Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-05-26 | Regular Meeting CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Post-Meeting Agenda Tuesday, May 26, 2026 Open Session at 6:00 PM Council Chambers 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 CITY COUNCIL Mike Detoy, Mayor Michael D. Keegan, Mayor Pro Tem Ray Jackson, Councilmember Dean Francois, Councilmember Rob Saemann, Councilmember David Pedersen, City Treasurer APPOINTED OFFICIALS Steve Napolitano, City Manager Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney EXECUTIVE TEAM Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Martha Alvarez, City Clerk Alison Becker, Community Development Director Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director Landon Phillips, Police Chief Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 - To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices (ALD) are available for check out at the meeting. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, you must call or submit your request in writing to the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0204 or at cityclerk@hermosabeach.gov at least 48 hours before the meeting. PARTICIPATION AND VIEWING OPTIONS Hermosa Beach City Council meetings are open to the public and are being held in person in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. Public comment is only guaranteed to be taken in person at City Hall during the meeting or prior to the meeting by submitting an eComment for an item on the agenda. As a courtesy only, the public may view and participate via the following: Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89968207828? pwd=bXZmWS83dmxHWDZLbWRTK2RVaUxaUT092 • Phone: Toll Free: (833) 548 0276; Meeting ID: 899 6820 7828, then #; Passcode: 472825• eComment: On the HTML agenda, click an agenda item, then click on the blue “Leave comment” (on computer) / blue speech bubble (on phone/tablet) button to provide a comment for that item. Submit eComments no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time. • Supplemental Email: Submit a supplemental email for agenda items only to cityclerk@hermosabeach.gov. Supplemental emails should indicate the agenda item and meeting date in the subject line and must be received no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time. Emails received after the deadline but before the meeting ends will be posted to the agenda the next business day. Writings distributed to all, or majority of all, of the City Council after the agenda has been posted shall be available for inspection at the City Clerk's Office located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 during regular business hours. • The City will also plan to broadcast the meeting via the following listed mediums. Cable TV: Spectrum Channel 8 and Frontier Channel 31 in Hermosa Beach • YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofHermosaBeach90254 • Live Stream: www.hermosabeach.gov/agenda• Cablecast App: Available on supported devices and smart TVs• If you experience technical difficulties while viewing a meeting on any of our digital platforms, please try another viewing option. Page 2 of 1339 Pages 1.OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM 2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3.ROLL CALL 4.ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS 5.APPROVAL OF AGENDA This is the time for the City Council to discuss any changes to the order of agenda items. Recommended Action: A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to approve the agenda. 6.PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS 6.a RECOGNIZING HERMOSA BEACH CERTIFIED GREEN BUSINESSES 6.b PRESENTATION ON COMMUNITY OPINION SURVEY RESULTS 10 7.PUBLIC COMMENT 71 This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction and on items where public comment will not be taken (City Manager Reports, City Councilmember Comments, Consent Calendar items not pulled for separate discussion, and Future Agenda Items). If public comment is provided on a Public Hearing or Municipal Matter item, public comment on the same item will not be accepted when the item is heard at a later part of the meeting. The public is invited to attend and provide public comment. Public comments are limited to three minutes per speaker from those present in City Council Chambers and via the remote participation options listed on the agenda. This time allotment may be modified due to time constraints at the discretion of the Mayor or City Council. No action will be taken on matters raised during public comment, except that the Council may take action to schedule issues raised during public comment for a future agenda. Speakers with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are encouraged to submit those comments directly to the City Manager. Members of the public will have a future opportunity to speak on items pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion, Public Hearings, and Municipal Matters when those items are heard. 8.CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 9.UPDATES ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITIES This is the time for members of the City Council to report on their attendance at ad hoc subcommittees or standing committee meetings, conferences, or other official activities as City representatives. Page 3 of 1339 10.CONSENT CALENDAR The following matters will be acted upon collectively with a single motion and vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. Councilmembers may orally register a negative vote on any Consent Calendar item without pulling the item for separate consideration before the vote on the Consent Calendar. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember removes an item from the Consent Calendar, either under Approval of the Agenda or under this item before the vote on the Consent Calendar. Items removed for separate discussion will be provided a separate public comment period. Recommended Action: A motion was made by Councilmember Jackson, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to approve the Consent Calendar Agenda Item Nos. 10.a-10.h, with the exception of Agenda Item No. 10.g, being removed for individual consideration. 10.a WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived. 10.b CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 85 (City Clerk Martha Alvarez) Recommended Action: To approve the minutes from the May 12, 2026, Regular Meeting. 10.c CHECK REGISTERS - 26-AS-058 100 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for May 7, 2026, through May 13, 2026. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands. 10.d CASH BALANCE REPORT - 26-AS-057 124 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the March 2026 Cash Balance Report. 10.e REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR MARCH 2026 - 26-AS-059 126 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the March 2026 Financial Reports. Page 4 of 1339 10.f CITY TREASURER’S REPORT - 26-AS-056 463 (City Treasurer Dave Pedersen) Recommended Action: The City Treasurer recommends City Council receive and file the April 2026 City Treasurer’s Report. 10.g CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF MAY 14, 2026 - 26-PW-035 465 (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Recommended Action: A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to approve the Capital Improvement Program State Report of May 14, 2026. 10.h AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE COMPLETION OF CIP 619 KELLY COURTS IMPROVEMENTS TO GR PAVING SOLUTIONS - 26-PW-026 474 CEQA: The Project is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and section 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction). The proposed work is an alteration of existing public structures or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing use. Further the proposed work consists of reconstruction of existing court structures where the new courts will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. No exceptions to the CEQA exemption apply. (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Page 5 of 1339 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: Award a construction contract for the completion of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project 619–Kelly Courts Improvements to GR Paving Solutions in the amount of $106,650.00 (Attachment 1); 1. Authorize the Director of Public Works to establish a contract contingency in the amount of $26,663 and to approve contract change orders up to the amount of the approved project contingency; 2. Adopt the attached resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach Approving the Construction of CIP 619 Kelly Courts Improvements Project Pursuant to Government Code Section 830.6 and Establishing a Project Payment Account” (Attachment 2); 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the construction contract, approve minor modifications as necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk to attesting the agreements, subject to approval by the City Attorney; and 4. Authorize the Director of Public Works to file a Notice of Completion following final completion of the project. 5. 11.PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M 11.a ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE - 26-CDD-045 598 CEQA: Determine the ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. (Community Development Director Alison Becker) Recommended Action: A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, to amend Section 17.03.100 to change the word "excluding" to "including" with respect to late night establishments and outdoor uses. Recommended Action: Councilmember Francois made a substitute motion to remove the phrase "excluding late night establishments and outdoor uses" completely from Section 17.03.100, motion failed for lack of a second. 11.b ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION AMENDING SECTION 3.12 PURCHASING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Continued from the meeting of April 28, 2026 Page 6 of 1339 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council continue the Public Hearing to a future City Council Meeting. 12.MUNICIPAL MATTERS 12.a FY 2026-2027 BUDGET PRESENTATIONS - 26-AS-061 849 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Councilmember Jackson, to receive and file the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget presentations. 12.b CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL EVENT POLICY GUIDE AND FEE UPDATES - 26-PR-027 878 (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: Consider approval of the proposed Special Event Policy Guide and fee updates outlined in the staff report; and 1. Consider the amendments proposed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission outlined in the staff report. 2. 12.c ENDORSEMENT OF ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES, INC’S (DBA ATHENS SERVICES) REQUEST FOR AN ANNUAL RATE ADJUSTMENT TO THE MAXIMUM RATES FOR SOLID WASTE SERVICES - 26-CMO-033 927 (Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss) Recommended Action: A motion was made by Councilmember Jackson, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, to endorse the proposed annual rate adjustment and adopt the accompanying resolution approving the maximum rates for solid waste services pursuant to the Integrated Solid Waste Management Services Agreement with Arakelian Enterprises, Inc. (DBA Athens Services), effective July 1, 2026. 12.d AWARD OF CONTRACT TO MOFFAT & NICHOL FOR PREPARATION OF A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PLAN. - 26-CMO-032 955 (Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss) Recommended Action: A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Councilember Jackson, to award a contract to Moffat & Nichol for preparation of a vulnerability assessment and sea level rise adaptation plan. Page 7 of 1339 12.e AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PROJECT ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY YARD PROJECT - 26-PW-025 1089 (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Recommended Action: A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Councilmember Saemann, to award a Professional Services Agreement for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) project analysis and other environmental services for the City Yard Project at a not-to-exceed amount of $498,800, authorize the City Manager to establish a project contingency of $75,000, and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. 12.f ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE ENGINEER’S REPORT AND SETTING JUNE 23, 2026 FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESMENTS WITHIN THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT DURING FY 2026–2027 - 26-PW-032 1271 CEQA: Determine that adopting resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15378, 15061(b)(3), 15301(h), and 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines. (Public Works Director Joe Sanclemente) Recommended Action: A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to adopt Resolution No. ***, approving the Engineer’s Report and setting June 23, 2026, for a Public Hearing for the Annual Levy of Assessments within the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District During Fiscal Year 2026-2027, as amended. 12.g LETTER OF OPPOSITION FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 1383: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT BENEFITS - 26-CMO-035 1306 (Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo) Recommended Action: A motion was made by Councilmember Francois, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, to direct staff to submit a letter of opposition to Assembly Bill 1383. 13.FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS This is the time for Councilmembers to schedule future agenda items and to ask questions about the status of previously approved future agenda items. No discussion, debate, or public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The tentative future agenda items document is provided for information only. Page 8 of 1339 13.a TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 26-CMO-034 1316 Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information. 14.CITY MANAGER REPORT 15.INFORMATIONAL ITEMS This is reserved for items that do not require City Council action. The City Council may request a future agenda item to discuss an informational item. Otherwise, discussion of informational items will not be taken. 15.a ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 18, 2026 1328 (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) 15.b POLICE CRIME STATISTICS FOR APRIL 2026 1336 (Police Chief Landon Philips) 16.ADJOURNMENT Page 9 of 1339 Page 10 of 1339 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 11 of 1339 Table of ContentsiCity of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T ABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii List of Figures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iii Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Motivation for Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Overview of Methodology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Organization of Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Disclaimer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 About True North. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Key Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Quality of Life & City Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Quality of Life. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Question 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Changes to Improve Hermosa Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Question 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Overall Performance Rating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Question 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Initial Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Question 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Support by Subgroups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Reasons For Not Supporting Measure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Question 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Projects & Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Question 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Service Ratings by Initial Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Positive Arguments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Question 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Top Positive Arguments by Initial Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Interim Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Question 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Support by Subgroups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Negative Arguments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Question 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Top Negative Arguments by Initial Support. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Final Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Question 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Change in Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Final Ballot Test at Lower Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Question 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Background & Demographics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Questionnaire Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Programming & Pre-Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Sample. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Statistical Margin of Error. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Recruiting & Data Collection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Data Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Rounding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Questionnaires & Toplines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Page 12 of 1339 List of TablesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 iiCity of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L IST OF TABLES Table 1 Demographic Breakdown of Support at Initial Ballot Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Table 2 Top Projects & Services by Position at Initial Ballot Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Table 3 Top Positive Arguments by Position at Initial Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Table 4 Demographic Breakdown of Support at Interim Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Table 5 Negative Arguments by Position at Initial Ballot Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Table 6 Demographic Breakdown of Support at Final Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Table 7 Movement Between Initial & Final Ballot Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Table 8 Demographics of Sample . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Page 13 of 1339 List of FiguresTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 iiiCity of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L IST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Quality of Life. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Figure 2 Quality of Life by Years in Hermosa Beach, Child in Hsld & Homeowner on Voter File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Figure 3 Quality of Life by Age & Gender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Figure 4 Changes to Improve City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Figure 5 Satisfaction With City Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Figure 6 Satisfaction With City Services by Years in Hermosa Beach, Quality of Life & Child in Hsld. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Figure 7 Satisfaction With City Services by Age, Homeowner on Voter File & Gender . . . . . . 10 Figure 8 Initial Ballot Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 Figure 9 Reasons for not Supporting Measure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Figure 10 Projects & Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Figure 11 Positive Arguments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Figure 12 Interim Ballot Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Figure 13 Negative Arguments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Figure 14 Final Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 Figure 15 Final Ballot Test Lower Amount. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Figure 16 Maximum Margin of Error Due to Sampling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Page 14 of 1339 IntroductionTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 1City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I NTRODUCTION Located in coastal Los Angeles County, the City of Hermosa Beach is currently home to an esti- mated 19,063 residents.1 Incorporated in 1907 and operating as a general law city under a Council-Manager form of government, the City’s team of full-time and part-time employees pro- vides a full suite of services through a variety of departments and divisions, including Adminis- trative Services, City Attorney, City Clerk, City Manager, Community Development, Finance, Human Resources, Parks & Recreation, Police, Public Works, and Fire and EMS.2 As Hermosa Beach has grown, so too have the demands placed upon its facilities, infrastructure, and services. Unfortunately, the City’s revenue streams have not kept pace with the growing demands and escalating costs, leading to shortfalls in the funding required to adequately address its various infrastructure systems—including streets and roads, sewer and storm drains, parks, and community facilities—as well as municipal services. In total, the City has an estimated $220 million in needed street and infrastructure projects for which it does not have a funding source, as well as projected structural deficits in the revenues needed to sustain city services at their current levels. MOTIVATION FOR RESEARCH The primary purpose of this study was to produce an unbiased, statistically reliable evaluation of voters' interest in supporting a local sales tax mea- sure to fund city streets, infrastructure, public safety, and other general municipal services. Additionally, should the City decide to move forward with a measure, the survey data can guide how best to structure the measure so it is consistent with the community's priorities and expressed needs. Specifically, the study was designed to: • Gauge current, baseline support for enacting a local sales tax to ensure adequate funding for streets, infrastructure, public safety, and general municipal services; • Identify the types of services voters are most interested in funding, should the measure pass; • Expose voters to arguments in favor of—and against—the proposed tax measure to gauge how information affects support for the measure; and • Estimate support for the measure once voters are presented with the types of information they will likely be exposed to during an election cycle. It is important to recognize that voters’ opinions about tax measures are often fluid, particularly when they begin with limited information. The way voters think and feel about a measure today may shift as they are exposed to additional details in the months leading up to election day. Accordingly, to accurately assess the feasibility of establishing a sales tax increase to fund municipal services, it was important that in addition to measuring current opinions about the measure (Question 5), the survey expose respondents to the types of information voters are likely to encounter during an election cycle, including arguments in favor of (Question 8) and opposed to (Question 10) the measure, and gauge how this type of information ultimately impacts their voting decision (Questions 9 & 11). 1. US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2024 5-Year Estimate. 2. Fire and emergency medical services (EMS) are provided by contract with the Los Angeles County Fire Depart- ment. Page 15 of 1339 IntroductionTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 2City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY For a full discussion of the research methods and tech- niques used in this study, turn to Methodology on page 28. In brief, the survey was administered to a random sample of 519 voters in the City of Hermosa Beach who are likely to participate in the November 2026 general election, with a subset who are also likely to participate in the lower- turnout June 2026 primary. The survey followed a mixed-method design that employed multiple recruiting methods (email, text, and telephone) and multiple data collection methods (telephone and online). Administered between April 16 and April 23, 2026, the average interview lasted 16 minutes. ORGANIZATION OF REPORT This report is designed to meet the needs of readers who prefer a summary of the findings as well as those who are interested in the details of the results. For those who seek an overview of the findings, the section titled Key Findings is for you. It pro- vides a summary of the most important findings of the survey and a discussion of their implica- tions. For the interested reader, this section is followed by a more detailed question-by-question discussion of the results from the survey by topic area (see Table of Contents), as well as a description of the methodology employed for collecting and analyzing the data. And, for the truly ambitious reader, the questionnaire used for the interviews is contained at the back of this report (see Questionnaires & Toplines on page 31) and a complete set of crosstabulations for the survey results is contained in Appendix A. