pcs 126-1323 1L3 6105 113, IM D-34 Page 289 of 1126 z1" 7 3.S'3 / •J $‘ A"d?E Jack+S,l,+ top" u/s/2e2M Oes + 0. 66 Ci" ()l’ 4 D N-41 EA 2s 00"Qr cC>Q‘ 3 1 se* 6c5 O NJ ESN Engineering, PLLC s 2®® 202, Fa C (ics I68- lU 246) Jaclee 4 1+ 191-1" .—s" 6" — 8 1 00/ Top" 11-1 /o ‘dee L" q" . el 3 f Qo? ' c"*l (0 IC ccS 2.s‘x c" 222// Ben+28]Eas- Fac-e o" x ("doef as ---— • / S dee o XNLCf HerroSa Geac6 Pier- 2oz4 u/1/2021 257 u" Tile 28 6 0”— SplT-r" 1-My (ICS 1 /% ( • ll % KW (6019) 2 50u+4 EAo Q" . Cle. 1" -1--------- D) 1 , r 7'11s-m73) k 12" 3‘go 1 .s ) 4—* 12 ‘ . 111o “Qor 0\c5 D-35 Page 290 of 1126 s,°(U)L3 / 1,Sl oJ 0 OKI 9 2°0,1 ehlO 622g I zo2/S)" 202 -10 y2v2p vsowH d33P.8 533 Olid ‘bueubus NS3 9 -+ O 0 S ,.S 1 oS * $53% . i / v/ I 2 — Z03w 2 -r iib 5 (.7 so) 2-5’3 fS- (U W ao\0 a-5 •. — SM — 2 9 55 . 06 4CN h ,c . 5208 44 — 00 0s g ,8 LD-36Page 291 of 1126 8e-+.S0 oK A Pile 3o. 1 O 3 LAD tV— / T E HernoSa Seach Per- 2ol4 n/s/2o2y ESN Engineering, PLLC — p fa J. (4+oh 0 v - e — 8 Eas- Face Wesl F Soo +1 E A o0Nok E~ “7 D-37 Page 292 of 1126 Ben+-5/ 117"- oK60 A’detf CCS 9‘ A6D (PciS2) 1 2 2 01c5 89 3"I/’I" fof 1 o Nozlt. E 04 •(CS tr 5" 1 E 415 1584151 1° fiC5 17-21) ESN Engineering, PLLC bc5 a \ 348 fl6" . 15% — e HerroSa Geach - 2ol4 u/s/zezy oV Soo g.s’’ Q •h s. 1 - 1?0)—o 11‘ u" eol (S y 6-0 s p% P E A s + Face 2222224 0es+ FAC-C ( ----- (s00*. — 2bn0 sel’s 04% 3o" H 1‘- ---X 01o 3/Ou. D-38 Page 293 of 1126 Be+ 31hs/2ezH n/e/Le2" 3 Eo NJ1 E. / 1 E -4 A ESN Engineering, PLLC — p S 00 — e — 8 Eas+ Fac W S + F HerroS <U«ick file Cap — 7 file Pe-- ZoZH Pile 32 1 K.T 5pl,*1nT-po4 J-ck,+ Cockgeo) Che 23), D-39 Page 294 of 1126 file Cap - ‘l fr/e Ow A il” 0 ED No+ E. oS / O)1 7 E HeheSe Geach Per- 2024 n ~/202+ESN Engineering, PLLC Soo — 8 —1-------------- (D) Pics 66,07 II" ------—1---------------- ( Geiest3,5> Wes+ FA c- u Eas- Fe c-e I2‘ .—)gV (PIcs 68. D-40 Page 295 of 1126 Pi l e Car *7 Pile BeA+ —No—+A DAs+ Fq CO O)C ©O ✓ • (01c‘39 LQ (A) ESN Engineering, PLLC • PicS 31-/92, ISo-is3 , Cics 5 -9 0]@ 1/559?" N 0>41 EA 0 ccs Te Wes- Face 1 •* 0.071/ Be+341] m/ e/2024 D-41 Page 296 of 1126 •f Vtr [©2 • I©] ©G G)| Hermosa e nc6 Per 2.24 Prcs /$2-/83 u7 /lot 1 A „ >1I Prr 222 © r P9,-ns A . ,/ 1% 2.7/" ©14 V 0 $ o vh £ A c ESN Engineering, PLLC +4 Pile Ce- 7 file *--- Sou+6 [8+ 3 1 ) We s—F4 ce. C4x3lF:-6661785/85) n/e/2ozy Po ccs y"*/9"*z"dees ccsu"*y "*4 ‘ J Gics117-)9) D-42 Page 297 of 1126 File Car - 7 Pile BeA4 -No+A Pier 2024 E 4S+ F q CO 167 q"11 L©,A-2 7 CCS 7 file 354 ocs o. Pic S g-8 P(c3 0,63”$12‘ Ben+3s 11/ 6/2.24 ic5 /87,)90> N o~41 E A c p . o V rof (A c199 0.0z"* 2. ‘ T”e @] Pra 3SA ou+ 7 ESN Engineering, PLLC i Wes+ face 15" 14"x1%"J—ff 1* LO o” Ol / 25” Pile 3ST " 11 ocs q6 o6 U / -—Pile 35 Y R •.02"2-s‘ Ta ’ D-43 Page 298 of 1126 Hermosa (e h/v-zi n .2 Uu 130,149 ee /9.0^ 7 ' OIC G C ii" 13 % G)| n/?/2ez4 li I ESN Engineering. PLLC o. 01g” > y ‘ © --- J" P12AA89 ,42 30" (Acs131-133) •.02"* • .s^ 1."v 21‘ °0"r9‘ 25 ©] PIcS1309 1 "Jo] "de,* s.s’ccs 62222 Pile Ce- 7 Pile BeA+ _ Sou+6 [Be+ 35 file Jacke* OAwraPPlo 18p 2 7 /Pics. s IO),-S"Sov+h En & /0ics132,)33)-—— n s" D-44 Page 299 of 1126 File Pil «" 0 »0 17 C (192) ©@O] LQ ESN Engineering, PLLC 7 f BeA + — Nor+h [8e+30 () L2 N0+1 W@s— Fa c& ) 60 2.S 4 •.02"*is‘ 4—- — — — 11." 0 D-45 Page 300 of 1126 23. ©U 11“ ©}C ( 18 G)| S (G © Hermosa each Per 2.24 nle 36CI CoS%9 • (Pis 73,741 ESN Engineering. PLLC n Eas— 4 4 03 “Pop * file 366,0 CCS 7op9‘ (ics 91-93 C 1 * 0.01" - xy‘)ki >1 2 n" Djo •_______1o?01" Pile 7 Pile RA+ - Soo+A csU" (Picsoae .1 joN 186s0 2//477 ] 10] . S o J4h Ene €-P , 1‘x11 D-46 Page 301 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier - 2024 Condition Assessment Pile Cap Repair Recommendations East West North South 1 2 3 1.36 CCS 4 0.93 CCS 5 4.93 0.47 0.52 CCS 6 1.88 CCS 7 5.03 CCS 8 3.06 3.59 CCS 9 1.22 3.37 CCS 10 0.63 4.12 1.31 CCS + OCS w/ exposed reinforcing West: Surface Spall 11 1.53 2.05 CCS West: Surface Spall 12 13 4.92 5.86 0.63 0.97 CCS + OCS 14 0.66 10.67 CCS 15 9.81 1.11 0.44 CCS 16 1.75 4.28 CCS 17 1.14 1.36 0.88 CCS West: Soffit Spall Repair in 5 years 18 2.10 CCS 19 4.80 9.21 0.44 CCS 20 12.99 5.97 1.69 2.16 CCS South: Spall Repair in 5 years 21 2.14 9.75 1.02 CCS East & West: Surface Spalls 22 2.67 2.51 CCS East: DCR 0.03" x 2' 23 1.64 1.13 CCS 24 8.17 1.66 2.35 9.43 CCS 25 East: Repair Previous Patch in 5 years 26 0.75 CCS 27 1.02 CCS 28 4.61 2.01 0.32 CCS 29 1.25 1.03 1.00 CCS + OCS 30 31 4.09 10.00 1.25 1.90 CCS 32 Approx. Spall Repair Volume (CF) Repairs within 5 yearsBent Notes Repairs Beyond 5 years Observed Defect: D-47 Page 302 of 1126 East West North South Approx. Spall Repair Volume (CF) Repairs within 5 yearsBent Notes Repairs Beyond 5 years 33 2.00 CCS 34 11.00 3.14 CCS West: HCR 0.02" x 4', 0.07" x 16' 35 6.38 1.50 CCS East: HCR 0.02"x 11.5', 0.03" x 4', 0.04" x 7' West: HCR 0.016" x 4', 0.03" x 12', 0.04" x 9' 36 1.88 0.35 0.47 CCS East: HCR 0.016" x 4', 0.02" x 15' West: HCR estimated 40' Estimated Spall Repair Total Volume =218 CF Estimated Total Crack Injection Length =129 LF Pile Cap Repair Assumptions 1)Spall repair depth is assumed to be 5" unless measured as greater than 5". Abbreviations LF =Linear Feet SF =Square Feet CF =Cubic Feet bot. =bottom CCS =Closed Corrosion Spall OCS =Open Corrosion Spall VCR =Vertical Crack DCR =Diagonal Crack HCR =Horizontal Crack D-48 Page 303 of 1126 0 25‘—0" 8 7 PANEL A P(c 33 2 PANEL B o 1C C (SPANEL C 3 EPANEL D es2 w STORAGE ROOM BELOW LlJ 1— Li Q Q o O 2 z — D m S3 D t FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 5 s 5 ) • X 3v Pcs . 31,33// P ? o I P C C — 5 ESN Engineering, PLLC 2M23 F^ll Qepk Hole 9 3 3 ? s o (o‘± 11P 8 6 +eel Brace •/ CMj wall +o s •+ 12 It If $ J S + PF A /oo/2e2"1 1 HERMOSA BEACH PIER IN - 9 X 19* .% D-49 Page 304 of 1126 2 s' ±12’+9 •17 A [:]PANEL AAA‘± PANEL B/ ©c A 3 II.? PANEL C v F € 2‘ EE4C PANEL D STORAGE (ROOM BELOW G 0 h 1 ft r G s W 3 w t c» X V e FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 6 9 o ESN Engineering, PLLC s — ’ I farel c 1s 1“ lowr/k o I x in 32‘—O" 1o.s £ ** ll 3 Panel C is 7/8" /ourer ~ 0 @ MidSpa— . • A5 15. 3 ■ CPics 3-373 - _ _ —s 2= Jy A w + 2% % + . ? — co l o(i?/292*1 1 HERMOSA BEACH PIER IX , — wsl Grace T. 61ap) ----y 2 " 4—7 D-50 Page 305 of 1126 23 32’-0” a‘±Y 1,A :[: 43,PANEL AA t Ic 26'2 Pic 4o ‘s39,9) cc x PANEL Cg / EE PANEL D V C o tl 1 CONC. , STAIRS FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 H 3 NJ Ge ? PANEL B i I ccs-^iet^i 4tq “ ESN Engineering, PLLC s c $dPleqi ( X r **ka"9PCncC} STORAGE ROOM BELOW ace o f Oto wal( *‘ ) a g‘4 . 2‘±1 $ q‘4 1 (o\a/2-1" T HERMOSA BEACH PIER IN ‘z‘ 2‘ IT A A D-51 Page 306 of 1126 34 32’-0” O,< A PANEL AA W 6 WAV,vs CC 1o‘2 PANEL C EE PANEL D V CHAIN LINK FENCE BELOW 1s Pel Acplice, H 29)2-—t. CCS z"*z"A3.s‘ No <Pav FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 r s.s V I ESN Engineering, PLLC r PANEL B c. s C J •,) 33 9 s wn f o c--M Apay 3"Avp.uide , glon xs"Deef* (hes 1- C. zC.. -eee cac’es Mier Bleeduy tA 4re Cracks .A kes P4~0l Panel & • ( • ) Gllwid K Cocks w/ E FPlrescence, Jo BleeJins ? 1CAUWqlE>l-s8“ _ 13-0 e$ 12.-6 (2222 7744.NMR11 . lois/2-2" J. HERMOSA BEACH PIER oK 2.s‘ . s’ 3‘et’’7-----7---T-----T7 D-52 Page 307 of 1126 5 32‘—0" AA PANEL AAA PANEL B Rs c- C PANEL C6"C 6‘ P ©E PANEL D CHAIN LINK FENCE BELOW Po &pt/ - CA ks a2 t. 9 c%y w FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC CCS 1 s"hihy s“Av3 widH (22//X (Pics 18-113 y •‘ Cap Pour Jo* ( c3 20-213 1 lo l1 s/ 2.2y J. HERMOSA BEACH PIER IN D-53 Page 308 of 1126 56 32‘—0" PANEL AA / CC.PANEL B C X PANEL C CCS E PANEL D V “aael thulness Ansono A+ ( */ t os l -O •0.0l"—> tn Face (Pic1‘ ■CCS Panel Fnce © X * / I FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 © 3 ‘-7" ESN Engineering, PLLC „7 jo •) iIO P Cent- 6-9 fic 6) II • 9’’ (A) y* , z‘-2" wso-3 % ? ? ? s $0 1 a C1’%6 V.w 0.o3" .•A Face? (Picig) ( 3 ‘3 —t. ' y Caf . 350 . / soy* 1 12a) .9 • s’o’’ Mioe cel -P iepa Y..X ( 6-+. Face of 44244 &4lk----- s” daep , 3‘ 3 I 71 %, A 172o2y I HERMOSA BEACH PIER N D-54 Page 309 of 1126 67 A PANEL AAA 3‘ PANEL Bq‘ CC PANEL C4 s EE PANEL Dit7 o ? FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC 5 s‘- 7 v CCS - Fix in 1 ear Sou+h Face @Ter s"hish* 4 "deer > j’long Hl- , (7) 0.016"* $ Crack;*/ 13 leedins - -------'> £ r e- As 1163 ? 6“> 6” -He Crack wi bleed~s - E f f /orescence. 27/2227722 (Pres 47-49) 32,-0” (he 3s-36) . a’q")s' hit* •" deep.ccs -Acpai- i । Yerof • Deck ferel N*/* Fcee Sottom 4/77777) A * ( 3 “H, 33 2s "3/ ; / .ce 27 1 1.5/ 1.52. 2.57 . 6/2----—-----* > *-----*---- 1 /ol1 J. HERMOSA BEACH PIER IN CCS- Fix Sou+h Face 6.+4. _ D-55 Page 310 of 1126 8 7 32‘—0" PANEL AA% P-cl A J 3 PANEL B © PANEL C E PANEL D u" fanel & Is 'Iz.'1 Jower FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 2‘-" 7//77 ~ S "deep cc s Kepai-) ye Pics Sour, ESN Engineering, PLLC re T* nppeso } Ras ben eigrzal, sel on Cs -no iss ve ) ___________2e"-gdueces""YZ2Z, Pics sz- l ois/zoz" 1 HERMOSA BEACH PIER N D-56 Page 311 of 1126 9 8 32‘—O" PANEL AA PANEL B C C PANEL C E PANEL D FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC . fle) ML- Es. seaces Transverse Cks, Rll Pa-d wd*h,N, bleediny. A tois/2o2" J HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-57 Page 312 of 1126 11 • | la 14I® 10 9 PANEL A 4" 12 PANEL B C PANEL C E CCS t’-i.PANEL D V V “T‘ FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering. PLLC 6" (fi26 s13* 802/12" (P AAl \gso 32’-0” (Pics 21-253 NoAh Pasel face @ 5o+om cS— 6"long > 9" his * 2" deee e Jov+ •/ Cap P our s d p . ""—00 (” 2y07 N HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-58 Page 313 of 1126 10. A-9sA90l vis,Gu32‘—0" ©‘(• ssiblc A r 5 PANEL AAA c'1 S' G 4"c (hics 86-97)L mAa). E O PANEL D O V Pics > Jey-jo? J —F „.8‘ X 3’-" 77707 FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC .oz"> 2 ✓ Pics - 11-103 PANEL B CCt- Fur (Face 16” le " © os -(66-49 +2 / s” ve}. offse+ • CeS PANEL C ce-nes) (ics 62-s5) s" Poss.bte o *erl ono ccs 2. "otde - MSORPCC (Pic so { { 117 . Ceus exkd • tie Sov* Edqeof 1 = Paxet D — 2 A oliv)2ezH T HERMOSA BEACH PIER ** 2‘g‘ — <----------- “00/555044.0 ----------- . %‘ I >' S'-m"Ccs 4-------9—7-----------------• 63-76 D-59 Page 314 of 1126 12 1 1 32’-0” A PANEL AIA5 ,,5‘D 1 H‘T PANEL BIc 37 .gy 21° C ¥PANEL C 1.4 E E PANEL D* 142 7‘ ± Y —C r . -X X r Y t X °C 8 ce Ccs FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 n HL Full H+ vCr Noh Face (e 27) ESN Engineering, PLLC 32'0$3 „° 2/000/ Cs3) A-21 2 e1°C 36'' 12 ‘ 3 4 > e$ “3 .S ‘r P ¥ Ves Sot.fAoimce flcf 29-32, I I I , ( x1 ) e - ) K S Cs 0.o" full HF vcK No-* Face (Aic 2g 28 VeK full . __ __ Sooth Facecc3‘s.e2?/a1 202GPkea/8y-u3) ICS 33,31 — I $ , 14 •—* 1 s I 1e29/2o21 J HERMOSA BEACH PIER X X D-60 Page 315 of 1126 13.12 32‘—O" .077 —tLb sw.® y PANEL AAxr O PANEL B6 22"i "P Xe I C ccS Gics6V,6S)I.Sy 63XE Exs6 PANEL D 5/8 V e Bo+. o£ Face€ Bo- of Face mEO’O (d() 1" 1.S" if % c o 9 6 N i V 6 r w o 6 •3 FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 s‘© __.CCS CC S II dcss2-S13 Z r ESN Engineering. PLLC 2 $o 3 v ( 83 C “ s’s 43 ~VC& @ Gof. 4 - P ce •oj*fPics 69,7.: OcS PANEL C fres 59-ct X C) ,o/ S’wide cc^ C -C (a I I IW 20/0/// /9419202000/2 11 W 2 * z “I- A , CCS s‘ (sol‘nolS3) / 52„10x,* - (//45%, rAs3")0he v&k •‘ +“/// IX )I 8050 w f it Panel G * (Plhs* - $12 C.) (*ics7%,73 89,87) A— i [ As w * ( ===7-------------------- C3"*3"*)L"IoA5 ccs (Pics $7,68 fanel C vy"lfew* 1 J1- Parol O' J. HERMOSA BEACH PIER X Frachrt o.o3”yy‘ (s 98,11 D-61 Page 316 of 1126 Panel 33 - Tractor 14 13 %CAe. 06&0 A M 3‘ 9^1^ 4 c 5’0 I C r 6.0Cerr eSfen S L.C E o E PANEL Dr V2.c‘ 522% "AE « I r £l Jg“lowes i r T P X r © 9 heal • ffset > Pard G-wts © Fraclcc X r (C) 1 r Los+ CiAc. Nor Side o FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 Piece o 7 Cnc. 0 PANEL B •'CCS 6"*2="ln, cI3G ces 38" loas (ic । PANEL C S Fracluce (we CR — • I- Engineering. PLLC xy o,-s 33,% *a2 y">t h 11 x 4 1 10n3”) CCS e- Face Q hoJ. Panel C-Phe- pics s/e"low y aP AK . vs I e Cracks - e,lend * b.+. oAAe (B) s* 4-1)- . 6 J Pelam @ lure 7) Fie )7/////// "C&Bo+""of Face(ficis2 tcs HL VC full H* Necmh PceQ I 3— — cSMs-M9 s 6-PU ///7777777 Sv/,es)) ‘-01",00>* 9 I 6 r (z) o.ol "*i‘__(eics., PANEL A us _ HL VCK Go+. go6.6% "Ci .C Foll H+ face V -38-M) 111-532‘-0" _ Vcx c"hi,- © b.t. of „„ PAce (T5/.) H- e0l 9. et * O.ol 1 1/29/124 J HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-62 Page 317 of 1126 15. 32‘—O" C o i.S 8‘ O X PANEL AAA 4.s” i PANEL B C PANEL C n L G EE PANEL D V 7 /20w Fotj H+ Vci’ 3 r S o Full Heish* Fice vci’s x C HL S • in FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 s (14 yi"yoo 0.03 ESN Engineering, PLLC (2)VCK aboueccs -Ccs G-+ Face 95£6+ $"hish *? "deeps 22" /0n5 (Pics 12-) S Ccs, Minor Slee,12 (Pics 16,17)) > 9 • 3, CC 5 e G.+ Face 4"his- > 3" deep » lo" ■ (C 13 •' CCS “o’ 8" 7//// 3 s fd 716 o IL r $ 1 3 1 2 I 20 / l' 145 I 5 ».«l" H‘ 6A So.y Fice 1 4(3./2o21 T HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-63 Page 318 of 1126 (-/3 15 32‘—0" 0 * Hu HL 3‘2‘2'2 X XI PANEL AOAA /1/0/0///78"(o 1o”3sMU9" . 1555flece PANEL B *2 10A5 Vol 4,$* 7 40 q‘E E PANEL D92‘Q V VP CC2)VC. Fil "x“"s 4' Hu HU EEVLEVoe C) q" 8 s 3 I r 0 2o w 2 r r S • ‘o ste EAr. & PANEL C i 1?" "Cs 0006" FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 (1) PM) HU VCR ork Ence. 0.ol” * * w s ESN Engineering, PLLC (ic.39)_ Cose 8.+. office Poor (See Pres.lnse. y‘ Ccs , Ches1i,2 t’lonscrs 2 2 4 ccs 7 .$‘ (‘-9 V “S-42) . y3 •••I ‘ 6 2.42" w .V s)6 6 r3 / (C 0 (PIcM‘ AEs f 8 V. 2, 274.S-2S 6 5ccs*g” 3222 le •3 ©.•i *>6 , e..” o.o* 2..2.0 XXNNCHL 4386, IW TUUE r 9.02" 5 2‘ V 3‘ 2‘ts /<.« 4 J HERMOSA BEACH PIER IN Pane( G Frack 1 16) 622(2) Fell H+ vcR Mo-4 Face D-64 Page 319 of 1126 17 16. 32‘—0" I } " -0.53*” "" I I PAPP v.? / • X , 405420**$ A XZ PANEL B I PANEL C‘V %.S .$4, \ — y—% E PANEL D 9 a x i t F 6 9 _ ?" 2* PANEL A cos*e‘ cs 9o-4). FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 A) H" » e oe if 29) ,fvll Heshi VCH-I ESN Engineering, PLLC w rBP Laqve* (ics 80, 37) ccs o+ of Face 6"}."Avs. s c J a 35 34 289 oo’vCk Above C(S J n ’ i 3 ,5"*„0e-MAx- DZPEes (Pics 132,1335 0.oy "_____- __ : (ies 129139 N13 C ?94 254 J 3 V •.0%—“ 70es88,8% (92-97 CTZ/ ////7 Zs" s’s g‘ Pe - 0 J _ — P I i1 r 2 , I | 3) c+ ‘d 0 (sp , ‘/on, HCK 7o-K face _ ou n, s.*H F v _* HL ** r i o/3o)loZ“ s HERMOSA BEACH PIER I.S’ — o vc 6 224711sA—— CCSSfacec g0+. (*HYl"wke 0 Shallews Surface SA4L V 03 /19%* -1" 4 $ y‘ ccs 6‘ 22070 D-65 Page 320 of 1126 N 18 |o‘ * 32‘—O" 0 PANEL AAA7‘ cc $ 1 1o Hi PANEL B C Ct7feev P4+hof x •V (res P«rch or 22429474E E PANEL D face VCR 5 Pll Hash* •. oz" -JUeedins fetv • FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 PANEL C 1s‘*2‘xl"deer Suc Face Spq(l E S N Engineering, PLLC HERMOSA BEACH PIER fo/So/2o2y AAbo4~ — [wt 90, • fcev. *hov y/8040. <0 ”9/..9o a s’ J e 1 * /—k st ? J » 9 e Go ,2.9"* •" o. • " 0* • 1 .P s.oz")) 4" d (17—T —727ZZtyss _____________________Cn. (ficsu-19) CccS 6‘/en9y 67 fi ‘* 3 ) ,910-0 ( 9 s”Asx . r i T' Sol Faee. . - ,CCS 1* —13) H’C — bo+o-face$.£6+ ces*2.S" ceepGcs" Mi H+ VCKonSrome “hish % 8‘ ine yjl / Jod 0.o) Z o D-66 Page 321 of 1126 819 23’3 ° 4°9 S 7 —Gs-stsp 41.0 $32 SS112007%PANEL A(A).2 Aff 32 n$X,6 $23Pu 96 PANEL BBJX S33,S ,$ ,h*„S530rC19 PANEL CD 3,8Cos-sz said) E PANEL D 2 3232 G.t. . face PM DA +GH +44 (1) FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 *3V evd 2oq (Ln2dxa •i -• ESN Engineering. PLLC A— ,sa =n*ts-t**-532,9 Xow,° ob E) ,% .. n + s , e .3 3 M5y ..h 33WJ 30*+8 .s) -$23 7 s"ks" s x ,,010 „ts— 2202/02/220/1/2/7//////7/77 222 - s-1”,9 245 51 1 ■ 9 o 6777777777 C F /*?"* a "4 s—,5*9x533 4 CCS »CS * 2. s "Ion, e C-A l Elec 3 Fex uede ) © ft • DDZR=Glo, 242 ” 71 /‘ 5$30 _ she.. 6"Aishx 17‘loAjceS e 6.+.. * Face 7 (Fics 25-27) z* ** II ce (j uSy,z XSve/,’ „ Svojoc? 32 —0 16,4,$X,6 i (o/31/2o2"1 J. HERMOSA BEACH PIER M D-67 Page 322 of 1126 20.19 X8 $2) f r PANEL AAAZ * M0 “f0 naA ,h3,00 B PANEL B -°) x xD PANEL C - E E PANEL DSaeC. $92, h CCS 2‘* "wide * • " h ioh 6 of. Face IPd H2272E YMAMA 9 5 -6"* 1"deep Su7kee %P ? P X r f C r GuP 2319 /- ,0l¥,zoo 14 ,s FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 I w ESN Engineering, PLLC 4€ 00-99 S3l0 +s • 20J wes>0 7‘± 6icse7- 4./ 522, a 2/4) 1. ccst*2‘H **l >(" fxiSy-enrs "hr. 32000 C Cg f* l u *Y*, 255252P > „ 4°d •32 —0 %v, vo 533 I x V777 Sn. 2 S2 •s e“5 tm ,47 *t . 2222 Duoke-s v wy /ze o3Z2 7 •‘2 2 (‘Ho"CeS : h y,-01) £o0% ' "02* E2 fzz)zz—(ucs“$)7 Cccs .. &.+. .4 Ew* - — ' = Face 64 x 7"y7"vo. (Pi cs?1-73 200.2 „°28.142" • y” <l 1y s A. • "o to { (x rr ( r «78 $33 6 % A 1o/31/2-21 J, HERMOSA BEACH PIER M z ,5-01 * , - wGv.s 537 D-68 Page 323 of 1126 N .2021 32’-0”-E *e -*9 $33ft(2622 lI ,lz5i,S‘I X PANEL AxxAAX )) 2 B PANEL Bx X „fs*„t00 x°A*0 0248 ©PANEL CDx ( •• X ,5$4,2190.s r fit 9 H EE PANEL D (C W. cSlK' a1 26 e (21-22) s31, 23‘J $**9 ‘6n016y,9* „»/ 6 FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 r abyJ 3‘ 4*9 (237—11%1*46822 ~£00 X ESN Engineering, PLLC ) wie s e h8 23 ... ts , y o/si/aez" HERMOSA BEACH PIER ,7*1930 "t°8 • 27*3 VSCLi-hls20, n b 1 , 2*„*100 • — , 53,3°° 2 .310 x x r 30‘s ve, e*,9/c ,51 1 .5-1 eroq"*o ‘ 0_.lt" -(s) vca - fue ,Gua Fce 3'% •03" HCC sz"solos" 1 22722224—— y“hu*xB"*1-3" ccs Face e6+, FixiSyerS (icst1o-03) < too , 13, 29:o 3 | * 1H 119:0 14 1H $22 O 92 1.Z D-69 Page 324 of 1126 -ESN 15-$h 5310122)Engineering, PLLC21 te h $3 18 PANEL AA (1,9202,------------ »838/57 w PANEL BB K ,6, 8 ,$ <599 PANEL CD // s EE PANEL D i 12’2 ‘fons ol i' A Ac Her dies 64-60 3o9 • o500r,t *2H + ‘=70 2v o o 0 33 t 222522 (153) $ £ S ,8 2/0021.6 - 533Ciro9 arG FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 zr„Zo-0 00l8a7d *H ‘ "y6yEv,,9 x JP,8 "P»tX,8522 -------------,2 K.ho0 e a2vJ 33H 0r!n6A4.5 %„S-Li S.2 “r-90-6 .. eh J ,54,500 S"hss/o" wide dtswi-3) /7s £22424 32 —0 Jola33H 9 ,5*,9 - +,,80* 7 740 2P” C3) k 4 x r Svo„E-£ +09 2ad *e S >0F522- 122 ..... Cos’ Eza a3"Jt9 S00 G1-s153> ,.1 ** G69‘32 919 J 9 * £*93a 2P1m CAv,,9 aym021-e $52 22s Y" 32H „h0o 54214%_____ 32” y 4"hi4 xo"t1e ccs 1 (s1-20) — •A) •.63"*S‘ J 3o’’Hc* VCKTo.oo(Pics Ho-42) A u//2o2" . HERMOSA BEACH PIER N 522. 1512/022 36 xoM*jr2.) ,9 x,,9°0 $53 122 As o))• 854.2 “7,2*,%1j0-0 '04% D-70 Page 325 of 1126 2222 32‘—0" /» A 2 H PANEL AAA B PANEL B b,01$23 jo-0 D PANEL C aS g’avs $3D 4%) EE PANEL Di0. —444 o.o3"*lS‘119 vst l". FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 X° — 70 yard -n3s) ESN Engineering. PLLC @(cS %.S”hihX15- 6Av,9 s CCS 7’2 (ics 9--19) ©I -A° . L o- o2”3 ‘ zewsi" 0.0%"s l - ... _ x254. q’AvoWie , Pee V(IlaCS , 55,8**%oW*3‘.0%’ - ------------------ B279zz— — s’-p" ccs chialyo"ude 19/ *ace@Gor GiAo-93) 2eh ,$1 „tl22 530,92(? " (-800 S), _ ___(s&2/ (s-qas50 o-Wy,i tAMoy 1,9 o- »H 77 722 x »38 25*9 ,2 ,84,**e * 10-0 .. $,1*7h Y*d •pas) 1 1//zo2" 1 HERMOSA BEACH PIER IN / — is' 0.0)00 -----------------------------------■--------—oeo"XIX1 o+.Face • I - , H‘0.91 -x AR— 11) vC •, Fwet J (- 520,200 D-71 Page 326 of 1126 124 ,$ZT2? oOfe PANEL AAA,S BB PANEL B DD PANEL C6o fee-s. A ,$ EE PANEL D -C Acs Q’wnic WPIAA r wL eH+ , £ K. f-a GAV Gvo/,2b 503 FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 1" *,2‘ — ,8 »o y2vd ESN Engineering, PLLC (S9(-24 $310 » J*„s • ,S *h o39a+‘s y6My.A/K/1 7*3 % 2 60,5° -z15,5e0 art GAPs-2 H G, • t • PPWah 43*1° $33 — ------- ,5311 kst - ' w**„U ,1*,2*** o / ‘rP** „Z 30J %9n ve s„‘0°o -224 ,S 22al-tsist G13 cor,atS2? „i172222 f 9 X,2sro /////////%/ „h=,?t $33 F(2W-1153‘ 23 Chhl-Eh/s9W (zh-$£1 5310) , 73r 52,13 -) -Ci) VcR HU / P-H- i 0121 6‘ccs 2444 3.+. o£ Face . ef. ,st6-. “3V •1avS 70,,9100. -52,3"°— —---------y QS1-251 $2197 32’-0” -----*0 woH tk TO • V ‘V3A \ 73A nt030 — h n f k 43 r 20 J. HERMOSA BEACH PIER IN Y./1 0.S”*4‘ Carcs 0051932‘*S”x 1 1q% D-72 Page 327 of 1126 .24 32‘—0" 20H 1/6 PANEL AAA ,S‘I „b5 B PANEL BB -2 Ge sS‘6 D •7 • Cu $00 EE PANEL D 2.s / 0.ob H* „9 »‘* 21--o 0.02” x2/ «8 ,Pl s2-US20 T / 37 3 FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 e hfA oo ESN Engineering, PLLC „6? , L ,799 46iy , * 6.0) -th 2‘ 200002002 527Sirmm1 *PtoSas,4 12220000 $33 4654 ^?2 **9.9 "he) ' ( Z* o-ol H - ics 39-32) • 4 ‘s 3 2,4 ,9%, 2° PANEL C 97—h19p) ** fif 27° 72A 11910-0 ,2 r 7 f “O >474 200 LeoXvl o 2‘ W 09 ,,*2 197® /72777 ,A +,,zo0 4°a T z‘) _____ 0.2" 0.o2" (St $32 A n/1/2o21 T HERMOSA BEACH PIER N 125__ -8c 5ou .. 5 + 7 31+ 339s -SY„r%*9 D-73 Page 328 of 1126 126 25 32‘—0"(ha J*“&‘u4531A A ,84,91°**PANEL AAA 0 B PANEL B21 18/ tt S & D D PANEL C 90 E EM PANEL D V co3"A3‘ FweeTsp ,ol©a Me ‘+° 03 ,9 K.5100 "2A FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 r. o »*9**d APd 71 93* ESN Engineering. PLLC ( 33A fC r al99 ‘ Ge-$1 sal '+•{' a oog ,$1%209 >1® 731/ N voy38na , 2-,100 522,4 ,11200 289/30 , ,3 12///// »" 1022 79 5a3,oc _ ----*—, (Pics 7-7t0.0l %5 - ------------- iFooce HcKO &.y ‘t8 023 —PW 32) , 0 *„oo ,9„t0:0 (e‘4s30) Gva,9 $22 5707070022, 5*„3lo „fl „s 00000/ 7 5 Hi *L P HL ool Face vea’s Kel •+ -H .—Pes t°'* 0laq"yu/ •**»l/s *9V0 » W —___ _ " <s-s$53P 933,92 202" 3 *2* . (ele ,zx,co-o ooipo?," — ' * ...h z7_ _ | HERMOSA BEACH PIER (91-33) D-74 Page 329 of 1126 127).26 32‘—0" ,2l t PANEL AAA ) n9933 n ,$ B PANEL B (% „Soh%lo.. D D PANEL C 4Q 1E E PANEL D 0.0242l 0.08 T C X r t N 2/3H 3 ,s2 *,290 22 s32 S & & S3D,%=C wipmn9l— ,94,910* * FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC , &*„800 70A 190 1 , i> 210 , +x,5o- 20/22 3 st‘‘1 - 5 210 QTi- fell 522 ++u0 voy 4 Uss o.oig" ve A x,2..0) y 1 r r5— o.o16" Boc N- VC 4 • VC- __________ S+,Soo / *5h»6*t $».h-c wiprna (Piesii120-3 r 0.-139. HL 1 s HERMOSA BEACH PIER M° ,< to-o ( "____ ,s5,4o-9"1 o.1"*2.’ HC* N‘"e—l f •2"*s/o.ocoKCs H+ e,S $33,22 If D-75 Page 330 of 1126 tru S 6' G,128)27 , h A »»2o°0 PANEL AAA Z X $33 412 $30 i PANEL B0* nH T G >10G t D PANEL CD6 3 S // L / E PANEL D ,s4,501o o| i V072 (E 9 o o t" (, " 1 ) 1S/ 22/202 555,9h *+°Q • 3H 2~3 ,S *„ntor. • • .79 X oPiceah’e Sn S 23437 22222 9L 0 FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 J 9 y Srarjo 1.3 ESN Engineering, PLLC r © o /* 2 s- Pan IC -----"33 y 23-47 *s2 2 27--9 2 (Bu \—€ as w CCSns”xS"$9" 6 1$2 — y I JIr C ,3***o .91 — jo-, 9 * 4 2 r x 1H ▼ 3 5 3 I Ao.otoMsi" neser-p •.ol" •.pi" o.o" H- * , Cu HhReVer’s o.o"vc.-Enee full H+ A ef „hl*.s* x r ,9* 2©e14 -g p SSt-Shi 931,) sh $33 noAGntosh yAPew v M0M2%c*0 1 A u/a/ee24 I HERMOSA BEACH PIER N s‘*o ‘ Aa f —kd 32’-0” 14uosqun,oc (211-63153))) V2H ( 7" apin,s* ‘*t* 090004 99P,2/*„8/ ibl %"*.s‘ } —*!" / ) pence o.27" Hu 0.0)e 6.4 (ics176-1063 Gics 197-159 // h $0,23 D-76 Page 331 of 1126 129)28 32‘—0" Y PANEL AAA I2.PANEL BB r 710 i Mo $) LSoD PANEL CD - S $3 H $10-e I •EE PANEL D P (1V -t ri r O r I r 99 2 7 A H 200 |O- o 1 © t 9 O 3 G $ I FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 r2 s ESN Engineering, PLLC I 9 o 7h •) + ^0-0 52l CSz’zz X „£o*9 (h6‘shso0) 734 2u_ hkjhoro ea 7 •.043167 11000 „s ////1 >10 I r 107nte % 7 s*s 1,310-0 2 —_ —1 (z‘oz51P 7 f 25 . .?h**9») ■ t —7 7 77 -in 777722 1999 d* ,kix,0t0re V3H l%„10:o s Cd — 14 10*0 7H 2 %3 . ' -H 9H 1 u/s/2o24 ! HERMOSA BEACH PIER N 18X „C° 4 D-77 Page 332 of 1126 130 29. (ahas 9v „l0>/1 S 20A 2,A J PANEL AAA S 30 2a,,6 S B PANEL BB /o:o ///7///020/Sl... $23,0 th D 7020/000000 .If* 1 t EE PANEL D( Y CuiYs 0019)’ n o o 2 P M 3* S c 2 77H ,£*„300 »100 _L © FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 99se sot 334 2244 , s +,* 10’0 9 4 6 e ’__ _ 0.o2" /ei 52‘ ESN Engineering. PLLC , C2 v.o"Y(‘ HUA OtCS S 2 e A 9 & 1 5 (02 2, 71 o 7)4 2)tJ „20194,1 33A ) (PANEL C /) o.," HL -4$,22020077773 42-,L $3 * 20,20 2/20000/0.8 __________________32’-0” 73H 2014,7 *,,20 05 AWXXXXAAOLAWWX ‘ 7— ,18*0 04 T (30X ----- 1 } _____•. ol 6" 0.01," its 6o-12) 9 1—— 4—517 I I s 9 J s/ 1 n/s/2o21 ! HERMOSA BEACH PIER HI hl KUO.a"6-o" — 1)D-78 Page 333 of 1126 N 1 .30 32‘—0" /21, /9 -o , 6 ($$20)°0 PANEL AA , £/ $22 se C.,5°0 $32n B PANEL B(S‘3‘ 1113 ,? ©6 PANEL C oo 115 13EEY*P PANEL DHU o.o “ X r $ V 4 7H ,20-0 s 1/ 9 s •==- IN © (A) 6 ® t~Lseo FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC u/s/zez" HERMOSA BEACH PIER 3/g ’ /ou -C 4 HU 215, bll A X) . owvp „%/ ~42r+rp an r rMMYl a t l (sty-tilend 8“m 211 2/ R C J. 2S"/ow * Q mL ,73 118 ▼ 3 AL Jck Fon H + 1d3s "fan,,s*t 77 y */#,6 2(vd- sh? „o; 3lo s-2 — -<h S,S1oo ______ 2 "”■* g-ia9‘ $ C — __4 11/5913) ** ,? 1S J HL KL , - “7 J s o-ow1 (($9 79A (ZI»« 4 (,242 4z 9 S — — s -11 I „lo‘s ,83„z°% .z1 D-79 Page 334 of 1126 32 31 32‘—0" 1L A Pare ) AA ,,29 s0p //22)s’S 2 C ,tt r ‘ " B B Pazel (3 5 D D ,.1 1 S33 ©E s3?P.&A e I D TV 5 2 L’a (00 „bl o 2 9 2 J vA d e ,s*2* ,.30°C < o / • t B 4 ' 9 s !« FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 70A eolese _L ESN Engineering, PLLC A 4 3 fac@Top cos 2*3 ub € 5 - 6 8. 6 U $ acc (11,% o 6 P& „48 • 1112 $i 3 £3) „@8x ) ,,°S S93 (t ) t ju 3.. (71 s__3 ,,82 * o o") ar*‘8 voH,**,5* J (-l-30s2 49.91*,0 I- 295 +8+ «) *3H 919*9 Paael C J9 Qop~J®J ‘so,* <------------- -s, -5. 0.61"* H- —% /$-) 81 $710/, //0/7 _ .... 7/1200, i1 99,"*,*, g. * a I tr l ... $32, f/( ,.3L whh$22„72/07 6A2.2***2 $22 „69 . oA°, sy 79e ,1o-aH ‘‘ sC Cx ,Set-hz (2b-9%/5314/ "US $271a9—* 1/07222 )a.o ).) 0.08 HL i vs/zo?" J. HERMOSA BEACH PIER IX 6s — a:olb" D-80 Page 335 of 1126 N 33 71ds -ade — £ A A€ ,% $33 4 •* A A(e:0 rS°&X,9$37 *p3 Ppt PoPey-• * .. B BnH3.11 ,2 &L f • wh $39 $3,S e-c3W.Co D D6 501,8 s 33,S‘t E E ?V 0:)3"*3"x2"dp acs 52.72% 9„ Si„ v ? o w st S*,el X f 12910 Zete 4 HERMOSA BEACH PIER 01 ay 02 $32,81 2222 FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 9 e s 1 o.o© 5 o -ol” . s' ol* • . 531) ,% [ L as Cd0.ol9 IC full H* ESN 32) Engineering, PLLC o .o(6" 2//2 :/533hh 4 5 .‘2 ,} . 52? * / 5 x r i x 2 $32.69 (.#/9 0.o1” o.o)’ics 23. 2.5 SA*.5* $33,% ) X , P000y. o c/o J E-62 S?‘d , h-,sote +° wvJ 11 sa.5*f162 • __________32’-0” GE‘98s31 goog —------—\,the <he-zs3 »3M,?0-0 oaoo 7H H (143 33*3 ,to- 1510-4 s-2 5f_______ .31no ,3x. 1-7 6—0? -e 192U5u0 -7 * r /24,Fo9 /20H (h5l) ( ~3w4 Lalut $90,3 f 1 s.ot" c.sp es'oro S33,% D-81 Page 336 of 1126 4 9‘—O"23‘—0" A 1?»0y3”c3)S H A AH d ».B£<.S S (1-$ c ©sJoaloa710 29*3 $202 S-1 E Ex M 2 - or X F Z P 96 $ 9 ** FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 6 £2*2 Pvod e2s -£* ,,39 e 9 6 7 ) (e a ESN 33) Engineering, PLLC Lot-1"52‘. wsvts +50*81 ,, hi $33 11O% 0A qA1-* J4" P )1222/ 12/0/0 s 32,1 1 ne/zozy 1 HERMOSA BEACH PIER N 40-Le5310) ,4"-o -H „tot l l D-82 Page 337 of 1126 3435 Nor PANEL A-3 ,8 • GAb,L CJ3 PANEL A-2 r$33,8 2 8«4 Z PANEL A-1 PANEL A AA ho %846 PANEL B “H II ft hc 1—— (C $39 Z5U $ -0” 1K (201310 44722 ss s3 £<» FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC ,6** * O o » 6 'A 19) -991537 ,51 x 8334 s32 „8t P $10 96 s h «*d J 3, 2) ------0AH „"lore ,/ ~ y.:» N A1 256. St A „11 «2721, ,2 (2),ol s92hh 1K •• l w]o/2o21 I HERMOSA BEACH PIERN „ If D-83 Page 338 of 1126 N 35 4 25’-0” y‘ C c ?(•816"*4 • PANEL C 9 MVAc Psleh E EHlPANEL D 1/n/e/22M10.s%▼4e > C.*Z,,3r2 2 PANEL D-1 HiN F ).(12 PANEL D-2 F %ccs ss"CCS 44 < S.S J XPANEL D—3 “>225(cS 7 44 deeSov+K VMZTMe N b w y Su" Ct $ ..." 3‘ces 1/00 6"*is"*3.s‘cs K, (isM7-is) FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC 6.s"Avg y* (icsii -102) ces"*26" * S'hil . sf al 2.k7 PeaK- CC> * **3"hih i2pdo” HERMOSA BEACH PIER - 3 esis1-1s9 (2) 0,06" e*+‘4/ x (1c$179-/89, S' Isos”2”XZle" - CG .=) _, e.,,, 2,e5")qs C3""*3‘cs . 772 ““ Ccs B.th 7" * Jo” high + FiH Leah, 5TD +2‘ Lu $ 17159 33( s/00/20 1" 4 s'avorG'ccs s't P771 5—$ oKAS' " 6s‘ ••r V 4 “Pop 64110” 0.os‘ 9. al —------5 H U 0.03 4----y • Lo'1 -------------> D-84 Page 339 of 1126 .35,36 Nori {, 6 5 PANEL A-3ft(Y)G62 /~ SYJ ,9 ficri2,207 PANEL A-2 21 xo“90028 PANEL A-1 >€X,oe A ,400°9 PANEL A2 OA .12hl .Sb PANEL B CC/Of [Geetand 4 Z A •)ee * — $33 Ja?.? *„5th ccSC(Pic 9 A J ccS 077 (25-$h sh-hh S‘0 *o wadag -?100 -4 (Z) FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 s2.h* *h*9 ESN Engineering, PLLC ss" At oe-s$ ? 521) ir’sh . 521 500 aynf 1aso ~ i, 17 " ors,hh $20 / 3320-, ,9 /9 / eJ / NJ w Is ?S. r) 2//2206.21 „S <------> „Ss 120/ $33,2% „1010 ,2 n//2021 VOA 10-0 „990 H ,,b£/s? li -h) $3327 „853 322 (02-A3 5310 PT3 • /- s/kron y wewefVd’s Mo y30o ,4 } ,5* 1—»*h ‘s, 4* 120000 523435,* , ©Z2 25’-0” +90% 2*„5*s $33 _______1___1 I HERMOSA BEACH PIERIN _ A •w 0/ 4o T e D-85 Page 340 of 1126 35 25‘—0"i/2o24 C HL XS PANEL C IO E PANEL D2‘/ V 1 O PANEL D-1 44©PANEL D—2Fo S.S 4”>s‘CC $ (PANEL D-3ML GG 4 r J X v + % N M es c $ 3 5, FIELD NOTES: SOFFIT OCTOBER 2024 J ** s 9 o l /"> ‘ccs 1/7//20/ S.s"*3 ' , 222222 (Ficus) o 0. 3‘ceis ESN Engineering. PLLC 09 3 J 4£//7//X( U S.s‘ces 3 , N) A wo 6G"deerZl(8cs13) 15.7 "x3.£‘ a. o I • — 27 ( 9 Hl •.o1," Ht o .of"* 2’7" ,pAA*V, 75 Ces *u.s"av Yooo is"xss"c c 8 (s09-ilo ceS s"* t < ’ 2Ey J. HERMOSA BEACH PIER I )(36) D-86 Page 341 of 1126 0 25‘—0" L‘ I (3PANEL A % V PANEL B o •3 PANEL C w 7 T e PANEL D t j — L F ZD ( O C U Ld Q O o O X 4 - "Of V ‘ A $ — •) M w w* — ‘ € a $ B7 FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 g’ M es w $ <3 - ESN Engineering, PLLC vl R v 8“ Delar Cics 191) 31.6 c t c• 3 S—s 9. —-----L STORAGE ROOM BELOW }——> .52 w w * — ~ *—. A A s " i 9x $10’0 G ‘ * Od 1)33S t 3 P 1< 1. st 3 y 34 ? C w 1 oi7/2.2u 1 HERMOSA BEACH PIER N D-87 Page 342 of 1126 2 32‘—0" s’ss’ Dela e Ns te PANEL A PANEL B I M PANEL C PANEL D. © N STORAGE ROOM BELOW 9 o &C 2 X r f A 3 • e y e 3 w VI JI -J I J ESN Engineering, PLLC FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 *a w # 6 V $ V 20 \.& eSes A lel/2e2"1 T HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-88 Page 343 of 1126 3 2 2/□A PANEL Awa *4 °A PANEL B C Sorlce top1 v PANEL CKAe PANEL DV .) STORAGE ROOM BELOW I CONC. STAIRS * r eb 6 w > 1 V c ts 3 o ESN Engineering, PLLC FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 < Jrs— a P J % w G 8 3 V t s— s * O - y w > i x I > Oeaa •• < o 2-s V-T----- 3 * Jw s‘4‘ ANS . 9910v J M > X sh 7 x is es 32’-0”___________________ (w)Gench Les C1ye.) , s‘-2* i 1o/i/2ol" ! HERMOSA BEACH PIER IN D-89 Page 344 of 1126 4 3 32‘—0" 4. 2‘2.s‘r 4‘PANEL A CCS 2 ' 250 1 1/2 X.7 ws' I.s’PANEL B ©.l PANEL C Sur 1 l' PANEL D, A323 L CHAIN LINK FENCE BELOW Si a 3 a s t o 5\ s 3 3 1C r» o c C) 9 o •3 9 ts w 5 9 s N Panel (5 Replace, ta 2012 - Cracks likely olue + J, FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC §§ D 5 5 S s / k 17 2 Exeoso, CcfnJeJl g. -"decP C 9 • - o 5 )• 5. — 1 2.4 T 2’5 2‘ /---—-----o I.5‘ $‘ N HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-90 Page 345 of 1126 5 32‘—O") 0 G 1.S P ?( 2/ IC PANEL B cos(fss-6) PANEL C & O(ics I jV)t .8I.S‘ortiak Ke Jo+CS -C PANEL D CHAIN LINK FENCE BELOW G & P3 S o e ISS 2-3 Dela. Oclav FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 /. I messort lit" deep ESN Engineering, PLLC 3) I qthgakfsrkxuoo 1.5 PANEL A w r 3; vs‘ 2223" oAA A A leiv/2e2y J HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-91 Page 346 of 1126 6 5 32‘—0" 2 PANEL A PANEL B CCS PANEL C 3 PANEL D 1 FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering. PLLC 1 2— 8 c t 9 v v. I’-- I God SAfice ***i2 pahaA/ .sr{ 9 3). 2/35 L : - O • . 8 G 9 S t X 1 32 7 ( M s ? *J * 1/ , 7Y 2 K A 1olie/2-2y J HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-92 Page 347 of 1126 7 6 32‘—0" leeP12"2‘s‘.3S 0.0)3 •s’PANEL A s‘o PANEL B L.s* ecsCcs 2-93,46 /s‘PANEL C 03 0.01”>2 9 G 1 y ESN Engineering. PLLC YA" / I CCS • Jep Copre CA)S see ■ So£ FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 7 4 a/s"deeccS **-99 PANEL D Ci 37,36) Q * S 3 •.016" 0029 s‘ ot" V777777 7 h ‘ (edze ♦ ; --*h - Panuk (t cs so - s 2) cs SJie"deer uu-y5ICS 11 7 I ■ 22222287* 3 1 oe/2o2y J. HERMOSA BEACH PIER IX , K s :— CCS_______ Cu$33-$3 . 3‘ +—— 0el2q-yfiO 51 — . * / 11t l 6"z 1______1 2yu 1— Y s‘ ; gl 7*32 9 2‘HL 3 J 6‘,*S”wiLe _ 3.SX D-93 Page 348 of 1126 8 7 32‘—0" 3/9 p3 PANEL Aa X PANEL B PANEL C 2.’2.’ 3)-I PANEL D x V O o X x t. 6000 Surkue Peav 6 o s5 t ESN Engineering, PLLC FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 j ? 1 6 3 g cCS wl 3/6"dep oc$ - (Tie $6-6 2) C. I • 2’2’ ‘ 3 i 2174 2‘, 2’2 1.21$H - a a A l • 11 * 12o 2 1 T HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-94 Page 349 of 1126 y\9 8 32‘—O" 2.’i X0 PANEL A1 s w 2" 'w O /PANEL B 9M vs1 PANEL C PANEL Da X C Y I x 3 M X x T X 6 ¥ t. w. I t 4 P - S 9 V t S o G s ESN Engineering. PLLC ** I 9 © t FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 H W s IS" 2ly -—t 2‘ o © u 5* +8 5 o 6 c 1 s AC . Ca?<03 1(90 (? 3, 2 63r AT ) E y’s * 43 / •‘ y I 3. ye I 53 / 3 2708007 17 ** N HERMOSA BEACH PIER yzyl’ D-95 Page 350 of 1126 10,9 32‘—O" (*) denc” Lees 4C•) %O 1‘ 4 PANEL C$ P 2‘ 6ePo54 PANEL D JI £ x * s to • $ ) + V w th % e J o > Galefo FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC 5+ Delam 2*s‘ (PicsI2., 12.1) PANEL B L‘ 1.S* . - AFie Li — fol - — A~+ */ 2 -A Al To,, ‘/t. •. Panel Sie «ics 130,132) '/mall Lik(Pic/2, PANEL A23 * 9 259. Mier Oelam- Mo Repai Is’s 2‘ 11 8,1 1) .S’ I.S’ 1 beAch, Ge :5{ e 4 —----5 - * k $s OPC— Lhtfole, fles t HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-96 Page 351 of 1126 11 10. 32‘—0" S3© 4-PANEL AitV9’1”7 $ &3 PANEL B u •C > I.S Qecl .)PANEL C O Edge of O PANEL D8 - Ter Aein- Ol-ceo • Panels B- Jes Mome- ? Pos Moma- 2— Aele,oale X r I % j y o 3 — 3 y I I » I X * 4 Fxege * l") beoch Leq s Tye. Suqta L bmcleet MaSAn-*s take + Fee .4 c 4 ESN Engineering, PLLC o. 5 + v FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 Geech leys 5 2 o d Puels *-c, 6‘* Pes+of &+)o Y.S3,bW 0vers*es30 Damaq-e C 0*/$eve0 •- so£6— C .ASide • -T- Kes Mas po+ K ) ' , ,7 Change ~ Qec k Slope a+ &e-1 ) o ‘5uc‘ 17.S* Fixt Cemov Cus 130-11 T .( e• s X• / > , I / 1 . I C pz’yz’ Ebls , j k—— —9 ( w ( x* , • I dm qBeach ID___o N HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-97 Page 352 of 1126 12.1 1 32‘—O" 4 e i PANEL A□ ‘8 w PANEL BM 4 PANEL C O *4 N 00v PANEL D8X 00n2 A I f* - W M en 4A < N aV 4 * r 4 Jr o9 o s 4A o N 4 = 4 o 3 w o 4 &s Io 21 • ' I) o \ M‘4 9 e 962 FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 g $ } * ta ESN Engineering, PLLC V \ • wes “d s,V 3 n, 2) D - o. 0.6 $ 9 I t 6 0 9 I . 3 Ma * •M s A ?M o w i s / ' ~Ski ts* s ! d6. s —— Dej. - .ss‘ 1 10/21 f Zo2 1 J HERMOSA BEACH PIER IX D-98 Page 353 of 1126 13.12 32’-0” Ov00 PANEL A o □ 3 C % M PANEL B 0 : -- el•$ h PANEL C ‘± e.oj”*6 0 a 4 PANEL DHLYS •c o a ("4 w * z MI3 ?II M * r os 9 % o 4 w —5 V st O © 2 - X O.s » g: FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 I ESN Engineering, PLLC 9 G 0% NJ .) 3 *» - 08 je,lP.+C • o o.o3"*I /- — --------- 0 Pics)7,20) • •.o3"iy/5 If X v A /e/29/2o21 T HERMOSA BEACH PIER l------> 9 A• / O' D-99 Page 354 of 1126 14.13 32‘—0" a ‘± + Lencl VV 3OaV PANEL A%0o 93 I3V‘ PANEL B © ‘? 0) PANEL C00 2-L tl " 2‘?Me □D□□ 003 “A e — DA s 0 ?PANEL D □ FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 3 (w) legs.4 2’*.’ Gerct C190.) a o l T o e ESN Engineering, PLLC ( S G$ 3 1S ? ya. J &r 0* —a % I .3 M — es 9 Molhple Abandoned lase-+s e GencE Les s > CoFroSto- desisk+ • e4 • ' 3 i I— c w V y it A5 re l 20 02 33333 , $3 d5 £ u’i + Geach i As 5*35 - s * — — J F— < 0 V V \ 3& w x )2 19 (Tje.) °K — 1—X -2’2 .72*< 23 92’ 40 3ra • 4, r ‘+f tax 0 •* Soj 373 ‘Gun i 1o/o/2e2‘ J HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-100 Page 355 of 1126 Io/3o/1.24—Panel P, te/si/2o24 fsA,6, 15 “(14 32‘—0"•J g $.SN40 PANEL AX 9 O O ((J •3 X PANEL B AXXN.O 'J "J o PANEL Co97 X A =CL/R AW ‘A •-%PANEL D •)e3 •a/ 9 J I % M V o s <4 •( M y V. ee. - 9 — o o ESN Engineering, PLLC 8 *,2 3 SC 5 Sr 793 s.______ 3 o’ * N cvojs 391/ • — * w J —t X * W & E d " o 9 6 M 1 - 0 o st2 o—- dCn kA 9 9 7 PJ 3 7 . :) ::2 ;/ g : at V -“ w - y s il46 1 1- / S 521-2 J J!J „2-**,2 ve/e B9 ip v• — 6 J. HERMOSA BEACH PIER N FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK 4 OCTOBER 2024 « C 3 = r — s C‘3e D-101 Page 356 of 1126 1 6.15. 32‘—0" X ow00 w PANEL AV Ms O •J X J r* $ I0X W N M0,8/<,S4 72t*d Ad : alI0W(2)ef C o 12d e o o , / )3q M 5 ? 3 9o X PANEL C 9s P PANEL B ESN Engineering, PLLC r FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 3, 9 Ik? £ x 3* Y 8 PANEL D 5 F = PH 2 ‘ .g • . J —0 6 ' V 0 n 9 I s 3 5 2 ? 6 / "/S’l *tjad “___ s ) 1 u/5/2o24 T HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-102 Page 357 of 1126 s/2o2yII 17 16 32‘—O" 0 t co X * B J_ -0 x tr PANEL A WA W S <4 2-PANEL B0 1© W M.€3 (= 5 U o PANEL CM 599’ /3*7H XXL a 1301 PANEL D3M1 s 2t, 2 **/°C a I —s o J r M “a oo •A J X 3, t o A B ESN Engineering. PLLC 3 o FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 01 9 es_L . &M,A x .- 1 M 3 X 0 - 9 • s s 3 ? 1 M.—e .6 o y s - 6PCs J HERMOSA BEACH PIER O t . 0 D-103 Page 358 of 1126 18 17 32‘—O" T @ X 6333 .PANEL A9AOw V)v PANEL B 5 %9 r•3 M“!re $ PANEL Co •.) * •» 2 X)0 :J 20(21 - S PANEL DMV.3 O v z.s’* 23 1 —fakl —» J X c o 2 3 O 5 V 6 o 1 O 9 O 2 M5 ,0? < *,32yabo—7 - C c s G 3? _* os 7 © e. ESN Engineering. PLLC _ O FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 3 S ri 5 t d z' z hs ?*0 X t . 9 2 •"?I rs "s : 3] * . / G 3; E : V? esr Q o 3) ? ( o I HERMOSA BEACH PIER IX D-104 Page 359 of 1126 18.19 32‘—0" M (X PANEL AC: 03‘>i Z’Pkk 3 PANEL B O 9 e9 o PANEL CO e‘? @6 92*0,324,% 0Ja 0(PANEL Da 2t s 3 r3 o 5 o 0 6 es 6 s — 6 o y g 2 en 3 e" 2 t ESN Engineering, PLLC ? w J « 9 o FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 t %1- oso o 49 2 el - 0 6 9 o s -V ( 0 j y ) •‘o, 3‘2*,S7 — A u/o/2o2t I HERMOSA BEACH PIER IN X ( Cench a -I D-105 Page 360 of 1126 20 19 32’-0” 13 • Q PANEL AX C U N PANEL B M £>•3 00 C$ PANEL Ce X 2aa PANEL Ds3a0G 4 0 B2Ac kRs~el 4 T f o M o - J , 3 @ © J I M s o . • 3 X 3 o I 9 o a 1.s1 ESN Engineering, PLLC FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 © ws Ow - £ t -If— wr G X 5w o — a < & w Beech □ M o Ml . 3 • 2 J J. HERMOSA BEACH PIER N U: 42 D-106 Page 361 of 1126 21 20 32‘—0" Q I I <1 PANEL A0© A cwn PANEL B -<— PANEL C0 O IN N G 0 5 PANEL D V.$3r) a 3 A is 0 • 40 o J I o © »9 o 3s <4 0o < e 3 0 x h €-5 3 4 x < w 0 0 I ESN Engineering, PLLC FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 G V w5 . 6. 2 " ‘yr) . *9 o Zeack ■ N 3)NNN s f Tp £w g •lC— 5 ! /.I : $ 3 o 7 • N HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-107 Page 362 of 1126 22 JNJ e 3 PANEL A t PANEL BO' /Y7H •)1) (4 PANEL C < <\ C V PANEL D00 1 <4 $ s CCS ~] Po, 6 C s J X J I J I 5 6, r 9 o W < c X s 4 ‘s 2 ? Dels, FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 i 6 * — & 1 »0y2*0 =, N i 0 »092*d r, X $3 s W ESN 21) Engineering. PLLC 2 33 AXAP 1 . W 3 32’-0” , / : L N A . ( 1 n/u/2o2y J HERMOSA BEACH PIER ? > 7 * ; J D-108 Page 363 of 1126 23.22 32‘—0" •)a PANEL A320□ ~J 23 i5 o PANEL B60Xr R I.S7 IJiN%) X PANEL CO?X V a1 4 PANEL DX(3C S 9 6 o 4 o \w ESN Engineering. PLLC FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 MJ — 33 S “ < — w s ?3* f “ 3 3$2 9 J Usa “NNN oltn *4) - 7 7 93sy ak 21/1 Tn । i 7 7 Deke, 1.s‘ f 1% —-----—4 eb ( e A n/1/2021 T HERMOSA BEACH PIERIN ) ? D-109 Page 364 of 1126 2324 32‘—O" “?Wre)yw ? o PANEL A& o O >S ( 2 PANEL B O Q 1 N M PANEL C90 9 19°o e$ PANEL D?o 3 O "?A__I vMA C oo Mo j I N o V e ? o 4 a N o J I V < VI ? o s 7 2 os 5 o 0 o 2 o o P ? 9 FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC cl8 .9 5 - 8 XX) s so t • 6 p 6 y 33 w G 2 o s( 2.%o4 P3 3* . v o 0 6 o VY. ui“2 k 1 2 ds 0 BWe/2, = < •— w ‘ .)s-(-(n .. V.S , , $3 •nc © CJ__________ 7$*4 * Jv —I t x L ‘ N Do 6 A n/e/2o21 J HERMOSA BEACH PIER N D-110 Page 365 of 1126 .25 .24 32‘—0" • 12 o'PANEL AIO ‘? n •P 4 PANEL B AARROk PANEL CDo 3 weT•) NJrebr) V - PANEL DoGt 1r S(11 *r(d I v• \• 1e <4 M 5 w I © 0 6 2 s o 2s 6 2 9 5 o 8 @ 3 "Ya FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC ,h*,Sl ww(g -9 - 3 M 6 st U ,419 Z SO V— s 9 * .7 ( 0 8s j. !3 ” * 1. w — • -S EY- A2 ( De lam 2 >2‘ C ssN _ / Z I 3.5 ‘*•‘ n L 0 ” 5» o 7 3 w ( to k M : 3• o• s A 12/17/2021 I HERMOSA BEACH PIER IX cesses' £” • 4910- o ~0 | D-111 Page 366 of 1126 .25.26 32-0” 9 Beach W 3-40o 4 D PANEL A5 0 w PANEL B4O <A Mr re) $ PANEL CO •3 1-9 PANEL DOo 8 ft e) I J I O o £ S X 0 o 0 o o I o 2 $ c 9 o 2 I o o 8 ESN Engineering. PLLC FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 N 0 o M • X• w w y W c A J M 1. \ ol A,to‘0 CS. V ‘ L 33 e) i s x no 9 s 0 y3 J 9 o V J M1 N7 % Mgs «• 2 w 0S3. U sb i 0 oe el 9 A 12/17/2.24 I HERMOSA BEACH PIER IN D-112 Page 367 of 1126 .26.27 32‘—0" s 5v s PANEL AV% NySa*4 PANEL BI o NOO rJ 51)•e “A V0 PANEL CAO J PANEL D0 1,o too 9 J ase 0 s r o 2 m«o 9 9 o ? 6 3 9 J 7 2 0 1 o w B % 3 6 o 6 8 9 3 o ,44 lo.,• sa ESN Engineering. PLLC of” FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 X n 2273 198( 2sV • w Ui 3 o 2s ‘3 o o o N S sUk w J,* y s 3 8 •133w) .*u% /n,etr,s 99’ +3 s 5 V)v w6 v V sM 27 o. • 3( * k % - o l ,, 0’0 3 I 3 (S g n— o I “KM1 CCS II AX 4 • (3> 5r ecs 2 A 12/17/2 24 I HERMOSA BEACH PIER IM 0 s D o ,% D-113 Page 368 of 1126 Iloly11 .28.27 32‘—0" e) J ‘S PANEL ALav PDA* PANEL B5O 4 J&o PANEL C60 w ebS 0 PANEL D3•Sto-4A , 24,5 533 J I o J X 0 4 X < J s < 8 o FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 ! ESN Engineering, PLLC ? I o 5 «< s 2‘*2‘del.. % & 0 I CP o I y £— 8.“ -- *“ 25 54 3 3 , K”7 (2 • X3t . - 6 3 552 s 1 3. cS Small ope- Spalls V 2 N 0 z‘*s‘cc$ w/ s-aloper 4 K ( 0 3 “Tel • (“o \ o,Yo-c. I : 3_ • • w . HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-114 Page 369 of 1126 .29,.28, 32‘—O" PANEL Aoo)” *4 PANEL B e-8 24 2)2 9 PANEL C% Ml o PANEL D9 r3 - ,S°C3,S MPo 49 O o O o X %. $ 9 9 03” - s $ “ w a ? V C ,2* ,o* J I FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 ESN Engineering, PLLC 0ics(1oS-t07 co s’yt’ 1 ) s o.p2">2‘ j) a i os 1 3" 7 3 s o < H* ----H. _____Mu___ Jl J ? V - - RONNN RRSk NWJ) /s) 3 31" .— t O 1 s S 4 o 317 3 T x. $ 22 2 3 v *- 5 • V • es (3s 13. 9 > { cr C $ e — v 9 A 1/S/262“ I HERMOSA BEACH PIER IN D-115 Page 370 of 1126 .30 .29. 32’-0” e8 f, l°‘O PANEL A SRNNsdoooooouo t ,?! - 3/PANEL B69 o Ui M V 93 PANEL CII /S1- 2 5 PANEL D yys -/o ns /o ) V VA - I 3 X C M * co kA • 2 o o 2 1e $ o 9o 6 FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 9 4 I st X c ?81 2 1 6 ESN Engineering. PLLC 5 T (0 0 1 4 1 * « — —38g 28 2 " "" *7r I is t &&} ax "4 X - 4 940 o . 9 x 59 6 .AOOA00.NNAWAOORSSASNN] \ l n/e/o24 s HERMOSA BEACH PIER 3 Et 3 D-116 Page 371 of 1126 31 .30 32’-0” CC $ lo”>2o” PANEL A I BASS PANEL BX M) 9 f 3P o PANEL C Rw O PANEL DO 9 *7 XGAM7 2T s V (3 So 2 e l w5 3 9 5 A 773 ? $$ 3 9‘ (e ‘s ESN Engineering, PLLC 00° h FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 2 o WWM / 2 € v • > as £*.— • * ** XAAS9 \ UNl , 2 28 33 N 1 W 83! De law w/ •-Spalls 2) 2 D 122 il s HERMOSA BEACH PIER D-117 Page 372 of 1126 32 31 32‘—O" M @) o PANEL A r3 vM PANEL B9 r %MD I X o PANEL CO N PANEL Do03 □ 3? C w e o o 9 4 / 974,1 e— ya*00 ESN Engineering, PLLC < * 0 * s 8 ’ “ t) es O FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 9 & < 2 id — -£3 iis M { 232 3 " £ < s V 9• ex r3 o t 9 3:1 W x, s0 : ' 32» “ U ° c - —U-6 • 99 9 J 5 o ( 43 JA11303 . -8M • ( aQ s 0 • .o’ ‘ ♦——- I HERMOSA BEACH PIER IX D-118 Page 373 of 1126 33 32‘—0" M M 9 PANEL A O 0c V 6 RR PANEL Be Py280 ero •aMI o PANEL C%9 r) el PANEL D 2 4 P /£l P o 13 O ,‘*,3 PMPJ 7 e0 tt 0 2 4 0 %5 o FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 __ s ces s‘*s.s ' •/Small op- 1 spa iff 20 2 < - S 4 £— •) H o ESN 32) Engineering, PLLC • $ 1 as18) M 3 o 3 • — = t - . LCS ^'xs'^1 cvetn *pals 3 NNTWNRRNs WB o kA o y St i — ‘ 5 3 , 10-0 I U • hts ad l n|e/2o2 T HERMOSA BEACH PIER IN D-119 Page 374 of 1126 33.34 23‘—0"9‘—O" 3 PANEL AoO O > PANEL Bi tPeC. PANEL Ca0 O -- —D •$rS PANEL DT M MM M o - X I A M o s M 6 J X 4 T J I o i% 8 6 o o 9 o % 8 V/apa P0P- ccss‘>% ' 3 © FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 J r 4 X ESN Engineering, PLLC 2 - • o.onc”) .» to 11 3‘ 3 A a GO V t 1 J. HERMOSA BEACH PIERIX ‘ (, . ‘om -- ■ —8 e — 7%% 3 D-120 Page 375 of 1126 35 .34 25‘—0" No,h V*t03 9 <PANEL A-3 %0 2(09 %9 7o. 6G PANEL A-2 0 £3 — £ €. oPANEL A-1 MV R PANEL A 09 0 L 18 r PANEL B •o r rwaal 2.s‘xs‘ De law. 9 6 0 0 9 ft I r a 3 m nc o. 6©8 c i c Q * G V U — ft ft 63 o 9 s v P. FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 w 1 ° ESN Engineering, PLLC o.0 N t • <A 2 , D 3V 9s 0— • - ) 2 • ( 8‘4445 A4s : s"*s"deln2 3 i 3, ,, w Ut to * • o 9 5/ T 1 8 J. HERMOSA BEACH PIER e _ / 3 2 ( E o D-121 Page 376 of 1126 .34.35, 25‘—0" w XPANEL C x« te 68 sPANEL D o 9 r 1) - 06PANEL D-1 t G3 3 €9 t 0 e0« PANEL D-2 *eC,€ V)—€ t y . I X0PANEL D—3 %a NW CSeo-{t 2 3o © 6 (3 v 3 s x r J x I r I o 9 o 2 s 3 o F 0 -X 00 r C N * a 0 9 6 e i. O 6 2 e 0 e 9 2 ESN Engineering, PLLC FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 3 x 1) 9 O ' M 3 9 *3 9 g D n v 3 2 2 o( C 5 a - 0 G.. w C ) o 16 > Cf .0. ‘ t at X X C < o P X 1 1)e/2021 I HERMOSA BEACH PIER IN D-122 Page 377 of 1126 3536 25’-0” No-. »4 N ©PANEL A-329 I MOe N o PANEL A-2Z —3 j t r9 25 Q PANEL A r3 0 PANEL B sko ( SS 9 6 > 4 5 V es M es J T V S a o o J 9 M X oc 0 9 o 9o 0 o J I O V A o © r gsl 5 o o o os FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 0 o ESN Engineering. PLLC i o3 & o e ' c n PA G f'Y “ s - $ 2 X 33 s ) 03 3 §59 0 0 0 I P - 9 es 0 43 9C •.8 oJ 0 3 : 0 22884 .—J U PANEL A-1" I L —8 ? •I o 0 .. 1/ 3 9 - J ,9100 2 * V P"2 : M Y- A- 240.• Hi 9 J ( J I "/2o2y w - M ?u ’ ? - 5 gs • va • 9s9 ) • 6“yy‘ces I HERMOSA BEACH PIERIN _ D-123 Page 378 of 1126 35361/e/2o2‘ 25‘—0" % ‘*8"ces eve, ere v. path 6 PANEL C 1 N 0o PANEL D09aw 6r)gsW8 ® 2 7 PANEL D-10 s5 I i 0s PANEL D—2© 0 •4e) 4 PANEL D-3iaD +1 % fel k 59 V * J T e 4 @ 1 9 o M O C s5 to 2 9 • o % $ x - o o s v 69 r 0 4o o 8 ft 1 L ESN Engineering. PLLC FIELD NOTES: TOP DECK OCTOBER 2024 0 0 ft D 0. U ■ 2 o 9 3{ MXXNWXXXWWWks' 5 . 9 — • : ft s s 3 v - 0•22 u &% CH ’ U * . < 333 =93 y wov ’ 2 s 0 4 • J V □ O y - s : ft 0.ol" . t 1) A r) M • e- cc$ ~s X s J, HERMOSA BEACH PIERN _ D-124 Page 379 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier - 2024 Condition AssessmentPanel Repair Recommendations (within 5 years)Top Soffit Deck Shear Key CCS OCS0-1 A 0.830-1 B 1.460-1 C 0.830-1 D 10 1.001-2 A 2.081-2 B 0.831-2 C 5 4.69Top: 1/4" deep OCSBot: Panel C is 3/8" lower than B & 1/4" lower than D1-2 D2-3 A 5 2.632-3 B 2.33 Top: 3/8" deep OCS2-3 C 2.29 Top: Surface pops2-3 D 10 2.923-4 A 1.153-4 B 15 25 0.92Panel replaced in 2012. Top: shallow top cover, exposed rebar3-4 C 153-4 D 1.004-5 A 5 0.834-5 B 5 0.42 0.19 0.974-5 C 2.33 Top: 3/8" OCS4-5 D 5 1.675-6 A 7 0.435-6 B 0.13 1.065-6 C 1.33 0.925-6 D 36-7 A 13 3.75 0.57 Top: 1/2" OCSBents PanelFRP Laminate (SF)Replace PanelNotesCrack Injection (LF)Top Deck Soffit / EdgeSpall Repairs (CF)D-125Page 380 of 1126 Top Soffit Deck Shear Key CCS OCSBents PanelFRP Laminate (SF)Replace PanelNotesCrack Injection (LF)Top Deck Soffit / EdgeSpall Repairs (CF)6-7 B 5 1.676-7 C 5 2.50 Top: 5/16" OCS6-7 D 6 3.97 2.94 Top: 5/16" OCS7-8 A 207-8 B 10 0.577-8 C 1.04 Top: 3/8" OCS7-8 D 5 0.888-9 A 15 0.388-9 B 10 0.388-9 C 108-9 D 59-10 A 9 1.079-10 B 0.83 0.449-10 C 0.83 0.549-10 D 9 0.8310-11 A 10 4.7560Soffit: Overstress damage,Panel A is 3/32" lower on south side of longitudinal crack10-11 B 10 3.5760Soffit: Overstress damage10-11 C 6.2280Soffit: Overstress damage, Panel C has 1/8" vertical offset at longitudinal crack10-11 D 13Soffit: Consider Shear Key Repair at East End at Panel C11-12 A 12 8 3.96 1.3811-12 B 30 8 3.75 0.5011-12 C 15 4 3.75 0.2211-12 D 37 2.0312-13 A 14 11 5.18 Soffit: Fracture 8' from Bent 1212-13 B 10 2 8.01110Soffit: Fracture 10' from Bent 12.Panel B is 1-1/16" lower than Panel A 7' from Bent 12.D-126Page 381 of 1126 Top Soffit Deck Shear Key CCS OCSBents PanelFRP Laminate (SF)Replace PanelNotesCrack Injection (LF)Top Deck Soffit / EdgeSpall Repairs (CF)12-13 C 12 0.38 12.94110Soffit: Fracture 11' from Bent 12.Panel C is 1/4" lower than Panel D 12' from Bent 12.12-13 D 15 8 0.83 1.1513-14 A 10 3.96 2.1213-14 B 17 3.75 0.33110Soffit: Fracture 5' from Bent 13, North side of panel is 1/8" lower13-14 C 5 0.20 0.70110Top: Key joint cracks each sideSoffit: Fracture 8' from Bent 13, Missing piece of concrete (no corrosion), Panel C is 5/8" lower than D13-14 D 28 2.1314-15 A 20 13 3.06 0.9414-15 B 22 1.67 1.6814-15 C 35 2.2914-15 D 23 5 0.9415-16 A 19 2 3.3415-16 B 2 10 1.67 4.93110Soffit: Fracture with 9"x2'x5" deep void, 50% rebar section loss15-16 C 15 10 0.50 5.2515-16 D 7 5.7216-17 A 5 22 4.2116-17 B 10 11 0.17 0.9716-17 C 5 8 1.5090Soffit: Panel C is 1/2" lower than D 8.5' from Bent 1716-17 D 5 20 0.83 6.0517-18 A 12 7 1.00 16.9417-18 B 25 18 0.6317-18 C 25 8 0.42 4.6717-18 D 20 2 8.9770D-127Page 382 of 1126 Top Soffit Deck Shear Key CCS OCSBents PanelFRP Laminate (SF)Replace PanelNotesCrack Injection (LF)Top Deck Soffit / EdgeSpall Repairs (CF)18-19 A 10 9 12.04Soffit: Significant cross section spalled including along shear key18-19 B 20 14 2.3818-19 C 13 0.52 14.7418-19 D 5 15.00100Soffit: Significant region of delaminated concrete19-20 A 9 13 0.38 7.38 0.7519-20 B 8 2.17 Top: Includes small OCS19-20 C 15 3.19 9.14 Top: Includes small OCS19-20 D 15 4 23.3520-21 A 6 6.25 4.93 Top: Includes small OCS20-21 B 30 5 0.1720-21 C 15 17 3.3320-21 D 15 31 2.3321-22 A 22 5.63 5.73 Top: Includes small OCS21-22 B 12 8.33 1.22110Soffit: Significant region of delaminated concrete21-22 C 15 2.29 7.5821-22 D 14 1.04 11.0822-23 A 26 5.1022-23 B 5 2 1.13 2.0822-23 C 10 0.63 4.1322-23 D 38 3.54 6.8223-24 A 11 16 2.83 11.9023-24 B 5 17 3.00 5.5923-24 C 23 15 1.0423-24 D 20 0.63 6.2524-25 A 10 14 3.57 0.13 Top: Includes small OCS24-25 B 24 0.13 1.92 9.0624-25 C 10 19 4.29 1.34 Top: Includes small OCS24-25 D 15 19 1.74 4.3325-26 A 5 65 3.02 2.0170D-128Page 383 of 1126 Top Soffit Deck Shear Key CCS OCSBents PanelFRP Laminate (SF)Replace PanelNotesCrack Injection (LF)Top Deck Soffit / EdgeSpall Repairs (CF)25-26 B 20 5 1.04 4.6125-26 C 27 27 1.04 1.2925-26 D 10 25 2.75 6.1726-27 A 12 18 6.88 3.31 Top: Includes small OCS26-27 B 15 7 2.52 0.2526-27 C 10 18 4.17 1.01 Top: Includes small OCS26-27 D 34 4027-28 A 37 2.42 3.09Top: Includes small OCSSoffit: Overstress damage - 3/8"x1/2" groove w/ vertical offset 13' from Bent 2827-28 B 22 1.67 0.6527-28 C 10 1.35 16.67110Top: Includes small OCSSoffit: West 10' delaminated, Panel C 1" lower than B 6' from Bent 2827-28 D 7 16 1.25 2.1428-29 A 6 44 4.38 0.56 0.18 0.5628-29 B 10 2.0828-29 C 20 13.00 2.0028-29 D 10 4.78 0.8329-30 A 20 8.33 Top: Includes small OCS29-30 B 19 0.13 1.44 3.0929-30 C 19 5.50 2.38 Top: Includes small OCS29-30 D 27 0.08 8.6230-31 A 22 6.46 4.17 Top: Includes small OCS30-31 B 8 1.31 4.3830-31 CReplaceSoffit: Internal Delamination & 1.5" vertical separation & gap30-31 D 10 3 0.83 1.8931-32 A 5 26 6.67 3.35 Top: Includes small OCS31-32 B 17 16 0.42 5.96 0.46D-129Page 384 of 1126 Top Soffit Deck Shear Key CCS OCSBents PanelFRP Laminate (SF)Replace PanelNotesCrack Injection (LF)Top Deck Soffit / EdgeSpall Repairs (CF)31-32 C 11 11 0.25 0.25 0.2831-32 D 3.54 11.5132-33 AReplaceTop: Includes small OCSSoffit: 3/16" vertical offset at open spall 8' from Bent 33, Panel A 5/8" lower than B32-33 B 6 4.17 6.75 Top: Includes small OCS32-33 CReplaceSoffit: Longitudinal fractures NW & SW sides, Panel C 5/8" lower than fractured area32-33 D 32 18 2.88 0.0233-34 A 34 9 3.33 1.62 Top: Includes surface pops33-34 B 10 28 0.17 1.55 Soffit: Fracture 7' from 34 on North side33-34 C 10 3 0.63 0.49 2023 Epoxy crack injection repairs33-34 D Panel replaced in 202334-35 A-3 45 6 6.6434-35 A-2 20 14 0.81 0.5834-35 A-1 15 15 0.58 1.42 40.7134-35 A 15 14 1.04 1.0734-35 B 8 5 0.8634-35 C 5 9 1.0734-35 D 23 7 1.25 0.8334-35 D-1 24 15 1.9134-35 D-2 45 22 1.7134-35 D-3 25 3.1935-36 A-3 17 17 0.67 3.68 Top: Includes small OCS35-36 A-2 5 20 0.33 0.50 1.13 1.96Soffit: Fracture north side w/ horizontal separation 6' from Bent 3535-36 A-1 20 3 1.15 0.5335-36 A 8 4 0.17 1.81D-130Page 385 of 1126 Top Soffit Deck Shear Key CCS OCSBents PanelFRP Laminate (SF)Replace PanelNotesCrack Injection (LF)Top Deck Soffit / EdgeSpall Repairs (CF)35-36 BReplaceSoffit: OCS w/ heavy corrosion at soffit opening35-36 C 20 2 4.11 1.1135-36 D 10 2.3835-36 D-1 25 4 3.28 2.20 Top: Includes small OCS35-36 D-2 30 10 0.08 0.92 1.3835-36 D-3 35 10 3.01Total =15521417291011478413004LFLFSFCFCFCFSFLOCPanel Repair Assumptions1)All cracks 0.016" or larger are repaired with epoxy injection unless included in spall repair area or panel is replaced.2)Top deck CCS and delamination repair depth is assumed to be 1".3)Top deck OCS repair quantities are added to CCS repair quantities and shown in Top Deck Spall Repairs column.4)Top deck key joint spalls are assumed to be 3" deep.5)Soffit CCS repairs are assumed to be 3" max. deep.6)FRP Laminate repairs are assumed to extend 5' past repair area at each end to develop bond.AbbreviationsLF =Linear FeetSF =Square FeetCF =Cubic FeetLOC =LocationBot. =bottomCCS =Closed Corrosion SpallOCS =Open Corrosion SpallFRP =Fiber-Reinforced PolymerD-131Page 386 of 1126 E-1 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC APPENDIX E: BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATES FOR NEAR TERM PROJECTS Page 387 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER IDENTIFICATION NUMBERStructural Repairs Budgeting Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: CATEGORY CODE NUMBERPROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Structural Condition AssessmentSTATUS OF DESIGN: DELIVERY ORDER NUMBERHermosa Beach, CaliforniaCondition Assessment ReportITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL Deck Panel Concrete Repairs (13 Bays Over Water ~ 54 Panels ~35% of Total Deck Panels) Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 620 LF $55 $34,100 $75 $46,500 $130 $80,600 Soffit Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 250 CF $675 $168,750 $1,850 $462,500 $2,525 $631,250 Shoring for Deep Soffit Spalls - Steel Transverse Beams 6 LOC $4,250 $25,500 $10,500 $63,000 $14,750 $88,500 Deck Panel FRP Laminate Strengthening (14 Panels) Panel Soffit - Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Laminates 1300 SF $75 $97,500 $140 $182,000 $215 $279,500 Concrete Deck Panels - Remove and Replace (4 Panels) Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place 4 EA $50,000$200,000 $125,000 $500,000 $175,000 $700,000Mobilization and Demobilization1 LS $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000Pedestrian Traffic Control1 LS $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000Add'l Scaffolding for Soffit Repairs (Small Volume Bays)1 LS $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000Scaffolding, Formwork & Shoring - Included in Individual Unit Prices Unless Noted OtherwiseNEAR TERM STRUCTURAL REPAIRS - HIGH PRIORITY (Repairs within 1-2 Years)LABOR COSTSOFFIT CONCRETE REPAIRS IN BAYS 10-11, 12-13, 13-14, 15-16, 16-17, 17-18, 18-19, 21-22, 25-26, 27-28, 30-31, 32-33 & 35-36SOFFIT FRP REPAIRS TO PANELS 10-11: A, B & C; 12-13: B & C; 13-14: B & C; 15-16: B; 16-17: C; 17-18: D; 18:19: D; 21-22: B; 25-26: A & 27-28: CMATERIAL COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEBUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)10/14/2025PRELIMINARYQUANTITYREMOVE & REPLACE PANELS 30-31: C, 32-33: A, 32-33: C & 35-36: BE-2Page 388 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER IDENTIFICATION NUMBERStructural Repairs Budgeting Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: CATEGORY CODE NUMBERPROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Structural Condition AssessmentSTATUS OF DESIGN: DELIVERY ORDER NUMBERHermosa Beach, CaliforniaCondition Assessment ReportITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALRaw Construction Cost Subtotal$1,970,000Construction General Requirements Jobsite Controls 2.0% $39,400 BMP's 1.0% $19,700 Waste Management Plan 1.0% $19,700 Performance Bonding 1.0% $19,700 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $295,500Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL20.0%$2,364,000Construction Design & Administration Design Plans & Specifications 2.9% $68,600 Environmental Permitting 1.9% $44,900 Special Inspections 3.0% $70,900 Construction Contingency 25.0% $591,000 Construction Administration3.0% $70,900 Designer Construction & Bid Support1.5% $35,500TOTAL PROGRAM COST IN 2025 DOLLARS37.3%$3,246,000TOTAL PROGRAM COST IN 2027 DOLLARSAssumes 4% Inflation$3,511,000PRELIMINARYMATERIAL COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATENEAR TERM STRUCTURAL REPAIRS - HIGH PRIORITY (Repairs within 1-2 Years)BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)10/14/2025QUANTITYE-3Page 389 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER IDENTIFICATION NUMBERStructural Repairs Budgeting Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: CATEGORY CODE NUMBERPROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Structural Condition AssessmentSTATUS OF DESIGN: DELIVERY ORDER NUMBERHermosa Beach, CaliforniaCondition Assessment ReportITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL Deck Panel Concrete Repairs (12 Bays Over Water ~ 52 Panels + ~ 24 Panels Over Beach) ~ 45% of total deck soffit Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 800 LF $55 $44,000 $75 $60,000 $130 $104,000 Soffit Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 240 CF $675 $162,000 $1,850 $444,000 $2,525 $606,000 Deck Panel Concrete Top Repairs Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 1550 LF $10 $15,500 $15 $23,250 $25 $38,750 Top Surface Spall Repairs - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 3000 SF $40 $120,000 $65 $195,000 $105 $315,000 Pile Cap Concrete Repairs Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 220 CF $675 $148,500 $1,750 $385,000 $2,425 $533,500 Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps (6 locations) 130 LF $55 $7,150 $70 $9,100 $125 $16,250Mobilization and Demobilization1 LS $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000Pedestrian Traffic Control1 LS $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000Add'l Scaffolding for Soffit Repairs (Small Volume Bays)1 LS $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000Scaffolding, Formwork & Shoring - Included in Individual Unit Prices Unless Noted OtherwiseNEAR TERM STRUCTURAL REPAIRS - MEDIUM PRIORITY (Repairs in 3-5 Years)SOFFIT CONCRETE REPAIRS IN BAYS 11-12, 14-15, 19-20, 20-21, 22-23, 23-24, 24-25, 26-27, 28-29, 29-30, 31-32, 33-34 & 34-35DECK TOP SURFACE REPAIRS (Top Repairs to Portions of ~90% of Panels)PILE CAP SPALL REPAIRS (Spall Repairs to Portions of ~80% of Pile Caps)LABOR COSTMATERIAL COSTBUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)10/14/2025PRELIMINARYQUANTITY ENGINEERING ESTIMATEE-4Page 390 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER IDENTIFICATION NUMBERStructural Repairs Budgeting Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: CATEGORY CODE NUMBERPROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Structural Condition AssessmentSTATUS OF DESIGN: DELIVERY ORDER NUMBERHermosa Beach, CaliforniaCondition Assessment ReportITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALRaw Construction Cost Subtotal$1,869,000Construction General Requirements Jobsite Controls 2.0% $37,400 BMP's 1.0% $18,700 Waste Management Plan 1.0% $18,700 Performance Bonding 1.0% $18,700 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $280,400Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL20.0%$2,243,000Construction Design & Administration Design Plans & Specifications 3.0% $67,300 Environmental Permitting 2.0% $44,900 Special Inspections 3.0% $67,300 Construction Contingency 30.0% $672,900 Construction Administration 3.5% $78,500 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.0% $44,900TOTAL PROGRAM COST IN 2025 DOLLARS43.5%$3,219,000TOTAL PROGRAM COST IN 2030 DOLLARSAssumes 4% Inflation$3,916,000NEAR TERM STRUCTURAL REPAIRS - MEDIUM PRIORITY (Repairs in 3-5 Years)BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)QUANTITY10/14/2025MATERIAL COST LABOR COSTPRELIMINARYENGINEERING ESTIMATEE-5Page 391 of 1126 F-1 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC APPENDIX F: INSPECTION PROCEDURE Page 392 of 1126 F-2 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC INSPECTION PROCEDURE 1. INSPECTION INTRODUCTION To efficiently communicate the results of this inspection to reviewers of this report, it is necessary that common terminology and methodology be established. The following are definitions of standard levels of effort that are required in all inspections and were followed in this inspection. The Scope of Work for all inspections breaks down the total inspection effort into these levels and specifies the amount of work required in each level. The procedures prescribed for most inspections are commonly a combination of at least two of these levels of examination. The terms Level I and Level II, etc., are referred to frequently in the Scope of Work and in each inspection report. Their definitions are as follows: LEVEL I: General Examination: This level of effort is essentially a “swim-by” overview, which does not involve cleaning of any structural elements and can therefore be conducted much more rapidly than the other levels of examination. The Level I examination should confirm as-built structural plans and detect obvious major damage or deterioration due to overstress (ship impact, ice), severe corrosion, or extensive biological growth and attack. The underwater inspector shall rely primarily on visual and/or tactile observations (depending on water clarity) to make condition assessments. The observations are normally made over the total exterior surface area of the underwater structure, be it a quaywall, bulkhead, seawall, pile, or mooring. Visual documentation (utilizing underwater video and/or photography) may be included with the quantity and quality adequate for documentation of the findings which will be representative of the facility condition. LEVEL II: Detailed Examination: This level of effort is directed toward detecting and identifying damaged/deteriorated areas which may be hidden by biofouling organisms or surface deterioration. At this level, a limited amount of measurements may be made. These data should be sufficient to permit estimates of relative condition of the facility load capacity to be made. Level II examinations will often require cleaning of structural elements. Since cleaning is time consuming, it is generally restricted to areas that are critical or which may be representative of the entire structure itself. The amount and thoroughness of cleaning to be performed is governed by what is necessary to discern the general condition of overall facility. Visual documentation (utilizing underwater video and/or photography) should be included with the quantity and quality adequate to be representative of the range of facility damage/deterioration. LEVEL III: Highly Detailed Examination: This level of effort will often require the use of Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) techniques, but may also require the use of partially destructive techniques such as sample coring through concrete and wood structures, physical material sampling, or in-situ surface hardness testing. The purpose of this type of evaluation is to detect hidden or interior damage, loss in Page 393 of 1126 F-3 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC cross-sectional area, and material homogeneity. A Level III examination will usually require prior cleaning. The use of NDT techniques is generally limited to key structural areas, areas that may be suspect or to structural members which may be representative of the underwater structure. Visual documentation (utilizing underwater video and/or photography) and a sampling of physical measurements should be included with quantity and quality adequate for documentation of the findings which will be representative of the facility condition. 2. INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS An above and underwater examination was performed at the Municipal Pier in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. The Level of Examination as applied to this facility was limited to Levels I & II examinations. The Level I examination was performed on 100% of the octagonal precast prestressed concrete piles, cast-in- place concrete pile caps, and precast concrete deck panels. The Level I examination was conducted both above and below water. The Level II Examination was performed on 10% of the concrete piles. These piles were selected by the engineers as a representative sample of the entire structure. Marine growth was removed on the piles in three bands (waterline, mudline, and mid-height) to allow for close inspection. The objective of this inspection was to inspect the structural elements of the entire pier above and below water to prioritize maintenance needs and obtain required information to develop construction plans for recommended repairs. 3. INSPECTION PATTERN / PROCEDURE The work was conducted using two engineer divers with one diving tender, depending on the activity and circumstances. The divers were in the same vicinity at all times so that the single tender did not represent a violation of safe diving standards. Communication between divers and tenders was by voice. The Lifeguard Service was notified daily before work began of the inspection plan and informed again once work was finished for the day. The underside of deck inspection was performed using two access methods. Elements over the beach were inspected using a rough terrain boom lift and elements over the water were inspected by access from a trailerable scaffold rig. The surfaces of the concrete deck panels and pile caps were sounded with a hammer or solid steel headed putter to identify areas of delaminated, weak, damaged, or spalled concrete. A crack width gauge was used to record crack widths greater than hairline width. The visible concrete deterioration was recorded on underwater slates according to the following types of deterioration: Vertical Crack (VCR); Horizontal Crack (HCR); Diagonal Crack (DCR), Transverse Crack (TC); or Longitudinal Crack; Closed Corrosion Spall (CCS); Open Corrosion Spall (OCS); Corrosion Bleeding; Overstress Fracture; and Delamination. Page 394 of 1126 F-4 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC The surfaces of the concrete deck panels and pile caps were sounded with a hammer to identify areas of delaminated, weak, or spalled concrete. For the Level II examination, and in areas of anomalies, the piles were struck with a pointed hammer to gauge the soundness of the concrete. The soundness was recorded according to the following nomenclature: Hard: Pick rebounds without making a significant indentation, usually accompanied by a ringing sound clearly heard in the water. Firm: Pick rebounds making a small indentation. Soft: With six blows, ¼ inch to ½ inch indentation can be made. Very Soft: Six blows remove corner of the pile or in excess of ½ inch to 1 inch of material. Extremely Soft: Six blows remove in excess of 1 inch of material. Grid locations are identified using the following nomenclature: BENT LOCATION: ROW LOCATION (e.g. 16: A) 4. INSPECTION EQUIPMENT Equipment used in this inspection included the usual divers’ equipment with scuba gear. Chipping hammers and bar scrapers were used to clean the piles at the suspect areas. Photographs were taken both above and below water using a SeaLife Micro 3.0 Underwater Camera. The following figure describes the orientation used for all structural elements: Page 395 of 1126 F-5 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Page 396 of 1126 F-6 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Damage Rating Scale Damage Rating Description No Defects All - Sound surface material - Hard material Minor (Light) Timber - Marine borers or fungal decay - No section loss Steel - Up to 15% section loss - Corrosion at less than 50% of perimeter Reinforced Concrete - Surface spalls less than 1” deep - General cracks up to 1/16” in width Moderate Timber - Up to 25% section loss Steel - 15% to 30% section loss - Corrosion at more than 50% of perimeter Reinforced Concrete - Structural cracks up to 1/16” in width - Corrosion cracks up to 1/4” in width Major (Heavy) Timber - 25% to 50% section loss - Full depth checks and splits Steel - 30% to 50% section loss - Partial loss of flange edges or pipe thickness Reinforced Concrete - Structural cracks 1/16” to 1/4” in width - Corrosion cracks wider than 1/4” and open or closed corrosion spalling Severe Timber - Greater than 50% section loss - Partial or complete breakage - Non-bearing condition Steel - Greater than 50% section loss - Structural bends, buckling, or breakage - Displacement at supports - Loose or lost connections Reinforced Concrete - Structural cracks wider than 1/4” - Complete breakage - Complete loss of concrete cover due to corrosion of rebar with greater than 30% rebar section loss - Loss of bearing and displacement at connections - Greater than 30% section loss Source: “Waterfront Facilities Inspection and Assessment”, ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 130, Waterfront Facility Inspection Committee, 2015 Page 397 of 1126 F-7 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC Condition Assessment Rating Scale Rating CI Rating Description Good 90 No visible damage or only minor damage noted. Structural elements may show very minor deterioration, but no overstressing observed. No repairs are required. Satisfactory 75 Limited minor to moderate defects or deterioration observed but no overstressing observed. Fair 60 All primary structural elements are sound but minor to moderate defects or deterioration observed. Localized areas of moderate to advanced deterioration may be present but do not significantly reduce the load-bearing capacity of the structure. Repairs are recommended, but the priority of the recommended repairs is low. Poor 45 Advanced deterioration or overstressing observed on widespread portions of the structure but does not significantly reduce the load- bearing capacity of the structure. Repairs may need to be carried out with moderate urgency. Serious 30 Advanced deterioration, overstressing, or breakage may have significantly affected the load-bearing capacity of primary structural components. Local failures are possible and loading restrictions may be necessary. Repairs may need to be carried out on a high-priority basis with urgency. Critical 15 Very advanced deterioration, overstressing, or breakage has resulted in localized failure(s) of primary structural components. More widespread failures are possible or likely to occur, and load restrictions should be implemented as necessary. Repairs may need to be carried out on a very high-priority basis with strong urgency. Source: “Waterfront Facilities Inspection and Assessment”, ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 130, Waterfront Facility Inspection Committee, 2015. Page 398 of 1126 G-1 Hermosa Beach Pier 2024 Condion Assessment ESN Engineering, PLLC APPENDIX G: COST / BENEFIT ANALYSIS – COST ESTIMATES & SCHEDULES Page 399 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 16 EA $5,000$80,000$8,000$128,000$13,000$208,000 $26,000 $416,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 240 CF $275$66,000$1,100$264,000$1,050$252,000 $2,425 $582,000C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 150 LF $30$4,500$40$6,000$55$8,250 $125 $18,750D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 250 CF $275$68,750$1,100$275,000$1,150$287,500 $2,525 $631,250E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 250 LF $30$7,500$40$10,000$60$15,000 $130 $32,500F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 1800 LF $8$14,400$2$3,600$15$27,000 $25 $45,000G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 5000 SF $40$200,000$5$25,000$60$300,000 $105 $525,000H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates 400 SF $70$28,000$55$22,000$90$36,000 $215 $86,000J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place EA $50,000 $30,000 $95,000$175,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$2,337,000PLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2035 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSG-2Page 400 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $117,000 General Requirements 5.0% $117,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $351,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 25.0% $2,922,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 3.0% $88,000 Environmental Permitting 2.5% $73,000 Design Plans & Specifications 5.0% $146,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.5% $73,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $88,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $117,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $877,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 50.0% $4,384,000TOTAL ESCALATED PROJECT COST IN2035DOLLARS ASSUMING ANNUAL INFLATION OF 4.0%$6,490,000ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE Start FinishField Investigations 120 DAY5/14/2033 9/11/2033Design Plans & Specifications 150 DAY9/11/2033 2/8/2034Environmental Permitting 420 DAY2/8/2034 4/4/2035Bidding & Contracting 150 DAY4/4/2035 9/1/2035Construction 210 DAY 9/1/20353/29/2036ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2035 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COSTG-3Page 401 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 17 EA $5,000$85,000$8,000$136,000$13,000$221,000 $26,000 $442,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 265 CF $275$72,875$1,100$291,500$1,050$278,250 $2,425 $642,625C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 160 LF $30$4,800$40$6,400$55$8,800 $125 $20,000D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 275 CF $275$75,625$1,100$302,500$1,150$316,250 $2,525 $694,375E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 300 LF $30$9,000$40$12,000$60$18,000 $130 $39,000F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 2000 LF $8$16,000$2$4,000$15$30,000 $25 $50,000G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 6000 SF $40$240,000$5$30,000$60$360,000 $105 $630,000H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates 500 SF $70$35,000$55$27,500$90$45,000 $215 $107,500J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place 1 EA $50,000$50,000$30,000$30,000$95,000$95,000 $175,000 $175,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$2,801,000PLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2040 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSG-4Page 402 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $140,000 General Requirements 5.0% $140,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $420,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 25.0% $3,501,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 3.0% $105,000 Environmental Permitting 2.5% $88,000 Design Plans & Specifications 5.0% $175,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.5% $88,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $105,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $140,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $1,050,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 50.0% $5,252,000TOTAL ESCALATED PROJECT COST IN2040DOLLARS ASSUMING ANNUAL INFLATION OF 4.0%$9,459,000ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE Start FinishField Investigations 120 DAY5/15/2038 9/12/2038Design Plans & Specifications 150 DAY9/12/2038 2/9/2039Environmental Permitting 420 DAY2/9/2039 4/4/2040Bidding & Contracting 150 DAY4/4/2040 9/1/2040Construction 210 DAY 9/1/20403/30/2041ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2040 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COSTG-5Page 403 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 18 EA $5,000$90,000$8,000$144,000$13,000$234,000 $26,000 $468,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 295 CF $275$81,125$1,100$324,500$1,050$309,750 $2,425 $715,375C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 175 LF $30$5,250$40$7,000$55$9,625 $125 $21,875D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 300 CF $275$82,500$1,100$330,000$1,150$345,000 $2,525 $757,500E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 400 LF $30$12,000$40$16,000$60$24,000 $130 $52,000F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 2200 LF $8$17,600$2$4,400$15$33,000 $25 $55,000G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 6700 SF $40$268,000$5$33,500$60$402,000 $105 $703,500H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates 600 SF $70$42,000$55$33,000$90$54,000 $215 $129,000J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place 1 EA $50,000$50,000$30,000$30,000$95,000$95,000 $175,000 $175,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$3,077,000PLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2045 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSG-6Page 404 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $154,000 General Requirements 5.0% $154,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $462,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 25.0% $3,847,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 3.0% $115,000 Environmental Permitting 2.5% $96,000 Design Plans & Specifications 5.0% $192,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.5% $96,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $115,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $154,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $1,154,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 50.0% $5,769,000TOTAL ESCALATED PROJECT COST IN2045DOLLARS ASSUMING ANNUAL INFLATION OF 4.0%$12,641,000ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE Start FinishField Investigations 120 DAY5/15/2043 9/12/2043Design Plans & Specifications 150 DAY9/12/2043 2/9/2044Environmental Permitting 420 DAY2/9/2044 4/4/2045Bidding & Contracting 150 DAY4/4/2045 9/1/2045Construction 210 DAY 9/1/20453/30/2046ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2045 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COSTG-7Page 405 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 19 EA $5,000$95,000$8,000$152,000$13,000$247,000 $26,000 $494,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 325 CF $275$89,375$1,100$357,500$1,050$341,250 $2,425 $788,125C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 190 LF $30$5,700$40$7,600$55$10,450 $125 $23,750D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 330 CF $275$90,750$1,100$363,000$1,150$379,500 $2,525 $833,250E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 500 LF $30$15,000$40$20,000$60$30,000 $130 $65,000F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 2400 LF $8$19,200$2$4,800$15$36,000 $25 $60,000G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 7300 SF $40$292,000$5$36,500$60$438,000 $105 $766,500H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates 700 SF $70$49,000$55$38,500$90$63,000 $215 $150,500J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place 2 EA $50,000$100,000$30,000$60,000$95,000$190,000 $175,000 $350,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$3,531,000PLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2050 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSG-8Page 406 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $177,000 General Requirements 5.0% $177,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $530,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 25.0% $4,415,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 3.0% $132,000 Environmental Permitting 2.5% $110,000 Design Plans & Specifications 5.0% $221,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.5% $110,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $132,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $177,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $1,325,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 50.0% $6,622,000TOTAL ESCALATED PROJECT COST IN2050DOLLARS ASSUMING ANNUAL INFLATION OF 4.0%$17,654,000ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE Start FinishField Investigations 120 DAY5/14/2048 9/11/2048Design Plans & Specifications 150 DAY9/11/2048 2/8/2049Environmental Permitting 420 DAY2/8/2049 4/4/2050Bidding & Contracting 150 DAY4/4/2050 9/1/2050Construction 210 DAY 9/1/20503/30/2051ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2050 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COSTG-9Page 407 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 20 EA $5,000$100,000$8,000$160,000$13,000$260,000 $26,000 $520,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 355 CF $275$97,625$1,100$390,500$1,050$372,750 $2,425 $860,875C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 210 LF $30$6,300$40$8,400$55$11,550 $125 $26,250D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 390 CF $275$107,250$1,100$429,000$1,150$448,500 $2,525 $984,750E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 600 LF $30$18,000$40$24,000$60$36,000 $130 $78,000F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 2600 LF $8$20,800$2$5,200$15$39,000 $25 $65,000G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 8000 SF $40$320,000$5$40,000$60$480,000 $105 $840,000H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates 800 SF $70$56,000$55$44,000$90$72,000 $215 $172,000J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place 2 EA $50,000$100,000$30,000$60,000$95,000$190,000 $175,000 $350,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$3,897,000PLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2055 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSG-10Page 408 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $195,000 General Requirements 5.0% $195,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $585,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 25.0% $4,872,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 3.0% $146,000 Environmental Permitting 2.5% $122,000 Design Plans & Specifications 5.0% $244,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.5% $122,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $146,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $195,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $1,462,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 50.0% $7,309,000TOTAL ESCALATED PROJECT COST IN2055DOLLARS ASSUMING ANNUAL INFLATION OF 4.0%$23,706,000ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE Start FinishField Investigations 120 DAY5/14/2053 9/11/2053Design Plans & Specifications 150 DAY9/11/2053 2/8/2054Environmental Permitting 420 DAY2/8/2054 4/4/2055Bidding & Contracting 150 DAY4/4/2055 9/1/2055Construction 210 DAY 9/1/20553/29/2056ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2055 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COSTG-11Page 409 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 21 EA $5,000$105,000$8,000$168,000$13,000$273,000 $26,000 $546,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 390 CF $275$107,250$1,100$429,000$1,050$409,500 $2,425 $945,750C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 230 LF $30$6,900$40$9,200$55$12,650 $125 $28,750D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 440 CF $275$121,000$1,100$484,000$1,150$506,000 $2,525 $1,111,000E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 750 LF $30$22,500$40$30,000$60$45,000 $130 $97,500F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 2900 LF $8$23,200$2$5,800$15$43,500 $25 $72,500G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 8900 SF $40$356,000$5$44,500$60$534,000 $105 $934,500H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates 900 SF $70$63,000$55$49,500$90$81,000 $215 $193,500J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place 2 EA $50,000$100,000$30,000$60,000$95,000$190,000 $175,000 $350,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$4,280,000PLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2060 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSG-12Page 410 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $214,000 General Requirements 5.0% $214,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $642,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 25.0% $5,350,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 3.0% $161,000 Environmental Permitting 2.5% $134,000 Design Plans & Specifications 5.0% $268,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.5% $134,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $161,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $214,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $1,605,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 50.0% $8,027,000TOTAL ESCALATED PROJECT COST IN2060DOLLARS ASSUMING ANNUAL INFLATION OF 4.0%$31,676,000ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE Start FinishField Investigations 120 DAY5/15/2058 9/12/2058Design Plans & Specifications 150 DAY9/12/2058 2/9/2059Environmental Permitting 420 DAY2/9/2059 4/4/2060Bidding & Contracting 150 DAY4/4/2060 9/1/2060Construction 210 DAY 9/1/20603/30/2061ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2060 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COSTG-13Page 411 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 22 EA $5,000$110,000$8,000$176,000$13,000$286,000 $26,000 $572,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 430 CF $275$118,250$1,100$473,000$1,050$451,500 $2,425 $1,042,750C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 255 LF $30$7,650$40$10,200$55$14,025 $125 $31,875D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 490 CF $275$134,750$1,100$539,000$1,150$563,500 $2,525 $1,237,250E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 850 LF $30$25,500$40$34,000$60$51,000 $130 $110,500F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 3200 LF $8$25,600$2$6,400$15$48,000 $25 $80,000G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 9700 SF $40$388,000$5$48,500$60$582,000 $105 $1,018,500H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates 1000 SF $70$70,000$55$55,000$90$90,000 $215 $215,000J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place 3 EA $50,000$150,000$30,000$90,000$95,000$285,000 $175,000 $525,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$4,833,000PLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2065 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSG-14Page 412 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $242,000 General Requirements 5.0% $242,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $725,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 25.0% $6,042,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 3.0% $181,000 Environmental Permitting 2.5% $151,000 Design Plans & Specifications 5.0% $302,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.5% $151,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $181,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $242,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $1,813,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 50.0% $9,063,000TOTAL ESCALATED PROJECT COST IN2065DOLLARS ASSUMING ANNUAL INFLATION OF 4.0%$43,512,000ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE Start FinishField Investigations 120 DAY5/15/2063 9/12/2063Design Plans & Specifications 150 DAY9/12/2063 2/9/2064Environmental Permitting 420 DAY2/9/2064 4/4/2065Bidding & Contracting 150 DAY4/4/2065 9/1/2065Construction 210 DAY 9/1/20653/30/2066ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2065 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COSTG-15Page 413 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 23 EA $5,000$115,000$8,000$184,000$13,000$299,000 $26,000 $598,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 475 CF $275$130,625$1,100$522,500$1,050$498,750 $2,425 $1,151,875C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 280 LF $30$8,400$40$11,200$55$15,400 $125 $35,000D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 540 CF $275$148,500$1,100$594,000$1,150$621,000 $2,525 $1,363,500E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 950 LF $30$28,500$40$38,000$60$57,000 $130 $123,500F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 3500 LF $8$28,000$2$7,000$15$52,500 $25 $87,500G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 10700 SF $40$428,000$5$53,500$60$642,000 $105 $1,123,500H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates 1200 SF $70$84,000$55$66,000$90$108,000 $215 $258,000J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place 3 EA $50,000$150,000$30,000$90,000$95,000$285,000 $175,000 $525,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$5,266,000PLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2070 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSG-16Page 414 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $263,000 General Requirements 5.0% $263,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $790,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 25.0% $6,582,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 3.0% $197,000 Environmental Permitting 2.5% $165,000 Design Plans & Specifications 5.0% $329,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.5% $165,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $197,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $263,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $1,975,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 50.0% $9,873,000TOTAL ESCALATED PROJECT COST IN2070DOLLARS ASSUMING ANNUAL INFLATION OF 4.0%$57,670,000ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE Start FinishField Investigations 120 DAY5/14/2068 9/11/2068Design Plans & Specifications 150 DAY9/11/2068 2/8/2069Environmental Permitting 420 DAY2/8/2069 4/4/2070Bidding & Contracting 150 DAY4/4/2070 9/1/2070Construction 210 DAY 9/1/20703/30/2071ENGINEERING ESTIMATE2070 PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTSPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COSTG-17Page 415 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Replacement Planning Cost Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Demolish Existing Pier$157/ SF Cutoff Concrete Piles at Mudline & Dispose 135EA $10$1,350$260$35,100$295$39,825 $565 $76,275 Remove & Dispose Concrete Pile Caps 36 EA $170$6,120$8,950$322,200$9,460$340,560 $18,580 $668,880 Remove & Dispose Concrete Deck Panels 24840 SF $2$49,680$50$1,242,000$60$1,490,400 $112 $2,782,080 Remove & Dispose Metal Railing 2360 LF $2$4,720$15$35,400$30$70,800 $47 $110,920 Remove & Dispose Utilities 24840 SF $1$24,840$5$124,200$5$124,200 $11 $273,240 Relocate / Salvage Surface Amenities 85 EA $1$85$25$2,125$100$8,500 $126 $10,710 (~60 Surfer Plaques, ~25 Benches, ~10 Trash Cans)B) Build New Pier Structure$589/ SF Build New Concrete Pier Structure 25000 SF $165$4,125,000$135$3,375,000$270$6,750,000 $570 $14,250,000 Install New Metal Guardrailing 2500 LF $75$187,500$25$62,500$75$187,500 $175 $437,500 Install New Metal Gate 1 EA $15,000$15,000$5,000$5,000$10,000$10,000 $30,000 $30,000C) Pier Utilities & Amenities$103/ SF Electrical, Lighting, Water, Sewer, Telecomm 25000 SF $25$625,000$15$375,000$40$1,000,000 $80 $2,000,000 Benches, Trash Cans, Bait Stations, Fog Horn 25000 SF $8$200,000$3$75,000$8$200,000 $19 $475,000 Utility Realignment at New Pierhead 1 LS $35,000$35,000$30,000$30,000$35,000$35,000 $100,000 $100,000D) Pier Construction Phasing Staging, Temporary Conditions, Traffic Controls 18 MO $400$7,200$5,000$90,000$30,000$540,000 $35,400 $637,200 Phasing / Temporary Structure for Pier Access18 MO $30,000$540,000$25,000$450,000$50,000$900,000 $105,000 $1,890,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$950/ SF$23,742,000Construction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $1,187,000 General Requirements 5.0% $1,187,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $3,561,000PLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEREPLACE MUNICIPAL PIERG-18Page 416 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Replacement Planning Cost Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALBurdened Cost SUBTOTAL25.0%$29,677,000Construction Design & Administration Planning Studies 1.0% $297,000 Public Outreach 1.0% $297,000 Environmental Assessment & Permitting 4.0% $1,187,000 Grant Funding Applications - Consultant Assistance 0.5% $148,000 Field Investigations 1.0% $297,000 Topographic & Hydrographic Surveys 0.5% $148,000 Geotechnical Investigations 1.0% $297,000 Design Plans & Specifications 5.0% $1,484,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 1.0% $297,000 Special Inspections 2.0% $594,000 Construction Administration 3.0% $890,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $8,903,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS50.0%$1,781/ SF$44,516,000TOTAL ESCALATED PROJECT COST IN2032DOLLARS ASSUMING ANNUAL INFLATION OF4.0%$58,580,000ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE Start FinishPlanning Studies & Public Outreach 540 DAY12/7/2025 5/31/202718 monthsEnvironmental Assessment 1020 DAY5/31/2027 3/16/203034 monthsField Investigations 180 DAY3/16/2030 9/12/20306 monthsDesign Plans & Specifications 180 DAY9/12/2030 3/11/20316 monthsEnvironmental Permitting 420 DAY3/11/2031 5/4/203214 monthsBidding & Contracting 150 DAY5/4/2032 10/1/20325 monthsConstruction 540 DAY 10/1/20323/25/203418 months8.3yearsENGINEERING ESTIMATEREPLACE MUNICIPAL PIERPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COSTG-19Page 417 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket EA $5,000 $8,000 $13,000$26,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 35 CF $275$9,625$1,100$38,500$1,050$36,750 $2,425 $84,875C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 50 LF $30$1,500$40$2,000$55$2,750 $125 $6,250D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish CF $275 $1,100 $1,150$2,525E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit LF $30 $40 $60$130F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 400 LF$8$3,200$2$800$15$6,000 $25 $10,000G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 350 SF $40$14,000$5$1,750$60$21,000 $105 $36,750H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates SF $70 $55 $90$215J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place EA $50,000 $30,000 $95,000$175,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$138,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 15 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-20Page 418 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $7,000 General Requirements 15.0% $21,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $21,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 35.0% $187,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 8.0% $15,000 Environmental Permitting 7.0% $13,000 Design Plans & Specifications 9.0% $17,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 3.0% $6,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $6,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $7,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $56,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 64.0% $307,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 15 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-21Page 419 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 4 EA $5,000$20,000$8,000$32,000$13,000$52,000 $26,000 $104,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 50 CF $275$13,750$1,100$55,000$1,050$52,500 $2,425 $121,250C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 60 LF $30$1,800$40$2,400$55$3,300 $125 $7,500D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 25 CF $275$6,875$1,100$27,500$1,150$28,750 $2,525 $63,125E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 50 LF $30$1,500$40$2,000$60$3,000 $130 $6,500F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 600 LF$8$4,800$2$1,200$15$9,000 $25 $15,000G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 600 SF $40$24,000$5$3,000$60$36,000 $105 $63,000H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates SF $70 $55 $90$215J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place EA $50,000 $30,000 $95,000$175,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$380,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 20 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-22Page 420 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $19,000 General Requirements 10.0% $38,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $57,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 30.0% $494,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 9.0% $44,000 Environmental Permitting 6.0% $30,000 Design Plans & Specifications 7.0% $35,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 3.0% $15,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $15,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $20,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $148,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 62.0% $801,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 20 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-23Page 421 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 5 EA $5,000$25,000$8,000$40,000$13,000$65,000 $26,000 $130,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 100 CF $275$27,500$1,100$110,000$1,050$105,000 $2,425 $242,500C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 70 LF $30$2,100$40$2,800$55$3,850 $125 $8,750D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 50 CF $275$13,750$1,100$55,000$1,150$57,500 $2,525 $126,250E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 100 LF $30$3,000$40$4,000$60$6,000 $130 $13,000F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 800 LF$8$6,400$2$1,600$15$12,000 $25 $20,000G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 1100 SF $40$44,000$5$5,500$60$66,000 $105 $115,500H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates SF $70 $55 $90$215J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place EA $50,000 $30,000 $95,000$175,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$656,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 25 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-24Page 422 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $33,000 General Requirements 8.0% $52,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $98,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 28.0% $839,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 6.0% $50,000 Environmental Permitting 3.5% $29,000 Design Plans & Specifications 6.0% $50,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.5% $21,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $25,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $34,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $252,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 55.0% $1,300,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 25 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-25Page 423 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 6 EA $5,000$30,000$8,000$48,000$13,000$78,000 $26,000 $156,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 125 CF $275$34,375$1,100$137,500$1,050$131,250 $2,425 $303,125C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 80 LF $30$2,400$40$3,200$55$4,400 $125 $10,000D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 100 CF $275$27,500$1,100$110,000$1,150$115,000 $2,525 $252,500E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 200 LF $30$6,000$40$8,000$60$12,000 $130 $26,000F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 1100 LF $8$8,800$2$2,200$15$16,500 $25 $27,500G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 1900 SF $40$76,000$5$9,500$60$114,000 $105 $199,500H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates SF $70 $55 $90$215J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place EA $50,000 $30,000 $95,000$175,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$975,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 30 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-26Page 424 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $49,000 General Requirements 6.0% $59,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $146,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 26.0% $1,229,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 4.5% $55,000 Environmental Permitting 2.5% $31,000 Design Plans & Specifications 5.0% $61,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.5% $31,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $37,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $49,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $369,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 51.5% $1,862,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 30 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-27Page 425 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 7 EA $5,000$35,000$8,000$56,000$13,000$91,000 $26,000 $182,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 150 CF $275$41,250$1,100$165,000$1,050$157,500 $2,425 $363,750C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 90 LF $30$2,700$40$3,600$55$4,950 $125 $11,250D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 150 CF $275$41,250$1,100$165,000$1,150$172,500 $2,525 $378,750E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 300 LF $30$9,000$40$12,000$60$18,000 $130 $39,000F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 1600 LF $8$12,800$2$3,200$15$24,000 $25 $40,000G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 3200 SF $40$128,000$5$16,000$60$192,000 $105 $336,000H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates SF $70 $55 $90$215J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place EA $50,000 $30,000 $95,000$175,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$1,351,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 35 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-28Page 426 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $68,000 General Requirements 5.0% $68,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $203,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 25.0% $1,690,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 3.0% $51,000 Environmental Permitting 2.5% $42,000 Design Plans & Specifications 5.0% $85,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.5% $42,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $51,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $68,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $507,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 50.0% $2,536,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 35 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-29Page 427 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 8 EA $5,000$40,000$8,000$64,000$13,000$104,000 $26,000 $208,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 200 CF $275$55,000$1,100$220,000$1,050$210,000 $2,425 $485,000C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 100 LF $30$3,000$40$4,000$55$5,500 $125 $12,500D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 200 CF $275$55,000$1,100$220,000$1,150$230,000 $2,525 $505,000E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 400 LF $30$12,000$40$16,000$60$24,000 $130 $52,000F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 2100 LF $8$16,800$2$4,200$15$31,500 $25 $52,500G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 6000 SF $40$240,000$5$30,000$60$360,000 $105 $630,000H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates 300 SF $70$21,000$55$16,500$90$27,000 $215 $64,500J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place EA $50,000 $30,000 $95,000$175,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$2,010,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 40 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-30Page 428 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $101,000 General Requirements 5.0% $101,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $302,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 25.0% $2,514,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 3.0% $75,000 Environmental Permitting 2.5% $63,000 Design Plans & Specifications 5.0% $126,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.5% $63,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $75,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $101,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $754,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 50.0% $3,771,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 40 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-31Page 429 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 1 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALA) Pile Jacket Repair Install Fiberglass Grouted Pile Jacket 9 EA $5,000$45,000$8,000$72,000$13,000$117,000 $26,000 $234,000B) Pile Cap Spall Repair Spall Repairs - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 250 CF $275$68,750$1,100$275,000$1,050$262,500 $2,425 $606,250C) Pile Cap Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Pile Caps 110 LF $30$3,300$40$4,400$55$6,050 $125 $13,750D) Deck Panel Soffit Spall Repair Soffit Spalls - Demo, Rebar, Prep, Patch, Finish 250 CF $275$68,750$1,100$275,000$1,150$287,500 $2,525 $631,250E) Deck Panel Soffit Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Soffit 500 LF $30$15,000$40$20,000$60$30,000 $130 $65,000F) Deck Panel Top Crack Repair Epoxy Crack Injection - Deck Top Surface 2600 LF $8$20,800$2$5,200$15$39,000 $25 $65,000G) Deck Panel Top Spall Repair Top Surface Spalls - Demo, Prep, Patch, Finish 6500 SF $40$260,000$5$32,500$60$390,000 $105 $682,500H) Deck Panel FRP Strengthening Panel Soffit - FRP Laminates 400 SF $70$28,000$55$22,000$90$36,000 $215 $86,000J) Deck Panel Replacement in-kind Deck Panels - Remove, Cast-in-Place EA $50,000 $30,000 $95,000$175,000Raw Construction Cost Subtotal$2,384,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 45 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-32Page 430 of 1126 DATE PREPARED:SHEET: 2 OF 2ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: A/E CONTRACT NUMBER: A/E PROJECT NUMBER:Hermosa Beach Pier Capital Planning Hermosa Beach, CAESTIMATED BY: TASK NUMBER:PROJECT TITLE:ESN ENGINEERING, PLLCMunicipal Pier Cost / Benefit AnalysisSTATUS OF DESIGN: PHASE NUMBER:Hermosa Beach, CaliforniaCapital Improvement PlanningITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTALConstruction General Requirements Mobilization 5.0% $119,000 General Requirements 5.0% $119,000 Contractor Overhead and Profit 15.0% $358,000Burdened Cost SUBTOTAL 25.0% $2,980,000Construction Design & Administration Field Investigations 3.0% $89,000 Environmental Permitting 2.5% $75,000 Design Plans & Specifications 5.0% $149,000 Designer Construction & Bid Support 2.5% $75,000 Special Inspections 3.0% $89,000 Construction Administration 4.0% $119,000 Construction Contingency 30.0% $894,000TOTAL PROJECT COST IN 2025 DOLLARS 50.0% $4,470,000NEW PIER ANTICIPATED MAINTENANCE COSTS - 45 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTEDPLANNING BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE (2025 Dollars)PRELIMINARY11/13/2025QUANTITY MATERIAL COST EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATEG-33Page 431 of 1126 Total Pier Costs (2025 - 2070) Based on Year that Pier is Replaced Total Costs: 108,130,694$ 106,957,513$ 106,615,124$ 106,229,554$ 106,117,090$ 105,599,978$ 103,898,975$ 104,542,547$ 105,211,863$ 105,659,695$ 107,625,922$ 109,670,798$ 111,797,469$ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 1 2026 17,120,133$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 2 2027 16,049,502$ 16,049,502$ 877,718$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 3 2028 16,691,482$ 16,691,482$ 16,691,482$ 5,624$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 4 2029 11,699$ 17,359,141$ 17,359,141$ 17,359,141$ 5,849$ 5,849$ 5,849$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 5 2030 12,167$ 12,167$ 18,053,507$ 18,053,507$ 18,053,507$ 6,083$ 6,083$ 6,083$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 6 2031 12,653$ 12,653$ 12,653$ 18,775,647$ 18,775,647$ 18,775,647$ 14,081,735$ 6,327$ 6,327$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 7 2032 13,159$ 13,159$ 13,159$ 13,159$ 19,526,673$ 19,526,673$ 14,645,005$ 14,645,005$ 6,580$ 6,580$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 8 2033 13,686$ 13,686$ 13,686$ 13,686$ 13,686$ 20,307,740$ 15,230,805$ 15,230,805$ 15,230,805$ 6,843$ 6,843$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 9 2034 14,233$ 14,233$ 14,233$ 14,233$ 14,233$ 14,233$ 15,840,037$ 15,840,037$ 15,840,037$ 15,840,037$ 7,117$ 7,117$ 1,247,960$ 10 2035 14,802$ 14,802$ 14,802$ 14,802$ 14,802$ 14,802$ 14,802$ 16,473,639$ 16,473,639$ 16,473,639$ 16,473,639$ 7,401$ 7,401$ 11 2036 15,395$ 15,395$ 15,395$ 15,395$ 15,395$ 15,395$ 15,395$ 15,395$ 17,132,584$ 17,132,584$ 17,132,584$ 17,132,584$ 7,697$ 12 2037 98,303$ 16,010$ 16,010$ 16,010$ 16,010$ 16,010$ 16,010$ 16,010$ 16,010$ 17,817,888$ 17,817,888$ 17,817,888$ 17,817,888$ 13 2038 102,236$ 102,236$ 16,651$ 16,651$ 16,651$ 16,651$ 16,651$ 16,651$ 16,651$ 16,651$ 18,530,603$ 18,530,603$ 18,530,603$ 14 2039 106,325$ 106,325$ 106,325$ 17,317$ 17,317$ 17,317$ 17,317$ 17,317$ 17,317$ 17,317$ 17,317$ 19,271,827$ 19,271,827$ 15 2040 110,578$ 110,578$ 110,578$ 110,578$ 18,009$ 18,009$ 18,009$ 18,009$ 18,009$ 18,009$ 18,009$ 18,009$ 20,042,700$ 16 2041 115,001$ 115,001$ 115,001$ 115,001$ 115,001$ 18,730$ 18,730$ 18,730$ 18,730$ 18,730$ 18,730$ 18,730$ 18,730$ 17 2042 312,054$ 119,601$ 119,601$ 119,601$ 119,601$ 119,601$ 19,479$ 19,479$ 19,479$ 19,479$ 19,479$ 19,479$ 19,479$ 18 2043 324,536$ 324,536$ 124,385$ 124,385$ 124,385$ 124,385$ 124,385$ 20,258$ 20,258$ 20,258$ 20,258$ 20,258$ 20,258$ 19 2044 337,517$ 337,517$ 337,517$ 129,361$ 129,361$ 129,361$ 129,361$ 129,361$ 21,068$ 21,068$ 21,068$ 21,068$ 21,068$ 20 2045 351,018$ 351,018$ 351,018$ 351,018$ 134,535$ 134,535$ 134,535$ 134,535$ 134,535$ 21,911$ 21,911$ 21,911$ 21,911$ 21 2046 365,059$ 365,059$ 365,059$ 365,059$ 365,059$ 139,916$ 139,916$ 139,916$ 139,916$ 139,916$ 22,788$ 22,788$ 22,788$ 22 2047 616,179$ 379,661$ 379,661$ 379,661$ 379,661$ 379,661$ 145,513$ 145,513$ 145,513$ 145,513$ 145,513$ 23,699$ 23,699$ 23 2048 640,826$ 640,826$ 394,847$ 394,847$ 394,847$ 394,847$ 394,847$ 151,334$ 151,334$ 151,334$ 151,334$ 151,334$ 24,647$ 24 2049 666,459$ 666,459$ 666,459$ 410,641$ 410,641$ 410,641$ 410,641$ 410,641$ 157,387$ 157,387$ 157,387$ 157,387$ 157,387$ 25 2050 693,117$ 693,117$ 693,117$ 693,117$ 427,067$ 427,067$ 427,067$ 427,067$ 427,067$ 163,682$ 163,682$ 163,682$ 163,682$ 26 2051 720,842$ 720,842$ 720,842$ 720,842$ 720,842$ 444,150$ 444,150$ 444,150$ 444,150$ 444,150$ 170,230$ 170,230$ 170,230$ 27 2052 1,073,766$ 749,676$ 749,676$ 749,676$ 749,676$ 749,676$ 461,916$ 461,916$ 461,916$ 461,916$ 461,916$ 177,039$ 177,039$ 28 2053 1,116,717$ 1,116,717$ 779,663$ 779,663$ 779,663$ 779,663$ 779,663$ 480,392$ 480,392$ 480,392$ 480,392$ 480,392$ 184,120$ 29 2054 1,161,386$ 1,161,386$ 1,161,386$ 810,849$ 810,849$ 810,849$ 810,849$ 810,849$ 499,608$ 499,608$ 499,608$ 499,608$ 499,608$ 30 2055 1,207,841$ 1,207,841$ 1,207,841$ 1,207,841$ 843,283$ 843,283$ 843,283$ 843,283$ 843,283$ 519,592$ 519,592$ 519,592$ 519,592$ 31 2056 1,256,155$ 1,256,155$ 1,256,155$ 1,256,155$ 1,256,155$ 877,015$ 877,015$ 877,015$ 877,015$ 877,015$ 540,376$ 540,376$ 540,376$ 32 2057 1,779,287$ 1,306,401$ 1,306,401$ 1,306,401$ 1,306,401$ 1,306,401$ 912,095$ 912,095$ 912,095$ 912,095$ 912,095$ 561,991$ 561,991$ 33 2058 1,850,459$ 1,850,459$ 1,358,657$ 1,358,657$ 1,358,657$ 1,358,657$ 1,358,657$ 948,579$ 948,579$ 948,579$ 948,579$ 948,579$ 584,471$ 34 2059 1,924,477$ 1,924,477$ 1,924,477$ 1,413,003$ 1,413,003$ 1,413,003$ 1,413,003$ 1,413,003$ 986,522$ 986,522$ 986,522$ 986,522$ 986,522$ 35 2060 2,001,456$ 2,001,456$ 2,001,456$ 2,001,456$ 1,469,524$ 1,469,524$ 1,469,524$ 1,469,524$ 1,469,524$ 1,025,983$ 1,025,983$ 1,025,983$ 1,025,983$ 36 2061 2,081,515$ 2,081,515$ 2,081,515$ 2,081,515$ 2,081,515$ 1,528,304$ 1,528,304$ 1,528,304$ 1,528,304$ 1,528,304$ 1,067,022$ 1,067,022$ 1,067,022$ 37 2062 3,218,993$ 2,164,775$ 2,164,775$ 2,164,775$ 2,164,775$ 2,164,775$ 1,589,437$ 1,589,437$ 1,589,437$ 1,589,437$ 1,589,437$ 1,109,703$ 1,109,703$ 38 2063 3,347,753$ 3,347,753$ 2,251,366$ 2,251,366$ 2,251,366$ 2,251,366$ 2,251,366$ 1,653,014$ 1,653,014$ 1,653,014$ 1,653,014$ 1,653,014$ 1,154,091$ 39 2064 3,481,663$ 3,481,663$ 3,481,663$ 2,341,421$ 2,341,421$ 2,341,421$ 2,341,421$ 2,341,421$ 1,719,135$ 1,719,135$ 1,719,135$ 1,719,135$ 1,719,135$ 40 2065 3,620,930$ 3,620,930$ 3,620,930$ 3,620,930$ 2,435,078$ 2,435,078$ 2,435,078$ 2,435,078$ 2,435,078$ 1,787,900$ 1,787,900$ 1,787,900$ 1,787,900$ 41 2066 3,765,767$ 3,765,767$ 3,765,767$ 3,765,767$ 3,765,767$ 2,532,481$ 2,532,481$ 2,532,481$ 2,532,481$ 2,532,481$ 1,859,416$ 1,859,416$ 1,859,416$ 42 2067 4,642,349$ 3,916,398$ 3,916,398$ 3,916,398$ 3,916,398$ 3,916,398$ 2,633,780$ 2,633,780$ 2,633,780$ 2,633,780$ 2,633,780$ 1,933,793$ 1,933,793$ 43 2068 4,828,043$ 4,828,043$ 4,073,054$ 4,073,054$ 4,073,054$ 4,073,054$ 4,073,054$ 2,739,131$ 2,739,131$ 2,739,131$ 2,739,131$ 2,739,131$ 2,011,144$ 44 2069 5,021,164$ 5,021,164$ 5,021,164$ 4,235,976$ 4,235,976$ 4,235,976$ 4,235,976$ 4,235,976$ 2,848,696$ 2,848,696$ 2,848,696$ 2,848,696$ 2,848,696$ 45 2070 5,222,011$ 5,222,011$ 5,222,011$ 5,222,011$ 4,405,415$ 4,405,415$ 4,405,415$ 4,405,415$ 4,405,415$ 2,962,644$ 2,962,644$ 2,962,644$ 2,962,644$ Year Cost by YearG-34Page 432 of 1126 Total Pier Costs (2025 - 2070) Based on Year that Pier is Replaced Total Costs: 1 2026 2 2027 3 2028 4 2029 5 2030 6 2031 7 2032 8 2033 9 2034 10 2035 11 2036 12 2037 13 2038 14 2039 15 2040 16 2041 17 2042 18 2043 19 2044 20 2045 21 2046 22 2047 23 2048 24 2049 25 2050 26 2051 27 2052 28 2053 29 2054 30 2055 31 2056 32 2057 33 2058 34 2059 35 2060 36 2061 37 2062 38 2063 39 2064 40 2065 41 2066 42 2067 43 2068 44 2069 45 2070 Year Cost by Year114,009,207$ 116,576,664$ 120,065,705$ 123,694,307$ 127,468,054$ 131,392,751$ 135,668,102$ 140,797,276$ 146,131,618$ 151,679,334$ 157,448,958$ 163,838,125$ 171,089,126$ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 7,697$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 8,005$ 8,005$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 18,530,603$ 8,325$ 8,325$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 19,271,827$ 19,271,827$ 8,658$ 8,658$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 20,042,700$ 20,042,700$ 20,042,700$ 9,005$ 9,005$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 20,844,408$ 20,844,408$ 20,844,408$ 20,844,408$ 9,365$ 9,365$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 19,479$ 21,678,185$ 21,678,185$ 21,678,185$ 21,678,185$ 9,740$ 9,740$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 20,258$ 20,258$ 22,545,312$ 22,545,312$ 22,545,312$ 22,545,312$ 10,129$ 10,129$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 21,068$ 21,068$ 21,068$ 23,447,124$ 23,447,124$ 23,447,124$ 23,447,124$ 10,534$ 10,534$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 21,911$ 21,911$ 21,911$ 21,911$ 24,385,009$ 24,385,009$ 24,385,009$ 24,385,009$ 10,956$ 10,956$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 22,788$ 22,788$ 22,788$ 22,788$ 22,788$ 25,360,410$ 25,360,410$ 25,360,410$ 25,360,410$ 11,394$ 11,394$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 23,699$ 23,699$ 23,699$ 23,699$ 23,699$ 23,699$ 26,374,826$ 26,374,826$ 26,374,826$ 26,374,826$ 11,850$ 11,850$ 3,138,720$ 24,647$ 24,647$ 24,647$ 24,647$ 24,647$ 24,647$ 24,647$ 27,429,819$ 27,429,819$ 27,429,819$ 27,429,819$ 12,324$ 12,324$ 25,633$ 25,633$ 25,633$ 25,633$ 25,633$ 25,633$ 25,633$ 25,633$ 28,527,012$ 28,527,012$ 28,527,012$ 28,527,012$ 12,817$ 163,682$ 26,658$ 26,658$ 26,658$ 26,658$ 26,658$ 26,658$ 26,658$ 26,658$ 29,668,093$ 29,668,093$ 29,668,093$ 29,668,093$ 170,230$ 170,230$ 27,725$ 27,725$ 27,725$ 27,725$ 27,725$ 27,725$ 27,725$ 27,725$ 30,854,816$ 30,854,816$ 30,854,816$ 177,039$ 177,039$ 177,039$ 28,834$ 28,834$ 28,834$ 28,834$ 28,834$ 28,834$ 28,834$ 28,834$ 32,089,009$ 32,089,009$ 184,120$ 184,120$ 184,120$ 184,120$ 29,987$ 29,987$ 29,987$ 29,987$ 29,987$ 29,987$ 29,987$ 29,987$ 33,372,569$ 191,485$ 191,485$ 191,485$ 191,485$ 191,485$ 31,187$ 31,187$ 31,187$ 31,187$ 31,187$ 31,187$ 31,187$ 31,187$ 519,592$ 199,145$ 199,145$ 199,145$ 199,145$ 199,145$ 32,434$ 32,434$ 32,434$ 32,434$ 32,434$ 32,434$ 32,434$ 540,376$ 540,376$ 207,110$ 207,110$ 207,110$ 207,110$ 207,110$ 33,731$ 33,731$ 33,731$ 33,731$ 33,731$ 33,731$ 561,991$ 561,991$ 561,991$ 215,395$ 215,395$ 215,395$ 215,395$ 215,395$ 35,081$ 35,081$ 35,081$ 35,081$ 35,081$ 584,471$ 584,471$ 584,471$ 584,471$ 224,011$ 224,011$ 224,011$ 224,011$ 224,011$ 36,484$ 36,484$ 36,484$ 36,484$ 607,849$ 607,849$ 607,849$ 607,849$ 607,849$ 232,971$ 232,971$ 232,971$ 232,971$ 232,971$ 37,943$ 37,943$ 37,943$ 1,025,983$ 632,163$ 632,163$ 632,163$ 632,163$ 632,163$ 242,290$ 242,290$ 242,290$ 242,290$ 242,290$ 39,461$ 39,461$ 1,067,022$ 1,067,022$ 657,450$ 657,450$ 657,450$ 657,450$ 657,450$ 251,981$ 251,981$ 251,981$ 251,981$ 251,981$ 41,039$ 1,109,703$ 1,109,703$ 1,109,703$ 683,748$ 683,748$ 683,748$ 683,748$ 683,748$ 262,061$ 262,061$ 262,061$ 262,061$ 262,061$ 1,154,091$ 1,154,091$ 1,154,091$ 1,154,091$ 711,098$ 711,098$ 711,098$ 711,098$ 711,098$ 272,543$ 272,543$ 272,543$ 272,543$ 1,200,255$ 1,200,255$ 1,200,255$ 1,200,255$ 1,200,255$ 739,542$ 739,542$ 739,542$ 739,542$ 739,542$ 283,445$ 283,445$ 283,445$ 1,787,900$ 1,248,265$ 1,248,265$ 1,248,265$ 1,248,265$ 1,248,265$ 769,124$ 769,124$ 769,124$ 769,124$ 769,124$ 294,783$ 294,783$ 1,859,416$ 1,859,416$ 1,298,196$ 1,298,196$ 1,298,196$ 1,298,196$ 1,298,196$ 799,888$ 799,888$ 799,888$ 799,888$ 799,888$ 306,574$ 1,933,793$ 1,933,793$ 1,933,793$ 1,350,124$ 1,350,124$ 1,350,124$ 1,350,124$ 1,350,124$ 831,884$ 831,884$ 831,884$ 831,884$ 831,884$ 2,011,144$ 2,011,144$ 2,011,144$ 2,011,144$ 1,404,129$ 1,404,129$ 1,404,129$ 1,404,129$ 1,404,129$ 865,159$ 865,159$ 865,159$ 865,159$ 2,091,590$ 2,091,590$ 2,091,590$ 2,091,590$ 2,091,590$ 1,460,294$ 1,460,294$ 1,460,294$ 1,460,294$ 1,460,294$ 899,766$ 899,766$ 899,766$ 2,962,644$ 2,175,254$ 2,175,254$ 2,175,254$ 2,175,254$ 2,175,254$ 1,518,706$ 1,518,706$ 1,518,706$ 1,518,706$ 1,518,706$ 935,756$ 935,756$ G-35Page 433 of 1126 Total Pier Costs (2025 - 2070) Based on Year that Pier is Replaced Total Costs: 1 2026 2 2027 3 2028 4 2029 5 2030 6 2031 7 2032 8 2033 9 2034 10 2035 11 2036 12 2037 13 2038 14 2039 15 2040 16 2041 17 2042 18 2043 19 2044 20 2045 21 2046 22 2047 23 2048 24 2049 25 2050 26 2051 27 2052 28 2053 29 2054 30 2055 31 2056 32 2057 33 2058 34 2059 35 2060 36 2061 37 2062 38 2063 39 2064 40 2065 41 2066 42 2067 43 2068 44 2069 45 2070 Year Cost by Year178,630,167$ 186,472,849$ 194,629,239$ 203,492,822$ 213,311,141$ 223,522,192$ 234,141,686$ 245,185,959$ 257,156,385$ 269,917,874$ 283,189,822$ 296,992,649$ 311,347,589$ 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 12,817$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 13,329$ 13,329$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 30,854,816$ 13,862$ 13,862$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 32,089,009$ 32,089,009$ 14,417$ 14,417$ 4,214,908$ 4,214,908$ 4,214,908$ 4,214,908$ 4,214,908$ 4,214,908$ 4,214,908$ 4,214,908$ 4,214,908$ 33,372,569$ 33,372,569$ 33,372,569$ 14,994$ 14,994$ 4,383,505$ 4,383,505$ 4,383,505$ 4,383,505$ 4,383,505$ 4,383,505$ 4,383,505$ 4,383,505$ 34,707,472$ 34,707,472$ 34,707,472$ 34,707,472$ 15,593$ 15,593$ 4,558,845$ 4,558,845$ 4,558,845$ 4,558,845$ 4,558,845$ 4,558,845$ 4,558,845$ 32,434$ 36,095,771$ 36,095,771$ 36,095,771$ 36,095,771$ 16,217$ 16,217$ 4,741,198$ 4,741,198$ 4,741,198$ 4,741,198$ 4,741,198$ 4,741,198$ 33,731$ 33,731$ 37,539,602$ 37,539,602$ 37,539,602$ 37,539,602$ 16,866$ 16,866$ 5,415,228$ 5,415,228$ 5,415,228$ 5,415,228$ 5,415,228$ 35,081$ 35,081$ 35,081$ 39,041,186$ 39,041,186$ 39,041,186$ 39,041,186$ 17,540$ 17,540$ 5,631,838$ 5,631,838$ 5,631,838$ 5,631,838$ 36,484$ 36,484$ 36,484$ 36,484$ 40,602,833$ 40,602,833$ 40,602,833$ 40,602,833$ 18,242$ 18,242$ 5,857,111$ 5,857,111$ 5,857,111$ 37,943$ 37,943$ 37,943$ 37,943$ 37,943$ 42,226,947$ 42,226,947$ 42,226,947$ 42,226,947$ 18,972$ 18,972$ 6,091,395$ 6,091,395$ 39,461$ 39,461$ 39,461$ 39,461$ 39,461$ 39,461$ 43,916,024$ 43,916,024$ 43,916,024$ 43,916,024$ 19,730$ 19,730$ 6,335,051$ 41,039$ 41,039$ 41,039$ 41,039$ 41,039$ 41,039$ 41,039$ 45,672,665$ 45,672,665$ 45,672,665$ 45,672,665$ 20,520$ 20,520$ 42,681$ 42,681$ 42,681$ 42,681$ 42,681$ 42,681$ 42,681$ 42,681$ 47,499,572$ 47,499,572$ 47,499,572$ 47,499,572$ 21,340$ 272,543$ 44,388$ 44,388$ 44,388$ 44,388$ 44,388$ 44,388$ 44,388$ 44,388$ 49,399,555$ 49,399,555$ 49,399,555$ 49,399,555$ 283,445$ 283,445$ 46,164$ 46,164$ 46,164$ 46,164$ 46,164$ 46,164$ 46,164$ 46,164$ 51,375,537$ 51,375,537$ 51,375,537$ 294,783$ 294,783$ 294,783$ 48,010$ 48,010$ 48,010$ 48,010$ 48,010$ 48,010$ 48,010$ 48,010$ 53,430,559$ 53,430,559$ 306,574$ 306,574$ 306,574$ 306,574$ 49,931$ 49,931$ 49,931$ 49,931$ 49,931$ 49,931$ 49,931$ 49,931$ 55,567,781$ 318,837$ 318,837$ 318,837$ 318,837$ 318,837$ 51,928$ 51,928$ 51,928$ 51,928$ 51,928$ 51,928$ 51,928$ 51,928$ 865,159$ 331,590$ 331,590$ 331,590$ 331,590$ 331,590$ 54,005$ 54,005$ 54,005$ 54,005$ 54,005$ 54,005$ 54,005$ 899,766$ 899,766$ 344,854$ 344,854$ 344,854$ 344,854$ 344,854$ 56,165$ 56,165$ 56,165$ 56,165$ 56,165$ 56,165$ 935,756$ 935,756$ 935,756$ 358,648$ 358,648$ 358,648$ 358,648$ 358,648$ 58,412$ 58,412$ 58,412$ 58,412$ 58,412$ G-36Page 434 of 1126 Total Costs: 1 2026 2 2027 3 2028 4 2029 5 2030 6 2031 7 2032 8 2033 9 2034 10 2035 11 2036 12 2037 13 2038 14 2039 15 2040 16 2041 17 2042 18 2043 19 2044 20 2045 21 2046 22 2047 23 2048 24 2049 25 2050 26 2051 27 2052 28 2053 29 2054 30 2055 31 2056 32 2057 33 2058 34 2059 35 2060 36 2061 37 2062 38 2063 39 2064 40 2065 41 2066 42 2067 43 2068 44 2069 45 2070 Year Cost by Year327,127,060$ 343,537,711$ 360,604,788$ 378,354,548$ 394,274,789$ 408,207,042$ 40 41 42 43 44 45 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,687,920$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,755,437$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,206,979$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,255,258$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,305,469$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,109,432$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,153,809$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,199,961$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,247,960$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,297,878$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,617,043$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,681,724$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,748,993$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,818,953$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 1,891,711$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,161,046$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,247,488$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,337,387$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,430,883$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 2,528,118$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,018,000$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,138,720$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,264,269$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,394,840$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 3,530,634$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 4,052,796$ 4,214,908$ 4,214,908$ 4,214,908$ 4,214,908$ 4,214,908$ 4,214,908$ 4,383,505$ 4,383,505$ 4,383,505$ 4,383,505$ 4,383,505$ 4,383,505$ 4,558,845$ 4,558,845$ 4,558,845$ 4,558,845$ 4,558,845$ 4,558,845$ 4,741,198$ 4,741,198$ 4,741,198$ 4,741,198$ 4,741,198$ 4,741,198$ 5,415,228$ 5,415,228$ 5,415,228$ 5,415,228$ 5,415,228$ 5,415,228$ 5,631,838$ 5,631,838$ 5,631,838$ 5,631,838$ 5,631,838$ 5,631,838$ 5,857,111$ 5,857,111$ 5,857,111$ 5,857,111$ 5,857,111$ 5,857,111$ 6,091,395$ 6,091,395$ 6,091,395$ 6,091,395$ 6,091,395$ 6,091,395$ 6,335,051$ 6,335,051$ 6,335,051$ 6,335,051$ 6,335,051$ 6,335,051$ 7,438,788$ 7,438,788$ 7,438,788$ 7,438,788$ 7,438,788$ 7,438,788$ 21,340$ 7,736,340$ 7,736,340$ 7,736,340$ 7,736,340$ 7,736,340$ 22,194$ 22,194$ 8,045,793$ 8,045,793$ 8,045,793$ 8,045,793$ 51,375,537$ 23,082$ 23,082$ 8,367,625$ 8,367,625$ 8,367,625$ 53,430,559$ 53,430,559$ 24,005$ 24,005$ 8,702,330$ 8,702,330$ 55,567,781$ 55,567,781$ 55,567,781$ 24,965$ 24,965$ 9,859,299$ 57,790,492$ 57,790,492$ 57,790,492$ 57,790,492$ 25,964$ 25,964$ 54,005$ 60,102,112$ 60,102,112$ 60,102,112$ 60,102,112$ 27,002$ 56,165$ 56,165$ 62,506,196$ 62,506,196$ 62,506,196$ 83,341,595$ 58,412$ 58,412$ 58,412$ 65,006,444$ 130,012,888$ 173,350,518$ Total Pier Costs (2025 - 2070) Based on Year that Pier is Replaced G-37Page 435 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier September 5, 2025 Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report info@sensequake.com www.jmc-2.com/contact-us Page 436 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report i Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report Hermosa Beach Pier Prepared and approved by: Vipul Ahuja, SE. ____________________ SE No: Farshad Mirshafiei, Ph.D., P.Eng. ____________________ No P.E.O.: 100533861 Nathan Cao, MASc. __________________ Alexandre Darche, CEP. ____________________ No O.I.Q.: 6027466 S2908 Page 437 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report ii Table of contents I. Property and Confidentiality viii II. Executive Summary ix III. Mandate xiv IV. Conditions and Restrictions xvi 1 Overview of Sensequake Technology 1 1.1 Sensing and Ambient Vibration Tests 1 1.2 Sensequake’s 3D-SAMTM Technology 2 2 Sensing Test 5 2.1 Sensing Test Summary 5 3 Ambient Vibration Testing – An Overview 7 4 Structural Health Monitoring 14 4.1 Structural Identification 14 4.2 Description of the Test 16 4.3 Dynamic Property Results (Stiffness Baselines) 18 4.3.1 Results of the Test - Bay 10-11 ......................................................................................................... 19 4.3.2 Results of the Test - Bay 12-13 ......................................................................................................... 22 4.3.3 Results of the Test - Bay 13-14 ......................................................................................................... 25 4.3.4 Results of the Test - Bay 15-16 ......................................................................................................... 28 4.3.5 Results of the Test - Bay 18-19 ......................................................................................................... 31 4.3.6 Results of the Test - Bay 21-22 ......................................................................................................... 34 4.3.7 Results of the Test - Bay 27-28 ......................................................................................................... 37 4.3.8 Results of the Test - Bay 30-31 ......................................................................................................... 40 4.3.9 Results of the Test - Bay 32-33 ......................................................................................................... 43 4.3.10 Results of the Test - Bay 35-36 ......................................................................................................... 46 5 Discussions: Integrity Evaluation 49 5.1 Mode Shape Evaluation – Bay 10-11 54 5.2 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 12-13 57 5.3 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 13-14 60 5.4 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 15-16 63 5.5 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 18-19 67 5.6 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 21-22 70 5.7 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 27-28 75 5.8 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 30-31 80 5.9 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 32-33 84 5.10 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 35-36 88 5.11 Frequency Comparison and Discussion 93 6 Conclusion 95 7 References 97 Appendix A – Sensor Layout 98 Page 438 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report iii List of Figures Figure II-1 Combined Heat Maps for bay 10-11 ......................................................................................................... x Figure II-2 Combined Heat Maps for bay 12-13 ......................................................................................................... x Figure II-3 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 13-14 ........................................................................................................ xi Figure II-4 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 15-16 ........................................................................................................ xi Figure II-5 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 18-19 ........................................................................................................ xi Figure II-6 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 21-22 ....................................................................................................... xii Figure II-7 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 27-28 ....................................................................................................... xii Figure II-8 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 30-31 ....................................................................................................... xii Figure II-9 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 32-33 ...................................................................................................... xiii Figure II-10 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 35-36 .................................................................................................... xiii Figure 1-1: The wireless Sensequake Larzé sensors used for ambient vibration testing ..........................................1 Figure 1-2: The 3D-SAMTM methodology ...................................................................................................................3 Figure 1-3: Steps of Sensequake’s baseline integrity evaluations for structures .......................................................4 Figure 2-1: (a) Sensequake Larzé sensor; (b) Sensequake Larzé sensor and control application ...........................5 Figure 3-1: Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) process ............................................................................................7 Figure 3-2: Mathematical analysis techniques for OMA. ............................................................................................8 Figure 3-3: Brief overview of Frequency Domain Decomposition; a) Power Spectral Density matrix formulation followed by its Singular Value Decomposition; b) Definition of modal behavior of structure in terms of its frequency, mode shape and damping; c) Correlation of the modal response with the Singular Value Decomposition ....................................................................................................................................................8 Figure 3-4: Raw output of Sensor #1, Hermosa Beach Pier ......................................................................................9 Figure 3-5: Spectrogram of measured velocity of Sensor #1, Hermosa Beach Pier .............................................. 10 Figure 3-6: Power spectral density of Sensor #1, Hermosa Beach Pier ................................................................. 11 Figure 4-1: Hermosa Beach Pier (Google Maps) .................................................................................................... 14 Figure 4-2 Structural numbering of the Hermosa Beach Pier ................................................................................. 15 Figure 4-3: Testing of the Hermosa Beach Pier ...................................................................................................... 16 Figure 4-4: 3D Model of the Hermosa Beach Pier with sensor locations ................................................................ 17 Figure 4-5: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 10-11, Hermosa Beach Pier ...... 19 Figure 4-6: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 12-13, Hermosa Beach Pier ...... 22 Figure 4-7: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 13-14, Hermosa Beach Pier ...... 25 Figure 4-8: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 15-16, Hermosa Beach Pier ...... 28 Figure 4-9: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 18-19, Hermosa Beach Pier ...... 31 Figure 4-10: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 21-22, Hermosa Beach Pier .... 34 Figure 4-11: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 27-28, Hermosa Beach Pier .... 37 Figure 4-12: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 30-31, Hermosa Beach Pier .... 40 Figure 4-13: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 32-33, Hermosa Beach Pier .... 43 Page 439 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report iv Figure 4-14: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 35-36, Hermosa Beach Pier .... 46 Figure 5-1 Effect of localized curvature change on pier mode shapes (Transverse mode) .................................... 50 Figure 5-2 Example calculation for the curvature .................................................................................................... 51 Figure 5-3 Curvature categorization and color coding ............................................................................................ 52 Figure 5-4 Example of Excessive Vertical Flexibility ............................................................................................... 53 Figure 5-5: Structural condition based on quantified vertical curvature change ..................................................... 54 Figure 5-6: Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 10-11 ........................................................................................ 54 Figure 5-7 Vertical Heat map for Bay 10-11 ............................................................................................................ 56 Figure 5-8 Combined heat maps comparison for Bay 10-11................................................................................... 57 Figure 5-9 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 12-13 ......................................................................................... 57 Figure 5-10 Vertical displacement on Bay 12-13 Panel C....................................................................................... 58 Figure 5-11 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 12-13 .......................................................................................................... 59 Figure 5-12 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 12-13 .................................................................................................... 60 Figure 5-13 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 13-14 ....................................................................................... 60 Figure 5-14 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 13-14 .......................................................................................................... 62 Figure 5-15 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 13-14 .................................................................................................... 63 Figure 5-16 Delamination on Panel B of Bay 13-14 ................................................................................................ 63 Figure 5-17 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 15-16 ....................................................................................... 64 Figure 5-18 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 15-16 .......................................................................................................... 65 Figure 5-19 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 15-16 .................................................................................................... 66 Figure 5-20 Panel B with large spalling area for Bay 15-16 .................................................................................... 66 Figure 5-21 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 18-19 ....................................................................................... 67 Figure 5-22 Unexpected transverse movement on shear key C-D Bay 18-19........................................................ 69 Figure 5-23 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 18-19 .......................................................................................................... 69 Figure 5-24 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 18-19 .................................................................................................... 70 Figure 5-25 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 21-22 ....................................................................................... 70 Figure 5-26 Unexpected Longitudinal Flexibility on the bents ................................................................................. 72 Figure 5-27: Bent 21 Unexpected Longitudinal Flexibility (Front view) ................................................................... 73 Figure 5-28 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 21-22 .......................................................................................................... 74 Figure 5-29 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 21-22 .................................................................................................... 74 Figure 5-30 Panel B large cracking and spalling area Bay 21-22 ........................................................................... 75 Figure 5-31 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 27-28 ....................................................................................... 75 Figure 5-32 Side view and Front View of 1st Vertical Mode of Bay 27-28 .............................................................. 77 Figure 5-33 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 27-28 .......................................................................................................... 78 Figure 5-34 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 27-28 .................................................................................................... 79 Figure 5-35 Large cracks have been observed on Panel A Bay 27-28 ................................................................... 79 Figure 5-36 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 30-31 ....................................................................................... 80 Page 440 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report v Figure 5-37 Side view and Front View of 1st Vertical Mode of Bay 30-31 .............................................................. 82 Figure 5-38 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 30-31 .......................................................................................................... 82 Figure 5-39 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 30-31 .................................................................................................... 83 Figure 5-40 Panel C large cracks and spalling, Bay 30-31 ..................................................................................... 83 Figure 5-41 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 32-33 ....................................................................................... 84 Figure 5-42 Side view and Front View of 1st Vertical Mode of Bay 32-33 .............................................................. 86 Figure 5-43 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 32-33 .......................................................................................................... 87 Figure 5-44 Large cracking along the shear key B-C on Panel C, Bay 32-33 ........................................................ 87 Figure 5-45 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 32-33 .................................................................................................... 88 Figure 5-46 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 35-36 ....................................................................................... 89 Figure 5-47 Large opening area on Panel A and B, Bay 35-36 .............................................................................. 90 Figure 5-48: Side view and Front View of 1st Vertical Mode of Bay 35-36 .............................................................. 91 Figure 5-49 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 35-36 .......................................................................................................... 92 Figure 5-50 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 35-36 .................................................................................................... 93 Figure A-1 Sensor Layouts for typical bays ............................................................................................................. 98 Figure A-2 Sensor Layout for Bay 35-36 ................................................................................................................. 99 Page 441 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report vi List of Tables Table 4-1: Modal Properties for Bay 10-11, Hermosa Beach Pier .......................................................................... 19 Table 4-2: Mode 1, Bay 10-11, Hermosa Beach Pier .............................................................................................. 20 Table 4-3: Mode 2, Bay 10-11, Hermosa Beach Pier .............................................................................................. 21 Table 4-4: Modal Properties for Bay 12-13, Hermosa Beach Pier .......................................................................... 22 Table 4-5: Mode 1, Bay 12-13, Hermosa Beach Pier .............................................................................................. 23 Table 4-6: Mode 2, Bay 12-13, Hermosa Beach Pier .............................................................................................. 24 Table 4-7: Modal Properties for Bay 13-14, Hermosa Beach Pier .......................................................................... 25 Table 4-8: Mode 1, Bay 13-14, Hermosa Beach Pier .............................................................................................. 26 Table 4-9: Mode 2, Bay 13-14, Hermosa Beach Pier .............................................................................................. 27 Table 4-10: Modal Properties for Bay 15-16, Hermosa Beach Pier ........................................................................ 28 Table 4-11: Mode 1, Bay 15-16, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 29 Table 4-12: Mode 2, Bay 15-16, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 30 Table 4-13: Modal Properties for Bay 18-19, Hermosa Beach Pier ........................................................................ 31 Table 4-14: Mode 1, Bay 18-19, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 32 Table 4-15: Mode 2, Bay 18-19, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 33 Table 4-16: Modal Properties for Bay 21-22, Hermosa Beach Pier ........................................................................ 34 Table 4-17: Mode 1, Bay 21-22, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 35 Table 4-18: Mode 2, Bay 21-22, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 36 Table 4-19: Modal Properties for Bay 27-28, Hermosa Beach Pier ........................................................................ 37 Table 4-20: Mode 1, Bay 27-28, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 38 Table 4-21: Mode 2, Bay 27-28, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 39 Table 4-22: Modal Properties for Bay 30-31, Hermosa Beach Pier ........................................................................ 40 Table 4-23: Mode 1, Bay 30-31, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 41 Table 4-24: Mode 2, Bay 30-31, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 42 Table 4-25: Modal Properties for Bay 32-33, Hermosa Beach Pier ........................................................................ 43 Table 4-26: Mode 1, Bay 32-33, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 44 Table 4-27: Mode 2, Bay 32-33, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 45 Table 4-28: Modal Properties for Bay 35-36, Hermosa Beach Pier ........................................................................ 46 Table 4-29: Mode 1, Bay 35-36, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 47 Table 4-30: Mode 2, Bay 35-36, Hermosa Beach Pier ............................................................................................ 48 Table 5-1 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 10-11 .................................................... 55 Table 5-2 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 10-11 ............................................... 55 Table 5-3 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 12-13 .................................................... 58 Table 5-4 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 12-13 ............................................... 59 Table 5-5 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 13-14 .................................................... 61 Table 5-6 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 13-14 ............................................... 62 Page 442 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report vii Table 5-7 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 15-16 .................................................... 64 Table 5-8 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 15-16 ............................................... 65 Table 5-9 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 18-19 .................................................... 68 Table 5-10 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 18-19 ............................................. 68 Table 5-11 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 21-22 .................................................. 71 Table 5-12 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 21-22 ............................................. 71 Table 5-13 In-plane Frequency Comparison Bay 21-22 ......................................................................................... 72 Table 5-14 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 27-28 .................................................. 76 Table 5-15 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 27-28 ............................................. 77 Table 5-16 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 30-31 .................................................. 81 Table 5-17 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 30-31 ............................................. 81 Table 5-18 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 32-33 .................................................. 85 Table 5-19 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 32-33 ............................................. 85 Table 5-20 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 35-36 .................................................. 91 Table 5-21 Frequency Comparison for all the tested bays ...................................................................................... 93 Page 443 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report viii I. Property and Confidentiality T h i s r epo r t i s i n t ende d f o r t h e pur p o s e s d e scr i b e d w i t h i n . U s e , r e p r odu c t ion , o r adaptation by the Client for official City business, including public disclosure as required by the California Public Records Act, is permitted. All other rights reserved by Sensequake. Page 444 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report ix II. Executive Summary This report presents the results of the sensing-based integrity evaluation test of the Hermosa Beach Pier using Sensequake's proprietary sensing-based structural health monitoring to evaluate its structural integrity. The Hermosa Beach Pier is made up of 36 bays, 10 are selected to be evaluated as part of this study. The majority of the bays are constructed by four prestressed concrete panels linked by shear keys and supported by two bents, 30.5 feet in length and 20 feet wide for the span. The end bay, Bay 35-36 has 10 concrete panels linked by shear keys. The existing pier was constructed in 1965. The following bays were selected to be tested as part of the evaluation: Bay 10-11 Bay 12-13 Bay 13-14 Bay 15-16 Bay 18-19 Bay 21-22 Bay 27-28 Bay 30-31 Bay 32-33 Bay 35-36 These bays were prioritized based on visual inspection results, which highlighted advanced deterioration such as surface cracking, spalling, and suspected internal degradation. The data collected was then analyzed in detail with a simplified 3D model of the Pier bays created in Sensequake’s 3D-SAMTM software. The analysis is done without detailed structural drawings and is solely based on the measured ambient vibrations. The following is achieved using the measured data: • Multiple 3D mode shapes and natural frequencies (dynamic properties or stiffness baselines); • Multiple structural integrity baselines for the individual bays of the Pier; • Page 445 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report x The evaluation reveals that all tested bays exhibited varying levels of deterioration, with notable damage concentrated in specific panels and structural regions. A combination of transverse mode, vertical mode, and resonance frequency comparisons are used in combination to provide the following heat maps for each tested bay. Figure II-1: Combined Heat Maps for bay 10-11 Figure II-2: Combined Heat Maps for bay 12-13 Page 446 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report xi Figure II-3: Combined Heat Maps for Bay 13-14 Figure II-4: Combined Heat Maps for Bay 15-16 Figure II-5: Combined Heat Maps for Bay 18-19 Page 447 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report xii Figure II-6: Combined Heat Maps for Bay 21-22 Figure II-7: Combined Heat Maps for Bay 27-28 Figure II-8: Combined Heat Maps for Bay 30-31 Page 448 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report xiii Figure II-9: Combined Heat Maps for Bay 32-33 Figure II-10: Combined Heat Maps for Bay 35-36 In summary, the combination of dynamic testing, curvature quantification, vertical flexibility analysis, and visual inspection provides a detailed and reliable assessment of the Hermosa Beach Pier's structural condition. The findings confirm that multiple spans are experiencing progressive deterioration, with several regions requiring immediate attention or further investigation. Future repetition of this same test can be used for long-term structural health management and support the development of targeted maintenance and retrofit strateg ies to extend the Pier’s service life. Page 449 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report xiv III. Mandate Sensequake’s mandate for this project is to perform an ambient vibration-based integrity evaluation of certain bays of the Hermosa Beach Pier. Sensequake’s mandate is defined as follows: • Review available plans for the structures and inspection reports . • Design the sensing test of the pier including the location of the sensors, data sampling frequency, test duration, and execution plans. • Gather ambient vibration data from the pier using sensors with six channels of data (acceleration and velocities in XYZ). • Perform a few weeks of in-depth post-processing of the vibration data gathered to: o o o o o Page 450 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report xv o o o Page 451 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report xvi IV. Conditions and Restrictions In this section, the “Client” is defined as the City of Hermosa Beach. We draw the reader’s attention to the fact that this report does not constitute a legal opinion. The principles, procedures, and standards applied to the execution of intellectual services, including the characterization of the Hermosa Beach Pier, were carried out by recognized and compliant procedures in the art. It is imperative to note that the methods used in the characteri zation and assessment of the work, although aimed at minimizing unidentified risks and problems, cannot guarantee their absence. The analysis is based on the information on the pier received by Sensequake and the sensing tests. In case of missing information, reasonable assumptions were made. Data, information, analytical processing, comments, views, and opinions presented in this report are intended exclusively for the Client in relation to the pier. To this end, Sensequake explicitly and exclusively recognizes its professional responsibilities towards its Client and accepts no responsibility regarding the relevance and validity of the report to third parties other than its Client. After these conditions and restrictions, Sensequake states that this report must be read in its entirety since sections taken out of context can be misleading and result in deductions and/or wrong conclusions. The modal identification algorithms of 3D-SAMTM are in accordance with state-of-the-art ambient vibration sensing technologies. Readers of the report should be aware of the limitations of this technique which can be found in existing literature (Brincker and Ventura 2015). The evaluation of structural performance is based on the analysis of structural stiffness properties, including measured frequencies, mode shapes and damping ratios. These do not entirely guarantee that all damage or failure mechanisms will be identified. Sensequake removes itself from any direct or indirect damages that could be caused due to the limitations of this approach. Page 452 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 1 1 Overview of Sensequake Technology 1.1 Sensing and Ambient Vibration Tests Comprehensive ambient vibration sensing tests were designed and performed on select bays of the Hermosa Beach Pier so that their dynamic characteristics (natural frequencies, mode shapes, and damping ratios) could be derived. The competence of ambient vibration testing to derive modal properties such as the natural frequencies, mode shapes and estimates of internal equivalent modal damping ratios has been demonstrated in many studies over the past decades. Sensequake’s high-resolution wireless sensors are capable of measuring the minuscule ambient accelerations and velocities of structures (Figure 1-1). Figure 1-1: The wireless Sensequake Larzé sensors used for ambient vibration testing Page 453 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 2 Unlike forced vibration tests, the forces detected in the structure during ambient vibration tests are not controlled. The structure is assumed to be excited by wind, traffic, micro-tremors, and human activities. The measurements (velocities and accelerations) are recorded for several minutes during the regular operating conditions of the structure to ensure that all the m odes of interest are sufficiently excited. In the modal identification of output-only systems, the input loads are unknown, and the modal identification has to be carried out solely based on the output responses. Although the displacements detected in both ambient and forced vibration tests are very small, vibrator-induced motions may be several orders of magnitude greater than the ambient vibrations. It has been shown, however, that forced and ambient tests lead to a consistent agreement for modal parameters in structures. Today, ambient vibration tests are the most advanced, efficient, and reliable sensing method for capturing modal properties as well as understanding the behaviour and integrity of existing structures (Trifunac 1972; Lamarche et al. 2008; Hans et al. 2005). 1.2 Sensequake’s 3D-SAMTM Technology Page 454 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 3 TM Page 455 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 4 Page 456 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 5 2 Sensing Test 2.1 Sensing Test Summary Comprehensive ambient vibration sensing tests are designed and performed on the structure to derive its main characteristics (natural frequencies, mode shapes, and damping ratios). For the current test, 10 Sensequake Larzé wireless sensors were used to measure the horizontal and vertical vibrations in the pier. In addition to high-quality data collected by the sensors, one of the main features of the Larzé system is the automated synchronization achieved through a wireless mesh network. The sensors need to be within the reach of the radios for a few seconds for synchronization and then moved to their designated locations (Figure 2-1 (a)). The sensors maintain synchronization for more than 12 hours. Figure 2-1: (a) Sensequake Larzé sensor; (b) Sensequake Larzé sensor and control application Page 457 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 6 The following are the specifications of the Sensequake Larzé sensors. The sampling frequencies can be selected based on the type of structure. The sensor’s analog - to-digital converters operate at much higher sampling rates and further decimate the data to achieve higher signal-to-noise ratios. Page 458 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 7 3 Ambient Vibration Testing – An Overview Modal identification of structures by evaluating their ambient vibration response through mathematical procedures has been performed since the early 1930s with major advances in Operation Modal Analysis (OMA) techniques occurring in the early 1990s. The process of OMA (Figure 3-1) involves utilizing time and frequency domain analysis techniques to isolate the response of the structure in terms of its dynamic characteristics (frequencies and mode shapes) from the measured response due to the “ambient” of excitation such as traffic, wind, etc. Figure 3-1: Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) process Among the available mathematical methods (Figure 3-2) to process the measured response of a structure to ambient excitation is Frequency Domain Decomposition (commonly referred to as FDD). This is comparatively faster as it involves frequency d omain analysis (peak-picking method). Time domain analysis techniques such as Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition (EFDD) and Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI) are more robust as they involve performing parametric analysis of the measured responses of the structure. Page 459 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 8 Figure 3-2: Mathematical analysis techniques for OMA. The overview of FDD of the measured responses of the system by generating the Power Spectral Density (PSD) matrix utilizing their Fourier transformation is shown in Figure 3-3. Figure 3-3: Brief overview of Frequency Domain Decomposition; a) Power Spectral Density matrix formulation followed by its Singular Value Decomposition; b) Definition of modal behavior of structure in terms of its frequency, mode shape and damping; c) Correlation of the modal response with the Singular Value Decomposition Page 460 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 9 The frequency-domain decomposition (FDD) technique is based on the singular value decomposition (SVD) of the power spectral density (PSD) matrix shown in Figure 3-3 (a). It then correlates the expected output (the measured response of the system in terms of its normal modes and modal coordinates) Figure 3-3 (b), with the singular values and their corresponding single vectors. Sensequake utilizes SSI to determine the dynamic characteristics of a structure which is explained in detail in this section. One of the data files from the test of the Hermosa Beach Pier and its results are used in this section as an example to better clarify the identification process. The raw output of the reference sensor (sensor 1) in the Z-direction is plotted as a function of time (Figure 3-4). The challenge is to extract the dynamic information of the structure (i.e., its modal properties) from these kinds of recordings. Figure 3-4: Raw output of Sensor #1, Hermosa Beach Pier Page 461 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 10 The spectrogram of the same signal is shown in Figure 3-5, representing the frequency content of the signal as a function of time. The figure shows some strong horizontal lines around certain specific values; for example, between 10.0 to 12.0 Hz. These values are therefore present throughout the entirety of the recording and are related to the natural frequencies found through the test. Figure 3-5: Spectrogram of measured velocity of Sensor #1, Hermosa Beach Pier Figure 3-6 shows the power spectral density of the same signal, and also shows clear peaks around the same values, corresponding to the first vertical modal frequency of the structure. Even though ambient vibrations due to loading such as wind and micro tremors are of low amplitude, the modal properties of the pier are embedded in the signals. These modal properties can be extracted using advanced mathematical algorithms. Appropriate pre-processing such as applying bandpass filters and decimation of the signals is required for extraction. Page 462 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 11 Figure 3-6: Power spectral density of Sensor #1, Hermosa Beach Pier An important step in deriving the modal properties is calculating the singular values of all signals of each setup. The natural frequencies can be read on the singula r value decomposition (SVD) of the matrices of spectral density Gxy defined by (Brincker and Ventura 2015): 𝐺𝑥𝑥(𝜔)=1 2𝜋∫𝑅𝑥𝑥(𝜍)𝑑−𝑖𝜔𝑡∞ −∞𝑑𝜍 (1) This is also the Fourier transform of cross-correlation matrices and is defined for measurement signals x and y by: 𝑅𝑥𝑥(𝜍)=𝐸[𝑥(𝑠)𝑥𝑇(𝑠+𝜍)] (2) Page 463 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 12 The underlying principle is that every structure (imperceptibly) oscillates according to its eigenmodes under the loading of ambient vibrations and these oscillations appear as peaks in the cross-correlations. The Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI) algorithm is used to identify natural frequencies, damping ratios, and mode shapes. Since the range of frequencies is known, a bandpass filter is applied and the signals have been decimated to increase the signal -to-noise ratio and reduce the computation time of the algorithm. SSI algorithms, initially introduced in Van Overschee and De Moor (1996), provide the modal properties which optimally match the measurements, for a chosen number of oscillators, N. The measured time series y1, y2, …, yn, are gathered in a vector Y and the following matrix is computed: 𝐺=[ 𝑌(1)⋯𝑌(𝑞+1) 𝑌(2)⋯𝑌(𝑞+2) ⋮⋱⋮ 𝑌(2𝑠)⋯𝑌(2𝑠+𝑞) ] (3) Where Y(k) corresponds to the kth measurement point and s and q are parameters chosen by the user. This matrix has the structure of a Hankel matrix, reducing computation costs. The principle of the method is to split the first s rows of H, denoted by H1 and assumed to be given, and use it the predict the s last rows of H2, assumed to be stochastic. Modal properties are then deduced from the fact that H2 is known from the measurements. Concretely, the observation matrix O is defined and computed using: 𝑂=𝐺2 𝐺1 𝑇(𝐺1 𝐺1 𝑇)+𝐺1 (4) Where the superscript + stands for the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse. The singular value decomposition of O is performed: 𝑂=𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑇 (5) from which the following matrix is computed: Page 464 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 13 𝐴=𝑅𝑁𝑅𝑁 1/2 (6) The index N stands for the truncation order, or modal order, corresponding to the number of oscillators considered for the estimation of the dynamic properties. The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A are used to estimate the modal properties. The actual structural properties can be identified by investigating their sensitivity to N: they are the ones, which remain stable, and independent of N. The other ones are artifacts, mostly related to measurement noise. After calculation of system matrix Ad and found observation matrix C, the modal properties can be extracted. The first step is to perform an eigenvalue decomposition of the system matrix Ad as follows: 𝐴̂𝑑=Ψ[𝜆𝑖]Ψ−1 (7) The continuous time poles are found from the discrete -time poles µi by the following: 𝜆𝑖=exp(𝜆𝑖) (8) Leading to the well-known formulas: 𝜆𝑖=ln(𝜆𝑖) Δ𝑅 𝜔𝑖=|𝜆𝑖| 𝑑𝑖=𝜔𝑖 2π 𝜏𝑖=𝑅𝑑(𝜆𝑖) |𝜆𝑖| (9) The mode shape matrix can be found from the following formula: Φ =𝐶Ψ (10) Page 465 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 14 4 Structural Health Monitoring 4.1 Structural Identification Two phases of testing were completed on different bays of the Hermosa Beach Pier (Figure 4- 1). A total of 10 bays were selected between the phases in consultation with the project stakeholders. These bays were chosen due to their elevated visual deterioration, cracking, and spalling noted in inspection reports and confirmed through preliminary structural screening. Additionally, these bays accounted for the panels that were targeted for future repairs/replacement due to their condition. Figure 4-1: Hermosa Beach Pier (Google Maps) The Hermosa Beach Pier has 36 Bents. The panels, bays and bents are named as illustrated in Figure 4-2 from East to West. This naming scheme is consistently followed throughout the report. The ten bays selected for testing include Bays 10–11, 12–13, 13–14, 15–16, 18–19, 21–22, 27– 28, 30–31, 32–33, and 35–36. These bays were prioritized based on visual inspection results, which highlighted advanced deterioration such as surface cracking, spalling, and suspected internal degradation. Ambient vibration tests were employed to identify modal properties (natural frequencies, damping ratios, mode shapes) across the selected bays. The testing layout and methodology were adapted to the specific geometry and structural configurations of the bays. Page 466 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 15 Figure 4-2 Structural numbering of the Hermosa Beach Pier Nine of the tested bays (specifically Bays 10–11 through 32–33) share the same superstructure design. Each consists of four prestressed concrete panels interconnected by shear keys and supported by two bents. These spans measure approximately 30.5 feet in length and 20 feet in width. This structural configuration has b een consistent across a significant portion of the Hermosa Beach Pier and provided a basis for comparative analysis of modal characteristics observed across the tests. Bay 35–36 differs from the others in that it comprises ten panels rather than four. This variation in panel count results in a wider span, which may influence both the stiffness distribution and modal behavior. Consequently, special attention was given to Bay 35–36 during both test design and analysis. In all cases, the tests were conducted using the same methodology, ensuring consistency in baseline extraction. Sensor placement was carefully designed to capture the dynamic response of each bay, with attention to coverage across all panels and shear keys, especially in regions where visual inspections had noted signs of distress. Page 467 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 16 4.2 Description of the Test The testing of the Pier was done in two phases: the first was completed on November 17, 2024, at an average temperature of 64oF. Phase 2 was conducted over four consecutive days in mid- March, 2025, under average on-site temperature conditions of approximately 53°F. The site work was conducted by Sensequake’s local partner, JMC2. For Bays 10–11 through 32–33, each was instrumented using ten Sensequake Larzé wireless sensors per setup using the same layout. In contrast, Bay 35–36 required a modified approach due to its expanded geometry and the presence of ten concrete panels. To accommodate this, a revised sensor configuration was implemented. The placement ensured coverage across all panels. Figure 4-3: Testing of the Hermosa Beach Pier To extract the baseline properties of the structure, 424 locations were selected to deploy sensors and collect ambient vibration data with 6 channels per sensor location resulting in 2544 vibration sensor channels. The test involved 10 Larzé Sensors over 53 setups. The sensors were placed on the pier panels with selected locations. Data was collected for 10 minutes in each setup under operational conditions. Page 468 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 17 The sensor layout is designed considering the geometry, structural configuration, and current condition of the structure (see Appendix A for the detailed sensor layouts). The structure's dimensions, including Bay length, were measured during testing and verified against the original drawings. This data was also used to prepare 3D models of each pier bay (Figure 4-4). Sensor data is applied to the model, as shown by the red triaxial icons in the Figure. Figure 4-4: 3D Model of the Hermosa Beach Pier with sensor locations The axis orientation for the 3D model is the same as the sensor axes on site. It should be noted that the 3D model is a simplified geometrical model to better visualize the mode shapes. The model is simplified and does not include detailed structural information, such as connections, dimensions, and material properties. Movement at the locations without sensors is ass umed for better visualizations. However, all conclusions on structural integrity are based solely on the data measured by the sensors. Page 469 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 18 4.3 Dynamic Property Results (Stiffness Baselines) Both time and frequency domain techniques were used to derive the modal p roperties of the sections of the Pier. The average singular values for the spans are shown in the figures in the following sub-sections. Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), employed for frequency -domain analysis, identifies peaks representing potential structural modes. These peaks correspond to the vertical lines from the stochastic subspace identification (SSI) shown in the figures, a time - domain method. It is important to note that not all peaks represent structural modes. The associated frequencies, periods and damping ratios are summarized in the tables in each section. Finally, the mode shapes are detailed for each identified mode of the sections. The digital copies of the animations for each mode shape have been provided for better visualization. Page 470 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 19 4.3.1 Results of the Test - Bay 10-11 Figure 4-5: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 10-11, Hermosa Beach Pier Table 4-1: Modal Properties for Bay 10-11, Hermosa Beach Pier Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 – 1st Transverse 2.64 0.38 1.4 2 – 1st Vertical 8.47 0.12 2.0 Page 471 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 20 Table 4-2: Mode 1, Bay 10-11, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 10–11 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 2.64 0.38 1.4 Mode 1 - 1st Transverse Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 472 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 21 Table 4-3: Mode 2, Bay 10-11, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 10–11 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 2 8.47 0.12 2.0 Mode 2 - 1st Vertical Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 473 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 22 4.3.2 Results of the Test - Bay 12-13 Figure 4-6: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 12-13, Hermosa Beach Pier Table 4-4: Modal Properties for Bay 12-13, Hermosa Beach Pier Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 – 1st Transverse 1.72 0.58 2.0 2 – 1st Vertical 8.13 0.12 1.7 Page 474 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 23 Table 4-5: Mode 1, Bay 12-13, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 12-13 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 1.72 0.58 2.0 Mode 1 - 1st Transverse Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 475 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 24 Table 4-6: Mode 2, Bay 12-13, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 12-13 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 2 8.13 0.12 1.7 Mode 2 - 1st Vertical Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 476 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 25 4.3.3 Results of the Test - Bay 13-14 Figure 4-7: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 13-14, Hermosa Beach Pier Table 4-7: Modal Properties for Bay 13-14, Hermosa Beach Pier Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 – 1st Transverse 1.70 0.59 2.0 2 – 1st Vertical 8.11 0.12 1.3 Page 477 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 26 Table 4-8: Mode 1, Bay 13-14, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 13-14 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 1.70 0.59 2.0 Mode 1 - 1st Transverse Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 478 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 27 Table 4-9: Mode 2, Bay 13-14, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 13-14 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 2 8.11 0.12 1.3 Mode 2 - 1st Vertical Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 479 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 28 4.3.4 Results of the Test - Bay 15-16 Figure 4-8: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 15-16, Hermosa Beach Pier Table 4-10: Modal Properties for Bay 15-16, Hermosa Beach Pier Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 – 1st Transverse 1.70 0.59 1.9 2 – 1st Vertical 8.04 0.12 1.5 Page 480 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 29 Table 4-11: Mode 1, Bay 15-16, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 15-16 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 1.70 0.59 1.9 Mode 1 - 1st Transverse Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 481 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 30 Table 4-12: Mode 2, Bay 15-16, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 15-16 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 2 8.04 0.12 1.5 Mode 2 - 1st Vertical Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 482 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 31 4.3.5 Results of the Test - Bay 18-19 Figure 4-9: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 18-19, Hermosa Beach Pier Table 4-13: Modal Properties for Bay 18-19, Hermosa Beach Pier Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 – 1st Transverse 1.72 0.58 2.4 2 – 1st Vertical 8.06 0.12 3.4 Page 483 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 32 Table 4-14: Mode 1, Bay 18-19, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 18-19 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 1.72 0.58 2.4 Mode 1 - 1st Transverse Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 484 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 33 Table 4-15: Mode 2, Bay 18-19, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 18-19 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 2 8.06 0.12 3.4 Mode 2 - 1st Vertical Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 485 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 34 4.3.6 Results of the Test - Bay 21-22 Figure 4-10: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 21-22, Hermosa Beach Pier Table 4-16: Modal Properties for Bay 21-22, Hermosa Beach Pier Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 – 1st Transverse 1.83 0.55 6.4 2 – 1st Vertical 8.24 0.12 4.7 Page 486 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 35 Table 4-17: Mode 1, Bay 21-22, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 21-22 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 1.83 0.55 6.4 Mode 1 - 1st Transverse Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 487 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 36 Table 4-18: Mode 2, Bay 21-22, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 21-22 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 2 8.24 0.12 4.7 Mode 2 - 1st Vertical Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 488 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 37 4.3.7 Results of the Test - Bay 27-28 Figure 4-11: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 27-28, Hermosa Beach Pier Table 4-19: Modal Properties for Bay 27-28, Hermosa Beach Pier Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 – 1st Transverse 1.66 0.60 2.7 2 – 1st Vertical 10.34 0.10 3.7 Page 489 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 38 Table 4-20: Mode 1, Bay 27-28, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 27-28 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 1.66 0.60 2.7 Mode 1 - 1st Transverse Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 490 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 39 Table 4-21: Mode 2, Bay 27-28, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 27-28 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 2 10.34 0.10 3.7 Mode 2 - 1st Vertical Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 491 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 40 4.3.8 Results of the Test - Bay 30-31 Figure 4-12: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 30-31, Hermosa Beach Pier Table 4-22: Modal Properties for Bay 30-31, Hermosa Beach Pier Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 – 1st Transverse 1.65 0.61 4.4 2 – 1st Vertical 9.38 0.11 3.5 Page 492 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 41 Table 4-23: Mode 1, Bay 30-31, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 30-31 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 1.65 0.61 4.4 Mode 1 - 1st Transverse Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 493 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 42 Table 4-24: Mode 2, Bay 30-31, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 30-31 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 2 9.38 0.11 3.5 Mode 2 - 1st Vertical Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 494 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 43 4.3.9 Results of the Test - Bay 32-33 Figure 4-13: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 32-33, Hermosa Beach Pier Table 4-25: Modal Properties for Bay 32-33, Hermosa Beach Pier Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 – 1st Transverse 1.48 0.68 4.5 2 – 1st Vertical 9.20 0.11 4.7 Page 495 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 44 Table 4-26: Mode 1, Bay 32-33, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 32-33 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 1.48 0.68 4.5 Mode 1 - 1st Transverse Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 496 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 45 Table 4-27: Mode 2, Bay 32-33, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 32-33 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 2 9.20 0.11 4.7 Mode 2 - 1st Vertical Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 497 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 46 4.3.10 Results of the Test - Bay 35-36 Figure 4-14: Singular value decomposition of the cross-spectral correlation, Bay 35-36, Hermosa Beach Pier Table 4-28: Modal Properties for Bay 35-36, Hermosa Beach Pier Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 – 1st Transverse 1.49 0.67 5.3 2 – 1st Vertical 10.80 0.09 0.5 Page 498 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 47 Table 4-29: Mode 1, Bay 35-36, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 35-36 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 1 1.49 0.67 5.3 Mode 1 - 1st Transverse Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 499 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 48 Table 4-30: Mode 2, Bay 35-36, Hermosa Beach Pier Bay 35-36 Modal Parameters Mode Natural Frequency (Hz) Natural Period (s) Damping Ratio (%) 2 10.80 0.09 0.5 Mode 2 - 1st Vertical Front-view Top-view Side-view 3D-view Page 500 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 49 5 Discussions: Integrity Evaluation Through the in-depth analysis of the ambient vibration data of the Pier, the natural frequencies, mode shapes, and damping ratios are identified. The degradation of a structure alters the overall stiffness of the pier and thus its modal properties. Structural degradation can be classified into two categories: symmetrical and asymmetrical degradation. Symmetrical degradation refers to a uniform reduction in the strength of the structural components, leading to a decrease in natural frequency that may preserve the symmetrical shape of the mode shape of vibration. Conversely, asymmetrical degradati on can result in an alteration of the mode shape geometry, rendering it asymmetrical. It is important to mention that even though the sensors were located on the deck level, the extracted dynamic properties are sensitive to stiffness changes coming from all structural components including the deck, panels, bents and foundations. Changes in the stiffness of each element impact the mode shapes differently. Using Sensequake’s unique database of healthy and unhealthy mode shapes, the cause of that anomaly in the mode shape can be identified. Moreover, the distortion in the mode shapes can be qua ntified to determine the severity of the damage as needed Page 501 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 50 Page 502 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 51 This approach allows for precise localization and severity classification of structural anomalies. The curvature value categories are used to assess the severity of structural anomalies based on the degree of distortion in the mode shape. They are classified as follows: • Curvature < 1% – Slight / None: Indicates a symmetric and healthy mode shape, with no significant structural concerns. • 1% ≤ Curvature < 3% – Minor: indicates mild irregularities, possibly early signs of localized flexibility or minor deterioration. Page 503 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 52 • 3% ≤ Curvature < 6% – Moderate: Reflects noticeable asymmetry in the mode shape, often associated with moderate structural issues or degradation. • 6% ≤ Curvature < 12% – High: Denotes substantial distortion, indicating pronounced damage or localized structural weakness. • Curvature > 12% – Severe: Represents critical structural concern, typically due to major cracks or significant loss of stiffness in a localized area. Based on these categories, Figure 5-3 provides the color coding, which helps illustrate different levels of structural deterioration and prioritize the areas in need of monitoring, maintenance, or immediate intervention. After computing the curvature values and classifying them according to severity, each line segment was categorized and color-coded accordingly. These categorized lines formed the basis for generating the transverse mode heat map, visually illustrating areas of structural concern. This quantification method is consistently applied to all transverse modes throughout the report for each Bay evaluated. Figure 5-3 Curvature categorization and color coding Page 504 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 53 The following subsections discuss the observations made in the Pier’s stiffness properties. Page 505 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 54 Figure 5-5: Structural condition based on quantified vertical curvature change 5.1 Mode Shape Evaluation – Bay 10-11 Based on the described evaluation integrity strategy, the transverse heat map for Bay 10-11 is shown in Figure 5-6. Figure 5-6: Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 10-11 Bay 10–11 overall shows significant inconsistency in vertical mode shapes, with the shear key C–D and surrounding nodes exhibiting the highest STDEV values in the region. Notably, the West-Mid and East-Joint nodes displayed strong deviations in magnitude (Table 5-1 and 5-2), resulting in a “High” classification. In contrast, in-panel nodes remained stable and consistent, indicating that the vertical flexibility anomalies were localized to the shear key line and external Page 506 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 55 nodes. These findings suggest potential localized degradation concentrated along the transverse shear key and joints, while the internal deck behavior remains relatively unaffected. Table 5-1 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 10-11 WEST JOINT WEST MID MID NODE EAST MID EAST JOINT AVG SOUTH EDGE 0.11 0.72 1.00 0.67 0.07 0.51 SK C-D 0.40 0.91 0.88 0.68 0.38 0.65 SK B-C 0.08 0.70 0.98 0.70 0.08 0.51 SK A-B 0.08 0.67 0.98 0.70 0.09 0.5 NORTH EDGE 0.07 0.69 0.97 0.66 0.10 0.5 AVG 0.15 0.74 0.96 0.68 0.14 STDEV 12.7% 8.9% 4.2% 1.5% 11.8% Table 5-2 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 10-11 IN-PANEL WEST WEST MID EAST MID EAST AVG PANEL D 0.40 0.93 0.88 0.38 0.64 PANEL C 0.42 0.92 0.89 0.37 0.65 PANEL B 0.41 0.92 0.88 0.39 0.65 PANEL A 0.38 0.90 0.85 0.40 0.63 AVG 0.40 0.92 0.87 0.39 STDEV 1.4% 0.9% 1.2% 1.0% Page 507 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 56 After calculating the STDEV values and classifying each line accordingly, a heat map for the vertical mode is generated to visually represent the performance and consistency of vertical flexibilities. This heat map highlights areas of potential concern, where elevated STDEV values indicate irregularities in mode shape amplitudes and suggest localized structural anomalies. The vertical heat map is generated based on the tables above for Bay 10-11 (Figure 5-7). Figure 5-7 Vertical Heat map for Bay 10-11 Overall, Bay 10–11 exhibits moderate deterioration in the transverse direction across all panels, with no severe anomalies detected. However, the vertical heat map reveals a concentrated high deterioration zone along the shear key between Panels C and D, aligning with the horizontal axis. The anomaly is consistently reflected in the combined heat map, emphasizing a localized stiffness degradation in that region. The overall behavior suggests that while the superstructure remains generally stable, the shear key line is a critical zone requiring attention due to potential vertical flexibility irregularities (Figure 5-8). Page 508 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 57 Figure 5-8 Combined heat maps comparison for Bay 10-11 5.2 