Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2026-05-12 | Regular Meeting
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Post-Meeting Agenda Tuesday, May 12, 2026 Closed Session at 5:00 PM and Open Session at 6:00 PM Council Chambers 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 CITY COUNCIL Mike Detoy, Mayor Michael D. Keegan, Mayor Pro Tem Ray Jackson, Councilmember Dean Francois, Councilmember Rob Saemann, Councilmember David Pedersen, City Treasurer APPOINTED OFFICIALS Steve Napolitano, City Manager Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney EXECUTIVE TEAM Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Martha Alvarez, City Clerk Alison Becker, Community Development Director Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director Landon Phillips, Police Chief Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 - To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices (ALD) are available for check out at the meeting. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, you must call or submit your request in writing to the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0204 or at cityclerk@hermosabeach.gov at least 48 hours before the meeting. PARTICIPATION AND VIEWING OPTIONS Hermosa Beach City Council meetings are open to the public and are being held in person in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. Public comment is only guaranteed to be taken in person at City Hall during the meeting or prior to the meeting by submitting an eComment for an item on the agenda. As a courtesy only, the public may view and participate via the following: Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89968207828? pwd=bXZmWS83dmxHWDZLbWRTK2RVaUxaUT092 • Phone: Toll Free: (833) 548 0276; Meeting ID: 899 6820 7828, then #; Passcode: 472825• eComment: On the HTML agenda, click an agenda item, then click on the blue “Leave comment” (on computer) / blue speech bubble (on phone/tablet) button to provide a comment for that item. Submit eComments no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time. • Supplemental Email: Submit a supplemental email for agenda items only to cityclerk@hermosabeach.gov. Supplemental emails should indicate the agenda item and meeting date in the subject line and must be received no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time. Emails received after the deadline but before the meeting ends will be posted to the agenda the next business day. Writings distributed to all, or majority of all, of the City Council after the agenda has been posted shall be available for inspection at the City Clerk's Office located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 during regular business hours. • The City will also plan to broadcast the meeting via the following listed mediums. Cable TV: Spectrum Channel 8 and Frontier Channel 31 in Hermosa Beach • YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofHermosaBeach90254 • Live Stream: www.hermosabeach.gov/agenda• Cablecast App: Available on supported devices and smart TVs• If you experience technical difficulties while viewing a meeting on any of our digital platforms, please try another viewing option. Page 2 of 1002 Pages 1.CLOSED SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 5:00 PM 2.ROLL CALL 3.PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA 10 This Public Comment period is limited to Closed Session agenda items only. Public Comment is limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. 4.RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION 4.a MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on April 14, 2026 4.b CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL (EXISTING LITIGATION) California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1) Name of Case: Koerner v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: 25STCP00891 Name of Case: Everett Faulk v. Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission, et al Case Number: 24STCP04022 4.c PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT / EMPLOYMENT / EVALUATION / DISCIPLINE / DISMISSAL / RELEASE California Government Code section 54957 Title: Direction regarding personnel matters including application of memoranda of understanding, and personnel rules related to displacement and reemployment rights. 4.d CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR California Government Code section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Tyler Cashman, Interim Human Resources Manager Organizations: Professional and Administrative Employee Group and Teamsters, Professional and Medical Employees’ Union, Local 986 5.OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM 6.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 7.ROLL CALL 8.CLOSED SESSION REPORT 9.ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS 10.APPROVAL OF AGENDA This is the time for the City Council to discuss any changes to the order of agenda items. Recommended Action: To approve the order of the agenda. 11.PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS Page 3 of 1002 11.a RECOGNIZING MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS MONTH 11.b CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ST. PATRICK’S DAY PARADE POST- EVENT REVIEW 12 12.PUBLIC COMMENT 21 This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction and on items where public comment will not be taken (City Manager Reports, City Councilmember Comments, Consent Calendar items not pulled for separate discussion, and Future Agenda Items). If public comment is provided on a Public Hearing or Municipal Matter item, public comment on the same item will not be accepted when the item is heard at a later part of the meeting. The public is invited to attend and provide public comment. Public comments are limited to three minutes per speaker from those present in City Council Chambers and via the remote participation options listed on the agenda. This time allotment may be modified due to time constraints at the discretion of the Mayor or City Council. No action will be taken on matters raised during public comment, except that the Council may take action to schedule issues raised during public comment for a future agenda. Speakers with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are encouraged to submit those comments directly to the City Manager. Members of the public will have a future opportunity to speak on items pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion, Public Hearings, and Municipal Matters when those items are heard. 13.CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 14.UPDATES ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITIES This is the time for members of the City Council to report on their attendance at ad hoc subcommittees or standing committee meetings, conferences, or other official activities as City representatives. 15.CONSENT CALENDAR The following matters will be acted upon collectively with a single motion and vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. Councilmembers may orally register a negative vote on any Consent Calendar item without pulling the item for separate consideration before the vote on the Consent Calendar. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember removes an item from the Consent Calendar, either under Approval of the Agenda or under this item before the vote on the Consent Calendar. Items removed for separate discussion will be provided a separate public comment period. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Consent Calendar with Agenda Item No. 15.d, being removed to be considered after Municipal Matters. Page 4 of 1002 15.a WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived. 15.b CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 68 (City Clerk Martha Alvarez) Recommended Action: To approve the minutes from the April 28, 2026, Regular Meeting and the April 28, 2026, Regular Adjourned Meeting. 15.c CHECK REGISTERS - 26-AS-055 85 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for April 22, 2026 through April 29, 2026. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands. 15.d AMENDMENTS TO THE HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB AND HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB AGREEMENTS - 26-PR-024 101 (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) Recommended Action: Motion to approve the seventh amendment to the agreement with the Hermosa Beach Rotary Club, approve the first amendment to the agreement with the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club, and authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest both amendments subject to approval by the City Attorney. Page 5 of 1002 15.e REQUEST TO APPROVE JOB SPECIFICATION REVISIONS, JOB SPECIFICATION ADDITIONS, BARGAINING GROUPS AND SALARY RANGES - 26-AS-052 138 (Human Resources Manager Tyler Cashman) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: Approve the revisions for the following job specifications: Senior Account Clerk (Attachment 1), Human Resources Manager (Attachment 2), Human Resources Analyst (Attachment 3), Community Resources Director (Attachment 4), Senior Recreation Supervisor (Attachment 5), and Recreation Specialist (Attachment 6); 1. Approve the establishment of the following new job specifications: Account Specialist (Attachment 7), Lead Account Specialist (Attachment 8), Senior Accountant (Attachment 9), Revenue Services Manager (Attachment 10), Human Resources Technician (Attachment 11), Senior Human Resources Analyst (Attachment 12), Recreation Supervisor (Attachment 13), Parks and Recreation Manager (Attachment 14), and Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst (Attachment 15); 2. Approve the establishment of the five-step salary ranges (Attachment 16) for Account Specialist, Lead Account Specialist, Senior Accountant, Revenue Services Manager, Human Resources Technician, Senior Human Resources Analyst, Recreation Supervisor, Parks and Recreation Manager, and Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst; 3. Approve the establishment of Account Specialist and Lead Account Specialist in the General and Supervisory Employees’ Bargaining Unit Teamsters Local 986; 4. Approve the establishment of Senior Accountant, Revenue Services Manager, Recreation Supervisor, Parks and Recreation Manager, and Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst in the Professional and Administrative Employees’ Group; and 5. Approve the establishment of Human Resources Technician and Senior Human Resources Analyst in the Unrepresented Employee Group. 6. 15.f RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING NEW CATEGORY AND FEE FOR COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT AREAS - 26-CMO-027 198 (Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss) Page 6 of 1002 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council Adopt a resolution establishing a new category and fee for certain commercial encroachment areas in commercial zones (Attachment 4); and 1. Amend the Master Fee schedule to reflect the new fee.2. Page 7 of 1002 16.PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M 16.a RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FROM A FEE STUDY UPDATE - 26- AS-053 211 (Continued from the April 28, 2026 , City Council Meeting ) (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Substitute Motion to continue the public hearing to June 9, 2026, to apply to the original 19 previously pulled fees plus the addition of fee S- 004. 17.MUNICIPAL MATTERS 17.a DEPARTMENT FY 2026-2027 BUDGET PRESENTATIONS - 26-AS- 054 676 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Motion to receive and file the FY 2026–2027 Department Budget Presentations. 17.b DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018 750 (Senior Recreation Supervisor Brian Sousa) Recommended Action: Motion to direct staff to proceed with a comprehensive feasibility analysis of Valley Park East as the primary location and the Greenbelt as a secondary location, and to return with information on a potential ballot measure regarding the Greenbelt location. 17.c CONSIDERATION OF INCREASE TO PICKLEBALL MEMBERSHIP AND RESERVATION FEES - 26-PR-025 937 (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) Recommended Action: Motion to approve Option 2, setting the annual membership rate at $25 and the resident hourly reservation rate at $12 per hour. 17.d CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY’S PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE LOS ANGELES COASTAL AREA SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY - 26-CMO-029 949 (City Manager Steve Napolitano) Recommended Action: Motion to direct staff to participate in the National Park Service Los Angeles Coastal Area Special Resource Study and to return draft comments for City Council review prior to submission. Page 8 of 1002 17.e INFORMATIONAL ITEM TO DISCUSS IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR ALCOHOL-SERVING ESTABLISHMENTS - 26- PD-008 965 Information items are for discussion only. No action will be taken. A City Council majority may request an action item to return at a future meeting. (Police Chief Landon Phillips) Recommended Action: Motion to receive and file the informational report. 17.f INFORMATIONAL ITEM REGARDING LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 1942: ELECTRIC BICYCLES: REGISTRATION AND SPECIAL LICENSE PLATES - 26-CMO-024 977 Information items are for discussion only. No action will be taken. A City Council majority may request an action item to return at a future meeting. (Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo) Recommended Action: Motion to direct staff to return with a letter of support for AB 1942 (Assembly Bill 1942) as currently written as an action item on a future Consent Calendar. 18.FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS This is the time for Councilmembers to schedule future agenda items and to ask questions about the status of previously approved future agenda items. No discussion, debate, or public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The tentative future agenda items document is provided for information only. 18.a TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 26-CMO-030 985 Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information. 19.CITY MANAGER REPORT 996 20.INFORMATIONAL ITEMS This is reserved for items that do not require City Council action. The City Council may request a future agenda item to discuss an informational item. Otherwise, discussion of informational items will not be taken. 20.a PARKING CITATIONS AND METERED REVENUE REPORT - APRIL 2026 998 (Senior Management Analyst Ken Bales) 21.ADJOURNMENT Page 9 of 1002 5 p.m. Closed Session Comment I know I have made a pest of myself on this issue for the past year, and I apologize for that. But I have been warning for months that the STR ban was legally vulnerable. I take no satisfaction in being right, but here we are. The writ of mandate was filed May 7. The likely appeal deadline will be around June 29, 2026 The City now needs to decide whether to comply or appeal. It is clear that the issue has now moved beyond “tentative ruling” talk. The City has three choices. 1: Appeal, seek or rely on a stay, spend legal money, and give up potential TOT revenue while the case drags on. The City may delay the ruling for a year or two, but based on existing Coastal Zone STR precedent, an appeal is an uphill fight. And the City cannot just file a cheap appeal, get a stay, and sit on it. It would have to keep paying its legal team to actively maintain the appeal through the record, briefing, stay issues, motions, and closed-session updates. Even if the City delays compliance, it will likely still need to allow at least some Coastal Zone STRs through a Coastal Commission-approved framework. 2: Do what Manhattan Beach eƯectively did after Keen: allow Coastal Zone STRs to operate under a license and TOT framework without trying to recreate the ban through restrictive new rules. I do not recommend that as I would expect STRs to slowly grow to a density that would harm the character of the City. 3: Take the proactive path: accept the ruling, start collecting TOT, and begin preparing practical Coastal Commission-compatible regulations. This way we can start implanting density caps quickly, and opportunists buying up homes to convert to STRS. We can accomplish this before STRs grow out of control. The oƯicial January 20, 2026 Manhattan Beach City Council transcript says: 191 licensed operators, 89 actively operating, and in fiscal year 2024-25, 175 licensed operators generated approximately $1.7 million in TOT revenue. So, Hermosa could be spending hundreds of thousands to delay a revenue source while discussing budget problems or create a pathway to start collecting TOT immediately. If the City tries to recreate the ban with a Coastal Commission CDP through hosted-only rules, unrealistic caps, density barriers, or other de facto restrictions, that is probably the slow path. Here is the practical path forward: The City already has a Commercial Zone STR framework that includes many of the practical tools the Coastal Commission generally accepts: licensing, TOT, inspections, local Page 10 of 1002 contacts, nuisance enforcement, trash rules, occupancy limits, and revocation for bad actors. It can be adjusted to include a reasonable Coastal Zone cap if the City takes that cap through the Coastal Commission process. Do not appeal just to delay the enviable Direct staƯ to prepare Coastal Commission-compatible STR regulations, create an immediate TOT pathway, and stop using litigation as a delay strategy. Page 11 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH ST. PATRICK’S DAY PARADE 2026 POST-EVENT RECAP & FINANCIAL SUMMARY Page 12 of 1002 COMMUNITY IMPACT & PARTICIPATION Strong participation from: Local Schools Nonprofits Community Organizations Local Businesses & Sponsors Civic Leaders Page 13 of 1002 PRODUCTION SCOPE Event Production Included: Multi-agency permitting & compliance Security + emergency planning coordination Street closures, barricades, and traffic control Vendor management (rentals, services, logistics) Parade participation coordination (entries, COIs, communications) Multi-stage setup + live annoucements Page 14 of 1002 FOUNDATION ROLE Chamber Foundation Responsibilities: Sponsorship sales & revenue generation Brand activations & partner management Pre-event fundraiser Event production oversight Marketing, design, and promotion Participant management Day-of execution and on-site management Vendor contracting & financial responsibilityPage 15 of 1002 FINANCIAL SUMMARY EXPENSES BREAKDOWN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (PUBLIC SAFETY, BARRICADES , INSURANCE, FIRE) CHAMBER FOUNDATION (EVENT PRODUCTION, MARKETING, OPERATIONS , STAFFING) $26,699 $24 ,960 FINANCIAL BREAKDOWN TOTAL REVENUE (REVENUE GENERATED BY FOUNDATION) TOTAL EXPENSES NET LOSS $34,856 $51,659 ($16,804) ADJUSTED NET = $9,896* Page 16 of 1002 CITY SUPPORT & PARTNERSHIP In addition to direct reimbursement, the City provided significant operational support through waived direct and indirect costs. Includes: Public safety staffing Administrative support ESTIMATED WAIVED COST = $27,631 Parking & street impacts Event preparation and coordination Page 17 of 1002 KEY TAKEAWAYS Remains a high-impact community event Requires significant planning, staffing, and coordination Chamber provides substantial in-kind production and operational support When fully accounted for, the event operates at, or near, break-even Page 18 of 1002 LOOKING AHEAD Opportunities to streamline operations Focus on sustainability and long-term viability Continued collaboration with the City of Hermosa Beach Page 19 of 1002 THANK YOU! QUESTIONS? Page 20 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name CommentDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Kent Mader Hermosa Beach has beautiful sunsets, incredible community spirit, and 3,000 dogs who have been patiently waiting their turn like very good boys and girls. Manhattan Beach has a dog park. Redondo Beach has a dog park. We love being thesibling of the South Bay, but even the youngest pup eventually gets to run off-leash. Bark for a Park has done everything right the petition, the research, the 11 locations. The only thing left is for Hermosa to fetch this opportunity and RUN witready to grow up. Let's make it official. Drop the leash. Let's GODOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Kathy Barron Hermosa Beach residents have so many dogs that a dog park would be so welcome hereDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Mark Clifford Wholeheartedly and enthusiastically endorse this agenda item.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Chandrea Miller I live in Hermosa Beach with my three dogs. All of my neighbors have dogs too. We are patiently waiting for our park! Thank you for making this dream come true!DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Wendy Finster Dear Hermosa Beach City Council Members,We are writing to express our strong support for the proposed off-leash dog park at Valley Park East.We have proudly called Hermosa Beach home for more than 11 years, raised our children here, and shared our lives with our 10-year-old dog, Summer. Over the past several yearsespecially since Covidthe number of dogs and dog-owning fHermosa has grown tremendously. Our community deserves a safe, thoughtfully designed off-leash space where residents and their pets can gather, exercise, and connect.As Board members of Bark for a Park, we have worked closely with the Parks & Recreation Commission to evaluate potential locations throughout Hermosa Beach. After extensive study, discussion, and public input, the Commission voted umove forward with a dog park and carefully considered numerous locations, including areas behind the baseball field, behind the South Park restroom, the Valley Park West slope, Bicentennial Park, and portions of the Greenbelt. These siteultimately ruled out due to concerns including ADA compliance, fire and safety access, neighborhood proximity, and ballot measure requirements.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Steve Yeager I hope we get an off leash area in Valley Park for my two small dogs. Currently hundreds of people with their dogs come to the park and many let their dogs run free in different areas of the park making enforcement nearly impossible leading citations. Lets fence off an area so everyone is happy.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Samuel Sampson Hermosa Beach thrives on its outdoor culture, yet we are missing a dedicated space for our canine citizens. A dog park provides a clear, legal boundary for play, which inherently improves the safety and cleanliness of our other public parks.navigating the uncertainty of shared spaces, a dog park offers a 'best of both worlds' solution: a vibrant hub for owners and a more peaceful experience for the rest of the public. I urge the council to designate a space that reflects our commuPage 21 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Mary Ann Benson Dear Hermosa Beach City Council Members,My husband and I have been residents for 39 years. We have had 5 dogs during that time. We would walk or run them 3 times a day and frequent all of the citys parks. But since they were unable to be off-leash, we would drive to HuntingtonCoronado, Idyllwild and Carmel, just to name a few, so that we could run, hike, swim and socialize them, off-leash. As a Board Member for Bark for a Park, we have worked closely with the Parks and Recreation Commission, your City Manager and each of you in order to address any and all city and resident concerns, in order to have an opportunity to alsoresidents have a place to run and play.We believe that we have found such a place. This is an isolated, underused space within the 8.75-acre of Valley Park. The area is east of the bathrooms and near the corner of Gould Avenue and Valley Drive. This section is away from the plabasketball courts, picnic tables and amphitheater. It is also physically away from homes, to address any noise issues. Valley Park has been widely used by families, children, neighbors and on-leash dogs. Anyone who lives near or frequents this area is aware of this. The only difference is that our proposal is to have our dogs in an unused area which is isolatactivities and events at the park. We intend on keeping the green space in its design. In fact, there would be far more attention to its green space upkeep than the overall park, which continually shows its wear due to soccer and other activities. And any wildlife or nature impnegligible to its current status.In closing, anyone who feels that this is a bad idea, should see how Valley Park is now and then see that an out-of-the way, under-utilized area would have zero impact to them or to our current park. After all, the park should be for everyoneeven our dogs.Thank you for your thorough consideration to this proposal.Mary Ann Benson Bark for a Park Board Member and residentAlan BensonresidentDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018IRINA GAAL My name is Irina Gaal and I live at 652 Gould Ave, half a block from Valley Park. I've been a Hermosa resident for over 25 years. I respectfully ask that the city please allow for the creation of a dog park in the area of Valley Park referred to as Valley Park East (near the north east corner). I practically raised my family in Valley park, given how many hours we all spent there with my kids as they were growing up. Now I walk through there daily with my dog. Its such a wonderful space that is used by all sorts of groups in our commare already so many dogs in the park, as many of us become empty nesters and change our focus to hanging out with our dogs, building a community of other dog-loving empty nesters and new dog owners. It would be so wonderful to have adogs could run off leash so we could continue to build on our dog-loving community rather than struggling with twisting leashes. The area being proposed is perfect-- secluded, rarely used by anyone other than dog owners. When my kids wethey used all the other large areas in the park, not this scooped out landscape where you can't run carefree or practice kicking or throwing balls. Kids just don't use that space. We received a flyer that some people believe a dog park in this small section somehow keeps Valley park from being a place for everyone. That couldn't be further from the truth. Creating a dog park makes it even more a place for everyone aowners would be able to safely let their pets run without impacting others in the park. I really really hope you make this project happen.Page 22 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Bobbi Newman Dear Hermosa Beach City Council Members,My husband and I moved to Hermosa in 1969 with our two toddler children and have had 5 dogs during these many years. During this time weve enjoyed walking on the green belt on and off leash when it was legal. Over the years we visited all the parks for more exercise and fun with the children and pets and we finally visited adjacent cities like Redondo, elSegundo then some small dog park strips in Manhattan beach, Most dog runs and dog parks areand dirty. During all these years weve lived in walking distance to Valley Park and socialized for years with other dog owners, small, medium and large . Sadly, all these dogs need more freedom to run and play so now we are excited to support the newValley Park for a safe, clean, shady area to do just that. Weve waiting many years to have an enclosed space to let our dogs off leash. Were looking forward to enjoying this with our dog, Laiki, our adult children, their dogs and our grandchildren with their dogs. The area proposed in the park is one we walk often. We rarely see anyone lingering or walking in the specified area and its east of the playground and bathrooms. Its very far from where large groups gather to do team practice or large speciaWe are pleased and grateful this project is being considered. Our three-generational family in Hermosa Beach thanks you. Bobbi and Ron Newman3312 Hermosa AveHermosa BeachPUBLIC COMMENTMonica Kumar Dear Council member,I am writing to respectfully ask that you vote no on placing a dog park at Valley Park.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Alysa Brennan We truly need an off leash park for this dog-friendly community! Valley Park certainly has space for it; I walk my older dog on leash there 2-3 times a week. But my husband has to drive every day to Redondo to take our other dog to that park sfreedom to run and expend energy. An energetic dog that is cooped up in a small apartment or house is not good for our close housing here in Hermosa. Adopting a dog truly changed my life. Having a park would encourage others to adopt shwalk and socialize with them - all import things for health and well being. Page 23 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Nayiri Dermenjian Dear Hermosa Beach City Council Members,I am writing to express my and my family's strong support for the proposed off-leash dog park at Valley Park East.We moved to Hermosa Beach just before Covid hit. Our children went to school for 4 months before Covid forced them to stay home and do online learning. We did what most people did adopted a dog to make online school a bit more toleyears ago, while running our dog at the park with a leash on, we got a $250 ticket that alleged Dog at large. Though we fought the ticket for months, at the end of the day we still had to pay that fee. We pay exorbitant amount of property taxes to parks for our children and pets. It was a very upsetting experience for us as a family, and since then I have personally been fully vested in having a dedicated leash free park where our dog can run without the fear of being ticketed. Almostafter that experience, I became a member of the board of directors of Bark for a Park. I wanted to be a part of a plan to design and implement a safe, thoughtfully designed off-leash space for our community dogs.As Board members of Bark for a Park, we have worked closely with the Parks & Recreation Commission to evaluate potential locations throughout Hermosa Beach. After extensive study, discussion, and public input, the Commission voted umove forward with a dog park and carefully considered numerous locations, including areas behind the baseball field, behind the South Park restroom, the Valley Park West slope, Bicentennial Park, and portions of the Greenbelt. These siteultimately ruled out due to concerns including ADA compliance, fire and safety access, neighborhood proximity, and ballot measure requirements.Following this thorough evaluation, Valley Park East emerged as the clear and most practical choice.Valley Park East offers the infrastructure and accessibility necessary to create a successful dog park within budget. The site already includes nearby parking, restrooms, open green space, and ADA-accessible access points. Importantly, a fdesignated dog park creates a safer environment for everyone by separating off-leash pets from childrens play areas, AYSO activities, basketball courts, and other park uses. The location is also ideally situated away from nearby homes, minneighborhood impact.Equally important, this project comes at an extraordinary financial opportunity for the City. Bark for a Park supporters are prepared to help fund the project privately, including an anonymous donor who has pledged to match all gifts of $100 $250,000!! To date, more than $70,000 has already been raised. Our supporters are committed not only to helping build the park, but also to supporting its maintenance and long-term success.This project reflects the very best of Hermosa Beach: community involvement, volunteerism, and neighbors coming together around a shared vision. Dog parks are more than pet amenitiesthey are gathering spaces that strengthen communencourage outdoor activity, and foster connection among residents of all ages and backgrounds. Few public spaces today create spontaneous interaction and civic cohesion the way dog parks do.Approving the Valley Park East Dog Park would be a meaningful investment in the quality of life, health, and connectedness of our community for years to come.Thank you for your consideration and leadership.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Bill Graw Ive lived in Hermosa Beach for 33 years. I have raised two dogs over the past 20 years, and I truly love dogs. However, Im concerned about this particular proposal for a dog park. Hermosa Valley Park was remodeled in 2001 and is perfect exThere are zero fences. Adding fencing to our existing open space feels like a step in the wrong direction.As a successful entrepreneur who has held a business license in Hermosa since 1998, I am skeptical about how the city could financially sustain the costs of maintenance and enforcement if the park were constructed. With that said, if a dobe approved, it would make more sense to centrally locate it near existing city services, including Animal Control, Public Works, and the Police and Fire Departments. The Greenbelt between City Hall and the Community Center (Skateboardbe a more logical location.For the record, I am not anti-dog park; I am offering a logical perspective. If a dog park is to be constructed, maintenance and enforcement should be the primary focus of the city. This decision is much bigger than asking, 'Do we need a dog pasking, 'Can we afford a dog park?' Ultimately, due to the annual recurring costs, this decision should be up to the tax-paying voters. I urge the council to truly find out what the majority of residents think in regards to the location and overall park and put it on the ballot.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Stephen McCall Against current options. Valley Park ought to be South East, away from valuable open space used by community, and not on Green Belt, especially not within view of Pier Ave. Consider 'Open Park' model, as per NYC, with open use before 7am and after 9pm, with restrictions on certain areas: playground etc. This does not look to have been included in Staff Study. Benefit of no major capital cost, low maintenanceparks open. Thanks! Page 24 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Hilary Meade We need a dog park in Hermosa. Where else can we allow our dogs to get energy out when most people don't have back yards? They are not allowed on the beach and they must be on leash everywhere else. Please approve this park. DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Melinda Green Please find my letter opposing the creation of a dog park in Valley Park and incorporate it into the public record. I oppose a dog park because it will negatively impact families, degrade the character of Valley Park, create safety issues to childHermosa Vista School, increase traffic congestion, and unnecessarily drain the City's limited financial and environmental resources.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Moira Nelson Personally, I would very much like to have a dog park in Valley Park. There are large areas of the park away from the play and picnic areas that would make convenient locations. Also, the paheavily used as a meeting place and off-leash running place by dog owners and their dogs. I think it would be good to shift that usage toward a designated part of the park where we mighthbe better regulated and monitored.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Kelly CastroDear Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council,I am writing to express concern about the proposed off-leash dog park at Valley Park East, as described in the Bark for a Park proposal.I have serious concerns about the safety of children playing at this park, one of only two sizeable green spaces in our city, by inviting dog owners from far and wide to spend time at Valley Park. We have alreadyhpedophiles ************ to children at both Valley and South Park. Remember the bathroom incidents at Valley Park? This proposed dog park will also impact the critically short parking situation for residents and parents getting their kids from school, activities at the park, and the Rotary. Valley Park is an important shared space for our community. It is used daily by residents for recreation, relaxation, and family activities. Many neighbors rely on this park as one of the few accessible green spaces inarea, and it plays a meaningful role in the quality of life for those who live nearby.While the proposal suggests that the area is relatively unused with minimal neighborhood impact, many residents experience this space quite differently. The park is actively used by families, children, and communand any plan to fence off a significant portion for exclusive dog use would reduce access for the broader public.We recognize and support the idea of creating a dog park in Hermosa Beach. However, we believe Valley Park East is not the right location. Converting part of a neighborhood park into a fenced, off-leash areamconcerns related to noise, safety, and compatibility with the surrounding residential environment.It is also worth noting that neighboring cities like Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach have successfully located dog parks in underutilized or less impactful areassuch as at the top of the hill in Polliwog Park, or iused spaces like Live Oak Park behind the baseball field, and under transmission lines at 190th in Redondo. These examples demonstrate that dog parks can be thoughtfully sited in ways that minimize impact oncommunity spaces.We respectfully encourage the City Council to explore alternative locations that are more centrally located and better suited for this type of use which may serve the entire community more equitably while minimon residential neighborhoods.Myself and residents immediately adjacent to the park support exploration of the Greenbelt option versus Vally Park. Please refocus efforts to the Greembelt which is a more suitable and underutilized space for a dog run like the successful new area in Polliwog Park. Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration of community input.Sincerely,Kelly Castro Hermosa Beach ResidenPage 25 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportCONSIDERATION OF THE CITYS PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE LOS ANGELES COASTAL AREA SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY - 26-CMO-029Dav There are a couple of things that need to be more well understood or clarified from the Staff report. One is about the pros/cons of designation. The other is about City's ability to avoid designatio (1) Designation appears to present potential (additional) local control and 'red tape' issues, traded off versus prospective funding. How well do wereally understand the potential downs mechanisms by which Hermosa might lose local control? (2) Would Hermosa have the power to reject designation by the Federal government throughout the entire evaluation process, even if we agreed to initially participate in for exploratory reasons? David Grethen - Hermosa Beach ResidentDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Laura PenaDear Mayor, Council Members and Staff -I want to begin by thanking the Bark for a Park residents, subcommittee, and everyone who has invested time, energy, and heart into this effort. Their work is a positive example of what can happen when residengage in improving our community, including for our furry residents as well. Bark for a Parks ability to raise more than $70,000 in donations and pledges and secure a matching grant of up to $250,000 is no small feat. At the same time, I think Council has to be honest about the tradeoffs.The staff report is clear that while the nonprofit may help fund design and construction, the City would still be responsible for ongoing maintenance and operations after completion. Those are not minor obligatrecurring service commitments. That is why this discussion cannot be separated from the Citys larger fiscal and operational realities. If the City isdiscussing service reductions, maintenance pressures, and limitedsthen the public deserves a clear explanation of the tradeoff if a new maintenance intensive amenity is added.What service gets reduced?What project gets delayed?What maintenance standard declines elsewhere?I support the concept of a dog park. But support for the concept should not mean bypassing the hard questions about long term operations. If the City moves forward, Council should require a full operating andanalysis before making any final commitment. Staff itself says a comprehensive feasibility report would still be needed. If the City is going to continue studying locations, the Greenbelt appears to offer the greatest overall public value. Staff identified major benefits including a central location near the civic center, minimal impacflat and shaded environment, nearby public restrooms and parking, stronger potential to support ADA requirements, and high foot traffic that could potentially support our downtown businesses. That mattersGreenbelt is not just a possible dog park location. It is the location with the clearest potential to connect a community amenity with broader economic and placemaking value.Bark for a Park made that same point in its recommendation letter, noting that a Greenbelt location could draw dog owners downtown which is what we need during the day time, mid week. And importantly,that during the January 21, 2026 onsite meeting with a Principal Designer from Gaudet Design Group, the designer expressed confidence that this area would be feasible for a dog park or dog run and identpreferred location among the two sites considered. That is significant. It means the Greenbelt is not only compelling from a community and economic standpoint, but was also identified by the designer as thecompared with Valley Park.Of course, the Greenbelt also comes with a requirement for a public vote. But that challenge should not cause the City to overlook the location that may offer the best long term value to the community. I appreciate and support the residents who brought this forward. I appreciate the Bark for a Park Subcommittee for showing what active civic participation can look like. But if the City is going to move this forwCouncil owes the public a transparent answer to two questions: 1. What is the long-term operational tradeoff? 2. Which location creates the greatest lasting public benefit if the City is going to take that on?If the answer is that a dog park still makes sense, then I believe the Greenbelt deserves serious consideration because it appears to offer the strongest combination of feasibility, minimal residential impact, accesvalue, and possible economic benefit.Thank you. Laura PenaDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Gabi Adler I strongly support a dog park in Hermosa Beach! Our city is the only one in the South Bay without a dog park, and yet quite a few appropriate spaces for one. I suggest either the Beach areaRodaway park as my preferences, but ANYoption would be better than the status quo!Page 26 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportPUBLIC COMMENT Ellen Robbins I am very much in favor of a dog park and supportive of the Valley Park East location. There is more than ample space and parking at that location, and a designated dog park area preventsletting their dogs run around there off leash which is prevalent. A dog park would be a tremendous asset to our community and would permit residents to connect and bond. DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Jessica Lebeouf I am writing to respectfully oppose the proposal to place a dog park at Valley Park. I love dogs (we had 2 for over 15 years and are in the process of adopting another) and support finding appropriate spaces for the communitys pets, but Valley Park is not the right localeash dog park for many important reasons.Valley Park serves as one of the few remaining open green spaces for families, children, and residents seeking a peaceful recreational environment. The park is heavily used by young children for play, sports, picnics, and community gatherings. Converting any portion space into a dog park would significantly change the character, safety, cleanliness, and accessibility of the park for the broader community. One of the biggest concerns is that Valley Park is directly adjacent to a school and frequently used by children and families. An off-leash dog park next to a school creates avoidable safety and liability concerns. Even well-behaved dogs can become unpredictable inenvironments, especially around running children, bicycles, balls, food, and noise. Parents should not have to worry about dog fights, aggressive behavior, unleashed animals escaping fenced areas, or children accidentally encountering unsafe situations while visiting twalking to and from school. Inevitably, those that come to go to the dog park will also create more Dogs all over the actual park even if its just coming or going to the park. Most likely also more off-leash even running around the park as it will draw more to this area. Mypersonally come out of school every single day and play at the park (which is the #1 reason we moved to Hermosa) and if a dog park went in we would absolutely not continue this. Sanitation and odor are also major concerns. Dog parks inevitably create strong odors from urine and feces, especially during warmer months. Even with responsible owners, waste is often missed or improperly disposed of. This can negatively affect nearby playgroundssidewalks, and surrounding neighborhoods. Children should not be playing in areas where contamination from pet waste becomes a regular issue. Dog waste can also introduce bacteria and parasites into grass and soil where children frequently play.Noise is another serious issue. Barking dogs, owner gatherings, whistles, and increased activity levels would substantially increase noise in what is currently a peaceful neighborhood park. Residents living nearby would likely experience ongoing disturbances throughout tincluding early mornings and evenings.Parking and traffic are already limited in the area. Valley Park does not have sufficient infrastructure to support increased vehicle traffic from a destination dog park. Visitors from outside the neighborhood would add congestion to already crowded residential streets, mmore difficult for families attending school functions, youth sports, and park activities. Living on 27th, Parking is already a huge issue for any of the residences in the area and many of the lots require the street parking. Increased traffic also raises pedestrian safety conceand families crossing nearby streets.Maintenance and enforcement are additional concerns. Dog parks require constant upkeep, monitoring, fencing repairs, waste management, watering, and enforcement of rules. Without continuous oversight, problems such as aggressive dogs, excessive barking, neand rule violations can quickly escalate. For those that have been to other dog parks also know that they do have to be updated frequently. This creates additional financial and operational burdens for the City.There are also concerns regarding fairness and park access. Valley Park currently serves a broad cross-section of the community. A dog park would prioritize one specific use over many others and reduce usable open space for children, seniors, and residents who maycomfortable around off-leash dogs due to allergies, fears, past experiences, or cultural preferences.Approving a dog park at Valley Park may also set a precedent for further conversion of community green spaces into specialized-use facilities without broad community consensus. Before making such a permanent change, the City should thoroughly evaluate alternathat are more appropriate and less impactful to schools, children, neighborhoods, and existing recreational use.I respectfully ask the City Council to preserve Valley Park as a safe, clean, family-oriented open space and reject the proposal for a dog park at this location. Please consider alternative sites that are better suited for this type of facility and more compatible with surrouninfrastructure and community needs. I would support the Green Belt far more than Valley Park if the city feels there has to be a dog park in this location.Thank you for your time, consideration, and service to our community.Page 27 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Kate Hirsh Dear Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council,I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed off-leash dog park at Valley Park East, as outlined in the Bark for a Park proposal. The City Councilshould consider locating a dog park on thcloser to the downtown civic/ commercial area.I live directly across the street from Valley Park with my two young children, and this park is a central part of our daily lives. My son regularly rides his bike in the exact area being considered,aserves as one of the few safe, open, and accessible green spaces for neighborhood families. There is also a well-loved climbing tree that local children use, as well as wildlifeincluding an owl thone of the treesthat would likely be impacted by fencing and increased dog activity.While I understand and support the desire to create a dedicated dog park in Hermosa Beach, I strongly believe that Valley Park East is not an appropriatelocation. The proposal characterizes ththe park as relatively unused with little to no neighbor impact, but as a nearby resident, I can attest that this is not an accurate reflection of how the space is currently used. It is actively enjoyedchildren, and neighbors on a daily basis.Fencing off one of the nicest and most functional parts of our neighborhood park for exclusive dog use would significantly reduce access for the broader communityparticularly young childrenthis space for safe outdoor play. Additionally, placing an off-leash dog area in a residential neighborhood raises concerns about noise, safety, and overall compatibility with surrounding homes.I respectfully ask the Council to reconsider the location of this project. A more appropriate site would be along the Greenbelt closer to downtown, which is more central to the entire Hermcommunity and less embedded within a residential setting. This would allow for broader access while minimizing the impact on families who depend on neighborhood parks like Valley Park.Again, I support the concept of a dog parkbut not at the expense of one of our most valuable shared family spaces. Thank you for your time and consideration.Sincerely,Kate HirshPage 28 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportREQUEST TO APPROVE JOB SPECIFICATION REVISIONS, JOB SPECIFICATION ADDITIONS, BARGAINING GROUPS AND SALARY RANGES -26-AS-052Laura PenaDear Mayor, Council Members, and Staff -I appreciate the effort to create clearer organizational structure and career pathways within the Park and Recreation Department. I believe this is also an important opportunity to modernize how the City connects staffing, operational accountability, andmoutcomes.One thing I noticed while reviewing the redlined versions is that some of the previous language related to a High Performance Organization and performance excellence within the former Community Resources Director classification appears proposed for removtransition to Parks and Recreation Director.While I understand the desire to streamline and simplify classifications, I would encourage the Council to reconsider retaining that accountability language as a statement of operational responsibility and public stewardship.I want to be clear that I am not advocating for overly bureaucratic job descriptions. However, I do believe there is value in modest language that connects leadership positions to broader operational expectations such as: participation trends, facility utilization, custooperational efficiency, fiscal stewardship, and service delivery outcomes.In particular, I believe the proposed Parks and Recreation Director position is the appropriate place to establish that framework because it ultimately oversees: long-range planning, departmental strategy, budgeting, fee recommendations, facilities, staffing,grancommunity programming.As the department head, I would encourage the Council to consider language that more clearly connects the Director position to: monitoring participation and utilization trends, evaluating program performance and cost recovery, improving operational responsiveness, and supporting transparent, data-informed reporting to City leadership and the public.I believe those additions would strengthen the classification without making it overly rigid or administratively burdensome.I also think the Senior Recreation Supervisor classification provides a good example of balance because it already references achieving performance and cost recovery objectives. That acknowledges accountability without becoming overly prescriptive.Why does this matter? Because the recent budget discussion makes clear that our City is facing approximately a $3.2 million projected structural deficit, while Parks and Recreation operations appear to operate with roughly $1.5 million in annual subsidy support. My cothe City can clearly measure, communicate, and continuously improve the value residents receive from those investments.Right now, the City appears to have limited operational visibility into: which programs are thriving, which facilities are underutilized, which services generate the greatest community benefit, and where operational improvements may exist.As the City modernizes classifications and expands its organizational structure, I believe it should also modernize how operational performance is measured and communicated.My recommendation is a balanced approach: maintain the organizational modernization effort, but pair those investments with modest accountability language, operational dashboards, and measurable service indicators. Over time, that foundation could supporon:participation,facility utilization, customer satisfaction, operational responsiveness, program performance, and cost recovery trends. That would not only help future Councils make better data-driven policy and budget decisions, but also help build public trust by showing resinvestments support community outcomes and quality of life. Ultimately, modernization is not just about changing titles or adding management layers. True modernization means aligning staffing, operations, fiscal stewardship, transparency, and public value in asustainable way.And in a time of growing fiscal pressure, the cities that will be most successful are not simply the ones that cut services or raise fees, they are the onesthat can clearly demonstrate performance, build public confidence, and show residents that every dollar invemeaningful community value.As always, I appreciate your thoughtful consideration.Laura PenaDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Allyson Schwartz I strongly support the development of a dog park in Hermosa Beach. Our community has many dog owners who would greatly benefit from having a safe, designated space for dogs to exerciand play off leash.PUBLIC COMMENT tonyhiggins Please click/tap on link aboveDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Matt Tuens I am 100% FOR an off-leash dog park in Hermosa Beach. I would like to fully support the Valley Park East location for approval. Thank you! - Matt TuensDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Brad Sidrick Valley Park East is the best location for a Dog Park.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018JB Anderson I believe an off-leash dog park will benefit the entire community as owners will have a place to take their dogs off leash to get their energyout and socialize. This will reduce owners taking their din unsanctioned areas of our community. It will also mean more tired dogs that will behave better and bark lessPage 29 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Susan S. Brown As longtime residents and dog lovers, we appreciate the importance of spaces for pet owners. However, we do not believe our small neighborhood park is the right location for a dog park.Wblocks of Valley park. Our park space is already heavily utilized and limited, serving families, childrens activities, sports, picnics, community events, and everyday gathering space for residents and visitors. Adding a dogfurther reduce the open, flexible areas that make the park enjoyable for everyone. It's bad enough that we have to compete with the kids on ebikes who jump the hills in the park and on our waWe are also concerned about the noise, odors, and potential safety issues that can come with concentrated off-leash dog areas, particularly in such close proximity to homes, the beach,recreational spaces. One of the strengths of our neighborhood is its peaceful and welcoming atmosphere, and we believe this proposal could significantly change that character.In addition, our community already offers many excellent walking paths and outdoor areas that accommodate dog owners without dedicating valuable park space to a fenced dog park. Weencourage the city to consider alternative locations better suited for this type of facility.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Jen Lamping As a long-time resident of Hermosa Beach, I strongly support the creation of an off-leash dog park in our city. Its frustrating that Hermosa Beach is the only South Bay beach city without a dedpark, especially considering how many residents own dogs and view them as part of their families.We have numerous shared park spaces throughout the city, and it seems entirely reasonable that a portion of one park could be designated for off-leash dog use - particularly since our beacheoption. Residents currently have no safe or legal place within Hermosa to allow their dogs to exercise and socialize off leash.A thoughtfully planned dog park would improve quality of life for many residents, create a stronger sense of community, and provide a designated spacethat helps keep other public areasmand respectful for everyone.I strongly encourage the City Council to seriously prioritize this issue and work toward a solution that better reflects the needs of the community.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Jim Butler Because this would be the only large dog park between Redondo and El Segundo, it would become a regional draw, exacerbating the congestion and parking issues that already exist in theneighborhoodDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018tonyhiggins Dear City Council. I live right next to valley park and i strongly support the dog psrk at the Valley Park east location. Its twice as far from homes as the Green Belt option, its bigger than the greenbelt option, it doesnexpense and hassle of a vote to change the land grant and the parking is no worse than the Greenbelt option. its a common sense compromise solution. The Parks masterplan identified this as a high priority want and the organizers have done an excellent job providing funding and plans. It will help withleash problem at the park. People are going to let their dogs off leash if they are not a threat to anyone. its better they do it inside a dog park. Page 30 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportCONSIDERATION OF THE CITYS PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE LOS ANGELES COASTAL AREA SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY - 26-CMO-029tonyhiggins Dear City Council. Someone needs to say if the national park option is the only viable path to a new pier that would otherwise cost 100 million dollars if 30 financing is included. You want new pier? Are you willing to give up the city's ownership of its beach to get it?DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Angie Rimmon As a resident living directly across the street from Valley Park on Gould Ave., I am writing to express concern about the proposed off-leash dog park at Valley Park. Bark for a Park's "vision" statestlooking for a space that has "minimal/no impact" on neighbors. This proposal is contradictory to such vision.Valley Park is an important shared space for our community. I can literally see the children's playground from my window and see how the children and families enjoy the park on a daily basis. Ta MINIMUM of 10,000 square feet of grassy park space from the community (as the proposal states) and to fence off the beloved large tree which is used by many families to picnic or use as shwould be a loss.I am also concerned about safety. Valley Park has so many children that run around and enjoy the playground and space. Many children also walk through the park to go to Vista School. To hpark so close to the children's playground, restrooms, and walking path to school is only inviting injury. Curiosity is something that all kids have and you will not be able to prevent little fingers frompet dogs through the fence or coming close to the gates as the dogs go in/out. There are already multiple off leash dog parks in the South Bay area. As such,I do not believe this proposedValley Park is necessary or even desirable for our community. I believe a dog park on the greenbelt is a better and safer alternative. Thank you.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Dan Rimmon Dear Council,I am against taking away any part of Valley park to be used as a dog park. I prefer it to be on the Greenbelt. I live across the street from the park. I am a dog owner but dont think this is a good idea. It is a great place for kids, adults and local fauna. I feel that a dog park would take away the ambcurrently has. I think it is a peaceful place that a dog park would degrade. I fear that it would be much noisier. Already people dont follow the current rules. They let their dogs off leash constanpick up after their dogs. I think that it would be worse with a dog park. It would make it much more crowded and bring in people from many other areas resulting in tougher parking, more trashunpicked up dog poo. It would add costs to the city for additional maintenance and police work. Plus we would loose the nice feeling that Valley park offers now. I think it would adverseresidents of Hermosa Beach and specifically those living close to the Park. Please consider your residents.I thank you for your time and consideration,Dan Rimmon455 Gould Ave.Page 31 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Adam Stoneman Mayor Detoy and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council,I am writing to express my strong support for moving forward with a dog park in Hermosa Beach and specifically to voice my support for the Valley Park location.Hermosa Beach has long lacked a designated off leash dog area despite clear and growing demand from residents. A well planned dog park would provide a safe, responsible space for doowners, reduce informal off leash activity in other public areas, and strengthen the sense of community that defines this city.Among the options being considered, Valley Park stands out as the most practical and appropriate location. It is already a recreational space, centrally located, and well suited to accothoughtfully designed dog park with minimal disruption to surrounding residential areas. With proper planning, it can be enhanced in a way that complements existing uses rather than competingI also want to acknowledge the work of Bark for a Park and the residents who have spent significant time organizing, engaging the community, and helpingbring forward a balanced proposareflects a genuine community need rather than a niche interest.I understand that any change to public space deserves careful consideration. At the same time, Hermosa Beach has an opportunity here to deliver a long requested amenity in a way that isintentional, and beneficial for the broader community.For those reasons, I respectfully urge the City Council to support moving forward with the Valley Park location as the preferred site for the dog park.Sincerely,Adam StonemanHermosa Beach ResidentDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Alisa Mitchell While I am in favor of building a dog Park in Hermosa Beach, I am against the proposed location of Valley Park. That space is highly utilized by residents for birthday parties, scout meetingsParking is already tough around Valley Park and this would make it worse. Additionally, students from the adjacent Vista school play in that space after school and an increased amount of dosafety at risk. Anywhere but Valley Park!DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Judith Clark Strongly support an off leash dog area. Not only does it build a sense of community, it gives a safe space for a pet owners to exercise their dogs and possibly less likely to find Dogs off leash creatinDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Jacob L Bark for a Park is filled with amazing individuals and involved Hermosa Beach community members, that have planned and figured out the best wayto get Hermosa Beach a dog paunderstanding, they are raising funds to cover most, if not all the costs, associated with the dog park. This is an easy yes, let's get a dog park Hermosa Beach! :)Page 32 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Amber Stoneman As a Hermosa Beach resident, I strongly support the proposed dog park at Valley Park. Our community currently has no designated space for residents to legally enjoy off-leash activities witdespite the large number of dog owners who live here and use our parks daily.The Strand is a great place to walk dogs, but it can become extremely congested with pedestrians, cyclists, kids, and dogs especially on weekends and busy summer days. Having a dedicatewould provide a safer and more appropriate place for dogs to exercise while also helping reduce congestion in other shared public spaces.I also believe the impact to nearby residents would be minimal considering the existing activity and noise already surrounding the area, including the schools, Valley and Ardmore traffic, youthpark, and ongoing construction throughout the neighborhood. Valley Park is already an active community space, and a thoughtfully designed dog park would fit naturally within it.Most importantly, this project would allow Hermosa residents to stay and enjoy our own local parks instead of having to leave the city to visit dog parksin Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, orThis is an opportunity to add an amenity that serves a large portion of our community while still preserving the overwhelming majority of the park for everyone to enjoy.I encourage the City Council to support this project and continue collaborating with residents throughout the design process.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018kristen keenan Let's have YAPPY Hour in Hermosa!!!DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Travis Green I am against allowing a dog park in Valley Park as Hermosa Beach is relatively small and has limited park space. It does not make any sense topartition away mixed use space for a dog parkwhen less than two miles away Redondo Beach has a wonderful 3 acre (130,680 square feet) dog park already. This is unnecessary and wasteful. DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Cara Looney As a 20+ year resident of Hermosa Beach, I support a dog park in Hermosa Beach - and specifically Bark for a Park's vision. The specified areawithin Valley Park is very well-suited for a dog paradd even more character to the area.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Howard Lee Click/Tap this message and then click/tap on this eComment's PDF attachment as necessary to view my testimony on this item. Thank YouPage 33 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Eileen M Reardon Valley Park was proposed by Bark for a Park because it doesnt want to waste $40K+ of their donor money on a Ballot Measure which is required for the Greenbelt section. They are intentionally regulations. Bark for a Park wants to take public space deemed underutilized (by whom?), that coincidentally doesnt require a ballot measure, to create a special use area that will impact the commu budget and our taxes without majority approval by the 14K registered voters in Hermosa Beach. Thats not advocacy, thats how special interest groups operate. A dog park in Valley Park will ruin the park open space design with fencing while destroying the meditative area near the community garden. While a dog park sounds like is a great idea for Hermosa Beach, the location, reallocation of existing public space, associated costs for maintenance and numerous other factors (parking, traffic should be presented for a vote to all registered Hermosa Beach residents regardless of the selected area since everyone will be affected by a dog park.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Arianna Please bring the dog park to Hermosa Beach! Itll bring the community together over something we all have so much in common: loving our dogs! The other surrounding beach cities have oneso sDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Candice Richardson I fully support the creation of a dog park in hermosa beach; it is very overdue and much needed! A public dog park would be a valuable addition to the community by providing a safe, operesidents and their pets to exercise, socialize, and enjoy the outdoors. It would help promote a healthier and more active lifestyle for both dogs and owners while creating opportunities forconnect and build stronger community relationships. INFORMATIONAL ITEM REGARDING LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 1942: ELECTRIC BICYCLES: REGISTRATION AND SPECIAL LICENSE PLATES - 26-CMO-024tonyhiggins Dear City Council,The council should immediately schedule an agenda item to adopt complementary rules with Manhattan Beaches recently passed common sense ebike regulations. We dont need ebikers pulling out their headphones, earbuds and cell phones the minute they cross the MB border to cruz on our busy strand and roads. thank youtonyhigginsDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Jeanne Nicastro I live in Hermosa Beach and strongly oppose placing a dog park in Valley Park. Valley Park is one of the few open green spaces where youngchildren can safely run, play soccer, gather withbuild community. It is heavily used by local families every single day and serves as an important space for kids in our neighborhood.While I support creating a dog park in Hermosa Beach, I believe the proposed Greenbelt location is a much better solution that allows both families and dog owners to benefit without taking awrecreational space for children.Please preserve Valley Park as a family-centered park and consider the Greenbelt alternative instead.Page 34 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Randy Balik At the outset, I'm neither for or against a dog park in Hermosa Beach. I am of the opinion that Hermosa Beach, as small, compact, and densely populated as it is, cannot have 'everything' thwant, and there are a lot of valid arguments against having a dog park at all. But I also understand why so many people want one.HOWEVER, I've seen proposals for one at Valley Park, and I am VERY against that. For one, dog parks can be noisy, and for those whose homes butt up against the park, I think it is quite unfairaadd something that can be this intrusive to the backyards of those who moved their without having that amenity as part of their equation. So I am speakingfor them even though this does nopersonally. Moreover, and perhaps even more importantly, it appears as though the cost to prepare a dog park in Valley Park is unnecessary when there are other locations. Personally, I feel that a wider spot along the greenbelt near Pier Ave that can be fenced in inexpensively makes a lot more sense. That's a noisier part ofHb and so additional noise won't beWhile parking for that may be more difficult, there are tradeoffs to all new things that residents want, and I believe that this is the tradeoff that should be considered.So....dog park? Perhaps. Dog park in Valley Park...absolutely not. Dog park along the green belt near Pier...worth considering. DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Addy Sawers Im a nanny in Hermosa and we spend at least 4 hours at the park everyday. Theres music class proposed location for the dog park is inconvenient as theres usually activities for kids in that areabelt location is a better location. DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Jackie Goodison I support a dog park in Hermosa but strongly oppose turning any part of Valley Park into a dog park and think council should consider the greenbelt option. I live with my family (a 4 year old dog and 2 year old daughter) on 28th street just east of Mornignside. We live under 500 feet from Valley Park. I am in the park at least twice a day. My daugseveral hours in the park each day.Valley Park is a truly beautiful park. It is the shared backyard of our community. The area proposed to be a dog park is also the place where the youngest children in our community play safely.they can be out of the way of soccer & lacrosse practice, and have no risk of running out into the street. This is where music class and mommy&me happens. This is where we they host Shakespark. This is where families and friends gather for cookouts and holiday celebrations. This is where people celebrate their childrens first few birthday parties. All of that said - I would love to take my dog to a dog park in Hermosa but not at the cost of losing the area where our children play and our community hosts events. I believe we should haveAND valley park. Page 35 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Harris Goodison I support a dog park in Hermosa but strongly oppose turning any part of Valley Park into a dog park and think council should consider the greenbelt option. I live with my family (a 4 year old dog and 2 year old daughter) on 28th street just east of Mornignside. We live under 500 feet from Valley Park. I am in the park at least twice a day. My daug several hours in the park each day. Valley Park is a truly beautiful park. It is the shared backyard of our community. The area proposed to be a dog park is also the place where the youngest children in our community play safely.they can be out of the way of soccer & lacrosse practice, and have no risk of running out into the street. This is where music class and mommy&me happens. This is where we they host Shakes park. This is where families and friends gather for cookouts and holiday celebrations. This is where people celebrate their childrens first few birthday parties. All of that said - I would love to take my dog to a dog park in Hermosa but not at the cost of losing the area where our children play and our community hosts events. I believe we should haveAND valley park. DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Daniel Gutierrez I am not in favor for a dog park located at Valley Park because families and children gather and use this area as often. REQUEST TO APPROVE JOB SPECIFICATION REVISIONS, JOB SPECIFICATION ADDITIONS, BARGAINING GROUPS AND SALARY RANGES -26-AS-052tonyhiggins Dear City Council,Dear CM NapolitanoFor what its worth i fully support Laura Pena's comments in her public comment that follows mine. In particular I fully support Ms. Pena's comment that:I [Laura Pena] appreciate the effort to create clearer organizational structure and career pathways within the Park and Recreation Department. I believe this is also an important opportunity thow the City connects staffing, operational accountability, and measurable public outcomes........However, I do believe there is value in modest language that connects leadership positions to broader operational expectations such as: participation trends, facility utilization, customeroperational efficiency, fiscal stewardship, and service delivery outcomes.Laura Pena:ENDThe problem is the City Manager has made little if any progress in establishing measurable performance objectives for himself or his directors despite acknowledging the inadequacy ofperformance standards almost a 9 months ago. If the city council and staff want to earn the trust of the public as they navigate our fiscal challenges going forward the city simply must do more to address the performance standards shortPena alluded too above. Your constituents simply must be given the tools they need to evaluate the performance of the City Manager and Directors IF your constituents will be asked to support your plans for navigatingfiscal our fiscal crisis. No Accountability No TrustThank You for Considering,tonyhigginsPage 36 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDEPARTMENT FY 2026-2027 BUDGET PRESENTATIONS - 26-AS-054Ira Ellman -If not already done, I would recommend a hiring freeze until the budget process is complete. -Increase controls on overtime (pre-approval, if that is not in place) -In addition to stating the negative impact t services from a 10% cut in their department as shown in the staff report, managers should detail what they will do to make it work.- The City Council should form a sub-committee and/or citizens group to investigate potential revenue, both incremental to current sources and creative new sources. Increasing sales tax residents is more than likely to fail again. -I am not particularly confident that Council Members will ask tough questions of department heads regarding headcount, utilization and efficiency of their 2026-2027 budget. -Closing the $3.2mm gap for the coming fiscal year and future years will be difficult. Cutting departmental expenses will be necessary, as short-term revenue generation is not an easy task. DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Tristin Kranenburg My family and I frequent Valley Park often and I oppose putting a dog park there. I think the council should consider putting it along the green belt instead.RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FROM A FEE STUDY UPDATE - 26-AS-053Kathleen KnollDear Mayor and City Council Members,I am writing to respectfully ask the Council to reconsider the proposed fee increases included in the current fee study, particularly the increases that directly impact small businesses trying to operate, improve, and stay relevant in this comOne example is S-018, the Temporary Minor Special Event permit, which appears to be tripling in price. We spent nearly two years working to simplify theprocess for a minor special event permit to allow businesses to be creative ingrevenue streams. Hosting minor special events helps bring people into town, and create the kind of activity that benefits Hermosa Beach as a whole.Another major concern is S-001, Commercial CUP Change, which appears to be doubling in price. Uncorked just went through this process, and even at the current fee level, it was very costly. In addition to city fees we also had tothrough the ABC. And In the coastal zone, Coastal Commission requires permits as well. In some cases, businesses may also be purchasing or modifying liquor licenses. When all of these costs are added together, it becomes cost-prohbusinesses to make the very changes needed to survive, grow, and keep up with rising rent, payroll, insurance, utilities, and operating costs.Year after year, for the past 15 years, I have stood before Council asking for support, understanding, and fairness. As business owners, we are constantly navigating requirements from the ABC, EDD, FTB, IRS, CDTFA, Health Dept, City CodCity Planning, and many other agencies. It can be overwhelming, expensive, and discouraging.We try to be charitable. We try to be an asset to the community. We try to create gathering places, bring people together, support local events, and contribute to the character of Hermosa Beach. I do want to acknowledge that themeaningful progress in streamlining some processes, and we really appreciate that. But these proposed fee increases feel like a step backward.If we want Hermosa Beach to remain a town filled with unique, mom-and-pop businesses not just chains or businesses with deep pockets then we need to support small businesses and make it easier, not more expensive, for themsucceed.We are simply asking the City to recognize the reality of what it takes to operate. Many of the people making these decisions have never had to run a business, make payroll, manage rising costs, or deal with the daily pressure of keeping I know you have the challenging task of balancing your budget but it cant continue to be in the backs of the businesses. We need city processes to be more efficient. Please choose staffs OPTION 4 to reevaluate these fee incefficiency study. As your customer, your constituent, and a long-standing business owner in this community, I am asking you to help us not hurt us. Please look carefully at these proposed increases and consider the impact they will have on the smallhelp make Hermosa Beach special.Thank you for your time and consideration.Kathy Knoll and Jeff BonafedeUncorked Wine Shops The Deck Hermosa beach. Page 37 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018mc guerry I am against a dog park. The city's financial situation is dire. The city need to focus on generating revenue instead. If the city does go ahead with a dog park, the best location would be the beach. It would bring people into the city from all over, people who would spend money inside the city, providinrevenue. INFORMATIONAL ITEM REGARDING LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 1942: ELECTRIC BICYCLES: REGISTRATION AND SPECIAL LICENSE PLATES - 26-CMO-024mc guerry This law, as well as the measures Manhattan Beach is taking, will not solve the "issues" around "ebikes." Almost every "issue" with "ebikes"is already illegal, whether it be the illegal e-motos that goto things like the running of stop signs. All this law will do is punish law-abiding citizens who want an easier way to get around our city. Older and disabled individuals who can no longer ride a regular bike will be one type of person thisEbikes have the possibility of bringing transformational change to our transportation system. Pollution from autos is the leading contributor to the climate crisis and microplastics in our oceans.reduce the number of cars on the road and encouraging ebikes is a great way to do that.This law will just discourage their use and will not even succeed in curbing the illegal activities in our city. The Hermosa Beach Police Dept has purchased e-bikes for their officers to use. This action is a wonderful first step in actually solving the "issues" of "ebikes."I urge you to reject this law.FYI - based on misinformation I have heard from members of the council, please note that Class 3 ebikes are NOT like motorcycles. They have a max speed of 28 mph and can not have a throttleone must be at least 16 to be on one. Again, reject this unnecessary and harmful law.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Bobby Sillman I oppose putting a dog park in valley park and think the council should consider putting it along the green belt. DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Tim Walling I live in hermosa beach and oppose putting a dog park in valley park and think the council should consider putting it along the green belt.Page 38 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportRESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FROM A FEE STUDY UPDATE - 26-AS-053Jon David I support option 4 which aligns fees with process reform. The staff report correctly identifies the key issue: the City should not lock in fees for processes it is actively working to reform. Option 4 properly defers development-related fees until after Administrative Procedures hearing and the upcoming commercial zoning updates. Setting fees now would force the City to recover the full cost of the current inefficient system rather than the streamlined process we intend to create. As Councilman Saeman stated at the Apri the goal is a quicker, cheaper approval process. Option 4 is the only approach that honors this goal. Add S-004 to Option 4I request an amendment to include S-004 (Precise Development Plan for commercial/mixed-use and residential) in Option 4s deferral list. Currently only S-003 (PDP for Condos) is on the lis rationale supports this: 1) Consistency: The report already defers S-001, S-003B, and S-034 because they are tied to the upcoming commercial zoning updates. S-004 belongs in the same category. 2) Procedural Similarity: S-004 and S-003 (already in Option 4) are functional equivalent. Both follow the same Planning Commission pathway and require comparable staff time. 3) There is No Procedural Conflict: The hearing remains open and there has not been a formal fee adoption resolution. Council retains complete legislative jurisdiction over all fees in the study. Why Option 4 Is Superior to Option 1 Choose Option 4 over Option 1 for two important reasons: 1) Option 1 bases fees on todays inefficient processes, the very system the City has already committed to overhaul. This asks applicants to subsidize the Citys procedural inefficiencies.2) Option 1 promises future reductions once efficiencies are found. In practice, once new revenue is built into the General Fund, it becomes part of next year's projections, we have accepted i and those reductions rarely happen on schedule. Option 4 sets the right fee the first time, after the new process is defined It encourages us to get to a quicker, cheaper approval process. Recommendation: Adopt Option 4 with the addition of S-004.Page 39 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Eric & Beth Tonne Dog Park Locations - OPPOSE Valley Park East & SUPPORT Greenbelt Dear Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council,I am writing to express concern about the proposed off-leash dog park at Valley Park East. Valley Park is an very important shared space for our community. As residents living very close to Valdog park will have a significant negative impact on the following: Open space at Valley Park including green space for trees and grass Natural Wildlife Space in Hermosa Beach including owls, hawks, coyotes, skunks, raccoons, possums, squirrels, & butterfly migration.TRAFFIC at the Gould, Valley & Ardmore stops signs which are already heavily congestedPARKING - always filled at Valley park. spills into congested neighboring streets that have limited parking for residentsNOISE / Barking - we can hear Vista school & Valley park (happy noise) all day from our home. Endless Barking is not happy noise & will be disruptive to residents & Vista SchoolPublic safety - dog waste increases flies & fleas in areas very close to playgrounds & Vista School - potentially, spreading diseases SAFETY - dog fights & dogs off leash near playground with small children and Vista School creates increase of dog bite riskAs Hermosa City Council is evaluates dog park then please explore alternative locations that minimize the impact on Valley Park, residential neighborhoods plus Vista & Valley schools. We support the Greenbelt location which seems the best for the community public use & minimal residential impact. Thank you for considering all sides on this important decisions! Best Regards,Eric & Beth Tonne650 Porter LaneHermosa Beach Resident DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Leyna Nguyen I grew up playing at this park, and I want my children to have the opportunity to as well. We can have both a dog park and a community park for kids of all ages to roam freely.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018AUBREY BROWN We NEED this dog park!! Doggies need to be free and play also. There's plenty of room to share at Valley Park and will provide more community interaction.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Jenny Lee We play at this section of valley park with our granddaughter and do not want to see it lost to a dog park. Please consider putting the park on the greenbelt. Page 40 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportRESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FROM A FEE STUDY UPDATE - 26-AS-053Laura PenaDear Mayor, Council Members, and Staff - I understand the Citys need to update outdated fees. The staff report makes clear that costs have increased due to higher personnel and benefit costs, overhead, interdepartmental coordination, regulatory requirements, and consultant support. Considering theC2023 for an "internal audit that would implement best management practices in order for the City to provide a high value of services to its residents in a cost-efficient manner," I have yet to see a report updating the public on those results.With that said, until clear streamlining and efficiencies have been implemented, I believe Option 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration remains the most balanced approach. It allows the City to improve revenue in the near term while preservingffees once the City completes its process review and identifies efficiencies. I've highlighted feedback on the fee study in the attached file to assist with that endeavor.I respectfully ask Council to add S-004 Precise Development Plan: Commercial/Mixed Use and Residential to the list of deferred fees. If S-003 CUP/PDP Condo is being reconsidered because the process may be streamlined, then S-004 PDP should be reviewed as well. Smand mixed-use projects are exactly the types of investments our City should encourage to support long term property tax growth, commercial vitality, and recurring revenue.That same recalibration logic should also apply to selected Public Works fees. The staff report acknowledges that Council could direct staff to return with potential code, zoning, or process amendments that may reduce review requirements or alter permit procedurfees are also based on current processes, then Council should review whether those processes can be streamlined before locking in full cost recovery.Public Works fees can directly affect business openings, construction staging, tenant improvements, public improvement plan checks, and commercial reinvestment. These are not just administrative fees; they influence whether it is easy or difficult to invest in our City.I respectfully recommend that Council:1. Adopt Option 4 as the balanced path forward;2. Add S-004 Precise Development Plan: Commercial/Mixed Use and Residential to the deferred fee list; 3. Apply the same recalibration approach to selected Public Works fees that are business facing, duplicative, code dependent, or likely to change after process review; 4. Direct staff to return with Public Works fee recommendations showing current review steps, overlapping reviews, and opportunities for streamlining;5. Create tiered fees based on project complexity and public impact;6. Consolidate overlapping Planning and Public Works reviews where possible, especially for A-frame signs and right-of-way encroachments; 7. Require 6- and 12-month reporting on application volume, turnaround times, review cycles, revenue, and customer experience.This is not about opposing cost recovery. It is about making sure cost recovery is based on an efficient, transparent, and coordinated process.Our fiscal future depends not only on higher fees, but on making it easier, faster, and more predictable for residents, businesses, and property owners to invest in the City.The City should not ask people to pay more for the system we are trying to fix. It should first build the streamlined system the public can trust.As always, I appreciate your thoughtful consideration.Laura PenaDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Adrian I feel a different location would be more appropriate Page 41 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Dave Andrews Dear Hermosa Beach City Council Members,I am writing as a Hermosa Beach resident, neighbor, and dog owner to express my strong support for creating a dog park in Hermosa Beach, specifically at the proposed Valley Park East locationHermosa Beach is a unique community. We are a small beach city where people know their neighbors, spend time outdoors, walk everywhere, and value community connection. We are alsomost densely populated cities in California, with limited private yard space for families and their dogs.Dogs are already woven into the culture of Hermosa Beach. Walk down Pier Avenue toward the beach, and you will notice water bowls sitting outside local businesses everywhere. Dogs are clour community.I have met countless dog owners whose daily routines revolve around neighborhood interactions morning walks, conversations with neighbors, coffeeshop stops, and visits to the fire station,wdogs know a treat container awaits them. These routines are not just about pets. They are about connection and community.Years ago, when my previous dog passed away, I realized something unexpected had disappeared too: the small community I saw every day on our walks. The familiar faces and conversatiostopped overnight. It reminded me how much these interactions contribute to the feeling of belonging in Hermosa Beach.I would strongly encourage members of the City Council to visit Live Oak Park at some point early in the morning. Talk to the dog owners there. Talk to the neighbors walking by. Ask people whyback every day.What you will likely hear is that these spaces are about much more than dogs.People meet neighbors they otherwise never would have known. Seniors have social interaction. Families gather. New residents feel welcomed. In manyways, these spaces become socialaneighborhood much like the community garden at South Park.When I first brought my puppy to Live Oak, the regulars had organized a one-year-old puppy party complete with treats and party hats. It was simple, local, friendly, and community-driven exaof small-town beach city spirit that makes Hermosa Beach special.Hermosa Beach has proudly embraced the Blue Zones Project through the Beach Cities Health District, promoting walkability, outdoor activity, social connection, and community well-being.Adesigned dog park aligns naturally with those same values.At the same time, Hermosa Beachs current approach to dogs is largely focused on regulation, fees, and enforcement. The City requires annual dog licensing, charges substantial licensing fees anand increased off-leash fines to $250 per violation.I fully support the importance of animal control services, licensing, rabies compliance, and responsible enforcement. These are important public safety functions. However, Hermosa Beach curredesignated off-leash recreational space anywhere in the city for responsible dog owners.Dog owners already contribute significantly through licensing, permit, and enforcement fees. Yet unlike many other recreational amenities supported through general community funding, dogeffectively asked to fund regulation without receiving meaningful recreational infrastructure in return.A thoughtfully designed dog park would not only serve dog owners but also strengthen the broader community by creating another safe outdoor gatheringspace that encourages physical acconnection, and neighborhood interaction.The proposed Valley Park East location appears to be a thoughtful and balanced solution that uses a relatively underutilized portion of the park while minimizing neighborhood impacts.RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FROM A FEE STUDY UPDATE - 26-AS-053Michelle Crispin Please see the attached letter from the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Bureau for Councils consideration regarding the User Fee Study and proposed fee increases.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Jennifer Rocci This has been well analyzed and evaluated. Hermosa does not have a dog park and this has been determined to be the best location due to it being a shaded, relatively unused portion of a ladog park is a great amenity to any neighborhood, and restrictions will be enforced to ensure safety, cleanliness and overall disruption. Page 42 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportRESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FROM A FEE STUDY UPDATE - 26-AS-053Dave Davis Mayor and Members of the City Council, I am writing to express concern about several proposed fee increases and the impact they may have on Hermosa Beach small businesses. I am concerned about the proposed increase to the Temporary Minor Special Event permit fee (S-018). Businesses and City staff spent years simplifyingthis process so operators could host smmore efficiently. These events generate revenue, attract visitors, and help create the energy and community atmosphere that benefits Hermosa Beach. Tripling this fee could discourage the very City should support. The proposed increase to the Commercial CUP Change fee (S-001) is also concerning. Businesses making operational improvements already face significant costs beyond City fees, including A Coastal Commission permits, and other approval expenses. Together, these costs can become prohibitive for small businesses trying to stay viable. Local businesses are already facing rising costs for labor, insurance, utilities, rent, and regulatory compliance. Additional City fee increases make it harder for independent businesses to adapt remain competitive. Yet despite these challenges, local businesses continue investing in the community by creating gathering places, supporting events, employing residents, and contributing to Hermosa Beac Hermosa Beach wants to preserve its independent business community, the City should make it easier not more expensive for small businesses to evolve and survive. I understand the City faces difficult budget decisions, but increasing fees on local businesses cannot be the only solution. I respectfully urge the Council to support Staffs Option 4 and reeva increases after conducting an efficiency study. As a longtime Hermosa Beach business owner, I ask the Council to carefully consider how these increases will affect the small businesses that help make Hermosa Beach unique. Sincerely, Dave Davis Hermosa Brewing CompanyThe DeckPage 43 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Mardi Watts May 12, 2026Hermosa Beach City CouncilDear Mayor and Members of the City Council,I'm writing to urge the Council to approve a dog park at Valley Park East. A project that has already been unanimously supported by the HB Parks & Recreation Committee after months of evaone that will cost the city nothing.Hermosa Beach has an estimated 3,000+ dogs and not a single off-leash space. That's a real gap for a lot of residents. A dog park would give our pets somewhere to run and socialize,acommunity a place to connect. The kind of everyday gathering spot that makes a neighborhood feel like home. Research consistently shows dog parks also boost surrounding property values, so the benefits extend well beyond dog owners.Valley Park East is the right spot. It's an underutilized area with no neighbor impact, it's walkable, and parking is already available. It's a natural fit.Most importantly, this will be 100% donor-funded. Construction, and ongoing maintenance. No burden on the city budget, we just need a yes.Manhattan Beach has three dog parks. I'd love for Hermosa Beach to have its first.Thank you for your time and for everything you do for our community. Warm regards,Mardi WattsHermosa Beach ResidentPUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDAAlyssa Greene Against dog park in Valley Park. For green belt dog park. DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Justin Hackman I work within walking distance of valley park. My wife and I regularly take our children to the park to enjoy the many amenities. the parks facilities are currently being utilized to the maximumsustain any decrease in programming capacity to accommodate dogs who are already able to use the existing spaces. Additionally, the noise disruptionand noxious odors caused by the masdogs to a dedicated area will significantly affect the experience of using the park by making it both a loud and unclean feeling area. Animal feces also can harbor disease and increasing thanimal deification in the area only increases risk for the most immunodeficient and vulnerable users of the park (children and elderly). The park is actually perfect today and If any changes areshould be additional program for children and the core human users already enjoying the space. Page 44 of 1002 City Council Regular Meeting - May 12, 2026Ecomment ReportDOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018Len Hirsh I am strongly opposed to the idea of an off-leash dog park at Valley Park East, as described in the Bark for a Park proposal. This is a really terrible idea.My kids are in the park every day, and not just at the little playground. Theyre 10 and 12 now, and the space being considered is exactly where they play with their friends. Valley Park is an impospace for our community. It is used daily by residents for recreation, relaxation, and family activities. Many neighbors rely on this park as one of thefew accessible green spaces in a residentialplays a meaningful role in the quality of life for those who live nearby.The dog people can go elsewhere like Dominguez Park or Live Oak Park. All the dog people I know in Hermosa Beach dont even want this to happen. And frankly,we dont need more trafficenough with the traffic that comes from two adjacent 4-way stop signs, from Artesia/Gould being a pass-through street with beach access, and from people dropping off and picking up kidsaand Valley school. We dont need to add 100 Karens now paying less attention to their dogs and having those dogs bit people, kids or other dogs. Its bad enough as is.While the proposal suggests that the area is relatively unused with minimal neighborhood impact, many residents experience this space quite differently. The park is actively used by families,ccommunity members, and any plan to fence off a significant portion for exclusive dog use would reduce access for the broader public.Valley Park East is not the right location for a dog park in Hermosa Beach. Converting part of a neighborhood park into a fenced, off-leash area may introduce concerns related to noise,compatibility with the surrounding residential environment.It is also worth noting that neighboring cities like Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach have successfully located dog parks in underutilized or less impactful areassuch as at the top of the hPark, or in smaller, less-used spaces like Live Oak Park behind the baseball field, and under transmission lines at 190th in Redondo. These examples demonstrate that dog parks can be thoughways that minimize impact on heavily used community spaces.We respectfully encourage the City Council to explore alternative locations that are more centrally located and better suited for this type of use which may serve the entire community more eqminimizing impacts on residential neighborhoods.Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration of community input.DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-019Lisa Greenstone I am in favor of a community dog park in Hermosa and this proposed part of Valley park seems like a well thought out, central location away from residents.In our dense neighborhood filled with countless townhomes that lack yards, our town brings a welcome feel to our dogs yet does not provide a designated place for them (and their friendly owplay, and gather.Complaints about barking dogs in tight spaced residences (that don’t have opportunity to run off leash and expend their energy) could diminish dramatically. As a member of the Wellness Council for HBCSD and BCHD, the benefits for a dog park for our community extend far beyond a place for our pups to play. The social component for youintergenerational opportunities that seem rare in today’s world, and the gathering of like-minded responsible dog owners, provides social and emotional wellness that has far reaching benlongevity and overall health and well being. To me, we have the space to allow for it, and plenty of residents that will use it responsibly. I see only an upside to continuing to move forward with the project.Thank you, Lisa GreenstonePage 45 of 1002 SUPPLEMENTAL testimony from Howard Lee to the 05-13-2026, 6-PM HB City Council Meeting’s Municipal Matters Item 17.b Page 1 of 3 SUPPLEMENTAL eComment testimony to the Tuesday, May-13-2026, 6-PM Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting for Municipal Matters Item-17.b To: Hermosa Beach City Council, City Manager, BB&K Contract City Attorney, City Clerk, and others: From: Howard Lee, Hermosa Beach Resident Re: Dog Park Consideration HBCC meeting of 05-13-2026 Posted to these eComments and advance-copied to HB city officials May 13, 2026 Full agenda direct link.. https://pub-hermosabeach.