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS True North thanks the City of Hermosa Beach for the opportunity to assist the City in this important effort. The collective expertise, local knowledge, and insight pro- vided by city staff and representatives improved the overall quality of the research presented here. DISCLAIMER The statements and conclusions in this report are those of the authors (Dr. Timothy McLarney and Richard Sarles) at True North Research, Inc. and not necessarily those of the City of Hermosa Beach. Any errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. ABOUT TRUE NORTH True North is a full-service survey research firm that is dedicated to providing public and private agencies with a clear understanding of the values, opinions, priori- ties, and concerns of their residents, voters, and customers. Through designing and implement- ing scientific surveys, focus groups, and one-on-one interviews as well as expert interpretation of the findings, True North helps its clients to move with confidence when making strategic deci- sions in a variety of areas—such as planning, policy evaluation, performance management, establishing fiscal priorities, passing revenue measures, and developing effective public informa- tion campaigns. During their careers, Dr. McLarney and Mr. Sarles have designed and conducted over 1,500 sur- vey research studies for public agencies, including more than 500 revenue measure feasibility studies. Of the measures that have gone to ballot based on Dr. McLarney’s recommendation, 93% have been successful. In total, the research that Dr. McLarney has conducted has led to over $42 billion in voter-approved local revenue measures. Page 16 of 1339 Key FindingsTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 3City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K EY FINDINGS As noted in the Introduction, this study was designed to provide the City of Hermosa Beach with a statistically reliable understanding of voters’ interest in establishing a local sales tax to fund general city services. Whereas subsequent sections of this report are devoted to conveying the detailed results of the survey, in this section we attempt to ‘see the forest through the trees’ and note how the collective results of the survey answer some of the key questions that motivated the research. The following conclusions are based on True North’s interpretations of the survey results and the firm’s collective experience conducting revenue measure studies for public agen- cies throughout the State. Is it feasible to place a local sales tax measure on the November 2026 ballot? Hermosa Beach voters have a high opinion of the quality of life in the community, and they value the services they receive from the City. These sentiments translate into sufficient natural support (56%) for establish- ing a one percent sales tax to fund city services, such as paving streets and fixing potholes, repairing aging infrastructure, keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained, fire protection, paramedic, and 911 emergency response, and police and crime prevention. The results of this baseline survey indicate that a local sales tax measure is likely feasible for the November 2026 ballot provided that it focuses on the projects and services that voters identify as their priorities and is accompanied by robust community/opinion leader engagement, educa- tion, and communication (more on this below). Having stated that a sales tax measure appears feasible, it is important to note that the measure’s prospects will be shaped by external factors (not within the City’s or an independent campaign’s control) and that a recommendation to place the measure on the November 2026 ballot comes with several qualifications and conditions. Indeed, although the results are promising, all revenue measures must overcome challenges prior to being successful. The proposed measure is no exception. The following paragraphs discuss some of the challenges and the next steps that True North recommends. Which services do vot- ers view as priorities? A general tax is “any tax imposed for general governmental purposes”3 and is distinguished from a special tax in that the funds raised by a gen- eral tax are not earmarked for any specific purpose(s). Thus, a general tax provides a municipality with a great deal of flexibility with respect to what is funded by the measure on a year-to-year basis. Although the Hermosa Beach City Council would have the discretion to decide how to spend the revenues, the survey results indicate that voters are primarily interested in using the proceeds to fund public works and 3. Section 1, Article XIIIC, California Constitution. Page 17 of 1339 Key FindingsTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 4City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . public safety, including keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained (91% strongly or somewhat favor), paving streets and fixing potholes (89%), maintaining city land- scaping and street trees (85%), repairing or replacing aging infrastruc- ture (84%), repairing and maintaining the sewer and stormdrain system (83%), and providing quick responses to 9-1-1 emergencies (82%). That said, it is worth noting that every potential use of sales tax proceeds tested was favored by at least two-thirds of voters surveyed. How might a public information campaign affect support for the proposed measure? As noted in the body of this report, individuals’ opinions about revenue measures are often not rigid, especially when the amount of information presented to the public on a measure has been limited. Thus, in addition to measuring current support for the measure, one of the goals of this study was to explore how the introduction of additional information about the measure may affect voters’ opinions about the proposal. It is clear from the survey results that some voters’ opinions about the proposed measure are somewhat sensitive to the nature—and amount— of information that they have about the measure. Information about the specific services that could be funded by the sales tax, as well as argu- ments in favor of the measure, were found by many voters to be compel- ling reasons to support the measure—boosting support to 62% at the Interim Ballot Test. However, voters also exhibited sensitivity to opposi- tion arguments, which effectively cooled support for the one percent sales tax measure down to 55% at the Final Ballot Test. There is also a risk that some voters could be swayed by hyper-partisan campaigning during the 2026 election cycle. Accordingly, one of the keys to building and sustaining support for the measure will be the presence of an effec- tive, well-organized public outreach effort, as well as an independent campaign that focuses on the need for the measure as well as the many benefits that it will bring. How might changes to the economic or politi- cal climate alter support for the measure? A survey is a snapshot in time—which means the results of this study and the conclusions noted above must be viewed in light of the current economic and political climates. On the one hand, this should provide some reassurances to the reader that the proposed sales tax measure is likely feasible for 2026. Even in a national environment marred by eco- nomic uncertainty, political instability, concerns about tariffs and infla- tion, rising cost-of-living pressures, and broader skepticism about government spending, 56% of voters were supportive of the proposed measure on the natural. On the other hand, the months leading up to the November 2026 elec- tion are likely to be punctuated with significant events on the economic and political fronts, both domestically and internationally. Exactly how these events unfold and may shape voters’ opinions remains to be seen. Should the economy and/or political climate improve, support for the Page 18 of 1339 Key FindingsTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 5City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . measure could increase. Conversely, negative economic and/or political developments (including escalation of the war in Iran, sustained high fuel prices, local opposition, and devolving into a hyper-partisan environ- ment), skewed voter turnout, and/or competing measures could dampen support for the measure below what was recorded in this study. Page 19 of 1339 Quality of Life & City ServicesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 6City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q UALITY OF LIFE & CITY SERVICES The opening section of the survey was designed to gauge voters’ opinions regarding the quality of life in Hermosa Beach, their ideas for how it can be improved, as well as their assessment of the City’s performance in providing municipal services. QUALITY OF LIFE At the outset of the interview, voters were asked to rate the quality of life in the City of Hermosa Beach using a five-point scale of excellent, good, fair, poor, or very poor. As shown in Figure 1 below, more than nine-in-ten voters surveyed shared favorable opinions of the quality of life in Hermosa Beach, with 49% reporting it is excellent and 45% stating it is good. Approximately 5% of voters surveyed rated the quality of life in the city as fair, whereas less than 1% used poor or very poor to describe the quality of life in Hermosa Beach. Question 2 How would you rate the overall quality of life in Hermosa Beach? Would you say it is excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? FIGURE 1 QUALITY OF LIFE Figures 2 and 3 show how ratings of the quality of life in the City of Hermosa Beach varied by length of residence, presence of a child in the household, homeownership status, age of the respondent, and gender. Although ratings varied slightly across subgroups, the most striking pat- tern in the figures is the consistency of opinion, as more than nine-in-ten respondents in every subgroup rated the quality of life in the city as excellent or good. FIGURE 2 QUALITY OF LIFE BY YEARS IN HERMOSA BEACH, CHILD IN HSLD & HOMEOWNER ON VOTER FILE Not sure 0.1 Very poor 0.6Poor 0.3 Fair 5.2 Good 45.0 Excellent 48.7 48.4 50.1 51.7 45.2 44.1 43.5 46.8 45.3Excellent 46.8 52.8 45.9 49.1 Good 48.5 45.047.638.8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Less than 5 5 to 9 10 to 14 15 or more Yes No Yes No Years in Hermosa Beach (Q1) Child in Hsld (Q14) Homeowner on Voter File% RespondentsPage 20 of 1339 Quality of Life & City ServicesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 7City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FIGURE 3 QUALITY OF LIFE BY AGE & GENDER CHANGES TO IMPROVE HERMOSA BEACH The next question in this series asked vot- ers to indicate the one thing that city government could change to make Hermosa Beach a better place to live, now and in the future. Question 3 was posed in an open-ended manner, allowing respondents to mention any aspect or attribute that came to mind without being prompted by or restricted to a particular list of options. True North later reviewed the verbatim responses and grouped them into the categories shown in Figure 4 on the next page. Among the specific changes desired, addressing parking issues (11%) and E-bike issues (11%) were the most common, followed by cleaning up/beautifying the city (7%), addressing homeless issues (6%), limiting growth and development (5%), and supporting local businesses (5%). An additional 15% of respondents could not think of a specific change they would like to see or stated flatly that no changes are needed—everything is fine. 44.5 49.1 49.5 49.3 44.9 44.0 45.250.148.4 Excellent 63.5 47.7 44.1 45.1 Good 34.7 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 18 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65 or older Male Female Age Gender% RespondentsPage 21 of 1339 Quality of Life & City ServicesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 8City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Question 3 If the city government could change one thing to make Hermosa Beach a better place to live now and in the future, what change would you like to see? FIGURE 4 CHANGES TO IMPROVE CITY OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING The final question in this series asked respondents to indicate if, overall, they were satisfied or dissatisfied with the job the City of Hermosa Beach is doing to provide city services. Because this question does not reference a specific program, facil- ity, or service and requested that the respondent consider the City’s performance in general, the findings of this question may be regarded as an overall performance rating for the City. As shown in Figure 5 on the next page, approximately eight-in-ten voters surveyed indicated that they were satisfied with the City of Hermosa Beach’s efforts to provide municipal services, with 31% saying they were very satisfied and 48% somewhat satisfied. Sixteen percent (16%) reported that they were dissatisfied with the City’s overall performance, whereas 5% were unsure or unwilling to state their opinion. For the interested reader, figures 6 and 7 display how the percentage of respondents satisfied with the City’s overall performance varied across demographic subgroups. When compared to their respective counterparts, newer residents (less than 5 years), younger residents (under 30), and those who rated the overall quality of life in the city as excellent or good were the most likely to report being satisfied with the City’s overall performance in providing services. 11.3 11.1 10.2 7.1 6.0 5.3 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.3 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.8 3.9 4.5 2.1 0 5 10 15 Address parking issues Address E-bike issues Not sure / Cannot think of anything specific Clean up, beautify City Address homeless issues Limit growth, development No changes needed / Everything is fine Support small, local businesses Enforce traffic laws Improve fiscal management, budgeting Provide more bike lane connections, separate from walking paths Enforce city codes Put utilities underground Provide a community pool Provide a dog park, dog beach Improve infrastructure, streets, roads Improve public safety Fix, improve the pier Provide more police presence, response Improve parks, rec facilities Enforce noise ordinance Provide rec activities, events for all ages Do not allow dogs on beach Provide more affordable housing Reduce taxes, fees Fix, upgrade rundown, empty buildings Reduce traffic congestion Improve pedestrian safety, crossings Reduce building permit restrictions Improve City Council, Gov process Improve shopping, dining opportunities Address rent control issue Improve public transportation % Respondents Page 22 of 1339 Quality of Life & City ServicesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 9City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Question 4 Generally speaking, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the job the City of Her- mosa Beach is doing to provide city services? FIGURE 5 SATISFACTION WITH CITY SERVICES FIGURE 6 SATISFACTION WITH CITY SERVICES BY YEARS IN HERMOSA BEACH, QUALITY OF LIFE & CHILD IN HSLD Very satisfied 31.1 Somewhat satisfied 48.2 Somewhat dissatisfied 12.1 Very dissatisfied 4.0 Not sure 4.1 Prefer not to answer 0.5 33.0 2.7 26.2 50.2 18.0 50.2 47.9 27.933.829.0 Very satisfied 41.3 33.0 47.8 42.1 50.4 Smwt satisfied 47.3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Less than 5 5 to 9 10 to 14 15 or more Excellent, good Fair, poor, very poor Yes No Years in Hermosa Beach (Q1) Quality of Life (Q2) Child in Hsld (Q14)% RespondentsPage 23 of 1339 Quality of Life & City ServicesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 10City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FIGURE 7 SATISFACTION WITH CITY SERVICES BY AGE, HOMEOWNER ON VOTER FILE & GENDER 35.9 31.9 30.2 30.4 42.0 49.3 46.9 51.3 45.4 32.8 Very satisfied 48.3 26.8 36.6 18.6 Smwt satisfied 43.3 55.4 43.8 53.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 18 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65 or older Yes No Male Female Age Homeowner on Voter File Gender% RespondentsPage 24 of 1339 Initial Ballot TestTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 11City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I NITIAL BALLOT TEST The primary research objective of this survey was to estimate voters’ support for establishing a one percent sales tax to provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as paving streets and fixing potholes, repairing aging infrastructure, keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained, fire protection, paramedic, and 911 emer- gency response, and police and crime prevention. To this end, Question 5 was designed to take an early assessment of voters’ support for the proposed measure. The motivation for placing Question 5 near the front of the survey is twofold. First, voter support for a measure can often depend on the amount of information they have about a measure. At this point in the survey, the respondent has not been provided information about the proposed measure beyond what is presented in the ballot language. This situation is analogous to a voter casting a ballot with limited knowledge about the measure, such as what might occur in the absence of an effective campaign. Question 5, also known as the Initial Ballot Test, is thus a good measure of voter support for the proposed measure as it is today, on the natural. Because the Initial Ballot Test provides a gauge of natural support for the measure, it also serves a second purpose as a useful baseline from which to judge the impact of various information items con- veyed later in the survey on voter support for the measure. Question 5 Later this year, voters in Hermosa Beach may be asked to vote on a local ballot measure. Let me read you a summary of the measure. To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as paving streets and fixing potholes; repairing aging infrastructure; keep- ing streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained; fire protec- tion, paramedic, and 911 emergency response; police and crime prevention; shall City of Hermosa Beach's ordinance establishing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? FIGURE 8 INITIAL BALLOT TEST Figure 8 presents the results of the Initial Ballot Test among all respondents. Overall, 56% of likely November 2026 voters sur- veyed indicated that they would support the proposed one percent sales tax, whereas 35% stated that they would oppose the mea- sure and approximately 10% were unsure or unwilling to share their vote choice. For gen- eral taxes in California, the level of support recorded at the Initial Ballot Test is approxi- mately six percentage points above the sim- ple majority (50%+1) required for passage. Prefer not to answer 0.3Not sure 9.3 Definitely no 18.0 Probably no 16.5 Probably yes 29.0 Definitely yes 27.0 Page 25 of 1339 Initial Ballot TestTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 12City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SUPPORT BY SUBGROUPS For the interested reader, Table 1 shows how support for the measure at the Initial Ballot Test varied by key demographic traits. The blue column (Approxi- mate % of Universe) indicates the percentage of the likely November 2026 electorate that each subgroup category comprises. Support for the proposed measure was widespread, with nearly all demographic subgroups exhibiting support at or above a simple majority. TABLE 1 DEMOGRAPHIC BREAKDOWN OF SUPPORT AT INITIAL BALLOT TEST Approximate % of Voter Universe % Probably or Definitely Yes % Not sure Overall 100.0 56.0 9.3 Less than 5 15.7 62.5 10.8 5 to 9 16.2 56.9 6.2 10 to 14 16.0 50.0 15.5 15 or more 52.0 55.5 7.8 Excellent, good 93.9 57.5 9.4 Fair, poor, very poor 6.1 31.6 6.5 Satisfied 83.1 61.4 9.3 Dissatisfied 16.9 29.5 10.4 Excellent, good 29.5 81.8 5.8 Fair 27.8 53.2 10.3 Poor, very poor 21.2 31.3 7.0 Not sure 21.5 48.9 15.4 18 to 29 13.0 72.1 6.9 30 to 39 15.3 49.6 15.3 40 to 49 17.6 57.2 9.3 50 to 64 29.5 54.3 7.3 65 or older 24.6 52.6 9.1 Democrat 46.7 62.4 8.8 Republican 22.6 50.9 8.4 Other / DTS 30.7 49.9 10.5 Single dem 26.6 61.2 9.8 Dual dem 10.5 67.3 8.0 Single rep 12.4 49.4 9.1 Dual rep 4.7 57.0 0.0 Other 22.4 51.3 9.0 Mixed 23.4 52.6 11.4 Yes 26.9 52.9 11.0 No 73.1 57.9 8.4 Since June 2016 33.5 61.9 7.9 Before June 2016 66.5 53.0 9.9 Yes 53.8 55.5 9.7 No 46.2 56.5 8.7 Yes 76.9 58.3 8.3 No 23.1 48.3 12.5 Yes 58.4 53.1 10.4 No 41.6 60.0 7.7 Yes 41.1 51.4 11.5 No 58.9 59.1 7.7 Male 50.1 60.1 8.3 Female 49.9 55.4 10.0 Household Party Type Age Years in Hermosa Beach (Q1) Fiscal Management Rating (Q13) Party Quality of Life (Q2) Overall Satisfaction (Q4) Likely June 2026 Voter Likely Low Turnout Election Voter Gender Child in Hsld (Q14) Registration Year Homeowner on Voter File Likely to Vote by Mail Page 26 of 1339 Initial Ballot TestTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 13City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REASONS FOR NOT SUPPORTING MEASURE Respondents who did not support the measure or were unsure at the Initial Ballot Test were subsequently asked if there was a particu- lar reason for their position. Question 6 was asked in an open-ended manner, allowing respon- dents to mention any reason that came to mind without being prompted by or restricted to a particular list of options. True North later reviewed the verbatim responses and grouped them into the categories shown in Figure 9. Among the reasons offered for not supporting the measure, a perception that city funds have been/will be mismanaged or misspent was the most common (32%), followed by the belief that taxes are already too high (28%), a desire for more information about the measure (20%), and concerns about the economy, inflation, and cost of living (15%). Question 6 Is there a particular reason why you do not support or are unsure about the mea- sure I just described? FIGURE 9 REASONS FOR NOT SUPPORTING MEASURE 31.8 28.4 19.9 14.7 7.6 6.7 5.3 5.2 5.1 2.6 2.1 1.6 1.8 2.7 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Money is misspent, mismanaged Taxes already too high Need more information Economic, inflation, cost of living concerns Other ways to be funded It will hurt local economy Do not trust City City has enough money Not sure / No particular reason Lack of public oversight with general tax Money will go to employee salaries, pensions City services are okay as-is, no need for more money Other higher priorities in community Money should not go to law enforcement % Respondents Who Do Not Support Measure Page 27 of 1339 Projects & ServicesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 14City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P ROJECTS & SERVICES The ballot language presented in Question 5 indicated that the proposed sales tax measure would be used to provide funding for Hermosa Beach city services, such as paving streets and fixing potholes, repairing aging infrastructure, keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained, fire protection, paramedic, and 911 emergency response, and police and crime prevention. The purpose of Question 7 was to provide respon- dents with a full range of projects and services that may be funded by the measure, and to iden- tify which of these projects voters most favored funding with sales tax proceeds. After reading each project or service that may be funded by the measure, respondents were asked if they would favor or oppose spending some of the money on that particular item assum- ing that the measure passes. Descriptions of the projects tested, as well as voters’ responses, are shown in Figure 10 below.4 Question 7 The measure we've been discussing will provide funding for a variety of services in your community. If the measure passes, would you favor or oppose using some of the money to: _____, or do you not have an opinion? FIGURE 10 PROJECTS & SERVICES All projects and services tested were popular with Hermosa Beach voters, with more than two- thirds of respondents indicating they would favor spending measure proceeds on each of the 12 items tested. That said, the services that resonated with the largest percentage of respondents keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained (91% strongly or somewhat favor), paving streets and fixing potholes (89%), maintaining city landscap- 4. For the full text of the services tested, turn to Question 7 in Questionnaires & Toplines on page 31. 65.6 55.9 43.9 46.0 48.2 56.9 54.4 54.6 47.1 44.6 40.4 30.1 25.0 33.0 41.2 38.1 35.0 25.5 26.1 22.8 27.1 27.5 31.7 37.9 0 102030405060708090100 Keep streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained Pave streets and fix potholes Maintain city landscaping and street trees Repair or replace aging infrastructure Repair and maintain the sewer and stormdrain system Provide quick responses to 911 emergencies Provide fire protection and paramedic services Provide e-Bike enforcement Provide police and crime prevention services Address homelessness Remove graffiti Provide recreation programs for all agesQ7cQ7aQ7lQ7bQ7kQ7eQ7dQ7hQ7fQ7gQ7iQ7j % Respondents Strongly favor Somewhat favor Page 28 of 1339 Projects & ServicesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 15City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ing and street trees (85%), repairing or replacing aging infrastructure (84%), repairing and main- taining the sewer and stormdrain system (83%), and providing quick responses to 9-1-1 emergencies (82%). SERVICE RATINGS BY INITIAL SUPPORT Table 2 presents the top five services (based on the percentage of respondents who strongly favor each) by position at the Initial Ballot Test. Not surprisingly, individuals who initially opposed the measure were generally less likely to favor spending money on a given service when compared with supporters. Nevertheless, initial sup- porters, opponents, and the undecided did agree on three of the top five priorities for funding. TABLE 2 TOP PROJECTS & SERVICES BY POSITION AT INITIAL BALLOT TEST Position at Initial Ballot Test (Q5) Item Project/Service Summary % Strongly Favor Q7c Keep streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well- maintained 83 Q7e Provide quick responses to 911 emergencies 71 Q7d Provide fire protection and paramedic services 71 Q7a Pave streets and fix potholes 68 Q7b Repair or replace aging infrastructure 62 Q7h Provide e-Bike enforcement 46 Q7a Pave streets and fix potholes 38 Q7c Keep streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well- maintained 38 Q7e Provide quick responses to 911 emergencies 34 Q7k Repair and maintain the sewer and stormdrain system 32 Q7c Keep streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well- maintained 68 Q7e Provide quick responses to 911 emergencies 59 Q7a Pave streets and fix potholes 50 Q7f Provide police and crime prevention services 50 Q7d Provide fire protection and paramedic services 48 Probably or Definitely Yes (n = 290) Probably or Definitely No (n = 179) Not Sure (n = 48) Page 29 of 1339 Positive ArgumentsTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 16City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P OSITIVE ARGUMENTS If the City chooses to place a measure on an upcoming ballot, voters will be exposed to various arguments about the measure in the ensuing months. Proponents of the measure will present arguments to try to persuade voters to support a measure, just as opponents may present argu- ments to achieve the opposite goal. For this study to be a reliable gauge of voter support for the proposed sales tax measure, it is important that the survey simulate the type of discussion and debate that will occur prior to the vote taking place and identify how this information ultimately shapes voters’ opinions about the measure. The objective of Question 8 was thus to present respondents with arguments in favor of the pro- posed measure and identify whether they felt the arguments were convincing reasons to support it. Arguments in opposition to the measure were also presented and are discussed later in this report (see Negative Arguments on page 21). Within each series, specific arguments were admin- istered in random order to avoid a systematic position bias. Question 8 What I'd like to do now is tell you what some people are saying about the measure we've been discussing. Supporters of the measure say: _____. Do you think this is a very convinc- ing, somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to SUPPORT the measure? FIGURE 11 POSITIVE ARGUMENTS 39.3 30.5 32.8 32.7 32.3 32.0 29.1 27.2 22.9 35.5 43.5 39.9 35.9 36.0 35.0 33.9 34.8 32.0 0 102030405060708090100 All money raised by measure will stay local to fund essential services, facilities here in Hermosa Beach; by law, it can’t be taken away by State or County By keeping city safe, clean, well-maintained, measure will help protect quality of life, keep Hermosa Beach a special place to live City maintains 47 mi of streets, 70 mi of sidewalks, 112 acres of beaches, parks, playfields; measure provides funding we need to keep streets, infrastructure, parks in good condition Most of sales tax goes to State, County; measure ensures higher percentage of sales tax dollars stay here in Hermosa Beach, we have local control over how those funds are spent City has $220M+ in unfunded street, infrastructure projects that need to be completed; the longer we wait to fix streets, infrastructure, facilities, the more expensive it will become Fast response times for 911 calls critical for saving lives; measure will ensure that we have enough police officers, firefighters, paramedics to respond quickly to 911 emergencies Measure will cost just $1 for every $100 purchased; food, medicine, many other essential items are excluded from tax Measure includes a clear system of accountability incl citizen oversight, independent audits, public disclosure of how all funds are spent Measure makes good financial sense; most of money raised by sales tax comes from people who visit, pass through Hermosa Beach, but don’t live hereQ8bQ8cQ8eQ8dQ8hQ8fQ8iQ8aQ8g % Respondents Very convincing Somewhat convincing Page 30 of 1339 Positive ArgumentsTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 17City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 11 presents the truncated positive arguments tested, as well as voters’ reactions to the arguments. The arguments are sorted from most convincing to least convincing based on the percentage of respondents who indicated that the argument was either a ‘very convincing’ or ‘somewhat convincing’ reason to support the measure. Using this methodology, the most com- pelling positive arguments were: All money raised by the measure will stay local to fund essen- tial services and facilities here in Hermosa Beach. By law, it can't be taken away by the State or the County (75% very or somewhat convincing), By keeping our city safe, clean and well-main- tained, this measure will help protect our quality of life and keep Hermosa Beach a special place to live (74%), and The City maintains 47 miles of streets, 70 miles of sidewalks, and 112 acres of beaches, parks and playfields. This measure provides the funding we need to keep our streets, infrastructure, and parks in good condition (73%). TOP POSITIVE ARGUMENTS BY INITIAL SUPPORT Table 3 on the next page lists the top five most convincing positive arguments (based on the percentage of respondents who cited it as very convincing) according to respondents’ vote choice at the Initial Ballot Test. The most striking pattern in the table is that the positive arguments resonated with a much higher percentage of voters who were initially inclined to support the measure when compared to voters who initially opposed the measure or were unsure. Nevertheless, three specific arguments were ranked among the top five most compelling by supporters, opponents, and the undecided. Page 31 of 1339 Positive ArgumentsTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 18City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TABLE 3 TOP POSITIVE ARGUMENTS BY POSITION AT INITIAL BALLOT TEST Position at Initial Ballot Test (Q5) Item Positive Argument Summary % Very Convincing Q8b All money raised by measure will stay local to fund essential services, facilities here in Hermosa Beach; by law, it can’t be taken away by State or County 54 Q8e City maintains 47 mi of streets, 70 mi of sidewalks, 112 acres of beaches, parks, playfields; measure provides funding we need to keep streets, infrastructure, parks in good condition 49 Q8f Fast response times for 911 calls critical for saving lives; measure will ensure that we have enough police officers, firefighters, paramedics to respond quickly to 911 emergencies 49 Q8d Most of sales tax goes to State, County; measure ensures higher percentage of sales tax dollars stay here in Hermosa Beach, we have local control over how those funds are spent 49 Q8h City has $220M+ in unfunded street, infrastructure projects that need to be completed; the longer we wait to fix streets, infrastructure, facilities, the more expensive it will become 47 Q8b All money raised by measure will stay local to fund essential services, facilities here in Hermosa Beach; by law, it can’t be taken away by State or County 16 Q8c By keeping city safe, clean, well-maintained, measure will help protect quality of life, keep Hermosa Beach a special place to live 11 Q8h City has $220M+ in unfunded street, infrastructure projects that need to be completed; the longer we wait to fix streets, infrastructure, facilities, the more expensive it will become 11 Q8d Most of sales tax goes to State, County; measure ensures higher percentage of sales tax dollars stay here in Hermosa Beach, we have local control over how those funds are spent 11 Q8g Measure makes good financial sense; most of money raised by sales tax comes from people who visit, pass through Hermosa Beach, but don’t live here 10 Q8b All money raised by measure will stay local to fund essential services, facilities here in Hermosa Beach; by law, it can’t be taken away by State or County 32 Q8h City has $220M+ in unfunded street, infrastructure projects that need to be completed; the longer we wait to fix streets, infrastructure, facilities, the more expensive it will become 24 Q8e City maintains 47 mi of streets, 70 mi of sidewalks, 112 acres of beaches, parks, playfields; measure provides funding we need to keep streets, infrastructure, parks in good condition 21 Q8c By keeping city safe, clean, well-maintained, measure will help protect quality of life, keep Hermosa Beach a special place to live 20 Q8d Most of sales tax goes to State, County; measure ensures higher percentage of sales tax dollars stay here in Hermosa Beach, we have local control over how those funds are spent 19 Probably or Definitely Yes (n = 290) Probably or Definitely No (n = 179) Not Sure (n = 48) Page 32 of 1339 Interim Ballot TestTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 19City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I NTERIM BALLOT TEST After exposing respondents to projects and services that could be funded by the measure as well as the types of positive arguments voters may encounter during an election cycle, the survey again presented respondents with the ballot language used previously to gauge how support for the proposed sales tax measure may have changed. As shown in Figure 12, overall support among likely November 2026 voters increased to 62%, with 29% of voters indicating that they would definitely vote yes on the measure. Approximately 30% of respondents opposed the mea- sure at this point in the survey, and an additional 9% were unsure or unwilling to state their vote choice. Question 9 Sometimes people change their mind about a measure once they have more infor- mation about it. Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a sum- mary of it again. To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as paving streets and fixing potholes; repairing aging infrastructure; keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained; fire protection, paramedic, and 911 emergency response; police and crime prevention; shall City of Hermosa Beach's ordinance establishing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city ser- vices until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally con- trolled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? FIGURE 12 INTERIM BALLOT TEST SUPPORT BY SUBGROUPS Table 4 on the next page shows how support for the measure at this point in the survey varied by key voter subgroups, as well as the percentage change in subgroup support when compared with the Initial Ballot Test. Positive differences appear in green, whereas negative differences appear in red. Support for the proposed sales tax measure increased or decreased by moderate amounts (five percentage points or more) between the Ini- tial and Interim Ballot Tests for many subgroups, with the largest net changes in support exhib- ited by those who rated the City’s fiscal management as fair (+10%), voters under the age of 30 (+10%), those who have resided in Hermosa Beach less than five years (+9%), and voters age 40 to 49 (+8%). Definitely yes 29.3 Probably yes 32.2 Probably no 14.5 Definitely no 15.4 Not sure 8.2 Prefer not to answer 0.3 Page 33 of 1339 Interim Ballot TestTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 20City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TABLE 4 DEMOGRAPHIC BREAKDOWN OF SUPPORT AT INTERIM BALLOT TEST Approximate % of Voter Universe % Probably or Definitely Yes Change From Initial Ballot Test (Q5) Overall 100.0 61.6 +5.6 Less than 5 15.7 71.6 +9.1 5 to 9 16.2 62.2 +5.3 10 to 14 16.0 54.4 +4.5 15 or more 52.0 60.5 +5.0 Excellent, good 93.9 63.8 +6.3 Fair, poor, very poor 6.1 27.1 -4.6 Satisfied 83.1 68.3 +6.9 Dissatisfied 16.9 30.3 +0.8 Excellent, good 29.5 85.0 +3.1 Fair 27.8 63.6 +10.4 Poor, very poor 21.2 31.9 +0.6 Not sure 21.5 56.2 +7.2 18 to 29 13.0 81.7 +9.6 30 to 39 15.3 56.3 +6.7 40 to 49 17.6 65.1 +7.9 50 to 64 29.5 58.7 +4.4 65 or older 24.6 55.1 +2.5 Democrat 46.7 69.8 +7.4 Republican 22.6 53.4 +2.5 Other / DTS 30.7 55.1 +5.2 Single dem 26.6 68.6 +7.4 Dual dem 10.5 71.9 +4.6 Single rep 12.4 53.8 +4.4 Dual rep 4.7 57.0 No change Other 22.4 55.3 +3.9 Mixed 23.4 60.0 +7.4 Yes 26.9 59.6 +6.7 No 73.1 62.9 +5.1 Since June 2016 33.5 66.6 +4.7 Before June 2016 66.5 59.0 +6.0 Yes 53.8 60.0 +4.5 No 46.2 63.4 +6.9 Yes 76.9 63.5 +5.2 No 23.1 55.2 +6.9 Yes 58.4 57.6 +4.5 No 41.6 67.1 +7.1 Yes 41.1 55.4 +4.0 No 58.9 65.9 +6.8 Male 50.1 64.6 +4.6 Female 49.9 62.2 +6.8 Years in Hermosa Beach (Q1) Quality of Life (Q2) Overall Satisfaction (Q4) Fiscal Management Rating (Q13) Age Party Household Party Type Child in Hsld (Q14) Likely Low Turnout Election Voter Gender Registration Year Homeowner on Voter File Likely to Vote by Mail Likely June 2026 Voter Page 34 of 1339 Negative ArgumentsTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 21City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N EGATIVE ARGUMENTS Whereas Question 8 presented respondents with arguments in favor of the measure, Question 10 presented respondents with arguments designed to elicit opposition to the measure. In the case of Question 10, however, respondents were asked if they felt that the argument was a very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to oppose the measure. The arguments tested, as well as voters’ opinions about the arguments, are presented in Figure 13. Question 10 Next, let me tell you what opponents of the measure are saying. Opponents of the measure say: _____. Do you think this is a very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to OPPOSE the measure? FIGURE 13 NEGATIVE ARGUMENTS Among the negative arguments tested, the most compelling were: Residents and local businesses have been hit hard by inflation, high interest rates, and cost of living increases. Many are strug- gling to stay afloat. Now is not the time to raise taxes (73% very or somewhat convincing), Every- one is coming after us for tax increases - including state and county taxes, school bonds, and other taxes that will be on the ballot this year. Enough is enough. We can't afford to keep raising our taxes (70%), and There are no guarantees on how funds will be spent, which means the City can divert the money to pet projects without any say from voters. We can't trust the City with our tax dollars. They will mismanage the money (68%). TOP NEGATIVE ARGUMENTS BY INITIAL SUPPORT Table 5 on the next page ranks the top five negative arguments (based on % very convincing) according to respondents’ vote choice at the Initial Ballot Test. 37.9 35.7 31.7 31.3 33.2 34.8 34.7 36.0 31.1 27.2 0 102030405060708090100 Residents, local businesses have been hit hard by inflation, high interest rates, cost of living increases; many are struggling to stay afloat; now is not the time to raise taxes Everyone is coming after us for tax increases, incl state, county taxes, school bonds, other taxes that will be on ballot this yr; enough is enough; we can’t afford to keep raising taxes There are no guarantees on how funds will be spent, City can divert money to pet projects without any say from voters; we can’t trust City with tax dollars; they will mismanage money City tried to increase sales tax twice in recent yrs, twice voters said NO; rather than listening to voters, City is trying it a third time This tax will last forever. It will never expireQ10aQ10cQ10bQ10d2 Q10d1% Respondents Very convincing Somewhat convincing Page 35 of 1339 Negative ArgumentsTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 22City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TABLE 5 NEGATIVE ARGUMENTS BY POSITION AT INITIAL BALLOT TEST Position at Initial Ballot Test (Q5) Item Negative Argument Summary % Very Convincing Q10a Residents, local businesses have been hit hard by inflation, high interest rates, cost of living increases; many are struggling to stay afloat; now is not the time to raise taxes 25 Q10d1 This tax will last forever. It will never expire 23 Q10b There are no guarantees on how funds will be spent, City can divert money to pet projects without any say from voters; we can’t trust City with tax dollars; they will mismanage money 21 Q10c Everyone is coming after us for tax increases, incl state, county taxes, school bonds, other taxes that will be on ballot this yr; enough is enough; we can’t afford to keep raising taxes 20 Q10d2 City tried to increase sales tax twice in recent yrs, twice voters said NO; rather than listening to voters, City is trying it a third time 20 Q10a Residents, local businesses have been hit hard by inflation, high interest rates, cost of living increases; many are struggling to stay afloat; now is not the time to raise taxes 61 Q10c Everyone is coming after us for tax increases, incl state, county taxes, school bonds, other taxes that will be on ballot this yr; enough is enough; we can’t afford to keep raising taxes 60 Q10d2 City tried to increase sales tax twice in recent yrs, twice voters said NO; rather than listening to voters, City is trying it a third time 53 Q10d1 This tax will last forever. It will never expire 52 Q10b There are no guarantees on how funds will be spent, City can divert money to pet projects without any say from voters; we can’t trust City with tax dollars; they will mismanage money 47 Q10c Everyone is coming after us for tax increases, incl state, county taxes, school bonds, other taxes that will be on ballot this yr; enough is enough; we can’t afford to keep raising taxes 39 Q10d1 This tax will last forever. It will never expire 35 Q10a Residents, local businesses have been hit hard by inflation, high interest rates, cost of living increases; many are struggling to stay afloat; now is not the time to raise taxes 34 Q10b There are no guarantees on how funds will be spent, City can divert money to pet projects without any say from voters; we can’t trust City with tax dollars; they will mismanage money 34 Q10d2 City tried to increase sales tax twice in recent yrs, twice voters said NO; rather than listening to voters, City is trying it a third time 6 Probably or Definitely Yes (n = 290) Probably or Definitely No (n = 179) Not Sure (n = 48) Page 36 of 1339 Final Ballot TestTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 23City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F INAL BALLOT TEST Voters’ opinions about ballot measures are often not rigid, especially when the amount of infor- mation presented to the public on a measure has been limited. An important goal of the survey was thus to gauge how voters’ opinions about the proposed measure may be affected by the information they could encounter during the course of an election cycle. After providing respon- dents with the wording of the proposed measure, projects and services that could be funded, and arguments in favor of and against the proposal, the survey again asked voters whether they would vote ‘yes’ or ‘no’ on the proposed sales tax measure. Question 11 Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a sum- mary of it one more time. To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as paving streets and fixing potholes; repairing aging infrastructure; keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained; fire protection, paramedic, and 911 emer- gency response; police and crime prevention; shall City of Hermosa Beach's ordinance establish- ing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? FIGURE 14 FINAL BALLOT TEST At this point in the survey, support for the measure was found among 55% of likely November 2026 voters surveyed, with 27% indicating they would definitely support the measure. Approxi- mately 33% of respondents opposed the measure at the Final Ballot Test, and 12% were unsure or unwilling to state their vote choice. Prefer not to answer 1.2Not sure 10.8 Definitely no 16.8 Probably no 16.0 Probably yes 28.0 Definitely yes 27.1 Page 37 of 1339 Change in SupportTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 24City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C HANGE IN SUPPORT Table 6 provides a closer look at how support for the proposed measure changed over the course of the survey by calculating the difference in support between the Initial, Interim, and Final Ballot Tests within subgroups of voters. The percentage of support for the measure at the Final Ballot Test is shown in the column with the heading % Probably or Definitely Yes. The col- umns to the right show the difference between the Final and the Initial, and the Final and Interim Ballot Tests. Positive differences appear in green, and negative differences appear in red. TABLE 6 DEMOGRAPHIC BREAKDOWN OF SUPPORT AT FINAL BALLOT TEST As expected, voters generally responded to the negative arguments with a reduction in their sup- port for the sales tax measure when compared with the levels recorded at the Interim Ballot Test. The general trend over the course of the entire survey (Initial to Final Ballot Test) was one of sta- bility, averaging -0.8% across all subgroups. With this slight movement, support for the pro- Approximate % of Voter Universe % Probably or Definitely Yes Change From Initial Ballot Test (Q5) Change From Interim Ballot Test (Q9) Overall 100.0 55.2 -0.8 -6.4 Less than 5 15.7 63.1 +0.6 -8.5 5 to 9 16.2 57.5 +0.6 -4.7 10 to 14 16.0 47.8 -2.2 -6.6 15 or more 52.0 54.4 -1.0 -6.0 Excellent, good 93.9 57.8 +0.3 -6.0 Fair, poor, very poor 6.1 13.8 -17.9 -13.3 Satisfied 83.1 61.1 -0.2 -7.1 Dissatisfied 16.9 28.0 -1.4 -2.2 Excellent, good 29.5 81.7 -0.1 -3.3 Fair 27.8 53.2 -0.0 -10.5 Poor, very poor 21.2 28.5 -2.8 -3.5 Not sure 21.5 48.7 -0.3 -7.5 18 to 29 13.0 81.7 +9.6 No change 30 to 39 15.3 50.1 +0.5 -6.2 40 to 49 17.6 59.0 +1.8 -6.1 50 to 64 29.5 49.8 -4.5 -9.0 65 or older 24.6 48.1 -4.5 -7.0 Democrat 46.7 63.3 +0.9 -6.5 Republican 22.6 47.3 -3.6 -6.1 Other / DTS 30.7 48.6 -1.3 -6.4 Single dem 26.6 61.9 +0.7 -6.7 Dual dem 10.5 68.3 +1.0 -3.6 Single rep 12.4 46.2 -3.2 -7.6 Dual rep 4.7 53.8 -3.2 -3.2 Other 22.4 49.0 -2.3 -6.3 Mixed 23.4 52.6 -0.0 -7.5 Yes 26.9 54.2 +1.3 -5.4 No 73.1 56.6 -1.3 -6.3 Since June 2016 33.5 62.7 +0.9 -3.9 Before June 2016 66.5 51.4 -1.6 -7.7 Yes 53.8 53.1 -2.4 -6.9 No 46.2 57.6 +1.1 -5.8 Yes 76.9 57.2 -1.1 -6.3 No 23.1 48.4 +0.1 -6.7 Yes 58.4 50.4 -2.7 -7.2 No 41.6 61.9 +1.9 -5.2 Yes 41.1 48.2 -3.2 -7.2 No 58.9 60.0 +0.9 -5.8 Male 50.1 58.9 -1.1 -5.7 Female 49.9 54.2 -1.2 -7.9 Years in Hermosa Beach (Q1) Quality of Life (Q2) Overall Satisfaction (Q4) Fiscal Management Rating (Q13) Age Party Household Party Type Child in Hsld (Q14) Likely Low Turnout Election Voter Gender Registration Year Homeowner on Voter File Likely to Vote by Mail Likely June 2026 Voter Page 38 of 1339 Change in SupportTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 25City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . posed sales tax measure at the Final Ballot Test (55%) remained five percentage points above the simple majority (50%+1) required for passage. Whereas Table 6 displays changes in support for the measure over the course of the interview at the subgroup level, Table 7 displays the individual-level changes that occurred between the Ini- tial and Final Ballot Tests for the measure. On the left side of the table is shown each of the response options to the Initial Ballot Test and the percentage of respondents in each group. The cells in the body of the table depict movement within each response group (row) based on the information provided throughout the course of the survey as recorded by the Final Ballot Test. For example, in the first row we see that of the 27.0% of respondents who indicated that they would definitely support the measure at the Initial Ballot Test, 21.7% also indicated they would definitely support the measure at the Final Ballot Test. Approximately 4.0% moved to the proba- bly support group, 0.4% moved to the probably oppose group, 0.4% moved to the definitely oppose group, and 0.5% stated they were now unsure of their vote choice. To ease interpretation of the table, the cells are color coded. Red shaded cells indicate declining support, green shaded cells indicate increasing support, whereas white cells indicate no move- ment. Moreover, within the cells, a white font indicates a fundamental change in the vote: from yes to no, no to yes, or not sure to either yes or no. TABLE 7 MOVEMENT BETWEEN INITIAL & FINAL BALLOT TEST As one might expect, the information conveyed in the survey had the greatest impact on individ- uals who either weren’t sure about how they would vote at the Initial Ballot Test or were tentative in their vote choice (probably yes or probably no). Moreover, Table 7 makes clear that although the information did impact some voters, it did not do so in a consistent way for all respondents. Some respondents found the information conveyed during the course of the interview to be a reason to become more supportive of the measure, whereas a similar percentage found the same information reason to be less supportive. Despite 15% of respondents making a fundamen- tal5 shift in their opinion about the measure over the course of the interview, the net impact is that support for the measure at the Final Ballot Test (55%) was just one percentage point differ- ent than support at the Initial Ballot Test (56%). 5. This is, they changed from a position of support, opposition, or undecided at the Initial Ballot Test to a dif- ferent position at the Final Ballot Test. Definitely support Probably support Probably oppose Definitely oppose Not sure Definitely support 27.0%21.7% 4.0%0.4% 0.4% 0.5% Probably support 29.0%5.4% 19.1%2.0% 0.0% 2.5% Probably oppose 16.5%0.0% 1.8%9.6% 2.5%2.6% Definitely oppose 18.0%0.0% 1.3%3.2% 13.5%0.0% Not sure 9.6%0.0% 2.0% 0.8% 0.4%6.5% Initial Ballot Test (Q5) Final Ballot Test (Q11) Page 39 of 1339 Final Ballot Test at Lower RateTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 26City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F INAL BALLOT TEST AT LOWER RATE The ballot language tested throughout the survey indicated that the measure would increase the local sales tax rate by one percent and be used to fund general city services. Voters who did not support the proposed measure at the Final Ballot Test (Question 11) were subsequently asked if they would support the measure if the rate were set at a lower amount: one-half percent. As shown in Figure 15, lowering the tax rate to one-half percent generated a modest amount of additional support for the proposed measure. An additional 7% of voters indicated they would support the measure if the tax rate were lowered to one-half percent, although nearly all of the additional support for the measure was ‘soft’ (i.e., probably yes). Question 12 What if the measure I just described raised the sales tax by a lower amount: one- half percent? Would you vote yes or no on the measure? FIGURE 15 FINAL BALLOT TEST LOWER AMOUNT Prefer not to answer 1.4Not sure 9.7 Definitely no 13.8 Probably no 12.2 Probably yes 7.2 Definitely yes 0.5 Yes @ 1% (Q11) 55.2 Page 40 of 1339 Background & DemographicsTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 27City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B ACKGROUND & DEMOGRAPHICS TABLE 8 DEMOGRAPHICS OF SAMPLE In addition to questions directly related to the pro- posed measure, the study collected basic demo- graphic information about respondents and their households. Some of this information was gathered during the interview, although much of it was col- lected from the voter file. The profile of the likely November 2026 voter sample represented in this report is shown in Table 8. Total Respondents 519 Years in Hermosa Beach (Q1) Less than 5 15.7 5 to 9 16.2 10 to 14 16.0 15 or more 52.0 Prefer not to answer 0.1 Child in Hsld (Q14) Yes 26.3 No 71.7 Prefer not to answer 1.9 Gender Male 47.8 Female 47.7 Non-binary 0.8 Prefer not to answer 3.7 Party Democrat 46.7 Republican 22.6 Other / DTS 30.7 Age 18 to 29 13.0 30 to 39 15.3 40 to 49 17.6 50 to 64 29.5 65 or older 24.6 Registration Year Since June 2016 33.5 Before June 2016 66.5 Household Party Type Single dem 26.6 Dual dem 10.5 Single rep 12.4 Dual rep 4.7 Other 22.4 Mixed 23.4 Homeowner on Voter File Yes 53.8 No 46.2 Likely to Vote by Mail Yes 76.9 No 23.1 Likely Jun 2026 Voter Yes 58.4 No 41.6 Likely Low Turnout Election Voter Yes 41.1 No 58.9 Page 41 of 1339 MethodologyTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 28City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M ETHODOLOGY The following sections outline the methodology used in the study, as well as the motivation for using certain techniques. QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT Dr. McLarney of True North Research worked closely with the City to develop a questionnaire that covered the topics of interest and avoided possible sources of systematic measurement error, including position-order effects, wording effects, response-category effects, scaling effects, and priming. Several questions included multiple indi- vidual items. Because asking the items in a set order can lead to a systematic position bias in responses, items were asked in random order for each respondent. Some of the questions asked in this study were presented only to a subset of respondents. For example, only individuals who did not support the sales tax or were unsure at the Initial Ballot Test (Question 5) were asked to describe the reason for their position (Question 6). In some cases, two versions of a question were tested to identify how wording differences impact percep- tions of the item. In such cases, half of the sample received the item with version 1 wording (e.g., Question 10, item D1) and the other half received version 2 (e.g., Question 10, item D2). The questionnaire included with this report (see Questionnaires & Toplines on page 31) identifies the skip patterns and programming instructions used in the survey to ensure each respondent received the appropriate questions. PROGRAMMING & PRE-TEST Prior to fielding the survey, the questionnaire was CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing) programmed to assist interviewers when conduct- ing telephone interviews. The CATI program automatically navigates skip patterns, randomizes the appropriate question items, and alerts the interviewer to certain types of keypunching mis- takes should they occur. The survey was also programmed into a passcode-protected online sur- vey application to allow online participation for sampled voters. The integrity of the questionnaire was pre-tested internally by True North and by dialing into voter households in the City prior to formally beginning the survey. SAMPLE The survey was administered to a stratified and clustered random sample of regis- tered voters in the City who are likely to participate in the November 2026 general election, with a subset who are also likely to participate in the lower-turnout June 2026 primary. Consistent with the profile of this universe, the sample was stratified into clusters, each representing a com- bination of age, gender, and household party type. Individuals were then randomly selected based on their profile into an appropriate cluster. This method ensures that if a person of a par- ticular profile refuses to participate, they are replaced by an individual who shares their same profile. STATISTICAL MARGIN OF ERROR By using the probability-based sampling design noted above, True North ensured that the final sample was representative of voters in the City who are likely to participate in the November 2026 general election. The results of the survey can thus be used to estimate the opinions of all voters likely to participate in said election. Because not all voters participated in the study, however, the results have what is known as a sta- tistical margin of error due to sampling. The margin of error refers to the difference between what was found in the survey of 519 voters for a particular question and what would have been Page 42 of 1339 MethodologyTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 29City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . found if all of the estimated 11,560 likely November 2026 voters identified in the City had been surveyed for the study. Figure 16 provides a graphic plot of the maximum margin of error in this study. The maximum margin of error for a dichotomous percentage result occurs when the answers are evenly split such that 50% provide one response and 50% provide the alternative response. For this survey, the maximum margin of error is ± 4.2%. FIGURE 16 MAXIMUM MARGIN OF ERROR DUE TO SAMPLING Within this report, figures and tables show how responses to certain questions varied by sub- groups such as age, gender, and partisan affiliation. Figure 16 is thus useful for understanding how the maximum margin of error for a percentage estimate will grow as the number of individ- uals asked a question (or in a particular subgroup) shrinks. Because the margin of error grows exponentially as the sample size decreases, the reader should use caution when generalizing and interpreting the results for small subgroups. RECRUITING & DATA COLLECTION The survey followed a mixed-method design that employed multiple recruiting methods (telephone, text, and email) and multiple data collection methods (telephone and online). Telephone interviews averaged 16 minutes in length and were conducted during weekday evenings (5:30PM to 9PM) and on weekends (10AM to 5PM). It is stan- dard practice not to call during the day on weekdays because most working adults are unavail- able and thus calling during those hours would likely bias the sample. Voters recruited via email and text were assigned a unique passcode to ensure that only voters who received an invitation could access the online survey site, and that each voter could com- plete the survey only one time. During the data collection period, email reminder notices were also sent to encourage participation among those who had yet to take the survey. A total of 519 surveys were completed between April 16 and April 23, 2026. 519 Respondents ± 4.2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Sample Size (Number of Respondents)Margin of ErrorPage 43 of 1339 MethodologyTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 30City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DATA PROCESSING Data processing consisted of checking the data for errors or inconsis- tencies, coding and recoding responses, weighting, and preparing frequency analyses and cross- tabulations. ROUNDING Numbers that end in 0.5 or higher are rounded up to the nearest whole num- ber, whereas numbers that end in 0.4 or lower are rounded down to the nearest whole number. These same rounding rules are also applied, when needed, to arrive at numbers that include a decimal place in constructing figures and tables. Occasionally, these rounding rules lead to small discrepancies in the first decimal place when comparing tables and charts for a given question. Page 44 of 1339 Questionnaires & ToplinesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 31City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q UESTIONNAIRES & TOPLINES True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 1 City of Herm os a Beach Baseline Sales T ax Feasibility Surv ey Final Toplines (n=519) April 2026 Section 1: Introduction to Study Hi, may I please speak to _____. My name is _____, and I’m calling from TNR on behalf of the City of Hermosa (her-MOW-suh) Beach. We’re conducting a confidential survey of voters about important issues in the city and I’d like to get your opinions. If needed: This is a survey about important issues in your community. I’m NOT trying to sell anything and I won’t ask for a donation. If needed: The survey should take about 12 minutes to complete. If needed: If now is not a convenient time, can you let me know a better time so I can call back? If the person asks why you need to speak to the listed person or if they ask to participate instead, explain: For statistical purposes, at this time the survey must only be completed by this particular individual. Section 2: Quality of L ife & City Serv ices I’d like to begin by asking you a few questions about what it is like to live in Hermosa Beach. Q1 How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? 