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 12-13 Based on the localized curvature change, the heat map for the transverse mode is generated for Bay 12-13 (Figure 5-9). From the heat map, Panels C and D exhibited signs of high deterioration based on the curvature distribution. The observed vertical displacement in the inspection photos aligns with the localized mode shape distortion on the western side of Panel C, further validating the findings (Figure 5-10). Figure 5-9 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 12-13 For the vertical mode, the in-plane sensor nodes along the “Mid-East” line exhibit higher standard deviation values and were therefore classified as “Minor.” While Panels B, C, and D generally Page 509 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 58 demonstrate consistent behavior, a comparison with adjacent nodes along the “Mid -West” line revealed noticeable inconsistencies and elevated average magnitudes. To ensure a more conservative and precautionary evaluation, the entire “Mid -East” line was rated as exhibiting minor anomalies. Figure 5-10 Vertical displacement on Bay 12-13 Panel C Table 5-3 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 12-13 WEST JOINT WEST MID MID NODE EAST MID EAST JOINT AVG SOUTH EDGE 0.06 0.64 0.93 0.63 0.07 0.47 Shear Key C-D 0.10 0.64 0.95 0.65 0.08 0.48 Shear Key B-C 0.09 0.69 0.96 0.63 0.09 0.49 Shear Key A-B 0.09 0.69 0.95 0.67 0.10 0.50 NORTH EDGE 0.08 0.66 1.00 0.68 0.11 0.51 AVG 0.08 0.66 0.96 0.65 0.09 STDEV 1.2% 2.0% 2.2% 2.1% 1.4% Page 510 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 59 Table 5-4 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 12-13 IN-PANEL WEST WEST MID EAST MID EAST AVG PANEL D 0.38 0.81 0.86 0.39 0.61 PANEL C 0.38 0.87 0.86 0.39 0.63 PANEL B 0.38 0.85 0.87 0.41 0.63 PANEL A 0.38 0.83 0.92 0.42 0.64 AVG 0.38 0.84 0.88 0.40 STDEV 0.3% 2.1% 2.4% 1.2% The vertical heat map is generated based on the Tables above for Bay 12-13 (Figure 5-11). Figure 5-11 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 12-13 Overall, Bay 12-13 exhibits moderate to high deterioration in the transverse mode, particularly in Panels C and D. In contrast, the vertical mode shows only slight to minor anomalies, indicating relatively consistent vertical flexibility. The transverse heat map highlights significa nt localized curvature changes along the western side of Panel C, correlating with the large visible crack observed during visual inspection. This crack is likely the primary cause of the structural anomaly Page 511 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 60 in this bay. Panels A and B display comparatively better performance, reinforcing the localized nature of the deterioration (Figure 5-12). Figure 5-12 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 12-13 5.3 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 13-14 Based on the localized curvature change, the heat map for the transverse mode is generated for Bay 13-14 (Figure 5-13). Figure 5-13 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 13-14 Page 512 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 61 For the vertical mode, Table 5-5 and Table 5-6 show the magnitude for the vertical modes. After comparison and calculation of the standard deviation, for Bay 13-14, the vertical mode analysis reveals generally consistent behavior, with most nodes falling within the healthy STDEV range. However, moderate inconsistencies are observed at the Mid Node along the shear key A-B and at the East Mid position within the in-panel evaluation, particularly affecting Panels B and A. These localized irregularities suggest minor to moderate vertical flexibility issues in those areas. Table 5-5 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 13-14 WEST JOINT WEST MID MID NODE EAST MID EAST JOINT AVG SOUTH EDGE 0.09 0.68 0.99 0.72 0.11 0.52 Shear Key C-D 0.11 0.69 0.99 0.74 0.11 0.52 Shear Key B-C 0.11 0.71 1.00 0.72 0.11 0.53 Shear Key A-B 0.12 0.71 0.93 0.68 0.09 0.51 NORTH EDGE 0.12 0.66 0.98 0.68 0.1 0.51 AVG 0.11 0.69 0.98 0.71 0.1 STDEV 1.4% 1.8% 2.5% 2.3% 0.5% Page 513 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 62 Table 5-6 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 13-14 IN-PANEL WEST WEST MID EAST MID EAST AVG PANEL D 0.43 0.84 0.87 0.4 0.64 PANEL C 0.43 0.89 0.87 0.39 0.65 PANEL B 0.38 0.88 0.76 0.39 0.6 PANEL A 0.43 0.87 0.92 0.38 0.65 AVG 0.42 0.87 0.85 0.39 STDEV 2.0% 1.8% 5.9% 0.7% The vertical heat map is generated based on the Tables above for Bay 13-14 (Figure 5-14). Figure 5-14 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 13-14 Bay 13-14 exhibits overall minor to moderate deterioration (Figure 5-15). In the transverse mode, localized anomalies were observed near Panel C, while the vertical mode heat map indicate s moderate inconsistencies around Panel A and B. These findings align with the inspection photo, Page 514 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 63 which revealed visible spalling and delamination on Panel B (Figure 5-16), supporting the assessment of localized structural degradation in this bay. Figure 5-15 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 13-14 Figure 5-16 Delamination on Panel B of Bay 13-14 5.4 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 15-16 Based on the localized curvature change, the heat map for the transverse mode is generated for Bay 15-16 (Figure 5-17). Page 515 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 64 Figure 5-17 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 15-16 For the vertical mode, the analysis identified localized irregularities (Table 5-7 and 5-8), particularly at the East node in Panels B and A, where the STDEV reache s 7.4%, indicating moderate inconsistency in vertical flexibility. Additionally, slight anomalies are observed at the Mid Node. These variations suggest that while most areas in this bay performed consistently, specific zones—especially on the east side—may require closer attention. Table 5-7 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 15-16 WEST JOINT WEST MID MID NODE EAST MID EAST JOINT AVG SOUTH EDGE 0.06 0.66 0.93 0.65 0.08 0.48 SK C-D 0.07 0.68 0.94 0.67 0.10 0.49 SK B-C 0.08 0.67 0.95 0.65 0.11 0.49 SK A-B 0.07 0.66 0.96 0.69 0.12 0.50 NORTH EDGE 0.09 0.67 1.00 0.70 0.13 0.52 AVG 0.08 0.67 0.95 0.67 0.11 STDEV 1.0% 0.6% 2.5% 2.3% 1.7% Page 516 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 65 Table 5-8 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 15-16 IN-PANEL WEST WEST MID EAST MID EAST AVG PANEL D 0.45 0.88 0.87 0.35 0.64 PANEL C 0.44 0.92 0.87 0.34 0.64 PANEL B 0.42 0.9 0.88 0.49 0.67 PANEL A 0.47 0.89 0.92 0.49 0.69 AVG 0.44 0.9 0.88 0.42 STDEV 1.6% 1.2% 2.3% 7.4% The vertical heat map is generated based on the Tables above for Bay 15-16 (Figure 5-18). Figure 5-18 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 15-16 Overall, Bay 15-16 shows moderate to high deterioration in the transverse mode, with the most significant anomalies concentrated in Panels B, C, and D. The vertical mode reveal s minor to Page 517 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 66 moderate irregularities, particularly on the east side of Panels A and B (Figure 5-19). Visual inspection confirms a large spalling area on Panel B (Figure 5-20) and localized surface damage on Panels C and D, which aligns with the structural anomalies indicated in the heat maps. Figure 5-19 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 15-16 Figure 5-20 Panel B with large spalling area for Bay 15-16 Page 518 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 67 5.5 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 18-19 Based on the localized curvature change, the heat map for the transverse mode is generated for Bay 18-19 (Figure 5-21). Figure 5-21 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 18-19 For the vertical mode of Bay 18-19, analysis indicates a moderate inconsistency in mode shape amplitudes, particularly at the Mid Node and the West Mid panel zone (Table 5-7 and 5-8). The STDEV values reach 2.7% and 4.6% respectively, suggesting localized vertical flexibility irregularities. These findings point to developing anomalies that warrant monitoring, especially near the central and western areas of the span. Page 519 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 68 Table 5-9 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 18-19 WEST JOINT WEST MID MID NODE EAST MID EAST JOINT AVG SOUTH EDGE 0.13 0.7 1 0.76 0.12 0.54 SK C-D 0.13 0.74 0.99 0.78 0.11 0.55 SK B-C 0.11 0.72 0.98 0.75 0.13 0.54 SK A-B 0.11 0.72 0.93 0.74 0.1 0.52 NORTH EDGE 0.09 0.69 0.94 0.74 0.09 0.51 AVG 0.12 0.71 0.97 0.76 0.11 STDEV 1.4% 1.6% 2.7% 1.6% 1.5% Table 5-10 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 18-19 IN-PANEL WEST WEST MID EAST MID EAST AVG PANEL D 0.42 0.9 0.95 0.47 0.69 PANEL C 0.41 0.92 0.93 0.45 0.68 PANEL B 0.41 0.83 0.89 0.46 0.65 PANEL A 0.37 0.81 0.9 0.45 0.63 AVG 0.4 0.87 0.92 0.46 STDEV 1.9% 4.6% 2.2% 0.9% An additional anomaly is detected through visual inspection of the side-view mode shape (Figure 5-22), where the shear key C-D exhibits unexpected transverse movement on its western side. Page 520 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 69 This irregularity is also factored into the vertical mode heat map. Taking all findings into account, the comprehensive heat map for the vertical mode is presented in Figure 5 -23. Figure 5-22 Unexpected transverse movement on shear key C-D Bay 18-19 Figure 5-23 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 18-19 Bay 18-19 shows overall minor to moderate deterioration. In the transverse mode, localized anomalies are observed along the western portion of shear key C-D, where unexpected transverse movements are detected. This irregularity is confirmed through side-view mode Page 521 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 70 shape inspection and factored into the heat map. In the vertical mode, moderate inconsistencies are observed in Panels A and B, indicating localized vertical flexibility. These findings suggest developing structural concerns that merit continued observation (Figure 5-24). Figure 5-24 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 18-19 5.6 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 21-22 Based on the localized curvature change, the heat map for the transverse mode is generated for Bay 21-22 (Figure 5-25). Figure 5-25 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 21-22 Page 522 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 71 For Bay 21-22, the vertical mode analysis reveals minor to moderate deterioration. Although the STDEV values remained within acceptable limits, several nodes (particularly along the West Midline) exhibit high mode shape magnitudes, indicating elevated vertical flexibility. (Table 5-11 and 5-12) Additionally, the North Edge shows slight inconsistency, which contributes to localized concerns. These findings suggest early signs of vertical irregularities that warrant continued observation. Table 5-11 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 21-22 WEST JOINT WEST MID MID NODE EAST MID EAST JOINT AVG SOUTH EDGE 0.1 0.76 1.00 0.7 0.09 0.53 SK C-D 0.11 0.77 0.99 0.69 0.09 0.53 SK B-C 0.11 0.78 1.00 0.7 0.09 0.54 SK A-B 0.11 0.78 0.96 0.7 0.08 0.53 NORTH EDGE 0.12 0.73 1.00 0.69 0.08 0.52 AVG 0.11 0.76 0.99 0.69 0.08 STDEV 0.5% 2.1% 1.4% 0.5% 0.8% Table 5-12 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 21-22 IN-PANEL WEST WEST MID EAST MID EAST AVG PANEL D 0.47 0.92 0.87 0.37 0.65 PANEL C 0.46 0.96 0.86 0.39 0.67 PANEL B 0.45 0.92 0.89 0.42 0.67 PANEL A 0.44 0.92 0.91 0.4 0.67 AVG 0.45 0.93 0.88 0.39 STDEV 1.0% 1.8% 2.0% 1.8% Page 523 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 72 In addition to the vertical flexibility findings, Table 5-13 shows that Panels C and D in Bay 21-22 exhibit noticeably lower average vertical frequencies (8.19 Hz) compared to Panels A and B (8.42 Hz). This reduction in frequency suggests a localized loss of stiffness in the southern portion of the bay, further reinforcing the observation of moderate deteriorat ion in Panels C and D. Table 5-13 In-plane Frequency Comparison Bay 21-22 Bay 21-22 Avg Frequency (Hz) Panel A 8.42 Panel B 8.42 Panel C 8.19 Panel D 8.19 The excessive longitudinal flexibility observed in Bay 21-22 may also be attributed to deterioration in the bay structure beneath the deck. As illustrated in the comparison diagram (Figure 5-26), a healthy structure shows minimal lateral movement at the ends of the bent, whereas a deteriorated bent exhibits significant outward flexibility. This excessive flexibility is a strong indicator of weakened below-deck components, such as piles or pile-caps, which could contribute to the reduced frequency and observed irregularities in the mode shape behavior. Figure 5-26 Unexpected Longitudinal Flexibility on the bents Page 524 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 73 Figure 5-27 highlights the excessive longitudinal flexibility observed on the shore-side bent of Bay 21-22. The noticeable outward displacement as seen in the front view, suggests deterioration in the below-deck structural components. This deformation pattern is consistent with weakened or compromised below-deck elements near the shore-side, further supporting the earlier findings of reduced frequency and vertical flexibility in Panels C and D. Figure 5-27: Bent 21 Unexpected Longitudinal Flexibility (Front view) The vertical heat map is generated based on the Tables above for Bay 21-22. Panels C and D are rated as showing minor deterioration due to their lower average vertical frequencies compared to Panels A and B, indicating localized stiffness reduction. Additionally, excessive longitudinal flexibility is observed in Bent 21, particularly on the shore side, as shown in the mode shape deformation. This suggests deterioration in the below-deck components supporting Bent 21. These combined findings are reflected in the final vertical mode heat map shown in Figure 5-28. Page 525 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 74 Figure 5-28 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 21-22 Figure 5-29 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 21-22 Bay 21-22 exhibits moderate to high deterioration, with pronounced anomalies in both transverse and vertical modes. In the transverse heat map, significant localized curvature changes are observed in Panels A and B, particularly near Bent 21. Vertical mode analysis also rev eals reduced frequency in Panels C and D, along with excessive longitudinal flexibility in Bent 21 , pointing to potential deterioration in its below-deck components. Visual inspection confirms heavy cracking and spalling on Panel B (Figure 5-30), further supporting the structural concerns identified through the analysis. Page 526 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 75 Figure 5-30 Panel B large cracking and spalling area Bay 21-22 5.7 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 27-28 Based on the localized curvature change, the heat map for the transverse mode is generated for Bay 27-28 (Figure 5-31). Figure 5-31 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 27-28 Page 527 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 76 For Bay 27-28, the vertical mode analysis reveals moderate inconsistencies across several key locations. The West-Mid and Middle Node rows exhibit elevated STDEV values of 4.6%, indicating irregular mode shape behavior. The West Mid panel zone also reache s a STDEV of 7.9%, approaching the threshold for high inconsistency. These findings suggest uneven vertical flexibility, particularly concentrated in the western and central sections, pointing to developing structural irregularities in this bay. Table 5-14 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 27-28 WEST JOINT WEST MID MID NODE EAST MID EAST JOINT AVG SOUTH EDGE 0.11 0.71 1.00 0.56 0.10 0.50 SK C-D 0.12 0.72 0.98 0.69 0.11 0.53 SK B-C 0.11 0.68 1.00 0.69 0.11 0.52 SK A-B 0.10 0.66 0.91 0.65 0.09 0.48 NORTH EDGE 0.06 0.59 0.89 0.61 0.07 0.45 AVG 0.10 0.67 0.96 0.64 0.09 STDEV 1.9% 4.6% 4.6% 5.0% 1.6% As is shown in Tables 5-14 and 5-15, Panels A and B exhibit unexpected behavior, with vertical flexibility levels deviating from adjacent panels, highlighted by elevated STDEV values and visible deformation in the mode shape side and front views. Additionally, the east side of Panel D displays localized inconsistency in vertical response. These findings are used to prepare the final heat map, identifying moderate to high deterioration concentrated in the upper and eastern portions of the bay. From the side view, Panels A and B display significant inconsistency in vertical flexibility, along with the East-Mid node on the southern edge of Panel D. These irregularities are further supported by the front view, which reveals that the in-plane nodes at both the West-Mid and East-Mid positions exhibit noticeable inconsistency (Figure 5-32). Page 528 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 77 Table 5-15 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 27-28 IN-PANEL WEST WEST MID EAST MID EAST AVG PANEL D 0.38 0.91 0.91 0.31 0.63 PANEL C 0.4 0.97 0.91 0.38 0.67 PANEL B 0.42 0.81 0.82 0.38 0.61 PANEL A 0.33 0.76 0.82 0.36 0.57 AVG 0.38 0.86 0.87 0.36 STDEV 3.5% 7.9% 4.6% 2.9% Figure 5-32 Side view and Front View of 1st Vertical Mode of Bay 27-28 Overall, based on all identified anomalies, the vertical mode heat map for Bay 27 -28 was generated (Figure 5-33). The shear key between Panels A and B is marked in red due to a significant deviation in consistency at that location, indicating a concentrated change in structural Page 529 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 78 stiffness. This area represents a critical zone of concern where vertical flexibility irregularities are most pronounced. Figure 5-33 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 27-28 Bay 27-28 exhibits moderate to high deterioration overall. The transverse heat map reveals an unexpected inconsistency at Shear Key A-B, indicating a potential localized stiffness change. In the vertical mode, Panels A and B demonstrate significant flexibility deviations, w ith additional localized irregularities observed on the east side of Panel D (Figure 5-34). Visual inspection confirms these findings, with large cracks identified on Panel A and surface deterioration on Panels B and D (Figure 5-35). These combined observations suggest a need for further structural attention in the upper sections of this bay. Page 530 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 79 Figure 5-34 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 27-28 Figure 5-35 Large cracks have been observed on Panel A Bay 27-28 Page 531 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 80 5.8 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 30-31 Based on the localized curvature change, the heat map for the transverse mode is generated for Bay 30-31 (Figure 5-36). Figure 5-36 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 30-31 Bay 30-31 exhibits significant deterioration in the transverse mode at 1.69 Hz. The heat map reveals severe localized anomalies, especially concentrated in Panels C and D. Panel B also shows high curvature deviations, indicating notable structural irregularities. The distri bution of red and dark red zones highlights substantial stiffness loss and distortion, suggesting this bay has one of the highest levels of transverse degradation among the evaluated spans. For the vertical mode, analysis indicates localized inconsistencies, particularly at the Mid Node and East-Mid zones. The Mid Node shows a STDEV of 2.5%, and the East-Mid panel zone reached 2.7%, both falling in the “Minor” anomaly range (Table 5-14 and 5-15). These results suggest mild deviations in vertical flexibility, especially around the southern and central sections. Although not severe, the presence of these irregularities supports the overall assessment of structural degradation observed in the transverse mode. Page 532 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 81 Table 5-16 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 30-31 WEST JOINT WEST MID MID NODE EAST MID EAST JOINT AVG SOUTH EDGE 0.15 0.77 0.98 0.75 0.1 0.55 SK C-D 0.14 0.75 1.00 0.73 0.09 0.54 SK B-C 0.11 0.76 0.98 0.68 0.09 0.53 SK A-B 0.12 0.76 0.93 0.65 0.06 0.50 NORTH EDGE 0.11 0.73 0.96 0.65 0.07 0.50 AVG 0.12 0.75 0.97 0.69 0.08 STDEV 1.5% 1.2% 2.5% 4.0% 1.7% Table 5-17 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 30-31 IN-PANEL WEST WEST MID EAST MID EAST AVG PANEL D 0.47 0.94 0.93 0.47 0.7 PANEL C 0.47 0.94 0.9 0.42 0.68 PANEL B 0.41 0.9 0.93 0.43 0.67 PANEL A 0.44 0.91 0.98 0.46 0.7 AVG 0.45 0.92 0.94 0.44 STDEV 2.3% 1.7% 2.7% 1.9% Page 533 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 82 The shear key between Panels A and B exhibits vertical inconsistencies, as is shown in the vertical mode shape in Figure 5-37, not aligned with other shear keys, indicating localized stiffness variation. Additionally, in-panel nodes on the east side of Panels A and B show unexpected behavior, as confirmed through both side and front view observations (Figure 5-37). These irregularities contribute to the moderate anomaly ratings and highlight the need for closer monitoring of vertical performance in the northern portion of the bay. Figure 5-37 Side view and Front View of 1st Vertical Mode of Bay 30-31 Figure 5-38 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 30-31 Page 534 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 83 Overall, Bay 30-31 exhibits high to severe deterioration in the transverse mode, particularly concentrated in Panel C, which shows the most critical structural response. The vertical mode indicates minor to moderate deterioration, with irregularities noted in Panels A and B, especia lly on the east side (Figures 5-38 and 5-39). Visual inspection confirms structural distress in Panel C (Figure 5-40), where large cracks and spalling were observed on the soffit, reinforcing the heat map findings and underscoring the need for interven tion in this bay. Figure 5-39 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 30-31 Figure 5-40 Panel C large cracks and spalling, Bay 30-31 Page 535 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 84 5.9 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 32-33 Bay 32-33 exhibits widespread and severe deterioration in the transverse mode at 1.48 Hz. The heat map highlights a concentration of anomalies throughout the western half of the bay , particularly in Panels B, C, and D, where severe curvature deviations are observed. Panel B shows asymmetric deformation at multiple locations, and Panel C displays the most critical anomaly, extending fully across its width. These findings suggest substantial loss of stiffness and structural integrity, indicating that Bay 32-33 is among the most deteriorated sections assessed in the superstructure (Figure 5-41). Figure 5-41 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 32-33 For the vertical mode, analysis reveals severe inconsistency, particularly in the West Mid and Mid Node rows, and shear key B-C, where STDEV values reach 9.6% and 11.0%, respectively — well into the “High” and “Severe” ranges. These values indicate a substantial v ariation in vertical flexibility along those lines. Additionally, moderate irregularities are observed along the East-Mid line (Table 5-16). Panel-wise, flexibility appears more consistent, though slightly elevated variation is noted at the West Mid in-panel nodes (Table 5-17). These findings confirm significant degradation in vertical performance, supporting the severe deterioration observed in the transverse mode. Page 536 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 85 Table 5-18 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 32-33 WEST JOINT WEST MID MID NODE EAST MID EAST JOINT AVG SOUTH EDGE 0.10 0.58 0.73 0.52 0.05 0.40 SK C-D 0.09 0.55 0.72 0.52 0.06 0.39 SK B-C 0.12 0.76 1.00 0.71 0.09 0.54 SK A-B 0.12 0.74 0.71 0.53 0.07 0.43 NORTH EDGE 0.08 0.54 0.76 0.54 0.07 0.40 AVG 0.10 0.63 0.78 0.56 0.07 STDEV 1.5% 9.6% 11.0% 7.1% 1.4% Table 5-19 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the in-plane nodes Bay 32-33 IN-PANEL WEST WEST MID EAST MID EAST AVG PANEL D 0.32 0.67 0.71 0.31 0.5 PANEL C 0.32 0.69 0.69 0.3 0.5 PANEL B 0.32 0.63 0.67 0.28 0.48 PANEL A 0.3 0.63 0.7 0.27 0.47 AVG 0.31 0.65 0.69 0.29 STDEV 1.0% 2.3% 1.7% 1.6% Page 537 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 86 The side view indicates that the shear key between Panels B and C exhibits significant vertical flexibility, leading to the entire line being categorized as “High.” In the front view, Bent 32 shows unexpected longitudinal flexibility, similar to the behavior observed in Bay 21-22. This suggests that the below-deck components of Bent 32 may have deteriorated, contributing to the excessive movement and structural inconsistency in this area (Figure 5-42). Figure 5-42 Side view and Front View of 1st Vertical Mode of Bay 32-33 Figure 5-43 presents the final heat map for vertical mode in Bay 32-33, incorporating all observed anomalies. The shear key between Panels B and C is rated as “High” due to pronounced flexibility, as confirmed from the side view. Additionally, the entire eastern edge and midspan along Panel B show severe inconsistency. The front view further highlight s unexpected longitudinal flexibility at Bent 32, suggesting deterioration of its below-deck components. These combined factors result in the widespread red zo nes across Panel B and its edges, signalling a critical need for structural attention in this bay. Page 538 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 87 Figure 5-43 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 32-33 Figure 5-44 shows severe cracking in Panel C near the shear key B -C. The width and propagation of the cracks confirm the structural distress identified in the vertical mode analysis. This damage aligns with the high flexibility detected at the B -C shear key, further validating the heat map results and highlighting the need for immediate attention in this critical area. Figure 5-44 Large cracking along the shear key B-C on Panel C, Bay 32-33 Bay 32-33 exhibits high to severe deterioration in the transverse mode and moderate to high deterioration in the vertical mode. Shear keys B -C and C-D show unexpected flexibility and Page 539 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 88 asymmetry (Figure 5-45), aligning with the severe deformation patterns seen in both mode shape heat maps. Notably, large cracks are visually identified in Panels A and C, particularly near the B-C shear key, as shown in the inspection photo. These findings confirm significant structural damage and highlight this bay as one of the most critical ly affected sections. Figure 5-45 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 32-33 5.10 Mode Shape Evaluation - Bay 35-36 The superstructure heat map for the transverse mode provides a broader context for structural performance across the deck. Notable deformation is concentrated in the western region near the opening, where Panel B and the adjacent node area are marked in red, indicating severe lateral flexibility. Additional areas of high and moderate concern appear around Panel D and its eastern edge. This widespread pattern of irregularity, especially near key support locations and the central opening, reinforces previous findings and suggests significant lateral instability in the superstructure (Figure 5-46). Page 540 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 89 Figure 5-46 Transverse Heat Map generation Bay 35-36 Figure 5-47 highlights a critical area of deterioration observed at the west part of Panel A and B in Bay 35-36. The photo shows extensive spalling and exposed, corroded reinforcement, indicating severe degradation of the concrete cover. The mapped location on the floor plan corresponds with one of the severe anomalies identified in the transverse mode heat map, further validating the structural concerns in this region of the superstructure. Page 541 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 90 Figure 5-47 Large opening area on Panel A and B, Bay 35-36 For the vertical mode, the standard deviation (STDEV) values indicate that the nodes along the longitudinal direction—especially those between Panels D and C, A1 and A2, and A2 and A3— exhibit moderate inconsistencies in vertical flexibility, with S TDEV ranging from 3.6% to 4.3% (Table 5-20). This suggests localized anomalies in these regions. While the mid nodes show consistent behavior, the surrounding edges and joints highlight variability. From the side view of the mode shape, the northern part of the east joint shows higher flexibilities compared with the west joint (Figure 5-48). Page 542 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 91 Table 5-20 Node Vertical Magnitude Comparison for the edge nodes Bay 35-36 WEST JOINT WEST MID MID NODE EAST MID EAST JOINT AVG SOUTH EDGE 0.17 0.85 1.00 0.68 0.17 0.57 D3-D2 0.16 0.81 1.00 0.65 0.18 0.56 D2-D1 0.18 0.83 0.97 0.66 0.16 0.56 D1-D 0.16 0.82 0.95 0.69 0.18 0.56 D-C 0.02 0.79 0.98 0.68 0.17 0.53 C-B 0.15 0.81 0.95 0.65 0.19 0.55 B-A 0.11 0.81 0.95 0.67 0.20 0.55 A-A1 0.11 0.83 0.98 0.68 0.22 0.56 A1-A2 0.10 0.91 0.97 0.71 0.25 0.59 A2-A3 0.11 0.76 0.96 0.77 0.26 0.57 NORTH EDGE 0.13 0.75 0.99 0.76 0.26 0.58 AVG 0.13 0.81 0.97 0.69 0.20 STDEV 4.3% 4.2% 1.8% 3.9% 3.6% Figure 5-48: Side view and Front View of 1st Vertical Mode of Bay 35-36 Page 543 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 92 Overall, the vertical heat map is generated (Figure 5-49) based on the identified inconsistencies in vertical flexibility, notably at Shear Keys A2–A1 and C–D, which both displayed behavior that deviated from adjacent shear keys. Additionally, the northern side of Bay 35-36 shows moderate vertical anomalies, suggesting localized stiffness variation. These findings align with the previously quantified STDEV results and observed below-deck deterioration near the northwest corner of the structure. Figure 5-49 Vertical Heat Map for Bay 35-36 Overall, the transverse heat map indicates Moderate to High deterioration, particularly on the western edge near Panels A3 and D1 (Figure 5-50). The vertical mode results show mostly Minor to Moderate deterioration, with localized issues observed around Shear Keys A2 –A1 and C–D. Notably, the opening between Panels A and B exhibits visible corrosion and spalling, as seen in the inspection photo, suggesting that this localized damage may contribute to further structural degradation in the area. Page 544 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 93 Figure 5-50 Combined Heat Maps for Bay 35-36 5.11 Frequency Comparison and Discussion The frequency comparison across the evaluated bays reveals patterns in structural stiffness and potential deterioration (Table 5-21). In the 1st vertical mode, the most impactful mode for the structure, frequencies show variation depending on bay locations and structural integrity, providing insight into the relative stiffness of each zone. These frequencies were grouped among three groups: the three-pile bay configurations (blue), the four-pile bay configurations (green), and the uniquely shaped Bay 35-36 (orange). Table 5-21 Frequency Comparison for all the tested bays Frequency (Hz) 10-11 12-13 13-14 15-16 18-19 21-22 27-28 30-31 32-33 35-36 1st Vertical Mode 8.42 8.13 8.11 8.04 8.06 8.24 10.34 9.38 9.20 10.80 Page 545 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 94 Among the three-pile bay configurations, Bay 15–16 exhibits the lowest vertical mode frequency at 8.04 Hz, indicating reduced global stiffness in this region. This observation aligns with mode shape analyses, which reveal high to severe deterioration, especially in the transverse direction. Such a frequency drop suggests possible structural weakening in both the superstructure and substructure components. Among the four-pile bays, Bay 21–22 exhibits the lowest frequency of 8.24 Hz, approximately 20% lower than other bays such as 27–28, which recorded frequencies of 10.34 Hz. The drop in resonance frequency in Bay 21–22 corresponds to the excessive longitudinal flexibility observed in the mode shape, pointing toward possible stiffness loss in the Bent 21 support system or deterioration in below-deck components. This correlation reinforces the reliability of using modal frequency data as an indicator of structural condition. Bays 30–31 and 32–33, also four-pile bays, show relatively low frequencies at 9.38 Hz and 9.20 Hz, respectively. These values, while not as low as bay 21–22, still fall beneath typical healthy thresholds for similar structural configurations. These results are consistent with observed damage in the corresponding heat maps, where both bays present widespread deterioration, particularly in transverse directions. The combined interpretation of frequency values and mode shape anomalies suggests that these bays are experiencing compromised structural performance and warrant closer inspection or mitigation planning. Overall, the frequency comparison demonstrates strong alignment with visual and modal evaluation findings, offering a valuable diagnostic tool to identify zones with reduced stiffness and potential structural issues. Page 546 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 95 6 Conclusion This report presented the results of the baseline test of targeted bays of the Hermosa Beach Pier using Sensequake's proprietary sensing-based structural health monitoring to evaluate its integrity and detect and locate major damage if any. The Hermosa Beach Pier has overall 36 bays, 10 of which were selected for evaluation. The majority of the bays are constructed by four prestressed concrete panels linked by shear keys and supported by two bents, 30.5 feet in length and 20 feet wide for the span. The end bay, Bay 35-36 has 10 concrete panels linked by shear keys. The existing pier was constructed in 1965. Sensequake’s unique baseline identification of the Pier was performed to identify its as-is baseline parameters. The following was achieved using the measured data: • Multiple 3D mode shapes and natural frequencies (dynamic properties or stiffness baselines); • Multiple structural integrity baselines for the individual bays of the Pier; The evaluation revealed that all tested bays exhibit ed varying levels of deterioration, with notable damage concentrated in specific panels and structural regions. Bays 15 –16, 21–22, 30–31, and 32–33 showed moderate to high deterioration in both transverse and vertical modes. In particular, Panels B, C, and D across multiple bays were frequently identified as zones of concern, often associated with visible cracks, spalling, or delamination. Severe anomalies were most prominent in Bay 32–33, where both mode shape distortion and frequency drop confirmed critical loss of stiffness and structural degradation. Vertical mode evaluations revealed widespread localized flexibility, particularly along shear keys and midspan nodes, with elevated standard deviation (STDEV) values often exceeding 3%, and in some cases reaching levels classified as “High” or “Severe.” The presence of excessive Page 547 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 96 longitudinal flexibility in Bents 21 and 32 suggested possible substructure deterioration, likely in the form of weakened piles or below-deck components. Transverse mode shape assessments consistently highlighted curvature changes at shear key connections, with many spans showing clear asymmetries and deformation patterns. These findings were validated by observed damage, such as large cracks near shear key B –C in Bay 32–33 and widespread soffit deterioration in Panels C and D of Bay 30–31. In Bay 35–36, the unique ten-panel configuration displayed asymmetrical flexibility, particularly in the opening area, where exposed reinforcement and spalling were documented. Frequency comparison across the spans further supported the heat map results. Lower natural frequencies correlated well with regions of reduced stiffness and higher deterioration. Notably, Bay 21–22 and Bay 15–16 had the lowest recorded vertical mode frequencies (8.04 Hz), indicating significant structural flexibility relative to other spans such as Bay 27–28 and Bay 35– 36, which maintained higher frequencies over 10 Hz. In summary, the combination of dynamic testing, curvature quantification, vertical flexibility analysis, and visual inspection has provided a detailed and reliable assessment of the Hermosa Beach Pier's structural condition. The findings confirm that multiple spans are experiencing progressive deterioration, with several regions requiring immediate attention or fur ther investigation. Future repetition of this same test can be used for long-term structural health management and support the development of targeted maintenance and retrofit strateg ies to extend the Pier’s service life. Page 548 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 97 7 References Brincker, R. and Ventura, C., 2015. Introduction to operational modal analysis. John Wiley & Sons. Hans, S., Boutin, C., Ibraim, E., Roussillon, P., 2005. In Situ Experiments and Seismic Analysis of Existing Buildings. Part I: Experimental Investigations. The Journal o f the International Association for Earthquake Engineering, 2005, 1513 -1529. Lamarche, C.P., Paultre, P., Proulx, J., Mousseau, S., 2007. Assessment of the Frequency Domain Decomposition Technique by Forced Vibration Tests of a Full-Scale Structure. The Journal of the International Association for Earthquake Engineering, 487 -494. Trifunac, M.D., 1972. Comparisons between Ambient and Forced Vibration Experiments. The Journal of the International Association for Earthquake Engineering, 133 -150. Kelly, A. J., Sauer, E. K., Barbour, S. L., Christiansen, E. A., & Widger, R. A. (1995). Deformation of the Hermosa Beach Pier by an active landslide in clay shale. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 32(4), 701-724. Page 549 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 98 Appendix A – Sensor Layout Page 550 of 1126 Hermosa Beach Pier – Sensequake-based Structural Integrity Evaluation Report 99 Page 551 of 1126 2016 - Kelly Gibson / South Bay Legend 2016 - Charles “Chip” Post / Pioneer 2016 - Ted Robinson / Champion 2016 - John Leininger / Cultural Legend 2015 - Mike Benavidez 2015 - Chris Barela 2014 - John “Merc” Mcfarlane 2013 - Mike Doyle 2011 - Tom Rice 2010 - Tiger Makin 2009 - Donald Craig 2008 - John “Peff” Eick 2007 - Alf Laws 2007 - Donald Takayama 2007 - Pioneers: Bev Morgan, Toby Erlinger, Patrick O’ Connor, Rosemary Reimers-Rice 2006 - Pioneers: Wally Bennett, “Tulie” Clark, Douglas Craig John Dominis, Mark Kauffman, Joseph P. Kerwin, Art Rogers, Olin “Olie” L. Scrivens Jr. 2005 - Mary Setterholm 2005—Darryl Dickie 2004 - The Meistrell Brothers: Bill and Bob 2004 - Sonny Vardeman 2003 - Phil Becker 2003 - Greg Noll 2003 - Dewy Weber 2003 - Dale Velzy 2003 - Hap Jacobs 2003– Surfers Walk of Fame Program Bio 2018 - Kip Jerger / South Bay Legend 2018 - Candace “Candy” Woodward / Female Legend 2018 - Scott Daley / Champion 2017 - Jim Graham / Pioneer 2017 - Mary Lou McGinnis-Drummy / Female Legend 2017 - Chris Frohoff / Champion 2015 - Dennis Jarvis 2015 - Derek Levy 2014 - Pioneers: Becher Anderson, Bob Bergstrom, Stu Linder, Richard “Mo” Meine, Warren Miller, Fenton “Fent Scholes 2014 - Sparky Hudson 2012 - Mary Levy 2012 - Steve Wilkings 2011 - Richard Mobley 2009 - Robert Hogan 2008 - Henry Ford 2007 - Mike Stevenson 2007 - John “Whitney” Guild 2006 - John Baker 2006 - Mike “Bones” Bright 2005 - Chris Bredesen 2005 - George Freeth 2004 - John Joseph 2004 - Linda Benson 2003 - Edie Talbot 2003 - Dru Harrison 2003 - Rick Stoner 2003 - Bing Copeland 2003 - Mike Purpus 2003 - Pioneers: Doc Ball, Hop Swarts, Leroy Grannis, Jim Bailey, Bill Edgar, Ed Edgar, Bob Bacon, Ward Baker, Mary Kerwin Riehl, Fred Kerin, John Kerwin, Ted Kerwin, Jim Kerwin, Al Holland, Paul Mathies, Cliff Tucker City Council Plaque 2019 - Ron Garner / Pioneer 2019 - Pat Ryan / South Bay Legend 2019 - The Beach Boys / Cultural Legend SURFER’S WALK OF FAME PLAQUE LAYOUT W N S E Page 552 of 1126 Surfer’s Walk of Fame Plaque Replacement Options 1 Option 1: Railing Mounted Plaque – Sample Location Page 553 of 1126 Surfer’s Walk of Fame Plaque Replacement Options 2 Option 1: Railing Mounted Plaque – Sample 6”x5” Plate Layout Page 554 of 1126 CONCEPT SKETCH PROVIDED BY PHIL ROBERTS Option 2A: Schumacher Plaza - Lighted Wall •Build a lighted wall for the plaques surrounding the Tim Kelly Statue from the cement base. (approximately 58’ long – rough estimate) •Height TBD but below average eye level. •Plaques would only include the name of the inductee, the category, and the year. Surfer’s Walk of Fame Replacement Options3Page 555 of 1126 •Place plaques surrounding the Tim Kelly statue base into the ground. •Plaques could surround the statue like a circle or be placed only in the front as a half circle. •Plaques would only include the name of the inductee, the category, and the year. Option 2B: Schumacher Plaza – Ground Mounted Surfer’s Walk of Fame Replacement Options4Page 556 of 1126 CIP 623 MUNICIPAL PIER STRUCTURAL INSPECTION AND EVALUATION, REPAIR, AND REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT MARCH 24, 2026 Page 557 of 1126 Background Overview Comprehensive structural assessment complete Cost – benefits analysis to guide decision making Current design effort Recommendations Page 558 of 1126 Background Pier Constructed in 1965 Various repairs and renovations since – last major repair CIP 629 in 2023-2024 ($3.1M) per 2017 inspection New inspection (CIP 623)initiated September 2024. Page 559 of 1126 Background 2024 Inspections Above and below water, ambient vibration Page 560 of 1126 Background May 13, 2025 CIP Study Session (preliminary update) $6.7M in repairs needed over next 5 years. –Only $3.7M available for FY 25-26. –Another $3M needed in 3 to 5 years Corrosion spall in pile cap Page 561 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Structural Assessment Findings Completed January 2026 Detailed inspection observations, structural significance, repair and maintenance recommendations, and cost estimates for repairs. Construction repair programming to establish budgets and timelines to maintain and repair the Pier for the next 45 years through the end of the Pier’s serviceable lifespan. Leaking water linePage 562 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Structural Assessment Findings The Pier is currently in poor to serious condition. Load rating remains reduced to 5-ton versus 10-ton design. Reinspection and repairs will be required at least every 5 years. Page 563 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Structural Assessment Findings Corrosion spall and delamination in soffit or panel Fracture with spall in soffit of panel Page 564 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Structural Assessment Findings Internal fracture, delamination, and vertical deflection in panel Fracture in panel Page 565 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Structural Assessment Findings 1. Near-Term – High Priority (required repairs by 2026) Replace 4 concrete deck panels. Strengthening 14 deck panels. Crack injection & spall repair ~35% of deck panel soffits. Estimated Construction Cost: $3.25M (2025 dollars); design and permitting is well underway as part of CIP 623. Page 566 of 1126 Sample High Priority Repair/Replacement Page 567 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Structural Assessment Findings 2. Near-Term – Medium Priority (required repairs in 3-5 years) Concrete Pile Cap crack injection & spall repair ~80% of pile caps. Concrete Deck Panels crack injection & spall repair to ~45% of deck panel soffits and 90% of deck panel tops. Estimated Construction Cost: $3.22M in 2025 dollars (or $3.92M in 2030 dollars). Pile cap corrosion spall Page 568 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Structural Assessment Findings 3. Mid-Term (required repairs in 6 - 10 years) Concrete pile spall repairs & fiberglass jacket repairs to approximately 6 piles. Concrete pile caps spall repairs anticipated to be identified in future inspection efforts. Estimated Construction Cost: $4.38M in 2025 dollars (or $6.49M in 2035 dollars). Pile corrosion spall Page 569 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Structural Assessment Findings 4. Long-Term (required repair beyond 10 years) Additional repairs to pile repairs, pile cap repairs, and deck panels anticipated as deterioration continues to accelerate. The existing Pier facility is more than 60 years old and nearing the end of its service life. Concrete structures in marine environment typically require concrete corrosion repairs on 5-year cycles after they reach 50-years of age. The volume and cost of these repairs accelerate until the end of the facility’s useful life. Page 570 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Cost – Benefit Analysis Assist in identifying most cost-efficient timing for potential replacement with a new structure. Analysis compares significant capital outlay cost of a new facility with projected escalating cost of repairs as the Pier nears the end of its service life. Benefit of a new facility includes very low to no maintenance costs for the first ~15 to 20 years. Corrosion spall Page 571 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Cost – Benefit Analysis Page 572 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Cost – Benefit Analysis Cumulative projected cost of more than $210M over the next 44 years to maintain the existing structure. Cost for a new replacement Pier is anticipated to be about $44.5M (in 2025 dollars) Replacement would be a lengthy process: 6 to 8 years before construction could begin. Page 573 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Cost – Benefit Analysis $80,000,000 $130,000,000 $180,000,000 $230,000,000 $280,000,000 $330,000,000 $380,000,000 $430,000,000 Cost in DollarsPier Replacement Year$107.8MTotal Pier Costs (2025 - 2070) Based on Year the Pier is Replaced $103.9MPage 574 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Cost – Benefit Analysis $- $50,000,000 $100,000,000 $150,000,000 $200,000,000 $250,000,000 Cost in DollarsYear Cumulative Pier Costs (2025 - 2070) Replace Pier in 2032 Repair Existing Pier through 2070 Page 575 of 1126 Discussion 2026 Structural Assessment Recommendations Cease further repairs to existing Pier after the 2027 project is complete. Replacement in 2032 would save the City $107M by 2070. Planning and environmental review would need to begin by end of 2026 to start construction in 2032. Continued inspection and repair would be required if not replaced in 2032. Replacement costs begin to rise substantially after 2036. Page 576 of 1126 Discussion Current Project – CIP 623 High priority improvements must be completed within 1 to 2 years. Final Design: 75% complete – approaching final Permitting: Water Board and US Army Corps of Engineers – complete Coastal Commission – pending Schedule: Target start of construction October 2026 Funding: $3.7M in FY 25-26 CIP – grant funding unavailable Page 577 of 1126 Discussion Current Project – CIP 623 Surfer’s Walk of Fame Plaques 60 plaques honoring surfing legends inducted from 2003 - 2019 Program on hold since 2020. Original installation damaged concrete panel Project will remove and fill with concrete. Page 578 of 1126 Discussion Current Project – CIP 623 Surfer’s Walk of Fame Plaques Recommendation to replace with railing mounted system. Sample plate layout Stainless steel Sample mounting locationsPage 579 of 1126 Discussion Key Considerations 1. Completion of the current round of High Priority Repairs to the Pier as part of CIP 623. Project must be completed within 1 to 2 years to avoid further weight restrictions, potential closure(s). 2. Replacement of Surfer’s Walk of Fame plaques as part of CIP 623. CIP 623 can replace plaques with low-cost option to allow program to continue. Other options would advance as a separate effort. Page 580 of 1126 Discussion Key Considerations 3. Consideration of replacement versus continued repair Continue repairing the existing Pier will require funding increasingly costly repairs while deterioration accelerates. Council direction on timing if/when to start planning and Environmental process (lengthy 6-8 years before start of construction.) Optimal time to replace is 2032 saving the City over $100M (required decision by end of 2026). Deferring decision to replace in 2036 will require funding $4M in FY 27-28 for repairs in 2030. Page 581 of 1126 Recommendation 1.Determine that the high priority structural repairs and, removal, and replacement of the Surfer’s Walk of Fame Plaques Project (Project) as part of CIP 623 is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities); 2.Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption within 5 business days; 3.Direct staff to complete the high priority repairs to the Municipal Pier (“Pier”) as part of CIP Project 623; 4.Direct staff to replace the Surfer’s Walk of Fame plaques with the railing-mounted option as part of CIP 623; and 5.Provide staff with direction on whether to begin the planning and environmental review process for a proposed replacement project. Page 582 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 13 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-AS-023 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2025-26 (Finance Manager Henry Chao) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Approve the revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations, budget transfers and fund balances as shown herein and in the attached Projected Change in Financial Position (Attachment 1) and the Midyear Budget Amendment (Attachment 2); 2. Approve the following transactions from the General Fund: a) Appropriate $548,007 of assigned fund balance from the Midyear Budget Review 2025-26 to cover the $548,007 unassigned fund balance shortfall; b) Transfer $317,833 of unspent funds from 2024-25 actuals to the Insurance Fund to bring the up to the funding goal of $3.0 million; c) Assign the estimated remaining $2,239,276 of unspent funds from 2024 -25 actuals to the assigned fund balance category; 3. Receive and file the City Council Travel Summary (Attachment 3); and 4. Provide direction to staff on whether to continue or discontinue the City’s participation in the Beach Cities Transit (BCT) Line 109 agreement currently funded by Fund 145 Proposition A funds, given increasing subsidy requests, ongoing structural cost pressures, and insufficient ridership data to evaluate Hermosa Beach-specific benefits. Executive Summary: This report is to present the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025–26 Midyear Budget Review. With an estimated General Fund revenue increase of $552,347, an overall increase of expenditures of $1,835,257, and adjustments to the General Fund’s fund balance reserves, a budget shortfall of $548,007 is projected by the end of the current 2026 Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2026. Amount FY 23 Prop A Fund Exchange $ 48,211 FY 25 Midyear to FY 26 Budget $ 169,305 Compensated Absences $ 143,839 One-Time Assigned Funds to FY 26 Budget $ 361,355 A Amended Estimated Revenue $ 55,560,894 Page 583 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 13 Midyear Requested Adjustments $ 552,347 Total Estimated Revenue $ 56,113,241 B Amended Operating Appropriations $ 53,399,340 Transfers Out $ 1,788,006 Midyear Requested Adjustments $ 1,835,257 Total Estimated Operating Appropriations $ 57,022,603 C Projected FY 2026 Ending Shortfall 6/30/2026 $ (548,007) D=A+B+C FY 26 Budget to FY 26 Midyear $ 235,594 FY 25 Year End Stabilization Contingency $ 312,413 One-Time Midyear Assigned Funds to Budget $ 548,007 E Projected FY 26 Ending Balance after Appropriating One-Time Midyear Assigned Funds $ - D + E Staff recommends using one-time assigned balances of $235,594 from the FY 26 Budget to FY 26 Midyear from budget savings from the eliminated Deputy City Manager position. For the remainder of the $312,413 shortfall, Staff is recommending using the assigned FY 2025 Year End Stabilization Contingency from the Proposition A / General Fund Exchange Assignment Agreement with the City of West Hollywood. Staff also recommends transferring $317,833 of unspent 2024-25 funds to bring the Insurance Fund beginning FY 2026 fund balance to its funding goal of $3.0 million and assign the estimated remaining unspent $2,239,276 to the assigned fund balance category for the upcoming FY 2026-27 City Budget. Background: The City has conducted an annual Midyear Budget Review since fiscal year 1981 –82. It is customary to conduct a thorough analysis of all estimated revenues and appropriations at the end of the first six (6) months of the fiscal year. All revisions would be recorded as of January 31, 2025 so that midyear revisions for revenue and appropriations would reflect in the 2025–26 Budget worksheets used for preparation of the 2026–27 Budget. The City Council Conference/Travel Summary was requested by City Council in 2014–15 and continues to be provided as an information item (Attachment 3). On June 10, 2025, Council approved the assignment agreement with the City of West Hollywood to exchange expiring Proposition A Local Return Funds for $560,000 of General Fund dollars that otherwise would be returned to the County. The $560,000 of Page 584 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 13 General Fund money from the exchange along with $100,000 of identified FY 25 budget savings for a total of $660,000 was set aside for future City expenditures and use. On June 24, 2025, Council approved and adopted the Fiscal Year 2025–26 budget. The Deputy City Manager position was eliminated in the budget and recommended that the salary and benefits of the position totaling $235,594 be set aside for Midyear review. General Fund Revenues: Amended Budget to Date Requested Budget Amendment Revised Budget % Change Property Taxes $ 26,750,921 $ (158,305) $ 26,592,616 -0.6% Sales Taxes $ 3,686,000 $ (46,000) $ 3,640,000 -1.3% Utility User's Tax $ 2,502,252 $ 10,792 $ 2,513,044 0.4% Transient Occupancy Tax $ 5,190,000 $ - $ 5,190,000 0.0% Other Taxes $ 2,822,559 $ (4,074) $ 2,818,485 -0.1% Licenses and Permits $ 1,145,946 $ (87,355) $ 1,058,591 -7.6% Fines and Forfeitures $ 2,001,500 $ - $ 2,001,500 0.0% Use of Money & Property $ 1,700,765 $ (50,284) $ 1,650,481 -2.9% Intergovernmental / State $ 153,414 $ - $ 153,414 0.0% Current Service Charges $ 9,691,637 $ 757,573 $ 10,449,210 7.8% Other Revenue $ 68,200 $ 130,000 $ 198,200 190.6% Total Revenue $ 55,713,194 $ 552,347 $ 56,265,541 1.0% Transfers-in $ 361,054 $ 175,112 $ 536,166 48.5% It is requested that the City’s General Fund estimated revenue budget be increased by $552,347. The following is a brief description of the changes recommended. Property Taxes The estimate for overall property tax revenue decreased by 0.6 percent. The midyear estimates for the secured portion of the property tax or “real property”, which is land and personal property located upon that property of the same owner is 1.89 percent lower than the original estimate. The new estimate of Current Year Secured is $21,383,348. The slight decrease is due to a projected higher delinquency payment rate and successful valuation appeals in the prior fiscal year. Sales Taxes Page 585 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 13 The recommended $46,000 decrease in Sales Taxes reflects the most recent estimates received from HdL Companies, the City’s sales tax consultant. Increases are projected for State & County Pools and Restaurants & Hotels, which is the largest industry group for sales tax in Hermosa Beach. This is offset by decreases primarily due to lower projected Food & Drugs and Auto Sales tax estimates. Utility User Tax (UUT) UUT is projected to slightly increase 0.4 percent from the original budget, attributable to the costs of electricity. The City will continue to monitor Wired Telecom and Cable TV UUT revenue as residents “cut the cord” in favor of more cost-effective wireless telecom services and continue switching from Cable TV to streaming for their video services. Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) TOT receipts for the first half (through November) are consistent with the original budget, therefore no change is recommended. Other Taxes The small decrease of $4,074 is projected based on historical analysis of the Prop 172 Sales & Use Tax. Proposition 172 is a voter-approved 0.5% statewide sales tax dedicated to funding local public safety services, including police, fire, and criminal justice operations. Licenses & Permits This category decreased by 7.6 percent, primarily du e to decreases in electric and plumbing permits due to current market conditions. This is offset by a projected increase in building permits based on actual building permit revenues from the first half of the fiscal year. Fines and Forfeitures This category was increased by $450,000 earlier in September 2025 for anticipated increases in parking violation penalty revenue from the updated parking violation bail schedule. Revenue is consistent with the amended budget, therefore no change is recommended. Use of Money & Property This net decrease of $50,284 is primarily due to a decrease of $45,500 in Community Center Rentals. Community Center Rentals are lower than expected from the closure of Kelly Courts resulting in less pickleball reservations and adjusting anticipated revenue from the Clark Building due to the delay in reopening. Intergovernmental/State Estimated reimbursement claims are consistent with the original budget, therefore no change is recommended. Page 586 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 13 Current Service Charges This category is projected to increase 7.8 percent from the original budget. The largest increase is from the updated meter rates adopted earlier in October 2025. Staff is anticipating an approximate $635,000 increase in parking meter revenue th is fiscal year. This is followed by a projected increase of $240,000 in plan-check fees based on activity from the first half of the year. Increases are offset by a $50,000 decrease in Other Recreation Programs due to lower than anticipated PARK After School Program enrollment. This is followed by a decrease of approximately $48,000 in Police Towing fees due to decreased activity from the first half of the year. Current Service Revenue comprises multiple fee-for-service streams that fluctuate based on customer demand and activity levels. Other Revenue The recommended $130,000 increase is due to recognizing a one -time $100,000 reimbursement for City Administration costs from the 2025 Bond Issuance for the Greenwich Village North Undergrounding Utilities Assessment District. General Fund Expenditures: Amended Budget Requested Budget Amendment Revised Budget % Change Labor Non-Labor Approp. Legislative $ 1,855,578 $ 37,577 $ 200,000 $ 2,093,155 12.8% Mgmt. Sup. $ 6,046,606 $ 151,853 $ 74,275 $ 6,272,734 3.7% Prospect. Exp. $ 98,580 $ - $ 101,420 $ 200,000 102.9% Police $ 21,915,685 $ 913,178 $ 12,485 $ 22,841,648 4.2% Fire $ 8,130,532 $ - $ - $ 8,130,532 0.0% Public Works $ 10,294,183 $ 162,822 $ 12,014 $10,469,019 1.7% Com. Dev. $ 2,962,770 $ (163,110) $ 157,000 $ 2,956,660 -0.2% Parks & Rec. $ 2,551,857 $ 175,743 $ - $ 2,727,600 6.9% Total Expenditures $ 53,855,791 $1,278,063 $ 557,194 $ 55,691,048 3.4% PEG Funds $ 9,130 $ - $ - $ 9,130 0.0% Transfers-out $ 1,918,535 $ - $ 317,833 $ 2,236,368 16.6% Capital Outlay $ - $ - $ 550,000 $ 550,000 - % Staff recommends increasing the City’s operating General Fund expenditures by $1,835,257. The $1.3 million increase in personnel costs is due to projected labor Page 587 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 6 of 13 increases in salaries and benefits from the recently negotiated Memorandum of Understanding (MOUs) with the City Employee Bargaining Units earlier this fiscal year. The remainder of the approximate $557,000 increase is primarily due to recommended increases in contract services. Each City Department reviewed their budgets in detail and identified where savings could be realized but also requested increases as the decreases made to balance the budget were not all sustainable. Legislative Staff recommends increasing the City Attorney budget by $200,000 from $480,000 to $680,000 due to activity from the first half of the year. Management Support Staff recommends increasing the Revenue Services contract services budget by $60,000 for 3rd party collection fees due to an increase in parking citations. This cost is mainly offset by increased collection efforts with the City’s new citation vendor. After identifying savings by releasing both the training budget for the eliminated Deputy City Manager position and the 3rd Party Facilitator for City Manager Evaluation, staff is recommending increasing the City Manager budget by a net $9,275 to fund a Parking and a Downtown Lot A study. The Finance Administration Division labor is increased $5,050 for a staff promotion from Senior Account Clerk to Administrative Assistant. The promotion is to provide overlap and assume duties from the current Administrative Assistant that is retiring in July 202 6. Management Support – Prospective Expenditures Staff recommends replenishing the prospective expenditures for $98,580 to cover unanticipated expenses for the remainder of the fiscal year. This was originally adopted to be budgeted for $200,000 but was primarily used this Fiscal Year to cover department needs including the Council approved CSG Consultant amendment, the City Manager Executive Recruitment, Recreation Management software implementation expenses, and the Xanadu Janitorial Service contract. Public Safety – Police The $925,663 increase in the Police budget is primarily due to a projected approximately $913,000 increase in labor costs from the recently negotiated and approved MOUs. Staff is also recommending an adjustment for $6,000 to the Office Operating Supplies budget for computer chairs after ergonomic tests and an increase of $6,485 to Contract Services for shooting range budget expenditures. The range budget expenditures will be Page 588 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 7 of 13 offset by an equal $6,485 reimbursement for firearms the Police Department are selling back to a manufacturer. Public Safety – Fire Contracted Fire Services are consistent with the original budget, therefore no change is recommended. Public Works Staff is recommending adjustments of $4,014 to the Downtown Enhancement Division and $8,000 of anticipated repair and maintenance supplies for the Public Works Yard division. Community Development The labor decrease of $163,110 is primarily due to adjusting the pension allocations from former Community Development department staff to the current department staff. This offsets a recommended increase of $157,000 to the Community Development Contract Services budget. The increase is due to $50,000 for contracted plan review services and a contracted permit technician of $60,000 to support ongoing Accela activation and meet state mandated reporting requirements. Staff also recommends an increase of $37,000 for the City match for the South Bay Regional Housing Trust Joint Powers Agreement that was approved by Council earlier on March 10, 2026 and $10,000 to the training budget for ongoing required departmental training. Parks/Recreation (Community Resources) Staff has no changes with the operating appropriations budget at Midyear. Public, Educational, and Governmental Access (PEG) Funds Staff has no change to the PEG funds budget and will revisit as part of the upcoming FY 2026-27 Budget Cycle. Transfers In / Transfers Out Staff is recommending a transfer in of $175,112 from completed legacy assessment redemption funds to the General Fund assigned fund balance category for prior City administrative costs. Staff is also recommending a transfer out of $317,833 from unspent 2024-25 funds to bring the Insurance Fund beginning FY 2026 fund balance to its funding goal of $3.0 million. Capital Outlay from Donations Staff is requesting an appropriation of $550,000 from the restricted fund balance category of donations for two General Fund Capital Improvement Projects (CIP). Page 589 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 8 of 13 CIP 111 – Sheldon Donation The $500,000 of Chuck and Missy Sheldon donation is requested to be budgeted for a monument signage. CIP 112 – Chamber of Commerce Donation The $50,000 of the Chamber of Commerce Marquee Donation is requested to be budgeted for a marquee sign. Available Funds After the recommended budget revisions, a shortfall of $548,007 is reflected in the General Fund. Staff recommends addressing the shortfall by appropriating the balance of $235,594 from Fiscal Year 2026 Adopted Budget savings due to the elimination of the Deputy City Manager position. For the remainder of the $312,413 shortfall, Staff is recommending appropriating the assigned FY 2025 Year End Stabilization Contingency from the Proposition A / General Fund Exchange Assignment Agreement with the City of West Hollywood. Other Funds: Adjustments to both estimated revenues and appropriations are proposed for the City’s other funds (excluding the Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) fund, which will be addressed in the following section). Revenue adjustments to other funds are due to an increase in interest revenue from City deposits held longer in pooled investments until usage. Appropriation adjustments are due to updated salary and benefit cost allocations at other funds where budgeted. The major adjustments are explained below. 115 State Gas Tax Fund Staff is releasing $60,200 of CIP 105 Annual Street Improvements back to the Gas Tax Fund as the project is completed. 116 TDA 3 (Transportation Development Act) Fund Staff is releasing $18,000 of CIP 193 Pedestrian Crossing Safe ty Improvements back to the TDA fund since the project was completed in the prior fiscal year. 122 Tyco Fund Staff is releasing approximately $191,300 of CIP 105 Annual Street Improvements and $3,000 of CIP 502 Greenbelt Pedestrian Trail back to the Tyco Fund as both projects are completed. Page 590 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 9 of 13 145 Proposition A Fund Staff is releasing a net total of $782,000 back to the Proposition A Fund as the $800,000 Fund Exchange with the City of West Hollywood occurred in the last month of the prior 2025 fiscal year. This is offset by budgeting an additional $18,000 for the Valley Park Day Camp excursions. Beach Cities Transit Line 109 (145 Proposition A Fund) The City of Hermosa Beach has participated in the Beach Cities Transit (BCT) Line 109 agreement since 2006, with minimal subsidy requirements until FY 2025–26, when BCT requested $17,183 due to rising operating costs. For FY 2026–27, BCT is requesting $19,761, reflecting the City’s 10.89% cost share. Operating costs are expected to continue increasing due to structural cost pressures and flat ridership, which is likely to result in higher future subsidy requests from all partner agencies. In FY 2025–26, staff amended the agreement to require enhanced ridership reporting. However, farebox data received to date is approximately 70% incomplete and insufficient for meaningful analysis of Hermosa Beach usage. 147 Measure R Fund Staff is releasing $18,354 of CIP 105 Annual Street Improvements back to the Measure R Fund as the project is completed. 150 Grants Fund The estimated revenue is updated to increase $510,000 for the Grants Fund. The increase is to recognize $460,000 in reimbursements for Municipal Pier Repair CIP 629 and CIP 660 that was completed two years prior in Fiscal Year 2024. The remainder $50,000 is due to recognition of reimbursement revenue from CalRecycle for CIP 105 Annual Street improvements in the prior fiscal year. 160 Sewer Fund Staff is updating the CIP 421 Annual Sewer Improvements Phase II budget from $3,865,610 to $1,765,884 to recognize activity completed in the prior fiscal year 2025. 190 RTI Undersea Cable Fund & 191 Tidelands Undersea Cable Fund The installation of the 4th easement cable has been delayed to next fiscal year. Staff is releasing $96,202 and $95,000 of CIP 695 Parking Lot A Improvements in the RTI Undersea and RTI Tideland funds respectively. 705 Insurance Fund Staff has updated the estimated revenue by approximately $108,000 for insurance reimbursements received this year. Page 591 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 10 of 13 Staff is also reclassing $100,000 of available budget within the Insurance Fund from General Liability Claims to cover year end projected Workers Compensation Claims. Although the projected ending fund balance for the Insurance Fund is approximately $2.85 million with the estimated revenue increase and the $317,833 transfer in from unspent 2024-25 funds, staff is anticipating actual General Liability Claims expenditure to be less than budgeted. Staff recommends no changes due to the uncertainty of insurance claims for the remainder of the fiscal year and will revisit as part of the upcoming FY 2026- 27 Budget Cycle. 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Staff is requesting an additional $181,000 of appropriations offset by approximately $21,000 in updated salary and benefit cost allocations. For Information Technology, this includes $21,535 for Cycle 8 of the Los Angeles Regional Imagery Acquisition Consortium (LARIAC). LARIAC will provide digital aerial imagery used by the City for project planning, plan review and other critical processes. Staff is also requesting an additional $2,550 to upgrade the Community Center Conference room to hold virtual meetings. The Police Department is requesting $35,000 to equip all Police Vehicles and Community Service Officer (CSO) Vehicles with Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs). Other Police Department equipment requests include $3,400 to equip all CSO vehicles with medical kits, $6,000 for 40mm less lethal mounts in Police Department vehicles and $5,900 to equip Axon Kits for 2 Chevy Tahoe’s. Staff is also requesting an additional $106,600 to purchase 2 Ford Explorers and related outfitting costs for Police Administration staff. The two Ford Explorers will replace two 2014 Ford Fusion Hybrid S vehicles to be auctioned. Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) The originally adopted CIP budget for FY 2025-26 was $33,944,125, consisting of 36 projects that are either directly charged to their funding source or to the 301 Capital Improvement Project Fund. The total net change to the Capital Improvement Fund is an increase of $1,438,840 to bring the projected ending CIP Fund balance to $1,664,275. This is primarily due to the actual costs of completed CIP projects being lower than budgeted and releasing $1,274,184 of project budget back to the CIP Fund. St aff is also updating the CIP Fund estimated revenue by $164,656 to recognize additional interest revenue received this fiscal year. Page 592 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 11 of 13 The release of completed project budgets frees up funding for necessary City projects anticipated in the upcoming next fiscal year budget cycle. In this midyear budget review, the budgets for the following CIP projects are recommended to be released back to the CIP fund as the projects are nearing completion or completed. 109 Utility Box Wrappings Staff recommends releasing $7,200 back to the CIP fund. 502 Greenbelt Pedestrian Trail Staff recommends releasing $25,702 back to the CIP fund. 603 South Park Slope, Irrigation and Landscape Improvements Staff recommends releasing $1,080,630 back to the CIP fund to amend ca rryforward and release remaining budget. The project was completed earlier this fiscal year. 604 City Wide ADA Improvements Staff recommends releasing $288,692 back to the CIP fund. 605 City Facilities Condition and Needs Assessment Staff recommends releasing $346,530 back to the CIP fund. 617 Civic Center Charging Stations Staff recommends releasing $49,130 back to the CIP fund. 633 Base 3 Electrical Improvements Staff recommends releasing $200,000 back to the CIP fund. 689 Clark Building Renovations Staff recommends releasing $200,000 back to the CIP fund. In this mid-year budget review, appropriations are recommended from the CIP fund for the following projects. 615 New Corporate Yard Facilities Staff recommends appropriating the remaining $889,278 set aside as a CIP Fund reserve balance for the City Yard Construction to cover anticipated expenditures for the remainder of the Fiscal Year. 619 Kelly Court Improvements Staff recommends appropriating an additional $51,403 to the CIP proj ect to maintain proper construction inspection coverage and compliance with labor regulations. Page 593 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 12 of 13 Fiscal Impact: With a $548,007 projected structural General Fund shortfall after midyear adjustments, staff is recommending using one-time savings of $235,594 from the eliminated Deputy City Manager position and $312,413 of FY 25 Stabilization Contingency from the Proposition A fund exchange to balance the FY 26 budget. The City has used one-time savings and measures to manage structural City budget deficits to create a balanced budget. The Fiscal Year 2025–2026 budget was balanced in part by using $361,355 in one -time funds from the City’s General Fund. These funds came from several sources, including the FY 2023 Prop A exchange, savings identified during the previous year’s midyear review, and funds set aside for employee leave obligations. In this Midyear update, the City is projected to increase expected General Fund revenues by $552,347. At the same time, planned spending is projected to rise by $1,835,257 to address operational needs. These adjustments were carefully made to help the City manage ongoing financial challenges while continuing to provide essential services to the community, even as costs rise and economic conditions remain uncertain. Overall, a total of $909,362 in one-time funds was used to balance the FY 2026 budget. On June 24, 2025 during the budget adoption, the below five -year forecast was presented; Page 594 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 13 of 13 Given ongoing fiscal uncertainty, staff projects structural deficits in the upcoming fiscal years, driven by expenditures outpacing anticipated revenues. Contributing factors include rising costs associated with departmental contract service negotiations, as well as pending service agreements with the Los Angeles County Fire Department fo r fire protection, beach operations, and lifeguard services. Additional fiscal pressures include the need to replenish the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Fund to support critical infrastructure projects that maintain community safety and service levels. The City must also address unanticipated expense increases, which may include rising contract service costs, infrastructure and maintenance needs, legal liabilities, personnel and benefit cost increases, and fluctuations in fuel, utility, and other operational expenses. In light of these economic uncertainties, staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed General Fund transactions and appropriate the estimated remaining balance of $2,239,276 in unspent FY 2024–25 funds to support the development of the FY 2026–27 budget. Attachments: 1. Projected Change in Financial Position 2. Midyear Budget Amendment 3. City Council Travel Summary Respectfully Submitted by: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Concur: Charlotte Newkirk, Senior Finance Analyst Noted for Fiscal Impact: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 595 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Projected Change in Financial Position Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Fund # Fund Beginning Fund Balance 07/01/2025 Fund Balance Reclass Estimated Revenues Midyear Request Operating Appropriations Transfers In / (Transfers Out) Capital Appropriations Midyear Request Projected Fund Balance 06/30/2026 General Fund 001 Unassigned -$ 909,362$ 55,560,894$ 552,347$ 53,399,340$ (1,788,006)$ -$ 1,835,257$ -$ 001 Assigned - FY23 Prop A Fund Exchange 430,683$ (48,211)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 382,472$ 001 Assigned - FY25 Midyear to FY26 Budget 169,305$ (169,305)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 001 Assigned - FY25 Year End Stabilization Contingency 660,000$ (312,413)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 347,587$ 001 Assigned - FY26 Budget to FY26 Midyear 235,594$ (235,594)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 001 Assigned - FY25 Reappropriations to FY26 242,336$ -$ -$ -$ 242,336$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 001 Assigned - FY25 Actuals to FY 26 Insurance Fund 317,833$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (317,833)$ -$ -$ -$ 001 Assigned - FY25 Year End Actuals to FY 27 2,239,276$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,239,276$ 001 Assigned - Reserve for FEMA Claims 926,345$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 926,345$ 001 Assigned - City Administrative Costs -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 175,112$ -$ -$ 175,112$ 001 Assigned - Contingencies 10,560,684$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 86,686$ -$ -$ 10,647,370$ 001 Assigned - Retirement Trust 829,060$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 829,060$ 001 Assigned - Compensated Absences 294,170$ (143,839)$ -$ -$ -$ 143,839$ -$ -$ 294,170$ 001 Committed - In Lieu Fee/Parking Facility 404,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 404,600$ 001 Nonspendable 1,102,048$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,102,048$ 001 Restricted - CASp Fees 6,279$ -$ 7,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 14,079$ 001 Restricted - General Plan 362,273$ -$ 94,000$ -$ 214,115$ -$ -$ -$ 242,158$ 001 Restricted - Chamber Marquee Donation 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ 001 Restricted - Sheldon Donation *500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ 001 Restricted - Nuisance Abatement Restrooms 10,075$ -$ 10,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,575$ 001 Restricted - PEG Funds 225,599$ -$ 40,000$ -$ -$ -$ 9,130$ -$ 256,469$ 001 Restricted - Section 115 Pension Trust 1,021,575$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,021,575$ Total General Fund 20,587,735$ -$ 55,713,194$ 552,347$ 53,855,791$ (1,700,202)$ 9,130$ 2,385,257$ 18,902,896$ Special Revenue Funds 105 Lighting & Landscaping Fund 25,083$ -$ 868,414$ -$ 870,971$ -$ -$ 25,804$ (3,278)$ 115 State Gas Tax Fund 342,582$ -$ 1,123,501$ -$ 150,000$ (350,000)$ 866,094$ (52,247)$ 152,236$ 116 TDA 3 (Transportation Development Act) Fund -$ -$ 15,257$ -$ -$ -$ 33,257$ (18,000)$ -$ 117 AB 939 Fund 161,168$ -$ 68,773$ 630$ 45,273$ -$ -$ -$ 185,298$ 121 Prop A Open Space Fund (141,086)$ -$ 18,000$ 47,616$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (75,470)$ 122 Tyco Fund 1,927,219$ -$ 313,702$ 6,890$ -$ -$ 2,327,445$ (194,336)$ 114,702$ 125 Parks / Recreation Facility Tax Fund 338,688$ -$ 119,193$ -$ -$ -$ 399,193$ (9,597)$ 68,285$ 135 Bayview Drive District Admin Expense Fund 7,008$ -$ 194$ (194)$ 1,900$ -$ -$ -$ 5,108$ 138 Loma District Admin Expense Fund -$ -$ 1$ (1)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 139 Beach Drive District Assessment Admin Fund 1,503$ -$ 106$ (106)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,503$ 140 CDBG Grant Fund 3,192$ -$ 184,000$ -$ -$ -$ 184,000$ -$ 3,192$ 145 Proposition A Fund 105,343$ -$ 511,919$ -$ 955,942$ -$ -$ (785,865)$ 447,185$ 146 Proposition C Fund 787,857$ -$ 424,152$ 11,409$ 372,502$ -$ 745,465$ (2,924)$ 108,375$ 147 Measure R Fund 376,902$ -$ 314,157$ 907$ 1,687$ -$ 683,684$ (16,326)$ 22,921$ 148 Measure M Fund 17,746$ -$ 355,705$ -$ -$ -$ 398,705$ -$ (25,254)$ 149 Measure W Fund 683,494$ -$ 158,305$ 26,550$ 23,449$ -$ 367,632$ (1,963)$ 479,231$ 150 Grants Fund (622,909)$ -$ 2,526,131$ 510,000$ 1,206,728$ -$ 1,041,795$ -$ 164,699$ 152 AQMD Fund 136,679$ -$ 25,575$ 3,369$ -$ 15,000$ -$ 150,623$ 153 Supple. Law Enforce. Services (SLESF) Fund 508,582$ -$ 161,191$ 6,262$ 126,133$ -$ -$ -$ 549,902$ 157 FEMA / CAL OES Fund (651,475)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (651,475)$ 160 Sewer Fund 2,972,990$ -$ 1,316,714$ 31,527$ 15,000$ -$ 4,876,613$ (2,155,002)$ 1,584,620$ 161 Storm Drain Fund 2,592,166$ -$ 50,052$ 62,115$ 905,870$ 700,000$ 1,197,245$ (41,073)$ 1,342,291$ 170 Asset Seizure Fund 513,286$ -$ 141,088$ 14,166$ 111,177$ -$ -$ -$ 557,363$ 180 Fire Protection Fund 12,208$ -$ 4,265$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 16,473$ 190 RTI Undersea Cable Fund 1,087,259$ -$ 276,186$ -$ 84,993$ -$ 1,221,656$ (101,776)$ 158,572$ Attachment 1Page 596 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Projected Change in Financial Position Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Fund # Fund Beginning Fund Balance 07/01/2025 Fund Balance Reclass Estimated Revenues Midyear Request Operating Appropriations Transfers In / (Transfers Out) Capital Appropriations Midyear Request Projected Fund Balance 06/30/2026 191 RTI Tidelands Undersea Cable Fund 373,122$ -$ 12,600$ -$ -$ 367,007$ (95,000)$ 113,715$ Total Special Revenue Funds 11,558,607$ -$ 8,989,181$ 721,140$ 4,871,625$ 350,000$ 14,724,791$ (3,448,305)$ 5,470,817$ Debt Service Funds 201 Lease Revenue Bond Fund 40,857$ -$ -$ -$ 728,200$ 728,200$ -$ -$ 40,857$ Total Debt Service Funds 40,857$ -$ -$ -$ 728,200$ 728,200$ -$ -$ 40,857$ Capital Projects Funds 301 Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Fund 10,422,300$ 841,393$ 285,909$ 164,656$ 336,195$ -$ 11,877,250$ (2,163,462)$ 1,664,275$ 301 CIP Fund - Reserved for City Yard Construction 1,889,278$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 889,278$ -$ 301 CIP Fund - Reserved for Capital Facilities 841,393$ (841,393)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Capital Improvement Project Fund 13,152,971$ -$ 285,909$ 164,656$ 336,195$ -$ 12,877,250$ (1,274,184)$ 1,664,275$ 313 Greenwich Village Utility Undergrounding 58,572$ -$ 4,031,600$ -$ 4,031,600$ -$ -$ -$ 58,572$ Total Capital Projects Funds 13,211,543$ -$ 4,317,509$ 164,656$ 4,367,795$ -$ 12,877,250$ (1,274,184)$ 1,722,847$ Agency Funds 609 Bayview Drive District Redemption Fund 9,507$ 17,590$ 1,842$ (1,842)$ -$ (27,097)$ -$ -$ -$ 610 Lower Pier District Redemption Fund 3,550$ -$ 96$ (96)$ -$ (3,550)$ -$ -$ -$ 611 Beach Drive Redemption Fund 2,294$ -$ 385$ (385)$ -$ (2,294)$ -$ -$ -$ 612 Beach Drive Reserve Fund 5,214$ -$ 141$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,355$ 617 Myrtle Avenue Assessment Fund 52,131$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (52,131)$ -$ -$ -$ 618 Loma Drive Assessment Fund 90,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (90,040)$ -$ -$ -$ 619 Bayview Drive District Reserve Fund 17,590$ (17,590)$ 463$ (463)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 623 Greenwich Underground Reserve Fund -$ 58,405$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 58,405$ 624 Greenwich Underground Redemption Fund -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Agency Funds 180,326$ 58,405$ 2,927$ (2,786)$ -$ (175,112)$ -$ -$ 63,760$ Internal Service Funds 705 Insurance Fund 2,682,117$ -$ 4,338,529$ 107,754$ 4,668,545$ 317,833$ -$ (70,178)$ 2,847,866$ 715 Equipment Replacement Fund (ERF)7,275,043$ -$ 1,760,436$ -$ 3,363,266$ -$ 630,133$ 159,575$ 4,882,505$ 715 ERF - Investment in Fixed Assets 2,789,447$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,789,447$ 715 ERF - Designated Building Maintenance Funds 553,394$ -$ 102,557$ -$ -$ -$ 122,000$ -$ 533,951$ 715 ERF - Records Technology Fee 812,430$ -$ 90,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 902,430$ 715 ERF - Assigned Reserve - Accounting ERP 333,645$ -$ -$ -$ 333,645$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Equipment Replacement Fund 11,430,314$ -$ 1,952,993$ -$ 3,696,911$ -$ 752,133$ 159,575$ 9,108,333$ Total Internal Service Funds 14,112,431$ -$ 6,291,522$ 107,754$ 8,365,456$ 317,833$ 752,133$ 89,397$ 11,956,199$ Total 59,691,499$ 58,405$ 75,314,333$ 1,543,111$ 72,188,867$ (479,281)$ 28,363,304$ (2,247,835)$ 38,157,376$ * Donation accepted on 12/9/2025. Attachment 1Page 597 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach Midyear Budget Amendment For Fiscal Year 2025-26 Fund # Fund Name Account Code Function Account Name Amended Budget Midyear Request Revised Budget Type 001 General Fund 001-3101 Property Tax Current Year Secured 21,794,716$ (411,368)$ 21,383,348$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3102 Property Tax Current Year Unsecured 683,333$ (5,247)$ 678,086$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3103 Property Tax Prior Year Collections -$ 214,000$ 214,000$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3108 Sales Tax Sales Tax 3,686,000$ (46,000)$ 3,640,000$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3109 Other Taxes 1/2 Cent Sales Tx Ext 292,616$ (4,074)$ 288,542$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3120 UUT Utility User Tax 2,502,252$ 10,792$ 2,513,044$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3122 Property Tax Property tax In-lieu of Veh Lic Fees 3,972,872$ 44,310$ 4,017,182$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3204 Licenses & Permits Building Permits 650,000$ 40,000$ 690,000$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3205 Licenses & Permits Electric Permits 199,500$ (59,500)$ 140,000$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3206 Licenses & Permits Plumbing Permits 147,000$ (67,000)$ 80,000$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3236 Licenses & Permits Drone Permit Fee 2,330$ (855)$ 1,475$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3404 Use of Money & Property Community Center Leases 34,184$ (4,784)$ 29,400$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3405 Use of Money & Property Community Center Rentals 379,500$ (45,500)$ 334,000$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3813 Current Service Charges Plan Check Fees 320,000$ 240,000$ 560,000$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3817 Current Service Charges Address Change Request Fee 6,575$ (2,075)$ 4,500$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3818 Current Service Charges Police Services 420$ 19,020$ 19,440$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3821 Current Service Charges Daily Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 11,000$ 4,800$ 15,800$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3841 Current Service Charges Police Towing 164,948$ (47,948)$ 117,000$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3845 Current Service Charges Lot A Revenue 800,000$ 488,376$ 1,288,376$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3865 Current Service Charges Lot B Revenue 193,100$ 147,000$ 340,100$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3867 Current Service Charges Precise Development Plans 44,157$ (27,221)$ 16,936$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3894 Current Service Charges Other Recreation Programs 193,799$ (50,000)$ 143,799$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3903 Other Revenue Contributions Non Govt -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3914 Other Revenue Planning EIR Admin Reimbursement 10,000$ 30,000$ 40,000$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-6810 Current Service Charges Deed Restriction/Covenant Review 20,800$ (13,720)$ 7,080$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-6811 Current Service Charges Landscape Plan Review 5,370$ (2,685)$ 2,685$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-6821 Current Service Charges Solar Plan Check/Inspection 5,040$ 14,960$ 20,000$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-6825 Current Service Charges Clean Bay Restaurant - NPDES Inspection -$ 15,483$ 15,483$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-6828 Current Service Charges Public Improvement Plan Check 51,000$ 9,000$ 60,000$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-6849 Current Service Charges Traffic Plan Review -$ 2,250$ 2,250$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-6881 Current Service Charges Public Tree Removal Permit 500$ 500$ 1,000$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-6883 Current Service Charges Short-term Vacation Rental Permit 33,518$ (20,358)$ 13,160$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-6890 Current Service Charges Outdoor Dining Encroachments 604,000$ (19,809)$ 584,191$ Revenue 001 General Fund 001-3955 Transfers In - Assigned Assigned - City Administrative Costs -$ 172,112$ 172,112$ Transfer In 001 General Fund 001-1101-4102 Legislative Regular Salaries 53,958$ 2,777$ 56,735$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1101-4111 Legislative Accrual Cash In 3,368$ (1,230)$ 2,138$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1101-4112 Legislative Part Time/Temporary 50,880$ -$ 50,880$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1101-4180 Legislative Retirement 55,852$ 5,050$ 60,902$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1101-4188 Legislative Employee Benefits 63,571$ 3,108$ 66,679$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1101-4189 Legislative Medicare Benefits 1,520$ 76$ 1,596$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1121-4102 Legislative Regular Salaries 386,709$ 461$ 387,170$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1121-4111 Legislative Accrual Cash In 8,978$ 13,669$ 22,647$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1121-4112 Legislative Part Time Temporary -$ 9,733$ 9,733$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1121-4180 Legislative Retirement 32,890$ 9,874$ 42,764$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1121-4188 Legislative Employee Benefits 80,366$ (7,917)$ 72,449$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1121-4189 Legislative Medicare Benefits 5,732$ 334$ 6,066$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1131-4201 Legislative Contract Serv/Private 480,000$ 200,000$ 680,000$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1141-4112 Legislative Part Time/Temporary 6,360$ -$ 6,360$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1141-4180 Legislative Retirement 501$ 23$ 524$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1141-4188 Legislative Employee Benefits 20,791$ 1,619$ 22,410$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1141-4189 Legislative Medicare Benefits 92$ -$ 92$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1101-4201 Management Support Contract Serv/Private 33,000$ (30,000)$ 3,000$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1201-4102 Management Support Regular Salaries 1,143,285$ 1,142$ 1,144,427$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1201-4106 Management Support Regular Overtime 2,209$ (2,209)$ -$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1201-4111 Management Support Accrual Cash In 48,100$ (26,568)$ 21,532$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1201-4112 Management Support Part Time/Temporary -$ 14,880$ 14,880$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1201-4180 Management Support Retirement 148,448$ 15,421$ 163,869$ Expenditure Attachment 2Page 598 of 1126 001 General Fund 001-1201-4188 Management Support Employee Benefits 121,837$ 9,222$ 131,059$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1201-4189 Management Support Medicare Benefits 16,854$ 321$ 17,175$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1201-4201 Management Support Contract Serv/Private 661,468$ 43,200$ 704,668$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1201-4315 Management Support Membership 4,250$ (1,125)$ 3,125$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1201-4317 Management Support Conference/Training 31,030$ (2,800)$ 28,230$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1202-4102 Management Support Regular Salaries 703,396$ 55,435$ 753,781$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1202-4106 Management Support Regular Overtime 4,000$ (2,000)$ 2,000$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1202-4111 Management Support Accrual Cash In 58,825$ (41,987)$ 16,838$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1202-4112 Management Support Part Time/Temporary 109,000$ -$ 109,000$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1202-4180 Management Support Retirement 134,625$ 13,080$ 147,705$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1202-4188 Management Support Employee Benefits 90,489$ 4,585$ 95,074$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1202-4189 Management Support Medicare Benefits 12,087$ 410$ 12,497$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1203-4102 Management Support Regular Salaries 244,187$ 22,316$ 266,503$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1203-4106 Management Support Regular Overtime -$ 161$ 