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=c39fa65e-ce61-4fd9-948e- 7546132658f5&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English Go to the full agenda using the above link, drill down to Municipal Matters Item 17.b to view the following item’s staff report, attachments and eComments. (eScribe’s incredibly user-unfriendly design unfortunately does not provide a useable single direct hyper-link to Item 17.b, with its Staff Report, attachments, and all eComments within) Municipal Matters Item 17.b DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018 (Senior Recreation Supervisor Brian Sousa) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council review and consider the feasibility of designating a location within Hermosa Beach for an off-leash dog park and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission’s recommendation to further explore potential locations at Valley Park (East) and within a portion of the Greenbelt, and to consider the potential for a future ballot measure to amend Ordinance No. 89 -1001. Honorable Council and others: With all due respect the dog park issue is completely out of control. The residents interested in this matter should have long-ago used their energy to create a people’s initiative and placed the matter on the ballot. They easily could have qualified it by now. That they didn’t may indicate they may not want all of the people of the city to have a say in this matter. That would be more than unfortunate if true. The idea that these interested residents today may also indicate they will cover all city costs of such dog park is commendable, however, virtually impossible to cast into law. Page 46 of 1002 SUPPLEMENTAL testimony from Howard Lee to the 05-13-2026, 6-PM HB City Council Meeting’s Municipal Matters Item 17.b Page 2 of 3 Thus how such payment process will actually work well and into the future and then what is the real legality of having a lay council (here today, gone tomorrow) awarding a specific area of public lands of the city for the de facto financed control of a specific group of individuals, having a specific interest, is more than questionable and nebulous at best. The proper way for this to work is for the council to therefore create a ballot measure specifying the parameters and location of a so-called dog park, specifications, hours, and true costs, etc. The city will need to cover the costs of the dog park as with any park, although obviously people are always welcome to make donations to the City, donations toward the specific dog park, as with budget items, however with no special entitlements or encumbrances necessarily being awarded them. Notwithstanding the complete fiscal crisis the city is evidently now in and very much aware, there evidently have been perhaps no donations made for all the staff and commission time already expended to date for this dog park issue, yet there is apparently many folk in town with and without dogs who are not necessarily aware of, or interested in a dog park, which may or may not be located anywhere near their residence. The fact that so many in city may have dogs also is not a reflection of a specific need for a dog park. People who located to Hermosa Beach no doubt did so without respect to the presence or lack of presence of a dog park. The logic used through this entire dog park issue has been defective , and somewhat highly-biased to say the least. A dog park for this 1.4 square mile city, and especially in part of the city’s most important community park (other than the beach itself) makes very little sense. The city has limits and cannot be all things. Btw, sooner or later, HB will merge with Manhattan Beach or Redondo Beach out of fiscal necessity and benefit to all concerned. Hopefully the other group filibustering for a swimming pool de facto complex should first push for the city merger as clearly desirable as it may be that their swimming pool complex currently has little chance of being anywhere close to viable. Ask former C.M. Suja regarding the Taj Mahal City Hall concept, or for that matter can you say City Yard? Hello!!!!!!!! Those aware of the El Segundo dog park on inside Imperial Highway (divided for both small dogs and large dogs) should be well aware of the constant comings and goings of vehicles from other cities to there, and the negative effects for the residents of so many transients coming and going with their dogs, as if Valley Park the city’s main community park doesn’t already have parking issues. Page 47 of 1002 SUPPLEMENTAL testimony from Howard Lee to the 05-13-2026, 6-PM HB City Council Meeting’s Municipal Matters Item 17.b Page 3 of 3 The fair way to handle this matter is to place a well-specified measure on the ballot (requires a noticed Public Hearing to approve the measure perhaps) for the community as a whole to see the specifications, parameters, etc., etc. and to decide after full debate during the election period, of all particulars and actual costs known by all. For a lay-city-council to railroad this dog park through on its own, would be a mistake. Also, for a lay council of 5, three of whom are likely running for re-election, or others seeking election to the council very soon, to presume this is an issue to support or aid in their election may well be very foolish to assume. I.e. Dog park folly. Best to stay very neutral if running for city council in the November election, i.e. pulling papers in August, 90 days from now. It would best be for the Council again, to place a very carefully worded measure on the ballot and allow the voters to decide this matter. For some fifty years I’ve personally noted many such feel-good issues come before council where it seemed as if the entire city, let alone the entire planet, supported same. Often, how wrong that may have been the case. It’s called “Packing the Chambers” week after week with proponents of an idea. The best decisions result when all know really what is actually going on. In this particular matter, believe it or not, all may not really know what is going on. Most respectfully. Page 48 of 1002 FEE STUDY ANALYSIS Fee-by-Fee Analysis & Recommendations Code Fee Name Current Fee Proposed Fee Recommendation Rationale & Public Comment Summary S-001 CUP – Commercial / Other Use $6,065 $12,800 OPTION 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration pending May 26th zoning administrative procedures review. REDUCE: Create tiered fees based on project complexity and hearing requirement. TIMELINE: Phase in fees over 3 years An 111% increase will deter small business investment. The fee is based on current staff time, public hearing requirements, noticing, interdepartmental review, and management review. If the City is considering administrative or director level review for lower impact uses, then the cost basis for those fees may change materially. Adopting full cost fees before analyzing those process changes risks charging businesses for a process the City may soon streamline. S-003 CUP/PDP – Condo Development $6,299 PLUS $243/unit (>2 units) $9,190 PLUS $590/unit (>2 units) OPTION 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration pending May 26th zoning administrative procedures review. REDUCE: Fees for routine 2 unit condos and create Administrative Review. TIMELINE: Phase in fees over 3 years PDPs cover a wide range of project complexity. The upcoming zoning meeting will allow lower complexity PDPs to be reviewed at the director level, making a flat $9k fee potentially inapplicable to those applications. If projects are repetitive and approved with standard conditions, the City should not price them like highly discretionary projects. Reducing the time of development is a major lever to increase property tax revenue. Increased efficiency and reduced time delay should result in a lower fee, not a higher one. S-004 Precise Development Plan- Mixed- Use $6,624 $9,609 OPTION 4: Add to list of fees considered for Deferral and Recalibration pending May 26th zoning administrative procedures review. REDUCE: Fees and create separate tiers for minor mixed-use, standard PDP, and complex PDP. TIMELINE: Phase in fees over 3 years PDPs cover a wide range of complexity. If PDPs for condo development are being pulled for consideration, PDPs for commercial use follow the same review process, staff reports, noticing, and the same broader question of whether it can be streamlined should be evaluated. Mixed use projects and commercial investments are exactly the kind of projects that we should be encouraging if the City wants long term recurring revenue from property tax growth. Since S-005 was added after the fact, then S-004 should be added with a motion to reconsider. S-004 Precise Development Plan – Residential $6,299 $8,150 OPTION 4: Add to list of fees considered for Deferral and Recalibration pending May 26th zoning administrative procedures review. REDUCE: Fees & create a standard PDP and complex PDP. SAME AS ABOVE Hermosa Beach 5/12/26 | Fee Study Analysis | Page 1 Page 49 of 1002 Code Fee Name Current Fee Proposed Fee Recommendation Rationale & Public Comment Summary TIMELINE: Phase in fees over 3 years S-005 TEXT AMENDMENT $7,078 $18,000+OPTION 4: Agree with staff; waive hourly rates/costs for minor clarifications or outdated wording corrections approved by director. REDUCE: Fees & create separate categories for minor code cleanup, public benefit waiver, and major applicant driven amendments. If a single word or sentence needs to be changed, and the director agrees that the amendment benefits the broader community or corrects an outdated, unclear, or inefficient code create a public benefit waiver. The goal should be to encourage improvement of the code, not penalizing it. The high fee may discourage applicants from identifying small, but important code fixes that would improve clarity and support economic development. S-006 Zone Change / Zoning Code Amendment ~$7,100 est. ~$17,421 (+245%) OPTION 4: Agree with staff; utilize deposit based model at 80% allocated rates, allow refunds if staff time is lower than estimated. REDUCE: Fees & create categories for public benefit waiver and City initiative pathway vs. major applicant driven amendments. A 245% increase is the largest percentage increase in the development fee matrix. Not every zoning amendment is purely private benefit. Zone changes are infrequent and complex; however, a near tripling of the fee discourages property owners from pursuing beneficial rezoning. At minimum if the director agrees it applies to a broader community benefit, a waiver should be considered. The goal should be to encourage improvement of the code, not penalizing it. S-007 Variance $4,674 $9,985 OPTION 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration pending May 26th zoning administrative procedures review. REDUCE: Fees and review internal process for streamlining options and comparison to neighboring cities like RB. TIMELINE: Phase in fees over 3 years More than doubling the variance fee will price out modest property owners seeking relief from minor code requirements (e.g., small additions, setback variances). Redondo Beach processes similar items at $3,200. Why do our fees need to be almost triple that amount? What are process requirements for this permit and could streamlining the review create cost efficiencies? S-008 Sign Variance $3,338 $7,980 OPTION 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration pending zoning admin/citywide procedures review. REDUCE: Fees and review internal process for streamlining Admin options (tiers) and comparison to neighboring cities. TIMELINE: Phase in fees over 3 years Sign variances are typically sought by small businesses. The 139% increase should be reexamined for small businesses trying to improve visibility, storefront identity, and wayfinding purposes. Our proposed increase is more than twice Manhattan’s $3,574 sign exception and twice Redondo’s $3,430 for Planning Commission review. Hermosa needs to be competitive with neighboring cities. Also, these cities create tiers for signage (single tenant, multi-tenant, face change, temporary, exception, etc with reduced fees accordingly). S-009 Parking Plan $5,596 $8,241 PLUS deposit determined by staff OPTION 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration pending May 26th zoning administrative procedures review. REDUCE: Fees and create separate tiers A major private development, shopping center, or high-impact commercial site may justify a higher level of staff review, traffic analysis, interdepartmental coordination, and possible consultant costs. However, a small shared parking arrangement, a 4 space rear lot parking plan behind a small Hermosa Beach 5/12/26 | Fee Study Analysis | Page 2 Page 50 of 1002 Code Fee Name Current Fee Proposed Fee Recommendation Rationale & Public Comment Summary based on minor/shared use, standard, and complex parking plans. TIMELINE: Phase in fees over 3 years commercial building, or a modest project should not be charged like a major parking analysis for a large site. The City should clarify what level of work justifies this fee and whether the fee assumes Planning Commission review, public noticing, multiple departments, or technical studies. S-013 Final Map $875 $3,315 OPTION 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration pending May 26th zoning administrative procedures review. REDUCE: Fees and create tiers if LA County continues Technical Review TIMELINE: Phase in fees over 3 years Clarify if we are taking over technical map review from LA County, if not then a higher City fee may be reasonable. But if LA County continues to perform the technical review and applicants continue to pay County fees separately of $11,000, then Hermosa should not impose a large additional fee unless it clearly documents the City’s distinct role and deliverables. If the City’s role is primarily verifying signature blocks, coordinating routing, and placing the final map on the consent calendar, then the proposed $3,315 fee should be significantly reduced or tiered. S-017 Mural Review $578 $3,010 (+421%) OPTION 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration pending zoning admin/citywide procedures review. REDUCE: Fees and review internal process for streamlining Admin option. TIMELINE: Phase in fees over 3 years City should establish objective mural standards enabling administrative approval (no planning commission hearing), which would dramatically reduce the actual cost basis. Delay pending development of those standards. Does the City want to incentivize beautification like murals? Is there a community benefit to encouraging art that could activate our downtown and increase foot traffic? Increasing fees over 421% will not help. S-018 Temporary Use Permit $589 Seasonal Sales $805, TMSEP $ $1,900, Date Change $335 per application OPTION 4: Reevaluate due to streamlined process and reduce fees, especially for renewal events, create discounted category for repeat applicants and date changes. There appears to be a major error in the Fee Study Update. The TMSEP (Temporary Minor Special Event Permit) appears in Fee No. S-018 Temporary Use Permit and Fee No. S-033 Administrative Use Permit ($2,100 per application) with different staff hours allocated. S-018A M-1 Zone Limited Events Permit $520 $1,100 OPTION 4: Reevaluate due to streamlined process and reduce fees, especially for renewal events. Do we want to encourage minor events that have low impact on the environment and help businesses thrive? I strongly encourage reviewing the process for these applications before increasing the fees. S-041 Preliminary Plan Review $161/ meeting Tiered: $1,275 (Non- Residential) / $2,430 (with other depts) OPTION 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration pending May 26th zoning administrative procedures review. REDUCE: Fees and review internal process for clarifying what applicants receive for the fee. Preliminary plan review is a pre-application service that encourages applicants to engage early reducing errors, revisions, and staff time downstream. Dramatically increasing pre-application fees discourages early engagement, which increases total review costs for both the City and applicants. A more modest increase of 50% over current rates better aligns with the service's purpose. Hermosa Beach 5/12/26 | Fee Study Analysis | Page 3 Page 51 of 1002 Code Fee Name Current Fee Proposed Fee Recommendation Rationale & Public Comment Summary TIMELINE: Phase in fees over 3 years S-081C A-Frame / Sandwich Board Encroachment Permit $339 $460 OPTION 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration pending zoning admin/citywide procedures review. REDUCE: Fees and adopt a placement standard while reviewing the internal process for streamlining opportunities. The City should adopt a placement standard but consider waiving or minimizing this fee to support the pedestrian retail environment Hermosa Beach depends on for economic vitality. Currently, the code doesn’t allow two businesses to advertise on the same A-frame board preventing cross promotion of our businesses. The standards undermine the economic partnerships for our businesses, thus reducing potential sales tax revenue. S-003B Annual CUP Review Fee (if adopted) None $570 annual recurring fee ELIMINATE: Fee DEFINE: If the City wants to create an additional layer of work for staff, define the scope, which CUPs apply and associated standards, whether they will be complaint basis, etc. Raises serious concerns about undefined process standards, lack of transparency about what triggers modification, and uncertainty that prevents long-term planning. No public process has defined what 'annual review' entails. Also, the types of business (and residences) this applied to varies greatly. Is the City really going to send residences an annual bill because they were built using a CUP? S-030 Planning Sign Permit $795 $1,395 OPTION 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration pending zoning admin/citywide procedures review. REDUCE: Fee and clarify sign purpose while adopting placement standards. Review the internal process for streamlining opportunities and comparison to neighboring cities. TIMELINE: Phase in fees over 3 years Need to define “Planning Sign Permit” as it is not listed in our code Chapter 17.50. Redondo Beach charges $102 for construction site signs and Manhattan Beach charges $170 for Sign Permit – Temporary. If the “Planning Sign Permit” is for small businesses this compounds with the sign variance fee (S-008). Multiple public commenters cited cumulative fee burden. Limiting increases on routine sign permits, which are ministerial and low-complexity to no more than 20–30% would recognize that these are high- frequency, low-impact transactions. Also, our neighboring cities create tiers for signage (single tenant, multi-tenant, face change, temporary, exception, etc with reduced fees accordingly to the complexity). S-030A Planning A- Frame Sign Permit $201 Renewal $121 $250 Renewal $110 OPTION 4: Reduce annual renewal fee to $50, allow businesses to cross promote specials and events. Streamline this process to reduce unnecessary staff resources, especially for renewal applications. Limiting increases on routine sign permits, which are ministerial and low-complexity to no more than 20–30% would recognize that these are high- frequency, low-impact transactions. S-033 Administrative Use Permit $621 $2,100 OPTION 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration pending May 26th zoning administrative procedures review. There appears to be a major error in the Fee Study Update. The TMSEP (Temporary Minor Special Event Permit) appears in Fee No. S-018 Temporary Use Permit and Fee No. S-033 Administrative Use Permit ($2,100 per application) with Hermosa Beach 5/12/26 | Fee Study Analysis | Page 4 Page 52 of 1002 Code Fee Name Current Fee Proposed Fee Recommendation Rationale & Public Comment Summary REDUCE: Create tiered fees based on project complexity. different staff hours allocated based on one application. Please clarify what administrative actions are covered under this permit. Create tiers based on project complexity. According to the draft Administrative Procedures document, Temporary Uses and Temporary Events are listed under this permit so is Supportive Housing, Short Term Vacation Rental, Entertainment-Limited Live, Limited Outdoor Seating, Low Barrier Navigation Centers, etc. S-064 Public Improvement Plan Check Res/ Comm $1,451 per plan +$240 per each additional dwelling up to 4 units Res/Comm $3,695 per plan up to 4 units OPTION 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration pending May 26th zoning administrative procedures review. REDUCE: Create tiered fees based on project complexity. TIMELINE: Phase in fees over 3 years A minor frontage improvement should not be charged like a major infrastructure project. Fees should distinguish, small residential, small commercial, and complex civil work. Hermosa Beach 5/12/26 | Fee Study Analysis | Page 5 Page 53 of 1002 Melinda Green Gould Ave., Hermosa Beach melindaatkinson@gmail.com Hermosa Beach City Council 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Opposition to Hermosa Beach Dog Park Proposal Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: I am writing to oppose placement of a dog park at Valley Park. I am an active community member, live on Gould Avenue, and will be directly impacted by the nuisance of a dog park and loss of valuable community space. A Dog Park will Negatively Impact Families The proposed location of Valley Park East will eliminate space that is currently utilized by my family for many purposes. During the summer, my daughter attends Valley Park Day Camp which utilizes that area for lawn games. Valley Park is one of the few affordable camp options in the area that offers full day coverage. My older son and his friends ride their mountain bikes in that area of the park frequently. My children participate in Scouting and that space is used for activities during campfires. All these activities will be eliminated or impacted by noise, smell of dog waste, and the inherent risk of unknown adults in close proximity with children. Hermosa Beach is facing a declining number of young families, which has created issues in reduced enrollment to local schools. A move by the Council to remove park space and place strangers with dogs next to a playground and school makes the City a less welcoming environment for families. A Dog Park Creates Safety Issues at Hermosa Vista School My understanding is that there has been no engagement with either the School Board or School District regarding placing a dog park in public space adjoining Vista School and parallel to a designated safe route to school. Many children at Vista are dropped off along Valley Drive and walk through the park unsupervised to ease traffic congestion. This proposal has those students walking directly next to a dog park. Many students also play in the playground after school which will be denigrated by noise and smell from the dog park. The proposed hours of the dog park are 7am to 8pm which occur during school hours. Staff acknowledged in the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee on March 6, 2026, that is Page 54 of 1002 not possible to limit park usage to Hermosa Beach residents, meaning there will be people from outside the community who enter Valley Park and are in proximity and sharing bathrooms with students from Hermosa Vista School and other children at the playground. There is no funding for a city staff member to monitor the safety issues caused by a dog park in Valley Park. A dog park will also exacerbate the parking shortage and traffic congestion in this area, which is already strained considerably by school drop offs and pickups. A Dog Park will Drain City Resources The report notes that an off-leash dog park will have initial capital costs and ongoing operation and maintenance costs including staff time. At the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee on March 6, 2026, it was noted that Manhattan Beach spends $84,000 per year on maintenance alone. That does not include staff time to monitor a dog park, respond to emergencies and complaints, the large initial cost of building of the dog park, and costs to upgrade the park. Bark for the Park suggests the city can redirect money from dog licenses and raise dog license fees to support a dog park. This ignores what money from dog licenses is currently funding and that it is insufficient to support a dog park. Bark for the Park also requests an exemption to allow corporate advertising on the dog park. Such signage is inappropriate in Valley Park. Bark for the Park estimates a cost of $72,000- $235,000 for the initial build of the dog park and attaches a generic “Appendix 3.0” which cites to no reliable sources supporting this estimate. I know this Council is well-informed on building costs to understand this amount is a gross underestimate. The City is facing the burden of funding significant capital projects – most notably the pier infrastructure – there is no room in the budget for a unnecessary expense requested by a small minority of residents who cannot be inconvenienced by traveling one mile to the neighboring dog parks. A Dog Park Creates Safety Issues1 Along with the funding issues, Bark for the Park suggests limiting the park to vaccinated dogs, spayed and neutered dogs, dogs above 4 months old, that are wearing a collar with ID tags. The only way to enforce this is with draining our limited staff resources. 1 The Bark for the Park Presentation cites frequently to a UC Davis Veterinary School study on dog parks in urban areas. The citation provided for this report is inoperable and it is not attached as an appendix. I could not find this study with a google search. I emailed the email address listed on Bark for the Park website to request a valid citation and they did not respond to me. Nor has anyone from Bark for the Park reached out to seek input from neighbors who will be directly impacted by the proposed dog park. Page 55 of 1002 In my experience, dog parks are full of poorly behaved dogs and negligent owners. Our dog trainer recommended against bringing our dog to a dog park. I have visited both the Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach dog parks and determined they are not safe spaces for myself or my dog. There are many options to exercise dogs, the best exercise for a dog and owner is to walk a dog, there are dog parks in neighboring cities (including a dog park one mile from Valley Park), and there are doggy day cares which allow dogs to play off leash for a nominal fee that covers ensuring the dogs are supervised and vaccinated. A Dog Park will Ruin the Character of Valley Park At the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee on March 6, 2026, a representative of Bark for the Park spoke and admitted that a dog park in Valley Park is a non-preferred location because it would “ruin the character of Valley Park.” Additionally, that the designer had concerns with Valley Park not being appropriate for a dog park. Despite these admissions, Bark for the Park is now advocating for a dog park in Valley Park with corporate sponsor signage as their top recommendation. Valley Park is the largest park in Hermosa Beach. It is beautiful, naturally sloped with trees and a garden. A dog park will create an eyesore that ruins the natural beauty of Valley Park with noise from barking dogs and the smell of dog waste. Hermosa Beach is a densely populated city with very little green space that should not be removed from broader public usage. A Dog Park at Valley Park Inconveniences Neighbors and Impacts Property Values A dog park in Valley Park is a significant inconvenience to neighbors. It will put up unsightly fencing, bring additional foot and car traffic, and create noise and smell issues. A dog park will decrease property values to homeowners in the area. Hermosa Beach does Not Need a Dog Park In a perfect world, Hermosa Beach would have plenty of outdoor space and funding for a dog park. But that is not the case. Resources – financial and environmental – are scarce. There are plenty of options for dogs to exercise and few spaces that have as much use to the community as Valley Park. Bark for the Park does not answer the simple question of “why is this needed?” There are plenty of options for dogs to play on and off leash within a few miles of Valley Park. I ask that the Council be realistic about the City’s needs and decide that a feasible location has not been identified for a dog park. If the City chooses to approve proceed with a comprehensive feasibility study, I ask for a location that is not in Valley Park. Sincerely, Melinda Green Page 56 of 1002 May 12, 2026 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers, On behalf of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, we appreciate the City’s work to update the User Fee Study and better understand the cost of providing municipal services. We recognize the City’s fiscal challenges, including the need to reduce unintended General Fund subsidies and improve long term financial sustainability. At the same time, we respectfully urge the City Council to review the proposed fee increases through a balanced economic development lens. A fee study is important because it shows what the current process costs. But it does not automatically answer whether the current process is efficient, appropriately tiered, or aligned with the City’s goals for commercial investment, small business growth, housing, events, activation, and long term recurring revenue. The Chamber supports responsible cost recovery. However, increasing fees without first streamlining the permitting and review process risks making it more expensive to invest in our City without improving the applicant experience or long term economic outcomes. Several proposed increases could directly affect business formation, tenant improvements, storefront visibility, mixed-use development, local events, public facing activation, and reinvestment in older commercial properties. Examples include: Fee Current Proposed Business Community Opinion S-001 CUP Commercial/Other $6,065 $12,800 Discourages business use approvals and expansion. Streamline and tier with an administrative review process based on complexity. S-004 PDP Commercial/Mixed Use $6,624 $9,125 Discourage mixed-use and investment in our commercial areas. Streamline and tier with an administrative review process based on complexity. S-008 Sign Variance $3,338 $7,980 Burden small businesses seeking visibility S-009 Parking Plan $5,596 $8,241 Needs tiers based on project size S-017 Mural Review $578 $3,010 Discourages beautification. Should be an Page 57 of 1002 administrative review. S-018 Temporary Use Permit $589 $1,900; date change $335 Discourages small activations and seasonal sales. Need a renewal fee tier for same annual event. Also, clarify why adding or changing a date needs to be so expensive. S-018A M-1 Zone Limited Events $520 $1,100 Discourages events that have low impact. S-030 Planning Sign Permit $795 $1,395 Adds cost to routine storefront improvements S-030A Planning A-Frame Sign Permit New $201; Renewal $121 New $250; Renewal $110 We support this fee increase S-033 Administrative Use Permit $621 $2,100 Significant increase for lower level approvals S-041 Preliminary Plan Review $161 $1,275-$2,43 0 Discourages early problem solving S-003B CUP Annual Monitoring - $570 Annually Needs clearer scope, applicability, and safeguards We are particularly concerned that some of these fees are based on current review pathways that may soon change. The staff report acknowledges that fees were calculated based on current processes and staff time, while also noting that the City is reviewing internal processes and may return with future adjustments as efficiencies are identified. The upcoming May 26th Zoning Administrative Procedures discussion may identify opportunities for expanded administrative approvals, reduced Planning Commission involvement, and streamlined review. For that reason, the Chamber respectfully recommends that Council defer full implementation of the most sensitive development and business facing fee increases until after the May 26th Zoning Administrative procedures discussion is completed and analyzed. We also ask Council to add S-004 Precise Development Plan for Commercial/Mixed Use projects to the list of fees requiring further review. If CUP/PDP condo fees and commercial CUP fees are being evaluated because they may be affected by process streamlining, then mixed-use and residential PDP fees should be reviewed as well. These applications directly affect housing feasibility, commercial revitalization, and long term property tax growth. The Chamber respectfully recommends the following actions: 1. Adopt a cost-recovery policy matrix before full implementation. Not every fee should automatically move toward full cost recovery. Council should distinguish between major private-benefit applications, small Page 58 of 1002 business activity, public-benefit improvements, appeals, signs, murals, events, and code cleanups. 2. Create tiered fees based on project complexity. A small tenant improvement, sign request, A-frame sign, seasonal sale, minor special event, four space parking plan, or routine small mixed use project should not be charged like a major discretionary development. 3. Defer and recalibrate fees that may be affected by administrative streamlining. Fees should be based on the cost of an efficient process, not simply the cost of the current process. 4. Preserve business activation and local events. Temporary Use Permits, M-1 Limited Events, seasonal sales, minor special events, and date changes should be reviewed through an economic development lens. These activities help businesses test ideas, attract customers, activate commercial areas, and generate sales activity. 5. Avoid duplicative sign-related fees. Planning Sign Permits, A-Frame Sign Permits, and A-Frame Encroachment Permits should be coordinated so businesses are not paying multiple fees for overlapping reviews of the same small business visibility tool. 6. Tie higher fees to measurable service improvements. If applicants are being asked to pay more, the City should report on turnaround times, time to first review, number of review cycles, backlog, Accela/customer-facing portal usage, and customer satisfaction. 7. Preserve affordable early consultation. Preliminary Plan Review should remain a tool that encourages applicants to engage early, reduce errors, and lower staff time downstream. If priced too high, applicants may avoid early guidance, which can increase costs for everyone. 8. Protect business-supportive and public-benefit activities. Fees for signs, murals, small business changes, temporary activations, and community-serving improvements should be reviewed through an economic development lens because they support storefront vitality, visitor experience, and local revenue generation. 9. Require a 6- and 12-month implementation review. Council should evaluate actual revenue, application volume, processing times, customer feedback, and whether higher fees are discouraging reinvestment, events, or business activity. Page 59 of 1002 Our City’s long term fiscal health will not be solved by fee revenue alone. It depends on encouraging private investment that grows recurring revenue through property tax, sales tax, business activity, visitor spending, and commercial district vitality. The Chamber supports the City’s goal of fiscal responsibility. But fiscal responsibility should include process reform, transparency, and accountability. The City should not make it more expensive to invest, activate, or do business in Hermosa before ensuring the process is faster, clearer, and more efficient. We respectfully urge Council to use this fee study as a starting point for better service delivery, not simply as a mechanism to raise fees. The strongest outcome would be a fee structure that supports cost recovery while also encouraging investment, reducing unnecessary process costs, and strengthening our City’s long term economic future. Respectfully, Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Bureau Page 60 of 1002 Dear City Council, I am writing to ask you offer the council chambers and its audio visual resources for the upcoming city council debates and record the debates and place the videos on the city's website. This is a pivotal election where voters will be asked whether they want to go in two very different directions; either to continue in the direction set by the Keegan/Saemann/Francois majority supported by a new City Manager OR return to the ways that Jackson, Detoy and former Councilman Massey ran the city Voters need every opportunity to hear these debates whether they can attend in person or not. I would also like to take a moment to remind the public what it was like under the PREVIOUS Massey/Jackson/Detoy majority, especially for those that dared to speak out in opposition to any of their policies. First the public was not allowed to speak remotely during general participation and that majority also reduced the speaker time from 3 minutes to 2 minutes. That was corrected by the new majority. Vitriolic attacks on public speakers were common with Massey & Jackson leading the charge. Just off the top of my head I remember completely unwarranted personal attacks on Kevin Cody (Easy Reader) John Burry and Elka Worner who now sits on the Parks Commission. Let remind you what it was like. --------- SUBJECT: Why Character and Respect Matter in our Upcoming Election As we approach the November election, I ask you to consider how Councilman Jackson and former Councilman Massey responded to public Page 61 of 1002 feedback during the November 2024 performance review of former City Manager Suja Lowenthal. THE CONTEXT: During the hearing, residents Tony Higgins and Laura Pena raised concerns regarding transparency, the failed sales tax measure, and the need for measurable performance metrics. They argued that public trust had been damaged and asked for more accountability. THE RESPONSE: Rather than addressing the substance of these concerns, the response from Jackson and Massey was dismissive and personal: Former Councilman Massey stated he gave public input "no weight," claiming critics "lack the ability to understand" how the city works and were being "dishonest." Councilman Jackson dismissed calls for transparency as "a load of crap" and a "pretext," labeling concerned residents as a "vocal minority" that the Council should not "cower" to. THE ISSUE: This isn't about rehashing old grievances—it’s about the future of our leadership. Councilman Jackson has a recurring pattern of attacking the messenger rather than engaging with the message. While there is reason to be optimistic about our city's new direction, we need leaders who view public engagement as a cornerstone of good governance, not just an annoyance. To finish the job of restoring community trust, we must hold our representatives accountable. Vote for respect and transparency this November. Let me also post a public statement by Nancy Schwappchek i scraped off the city website regarding Councilman Jacksons behavior. Hi! I'm Nancy Schwappach. I live on North Hermosa Avenue. Councilmember Jackson, you just have to stop with the gaslighting. In your recent Easy Reader letter to the editor, you again say Elka Warner, on the Page 62 of 1002 eve of 9/11, suggested that Hermosa Beach's government is worse than the Taliban. That is not what she said or even suggested. She said, as a female journalist covering the war in Afghanistan, she was able to have face-to-face interviews with members of the Taliban. In contrast, in her three years as a reporter for the Easy Reader, she was not able to obtain even one face-to-face meeting with a Hermosa Beach city official. That was a statement of fact. It was made in support of her concern that the city's proposed communication policy changes would stifle free speech and fair and open access to the press. The fact that we honor these fundamental rights and hold them so dear are among the reasons our enemies hate us.I am very grateful for your service and the service of all who've served in our armed forces, including those gentlemen and our first responders, including Councilmember Detoy. And I am so sorry for the loss that you sustained on 9/11 and in the aftermath. Many of us lost people on 9/11 and in the aftermath; it was horrible. However, Elka did not pick the date on which this item appeared on the City Council agenda—City Council did. So, you just have to stop. And I have to tell you, others were going to come speak and are afraid to, and I hesitated to do so. I know as soon as I sit down you can speak, can twist my words, and I have no right of rebuttal. I sincerely hope you dont do that. Respectfully - Please Stop - Thank You. Page 63 of 1002 Dear Hermosa Beach City Council Members, I am writing as a Hermosa Beach resident, neighbor, and dog owner to express my strong support for creating a dog park in Hermosa Beach, specifically at the proposed Valley Park East location. Hermosa Beach is a unique community. We are a small beach city where people know their neighbors, spend time outdoors, walk everywhere, and genuinely value community connection. We are also one of the most densely populated cities in California, with very limited private yard space for families and their dogs. Dogs are already deeply woven into the culture and daily life of Hermosa Beach. Walk down Pier Avenue toward the beach and you will notice water bowls sitting outside local businesses everywhere. That small detail says a lot about our town. Dogs are not treated like outsiders here — they are part of the community. I have met countless dog owners whose daily routines revolve around these neighborhood interactions — morning walks, conversations with neighbors, stops at local coffee shops, and visits to the fire station where many dogs know there is a treat container waiting for them. For many residents, these routines become part of the rhythm of living in Hermosa. Years ago, when my previous dog passed away, I realized something unexpected disappeared too: the small community I saw every day on our walks. The familiar faces, conversations, and connections that naturally formed around dog owners suddenly stopped overnight. It was a reminder that these spaces and routines are not just about pets — they are about people, relationships, and the sense of belonging that makes Hermosa Beach feel like home. I would strongly encourage members of the City Council to visit Live Oak Park early in the morning sometime. Talk to the dog owners there. Talk to the neighbors walking by. Ask people why they come back every day. What you will likely hear is that these spaces are about much more than dogs. They are about community. People meet neighbors they otherwise never would have known. New residents feel welcomed. Seniors have social interaction. Families gather. Friendships form. In many ways, these spaces become social anchors for a neighborhood — much like the community garden at South Park, where people connect through a shared outdoor space and create a stronger sense of community. When I first brought my puppy to Live Oak, the regulars had organized a “one-year-old puppy party” complete with treats and party hats. It was simple, local, friendly, and community-driven — exactly the kind of small-town beach city spirit that makes Hermosa Beach special. Page 64 of 1002 Hermosa Beach has proudly embraced the Blue Zones Project through the Beach Cities Health District, promoting walkability, outdoor activity, social connection, and community well-being. A thoughtfully designed dog park aligns naturally with many of those same values. Dog ownership encourages daily movement, outdoor time, and regular social interaction between neighbors. For many residents, walking their dog is one of the most consistent forms of exercise and community engagement in their daily lives. Creating a dedicated space for residents and their dogs to gather would support not only pets, but also the physical, mental, and social well-being goals that Hermosa Beach has already publicly embraced through the Blue Zones initiative. At the same time, Hermosa Beach’s current approach toward dogs is almost entirely centered around regulation, fees, and enforcement. The City requires annual dog licensing, charges substantial licensing fees and penalties, and increased off-leash fines to $250 per violation. I fully understand and support the importance of animal control services, licensing, rabies compliance, and responsible enforcement. These are important public safety functions. However, Hermosa Beach currently offers no designated off-leash recreational space anywhere in the city for responsible dog owners in one of the densest communities in California. Dog owners already contribute significantly through annual licensing fees, permit fees, penalties, and enforcement costs. Yet unlike many other recreational amenities supported through general community funding, dog owners are effectively asked to fund regulation without receiving meaningful recreational infrastructure in return. A thoughtfully designed dog park would not only serve dog owners, but also strengthen the broader community by creating another safe, outdoor gathering space that encourages social connection, physical activity, and neighborhood interaction. It could also create opportunities to support local small businesses and community organizations through sponsorships and partnerships involving local veterinarians, dog walkers, trainers, pet sitters, boarding facilities, adoption groups, rescue organizations, and other local pet-related businesses. Instead of simply being a fenced area for dogs, it could become another positive community gathering space that supports local connections and local businesses. The proposed Valley Park East location appears to be a thoughtful and balanced solution: ● It uses a relatively underutilized portion of the park. ● It represents only a small percentage of the total park space. ● It minimizes neighborhood impact due to its location and natural buffering. ● It includes nearby parking, shade, restrooms, and room for separate large and small dog areas. A dog park is still public green space. It remains a place where residents gather outdoors, exercise, and build community ties. Page 65 of 1002 I understand there are concerns regarding noise, cleanliness, and environmental impact. Those concerns deserve thoughtful planning and responsible management. But many nearby communities have successfully addressed these same issues while creating safe and valuable public spaces for residents and their pets. Hermosa Beach has always been a city built around lifestyle, community, and outdoor living. A thoughtfully designed dog park aligns naturally with those values and serves a large segment of residents who already contribute through licensing fees, compliance, and community involvement. More than 1,400 residents have already expressed support for a dog park, with many supporting the Valley Park location. That level of support reflects a real community need. I respectfully encourage the City Council to continue moving this project forward and to support the creation of a safe, well-designed dog park for Hermosa Beach residents and their dogs. Thank you for your time, consideration, and service to our community. Sincerely, Dave Andrews Page 66 of 1002 6 p.m. Open Public Comment I have lived within 100 feet to more than a dozen STRs for years in the early 2000s, and later operated one myself from 2010 until the 2016 residential ban. That gives me direct experience with both sides of this issue, as a neighbor and as an operator. I am not speaking only from theory. I am here for the four-way win. Win for the City through TOT revenue during our budget crisis. Win for neighbors through enforceable rules and limits. Win for visitors who need family lodging options beyond small hotel rooms. Win for responsible homeowners facing financial hardship, including people like me living on full disability. California SB-346 has been available since the start of this year. It allows cities to opt in by ordinance to require platforms to provide all identifying information for TOT, licensing, and enforcement. I have yet to see an opt-in ordinance on the agenda. This could have been in place months ago. Hermosa currently have hundreds of STR listings reported by AirDNA while the ban was supposedly in place, yet the City has not shown a matching history of widespread party-house, noise, or nuisance problems. Manhattan Beach is the nearby comparison with a roughly comparable Coastal Zone has under 200 licensed STRs without a cap. In response to my records request, Manhattan Beach found only one STR complaint after the ban was overturned: no license and unpaid TOT. No STR noise complaints in four years. Party houses are a behavior problem, not an STR problem. Hermosa already has enforceable noise, nuisance, trash, parking, and safety rules for everyone. The 2016 ban followed only six STR complaints in 2015. How many noise complaints came from homeowners and long-term renters during that time? I do have a concern is outside speculators buying up homes only to convert them to STRs. A waiting period of 3-5 years should thwart that possibility, and I believe that could be easily approved by the Commission. Do not expect an explosion of STRs when they are allowed. We already have two examples. First, Hermosa allowed STRs in the Commercial Zone, yet only a handful obtained licenses. Second, Manhattan Beach has had Coastal Zone STRs since Keen in 2022, without a cap, and still has fewer than 200 licensed STRs. Why? Most homeowners want to live in their homes or keep good long-term tenants. Running an STR is expensive, time-intensive, and is a pain to operate It requires furnishing, housewares supplies, cleaning, guest management, frequent repairs, and constant review pressure. In closing: License STRs. Collect TOT. Use SB 346 to enforce licensing and TOT. Protect neighbors with reasonable density caps. Prevent speculation. Enforce nuisance rules. Revoke bad actors. Do not keep pretending the only choice is a blanket ban. Page 67 of 1002 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 28, 2026 5:00 p.m. Council Chambers 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Members Present: Councilmember Rob Saemann, Mayor Mike Detoy, Councilmember Ray Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Michael D. Keegan, Councilmember Dean Francois Staff Present: City Manager Steve Napolitano, Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore, Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker, City Clerk Martha Alvarez, Community Development Director Alison Becker, Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols, Public Works Director Joe SanClemente, Police Chief Landon Phillips, Interim Deputy City Clerk Ariana Rodriguez _____________________________________________________________________ 1.CALL TO ORDER— STUDY SESSION Mayor Detoy called the Open Session to order at 5:01 p.m. 2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by City Treasurer David Pederson. 3.ROLL CALL City Clerk Martha Alvarez led the roll call and announced a quorum. 4.PUBLIC COMMENT Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke: •Ira Ellnan (In Person) •Tony Higgins (Virtual) Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. 5.OPENING REMARKS Page 68 of 1002 2 (City Manager Steve Napolitano) City Manager Steve Napolitano provided opening remarks regarding Budget Study Session. 6. OVERVIEW OF 2026-27 BUDGET (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) • Purpose and outlook • Fiscal Year 2026-27 status • Revenue and expenditure trends • Forecast and challenges • Revenue options and department strategies • Budget calendar and process City Manager Steve Napolitano introduced Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker. Administrative Services Director Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation. 7. COUNCIL QUESTIONS City Manager Steve Napolitano, Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore, and Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker responded to City Council questions. 8. PUBLIC COMMENT ON OVERVIEW OF 2026-27 BUDGET Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke: • John *** (In Person) • Jim Holtz (Virtual) • Courtney R. (In Person) • Laura P. (In Person) • Eric Horne (In Person) Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. At 6:15 p.m. Mayor Detoy recessed the Budget Study Session. 9. COUNCIL DISCUSSION Page 69 of 1002 3 At 9:59 PM, the Budget Study Session reconvened with all City Councilmembers present. City Clerk Martha Alvarez led roll call. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments, seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments Mayor Detoy provided a brief overview of the Budget Study Session. Administrative Services Director Walker responded to City Council questions. Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann Motion to authorize a variance to extend the City Manager's budget delivery deadline from May 15, 2026, to May 30, 2026. Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 10. ADJOURNMENT At 10:01 p.m., Mayor Detoy adjourned the meeting. Page 70 of 1002 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 28, 2026 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Members Present: Councilmember Rob Saemann, Mayor Mike Detoy, Councilmember Ray Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Michael D. Keegan, Councilmember Dean Francois Staff Present: City Manager Steve Napolitano, Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore, City Clerk Martha Alvarez, Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols, Public Works Director Joe SanClemente, Interim Deputy City Clerk Ariana Rodriguez, Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker, Police Chief Landon Phillips, Community Development Director Alison Becker _____________________________________________________________________ 1. OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM Mayor Detoy called the Open Session to order at 6:25 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by U.S. Women's National Ice Hockey Team Head Coach John Wroblewski. 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Martha Alvarez led roll call. Present: Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann 4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT There was no closed session. 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS Councilmember Saemann announced the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club’s 100th birthday celebration on May 9, 2026, at noon at 2515 Valley Drive, noting it will be a community celebration rather than a fundraiser and would include music, food, and prizes. Page 71 of 1002 2 Councilmember Francois announced his next Community Forum for Monday, May 4, 2026, from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., describing it as an informal public discussion with refreshments. Mayor Detoy announced that Hermosa Beach Little League’s annual Night in the Ballpark would take place Saturday, May 2, 2026, beginning at 5:00 p.m. at Clark Field. 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA This is the time for the City Council to discuss any changes to the order of agenda items. Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann Motion to approve the agenda. Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 7. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS 7.a RECOGNIZING U.S. WOMEN’S NATIONAL ICE HOCKEY TEAM HEAD COACH JOHN WROBLEWSKI Mayor Detoy on behalf of the City Council presented a proclamation of recognition to U.S. Women's National Ice Hockey Team Head Coach and Hermosa Beach resident, John Wroblewski. Mayor Detoy further noted that John lead the U.S. Women's National Ice Hockey Team to a gold medal in the 2026 Winter Olympics and for his broader achievements in international hockey. Also highlighted the recipients local involvement as a Little League father and coach. 7.b RECOGNIZING HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB FOR 100 YEARS OF COMMUNITY SERVICE Mayor Detoy and Councilmember Saemann on behalf of the City Council presented a proclamation of recognition to the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club for 100 years of service to the community. The Mayor noted the club’s long history in Hermosa Beach, its support for youth and community causes, and the significance of its centennial. Lieutenant Governor for Kiwanis International Division 19 Richard Tyler, accepted the proclamation and presented the City of Hermosa Beach with a certificate of appreciation for 100 years of collaboration and support of the Kiwanis Club’s mission. 8. PUBLIC COMMENT Page 72 of 1002 3 Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke: • Ira E. - Public Records Requests and City survey (In-Person) • Carla Buck - Dog Park (Virtual) Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. 9. CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS Mayor Detoy asked for clarification regarding the City survey. City Manager Steve Napolitano provided an update and confirmed that the results will return at a future City Council meeting. 10. UPDATES ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITIES This is the time for members of the City Council to report on their attendance at ad hoc subcommittees or standing committee meetings, conferences, or other official activities as City representatives. Councilmember Dean Francois reported that he had attended the South Bay Cities Sanitation District Board meeting two weeks earlier. He noted that rate increases would be discussed at the next meeting and stated that he would advocate against an increase if possible, though he indicated that an increase appeared likely. 11. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Francois requested a "No" Vote under Agenda Item No. 11.j, concerning vending on public beaches. He stated that while he had supported limited vending related to specific events such as volleyball tournaments, he opposed opening vending to all beach events and believed the policy was inconsistent with the spirit of the Coastal Act. Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson Motion to approve the Consent Calendar and register a "No" Vote under Agenda Item No. 11.j, for Councilmember Francois. Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 11.a WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA Page 73 of 1002 4 Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson To waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived. Motion Carried 11.b CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES (City Clerk Martha Alvarez) Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson To approve the minutes of the April 14, 2026 regular meeting. Motion Carried 11.c CASH BALANCE REPORT - 26-AS-047 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson To receive and file the January 2026 and February 2026 Cash Balance Reports. Motion Carried 11.d CITY TREASURER’S REPORT - 26-AS-048 (City Treasurer Dave Pedersen) Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson To receive and file the March 2026 City Treasurer’s Report. Motion Carried 11.e APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH NETRIX, LLC. FOR DATA BACK- UP SERVICES - 26-CMO-022 (GIS/IT Analyst Alex Hildebrand). Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson Page 74 of 1002 5 To approve an agreement with Netrix, LLC. for data back-up services for a three-year term for a total not-exceed-amount of $121,742; and authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed agreement, approve minor modifications if necessary, with the City Clerk attesting the attached agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney. Motion Carried 11.f REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR JANUARY AND FEBRUARY 2026 - 26-AS-049 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson To receive and file the January and February 2026 Financial Reports. Motion Carried 11.g CHECK REGISTERS - 26-AS-050 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson To receive and file the check registers for April 8, 2026 through April 16, 2026. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands. Motion Carried 11.h CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF April 16, 2026 - 26-PW-021 (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson To receive and file the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of April 16, 2026. Motion Carried 11.i RATIFY LETTER OF SUPPORT IF AMENDED FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 2741 HOUSING ELEMENT: INVENTORY OF LAND: SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE - 26-CMO-023 Page 75 of 1002 6 (Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo) Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson To ratify a letter of support if amended for Assembly Bill 2741 sent on April 20, 2026. Motion Carried 11.j ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 12.30 (SPECIAL EVENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY) AND SECTION 12.20.300 (SOLICITATION) OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE - 26-PR-023 CEQA: The proposed ordinance is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378 (b)(5) as it is an organization or administrative activity of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) The recommendation for this item was approved on the Consent Calendar by Majority Vote with Councilmember Francois registering a "No" Vote. Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson To determine that the proposed ordinance is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), as it constitutes an organizational or administrative activity of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; waive full reading and adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 12.30 (Special Events on Public Property) and Section 12.20.300 (Solicitation) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to allow for the sale of prepared food, nonalcoholic beverages, and/or merchandise on the beach by special event-associated vendors; and direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance. Ayes (4): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Noes (1): Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 12. PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M 12.a PUBLIC HEARING-RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FROM A FEE STUDY UPDATE - 26-AS-025 Page 76 of 1002 7 Continued from meeting of April 14, 2026 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Administrative Services Director Brendan Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation. Administrative Services Director Walker, City Manager Steve Napolitano, Planning Manager Alexis Oropeza, Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore, Public Works Director Joseph SanClemente, and Police Chief Landon Phillips responded to the City Council questions. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke: • Tony Higgins (Virtual) • Alan J. (In-Person) • Jon D. (In-Person) • Laura Pena (In-Person) • Maggie Bove-LaMadhi (In-Person) • Eric Horne (In-Person) • Elka Warner (In-Person) Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. Administrative Services Director Walker and Interim Baltimore provided clarification. Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann Motion to pull multiple identified fee categories from the proposed Master Fee Schedule for separate review and further analysis, and to proceed with discussion on the remaining fees. This motion remained on the floor but was not acted upon following a substitute motion. The following line items were requested to be removed and considered at a later City Council meeting: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan: S001 (Conditional Use Permit - Comm/Other), S003 (CUP/PDP - Condo), S003B (CUP Annual Monitoring), S004A (Coastal Approval In-Concept), S006 (Zone Change), S007 (Variance), S009 (Parking Plan), S013 (Final Map), S017 (Mural Review), S018 (Temporary Use Permit), S024 (Planning Commission Interpretation), S030 (Planning Sign Permit), S030A (Planning A-Frame Sign Permit), Page 77 of 1002 8 S034 (Admin Permit - Abandon CUP), S040 (Appeal to the City Council), S080 (Residential Encroachment Permit) Councilmember Jackson: None, agreed with the list provided by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan. Councilmember Saemann: Requested to add S008 (Sign Variance). Councilmember Francois: Did not have any additional requests. Mayor Detoy: Requested to add S018A (M-1 Zone Limited Events Permit), S081C (A-Frame Encroachment Permit). Substitute Motion Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Councilmember Francois Motion to approve the fee updates in concept except for the specific fee items pulled for further review by the City Council, and to phase in the approved fee increases over two years, with the third year reserved for review. Ayes (4): Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Noes (1): Councilmember Saemann Motion Carried Interim City Attorney Baltimore, Administrative Services Director, and City Manager Napolitano provided clarification and responded to City Council questions. At 8:30 PM, Mayor Detoy re-opened the Public Hearing. Moved by: Mayor Detoy Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion to continue the public hearing on Item 12.a, as to the items pulled for further review, to the May 12, 2026, City Council meeting. Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 12.b ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION AMENDING SECTION 3.12 PURCHASING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) At 8:31 p.m., Mayor Detoy opened the Public Hearing. Page 78 of 1002 9 City Manager Steve Napolitano confirmed that the public hearing for this item is being continued to the May 26, 2026, City Council meeting. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. Moved by: Councilmember Francois Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson Motion to continue the public hearing for Agenda Item 12.b to the May 26, 2026, City Council meeting. Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 13. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 13.a REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FALLEN TORRANCE POLICE DETECTIVE GARY ELTON RIPPSTEIN MEMORIAL SIGN INSTALLATION LOCATED AT 8TH STREET AND ARDMORE AVENUE - 26-CMO-021 (City Manager Steve Napolitano) Management Analyst Leo Zalyan provided the PowerPoint presentation. Police Chief Landon Phillips and Torrance Police Chief Robert Dunn provided a brief statement regarding the request. Police Chief Phillips, Management Analyst Zalyan, and Torrance Police Chief Dunn responded to the City Council questions. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. Public Works Director Joseph SanClemente and Torrance Police Chief Dunn responded to City Council questions. Moved by: Councilmember Saemann Seconded by: Mayor Detoy Motion to approve the installation of a memorial sign commemorating fallen Torrance Police Detective Gary Elton Rippstein at the intersection of 8th Street and Ardmore Avenue, using the replacement pole in that location and with a smaller sign format. Page 79 of 1002 10 Ayes (4): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Francois Noes (1): Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion Carried 13.b ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT A SIDE LETTER TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE GENERAL AND SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES’ BARGAINING UNIT TEAMSTERS LOCAL 986 - 26-AS- 051 (Human Resources Manager Tyler Cashman) Human Resources Manager Tyler Cashman provided the PowerPoint presentation. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson Motion to adopt Resolution No. RES-26-7546, approving a Side Letter to the MOU between the City of Hermosa Beach and the General and Supervisory Employees’ Bargaining Unit, Teamsters Local 986, for the period of July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2028. Motion Carried City Manager Steve Napolitano provided clarification that City Council needed to return to the Public Hearing Agenda Item Nos. 12.a and 12.b. 13.c CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO ESTABLISH MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH LITTLE LEAGUE FOR CLARK FIELD IMPROVEMENTS - 26-PW-022 (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Public Works Director Joseph SanClemente provided the PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke: • Tony Higgins (Virtual) Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. Page 80 of 1002 11 Mark Mamber thanked staff for their work and getting the MOU to this point. Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann Motion to consider approval of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Hermosa Beach Little League (HBLL) to advance Clark Field improvements to be funded, designed, and constructed by HBLL; and authorize the City Manager to execute the MOU, approve minor non- substantive modifications if necessary, subject to approval by the City Attorney. Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 13.d RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING NEW CATEGORY AND FEE FOR COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT AREAS - 26-CMO-019 (Environmental Programs Douglas Krauss) Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss provided the PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke: • Betty Gregorian (In-Person) • Voc Gregorian (In-Person) - Provided the City Clerk with signatures that were received and incorporated into the record. • Mark D. Warshaw (In-Person) • Ira Ellman (In-Person) • Alan J.(In-Person) • John D. (In-Person) • Andrew G. (In-Person) • Laura (In-Person) Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore and City Manager Steve Napolitano provided clarification and responded to City Council questions. Page 81 of 1002 12 Moved by: Councilmember Jackson Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann Motion to direct staff to return with a modified resolution that maintains the approved encroachment fee framework for commercial zones but excludes commercial activity located in residential zones, with all other portions of the resolution and fee schedule remaining approved. Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 13.e AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR ON- CALL VEHICLE OUTFITTING SERVICES - 26-AS-024 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation. Administrative Services Director Walker, Police Chief Landon Phillips, City Manager Steve Napolitano, and Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore responded to City Council questions. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Francois Motion to award professional services agreements for on-call vehicle outfitting services to Commline, Inc., Derotic Emergency Equipment, A Vector Company, and 10-33 Industries, Ltd., each in an amount not-to- exceed $1,000,000 for a term ending April 14, 2031, and to authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements with minor modifications subject to City Attorney approval. The motion carried by voice vote, with support from the full Council. Motion Carried Additional direction was given to staff to review the South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority (RCC) contract and pursue improvements before relying on the new bench of vendors where possible. 14. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Page 82 of 1002 13 This is the time for Councilmembers to schedule future agenda items and to ask questions about the status of previously approved future agenda items. No discussion, debate, or public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The tentative future agenda items document is provided for information only. Councilmember Francois asked that the May 12, 2026, agenda item regarding Assembly Bill 1942 include information on the Cal Cities position recommending inclusion of Class 1, 2, and 3 electric bicycles. City Manager Steve Napolitano responded to City Council questions and provided clarification. Councilmember Francois requested support for a future agenda item to review the City’s sidewalk vending permit program, including where permits are being issued, how the fees are structured, and how the system is being administered. The request did not receive City Council support. Mayor Pro Tem Keegan requested that, as part of future discussions with the City of Redondo Beach regarding fire services, staff also seek information regarding dispatch service pricing so the City could compare potential costs and savings. Support was expressed for obtaining that information as part of the fire services discussion. Councilmember Saemann concurred. City Manager Napolitano provided clarification and responded to City Council questions. Mayor Pro Tem Keegan also requested a future action item to consider rescinding the City’s current Coastal Development Permit application regarding short-term rentals and to bring back potential regulations that would expand short-term rental opportunities in the coastal zone and throughout the City, including comparisons to other coastal cities and their enforcement structures. The request received support from Councilmember Saemann and Councilmember Francois to return as an action item. City Manager Napolitano provided clarification and responded to City Council questions. 14.a TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 26-CMO-025 Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information. This item was received and filed by order of the Chair. 15. CITY MANAGER REPORT No report from City Manager Steve Napolitano. 16. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Page 83 of 1002 14 This is reserved for items that do not require City Council action. The City Council may request a future agenda item to discuss an informational item. Otherwise, discussion of informational items will not be taken. 16.a ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 3, 2026 (Parks & Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) This item was received and filed by order of the Chair. 16.b ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 17, 2026 (Community Development Director Alison Becker) This item was received and filed by order of the Chair. 16.c POLICE CRIME STATISTICS FOR FEBRUARY 2026 (Police Chief Landon Philips) This item was received and filed by order of the Chair. 16.d POLICE CRIME STATISTICS FOR MARCH 2026 (Police Chief Landon Philips) This item was received and filed by order of the Chair. 17. ADJOURNMENT At 9:55 p.m., Mayor Detoy adjourned the meeting to the May 12, 2026, Closed Session at 5:00 p.m. Page 84 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-AS-055 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CHECK REGISTERS (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for April 22, 2026 through April 29, 2026. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands. Attachments: 1. Check Register 4/22/2026 2. Check Register 4/23/2026 3. Check Register 4/29/2026 Respectfully Submitted by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 85 of 1002 04/22/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 2:10:54PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111903 4/22/2026 ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC.2602 ACOUSTIC CONSULTANT SVS - CLARK BLDG21386 301-8689-4201 5,869.78 POST CONST ACOUSTIC SURVEY@CLARK BLDG2893 301-8689-4201 1,995.00 Total : 7,864.7821386 111904 4/22/2026 ALL AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION 25-33.05 KELLY COURTS IMPROVEMENTS/MAR2623965 301-8619-4201 88,149.30 Total : 88,149.3023965 111905 4/22/2026 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT PS-INV105351 CROSSING GUARD SERVICE/3.29-4.11.2606827 146-2102-4201 9,238.52 Total : 9,238.5206827 111906 4/22/2026 AM-TEC TOTAL SECURITY INC 646601 QUARTERLY CAMERA MAINTENANCE23279 715-2101-4201 2,500.00 Total : 2,500.0023279 111907 4/22/2026 ANDERSON, PAUL W Parcel 4184 011 024 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE/202515685 001-6871 147.35 105-3105 24.61 Total : 171.9615685 111908 4/22/2026 ANTHONY'S AUTO DETAILING APR26 CAR WASHES FOR PATROL VEHICLES/APR2624027 715-2101-4311 640.00 Total : 640.0024027 111909 4/22/2026 AQUA FLO SI2710868 MR#989988 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES09366 001-4204-4201 565.70 MR#989987 IRRIGATION SUPPLIESSI2728305 001-6101-4309 579.09 Total : 1,144.7909366 111910 4/22/2026 AT&T MOBILITY 287298411168X0410202 PD&CSO CELL PHONES/LPR CAMERAS/MAR2613361 001-2101-4201 119.60 001-2101-4304 1,062.76 001-3302-4304 91.04 Total : 1,273.4013361 Page 86 of 1002 04/22/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 2:10:54PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111911 4/22/2026 AVILA, PAUL PO45506 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT - SPRING 202623877 001-1204-4317 2,473.00 Total : 2,473.0023877 111912 4/22/2026 BOARD UP BOYS HB03 EMERGENCY BOARDUP24105 001-2101-4201 550.00 Total : 550.0024105 111913 4/22/2026 BURGOS, CARLOS TR1223 REIMB - PARKING EXPO HOTEL18635 001-3302-4317 821.09 Total : 821.0918635 111914 4/22/2026 CAHALAN, ERIC PO45507 SUMMER 2026 TUITION ADVANCE13157 001-2101-4317 3,252.67 Total : 3,252.6713157 111915 4/22/2026 CANTEEN SOC324256 PD COFFEE SERVICE/APR2623324 001-2101-4305 29.85 001-2101-4306 29.86 Total : 59.7123324 111916 4/22/2026 CENTERS OF CA, A MEDICAL CORP, OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH90523995 PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS 4.1-4.2.2623578 001-1203-4320 436.00 Total : 436.0023578 111917 4/22/2026 DFM ASSOCIATES PO45529 2026 CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS CODE BOOKS00726 001-1121-4305 225.23 Total : 225.2300726 111918 4/22/2026 DOCUSIGN, INC.111100631816 DOCUSIGN ANNUAL FEE21807 715-1206-4201 3,706.56 Total : 3,706.5621807 111919 4/22/2026 EMERGENCY RESPONSE CRIME SCENE T2026-279 BIOHAZARD CLEAN UP SERVICE 4.7.2616922 001-2101-4201 3,200.00 Total : 3,200.0016922 111920 4/22/2026 ENCODEPLUS, LLC 3451 ORDINANCE CODIFCATION SERVICE22221 715-1206-4201 1,342.00 ORDINANCE CODIFCATION SERVICE3453 Page 87 of 1002 04/22/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 2:10:54PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111920 4/22/2026 (Continued)ENCODEPLUS, LLC22221 715-1206-4201 198.00 Total : 1,540.0022221 111921 4/22/2026 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 109-1120426 MR#472199 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PARTS22926 715-3302-4311 214.17 MR#472053 REFUND CORE FEE109-1120578 715-3302-4311 -9.00 MR#472197 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PARTS109-1120906 715-2101-4311 124.62 MR#472198 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PARTS12-7113307 715-2101-4311 68.02 Total : 397.8122926 111922 4/22/2026 FRONTIER 209-188-4669-0714985 LANDLINES/COMPUTER LINKS/APR2619884 001-3302-4304 130.32 001-3304-4304 82.00 001-1204-4304 143.12 715-1206-4304 1,754.15 001-2101-4304 1,323.87 001-4204-4321 438.85 001-4202-4304 144.55 Total : 4,016.8619884 111923 4/22/2026 FRONTIER 310-372-6186-0831895 2ND FL CITY HALL FAX LINE/APR2619884 001-1121-4304 29.44 001-1141-4304 29.44 001-1201-4304 29.44 001-1202-4304 29.44 001-1203-4304 29.44 Total : 147.2019884 111924 4/22/2026 FRONTIER 310-379-0652-1216195 EOC LANDLINES/APR2619884 001-1201-4304 141.66 Total : 141.6619884 111925 4/22/2026 GUILLEN, JESSICA TR1293 PER DIEM - FIELD TRAINING MAY 4-8 202622893 001-2101-4317 275.00 Total : 275.0022893 Page 88 of 1002 04/22/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 2:10:54PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111926 4/22/2026 HAUSLE, JAMES Parcel 4183 021 014 STREET LIGHT TAX REBATE/202522620 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.6122620 111927 4/22/2026 KITU SYSTEMS, INC.1961 EV CHARGER REPLACEMENT GUN20320 001-4204-4201 329.25 Total : 329.2520320 111928 4/22/2026 LA SUPERIOR COURT - TORRANCE PO45537 CITATION PAYMENT SURCHARGES/MAR2600118 001-3302 47,386.70 Total : 47,386.7000118 111929 4/22/2026 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 318400 PERSONNEL LEGAL SVS/PD/FEB2602175 001-1203-4201 824.50 PERSONNEL LEGAL SVS/FAULK/FEB26318401 001-1203-4201 17,755.00 PERSONNEL LEGAL SVS/GENERAL/FEB26318402 001-1203-4201 2,447.00 PERSONNEL LEGAL SVS/GENERAL/MAR26320877 001-1203-4201 582.00 Total : 21,608.5002175 111930 4/22/2026 LOEZA, JOANNE TR1258 REIMB - AXON CONFERENCE EXPENSES22925 001-2101-4317 1,444.65 Total : 1,444.6522925 111931 4/22/2026 MALINOWSKI, JOSEPH M Parcel 4187 015 026 STREET LIGHT TAX REBATE/202516556 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.6116556 111932 4/22/2026 MARTIN CHEVROLET 43417-1 MR#472196 FLEET MAINTENANCE PARTS15912 715-2101-4311 26.95 Total : 26.9515912 111933 4/22/2026 MCDERMOTT, GARRETT TR1257 REIMB - AXON CONFERENCE EXPENSES16613 001-2101-4317 1,406.32 Total : 1,406.3216613 111934 4/22/2026 NV5, INC 504975 GREENWICH VILLAGE UUAD/FEB2621033 313-8114-4201 23,055.50 Page 89 of 1002 04/22/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 2:10:54PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 23,055.50 111934 4/22/2026 NV5, INC21033 111935 4/22/2026 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 464719005001 MAT REQ 473282/OFFICE SUPPLIES13114 001-4202-4305 32.99 MAT REQ 473282/OFFICE SUPPLIES464719238001 001-4202-4305 45.03 MAT REQ 782616/OFFICE SUPPLIES465199850001 001-2101-4305 75.03 MAT REQ 473278/OFFICE SUPPLIES465743863001 001-4202-4305 19.95 MAT REQ 473278/OFFICE SUPPLIES465744038001 001-4202-4305 64.57 MAT REQ 473279/OFFICE SUPPLIES465747567001 001-4202-4305 39.38 MAT REQ 473279/OFFICE SUPPLIES465747894001 001-4202-4305 25.33 Total : 302.2813114 111936 4/22/2026 ORTIZ, KATHERINE TR1094 PER DIEM - FIELD TRAINING MAY 4-8 202623241 001-2101-4317 275.00 Total : 275.0023241 111937 4/22/2026 PARS 60145 ALT RETIREMENT PLAN ADMIN FEES/FEB2614693 001-2101-4185 15.48 001-4201-4185 150.91 001-4202-4185 27.08 Total : 193.4714693 111938 4/22/2026 POWERDMS, INC.INV-156382 CA ACCREDITATION FOR PUB SAFETY18049 001-2101-4305 400.00 Total : 400.0018049 111939 4/22/2026 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY Cust#1275405 YARD UNIFORMS, TOWELS, & MATS/MAR2617676 001-2101-4309 77.06 001-3104-4309 86.92 001-3302-4309 69.36 001-4202-4314 444.06 001-4204-4309 156.20 715-4206-4309 54.00 Page 90 of 1002 04/22/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 2:10:54PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 887.60 111939 4/22/2026 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY17676 111940 4/22/2026 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF 584923 CITY PROSECUTOR SERVICES/MAR2603282 001-1132-4201 18,444.00 Total : 18,444.0003282 111941 4/22/2026 REGIONAL TAP SERVICE CENTER 6026846 BUS PASS SALES/FEB2620061 001-1204-4251 9.60 Total : 9.6020061 111942 4/22/2026 SBCU VISA PO45558 J CORDOVA CC STATEMENT - MAR2603353 001-3301-4309 430.98 105-2601-4309 44.97 001-6101-4309 131.08 715-4204-4201 332.26 001-3104-4309 133.54 161-3109-4309 31.78 001-3104-4201 996.97 001-6101-4201 1,028.25 715-4206-4309 1,238.67 001-4202-4305 28.29 001-4204-4309 233.71 001-4204-4201 3,556.78 715-2101-4311 814.35 E CAHALAN CC STATEMENT - MAR26PO45568 001-2101-4201 263.24 001-2101-4305 1,033.44 001-2101-4306 56.02 J POELSTRA CC STATEMENT - MAR26PO45571 001-2101-4317 3,137.52 001-2101-4305 104.03 001-2101-4317 1,124.22 001-2101-4305 123.65 001-2101-4317 1,334.71 001-2101-4305 90.15 001-2101-4317 405.25 Total : 16,673.8603353 111943 4/22/2026 SENTZ, PORNPIMOL Parcel 4185 023 044 STREET LIGHT TAX REBATE/202517932 Page 91 of 1002 04/22/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 2:10:54PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111943 4/22/2026 (Continued)SENTZ, PORNPIMOL17932 105-3105 24.61 Total : 24.6117932 111944 4/22/2026 STERICYCLE 8014026032 MEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL/MAY2610412 001-2101-4201 74.90 Total : 74.9010412 111945 4/22/2026 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIO INV109349 PD COUNSELING SERVICES - MAR2620121 001-1203-4201 170.00 Total : 170.0020121 111946 4/22/2026 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC 045-558395 ERP SOFTWARE CONVERSION 3.23-3.26.2605626 715-1206-4201 2,608.00 ERP SOFTWARE CONVERSION 3.25.26045-558396 715-1206-4201 652.00 Total : 3,260.0005626 111947 4/22/2026 VORTEX INDUSTRIES, LLC 07-2246836 REMOVE&REPLACE DOORS&FRAMES @LOT C24052 301-8699-4201 19,724.65 Total : 19,724.6524052 111948 4/22/2026 WESTERN GRAPHIX 61498 ID BADGES FOR EMPLOYEES02873 001-1203-4201 798.80 Total : 798.8002873 3337810 4/6/2026 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Acct Ending 5596 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/MAR26~03432 001-3104-4201 1,849.27 001-3104-4309 1,172.56 001-4204-4309 735.22 001-6101-4309 200.15 105-2601-4309 268.17 001-4204-4201 -155.23 001-3104-4201 1,132.42 001-4204-4201 25.97 001-4204-4309 1,380.73 001-6101-4309 54.98 001-2021 118.41 001-2022 -118.41 Attachment 1Page 92 of 1002 04/22/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 2:10:54PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 6,664.24 3337810 4/6/2026 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES03432 31724878 4/16/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 700057262780 ELECTRICITY/MAR2600159 105-2601-4303 136.01 Total : 136.0100159 31725407 4/16/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 700156101336 ELECTRICITY/MAR2600159 001-6101-4303 375.73 001-4204-4303 16,496.81 Total : 16,872.5400159 31725817 4/16/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 700222378305 ELECTRICITY/MAR2600159 001-6101-4303 3,094.97 Total : 3,094.9700159 31725887 4/16/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 700234897163 ELECTRICITY/MAR2600159 001-3304-4303 1,934.29 Total : 1,934.2900159 31726234 4/16/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 700296306651 ELECTRICITY/MAR2600159 105-2601-4303 15.38 Total : 15.3800159 31726290 4/16/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 700304673105 ELECTRICITY/MAR2600159 160-3102-4201 101.24 Total : 101.2400159 31726330 4/22/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 700313445137 ELECTRICITY/MAR2600159 105-2601-4303 20,021.22 Total : 20,021.2200159 31726453 4/16/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 700338055956 ELECTRICITY/MAR2600159 001-4204-4303 1,330.54 Total : 1,330.5400159 31726618 4/16/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 700371314327 ELECTRICITY/MAR2600159 105-2601-4303 279.63 Total : 279.6300159 31726677 4/16/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 700382668983 ELECTRICITY/MAR2600159 Page 93 of 1002 04/22/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 2:10:54PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 31726677 4/16/2026 (Continued)SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO00159 001-3104-4303 920.93 Total : 920.9300159 31729843 4/16/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 700915693380 ELECTRICITY/MAR2600159 001-4204-4303 2,007.33 Total : 2,007.3300159 Bank total : 342,149.72 58 Vouchers for bank code :boa 342,149.72Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 58 Page 94 of 1002 04/23/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 10:02:37AM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111949 4/23/2026 AM-TEC TOTAL SECURITY INC 646370 LOT C ELEVATOR CAMERA INSTALLATION23279 301-8699-4201 11,960.14 Total : 11,960.1423279 Bank total : 11,960.14 1 Vouchers for bank code :boa 11,960.14Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 1 Attachment 2Page 95 of 1002 04/29/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 2:17:44PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111950 4/29/2026 AQUA FLO SI2734059 MR#990730 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES09366 001-6101-4309 370.75 MR#990731 IRRIGATION SUPPLIESSI27433656 001-6101-4309 78.72 Total : 449.4709366 111951 4/29/2026 AT&T 000025107033 PD COMPUTER CIRCUITS/MAR2600321 001-2101-4304 131.20 Total : 131.2000321 111952 4/29/2026 B.L. WILCOX & ASSOCIATES 26-1341 FIRE HOSE CABINET FOR PARKING STRUCTURE18179 301-8699-4201 715.31 301-8699-4201 40.76 Total : 756.0718179 111953 4/29/2026 BARROWS, PATRICK PO45574 INSTRUCTOR PYMT CLASSES THRU 4.9.2617271 001-4601-4221 945.00 Total : 945.0017271 111954 4/29/2026 BEACHSPORTS PO45579 INSTRUCTOR PYMT CLASSES THRU 4.9.2618036 001-4601-4221 4,610.46 INSTRUCTOR PYMT CLASS 12467PO45580 001-4601-4221 496.36 Total : 5,106.8218036 111955 4/29/2026 BLUMENFELD, DALTON PO45581 COLONIAL LIFE PREMIUM REFUND21651 001-3904 9.06 Total : 9.0621651 111956 4/29/2026 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS PO45575 BLDG STANDARDS ADMIN FEE 1/1/26-3/31/2615663 001-3204 573.00 Total : 573.0015663 111957 4/29/2026 CAPITAL LIGHTING AND ELECTRIC 504663 MR#512082 ELECTRICAL MAINT SUPPLIES21720 105-2601-4309 984.47 Total : 984.4721720 111958 4/29/2026 CENTERS OF CA, A MEDICAL CORP, OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH90623234 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 4.13.2623578 001-1203-4320 436.00 Attachment 3Page 96 of 1002 04/29/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 2:17:44PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 436.00 111958 4/29/2026 CENTERS OF CA, A MEDICAL CORP, OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH23578 111959 4/29/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188398301041426 1301 HERMOSA/540 PIER CONNECTION/APR2620236 001-2101-4304 784.25 Total : 784.2520236 111960 4/29/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 232074101041426 CA DOJ NETWORK CONNECTION/APR2620236 001-2101-4306 494.28 Total : 494.2820236 111961 4/29/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188397001041426 PW YARD CABLE/MAY2620236 001-4204-4201 192.94 Total : 192.9420236 111962 4/29/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188398901041426 PD CABLE/APR2620236 001-2101-4201 110.54 Total : 110.5420236 111963 4/29/2026 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES REPW26040606030 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/MAR2600879 001-3104-4251 458.27 Total : 458.2700879 111964 4/29/2026 CRECY, STEVEN PO45573 VETERANS MEMORIAL FLAGS REPLACEMENT14752 001-2120 262.01 Total : 262.0114752 111965 4/29/2026 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 109-1122217 MR#472056 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PARTS22926 715-3302-4311 138.88 Total : 138.8822926 111966 4/29/2026 GRAINGER 9887745017 MAT REQ 473289/MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES10836 160-3102-4309 267.04 Total : 267.0410836 111967 4/29/2026 HAJOCA CORPORATION S179641747.001 MR#512086 PLUMBING SUPPLIES13330 001-4204-4309 771.91 Total : 771.9113330 111968 4/29/2026 HDL COREN & CONE SIN062581 PROPERTY TAX AUDIT SVS/APR-JUN2603131 001-1201-4201 1,751.98 Page 97 of 1002 04/29/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 2:17:44PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 1,751.98 111968 4/29/2026 HDL COREN & CONE03131 111969 4/29/2026 JOL DESIGN 041526 SURFERS WALK OF FAME TSHIRTS12162 001-4601-4201 350.00 001-2130 358.99 Total : 708.9912162 111970 4/29/2026 KOA CORPORATION 22454-19 CIP689 CONSTRUCTION MGMT/AUG-SEPT2522869 301-8689-4201 21,922.52 CIP689 CONSTRUCTION MGMT/JUL2522754-18 301-8689-4201 11,033.00 Total : 32,955.5222869 111971 4/29/2026 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 320875 PD POLICY REVIEW&NEGOTIATIONS/MAR2602175 001-1203-4201 6,528.00 PERSONNEL LEGAL SVS/FAULK/MAR26320876 001-1203-4201 8,300.28 Total : 14,828.2802175 111972 4/29/2026 MANHATTAN BEACH TOYOTA 713529 MR#472055 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS21517 715-3302-4311 453.57 Total : 453.5721517 111973 4/29/2026 NEW POWER CONTRACTING FOR BLDG PYMT#5 COMMUNITY CTR GAS LINE REPAIRS/FEB2623981 301-8630-4201 73,023.45 Total : 73,023.4523981 111974 4/29/2026 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 463330053001 MAT REQ 519666/OFFICE SUPPLIES13114 001-4201-4305 82.30 MAT REQ 473288/OFFICE SUPPLIES465382288001 001-4202-4305 93.25 MAT REQ 473288/OFFICE SUPPLIES465383704001 001-4202-4305 5.81 Total : 181.3613114 111975 4/29/2026 PARADISE AWARDS 43294 SWOF - 2003 INDUCTEES PLATE08878 001-4601-4308 235.33 Total : 235.3308878 111976 4/29/2026 PH&S PRODUCTS LLC 0018888-IN MEDICAL GRADE GLOVES17130 Page 98 of 1002 04/29/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 2:17:44PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111976 4/29/2026 (Continued)PH&S PRODUCTS LLC17130 001-2101-4306 1,086.00 Total : 1,086.0017130 111977 4/29/2026 PHIL ROBERTS ILLUSTRATION 04.07.2026 SWOF 2026 ARTWORK ILLUSTRATION13777 001-4601-4201 750.00 Total : 750.0013777 111978 4/29/2026 ROBERT HALF 66127246 TEMP STAFFING - HR - ENDING 4.17.2622419 001-1203-4201 3,500.00 TEMP STAFFING - CCO - ENDING 4.17.2666139576 001-1121-4201 3,118.00 TEMP STAFFING - CCO - ENDING 4.24.2666153919 001-1121-4201 3,118.00 TEMP STAFFING - HR - ENDING 4.24.2666262282 001-1203-4201 2,625.00 Total : 12,361.0022419 111979 4/29/2026 SBCU VISA PO45559 A YANG CC STATEMENT - MAR2603353 001-1101-4305 423.94 001-1101-4317 1,000.00 001-1201-4304 154.50 001-1201-4305 709.46 001-1201-4315 400.00 715-1206-5401 414.84 001-1101-4319 -58.49 Total : 3,044.2503353 111980 4/29/2026 SMARTRISE ELEVATOR SERVICE INC 49746 HOISTWAY ACCESS IN LOT C ELEVATOR23561 301-8699-4201 2,730.00 Total : 2,730.0023561 111981 4/29/2026 SWA GROUP INC 205803 SOUTH PARK SLOPE&IRRIGATION SVS/JUL2522203 125-8603-4201 4,597.20 SOUTH PARK SLOPE&IRRIGATION SVS/OCT25207094 125-8603-4201 1,485.00 Total : 6,082.2022203 111982 4/29/2026 TRIANGLE HARDWARE ACCT 1009 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/APR2600123 001-3104-4201 4,883.29 Page 99 of 1002 04/29/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 2:17:44PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111982 4/29/2026 (Continued)TRIANGLE HARDWARE00123 001-3104-4309 967.23 001-4204-4309 1,921.76 001-6101-4309 381.95 105-2601-4309 1,886.27 715-3302-4311 1,290.75 715-4206-4309 543.65 001-2021 201.17 001-2022 -201.17 Total : 11,874.9000123 111983 4/29/2026 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC 045-559325 ERP SOFTWARE CONVERSION 4.1.2605626 715-1206-4201 1,304.00 Total : 1,304.0005626 111984 4/29/2026 WESTGROUP DESIGNS INC 25840-05 COMMUNITY CTR WINDOW REPLACEMENT/MAR2622612 301-8635-4201 7,275.00 Total : 7,275.0022612 111985 4/29/2026 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 00423841 LABOR COMPLIANCE SERVICES/MAR2610703 313-8114-4201 2,558.00 Total : 2,558.0010703 111986 4/29/2026 YARY PHOTOGRAPHY 13553 PHOTOGRAPHY FEE FOR DEPT PHOTO14188 001-2101-4305 700.00 Total : 700.0014188 111987 4/29/2026 YUNEX LLC 5610008095 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/MAR2622715 001-3104-4201 2,021.05 Total : 2,021.0522715 Bank total : 188,796.09 38 Vouchers for bank code :boa 188,796.09Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 38 Page 100 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PR-024 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council AMENDMENTS TO THE HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB AND HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB AGREEMENTS (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Approve the seventh amendment to an agreement with the Hermosa Beach Rotary Club; 2. Approve the first amendment to an agreement with the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest the proposed amendments, subject to approval by the City Attorney. Executive Summary: Staff reviewed the current Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club (Kiwanis) and Hermosa Beach Rotary Club (Rotary) agreements and determined a need to update the terms pertaining to the insurance requirements of each agreement. Background: The City first entered into agreements with the Hermosa Beach Rotary Club in 1949 and the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club in 1956 for the use of land located within Valley Park. These long-standing partnerships provide for the Clubs’ use and occupancy of City- owned property on which the Rotary Club and Kiwanis Club buildings are situated. Under the terms of these agreements, both organizations are resp onsible for the operation, maintenance, and stewardship of their respective facilities. In return, the Clubs utilize the buildings to support a wide range of community-serving activities, with a particular emphasis on programs and initiatives that benefit local youth and families. City staff conducted a comprehensive review of the existing agreements with the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club and the Hermosa Beach Rotary Club. The current agreement with the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club was executed in 2006 (Attachment 1), while the agreement with the Hermosa Beach Rotary Club (Attachment 2) was executed in 2009. Page 101 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 3 As part of this review, staff evaluated the agreements for consistency with current City standards, risk management practices, and insurance requirements. Staff identified that the insurance provisions in both agreements are outdated and do not fully align with the City’s current policies and industry standards. Staff determined that updates to the insurance requirement sections are necessary to ensure modernization, improve clarity, and maintain uniformity across City agreements. These updates are intended to better protect the City while continuing to support longstanding partnerships with both organizations. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description October 24, 2006 City Council approved a lease agreement with Kiwanis for use of the premises at 2515 Valley Drive for a term of 25 years. September 8, 2009 City Council approved a lease agreement with Rotary for a term expiring July 28, 2012. February 14, 2013 City Council approved the first amendment to the lease agreement with Rotary to extend the agreement for an additional three-year term. July 28, 2015 City Council approved the second amendment to the lease agreement with Rotary to extend the agreement for an additional three-year term. February 26, 2019 City Council approved a third amendment to the lease agreement with Rotary to retroactively extend the agreement for an additional one-year term. June 11, 2019 City Council approved a fourth amendment to the lease agreement with Rotary to extend the agreement for an additional four-month term. February 25, 2020 City Council approved a sixth amendment to the lease agreement with Rotary to extend the agreement for a month-to- month-term. Discussion: The insurance requirements in both leases no longer reflect current municipal standards or best practices. Updates are necessary to ensure appropriate coverage levels, standardized language, and alignment with the City’s current risk management framework. To address these issues, staff prepared amendments to both agreements that modernize and standardize the insurance provisions. The proposed revisions are limited in scope and are intended solely to update risk-related terms, while maintaining all existing operational responsibilities and the long-standing use of the facilities by both organizations. Page 102 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 3 The current insurance language is simpler and focuses more on property coverage, with less detail on liability and risk protection. The proposed updates set clearer coverage requirements, improve documentation, and better protect the City by requiring things like primary coverage, waiver of subrogation, and broader additional insured provisions. Overall, the revised language provides stronger and more complete protection for the City. Included as Attachments 3 and 4 are the proposed amendments to the Kiwanis and Rotary Clubs Lease Agreements. Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended actions. Attachments: 1. Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Foundation Lease Agreement 2. Hermosa Beach Rotary Club Lease Agreement 3. Proposed Amendment to the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club Lease Agreement 4. Proposed Amendment to the Hermosa Beach Rotary Club Lease Agreement Respectfully Submitted by: Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 103 of 1002 Page 104 of 1002 Page 105 of 1002 Page 106 of 1002 Page 107 of 1002 Page 108 of 1002 Page 109 of 1002 Page 110 of 1002 Page 111 of 1002 Page 112 of 1002 Page 113 of 1002 Page 114 of 1002 Page 115 of 1002 Page 116 of 1002 Page 117 of 1002 Page 118 of 1002 Page 119 of 1002 Page 120 of 1002 Page 121 of 1002 Page 122 of 1002 Page 123 of 1002 Page 124 of 1002 Page 125 of 1002 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND KIWANIS CLUB OF HERMOSA BEACH This First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement is made and entered into as of May 12, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Hermosa Beach (a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254) (“City”) and Kiwanis Club of Hermosa Beach (a California nonprofit corporation with its principal place of business at 2515 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254) (“Lessee”). City and Lessee are hereinafter sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. RECITALS A.The Parties entered an agreement dated October 24, 2006 (“Agreement”), for the lease of City owned property; and B.The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement to modernize insurance requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties mutually agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1.Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals listed above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2.Amendment. Section 5 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: “Insurance. i.For the duration of the Agreement, so long as Lessee is in use of the SITE, Lessee shall procure and maintain insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the use of the SITE hereunder and the use by its agents, representatives, employees, volunteers and guests. Page 126 of 1002 BBK (2026) Page 2 of 6 FIRST AMENDMENT 65270.00021\44443112.1 ii.For insurance purposes, the SITE shall be defined to include all areas occupied or affected by Lessee’s regular operations, as depicted in Exhibit A. iii.MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: a.Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. The policy shall be endorsed to include athletic activities and athletic participant injury coverage. b.Should Lessee maintain broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by Lessee. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. c.Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. If Lessee does not use any vehicles in connection with the services provided, Lessee shall not be required to maintain such coverage. d.Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and furnish City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be canceled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. If Lessee has no Page 127 of 1002 BBK (2026) Page 3 of 6 FIRST AMENDMENT 65270.00021\44443112.1 employees and is exempt under applicable laws, Lessee shall not be required to maintain such coverage. iv. SELF-INSURED RETENTIONS. a. Self-insured approved by the City’s Risk Manager. The City may require Lessee to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or the City. v. OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS. The general liability policy is to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions. a. The City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and contracted volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of the use and operations performed at the SITE by or on behalf of Lessee in connection with such use and operations, to the extent of Lessee’s indemnity obligations herein. b. For any claims related to this Agreement, Lessee’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non- contributory insurance coverage as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and contracted volunteers. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. c. Lessee’s Insurance Company agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents, and employees for losses paid under the terms of any policy which arise from use or operation of the City’s SITE. This provision also applies Lessee’s Workers’ Compensation policy. d. Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled or altered, except with thirty (30) day written notice to the City. vi. UMBRELLA OR EXCESS POLICY. Page 128 of 1002 BBK (2026) Page 4 of 6 FIRST AMENDMENT 65270.00021\44443112.1 a.Lessee may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non-contributory, additional insured, Self-Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true “following form” or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the primary excess liability policies are exhausted. vii.ACCEPTABILITY OF INSURERS. a.Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. viii.VERIFICATION OF COVERAGE. a.The City shall request from Lessee and Lessee shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications, at any time.” 3.Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this First Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect; and shall govern the actions of the Parties under this First Amendment. Whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the original Agreement from and after the date of this First Amendment, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this First Amendment. Page 129 of 1002 BBK (2026) Page 5 of 6 FIRST AMENDMENT 65270.00021\44443112.1 4.Electronic Transmission. A manually signed copy of this First Amendment which is transmitted by facsimile, electronic mail, or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this First Amendment for all purposes. This First Amendment may be signed using an electronic signature. 5.Counterparts. This First Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this First Amendment on the Effective Date. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVED BY: Steve Napolitano City Manager Attested By: Martha Alvarez City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jason Baltimore Interim City Attorney KIWANIS CLUB OF HERMOSA BEACH Rick Koenig Lieutenant Governor Page 130 of 1002 BBK (2026) Page 6 of 6 FIRST AMENDMENT 65270.00021\44443112.1 EXHIBIT A Page 131 of 1002 SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB This Seventh Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement is made and entered into as of May 12, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Hermosa Beach (a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254) (“City”) and Hermosa Beach Rotary Club (a California nonprofit corporation with its principal place of business at 2515 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254) (“Lessee”). City and Lessee are hereinafter sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. RECITALS A. The Parties entered an agreement dated July 29, 2009 (“Agreement”), for the lease of City owned property; and B. The Parties amended the Agreement six times to extend the term (on February 1, 2013; July 28, 2015; April 24, 2018; June 11, 2019; October 22, 2019; and February 25, 2020); and C. The Parties now desire to amend the Agreement a seventh time to modernize insurance requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties mutually agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals listed above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Amendment. Section 5 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: Page 132 of 1002 BBK (2026) Page 2 of 6 SEVENTH AMENDMENT “Insurance. i. For the duration of the Agreement, so long as Lessee is in use of the SITE, Lessee shall procure and maintain insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the use of the SITE hereunder and the use by its agents, representatives, employees, volunteers and guests. ii. For insurance purposes, the SITE shall be defined to include all areas occupied or affected by Lessee’s regular operations, as depicted in Exhibit A. iii. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: a. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. The policy shall be endorsed to include athletic activities and athletic participant injury coverage. b. Should Lessee maintain broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by Lessee. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. c. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. If Lessee does not use any vehicles in connection with the services provided, Lessee shall not be required to maintain such coverage. Page 133 of 1002 BBK (2026) Page 3 of 6 SEVENTH AMENDMENT d. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and furnish City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be canceled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. If Lessee has no employees and is exempt under applicable laws, Lessee shall not be required to maintain such coverage. iv. SELF-INSURED RETENTIONS. a. Self-insured approved by the City’s Risk Manager. The City may require Lessee to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or the City. v. OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS. The general liability policy is to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions. a. The City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and contracted volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of the use and operations performed at the SITE by or on behalf of Lessee in connection with such use and operations, to the extent of Lessee’s indemnity obligations herein. b. For any claims related to this Agreement, Lessee’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non- contributory insurance coverage as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and contracted volunteers. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. c. Lessee’s Insurance Company agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents, and employees for losses paid under the terms of any policy which arise from use or Page 134 of 1002 BBK (2026) Page 4 of 6 SEVENTH AMENDMENT operation of the City’s SITE. This provision also applies Lessee’s Workers’ Compensation policy. d. Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled or altered, except with thirty (30) day written notice to the City. vi. UMBRELLA OR EXCESS POLICY. a. Lessee may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non-contributory, additional insured, Self-Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true “following form” or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the primary excess liability policies are exhausted. vii. ACCEPTABILITY OF INSURERS. a. Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. viii. VERIFICATION OF COVERAGE. a. The City shall request from Lessee and Lessee shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications, at any time.” Page 135 of 1002 BBK (2026) Page 5 of 6 SEVENTH AMENDMENT 3.Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Seventh Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect; and shall govern the actions of the Parties. Whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the original Agreement from and after the date of this Seventh Amendment, it shall mean the Agreement as amended. 4.Electronic Transmission. A manually signed copy of this Seventh Amendment which is transmitted by facsimile, electronic mail, or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this Seventh Amendment for all purposes. This Seventh Amendment may be signed using an electronic signature. 5.Counterparts. This Seventh Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Seventh Amendment on the Effective Date. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVED BY: Steve Napolitano City Manager Attested By: Martha Alvarez City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jason Baltimore Interim City Attorney HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB Angie Silverman President Page 136 of 1002 BBK (2026) Page 6 of 6 SEVENTH AMENDMENT EXHIBIT A Page 137 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 4 Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-AS-052 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council REQUEST TO APPROVE JOB SPECIFICATION REVISIONS, JOB SPECIFICATION ADDITIONS, BARGAINING GROUPS AND SALARY RANGES (Human Resources Manager Tyler Cashman) Recommended Action : Staff recommends City Council: 1. Approve the revisions for the following job specifications: Senior Account Clerk (Attachment 1), Human Resources Manager (Attachment 2), Human Resources Analyst (Attachment 3), Community Resources Director (Attachment 4), Senior Recreation Supervisor (Attachment 5), and Recreation Specialist (Attachment 6); 2. Approve the establishment of the following new job specifications: Account Specialist (Attachment 7), Lead Account Specialist (Attachment 8), Senior Accountant (Attachment 9), Revenue Services Manager (Attachment 10), Human Resources Technician (Attachment 11), Senior Human Resources Analyst (Attachment 12), Recreation Supervisor (Attachment 13), Parks and Recreation Manager (Attachment 14), and Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst (Attachment 15); 3. Approve the establishment of the five -step salary ranges (Attachment 16) for Account Specialist, Lead Account Specialist, Senior Accountant, Revenue Services Manager, Human Resources Technician, Senior Human Resources Analyst, Recreation Supervisor, Parks and Recreation Manager, and Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst; 4. Approve the establishment of Account Specialist and Lead Account Specialist in the General and Supervisory Employees’ Bargaining Unit Teamsters Local 986; and 5. Approve the establishment of Senior Accountant, Revenue Services Manager, Recreation Supervisor, Parks and Recreation Manager, and Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst in the Professional and Administrative Employees’ Group. 6. Approve the establishment of Human Resources Technician and Senior Human Resources Analyst in the Unrepresented Employee Group. Executive Summary: The proposed action requests City Council approval of revisions to existing job specifications and the establishment of new job classifications to create structured career Page 138 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 4 series across selected functional areas. These updates are int ended to modernize outdated classifications, better align job requirements with current operational needs and industry standards, and support the City’s long -term workforce development goals. A key component of this effort is the creation of career serie s, which provides clear, progressive pathways for employee advancement within specific job families. These series are designed to enhance employee retention, improve succession planning, and promote the development of institutional knowledge by enabling internal growth opportunities. The proposed new job specifications will not result in automatic staffing or compensation changes and will only be implemented if and when departments choose to incorporate them into future budget cycles, subject to City Council approval. Overall, the proposed updates position the City to build a more adaptable, skilled, and sustainable workforce while maintaining fiscal responsibility. Background: The City maintains a classification and compensation system intended to support effective service delivery, organizational efficiency, and employee development. Over time, several job specifications have become outdated due to evolving service demands, technological advancements, and changing professional standards. Additionally, the current classification structure in certain departments lack defined career ladders, limiting opportunities for internal advancement and professional growth. This has contributed to challenges in employee retention, succession planning, and workforce development. To address these issues, the Human Resources Division conducted a comprehensive review of selected job classifications and organizational structures, in collaborati on with management staff. Past Board Actions Meeting Date Description Civil Service Board: April 13, 2026 The Civil Service Board approved the proposed job specification revisions and additions on April 13, 2026. Page 139 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 4 Discussion: The proposed updates focus on two primary objectives: 1. Modernizing existing job specifications Revisions to current classifications include: Clarifying essential duties and responsibilities. Aligning job specifications with comparable agencies and labo r market practices. Improving flexibility to meet operational needs. These updates ensure that job descriptions accurately reflect the work being performed and provide clearer expectations for employees and supervisors. 2. Establishing career series The proposed job specification additions contribute to structured career series in key functional areas. A career series typically includes multiple levels within a job family (e.g., I, II, Senior, Lead, etc.), allowing employees to progress based on exper ience, performance, and demonstrated competencies. Benefits of career series include: Providing clear pathways for employee advancement. Supporting employee retention and engagement. Reducing recruitment and onboarding costs through internal promotions. Strengthening succession planning efforts. Encouraging skill development and institutional knowledge retention. Each series is designed with progressively advanced responsibilities, qualifications, and competencies to reflect increasing levels of expertise and accountability. To finalize the establishment of the proposed job specifications, staff requests City Council approval of the proposed job specifications, salary ranges, and bargaining groups. Fiscal Impact: There is no immediate fiscal imp act associated with the approval of the proposed revisions and new job specifications. The new job specifications will not result in automatic staffing or compensation changes. Departments may choose to incorporate these classifications into future budget cycle proposals based on operational needs and available resources. Any fiscal impacts associated with adding or upgrading positions will be evaluated and approved through the C ity’s standard annual budget process. Page 140 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 4 Attachments: 1. Senior Account Clerk 2026– Redlined 2. Human Resources Manager 2026 – Redlined 3. Human Resources Analyst 2026 – Redlined 4. Community Resources Director 2026 – Redlined 5. Senior Recreation Supervisor 2026 – Redlined 6. Recreation Specialist 2026 – Redlined 7. Account Specialist 2026 – Proposed Specification 8. Lead Account Specialist 2026 – Proposed Specification 9. Senior Accountant 2026 – Proposed Specification 10. Revenue Services Manager 2026 – Proposed Specification 11. Human Resources Technician 2026 – Proposed Specification 12. Senior Human Resources Analyst 2026 – Proposed Specification 13. Recreation Supervisor 2026 – Proposed Specification 14. Parks and Recreation Manager 2026 – Proposed Specification 15. Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst 2026 – Proposed Specification 16. Proposed Salary Schedule FY25 -26 Respectfully Sub mitted by: Tyler Cashman, Human Resources Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 141 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification SENIOR ACCOUNT CLERK DEFINITION Under general supervision, to perform a wide variety of complex technical and clerical accounting work involved in performing financial, statistical, and record keeping duties in support of assigned accounting system, function, or program area including in the areas of accounts receivable, of accounts payable, and payroll; to operate specific data processing or office equipment; to provide information and assistance to the general public and City departments; to maintain files and records; to participate in the preparation of various reports; to act as Deputy City Treasurer as assigned; to perform a variety of technical tasks relative to assigned area of responsibility; and may supervise other office personnel. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Performs a variety of responsible technical accounting and financial office support duties in support of assigned accounting system, function, or program area including in the areas of accounts receivable, accounts payable, and payroll; prepares, maintains, and/or verifies a variety of accounting, financial, and statistical records, ledgers, logs, and files; gathers, assembles, tabulates, enters, checks, verifies, balances, adjusts, records, and files financial data; codes data according to prescribed accounting procedures; reviews information to ensure accurate reporting; establishes and maintains various files and records; performs data entry including posting information to various city accounts and funds; assists in the preparation of financial, accounting, and statistical statements, analyses, documents, and reports; takes custody of cash and valuable documents and access thereto, while acting as Deputy City Treasurer; assists the City Treasurer in the administration of the City’s investment program including compiling data for monthly, detailed report of investment activity, projecting daily and long term cash flow, reviewing and monitoring central cashiering, banking, accounting and record keeping operations, and reviewing transactions for proper revenue account classifications; performs duties in support of the City’s accounts receivable function including generating invoices, reviewing for accuracy and proper authorizations and account codes, entering customer information into billing system and assembling related documents; performs duties in support of the City’s accounts payable function including receiving incoming invoices for payment and reviewing for accuracy and proper authorizations and account coding, researching discrepancies, and ensuring that payments are included and processed in a timely manner; review invoices for use tax accrual and correct 1099 reporting; prepare 1099s and use tax return; ensure invoices and purchase orders follow purchasing policies; assist other departments with vendor and contract questions; perform a variety of payroll functions including inputting employee time sheets and verifying hours and time off, updating employee leave balances and related payroll records including use of vacation, sick leave, and related benefits, processing payroll checks through financial accounting system, and distributing checks; prepare various tax filing accounts and end of the year W-2’s; performs special projects and studies; collects and compiles statistical and financial data for special reports, as directed. . Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt, Not Bold Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt, Not Bold Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Page 142 of 1002 QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES Knowledge, Skills & Abilities: Knowledge of: basic principles, procedures, and methods used in the performance of clerical and technical accounting duties; basic principles and procedures of financial record keeping and reporting; methods and techniques of coding, verifying, balancing, and reconciling accounting records; basic mathematical principles; customer service techniques, practices, and principles; principles and procedures of record keeping and filing; methods and techniques for basic report preparation and writing; office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers and applicable software applications such as word processing, spreadsheets, and databases;; statistical typing techniques. Ability to: perform a variety of technical accounting and office support duties and activities in support of assigned function ; perform a variety of accounting, fiscal, and statistical record keeping duties including to prepare, maintain, and reconcile a variety of records and files; post and calculate mathematical computations rapidly and accurately and operate a ten-key calculator with capability to learn other equipment as needed; compile a variety of information and records and exercise good judgment in maintaining information, records, and reports ; operate and use modern office equipment including a computer and various software packages; perform tasks in accordance with established policies, regulations an ordinances; establish and maintain effective relationships with the public and fellow employees. Education and Experience: Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A t ypical way to obtain this required knowledge would be: Educational achievement equivalent to graduation from high school and three years of technical and clerical accounting experience. Licenses/Certificates: Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License with a safe driving record is required and must be maintained as valid during the course of employment. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with extensive public contact and constant interruptions. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office setting; to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; to occasionally stoop, bend, kneel, crouch, reach, and twist; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Formatted: Font: Century Gothic Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic Page 143 of 1002 Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. Approved by the Civil Service Board: Approved by the City Council: Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Page 144 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER DEFINITION Under administrative direction, to plan, direct, manage, organize, evaluate and coordinate a comprehensive Human Resources and Risk Management program, to include employee relations, labor relations, recruitment and selection, classification, compensation, training and employee development, benefits and leaves administration and personnel research; supervises professional, technical and support staff;; to direct the settlement of worker’s compensation claims; recommend coverage and purchase of insurance and develop and direct the conduct of safety and training programs; and to do related work as required. CLASS CHARACTERISTICS Assist in the development and implementation of goals, objectives, policies and procedures for their respective department(s); Ensures that the department’s goals and objectives are within the model of a “High Performance Organization” using collaborative and participative concepts. As the Human Resources & Risk Management Manager for the City of Hermosa Beach, you will be expected to be part of our high- performing team that work together toward the achievement of common goals – short term and long term. You will be required to exhibit a commitment to performance excellence, exercise mutual respect, and hold yourself and your department employees accountable at both the individual and team levels. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Plans, organizes, directs, manages, coordinates, supervises and performs professional personnel work involved in the administration and maintenance of City recruitment, selection, employee orientation, classification and compensationsalary, labor relations, performance evaluation, counseling and grievance and affirmative action programs; develops, administers and interprets personnel and salary policies, regulations and procedures; coordinates with departmental and administrative officials in the development or improvement of personnel procedures, standards, regulations and forms; advises departments on organization, design and staffing; serves as a liaison and coordinates contracted testing and selection processes; provides staff support to the Civil Service Commission; coordinates the preparation of departmental agenda items and attends meetings of the Civil Service Commission and City Council; periodically reviews and updates City job classifications; directs and conducts personnel management, salary and benefit surveys and prepares recommendations and reports; provides information and technical assistance on personnel policies and procedures, the affirmative action program, supplementary employee benefits and other personnel matters; reviews and makes recommendations on improvements to personnel practices and procedures; Formatted: Font: Not Bold Page 145 of 1002 serves on the management team in the City negotiating process; directs and conducts studies and surveys and develops salary, benefit and cost data for management proposals; implements and monitors MOU’s; counsels and advises on a range of labor- management issues; reviews and analyzes pertinent legislation affecting personnel management; manages and leads activities in support of employee interactive processes, light duty, and return to work; supervises the work of department personnel. Plans, organizes, directs, coordinates, supervises and performs professional work involved in the administration and maintenance of the City’s Risk Management Program; manages the purchase of Property, Vehicle, Casualty, Liability, and Workers Compensation insurance; recommends coverage, deductible amounts, and reserve levels; manages the City’s claims defense and settlement process; coordinates the City’s recovery actions in cases of negligence by a third party; coordinates and monitors the work of claims adjusters and attorneys representing the City; performs research and analysis and prepares reports, charts, tables, an other forms of analysis in order to provide the department and the City with necessary risk management information; presents reports and information to the City Council; develops procedures and recommends methods for funding, contracts, facilities, and activities under consideration by the City, and advises on risk implications; confers with managers to determine loss prevention and safety; works with departmental safety committees on loss control activities; develops, improves and contracts for the presentation of safety and training programs; serves as City representative on Risk Management groups and associations. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES Knowledge, Skills & Abilities: Knowledge of modern principles, practices and procedures of personnel administration, including labor relations, affirmative action, classification and compensation, recruitment, selection, performance evaluation and training; Federal and State laws, regulations and administrative rules as they relate to personnel management, risk management, workers compensation, safety, and loss control; risk management techniques and principles; fiscal planning and budget allocation techniques; claims processing, adjusting an d reporting techniques; office management and record keeping principles, methods and procedures; statistical, research and survey methods and techniques; principles and practices of supervision, training and budget administration; labor relations laws, practices and procedures; computers and computer applications; report writing methods and techniques. Ability to plan, organize, direct, coordinate and perform professional level work involved in a comprehensive Human Resources and Risk Management program; conduct and improve recruitment, selection, evaluation, training, classification audit and personnel record keeping activities; initiate research studies and reports including the collection, organization, analysis and development of administrative and management recommendations; advise City officials and employees on human resources and risk management related programs and services; prepare and present comprehensive written and oral reports; develop and improve training and safety programs; assist with identifying and resolving various labor relations and risk management related problems in the City’s work force; establish and maintain cooperative work relationships with those contacted in the course of work; supervise and train subordinate personnel. Page 146 of 1002 Education and Experience: Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge would be: Graduation from an accredited four year college or university with a degree in Public Administration, Business Administration, Industrial Relations, Finance, or a closely related field. Five years of increasingly responsible generalist human resources experience in a government setting (including at least two years of supervision experience). A professional certification by SHRM or IPMA-HR (PSHRA) is highly desired but not required. Licenses/Certificates: Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License with a safe driving record is required and must be maintained as valid during the course of employment. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with extensive public contact and constant interruptions. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office setting; to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; to occasionally stoop, bend, kneel, crouch, reach, and twist; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; to travel to other locations using various modes of private and commercial transportation; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. Formatted: Font: Not Bold Formatted: Font: Italic Page 147 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST DEFINITION Under general direction, to perform a variety of professional level administrative, technical, and analytical duties in support of the City’s Human Resources and Risk Management Division including in the areas of recruitment and selection, employee benefit plans, workers' compensation and general liability claims, and salary and performance evaluation programs; to prepare, process, and maintain employee records and data; and to assist City staff and the general public and provide information related to specific program area of assignment. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Performs a variety of professional level administrative, technical, and analytical duties in support of the City’s Human Resources and Risk Management Division including in the areas of recruitment and selection, employee benefit plans, workers' compensation and general liability claims, and salary and performance evaluation programs; plans, coordinates and performs admini strative assignments and special projects; works as a team member in a dynamic environment; recommends and implements improvements to policies and procedures; ensures accuracy, completeness and compliance with City standards, policies, and procedures; delivers outstanding internal and external customer service participates in the recruitment and selection process including responding to inquiries regarding the recruitment and selection process; drafts and places job announcement advertisements; collects applications and assists with job application screening; assists in the administration/proctoring of employment examinations; makes arrangements for testing facilities; organizes, corrects and scores exams; organizes oral interview boards and orients oral board raters; prepares and maintains eligibility lists according to established procedures; notifies candidates of results; provides new employee orientation; explains City employment policies and procedures; attends Civil Service Board meetings; processes personnel action forms; distributes employee performance review schedule; maintains personnel records; completes employment verifications; reconciles bank statements for the liability and workers’ compensation trust accounts; processes required documents for workers’ compensation and general liability claims and coordinates claims activities with third party administrators; arranges pre-employment and annual physical examinations; verifies accuracy of invoices received for physical examinations; explains empl oyment benefits and assists in coordinating enrollment and changes in insurance plans for employees and retirees; assists in the coordination of open enrollment; conducts surveys of salary and benefits; compiles and prepares summaries of data; composes and types correspondence from oral and written instructions, and initiates/drafts routine Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt, Not Bold Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Page 148 of 1002 2 correspondence; complies data, proofreads, and copies information pertaining to employer- employee relations including negotiations; assists in monitoring and preparation of department budget; responds to inquiries over the telephone , in person, and/or by email ; participates in committees related to planning and organizing employee events including but not limited to all City employee meetings, annual awards dinner, and related events; prepares, submits, performs analytic research and maintains a variety of reports; assists other clerical personnel assigned to the administrative offices; receives, sorts incoming and outgoing U.S. mail; answers the general information line f or the City; performs related work as required. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: Knowledge of: Operations, services, and activities of a human resources program; principles and practices of human resources administration including recruitment and selection, employee benefit plans, workers' compensation and general liability claims, and salary and performance evaluation programs; personnel policies and procedures of a municipal personnel department; principles of research, record keeping and report preparation; methods and techniques for record keeping and filing public relations techniques and procedures; conducts duties, responsibilities, tasks, and assignments with a constructive, cooperative, positive and professional attitude and demeanor; understands the importance of integrity and confidentiality and holds it to a high standard; communicates effectively orally and in writing with the public and fellow employees ; methods and techniques of proper phone etiquette ; exercises tact, self-restraint, and good judgement, takes initiative to achieve positive, timely results with diplomatic skills and ethical conduct; ability to use basic office equipment including computers and office applications such as word processing, spreadsheets, and statistical databases;; Ability to: perform a variety of professional level administrative, technical, and analytical duties and activities of a general and specialized nature in support of the Human Resources Division ; make independent decisions; organize and prioritize work, coordinating several activities and meeting critical deadlines; research, collect, compile, and analyze a variety of data; type or enter data at a speed necessary for successful job performance ; interpret and understand policies and procedures; perform clerical tasks requiring a high degree of accuracy; maintain confidential records and files; review work for accuracy and completeness; work independently in the absence of supervision; c ompose correspondence and compile and arrange data in a readable and comprehensible manner ; understand the organization and operation of the City and of outside agencies as necessary to assume assigned responsibilities; deal successfully with the public, in person and over the telephone ; operate office equipment including computers and supporting word processing, spreadsheet, and database applications; communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing ; Formatted: Font: Century Gothic Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Page 149 of 1002 3 establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Education and Experience: Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge would be: This position requires a college degree from an accredited college or university with a degree in Human Resources, Business Administration, Public Administration, or a related field and two years of increasingly responsible professional human resources administration experience, preferably in a municipal human resources department. Experience with NeoGov or similar online application tracking system is preferred. Licenses/Certificates: A valid Class C California Driver's License with a safe driving record is required and must be maintained as valid during course of employment. In accordance with California Government Code Section 3100, City of Hermosa Beach employees, in the event of a disaster, are considered disaster service workers and may be asked to protect the health, safety, lives, and p roperty of the people of the State. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with extensive public contact and constant interruptions. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office setting; to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; to occasionally stoop, bend, kneel, crouch, reach, and twist; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to opera te office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; to travel to other locations using various modes of private and commercial transportation; and to verbally com municate to exchange information. unicate to exchange information. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. Page 150 of 1002 4 Approved by the Civil Service Board: March 3, 2021 Approved by the City Council: March 9, 2021 Page 151 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification COMMUNITY RESOURCESPARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR DEFINITION Under the administrative direction of the City Manager, to plan, organize, direct, coordinate and evaluate City cultural, educational, recreational, community and social service programs; to maintain and develop City recreational and community service facilities; and to do related work as required., provides strategic leadership and direction for all programs, services, facilities, and operations of the Parks and Recreation Department, including planning, development, and evaluation of community recreation and cultural services. CLASS CHARACTERISTICS Assist in the development and implementation of goals, objectives, policies and procedures for their respective department(s); Ensures that the department’s goals and objectives are within the model of a “High Performance Organization” using collaborative and participative concepts. As the Parks & Recreation DirectorCommunity Resources Manager for the City of Hermosa Beach, you will be expected to be part of our high-performing team that work together toward the achievement of common goals – short term and long term. You will be required to exhibit a commitment to performance excellence, exercise mutual respect, and hold yourself and your department employees accountable at both the individual and team levels. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Duties may include, but are not limited to the following: Oversees and provides long-range planning and vision for the City’s cultural, educational, recreational, community, and social service programs.Plans, organizes, directs, coordinates and evaluates the cultural, educational, recreational, community and social service programs of the City; Oversees the development, implementation, and enforcement of policies, procedures, and regulations governing department operations, programs, and facility use. Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Justified Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Justified Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Justified Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Justified Page 152 of 1002 2 Provides high-level review and direction on cost analyses of programs and facility operations. Provides direction and approves final recommendations for fees for programs or facility use. Leads development and implementation of department strategic plans and master plans. Advises the City Manager and City Council on policy, operational, and strategic matters related to parks and recreation. Coordinates department activities with other City departments, outside agencies, and community organizations.coordinates department functions and programs with the activities of the other City departments; Selects, trains, supervises, evaluates, and disciplines staff and has responsibility for the discipline of personnel directly or through department supervisors.; Develops and implements policies and regulations for the use of the Community Center and other department and City facilities; Serves as staff liaison to an advisory commission and community groups.Serves in a liaison capacity with a wide variety of community groups and organizations; Oversees the operation of a professional theater complex; Serves as staff liaison with an advisory commission; Prepares cost analyses of program and facility operations; Prepares Oversees the preparation and administers administration of grants.; Oversees special event permits and the special event calendar; Oversees film permits; Ensures proper liability coverage for program operations.; Develops and submits recommendations for fees for recreation programs; Develops advertising and marketing materials for department programs and facilities; Formulates rules, policies and procedures for the operation of the Department; Monitors, writes and negotiates contractsProvides executive oversight of contracts and leases.; Oversees and coordinates facility management and development of all City recreation buildings and facilities which include the Community Center Complex, Civic Theater, the beach and Clark Field Complex; Prepares recommendations for necessary repair, capital improvement, and capital outlay recreation facilities.; Formatted: Justified, No bullets or numbering Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Justified Formatted: Justified, No bullets or numbering Formatted: Justified Formatted: Justified, No bullets or numbering Formatted: Justified Formatted: Justified, No bullets or numbering Formatted: Justified Formatted: Justified, No bullets or numbering Formatted: Justified Formatted: Justified, No bullets or numbering Page 153 of 1002 3 Oversees the processing of special event permits; Provides advice and consultation to the City Manager and City Council on department programs and facility use problems and policies; Makes recommendations for the purchase of equipment and supplies.; Prepares, justifies, and administers the Department budget, ensuring fiscal accountability effective resource allocation.Develops budget requests and controls expenditures; Meets with community groups and organizations regarding department programs, problems and policies; Cultivates sound community relations.; Serves as liaison with other government agencies. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: Knowledge of: Principles, objectives, and practices of modern municipal parks and recreation programs, including cultural, educational, social, and community services; practices, and procedures of public administration, including budgeting, financial management, personnel management, and supervision; laws, regulations, and ordinances affecting municipal parks and recreation operations; long-range planning, strategic planning, and master plan development for public facilities and programs; principles and practices of program evaluation, cost analysis, and resource allocation; development, management, and administration of multi-purpose facilities and recreational programs; principles of professional theater, cultural programming, and arts administration; grant preparation, contract administration, and risk management as they relate to municipal operations; community engagement strategies and public relations best practices; and coordination of interdepartmental and interagency activities.philosophy, objectives and principles of modern municipal recreation, social, cultural, community service and park programs; principles, practices and procedures of public administration, management and supervision, including the development and administration of the department budget; laws, regulations and ordinances affecting departmental operations; development and use of community multi-purpose facilities; general principles of professional theater operation; functions and operations of a non-profit organization; effective program development methods and practices; contract and lease negotiations practices; computers and computer applications; report writing methods and techniques; community organization, resources and facilities; land and facility management; principles of employee training and supervision; public relations principles and practices. Formatted: Justified Formatted: Justified, No bullets or numbering Formatted: Justified Formatted: Justified, No bullets or numbering Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt, Bold Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic Page 154 of 1002 4 Ability to: Plan, organize, direct, and coordinate comprehensive parks and recreation programs and services; develop and implement policies, procedures, and regulations governing department operations; analyze complex administrative, operational, and financial issues and make sound recommendations. prepare and administer budgets, monitor expenditures, and ensure fiscal accountability; lead strategic planning initiatives and oversee the implementation of department and facility master plans; select, train, supervise, evaluate, and discipline professional and support staff effectively; serve as an effective liaison with advisory commissions, community groups, other governmental agencies, and the public; prepare and administer grants, contracts, leases, and capital improvement recommendations; promote community relations, advocate for programs, and respond effectively to public concerns; and ensure compliance with legal, safety, and liability requirements in departmental operations.plan, organize, direct, coordinate and evaluate departmental operations; evaluate and make recommendations on improvements to existing operations and programs; prepare and administer the department budget; direct, train and evaluate subordinate personnel; evaluate facility development needs and programs; direct the operations of a professional theater; prepare and present comprehensive written and oral reports; establish and maintain cooperative relationships with City personnel, consultants, commission and board members, representatives of outside agencies and members of the general public; conduct an effective public relations program. Education and Experience: Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge would be: Graduation from an accredited four-year college or university with a degree in Recreation Administration, Public or Business Administration, Theater Arts Management or a closely related field. Five years of increasingly responsible professional recreational, community service and park management experience, including at least four years in a supervisory or administrative capacity. Licenses/Certificates: Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License with a safe driving record is required or the ability to get from point to point for meetings and trainings. In accordance with California Government Code Section 3100, City of Hermosa Beach employees, in the event of a disaster, are considered disaster service workers and may be asked to protect the health, safety, lives, and property of the people of the State. Formatted: Font: 11 pt Page 155 of 1002 5 PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with extensive public contact and constant interruptions. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office setting; to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; to occasionally stoop, bend, kneel, crouch, reach, and twist; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; to travel to other locations using various modes of private and commercial transportation; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. Approved by the Civil Service Board: Approved by the City Council: Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Justified Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Physical Demands3, No widow/orphan control Page 156 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification SENIOR RECREATION SUPERVISOR DEFINITION Under the direct supervision of the Community Resources Managegeneral supervisionr, the Senior Recreation Supervisor plans, coordinates, and oversees assigned recreation programs, services and facilities; supervises full-time and part-time staff; and performs advanced administrative and operational duties in support of departmental goals and initiatives. shall work cooperatively with the Recreation Coordinators and part-time staff to provide a variety of recreational services to the public. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Duties may include, but are not limited toany combination of the following: Provides effective customer service to the public; responds to public inquiries in person, over the phone and/or by e-mail. Supervises, and trains the Recreation Coordinators; works with the Recreation Coordinators to correct deficienciesRecruits, selects, trains, schedules and supervises part-time and full-time staff and volunteers, including providing leadership, setting performance expectations, conducting evaluations, and implementing corrective and disciplinary actions as needed. Has responsibility for the oversight of part-time staff; works cooperatively with the Recreation Coordinators to supervise, schedule and train part-time staff; works with part- time staff to correct deficiencies; oversee the preparation and completion of payroll sheets. Reviews payroll and related documentation. Monitors, writes, and negotiates contracts and leases. Plans, coordinates, evaluates, and directs a variety of recreation programs, which may include youth, teen, adult, senior, and specialized program areas; ensures programs meet community needs, align with departmental goals, and achieve established performance and cost recovery objectives. Assists with the development of budget requests and control of expenditures. Assists in the development and implementation of departmental policies, procedures, and strategic initiatives; provides recommendations on program development, service delivery, and operational improvements. Theatre and Facility Management - coordinates usage and rental of the facility for non- profit and commercial groups as well as the general public; prepares rental agreement s for all user groups; processes timely billing and payment receipts; assists the Lead Theatre Technician in technical and specialized equipment operations; works with the Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Page 157 of 1002 2 Lead Theatre Technician to make recommendations for the purchase of equipment and supplies. Oversees the development and distribution of promotional and marketing materials; prepares content for brochures, digital platforms, and other communication channels. Special Event Coordination – plans, coordinates, promotes, and leads implementation of Department hosted or co-sponsored community-wide special events; processes special event permits for non-profit and commercial groups on City property under the direct supervision of the Community Resources Manager; works with event producers and t he city’s special event team to ensure all city policies and procedures are enforced and abided by. Evaluates program participation, expenditures, and cost recovery; develops budget recommendations, monitors program budgets, analyzes financial performance, and prepares financial and operational reports. Film Permit Coordination – processes film permit requests under the direct supervision of the Community Resources Manager; works with producers and the City’s Special Event Team to ensure all City policies and procedures are enforced and abided by. Evaluates and selects contract instructors and service providers; participates in contract development and administration; monitors program quality and participant satisfaction. Coordinates and oversees the use of recreation facilities, including scheduling, permitting, and preparation of agreements; ensures compliance with policies, procedures, and safety standards; processes payments and maintains related records. Oversees community events and activities; leads coordination with internal departments, external agencies, and community partners to ensure successful implementation. Maintains accurate records, reports, and data related to programs, facilities, participation, and operational activities; utilizes recreation management software and administrative systems. Provides support to the Community Resources Manager in all aspects of department operations; performs special assignments as requested. Supports departmental planning, strategic initiatives, and special projects; provides recommendations to management on program improvements and resource needs. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES: Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: Knowledge of: Principles, objectives, and practices of municipal recreation programs and community services; principles and practices of public administration, including program budgeting, contract administration, and operational analysis; principles and practices of program planning, development, implementation, and evaluation; staff supervision, training, and performance management; budgeting, fiscal management, and resource allocation in a municipal context; facility management, permitting, and safe usage of public spaces; marketing, communication, and public engagement strategies; Page 158 of 1002 3 applicable laws, regulations, and safety standards affecting recreation programs and facilities; recordkeeping, data management, and use of recreation management Ability to: plan, organize, implement, and evaluate multiple recreation programs and events, supervise, mentor, and evaluate staff and contract service providers; plan, prioritize, coordinate, and evaluate multiple programs, services, and operational functions; manage budgets, monitor expenditures, and allocate resources efficiently; analyze operational and financial data and make sound recommendations; develop and maintain positive relationships with staff, participants, and community partners; ensure safe, accessible, and well-maintained program sites and facilities; communicate effectively, both orally and in writing, with the public and staff; resolve conflicts, respond to inquiries, and provide high-quality customer service; adapt to changing priorities and manage multiple programs simultaneously. supervise and coordinate the work of subordinate staff; interpret and apply the policies, procedures, laws, and regulations pertaining to assigned programs and functions; respond to requests and inquiries from the general public; operate office equipment including computers and supporting word processing and spreadsheet applications; prepare clear and concise reports; maintain records and reports; communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing; establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Education and Experience: Educational achievement is equivalent to graduation from high school and two years of college-level coursework in recreation or a related field; two years of experience in municipal recreation; and one year of supervisory experience. Graduation from an accredited four year college or university with a degree in Recreation Administration, Public or Business Administration or a closely related field with a minimum of two-years of full time experience in the field of recreation; OR Two years of college-level coursework in recreation or related field with a minimum of four-years of full time experience in the field of recreation; AND minimum of two-year supervisory experience. Licenses/Certificates: Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License with a safe driving record is required and must be maintained as valid during the course of employment. Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt, Not Bold Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt, Not Bold Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt, Not Bold Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Page 159 of 1002 4 PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed in a standard office environment and at indoor and outdoor recreational facilities; travel to different locations; incumbents may be exposed to inclement weather conditions; work and/or walk on various types of surfaces including slippery or uneven surfaces; incumbents may be required to work extended hours including evenings and weekends. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office recreation facility setting; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; to travel to other locations using various modes of private and commercial transportation; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Some program assignments may involve swimming, running, or other physical activities. or other physical activities. or other physical activities. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. Approved by the Civil Service Board: January 11, 2012 Approved by the City Council: Amendment Approved by the Civil Service Board: March 16, 2022 Page 160 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification RECREATION SPECIALIST DEFINITION Under general direction, the Recreation Specialist shall work cooperatively with Parks and Recreation Department staff to provide a variety of recreational services to the public.Under the direct supervision of the Recreation Coordinator(s), the Recreation Specialist shall work cooperatively with the Office Assistant and part-time staff to provide a variety of recreational services to the public; assist in the implementation of program goals and objectives; provide administrative and technical assistance to the delivery of recreation services and programs; and provide information and assistance to customers. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Duties include, but are not limited to: Monitors the Department’s general email account. Processes activity registrations, memberships, and facility reservations using recreation software. Submit, track, and follow up on facility repairs, setup, or maintenance requests. Assists in tthe development and implementation of a variety of department recreation, cultural, and community activities and special events recreation programs and events. Assists in the development, implementation, and enforcement of department policies and procedures. Monitors the use of city facilities, equipment, and supplies. Assists with tracking program and operational expenditures; maintains records and supports budget monitoring activities. Monitoring the Parks & RecreationCommunity Resources Department’s general email account. Process class registrations, memberships, and facility reservations using recreation software. Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Justified Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: Century Gothic, 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Justified Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Justified Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Justified Formatted: Justified Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Normal, Justified, Add space between paragraphs of the same style Formatted: Justified Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Justified Formatted: Font: 11 pt Page 161 of 1002 Creates various reports, visual diagrams, and written instructions for a variety of department programs and activities. Create and post signage, such as reservation signs and no parking signs, for various city facilities. Have proficiency in completing a variety of general administrative duties. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES Knowledge, Skills, & Abilities: Ability to provide exceptional customer service and respond to public inquiries and complaints in an effective and tactful manner; ability to communicate professionally both orally and in writing; ability to manage time and prioritize workload; ability to work well under pressure in a busy environment with constant disruptions and distractions; ability to work cooperatively in a team environment. Ability to solve problems while making sound judgments; the ability to interpret and explain pertinent department policies and procedures; ability to direct and provide guidance to facility users and assist as needed.Knowledge services; basic methods and techniques used in planning, organizing, and implementing recreational activities and events; customer service principles and effective public relations practices; modern office procedures, methods, and equipment, including computer applications and recreation management software; recordkeeping, report preparation, and basic data tracking methods; applicable policies, procedures, and safety practices related to recreation programs and facilities; facility operations, scheduling, and general maintenance coordination; budget tracking concepts and basic expenditure monitoring practices. Ability to: Assist in planning, organizing, and implementing recreation programs, events; provide excellent customer service and communicate effectively with a diverse public, both orally and in writing; interpret and apply department policies and procedures; perform a variety of administrative and technical support tasks with accuracy and attention to detail; use computer systems and recreation software to process registrations, reservations, and reports; monitor facility use and coordinate with staff to ensure safe and effective operations; track program expenditures and maintain accurate financial and activity records; prioritize tasks, meet deadlines, and manage multiple assignments simultaneously; work independently as well as collaboratively within a team environment; and establish and maintain effective working relationships with staff, vendors, and the public. Education and Experience: Any combination of training and experience which that would provide required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge would be: Educational achievement equivalent to graduation from high school and some college-level coursework in recreation or a related field. Previous experience working in a busy office environment that includes frequent interactions with customers or the general public. Experience in a recreational setting or similar field is preferred. Page 162 of 1002 Licenses/Certificates: Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License with a safe driving record is required and must be maintained as valid during the course of employment. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodation may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed in a standard office environment and at indoor and outdoor recreational facilities; travel to different locations; incumbents may be exposed to inclement weather conditions; work and/or walk on various types of surfaces, including slippery or uneven surfaces; incumbents may be required to work extended hours, including evenings and weekends. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office recreation facility setting; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; to travel to other locations using various modes of private and commercial transportation; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Some program assignments may involve swimming, running, or other physical activities. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. Approved by the Civil Service Board: Approved by the City Council: Page 163 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification ACCOUNT SPECIALIST DEFINITION Under supervision, performs clerical and fiscal support duties related to cashiering, accounts receivable, business licensing, parking permits, and citation processing. Receives and processes payments, issues permits and licenses, maintains records, and assists the public and City departments with routine inquiries. Performs related duties as assigned. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Accesses, enters, updates, and maintains customer and account information in City systems; creates new accounts and generates routine reports. Accepts, verifies, and processes payments for City services, permits, licenses, fines, citations, and other receivables in person, by mail, or through electronic systems; enters payments into cashiering systems, verifies receipts, balances cash drawers, and prepares daily reconciliation reports. Assists customers, staff, and other City departments by providing information regarding City taxes, fees, permits, licenses, citations, and related requirements in person, by phone, and through electronic communication. Prepares, processes, and issues notices, invoices, permits, licenses, and related correspondence; reviews applications and supporting documentation for accuracy and required information. Enters, records, and issues business licenses, dog licenses, parking permits, taxi cards, bus passes, garage sale permits, and other related permits in accordance with City procedures. Generates and reviews accounts receivable reports, invoices, and payment records; enters adjustments, tracks collections, and follows up on discrepancies or delinquent accounts. Tracks and logs Transient Occupancy Tax remittances and other City payments; prepares periodic statistical, financial, and collection reports. Verifies tax and fee calculations and reviews supporting documentation prior to processing payments and issuing permits or licenses. Compiles and verifies data from multiple sources; enters information into cashiering, permitting, and financial systems; and generates reports as requested. Page 164 of 1002 2 Maintains records of correspondence, payments, permits, licenses, and related transactions in accordance with City record retention requirements. Receives and records citation appeals and administrative citation hearing requests and routes them to the appropriate department. Coordinates with vendors, customers, and internal departments to resolve payment, invoice, permit, license, and account discrepancies. Provides administrative support for departmental programs and projects, including research, data compilation, spreadsheet preparation, and report support. Performs other related duties as assigned. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES Knowledge, Skills & Abilities: Knowledge of: basic clerical accounting duties; basic principles and procedures of financial record keeping; basic mathematical principles; customer service techniques, practices, and principles; office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers and applicable software applications such as word processing, spreadsheets, and databases; basic pertinent federal, state, and local laws, codes, and regulations including the California Vehicle Code, municipal code, and occupancy code. Ability to: post and calculate mathematical computations rapidly and accurately and operate a ten-key calculator; learn operation of a word processor, printer, cash register, and other equipment as needed; perform tasks in accordance with established policies, regulations and ordinances; deal tactfully and effectively with the public and fellow employees; follow both oral and written instruction; type a minimum of 35 words per minute. Education and Experience: Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge would be: Education: Equivalent to graduation from high school Experience: Two years of responsible clerical accounting experience. Licenses/Certificates: Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License with a safe driving record is required and must be maintained as valid during the course of employment. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodation may be Page 165 of 1002 3 made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with extensive public contact and constant interruptions. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office setting; to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; to occasionally stoop, bend, kneel, crouch, reach, and twist; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. In accordance with California Government Code Section 3100, incumbents are considered disaster service workers and must be available for call-back during major emergencies or disasters. Approved by the Civil Service Board: Approved by the City Council: Page 166 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification LEAD ACCOUNT SPECIALIST DEFINITION Under general direction, the Lead Account Specialist performs complex clerical, fiscal, and administrative duties related to City revenue programs, including cashiering, accounts receivable, business licensing, and citation processing. This role serves as a lead worker, coordinating daily workflow, providing technical support to staff, and assisting the Revenue Services Supervisor with program activities and delinquent account management. DISTINGUISHED CHARACTERISTICS The Lead Account Specialist is the advanced lead-level class in the Account Specialist series. It is distinguished from the Account Specialist by the performance of more complex and difficult tasks requiring greater specialized knowledge, as well as the responsibility to provide lead direction, technical guidance, and training to lower-level staff. While the Account Specialist focuses on routine clerical and fiscal support, the Lead Account Specialist serves as a primary point of contact for troubleshooting system issues and resolving the most complex account discrepancies. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Workflow Coordination: Supports the Revenue Services Supervisor by coordinating daily workflow, providing technical direction to staff, and monitoring assigned tasks and program activities. Payment & Revenue Processing: Accepts, verifies, and processes payments for City services, taxes, permits, and fines via multiple channels; balances cash drawers and prepares daily reconciliation reports. Account Maintenance: Accesses, enters, and updates customer account information in City systems; generates routine and statistical reports; and tracks Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) remittances. Page 167 of 1002 2 Licensing & Permits: Reviews applications and issues business licenses, animal licenses, parking permits, and other City-issued permits in accordance with established codes and procedures. Accounts Receivable: Generates and reviews invoices and payment records; enters adjustments, tracks collections, and researches/resolves complex account discrepancies or delinquent accounts. Customer Support: Responds to complex inquiries from the public and City departments regarding taxes, fees, and ordinances; receives and routes citation appeals and hearing requests. System & Admin Support: Troubleshoots revenue system/ERP issues; maintains financial records per retention requirements; and prepares spreadsheets and data for departmental projects. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: Knowledge of: Advanced principles and procedures of financial record keeping, elementary accounting, and internal control practices. Modern office practices and equipment, including specialized ERP financial/billing software and cashiering systems. Federal, state, and local laws, codes, and regulations, including the California Vehicle Code, Municipal Code, and occupancy tax regulations. Techniques for providing technical direction and coordinating daily workflow for clerical staff. Customer service techniques, mathematical principles, and data verification methods. Ability to: Operate complex ERP financial systems and use advanced Microsoft Excel for data analysis and reporting. Research and resolve complex account discrepancies and troubleshoot revenue system issues. Page 168 of 1002 3 Perform rapid and accurate mathematical computations and operate a ten-key calculator. Communicate effectively, both verbally and in writing, with the ability to explain complex codes and ordinances to the public and staff. Use sound judgment and maintain confidentiality when handling sensitive financial information. Type at a minimum speed of 35 words per minute. Education and Experience: Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge would be: Education: High school diploma or G.E.D. is required. An Associate of Arts (A.A.) degree in accounting, business administration, or a related field is highly desirable. Experience: Four (4) years of increasingly responsible experience in customer service, cash handling/reconciliation, and maintenance of financial records. At least one (1) year of this experience must be in a senior or project-lead capacity, preferably within a municipal revenue or finance environment. Licenses/Certificates: Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License with a safe driving record is required and must be maintained throughout employment. PHYSICIAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodation may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with extensive public contact and constant interruptions. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office setting; to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; to occasionally stoop, bend, kneel, crouch, reach, and twist; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. Page 169 of 1002 4 In accordance with California Government Code Section 3100, incumbents are considered disaster service workers and must be available for call-back during major emergencies or disasters. Approved by the Civil Service Board: Approved by the City Council: Page 170 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification SENIOR ACCOUNTANT DEFINITION Under general supervision, the Senior Accountant performs varied and complex professional accounting duties in the analysis, preparation, and maintenance of financial records and reports for various City accounts and funds. This role ensures conformance with general and governmental accounting practices, policies, and procedures. DISTINGUISHED CHARACTERISTICS The Senior Accountant is the advanced journey-level class in the professional accounting series. It is distinguished from the Accountant by the complexity of assignments, the degree of independence exercised, and the responsibility for city-wide financial oversight. While the Accountant performs professional duties in payroll, general ledger, and reconciliation, the Senior Accountant is responsible for leading the year-end closing process, coordinating external audits, and preparing mandated reports like the ACFR. Furthermore, the Senior Accountant may provide lead direction or direct supervision to staff, whereas the Accountant functions as an individual contributor under general direction. Supervision: May provide lead direction or direct supervision to professional, technical, or clerical accounting staff. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Complex Financial Analysis: Performs high-level analysis and reconciliation of complex funds; monitors fiscal activities to ensure compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) requirements. General Ledger Maintenance: Oversees the maintenance of the City’s general ledger; prepares complex, non-routine, and year-end closing journal entries; manages the year- end "closing of the books" process. Page 171 of 1002 2 Financial Reporting: Prepares comprehensive financial statements, schedules, and reports, including the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and other mandated State and Federal reports. Audit Coordination: Leads and coordinates internal and external audits; prepares extensive audit work papers and schedules; serves as a primary point of contact for auditors to resolve discrepancies and implement internal control improvements. Budgetary Support: Assists in the development, monitoring, and administration of the City’s operating and capital improvement budgets; provides revenue and expenditure forecasting. Payroll & Benefits Oversight: Performs technical review of payroll calculations, tax returns, and retirement reporting (CalPERS); ensures compliance with complex Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) and labor laws. Grants & Fixed Assets: Oversees the accounting and tracking of City grants and fixed assets; ensures proper depreciation schedules and compliance with grant-specific reporting requirements. Supervision & Training: Supervises and trains staff in professional accounting activities; reviews work for accuracy and adherence to City policies. Process Improvement: Evaluates accounting systems and internal controls; recommends and implements improvements to fiscal practices and software systems to enhance efficiency. Technical Advisory: Responds to complex inquiries from City departments, management, and the public regarding financial transactions and City policies. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES Knowledge of: Advanced principles and practices of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) statements; Principles of internal control and financial auditing standards; Advanced laws and regulations governing municipal financial operations, including payroll and tax reporting; Modern financial information systems (ERP) and advanced spreadsheet/database applications; Principles and practices of supervision, training, and performance evaluation. Ability to: Page 172 of 1002 3 Perform complex and technical financial analyses and prepare accurate financial reports; Interpret, apply, and explain complex laws, rules, and regulations; Manage multiple projects simultaneously while meeting strict statutory deadlines; Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing, to technical and non-technical audiences; Supervise, lead, and mentor professional and clerical staff; Exercise sound independent judgment within established policy and procedural guidelines. Education and Experience Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge would be: Education: Bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university in Accounting, Finance, Business Administration, Public Administration, or a closely related field. Experience: Five (5) years of increasingly responsible professional-level accounting experience. At least one (1) year of supervisory experience. Preferred: Experience in governmental or municipal accounting. Licenses/Certificates: Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License with a safe driving record is required. Active Certified Public Accountant (CPA) license, Certified Internal Auditor (CIA) certificate, and/or Certified Government Financial Manager (CGFM) is highly desired. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with extensive public contact and constant interruptions. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office setting; to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; to occasionally stoop, bend, kneel, crouch, reach, and twist; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; to travel to other locations using various modes of private and commercial transportation; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Page 173 of 1002 4 Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. In accordance with California Government Code Section 3100, incumbents are considered disaster service workers and must be available for call-back during major emergencies or disasters. Approved by the Civil Service Board: Approved by the City Council: Page 174 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification REVENUE SERVICES MANAGER DEFINITION Under administrative direction, plans, coordinates, and oversees a variety of City revenue programs, including billing, collections, reporting, and compliance functions. Supports strategic analysis, operational assessments, and compliance initiatives to enhance effectiveness and maintain internal controls. Provides leadership and direction within the Revenue Services Division. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Plans, manages, and coordinates revenue programs and services, including but not limited to business licensing, accounts receivable, transient occupancy tax, revenue enhancements, parking programs and citations, leases, franchise payments, and central cashiering. Participates in the administration and oversight of City revenue programs, including billing, collections, reporting, and compliance functions. Coordinates revenue-related processes to ensure accurate collection, reconciliation, and adherence to internal controls. Supports financial planning activities through data analysis, report preparation, and evaluation of operational processes. Participates in the development and implementation of goals, priorities, schedules, objectives, policies, and procedures for the Revenue Division. Trains, supervises, and evaluates the work of Revenue Services staff. Provides leadership, direction, and oversight of staff and division operations. Prepares and directs the preparation of analytical, statistical, and narrative reports and correspondence. Plans, manages, and completes special projects; assists with budget preparation and implementation. Prepares staff reports and presentations to City Council, Commissions, and public meetings. Page 175 of 1002 2 Authorizes check requests and wire transfers and reviews complex accounting transactions and reconciliations. Assists in compiling financial data and preparing audit materials and supporting documentation. Supports audit and compliance activities by gathering data, evaluating procedures, and assisting with implementation of recommendations. Contributes to the development of reports and documentation required for internal, regulatory, and administrative purposes. Reviews and resolves major customer complaints, identifies issues, and recommends solutions. Oversees complex and escalated issues and ensures effective resolution. Performs other related duties and projects as assigned. QUALIFICATIONS AND GUIDELINES Education and Experience: Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge would be: Educational equivalent to graduation from an accredited college or university with a degree in public administration, business administration, accounting or a related field and four years of increasingly responsible experience in government or a comparable business or non-profit organization is required. A master’s degree in public administration, business administration, accounting or a related field is desirable. One year of supervisory experience is required. Licenses/Certificates: Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License with a safe driving record is required or the ability to get from point to point for meetings and trainings. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with extensive public contact and constant interruptions. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office setting; to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; to occasionally stoop, bend, Page 176 of 1002 3 kneel, crouch, reach, and twist; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; to travel to other locations using various modes of private and commercial transportation; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. In accordance with California Government Code Section 3100, incumbents are considered disaster service workers and must be available for call-back during major emergencies or disasters. Approved by the Civil Service Board: Approved by the City Council: Page 177 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification Human Resources Technician DEFINITION Under general supervision, performs a variety of technical and administrative support duties in the Human Resources and Risk Management Division. Responsibilities include recruitment and selection, employee benefits enrollment, leave administration, personnel records maintenance, and training and development. This position requires a high level of confidentiality and provides technical assistance to City staff and the public. DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS The Human Resources Technician is a technical, paraprofessional classification. It is distinguished from professional-level classifications, such as the Human Resources Analyst/Senior Human Resources Analyst, by its focus on performing specialized administrative and technical support activities rather than complex program management or city-wide policy development. While a Human Resources Analyst/Senior Human Resources Analyst is responsible for independent decision-making in program coordination and serving as a strategic advisor to management, the Human Resources Technician provides the foundational technical support required for recruitment, benefits processing, and records maintenance under established procedures. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Technical Recruitment Support: Prepares and posts job announcements to various online job boards, social media, and professional publications; monitors application flow within the Applicant Tracking System (ATS). Performs initial screen of applications for minimum qualifications; coordinates the mailing of notices to candidates regarding application status. Coordinates logistics for oral board interviews, including securing raters, preparing interview packets, and ensuring a professional environment for candidates. Page 178 of 1002 2 Proctors written and performance examinations; ensures testing materials are secured and scored accurately. Benefits & Personnel Administration: Organizes and conducts new hire orientation sessions; ensures all required tax, retirement, and policy forms are completed and filed. Enters and audits data in the HRIS/ERP system to ensure accurate processing of step increases, promotions, and benefit changes. Monitors and tracks employee leaves of absence; prepares correspondence regarding FMLA/CFRA eligibility and coordinates with payroll on leave status. Responds to routine inquiries from employees and the public regarding employment opportunities, benefit plans, and general HR procedures. Coordinates the scheduling of pre-employment physicals, drug screens, and background checks; tracks results to ensure compliance with City standards. General Administrative & Records Support: Maintains official personnel, medical, and recruitment files in compliance with records retention schedules and privacy laws. Compiles data for annual salary surveys or EEO-1 reporting as directed by professional staff. Processes invoices for HR vendors and maintains tracking logs for the division budget. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES: Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: Knowledge of: Basic principles of public personnel administration; recruitment and testing techniques; HRIS and applicant tracking systems; and standard English usage. Skill in: Composing technical correspondence; performing math for salary/benefit calculations; and establishing effective working relationships with various City departments. Education and Experience: Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge would be: Page 179 of 1002 3 Education: Equivalent to an Associate of Arts degree from an accredited college with major coursework in human resources, business administration, or a related field. Experience: Three (3) years of progressively responsible administrative experience, preferably in a public sector human resources environment. Note: A bachelor’s degree in Business Administration, Public Administration or Human Resources may be substituted for up to two (2) year of experience. Licenses: Possession of a valid California driver’s license and an acceptable driving record. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodation may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with extensive public contact and constant interruptions. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office setting; to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; to occasionally stoop, bend, kneel, crouch, reach, and twist; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; to travel to other locations using various modes of private and commercial transportation; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. Approved by the Civil Service Board: Approved by the City Council: Page 180 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification Senior Human Resources Analyst DEFINITION The Senior Human Resources Analyst is the advanced journey-level classification in the HR series. Under general direction, the incumbent performs the most complex professional, technical, and analytical activities across all functional areas of Human Resources and Risk Management, including recruitment, classification and compensation, labor relations, and benefits administration, and risk management. DISTINGUISHED CHARACTERISTICS The Senior Human Resources Analyst is distinguished from the Human Resources Analyst by the complexity of assignments and the level of independence exercised. While the Human Resources Analyst performs professional-level duties in support of recruitment, benefits, and risk management, the Senior level is responsible for city-wide program management, policy development, and labor relations. The Senior level further differs by providing lead direction and mentorship to professional and clerical staff, whereas the Human Resources Analyst level focuses on performing technical and administrative assignments under general direction. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Strategic Program Leadership & Policy: Performs a wide variety of the most complex professional, technical, and analytical duties in support of the City’s Human Resources and Risk Management Division. Recommends and implements improvements to City-wide policies and procedures; ensures all personnel activities maintain accuracy, completeness, and compliance with City standards and legal mandates. Leads the research, development, and maintenance of a variety of complex reports and analytic projects; prepares and submits formal recommendations to the City Manager and City Council. Page 181 of 1002 2 Provides lead direction and mentorship to professional and clerical personnel; reviews work products for quality control and ensures delivery of outstanding internal and external customer service. Advanced Recruitment & Talent Management: Oversees and manages the full-cycle recruitment and selection process; develops job announcement advertisements and innovative sourcing strategies. Designs and validates employment examinations; organizes oral interview boards and orients raters; and ensures eligibility lists are maintained according to established Civil Service procedures. Serves as a primary liaison to the Civil Service Board; prepares agendas, attends meetings, and presents staff reports on complex personnel matters. Manages the onboarding process, providing high-level orientation and explaining complex City employment policies and procedures to new hires. Labor Relations & Compensation: Conducts comprehensive analytic research and compiles sensitive data pertaining to employer-employee relations; assists in the preparation for labor negotiations and ensures the accuracy of data used in bargaining. Leads and conducts complex salary and benefit surveys; performs deep-dive analysis of market data and prepares summaries to support classification and compensation decisions. Oversees the employee performance review schedule and advises departments on the evaluation process to ensure consistency and compliance. Risk Management & Benefits Administration: Directs the administration of employee benefit plans; coordinates open enrollment and manages changes in insurance plans for both active employees and retirees. Oversees pre-employment and annual physical examinations; verifies the accuracy of complex medical invoices and ensures compliance with occupational health standards. Administrative & Fiscal Oversight: Leads the preparation and monitoring of the department budget; analyzes expenditures and provides projections for future staffing and program needs. Page 182 of 1002 3 Oversees the maintenance of official personnel records and ensures the integrity of the Personnel Action Form (PAF) process. Directs and participates in committees for City-wide employee events, including all-city meetings, annual awards ceremonies, and wellness initiatives. Acts as a point of escalation for complex inquiries received via telephone, in person, or email, and performs other related high-level work as required. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES Knowledge, Skills and Abilities Advanced Knowledge of: Principles of public personnel administration; EEO, ADA, FLSA, and FMLA/CFRA laws; Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA); and advanced statistical methods for compensation analysis. Ability to: Analyze complex problems and develop valid conclusions; communicate persuasively with employee associations; handle confidential information with extreme discretion; and prepare clear, concise staff reports for City Council. Education and Experience Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge would be: Education: A Bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university with major coursework in Human Resources, Public Administration, Business Administration, or a closely related field (a Master’s degree is highly desirable), AND Experience: Four (4) years of increasingly responsible professional-level experience in public sector human resources. Experience in a municipal setting is strongly preferred. Working Conditions Positions in this class typically work in an office environment with moderate noise levels, controlled temperature conditions, and no direct exposure to hazardous physical substances. Occasional evening meetings may be required. Page 183 of 1002 4 PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with extensive public contact and constant interruptions. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office setting; to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; to occasionally stoop, bend, kneel, crouch, reach, and twist; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; to travel to other locations using various modes of private and commercial transportation; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. In accordance with California Government Code Section 3100, incumbents are considered disaster service workers and must be available for call-back during major emergencies or disasters. Approved by the Civil Service Board: Approved by the City Council: Page 184 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification RECREATION SUPERVISOR DEFINITION Under general supervision, the Recreation Supervisor coordinates and oversees assigned recreation programs, services, and facilities, supervises and evaluates staff, and provides administrative support while ensuring effective, efficient, and high-quality program and operational outcomes. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Duties may include any combination of the following: Provides effective customer service to the public; responds to public inquiries in person, over the phone and/or by e-mail; resolves complaints and issues in a professional and timely manner. Recruits, selects, trains, schedules, supervises, and evaluates staff and volunteers; establishes performance expectations and implements corrective and disciplinary actions as needed. Prepares, reviews, and approves payroll and related documentation for part-time staff. Plans, organizes, implements, and evaluates a variety of recreation programs, which may include youth, teen, adult, senior, and specialized program areas; ensures programs meet community needs and established objectives. Assists in the development and implementation of program goals, policies, and procedures; evaluates operations and recommends service delivery improvements. Coordinates program logistics including scheduling, staffing, site preparation, and participant registration; ensures safe, clean, and appropriate program environments. Develops and distributes promotional and marketing materials; prepares content for brochures, digital platforms, and other communication channels. Monitors program participation, expenditures, and cost recovery; tracks budgets, analyzes financial performance, and makes recommendations to improve cost efficiency and revenue generation. Recruits, coordinates, and evaluates contract instructors and service providers; monitors program quality and participant satisfaction. Page 185 of 1002 2 Coordinates the use of recreation facilities, including scheduling, permitting, and preparation of agreements; ensures compliance with policies, procedures, and safety standards; processes payments and maintains related records. Leads the planning, coordination, and implementation of community events and activities; collaborates with internal departments, community groups, and external partners. Maintains and oversees accurate records and reports related to program participation, facility use, and operations; utilizes recreation management software, and other administrative systems. Assists with department facilities general oversight, including upkeeping, and identifying potential hazards or other safety concerns. Provides administrative and operational support to management staff; participates in departmental planning efforts and special projects. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES Knowledge of: Principles, objectives, and practices of municipal recreation programs and services, including youth, teen, adult, senior, and community-based activities; principles and practices of program planning, implementation, coordination, and evaluation; methods of effectively supervising, training, and evaluating part-time staff and volunteers; customer service principles and techniques, including responding to public inquiries and resolving conflicts; principles of facility management, scheduling, permitting, and safe usage of community facilities; budgeting, fiscal management, and cost recovery procedures relevant to recreation programs; marketing, publicity, and communication strategies for promoting programs, events, and services; applicable laws, regulations, and safety standards related to municipal recreation operations; and recordkeeping and use of recreation management software and other administrative tools. Ability to: Plan, organize, implement, and evaluate recreation programs and special events; recruit, supervise, train, and evaluate part-time staff, contract instructors, and volunteers; provide excellent customer service and respond effectively to public inquiries and concerns; coordinate program logistics, including scheduling, site preparation, registration, and staffing; develop and maintain promotional materials and digital content for programs and services; monitor program participation, expenditures, and resource utilization; assist with budget tracking; ensure safe, clean, and accessible program sites and facilities; establish and maintain effective working relationships with staff, supervisors, community groups, and the public; adapt to changing program needs and manage multiple priorities effectively. Page 186 of 1002 3 Education and Experience Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge and abilities would be: Education: Equivalent to graduation from high school and two years of college-level coursework in recreation or a related field. Experience: Two years of experience in municipal recreation. Licenses/Certificates: Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License with a safe driving record is required and must be maintained as valid during the course of employment. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodation may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed in a standard office environment and indoor and outdoor recreational facilities; travel to different locations; incumbents may be exposed to inclement weather conditions; work and/or walk on various types of surfaces, including slippery or uneven surfaces; incumbents may be required to work extended hours, including evenings and weekends. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office recreation facility setting; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; to travel to other locations using various modes of private and commercial transportation; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Some program assignments may involve swimming, running, or other physical activities. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. In accordance with California Government Code Section 3100, incumbents are considered disaster service workers and must be available for call-back during major emergencies or disasters. Approved by the Civil Service Board: Approved by the City Council: Page 187 of 1002 4 Page 188 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification PARKS AND RECREATION MANAGER DEFINITION Under the direction of the Parks and Recreation Director, the Parks and Recreation Manager plans, organizes, coordinates, and manages programs, services, facilities, and operations of the Parks and Recreation Department, and provides administrative and operational support to departmental functions. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Duties may include, but are not limited to the following: Manages and coordinates assigned cultural, educational, recreational, community, social service programs, and special events. Implements and administers policies, procedures, and regulations governing department operations, programs, and facility use. Prepares cost analyses of programs and facility operations. Prepares and submits recommendations for program and facility fees for review and approval. Provides input and recommendations on department policy and operational matters. Coordinates assigned department activities with other City departments, outside agencies, and community organizations. Selects, trains, supervises, evaluates, and disciplines staff directly or through department supervisors. Serves as staff liaison to community groups as assigned. Prepares, administers, and monitors grants. Implements and monitors risk management and liability procedures for program operations. Monitors, writes, and negotiates contracts and leases. Review and processing of personnel schedules and payroll. Page 189 of 1002 2 Identifies and assists in the preparation of recommendations for necessary repair, capital improvement, and capital outlay for recreation facilities. Assists with department facilities general oversight, maintenance and upkeeping needs. Makes recommendations for the purchase of equipment and supplies. Assists with the development and monitors the administration of the Department budget. Supports and maintains positive community relations. Serves as liaison with other government agencies as it relates to assigned programs and services. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES Knowledge of: Principles, practices, and objectives of municipal recreation, social, cultural, and community service programs; principles and practices of public administration, supervision, and program management, including budget preparation and monitoring; applicable laws, regulations, and ordinances affecting program and facility operations; development and use of community and multi-purpose facilities; general principles of theater and facility operations; functions and operations of non- profit organizations; program development methods and practices; contract and lease administration practices; computers and applicable software applications; report writing methods and techniques; community organization, resources, and facilities; basic land and facility maintenance principles; employee training and supervision; and public relations principles and practices. Ability to: Plan, organize, coordinate, and evaluate assigned programs and services; analyze operations and recommend improvements to programs and service delivery; assist in the preparation and monitoring of program budgets; supervise, train, and evaluate staff; assess facility and program needs and make recommendations; coordinate facility and program operations, including specialized venues such as theaters; prepare and present clear and concise written and oral reports; establish and maintain effective working relationships with City staff, consultants, commission and board members, representatives of outside agencies, and the public; and support and implement effective public outreach and community relations efforts. Education and Experience: Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge and abilities would be: Page 190 of 1002 3 Education: Graduation from an accredited four-year college or university with a degree in Recreation Administration, Public or Business Administration, Theater Arts Management, or a closely related field. Experience: Three years of increasingly responsible professional recreational, community service, and park management experience, including at least two years in a supervisory or administrative capacity. Licenses/Certificates: Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License with a safe driving record is required and must be maintained as valid during the course of employment. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT The conditions herein are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential job functions. Environment: Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with extensive public contact and constant interruptions. Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office setting; to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time; to occasionally stoop, bend, kneel, crouch, reach, and twist; to lift, carry, push, and/or pull light to moderate amounts of weight; to operate office equipment requiring repetitive hand movement and fine coordination including use of a computer keyboard; to travel to other locations using various modes of private and commercial transportation; and to verbally communicate to exchange information. Vision: See in the normal visual range with or without correction. Hearing: Hear in the normal audio range with or without correction. In accordance with California Government Code Section 3100, incumbents are considered disaster service workers and must be available for call-back during major emergencies or disasters. Approved by the Civil Service Board: Approved by the City Council: Page 191 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Class Specification Senior Crime Prevention and Intelligence Analyst DEFINITION Under general to limited direction, the Senior Crime Analyst performs advanced, complex crime and intelligence analysis functions and serves as a subject-matter expert in analytical methodologies, crime trend forecasting, and intelligence-led policing strategies. The Senior Crime Analyst leads and coordinates analytical efforts; develops advanced analytical products; advises command staff on operational, tactical, and strategic decision-making; and may provide technical guidance and functional supervision to lower-level analytical staff. This classification is distinguished from the Crime and Intelligence Analyst by the level of independence exercised, complexity of assignments, strategic scope, and responsibility for program development and interagency coordination. DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS The Crime and Intelligence Analyst performs professional analytical work under general direction with a primary focus on crime pattern identification and operational support. The Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst serves as a lead analyst, managing complex, sensitive, and high-impact analytical projects; developing analytical standards and methodologies; mentoring analysts; and acting as a key advisor to command staff. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: Leads and performs advanced crime, intelligence, and strategic analysis using multiple internal and external data sources to identify emerging crime trends, series, patterns, and long-term crime conditions. Designs, implements, and evaluates analytical methodologies, models, and frameworks to support intelligence-led policing, problem-oriented policing, and data-driven deployment strategies. Conducts sophisticated statistical, spatial, and temporal analyses, including predictive analysis and advanced forecasting techniques, to assess crime risk and resource allocation needs. Page 192 of 1002 2 Develops and presents high-level analytical products, including strategic assessments, threat analyses, command-level briefings, and executive summaries for Police Department leadership and City management. Serves as the primary analytical advisor to command staff regarding crime trends, operational impacts, deployment strategies, and proactive enforcement initiatives. Oversees the preparation and dissemination of complex analytical products such as crime series bulletins, hotspot analyses, crime reduction strategies, after-action reports, and intelligence summaries. Coordinates analytical support for major investigations, task forces, critical incidents, and special operations, including officer-involved incidents and major crime events. Provides functional supervision and technical guidance to Crime and Intelligence Analysts, including reviewing work products, establishing analytical priorities, and ensuring quality control and consistency. Develops, maintains, and enhances analytical databases, crime analysis systems, and reporting processes to improve accuracy, efficiency, and usability of crime data. Establishes and maintains liaison with local, regional, state, and federal law enforcement agencies to exchange intelligence, collaborate on joint analytical efforts, and support regional crime initiatives. Supports grant applications, audits, and program evaluations by providing analytical data, outcome measurements, and performance indicators. Provides analytical support to community policing initiatives, crime prevention programs, and public safety presentations as assigned. May testify in court regarding analytical methodologies, data interpretation, and conclusions drawn from crime analysis reports. May be required to work evenings, weekends, holidays, and be available for callback during major incidents, disasters, or critical events. Performs related duties as assigned. QUALIFICATION GUIDELINES Knowledge, Skills & Abilities Knowledge of: Advanced crime analysis, intelligence analysis, and criminal investigative methodologies; Statistical analysis, spatial analysis, and crime forecasting techniques; Intelligence-led policing, problem-oriented policing, and deployment strategies; Law enforcement records management systems, CAD/RMS systems, and criminal justice databases; Principles of criminal intelligence, information sharing, and confidentiality standards; Research design, data validation, and performance measurement in law enforcement Page 193 of 1002 3 settings; Applicable laws, regulations, and best practices related to crime analysis and intelligence functions Skill in: Conducting complex statistical and spatial analyses using analytical software and databases; Preparing clear, concise, and persuasive written reports and executive-level presentations; Communicating complex analytical concepts to sworn and civilian personnel; Managing multiple complex projects with competing deadlines; Establishing effective working relationships with law enforcement personnel, City staff, and external agencies Ability to: Exercise sound judgment and discretion in handling sensitive and confidential information; Independently plan, organize, and prioritize analytical work; Identify emerging crime issues and translate data into actionable strategies; Lead, mentor, and provide technical guidance to analytical staff; Attend meetings outside normal work hours as required Education and Experience: Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain this required knowledge would be: Education: Graduation from an accredited four-year college or university with a major in Criminal Justice, Criminology, Public Administration, Statistics, Data Science, or a closely related field. Experience: Four (4) years of progressively responsible professional experience in crime analysis, intelligence analysis, or related analytical work within a law enforcement or public safety environment, Including at least one (1) year performing duties equivalent to a Crime and Intelligence Analyst, or equivalent analytical experience demonstrating advanced responsibility and independence. Licenses/Certificates: Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License with a satisfactory driving record, to be maintained throughout employment. Crime analysis or intelligence-related professional certifications (e.g., CALEA, IACA, or equivalent) are desirable but not required. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT Environment: Work is primarily performed in a standard office environment with frequent public and interdepartmental contact and regular interruptions. Page 194 of 1002 4 Physical: Primary functions require sufficient physical ability and mobility to work in an office setting; sit or stand for extended periods; occasionally stoop, bend, kneel, crouch, reach, and twist; lift and carry light to moderate objects; operate standard office equipment including computers requiring repetitive hand movements; and verbally communicate to exchange information. Vision: Normal visual acuity with or without correction. Hearing: Normal auditory acuity with or without correction. In accordance with California Government Code Section 3100, incumbents are considered disaster service workers and must be available for call-back during major emergencies or disasters. Approved by the Civil Service Board: Approved by the City Council: Page 195 of 1002 GRADE TITLE E02 CITY COUNCIL $848 Month E05 CITY TREASURER $530 Month GRADE TITLE Monthly Salary Range M45 CITY MANAGER $20,000 $24,152 Monthly Salary Range GRADE TITLE Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 M04 CITY CLERK* $11,412 $11,983 $12,582 $13,211 M05 COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR $15,907 $16,702 $17,538 $18,415 M20 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR* $16,590 $17,420 $18,291 $19,205 M25 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR $16,692 $17,527 $18,403 $19,323 M35 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR* $16,693 $17,527 $18,404 $19,324 M40 POLICE CHIEF* $19,291 $19,870 $20,864 $21,907 Monthly Salary Range GRADE TITLE Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 P01 POLICE CAPTAIN $15,487 $16,261 $17,074 $17,928 P03 POLICE LIEUTENANT* $14,217 $14,928 $15,674 $16,458 Monthly Salary Range GRADE TITLE Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 P05 POLICE SERGEANT* $11,109 $11,664 $12,247 $12,860 P10 POLICE OFFICER* $8,839 $9,281 $9,745 $10,232 P13 POLICE RECRUIT/ACADEMY RECRUIT (75% OF OFFICER)$6,629 Monthly Salary Range GRADE TITLE Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 G33 ACCOUNT CLERK $5,025 $5,277 $5,541 $5,818 $6,108 G08 ACCOUNT SPECIALIST $5,151 $5,409 $5,680 $5,963 $6,261 G43 BUILDING & PLANNING TECHNICIAN $5,584 $5,863 $6,156 $6,464 $6,787 G01 BUILDING INSPECTOR $7,225 $7,586 $7,965 $8,364 $8,782 G06 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER* $6,472 $6,796 $7,135 $7,492 $7,867 G31 COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER* $5,382 $5,651 $5,934 $6,231 $6,542 G24 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN* $6,093 $6,398 $6,718 $7,054 $7,406 G25 EQUIPMENT MECHANIC $5,819 $6,110 $6,415 $6,736 $7,073 G09 LEAD ACCOUNT SPECIALIST $5,569 $5,847 $6,140 $6,447 $6,769 G41 MAINTENANCE I* $4,651 $4,883 $5,127 $5,384 $5,653 G29 MAINTENANCE II* $5,337 $5,604 $5,884 $6,178 $6,487 G39 OFFICE ASSISTANT $4,551 $4,779 $5,018 $5,269 $5,532 G13 POLICE SERVICE OFFICER $5,649 $5,932 $6,228 $6,540 $6,867 G05 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR $6,775 $7,114 $7,469 $7,843 $8,235 G02 RECREATION SPECIALIST $3,564 $3,742 $3,929 $4,126 $4,332 G23 SENIOR ACCOUNT CLERK* $5,569 $5,847 $6,140 $6,447 $6,769 G45 SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT* $5,308 $5,573 $5,852 $6,145 $6,452 G03 LEAD SPECIAL EVENTS AND FILIMING COORDINATOR $6,090 $6,395 $6,715 $7,050 $7,403 G04 SPECIAL EVENTS AND FILMING COORDINATOR $5,084 $5,338 $5,605 $5,885 $6,180 Monthly Salary Range POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (POA) City of Hermosa Beach Salary Schedule EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2025 - JUNE 30, 2026 ELECTED OFFICIALS MANAGEMENT GROUP POLICE MANAGEMENT GENERAL & SUPERVISORY BARGAINING UNIT - TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 SUPERVISORY CLASSIFICATIONS Page 196 of 1002 GRADE TITLE Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 S01 CREW SUPERVISOR* $7,053 $7,406 $7,776 $8,165 $8,573 S03 SENIOR EQUIPMENT MECHANIC* $7,684 $8,068 $8,471 $8,895 $9,339 S07 COMMUNITY SERVICES FIELD SUPERVISOR* $6,773 $7,111 $7,467 $7,840 $8,232 S09 POLICE SERVICE OFFICER SUPERVISOR* $6,776 $7,114 $7,470 $7,844 $8,236 Monthly Salary Range GRADE TITLE Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 A31 ACCOUNTANT $7,393 $7,763 $8,151 $8,559 $8,987 A19 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $6,541 $6,868 $7,212 $7,572 $7,951 A22 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COORDINATOR $7,705 $8,090 $8,495 $8,919 $9,365 A04 ASSISTANT ENGINEER*$8,084 $8,488 $8,913 $9,358 $9,826 A06 ASSISTANT PLANNER*$6,668 $7,002 $7,352 $7,719 $8,105 A02 ASSOCIATE ENGINEER*$9,359 $9,827 $10,318 $10,834 $11,376 A05 ASSOCIATE PLANNER $7,967 $8,365 $8,784 $9,223 $9,684 A03 BUILDING & CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL $12,575 $13,204 $13,864 $14,557 $15,285 A41 CITY ENGINEER $13,591 $14,271 $14,984 $15,734 $16,520 A29 COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER $9,413 $9,883 $10,378 $10,896 $11,441 A30 CRIME & INTELLIGENCE ANALYST $8,075 $8,479 $8,903 $9,348 $9,816 A21 DEPUTY CITY CLERK $7,045 $7,397 $7,767 $8,155 $8,563 A33 DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER $12,208 $12,818 $13,459 $14,132 $14,839 A34 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR*$10,002 $10,502 $11,027 $11,578 $12,157 A42 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO POLICE CHIEF $6,868 $7,211 $7,572 $7,951 $8,348 A37 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS MANAGER $10,876 $11,420 $11,991 $12,590 $13,220 A24 GIS & IT ANALYST $8,623 $9,054 $9,507 $9,982 $10,481 A28 MANAGEMENT ANALYST $7,337 $7,703 $8,089 $8,493 $8,918 A46 PARKS AND RECREATION MANAGER $9,997 $10,497 $11,022 $11,573 $12,151 A01 PLANNING MANAGER $12,575 $13,204 $13,864 $14,557 $15,285 A43 PUBLIC WORKS ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT $8,245 $8,657 $9,090 $9,545 $10,022 A07 PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT**$9,901 $10,396 $10,916 $11,461 $12,035 A16 RECREATION COORDINATOR $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,943 $7,291 A45 RECREATION SUPERVISOR $6,709 $7,044 $7,397 $7,767 $8,155 A11 REVENUE SERVICES SUPERVISOR*$8,736 $9,173 $9,631 $10,113 $10,619 A47 REVENUE SERVICES MANAGER $10,876 $11,420 $11,991 $12,590 $13,220 A48 SENIOR ACCOUNTANT $8,559 $8,987 $9,436 $9,908 $10,404 A49 SENIOR CRIME & INTELLIGENCE ANALYST $8,728 $9,164 $9,622 $10,103 $10,608 A39 SENIOR ENGINEER*$12,976 $13,625 $14,306 $15,021 $15,772 A18 SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST $8,728 $9,164 $9,622 $10,103 $10,608 A15 SR RECREATION SUPERVISOR $7,152 $7,509 $7,885 $8,279 $8,693 Monthly Salary Range GRADE TITLE Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 A13 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER $7,621 $8,002 $8,402 $8,822 $9,263 A10 FINANCE MANAGER*$11,725 $12,311 $12,927 $13,573 $14,252 A14 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST* $8,067 $8,470 $8,894 $9,339 $9,806 M02 HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER $12,507 $13,132 $13,789 $14,478 $15,202 G10 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN $5,784 $6,073 $6,377 $6,696 $7,031 A20 RISK PROGRAM MANAGER $10,876 $11,420 $11,991 $12,590 $13,220 A44 SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST $9,596 $10,076 $10,580 $11,110 $11,665 *salary adjustment per compensation study **salary adjustment for emergency call-out program duties PROFESSIONAL & ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEE GROUP UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEE GROUP Page 197 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-CMO-027 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING NEW CATEGORY AND FEE FOR COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT AREAS (Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council 1. Adopt a resolution establishing a new category and fee for certain commercial encroachment areas in commercial zones (Attachment 4); and 2. Amend the Master Fee schedule to reflect the new fee. Executive Summary: At its April 28, 2026, meeting, Council conceptually approved a Resolution establishing a new category and fee for outdoor dining encroachments on public property and directed staff to bring back a Resolution to that effect that excludes applying such fees to commercial businesses operating in residential zones. Background: The City has long supported and encouraged outdoor dining on private and public property to activate place-making strategies and supplement indoor operations. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and related health orders, businesses were limited to conducting business outdoors. Recognizing this hardship, City Council approved a program to allow expanded outdoor dining and other commercial activity. Th e City also suspended zoning and parking requirements to allow outdoor dining on private property and established a temporary encroachment permit program to allow encroachments into sidewalks and public streets. The City further allowed existing permanent encroachments, such as those on Pier Plaza, to temporarily expand their encroachment areas. The City has issued over 60 temporary outdoor dining permits in a variety of commercial locations. Though mostly on and around Pier Plaza, encroachments are spread throughout the City’s main commercial areas (Attachment 1). Initially, City Council allowed these uses without consideration of any encroachment area rents or reimbursement of lost parking meter revenue. At its January 25, 2022, meeting, Council discussed implementing new fees for the temporary outdoor dining encroachments and approved a fee of $1.50 per square foot per month. Page 198 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 3 At its February 8, 2022, meeting, Council approved reinstatement of the prior permanent encroachment fees. At its November 3, 2022, meeting, Council extended the temporary program with direction to staff to return with an item to consider a permanent version of the temporary outdoor dining program for Council’s consideration. At that same meeting, Council directed staff to return with an update on encroachment fees. On June 13, 2023, Council approved Resolution 23 -7379 (Attachment 2), which established encroachment fees for the 2023-2024 fiscal year, as well as the two following fiscal years. Fees for fiscal year 2025 -2026 went into effect July 1, 2025, and remain in place. There are no additional rate increases scheduled for the encroachment areas beyond these approved by Council in 2023: Encroachment Area Category Approved Fee per square foot, per month for 2023-2024 Approved Fee per square foot, per month for 2024-2025 Approved Fee per square foot, per month for 2025-2026 Pier Plaza, closes encroachment at 12:30am $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 Pier Plaza, closes encroachment at 11pm $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 Pier Plaza, closes encroachment before 11pm; off-Pier Plaza; on- street; sidewalk; retail $1.00 $2.00 $2.50 Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description January 13, 2026 Requested staff to bring back an item to discuss possible encroachment fee revisions March 10, 2026 Approved a new category and fee for certain commercial encroachments April 28, 2026 Directed staff to return with a Resolution establishing new fee and category with an exclusion for encroachments in residential zones Discussion: In 2023, City Council considered various factors to help inform these fees. These included location (with Pier Plaza being most desirable), amount of staff resources needed to administer (enforcement, inspection, maintenance, etc.) and complexity of the encroachment areas (e.g., constructed on-street dining deck versus sidewalk tables and chairs that are movable). Overall, the number of encroachment permittees has remained essentially the same during this time though a few on-street dining areas (dining decks) have been removed. Page 199 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 3 At the January 13, 2026, meeting, Council suggested creating a new category for commercial dining establishments outside of Pier Plaza that do not offer table service nor alcohol use in the encroachment areas. For comparison, the City of Manhattan Beach charges $4 per square foot for all commercial encroachments. The City of Redondo Beach charges $2 for encroachments that serve alcohol and $1 for those that do not. At the March 10, 2026, City Council meeting, after considering various rate and category scenarios, Council approved a new category for businesses both on and off Pier Plaza that do not have table service nor serve alcohol on their encroachments. For this new category, Council approved a fee reduction from $2.50 per square foot to $1.00 per square foot, applied retroactively to January 1, 2026. This new category currently applies to six businesses covering a total of 2400 square feet of public right-of-way (Attachment 3). This total includes Gitanas which was recently included in the program under this category. At the April 28, 2026, City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to return with a revised Resolution that excludes charging any fee for encroachments on public property by commercial businesses within residential zones. Staff recommends adopting the Resolution. Staff will invoice these businesses accordingly. Fiscal Impact: The City collects approximately $200,000 per quarter in commercial encroachment fees. The seven businesses in the new business category total 2130 square feet and would generate $63,900 in encroachment fees at $2.50 per square foot. At $1.00 per square foot, these seven businesses are expected to generate $25,560 annually, which is a $38,340 reduction in encroachment fees. Attachments: 1. Map of Encroachment Areas 2. Resolution 23-7379 3. Fee Log 4. Draft Resolution Respectfully Submitted by: Douglas Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 200 of 1002 HermosaAvePie r Ave Manhattan A v e Ardmore AveManhat tanAveValley DrMonterey BlvdHermosa Ave2nd St 1st St 22ndS tHer mo s a Av e 27 th S tHer mosaAveManhat t anAveGreenwichVillageOff-Street On-Street Pier Plaza Sidewalk Commercial Encroachment Areas Coni'SeafoodBarnacles Brothers BurritoHennessey's TavernPanela'sWaterman'sThe LighthouseBonaparte BistroTreasure ChestAmerican JunkiesBaja SharkeezPatrick Malloy'sPlaya HermosaOakberry AcaiHeavenly CouturePier SurfPalmilla'sCafe BonaparteSpyder IITiki KaiJuicedT a c o s E l G a l o s o Zane's Paisano's Pizza UncorkedEl TarascoHook & PlowStecca TavernThe Source CafeRockefellerCreme De La CrepeJava Man Japonica Pedone's Hermosa Brewing Co Good Stuff Beach House La Playita Mickey's Deli Bottle Inn The Green Store North End Bar & Grill Vinfolk Martha'sProudly Serving F u n d am e n t a l C o a s t Gitana Cafe Page 201 of 1002 Page 1 of 2 #23-7379 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESOLUTION NO. 23-7379 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMANENT OUTDOOR DINING AND RETAIL ENCROACHMENTS WHEREAS, On June 9, 2020, the Hermosa Beach City Council adopted Ordinance No. 20-1410U, Implementing a Temporary Permit for Outdoor Dining/Seating and Outdoor Retail Display to Assist in the Reopening of Restaurants, Food, and Retail Establishments during COVID-19; and WHEREAS, In October 2021, City Council directed staff to develop permanent versions of the temporary extended outdoor dining and lane reconfiguration programs implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, In January of 2022, City Council approved new fees for the temporary encroachment areas allowed during COVID-19; and WHEREAS, On January 24, 2023, City Council considered a new market rate appraisal of both existing and temporary encroachment areas citywide; and WHEREAS, On April 25, 2023, City Council considered a new proposed rate schedule from City staff and suggested numerous modifications; and WHEREAS, City staff has gathered input from the City Council, neighboring agencies, local businesses, and community stakeholders to develop a fee schedule that is reasonable and that captures the variety of encroachment uses in the City. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby declare that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby adopts the following encroachment fees to go into effect July 1, 2023, and directs City staff to incorporate these into the City’s Master Fee schedule: DocuSign Envelope ID: 455AAA2F-83E4-4696-89E2-82B51186441D Page 202 of 1002 Page 2 of 2 #23-7379 Encroachment Area Category Proposed Fee per square foot, per month for 2023-24 Proposed Fee per square foot, per month for 2024-25 Proposed Fee per square foot, per month for 2025-26 Pier Plaza (business serves alcohol), closes after midnight $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 Pier Plaza (business serves alcohol), closes before midnight $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 Pier Plaza (business does not serve alcohol), closes before midnight; off-Pier Plaza; on- street; sidewalk; retail $1.00 $2.00 $2.50 SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this resolution is found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Resolution. SECTION 4. Environmental Review. The City Council’s adoption of the Resolution is not a project pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, section 15378(b)(4). The Resolution is a government funding mechanism and fiscal activity that does not commit to any specific project. As such, the City Council action on the proposed resolution is not a project under CEQA. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution which shall be effective upon its adoption. The City Manager may delay the implementation of this resolution to ensure continuity and effective and efficient execution of the Pier Plaza outdoor dining program. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this 13th day, June 2023. Mayor Raymond A. Jackson PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ ________________________________ Myra Maravilla, MPA, CMC, Patrick Donegan, City Clerk City Attorney DocuSign Envelope ID: 455AAA2F-83E4-4696-89E2-82B51186441D Page 203 of 1002 State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) ss City of Hermosa Beach ) June 14, 2023 Certification of Council Action RESOLUTION NO. 23-7379 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMANENT OUTDOOR DINING AND RETAIL ENCROACHMENTS I, Myra Maravilla, City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 23-7379 was duly approved and adopted by the City Council of said City at its regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of June 2023 and passed by the following vote: AYES:MAYOR JACKSON, MAYOR PRO TEMPORE MASSEY, COUNCILMEMBERS SAEMANN, and DETOY NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT:COUNCILMEMBER FRANCOIS ________________________________ Myra Maravilla, MPA, CMC, City Clerk DocuSign Envelope ID: 455AAA2F-83E4-4696-89E2-82B51186441D Page 204 of 1002 Business Name Address Total Area (s.f.) Proposed Billing Rate (per sq ft) 1 American Junkie 60 Pier Ave 972 $6.00 2 Baja Sharkeez 52 Pier Ave 750 $6.00 3 Barnacles Bar & Grill 837 Hermosa Ave 300 $2.50 4 Bonaparte Bistro 36 Pier Ave 500 $4.00 5 Tiki Kai 73 Pier Ave 750 $4.00 6 Brother's Burrito 24 11th St 450 $1.00 7 Cafe Bonaparte 53 Pier Ave 750 $2.50 8 Intent Hospitality - Vinfolk 1501 Hermosa Ave 96 $2.50 9 Coastal Lobster & Beer 844 Hermosa Ave 692 $2.50 10 Creme de le Crepe 424 Pier Ave 224 $2.50 11 El Tarasco 337 Pier Ave 525 $2.50 12 Fundamental Coast 112 Pier Ave 15 $2.50 13 Gitanas 2600 Hermosa Ave 189 $1.00 14 Good Stuff on the Strand 1286 The Strand 1000 $2.50 15 Heavenly Couture 31 Pier Ave 150 $2.50 16 Hennessey's Tavern 8 Pier Ave 1000 $6.00 17 Hermosa Breweing Co 1342 Hermosa Ave 372 $2.50 18 Hook and Plow 425 Pier Ave 417 $2.50 19 Japonica Sushi 1314 Hermosa Ave 441 $2.50 20 Java Man 157 Pier Ave 112 $1.00 21 Juiced 34 Pier Ave 239 $2.50 22 La Playita 37 14th St 480 $2.50 23 Martha's 22nd Street Grill 25 22nd St 730 $2.50 24 Mickey's Italian Deli 101 Hermosa Ave 384 $1.00 25 North End Bar & Grill 2626 Hermosa Ave 849 $2.50 26 Oakberry Acai 25 Pier Ave 50 $2.50 27 Paisano's Pizza 1132 Hermosa Ave 456 $2.50 28 Palmilla 37 & 39 Pier Ave 812 Special rate 29 Patrick Molloy's 50A Pier Ave 823 $6.00 30 Pedone's Pizza 1332 Hermosa Ave 372 $2.50 31 Pier Surf 21 Pier Ave 180 $2.50 32 Proudly Serving 110 2nd Street 63 $1.00 33 Playa Hermosa Fish & Oyster Co. 19 Pier Ave 572 $4.00 34 Pabelas Grill 20 Pier Ave 390 $4.00 35 Sosta 439 Pier Ave 72 $2.50 36 Spyder II Inc 65 & 59 Pier Ave 200 $2.50 37 Tacos El Goloso 118 Pier Ave 91 $2.50 38 The Beach House 1300 The Strand 570 $2.00 39 The Bottle Inn 26 22nd St 416 $2.50 40 The Green Store 2151 Hermosa Ave 312 $1.00 41 The Lighthouse 30 Pier Ave 678 $6.00 42 The Rockefeller 422 Pier Ave 301 $2.50 43 The Source Cafe 509 Pier Ave 620 $1.00 44 Treasure Chest 50 Pier Ave 156 $2.50 45 Uncorked 302 Pier Ave 360 $2.50 46 Waterman's 22 Pier Ave 625 Special rate 47 Waves 29 Pier Ave 247 $2.50 48 Zane's Resturaunt 1150 Hermosa Ave 558 $2.50 Commercial Encroachment Fee Log Page 205 of 1002 Page 1 of 5 RES-26-XXXX CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESOLUTION NO. 26-XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE FEE SCHEDULE FOR COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) owns and manages public rights-of-way and municipal property (“Property”) and possesses authority to regulate, permit, and monetize use of such Property pursuant to its police power under the California Constitution (Section 7 to Article XI) and Government Code section 37350; and WHEREAS, the City is located within the California coastal zone and is subject to the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Public Resources Code section 30000 et seq.)(“Coastal Act”), which requires that development and use of coastal resources be balanced with protection of public access and coastal resources; and WHEREAS, certain encroachments onto City Property may be subject to coastal development permit requirements and related conditions to mitigate impacts on public access and coastal resources; and WHEREAS, the City has long supported outdoor dining and retail encroachments to promote economic vitality and activation of commercial areas; and WHEREAS, the City may impose fees for private use of City Property so long as such fees serve a legitimate public purpose and are rationally related to governmental interests including cost recovery, equitable allocation of public resources, and economic regulation; and WHEREAS, any fee imposed in connection with a permit or condition of approval must satisfy constitutional requirements under the Takings Clause of the United States Constitution (including the “essential nexus” and “rough proportionality” standards established in applicable case law); and Page 206 of 1002 Page 2 of 5 RES-26-XXXX WHEREAS, fees for encroachments on City Property are imposed as a condition of voluntary use of public land and are intended to compensate the public for private occupation and to address impacts to public infrastructure, access, and administrative resources; and WHEREAS, the City Council (“Council”) adopted Resolution No. 23-7379 dated June 13, 2023, establishing a tiered fee structure based on factors including location value, intensity of use, administrative costs, and impacts to public infrastructure; and WHEREAS, the Council directed staff to evaluate adjustments to encroachment fees including creation of a reduced-fee category for lower- intensity uses on January 13, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the unique characteristics of certain off–Pier Plaza businesses that do not provide table service or alcohol service, and therefore impose lesser impacts on public infrastructure and administrative resources; and WHEREAS, the Council considered the zoning of such encroachments at the April 28, 2026 meeting, and determined that encroachments located in residential zones should be exempt from this fee; and WHEREAS, the Council now desires to create a new encroachment category and fee; and make the fee retroactive to January 1, 2026. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. Amendment. The Council hereby amends the City’s Master Fee Schedule to establish the following encroachment fee category: Page 207 of 1002 Page 3 of 5 RES-26-XXXX Encroachment Area Category Proposed Fee per square foot, per month Off Pier Plaza businesses conducting retail food sales without table service and without alcohol service located in commercial zones $1.00 Notwithstanding the foregoing, encroachments located within residential zoning districts shall be exempt from the fees established by this Resolution. SECTION 3. Coastal Act and Constitutional Findings. The Council hereby finds and declares the following: a. Essential Nexus. There is an essential nexus between the encroachment fee and legitimate governmental interests including compensation for private use of public property, protection of public access within the coastal zone, and mitigation of impacts to public infrastructure and pedestrian circulation. b. Rough Proportionality. The amount of the fee is roughly proportional to the intensity and character of the encroachment use taking into account location, operational characteristics, and level of impact on public resources and City services. c. Coastal Act Consistency. The fee structure is consistent with the Coastal Act because it supports orderly management of public rights-of- way, protects public access, and ensures that private use of coastal public land does not occur without appropriate compensation or regulation. d. Voluntary Use of City Property. The fee applies only to voluntary encroachments onto City Property, and is therefore a lawful charge for use of public land rather than an unconstitutional exaction. e. No Unconstitutional Taking. The fee does not constitute an unconstitutional taking of private property because it satisfies the nexus and proportionality requirements, and is imposed in connection with discretionary approval of encroachments. f. Residential Zone Exemption. Encroachments located within residential zones (1) are of lower intensity; (2) generate fewer impacts to public access, infrastructure, and City services; and (3) require less administrative Page 208 of 1002 Page 4 of 5 RES-26-XXXX oversight. The Council therefore finds that imposition of a fee in such locations would not be roughly proportional to the impacts of the encroachment. The exemption is necessary to ensure the fee structure remains constitutionally compliant and reasonably related to the impacts of use of public property. SECTION 4. Legislative Findings. The Council further finds that (a) the fee is a lawful exercise of the City’s police power and proprietary authority; (b) the fee is not a tax, but a charge for use of public property; (c) the classification created by this Resolution is rational and satisfies equal protection requirements; and (d) the exemption for residential zones is rationally based on legitimate governmental interests including proportionality of impacts, neighborhood compatibility, and support for lower-intensity community-serving uses. SECTION 5. California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The Council finds that this action is not a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15378(b)(4) and (5). The action results in the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Further, the action is an organization or administrative activity of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. SECTION 6. Severability. If any section or provision of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Resolution shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation. SECTION 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City; and make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council in the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Resolution is effective immediately upon adoption. Page 209 of 1002 Page 5 of 5 RES-26-XXXX PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this 12th day of May 2026. ______________________________________________________________________________ Mayor Mike Detoy PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________________ ________________________________ Martha Alvarez Jason Baltimore City Clerk Interim City Attorney Page 210 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 9 Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-AS-053 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FROM A FEE STUDY UPDATE (Continued from the April 28, 2026, City Council Meeting) (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Conduct a public hearing to consider adoption of remaining fee updates included in the recent Fee Study update; and 2. Adopt Resolution 26-XXX setting fees based on the recent Fee Study update (Attachment 1). Executive Summary: The City recently updated its fee study, originally set in 2016 with partial cost recovery, to address rising service costs, reduce growing General Fund subsidies, and improve cost alignment (potentially generating ~$1.0M annually). At the April 28, 2026, meeting, City Council held a public hearing, approved all staff recommendations except 19 fees to be phased in over two years, and directed staff to return to review those remaining fees in more detail. Past Board, Commission, and City Council Actions Meeting Date Description 2011 City Council held User Fee Study workshops on February 17, 2011 and March 29, 2011; conducted a public hearing on April 26, 2011; reviewed fee summaries on May 10, 2011; directed preparation of a resolution on May 26, 2011; and continued the item to June 14, 2011, for adoption. September 19, 2016 User Fee Study Session-City Council reviewed the 2016 Fee Study Update and provided direction to staff regarding implementation of fees September 27, 2016 City Council approved a fee resolution, establishing a standardized cost-recovery framework with phased fee adjustments, maintaining some fees below full cost to balance affordability and economic activity; effective December 1, 2016. Page 211 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 9 Meeting Date Description April 28, 2026 City Council held a public hearing on proposed new fees a nd approved all except 19, which will be increased over two years per staff recommendations; staff were directed to return to City Council to review those 19 fees. Analysis: Planning/Building and Public Works fees remain below full cost recovery, about 63% and 78%, respectively resulting in ongoing General Fund subsidies exceeding $1M and $200K. Fees were calculated based on current processes and associated staff time to more accurately reflect the true cost of service delivery. Cost increases are largely driven by higher personnel and benefit costs, increased overhead, greater coordination across departments, expanded regulatory requirements, and the need for consultant support, factors that have significantly increased the true cost of providing services since the last comprehensive update. The updated fee study modernizes and recalibrates these fees to better align with actual costs, reduce subsidies, and improve long-term fiscal sustainability. Staff is also currently reviewing and refining internal processes and may return with future fee adjustments as efficiencies are identified. The City Council’s April 28 action approving most fee updates represents meaningful progress toward full cost recovery; however, 19 fees were isolated by City Council for further discussion, and decisions on these will determine whether subsidies are reduced or continue to place pressure on the General Fund. All proposed fee updates are included in Attachment 3. Fee No. Title Key Feedback Development Services S-001 Conditional Use Permit – Comm/Other Limit increase (~$2K); revisit with upcoming streamlined zoning/process updates; develop tiered fees based on project complexity; evaluate revised cost under new process S-003 CUP/PDP – Condo Tie fee to streamlined process updates; reduce fees for small/admin projects (≤2 units); reassess once zoning changes are implemented; support staff rec S-003B CUP Annual Monitoring Clarify purpose, scope, and implementation; consider eliminating or charging based strictly on actual staff time/cost Page 212 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 9 Fee No. Title Key Feedback S-004A Coastal Approval In-Concept Maintain current fee for now; revisit after zoning/process updates; establish tiered structure (minor/standard/complex); consider subsidizing mixed-use projects; support staff rec S-005 Text Amendment Agree with staff; waive hourly rates/costs for minor clarifications or outdated wording corrections approved by director. S-006 Zone Change Utilize deposit-based model at 80% allocated rates; allow refunds if actual staff time is lower than estimated S-007 Variance Increase modestly; revisit after streamlined process implementation; provide timing for future adjustment; support staff rec S-008 Sign Variance Minimal or no increase; consider converting to ministerial (staff-level) review to reduce cost and processing time S-009 Parking Plan Create tiered structure based on complexity; consider phased increases over time; revisit following process improvements S-013 Final Map Phase in increases; create reduced fee tier for projects already subject to County review/approvals; support staff rec S-017 Mural Review Keep fees low; shift to administrative approval to reduce staff time and cost; revisit after process changes S-018 Temporary Use Permit Reevaluate due to recently streamlined process; reduce fees, especially for repeat annual events; create discounted category for repeat applicants; revise date change fee. Fee too high for streamlined process; consider $1,000. Add reduced fee ($500) for repeat annual events. Revise date change fee to $200. Page 213 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 9 S-018A M-1 Zone Limited Events Permit Generally aligned with staff recommendation; consider slight reduction (~$800 level) Fee No. Title Key Feedback S-024 Planning Commission Interpretation Ensure fee reflects actual staff time; allow refunds if less time is used; some preference for no increase ; support staff rec S-030 Planning Sign Permit Generally supported; some preference for minimal or no increase; consider ministerial processing S-030A Planning A- Frame Sign Permit Maintain structure; reduce annual renewal fee (suggested ~$50); maintain enforcement and control mechanisms S-033 Admin Use Permit Clarify difference from S-018 and confirm S-003 applies to special use permits; keep staff recommendation. S-034 Admin Permit – Abandon CUP Align fee with actual staff time; allow refunds if time required is less than estimated S-040 Appeal to the City Council Generally supported; some input suggests moderate increase (~$1,000); maintain cost recovery for noticing/administration S-050 Historic Resource Review Lower fees for nominating and applying for major historical sources to encourage community-benefiting activity, while increasing fees for withdrawals and historical resource determinations. Keep consistent fees across categories; consider raising removal fee and lowering others to encourage landmark determinations. Public Works S-080 Residential Encroachment Permit Clarify applicability, purpose, and scope; some support no increase; some input suggests consideration of annual fee. S-081B Food Truck Permit Eliminate. Page 214 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 9 New food truck permit should be separately reviewed/approved by City Council; consider much higher fee or prohibit until approved. S-081C A-Frame Encroachment Permit Clarify overlap with Planning A-Frame permit; evaluate need and potential duplication; some support no increase or policy refinement Fee No. Title Key Feedback S-084G Sidewalk Vending Permit Eliminate Pier Plaza as a permitted sidewalk vending location. Keep fees unchanged, as the permit’s benefits already outweigh the cost and involve use of public property. Raise sidewalk vending fee to $900/year; account for violations and event impacts. Consider eliminating Pier Plaza vending location. Staff Analysis Development Services Fees Overall, City Council comments generally support modest or phased fee increases tied to actual staff costs while emphasizing that future fee adjustments should be coordinated with ongoing zoning, permitting, and process streamlining efforts. Several comments recommend creating tiered fee structures based on project complexity, reducing or refunding fees where staff time is lower than anticipated, and providing reduced fees for streamlined, repeat, administrative, or lower-impact applications. Many of the requested adjustments are directly tied to broader Community Development review efforts currently underway, including zoning updates and process improvements expected to come before the Planning Commission and City Council over the next year. These anticipated workflow and procedural changes, including expanded administrative approvals, streamlined review processes, and reduced commission involvement for certain applications, may reduce staff processing time and allow future fees to be recalibrated to better reflect the revised level of effort and actual cost recovery. On May 26, 2026, staff will present changes to the administrative procedures of the Zoning Code to the City Council where the current review pathways will be identified and described. As the Zoning Code Update proceeds, staff will recommend adjustments to fees as approval pathways are modified. In practice, fees will be recommended for reduction in those instances where authority is delegated from the Planning Commission to staff, as this type of streamlining will eliminate the need to prepare cases for its consideration. Page 215 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 6 of 9 The following fees from the table above are related to procedures recommended for streamlining by staff and the Planning Commission: S-003 CUP/PDP Condo S-018 Temporary Use Permit S-018A M-1 Zone Limited Events Permit S-024 Planning Commission Interpretation S-030 Planning Sign Permit S-030A Planning A Frame Sign Permit S-033 Administrative Use Permit Zoning Code provisions related to Commercial uses and development will be addressed in the coming fiscal year. The following fees are related to procedures that may be revised through this update: S-001 CUP – Comm/Other S-003B CUP Annual Monitoring 2-034 Admin Permit – Abandon CUP Staff recommend a postponement of fee increases on these activities. Public Works Fees The proposed Public Works fee increases are intended to better recover the actual staff time, permit processing, inspections, coordination, and administrative review required under the City’s current code and permitting processes. Alternatively, City Council could direct staff to return with potential code, zoning, or process amendments that may reduce review requirements or alter permit procedures, which could warrant revisiting the proposed Public Works fees following additional legal and operational analysis. Residential encroachment permits (S-080) allow for a residential property to utilize the adjoining public right-of-way for their use and enjoyment, typically for landscape improvements. The revised fee was aligned to better capture staff time necessary to properly review and process the permit. Encroachment permits are subject to a one-time fee, for which the property owner takes on maintenance responsibility and liability for the improvements in the area, and are revocable. The requirements for an encroachment permit are detailed in Chapter 12.16 of the HBMC. Creating an annualized fee would require further legal analysis and modifications to the Code. The revised fee structure for sidewalk vending (S-081G) will allow staff to recover time associated with what can be a time-consuming review process depending on the number of locations being requested by a potential vendor. As proposed, the initial application would be per location since it takes time to verify each location and then once approved the final fee is for the actual permit. Should City Council desire to further prohibit locations Page 216 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 7 of 9 for sidewalk vending, such as Pier Plaza, that will require further legal analysis and modification to the HBMC. To date, the City has issued only one permit on Pier Plaza for an art vendor. Should the City Council wish to further restrict sidewalk vending locations, including areas such as Pier Plaza, additional legal analysis and amendments to the HBMC would likely be required. A-frames are covered under chapter 17 of the HBMC and are initiated through the Community Development Department as they may be located in either private or public property. Business owners are first required to obtain a temporary sign permit through the Community Development Department. Once approved, Public Works may then issue an encroachment permit in accordance with Chapter 12.16 of the HBMC for placement of the sign within the public right-of-way at the approved location. The Public Works fees are associated with permit processing and inspection to ensure adequate path of travel at the location of the A Frame. Modifications to the process may require changes to the HBMC. Section 10.32.180 of the HBMC prohibits food trucks (vendor vehicles) from designated locations on City streets, unless approved by City Council. The proposed fee for S -081B intends to capture the staff time that would be required to evaluate any potential request(s) and bring the item forward to City Council for consideration. For reference, Public Works has not received any recent requests for food trucks; therefore, the fee could be eliminated but would result in a loss of staff time cost recovery should the City receive a future request(s). Options for City Council Consideration: Option 1: Adopt Full Cost Recovery Fees (Staff Recommended): Adopt the proposed fee increases now to allow full cost recovery, and direct staff to come back with reduced fee adjustments as new code changes and efficiencies come online. Align fees with the full cost of service Reduce General Fund subsidies Direct staff to complete process review and identify efficiencies Return to City Council with recalibrated fees once processes are refined Allows for fiscal sustainability while maintaining flexibility for future adjustments Option 2: Adopt Partial Cost Recovery Maintain subsidies for selected services Provide direction on policy-based subsidies Option 3: Maintain Current Fees Continue existing subsidy levels Increase pressure on the General Fund and future budgets Option 4: Defer Certain Fee Increases with Future Recalibration Page 217 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 8 of 9 Adopt proposed fees now based on current processes and staff time EXCEPT for the following fees: o S-003 CUP/PDP Condo o S-018 Temporary Use Permit o S-018A M-1 Zone Limited Events Permit o S-024 Planning Commission Interpretation o S-030 Planning Sign Permit o S-030A Planning A Frame Sign Permit o S-033 Administrative Use Permit o S-001 CUP – Comm/Other o S-003B CUP Annual Monitoring o 2-034 Admin Permit – Abandon CUP Direct staff to complete process review and identify efficiencies Return to City Council with recalibrated fees once processes are refined Allows for near-term revenue improvement while maintaining flexibility for future adjustments. Fiscal Impact: The City Council’s action at the April 28 meeting to approve the majority of fee updates represents significant progress toward achieving full cost recovery and reducing reliance on General Fund subsidies. Adoption of the proposed fee update would be effective July 1, 2026, and was estimated to generate up to $1.0 million in additional annual revenue if implemented at full cost recovery levels. The fees were adopted to be fully implemented in two years. Fees will be updated annually based on the Los Angeles-area Consumer Price Index (CPI) from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Actual revenue impacts will depend on: City Council direction regarding cost recovery levels; Service demand and fee elasticity; and Market considerations for certain services. If the City Council ultimately approves the remaining above fees under consideration at full cost recovery levels, the City will further reduce General Fund service cost subsidies and improve the City’s long-term fiscal sustainability. If the City Council does not approve increases for these fees, those service cost will continue to be subsidized by the General Fund, contributing to ongoing structural budget challenges identified in the FY 27 Fiscal Outlook presentation. Attachments: 1. Draft Fee Resolution 2. Proposed Fee Changes Page 218 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 9 of 9 3. Fee Study Update 4. Current Master Fee and Charges Schedule Respectfully Submitted by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Concur: Alison Becker, Community Development Director Concur: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 219 of 1002 Page 1 of 3 RES-26-XXXX CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESOLUTION NO. RES-26-XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AND AMENDING THE CITY’S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE TO IMPLEMENT FEES IDENTIFIED IN THE FEE STUDY UPDATE AND FINDING THE ACTION EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) is authorized to establish and collect fees for municipal services pursuant to the California Constitution (Section 7 to Article XI and Section 1(e)(2) to Article XIIIC) and California Government Code Sections 66014, 66016, and 66018; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council to recover costs reasonably borne in providing City services pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2.64.010; and WHEREAS, Revenue & Cost Specialists has completed a comprehensive Fee Study Update dated [______] (“Fee Study”) evaluating the full cost of providing services, including personnel, materials, and overhead costs; and WHEREAS, the Fee Study demonstrates that many existing fees do not fully recover the cost of services, resulting in subsidies from the general fund; and WHEREAS, the City has made available data regarding the cost or estimated cost of providing services for the fees at least ten (10) days before the public meeting held on April 28, 2026, pursuant to the California Government Code Sections 66016 and 66018; and WHEREAS, the fees established herein are intended to recover, and do not exceed, the City’s reasonable costs of providing the services to which the fees relate; and WHEREAS, there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of each fee and the cost of the governmental service provided to the payor, and the fees do not constitute a tax under the California Constitution (Article XIIIC); and Page 220 of 1002 Page 2 of 3 RES-26-XXXX WHEREAS, the Council desires to amend the City’s Master Fee Schedule to incorporate the updated fees identified in the Fee Study. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. Amendment. The City’s Master Fee Schedule as set forth in Exhibit A (attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference) is hereby amended and adopted to incorporate the updated fees identified in the Fee Study. Said fees shall be applied by the various City departments and collected by the City for the services identified therein. a. Application of Fees. All fees set forth in the Master Fee Schedule shall apply to each identified process or service. Additional fees shall be required for each additional process or service requested or required. Where fees are based on units of measurement, such fees shall apply to each unit or portion thereof. b. Interpretation. In the event of a conflict between two applicable fees in the Master Fee Schedule, the lower fee shall apply as determined by the City Manager. c. Periodic Review. The City Council shall periodically review the fees and charges contained in the Master Fee Schedule to ensure alignment with the cost of service and policy objectives. d. Annual Adjustments. All fees and charges set forth in the Master Fee Schedule shall be administratively adjusted annually on December 1 of each year, commencing December 1, 2026; based on the percent change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the year ending the preceding September. SECTION 3. Findings. The City Council finds that the fees set forth in the Master Fee Schedule do not exceed the reasonable costs to the City of providing the respective services, as demonstrated in the Fee Study. Page 221 of 1002 Page 3 of 3 RES-26-XXXX SECTION 4. California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The City Council finds that this Resolution is statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines as it is an organization or administrative activity of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. SECTION 5. Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications; and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable. SECTION 6. Certification. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution; cause it to be entered into the City’s book of original Resolutions; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within fifteen (15) days after the Resolution’s passage and adoption, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect July 1, 2026. The fees established in the Master Fee Schedule shall become operative on that date and shall satisfy the requirements of California Government Code Section 66017. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 12th day of May 2026. Mayor Michael Detoy PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ ________________________________ Martha Alvarez Jason Baltimore City Clerk Interim City Attorney Page 222 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHFEE COMPARISONCurrent Suggested % $ Increase/REF #SERVICE DescriptionCURRENT FEE SUGGESTED FEEFee Fee Change(Decrease)DEVELOPMENT SERVICESS-001CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - COMM/OTHERReview of a proposed conditional use permit to establish a commercial or other use to determine conformance with City codes and standards, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment.$6,065 per application $12,800 per application$6,065 $12,800 111% $6,735S-003CUP/PDP - CONDOReview of a proposed conditional use permit and precise development plan for new condominium development for conformance with City codes and standards, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment.$6,299 per application plus $9,190 per application plus $6,299 $9,190 46% $2,891S-003#N/A$233 per unit over 2 units $590 per every 10 units over 2 units$233 $590 153% $357S‐003BCUP ANNUAL MONITORINGAnnual monitoring of the conditions of a Conditional Use Permit to ensure continued compliance with the conditions.None $570 per annual review$0 $570 0%$570S-004ACOASTAL APPROVAL IN-CONCEPTProcessing a approval in concept of a development in the Coastal Zone for compliance with appropriate codes and standards.Administrative Permit alone- $640 per application Administrative Permit with another application - $321Plus $4,776 if a hearing is required.Commercial - $660 per application New Single Family Residence - $700 per application Other Residential - $515 per applicationVaries based on application typeVaries based on application type0% #VALUE!S-005TEXT AMENDMENTReview a request to amend the zoning code and/or other titles relating to land use development, including evaluation of internal code consistency and impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment.$7,078 per application$18,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs.$7,078 Deposit 0% #VALUE!S-006ZONE CHANGEReview a request to amend the zoning map, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment.$5,055 per application$18,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs.$5,055 $17,421 245% $12,366S-007VARIANCEReview a proposed variance from the regulations or standards in the zoning code or other titles relevant to land use development.$4,674 per application $9,985 per application$4,674 $9,985 114% $5,311S-008SIGN VARIANCEReview a proposed sign variance from the terms of the zoning code.$3,338 per application $7,980 per application$3,338 $7,980 139% $4,642S-009PARKING PLANReview of a proposed plan to provide adequate parking for a development for conformance with City codes and standards.$5,596 per applicationPlanning Review - $8,240 per application Other Department Review - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs.$5,596 $8,241 47% $2,645S-013FINAL MAPReview a final map for conformance with the Subdivision Map Act, tentative map, and City codes and standards.$875 per map $3,315 per map$875 $3,315 279% $2,440S-017MURAL REVIEWReview of a proposed mural for conformance with City codes and standards by the Planning Commission.$578 per application $3,010 per application$578 $3,010 421% $2,432S-018TEMPORARY USE PERMITReview of a proposed temporary use for conformance with City codes and standards and impacts on the surrounding area and city services, such as construction trailers and seasonal sales.$589 per applicationTemporary Seasonal Sales - $805 per application Temporary Minor Special Event - $1,900 per application Date Change - $335 per application$589Varies based on application type0% #VALUE!Fee Comparison Page 1 of 3Page 223 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHFEE COMPARISONCurrent Suggested % $ Increase/REF #SERVICE DescriptionCURRENT FEE SUGGESTED FEEFee Fee Change(Decrease)S-018AM-1 ZONE LIMITED EVENTS PERMITReview of a proposed Limited Event in the M-1 Zone for conformance with City codes and standards and impacts on the surrounding area and city services.$520 per application $1,100 per application$520 $1,100 112% $580S-024PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATIONRequest for an interpretation of a zoning code requirement by the Planning Commission.$1,857 per application $3,015 per application$1,857 $3,015 62% $1,158S-030PLANNING SIGN PERMITReview an individual sign application for conformance with City codes and standards.$795 per application $1,395 per application$795 $1,395 75% $600S-030APLANNING A-FRAME SIGN PERMITReview an individual A-Frame sign application for conformance with City codes and standards.New - $201 per application New - $250 per application$201 $250 24% $49S-030AAnnual Renewal - $121 per renewal Annual Renewal - $110 per renewal$121 $110 -9% ($11)S-033ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMITReview an administrative use permit for conformance with City codes and standards.$621 per application $2,100 per application$621 $2,100 238% $1,479S-033Temp Minor Special Event (Expedited 3 Day Review) - 200% x feeTemp Minor Special Event (Expedited 3 Day Review) - 200% x fee$0S-034ADMIN PERMIT - ABANDON CUPReview an administrative use permit for abandonment of an existing Conditional Use Permit for conformance with City codes and standards.$802 per application $1,740 per application$802 $1,740 117% $938S-040APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCILReview an appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission, or as otherwise specified by the code, to the City Council.$2,179 per appeal plus: Second Noticing: Residential 300' Radius - $301 Legal Ad - $201 Poster - $226 Total - $728 Non-Residential 500' Radius - $668 Legal Ad - $201 Poster - $226 Total - $1,095$5,170 per appeal plus actual noticing/advertising costs$2,179 $5,170 137% $2,991S-050HISTORIC RESOURCE REVIEWReview of a removal of historic designation or Certificate of Appropriateness issued by the City Council, or an administrative review of a Certificate of Appropriateness for conformance with City codes and standards.Minor Certification - $1,016Minor Certification - $1,880$1,016 $1,880 85% $864S-050Major Certification - $2,752 Major Certification - $4,005$2,752 $4,005 46% $1,253S-050Nomination - $3,152Nomination - $4,620$3,152 $4,620 47% $1,468S-050Removal - $5,244 Removal - $4,610$5,244 $4,610 -12% ($634)S-050Waiver of 90% of fees available (limited to 2 waivers per fiscal year)Waiver of 90% of fees available (limited to 2 waivers per fiscal year)Fee Comparison Page 2 of 3Page 224 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHFEE COMPARISONCurrent Suggested % $ Increase/REF #SERVICE DescriptionCURRENT FEE SUGGESTED FEEFee Fee Change(Decrease)PUBLIC WORKSS-080RESIDENTIAL ENCROACHMENT PERMITReview and inspection of a request for a residential permanent encroachment in the public right-of-way.$1,536 per permit $2,760 per permit$1,536 $2,760 80% $1,224S‐081BFOOD TRUCK PERMITReview and inspection of a request for the operation of a food truck in the public right‐of‐way, including City Council review.None Initial ‐ $3,635$0 $3,635 0% $3,635Annual Renewal ‐ $225$0 $225 0% $225S-081CA-FRAME ENCROACHMENT PERMITReview and inspection of a request for the placement of an A-Frame sign in the public right-of-way.$339 per permit $460 per permit$339 $460 36% $121S-084GSIDEWALK VENDING PERMITReview of a temporary sidewalk encroachment of a merchandise vendor for compliance with City codes and standards. $406 - Initial PermitPreliminary Application (Per Location) - $255Final Application (Per Location) - $255$406 $510 26% $104$406 - Annual Renewal Renewal - $335$406 $335 -17% ($71)Fee Comparison Page 3 of 3Page 225 of 1002 Fee Study Update for the City of Hermosa Beach Revenue & Cost Specialists 1519 East Chapman Ave, Suite C Fullerton, CA 92831 www.revenuecost.com (714)992-9020 Page 226 of 1002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY By acceptance of the Revenue & Cost Specialists (RCS) proposal, the City of Hermosa Beach decided to subject its fee-based services to detailed analysis dedicated toward seeking alternate, and more equitable, ways to finance City services provided to the community. Due to the various demands made of the City, it is essential that the City Council and management have complete information upon which to assess fees charged to the public for services provided. Schedule 1 at the end of this Executive Summary lists each service reviewed in this study. It indicates that the City could realize approximately $1,247,500 in additional new revenue if the recommendations provided here are adopted and implemented. Organization of Report. This Executive Summary explains RCS’s philosophy concerning fee- based services and cost analysis with a discussion of Costs Generally Defined. The report then lists the Types of Costs included in our analysis and our General Recommendations. COSTS GENERALLY DEFINED The basic costs of operating any business are direct labor and employee benefits, direct materials, and overhead costs. Determination of Costs. After the passage of Proposition 13, the California Taxpayers Association, the California Chamber of Commerce, the National Tax Limitation Committee and the California Association of Realtors put Proposition 4 before the voters. It was adopted by 74.3% of the voters of California on November 6, 1979, and became effective on July 1, 1980, retroactive to Fiscal Year 1978-79. This proposition, which became Article XIIIB of the State Constitution, addressed all city revenues and established a limit on the growth of tax revenues. Also, because of Proposition 4, fee services cannot exceed the “costs reasonably borne” by the City in providing the service. If the fee exceeds the cost, the excess fee is defined as a special tax, which Proposition 13 requires be approved by two-thirds of the voters. As Article XIIIB was written by the above business groups, it is not surprising that they recommended a business-oriented approach to the costs of governmental services. Principle Involved. A basic principle involved in this Report is the recognition of those full business costs as they are as defined by the authors of the Constitutional amendment, NOT just those costs which 1) the City might recognize and decide to budget; or 2) which it might decide to use in some other cost analysis methodology; or 3) that other jurisdictions not so complying might use; or 4) that some accounting or other consulting firm might decide it should use, based on some external, non-California legal requirements. 3Page 227 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach Fee Study Update These cost elements have been determined in a businesslike manner per basic business principles, and applied to each and every fee-financed or fee-financeable service provided by the City, modified only slightly to accommodate the published intent and definitions of the authors of Article XIIIB. Thus a logical, legal, and Constitutionally-mandated cost-consciousness can now be applied to City operations. TYPES OF COSTS The following costs, identified above as part of "costs reasonably borne" by the Authors of Proposition 4, make up the cost detail found on the right-hand page in Appendix B for each service center. Salaries and Wages City government is in fact a service industry, and therefore, it is natural that salaries make up the largest single element of cost for most services. Interview Process. In order to allocate the salaries, interviews were held, documents sought and researched, and reports and accounting records examined by RCS. The result was, in most cases, a percentage or hours distribution of individual employee personal services costs. One hundred percent of the time of all City employees was distributed. In other words, everyone had to be someplace, all of their time. No judgments were made about what personnel should or might be doing. Their time was distributed to those service centers where the time was expended. Employee Fringe Benefits Since fractional time -- to as low as three minutes per unit of service or one-twentieth of a percent of the annual time of an employee has been allocated to service centers, fringe benefit costs also must be fractionalized to carefully and accurately distribute those ancillary personnel costs. The City finances numerous benefits for its employees, thereby incurring measurable costs for these items, including: PERS Retirement Medical/Dental Benefits Medicare Insurance All of these costs are current operating expenses, and the amounts were isolated. Actual costs 4Page 228 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach Fee Study Update were determined and reduced to a percentage of salary for each of the positions. Available Work-Hours. After the individual elements of cost for positions was compiled, the total cost for each position was divided by the number of available work-hours. Available work hours were calculated as the total possible work-hours in a year, 2,080, less the following away- from-work benefit hours: Holidays (90 hours) Vacations (128 hours) Sick Leave – 50% Usage (48 hours) Morning/Afternoon Breaks (General – 45 hours) Start Up/Down Time (General – 91 hours) Using this approach the average number of available work-hours used was calculated as 1,678 hours per year for 40 hour a week positions and 2,480 hours per year for Fire shift positions. Maintenance and Operation Costs All maintenance and operation costs, including non-personnel expenses such as professional services, insurance, operating supplies etc., were derived from the 24-25 Council-approved budget and allocated via percentages or through actual allocation to each of the service centers identified in a department or division. General and Departmental Overhead Costs Overhead costs provide the vital glue that holds an organization together operationally and provide important coordinating capabilities. They also provide the day-to-day support services and facilities required for the organization to function effectively. RCS has used a detailed Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) to identify and allocate these costs to the remainder of the City organization. In the CAP, costs were allocated to end-user departments and divisions by applying an overhead allocation factor. Each factor was related to the work effort of its particular overhead element and was assessed for relevance and reasonableness. Full Cost Distribution. The purpose of deriving overhead costs to apportion these amounts to direct service program costs. By adopting this method the City will be aware of its true costs and be able to emulate business methods. Article XIIIB’s (Proposition 4 of 1979) authors intended this, defining as part of “costs reasonably borne” a calculated “reasonable allocation for overhead and administration.” General City Overhead. These services primarily set policy and support other departments without providing a deliverable service to the public. Where they do perform an end-user service, 5Page 229 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach Fee Study Update such costs have not been allocated to other departments. Costs in this general administration category include the following functions: Building Use Replacement. The replacement costs for City Hall, Community Center, City Yard, and Clark Building were calculated and depreciated over the standard 50 year life of a facility. These costs were then allocated to the departments and services that use these buildings and become part of their overhead costs. Departmental Administration. Costs in this category involve intra-departmental support functions, outside the above listed general City overhead functions, and involve the allocation of staff time within and among departmental functions. These services also do not provide end- user deliverables to the public, but instead provide vital administrative support within specific departments. City Council 2% City Clerk 5% City Manager 13% City Attorney 3%City Treasurer 0% Finance 13% Info Tech 7% HR 6% Insurance 26% Com Res Admin 3% Facility Maint 15% PW Admin 3% Fleet Maint 4% Other 15% General City Administrative Costs 6Page 230 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach Fee Study Update Fully Allocated Hourly Rates All of the above items make up the fully allocated hourly rate which is calculated for each position in the City. The makeup of each component of the City-wide average fully allocated hourly rate is detailed in the chart below. Calculation of Revenues. Many of the revenues included in this Report are calculated based on the current fee and the number of projected units of service. This may be different than the current budgeted revenues due to changes to projected volume, which comes from looking at historic volume and estimates of current year levels. Market Sensitive Fees. One of the notes in the following Summary Schedule 1 has a note called “Market Sensitive Fees.” This is associated with certain public safety fees, such as false alarms and loud party responses. The point of these fees is not necessarily to recover revenue, but instead to encourage a certain behavior, such as fixing your alarm or quieting your party. These fees are structured in a way that allows for a certain number of free responses before the fee is charged. Thus, if the fee is working correctly there will be no revenue at all. Therefore, we don’t project any new revenues for these services. Salaries 44% Benefits 23% Operating Expenses 11% City Overhead 12% Dept. Overhead 10% Fully Allocated Hourly Rate Components 7Page 231 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach Fee Study Update GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS Adoption of Modifications to Current Fee Structure It is recommended that the City Council adjust the fee schedule for the enumerated City services presented in Appendix A of this Report. Continued use of the "full business costing" concept will create consistency in the establishment of fees, and allow for timely adjustment to reflect changes in the cost of providing services. In addition, Recreation and Community Resources fees should be set by the market on an annual basis and should therefore not be included in the list of services that are increased annually by inflation. Review of Suggested Recovery Rates The City Council should review each service and the suggested recovery rate to determine how much of each service should be recovered through fees, and how much should be subsidized through the City’s tax dollars. This review is very important because it gives City staff direction as to what the Council wants to subsidize and what it does not. Comments about Specific Service Centers S-051: Building Plan Check/Inspection. RCS has worked with City staff to create a New Construction Fee Schedule that is based on square footage instead of valuation. While both methods are valid, it is felt that charging fees based on the type of occupancy and the size of the construction is more equitable for the types of construction seen in Hermosa Beach. These new fees are detailed in Appendix C of this Report. COMMUNITY RESOURCES By their nature, recreation services are highly market driven and subject to a variety of external factors including consumer demand, location, facility amenities, demographics, and competing service providers. Adjustments in fees can arguably have a significant impact on consumer demand given a variety of elasticity factors that may be in play. This does not imply that additional revenues are unavailable, but fee levels are best set at the delivery point based on a flexible and market based pricing model within policy goals. General Methodology Assumptions. The methodology generally used in developing service center revenue/cost calculations, as has been done in this study, is founded on key assumptions: 8Page 232 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach Fee Study Update First, service volumes are fairly constant and void of wide fluctuations in consumer patronage from year to year. Second, consumers have come to accept the economic value of continuing to use the identified service at a value that equates to the cost of providing the service. It is important to note that these two assumptions are not particularly valid for recreation and community resources activities that are characterized by annual changes in program popularity combined with the influence of seasonal conditions. Furthermore, recreation and community services dollars are highly sensitive to overall market and economic conditions, as a service that strives to compete for an elusive discretionary income dollar. Recreation and community resource fees are influenced by two factors generally not a factor in the delivery of other City services - marketing and social policy. Social Policy. City Council should develop a conscious policy as to what programs and service centers should be subsidized with tax monies in promoting social benefit, and to what extent. It may well be that some level of subsidy for many of the services identified in this group is not only necessary, but appropriate. Marketing. Given that these services are highly market sensitive and financed mostly by discretionary income, a special burden is placed on program managers to innovate and promote attendance. Those who run these programs know too well the need to convince customers of the value-added features of their services. If fees are set too high, attendance and consequently revenues will drop. On the other hand, establishing fee levels artificially low will result in a flood of demand beyond resource capabilities. Pricing. If priced strictly at average cost, fee increases can result in reduced participation leading to additional reactionary price increases and further losses in patronage. As such, prices for leisure and cultural services must be set carefully. The potential number of target customers should be estimated as part of an aggressive program marketing those services at determined price levels. Some important considerations in setting pricing follow: Has a marketing study been performed? Have programs been selected for their popularity? 9Page 233 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach Fee Study Update Do City programs compete with offerings made by other agencies, organizations, or private businesses who can supply the program at less cost? Is there a less costly way for the City to supply the service? Has sufficient money been budgeted to advertise the program adequately and how is the number of participants affected by the level of advertising? What costs would NOT be incurred or REMAIN were the program not to be offered? What is the cost of adding one more participant; of opening one more section of the activity? Are participants polled for their reaction to the offering, the instructor, the facility, and for their ideas for possible programs and the amounts that they are willing to pay? Are some facilities more costly to operate than others? What are the costs of electricity, water, gas, janitorial, maintenance, telephone, vandalism, and the like for each facility? How do existing facilities compare to those provided by the competition in creating either a price advantage or disadvantage? Has the clientele of the activity been defined allowing the City to understand the social purpose in subsidizing the activity? A number of these issues have already been addressed by City staff in past studies and reports and are merely presented to illustrate the issues involved in operating such services. In determining what should be charged for services it ultimately is the responsibility of recreation professionals to recommend a combination of decreased costs, increased participation and fee adjustments needed to meet the degree of recovery that is ultimately determined by the City Council. For programs to be relevant and responsive to customers, they need to be flexible with their resources. Detail of Recreation Services in Appendix D. The total costs of Recreation services are broken out to its component parts in Appendix D. Previously the City Council approved cost recovery goals for these services, and they are identified as Approved Direct Cost Recovery. For the most part, these are percentages of direct costs, which are direct part time salaries and benefits and direct operating expenses. These goals are set as a percentage of these direct costs because it is easier to measure the cost recovery from year to year. Also included are updated cost recovery goals based on current cost recovery rates. 10Page 234 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach Fee Study Update The City Council should now review these cost recovery goals to ensure that they are realistic goals while taking into account the market and social issues detailed above. All Things To All People While the City is deciding who to subsidize and what to finance, it should remember it cannot provide all things to all people. It should therefore prioritize what it hopes to accomplish. If the Council decides to provide more subsidies today, it is doing so at the expense of other services which can only be financed by tax dollars, such as Police Patrol services, Fire/Medical Aid services, Street Maintenance, and other public services. Therefore the Council must decide which direction it wants to proceed in, fully aware of the consequences of either action. CONCLUSION If all the recommendations and suggestions made in this Report are adopted, the City's financial picture would be improved. Also, far more equity between taxpayers and fee-payers, as well as fairness between property-related and non-property-related services could be secured, assisting in the City's continued financial stability into the future. The following Schedule 1 portrays the various services assessed during our analysis. Appendix A – Summary of Current and Proposed Fees Appendix A includes a summary of the current City fees matched up with the proposed fees for each service presented. Appendix B - Detailed Worksheets The substance of RCS’s work effort on this project is primarily comprised of two different worksheets shown in the detail of this report (see Appendix B). The first, "Revenue and Cost Summary Worksheet" is on the left hand side. These worksheets include a description of the service, the current fee structure, the recommended recovery rate, and other pertinent information. Also included are the revenue and cost comparisons and suggestions for fee modifications. 11Page 235 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach Fee Study Update Presented on the facing page, titled "Cost Detail Worksheet", is the worksheet which details the costs involved with each service. This page identifies those employees providing the service, the time spent, and their related costs. Appendix C – Detail of Building & Safety Fees Appendix D – Detail of Recreation Services The total costs of Recreation services are broken out to its component parts in Appendix C. Previously the City Council approved cost recovery goals for these services, and they are identified as Approved Direct Cost Recovery. For the most part, these are percentages of direct costs, which are direct part time salaries and benefits and direct operating expenses. These goals are set as a percentage of these direct costs because it is easier to measure the cost recovery from year to year. 12Page 236 of 1002 SCHEDULE 1SUMMARY OF REVENUES, COSTS, AND SUBSIDIESFY 2024-2025TOTAL TOTAL TOTALPOSSIBLEFEE SERVICE PROFIT/NEWREF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGESTREVENUE(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)(8)S-001CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - COMM/OTHER$30,325$63,990($33,665)47.4%100%$33,700S-002CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - FENCE/WALL$2,624$2,985($361)87.9%100%$0(a)S-002ACUP - WIRELESS COMM. FACILITY$6,065$9,629($3,564)63.0%100%$0(a)S-003CUP/PDP - CONDO$38,027$55,712($17,685)68.3%100%$17,700S-003AMINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-003BCUP ANNUAL MONITORING$0$6,818($6,818)0.0%100%$6,800S-004PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN$51,042$67,137($16,095)76.0%100%$16,100S-004ACOASTAL APPROVAL IN-CONCEPT$4,325$5,486($1,161)78.8%100%$1,200S-005TEXT AMENDMENT$7,078$18,043($10,965)39.2%100%$0(b)S-006ZONE CHANGE$5,055$17,420($12,365)29.0%100%$0(b)S-007VARIANCE$4,674$9,983($5,309)46.8%100%$0(a)S-008SIGN VARIANCE$3,338$7,981($4,643)41.8%100%$0(a)S-009PARKING PLAN$11,192$16,480($5,288)67.9%100%$5,300S-010AMENDMENT TO PLANNING ENTITLEMENT$10,686$19,114($8,428)55.9%100%$8,400S-011TIME EXTENSION$2,458$2,851($393)86.2%100%$0(a)S-012TENTATIVE MAP$17,508$26,983($9,475)64.9%100%$9,500S-012ASB9 TENTATIVE MAP$5,836$4,723$1,113123.6%100%$0(a)S-013FINAL MAP$3,500$13,259($9,759)26.4%100%$9,800S-014LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT$4,159$6,919($2,760)60.1%100%$0(a)S-015GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - TEXT$6,466$15,040($8,574)43.0%100%$0(b)S-016GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - MAP$4,804$11,790($6,986)40.8%100%$0(b)S-017MURAL REVIEW$1,156$6,018($4,862)19.2%100%$4,900S-018TEMPORARY USE PERMIT$4,712$10,965($6,253)43.0%100%$6,300S-018AM-1 ZONE LIMITED EVENTS PERMIT$1,040$2,196($1,156)47.4%100%$1,200S-019SLOPE/GRADE HEIGHT DETERMINATION$7,054$6,680$374105.6%100%($400)S-020HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION$4,910$3,241$1,669151.5%100%$0(a)S-021LEGAL DETERMINATION$5,024$3,570$1,454140.7%100%$0(a)S-022UNUSUAL ARCHITECTURAL/BUILDING REV$3,039$2,561$478118.7%100%$0(a)S-023DETERMINATION OF SIMILAR USE$2,457$4,426($1,969)55.5%100%$0(a)S-024PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION$1,857$3,015($1,158)61.6%100%$0(a)S-025REQST FOR REASONABLE ACCOMODATION$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-026CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION$6,990$15,762($8,772)44.4%100%$8,800S-027INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION$4,240$5,997($1,757)70.7%100%$0(b)S-028RECIRCULATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION$2,630$1,969$661133.6%100%$0(b)S-029ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REVIEW$0$0$00.0%100%$0(b)S-030PLANNING SIGN PERMIT$795$1,395($600)57.0%100%$600S-030APLANNING A-FRAME SIGN PERMIT$724$1,362($638)53.2%100%$600CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHPCT. RECOVERYFROM FEES13Page 237 of 1002 SCHEDULE 1SUMMARY OF REVENUES, COSTS, AND SUBSIDIESFY 2024-2025TOTAL TOTAL TOTALPOSSIBLEFEE SERVICE PROFIT/NEWREF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGESTREVENUE(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)(8)CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHPCT. RECOVERYFROM FEESS-031MASTER SIGN PROGRAM$822$771$51106.6%100%$0(a)S-032TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT$424$410$14103.4%100%$0S-032AMINOR PLANNING SIGN REVIEW$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-033ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT$621$2,102($1,481)29.5%100%$0(a)S-034ADMIN PERMIT - ABANDON CUP$802$1,740($938)46.1%100%$0(a)S-034AADMIN PERMIT-SHORT TERM VAC. RENTAL$4,200$1,318$2,882318.7%100%($2,900)S-035DEED RESTRICTION/COVENANT REVIEW$15,390$14,522$868106.0%100%$0S-036DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT$0$0$00.0%100%$0(b)S-037LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW$7,360$7,486($126)98.3%100%$100S-038PLNG LANDSCAPE DOC PACKAGE REV$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-039APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION$3,180$2,957$223107.5%100%$0(a)S-040APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL$2,179$5,172($2,993)42.1%100%$0(a)S-041PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW$2,254$20,122($17,868)11.2%100%$17,900S-041ASB35 PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW$161$1,782($1,621)9.0%100%$0(a)S-042EXTRA MEETING$782$741$41105.5%100%$0(a)S-043SPECIAL COMMUNITY MEETING$1,617$2,897($1,280)55.8%100%$0(a)S-044TRAFFIC/SPECIAL STUDY REVIEW$0$0$00.0%100%$0(b)S-045EXTRA PLAN REVIEW$0$0$00.0%100%$0(b)S-046ZONING LETTER$240$557($317)43.1%100%$0(a)S-047NEW/MODIFIED BUSINESS ZONING REVIEW$9,796$16,313($6,517)60.1%100%$6,500S-048PUBLIC NOTICING$36,990$33,753$3,237109.6%100%$0S-049GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE$49,000$197,262($148,262)24.8%100%$148,300S-049ARECORDS TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM$90,000$112,216($22,216)80.2%100%$22,200S-050HISTORIC RESOURCE REVIEW$12,164$15,119($2,955)80.5%100%$0(a)S-051BUILDING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION$1,205,264$1,836,031($630,767)65.7%100%$630,800S-052SOLAR PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION$39,984$37,895$2,089105.5%100%$0S-057BUILDING ADDRESS CHANGE$3,612$2,353$1,259153.5%100%($1,300)S-084JLIMITED LIVE ENTERTAIN PERMIT FEE$297$348($51)85.3%100%$0(a)SUBTOTAL - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $1,752,929 $2,765,367 ($1,012,438) 63.4% $952,10014Page 238 of 1002 SCHEDULE 1SUMMARY OF REVENUES, COSTS, AND SUBSIDIESFY 2024-2025TOTAL TOTAL TOTALPOSSIBLEFEE SERVICE PROFIT/NEWREF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGESTREVENUE(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)(8)CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHPCT. RECOVERYFROM FEESS-061NPDES STORMWATER INSPECTIONS$37,506$37,245$261100.7%100%($300)S-062AUTO REPAIR - NPDES INSPECTION$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-063STORMWATER MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW$0$0$00.0%100%$0(b)S-064PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK$158,342$302,832($144,490)52.3%100%$144,500S-065STREET/ROW VACATION REVIEW$0$0$00.0%100%$0(b)S-066ENGINEERING STUDY/REPORT REVIEW$0$0$00.0%100%$0(b)S-067ASSESSMENT DIST FORMATION RESEARCH$0$0$00.0%100%$0(b)S-068PLAN SHEET REPRODUCTION$45$59($14)76.3%100%$0S-069NON-UTIL R-O-W IMPROVEMENT PERMIT$153,330$74,775$78,555205.1%100%($78,600)S-070UTILITY SERVICE PERMIT$195,750$266,436($70,686)73.5%100%$70,700S-071SEWER LATERAL INSTALLATION PERMIT$13,623$9,668$3,955140.9%100%($4,000)S-072SEWER CAP$3,220$4,009($789)80.3%100%$800S-073MATERIAL STORAGE DROP-OFF PERMIT$2,128$1,604$524132.7%100%($500)S-074STAGING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT$53,200$68,338($15,138)77.9%100%$15,100S-075CRANE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT$12,768$9,623$3,145132.7%100%($3,100)S-075AMOVING VAN RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT$39,900$8,888$31,012448.9%100%($31,000)S-076SCAFFOLDING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT$6,210$9,987($3,777)62.2%100%$3,800S-077TEMPORARY FENCE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT$4,522$4,716($194)95.9%100%$200S-078VALET PARKING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-079ROLL-OFF BIN RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT$6,545$7,238($693)90.4%100%$700S-080RESIDENTIAL ENCROACHMENT PERMIT$12,288$22,094($9,806)55.6%100%$9,800S-081TEMP OUTDOOR DINING/RETAIL ENCR PMT$4,849$5,154($305)94.1%100%$300S-081ADRIVEWAY PARKING PERMIT$170$69,135($68,965)0.3%100%$69,000S-081BFOOD TRUCK PERMIT$0$3,861($3,861)0.0%100%$3,900S-081CA-FRAME ENCROACHMENT PERMIT$1,695$2,300($605)73.7%100%$600S-081DAWNING ENCROACHMENT PERMIT$1,695$2,783($1,088)60.9%100%$1,100S-082NEWSRACK PERMIT$640$2,341($1,701)27.3%100%$1,700S-083WIDE/LONG LOAD PERMIT$100$779($679)12.8%100%$0(c)S-083ATEMPORARY NO PARKING SIGNS$0$0$00.0%100%$0S-084TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN REVIEW$2,565$1,558$1,007164.6%100%($1,000)S-084APUBLIC TREE REMOVAL REQUEST REVIEW$2,856$4,464($1,608)64.0%100%$1,600S-084BPUBLIC TREE INSTALLATION REVIEW$1,680$415$1,265404.8%100%($1,300)S-084CDISABLED PARKING SPACE INSTALLATION$2,938$2,188$750134.3%100%$0(a)S-084DPUBLIC BENCH DEDICATION$8,336$9,610($1,274)86.7%100%$1,300S-084EEXTRA PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION$0$0$00.0%100%$0(b)S-084FWIRELESS ENCROACHMENT PMT APPL$0$0$00.0%100%$0(b)S-084GSIDEWALK VENDING PERMIT$1,218$845$373144.1%100%($400)15Page 239 of 1002 SCHEDULE 1SUMMARY OF REVENUES, COSTS, AND SUBSIDIESFY 2024-2025TOTAL TOTAL TOTALPOSSIBLEFEE SERVICE PROFIT/NEWREF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGESTREVENUE(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)(8)CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHPCT. RECOVERYFROM FEESS-125ADAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY$0$0$00.0%100%$0S-134BANNER HANGING$4,005$3,344$661119.8%100%($700)S-139BCOMPOSTING/WORM BIN PROCESSING$0$0$00.0%100%$0SUBTOTAL - PUBLIC WORKS $732,124 $936,289 ($204,165) 78.2% $204,20016Page 240 of 1002 SCHEDULE 1SUMMARY OF REVENUES, COSTS, AND SUBSIDIESFY 2024-2025TOTAL TOTAL TOTALPOSSIBLEFEE SERVICE PROFIT/NEWREF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGESTREVENUE(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)(8)CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHPCT. RECOVERYFROM FEESS-085POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE$0$82,595($82,595)0.0%100%$0(e)S-086POLICE ALARM PERMIT$7,200$6,548$652110.0%100%$0S-087DUI COLLISION RESPONSE$4,082$48,810($44,728)8.4%100%$0(b)S-087ALOUD PARTY RESPONSE$0$14,488($14,488)0.0%100%$0(e)S-088VEHICLE IMPOUND RELEASE$137,000$162,540($25,540)84.3%100%$25,500S-090CITATION SIGN-OFF$0$23,800($23,800)0.0%100%$0S-091VEHICLE REPOSSESSION$300$847($547)35.4%100%$0(c)S-092BOOKING PROCESSING$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-093TAXICAB INSPECTION$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-094POLICE BUSINESS BACKGROUND CHECK$3,390$3,883($493)87.3%100%$500S-095CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT$2,500$37,603($35,103)6.7%100%$35,100S-096VERIFICATION/CLEARANCE FORM/LETTER$5,500$930$4,570591.4%100%($4,600)S-097AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT$10,350$7,523$2,827137.6%100%($2,800)S-098BLOCK PARTY PERMIT$5,412$4,777$635113.3%100%($600)S-100PRIVATE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT$4,610$5,004($394)92.1%100%$400S-100ADRONE/UNMANNED AIRCRAFT PERMIT$1,740$262$1,478664.1%100%($1,500)S-101POLICE REPORT REPRODUCTION$100$21,185($21,085)0.5%100%$0(c)S-102POLICE AUDIO/VIDEO/DVD COPY$450$3,210($2,760)14.0%100%$0(c)S-103POLICE PHOTO REPRODUCTION$270$964($694)28.0%100%$0(c)S-103AFINGERPRINTING ON REQUEST$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-104ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES$12,500$509,967($497,467)2.5%100%$0(e)S-105ANIMAL RELEASE REDEMPTION$1,260$2,771($1,511)45.5%100%$1,500S-106DECEASED ANIMAL PICK-UP$148$186($38)79.6%100%$0S-108PET HOME QUARANTINE REVIEW$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-108ANON-HOUSEHOLD PET ANIMAL PERMIT$276$730($454)37.8%100%$500S-109MULTIPLE DOG/CAT REVIEW$276$730($454)37.8%100%$500S-109AJAIL SERVICES$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-122AMBULANCE RESPONSE - BLS/ALS$666,668$417,686$248,982159.6%100%$0S-123ASPECIAL EVENT SECURITY$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-123BPOLICE WITNESS SERVICES$0$0$00.0%100%$0SUBTOTAL - PUBLIC SAFETY $864,032 $1,357,039 ($493,007) 63.7% $54,50017Page 241 of 1002 SCHEDULE 1SUMMARY OF REVENUES, COSTS, AND SUBSIDIESFY 2024-2025TOTAL TOTAL TOTALPOSSIBLEFEE SERVICE PROFIT/NEWREF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGESTREVENUE(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)(8)CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHPCT. RECOVERYFROM FEESS-120OPEN FIRE PERMIT$0$0$00.0%100%$0S-126AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM$114,000$304,181($190,181)37.5%100%$0(e)S-126ASUMMER CAMP PROGRAM$91,200$315,940($224,740)28.9%100%$0(e)S-127RECREATION CLASSES$700,000$846,246($146,246)82.7%100%$0(e)S-128SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT$60,000$405,896($345,896)14.8%100%$0(e)S-128ALONG-TERM SPEC EVENT AGREEMENT$0$8,784($8,784)0.0%100%$0(e)S-128BSPEC EVENT RESERVED PARKING STAGING$0$542($542)0.0%100%$0(e)S-128CSPECIAL EVENT PUBLIC HEARING$0$176($176)0.0%100%$0(e)S-128DSPECIAL EVENT MODIFICATION$0$527($527)0.0%100%$0(e)S-129EXCURSIONS$0$78,246($78,246)0.0%100%$0(e)S-130THEATER SERVICES$90,000$586,742($496,742)15.3%100%$0(e)S-131RECREATION FACILITY RENTALS$265,000$207,829$57,171127.5%100%$0(e)S-132BALLFIELD RENTALS$13,000$110,775($97,775)11.7%100%$0(e)S-133FILM PERMIT$35,000$28,635$6,365122.2%100%$0(e)SUBTOTAL - COMMUNITY RESOURCES $1,368,200 $2,894,519 ($1,526,319) 47.3% $018Page 242 of 1002 SCHEDULE 1SUMMARY OF REVENUES, COSTS, AND SUBSIDIESFY 2024-2025TOTAL TOTAL TOTALPOSSIBLEFEE SERVICE PROFIT/NEWREF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGESTREVENUE(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)(8)CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHPCT. RECOVERYFROM FEESS-084HTOBACCO RETAILER LICENSE RENEWAL$503$39$4641289.7%100%($500)S-104ADOG LICENSE DUPLICATE$18$12$6150.0%100%$0S-136PARKING PERMIT PROCESSING$325,000$360,940($35,940)90.0%100%$0S-138PARKING LOT MONTHLY PASS$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-139DAILY PARKING LOT PROCESSING$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-139AREFUSE LIEN PROCESSING$1,596$2,378($782)67.1%100%$800S-140GARAGE SALE PERMIT$112$108$4103.7%100%$0S-142NSF CHECK PROCESSING$1,891$1,960($69)96.5%100%$100S-143DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION$50$318($268)15.7%100%$0(c)S-143AELECTRONIC FILE COPY$5$3$2166.7%100%$0(c)S-144DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION$15$19($4)79.0%100%$0S-145APPEAL TO COUNCIL FROM PW STAFF$3,319$2,864$455115.9%100%$0(a)S-147INTITATIVE PROCESSING$200$1,510($1,310)13.3%100%$0(c)S-150NEW BUSINESS REGISTRATION PROCESS$13,354$18,054($4,700)74.0%100%$4,700S-151BUSINESS REGISTRATION RENEWAL$59,774$107,512($47,738)55.6%100%$47,700S-152BUSINESS LICENSE DUPLICATE$0$0$00.0%100%$0(d)S-153CREDIT CARD PROCESSING$106,052$90,000$16,052117.8%100%($16,100)S-154CANNABIS DELIVERY PERMIT$702$1,069($367)65.7%100%$0(a)SUBTOTAL - ADMINISTRATION $512,591 $586,786 ($74,195) 87.4% $36,700NOTES:(a) Insufficient data to determine financial impact(b) Deposit based service/fee(c) Fee restricted by Law(d) Delete fee from fee schedule(e) Market Sensitive fee19Page 243 of 1002 SCHEDULE 1SUMMARY OF REVENUES, COSTS, AND SUBSIDIESFY 2024-2025TOTAL TOTAL TOTALPOSSIBLEFEE SERVICE PROFIT/NEWREF # SERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGESTREVENUE(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)(8)CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHPCT. RECOVERYFROM FEESTOTAL TOTAL TOTAL POSSIBLEFEE SERVICE PROFIT/ NEWSERVICE REVENUE COST (SUBSIDY) ACTUAL SUGGEST REVENUECOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $1,752,929 $2,765,367 ($1,012,438) 63.4% VAR.$952,100PUBLIC WORKS$732,124 $936,289 ($204,165) 78.2% VAR.$204,200PUBLIC SAFETY$864,032 $1,357,039 ($493,007) 63.7% VAR.$54,500COMMUNITY RESOURCES $1,368,200 $2,894,519 ($1,526,319)47.3% VAR.$0ADMINISTRATION$512,591 $586,786 ($74,195) 87.4% VAR.$36,700ALL FEE SERVICES $5,229,876 $8,540,000 ($3,310,124) 61.2%$1,247,500PCT. RECOVERYFROM FEES20Page 244 of 1002 APPENDIX A SUMMARY OF CURRENT FEES AND PROPOSED FEES 21Page 245 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - COMM/OTHERREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $12,800 per application6,065 per application S-002 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - FENCE/WALLREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $2,985 per application$2,624 per application S-002A CUP - WIRELESS COMM. FACILITYREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $9,630 per application$6,065 per application S-003 CUP/PDP - CONDOREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $9,190 per application plus $590 per every 10 units over 2 units$6,299 per application plus $233 per unit over 2 units S-003A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed from the fee schedule.$2,641 per application S-003B CUP ANNUAL MONITORINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $570 per annual reviewNone April 16, 2025 1 22Page 246 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-004 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLANREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Commercial/Mixed Use - $9,125 per application Residential - $8,150 per application Commercial/Mixed Use - $6,624 per application Residential - $6,299 per application S-004A COASTAL APPROVAL IN-CONCEPTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Commercial - $660 per application New Single Family Residence - $700 per application Other Residential - $515 per application Administrative Permit alone - $640 per application Administrative Permit with another application - $321 Plus $4,776 if a hearing is required. S-005 TEXT AMENDMENTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $18,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. $7,078 per application S-006 ZONE CHANGEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $18,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. $5,055 per application S-007 VARIANCEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $9,985 per application$4,674 per application S-008 SIGN VARIANCEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $7,980 per application$3,338 per application April 16, 2025 2 23Page 247 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-009 PARKING PLANREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Planning Review - $8,240 per application Other Department Review - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. $5,596 per application S-010 AMENDMENT TO PLANNING ENTITLEMENTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE 75% of original application fee$5,343 per application S-011 TIME EXTENSIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Director - $1,075 per application Planning Commission - $1,775 per application $1,229 per application S-012 TENTATIVE MAPREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $8,995 per map$5,836 per map S-012A SB9 TENTATIVE MAPREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $4,725 per map$5,836 per map S-013 FINAL MAPREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $3,315 per map$875 per map April 16, 2025 3 24Page 248 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-014 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Applicant Requested - $4,430 per application Condition of Approval or Combining Lots - $2,490 per application Applicant Requested - $3,652 per application Condition of Approval or Combining Lots - $507 per application S-015 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - TEXTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $15,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. $6,466 per application or deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-016 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - MAPREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $12,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. $4,804 per application S-017 MURAL REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $3,010 per application$578 per application S-018 TEMPORARY USE PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Temporary Seasonal Sales - $805 per application Temporary Minor Special Event - $1,900 per application Date Change - $335 per application $589 per application S-018A M-1 ZONE LIMITED EVENTS PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1,100 per application$520 per application April 16, 2025 4 25Page 249 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-019 SLOPE/GRADE HEIGHT DETERMINATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $3,340 per application$3,527 per application S-020 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $3,240 per application$4,910 per application S-021 LEGAL DETERMINATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $3,570 per application$5,024 per application S-022 UNUSUAL ARCHITECTURAL/BUILDING REVREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $2,560 per application$3,039 per application S-023 DETERMINATION OF SIMILAR USEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $4,425 per application 50% of this fee would be credited towards future code text amendment fees related to the same project. $2,457 per application 50% of this fee would be credited towards future code text amendment fees related to the same project. S-024 PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $3,015 per application$1,857 per application April 16, 2025 5 26Page 250 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-025 REQST FOR REASONABLE ACCOMODATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the review is included in other applications. $1,116 per application S-026 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Class 32 - $935 per application plus deposit determined by staff for actual consultant charges Other - $510 per application $233 per application S-027 INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. $4,240 per application S-028 RECIRCULATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. $2,630 per application S-029 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-030 PLANNING SIGN PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1,395 per application$795 per application April 16, 2025 6 27Page 251 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-030A PLANNING A-FRAME SIGN PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE New - $250 per application Annual Renewal - $110 per renewal New - $201 per application Annual Renewal - $121 per renewal S-031 MASTER SIGN PROGRAMREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $770 per application$822 per application S-032 TEMPORARY SIGN PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $105 per application$106 per application S-032A MINOR PLANNING SIGN REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed from the fee schedule.$145 per application S-033 ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $2,100 per application Temp Minor Special Event (Expedited 3 Day Review) - 200% x fee $621 per application Temp Minor Special Event (Expedited 3 Day Review) - 200% x fee S-034 ADMIN PERMIT - ABANDON CUPREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1,740 per application$802 per application April 16, 2025 7 28Page 252 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-034A ADMIN PERMIT-SHORT TERM VAC. RENTALREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $660 per application$2,100 - Initial Permit $1,816 - Annual Renewal S-035 DEED RESTRICTION/COVENANT REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $832 per application$855 per application S-036 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-037 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Small - $360 per application Large - $700 per application Small - $368 per application S-038 PLNG LANDSCAPE DOC PACKAGE REVREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as it is now included in Landscape Plan Review (S-037). $689 per application S-039 APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $2,960 per appeal$3,180 per appeal April 16, 2025 8 29Page 253 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-040 APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCILREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $5,170 per appeal plus actual noticing/advertising costs$2,179 per appeal plus: Second Noticing: Residential 300' Radius - $301 Legal Ad - $201 Poster - $226 Total - $728 Non-Residential 500' Radius - $668 Legal Ad - $201 Poster - $226 Total - $1,095 S-041 PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Residential - $1,165 per review Residential with Other Departments - $1,695 per review Non-Residential - $1,275 per review Non-Residential with Other Departments - $2,430 per review 50% of this fee will credited against future Planning application fees if project is submitted within 6 months. $161 per meeting This fee will credited against future fees for a consistent project. S-041A SB35 PRE-APPLICATION REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1,780 per application 50% of this fee will credited against future Planning application fees if project is submitted within 6 months. $161 per meeting S-042 EXTRA MEETINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $761 per meeting$782 per meeting S-043 SPECIAL COMMUNITY MEETINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $2,895 per meeting$1,617 per meeting April 16, 2025 9 30Page 254 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-044 TRAFFIC/SPECIAL STUDY REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-045 EXTRA PLAN REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Actual charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Actual charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-046 ZONING LETTERREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $555 per letter$240 per letter S-047 NEW/MODIFIED BUSINESS ZONING REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $130 per business$79 per business S-048 PUBLIC NOTICINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE 300 foot radius: First Notice - $980 Second Notice - $293 500 foot radius: First Notice - $1,630 Second Notice - $650 Poster - $220 Enhanced Noticing/Outreach - Actual Costs Legal Ad (Easy Reader) - $187 300 foot radius: First Notice - $1,007 Second Notice - $301 500 foot radius: First Notice - $1,676 Second Notice - $668 Poster - $226 Enhanced Noticing/Outreach - Actual Costs Legal Ad (Easy Reader) - $192 April 16, 2025 10 31Page 255 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-049 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE 10% of Building Permit and Plan Check fees$3 per $1,000 building permit valuation This fee is applied to all residential and commercial construction with a valuation of $100,000 or more per site/project. S-049A RECORDS TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE 7% of all Building Permit and Plan Check fees, Planning fees, and Engineering Fees. 7% of all Building Permit and Plan Check fees, Planning fees, and Engineering Fees. S-050 HISTORIC RESOURCE REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Minor Certification - $1,880 Major Certification - $4,005 Nomination - $4,620 Removal - $4,610 Waiver of 90% of fees available (limited to 2 waivers per fiscal year) Minor Certification - $1,016 Major Certification - $2,752 Nomination - $3,152 Removal - $5,244 Waiver of 90% of fees available (limited to 2 waivers per fiscal year) S-051 BUILDING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE See Appendix CPermits - Various fees based on project valuation and construction counts Plan Check - 80% of Building Permit fee Expedited Plan Check - 150% of the standard plan check fee S-052 SOLAR PLAN CHECK/INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Residential Solar: 1-15kW: $450, with anything over 15kW an additional $15 per additional 1kW. Commercial Solar: 1-50kW: $701, with anything over 50kW an additional $7 per additional 1kW. Residential Solar: 1-15kW: $463, with anything over 15kW an additional $15 per additional 1kW. Commercial Solar: 1-50kW: $721, with anything over 50kW an additional $7 per additional 1kW. April 16, 2025 11 32Page 256 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-057 BUILDING ADDRESS CHANGEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $195 per address$301 per address S-061 NPDES STORMWATER INSPECTIONSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $265 per inspection$266 per inspection plus $42 per grease control device S-062 AUTO REPAIR - NPDES INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Remove this fee from the fee schedule as it is now included as part of NPDES Stormwater Inspections (S-061). $266 per inspection (2 inspections in 5 years) S-063 STORMWATER MITIGATION PLAN REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. $640 per application If contract services are used, charge the actual cost of the contract services. S-064 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Single Family Residence/Multi Family Residence (up to 4 units): $3,695 per plan Other - Deposit determined by staff (minimum of $4,000) with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Single Family Residence/Multi Family Residence/Commercial: $1,451 per plan plus $240 per each additional dwelling unit up to 4 units Multi Family Residential over 4 dwelling units/Other - Deposit determined by staff (minimum of $2,500) with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-065 STREET/ROW VACATION REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. April 16, 2025 12 33Page 257 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-066 ENGINEERING STUDY/REPORT REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Stop Sign or Traffic Review Resident Requests - No charge for the first review. For any review within two years of the last review charge full costs of the review. Speed Cushion Installation - No Charge Speed Cushion Removal - Actual Costs Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Stop Sign or Traffic Review Resident Requests - No charge for the first review. For any review within two years of the last review charge full costs of the review. Speed Cushion Installation - No Charge Speed Cushion Removal - Actual Costs S-067 ASSESSMENT DIST FORMATION RESEARCHREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-068 PLAN SHEET REPRODUCTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $59 per sheet for the first sheet plus $7 per each additional sheet or actual cost if using an outside copier $45 per sheet for the first sheet plus $5 per each additional sheet or actual cost if using an outside copier S-069 NON-UTIL R-O-W IMPROVEMENT PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $395 per permit per improvement type Improvement types are Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk, and/or Driveway, Paving, Cross Gutter, Curb Ramp $807 per permit S-070 UTILITY SERVICE PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE 0-25 linear feet - $970 25-100 linear feet - $1,525 100+ linear feet - $275 for each additional 150 linear feet Over 1,000 linear feet - Actual Costs Utility Infrastructure Work - Actual Costs 0-25 linear feet - $674 25-100 linear feet - $1,182 100+ linear feet - $240 for each additional 150 linear feet Over 1,000 linear feet - Actual Costs Utility Infrastructure Work - Actual Costs April 16, 2025 13 34Page 258 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-071 SEWER LATERAL INSTALLATION PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Basic Permit - $510 per permit Large Permit - Deposit determined by staff (minimum of $1,000) with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. $717 per permit S-072 SEWER CAPREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $200 per permit$161 per permit S-073 MATERIAL STORAGE DROP-OFF PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $200 per permit plus per day Parking Meter rates (for up to 40 linear feet) Permit is valid for one day $266 per permit Permit is valid for one day S-074 STAGING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $340 per permit plus per day Parking Meter rates (for up to 40 linear feet) Permit is valid for up to 14 days $266 per permit plus $17 per meter per day Permit is valid for one day S-075 CRANE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $200 per permit plus per day Parking Meter rates (for up to 40 linear feet) Plus associated traffic control review costs as needed Permit is valid for one day $266 per permit Permit is valid for one day April 16, 2025 14 35Page 259 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-075A MOVING VAN RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $60 per permit plus per day Parking Meter rates (for up to 40 linear feet) $266 per permit S-076 SCAFFOLDING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $555 per permit plus per day Parking Meter rates Permit is valid for 14 days $345 per permit, plus $26 per day after 14 days S-077 TEMPORARY FENCE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $275 per permit Permit is valid for 14 days $266 per permit plus $17 per day after 14 days S-078 VALET PARKING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed from the fee schedule.New/Annual - $226 per permit plus $18 per meter per day S-079 ROLL-OFF BIN RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $205 per permit plus per day Parking Meter rates (for up to 40 linear feet) Permit is valid for 14 days $187 per permit Permit is valid for 14 days S-080 RESIDENTIAL ENCROACHMENT PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $2,760 per permit$1,536 per permit April 16, 2025 15 36Page 260 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-081 TEMP OUTDOOR DINING/RETAIL ENCR PMTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Simple Off-Street - $505 per permit Standard Off-Street - $1,815 per permit On-Street - $2,115 per permit Annual Renewal - $365 per permit Minor Alteration - $355 per permit Third Party consultant review will be billed at cost if necessary. Outdoor Dining Encroachment: Standard Off-Street - $1,664 Simple Off-Street - $506 On-Street - $1,948 Annual Renewal - $409 Minor Alteration - $322 S-081A DRIVEWAY PARKING PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Initial - $485 Annual Renewal - $50 Driveway - $170 S-081B FOOD TRUCK PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Initial - $3,635 Annual Renewal - $225 None S-081C A-FRAME ENCROACHMENT PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $460 per permit$339 per permit S-081D AWNING ENCROACHMENT PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $555 per permit$339 per permit S-082 NEWSRACK PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE New - $450 per permit plus $95 per newsrack Annual - $360 per newsrack New - $421 per permit plus $54 per newsrack Annual - $33 per newsrack April 16, 2025 16 37Page 261 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-083 WIDE/LONG LOAD PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Single Trip - $16 Annual Permit - $90 Fees are set by the State Single Trip - $20 Annual Permit - $114 Fees are set by the State S-083A TEMPORARY NO PARKING SIGNSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $3 per 10 signsNone S-084 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Basic Plan - $310 per permit Large Plan - Deposit determined by staff (minimum of $1,000) with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. $513 per plan or actual costs as determined by City staff S-084A PUBLIC TREE REMOVAL REQUEST REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Up to 12 inch diameter - $205 per tree Over 12 inch diameter - $1,195 per tree Plus cost of Arborist Report $238 per tree S-084B PUBLIC TREE INSTALLATION REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $60 per tree$240 per tree April 16, 2025 17 38Page 262 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-084C DISABLED PARKING SPACE INSTALLATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Application - $1,775 Installation - $1,415 Waiver for those with a household income under $75,000. $2,938 per request, with a waiver for those with a household income under $75,000. S-084D PUBLIC BENCH DEDICATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Bench - $1,545 plus the cost of the bench, materials, and plaque Concrete Footing - $165 plus the cost of materials Plaque Replacement - $475 plus the cost of the plaque and materials Remains a Donation. Bench - $1,555 plus the cost of the bench, materials, and plaque Plaque Replacement - $561 plus the cost of the plaque and materials Remains a Donation. S-084E EXTRA PLAN CHECK/INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-084F WIRELESS ENCROACHMENT PMT APPLREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $2,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. $2,500 per application in the form of a deposit to be drawn down for actual hours spent reviewing and processing application. S-084G SIDEWALK VENDING PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Preliminary Application (Per Location) - $255 Final Application (Per Location) - $255 Renewal - $335 $406 - Initial Permit $406 - Annual Renewal S-084H TOBACCO RETAILER LICENSE RENEWALREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $40 per renewal$503 - Initial Application $428 - Annual Renewal April 16, 2025 18 39Page 263 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-084J LIMITED LIVE ENTERTAIN PERMIT FEEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $350 per permit$297 per permit S-085 POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE 3 free responses in a calendar year Each subsequent response: Burglary Alarm - $120 Robbery Alarm - $390 3 free responses in a calendar year Each subsequent response: Burglary Alarm - $118 Robbery Alarm - $333 S-086 POLICE ALARM PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE New/Annual - $23 per permitNew/Annual - $24 per permit S-087 DUI COLLISION RESPONSEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all emergency personnel responding, not to exceed $12,000 per incident by State law. Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all emergency personnel responding, not to exceed $12,000 per incident by State law. S-087A LOUD PARTY RESPONSEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE First Response - No Charge Each subsequent Response - Actual Cost First Response - No Charge Each subsequent Response - Actual Cost S-088 VEHICLE IMPOUND RELEASEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $325 per vehicle Bicycle, Scooter, and Other Wheeled Devices - $163 $274 per vehicle Bicycle, Scooter, and Other Wheeled Devices - $168 April 16, 2025 19 40Page 264 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-090 CITATION SIGN-OFFREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Resident - No Charge Non-Resident - $50 per citation Resident - No Charge Non-Resident - $60 per citation S-091 VEHICLE REPOSSESSIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $15 per vehicle This fee is set by the State $15 per vehicle This fee is set by the State S-092 BOOKING PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed from the fee schedule.$445 per booking S-093 TAXICAB INSPECTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed from the fee schedule.First Inspection - No Charge (part of franchise fee) Subsequent Inspection - $67 One Day Taxicab Franchise Fee - $44 Dial-A-Taxi Permit - No Charge S-094 POLICE BUSINESS BACKGROUND CHECKREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $390 per application plus any state fees$339 per application plus any state fees April 16, 2025 20 41Page 265 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-095 CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE New Application - $1,505 Renewal - $25 Amended - $10 Live Scan - $42 per scan plus DOJ fees Psychological testing costs are to be added to the above fees State background check fees are to be added to the above fees New Application - $100 ($20 collected upon application and the balance collected if the license is issued.) Renewal - $25 Amended - $10 Live Scan - $33 per scan plus DOJ fees Psychological testing costs are to be added to the above fees up to $150 State background check fees are to be added to the above fees S-096 VERIFICATION/CLEARANCE FORM/LETTERREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $40 per letter$220 per letter S-097 AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $150 per permit$207 per permit S-098 BLOCK PARTY PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $220 per permit$246 per permit S-100 PRIVATE SPECIAL EVENT PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Event in the Public Right-of-Way - $755 per application Residential Private Event - $995 per application plus $500 deposit Event in the Public Right-of-Way - $703 per application Residential Private Event - $899 per application plus $500 deposit April 16, 2025 21 42Page 266 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-100A DRONE/UNMANNED AIRCRAFT PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $23 per permitInitial Permit - $145 Annual Renewal - $75 S-101 POLICE REPORT REPRODUCTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Fees are limited by the Public Records Act $0.20 per page $0.20 per page/copy S-102 POLICE AUDIO/VIDEO/DVD COPYREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Fees are limited by the Public Records Act $18 per device $18 per device S-103 POLICE PHOTO REPRODUCTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Fees are limited by the Public Records Act $18 per photograph or disk/device $18 per photograph or disk/device S-103A FINGERPRINTING ON REQUESTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed as a separate fee.$33 per scan April 16, 2025 22 43Page 267 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-104 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICESREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Dog License: Spayed/Neutered - $27 Other - $112 Cat License: Spayed/Neutered - $14 Other - $36 Lost Tag - $6 Change Owner: Spayed Neutered - $14 Other - $36 Animal/Fowl Permit - $111 Animal/Fowl Appeal - $111 Dog License: Spayed/Neutered - $27 Other - $112 Cat License: Spayed/Neutered - $14 Other - $36 Lost Tag - $6 Change Owner: Spayed Neutered - $14 Other - $36 Animal/Fowl Permit - $111 Animal/Fowl Appeal - $111 S-104A DOG LICENSE DUPLICATEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $6 per duplicate$6 per duplicate S-105 ANIMAL RELEASE REDEMPTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE First Offense - $65 Second Offense - $141 Third and Subsequent Response - $237 First Offense - $63 Second Offense - $141 Third and Subsequent Response - $237 S-106 DECEASED ANIMAL PICK-UPREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $90 per animal$74 per animal S-108 PET HOME QUARANTINE REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed from the fee schedule.$74 per animal S-108A NON-HOUSEHOLD PET ANIMAL PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $365 per application$138 per application April 16, 2025 23 44Page 268 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-109 MULTIPLE DOG/CAT REVIEWREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $365 per application$138 per application S-109A JAIL SERVICESREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed from the fee schedule.$331 per day S-120 OPEN FIRE PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $28 per permit$28 per permit S-122 AMBULANCE RESPONSE - BLS/ALSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Charge the maximum allowable county rates as calculated by the Los Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency. Charge the maximum allowable county rates as calculated by the Los Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency. S-123A SPECIAL EVENT SECURITYREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as additional security is already added in contracts. $144 per hour per officer S-123B POLICE WITNESS SERVICESREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Fees are set by State Government Code section 28096.1 $275 per day $326 per day April 16, 2025 24 45Page 269 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-125A DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTYREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel used plus any outside costs. Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel used plus any outside costs. S-126 AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAMREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE 3 Day Program - $1,200 per year 5 Day Program - $1,900 per year 3 Day Program - $1,200 per year 5 Day Program - $1,900 per year S-126A SUMMER CAMP PROGRAMREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Resident - $185 per week Non-Resident - $195 per week Resident - $185 per week Non-Resident - $195 per week S-127 RECREATION CLASSESREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Various fees depending on the class: Refund Transaction - $16 Non-Resident Rate: $0-$99 class fee - $5 $100+ class fee - $10 Administrative Fee - 10% of class fee Various fees depending on the class: Refund Transaction - $16 Non-Resident Rate: $0-$99 class fee - $5 $100+ class fee - $10 Administrative Fee - 10% of class fee S-128 SPECIAL EVENT PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Commercial Application Fee - $1,057 Commercial Category I - 70/30 revenue split with the City receiving 30% Commercial Category II - $3,362 Commercial Category III - $3,700 Commercial Category IV - $6,727 Non-Profit - $704 application fee plus $2 per participant Co-Sponsor - $356 per sponsor Set Up - $319 per day Tear Down - $319 per day Event Supervisor - $423 per day City Pass Thru - $353 application fee Late Application: Commercial - $2,056 Non-Profit - $1,370 Commercial Application Fee - $1,057 Commercial Category I - 70/30 revenue split with the City receiving 30% Commercial Category II - $3,362 Commercial Category III - $3,700 Commercial Category IV - $6,727 Non-Profit - $704 application fee plus $2 per participant Co-Sponsor - $356 per sponsor Set Up - $319 per day Tear Down - $319 per day Event Supervisor - $423 per day City Pass Thru - $353 application fee April 16, 2025 25 46Page 270 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-128A LONG-TERM SPEC EVENT AGREEMENTREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Multi-Year Agreement: Commercial - $1,902 Non-Profit - $1,141 None S-128B SPEC EVENT RESERVED PARKING STAGINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $207 per eventNone S-128C SPECIAL EVENT PUBLIC HEARINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $38 per hearing plus actual publication costsNone S-128D SPECIAL EVENT MODIFICATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $114 per applicationNone S-129 EXCURSIONSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Various fees depending on the excursion that recover the direct cost of the excursion. Various fees depending on the excursion that recover the direct cost of the excursion. S-130 THEATER SERVICESREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Application Fee: Theater - $100 Second Story Theater - $26 Various fees depending on the theater, type of performance, and staff and equipment use Application Fee: Theater - $100 Second Story Theater - $27 Various fees depending on the theater, type of performance, and staff and equipment use April 16, 2025 26 47Page 271 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-131 RECREATION FACILITY RENTALSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Application Fee - $28 Recreation Facilities - Various fees depending on the room and group Tennis/Pickleball Courts (Residents only): Instructor/Pro (no lights) - $18 per hour Resident Reservation - $9 per hour All Lighted Hours - $11 per hour $22 per hour (Instructor) Gymnasium: Commercial - $71/hr Non-Profit - $33/hr $140 deposit Pier Plaza: $423 per day staff fee plus $14,081 per day for Comm. Rentals Outdoor Fitness Permit - $130 per month with a $127 annual fee Application Fee - $28 Recreation Facilities - Various fees depending on the room and group Tennis/Pickleball Courts (Residents only): Instructor/Pro (no lights) - $18 per hour Resident Reservation - $9 per hour All Lighted Hours - $11 per hour $22 per hour (Instructor) Gymnasium: Commercial - $71/hr Non-Profit - $33/hr $140 deposit Pier Plaza: $423 per day staff fee plus $14,081 per day for Comm. Rentals Outdoor Fitness Permit - $130 per month with a $127 annual fee S-132 BALLFIELD RENTALSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Field Use - $11 per hour Lighted Fields (7-10 pm) - $25 per hour Field Use - $11 per hour Lighted Fields (7-10 pm) - $25 per hour S-133 FILM PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Filming: Application/Permit Fee - $672 Student Application Fee - $130 Location Fee - $1,569-$3,520 per location per day Film Prep or Strike Fee - $140-$1,394 per location per day Still Photography: Application Fee - $281 Location Fee: First Location - $272 Each Additional Location - $140 Parking Meter - $27 Filming: Application/Permit Fee - $672 Student Application Fee - $130 Location Fee - $1,569-$3,520 per location per day Film Prep or Strike Fee - $140-$1,394 per location per day Still Photography: Application Fee - $281 Location Fee: First Location - $272 Each Additional Location - $140 Parking Meter - $27 S-134 BANNER HANGINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE City Installs - $560 per banner Outside Contractor - $69 per banner plus contractor costs City Install - $762 per banner Outside Contractor - $69 per banner plus contractor costs April 16, 2025 27 48Page 272 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-136 PARKING PERMIT PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Annual - $60 - 3 per yr/per residence - ($30 half year) Replacement - $3 Annual Employees - $175 Monthly Employees Lot C (Daily) - $38, (24 Hour) - $75 Monthly Lot Permit (Daily) - $150, (24 Hour) - $250 Daily - $12 Driveway - (MOVED TO PUBLIC WORKS) Contractor - $42 Oversized Vehicle - $54 Annual Reg, max of 9 guest permits annually or 96 permits fo residents (no cost) Annual - $60 - 3 per yr/per residence - ($30 half year) Replacement - $3 Annual Employees - $175 Monthly Employees Lot C (Daily) - $38, (24 Hour) - $75 Monthly Lot Permit (Daily) - $150, (24 Hour) - $250 Daily - $12 Driveway - $170 (MOVED TO PUBLIC WORKS) Contractor - $42 Oversized Vehicle - $54 Annual Reg, max of 9 guest permits annually or 96 permits fo residents (no cost) S-138 PARKING LOT MONTHLY PASSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed from the fee schedule.Processing fee - $7 (in addition to parking rates) Not currently charging this fee S-139 DAILY PARKING LOT PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed from the fee schedule.Processing fee - $7 (in addition to parking rates) Not currently charging this fee S-139A REFUSE LIEN PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $21 per lien$14 per lien S-139B COMPOSTING/WORM BIN PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Compost Bin - $35 per bin Worm Bin - $70 per bin These fees charged at actual cost and are managed by the Environmental Programs Manager Compost Bin - $35 per bin Worm Bin - $70 per bin These fees charged at actual cost and are managed by the Environmental Programs Manager April 16, 2025 28 49Page 273 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-140 GARAGE SALE PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $8 per permit$8 per permit S-142 NSF CHECK PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $63 per NSF check$61 per NSF check S-143 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Fees are limited by the Public Records Act. $0.20 per copy FPPC-related copies - $0.10 per copy Mailing - $3 $0.20 per copy FPPC-related copies - $0.10 per copy Mailing - $3 S-143A ELECTRONIC FILE COPYREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE Fees are limited by the Public Records Act. $5 per device $5 per device S-144 DOCUMENT CERTIFICATIONREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $4 per document$3 per document S-145 APPEAL TO COUNCIL FROM PW STAFFREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $2,865 per appeal plus noticing costs and poster/advertising costs$3,319 per appeal plus noticing costs and poster/advertising costs April 16, 2025 29 50Page 274 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 FEE COMPARISON REPORT S-147 INTITATIVE PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $200 per initiative Fee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition. This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 9202(b)). $200 per initiative Fee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition. This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 9202(b)). S-150 NEW BUSINESS REGISTRATION PROCESSREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE In-City - $75 Out-of-City - $30 In-City - $43 Out-of-City - $26 S-151 BUSINESS REGISTRATION RENEWALREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $40 per renewal$22 per renewal S-152 BUSINESS LICENSE DUPLICATEREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the service is now performed electronically. $9 per duplicate S-153 CREDIT CARD PROCESSINGREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE 2.5% of the amount charged (minimum $1)2.75% of the amount charged S-154 CANNABIS DELIVERY PERMITREF #:TITLE: CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE $1,070 per application$702 per application April 16, 2025 30 51Page 275 of 1002 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 52Page 276 of 1002 APPENDIX B REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEETS Matched With COST DETAIL WORKSHEETS 53Page 277 of 1002 S-001CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - COMM/OTHER APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review of a proposed conditional use permit to establish a commercial or other use to determine conformance with City codes and standards, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment. 6,065 per application $12,800 per application 100% $6,065.00 $12,798.00 $(6,733.00) 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 47.39% $(33,665) $63,990 $30,325 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 54Page 278 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - COMM/OTHER S-001 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE LIEUTENANT 0.50 $183.17 5 $916 PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 3.50 $478.14 5 $2,391 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 38.50 $5,498.57 5 $27,493 PLANNING BUILDING OFFICIAL 1.00 $241.19 5 $1,206 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2.25 $280.87 5 $1,404 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 4.75 $1,597.24 5 $7,986 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 10.25 $2,696.67 5 $13,483 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 5.00 $965.40 5 $4,827 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SENIOR ENGINEER 3.00 $856.77 5 $4,284 $63,990 $12,798.02 68.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $63,990 68.75TOTALS $12,798.00 55Page 279 of 1002 S-002CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - FENCE/WALL APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review of a proposed conditional use permit to establish a fence or wall to determine conformance with City codes and standards. $2,624 per application $2,985 per application 100% $2,624.00 $2,985.00 $(361.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 87.91% $(361) $2,985 $2,624 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 56Page 280 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - FENCE/WALL S-002 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 0.25 $34.15 1 $34 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 11.00 $1,571.02 1 $1,571 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2.25 $280.87 1 $281 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 1.25 $420.33 1 $420 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 2.58 $678.77 1 $679 $2,985 $2,985.14 17.33TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,985 17.33TOTALS $2,985.00 57Page 281 of 1002 S-002ACUP - WIRELESS COMM. FACILITY APPLICATIONPLANNING Review of a proposed conditional use permit for a wireless communication facility to determine conformance with City codes and standards, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment. $6,065 per application $9,630 per application 100% $6,065.00 $9,629.00 $(3,564.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 62.99% $(3,564) $9,629 $6,065 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 58Page 282 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CUP - WIRELESS COMM. FACILITY S-002A 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 3.50 $478.14 1 $478 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 32.50 $4,641.65 1 $4,642 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2.25 $280.87 1 $281 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 4.75 $1,597.24 1 $1,597 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 10.00 $2,630.90 1 $2,631 $9,629 $9,628.80 53.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $9,629 53.00TOTALS $9,629.00 59Page 283 of 1002 S-003CUP/PDP - CONDO APPLICATION DeveloperPLANNING Review of a proposed conditional use permit and precise development plan for new condominium development for conformance with City codes and standards, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment. $6,299 per application plus $233 per unit over 2 units $9,190 per application plus $590 per every 10 units over 2 units 100% $6,337.83 $9,285.33 $(2,947.50) 6 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 68.26% $(17,685) $55,712 $38,027 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 60Page 284 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CUP/PDP - CONDO S-003 6 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 2 Units 1.00 $136.61 6 $820 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 2 Units 30.00 $4,284.60 6 $25,708 PLANNING BUILDING OFFICIAL 2 Units 1.00 $241.19 6 $1,447 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2 Units 2.50 $312.08 6 $1,872 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 2 Units 5.00 $1,681.30 6 $10,088 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 2 Units 5.25 $1,381.22 6 $8,287 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 2 Units 3.00 $579.24 6 $3,475 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SENIOR ENGINEER 2 Units 2.00 $571.18 6 $3,427 $55,125 $9,187.42 49.75TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Add'l Unit Over 2 3.00 $428.46 1 $428 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Add'l Unit Over 2 0.75 $93.62 1 $94 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Add'l Unit Over 2 0.25 $65.77 1 $66 $588 $587.85 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $55,712 53.75TOTALS $9,285.33 61Page 285 of 1002 S-003AMINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION DeveloperPLANNING Review of a proposed minor conditional use permit. $2,641 per application This fee should be removed from the fee schedule. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 62Page 286 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT S-003A 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 63Page 287 of 1002 S-003BCUP ANNUAL MONITORING REVIEWPLANNING Annual monitoring of the conditions of a Conditional Use Permit to ensure continued compliance with the conditions. None $570 per annual review 100% $0.00 $568.17 $(568.17) 12 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(6,818) $6,818 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 64Page 288 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CUP ANNUAL MONITORING S-003B 12 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 2.25 $321.35 12 $3,856 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.25 $31.21 12 $375 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 0.25 $84.07 12 $1,009 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.50 $131.55 12 $1,579 $6,818 $568.18 3.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $6,818 3.25TOTALS $568.17 65Page 289 of 1002 S-004PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION DeveloperPLANNING Review a proposed development plan for conformance with City codes and standards, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment. Commercial/Mixed Use - $6,624 per application Residential - $6,299 per application Commercial/Mixed Use - $9,125 per application Residential - $8,150 per application 100% $6,380.25 $8,392.13 $(2,011.88) 8 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 76.03% $(16,095) $67,137 $51,042 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 66Page 290 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN S-004 8 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING BUILDING OFFICIAL 1.00 $241.19 8 $1,930 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 3.00 $579.24 8 $4,634 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SENIOR ENGINEER 2.00 $571.18 8 $4,569 $11,133 $1,391.61 6.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Comm/Mixed Use 3.25 $443.98 2 $888 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Comm/Mixed Use 28.50 $4,070.37 2 $8,141 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Comm/Mixed Use 1.75 $218.45 2 $437 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Comm/Mixed Use 3.25 $1,092.85 2 $2,186 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Comm/Mixed Use 7.25 $1,907.40 2 $3,815 $15,466 $7,733.05 44.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Residential 1.00 $136.61 6 $820 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Residential 25.00 $3,570.50 6 $21,423 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Residential 2.50 $312.08 6 $1,872 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Residential 3.25 $1,092.85 6 $6,557 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Residential 6.25 $1,644.31 6 $9,866 $40,538 $6,756.35 38.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $67,137 88.00TOTALS $8,392.13 67Page 291 of 1002 S-004ACOASTAL APPROVAL IN-CONCEPT APPLICATION DeveloperPLANNING Processing a approval in concept of a development in the Coastal Zone for compliance with appropriate codes and standards. Administrative Permit alone - $640 per application Administrative Permit with another application - $321 Plus $4,776 if a hearing is required. Commercial - $660 per application New Single Family Residence - $700 per application Other Residential - $515 per application 100% $480.56 $609.56 $(129.00) 9 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 78.84% $(1,161) $5,486 $4,325 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 68Page 292 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE COASTAL APPROVAL IN-CONCEPT S-004A 9 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Commercial 3.50 $499.87 2 $1,000 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Commercial 0.75 $93.62 2 $187 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Commercial 0.25 $65.77 2 $132 $1,319 $659.26 4.50TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER New SFR 4.25 $606.99 3 $1,821 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH New SFR 0.75 $93.62 3 $281 $2,102 $700.61 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Other Residential 2.50 $357.05 4 $1,428 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Other Residential 0.75 $93.62 4 $374 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Other Residential 0.25 $65.77 4 $263 $2,066 $516.44 3.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $5,486 13.00TOTALS $609.56 69Page 293 of 1002 S-005TEXT AMENDMENT APPLICATION DeveloperPLANNING Review a request to amend the zoning code and/or other titles relating to land use development, including evaluation of internal code consistency and impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment. $7,078 per application $18,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. 100% $7,078.00 $18,043.00 $(10,965.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 39.23% $(10,965) $18,043 $7,078 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 70Page 294 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TEXT AMENDMENT S-005 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 3.50 $478.14 1 $478 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 50.50 $7,212.41 1 $7,212 PLANNING BUILDING OFFICIAL 0.75 $180.89 1 $181 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2.00 $249.66 1 $250 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 14.25 $4,791.71 1 $4,792 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 19.50 $5,130.26 1 $5,130 $18,043 $18,043.07 90.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $18,043 90.50TOTALS $18,043.00 71Page 295 of 1002 S-006ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION DeveloperPLANNING Review a request to amend the zoning map, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment. $5,055 per application $18,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. 100% $5,055.00 $17,420.00 $(12,365.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 29.02% $(12,365) $17,420 $5,055 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 72Page 296 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ZONE CHANGE S-006 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 3.50 $478.14 1 $478 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 49.50 $7,069.59 1 $7,070 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2.00 $249.66 1 $250 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 13.75 $4,623.58 1 $4,624 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 19.00 $4,998.71 1 $4,999 $17,420 $17,419.68 87.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $17,420 87.75TOTALS $17,420.00 73Page 297 of 1002 S-007VARIANCE APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review a proposed variance from the regulations or standards in the zoning code or other titles relevant to land use development. $4,674 per application $9,985 per application 100% $4,674.00 $9,983.00 $(5,309.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 46.82% $(5,309) $9,983 $4,674 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 74Page 298 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE VARIANCE S-007 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 3.50 $478.14 1 $478 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 36.25 $5,177.23 1 $5,177 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2.00 $249.66 1 $250 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 4.50 $1,513.17 1 $1,513 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 9.75 $2,565.13 1 $2,565 $9,983 $9,983.33 56.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $9,983 56.00TOTALS $9,983.00 75Page 299 of 1002 S-008SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION Developer/BusinessPLANNING Review a proposed sign variance from the terms of the zoning code. $3,338 per application $7,980 per application 100% $3,338.00 $7,981.00 $(4,643.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 41.82% $(4,643) $7,981 $3,338 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 76Page 300 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SIGN VARIANCE S-008 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 3.50 $478.14 1 $478 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 25.75 $3,677.62 1 $3,678 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2.25 $280.87 1 $281 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 3.50 $1,176.91 1 $1,177 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 9.00 $2,367.81 1 $2,368 $7,981 $7,981.35 44.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $7,981 44.00TOTALS $7,981.00 77Page 301 of 1002 S-009PARKING PLAN APPLICATION Developer/BusinessPLANNING Review of a proposed plan to provide adequate parking for a development for conformance with City codes and standards. $5,596 per application Planning Review - $8,240 per application Other Department Review - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. 100% $5,596.00 $8,240.00 $(2,644.00) 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 67.91% $(5,288) $16,480 $11,192 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 78Page 302 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PARKING PLAN S-009 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 1.00 $136.61 2 $273 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 30.50 $4,356.01 2 $8,712 PLANNING BUILDING OFFICIAL 1.00 $241.19 2 $482 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2.50 $312.08 2 $624 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 5.00 $1,681.30 2 $3,363 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 5.75 $1,512.77 2 $3,026 $16,480 $8,239.96 45.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $16,480 45.75TOTALS $8,240.00 79Page 303 of 1002 S-010AMENDMENT TO PLANNING ENTITLEMENT APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review of a request to amend an approved Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Permit, Parking Plan, or similar entitlement, for conformance with city codes and standards, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area and city services. $5,343 per application 75% of original application fee 100% $5,343.00 $9,557.00 $(4,214.00) 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 55.91% $(8,428) $19,114 $10,686 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 80Page 304 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE AMENDMENT TO PLANNING ENTITLEMENT S-010 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 3.50 $478.14 2 $956 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 33.00 $4,713.06 2 $9,426 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2.25 $280.87 2 $562 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 3.75 $1,260.98 2 $2,522 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 10.00 $2,630.90 2 $5,262 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 1.00 $193.08 2 $386 $19,114 $9,557.03 53.