1 Less than 1 year 3% 2 1 to 4 years 13% 3 5 to 9 years 16% 4 10 to 14 years 16% 5 15 years or longer 52% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% Q2 How would you rate the overall quality of life in Hermosa Beach? Would you say it is excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? 1 Excellent 49% 2 Good 45% 3 Fair 5% 4 Poor 0% 5 Very poor 1% 98 Not sure 0% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% Page 45 of 1339 Questionnaires & ToplinesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 32City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 2 Q3 If the city government could change one thing to make Hermosa Beach a better place to live now and in the future, what change would you like to see? Verbatim responses recorded and later grouped into categories shown below. Address parking issues 11% Address E-bike issues 11% Not sure / Cannot think of anything specific 10% Clean up, beautify City 7% Address homeless issues 6% Enforce traffic laws 5% Limit growth, development 5% Support small, local businesses 5% No changes needed / Everything is fine 5% Improve infrastructure, streets, roads 4% Enforce city codes 4% Put utilities underground 4% Provide more bike lane connections, separate from walking paths 4% Improve fiscal management, budgeting 4% Provide a community pool 4% Provide a dog park, dog beach 4% Improve public safety 3% Improve parks, rec facilities 3% Provide more police presence, response 3% Fix, improve the pier 3% Enforce noise ordinance 3% Reduce traffic congestion 2% Provide more affordable housing 2% Reduce taxes, fees 2% Improve public transportation 2% Improve shopping, dining opportunities 2% Provide rec activities, events for all ages 2% Improve City Council, Gov process 2% Address rent control issue 2% Fix, upgrade rundown, empty buildings 2% Reduce building permit restrictions 2% Improve pedestrian safety, crossings 2% Do not allow dogs on beach 2% Page 46 of 1339 Questionnaires & ToplinesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 33City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 3 Q4 Generally speaking, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the job the City of Hermosa Beach is doing to provide city services? Get answer, then ask: Would that be very (satisfied/dissatisfied) or somewhat (satisfied/dissatisfied)? 1 Very satisfied 31% 2 Somewhat satisfied 48% 3 Somewhat dissatisfied 12% 4 Very dissatisfied 4% 98 Not sure 4% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% Section 3: I nitia l B allot T es t Later this year, voters in Hermosa Beach may be asked to vote on a local ballot measure. Let me read you a summary of the measure. Q5 To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as: Paving streets and fixing potholes Repairing aging infrastructure Keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well- maintained Fire protection, paramedic, and 9-1-1 emergency response Police and crime prevention shall City of Hermosa Beach’s ordinance establishing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? 1 Definitely yes 27% Skip to Q7 2 Probably yes 29% Skip to Q7 3 Probably no 16% Ask Q6 4 Definitely no 18% Ask Q6 98 Not sure 9% Ask Q6 99 Prefer not to answer 0% Skip to Q7 Q6 Is there a particular reason why you do not support or are unsure about the measure I just described? If yes, ask: Please briefly describe your reason. Verbatim responses recorded and later grouped into categories shown below. Money is misspent, mismanaged 32% Taxes already too high 28% Need more information 20% Economic, inflation, cost of living concerns 15% Other ways to be funded 8% It will hurt local economy 7% Page 47 of 1339 Questionnaires & ToplinesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 34City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 4 City has enough money 5% Do not trust City 5% Not sure / No particular reason 5% Lack of public oversight with general tax 3% Money will go to employee salaries, pensions 3% City services are okay as-is, no need for more money 2% Other higher priorities in community 2% Money should not go to law enforcement 2% Section 4: Pr ojects & Ser v ices Q7 The measure we’ve been discussing will provide funding for a variety of services in your community. If the measure passes, would you favor or oppose using some of the money to: _____, or do you not have an opinion? Get answer, if favor or oppose, then ask: Would that be strongly (favor/oppose) or somewhat (favor/oppose)? Randomize. Strongly favor Somewhat favor Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose No sure Prefer not to answer A Pave streets and fix potholes 56% 33% 4% 3% 3% 1% B Repair or replace aging infrastructure 46% 38% 3% 3% 7% 2% C Keep streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained 66% 25% 2% 2% 3% 2% D Provide fire protection and paramedic services 54% 26% 5% 6% 6% 2% E Provide quick responses to 9-1-1 emergencies 57% 25% 3% 5% 7% 3% F Provide police and crime prevention services 47% 27% 10% 8% 6% 2% G Address homelessness 45% 28% 9% 8% 9% 2% H Provide e-Bike enforcement 55% 23% 9% 7% 6% 1% I Remove graffiti 40% 32% 11% 6% 9% 2% J Provide recreation programs for all ages 30% 38% 13% 9% 8% 2% K Repair and maintain the sewer and stormdrain system 48% 35% 5% 3% 7% 2% L Maintain city landscaping and street trees 44% 41% 5% 4% 4% 2% Page 48 of 1339 Questionnaires & ToplinesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 35City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 5 Section 5: P ositiv e A r guments What I’d like to do now is tell you what some people are saying about the measure we’ve been discussing. Q8 Supporters of the measure say: _____. Do you think this is a very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to SUP P O RT the measure? Randomize Very convincing Somewhat convincing Not at all convincing Don’ t believe Not sure Prefer not to answer A The measure includes a clear system of accountability including citizen oversight, independent audits, and public disclosure of how all funds are spent. 27% 35% 12% 19% 6% 2% B All money raised by the measure will stay local to fund essential services and facilities here in Hermosa Beach. By law, it can’t be taken away by the State or the County. 39% 35% 9% 11% 4% 2% C By keeping our city safe, clean and well- maintained, this measure will help protect our quality of life and keep Hermosa Beach a special place to live. 31% 44% 12% 8% 4% 2% D Most of the sales tax generated locally goes to the State of California or Los Angeles County. This measure ensures that a higher percentage of our sales tax dollars will stay here in Hermosa Beach and we have local control over how those funds are spent. 33% 36% 14% 12% 4% 2% E The City maintains 47 miles of streets, 70 miles of sidewalks, and 112 acres of beaches, parks and playfields. This measure provides the funding we need to keep our streets, infrastructure, and parks in good condition. 33% 40% 13% 9% 4% 2% F Fast emergency response times for 9-1-1 calls are critical for saving lives. This measure will ensure that we have enough police officers, firefighters, and paramedics to respond quickly to 9-1-1 emergencies. 32% 35% 13% 13% 5% 2% G This measure makes good financial sense. Most of the money raised by the sales tax comes from people who visit or pass through Hermosa Beach, but don’t live here. 23% 32% 18% 22% 2% 2% H The City has more than 220 million dollars in unfunded street and infrastructure projects that need to be completed. The longer we wait to fix our streets, infrastructure, and facilities, the more expensive it will become. 32% 36% 14% 12% 4% 2% I This measure will cost just 1 dollar for every 100 dollars purchased. And food, medicine, and many other essential items are excluded from the tax. 29% 34% 21% 10% 4% 3% Page 49 of 1339 Questionnaires & ToplinesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 36City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 6 Section 6: Interim B a llot T est Sometimes people change their mind about a measure once they have more information about it. Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a summary of it again. Q9 To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as: Paving streets and fixing potholes Repairing aging infrastructure Keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well- maintained Fire protection, paramedic, and 9-1-1 emergency response Police and crime prevention shall City of Hermosa Beach’s ordinance establishing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? 1 Definitely yes 29% 2 Probably yes 32% 3 Probably no 15% 4 Definitely no 15% 98 Not sure 8% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% Section 7: Negativ e A rgum ents Next, let me tell you what opponents of the measure are saying. Q10 Opponents of the measure say: _____. Do you think this is a very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to OPPOSE the measure? Randomize. Split Sample D1/D2 Very convincing Somewhat convincing Not at all convincing Don’ t believe Not sure Prefer not to answer A Residents and local businesses have been hit hard by inflation, high interest rates, and cost of living increases. Many are struggling to stay afloat. Now is not the time to raise taxes. 38% 35% 16% 4% 4% 3% B There are no guarantees on how funds will be spent, which means the City can divert the money to pet projects without any say from voters. We can’t trust the City with our tax dollars. They will mismanage the money. 32% 36% 16% 8% 5% 4% Page 50 of 1339 Questionnaires & ToplinesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 37City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 7 C Everyone is coming after us for tax increases – including state and county taxes, school bonds, and other taxes that will be on the ballot this year. Enough is enough. We can’t afford to keep raising our taxes. 36% 35% 17% 5% 5% 3% D1 This tax will last forever. It will never expire. 33% 27% 16% 13% 7% 3% D2 The City tried to increase the sales tax twice in recent years, and twice the voters said NO. Rather than listening to voters, the City is trying it a third time. 31% 31% 23% 3% 8% 4% Section 8: Fina l B allot T es t Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a summary of it one more time. Q11 To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as: Paving streets and fixing potholes Repairing aging infrastructure Keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well- maintained Fire protection, paramedic, and 9-1-1 emergency response Police and crime prevention shall City of Hermosa Beach’s ordinance establishing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? 1 Definitely yes 27% Skip to Q13 2 Probably yes 28% Skip to Q13 3 Probably no 16% Ask Q12 4 Definitely no 17% Ask Q12 98 Not sure 11% Ask Q12 99 Prefer not to answer 1% Skip to Q13 Q12 What if the measure I just described raised the sales tax by a lower amount: one-half percent? Would you vote yes or no on the measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? Yes @ 1% (Q11) 55% 1 Definitely yes 0% 2 Probably yes 7% 3 Probably no 12% 4 Definitely no 14% 98 Not sure 10% 99 Prefer not to answer 1% Page 51 of 1339 Questionnaires & ToplinesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 38City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 8 Section 9: Ba ck gr ound & Demograph ics Thank you so much for your participation. I have just two background questions for statistical purposes. Q13 In your opinion, has the City of Hermosa Beach done an excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor job of managing its financial resources? 1 Excellent 3% 2 Good 26% 3 Fair 27% 4 Poor 13% 5 Very poor 8% 98 Not sure 21% 99 Prefer not to answer 1% Q14 Do you have children under the age of 18 living in your household? 1 Yes 26% 2 No 72% 99 Prefer not to answer 2% Those are all of the questions that I have for you. Thanks so much for participating in this important survey. Post-Interview & Sample Items S1 Gender 1 Male 48% 2 Female 48% 3 Non-binary 1% 4 Prefer not to answer 4% S2 Party 1 Democrat 47% 2 Republican 23% 3 Other 8% 4 DTS 23% Page 52 of 1339 Questionnaires & ToplinesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 39City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 9 S3 Age on Voter File 1 18 to 29 13% 2 30 to 39 15% 3 40 to 49 18% 4 50 to 64 30% 5 65 or older 25% S4 Registration Date 1 Since Nov 2020 16% 2 Jun 2016 to before Nov 2020 17% 3 Jun 2012 to before Jun 2016 9% 4 Before June 2012 58% S5 Household Party Type 1 Single Dem 27% 2 Dual Dem 11% 3 Single Rep 12% 4 Dual Rep 5% 5 Single Other 15% 6 Dual Other 7% 7 Dem & Rep 5% 8 Dem & Other 12% 9 Rep & Other 4% 0 Mixed (Dem + Rep + Other) 2% S6 Homeowner on Voter File 1 Yes 54% 2 No 46% S7 Likely to Vote by Mail 1 Yes 77% 2 No 23% Page 53 of 1339 Questionnaires & ToplinesTrue North Research, Inc. © 2026 40City of Hermosa Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 10 S8 Likely November 2026 Voter 1 Yes 100% 2 No 0% S9 Likely June 2026 Voter 1 Yes 58% 2 No 42% S10 Likely Low Turnout Election Voter 1 Yes 41% 2 No 59% Page 54 of 1339 5/26/2026 R EVENUE M EASURE S TUDY C ONDUCTED FOR THE C ITY OF H ERMOSA B EACH P RESENTED B Y T IMOTHY M C L ARNEY P H .D. Page 55 of 1339 22 o Determine if a local sales tax measure is feasible o Identify how to create a measure consistent with community priorities o Gather information needed for communications & outreach PURPOSE OF STUDY Page 56 of 1339 33 o How did we select voters to survey? o Stratified & Clustered Random Sample of likely November 2026 voters using age, gender, partisanship, household party type, and sub-geographies o Ensures balanced, representative sample of likely voters o How did we recruit participation? o Personalized email, text, and telephone calls o PINs to restrict access and ensure one complete per respondent o How were voters able to share their opinions? o Secure, PIN-protected website that scales to the device o Telephone (land line or mobile) o April 16th to April 23rd, 2026 o What was the sample size? o 519 completed interviews o Overall margin of error of ±4.2% @ 95% level of confidence METHODOLOGY OF STUDY Page 57 of 1339 44 QUALITY OF LIFE Not sure 0.1 Very poor 0.6Poor 0.3 Fair 5.2 Good 45.0 Excellent 48.7 Page 58 of 1339 55 CHANGES TO IMPROVE CITY 11.3 11.1 10.2 7.1 6.0 5.3 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.3 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.8 3.9 4.5 2.1 0 5 10 15 Address parking issues Address E-bike issues Not sure / Cannot think of anything specific Clean up, beautify City Address homeless issues Limit growth, development No changes needed / Everything is fine Support small, local businesses Enforce traffic laws Improve fiscal management, budgeting Provide more bike lane connections, separate from walking paths Enforce city codes Put utilities underground Provide a community pool Provide a dog park, dog beach Improve infrastructure, streets, roads Improve public safety Fix, improve the pier Provide more police presence, response Improve parks, rec facilities Enforce noise ordinance Provide rec activities, events for all ages Do not allow dogs on beach Provide more affordable housing Reduce taxes, fees Fix, upgrade rundown, empty buildings Reduce traffic congestion Improve pedestrian safety, crossings Reduce building permit restrictions Improve City Council, Gov process Improve shopping, dining opportunities Address rent control issue Improve public transportation % Respondents Page 59 of 1339 66 OVERALL SATISFACTION Very satisfied 31.1 Somewhat satisfied 48.2 Somewhat dissatisfied 12.1 Very dissatisfied 4.0 Not sure 4.1 Prefer not to answer 0.5 Page 60 of 1339 77 INITIAL BALLOT TEST To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as: o Paving streets and fixing potholes o Repairing aging infrastructure o Keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained o Fire protection, paramedic, and 911 emergency response o Police and crime prevention shall City of Hermosa Beach’s ordinance establishing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Page 61 of 1339 88 INITIAL BALLOT TEST Prefer not to answer 0.3Not sure 9.3 Definitely no 18.0 Probably no 16.5 Probably yes 29.0 Definitely yes 27.0 56%34% Page 62 of 1339 99 PROJECTS & SERVICES 65.6 55.9 43.9 46.0 48.2 56.9 54.4 54.6 47.1 44.6 40.4 30.1 25.0 33.0 41.2 38.1 35.0 25.5 26.1 22.8 27.1 27.5 31.7 37.9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Keep streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained Pave streets and fix potholes Maintain city landscaping and street trees Repair or replace aging infrastructure Repair and maintain the sewer and stormdrain system Provide quick responses to 911 emergencies Provide fire protection and paramedic services Provide e-Bike enforcement Provide police and crime prevention services Address homelessness Remove graffiti Provide recreation programs for all ages % Respondents Strongly favor Somewhat favor Page 63 of 1339 1010 POSITIVE ARGUMENTS 39.3 30.5 32.8 32.7 32.3 32.0 29.1 27.2 22.9 35.5 43.5 39.9 35.9 36.0 35.0 33.9 34.8 32.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 All money raised by measure will stay local to fund essential services, facilities here in Hermosa Beach; by law, it can’t be taken away by State or County By keeping city safe, clean, well-maintained, measure will help protect quality of life, keep Hermosa Beach a special place to live City maintains 47 mi of streets, 70 mi of sidewalks, 112 acres of beaches, parks, playfields; measure provides funding we need to keep streets, infrastructure, parks in good condition Most of sales tax goes to State, County; measure ensures higher percentage of sales tax dollars stay here in Hermosa Beach, we have local control over how those funds are spent City has $220M+ in unfunded street, infrastructure projects that need to be completed; the longer we wait to fix streets, infrastructure, facilities, the more expensive it will become Fast response times for 911 calls critical for saving lives; measure will ensure that we have enough police officers, firefighters, paramedics to respond quickly to 911 emergencies Measure will cost just $1 for every $100 purchased; food, medicine, many other essential items are excluded from tax Measure includes a clear system of accountability incl citizen oversight, independent audits, public disclosure of how all funds are spent Measure makes good financial sense; most of money raised by sales tax comes from people who visit, pass through Hermosa Beach, but don’t live here % Respondents Very convincing Somewhat convincing Page 64 of 1339 1111 INTERIM BALLOT TEST Definitely yes 29.3 Probably yes 32.2 Probably no 14.5 Definitely no 15.4 Not sure 8.2 Prefer not to answer 0.3 62% 30% Page 65 of 1339 1212 NEGATIVE ARGUMENTS 37.9 35.7 31.7 31.3 33.2 34.8 34.7 36.0 31.1 27.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Residents, local businesses have been hit hard by inflation, high interest rates, cost of living increases; many are struggling to stay afloat; now is not the time to raise taxes Everyone is coming after us for tax increases, incl state, county taxes, school bonds, other taxes that will be on ballot this yr; enough is enough; we can’t afford to keep raising taxes There are no guarantees on how funds will be spent, City can divert money to pet projects without any say from voters; we can’t trust City with tax dollars; they will mismanage money City tried to increase sales tax twice in recent yrs, twice voters said NO; rather than listening to voters, City is trying it a third time This tax will last forever. It will never expire % Respondents Very convincing Somewhat convincing Page 66 of 1339 1313 FINAL BALLOT TEST Prefer not to answer 1.2Not sure 10.8 Definitely no 16.8 Probably no 16.0 Probably yes 28.0 Definitely yes 27.1 55%33% Page 67 of 1339 1414 FINAL BALLOT TEST AT HALF CENT RATE Prefer not to answer 1.4Not sure 9.7 Definitely no 13.8 Probably no 12.2 Probably yes 7.2 Definitely yes 0.5 Yes @ 1% (Q11) 55.2 Page 68 of 1339 1515 KEY CONCLUSIONS o Does a local sales tax measure appear to be feasible for November 2026? Yes . Positive Signs o Voters value the quality of life in Hermosa Beach and the services they receive from the City, but also see room for improvements o Sufficient natural support for measure to fund city services (56%) o Popular projects and services o Positive arguments resonate o All ballot tests are above the simple majority (50%+1) required for passage of general tax, even after opposition arguments Challenges & External Factors o Receptiveness to potential opposition arguments (-7%) o Electoral climate: Hyper-partisanship o (Un)knowns: Trajectory of war, fuel prices, economy, tariffs, inflation, and competing measures Page 69 of 1339 1616 o Snapshot in time, not a crystal ball o Service Priorities:Public works and public safety. o City Communications: Begin a conversation with the community to build awareness of ongoing needs, unfunded capital improvements/deferred maintenance, and consensus on a proposal. o Independent Campaign:Need to have solid independent campaign to navigate through the election cycle, communicate key messages, turn out supporters, and weather uncertainties. OBSERVATIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS Page 70 of 1339 Page 71 of 1339 City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026Ecomment Report Agenda Item Name CommentPosition Attachment URLCONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL EVENT POLICY GUIDE AND FEE UPDATES - 26-PR-027Todd Tullis When these policy & fee changes were reviewed by the Commission (April 16 2026), the RCS fee study showing that special event costs exceeded revenues by ~$350k had yet to be made public. During the Commission meeting we were assured by Staff that these changes would result in the city covering its costs, though no specifics of estimating methodology were shared. Given the magnitude of the subsidy being provided is now known, I hope that Staff can "show their work" around cost estimation for Special Events so that the public and Council have confidence that these new fee amounts will recover city costs.ForFY 2026-2027 BUDGET PRESENTATIONS - 26-AS-061Todd Tullis I encourage the Council to work "big to small" - by this I mean to start with the highest dollar items first - when directing action or making decisions on the available revenue options. Specifically regarding TOT/Short Term Rentals I hope Council can ensure there are lawful and resident-friendly operational limits and that the city can collect its share of taxes from these stays that are likely to increase in frequency.ForPage 72 of 1339 City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026Ecomment ReportAWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PROJECT ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY YARD PROJECT -26-PW-025Ira Ellman In January of this year, the City Council made the decision to spend $565K for Owners Representative Services over four years related to the City Yard. This was a poor decision without determining how Hermosa Beach would pay the required estimated $20mm remediation and construction costs. In that January meeting, the City Manager said that raising meter and citation rates would create a new revenue stream and not our intention to program those in the next budget, but to have those set aside to extent possible to fund this. I dont believe that is the case, as these incremental revenue streams, along with creative accounting, are what is being used to balance the 2026-2027 Budget. Now, staff are proposing spending an additional $574K on City Yard CEQA and environmental services. With the current difficult financial situation the city faces, it continues to be increasingly obvious that no additional funds should be invested in the City Yard until funding the project is resolved.AgainstCONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL EVENT POLICY GUIDE AND FEE UPDATES - 26-PR-027tonyhiggins Please click/tap on pdf aboveAgainsthttps://pub-hermosabeach.escribemeetings.com/FileStream.ashx?DocumentId=58399Page 73 of 1339 City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026Ecomment ReportAWARD OF CONTRACT TO MOFFAT & NICHOL FOR PREPARATION OF A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PLAN. - 26-CMO-032Richard G I am opposed to this contract award. this topic has been well addressed in the 'Local Hazard Mitigation Plan' of 2017. At most, Staff can be directed to update that excellent report. Besides, an earthquake that destroys our infrastructure is our more likely doom scenario.AgainstPage 74 of 1339 City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026Ecomment ReportAWARD OF CONTRACT TO MOFFAT & NICHOL FOR PREPARATION OF A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PLAN. - 26-CMO-032Tracy HAGAINST Sea Level Rise (SLR) adaptation planning requires strong justificationparticularly when recent scientific updates question the extremes of both high- and low-end projections that often drive such plans.  https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/2627/2026/Hermosa Beach is confronting significant fiscal strain, with City Council budget sessions projecting a **$3.2 million structural general-fund deficit** for FY 2027 and a cumulative five-year shortfall approaching $19.3 million. One-time measures (pandemic aid, vacancy savings, deferred spending) have been exhausted, prompting discussions of departmental cuts, fee increases, and other difficult choices to protect core services. In this context, a nearly $474,000 three-year commitment (through April 30, 2029) for sea level rise adaptation planning requires strong justificationparticularly when recent scientific updates question the extremes of both high- and low-end projections that often drive such plans. ### Questionable Scientific Foundation: Implausible High-End and Inconsistent Low-End ProjectionsThe **European Geosciences Union** (EGU) *Geoscientific Model Development* (2026) paper on the ScenarioMIP-CMIP7 framework highlights important limitations in prior scenarios used for climate planning. Specifically: - **High-end projections**: CMIP6 high-emission scenarios like **SSP5-8.5** (and its predecessor RCP8.5) "have become implausible" due to trends in renewable energy costs, policy developments, and recent emissions data. The new CMIP7 scenarios narrow the high end, with forcings expected below previous extreme levels.- **Low-end projections**: "At the low end, many CMIP6 emission trajectories have become inconsistent with observed trends during the 20202030 period." This indicates that aggressive low-emission pathways assumed in earlier modeling often do not align with real-world developments in the current decade.These findings underscore that extreme scenariosboth very high and very lowat the tails of previous projections lack strong plausibility or consistency with observed data. Many coastal adaptation plans, including those influencing California communities, have leaned on upper-bound sea level rise estimates tied to high-emission pathways to justify expansive (and costly) measures. Relying on such assumptions now risks over-preparing for low-likelihood outcomes while underweighting more central, plausible trajectories. The paper stresses designing scenarios within a "wide and plausible range," prioritizing internal consistency and realism over legacy extremes.For Hermosa Beach, this calls for **prudent recalibration**: Focus on robust, no-regrets strategies (e.g., enhanced beach management, drainage improvements) based on updated, moderate projections rather than committing substantial funds to plans potentially anchored in outdated high-end assumptions. ### Moffatt & Nichol: Suboptimal Fit Amid Fiscal Constraints Moffatt & Nichol brings strong expertise in large-scale port, harbor, and regional transportation infrastructure projects. However, this orientation is less ideal for a compact, primarily residential beach community like Hermosa, where adaptation needs center on localized issues such as wave run-up, groundwater intrusion, minor flooding, and recreational beach preservation. Their portfolio skews toward major engineering endeavors that could produce recommendations disproportionate to the city's scale and budget realities.With structural deficits projected and core services under pressure, outsourcing to a firm geared toward bigger-ticket solutions increases the chance of over-scoped outcomes. Hermosa has conducted prior climate-related assessments; layering on another comprehensive plan at this price point duplicates effort when resources are needed elsewhere.