161$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1203-4111 Management Support Accrual Cash In 7,948$ 1,661$ 9,609$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1203-4112 Management Support Part Time Temporary 18,655$ -$ 18,655$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1203-4180 Management Support Retirement 20,768$ (3,238)$ 17,530$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1203-4188 Management Support Employee Benefits 225,659$ 54,769$ 280,428$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1203-4189 Management Support Medicare Benefits 3,548$ 185$ 3,733$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1203-4191 Management Support Instant Bonuses 2,000$ 6,871$ 8,871$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1203-4192 Management Support Signing Bonus 230,000$ -$ 230,000$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1203-4194 Management Support Referral Bonus 12,000$ (12,000)$ -$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1204-4102 Management Support Regular Salaries 526,461$ 25,445$ 551,906$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1204-4106 Management Support Regular Overtime 500$ -$ 500$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1204-4111 Management Support Accrual Cash In 15,880$ (5,537)$ 10,343$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1204-4180 Management Support Retirement 59,509$ 2,666$ 62,175$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1204-4185 Management Support Alternative Retirement System 2$ (2)$ -$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1204-4188 Management Support Employee Benefits 121,937$ 16,122$ 138,059$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1204-4189 Management Support Medicare Benefits 7,661$ 702$ 8,363$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1204-4201 Management Support Contract Serv/Private 125,337$ 60,000$ 185,337$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1204-4304 Management Support Telephone 2,600$ 2,600$ 5,200$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1204-4317 Management Support Conference/Training 2,800$ 2,400$ 5,200$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1214-4322 Prospective Expenditures Unclassified 98,580$ 101,420$ 200,000$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4102 Public Safety - Police Regular Salaries 6,486,698$ 870,018$ 7,356,716$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4105 Public Safety - Police Special Duty Pay 95,007$ 20,083$ 115,090$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4106 Public Safety - Police Regular Overtime 1,142,180$ (18,541)$ 1,123,639$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4111 Public Safety - Police Accrual Cash In 680,553$ (347)$ 680,206$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4112 Public Safety - Police Part Time Temporary -$ 4,654$ 4,654$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4117 Public Safety - Police Shift Differential 3,000$ 9,813$ 12,813$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4118 Public Safety - Police Training Officer 54,000$ (3,937)$ 50,063$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4180 Public Safety - Police Retirement 4,322,834$ 17,080$ 4,339,914$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4184 Public Safety - Police IRC 415(B) Retirement 4,000$ (1,483)$ 2,517$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4185 Public Safety - Police Alternative Retirement System 178$ (178)$ -$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4187 Public Safety - Police Uniform Allowance 41,323$ 1,972$ 43,295$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4188 Public Safety - Police Employee Benefits 964,508$ 2,464$ 966,972$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4189 Public Safety - Police Medicare Benefits 97,050$ 40,529$ 137,579$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4201 Public Safety - Police Contract Serv/Private 368,210$ 6,485$ 374,695$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2101-4305 Public Safety - Police Office Oper Supplies 67,000$ 6,000$ 73,000$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3302-4102 Public Safety - Police Regular Salaries 1,120,224$ 40,026$ 1,160,250$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3302-4106 Public Safety - Police Regular Overtime 92,801$ (39,776)$ 53,025$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3302-4111 Public Safety - Police Accrual Cash In 64,395$ (36,300)$ 28,095$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3302-4112 Public Safety - Police Part Time Temporary 85,487$ (5,773)$ 79,714$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3302-4117 Public Safety - Police Shift Differential 5,000$ (1,424)$ 3,576$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3302-4118 Public Safety - Police Field Training Officer 2,000$ 288$ 2,288$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3302-4180 Public Safety - Police Retirement 491,309$ 17,632$ 508,941$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3302-4187 Public Safety - Police Uniform Allowance 5,280$ 982$ 6,262$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3302-4188 Public Safety - Police Employee Benefits 297,889$ (7,235)$ 290,654$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3302-4189 Public Safety - Police Medicare Benefits 16,331$ 2,631$ 18,962$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-2203-4180 Public Safety - Fire Retirement 1,239,952$ -$ 1,239,952$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3101-4180 Public Works Retirement -$ -$ -$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3104-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 493,576$ 32,877$ 526,453$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3104-4106 Public Works Regular Overtime 20,421$ 25,293$ 45,714$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3104-4111 Public Works Accrual Cash In 44,291$ (18,918)$ 25,373$ Expenditure Attachment 2Page 599 of 1126 001 General Fund 001-3104-4180 Public Works Retirement 234,730$ 12,922$ 247,652$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3104-4187 Public Works Uniform Allowance 1,478$ 366$ 1,844$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3104-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 119,934$ 4,116$ 124,050$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3104-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 6,058$ 1,096$ 7,154$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3301-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 54,746$ 895$ 55,641$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3301-4106 Public Works Regular Overtime 851$ 38$ 889$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3301-4111 Public Works Accrual Cash In 1,058$ 3,602$ 4,660$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3301-4180 Public Works Retirement 14,244$ 1,433$ 15,677$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3301-4187 Public Works Uniform Allowance 82$ 20$ 102$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3301-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 8,973$ 403$ 9,376$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3301-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 775$ 85$ 860$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-3301-4201 Public Works Contract Serv/Private 335,986$ 4,014$ 340,000$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4202-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 913,565$ 6,482$ 920,047$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4202-4106 Public Works Regular Overtime 3,798$ (714)$ 3,084$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4202-4111 Public Works Accrual Cash In 23,253$ 27,539$ 50,792$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4202-4112 Public Works Part Time/Temporary 99,840$ (12,768)$ 87,072$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4202-4180 Public Works Retirement 119,824$ (27,132)$ 92,692$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4202-4185 Public Works Alternative Retirement System 330$ (330)$ -$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4202-4187 Public Works Uniform Allowance 48$ 10$ 58$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4202-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 139,417$ (8,054)$ 131,363$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4202-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 13,766$ 1,284$ 15,050$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4202-4305 Public Works Office Oper Supplies 22,000$ 8,000$ 30,000$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4204-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 471,097$ 14,386$ 485,483$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4204-4106 Public Works Regular Overtime 71,183$ 17,747$ 88,930$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4204-4111 Public Works Accrual Cash In -$ 18,483$ 18,483$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4204-4112 Public Works Part Time Temporary -$ 27,909$ 27,909$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4204-4180 Public Works Retirement 56,106$ 80,034$ 136,140$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4204-4185 Public Works Alternative Retirement System -$ -$ -$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4204-4187 Public Works Uniform Allowance 1,800$ 393$ 2,193$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4204-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 100,345$ (7,510)$ 92,835$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4204-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 6,900$ 2,187$ 9,087$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4204-4190 Public Works Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) -$ -$ -$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-6101-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 392,377$ 25,705$ 418,082$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-6101-4106 Public Works Regular Overtime 3,447$ 21,864$ 25,311$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-6101-4111 Public Works Accrual Cash In 47,414$ (31,528)$ 15,886$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-6101-4180 Public Works Retirement 119,884$ (58,153)$ 61,731$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-6101-4187 Public Works Uniform Allowance 1,152$ 285$ 1,437$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-6101-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 76,187$ (551)$ 75,636$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-6101-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 5,750$ 1,026$ 6,776$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4101-4102 Community Development Regular Salaries 598,818$ 23,194$ 622,012$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4101-4106 Community Development Regular Overtime 5,000$ (5,000)$ -$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4101-4111 Community Development Accrual Cash In 29,087$ (29,087)$ -$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4101-4112 Community Development Part Time/Temporary 20,041$ (760)$ 19,281$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4101-4180 Community Development Retirement 169,327$ (81,726)$ 87,601$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4101-4187 Community Development Uniform Allowance 870$ (570)$ 300$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4101-4188 Community Development Employee Benefits 83,900$ 14,872$ 98,772$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4101-4189 Community Development Medicare Benefits 8,700$ 639$ 9,339$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4201-4102 Community Development Regular Salaries 771,735$ 37,555$ 809,290$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4201-4106 Community Development Regular Overtime 5,536$ (5,536)$ -$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4201-4111 Community Development Accrual Cash In 42,892$ (31,155)$ 11,737$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4201-4112 Community Development Part Time/Temporary 18,655$ (18,655)$ -$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4201-4180 Community Development Retirement 214,086$ (83,258)$ 130,828$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4201-4185 Community Development Alternative Retirement System 1,800$ (1,800)$ -$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4201-4187 Community Development Uniform Allowance 1,220$ (419)$ 801$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4201-4188 Community Development Employee Benefits 127,734$ 17,687$ 145,421$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4201-4189 Community Development Medicare Benefits 11,207$ 909$ 12,116$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4201-4201 Community Development Contract Serv/Private 237,709$ 147,000$ 384,709$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4201-4317 Community Development Conference/Training 13,400$ 10,000$ 23,400$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4601-4102 Parks/Recreation Regular Salaries 725,937$ 7,952$ 733,889$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4601-4111 Parks/Recreation Accrual Cash In 31,178$ (20,269)$ 10,909$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4601-4112 Parks/Recreation Part Time/Temporary 333,000$ 3,433$ 336,433$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4601-4120 Parks/Recreation Additional Duties Pay -$ 400$ 400$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4601-4180 Parks/Recreation Retirement 246,746$ 155,015$ 401,761$ Expenditure Attachment 2Page 600 of 1126 001 General Fund 001-4601-4188 Parks/Recreation Employee Benefits 109,184$ 23,067$ 132,251$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-4601-4189 Parks/Recreation Medicare Benefits 10,935$ 6,145$ 17,080$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-8111-4201 CIP 111 Sheldon Donation Contract Serv/Private -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-8112-4201 CIP 112 Chamber Donation Contract Serv/Private -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ Expenditure 001 General Fund 001-1299-4399 Management Support Transfers Out -$ 317,833$ 317,833$ Transfers Out 105 Lighting & Landscaping Fund 105-2601-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 93,339$ 2,495$ 95,834$ Expenditure 105 Lighting & Landscaping Fund 105-2601-4106 Public Works Regular Overtime 4,143$ 10,314$ 14,457$ Expenditure 105 Lighting & Landscaping Fund 105-2601-4111 Public Works Accrual Cash In -$ 4,317$ 4,317$ Expenditure 105 Lighting & Landscaping Fund 105-2601-4180 Public Works Retirement 25,296$ 7,705$ 33,001$ Expenditure 105 Lighting & Landscaping Fund 105-2601-4187 Public Works Uniform Allowance 312$ 70$ 382$ Expenditure 105 Lighting & Landscaping Fund 105-2601-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 17,847$ 630$ 18,477$ Expenditure 105 Lighting & Landscaping Fund 105-2601-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 1,386$ 273$ 1,659$ Expenditure 115 Gas Tax Fund 115-4202-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 37,009$ 6,148$ 43,157$ Expenditure 115 Gas Tax Fund 115-4202-4180 Public Works Retirement 3,030$ 679$ 3,709$ Expenditure 115 Gas Tax Fund 115-4202-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 5,067$ 1,012$ 6,079$ Expenditure 115 Gas Tax Fund 115-4202-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 517$ 114$ 631$ Expenditure 115 Gas Tax Fund 115-8105-4201 CIP 105 Annual Street Improvements Contract Serv/Private 148,165$ (60,200)$ 87,965$ Expenditure 116 TDA 3 Fund 116-8193-4201 CIP 193 Ped. Safety Improvements Contract Serv/Private 18,000$ (18,000)$ -$ Expenditure 117 AB939 Fund 117-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 4,587$ 630$ 5,217$ Revenue 122 Tyco Fund 122-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 7,430$ 47,616$ 55,046$ Revenue 122 Tyco Fund 122-8105-4201 CIP 105 Annual Street Improvements Contract Serv/Private 230,762$ (191,336)$ 39,426$ Expenditure 122 Tyco Fund 122-8502-4201 CIP 502 Green Belt Ped Trail Contract Serv/Private 3,000$ (3,000)$ -$ Expenditure 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 125-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 1,415$ 6,890$ 8,305$ Revenue 125 Parks / Rec Facility Tax Fund 125-8603-4201 CIP 603 South Park Improvements Contract Serv/Private 19,193$ (9,597)$ 9,596$ Expenditure 135 Bayview Drive District Admin Expense Fund 135-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 189$ (189)$ -$ Revenue 135 Bayview Drive District Admin Expense Fund 135-3450 Use of Money & Property Investment Discount 5$ (5)$ -$ Revenue 138 Loma District Admin Expense Fund 138-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 1$ (1)$ -$ Revenue 139 Beach Drive District Assessment Admin Fund 139-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 103$ (103)$ -$ Revenue 139 Beach Drive District Assessment Admin Fund 139-3450 Use of Money & Property Investment Discount 3$ (3)$ -$ Revenue 145 Proposition A Fund 145-3405-4251 Management Support Contract Serv/Gov't 800,000$ (800,000)$ -$ Expenditure 145 Proposition A Fund 145-3408-4102 Community Development Regular Salaries 3,865$ (3,865)$ -$ Expenditure 145 Proposition A Fund 145-3409-4201 Parks/Recreation Contract Serv/Private 28,000$ 18,000$ 46,000$ Expenditure 146 Prop A Fund 146-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 13,590$ 11,409$ 24,999$ Revenue 146 Proposition C Fund 146-4202-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 27,957$ (2,865)$ 25,092$ Expenditure 146 Proposition C Fund 146-4202-4180 Public Works Retirement 2,230$ 412$ 2,642$ Expenditure 146 Proposition C Fund 146-4202-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 3,409$ (449)$ 2,960$ Expenditure 146 Proposition C Fund 146-4202-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 394$ (22)$ 372$ Expenditure 147 Measure R Fund 147-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 6,380$ 907$ 7,287$ Revenue 147 Measure R Fund 147-4202-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 1,367$ 1,480$ 2,847$ Expenditure 147 Measure R Fund 147-4202-4180 Public Works Retirement 116$ 313$ 429$ Expenditure 147 Measure R Fund 147-4202-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 184$ 214$ 398$ Expenditure 147 Measure R Fund 147-4202-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 20$ 21$ 41$ Expenditure 147 Measure R Fund 147-8105-4201 CIP 105 Annual Street Improvements Contract Serv/Private 113,684$ (18,354)$ 95,330$ Expenditure 149 Measure W Fund 149-3132 Other Taxes Measure W Local Returns 150,000$ 5,879$ 155,879$ Revenue 149 Measure W Fund 149-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 7,783$ 20,671$ 28,454$ Revenue 149 Measure W Fund 149-4202-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 19,358$ (1,948)$ 17,410$ Expenditure 149 Measure W Fund 149-4202-4180 Public Works Retirement 1,498$ 192$ 1,690$ Expenditure 149 Measure W Fund 149-4202-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 2,329$ (201)$ 2,128$ Expenditure 149 Measure W Fund 149-4202-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 264$ (6)$ 258$ Expenditure 150 Grants Fund 150-3594 Intergovernmental / State CalRecycle Grant -$ 460,000$ 460,000$ Revenue 150 Grants Fund 150-3596 Intergovernmental / State CalRecycle Rubber Grant -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ Revenue 152 AQMD Fund 152-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 500$ 3,369$ 3,869$ Revenue 153 Supp Law Enf Serv Fund 153-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 10,831$ 6,262$ 17,093$ Revenue 160 Sewer Fund 160-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 39,985$ 31,527$ 71,512$ Revenue 160 Sewer Fund 160-3102-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 225,216$ (16,925)$ 208,291$ Expenditure 160 Sewer Fund 160-3102-4106 Public Works Regular Overtime 380$ 2,995$ 3,375$ Expenditure 160 Sewer Fund 160-3102-4111 Public Works Accrual Cash In 11,705$ (1,137)$ 10,568$ Expenditure 160 Sewer Fund 160-3102-4180 Public Works Retirement 68,428$ (32,617)$ 35,811$ Expenditure 160 Sewer Fund 160-3102-4187 Public Works Uniform Allowance 192$ 46$ 238$ Expenditure 160 Sewer Fund 160-3102-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 31,246$ 693$ 31,939$ Expenditure 160 Sewer Fund 160-3102-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 3,108$ 231$ 3,339$ Expenditure 160 Sewer Fund 160-4202-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 106,044$ (8,154)$ 97,890$ Expenditure 160 Sewer Fund 160-4202-4180 Public Works Retirement 8,750$ 1,273$ 10,023$ Expenditure Attachment 2Page 601 of 1126 160 Sewer Fund 160-4202-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 13,466$ (1,591)$ 11,875$ Expenditure 160 Sewer Fund 160-4202-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 1,539$ (90)$ 1,449$ Expenditure 160 Sewer Fund 160-8421-4201 CIP 421 Annual Sewer Improvements Contract Serv/Private 3,865,610$ (2,099,726)$ 1,765,884$ Expenditure 161 Storm Drains Fund 161-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 23,215$ 62,115$ 85,330$ Revenue 161 Storm Drain Fund 161-3109-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 258,299$ (31,364)$ 226,935$ Expenditure 161 Storm Drain Fund 161-3109-4106 Public Works Regular Overtime -$ 3,374$ 3,374$ Expenditure 161 Storm Drain Fund 161-3109-4111 Public Works Accrual Cash In -$ 6,720$ 6,720$ Expenditure 161 Storm Drain Fund 161-3109-4180 Public Works Retirement 41,734$ (3,633)$ 38,101$ Expenditure 161 Storm Drain Fund 161-3109-4187 Public Works Uniform Allowance 192$ 46$ 238$ Expenditure 161 Storm Drain Fund 161-3109-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 35,001$ (843)$ 34,158$ Expenditure 161 Storm Drain Fund 161-3109-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 3,578$ (71)$ 3,507$ Expenditure 161 Storm Drain Fund 161-4202-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 116,645$ (13,334)$ 103,311$ Expenditure 161 Storm Drain Fund 161-4202-4180 Public Works Retirement 9,717$ 1,274$ 10,991$ Expenditure 161 Storm Drain Fund 161-4202-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 15,033$ (3,085)$ 11,948$ Expenditure 161 Storm Drain Fund 161-4202-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 1,693$ (157)$ 1,536$ Expenditure 170 Asset Seizure/Foft Fund 170-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 10,659$ 14,166$ 24,825$ Revenue 190 RTI Undersea Cable Fund 190-4202-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 69,904$ (5,963)$ 63,941$ Expenditure 190 RTI Undersea Cable Fund 190-4202-4180 Public Works Retirement 5,572$ 1,177$ 6,749$ Expenditure 190 RTI Undersea Cable Fund 190-4202-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 8,538$ (756)$ 7,782$ Expenditure 190 RTI Undersea Cable Fund 190-4202-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 979$ (32)$ 947$ Expenditure 190 RTI Undersea Cable Fund 190-8695-4201 CIP 695 Parking Lot A Improvements Contract Serv/Private 112,368$ (96,202)$ 16,166$ Expenditure 191 RTI Tidelands Undersea 191-8695-4201 CIP 695 Parking Lot A Improvements Contract Serv/Private 95,000$ (95,000)$ -$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 172,495$ 164,656$ 337,151$ Revenue 301 CIP Fund 301-4202-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 276,352$ (20,150)$ 256,202$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-4202-4180 Public Works Retirement 22,148$ 5,301$ 27,449$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-4202-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 33,825$ (2,042)$ 31,783$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-4202-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 3,870$ (90)$ 3,780$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-8109-4201 CIP 109 Utility Box Wrappings Contract Serv/Private 26,516$ (7,200)$ 19,316$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-8502-4201 CIP 502 Green Belt Ped Trail Contract Serv/Private 38,995$ (25,702)$ 13,293$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-8603-4201 CIP 603 South Park Contract Serv/Private 1,275,214$ (1,080,630)$ 194,584$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-8604-4201 CIP 604 City Wide ADA Improvements Contract Serv/Private 300,952$ (288,692)$ 12,260$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-8605-4201 CIP 605 City Facilities Contract Serv/Private 346,530$ (346,530)$ -$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-8615-4201 CIP 615 New Corporate Yard Facility Contract Serv/Private 1,000,000$ 889,278$ 1,889,278$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-8617-4201 CIP 617 Civic Center Charging Stations Contract Serv/Private 49,130$ (49,130)$ -$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-8619-4201 CIP 619 Kelly Courts Improvements Contract Serv/Private 601,681$ 51,403$ 653,084$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-8633-4201 CIP 633 Base 3 Electrical Improvements Contract Serv/Private 300,000$ (200,000)$ 100,000$ Expenditure 301 CIP Fund 301-8689-4201 CIP 689 Clark Building Renovations Contract Serv/Private 414,607$ (200,000)$ 214,607$ Expenditure 609 Bayview Drive District Redemption Fund 609-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 1,798$ (1,798)$ -$ Revenue 609 Bayview Drive District Redemption Fund 609-3450 Use of Money & Property Investment Discount 44$ (44)$ -$ Revenue 609 Bayview Drive District Redemption Fund 609-1299-4399 Management Support Transfers Out -$ 27,097$ 27,097$ Transfers Out 610 Lower Pier District Redemption Fund 610-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 94$ (94)$ -$ Revenue 610 Lower Pier District Redemption Fund 610-3450 Use of Money & Property Investment Discount 2$ (2)$ -$ Revenue 610 Lower Pier District Redemption Fund 623-1299-4399 Management Support Transfers Out -$ 3,550$ 3,550$ Transfers Out 611 Beach Drive Redemption Fund 611-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 376$ (376)$ -$ Revenue 611 Beach Drive Redemption Fund 611-3450 Use of Money & Property Investment Discount 9$ (9)$ -$ Revenue 611 Beach Drive Redemption Fund 623-1299-4399 Management Support Transfers Out -$ 2,294$ 2,294$ Transfers Out 612 Beach Drive Reserve Fund 612-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 138$ -$ 138$ Revenue 612 Beach Drive Reserve Fund 612-3450 Use of Money & Property Investment Discount 3$ -$ 3$ Revenue 612 Beach Drive Reserve Fund 612-3475 Use of Money & Property Investment Premium -$ -$ -$ Revenue 617 Myrtle Avenue Assessment Fund 623-1299-4399 Management Support Transfers Out -$ 52,131$ 52,131$ Transfers Out 618 Loma Drive Assessment Fund 623-1299-4399 Management Support Transfers Out -$ 90,040$ 90,040$ Transfers Out 619 Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 619-3401 Use of Money & Property Interest Income 452$ (452)$ -$ Revenue 619 Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 619-3450 Use of Money & Property Investment Discount 11$ (11)$ -$ Revenue 705 Insurance Fund 705-3904 Other Revenue Refunds / Reimbursements -$ 107,754$ 107,754$ Revenue 705 Insurance Fund 705-3955 Transfers In Assigned - FY25 Actuals to FY 26 Ins. Fund -$ 317,833$ 317,833$ Transfer In 705 Insurance Fund 705-1209-4102 Management Support Regular Salaries 70,230$ (15,213)$ 55,017$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1209-4106 Management Support Regular Overtime 127$ (127)$ -$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1209-4111 Management Support Accrual Cash In 4,153$ (1,168)$ 2,985$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1209-4180 Management Support Retirement 5,973$ (2,411)$ 3,562$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1209-4188 Management Support Employee Benefits 6,726$ (3,481)$ 3,245$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1209-4189 Management Support Medicare Benefits 1,021$ (150)$ 871$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1209-4201 Management Support Contract Serv/Private 1,542,274$ (200,000)$ 1,342,274$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1209-4324 Management Support Claims/Settlements 1,000,000$ (100,000)$ 900,000$ Expenditure Attachment 2Page 602 of 1126 705 Insurance Fund 705-1210-4201 Management Support Contract Serv/Private 221,302$ 200,000$ 421,302$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1215-4186 Management Support Unemployment Claims 28,000$ (28,000)$ -$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1217-4102 Management Support Regular Salaries 70,230$ (15,213)$ 55,017$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1217-4106 Management Support Regular Overtime 127$ (127)$ -$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1217-4111 Management Support Accrual Cash In 1,844$ 1,141$ 2,985$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1217-4180 Management Support Retirement 5,973$ (1,798)$ 4,175$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1217-4188 Management Support Employee Benefits 6,726$ (3,481)$ 3,245$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1217-4189 Management Support Medicare Benefits 1,021$ (150)$ 871$ Expenditure 705 Insurance Fund 705-1217-4324 Management Support Claims/Settlements 600,000$ 100,000$ 700,000$ Expenditure 715 Equipment Replacement 715-1206-5401 Management Support Equip 70,000$ 21,535$ 91,535$ Expenditure 715 Equipment Replacement 715-2101-4201 Public Safety - Police Contract Serv/Private 173,181$ 17,506$ 190,687$ Expenditure 715 Equipment Replacement 715-2101-5403 Public Safety - Police Vehicles 522,225$ 53,300$ 575,525$ Expenditure 715 Equipment Replacement 715-3302-4201 Public Safety - Police Contract Serv/Private -$ 32,806$ 32,806$ Expenditure 715 Equipment Replacement 715-3302-5403 Public Safety - Police Vehicles 72,567$ 53,300$ 125,867$ Expenditure 715 Equipment Replacement 715-4206-4102 Public Works Regular Salaries 193,737$ (16,962)$ 176,775$ Expenditure 715 Equipment Replacement 715-4206-4106 Public Works Regular Overtime 4,552$ (1,427)$ 3,125$ Expenditure 715 Equipment Replacement 715-4206-4111 Public Works Accrual Cash In 4,070$ (2,226)$ 1,844$ Expenditure 715 Equipment Replacement 715-4206-4180 Public Works Retirement 113,088$ (1,314)$ 111,774$ Expenditure 715 Equipment Replacement 715-4206-4187 Public Works Uniform Allowance 504$ (474)$ 30$ Expenditure 715 Equipment Replacement 715-4206-4188 Public Works Employee Benefits 37,790$ 1,174$ 38,964$ Expenditure 715 Equipment Replacement 715-4206-4189 Public Works Medicare Benefits 2,831$ (193)$ 2,638$ Expenditure 715 Equipment Replacement 715-4601-5401 Parks/Recreation Equip -$ 2,550$ 2,550$ Expenditure Attachment 2Page 603 of 1126 FY 2025-2026 CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE/TRAINING BUDGET SUMMARY CONFERENCE/TRAINING DETOY KEEGAN JACKSON FRANCOIS SAEMANN TOTAL INDEPENDENT CITIES ASSOCIATION SUMMER SEMINAR $2,106.10 (7/11/25 - 7/13/25) LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE $1,305.98 $725.00 (10/8/25 - 10/10/25) LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DIVISION DINNER AT ANNUAL CONFERENCE $75.00 $75.00 (10/8/25) LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES TCPW POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING $1,243.42 (1/21/25 - 1/23/25) CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION SACRAMENTO LEGISLATIVE TOUR $2,387.64 (1/5/26 - 1/7/26) LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES JANUARY MEMBERSHIP MEETING $50.00 (1/8/26) INDEPENDENT CITIES ASSOCIATION WINTER SEMINAR $1,828.70 (2/19/26 - 2/22/26) SOUTHERN CA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL CONFERENCE AND GENERAL ASSEMBLY (5/7/26 - 5/8/26) CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION ANNUAL MUNICIPAL SEMINAR (5/14/26 - 5/17/26) UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS ANNUAL MEETING (6/4/26 - 6/7/26) $0.00 $0.00 $4,216.34 $2,674.40 $2,906.10 $9,796.84 BUDGET:$28,000.00 BALANCE REMAINING:$18,203.16 Page 604 of 1126 FY 26 MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW MARCH 24, 2026 Page 605 of 1126 Midyear Budget Adjustments +$552K Revenue Increase Driven by parking meters, plan checks, and an one- time $100K reimbursement +$1.835M Operating Appropriations Driven mainly by $1.28M labor growth from recently negotiated MOUs -$548K Projected Shortfall Projected by June 30, 2026 after midyear adjustments $548K One-Time Funds Used Additional one-time funds at midyear to balance the current FY 26 budget $236K of $548K One-Time Deputy City Manager savings $312K of $548K One-Time FY 25 Stabilization Contingency Main Takeaway •The City intends to end the FY 2026 without a deficit, but only drawing from one-time resources. •Management should treat one-time resources are a temporary solution as a bridge, not a permanent fix, heading into the upcoming FY 2026–27 budget cycle. Page 606 of 1126 FY 26 Budget with Midyear Adjustments Amount One-Time Funds at Budget Adoption $361K Amended Estimated Revenue $55.561M Midyear Revenue Adjustments $552K Total Estimated Revenue and One-Time Funds $56.474M Amended Operating Appropriations $53.399M Transfers Out $1.788M Midyear Operating Appropriation Increases $1.835M Total Estimated Operating Appropriations $57.022M Projected FY 2026 Ending Shortfall at 6/30/2026 -$548K Additional One-time Funds at Midyear +$548K Projected FY 2026 Ending Balance after One-Time Funds $ 0 $909K. Total one-time assigned funds used to balance FY 2026. The balance depends on one-time “fixes” / non- recurring resources rather than recurring operating growth. Page 607 of 1126 Midyear Revenue Breakdown What is driving the increase? •Updated parking meter rates adopted in October 2025 are expected to add about $635k this year to current service charges. •Plan-check fees is projected to increase $240k based on 1st ½ of the year. •An one-time $100K reimbursement for City Administrative costs from the Greenwich Undergrounding Bond Issuance. $(158,305) $(87,355) $(50,284) $(46,000) $(4,074) $10,792 $130,000 $757,573 $(400,000) $(200,000) $- $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 Property Taxes Licenses and Permits Use of Money & Property Sales Taxes Other Taxes Utility Users Tax Other Revenue Current Service Charges Midyear Revenue Amendments What is softening results? •Property tax projected lower due to successful valuation appeals and higher expected delinquency payment rate. •Decreases in electrical and plumbing permits (offset by building permits) from 1st ½ of the year. Page 608 of 1126 Midyear Revenue Chart Amended Budget to Date Requested Budget Amendment Revised Budget % Change Property Taxes $ 26,750,921 $ (158,305)$ 26,592,616 -0.6% Sales Taxes $ 3,686,400 $ (46,000)$ 3,640,000 -1.3% Utility User's Tax $ 2,502,252 $ 10,792 $ 2,513,044 0.4% Transient Occupancy Tax $ 5,190,000 $ -$ 5,190,000 0.0% Other Taxes $ 2,822,559 $ (4,074)$ 2,818,485 -0.1% Licenses and Permits $ 1,145,946 $ (87,355)$ 1,058,591 -7.6% Fines and Forfeitures $ 2,001,500 $ -$ 2,001,700 0.0% Use of Money & Property $ 1,700,765 $ (50,284)$ 1,650,481 -2.9% Intergovernmental / State $ 153,414 $ -$ 153,414 0.0% Current Service Charges $ 9,691,637 $ 757,573 $ 10,449,210 7.8% Other Revenue $ 68,200 $ 130,000 $ 198,200 190.6% Total Revenue $ 55,713,194 $ 552,347 $ 56,265,541 1.0% Transfers-in $ 361,054 $ 175,112 $ 536,166 48.5%Page 609 of 1126 Midyear Expenditure Breakdown $557K Non-Labor Increase Mostly contract services $1.278M Labor Increase Salary and benefit increases from MOU’s $237,577 $226,078 $101,420 $925,663 $174,836 $(6,110) $175,743 $(200,000) $- $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 Legislative Management Support Prospective Expenditures Police Public Works Community Development Parks & Recreation Midyear Expenditure Amendments Labor Non-LaborPage 610 of 1126 Midyear Expenditure Breakdown •Police $926K increase is due to the new MOU’s which account 98.6% of the increase. •Legislative $200k increase for City Attorney budget based on 1st half of FY26 activity. •Community Development labor decreased but offset by contractual service needs. Page 611 of 1126 Other Fund Highlights •705 Insurance Fund: Transfer $317,833 to bring beginning FY 2026 balance up to the $3.0M funding goal. •715 Equipment Replace. Fund: Additional $181,000 for technology and police equipment purchases. Includes $106,600 to purchase 2 Ford Explorers for Police Admin staff. Page 612 of 1126 CIP Adjustments & Highlights +$1.439M Net Change to CIP Fund Projected ending CIP balance: $1.664M +$1.274M Completed projects released back to CIP Fund. Primarily from lower than actual costs Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Highlights •Major releases include CIP 603 South Park Landscape Improvements, CIP 604 ADA Improvements, CIP 605 City Facilities Assessment, and CIP 689 Clark Building renovations. •New appropriations highlighted are CIP 615 New Corporate Yard Facilities using set aside reserve balance of ~$889K and CIP 619 Kelly Court Improvements for ~$51K . •Chuck and Diane (Missy) Sheldon $500K donation for CIP 111 Monument Signage and Chambers September 2014 $50K donation for CIP 112 Marquee Sign to be budgeted. •Release needed to free up funds for necessary CIP projects next budget cycle. Page 613 of 1126 FY26 to FY31 Forecast (Adopted Budget) Page 614 of 1126 Balanced Using One-Time Funds •City practice is using one-time savings and measures to manage structural City budget deficits. •If the one-time $100K Greenwich Admin reimbursement is excluded, the projected FY 26 shortfall without one-time funds would rise to over $1 million. •Not sustainable for the City as expenditures outpacing revenues. Page 615 of 1126 Future Upcoming FY 27 Uncertainty •CalPERS Pension UAL increasing by ~$600K next FY 27 budget cycle. •MOU costs will put pressure to base budget. •RCC increasing by nearly ~$100K next FY 27 budget cycle. •Fire (Dec 27) and LA County (Mar 27) Agreements forward risk. •City Vendor Service Contracts Up for Negotiations. Page 616 of 1126 Future Upcoming 27 Uncertainty •General Fund ~$410K annual subsidy of Lighting / Landscaping Fund •CIP Fund absorbs $300 - $350K of General Fund Public Works labor as past and current practice. •Insurance Fund $3.0M funding goal •CIP projects – Critical Infrastructure Needs •Cuts to upcoming FY 27 budget are needed to maintain core priority City services. Page 617 of 1126 Midyear Recommendation 1 Approve revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations, budget transfers, and fund balances. 2 Appropriate $548,007 of assigned fund balance to cover the projected unassigned fund balance shortfall. 3 Transfer $317,833 of unspent 2024–25 actuals to the Insurance Fund. 4 Receive and file the City Council Travel Summary. 5 Provide direction on whether to continue or discontinue participation in Beach Cities Transit Line 109. 2a 2b Assign estimated remaining $2.239M of unspent funds to assigned fund balance.2c 3 4 Page 618 of 1126 Beach Cities Transit 109 •City participated in BCT Line 109 since 2006 with minimal subsidy requirements. •BCT Line 109 subsidy currently budgeted for $17,200 using Prop A funds. •Expected to increase to $19,800 for upcoming FY 27 budget. •Insufficient usage data provided to City. Page 619 of 1126 FY 26 MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW MARCH 24, 2026 Page 620 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 15 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PR-015 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council KELLY COURTS – PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS (Senior Recreation Supervisor Brian Sousa) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Approve modifications to the Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy, including revisions to the permissible play equipment and designating courts 1 and 2 for reservation and open walk-on play, with Courts 3 and 4 open for walk-on play only; and 2. Approve one of the following options to modify the courts’ hours of operation: Option 1 (Attachment 2): o Monday: Closed o Tuesday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. o Wednesday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. o Thursday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. o Friday–Sunday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Option 2 (Attachment 3): o 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily; or Option 3 (Attachment 1): o The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission’s (Commission) recommendation to maintain the facility hours as currently designated : Sunday and Monday: Closed Tuesday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Wednesday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Thursday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Friday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.; and o request for staff to report back to the Commission within 120 days following the reopening of the courts with a report on complaints, community feedback, and court usage. Executive Summary: The Kelly Pickleball Courts have high local demand and limited hours. Following the completion of Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 619–Kelly Court Improvements, the two formerly closed pickleball courts will reopen, providing a total of four courts at the Kelly Courts, located within the Clark Complex. Page 621 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 15 At the February 10, 2026 Commission meeting, staff presented modifications to the Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy, including revisions to permissible play equipment and the designation of Courts 1 and 2 for reservation and open walk-on play, with Courts 3 and 4 reserved for walk-on play only. Prior to the closure of the courts for Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 619–Kelly Court Improvements, the two available courts were open for both reservation and walk-on play. Staff also presented two options to modify the courts’ hours of operation, as further detailed in the staff report. The Commission approved the recommended policy updates regarding permissible play equipment but recommended maintaining the current hours of operation and requested that staff report back within 120 days following reopening with information on complaints, community feedback, and court usage. Staff recommends City Council approval of the proposed Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy updates and determine whether to maintain current hours or adopt one of the proposed expanded hours options. Background: Pickleball is a racquet sport that combines elements of tennis, badminton, and ping pong and has experienced continuous growth in popularity over the last decade, with increasing local demand among Hermosa Beach residents. In March 2017, following extensive community engagement, City Council approved the Commission’s recommendation to convert one of the two Kelly Tennis Courts at the Clark Complex into four dedicated pickleball courts. The Kelly Pickleball Courts opened to the public in May 2017. In 2020, two courts were closed due to safety issues stemming from site constraints and deferred maintenance. In response, staff developed CIP 619–Kelly Court Improvements, which was approved in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022–23 budget as a resurfacing and reconfiguration project. The project scope later expanded in FY 2023–24 to include lighting upgrades, ADA-compliant pathways, and modernization of all court types at the facility. The project will allow for the reopening of the two closed courts through reconfiguration. Pickleball Stakeholders Focus Group and Outcomes Following the opening of the Kelly Pickleball Courts, community concerns emerged regarding noise from the sport. Staff and the former Department Use Policies Subcommittee (DUPS) of the Commission conducted extensive research and made several recommendations to the Commission on various noise mitigation solutions with no resolve for over three years. Therefore, staff and DUPS formed a Pickleball Stakeholders Focus Group consisting of representatives from the local neighborhood and Page 622 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 15 pickleball community. The purpose of the stakeholder group was to discuss viable solutions that would limit noise impacts to the nearby residents while providing pickleball community access during preferred times. At its June 2, 2021 meeting, staff and DUPS recommended the Commission recommend City Council approval of updates to the Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy and court hours of operation formed with the Pickleball Stakeholders Focus Group. The intention of the recommended updates was to provide the pickleball community with access to the pickleball courts during specified times, and relief to the nearby residents two days a week, and several evenings. The Commission recommended City Council approve the updated use policy and court hours with slight revisions. At its July 13, 2021 meeting, City Council approved the Commission’s recommendation on the updated use policy but revised the court hours, allowing for more court hours than initially recommended by the Commission. The approved hours, which remain current to this day are: Sunday and Monday: Closed Tuesday from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Wednesday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Thursday from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. This provided for a total of 45 hours of court access for reservations or walk on play. Attachment 1 is the current Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy. At its November 2, 2021, staff presented a follow-up report to the Commission on the effectiveness of the adopted Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy and court hours of operation. Staff reported that the feedback represented a small sample size, with three members of the pickleball community expressing dissatisfaction with the limited hours of operation, one nearby resident expressing gratitude for the hours of operation, and one nearby resident reporting that the courts were being used outside of the hours of operation. The Commission received and filed the report. Since that report, staff received additional feedback from members of the pickleball community expressing dissatisfaction with the limited hours of operation, limited availability of open play, and ongoing temporarily closure of two pickleball courts. Additionally, prior to all courts being closed due to CIP 619–Kelly Courts Improvements, members of the pickleball community expressed how difficult it was to secure play time at the two available courts. The two open courts were available for reservation by residents who obtained a pickleball membership at an annual rate, and reserved hours incurred an hourly use fee for a maximum of two hours per day per resident. Without a reservation, the courts were available on an open walk-on play basis, free of charge. However, the courts were reserved 98% of the time, and obtaining a reservation was very competitive due to the high demand. Page 623 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 15 Since the adoption of the current Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy and court hours of operation, staff has not directly received any additional feedback or concerns regarding noise impacts to date. However, it should be noted that during Commission and City Council review of CIP 619–Kelly Court Improvements in 2025, and during the Commission’s review of staff’s recommended revisions to the Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy and court hours of operation at its February 10, 2026 meeting, one nearby resident, through public comment, expressed concern about potential noise impacts assoc iated with the reopening of the two closed pickleball courts and a potential increase in hours of operation. Parks Master Plan At its November 12, 2024, meeting, City Council approved and adopted the 2024 Parks Master Plan, a long-term planning document that guides the development, maintenance, and programming of the City’s parks and recreational facilities. The plan underwent a robust community engagement process, including participation by a Parks Master Plan Subcommittee consisting of four Commissioners, two from the Commission and two from the Public Works Commission. The Parks Master Plan highlighted the growing demand for pickleball and the desire for additional facilities, while also acknowledging concerns about noise and the need to balance schedules for open play, reservations, and programming. Commission Review of Staff Recommended Modifications to the Kelly Court Use Policy and Hours of Operation At the February 10, 2026 Commission meeting, staff recommended Commission consider a recommendation to City Council to approve modifications to the Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy. The proposed modifications included revisions to permissible play equipment and the designation of Courts 1 and 2 for reservation and open walk-on play, with Courts 3 and 4 reserved for walk-on play only. Staff also requested the Commission consider one of the following options to modify the courts’ hours of operation: Option 1: o Monday: Closed o Tuesday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. o Wednesday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. o Thursday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. o Friday–Sunday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Option 2: o 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily. The recommended policy updates regarding permissible play equipment reflect the fact that the existing policy was adopted prior to recent advancements in paddl e technology and evolving standards related to noise, safety, and court surface protection. The proposed updates modernize the policy language, clarify permissible equipment, and Page 624 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 15 provide staff with appropriate enforcement authority while maintaining the original intent of the policy. Commission approved staff’s recommended Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy modifications with the exception of the recommended options to modify the courts’ hours of operation. Instead, the Commission recommended that City Council consider approval of maintaining the facility hours as currently designated, which are: Sunday and Monday: Closed Tuesday from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Wednesday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Thursday from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The Commission also requested, if the recommendation was approved by City Council to maintain the current facility hours, staff report back to the Commission within 120 days following reopening with a report on complaints, community feedback, and court usage. Past Commission and Council Actions Meeting Date Description Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: December 2, 2014 Staff presented to the Commission three resident requests to convert the two Kelly Tennis Courts into dual-use courts allowing for tennis and pickleball play. The commission requested staff advance consideration of the request through a public hearing at a future meeting. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: February 3, 2015 The Commission, through a public hearing, requested staff research alternate locations for dual-use tennis and pickleball courts and return to the Commission through a public hearing to present its findings. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: August 2, 2016 Staff presented to the Commission two new resident requests to convert only one Kelly Tennis Court into a dual-use tennis and pickleball court. The Commission requested staff return with the request through a public hearing at a future meeting. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: November 1, 2016 Through a public hearing, staff presented its findings to the Commission on an alternate location that may be considered for dual-use tennis and pickleball courts, the Edith Rodaway Park outdoor basketball court. However, the alternate location was not supported by the pickleball community due to the basketball court’s surfacing and concern about the distance between the court’s poles and the play area needed for pickleball. The Commission recommended City Council approve converting one of the Page 625 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 6 of 15 Meeting Date Description Kelly Tennis Courts into a dual-use tennis and pickleball court. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: January 3, 2017 Through a public hearing, staff presented the Commission a revised request from the residents who had recently requested converting one Kelly Tennis Court into a dual- use tennis and pickleball court. The revised request was to convert one of the Kelly Tennis Courts for pickleball play only, allowing four pickleball courts. The Commission requested staff research and provide a recommendation on which location would be most ideal to convert a tennis court into four pickleball courts, the Kelly Tennis Courts or Community Center Tennis Courts. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: February 7, 2017 Staff presented its findings to the Commission on which location would be most ideal to convert a tennis court into four pickleball courts, the Kelly Tennis Courts or Community Center Tennis Courts. Staff determined the Community Center Tennis Courts had a higher usage rate and that distance from the nearest residence at the Kelly Tennis Courts was further, and likely any noise impacts would be greater at the Community Center Tennis Courts if one of the tennis courts were converted to a pickleball court. The Commission requested staff return with a public hearing for the Commission to consider a recommendation to City Council to convert the West Kelly Tennis Court to four pickleball courts. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: March 7, 2017 Through a public hearing, the Commission recommended City Council approve converting the West Kelly Tennis Court to four pickleball courts. City Council: March 28, 2017 City Council approved the Commission’s recommendation. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: January 2, 2018 Staff presented an update to the Commission on the usage of Kelly Pickleball Courts and the noise impacts on nearby residents. The Commission requested staff return to a future meeting to further discuss the noise impacts. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: June 5, 2018 Staff recommended the Commission receive and file information related to the noise impacts on nearby residents, which included: A summary of the feedback received from the nearby residents; Effectiveness of previously installed windscreens dampening the noise from the courts; Page 626 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 7 of 15 Meeting Date Description Types of equipment and different levels of noise produced from each type; and Possible noise-dampening products that could be installed along the fences to help absorb the sound. The Commission requested staff return to the Commission with a draft Kelly Pickleball Court Use Policy for review and approval. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: August 7, 2018 Staff presented a draft Kelly Pickleball Court Use Policy to the Commission for review and approval that included policy items regarding preferred noise-dampening balls and paddles for pickleball play and court etiquette. The Commission approved the Pickleball Court Use Policy. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: October 2, 2018 Staff presented possible mitigation solutions to the Commission, including: Performing a sound study; Installation of a noise-dampening product along the fences to help absorb the sound; or Revision of the Kelly Pickleball Court Use Policy with an approved equipment list and limiting court use hours. The Commission requested staff return at a future meeting with a recommendation to limit the hours of pickleball play and allocate funds for a sound study of the Kelly Pickleball Courts. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: February 5, 2019 The Commission approved staff’s recommendation to temporarily reduce the hours of the Kelly Tennis and Pickleball Courts to 9:00 am through 9:00 p.m. daily to reduce noise impacts on nearby residents. The hours were previously 8:00 a.m. through 10:00 p.m. daily. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: August 6, 2019 Acoustic Group, Inc (AGI) presented a sound study to the Commission completed on April 11, 2019 with two recommends for noise-dampening solutions: The installation of a 12-foot high wall made of concrete block, plexiglass, or acoustical blankets, on the north and east sides of the existing pickleball and tennis courts; or The installation of a 12-foot high noise-dampening product on all exterior fences surrounding the Kelly Tennis and Pickleball Courts. Page 627 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 8 of 15 Meeting Date Description The Commission received and filed the sound study and requested AGI return to the Commission with a presentation on the costs for the recommended options. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: December 3, 2019 Staff recommended the Commission: Review the revised sound study from AGI, including costs associated with the two recommendations for noise-dampening products; and Maintain the current hours of operations for the Kelly Tennis and Pickleball Courts until a formal decision has been made regarding the noise mitigation options. The Commission requested staff work alongside the since retired Department Use Policies Subcommittee to consider a recommendation on the noise-dampening products and limiting the court use hours and return to the Commission with a formal recommendation at a future meeting. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: July 7, 2020 Staff recommended the Commission approve: a temporary Pickleball Membership Program open to residents, with an annual membership fee, allowing residents to make reservations at an hourly cost; and limiting the use hours to : o Sunday and Monday: closed; o Tuesday to Thursday: 9:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m., and o Friday and Saturday: 10:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. The recommendation came as a result of a Safer at Home Order for Los Angeles County due to COVID-19 the Kelly Courts were closed on March 16, 2020. On May 13, 2020, a revised order was issued allowing for the reopening of the courts. These times were determined to provide the nearby residents, many of whom were working from home during Los Angeles County’s Safer at Home Orders, relief in the afternoons and later evenings as well as two days free from noise emanating from pickleball play. The Commission approved the recommendation. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: June 2, 2021 Staff and DUPS recommended the Commission recommend to City Council the approval of revisions to the Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy and hours of operation, formed with the Pickleball Stakeholders Focus Group. The Commission recommended City Council approval of the updated use policies and hours with slight revisions. Page 628 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 9 of 15 Meeting Date Description City Council: July 13, 2021 City Council approved the Commission’s recommendation on the updated use policies with revisions to the hours. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: November 2, 2021 Staff presented a report to the Commission on the effectiveness of the updated Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy and hours of operation. City Council: April 21, 2022 Staff recommended CIP 619–Kelly Court Pickleball Improvements to City Council. City Council: June 14, 2022 City Council approved CIP 619–Kelly Court Pickleball Improvements as part of the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget and CIP. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: April 17, 2023 The Commission provided input that it deemed the CIP 619–Kelly Court Improvements a high-priority project. City Council: April 20, 2023 Staff proposed a revised scope of work for CIP 619–Kelly Court Pickleball Improvements to City Council. City Council: June 7, 2023 City Council approved CIP 619–Kelly Court Improvements as part of the FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget and CIP. City Council: April 18, 2024 City Council provided input on the FY 24-25 CIP including the Estimated CIP Project Schedule that detailed the conclusion of the final design for CIP 619–Kelly Court Improvements and advertisement of construction within FY 24-25. The CIP presentation also detailed plans to renovate Kelly Courts. Parks and Recreation Advisory and Public Works Commissions: October 29, 2024 Joint Commission and Public Works Commission Parks Master Plan 2024 Study Session. City Council: November 12, 2024 City Council Approved and Adopted the 2024 Parks Master Plan. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: April 1, 2025 The Commission reviewed CIP Project 619–Kelly Court Improvements and provided feedback to City Council. City Council: September 30, 2025 City Council approved the award of a construction contract for CIP 619–Kelly Court Improvements. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: February 10, 2025 The Commission approved staff’s recommended Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy modifications with the exception of modifications to the courts’ hours of operation. The Commission recommended City Council approve maintaining the current hours of operations and requested staff report back to the Commission within 120 Page 629 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 10 of 15 Meeting Date Description days following reopening with a report on complaints, community feedback, and court usage. Discussion: The functions of the Parks and Recreation Department (Department) are to provide opportunities for educational, recreational, cultural, and social service activities for all age groups, to develop and maintain the City’s leisure areas and facilities in an attractive and safe manner, and to ensure that such facilities are suitable for a wide variety of purposes. The sport of Pickleball has grown significantly in popularity since the current Kelly Court Use Policy and hours of operation were adopted in 2021. For example, the Major League Pickleball (MLP) was founded in 2021. MLP is a professional league that features a team- based format similar to other major professional sports leagues, where teams of professional players compete in organized events held in cities across the United States. The league has helped elevate the sport’s national visibility and legitimacy as a professional competition. In addition, in 2024, the Professional Pickleball Association, which operated the largest professional pickleball tournament tour in the United States, and MLP merged forming the United Pickleball Association, effectively aligning the two largest professional pickleball organizations and further consolidating the professional landscape of the sport. Since 2025, the leagues have been featured on major sports broadcasting networks, such as ESPN, demonstrating the sport’s continued national growth and mainstream recognition. Pickleball is recognized as the fastest-growing sport in America and within the field of parks and recreation, according to the Sports and Fitness Industry Association. The sport saw a 52% increase in participation from 2022 to 2023 alone, with an estimated 23 million active players in 2025 and approximately 48 million adults in the United States having played at least once in the past year. The fastest growth is among ages 25–34, making it popular with working adults seeking social and flexible recreation opportunities. According to the most recent census reporting, 25 percent of Hermosa Beach residents are ages 25–39, and 58 percent are ages 25–59. Local demand in Hermosa Beach continues to increase. Table 1 below shows the total annual pickleball memberships purchased, along with the associated revenue from memberships and member court reservations since the creation of the Pickleball Membership Program. Table 1: Annual Pickleball Memberships for Hermosa Beach Page 630 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 11 of 15 Calendar Year Total # of Memberships Purchased Total Revenue from Memberships* Total Revenue from Member Reservations* 2021 204 $3,071 $19,112 2022 290 $4,656 $33,739 2023 279 $4,758 $37,782 2024 290 $5,220 $37,714 2025 206 $3,708 $29,142 *The annual membership rate and hourly reservation rate increase by up to 5% annually based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) to keep fees aligned with inflation and the cost of providing services. The City’s membership data displays increases in annual membership, membership revenue, and reservation revenue from 2021 in comparison to 2024 and consistently high demand of requests for court access. A decrease in 2025 was due to the temporary closure of all courts due to CIP 619–Kelly Court Improvements. In addition, staff conducted best practice research of local cities’ pickleball courts’ hours of operations and total number of courts available (Table 2). Table 2 only outlines information about dedicated pickleball courts in each City that are managed by each City, and not dual use courts. Table 2: Local Cities Pickleball Court Hours of Operations City Location and Hours of Operations Total Dedicated Courts Manhattan Beach Manhattan Heights Park Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Manhattan Beach Middle School Saturday and Sunday 8:00 a.m. to Dusk 3 6 Redondo Beach Alta Vista Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 4 Torrance Charles H. Wilson Park 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily Walteria Park 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. daily 2 6 Page 631 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 12 of 15 Table 2: Local Cities Pickleball Court Hours of Operations Continued City Location and Hours of Operations Total Dedicated Courts Torrance Sur La Brea Park 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. daily 4 El Segundo Recreation Park 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily 4 Lomita Lomita Park 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily 4 In Hermosa Beach, high local demand and limited court hours have created constraints on pickleball availability. These limitations can hinder membership growth, drop -in participation, and the overall user experience. Expanding operating hours would better meet local demand, support the continued growth of pickleball in the community, and bring Hermosa Beach’s court access and scheduling more in line with nearby cities. At its February 10, 2026 meeting, the Commission recommended approval of staff’s proposed Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy modifications, except f or staff’s proposed changes to the court hours of operation, supporting instead maintaining the current hours for 120 days with a report back on complaints, community feedback, and court usage. Commissioners expressed the following concerns regarding expa nsion of the courts’ hours of operation: The reopening of the two previously closed pickleball courts following completion of CIP 619–Kelly Court Improvements, resulting in a total of four courts, and concern that this could potentially increase noise impacts to nearby residents. The close proximity of nearby residences to the pickleball courts compared to the location of pickleball courts in other local cities, where facilities may be situated farther from residential areas. In response to these concerns, staff notes that the reopening of the two previously closed courts would restore the facility to its originally intended configuration of four courts, consistent with the design approved when the courts were first established. While reopening the two closed courts would increase the number of simultaneous games that could occur at the facility, it would not necessarily result in a proportional doubling of noise levels and would result in a modest change in perceived sound. With regard to the proximity of the courts to nearby residences, staff conducted a review of comparable pickleball facilities in neighboring cities. The analysis found that pickleball courts in surrounding communities are generally located between approximately 60-350 feet (ft.) from residential properties on average. Local cities examples are provided in Table 3. Table 3: Local Cities Pickleball Court Distance to Residences Page 632 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 13 of 15 City Pickleball Courts Location Approximate Distance to Residences Manhattan Beach Heights Park Manhattan Beach Middle School 190–280 ft. 50–150 ft. Redondo Beach Alta Vista 60–180 ft. Torrance Charles H. Wilson Park Walteria Park Sur La Brea Park 140–350 ft. 150–280 ft. 140–210 ft. El Segundo Recreation Park 100–190 ft. Lomita Lomita Park 70–160 ft. By comparison, the Kelly Pickleball Courts in Hermosa Beach are located approximately 190–480 ft. from nearby residences, which places the facility within or beyond the range observed at comparable facilities in neighboring jurisdictions. The following provides additional information regarding staff’s proposed options for modifications to the court hours of operation, which were presented to the Commission and are still recommended for City Council consideration in addition to the Commission’s recommendation. Proposed Operating Hours: Option 1 In Option 1, staff proposes adjusting the Kelly Pickleball Court hours of operation to: Monday: closed Tuesday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Wednesday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Thursday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Friday–Sunday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. In comparison to the current hours, Option 1 would maintain the existing hours on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, and Saturday, but would add Sunday hours from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., a day the courts are current ly closed. Option 1 would result in an additional seven hours of court access, totaling 52 hours overall of court access throughout the week. Additional benefits would include: Increased high-demand and resident access periods by adding Sunday hours as it would result in court access opportunities for working professionals. Increased membership sales, member retention, and reservations due to additional court access, leading to approximately $4,000 in additional revenue annually. Reduced court crowding and wait times. Maintaining relief to the nearby residents one day a week, and several evenings. Proposed Operating Hours: Option 2 Page 633 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 14 of 15 In Option 2, staff propose adjusting the Kelly Pickleball Court hours of operation to 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily. In comparison to the current hours, Option 2 would result in an additional 39 hours of court access, totaling 84 hours overall of court access throughout the week. Additional benefits would include: Aligns with the Kelly Pickleball Court hours with the Kelly Tennis and Basketball Courts. Maximizes community access and better meets overall recreational demand. Aligns with the growing sport popularity and comparable cities hours in the area. Increased membership sales, member retention, and reservations due to additional court access, leading to approximately $36,900 in additional revenue annually. Reduced court crowding and wait times. Attachment 2 is the revised Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy with Option 1’s proposed court hours of operation. Attachment 3 is the revised policy with Option 2’s proposed court hours of operation. It should be noted, the Department plans to establish a new Adult Pickleball League on Thursdays from 6:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. and once established such programming would reduce court access for member reservations or open walk-on play by three hours weekly. Creating such a league aligns with the goals outlined in the Parks Master Plan for pickleball programming, including classes and organized leagues, and is anticipated to generate approximately $10,000 in annual revenue from registration fees. Fiscal Impact: Depending on the option selected by City Council pertaining to the Kelly Pickleball Court hours of operation, anticipated revenue would be as follows per each option: Option 1 – Expanding hours to include Sundays (9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.), along with the proposed Adult Pickleball League on Thursday evenings is projected to generate approximately $4,000 in additional annual revenue, bringing total estimated annual revenue to $46,900, reflecting combined revenue from memberships and member reservations. Option 2 – Extending court hours to 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily is projected to generate approximately $36,900 in additional revenue annually, bringing total estimated annual revenue to $79,800, reflecting combined revenue from memberships and member reservations. Option 3 – Maintaining the court hours (Commission recommendation) is projected to maintain existing annual revenue from memberships and member reservations, totaling approximately $42,900 annually. Page 634 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 15 of 15 Additionally, the Kelly Pickleball Courts are currently projected to reopen at the end of April 2026, so revenue projections will be offset in 2026 as a result of the facility full closure for 33 percent of the year. Furthermore, across all three options, the Adult Pickleball League is projected to generate approximately $10,000 in additional annual General Fund revenue, with potential to further increase with additional court use hours. Attachments: 1. Current Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy 2. Option 1 Revised Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy 3. Option 2 Revised Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy Respectfully Submitted by: Brian J. Sousa, Senior Recreation Supervisor Concur: Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 635 of 1126 Page 1 of 2 KELLY PICKLEBALL AND TENNIS COURTS USE POLICY City of Hermosa Beach • Parks and Recreation Department 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0280 hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov PICKLEBALL COURTS The Pickleball Courts are available to the public with the purpose of balancing both recreational and instructional play. RULES AND REGULATIONS 1. Hours of operation: Tuesday from 9:00am-9:00pm, Wednesday from 9:00am-4:00pm, Thursday from 9:00am- 9:00pm, Friday from 9:00am-4:00pm and Saturday from 9:00am-4:00pm. The courts are closed on Sunday and Monday. 2. Only traditional pickleball play is permitted unless otherwise approved by the Parks & Recreation Department. 3. City-sponsored activities have priority over all reservations on all courts. 4. All classes, tournaments, instruction and organized activity of any kind must be approved by the Parks & Recreation Department. 5. Courts 1 and 2 remain open for reservations and walk-on play. Courts 3 and 4 are closed. 6. Reservations may be made by Hermosa Beach residents only. 7. Reserved times are posted on each court and are updated on a daily basis. 8. Without a reservation, courts are available on a first-come, first-served basis and free of charge. 9. Singles and doubles play is permitted. 10. A maximum of one-hour play is allowed on heavy traffic days and when others are waiting to play. 11. Minors must always be accompanied by a parent/guardian. 12. Pickleball etiquette shall always prevail. 13. Only approved equipment outlined in the Kelly Courts Use Policy is allowed. 14. Tennis shoes must be worn while on the courts. No black sole shoes are permitted. 15. No food or glass containers allowed inside the court area. 16. No chalk or paint is to be used on the courts. 17. Pets are not permitted in the court areas at any time. 18. Report any court damage or vandalism to the Parks & Recreation Department immediately. 19. Play at your own risk. ETIQUETTE • Players of all levels are welcome. • USA Pickleball Association official rules shall govern play. • When serving, players should call the score. This lets the receiver know the player is ready to serve and helps all players keep track of the score. • All players are required to leave the court after one hour’s worth of play, allowing the next players their turn to play. • When leaving the court, players must be courteous to others still playing and wait until their point is over before walking around nearby courts. • Each player should be ready and available to enter the court when it is their turn to play. • Players must not use offensive language while using the courts. EQUIPMENT • Only paddles with a polypropylene or composite core and a fiberglass, graphite or composite face are permitted for use. No wood or aluminum paddles may be used. • Balls made of foam are encouraged for use during casual games, drills, or practice. The use of Dura Fast pickleballs is not permitted. RESERVATIONS • Residents must purchase an annual Pickleball Membership in order to make reservations. • Pickleball Memberships can be purchased through the Parks & Recreation Department, Monday-Thursday from 7:00am-6:00pm. Pickleball Membership Applications may be submitted in person or electronically by e-mail to hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov. Proof of residency is required and may be provided with a photo I.D. with the current Hermosa Beach address. If the photo I.D. does not include the current Hermosa Beach address, a utility bill dated within the last 30 days will also be required. • Reservations are given on a first-come, first-serve basis and can be made at least one day prior but not more than four (4) days in advance for two (2) hours maximum per day. The online reservation system will open at 7:00am on the first accepted advance day. • Reservations can be made by e-mail to hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov during office hours; Monday-Thursday from 7:00am-6:00pm or through the online reservation system 24 hours a day, seven days a week. • Payment is due at the time a reservation is made. • Reservations can only be modified on the same day they are made and modifications can only be made during office hours; Monday-Thursday from 7:00am-6:00pm by e-mail to hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov. • Refunds will only be granted for inclement weather. Members are responsible for notifying the office of cancellations due to weather conditions within 24 hours of the cancelled date . TENNIS COURT Page 636 of 1126 Page 2 of 2 The Tennis Court is available to the public for recreational play only. RULES AND REGULATIONS 1. Hours of operation: Sunday to Monday, from 9:00am-9:00pm. You can access the court from Valley Drive or by entering the basketball courts. Entry from pickleball court will be locked. 2. Only traditional tennis play is permitted unless otherwise approved by the Parks & Recreation Department. 3. City-sponsored activities have priority over all reservations on all courts. 4. All classes, tournaments, instruction and organized activity of any kind must be approved by the Parks & Recreation Department. 5. Courts are available on a first-come, first-served basis and free of charge. 6. Singles and doubles play is permitted. 7. Minors must always be accompanied by a parent/guardian. 8. Tennis etiquette shall always prevail. 9. Tennis shoes must be worn while on the courts. No black sole shoes are permitted. 10. No food or glass containers allowed inside the court area. 11. No chalk or paint is to be used on the courts. 12. Pets are not permitted in the court areas at any time. 13. Report any court damage or vandalism to the Parks & Recreation Department immediately. 14. Play at your own risk. Page 637 of 1126 Page 1 of 2 KELLY PICKLEBALL AND TENNIS COURTS USE POLICY City of Hermosa Beach • Parks & Recreation Department 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0280 hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov Office Hours: Monday–Thursday 7:00 am–6:00 pm PICKLEBALL COURTS The Pickleball Courts are available to the public with a balance of recreational and instructional play. RULES AND REGULATIONS 1. Hours of Operation: o Sunday, Wednesday, Friday, & Saturday: 9:00 am–4:00 pm o Tuesday & Thursday: 9:00 am–9:00 pm o Monday: Closed 2. Only traditional pickleball play is permitted unless otherwise approved by the Parks & Recreation Department. 3. Singles and doubles play is permitted. 4. A maximum of one-hour play is allowed; challenges are welcomed when others are waiting to play. 5. City-sponsored activities have priority over all reservations on all courts. 6. All classes, tournaments, instruction, and organized activities require prior approval by the Parks & Recreation Department. 7. Courts 1 & 2 are available for reservations and walk-on play. Courts 3 & 4 are designated for walk-on play only. 8. Reservations may be made by Hermosa Beach residents only. 9. Reserved times are posted on each court and are updated on a daily basis. 10. Without a reservation, courts are available on a first-come, first-served basis and free of charge. 11. Minors must be accompanied at all times by a parent or legal guardian. 12. Pickleball etiquette and sportsmanship shall always be present. 13. Only approved equipment outlined in the Kelly Courts Use Policy is allowed. 14. Pets are not permitted in the court areas at any time. 15. Users of the pickleball courts are expected to maintain the integrity and cleanliness of the courts at all times. The following items and actions are strictly prohibited: o Food and beverages in glass containers o Chalk, paint, or other markings on the court surface o Any acts of defacing, damaging, or altering the court or signage in any way 16. Report any court damage or vandalism through the City’s GoHermosa! App immediately. 17. The City reserves the right to close the courts at any time due to inclement weather, maintenance needs, or unsafe conditions. 18. Play at your own risk. 19. Violation of these rules and regulations may result in suspension of court privileges and/or other enforcement actions as determined by the Parks & Recreation Department. EQUIPMENT 1. Only paddles specifically designed for pickleball are permitted. Paddles must have a polypropylene or composite core and a fiberglass, graphite, or composite face. Wood, aluminum, metal, stringed, modified, or homemade paddles are prohibited. 2. Pickleball balls that create excessive noise, pose safety concerns, or risk damage to the court surface are prohibited. Dura Fast pickleballs are not permitted. 3. Use of foam pickleballs is encouraged for casual play, drills, or instructional purposes, as approved by the Parks & Recreation Department. 4. Court Protection: The Parks & Recreation Department reserves the authority to determine whether equipment complies with this policy. RESERVATIONS 1. Hermosa Beach residents must hold a valid annual Pickleball Membership to reserve a court. 2. Pickleball Memberships may be purchased through the Parks & Recreation Department during office hours. Membership applications may be submitted in person or electronically by email to hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov. Proof of residency is required and may be provided by a government-issued photo identification showing a current Hermosa Beach address. If the photo identification does not reflect a current Hermosa Beach address, a utility bill dated within the past 30 days must also be submitted. 3. Reservations are issued on a first-come, first-served basis and may be made no sooner than one day and no more than four days in advance, for a maximum of two hours per member, per day by email to hbconnect@hermosabeach.oc or through the online reservation system. The online reservation system opens at 7:00 am on the earliest eligible advance reservation day. 4. All reservation fees are due at the time the reservation is made. 5. Reservations may only be modified on the same calendar day they are made and must be modified during office hours by email to hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov. 6. Refunds will only be issued due to inclement weather or City -initiated court closures. Members are responsible for notifying the Parks & Recreation Department within 24 hours of the cancelled reservation date to be eligible for a refund. 7. The City reserves the right to cancel or modify reservations due to maintenance needs, unsafe conditions, or City-sponsored activities. Page 638 of 1126 Page 2 of 2 TENNIS COURT The Tennis Court is available to the public for recreational play only. RULES AND REGULATIONS 1. Hours of Operation: 9:00 am–9:00 pm daily. 2. Only traditional tennis play is permitted unless otherwise approved by the Parks & Recreation Department. 3. City-sponsored activities have priority over all reservations on all courts. 4. All classes, tournaments, instruction, and organized activities require prior approval by the Parks & Recreation Department. 5. The court is available for walk-on play on a first-come, first-served basis and free of charge. 6. Singles and doubles play is permitted. 7. Outside of individual play, a maximum of six balls are permitted on the court. 8. Minors must always be accompanied by a parent/guardian. 9. A maximum of one-hour play is allowed when others are waiting to play. 10. Tennis etiquette and sportsmanship shall always be present. 11. Pets are not permitted in the court areas at any time. 12. Users of the tennis courts are expected to maintain the integrity and cleanliness of the courts at all times. The following items and actions are strictly prohibited: o Food and beverages in glass containers o Chalk, paint, or other markings on the court surface o Any acts of defacing, damaging, or altering the court and signage in any way 13. Report any court damage or vandalism through the City’s GoHermosa! App immediately. 14. The City reserves the right to close the court at any time due to inclement weather, maintenance needs, or unsafe conditions. 15. Play at your own risk. 16. Violation of these rules and regulations may result in suspension of court privileges and/or other enforcement actions as determined by the Parks & Recreation Department. Page 639 of 1126 Page 1 of 2 KELLY PICKLEBALL AND TENNIS COURTS USE POLICY City of Hermosa Beach • Parks & Recreation Department 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0280 hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov Office Hours: Monday–Thursday 7:00 am–6:00 pm PICKLEBALL COURTS The Pickleball Courts are available to the public with a balance of recreational and instructional play. RULES AND REGULATIONS 1. Hours of Operation: 9:00 am–9:00 pm daily. 2. Only traditional pickleball play is permitted unless otherwise approved by the Parks & Recreation Department. 3. Singles and doubles play is permitted. 4. A maximum of one-hour play is allowed; challenges are welcomed when others are waiting to play. 5. City-sponsored activities have priority over all reservations on all courts. 6. All classes, tournaments, instruction, and organized activities require prior approval by the Parks & Recreation Department. 7. Courts 1 & 2 are available for reservations and walk-on play. Courts 3 & 4 are designated for walk-on play only. 8. Reservations may be made by Hermosa Beach residents only. 9. Reserved times are posted on each court and are updated on a daily basis. 10. Without a reservation, courts are available on a first-come, first-served basis and free of charge. 11. Minors must be accompanied at all times by a parent or legal guardian. 12. Pickleball etiquette and sportsmanship shall always be present. 13. Only approved equipment outlined in the Kelly Courts Use Policy is allowed. 14. Pets are not permitted in the court areas at any time. 15. Users of the pickleball courts are expected to maintain the integrity and cleanliness of the courts at all times. The following items and actions are strictly prohibited: o Food and beverages in glass containers o Chalk, paint, or other markings on the court surface o Any acts of defacing, damaging, or altering the court or signage in any way 16. Report any court damage or vandalism through the City’s GoHermosa! App immediately. 17. The City reserves the right to close the courts at any time due to inclement weather, maintenance needs, or unsafe conditions. 18. Play at your own risk. 19. Violation of these rules and regulations may result in suspension of court privileges and/or other enforcement actions as determined by the Parks & Recreation Department. EQUIPMENT 1. Only paddles specifically designed for pickleball are permitted. Paddles must have a polypropylene or composite core and a fiberglass, graphite, or composite face. Wood, aluminum, metal, stringed, modified, or homemade paddles are prohibited. 2. Pickleball balls that create excessive noise, pose safety concerns, or risk damage to the court surface are prohibited. Dura Fast pickleballs are not permitted. 3. Use of foam pickleballs is encouraged for casual play, drills, or instructional purposes, as approved by the Parks & Recreation Department. 4. Court Protection: The Parks & Recreation Department reserves the authority to determine whether equipment complies with this policy. RESERVATIONS 1. Hermosa Beach residents must hold a valid annual Pickleball Membership to reserve a court. 2. Pickleball Memberships may be purchased through the Parks & Recreation Department during office hours. Membership applications may be submitted in person or electronically by email to hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov. Proof of residency is required and may be provided by a government-issued photo identification showing a current Hermosa Beach address. If the photo identification does not reflect a current Hermosa Beach address, a utility bill dated within the past 30 days must also be submitted. 3. Reservations are issued on a first-come, first-served basis and may be made no sooner than one day and no more than four days in advance, for a maximum of two hours per member, per day by email to hbconnect@hermosabeach.oc or through the online reservation system. The online reservation system opens at 7:00 am on the earliest eligible advance reservation day. 4. All reservation fees are due at the time the reservation is made. 5. Reservations may only be modified on the same calendar day they are made and must be modified during office hours by email to hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov. 6. Refunds will only be issued due to inclement weather or City -initiated court closures. Members are responsible for notifying the Parks & Recreation Department within 24 hours of the cancelled reservation date to be eligible for a refund. 7. The City reserves the right to cancel or modify reservations due to maintenance needs, unsafe conditions, or City-sponsored activities. TENNIS COURT The Tennis Court is available to the public for recreational play only. Page 640 of 1126 Page 2 of 2 RULES AND REGULATIONS 1. Hours of Operation: 9:00 am–9:00 pm daily. 2. Only traditional tennis play is permitted unless otherwise approved by the Parks & Recreation Department. 3. City-sponsored activities have priority over all reservations on all courts. 4. All classes, tournaments, instruction, and organized activities require prior approval by the Parks & Recreation Department. 5. The court is available for walk-on play on a first-come, first-served basis and free of charge. 6. Singles and doubles play is permitted. 7. Outside of individual play, a maximum of six balls are permitted on the court. 8. Minors must always be accompanied by a parent/guardian. 9. A maximum of one-hour play is allowed when others are waiting to play. 10. Tennis etiquette and sportsmanship shall always be present. 11. Pets are not permitted in the court areas at any time. 12. Users of the tennis courts are expected to maintain the integrity and cleanliness of the courts at all times. The following items and actions are strictly prohibited: o Food and beverages in glass containers o Chalk, paint, or other markings on the court surface o Any acts of defacing, damaging, or altering the court and signage in any way 13. Report any court damage or vandalism through the City’s GoHermosa! App immediately. 14. The City reserves the right to close the court at any time due to inclement weather, maintenance needs, or unsafe conditions. 