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $19,114 53.50TOTALS $9,557.00 81Page 305 of 1002 S-011TIME EXTENSION APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Processing a request for an extension of time for a discretionary project. $1,229 per application Director - $1,075 per application Planning Commission - $1,775 per application 100% $1,229.00 $1,425.50 $(196.50) 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 86.22% $(393) $2,851 $2,458 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 82Page 306 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TIME EXTENSION S-011 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Plan Comm 0.75 $102.46 1 $102 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Plan Comm 5.75 $821.22 1 $821 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Plan Comm 0.83 $103.61 1 $104 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Plan Comm 1.25 $420.33 1 $420 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Plan Comm 1.25 $328.86 1 $329 $1,776 $1,776.48 9.83TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Director 0.25 $34.15 1 $34 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Director 4.00 $571.28 1 $571 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Director 0.83 $103.61 1 $104 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Director 0.50 $168.13 1 $168 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Director 0.75 $197.32 1 $197 $1,074 $1,074.49 6.33TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,851 16.16TOTALS $1,425.50 83Page 307 of 1002 S-012TENTATIVE MAP MAP DeveloperPLANNING Review a tentative subdivision or parcel map for conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and City codes and standards, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment. $5,836 per map $8,995 per map 100% $5,836.00 $8,994.33 $(3,158.33) 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 64.89% $(9,475) $26,983 $17,508 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 84Page 308 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TENTATIVE MAP S-012 3 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 2.25 $307.37 3 $922 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 29.00 $4,141.78 3 $12,425 PLANNING BUILDING OFFICIAL 0.50 $120.60 3 $362 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2.50 $312.08 3 $936 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 5.00 $1,681.30 3 $5,044 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 5.25 $1,381.22 3 $4,144 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 1.00 $193.08 3 $579 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SENIOR ENGINEER 3.00 $856.77 3 $2,570 $26,983 $8,994.20 48.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $26,983 48.50TOTALS $8,994.33 85Page 309 of 1002 S-012ASB9 TENTATIVE MAP MAPPLANNING Administrative review a tentative parcel map for conformance with the terms of Senate Bill 9 and City codes and standards. $5,836 per map $4,725 per map 100% $5,836.00 $4,723.00 $1,113.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 123.57% $1,113 $4,723 $5,836 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 86Page 310 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SB9 TENTATIVE MAP S-012A 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 0.25 $34.15 1 $34 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 11.50 $1,642.43 1 $1,642 PLANNING BUILDING OFFICIAL 0.50 $120.60 1 $121 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 1.75 $218.45 1 $218 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 1.50 $504.39 1 $504 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 4.00 $1,052.36 1 $1,052 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 3.00 $579.24 1 $579 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SENIOR ENGINEER 2.00 $571.18 1 $571 $4,723 $4,722.80 24.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $4,723 24.50TOTALS $4,723.00 87Page 311 of 1002 S-013FINAL MAP MAP DeveloperPLANNING Review a final map for conformance with the Subdivision Map Act, tentative map, and City codes and standards. $875 per map $3,315 per map 100% $875.00 $3,314.75 $(2,439.75) 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 26.40% $(9,759) $13,259 $3,500 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 88Page 312 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE FINAL MAP S-013 4 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 4.42 $603.82 4 $2,415 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 2.50 $357.05 4 $1,428 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 0.75 $252.20 4 $1,009 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 1.00 $263.09 4 $1,052 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 2.00 $386.16 4 $1,545 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CITY ENGINEER 1.00 $310.05 4 $1,240 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SENIOR ENGINEER 4.00 $1,142.36 4 $4,569 $13,259 $3,314.73 15.67TYPE SUBTOTAL $13,259 15.67TOTALS $3,314.75 89Page 313 of 1002 S-014LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review a proposed change to the boundary between two or more lots for conformance with City codes and standards. Applicant Requested - $3,652 per application Condition of Approval or Combining Lots - $507 per application Applicant Requested - $4,430 per application Condition of Approval or Combining Lots - $2,490 per application 100% $2,079.50 $3,459.50 $(1,380.00) 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 60.11% $(2,760) $6,919 $4,159 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 90Page 314 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT S-014 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Appl Request 1.00 $136.61 1 $137 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Appl Request 8.50 $1,213.97 1 $1,214 PLANNING BUILDING OFFICIAL Appl Request 0.50 $120.60 1 $121 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Appl Request 0.75 $93.62 1 $94 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Appl Request 0.75 $252.20 1 $252 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Appl Request 1.92 $505.13 1 $505 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER Appl Request 5.00 $965.40 1 $965 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SENIOR ENGINEER Appl Request 4.00 $1,142.36 1 $1,142 $4,430 $4,429.89 22.42TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Cond Of Approval 1.00 $136.61 1 $137 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Cond Of Approval 8.50 $1,213.97 1 $1,214 PLANNING BUILDING OFFICIAL Cond Of Approval 0.50 $120.60 1 $121 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Cond Of Approval 1.92 $239.67 1 $240 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Cond Of Approval 0.75 $252.20 1 $252 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Cond Of Approval 2.00 $526.18 1 $526 $2,489 $2,489.23 14.67TYPE SUBTOTAL $6,919 37.09TOTALS $3,459.50 91Page 315 of 1002 S-015GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - TEXT APPLICATION DeveloperPLANNING Review of a proposed text amendment to the City General Plan, including evaluation of internal General Plan consistency and impacts on the city and the environment. $6,466 per application or deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. $15,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. 100% $6,466.00 $15,040.00 $(8,574.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 42.99% $(8,574) $15,040 $6,466 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 92Page 316 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - TEXT S-015 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 3.50 $478.14 1 $478 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 40.00 $5,712.80 1 $5,713 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2.00 $249.66 1 $250 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 13.25 $4,455.45 1 $4,455 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 15.75 $4,143.67 1 $4,144 $15,040 $15,039.72 74.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $15,040 74.50TOTALS $15,040.00 93Page 317 of 1002 S-016GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - MAP APPLICATION DeveloperPLANNING Review of a proposed amendment to the City General Plan map, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment. $4,804 per application $12,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. 100% $4,804.00 $11,790.00 $(6,986.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 40.75% $(6,986) $11,790 $4,804 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 94Page 318 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - MAP S-016 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 3.50 $478.14 1 $478 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 28.25 $4,034.67 1 $4,035 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2.00 $249.66 1 $250 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 9.75 $3,278.54 1 $3,279 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 14.25 $3,749.03 1 $3,749 $11,790 $11,790.04 57.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $11,790 57.75TOTALS $11,790.00 95Page 319 of 1002 S-017MURAL REVIEW APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review of a proposed mural for conformance with City codes and standards by the Planning Commission. $578 per application $3,010 per application 100% $578.00 $3,009.00 $(2,431.00) 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 19.21% $(4,862) $6,018 $1,156 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 96Page 320 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE MURAL REVIEW S-017 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 1.75 $239.07 2 $478 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 8.75 $1,249.68 2 $2,499 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 1.58 $197.23 2 $394 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 1.00 $336.26 2 $673 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.75 $986.59 2 $1,973 $6,018 $3,008.83 16.83TYPE SUBTOTAL $6,018 16.83TOTALS $3,009.00 97Page 321 of 1002 S-018TEMPORARY USE PERMIT APPLICATION Developer/BusinessPLANNING Review of a proposed temporary use for conformance with City codes and standards and impacts on the surrounding area and city services, such as construction trailers and seasonal sales. $589 per application Temporary Seasonal Sales - $805 per application Temporary Minor Special Event - $1,900 per application Date Change - $335 per application 100% $589.00 $1,370.63 $(781.63) 8 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 42.97% $(6,253) $10,965 $4,712 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 98Page 322 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT S-018 8 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Temp Seasonal Sales 1.00 $136.61 1 $137 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Temp Seasonal Sales 3.25 $464.17 1 $464 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Temp Seasonal Sales 0.58 $72.40 1 $72 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Temp Seasonal Sales 0.50 $131.55 1 $132 $805 $804.73 5.33TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Temp Minor Spec Ev 1.00 $136.61 5 $683 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Temp Minor Spec Ev 6.50 $928.33 5 $4,642 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Temp Minor Spec Ev 0.58 $72.40 5 $362 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Temp Minor Spec Ev 0.50 $168.13 5 $841 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Temp Minor Spec Ev 2.25 $591.95 5 $2,960 $9,487 $1,897.42 10.83TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Date Change 1.00 $142.82 2 $286 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Date Change 0.50 $62.42 2 $125 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Date Change 0.50 $131.55 2 $263 $674 $336.79 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $10,965 18.16TOTALS $1,370.63 99Page 323 of 1002 S-018AM-1 ZONE LIMITED EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION Business/Comm. GroupPLANNING Review of a proposed Limited Event in the M-1 Zone for conformance with City codes and standards and impacts on the surrounding area and city services. $520 per application $1,100 per application 100% $520.00 $1,098.00 $(578.00) 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 47.36% $(1,156) $2,196 $1,040 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 100Page 324 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE M-1 ZONE LIMITED EVENTS PERMIT S-018A 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 4.25 $606.99 2 $1,214 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.50 $131.55 2 $263 BUILDING & SAFETY ADMIN ASSISTANT 0.83 $102.93 2 $206 BUILDING & SAFETY BLDG & PLANNING TECH 2.25 $256.66 2 $513 $2,196 $1,098.13 7.83TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,196 7.83TOTALS $1,098.00 101Page 325 of 1002 S-019SLOPE/GRADE HEIGHT DETERMINATION APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review and determination of grade or slope of a specific property by the Planning Commission $3,527 per application $3,340 per application 100% $3,527.00 $3,340.00 $187.00 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 105.60% $374 $6,680 $7,054 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 102Page 326 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SLOPE/GRADE HEIGHT DETERMINATION S-019 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 2.00 $273.22 2 $546 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 12.17 $1,738.12 2 $3,476 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 1.50 $187.25 2 $375 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 1.83 $615.36 2 $1,231 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 2.00 $526.18 2 $1,052 $6,680 $3,340.13 19.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $6,680 19.50TOTALS $3,340.00 103Page 327 of 1002 S-020HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review of a proposed exception to a height limit applicable to a project by the Planning Commission. $4,910 per application $3,240 per application 100% $4,910.00 $3,241.00 $1,669.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 151.50% $1,669 $3,241 $4,910 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 104Page 328 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION S-020 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 1.00 $136.61 1 $137 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 12.17 $1,738.12 1 $1,738 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.58 $72.40 1 $72 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 1.50 $504.39 1 $504 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.00 $789.27 1 $789 $3,241 $3,240.79 18.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,241 18.25TOTALS $3,241.00 105Page 329 of 1002 S-021LEGAL DETERMINATION REQUEST Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review and determination of the legality of nonconforming buildings by the Planning Commission. $5,024 per application $3,570 per application 100% $5,024.00 $3,570.00 $1,454.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 140.73% $1,454 $3,570 $5,024 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 106Page 330 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LEGAL DETERMINATION S-021 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 1.00 $136.61 1 $137 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 8.00 $1,142.56 1 $1,143 PLANNING BUILDING OFFICIAL 3.00 $723.57 1 $724 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.58 $72.40 1 $72 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 1.25 $420.33 1 $420 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.00 $789.27 1 $789 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING INSPECTOR 2.00 $284.86 1 $285 $3,570 $3,569.60 18.83TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,570 18.83TOTALS $3,570.00 107Page 331 of 1002 S-022UNUSUAL ARCHITECTURAL/BUILDING REV APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review of buildings with unusual architecture or other potential adverse conditions by the Planning Commission. $3,039 per application $2,560 per application 100% $3,039.00 $2,561.00 $478.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 118.66% $478 $2,561 $3,039 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 108Page 332 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE UNUSUAL ARCHITECTURAL/BUILDING REV S-022 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 1.00 $136.61 1 $137 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 8.00 $1,142.56 1 $1,143 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.58 $72.40 1 $72 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 1.25 $420.33 1 $420 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.00 $789.27 1 $789 $2,561 $2,561.17 13.83TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,561 13.83TOTALS $2,561.00 109Page 333 of 1002 S-023DETERMINATION OF SIMILAR USE APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Confirmation of a request that a use is similar to others in the specific zoning district. $2,457 per application 50% of this fee would be credited towards future code text amendment fees related to the same project. $4,425 per application 50% of this fee would be credited towards future code text amendment fees related to the same project. 100% $2,457.00 $4,426.00 $(1,969.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 55.51% $(1,969) $4,426 $2,457 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 110Page 334 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DETERMINATION OF SIMILAR USE S-023 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 1.00 $136.61 1 $137 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 13.25 $1,892.37 1 $1,892 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.58 $72.40 1 $72 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 3.00 $1,008.78 1 $1,009 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 5.00 $1,315.45 1 $1,315 $4,426 $4,425.61 22.83TYPE SUBTOTAL $4,426 22.83TOTALS $4,426.00 111Page 335 of 1002 S-024PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Request for an interpretation of a zoning code requirement by the Planning Commission. $1,857 per application $3,015 per application 100% $1,857.00 $3,015.00 $(1,158.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 61.59% $(1,158) $3,015 $1,857 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 112Page 336 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION S-024 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 1.00 $136.61 1 $137 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 10.00 $1,428.20 1 $1,428 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.58 $72.40 1 $72 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 1.75 $588.46 1 $588 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.00 $789.27 1 $789 $3,015 $3,014.94 16.33TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,015 16.33TOTALS $3,015.00 113Page 337 of 1002 S-025REQST FOR REASONABLE ACCOMODATION APPLICATION ResidentPLANNING Review a request for variation from zoning or building codes, procedures, or policies to afford a person with a disability equal access to housing. $1,116 per application This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the review is included in other applications. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 114Page 338 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE REQST FOR REASONABLE ACCOMODATION S-025 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 115Page 339 of 1002 S-026CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review of a proposed project to determine if the project is categorically or statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). $233 per application Class 32 - $935 per application plus deposit determined by staff for actual consultant charges Other - $510 per application 100% $233.00 $525.40 $(292.40) 30 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 44.35% $(8,772) $15,762 $6,990 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 116Page 340 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION S-026 30 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Class 1-31 2.00 $285.64 29 $8,284 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Class 1-31 0.08 $9.99 29 $290 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Class 1-31 0.25 $84.07 29 $2,438 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Class 1-31 0.50 $131.55 29 $3,815 $14,826 $511.25 2.83TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Class 32 + Consult 3.50 $499.87 1 $500 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Class 32 0.25 $31.21 1 $31 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Class 32 0.42 $141.23 1 $141 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Class 32 1.00 $263.09 1 $263 $935 $935.40 5.17TYPE SUBTOTAL $15,762 8.00TOTALS $525.40 117Page 341 of 1002 S-027INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION APPLICATION DeveloperPLANNING Preparation and review of an initial study and mitigated/negative declaration/monitoring program pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). $4,240 per application Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. 100% $4,240.00 $5,997.00 $(1,757.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 70.70% $(1,757) $5,997 $4,240 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 118Page 342 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION S-027 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 2.00 $273.22 1 $273 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 28.00 $3,998.96 1 $3,999 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 2.00 $672.52 1 $673 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 4.00 $1,052.36 1 $1,052 $5,997 $5,997.06 36.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $5,997 36.00TOTALS $5,997.00 119Page 343 of 1002 S-028RECIRCULATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION APPLICATION DeveloperPLANNING Preparation and recirculation of a revised initial study and mitigated/negative declaration/monitoring program pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). $2,630 per application Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. 100% $2,630.00 $1,969.00 $661.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 133.57% $661 $1,969 $2,630 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 120Page 344 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE RECIRCULATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION S-028 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 1.50 $204.92 1 $205 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 10.00 $1,428.20 1 $1,428 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 1.00 $336.26 1 $336 $1,969 $1,969.38 12.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,969 12.50TOTALS $1,969.00 121Page 345 of 1002 S-029ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REVIEW REPORT DeveloperPLANNING Preparation and review of an environmental impact report and mitigation monitoring program pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 122Page 346 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REVIEW S-029 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 123Page 347 of 1002 S-030PLANNING SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION Developer/BusinessPLANNING Review an individual sign application for conformance with City codes and standards. $795 per application $1,395 per application 100% $795.00 $1,395.00 $(600.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 56.99% $(600) $1,395 $795 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 124Page 348 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PLANNING SIGN PERMIT S-030 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 1.00 $136.61 1 $137 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 6.00 $856.92 1 $857 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.58 $72.40 1 $72 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 1.25 $328.86 1 $329 $1,395 $1,394.79 8.83TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,395 8.83TOTALS $1,395.00 125Page 349 of 1002 S-030APLANNING A-FRAME SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION BusinessPLANNING Review an individual A-Frame sign application for conformance with City codes and standards. New - $201 per application Annual Renewal - $121 per renewal New - $250 per application Annual Renewal - $110 per renewal 80% $181.00 $340.50 $(159.50) 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 53.16% $(638) $1,362 $724 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 126Page 350 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PLANNING A-FRAME SIGN PERMIT S-030A 4 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 0.50 $68.31 4 $273 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 1.50 $214.23 4 $857 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.25 $31.21 4 $125 $1,255 $313.75 2.25TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Renewal 0.75 $107.12 1 $107 $107 $107.12 0.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,362 3.00TOTALS $340.50 127Page 351 of 1002 S-031MASTER SIGN PROGRAM APPLICATION Developer/BusinessPLANNING Review a master sign program for projects with multiple signs to assure conformance with City codes and standards. $822 per application $770 per application 100% $822.00 $771.00 $51.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 106.61% $51 $771 $822 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 128Page 352 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE MASTER SIGN PROGRAM S-031 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 4.00 $571.28 1 $571 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.25 $31.21 1 $31 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 0.50 $168.13 1 $168 $771 $770.62 4.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $771 4.75TOTALS $771.00 129Page 353 of 1002 S-032TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION BusinessPLANNING Review of a temporary sign for conformance with City codes and standards. $106 per application $105 per application 100% $106.00 $102.50 $3.50 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 103.41% $14 $410 $424 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 130Page 354 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT S-032 4 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 0.50 $71.41 4 $286 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.25 $31.21 4 $125 $410 $102.62 0.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $410 0.75TOTALS $102.50 131Page 355 of 1002 S-032AMINOR PLANNING SIGN REVIEW APPLICATION BusinessPLANNING Review of a minor sign plan to assure compliance with appropriate code requirements. $145 per application This fee should be removed from the fee schedule. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 132Page 356 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE MINOR PLANNING SIGN REVIEW S-032A 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 133Page 357 of 1002 S-033ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT APPLICATION BusinessPLANNING Review an administrative use permit for conformance with City codes and standards. $621 per application Temp Minor Special Event (Expedited 3 Day Review) - 200% x fee $2,100 per application Temp Minor Special Event (Expedited 3 Day Review) - 200% x fee 100% $621.00 $2,102.00 $(1,481.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 29.54% $(1,481) $2,102 $621 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 134Page 358 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT S-033 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 1.00 $136.61 1 $137 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 6.75 $964.04 1 $964 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.83 $103.61 1 $104 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 0.25 $84.07 1 $84 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 3.00 $789.27 1 $789 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING INSPECTOR 0.17 $24.21 1 $24 $2,102 $2,101.81 12.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,102 12.00TOTALS $2,102.00 135Page 359 of 1002 S-034ADMIN PERMIT - ABANDON CUP APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review an administrative use permit for abandonment of an existing Conditional Use Permit for conformance with City codes and standards. $802 per application $1,740 per application 100% $802.00 $1,740.00 $(938.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 46.09% $(938) $1,740 $802 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 136Page 360 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ADMIN PERMIT - ABANDON CUP S-034 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 0.50 $68.31 1 $68 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 6.00 $856.92 1 $857 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.67 $83.64 1 $84 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 1.00 $336.26 1 $336 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 1.50 $394.64 1 $395 $1,740 $1,739.77 9.67TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,740 9.67TOTALS $1,740.00 137Page 361 of 1002 S-034AADMIN PERMIT-SHORT TERM VAC. RENTAL APPLICATIONPLANNING Review of a short term rental operation located within the City for compliance with City codes and standards. $2,100 - Initial Permit $1,816 - Annual Renewal $660 per application 100% $2,100.00 $659.00 $1,441.00 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 318.66% $2,882 $1,318 $4,200 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 138Page 362 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ADMIN PERMIT-SHORT TERM VAC. RENTAL S-034A 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 3.00 $428.46 2 $857 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.75 $93.62 2 $187 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.25 $65.77 2 $132 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING INSPECTOR 0.50 $71.22 2 $142 $1,318 $659.07 4.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,318 4.50TOTALS $659.00 139Page 363 of 1002 S-035DEED RESTRICTION/COVENANT REVIEW APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review of a deed restriction or covenant required by the Municipal Code or as a condition of approval. $855 per application $832 per application 100% $855.00 $806.78 $48.22 18 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 105.98% $868 $14,522 $15,390 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 140Page 364 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DEED RESTRICTION/COVENANT REVIEW S-035 18 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY CLERK CITY CLERK 0.50 $104.65 18 $1,884 PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 0.25 $34.15 18 $615 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 3.50 $499.87 18 $8,998 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 0.50 $168.13 18 $3,026 $14,522 $806.80 4.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $14,522 4.75TOTALS $806.78 141Page 365 of 1002 S-036DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT DeveloperPLANNING Develop, negotiate, and enforce an agreement to develop land, addressing use, design, infrastructure, and other relevant requirements. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 142Page 366 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT S-036 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 143Page 367 of 1002 S-037LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review a landscape plan for conformance with City codes and standards. Small - $368 per application Small - $360 per application Large - $700 per application 100% $368.00 $374.30 $(6.30) 20 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 98.32% $(126) $7,486 $7,360 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 144Page 368 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW S-037 20 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Small 2.50 $357.05 19 $6,784 $6,784 $357.05 2.50TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Small 0.50 $68.31 1 $68 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Large 4.00 $571.28 1 $571 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Large 0.50 $62.42 1 $62 $702 $702.01 5.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $7,486 7.50TOTALS $374.30 145Page 369 of 1002 S-038PLNG LANDSCAPE DOC PACKAGE REV APPLICATION Developer/BusinessPLANNING Review landscape plan of 2,500 square feet or larger for conformance with City codes and standards. $689 per application This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as it is now included in Landscape Plan Review (S-037). 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 146Page 370 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PLNG LANDSCAPE DOC PACKAGE REV S-038 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 147Page 371 of 1002 S-039APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPEAL Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review an appeal of a decision of City staff to the Planning Commission. $3,180 per appeal $2,960 per appeal 100% $3,180.00 $2,957.00 $223.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 107.54% $223 $2,957 $3,180 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 148Page 372 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION S-039 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 2.00 $273.22 1 $273 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 9.17 $1,309.66 1 $1,310 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.50 $62.42 1 $62 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 1.75 $588.46 1 $588 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 2.75 $723.50 1 $724 $2,957 $2,957.26 16.17TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,957 16.17TOTALS $2,957.00 149Page 373 of 1002 S-040APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPEAL Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review an appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission, or as otherwise specified by the code, to the City Council. $2,179 per appeal plus: Second Noticing: Residential 300' Radius - $301 Legal Ad - $201 Poster - $226 Total - $728 Non-Residential 500' Radius - $668 Legal Ad - $201 Poster - $226 Total - $1,095 $5,170 per appeal plus actual noticing/advertising costs 100% $2,179.00 $5,172.00 $(2,993.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 42.13% $(2,993) $5,172 $2,179 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 150Page 374 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL S-040 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY CLERK DEP CITY CLERK 2.00 $254.56 1 $255 PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 0.33 $45.08 1 $45 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 14.92 $2,130.87 1 $2,131 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.50 $62.42 1 $62 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 4.25 $1,429.11 1 $1,429 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 4.75 $1,249.68 1 $1,250 $5,172 $5,171.72 26.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $5,172 26.75TOTALS $5,172.00 151Page 375 of 1002 S-041PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW REVIEW Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Preliminary plan review, zone check, and/or detailed written material for a potential project. $161 per meeting This fee will credited against future fees for a consistent project. Residential - $1,165 per review Residential with Other Departments - $1,695 per review Non-Residential - $1,275 per review Non-Residential with Other Departments - $2,430 per review 50% of this fee will credited against future Planning application fees if project is submitted within 6 months. 100% $161.00 $1,437.29 $(1,276.29) 14 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 11.20% $(17,868) $20,122 $2,254 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 152Page 376 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW S-041 14 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Residential 5.17 $738.38 8 $5,907 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Residential 0.50 $62.42 8 $499 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Residential 0.50 $168.13 8 $1,345 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Residential 0.75 $197.32 8 $1,579 $9,330 $1,166.25 6.92TYPE SUBTOTAL CITY MANAGER ENVIRON PROG MANAGER Res With Other Dept 0.50 $106.30 2 $213 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Res With Other Dept 5.67 $809.79 2 $1,620 PLANNING BUILDING OFFICIAL Res With Other Dept 0.50 $120.60 2 $241 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Res With Other Dept 0.50 $62.42 2 $125 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Res With Other Dept 0.50 $168.13 2 $336 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Res With Other Dept 1.25 $328.86 2 $658 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER Res With Other Dept 0.50 $96.54 2 $193 $3,385 $1,692.64 9.42TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Non-Residential 6.50 $928.33 2 $1,857 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Non-Residential 0.50 $62.42 2 $125 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Non-Residential 0.25 $84.07 2 $168 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Non-Residential 0.75 $197.32 2 $395 $2,544 $1,272.14 8.00TYPE SUBTOTAL POLICE POLICE LIEUTENANT Non-Res W/Other Dept 1.00 $366.34 2 $733 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Non-Res W/Other Dept 7.50 $1,071.15 2 $2,142 PLANNING BUILDING OFFICIAL Non-Res W/Other Dept 1.00 $241.19 2 $482 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Non-Res W/Other Dept 0.50 $62.42 2 $125 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Non-Res W/Other Dept 0.50 $168.13 2 $336 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Non-Res W/Other Dept 1.25 $328.86 2 $658 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER Non-Res W/Other Dept 1.00 $193.08 2 $386 153Page 377 of 1002 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK The costs shown on the facing page are a continued listing of costs listed on the page immediately preceding. 154Page 378 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW S-041 14 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST $4,862 $2,431.17 12.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $20,122 37.09TOTALS $1,437.29 155Page 379 of 1002 S-041ASB35 PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW APPLICATIONPLANNING Preliminary review a potential residential project with affordable housing or other components which locks in development standards. $161 per meeting $1,780 per application 50% of this fee will credited against future Planning application fees if project is submitted within 6 months. 100% $161.00 $1,782.00 $(1,621.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 9.03% $(1,621) $1,782 $161 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 156Page 380 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SB35 PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW S-041A 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY MANAGER ENVIRON PROG MANAGER 0.50 $106.30 1 $106 PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 0.25 $34.15 1 $34 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 5.25 $749.81 1 $750 PLANNING BUILDING OFFICIAL 0.50 $120.60 1 $121 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.75 $93.62 1 $94 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 0.75 $252.20 1 $252 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 1.25 $328.86 1 $329 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 0.50 $96.54 1 $97 $1,782 $1,782.08 9.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,782 9.75TOTALS $1,782.00 157Page 381 of 1002 S-042EXTRA MEETING MEETING Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Conduct an extra meeting (typically a third meeting) prior to or after application submittal to determine project requirements. $782 per meeting $761 per meeting 100% $782.00 $741.00 $41.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 105.53% $41 $741 $782 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 158Page 382 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE EXTRA MEETING S-042 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 3.00 $428.46 1 $428 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.25 $31.21 1 $31 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 0.25 $84.07 1 $84 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.75 $197.32 1 $197 $741 $741.06 4.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $741 4.25TOTALS $741.00 159Page 383 of 1002 S-043SPECIAL COMMUNITY MEETING MEETING DeveloperPLANNING Due to project complexity, special conditions, or opposition, conduct a special community meeting to gain input and address issues. $1,617 per meeting $2,895 per meeting 100% $1,617.00 $2,897.00 $(1,280.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 55.82% $(1,280) $2,897 $1,617 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 160Page 384 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SPECIAL COMMUNITY MEETING S-043 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT 0.50 $68.31 1 $68 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 5.00 $714.10 1 $714 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.25 $31.21 1 $31 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 1.50 $504.39 1 $504 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 6.00 $1,578.54 1 $1,579 $2,897 $2,896.55 13.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,897 13.25TOTALS $2,897.00 161Page 385 of 1002 S-044TRAFFIC/SPECIAL STUDY REVIEW STUDY DeveloperPLANNING Review of a traffic study or other special study when required. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 162Page 386 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TRAFFIC/SPECIAL STUDY REVIEW S-044 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 163Page 387 of 1002 S-045EXTRA PLAN REVIEW REVIEW Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Additional review of a submitted plan over the standard number of plan reviews due to the actions or inactions of the applicant. Actual charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Actual charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 164Page 388 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE EXTRA PLAN REVIEW S-045 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Deposit 0.00 $0.00 1 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 165Page 389 of 1002 S-046ZONING LETTER LETTER Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Processing a request for the zoning or conduct of detailed research of a particular parcel on request. $240 per letter $555 per letter 100% $240.00 $557.00 $(317.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 43.09% $(317) $557 $240 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 166Page 390 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ZONING LETTER S-046 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 3.00 $428.46 1 $428 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.50 $62.42 1 $62 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.25 $65.77 1 $66 $557 $556.65 3.75TYPE SUBTOTAL $557 3.75TOTALS $557.00 167Page 391 of 1002 S-047NEW/MODIFIED BUSINESS ZONING REVIEW BUSINESS BusinessPLANNING Review of a new business or change to an existing business to assure conformance with City codes and standards and approved entitlements. $79 per business $130 per business 100% $79.00 $131.56 $(52.56) 124 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 60.05% $(6,517) $16,313 $9,796 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 168Page 392 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE NEW/MODIFIED BUSINESS ZONING REVIEW S-047 124 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 0.50 $71.41 124 $8,855 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.25 $31.21 124 $3,870 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER 0.11 $28.94 124 $3,589 $16,313 $131.56 0.86TYPE SUBTOTAL $16,313 0.86TOTALS $131.56 169Page 393 of 1002 S-048PUBLIC NOTICING NOTICE DeveloperPLANNING Noticing of a proposed project by mail, publication, or posting, when required by City codes or State law. 300 foot radius: First Notice - $1,007 Second Notice - $301 500 foot radius: First Notice - $1,676 Second Notice - $668 Poster - $226 Enhanced Noticing/Outreach - Actual Costs Legal Ad (Easy Reader) - $192 300 foot radius: First Notice - $980 Second Notice - $293 500 foot radius: First Notice - $1,630 Second Notice - $650 Poster - $220 Enhanced Noticing/Outreach - Actual Costs Legal Ad (Easy Reader) - $187 100% $1,233.00 $1,125.10 $107.90 30 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 109.59% $3,237 $33,753 $36,990 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 170Page 394 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PUBLIC NOTICING S-048 30 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Noticing 2.25 $307.37 30 $9,221 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Noticing 0.50 $71.41 30 $2,142 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Noticing 0.25 $84.07 30 $2,522 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Noticing 0.25 $65.77 30 $1,973 PLANNING Postage & Supplies 0.00 $455.20 30 $13,656 $29,515 $983.82 3.25TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Poster 0.25 $34.15 30 $1,025 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Poster 0.75 $107.12 30 $3,214 $4,238 $141.27 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $33,753 4.25TOTALS $1,125.10 171Page 395 of 1002 S-049GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE PERMIT Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING Maintenance and update of the City General Plan and other documents or policies pursuant to Government Code section 66014. $3 per $1,000 building permit valuation This fee is applied to all residential and commercial construction with a valuation of $100,000 or more per site/project. 10% of Building Permit and Plan Check fees 100% $49,000.00 $197,262.00 $(148,262.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 24.84% $(148,262) $197,262 $49,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 172Page 396 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE S-049 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING Contract Services 0.00 $150,344.00 1 $150,344 ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE Contract Services 0.00 $9,445.00 1 $9,445 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE Contract Services 0.00 $37,473.00 1 $37,473 $197,262 $197,262.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $197,262 0.00TOTALS $197,262.00 173Page 397 of 1002 S-049ARECORDS TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM PERMIT Developer/Resident/BusinessBUILDING Management and imaging of development records. 7% of all Building Permit and Plan Check fees, Planning fees, and Engineering Fees. 7% of all Building Permit and Plan Check fees, Planning fees, and Engineering Fees. 100% $90,000.00 $112,216.00 $(22,216.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 80.20% $(22,216) $112,216 $90,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 174Page 398 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE RECORDS TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM S-049A 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST BUILDING & SAFETY $600k Over 8 Years 0.00 $75,000.00 1 $75,000 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN Doc Mgmt & Imaging 0.00 $37,216.00 1 $37,216 $112,216 $112,216.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $112,216 0.00TOTALS $112,216.00 175Page 399 of 1002 S-050HISTORIC RESOURCE REVIEW APPLICATION Resident/BusinessPLANNING Review of a removal of historic designation or Certificate of Appropriateness issued by the City Council, or an administrative review of a Certificate of Appropriateness for conformance with City codes and standards. Minor Certification - $1,016 Major Certification - $2,752 Nomination - $3,152 Removal - $5,244 Waiver of 90% of fees available (limited to 2 waivers per fiscal year) Minor Certification - $1,880 Major Certification - $4,005 Nomination - $4,620 Removal - $4,610 Waiver of 90% of fees available (limited to 2 waivers per fiscal year) 100% $3,041.00 $3,779.75 $(738.75) 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 80.46% $(2,955) $15,119 $12,164 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 176Page 400 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE HISTORIC RESOURCE REVIEW S-050 4 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Removal 1.25 $170.76 1 $171 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Removal 18.50 $2,642.17 1 $2,642 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Removal 3.00 $1,008.78 1 $1,009 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Removal 3.00 $789.27 1 $789 $4,611 $4,610.98 25.75TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Minor Certif 0.75 $102.46 1 $102 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Minor Certif 9.00 $1,285.38 1 $1,285 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Minor Certif 0.50 $62.42 1 $62 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Minor Certif 0.50 $168.13 1 $168 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Minor Certif 1.00 $263.09 1 $263 $1,881 $1,881.48 11.75TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Major Certif 1.75 $239.07 1 $239 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Major Certif 11.50 $1,642.43 1 $1,642 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Major Certif 0.50 $62.42 1 $62 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Major Certif 3.00 $1,008.78 1 $1,009 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Major Certif 4.00 $1,052.36 1 $1,052 $4,005 $4,005.06 20.75TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ADMIN ASSISTANT Nomination 1.25 $170.76 1 $171 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Nomination 17.00 $2,427.94 1 $2,428 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH Nomination 0.75 $93.62 1 $94 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR Nomination 3.00 $1,008.78 1 $1,009 PLANNING PLANNING MANAGER Nomination 3.50 $920.82 1 $921 $4,622 $4,621.92 25.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $15,119 83.75TOTALS $3,779.75 177Page 401 of 1002 S-051BUILDING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION PERMIT Developer/Resident/BusinessBUILDING Check building and construction plans to assure conformance of proposed works with City codes and standards, and inspection and permit issuance of construction to assure conformance with City codes and standards. Permits - Various fees based on project valuation and construction counts Plan Check - 80% of Building Permit fee Expedited Plan Check - 150% of the standard plan check fee See Appendix C 100% $815.47 $1,242.24 $(426.77) 1,478 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 65.65% $(630,767) $1,836,031 $1,205,264 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 178Page 402 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BUILDING PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION S-051 1,478 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 10%-Sr/40%-Ac/50%-At 0.87 $124.72 1,478 $184,336 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 10% 0.32 $39.68 1,478 $58,647 BUILDING & SAFETY ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 30%/30%/40% 1.14 $145.80 1,478 $215,492 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING OFFICIAL Remainder Of 45% 0.98 $215.36 1,478 $318,302 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING INSPECTOR Remainder Of 2 2.20 $313.85 1,478 $463,870 BUILDING & SAFETY BLDG & PLANNING TECH Remainder Of 60% 0.62 $71.10 1,478 $105,086 BUILDING & SAFETY CODE ENFORCE OFFICER 50% Of 2 1.14 $134.27 1,478 $198,451 BUILDING & SAFETY PLANNING MANAGER 20% 0.23 $54.22 1,478 $80,137 BUILDING & SAFETY Contract Svcs/Priv 0.00 $143.24 1,478 $211,709 $1,836,031 $1,242.24 7.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,836,031 7.50TOTALS $1,242.24 179Page 403 of 1002 S-052SOLAR PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION SYSTEM Developer/Resident/BusinessBUILDING Review and inspection of a new photovoltaic solar system for conformance with City codes and standards. Residential Solar: 1-15kW: $463, with anything over 15kW an additional $15 per additional 1kW. Commercial Solar: 1-50kW: $721, with anything over 50kW an additional $7 per additional 1kW. Residential Solar: 1-15kW: $450, with anything over 15kW an additional $15 per additional 1kW. Commercial Solar: 1-50kW: $701, with anything over 50kW an additional $7 per additional 1kW. 100% $512.62 $485.83 $26.79 78 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 105.51% $2,089 $37,895 $39,984 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 180Page 404 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SOLAR PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION S-052 78 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Plan Check 0.50 $71.41 78 $5,570 $5,570 $71.41 0.50TYPE SUBTOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING OFFICIAL SFR Plan Check 0.50 $109.48 63 $6,897 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING INSPECTOR SFR Inspection 1.00 $142.43 63 $8,973 BUILDING & SAFETY BLDG & PLANNING TECH SFR Inspection 1.00 $114.07 63 $7,186 $23,057 $365.98 2.50TYPE SUBTOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING OFFICIAL MFR/Comm P/C 1.00 $218.96 15 $3,284 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING INSPECTOR MFR/Comm Inspection 2.00 $284.86 15 $4,273 BUILDING & SAFETY BLDG & PLANNING TECH MFR/Comm Inspection 1.00 $114.07 15 $1,711 $9,268 $617.89 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $37,895 7.00TOTALS $485.83 181Page 405 of 1002 S-057BUILDING ADDRESS CHANGE ADDRESS Resident/BusinessBUILDING Review of a request to change the address number of a particular building. $301 per address $195 per address 100% $301.00 $196.08 $104.92 12 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 153.51% $1,259 $2,353 $3,612 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 182Page 406 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BUILDING ADDRESS CHANGE S-057 12 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING OFFICIAL 0.50 $109.48 12 $1,314 BUILDING & SAFETY BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.25 $28.52 12 $342 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SR OFFICE ASSISTANT 0.50 $58.07 12 $697 $2,353 $196.07 1.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,353 1.25TOTALS $196.08 183Page 407 of 1002 S-061NPDES STORMWATER INSPECTIONS INSPECTION BusinessENVIRON. SERVICES Review and inspection of restaurants and auto repair facilities for conformance with clean water run-off standards, including grease control device inspections. $266 per inspection plus $42 per grease control device $265 per inspection 100% $266.00 $264.15 $1.85 141 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 100.70% $261 $37,245 $37,506 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 184Page 408 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE NPDES STORMWATER INSPECTIONS S-061 141 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY MANAGER ENVIRON PROG MANAGER 20 Hr/Yr 0.14 $30.11 141 $4,246 STORM DRAIN Contract Costs 0.00 $234.04 141 $33,000 $37,245 $264.15 0.14TYPE SUBTOTAL $37,245 0.14TOTALS $264.15 185Page 409 of 1002 S-062AUTO REPAIR - NPDES INSPECTION INSPECTION BusinessENVIRON. SERVICES Review and inspection of light industry establishments, such as car washes, auto repair shops, and gas stations, for conformance with clean water run-off standards. $266 per inspection (2 inspections in 5 years) Remove this fee from the fee schedule as it is now included as part of NPDES Stormwater Inspections (S-061). 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 186Page 410 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE AUTO REPAIR - NPDES INSPECTION S-062 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 187Page 411 of 1002 S-063STORMWATER MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Review of a Stormwater Mitigation Plan for conformance with local and national standards. $640 per application If contract services are used, charge the actual cost of the contract services. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 188Page 412 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE STORMWATER MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW S-063 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 189Page 413 of 1002 S-064PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK PLAN DeveloperENGINEERING Review of civil plan sets for any additions to the City's infrastructure by a private party. Review of civil plan sets for permits applicable to private developments, etc. Single Family Residence/Multi Family Residence/Commercial: $1,451 per plan plus $240 per each additional dwelling unit up to 4 units Multi Family Residential over 4 dwelling units/Other - Deposit determined by staff (minimum of $2,500) with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Single Family Residence/Multi Family Residence (up to 4 units): $3,695 per plan Other - Deposit determined by staff (minimum of $4,000) with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100% $1,931.00 $3,693.07 $(1,762.07) 82 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 52.29% $(144,490) $302,832 $158,342 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 190Page 414 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK S-064 82 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 5.00 $965.40 82 $79,163 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER 12.00 $1,846.44 82 $151,408 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CITY ENGINEER 1.00 $310.05 82 $25,424 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SENIOR ENGINEER 2.00 $571.18 82 $46,837 $302,832 $3,693.07 20.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $302,832 20.00TOTALS $3,693.07 191Page 415 of 1002 S-065STREET/ROW VACATION REVIEW APPLICATION DeveloperENGINEERING Review a request to vacate a portion of a street or other public right-of-way. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 192Page 416 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE STREET/ROW VACATION REVIEW S-065 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 193Page 417 of 1002 S-066ENGINEERING STUDY/REPORT REVIEW STUDY Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Review of an Engineering Study or Report when required. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Stop Sign or Traffic Review Resident Requests - No charge for the first review. For any review within two years of the last review charge full costs of the review. Speed Cushion Installation - No Charge Speed Cushion Removal - Actual Costs Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Stop Sign or Traffic Review Resident Requests - No charge for the first review. For any review within two years of the last review charge full costs of the review. Speed Cushion Installation - No Charge Speed Cushion Removal - Actual Costs 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 194Page 418 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ENGINEERING STUDY/REPORT REVIEW S-066 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 195Page 419 of 1002 S-067ASSESSMENT DIST FORMATION RESEARCH DISTRICT DeveloperENGINEERING Research related to the formation of an Assessment District. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 196Page 420 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ASSESSMENT DIST FORMATION RESEARCH S-067 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 197Page 421 of 1002 S-068PLAN SHEET REPRODUCTION SHEET Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Producing copies of plan sheets on request. $45 per sheet for the first sheet plus $5 per each additional sheet or actual cost if using an outside copier $59 per sheet for the first sheet plus $7 per each additional sheet or actual cost if using an outside copier 100% $45.00 $59.00 $(14.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 76.27% $(14) $59 $45 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 198Page 422 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PLAN SHEET REPRODUCTION S-068 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0.50 $59.25 1 $59 $59 $59.25 0.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $59 0.50TOTALS $59.00 199Page 423 of 1002 S-069NON-UTIL R-O-W IMPROVEMENT PERMIT PERMIT Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of a non-utility street excavation in the public right-of-way, such as sidewalk, driveway, curb/gutter, cross gutter, and access ramp improvements. $807 per permit $395 per permit per improvement type Improvement types are Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk, and/or Driveway, Paving, Cross Gutter, Curb Ramp 100% $807.00 $393.55 $413.45 190 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 205.06% $78,555 $74,775 $153,330 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 200Page 424 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE NON-UTIL R-O-W IMPROVEMENT PERMIT S-069 190 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 1.00 $193.08 190 $36,685 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0.50 $59.25 190 $11,258 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 1.00 $141.22 190 $26,832 $74,775 $393.55 2.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $74,775 2.50TOTALS $393.55 201Page 425 of 1002 S-070UTILITY SERVICE PERMIT PERMIT UtilityENGINEERING Review and inspection of utility service work and street restoration in the public right-of-way. 0-25 linear feet - $674 25-100 linear feet - $1,182 100+ linear feet - $240 for each additional 150 linear feet Over 1,000 linear feet - Actual Costs Utility Infrastructure Work - Actual Costs 0-25 linear feet - $970 25-100 linear feet - $1,525 100+ linear feet - $275 for each additional 150 linear feet Over 1,000 linear feet - Actual Costs Utility Infrastructure Work - Actual Costs 100% $783.00 $1,065.74 $(282.74) 250 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 73.47% $(70,686) $266,436 $195,750 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 202Page 426 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE UTILITY SERVICE PERMIT S-070 250 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER 0-50 Lin Ft 2.00 $307.74 150 $46,161 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0-50 Lin Ft 2.00 $237.00 150 $35,550 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 0-50 Lin Ft 3.00 $423.66 150 $63,549 $145,260 $968.40 7.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER 50-100 Lin Ft 3.00 $461.61 75 $34,621 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 50-100 Lin Ft 3.00 $355.50 75 $26,663 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 50-100 Lin Ft 5.00 $706.10 75 $52,958 $114,241 $1,523.21 11.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER Add'l 100 Lin Ft 0.50 $76.94 25 $1,924 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH Add'l 100 Lin Ft 0.50 $59.25 25 $1,481 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Add'l 100 Lin Ft 1.00 $141.22 25 $3,531 $6,935 $277.41 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $266,436 20.00TOTALS $1,065.74 203Page 427 of 1002 S-071SEWER LATERAL INSTALLATION PERMIT PERMIT Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of the installation of a sewer lateral in the public right-of-way. $717 per permit Basic Permit - $510 per permit Large Permit - Deposit determined by staff (minimum of $1,000) with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100% $717.00 $508.84 $208.16 19 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 140.91% $3,955 $9,668 $13,623 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 204Page 428 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SEWER LATERAL INSTALLATION PERMIT S-071 19 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 0.50 $96.54 19 $1,834 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0.50 $59.25 19 $1,126 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 2.50 $353.05 19 $6,708 $9,668 $508.84 3.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $9,668 3.50TOTALS $508.84 205Page 429 of 1002 S-072SEWER CAP APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of the closure of a sewer service. $161 per permit $200 per permit 100% $161.00 $200.45 $(39.45) 20 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 80.32% $(789) $4,009 $3,220 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 206Page 430 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SEWER CAP S-072 20 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0.50 $59.25 20 $1,185 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 1.00 $141.22 20 $2,824 $4,009 $200.47 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $4,009 1.50TOTALS $200.45 207Page 431 of 1002 S-073MATERIAL STORAGE DROP-OFF PERMIT PERMIT Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of material storage drop-off in the public right-of-way. $266 per permit Permit is valid for one day $200 per permit plus per day Parking Meter rates (for up to 40 linear feet) Permit is valid for one day 100% $266.00 $200.50 $65.50 8 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 132.67% $524 $1,604 $2,128 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 208Page 432 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE MATERIAL STORAGE DROP-OFF PERMIT S-073 8 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0.50 $59.25 8 $474 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 1.00 $141.22 8 $1,130 $1,604 $200.47 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,604 1.50TOTALS $200.50 209Page 433 of 1002 S-074STAGING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT PERMIT Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of staging equipment in the public right-of-way, such as concrete trucks, water trucks, or moving trucks. $266 per permit plus $17 per meter per day Permit is valid for one day $340 per permit plus per day Parking Meter rates (for up to 40 linear feet) Permit is valid for up to 14 days 100% $266.00 $341.69 $(75.69) 200 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 77.85% $(15,138) $68,338 $53,200 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 210Page 434 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE STAGING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT S-074 200 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0.50 $59.25 200 $11,850 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 2.00 $282.44 200 $56,488 $68,338 $341.69 2.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $68,338 2.50TOTALS $341.69 211Page 435 of 1002 S-075CRANE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT PERMIT/TRIP Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of the use of a crane in the public right-of-way. $266 per permit Permit is valid for one day $200 per permit plus per day Parking Meter rates (for up to 40 linear feet) Plus associated traffic control review costs as needed Permit is valid for one day 100% $266.00 $200.48 $65.52 48 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 132.68% $3,145 $9,623 $12,768 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 212Page 436 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CRANE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT S-075 48 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0.50 $59.25 48 $2,844 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 1.00 $141.22 48 $6,779 $9,623 $200.47 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $9,623 1.50TOTALS $200.48 213Page 437 of 1002 S-075AMOVING VAN RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT PERMITENGINEERING Review and inspection of the use of a moving van in the public right-of-way. $266 per permit $60 per permit plus per day Parking Meter rates (for up to 40 linear feet) 100% $266.00 $59.25 $206.75 150 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 448.92% $31,012 $8,888 $39,900 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 214Page 438 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE MOVING VAN RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT S-075A 150 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0.50 $59.25 150 $8,888 $8,888 $59.25 0.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $8,888 0.50TOTALS $59.25 215Page 439 of 1002 S-076SCAFFOLDING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT PERMIT Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of scaffolding in the public right-of-way. $345 per permit, plus $26 per day after 14 days $555 per permit plus per day Parking Meter rates Permit is valid for 14 days 100% $345.00 $554.83 $(209.83) 18 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 62.18% $(3,777) $9,987 $6,210 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 216Page 440 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SCAFFOLDING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT S-076 18 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER 1.00 $153.87 18 $2,770 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 1.00 $118.50 18 $2,133 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 2.00 $282.44 18 $5,084 $9,987 $554.81 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $9,987 4.00TOTALS $554.83 217Page 441 of 1002 S-077TEMPORARY FENCE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT PERMIT Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of a temporary fence in the public right-of-way. $266 per permit plus $17 per day after 14 days $275 per permit Permit is valid for 14 days 100% $266.00 $277.41 $(11.41) 17 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 95.89% $(194) $4,716 $4,522 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 218Page 442 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TEMPORARY FENCE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT S-077 17 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER 0.50 $76.94 17 $1,308 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0.50 $59.25 17 $1,007 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 1.00 $141.22 17 $2,401 $4,716 $277.41 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $4,716 2.00TOTALS $277.41 219Page 443 of 1002 S-078VALET PARKING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT PERMIT BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of the request for an event-related valet parking space in the public right-of-way. New/Annual - $226 per permit plus $18 per meter per day This fee should be removed from the fee schedule. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 220Page 444 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE VALET PARKING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT S-078 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 221Page 445 of 1002 S-079ROLL-OFF BIN RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT PERMIT Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of a roll-off refuse bin in the public right-of-way. $187 per permit Permit is valid for 14 days $205 per permit plus per day Parking Meter rates (for up to 40 linear feet) Permit is valid for 14 days 100% $187.00 $206.80 $(19.80) 35 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 90.43% $(693) $7,238 $6,545 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 222Page 446 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ROLL-OFF BIN RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT S-079 35 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER 0.50 $76.94 35 $2,693 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0.50 $59.25 35 $2,074 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 0.50 $70.61 35 $2,471 $7,238 $206.80 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $7,238 1.50TOTALS $206.80 223Page 447 of 1002 S-080RESIDENTIAL ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PERMIT Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of a request for a residential permanent encroachment in the public right-of-way. $1,536 per permit $2,760 per permit 100% $1,536.00 $2,761.75 $(1,225.75) 8 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 55.62% $(9,806) $22,094 $12,288 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 224Page 448 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE RESIDENTIAL ENCROACHMENT PERMIT S-080 8 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 3.00 $579.24 8 $4,634 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CITY ENGINEER 2.00 $620.10 8 $4,961 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0.50 $59.25 8 $474 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1.00 $364.01 8 $2,912 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 2.00 $282.44 8 $2,260 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SENIOR ENGINEER 3.00 $856.77 8 $6,854 $22,094 $2,761.81 11.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $22,094 11.50TOTALS $2,761.75 225Page 449 of 1002 S-081TEMP OUTDOOR DINING/RETAIL ENCR PMT PERMIT BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of a request for commercial outdoor dining or retail signs in the public right-of-way. Outdoor Dining Encroachment: Standard Off-Street - $1,664 Simple Off-Street - $506 On-Street - $1,948 Annual Renewal - $409 Minor Alteration - $322 Simple Off-Street - $505 per permit Standard Off-Street - $1,815 per permit On-Street - $2,115 per permit Annual Renewal - $365 per permit Minor Alteration - $355 per permit Third Party consultant review will be billed at cost if necessary. 100% $969.80 $1,030.80 $(61.00) 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 94.08% $(305) $5,154 $4,849 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 226Page 450 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TEMP OUTDOOR DINING/RETAIL ENCR PMT S-081 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY MANAGER ENVIRON PROG MANAGER Standard Off-Street 0.50 $106.30 1 $106 POLICE POLICE SERGEANT Standard Off-Street 0.50 $158.38 1 $158 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Standard Off-Street 0.50 $71.41 1 $71 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING OFFICIAL Standard Off-Street 2.00 $437.92 1 $438 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING INSPECTOR Standard Off-Street 1.00 $142.43 1 $142 BUILDING & SAFETY CODE ENFORCE OFFICER Standard Off-Street 0.50 $59.14 1 $59 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER Standard Off-Street 1.00 $193.08 1 $193 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CITY ENGINEER Standard Off-Street 0.50 $155.03 1 $155 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH Standard Off-Street 1.00 $118.50 1 $119 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Standard Off-Street 0.25 $91.00 1 $91 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Standard Off-Street 2.00 $282.44 1 $282 $1,816 $1,815.63 9.75TYPE SUBTOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING INSPECTOR Simple Off-Street 0.50 $71.22 1 $71 BUILDING & SAFETY CODE ENFORCE OFFICER Simple Off-Street 0.50 $59.14 1 $59 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CITY ENGINEER Simple Off-Street 0.50 $155.03 1 $155 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH Simple Off-Street 0.50 $59.25 1 $59 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Simple Off-Street 0.25 $91.00 1 $91 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Simple Off-Street 0.50 $70.61 1 $71 $506 $506.25 2.75TYPE SUBTOTAL CITY MANAGER ENVIRON PROG MANAGER On-Street 0.50 $106.30 1 $106 POLICE POLICE SERGEANT On-Street 0.50 $158.38 1 $158 PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER On-Street 0.50 $71.41 1 $71 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING OFFICIAL On-Street 2.00 $437.92 1 $438 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING INSPECTOR On-Street 1.00 $142.43 1 $142 BUILDING & SAFETY CODE ENFORCE OFFICER On-Street 0.50 $59.14 1 $59 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER On-Street 1.50 $289.62 1 $290 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CITY ENGINEER On-Street 0.50 $155.03 1 $155 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH On-Street 1.00 $118.50 1 $119 227Page 451 of 1002 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK The costs shown on the facing page are a continued listing of costs listed on the page immediately preceding. 228Page 452 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TEMP OUTDOOR DINING/RETAIL ENCR PMT S-081 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR On-Street 0.50 $182.01 1 $182 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR On-Street 2.00 $282.44 1 $282 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN Traffic Consultant 0.00 $110.00 1 $110 $2,113 $2,113.18 10.50TYPE SUBTOTAL PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER Annual Renewal 0.50 $71.41 1 $71 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING INSPECTOR Annual Renewal 0.50 $71.22 1 $71 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH Annual Renewal 0.50 $59.25 1 $59 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Annual Renewal 0.25 $91.00 1 $91 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Annual Renewal 0.50 $70.61 1 $71 $363 $363.49 2.25TYPE SUBTOTAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CITY ENGINEER Minor Alteration 0.50 $155.03 1 $155 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH Minor Alteration 0.50 $59.25 1 $59 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Minor Alteration 1.00 $141.22 1 $141 $356 $355.50 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $5,154 27.25TOTALS $1,030.80 229Page 453 of 1002 S-081ADRIVEWAY PARKING PERMIT PERMIT Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Review of and processing of a request to park in front of one's own driveway. Driveway - $170 Initial - $485 Annual Renewal - $50 100% $0.13 $51.40 $(51.27) 1,345 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.25% $(68,965) $69,135 $170 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 230Page 454 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DRIVEWAY PARKING PERMIT S-081A 1,345 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Initial 0.42 $65.01 1 $65 COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMIN SVCS COORDINATOR Initial 0.83 $169.99 1 $170 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH Initial 0.25 $29.63 1 $30 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Initial 0.08 $29.12 1 $29 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Initial 1.00 $141.22 1 $141 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SENIOR ENGINEER Initial 0.17 $48.55 1 $49 $484 $483.52 2.75TYPE SUBTOTAL REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Renewal 0.33 $51.08 1,344 $68,652 $68,652 $51.08 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL $69,135 3.08TOTALS $51.40 231Page 455 of 1002 S-081BFOOD TRUCK PERMIT PERMIT BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of a request for the operation of a food truck in the public right-of-way, including City Council review. None Initial - $3,635 Annual Renewal - $225 100% $0.00 $1,930.50 $(1,930.50) 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(3,861) $3,861 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 232Page 456 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE FOOD TRUCK PERMIT S-081B 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER Initial 8.00 $1,544.64 1 $1,545 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CITY ENGINEER Initial 2.00 $620.10 1 $620 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH Initial 2.00 $237.00 1 $237 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Initial 3.00 $1,092.03 1 $1,092 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Initial 1.00 $141.22 1 $141 $3,635 $3,634.99 16.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER Annual Renewal 0.50 $96.54 1 $97 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH Annual Renewal 0.50 $59.25 1 $59 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Annual Renewal 0.50 $70.61 1 $71 $226 $226.40 1.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,861 17.50TOTALS $1,930.50 233Page 457 of 1002 S-081CA-FRAME ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PERMIT BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of a request for the placement of an A-Frame sign in the public right-of-way. $339 per permit $460 per permit 100% $339.00 $460.00 $(121.00) 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 73.70% $(605) $2,300 $1,695 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 234Page 458 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE A-FRAME ENCROACHMENT PERMIT S-081C 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 1.50 $289.62 5 $1,448 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 0.08 $29.12 5 $146 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 1.00 $141.22 5 $706 $2,300 $459.96 2.58TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,300 2.58TOTALS $460.00 235Page 459 of 1002 S-081DAWNING ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PERMIT BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of a request for the placement of an awning in the public right-of-way. $339 per permit $555 per permit 100% $339.00 $556.60 $(217.60) 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 60.91% $(1,088) $2,783 $1,695 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 236Page 460 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE AWNING ENCROACHMENT PERMIT S-081D 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 2.00 $386.16 5 $1,931 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 0.08 $29.12 5 $146 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 1.00 $141.22 5 $706 $2,783 $556.50 3.08TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,783 3.08TOTALS $556.60 237Page 461 of 1002 S-082NEWSRACK PERMIT NEWSRACK BusinessENGINEERING Review and inspection of newsracks in the public right-of-way. New - $421 per permit plus $54 per newsrack Annual - $33 per newsrack New - $450 per permit plus $95 per newsrack Annual - $360 per newsrack 100% $106.67 $390.17 $(283.50) 6 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 27.34% $(1,701) $2,341 $640 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 238Page 462 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE NEWSRACK PERMIT S-082 6 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER New 1.00 $153.87 1 $154 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH New 0.50 $59.25 1 $59 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN MANAGEMENT ANALYST New 1.00 $167.35 1 $167 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR New 0.50 $70.61 1 $71 $451 $451.08 3.00TYPE SUBTOTAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER New - Per Rack 0.17 $26.16 1 $26 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR New - Per Rack 0.50 $70.61 1 $71 $97 $96.77 0.67TYPE SUBTOTAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN MANAGEMENT ANALYST Renewal 2.00 $334.70 5 $1,674 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Renewal 0.17 $24.01 5 $120 $1,794 $358.71 2.17TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,341 5.84TOTALS $390.17 239Page 463 of 1002 S-083WIDE/LONG LOAD PERMIT PERMIT BusinessENGINEERING Review the proposed route, vehicle, and cost of potential damage done by a vehicle that exceeds the allowable weight, height, or width limits for general travel on City streets. Single Trip - $20 Annual Permit - $114 Fees are set by the State Single Trip - $16 Annual Permit - $90 Fees are set by the State 10% $20.00 $155.80 $(135.80) 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 12.84% $(679) $779 $100 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 240Page 464 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE WIDE/LONG LOAD PERMIT S-083 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 0.50 $96.54 5 $483 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0.50 $59.25 5 $296 $779 $155.79 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $779 1.00TOTALS $155.80 241Page 465 of 1002 S-083ATEMPORARY NO PARKING SIGNS SignENGINEERING Printing of Temporary No Parking signs for private encroachments. None $3 per 10 signs 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 242Page 466 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TEMPORARY NO PARKING SIGNS S-083A 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 243Page 467 of 1002 S-084TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN REVIEW PLAN DeveloperENGINEERING Review of a traffic control plan when required. $513 per plan or actual costs as determined by City staff Basic Plan - $310 per permit Large Plan - Deposit determined by staff (minimum of $1,000) with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100% $513.00 $311.60 $201.40 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 164.63% $1,007 $1,558 $2,565 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 244Page 468 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN REVIEW S-084 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 1.00 $193.08 5 $965 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 1.00 $118.50 5 $593 $1,558 $311.58 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,558 2.00TOTALS $311.60 245Page 469 of 1002 S-084APUBLIC TREE REMOVAL REQUEST REVIEW TREE Resident/BusinessPUBLIC WORKS Review of a request to remove of a public tree in the parkway on request. $238 per tree Up to 12 inch diameter - $205 per tree Over 12 inch diameter - $1,195 per tree Plus cost of Arborist Report 100% $238.00 $372.00 $(134.00) 12 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 63.98% $(1,608) $4,464 $2,856 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 246Page 470 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PUBLIC TREE REMOVAL REQUEST REVIEW S-084A 12 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER > 12 Inch 3.00 $461.61 2 $923 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CITY ENGINEER > 12 Inch 1.00 $310.05 2 $620 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH > 12 Inch 0.50 $59.25 2 $119 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR > 12 Inch 1.00 $364.01 2 $728 $2,390 $1,194.92 5.50TYPE SUBTOTAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER < 12 Inch 0.25 $48.27 10 $483 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER < 12 Inch 0.25 $38.47 10 $385 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH < 12 Inch 0.25 $29.63 10 $296 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR < 12 Inch 0.25 $91.00 10 $910 $2,074 $207.37 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $4,464 6.50TOTALS $372.00 247Page 471 of 1002 S-084BPUBLIC TREE INSTALLATION REVIEW TREE Resident/BusinessPUBLIC WORKS Review of the installation of a tree in the public parkway. $240 per tree $60 per tree 100% $240.00 $59.29 $180.71 7 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 404.82% $1,265 $415 $1,680 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 248Page 472 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PUBLIC TREE INSTALLATION REVIEW S-084B 7 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 0.42 $59.31 7 $415 $415 $59.31 0.42TYPE SUBTOTAL $415 0.42TOTALS $59.29 249Page 473 of 1002 S-084CDISABLED PARKING SPACE INSTALLATION SPACE Developer/BusinessPUBLIC WORKS Installation of a disabled public parking space on request. $2,938 per request, with a waiver for those with a household income under $75,000. Application - $1,775 Installation - $1,415 Waiver for those with a household income under $75,000. 100% $2,938.00 $2,188.00 $750.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 134.28% $750 $2,188 $2,938 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 250Page 474 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DISABLED PARKING SPACE INSTALLATION S-084C 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 3.00 $579.24 1 $579 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER 3.00 $461.61 1 $462 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CITY ENGINEER 1.00 $310.05 1 $310 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 0.50 $59.25 1 $59 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1.00 $364.01 1 $364 $1,774 $1,774.16 8.50TYPE SUBTOTAL STREET MAINT/TRAFF.MAINT. WORKER II + $1,000 Materials 2.00 $167.08 1 $167 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PW SUPERINTENDENT 1.00 $246.41 1 $246 $413 $413.49 3.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,188 11.50TOTALS $2,188.00 251Page 475 of 1002 S-084DPUBLIC BENCH DEDICATION BENCH Resident/BusinessPUBLIC WORKS Review and installation of bench dedication in the public right-of-way. Bench - $1,555 plus the cost of the bench, materials, and plaque Plaque Replacement - $561 plus the cost of the plaque and materials Remains a Donation. Bench - $1,545 plus the cost of the bench, materials, and plaque Concrete Footing - $165 plus the cost of materials Plaque Replacement - $475 plus the cost of the plaque and materials Remains a Donation. 100% $1,389.33 $1,601.67 $(212.34) 6 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 86.74% $(1,274) $9,610 $8,336 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 252Page 476 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PUBLIC BENCH DEDICATION S-084D 6 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER 2.00 $307.74 6 $1,846 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH 1.00 $118.50 6 $711 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 1.00 $141.22 6 $847 $3,405 $567.46 4.00TYPE SUBTOTAL STREET MAINT/TRAFF.MAINT. CREW SUPV 1.00 $129.11 5 $646 STREET MAINT/TRAFF.MAINT. WORKER II 8.00 $668.32 5 $3,342 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PW SUPERINTENDENT 0.50 $123.21 5 $616 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SR OFFICE ASSISTANT 0.50 $58.07 5 $290 $4,894 $978.71 10.00TYPE SUBTOTAL STREET MAINT/TRAFF.MAINT. WORKER II Concrete Footing 2.00 $167.08 5 $835 $835 $167.08 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL STREET MAINT/TRAFF.MAINT. WORKER II Plaque Replacement 1.00 $83.54 1 $84 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSISTANT ENGINEER Plaque Replacement 1.00 $153.87 1 $154 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PW SUPERINTENDENT Plaque Replacement 0.50 $123.21 1 $123 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SR OFFICE ASSISTANT Plaque Replacement 1.00 $116.14 1 $116 $477 $476.76 3.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $9,610 19.50TOTALS $1,601.67 253Page 477 of 1002 S-084EEXTRA PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION CHECK/INSPECTION Developer/Resident/BusinessENGINEERING Extra Plan Checks or Inspections that are needed over the standard number of plan checks or inspections. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 254Page 478 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE EXTRA PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION S-084E 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 255Page 479 of 1002 S-084FWIRELESS ENCROACHMENT PMT APPL APPLICATIONPUBLIC WORKS Review and processing of a request for a wireless encroachment. $2,500 per application in the form of a deposit to be drawn down for actual hours spent reviewing and processing application. $2,500 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 10 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 256Page 480 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE WIRELESS ENCROACHMENT PMT APPL S-084F 10 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 257Page 481 of 1002 S-084GSIDEWALK VENDING PERMIT PERMIT BusinessENGINEERING Review of a temporary sidewalk encroachment of a merchandise vendor for compliance with City codes and standards. $406 - Initial Permit $406 - Annual Renewal Preliminary Application (Per Location) - $255 Final Application (Per Location) - $255 Renewal - $335 100% $406.00 $281.67 $124.33 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 144.14% $373 $845 $1,218 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 258Page 482 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SIDEWALK VENDING PERMIT S-084G 3 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CITY ENGINEER Preliminary 0.08 $24.80 1 $25 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH Preliminary 0.75 $88.88 1 $89 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Preliminary 1.00 $141.22 1 $141 $255 $254.90 1.83TYPE SUBTOTAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CITY ENGINEER Final 0.17 $52.71 1 $53 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH Final 0.50 $59.25 1 $59 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Final 1.00 $141.22 1 $141 $253 $253.18 1.67TYPE SUBTOTAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN CITY ENGINEER Renewal 0.25 $77.51 1 $78 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH Renewal 1.00 $118.50 1 $119 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Renewal 1.00 $141.22 1 $141 $337 $337.23 2.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $845 5.75TOTALS $281.67 259Page 483 of 1002 S-084HTOBACCO RETAILER LICENSE RENEWAL RENEWALREVENUE SERVICES Processing a request for a renewal for a retailer to sell tobacco products within the City. $503 - Initial Application $428 - Annual Renewal $40 per renewal 100% $503.00 $39.00 $464.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY:1,289.74% $464 $39 $503 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 260Page 484 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TOBACCO RETAILER LICENSE RENEWAL S-084H 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK 0.25 $38.70 1 $39 $39 $38.70 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $39 0.25TOTALS $39.00 261Page 485 of 1002 S-084JLIMITED LIVE ENTERTAIN PERMIT FEE PERMIT BusinessPLANNING Review of entertainment, such as live music, dancing, and karaoke, for compliance with City codes and standards. $297 per permit $350 per permit 100% $297.00 $348.00 $(51.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 85.34% $(51) $348 $297 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 262Page 486 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LIMITED LIVE ENTERTAIN PERMIT FEE S-084J 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PLANNING ASST/ASSOC PLANNER 2.00 $285.64 1 $286 PLANNING BLDG & PLANNING TECH 0.50 $62.42 1 $62 $348 $348.06 2.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $348 2.50TOTALS $348.00 263Page 487 of 1002 S-085POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE RESPONSE Resident/BusinessPOLICE Responding to an alarm by a Police Officer where the officer can find no evidence of forced entry and it is concluded that the alarm was activated due to an electrical/mechanical malfunction or user error. 3 free responses in a calendar year Each subsequent response: Burglary Alarm - $118 Robbery Alarm - $333 3 free responses in a calendar year Each subsequent response: Burglary Alarm - $120 Robbery Alarm - $390 100% $0.00 $235.31 $(235.31) 351 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(82,595) $82,595 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 264Page 488 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE S-085 351 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE OFFICER Burglary 0.25 $54.93 117 $6,427 $6,427 $54.93 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL POLICE POLICE OFFICER Robbery-20 Min Of 3 1.00 $219.60 234 $51,386 POLICE POLICE SERGEANT Robbery 0.33 $104.53 234 $24,460 $75,846 $324.13 1.33TYPE SUBTOTAL POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER Notice 0.50 $64.45 5 $322 $322 $64.45 0.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $82,595 2.08TOTALS $235.31 265Page 489 of 1002 S-086POLICE ALARM PERMIT PERMIT Resident/BusinessPOLICE Registration of a burglar alarm in the City so as to have accurate contact information. New/Annual - $24 per permit New/Annual - $23 per permit 100% $24.00 $21.83 $2.17 300 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 109.96% $652 $6,548 $7,200 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 266Page 490 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE POLICE ALARM PERMIT S-086 300 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER New 0.17 $21.77 25 $544 $544 $21.77 0.17TYPE SUBTOTAL POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER Renewal 0.17 $21.83 275 $6,003 $6,003 $21.83 0.17TYPE SUBTOTAL $6,548 0.34TOTALS $21.83 267Page 491 of 1002 S-087DUI COLLISION RESPONSE RESPONSE Resident/Non-ResidentPOLICE Responding to and investigating a DUI accident which results in property damage, injury, or death. Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all emergency personnel responding, not to exceed $12,000 per incident by State law. Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all emergency personnel responding, not to exceed $12,000 per incident by State law. 100% $136.07 $1,627.00 $(1,490.93) 30 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 8.36% $(44,728) $48,810 $4,082 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 268Page 492 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DUI COLLISION RESPONSE S-087 30 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE OFFICER 2.00 $439.23 30 $13,177 POLICE POLICE SERGEANT 2.00 $633.50 30 $19,005 COMMUNITY SERVICES CMTY SRVC OFFICER 2 Hrs Of 2 4.00 $554.28 30 $16,628 $48,810 $1,627.01 8.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $48,810 8.00TOTALS $1,627.00 269Page 493 of 1002 S-087ALOUD PARTY RESPONSE RESPONSE Resident/BusinessPOLICE Response to a loud party after an initial warning. First Response - No Charge Each subsequent Response - Actual Cost First Response - No Charge Each subsequent Response - Actual Cost 100% $0.00 $72.44 $(72.44) 200 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(14,488) $14,488 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 270Page 494 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LOUD PARTY RESPONSE S-087A 200 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE OFFICER 0.33 $72.44 200 $14,488 $14,488 $72.44 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL $14,488 0.33TOTALS $72.44 271Page 495 of 1002 S-088VEHICLE IMPOUND RELEASE VEHICLE Resident/Non-ResidentPOLICE Collection and release of a vehicle impounded by the City. $274 per vehicle Bicycle, Scooter, and Other Wheeled Devices - $168 $325 per vehicle Bicycle, Scooter, and Other Wheeled Devices - $163 100% $274.00 $325.08 $(51.08) 500 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 84.29% $(25,540) $162,540 $137,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 272Page 496 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE VEHICLE IMPOUND RELEASE S-088 500 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE OFFICER Impound 0.75 $164.69 500 $82,345 POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER Release 0.17 $21.82 500 $10,910 COMMUNITY SERVICES CMTY SRVC OFFICER Impound 1.00 $138.57 500 $69,285 $162,540 $325.08 1.92TYPE SUBTOTAL $162,540 1.92TOTALS $325.08 273Page 497 of 1002 S-090CITATION SIGN-OFF CITATION Resident/Non-ResidentPOLICE Sign-off a mechanical violation citation. Resident - No Charge Non-Resident - $60 per citation Resident - No Charge Non-Resident - $50 per citation 100% $0.00 $47.60 $(47.60) 500 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(23,800) $23,800 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 274Page 498 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CITATION SIGN-OFF S-090 500 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE OFFICER 0.17 $37.33 500 $18,665 POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER 0.08 $10.27 500 $5,135 $23,800 $47.60 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $23,800 0.25TOTALS $47.60 275Page 499 of 1002 S-091VEHICLE REPOSSESSION VEHICLE Resident/Non-ResidentPOLICE Receive and enter repossessed vehicles into the statewide computer system. $15 per vehicle This fee is set by the State $15 per vehicle This fee is set by the State 35% $15.00 $42.35 $(27.35) 20 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 35.42% $(547) $847 $300 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 276Page 500 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE VEHICLE REPOSSESSION S-091 20 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER 0.33 $42.37 20 $847 $847 $42.37 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL $847 0.33TOTALS $42.35 277Page 501 of 1002 S-092BOOKING PROCESSING BOOKING Resident/Non-ResidentPOLICE Processing a person who was arrested and booked. $445 per booking This fee should be removed from the fee schedule. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 278Page 502 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BOOKING PROCESSING S-092 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 279Page 503 of 1002 S-093TAXICAB INSPECTION TAXICAB BusinessPOLICE Safety inspections of taxicabs operating in the City. First Inspection - No Charge (part of franchise fee) Subsequent Inspection - $67 One Day Taxicab Franchise Fee - $44 Dial-A-Taxi Permit - No Charge This fee should be removed from the fee schedule. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 280Page 504 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE TAXICAB INSPECTION S-093 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 281Page 505 of 1002 S-094POLICE BUSINESS BACKGROUND CHECK APPLICATION BusinessPOLICE Processing an application in which a background check for the applicant is needed. $339 per application plus any state fees $390 per application plus any state fees 100% $339.00 $388.30 $(49.30) 10 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 87.30% $(493) $3,883 $3,390 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 282Page 506 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE POLICE BUSINESS BACKGROUND CHECK S-094 10 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE LIEUTENANT 1.00 $366.34 10 $3,663 POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER 0.17 $21.95 10 $220 $3,883 $388.29 1.17TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,883 1.17TOTALS $388.30 283Page 507 of 1002 S-095CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT APPLICATION Resident/BusinessPOLICE Review of an application for a concealed weapons permit to insure the public safety. New Application - $100 ($20 collected upon application and the balance collected if the license is issued.) Renewal - $25 Amended - $10 Live Scan - $33 per scan plus DOJ fees Psychological testing costs are to be added to the above fees up to $150 State background check fees are to be added to the above fees New Application - $1,505 Renewal - $25 Amended - $10 Live Scan - $42 per scan plus DOJ fees Psychological testing costs are to be added to the above fees State background check fees are to be added to the above fees 100% $100.00 $1,504.12 $(1,404.12) 25 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 6.65% $(35,103) $37,603 $2,500 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 284Page 508 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT S-095 25 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 1.00 $158.63 25 $3,966 POLICE POLICE CHIEF 0.17 $76.54 25 $1,914 POLICE POLICE LIEUTENANT 2.00 $732.68 25 $18,317 POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER 0.17 $21.77 25 $544 POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER Live Scan 0.33 $42.37 25 $1,059 POLICE PART TIME EMPLOYEES 6.00 $472.14 25 $11,804 $37,603 $1,504.13 9.67TYPE SUBTOTAL $37,603 9.67TOTALS $1,504.12 285Page 509 of 1002 S-096VERIFICATION/CLEARANCE FORM/LETTER APPLICATION Resident/BusinessPOLICE Investigate and prepare a clearance letter of local criminal history for individuals on request. $220 per letter $40 per letter 100% $220.00 $37.20 $182.80 25 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 591.40% $4,570 $930 $5,500 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 286Page 510 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE VERIFICATION/CLEARANCE FORM/LETTER S-096 25 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 0.17 $26.97 25 $674 POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER 0.08 $10.22 25 $256 $930 $37.19 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $930 0.25TOTALS $37.20 287Page 511 of 1002 S-097AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT APPLICATION Resident/BusinessPOLICE Review of a request for an amplified sound permit on public property. $207 per permit $150 per permit 100% $207.00 $150.46 $56.54 50 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 137.58% $2,827 $7,523 $10,350 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 288Page 512 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT S-097 50 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 0.33 $52.35 50 $2,618 POLICE POLICE CAPTAIN 0.17 $76.28 50 $3,814 POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER 0.17 $21.83 50 $1,092 $7,523 $150.46 0.67TYPE SUBTOTAL $7,523 0.67TOTALS $150.46 289Page 513 of 1002 S-098BLOCK PARTY PERMIT APPLICATION ResidentPOLICE Review of a request to close a street to have a neighborhood block party. $246 per permit $220 per permit 100% $246.00 $217.14 $28.86 22 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 113.29% $635 $4,777 $5,412 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 290Page 514 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BLOCK PARTY PERMIT S-098 22 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 0.75 $118.97 22 $2,617 POLICE POLICE CAPTAIN 0.17 $76.28 22 $1,678 POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER 0.17 $21.88 22 $481 $4,777 $217.13 1.09TYPE SUBTOTAL $4,777 1.09TOTALS $217.14 291Page 515 of 1002 S-100PRIVATE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION Business/Comm. GroupPOLICE Review and planning of a private special event in the public right-of-way. Event in the Public Right-of-Way - $703 per application Residential Private Event - $899 per application plus $500 deposit Event in the Public Right-of-Way - $755 per application Residential Private Event - $995 per application plus $500 deposit 100% $768.33 $834.00 $(65.67) 6 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 92.13% $(394) $5,004 $4,610 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 292Page 516 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PRIVATE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT S-100 6 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER 0.17 $22.04 6 $132 $132 $22.04 0.17TYPE SUBTOTAL POLICE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT Resid Priv Prop 1.50 $237.95 2 $476 POLICE POLICE LIEUTENANT Resid Priv Prop 2.00 $732.68 2 $1,465 $1,941 $970.63 3.50TYPE SUBTOTAL POLICE POLICE LIEUTENANT Public ROW Event 2.00 $732.68 4 $2,931 $2,931 $732.68 2.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $5,004 5.67TOTALS $834.00 293Page 517 of 1002 S-100ADRONE/UNMANNED AIRCRAFT PERMIT PERMIT BusinessPOLICE Review of a request to use a drone or unmanned aircraft within the City for compliance with City codes and standards. Initial Permit - $145 Annual Renewal - $75 $23 per permit 100% $145.00 $21.83 $123.17 12 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 664.12% $1,478 $262 $1,740 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 294Page 518 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DRONE/UNMANNED AIRCRAFT PERMIT S-100A 12 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER 0.17 $21.83 12 $262 $262 $21.83 0.17TYPE SUBTOTAL $262 0.17TOTALS $21.83 295Page 519 of 1002 S-101POLICE REPORT REPRODUCTION PAGE Resident/Non-ResidentPOLICE Providing a copy of a crime report, accident report, or other police documents on request. $0.20 per page/copy Fees are limited by the Public Records Act $0.20 per page 1% $0.20 $42.37 $(42.17) 500 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.47% $(21,085) $21,185 $100 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 296Page 520 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE POLICE REPORT REPRODUCTION S-101 500 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER 0.33 $42.37 500 $21,185 $21,185 $42.37 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL $21,185 0.33TOTALS $42.37 297Page 521 of 1002 S-102POLICE AUDIO/VIDEO/DVD COPY TAPE/DISK Resident/Non-ResidentPOLICE Reproduction of a video or audio tape or DVD on request. $18 per device Fees are limited by the Public Records Act $18 per device 20% $18.00 $128.40 $(110.40) 25 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 14.02% $(2,760) $3,210 $450 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 298Page 522 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE POLICE AUDIO/VIDEO/DVD COPY S-102 25 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER 1.00 $128.39 25 $3,210 $3,210 $128.39 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,210 1.00TOTALS $128.40 299Page 523 of 1002 S-103POLICE PHOTO REPRODUCTION PHOTO Resident/Non-ResidentPOLICE Providing copies of crime or accident photographs on request. $18 per photograph or disk/device Fees are limited by the Public Records Act $18 per photograph or disk/device 20% $18.00 $64.27 $(46.27) 15 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 28.01% $(694) $964 $270 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 300Page 524 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE POLICE PHOTO REPRODUCTION S-103 15 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER 0.50 $64.28 15 $964 $964 $64.28 0.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $964 0.50TOTALS $64.27 301Page 525 of 1002 S-103AFINGERPRINTING ON REQUEST SCAN Resident/BusinessPOLICE Providing fingerprinting services to the public on request. $33 per scan This fee should be removed as a separate fee. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 302Page 526 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE FINGERPRINTING ON REQUEST S-103A 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 303Page 527 of 1002 S-104ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES N/A Resident/BusinessPOLICE Control of animals within the City. Dog License: Spayed/Neutered - $27 Other - $112 Cat License: Spayed/Neutered - $14 Other - $36 Lost Tag - $6 Change Owner: Spayed Neutered - $14 Other - $36 Animal/Fowl Permit - $111 Animal/Fowl Appeal - $111 Dog License: Spayed/Neutered - $27 Other - $112 Cat License: Spayed/Neutered - $14 Other - $36 Lost Tag - $6 Change Owner: Spayed Neutered - $14 Other - $36 Animal/Fowl Permit - $111 Animal/Fowl Appeal - $111 25% $4.63 $189.09 $(184.46) 2,697 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 2.45% $(497,467) $509,967 $12,500 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 304Page 528 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES S-104 2,697 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMMUNITY SERVICES CMTY SRVC FIELD SUPV 3% Of 2 0.04 $6.53 2,697 $17,611 COMMUNITY SERVICES CMTY SRVC OFFICER 15% Of 12 1.12 $155.19 2,697 $418,547 COMMUNITY SERVICES PART TIME EMPLOYEES 3% 0.07 $3.77 2,697 $10,168 COMMUNITY SERVICES Contract Services 0.00 $3.22 2,697 $8,684 $455,011 $168.71 1.22TYPE SUBTOTAL REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK New 0.17 $26.31 89 $2,342 $2,342 $26.31 0.17TYPE SUBTOTAL REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Renew Processing 0.17 $26.31 1,102 $28,994 REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Renew Notices 0.08 $12.38 1,548 $19,164 $48,158 $38.69 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Unlicensed Dog Verif 0.08 $12.38 194 $2,402 $2,402 $12.38 0.08TYPE SUBTOTAL REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Rabies Early Exp Ltr 0.08 $12.38 166 $2,055 $2,055 $12.38 0.08TYPE SUBTOTAL $509,967 1.80TOTALS $189.09 305Page 529 of 1002 S-104ADOG LICENSE DUPLICATE DUPLICATE Resident/BusinessREVENUE SERVICES Issuance of a duplicate dog license on request $6 per duplicate $6 per duplicate 100% $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 150.00% $6 $12 $18 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 306Page 530 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DOG LICENSE DUPLICATE S-104A 3 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK 0.03 $4.13 3 $12 $12 $4.13 0.03TYPE SUBTOTAL $12 0.03TOTALS $4.00 307Page 531 of 1002 S-105ANIMAL RELEASE REDEMPTION RELEASE Resident/BusinessPOLICE Redemption of a stray animal if the animal is claimed before the animal is taken to the shelter. First Offense - $63 Second Offense - $141 Third and Subsequent Response - $237 First Offense - $65 Second Offense - $141 Third and Subsequent Response - $237 100% $63.00 $138.55 $(75.55) 20 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 45.47% $(1,511) $2,771 $1,260 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 308Page 532 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ANIMAL RELEASE REDEMPTION S-105 20 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMMUNITY SERVICES CMTY SRVC OFFICER 30 Min Of 2 1.00 $138.57 20 $2,771 $2,771 $138.57 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,771 1.00TOTALS $138.55 309Page 533 of 1002 S-106DECEASED ANIMAL PICK-UP REQUEST Resident/BusinessPOLICE Pick-up of a deceased animal on request. $74 per animal $90 per animal 100% $74.00 $93.00 $(19.00) 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 79.57% $(38) $186 $148 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 310Page 534 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DECEASED ANIMAL PICK-UP S-106 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMMUNITY SERVICES CMTY SRVC OFFICER 0.67 $92.84 2 $186 $186 $92.84 0.67TYPE SUBTOTAL $186 0.67TOTALS $93.00 311Page 535 of 1002 S-108PET HOME QUARANTINE REVIEW ANIMAL Resident/BusinessPOLICE Review and inspection of a home in which a pet is required to be quarantined. $74 per animal This fee should be removed from the fee schedule. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 312Page 536 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PET HOME QUARANTINE REVIEW S-108 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 313Page 537 of 1002 S-108ANON-HOUSEHOLD PET ANIMAL PERMIT APPLICATION Resident/BusinessPOLICE Review of a request to keep non-household pets within the City. $138 per application $365 per application 100% $138.00 $365.00 $(227.00) 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 37.81% $(454) $730 $276 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 314Page 538 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE NON-HOUSEHOLD PET ANIMAL PERMIT S-108A 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMMUNITY SERVICES CMTY SRVC FIELD SUPV 0.50 $87.40 2 $175 COMMUNITY SERVICES CMTY SRVC OFFICER 2.01 $277.83 2 $556 $730 $365.23 2.51TYPE SUBTOTAL $730 2.51TOTALS $365.00 315Page 539 of 1002 S-109MULTIPLE DOG/CAT REVIEW APPLICATION ResidentPOLICE Review of a request to keep more than the allowable number of dogs. $138 per application $365 per application 100% $138.00 $365.00 $(227.00) 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 37.81% $(454) $730 $276 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 316Page 540 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE MULTIPLE DOG/CAT REVIEW S-109 2 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMMUNITY SERVICES CMTY SRVC FIELD SUPV 0.50 $87.40 2 $175 COMMUNITY SERVICES CMTY SRVC OFFICER 2.01 $277.83 2 $556 $730 $365.23 2.51TYPE SUBTOTAL $730 2.51TOTALS $365.00 317Page 541 of 1002 S-109AJAIL SERVICES DAY Resident/Non-ResidentPOLICE Providing pay-to-stay jail services when individuals are required by the courts to spend a certain amount of days in jail. $331 per day This fee should be removed from the fee schedule. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 318Page 542 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE JAIL SERVICES S-109A 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 319Page 543 of 1002 S-120OPEN FIRE PERMIT PERMIT Resident/Non-ResidentCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Review of a request for an open fire at a City park. $28 per permit $28 per permit 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 39 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 320Page 544 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE OPEN FIRE PERMIT S-120 39 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 321Page 545 of 1002 S-122AMBULANCE RESPONSE - BLS/ALS RESPONSE Resident/Non-ResidentFIRE Ambulance transport with basic and advanced life support. Charge the maximum allowable county rates as calculated by the Los Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency. Charge the maximum allowable county rates as calculated by the Los Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency. 10% $802.25 $502.63 $299.62 831 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 159.61% $248,982 $417,686 $666,668 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 322Page 546 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE AMBULANCE RESPONSE - BLS/ALS S-122 831 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY MANAGER Ambulance Services 0.00 $450.18 831 $374,100 FINANCE ADMIN ASSISTANT 2 Hrs/Month 0.03 $3.12 831 $2,593 FINANCE Billing Services 0.00 $49.33 831 $40,993 $417,686 $502.63 0.03TYPE SUBTOTAL $417,686 0.03TOTALS $502.63 323Page 547 of 1002 S-123ASPECIAL EVENT SECURITY HOURPOLICE Police providing public safety service at special event. $144 per hour per officer This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as additional security is already added in contracts. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 324Page 548 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY S-123A 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 325Page 549 of 1002 S-123BPOLICE WITNESS SERVICES DAYPOLICE Providing a police officer as a witness at a civil trial. $326 per day Fees are set by State Government Code section 28096.1 $275 per day 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 326Page 550 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE POLICE WITNESS SERVICES S-123B 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 327Page 551 of 1002 S-125ADAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY OCCURENCE Resident/Non-ResidentPUBLIC WORKS Repair of damage to City property. Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel used plus any outside costs. Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel used plus any outside costs. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 328Page 552 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY S-125A 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 329Page 553 of 1002 S-126AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM PARTICIPANT Resident/Non-ResidentCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Providing the Afterschool Program to the community. 3 Day Program - $1,200 per year 5 Day Program - $1,900 per year 3 Day Program - $1,200 per year 5 Day Program - $1,900 per year 100% $1,900.00 $5,069.68 $(3,169.68) 60 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 37.48% $(190,181) $304,181 $114,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 330Page 554 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM S-126 60 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM. RESOURCES COMM RESOURCES DIR 1% 0.28 $109.26 60 $6,556 COMM. RESOURCES PART TIME EMPLOYEES $66,505 57.59 $3,403.23 60 $204,194 COMM. RESOURCES RECREATION COORD 30% Of Nick 8.39 $1,473.87 60 $88,432 COMM. RESOURCES Contract/Materials 0.00 $83.33 60 $5,000 $304,181 $5,069.69 66.26TYPE SUBTOTAL $304,181 66.26TOTALS $5,069.68 331Page 555 of 1002 S-126ASUMMER CAMP PROGRAM PARTICIPANT Resident/Non-ResidentCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Providing the Summer Camp program to the community. Resident - $185 per week Non-Resident - $195 per week Resident - $185 per week Non-Resident - $195 per week 65% $162.28 $562.17 $(399.89) 562 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 28.87% $(224,740) $315,940 $91,200 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 332Page 556 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SUMMER CAMP PROGRAM S-126A 562 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM. RESOURCES COMM RESOURCES DIR 1% 0.03 $11.66 562 $6,553 COMM. RESOURCES PART TIME EMPLOYEES $66,505 6.15 $363.33 562 $204,191 COMM. RESOURCES RECREATION COORD 25% Of Nick 0.75 $131.13 562 $73,695 COMM. RESOURCES Contract/Materials 0.00 $20.46 562 $11,499 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION Contract Svcs 0.00 $35.59 562 $20,002 $315,940 $562.17 6.93TYPE SUBTOTAL $315,940 6.93TOTALS $562.17 333Page 557 of 1002 S-127RECREATION CLASSES PARTICIPANT Resident/Non-ResidentCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Providing recreation classes to the community. Various fees depending on the class: Refund Transaction - $16 Non-Resident Rate: $0-$99 class fee - $5 $100+ class fee - $10 Administrative Fee - 10% of class fee Various fees depending on the class: Refund Transaction - $16 Non-Resident Rate: $0-$99 class fee - $5 $100+ class fee - $10 Administrative Fee - 10% of class fee 100% $162.72 $196.71 $(33.99) 4,302 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 82.72% $(146,246) $846,246 $700,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 334Page 558 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE RECREATION CLASSES S-127 4,302 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM. RESOURCES COMM RESOURCES DIR 1% 0.00 $1.52 4,302 $6,539 COMM. RESOURCES OFFICE ASSISTANT 2% 0.01 $0.97 4,302 $4,173 COMM. RESOURCES PART TIME EMPLOYEES $10,176 0.12 $7.26 4,302 $31,233 COMM. RESOURCES RECREATION COORD 30% Of Kambria 0.12 $20.56 4,302 $88,449 COMM. RESOURCES RECREATION SPEC 10% 0.04 $3.39 4,302 $14,584 COMM. RESOURCES Class Instructors 0.00 $113.90 4,302 $489,998 COMM. RESOURCES Facility Maintenance 0.00 $15.38 4,302 $66,165 COMM. RESOURCES Active.Net 0.00 $23.25 4,302 $100,022 COMM. RESOURCES Facility Replacement 0.00 $10.48 4,302 $45,085 $846,246 $196.71 0.29TYPE SUBTOTAL $846,246 0.29TOTALS $196.71 335Page 559 of 1002 S-128SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT N/A Business/Comm. GroupCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Coordinating privately-run special events that are provided to the public in the public right-of-way. Commercial Application Fee - $1,057 Commercial Category I - 70/30 revenue split with the City receiving 30% Commercial Category II - $3,362 Commercial Category III - $3,700 Commercial Category IV - $6,727 Non-Profit - $704 application fee plus $2 per participant Co-Sponsor - $356 per sponsor Set Up - $319 per day Tear Down - $319 per day Event Supervisor - $423 per day City Pass Thru - $353 application fee Commercial Application Fee - $1,057 Commercial Category I - 70/30 revenue split with the City receiving 30% Commercial Category II - $3,362 Commercial Category III - $3,700 Commercial Category IV - $6,727 Non-Profit - $704 application fee plus $2 per participant Co-Sponsor - $356 per sponsor Set Up - $319 per day Tear Down - $319 per day Event Supervisor - $423 per day City Pass Thru - $353 application fee Late Application: Commercial - $2,056 Non-Profit - $1,370 35% $666.67 $4,509.96 $(3,843.29) 90 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 14.78% $(345,896) $405,896 $60,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 336Page 560 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT S-128 90 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM. RESOURCES COMM RESOURCES DIR 33% 6.15 $2,403.72 90 $216,335 COMM. RESOURCES PART TIME EMPLOYEES $10,176 5.88 $347.17 90 $31,245 COMM. RESOURCES SR RECREATION SUPV 40% 7.46 $1,759.07 90 $158,316 $405,896 $4,509.96 19.49TYPE SUBTOTAL $405,896 19.49TOTALS $4,509.96 337Page 561 of 1002 S-128ALONG-TERM SPEC EVENT AGREEMENT APPLICATIONCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Processing and review of a long-term agreement for a private special event. None Multi-Year Agreement: Commercial - $1,902 Non-Profit - $1,141 35% $0.00 $8,784.00 $(8,784.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(8,784) $8,784 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 338Page 562 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE LONG-TERM SPEC EVENT AGREEMENT S-128A 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM. RESOURCES RECREATION COORD Multiple Years 50.00 $8,783.50 1 $8,784 $8,784 $8,783.50 50.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $8,784 50.00TOTALS $8,784.00 339Page 563 of 1002 S-128BSPEC EVENT RESERVED PARKING STAGING EVENTCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Preparing and posting Reserved Parking signs needed for a private special event. None $207 per event 35% $0.00 $542.00 $(542.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(542) $542 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 340Page 564 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SPEC EVENT RESERVED PARKING STAGING S-128B 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM. RESOURCES PART TIME EMPLOYEES 2.99 $176.68 1 $177 COMM. RESOURCES RECREATION COORD 2.00 $351.34 1 $351 COMM. RESOURCES Sign Costs 0.00 $14.00 1 $14 $542 $542.02 4.99TYPE SUBTOTAL $542 4.99TOTALS $542.00 341Page 565 of 1002 S-128CSPECIAL EVENT PUBLIC HEARING HEARINGCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Processing of a public hearing required for all new private special events. None $38 per hearing plus actual publication costs 35% $0.00 $176.00 $(176.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(176) $176 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 342Page 566 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SPECIAL EVENT PUBLIC HEARING S-128C 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM. RESOURCES RECREATION COORD 1.00 $175.67 1 $176 $176 $175.67 1.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $176 1.00TOTALS $176.00 343Page 567 of 1002 S-128DSPECIAL EVENT MODIFICATION APPLICATIONCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Processing and review of a modification to an existing special event application. None $114 per application 35% $0.00 $527.00 $(527.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(527) $527 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 344Page 568 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE SPECIAL EVENT MODIFICATION S-128D 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM. RESOURCES RECREATION COORD 3.00 $527.01 1 $527 $527 $527.01 3.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $527 3.00TOTALS $527.00 345Page 569 of 1002 S-129EXCURSIONS PARTICIPANT Resident/Non-ResidentCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Providing excursions to the community. Various fees depending on the excursion that recover the direct cost of the excursion. Various fees depending on the excursion that recover the direct cost of the excursion. 100% $0.00 $227.46 $(227.46) 344 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $(78,246) $78,246 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 346Page 570 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE EXCURSIONS S-129 344 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM. RESOURCES PART TIME EMPLOYEES $10,176 1.54 $90.83 344 $31,246 COMM. RESOURCES Contract/Materials 0.00 $61.05 344 $21,001 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION Conract Svcs 0.00 $75.58 344 $26,000 $78,246 $227.46 1.54TYPE SUBTOTAL $78,246 1.54TOTALS $227.46 347Page 571 of 1002 S-130THEATER SERVICES N/A Comm. GroupCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Providing the theater to the community. Application Fee: Theater - $100 Second Story Theater - $27 Various fees depending on the theater, type of performance, and staff and equipment use Application Fee: Theater - $100 Second Story Theater - $26 Various fees depending on the theater, type of performance, and staff and equipment use 100% $90,000.00 $586,742.00 $(496,742.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 15.34% $(496,742) $586,742 $90,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 348Page 572 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE THEATER SERVICES S-130 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM. RESOURCES COMM RESOURCES DIR 1% 16.78 $6,555.61 1 $6,556 COMM. RESOURCES PART TIME EMPLOYEES $62,102 3,221.80 $190,376.16 1 $190,376 COMM. RESOURCES SR RECREATION SUPV 17% 285.26 $67,284.28 1 $67,284 COMM. RESOURCES Contract/Materials 0.00 $3,375.00 1 $3,375 COMM. RESOURCES Facility Replacement 0.00 $129,350.00 1 $129,350 COMM. RESOURCES Facility Maint 0.00 $189,801.00 1 $189,801 $586,742 $586,742.05 3,523.84TYPE SUBTOTAL $586,742 3,523.84TOTALS $586,742.00 349Page 573 of 1002 S-131RECREATION FACILITY RENTALS RENTAL Resident/Non-ResidentCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Rental of the Community Center, Clark Building, Tennis Courts, Pier Plaza, Valley Park, and South Park. Application Fee - $28 Recreation Facilities - Various fees depending on the room and group Tennis/Pickleball Courts (Residents only): Instructor/Pro (no lights) - $18 per hour Resident Reservation - $9 per hour All Lighted Hours - $11 per hour $22 per hour (Instructor) Gymnasium: Commercial - $71/hr Non-Profit - $33/hr $140 deposit Pier Plaza: $423 per day staff fee plus $14,081 per day for Comm. Rentals Outdoor Fitness Permit - $130 per month with a $127 annual fee Application Fee - $28 Recreation Facilities - Various fees depending on the room and group Tennis/Pickleball Courts (Residents only): Instructor/Pro (no lights) - $18 per hour Resident Reservation - $9 per hour All Lighted Hours - $11 per hour $22 per hour (Instructor) Gymnasium: Commercial - $71/hr Non-Profit - $33/hr $140 deposit Pier Plaza: $423 per day staff fee plus $14,081 per day for Comm. Rentals Outdoor Fitness Permit - $130 per month with a $127 annual fee 100% $1,480.45 $1,161.06 $319.39 179 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 127.51% $57,171 $207,829 $265,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 350Page 574 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE RECREATION FACILITY RENTALS S-131 179 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM. RESOURCES OFFICE ASSISTANT 15% 1.41 $174.18 179 $31,178 COMM. RESOURCES PART TIME EMPLOYEES $10,176 2.95 $174.55 179 $31,244 COMM. RESOURCES RECREATION COORD 16% Of Kambria 1.50 $263.49 179 $47,165 COMM. RESOURCES Facility Replacement 0.00 $133.44 179 $23,886 COMM. RESOURCES Lease Facil Maint 0.00 $108.82 179 $19,479 COMM. RESOURCES Facility Maintenance 0.00 $195.79 179 $35,046 COMM. RESOURCES Lease Facil Replace 0.00 $74.16 179 $13,275 $201,273 $1,124.43 5.86TYPE SUBTOTAL COMM. RESOURCES COMM RESOURCES DIR 1% 16.78 $6,555.61 1 $6,556 $6,556 $6,555.61 16.78TYPE SUBTOTAL $207,829 22.64TOTALS $1,161.06 351Page 575 of 1002 S-132BALLFIELD RENTALS RENTAL Resident/Comm. GroupCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Rental of ballfields to the community. Field Use - $11 per hour Lighted Fields (7-10 pm) - $25 per hour Field Use - $11 per hour Lighted Fields (7-10 pm) - $25 per hour 100% $2,600.00 $22,155.00 $(19,555.00) 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 11.74% $(97,775) $110,775 $13,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 352Page 576 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BALLFIELD RENTALS S-132 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST COMM. RESOURCES COMM RESOURCES DIR 1% 3.36 $1,311.12 5 $6,556 COMM. RESOURCES OFFICE ASSISTANT 4% 13.42 $1,662.83 5 $8,314 COMM. RESOURCES PART TIME EMPLOYEES $10,176 105.75 $6,249.00 5 $31,245 COMM. RESOURCES RECREATION COORD 15% Of Nick 50.34 $8,843.23 5 $44,216 COMM. RESOURCES RECREATION SPEC 5% 16.78 $1,459.19 5 $7,296 COMM. RESOURCES AYSO Field Maint 0.00 $1,196.40 5 $5,982 COMM. RESOURCES Little League 0.00 $907.40 5 $4,537 COMM. RESOURCES Field Maint 0.00 $525.80 5 $2,629 $110,775 $22,154.97 189.65TYPE SUBTOTAL $110,775 189.65TOTALS $22,155.00 353Page 577 of 1002 S-133FILM PERMIT APPLICATION BusinessCOMMUNITY RESOURCES Processing a request to film in the public right-of-way. Filming: Application/Permit Fee - $672 Student Application Fee - $130 Location Fee - $1,569-$3,520 per location per day Film Prep or Strike Fee - $140-$1,394 per location per day Still Photography: Application Fee - $281 Location Fee: First Location - $272 Each Additional Location - $140 Parking Meter - $27 Filming: Application/Permit Fee - $672 Student Application Fee - $130 Location Fee - $1,569-$3,520 per location per day Film Prep or Strike Fee - $140-$1,394 per location per day Still Photography: Application Fee - $281 Location Fee: First Location - $272 Each Additional Location - $140 Parking Meter - $27 100% $1,400.00 $1,145.40 $254.60 25 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 122.23% $6,365 $28,635 $35,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 354Page 578 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE FILM PERMIT S-133 25 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST POLICE POLICE LIEUTENANT 0.25 $91.59 25 $2,290 COMM. RESOURCES COMM RESOURCES DIR 0.67 $262.22 25 $6,556 COMM. RESOURCES SR RECREATION SUPV 5% 3.36 $791.58 25 $19,790 $28,635 $1,145.39 4.28TYPE SUBTOTAL $28,635 4.28TOTALS $1,145.40 355Page 579 of 1002 S-134BANNER HANGING BANNER Comm. GroupPUBLIC WORKS Hanging a banner in the public right-of-way. City Install - $762 per banner Outside Contractor - $69 per banner plus contractor costs City Installs - $560 per banner Outside Contractor - $69 per banner plus contractor costs 100% $83.44 $69.67 $13.77 48 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 119.77% $661 $3,344 $4,005 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 356Page 580 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BANNER HANGING S-134 48 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ENGINEERING TECH Contractor 0.50 $59.25 47 $2,785 $2,785 $59.25 0.50TYPE SUBTOTAL STREET MAINT/TRAFF.MAINT. WORKER II City - 3 Hrs Of 2 6.00 $501.24 1 $501 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN SR OFFICE ASSISTANT City 0.50 $58.07 1 $58 $559 $559.31 6.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $3,344 7.00TOTALS $69.67 357Page 581 of 1002 S-136PARKING PERMIT PROCESSING PERMIT ResidentREVENUE SERVICES Processing a parking permit. Annual - $60 - 3 per yr/per residence - ($30 half year) Replacement - $3 Annual Employees - $175 Monthly Employees Lot C (Daily) - $38, (24 Hour) - $75 Monthly Lot Permit (Daily) - $150, (24 Hour) - $250 Daily - $12 Driveway - $170 (MOVED TO PUBLIC WORKS) Contractor - $42 Oversized Vehicle - $54 Annual Reg, max of 9 guest permits annually or 96 permits fo residents (no cost) Annual - $60 - 3 per yr/per residence - ($30 half year) Replacement - $3 Annual Employees - $175 Monthly Employees Lot C (Daily) - $38, (24 Hour) - $75 Monthly Lot Permit (Daily) - $150, (24 Hour) - $250 Daily - $12 Driveway - (MOVED TO PUBLIC WORKS) Contractor - $42 Oversized Vehicle - $54 Annual Reg, max of 9 guest permits annually or 96 permits fo residents (no cost) 100% $20.97 $23.28 $(2.31) 15,501 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 90.04% $(35,940) $360,940 $325,000 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 358Page 582 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PARKING PERMIT PROCESSING S-136 15,501 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Residential Process 0.33 $51.08 4,422 $225,876 REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Residential Notices 0.05 $8.06 5,410 $43,605 $269,480 $59.14 0.38TYPE SUBTOTAL REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Contractor 0.17 $26.31 896 $23,574 $23,574 $26.31 0.17TYPE SUBTOTAL REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Daily 0.05 $7.74 426 $3,297 $3,297 $7.74 0.05TYPE SUBTOTAL REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Employee Parking 0.33 $51.08 231 $11,799 $11,799 $51.08 0.33TYPE SUBTOTAL REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Oversized Vehicle 0.25 $38.70 13 $503 POLICE POLICE SRVC OFFICER Oversize Each Use 0.50 $64.10 13 $833 $1,336 $102.80 0.75TYPE SUBTOTAL REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Duplicate 0.25 $38.70 25 $968 $968 $38.70 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Monthly 24 Hr 0.08 $12.38 36 $446 $446 $12.38 0.08TYPE SUBTOTAL REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Monthly Daily 0.08 $12.38 4,042 $50,040 $50,040 $12.38 0.08TYPE SUBTOTAL $360,940 2.09TOTALS $23.28 359Page 583 of 1002 S-138PARKING LOT MONTHLY PASS PASS Resident/Non-ResidentREVENUE SERVICES Processing a parking lot monthly pass which allows for parking up to 72 hours at one time. Processing fee - $7 (in addition to parking rates) Not currently charging this fee This fee should be removed from the fee schedule. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 360Page 584 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE PARKING LOT MONTHLY PASS S-138 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 361Page 585 of 1002 S-139DAILY PARKING LOT PROCESSING PERMIT Resident/Non-ResidentREVENUE SERVICES Processing a parking lot daily pass which is valid for one month but only allows parking for up to one day at a time. Processing fee - $7 (in addition to parking rates) Not currently charging this fee This fee should be removed from the fee schedule. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 362Page 586 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DAILY PARKING LOT PROCESSING S-139 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 363Page 587 of 1002 S-139AREFUSE LIEN PROCESSING LIENFINANCE Placement of a lien for non-payment of refuse bills. $14 per lien $21 per lien 100% $14.00 $20.86 $(6.86) 114 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 67.12% $(782) $2,378 $1,596 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 364Page 588 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE REFUSE LIEN PROCESSING S-139A 114 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY MANAGER ENVIRON PROG MANAGER 10 Hrs/Year 0.09 $18.78 114 $2,141 FINANCE ACCOUNTANT 2 Hrs/Year 0.02 $2.08 114 $237 $2,378 $20.86 0.11TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,378 0.11TOTALS $20.86 365Page 589 of 1002 S-139BCOMPOSTING/WORM BIN PROCESSING BIN ResidentENVIRON. SERVICES Providing composting and worm bins to the community. Compost Bin - $35 per bin Worm Bin - $70 per bin These fees charged at actual cost and are managed by the Environmental Programs Manager Compost Bin - $35 per bin Worm Bin - $70 per bin These fees charged at actual cost and are managed by the Environmental Programs Manager 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 366Page 590 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE COMPOSTING/WORM BIN PROCESSING S-139B 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 367Page 591 of 1002 S-140GARAGE SALE PERMIT PERMIT ResidentREVENUE SERVICES Processing a garage sale permit. $8 per permit $8 per permit 100% $8.00 $7.71 $0.29 14 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 103.70% $4 $108 $112 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 368Page 592 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE GARAGE SALE PERMIT S-140 14 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK 0.05 $7.74 14 $108 $108 $7.74 0.05TYPE SUBTOTAL $108 0.05TOTALS $7.71 369Page 593 of 1002 S-142NSF CHECK PROCESSING NSF CHECK Resident/Non-Resident/BusinessFINANCE Processing a check returned for insufficient funds. $61 per NSF check $63 per NSF check 100% $61.00 $63.23 $(2.23) 31 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 96.48% $(69) $1,960 $1,891 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 370Page 594 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE NSF CHECK PROCESSING S-142 31 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST FINANCE ACCOUNTANT 0.50 $59.24 31 $1,836 FINANCE Bank Charge 0.00 $4.00 31 $124 $1,960 $63.24 0.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,960 0.50TOTALS $63.23 371Page 595 of 1002 S-143DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION COPY Resident/Non-ResidentCITY CLERK Reproduction of documents on request. $0.20 per copy FPPC-related copies - $0.10 per copy Mailing - $3 Fees are limited by the Public Records Act. $0.20 per copy FPPC-related copies - $0.10 per copy Mailing - $3 100% $0.20 $1.27 $(1.07) 250 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 15.72% $(268) $318 $50 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 372Page 596 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION S-143 250 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY CLERK DEP CITY CLERK 0.01 $1.27 250 $318 $318 $1.27 0.01TYPE SUBTOTAL $318 0.01TOTALS $1.27 373Page 597 of 1002 S-143AELECTRONIC FILE COPY DEVICE Resident/Non-ResidentCITY CLERK Providing copies of electronic public files on request. $5 per device Fees are limited by the Public Records Act. $5 per device 100% $5.00 $3.00 $2.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 166.67% $2 $3 $5 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 374Page 598 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE ELECTRONIC FILE COPY S-143A 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY CLERK DEP CITY CLERK 0.02 $2.55 1 $3 $3 $2.55 0.02TYPE SUBTOTAL $3 0.02TOTALS $3.00 375Page 599 of 1002 S-144DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION DOCUMENT Resident/Non-ResidentCITY CLERK Certifying that a City document is a true copy. $3 per document $4 per document 100% $3.00 $3.80 $(0.80) 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 78.95% $(4) $19 $15 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 376Page 600 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION S-144 5 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY CLERK DEP CITY CLERK 0.03 $3.82 5 $19 $19 $3.82 0.03TYPE SUBTOTAL $19 0.03TOTALS $3.80 377Page 601 of 1002 S-145APPEAL TO COUNCIL FROM PW STAFF APPEAL Developer/Resident/BusinessCITY CLERK Processing an appeal of a Public Works staff decision to the City Council. $3,319 per appeal plus noticing costs and poster/advertising costs $2,865 per appeal plus noticing costs and poster/advertising costs 100% $3,319.00 $2,864.00 $455.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 115.89% $455 $2,864 $3,319 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 378Page 602 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE APPEAL TO COUNCIL FROM PW STAFF S-145 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY CLERK DEP CITY CLERK + Mail/Ad Costs 2.00 $254.56 1 $255 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 7.50 $1,448.10 1 $1,448 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1.50 $251.03 1 $251 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 2.50 $910.03 1 $910 $2,864 $2,863.72 13.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $2,864 13.50TOTALS $2,864.00 379Page 603 of 1002 S-147INTITATIVE PROCESSING INITIATIVE ResidentCITY CLERK Processing and filing of City initiative filing papers. $200 per initiative Fee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition. This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 9202(b)). $200 per initiative Fee is to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition. This is the maximum allowed under State law (Elections Code section 9202(b)). 15% $200.00 $1,510.00 $(1,310.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 13.25% $(1,310) $1,510 $200 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 380Page 604 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE INTITATIVE PROCESSING S-147 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY CLERK CITY CLERK 6.00 $1,255.74 1 $1,256 CITY CLERK DEP CITY CLERK 2.00 $254.56 1 $255 $1,510 $1,510.30 8.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,510 8.00TOTALS $1,510.00 381Page 605 of 1002 S-150NEW BUSINESS REGISTRATION PROCESS APPLICATION BusinessREVENUE SERVICES Processing new business registration applications. In-City - $43 Out-of-City - $26 In-City - $75 Out-of-City - $30 100% $31.35 $42.38 $(11.03) 426 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 73.97% $(4,700) $18,054 $13,354 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 382Page 606 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE NEW BUSINESS REGISTRATION PROCESS S-150 426 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK In-City 0.50 $77.40 134 $10,372 $10,372 $77.40 0.50TYPE SUBTOTAL REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Out Of City 0.17 $26.31 292 $7,683 $7,683 $26.31 0.17TYPE SUBTOTAL $18,054 0.67TOTALS $42.38 383Page 607 of 1002 S-151BUSINESS REGISTRATION RENEWAL RENEWAL BusinessREVENUE SERVICES Processing the annual renewal of business registrations for existing businesses. $22 per renewal $40 per renewal 100% $22.00 $39.57 $(17.57) 2,717 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 55.60% $(47,738) $107,512 $59,774 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 384Page 608 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BUSINESS REGISTRATION RENEWAL S-151 2,717 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK 1 Hr/Month 0.00 $0.69 2,717 $1,875 REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK Input 0.25 $38.70 2,717 $105,148 REVENUE SVCS Authorize.Net 0.00 $0.18 2,717 $489 $107,512 $39.57 0.25TYPE SUBTOTAL $107,512 0.25TOTALS $39.57 385Page 609 of 1002 S-152BUSINESS LICENSE DUPLICATE DUPLICATE BusinessREVENUE SERVICES Providing a duplicate of a business license on request. $9 per duplicate This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the service is now performed electronically. 100% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 0.00% $0 $0 $0 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 386Page 610 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE DUPLICATE S-152 0 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK 0 Unit 0.00 $0.00 0 $0 $0 $0.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $0 0.00TOTALS $0.00 387Page 611 of 1002 S-153CREDIT CARD PROCESSING N/A Developer/Resident/BusinessREVENUE SERVICES Processing of credit card processing fees. 2.75% of the amount charged 2.5% of the amount charged (minimum $1) 100% $106,052.00 $90,000.00 $16,052.00 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 117.84% $16,052 $90,000 $106,052 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 388Page 612 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CREDIT CARD PROCESSING S-153 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST REVENUE SVCS Bank Fees 0.00 $90,000.00 1 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000.00 0.00TYPE SUBTOTAL $90,000 0.00TOTALS $90,000.00 389Page 613 of 1002 S-154CANNABIS DELIVERY PERMIT APPLICATIONADMINISTRATION Review of a proposed new Cannabis Delivery business located within the City for compliance with City codes and standards. $702 per application $1,070 per application 100% $702.00 $1,069.00 $(367.00) 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKSHEET SERVICE REFERENCE NO. PRIMARY DEPARTMENT UNIT OF SERVICE SERVICE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON UNIT REVENUE: UNIT COST: UNIT PROFIT (SUBSIDY): TOTAL UNITS: TOTAL REVENUE: TOTAL COST: TOTAL PROFIT (SUBSIDY): PCT. COST RECOVERY: 65.67% $(367) $1,069 $702 SUGGESTED FEE FOR COST RECOVERY OF: April 16, 2025 390Page 614 of 1002 April 16, 2025 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FY 2024-2025 COST DETAIL WORKSHEET SERVICE CANNABIS DELIVERY PERMIT S-154 1 REFERENCE NO. TOTAL UNITSNOTE Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units DEPARTMENT POSITION TYPE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST CITY MANAGER CITY MANAGER 1.00 $417.50 1 $418 CITY MANAGER DEPUTY CITY MANAGER 1.50 $405.96 1 $406 REVENUE SVCS ACCOUNT CLERK 0.50 $77.40 1 $77 PLANNING COM DEV DIRECTOR 0.50 $168.13 1 $168 $1,069 $1,068.99 3.50TYPE SUBTOTAL $1,069 3.50TOTALS $1,069.00 391Page 615 of 1002 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 392Page 616 of 1002 APPENDIX C DETAIL OF BUILDING & SAFETY FEES 393Page 617 of 1002 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 394Page 618 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHBUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULECONSOLIDATED NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEESFY 24-25BASEADD'LBASEADD'LBASEADD'LUBCPLAN CHKCOST PERINSPECT.COST PERPC/INSPCOST PERGROUPDESCRIPTIONSQ FTCOST100 SQ FTCOST100 SQ FTCOST100 SQ FTAASSEMBLY, NEW1,000$929$56.79$1,648$109.87$2,577$166.675c2,000$1,497$1.72$2,747$71.94$4,244$73.665,000$1,549$6.20$4,905$39.24$6,454$45.4410,000$1,859$4.65$6,867$13.73$8,726$18.3820,000$2,323$3.10$8,240$7.85$10,564$10.9550,000$3,253$3.10$10,595$7.85$13,848$10.95AASSEMBLY500$586$39.05$635$76.15$1,220$115.19RENOVATION1,000$781$16.27$1,015$39.48$1,796$55.75STRUCTURAL2,000$944$1.08$1,410$36.93$2,354$38.025b5,000$976$3.90$2,518$20.15$3,494$24.0510,000$1,171$2.93$3,525$7.05$4,697$9.9820,000$1,464$1.95$4,230$4.03$5,695$5.9850,000$2,050$1.95$5,439$4.03$7,489$5.98AASSEMBLY500$419$27.96$561$67.29$980$95.25RENOVATION1,000$559$11.65$897$34.89$1,456$46.54NON-STRUCTURAL2,000$676$0.78$1,246$32.64$1,922$33.425a5,000$699$2.80$2,225$17.80$2,924$20.6010,000$839$2.10$3,115$6.23$3,954$8.3320,000$1,049$1.40$3,739$3.56$4,787$4.9650,000$1,468$1.40$4,807$3.56$6,275$4.96MCOMMERCIAL, NEW1,000$965$51.46$1,400$139.98$2,365$191.4313a2,000$1,479$2.14$2,800$46.66$4,279$48.805,000$1,544$5.15$4,199$16.80$5,743$21.9410,000$1,801$4.50$5,039$16.80$6,840$21.3020,000$2,251$1.07$6,719$3.73$8,970$4.8050,000$2,573$0.64$7,839$2.80$10,412$3.44100,000$2,894$0.64$9,238$2.80$12,133$3.44PLAN CHECKINSPECTIONPLAN CHECK & INSPECTION395Page 619 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHBUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULECONSOLIDATED NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEESFY 24-25BASEADD'LBASEADD'LBASEADD'LUBCPLAN CHKCOST PERINSPECT.COST PERPC/INSPCOST PERGROUPDESCRIPTIONSQ FTCOST100 SQ FTCOST100 SQ FTCOST100 SQ FTPLAN CHECKINSPECTIONPLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONMCOMMERCIAL1,000$473$25.22$722$72.17$1,195$97.39NON-TI, CORE, SHELL2,000$725$1.05$1,443$24.06$2,168$25.11135,000$757$2.52$2,165$8.66$2,922$11.1810,000$883$2.21$2,598$8.66$3,481$10.8720,000$1,103$0.53$3,464$1.92$4,568$2.4550,000$1,261$0.32$4,042$1.44$5,302$1.76100,000$1,418$0.32$4,763$1.44$6,182$1.76MCHANGE OF USE/1,000$710$37.89$1,039$103.85$1,749$141.74CONVERSION2,000$1,089$1.58$2,077$34.62$3,166$36.2013b5,000$1,137$3.79$3,116$12.46$4,252$16.2510,000$1,326$3.32$3,739$12.46$5,065$15.7820,000$1,658$0.79$4,985$2.77$6,643$3.5650,000$1,895$0.47$5,816$2.08$7,710$2.55100,000$2,131$0.47$6,854$2.08$8,986$2.55MCOMMERCIAL, TI500$949$63.25$1,184$142.07$2,133$205.33STRUCTURAL1,000$1,265$26.36$1,894$73.67$3,159$100.03462,000$1,529$1.76$2,631$68.91$4,160$70.675,000$1,581$6.33$4,698$37.59$6,280$43.9110,000$1,898$4.74$6,578$13.16$8,475$17.9020,000$2,372$3.16$7,893$7.52$10,265$10.6850,000$3,321$3.16$10,148$7.52$13,469$10.68MCOMMERCIAL, TI500$707$47.12$956$114.76$1,663$161.88NON-STRUCTURAL1,000$942$19.63$1,530$59.51$2,473$79.14432,000$1,139$1.31$2,125$55.66$3,264$56.975,000$1,178$4.71$3,795$30.36$4,973$35.0710,000$1,413$3.53$5,313$10.63$6,727$14.1620,000$1,767$2.36$6,376$6.07$8,143$8.4350,000$2,474$2.36$8,198$6.07$10,671$8.43396Page 620 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHBUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULECONSOLIDATED NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEESFY 24-25BASEADD'LBASEADD'LBASEADD'LUBCPLAN CHKCOST PERINSPECT.COST PERPC/INSPCOST PERGROUPDESCRIPTIONSQ FTCOST100 SQ FTCOST100 SQ FTCOST100 SQ FTPLAN CHECKINSPECTIONPLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONR-1HOTEL/LODGING1,000$1,163$16.43$1,725$37.71$2,888$54.14NEW5,000$1,820$1.01$3,233$43.13$5,053$44.1422d10,000$1,871$3.54$5,389$21.56$7,260$25.1020,000$2,225$1.85$7,545$5.03$9,770$6.8850,000$2,781$2.33$9,054$5.17$11,835$7.50100,000$3,944$2.33$11,641$5.17$15,585$7.50R-1HOTEL/LODGING1,000$478$6.76$723$15.80$1,201$22.56EXTERIOR5,000$749$0.42$1,355$18.07$2,103$18.4922c10,000$769$1.46$2,258$9.03$3,027$10.4920,000$915$0.76$3,161$2.11$4,076$2.8750,000$1,144$0.96$3,793$2.17$4,937$3.12100,000$1,622$0.96$4,877$2.17$6,499$3.12R-1HOTEL/LODGING500$707$47.12$805$96.55$1,511$143.67RENOVATION1,000$942$19.63$1,287$50.06$2,230$69.70STRUCTURAL2,000$1,139$1.31$1,788$46.83$2,927$48.1422b5,000$1,178$4.71$3,193$25.54$4,371$30.2610,000$1,413$3.53$4,470$8.94$5,884$12.4720,000$1,767$2.36$5,364$5.11$7,131$7.4650,000$2,474$2.36$6,897$5.11$9,370$7.46R-1HOTEL/LODGING500$540$36.03$675$80.95$1,215$116.98RENOVATION1,000$721$15.01$1,079$41.97$1,800$56.99NON-STRUCTURAL2,000$871$1.00$1,499$39.26$2,370$40.2622a5,000$901$3.60$2,677$21.42$3,578$25.0210,000$1,081$2.70$3,748$7.50$4,829$10.2020,000$1,351$1.80$4,497$4.28$5,848$6.0850,000$1,892$1.80$5,782$4.28$7,674$6.08397Page 621 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHBUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULECONSOLIDATED NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEESFY 24-25BASEADD'LBASEADD'LBASEADD'LUBCPLAN CHKCOST PERINSPECT.COST PERPC/INSPCOST PERGROUPDESCRIPTIONSQ FTCOST100 SQ FTCOST100 SQ FTCOST100 SQ FTPLAN CHECKINSPECTIONPLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONR-2MULTI-FAMILY1,000$1,268$13.80$1,818$38.98$3,087$52.78 RESIDENTIAL, NEW5,000$1,820$1.09$3,378$51.95$5,198$53.0424b10,000$1,875$3.31$5,975$12.99$7,850$16.3020,000$2,206$1.65$7,274$5.20$9,479$6.8550,000$2,702$1.99$8,832$4.68$11,534$6.66100,000$3,694$1.99$11,170$4.68$14,865$6.66R-2MULTI-FAMILY1,000$522$5.68$807$17.30$1,329$22.97 RESIDENTIAL5,000$749$0.45$1,499$23.06$2,248$23.50 EXTERIOR10,000$771$1.36$2,652$5.76$3,423$7.1324c20,000$907$0.68$3,228$2.31$4,135$2.9950,000$1,111$0.82$3,920$2.08$5,031$2.89100,000$1,520$0.82$4,958$2.08$6,477$2.89MIXED USE1,000$914$12.91$1,879$41.08$2,793$53.99NEW5,000$1,430$0.79$3,522$46.98$4,952$47.7824g10,000$1,470$2.78$5,871$23.48$7,341$26.2720,000$1,748$1.46$8,220$5.48$9,968$6.9450,000$2,185$1.83$9,864$5.64$12,049$7.46100,000$3,099$1.83$12,682$5.64$15,781$7.46MIXED USE1,000$478$6.76$723$15.80$1,201$22.56EXTERIOR5,000$749$0.42$1,355$18.07$2,103$18.4924f10,000$769$1.46$2,258$9.03$3,027$10.4920,000$915$0.76$3,161$2.11$4,076$2.8750,000$1,144$0.96$3,793$2.17$4,937$3.12100,000$1,622$0.96$4,877$2.17$6,499$3.12398Page 622 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHBUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULECONSOLIDATED NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEESFY 24-25BASEADD'LBASEADD'LBASEADD'LUBCPLAN CHKCOST PERINSPECT.COST PERPC/INSPCOST PERGROUPDESCRIPTIONSQ FTCOST100 SQ FTCOST100 SQ FTCOST100 SQ FTPLAN CHECKINSPECTIONPLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONMIXED USE500$662$44.10$805$96.55$1,466$140.65RENOVATION1,000$882$18.38$1,287$50.06$2,169$68.44STRUCTURAL2,000$1,066$1.22$1,788$46.83$2,854$48.0624e5,000$1,103$4.41$3,193$25.54$4,295$29.9510,000$1,323$3.31$4,470$8.94$5,793$12.2520,000$1,654$2.21$5,364$5.11$7,018$7.3150,000$2,315$2.21$6,897$5.11$9,212$7.31MIXED USE500$540$36.03$740$88.75$1,280$124.78RENOVATION1,000$721$15.01$1,183$46.02$1,904$61.03NON-STRUCTURAL2,000$871$1.00$1,644$43.05$2,514$44.0524d5,000$901$3.60$2,935$23.48$3,836$27.0810,000$1,081$2.70$4,109$8.22$5,190$10.9220,000$1,351$1.80$4,931$4.70$6,282$6.5050,000$1,892$1.80$6,339$4.70$8,231$6.50R-3SINGLE FAMILY2,000$1,819$47.87$3,122$34.69$4,941$82.57RESIDENTIAL3,000$2,298$52.59$3,469$86.60$5,767$139.19NEW5,000$3,350$7.69$5,201$34.74$8,551$42.433410,000$3,734$7.69$6,938$34.74$10,672$42.43R-3SINGLE FAMILY1,000$828$27.59$1,609$96.53$2,437$124.13RESIDENTIAL2,000$1,104$23.00$2,574$100.11$3,678$123.11REMODEL3,000$1,334$2.30$3,575$140.47$4,909$142.77STRUCTURAL5,000$1,380$5.52$6,385$51.08$7,764$56.603610,000$1,656$5.52$8,939$51.08$10,594$56.60R-3SINGLE FAMILY1,000$586$19.52$1,417$85.02$2,003$104.55RESIDENTIAL2,000$781$16.27$2,267$88.17$3,048$104.44REMODEL3,000$944$1.63$3,149$123.72$4,093$125.35NON-STRUCTURAL5,000$976$3.90$5,623$44.99$6,600$48.893510,000$1,171$3.90$7,873$44.99$9,044$48.89399Page 623 of 1002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHBUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULECONSOLIDATED NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEESFY 24-25BASEADD'LBASEADD'LBASEADD'LUBCPLAN CHKCOST PERINSPECT.COST PERPC/INSPCOST PERGROUPDESCRIPTIONSQ FTCOST100 SQ FTCOST100 SQ FTCOST100 SQ FTPLAN CHECKINSPECTIONPLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONTRADES REVIEW ADD-ONS TO ABOVE FEES:MECHANICAL - 5%ELECTRICAL - 5%PLUMBING - 5%400Page 624 of 1002 Misc and MEP FeesTOTAL COST PER PERMITPROPOSED FEEBUILDINGAbatement Permit - Removal of Hazourdous Materials (LEAD, ASBESTOS)$458.25 $458.00PER PERMITAccessory Dwelling Unit or JADU (Existing)$2,187.05 $2,187.00PER PERMIT (1)Accessory Dwelling Unit or JADU (New)$3,054.05 $3,054.00PER PERMIT (1)Accessory Structures - Minor - Trellis, Patio Cover, Deck, Cabana, etc.$1,835.12 $1,835.00PER PERMITAccessory Structures - Major - Pool House, Habitable Access Struct, Pool/Spa, etc.$3,009.27 $3,009.00PER PERMIT (1)Fences/Block Walls (Standard Plans)$999.36 $999.00PER PERMITBlock Walls (Engineered)$1,784.46 $1,784.00PER PERMITAdditional Plan Review$663.76 FULLY ALLOCATED HOURLY RATEPER HOURAddress Assignment$328.13 $328.00PER ADDRESSAfter Hours Inspection (Minimum 4 Hours)$720.41 $720.00BASE + HOURLY RATE OVER 4 HOURSAssembly Space - Renovation - Non Structural$1,921.92 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESAssembly Space - Renovation - Structural$2,353.78 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESAssembly Space - New$4,244.05 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESAppeal to Board of Appeals$4,652.71 $4,653.00PER APPEALAt Risk Form Application$310.83 $311.00PER APPLICATIONBathroom Remodel$859.99 $860.00PER PERMITBuilding & Safety Pre-Inspection (CE/Damaged)$549.31 $549.00PER INSPECTIONBuilding Permit Issuance$0.00 INCLUDED IN OTHER PERMIT FEESSupplemental Building Permit Issuance$0.00 INCLUDED IN OTHER PERMIT FEESCode Enforcement Re-Inspection$375.88 $376.00PER INSPECTIONCommercial - Non TI, Core and Shell$2,168.44 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESCommercial - New$4,278.94 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESChange of Use/Conversion$3,166.44 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESDemolition Permit$1,309.52 $1,310.00PER PERMITDuplicate Certificate of Occupancy$57.87 $58.00PER CERTIFICATEDuplicate Inspection Card$159.06 $159.00PER CARDDuplicate Construction Rules Sign$57.87 $58.00PER SIGNExpedited Plan Review in addition to regular Plan Review FeeADDITIONAL 50% OF THE PLAN CHECK FEE IN ADDTION TO THE STANDARD PLAN CHECK FEEExtended Construction Hours Review$313.75 $314.00PER REVIEWExtra Plan Review (exceeding 3 reviews)$569.97 FULLY ALLOCATED HOURLY RATEPER HOURFire Flow FeesSEE IMPACT FEE SCHEDULEGeneral Plan Maintenance10% OF ALL BUILDING/MEP PERMIT AND PLAN CHECK FEESHotel/Lodging Renovation Non Structural$2,369.80 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESHotel/Lodging Renovation Structural$2,926.68 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESHotel/Lodging - Exterior$2,103.18 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESHotel/Lodging - New$5,053.20 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESKitchen Remodel (Combination)$1,183.01 $1,183.00 PER PERMITMulti Family Residential Renovation Non Structural Single Unit$1,954.37 $1,954.00PER UNIT401Page 625 of 1002 Misc and MEP FeesTOTAL COST PER PERMITPROPOSED FEEMulti Family Residential Renovation Structural Single Unit$2,499.74 $2,500.00PER UNITMulti Family Residential New$5,197.70 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESMulti Family Residential Exterior$2,247.68 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESMixed Use Renovation - Non Structural$2,514.30 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESMixed Use Renovation - Structural$2,853.80 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESMixed Use Exterior$2,103.18 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESMixed Use New$4,952.20 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESOccupant Load Review$1,290.22 $1,290.00PER REVIEWOther Inspections not specified$402.65 $403.00PER INSPECTIONPlan Revision$296.34 $296.00PER REVIEW PLUS HOURLY RATE FOR PLANNER AND BUILDING PLAN CHECKERRecords Technology System7% OF ALL BUILDING/MEP PERMIT, PLAN CHECK, PLANNING, AND ENGINEERING FEESRe-Inspection$429.31 $429.00PER INSPECTIONRe-Roof$607.29 $607.00PER PERMITResidential Building Report$674.89 $675.00PER REPORTRetaining Wall$1,013.51 $1,014.00PER PERMITSewer Cap Permit$289.18 $289.00PER PERMITSFR New Construction$8,550.85 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESSFR Remodel Non Structural$4,092.70 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESSFR Remodel Structural$4,909.01 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESShoring Permit$2,877.64 $2,878.00PER PERMITGrading - Excavation$1,652.14 $1,652.00PER PERMITSign Permit - Including Structural$925.01 $925.00PER PERMITSolar Plan Check/Inspection$0.00 STATE FEESState Building Standards Administration$0.00 STATE FEESState Building Standards - Strong Motion$0.00 STATE FEESTemporary Certificate of Occupancy$2,119.38 $2,119.00PER APPLICATIONTemporary Certificate of Occupancy - Renewal$1,510.74 $1,511.00PER APPLICATIONTenant Improvement NON STRUCTURAL$3,263.91 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS HEARING$1,850.81 $1,851.00PER HEARINGTenant Improvement - Structural$4,159.66 SEE NEW CONSTRUCT SQ FT FEESUse of Alternate Materials/Methods Review$1,765.49 $1,765.00PER REVIEWPreliminary Building Plan Review$475.27 $475.00PER REVIEWPedestrian Protection Plan Review$581.00 $581.00PER REVIEWCredit Card Processing Fee - ACA - PayPal3.49% of transaction and $0.45 for each transactionSeismic Retrofit (standard)$462.61 $463.00PER PERMITSesimic Retrofit (engineered)$1,262.27 $1,262.00PER PERMITWindow Change-Outs$253.05 $253.00PER PERMIT402Page 626 of 1002 Misc and MEP FeesTOTAL COST PER PERMITPROPOSED FEEsandblast/stucco repair$347.05 $347.00PER PERMITpermit extension/renewal$811.88 $812.00PER PERMITspecial event building plan review/inspections$0.00 $0.00PER PERMITwireless - new site$2,035.14 $2,035.00PER PERMITwireless - replacement/upgrade$1,398.22 $1,398.00PER PERMITNew Pool - Including Building and subtrades$1,999.01 $1,999.00PER PERMITNew Spa (Factory Built) - Including Building and subtrades$929.10 $929.00PER PERMITNew Spa (Site Built) - Including Building and subtrades$1,673.89 $1,674.00PER PERMITPool/Spa Renovation - Including Building and subtrades$985.56 $986.00PER PERMITELECTRICALElectrical Permit Issuance$153.93 $154.00PER PERMITSupplemental Electrical Permit Issuance$108.80 $109.00PER PERMITElectrical supplying a Sign$564.85 $565.00PER PERMITInspections not specified$255.70 $256.00PER INSPECTIONMeter Reset$400.20 $400.00PER PERMITMiscellaneous Conduits and Conductors (per 100 linear feet)$492.60 $493.00PER 100 LINEAR FEETNon-Residential Appliances, up to 1 hp$637.10 $637.00PER PERMITPlan Review - Electrical$698.47 $698.00PER PLANPlan Revision$296.34 $296.00PER REVIEW PLUS HOURLY RATE FOR PLANNER AND BUILDING PLAN CHECKERPole or Platform Mounted Fixtures, per fixture$157.13 $157.00PER FIXTUREPower Apparatus (Ratings in HP, KW, KVA, or KVAR) up to 50$817.73 $818.00PER PERMIT 51 and above$962.23 $962.00PER PERMITReceptacle, Switch, and Lighting Outlet, per fixture$72.25 $72.00PER PERMIT Each Additional Fixture$72.25 $72.00PER FIXTUREReinspections$200.10 $200.00PER INSPECTIONResidential Appliances, up to 1 hp$395.10 $395.00PER PERMITServices, Switchboards, Control Centers, & Panels up to 600 AMPS$492.60 $493.00PER PERMIT Non-SFR$637.10 $637.00PER PERMIT 401 AMPS and Above or 600 Volts$1,057.45 $1,057.00PER PERMITSwimming Pool ELECTRICAL$1,339.45 $1,339.00PER PERMITSwitchboards, First Section Standing Panel$395.10 $395.00PER PERMIT Additional Sections or over 600 Volts$133.63 $134.00PER ADD'L SECTIONTemporary Power Pole$303.67 $304.00PER PERMITMiscellaneous$364.08 $364.00PER PERMITElectrical Vehicle Charger $763.51 $764.00PER PERMIT403Page 627 of 1002 Misc and MEP FeesTOTAL COST PER PERMITPROPOSED FEEMECHANICALMechanical Permit Issuance$231.48 $231.00PER PERMITSupplemental Mechanical Permit Issuance$108.80 $109.00PER PERMITAir Handling Units (not including duct work) SFR$490.38 $490.00PER PERMIT Non-SFR$813.23 $813.00PER PERMITAlteration to Duct Work not otherwise noted$673.23 $673.00PER PERMITAppliance Vents per each fixture$108.38 $108.00PER FIXTUREBoilers, Compressors, and Absorption Systems 0-3 HP or 0-100,000 Btu/h$673.23 $673.00PER PERMIT 3-30 HP or 100,001-1,000,000 Btu/h$898.58 $899.00PER PERMIT 30-50 HP or 1,000,001-1,750,000 Btu/h +$1,093.58 $1,094.00PER PERMITDuct Work installation (per 100 linear feet)$397.38 $397.00PER 100 LINEAR FEETFireplace$1,306.46 $1,306.00PER PERMITFloor Furnace - Installation or Relocation$801.08 $801.00PER PERMITForced-Air or Gravity-Type Furnace or Burner SFR$801.08 $801.00PER PERMIT Non-SFR$1,043.08 $1,043.00PER PERMITHood served by Mechanical Exhaust COMM. KITCHEN HOOD$1,707.70 $1,708.00PER PERMITIncinerator/Kiln$1,093.58 $1,094.00PER PERMITIndependent Venting System$528.73 $529.00PER PERMITInspections not specified$255.70 $256.00PER INSPECTIONMiscellaneous$364.08 $364.00PER PERMITPlan Revision$296.34 $296.00PER REVIEW PLUS HOURLY RATE FOR PLANNER AND BUILDING PLAN CHECKERReinspections$200.10 $200.00PER INSPECTIONSingle Register Ventilation Fan$88.15 $88.00PER PERMITSplit System p/ Unit$592.38 $592.00PER UNITSuspended/Recessed Wall/Floor Mounted Heater$1,037.98 $1,038.00PER PERMITPLUMBINGPlumbing Permit Issuance$231.48 $231.00PER PERMITSupplemental Plumbing Permit Issuance$108.80 $109.00PER PERMITFire Sprinkler Piping System$108.80 $109.00PER PERMITGas System NEW For Each System, less than 2"$289.00 $289.00PER PERMIT 2" or more$458.75 $459.00PER PERMIT For Each Outlet, 1st Outlet$63.58 $64.00PER PERMIT For Each Outlet, Each Additional Outlet$63.58 $64.00PER OUTLETGrease Interceptor$242.00 $242.00PER PERMITGrease Trap$386.50 $387.00PER PERMITSPA PLUMBING$386.50 $387.00PER PERMIT404Page 628 of 1002 Misc and MEP FeesTOTAL COST PER PERMITPROPOSED FEEInspections not specified$255.70 $256.00PER INSPECTIONLawn Sprinklers, Vacuum Breakers, and Backflow Protection Dev. PER SYSTEM$437.00 $437.00PER SYSTEM Each Lawn Sprinkler System per Valve$72.25 $72.00PER VALVE Each Vacuum Breaker or Backflow Protection Device$72.25 $72.00PER DEVICE Backflow Protection Device greater than 6"$378.45 $378.00PER DEVICEMiscellaneous$252.88 $253.00PER PERMITPiping WATER NEW Single Family Residential (per dwelling unit)$1,218.60 $1,219.00PER UNIT Multi Family Residential (per non-res unit)$1,532.85 $1,533.00PER UNITPlan Revision$296.34 $296.00PER REVIEW PLUS HOURLY RATE FOR PLANNER AND BUILDING PLAN CHECKERPlumbing Fixtures and Vents SFR, 1st Fixture$289.00 $289.00PER PERMIT SFR, Each Additional Fixture$63.58 $64.00PER FIXTURE Non-SFR, 1st Fixture$870.50 $871.00PER PERMIT Non-SFR, Each Additional Fixture$63.58 $64.00PER FIXTUREPool/Spa Heater$705.49 $705.00PER UNITRainwater System (Inside Building$985.20 $985.00PER PERMITReinspections$255.70 $256.00PER INSPECTIONRepair or Alteration of Drainage or Vent Piping$581.50 $582.00PER PERMITRepair or Alteration of Piping$581.50 $582.00PER PERMITRepipe Single Family Residential (per dwelling unit)$773.00 $773.00PER DWELLING UNIT Multi Family Residential (per dwelling unit)$1,312.60 $1,313.00PER DWELLING UNITSewer 0-25 linear feet$144.50 $145.00PER PERMIT each additional 100 linear feet$57.80 $58.00PER 100 LINEAR FEETSolar Water Heating system$1,067.37 $1,067.00PER PERMITSwimming Pool$1,921.85 $1,922.00PER PERMITVacuum Breakers, and Backflow Protection Dev.$144.50 $145.00PER DEVICEWater Heater$160.53 $161.00PER DEVICENOTE: (1) Charge Trade Review Add-On Fees where appropriate405Page 629 of 1002 APPENDIX D DETAIL OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES 406Page 630 of 1002 DIRECT/ APPROVED SUGGESTEDDIRECT FACIL/FIELD TOTAL DIRECT DIRECTPROGRAM FULL TIME FACILITY/ INDIRECT TOTAL COST COST COST COST COSTREF # SERVICE COST COST TOTAL FIELD COST COSTS COSTS REVENUES RECOVERY RECOVERY RECOVERY RECOVERY RECOVERYS-126 Afterschool Program $77,557 $42,291 $119,848 $0 $184,333 $304,181 $114,000 95.1% 95.1% 37.5% 150.0% 100.0%S-126A Summer Camp Program $104,057 $36,061 $140,118 $0 $175,822 $315,940 $91,200 65.1% 65.1% 28.9% 150.0% 65.0%S-127 Recreation Classes $601,102 $48,543 $649,645 $111,250 $85,351 $846,246 $700,000 107.8% 92.0% 82.7% 145.0% 100.0%S-128 Private Special Events $11,102 $158,651 $169,753 $0 $236,143 $405,896 $60,000 35.3% 35.3% 14.8% 100% of Total 35.0%S-128A Long-Term Special Event Agreement $0 $3,715 $3,715 $0 $5,069 $8,784 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100% of Total 35.0%S-128B Special Event Reserved Parking Staging $77 $150 $227 $0 $315 $542 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100% of Total 35.0%S-128C Special Event Public Hearing $0 $74 $74 $0 $102 $176 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100% of Total 35.0%S-128D Special Event Modification $0 $223 $223 $0 $304 $527 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100% of Total 35.0%S-129 Excursions $58,102 $326 $58,428 $0 $19,818 $78,246 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%S-130 Theater Services $71,128 $33,096 $104,224 $319,151 $163,367 $586,742 $90,000 86.4% 21.3% 15.3% 100.0% 100.0%S-131 Recreation Facility Rentals $11,102 $37,109 $48,211 $91,686 $67,932 $207,829 $265,000 549.7% 189.4% 127.5% N/A N/AS-132 Ballfield Rentals $11,102 $28,632 $39,734 $13,148 $57,893 $110,775 $13,000 32.7% 24.6% 11.7% N/A N/AS-133 Film Permit$0 $12,801 $12,801 $0 $15,834 $28,635 $35,000 273.4% 273.4% 122.2% N/A N/ASUBTOTAL $945,329$401,672$1,347,001$535,235$1,012,283$2,894,519$1,368,200101.6%72.7%47.3%TAX-24 Recreation Facility Staffing $11,102 $325 $11,427 $0 $20,019 $31,446 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%TAX-25 Senior Center $14,652 $24,881 $39,533 $25,238 $53,867 $118,638 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%TAX-26 Skate Park $11,102 $325 $11,427 $0 $20,019 $31,446 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%TAX-27 City Special Events $187,158 $39,199 $226,357 $0 $69,217 $295,574 $0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%SUBTOTAL $224,014$64,730$288,744$25,238$163,122$477,104$00.0%0.0%0.0%TOTAL $1,169,343$466,402$1,635,745$560,473$1,175,405$3,371,623$1,368,20083.6%62.3%40.6%PROGRAM COSTS ARE PART TIME COSTS (INCLUDING BENEFITS) AND DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSESFULL TIME COSTS ARE SALARIES, BENEFITS, AND OTHER OPERATING EXPENSESINDIRECT COSTS INCLUDES CITY AND DEPT O/H, AND OTHER DEPARTMENTSDIRECT COSTSCITY OF HERMOSA BEACHDETAIL OF RECREATION SERVICESFISCAL YEAR 2024-2025407Page 631 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 S-001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - COMM/OTHER**Res 84-4735 001-3812 $6,065 per application $6,277 per application S-002 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - FENCE/WALL**HBMC 17.46 001-3864 $2,624 per application $2,716 per application S-003 CONDO - CUP/PDP**84-4735 001-3899 $6,299 per application plus $233 per unit over 2 units $6,519 per application plus $241 per unit over 2 units MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT** Res 20-7256 001-6886 $2,641 per application $2,733 per application S-004 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN**Res 90-5351 001-3867 Commercial/Mixed Use- $6,624 per application Residential- $6,299per application Commercial/Mixed Use- $6,856 per application Residential- $6,447 per application S-004A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN- COASTAL ZONE PERMIT **Res 16-7045 001-3867 Administrative Permit alone- $640 per application Administrative Permit with another application- $321 Plus $4,776 if hearing is required. Administrative Permit alone- $662 per application Administrative Permit with another application- $332 Plus $4,943 if hearing is required. S-005 TEXT AMENDMENT**Res 16-7045 001-3886 $7,078 per application $7,326 per application S-006 ZONE CHANGE**84-4735 001-3811 $5,055 per application $5,232 per application S-007 VARIANCE**HBMC 17.46 001-3808 $4,674 per application $4,838 per application S-008 SIGN VARIANCE**HBMC 17.46 001-6802 $3,338 per application $3,455 per application S-009 PARKING PLAN**Res 85-4884 001-3857 $5,596 per application $5,792 per application S-010 AMENDMENT TO PLANNING ENTITLEMENT**Res 84-4735/ Res 93-5634 001-3805 $5,343 per application $5,530 per application S-011 TIME EXTENSION **Res 16-7045 001-3883 $1,229 per application $1,272 per application S-012 TENTATIVE MAP**HBMC 17.46 001-3809 $5,836 per map $6,040 per map S-013 FINAL MAP**Res 84-4735 001-3810 $875 per map $906 per map S-014 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT**Res 88-5144 001-3884 Applicant Requested - $3,652 per application Condition of Approval or Combining Lots - $507 per application Applicant Requested - $3,780 per application Condition of Approval or Combining Lots - $525 per application DEVELOPMENT SERVICES USER FEES Page 632 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 S-015 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - TEXT**Res 84-4735 001-6803 $6,466 per application or deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. $6,692 per application or deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-016 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - MAP**Res 84-4735 001-6803 $4,804per application $4,972 per application S-017 MURAL REVIEW**Res 16-7045/ 20- 7256 001-6801 $578 per application. $598 per application. S-018 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT**Res 16-7045 001-6804 $589 per application $610 per application S-019 SLOPE/GRADE HEIGHT DETERMINATION**Res 16-7045 001-3888 $3,527 per application $3,650 per application S-020 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION**Res 92-5577 001-3898 $4,910 per application $5,082 per application S-021 LEGAL DETERMINATION**Res 16-7045 001-3870 $5,024 per application $5,200 per application S-022 UNUSUAL ARCHITECTURAL/BUILDING REVIEW**Res 16-7045 001-6805 $3,039 per application $3,145 per application S-023 DETERMINATION OF SIMILAR USE**Res 16-7045 001-6806 $2,457 per application 50% of this fee would be credited towards future code text amendment fees related to the same project. $2,543 per application 50% of this fee would be credited towards future code text amendment fees related to the same project. S-024 PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION**Res 16-7045 001-6807 $1,857 per application $1,922 per application S-025 REQUEST FOR REASONABLE ACCOMODATION**Res 16-7045 001-6808 $1,116 per application $1,155 per application S-026 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION**Res 16-7045 001-6809 $233 per application $241 per application S-027 INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION**84-4735 001-3803 $4,240 per application $4,388 per application S-028 RECIRCULATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION**Res 16-7045 001-3803 $2,630 per application $2,722 per application S-029 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REVIEW Res 16-7045 001-2110 Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-030 PLANNING SIGN PERMIT**Ord 77-574 001-3802 $795 per application $823 per application S-030A PLANNING A-FRAME SIGN PERMIT**Res 16-7045 001-3239 New-$201 per application Annual Renewal- $121 per renewal New-$208 per application Annual Renewal- $125 per renewal S-031 MASTER SIGN PROGRAM**Ord 77-574 001-3802 $822 per application $851 per application S-032 TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT**Res 16-7045 001-3215 $106 per application $110 per application Page 633 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 MINOR PLANNING SIGN REVIEW**Res 20-7256 001-6887 $145 per application $150 per application S-033 ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT**Res 10-6718 001-3226 $621 per application Temp Minor Special Event (Expedited 3 Day Review)- 200% x fee. $643 per application Temp Minor Special Event (Expedited 3 Day Review)- 200% x fee. S-034 ADMIN PERMIT - ABANDON CUP**Res 10-6722 001-3859 $802 per application $830 per application S-035 DEED RESTRICTION/COVENANT REVIEW**Res 16-7045 001-6810 $855per application $885per application S-036 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Res 16-7045 001-2110 Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-037 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW**Res 16-7045 001-6811 $368 per application $381 per application S-038 PLANNING LANDSCAPE DOC PACKAGE REV**Res 16-7045 001-6812 $689 per application $713 per application S-039 APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION**Res 16-7045 001-6820 $3,180 per appeal $3,291 per appeal S-040 APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL**Res 16-7045/ Exec Order 001-3891 001-3890 001-3856 001-1121-4323 (advertising) 001-3825 (poster) $2,179 per appeal plus: Second Noticing: Residential: Second Notice 300' Radius $301 Legal Ad $201 Poster $226 Total: $728 Non-Residential: Second Notice 500' Radius $668 Legal Ad $201 Poster $226 Total: $1,095 $2,255 per appeal plus: Second Noticing: Residential: Second Notice 300' Radius $312 Legal Ad $208 Poster $234 Total: $754 Non-Residential: Second Notice 500' Radius $691 Legal Ad $208 Poster $234 Total: $1,133 S-041 PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW**Res 16-7045 001-6813 $161 per meeting This fee will credited against future fees for a consistent project. $167 per meeting This fee will credited against future fees for a consistent project. S-042 EXTRA MEETING**Res 16-7045 001-6814 $782 per meeting $809 per meeting S-043 SPECIAL MEETING**Res 16-7045 001-6815 $1,617 per meeting $1,674 per meeting S-044 TRAFFIC/SPECIAL STUDY REVIEW Res 16-7045 001-6816 Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Page 634 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 S-045 EXTRA PLAN REVIEW Res 16-7045 001-6817 Actual charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Actual charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-046 ZONING LETTER**Res 16-7045 001-3895 $240 per letter $248 per letter S-047 NEW/MODIFIED BUSINESS ZONING REVIEW**Res 16-7045 001-6818 $79 per business $82 per business 001-3868 001-3890 300 foot radius: First Notice - $1,007 Second Notice - $301 300 foot radius: First Notice - $1,042 Second Notice - $312 001-3824 001-3856 500 foot radius: First Notice - $1,676 Second Notice - $668 500 foot radius: First Notice - $1,735 Second Notice - $691 Res 78-4239 001-3825 Poster - $226 Enhanced Noticing/Outreach- Actual Cost Legal Ad (Easy Reader)- $192 Poster - $234 Enhanced Noticing/Outreach- Actual Cost Legal Ad (Easy Reader)- $199 S-049 GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE**Res 16-7045 001-3804 $3 per $1,000 building permit valuation This fee is applied to all residential and commercial construction with a valuation of $100,000 or more per site/project. $3 per $1,000 building permit valuation This fee is applied to all residential and commercial construction with a valuation of $100,000 or more per site/project. S-049A RECORDS TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM Res 16-7045 001-6866 7% of all Building Permit Plan Check fees, Planning fees, and Engineering Fees. 7% of all Building Permit Plan Check fees, Planning fees, and Engineering Fees. S-050 HISTORIC RESOURCE REVIEW**Res 16-7045 001-6819 Minor Certification - $1,016 Major Certification - $2,752 Nomination - $3,152 Removal - $5,244 Waiver of 90% of fees available (limited to 2 waivers per fiscal year) Minor Certification - $1,052 Major Certification - $2,848 Nomination - $3,262 Removal - $5,428 Waiver of 90% of fees available (limited to 2 waivers per fiscal year) Permit fees are calculated based on the construction valuation of the project as provided in Table 3-A (see Exhibit B, page 26) Plan Check fees are 80% of the Building Permit Fee. The valuation for new construction will be increased using the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index, applied to square footage table in permit software. which will bring the costs current. Expedited plan check fee is 150% of the standard plan check fee. Permit fees are calculated based on the construction valuation of the project as provided in Table 3-A (see Exhibit B, page 26) Plan Check fees are 80% of the Building Permit Fee. The valuation for new construction will be increased using the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index, applied to square footage table in permit software. which will bring the costs current. Expedited plan check fee is 150% of the standard plan check fee. See Exhibit C, for individual plumbing, mechanical, and electrical fees. These Fees are increased by the CPI Index starting 9/1/13 See Exhibit C, for individual plumbing, mechanical, and electrical fees. These Fees are increased by the CPI Index starting 9/1/13 001-3204 building permits. See Exhibit C for Plumbing/ Mechanical/ Electrical Permit accounts + plan check when required 001-3813 BUILDING PERMIT OR PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION S-048 PUBLIC NOTICING** Res 16-7045 S-051 HBMC 15.04/ HBMC 15.16/ HBMC 15.12/ HBMC 15.32 Page 635 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 S-052 SOLAR PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION Res 16-7045 001-6821 Residential Solar: 1-15kW: $450, with anything over 15kW is an additional $15 per additional 1kW Commercial Solar: 1-50kW: $721, with anything over 50kW is an additional $7 per additional 1kW Residential Solar: 1-15kW: $450, with anything over 15kW is an additional $15 per additional 1kW Residential Thermal System: 1-10KW: $450, with anytrhing over 10kW is an additional $15 per additional 1kW Commercial Solar: 1-50kW: $1,000, With anything over is an additional $7 per kilowatt between 51 kilowatts and 250 kilowatts, plus $5 per kilowatt for each kilowatt above 250 kilowatts. Commercial Thermal System: 1- 30kW: $1,000, With anything over 30kW is an additional $7 per kilowatt between 31 kilowatts and 260 kilowatts, plus $5 per kilowatt for each kilowatt above 260 kilowatts. S-053 TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY**Res 16-7045 001-6822 $79 per application $82 per application S-054 DAMAGED BUILDING INSPECTION**Res 16-7045 001-6823 $106 per inspection $110 per inspection S-055 EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION HOURS REVIEW**Res 16-7045 001-6824 $133 per application $138 per application S-056 OCCUPANT LOAD REVIEW**Res 16-7045 001-3204 $1,491 per application $1,543 per application S-057 BUILDING ADDRESS CHANGE**Res 16-7045 001-3817 $301 per address $312 per address S-058 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING REPORT/INSPECT**Res 84-4736 001-3801 $306 per building $317 per building S-059 APPEAL TO BOARD OF APPEALS**Ord N.S. 508 001-3806 $1,843 per appeal $1,908 per appeal S-059A USE OF ALTERNATE MAT'L/METHODS **Res 16-7045 001-6868 $226 per review $234 per review S-061 CLEAN BAY RESTAURANT-NPDES INSPECT**Res 16-7045 001-6825 $266 per annual inspection- Clean Bay Restaurant $42 per annual inspection- Grease Control Device $275 per annual inspection- Clean Bay Restaurant $43 per annual inspection- Grease Control Device S-062 LIGHT INDUSTRY-NPDES INSPECTION**Res 16-7045 001-6826 $266 per inspection (2 inspections in 5 years) $275 per inspection (2 inspections in 5 years) S-063 STORMWATER MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW**Res 16-7045 001-6827 $640 per application If contract services are used, charge the actual cost of the contract services. $662 per application If contract services are used, charge the actual cost of the contract services. S-064 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK**Res 16-7045 001-6828 Single Family Residence/Multi Family Residence/Commercial- $1,451 per plan plus $240 per each additional dwelling unit up to 4 units. Multi Family Residential over 4 dwelling units/Other- Deposit determined by staff (minimum of $2,500) with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Single Family Residence/Multi Family Residence/Commercial- $1,502 per plan plus $248 per each additional dwelling unit up to 4 units. Multi Family Residential over 4 dwelling units/Other- Deposit determined by staff (minimum of $2,500) with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Page 636 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 S-065 STREET/ROW VACATION REVIEW Res 16-7045 001-6829 Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-066 ENGINEERING STUDY REVIEW Res 16-7045 001-6830 Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Stop Sign or Traffic Review Resident Requests - No charge for the first review. For any review within two years of the last review charge full costs of the review. Fee Cushion Installation-No Charge Speed Cushion Removal- Actual Costs Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Stop Sign or Traffic Review Resident Requests - No charge for the first review. For any review within two years of the last review charge full costs of the review. Fee Cushion Installation-No Charge Speed Cushion Removal- Actual Costs S-067 ASSESSMENT DIST FORMATION RESEARCH Res 16-7045 001-6831 Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. S-068 BLUEPRINT/PLAN SHEET REPRODUCTION **Res 82-4500 001-3838 $45 per sheet for the first sheet plus $5 per each additional sheet or actual cost if using an outside copier. $47 per sheet for the first sheet plus $5 per each additional sheet or actual cost if using an outside copier. S-069 NON-UTIL STREET EXCAVATION PERMIT**Ord 84-762 001-3831 $807 per permit $835 per permit S-070 UTILITY TRENCH SERVICE CONNECT PERMIT**Ord 84-762/ Res 16-7045 001-3816 0-25 linear feet - $674 25-100 linear feet - $1,182 100+ linear feet - $240 for each additional 150 linear feet Over 1,000 linear feet- Actual Costs Utility Infrastructure Work- Actual Costs 0-25 linear feet - $698 25-100 linear feet - $1,223 100+ linear feet - $248 for each additional 150 linear feet Over 1,000 linear feet- Actual Costs Utility Infrastructure Work- Actual Costs S-071 SEWER LATERAL INSTALLATION PERMIT**Dept Policy 160-3832 $717 per permit $742 per permit S-072 SEWER CAP**Dept Policy 160-3829 $161 per permit $167 per permit S-073 MATERIAL STORAGE DROP-OFF PERMIT**Res 79-4303 & 79-4304 001-3815 $266 per permit Permit is valid for one day $275 per permit Permit is valid for one day S-074 STAGING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT**Res 79-4303 & 79-4304 001-3815 $266 per permit plus $17 per meter per day Permit is valid for one day $275per permit plus $18 per meter per day Permit is valid for one day S-075 CRANE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT**Res 79-4303 & 79-4304 001-3815 $266 per permit Permit is valid for one day $275 per permit Permit is valid for one day S-076 SCAFFOLDING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT**Res 79-4303 & 79-4304 001-3815 $345 per permit, plus $26 per day after 14 days $357 per permit, plus $27 per day after 14 days S-077 TEMPORARY FENCE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT **Res 79-4303 & 79-4304 001-3815 $266 per permit, plus $17 per day after 14 days $275 per permit, plus $18 per day after 14 days S-078 VALET PARKING RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT**1771367 001-3815 New/Annual - $226 per permit plus $18 per meter per day New/Annual - $234 per permit plus $19 per meter per day S-079 ROLL-OFF BIN RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT**Res 79-4303 & 79-4304 001-3815 $187 per permit Permit is valid for 14 days $194 per permit Permit is valid for 14 days Page 637 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 S-080 PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT**Res 88-5202 001-3834 $1,536 per permit $1,590 per permit S-081 OUTDOOR DINING ENCROACHMENT PERMIT** Council Action May 1988 & Res 24-7416 001-3834 A-Frame- $339 Commercial Awning only- $339 Outdoor Dining Encroachment Standard Off-Street: $1,664 Simple Off-Street: $506 On-Street: $1,948 Annual Renewal: $409 Minor Alteration: $322 A-Frame- $351 Commercial Awning only- $351 Outdoor Dining Encroachment Standard Off-Street: $1,722 Simple Off-Street: $524 On-Street: $2,016 Annual Renewal: $423 Minor Alteration: $333 S-082 NEWSRACK PERMIT**Res 00-6096 001-3219 New - $421 per permit plus $54 per news rack Annual - $33 per news rack New - $436 per permit plus $56 per news rack Annual - $34 per news rack S-083 WIDE/LONG LOAD PERMIT Res 16-7045 001-3815 Single Trip - $20 Annual Permit - $114 Fees are set by the State Single Trip - $20 Annual Permit - $114 Fees are set by the State S-084 TRAFFIC PLAN REVIEW**Res 16-7045 001-6849 $513 per plan or actual costs as determined by City staff $531 per plan or actual costs as determined by City staff S-084A PUBLIC TREE REMOVAL PERMIT**Ord 19-1397 001-6881 $238 per tree $246 per tree S-084B PUBLIC TREE INSTALLATION REVIEW**Res 16-7045 001-6870 $240 per tree $248 per tree S-084C DISABLED PARK SPACE INSTALLION **Res 16-7045 001-6869 $2,938 per request, with a waiver for those with a household income under $75,000. $3,041 per request, with a waiver for those with a household income under $75,000. S-084D PUBLIC BENCH DEDICATION **Res 16-7045 001-3903 Bench- $1,555 plus the cost of the bench, materials ad plaque. Plaque Replacement- $561 plus the cost of the plaque and materials. Remains a Donation. Bench- $1,609 plus the cost of the bench, materials ad plaque. Plaque Replacement- $581 plus the cost of the plaque and materials. Remains a Donation. S-084E EXTRA PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION Res 16-7045 001-3813 Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. WIRELESS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION Res 20-7266 $2,500.00 per application in the form of a deposit to be drawn down for actual hours spent reviewing and processing application $2,500.00 per application in the form of a deposit to be drawn down for actual hours spent reviewing and processing application SIDEWALK VENDING PERMIT**Res 19-7170 001-6882 $406 Initial Permit $406 Annual Renewal $420 Initial Permit $420 Annual Renewal TOBACCO RETAILER LICENSE**Res 18-7156 001-3880 $503 Initial Application $428 Annual Renewal $521 Initial Application $443 Annual Renewal SHORT TERM VACATION RENTAL**Ord 19-1365 001-6883 $2,100 Initial Permit $1,816 Annual Renewal $2,173 Initial Permit $1,880 Annual Renewal Page 638 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 LIMITED LIVE ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT FEE Res 18-7151 001-6874 $297 permit fee $307 permit fee M-1 ZONE LIMITED EVENTS PERMIT Res 20-7259 001-6884 $520 application fee (Updated 5/1/2024 to reflect 20-7259. Fee has not been escalated.) $520 application fee COMBINATION FEES PRESENTED AT THE SAME TIME: HIGHEST FEE 100% OF THE FEE 2ND HIGHEST FEE 50% OF THE FEE ALL OTHER FEES 25% OF THE FEE CEQA AND PUBLIC NOTICING FEES ARE EXEMPTED FIRE FLOW FEE HBMC 15.20.140 180-3912 1. Residential = $.094 per square foot of net floor area. 2. Non-Residential $0.119 per square foot of net floor area. The calculation of floor area shall include the floor area of all structures including the main structure and any accessory structures, including, but not limited to garages, structural decks, balconies, and shall be measured from the outside of the walls or perimeter of said structures. For new projects, the net floor area shall be calculated as the total floor area of the new structure minus any floor area of any existing legally permitted structures demolished as part of the new project. For existing structures that add floor area, the fee shall be applied to the net increase in floor area. 1. Residential = $.094 per square foot of net floor area. 2. Non-Residential $0.119 per square foot of net floor area. The calculation of floor area shall include the floor area of all structures including the main structure and any accessory structures, including, but not limited to garages, structural decks, balconies, and shall be measured from the outside of the walls or perimeter of said structures. For new projects, the net floor area shall be calculated as the total floor area of the new structure minus any floor area of any existing legally permitted structures demolished as part of the new project. For existing structures that add floor area, the fee shall be applied to the net increase in floor area. PARKS/REC FACILITY TAX HBMC 3.20.050 125-3116 $9,441. Evaluate for Increase with User Fee Changes each year - Increase for cost of living change based on BLS - LA/Long Beach/ Anaheim CPI for June All Urban Consumers. Increase was 3.2 % for June 2024. $9,743. Evaluate for Increase with User Fee Changes each year - Increase for cost of living change based on BLS - LA/Long Beach/ Anaheim CPI for June All Urban Consumers. Increase was 3.2 % for June 2025. PARKS/REC IN LIEU FEE Res 86-849 125-3910 $14,096. Per condominium unit. Parks/Rec Facility Tax credit(s) are applied if a previous dwelling unit(s) existed, not to exceed the new dwelling unit(s) total. $14,096. Per condominium unit. Parks/Rec Facility Tax credit(s) are applied if a previous dwelling unit(s) existed, not to exceed the new dwelling unit(s) total. OTHER DEVELOPMENT FEES (INFORMATION ONLY) PARKS/REC FACILITY TAX (INFORMATION ONLY) Page 639 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 S-085 POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE**HBMC 8.24 001-3863 3 free responses in a calendar year Each subsequent response: Burglary Alarm - $118 Robbery Alarm - $333 3 free responses in a calendar year Each subsequent response: Burglary Alarm - $122 Robbery Alarm - $345 S-086 POLICE ALARM PERMIT**HBMC 8.24 001-3862 New/Annual - $24 per permit New/Annual - $25 per permit S-087 DUI COLLISION RESPONSE Res 16-7045 001-6832 Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all emergency personnel responding, not to exceed $12,000 per incident by State law. Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all emergency personnel responding, not to exceed $12,000 per incident by State law. S-087A LOUD PARTY RESPONSE Res 16-7045 001-3869 First Response in an evening- No Charge Each Subsequent Response- Actual Cost First Response in an evening- No Charge Each Subsequent Response- Actual Cost S-088 VEHICLE IMPOUND RELEASE**Council Action 8/85 001-3841 $274 per vehicle $284 per vehicle S-088A IMPOUND RELEASE OF BICYCLES, SCOOTERS, & OTHER WHEELED MOBILITY DEVICES **Res 18-7142 001-6873 $168 $174 S-089 VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION VERIFICATION Res 16-7045 001-6833 This service is no longer provided.This service is no longer provided. S-090 CITATION SIGN-OFF **Res 16-7045 001-6834 Resident - No Charge Non-Resident - $60 per citation Resident - No Charge Non-Resident - $62 per citation S-091 VEHICLE REPOSSESSION AB1972-Jan 94 001-3818 $15 per vehicle This fee is set by the State $15 per vehicle This fee is set by the State S-092 BOOKING PROCESSING**Res 16-7045 001-3301 $445 per booking $461 per booking S-093 TAXICAB INSPECTION**Res 16-7045 001-6835 First Inspection - No Charge (part of franchise fee) Subsequent Inspection - $69 One Day Taxicab Franchise Fee - $45 First Inspection - No Charge (part of franchise fee) Subsequent Inspection - $71 One Day Taxicab Franchise Fee - $47 S-094 POLICE BUSINESS BACKGROUND CHECK**Res 16-7045 001-6836 $339 per application plus any state fees $351 per application plus any state fees S-095 CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT Res 16-7045 001-3228 Fees are set by the State (Penal Code sec 12054): New Application - $100 ($20 collected upon application and the balance collected if the license is issued.) Renewal - $25 Amended - $10 Psychological testing costs are to be added to the above fees up to $150 State background check fees are to be added to the above fees Fees are set by the State (Penal Code sec 12054): New Application - $100 ($20 collected upon application and the balance collected if the license is issued.) Renewal - $25 Amended - $10 Psychological testing costs are to be added to the above fees up to $150 State background check fees are to be added to the above fees PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES USER FEES Effective 12/31/2017, fire inspection and permit services are performed by Los Angeles County Fire Department and fees are collected by the County per the Los Angeles County Fee Schedule. Page 640 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 S-096 VERIFICATION/CLEARANCE FORM/LETTER**CC Action 8/85 001-3818 $220 per letter $228 per letter S-097 AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT**HBMC 9.28.020 001-3214 $207 per permit $214 per permit S-098 BLOCK PARTY PERMIT**HBMC 9.28.020 001-3214 $246 per permit $255 per permit S-099 NON-RESIDENT BABY SEAT INSPECTION N/A N/A This service is no longer provided.This service is no longer provided. S-100 PRIVATE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT (In the Public right-of-way)**Res 16-7045 001-3229 Event in the Public Right-of-Way- $703 per application. Residential Private Event- $899 per application plus $500 deposit. Event in the Public Right-of-Way- $728 per application. Residential Private Event- $930 per application plus $500 deposit. S-101 POLICE REPORT REPRODUCTION Govt Code Section 6253 001-3818 $0.20 per copy $0.20 per copy S-102 POLICE AUDIO/VIDEO/DVD COPY **Res 16-7045 001-3818 $18 per disk/tape $19 per disk/tape S-103 POLICE PHOTO REPRODUCTION **Dept Policy 001-3818 $18 per photograph or disk/device $19 per photograph or disk/device S-103A FINGERPRINTING ON REQUEST **Res 16-7045 001-3818 $33 per Scan $34 per Scan HBMC 6.08.050 001-3202 Dog License: Spayed/Neutered - $27 Other - $112 Dog License: Spayed/Neutered - $28 Other - $116 HBMC 6.12.010 001-3202 Cat License: Spayed/Neutered - $14 Other - $36 Lost Tag - $6 Change Owner: Spayed Neutered - $14 Other - $36 Cat License: Spayed/Neutered - $14 Other - $37 Lost Tag - $6 Change Owner: Spayed Neutered - $14 Other - $37 HBMC 6.04.050- 060 001-3212 Animal/Fowl Permit - $111 Animal/Fowl Permit - $115 HBMC 6.04-070 001-3212 Animal/Fowl Appeal - $111 Animal/Fowl Appeal - $115 S-105 ANIMAL RELEASE REDEMPTION **HBMC 6.08.130 001-3213 First Offense - $63 Second Offense - $141 Third and Subsequent Response - $237 First Offense - $65 Second Offense - $146 Third and Subsequent Response - $245 S-106 DECEASED ANIMAL PICK-UP **Res 16-7045 001-6837 $74 per animal $77 per animal S-107 ANIMAL TRAP RENTAL Res 16-7045 001-6838 This service is no longer provided.This service is no longer provided. S-108 PET HOME QUARANTINE REVIEW **Res 16-7045 001-6839 $74 per animal $77 per animal S-108A NON-HOUSEHOLD PET ANIMAL PERMIT **Res 16-7045 001-3212 $138 per application $143 per application S-109 MULTIPLE DOG REVIEW **Res 16-7045 001-6840 $138 per application $143 per application S-109A JAIL SERVICES **Res 16-7045 001-3819 $331 per day $343 per day S-120 OPEN FIRE PERMIT **HBMC 15.20.010 001-3217 $28 per permit (Community Resources)$29 per permit (Community Resources) ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES **S-104 Page 641 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 S-122 AMBULANCE RESPONSE - Basic Life Support (BLS)Res 16-7045 001-3840 Maximum allowable county rates as calculated by the L.A. County Emergency Medical Services Agency, 7/1/24 to 6/30/25 rates: Transport - non emergency $2,121 - 911 emergency $2,276- Standby time for prescribed level of service and for each 30 minutes after the first 30 minutes $164 Per mile charge - $28 - Waiting time for each 30 minute after initial 30 minutes at request of person hiring ambulance $172 - Oxygen - $114 - Service between 7pm and 7am additional maximum charge $30 Neonatal - $288 - Ventilator $221 - Disposable supplies $33 Maximum allowable county rates as calculated by the L.A. County Emergency Medical Services Agency, 7/1/23 to 6/30/24 rates: Transport - non emergency $2,024 - 911 emergency $2,171- Standby time for prescribed level of service and for each 30 minutes after the first 30 minutes $172 Per mile charge - $30 - Waiting time for each 30 minute after initial 30 minutes at request of person hiring ambulance $180 - Oxygen - $120 - Service between 7pm and 7am additional maximum charge $32 Neonatal - $302 - Ventilator $234 - Disposable supplies $35 S-123 AMBULANCE RESPONSE - Advanced Life Support (ALS)Res 16-7045 001-3840 Maximum allowable county rates as calculated by the L.A. County Emergency Medical Services Agency, 7/1/24 to 6/30/25 rates: Transport - non emergency $3,038 911 emergency $3,252 - Standby time for prescribed level of service and for each 30 minutes after the first 30 minutes $164 Per mile charge - $28 - Waiting time for each 30 minute after initial 30 minutes at request of person hiring ambulance $172 - Oxygen - $114 - Service between 7pm and 7am additional maximum charge $30 Neonatal - $288 - Ventilator $221 - Disposable supplies $33 Maximum allowable county rates as calculated by the L.A. County Emergency Medical Services Agency, 7/1/25 to 6/30/26 rates: Transport - non emergency $3,184 911 emergency $3,408 - Standby time for prescribed level of service and for each 30 minutes after the first 30 minutes $172 Per mile charge - $30 - Waiting time for each 30 minute after initial 30 minutes at request of person hiring ambulance $180 - Oxygen - $120 - Service between 7pm and 7am additional maximum charge $32 Neonatal - $302 - Ventilator $234 - Disposable supplies $35 SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY **Dept. Policy 001-3823 $144.00/per hour per officer $149.00/per hour per officer WITNESS FEE Govt Code Section 68097.2 001-3818 $335.00 $335.00 S-126 AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM Res 16-7045 Res 15-6986 001-3894 Afterschool Program: $1900 annually for 5 day program $1200 annually for 3 day program Prices are market based and do not increase annually based on CPI. Fees are subject to increase. Afterschool Program: $1900 annually for 5 day program $1200 annually for 3 day program Prices are market based and do not increase annually based on CPI. Fees are subject to increase. S-126A SUMMER CAMP PROGRAM Res 16-7045 001-3893 Resident-$185 per week Non-Resident- $195 per week Prices are market based and do not increase annually based on CPI. Fees are subject to increase. Resident-$185 per week Non-Resident- $195 per week Prices are market based and do not increase annually based on CPI. Fees are subject to increase. RECREATION SERVICES USER FEES OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES FEES (INFORMATION ONLY) Page 642 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 Various fees set by the instructor offering the class: Various fees set by the instructor offering the class: Res 16-7045 001-3836 Refund Transaction - $16 Refund Transaction - $17 Res 16-7045 001-3833 Non-Resident Rate: $0-$99 class fee - $5 $100+ class fee - $10 Non-Resident Rate: $0-$99 class fee - $5 $100+ class fee - $10 S-127 RECREATION CLASSES Res 16-7045 001-3852 Administrative Fee - 10% of class fee Administrative Fee - 10% of class fee S-128 PRIVATE SPECIAL EVENTS ** (Coordinating privately-run special events that are provided in the public right-of-way) Res 16-7045 001-3418 Commercial Application Fee - $1,057 Commercial Category I - 70/30 revenue split with the City receiving 30% Commercial Category II - $3,362 Commercial Category III - $3,700 Commercial Category IV - $6,727 Non-Profit - $704 application fee plus $2 per participant Co-Sponsor - $356 per sponsor Set Up - $319 per day Tear Down - $319 per day Event Supervisor - $423 per day City Pass Thru - $353 application fee Commercial Application Fee - $1,094 Commercial Category I - 70/30 revenue split with the City receiving 30% Commercial Category II - $3,480 Commercial Category III - $3,830 Commercial Category IV - $6,962 Non-Profit - $729 application fee plus $2 per participant Co-Sponsor - $368 per sponsor Set Up - $330 per day Tear Down - $330 per day Event Supervisor - $438 per day City Pass Thru - $365 application fee S-129 EXCURSIONS Res 16-7045 001-4601-4201 The fee will vary depending on the excursion. Fees will include the excursion cost and the staff costs associated with each excursion. The fee will vary depending on the excursion. Fees will include the excursion cost and the staff costs associated with each excursion. S-130 THEATER SERVICES Res 16-7045 001-3406 Community Theater reservation fees and 2nd Story Theater reservation fees vary based on type of group, and staff and equipment use (see Exhibit E) Community Theater reservation fees and 2nd Story Theater reservation fees vary based on type of group, and staff and equipment use (see Exhibit E) S-131 RECREATION FACILITY RENTALS ** Res 16-7045 001-3405 Application Fee - $24 Recreation Facilities - Various fees depending on the room, type of group, and staff and equipment use (see Exhibit D) Pier Plaza: $423 per day staff fee plus $14,081 per day for Commercial Rentals Outdoor Fitness Permit- $130 per month with a $127 annual fee Application Fee - $25 Recreation Facilities - Various fees depending on the room, type of group, and staff and equipment use (see Exhibit D) Pier Plaza: $438 per day staff fee plus $14,574 per day for Commercial Rentals Outdoor Fitness Permit- $135 per month with a $131 annual fee RECREATION CLASSESS-127 Page 643 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 S-132 BALLFIELD RENTALS ** Res 16-7045 001-3405 Field use- $11 per hour Lighted Fields (7-10 pm)- $25 per hour Field Changeover Fee: To be determined by the Community Resources Department (must be paid by priority user groups, AYSO Region 18 and Hermosa Beach Little League, prior to start of season) Field use- $11 per hour Lighted Fields (7-10 pm)- $26 per hour Field Changeover Fee: To be determined by the Community Resources Department (must be paid by priority user groups, AYSO Region 18 and Hermosa Beach Little League, prior to start of season) S-132A NEW BEACH VOLLEYBALL COURT N/A N/A No fee recommended as of the 2015 User Fee Study. No fee recommended as of the 2015 User Fee Study. 001-3418 Filming: Application/Permit Fee - $672 Student Application Fee - $130 Location Fee - $1,569 -$3,520 per location per day Film Prep or Strike Fee - $140-$1,394 per location per day Still Photography: Application Fee - $281 Location Fee: First Location - $272 Each Additional Location - $140 Filming: Application/Permit Fee - $696 Student Application Fee - $135 Location Fee - $1,624 -$3,643 per location per day Film Prep or Strike Fee - $145-$1,443 per location per day Still Photography: Application Fee - $291 Location Fee: First Location - $282 Each Additional Location - $145 001-3842 Parking Meter - $27 Parking Meter - $28 IN-HOUSE ADULT SPORTS LEAGUES Dept. Policy 001-3894 Adult Softball League (11-Week Season) $520 Resident/$560 Non-resident Adult Basketball League (11-Week Season) $320 Resident/$360 Non-resident Prices are market-based and do not increase annually based on CPI. Fees are subject to increase HERMOSA SR CENTER DONATIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 001-3908 $10 $10 PRE-APPROVED PRIVATE INSTRUCTOR $30 (Program is being phased out and not open to new instructors.) $30 (Program is being phased out and not open to new instructors.) TENANT/USERS' LIABILITY INSURANCE PROGRAM (TULIP)Res 08-6598 001-3897 N/A N/A S-134 BANNER HANGING **Res 16-7045 001-3211 City Install- $762 per banner Outside Contractor- $69 per banner plus contractor costs City Install- $789 per banner Outside Contractor- $71 per banner plus contractor costs IN-LIEU FEE FOR STREET PAVEMENT Ord 09-1301 (Determined by City Engineer) 301-3913 Based on most recent unit prices for said work performed by competitive bidding for the City's annual street improvement program plus 30% for design, construction management, inspection & testing expenses. Costs to be updated annually. Based on most recent unit prices for said work performed by competitive bidding for the City's annual street improvement program plus 30% for design, construction management, inspection & testing expenses. Costs to be updated annually. Res 16-7045 OTHER MAINTENANCE SERVICES FEES (INFORMATION ONLY) MAINTENANCE SERVICES USER FEES S-133 OTHER RECREATION SERVICES FEES (INFORMATION ONLY) FILM PERMIT ** *The Recreation Services fees listed above are set by the market. Page 644 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 LIBRARY GENERAL MAINTENANCE Ord 84-762 001-3827 Contract with County Contract with County HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE Ord 84-762 001-3507 $1,892 - Maximum allowed by State contract.$1,892 - Maximum allowed by State contract. S-140 GARAGE SALE PERMIT ** Ord 82-682 001-3209 $8 per permit $8 per permit S-142 NSF CHECK PROCESSING ** Govt Code Section 6157 001-3837 $61 per NSF check $63 per NSF check S-143 DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION State Evidence Code Section 1560:1563 001-3839 $0.20 per copy FPPC-related copies - $0.10 per copy $0.20 per copy FPPC-related copies - $0.10 per copy S-143A ELECTRONIC FILE COPY ** Res 16-7045 $5 per device $5 per device S-144 DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION ** Res 16-7045 001-6847 $3 per document $3 per document S-145 APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DECISION (ENCROACHMENTS) ** HBMC 12.16.110 001-3814 $3,319 per appeal plus noticing costs and poster/advertising costs $3,435 per appeal plus noticing costs and poster/advertising costs S-147 INITIATIVE PROCESSING Res 16-7045 001-2110 $200 per initiative, refunded if within one year of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition. This is the maximum fee amount is set by State law (Elections Code Section 9202(b). $200 per initiative, refunded if within one year of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition. This is the maximum fee amount is set by State law (Elections Code Section 9202(b). S-102 AUDIO/VIDEO/DVD COPY Res 82-4215 001-3839 $16 per disk/tape $17 per disk/tape The City maintains a separate Business License Tax Schedule, which is adjusted annually on July 1 based on the April CPI. S-150 NEW BUSINESS REGISTRATION ** Res 16-7045 001-3877 $43 In-City, $26 Out-of-City $45 In-City, $27 Out-of-City S-151 BUSINESS REGISTRATION RENEWAL ** Res 16-7045 001-3879 $22 per Renewal $23 per Renewal S-152 DUPLICATE BUSINESS LICENSE ** Ord 82-682 001-3115 $9 per duplicate $9 per duplicate S-153 CREDIT CARD PROCESSING Res 16-7045 001-6867 2.75% of the amount charged 2.75% of the amount charged MAILING FEE Government Code Section 6253b - California Public Records Act 001-3896 $3.00 $3.00 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES USER FEES Page 645 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 PARKING METER RATES Ord 25-1490 001-3842 $2/hr from 10:00 am to 8:00 p.m and $2.50/h from 8:00 p.m to 2:00 am rate effective 6-22-2023. $3/hr from 10:00 am to 2:00 am rate effective 11-15-2025. PARKING LOT RATES Ord 25-1490 001-3845 $2/hr from 10:00 am to 8:00 p.m and $2.50/h from 8:00 p.m to 2:00 am rate effective 6-22-2023. $3.50/hr from 10:00 am 2:00 am rate effective 11-15-2025. PARKING STRUCTURE RATES Ord 25-1490 001-3846 $2/hr from 10:00 am to 8:00 p.m and $2.50/h from 8:00 p.m to 2:00 am rate effective 6-22-2023. $3.50/hr from 10:00 am 2:00 am rate effective 11-15-2025. $2.00/Sq.Ft. - Pier Plaza, closes encroachment before 11pm; off-Pier Plaza; on-street; sidewalk; retail, category created by City Council 7/11/2023 Rate increase 07/01/2025 - $2.50/Sq. Ft.3 $2.50/Sq.Ft. - Pier Plaza, closes encroachment before 11pm; off-Pier Plaza; on-street; sidewalk; retail, category created by City Council 7/11/2023 BINGO PERMITS HBMC 5.12 001-3210 $96.00 $99.00 OCCUPANCY PERMIT/COMMERCIAL INSPECTION Uniform Fire Code Sec 103.3 001-3207 $163- To be handled by Code Enforcement instead of Fire Inspector $169- To be handled by Code Enforcement instead of Fire Inspector $6.00/Sq. Ft. - Pier Plaza, closes after midnight, category created by City Council 7/11/2023 $4.00/Sq. Ft. - Pier Plaza, closes before midnight, category created by City Council 7/11/2023 $3.00/Sq. Ft. - Pier Plaza, closes before midnight, category created by City Council 7/11/2023 Rate increase 07/01/2025 - $4.00/Sq. Ft.2 $5.00/Sq. Ft. - Pier Plaza, closes after midnight, category created by City Council 7/11/2023 Rate increase 07/01/2025 - $6.00/Sq. Ft.1 001-6890COMM OUTDOOR DINING & RETAIL QUARTERLY FEE Res 23-7379 OTHER FEES (INFORMATION ONLY) Page 646 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 PARKING PERMIT, ANNUAL CC 1/23/2024 Minutes Action 001-3843 $50.00 - No future increases without Council Approval Residential Parking Permits are limited to three per year per residence, to vehicles registered to the residence $25.00- Half Year (50% of Full Year) $60.00 - No future increases without Council Approval Residential Parking Permits are limited to three per year per residence, to vehicles registered to the residence $30.00- Half Year (50% of Full Year) PARKING PERMIT, REPLACEMENT Res 82-4524 001-3843 $3.00 - No future increases without Council Approval $3.00 - No future increases without Council Approval PARKING PERMIT, EMPLOYEES (Revised 4-10-07)CC 2/28/23 Minutes Action 001-3843 $175.00 - No future increases without Council Approval $44.00/per quarter - No future increases without Council Approval PARKING PERMIT, EMPLOYEES LOT C Monthly CC 2/28/23 Minutes Action 001-6891 $75.00 - No future increases without Council Approval $75.00 - No future increases without Council Approval PARKING PERMIT, EMPLOYEES LOT C Daily CC 2/28/23 Minutes Action 001-6892 $38.00 - No future increases without Council Approval $38.00 - No future increases without Council Approval PARKING PERMIT, DAILY CC 1/23/2024 Minutes Action 001-3844 $6.00 - No future increases without Council Approval $12.00 - No future increases without Council Approval MONTHLY LOT PERMIT, 24 HR.CC 1/23/2024 Minutes Action 001-3858 $75.00 No future increases without Council Approval $250.00 No future increases without Council Approval MONTHLY LOT PERMIT, DAILY CC 1/23/2024 Minutes Action 001-3858 $38.00 No future increases without Council Approval $150.00 No future increases without Council Approval PARKING PERMIT, DRIVEWAY HBMC 10.32.080 001-3848 $170 - No future increases without Council Approval $170 - No future increases without Council Approval PARKING PERMIT, EVENT Res 85-4793 001-3849 $1.00 - No future increases without Council Approval $10.00 - No future increases without Council Approval PARKING PERMIT, CONTRACTOR CC 2/28/23 Minutes Action 001-3850 $42.00 - No future increases without Council Approval $42.00 - No future increases without Council Approval OVERSIZED VEHICLES Ordinance 001-6861 Annual Registration $54; max of 9 permits annually (no cost) Annual Registration $56; max of 9 permits annually (no cost) S-138 PARKING LOT MONTHLY PASS PROCESSING Res 16-7045 001-3858 Processing fee - $7 (in addition to parking rates). Not currently charged, under review Processing fee - $7 (in addition to parking rates). Not currently charged, under review S-139 DAILY PARKING LOT PROCESSING Res 16-7045 001-3844 Processing fee - $7 (in addition to parking rates). Not currently charged, under review Processing fee - $7 (in addition to parking rates). Not currently charged, under review REFUSE LIEN FEE Res 87-5024 001-3807 $14 $14 COMPOSTING WORM BIN PROCESSING Res 16-7045 117-3874 Compost Bin - $35 per bin W orm Bin - $70 per bin These fees charged at actual cost and are managed by the Environmental Programs Manager (no changes for 2024-25) Compost Bin - $35 per bin W orm Bin - $70 per bin These fees charged at actual cost and are managed by the Environmental Programs Manager (no changes for 2025-26) DRONE, UNMANNED AIRCRAFT PERMIT Res 16-1363 001-3236 Initial Permit $145 - Annual Renewal $75 - Adopted 6/15/16 Initial Permit $145 - Annual Renewal $75 - Adopted 6/15/16 IN-LIEU PARKING FEE 001-3847 $28,900/space $28,900/space CANNABIS DELIVERY PERMIT APPLICATION FEE Res 23-7389 001-3237 $702 per application $702 per application S-136 Page 647 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A REF #Service Title Legal Authority Account Number Fees Effective 12/1/24 Fees Effective 12/1/25 ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS Res 07-6526 001-3305 $100 first violation $200 second violation of the same provision of the code within one year $500 for each additional violation of the same provision of the code within one year $100 first violation $200 second violation of the same provision of the code within one year $500 for each additional violation of the same provision of the code within one year SOCIAL HOST ORDINANCE Res 16-7033 001-3305 1st. violation $2,500 - 2nd. Violation $5,000 - 3rd. Violation $10,000 Adopted 6/15/16 1st. violation $2,500 - 2nd. Violation $5,000 - 3rd. Violation $10,000 Adopted 6/15/16 VIOLATION OF THE CITY'S TREE ORDINANCE Res 19-7215 001-3305 $250 for a first violation, $500 for a second violation within one year of the first violation, and $1,000 for each additional violation within one year of the first violation. $250 for a first violation, $500 for a second violation within one year of the first violation, and $1,000 for each additional violation within one year of the first violation. SIDEWALK VENDING VIOLATIONS Res 19-7170 001-3305 Vending without a sidewalk vending permit- $250 for a first violation, $500 for a second violation within one year of the first violation, and $1,000 for each additional violation within one year of the first violation. Upon proof of a valid permit, the administrative fine assessed will be reduced to $100 for a first violation, $200 for a second violation within one year of the first violation, and $500 for each additional violation within one year of the first violation. Vending without a sidewalk vending permit- $250 for a first violation, $500 for a second violation within one year of the first violation, and $1,000 for each additional violation within one year of the first violation. Upon proof of a valid permit, the administrative fine assessed will be reduced to $100 for a first violation, $200 for a second violation within one year of the first violation, and $500 for each additional violation within one year of the first violation. VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 12.20.020 AND 12.28.010 OF TITLE 12 (STREETS, SIDEWALKS, AND PUBLIC PLACES) AND SECTION 6.08.020 OF TITLE 6 (ANIMALS), WHICH PERTAIN TO ANIMALS BEING MAINTAINED AND UNLEASHED IN AREAS WITHIN THE CITY. Res 21-7297 001-3305 $250 per violation $250 per violation 2 Bdr or less units: 1st violation $2,500 - 2nd. violation $5,000 - 3rd. violation $7,500 (in a 12 mos period) Adopted 10/22/19. 2 Bdr or less units: 1st violation $2,500 - 2nd. violation $5,000 - 3rd. violation $7,500 (in a 12 mos period) Adopted 10/22/19. 3 Bdr or more units: 1st Violation $5,000 - 2nd. Violation $10,000 - 3rd. Violation $15,000 (in a 12 mos period) Adopted 10/22/19. 3 Bdr or more units: 1st Violation $5,000 - 2nd. Violation $10,000 - 3rd. Violation $15,000 (in a 12 mos period) Adopted 10/22/19. FINE FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION UNDER HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 1.10.040 RELATED TO CANNABIS DELIVERY Res 23-7389 $20,000 per occurrence, the City Manager can approve a waiver for a first-time offense if a true and complete application for a lawful permit is made by the violating business operator. $20,000 per occurrence, the City Manager can approve a waiver for a first-time offense if a true and complete application for a lawful permit is made by the violating business operator. Rounding criteria (effective 9/1/97): If new fee increase is $.50 or less round down to nearest dollar; if new fee increase is $.51 or more, round up to the nearest dollar. Services set by the fee study are denoted by a reference number. Other fees not set by the fee study have no reference number but are included for ease of administration. ** Subject to annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustment. The September 2025 All Urban Consumers CPI Index is 3.5%. Only Fees greater than $15 dollars went up due to the rounding criteria. VIOLATION OF SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL ORDINANCE Ord 19-1395 001-3305 ADMINISTRATIVE FINES (INFORMATION ONLY) Page 648 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERMIT FEES (TABLE 3A) Effective 12-1-05 TOTAL VALUATION FEE $1 to $500 $35.84 $501 to $2,000 $35.84 for the first $500 plus $5.76 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000. $2,001 to $25,000 $122.24 for the first $2,000 plus $22.40 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000. $25,001 to $50,000 $637.44 for the first $25,000 plus $16.96 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000. $50,001 to $100,000 $1,061.44 for the first $50,000 plus $11.20 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000. $100,001 and up $1,621.44 for the first $100,000 plus $9.28 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof. • State Seismic Fee: 0.013% of project valuation, minimum $0.50 (residential) or 0.028% of project valuation, minimum $0.50 (commercial) • State Building Standards Administration Fee: $1 for every $25,000 project valuation • General Plan Maintenance Fee: $3 per $1,000 in valuation; applies to projects with valuation of $100,000 or more. • Plan Check fee is equal to 80% of the Building Permit fee. OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES: 1. Quadruple permit fee for illegal construction Four times permit fee (City Building Code 107.2) 2. Inspections outside of normal business hours $75 per hour (minimum charge - four hours) 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $75 per hour (minimum charge - four hours) 4. Additional plan review for revisions, additions, etc.$118 per hour (minimum charge - one hour) 5. Expedited plan review $112.5 per hour These fees are set by the Government Codes. There are no changes for FY 2025-26 Page 649 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE A - PLUMBING PERMIT FEES (001-3206)** Fees Effective Fees Effective Fee Service Name/Description 12/1/2024 12/1/2025 EACH PLUMBING FIXTURE, TRAP, OR SET OF FIXTURES ON $30.00 $31.00 ONE TRAP (INCLUDING WATER, DRAIN PIPING & BACKFLOW PROTECTION) EACH BUILDING SEWER OR TRAILER PARK SEWER $60.00 $62.00 RAINWATER SYSTEM PER DRAIN (INSIDE BUILDING)$30.00 $31.00 EACH WATER HEATER AND/OR VENT $30.00 $31.00 EACH PIPING SYSTEM OF 1 TO 5 OUTLETS $45.00 $47.00 EACH GAS OUTLET OVER 5 $8.00 $8.00 EACH INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRE-TREATMENT INTERCEPTOR INCLUDING TRAP & VENT (EXCEPTING KITCHEN-TYPE GREASE INTERCEPTORS FUNCTIONING AS FIXTURE TRAPS)$77.00 $80.00 UNDERSINK GREASE TRAP (FORMERLY GREASE TRAP PERMIT)$45.00 $47.00 EACH INSTALLATION, ALTERATION OR REPAIR OF WATER PIPING AND/OR WATER TREATING EQUIPMENT $13.00 $13.00 EACH REPAIR OR ALTERATION OF DRAINAGE OR VENT PIPING $13.00 $13.00 EACH LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM ON ANY ONE METER INCLUDING BACKFLOW PROTECTION DEVICES):$30.00 $31.00 ATMOSPHERIC-TYPE VACUUM BREAKERS (NOT INCLUDING ABOVE): 1 TO 5 $30.00 $31.00 OVER 5, EACH $8.00 $8.00 EACH BACKFLOW PROTECTIVE DEVICE (OTHER THAN ATMOSPHERIC- TYPE VACUUM BREAKERS): 2 INCHES AND SMALLER $30.00 $31.00 OVER 2 INCHES $30.00 $31.00 FIRE SPRINKLER PIPING SYSTEM:$30.00 $31.00 1 TO 10 HEADS $53.00 $55.00 11 TO 25 HEADS $87.00 $90.00 26 TO 50 HEADS $121.00 $125.00 51 TO 100 HEADS $186.00 $193.00 101 TO 200 HEADS $260.00 $269.00 201 TO 300 HEADS $331.00 $343.00 11/26/2025 Page 650 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE A - PLUMBING PERMIT FEES (001-3206)** FIRE SPRINKLER PIPING SYSTEM: 301 TO 500 HEADS $430.00 $445.00 501 TO 1000 HEADS $646.00 $669.00 1001 OR MORE HEADS $928.00 $960.00 MISCELLANEOUS (BUT NOT INCLUDED ABOVE $45.00 $47.00 FEE FOR ISSUING EACH PERMIT $85.00 $88.00 SUPPLEMENTAL ISSUANCE FEE $25.00 $26.00 ADDITIONAL PLAN CHECK Hourly Rates Hourly Rates ADDITIONAL INSPECTION Hourly Rates Hourly Rates OTHER INSPECTIONS NOT SPECIFIED Hourly Rates Hourly Rates 11/26/2025 Page 651 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE B - MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES (001-3227)** Fees Effective Fees Effective Fee Service Name/Description 12/1/2024 12/1/2025 HEATING, VENTILATIONS, AIR CONDITIONING OR REFRIGERATION FORCED-AIR OR GRAVITY-TYPE FURNACE (INCLUDING CUTS AND VENTS) UP TO 100,000 BTU $60.00 $62.00 OVER 100,000 BTU $60.00 $62.00 FLOOR FURNACE $77.00 $80.00 HEATER - SUSPENDED, RECESSED, WALL OR FLOOR MOUNTED $60.00 $62.00 GAS PIPING SYSTEM OF 1 TO 5 OUTLETS $45.00 $47.00 GAS PIPING SYSTEM OF 6 OR MORE OUTLETS, PER OUTLET $8.00 $8.00 APPLIANCE VENT - ONLY $45.00 $47.00 BOILER - UP TO 3 HP OR 100,000 BTU $60.00 $62.00 COMPRESSOR - 3 TO 15 HP OR 100,001 TO 500,000 BTU $60.00 $62.00 ABSORPTION - 15 TO 30 HP OR 500,001 TO 1,000,000 BTU $60.00 $62.00 SYSTEM - 30 TO 50 HP OR 1,000,000 TO 1,750,000 BTU $137.00 $142.00 OVER 50 HP OR OVER 1,750,000 BTU $137.00 $142.00 AIR HANDLING UNITS INCLUDING DUCTS - UNDER 10,000 C.F.M.$77.00 $80.00 OVER 10,000 C.F.M. $77.00 $80.00 EVAPORATIVE COOLER (NON-PORTABLE)$60.00 $62.00 VENT FAN / SINGLE DUCT $45.00 $47.00 MECHANICAL VENT $45.00 $47.00 MECHANICAL EXHAUST HOOD $45.00 $47.00 DOMESTIC-TYPE INCINERATOR $60.00 $62.00 COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL INCINERATOR $93.00 $96.00 REPAIR, ALTER, OR ADDITION TO EACH HEATING APPLIANCE, REFRIGERATION UNIT, COMFORT COOLING UNIT, OR SYSTEM (INCLUDING CONTROLS)$60.00 $62.00 ANY EQUIPMENT REGULATED (BUT NOT INCLUDED ABOVE)$157.00 $162.00 11/26/2025 Page 652 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE B - MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES (001-3227)** MISCELLANEOUS $45.00 $47.00 FEE FOR ISSUING EACH PERMIT $85.00 $88.00 SUPPLEMENTAL PERMIT $25.00 $26.00 ADDITIONAL PLAN CHECK Hourly Rates Hourly Rates ADDITIONAL INSPECTION Hourly Rates Hourly Rates OTHER INSPECTIONS NOT SPECIFIED Hourly Rates Hourly Rates 11/26/2025 Page 653 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE C - ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES (001-3205)** Fees Effective Fees Effective Fee Service Name/Description 12/1/2024 12/1/2025 NEW GENERAL USE BRANCH CIRCUITS RATING, TYPE OR USE OF BRANCH CIRCUITS 15 OR 20 AMP, 120V LIGHTING OR GENERAL USE RECEPTACLE, DWELLING APPLIANCES 15 TO 50 AMPS, NON-DWELLING MOTORS OR APPLIANCES SUPPLYING LOADS NOT EXCEEDING 3 HP OR KVA 1.1 TO 10 BRANCH CIRCUITS $60.00 $62.00 2.11 TO 40 BRANCH CIRCUITS $122.00 $126.00 3.41 OR MORE BRANCH CIRCUITS $180.00 $186.00 4.15 OR 20 AMP 208V TO 277V LIGHTING $30.00 $31.00 5.ALL OTHER LIGHTING BRANCH CIRCUIT 600V OR LESS $30.00 $31.00 FEES FOR ADDING OUTLETS (TO EXISTING BRANCH CIRCUITS) OR TEMPORARY LIGHTS & YARD LIGHTING NUMBER OF OUTLETS OR LAMPHOLDERS 1.1 TO 5 INCLUSIVE $30.00 $31.00 2.6 TO 10 INCLUSIVE $45.00 $47.00 3.FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 10 OUTLETS OR FRACTION THEREOF $28.00 $29.00 4.50 OR LESS LAMPHOLDERS, TOTAL FEE $93.00 $96.00 5.51 TO 100 LAMPHOLDERS, TOTAL FEE $137.00 $142.00 6.EACH 100 LAMPHOLERS OR FRACTION THEREOF OVER 100 $93.00 $96.00 FEES FOR MOTORS, TRANSFORMERS, HEATING APPLIANCES, AND MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT OR APPLIANCES H.P., K.W., OR K.V.A. RATING OF EQUIPMENT 1.OVER 3 AND NOT OVER 5 $93.00 $96.00 2.OVER 5 AND NOT OVER 20 $93.00 $96.00 3.OVER 20 AND NOT OVER 50 $93.00 $96.00 4.OVER 50 AND NOT OVER 100 $93.00 $96.00 5.OVER 100 $93.00 $96.00 Page 654 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE C - ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES (001-3205)** FEES FOR REQUIRED FIRE WARNING, COMMUNICATIONS AND EMERGENCY CONTROL SYSTEMS 1.UP TO 50 DEVICES $47.00 $49.00 2.51 TO 100 DEVICES $89.00 $92.00 3.101 TO 200 DEVICES $137.00 $142.00 4.201 TO 300 DEVICES $181.00 $187.00 5.300 TO 500 DEVICES $232.00 $240.00 6.OVER 500 DEVICES $272.00 $282.00 7.EACH CONTROL PANEL, STANDBY POWER PANEL, ANNUNCIATOR PANEL, OR SIMILAR MAIN PIECE OF CONTROL EQUIPMENT $47.00 $49.00 FEES FOR SERVICE AND SWITCHBOARD SECTIONS AMPACITY AND VOLTAGE RATINGS OF SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS, SERVICES SWITCHES OR CIRCUIT BREAKERS OR SWITCHBOARD SECTIONS 1.200 AMP OR LESS RATINGS - 600V OR LESS $77.00 $80.00 2.201 TO (AND INCLUDING) 600 AMP - 600V OR LESS $77.00 $80.00 3.OVER 600 AMP - 600V OR LESS $77.00 $80.00 4.OVER 600V RATINGS $77.00 $80.00 5.TEMPORARY POWER POLE $60.00 $62.00 MISCELLANEOUS (BUT NOT INCLUDED ABOVE)$45.00 $47.00 MISCELLANEOUS: FEE FOR ISSUING EACH PERMIT $85.00 $88.00 FEE FOR ISSUING EACH SUPPLEMENTAL PERMIT $25.00 $26.00 ADDITIONAL PLAN CHECK Hourly Rates Hourly Rates ADDITIONAL INSPECTION Hourly Rates Hourly Rates OTHER INSPECTIONS NOT SPECIFIED Hourly Rates Hourly Rates Rounding criteria (effective 9/1/97): If new fee increase is $.50 or less round down to nearest dollar; if new fee increase is $.51 or more, round up to the nearest dollar. ** September 2025 All Urban Consumers CPI Index is 3.5%. Only Fees greater than $15 dollars went up due to the rounding criteria. Page 655 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT D Community Center $29 application $34 per hour rental fee $29 per hour rental fee non-profit $75 refundable security deposit Gym $29 application fee $73 per hour rental fee $145 refundable security deposit $34 per hour non-profit rental fee Tennis Courts $9 per hour resident reservation $19 per hour instructor/Pro $11 all lighted hours (Resident) or $22 (Instructor) $19 annual membership fee Pickleball Courts $9 per hour resident reservation $19 annual membership fee Parks $29 application fee $29 fire permit fee $58 rental fee (4 hour block) $29 bouncer permit fee Rounding criteria (effective 9/1/97): If new fee increase is $.50 or less round down to nearest dollar; if new fee increase is $.51 or more, round up to the nearest dollar. ** September 2025 All Urban Consumers CPI Index is 3.5%. Only Fees greater than $15 went up due to the rounding criteria. RECREATION FACILITIES AND FEES** Page 656 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT E Non-Profit Rate Commercial Rate Performance Day (minimum of four hours required per day)$63 per hour $125 per hour Rehearsal Days (minimum of four hours required per day)$30 per hour $63 per hour Security Deposit *must be received with application to hold dates $500 $500 Application Fee *must be received with application to hold dates $100 $100 Venue Host The Venue Host is the liaison between the renter and Community Theatre and is required for the entire duration of the reservation Light Technician (minimum of four hours required per day) The Light Technician is responsible for setup and operation of all theatre lighting equipment Sound Technician (minimum of four hours required per day) The Sound Technician is responsible for setup and operation of all theatre sound equipment AV Technician (minimum of four hours required per day) The AV Technician is responsible for setup and operation of all projector equipment and is required on site during the use of the projector, in addition to the Sound and Light Technician Theatre Marquee $63 $63 Piano (Baby Grand)$125 $125 Projector $314 $314 Cyclorama or Backdrop $125 $125 Non-Profit Rate Commercial Rate Performance or Rehearsals $28 per hour $33 per hour Security Deposit *must be received with application to hold dates Application Fee *must be received with application to hold dates Venue Host/Technician (required for the entire duration of reservation) Projector and Screen $125 $125 Rounding criteria (effective 9/1/97): If new fee increase is $.50 or less round down to nearest dollar; if new fee increase is $.51 or more, round up to the nearest dollar. ** September 2025 All Urban Consumers CPI Index is 3.5%. Only Fees greater than $15 went up due to the rounding criteria. Billed at T-6 Hourly Rates Billed at T-6 Hourly Rates Billed at T-6 Hourly Rates 2ND STORY THEATRE RESERVATION FEES $250 $250 $28 $28 Billed at T-6 Hourly Rate Billed at T-6 Hourly Rate COMMUNITY THEATRE RESERVATION FEES Billed at T-6 Hourly Rate Billed at T-6 Hourly Rate Billed at T-6 Hourly Rates Billed at T-6 Hourly Rates Billed at T-6 Hourly Rates Page 657 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT F First Second Third + 1 Chapter 5.04, Business Licenses Generally;$250 $500 $1,000 2 Section 6.08.020, Dogs at Large Prohibited in Public Places;$250 $500 $ 1,000 3 Chapter 6.16, Retail Sale of Dogs and Cats;$250 $500 $ 1,000 4 Chapter 8.04, Health Code Adopted;$250 $500 $ 1,000 5 Chapter 8.08, Alarm Systems;$250 $500 $ 1,000 6 Chapter 8.28, Nuisances;$250 $500 $ 1,000 7 Chapter 8.32, Rodent Control;$250 $500 $ 1,000 8 Chapter 8.44, Stormwater and Urban Runoff Pollution Control Regulations;$500 $750 $ 1,000 9 Chapter 12.16, Encroachments (streets and sidewalks);$500 $750 $1,000 10 Section 12.20.050, Animals $250 $500 $ 1,000 11 Paragraphs (A), (U) and (V) of Section 12.28.010, Park Regulations Generally;$250 $500 $ 1,000 12 Chapter 12.32, Newsracks;$250 $500 $ 1,000 13 Section 15.04.140, Pedestrian protection during construction;$250 $500 $ 1,000 14 Sections 15.16.070 and 15.16.080, grease recovery systems;$250 $500 $ 1,000 15 Title 17, Zoning;$250 $500 $ 1,000 15a Title 17, Zoning; Short Term Rentals $5,000 $10,000 $ 20,000 16 Chapter 8.56, Water Conservation and Drought Management Plan;$250 $ 500 $1,000 17 Chapter 8.60, Water Efficient Landscaping;$250 $ 500 $1,000 18 Chapter 8.64, Ban on Certain Polystyrene Products, Certain Single-Use Plastic Products, and Other Single-Use Products;$250 $ 500 $1,000 19 Chapter 8.68, Plastic Carryout Shopping Bags;$250 $ 500 $1,000 20a Chapter 9.28, Parties, Events and Gatherings on Private Property $250 $500 $ 1,000 20b Section 9.28.030 Social host liability for parties at which underage drinking occurs;$2,500 $5,000 $10,000 21 Chapter 10.44, Shared On-Demand Personal Mobility Devices;$250 $ 500 $1,000 22 Chapter 5.78, Tobacco Retailers;$250 $ 500 $1,000 23 Chapter 12.38, Sidewalk Vending;$250 $ 500 $1,000 24 Chapter 12.36, Trees;$250 $ 500 $1,000 Amended and Restated Administrative Citation Fine Schedule 26-Jun-24 Violation Subject to Administrative Citations (Section 1.10.040 (A) HBMC) Violation Current Fine Page 658 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT F First Second Third + Amended and Restated Administrative Citation Fine Schedule 26-Jun-24 Violation Subject to Administrative Citations (Section 1.10.040 (A) HBMC) Violation Current Fine 25 Chapter 5.80, Cannabis Delivery;$ 20,000* $20,000 $ 20,000 26 Title 15, Buildings and Construction;$250 $ 500 $1,000 27 Chapter 8.24, Noise Control.$250 $ 500 $1,000 28 Chapter 12.09 Pavement Moratorium $250 $500 $1,000 29 Chapter 8.12 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal $ 250 $500 $ 1,000 30 Chapter 12.30 Special Events on Public Property $ 250 $500 $ 1,000 31 Section 12.28.030, Permit requirement for outdoor fitness classes in city parks and on the beach $ 250 $500 $ 1,000 32 Chapter 1.06, Custody and Use of the City Seal, Logo, and City Insignia $ 250 $500 $ 1,000 33 Section 10.12.175, Use of electric bicycles and other wheeled devices.$500 $750 $1,000 34 Section 12.20.220, Motorized and electric wheeled devices.