### Recommendations - **Re-scope or pause** the contract to incorporate the latest CMIP7-aligned science and limit scope to essential, cost-effective updates.- Prioritize monitoring of actual local sea level and erosion trends over speculative long-term modeling.- Explore lower-cost alternatives: academic collaborations, state resources, or targeted engineering studies focused on proven resilience measures.- Align any planning with fiscal disciplinedefer non-urgent expenditures until the structural budget gap is addressed sustainably.Awarding this contract now would commit significant funds (and staff time) amid documented deficits for planning that should be grounded in the most current, plausible science. The EGU/GMD analysis provides clear rationale for caution on both high- and low-end extremes, reinforcing the need for evidence-based restraint in Hermosa Beach's current fiscal climate. Council should prioritize core services and flexible, adaptive management over this expenditure.Source Assistance: AIAgainstZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE - 26-CDD-045Stacy Straus, Srour & AssociatesTo Hermosa Beach City Council,I am in support of the proposed changes to Administrative Procedures being presented to you. As a regular representative of applications for residential and commercial development in the City of Hermosa Beach, it is encouraging to see the proposed changes, as they create clarity, allow transparency, they will save time for an applicant, and mostly they allow for predictability, which applicants need as they consider investing in this City. I attended a session with Planning Manager Oropeza where I was able to ask questions about the proposed changes, give comments and get and give clarification. Ms. Oropeza had a command of the Muni Code, was able to address my comments and questions, made changes in the draft proposal regarding the detailed implementation questions and she took into account my concerns. I hope we have your support in making the changes to the City procedure that will give applicants the direction, clarity and transparency they need when considering development in Hermosa Beach. I am available for questions or discussion as well. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stacy StrausForPage 75 of 1339 City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026Ecomment ReportCONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL EVENT POLICY GUIDE AND FEE UPDATES - 26-PR-027Laura PenaDear City Council -I appreciate the effort to improve clarity and administrative efficiency in the Special Event Policy Guide. I believe this item should be viewed as more than a permit guide update. It is also an economic and fiscal policy decision.The Citys fee study shows that Community Resources recovers only 47.3% of its costs overall, and that Special Event Permit activity recovers only about 14.8% of cost. In dollar terms, that is roughly $60,000 in special event revenue against $405,896 in cost, and $1.368 million in Community Resources revenue against $2.895 million in cost. That level of under-recovery is harder to justify in the current fiscal environment.Cost RecoveryThe staff report says the proposed fees are intended to support improved cost recovery. But some of the proposed fees appear much closer to symbolic charges than true cost recovery.For example, the proposed policy sets: Long Term Agreement (LTA) application fees at $485 commercial and $291 nonprofit Reserved Parking Staging at $207 Event Modification at $114 Public Hearing at $38 plus publication costsBut the fee study shows materially higher documented costs: LTA cost: $8,784 Reserved Parking Staging cost: $542 Event Modification cost: $527 Public Hearing cost: $176 The LTA example is especially important. Even at the fee studys 35% recovery benchmark, the multi-year agreement fee would be $1,902 for commercial events and $1,141 for nonprofits. Instead, the proposed fees are $485 and $291. The proposed commercial LTA fee appears to recover only about 5.5% of the Citys documented cost, not 35%.I understand from Commissioner feedback that when this item was before the Commission on April 16th, the fee study results were not yet public and the estimating methodology was not shared.I also think there is an important local business equity issue here. I am concerned about the difference between the subsidies being effectively provided to sponsors and participants within large special events versus the fee burden placed on our small businesses trying to do modest activations. For example, the fee study shows a co-sponsor fee of $356 per sponsor within the special event program, while the Temporary Minor Special Event fee in the Citys permit structure is $1,900, with a $335 date change fee. That creates the impression that a local business trying to do small activations may be paying far more than a sponsor participating within a larger event ecosystem.LTA FrameworkI am concerned about the proposed LTA framework. It is too thin. The draft reduces eligibility to only one threshold, that an event has been held in our City for at least three consecutive years, and limits obligations to a post-event presentation focused on attendance, community impacts, and successes and challenges. Longevity alone should not be enough to justify recurring priority access to public space and City resources. LTAs should also demonstrate measurable economic value, operational reliability, and a clear public return.The City has the most leverage at the front end of these negotiations. If staff enters into LTA negotiations without specific deliverables such as local business activation, measurable economic reporting, cost recovery expectations, and compliance standards, we may not be setting these agreements up as true win-win arrangements.Peak Season Limits CitywideWhat problem are we actually trying to solve? If the answer is administrative ease, I do not believe that alone is a sufficient reason to impose citywide limits if that could unintentionally constrain smaller events that may better serve different parts of the City or support local businesses in a more targeted way.Hybrid Pricing ModelI would also encourage consideration of a simpler hybrid pricing model rather than relying too heavily on symbolic fee levels. A framework with a minimum base fee, actual cost billing for City services, and a revenue share above a threshold may better protect the City while still allowing event producers to benefit when events perform well. I support a stronger special events program. But if we want events to contribute to revenue generation, the policy must do more than organize the process. It must be tied to measurable public value.Iappreciateyourconsideration.AgainstZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE - 26-CDD-045Jon David PDF attacheForhttps://pub-hermosabeach.escribemeetings.com/FileStream.ashx?DocumentId=58537Page 76 of 1339 City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026Ecomment ReportZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE - 26-CDD-045Nancy SchwappachPlease see attached pdfForhttps://pub-hermosabeach.escribemeetings.com/FileStream.ashx?DocumentId=58538ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE - 26-CDD-045Laura PenaDear City Council,Thank you for creating meaningful opportunities for public feedback during the Zoning Code Update Administrative process. For those of us following these updates closely, these forums have been valuable because they allowed the public focused feedback before items reach Council. I recommend the City provide more communication about these open forums so they can engage a wider audience.The few items I would like to address lead to a broader question for Council: How does the City define success for the Administrative Procedures updates?In my view, the update is successful if compliant projects move faster, staff spends less time on avoidable process, businesses can open and improve their spaces more predictably, mixed-use housing moves from application to completion, and the City grows recurring revenue without relying only on new taxes and fees.How the City defines and publicly reports that success will matter. If residents, businesses, applicants, and investors can see that our City is improving review timelines, reducing bottlenecks, and providing more predictable service, it will increase trust and signal better quality services.I respectfully recommend the following refinements:1. Strengthen the Purpose section.The Purpose section supports orderly growth and economic development, but it does not yet connect the Administrative Procedures to measurable service outcomes. I recommend adding language stating that the zoning procedures are intended to promote timely, predictable, consolidated, and measurable review of housing, business, and development applications.This matters because zoning administration affects economic development, housing production, business openings, commercial reinvestment, and fiscal sustainability.2. Define compatible in Section 17.04.040 Definitions.I support using compatibility as an approval finding. However, because the term appears throughout the entitlement chapters, it should be clearly defined in the definitions section.Compatibility should mean the ability of a use or project to coexist with surrounding uses based on identifiable physical and operational factors such as scale, setbacks, access, parking, noise, lighting, odor, hours of operation, and other measurable impacts. It should not mean that a project must be identical to its surroundings, universally popular, or free from controversy.3. Allow Director level minor modifications for late-night establishments and outdoor uses when the change does not intensify the use or expand floor area. Outdoor dining, patios, retail display, and active frontages are important to our commercial vitality. A blanket exclusion could make it harder for businesses to make practical improvements, accessibility upgrades, safety changes, or layout adjustments even when no new impacts are created.4. Remove Section 17.03.110(C)(3) from Revocation of Permits.As proposed, this provision would allow a permit to be revoked if the approved use or activity has been suspended or dormant for more than 12 consecutive months. I respectfully recommend removing this provision. A valid permit should not be vulnerable to revocation simply because a use has been inactive for 12 months. Vacancies and delays are often caused by factors outside the control of the property owner or operator, including tenant turnover, financing, insurance, construction delays, Coastal Commission review, plan check, lease negotiations, utility upgrades, market conditions, or broader economic uncertainty.This language could unintentionally penalize property owners who are actively trying to lease, improve, finance, permit, or reactivate a space. It may also reduce the value of existing entitlements, discourage tenant improvements, complicate financing, and make investors more hesitant to take on vacant or underutilized commercial properties.5. Create a tiered Parking Plan process.Routine parking plans for small commercial spaces, changes of use, shared parking, restriping, managed parking, or modest parking adjustments should be reviewed administratively when objective criteria are met. Larger or policy level parking requests should remain with the Planning Commission.These refinements would make the code more business supportive while still protecting residents and public accountability.I appreciate the work staff has done to improve the Administrative Procedures. I encourage Council to support the update, while asking staff to define success clearly, measure outcomes publicly, and make these refinements so these procedures become a stronger economic and public service process.Asalways IappreciateyourconsiderationForPage 77 of 1339 City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026Ecomment ReportZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE - 26-CDD-045Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Dear City Council and Mayor,On behalf of Hermosa Beachs business community, the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce appreciates the Citys work to modernize the Administrative Procedures section of the Zoning Code.We support the overall goal of creating a more timely, predictable, and measurable review process for business and development applications. Clearer procedures, stronger administrative review pathways, and more consistent decision making are important steps toward supporting local businesses, property reinvestment, tenant improvements, and long term economic vitality.As the City considers adoption, we respectfully recommend three targeted refinements to better protect businesses and encourage investment.1. Section 17.03.100(A) Minor ModificationsAs proposed, the Director would not be able to approve minor revisions for late-night establishments or outdoor uses, even when the change does not intensify the use or expand approved floor area.We recommend removing this blanket exclusion. Outdoor dining, retail displays, patios, and active frontages are important to our commercial vitality. Businesses should be able to make modest, non-intensifying changes administratively. A more balanced approach would allow Director approval when the change remains consistent with the original approval and conditions.Remove Section 17.03.110(C)(3) from Revocation of Permits.As proposed, this provision would allow a permit to be revoked if the approved use or activity has been suspended or dormant for more than 12 consecutive months, as demonstrated by any form of evidence or documentation. I respectfully recommend removing this provision. A valid permit should not be vulnerable to revocation simply because a use has been inactive for 12 months. Vacancies and delays are often caused by factors outside the control of the property owner or operator, including tenant turnover, financing, insurance, construction delays, Coastal Commission review, plan check, lease negotiations, utility upgrades, market conditions, or broader economic uncertainty.This language could unintentionally penalize property owners who are actively trying to lease, improve, finance, permit, or reactivate a space. It may also reduce the value of existing entitlements, discourage tenant improvements, complicate financing, and make investors more hesitant to take on vacant or underutilized commercial properties.The City already has authority to revoke or modify permits when conditions are violated, laws are violated, approvals were obtained by fraud, the use creates a nuisance, or the permit is being exercised contrary to its terms. Those provisions appropriately focus on actual harm, noncompliance, or misuse not inactivity alone.3. Section 17.72.030 Parking Plan Review AuthorityAs written, all Parking Plans would be reviewed by the Planning Commission. We recommend creating a tiered process.Routine Parking Plans for small downtown lots, changes of use in existing buildings, shared parking, restriping, managed parking, or modest parking adjustments should be eligible for Director level review when objective criteria are met.Planning Commission review should be reserved for major parking reductions, large new development, removal of public parking, or unresolved policy issues.Parking is one of the biggest barriers to reinvestment in older commercial buildings. If every parking solution requires a public hearing, the process may discourage tenant improvements, adaptive reuse, storefront activation, and business expansion. A tiered approach would still protect parking availability while making it easier for businesses to improve and activate commercial spaces.Recommended Council DirectionThe Chamber respectfully requests that City Council support the Administrative Procedures update with direction to staff to: 1Allow Director level minor modifications for late-night establishments and outdoor uses when the change does not intensify the use or create new impacts; 2Remove this language altogether - no revocation of permits based on dormancy; 3Create a tiered Parking Plan process with Director review for routine small-scale parking requests and Planning Commission review for major or policy level requests; 4Track outcomes such as review timelines, administrative approvals, Planning Commission hearings avoided, tenant improvements, business openings, and commercial vacancy trends.Our business community supports thoughtful regulation and public accountability. But the process should also be practical, proportional, and predictable. These refinements would help the City protect neighborhoods while supporting business investment, commercial vitality, and long term fiscal health.Thank you. Hermosa chamber of Commerce and Business Advocacy Commitee. AgainstPage 78 of 1339 5/26/26 Agenda Item 11(a) Hello Council and Staff. My comment relates specifically to community reach-out and feedback. I have not been following this so cannot comment on the substance of the changes. However, I am encouraged to see the efforts to streamline matters as our City continues its efforts to make life easier for its residents and business owners, and not harder. I also appreciate this in the context of the fee discussions. I firmly believe if we are not able to recover fully for this type of activity, before raising fees we need to evaluate processes and, where we can, lower costs. So, thank you for this. Meanwhile, I am grateful the City has renewed its efforts to be transparent and engage with the community in a meaningful way. For example, during hearings about last year ’s Builder ’s Remedy application, the Planning Department did a great job of keeping residents and other stakeholders informed, by tracking email addresses of those who submitted comments or other feedback, and reaching out directly when, for example, hearing dates were extended. We very much appreciated that courtesy and those efforts. In that vein, I applaud the recent three “Drop-in Office Hours” but understand they were sparsely attended. I don’t know what efforts were made to publicize those meetings but, it seems, similar outreach would have been great. Maybe it was done but apparently there were up to 14 prior “study sessions and discussion meetings” with Economic Development “stakeholders.” Presumably anyone who participated in those prior meetings, or commented at earlier hearings, were informed of the Drop-In opportunities. Other means to publicize these events, and maybe these were done, I am just not aware, are through the email subscription list of upcoming City meetings, the City Manager report at Council meetings and the Staff Report at relevant Commission meetings. Again, I am grateful for the increased engagement and desire for robust community feedback on matters which impact us and encourage those efforts be enhanced wherever possible. And maybe all these, or similar, publicity measures were undertaken and folks were just so happy with the changes they did not feel the need to comment! Thank you for your service. Best, Nancy Schwappach Page 79 of 1339 I support this ordinance. After more than 40 years without a comprehensive update to the City’s zoning procedures, this effort is long overdue, and I appreciate the years of work by staff, the Planning Commission, and the many stakeholders who contributed to getting it here. That said, I believe a few targeted refinements would make this a substantially stronger ordinance — one that better serves residents, property owners, and small businesses – – and that matches the spirit of the City’s own stated goals of timely, predictable, and measurable permitting. 1. Precise Development Plans for Code-Compliant Housing and Mixed-Use Projects I support staff recommendations to create a “Minor PDP” that routes condos and small mixed-use in a more appropriate process. Currently every condo and every mixed-use project in Hermosa Beach — regardless of size, and regardless of whether it fully complies with city code — is required to obtain a “Major” Precise Development Plan. This means a staff report, a public hearing before the Planning Commission, applicant fees, and months of added delay, even when the project raises no policy questions and deviates from nothing in the code. This adds a negative impact to all parties with no positive effect. The data speaks for itself. Over the last 24 months, the Planning Commission has not once denied a code-compliant Condo/Mixed-use PDP. I can not count how many times I have heard Pete Hoffman say at a Planning Commission hearing “It checks all the boxes. We can’t deny it.” A guaranteed delay with a predetermined outcome is not oversight. It is process burden imposed on residents and property owners who have already done everything the City asked of them. Recommendation: Follow staff recommendation that condos and mixed-use projects that meet 100% of objective standards and seek no variance or deviation are approved at the Director-level. Full appeal rights to the Planning Commission are preserved, but a mandatory public hearing for a project that complies with everything in the code is not appropriate. If the code is objective, the review should be administrative. 2. Dormancy-Based Permit Revocation Should Be Struck All-together The proposed ordinance would allow a permit to be revoked if a use has been dormant for more than 12 consecutive months. I am asking the Council to strike this provision entirely. Most people view a vacant storefront as a problem to be solved. I’d ask Council to consider a different frame: almost every vacant commercial space in this city is actively going through something. Cleaning up. Finding a tenant. Pulling permits. Waiting on the Coastal Commission. Negotiating a lease. Working through financing. Managing insurance or ADA compliance issues. The transition is rarely visible from the street — but that does not mean it isn’t happening. Page 80 of 1339 Consider the Becker building, which many of you know. Don English had tenants and wanted to make a transition that should have been straightforward. But once the project entered the regulatory process — Planning Commission routing, solar requirements, and California ADA elevator requirements — each layer added months. What should have been a manageable transition became years of vacancy. That building was not abandoned. It was stuck. And no revocation clock would have helped — it would only have added pressure and uncertainty to an owner already navigating a complex system. Furthermore, tenanting a commercial property is a completely different animal to residential property. Lenders and investors build extended vacancy periods into every deal they underwrite. Standard lease-up assumptions are 6 to 12 months for office, 8 to 12-plus months for retail, and 12 to 24 months for stabilized occupancy in new or significantly vacant buildings. These are not failure scenarios — they are normal market transitions. When commercial properties are finally tenanted, the leases are typically 5-10yrs, or longer, so getting the right tenant is important. The answer to vacancy is not a penalty. The answer is a system that allows smoother transitions. The City already has code enforcement tools to address genuinely abandoned or nuisance properties. A new dormancy-based revocation trigger is not needed for that purpose — and its reach goes well beyond it. Recommendation: Strike §17.03.110(C)(3) in its entirety. 3. Parking Plans — Create a Tiered Review Process As written, all Parking Plans are reviewed by the Planning Commission. This is disproportionate and discourages reinvestment in small local events, and older, small commercial buildings where parking is already one of the biggest barriers to tenant improvements, adaptive reuse, and storefront activation. A small downtown lot with eight parking spaces is not a policy question. It is arithmetic. Routing that kind of routine adjustment through a Planning Commission hearing adds months of delay and cost to projects that need neither. Recommendation: Establish a tiered Parking Plan process. Director-level review should be available for routine plans: restriping, shared parking arrangements, small changes of use, modest parking adjustments, and managed parking for smaller events and commercial lots. Planning Commission review should be reserved for major parking reductions, large new development, removal of public parking, or situations involving unresolved policy questions. This preserves Commission oversight where it genuinely matters while removing unnecessary process burden from straightforward cases. Entitlement Expiration — Allow Exercise of Permit Entitlements can expire before financing is secured, before Coastal Commission review is complete, or before plan check and tenant improvement work can commence. For applicants who are diligently pursuing a project, this can mean going back through a full Page 81 of 1339 hearing for an approval that everyone agreed was appropriate — just because the timeline slipped due to factors outside their control. I recommend adding an “Exercise of Permit” provision for substantially unchanged approvals where the applicant can demonstrate diligent pursuit. An exercised permit should not require construction commencement as its only metric of progress. I hope my comments are helpful and considered seriously. Other than one item (revocation due to dormancy) I strongly support staff recommendations, with minor tweaks. The refinements I have outlined are not objections to the overall effort in any way but an invitation to go a little further and match the level of review to the level of judgment actually required. A streamlined, predictable process is a win for all stakeholders! Best Regards Jon David Page 82 of 1339 Dear City Council.  Dear Director Nichols Director Nichols said in her 5/12/26 budget presentation related to taxpayer subsidies and program costs that: Our proposed budget reflects a strong position for a Parks and Recreation Department, recovering about 77% of the department costs... This would seem to be a mathematical impossibility.  PARKS & REC FYE26 BUDGET $2,536,857 77%  RECOVERY: 2,536,857 x 77%= $1,952,602.  UNRECOVERED Costs & Subsidies ACCORDING TO Director Nichols 77% calculation: 2,536,857 - $1,952,602 = $584,255  UNRECOVERED P&R SUBSIDIES ACCORDING TO RCS: $1,526,319 RCS Spreadsheet: Thats a million dollar per year discrepancy that needs a better explanation.  Page 83 of 1339 So is it $584,255  or $1,526,319 in unrecovered costs & subsidies? Director Nichols also said in her 5/12 budget presentation that: Additionally, we do have ONE program that's currently operating at a deficit. It is our Park After School program.  By my count, looking at the RCS spreadsheet above its not ONE program operating at a deficit; its 12 of the 14 Programs and a cumulative deficit of $1,526,319 I hope the public gets a better independently verified analysis of Director Nichols cost- subsidy recovery facts, figures & plans before approving any new fees in the Special Events Policy Guide.  Its also reasonable we get an independent audit of the taxpayer subsidies the Parks &  dept will accrue over the next 3 years for each of the 14 items in the spread sheet above.  I leave you with a question. The Parks & Rec have $1.526 million dollars a year in taxpayer subsidies currently.  With your new fee schedule how much of the ~1.526 million in Park Department Subsidies are targeted for recovery for each of the next 3 years for the 14 major programs listed above.  And while some Parks and Rec Subsidies may be justified eg a portion of the Theatre Costs or day care for low to moderate income residents, how much in subsidies should go to non-residents? Shouldn't the council specifically authorize amount of each subsidy and if the that target cant be met get the city out of that business? Every subsidized dollar recovered reduces the General Fund budget deficit by a dollar and I hope the city address this squarely before coming hat in hand asking for a sales tax increase.  Thank you for considering tonyhiggins Page 84 of 1339 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES May 12, 2026 5:00 p.m. Council Chambers 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Members Present: Mayor Mike Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Michael D. Keegan, Councilmember Ray Jackson, Councilmember Dean Francois, Councilmember Rob Saemann Staff Present: City Manager Steve Napolitano, Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore, Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker, City Clerk Martha Alvarez, Interim Deputy City Clerk Ariana Rodriguez, Community Development Director Alison Becker, Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols, Public Works Director Joe SanClemente, Police Chief Landon Phillips _____________________________________________________________________ 1. CLOSED SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 5:00 PM Mayor Detoy called the Closed Session meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Martha Alvarez led roll call. Present: Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Saemann Absent: Councilmember Francois Councilmember Francois arrived at 5:05 p.m. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke: • Jim Holtz (In-Person) Councilmember Francois arrived at the City Council meeting at 5:05 p.m. Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. Page 85 of 1339 2 City Clerk Martha Alvarez led roll call. Present: Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann 4. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION The City Council recessed to Closed Session at 5:05 p.m. 4.a MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on April 14, 2026 4.b CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL (EXISTING LITIGATION) California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1) Name of Case: Koerner v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: 25STCP00891 Name of Case: Everett Faulk v. Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission, et al Case Number: 24STCP04022 4.c PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT / EMPLOYMENT / EVALUATION / DISCIPLINE / DISMISSAL / RELEASE California Government Code section 54957 Title: Direction regarding personnel matters including application of memoranda of understanding, and personnel rules related to displacement and reemployment rights. 4.d CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR California Government Code section 54957.6 City Negotiator: Tyler Cashman, Interim Human Resources Manager Organizations: Professional and Administrative Employee Group and Teamsters, Professional and Medical Employees’ Union, Local 986 5. OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM Mayor Detoy called the Open Session to order at 6:04 p.m. 6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by County of Los Angeles Fire Department (LACoFD), Assistant Fire Chief, Brian Kane. 7. ROLL CALL City Clerk Martha Alvarez led roll call. Page 86 of 1339 3 Present: Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann 8. CLOSED SESSION REPORT Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore reported that the City Council met in Closed Session regarding Koerner v. City of Hermosa Beach, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP00891. The Council voted 4-1 to direct the City Attorney not to file an appeal. 9. ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS Mayor Detoy announced the following upcoming events: the Community-Wide Garage Sale on May 16th from 7:00 AM to noon; Fiesta Hermosa returning Memorial Day weekend, May 23–25, 2026, marking its 50th year as Southern California's largest beachside arts and crafts festival; and Little League playoffs at Clarkfield. The Mayor invited residents to register for the no-fee garage sale permit on the City website and directed the public to fiestahermosa.net for Fiesta information. 10. APPROVAL OF AGENDA This is the time for the City Council to discuss any changes to the order of agenda items. Moved by: Councilmember Saemann Seconded by: Councilmember Francois Motion by Councilember Saemann, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to approve the order of the agenda. Ayes (5): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann Motion Carried 11. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS 11.a RECOGNIZING MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS MONTH Mayor Detoy on behalf of the City Council presented a proclamation declaring May as Mental Health Awareness Month to Beach Cities Health District (BCHD), Volunteer Engagement Coordinator, Alejandra Sierra. Volunteer Engagement Coordinator Sierra spoke on Mental Health Awareness. BCHD Alcove Beach Cities Representatives Chloe and Trevor announced the grand opening of their permanent facility on May 16, 2026, supporting mental health and wellbeing for community members ages 12-25. Page 87 of 1339 4 11.b CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ST. PATRICK’S DAY PARADE POST- EVENT REVIEW Chamber of Commerce President, Michelle Crispin provided the PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions. City Council thanked President Crispin on the report and the Chamber of Commerce efforts on the St. Patrick's Day Parade. 12. PUBLIC COMMENT Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke: • Sarah Harper - Library Programs (In-Person) • County of Los Angeles Fire Department (LACoFD), Assistant Fire Chief, Brian Kane - Continued Fire Services for the City of Hermosa Beach (In- Person) • Jim Holtz - Short Term Rentals (In-Person) • Michelle Hampton- Excessive Speeding (In-Person) • Harris Goodison - Dog Park (In-Person) • Tony Higgins - Agenda Item No. 15.e (Performance Metrics, Accountability, St. Patrick's Day Parade (Virtual) • Falk Underwood - Dog Park (Virtual) • Kristin Moreno - Reduced Speed Limits (Virtual) • Dave H. - Hermosa Beach Police Department Budget (Virtual) • Jim Stevens Dog Park (In-Person) • Ana Haynee - Dog Park (In-Person) Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. 13. CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS No formal comments were made. 14. UPDATES ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITIES Councilmember Ray Jackson reported on the inaugural meeting of the South Bay Housing Trust, formed through the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (COG), comprising 11 cities, and focused on homeless and low-income housing. He further reported that the COG has endorsed a program to replace the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) process. Councilmember Jackson Page 88 of 1339 5 also noted that the Hermosa Valley School girls flag football team, which he co- coaches, concluded its season with a 5–2 record. Mayor Mike Detoy reported on his attendance at the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) General Assembly, highlighting presentations on REAP grant-funded infrastructure investment and the election of Mayor Light as the new Regional Chair. 15. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Detoy requested to move Agenda Item No. 15.d - Amendments to the Hermosa Beach Rotary Club and Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club Agreements to be considered after Municipal Matters. Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Councilmember Saemann, to approve the Consent Calendar Agenda Item Nos. 15.a - 15.f, with the exception of Agenda Item No. 15.d, being removed to be considered after Municipal Matters. Ayes (5): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann Motion Carried 15.a WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann Staff recommends City Council waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived. Motion Carried 15.b CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES (City Clerk Martha Alvarez) Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann To approve the minutes from the April 28, 2026, Regular Meeting and the April 28, 2026, Regular Adjourned Meeting. Page 89 of 1339 6 Motion Carried 15.c CHECK REGISTERS - 26-AS-055 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for April 22, 2026 through April 29, 2026. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands. Motion Carried 15.e REQUEST TO APPROVE JOB SPECIFICATION REVISIONS, JOB SPECIFICATION ADDITIONS, BARGAINING GROUPS AND SALARY RANGES - 26-AS-052 (Human Resources Manager Tyler Cashman) Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann Staff recommends City Council: 1. Approve the revisions for the following job specifications: Senior Account Clerk (Attachment 1), Human Resources Manager (Attachment 2), Human Resources Analyst (Attachment 3), Community Resources Director (Attachment 4), Senior Recreation Supervisor (Attachment 5), and Recreation Specialist (Attachment 6); 2. Approve the establishment of the following new job specifications: Account Specialist (Attachment 7), Lead Account Specialist (Attachment 8), Senior Accountant (Attachment 9), Revenue Services Manager (Attachment 10), Human Resources Technician (Attachment 11), Senior Human Resources Analyst (Attachment 12), Recreation Supervisor (Attachment 13), Parks and Recreation Manager (Attachment 14), and Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst (Attachment 15); 3. Approve the establishment of the five-step salary ranges (Attachment 16) for Account Specialist, Lead Account Specialist, Senior Accountant, Revenue Services Manager, Human Resources Technician, Senior Human Resources Analyst, Recreation Supervisor, Parks and Recreation Manager, and Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst; Page 90 of 1339 7 4. Approve the establishment of Account Specialist and Lead Account Specialist in the General and Supervisory Employees’ Bargaining Unit Teamsters Local 986; 5. Approve the establishment of Senior Accountant, Revenue Services Manager, Recreation Supervisor, Parks and Recreation Manager, and Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst in the Professional and Administrative Employees’ Group; and 6. Approve the establishment of Human Resources Technician and Senior Human Resources Analyst in the Unrepresented Employee Group. Motion Carried 15.f RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING NEW CATEGORY AND FEE FOR COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT AREAS - 26-CMO-027 (Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss) Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann Motion to adopt Resolution No. RES-26-7547 establishing a new category and fee for certain commercial encroachment areas in commercial zones; and amend the Master Fee schedule to reflect the new fee. Motion Carried 16. PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M 16.a RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FROM A FEE STUDY UPDATE - 26- AS-053 (Continued from the April 28, 2026, City Council Meeting) (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation. City Manager Steve Napolitano, Administrative Services Director Walker, and Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore responded to City Council questions. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke: • Tony Higgins (Virtual) • Kent Allen (Virtual Page 91 of 1339 8 • Kathy Knoll (In-Person) • Michelle Crispin (In-Person) • Laura Pena (In-Person) • Eric Horne (In-Person) • Jon David (In-Person) • John Burry (Virtual) • Kristin Moreno (Virtual) Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. Administrative Services Director Walker responded to City Council questions. A motion was made by Councilmember Jackson, to only defer the list of 19 items previously agreed upon at the last meeting, considering the deferred items in a comprehensive study session where all relevant parties could discuss them in detail. The motion failed for lack of a second. A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to add Item S-004 (PDP for Commercial) to the deferred list as the only modification to the original 19 items pulled for further review and postpone the discussion until June 5, 2026. A substitute motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Mayor Detoy, to intended to defer the item S-004 was proposed. Moved by: Mayor Detoy Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson A substitute motion was made by Mayor Detoy, seconded by Councilmember Jackson, to continue the public hearing to June 9, 2026, to apply to the original 19 previously pulled fees plus the addition of fee S- 004. Ayes (4): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Saemann Noes (1): Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 17. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 17.b DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018 (Senior Recreation Supervisor Brian Sousa) Page 92 of 1339 9 This item was considered out of order. Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols provided a brief introduction to the item. Senior Recreation Supervisor Brian Sousa provided the PowerPoint presentation. Senior Recreation Supervisor Sousa, Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore, City Manager Steve Napolitano, and City Clerk Martha Alvarez responded to City Council questions. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments and clarified that due to high volume of public comments, each speaker would have two minutes for public comments. The following individual(s) spoke: • Jack Levy (In-Person) • Carla Buck (In-Person) • Kimm Dunne (In-Person) • Wendy Finster (In-Person) • Jim Stevens (Provided a speaker card but did not speak) • Gina Rossi (In-Person) • Mark Hofstadter (In-Person) • Jeff Miller (In-Person) • William Grow (In-Person) • Roi Robinson (In-Person) • Irina Gaal (In-Person) • Shawn Moonan (In-Person) • Eric Horne (In-Person) • Jim Stevens (Was called again, provided a speaker card but did not speak) • Tony Higgins (Virtual) • Kristin Moreno (Virtual) • Tom Coyle (Virtual) • Laura Pena (In-Person) Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. Page 93 of 1339 10 City Manager Napolitano and Senior Recreation Supervisor Sousa responded to City Council questions. A motion was made by Councilmember Jackson, seconded by Mayor Deoty, to direct staff to proceed with a comprehensive feasibility analysis of the South Park location. Moved by: Councilmember Saemann Seconded by: Councilmember Francois A substitute motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to direct staff to proceed with a comprehensive feasibility analysis of Valley Park East as the primary location and the Greenbelt as a secondary location, and to return with information on a potential ballot measure regarding the Greenbelt location. Ayes (3): Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann Noes (2): Mayor Detoy, and Councilmember Jackson Motion Carried 17.c CONSIDERATION OF INCREASE TO PICKLEBALL MEMBERSHIP AND RESERVATION FEES - 26-PR-025 (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols provided the PowerPoint presentation. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke: • Geraldine Poon (In-Person) Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. City Manager Steve Napolitano, Parks and Recreation Director Nichols, and Senior Recreation Supervisor Brian Sousa responded to City Council questions. Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Councilmember Saemann, to approve Option 2, setting the annual membership rate at $25 and the resident hourly reservation rate at $12 per hour. Page 94 of 1339 11 Ayes (3): Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann Noes (2): Mayor Detoy, and Councilmember Jackson Motion Carried 17.a DEPARTMENT FY 2026-2027 BUDGET PRESENTATIONS - 26-AS-054 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) At 9:32 p.m., the City Council recessed and reconvened at 9:42 p.m. with all City Councilmembers present. City Clerk Martha Alvarez led roll call. Present: Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann City Manager Steve Napolitano provided a brief overview regarding the budget process. Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation. Police Chief Landon Phillips provided the Police Department PowerPoint presentation. City Manager Napolitano and Police Chief Phillips responded to City Council questions. Public Works Director Joseph SanClemente provided the Public Works Department PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions. Parks and Recreations Director Lisa Nichols provided the Parks and Recreation Department PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions. Community Development Director Alison Becker provided the Community Development Department PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions. Senior Management Analyst Sara Russon and Senior Management Analyst Kenneth Bales provided the City Manager's PowerPoint presentation. City Clerk Martha Alvarez provided the City Clerk's Office PowerPoint presentation. Administrative Services Director Walker and City Manager Napolitano concluded the PowerPoint presentation. Page 95 of 1339 12 Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Deoty closed the floor to public comments. Moved by: Mayor Detoy Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan A motion was made by Mayor Detoy, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, to receive and file the FY 2026–2027 Department Budget Presentations. Ayes (5): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann Motion Carried 17.d CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY’S PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE LOS ANGELES COASTAL AREA SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY - 26-CMO-029 (City Manager Steve Napolitano) City Manager Steve Napolitano provided a brief overview and provided clarification. Management Analyst Leo Zalyan provided the PowerPoint presentation. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, to examine the potential benefits and concerns associated with joining the NPS Special Resource Study before making any decision. The motion failed for lack of second. Management Analyst Zalyan responded to City Council questions. Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Mayor Detoy A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Mayor Deoty, to direct staff to participate in the National Park Service Los Angeles Coastal Area Special Resource Study and to return draft comments for City Council review prior to submission. Ayes (3): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Noes (2): Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Saemann Page 96 of 1339 13 Motion Carried 17.e INFORMATIONAL ITEM TO DISCUSS IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR ALCOHOL-SERVING ESTABLISHMENTS - 26- PD-008 Information items are for discussion only. No action will be taken. A City Council majority may request an action item to return at a future meeting. (Police Chief Landon Phillips) Police Chief Landon Phillips provided the PowerPoint presentation. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. Police Chief Phillips responded to City Council questions. Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Councilmember Saemann, to receive and file the informational report. Motion Carried 17.f INFORMATIONAL ITEM REGARDING LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 1942: ELECTRIC BICYCLES: REGISTRATION AND SPECIAL LICENSE PLATES - 26-CMO-024 Information items are for discussion only. No action will be taken. A City Council majority may request an action item to return at a future meeting. (Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo) Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo provided the PowerPoint presentation Senior Management Analyst Russo and City Manager Steve Napolitano responded to City Council questions. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. Moved by: Councilmember Saemann Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, to direct staff to return with a letter of support for AB Page 97 of 1339 14 1942 (Assembly Bill 1942) as currently written as an action item on a future Consent Calendar. Ayes (4): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Saemann Noes (1): Councilmember Francois Motion Carried 15. CONSENT CALENDAR 15.d AMENDMENTS TO THE HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB AND HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB AGREEMENTS - 26-PR-024 (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) This item was removed from the Consent Calendar to be considered after Municipal Matters. Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols provided the staff presentation. Councimember Saemann reported his role as part of the Kiwanis Club and noted no personal financial gain was involved. Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments. Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore, Parks and Recreation Director Nichols, and City Manager Steve Napolitano responded to City Council questions. Moved by: Mayor Detoy Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan A motion made by Mayor Detoy, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, to approve the seventh amendment to the agreement with the Hermosa Beach Rotary Club, approve the first amendment to the agreement with the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club, and authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest both amendments subject to approval by the City Attorney. Ayes (5): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann Motion Carried 18. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Page 98 of 1339 15 Councilmember Jackson requested that a comprehensive review of city speed limits be agendized as an informational item, focusing on major thoroughfares including Hermosa Avenue, 27th Street, Valley Drive, Ardmore Avenue, and Prospect Avenue. City Manager Napolitano indicated staff would evaluate available options under current state authority and report back to Council, noting that Public Works capacity constraints would be a factor. The request received support from Mayor Detoy. 18.a TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 26-CMO-030 Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information. This item was received and filed by order of the Chair. 19. CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager Steve Napolitano reminded the community that City Hall and the Community Center will be closed on Monday, May 25, 2026, in observance of Memorial Day. Street sweeping and parking enforcement along PCH (Pacific Coast Highway), as well as all construction work, will be suspended that day; all other local parking regulations remain in effect, and trash collection will be delayed by one day. 20. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 20.a PARKING CITATIONS AND METERED REVENUE REPORT - APRIL 2026 (Senior Management Analyst Ken Bales) This item was received and filed by order of the Chair. 21. ADJOURNMENT At 12:11 a.m., Mayor Detoy adjourned the meeting to Tuesday, May 26, 2026, a 5:00 p.m. Page 99 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-AS-058 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CHECK REGISTERS (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for May 7, 2026, through May 13, 2026. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands. Attachments: 1. Check Register 5-7-2026 2. Check Register 5-13-2026 Respectfully Submitted by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 100 of 1339 05/07/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 8:26:10AM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111988 5/7/2026 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CO OP 260304 TAXI VOUCHER PROGRAM/MAR2611437 145-3404-4201 1,296.50 145-3853 -48.00 Total : 1,248.5011437 111989 5/7/2026 AM-TEC TOTAL SECURITY INC 647819 REPAIR SIKLU RADIO ISSUE AT LOT C23279 122-8699-4201 1,500.00 Total : 1,500.0023279 111990 5/7/2026 AQUA FLO SI2731750 MR#989989 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES09366 001-6101-4309 206.41 MR#989991 IRRIGATION SUPPLIESSI2736995 001-6101-4309 950.69 MR#989992 IRRIGATION SUPPLIESSI2740482 001-6101-4309 307.86 Total : 1,464.9609366 111991 5/7/2026 ATHENS SERVICES 20899127 CITYWIDE SWEEPING&PORTER SVS/DEC2516660 001-3301-4201 12,634.33 001-3104-4201 18,958.70 001-6101-4201 1,856.26 STEAM CLEANING SVS/DEC2520899127A 001-3301-4201 7,475.02 001-3104-4201 702.22 SCRUBBER SERVICES/DEC2520899127B 001-3301-4201 7,280.99 Total : 48,907.5216660 111992 5/7/2026 ATHENS SERVICES 21501958 PD SHREDDING SERVICE/APR2616660 001-2101-4309 86.67 PD SHREDDING SERVICE/MAY2621699098 001-2101-4309 86.67 Total : 173.3416660 111993 5/7/2026 BEECASSO LIVE BEE REMOVAL INC 5640 BEE REMOVAL ON GREENBELT @8TH ST20705 001-6101-4201 225.00 Total : 225.0020705 Attachment 1Page 101 of 1339 05/07/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 8:26:10AM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 111994 5/7/2026 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS 4509938 MAT REQ 452208 ASPHALT06409 001-3104-4309 333.17 Total : 333.1706409 111995 5/7/2026 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE Acct 4286211111 WATER USAGE - MAR2600016 105-2601-4303 5,121.87 001-6101-4303 26,858.22 001-4204-4303 2,242.87 001-3304-4303 447.74 Total : 34,670.7000016 111996 5/7/2026 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA, INC 6015694569 COPIER MAINT/BASE 3/JAN-APR2610838 001-3302-4305 18.54 COPIER MAINT/PW ADMIN/JAN-APR266015694570 001-1208-4305 217.74 COPIER MAINT/PARKS&REC/JAN-APR266015694571 001-4601-4305 259.67 COPIER MAINT/POLICE DEPT/JAN-APR266015694572 001-2101-4305 280.05 COPIER MAINT/PD RECORDS/JAN-APR266015694573 001-2101-4305 132.52 COPIER MAINT/2ND FL ADMIN/JAN-APR266015694575 001-1208-4305 225.50 COPIER MAINT/COMM DEV/JAN-APR266015694576 001-1208-4305 37.42 Total : 1,171.4410838 111997 5/7/2026 CAPITAL LIGHTING AND ELECTRIC 504726 MR#512095 ELECTRICAL MAINT SUPPLIES21720 105-2601-4309 793.38 Total : 793.3821720 111998 5/7/2026 CDWG AJ11C2H MR#782617 PRINTER TONER/INK09632 001-2101-4305 767.50 Total : 767.5009632 111999 5/7/2026 CEM CONSTRUCTION CORP 26-011 GREENWICH UUAD CONST SVS/MAR2623873 313-8114-4201 217,583.34 Total : 217,583.3423873 112000 5/7/2026 CENTERS OF CA, A MEDICAL CORP, OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH90793740 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 4.23.2623578 Page 102 of 1339 05/07/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 8:26:10AM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 112000 5/7/2026 (Continued)CENTERS OF CA, A MEDICAL CORP, OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH23578 001-1203-4320 218.00 Total : 218.0023578 112001 5/7/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188398601042126 1301 HERMOSA/540 PIER CONNECTION/MAY2620236 001-2101-4304 298.62 Total : 298.6220236 112002 5/7/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188398201042126 1301 HERMOSA/RRC CONNECTION/MAY2620236 001-2101-4304 150.00 Total : 150.0020236 112003 5/7/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188398801042126 CITY HALL CABLE/APR2620236 715-4204-4201 135.63 Total : 135.6320236 112004 5/7/2026 CHILDS, NICOLE PO45600 MULTIPLE CITATION REFUNDS - OVERPAID24115 001-3302 214.00 Total : 214.0024115 112005 5/7/2026 CJ CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC.7146-RET PROJECT RETENTION PYMT23507 115-3104-4201 2,794.75 Total : 2,794.7523507 112006 5/7/2026 CLEAN ENERGY CE12840392 COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS/APR2609694 715-4601-4310 48.00 Total : 48.0009694 112007 5/7/2026 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES C0014193 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES/JUN2620781 001-2202-4251 -348,930.00 001-2202-4251 574,215.00 Total : 225,285.0020781 112008 5/7/2026 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 035192 MAT REQ 805335/FINGERPRINTING/MAR2600364 001-1203-4251 256.00 Total : 256.0000364 112009 5/7/2026 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SL260714 SIGNAL&LIGHTING MAINT/JAN-MAR2600267 105-2601-4251 6,142.03 Page 103 of 1339 05/07/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 8:26:10AM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 6,142.03 112009 5/7/2026 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION00267 112010 5/7/2026 DEWEY PEST CONTROL ACCT 759408 CITYWIDE PEST CONTROL/APR2611449 001-4204-4201 1,060.00 Total : 1,060.0011449 112011 5/7/2026 DEWEY PEST CONTROL ACCT 1233239 SEWER RAT ABATEMENT/APR2611449 160-3102-4201 278.00 Total : 278.0011449 112012 5/7/2026 EL TARASCO PO45589 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT LUNCHEON 5.7.2622360 001-1203-4201 1,725.00 Total : 1,725.0022360 112013 5/7/2026 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 109-1125397 MR#472058 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PARTS22926 715-3302-4311 147.24 Total : 147.2422926 112014 5/7/2026 FLYING LION, INC.3032 DRONE LEASE & FAA REPORTING/MAY2621402 153-2106-4201 1,775.00 Total : 1,775.0021402 112015 5/7/2026 FRANCOIS, DEAN PO45590 REIMB-CAL CITIES POLICY COMMITTEE MEETIN22778 001-1101-4317 69.91 Total : 69.9122778 112016 5/7/2026 FRONTIER 310-318-8751-0128095 CASHIER TAP LINE/MAY2619884 001-1204-4304 102.36 Total : 102.3619884 112017 5/7/2026 GALL, TINA KATCHEN 025-042026 CDBG ADMIN & LABOR COMPLIANCE/APR2622871 001-4202-4201 1,300.00 Total : 1,300.0022871 112018 5/7/2026 GRAINGER 9893360710 DRINKING FOUNTAIN FOR COMM CENTER10836 715-4204-4201 2,084.38 715-4204-4201 200.30 Total : 2,284.6810836 112019 5/7/2026 HB CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PO45602 2026 ST. PATRICK'S DAY PARADE REIMB13932 Page 104 of 1339 05/07/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 8:26:10AM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 112019 5/7/2026 (Continued)HB CHAMBER OF COMMERCE13932 001-3418 26,669.16 Total : 26,669.1613932 112020 5/7/2026 HERC RENTALS 36401654-03 LIFT RENTAL FOR LOT C22725 105-2601-4201 1,625.44 Total : 1,625.4422725 112021 5/7/2026 IPS GROUP INC INV124575 PARKING METER CC FEES/APR2619314 001-3302-4201 19,298.25 001-3304-4201 451.57 001-3305-4201 1,011.56 