15. Play at your own risk. 16. Violation of these rules and regulations may result in suspension of court privileges and/or other enforcement actions as determined by the Parks & Recreation Department. Page 641 of 1126 PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS October 6, 2025 Meeting Page 642 of 1126 SUMMARY Following completion of Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 619, staff requests revisions to the Kelly Courts – Pickleball Courts policies including, modifying the open hours of operations, updating the language for permissible equipment usage, and designating courts 1 and 2 for reservation and open walk-on play while courts 3 and 4 remain open walk-on play only at Clark Complex. Page 643 of 1126 BACKGROUND •In summary, Pickleball is a racquet sport that combines elements of tennis, badminton, and ping pong and has substantially grown in popularity continuously over the last decade with increased local demand among Hermosa Beach residents •In March 2017, following extensive community engagement, City Council approved the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission (Commission) recommendation of converting one of the two Kelly Tennis Courts at the Clark Complex into four dedicated pickleball courts. • Two courts were closed in 2020 due to potential safety issues and litigation. Page 644 of 1126 BACKGROUND •Following the opening of the Pickleball Courts, staff and the former Department Use Policies Subcommittee (DUPS) of the Commission formed a community stakeholder focus group to discuss viable solutions that would limit noise impacts to the nearby residents while providing use of the pickleball courts during preferred times by the pickleball community. •At its June 2, 2021 meeting, staff and DUPS requested the Commission recommend to City Council the approval of updated use policies and hours, formed with the Pickleball Stakeholders Focus Group. •At its July 13, 2021 meeting, City Council approved the Commission’s recommendation on the updated use policies but revised the hours, allowing for more hours for use of the courts than initially recommended by the Commission. Page 645 of 1126 BACKGROUND •Since staff’s report in 2021, staff have received feedback from members of the pickleball community expressing their dissatisfaction with the limited court use hours, limited availability of open play, and inability to secure a reservation with limitations of temporarily closure of two pickleball courts. The courts are available for reservation by residents who obtain a pickleball membership, otherwise, available on an open walk-on play basis, free of charge. However, the courts are reserved 98% of the time, and obtaining a reservation is very competitive due to the high demand. •Staff has received a concern from one nearby resident of the pickleball courts being used outside of the adopted court use hours and general noise complaints, otherwise, Staff have not directly received any additional feedback or concern about noise impacts to date. Page 646 of 1126 BACKGROUND Parks Master Plan At its November 12, 2024 meeting, City Council approved and adopted the 2024 Parks Master Plan. The project underwent a robust community engagement process, highlighted the growing demand for pickleball and the desire for additional facilities, while also acknowledging the need to balance schedules for open play, reservations, and enhance programming. Page 647 of 1126 BACKGROUND •At the February 10, 2026 Commission meeting, staff recommended Commission consider a recommendation to City Council to approve modifications to the Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy. Staff also requested the Commission consider one of the following options to modify the courts’ hours of operation: •Option 1: •Monday: Closed •Tuesday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. •Wednesday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. •Thursday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. •Friday–Sunday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. •Option 2: •9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily. Commission approved staff’s recommendation with the exception of the recommended options to modify the courts’ hours of operation. Instead, the Commission recommended that City Council consider approval of maintaining the facility hours as currently designated. Page 648 of 1126 DISCUSSION •The current hours of operations for the Pickleball Courts are: •Tuesday and Thursday: 9:00 a.m. through 9:00 p.m. •Wednesday and Friday-Saturday: 9:00 a.m. through 4:00 p.m. •Sunday-Monday: closed •The functions of the Parks and Recreation Department (Department) are to provide opportunities for educational, recreational, cultural, and social service activities and resources for all age groups, to develop and maintain the City’s leisure areas and facilities in an attractive and safe manner, and to ensure that such facilities are suitable for a wide variety of purposes. Page 649 of 1126 DISCUSSION •The sport of Pickleball has grown in popularity over the years since the last policy updates. For example, the Major League Pickleball (MLP) was founded in 2021, and in 2024 merged forming the United Pickleball Association (UPA). •Pickleball is recognized as the fastest growing sport in America and in the field of Parks & Recreation. The sport saw a 52% increase in participation from 2022 to 2023 alone, an estimated 23 million active players in 2025. Most notable growth among ages 25–34 (not just seniors), and working- class adults. According to the most recent census reporting, 25% of Hermosa Beach residents are ages 25–39, and 58% are ages 25–59. Page 650 of 1126 DISCUSSION •The Kelly Pickleball Courts have high local demand and limited hours. Included in Table 1 below are the annual Pickleball memberships purchased along with the associated revenue from memberships and member court reservations since the creation of the Pickleball Membership Program. Page 651 of 1126 DISCUSSION •In addition, staff performed best practice research of comparable cities’ including the hours of operation and total number of dedicated courts available (Table 2). •All comparable cities operate 7 days a week, on an drop-in play and reservation basis Page 652 of 1126 DISCUSSION (Table 2) Continued: Page 653 of 1126 DISCUSSION •Reduce/limited daily operating hours have created constraints on court availability, which can impact membership growth, drop-in participation, and overall user experience. Expanding the operating hours in Hermosa Beach would better align court availability with neighboring cities, meet current demand, foster continued growth. Page 654 of 1126 •Proposed Operating Hours: Option 1 •Wednesday, Friday to Sunday: 9:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Tuesday and Thursday: 9:00 a.m. – 9:00 p.m. with Monday closed. •Benefits and Projected Impact could include: Maintains the current evening access only two days a week Increases high-demand and resident access periods by adding Sunday providing inclusive/equitable time to play working professionals Maintains manageable staffing resources Increased membership sales & retention, and reservations, leading to estimated $4,000 in additional revenue annually. Reduced court crowding and wait times Maintaining relief to the nearby residents one day a week (closed Mon) Attachment 2 Page 655 of 1126 •Proposed Operating Hours: Option 2 •Open 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily •Benefits and Projected Impact could include: Aligns with Kelly Courts - tennis and basketball court hours Maximum community access and further meet the recreational demand Aligns with the growing sport popularity and comparable cities’ Supports development of leagues, lessons, and expanded programming Increased membership sales, member retention, and reservations due to additional court access, leading to approximately $36,900 in additional revenue annually Reduced court crowding and wait times Attachment 3 Page 656 of 1126 •Proposed Operating Hours: Option 3 Commission recommended that City Council consider approval of maintaining the facility hours as currently designated, which are: •Sunday and Monday: Closed •Tuesday from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. •Wednesday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. •Thursday from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. •Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. •Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The Commission also requested, if the recommendation was approved by City Council to maintain the current facility hours, staff report back to the Commission within 120 days following reopening with a report on complaints, community feedback, and court usage. Commissioners expressed the following : •The reopening of the two previously closed pickleball courts concern that this could potentially increase noise impacts to nearby residents. •The close proximity of nearby residences to the pickleball courts compared to the location of pickleball courts in other local cities, where facilities may be situated farther from residential areas.Page 657 of 1126 DISCUSSION In response to Commissions concerns, Staff notes: •reopening of the two previously closed courts would restore the facility to its originally intended configuration of four courts; •regarding the proximity of the courts to nearby residences, staff conducted a review of comparable pickleball facilities in neighboring cities. The analysis found that pickleball courts in surrounding communities are generally located between approximately 60-350 feet (ft.) Local cities examples are provided in Table 3. Page 658 of 1126 DISCUSSION In comparison, the Kelly Pickleball Courts in Hermosa Beach are located approximately 190–480 ft. from nearby residences, which places the facility within or beyond the range observed at comparable facilities in neighboring jurisdictions Page 659 of 1126 FISCAL IMPACT Projected revenue would be as follows per each option: • Option 1 – Expanding hours to include Sundays (9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) Thursday evenings is projected to generate approximately $14,000 in additional annual revenue, bringing total estimated annual revenue to $46,900, reflecting combined revenue from memberships and member reservations, and the Adult Sports Pickleball League. • Option 2 – Extending court hours to 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily is projected, along with the proposed to generate approximately $36,900 in additional annual revnue, bringing total estimated annual revenue to $79,800, reflecting combined revenue from memberships and member reservations. • Option 3 – Maintaining the court hours (Commission) is projected to maintain existing annual revenue from member- ships and reservations, totaling approximately $42,900 annually.Page 660 of 1126 Recommendation To further align with the department’s mission of providing equitable recreational opportunities and services to the community, staff requests City Council to consider approval of court use policy revisions; including modifications to the hours of operation for the Kelly Courts – Pickleball Courts, designating courts 1 and 2 for reservation and open walk-on play while courts 3 and 4 remain open walk-on play only, and updating the language for equipment. Goal: to enhance public utilization to the newly renovated facility invested by the City and incorporate objectives set-forth through the Parks Master Plan. Page 661 of 1126 Page 662 of 1126 Page 663 of 1126 Page 664 of 1126 Page 665 of 1126 Page 666 of 1126 Page 667 of 1126 Page 668 of 1126 Page 669 of 1126 Page 670 of 1126 Page 671 of 1126 Page 672 of 1126 Page 673 of 1126 Page 674 of 1126 Page 675 of 1126 Page 676 of 1126 Page 677 of 1126 Page 678 of 1126 Page 679 of 1126 Page 680 of 1126 Page 681 of 1126 Page 682 of 1126 Page 683 of 1126 Page 684 of 1126 Page 685 of 1126 Page 686 of 1126 Page 687 of 1126 Page 688 of 1126 Page 689 of 1126 Page 690 of 1126 Page 691 of 1126 Page 692 of 1126 Page 693 of 1126 Page 694 of 1126 Page 695 of 1126 Page 696 of 1126 Page 697 of 1126 Page 698 of 1126 Page 699 of 1126 Page 700 of 1126 Page 701 of 1126 Page 702 of 1126 Page 703 of 1126 Page 704 of 1126 Page 705 of 1126 Page 706 of 1126 Page 707 of 1126 Page 708 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PW-011 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ON-CALL SANITARY SEWER AND VIDEO INSPECTION SERVICES WITH EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING AND EQUIPMENT, INC. CEQA: The action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5). (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Determine the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5); 2. Approve the proposed amendment to the agreement with Empire Pipe Cleaning and Equipment, Inc. to provide sanitary sewer hydro-flushing and video inspection maintenance services, extending the contract term through June 30, 2027, increasing the total base contract amount by $255,696, and increasing contract total from $793,490 to $1,049,186 (Attachment 1); 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to increase the annual project contingency from $10,000 per year to $15,000 per year for Fiscal Year (FY) 26-27; and 4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendment, approve minor non-substantive modifications if necessary, and execute a ll related documents, with the City Clerk attesting to the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney. Executive Summary: At its May 10, 2022, meeting, City Council awarded a maintenance services agreement to Empire Pipe Cleaning and Equipment, Inc. (Empire) for sanitary sewer maintenance services following a competitive solicitation process (Attachment 2). The term for this agreement is currently set to expire on June 30, 2026. Staff requests approval of the proposed amendment to extend the term of the agreement by one year to June 30, 2027, increase the not-to-exceed contract amount by $255,696, thereby increasing the contract total from $793,490 to $1,049,186. Staff also requests an increase in the annual project contingency from $10,000 to $15,000 to better address unforeseen sewer cleaning needs. Approval of the amendment will ensure uninterrupted sewer system maintenance. Page 709 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 3 Background: The City owns, operates, and maintains approximately thirty-seven miles of sewer mains and 880 sewer maintenance access holes. The Public Works Department relies on specialized sewer maintenance contractors to perform hydro -flushing and closed-circuit television (CCTV) inspection services as part of a comprehensive preventative maintenance strategy. This practice helps maintain proper sewer operations, extend the infrastructure service life, greatly reduces the risk of sanitary sewer overflows, protects public health, and reduces potential for damage to private and public property that could result from system blockages. On March 24, 2022, the City issued a Request for Proposals for sanitary sewer maintenance services for FY 22-23 through FY 25-26, with an optional one-year extension. On May 10, 2022, the City Council awarded the contract to Empire as the most qualified and cost-effective bidder. Past Council Action Meeting Date Description May 10, 2022 Council awarded contract to Empire Pipe Cleaning and Equipment, Inc. for Sanitary Sewer Maintenance and CCTV Inspection Services Discussion: The current agreement will expire on June 30, 2026, and the contract is approaching its authorized spending limit as the approved contract amount only covered the period from FY 22-23 through FY 25-26. Continued services are necessary to ensure the sewer system is properly maintained and to assist staff if there is an emergency blockage. To ensure thorough preventative maintenance of the City’s sewer system, staff is proposing to increase the overall linear feet of the annual cleaning from 211,000 to 250,000 linear feet and increase the scheduled second cleanings of trouble spots from 15,000 to 30,000 linear feet. Staff recommends these increases to better reflect what is required to maintain the system, while providing flexibility, particularly for troub le spot locations which are typically the result of grease build -up. Cleanings are all billed based on work completed per a unit price; therefore, the City would only be billed for the work completed. Staff solicited updated rates from Empire for the new fiscal year and negotiated unit price increases ranging between 2.8% and 3.5% per line item, which are at, or below, the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Staff has evaluated contractor performance and finds Empire to be responsive, reliable, and highly knowledgeable about the City’s system. The proposed extension at or below- CPI rate increases provides strong value while ensuring service continuity. Page 710 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 3 Staff intends to release a new Request for Proposals during FY 26 -27 for services beginning in FY 27-28. Environmental Impact: The proposed action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5), as it consists of administrative activities that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment. The amendment pertains to ongoing sewer maintenance services within existing infrastructure. Fiscal Impact: The proposed first amendment extends the service contract one more year for FY 26-27 at a cost of $255,696 for the base contract. In addition, staff is seeking Council approval of a $15,000 contingency to cover as-needed emergency services for a total of $270,696. Staff will budget the upcoming FY 26-27 extension year service cost as part of the upcoming FY 26-27 budget in anticipated available Sewer Funds. Agreement Modification Request Agreement Current Authorized Amount Modified Request Amount FY 2026-27 Budget Dept. Account # Total Revised Contract Amount PW -MSA 22-003 $793,490 $255,696 160-3102-4201 $1,049,186 Attachments: 1. First Amendment to the Agreement with Empire Pipe Cleaning and Equipment, Inc. 2. Empire Pipe Cleaning and Equipment, Inc. fully executed contract Respectfully Submitted by: Michael Dell’Amico, Management Analyst Concur: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 711 of 1126 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 FIRST AMENDMENT TO MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING AND EQUIPMENT, INC. This First Amendment to the Maintenance Services Agreement for sanitary sewer and video inspection maintenance services (“First Amendment”) is made and entered into as of March [__], 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Hermosa Beach (a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254) (“City”) and Empire Pipe Cleaning and Equipment, Inc. (a California corporation with its principal place of business at 1788 N Neville Street, Orange, California 92865) (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are hereinafter sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. RECITALS A. The Parties entered an agreement dated May 10, 2022 (“Agreement”), for Consultant to provide sanitary sewer and video inspection maintenance services for the City’s sewer management and maintenance operations program (“Services”); and B. The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the compensation for the continued performance of the Services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties mutually agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals listed above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Amendment. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows: a. Time of Performance. Section 2 is revised by replacing the Page 712 of 1126 date “June 30, 2026” with the date “June 30, 2027”. b. Payment of Services. Section 3 is revised by amending the not to exceed compensation rates as set forth in Exhibit A -1 (Payment for Services for Fiscal Year 2026-2027), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this First Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect; and shall govern the actions of the Parties under this First Amendment. Whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the original Agreement from and after the date of this First Amendment, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this First Amendment. 4. Electronic Transmission. A manually signed copy of this First Amendment which is transmitted by facsimile, electronic mail, or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this First Amendment for all purposes. This First Amendment may be signed using an electronic signature. 5. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this First Amendment on the Effective Date. Page 713 of 1126 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVED BY: Steve Napolitano City Manager Attested By: Ann Yang Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jason Baltimore Interim City Attorney EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING AND EQUIPMENT, INC. Craig Van Thyne Vice President Exhibit A-1: Payment of Services for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 EXHIBIT A-1: PAYMENT OF SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 Page 714 of 1126 5TH Year July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027 Base Proposal Item No. Est. Quantity Description Unit Price Total 1 250,000 LF Sewer-Line Hydro-Flush (scheduled initial cleaning of City sewer system) $0.71 $177,500.00 2 60 HR Emergency after Hours (two-hour response time) $414.50 $24,870.00 3 5,000 HR CCTV Inspections $0.88 $4,400.00 Page 715 of 1126 4 60 HR Extra Call out Cleaning Services (during normal work hours, not part of scheduled cleaning) $347.10 $20,826.00 5 30,000 LF Additional Sewer-Line Hydro-Flush (Scheduled second cleaning of certain sewer segments) $0.92 $27,600.00 6 1 LS Public Noticing $500.00 $500.00 Total (Base Proposal) $255,696.00 TOTAL AMOUNT BASE PROPOSAL IN FIGURES: $255,696.00 TOTAL AMOUNT BASE PROPOSAL IN WORDS: Two-Hundred Fifty-Five thousand six- hundred ninety-six dollars and zero cents. In the event of a conflict between the numbers given in figures and in words, the words shall control. Page 716 of 1126 Page 717 of 1126 Page 718 of 1126 Page 719 of 1126 Page 720 of 1126 Page 721 of 1126 Page 722 of 1126 Page 723 of 1126 Page 724 of 1126 Page 725 of 1126 Page 726 of 1126 Page 727 of 1126 Page 728 of 1126 Page 729 of 1126 Page 730 of 1126 Page 731 of 1126 Page 732 of 1126 Page 733 of 1126 Page 734 of 1126 Page 735 of 1126 Page 736 of 1126 Page 737 of 1126 Page 738 of 1126 Page 739 of 1126 Page 740 of 1126 Page 741 of 1126 Page 742 of 1126 Page 743 of 1126 Page 744 of 1126 Page 745 of 1126 Page 746 of 1126 Page 747 of 1126 Page 748 of 1126 Page 749 of 1126 Page 750 of 1126 Page 751 of 1126 Page 752 of 1126 Page 753 of 1126 Page 754 of 1126 Page 755 of 1126 Page 756 of 1126 Page 757 of 1126 Page 758 of 1126 Page 759 of 1126 Page 760 of 1126 Page 761 of 1126 Page 762 of 1126 Page 763 of 1126 Page 764 of 1126 Page 765 of 1126 Page 766 of 1126 Page 767 of 1126 Page 768 of 1126 Page 769 of 1126 Page 770 of 1126 Page 771 of 1126 Page 772 of 1126 Page 773 of 1126 Page 774 of 1126 Page 775 of 1126 Page 776 of 1126 Page 777 of 1126 Page 778 of 1126 Page 779 of 1126 Page 780 of 1126 Page 781 of 1126 Page 782 of 1126 Page 783 of 1126 Page 784 of 1126 Page 785 of 1126 Page 786 of 1126 Page 787 of 1126 Page 788 of 1126 Page 789 of 1126 Page 790 of 1126 Page 791 of 1126 Page 792 of 1126 Page 793 of 1126 Page 794 of 1126 Page 795 of 1126 Page 796 of 1126 Page 797 of 1126 Page 798 of 1126 Page 799 of 1126 Page 800 of 1126 Page 801 of 1126 Page 802 of 1126 Page 803 of 1126 Page 804 of 1126 Page 805 of 1126 Page 806 of 1126 Page 807 of 1126 Page 808 of 1126 Page 809 of 1126 Page 810 of 1126 Page 811 of 1126 Page 812 of 1126 Page 813 of 1126 Page 814 of 1126 Page 815 of 1126 Page 816 of 1126 Page 817 of 1126 Page 818 of 1126 Page 819 of 1126 Page 820 of 1126 Page 821 of 1126 Page 822 of 1126 Page 823 of 1126 Page 824 of 1126 Page 825 of 1126 Page 826 of 1126 Page 827 of 1126 Page 828 of 1126 Page 829 of 1126 Page 830 of 1126 Page 831 of 1126 Page 832 of 1126 Page 833 of 1126 Page 834 of 1126 Page 835 of 1126 Page 836 of 1126 Page 837 of 1126 Page 838 of 1126 Page 839 of 1126 Page 840 of 1126 Page 841 of 1126 Page 842 of 1126 Page 843 of 1126 Page 844 of 1126 Page 845 of 1126 Page 846 of 1126 Page 847 of 1126 Page 848 of 1126 Page 849 of 1126 Page 850 of 1126 Page 851 of 1126 Page 852 of 1126 Page 853 of 1126 Page 854 of 1126 Page 855 of 1126 Page 856 of 1126 Page 857 of 1126 Page 858 of 1126 APPROVE FIRST AMENDMENT TO MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ON-CALL SEWER AND VIDEO INSPECTION SERVICES WITH EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING AND EQUIPMENT, INC. MARCH 24, 2026 Page 859 of 1126 Background May 10, 2022, Council awarded a 4-year agreement to Empire Pipe Cleaning and Equipment, Inc. Contract expires June 30, 2026. Option to extend 1 additional year. Scope includes maintenance of ~37 miles of sewer and 880 access holes. Page 860 of 1126 Discussion Staff solicited and negotiated new rates with Empire. Increases to cover higher labor costs. Unit price increases range from 2.8% to 3.5%. Increasing quantity to better align with need: Annual cleaning increase from 211,000 to 250,000 linear feet (lf). Trouble spot cleaning increase from 15,000 to 30,000 lf Page 861 of 1126 Discussion Proposed increase in total base contract amount by $255,696, and the total contract amount from $793,490 to $1,049,186. Seeking increase in annual project contingency from $10,000 to $15,000 for FY 26-27. Staff anticipates releasing a new Requests for Proposal (RFP) in FY 26-27 for services starting FY 27-28. Page 862 of 1126 Recommendations 1.Determine the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5); 2.Approve proposed amendment to agreement with Empire Pipe Cleaning and Equipment, Inc. to provide sanitary sewer hydro-flushing & video inspection maintenance services, extending contract term to June 30, 2027, increasing total base contract amount by $255,696, and increasing contract total from $793,490 to $1,049,186; 3.Authorize the Director of Public Works to increase the annual project contingency from $10,000 per year to $15,000 per year for Fiscal Year (FY) 26-27; and 4.Authorize City Manager to execute proposed amendment, approve minor non-substantive modifications if necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk attesting to the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney.Page 863 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 4 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PW-012 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ON-CALL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES WITH MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC. CEQA: Determine that this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) (administrative activities) (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Determine that the First Amendment to the Maintenance Services with Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(5) (administrative activities); 2. Approve the proposed First Amendment to the agreement with Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. for On-call Landscape Maintenance Services, extending the contract term through June 30, 2027, increasing the total base contract amount by $623,663, and the total contract amount from $2,173,789 to $2,797,452 (Attachment 1); 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to increase the annual project conti ngency from $65,000 to $100,000 per year for Fiscal Year (FY) 26-27; and 4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendment, approve minor non-substantive modifications if necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk attesting to the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney. Executive Summary: At its May 24, 2022, meeting, City Council awarded a four-year maintenance services agreement to Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. (Merchants) to provide On-Call Landscape Maintenance Services, with an option to extend for one additional year (Attachment 2). The term for this agreement is currently set to expire on June 30, 2026. Staff requests approval of the proposed amendment to exercise the one-year extension option of the agreement to June 30, 2027, and increase the not-to-exceed contract amount by $623,663, therefore increasing the total contract amount from $2,173,789 to $2,797,452. Exercising the one-year extension maintains service continuity, while the City evaluates long-term landscape and tree maintenance needs. Staff also requests an increase in the annual project contingency from $65,000 to $100,000 to better address Page 864 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 4 unforeseen maintenance needs, tree removals, and other as-needed beautification efforts. Background: The City relies on a third-party contractor for landscape and tree maintenance services. The scope of work includes, but is not limited to, the landscape maintenance of City parks, facilities, medians, and parkways and the trimming and care of more than 1,800 City- owned trees. On April 21, 2022, the City conducted a competitive solicitation process for these services and identified Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. (Merchants) as the most qualified vendor. City Council awarded Merchants a contract at its May 24, 2022 meeting for a four- year period, starting on June 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2026, with an option to extend the contract term by one additional year. In July 2025 following multiple limb-failure incidents at Valley Park, staff initiated immediate safety inspections that resulted in the emergency removal of dead, diseased, and structurally compromised trees at Valley Park and along the Greenbelt. A total of twenty-six (26) trees were removed to ensure public safety after detailed inspections by certified arborists. On December 9, 2025, Council approved an increase in the annual contract contingency by $15,000 from $50,000 to $65,000 to accommodate the additional cost associated with the unanticipated tree removals, arborist services, and tree replanting, while preserving adequate contingency for other as-needed work. Staff continues proactive inspections, in coordination with Merchants, of high-use park areas, and additional removals, and replanting, may be necessary in the future to mitigate similar public safety risks. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description May 24, 2022 City Council awarded the landscape services contract to Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. December 9, 2025 City Council increased the annual project contingency for the Landscape Maintenance Services contract with Merchants by $15,000 from $50,000 to $65,000. Discussion: The current agreement will expire on June 30, 2026, and the contract is approaching its authorized spending limit as the approved contract amount only covered the period from FY 22-23 through FY 25-26. Continued services are necessary to provide ongoing landscape and tree maintenance city-wide. Staff solicited updated rates from Merchants for the new fiscal year and worked closely with Merchants to negotiate unit price increases for the year as there was concern about Page 865 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 4 increases in labor rates, cost of materials, and growing need for more arborist services and removals. Merchants is seeking an approximately $5,158 increase for the annual cost of woodchips due to the increase in cost for the material and an approximately $16,599 increase for the annual cost of tree services, for the City’s approximately 1,800 trees, primarily due to the increased need for arborist support services which is a required service as part of the contract. The City has experienced a number of tree removals in the past two years which has resulted in the increased need for these services to ensure tree maintenance oversight and public safety. All other line items in the contract are proposed to increase by 3%, which is below the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Staff is actively working to review, update, and separate the landscape and tree maintenance services scopes of work, including the ongoing completion of an inventory of the City’s trees, which has not been updated in many ye ars. The separation of these scopes of work are intended to drive competition, seek more specialized care, particularly for tree services, as the licensing requirements for each service are different. Staff anticipates releasing the RFPs in FY 26-27 for services beginning in either in FY 26-27, prior to the end of the proposed contract extension term, or in FY 27-28. Staff recommends Council approve the proposed contract amendment to ensure service continuity and allow staff adequate time to refine the scopes of work and issue new RFPs. Environmental Analysis: The proposed action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5), as it consists of administrative activities that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment. The amendment pertains to ongoing landscape maintenance services within the City. Fiscal Impact: The proposed first amendment extends the service contract one more year for FY 26 -27 at a cost of $623,663 for the base contract. In addition, staff is seeking Council approval of a $100,000 contingency to cover as-needed emergency services for a total of $723,663 for FY 26-27. Staff will budget the upcoming FY 26-27 extension year service cost as part of the upcoming FY 26-27 budget. Agreement Modification Request Agreement Current Authorized Amount Modified Request Amount FY 2026-27 Budget Dept. Account # Total Revised Contract Amount MSA 22-005 $2,173,789 $623,563 105-2601-4201 $2,797,352 Page 866 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 4 Attachments: 1. Proposed First Amendment with Merchants Landscape Services 2. May 2022 executed agreement with Merchants Landscape Services Respectfully Submitted by: Michael Dell’Amico, Management Analyst Concur: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 867 of 1126 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 FIRST AMENDMENT TO MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC. This First Amendment to the Maintenance Services Agreement for on-call landscape maintenance services (“First Amendment”) is made and entered into as of March 24, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Hermosa Beach (a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254) (“City”) and Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. (a California corporation with its principal place of business at 1510 S Lyon St., Santa Ana, California 92705) (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are hereinafter sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. RECITALS A. The Parties entered an agreement dated May 24, 2022 (“Agreement”), for Consultant to provide landscape maintenance services for the City’s landscape maintenance program (“Services”); and B. The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the compensation for the continued performance of the Services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties mutually agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals listed above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Amendment. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows: a. Time of Performance. Section 2 is revised by replacing the Page 868 of 1126 date “June 30, 2026” with the date “June 30, 2027”. b. Payment of Services. Section 3 is revised by amending the not to exceed compensation rates as set forth in Exhibit A -1 (Payment for Services for Fiscal Year 2026-2027), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this First Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect; and shall govern the actions of the Parties under this First Amendment. Whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the original Agreement from and after the date of this First Amendment, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this First Amendment. 4. Electronic Transmission. A manually signed copy of this First Amendment which is transmitted by facsimile, electronic mail, or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this First Amendment for all purposes. This First Amendment may be signed using an electronic signature. 5. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this First Amendment on the Effective Date. Page 869 of 1126 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVED BY: Steve Napolitano City Manager Attested By: Ann Yang Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jason Baltimore Interim City Attorney MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC. Patrick Healy Regional Manager Exhibit A-1: Payment of Services for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 EXHIBIT A-1: PAYMENT OF SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 Page 870 of 1126 5th Year July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKETTES Item No. Park Name and Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 1 Ardmore Park 491 Ardmore Avenue $294.52 $3,534.24 2 Bi-Centennial Park 550 4th Street $294.52 $3,534.24 3 Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue $883.54 $10,602.48 4 Fort Lots-of-Fun 1102 6th Street $515.31 $6,183.72 Page 871 of 1126 5 Greenwood Park 1102 Pacific Coast Highway $736.24 $8,834.88 6 Greenbelt/Trail Valley Drive $5,803.91 $69,647.64 7 Kay Etow Parkette Monterey Boulevard and Lyndon Street $368.15 $4,417.80 8 Lawn Bowling Green 861 Valley Drive $883.54 $10,602.48 9 Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street $220.90 $2,650.80 10 Noble Park 1400 The Strand $1,104.42 $13,253.04 11 Ocean View Parkette 857 3rd Street $220.90 $2,650.80 12 Sand Hill Parkette Palm Drive and Loma Walk $220.90 $2,650.80 13 Scout Park 1402 Prospect Avenue $220.90 $2,650.80 14 Sea View Parkette 1870 Prospect Avenue $294.52 $3,534.24 15 Shaffer Parkette 3231 Ingleside Drive $220.90 $2,350.80 16 South Park 425 Valley Park $2,208.85 $26,506.20 Page 872 of 1126 17 Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive $3,534.14 $42,409.68 18 Parkette 3rd Street and Prospect Avenue $220.89 $2,650.68 19 Parkette 4th Street and Prospect Avenue $220.89 $2,650.68 TOTAL: $18,468.00 $221,616.00 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF CITY FACILITIES Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 20 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive $736.39 $8,836.68 21 City Storage 1110 6th Street $294.52 $3,534.24 22 City Yard 555 6th Street $294.52 $3,534.24 23 Clark Building 861 Valley Drive $295.60 $3,547.20 24 Community Center 710 Pier Avenue $1,104.42 $13,253.04 26 Community Services Building 1035 Valley Drive $294.52 $3,534.24 27 Hermosa Beach Library 550 Pier Avenue $441.77 $5,301.24 28 Hermosa Beach Fire Station 540 Pier Avenue $294.52 $3,534.24 Page 873 of 1126 29 Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue $294.52 $3,534.24 TOTAL: $4,050.78 $48,609.36 PLACEMENT OF WOOD CHIPS Item No. Description Estimated Quantity per Year Unit Price Total Cost 30 Greenbelt 1,000 Cubic Yards $55.00 $55,000.00 31 South Park 40 Cubic Yards $55.00 $2,200.00 TOTAL: $110.00 $57,200.00 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF MEDIANS, PLANTERS, AND PARKWAYS Item no. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 32 MEDIANS – 35th Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $147.26 $1,767.12 33 MEDIANS – Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue $515.40 $6,184.80 34 MEDIANS – Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street to 35th Street $2,945.12 $35,341.44 35 MEDIANS – Herondo Street, from Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue $294.52 $3,534.24 36 MEDIANS – Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue $294.52 $3,534.24 37 MEDIANS – Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive $2,208.85 $26,506.20 38 PLANTERS – 2ND Street and the Strand $147.26 $1,767.12 39 PLANTERS – 8th Street and PCH $110.45 $1,325.40 Page 874 of 1126 40 PLANTERS – 10th Street and PCH $147.26 $1,767.12 41 PLANTERS – Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to the Strand $736.39 $8,836.68 42 PLANTERS – 14th Street and Ocean Drive $73.63 $883.56 43 PLANTERS – 14th Street and East of PCH $73.63 $883.56 44 PLANTERS – 15th Street and the Strand $147.26 $1,767.12 45 PLANTERS – 16th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to the Strand $147.26 $1,767.12 46 PLANTERS – 18th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to the Strand $147.26 $1,767.12 47 PLANTERS – 22nd Street and the Strand $147.26 $1,767.12 48 PLANTERS – 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue $147.26 $1,767.12 49 PLANTERS – 28th Street and Valley Drive $147.26 $1,767.12 50 PLANTERS – 29th Street and Valley Drive $147.26 $1,767.12 51 PLANTERS – Shakespeare, from 33rd Place to the Strand $220.89 $2,650.68 52 PLANTERS – Parking Structure – South side only $220.89 $2,650.68 53 PLANTERS – Parking Lot A $147.26 $1,767.12 54 PLANTERS – All Beach Restrooms Area Planters on 2nd Street, 14th Street, and 22nd Street $147.26 $1,767.12 55 PLANTERS – Parking Lot D (14th Street and Manhattan Avenue) $147.26 $1,767.12 Page 875 of 1126 56 PLANTERS – Pier Avenue, from Hermosa Avenue to Ardmore Avenue $2,208.85 $26,506.20 57 PLANTERS – 1201 The Strand (Schumacher Plaza) $220.89 $2,650.68 58 PARKWAY – Gould Avenue and Gould Terrace $515.40 $6,184.80 TOTALS: $12,553.81 $150,645.72 MAINTENANCE OF TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS, PICKELBALL COURTS, AND SKATE PARK Item No. Description Cost Per Field Monthly Cost Annual Cost 59 Tennis Courts (7 Total) $58.90 $412.30 $4,947.60 60 Pickleball Courts (4 total) $58.90 $235.60 $2,827.20 61 Basketball Courts (3 total) $58.90 $176.70 $2,120.40 62 Skate Park $350.56 $4,206.72 TOTAL: $1,175.16 $14,101.92 BALL FIELD MAINTENANCE AT CLARK FIELD Item No. Description Cost Per Field Total Monthly Cost Annual Cost 63 1 Soccer Field $1,472.56 $1,472.56 $17,670.72 64 3 Baseball Fields $736.29 $2,208.87 $26,506.44 TOTAL: $3,681.43 $44,177.16 TREE MAINTENANCE Page 876 of 1126 Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 65 Trimming of Tress Over 25 Feet - Every Two Years $1,380.00 $16,560.00 66 Trimming of Eucalyptus Trees Over 25 Feet – Annual $1,699.00 $20,388.00 67 Trimming of Trees Under 25 Feet – Once a Year and as Needed $1,855.00 $22,269.00 68 Maintenance of City Parkway Trees $715.00 $8,580.00 69 Maintenance of Park Trees $1,252.00 $15,024.00 TOTAL: $6,901.00 $82,821.00 TREE REMOVAL Item No. Description Cost Per Tree 70 Removal of Trees Less Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $1,200.00 71 Removal of Trees More Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $3,300.00 TOTAL: $4,500.00 TOTAL AMOUNT BASE PROPOSAL IN FIGURES: $623,671.16 TOTAL AMOUNT BASE PROPOSAL IN WORDS: Six Hundred Twenty-Three Thousand Six Hundred Seventy-One Dollars and Sixteen Cents. In the event of a conflict between the numbers given in figures and in words, the words shall control. Page 877 of 1126 Page 878 of 1126 Page 1 of 13 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES This Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services (“Agreement”) is made on this 24 day of May 2022, at Hermosa Beach, California, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corporation, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (hereinafter referred to as the “CITY”) and Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the “CONTRACTOR”). RECITALS A.CITY proposes to contract for Landscape Maintenance S ervices as set forth below in this Agreement; B.CONTRACTOR is willing to perform such services and has the necessary qualifications by reason of experience, preparation, and organization to provide the services described in Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY and the CONTRACTOR mutually agree as follows: 1.SERVICES. CONTRACTOR shall perform those services set forth in “Exhibit A” (Request for Proposal Document - Landscape Maintenance Services) which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. By executing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR represents that it has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. 2.TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of CONTRACTOR are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from CITY and shall be completed within the time period designated by CITY. The term of this Agreement shall be for the time period beginning July 1, 2022 and ending on June 30, 2026, unless extended in writing in advance by the CITY. 3.PAYMENT FOR SERVICES. CONTRACTOR shall be compensated in an amount not to exceed those amounts as listed on pages P-13X through 3 2-X of Attachment 1. Compensation shall under no circumstances be increased except by written amendment of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be paid within thirty (30) days of presentation of an DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 879 of 1126 Page 2 of 13 invoice to CITY for services performed to CITY’s satisfaction. CONTRACTOR shall submit invoices monthly describing the services performed, the date services were performed, a description of reimbursable costs, and any other information requested by CITY. 4.CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. 4.1. CITY’s Representative. Unless otherwise designated in writing John Cordova, Public Works Superintendent shall serve as the CITY’s representative for the administration of the project. All activities performed by the CONTRACTOR shall be coordinated with this person. 4.2. Manager-i n-Charge. For the CONTRACTOR Patrick Healy shall be in charge of the project on all matters relating to this Agreement and any agreement or approval made by her/him shall be binding on the CONTRACTOR. The Manager -in-Charge shall not be replaced without the written consent of the CITY. 4.3. Responsibilities of the CITY. The CITY shall provide all relevant documentation in its possession to the CONTRACTOR upon request in order to minimize duplication of efforts. The CITY’s staff shall work with the CONTRACTOR as necessary to facilitate performance of the services. 4.4. Pers onnel. The CONTRACTOR represents that it has or will secure at its own expense all personnel required to perform the services under this Agreement. All of the services required under this Agreement will be performed by the CONTRACTOR or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be qualified to perform such services. The CONTRACTOR reserves the right to determine the assignment of its own employees to the performance of the CONTRACTOR’s services under this Agreement, but the CITY reserves the right, for good cause, to require the CONTRACTOR to exclude any employee from performing services on the CITY’s premises. 5.TERMINATION. 5.1. Termination for Convenience. Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause and in its sole discretion at any time by giving the other party thirty (30) days' written notice of such termination. In the event of such termination, the CONTRACTOR shall cease services as of the date of termination and shall be DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 880 of 1126 Page 3 of 13 compensated for services performed to the CITY's satisfaction up to the date of termination. 5.2. Termination for Cause. All terms, provisions, and specifications of this Agreement are material and binding, and failure to perform any material portion of the work described herein shall be considered a breach of this Agreement. Should the Agreement be breached in any manner, the CITY may, at its option, terminate the Agreement not less than five (5) days after written notification is received by the CONTRACTOR to remedy the violation within the stated time or within any other time period agreed to by the parties. In the event of such termination, the CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any additional costs incurred by the CITY in securing the services from another contractor. 6.INDEMNIFICATION. 6.1. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by CITY, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, and cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with CONTRACTOR's performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT, regardless of CITY’S passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage which is caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY. Should CITY in its sole discretion find CONTRACTOR’S legal counsel unacceptable, then CONTRACTOR shall reimburse the CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. The CONTRACTOR shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement. 6.2. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONTRACTOR as required by Section 17, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 881 of 1126 Page 4 of 13 assumed by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification. 7.INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. 7.1. The CONTRACTOR, at the CONTRACTOR’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies: 7.1.1. Workers’ Compensation Coverage. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for its employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, the CONTRACTOR shall require any and every subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor’s employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by the CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the CONTRACTOR for City. 7.1.2. General Liability Coverage. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. 7.1.3. Automobile Liability Coverage. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the CONTRACTOR arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than three hundred thousand DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 882 of 1126 Page 5 of 13 dollars ($300,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. 7.2. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be issued by insurers possessing a Best’s rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the specific language of Section 8.2.1 below. 7.2.1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.” 7.2.2. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the CITY, including any self - insured retention the CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy. 7.2.3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. 7.2.4. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents. 7.2.5. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. 7.2.6. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ written notice has been received by the CITY. 7.3. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self - insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 883 of 1126 Page 6 of 13 CITY. At the CITY’s option, the CONTRACTOR shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self- insured retentions. 7.4. Certificates of Insurance. The CONTRACTOR shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to the CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement. 7.5. Failure to Procure Insurance. Failure on the part of the CONTRACTOR to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which the CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 6.2 above. 7.6. Nonpayment of Deductible. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required by this Agreement shall allow City, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the CONTRACTOR (as the named insured) should CONTRACTOR fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. CONTRACTOR understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by CONTRACTOR as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should City pay the SIR or deductible on CONTRACTOR’S behalf upon the CONTRACTOR’S failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, City may include such amounts as damages in any action against CONTRACTOR for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by City due to the breach. 8.ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to the CITY for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience, and competence of the CONTRACTOR. Assignments of any or all rights, duties, or obligations of the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall not subcontract DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 884 of 1126 Page 7 of 13 any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of the CITY. If the CITY consents to such subcontract, the CONTRACTOR shall be fully responsible to the CITY for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the CITY and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the CITY to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. 9.COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, CODES, ORDINANCES, AND REGULATIONS. The CONTRACTOR shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations. 9.1. Taxes . The CONTRACTOR agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against the CITY by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. In the event that the CITY is audited by any Federal or State agency regarding the independent contractor status of the CONTRACTOR and the audit in any way fails to sustain the validity of a wholly independent contractor relationship between the CITY and the CONTRACTOR, then the CONTRACTOR agrees to reimburse the CITY for all costs, including accounting and attorneys’ fees, arising out of such audit and any appeals relating thereto. 9.2. Workers’ Compensation Law. The CONTRACTOR shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding the CONTRACTOR and the CONTRACTOR’s employees. The CONTRACTOR further agrees to indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from any failure of the CONTRACTOR to comply with applicable workers’ compensation laws. The CITY shall have the right to offset against the amount of any compensation due to the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement any amount due to the CITY from the CONTRACTOR as a result of the CONTRACTOR’s failure to promptly pay to the CITY any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section. 9.3. Licenses. The CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to the CITY that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of the DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 885 of 1126 Page 8 of 13 CONTRACTOR to practice its profession. The CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to the CITY that the CONTRACTOR shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, insurance, and approvals which are legally required of the CONTRACTOR to practice its profession. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain a City of Hermosa Beach business license, if required under CITY ordinance. 9.4. Prevailing Wages. CONTRACTOR shall abide by the minimum prevailing rate of wages as determined by the State of California, Department of Industrial Relations for each craft, classification, or type of worker employed to carry out provisions of the Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall keep on file sufficient evidence of its employee compensation to enable verification of compliance of Prevailing Wages as established by State of California, Department of Industrial Relations. 10.CONFLICT OF INTEREST. The CONTRACTOR confirms that it has no financial, contractual, or other interest or obligation that conflicts with or is harmful to performance of its obligations under this Agreement. The CONTRACTOR shall not during the term of this Agreement knowingly obtain such an interest or incur such an obligation, nor shall it employ or subcontract with any person for performance of this Agreement who has such incompatible interest or obligation. 11.NON-DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. The CONTRACTOR represents and agrees that it does not and will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, medical condition, sex, sexual orientation and/or gender identity, national origin, political affiliation or opinion, or pregnancy or pregnancy-related condition. 12.R ECORDS AND AUDITS. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property, and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Agreement and such other records as may be deemed necessary by the CITY or any authorized representative, and will be retained for three years after the expiration of this Agreement. All such records shall be made available for inspection or audit by the CITY at any time during regular business hours. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 886 of 1126 Page 9 of 13 13.O WNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. It is understood and agreed that the CITY shall own all documents and other work product of the CONTRACTOR, except the CONTRACTOR’s notes and workpapers, which pertain to the work performed under this Agreement. The CITY shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion and without further compensation to the CONTRACTOR, but any re-use of such documents by the CITY on any other project without prior written consent of the CONTRACTOR shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall at its sole expense provide all such documents to the CITY upon request. 14.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR is and shall at all times remain as to the CITY a wholly independent CONTRACTOR. Neither the CITY nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of the CONTRACTOR or any of the CONTRACTOR’s employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The CONTRACTOR shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of the CITY or otherwise act on behalf of the CITY as an agent. 15.NOTICE. All Notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed made when delivered to the applicable party’s representative as provided in this Agreement. Additionally, such notices may be given to the respective parties at the following addresses, or at such other addresses as the parties may provide in writing for this purpose. Such notices shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. mail, first- class postage prepaid, and addressed to the party at its applicable address. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 887 of 1126 Page 10 of 13 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attention: Joe SanClemente, Director Public Works Department CONTRACTOR: MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC. 1510 South Lyon Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 Attention: Patrick Healy, Regional Manager 16.GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. 17.ENTIRE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or written, between the parties, and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, oral or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein. Any agreement, statement, or promise not contained in the Agreement, and any modification to the Agreement, will be effective only if signed by both parties. 18.ATTORNEYS’ FEES. In any action brought to declare the rights granted herein or to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees in an amount determined by the court. 19.WAIVER. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this agreement. Payment of any invoice by the CITY shall not constitute a waiver of the CITY’s right to obtain correction or replacement of any defective or noncompliant work product. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 888 of 1126 Page 11 of 13 20.EXECUTION. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 21.AUTHORITY TO ENTER AGREEMENT. The CONTRACTOR has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform this Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the 24 day of May 2022. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: CONTRACTOR: Michael Detoy, City Mayor Company Name ATTEST: Myra Maravilla, City Clerk Patrick Healy, Regional Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________________ Michael Jenkins, City Attorney Contractor’s State License No. Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 889 of 1126 Page 12 of 13 NONCOLLUSION AFFIDAVIT TO BE EXECUTED BY EACH AWARDEE OF A PRINCIPAL CONTRACT STA TE OF CALIFORNIA ) )ss COUNTY OF ) being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he is (sole owner, a partner, president, etc.) of _________________________________________________________________, the party making the foregoing bid, that such bid is not made in the interest of or behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation, that such bid is genuine and not collusive or sham, that said bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding, that said bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreements, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of said bidder or of any other bidder, or to fix the overhead, profit or cost element of such bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contractor or anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in such bid are true and, further, that said bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his bid price, or any breakdown thereof, of the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid and will not pay any fee in connection therewith to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agency thereof, or to any other individual, except to such person or persons who have a partnership of other financial interest with said bidder in his general business. Signed ___ Title Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 2022. Notary Public DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 890 of 1126 Page 13 of 13 COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATE Pursuant to Section 1861 of the State Labor Code, each Contractor to whom a public works contract has been awarded shall sign the following certificate and shall submit same to the City of Her mosa Beach prior to performing any work on this contract: I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract. CONTRACTOR: _______________________. __(TITLE)_______________________ Date DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 891 of 1126 1A EXHIBIT A Section 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. Summary of Work Covered by Contract Documents A. The Work covered under this contract includes landscape maintenance services for the City of Hermosa Beach. B. The Contractor is required to furnish all labor, materials, services, tools, equipment, transportation, hauling, dumping, fertilizers, seeds, plants, insurance, bonds, security, notifications, licenses, permits, fees in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulatory requirements, and any other items needed to complete the specified work in strict accordance with the Contract Documents. Any miscellaneous labor, equipment, and/or materials not specifically detailed or specified but required to complete the work shall be provided by the Contractor as an integral part of the work, at no increase in cost to the Owner. C. Scope of Work Contractor shall perform all work necessary to complete the agreement in a manner satisfactory to the Public Works Director or his/her designee. The work to be done under these specifications shall include the furnishing of all labor, material, equipment, tools, disposal site or disposal transfer station expense and any other incidental expense necessary to perform the followin g services for the City of Hermosa Beach. The areas to be maintained shall include turf areas, ground cover areas, trees and shrubs in parks, medians and the downtown area. Including landscaped areas surrounding City owned facilities (City Hall, City Storage Building, City Yard, Clark Building, Community Center, Community Services Building, Hermosa Beach Library, Hermosa Beach Fire Station, and Hermosa Beach Police Department. D. Level of Maintenance 1. All work shall be performed in accordance with the maintenance standards at frequencies established by City representative, so as to maintain a pleasing aesthetic level. Standards and frequencies may be modified from time to time as deemed necessary by the City for the proper maintenance of these parks and medians. 2. The following must be done weekly at all parks: mow turf, edging, shrubs, hardscape maintenance, and visual inspections. Litter must be picked up daily. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 892 of 1126 2A 3. The City shall make weekly inspections of all areas included in the agreement. The results of each inspection shall be recorded and retained for reference. The City shall allot ten (10) hours. Contractor shall compensate the City for all time required for inspection and supervision in excess of the above-specified time, providing that: 1) The excess time is, in the opinion of the City, required due to an inadequate level of maintenance as specified herein; 2) That the Contractor has failed to correct said deficiencies within 3 working days after notification. Compensation shall be charged at a rate including actual time, mileage and fringe benefit costs incurred by the City. Notices and penalties for non -performance are set forth as follows: 1) Deficiency Notice: Contractor is required to correct deficiencies within the time specified by the City. 2) Withholding of Payment: Provided work under the deficiency notice has not been completed within the time allotted, payment for subject deficiency shall be withheld until deficiency is corrected, without right to retroactive payments. E. Extra Work Extra work is that work not included under the various proposal items nor the result of the Contractor’s negligence. Extra work shall include but not be limited to new planting of shrubs and trees, replanting of ground cover, backfilling washed out areas, pulling weeds from residential sidewalks, etc. The City will pay for all extra work at a price approved by the City prior to completion of the work. Any additional laborers will be paid at a rate equal to the wage rate an d mark up per the Contractor’s hourly rates. Contractor shall be responsible for any losses or damage due to negligence as determined by the City representative. Contractor shall obtain written approval from the City representative prior to proceeding with any extra work except for emergency repairs. Contractor shall submit a written proposal to the City when extra work is required or requested by the City, this proposal shall indicate labor cost(s) that are equal to the contract wage rate including mark up and market rate material costs including mark up, if any. The City reserves the right to have any extra work completed by other Contractors or City forces. All work performed under this section shall not interfere with or reduce normal maintenance schedules or activities. Separate crews shall be utilized for extra work unless otherwise agreed upon by the City’s representative. F. Working Hours DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 893 of 1126 3A Monday through Sunday 8AM to 5PM G. Park or Building Closures In the event any area of a park is unusable for any reason, including acts of nature or vandalism, the City may declare, for the purpose of maintenance, the park is closed. Notwithstanding, any provisions contained elsewhere in this agreement, the City reserves the right to perform any repair or construction work it deems advisable, including normal routine maintenance contemplated by this agreement, with its own labor and equipment or through a third party. Contractor shall provide credit for days not worked at a location due to park closures or City projects. In The event, any City building is closed for construction where the landscaping is not accessible or being replaced as a city project. There shall be no billing for that facility until the building / landscaping is completed and opened to the public. H. Damages Contractor shall report immediately any damage to City equipment or property. Contractor shall be liable for damages caused by his/her vehicular traffic. Any repairs and associated cost resulting from Contractor vehicle damage shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. I. Materials and Equipment to be Provided by Contractor Contractor at his own cost and expense shall furnish all necessary equipment, supplies, and materials of good quality and in the amounts necessary to fulfill this agreement and to accomplish an acceptable and professional level of maintenance. These equipment, supplies, and materials shall include, but not be limited to: 1. All necessary gas, oil, and spare parts for all equipment. 2. All necessary top dressing, seed, fertilizers, amendments, tree stakes, fasteners, and City approved pest control. 3. Contractor shall replace all trees, shrubs, and ground cover if dead or damaged due to Contractor negligence. Contractor shall secure the City’s approval of the type of each supply, material or equipment prior to its use or installation on park facilities. The City will provide water at each park site at no cost to the Contractor. J. Equipment Noise DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 894 of 1126 4A Each internal combustion engine used for any purpose on the project or related to the project shall be equipped with a muffler of a type recommended by the manufacturer. No internal combustion engine shall be operated on the agreement without said muffler. (It is preferred that electric equipment be used when possible.) Said noise level requirement shall apply to all equipment on the project or related to the project including but not limited to trucks, or transient equipment that may or may not be owned by the Contractor. The use of loud sound signals shall be avoided in favor of light warnings except those required by safety laws for the protection of the public or Contractor's personnel. K. Blowers Use of leaf blowers within the City was prohibited as of July 1, 1988, and the operation of any mechanical device to blow leaves, dirt or other debris is prohibited by Municipal Code Chapter 8.24.0 40. L. Inclement Weather Contractor shall not perform any operations during inclement weather, which may destroy or damage ground cover or turf areas. Contractor shall contact the City for the determination of non-operation conditions. During inclement weather, Contractor shall provide staffing for citywide park inspections, debris removal and cleanup in addition to work described in the contractor documents. Contractor shall perform such duties as replacing tree stakes, re-tie trees, and remove debris from catch basins in parks and some street areas as instructed by City Representative. M. Air Pollution Contractor shall comply with all air pollution control rules, regulations, ordinances and statutes, which apply to any work, performed pursuant to the agreement and shall not discharge smoke, dust or any other air contaminants into the atmosphere in such quantity as will violate the regulations of any legally constituted authority. Material to be disposed of shall not be burned. N. Special Provision Traffic and Detours 1. General Contractor shall provide all labor, materials and equipment to install barriers, guards, lights, signs, temporary bridges, flag-persons; advising the public of detours and construction/maintenance hazards, and, DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 895 of 1126 5A upon completion of the work, promptly remove all signs and warning devices. Contractor shall be responsible for compliance with additional public safety requirements, which may arise during landscape installations at the park site. Contractor shall notify the City twenty-four (24) hours in advance of closing, partial closing or reopening of any street or public thoroughfare. Contractor shall provide a traffic control plan from the WHATCH Manual to be approved by City representative before the work begins. The traffic control devices should be in place when work is occurring. 2. Responsibility Should Contractor appear to be neglectful or negligent in furnishing warning and protective measures, the City may direct attention to the existence of a hazard, and the necessary warning and protective measures shall be furnished and installed by the Contractor, at the Contractor's expense. 3. Hauling Spillage resulting from operations on or across public thoroughfares shall be immediately removed as specified in the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 8.44.060 at Contractor's expense. When entering or leaving roadways carrying public traffic, the Contractor's equip ment, whether empty or loaded, shall in all cases yield to public traffic. O. Disposal of Debris Contractor, as specified in the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 8.44.060, shall promptly dispose of all debris accumulated as a result of maintenance operations and shall not allow any debris therefore to remain on the public street or other public property after 5:00 P.M. on the day which they are collected. Debris is defined as grass clippings, leaves, branches, paper and all foreign matter, etc. All debris shall be disposed of at the City Yard. Disposal of debris shall be performed at no additional cost to the City and shall be considered to be included as part of the Contractor’s proposal price. P. Maintenance Schedules Contractor is required to furnish weekly, monthly, and annual maintenance schedules to include planned activities for all persons performing any function of the agreement. The schedules shall be submitted to the City no later than the start of the agreement and shall be updated as necessary. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 896 of 1126 6A Q. Herbicides/Pesticides The use of any and all herbicides and pesticides are prohibited in the City of Hermosa Beach, thus the routine maintenance of weed control must be maintained by hand operation or other methods other than herbicides; other methods (mechanical, mulching, etc.) that are required to maintain a positive aesthetic area can also be used. R. Arborist Services Contractor shall provide Arborist services when requested. This includes all trees covered in this contract. Any dead or diseased trees that require removal will be inspected by the Arborist and Contractors reprehensive prior to removal, a written report or memo will be required City may require Arborist service in determining the condition and potential hazards of city trees. S. Submittals The following submittals are required prior to commencement of work. 1. Traffic Control Plan 2. List of equipment to be used 3. Emergency contacts 4. Letters Identifying Site Authorized Contractor’s Representative or “Superintendent” and Contractor’s “Competent Person” 5. Copy of City business license 6. And others as requested by the Public Works Superintendent DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 897 of 1126 7B 2.Descriptions of Items in the Proposal Schedule The following descriptions of Proposal Items are intended to clarify and expand on the description of Proposal Items in the Proposal Schedule. All items of work described shall be included in the amount proposal for that item. The following tables provide the items of work to be completed at each location. For specifications about the work, see Section 2.1- Description of Work in Special Provisions. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKETTES Item No.Park Name and Address Description of Work 1 Ardmore Park 491 Ardmore Avenue •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 2 Bi-Centennial Park 550 4th Street •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 3 Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture •Planters •Basketball Court •Decomposed Granite Care •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 4 Fort Lots-of-Fun 1102 6th Street •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture •Planters •Trash Cans (Only from June to September) •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 5 Greenwood Park 1102 Pacific Coast Highway •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 6 Greenbelt •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains •Planters •Exercise Equipment •Fire Pit •Entrance Ways to Wood Chip Path •Litter Control DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 898 of 1126 8B 7 Kay Etow Parkette Monterey Boulevard and Lyndon Street •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture •Planters •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 8 Clark Field 861 Valley Drive •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains •One (1) Tennis Court •Planters •Sidewalks •Litter Control •Two (2) Basketball Courts •Four (4) Pickleball Courts •Lawn Bowling Green • 9 Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture •Planters •Sidewalks •One (1) Basketball Court •Trees •Litter Control 10 Noble Park 1400 The Strand •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •Litter Control •Trees •Trash Cans - (Only From June to September) •Sidewalks •Decomposed Granite Path •Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains 11 Ocean View Parkette 857 3rd Street •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 12 Sand Hill Parkette Manhattan Avenue and Loma Drive •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •Stairs •Sidewalks •Tree •Litter Control 13 Scout Parkette 1402 Prospect Avenue •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 14 Sea View Parkette 1870 Prospect Avenue •Turf Care •Playground Equipment •Park Furniture •Planters •Irrigation •Trash Cans (Between June and September) •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control •BBQ 15 Shaffer Parkette •Turf Care •Sidewalks DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 899 of 1126 9B 3231 Ingleside Drive •Park Furniture •Planters •BBQ •Trees •Litter Control 16 South Park 425 Valley Park •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains •Sidewalks •Trees •Planters •BBQ •Playground •Decomposed Granite Pathway •Litter Control •Trash Cans (June to September) 17 Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •BBQ •Litter Control •Trees •Playground •Fire Pit •Trash Cans (June To September) •Sidewalks •Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains •One (1) Basketball Court 18 PARKETTE 3rd Street and Prospect Avenue •Tree •Turf •Irrigation 19 PARKETTE 4th Street and Prospect Avenue •Trees •Turf •Irrigation •Shrubs •Shrubs LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF CITY FACILITIES Item No. Facility Name and Address Description of Work 20 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive •Irrigation •Sidewalks •Litter Control •Planters • Trees • Entrances • Trash Cans Note: City Hall includes the front of the building and Bard Street behind the building. To examine the area behind City Hall, Proposer should contact Public Works. 21 City Storage 1110 6th Street •Litter Control •Sidewalks •Entrances • Irrigation • Planters • Trees 22 City Yard 555 6th Street •Litter Control • Sidewalks • Trees DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 900 of 1126 10B 23 Clark Building 861 Valley Drive •Turf Care •Litter Control •Sidewalks •Planters • Trees • Entrances • Irrigation 24 Community Center 710 Pier Avenue •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •Entrances • Litter Control • Sidewalks 25 Community Services Building 1035 Valley Drive •Turf Care •Litter Control • Sidewalks • Trees • Picnic Tables 26 Hermosa Beach Library 550 Pier Avenue •Litter Control •Sidewalks •Planters • Entrances 27 Hermosa Beach Fire Station 540 Pier Avenue •Litter Control •Sidewalks •Planters • Trees • Benches • Entrances 28 Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue •Litter Control •Sidewalks •Planters • Trees • Stairs • Benches LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES Item No. Location Description of Work 29 MEDIANS – 35th Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand •Plants •Irrigation •Litter Control 30 MEDIANS – Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue •Palms •Irrigation •Litter Control 31 MEDIANS – Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street to 35th Street •Plants •Trees •Irrigation •Litter Control 32 MEDIANS – Herondo Street, from Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue •Palms •Irrigation •Litter Control 33 MEDIANS – Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue •Weed Removal DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 901 of 1126 11B 34 MEDIANS – Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Ardmore Avenue •Planters have tree grates requiring litter removal. Planters are located on the sidewalks on the north and south sides of Pier Avenue. 35 PLANTERS – 2ND Street and the Strand •Plants •Palms •Irrigation •Litter Control 36 PLANTERS – 8th Street and Pacific Coast Highway •Plants •Litter Control 37 PLANTERS – 10th Street and Pacific Coast Highway •Plant •Irrigation •Litter Control 38 PLANTERS – Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand •Palm Trees •Irrigation •Litter Control •Planters have tree grates requiring litter removal. 39 PLANTERS – 14th Street and Ocean Drive •Plants •Litter Control 40 PLANTERS – 14th Street and East of Pacific Coast Highway •Palms •Irrigation •Litter Control 41 PLANTERS – 15TH Street and The Strand •Plants •Irrigation •Litter Control 42 PLANTERS – 16th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand •Plants •Irrigation •Litter Control 43 PLANTERS – 18th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand •Plants •Trees •Irrigation •Litter Control 44 PLANTERS – 22nd Street and The Strand •Plants •Palms •Irrigation •Litter Control 45 PLANTERS – 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue •Plants •Trees •Irrigation •Litter Control 46 PLANTERS – 28th Street and Valley Drive •Plants •Litter Control 47 PLANTERS – 29TH Street and Valley Drive •Plants •Litter Control DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 902 of 1126 11B-2 48 PLANTERS – Shakespeare, from 33rd Place to The Strand •Plants •Litter Control 49 PLANTERS – Parking Structure – south side only •Plants •Irrigation •Litter Control 50 PLANTERS – Parking Lot A •Plants •Irrigation •Litter Control 51 PLANTERS – All Beach Restrooms Area Planters on 2nd Street, 14th Street, and 22nd Street •Palms •Irrigation •Litter Control 52 PLANTERS – Parking Lot D (14th Street and Manhattan Avenue) •Irrigation •Trees •Plants •Litter Control 53 PLANTERS – Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Ardmore Avenue •Planters have tree grates requiring litter removal. •Litter Control 54 PLANTERS – 1201 The Strand (Schumacher Plaza) •Plants and Irrigation above the bench. •Palm Trees and Irrigation on the south side. •Litter Control 55 PARKWAY – Gould Avenue and Gould Terrace •Irrigation •Trees •Ground cover •Litter Control r Note: Maintenance applies to the flat area only, which is owned by the City of Hermosa Beach. BALL FIELD MAINTENANCE AT CLARK FIELD Item No. Field Type Description of Work 56 1 Soccer Field •To be maintained daily during soccer season (September through December). •To be maintained on an as-needed basis, as determined by the City. •Litter Control. 57 3 Baseball Fields •To be maintained daily during the regular season (February 1st through July 31st). DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 903 of 1126 11B-3 •To be maintained on an as-needed basis, as determined by the City, normally 2-3 times a week. •Litter Control. MAINTENANCE OF TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS, PICKLEBALL COURTS, AND SKATE PARK Item No. Item Type Location Description 58 Tennis Courts Clark Field 861 Valley Drive •To be washed down once a month. Community Center 710 Pier Avenue •To be washed down once a month. •Plant growth should be edged so no plant material (ivy) is on the court surfaces. 59 Pickleball Courts Clark Field 861 Valley Drive •To be washed down once a month. 60 Basketball Courts Clark Field 861 Valley Drive •To be washed down once a month. Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue •To be washed down once a month. Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street •To be swept. As part of this RFP, Proposer is encouraged to recommend a schedule of maintenance for sweeping the basketball court. Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive •To be swept. As part of this RFP, Proposer is encouraged to recommend a schedule of maintenance for sweeping the basketball court. 61 Skate Park Community Center 710 Pier Avenue •To be washed down once a month. •Litter removal. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 904 of 1126 11B-4 PLACEMENT OF WOOD CHIPS Item No. Location Description 62 Greenbelt Wood chips are to be replaced twice a year and as needed. 63 South Park Wood chips in the play area are to be replaced twice a year. TREE MAINTENANCE Item No. Description Specification 64 Trimming of Trees Over 25 Feet Every Two Years 65 Trimming of Eucalyptus Trees Over 25 Feet Annually 66 Trimming of Trees Under 25 Feet Once a Year and as Needed 67 Maintenance of City Parkway Trees See details in Section 2 Description of Work Items – No. 21 – Tree Maintenance. 68 Maintenance of Park Trees See details in Section 2 Description of Work Items – No. 21 – Tree Maintenance. TREE REMOVAL Item No. Description Specification 69 Removal of Trees Less Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) See details in Section 2 Description of Work Items – No. 21 – C. Tree Removal. 70 Removal of Trees More Than 25’ (twenty- five feet) See details in Section 2 Description of Work Items – No. 21 – C. Tree Removal. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 905 of 1126 24B Item 30: Medians on Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue. This area consists of tree wells and raised asphalt medians requiring litter removal, weeding, and sweeping. Item 33: Medians on Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue. This is a raised asphalt median requiring litter removal, sweeping, and weeding. Item 34: Medians on Pier Avenue, from Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive. This area has tree grates will require litter removal. Item 35: Planters on 2nd Street and The Strand require weeding, cultivating, litter removal, and replanting. How often replanting, how many plans Item 38: Planters on Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand, have tree grates that will require litter removal. 18.Ball Field Maintenance Clark Field a.Baseball/Softball Field Maintenance Recognizing that the baseball/softball diamonds are high-use facilities and that the proper care and maintenance of these is critical to the safety and well-being of the user-public as well as a deterrent to liability litigation, it is necessary to establish standards to insure adequate playing conditions. The baseball/softball fields are to be maintained on a daily basis, Monday through Sunday during baseball season from February to July. During the off season, the baseball/softball diamonds shall be maintained on an as-needed basis as determined by the City, normally 2-3 times a week, and coordinated with the slow pitch schedule. This work shall be completed before 12:00 PM. each scheduled day. Baseball/softball field maintenance includes watering, dragging, filling in sunken areas, and raking all sand areas for debris. For a complete set of specifications on the care and maintenance of baseball/softball diamonds see the special section titled "Care and Maintenance of Baseball and Softball Diamonds." Special mowing is required at the southeast filled as not to use heavy mowing equipment that could damage turf infield. The responsibility for the condition and maintenance of baseball/softball diamonds shall be as follows: A.Contractor’s employee shall be responsible for the areas in which the diamonds are located and shall be charged with the overall responsibility for the condition and maintenance of the diamonds. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 906 of 1126 12A 3. Office For Inquires and Complaints The Contractor shall maintain an office at some fixed place and shall maintain a telephone therein, listed in the telephone directory in his/her own name or in the file name by which he/she is commonly known, and shall at all times during the hours between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM of each working day have a full-time employee at said office for the answering of inquiries and for receiving complaints from the Director of Public Works. The Contractor shall maintain a written log of all complaints, the date thereof, and the action taken pursuant thereto or the reason for non -action. Such a log of complaints shall be open to the inspection of the Director of Public Works. The Contractor shall make every reasonable effort to respond to complaints on the same day they are received and shall report to the Director of Public Works within twenty-four (24) hours as to the action taken concerning each complaint. 4. Public Relations Contractor shall, in person or through his/her agent, investigate any complaint, which may concern, or be involved in, the performance of the contract. Contractor shall report to the Director of Public Works, or designee, the following working day as to the action taken with reference to the complaint and, when necessary, complete a Service Request, which will remain on file at City Hall. Complaints received before noon shall be answered the same day; complaints received after noon shall be answered the following day. 5. Emergency Call Back The Contractor shall provide employees and equipment to respond to any after hour emergency, sewer plug or spill. A 24-hour contact phone number shall be provided by the Contractor. Contractor must respond within 30 minutes after being contacted by the City. Contractor must mobilize and have the appropriate personnel and equipment in the City of Hermosa Beach within two (2) hours from when the emergency phone call was received per the base proposal or within one (1) hour from when the emergency phone call was received per the alterna tive proposal. The emergency may require as Vactor truck and video camera vehicle. This response requirement includes nights, weekends, holidays, and all hours. For proposal purposes, costs for this service shall include all mobilization and hourly costs using a two-man, two -hour minimum service. 6. Damages DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 907 of 1126 13A The Contractor shall report without delay any damage to City equipment, City property or private property. The Contractor shall be liable for damages caused by his/her actions. Any repairs and associated cost resulting from Contractor caused damage shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 908 of 1126 14A Sec tion 2 Description of Work Items General Maintenance The following details pertain to landscape maintenance of all City parks, parkettes, facilities, medians, planters, and parkways. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to visit each site to determine and verify all estimates. The City will not be responsible for any errors or omissions in the estimates. The Contractor shall ask the City for resolution of Questions in this section before submitting a proposal. 1. Turf a. Care All turf areas shall be maintained at a mowing height of one (1) inch to one and one- half (1½) inches. Turfs shall be mowed once a week. During heavy growth seasons or for special events, extra mowing may be required by the City, and performed by the Contractor at no additional cost to the City. Turf shall be swept, vacuumed, or otherwise cleaned to maintain a neat appearance at all times. Turf clippings and debris shall be lifted the same day of each mowing, trimming or edging operation and shall be removed from the site as specified in Municipal Code, Chapter 8.44.060. Contractor shall pay special attention so as to have the turf areas in their best appearance fat all times Turf shall be over-seeded twice annually in all parks and as needed in the heavily worn areas. See Section titled Over-Seeding. Bare areas shall be re-seeded with a topper; a nontoxic weed control shall be used to keep turf looking aesthetically pleasing after approval of City representative Contractor shall take special care not to cause any damage to the turf or Greenbelt area with vehicles or mowing equipment. Contractor shall complete repairs immediately after damage occurs. b. Edging and Trimming Turf shall be trimmed to the edge of sidewalks, curbs, mow strips, retaining walls, posts, valve boxes, controllers, light standards and any paved surface. Turf shall be kept trimmed to a sufficient distance from sprinkler heads to ensure proper sprinkler coverage and for a distance of eighteen (18) inches from all tree trunks. Contractor shall exercise care not to injure the tree trunks with mechanical equipment. Contractor shall also keep turf trimmed to a sufficient distance from all valve and quick coupler irrigation boxes. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 909 of 1126 15A 1. c. Quarterly Fertilization Treatment All turf areas sh all be fertilized to a minimum of four times a year or greater as is necessary to maintain a healthy appearance and condition. Fertilizer material tags shall be submitted to the City for approval before application. All plants, ground cover, shrubs, and trees shall be fertilized and treated as necessary to maintain a healthy condition and appearance. Fertilizers shall be mixed to a depth of 3” and replenished at a frequency to maintain an aesthetically pleasing appearance. This is for all plant and flower b eddings. d. Soil Aeration All turf areas shall be aerated a minimum of two (2) times each year. This minimum aeration will be scheduled for: February 1st to February 28th and August 1st to August 31st. These dates are subject to change at the City’s discretion. Aeration should be accomplished just prior to fertilizer application. The entire turf areas shall be aerated with a self-propelled machine that removes cores of soil 3/4" in diameter by four (4) to six (6) inches long, spaced no more than six (6) inches apart before aerating. e. Overseeding Contractor shall over-seed all turf areas twice annually. In addition Contractor shall over-seed the Christmas Tree Lot located at Community Center east turf area the first week of January, each year of the agreement. Contractor Shall over seed areas that need special care as requested by the Public Works representative. f. Thatch Removal Thatch shall be removed with a vertical mower, or its approved equal, once a year coordinated with soil aeration of all turf areas as directed by the City. Care shall be taken to avoid unnecessary or excessive injury to the turf grass stand. Cont ractor shall sweep or rake the dislodged thatch from the turf -areas and remove from the park site as specified in Municipal Code, Chapter 8.44.060. After the thatch is removed, turf shall be aerated, fertilized, and watered. This operation shall be coordinated with Section titled Fertilization. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 910 of 1126 16A 2. Shrubs, Bushes, and Planters Shrubs and bushes shall be selectively pruned to a distance of one (1) foot from fences, buildings, driveways, sidewalks, trees, retaining walls and sprinkler heads. Contractor sha ll prune where necessary to maintain safe vehicular and pedestrian visibility as directed by the City. Contractor shall provide sufficient landscape detail to maintain an aesthetic and trimmed appearance. a. Mulch Planters shall be mulched to a depth of 3” an d replenished at a frequency to maintain this depth and an aesthetically pleasing appearance. This includes the Hermosa Avenue medians from 10th Street to 14th Street, Hermosa Avenue center medians from 27th Street to 35th Street, Pier Avenue Planters, City Hall planters, and Community Center planters. Mulch is to be approved by the city representative. 3. Ground Covers a. Definition Ground covers are low growing plants that grow in colonies to form a solid mat over the surface of the ground. They spread by rhizomes, stolen or by roots, which form at the nodes of trailing branches that come in contact with the soil. These plants give a flat or two-dimensional effect to the landscape, such as but not limited to, archtotheca, osteopermum, trailing gazania and lantana, ivy, trachelospermum, baccharis, and varieties of ice plant. b. Ground Cover Trimming Ground cover shall be kept trimmed to the edge of sidewalks, light fixtures, driveways, mow strips, retaining walls and buildings. Ground cover shall be kept one (1) foot from fences, property lines, trees and shrubs. In no case shall ground cover be allowed to climb walls, fences, light fixtures, buildings, shrubs and/or trees unless otherwise approved by the City. c. Turf Care/Edging Coordination All turf cutting and turf edging will be completed in the same area on the same day. All debris clean-up shall be completed the same day. d. Cultivation DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 911 of 1126 17A The open soil between plants shall be regularly cultivated where the planting permits. Contractor shall pay special attention to the maintenance of the flowerbed and planter area. e. Replanting Replanting will be required to maintain the continuity of the ground cover area, and replacements shall be as approved by the City. 4. Irrigation a. Inspection Irrigation should be inspected daily as landscaping maintenance occurs . Any broken sprinklers heads , valve boxes or any other irrigation items shall be repaired immediately when possible. any damaged irrigation shall be communicated to the Public Works representative and entered in the daily log of activities. Irrigation sha ll also be inspected for coverage as needed, any deficiencies in coverage from the irrigation system shall be reported to the Public Works representative and entered in the daily log of activities. b. Adjustment An automatic irrigation system is provided at some sites for the Contractor's use to maintain optimum soil moisture content in order to ensure healthy, vigorous growth but shall not be intended as the only means of irrigation. Manual watering shall be required at all locations where an automatic irrigation system is not provided and shall be done so as to prevent runoff to adjacent streets, sidewalks and gutters Municipal Code, Chapter 8.44.060). Any over spraying of the sprinkler systems on to areas other than intended shall be corrected immediately. City shall be responsible for properly coordinating the various time clocks and adjusting the various watering schedules to provide adequate water to maintain all planted areas in a thriving condition and so as not to be interfered with by an interruption of electrical power or malfunctioning of the controller or control valves for more than two consecutive days. Contractor shall be required to water by other means if necessary to prevent deterioration of the areas affected. Contractor shall perform all irrigation work so as not to interfere with the public's use of the park facility. Contractor shall limit the use of water concurrent with the weather situation and to the satisfaction of the City. Contractor shall make minor adjustment to keep irrigation heads in proper operating condition at all times. Contractor shall adjust irrigation heads as necessary so that all water is directed away from streets, sidewalks and gutters (Municipal Code, Chapter DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 912 of 1126 18A 8.44.060). Contractor shall report irriga tion problems where landscape has been affected by lack of water. In the event of mandatory water rationing, the Contractor shall reduce water consumption on all landscape areas in accordance with instructions from the City. 5. Infection, Disease, and Pest Control Contractor shall provide a complete non -pesticide/herbicide solution to insect, disease and pest control as necessary or as directed by the City representative so as to keep plant materials in a healthy condition and free from insects and disease. Control of rodents, snails, slugs, and sow bugs, by use of traps is permissible. Contractor shall not use any poisonous materials. Contractor shall obtain the City's approval forty-eight (48) hours prior to the use of any mechanical or any other method of control. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to notify the City of any infection or disease of any trees or landscape. The labor and material needed to complete this section is considered normal maintenance, not extra work and no charge to the City. 6. Weed Control At all locations in the Contract. Complete removal of all weed growth shall be accomplished every week on a continuing basis, as weeds appear and not just once each week. Landscaped areas shall be weeded before any weeds reach four (4) inches in height. For the purpose of this agreement, a weed will be considered as "any undesirable or misplaced plant". Weeds shall be controlled either by hand or mechanical methods. 7. Annual Plantings Annual plantings refer to adding plants as specified at the specified location to remove dead plans and to replace them with similar plans to maintain the fullness and numbers of plants in the area. Contractor shall provide one-gallon drought tolerant plants annually for the planters at the City Hall entrance and the raised planter boxes on Hermosa Avenue between 10th and 14th Streets. Contractor shall provide annual drought tolerant re-planting at the Windmill planters and the Veteran’s Memorial prior to Veterans Day. 8. Replacement of Dead Plant Material DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 913 of 1126 19A Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining healthy plant material. Contractor shall be responsible for replacement (equal size) of any plant material, shrubs, bushes which through his/her act or omission dies during the length of this agreement. 9. Sand Play Areas Play areas covered by sand shall be kept free of weeds, litter, and debris. Sand shall be kept in a reasonably leveled condition as directed by the City to prevent the development of large holes or the exposure of equipment footings or foundations. Sand areas should be tilled and maintained in a manner so as to minimize the presence of densely compacted conditions. Play areas to be checked daily for broken glass and hazards, which need immediate correction. Sand shavings shall be swept from the adjoining walkways as directed by the City daily. Special care is to be taken in cleaning and maintaining the drinking fountains from sand-related problems and plugs. Contractor to replenish sand in sand play areas twice a year to maintain level at the designated level. Sand play areas exist at South Park, Valley Park, Seaview Park and Fort Lots of Fun . 10. Engineered Wood Fibers South Park The South Park Engineered Wood Fibers in the playground areas shall be replenished and compacted (2) two times a year per schedule to maintain the surface at the designated level. At no time the depth of the engineered wood Fibers shall be less than 8” after compaction. Additional material shall be added to achieve the standard required depth of the engineered wood fibers. 11. Park Furniture Park benches, tables, and drinking fountains to be kept clean daily and any damages or graffiti shall be reported to Public Works. Any stickers shall be removed. Any damaged park furniture shall be reported to the Public Works representative 12. Barbeques Barbeques (BBQs) are to be emptied of coals, ash, and litter daily and as needed. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 914 of 1126 20A 13. Decomposed Granite Decomposed Granite areas shall be kept in neat and clean condition, free from weeds and debris. Contractor shall keep low worn areas level by filling in low areas and compacting so as to provide a smooth safe surface. stabilizing agent needs to be applied to all repaired areas. Per manufacturer’s specifications The condition is to be maintained weekly. Contractor will be responsible for minor replacement of decomposed granite not to exceed 10 yards per year. 14. Trash Cans Trashcans located at all city Parks are to be maintained and emptied once a day 7 days a week including holidays from the month of June through September (summer months). Contractor will be responsible for trash bags and picking up any surrounding trash. Time of p ick up is to be coordinated. 15. Sidewalks at Parks Park Sidewalks are to be swept daily on service days and kept free of debris. Valley Park and South Park are to be swept 7 days a week. The sidewalk area in front of City Hall is to be swept daily. 16. Greenbelt a. The ice plant along the curbside around the trees and walk paths must be trimmed and maintained within a frequency to present a manicured aesthetic appearance. Curbside areas to be trimmed are not to exceed 18 inches from the curb. b. All tree branches must be trimmed that may be blocking any of the pathways; dead plants must be removed and replaced in a timely manner. c. Contractor shall be sensitive to the aesthetic nature of the Greenbelt in particular at the street intersection areas and shall provide sufficient detail efforts to produce an enhanced appearance. (This may require the removal and replacement of outdated/overgrown and/or unsightly landscaping.) Note: This activity shall be part of the contract price and not considered extra work. d. Wood chip replacement. Contractor will maintain the wood chips on the Greenbelt: The center walk path must have a minimum depth of three (3) inches of wood chips. The required wood chips are 3” Minus Wood Chips. Wood chips must be clea r of debris, stems, and/or branches that may present a difficulty to pedestrians Wood chips must be 3 -Inch shall not exceed a maximum of three inches in length. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 915 of 1126 21A Prior to wood chip installation, ground surface should be leveled with dirt. Repaired areas to be compacted before wood chips are installed. Wood chips are to be replenished throughout the entire Greenbelt pathway 2 times a year. The estimate is 400 cubic yards twice a year and as needed, which is estimated to be an additional 200 cubic yards. City Representative will coordinate and approve the same type of dried wood chips that is currently on the Greenbelt pathway. Mulch or wood chips must be maintained around the base of all trees. Some areas may require manual weed removal; attention must be given to identifying weeds vs. small plants. 16. Lawn Bowling Green Field Contractor will provide special care in maintaining the lawn bowling green. In particular: 1. Contractor shall provide a greens mower like or equal to a Scott-Bonner mower. (City staff must approve). 2. Contractor shall mow two times a week (Tuesday and Thursday), diagonally in both directions each day during the growing season. This can be reduced to two times a week diagonally in one direction each day during the dormant season. Mow in alternate diagonals during the dormant season. 3. Verticut once a month diagonally in both directions. 4. Fertilize six (6) times per year. 5. Aerate two (2) times per year. Complete the aeration by spreading and leveling holes and depressions with a top dressing of 30-grade sand. Contractor is to supply all materials. 6. Use approved weed removal (manual weed removal only). 7. Maintain the sandy ditch around the green. 8. Coordinate work periods with the city representative. 17. Special Care Instructions for Medians and Planters In addition to the description of general landscape maintenance services provided, special care is needed for the following medians and planters. These locations are listed by their proposal item number. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 916 of 1126 22A Item 28: Medians on Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue. This area consists of tree wells and raised asphalt medians requiring litter removal, weeding, and sweeping. Item 31: Medians on Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue. This is a raised asphalt median requiring litter removal, sweeping, and weeding. Item 32: Medians on Pier Avenue, from Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive. This area has tree grates will require litter removal. Item 33: Planters on 2nd Street and The Strand require weeding, cultivating, litter removal, and replanting. How often replanting, how many plans Item 36: Planters on Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand, have tree grates that will require litter removal. Item 37: Planters in the alley behind Longfellow Avenue and 30th Place have tree grates requiring litter removal. 18. Ball Field Maintenance Clark Field a. Baseball/Softball Field Maintenance Recognizing that the baseball/softball diamonds are high-use facilities and that the proper care and maintenance of these is critical to the safety and well-being of the user-public as well as a deterrent to liability litigation, it is necessary to establish standards to insure adequate playing conditions. The baseball/softball fields are to be maintained on a daily basis, Monday through Sunday during baseball season from February to July. During the off season, the baseball/softball diamonds shall be maintained on an as-need ed basis as determined by the City, normally 2-3 times a week, and coordinated with the slow pitch schedule. This work shall be completed before 12:00 PM. each scheduled day. Baseball/softball field maintenance includes watering, dragging, filling in sunken areas, and raking all sand areas for debris. For a complete set of specifications on the care and maintenance of baseball/softball diamonds see the special section titled "Care and Maintenance of Baseball and Softball Diamonds." Special mowing is required at the southeast filled as not to use heavy mowing equipment that could damage turf infield. The responsibility for the condition and maintenance of baseball/softball diamonds shall be as follows: DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 917 of 1126 23A A. Contractor’s employee shall be responsible for the areas in which the diamonds are located and shall be charged with the overall responsibility for the condition and maintenance of the diamonds. This individual shall, on a daily basis, observe the conditions of the diamonds and take those measures necessary to insure the suitability of the diamonds for play. Definition: Suitability for play - A diamond shall be deemed suitable for play when it is smooth, free of debris, ruts, berms and low spots or any unnamed condition deemed hazardous. B. Contractor’s employee shall meet with the City to inspect each City ball diamond and determine necessary heavy maintenance work to be completed on or before December 1st each year prior to the opening of baseball/softball season. Beginning with the field and turf maintenance the first week of December is mandatory. C. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to notify the City of any heavy maintenance work needed during the pre and playing season. D. Contractor shall be responsible for the installation of base stakes, pitcher and home plates. Contractor personnel shall be responsible for the burning of foul lines in advance of the playing season. E. Contractor shall be responsible for supplying all the additional “Ball Field Mix” (infield dirt) to complete the initial heavy maintenance. This work is to be performed as needed at the proposal cost for supplying an estimated 30 cubic yards of ballfield material. b. Preparation of ball diamond as done by contractor personnel during the regular season February 1st – July 31st A. Preparation of three diamonds shall be done by the Contractor. During the baseball season, diamonds must be cared for daily to provide a continuing high standard of condition. Such preparation is described, sequentially, below. B. Preliminary Watering Home plate and pitcher’s mound will receive the heaviest watering as these areas get most use during actual playing time. Slightly less water will be applied to 1st, 2nd, and 3 rd base areas. C. Leveling Using a garden rake with a two-foot metal strip welded to the back, the soil in the batter’s box and pitcher’s mound should be loosened, raked, shaped, leveled and tamped down firmly. If present, the dimple at the pitcher’s mound shall be maintained at a graduated elevation to 12” above the playing surface with a circumference of eight feet (8'). DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 918 of 1126 24A Soil, which has been worked away around each base, must be replaced in the proper area and tamped down firmly. c. Watering A. The diamond shall be watered thoroughly with the proper amount of water to provide a suitable condition for dragging. As a rule, the appearance of small water bubbles should indicate sufficient watering. B. In all watering of the diamonds, the correct procedure is to water away from yourself with the hose to the rear. Do not walk on the watered areas. d. Dragging A. Ball diamond infields require moisture penetration to prevent a hard, dry condition from developing. It is therefore important that daily dragging be completed t o break the crust. The drag used for this purpose should be a minimum 3' X 4' and have 2/3" protruding spikes. B. Upon completion of the crust -breaking drag, a smoothing drag shall be undertaken. The drag is similar to a metal foot scraper, constructed of heavy interwoven metal shaped. The size of the drag is 4' X 6'. C. In all dragging, the correct procedure is to begin in the area of the pitcher’s mound, and drag in overlapping, concentric circles until the entire skinned area is covered. Care should be exercised to prevent build -up of brick dust under the inner edge of the outfield grass causing a raised berm. c. Periodic Special Maintenance The daily dragging of the ball diamond is satisfactory within certain limits. However, after a period of continued maintenance of this type, it becomes necessary to take measures to ensure an even playing surface. A. A "drag", 5’ wide and 8' long, is used for this operation. B. The "drag", towed by a pick-up truck or power equipment, is used to cut down high spots, dragging the excess to low areas. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 919 of 1126 25A C. The "drag" includes an adjustable metal cutting blade approximately 5-1/2" wide that can be raised or lowered or set at different angles. D. This operation will be requested through the City to the Contractor’s supervisor responsible for the area. d. Inclement Weather Field Maintenance During the baseball season, both the preparation months of December, January and February and the playing season of February through July, the Contractor must assist in the removal of water from the infields in order to accelerate the drying out process. This could include pumping from the low spots. 19. Soccer Field Maintenance – Valley Park, Clark Field The soccer fields shall be maintained on a daily basis throughout the soccer season of September through December. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to make every effort to bring a field into acceptable condition during periods of intermittent inclement weather. Bare areas and worn areas shall be leveled prior to seeding as part of the contract as per the direction the city’s representative. During the off season, the soccer fields shall be maintained on an as-needed basis as specified in the section titled Turf Care. During the soccer season, all work on soccer fields shall be completed before 2:00 p.m. each day. Recognizing that soccer fields are a high use facility, and that their proper care and maintenance is critical to the safety and well-being of the user-public, and as a deterrent to liability litigation, it is necessary to establish standards to insure adequate playing conditions. All soccer fields shall be aerated twice per year. The turf shall be aerated with a self- propelled machine that removes cores of soil ¾” in diameter by four (4) to six (6) inches long, spaced no more than six (6) inches apart. Soil shall be moist to a depth of at least six (6) inches before aerating. Cores shall be removed from the field during or immediately after aeration. After completion of the aeration process, Contractor is to top dress the turf area with a top dressing City has approved (Earthworks Clay-Breaker or approved equal) with a machine specifically designed for such operations. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 920 of 1126 26A Contractor shall be responsible for any and all damages to sprinkler heads, piping, valve boxes, etc. during the aeration process, and shall return any damaged components to full operation upon completion of aeration activities. Contractor’s employee shall, on or before May 1st of each year, meet with City representatives to inspect each soccer field and determine the necessary heavy maintenance work to be completed prior to the opening of the soccer season. It shall be the responsibility of the City to make arrangements with the Contractor for the heavy maintenance deemed necessary (leveling, aeration, fertilization, seed planting, etc.). The City shall direct the Contractor as to the type and application of all turf seeding, if required. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to notify the City of any heavy maintenance work needed during the playing season. Contractor is responsible for all material necessary to complete this task 20. Maintenance of Tennis Courts, Basketball Courts, Pickleball Courts , and Skate Park Contractor shall wash down all tennis courts and the skateboard park using a water broom at the Community Center on the first Tuesday of every month between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and noon. Clark Field tennis courts, basketball courts, and pickleball courts are to be washed down using a water broom the first Monday of every month. Water outlets are provided at each of the tennis court areas. City will provide low flow water wands. Courts may require vacuuming if water restrictions are mandated. The basketball courts at Moondust Park and Valley Park are to be swept twice a month 21. Tree Maintenance Trees are divided into three categories: park trees, median trees, and downtown trees. All trees are to be trimmed annually except those which are over 25’ (twenty -five feet) tall which are trimmed every two years. Eucalyptus trees over 25,’ however, must be trimmed annually. Coral trees must be inspected every six (6) months and trimmed as necessary. An inspection alongside City staff must be made annually to determine the extent of trimming necessary for all trees. Trimming should be done as necessary for safety. Contractor is responsible for furnishing, supplying and performing tree staking. All trees requiring staking shall be securely staked at all times with a stake and secured to the stake with ties. Tree ties shall be inspected regularly to ensure against girdling and abrasion. Contractors are to inspect trees and notify the City of any diseased or hazardous conditions. The City representative shall be notified and must approve any tree trimming. All trees are to be shaped trimmed and pruned to the highest arboricultural standards DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 921 of 1126 27A as directed by Contractors certified Arborist. Trees less th an 25 feet to be trimmed a minimum of once a year. Any dead or damaged branches shall be removed back to a lateral branch. No stubs will be permitted. Contractor shall restrict growth through pruning to maintain safe road visibility, vehicle and pedestrian clearance, equipment accessibility, and to prevent or eliminate hazardous situations. Contractor is responsible for trimming all trees in all City parks and medians within the life of this agreement, in a time frame that is horticulturally correct for the best growth and maintenance of the trees. All tree trimming must begin the first week of October and be completed by January 31st. Park tree trimming scheduled must be completed once started and cannot be delayed unless approved by Public Works Superintendent. There will be no exception for not completing tree trimming within the allowed months. Trees not trimmed will be deducted from payment. Contractor is responsible for replacing any tree damaged due to Contractor negligence. Contractor shall be responsible for removing all dead trees including stump grinding. Stump grinding must be coordinated within 5 days of tree removal Planting of new trees will be negotiated as extra work. All tree branches shall be maintained to a height of thirteen (13) feet above street level for vehicle safety and sight distance, in addition to providing clearance for sidewalk areas at a minimum of 10 feet. Contractor shall comply within two (2) calendar days after the City requests said work. All trees 25’ and under are to be trimmed by the Contractor as part of the regular/annual maintenance routine for parks, medians, and downtown areas. Below are specifications for park trees and median/parkway trees. a. Park Trees Eucalyptus trees shall be trimmed, laced, sized, or reduced as needed annually. An inspection alongside City staff must be made annually to determine the extent of trimming necessary for these trees. All other park trees greater than 25’ (twenty feet) shall be trimmed, laced, sized, or reduced as needed per the following schedules: 1st Fiscal Year July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Community Center Complex Valley Park Edith Rodaway Friendship Park Sea View Parkette Fort Lots-of-Fun Moondust Parkette Greenwood Park Bicentennial Park DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 922 of 1126 28A Scout Parkette Ardmore Park 2nd Fiscal Year July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Greenbelt Clark Stadium Kay Etow Park Ingleside Park Noble Park South Park Sand Hill Parkette 3rd Fiscal Year July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 Community Center Valley Park Edith Rodaway Friendship Park Sea View Parkette Fort Lots-of-Fun Moon Dust Park Greenwood Park Bicentennial Park Scout Parkette Ardmore Park 4th Fiscal Year July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026 Greenbelt Clark Stadium Kay Etow Park Ingleside Park Noble Park South Park Sand Hill Parkette DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 923 of 1126 29A b. Median/Parkway Trees Median trees shall be trimmed, laced, sized, or reduced each year of the agreement. The Public Works Superintendent must approve all work timeframes. Location Number of Trees 14th Street at The Strand 6 14th Street at the Jarvis Memorial 2 15th Street at The Strand 6 16th Street – Walk Street 4 18th Street – Walk Street 5 22nd Street at The Strand 14 2nd Street at The Strand 12 Aviation Boulevard, from Harper west to Pacific Coast Highway 60 Gould Avenue/ Gould Terrace, from Pacific Coast Highway to Ardmore Avenue 24 Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street north to 35th Street, excluding the downtown area 135 Herondo Street, from Valley Drive west to Hermosa Avenue 17 Parking Structure at Hermosa Avenue and 13th Street 4 Upper Pier Avenue, from Valley Drive west to Hermosa Avenue All Lower Pier Avenue, from Hermosa Avenue west to The Strand 16 Palm Trees Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street to 35th Street All DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 924 of 1126 30A Note: 1. All palm trees will be trimmed to a 180° (degrees) cut and will be skinned as needed once per year. 2. All other trees will be trimmed, laced, sized, and shaped once per year. 3. All quantities are approximate. c. Tree Removal The Contractor shall remove all dead, and trees as directed. This activity shall be part of the contract price and not considered extra work. The City requires the Contractor to provide a Certified Arborist report before removing any trees. d. Tree Fertilization Palm trees in the downtown area and the medians on Hermosa Avenue are to be fertilized 4 times per year. DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 925 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach: Technical Approach & Methodology 5/19/22 Merchants Landscape will staff this contract according to the attached annual schedule. We will have a 3 man mow crew with a F350 full size truck and a trailer, 72”laser and 64”laser mower, with stick edger’s and weed eaters, mowing all the turf in 2 days. This 3 man crew will also be responsible for detailing park planter beds and working the greenbelt. In addition there will be a 2 man crew driving a Ford Ranger detailing the medians and the greenbelt 5 days per week, and mowing the bowling greens. There will be 2 man crew detailing the parks drinking fountains, checking the tot lots for debris, and broken glass, servicing trash cans, etc. Their objective will be to complete the items on the annual schedule calendar. In addition there will be an onsite Area Supervisor daily. He will be directly responsible for any daily communication that may be required with the City inspectors, he will be coordinating with the Branch manager Cesar Trujillo. Merchants Landscape will have a total of 280 man hours dedicated to these job sites weekly. All foremen are equipped with T-Mobile radios/phones, and the supervisors additionally will have smart phones for e-mailing. Merchants also maintains a local office and storage yard in Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Lane and 9th with full time secretaries to assist our area supervisors with reports and e-mails. We also maintain a 24 hour company manned dispatch center for any after hour needs. As you can see from our attached equipment inventory Merchants maintains over 2 million dollars worth of landscape equipment, ranging from numerous tractors and renovation equipment to over a 100 rider mowers. All maintained by 7 company mechanics. Quality Assurance It is the responsibility of the area supervisor to insure that the onsite crews are meeting the contract specifications. He accomplishes this with our site inspection reports, which will be turned into the branch manager each Monday. The area supervisor uses these inspection sheets to insure that he sees each site weekly and so he can schedule what areas may need specific attention. In addition we will have schedules for each crew showing how they will be rotating through the city sites. Trucks and trailers for this contract 1- 1- F 350 truck, with trailer. 2- 2- Ford Ranger. 3- 1- Utility cart. 8847 W. 9th St. , Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, Office-800-645-4881, Fax 909-981-1029 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8 Page 926 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 927 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 928 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 929 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 930 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 931 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 932 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 933 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 934 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 935 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 936 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 937 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 938 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 939 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 940 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 941 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 942 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 943 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 944 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 945 of 1126 DocuSign Envelope ID: E7F69444-0ECF-44D3-B9D9-2F4BAB367EF8Page 946 of 1126 Page 947 of 1126 Page 948 of 1126 Ardmore AveValley DrPacificCoastHwyProspectAve Monter e yBlvdP i e r Ave 1st St 27th St 8th St Longfellow A v e Aviation B l v d 2 2 n d S tHer mosaAveG ould Ave ArdmoreAveManhat t anAveValley Dr2nd St Artesia Blv d Kay Etow Parkette Bi-Centennial Park Ardmore ParkSouth Park Moondust Parkette Ocean View Parkette Edith Rodaway Friendship Park Fort Lots-of-Fun Park Clark Field Lawn Bowling Green Greenwood Park Noble Park Sea View Parkette Sand Hill Parkette Valley Park Shaffer Parkette Greenbelt/TrailGreenbelt/TrailGreenbelt/TrailCity Yard City Hall Clark Building Community Services Building HB Police Department HB Fire Department Community Center City Storage HB Library City of Hermosa Beach Parks & Facilities For RFP 22-005 Landscape Maintenance Services 0 0.25 0.50.13 Miles ¯ Page 949 of 1126 Page 950 of 1126 Page 951 of 1126 -13X- 1st Fiscal Year July 1, 2022 to June 30. 2023 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKETTES Item No. Park Name and Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 1 Ardmore Park 491 Ardmore Avenue $ $ 2 Bi-Centennial Park 550 4th Street $ $ 3 Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue $ $ 4 Fort Lots-of-Fun 1102 6th Street $ $ 5 Greenwood Park 1102 Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 6 Greenbelt/Trail Valley Drive $ $ 7 Kay Etow Parkette Monterey Boulevard and Lyndon Street $ $ 8 Lawn Bowling Green 861 Valley Drive $ $ 9 Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street $ $ 10 Noble Park 1400 The Strand $ $ 11 Ocean View Parkette 857 3rd Street $ $ 12 Sand Hill Parkette Palm Drive and Loma Walk $ $ 13 Scout Park 1402 Prospect Avenue $ $ 14 Sea View Parkette 1870 Prospect Avenue $ $ 15 Shaffer Parkette 3231 Ingleside Drive $ $ 16 South Park 425 Valley Park $ $ 17 Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive $ $ 18 PARKETTE 3rd Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ 19 PARKETTE 4TH Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ Total: $ $ Page 952 of 1126 -14X- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF CITY FACILITIES Item No. Facility Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 20 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive $ $ 21 City Storage 1110 6th Street $ $ 22 City Yard 555 6th Street $ $ 23 Clark Building 861 Valley Drive $ $ 24 Community Center 710 Pier Avenue $ $ 25 Community Services Building 1035 Valley Drive $ $ 26 Hermosa Beach Library 550 Pier Avenue $ $ 27 Hermosa Beach Fire Station 540 Pier Avenue $ $ 28 Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue $ $ Total $ $ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF MEDIANS, PLANTERS, AND PARKWAYS Item No. Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 29 MEDIANS – 35th Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 30 MEDIANS – Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue $ $ 31 MEDIANS – Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street to 35th Street $ $ 32 MEDIANS – Herondo Street, from Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue $ $ 33 MEDIANS – Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue $ $ 34 MEDIANS – Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive $ $ 35 PLANTERS – 2ND Street and the Strand $ $ 36 PLANTERS – 8th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ Page 953 of 1126 -15X- 37 PLANTERS – 10th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 38 PLANTERS – Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 39 PLANTERS – 14th Street and Ocean Drive $ $ 40 PLANTERS – 14th Street and East of Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 41 PLANTERS – 15TH Street and The Strand $ $ 42 PLANTERS – 16th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 43 PLANTERS – 18th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 44 PLANTERS – 22nd Street and The Strand $ $ 45 PLANTERS – 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue $ $ 46 PLANTERS – 28th Street and Valley Drive $ $ 47 PLANTERS – 29TH Street and Valley Drive $ $ 48 PLANTERS – Shakespeare, from 33rd Place to The Strand $ $ 49 PLANTERS – Parking Structure – south side only $ $ 50 PLANTERS – Parking Lot A $ $ 51 PLANTERS – All Beach Restrooms Area Planters on 2nd Street, 14th Street, and 22nd Street $ $ 52 PLANTERS – Parking Lot D (14th Street and Manhattan Avenue) $ $ 53 PLANTERS – Pier Avenue, from Hermosa Avenue to Ardmore Avenue $ $ 54 PLANTERS – 1201 The Strand (Schumacher Plaza) $ $ 55 PARKWAY – Gould Avenue and Gould Terrace $ $ Total $ $ Page 954 of 1126 -16X- BALL FIELD MAINTENANCE AT CLARK FIELD Item No. Description Cost per Field Total Monthly Cost Annual Cost 56 1 Soccer Field $ $ $ 57 3 Baseball Fields $ $ $ Total $ $ MAINTENANCE OF TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS, PICKLEBALL COURTS, AND SKATE PARK Item No. Description Cost per Field Monthly Cost Annual Cost 58 Tennis Courts (7 Total) $ $ $ 59 Pickleball Courts (4 total) $ $ $ 60 Basketball Courts (3 Total) $ $ $ 61 Skate Park $ $ Total $ $ PLACEMENT OF WOOD CHIPS Item No. Description Estimated Quantity Per Year Unit Price Total Cost 62 Greenbelt 1,000 Cubic Yards $ $ 63 South Park 40 Cubic Yards $ $ Total $ $ Page 955 of 1126 -17X- TREE MAINTENANCE Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 64 Trimming of Trees Over 25 Feet – Every Two Years $ $ 65 Trimming of Eucalyptus Trees Over 25 Feet - Annual $ $ 66 Trimming of Trees Under 25 Feet – Once a Year and as Needed $ $ 67 Maintenance of City Parkway Trees $ $ 68 Maintenance of Park Trees $ $ Total $ $ TREE REMOVAL Item No. Description Cost Per Tree 69 Removal of Trees Less Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ 70 Removal of Trees More Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ Total $ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN FIGURES $ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN WORDS In the event of a conflict between the numbers give in figures and in words, the words shall control. Page 956 of 1126 -18X- 2nd Fiscal Year July 1, 2023 to June 30. 2024 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKETTES Item No. Park Name and Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 1 Ardmore Park 491 Ardmore Avenue $ $ 2 Bi-Centennial Park 550 4th Street $ $ 3 Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue $ $ 4 Fort Lots-of-Fun 1102 6th Street $ $ 5 Greenwood Park 1102 Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 6 Greenbelt/Trail Valley Drive $ $ 7 Kay Etow Parkette Monterey Boulevard and Lyndon Street $ $ 8 Lawn Bowling Green 861 Valley Drive $ $ 9 Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street $ $ 10 Noble Park 1400 The Strand $ $ 11 Ocean View Parkette 857 3rd Street $ $ 12 Sand Hill Parkette Palm Drive and Loma Walk $ $ 13 Scout Park 1402 Prospect Avenue $ $ 14 Sea View Parkette 1870 Prospect Avenue $ $ 15 Shaffer Parkette 3231 Ingleside Drive $ $ 16 South Park 425 Valley Park $ $ 17 Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive $ $ 18 PARKETTE 3rd Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ 19 PARKETTE 4TH Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ Total: $ $ Page 957 of 1126 -19X- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF CITY FACILITIES Item No. Facility Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 20 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive $ $ 21 City Storage 1110 6th Street $ $ 22 City Yard 555 6th Street $ $ 23 Clark Building 861 Valley Drive $ $ 24 Community Center 710 Pier Avenue $ $ 25 Community Services Building 1035 Valley Drive $ $ 26 Hermosa Beach Library 550 Pier Avenue $ $ 27 Hermosa Beach Fire Station 540 Pier Avenue $ $ 28 Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue $ $ Total $ $ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF MEDIANS, PLANTERS, AND PARKWAYS Item No. Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 29 MEDIANS – 35th Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 30 MEDIANS – Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue $ $ 31 MEDIANS – Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street to 35th Street $ $ 32 MEDIANS – Herondo Street, from Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue $ $ 33 MEDIANS – Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue $ $ 34 MEDIANS – Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive $ $ 35 PLANTERS – 2ND Street and the Strand $ $ 36 PLANTERS – 8th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ Page 958 of 1126 -20X- 37 PLANTERS – 10th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 38 PLANTERS – Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 39 PLANTERS – 14th Street and Ocean Drive $ $ 40 PLANTERS – 14th Street and East of Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 41 PLANTERS – 15TH Street and The Strand $ $ 42 PLANTERS – 16th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 43 PLANTERS – 18th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 44 PLANTERS – 22nd Street and The Strand $ $ 45 PLANTERS – 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue $ $ 46 PLANTERS – 28th Street and Valley Drive $ $ 47 PLANTERS – 29TH Street and Valley Drive $ $ 48 PLANTERS – Shakespeare, from 33rd Place to The Strand $ $ 49 PLANTERS – Parking Structure – south side only $ $ 50 PLANTERS – Parking Lot A $ $ 51 PLANTERS – All Beach Restrooms Area Planters on 2nd Street, 14th Street, and 22nd Street $ $ 52 PLANTERS – Parking Lot D (14th Street and Manhattan Avenue) $ $ 53 PLANTERS – Pier Avenue, from Hermosa Avenue to Ardmore Avenue $ $ 54 PLANTERS – 1201 The Strand (Schumacher Plaza) $ $ 55 PARKWAY – Gould Avenue and Gould Terrace $ $ Total $ $ Page 959 of 1126 -21X- BALL FIELD MAINTENANCE AT CLARK FIELD Item No. Description Cost per Field Total Monthly Cost Annual Cost 56 1 Soccer Field $ $ $ 57 3 Baseball Fields $ $ $ Total $ $ MAINTENANCE OF TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS, PICKLEBALL COURTS, AND SKATE PARK Item No. Description Cost per Field Monthly Cost Annual Cost 58 Tennis Courts (7 Total) $ $ $ 59 Pickleball Courts (4 total) $ $ $ 60 Basketball Courts (3 Total) $ $ $ 61 Skate Park $ $ Total $ $ PLACEMENT OF WOOD CHIPS Item No. Description Estimated Quantity Per Year Unit Price Total Cost 62 Greenbelt 1,000 Cubic Yards $ $ 63 South Park 40 Cubic Yards $ $ Total $ $ Page 960 of 1126 -22X- TREE MAINTENANCE Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 64 Trimming of Trees Over 25 Feet – Every Two Years $ $ 65 Trimming of Eucalyptus Trees Over 25 Feet - Annual $ $ 66 Trimming of Trees Under 25 Feet – Once a Year and as Needed $ $ 67 Maintenance of City Parkway Trees $ $ 68 Maintenance of Park Trees $ $ Total $ $ TREE REMOVAL Item No. Description Cost Per Tree 69 Removal of Trees Less Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ 70 Removal of Trees More Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ Total $ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN FIGURES $ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN WORDS In the event of a conflict between the numbers give in figures and in words, the words shall control. Page 961 of 1126 -23X- 3rd Fiscal Year July 1, 2024 to June 30. 2025 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKETTES Item No. Park Name and Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 1 Ardmore Park 491 Ardmore Avenue $ $ 2 Bi-Centennial Park 550 4th Street $ $ 3 Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue $ $ 4 Fort Lots-of-Fun 1102 6th Street $ $ 5 Greenwood Park 1102 Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 6 Greenbelt/Trail Valley Drive $ $ 7 Kay Etow Parkette Monterey Boulevard and Lyndon Street $ $ 8 Lawn Bowling Green 861 Valley Drive $ $ 9 Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street $ $ 10 Noble Park 1400 The Strand $ $ 11 Ocean View Parkette 857 3rd Street $ $ 12 Sand Hill Parkette Palm Drive and Loma Walk $ $ 13 Scout Park 1402 Prospect Avenue $ $ 14 Sea View Parkette 1870 Prospect Avenue $ $ 15 Shaffer Parkette 3231 Ingleside Drive $ $ 16 South Park 425 Valley Park $ $ 17 Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive $ $ 18 PARKETTE 3rd Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ 19 PARKETTE 4TH Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ Total: $ $ Page 962 of 1126 -24X- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF CITY FACILITIES Item No. Facility Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 20 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive $ $ 21 City Storage 1110 6th Street $ $ 22 City Yard 555 6th Street $ $ 23 Clark Building 861 Valley Drive $ $ 24 Community Center 710 Pier Avenue $ $ 25 Community Services Building 1035 Valley Drive $ $ 26 Hermosa Beach Library 550 Pier Avenue $ $ 27 Hermosa Beach Fire Station 540 Pier Avenue $ $ 28 Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue $ $ Total $ $ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF MEDIANS, PLANTERS, AND PARKWAYS Item No. Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 29 MEDIANS – 35th Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 30 MEDIANS – Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue $ $ 31 MEDIANS – Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street to 35th Street $ $ 32 MEDIANS – Herondo Street, from Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue $ $ 33 MEDIANS – Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue $ $ 34 MEDIANS – Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive $ $ 35 PLANTERS – 2ND Street and the Strand $ $ 36 PLANTERS – 8th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ Page 963 of 1126 -25X- 37 PLANTERS – 10th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 38 PLANTERS – Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 39 PLANTERS – 14th Street and Ocean Drive $ $ 40 PLANTERS – 14th Street and East of Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 41 PLANTERS – 15TH Street and The Strand $ $ 42 PLANTERS – 16th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 43 PLANTERS – 18th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 44 PLANTERS – 22nd Street and The Strand $ $ 45 PLANTERS – 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue $ $ 46 PLANTERS – 28th Street and Valley Drive $ $ 47 PLANTERS – 29TH Street and Valley Drive $ $ 48 PLANTERS – Shakespeare, from 33rd Place to The Strand $ $ 49 PLANTERS – Parking Structure – south side only $ $ 50 PLANTERS – Parking Lot A $ $ 51 PLANTERS – All Beach Restrooms Area Planters on 2nd Street, 14th Street, and 22nd Street $ $ 52 PLANTERS – Parking Lot D (14th Street and Manhattan Avenue) $ $ 53 PLANTERS – Pier Avenue, from Hermosa Avenue to Ardmore Avenue $ $ 54 PLANTERS – 1201 The Strand (Schumacher Plaza) $ $ 55 PARKWAY – Gould Avenue and Gould Terrace $ $ Total $ $ Page 964 of 1126 -26X- BALL FIELD MAINTENANCE AT CLARK FIELD Item No. Description Cost per Field Total Monthly Cost Annual Cost 56 1 Soccer Field $ $ $ 57 3 Baseball Fields $ $ $ Total $ $ MAINTENANCE OF TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS, PICKLEBALL COURTS, AND SKATE PARK Item No. Description Cost per Field Monthly Cost Annual Cost 58 Tennis Courts (7 Total) $ $ $ 59 Pickleball Courts (4 total) $ $ $ 60 Basketball Courts (3 Total) $ $ $ 61 Skate Park $ $ Total $ $ PLACEMENT OF WOOD CHIPS Item No. Description Estimated Quantity Per Year Unit Price Total Cost 62 Greenbelt 1,000 Cubic Yards $ $ 63 South Park 40 Cubic Yards $ $ Total $ $ Page 965 of 1126 -27X- TREE MAINTENANCE Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 64 Trimming of Trees Over 25 Feet – Every Two Years $ $ 65 Trimming of Eucalyptus Trees Over 25 Feet - Annual $ $ 66 Trimming of Trees Under 25 Feet – Once a Year and as Needed $ $ 67 Maintenance of City Parkway Trees $ $ 68 Maintenance of Park Trees $ $ Total $ $ TREE REMOVAL Item No. Description Cost Per Tree 69 Removal of Trees Less Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ 70 Removal of Trees More Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ Total $ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN FIGURES $ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN WORDS In the event of a conflict between the numbers give in figures and in words, the words shall control. Page 966 of 1126 -28X- 4th Fiscal Year July 1, 2025 to June 30. 2026 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKETTES Item No. Park Name and Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 1 Ardmore Park 491 Ardmore Avenue $ $ 2 Bi-Centennial Park 550 4th Street $ $ 3 Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue $ $ 4 Fort Lots-of-Fun 1102 6th Street $ $ 5 Greenwood Park 1102 Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 6 Greenbelt/Trail Valley Drive $ $ 7 Kay Etow Parkette Monterey Boulevard and Lyndon Street $ $ 8 Lawn Bowling Green 861 Valley Drive $ $ 9 Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street $ $ 10 Noble Park 1400 The Strand $ $ 11 Ocean View Parkette 857 3rd Street $ $ 12 Sand Hill Parkette Palm Drive and Loma Walk $ $ 13 Scout Park 1402 Prospect Avenue $ $ 14 Sea View Parkette 1870 Prospect Avenue $ $ 15 Shaffer Parkette 3231 Ingleside Drive $ $ 16 South Park 425 Valley Park $ $ 17 Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive $ $ 18 PARKETTE 3rd Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ 19 PARKETTE 4TH Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ Total: $ $ Page 967 of 1126 -29X- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF CITY FACILITIES Item No. Facility Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 20 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive $ $ 21 City Storage 1110 6th Street $ $ 22 City Yard 555 6th Street $ $ 23 Clark Building 861 Valley Drive $ $ 24 Community Center 710 Pier Avenue $ $ 25 Community Services Building 1035 Valley Drive $ $ 26 Hermosa Beach Library 550 Pier Avenue $ $ 27 Hermosa Beach Fire Station 540 Pier Avenue $ $ 28 Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue $ $ Total $ $ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF MEDIANS, PLANTERS, AND PARKWAYS Item No. Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 29 MEDIANS – 35th Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 30 MEDIANS – Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue $ $ 31 MEDIANS – Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street to 35th Street $ $ 32 MEDIANS – Herondo Street, from Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue $ $ 33 MEDIANS – Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue $ $ 34 MEDIANS – Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive $ $ 35 PLANTERS – 2ND Street and the Strand $ $ 36 PLANTERS – 8th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ Page 968 of 1126 -30X- 37 PLANTERS – 10th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 38 PLANTERS – Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 39 PLANTERS – 14th Street and Ocean Drive $ $ 40 PLANTERS – 14th Street and East of Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 41 PLANTERS – 15TH Street and The Strand $ $ 42 PLANTERS – 16th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 43 PLANTERS – 18th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 44 PLANTERS – 22nd Street and The Strand $ $ 45 PLANTERS – 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue $ $ 46 PLANTERS – 28th Street and Valley Drive $ $ 47 PLANTERS – 29TH Street and Valley Drive $ $ 48 PLANTERS – Shakespeare, from 33rd Place to The Strand $ $ 49 PLANTERS – Parking Structure – south side only $ $ 50 PLANTERS – Parking Lot A $ $ 51 PLANTERS – All Beach Restrooms Area Planters on 2nd Street, 14th Street, and 22nd Street $ $ 52 PLANTERS – Parking Lot D (14th Street and Manhattan Avenue) $ $ 53 PLANTERS – Pier Avenue, from Hermosa Avenue to Ardmore Avenue $ $ 54 PLANTERS – 1201 The Strand (Schumacher Plaza) $ $ 55 PARKWAY – Gould Avenue and Gould Terrace $ $ Total $ $ Page 969 of 1126 -31X- BALL FIELD MAINTENANCE AT CLARK FIELD Item No. Description Cost per Field Total Monthly Cost Annual Cost 56 1 Soccer Field $ $ $ 57 3 Baseball Fields $ $ $ Total $ $ MAINTENANCE OF TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS, PICKLEBALL COURTS, AND SKATE PARK Item No. Description Cost per Field Monthly Cost Annual Cost 58 Tennis Courts (7 Total) $ $ $ 59 Pickleball Courts (4 total) $ $ $ 60 Basketball Courts (3 Total) $ $ $ 61 Skate Park $ $ Total $ $ PLACEMENT OF WOOD CHIPS Item No. Description Estimated Quantity Per Year Unit Price Total Cost 62 Greenbelt 1,000 Cubic Yards $ $ 63 South Park 40 Cubic Yards $ $ Total $ $ Page 970 of 1126 -32X- TREE MAINTENANCE Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 64 Trimming of Trees Over 25 Feet – Every Two Years $ $ 65 Trimming of Eucalyptus Trees Over 25 Feet - Annual $ $ 66 Trimming of Trees Under 25 Feet – Once a Year and as Needed $ $ 67 Maintenance of City Parkway Trees $ $ 68 Maintenance of Park Trees $ $ Total $ $ TREE REMOVAL Item No. Description Cost Per Tree 69 Removal of Trees Less Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ 70 Removal of Trees More Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ Total $ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN FIGURES $ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN WORDS In the event of a conflict between the numbers give in figures and in words, the words shall control. Page 971 of 1126 -32X-2- IN WITNESS WHEREOF CONTRACTOR executed this proposal as of date set forth: Signature of Proposer: Signer’s Name: Company Name: Date:_______________________________________________ Page 972 of 1126 7B 2.Descriptions of Items in the Proposal Schedule The following descriptions of Proposal Items are intended to clarify and expand on the description of Proposal Items in the Proposal Schedule. All items of work described shall be included in the amount proposal for that item. The following tables provide the items of work to be completed at each location. For specifications about the work, see Section 2.1- Description of Work in Special Provisions. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKETTES Item No.Park Name and Address Description of Work 1 Ardmore Park 491 Ardmore Avenue •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 2 Bi-Centennial Park 550 4th Street •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 3 Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture •Planters •Basketball Court •Decomposed Granite Care •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 4 Fort Lots-of-Fun 1102 6th Street •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture •Planters •Trash Cans (Only from June to September) •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 5 Greenwood Park 1102 Pacific Coast Highway •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 6 Greenbelt •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains •Planters •Exercise Equipment •Fire Pit •Entrance Ways to Wood Chip Path •Litter Control Page 973 of 1126 8B 7 Kay Etow Parkette Monterey Boulevard and Lyndon Street •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture •Planters •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 8 Clark Field 861 Valley Drive •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains •One (1) Tennis Court •Planters •Sidewalks •Litter Control •Two (2) Basketball Courts •Four (4) Pickleball Courts •Lawn Bowling Green • 9 Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture •Planters •Sidewalks •One (1) Basketball Court •Trees •Litter Control 10 Noble Park 1400 The Strand •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •Litter Control •Trees •Trash Cans - (Only From June to September) •Sidewalks •Decomposed Granite Path •Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains 11 Ocean View Parkette 857 3rd Street •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 12 Sand Hill Parkette Manhattan Avenue and Loma Drive •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •Stairs •Sidewalks •Tree •Litter Control 13 Scout Parkette 1402 Prospect Avenue •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control 14 Sea View Parkette 1870 Prospect Avenue •Turf Care •Playground Equipment •Park Furniture •Planters •Irrigation •Trash Cans (Between June and September) •Sidewalks •Trees •Litter Control •BBQ 15 Shaffer Parkette •Turf Care •Sidewalks Page 974 of 1126 9B 3231 Ingleside Drive •Park Furniture •Planters •BBQ •Trees •Litter Control 16 South Park 425 Valley Park •Turf Care •Irrigation •Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains •Sidewalks •Trees •Planters •BBQ •Playground •Decomposed Granite Pathway •Litter Control •Trash Cans (June to September) 17 Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •BBQ •Litter Control •Trees •Playground •Fire Pit •Trash Cans (June To September) •Sidewalks •Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains •One (1) Basketball Court 18 PARKETTE 3rd Street and Prospect Avenue •Tree •Turf •Irrigation 19 PARKETTE 4th Street and Prospect Avenue •Trees •Turf •Irrigation •Shrubs •Shrubs LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF CITY FACILITIES Item No. Facility Name and Address Description of Work 20 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive •Irrigation •Sidewalks •Litter Control •Planters • Trees • Entrances • Trash Cans Note: City Hall includes the front of the building and Bard Street behind the building. To examine the area behind City Hall, Proposer should contact Public Works. 21 City Storage 1110 6th Street •Litter Control •Sidewalks •Entrances • Irrigation • Planters • Trees 22 City Yard 555 6th Street •Litter Control • Sidewalks • Trees Page 975 of 1126 10B 23 Clark Building 861 Valley Drive •Turf Care •Litter Control •Sidewalks •Planters • Trees • Entrances • Irrigation 24 Community Center 710 Pier Avenue •Turf Care •Irrigation •Planters •Entrances • Litter Control • Sidewalks 25 Community Services Building 1035 Valley Drive •Turf Care •Litter Control • Sidewalks • Trees • Picnic Tables 26 Hermosa Beach Library 550 Pier Avenue •Litter Control •Sidewalks •Planters • Entrances 27 Hermosa Beach Fire Station 540 Pier Avenue •Litter Control •Sidewalks •Planters • Trees • Benches • Entrances 28 Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue •Litter Control •Sidewalks •Planters • Trees • Stairs • Benches LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES Item No. Location Description of Work 29 MEDIANS – 35th Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand •Plants •Irrigation •Litter Control 30 MEDIANS – Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue •Palms •Irrigation •Litter Control 31 MEDIANS – Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street to 35th Street •Plants •Trees •Irrigation •Litter Control 32 MEDIANS – Herondo Street, from Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue •Palms •Irrigation •Litter Control 33 MEDIANS – Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue •Weed Removal Page 976 of 1126 11B 34 MEDIANS – Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Ardmore Avenue •Planters have tree grates requiring litter removal. Planters are located on the sidewalks on the north and south sides of Pier Avenue. 35 PLANTERS – 2ND Street and the Strand •Plants •Palms •Irrigation •Litter Control 36 PLANTERS – 8th Street and Pacific Coast Highway •Plants •Litter Control 37 PLANTERS – 10th Street and Pacific Coast Highway •Plant •Irrigation •Litter Control 38 PLANTERS – Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand •Palm Trees •Irrigation •Litter Control •Planters have tree grates requiring litter removal. 39 PLANTERS – 14th Street and Ocean Drive •Plants •Litter Control 40 PLANTERS – 14th Street and East of Pacific Coast Highway •Palms •Irrigation •Litter Control 41 PLANTERS – 15TH Street and The Strand •Plants •Irrigation •Litter Control 42 PLANTERS – 16th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand •Plants •Irrigation •Litter Control 43 PLANTERS – 18th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand •Plants •Trees •Irrigation •Litter Control 44 PLANTERS – 22nd Street and The Strand •Plants •Palms •Irrigation •Litter Control 45 PLANTERS – 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue •Plants •Trees •Irrigation •Litter Control 46 PLANTERS – 28th Street and Valley Drive •Plants •Litter Control 47 PLANTERS – 29TH Street and Valley Drive •Plants •Litter Control Page 977 of 1126 11B-2 48 PLANTERS – Shakespeare, from 33rd Place to The Strand •Plants •Litter Control 49 PLANTERS – Parking Structure – south side only •Plants •Irrigation •Litter Control 50 PLANTERS – Parking Lot A •Plants •Irrigation •Litter Control 51 PLANTERS – All Beach Restrooms Area Planters on 2nd Street, 14th Street, and 22nd Street •Palms •Irrigation •Litter Control 52 PLANTERS – Parking Lot D (14th Street and Manhattan Avenue) •Irrigation •Trees •Plants •Litter Control 53 PLANTERS – Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Ardmore Avenue •Planters have tree grates requiring litter removal. •Litter Control 54 PLANTERS – 1201 The Strand (Schumacher Plaza) •Plants and Irrigation above the bench. •Palm Trees and Irrigation on the south side. •Litter Control 55 PARKWAY – Gould Avenue and Gould Terrace •Irrigation •Trees •Ground cover •Litter Control r Note: Maintenance applies to the flat area only, which is owned by the City of Hermosa Beach. BALL FIELD MAINTENANCE AT CLARK FIELD Item No. Field Type Description of Work 56 1 Soccer Field •To be maintained daily during soccer season (September through December). •To be maintained on an as-needed basis, as determined by the City. •Litter Control. 57 3 Baseball Fields •To be maintained daily during the regular season (February 1st through July 31st). Page 978 of 1126 11B-3 •To be maintained on an as-needed basis, as determined by the City, normally 2-3 times a week. •Litter Control. MAINTENANCE OF TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS, PICKLEBALL COURTS, AND SKATE PARK Item No. Item Type Location Description 58 Tennis Courts Clark Field 861 Valley Drive •To be washed down once a month. Community Center 710 Pier Avenue •To be washed down once a month. •Plant growth should be edged so no plant material (ivy) is on the court surfaces. 59 Pickleball Courts Clark Field 861 Valley Drive •To be washed down once a month. 60 Basketball Courts Clark Field 861 Valley Drive •To be washed down once a month. Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue •To be washed down once a month. Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street •To be swept. As part of this RFP, Proposer is encouraged to recommend a schedule of maintenance for sweeping the basketball court. Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive •To be swept. As part of this RFP, Proposer is encouraged to recommend a schedule of maintenance for sweeping the basketball court. 61 Skate Park Community Center 710 Pier Avenue •To be washed down once a month. •Litter removal. Page 979 of 1126 11B-4 PLACEMENT OF WOOD CHIPS Item No. Location Description 62 Greenbelt Wood chips are to be replaced twice a year and as needed. 63 South Park Wood chips in the play area are to be replaced twice a year. TREE MAINTENANCE Item No. Description Specification 64 Trimming of Trees Over 25 Feet Every Two Years 65 Trimming of Eucalyptus Trees Over 25 Feet Annually 66 Trimming of Trees Under 25 Feet Once a Year and as Needed 67 Maintenance of City Parkway Trees See details in Section 2 Description of Work Items – No. 21 – Tree Maintenance. 68 Maintenance of Park Trees See details in Section 2 Description of Work Items – No. 21 – Tree Maintenance. TREE REMOVAL Item No. Description Specification 69 Removal of Trees Less Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) See details in Section 2 Description of Work Items – No. 21 – C. Tree Removal. 70 Removal of Trees More Than 25’ (twenty- five feet) See details in Section 2 Description of Work Items – No. 21 – C. Tree Removal. Page 980 of 1126 24B Item 30: Medians on Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue. This area consists of tree wells and raised asphalt medians requiring litter removal, weeding, and sweeping. Item 33: Medians on Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue. This is a raised asphalt median requiring litter removal, sweeping, and weeding. Item 34: Medians on Pier Avenue, from Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive. This area has tree grates will require litter removal. Item 35: Planters on 2nd Street and The Strand require weeding, cultivating, litter removal, and replanting. How often replanting, how many plans Item 38: Planters on Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand, have tree grates that will require litter removal. 18.Ball Field Maintenance Clark Field a.Baseball/Softball Field Maintenance Recognizing that the baseball/softball diamonds are high-use facilities and that the proper care and maintenance of these is critical to the safety and well-being of the user-public as well as a deterrent to liability litigation, it is necessary to establish standards to insure adequate playing conditions. The baseball/softball fields are to be maintained on a daily basis, Monday through Sunday during baseball season from February to July. During the off season, the baseball/softball diamonds shall be maintained on an as-needed basis as determined by the City, normally 2-3 times a week, and coordinated with the slow pitch schedule. This work shall be completed before 12:00 PM. each scheduled day. Baseball/softball field maintenance includes watering, dragging, filling in sunken areas, and raking all sand areas for debris. For a complete set of specifications on the care and maintenance of baseball/softball diamonds see the special section titled "Care and Maintenance of Baseball and Softball Diamonds." Special mowing is required at the southeast filled as not to use heavy mowing equipment that could damage turf infield. The responsibility for the condition and maintenance of baseball/softball diamonds shall be as follows: A.Contractor’s employee shall be responsible for the areas in which the diamonds are located and shall be charged with the overall responsibility for the condition and maintenance of the diamonds. Page 981 of 1126 Page 982 of 1126 Page 983 of 1126 Questions for RFP No. 22-005 ~ Landscape Maintenance Services 1. Are we suppose to email the public works director we downloaded the plans etc? No. While the Notice and RFP document state “To be considered as a responsive proposer you must email the Public Works Superintendent listed on the Request for Proposals to confirm you downloaded the Plans, Specification, and Construction Documents from the City website. This action will add your company name to the plan holder list.”, this is not required. Contractors are not required to email the Public Works Superintendent or the City to be considered a responsive proposer. The only documents to download is the RFP document found on the PlanetsBid. 2. Do we have to self-perform or can we sub it out? Addendum 1 specified the work is to be self-performed. However, the Contractor may use a subcontractor for some of the tasks. The requirement is for the Prime Contractor to perform 51% of the contract amount and provide a list of the Subcontractor(s) proposed to be used. Subcontractor(s) must possess appropriate licenses. A reference sheet for both the Prime Contractor and Subcontractor(s) is required. 3. Tree Trimming should be done with a C61/D49 license. Can you add this requirement? No. Although Addendum 1 noted “Each Proposer shall possess a valid State of California Contractors License Class C-27 Landscaping and C-61 Limited Specialty Classification/ D-49 Tree Service issued by the California State License Board. The successful Contractor must also possess a current City business license,” it is not applicable. . It is appropriate for C-27 licensed contractors to perform all of the work that D49-Tree Service contractors perform. This includes stand-alone tree service projects and larger overall landscaping projects, as per in this Landscaping Maintenance Services Agreement. The Contractor is only required to have a C-27 License to perform all items in the proposal. For tree trimming, the Contractor or Subcontractor may have a C-27 License or C-61/D- 49 license. 4. Will the wage requirement for Tree Maintenance, be the prevailing wage rates for Tree Maintenance Laborer? Yes. Per Addendum 1, prevailing wages apply to all categories of work in this contract. 5. How many trees are in the city? There are approximately1,800 trees of various sizes and species within the City. See link below for City tree inventory. Page 984 of 1126 https://hermosabeachca.treekeepersoftware.com/index.cfm?deviceWidth=1920 6. Are the Landscape Maintenance Areas currently up to the City’s specs? Overall, the landscape maintenance areas are currently up the City’s specifications. Some work, such as weed abatement, is needed to bring up to City standard in some areas. 7. Tree trimming – will the City provide traffic control and/or detours if necessary? No. A traffic control plan to be submitted prior to start of work per standards in CAMUTCD or WATCHBOOK, as specified in the RFP document. The traffic control plan will remain on file for the duration of the contract. Minor adjustments may be applicable. 8. Is all irrigation operational? Yes. 9. How old is the irrigation system? The irrigation system is functional and has been upgraded throughout the years. It will continue to be upgraded. 10. Plants, shrubs, trees, or other plant material damaged by vandalism, do we replace and invoice them separately? The Contractor is to receive approval of the City prior to replacement of plants, shrubs, trees, or other plant material damaged by vandalism. Costs are to be either added to the monthly invoice or a separate invoice, which is to be determined by City at time of work. 11. irrigation that is damaged by vandalism, do we replace and invoice separately? Contractor to receive approval by the City prior to completing any repairs and/or replacements. Cost to be either added to monthly invoice or a separate invoice, which is to be determined by City at time of work. 12. Is there a place to store our equipment? Yes. Space of approximately 17’x 38’ will be provided at the City Yard for the contractor. 13. How are the homeless individuals managed (encampments)? Do we pick up the loose litter? Contractor to pick up litter upon City’s request. Homeless encampments are rare in the City and have little impact with landscaping work. It is estimated that two (2) to five (5) encampments are found in a year. 14. For bulky, large items that are trash, can we dispose at the City dump? Page 985 of 1126 Yes, all green waste and trash can be disposed of at City Yard if contractor desires to. 15. Gophers – are we allowed to use cO2 smoke, or do we use traps only? Gophers are to be trapped only. 16. Regarding blowers – mechanical devices… does that include electric blowers? Yes, no blowers of any kind may be used in the City. 17. Do you require a bidder’s bond? No bidder’s bond is required. 18. We would appreciate the City contract term for cancelation for convenience with a 30-dy notice. Is this possible? Yes, City will provide a 30-day notice for cancelation of contract. 19. Emergencies – we charge an emergency rate for trees and irrigation/water; do we bill separately? Yes, all emergency work to be billed separately. Emergency is to be completed only when called out by City. Contractor is required to submit Hourly Rates Sheet for different types of work along with the proposal. 20. Are there recognized city holidays? Yes. The following holidays are observed: New Year’s Day Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday President’s Day Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Veteran’s Day Thanksgiving Day Christmas Day 21. C-61 Limited Specialty Classification/D-49 Tree Service required? For several years, C-27 covered tree trimming? No. Although Addendum 1 noted “Each Proposer shall possess a valid State of California Contractors License Class C-27 Landscaping and C-61 Limited Page 986 of 1126 Specialty Classification/ D-49 Tree Service issued by the California State License Board. The successful Contractor must also possess a current City business license,” it is not applicable. . It is appropriate for C-27 licensed contractors to perform all of the work that D49-Tree Service contractors perform. This includes stand-alone tree service projects and larger overall landscaping projects, as per in this Landscaping Maintenance Services Agreement. The Contractor is only required to have a C-27 License to perform all items in the proposal. For tree trimming, the Contractor or Subcontractor may have a C-27 License or C-61/D- 49 license. 22. As tree trimming is part of the scope and prevailing wage is required; California Prevailing Wage Determination SC-102-X-20-2022-1 Craft: Tree Maintenance Laborer, covers this work. Is it a correct assumption that contractors submitting proposals are to use this wage determination for all tree trimming work on this contract? There is a significant difference between the Landscape Maintenance Laborer wage determination and the Tree Maintenance Laborer determination and requirements. Yes. Per Addendum 1, prevailing wages apply to all categories of work in this contract. 23. Who is the current contractor? Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. is the current contractor. 24. Has the scope changed, or areas added/removed from the current contract as compared to this contract going out to bid? Yes, scope has been revised with numerous clarifications with this RFP. 25. II. Scope of Services/Maintenance Services Agreement, Term. Will the City allow for yearly adjustments in the contract value during the initial 4-year term, and the 1-year extension based on the CPI? Per the RFP, Contactor shall provide cost for the contract for each fiscal year. Any increase between the years should be in line with estimated CPI. Contractor to propose cost at end of fourth year for the 1 year extension if City wishes to pursue a 1 year extension. 26. D. Level of Maintenance, item 2 Deficiencies. Has the current contractor received a deficiency notice or had payment withheld during the previous contract term? No deficient notices have been issued or payments withheld to current contractor. 27. Item O. Disposal of Debris states "All debris shall be disposed of at the City Yard." Does this mean that the City will provide a location in the City Yard for the Page 987 of 1126 contractor to place a 40cy dumpster (and pays for dumping it at contractor expense) or does this mean that the City will provide the dumpster and pay for the dumping? The City currently provides green waste and trash dumpsters. The City pays for the waste disposal fees. The Contractor does not pay any fees. 28. Item R. Arborist Services. Where in the submittal documents shall we list the ISA Certified Arborist? This information should be provided on the Hourly Rate Sheet or Subcontractor List to be submitted with this RFP. 29. Description of items in the Proposal Schedule, Table Column Description of Work. In numerous places it states "Daily" is this 7-days per week? Contractor to work 5 days per week Monday through Friday, except for Section 2, No. 14 Trash Cans in Exhibit A, which is seven (7) days a week during the specified months. 30. Field Maintenance, item 60 Soccer Field, "Maintained Daily" September through December. Working Hours are described as "Monday through Sunday", is the intent here 7-days per week mowing? If not, what mowing frequency is required and is a reel mower required? The working hours are five (5) days per week Monday through Friday. The turf should be mowed two (2) times a week. 31. Field Maintenance, item 60 Soccer Field and item 61 Baseball Fields, is the contractor responsible for striping the fields? If so, what is the frequency and what kind of material will be required? Contractor is not responsible for striping of any fields. 32. Field Maintenance, Item 61 Baseball fields, it states "maintained daily" does this mean mowing 7 days a week? The working hours are five (5) days per week Monday through Friday. The turf should be mowed two (2) times a week. 33. Field Maintenance, Item 61 Baseball fields, It states "normally 2-3 times a week" is this the expected frequency for mowing? Field should be mowed two (2) times a week. 34. Placement of Wood Chips, items 65 & 66. It uses the word "replace" does this mean removal of the existing wood chips and placing new wood chips or is intent to "replenish"? Replenish. For item 66 and 67 (see Addendum 2) Contactor will not be required to remove any existing woods chips during replenishment work. Page 988 of 1126 35. Placement of Wood Chips, items 65 & 66. Were these requirements a part of the current contract? If so, should we expect it to be up to specifications by the current contractor prior to starting work on the new contract? For item 66 and 67 (see Addendum 2), yes. This is a requirement in the current contract. These items will be up to City specifications. 36. Section 2 Description of Work 1.a Turf Care states are mulching mowers currently used on the contract? Yes. 37. Section 2, 2.a Mulch. Were these requirements a part of the current contract? If so, should we expect it to be up to specifications by the current contractor prior to starting work on the new contract? Yes. This is a requirement in the current contract. These items will be up to City specifications. 38. Section 3, Groundcovers d.e Replanting, If the requirement for replanting is not the fault of the Contractor will this be considered extra work? Replanting work as required by the contract or if at fault by contractor is not extra work. Only new planting areas are considered extra work upon City request and approval. 39. Section 4.a Irrigation inspection. What irrigation repairs are considered extra work and what irrigation repairs are considered a part of the routine work? Routine work is mainly for repair, replacement, and adjustment of sprinkler heads. Fixing of irrigation pipes and lines are to be consider extra work if requested by the City. 40. Section 4, b. Irrigation adjustment mentions "manual watering". How many locations are currently being manually watered? No areas are currently being manual watered. Manual watering is only done under special circumstances when irrigation is down. 41. Section 7 Annual plantings. How many square feet of area and what is the on- center spacing for the 1-gallon plants described in this section? Approximately 13,280 sq. ft. with three foot spacing for the 1-gallon plants are to be provided per year. 42. Section 7 Annual plantings. What species of "drought tolerant plants" would be acceptable to the City for these 1 gallon plants? Page 989 of 1126 The City does not have a list. Contractor is to provide a list of proposed plants to the City for approval prior to planting. 43. Section 7 Annual plantings. is this considered extra work? No. This is not considered extra work. 44. Section 9 Sand Play Areas. The word "Daily" is used in this section. Does this mean 7-days a week? In this section, the word “Daily” means five (5) days a week, Monday through Friday. 45. Section 9 Sand Play Areas, replenishment. Are we to expect the current contractor to bring these areas up to specification before the new contract starts? Yes. 46. Engineered Wood Fiber. What is the variety of engineered wood fiber acceptable to the City (or has been used in the past which was acceptable)? Engineered wood fiber is to be per ASTM F1292. 47. 11 & 12 Park Funiture and Barbeques. The word "daily" is used in these sections. Does this mean 7-days a week? In this section, the word “Daily” means five (5) days a week, Monday through Friday. 48. 14 Trash Cans. How many trash cans need to be serviced in this contract? There are approximately 130 trash cans present across City parks, but that number may change over the term of the contract. 49. Greenbelt item c. How many plants have been removed and replaced during the last contract term? Greenbelt plants have only been removed and replaced due to the fault of the Contractor. Therefore, the work was not considered extra work. The Contractor was responsible for removal and replacement of damaged plants. The City may request additional planting, which would be considered extra work. 50. The specifications mention that the license requirements for this project include the Class “A” and/or the C-27 Landscape Maintenance License. Due to the inclusion of tree maintenance in this project and the fact that the state of California classifies tree maintenance separate from landscape maintenance to include a separate prevailing wage classification, will the city consider either A. Separating the tree maintenance services into its own contract. Or B. including the requirement to have both the C-27 landscape and the C-61/D-49 tree maintenance contractor’s license. Page 990 of 1126 No. Although Addendum 1 noted “Each Proposer shall possess a valid State of California Contractors License Class C-27 Landscaping and C-61 Limited Specialty Classification/ D-49 Tree Service issued by the California State License Board. The successful Contractor must also possess a current City business license,” it is not applicable. . It is appropriate for C-27 licensed contractors to perform all of the work that D49-Tree Service contractors perform. This includes stand-alone tree service projects and larger overall landscaping projects, as per in this Landscaping Maintenance Services Agreement. The Contractor is only required to have a C-27 License to perform all items in the proposal. For tree trimming, the Contractor or Subcontractor may have a C-27 License or C-61/D- 49 license. Per Addendum 1, prevailing wages apply to all categories of work in this contract. 51. Can you provide us with the City’s tree inventory (for trees included in this contract/project)? Preferably in .shapefile format See City’s tree inventory provided. https://hermosabeachca.treekeepersoftware.com/index.cfm?deviceWidth=1920 52. On the cost proposal form would it be possible to change the submittal requirements for the Tree Maintenance Portion in the following ways: first, please change the “Monthly Cost” column to “Per Tree”. Second, please include the actual or estimated Quantities of trees to receive pruning in each category in a new column. Third, please break the line items for tree maintenance into Diameter Classes (DBH) for each pruning cycle. These adjustments to the tree portion of the tree maintenance section will provide the city with more cost- effective bids. No. See City’s tree inventory provided. https://hermosabeachca.treekeepersoftware.com/index.cfm?deviceWidth=1920 53. Regarding the Tree Removal cost proposal section. The removals are broken into height categories, can the city change that section in the following way: one line item for “Tree and Stump Rem oval” at a “Per Inch” unit cost. A second line item for “Tree Removal -Flush Cut Only” at a “Per Inch” unit cost. All tree removal is to include stump removal. Flush cut tree removal is prohibited. Cost is to be per tree. 54. How many Parkway trees are in the city (that are included on this contract/project)? See City’s tree inventory provided. Page 991 of 1126 https://hermosabeachca.treekeepersoftware.com/index.cfm?deviceWidth=1920 55. How many Park trees are in the city (that are included on this contract/project)? See City’s tree inventory provided in the link below. https://hermosabeachca.treekeepersoftware.com/index.cfm?deviceWidth=1920 56. Due to the traffic control requirements for this project, will the city include the requirement for the contractor to have the C-31 Traffic control license? No. Contractor does not need to have the C-31 License. However, Contractor is required to submit traffic control plans per CAMUTCD or WATCHBOOK standards before the beginning of the work. 57. The specifications mention all debris must be disposed of at the City Yard, does this include chipped materials generated during tree maintenance operations? Is there a cost to the contractor for dumping at this location? Yes. City Yard to provide dumpster for green waste at no cost to Contractor. 58. The specifications mention that the contractor shall provide arborist services when requested – would the City consider adding the requirement for the contractor to have Certified Arborists on staff? All arborist services and reports are to be done by an ISA certified arborist, who can be a subcontractor. 59. Would the city consider adding a line item for “Arborist Services and Reports” at a “Per Hour” rate? No. Arborist services and reports are part of the contract work as specified. Contractor is required to submit the Hourly Rate Sheet for those services for the City to use for extra work outside of the contract. 60. How many Palm trees are there? would it be possible to separate the Palm trees by species (Queen, King, Date, Fan) into their own line items on the cost proposal form? Including actual or estimated quantities, trimming cycle (annual/bi- annual)? See City’s tree inventory provided. https://hermosabeachca.treekeepersoftware.com/index.cfm?deviceWidth=1920 No, the species of palm trees will not be separated. 61. Would it be possible to have the Arboriculture industry standards listed as being required- ie. ISA and ANZI A300? All arborist services and reports are to be done by an ISA certified arborist, who can be a subcontractor. Page 992 of 1126 62. What is the annual budget for tree maintenance for this project? There is no specific annual budget for tree maintenance as it is part of the proposal cost. Page 993 of 1126 CONTRACTOR’S HOURLY RATES LABOR CLASSIFICATION/TITLE (All Disciplines) HOURLY COST Page 994 of 1126 Page 995 of 1126 Page 996 of 1126 Questions for RFP No. 22-005 ~ Landscape Maintenance Services 1. How much has the current contractor been paid during the last fiscal year for the base contract work? Approximately $300,000. 2. What is the total payment made to the current contractor last fiscal year for all regular and extra work on this contract? Approximately $300,000 was paid last fiscal year for regular contract work with little extra work. This fiscal year, approximately $34,097was paid for extra work. 3. What was the actual expenditure for tree maintenance services for the previous fiscal year? That expenditure is not a line item in the current contract and is part of the overall contract. It is now a separate line item in the proposal. 4. What portion of the tree work is currently being performed? Can you provide us with the current trimming schedule and/or locations? The current tree work schedules is as follows: All trees are to be trimmed annually except those which are over 25’ (twenty-five feet) tall, which are trimmed every two (2) years. Eucalyptus trees over 25’ (twenty-five feet) tall must be trimmed annually. Tree less than 25’ (twenty-five feet) are to be trimmed a minimum of once a year. Trees in the City parks and medians must be trimmed between the months of October and January. 5. Can you provide us with locations of most recently pruned trees? Is the pruning received in those areas to the standard expected on this contract/going forward? Recent trimming locations: Community Center Valley Park Edith Rodaway Friendship Park Sea View Parkette Fort Lots Of Fun Park Moon Dust Park Page 997 of 1126 Greenwood Park Bicentennial Park Scout Parkette Ardmore Park 4th and Ardmore 3rd and Prospect Proposal should be focused on current scope of work on RFP not previous contract. Page 998 of 1126 -1- Landscape Maintenance Services REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES RFP No. 22-005 Contract No. PW-MSA 22-003 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Key Information Submit Written Questions By: 5:00PM on THURSDAY, APRIL 28, 2022 Proposals Due: 2:00PM on WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 2022 Page 999 of 1126 -2- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS City of Hermosa Beach REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Notice is hereby given that the City of Hermosa Beach will receive sealed proposals at the Office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, until 2 P.M. on Wednesday, MAY 11, 2022, for LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES. Contractor shall perform all work necessary to complete the agreement in a manner satisfactory to the Public Works Director or his/her designee. The work to be done under these specifications shall include the furnishing of all labor, material, equipment, tools, disposal site or disposal transfer station expense and any other incidental expense necessary to perform Landscape Maintenance Services for the City of Hermosa Beach. The areas to be maintained shall include turf areas, ground cover areas, trees and shrubs in parks, medians, and the downtown area. The duration of the contract is four (4) years from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2026. The successful proposer should be prepared with both equipment and man-power to commence July 1, 2022. All proposals must be submitted in writing, on standard forms found in the Contractual Services’ Contract Documents and Specifications book. All proposals must be sealed and must be plainly marked in the lower left-hand corner “LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES.” The successful proposer will also be required to pay the State of California prevailing wage scale as determined by the Department of Industrial Relations, available at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/dlsePublicWorks.html. The Contractor must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations at the time of proposal. Contractor’s registration available at: https://efiling.dir.ca.gov/PWCR/ActionServlet?action=displayPW CRegistrationForm Each Proposer shall possess a valid State of California Contractors License Class “A” OR both C-27 Landscaping issued by the California State License Board. The successful Contractor must also possess a current City business license. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposal and to waive any informality or irregularity in any proposal received and to be the sole judge of the merits of the respective proposals received. The award, if made, will be made to the most qualified proposer. Plans and Specifications will be available for review at City Hall. The Request for Proposals documents must be downloaded from the City’s website, under the City Departments Tab, select City Clerk from the pull down menu – Bids and Proposals at https://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/51313/portal-home. To be considered as a responsive proposer you must email the Public Works Superintendent Page 1000 of 1126 -3- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS listed on the Request for Proposals to confirm you downloaded the Plans, Specifications, and Construction Documents from the City website. This action will add your company name to the Plan holder list. All questions regarding this proposal must be submitted in writing no later than 5:00 p.m., THURSDAY, APRIL 28, 2022, to Gloria Ledezma, Administrative Assistant, at gledezma@hermosabeach.gov. Susan Morrow Interim City Clerk END NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS Page 1001 of 1126 -4- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES RFP No. 22-005 Contract No. PW-MSA 22-003 I. GENERAL The (“City”) is requesting proposals from qualified firms 1 (“Proposers”) for maintenance services as further described herein (“Services”). All Proposers shall be properly licensed for the performance of the Services in accordance with California law. II. SCOPE OF SERVICES/MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT The Proposer selected to provide the Services shall be retained under the City’s Maintenance Services Agreement (“Agreement”), included as part of these Contract Documents. The City will not consider alterations to the Agreement. This Agreement will be for a period of four years from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2026, with option to extend for one-year at City’s discretion based on Contractor’s performance. The successful proposer should be prepared with both equipment and man-power to commence on July 1, 2022. Contractor shall perform all work necessary to complete the agreement in a manner satisfactory to the Public Works Director or his/her designee. The work to be done under these specifications shall include the furnishing of all labor, material, equipment, tools, disposal site or disposal transfer station expense and any other incidental expense necessary to perform Landscape Maintenance Services for the City of Hermosa Beach. The areas to be maintained shall include turf areas, ground cover areas, trees and shrubs in parks, medians, and the downtown area. The Services sought are set forth in more detail in Exhibit “A” to the Agreement. Notwithstanding the inclusion of such Services in Exhibit “A”, the final scope of services negotiated between City and the successful Proposer shall be set forth in the Agreement executed by and between City and the successful Proposer. III. PUBLIC WORKS PREVAILING WAGE AND CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION Certain labor categories under this project may be subject to prevailing wages as identified in the State of California Labor Code commencing at sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq. If applicable, employees working in these categories at the site must be paid not less than the basic hourly rates of pay and fringe benefits established by the California Department of Industrial Relations. Copies of the State of California wage 1Use of the term “firm” shall mean individual proprietorship, partnership, Limited Liability Company, corporation, or joint venture. Page 1002 of 1126 -5- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS schedules are available for review at www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/. In addition, a copy of the prevailing rate of per diem wages will be made available at the City’s Public Work’s Department upon request. The successful proposer shall post a copy of the prevailing wage rates at each job site. It shall be mandatory upon the Proposer to whom the Contract is awarded, and upon any subcontractors, to comply with all Labor Code provisions, which include but are not limited to the payment of not less than the said specified prevailing wage rates to all workers employed by them in the execution of the Contract, employment of apprentices, hours of labor and debarment of contractors and subcontractors. City Contact The principal contact for the City will be Gloria Ledezma, Administrative Assistant (at (310) 318-0222 or gledezma@hermosabeach.gov), or a designated representative, who will coordinate the assistance to be provided by the City to the Proposer. IV. REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION All questions, requests for interpretations or clarifications, either administrative or technical must be requested in writing and directed to the City Contact, identified above. All written questions, if answered, will be answered in writing, conveyed to all interested firms, and posted on the City’s website. Oral statements by any persons should be considered unverified information unless confirmed in writing. To ensure a response, questions must be received in writing by 5:00 p.m. local time on the date identified in the Key Information. V. CONTENT AND FORMAT OF PROPOSAL Qualifying proposals must address all of the following points, in the following order: 1. Cover Letter. This letter must be signed, by a member of the Proposer with the authority to commit to a contract on behalf of the Proposer, if applicable, offering the proposal. 2. Services Approach and Scope of Services. Describe how the maintenance services will be planned and controlled. Describe the work plan to be utilized to complete the tasks listed in the Scope of Services. Note any changes or additions to the work descriptions that may have been overlooked or which help clarify the work tasks. 3. Responsible Personnel. List the principal-in-charge and others who will be directly involved with the provision of Services. Provide a concise statement of qualifications, relevant experience and licensure of each person who will contribute to the performance of the Services. List the estimated amount of time each person will contribute in the performance of Services. Include an organizational chart of key personnel involved. Page 1003 of 1126 -6- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS 4. Related Experience. On the forms located in the Proposal Submission Forms list at least three (3) jobs under which the proposer has performed maintenance services for a public entity during the past five (5) years. List shall identify the following information for each project: • Description of services. • Contract amount and length of contract term. • Public entity’s name, telephone number and contact person. 5. Contractor’s Industrial Safety Record. The information must include all work undertaken in the State of California by the proposer, partnership, joint venture, or corporation that any principal of the proposer participated in as a principal or owner for the last five calendar years and the current calendar year prior to the date of proposal submittal. Separate information shall be submitted for each particular partnership, joint venture, and corporate or individual proposer. The proposer may attach any additional information or explanation of data, which he/she would like taken into consideration in evaluating the safety record. An explanation must be attached of the circumstances surrounding any and all fatalities. 6. Firm Description and Financial Information. If applicable, provide relevant information regarding the firm and its organizational stability and strength. This includes a statement of organizational ownership (e.g., sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, joint venture, etc.), information regarding the make-up of the organizational structure (e.g., owner, partners, board of directors, joint venture partners, etc.). 7. Hourly Rates for Various Services. List the hourly rates of various services that the Contractor may be able to provide. The proposal package must also include the following on the forms located in the Proposal Submission Forms: 8. Cost Proposal 9. Proposal Affirmation. FAILURE TO PROPOSE ON ALL ITEMS OR SUBMITTING AN INCOMPLETE PROPOSAL PACKAGE MAY RESULT IN THE PROPOSAL BEING REJECTED AS NON-RESPONSIVE. VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA Responses will be evaluated based on the background, financial capacity, qualifications, services offered and the cost proposal submitted by the respondent. The contract, if awarded, shall be to the most qualified Proposer, which submits the proposal that, in the sole judgment of City, is in the best interest of the City. Upon selection of a Proposer, the City will endeavor to negotiate a mutually agreeable agreement with the selected Proposer. In the event that the City is unable to reach Page 1004 of 1126 -7- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS agreement, the City will proceed, at its sole discretion, to negotiate with the next Proposer selected by the City. The City reserves the right to contract for Services in the manner that most benefits the City including awarding more than one contract if desired. After negotiating a proposed Agreement that is fair and reasonable, City staff will make the final recommendation to the City Council concerning the proposed Agreement. The City Council has the final authority to approve or reject the Agreement. VII. SITE EXAMINATION Proposers should became familiar with all the locations covered in this contract. There is no mandatory walk. Proposer shall examine the site and become acquainted with all conditions affecting the work. In submitting a Proposal, Proposers warrant that they have made such site examination as they deem necessary to determine the condition of the site, its accessibility to materials, workmen and equipment, and to determine the proposer’s ability to protect existing surface and subsurface improvements. Proposers shall also familiarize themselves with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and codes affecting the performance of the work; make such investigations, as it may deem necessary for performance of the Services at its proposal price within the terms of the Agreement; and correlate its observations, investigations, and determinations with the requirements of the Agreement. No claim for allowances–time or money–will be allowed as to such matters. VIII. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS The proposal must be received no later than 2 P.M. local time, on or before Wednesday, May 11, 2022, at the office of the: Office of the City Clerk, City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 The envelope or subject line should clearly indicate "Proposal for Landscape Maintenance Services " and Proposer's name and address shall appear in the upper left-hand corner of the envelope. If more than one envelope is required, each envelope shall be legibly numbered below the name of the Proposer, e.g., Envelope 1 of 3, as required. The City will not be responsible for proposals that are delinquent, lost, incorrectly marked, sent to an address other than that given herein, or sent by mail or courier service and not signed for by the City. IX. ADDENDA The City reserves the right to revise the Contract Documents prior to the time set to receive proposals. Revisions, if any, shall be made by written Addendum. Any Addendum issued by the City shall be included in the proposal and made part of the Contract Documents. Each Proposer shall leave with the City its name, address, phone Page 1005 of 1126 -8- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS and fax numbers, and e-mail address for the purpose of receiving notification of Addendum. Addendum will be published on the City’s website. Proposers are responsible for ensuring that they have received any and all Addendum. Each Proposer should contact the City to verify that it has received all Addendum issued, if any, prior to the proposal opening. Failure to acknowledge receipt of all Addendum may result in proposal rejection. X. GENERAL CONDITIONS A. Amendments to Proposals Unless specifically requested by the City, no amendment, addendum or modification will be accepted after a proposal has been submitted to City. If a change to a proposal that has been submitted is desired, the submitted proposal must be withdrawn, and the replacement proposal must be submitted prior to the deadline stated herein for receiving proposals. B. Non-Responsive Proposals A proposal may be considered non-responsive if conditional, incomplete, or if it contains alterations of form, additions not called for, or other irregularities that may constitute a material change to the proposal. C. Costs for Preparing The City will not compensate any Proposer for the cost of preparing any proposal, and all materials submitted with a proposal shall become the property of the City. The City will retain all proposals submitted and may use any idea in a proposal regardless of whether that proposal is selected. D. Cancellation City reserves the right to cancel this request for proposals at any time prior to contract award without obligation in any manner for proposal preparation, interview, fee negotiation or other associated marketing costs. E. Price Validity Prices provided by Proposers are valid for 90 days from the proposal due date. The City intends to award the contract within this time but may request an extension from the Proposers to hold pricing, until negotiations are complete and the contract is awarded. F. No Commitment to Award Issuance of request for proposals and receipt of proposals does not commit the City to award a contract. City expressly reserves the right to postpone the proposal for its own convenience, to accept or reject any or all proposals received, to negotiate with more than one Proposer concurrently, or to cancel all or part of this request for proposals. Page 1006 of 1126 -9- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS G. Right to Negotiate and/or Reject Proposals City reserves the right to negotiate any price or provision, task order or service, accept any part or all of any proposals, waive any irregularities, and to reject any and all, or parts of any and all proposals, whenever, in the sole opinion of City, such action shall serve its best interests and those of the tax-paying public. H. Non-Discrimination The City does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, age, ancestry, medical condition, disability or gender in consideration for an award of contract. XI. INSURANCE, LIABILITY, SAFETY, AND EMERGENCY REQUIREMENTS Liability Insurance The Contractor needs to name in their Liability Insurance the “Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District” as additional insured. The Contractor shall, at its expense, maintain in effect all times during the performance of work under the Contract not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers licensed to sell insurance in the State of California and having a “A“or higher rating in the latest edition of Best’s Insurance Guide, and shall be subject to approval by the City’s Risk Manager: Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability • Workers’ Compensation – coverage as required by law • Employer’s Liability – limits of at least $100,000 per occurrence Comprehensive General Liability • Combined Single Limit - $2,000,000 Automobile Liability • Combined Single Limit - $1,000,000 The automobile and general comprehensive liability policies may be combined in a single policy with a combined single limit of $1,000,000. All of the Contractor’s policies shall contain an endorsement providing written notice shall be given to the City at least 30 calendar days prior to termination, cancellation or reduction of coverage in the policy Page 1007 of 1126 -10- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS The Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability policies shall contain the following: 1. An endorsement extending coverage to the City as an insured, in the same manner as the named insured as respects liabilities arising out of the performance of any work under the Contract. Such insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the interest of the City, and any other insurance maintained by the City shall be excess and not contributing insurance with the insurance required hereunder. 2. “Severability of Interest” clause. 3. Elimination of any exclusion regarding loss or damage to property caused by explosion or resulting from collapse of buildings or structures or damage to property underground, commonly referred to by insurers as the “XCU” hazards. 4. Provision or endorsement stating that such insurance, subject to all of its other terms and conditions, applies to the liability assumed by the Contractor under the Contract. Promptly on execution of the Contract, and prior to commencement of any work, the Contractor shall deliver to the City copies of all required policies and endorsements thereto on the forms supplied by the City. The Contractor shall require and verify similar insurance on the part of its Subcontractors. The foregoing requirements as to the types, limits, and City approval of insurance coverage to be maintained by the Contractor are not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligation assumed by the Contractor under the Contract. Any policy or policies of insurance that the Contractor or his Subcontractors elects to carry as insurance against loss or damage to their construction equipment and tools or other personal property used in fulfillment of this contract shall include a provision waiving the insurer’s right of subrogation against the City. The cost of all insurance shall be included in the contractor’s proposal. Instructions for completing the required endorsements and forms therefore are attached to these Special Provisions as Exhibits A-F. Safety The following is in addition to the provisions of Section 5-7: Emergency Provisions Page 1008 of 1126 -11- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS Unusual conditions may arise on the work which will require that immediate and unusual provision be made to protect the public from danger or loss or damage to life and property, due directly or indirectly to the prosecution of the work, and it is part of the service required of the Contractor to make such provisions and to furnish such protection. Whenever, in the opinion of the City, an emergency exists of which the City is aware and against which the Contractor has not taken sufficient precaution for the safety of the public or the protection of utilities or of adjacent structures or property which may be injured by the progress of construction; and whenever, in the opinion of the City, immediate action shall be considered necessary in order to protect public or private personnel or property interests, or prevent likely loss of human life or damage on account of the operations under the Contract, then in that event the City may provide suitable protection to said interests by causing such work to be done and material to be furnished, as in the opinion of the City may seem reasonable and necessary, all at the expense of the Contractor. END INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS Page 1009 of 1126 -12- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES RFP No. 22-005 Contract No. PW-MSA 22-003 COST PROPOSAL TO: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (“CITY”) DATE: ________________________________________________________________ PROPOSER: ______________________________________________ (“CONTRACTOR”) The undersigned declares that they have carefully examined the Contract Documents and Addendums No.(s)_______________ and that they are thoroughly familiar with the contents thereof, and is authorized to represent the respective firm and propose services to City of Hermosa Beach. It is understood that the price shown hereon includes all maintenance services described in the Contract Documents and shall be inclusive of all costs for the Proposer to accomplish the work. The costs of any work shown or required in the Contract Documents, but not specifically identified as a Contract Pay Item are included in the Contract Pay Items, and no additional compensation shall be due Contractor by virtue of Contractor's compliance with the Contract Documents. In accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the Engineer and in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Unified Building Code for Construction (current edition) (except Sections 1-9), and the requirements of the Engineer under said documents, for the prices shown herein. For each item, the averaged one-month maintenance cost shall be indicated and the total of these costs shall be extended for the term of the Agreement. Proposer must provide costs for all items below. Page 1010 of 1126 -13- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS 1st Fiscal Year July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKETTES Item No. Park Name and Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 1 Ardmore Park 491 Ardmore Avenue $ $ 2 Bi-Centennial Park 550 4th Street $ $ 3 Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue $ $ 4 Fort Lots-of-Fun 1102 6th Street $ $ 5 Greenwood Park 1102 Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 6 Greenbelt/Trail Valley Drive $ $ 7 Kay Etow Parkette Monterey Boulevard and Lyndon Street $ $ 8 Lawn Bowling Green 861 Valley Drive $ $ 9 Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street $ $ 10 Noble Park 1400 The Strand $ $ 11 Ocean View Parkette 857 3rd Street $ $ 12 Sand Hill Parkette Palm Drive and Loma Walk $ $ 13 Scout Park 1402 Prospect Avenue $ $ 14 Sea View Parkette 1870 Prospect Avenue $ $ 15 Shaffer Parkette 3231 Ingleside Drive $ $ 16 South Park 425 Valley Park $ $ 17 Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive $ $ Total: $ $ Page 1011 of 1126 -14- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF CITY FACILITIES Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 18 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive $ $ 19 City Storage 1110 6th Street $ $ 20 City Yard 555 6th Street $ $ 21 Clark Building 861 Valley Drive $ $ 22 Community Center 710 Pier Avenue $ $ 23 Community Services Building 1035 Valley Drive $ $ 24 Hermosa Beach Library 550 Pier Avenue $ $ 25 Hermosa Beach Fire Station 540 Pier Avenue $ $ 26 Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue $ $ Total $ $ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF MEDIANS, PLANTERS AND PARKWAYS Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 27 MEDIANS – 35th Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 28 MEDIANS – Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue $ $ 29 MEDIANS – Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street to 35th Street $ $ 30 MEDIANS – Herondo Street, from Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue $ $ 31 MEDIANS – Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue $ $ 32 MEDIANS – Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive (Planters have tree grates requiring litter removal.) $ $ 33 PLANTERS – 2ND Street and the Strand $ $ 34 PLANTERS – 8th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ Page 1012 of 1126 -15- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS 35 PLANTERS – 10th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 36 PLANTERS – Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 37 PLANTERS – Alley behind Longfellow Avenue and 30th Place. $ $ 38 PLANTERS – 14th Street and Ocean Drive $ $ 39 PLANTERS – 14th Street and East of Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 40 PLANTERS – 15TH Street and The Strand $ $ 41 PLANTERS – 16th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 42 PLANTERS – 18th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 43 PLANTERS – 22nd Street and The Strand $ $ 44 PLANTERS – 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue $ $ 45 PLANTERS – 28th Street and Valley Drive $ $ 46 PLANTERS – 29TH Street and Valley Drive $ $ 47 PLANTERS – Shakespeare, from 33rd Place to The Strand $ $ 48 PLANTERS – 35th Street, from The Strand to Boundary Place $ $ 50 PLANTERS – Parking Structure – south side only $ $ 51 PLANTERS – Parking Lot A $ $ 52 PLANTERS – All Beach Restrooms Area Planters on 2nd Street, 14th Street, and 22nd Street $ $ 53 PLANTERS – Parking Lot D (14th Street and Manhattan Avenue) $ $ 54 PLANTERS – 13TH Court and Pier Avenue (in the corridor leading to Loreto Plaza) $ $ 55 PLANTERS – 1201 The Strand (Schumacher Plaza) $ $ 56 PARKWAY – Gould Avenue and Gould Terrace $ $ 57 PARKWAY – 3rd Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ 58 PARKWAY – 4th Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ Total $ $ Page 1013 of 1126 -16- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS BALL FIELD MAINTENANCE AT CLARK FIELD Item No. Description Cost per Field Total Monthly Cost Annual Cost 60 1 Soccer Field $ $ $ 61 3 Baseball Fields $ $ $ Total $ $ MAINTENANCE OF TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS, PICKLEBALL COURTS, AND SKATE PARK Item No. Description Cost per Field Monthly Cost Annual Cost 61 Tennis Courts (7 Total) $ $ $ 62 Pickleball Courts (4 total) $ $ $ 63 Basketball Courts (3 Total) $ $ $ 65 Skate Park $ $ Total $ $ PLACEMENT OF WOOD CHIPS Item No. Description Estimated Quantity Per Year Unit Price Total Cost 66 Greenbelt 1,000 Cubic Yards $ $ 67 South Park 40 Cubic Yards $ $ Total $ $ Page 1014 of 1126 -17- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS TREE REMOVAL Item No. Description Cost Per Tree 73 Removal of Trees Less Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ 74 Removal of Trees More Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ Total $ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN FIGURES $ _____________________________________________ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN WORDS _______________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ In the event of a conflict between the numbers give in figures and in words, the words shall control. TREE MAINTENANCE Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 68 Trimming of Trees Over 25 Feet – Every Two Years $ $ 69 Trimming of Eucalyptus Trees Over 25 Feet - Annual $ $ 70 Trimming of Trees Under 25 Feet – Once a Year and as Needed $ $ 71 Maintenance of City Parkway Trees $ $ 72 Maintenance of Park Trees $ $ Total $ $ Page 1015 of 1126 -18- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS 2nd Fiscal Year July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKETTES Item No. Park Name and Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 1 Ardmore Park 491 Ardmore Avenue $ $ 2 Bi-Centennial Park 550 4th Street $ $ 3 Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue $ $ 4 Fort Lots-of-Fun 1102 6th Street $ $ 5 Greenwood Park 1102 Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 6 Greenbelt/Trail Valley Drive $ $ 7 Kay Etow Parkette Monterey Boulevard and Lyndon Street $ $ 8 Lawn Bowling Green 861 Valley Drive $ $ 9 Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street $ $ 10 Noble Park 1400 The Strand $ $ 11 Ocean View Parkette 857 3rd Street $ $ 12 Sand Hill Parkette Palm Drive and Loma Walk $ $ 13 Scout Park 1402 Prospect Avenue $ $ 14 Sea View Parkette 1870 Prospect Avenue $ $ 15 Shaffer Parkette 3231 Ingleside Drive $ $ 16 South Park 425 Valley Park $ $ 17 Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive $ $ Total: $ $ Page 1016 of 1126 -19- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF CITY FACILITIES Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 18 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive $ $ 19 City Storage 1110 6th Street $ $ 20 City Yard 555 6th Street $ $ 21 Clark Building 861 Valley Drive $ $ 22 Community Center 710 Pier Avenue $ $ 23 Community Services Building 1035 Valley Drive $ $ 24 Hermosa Beach Library 550 Pier Avenue $ $ 25 Hermosa Beach Fire Station 540 Pier Avenue $ $ 26 Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue $ $ Total $ $ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF MEDIANS, PLANTERS AND PARKWAYS Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 27 MEDIANS – 35th Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 28 MEDIANS – Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue $ $ 29 MEDIANS – Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street to 35th Street $ $ 30 MEDIANS – Herondo Street, from Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue $ $ 31 MEDIANS – Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue $ $ 32 MEDIANS – Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive (Planters have tree grates requiring litter removal.) $ $ 33 PLANTERS – 2ND Street and the Strand $ $ 34 PLANTERS – 8th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 35 PLANTERS – 10th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ Page 1017 of 1126 -20- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS 36 PLANTERS – Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 37 PLANTERS – Alley behind Longfellow Avenue and 30th Place. $ $ 38 PLANTERS – 14th Street and Ocean Drive $ $ 39 PLANTERS – 14th Street and East of Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 40 PLANTERS – 15TH Street and The Strand $ $ 41 PLANTERS – 16th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 42 PLANTERS – 18th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 43 PLANTERS – 22nd Street and The Strand $ $ 44 PLANTERS – 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue $ $ 45 PLANTERS – 28th Street and Valley Drive $ $ 46 PLANTERS – 29TH Street and Valley Drive $ $ 47 PLANTERS – Shakespeare, from 33rd Place to The Strand $ $ 48 PLANTERS – 35th Street, from The Strand to Boundary Place $ $ 50 PLANTERS – Parking Structure – south side only $ $ 51 PLANTERS – Parking Lot A $ $ 52 PLANTERS – All Beach Restrooms Area Planters on 2nd Street, 14th Street, and 22nd Street $ $ 53 PLANTERS – Parking Lot D (14th Street and Manhattan Avenue) $ $ 54 PLANTERS – 13TH Court and Pier Avenue (in the corridor leading to Loreto Plaza) $ $ 55 PLANTERS – 1201 The Strand (Schumacher Plaza) $ $ 56 PARKWAY – Gould Avenue and Gould Terrace $ $ 57 PARKWAY – 3rd Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ 58 PARKWAY – 4th Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ Total $ $ BALL FIELD MAINTENANCE AT CLARK FIELD Item No. Description Cost per Field Total Monthly Cost Annual Cost Page 1018 of 1126 -21- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS 60 1 Soccer Field $ $ $ 61 3 Baseball Fields $ $ $ Total $ $ MAINTENANCE OF TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS, PICKLEBALL COURTS, AND SKATE PARK Item No. Description Cost per Field Monthly Cost Annual Cost 61 Tennis Courts (7 Total) $ $ $ 62 Pickleball Courts (4 total) $ $ $ 63 Basketball Courts (3 Total) $ $ $ 65 Skate Park $ $ Total $ $ PLACEMENT OF WOOD CHIPS Item No. Description Estimated Quantity Per Year Unit Price Total Cost 66 Greenbelt 1,000 Cubic Yards $ $ 67 South Park 40 Cubic Yards $ $ Total $ $ TREE MAINTENANCE Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 68 Trimming of Trees Over 25 Feet – Every Two Years $ $ 69 Trimming of Eucalyptus Trees Over 25 Feet - Annual $ $ 70 Trimming of Trees Under 25 Feet – Once a Year and as Needed $ $ Page 1019 of 1126 -22- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS TREE REMOVAL Item No. Description Cost Per Tree 73 Removal of Trees Less Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ 74 Removal of Trees More Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ Total $ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN FIGURES $ _____________________________________________ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN WORDS _______________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ In the event of a conflict between the numbers give in figures and in words, the words shall control. 71 Maintenance of City Parkway Trees $ $ 72 Maintenance of Park Trees $ $ Total $ $ Page 1020 of 1126 -23- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS 3rd Fiscal Year July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKETTES Item No. Park Name and Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 1 Ardmore Park 491 Ardmore Avenue $ $ 2 Bi-Centennial Park 550 4th Street $ $ 3 Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue $ $ 4 Fort Lots-of-Fun 1102 6th Street $ $ 5 Greenwood Park 1102 Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 6 Greenbelt/Trail Valley Drive $ $ 7 Kay Etow Parkette Monterey Boulevard and Lyndon Street $ $ 8 Lawn Bowling Green 861 Valley Drive $ $ 9 Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street $ $ 10 Noble Park 1400 The Strand $ $ 11 Ocean View Parkette 857 3rd Street $ $ 12 Sand Hill Parkette Palm Drive and Loma Walk $ $ 13 Scout Park 1402 Prospect Avenue $ $ 14 Sea View Parkette 1870 Prospect Avenue $ $ 15 Shaffer Parkette 3231 Ingleside Drive $ $ 16 South Park 425 Valley Park $ $ 17 Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive $ $ Total: $ $ Page 1021 of 1126 -24- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF CITY FACILITIES Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 18 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive $ $ 19 City Storage 1110 6th Street $ $ 20 City Yard 555 6th Street $ $ 21 Clark Building 861 Valley Drive $ $ 22 Community Center 710 Pier Avenue $ $ 23 Community Services Building 1035 Valley Drive $ $ 24 Hermosa Beach Library 550 Pier Avenue $ $ 25 Hermosa Beach Fire Station 540 Pier Avenue $ $ 26 Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue $ $ Total $ $ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF MEDIANS, PLANTERS AND PARKWAYS Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 27 MEDIANS – 35th Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 28 MEDIANS – Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue $ $ 29 MEDIANS – Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street to 35th Street $ $ 30 MEDIANS – Herondo Street, from Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue $ $ 31 MEDIANS – Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue $ $ 32 MEDIANS – Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive (Planters have tree grates requiring litter removal.) $ $ 33 PLANTERS – 2ND Street and the Strand $ $ 34 PLANTERS – 8th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ Page 1022 of 1126 -25- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS 35 PLANTERS – 10th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 36 PLANTERS – Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 37 PLANTERS – Alley behind Longfellow Avenue and 30th Place. $ $ 38 PLANTERS – 14th Street and Ocean Drive $ $ 39 PLANTERS – 14th Street and East of Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 40 PLANTERS – 15TH Street and The Strand $ $ 41 PLANTERS – 16th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 42 PLANTERS – 18th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 43 PLANTERS – 22nd Street and The Strand $ $ 44 PLANTERS – 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue $ $ 45 PLANTERS – 28th Street and Valley Drive $ $ 46 PLANTERS – 29TH Street and Valley Drive $ $ 47 PLANTERS – Shakespeare, from 33rd Place to The Strand $ $ 48 PLANTERS – 35th Street, from The Strand to Boundary Place $ $ 50 PLANTERS – Parking Structure – south side only $ $ 51 PLANTERS – Parking Lot A $ $ 52 PLANTERS – All Beach Restrooms Area Planters on 2nd Street, 14th Street, and 22nd Street $ $ 53 PLANTERS – Parking Lot D (14th Street and Manhattan Avenue) $ $ 54 PLANTERS – 13TH Court and Pier Avenue (in the corridor leading to Loreto Plaza) $ $ 55 PLANTERS – 1201 The Strand (Schumacher Plaza) $ $ 56 PARKWAY – Gould Avenue and Gould Terrace $ $ 57 PARKWAY – 3rd Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ 58 PARKWAY – 4th Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ Total $ $ Page 1023 of 1126 -26- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS BALL FIELD MAINTENANCE AT CLARK FIELD Item No. Description Cost per Field Total Monthly Cost Annual Cost 60 1 Soccer Field $ $ $ 61 3 Baseball Fields $ $ $ Total $ $ MAINTENANCE OF TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS, PICKLEBALL COURTS, AND SKATE PARK Item No. Description Cost per Field Monthly Cost Annual Cost 61 Tennis Courts (7 Total) $ $ $ 62 Pickleball Courts (4 total) $ $ $ 63 Basketball Courts (3 Total) $ $ $ 65 Skate Park $ $ Total $ $ PLACEMENT OF WOOD CHIPS Item No. Description Estimated Quantity Per Year Unit Price Total Cost 66 Greenbelt 1,000 Cubic Yards $ $ 67 South Park 40 Cubic Yards $ $ Total $ $ Page 1024 of 1126 -27- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS TREE REMOVAL Item No. Description Cost Per Tree 73 Removal of Trees Less Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ 74 Removal of Trees More Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ Total $ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN FIGURES $ _____________________________________________ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN WORDS _______________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ In the event of a conflict between the numbers give in figures and in words, the words shall control. TREE MAINTENANCE Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 68 Trimming of Trees Over 25 Feet – Every Two Years $ $ 69 Trimming of Eucalyptus Trees Over 25 Feet - Annual $ $ 70 Trimming of Trees Under 25 Feet – Once a Year and as Needed $ $ 71 Maintenance of City Parkway Trees $ $ 72 Maintenance of Park Trees $ $ Total $ $ Page 1025 of 1126 -28- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS 4th Fiscal Year July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKETTES Item No. Park Name and Location Monthly Cost Annual Cost 1 Ardmore Park 491 Ardmore Avenue $ $ 2 Bi-Centennial Park 550 4th Street $ $ 3 Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue $ $ 4 Fort Lots-of-Fun 1102 6th Street $ $ 5 Greenwood Park 1102 Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 6 Greenbelt/Trail Valley Drive $ $ 7 Kay Etow Parkette Monterey Boulevard and Lyndon Street $ $ 8 Lawn Bowling Green 861 Valley Drive $ $ 9 Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street $ $ 10 Noble Park 1400 The Strand $ $ 11 Ocean View Parkette 857 3rd Street $ $ 12 Sand Hill Parkette Palm Drive and Loma Walk $ $ 13 Scout Park 1402 Prospect Avenue $ $ 14 Sea View Parkette 1870 Prospect Avenue $ $ 15 Shaffer Parkette 3231 Ingleside Drive $ $ 16 South Park 425 Valley Park $ $ 17 Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive $ $ Total: $ $ Page 1026 of 1126 -29- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF CITY FACILITIES Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 18 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive $ $ 19 City Storage 1110 6th Street $ $ 20 City Yard 555 6th Street $ $ 21 Clark Building 861 Valley Drive $ $ 22 Community Center 710 Pier Avenue $ $ 23 Community Services Building 1035 Valley Drive $ $ 24 Hermosa Beach Library 550 Pier Avenue $ $ 25 Hermosa Beach Fire Station 540 Pier Avenue $ $ 26 Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue $ $ Total $ $ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF MEDIANS, PLANTERS AND PARKWAYS Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 27 MEDIANS – 35th Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 28 MEDIANS – Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue $ $ 29 MEDIANS – Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street to 35th Street $ $ 30 MEDIANS – Herondo Street, from Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue $ $ 31 MEDIANS – Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue $ $ 32 MEDIANS – Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive (Planters have tree grates requiring litter removal.) $ $ 33 PLANTERS – 2ND Street and the Strand $ $ 34 PLANTERS – 8th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ Page 1027 of 1126 -30- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS 35 PLANTERS – 10th Street and Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 36 PLANTERS – Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 37 PLANTERS – Alley behind Longfellow Avenue and 30th Place. $ $ 38 PLANTERS – 14th Street and Ocean Drive $ $ 39 PLANTERS – 14th Street and East of Pacific Coast Highway $ $ 40 PLANTERS – 15TH Street and The Strand $ $ 41 PLANTERS – 16th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 42 PLANTERS – 18th Street Walk Street, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand $ $ 43 PLANTERS – 22nd Street and The Strand $ $ 44 PLANTERS – 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue $ $ 45 PLANTERS – 28th Street and Valley Drive $ $ 46 PLANTERS – 29TH Street and Valley Drive $ $ 47 PLANTERS – Shakespeare, from 33rd Place to The Strand $ $ 48 PLANTERS – 35th Street, from The Strand to Boundary Place $ $ 50 PLANTERS – Parking Structure – south side only $ $ 51 PLANTERS – Parking Lot A $ $ 52 PLANTERS – All Beach Restrooms Area Planters on 2nd Street, 14th Street, and 22nd Street $ $ 53 PLANTERS – Parking Lot D (14th Street and Manhattan Avenue) $ $ 54 PLANTERS – 13TH Court and Pier Avenue (in the corridor leading to Loreto Plaza) $ $ 55 PLANTERS – 1201 The Strand (Schumacher Plaza) $ $ 56 PARKWAY – Gould Avenue and Gould Terrace $ $ 57 PARKWAY – 3rd Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ 58 PARKWAY – 4th Street and Prospect Avenue $ $ Total $ $ Page 1028 of 1126 -31- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS BALL FIELD MAINTENANCE AT CLARK FIELD Item No. Description Cost per Field Total Monthly Cost Annual Cost 60 1 Soccer Field $ $ $ 61 3 Baseball Fields $ $ $ Total $ $ MAINTENANCE OF TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS, PICKLEBALL COURTS, AND SKATE PARK Item No. Description Cost per Field Monthly Cost Annual Cost 61 Tennis Courts (7 Total) $ $ $ 62 Pickleball Courts (4 total) $ $ $ 63 Basketball Courts (3 Total) $ $ $ 65 Skate Park $ $ Total $ $ PLACEMENT OF WOOD CHIPS Item No. Description Estimated Quantity Per Year Unit Price Total Cost 66 Greenbelt 1,000 Cubic Yards $ $ 67 South Park 40 Cubic Yards $ $ Total $ $ Page 1029 of 1126 -32- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS TREE REMOVAL Item No. Description Cost Per Tree 73 Removal of Trees Less Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ 74 Removal of Trees More Than 25’ (twenty-five feet) $ Total $ TOTAL AMOUNT IN FIGURES $ ___________________________________________________ TOTAL AMOUNT PROPOSAL IN WORDS ___________________________________________ In the event of a conflict between the numbers give in figures and in words, the words shall control. IN WITNESS WHEREOF CONTRACTOR executed this proposal as of date set forth: Signature of Proposer: _______________________________ Signer’s Name: ______________________________________ Company Name:______________________________ Date:_______________________________________ TREE MAINTENANCE Item No. Description Monthly Cost Annual Cost 68 Trimming of Trees Over 25 Feet – Every Two Years $ $ 69 Trimming of Eucalyptus Trees Over 25 Feet - Annual $ $ 70 Trimming of Trees Under 25 Feet – Once a Year and as Needed $ $ 71 Maintenance of City Parkway Trees $ $ 72 Maintenance of Park Trees $ $ Total $ $ Page 1030 of 1126 -33- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES RFP No. 22-005 Contract No. PW-MSA 22-003 PROPOSAL AFFIRMATION With regard to the information provided hereinabove, I affirm that: • All information provided is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and; • I understand that a materially false statement willfully or fraudulently made in connection with this Proposal may result in the termination of any contract between the City of Hermosa Beach and _________________________________________, and as a further result, the aforesaid firm may be barred from participation in future City contracts as well as be subject to possible criminal prosecution, and; • I have legal authority to bind ___________________________________________ to the terms of this affirmation. FOR PROPOSAL TO BE VALID, THIS SHEET MUST BE SIGNED _____________________________________________________ Signature Date _____________________________________________________ Printed Name _____________________________________________________ Title _____________________________________________________ Company Name Page 1031 of 1126 -34- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES RFP No. 22-005 Contract No. PW-MSA 22-003 REFERENCES OF WORK Date: ________________ The following are the names, addresses and phone numbers/ email addresses for three public agencies for which Bidder has performed similar work within the past five years. 1. Name and address of Public Agency – Project Name Name and Telephone No. of Project Manager Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Name and address of Public Agency – Project Name Name and Telephone No. of Project Manager Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Name and address of Public Agency – Project Name Name and Telephone No. of Project Manager Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed For additional References, please add separate sheets END OF PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMS Page 1032 of 1126 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES Page 1 of 17 This Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services (“Agreement”) is made on this ___ day of ____________2022, at Hermosa Beach, California, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corporation, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (hereinafter referred to as the “CITY”) and _________________ (hereinafter referred to as the “CONTRACTOR”). RECITALS A. CITY proposes to contract for Landscape Maintenance Services as set forth below in this Agreement; B. CONTRACTOR is willing to perform such services and has the necessary qualifications by reason of experience, preparation, and organization to provide the services described in Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY and the CONTRACTOR mutually agree as follows: 1. SERVICES. CONTRACTOR shall perform those services set forth in “Exhibit A” (Request for Proposal Document - Landscape Maintenance Services) which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. By executing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR represents that it has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. 2. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of CONTRACTOR are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from CITY and shall be completed within the time period designated by CITY. The term of this Agreement shall be for the time period beginning ___________, 2022 and ending on ______________unless extended in writing in advance by the CITY. 3. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES. CONTRACTOR shall be compensated in an amount not to exceed those amounts as listed on pages P-___ through P- ___ of Attachment 1. Compensation shall under no circumstances be increased except by written amendment of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be paid within thirty (30) days of presentation of an Page 1033 of 1126 Page 2 of 17 invoice to CITY for services performed to CITY’s satisfaction. CONTRACTOR shall submit invoices monthly describing the services performed, the date services were performed, a description of reimbursable costs, and any other information requested by CITY. 4. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. 4.1. CITY’s Representative. Unless otherwise designated in writing ___________________, Maintenance Supervisor shall serve as the CITY’s representative for the administration of the project. All activities performed by the CONTRACTOR shall be coordinated with this person. 4.2. Manager-in-Charge. For the CONTRACTOR___________ shall be in charge of the project on all matters relating to this Agreement and any agreement or approval made by her/him shall be binding on the CONTRACTOR. The Manager-in-Charge shall not be replaced without the written consent of the CITY. 4.3. Responsibilities of the CITY. The CITY shall provide all relevant documentation in its possession to the CONTRACTOR upon request in order to minimize duplication of efforts. The CITY’s staff shall work with the CONTRACTOR as necessary to facilitate performance of the services. 4.4. Personnel. The CONTRACTOR represents that it has or will secure at its own expense all personnel required to perform the services under this Agreement. All of the services required under this Agreement will be performed by the CONTRACTOR or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be qualified to perform such services. The CONTRACTOR reserves the right to determine the assignment of its own employees to the performance of the CONTRACTOR’s services under this Agreement, but the CITY reserves the right, for good cause, to require the CONTRACTOR to exclude any employee from performing services on the CITY’s premises. 5. TERMINATION. 5.1. Termination for Convenience. Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause and in its sole discretion at any time by giving the other party thirty (30) days' written notice of such termination. In the event of such termination, the CONTRACTOR shall cease services as of the date of termination and shall be Page 1034 of 1126 Page 3 of 17 compensated for services performed to the CITY's satisfaction up to the date of termination. 5.2. Termination for Cause. All terms, provisions, and specifications of this Agreement are material and binding, and failure to perform any material portion of the work described herein shall be considered a breach of this Agreement. Should the Agreement be breached in any manner, the CITY may, at its option, terminate the Agreement not less than five (5) days after written notification is received by the CONTRACTOR to remedy the violation within the stated time or within any other time period agreed to by the parties. In the event of such termination, the CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any additional costs incurred by the CITY in securing the services from another contractor. 6. INDEMNIFICATION. 6.1. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by CITY, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, and cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with CONTRACTOR's performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT, regardless of CITY’S passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage which is caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY. Should CITY in its sole discretion find CONTRACTOR’S legal counsel unacceptable, then CONTRACTOR shall reimburse the CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. The CONTRACTOR shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement. 6.2. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONTRACTOR as required by Section 17, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise Page 1035 of 1126 Page 4 of 17 assumed by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification. 7. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. 7.1. The CONTRACTOR, at the CONTRACTOR’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies: 7.1.1. Workers’ Compensation Coverage. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for its employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, the CONTRACTOR shall require any and every subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor’s employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by the CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the CONTRACTOR for City. 7.1.2. General Liability Coverage. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. 7.1.3. Automobile Liability Coverage. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the CONTRACTOR arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than three hundred thousand Page 1036 of 1126 Page 5 of 17 dollars ($300,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. 7.2. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be issued by insurers possessing a Best’s rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the specific language of Section 8.2.1 below. 7.2.1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.” 7.2.2. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the CITY, including any self- insured retention the CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy. 7.2.3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. 7.2.4. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents. 7.2.5. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. 7.2.6. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ written notice has been received by the CITY. 7.3. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Page 1037 of 1126 Page 6 of 17 CITY. At the CITY’s option, the CONTRACTOR shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self- insured retentions. 7.4. Certificates of Insurance. The CONTRACTOR shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to the CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement. 7.5. Failure to Procure Insurance. Failure on the part of the CONTRACTOR to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which the CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 6.2 above. 7.6. Nonpayment of Deductible. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required by this Agreement shall allow City, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the CONTRACTOR (as the named insured) should CONTRACTOR fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. CONTRACTOR understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by CONTRACTOR as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should City pay the SIR or deductible on CONTRACTOR’S behalf upon the CONTRACTOR’S failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, City may include such amounts as damages in any action against CONTRACTOR for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by City due to the breach. 8. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to the CITY for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience, and competence of the CONTRACTOR. Assignments of any or all rights, duties, or obligations of the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall not subcontract Page 1038 of 1126 Page 7 of 17 any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of the CITY. If the CITY consents to such subcontract, the CONTRACTOR shall be fully responsible to the CITY for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the CITY and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the CITY to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, CODES, ORDINANCES, AND REGULATIONS. The CONTRACTOR shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations. 9.1. Taxes. The CONTRACTOR agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against the CITY by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. In the event that the CITY is audited by any Federal or State agency regarding the independent contractor status of the CONTRACTOR and the audit in any way fails to sustain the validity of a wholly independent contractor relationship between the CITY and the CONTRACTOR, then the CONTRACTOR agrees to reimburse the CITY for all costs, including accounting and attorneys’ fees, arising out of such audit and any appeals relating thereto. 9.2. Workers’ Compensation Law. The CONTRACTOR shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding the CONTRACTOR and the CONTRACTOR’s employees. The CONTRACTOR further agrees to indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from any failure of the CONTRACTOR to comply with applicable workers’ compensation laws. The CITY shall have the right to offset against the amount of any compensation due to the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement any amount due to the CITY from the CONTRACTOR as a result of the CONTRACTOR’s failure to promptly pay to the CITY any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section. 9.3. Licenses. The CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to the CITY that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of the Page 1039 of 1126 Page 8 of 17 CONTRACTOR to practice its profession. The CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to the CITY that the CONTRACTOR shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, insurance, and approvals which are legally required of the CONTRACTOR to practice its profession. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain a City of Hermosa Beach business license, if required under CITY ordinance. 9.4. Prevailing Wages. CONTRACTOR shall abide by the minimum prevailing rate of wages as determined by the State of California, Department of Industrial Relations for each craft, classification, or type of worker employed to carry out provisions of the Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall keep on file sufficient evidence of its employee compensation to enable verification of compliance of Prevailing Wages as established by State of California, Department of Industrial Relations. 10. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. The CONTRACTOR confirms that it has no financial, contractual, or other interest or obligation that conflicts with or is harmful to performance of its obligations under this Agreement. The CONTRACTOR shall not during the term of this Agreement knowingly obtain such an interest or incur such an obligation, nor shall it employ or subcontract with any person for performance of this Agreement who has such incompatible interest or obligation. 11. NON-DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. The CONTRACTOR represents and agrees that it does not and will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, medical condition, sex, sexual orientation and/or gender identity, national origin, political affiliation or opinion, or pregnancy or pregnancy-related condition. 12. RECORDS AND AUDITS. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property, and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Agreement and such other records as may be deemed necessary by the CITY or any authorized representative, and will be retained for three years after the expiration of this Agreement. All such records shall be made available for inspection or audit by the CITY at any time during regular business hours. Page 1040 of 1126 Page 9 of 17 13. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. It is understood and agreed that the CITY shall own all documents and other work product of the CONTRACTOR, except the CONTRACTOR’s notes and workpapers, which pertain to the work performed under this Agreement. The CITY shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion and without further compensation to the CONTRACTOR, but any re-use of such documents by the CITY on any other project without prior written consent of the CONTRACTOR shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall at its sole expense provide all such documents to the CITY upon request. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR is and shall at all times remain as to the CITY a wholly independent CONTRACTOR. Neither the CITY nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of the CONTRACTOR or any of the CONTRACTOR’s employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The CONTRACTOR shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of the CITY or otherwise act on behalf of the CITY as an agent. 15. NOTICE. All Notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed made when delivered to the applicable party’s representative as provided in this Agreement. Additionally, such notices may be given to the respective parties at the following addresses, or at such other addresses as the parties may provide in writing for this purpose. Such notices shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. mail, first- class postage prepaid, and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Page 1041 of 1126 Page 10 of 17 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attention: Joe SanClemente, Director Public Works Department CONTRACTOR: ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ Attention: ____________________ 16. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. 17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or written, between the parties, and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, oral or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein. Any agreement, statement, or promise not contained in the Agreement, and any modification to the Agreement, will be effective only if signed by both parties. 18. ATTORNEYS’ FEES. In any action brought to declare the rights granted herein or to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees in an amount determined by the court. 19. WAIVER. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this agreement. Payment of any invoice by the CITY shall not constitute a waiver of the CITY’s right to obtain correction or replacement of any defective or noncompliant work product. Page 1042 of 1126 Page 11 of 17 20. EXECUTION. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 21. AUTHORITY TO ENTER AGREEMENT. The CONTRACTOR has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform this Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the _____ day of ________________, 2022. CONTRACTOR: (Company Name) _____________________________________ ______(TITLE)_________________________ Contractors State License #: ______________ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: City Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________________ City Attorney Page 1043 of 1126 Page 12 of 17 PERFORMANCE BOND (TO BE EXECUTED WITHIN 5 (FIVE) DAYS OF CONTRACT AWARD) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WHEREAS the CITY of Hermosa Beach (Owner) has awarded to ____________________ as principal hereinafter designated as the "Contractor," a contract to provide Landscape Maintenance Services. AND WHEREAS, the Contractor is required to furnish a bond in connection with said contract guaranteeing the faithful performance thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Contractor and Surety, are held firmly bound unto the Owner in the penal sum of _______________________________________________ ($_____.__), which is one hundred percent of the total contract amount for the above stated project, to be paid to the Owner, its successors and assigns, for which payment well and truly to be made we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH: That if said Contractor, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions, and agreements in the foregoing contract and any alteration thereof made as therein provided on its or their part to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the Owner, its officers, and agents, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become and be null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. In case suit is brought upon this bond, the said surety will pay a reasonable attorney's fee to the Owner in an amount to be fixed by the court. Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no amendment, change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to said contract, and of any feature or item or items of performance required therein or thereunder, shall in any manner affect its obligations on or under this bond; and said surety does hereby waive notice of any such amendment, change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to said contract, and of any feature or item or items of performance required therein or thereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals on the _____day of ____________________________, 2022. CONTRACTOR SURETY Subscribed and sworn to this day of , 2022. Page 1044 of 1126 Page 13 of 17 Notary Public Page 1045 of 1126 Page 14 of 17 PAYMENT BOND (TO BE EXECUTED WITHIN FIVE (5) DAYS OF CONTRACT AWARD) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THAT WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach (Owner) has awarded to ____________________________., as Contractor, a contract to provide Landscape Maintenance Services. AND WHEREAS, said Contractor is required to furnish a bond in connection with said contract, to secure the payment of claims of laborers, mechanics, materials persons, and other persons as provided by law; NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Contractor and Surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Hermosa Beach as Owner in the penal sum of __________________________________________ Dollars ($______.__) which is 100 percent of the total contract amount for the above stated project, for which payment well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH: That if said Contractor, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, or subcontractors, shall fail to pay any of the persons named in Civil Code Section 3181, or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed by any such claimant, or any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of the Contractor and its subcontractors pursuant to Section 13020 of the Unemployment Insurance Code, with respect to such work and labor, that the surety or sureties herein will pay for the same in any amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond, otherwise the above obligation shall be void. In case suit is brought upon this bond, the said surety will pay a reasonable attorney's fee to the Owner in an amount to be fixed by the court. This bond shall insure to the benefit of any of the persons named in Civil Code Section 3181 as to give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals on this day of _______________, 2022. CONTRACTOR SURETY Subscribed and sworn to this day of , 2022. Page 1046 of 1126 Page 15 of 17 Notary Public Page 1047 of 1126 Page 16 of 17 NONCOLLUSION AFFIDAVIT TO BE EXECUTED BY EACH AWARDEE OF A PRINCIPAL CONTRACT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )ss COUNTY OF ) being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he is (sole owner, a partner, president, etc.) of _________________________________________________________________, the party making the foregoing bid, that such bid is not made in the interest of or behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation, that such bid is genuine and not collusive or sham, that said bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding, that said bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreements, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of said bidder or of any other bidder, or to fix the overhead, profit or cost element of such bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contractor or anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in such bid are true and, further, that said bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his bid price, or any breakdown thereof, of the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid and will not pay any fee in connection therewith to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agency thereof, or to any other individual, except to such person or persons who have a partnership of other financial interest with said bidder in his general business. Signed ___ Title Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 2022. Notary Public Page 1048 of 1126 Page 17 of 17 COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATE Pursuant to Section 1861 of the State Labor Code, each Contractor to whom a public works contract has been awarded shall sign the following certificate and shall submit same to the City of Hermosa Beach prior to performing any work on this contract: I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract. CONTRACTOR: _______________________. __(TITLE)_______________________ Date Page 1049 of 1126 1A EXHIBIT A Section 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. Summary of Work Covered by Contract Documents A. The Work covered under this contract includes landscape maintenance services for the City of Hermosa Beach. B. The Contractor is required to furnish all labor, materials, services, tools, equipment, transportation, hauling, dumping, fertilizers, seeds, plants, insurance, bonds, security, notifications, licenses, permits, fees in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulatory requirements, and any other items needed to complete the specified work in strict accordance with the Contract Documents. Any miscellaneous labor, equipment, and/or materials not specifically detailed or specified but required to complete the work shall be provided by the Contractor as an integral part of the work, at no increase in cost to the Owner. C. Scope of Work Contractor shall perform all work necessary to complete the agreement in a manner satisfactory to the Public Works Director or his/her designee. The work to be done under these specifications shall include the furnishing of all labor, material, equipment, tools, disposal site or disposal transfer station expense and any other incidental expense necessary to perform the following services for the City of Hermosa Beach. The areas to be maintained shall include turf areas, ground cover areas, trees and shrubs in parks, medians and the downtown area. Including landscaped areas surrounding City owned facilities (City Hall, City Storage Building, City Yard, Clark Building, Community Center, Community Services Building, Hermosa Beach Library, Hermosa Beach Fire Station, and Hermosa Beach Police Department. D. Level of Maintenance 1. All work shall be performed in accordance with the maintenance standards at frequencies established by City representative, so as to maintain a pleasing aesthetic level. Standards and frequencies may be modified from time to time as deemed necessary by the City for the proper maintenance of these parks and medians. 2. The following must be done weekly at all parks: mow turf, edging, shrubs, hardscape maintenance, and visual inspections. Litter must be picked up daily. Page 1050 of 1126 2A 3. The City shall make weekly inspections of all areas included in the agreement. The results of each inspection shall be recorded and retained for reference. The City shall allot ten (10) hours. Contractor shall compensate the City for all time required for inspection and supervision in excess of the above-specified time, providing that: 1) The excess time is, in the opinion of the City, required due to an inadequate level of maintenance as specified herein; 2) That the Contractor has failed to correct said deficiencies within 3 working days after notification. Compensation shall be charged at a rate including actual time, mileage and fringe benefit costs incurred by the City. Notices and penalties for non-performance are set forth as follows: 1) Deficiency Notice: Contractor is required to correct deficiencies within the time specified by the City. 2) Withholding of Payment: Provided work under the deficiency notice has not been completed within the time allotted, payment for subject deficiency shall be withheld until deficiency is corrected, without right to retroactive payments. E. Extra Work Extra work is that work not included under the various proposal items nor the result of the Contractor’s negligence. Extra work shall include but not be limited to new planting of shrubs and trees, replanting of ground cover, backfilling washed out areas, pulling weeds from residential sidewalks, etc. The City will pay for all extra work at a price approved by the City prior to completion of the work. Any additional laborers will be paid at a rate equal to the wage rate and mark up per the Contractor’s hourly rates. Contractor shall be responsible for any losses or damage due to negligence as determined by the City representative. Contractor shall obtain written approval from the City representative prior to proceeding with any extra work except for emergency repairs. Contractor shall submit a written proposal to the City when extra work is required or requested by the City, this proposal shall indicate labor cost(s) that are equal to the contract wage rate including mark up and market rate material costs including mark up, if any. The City reserves the right to have any extra work completed by other Contractors or City forces. All work performed under this section shall not interfere with or reduce normal maintenance schedules or activities. Separate crews shall be utilized for extra work unless otherwise agreed upon by the City’s representative. F. Working Hours Page 1051 of 1126 3A Monday through Sunday 8AM to 5PM G. Park or Building Closures In the event any area of a park is unusable for any reason, including acts of nature or vandalism, the City may declare, for the purpose of maintenance, the park is closed. Notwithstanding, any provisions contained elsewhere in this agreement, the City reserves the right to perform any repair or construction work it deems advisable, including normal routine maintenance contemplated by this agreement, with its own labor and equipment or through a third party. Contractor shall provide credit for days not worked at a location due to park closures or City projects. In The event, any City building is closed for construction where the landscaping is not accessible or being replaced as a city project. There shall be no billing for that facility until the building / landscaping is completed and opened to the public. H. Damages Contractor shall report immediately any damage to City equipment or property. Contractor shall be liable for damages caused by his/her vehicular traffic. Any repairs and associated cost resulting from Contractor vehicle damage shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. I. Materials and Equipment to be Provided by Contractor Contractor at his own cost and expense shall furnish all necessary equipment, supplies, and materials of good quality and in the amounts necessary to fulfill this agreement and to accomplish an acceptable and professional level of maintenance. These equipment, supplies, and materials shall include, but not be limited to: 1. All necessary gas, oil, and spare parts for all equipment. 2. All necessary top dressing, seed, fertilizers, amendments, tree stakes, fasteners, and City approved pest control. 3. Contractor shall replace all trees, shrubs, and ground cover if dead or damaged due to Contractor negligence. Contractor shall secure the City’s approval of the type of each supply, material or equipment prior to its use or installation on park facilities. The City will provide water at each park site at no cost to the Contractor. J. Equipment Noise Page 1052 of 1126 4A Each internal combustion engine used for any purpose on the project or related to the project shall be equipped with a muffler of a type recommended by the manufacturer. No internal combustion engine shall be operated on the agreement without said muffler. (It is preferred that electric equipment be used when possible.) Said noise level requirement shall apply to all equipment on the project or related to the project including but not limited to trucks, or transient equipment that may or may not be owned by the Contractor. The use of loud sound signals shall be avoided in favor of light warnings except those required by safety laws for the protection of the public or Contractor's personnel. K. Blowers Use of leaf blowers within the City was prohibited as of July 1, 1988, and the operation of any mechanical device to blow leaves, dirt or other debris is prohibited by Municipal Code Chapter 8.24.040. L. Inclement Weather Contractor shall not perform any operations during inclement weather, which may destroy or damage ground cover or turf areas. Contractor shall contact the City for the determination of non-operation conditions. During inclement weather, Contractor shall provide staffing for citywide park inspections, debris removal and cleanup in addition to work described in the contractor documents. Contractor shall perform such duties as replacing tree stakes, re-tie trees, and remove debris from catch basins in parks and some street areas as instructed by City Representative. M. Air Pollution Contractor shall comply with all air pollution control rules, regulations, ordinances and statutes, which apply to any work, performed pursuant to the agreement and shall not discharge smoke, dust or any other air contaminants into the atmosphere in such quantity as will violate the regulations of any legally constituted authority. Material to be disposed of shall not be burned. N. Special Provision Traffic and Detours 1. General Contractor shall provide all labor, materials and equipment to install barriers, guards, lights, signs, temporary bridges, flag-persons; advising the public of detours and construction/maintenance hazards, and, Page 1053 of 1126 5A upon completion of the work, promptly remove all signs and warning devices. Contractor shall be responsible for compliance with additional public safety requirements, which may arise during landscape installations at the park site. Contractor shall notify the City twenty-four (24) hours in advance of closing, partial closing or reopening of any street or public thoroughfare. Contractor shall provide a traffic control plan from the WHATCH Manual to be approved by City representative before the work begins. The traffic control devices should be in place when work is occurring. 2. Responsibility Should Contractor appear to be neglectful or negligent in furnishing warning and protective measures, the City may direct attention to the existence of a hazard, and the necessary warning and protective measures shall be furnished and installed by the Contractor, at the Contractor's expense. 3. Hauling Spillage resulting from operations on or across public thoroughfares shall be immediately removed as specified in the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 8.44.060 at Contractor's expense. When entering or leaving roadways carrying public traffic, the Contractor's equipment, whether empty or loaded, shall in all cases yield to public traffic. O. Disposal of Debris Contractor, as specified in the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 8.44.060, shall promptly dispose of all debris accumulated as a result of maintenance operations and shall not allow any debris therefore to remain on the public street or other public property after 5:00 P.M. on the day which they are collected. Debris is defined as grass clippings, leaves, branches, paper and all foreign matter, etc. All debris shall be disposed of at the City Yard. Disposal of debris shall be performed at no additional cost to the City and shall be considered to be included as part of the Contractor’s proposal price. P. Maintenance Schedules Contractor is required to furnish weekly, monthly, and annual maintenance schedules to include planned activities for all persons performing any function of the agreement. The schedules shall be submitted to the City no later than the start of the agreement and shall be updated as necessary. Page 1054 of 1126 6A Q. Herbicides/Pesticides The use of any and all herbicides and pesticides are prohibited in the City of Hermosa Beach, thus the routine maintenance of weed control must be maintained by hand operation or other methods other than herbicides; other methods (mechanical, mulching, etc.) that are required to maintain a positive aesthetic area can also be used. R. Arborist Services Contractor shall provide Arborist services when requested. This includes all trees covered in this contract. Any dead or diseased trees that require removal will be inspected by the Arborist and Contractors reprehensive prior to removal, a written report or memo will be required City may require Arborist service in determining the condition and potential hazards of city trees. S. Submittals The following submittals are required prior to commencement of work. 1. Traffic Control Plan 2. List of equipment to be used 3. Emergency contacts 4. Letters Identifying Site Authorized Contractor’s Representative or “Superintendent” and Contractor’s “Competent Person” 5. Copy of City business license 6. And others as requested by the Public Works Superintendent Page 1055 of 1126 7A 2. Descriptions of Items in the Proposal Schedule The following descriptions of Proposal Items are intended to clarify and expand on the description of Proposal Items in the Proposal Schedule. All items of work described shall be included in the amount proposal for that item. The following tables provide the items of work to be completed at each location. For specifications about the work, see Section 2.1- Description of Work in Special Provisions. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKETTES Item No. Park Name and Address Description of Work 1 Ardmore Park 491 Ardmore Avenue • Turf Care • Irrigation • Park Furniture • Sidewalks • Trees • Litter Control 2 Bi-Centennial Park 550 4th Street • Turf Care • Irrigation • Park Furniture • Sidewalks • Trees • Litter Control 3 Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue • Turf Care • Irrigation • Park Furniture • Planters • Basketball Court • Decomposed Granite Care • Sidewalks • Trees • Litter Control 4 Fort Lots-of-Fun 1102 6th Street • Turf Care • Irrigation • Park Furniture • Planters • Trash Cans (Only from June to September) • Sidewalks • Trees • Litter Control 5 Greenwood Park 1102 Pacific Coast Highway • Turf Care • Irrigation • Planters • Sidewalks • Trees • Litter Control 6 Greenbelt • Turf Care • Irrigation • Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains • Planters • Exercise Equipment • Fire Pit • Entrance Ways to Wood Chip Path • Litter Control Page 1056 of 1126 8A 7 Kay Etow Parkette Monterey Boulevard and Lyndon Street • Turf Care • Irrigation • Park Furniture • Planters • Sidewalks • Trees • Litter Control 8 Clark Field 861 Valley Drive • Turf Care • Irrigation • Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains • One (1) Tennis Court • Planters • Sidewalks • Litter Control • Two (2) Basketball Courts • Four (4) Pickleball Courts • Lawn Bowling Green • 9 Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street • Turf Care • Irrigation • Park Furniture • Planters • Sidewalks • One (1) Basketball Court • Trees • Litter Control 10 Noble Park 1400 The Strand • Turf Care • Irrigation • Planters • Litter Control • Trees • Trash Cans - (Only From June to September) • Sidewalks • Decomposed Granite Path • Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains 11 Ocean View Parkette 857 3rd Street • Turf Care • Irrigation • Planters • Sidewalks • Trees • Litter Control 12 Sand Hill Parkette Manhattan Avenue and Loma Drive • Turf Care • Irrigation • Planters • Stairs • Sidewalks • Tree • Litter Control 13 Scout Parkette 1402 Prospect Avenue • Turf Care • Irrigation • Planters • Sidewalks • Trees • Litter Control 14 Sea View Parkette 1870 Prospect Avenue • Turf Care • Playground Equipment • Park Furniture • Planters • Irrigation • Trash Cans (Between June and September) • Sidewalks • Trees • Litter Control • BBQ 15 Shaffer Parkette • Turf Care • Sidewalks Page 1057 of 1126 9A 3231 Ingleside Drive • Park Furniture • Planters • BBQ • Trees • Litter Control 16 South Park 425 Valley Park • Turf Care • Irrigation • Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains • Sidewalks • Trees • Planters • BBQ • Playground • Decomposed Granite Pathway • Litter Control • Trash Cans (June to September) 17 Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive • Turf Care • Irrigation • Planters • BBQ • Litter Control • Trees • Playground • Fire Pit • Trash Cans (June To September) • Sidewalks • Park Furniture and Drinking Fountains • One (1) Basketball Court LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF CITY FACILITIES Item No. Facility Name and Address Description of Work 18 City Hall 1315 Valley Drive • Irrigation • Sidewalks • Litter Control • Planters • Trees • Entrances • Trash Cans Note: City Hall includes the front of the building and Bard Street behind the building. To examine the area behind City Hall, Proposer should contact Public Works. 19 City Storage 1110 6th Street • Litter Control • Sidewalks • Entrances • • Irrigation • Planters • Trees 20 City Yard 555 6th Street • Turf Care • Litter Control • Sidewalks • Trees 21 Clark Building 861 Valley Drive • Turf Care • Litter Control • Sidewalks • Planters • Trees • Entrances • Irrigation Page 1058 of 1126 10A 22 Community Center 710 Pier Avenue • Turf Care • Irrigation • Planters • Entrances • Litter Control • Sidewalks 23 Community Services Building 1035 Valley Drive • Turf Care • Litter Control • Sidewalks • Trees • Picnic Tables 24 Hermosa Beach Library 550 Pier Avenue • Litter Control • Sidewalks • Planters • Entrances 25 Hermosa Beach Fire Station 540 Pier Avenue • Litter Control • Sidewalks • Planters • Trees • Benches • Entrances 26 Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue • Litter Control • Sidewalks • Planters • Trees • Stairs • Benches BALL FIELD MAINTENANCE AT CLARK FIELD Item No. Field Type Description 60 1 Soccer Field • To be maintained daily during soccer season (September through December). • To be maintained on an as-needed basis, as determined by the City. • Litter Control 61 3 Baseball Fields • To be maintained daily during the regular season (February 1st through July 31st). • To be maintained on an as-needed basis, as determined by the City, normally 2-3 times a week. • Litter Control Page 1059 of 1126 11A MAINTENANCE OF TENNIS COURTS, BASKETBALL COURTS, PICKLEBALL COURTS, AND SKATE PARK Item No. Item Type Location Description 61 Tennis Courts Clark Field 861 Valley Drive To be washed down once a month. Community Center 710 Pier Avenue • To be washed down once a month. • Plant growth should be edged so no plant material (ivy) is on the court surfaces. 62 Pickleball Courts Clark Field 861 Valley Drive To be washed down once a month. 63 Basketball Courts Clark Field 861 Valley Drive To be washed down once a month. Edith Rodaway Friendship Park 350 Prospect Avenue To be washed down once a month. Moondust Parkette 1014 2nd Street To be swept. As part of this RFP, Proposer is encouraged to recommend a schedule of maintenance for sweeping the basketball court. Valley Park 2521 Valley Drive To be swept. As part of this RFP, Proposer is encouraged to recommend a schedule of maintenance for sweeping the basketball court. 64 Skate Park Community Center 710 Pier Avenue • To be washed down once a month. • Litter removal. PLACEMENT OF WOOD CHIPS Item No. Location Description 65 Greenbelt Wood chips are to be replaced twice a year and as needed. 66 South Park Wood chips in the play area are to be replaced twice a year. Page 1060 of 1126 12A 3. Office For Inquires and Complaints The Contractor shall maintain an office at some fixed place and shall maintain a telephone therein, listed in the telephone directory in his/her own name or in the file name by which he/she is commonly known, and shall at all times during the hours between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM of each working day have a full-time employee at said office for the answering of inquiries and for receiving complaints from the Director of Public Works. The Contractor shall maintain a written log of all complaints, the date thereof, and the action taken pursuant thereto or the reason for non-action. Such a log of complaints shall be open to the inspection of the Director of Public Works. The Contractor shall make every reasonable effort to respond to complaints on the same day they are received and shall report to the Director of Public Works within twenty-four (24) hours as to the action taken concerning each complaint. 4. Public Relations Contractor shall, in person or through his/her agent, investigate any complaint, which may concern, or be involved in, the performance of the contract. Contractor shall report to the Director of Public Works, or designee, the following working day as to the action taken with reference to the complaint and, when necessary, complete a Service Request, which will remain on file at City Hall. Complaints received before noon shall be answered the same day; complaints received after noon shall be answered the following day. 5. Emergency Call Back The Contractor shall provide employees and equipment to respond to any after hour emergency, sewer plug or spill. A 24-hour contact phone number shall be provided by the Contractor. Contractor must respond within 30 minutes after being contacted by the City. Contractor must mobilize and have the appropriate personnel and equipment in the City of Hermosa Beach within two (2) hours from when the emergency phone call was received per the base proposal or within one (1) hour from when the emergency phone call was received per the alternative proposal. The emergency may require as Vactor truck and video camera vehicle. This response requirement includes nights, weekends, holidays, and all hours. For proposal purposes, costs for this service shall include all mobilization and hourly costs using a two-man, two-hour minimum service. 6. Damages Page 1061 of 1126 13A The Contractor shall report without delay any damage to City equipment, City property or private property. The Contractor shall be liable for damages caused by his/her actions. Any repairs and associated cost resulting from Contractor caused damage shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. Page 1062 of 1126 14A Section 2 Description of Work Items General Maintenance The following details pertain to landscape maintenance of all City parks, parkettes, facilities, medians, planters, and parkways. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to visit each site to determine and verify all estimates. The City will not be responsible for any errors or omissions in the estimates. The Contractor shall ask the City for resolution of Questions in this section before submitting a proposal. 1. Turf a. Care All turf areas shall be maintained at a mowing height of one (1) inch to one and one- half (1½) inches. Turfs shall be mowed once a week. During heavy growth seasons or for special events, extra mowing may be required by the City, and performed by the Contractor at no additional cost to the City. Turf shall be swept, vacuumed, or otherwise cleaned to maintain a neat appearance at all times. Turf clippings and debris shall be lifted the same day of each mowing, trimming or edging operation and shall be removed from the site as specified in Municipal Code, Chapter 8.44.060. Contractor shall pay special attention so as to have the turf areas in their best appearance fat all times Turf shall be over-seeded twice annually in all parks and as needed in the heavily worn areas. See Section titled Over-Seeding. Bare areas shall be re-seeded with a topper; a nontoxic weed control shall be used to keep turf looking aesthetically pleasing after approval of City representative Contractor shall take special care not to cause any damage to the turf or Greenbelt area with vehicles or mowing equipment. Contractor shall complete repairs immediately after damage occurs. b. Edging and Trimming Turf shall be trimmed to the edge of sidewalks, curbs, mow strips, retaining walls, posts, valve boxes, controllers, light standards and any paved surface. Turf shall be kept trimmed to a sufficient distance from sprinkler heads to ensure proper sprinkler coverage and for a distance of eighteen (18) inches from all tree trunks. Contractor shall exercise care not to injure the tree trunks with mechanical equipment. Contractor shall also keep turf trimmed to a sufficient distance from all valve and quick coupler irrigation boxes. Page 1063 of 1126 15A 1. c. Quarterly Fertilization Treatment All turf areas shall be fertilized to a minimum of four times a year or greater as is necessary to maintain a healthy appearance and condition. Fertilizer material tags shall be submitted to the City for approval before application. All plants, ground cover, shrubs, and trees shall be fertilized and treated as necessary to maintain a healthy condition and appearance. Fertilizers shall be mixed to a depth of 3” and replenished at a frequency to maintain an aesthetically pleasing appearance. This is for all plant and flower beddings. d. Soil Aeration All turf areas shall be aerated a minimum of two (2) times each year. This minimum aeration will be scheduled for: February 1st to February 28th and August 1st to August 31st. These dates are subject to change at the City’s discretion. Aeration should be accomplished just prior to fertilizer application. The entire turf areas shall be aerated with a self-propelled machine that removes cores of soil 3/4" in diameter by four (4) to six (6) inches long, spaced no more than six (6) inches apart before aerating. e. Overseeding Contractor shall over-seed all turf areas twice annually. In addition Contractor shall over-seed the Christmas Tree Lot located at Community Center east turf area the first week of January, each year of the agreement. Contractor Shall over seed areas that need special care as requested by the Public Works representative. f. Thatch Removal Thatch shall be removed with a vertical mower, or its approved equal, once a year coordinated with soil aeration of all turf areas as directed by the City. Care shall be taken to avoid unnecessary or excessive injury to the turf grass stand. Contractor shall sweep or rake the dislodged thatch from the turf -areas and remove from the park site as specified in Municipal Code, Chapter 8.44.060. After the thatch is removed, turf shall be aerated, fertilized, and watered. This operation shall be coordinated with Section titled Fertilization. Page 1064 of 1126 16A 2. Shrubs, Bushes, and Planters Shrubs and bushes shall be selectively pruned to a distance of one (1) foot from fences, buildings, driveways, sidewalks, trees, retaining walls and sprinkler heads. Contractor shall prune where necessary to maintain safe vehicular and pedestrian visibility as directed by the City. Contractor shall provide sufficient landscape detail to maintain an aesthetic and trimmed appearance. a. Mulch Planters shall be mulched to a depth of 3” and replenished at a frequency to maintain this depth and an aesthetically pleasing appearance. This includes the Hermosa Avenue medians from 10th Street to 14th Street, Hermosa Avenue center medians from 27th Street to 35th Street, Pier Avenue Planters, City Hall planters, and Community Center planters. Mulch is to be approved by the city representative. 