$500 $750 $1,000 35 Section 12.20.230, Wheeled vehicles or devices on Strand walkway and Pier Plaza.$500 $750 $1,000 36 Section 12.28.010 (I), Park regulations generally $500 $750 $1,000 37 Chapter 5.82, Rental of Electric Bicycles $250 $500 $750 38 Chapter 8.42 $1,500 $3,000 $5,000 Adoption History Resolution 24-7425 Resolution 24-7433 Resolution 24-7442 City Council Apil 9, 2024 City Council June 4, 2024 (Items 33 to 37) City Council June 25, 2024 (Item 38) *$20,000 per occurrence. The City Manager can approve a partial waiver not to exceed $10,000, for a first-time offense if a true and complete application for a lawful permit is made by the violating business operator. Page 659 of 1002 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT G RATES HERMOSA BEACH, REDONDO BEACH, AND MANHATTAN BEACH BASED NON-PROFIT NON-PROFIT OTHER RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT/ COMMERCIAL NON-REFUNDABLE Application Fee Must be received with application 100.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$ REFUNDABLE Security Deposit* Must be received with application 500.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ Reservation Rate Includes the Banquet Hall 9am-5pm: $41 per hour 5pm-Close: $52 per hour 9am-5pm: $93 per hour 5pm-Close: $103 per hour 9am-5pm: $78 per hour 5pm-Close: $93 per hour 9am-5pm: $279 per hour 5pm-Close: $310 per hour Kitchen Reservation Rate** 9am-5pm: $31 per hour 5pm- Close: $39 per hour 9am-5pm: $70 5pm- Close: $78 per hour 9am-5pm: $60 per hour 5pm-Close: $71 per hour 9am-5pm: $214 per hour 5pm- Close: $238 per hour Meeting Room Reservation Rate** 9am-5pm: $10 per hour 5pm-Close: $12.50 per hour 9am-5pm: $23 5pm-Close: $26 per hour 9am-5pm: $21 per hour 5pm-Close: $25 per hour 9am-5pm: $75 per hour 5pm-Close: $83 per hour Projector and Screen**125.00$ 125.00$ 125.00$ 125.00$ Setup/Teardown Required if tables, chairs, podium, and/ or stage are requested 41.00$ 41.00$ 41.00$ 41.00$ Clark Building Monitor $22 per hour $22 per hour $22 per hour $22 per hour Audiovisual Technician Required if use of audiovisual equipment is requested $34 per hour $34 per hour $34 per hour $34 per hour Amplified Sound Permit**214.00$ 214.00$ 214.00$ 214.00$ Rounding criteria (effective 9/1/97): If new fee increase is $.50 or less round down to nearest dollar; if new fee increase is $.51 or more, round up to the nearest dollar. ** September 2025 All Urban Consumers CPI Index is 3.5%. Only Fees greater than $15 went up due to the rounding criteria. CLARK BUILDING RESERVATION RATES** *Any damage, loss of equipment, or excess time spent by the reservation holder or by City staff to ensure adequate clean-up is completed will be retained from the Security Deposit. If the total exceeds the amount of the Security Deposit, the reservation holder will be billed. Any policy violations may result in a loss of the Security Deposit. Additionally, any fees incurred by the City in connection with clean-up activities and associated repairs as a result of the reservation will be retained from the security deposit. If the total exceeds the amount of the security deposit, the reservation holder will be billed. Policy violations may result in a loss of security deposit. **The kitchen, meeting room, projector and screen, and Amplified Sound Permit are optional amenities available by request. Reservation holders planning to cater are encouraged to choose a Hermosa Beach-based business. Reservation holders with reservations on Fridays and Saturdays may qualify for a 5% discount on hourly reservation rates should they hire a Hermosa Beach based ABC licensed caterer and/or business for catering services. Page 660 of 1002 FEE STUDY UPDATE MAY 12, 2026 Page 661 of 1002 Executive Summary Current fee structure is based largely on the 2016 Fee Study and no longer reflects actual service costs Planning/Building and Public Works fees remain below full cost recovery, resulting in ongoing General Fund subsidies On April 28, 2026, City Council approved most proposed fee updates and directed staff to return with additional review and discussion Page 662 of 1002 Council Feedback Themes •Support for modest or phased increases •Support for tiered fee structures and aligning fees with actual staff time •Interest in refund mechanisms where costs are lower than estimated •Support for lower fees for streamlined or administrative approvals •Concerns regarding outdated processes, small business impacts, and administrative complexity Page 663 of 1002 Process Streamlining & Future Recalibration Reviewing zoning and permitting procedures Expanding administrative approvals where appropriate Reducing Planning Commission involvement for certain applications Identifying workflow efficiencies Future fee reductions may occur where streamlined processes reduce staff time Page 664 of 1002 Staff Recommendation Option 1:Adopt Full Cost Recovery Fees (Staff Recommended) •Align fees with actual cost of service •Reduce General Fund subsidies •Improve long-term fiscal sustainability •Continue process review and return with revised fees as efficiencies are implemented Page 665 of 1002 Additional Council Options Option 2: Adopt Partial Cost Recovery Option 3: Maintain Current Fees Option 4: Defer Select Fee Increases and revisit following process streamlining Provide policy direction regarding subsidy levels and future recalibration Page 666 of 1002 FEE STUDY UPDATE MAY 12, 2026 Page 667 of 1002 Page 668 of 1002 Page 669 of 1002 Fee Study-5.12.26CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHItems highilghted yellow under zoning/process reviewFEE COMPARISONCurrent Suggested Council REF #SERVICE DescriptionCURRENT FEE SUGGESTED FEEFee Fee CommentsDEVELOPMENT SERVICESS-001CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -COMM/OTHERReview of a proposed conditional use permit to establish a commercial or other use to determine conformance with City codes and standards, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment.$6,065 per application $12,800 per application$6,065 $12,800Limit increase (~$2K); revisit with upcoming streamlined zoning/process updates; develop tiered fees based on project complexity; evaluate revised cost under new processS-003CUP/PDP - CONDOReview of a proposed conditional use permit and precise development plan for new condominium development for conformance with City codes and standards, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment.$6,299 per application plus $9,190 per application plus $6,299 $9,190Tie fee to streamlined process updates; reduce fees for small/admin projects (≤2 units); reassess once zoning changes are implemented; support staff recS-003#N/A$233 per unit over 2 units $590 per every 10 units over 2 units$233 $590S‐003BCUP ANNUAL MONITORINGAnnual monitoring of the conditions of a Conditional Use Permit to ensure continued compliance with the conditions.None $570 per annual review$0 $570Clarify purpose, scope, and implementation; considereliminating or charging based strictly on actual stafftime/costS-004ACOASTAL APPROVAL IN-CONCEPTProcessing a approval in concept of a development in the Coastal Zone for compliance with appropriate codes and standards.Administrative Permit alone- $640 per application Administrative Permit with another application - $321Plus $4,776 if a hearing is required.Commercial - $660 per application New Single Family Residence - $700 per application Other Residential - $515 per applicationVaries based on application typeVaries based on application typeMaintain current fee for now; revisit after zoning/process updates; establish tiered structure (minor/standard/complex); consider subsidizing mixed-use projects; support staff recFee ComparisonPage 1 of 6Page 670 of 1002 Fee Study-5.12.26CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHItems highilghted yellow under zoning/process reviewFEE COMPARISONCurrent Suggested Council REF #SERVICE DescriptionCURRENT FEE SUGGESTED FEEFee Fee CommentsS-005TEXT AMENDMENTReview a request to amend the zoning code and/or other titles relating to land use development, including evaluation of internal code consistency and impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment.$7,078 per application$18,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs.$7,078 DepositAgree with staff; waive hourly rates/costs for minor clarifications or outdated wording corrections approved by director.S-006ZONE CHANGEReview a request to amend the zoning map, including evaluation of impacts on the surrounding area, city services, and the environment.$5,055 per application$18,000 deposit with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs.$5,055 $17,421Utilize deposit-based model at 80% allocated rates; allowrefunds if actual staff time is lower than estimatedS-007VARIANCEReview a proposed variance from the regulations or standards in the zoning code or other titles relevant to land use development.$4,674 per application $9,985 per application$4,674 $9,985Increase modestly; revisit after streamlined process implementation; provide timing for future adjustment; support staff recS-008SIGN VARIANCEReview a proposed sign variance from the terms of the zoning code.$3,338 per application $7,980 per application$3,338 $7,980Minimal or no increase; consider converting to ministerial (staff-level) review to reduce cost and processing timeS-009PARKING PLANReview of a proposed plan to provide adequate parking for a development for conformance with City codes and standards.$5,596 per applicationPlanning Review - $8,240 per application Other Department Review - Deposit determined by staff with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any contract costs.$5,596 $8,241Create tiered structure based on complexity; consider phased increases over time; revisit following process improvementsS-013FINAL MAPReview a final map for conformance with the Subdivision Map Act, tentative map, and City codes and standards.$875 per map $3,315 per map$875 $3,315Phase in increases; create reduced fee tier for projects already subject to County review/approvals; support staff recFee ComparisonPage 2 of 6Page 671 of 1002 Fee Study-5.12.26CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHItems highilghted yellow under zoning/process reviewFEE COMPARISONCurrent Suggested Council REF #SERVICE DescriptionCURRENT FEE SUGGESTED FEEFee Fee CommentsS-017MURAL REVIEWReview of a proposed mural for conformance with City codes and standards by the Planning Commission.$578 per application $3,010 per application$578 $3,010Keep fees low; shift to administrative approval to reduce staff time and cost; revisit after process changesS-018TEMPORARY USE PERMITReview of a proposed temporary use for conformance with City codes and standards and impacts on the surrounding area and city services, such as construction trailers and seasonal sales.$589 per applicationTemporary Seasonal Sales - $805 per application Temporary Minor Special Event - $1,900 per application Date Change - $335 per application$589Varies based on application typeReevaluate due to recently streamlined process; reduce fees,especially for repeat annual events; create discountedcategory for repeat applicants; revise date change fee. S-018AM-1 ZONE LIMITED EVENTS PERMITReview of a proposed Limited Event in the M-1 Zone for conformance with City codes and standards and impacts on the surrounding area and city services.$520 per application $1,100 per application$520 $1,100Generally aligned with staff recommendation; consider slight reduction (~$800 level)S-024PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATIONRequest for an interpretation of a zoning code requirement by the Planning Commission.$1,857 per application $3,015 per application$1,857 $3,015Ensure fee reflects actual staff time; allow refunds if less time is used; some preference for no increase; support staff recS-030PLANNING SIGN PERMITReview an individual sign application for conformance with City codes and standards.$795 per application $1,395 per application$795 $1,395Generally supported; some preference for minimal or noincrease; consider ministerial processingS-030APLANNING A-FRAME SIGN PERMITReview an individual A-Frame sign application for conformance with City codes and standards.New - $201 per application New - $250 per application$201 $250Maintain structure; reduce annual renewal fee (suggested ~$50); maintain enforcement and control mechanismsS-030AAnnual Renewal - $121 per renewal Annual Renewal - $110 per renewal$121 $110S-033ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMITReview an administrative use permit for conformance with City codes and standards.$621 per application $2,100 per application$621 $2,100S-033Temp Minor Special Event (Expedited 3 Day Review) - 200% x feeTemp Minor Special Event (Expedited 3 Day Review) - 200% x feeClarify difference from S-018 and confirm S-003 applies to special use permits; keep staff recommendation.Fee ComparisonPage 3 of 6Page 672 of 1002 Fee Study-5.12.26CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHItems highilghted yellow under zoning/process reviewFEE COMPARISONCurrent Suggested Council REF #SERVICE DescriptionCURRENT FEE SUGGESTED FEEFee Fee CommentsS-034ADMIN PERMIT - ABANDON CUPReview an administrative use permit for abandonment of an existing Conditional Use Permit for conformance with City codes and standards.$802 per application $1,740 per application$802 $1,740Align fee with actual staff time; allow refunds if time required is less than estimatedS-040APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCILReview an appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission, or as otherwise specified by the code, to the City Council.$2,179 per appeal plus: Second Noticing: Residential 300' Radius - $301 Legal Ad - $201 Poster - $226 Total - $728 Non-Residential 500' Radius - $668 Legal Ad - $201 Poster - $226 Total - $1,095$5,170 per appeal plus actual noticing/advertising costs$2,179 $5,170Generally supported; some input suggests moderate increase(~$1,000); maintain cost recovery fornoticing/administrationS-050HISTORIC RESOURCE REVIEWReview of a removal of historic designation or Certificate of Appropriateness issued by the City Council, or an administrative review of a Certificate of Appropriateness for conformance with City codes and standards.Minor Certification - $1,016 Minor Certification - $1,880$1,016 $1,880Lower fees for nominating and applying for major historicalsources to encourage community-benefiting activity, whileincreasing fees for withdrawals and historical resourcedeterminations.S-050Major Certification - $2,752 Major Certification - $4,005$2,752 $4,005S-050Nomination - $3,152 Nomination - $4,620$3,152 $4,620S-050Removal - $5,244 Removal - $4,610$5,244 $4,610Keep consistent fees across categories; consider raisingremoval fee and lowering others to encourage landmarkdeterminations.S-050Waiver of 90% of fees available (limited to 2 waivers per fiscal year)Waiver of 90% of fees available (limited to 2 waivers per fiscal year)Fee ComparisonPage 4 of 6Page 673 of 1002 Fee Study-5.12.26CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHItems highilghted yellow under zoning/process reviewFEE COMPARISONCurrent Suggested Council REF #SERVICE DescriptionCURRENT FEE SUGGESTED FEEFee Fee CommentsFee ComparisonPage 5 of 6Page 674 of 1002 Fee Study-5.12.26CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHItems highilghted yellow under zoning/process reviewFEE COMPARISONCurrent Suggested Council REF #SERVICE DescriptionCURRENT FEE SUGGESTED FEEFee Fee CommentsPUBLIC WORKSS-080RESIDENTIAL ENCROACHMENT PERMITReview and inspection of a request for a residential permanent encroachment in the public right-of-way.$1,536 per permit $2,760 per permit$1,536 $2,760Clarify applicability, purpose, and scope; some support no incS‐081BFOOD TRUCK PERMITReview and inspection of a request for the operation of a food truck in the public right‐of‐way, including City Council review.None Initial ‐ $3,635$0 $3,635Eliminate.Annual Renewal ‐ $225$0 $225New food truck permit should be separately reviewed/approvS-081CA-FRAME ENCROACHMENT PERMITReview and inspection of a request for the placement of an A-Frame sign in the public right-of-way.$339 per permit $460 per permit$339 $460Clarify overlap with Planning A-Frame permit; evaluate need S-084GSIDEWALK VENDING PERMITReview of a temporary sidewalk encroachment of a merchandise vendor for compliance with City codes and standards. $406 - Initial PermitPreliminary Application (Per Location) - $255Final Application (Per Location) - $255$406 $510Eliminate Pier Plaza as a permitted sidewalk vendinglocation. Keep fees unchanged, as the permit’s benefitsalready outweigh the cost and involve use of public property.$406 - Annual Renewal Renewal - $335$406 $335Raise sidewalk vending fee to $900/year; account for violationFee ComparisonPage 6 of 6Page 675 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 9 Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-AS-054 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council DEPARTMENT FY 2026-2027 BUDGET PRESENTATIONS (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Receive and File Department Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-2027 Budget Presentations; and 2. Provide direction on a preferred approach to addressing the upcoming FY 2026- 2027 structural deficit, including consideration of a balanced strategy incorporating expenditure reductions and revenue enhancements to minimize impacts to community services. Executive Summary: The FY 2026-27 budget outlook, presented on April 28, 2026, identified an estimated structural deficit of approximately $3.2 million. Since that time, staff has developed a plan to address the shortfall and achieve a preliminary FY 2027 balanced budget. However, this plan does not fully account for several significant, yet uncertain, upcoming cost pressures, including: 1) potential increases in County contract costs for fire services, lifeguards, and beach maintenance; and 2) major unfunded Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs), such as the public service yard and pier. To prepare for these uncertainties, departments have developed proposed reductions of up to 10% for City Council consideration. While not all reductions are recommended, these options are intended as options for City Council consideration to: Provide additional funding to address anticipated County cost increases and other contract service increases. Provide an additional “buffer” to maintain balanced budgets beyond 2026 -2027. Some departments were able to find a 10% budget reduction by reducing current costs without reducing workforce. Others could not reach their 10% reduction without impacting workforce and contract services. While staff is not recommending any workforce reductions at this time outside of attrition and/or vancancies, staff feels it is important to Page 676 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 9 have a conversation as to what such cuts would look like and how they would impact current service levels. Departments will outline core services, staffing, operational priorities, key challenges, and opportunities for efficiency and revenue generation, along with “above and beyond” services and associated reduction scenarios. After accounting for these expenditure constraints and contingencies, City Council will be presented with additional revenue options, including but not limited to expanding the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) base, increasing the TOT rate, pursuing a sales tax measure, implementing additional parking metering, and other strategies. Together, these actions are intended to guide City Council toward a balanced, sustainable approach to addressing the FY27 deficit while managing future fiscal uncertainty. Past Board, Commission, and City Council Actions Meeting Date Description March 24, 2026 City Council received an initial overview of the FY27 budget framework and provided direction to address an emerging structural deficit through a mix of revenue and expenditure strategies. April 28, 2026 City Council reviewed the FY27 fiscal outlook, including a projected ~$3.2M deficit, and the need to shift from one-time solutions to long-term structural balance. Analysis: FY 27 Structural Deficit Solution To address the FY27 structural deficit, staff has implemented a balanced budget strategy that avoids immediate service reductions primarily by pausing contributions to the Equipment Replacement Fund which includes deferring all vehicle purchases in the upcoming fiscal year, and pausing the contingency allocation previously used to maintain the City’s 20% General Fund reserve target. This approach resolves the City’s fiscal imbalance in the near term while continue to maintain projected General Fund reserves above 16%, consistent with the Government Financ e Officers Association (GFOA) recommended minimum. Staff is continuing to review and find operational budget reductions where possible. Upcoming Unfunded Needs and Department Reduction Scenarios While the FY27 deficit is addressed, the City continues to face significant and ongoing fiscal pressures. These include escalating Los Angeles County contract costs, approximately $3.1 million in FY26–2027 and $1.6 million ongoing annually, for fire services, lifeguards, and beach maintenance. In addition, there are substantial unfunded Capital Improvement Program (CIP) needs, with no dedicated ongoing General Fund Page 677 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 9 revenue stream to support core infrastructure such as street and sidewalk repairs, as well as major projects including the City Yard and Pier. To help prepare for these uncertainties, departments evaluated potential reductions of up to 10% of their General Fund budgets. An across-the-board 10% operational reduction would result in approximately $5 million in savings excluding the Los Angeles County contracts and Fire related expenditures. While not currently implemented, these scenarios demonstrate the level of action that may be required to address future cost increases or revenue shortfalls. Given the City’s lean organizational structure , many expenditures are directly tied to service delivery. As a result, reductions of this magnitude would lead to noticeable impacts to community services. Departments would need to prioritize core and legally required functions, often at the expense of proactive programs, service levels, and community- facing enhancements. In key areas such as public safety, this would likely mean a shift toward maintaining basic emergency response capabilities, with fewer resources available for prevention, enforcement, and quality-of-life services. The following outlines each department’s core services and the effects of a 10% reduction. Police Core Services: 24/7 patrol and emergency response, including beach and downtown areas Investigations, crime prevention, and community policing Major Potential Reductions: Reduce costs through cuts to training, contract services, equipment replacement funding, and overtime, limiting specialty training opportunities, delaying equipment replacement cycles, and reducing overtime-supported enforcement and event coverage. Freezing 5 police officer positions and 1 community service officer position, reducing patrol staffing, traffic enforcement, mental health and homeless response services, special event coverage, and community outreach capacity. 10% Reduction Impact Shift toward maintaining basic emergency response capabilities only Reduced staffing for proactive policing in high-activity areas (Pier Plaza, beach, and neighborhoods) Reduced traffic enforcement and pedestrian safety initiatives Page 678 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 9 Decreased e-bike enforcement and education efforts, particularly along The Strand and downtown corridors Limited staffing for special events, impacting public safety presence and crowd management Reduced investigative capacity and follow-up on cases Longer response times for non-emergency calls Public Works Core Services: Maintenance of streets, sidewalks, alleys, and coastal infrastructure (including The Strand) Stormwater management, beach-related maintenance, and environmental compliance Fleet, facilities, and public right-of-way upkeep Major Potential Reductions: Reduce contract funding for street, sidewalk, traffic infrastructure, and public right-of-way maintenance services. Reduce consultant and contractor support for engineering, capital improvement project delivery, and construction management services. Reduce contract services supporting landscaping, facility maintenance, and specialized repair operations. Reduce technical and operational support contracts related to regulatory compliance, emergency response, and peak workload assistance. 10% Reduction Impact Delayed repairs to high-use areas, including beach paths, sidewalks, and alleys Reduced maintenance frequency in high-traffic visitor areas Slower response to service requests, including those affecting pedestrian safety Increased long-term infrastructure deterioration Parks and Recreation Core Services Recreation programs for youth, adults, and seniors Park and facility operations, including beach-adjacent spaces Community events and programming that support Hermosa Beach’s identity Page 679 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 9 Major Potential Reductions: Reduce costs through part-time staffing reductions, operational cuts, and shifting responsibilities to the Special Events team, potentially slowing permit processing and program support services. Increase revenue through expanded recreation programs, special event permits, facility rentals, and updated user fees. 10% Reduction Impact Fewer classes, camps, and recreational programs Increased fees or reduced subsidies for participants Scaled-back or eliminated community events, including those that drive tourism and local activity Reduced staffing support for special events, impacting setup, operations, and safety coordination Decline in park and facility maintenance levels Community Development Core Services: Planning, zoning, and coastal development oversight Development review, permitting, and business support Building inspections and code enforcement Major Potential Reductions: Reduce funding for contracted Willdan planning and building review services, limiting the City’s ability to supplement staffing during peak development and permit activity periods. Reduced consultant support could affect the City’s ability to keep pace with code compliance reviews, special project processing, permit turnaround times, and timely responses to applicants and developers. 10% Reduction Impact Longer permit processing times for residential and commercial projects Reduced code enforcement responsiveness, including for short-term rentals and coastal activity impacts Delays in development and local economic activity City Manager’s Office Core Services: Citywide leadership and implementation of City Council priorities Strategic planning and regional/coastal coordination Communication and organizational oversight Page 680 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 6 of 9 Major Potential Reductions: Eliminate the City Manager’s Office intern position, reducing staff support for social media management, community outreach, public communications, content creation, and administrative support for engagement initiatives. Transfer Emergency Management and Environmental Services staff to operating departments to provide more direct operational support for emergency preparedness coordination, regulatory compliance, sustainability initiatives, grant support, and department-level project implementation. Reduce coaching, professional development, and training expenses. Reallocate Green Business Initiative funding from sustainability outreach and business support programs toward higher-impact City projects and operational priorities. 10% Reduction Impact Reduced capacity to advance key initiatives, including public safety and mobility improvements Slower implementation of City Council priorities Less coordination across departments, particularly for cross-cutting issues like beach operations and events Administrative Services Core Services: Budgeting, accounting, and financial reporting Human resources, recruitment, and labor relations Risk management and employee benefits Front public counter for incoming revenue including parking permits Major Potential Reductions: Eliminate one Accounting Clerk position within Revenue Services, reducing support for business license processing, cash handling, account reconciliation, payment processing, and customer service functions. Downgrade the Human Resources Analyst position and eliminate the HR Intern position, reducing capacity for recruitment support, onboarding, benefits administration, risk analysis and managem ent, policy research, and personnel-related administrative processing. 10% Reduction Impact Prolonged recruitment process and slower hiring, affecting critical staffing such as police, public works, and event support Page 681 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 7 of 9 Reduced financial oversight / audits and long-term financial planning capacity Delayed customer service response to parking and business licensing issues Increased City risk related to compliance with Federal, state and local laws City Clerk Core Services: Agenda management and legislative support Records management and public transparency Elections administration Major Potential Reductions: Leave the Senior Office Assistant position unfilled, shifting agenda preparation, records management, public records requests, meeting coordination, legal noticing, document processing, and customer service responsibilities remaining with City Clerk staff. 10% Reduction Impact Slower response to public records requests Reduced support for City Council meetings and legislative processes Potential impacts to transparency and reporting timelines ***Revenue Considerations: Following City Council’s consideration of expenditure reduction strategies, including potential departmental reductions of up to 10%, the City may evaluate a range of revenue options to address ongoing structural imbalances and future cost pressures. As outlined in the FY27 fiscal outlook, the City’s current revenue structure is constrained by limited growth and high reliance on tourism-related activity, while expenditures, particularly for labor, County contracts, and infrastructure, continue to rise. To support long-term fiscal sustainability and reduce reliance on service-level reductions, City Council may consider a mix of locally controlled and voter-approved revenue strategies. These include: Expanding and enforcing the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), particularly through short-term rental compliance and potential rate adjustments Pursuing a local sales tax measure, where each quarter-cent increment could generate approximately $1 million annually Enhancing parking and mobility revenue through dynamic pricing, expan ded metering (Monterey Blvd., Manhattan Ave, and/or other high demand areas). Page 682 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 8 of 9 Additional options include optimizing City-owned assets through leases or development opportunities, modernizing assessments such as landscaping and lighting districts, and evaluating updated stormwater fees to reduce ongoing General Fund subsidies. Together, these options provide a framework for City Council to consider how best to balance service levels, infrastructure needs, and long-term financial stability following direction on expenditure reductions. ***Staff will provide more details and background on these potential revenue enhancements at the May 26 , 2026, City Council meeting. Options for City Council Consideration: Based on the FY27 outlook and department analysis, City Council may consider the following options to address near-term and ongoing fiscal challenges. Feedback from the May 5 joint Parks and Recreation and Public Works Commission meeting on CIP priorities will be incorporated into a CIP study session with City Council on May 28, 2026. 1.) Maintain the FY27 balanced budget approach while monitoring County contract costs and reserves 2.) Implement targeted or across-the-board reductions (up to 10%) to build contingency 3.) Phase in reductions to prepare for rising fire, lifeguard, and beach maintenance costs 4.) Pursue revenue enhancements (e.g., TOT, sales tax, parking metering) 5.) Direct staff to develop a multi-year fiscal strategy Fiscal Impact: The upcoming FY 2026-2027 General Fund budget is projected to be balanced through a combination of expenditure adjustments, including pausing contributions to the Equipment Replacement Fund, deferring vehicle purchases, and reducing contingency allocations, while maintaining General Fund reserves above the GFOA 16% (2 month) recommended minimum of operating expenditures. While no immediate General Fund impact is associated with receiving and filing the department presentations, future fiscal impacts will depend on City Council direction. Potential actions include expenditure reductions of up to 10% (estimated at approximately $5 million in savings) and/or the implementation of new or enhanced revenue measures. The City also faces significant future cost pressures, including potential increases in County contract costs for fire, lifeguard, and beach maintenance services, as well as substantial unfunded capital improvement needs, which may require additional resources or policy decisions in future fiscal years. Page 683 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 9 of 9 Attachments: None Respectfully Submitted by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 684 of 1002 FY 27 BUDGET DEPARTMENT PRESENTATIONS MAY 12, 2026 Page 685 of 1002 FY27 Budget Overview •FY27 projected structural deficit of approximately $3.2 million •Balanced FY27 budget achieved through: Pausing Equipment Replacement Fund contributions and deferring vehicle purchases Reducing 20% reserve allocations Operational efficiencies •Significant fiscal pressures remain, including rising County contract costs and unfunded capital needs •Balanced approach of expenditure management and revenue enhancements, including evaluation of potential revenue strategies •City Council direction requested on future fiscal strategy and priorities Page 686 of 1002 Department Overview Overview of core City services and operational priorities Summary of department functions, staffing, and service delivery responsibilities Department reduction proposals and associated service-level considerations Identification of key operational and fiscal challenges, efficiency opportunities, and long-term sustainability initiatives Page 687 of 1002 POLICE DEPARTMENT Page 688 of 1002 POLICE & COMMUNITY SERVICES PERSONNEL 38 Sworn Police Officers (Includes Command Staff) 14 Professional Staff (Includes PSOs and Administrative Staff) 15 Community Services Staff (Includes 2 Supervisors and 1 Professional Staff) Page 689 of 1002 PATROL SERVICES •Calls for Service •Crime Reports •Field Investigations •9-1-1 Front Line Emergency Response Page 690 of 1002 INVESTIGATIONS & ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES •Jail Management •Records Administration •Property and Evidence •Investigations o Follow up on crime reports, Field Investigations, Operations, Federal Partnerships o Victim Outreach / Advocacy o Case filings with District Attorney/City Prosecutor Page 691 of 1002 COMMUNITY SERVICES •Meter Enforcement •Parking Management •Towing Services •Animal Control Page 692 of 1002 DEPARTMENT BUDGET •Total Budget: $21.8M •10% Reduction Goal: $2.1M Police Department and Community Services combined •Total Budget: $6.3M •10% Reduction Goal: $630,000 Police Department and Community Services combined without salaries and benefits Page 693 of 1002 SCENARIO 110% REDUCTION WITHOUT SALARIES AND BENEFITS •Reduce costs to Conferences/Training, Contract Services, Equipment Replacement Fund (ERF) and Overtime: o $261,000 (Conf / Training / Contract Services) o $200,000 (ERF reduction) o $169,000 (OT reduction) o Total = $630,000 (Meets the 10% reduction goal) Page 694 of 1002 SCENARIO 110% REDUCTION WITHOUT SALARIES AND BENEFITS •Impact to Department / Services Only mandated training will be accommodated Career development / specialty training suspended Equipment service life will be extended, maintenance and repair costs will rise Reduction in overtime •Fewer specialized enforcement details Page 695 of 1002 SCENARIO 210% REDUCTION TO OVERALL BUDGET •Reduce costs to Conference/Training, Contract Services, Equipment Replacement Fund (Scenario 1); and •Freeze 5 Police Officer (PO) positions •Freeze 1 Community Service Officer (CSO) position Page 696 of 1002 IMPACT TO SERVICES Minimum Staffing for Patrol and Community Services Elimination of Traffic Unit and Crime Impact Team Reduction in Mental Health (MET)/Homeless Service (HERO) Reduction in Special Event Staffing Reduction in Mutual Aid Assistance Retention of Current Employees Lack of Career Enhancement Employee Fatigue Slower Response Time Reduced Community Outreach and EngagementPage 697 of 1002 PATROL SERVICES –CURRENT STAFFING 23 Patrol Officers | 7-Day Coverage (Day/Night Shift) Minimum: 1 Watch Commander + 2 Patrol Cars per shift 21,386 6,430 11,799 Calls for Service Calendar Year 2025 Traffic Stops Calendar Year 2025 Weekend Calls (Fri –Sun) 55% of all calls Page 698 of 1002 PATROL SERVICES –CURRENT STAFFING Traffic Unit/ Crime Impact Team (CIT)and Special Assignments (OT) provide additional service capacity beyond core patrol Combined Service Impact | Traffic/ CIT handle/ SA: 4,046 of 21,584 calls (19%) 2,038 19%174 Traffic/ CIT/ Special Units Traffic Stops (31.6% of all stops) Service Capacity if units eliminated Accident Investigations Page 699 of 1002 PATROL SERVICES –10% REDUCTION 21,386 4,046 MET 19% Calls for Service Calendar Year 2025 Calls Lost Minimum Staffing Service Capacity Reduction 4,046 TOTAL LOST CALLS Core Patrol 17,348 calls 81.1%Retained Traffic/ CIT/ Special Assignments (OT) 3,933 calls 18.4% reduction Lost –CIT disbanded, no special detail overtime authorized Traffic Unit Stops/ Accident Investigatons 1,184 18.4% reduction in traffic stops Lost –unit disbanded, no replacement Page 700 of 1002 PATROL SERVICES –10% REDUCTION Response time benchmarks, service level targets, and traffic enforcement capacity will decline, and reduction of overtime will remove ability to respond to demand spikes. 11,799 2,081 2-3 +21.4% Total Weekend Calls (Fri –Sun) Weekend calls lost Officer per weekend shift (no OT) Per officer load increase (weekend) FINDINGS FOR COUNCIL Staffing minimums –Maintained Service Capacity –18.6% Reduction Traffic Enforcement –2,038 Stops Lost No buffer for major incident, enhanced enforcement, or special events. No flexibility. Page 701 of 1002 COMMUNITY SERVICES 2025 –12 CSO's o 50,140 Parking citations o 57 Administrative citations o 486 vehicles impounded •Calls for Service o 2,586 Parking o 1,678 Animal Control o 1,375 Other •Hosted and participated in 15 community events Page 702 of 1002 REVENUE & EFFICIENCY Goal: Public safety and compliance •Enforcement is a mechanism to gain compliance •Full cost recovery for Officers/CSO's assigned to special events •Parking ALPR's -Improved efficiency to parking management Page 703 of 1002 PUBLIC WORKS Page 704 of 1002 Core Services Streets & Traffic Maintenance & repair, traffic signals, street lighting, street signs & markings, roadway safety, Caltrans. Sewer System Hydro flushing, pump station maintenance, CCTV inspection, monitoring and inspections, repair. Storm Drain Stormwater compliance, catch basin cleaning, beach outfall maintenance. Parks, Medians, & Trees Landscape and tree maintenance (22 parks and parkettes, the beach, 2000+ city owned trees), courts, playing fields, the Pier. Facilities Buildings, parking lots, janitorial, HVAC, fire alarm, elevator, pest control, data and electrical, ADA. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)Planning, design, construction, administration. Fleet & Equipment ManagementMaintenance, repair, purchase, outfitting, electric charging, CNG.Page 705 of 1002 Core Services After Hours Services (i.e., overtime) •24/7 on-call services; •Emergency response (storms, natural disaster response, flooding, sewer back up, etc.) •After-hours construction oversight. Land Development •Plan check services •Encroachment permits (residential, retail, dining, street vending, banner permits, etc.), •Tree removal and installation. Utility Coordination & Permitting Water, telecom, wireless services, etc. Permitting, construction oversight, undergrounding. Public Works Commission Meetings every other month, tree removal public hearings, other matters referred to Commission. Special Assessment DistrictsAnnual Lighting and Landscape and Sewer Levy. Waste Management & Street Cleaning Trash collection, sweeping, steam cleaning. Page 706 of 1002 Above & Beyond Work •Responsiveness to Resident requests – (over 4,000 GoHermosa/work order requests annually) •Public counter service aligned with business hours •CIP completion – tripled completion rate since FY 23-24 •Beautification projects •Enhancements to facilities & parks through supplemental projects and CIP •Special projects (e.g. Hermosa Beach Little Leage MOU at Clark Field) •New special event support •Accessible beach mat program •Electric charging stations •Memorial bench program Page 707 of 1002 Key Challenges •Deferred maintenance – projects reaching critical state (e.g., City Yard, Pier, etc.) •CIP Structurally underfunded •PW workload is full •Staffing levels •New requests, special projects, and events •Expiring maintenance contracts & rising costs •Unplanned work, emergencies, storms Page 708 of 1002 10% Reduction + Impacts •Reduce engineering technical and contract services support - reduced CIP delivery, program delivery, review of traffic engineering requests, and regulatory compliance. •Reduce maintenance contract services (e.g. landscape, trees, janitorial, beach) – reduced service levels in high traffic visitor areas. •Reduced supplemental and maintenance budget requests – fewer facilities improvements and beautification projects, increased long-term infrastructure deterioration. Page 709 of 1002 10% Reduction + Impacts •Deferred fleet replacement – potential increase in maintenance needs and vehicles out of service. •Reduced landscape budget – fewer new plantings and trees. •Reduced overtime – fewer special projects and event support, delayed repair. •Reduced training/conferences – staff retention and professional development. Page 710 of 1002 Revenue & Efficiency Revenue: •Updated Fees to capture cost recovery. •Electric charging stations – replace equipment to allow collection of fees or remove (staff releasing RFP summer 2026). •Increase street lighting and landscape district assessment fee – requires citywide ballot in compliance with Proposition 218. Efficiency: •Continued focus on deferred maintenance verses new / enhancement projects to reduce long term operating costs. •Reduce power consumption (LED streetlight conversion, window upgrades at Community Center, potential free solar panel installation through Clean Power Alliance). •Online permitting – enhance efficiency. Page 711 of 1002 PARKS & RECREATION Page 712 of 1002 Core Services •In-house Recreation Programs & Community Events o Youth, Adult, and Senior Programming, Excursions, Signature Events •Contract Programs & Community Partnerships o Classes, Camps, Leagues and Agreements •Facility & Open Space Management o Parks, Beach, Fields, Courts, and Community Buildings o Special Events Permit Program o Film/Still Photo Permit Program (includes private property) Page 713 of 1002 What Must Be Maintained •Required oversight of public space use o parks, beach, facilities – programs, events, contracts, agreements •Core community services o serve residents of all ages for high quality of life Page 714 of 1002 Staffing Overview •8 Full-Time Staff o At this level 20 years ago Expanded services and facility oversight since then •Approx. 25 part-time staff o Program coverage and after-hours operations Page 715 of 1002 Above & Beyond Work •Work beyond core services o Policy development and strategic initiatives, program evaluations o Community issue response & problem solving o Program & revenue optimization o Partnership development & negotiations o Special projects & Council directed work o Cost recovery – Public Works and Police Department services o Parking Revenue Generation Page 716 of 1002 10% Reduction o Operational Efficiencies (software transition) o Part-time Staffing Adjustments (reassignment & scheduling) o Targeted Reductions (materials, advertising, training) Page 717 of 1002 Key Challenges •Revenue and Cost recovery gaps o Uncollected Special Event Revenue ($209,500) o PARK After School Program Deficit Action: •Special Event Policy Guide and Fee Updates (Council review May 26) •Park After School Program Fee Update (Commission review June 2) Page 718 of 1002 Revenue & Efficiency •Adult Sports Leagues (New): +$27,880 •Special Event Permits: o +$82,000 (Nike +$65,500 | LA Galaxy +$16,500) •Rentals: o Community Center Rooms: +$12,500 o Community Center Gymnasium Rentals: +$25,000 o Pickleball Memberships: +$2,500 o Pickleball Reservations: +$46,000 Page 719 of 1002 Revenue & Efficiency Continued.. •New Recreation Software Implementation o Improved user access & reduced administrative burden Future Revenue Opportunities •Special Event Fee Updates (Council – May 26) •Pickleball Fee Adjustments (Council – May 12) •PARK After School Program & Valley Park Day Camp Fee Updates (Commission – June 2) •Tennis Fee Adjustments (TBD) •Field and Park Reservation Fee Adjustments (TBD) •Outdoor Fitness Permit Program Review (TBD) •Expand Park Reservation Areas (TBD) Page 720 of 1002 Proposed FY 2026-27 Budget •Proposed Expenses o $2,441,278 o $101,240 – Concert Series •Proposed Revenues o $1,879,885 o Cost Recovery/Revenue for other Departments: $120,000 o Total: $1,999,885 Page 721 of 1002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Page 722 of 1002 Department Overview Planning: Entitlement processing, plan check, administrative permits, General Plan implementation, new policy development Building: Plan check, permitting, inspections, residential building reports Code Enforcement: investigations, inspections, citations Core Services: 13 FTE across 3 divisions: public counter; staff to the Planning Commission; comprehensive development services; inspections and enforcement. Page 723 of 1002 Core Services by-the-numbers •Entitlement Cases Processed – 35 •Administrative Permits and Zoning Letters – 46 •Plan Checks – 197, 98% completed within 10-14 days •Permits Issued – 1,435 •Building Inspections completed –2,726 •Code Enforcement complaints received – 796, with 230 open cases and 566 cases closed •Documents prepared for digital access –4,380 •Customers assisted at the counter –2,322 Data from internal sources 4/25-4/26 Page 724 of 1002 Dept Budget + 10% Reduction Current Budget in Round Numbers -10%Proposed ‘27 Salaries/Benefits $ 2,000,000 $ 20,000 $ 1,980,000 Contract Services $ 750,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 Overhead + Materials, Supplies $ 250,000 $ 30,000 $ 220,000 TOTAL $ 3,000,000 $ 2,700,000 10% Reduction $ 300,000 Page 725 of 1002 Key Challenges Budget cuts will impact service delivery •Loss of PT funding will eliminate the staff position supporting Housing Element Implementation. •Loss of contract services funding will constrain ability to fill staffing gaps, increase processing times and reduce counter hours. •Loss of training and conference funding reduces staff development and engagement with professional organizations. Page 726 of 1002 Service Delivery Budget impact service delivery Legal Mandates • Prioritze Plan Checks for Residential Development •Priorize Entitlement Processing Reduced Customer Service •Reduced Counter Hours •Extended Plan Check Time Lines (Non- Residential and Residential Remodel) Reduced Staff Capacity •Ordinance Updates •Policy Work •Special Projects Page 727 of 1002 Revenue & Efficiency •Adopting the update to the Master Fee Schedule will improve cost recovery rates for many Department Activities •Technology improvements will enable citation processing and collections •Continued investment in Accela will create a cascade of efficiency improvements in the permitting process. Page 728 of 1002 CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE Page 729 of 1002 City Manager Core Services Strategic Oversight •Implementation of City Council Vision •Communications & Community Engagement •LA County Negotiations •Grants Management •Legislative Affairs •Economic Development •Homelessness •Special Projects Technology & Performance Management •Information Technology •Mapping & GIS Services •Parking Technology •Performance Management •System Modernization •Accessibility Page 730 of 1002 Staffing Overview 5 Total Staff Members o 5.0 FTE o 0.5 Part-time Structural Reorganization: o Environmental Programs Manager -> Public Works o Emergency Management Coordinator -> Administrative Services o Management Analyst -> Community Development (50/50 share) Page 731 of 1002 Above & Beyond Work + 10% Reduction •Work beyond core services include: o Homelessness o New Revenue Development & Implementation o Citywide Project Management & Coordination •What would be reduced or eliminated under a 10% cut: o PIO Contract Services (Not Recommended) o Communications & Community Engagement (Not Recommended) o Intern (Not Recommended) Page 732 of 1002 Key Challenges •“Domino Effect” o Communication delays o Grant management losses o Special projects requested by City Council delays o Delays in inter-department support services o Reduction in time dedicated to revenue generation proposals Page 733 of 1002 Revenue & Efficiency •Revenue Generation Ideas o Think Tank for Revenue Generation •Efficiency Improvements o Parking Technology Improvements o Administrative Citations Digitization o Performance Management Dashboards Citywide Page 734 of 1002 CITY CLERK Page 735 of 1002 Department Overview •Core Services: Agenda management, legislative support, records management, public transparency, elections administration, public records requests, and legal noticing •Department Support: City Council meeting administration, Brown Act compliance, official City records management, and public counter/customer service support Page 736 of 1002 10% Reduction Scenario •Leave the Senior Office Assistant position unfilled •Shift agenda preparation, records management, public records requests, meeting coordination, legal noticing, document processing, and customer service responsibilities to remaining staff Page 737 of 1002 Service Delivery Impacts •Slower response to public records requests •Reduced support for City Council meetings and legislative processes •Potential impacts to transparency and reporting timelines •Operational Response: Continue utilizing technology and digital records management tools to improve efficiency and maintain service levels where possible Page 738 of 1002 Key Challenges •Increasing public records and transparency demands •Maintaining legislative compliance and reporting timelines •Limited staffing capacity for meeting coordination and records management •Balancing growing administrative demands with operational efficiency •Maintaining service levels during increased Council and community activity Page 739 of 1002 Revenue & Efficiency •Continued expansion of digital records management and agenda processing •Improved electronic document workflows and records accessibility •Streamlined agenda preparation and public records request tracking •Technology improvements to support operational efficiency and transparency Page 740 of 1002 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Page 741 of 1002 Department Overview Finance: Budgeting, accounting, payroll, and audits Human Resources / Risk Management: Recruitment, benefits, employee relations, and risk management Revenue Services: Cashiering, business licenses, parking permits, and customer service Core Services: Financial management and compliance; citywide operational support; revenue collection and public services; long-term planning and process improvements Page 742 of 1002 10% Reduction Scenario Page 743 of 1002 Service Delivery Impacts Slower recruitment and hiring timelines Reduced financial oversight and long-term planning capacity Delayed customer service response times Increased compliance and operational risk Operational Response: Utilize technology and process improvements to streamline operations and maintain service levels where possible Page 744 of 1002 Key Challenges •Rising personnel, benefit, and operational costs •Increasing regulatory and compliance demands •Difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified finance and accounting professionals •Limited staffing capacity to support growing citywide needs •Maintaining service levels while addressing long-term fiscal pressures Page 745 of 1002 Revenue & Efficiency New ERP implementation will modernize citywide financial, payroll, procurement, and reporting processes Improved automation and data integration will increase efficiency and coordination across departments Existing technology investments are already creating efficiencies that support staff reorganization and long-term cost savings Expanded digital services and streamlined workflows improve customer service and operational flexibility Page 746 of 1002 Revenue Strategy Considerations •Expanded Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) •Short-term rental compliance •Potential TOT rate adjustments •Local sales tax measure •Expanded parking metering •Dynamic parking pricing •City-owned asset optimization •Assessment district modernization •Stormwater fee evaluation Page 747 of 1002 Strategic Options for City Council 1.Maintain current FY27 balanced budget approach 2.Build additional contingency reserves 3.Phase in future fiscal adjustments 4.Pursue new revenue enhancements, with additional detail and analysis to be presented by staff on May 26, 2026 5.Develop a multi-year fiscal sustainability plan Page 748 of 1002 FY 27 BUDGET DEPARTMENT PRESENTATIONS MAY 12, 2026 Page 749 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 10 Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PR-018 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY (Senior Recreation Supervisor Brian Sousa) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council review and consider the feasibility of designating a location within Hermosa Beach for an off-leash dog park and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission’s recommendation to further explore potential locations at Valley Park (East) and within a portion of the Greenbelt, and to consider the potential for a future ballot measure to amend Ordinance No. 89-1001. Executive Summary: At its March 11, 2025, City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to evaluate the feasibility of establishing an off-leash dog park in Hermosa Beach in response to a proposal from the community organization Bark for a Park. Staff conducted best -practice research, reviewed comparable facilities in neighboring cities, and evaluated multiple potential locations citywide. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (Commission) recommended advancing consideration of Valley Park (East) and a portion of the Greenbelt as preferred locations, while also suggesting exploration of a future ballot measure to amend Ordinance No. 89-1001 if the Greenbelt is pursued. Background: A feasibility study is a pre-project assessment to better determine the viability, practicality, and potential of a proposed idea or project. Typically conducted before significant investment, the report considers technical, financial, legal, and operational factors that could be used in identifying a prospective location for a dog park in Hermosa Beach. In the City’s most recent Parks Master Plan, adopted in November 2024, one of the goals outlined to advance was to explore current recreational spaces and the feasibility to provide dog-friendly amenities, while considering the associated increases in operations and maintenance costs and neighborhood impacts. At the March 11, 2025, City Council meeting, during public comment, the community organization Bark for a Park requested that the City consider designating a dog park in Hermosa Beach. City Council then recommended a future agenda item directing staff to develop a feasibility study report regarding an off-leash dog park in Hermosa Beach in Page 750 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 10 collaboration with Bark for a Park. City Council also directed staff to present the report to the Commission prior to City Council review. At the July 1, 2025, Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, Bark for a Park provided a presentation (Attachment 1) outlining its case for an off-leash dog park in Hermosa Beach, including potential benefits, possible locations, design elements, and estimated costs and funding ideas. Vice-Chairperson Horowitz, with support from Commissioners Moroney and Worner, requested that staff return with a future agenda item to consider the formation of a subcommittee to evaluate the off-leash dog park proposal. At the September 2, 2025, Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, staff recommended the Commission consider the creation of a Community Dog Park Subcommittee (subcommittee). The Commission serves in an advisory role for the City Council in matters pertaining to the Parks and Recreation Department. Subcommittees are created to assist staff in the completion of Department projects. The Commission unanimously approved the creation of the subcommittee, appointing Chair Ellman and Commissioner Worner. At the March 03, 2026, Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed staff’s findings and provided feedback. The Commission recommended that City Council advance consideration of a dog park feasibility study, including the evaluation of potential locations for an off-leash dog area within Hermosa Beach, with the Commission’s preference to further explore a location in Valley Park (East) and within a portion of the Greenbelt. Additionally, the Commission recommended that the City explore the potential for placing a measure on a future Novembe r ballot to consider amending Ordinance No. 89-1001 to allow limited construction of new facilities and off-leash dogs within a designated section of the Greenbelt. Past Commission and Council Actions Meeting Date Description City Council: March 11, 2025 City Council directed staff to prepare a feasibility report regarding the off-leash dog park proposal submitted by the community organization, Bark for a Park, and to provide such report to the Commission prior to City Council review. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: July 1, 2025 Vice Chairperson Horowitz, with support from Commissioners Moroney and Worner, requested staff return with a future agenda item to consider the formation of a subcommittee to consider the feasibility of an off-leash dog park. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: September 2, 2025 Commission approved the creation of the Community Dog Park subcommittee consisting of Chair Ellman and Commissioner Worner. Page 751 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 10 Meeting Date Description Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: March 03, 2026 Commission recommended advancing the review of the feasibility for an off-leash dog park to City Council with the Commission’s preference to further explore a location in Valley Park (East) and the portion of Greenbelt and the City explore the possibility of placing a public ballot measure to consider amending Ordinance No. 89-1001. Discussion: The Parks and Recreation Department is to serve as the steward of parks, open spaces, and natural resource lands designated for public use and enjoyment , while promoting the preservation and interpretation of historical and cultural resources, the natural environment, and community assets. The subcommittee was tasked with working with staff and collaborating with Bark for a Park to develop a preliminary feasibility report with consideration of: Best-practice research, including collecting information and data from comparable cities with existing dog parks, such as hours of operation, cost estimates for design, construction, equipment, and ongoing maintenance, funding sources, community feedback, and review of policies and procedures; Evaluation of site visits for potential locations (Table 1) within Hermosa Beach; and On-site visits of comparable cities’ dog park facilities (Table 2). Table 1: Potential Off-Leash Dog Park Locations Name of Park Location Approximate Square Ft. Distance to Nearby Residences (From Center) Valley Park East area 12,000 230-265 ft. Valley Park South-East area 10,800 80-90 ft. Bi-Centennial Park Open Green Space 9,900 60-80 ft. Edith Rodaway Park Open Green Space 9,600 98-185 ft. Beach Herondo Street – 1st Street 143,000 70-330 ft. Greenbelt Pier Avenue – 11 th Street 13,800 208-336 ft. The evaluation of potential off-leash dog park locations (Attachment 2) considered various elements that would factor into the designation decision-making, including proximity, impacts to current park use, park features, existing infrastructure, and the landscape. It was determined that one of the proposed locations, Noble Pa rk, does not qualify as it is designated under the OS-2 zoning ordinance, which is reserved for open space and recreational uses that do not allow new structures or facilities that could disrupt the natural or passive character of the area. Page 752 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 10 Maps showcasing the distance to nearby residences from the potential off -leash dog park locations are included as Attachment 3. More information regarding the potential off- leash dog park locations in Hermosa Beach and the onsite walkthrough criteria notes are included as Attachment 4. Table 2: Comparable Cities’ Dog Park Facilities City Park Proximity to Hermosa Beach (City Hall) Approximate Size Distance to nearby residences Manhattan Beach Polliwog Park Dog Run 2.5 miles 5,900 sq ft 406-1,030 ft. Redondo Beach Redondo Beach Dog Park 1.7 miles 130,680 sq ft 236-1,027 ft. El Segundo El Segundo Dog Park 5.5 miles 66,400 sq ft 67-103 ft. The evaluation of comparable Cities’ dog park facilities included the same elements as the Hermosa Beach review, including proximity, impacts to current park use, park features, existing infrastructure, and the landscape. Key takeaways from the comparable sites include: El Segundo and Redondo Beach were in close proximity to residential areas . Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach are incorporated into multi-use parks with sports fields and other amenities. El Segundo and Redondo Beach have dirt surfaces (previously grass) with no additional lighting at the facility, large holes exposed in the ground, leftover personal play equipment on-site, and minimal upkeeping which is dependent on residents or volunteer support to maintain. Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach had limited shade and noticeable odors from dog waste. All three sites lacked nearby restrooms or ADA-accessible paths into the facility, but ample parking was available. Attachments 4 and 5 also include additional information on comparable cities’ unleashed dog parks and the onsite walkthrough criteria notes. Furthermore, Bark for a Park provided additional examples of comparable dog park locations in cities that the subcommittee was unable to visit due to time constraints and distance. Attachment 6 details four Los Angeles sites: Olive Hills, West Hollywood Dog Park, Glen Alla Park, and Bluff Creek, including details on each site’s surface materials, layout designs, aesthetic features and amenities, and signage. Page 753 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 10 Subcommittee Evaluation Following the completion of best-practice research, evaluation, and site visits of potential locations within Hermosa Beach, and on-site visits to comparable cities’ off-leash dog park facilities, the subcommittee developed the following list of potential sites proposed by Bark for the Park where an off-leash dog park could be determined based on feasibility, layout, and the amenities criteria. Location 1 – Valley Park East: Benefits include: Natural shading Nearby pathways, open green space Nearby restrooms, parking lot, and street parking spaces Existing irrigation, lighting, and drainage infrastructure Would occupy a passive section of the open green space Notable challenges include: Uneven surface, steeper grade slopes, Environmental impacts surfacing deterioration (exposed larger surfaced tree roots, nearby garden) Potential impacts to nearby residential area and noise complaints Conflicts with city programming areas and close proximity to the playground ADA concerns o In a preliminary review conducted by Public Works and the ADA consultant, if a dog park is to be installed at Valley Park, the City is required to create an accessible path from ADA parking spaces that are dedicated to the park and from the public sidewalk to the dog park, bathroom, and water fountain, requiring reconstruction of the concrete path we have at the park. o California Building Code requires sidewalks and outdoor paths to be 48" minimum in width. Location 2 - Greenbelt: Benefits include: Central location in Hermosa Beach and near the civic center Minimal impact on homes/residences Flat surface, natural environment, and shading Nearby public restrooms and public parking lot/spaces More easily supports ADA requirements (further evaluation would be required) Potential to incorporate two sections, for small and big dog separation High foot traffic for residents with dogs, which could potentially support local businesses on upper Pier Avenue Notable challenges include: No lighting (hours would need to be assigned dusk to dawn) No direct route per se Page 754 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 6 of 10 Potential environmental impacts and surfacing deterioration New piping installation and infrastructure updates for potable water OS-1 Zone*, which is designated for open space and passive recreational uses, typically limiting construction of new structures or facilities that could disrupt the natural or passive character of the area. *On June 7, 1988, City voters approved local ballot measure Proposition D, authorizing the City to set aside funds to purchase the Santa Fe Railroad right -of-way for conversion to open space and recreational use. On November 7, 1989, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 89-1001, which renamed the purchased property as the Greenbelt , preserved it for parkland and open space purposes, and mandated that all dogs be on a leash within the Greenbelt. Section 6 of the Ordinance states that no provision may be amended without a vote of the people. As a result, any amendment to allow an off -leash dog park in the Greenbelt would require a public electoral vote (ballot measure) and a majority Yes vote for approval. Any ordinance revision would only apply to a small section of the Greenbelt, designated specifically for a dog park, and it would not be recommended to amend the ordinance in its entirety. Location 3 – Edith Rodaway Friendship Park: Benefits include: Flat surface with some natural shading Open green space with limited conflicting park amenities Nearby, street parking spaces, although limited Existing potable water, irrigation, waste station, and fencing infrastructure Current destination for local residents with dogs Notable challenges include: Compacted residential area and potential noise complaints No direct route per se, restrooms, or lighting (hours would be dusk to dawn) Would occupy a large section of the open green space Potential impact on the annual Pumpkins in the Park special event and other city programming Would likely require ADA improvements to the park Location 4 – Bi-Centennial Park: Benefits include: Flat surface with natural shading Direct routes, options for accessibility improvements, and open green space with no conflicting park amenities Existing potable water, irrigation, lighting, drainage, waste stations, and fencing infrastructure Current destination for local residents with dogs Page 755 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 7 of 10 Notable challenges include: Dense residential area, shared fencing to houses, and potential noise complaints No restrooms Would likely require ADA improvements to the park Very limited street parking available Would occupy a large section of the open green space Location 5 – The Beach: Benefits include: Relatively flat, less utilized open space in the area Option for limited use hours and open access zones (no fencing required) Nearby restrooms Minimal impactful to nearby residences Notable challenges include: Approval required from the California Coastal Commission Minimal impactful to nearby residences except Herondo St. condominium Limited parking available Accessibility challenges: not ADA-compliant, and no potable water, irrigation, lighting, drainage, or fencing infrastructure onsite Environmental study required to assess potential impacts and dog waste Sanitation, health, and maintenance concerns due to the sand surface On January 21, 2026, staff, a member of the subcommittee, and Bark for a Park met onsite at Valley Park and the Greenbelt with a Principal Designer from Gaudet Design Group Inc. for an informal discussion of the prospective locations. Below is a summary from the meeting: Valley Park (East): The designer expressed concerns with the slope of the surface and ADA access for the area. Accessible pathways (walkways) must have a maximum running slope (path of travel) of 1:20 (5 percent) and a cross slope not exceeding 1:48 (2 percent). Any path with a slope steeper than 5 percent is considered a ramp. This could require significant grading, including flattening and surface removal of the hillside (entrance) and ADA updates to all pathways in Valley Park leading into the area. These observations are preliminary, and a comprehensive ADA evaluation would be required to make a final determination. Greenbelt (section): The designer expressed confidence that this area would be feasible for a dog park or dog run and identified it as the pref erred location among the two sites considered. Bark for a Park Requests and Financial Support On February 11, 2026, Bark for a Park submitted its requests for preferred locations in Hermosa Beach for an off-leash dog park, which included the section of the Greenbelt as Page 756 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 8 of 10 its primary choice and Bi-Centennial Park as a secondary option if a ballot measure for the Greenbelt does not receive public approval. On April 2nd, 2026, Bark for a Park informed staff (Attachment 7) that they would like to remove the Greenbelt option as their preferred location citing concerns for Council and resident support, as well as financial costs associated with processing a Citizen - Sponsored Initiative. Furthermore, on April 2, 2026, Bark for the Park inquired with staff regarding the feasibility of a location at South Park, northeast behind the restroom facility. This space was beautified in recent years through Proposition 68 funding, including a required 20-year agreement. The City also received funding reimbursements through West Basin Municipal Water District through it turf removal program. Any potential changes to that area would have to be submitted to the State for any potential consideration if they would allow modifications and if so, if it would likely require a return of grant funds. Bark for a Park has verbally agreed to assume financial responsibility for all pre - development costs, including (but not limited to) architectural design, construction, supplies and equipment, required permits, and inspections, to be further determined if a specific location is selected. Bark for a Park has requested that, upon completion of construction, the City assume full responsibility for the dog park and ongoing maintenance. Estimated elements of ongoing maintenance could include but is not limited to: Opening and closing the facility daily Daily and weekly cleaning Removing personal belongings Emptying waste stations and resupplying waste bag stations Replacing or cleaning signage displaying rules and regulations Filling surfacing issues and repairing fencing, seating, or other amenities Irrigation and maintenance of surfaces, vegetation, and substrates Options for Council Consideration: City Council consideration of the following options: 1. Provide direction to staff to proceed with the preparation of a comprehensive feasibility report for a specific location, including one of the locations recommended by the Commission, Valley Park (East) or a portion of the Greenbelt, or another location identified in this report. 2. Provide direction to staff to evaluate multiple locations, including one or both of the Commission-recommended locations and/or alternative locations proposed by the Bark for the Park, and return with a comprehensive feasibility analysis comparing each site. Page 757 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 9 of 10 3. Provide direction to staff to evaluate an alternative location not identified in this report, as determined by City Council, and return with a comprehensive feasibility report. 4. Determine that no location is feasible at this time and direct staff to discontinue further evaluation of an off-leash dog park within Hermosa Beach. Next Steps: Should City Council direct staff to proceed with further evaluation, a comprehensive feasibility report would be required and presented at a future City Council mee ting. Staff from the Parks and Recreation Department and members of the Public Works Department met onsite at Valley Park and the Greenbelt on January 21, 2026, for an assessment of the prospective locations to discuss matters related to maintenance and operational needs, and determined a comprehensive study would be needed. Such report would include, but not be limited to, Public Works Department oversight regarding maintenance and operational needs; applicable permitting requirements at the local and county levels; engagement of a design consultant for site planning and infrastructure; community outreach, including a survey of residents in proximity to the proposed location(s); and preparation of a full-scope capital and ongoing operations budget analysis. .Additionally, the City would likely need to engage a qualified design consultant to prepare conceptual site plans, evaluate site constraints (including grading, drainage, and ADA accessibility), and develop cost estimates, as such technical analysis and design work is beyond the scope of in-house staff resources and would be necessary to ensure accurate feasibility determinations and project implementation requirements. If City Council decides no location is feasible in Hermosa Beach, staff would retire the subcommittee at a future Commission meeting. Fiscal Impact: Implementing an off-leash dog park in Hermosa Beach would have both initial capital costs and ongoing operational and maintenance costs including staff time. Costs would vary depending on the selected location, size, and amenities included. Attachments: 1. Bark for a Park Presentation 2. Proposed Off-Leash Dog Park Locations in Hermosa Beach 3. Proximity of Nearby Residences to Proposed Locations 4. Dog Park Onsite Visits Checklist 5. Comparable Cities’ Dog Park Facilities Visited 6. Other Comparable Cities’ Dog Park Facilities Not Visited 7. Bark for a Park Recommendation Letter Page 758 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 10 of 10 Respectfully Submitted by: Brian Sousa, Senior Recreation Supervisor Concur: Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 759 of 1002 1 Dog Park Proposal for Hermosa Beach March 2025 All information in this report is non-proprietary. Page 760 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 2 Proposal for Establishing a Dog Park in Hermosa Beach We are a passionate group of dog owners advocating for a dog park in Hermosa Beach. With over 3,000 dogs in the city—twice the number of local students and six times the youth that play in HB Little League each year —our community clearly values its four-legged companions. i Yet, Hermosa Beach lacks a designated space where dogs can play and run off-leash. Right now, residents must drive to neighboring dog parks in Redondo Beach or Manhattan Beach to exercise their dogs or let their dogs off-leash when no one is looking. As the number of homes with dogs continues to grow, so does the need for pet-friendly facilities. This demand is reflected in the city's recently adopted Parks Master Plan, where a dog park was identified as a top priority by residents. Additionally, a dog park aligns with the city’s long-term vision of a healthy and vibrant community outlined in Plan Hermosa. Public support for a dog park is growing. Our advocacy group, Bark for a Park, launched a survey in January 2025 to gauge interest in a dog park within our city. We have collected over 820 signatures and the numbers continue to grow. This report highlights the benefits of a dedicated dog park, explores potential locations, provides an estimate of costs and potential funding strategies. What is a Dog Park? A dog park is a public or private park for dogs to play off-leash in a controlled environment to exercise and socialize under the supervision of their owners. Throughout this report, we will refer to this request as a dog park. There is no standard designation between a dog park and a dog run, or even a dog area. While experts say a dog park should ideally be one to five acres, in many urban areas like Chicago, New York, or San Francisco, dog parks are as small as 5,000 square feet. ii Page 761 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 3 Benefits of a Dog Park A dog park within walking distance of most homes in the city supports the 2017 Plan Hermosa by providing a unique space that supports a low-carbon, healthy, and active community. iii In a city where most residents have no yard or a small yard, a dog park can provide an outdoor recreational space for pets. A dog park is also one of the key priorities identified in the recently adopted Parks Master Plan. • Community Benefits: A dog park will serve as a central hub for social interaction among residents, creating stronger community ties and fostering friendships. Additionally, it encourages outdoor activities, promoting healthier lifestyles for both residents and their pets. • Pet-Specific Benefits: The park will provide a safe, fenced environment where dogs can play off-leash without endangering themselves or others. Socialization opportunities with other dogs and humans will help improve canine behavior and reduce anxiety or aggression. • Environmental and Citywide Benefits: A dog park will reduce pet waste in other public spaces. It will also cut down on the number of citations issued for off-leash violations. Finally, dog parks can increase property values in a city. According to the National Association of Realtors dog parks are a desirable amenity for buyers who have pets, especially in urban areas with small yards. Page 762 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 4 Proposed Locations Based on a review of Hermosa’s parks and continual input from constituents, we have identified nine potential locations for a dog park that are all between 3,400 and 11,600 square feet. Of these, we believe 3 have the highest potential based on size, parking, impact on nearby neighbors and other factors. Any locations (except the beach) would have (1) double-door entry systems for secure access, (2) six-foot high fencing, (3) a dog water source, (4) waste receptacles, (5) buffer zones (hedges or trees) to minimize noise and disruptions to neighbors, (6) dog-friendly substrates, (7) eco-friendly landscaping and drainage systems, (8) ADA Accessibility and (9) clear signage that establishes rules, norms for community behavior, release of liability and directions to report issues / suggestions. See Appendix 1.0 – Dog Park Features & Appendix 2.0 – Possible Dog Park Rules & Signage for more detail. Page 763 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 5 VALLEY PARK SOUTHEAST City owned portion of Valley Park along the southeast corner by the Kiwanis & Rotary Clubs. 10,000 square feet. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for many residents Good Parking Relatively under-utilized part of the park ? Impacts 5-6 homes VALLEY PARK EAST City owned portion of Valley Park along the east side just south of the restrooms and below Valley drive. 11,600 square feet. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for many residents Good Parking & Shade Relatively under utilized Impacts no homes Already utilized by many dog owners Page 764 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 6 VALLEY PARK WEST City owned portion of Valley Park along the Northwest corner of Gould and Morningside. 11,200 square feet. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for many residents Good Parking & Shade Relatively under utilized ? Impacts 5 homes ? School children walk by NOBLE PARK EAST City owned portion of Noble Park along the eastern edge. 8,000 square feet. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for many residents Undulating landscape is fun for dogs Existing benches / shade Relatively under utilized ? Parking tight on weekends / summer ? Impacts 2 homes & La Playita ? Small drainage issue Page 765 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 7 COMMUNITY CENTER EAST LAWN Portion of east lawn of city owned Community Center. Around 7,000 square feet depending on configuration. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for many Relatively under utilized Would bring foot traffic to upper pier No neighbors impacted Good parking ? Impacts Kiwanis Christmas tree sale WATER TOWER – 16TH & PROSPECT Unused portion of land owned by California Water Service that city officials have received indications could be used as a park. Portion on west side is around 3,400 square feet. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for East side residents Shaded ? Parking tight ? Small ? Impacts many homes Page 766 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 8 EDITH RODAWAY PARK SOUTH South portion of City owned Edith Rodaway Park that has fencing on three sides. Would preserve access to grassy area from basketball courts. About 6,500 square feet. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for East side residents Already has a dog water station ? Parking tight ? Impacts 8-9 homes BI-CENTENNIAL PARK Portion of city owned Bi-Centennial Park that would still allow access from neighbors on 3rd street to the south. Around 6,400 square feet depending on configuration. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for residents living south Lots of shade Relatively under utilized No neighbors to the east and west ? Parking tight ? Impacts 4 homes on the south & 4-5 across the street. Page 767 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 9 BEACH DOG PARK One of the locations that comes up over and over is the idea of putting a dog park somewhere on the beach in Hermosa. Reactions to this are strong – either for or against with those against mentioning the issues of: 1. Possible health issues of dogs on the beach (e.g. Dog waste). 2. Negative interactions between dogs and patrons of the beach. Several locations in Southern California have worked around these issues – Long Beach, Huntington Beach, Del Mar and San Diego. We are actively talking with these cities to understand how they have set up their parks and managed these issues and worked with the Coastal Commission. In discussions with Long Beach, they utilize beach clean-up vehicles several times a week, have had no health complaints and no increase in water toxicity beyond what all beaches have after heavy rains. They have reported no negative interactions between dogs or between dogs and humans and are so satisfied with their beach that they are working to add a second location The Coastal Commission has been supportive. The City of Del Mar has similar success (Details of discussions available upon request.) Some ideas that have been suggested for a beach dog park in Hermosa are: 1. Locating a dog beach in the southernmost part of Hermosa with clear markers on where / when dogs are allowed. 2. Only allowing dogs in the off-season. 3. Limiting hours (e.g. 6-8am Tu-Th). Page 768 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 10 Estimated Building Costs For a 10,000 square foot Dog Park, construction costs would be $72,000 to $235,000 depending on fencing, substrate, and amenities (See Appendix 3.0 - Estimated Costs to Build a Dog Park for more details). Depending on year 1 funding, the city could begin with a more basic design (e.g. grass substrate) and augment over time (e.g. add anti-microbial artificial turf and additional amenities). Funding Sources We believe funding sources for building a quality dog park range from initial Year 1 funding of $160,000-220,000. YEAR 1 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES SOURCE DETAILS ESTIMATE City Sources • Unclear what city might have within its budget. $50k Licenses • Redirect revenue from annual dog licenses to creation and maintenance of dog park. • Have dog licensing requirements for park entry • Increase yearly fees by $5-10/year.iv ~ $5k/yr if increase license fee & register 250 new dogs Public Contributions / Partner with Community Organization • Many dog parks are funded (at least partially) by local neighborhood groups. • A group could be created, under the Friends of the Parks (for tax purposes) to help fundraise. • Individuals could sponsor benches, signage, water fountains, leash holders, trees, shade awnings, bulletin boards. • Group could raise funds through raffles / events. $90k-$150k Founding Corporate Sponsorships • Would need same exemption as Little League to city rule of allowing corporate advertising on city property. • Create Founding Sponsorships. In exchange for signage opportunities, having events at the park and being promoted through social media, local businesses and pet related businesses (e.g. groomers, vets, pet products, trainers, walkers).v • Possible grants $15k ($500 – 30 businesses) Page 769 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 11 Park Maintenance & Programming In a UC Davis Veterinary School study on dog parks in urban areas vi the quality of maintenance was one of the biggest factors correlating to ranking of off-leash dog park success. Elements of maintenance include: - Emptying waste cans & Re-supplying waste pick up bags - Opening and closing the park - Replacing/fixing signs displaying rules - Filling holes dug by dogs & repairing fencing - Irrigation and maintenance of vegetation and substrate Work is needed to estimate these costs (we have reached out to Public Works in Hermosa and are currently reaching out to Manhattan Beach Public Works). Some additional logistics ideas have been to close the park: • ½ day a week for deep cleaning / minor maintenance. • 1-2 weeks each year for larger maintenance / enhancements. In addition, programming could be done (either by the city or in tandem with a volunteer “Friends of the Dog Park” group) to educate local dog owners (e.g. vaccination clinics, dog training sessions, fun events). These could also have fundraising potential. Funding for yearly maintenance of the park and ongoing enhancements could include: ONGOING FUNDING SOURCES FOR MAINTENANCE & ENHANCEMENTS SOURCE DETAILS ESTIMATE HB Budget $5k Licenses • Redirect revenue from annual dog licenses to creation and maintenance of dog park. • Have dog licensing requirements for park entry • Increase yearly fees by $5-10/year to generate revenue (same as year 1 funding) ~ $5k/yr if increase license fee & register 250 new dogs Yearly raffle • Raffle for maintenance / enhancements funds. $10-$20k/yr Yearly Corporate Sponsorships • Yearly corporate sponsors donate in exchange for promotion of their businesses. • Dedicated social media for the park could promote deals from sponsors. • Periodic events in the parks (e.g. mobile groomer, teeth cleaner, vaccination clinic, trainers). • Host dog charities for owners to donate used pet items. $5k ($250 – 20 businesses) TOTAL $25-$35 k Page 770 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 12 Addressing Concerns Several concerns have been brought up with regards to a dog park. Below are some ideas for mitigating these worries. Area Strategies NOISE Create barriers between the park and neighbors that include special fence coverings such as Acoustifence vii which reduces sound by 85% and landscaping to dull sound and create a nice aesthetic. Post signs asking owners to remove their dog from the park if they are excessively barking. SAFETY Study on dog parks by UC Davis Veterinary Behavioral Medicine Center for Animalsviii found that injuries to people and dogs in legal off-leash areas are rare. Signage indicating that dogs that are aggressive to other dogs, young dogs (less than 4 months) and suggestions for fearful dogs have been proven to be effective in deterring interactions. Additionally, all park users should have their dogs under voice control and children should be closely supervised by a responsible adult. As with any public space that dogs frequent (e.g. the Strand) the best way to keep a dog safe is to ensure they are up to date with all vaccinations. Programming (supported by a community group) that educates patrons on dog behavior and offering periodic vaccination events can also benefit the community. SANITATION Fecal counts have been identified as the third most profiled concern of community officials and park managers regarding dog parks according to the UC Davis report. A correlation was found between the number of signs in the park reminding users to pickup after their dogs and a lower fecal count. Signs seem to be more important than the number of trash cans provided the cans are not overflowing (See Appendix 2.0 - Possible Dog Park Rules & Signage for signage examples). Peer pressure and “self-policing” have been identified by park managers as factors that improve compliance. Page 771 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 13 Bark for a Park Advocacy Group In submitting this report, we acknowledge past efforts in Hermosa to create a dog park. This effort, Bark for a Park, was born out of lot in Hermosa that dog owners were allowed free access during COVID for off-leash recreation. The joy of the dogs and the community created there evolved into a once a week off-leash dog park on a walk street in 2022. Yet the desire by participants was and is to not just have a place to meet once a week for an hour but to have a quality off-leash area in Hermosa where all dogs and owners in Hermosa can meet and strengthen the community. This is the genesis of this Bark for a Park effort. Since the Bark for a Park launch (see www.hermosabeachdogpark.com) we have found and connected to other lovely groups and individuals in Hermosa who also want a special community place where dogs can connect. One of the group, Carla Buck, has: • Attended Hermosa Beach Parks Master Plan study sessions. • Spoken at City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission meetings to advocate for a dog park. • Conducted ongoing research on building and maintaining dog parks including: o Reviewing dog park proposals & fundraising mechanisms, studies on noise, safety, liability, safety and signage. o Attending seminars and reading manuals on building dog parks. o Visiting dog parks across Southern California o Soliciting quotes from fencing and artificial turf companies to provide realistic estimates for our proposal. As of 3/10/25, we have over 820 signatures in support of a dog park, many of which are offering to actively and passionately work to make a quality off-leash dog park in Hermosa a reality. Conclusion The establishment of a dog park in Hermosa Beach will benefit residents, enhance the city’s amenities, and contribute to the overall well-being of dogs and their owners. This project aligns with Plan Hermosa, the Parks Master Plan, and the city’s commitment to creating recreational spaces all to enjoy. As dog owners, we are committed to fostering a vibrant, inclusive, and pet friendly community. We urge the council to consider our proposal and look forward to discussing it further. We sincerely hope that the council will move quickly to make this a reality. Page 772 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 14 Respectfully submitted. Sources i Estimated 40% of U.S. households have at least 1 dog according to a 2024 study by The Zebra (Zebra, Pet Ownership Statistics, 2024). Hermosa Beach has 8,922 households according to U.S. Census Bureau (Bureau, 2023) so at least 3,000 dogs assuming 40% have 1 dog. There were 1,325 students K-8 in Hermosa Schools for the 2023-24 year (Statistics, 2023). In 2024, there were an estimated 18,300 residents of Hermosa Beach. (Review, n.d.) ii There is no standard designation between a dog park or a dog run or even a dog area and even though “experts” say a dog park ideally is 1-5 acres, in many urban areas such as Chicago (Chicago, 2020), NYC (refers to most parks even large ones as dog runs) or San Francisco (Parks S. F., n.d.), dog parks can be as small as 5000 square feet. iii PLAN Hermosa Integrated General Plan and Coastal Land Use Plan. (2017). chrome- extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.hermosabeach.gov/home/showpublishe ddocument/9872/637001018228830000 iv As of 2024 yearly license for a pet in Hermosa costs $29 for a neutered dog and $109 for a non- neutered one. Many owners either do not know they need one or don’t get one because of lack of perceived value to them. Making a license a requirement to enter the dog park and having periodic sign-up events could increase the percentage of owners who get a license – creating additional revenue. Cost of license could increase by $5-10/year and be directly allocated to cost of maintaining and enhancing the park. v Sponsorship Examples – Madison Parks Foundation (Foundation, n.d.), City of LA Parks & Recreation (Parks C. o., n.d.), Redondo Beach Dog Park (Park, n.d.), Lansing Michigan (District, n.d.), City of Plainwell Michigan (City of Plainwell, n.d.) vi UC Davis dog park study - chrome- extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://thestantonfoundation.org/assets/canine/Dog- Park-Resources/UC-Davis-Study-Dog-Park-Maintenance.pdf vii Acoutifence is an example of a product used to reduce noise generated by dog parks. https://acoustiblok.com/portfolio-items/animal-noise/ viii UC Davis dog park study - chrome- extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://thestantonfoundation.org/assets/canine/Dog- Park-Resources/UC-Davis-Study-Dog-Park-Maintenance.pdf Page 773 of 1002 2025 Hermosa Beach Dog Park Proposal - Appendix 1 Dog Park Proposal for Hermosa Beach APPENDIX – MARCH 2025 Page 774 of 1002 2025 Hermosa Beach Dog Park Proposal - Appendix 2 Appendix 1.0 - Dog Park Features Size – Although “experts” say the best dog areas are 1+ acres, in urban environments (e.g. Chicago, NYC, SF) many dog parks are much smaller and still provide most of same advantages to their bigger cousins. Barrier - 6’ high fence so dogs can’t wiggle through or jump over (chain link if close to the water; steel if farther away from the beach). Double-gate system to prevent dogs from escaping when other dogs and people enter or leave the space. At least one dog water source. Waste removal supplies and equipment, such as baggies, shovels or scoopers and covered trash containers. There is no hard & fast rule for number of waste receptacles in a dog park, but there should be at least one at the entrance and 1-2 more depending on the size of the park. The key is creating a dog park culture where all respect the space and clean up after their dog (by the way – most people obey rules when someone is watching.) Good signage that outlines rules & liabilities (see Appendix 3.0 for list of potential rules). In California, cities are not liable for incidents unless there was an out of the ordinary hazard in the park (something that applies to all of our parks.) Signs should indicate “use at your own risk” and refer to 3342 California Civil Code that states the owner of any dog is liable for damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place. Page 775 of 1002 2025 Hermosa Beach Dog Park Proposal - Appendix 3 Safe Substrate (i.e.. Surface) Consider surfaces that are easy to maintain and not harmful to dogs. Gold standard is anti-microbial artificial turf. Turf • Dogs love it • Must be watered, mowed, weeded and periodically replaced • Worn patches should be repaired timely • Feces may be hard to detect Anti-microbial artificial turf • Dogs love it • Most expensive option • Must periodically be washed and deep- cleaned (2-4/month) • Good for ~5-8 years depending on wear Bark / Wood Chips • Relatively cheap option • Easily maintained • Not aesthetically pleasing to some • Feces can be stuck on chips • Non ADA- compliant • Periodic replenishment • Should pick product so that dogs do not get splinters Decomposed Granite (DG) • Relatively easy to maintain • Can be dirty and hot for dogs • Feces easily detected and removed • Must be repaired when dogs dig holes • Good drainage if deep enough and graded well Sand • No worry about holes • Adequate drainage • Feces easily detected and removed. • Could be too hot for dogs during warm weather • Maintaining and keeping clean may require special equipment Dirt • Higher complaints of safety • Participants complain dogs must be washed each visit. • Muddy after rain • Little maintenance Good drainage to help prevent muddy conditions. Wheelchair and ADA accessible Convenient hours that respect neighbors - Typically dawn to dusk – e.g. 6-7am-7pm. Could have 1 morning/day a week closed for maintenance (e.g. Redondo Beach Dog Park does this) and 1 week a year for enhancements / major maintenance. Hermosa Specific – Walkable and if people drive it is easy to park. Minimal impact to neighbors OR park impacts minimal neighbors. Page 776 of 1002 2025 Hermosa Beach Dog Park Proposal - Appendix 4 Sturdy, pet-friendly seating . Shaded areas, such as from trees, umbrellas or open gazebos. Protection of Plants – To preserve the health of trees and shrubbery, some parks put barriers around them. Small/Large dog areas – This is preferred but not required depending on the space. Some cites only have one area but having a small dog area gives smaller dogs a space to not be intimidated. Announcement Board. Could use the park to educate and inform residents about vaccinations and upcoming clinics, dog licenses, upcoming events & services. Noise reduction strategies – Eco-friendly shrubbery and/or Sound reduction fence covering can reduce sound by as much as 85% Page 777 of 1002 2025 Hermosa Beach Dog Park Proposal - Appendix 5 Appendix 2.0 - Possible Dog Park Rules & Signage Below is a set of rules compiled from 30-40 different parks. There are too many below to list but should give a sense of the types of rules laid out by different communities. WELCOME TO YOUR DOG PARK! This area is dedicated to fun and exercise activities with your dog. Dogs may run off-leash, under voice control, within the confines of the fenced area. Be responsible & Enjoy the Dog Park! HOURS OF OPERATION 7am to 8pm – DAILY (change during summer?) • Some parks closed a morning or day a week for maintenance and 1 week a year for larger enhancements. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLEAN-UP • Dog waste must be cleaned up by their owners IMMEDIATELY [See clever signs] OTHER BEHAVIOR • Keep your dog on a leash until you enter the park area. • Handlers must be within the dog park and supervising their dog with leash readily available. • 3 dog maximum per visitor [NOTE: UC Davis study indicated that too many dogs per person resulted in more un-picked up feces]. • Please keep your dog from jumping on other dogs or people • Aggressive dogs must be removed immediately (Do not allow your dogs to be aggressive towards people or other dogs) • Dogs should be under voice control • Do not allow dogs to dig holes. If they do, fill holes immediately • Keep your dog away from gates when other dogs are entering • The dog park gate must be closed at all times. LIABILITY NOTE: Cities limit liability for dog parks by posting signs that communicate to owners that they use the park at their own risk. California Civil Code 3342 says that the owner of any dog is liable for the damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place. The only liability for a city is if there is out-of-the- ordinary hazard left unrepaired in the park which applies not just to a dog park but to any park within the city. • Use park at your own risk. (Park is not responsible for injury or damage; enjoy at your own risk) Page 778 of 1002 2025 Hermosa Beach Dog Park Proposal - Appendix 6 • Owners are legally responsible for behavior of their dog(s) at all times SAFETY • All dogs must have current vaccinations / wearing a collar with ID tags • No Dogs under 4 months. • All dogs above a certain age (e.g. 2 years) must be spayed / neutered. RESTRICTION OF USE • Some parks are only open to residents of that city OR they must buy a usage pass. HANDLER / VISITOR AGE • Dog handlers must be at least 16 years of age. • Children under 13 must be accompanied by an adult and supervised at all times. PROHIBITED • Human & dog food/treats • Glass containers • Dogs in heat • Sick dogs • Aggressive dogs • Puppies (under 4 months) • Strollers, bikes, skateboards, and similar items • Pets other than dogs WHO TO CALL • In an emergency, Please call 911. • Report incidents, problems or violations to xx at xxx-xxx-xxxx • Violation of rules may be cited by xxx of the HB Municipal Code • Suggestions? • Refer to Social Media for the Park. Failure to comply with Dog Park Rules may result in you and your dog(s) being asked to leave the facility. Page 779 of 1002 2025 Hermosa Beach Dog Park Proposal - Appendix 7 Some parks use humor / graphics to inform and create norms of behavior. IDEA: We could engage local artists to create signs / images for us. OR – Set the tone of the park • “Be the person your dog thinks you are” • “Friendly dogs only” / “Well behaved dogs are welcome” OR Educate Page 780 of 1002 2025 Hermosa Beach Dog Park Proposal - Appendix 8 Appendix 3.0 - Estimated Costs to Build a Dog Park Based on a 10,000 square foot dog park (the largest of identified locations) we estimate a dog park could be built between ~$72,000 to $235,000. • Based on funding, some of these items (e.g. artificial turf, agility equipment) could be phased in overtime. • Does not include maintenance costs. Item cost TOTAL COST 72,002$ 131,222$ 233,102$ Approximate SF - 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 6 ft Fence / Double Gates [Material & Install] (1) 30,200$ Chain Link 33,500$ Steel 33,500$ Steel Surface [Material & Install] (2)10,000$ No change 50,000$ Engineered Wood Chips 125,000$ Antimicrobial Artificial Turf Accessories (1) Benches 350$ 350$ 1 700$ 2 1,050$ 3 Water Fountain 3,500$ 1 3,500$ 1 7,500$ Waste bin(s)600$ 600$ 1 1,200$ 2 1,800$ 3 Waste bag dispenser(s)550$ 1,100$ 2 1,100$ 2 1,650$ 3 Signage 1,000$ 1,000$ 1 2,000$ 2 2,000$ 2 Bulletin Board 1,000$ -$ - -$ - 1,000$ 1 Leash hooks 500$ -$ - 500$ 1 500$ 1 Agility equipment (3)-$ 3,000$ 6,000$ Initial Waste Bags 84$ 252$ 3 252$ 3 252$ 3 Plaques 200$ 1,000$ 5 1,600$ 8 2,000$ 10 Engineering / Install - Plan Design (3)6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ - Installation (plumbing, equipment) (3) 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ Contingency (20%)12,000$ 21,870$ 38,850$ (1) Detail on quotes available upon request (2) Design of park surface may include multiple surfaces (e.g. packed DG on some portion, grass of turf on another) (3) Estimate. Not backed up by a quote Basic Mid High Page 781 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 4 Proposed Locations Based on a review of Hermosa’s parks and continual input from constituents, we have identified nine potential locations for a dog park that are all between 3,400 and 11,600 square feet. Of these, we believe 3 have the highest potential based on size, parking, impact on nearby neighbors and other factors. Any locations (except the beach) would have (1) double-door entry systems for secure access, (2) six-foot high fencing, (3) a dog water source, (4) waste receptacles, (5) buffer zones (hedges or trees) to minimize noise and disruptions to neighbors, (6) dog-friendly substrates, (7) eco-friendly landscaping and drainage systems, (8) ADA Accessibility and (9) clear signage that establishes rules, norms for community behavior, release of liability and directions to report issues / suggestions. See Appendix 1.0 – Dog Park Features & Appendix 2.0 – Possible Dog Park Rules & Signage for more detail. Page 782 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 5 VALLEY PARK SOUTHEAST City owned portion of Valley Park along the southeast corner by the Kiwanis & Rotary Clubs. 10,000 square feet. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for many residents Good Parking Relatively under-utilized part of the park ?Impacts 5-6 homes VALLEY PARK EAST City owned portion of Valley Park along the east side just south of the restrooms and below Valley drive. 11,600 square feet. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for many residents Good Parking & Shade Relatively under utilized Impacts no homes Already utilized by many dog owners Page 783 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 6 VALLEY PARK WEST City owned portion of Valley Park along the Northwest corner of Gould and Morningside. 11,200 square feet. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for many residents Good Parking & Shade Relatively under utilized ?Impacts 5 homes ?School children walk by NOBLE PARK EAST City owned portion of Noble Park along the eastern edge. 8,000 square feet. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for many residents Undulating landscape is fun for dogs Existing benches / shade Relatively under utilized ?Parking tight on weekends / summer ?Impacts 2 homes & La Playita ?Small drainage issue Page 784 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 7 COMMUNITY CENTER EAST LAWN Portion of east lawn of city owned Community Center. Around 7,000 square feet depending on configuration. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for many Relatively under utilized Would bring foot traffic to upper pier No neighbors impacted Good parking ?Impacts Kiwanis Christmas tree sale WATER TOWER –16TH & PROSPECT Unused portion of land owned by California Water Service that city officials have received indications could be used as a park. Portion on west side is around 3,400 square feet. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for East side residents Shaded ?Parking tight ?Small ?Impacts many homes Page 785 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 8 EDITH RODAWAY PARK SOUTH South portion of City owned Edith Rodaway Park that has fencing on three sides. Would preserve access to grassy area from basketball courts. About 6,500 square feet. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for East side residents Already has a dog water station ?Parking tight ?Impacts 8-9 homes BI-CENTENNIAL PARK Portion of city owned Bi-Centennial Park that would still allow access from neighbors on 3rd street to the south.Around 6,400 square feet depending on configuration. HIGHLIGHTS Walkable for residents living south Lots of shade Relatively under utilized No neighbors to the east and west ?Parking tight ?Impacts 4 homes on the south & 4-5 across the street. Page 786 of 1002 HERMOSA BEACH DOG PARK PROPOSAL 9 BEACH DOG PARK One of the locations that comes up over and over is the idea of putting a dog park somewhere on the beach in Hermosa. Reactions to this are strong – either for or against with those against mentioning the issues of: 1. Possible health issues of dogs on the beach (e.g. Dog waste). 2.Negative interactions between dogs and patrons of the beach. Several locations in Southern California have worked around these issues – Long Beach, Huntington Beach, Del Mar and San Diego. We are actively talking with these cities to understand how they have set up their parks and managed these issues and worked with the Coastal Commission. In discussions with Long Beach, they utilize beach clean-up vehicles several times a week, have had no health complaints and no increase in water toxicity beyond what all beaches have after heavy rains. They have reported no negative interactions between dogs or between dogs and humans and are so satisfied with their beach that they are working to add a second location The Coastal Commission has been supportive. The City of Del Mar has similar success (Details of discussions available upon request.) Some ideas that have been suggested for a beach dog park in Hermosa are: 1. Locating a dog beach in the southernmost part of Hermosa with clear markers on where / when dogs are allowed. 2. Only allowing dogs in the off-season. 3.Limiting hours (e.g. 6-8am Tu-Th). Page 787 of 1002 Valley Park (East): Page 788 of 1002 Valley Park (Southeast): Page 789 of 1002 Greenbelt: (Section) Page 790 of 1002 Edith Rodaway Friendship Park: Page 791 of 1002 Bi-Centennial Park: Page 792 of 1002 The Beach (Herondo St. – 1st Street) Page 793 of 1002 PROJECT TITLE Bark for a Park Project COMMITTEE / TASKFORCE Parks and Recreation Subcommittee - Ellman & Worner PROJECT STAFF LIASONS Brian Sousa & Nick Shattuck DEPARTMENT Community Resources & Public Works TASK DESCRIPTION VALLEY PARK - EAST VALLEY PARK - SOUTHEAST EDITH RODAWAY BEACH - HERONDO BI-CENTENNIAL PARK *GREENBELT NOTES ADDITIONAL NOTES Adequate available space: •Large Dog Area: ≈ 3 acres or more •Small Dog Area: ≈ 0.75 acres or more Large Area- NO Small Area- Yes Large Area- NO Small Area- NO Large Area- NO Small Area- Yes Large Area- Yes Small Area- Yes Large Area- NO Small Area- Yes Large Area- NO Small Area- Yes (ideally 0.5–1 acre minimum for off-leash) (Note: These are “ideal” standards; many cities implement smaller parks due to site constraints.) Layout: (Slope, Flat, Mix-use, etc) Slope with some flat uneven ground/hill Slight slope, mostly flat Flat Flat Flat Slight slope, mostly flat Valley East- lots of tree roots Beach- Seasonal impacts with storms/tides Proximity to residential area(s): (≥ 150 ft)Yes- Gould Ave No- 25th Street No- Prospect and Gentry No- Herondo apartment/condos , Strand homes No- 4th and 3rd & Ardmore Yes Would require resident survery Bi- Centennial/Edith- noise concerns Greenbelt cleared from residents Proximity to commercial area(s): (≥ 80 ft)None None *Kiwanis + Rotary within None None No- Auto body shop No- Storage center Proximity to Playground: Impacted Areas Picnic Area #2 , Playground, VPSDC play field, Shakespeare BTS Cleared None None None None Civic Center, Community Center, Library Proximity to Programming area:VPSDC Play field VPSDC field, outdoor fitness permit + contract class field, Events, fitness permit + contract class field, Junior Lifeguard program None Fitness stations Edith- nearby play area/basketball courts Beach- does have nearby volleyball courts Is it far enough from playgrounds, picnic areas, sports fields and sensitive habitats? Water Source(s) available nearby restrooms plumbing, irrigation nearby drinking fountain and sinks, irrigation nearby drinking fountain, irrigation None No drinking station, but irrigation onsite No drinking station, but irrigation onsite Current Surface: (grass, dirt, DG, sand, etc.)Grass Grass Grass Sand Grass Grass VP - Mud/Dirt/runoff concerns Any natural shading available Yes, Trees Yes, Trees Yes limited, Trees None Yes, Trees Yes, Trees Available parking Yes, two lots and street Yes, lot and street Limited, free public parking spaces nearby Nearby Redondo lot, parking spaces Limited, few free public parking spaces nearby Yes, lot and street Current Accessibility: (paths, ada, etc) Nearby DG path and cement path Nearby handicap parking and cement path None None - ADA mobi mat would be needed No pathways in the park, but neaby sidwalks Yes, ADA DG path (Note: The off-leash area must be ADA accessible to all users.) Conflicts With Other Park Uses Open space (picnics), natural habitat impacts, nearby activity zone, events Open green space, activity zone for programming Open green space, activity zone for programming, events LA County Beaches & Harbors + Lifeguards None, But Open green space Yes, natural habitat impacts. *Greenbelt OS-1 Restricted Open Space Beach- fencing concerns (Coastal Commission), cleaning/maintenance, M.C. updates required for dogs on the beach •The dog park should not be placed in high- activity zones of a park •The dog park should not displace: oOrganized sports/recreation, oOr key passive open space resources, Restroom facilities nearby: Yes Yes None Within distance- 2nd St.None None, but Within distance- CC, City Hall Lighting available Limited, 2 Light Post 3 small light posts None None 2 light posts Street Lighting Drainage patterns run-off slope zone, 1 visible drain none observed none observed Sand absorbs & nearby Storm Drain 1 visible drain none observed to avoid water accumulation. Potential for installing drainage improvements if needed. Page 794 of 1002 PROJECT TITLE Bark for a Park Project COMMITTEE / TASKFORCE Parks and Recreation Subcommittee - Ellman & Worner PROJECT STAFF LIASONS Brian Sousa & Nick Shattuck DEPARTMENT Community Resources & Public Works TASK DESCRIPTION EL SEGUNDO MANHATTAN BEACH REDONDO BEACH PLAYA VISTA SANTA MONICA NOTES ADDITIONAL NOTES Adequate available space: •Large Dog Area: ≈ 3 acres or more •Small Dog Area: ≈ 0.75 acres or more Large Area- Yes Small Area- Yes Large Area- NO Small Area- Yes Large Area- Yes Small Area- Yes El Seg- Who locks up daily? 