Total : 20,761.3819314 112022 5/7/2026 LA CO SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT 262532BL MAT REQ 472452 INMATE MEALS/MAR2600151 001-2101-4306 120.31 Total : 120.3100151 112023 5/7/2026 LA UNIFORMS & TAILORING INC 32578 MR#782603 PD UNIFORMS/CERVANTES20771 001-3302-4314 330.17 MR#854366 PD UNIFORMS-NAMEPLATES32651 001-3302-4314 291.72 Total : 621.8920771 112024 5/7/2026 MARQUEZ-VIRAMONTES, MARIA TR1297 PER DIEM - CAPE CONF 5/18-5/22/2622038 001-2101-4317 145.00 Total : 145.0022038 112025 5/7/2026 NUVIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 28691 PICKLEBALL COURT IMPROVEMENTS/NOV25-APR218996 301-8619-4201 4,500.00 Total : 4,500.0018996 112026 5/7/2026 O'BRIEN BENDER, JEANNE 42026 CITY RECORDS ORGANIZATION/APR2622673 001-1121-4201 2,375.00 Total : 2,375.0022673 112027 5/7/2026 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 467709281001 MAT REQ 435428/OFFICE SUPPLIES13114 001-1202-4305 86.35 Total : 86.3513114 Page 105 of 1339 05/07/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 8:26:10AM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 112028 5/7/2026 PARKMOBILE, LLC US032-2026-001223 PAY-BY-APP PARKING FEES/APR2623018 001-3304-4201 1,260.02 001-3305-4201 1,774.82 001-3302-4201 3,755.91 Total : 6,790.7523018 112029 5/7/2026 PEGASUS STUDIOS 1161 VIDEO BROADCASTING SERVICES/APR2623226 001-1121-4201 5,741.57 Total : 5,741.5723226 112030 5/7/2026 PSOMAS 234183 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SVS FOR CIP10613608 301-8106-4201 15,950.00 Total : 15,950.0013608 112031 5/7/2026 RACE COMMUNICATIONS RC2162180 CITY HALL & YARD FIBER INTERNET/MAY2622179 715-1206-4201 2,040.00 Total : 2,040.0022179 112032 5/7/2026 RECWEST OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, INC.20996 MEMORIAL BENCH FOR SANDYA MAGGE20603 001-6101-5402 2,419.00 001-6101-5402 200.36 MEMORIAL BENCH - JIM&JANE GIERLICH21000 001-6101-5402 2,419.00 001-6101-5402 200.36 Total : 5,238.7220603 112033 5/7/2026 RED SECURITY GROUP, LLC 109187 MR#471961 KNOX BOX, KEYS & LOCK13255 715-4204-4201 998.58 MR#512100 LOCKSMITH SERVICES109210 001-4204-4309 150.00 Total : 1,148.5813255 112034 5/7/2026 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 22683 MR#472010 STREET SIGN MAINT SUPPLIES15582 001-3104-4201 1,626.01 MR#472008 STREET SIGN MAINT SUPPLIES22684 001-3104-4201 4,984.12 MR#472009 STREET SIGN MAINT SUPPLIES227422 001-3104-4201 594.36 Total : 7,204.4915582 Page 106 of 1339 05/07/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 8:26:10AM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 112035 5/7/2026 ROBERT HALF 66177819 TEMP STAFFING - CCO - ENDING 5.1.2622419 001-1121-4201 3,040.05 TEMP STAFFING - HR - ENDING 5.1.2666187007 001-1203-4201 3,500.00 Total : 6,540.0522419 112036 5/7/2026 SIERRA ENGINEERING SERVICES HMB1012 ANNUAL AQMD REPORT17830 001-4202-4201 700.00 Total : 700.0017830 112037 5/7/2026 SOCAL GAS 097 904 5900 3 CITY-OWNED BLDGS/NATURAL GAS/MAR2600170 001-4204-4303 151.87 Total : 151.8700170 112038 5/7/2026 SOCAL GAS 102 104 5900 3 CITY-OWNED BLDGS/NATURAL GAS/MAR2600170 001-4204-4303 88.38 Total : 88.3800170 112039 5/7/2026 SOCAL GAS 011 004 5767 8 CITY-OWNED BLDGS/NATURAL GAS/MAR2600170 001-4204-4303 28.62 Total : 28.6200170 112040 5/7/2026 SOCAL GAS 141 204 4600 1 CITY-OWNED BLDGS/NATURAL GAS/MAR2600170 001-4204-4303 22.77 Total : 22.7700170 112041 5/7/2026 SOURCE GRAPHICS INC SG255686 INK CARTRIDGE13761 001-4202-4305 400.00 001-4202-4305 39.00 Total : 439.0013761 112042 5/7/2026 SOUTH BAY FIRE, INC.197638 MR#473102 FIRE EXTINGUISHER ACCESSORIES00113 001-4204-4201 625.58 MR#473101 FIRE EXTINGUISHER REFILLS197643 001-4204-4201 375.97 Total : 1,001.5500113 112043 5/7/2026 SOUTHLAND FIRE ALARM GROUP INC 3155367 REPAIR - FIRE WIRE&PULL BOX @COMM CTR16339 715-4204-4201 1,640.00 Page 107 of 1339 05/07/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 8:26:10AM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 1,640.00 112043 5/7/2026 SOUTHLAND FIRE ALARM GROUP INC16339 112044 5/7/2026 SPECIALIZED ELEVATOR SERVICES 96936 PARKING STRUCTURE ELEVATOR MAINT/MAY2621538 001-3304-4201 230.84 CITY HALL ELEVATOR MAINT/MAY2696937 001-4204-4201 222.62 Total : 453.4621538 112045 5/7/2026 TIREHUB LLC 58339301 MR#472059 VEHICLE TIRES21146 715-2101-4311 576.56 Total : 576.5621146 112046 5/7/2026 T-MOBILE Acct 954297746 PW/CDD/CMO CELL PHONES/TABLETS/APR2619082 001-1201-4304 51.54 001-4201-4304 213.84 001-4202-4304 833.10 Total : 1,098.4819082 112047 5/7/2026 T-MOBILE Acct 217007781 PW&CDD TABLETS/APR2619082 001-4202-4304 131.04 001-4201-4304 43.68 Total : 174.7219082 112048 5/7/2026 T-MOBILE Acct 267037374 PARKS&REC CELL PHONES/APR2619082 001-4601-4304 139.75 Total : 139.7519082 112049 5/7/2026 T-MOBILE Acct 946625962 PD RECORDS/WATCH COMMAND/CELLS/APR2619082 001-2101-4304 81.40 Total : 81.4019082 112050 5/7/2026 TORRANCE AUTO PARTS ACCT 2250 AUTO REPAIR/MAINTENANCE PARTS/APR2616735 715-2101-4311 1,017.70 715-3302-4311 341.04 715-4202-4311 57.72 001-2021 22.92 001-2022 -22.92 Total : 1,416.4616735 112051 5/7/2026 TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC 20263018-3026 ENGINEERING SUPPORT SVS/MAR2615901 Page 108 of 1339 05/07/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 8:26:10AM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 112051 5/7/2026 (Continued)TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC15901 001-4202-4201 16,043.80 Total : 16,043.8015901 112052 5/7/2026 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC 045-560243 ERP SOFTWARE CONVERSION 4.6&4.9.2605626 715-1206-4201 2,608.00 ERP SOFTWARE CONVERSION 4.12-4.15.26045-560745 715-1206-4201 5,216.00 Total : 7,824.0005626 112053 5/7/2026 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 420260349 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERTS/APR2608207 160-3102-4201 96.00 Total : 96.0008207 112054 5/7/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73667301 VOIP PHONES/CITY HALL&PD/MAR2618666 001-1101-4304 12.91 001-1121-4304 45.18 001-1132-4304 12.91 001-1141-4304 25.82 001-1201-4304 122.62 001-1202-4304 77.45 001-1203-4304 70.99 001-1204-4304 83.90 001-1208-4304 6.45 001-2101-4304 425.95 001-4101-4304 83.90 001-4201-4304 109.71 001-4202-4304 180.71 160-3102-4201 12.91 715-1206-4304 19.35 Total : 1,290.7618666 112055 5/7/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73667966 VOIP PHONES/PW YARD/MAR2618666 001-4202-4304 119.52 Total : 119.5218666 112056 5/7/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73667304 VOIP PHONES/PARKS&REC/MAR2618666 001-4601-4304 117.02 Total : 117.0218666 Page 109 of 1339 05/07/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 8:26:10AM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 112057 5/7/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73667960 VOIP PHONES/BASE 3/MAR2618666 001-3302-4304 66.80 Total : 66.8018666 112058 5/7/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73667954 VOIP PHONES/BARD/MAR2618666 001-3302-4304 51.12 Total : 51.1218666 112059 5/7/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73667306 VOIP PHONES/EOC/MAR2618666 001-1201-4304 40.44 Total : 40.4418666 112060 5/7/2026 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73668166 VOIP PHONES/CHA/MAR2618666 001-1201-4304 11.58 Total : 11.5818666 112061 5/7/2026 VERIZON WIRELESS 6141217290 PD TRUNK MODEMS/APR2603209 153-2106-4201 1,040.30 Total : 1,040.3003209 112062 5/7/2026 WEATHERPROOFING TECHNOLOGIES 98471896 14TH ST RESTROOM ROOF RENOVATION22726 001-4204-4201 13,890.00 Total : 13,890.0022726 3511863 4/22/2026 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET 111866376 VEHICLE FUEL 3/10/26-4/9/2610668 715-2101-4310 4,236.13 715-4204-4310 490.84 715-4206-4310 250.88 715-6101-4310 607.31 715-3104-4310 441.91 715-4202-4310 284.01 001-1250 106.92 715-3302-4310 1,882.60 Total : 8,300.6010668 22960327 4/23/2026 CALPERS FISCAL SERVICES DIV 100000018273802 REPLACEMENT BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION - 202615230 001-2101-4184 1,118.16 Total : 1,118.1615230 26373813 4/30/2026 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES ACCT ENDING 5596 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/APR2603432 Page 110 of 1339 05/07/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 8:26:10AM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 26373813 4/30/2026 (Continued)HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES03432 001-4204-4309 1,242.81 001-3304-4309 26.74 001-3104-4201 1,135.07 001-3104-4309 2,043.11 001-6101-4309 374.97 001-4204-4309 364.39 001-6101-4201 143.77 715-4204-4201 843.42 715-4206-4309 475.23 001-2021 123.74 001-2022 -123.74 Total : 6,649.5103432 Bank total : 725,354.39 78 Vouchers for bank code :boa 725,354.39Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 78 Page 111 of 1339 05/13/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 3:48:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 112063 5/13/2026 ABRIGO, MEGAN PO44821 CITATION (31040283) REFUND - OVERPAID23943 001-3302 68.00 Total : 68.0023943 112064 5/13/2026 AED BRANDS LLC 197072 AEDS FOR PD & COMM SVS23796 715-2101-4201 17,000.00 715-3302-4201 17,000.00 715-2101-4201 1,657.50 715-3302-4201 1,657.50 Total : 37,315.0023796 112065 5/13/2026 ALL AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION 25-33.06 KELLY COURT IMPROVEMENTS/APR2623965 301-8619-4201 18,808.60 Total : 18,808.6023965 112066 5/13/2026 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT PS-INV105702 CROSSING GUARD SERVICE/4.12-4.25.2606827 146-2102-4201 18,700.47 Total : 18,700.4706827 112067 5/13/2026 AT&T 960 461-1985 555 7 PD COMPUTER CIRCUITS/MAY2600321 001-2101-4304 250.70 Total : 250.7000321 112068 5/13/2026 ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS Req 46 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS/APR26A23101 705-1217-4324 13,135.38 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS/APR26BReq 47 705-1217-4324 18,848.74 Total : 31,984.1223101 112069 5/13/2026 AVILA, PAUL PO45627 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT/SPRING2623877 001-1204-4317 2,520.00 Total : 2,520.0023877 112070 5/13/2026 BADGE BEHAVIOR Y327060 TUITION-IMPLICIT BIAS COURSE17428 001-2101-4313 150.00 Total : 150.0017428 112071 5/13/2026 BEVINS, RIAN PO42435 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT REFUND23474 001-3843 175.00 Attachment 2Page 112 of 1339 05/13/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 3:48:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 175.00 112071 5/13/2026 BEVINS, RIAN23474 112072 5/13/2026 BOB BARKER COMPANY, INC.INV2233083 JAIL MATERIALS08763 001-2101-4306 215.20 001-2101-4306 19.22 Total : 234.4208763 112073 5/13/2026 CALEA INV46470 ON-SITE FEE ASSESSMENT14465 001-2101-4201 364.25 Total : 364.2514465 112074 5/13/2026 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 7641 MR#973917 NAMESTAMP/ALVAREZ00262 001-1101-4305 38.41 Total : 38.4100262 112075 5/13/2026 CAPITAL LIGHTING AND ELECTRIC 505178 MR#512096 ELECTRICAL MAINT SUPPLIES21720 715-4204-4201 953.78 MR#512098 ELECTRICAL MAINT SUPPLIES505306 715-4204-4201 963.12 Total : 1,916.9021720 112076 5/13/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 241350501050126 HD PEG CHANNEL/MAY2620236 715-1206-4201 636.00 Total : 636.0020236 112077 5/13/2026 CLUB RHYTHMIC LLC PO45637 INSTRUCTOR PYMT CLASSES THRU 5.6.2624113 001-4601-4221 890.91 Total : 890.9124113 112078 5/13/2026 COLLINS, DENNIS L.PO45638 INSTRUCTOR PYMT CLASSES THRU 5.3.2605970 001-4601-4221 5,168.54 Total : 5,168.5405970 112079 5/13/2026 COUNTRY HILLS ANIMAL CLINIC 2469 K9 ARCO MED SVS - INJURY 5.5.2623991 170-2105-4201 1,215.75 Total : 1,215.7523991 112080 5/13/2026 DANIEL, JOEL Parcel 4169 037 025 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE/202510702 001-6871 147.35 105-3105 24.61 Page 113 of 1339 05/13/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 3:48:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 171.96 112080 5/13/2026 DANIEL, JOEL10702 112081 5/13/2026 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION PO45606 STRONG MOTION MAP FEES OCT23-JUN2500049 001-3204 10,190.54 Total : 10,190.5400049 112082 5/13/2026 DEWEY PEST CONTROL ACCT 1553576 TERMITE CONTROL-PD RANGE&OFFICE11449 001-4204-4201 4,950.00 TERMITE CONTROL-PD STORAGE RMACCT 1553586 001-4204-4201 3,200.00 Total : 8,150.0011449 112083 5/13/2026 DTA PUBLIC FINANCE, INC.2603263 ENG REP-FY27 SEWER LEVY/MAR2623629 160-3102-4201 1,048.03 Total : 1,048.0323629 112084 5/13/2026 EASY READER STMT 5833 MAT REQ 472853 LEGAL ADS/APR2600181 001-1121-4323 1,430.64 Total : 1,430.6400181 112085 5/13/2026 EMERGENCY RESPONSE CRIME SCENE T2026-285 CLEAN & SANITIZE JAIL 4.10.2616922 001-2101-4201 850.00 CLEAN & SANITIZE JAIL 4.11.26T2026-287 001-2101-4201 2,550.00 CLEAN & SANITIZE JAIL 4.12.26T2026-288 001-2101-4201 850.00 CLEAN & SANITIZE JAIL 4.13.26T2026-289 001-2101-4201 2,550.00 CLEAN & SANITIZE JAIL 4.15.26T2026-294 001-2101-4201 1,300.00 CLEAN & SANITIZE PD VEHICLE 4.15.26T2026-295 001-2101-4201 650.00 CLEANING SERVICE 4.30.26T2026-324 001-2101-4201 2,550.00 Total : 11,300.0016922 112086 5/13/2026 EVANS, MARLIN K.PO45640 INSTRUCTOR PYMT CLASS 1232015059 001-4601-4221 103.73 Total : 103.7315059 Page 114 of 1339 05/13/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 3:48:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 112087 5/13/2026 EXPRESS ENVIRONMENTAL CORP 2605007 HAZARDOUS WASTE PAINT REMOVAL08625 001-3104-4201 695.00 Total : 695.0008625 112088 5/13/2026 FEDEX OFFICE 101600021985 MR#973919 CERTIFICATE PRINTING SVS06293 001-1101-4305 7.86 MR#435427 BUS CARDS-CASHMAN101600030396 001-1203-4305 31.01 MR#973919 CERTIFICATE PRINTING SVS101600080380 001-1101-4305 1.59 MR#806549 PRINTING SERVICES/BANNERS101600090767 001-4601-4302 218.27 MR#973919 CERTIFICATE PRINTING SVS101600123690 001-1101-4305 1.59 MR#973919 CERTIFICATE PRINTING SVS101600142519 001-1101-4305 3.18 Total : 263.5006293 112089 5/13/2026 FIJALKA ENGINEERING, PC 109 CIP114 ENGINEERING SERVICES/APR2624085 313-8114-4201 712.50 Total : 712.5024085 112090 5/13/2026 FRANCOIS, DEAN PO45620 MILEAGE REIMB FOR CERRITOS EVENT22778 001-1101-4305 29.87 Total : 29.8722778 112091 5/13/2026 FRONTIER 310-318-0113-1203155 EOC ANALOG LINES/MAY2619884 715-1206-4304 1,570.27 Total : 1,570.2719884 112092 5/13/2026 GILBERT, LYNNE ROSENBERG PO44831 CITATION (30022377-78) REFUND - OVERPAID22449 001-3302 151.00 Total : 151.0022449 112093 5/13/2026 GRUBER AND LOPEZ, INC.4962 AUDIT SERVICES FOR FY24/2521478 001-1202-4201 32,602.55 001-1202-4201 2,550.00 Total : 35,152.5521478 112094 5/13/2026 GUILLEN, JESSICA PO43567 PER DIEM - PEER SUPPORT TRAINING22893 Page 115 of 1339 05/13/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 3:48:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 112094 5/13/2026 (Continued)GUILLEN, JESSICA22893 001-2101-4313 75.00 Total : 75.0022893 112095 5/13/2026 HINES, PAIGE PO44832 CITATION (33024561) REFUND - OVERPAID23945 001-3302 83.00 Total : 83.0023945 112096 5/13/2026 HKA ELEVATOR CONSULTING, INC.00353543 LOT C ELEVATOR MODERNIZATION SVS23148 301-8699-4201 1,075.00 Total : 1,075.0023148 112097 5/13/2026 HOBELMAN, GUILLERMO PO45622 TR1290 CLOSEOUT-ICC LEADERSHIP WEEK23371 001-4201-4317 3,635.56 Total : 3,635.5623371 112098 5/13/2026 HOGAN, ARACELI PO44803 CIT#43029970 REFUND - CERT OF CORRECTION23936 001-3302 28.00 Total : 28.0023936 112099 5/13/2026 IPS GROUP INC INV125273 PARKING METER REPLACEMENT PARTS19314 001-3302-4201 2,743.75 Total : 2,743.7519314 112100 5/13/2026 JOE SILVA PHOTOGRAPHY PO45611 ADMIN CITE 7851 DISMISSED24119 001-3305 1,000.00 Total : 1,000.0024119 112101 5/13/2026 JOL DESIGN 5.12.26 MR#939333 P.A.R.K. STAFF JACKETS12162 001-4601-4201 900.50 MR#939332 DAY CAMP T-SHIRTS5.12.26 001-4601-4201 2,265.68 Total : 3,166.1812162 112102 5/13/2026 KLOSTERMAN, KENNETH Parcel 4188 020 022 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE/202514519 001-6871 147.35 105-3105 24.61 Total : 171.9614519 112103 5/13/2026 LA COUNTY REGISTRAR RECORDER PO45629 CIP 107 CEQA NOTICE OF EXEMPTION22615 Page 116 of 1339 05/13/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 3:48:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 112103 5/13/2026 (Continued)LA COUNTY REGISTRAR RECORDER22615 001-4202-4305 25.00 Total : 25.0022615 112104 5/13/2026 LAURA MECOY COMMUNICATIONS LLC 2506 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER SVS/APR2620347 001-1201-4201 7,200.00 Total : 7,200.0020347 112105 5/13/2026 LEARNED LUMBER ACCT 1126 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/APR2600167 001-6101-4309 734.82 Total : 734.8200167 112106 5/13/2026 MAGNUM VENTURE PARTNERS PO45648 INSTRUCTOR PYMT CLASSES THRU 5.9.2618274 001-4601-4221 7,649.09 Total : 7,649.0918274 112107 5/13/2026 MCDERMOTT, GARRETT PO45613 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT16613 001-2101-4317 428.48 Total : 428.4816613 112108 5/13/2026 NV5, INC 512497 CONST MGMT&INSPECTION SVS/MAR2621033 313-8114-4201 30,523.00 Total : 30,523.0021033 112109 5/13/2026 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 464548139001 MAT REQ 939329/OFFICE SUPPLIES13114 001-4601-4328 65.83 MAT REQ 473292/OFFICE SUPPLIES467290523001 001-4202-4305 85.74 Total : 151.5713114 112110 5/13/2026 OLIVERI, CANDISE PO45623 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT-WINTER2623195 001-1204-4317 138.00 Total : 138.0023195 112111 5/13/2026 OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 14737 VEHICLE REPAIR-PW TOYOTA HIGHLANDER00093 715-4206-4201 3,511.73 MR#472064 AUTO REPAIR HB314741 715-2101-4311 635.59 Total : 4,147.3200093 Page 117 of 1339 05/13/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 3:48:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 112112 5/13/2026 PARS 60335 ALT RETIREMENT PLAN ADMIN FEES/MAR2614693 001-2101-4185 15.72 001-4201-4185 153.25 001-4202-4185 27.51 Total : 196.4814693 112113 5/13/2026 PHELPS, JUSTIN TR1305 PER DIEM - FIREARMS COURSE 5/18-19/2623003 001-2101-4317 100.00 Total : 100.0023003 112114 5/13/2026 PHILLIPS, LANDON TR1299 SUCCESSION PRESENTATION - OHIO PD 5/19-211574 001-2101-4317 110.00 Total : 110.0011574 112115 5/13/2026 PINEDA, LUIS TR1212 PER DIEM - ICI FINANCIAL CRIMES20016 001-2101-4317 225.00 REIMB-HOTEL SECURITY DEPOSITTR1212 001-2101-4317 100.00 Total : 325.0020016 112116 5/13/2026 PITNEY BOWES INC 3107883991 POSTAGE METER RENTAL/APR-JUN2613838 715-1208-4201 602.22 Total : 602.2213838 112117 5/13/2026 PROPERTY HEALTH, INC.268091 ASBESTOS&PAINT TESTING @LAWN BOWLING BLD24033 001-4202-4201 1,800.00 Total : 1,800.0024033 112118 5/13/2026 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY CUST 1275405 YARD UNIFORMS, TOWELS, & MATS/APR2617676 001-2101-4309 77.06 001-3104-4309 86.92 001-3302-4309 69.36 001-4202-4314 404.26 001-4204-4309 156.20 715-4206-4309 54.00 Total : 847.8017676 112119 5/13/2026 RECWEST OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, INC.21023 MEMORIAL BENCH FOR THOMAS MORTIMER20603 001-6101-5402 2,562.50 001-6101-5402 213.96 Page 118 of 1339 05/13/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 3:48:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 2,776.46 112119 5/13/2026 RECWEST OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, INC.20603 112120 5/13/2026 RED SECURITY GROUP, LLC 108722 MR#471959 LOCKSMITH SERVICES13255 001-4204-4309 55.00 MR#512097 ADA PUSH BUTTON109211 715-4204-4201 206.33 Total : 261.3313255 112121 5/13/2026 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF 584996 CITY PROSECUTOR SERVICES/APR2603282 001-1132-4201 18,444.00 Total : 18,444.0003282 112122 5/13/2026 RJ PRINTING & PROMOTIONAL 1354 INSPECTION NOTICE CARDS21153 001-4201-4305 976.16 Total : 976.1621153 112123 5/13/2026 ROCHA, KIMBERLY TR1306 PER DIEM - FIREARMS COURSE 5/18-19/2622966 001-2101-4317 100.00 Total : 100.0022966 112124 5/13/2026 SAFEWAY INC VONS ACCT 150882 P.A.R.K. SUPPLIES/APR2616425 001-4601-4308 38.39 Total : 38.3916425 112125 5/13/2026 SAGECREST PLANNING AND ENVIRON 5743 ZONING CODE CONSULTANT SVS/APR2621406 001-4105-4201 6,045.00 Total : 6,045.0021406 112126 5/13/2026 SBCU VISA PO456147 A BECKER CC STATEMENT - APR2603353 001-4201-4315 740.67 001-4101-4305 39.54 001-4101-4317 1,012.27 E CAHALAN CC STATEMENT - APR26PO45615 001-2101-4201 64.64 001-2101-4306 2,747.66 001-2101-4317 242.17 001-3302-4317 1,406.32 J SANCLEMENTE CC STATEMENT - APR26PO45616 001-4202-4305 14.33 001-4202-4317 750.00 Page 119 of 1339 05/13/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 3:48:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount 112126 5/13/2026 (Continued)SBCU VISA03353 B WALKER CC STATEMENT - APR26PO45625 001-1203-4201 15.15 001-1203-4315 390.00 001-1203-4317 1,350.00 J CORDOVA CC STATEMENT - APR26PO45635 001-3104-4309 91.19 001-3304-4309 48.93 001-3304-4201 245.84 715-3302-4311 119.60 001-6101-4309 679.01 715-2101-4311 62.55 001-4204-4201 508.92 001-3104-4201 150.51 001-4202-4305 112.10 001-6101-4201 1,250.14 A YANG CC STATEMENT - APR26PO46524 001-1101-4305 527.97 001-1101-4319 19.89 001-1201-4305 660.20 001-1201-4317 125.00 001-1121-4305 65.93 001-1121-4317 1,100.00 001-1121-4201 1,080.00 715-1206-4201 1,045.19 Total : 16,665.7203353 112127 5/13/2026 SCOTT, CARL PO42597 CITATION (43023669) REFUND - OVERPAID23516 001-3302 83.00 Total : 83.0023516 112128 5/13/2026 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CUST 4251-1921-1 PAINTING SUPPLIES/APR2617903 001-4204-4309 72.50 Total : 72.5017903 112129 5/13/2026 SLATER WATERPROOFING, INC.4810 LOT C IMPROVEMENTS/MAR2623382 122-8699-4201 75,601.00 190-8699-4201 596,682.51 Page 120 of 1339 05/13/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 3:48:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 672,283.51 112129 5/13/2026 SLATER WATERPROOFING, INC.23382 112130 5/13/2026 SMART & FINAL ACCT 322063 REFRESHMENTS&CLEANING SUPPLIES/APR2600114 001-1101-4305 6.99 001-2101-4306 236.77 Total : 243.7600114 112131 5/13/2026 SOCAL GAS 170-781-3287 9 YARD CNG STATION/APR2600170 715-3104-4310 56.28 715-4204-4310 56.28 715-6101-4310 56.28 Total : 168.8400170 112132 5/13/2026 SOURCE GRAPHICS INC SG1236774 CARTRIDGE&CLEANING KIT FOR PLOTTER13761 001-4202-4305 418.60 001-4202-4305 38.34 Total : 456.9413761 112133 5/13/2026 SOUTH BAY FIRE, INC.197628 MR#925869 FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE00113 001-4204-4201 181.46 Total : 181.4600113 112134 5/13/2026 SRK PROMOTIONAL ADVERTISING 5403 BACKDROP FOR WTF EVENTS15398 001-3302-4201 393.80 001-3302-4201 62.41 Total : 456.2115398 112135 5/13/2026 STANLEY STEEMER OF LA COUNTY 1058378 AIR DUCT CLEANING FOR CITY HALL10493 715-4204-4201 8,450.00 AIR DUCT CLEANING FOR POLICE DEPT1058380 715-4204-4201 8,600.00 Total : 17,050.0010493 112136 5/13/2026 SWISH ACADEMY INC.PO45656 INSTRUCTOR PYMT CLASSES THRU 5.3.2623957 001-4601-4221 1,622.10 Total : 1,622.1023957 112137 5/13/2026 TANABE, SEAN TR1295 SUCCESSION PRESENTATION - OHIO PD 5/19-219956 001-2101-4317 110.00 Page 121 of 1339 05/13/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 3:48:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 110.00 112137 5/13/2026 TANABE, SEAN19956 112138 5/13/2026 TARANGO, CHERYL Parcel 4184 019 027 SEWER & STREET LIGHT TAX REBATE/202511818 001-6871 147.35 105-3105 24.61 Total : 171.9611818 112139 5/13/2026 TORRES, IVAN TR1307 PER DIEM - FIREARMS COURSE 5/18-19/2623002 001-2101-4317 100.00 Total : 100.0023002 112140 5/13/2026 TURBODATA SYSTEMS, INC.48565 CITATION PROCESSING/APR2620670 001-1204-4201 7,845.57 PERMIT PROCESSING&CLOUD HOSTING/APR2648566 001-1204-4201 1,300.00 Total : 9,145.5720670 112141 5/13/2026 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC 045-561440 ERP SOFTWARE CONV 4.14&4.21-22.2605626 715-1206-4201 3,912.00 ERP SOFTWARE CONVERSION 4.23.26045-561441 715-1206-4201 652.00 Total : 4,564.0005626 112142 5/13/2026 VALENCIA, DAVID PO42624 CIT#34034195/36017085 REFUND-OVERPAID23529 001-3302 151.00 Total : 151.0023529 112143 5/13/2026 VAZQUEZSALAS, RAFAEL PO43586 CITATION (44017957) REFUND - VOIDED23700 001-3302 68.00 Total : 68.0023700 112144 5/13/2026 WITTMAN ENTERPRISES LLC 202603-C1804 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT BILLING/MAR2613359 001-1202-4201 4,072.81 Total : 4,072.8113359 112145 5/13/2026 YOUNG, JONATHAN PO45626 TR1259 CLOSEOUT - AXON WEEK21283 001-3302-4317 85.00 SUCCESSION PRESENTATION - OHIO PD 5/19-2TR1296 001-2101-4317 110.00 Page 122 of 1339 05/13/2026 Check Register CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12 3:48:04PM Page: Bank code :boa Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 195.00 112145 5/13/2026 YOUNG, JONATHAN21283 112146 5/13/2026 ZUBER, BRENT TR1183 PER DIEM - USE OF FORCE TRAINING21393 001-2101-4312 150.00 PARKING REIMBURSEMENTTR1183 001-2101-4317 30.00 PER DIEM - FIREARMS COURSE 5/18-19/26TR1308 001-2101-4317 100.00 Total : 280.0021393 Bank total : 1,015,147.61 84 Vouchers for bank code :boa 1,015,147.61Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 84 Page 123 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-AS-057 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CASH BALANCE REPORT (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the March 2026 Cash Balance Report. Executive Summary: The Cash Balance Report provides a summary of the beginning and ending cash balances for all funds during the specific period. Attachments: March 2026 Cash Balance Report Respectfully Submitted by: Anna Bailey, Accountant Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Concur: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 124 of 1339 GENERAL ACCOUNT FUND 2/28/2026 3/31/2026 NUMBER FUND NAME BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENTS CHECKS ADJUSTMENTS BALANCE 001 GENERAL $13,526,986.00 $3,174,501.09 ($2,636,134.48)($1,538,073.06)($522,358.78)$12,004,920.77 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING $96,826.54 $13,768.65 ($64,059.60)(2,454.83)$44,080.76 115 STATE GAS TAX $577,958.26 $84,688.04 ($31,901.14)(1,010.43)$629,734.73 117 AB939 $213,114.98 $3,378.20 $329.91 $216,823.09 122 TYCO $1,365,806.88 $2,061.55 (12,969.40)$1,354,899.03 125 PARK REC FAC TAX $133,609.22 $114.19 (58,677.66)$75,045.75 135 BAYVIEW DRIVE DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $7,206.38 $10.98 $7,217.36 138 LOMA DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $24.06 $0.03 $24.09 139 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $1,794.42 $2.74 $1,797.16 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT $1.38 $1.38 145 PROPOSITION A $413,054.05 $37,714.54 $685.15 ($1,153.47)$450,300.27 146 PROPOSITION C $944,289.79 $31,283.22 ($844.70)(594.13)$974,134.18 147 MEASURE R $532,524.56 $23,453.83 $614.98 (73.10)$556,520.27 148 MEASURE M $284,409.72 $26,470.50 $473.73 $311,353.95 149 MEASURE W $1,159,765.60 $170.74 (415.49)$1,159,520.85 150 GRANTS $775,611.79 $775,611.79 152 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT $154,846.60 ($179.71)(35.01)$154,631.88 153 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES $704,661.05 $1,021.72 ($34,182.70)$671,500.07 157 FEMA/CalOES $20,991.38 $20,991.38 158 CARES ACT $0.35 $0.35 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE $2,350,405.49 $11,002.72 ($31,308.51)($3,160.06)(6,755.81)$2,320,183.83 161 STORM DRAIN FUND $2,406,931.03 $26,135.35 ($123,072.82)(8,448.26)$2,301,545.30 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE $569,505.88 $849.77 ($11,868.20)$558,487.45 180 FIRE PROTECTION $22,534.60 $511.64 $35.09 $23,081.33 190 RTI UNDERSEA CABLE $1,184,940.05 ($4,253.13)($190,837.62)(1,535.58)$988,313.72 191 RTI UNDERSEA CABLE TIDELANDS $314,874.91 $479.83 $315,354.74 201 2015 LEASE REVENUE BONDS $9,817.85 $119,178.39 ($119,178.39)$9,817.85 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $12,424,078.41 $192,812.92 ($175,241.54)($393,276.16)(6,250.11)$12,042,123.52 313 GREENWICH VILLAGE UTILITY UNDERGROUND ($540,315.61)($246,726.19)($787,041.80) 609 BAYVIEW DRIVE REDEMPTION ($17,590.44)($17,590.44) 610 LOWER PIER DISTRICT REDEMPTION $98.36 $0.16 $98.52 611 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT REDEMPTION $63.62 $0.10 $63.72 612 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESERVE $5,364.10 $8.18 $5,372.28 617 MYRTLE AVE ASSESSMENT FUND ($0.42)($0.42) 618 LOMA DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND $0.31 $0.31 619 BAYVIEW DRIVE DISTRICT RESERVE $17,607.84 $26.84 $17,634.68 623 GREENWICH BOND RESERVE $58,405.30 $58,405.30 624 GREENWICH BOND REDEMPTION $164,045.92 (101,535.65)$62,510.27 705 INSURANCE $10,029,062.30 $22,903.36 $402,850.88 (63,481.35)(767.38)$10,390,567.81 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $7,985,815.00 $10,421.08 $124,706.40 ($137,645.18)($5,291.96)$7,978,005.34 TOTAL GENERAL ACCOUNT $57,899,127.51 $55,676,042.42 BALANCE BALANCE ACCOUNTS 2/28/2026 DEPOSITS CHARGES 3/31/2026 PAYROLL $20,785.20 $2,928,262.08 ($2,258,893.50)$690,153.78 CABLE TV DEPOSIT $16,763.73 $16,763.73 $37,548.93 $2,928,262.08 ($2,258,893.50)$706,917.51 TOTAL ALL ACCOUNTS $56,382,959.93 BANK BALANCES INVESTMENTS GENERAL $7,354,026.03 $48,586,550.83 TRUST ACCOUNTS $723,041.42 $8,077,067.45 OUTSTANDING CHECKS ($280,658.35) INTEREST COLLECTED $7,796,409.10 FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2026 INVESTMENTS $48,586,550.83 $54,603.20 BALANCE $56,382,959.93 APPROVED : BRANDON WALKER, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR CASH BALANCE REPORT MARCH 2026 Page 125 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-AS-059 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR MARCH 2026 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the March 2026 Financial Reports. Executive Summary: Attached are the March 2026 Revenue and Expenditure reports. The reports provide detail by revenue account and by department for expenditures, with summaries by fund at the end of each report. Discussion: As of March 2026, General Fund revenue is 65.0 percent received for 75.0 percent of the fiscal year. The General Fund revenue, particularly tax revenue, is not received incrementally. The total would reach 76.1 percent when adjusting for tax revenue. General Fund expenditures are 77.2 percent expended for 75.0 percent of the fiscal year. Expenditures do not necessarily occur on an incremental basis. The total would reach 71.7 percent when adjusting for encumbrances. The Capital Improvement Project (CIP) reports group the funding for each project together, which is similar to how the projects are shown in the budget. In the regular Expenditure Report, the CIPs appear at the end of each fund; therefore, the total funding is not displayed in one place. Attachments: 1. March 2026 Revenue Report 2. March 2026 Expenditure Report 3. March 2026 CIP Report Respectfully Submitted by: Charlotte Newkirk, Senior Finance Analyst Concur: Anna Bailey, Accountant Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 126 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 21,383,348.00 0.00 11,743,022.82 9,640,325.18 54.92 3102 Current Year Unsecured 678,086.00 43,781.92 701,498.96 -23,412.96 103.45 3103 Prior Year Collections 214,000.00 26,691.47 233,340.99 -19,340.99 109.04 3106 Supplemental Roll SB813 300,000.00 28,949.71 252,252.17 47,747.83 84.08 3107 Transfer Tax 320,000.00 32,318.00 238,337.01 81,662.99 74.48 3108 Sales Tax 3,640,000.00 278,074.74 2,367,173.36 1,272,826.64 65.03 3109 1/2 Cent Sales Tx Ext 288,542.00 31,561.13 172,000.11 116,541.89 59.61 3110 Spectrum Cable TV Franchise 150,000.00 0.00 63,167.78 86,832.22 42.11 3111 Electric Franchise 179,173.00 0.00 0.00 179,173.00 0.00 3112 Gas Franchise 45,770.00 0.00 0.00 45,770.00 0.00 3113 Refuse Franchise 560,000.00 38,452.84 469,107.66 90,892.34 83.77 3114 Transient Occupancy Tax 5,190,000.00 503,068.09 3,157,825.43 2,032,174.57 60.84 3115 Business License 1,215,000.00 71,296.14 844,894.66 370,105.34 69.54 3120 Utility User Tax 2,513,044.00 248,713.16 1,966,515.89 546,528.11 78.25 3122 Property tax In-lieu of Veh Lic Fees 4,017,182.00 0.00 2,008,591.00 2,008,591.00 50.00 3123 Frontier Cable Franchise Fee 60,000.00 11,576.59 23,613.33 36,386.67 39.36 Total Taxes 59.48 40,754,145.00 1,314,483.79 24,241,341.17 16,512,803.83 3200 Licenses And Permits 3202 Dog Licenses 34,000.00 670.00 27,416.00 6,584.00 80.64 3204 Building Permits 690,000.00 49,024.57 542,153.76 147,846.24 78.57 3205 Electric Permits 140,000.00 7,575.00 105,147.40 34,852.60 75.11 1Page: Page 127 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3206 Plumbing Permits 80,000.00 5,174.00 59,639.10 20,360.90 74.55 3207 Occupancy Permits 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 3209 Garage Sales 100.00 0.00 96.00 4.00 96.00 3211 Banner Permits 1,500.00 284.00 1,165.00 335.00 77.67 3213 Animal Redemption Fee 0.00 0.00 126.00 -126.00 0.00 3214 Amplified Sound Permit 7,311.00 856.00 8,186.00 -875.00 111.97 3215 Temporary Sign Permit 412.00 110.00 538.00 -126.00 130.58 3217 Open Fire Permit 800.00 58.00 851.00 -51.00 106.38 3219 Newsrack Permits 145.