3. Ground Covers a. Definition Ground covers are low growing plants that grow in colonies to form a solid mat over the surface of the ground. They spread by rhizomes, stolen or by roots, which form at the nodes of trailing branches that come in contact with the soil. These plants give a flat or two-dimensional effect to the landscape, such as but not limited to, archtotheca, osteopermum, trailing gazania and lantana, ivy, trachelospermum, baccharis, and varieties of ice plant. b. Ground Cover Trimming Ground cover shall be kept trimmed to the edge of sidewalks, light fixtures, driveways, mow strips, retaining walls and buildings. Ground cover shall be kept one (1) foot from fences, property lines, trees and shrubs. In no case shall ground cover be allowed to climb walls, fences, light fixtures, buildings, shrubs and/or trees unless otherwise approved by the City. c. Turf Care/Edging Coordination All turf cutting and turf edging will be completed in the same area on the same day. All debris clean-up shall be completed the same day. d. Cultivation Page 1065 of 1126 17A The open soil between plants shall be regularly cultivated where the planting permits. Contractor shall pay special attention to the maintenance of the flowerbed and planter area. e. Replanting Replanting will be required to maintain the continuity of the ground cover area, and replacements shall be as approved by the City. 4. Irrigation a. Inspection Irrigation should be inspected daily as landscaping maintenance occurs . Any broken sprinklers heads , valve boxes or any other irrigation items shall be repaired immediately when possible. any damaged irrigation shall be communicated to the Public Works representative and entered in the daily log of activities. Irrigation shall also be inspected for coverage as needed, any deficiencies in coverage from the irrigation system shall be reported to the Public Works representative and entered in the daily log of activities. b. Adjustment An automatic irrigation system is provided at some sites for the Contractor's use to maintain optimum soil moisture content in order to ensure healthy, vigorous growth but shall not be intended as the only means of irrigation. Manual watering shall be required at all locations where an automatic irrigation system is not provided and shall be done so as to prevent runoff to adjacent streets, sidewalks and gutters Municipal Code, Chapter 8.44.060). Any over spraying of the sprinkler systems on to areas other than intended shall be corrected immediately. City shall be responsible for properly coordinating the various time clocks and adjusting the various watering schedules to provide adequate water to maintain all planted areas in a thriving condition and so as not to be interfered with by an interruption of electrical power or malfunctioning of the controller or control valves for more than two consecutive days. Contractor shall be required to water by other means if necessary to prevent deterioration of the areas affected. Contractor shall perform all irrigation work so as not to interfere with the public's use of the park facility. Contractor shall limit the use of water concurrent with the weather situation and to the satisfaction of the City. Contractor shall make minor adjustment to keep irrigation heads in proper operating condition at all times. Contractor shall adjust irrigation heads as necessary so that all water is directed away from streets, sidewalks and gutters (Municipal Code, Chapter Page 1066 of 1126 18A 8.44.060). Contractor shall report irrigation problems where landscape has been affected by lack of water. In the event of mandatory water rationing, the Contractor shall reduce water consumption on all landscape areas in accordance with instructions from the City. 5. Infection, Disease, and Pest Control Contractor shall provide a complete non-pesticide/herbicide solution to insect, disease and pest control as necessary or as directed by the City representative so as to keep plant materials in a healthy condition and free from insects and disease. Control of rodents, snails, slugs, and sow bugs, by use of traps is permissible. Contractor shall not use any poisonous materials. Contractor shall obtain the City's approval forty-eight (48) hours prior to the use of any mechanical or any other method of control. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to notify the City of any infection or disease of any trees or landscape. The labor and material needed to complete this section is considered normal maintenance, not extra work and no charge to the City. 6. Weed Control At all locations in the Contract. Complete removal of all weed growth shall be accomplished every week on a continuing basis, as weeds appear and not just once each week. Landscaped areas shall be weeded before any weeds reach four (4) inches in height. For the purpose of this agreement, a weed will be considered as "any undesirable or misplaced plant". Weeds shall be controlled either by hand or mechanical methods. 7. Annual Plantings Annual plantings refer to adding plants as specified at the specified location to remove dead plans and to replace them with similar plans to maintain the fullness and numbers of plants in the area. Contractor shall provide one-gallon drought tolerant plants annually for the planters at the City Hall entrance and the raised planter boxes on Hermosa Avenue between 10th and 14th Streets. Contractor shall provide annual drought tolerant re-planting at the Windmill planters and the Veteran’s Memorial prior to Veterans Day. 8. Replacement of Dead Plant Material Page 1067 of 1126 19A Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining healthy plant material. Contractor shall be responsible for replacement (equal size) of any plant material, shrubs, bushes which through his/her act or omission dies during the length of this agreement. 9. Sand Play Areas Play areas covered by sand shall be kept free of weeds, litter, and debris. Sand shall be kept in a reasonably leveled condition as directed by the City to prevent the development of large holes or the exposure of equipment footings or foundations. Sand areas should be tilled and maintained in a manner so as to minimize the presence of densely compacted conditions. Play areas to be checked daily for broken glass and hazards, which need immediate correction. Sand shavings shall be swept from the adjoining walkways as directed by the City daily. Special care is to be taken in cleaning and maintaining the drinking fountains from sand-related problems and plugs. Contractor to replenish sand in sand play areas twice a year to maintain level at the designated level. Sand play areas exist at South Park, Valley Park, Seaview Park and Fort Lots of Fun. 10. Engineered Wood Fibers South Park The South Park Engineered Wood Fibers in the playground areas shall be replenished and compacted (2) two times a year per schedule to maintain the surface at the designated level. At no time the depth of the engineered wood Fibers shall be less than 8” after compaction. Additional material shall be added to achieve the standard required depth of the engineered wood fibers. 11. Park Furniture Park benches, tables, and drinking fountains to be kept clean daily and any damages or graffiti shall be reported to Public Works. Any stickers shall be removed. Any damaged park furniture shall be reported to the Public Works representative 12. Barbeques Barbeques (BBQs) are to be emptied of coals, ash, and litter daily and as needed. Page 1068 of 1126 20A 13. Decomposed Granite Decomposed Granite areas shall be kept in neat and clean condition, free from weeds and debris. Contractor shall keep low worn areas level by filling in low areas and compacting so as to provide a smooth safe surface. stabilizing agent needs to be applied to all repaired areas. Per manufacturer’s specifications The condition is to be maintained weekly. Contractor will be responsible for minor replacement of decomposed granite not to exceed 10 yards per year. 14. Trash Cans Trashcans located at all city Parks are to be maintained and emptied once a day 7 days a week including holidays from the month of June through September (summer months). Contractor will be responsible for trash bags and picking up any surrounding trash. Time of pick up is to be coordinated. 15. Sidewalks at Parks Park Sidewalks are to be swept daily on service days and kept free of debris. Valley Park and South Park are to be swept 7 days a week. The sidewalk area in front of City Hall is to be swept daily. 16. Greenbelt a. The ice plant along the curbside around the trees and walk paths must be trimmed and maintained within a frequency to present a manicured aesthetic appearance. Curbside areas to be trimmed are not to exceed 18 inches from the curb. b. All tree branches must be trimmed that may be blocking any of the pathways; dead plants must be removed and replaced in a timely manner. c. Contractor shall be sensitive to the aesthetic nature of the Greenbelt in particular at the street intersection areas and shall provide sufficient detail efforts to produce an enhanced appearance. (This may require the removal and replacement of outdated/overgrown and/or unsightly landscaping.) Note: This activity shall be part of the contract price and not considered extra work. d. Wood chip replacement. Contractor will maintain the wood chips on the Greenbelt: The center walk path must have a minimum depth of three (3) inches of wood chips. The required wood chips are 3” Minus Wood Chips. Wood chips must be clear of debris, stems, and/or branches that may present a difficulty to pedestrians Wood chips must be 3-Inch shall not exceed a maximum of three inches in length. Page 1069 of 1126 21A Prior to wood chip installation, ground surface should be leveled with dirt. Repaired areas to be compacted before wood chips are installed. Wood chips are to be replenished throughout the entire Greenbelt pathway 2 times a year. The estimate is 400 cubic yards twice a year and as needed, which is estimated to be an additional 200 cubic yards. City Representative will coordinate and approve the same type of dried wood chips that is currently on the Greenbelt pathway. Mulch or wood chips must be maintained around the base of all trees. Some areas may require manual weed removal; attention must be given to identifying weeds vs. small plants. 16. Lawn Bowling Green Field Contractor will provide special care in maintaining the lawn bowling green. In particular: 1. Contractor shall provide a greens mower like or equal to a Scott-Bonner mower. (City staff must approve). 2. Contractor shall mow two times a week (Tuesday and Thursday), diagonally in both directions each day during the growing season. This can be reduced to two times a week diagonally in one direction each day during the dormant season. Mow in alternate diagonals during the dormant season. 3. Verticut once a month diagonally in both directions. 4. Fertilize six (6) times per year. 5. Aerate two (2) times per year. Complete the aeration by spreading and leveling holes and depressions with a top dressing of 30-grade sand. Contractor is to supply all materials. 6. Use approved weed removal (manual weed removal only). 7. Maintain the sandy ditch around the green. 8. Coordinate work periods with the city representative. 17. Special Care Instructions for Medians and Planters In addition to the description of general landscape maintenance services provided, special care is needed for the following medians and planters. These locations are listed by their proposal item number. Page 1070 of 1126 22A Item 28: Medians on Aviation Boulevard, from Pacific Coast Highway to Harper Avenue. This area consists of tree wells and raised asphalt medians requiring litter removal, weeding, and sweeping. Item 31: Medians on Pacific Coast Highway, from 24th Street to Gould Avenue. This is a raised asphalt median requiring litter removal, sweeping, and weeding. Item 32: Medians on Pier Avenue, from Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive. This area has tree grates will require litter removal. Item 33: Planters on 2nd Street and The Strand require weeding, cultivating, litter removal, and replanting. How often replanting, how many plans Item 36: Planters on Pier Plaza, from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand, have tree grates that will require litter removal. Item 37: Planters in the alley behind Longfellow Avenue and 30th Place have tree grates requiring litter removal. 18. Ball Field Maintenance Clark Field a. Baseball/Softball Field Maintenance Recognizing that the baseball/softball diamonds are high-use facilities and that the proper care and maintenance of these is critical to the safety and well-being of the user-public as well as a deterrent to liability litigation, it is necessary to establish standards to insure adequate playing conditions. The baseball/softball fields are to be maintained on a daily basis, Monday through Sunday during baseball season from February to July. During the off season, the baseball/softball diamonds shall be maintained on an as-needed basis as determined by the City, normally 2-3 times a week, and coordinated with the slow pitch schedule. This work shall be completed before 12:00 PM. each scheduled day. Baseball/softball field maintenance includes watering, dragging, filling in sunken areas, and raking all sand areas for debris. For a complete set of specifications on the care and maintenance of baseball/softball diamonds see the special section titled "Care and Maintenance of Baseball and Softball Diamonds." Special mowing is required at the southeast filled as not to use heavy mowing equipment that could damage turf infield. The responsibility for the condition and maintenance of baseball/softball diamonds shall be as follows: Page 1071 of 1126 23A A. Contractor’s employee shall be responsible for the areas in which the diamonds are located and shall be charged with the overall responsibility for the condition and maintenance of the diamonds. This individual shall, on a daily basis, observe the conditions of the diamonds and take those measures necessary to insure the suitability of the diamonds for play. Definition: Suitability for play - A diamond shall be deemed suitable for play when it is smooth, free of debris, ruts, berms and low spots or any unnamed condition deemed hazardous. B. Contractor’s employee shall meet with the City to inspect each City ball diamond and determine necessary heavy maintenance work to be completed on or before December 1st each year prior to the opening of baseball/softball season. Beginning with the field and turf maintenance the first week of December is mandatory. C. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to notify the City of any heavy maintenance work needed during the pre and playing season. D. Contractor shall be responsible for the installation of base stakes, pitcher and home plates. Contractor personnel shall be responsible for the burning of foul lines in advance of the playing season. E. Contractor shall be responsible for supplying all the additional “Ball Field Mix” (infield dirt) to complete the initial heavy maintenance. This work is to be performed as needed at the proposal cost for supplying an estimated 30 cubic yards of ballfield material. b. Preparation of ball diamond as done by contractor personnel during the regular season February 1st – July 31st A. Preparation of three diamonds shall be done by the Contractor. During the baseball season, diamonds must be cared for daily to provide a continuing high standard of condition. Such preparation is described, sequentially, below. B. Preliminary Watering Home plate and pitcher’s mound will receive the heaviest watering as these areas get most use during actual playing time. Slightly less water will be applied to 1st, 2nd, and 3rd base areas. C. Leveling Using a garden rake with a two-foot metal strip welded to the back, the soil in the batter’s box and pitcher’s mound should be loosened, raked, shaped, leveled and tamped down firmly. If present, the dimple at the pitcher’s mound shall be maintained at a graduated elevation to 12” above the playing surface with a circumference of eight feet (8'). Page 1072 of 1126 24A Soil, which has been worked away around each base, must be replaced in the proper area and tamped down firmly. c. Watering A. The diamond shall be watered thoroughly with the proper amount of water to provide a suitable condition for dragging. As a rule, the appearance of small water bubbles should indicate sufficient watering. B. In all watering of the diamonds, the correct procedure is to water away from yourself with the hose to the rear. Do not walk on the watered areas. d. Dragging A. Ball diamond infields require moisture penetration to prevent a hard, dry condition from developing. It is therefore important that daily dragging be completed to break the crust. The drag used for this purpose should be a minimum 3' X 4' and have 2/3" protruding spikes. B. Upon completion of the crust-breaking drag, a smoothing drag shall be undertaken. The drag is similar to a metal foot scraper, constructed of heavy interwoven metal shaped. The size of the drag is 4' X 6'. C. In all dragging, the correct procedure is to begin in the area of the pitcher’s mound, and drag in overlapping, concentric circles until the entire skinned area is covered. Care should be exercised to prevent build-up of brick dust under the inner edge of the outfield grass causing a raised berm. c. Periodic Special Maintenance The daily dragging of the ball diamond is satisfactory within certain limits. However, after a period of continued maintenance of this type, it becomes necessary to take measures to ensure an even playing surface. A. A "drag", 5’ wide and 8' long, is used for this operation. B. The "drag", towed by a pick-up truck or power equipment, is used to cut down high spots, dragging the excess to low areas. Page 1073 of 1126 25A C. The "drag" includes an adjustable metal cutting blade approximately 5-1/2" wide that can be raised or lowered or set at different angles. D. This operation will be requested through the City to the Contractor’s supervisor responsible for the area. d. Inclement Weather Field Maintenance During the baseball season, both the preparation months of December, January and February and the playing season of February through July, the Contractor must assist in the removal of water from the infields in order to accelerate the drying out process. This could include pumping from the low spots. 19. Soccer Field Maintenance – Valley Park, Clark Field The soccer fields shall be maintained on a daily basis throughout the soccer season of September through December. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to make every effort to bring a field into acceptable condition during periods of intermittent inclement weather. Bare areas and worn areas shall be leveled prior to seeding as part of the contract as per the direction the city’s representative. During the off season, the soccer fields shall be maintained on an as-needed basis as specified in the section titled Turf Care. During the soccer season, all work on soccer fields shall be completed before 2:00 p.m. each day. Recognizing that soccer fields are a high use facility, and that their proper care and maintenance is critical to the safety and well-being of the user-public, and as a deterrent to liability litigation, it is necessary to establish standards to insure adequate playing conditions. All soccer fields shall be aerated twice per year. The turf shall be aerated with a self- propelled machine that removes cores of soil ¾” in diameter by four (4) to six (6) inches long, spaced no more than six (6) inches apart. Soil shall be moist to a depth of at least six (6) inches before aerating. Cores shall be removed from the field during or immediately after aeration. After completion of the aeration process, Contractor is to top dress the turf area with a top dressing City has approved (Earthworks Clay-Breaker or approved equal) with a machine specifically designed for such operations. Page 1074 of 1126 26A Contractor shall be responsible for any and all damages to sprinkler heads, piping, valve boxes, etc. during the aeration process, and shall return any damaged components to full operation upon completion of aeration activities. Contractor’s employee shall, on or before May 1st of each year, meet with City representatives to inspect each soccer field and determine the necessary heavy maintenance work to be completed prior to the opening of the soccer season. It shall be the responsibility of the City to make arrangements with the Contractor for the heavy maintenance deemed necessary (leveling, aeration, fertilization, seed planting, etc.). The City shall direct the Contractor as to the type and application of all turf seeding, if required. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to notify the City of any heavy maintenance work needed during the playing season. Contractor is responsible for all material necessary to complete this task 20. Maintenance of Tennis Courts, Basketball Courts, Pickleball Courts, and Skate Park Contractor shall wash down all tennis courts and the skateboard park using a water broom at the Community Center on the first Tuesday of every month between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and noon. Clark Field tennis courts, basketball courts, and pickleball courts are to be washed down using a water broom the first Monday of every month. Water outlets are provided at each of the tennis court areas. City will provide low flow water wands. Courts may require vacuuming if water restrictions are mandated. The basketball courts at Moondust Park and Valley Park are to be swept twice a month 21. Tree Maintenance Trees are divided into three categories: park trees, median trees, and downtown trees. All trees are to be trimmed annually except those which are over 25’ (twenty-five feet) tall which are trimmed every two years. Eucalyptus trees over 25,’ however, must be trimmed annually. Coral trees must be inspected every six (6) months and trimmed as necessary. An inspection alongside City staff must be made annually to determine the extent of trimming necessary for all trees. Trimming should be done as necessary for safety. Contractor is responsible for furnishing, supplying and performing tree staking. All trees requiring staking shall be securely staked at all times with a stake and secured to the stake with ties. Tree ties shall be inspected regularly to ensure against girdling and abrasion. Contractors are to inspect trees and notify the City of any diseased or hazardous conditions. The City representative shall be notified and must approve any tree trimming. All trees are to be shaped trimmed and pruned to the highest arboricultural standards Page 1075 of 1126 27A as directed by Contractors certified Arborist. Trees less than 25 feet to be trimmed a minimum of once a year. Any dead or damaged branches shall be removed back to a lateral branch. No stubs will be permitted. Contractor shall restrict growth through pruning to maintain safe road visibility, vehicle and pedestrian clearance, equipment accessibility, and to prevent or eliminate hazardous situations. Contractor is responsible for trimming all trees in all City parks and medians within the life of this agreement, in a time frame that is horticulturally correct for the best growth and maintenance of the trees. All tree trimming must begin the first week of October and be completed by January 31st. Park tree trimming scheduled must be completed once started and cannot be delayed unless approved by Public Works Superintendent. There will be no exception for not completing tree trimming within the allowed months. Trees not trimmed will be deducted from payment. Contractor is responsible for replacing any tree damaged due to Contractor negligence. Contractor shall be responsible for removing all dead trees including stump grinding. Stump grinding must be coordinated within 5 days of tree removal Planting of new trees will be negotiated as extra work. All tree branches shall be maintained to a height of thirteen (13) feet above street level for vehicle safety and sight distance, in addition to providing clearance for sidewalk areas at a minimum of 10 feet. Contractor shall comply within two (2) calendar days after the City requests said work. All trees 25’ and under are to be trimmed by the Contractor as part of the regular/annual maintenance routine for parks, medians, and downtown areas. Below are specifications for park trees and median/parkway trees. a. Park Trees Eucalyptus trees shall be trimmed, laced, sized, or reduced as needed annually. An inspection alongside City staff must be made annually to determine the extent of trimming necessary for these trees. All other park trees greater than 25’ (twenty feet) shall be trimmed, laced, sized, or reduced as needed per the following schedules: 1st Fiscal Year July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 Community Center Complex Valley Park Edith Rodaway Friendship Park Sea View Parkette Fort Lots-of-Fun Moondust Parkette Greenwood Park Bicentennial Park Page 1076 of 1126 28A Scout Parkette Ardmore Park 2nd Fiscal Year July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Greenbelt Clark Stadium Kay Etow Park Ingleside Park Noble Park South Park Sand Hill Parkette 3rd Fiscal Year July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 Community Center Valley Park Edith Rodaway Friendship Park Sea View Parkette Fort Lots-of-Fun Moon Dust Park Greenwood Park Bicentennial Park Scout Parkette Ardmore Park 4th Fiscal Year July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026 Greenbelt Clark Stadium Kay Etow Park Ingleside Park Noble Park South Park Sand Hill Parkette Page 1077 of 1126 29A b. Median/Parkway Trees Median trees shall be trimmed, laced, sized, or reduced each year of the agreement. The Public Works Superintendent must approve all work timeframes. Location Number of Trees 14th Street at The Strand 6 14th Street at the Jarvis Memorial 2 15th Street at The Strand 6 16th Street – Walk Street 4 18th Street – Walk Street 5 22nd Street at The Strand 14 2nd Street at The Strand 12 Aviation Boulevard, from Harper west to Pacific Coast Highway 60 Gould Avenue/ Gould Terrace, from Pacific Coast Highway to Ardmore Avenue 24 Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street north to 35th Street, excluding the downtown area 135 Herondo Street, from Valley Drive west to Hermosa Avenue 17 Parking Structure at Hermosa Avenue and 13th Street 4 Upper Pier Avenue, from Valley Drive west to Hermosa Avenue All Lower Pier Avenue, from Hermosa Avenue west to The Strand 16 Palm Trees Hermosa Avenue, from Herondo Street to 35th Street All Page 1078 of 1126 30A Note: 1. All palm trees will be trimmed to a 180° (degrees) cut and will be skinned as needed once per year. 2. All other trees will be trimmed, laced, sized, and shaped once per year. 3. All quantities are approximate. c. Tree Removal The Contractor shall remove all dead, and trees as directed. This activity shall be part of the contract price and not considered extra work. The City requires the Contractor to provide a Certified Arborist report before removing any trees. d. Tree Fertilization Palm trees in the downtown area and the medians on Hermosa Avenue are to be fertilized 4 times per year. Page 1079 of 1126 APPROVE FIRST AMENDMENT TO MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ON-CALL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES WITH MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC. MARCH 24, 2026 Page 1080 of 1126 Background May 24, 2022, Council awarded a 4- year agreement to Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. Contract expires June 30, 2026. Option to extend 1 additional year. Scope includes landscape maintenance and tree care. Page 1081 of 1126 Discussion Staff solicited and negotiated new rates with Merchants. Increases to cover higher labor costs, cost of materials, arborist services, and cost of tree removals. All other line items increased at 3%. Proposed increase in total base contract amount by $623,663, and the total contract amount from $2,173,789 to $2,797,452. Seeking increase in annual project contingency from $65,000 to $100,000. Page 1082 of 1126 Discussion Staff is actively reviewing and updating the scope of work for tree care and landscape services. New Requests for Proposals (RFP) are anticipated soon. Page 1083 of 1126 Recommendations 1.Determine First Amendment to Maintenance Services with Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15378 (b)(5) (administrative activities); 2.Approve First Amendment to agreement with Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. for On-call Landscape Maintenance Services, extending contract term to June 30, 2027, increasing total base contract amount by $623,663, from $2,173,789 to $2,797,452; 3.Authorize Director of Public Works to increase annual project contingency from $65,000 to $100,000 per year for Fiscal Year (FY) 26-27; and 4.Authorize City Manager to execute the proposed amendment, approve minor non-substantive modifications if necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk attesting to the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney. Page 1084 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 10 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PD-007 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON THE COST EVAULATION AND STAFFING MODELS TO INCREASE PUBLIC SAFETY PRESENCE ON THE STRAND, BEACH, AND PARKS Informational items are for discussion only. No action will be taken. A Council majority may request an action item to return at a future meeting. (Police Chief Landon Phillips) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive an informational report on the cost evaluation and staffing models to increase public safety presence on the Strand, the beach, and City parks, and provide direction, if so desired. Executive Summary: As directed by City Council, staff presents this informational report containing four different options to boost the City of Hermosa Beach’s public safety presence on the Strand, beach, and its parks. Options include overtime assignments to current personnel, utilizing contracted code enforcement officers, the appropriation of a Park Ranger position, and making no changes to its current operations. Support from a majority of Council would be needed for an action item to return at a future meeting. Background: The Hermosa Beach Strand is a heavily utilized public space shared by pedestrians, cyclists, skaters, and visitors throughout the year. An ongoing concern raised by residents involves the operation of electric bicycles (e-bikes), particularly complaints regarding speeding and reckless riding behavior that may pose safety risks to pedestrians. Under the current Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 12.20.230, any wheeled equipment operated under electrical power is prohibited on the Strand, though they are permitte d if operated solely by pedal power. This policy reflects a compromise intended to balance access and safety; however, it has also created practical enforcement challenges. Determining whether an e-bike is being powered electrically versus pedaled can be subjective, momentary, and difficult to clearly articulate, particularly in contested enforcement situations or administrative hearings. Page 1085 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 10 The Hermosa Beach Police Department (HBPD) has addressed Strand-related issues through periodic enforcement operations and directed patrols, focusing on education, warnings, and selective citation. While these efforts have produced short -term compliance, maintaining constant patrol presence on the Strand is not an efficient use of sworn police resources, given broader citywide public-safety demands. Additionally, while resident complaints indicate quality-of-life and safety concerns, there is limited data supporting the need for daily or continuous enforcement on the Strand. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description October 28, 2025 Informational Item requested by Councilmember Ray Jackson and Mayor Pro Tem Detoy for assessment of cost, staffing, operational requirements for the Police Department to establish a more consistent and visible presence along the Strand, beach, and parks. Designated officers focused on visibility, proactive engagement, education, and enforcement in our most heavily used public spaces. December 9, 2025 Informational Item requested by Mayor Rob Saemann and Councilmember Michael Keegan for discussion of contract officers as discussed at the Safety Forum. January 27, 2026 Informational Item requested by Councilmember Dean Francois and Councilmember Michael Keegan Discussion of Police Department resources that have been devoted to safety on the Strand and plan for future allocation of these resources on the Strand. Analysis: As part of the regular weekly operations, the Police Department focuses enforcement efforts in impacted areas throughout the City based on crime and traffic collision data. In the last several years, the Police Department has done multiple directed enforcement operations focusing on e-bikes throughout the City, and at times on the Strand specifically. In 2025, HBPD conducted 21 traffic enforcement operations. Twelve (12) of those operations were staffed by officers who were working their regular shift and/or overtime. Nine (9) of those operations were funded by Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grants and officers worked on an overtime basis. During these operations, officers issued 267 citations, impounded 10 vehicles, and impounded 11 e -bikes. Eleven (11) of the total operations included e-bike enforcement which included enforcement on the Strand. From January 1, 2026, through March 10, 2026, HBPD conducted 17 traffic enforcement operations. Seven (7) of those operations were staffed with officers who were working their regular shifts and four (4) of those operations had officers who were working overtime. Six (6) of these operations were funded by OTS grants and officers worked on Page 1086 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 10 an overtime basis. Nine (9) of these operations were specific to e -bike enforcement on the Strand. During those 17 traffic enforcement operations, officers issued 167 citation s and impounded 2 e-bikes. 105 of those citations were issued for bike and e -bike violations on the Strand. HBPD has reviewed several enforcement options to address concerns raised by Councilmembers and the community. While there are concerns in public areas, such as the beach and parks, the emphasis is for enforcement on the Strand. As Police Officers and Community Service Officers (CSOs) are busy with regular duties throughout the city, it would be a disservice to redirect those resources to focus on the Strand and other public spaces. In response, staff presents four different proposals, analyzing the benefits a nd drawbacks of each to help combat these concerns. The first option would be to utilize Hermosa Beach Police Officers and CSOs on an overtime basis to be dedicated to engagement, education and enforcement in public areas. A second option would be to hire contract Code Enforcement Officers who would be dedicated to assigned areas, with a specific objective. The third option would be for the City to authorize the appropriation of a Park Ranger position who would be dedicated to the Strand, beach, and parks. A Park Ranger would dedicate their time to these specific community concerns without taking other staff away from their regular duties. Option 4 would have HBPD continue to deploy resources based on crime and traffic collision data to areas with the greate st need. Enforcement of e-bikes would continue on the Strand and through the City with periodic enforcement operations. Options for Council Consideration: Option 1: Police Officers and Community Service Officers on an Overtime Basis Pros Effective Strand e-bike enforcement depends on professionalism, consistency, and accountability. While CSOs and sworn police officers differ in authority, both operate within the same organizational, policy, and accountability framework established by the Hermosa Beach Police Department (HBPD) and the City of Hermosa Beach. This shared foundation ensures enforcement efforts are uniform, transparent, consistent, and defensible. Both CSOs and sworn police officers meet rigorous agency standards and operate as integrated members of the Police Department. Both positions are familiar with recurring Strand enforcement challenges, seasonal trends, congestion patterns, problem locations, and community expectations. All enforcement is conducted under HBPD policies and procedures, City of Hermosa Beach municipal codes, state law, and departmental supervision, certifying uniform application of enforcement standards. Page 1087 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 10 CSOs and sworn police officers operate the same dispatch, radio, documentation, and tracking systems, allowing seamless coordination, and rapid escalation. Both groups utilize department-issued body-worn cameras (BWCs) and standardized reporting platforms to ensure transparency and evidentiary integrity. All personnel receive training in de-escalation, Fourth Amendment protections, and bias-based policing. All personnel hired by the City have completed an extensive background investigation, use department- issued equipment, and are managed by HBPD supervisors. CSOs provide cost-effective, education-focused enforcement that preserves sworn staff for priority calls. CSOs have the authority to issue administrative citations when appropriate. When using sworn police officers, they have full enforcement authority, strong deterrence, and operational flexibility. Cons When using CSOs, they have limited authority in escalating encounters and need to rely on sworn officers for safety. When using sworn police officers, there is a higher cost, sustainability concerns, and a potential over-policing perception. In addition, there is also a possibility of overtime fatigue for police officers and CSOs. Staffing extra enforcement on an overtime basis will be difficult to maintain over an extended period of time. To mitigate this fatigue, staff proposes a rotating, staggered overtime approach that can be shared by all personnel. Half of the shifts will be available to police officers, and the other half of the shifts will be available to CSOs. The days and hours of the overtime shifts will rotate to allow all police officers and CSOs to share the available overtime shifts. Option 2: Contract Code Enforcement Officers Pros Using contract code enf orcement officers (CEOs) has potential benefits to the City of Hermosa Beach. Contract CEOs would have a dedicated focus on Strand -related municipal violations without diverting police officers, CSOs, or existing City code enforcement staff. They would have the ability to issue Notices to Appear and administrative citations, including misdemeanor-level municipal code violations. Contract CEOs would conduct foot patrol on the Strand, beach, and park areas where vehicle access is limited. In addition, their presence increases visibility that may enhance voluntary compliance and education, particularly during peak usage periods. Cons The use of contract code enforcement services presents several important challenges and risks that would require careful evaluation. Contract CEOs have authority and enforcement limitations. They cannot conduct traffic stops and have limited mobility Page 1088 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 10 compared to sworn police officers. Uncooperative or escalating situations would require police response, potentially reducing anticipated resource savings. Additionally, misdemeanor enforcement requires formal reporting through report writing systems such as Mark43. Access to these systems raises questions regarding permissions for other police department systems, CLETS (records and license checks) admission, evidence handling, and whether certain violations would escalate to Private -Persons Arrests (PPAs), including who would be considered the arresting officer or witness. Utilizing contract CEOs would create challenges with training, supervision and consistency. Contract staff have varying levels of training, particularly related to Fourth Amendment considerations, civil rights, unlawful detentions, and avoiding selective or biased enforcement. Inconsistent staffing and turnover may result in different personnel rotating through the Strand, limiting continuity and institutional knowledge. Contract personnel may be unfamiliar with local community norms, expectations, and historical context, which can impact public interactions. Clear determination is needed regarding who provides day-to-day supervision and performance oversight. There would be additional challenges with coordination and communication. Access to confidential law enforcement information, such as CLETS, will require additional training and clearance by contract enforcement personnel. Integration with existing dispatch and patrol operations would need to be defined, including whether contract staff would respond to calls for service or operate independently. Communication protocols between contract personnel and sworn staff would be essential to ensure safety and consistency. There are concerns about liability, oversight and administrative impacts. The City would likely retain liability for enforcement actions, supervision, training adequacy, and civil rights compliance. Determination would be needed regarding: Managing court appearances and associated costs Overseeing complaints, use-of-force allegations, and human resources matters Determining if contract staff are fully subject to City and Police Department policies Public records retention and disclosure obligations must be clearly addresse d, including whether contract-generated records are retained by the City and subject to public records requests. Implementation will require meet-and-confer discussions with applicable bargaining units. Meet-and-confer discussions can be a lengthy process and may take several months or more. Option 3: Park Ranger Pros Page 1089 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 6 of 10 Creating a full-time Park Ranger position would provide the City of Hermosa Beach with a dedicated, specialized resource focused on public spaces including the Strand, beach, and City parks. Unlike contract personnel, a Park Ranger would be a City employee operating under HBPD’s authority and assigned within the Community Services Division. This structure provides clear accountability, continuity, and alignment with City policies and enforcement standards. A Park Ranger would retain enforcement authority pursuant to California Penal Code §832 and would be authorized to enforce Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) violations. This authority provides clarity in enforcement actions and reduces many of the limitations associated with contract personnel. As a City employee, the Park Ranger would utilize established City systems for report writing and access to confidential law enforcement information. The Park Ranger would adhere to evidence handling protocols and comply with body-worn camera policies. With a dedicated focus on the Strand, beach, and park-related issues, the role would collaboratively work with other City departments to address quality-of-life concerns in public spaces. Over time, the position would build institutional knowledge and familiarity with the City and its expectations while providing consistent visibility and a stewardship presence in high-traffic recreational areas. A Park Ranger position may enhance voluntary compliance through consiste nt engagement and education, while providing a structured enforcement option when necessary. As a specialized role, the position could focus on proactive problem -solving in high-use areas rather than periodic reactive enforcement operations. Cons The creation of a full-time Park Ranger position would require further fiscal and operational analysis prior to implementation. As a City employee, this position would involve salary, benefits, medical costs, training, equipment, uniforms, and potential vehicle expenses. These associated costs would require a long-term budget commitment given current budget constraints and exceed hourly contract staffing rates. Unlike a model dedicated solely to the Strand, a Park Ranger would likely be responsible for multiple public spaces, including parks and beach areas. As a result, coverage would not be exclusive to the Strand and deployment priorities may shift based on seasonal demand or City needs. As with any enforcement role, the City would retain responsibility for supervision, policy compliance, complaint investigation, use-of-force review, and public records retention. Clear operational guidelines would be necessary to ensure consistency and avoid duplication of duties with existing personnel. Option 4: No Changes Page 1090 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 7 of 10 Pros Continuing current operations allows the Police Department to maintain a data -driven and flexible enforcement model. Resources can be directed to areas of greatest need based on crime trends, traffic collisions, seasonal demand, and community concern s, while preserving staffing for priority calls for service and other citywide policing responsibilities. This option avoids additional personnel costs or long-term financial commitments associated with creating new positions or contracting services. Enf orcement efforts can continue through periodic directed patrols and Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grant-funded operations, allowing the City to leverage external funding when available. HBPD already has established procedures, training, supervision, and reporting systems in place for traffic and e-bike enforcement. Officers are familiar with enforcement challenges on the Strand and can respond to concerns as they arise without implementing new programs or staffing models. Cons This approach does not provide a dedicated enforcement presence on the Strand or in other public spaces where community concerns are frequently raised. Enforcement efforts remain periodic rather than continuous, which may not meet expectations for consistent visibility. Without dedicated staffing, enforcement activity must compete with other citywide priorities and calls for service, which may limit the ability to sustain focused Strand enforcement during peak periods. Additionally, the absence of a specialized resource m ay reduce opportunities for consistent education, engagement with the community, and proactive visibility with e-bike riders. Directed enforcement operations are effective but tend to be short-term rather than ongoing. Maintaining current operations may also lead to continued community perception that the City is not doing enough to address e-bike concerns, even when enforcement activity is occurring. Fiscal Impact: For Option 1 and Option 2, staff recommends dedicating 32 hours per week. Option 3 would be a full-time position which would be 40 hours per week. Option 1: Two Police Officers and Two CSO’s (8 hours each) for 32 Hours per week Option 1 would utilize 32 hours of overtime from $103,876 to a maximum total estimated cost up to $141,720. This would be comprised of 16 hours covered between two Police Officers. The other 16 hours would be covered between two CSOs. The 2 Police Officers and 2 CSO’s would work 8 hours each, twice per week for a total of 32 hours per week. Page 1091 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 8 of 10 The minimum and maximum estimated cost would increase from $106,996 to $145,970 for the upcoming 2026-27 Fiscal Year due to the updated salary schedules effective July 2026. The minimum and maximum total estimated cost is based on assuming a Police Officer to Police Sergeant and CSO from the bottom of the salary range to the top of the salary range for a more conservative estimate. The total estimated cost includes City employer payroll tax expenditures, however actual costs is anticipated to be lower than the maximum since it is unlikely that personnel at the top of the salary range will fill every overtime assignment. Advantages of Option 1 is it leverages existing trained personnel and equipment, eliminating startup costs and service delays. however it does not create long-term liabilities such as pension or healthcare obligations. Additionally, overtime provides budget flexibility, allowing staffing levels to be adjusted based on seasonal demand and workforce availability. Option 2: Two Contract Code Enforcement Officers (CEO’s) for 32 Hours per week The Contract CEO’s hourly cost annualized is estimated to be $133,120. However, the annualized cost does not include other potential contract costs such as potential additional equipment, vehicle, and technology expenses that narrows the overall savings. Option 3: Additional full-time Park Ranger to be budgeted for 40 hours per week Creating an additional full-time permanent Park Ranger position is estimated to cost $131,620 comprised of an estimated annual salary of $93,204 and benefits of $38,416. This annualized estimate is based on using the median salary (between Step 3 and Step 4) of the neighboring City of Manhattan Beach’s Salary Schedule of the Parks Services Enforcement Officer (Park Ranger). Costs are expected to increase with ongoing salary growth, benefits, and pension obligations that extend well beyond the initial year. Other anticipated personnel outfitting costs may include the purchase of portable radios and radio system access, body-worn camera hardware and licensing, specialty equipment, and a beach-capable vehicle to operate on the sand. The outfitting costs is estimated to be $65,248. Option 4: No changes No changes would have no fiscal impact since it would utilize the current Police Department operational budget for public safety presence. Page 1092 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 9 of 10 Options Cost Analysis Category Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Staffing Model Overtime of 2 Police Officers + 2 CSO’s Contract for 2 CEO’s Add Park Ranger Position Hours per Week 32 hours 32 hours 40 hours Direct Labor Costs $103,876 - $141,720 $133,120 $93,204 Benefits Included None $38,416 Total Labor Costs $103,876 - $141,720 $133,120 $131,620 Outfitting Costs (Tactical Gear, Body Worn Camera and Vehicle) Not Applicable TBD (Potentially Additional) $65,248 Total Estimated Annual Costs $103,876 - $141,720 $133,120 $196,868 *Option 4 not presented due to no fiscal impact. Recommendation: If Council desires to bring back an action item at a future meeting, Staff recommends Option 1: utilizing Police Officers and CSOs on an overtime basis for additional presence, education and enforcement in public spaces, with an emphasis on the Strand. Shifts would rotate among Police Officers and CSOs and vary in days and hours to reduce overtime fatigue and promote equitable scheduling. A tiered model ensures effective, sustainable enforcement aligned with community expectations. Staff recommends implementing Option 1 for a period of six (6) months to assess if this approach would improve safety and address community concerns. Since February 2026, HBPD has already assigned dedicated police officers and CSOs to enforce regulations on bikes and e-bikes on the Strand on an overtime basis (Option 1). This was a direct response to growing community demand for more enforcement on the Strand. Adjustments were made by HBPD to allow for additional Strand enforcement. In addition, staff would conduct a pre-survey to measure how the community feels about safety on the Strand and concerns of e-bikes. After the six (6) month period, staff would conduct a post-survey to measure any changes from the community. Staff would then return to City Council to discuss any findings and seek further direction. Page 1093 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 10 of 10 Respectfully Submitted by: Joanne Loeza, Management Analyst Concur: Eric Cahalan, Police Captain Concur: Landon Phillips, Police Chief Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 1094 of 1126 INFORMATION REPORT ON THE COST EVALUATION AND STAFFING MODELS TO INCREASE PUBLIC SAFETY PRESENCE ON THE STRAND, BEACH, AND PARKS March 24, 2026 Page 1095 of 1126 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •As directed by City Council, staff presents this information report containing four different options to boost the City of Hermosa Beach’s public safety presence on the Strand, beach, and its parks. Options include overtime assignments to current personnel, utilizing contracted code enforcement officers, the appropriation of a Park Ranger position, and making no changes to its current operations. Page 1096 of 1126 BACKGROUND •The Strand is a high traffic shared space where ongoing resident concerns focus on e-bike speeding and unsafe riding behavior that may endanger pedestrians. •HBMC 12.20.230: any wheeled equipment operated under electrical power is prohibited on the Strand, though permitted if operated solely by pedal power •HBPD uses periodic enforcement and education efforts that yield temporary compliance, but sustained daily enforcement is not efficient use of resources and not currently supported by data Page 1097 of 1126 ANALYSIS •HBPD focuses enforcement efforts in impacted areas based on crime and traffic collision data. •2025: 21 operations (12 regular/overtime, 9 grant-funded); 267 citations, 21 impounds (10 vehicles, 11 e-bikes); 11 operations included e-bike enforcement •2026 (Jan 1-Mar 10):17 operations; 167 citations; 2 e-bike impounds; 105 citations issued for bike/e-bike violations on the Strand; 9 operations focused on Strand e-bike enforcement Page 1098 of 1126 ANALYSIS •Redirecting officers and CSOs to the Strand would impact citywide service and is not recommended •Option 1: Overtime staffing (Officers/CSOs) for education and enforcement •Option 2: Contract Code Enforcement Officers for focused deployment •Option 3: Dedicated Park ranger position •Option 4: Continue current data-driven enforcement with periodic e-bike operations Page 1099 of 1126 PROS CONS •CSOs have limited authority, need to rely on officers for escalating encounters •Possible overtime fatigue •Potential over-policing perception OPTION 1: OVERTIME •Enforcement efforts are uniformed and consistent •Familiar with HBPD policies, training, and community expectations •Officers and CSOs operate on same dispatch, radio, and standardized report platforms Page 1100 of 1126 PROS CONS •Authority and enforcement limitations •Access to HBPD reporting systems •Challenges with training, supervision, and consistency •Liability, oversight, and administrative concerns OPTION 2: CONTRACT OFFICERS •Dedicated focus on municipal violations, without diverting City personnel •Ability to issue Notices to Appear and admin citations •Increase visibility may enhance compliance and education Page 1101 of 1126 PROS CONS •As a City employee, benefits, medical costs, training, equipment/uniforms will need to be accounted for o Long term budget commitment •Coverage wouldn’t be exclusive to the Strand; deployment priorities may shift based on demand and City needs OPTION 3: PARK RANGER POSITION •Dedicated City employee focused on public spaces •Retain enforcement under CA PC 832 and be under HBPD’s authority •Over time, they would build institutional knowledge and work with City departments to address quality-of-life concerns Page 1102 of 1126 PROS CONS •No dedicated enforcement presence on the Strand or in public spaces •Strand enforcement must compete with other citywide priorities and calls for service •Can lead to continued community perception that City isn’t doing enough to address concerns OPTION 4: NO CHANGES •Allows HBPD to maintain a data-driven and flexible enforcement model •Resources can be directed to areas of greatest need based on multiple factors •Avoids personnel costs or long-term financial commitments Page 1103 of 1126 FISCAL IMPACT Options Cost Analysis Category Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Staffing Model Overtime of 2 Police Officers + 2 CSO’s Contract for 2 CEO’s Add Park Ranger Position Hours per Week 32 hours 32 hours 40 hours Direct Labor Costs $103,876 - $141,720 $133,120 $93,204 Benefits Included None $38,416 Total Labor Costs $103,876 - $141,720 $133,120 $131,620 Outfitting Costs (Tactical Gear, Body Worn Camera and Vehicle) Not Applicable TBD (Potentially Additional) $65,248 Total Estimated Annual Costs $103,876 - $141,720 $133,120 $196,868 *Option 4 not presented due to no fiscal impact.Page 1104 of 1126 STAFF RECOMMENDATION – OPTION 1 •Shifts would rotate among officers and CSOs and vary in days and hours to reduce overtime fatigue and promote equitable scheduling •Trial period of six (6) months to assess option •Since Feb. 2026, HBPD has already assigned dedicated personnel to enforce regulation on the Strand on an OT basis •Additionally, staff would conduct a pre and post survey to measure how community feels about safety on the Strand Page 1105 of 1126 RECOMMENDED ACTION •Staff recommends City Council receive an information report on the cost evaluation and staffing models to increase public safety presence on the Strand, the beach, and city parks, and provide direction, if so desired. Page 1106 of 1126 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-CMO-017 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information. The tentative future agenda provides a preliminary preview of topics planned for discussion at upcoming City Council meetings over a specified period, typically the next three months. The items listed in this document are "tentatively" scheduled, meaning they are subject to change and should not be considered final until the official agenda for each meeting is posted. This document is a work in progress and offers a glimpse into the City's priorities and planned discussions, allowing stakeholders to anticipate and prepare for potential topics of interest. Key Features of a Tentative Future Agenda Document: 1. Tentative Schedule: Each agenda item is assigned a tentative date, indicating when it is expected to be discussed. These dates are provisional and may be adjusted based on various factors. 2. Work in Progress: The document is continuously updated as new items emerge, priorities shift, or additional information becomes available. This flexibility ensures City Council can address the most pressing issues in a timely manner. 3. Transparency and Communication: By publishing a tentative future agenda, the City aims to maintain transparency with residents, businesses, and other stakeholders. It helps the community stay informed about potential topics of discussion and provides an opportunity for public engagement and preparation. 4. Fluid Scheduling: The scheduling of agenda items is fluid until the official agenda for a specific City Council meeting is posted. Changes can occur due to various reasons, such as new developments, additional preparatory work required, or changes in workload or priority. Attachment: Tentative Future Agenda Items Page 1107 of 1126 March 18, 2026 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 24, 2025 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS APRIL 14, 2026 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATECLOSED SESSION APRIL 14, 2026 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE SERVICES AND MCCORMICK AMBULANCE JULY - DEC 2025 SEMI- ANNUAL REVIEW AND RECOGNIZING SEPTEMBER AS NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS MONTH RECOGNIZING APRIL AS EARTH MONTH AND APRIL 22 AS EARTH DAY CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Administrative Services Director Ongoing First Amendment to Agreements with TRB & Associates, Inc., and Willdan Engineering for Professional Services for On Call Development Plan Review and Staff Augmentation Services Community Development Director Staff Request Mar. 18, 2026 PUBLIC HEARINGS Approval of Impact Level III New Special Event – After Dark Tour LA 2026 Parks and Recreation Director Council Direction Mar. 10, 2026 Introduction of Ordinance to Amend Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Chapter 12.30 Special Events on Public Property and the Master Fee Schedule to Establish a Special Event Per-Vendor Daily Fee Parks and Recreation Director Staff Request Feb. 17, 2026 Resolution Adopting Fees from Fee Study Update Administrative Services Director Staff Request Feb. 17, 2026 MUNICIPAL MATTERS Dog Park Proposal Review (supported by City Council) Parks and Recreation Director Council Direction Mar 11, 2025 Consideration of Request by Hermosa Beach Little League to Advance Improvements to Clark Field Public Works Director Staff Request Feb. 3, 2026 Consideration of Adding Another Accessible Beach Mat, Modifications to Existing Layout, and Potential for Outside Funding for a Permanent Installation (supported by: Francois, Saemann and Jackson) Public Works Director Council Direction Aug. 26, 2025 Award of Professional Service Agreements for On-Call Environmental Monitoring and Testing Services Public Works Director Staff Request Feb. 25, 2026 Award of Professional Services Agreement for California Environmental Quality Control Act (CEQA) Project Analysis and other Environmental Services for the Public Works City Yard Public Works Director Staff Request Feb. 25, 2026 Award of Professional Services Agreements for Vehicle Upfitting Administrative Services Director Staff Request Feb. 17, 2026 Informational Item to consider bid package for St. Patrick’s Day Parade, Memorial Day weekend Fiesta, and Labor Day weekend Fiesta events. (supported by: Saemann and Keegan) Parks and Recreation Director Council Direction Feb. 3, 2026 Informational Item to discuss identification requirements for alcohol-serving establishments, and if feasible, include input from the Alcoholic Beverage Control, and include available technology that is available to combat fake identifications (supported by: Jackson and Detoy) Community Development Director/Planning Commission Council Direction Sept. 9, 2025 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Police Crime Statistics for February 2026 Police Chief Ongoing Action minutes of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting of March 3, 2026 Parks and Recreation Director Ongoing Parking Citation and Revenue Report – March 2026 Senior Management Analyst Ongoing Page 1108 of 1126 2 APRIL 28, 2026 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE STUDY SESSION: FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 BUDGET APRIL 28, 2026 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS RECOGNIZING U.S. WOMEN’S NATIONAL ICE HOCKEY TEAM HEAD COACH JOHN WROBLEWSKI CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Administrative Services Director Ongoing Cash Balance Report for January 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing Revenue Report, Expenditure Report, and CIP Report by Project for January 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing City Treasurer’s Report for March 2026 City Treasurer Ongoing Capital Improvement Program Status Report Public Works Director Ongoing Adopt an Ordinance to Amend Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Chapter 12.30 Special Events on Public Property Parks and Recreation Director Council Direction Apr. 14, 2026 MUNICIPAL MATTERS Calling and Giving Notice and Certain Other Resolutions Necessary for Holding the General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026 City Clerk Election Years (No later than June) Resolution establishing new category and fee for outdoor dining encroachments Environmental Programs Manager Council Direction Mar. 10, 2026 HCD Annual Progress Report on Housing Community Development Director Staff Request Feb. 11, 2026 Parking In-Lieu Fee Report Administrative Services Director Staff Request Mar. 16, 2026 Informational Item to consider a letter of support for Assembly Bill 1942 (Bauer-Kahan) which proposes mandatory registration and special license plates for Class 2 and Class 3 electric bicycles through the DMV. (supported by: Saemann and Keegan) Senior Management Analyst Council Direction Mar. 10, 2026 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Los Angeles County Fire and Ambulance Monthly Report for February 2026 Emergency Management Coordinator Ongoing Page 1109 of 1126 3 MAY 12, 2026 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION MAY 12, 2026 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS RECOGNIZING MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS MONTH CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Administrative Services Director Ongoing PUBLIC HEARINGS Zoning Code Update - Administrative Procedures Community Development Director Staff Request Jul. 23, 2025 MUNICIPAL MATTERS Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget - Department Presentations Administrative Services Director Annual FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Police Crime Statistics for March 2026 Police Chief Ongoing Action minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of March 17, 2026 Community Development Director Ongoing Action minutes of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting of April 16, 2026 Parks and Recreation Director Ongoing Parking Citation and Revenue Report – April 2026 Senior Management Analyst Ongoing MAY 26, 2026 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION MAY 26, 2026 @ 6:00 PM CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Administrative Services Director Ongoing Cash Balance Report for February 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing Revenue Report, Expenditure Report, and CIP Report by Project for February 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing City Treasurer’s Report for April 2026 City Treasurer Ongoing Capital Improvement Program Status Report Public Works Director Ongoing MUNICIPAL MATTERS Adoption of resolutions regarding the Engineer’s Report and setting June 23, 2026, for the public hearing for the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District FY 2026–2027. Public Works Director Annual Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget - Department Presentations (Continued from May 12, 2026 if needed) Administrative Services Director Annual Award of contract for preparing a vulnerability assessment and sea level rise adaptation plan (between $600K - $700K) Environmental Programs Manager Staff Request Mar. 9, 2026 Endorsement of Arakelian Enterprises, Inc (DBA Athens Services) Request for an Annual Rate Adjustment to the Maximum Rate for Solid Waste Services Environmental Programs Manager Staff Request Mar. 16, 2026 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Los Angeles County Fire and Ambulance Monthly Report for March 2026 Emergency Management Coordinator Ongoing Action minutes of the Public Works Commission Meeting of March 18, 2026 Public Works Director Ongoing Action minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of April 21, 2026 Community Development Director Ongoing Page 1110 of 1126 4 THURSDAY, MAY 28, 2026 @ 6:00 PM STUDY SESSION: FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PENDING NEW ITEMS STATUS / TENTATIVE MEETING DATE (Updated 12/29/25) Approval of the Municipal Lease Policy Initiated by: Staff Request Jun. 12, 2018 Parks and Recreation Director Awaiting professional building assessment of the Kiwanis Building, Rotary Building, and Lawn Bowling Club to determine the level of maintenance, repairs, and future upgrades that may be needed and required by the City. Landscape and Street Lighting District Assessment Adjustment (mail-in election authorization) Initiated by: Council Direction Jul. 9, 2019 Public Works Director Pending staff availability. If council agrees to advance the adjustment, it will need to go to a citywide ballot in compliance with Proposition 218. Emergency Services Municipal Code Chapter 2.56 Update Emergency Management Coordinator Waiting for State to review proposed language changes Consideration of licensing agreement/fees for use of City logo Initiated by: Council Direction Jun. 9, 2020 City Attorney The City will develop a licensing agreement for commercial uses of the City logo as part of a comprehensive Administrative Memorandum (AM) on City Branding and Logo Use by City Staff. City staff will begin drafting the AM after finalizing the City’s style guide and filing its “Intent to Use” trademark application for the City logo with the USPTO. As part of developing a Licensing Agreement for the Commercial Use of the City Logo, staff will establish a process for reviewing and handling these requests. This process will likely include the negotiation of royalties and as well as the preparation of a staff report to obtain Council approval to enter into the agreement. Only after the City receives the issuance of a Notice of Allowance from the USPTO can it begin approving applications for commercial uses of the logo. Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission Volleyball Court Use Subcommittee was formed to review all aspects of the beach volleyball courts located in the residential area Initiated: 2021 Parks and Recreation Director To be completed in the first quarter of 2026. PLAN Hermosa 5-year check-in on milestones (Supported by Massey, Campbell, Armato, Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction October 26, 2021 Community Development The next update to City Council will be in 2026 Page 1111 of 1126 5 Director/Environmental Program Manager Consideration of rules that would govern operation of off-sale alcohol establishments in downtown and consideration of queuing for on -sale alcohol establishments. (supported by Massey, Saemann and Detoy) Initiated by: Council Direction June 13, 2023 Community Development/Police Chief/Deputy City Manager Ordinance to be established to address items. Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey and review of provisions in California Assembly Bill 43 that are anticipated to become effective on or about June 30, 2024. Initiated by: Unanimous Council Direction July 25, 2023 Public Works Director Pending staffing availability and completion of other previously requested future agenda items. Targeting Summer 2026. Request Public Works Commission to review fines and other consequences involved with illegal tree removal and return to Council as an action item for discussion and deliberation. (supported by Saemann, Francois, Detoy) Initiated by: Council Direction August 13, 2024 Public Works Director Pending staffing availability and completion of other previously requested future agenda items. Explore Best Practices for Undergrounding. (supported by: Detoy, Saemann, and Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction November 12, 2024 Public Works Director Pending staffing availability and completion of other previously requested future agenda items. Staff will also need to request funding in the future budget cycle to support bringing in appropriate consulting expertise on this item. Refer the public pool discussion to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission for review prior to City Council. (supported by Saemann, Detoy, and Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction June 24, 2025 Parks and Recreation Director Pending Commission Review Hermosa Beach Lawn Bowling Club Operations (supported by Jackson, Detoy, and Keegan) Initiated by: Council Direction June 24, 2025 Parks and Recreation Director Under Legal Review Consider adding another accessible mat, extending the "T" to the water line, and seek grant funding to study a permanent solution to the current accessible mat setup. Public Works Director Pending staffing availability and completion of other previously requested future agenda items. Targeting early Spring 2026. Agendize discussion on Rosenberg’s Rules of Order and Robert’s Rules of Order at the next City Council Retreat (supported by: Detoy and Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction September 9, 2025 City Manager The next City Council Retreat will be scheduled once a permanent City Manager is appointed Informational Item for Public Works Commission to study maximizing and expanding the street parking inventory through the analysis of the City's red curb standard to include studying golfcart parking spaces for reduced streets and studying the Driveway Parking Permit Program. (supported by: Jackson and Saemann) Initiated by: Council Direction September 9, 2025 Public Works Director Pending staffing availability and completion of other previously requested future agenda items. Informational Item to review the feasibility of collecting Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) for short-term vacation rentals that are out of compliance, and of collecting unpaid fines from illegal short -term vacation rentals. (supported by: Jackson and Saemann) Initiated by: Council Direction September 9, 2025 Administrative Services Director Staff will come back to Council in the next few months for an update. Informational Item to delineate available options for licensing, registration, or other regulatory tools to support e-bike safety and compliance. (supported by: Jackson and Saemann) Initiated by: Council Direction December 9, 2025 City Attorney/Police Chief Consideration to increase the City's contract threshold limits including the City Manager's signing authority and the guidelines for consent calendar approval. (supported by: Detoy, Keegan, and Francois) Initiated by: Council Direction March 10, 2026 Administrative Services Director Page 1112 of 1126 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2026 (Regular Meeting Times: Closed Sessions at 5:00 PM and Open Sessions at 6:00 PM) Page 1 of 2 JANUARY 13, 2026 JANUARY 27, 2026 FEBRUARY 3, 2026 FEBRUARY 24, 2026 (ELECTION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE) MARCH 10, 2026 MARCH 24, 2026 APRIL 14, 2026 APRIL 28, 2026 FY 2026–2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY SESSION MAY 12, 2026 MAY 26, 2026 THURSDAY, MAY 28, 2026 FY 2026–2027 BUDGET STUDY SESSION JUNE 9, 2026 (ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026–2027 BUDGET) JUNE 23, 2026 NO MEETING JULY 14, 2026 (DARK) JULY 28, 2026 January 5–7, 2026: CCCA Legislative Tour in Sacramento, CA May 14–17, 2026 (Tentative Dates): CCCA Annual Municipal Seminar July 9–12, 2026: ICA Summer Seminar June 4–7, 2026: U.S. Conference of Mayors Annual Meeting in Long Beach, CA January 15, 2026: State of the City Address January 21–23, 2026 (Sacramento): League of California Cities New Mayors & Council Members Academy May 7–8, 2026: SCAG Regional Conference and General Assembly in Palm Desert, CA February 9-13, 2026: HBCSD Ski Week February 20-22, 2026: ICA Winter Seminar in Santa Barbara, CA January 28–30, 2026: U.S. Conference of Mayors Winter Meeting in D.C. February 20-22, 2026: ICA Winter Seminar in Santa Barbara, CA June 12, 2026: HBCSD Summer Break Begins CIP Study Session in place of Regular Meeting Summer Vacation Season Passover begins at sunset on April 1, 2026 and ends at nightfall on April 9, 2026 (No work permitted) April 6–10, 2026: HBCSD Spring Break Page 1113 of 1126 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2026 (Regular Meeting Times: Closed Sessions at 5:00 PM and Open Sessions at 6:00 PM) Page 2 of 2 NO MEETING AUGUST 11, 2026 (DARK) AUGUST 25, 2026 SEPTEMBER 8, 2026 SEPTEMBER 22, 2026 OCTOBER 13, 2026 OCTOBER 27, 2026 NOVEMBER 10, 2026 NO MEETING NOVEMBER 24, 2026 (DARK) THURSDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2026 CERTIFICATON OF NOVEMBER 2026 ELECTION, INSTALLATION OF NEW OFFICERS, AND ELECTION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE DECEMBER 8, 2026 NO MEETING DECEMBER 22, 2026 (DARK) Rosh Hashanah begins at sunset on September 11, 2026 and ends at nightfall on September 13, 2026 (No work permitted) Yom Kippur begins at sunset on September 20, 2026 and ends at nightfall on September 21, 2026 (No work permitted) September 4–6, 2026 (Tentative Dates): CCCA Annual Fall Educational Summit Summer Vacation Season Winter Holiday Season Chanukah begins sunset of December 4, 2026 and ends nightfall of December 12, 2026 (work permitted, except Shabbat – Friday evening to Saturday evening) September 23–25, 2026: League of California Cities Annual Conference at Anaheim Convention Center Thanksgiving Week November 11, 2026: Veteran’s Day Holiday November 3, 2026: General Election (Three City Council Seats) Page 1114 of 1126 CITY MANAGER UPDATE March 24, 2026 Page 1115 of 1126 Update for March 24, 2026 •Housing Initiative Court ➢Location: Kelly Courts ➢Time:8:30 am–11:00 am ➢Dates: Jun 17,Jul 22,Aug 26,Sept 23,Oct 21,Nov 18,and Dec 16 •March 31 State Holiday ➢City Hall and Community Center Offices closed. Police and Public Works will remain available. Police non-emergency line is 310-524-2750. ➢Street sweeping and PCH parking enforcement suspended. All other parking regulations remain in effect. ➢Construction activities may proceed ➢Trash will be collected as scheduledPage 1116 of 1126 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES January 21, 2026 Open Session 6:00 PM Council Chambers 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Members Present: Chairperson David Grethen, Vice Chairperson Thor Legvold, Commissioner Kathy Dunbabin, Commissioner Janice Brittain, Commissioner Scott Hayes Staff Present: Public Works Director Joe SanClemente, City Engineer Saad Malim, Associate Engineer Andrew Nguyen, Management Analyst Michael Dell'Amico _____________________________________________________________________ 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Grethen called the Open Session to order at 6:05 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairperson Grethen. 3. ROLL CALL Chairperson Grethen, Vice Chairperson Legvold, Commissioner Brittain, Commissioner Dunbabin, and Commissioner Hayes are Present Andrew Nguyen announced a quorum. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Motion to move Item 13 Future Agenda Items just before Item 15 Adjournment Page 1117 of 1126 2 Moved by: Chairperson David Grethen Seconded by: Commissioner Scott Hayes Ayes (5): Chairperson David Grethen, Vice Chairperson Thor Legvold, Commissioner Kathy Dunbabin, Commissioner Janice Brittain, and Commissioner Scott Hayes Motion Carried 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS Commissioner Brittain Woman's Club fundraiser at The Comedy and Magic Club on Thursday 2/26. A $20 donation provides free admission and the money goes to one of the Women's club charities. 6. PRESENTATIONS None 7. PUBLIC COMMENT Chairperson Grethen opened public comment. The following public comment was provided. In Person Public Comment: None 8. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS 8.a Response to Public Comments/Questions for Clarification None 8.b Brief Announcements None 8.c Reports on liaison or subcommittee roles, activities, or meetings attended. None 8.d Brief comments on matters within subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission. Chairperson Grethen acknowledged an item that was heard on 1/13 City Council meeting regarding the Commissioners Handbook. Item will be brought back to a later City Council meeting for further discussion. 9. CONSENT CALENDAR Moved by: Commissioner Scott Hayes Seconded by: Commissioner Janice Brittain Motion to approve the consent calendar. Page 1118 of 1126 3 Ayes (4): Chairperson David Grethen, Commissioner Kathy Dunbabin, Commissioner Janice Brittain, and Commissioner Scott Hayes Abstained (1): Vice Chairperson Thor Legvold Motion Carried 9.a Action Meeting Minutes for the November 19, 2025 Public Works Commission Meeting 10. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION None 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS None 12. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION None 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS None 14. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT Public Works Director Joe SanClemente announced the following ... 14.a Director's Update Director SanClemente provided an update on the tree replanting in Valley Park and the Greenbelt and throughout the City after the removal of 26 trees and planting of 52 new trees. The item went to the Parks and Rec Commission in October and City Council on 12/9 and they approved the replanting plan. Also on 12/9, City Council has decommissioned the Public Works subcommittee. City Engineer Saad Malim provided an update on upcoming utility project. Had a preconstruction meeting with Cal Water regarding a water main replacement along Aviation Blvd between Aubrey Ct and Corona St and PCH and Prospect Ave. It will include water main replacement on 9th St and 10th St between Owosso Ave and Prospect Ave as well as on Owosso Ave between Aviation Blvd and 9th St. Staff has worked extensively with Cal Water to review their plan and establish a traffic control plan to include CMS message boards to announce to the public the upcoming project which is slated to start Page 1119 of 1126 4 February 9th. Construction hours will be 9am-3pm with anticipated completion in May. Updated pavement replacement includes trench standard detail which calls for full lane replacements on portions of the trench that are asphalt. For concrete restoration, 18 inches outside of the trench needs to be fully restored. Portions of the project will be affecting the pavement moratorium area along Bonnie Brae St and Owosso Ave. Estimate that there will be about 20 feet into each of those streets that Cal Water will need to install a new main line and tie into their old lines and those portions will be fully paved form curb to curb as part of the existing pavement moratorium. Staff has coordinated this work with Cal Water to proceed before the annual pavement CIP project, so once their work is complete the City anticipates repaving all of Aviation Blvd, Commissioner Dunbabin, Commissioner Hayes, and Vice Chairperson Legvold had follow-up questions. Item 14.b.3 Activity Report December 2025 Updated was added 14.b Activity Reports 14.b.1 Activity Report November 2025 14.b.2 Activity Report December 2025 14.b.3 Activity Report December 2025 Updated There was an update on the December activity reports. The service requests section originally presented the amount from a two-month period and it will now show the monthly amount of service requests. 14.c CIP Status Report City Engineer Saad Malim presented the CIP update. CIP 421 Annual Sewer Improvements, CIP 699 Lot C Elevator Modernization, CIP 633 Base 3 Electrical Improvements, and CIP 109 Utility Box Wrappings have all been completed with Notice of Completions being sent out and recorded. Commissioner Dunbabin had follow-up questions. CIP 630 Community Center Gas Repair is slightly delayed due to abatement work required prior to penetrations through the roof. CIP 164 Hermosa Avenue Green Streets, CIP 114 Greenwich Village North Undergrounding, and CIP 685 Real-Time Crime Center are all slated to begin construction soon. Chairperson Grethen had follow-up questions. Page 1120 of 1126 5 CIP 619 Kelly Courts Improvement is making timely progress. Project delayed due to unforeseen conditions such as unknown irrigation and utility lines that needed to be rerouted. Also, half of the court was found to have concrete overlayed with 2 inches of asphalt complicating resurfacing. Due to these unforeseen conditions brought about by the lack of reliable as-built information for our facilities, we will be bringing this to City Council to increase the project contingency. Completion timeline has been updated to the end of March. Real time crime center delayed due to government shutdown and the Buy America requirements of the grant funding. CIP 699 Lot C improvements had a full structure closure on November 26, 2025 due to post tension tendons that support structure found to be broken. Additional PT tendon repair started on December 15, 2025. During the closure, the contractor advanced other structural improvements slated for Phase 2. After CIP project completion, all structural repairs for Lot C will be completed. Also, additional scope was approved at the January 13, 2026 City Council meeting to paint the structure. Anticipated full opening by end of March 2026. Commissioner Dunbabin had a follow-up question. CIP 626 CDBG Sidewalk Improvements, CIP 107 Annual Slurry Seal, and CIP 504 Playground Equipment Replacement are moving towards final design and will be bid and start construction in the coming months Commissioner Hayes had a follow-up question The PCI Pavement Condition Index determines which streets are included in the slurry seal CIP and the annual street improvement CIP. Director Joe SanClemente provided updates on CIP 111 Gateway and Wayfinding Signage which is currently in preliminary design. This includes electronic signage, gateway, and downtown wayfinding signage. At the December 9, 2025 City Council meeting, former mayor Chuck Sheldon and wife Missy made $500,000 donation to advance key elements. A prior $50,000 donation from the Chamber of Commerce in 2014 will also be redirected towards the Gateway and Wayfinding signage project. An electronic sign will require CalTrans, City Council, and Planning Commission approval. Chairperson Grethen had a follow-up question and wants to ensure community engagement on the signage. CIP 615 New City Yard September 9, 2025 RFQ released. Five statements of Qualifications received on October 9, 2025. The City interviewed top firms on November 3, 2025 and on January 13, 2026 City Council awarded the contract to Cumming Management Group for Owner's Representative Services. Page 1121 of 1126 6 The pre-construction phase has an anticipated 2-year duration. The critical path steps in the next 3-6 months include the following: Develop scopes of work and procure consultant for environmental site assessments, begin CEQA analysis and complete initial study, perform initial architectural feasibility assessments and programming of the site to clarify potential costs and timelines, and make recommendations for the project delivery method of Design-Build, Design-Bid-Build, or other delivery methods. Goal is to bring item to City Council this summer. CIP 623 Pier Structural in Final Design. The ongoing structural assessments and cost benefit analysis anticipate $7 million in improvements within 5-7 years. CIP 623 was created to advance the first phase of that which includes $3 million for the urgent repairs with a goal of another phase of repairs in years 3-5. We are currently focused on the 1-2 year repair window requirement for high priority major deck repairs. The challenge is permitting is a lengthy process. Currently working through Army Corp, State Water Board and Coastal Commission. Army Corps and State Water Board have completed their reviews, but still waiting on Coastal Commission. Design is at 75% and have aggressively pursued outside funding applying to over half a dozen grants, however it is extremely competitive and often not available for projects of this scope. There is a section at end of the pier that have been temporarily closed off due to two faulty panels. No reason to believe there are any other safety issues on the pier and will continue to monitor conditions to protect public safety. Chairperson Grethen and Commissioner Hayes had follow-up questions. 15. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:13 p.m. Page 1122 of 1126 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES February 17, 2026 5:00 p.m. Council Chambers 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Members Present: Chairperson Stephen Izant, Vice Chairperson Michael Flaherty, Commissioner Peter Hoffman, Commissioner Greg McNally, Commissioner Kate Hirsh Staff Present: Planning Manager Alexis Oropeza, Assistant Planner Jake Whitney, Senior Office Assistant Holly Honma, Assistant Planner Johnny Case, Community Development Director Alison Becker, Assistant Planner DeDe Tran, Interim City Attorney Sarah Locklin _____________________________________________________________________ 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Stephen Izant called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairperson Izant. 3. ROLL CALL Senior Office Assistant Holly Honma announced a quorum. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Moved by: Commissioner Hoffman Seconded by: Vice Chairperson Flaherty To approve the order of the agenda. Ayes (5): Chairperson Izant, Vice Chairperson Flaherty, Commissioner Hoffman, Commissioner McNally, and Commissioner Hirsh Motion Carried 5. PUBLIC COMMENT In-person public comments: Page 1123 of 1126 2 None Virtual public comments: None 6. CONSENT CALENDAR Moved by: Commissioner Hoffman Seconded by: Vice Chairperson Flaherty To approve the consent calendar. Ayes (5): Chairperson Izant, Vice Chairperson Flaherty, Commissioner Hoffman, Commissioner McNally, and Commissioner Hirsh Motion Carried 6.a ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 2026 - 26-CDD-020 (Administrative Assistant Nancy Blinzler) Moved by: Commissioner Hoffman Seconded by: Vice Chairperson Flaherty To approve the action minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of January 20, 2026. Motion Carried 7. PUBLIC HEARING 7.a LOCATION: 74 PIER AVENUE - 25-CDD-169 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REQUEST TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO MODIFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP25-13/APE25-004) FOR ROBERT'S LIQUOR LOCATED AT 74 PIER AVENUE IN THE DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL ZONE. CEQA: Determine the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. (Assistant Planner Johnny Case & Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne Calderon) Assistant Planner Johnny Case provided a presentation. Vice-Chairperson Flaherty provided comments. Planning Manager Alexis Oropeza provided information. Chairperson Izant opened the Public Hearing. Page 1124 of 1126 3 Commissioner Hoffman provided comments. Chairperson Izant provided comments. Applicant Patrick Boboko provided comments. Chief Landon Phillips provided comments. Interim City Attorney Sarah Locklin provided comments. Chairperson Izant closed the Public Hearing. Vice-Chairperson Flaherty provided comments. Commissioner Hoffman provided comments. Commissioner Hirsh motioned to accept staff's recommendation with the modifications of providing a clean resolution and including the original CUP as an attachment. Moved by: Commissioner Hirsh Seconded by: Vice Chairperson Flaherty To determine the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to a Class 1 categorical exemption as defined in Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and adopt a resolution to modify the conditions of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP25- 13/APE25-004) at the existing liquor store (Robert’s Liquor) located at 74 Pier Avenue in the Downtown Commercial (C-2) Zone and to accept staff's recommendation with the modifications of providing a clean resolution and including the original CUP as an attachment. Ayes (5): Chairperson Izant, Vice Chairperson Flaherty, Commissioner Hoffman, Commissioner McNally, and Commissioner Hirsh Motion Carried 8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT Community Development Director Alison Becker provided comments. Assistant Planner Dede Tran provided a presentation. Commissioner Hoffman asked various questions. Assistant Planner Dede Tran provided information. Vice-Chairperson Flaherty asked various questions. Commissioner Hirsh asked various questions. Planning Manager Alexis Oropeza provided information. Assistant Planner Dede Tran provided information. Page 1125 of 1126 4 Community Development Director Alison Becker provided comments. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Vice-Chairperson Flaherty asked various questions. Community Development Director Alison Becker provided information. Commissioner McNally provided comments. Chairperson Izant provided comments. Vice-Chairperson Flaherty asked various questions. Planning Manager Alexis Oropeza provided information. Chairperson Izant asked questions. Community Development Director Alison Becker provided information. 10. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Questions from Planning Commission members regarding the status of future agenda items. No discussion or debate of these requests shall be undertaken. 10.a PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA - 26-CDD- 018 (Planning Manager Alexis Oropeza) Moved by: Commissioner Hoffman Seconded by: Vice Chairperson Flaherty To receive and file the March 17, 2026, Planning Commission tentative future agenda. Ayes (5): Chairperson Izant, Vice Chairperson Flaherty, Commissioner Hoffman, Commissioner McNally, and Commissioner Hirsh Motion Carried 11. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 5:57 p.m. Page 1126 of 1126