4 feet fencing = small dogs, 6 feet fencing = large dogs MB- never locks/closes, fencing 4-5 ft. El Seg- message boards, poop scoopers, trash cans, benches, fencing Layout: (Slope, Flat, Mix-use, etc)Flat with slopes Flat Flat El Seg- large holes in surface (digging), MB- benches, bag stations, chairs/seating, wood fencing to protect trees (urine/damage) Proximity to residential area(s): (≥ 150 ft)No- residence across street Yes No- residence across street El Segundo- Airport noise works as a barrier Proximity to commercial area(s): (≥ 80 ft)None Yes None Airport nearby Proximity to Playground: Impacted Areas None nearby, Less than 100 feet None Proximity to Programming area:None Playground, baseball fields, swimming pool, track, green space Baseball fields, open green space MB- dog leash coat racks, Water Source(s) available Drinking fountains, recycled water irigation Drinking fountains, hose connection for watering drinking fountain, water spikets hose connection Current Surface: (grass, dirt, DG, sand, etc.)Dirt (previously grass)Mulch/wood chips Dirt (previously grass) El Seg- 1x weekly landscaping maintenance MB- wood chips spraying out onto pathway, replacing every Q. MB- Daily maintenance contractor (raking/watering for dust). RB+MB Residents/volunteers upkeep Any natural shading available Yes, Trees limited, one tree limited, couple trees in large open space El Seg- lots of trees and tree roots Available parking Street parking Yes, street and lot Yes, street and lot Current Accessibility: (paths, ada, etc)None None None Conflicts With Other Park Uses None None None El Seg- left over balls/play toys, El Seg- large electrical power lines above Restroom facilities nearby: None Portable restrooms None Lighting available None yes, light posts None Drainage patterns None none observed None RB: strong odor/urine smell Page 795 of 1002 PROJECT TITLE Bark for a Park Project COMMITTEE / TASKFORCE Parks and Recreation Subcommittee - Ellman & Worner PROJECT STAFF LIASONS Brian Sousa & Nick Shattuck DEPARTMENT Community Resources & Public Works TASK DESCRIPTION EL SEGUNDO MANHATTAN BEACH REDONDO BEACH PLAYA VISTA SANTA MONICA NOTES ADDITIONAL NOTES cost estimate for design cost estimate for construction $850,000 $18,200 $45,000 El Segundo- city allocated $850,000 for the construction of Acacia Park, which includes the dedicated dog park area. cost estimate for equipment (ex. fencing, benches, waste & water stations, scoopers)50,000 60,000 MB rennovation 2025 + RB rennovation 2020 $324,000 MB consultant proposal cost estimates for ongoing maintenance/cleaning $0 $84,000 +/- allocated funding amount via city budget (annually)17,412 funding sources via grants (annually) allocated funding via donations/sponsors (annually)HOA Funded Maintenance schedule (# of days/week for upkeeping and cleaning)1x per week landscaping Daily raking, 1x per week cleaning Responsible entity for routine maintenance/cleaning Contractor - landscaping Residents - upkeeping Contractor Contractor - landscaping Residents - upkeeping Organizations/Departments involved in maintaining the facility Public Works, Contractor, Residents Contractor, Public Works, Friends of the Parks, Public Works, Residents Page 796 of 1002 Comparable Cities Manhattan Beach – Polliwog Park Dog Run Page 797 of 1002 Comparable Cities Redondo Beach Dog Park Page 798 of 1002 Comparable Cities El Segundo Dog Park Page 799 of 1002 1. EXAMPLES OF OTHER DOG PARKS BEYOND SOUTH BAY (Not meant to compare parks pros and cons as much as provide input and ideas towards design of a Hermosa park) a)Olive Hills (Anaheim) b)West Hollywood Dog Park c)Glen Alla Park (MDR) d)Bluff Creek (Playa Vista) 2. CITY MAINTENANCE FUNDING IDEA 1 Dog Park Reseach Page 800 of 1002 A) Anaheim – Olive Hills Dog Park 2 BACKGROUND •1.2 acres (52,000sf) within bigger park •Opened August 2016. Separated small and large dog use areas with agility equipment, benches, and native plant materials •No neighbors •Dawn to Dusk •6 ft high black metal fencing Page 801 of 1002 3 WHY INTERESTING? •Mixed surfaces – (1)Decomposed Granite (DG) in heavy traffic areas (mulch might be better? – this was during rain storms) (2)Artificial turf covers small “mounds” or hills in the park Anaheim – Olive Hills Dog Park Page 802 of 1002 4 WHY INTERESTING? •Baskets along fences hold tennis balls (from nearby tennis courts) •“Rolling fence” might be a good feature between small / big dog areas Anaheim – Olive Hills Dog Park Page 803 of 1002 5 WHY INTERESTING? Anaheim – Olive Hills Dog Park •Natural rocks scattered in park give dogs place to jump / sit •No “borders” around trees and they appear healthy despite heavy park use Page 804 of 1002 6 •WeHo currently has 2 dog parks (is building a 3rd). One has artificial turf, the other woodchips. •West Hollywood Dog Park (4,485sf + 7,065sf) opened 2018. B) WeHo – West Hollywood Dog Park Small Dogs Big Dogs Page 805 of 1002 7 WeHo – West Hollywood Dog Park WHY INTERESTING? •Surface is all turf with undulating hills (used K-9 brand turf). •4’ black chain link fence (only 6’ at the entrance). •Aesthetically pleasing shrubbery grows on fence on some sides of park for privacy. Seems to weather ongoing dog pee well. Page 806 of 1002 8 WeHo – West Hollywood Dog Park WHY INTERESTING? •Seating built around some trees •Other trees surrounded by tree wells Page 807 of 1002 9 WeHo – West Hollywood Dog Park WHY INTERESTING? •Colorful signage on weatherproof vinyl board that is changed periodically (pops out and easy to read) •Signage says city has “no liability….” •Signage says “park is “primarily a self-enforcing community” and suggests people to “encourage” others to follow the rules Page 808 of 1002 10 WeHo – West Hollywood Dog Park WHY INTERESTING? •In April 2025, WeHo launched a “ScoopIt” campaign •Campaign included public service announcements (PSAs) in digital transit shelters, pedestrian kiosks, and information displays at City parks and facilities. •PSAs reinforced the message that picking up only takes a few seconds and that it is part of responsibilities as a pet guardian. Detailed messaging highlighted the health and environmental benefits of picking up pet waste and leashing dogs, while also reinforcing the relevant laws. Page 809 of 1002 11 RECENTLY AUTHORIZED “WEST HOLLYWOOD DOG PARKS TURF REPAIR PROJECT” •City prefers turf over woodchips because “it can be cleaned, unlike woodchips, which tend to hold bacteria.” •Currently replacing artificial turf in WeHo park after 8 years (“Typically, the life expectancy for artificial turf at dog parks is between 7-15 years depending on daily use traffic and maintenance activities. Dog parks with a smaller square footage require more frequent repairs because they experience higher impact and overall usage”). •City’s maintenance procedures at their dog parks include twice daily, weekly mid-day, weekly night, and monthly cleaning activities. They contract out to a janitorial firm for this. •Project will use the company ForeverLawn, Inc. to replace turf with newer product that has improved durability, improve grading, create better drainage based on debris and hair removal. •Total cost not to exceed $275,000. WeHo – West Hollywood Dog Park Page 810 of 1002 12 Analysis of Dog Park Surfaces in 2024 from WeHo Parks & Rec Staff Page 811 of 1002 13 •.35 acres (15,246sf). •Large and Timid Dog Area. •Approved 2018 at cost of Cost $830,000. 3 community meetings were held during design phase to get input. C) Marina del Rey – Glen Alla Dog Park Page 812 of 1002 14 Glen Alla Dog Park – Timid Dog Schematic Page 813 of 1002 15 Glen Alla – Large Dog Schematic Page 814 of 1002 16 WHY INTERESTING? •Surface is artificial turf with barriers filled with native plants. •Water area for dogs is on a concrete pad for easier cleanup. Marina del Rey – Glen Alla Dog Park Page 815 of 1002 17 WHY INTERESTING? •Artificial turf has been applied over tree roots. •Artificial turf has been applied up to trunks of other trees. Marina del Rey – Glen Alla Dog Park Page 816 of 1002 18 •17,746sf dog park built in 2017 that is funded and managed by the HOA of Playa Vista. D) Playa Vista – Bluff Creek Park •Small and Big dog area. •Dawn to dusk. Page 817 of 1002 19 WHY INTERESTING? •Mixed surfaces with combination of artificial turf, DG and concrete (also has a water feature). Playa Vista – Bluff Creek Park •Aesthetically pleasing shrubbery grows on fence on street side of the park for privacy. Seems to weather ongoing dog pee well. Page 818 of 1002 20 Marina del Rey - Glen Alla Dog Park WHY INTERESTING? •Artificial turf mounds create small hills in the park that dogs run up and down. •No structures around trees to protect them but most have tree wells packed with DG. Page 819 of 1002 21 WHY INTERESTING? •Humorous signage encourages poop clean up •Small dog area says “Geriatric dogs permitted at owner’s risk” Playa Vista – Bluff Creek Park Page 820 of 1002 SUMMARY 22 •Assuming a location can be agreed to for an off-leash dog park in the City, some of these elements might be incorporated into our park design. •If more detail is desired for any of these parks, Bark for a Park (BFAP) can work to acquire that information using our contacts at each park. •BFAP has been in discussion with a dog park designer who has agreed to look at our top locations, brainstorm what could be done with each space to help in the finalization of a location. Page 821 of 1002 2. IDEA – How City could raise $ for maintenance 23 CURRENTLY •The City sold 1,404 licenses in 2023 and 1,368 in 2024. •Significant number of dogs NOT licensed (we estimate at least 3,000 dogs). Many owners have told us they don’t see the value. •License fee for altered dog in 2026 is $29.75. SUGGESTION •Increase license fee by $5 a dog (raises $6,840 based on 1,368). •Bark for a Park works with city on campaign to increase license numbers including having license checks at the park. •If could increase dog numbers by 400 brings in additional $13,900. •Raises at least $20,740 which could go to dog park maintenance. Fee Increase $5 $10 Dog Increase 400 500 Total Raised 20,740$ 33,555$ Page 822 of 1002 ADDITIONAL SLIDES 24 West Hollywood Dog Park Hours •6am-12am 7 days a week Tree Seating Example •From DogPPL in Santa Monica Page 823 of 1002 1 BARK FOR A PARK (BFAP) OFF-LEASH DOG PARK LOCATION PREFERENCES Sent to the Parks & Recreation Dog Park Subcommittee on April 2, 2026 1. BARK FOR A PARK’S GOAL Bark for a Park (BFAP) is a nonprofit in Hermosa Beach dedicated to the creation of off-leash areas for dogs in the city that will: • Be a positive asset to the city as a whole. • Bring our city together. • Be an asset to the dogs in our community. We have been privileged to work with the Hermosa Beach Parks & Recreation sub-committee over the past few months as they evaluate possible locations in the city. 2. OUR POSITION ON FUNDING THE PARK We respect whatever recommendation the Dog Park Subcommittee suggests but if the Hermosa Beach City Council (Council) follows our suggested location strategy, we would offer to lead and 100% fund (with the City’s oversight) the comprehensive design (including estimate for capital costs and estimate for maintenance costs). If the design is approved by Council, we would offer to lead and fund 100% of the build of the park in a partnership with the City. These activities would be directed using a contract or MOU arrangement. We realize the City has limited discretionary funds to direct to building a new park. Yet there is such large public support that we already have over $70,000 in donations and pledges as of February 11, 2026. We have also recently received a matching grant for up to $250,000 for any donation of $100 or above. Having this matching grant fits in to our desire that this park be built by the community where every contribution matters – and now the community’s support has double the impact. This matching grant is contingent on the City partnering with us on our preferred dog park location which is outlined below. We also strongly support being a compassionate partner to all dogs in the community and would like to partner with the Lovejoy Foundation, a nonprofit, no-kill animal welfare organization that already works with the City on programming, education and engagement at the new dog park. [See Appendix 1 – Vision for Lovejoy Foundation Partnership]. Part of the dog park design process would estimate incremental costs to the City for park maintenance. After construction, we propose the City would handle ongoing park maintenance. We also think there are ways the City could raise additional funds that could offset increased maintenance costs and we would be glad to partner with the City to help develop and execute Page 824 of 1002 2 these ideas such as increasing the number of licensed dogs. [see Appendix 2 – Ideas for Increasing City Funds]. We are so excited at the possibility of working with the City to make an off-leash dog park a reality and to add an amazing asset to the city that will endure for years to come. 3. OUR TOP RECOMMENDATION – VALLEY PARK EAST We believe the ideal location for an off-leash dog park in the City is in Valley Park East which is just east of the bathrooms and south of the native garden. 3.1 PROS This location: • Can support up to a 12,000 square foot park with a small and big dog area and shade. • Minimal to no neighbor impact - more than 200 ft from the nearest neighbor (across the busy streets of Gould and Valley). • Is located in a park that is already used heavily by dogs and is in a relatively underutilized area. • Park would be relatively unnoticed within the park and could be designed to fit into current, natural surroundings. • Great parking and access. • No tree removal required (although root pruning would be needed that would not harm existing trees). • Is more than 70 feet from the playground (Most cities and landscape architects aim for minimum separation: 50–100 feet and barriers in the dog park could add more privacy). • Has an ADA bathroom nearby and access to potable water. 3.2 CONS This location: • Would require ADA improvements to ensure there is a path of travel from Valley Park entrance (probably Kiwanis area) to the dog park entrance and would require grading within the dog park boundary to minimize slope. • Might affect where current summer activities happen but good design choices could disrupt any impacts. Page 825 of 1002 3 3.3 VALLEY PARK EAST SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION We are hoping the Council will approve Valley Park East to move forward to a Comprehensive Design phase under the lead and funding of Bark for a Park with City oversight. We think an off-leash dog park in this area would be an ideal location as it is relatively underutilized, has minimal to no neighbor impact, is large enough to have both a large and small dog area and would result in a wonderful new park asset to the City that could be enjoyed by dogs and residents. ============================================================== 4. BACKUP LOCATION(S) WE DO NOT SUPPORT AT THIS TIME. Below are other locations we considered and why we think they are not ideal: GREENBELT SOUTH OF PIER – A good area for an off-leash dog park could have been the area on the Greenbelt south of Pier Avenue on the east side (stopping before the houses just north of 11th). It is flat, would serve all as it is central to the City, has limited to no neighbor impact. But - it would require a public vote in the November 2026 election, not to put a dog park there, but to alter the zoning in that space so that fencing and off-leash dogs could be allowed. While we love this location, Bark for a Park doesn’t support this location because the efforts and costs required to secure the necessary votes are significant, we have been getting mixed support and there is significant uncertainty of the ability of the measure to pass. BEACH – We love the beach location and are hopeful the City pursue this in the future. But at this time, several senior City officials have indicated a dog beach has gotten significant pushback from the Coastal Commission, Heal the Bay and the LA Lifeguards. Still, we are hopeful that once a fenced off-leash area is implemented we can continue the pursuit of this option. Ideally this would be in a section of the beach (e.g. near 1st Street) with off-peak time hours (e.g. 6-8am and 6-8pm – maybe only in off-season). The goal would be to not unnecessarily burden parking in the area from out of town visitors yet still retain the freedom for locals to enjoy. BI-CENTENNIAL & EDITH RODAWAY. Although both of these areas are already used considerably for on and off-leash dog use, we cannot support these locations at this time because of considerable neighbor impact and their already expressed pushback. Page 826 of 1002 4 SOUTH PARK NORTH OF BATHROOMS. This location does not have neighbors nearby but is very small (~5,000 sf total) and there was a recent Proposition 68 project that was just completed to add drought tolerant landscape to the area. We are uncertain as to whether this location could be repurposed at this time. VALLEY PARK – OFF LEASH – While not ideal, many municipalities have non-fenced off-leash dog areas in parks (e.g. San Francisco has 14 of them). Valley Park has the possibility of having off-leash hours (e.g. 6-8am and 6-8pm) for dogs off-leash with minimal impact. We would hold our support of this idea until all potential dog park areas in the City that could have fencing are eliminated. ================================================== 5. SUMMARY OF OUR RECOMMENDATION Our hope is that the City Council votes to move forward with a Comprehensive Plan for a dog park in the Valley Park East area. Thank you for your time. Respectfully, The Bark for a Park Board Carla Buck, Jack Levy, Mary Ann Benson, Nayiri Dermenjian, Wendy Finster, Tara Gerow, Katie Killam, Emilio Pack, Sam Sampson, Steve Yeager www.barkforapark.org info@barkforapark.org Page 827 of 1002 5 APPENDIX 1 – VISION FOR THE LOVEJOY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP The Lovejoy Foundation is a nonprofit, no-kill animal welfare organization that already works with the City on dog rescues and is familiar to many in the city through volunteer and donation efforts. We would like to partner with Lovejoy to create a vibrant community hub in Hermosa Beach that benefits both local residents and shelter animals. This could include: • Promoting responsible pet ownership through education and community outreach. • Using the dog park for dog exercise, adoption and education programming. • Enhancing compassion and support in Hermosa Beach for animal welfare. We have been meeting with Lovejoy and they are an enthusiastic supporter of working with BFAP and the City to benefit the lives of both residents and the dogs in our community. We hope to work with the City to make this a reality. Page 828 of 1002 6 APPENDIX 2 – INCREASING CITY FUNDS We believe there is additional monies to be made by the City through: • Increasing the cost of dog licenses. • Using an education campaign and periodic spot checks at the park to increase the number of dogs who have licenses in the city. CURRENTLY • They city of Hermosa Beach sold 1,404 licenses in 2023 and 1,368 in 2024. • Significant number of dogs NOT licensed (we estimate at least 3,000 dogs are in the city so perhaps less than half are licensed?). Many owners have told us they don’t see the value of a license. • License fee for an altered dog in 2026 is $29.75. SUGGESTION • Increase license fee by $5 a dog (raises $6,840 per year based on 1,368 dogs). • Bark for a Park works with the City on campaign to increase license numbers through campaign that emphasizes the value of license and having periodic license checks at the park. • If the dog numbers increase by 400 it would bring an additional $13,900 per year. These two changes would raise at least $20,740 which could go to dog park maintenance. In addition to dog license fees, the City could also pursue, perhaps with help from Bark for a Park, sponsorships in the dog park to raise additional monies to offset the cost of maintenance. Page 829 of 1002 FEASIBILITY REPORT ON DESIGNATION OF A LOCATION WITHIN HERMOSA BEACH FOR A DOG PARK May 12, 2026 Meeting Page 830 of 1002 SUMMARY At its March 11, 2025 meeting, City Council directed staff to evaluate the feasibility of an off-leash dog park proposal submitted by the community organization, Bark for a Park. Staff presented the feasibility report to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (Commission) prior to City Council review. The Commission recommended advancing consideration of Valley Park (East) and a portion of the Greenbelt as preferred locations, while also suggesting exploration of a future ballot measure to amend Ordinance No. 89-1001 if the Greenbelt is pursued Page 831 of 1002 BACKGROUND •A feasibility study is a pre-project assessment to better determine the viability, practicality, and potential of a proposed idea or project, conducted before significant investment. •Parks Master Plan, adopted in November 2024, one of the goals outlined to advance was explore current recreational spaces and the feasibility to provide dog-friendly amenities. •At City Council’s March 11, 2025 meeting, during public comment, the community organization Bark for a Park requested that the City consider designating a dog park in Hermosa Beach. Page 832 of 1002 BACKGROUND •At the Commission’s July 1, 2025 meeting, Bark for a Park provided a presentation (Attachment 1) outlining its case for an off-leash dog park in Hermosa Beach, including potential benefits, possible locations, design elements, and estimated costs and funding ideas. Vice-Chairperson Horowitz, with support from Commissioners Moroney and Worner, requested that staff return with a future agenda item to consider the formation of a subcommittee to evaluate the off-leash dog park proposal. •At the Commission’s September 2, 2025 meeting, staff recommended the Commission consider the creation of a Community Dog Park Subcommittee. The Commission approved the creation of the subcommittee, appointing Chair Ellman and Commissioner Worner. Page 833 of 1002 BACKGROUND •At the March 03, 2026 Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed staff’s findings and provided feedback. The Commission recommended that City Council advance consideration of a dog park feasibility study, including the evaluation of potential locations for an off-leash dog area within Hermosa Beach, with the Commission’s preference to further explore a location in Valley Park (East) and within a portion of the Greenbelt- recommended that the City explore the potential for placing a measure on a future November ballot to consider amending Ordinance No. 89-1001 to allow limited construction of new facilities and off-leash dogs within a designated section of the Greenbelt. Page 834 of 1002 DISCUSSION As illustrated in the proposal, basic amenities for an off-leash dog park location (except for consideration of the beach) at minimum requires: •(1) double-door entry system for secure access •(2) minimum 4-to-6 ft. high fencing •(3) potable water source •(4) waste management •(5) shading •(6) dog-friendly surfacing substrates •(7) eco-friendly landscaping and drainage systems •(8) accessibility + ADA, and •(9) clear signage that establishes rules, procedures, release of liability and directions to report issues / suggestions. Page 835 of 1002 DISCUSSION The subcommittee was tasked with working with staff, plus collaborating with Bark for a Park to develop a feasibility report with consideration of: •Best-practice research, including collecting information and data from comparable cities with existing dog parks, such as hours of operation, cost estimates for design, construction, equipment, and ongoing maintenance, funding sources, community feedback, and review of policies and procedures; •Evaluation and site visits of potential locations (Table 1) within Hermosa Beach (Attachment 2-3); and •On-site visits of comparable cities’ dog park facilities (Table 2). Page 836 of 1002 DISCUSSION Table 1: Potential Off-Leash Dog Park Locations Table 2: Comparable cities’ Dog Park facilities Page 837 of 1002 DISCUSSION The onsite review (Attachment 4) of potential off-leash dog park locations in Hermosa Beach and off-site comparable cities considered various elements including, basic amenities required, proximity, impacts to current park use, park features, existing infrastructure, and the landscape. Key takeaways from the comparable sites include: El Segundo and Redondo Beach were in close proximity to residential areas. Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach dog parks are incorporated into multi-use parks with sports fields and other amenities. El Segundo and Redondo Beach have dirt surfaces (previously grass) with no additional lighting at the facility, large holes exposed in the ground, leftover personal play equipment on-site, and minimal upkeeping dependent on residents or volunteers. Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach had limited shade and R.B. had noticeable odors from dog waste. El Segundo and Redondo Beach rely on public support/volunteers for upkeeping. All three sites lacked nearby restrooms or ADA-accessible paths into the facility, but ample parking was available. Page 838 of 1002 DISCUSSION Following the completion of best-practice research, evaluation and on-site visits, the subcommittee developed a list of locations for City Council to consider of potential sites where an off-leash dog park could be incorporated based on feasibility, layout, and amenities criteria. Valley Park – East (North-East) Greenbelt (portion) Edith Rodaway Friendship Park Bi-Centennial Park The Beach (portion) Page 839 of 1002 DISCUSSION Location – Valley Park East (North-East) Page 840 of 1002 DISCUSSION Location – Valley Park East (North-East) Potential Benefits include: •Natural shading •Nearby pathways, open green space, restrooms, parking lot, and street parking spaces •Nearby pathways and open green space •Existing irrigation, lighting, and drainage infrastructure •Would occupy a passive section of the open green space Notable Potential Challenges include: •Uneven surface, steep grade slopes, ADA concerns •Environmental impacts & deterioration (exposed tree roots, garden) •Potential impacts to nearby residential area and noise complaints •Conflicts with city programming areas and close proximity to the playground •ADA concerns Page 841 of 1002 DISCUSSION Location - Greenbelt Page 842 of 1002 DISCUSSION Location - Greenbelt Potential Benefits include: •Central location in Hermosa Beach & near the civic center •Minimal impact on homes/residences •Flatter surface, natural environment, and shading •Nearby public restrooms and public parking lot •More easily supports ADA requirements (further evaluation required) •Potential to incorporate two sections, for small and big dog separation •High foot traffic for residents with dogs, supports local businesses. Notable Potential Challenges include: •No lighting (hours- dusk to dawn), New piping installation for potable water •No direct route per se •OS-1 Zone*, which is designated for open space and passive recreational uses, typically limiting construction of new structures or facilities that could disrupt the natural or passive character of the areaPage 843 of 1002 DISCUSSION Location – Greenbelt On June 7, 1988, City voters approved local ballot measure Proposition D, authorizing the City to set aside funds to purchase the Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way for conversion to open space and recreational use. November 7, 1989, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 89-1001, which renamed the purchased property as the Greenbelt, preserved it for parkland and open space purposes, and mandated that all dogs be on a leash within the Greenbelt. Section 6 of the Ordinance states that no provision may be amended without a vote of the people. As a result, any amendment to allow an off-leash dog park in the Greenbelt would require a public electoral vote (ballot measure) and a majority Yes vote for approval. Any ordinance revision would only apply to a specific section of the Greenbelt, designated specifically for a dog park, and it would not be recommended to amend the ordinance in its entirety. Page 844 of 1002 DISCUSSION Location - Greenbelt Page 845 of 1002 DISCUSSION Location – Edith Rodaway Friendship Park Page 846 of 1002 DISCUSSION Location – Edith Rodaway Friendship Park Potential Benefits include: •Flat surface with some natural shading •Open green space with limited conflicting park amenities •Nearby, though limited, street parking spaces •Existing potable water, irrigation, drainage, and fencing infrastructure •Popular location for residents with dogs Notable Potential Challenges include: •Compacted residential area and potential noise complaints •No direct route, restrooms, or lighting (hours would be dusk to dawn) •Would occupy a large section of the open green space •Potential impact on the annual Pumpkins in the Park special event and other city programming •Would likely require ADA improvements to the park Page 847 of 1002 DISCUSSION Location – Bi-Centennial Park Page 848 of 1002 DISCUSSION Location – Bi-Centennial Park Potential Benefits include: •Flat surface with natural shading •Direct routes, options for accessibility improvements, and open green space with no conflicting park amenities •Existing potable water, irrigation, lighting, drainage, waste stations, and fencing infrastructure •Current destination for local residents with dogs Notable Potential Challenges include: •Dense residential area, shared fencing to houses, and potential noise complaints •No restrooms, not currently ADA •Very limited street parking available •Would occupy a large section of the open green space Page 849 of 1002 DISCUSSION Location – The Beach (Herondo St. – 1st St.) Page 850 of 1002 DISCUSSION Location – The Beach (Herondo St. – 1st St.) Potential Benefits include: •Relatively flat, less utilized open space in the area (beach) •Option for limited use hours and open access zones (no fencing required) •Nearby restrooms •Minimal impactful to nearby residences Notable Potential Challenges include: •Approval likely required from the California Coastal Commission •Limited parking available + Herondo St. Condo impacts to residents •Accessibility challenges: not ADA-compliant, and no potable water, irrigation, lighting, drainage, or fencing infrastructure onsite •Environmental study required to assess potential impacts •Sanitation, health, and maintenance concerns due to the sand surface •LA County Lifeguard & Visitor impacts on the beach Page 851 of 1002 DISCUSSION Location – Valley Park East (North-East) On January 21, 2026, staff, a member of the subcommittee, and Bark for a Park met onsite at Valley Park and the Greenbelt with a Principal Designer from Gaudet Design Group Inc. for an informal discussion of the prospective locations. To summarize: •Valley Park (East): Concerns with the slope of the surface and ADA access for the area. Accessible pathways (walkways) must have a maximum running slope (path of travel) of 1:20 (5 percent) and a cross slope not exceeding 1:48 (2 percent). Any path with a slope steeper than 5 percent is considered a ramp. This could require significant grading, including flattening and surface removal of the hillside (entrance) and ADA updates to all pathways in Valley Park leading into the area. •Greenbelt (section): The designer expressed confidence that this area would be feasible for a dog park or dog run and identified it as more ideal among the two sites considered. Page 852 of 1002 Bark for a Park Recommendation On February 11, 2026, Bark for a Park board submitted its requests for preferred locations in Hermosa Beach for an off-leash dog park, which included the section of the Greenbelt as its primary choice and Bi- Centennial Park as a secondary option if a ballot measure for the Greenbelt does not receive public approval. On April 2nd, 2026, Bark for a Park informed staff (Attachment 7) to remove the Greenbelt option as their preferred location citing concerns for Council and resident support, as well as financial costs associated with processing a Citizen-Sponsored Initiative. However, they would proceed if City Council elects to pursue the Greenbelt option with a City-Initiative Measure. Page 853 of 1002 Bark for a Park Recommendation Bark for a Park requests for its preferred location in Hermosa Beach, is the Valley Park – East location for City Council to consider. Bark for a Park has verbally agreed to assume financial responsibility for all pre-development costs, including (but not limited to): •Architectural design, •Construction •Supplies and equipment •Required permits, and inspections, to be further determined if a specific location is selected. Page 854 of 1002 Bark for a Park Recommendation Bark for a Park has requested that, upon completion of construction, the City assume full responsibility for the dog park facility and ongoing maintenance. Estimated ongoing maintenance could include but is not limited to: • Opening and closing the facility daily • Daily and weekly cleaning • Removing personal belongings • Emptying waste stations and resupplying waste bag stations • Replacing or cleaning signage displaying rules and regulations • Filling surfacing issues and repairs to fencing, seating, or other amenities • Irrigation and maintenance of surfaces, vegetation, and substrates Page 855 of 1002 Options for Council Consideration: 1.Provide direction to staff to proceed with the preparation of a comprehensive feasibility report for a specific location, including one of the locations recommended by the Commission, Valley Park (East) or a portion of the Greenbelt, or another location identified in this report. 2.Provide direction to staff to evaluate multiple locations, including one or both of the Commission-recommended locations and/or alternative locations proposed by the Bark for the Park, and return with a comprehensive feasibility analysis comparing each site. 3.Provide direction to staff to evaluate an alternative location not identified in this report, as determined by City Council, and return with a comprehensive feasibility report. 4.Determine that no location is feasible at this time and direct staff to discontinue further evaluation of an off-leash dog park within Hermosa Beach. Page 856 of 1002 Next Steps Should City Council direct staff to proceed with further evaluation, a comprehensive feasibility report would be required and presented at a future City Council meeting as a Public Hearing item for public participation and formal approval. The comprehensive report would require the Public Works Department oversight and include: Creation of an MOU a design consultant, plans, estimated capital costs, such as site preparation and grading, fencing and gates, surface material, lighting, shade structures, water access, waste stations, and signage. ongoing maintenance costs, including waste removal, irrigation and turf care, equipment repairs, cleaning, staffing/oversight, and general upkeep. community outreach, including a survey of residents in proximity to the proposed location(s); and required permitting Page 857 of 1002 Next Steps Ongoing maintenance requirements for the dog park are anticipated to be notable, requiring regular attention and daily service to maintain a consistent high standard based on observations from comparable facilities. This would require dedicated staff resources, with a desire for organized community volunteer efforts as well, and ongoing operational funding to support a safe, clean, and functional environment for public use. Staff would recommended consideration of an agreement for Bark for a Park to support with ongoing facility upkeeping, and funding assistance for annual repair and maintenance costs. Page 858 of 1002 Page 859 of 1002 Page 860 of 1002 Page 861 of 1002 Page 862 of 1002 Page 863 of 1002 Page 864 of 1002 Page 865 of 1002 Page 866 of 1002 Page 867 of 1002 Page 868 of 1002 Page 869 of 1002 Page 870 of 1002 Page 871 of 1002 Redactions were made pursuant to Government Code §§ 7928.300 and 7922.000. Page 872 of 1002 Page 873 of 1002 Page 874 of 1002 Page 875 of 1002 Page 876 of 1002 Page 877 of 1002 Page 878 of 1002 Page 879 of 1002 Page 880 of 1002 Page 881 of 1002 Page 882 of 1002 Page 883 of 1002 Page 884 of 1002 Page 885 of 1002 Page 886 of 1002 Page 887 of 1002 Page 888 of 1002 Page 889 of 1002 Redactions were made pursuant to Government Code §§ 7928.300 and 7922.000. Page 890 of 1002 Page 891 of 1002 Page 892 of 1002 Melinda Green Hermosa Beach @gmail.com Hermosa Beach City Council 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Opposition to Hermosa Beach Dog Park Proposal Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: I am writing to oppose placement of a dog park at Valley Park. I am an active community member, live on Gould Avenue, and will be directly impacted by the nuisance of a dog park and loss of valuable community space. A Dog Park will Negatively Impact Families The proposed location of Valley Park East will eliminate space that is currently utilized by my family for many purposes. During the summer, my daughter attends Valley Park Day Camp which utilizes that area for lawn games. Valley Park is one of the few affordable camp options in the area that offers full day coverage. My older son and his friends ride their mountain bikes in that area of the park frequently. My children participate in Scouting and that space is used for activities during campfires. All these activities will be eliminated or impacted by noise, smell of dog waste, and the inherent risk of unknown adults in close proximity with children. Hermosa Beach is facing a declining number of young families, which has created issues in reduced enrollment to local schools. A move by the Council to remove park space and place strangers with dogs next to a playground and school makes the City a less welcoming environment for families. A Dog Park Creates Safety Issues at Hermosa Vista School My understanding is that there has been no engagement with either the School Board or School District regarding placing a dog park in public space adjoining Vista School and parallel to a designated safe route to school. Many children at Vista are dropped off along Valley Drive and walk through the park unsupervised to ease traffic congestion. This proposal has those students walking directly next to a dog park. Many students also play in the playground after school which will be denigrated by noise and smell from the dog park. The proposed hours of the dog park are 7am to 8pm which occur during school hours. Staff acknowledged in the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee on March 6, 2026, that is Page 893 of 1002 not possible to limit park usage to Hermosa Beach residents, meaning there will be people from outside the community who enter Valley Park and are in proximity and sharing bathrooms with students from Hermosa Vista School and other children at the playground. There is no funding for a city staff member to monitor the safety issues caused by a dog park in Valley Park. A dog park will also exacerbate the parking shortage and traffic congestion in this area, which is already strained considerably by school drop offs and pickups. A Dog Park will Drain City Resources The report notes that an off-leash dog park will have initial capital costs and ongoing operation and maintenance costs including staff time. At the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee on March 6, 2026, it was noted that Manhattan Beach spends $84,000 per year on maintenance alone. That does not include staff time to monitor a dog park, respond to emergencies and complaints, the large initial cost of building of the dog park, and costs to upgrade the park. Bark for the Park suggests the city can redirect money from dog licenses and raise dog license fees to support a dog park. This ignores what money from dog licenses is currently funding and that it is insufficient to support a dog park. Bark for the Park also requests an exemption to allow corporate advertising on the dog park. Such signage is inappropriate in Valley Park. Bark for the Park estimates a cost of $72,000- $235,000 for the initial build of the dog park and attaches a generic “Appendix 3.0” which cites to no reliable sources supporting this estimate. I know this Council is well-informed on building costs to understand this amount is a gross underestimate. The City is facing the burden of funding significant capital projects – most notably the pier infrastructure – there is no room in the budget for a unnecessary expense requested by a small minority of residents who cannot be inconvenienced by traveling one mile to the neighboring dog parks. A Dog Park Creates Safety Issues1 Along with the funding issues, Bark for the Park suggests limiting the park to vaccinated dogs, spayed and neutered dogs, dogs above 4 months old, that are wearing a collar with ID tags. The only way to enforce this is with draining our limited staff resources. 1 The Bark for the Park Presentation cites frequently to a UC Davis Veterinary School study on dog parks in urban areas. The citation provided for this report is inoperable and it is not attached as an appendix. I could not find this study with a google search. I emailed the email address listed on Bark for the Park website to request a valid citation and they did not respond to me. Nor has anyone from Bark for the Park reached out to seek input from neighbors who will be directly impacted by the proposed dog park. Page 894 of 1002 In my experience, dog parks are full of poorly behaved dogs and negligent owners. Our dog trainer recommended against bringing our dog to a dog park. I have visited both the Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach dog parks and determined they are not safe spaces for myself or my dog. There are many options to exercise dogs, the best exercise for a dog and owner is to walk a dog, there are dog parks in neighboring cities (including a dog park one mile from Valley Park), and there are doggy day cares which allow dogs to play off leash for a nominal fee that covers ensuring the dogs are supervised and vaccinated. A Dog Park will Ruin the Character of Valley Park At the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee on March 6, 2026, a representative of Bark for the Park spoke and admitted that a dog park in Valley Park is a non-preferred location because it would “ruin the character of Valley Park.” Additionally, that the designer had concerns with Valley Park not being appropriate for a dog park. Despite these admissions, Bark for the Park is now advocating for a dog park in Valley Park with corporate sponsor signage as their top recommendation. Valley Park is the largest park in Hermosa Beach. It is beautiful, naturally sloped with trees and a garden. A dog park will create an eyesore that ruins the natural beauty of Valley Park with noise from barking dogs and the smell of dog waste. Hermosa Beach is a densely populated city with very little green space that should not be removed from broader public usage. A Dog Park at Valley Park Inconveniences Neighbors and Impacts Property Values A dog park in Valley Park is a significant inconvenience to neighbors. It will put up unsightly fencing, bring additional foot and car traffic, and create noise and smell issues. A dog park will decrease property values to homeowners in the area. Hermosa Beach does Not Need a Dog Park In a perfect world, Hermosa Beach would have plenty of outdoor space and funding for a dog park. But that is not the case. Resources – financial and environmental – are scarce. There are plenty of options for dogs to exercise and few spaces that have as much use to the community as Valley Park. Bark for the Park does not answer the simple question of “why is this needed?” There are plenty of options for dogs to play on and off leash within a few miles of Valley Park. I ask that the Council be realistic about the City’s needs and decide that a feasible location has not been identified for a dog park. If the City chooses to approve proceed with a comprehensive feasibility study, I ask for a location that is not in Valley Park. Sincerely, Melinda Green Page 895 of 1002 Page 896 of 1002 Page 897 of 1002 Page 898 of 1002 Page 899 of 1002 Page 900 of 1002 Page 901 of 1002 Page 902 of 1002 Page 903 of 1002 Page 904 of 1002 Page 905 of 1002 Page 906 of 1002 Page 907 of 1002 Page 908 of 1002 Page 909 of 1002 Page 910 of 1002 Page 911 of 1002 SUPPLEMENTAL testimony from Howard Lee to the 05-13-2026, 6-PM HB City Council Meeting’s Municipal Matters Item 17.b Page 1 of 3 SUPPLEMENTAL eComment testimony to the Tuesday, May-13-2026, 6-PM Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting for Municipal Matters Item-17.b To: Hermosa Beach City Council, City Manager, BB&K Contract City Attorney, City Clerk, and others: From: Howard Lee, Hermosa Beach Resident Re: Dog Park Consideration HBCC meeting of 05-13-2026 Posted to these eComments and advance-copied to HB city officials May 13, 2026 Full agenda direct link.. https://pub-hermosabeach.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=c39fa65e-ce61-4fd9-948e- 7546132658f5&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English Go to the full agenda using the above link, drill down to Municipal Matters Item 17.b to view the following item’s staff report, attachments and eComments. (eScribe’s incredibly user-unfriendly design unfortunately does not provide a useable single direct hyper-link to Item 17.b, with its Staff Report, attachments, and all eComments within) Municipal Matters Item 17.b DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018 (Senior Recreation Supervisor Brian Sousa) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council review and consider the feasibility of designating a location within Hermosa Beach for an off-leash dog park and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission’s recommendation to further explore potential locations at Valley Park (East) and within a portion of the Greenbelt, and to consider the potential for a future ballot measure to amend Ordinance No. 89-1001. Honorable Council and others: With all due respect the dog park issue is completely out of control. The residents interested in this matter should have long-ago used their energy to create a people’s initiative and placed the matter on the ballot. They easily could have qualified it by now. That they didn’t may indicate they may not want all of the people of the city to have a say in this matter. That would be more than unfortunate if true. The idea that these interested residents today may also indicate they will cover all city costs of such dog park is commendable, however, virtually impossible to cast into law. Page 912 of 1002 SUPPLEMENTAL testimony from Howard Lee to the 05-13-2026, 6-PM HB City Council Meeting’s Municipal Matters Item 17.b Page 2 of 3 Thus how such payment process will actually work well and into the future and then what is the real legality of having a lay council (here today, gone tomorrow) awarding a specific area of public lands of the city for the de facto financed control of a specific group of individuals, having a specific interest, is more than questionable and nebulous at best. The proper way for this to work is for the council to therefore create a ballot measure specifying the parameters and location of a so-called dog park, specifications, hours, and true costs, etc. The city will need to cover the costs of the dog park as with any park, although obviously people are always welcome to make donations to the City, donations toward the specific dog park, as with budget items, however with no special entitlements or encumbrances necessarily being awarded them. Notwithstanding the complete fiscal crisis the city is evidently now in and very much aware, there evidently have been perhaps no donations made for all the staff and commission time already expended to date for this dog park issue, yet there is apparently many folk in town with and without dogs who are not necessarily aware of, or interested in a dog park, which may or may not be located anywhere near their residence. The fact that so many in city may have dogs also is not a reflection of a specific need for a dog park. People who located to Hermosa Beach no doubt did so without respect to the presence or lack of presence of a dog park. The logic used through this entire dog park issue has been defective, and somewhat highly-biased to say the least. A dog park for this 1.4 square mile city, and especially in part of the city’s most important community park (other than the beach itself) makes very little sense. The city has limits and cannot be all things. Btw, sooner or later, HB will merge with Manhattan Beach or Redondo Beach out of fiscal necessity and benefit to all concerned. Hopefully the other group filibustering for a swimming pool de facto complex should first push for the city merger as clearly desirable as it may be that their swimming pool complex currently has little chance of being anywhere close to viable. Ask former C.M. Suja regarding the Taj Mahal City Hall concept, or for that matter can you say City Yard? Hello!!!!!!!! Those aware of the El Segundo dog park on inside Imperial Highway (divided for both small dogs and large dogs) should be well aware of the constant comings and goings of vehicles from other cities to there, and the negative effects for the residents of so many transients coming and going with their dogs, as if Valley Park the city’s main community park doesn’t already have parking issues. Page 913 of 1002 SUPPLEMENTAL testimony from Howard Lee to the 05-13-2026, 6-PM HB City Council Meeting’s Municipal Matters Item 17.b Page 3 of 3 The fair way to handle this matter is to place a well-specified measure on the ballot (requires a noticed Public Hearing to approve the measure perhaps) for the community as a whole to see the specifications, parameters, etc., etc. and to decide after full debate during the election period, of all particulars and actual costs known by all. For a lay-city-council to railroad this dog park through on its own, would be a mistake. Also, for a lay council of 5, three of whom are likely running for re-election, or others seeking election to the council very soon, to presume this is an issue to support or aid in their election may well be very foolish to assume. I.e. Dog park folly. Best to stay very neutral if running for city council in the November election, i.e. pulling papers in August, 90 days from now. It would best be for the Council again, to place a very carefully worded measure on the ballot and allow the voters to decide this matter. For some fifty years I’ve personally noted many such feel-good issues come before council where it seemed as if the entire city, let alone the entire planet, supported same. Often, how wrong that may have been the case. It’s called “Packing the Chambers” week after week with proponents of an idea. The best decisions result when all know really what is actually going on. In this particular matter, believe it or not, all may not really know what is going on. Most respectfully. Page 914 of 1002 Redactions were made pursuant to Government Code §§ 7928.300 and 7922.000. Page 915 of 1002 Redactions were made pursuant to Government Code §§ 7928.300 and 7922.000. Page 916 of 1002 Redactions were made pursuant to Government Code §§ 7928.300 and 7922.000. Page 917 of 1002 Page 918 of 1002 Page 919 of 1002 Page 920 of 1002 Page 921 of 1002 Page 922 of 1002 Page 923 of 1002 Page 924 of 1002 Page 925 of 1002 Page 926 of 1002 Page 927 of 1002 Page 928 of 1002 Page 929 of 1002 Page 930 of 1002 Page 931 of 1002 Paul Repetti Page 932 of 1002 Page 933 of 1002 Page 934 of 1002 Page 935 of 1002 Page 936 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 7 Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PR-025 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CONSIDERATION OF INCREASE TO PICKLEBALL MEMBERSHIP AND RESERVATION FEES (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council consider one of the following fee options pertaining to the Kelly Pickleball Courts; 1. Maintain the current annual membership rate of $19 and hourly reservation rate of $9 per hour for residents; 2. Approve staff’s recommended annual membership rate of $25 and hourly reservation rate of $12 per hour for residents; or 3. Approve City Council’s suggested rates, provided at its March 24, 2026 meeting, of an annual membership rate of $25 and an hourly reservation ra te of $15 per hour for residents. Executive Summary: At its April 14, 2026 meeting, City Council directed staff to conduct a fee study to develop recommendations on the annual membership and hourly reservation rates for the Kelly Pickleball Courts. Staff conducted a review of local cities’ fees related to pickleball memberships and reservations and recommends that City Council consider the fee options presented in the staff report. Background: At its March 24, 2026, meeting, City Council approved modifications to the Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy (Attachment 1), including updated hours of operation from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. daily, revisions to permissible play equipment, and designation of Courts 1 through 4 for both reservation and walk-on play on all days, except Fridays, when all courts are designated for walk-on play only. Additionally, City Council directed staff to return within 90 days of the reopening of the courts with a report on any complaints or community feedback received and court usage. During the discussion, City Council expressed support for modifying pickleball membership fees to $25 annually and court reservation fees to $15 per hour for residents and provided direction to staff regarding those potential changes. However, following the March 24, 2026, City Council meeting, the City received timely written demands to cure Page 937 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 7 and correct pursuant to Government Code Section 54960.1 from several members of the public. Therefore, at its April 14, 2026, City Council meeting, City Council rescinded its March 24, 2026, action related to pickleball fee increases and directed staff to conduct a fee study and return with fee recommendations prior to the reopening of the Kelly Pickleball Courts. Past Commission and Council Actions Meeting Date Description Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission: February 10, 2026 The Commission approved staff’s recommended Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy modifications with the exception of modifications to the courts’ hours of operation. The Commission recommended City Council approve maintaining the current hours of operations and requested staff report back to the Commission within 120 days following reopening with a report on complaints, community feedback, and court usage. City Council: March 24, 2026 City Council approved modifications to the Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy, including revisions to permissible play equipment, designation of all courts as available for reservation except on Fridays, which would be reserved for walk-on play only, and establishment of daily hours of operation from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and directed staff to return within 90 days of the reopening of the Kely Pickleball Courts with a report on complaints, community feedback, and court usage. Council also expressed support for modifying pickleball membership fees to $25 annually and court reservation fees to $15 per hour for residents. City Council: April 14, 2026 City Council cured and corrected its prior direction to staff regarding pickleball membership and reservation fees and directed staff to conduct a fee study and return with fee recommendations prior to the reopening of the Kelly Pickleball Courts. Discussion: Staff conducted a review of local cities’ fees related to pickleball memberships and reservations, which is included in Table 1. Also included in Table 1 are the current fees for Hermosa Beach. Page 938 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 7 Table 1: Local Cities Pickleball Reservation and Membership Fees City, Facility, and Total Dedicated Courts Hourly Reservation Annual Membership Other Hermosa Beach – Kelly Pickleball Courts 4 courts Residents: $9 $19 - Manhattan Beach – Manhattan Heights Park 3 courts Residents: $12 Non-residents: $16 - Drop-in Play Passes (designated hours: Monday-Friday 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.) Residents: $220 annually $20 per month $40 per two months $60 per three months Senior Residents: $160 annually $15 per month $30 per two months $45 per three months Non-residents: $280 annually $25 per month $50 per two months $75 per three months Redondo Beach – Alta Vista Park 4 Courts Residents/Non-residents Monday, Wednesday, and Friday: 12:00-6:00 p.m.: $10 6:00-9:00 p.m.: $12 Tuesday and Thursday: 8:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.: $12 12:00-5:00 p.m.: $10 Saturday and Sunday: 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.: $12 5:00-8:00 p.m.: $10 $25 Drop-in Play Monday, Wednesday, and Friday 8:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.: $5 Tuesday and Thursday 5:00 - 9:00 p.m.: $5 Torrance – Dee Hardison Sports Center 2 Indoor Courts Courts are first-come, first-served - Drop-in Play Monday and Wednesday 10:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m.: $5 per day Page 939 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 7 City, Facility, and Total Dedicated Courts Hourly Reservation Annual Membership Other El Segundo – Recreation Park 4 Courts Residents: $10 Non-residents: $20 Rec ID - required to reserve at the resident rate for all City facility rentals Youth (ages 3 - 17) $10.00 Adults (age 18 - 61) $15.00 Senior (62 and over) $5.00 Lomita – Lomita Park Courts are first-come, first-served - - In summary, a review of local cities indicates that pickleball pricing and access models are generally consistent, with some variation in structure. Hourly reservation fees for residents typically range from approximately $10 to $12 per hour, while non-resident rates are higher. Some agencies, including Redondo Beach, implement time -of-day pricing. Based on this review, staff recommends increasing the current resident reservation fee from $9 per hour to $12 per hour. Staff does not recommend allowing non-residents to obtain a membership or make reservations. The current policy only allows residents to obtain a membership to make reservations, and staff would recommend maintaining this approach. Prior to the courts being closed for renovation, the courts were reserved approximately 98% of the time, and obtaining a reservation was highly competitive due to strong demand. While this occurred when only two courts were available and hours were more limited, demand is anticipated to remain high upon reopening. For this same reason, staff does not recommend implementing a time-of-day pricing at the Kelly Pickleball Courts at this time. If City Council is interested in exploring allowing non-residents to obtain a membership to make reservations or time-of-day pricing in the future, staff recommends revisiting this option following completion of the court usage report to be presented after 90 days post - reopening, which will provide more accurate data on court usage under the expanded court capacity and hours. Additionally, based on the review of local cities, membership models are not consistently applied across all. However, staff recommends maintaining the annual membership requirement for residents to be able to access the reservation system. I t provides a mechanism to manage access to a high -demand facility while further supporting cost recovery for tasks associated with managing reservations. Such tasks include but are not limited to ensuring reservation compliance; daily posting of reservation signage; Page 940 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 7 conducting routine site checks throughout the day; checking in with reservation holders; and modifying or canceling reservations in accordance with established policies and member requests. Staff would recommend the annual membership rate be increased to $25, in line with the cost of the annual membership for Redondo Beach. Some cities also provide a drop-in play model; however, staff would not recommend implementing such a model in Hermosa Beach, as the Parks and Recreation Department does not have dedicated onsite staff to monitor court usage. While staff perform routine checks, they are also responsible for overseeing multiple indoor and outdoor recreational facilities citywide, and a drop-in system without consistent onsite supervision could create operational and enforcement challenges. For informational purposes, staff is including the following supplemental information to the fee study. While this level of detail is not typically included in a recreation fee study, where the study focuses on market comparisons and consideration of staff time required to provide the service, staff has provided the information below to offer additional context and to support a broader understanding of the historical and operational considerations associated with the Kelly Pickleball Courts. Prior Litigation Costs The City was previously involved in litigation arising from an incident whereby a patron sustained injuries when playing pickleball on April 10, 2019 at the Kelly Pickleball Courts. The matter was resolved through a Settlement and Release Agreement (settlement) for $3M executed on October 26, 2021, which was funded through the City’s insurance provider, Independent Cities Risk Management Authority, subject to applicable deductibles and cost-sharing provisions, and certain site safety improvements. The settlement expressly provided that the resolution of the matter did not constitute an admission of liability by the City. Because litigation and insurance-related costs are managed through the City’s risk pool and are not allocated at the facility or program level, this information is provided for general context only and is not incorporated into the fee analysis. Capital Costs (Project Costs) As the Kelly Courts Renovation Project is not yet complete, total project costs are still being finalized. The City Council awarded a contract for $825,999, plus a $244,942 contingency, which is available for use if needed. Staff has completed all scope items with the current contractor but is in the process of retaining a completion contractor to finish the remaining resurfacing work for the tennis and pickleball courts. At this time, those negotiations are still underway, but staff anticipates that the remaining work can be completed within the approved budget for the CIP. The pickleball courts make up roughly 25% of the total area of the Kelly Courts facility; therefore, it is reasonable to estimate that the cost for pickleball court renovation is approximately 25% of the overall project cost, approximately $206,000 to $268,000, pending final negotiations. Page 941 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 6 of 7 Maintenance Estimated annual maintenance and utility costs associated with the pickleball courts are approximately $8,900 annually. Administrative Overhead The anticipated annual direct labor cost for the Parks and Recreation Department to oversee the Pickleball Membership Program and associated reservation system is approximately $11,000. With the addition of a 10–15% administrative overhead to account for indirect City support services, the total estimated annual cost is approximately $12,100 to $12,650. Options for Council Consideration: Staff recommends City Council consider one of the following options: 1. Maintain the current annual membership rate of $19 and hourly reservation rate of $9 per hour for residents; 2. Approve staff’s recommended annual membership rate of $25 and hourly reservation rate of $12 per hour for residents; or 3. Approve City Council’s suggested rates, provided at its March 24, 2026 meetin g, of an annual membership rate of $25 and an hourly reservation rate of $15 per hour for residents. Based on the option approved by City Council, staff would prepare the necessary code amendments and update the City’s Master Fee Schedule to reflect the adopted fees and return to City Council for review and consideration through a public hearing. Fiscal Impact: Depending on the option selected by City Council pertaining to the Kelly Pickleball Court annual membership and reservation rates for residents, anticipated revenue to the General Fund would be as follows: Option Membership Reservation Total Revenue Option 1: $19 annual / $9 hourly reservation $7500 $46,000 $53,500 Option 2: $25 annual / $12 hourly reservation $9,900 $61,300 $71,200 Option 3: $25 annual / $15 hourly reservation $9,900 $76,700 $86,600 Attachments: 1. Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy Page 942 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 7 of 7 Respectfully Submitted by: Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 943 of 1002 KELLY PICKLEBALL COURTS USE POLICY City of Hermosa Beach • Parks and Recreation Department 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0280 hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov Office Hours: Monday–Thursday, 7:00 am–6:00 pm PICKLEBALL COURTS The Pickleball Courts are available to the public with a balance of recreational and instructional play. RULES AND REGULATIONS 1. Hours of Operation: 9:00 am–7:00 pm daily. 2. Only traditional pickleball play is permitted unless otherwise approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. 3. Singles and doubles play is permitted. 4. A maximum of one-hour play is allowed when others are waiting to play. 5. City-sponsored activities have priority over all reservations and drop-in play on all courts. 6. All classes, tournaments, instruction, and organized activities require prior permit approval by the Parks and Recreation Department. 7. Courts 1–4 are available for reservation and walk-on play except on Fridays, when all courts are designated for walk-on play only and are not available for reservations. 8. Reservations may be made by Hermosa Beach residents only. 9. Reserved times are posted on each court and are updated on a daily basis. 10. Pickleball etiquette and sportsmanship shall always be present. 11. Only approved equipment outlined in the Kelly Courts Use Policy is allowed. 12. Animals are not permitted in the court areas at any time. 13. Users of the pickleball courts are expected to maintain the integrity and cleanliness of the courts at all times. The following items and actions are strictly prohibited: o Food and beverages in glass containers o Chalk, paint, or other markings on the court surface o Any acts of defacing, damaging, or altering the court or signage in any way 14. Report any court damage or vandalism through the City’s GoHermosa! App immediately. 15. The City reserves the right to close the courts at any time due to inclement weather, maintenance needs, or unsafe conditions. 16. Play at your own risk. 17. Violation of these rules and regulations may result in suspension of court privileges and/or other enforcement actions as determined by the Community Resources Department. EQUIPMENT 1. Only paddles specifically designed for pickleball are permitted. Paddles must have a polypropylene or composite core and a fiberglass, graphite, or composite face. Wood, aluminum, metal, stringed, modified, or homemade paddles are prohibited. 2. Pickleball balls that create excessive noise, pose safety concerns, or risk damage to the court surface are prohibited. Dura Fast pickleballs are not permitted. 3. Use of foam pickleballs is encouraged for casual play, drills, or instructional purposes, as approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. 4. Court Protection: The Parks and Recreation Department reserves the authority to determine whether equipment complies with this policy. RESERVATIONS 1. Hermosa Beach residents must hold a valid annual Pickleball Membership to reserve a court. 2. Pickleball Memberships may be purchased through the Parks and Recreation Department during office hours. Membership applications may be submitted in person or electronically by email to hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov. Proof of residency is required and may be provided by a government-issued photo identification showing a current Hermosa Beach address. If the photo identification does not reflect a current Hermosa Beach address, a utility bill dated within the past 30 days must also be submitted. 3. Reservations are issued on a first-come, first-served basis and may be made no sooner than one day and no more than seven days in advance, for a maximum of two hours per member, per day by email to hbconnect@hermosabeach.oc or through the online reservation system. The online reservation system opens at 7:00 am on the earliest eligible advance reservation day. 4. All reservation fees are due at the time the reservation is made. 5. Reservations may only be modified on the same calendar day they are made and must be modified during office hours by email to hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov. 6. Refunds will only be issued due to inclement weather or City -initiated court closures. Members are responsible for notifying the Parks and Recreation Department within 24 hours of the cancelled reservation date to be eligible for a refund. 7. The City reserves the right to cancel or modify reservations due to maintenance needs, unsafe conditions, or City-sponsored activities. Page 944 of 1002 CONSIDERATION OF INCREASE TO PICKLEBALL MEMBERSHIP AND RESERVATION FEES Page 945 of 1002 Background •Comparable Agencies Reviewed o Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, El Segundo, Torrance, and Lomita •Resident Reservations typically $10-$12/hour Page 946 of 1002 CURRENT HERMOSA BEACH FEES AND TRENDS $9/hour resident reservations $19 annual membership High Demand Reserved 98% of available time prior to court renovation project Page 947 of 1002 OPTIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION •Option 1 -$19 annual & $9 hourly o Anticipated revenue: $53,500 •Option 2 (Staff Recommendation) -$25 annual & $12 hourly o Anticipated revenue: $71,200 •Option 3 -$25 annual & $15 hourly o Anticipated revenue: $86,600 Page 948 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-CMO-029 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY’S PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE LOS ANGELES COASTAL AREA SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY (City Manager Steve Napolitano) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Provide direction on whether the City of Hermosa Beach should participate in the National Park Service (NPS) Los Angeles Coastal Area Special Resource Study; and 2. Provide direction on whether to provide comments to National Park Services Resource Study. Executive Summary: The National Park Service (NPS), under direction from Congress (Public Law 117 -328, Section 634), enacted in December 2022, has initiated a Special Res ource Study (SRS) evaluating portions of the Los Angeles County coastline. This includes areas from Will Rogers State Beach to Torrance Beach for potential inclusion in the National Park System. The NPS is asking for the City’s approval to be included in the SRS. Background: The City of Hermosa Beach lies within the study area. The study will assess whether coastal resources meet federal criteria for national park designation and evaluate potential management alternatives. A Special Resource Study is a formal evaluation conducted by the NPS to determine whether an area is eligible for designation as a unit of the National Park System. The NPS anticipates completing this study by early 2027. The study evaluates the following four criterias: National Significance Suitability Feasibility Need for Direct NPS Management Page 949 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 3 If the study finds qualifying resources, recommendations are submitted to Congress. Any designation would require Congressional action or presidential proclamation. The coastal zone under consideration generally extends from the mean high tide line inland approximately 200 yards. California Coastal Commission Potential Impacts: The Coastal Commission’s authority comes from the California Coastal Act of 1976. The Coastal Act governs Coastal development permits, public access, environmental protection, and local coastal program (LCP) oversight. Nothing in the NPS Special Resource Study overrides or replaces that authority. If and when the national park designation is recommended and approved, the Coastal Commission would retain permitting authority in the coastal zone. If the National Park Service becomes involved, projects may require dual coordination between NPS and the Coastal Commission. It may add complexity to permitting coastal access improvements. However, being part of the NPS may provide more access to federal funding opportunities for coastal improvements. Discussion: An initial public comment period was open from February 5 through April 6, 2026. The public comment period was extended to May 23, 2026. Additional engagement opportunities are expected as the study progresses. The NPS is currently seeking input from local agencies, stakeholders, and the public. City Council direction is requested regarding whether Hermosa Beach should participate in this process. Additionally, the City of Hermosa Beach may consider not to be included in this study. If the Council chooses not to participate, the City may forgo any future designation as a national park. Participation in the study provides the City an opportunity to: Ensure local priorities and concerns are represented Clarify the City’s role in any future management scenarios Advocate for preservation, access, and local control considerations Options for Council Consideration: Option 1: Approve the City’s participation in the NPS study and direct staff to: Submit formal comments on behalf of the City Coordinate with regional agencies Monitor study progress Return to Council with updates Page 950 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 3 Option 2: No Participation Take no action at this time. Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action. Any future impacts are unknown at this time. Attachments: 1. National Park Service Letter Request 2. Los Angeles Coastal Area Special Resource Study Newsletter Respectfully Submitted by: Leo Zalyan, Management Analyst Concur: Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 951 of 1002 United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DENVER SERVICE CENTER 1 Denver Federal Center, Bldg. 50 P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225-0287 May 4, 2026 Steve Napolitano City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. Napolitano, I am contacting you because it is our understanding that the City is the owner of Hermosa City Beach. If you have received this letter in error, please disregard this notice. In that case and if possible, the favor of your assistance in providing any information about the correct recipient and contact information would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance. I am interested in learning about your property because the National Park Service (NPS) is currently conducting a special resource study of sites associated with the Los Angeles coastal area. As background, the study is being prepared as directed by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 (Public Law 117-328). The law directs the study to place special focus on the following areas: • The coastline and adjacent areas to the Santa Monica Bay from Will Rogers State Beach to Torrance Beach. • The area in and around Ballona Creek. • The area in and around the Baldwin Hills. • The area in and around the San Pedro section of the City of Los Angeles, excluding the Port of Los Angeles north of Crescent Avenue. A special resource study evaluates resources (such as historic sites) using congressionally established criteria for national significance, suitability, feasibility, and need for direct NPS management. Based on this evaluation, the National Park Service will analyze whether any of the above study sites meet the criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the National Park System as a national park unit, either in part or as a whole. At the conclusion of the study, the Secretary of the Interior will submit the study findings to Congress for its consideration. The study itself does not result in a national park designation or any other special designation, but the study can be used by Congress to inform further action, such as designating one or more of the study sites as a Page 952 of 1002 new national park unit. Only Congress or the President of the United States has the authority to designate a new unit of the National Park System. The special resource study process involves gathering and evaluating information about each site, conducting historical research, and seeking public input on the potential of the study sites becoming a national park unit, individually or collectively. You can find updates about the study on the project webpage, https://parkplanning.nps.gov/LosAngelesCoastal. If you approve of your property being included in the study analysis, the study team would gather information about the property and collect information to support an analysis of the property's national significance, suitability, feasibility, and potential need for direct NPS management. Including your feedback is important for this analysis so that any information about your property reflects your information and feedback accurately. To this end, we would appreciate your answers to the following questions: 1. Who or what organization owns and/or manages your property? 2. How is the site currently being used? Do any events happen there, and if so, what type of events? Is the site open to the community or to the public in any way? 3. Do you want to work with the National Park Service on this study’s analysis of historical significance and feasibility as a potential national park unit of some form, if a park that interprets the history of the Los Angeles coastal area is considered by Congress in the future? Do you want your property to be included in this study? 4. Would you support the creation of a national park unit that involves your property in some way, whether through historical interpretation or public visitation, possibly by forming a partnership with the National Park Service? 5. Do you have any concerns about interpreting the history of the Los Angeles coastal area at your property? If so, what are your concerns? 6. Do you have any concerns about maintaining the physical appearance and condition of your property now or in the future, particularly the features that contribute to its historical significance? 7. If the opportunity to donate or sell your property at a fair market value to the U.S. Government were to arise at some point in the future, would you be interested in this possibility? Please note that the federal government would only consider property acquisition through willing sellers for donations or purchases. Page 953 of 1002 8. Is there anything you would like us to know about your property? Finally, please know that it is entirely your decision on whether your property is included in the special resource study. If you choose not to participate, we will not include your property in the study’s analysis. I would like to follow up with you with a phone call to seek your feedback on whether the property can be included, and to answer any questions you may have. If possible, please contact me at 720-415-1290 or at sarah_bodo@nps.gov. Many thanks for your time and attention to this matter. I hope to hear from you. Sincerely, Sarah Bodo, Project Manager National Park Service Denver Service Center Planning Division SARAH BODO Digitally signed by SARAH BODO Date: 2026.05.04 16:37:16 -07'00' Page 954 of 1002 Page 955 of 1002 Page 956 of 1002 Page 957 of 1002 Page 958 of 1002 CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY’S PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE LOS ANGELES COASTAL AREA SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY City of Hermosa Beach May 12, 2026 Page 959 of 1002 Background ▪Per Public Law 117-328, enacted in December 2022, initiated a Special Resource Study evaluating portions of the Los Angeles County coastline. ▪Study areas include from Will Rogers State Beach to Torrance Beach for potential inclusion in the National Park System (NPS). ▪The study will assess whether coastal resources meet federal criteria for national park designation and evaluate potential management alternatives. ▪The coastal zone under consideration generally extends from the mean high tide line inland approximately 200 yards. Page 960 of 1002 NPS Study Steps ▪The NPS anticipates completing this study by early 2027. ▪If the study finds qualifying resources, recommendations are submitted to Congress. ▪Any designation would require Congressional action or presidential proclamation. Page 961 of 1002 Coastal Commission Potential Impacts ▪The Coastal Commission’s authority comes from the California Coastal Act of 1976. ▪The Act governs Coastal development permits, public access, environmental protection, and local coastal program (LCP) oversight. ▪If and when the national park designation is recommended and approved, the Coastal Commission would retain permitting authority in the coastal zone. ▪If the National Park Service becomes involved, projects may require dual coordination between NPS and the Coastal Commission. Page 962 of 1002 Discussion ▪National Park Servies is seeking input from agencies, stakeholders and the public. Staff is seeking direction: 1.Consideration of City's Participation in the NPS Study by submission of comments and responses to NPS Questions; or 2.Decline to participate in the NPS Study. Page 963 of 1002 CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY’S PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE LOS ANGELES COASTAL AREA SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY City of Hermosa Beach May 12, 2026 Page 964 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PD-008 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council INFORMATIONAL ITEM TO DISCUSS IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR ALCOHOL-SERVING ESTABLISHMENTS Information items are for discussion only. No action will be taken. A City Council majority may request an action item to return at a future meeting. (Police Chief Landon Phillips) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file an informational report discussing identification requirements for alcohol-serving establishments, and provide direction, if so desired. Executive Summary: At the September 9, 2025, City Council meeting, the City Council requested an information report on electronic identification scanners. This report provides an overview of electronic identification scanners, shared feedback from The California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) and outlines future practices. Background: At the September 9, 2025, City Council meeting, the City Council requested to discuss the possibility of implementing identification requirements for alcoholic beverage establishment, and if feasible, include input from ABC, and include available technology to combat fake identification. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description September 9, 2025 Councilmember Jackson, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Detoy, requested staff to provide an information report on identification scanners. Discussion: Identification (ID) scanners are devices or software applications that read and process information from identification documents, such as driver licenses and ID cards. Their main functions include data capture, age verification, fraud detection, and audit trail creation. ID scanners perform these functions through image capture, data extraction, authentication, and data processing and storage. For alcoholic beverage establishments, ID scanners help verify age and detect fraudulent driver licenses. Page 965 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 3 Feedback from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control The Hermosa Beach Police Department coordinated with ABC to understand the best methods for detecting fraudulent IDs. ABC advised that the best method to detect fraudulent IDs is having a trained employee checking each ID by hand and by sight. They pointed out that most ID checks are completed too quickly, in under ten (10) seconds, which is not enough time to verify if an ID is authentic. ABC advised that proper ID checks should take longer and include touching the ID, confirming the birth and expiration date, and matching the photo to the physical appearance of the individual. ABC was unable to endorse or recommend a specific type of ID scanner, noting that scanners may allow fraudulent IDs to pass and should not be relied upon as the sole method of detection. While some scanners retain a digital picture of the scanned ID, which proves useful during investigations, it doesn’t prevent the ID from being accepted at the point of sale. For an alcoholic beverage establishment, ABC recommends requiring the installation of camera(s) that are focused on areas where ID verification is conducted. Video footage captured by these cameras has been useful in previous cases involving the purchase of alcohol with fraudulent IDs. Actions for Council Consideration: While ID scanning technology continues to advance, so have fraudulent IDs. Advanced fraudulent IDs can bypass even modern ID scanners. Although ID scanners alone will not eliminate the problem, it can help detect them when combined with a thorough manual and visual verification. The City of Hermosa Beach cannot require existing alcoholic beverage establishments to install ID scanners but can be considered to be a requirement as a condition of approval for new alcoholic beverage establishments requiring a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) or when an amendment to an existing CUP is requested. For alcoholic beverage establishments requiring a CUP, the City currently imposes standard conditions of approval like mandatory Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) training for staff. Moving forward, a condition of approval requiring the installation of an ID scanner, to the satisfaction of the Hermosa Beach Police Department, may be imposed on new alcoholic beverage establishments, as well as a requirement for vide o surveillance of the ID verification area. Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with this information report. Attachments: 1. Correspondence Respectfully Submitted by: Johnny Case, Assistant Planner Concur: Eric Cahalan, Police Captain Concur: Alexis Oropeza, Planning Manager Concur: Alison Becker, Community Development Director Page 966 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 3 Concur: Landon Phillips, Police Chief Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 967 of 1002 Redactions have been made pursuant to Government Code §§ 7923.600–7923.625, 7928.300, and 7929.210. Page 968 of 1002 INFORMATIONAL ITEM TO DISCUSS IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR ALCOHOL-SERVING ESTABLISHMENTS May 12, 2026 Page 969 of 1002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •September 9, 2025, City Council meeting •City Council requested an information report on electronic identification scanners. Page 970 of 1002 BACKGROUND •City Council requested to discuss the possibility of implementing identification requirements for alcoholic beverage establishment, and if feasible, include input from ABC, and include available technology to combat fake identification. Page 971 of 1002 DISCUSSION •ID scanners can read and process information from identification documents such as driver licenses and ID cards o Data capture o Age verification o Fraud detection o Audit trail •May help detect fraudulent ID cards Page 972 of 1002 Recommendation from ABC •Best method to detect fraudulent IDs is with a thorough check by hand and sight •Most checks are done in under 10 seconds which is not enough time o Confirm birth date, expiration date, matching photo, physical appearance Page 973 of 1002 Recommendation from ABC •Fraudulent IDs have improved and may not be detected by scanners o Not reliable •Installation of cameras at the point of sale •Video will assist with follow up investigations Page 974 of 1002 DISCUSSION •City cannot require existing establishments to use ID scanners •Can be considered as a requirement for new or amended CUP •Require additional conditions of approval for any new or amended CUP o ABC LEAD training o ID scanners o Video requirements Page 975 of 1002 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1.Receive and file this informational report, and provide direction, if so desired Page 976 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-CMO-024 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 1942: ELECTRIC BICYCLES: REGISTRATION AND SPECIAL LICENSE PLATES Information items are for discussion only. No action will be taken. A City Council majority may request an action item to return at a future meeting. (Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council discuss providing a letter of support for Assembly Bill 1942. Executive Summary: The City of Hermosa Beach regularly expresses its support or opposition regarding legislative matters that would have an impact on the City. As requested by the City Council at its March 10, 2026, City Council meeting, staff presents the following item for consideration to provide a letter of support for Assembly Bill 1942 Electric bicycles: registration and special license plates. Background: Assembly Bill 1942 (AB 1942) was introduced February 13, 2026 , by Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, and proposes mandatory Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) registration and license plates for Class II and Class III electric bicycles (e-bikes). The bill aims to improve safety and accountability, mandates rear plates, proof of ownership and creates an Electric Bicycle Registration Fund that will fund the administration, implementation, and enforcement of the new mandatory registration and licensing program for Class II and Class III e-bikes. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description March 10, 2026 Councilmember Rob Saemann requested, and Councilmember Keegan supported a future agenda item to provide a letter of support for Assembly Bill 1942. Page 977 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 3 Analysis: Unlike vehicles and motorcycles, e-bikes are not currently required to display license plates, making it difficult to identify riders involved in dangerous behavior or violations of traffic laws. Under the proposed bill, AB 1942 would require the following: Class II and Class III electric bicycles to be registered with the DMV; Class II and Class III electric bicycles to have a clearly displayed license plate issued by the DMV; Riders to possess proof of ownership matching the serial number of the electri c bicycle; The DMV to establish and develop a registration process for electric bicycles; and Creation of the Electric Bicycle Registration Fund AB 1942 would also require the DMV to adopt regulations to implement these requirements and would make a person operating a Class II or Class III e-bike in violation of these requirements guilty of an infraction punishable by specified fines. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Furthermore, the bill would create the Electric Bicycle Registration Fund in the State Treasury, require all moneys received by the department pursuant to these provisions to be deposited in the fund, and require all moneys in the fund to be available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to the department for the administration of these provisions. The bill would also appropriate an unspecified sum of moneys from the General Fund to the Electric Bicycle Registration Fund as a loan for purposes of administering these provisions. As of April 28, 2026, the League of California Cities (League) authored a letter of support if the current bill is amended. The following amendments have been proposed by the League: 1. Apply the Program to All E-Bike Classifications (Class I, II, and III) Limiting the program to only Class II and Class III devices create enforcement ambiguity and undermines the goal of a clear, consistent regulatory framework. From a city enforcement perspective, distinctions between classifications are not always readily apparent in real time. A comprehensive approach that include s all three classes will improve compliance, reduce confusion, and support equitable application of the law. 2. Establish a Clear and Reasonable Cap on Registration Fees While the bill appropriately limits fees to “reasonable regulatory costs,” additional clarity is needed to ensure affordability and prevent cost barriers—particularly for lower income residents who rely on e-bikes as an accessible transportation option. Page 978 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 3 A defined, reasonable fee cap will help balance program sustainability with equity considerations and maintain access to this important mobility option. 3. Require Readily Identifiable Visual Markers by Classification For the program to be effective, law enforcement must be able to quickly and reliably identify the classification of an e-bike from a distance. The League recommends requiring unique visual identifiers, such as color-coded license plates, decals, or other standardized markers for each classification. This will enhance field-level enforcement, improve compliance, and reduce relian ce on time-intensive verification methods. This bill is currently in the first House under Fiscal review. Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Respectfully Submitted by: Sara Russo, Senior Management Analyst Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 979 of 1002 ASSEMBLY BILL 1942 Page 980 of 1002 Background •Introduced February 13, 2026 •Proposes mandatory Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) registration and license plates for Class II and Class III electric bicycles •The bill aims to improve safety and accountability, mandates rear plates, proof of ownership and creates an Electric Bicycle Registration Fund Page 981 of 1002 ANALYSIS Proposed Current Bill: •Class II and Class III electric bicycles to be registered with the DMV; •Class II and Class III electric bicycles to have a clearly displayed license plate issued by the DMV; •Riders to possess proof of ownership matching the serial number of the electric bicycle; •The DMV to establish and develop a registration process for electric bicycles; and •Creation of the Electric Bicycle Registration Fund Page 982 of 1002 ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) League of California Cities Proposes Bill Amendments: •Apply the program to all E-Bike classifications (Class I, II, and III) •Establish a clear and reasonable cap on registration fees •Require readily identifiable visual markers by classification Page 983 of 1002 RECOMMENDATION Options: •Receive and file the report; or •Direct staff to write a letter of support as the bill currently stands; or •Direct staff to write a letter of support using the amendments proposed by the League Page 984 of 1002 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 12, 2025 Staff Report No. 26-CMO-030 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information. The tentative future agenda provides a preliminary preview of topics planned for discussion at upcoming City Council meetings over a specified period, typically the next three months. The items listed in this document are "tentatively" scheduled, meaning they are subject to change and should not be considered final until the official agenda for each meeting is posted. This document is a work in progress and offers a glimpse into the City's priorities and planned discussions, allowing stakeholders to anticipate and prepare for potential topics of interest. Key Features of a Tentative Future Agenda Document: 1. Tentative Schedule: Each agenda item is assigned a tentative date, indicating when it is expected to be discussed. These dates are provisional and may be adjusted based on various factors. 2. Work in Progress: The document is continuously updated as new items emerge, priorities shift, or additional information becomes available. This flexibility ensures City Council can address the most pressing issues in a timely manner. 3. Transparency and Communication: By publishing a tentative future agenda, the City aims to maintain transparency with residents, businesses, and other stakeholders. It helps the community stay informed about potential topics of discussion and provides an opportunity for public engagement and preparation. 4. Fluid Scheduling: The scheduling of agenda items is fluid until the official agenda for a specific City Council meeting is posted. Changes can occur due to various reasons, such as new developments, additional preparatory work required, or changes in workload or priority. Attachment: Tentative Future Agenda Items Page 985 of 1002 CITY COUNCIL TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA Revised: May 7, 2026 at 10:40 A.M. MAY 26, 2026 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATECLOSED SESSION MAY 26, 2026 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS RECOGNIZING HERMOSA BEACH 2025 CERTIFIED GREEN BUSINESSES PRESENTATION ON COMMUNITY OPINION SURVEY RESULTS CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Administrative Services Director Ongoing Cash Balance Report for March 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing Revenue Report, Expenditure Report, and CIP Report by Project for March 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing City Treasurer’s Report for April 2026 City Treasurer Ongoing Capital Improvement Program Status Report Public Works Director Ongoing Rotary Club of Hermosa Beach Farmer’s Market Agreement 2026 –2028 Parks and Recreation Director Staff Request Apr. 27, 2026 PUBLIC HEARINGS Zoning Code Update - Administrative Procedures Community Development Director Staff Request Jul. 23, 2025 Consider increasing the City's contract threshold limits, including the City Manager's signing authority and the guidelines for consent calendar approval. (supported by: Detoy, Keegan, and Francois) (Continued from April 28, 2026) Administrative Services Director Council Direction Mar. 10, 2026 Adoption of Kelly Pickleball Court Reservation and Membership Fee and modification of the Master Fee Schedule Parks and Recreation Director Council Direction May 12, 2025 MUNICIPAL MATTERS Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget - Department Presentations (Continued from May 12, 2026 if needed) Administrative Services Director Annual Endorsement of Arakelian Enterprises, Inc (DBA Athens Services) Request for an Annual Rate Adjustment to the Maximum Rate for Solid Waste Services Environmental Programs Manager Staff Request Mar. 16, 2026 Award of contract for preparing a vulnerability assessment and sea level rise adaptation plan (between $600K - $700K) Environmental Programs Manager Staff Request Mar. 9, 2026 Consideration of Special Event Policy Guide and Fee Updates Parks and Recreation Director Staff Request Apr. 21, 2026 Award of Professional Services Agreement for California Environmental Quality Control Act (CEQA) Project Analysis and other Environmental Services for the Public Works City Yard Public Works Director Staff Request Feb. 25, 2026 Adoption of resolutions regarding the Engineer’s Report and setting June 23, 2026, for the public hearing for the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District FY 2026–2027 Public Works Director Annual FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Los Angeles County Fire and Ambulance Monthly Report for January, February, and March 2026 Emergency Management Coordinator Ongoing Page 986 of 1002 2 Action minutes of the Public Works Commission Meeting of March 18, 2026 Public Works Director Ongoing Police Crime Statistics for April 2026 Police Chief Ongoing Action minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of April 21, 2026 and May 5, 2026 Community Development Director Ongoing THURSDAY, MAY 28, 2026 @ 6:00 PM BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICANT INTERIVEWS THURSDAY, MAY 28, 2026 @ 7:00 PM STUDY SESSION: FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page 987 of 1002 3 JUNE 9, 2026 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION JUNE 9, 2026 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS PROCLAMATION DECLARING JUNE AS PRIDE MONTH IN HERMOSA BEACH CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Administrative Services Director Ongoing Approval of Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Senate Bill 1) Project List for the City of Hermosa Beach for Fiscal Year 2026-27 Public Works Director Annual PUBLIC HEARINGS Adoption of Fiscal Year 2026–27 Budget Administrative Services Director Annual MUNICIPAL MATTERS Two Appointments to Public Works Commission and One Appointment to Civil Service Board City Clerk Annual Consideration of Resolutions Calling and Giving Notice Pertaining to the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election to be Conducted by the Los Angeles County Registrar - Recorder/County Clerk City Clerk Election Years (No later than June) Award of contracts for on-call broker/dealer services Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer Staff Request Apr. 20, 2026 Award of Construction Contract for CIP 107 - Citywide Slurry Seal Project (~$380K) Public Works Director Staff Request Apr. 28, 2026 Award of Professional Service Agreements for On-Call Environmental Monitoring and Testing Services (Two contracts at $200K each) Public Works Director Staff Request Feb. 25, 2026 Award of Construction Contract for CIP 504 - Playground Equipment Replacement Project (~$220K) Public Works Director Staff Request Apr. 30, 2026 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Action minutes of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting of May 5, 2026 Parks and Recreation Director Ongoing Parking Citation and Revenue Report – May 2026 Senior Management Analyst Ongoing Page 988 of 1002 4 JUNE 23, 2026 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION JUNE 23, 2026 @ 6:00 PM CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Administrative Services Director Ongoing Cash Balance Report for April 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing Revenue Report, Expenditure Report, and CIP Report by Project for April 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing City Treasurer’s Report for May 2026 City Treasurer Ongoing Capital Improvement Program Status Report Public Works Director Ongoing Consideration of a Resolution Amending the Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk Biennial Second Reading - Zoning Code Update - Administrative Procedures Community Development Director Council Direction May 26, 2026 PUBLIC HEARINGS Annual Staffing Vacancies Report – Assembly Bill 2561 (AB 2561) Human Resources Manager Annual Public Hearing to Review Delinquent Solid Waste Collection (Refuse) Charges for Consideration of Placing Said Charges on the Property Tax Rolls as a Special Assessment Affecting Only Those Properties with Refuse Bills Delinquent as of March 31, 2026 Environmental Programs Manager Annual Adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and levying assessments for the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026–2027. Public Works Director Annual Public Hearing on the Annual Levy of Sewer Charges on the Property Tax Roll Public Works Director Annual MUNICIPAL MATTERS HCD Annual Progress Report on Housing Community Development Director Staff Request Feb. 11, 2026 Surfers Walk of Fame Relocation Review Parks and Recreation Director Council Direction Mar. 24, 2026 Informational Item to Explore a Pilot Program for an Entertainment Zone for Special Events (supported by: Jackson and Saemann) Parks and Recreation Director Council Direction Apr. 14, 2026 Adopt a Policy Regarding Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service During City Council Meetings to Comply with SB 707 (Senate Bill 707) City Clerk Staff Request May 4, 2026 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Los Angeles County Fire and Ambulance Monthly Report for April 2026 Emergency Management Coordinator Ongoing Police Crime Statistics for May 2026 Police Chief Ongoing Action minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 19, 2026 Community Development Director Ongoing Page 989 of 1002 5 NO MEETING - JULY 14, 2026 (DARK FOR SUMMER VACATION SEASON) JULY 28, 2026 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION JULY 28, 2026 @ 6:00 PM CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Administrative Services Director Ongoing Cash Balance Report for May 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing Revenue Report, Expenditure Report, and CIP Report by Project for May 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing City Treasurer’s Report for June 2026 City Treasurer Ongoing Capital Improvement Program Status Report Public Works Director Ongoing FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Los Angeles County Fire and Ambulance Monthly Report for May 2026 Emergency Management Coordinator Ongoing Police Crime Statistics for June 2026 Police Chief Ongoing Action minutes of the Public Works Commission Meeting of May 20, 2026 Public Works Director Ongoing Action minutes of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting of June 2, 2026 Parks and Recreation Director Ongoing Action minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 16, 2026 Community Development Director Ongoing NO MEETING – AUGUST 11, 2026 (DARK FOR SUMMER VACATION SEASON) Page 990 of 1002 6 PENDING NEW ITEMS STATUS / TENTATIVE MEETING DATE (Updated 12/29/25) Landscape and Street Lighting District Assessment Adjustment (mail-in election authorization) Initiated by: Council Direction Jul. 9, 2019 Public Works Director Pending staff availability. If council agrees to advance the adjustment, it will need to go to a citywide ballot in compliance with Proposition 218. Emergency Services Municipal Code Chapter 2.56 Update Emergency Management Coordinator Waiting for State to review proposed language changes Consideration of licensing agreement/fees for use of City logo Initiated by: Council Direction Jun. 9, 2020 City Attorney/City Clerk The City will develop a licensing agreement for commercial uses of the City logo as part of a comprehensive Administrative Memorandum (AM) on City Branding and Logo Use by City Staff. City staff will begin drafting the AM after finalizing the City’s style guide and filing its “Intent to Use” trademark application for the City logo with the USPTO. As part of developing a Licensing Agreement for the Commercial Use of the City Logo, staff will establish a process for reviewing and handling these requests. This process will likely include the negotiation of royalties and as well as the preparation of a staff report to obtain Council approval to enter into the agreement. Only after the City receives the issuance of a Notice of Allowance from the USPTO can it begin approving applications for commercial uses of the logo. Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission Volleyball Court Use Subcommittee was formed to review all aspects of the beach volleyball courts located in the residential area Initiated: 2021 Parks and Recreation Director To be completed in the first quarter of 2026. PLAN Hermosa 5-year check-in on milestones (Supported by Massey, Campbell, Armato, Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction October 26, 2021 Community Development Director/Environmen tal Program Manager The next update to City Council will be in 2026 Page 991 of 1002 7 Consideration of rules that would govern operation of off-sale alcohol establishments in downtown and consideration of queuing for on-sale alcohol establishments. (supported by Massey, Saemann and Detoy) Initiated by: Council Direction June 13, 2023 Community Development/Polic e Chief/Deputy City Manager Ordinance to be established to address items. Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey and review of provisions in California Assembly Bill 43 that are anticipated to become effective on or about June 30, 2024. Initiated by: Unanimous Council Direction July 25, 2023 Public Works Director Pending staffing availability and completion of other previously requested future agenda items. Targeting Summer 2026. Request Public Works Commission to review fines and other consequences involved with illegal tree removal and return to Council as an action item for discussion and deliberation. (supported by Saemann, Francois, Detoy) Initiated by: Council Direction August 13, 2024 Public Works Director Pending staffing availability and completion of other previously requested future agenda items. Explore Best Practices for Undergrounding. (supported by: Detoy, Saemann, and Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction November 12, 2024 Public Works Director Pending staffing availability and completion of other previously requested future agenda items. Staff will also need to request funding in the future budget cycle to support bringing in appropriate consulting expertise on this item. Refer the public pool discussion to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission for review prior to City Council. (supported by Saemann, Detoy, and Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction June 24, 2025 Parks and Recreation Director Pending Commission Review Hermosa Beach Lawn Bowling Club Operations (supported by Jackson, Detoy, and Keegan) Initiated by: Council Direction June 24, 2025 Parks and Recreation Director Under Legal Review Consideration of Adding Another Accessible Beach Mat, Modifications to Existing Layout, and Potential for Outside Funding for a Permanent Installation (supported by: Francois, Saemann and Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction August 26, 2025 Public Works Director Item will return to Council after review by the Public Works Commission Agendize discussion on Rosenberg’s Rules of Order and Robert’s Rules of Order at the next City Council Retreat (supported by: Detoy and Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction September 9, 2025 City Manager The next City Council Retreat will be scheduled once a permanent City Manager is appointed Informational Item for Public Works Commission to study maximizing and expanding the street parking inventory through the analysis of the City's red curb standard to include studying golfcart parking spaces for reduced streets and studying the Driveway Parking Permit Program. (supported by: Jackson and Saemann) Initiated by: Council Direction September 9, 2025 Public Works Director Pending staffing availability and completion of other previously requested future agenda items. Informational Item to review the feasibility of collecting Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) for short-term vacation rentals that are out of compliance, and of collecting unpaid fines from illegal short-term vacation rentals. (supported by: Jackson and Saemann) Initiated by: Council Direction September 9, 2025 Administrative Services Director Staff will come back to Council in the next few months for an update. Page 992 of 1002 8 Informational Item to Consider Including Dispatch Services as Part of Bid for Fire Services (supported by: Keegan and Saemann) Initiated by: Council Direction April 28, 2026 City Manager Consideration of rescinding current CDP application for Short Term Rentals and have Staff bring back potential regulations that would expand STR opportunities throughout City and compare those to successful programs in other cities, including all rules and penalties that those cities employ, for potential revenue to City (supported by: Keegan, Saemann, and Francois) Initiated by: Council Direction August 28, 2026 Community Development Director Page 993 of 1002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2026 (Regular Meeting Times: Closed Sessions at 5:00 PM and Open Sessions at 6:00 PM) Page 1 of 2 (Revised 5-7-26) JANUARY 13, 2026 JANUARY 27, 2026 FEBRUARY 3, 2026 FEBRUARY 24, 2026 (ELECTION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE) MARCH 10, 2026 MARCH 24, 2026 APRIL 14, 2026 APRIL 28, 2026 FY 2026–2027 BUDGET STUDY SESSION MAY 12, 2026 MAY 26, 2026 THURSDAY, MAY 28, 2026 FY 2026–2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY SESSION JUNE 9, 2026 (ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026–2027 BUDGET) JUNE 23, 2026 NO MEETING JULY 14, 2026 (DARK) JULY 28, 2026 January 5–7, 2026: CCCA Legislative Tour in Sacramento, CA May 14–17, 2026 (Tentative Dates): CCCA Annual Municipal Seminar July 9–12, 2026: ICA Summer Seminar June 4–7, 2026: U.S. Conference of Mayors Annual Meeting in Long Beach, CA January 15, 2026: State of the City Address January 21–23, 2026 (Sacramento): League of California Cities New Mayors & Council Members Academy May 7–8, 2026: SCAG Regional Conference and General Assembly in Palm Desert, CA February 9-13, 2026: HBCSD Ski Week February 20-22, 2026: ICA Winter Seminar in Santa Barbara, CA January 28–30, 2026: U.S. Conference of Mayors Winter Meeting in D.C. February 20-22, 2026: ICA Winter Seminar in Santa Barbara, CA June 12, 2026: HBCSD Summer Break Begins Summer Vacation Season Passover begins at sunset on April 1, 2026 and ends at nightfall on April 9, 2026 (No work permitted) April 6–10, 2026: HBCSD Spring Break Page 994 of 1002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2026 (Regular Meeting Times: Closed Sessions at 5:00 PM and Open Sessions at 6:00 PM) Page 2 of 2 (Revised 5-7-26) NO MEETING AUGUST 11, 2026 (DARK) AUGUST 25, 2026 SEPTEMBER 8, 2026 SEPTEMBER 22, 2026 OCTOBER 13, 2026 OCTOBER 27, 2026 NOVEMBER 10, 2026 NO MEETING NOVEMBER 24, 2026 (DARK) THURSDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2026 CERTIFICATON OF NOVEMBER 2026 ELECTION, INSTALLATION OF NEW OFFICERS, AND ELECTION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE DECEMBER 8, 2026 NO MEETING DECEMBER 22, 2026 (DARK) Rosh Hashanah begins at sunset on September 11, 2026 and ends at nightfall on September 13, 2026 (No work permitted) Yom Kippur begins at sunset on September 20, 2026 and ends at nightfall on September 21, 2026 (No work permitted) September 4–6, 2026 (Tentative Dates): CCCA Annual Fall Educational Summit Summer Vacation Season Winter Holiday Season Chanukah begins sunset of December 4, 2026 and ends nightfall of December 12, 2026 (work permitted, except Shabbat – Friday evening to Saturday evening) September 23–25, 2026: League of California Cities Annual Conference at Anaheim Convention Center Thanksgiving Week November 11, 2026: Veteran’s Day Holiday November 3, 2026: General Election (Three City Council Seats) Page 995 of 1002 CITY MANAGER UPDATE May 12, 2026 Page 996 of 1002 Update for May 12 , 2026 •Memorial Day Holiday –Monday, May 25 ➢City Hall and Community Center Offices closed. ➢Police,Public Works, and Fire personnel will remain available. Police non-emergency line is 310-524-2750. ➢Street sweeping and PCH parking enforcement suspended. All other parking regulations remain in effect. ➢No construction work permitted. ➢Trash collection will be delayed by one day. Page 997 of 1002 Power BI Desktop Total Parking Meter Revenue $0.0M $0.2M $0.4M $0.6M January February March April May June July August September October November December January February March April Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 2025 2026 $360,901 $342,457 $421,150 $411,743 $474,356 $576,958 $657,873 $623,067 $462,681 $404,907 $425,249 $315,836 $549,972 $515,630 $683,758 $616,813 $0.29M $0.28M $0.33M $0.33M $0.38M $0.46M $0.50M $0.45M $0.33M $0.29M $0.31M $0.22M $0.39M $0.35M $0.45M $0.37M $0.08M $0.12M $0.14M $0.11M $0.09M $0.10M $0.09M $0.13M $0.14M $0.20M $0.18M IPS Coin Revenue IPS Credit Card Revenue ParkMobile Revenue Flowbird CC Revenue Flowbird Coin Revenue Citywide Percentage of Coin Revenue 4% 6% 8% Jan 2025 Mar 2025 May 2025 Jul 2025 Sep 2025 Nov 2025 Jan 2026 Mar 2026 6.84% 4.04% 3.97%6.71% 5.29% 5.51% 6.21%4.25%4.03%4.17% 5.71%6.19%6.52% 4.54% 5.62% 6.62% Parking Revenue Breakdown by Payment Method Month All Year Multiple select… Citywide Percentage of Revenue by Vendor 0% 50% 100% January February March April May June July August September October November December January February March April 2025 2026 81%81%79%80%81%79%75%72%70%73%72%69%72%68%66%61% 22%24%22%23%27%24%28%30%30% IPS Coin Revenue IPS Credit Card Revenue ParkMobile Revenue Flowbird CC Revenue Flowbird Coin Revenue Page 998 of 1002 Power BI Desktop 2026 2026Parking Citation Issuance Summary Total Citations Issued 0K 5K January February March April May June July August September October November December 2026 4,328 3,958 4,379 3,747 5,254 5,401 4,843 4,275 3,446 4,064 3,294 3,20237353362 4004 3589 Previous Year Citations Current Year Citiations Violation Description 0K 2K EXPIRED METER EXPIRED METER SPACE POSTED NO PARKING DISPLAY OF PLATES *SEE BACKSIDE EXP METER YL POST TIME LIMIT 1 HOUR NO PKG WED 8AM-11AM NO PKG MON 8AM-11AM NO PKG TUES 8AM-11AM DISPLAY OF TABS *SEE BACKSIDE NO PARKING ZONE PKG SPACE MARKINGS RED CURB WHEELS TURNED/HILL NO PKG THU 8AM-11AM NO PKG TUES 8AM-10AM 2923 2017 1948 1504 829 624 501 420 322 314 313 298 276 252 238 199 Citation Issuance Location 0K 1K 2K 3K HERMOSA AVE PIER AVE LOT A LOT C (STRUCTURE C) MANHATTAN AVE 11TH ST MONTEREY BLVD LOT B VALLEY DR 10TH ST 14TH ST 6TH ST LONGFELLOW AVE 8TH ST LOT D 2ND ST 3409 1396 1374 875 794 554 497 419 402 398 204 192 161 160 155 154 Total Citations Issued 14,690 Total Citations Issued - Trendline 3K 4K Previous Year Comparison 0K 50K14,690 Page 999 of 1002 Power BI Desktop 4/1/2026 4/30/2026 Parking Citation Locations Citations Issued 3,589 Total Citations Issued 0K 2K 4K April 2026 3,589 Citation Violation Description 0 500 DISPLAY OF PLATES *SEE BACKSIDE EXPIRED METER SPACE POSTED NO PARKING EXPIRED METER TIME LIMIT 1 HOUR EXP METER YL POST NO PKG WED 8AM-11AM DISPLAY OF TABS *SEE BACKSIDE NO PKG MON 8AM-11AM NO PKG THU 8AM-11AM NO PKG TUES 8AM-11AM PKG SPACE MARKINGS NO PKG WED 8AM-10AM RED CURB NO PARKING ZONE NO PKG MON 8AM -10AM NO PKG TUES 8AM-10AM WHEELS TURNED/HILL 680 540 480 419 162 146 137 104 101 73 62 61 59 53 50 49 46 45 Violation Description All Violation Code All Citation Violation Description © 2026 TomTom, © 2026 Microsoft Corporation© 2026 TomTom, © 2026 Microsoft CorporationPage 1000 of 1002 Power BI Desktop Year 2026 2026 Parking Citation Fine Revenue Total Citation Fine Amounts $0K $50K $100K $150K $200K January February March April 2026 $202,513$208,270 $184,652 $220,925 $196,204 Total Citations Issued 14,690 Total Fine Amount $810,051 Total Citations Issued 0K 2K 4K Jan 2026 Feb 2026 Mar 2026 Apr 2026 3669 351639423301 66 736162 Citation Warning Total Citations Issued by Weekday 0K 2K 1 Monday 2 Tuesday 3 Wednesday 4 Thursday 5 Friday 6 Saturday 7 Sunday 2461 2237 2171 1864 1826 2020 2111 Violation Description All Violation Code All Page 1001 of 1002 Power BI Desktop 1/1/2026 4/30/2026 Parking Permit Issuance fffffTotal Permits Issued 0K 1K 2K January February March April 2026 98 2582 2291 700 Total Citations Issued by Permit Type 0K 2K Vehicle Sticker 2026 2026 Guest Permit 2026 2026 Employee Permit Q2 April-June 2026 Employee Permit Q1 January-March 2026 Vehicle Sticker 2026 Guest Permit 2026 2818 2590 141 99 14 9 Monthly Permits Issued by Type 0K 1K 2K January February March April 2026 98 2,582 2,291 700 1228 1059 303 1337 1186 295 Employee Permit Q1 Janu… Employee Permit Q2 April-… Guest Permit 2026 Guest Permit 2026 2026 Vehicle Sticker 2026 Vehicle Sticker 2026 2026 Total Permits Issued 5,671 Revenue Collected $334,612 Breakdown of Permit Issuance Type 99 (1.75%) 2590 (45.67%) 14 (0.25%) 2818 (49.69%) Employee Permit Q1 Janu… Employee Permit Q2 April-… Guest Permit 2026 Guest Permit 2026 2026 Vehicle Sticker 2026 Vehicle Sticker 2026 2026 Page 1002 of 1002