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 3226 Admin Permit - Limited Outdoor Seating 543.00 0.00 0.00 543.00 0.00 3227 Mechanical Permits 94,500.00 3,484.00 52,554.00 41,946.00 55.61 3228 Concealed Weapons Permit 1,500.00 100.00 400.00 1,100.00 26.67 3229 Private Special Event Permit 1,798.00 0.00 1,798.00 0.00 100.00 3230 Temporary Minor Special Event Permit 4,011.00 643.00 3,748.00 263.00 93.44 3236 Drone Permit Fee 1,475.00 295.00 950.00 525.00 64.41 3239 A-Frame sign Permit 196.00 0.00 208.00 -12.00 106.12 Total Licenses And Permits 76.04 1,058,591.00 68,273.57 804,976.26 253,614.74 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3301 Municipal Court Fines 65,000.00 3,913.59 33,996.30 31,003.70 52.30 3302 Court Fines /Parking 1,880,000.00 163,653.45 1,334,640.62 545,359.38 70.99 3305 Administrative Fines 46,000.00 5,000.00 49,764.55 -3,764.55 108.18 3306 Nuisance Abatement- Restrooms 10,500.00 1,400.00 15,750.00 -5,250.00 150.00 Total Fines & Forfeitures 71.65 2,001,500.00 173,967.04 1,434,151.47 567,348.53 2Page: Page 128 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 380,081.00 17,628.36 271,565.06 108,515.94 71.45 3404 Community Center Leases 29,400.00 7,116.80 24,052.20 5,347.80 81.81 3405 Community Center Rentals 334,000.00 32,013.75 198,229.77 135,770.23 59.35 3406 Community Center Theatre 135,000.00 13,342.00 86,545.00 48,455.00 64.11 3418 Special Events 115,000.00 641.00 44,848.87 70,151.13 39.00 3422 Beach/Plaza Promotions 56,324.00 0.00 32,424.00 23,900.00 57.57 3424 EV Charging Site Kitu Credits 0.00 0.00 469.23 -469.23 0.00 3425 Ground Lease 60,631.00 4,958.26 43,075.02 17,555.98 71.04 3427 Cell Site License- Sprint 101,356.00 0.00 20,855.25 80,500.75 20.58 3428 Cell Site License - Verizon 80,530.00 0.00 29,999.11 50,530.89 37.25 3429 Inmate Phone Services 96.00 0.00 103.79 -7.79 108.11 3431 Storage Facility Operating Lease 278,200.00 22,510.18 202,591.62 75,608.38 72.82 3432 Film Permits 70,000.00 4,079.00 33,106.00 36,894.00 47.29 3435 Cell Site License- Crown Castle 644.00 0.00 644.00 0.00 100.00 3450 Investment Discount 9,286.00 837.61 6,556.09 2,729.91 70.60 3475 Investment Premium -67.00 -199.92 -902.69 835.69 1347.30 Total Use Of Money & Property 60.23 1,650,481.00 102,927.04 994,162.32 656,318.68 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3507 Highway Maintenance 12,000.00 0.00 0.00 12,000.00 0.00 3509 Homeowner Property Tax Relief 76,000.00 0.00 38,402.09 37,597.91 50.53 3510 POST 27,799.00 2,242.60 3,004.60 24,794.40 10.81 3Page: Page 129 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3511 STC-Service Officer Training 6,615.00 0.00 5,176.50 1,438.50 78.25 3575 VLF Coll Excess of $14m-Rev code 11001.5 31,000.00 0.00 30,133.86 866.14 97.21 Total Intergovernmental/State 50.01 153,414.00 2,242.60 76,717.05 76,696.95 3800 Current Service Charges 3801 Residential Inspection 57,400.00 3,170.00 37,314.00 20,086.00 65.01 3802 Planning Sign Permit/Master Sign Program 16,000.00 1,646.00 14,478.00 1,522.00 90.49 3804 General Plan Maintenance Fees 94,000.00 10,053.00 80,988.00 13,012.00 86.16 3805 Amendment to Planning Entitlement 15,591.00 0.00 0.00 15,591.00 0.00 3808 Zone Variance Review 0.00 0.00 14,186.00 -14,186.00 0.00 3809 Tentative Map Review 17,031.00 3,020.00 11,774.00 5,257.00 69.13 3810 Final Map Review 2,295.00 0.00 2,656.00 -361.00 115.73 3812 Conditional Use Permit - Comm/Other 23,600.00 0.00 18,195.00 5,405.00 77.10 3813 Plan Check Fees 560,000.00 16,454.13 394,494.74 165,505.26 70.45 3815 Public Works Services 120,000.00 13,783.00 113,508.89 6,491.11 94.59 3816 Utility Trench Service Connect Permit 100,000.00 67,190.27 148,941.68 -48,941.68 148.94 3817 Address Change Request Fee 4,500.00 1,248.00 6,163.00 -1,663.00 136.96 3818 Police Services 19,440.00 56.00 4,188.00 15,252.00 21.54 3821 Daily Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 15,800.00 300.00 12,750.00 3,050.00 80.70 3823 Special Event Security/Police 25,000.00 0.00 25,079.24 -79.24 100.32 3824 500' Noticing 19,560.00 0.00 8,439.00 11,121.00 43.14 3825 Public Notice Posting 3,984.00 234.00 3,664.00 320.00 91.97 3827 Library Grounds Maintenance 6,090.00 0.00 0.00 6,090.00 0.00 3831 Non-Utility Street Excavation Permit 40,000.00 3,340.00 19,620.00 20,380.00 49.05 4Page: Page 130 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3834 Encroachment Permit 4,500.00 1,590.00 21,882.00 -17,382.00 486.27 3836 Refund Transaction Fee 4,500.00 289.00 1,878.00 2,622.00 41.73 3837 Returned Check Charge 1,000.00 126.00 372.00 628.00 37.20 3839 Photocopy Charges 0.00 45.00 260.20 -260.20 0.00 3840 Ambulance Transport 943,900.00 62,049.94 662,180.59 281,719.41 70.15 3841 Police Towing 117,000.00 12,212.00 93,894.00 23,106.00 80.25 3842 Parking Meters 3,360,000.00 502,989.31 3,286,068.58 73,931.42 97.80 3843 Parking Permits-Annual 390,000.00 134,314.00 336,815.00 53,185.00 86.36 3844 Daily Parking Permits 4,000.00 288.00 4,548.00 -548.00 113.70 3845 Lot A Revenue 1,288,376.00 126,909.49 899,654.08 388,721.92 69.83 3846 No Pier Pkg Structure Revenue 705,000.00 42,084.95 421,013.15 283,986.85 59.72 3848 Driveway Permits 2,000.00 182.00 1,566.00 434.00 78.30 3849 Guest Permits 0.00 0.00 64.00 -64.00 0.00 3850 Contractors Permits 30,000.00 1,890.00 20,034.00 9,966.00 66.78 3851 Cash Key Revenue 0.00 -5.00 -5.00 5.00 0.00 3852 Recreation Program Transaction Fee 75,000.00 19,225.91 50,499.66 24,500.34 67.33 3855 Bus Passes 200.00 0.00 66.00 134.00 33.00 3856 500' - 2nd Noticing 1,950.00 0.00 1,382.00 568.00 70.87 3857 Parking Plan Application 16,332.00 0.00 0.00 16,332.00 0.00 3858 Monthly Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 9,000.00 250.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 50.00 3862 Alarm Permit Fee 6,192.00 1,150.00 5,039.00 1,153.00 81.38 3865 Lot B Revenue 340,100.00 24,390.06 178,773.19 161,326.81 52.56 3867 Precise Development Plans 16,936.00 0.00 10,168.00 6,768.00 60.04 3868 Public Noticing/300 Ft Radius 8,480.00 1,042.00 7,119.00 1,361.00 83.95 5Page: Page 131 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3877 Business License Registration 16,845.00 1,825.00 13,860.00 2,985.00 82.28 3879 Business License Renewal Fee 48,000.00 3,655.00 36,366.00 11,634.00 75.76 3883 Final/Tentative Map Extension 3,588.00 0.00 2,501.00 1,087.00 69.70 3884 Lot Line Adjustment 10,659.00 0.00 3,716.00 6,943.00 34.86 3888 Slope/Grade Height Determination 10,293.00 0.00 10,827.00 -534.00 105.19 3890 300 Ft Radius Noticing/Appeal to CC 263.00 0.00 0.00 263.00 0.00 3893 Contract Recreation Classes 770,000.00 189,149.39 500,026.21 269,973.79 64.94 3894 Other Recreation Programs 143,799.00 112,795.00 171,318.00 -27,519.00 119.14 3895 Zoning Information Letters 2,310.00 248.00 4,160.00 -1,850.00 180.09 3899 Condo - CUP/PDP 36,962.00 6,519.00 31,715.00 5,247.00 85.80 Total Current Service Charges 80.98 9,507,476.00 1,365,708.45 7,698,700.21 1,808,775.79 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0.00 164.04 325.22 -325.22 0.00 3903 Contributions Non Govt 100,000.00 4,389.46 137,961.81 -37,961.81 137.96 3904 General Miscellaneous 0.00 5,956.77 164,460.34 -164,460.34 0.00 3907 Pkg Str Utility Reimb From Beach House 10,000.00 383.91 6,420.93 3,579.07 64.21 3908 Hermosa Sr Ctr Donations/Memberships 4,700.00 329.00 3,232.50 1,467.50 68.78 3909 Concert Series Doantions/Sponsorships 3,500.00 0.00 3,145.06 354.94 89.86 3914 Planning EIR Admin Reimbursement 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 40,000.00 0.00 3938 Solid Waste Contract Admin Fee 0.00 5,746.99 45,975.92 -45,975.92 0.00 3955 Operating Transfers In 536,166.00 30,087.84 445,902.56 90,263.44 83.17 3960 Frontier PEG Grant-formerly Verizon 10,000.00 2,315.31 4,722.65 5,277.35 47.23 3968 Spectrum PEG Grant-formerly TWC 30,000.00 0.00 12,861.53 17,138.47 42.87 6Page: Page 132 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd Total Other Revenue 112.34 734,366.00 49,373.32 825,008.52 -90,642.52 6800 Current Service Charges Continued 6801 Mural Review 2,248.00 598.00 598.00 1,650.00 26.60 6804 Temporary Use Permit 1,146.00 0.00 0.00 1,146.00 0.00 6809 Categorical Exemption 4,540.00 482.00 3,061.00 1,479.00 67.42 6810 Deed Restriction/Covenant Review 7,080.00 -855.00 8,640.00 -1,560.00 122.03 6811 Landscape Plan Review 2,685.00 0.00 0.00 2,685.00 0.00 6813 Director's Determination 846.00 0.00 2,445.00 -1,599.00 289.01 6818 New/Modified Business Zoning Review 15,400.00 1,555.00 10,289.00 5,111.00 66.81 6819 Historic Resource Review 998.00 0.00 0.00 998.00 0.00 6821 Solar Plan Check/Inspection 20,000.00 900.00 13,998.15 6,001.85 69.99 6822 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 490.00 0.00 158.00 332.00 32.24 6825 Clean Bay Restaurant - NPDES Inspection 15,483.00 1,650.00 22,340.20 -6,857.20 144.29 6826 Light Industry - NPDES Inspection 0.00 0.00 518.00 -518.00 0.00 6828 Public Improvement Plan Check 60,000.00 5,732.00 76,165.26 -16,165.26 126.94 6832 DUI Collision Response 2,000.00 650.00 3,344.14 -1,344.14 167.21 6834 Citation Sign-off 1,320.00 62.00 1,094.00 226.00 82.88 6837 Deceased Animal Pickup 148.00 0.00 0.00 148.00 0.00 6840 Multiple Dog Review 276.00 0.00 0.00 276.00 0.00 6849 Traffic Plan Review 2,250.00 675.00 2,925.00 -675.00 130.00 6851 Bus. License State Mandated Fee (CASp) 7,800.00 870.00 7,720.60 79.40 98.98 6852 Tobacco Retailer Renewal 3,000.00 0.00 2,996.00 4.00 99.87 6860 Refuse Lien Fees/Athens 900.00 0.00 12,123.30 -11,223.30 1347.03 7Page: Page 133 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 6861 Oversized Vehicle Permit 324.00 56.00 542.00 -218.00 167.28 6862 Athens Enclosure Support Fee 0.00 0.00 4,926.36 -4,926.36 0.00 6867 Credit Card Processing Fee 52,000.00 5,679.65 50,828.44 1,171.56 97.75 6871 Sewer Service Charge Rebate -14,000.00 -1,031.45 -6,061.63 -7,938.37 43.30 6873 Impound Fee- Bicycle, Scooters & Wheeled 0.00 0.00 2,232.00 -2,232.00 0.00 6874 Limited Live Entertainment Permit Fee 998.00 0.00 0.00 998.00 0.00 6881 Public Tree Removal Permit 1,000.00 988.00 1,946.00 -946.00 194.60 6882 Sidewalk Vending Permit 409.00 0.00 0.00 409.00 0.00 6883 Short-term Vacation Rental Permit 13,160.00 0.00 3,632.00 9,528.00 27.60 6884 M-1 Limited Event Permit 544.00 0.00 0.00 544.00 0.00 6885 Temporary Outdoor Dining/Retail Permit 1,826.00 0.00 0.00 1,826.00 0.00 6887 Minor Planning Sign Review 274.00 0.00 0.00 274.00 0.00 6890 Outdoor Dining Encroachments 584,191.00 25,991.40 523,575.90 60,615.10 89.62 6891 Employee Lot C, 24 Hour Permit 84,400.00 5,325.00 51,450.00 32,950.00 60.96 6892 Employee Lot C, Daytime Permit 67,998.00 4,788.00 45,618.67 22,379.33 67.09 Total Current Service Charges Continued 89.95 941,734.00 54,115.60 847,105.39 94,628.61 19,879,544.61 36,922,162.39 3,131,091.41 56,801,707.00 65.00Total General Fund 8Page: Page 134 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund105 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 458,769.00 0.00 266,987.08 191,781.92 58.20 3103 Prior Year Collections 0.00 0.00 5,115.41 -5,115.41 0.00 3105 Assessment Rebates 0.00 -246.10 -1,402.77 1,402.77 0.00 Total Taxes 59.01 458,769.00 -246.10 270,699.72 188,069.28 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 9,288.00 64.73 995.41 8,292.59 10.72 3450 Investment Discount 22.00 3.08 24.64 -2.64 112.00 3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.72 -3.65 3.65 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 10.92 9,310.00 67.09 1,016.40 8,293.60 3900 Other Revenue 3955 Operating Transfers In 400,335.00 33,361.25 300,251.25 100,083.75 75.00 Total Other Revenue 75.00 400,335.00 33,361.25 300,251.25 100,083.75 296,446.63 571,967.37 33,182.24 868,414.00 65.86Total Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 9Page: Page 135 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 23,391.00 924.72 8,734.86 14,656.14 37.34 3450 Investment Discount 682.00 43.94 265.28 416.72 38.90 3475 Investment Premium -5.00 -10.49 -41.07 36.07 821.40 Total Use Of Money & Property 37.22 24,068.00 958.17 8,959.07 15,108.93 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3501 Section 2106 Allocation 75,939.00 6,361.25 48,722.06 27,216.94 64.16 3502 Section 2107 Allocation 173,697.00 10,711.87 104,582.63 69,114.37 60.21 3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 100.00 3512 Section 2105 (Prop 111) 127,397.00 10,223.18 80,001.39 47,395.61 62.80 3513 Sec 2103 Higher Mtr Veh Excise Tax(HUTA) 184,586.00 15,802.28 127,442.87 57,143.13 69.04 3567 Road Maintenance Rehab Account 533,814.00 41,589.46 312,688.58 221,125.42 58.58 Total Intergovernmental/State 61.62 1,099,433.00 84,688.04 677,437.53 421,995.47 437,104.40 686,396.60 85,646.21 1,123,501.00 61.09Total State Gas Tax Fund 10Page: Page 136 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 TDA 3 Fund116 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3522 TDA Article 3 Local 15,257.00 0.00 0.00 15,257.00 0.00 15,257.00 0.00 0.00 15,257.00 0.00Total TDA 3 Fund 11Page: Page 137 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 AB939 Fund117 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 5,217.00 318.39 5,739.79 -522.79 110.02 3450 Investment Discount 187.00 15.13 109.98 77.02 58.81 3475 Investment Premium -1.00 -3.61 -15.88 14.88 1588.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 107.98 5,403.00 329.91 5,833.89 -430.89 3800 Current Service Charges 3860 AB939 Surcharge 64,000.00 3,378.20 41,947.41 22,052.59 65.54 Total Current Service Charges 65.54 64,000.00 3,378.20 41,947.41 22,052.59 21,621.70 47,781.30 3,708.11 69,403.00 68.85Total AB939 Fund 12Page: Page 138 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 13 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Prop A Open Space Fund121 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3600 Intergovernmental/County 3608 Maintenance Allocation 18,000.00 0.00 0.00 18,000.00 0.00 18,000.00 0.00 0.00 18,000.00 0.00Total Prop A Open Space Fund 13Page: Page 139 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 14 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 55,046.00 1,989.57 58,322.29 -3,276.29 105.95 3426 Easement Agreement 343,824.00 0.00 257,868.36 85,955.64 75.00 3450 Investment Discount 1,527.00 94.54 1,054.99 472.01 69.09 3475 Investment Premium -11.00 -22.56 -135.31 124.31 1230.09 Total Use Of Money & Property 79.20 400,386.00 2,061.55 317,110.33 83,275.67 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83,275.67 317,110.33 2,061.55 400,386.00 79.20Total Tyco Fund 14Page: Page 140 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 15 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3116 Parks & Recreation Facility Tax 57,526.00 0.00 28,323.00 29,203.00 49.24 Total Taxes 49.24 57,526.00 0.00 28,323.00 29,203.00 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 8,305.00 110.20 8,543.02 -238.02 102.87 3450 Investment Discount 254.00 5.24 167.09 86.91 65.78 3475 Investment Premium -2.00 -1.25 -19.93 17.93 996.50 Total Use Of Money & Property 101.56 8,557.00 114.19 8,690.18 -133.18 3900 Other Revenue 3910 Park/Recreation In Lieu Fee 60,000.00 0.00 47,398.00 12,602.00 79.00 Total Other Revenue 79.00 60,000.00 0.00 47,398.00 12,602.00 41,671.82 84,411.18 114.19 126,083.00 66.95Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 15Page: Page 141 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 16 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund135 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 10.60 205.91 -205.91 0.00 3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.50 3.99 -3.99 0.00 3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.12 -0.55 0.55 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.00 0.00 10.98 209.35 -209.35 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -209.35 209.35 10.98 0.00 0.00Total Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund 16Page: Page 142 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 17 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund138 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.03 0.56 -0.56 0.00 -0.56 0.56 0.03 0.00 0.00Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 17Page: Page 143 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 18 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund139 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 2.64 52.08 -52.08 0.00 3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.13 1.00 -1.00 0.00 3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.03 -0.13 0.13 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.00 0.00 2.74 52.95 -52.95 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -52.95 52.95 2.74 0.00 0.00Total Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 18Page: Page 144 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 19 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Community Dev Block Grant140 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.00 0.03 -0.03 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 -0.03 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal 3720 Americans with Disabilities Act 184,000.00 0.00 0.00 184,000.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/Federal 0.00 184,000.00 0.00 0.00 184,000.00 183,999.97 0.03 0.00 184,000.00 0.00Total Community Dev Block Grant 19Page: Page 145 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 20 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition A Fund145 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3117 Proposition A Transit 493,759.00 37,714.54 383,808.71 109,950.29 77.73 Total Taxes 77.73 493,759.00 37,714.54 383,808.71 109,950.29 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 17,721.00 661.23 2,532.42 15,188.58 14.29 3450 Investment Discount 442.00 31.42 174.99 267.01 39.59 3475 Investment Premium -3.00 -7.50 -27.41 24.41 913.67 Total Use Of Money & Property 14.76 18,160.00 685.15 2,680.00 15,480.00 3800 Current Service Charges 3853 Dial-A-Taxi Program 0.00 53.00 257.00 -257.00 0.00 Total Current Service Charges 0.00 0.00 53.00 257.00 -257.00 125,173.29 386,745.71 38,452.69 511,919.00 75.55Total Proposition A Fund 20Page: Page 146 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 21 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition C Fund146 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3118 Proposition C Local Return 409,560.00 31,283.22 318,358.42 91,201.58 77.73 Total Taxes 77.73 409,560.00 31,283.22 318,358.42 91,201.58 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 24,999.00 1,430.45 27,334.81 -2,335.81 109.34 3450 Investment Discount 1,009.00 67.97 526.23 482.77 52.15 3475 Investment Premium -7.00 -16.22 -73.35 66.35 1047.86 Total Use Of Money & Property 106.87 26,001.00 1,482.20 27,787.69 -1,786.69 89,414.89 346,146.11 32,765.42 435,561.00 79.47Total Proposition C Fund 21Page: Page 147 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 22 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure R Fund147 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3119 Measure R Local Return Funds 307,170.00 23,453.83 238,724.03 68,445.97 77.72 Total Taxes 77.72 307,170.00 23,453.83 238,724.03 68,445.97 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 7,287.00 817.21 8,614.85 -1,327.85 118.22 3450 Investment Discount 611.00 38.83 268.61 342.39 43.96 3475 Investment Premium -4.00 -9.27 -38.33 34.33 958.25 Total Use Of Money & Property 112.05 7,894.00 846.77 8,845.13 -951.13 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67,494.84 247,569.16 24,300.60 315,064.00 78.58Total Measure R Fund 22Page: Page 148 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 23 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure M148 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3131 Measure M Local Return Funds 348,126.00 26,470.50 270,393.26 77,732.74 77.67 Total Taxes 77.67 348,126.00 26,470.50 270,393.26 77,732.74 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 7,291.00 457.20 1,588.31 5,702.69 21.78 3450 Investment Discount 290.00 21.72 111.21 178.79 38.35 3475 Investment Premium -2.00 -5.19 -18.32 16.32 916.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 22.18 7,579.00 473.73 1,681.20 5,897.80 83,630.54 272,074.46 26,944.23 355,705.00 76.49Total Measure M 23Page: Page 149 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 24 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure W Fund149 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3132 Measure W Local Returns 155,879.00 0.00 155,879.60 -0.60 100.00 Total Taxes 100.00 155,879.00 0.00 155,879.60 -0.60 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 28,454.00 1,702.67 31,268.60 -2,814.60 109.89 3450 Investment Discount 526.00 80.90 606.64 -80.64 115.33 3475 Investment Premium -4.00 -19.31 -86.15 82.15 2153.75 Total Use Of Money & Property 109.71 28,976.00 1,764.26 31,789.09 -2,813.09 3600 Intergovernmental/County Total Intergovernmental/County 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2,813.69 187,668.69 1,764.26 184,855.00 101.52Total Measure W Fund 24Page: Page 150 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 25 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3562 State Homeland Security Grant Program 65,000.00 0.00 0.00 65,000.00 0.00 3593 CalRecycle Grant 7,500.00 0.00 0.00 7,500.00 0.00 3594 State Dept of Parks & Rec Specific Grant 460,000.00 0.00 460,000.00 0.00 100.00 3596 CalRecycle Rubber Grant 50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 100.00 3597 MWD Turf Removal Grant 96,242.00 0.00 0.00 96,242.00 0.00 3598 State Dept of Parks & Rec Reimb 189,849.00 0.00 0.00 189,849.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/State 58.72 868,591.00 0.00 510,000.00 358,591.00 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal 3752 Real Time Crime Center Grant 963,000.00 0.00 145,934.10 817,065.90 15.15 3757 CalOES Grant - Tsunami Siren 70,300.00 0.00 0.00 70,300.00 0.00 3758 CalOES Grant - Education 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 4,500.00 0.00 3760 Mobile Crisis Response Team 416,433.00 0.00 254,739.26 161,693.74 61.17 3763 STEP (Selective Traffic Enf Prog) Grant 80,000.00 0.00 21,821.43 58,178.57 27.28 Total Intergovernmental/Federal 27.54 1,534,233.00 0.00 422,494.79 1,111,738.21 3900 Other Revenue 3921 BCHD Opioid Revenue 0.00 449.98 8,671.67 -8,671.67 0.00 3926 Opioid Settlement- Distributor 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 3927 Opioid Settlement- NOAT* 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 3928 Opioid Settlement- Janssen 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 3964 OPC Sea Level Rise Analysis Grant 583,307.00 0.00 0.00 583,307.00 0.00 3975 RPOSD Meas A Grant 0.00 0.00 58,407.11 -58,407.11 0.00 25Page: Page 151 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 26 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd Total Other Revenue 10.59 633,307.00 449.98 67,078.78 566,228.22 2,036,557.43 999,573.57 449.98 3,036,131.00 32.92Total Grants Fund 26Page: Page 152 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 27 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund152 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3,869.00 227.07 4,244.14 -375.14 109.70 3450 Investment Discount 76.00 10.79 81.08 -5.08 106.68 3475 Investment Premium -1.00 -2.58 -11.56 10.56 1156.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 109.37 3,944.00 235.28 4,313.66 -369.66 3500 Intergovernmental/State 3538 AQMD Emission Control AB2766 25,000.00 0.00 12,394.24 12,605.76 49.58 Total Intergovernmental/State 49.58 25,000.00 0.00 12,394.24 12,605.76 12,236.10 16,707.90 235.28 28,944.00 57.72Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 27Page: Page 153 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 28 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)153 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 3135 C.O.P.S. Allocation 150,000.00 0.00 201,536.61 -51,536.61 134.36 Total Taxes 134.36 150,000.00 0.00 201,536.61 -51,536.61 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 17,093.00 986.05 18,754.67 -1,661.67 109.72 3450 Investment Discount 363.00 46.85 355.23 7.77 97.86 3475 Investment Premium -3.00 -11.18 -52.02 49.02 1734.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 109.20 17,453.00 1,021.72 19,057.88 -1,604.88 -53,141.49 220,594.49 1,021.72 167,453.00 131.74Total Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF) 28Page: Page 154 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 29 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 FEMA/Cal OES157 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal 3755 FEMA- Public Assistance Covid-19 0.00 0.00 20,991.38 -20,991.38 0.00 -20,991.38 20,991.38 0.00 0.00 0.00Total FEMA/Cal OES 29Page: Page 155 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 30 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Sewer Fund160 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 71,512.00 3,407.02 77,171.27 -5,659.27 107.91 3450 Investment Discount 2,950.00 161.89 1,562.61 1,387.39 52.97 3475 Investment Premium -21.00 -38.64 -202.73 181.73 965.38 Total Use Of Money & Property 105.49 74,441.00 3,530.27 78,531.15 -4,090.15 3500 Intergovernmental/State Total Intergovernmental/State 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3600 Intergovernmental/County 3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance 0.00 10,835.72 10,835.72 -10,835.72 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/County 0.00 0.00 10,835.72 10,835.72 -10,835.72 3800 Current Service Charges 3828 Sewer Connection Fee 8,000.00 0.00 4,935.00 3,065.00 61.69 3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 1,800.00 167.00 2,278.00 -478.00 126.56 3832 Sewer Lateral Installation 17,000.00 0.00 16,307.27 692.73 95.93 Total Current Service Charges 87.76 26,800.00 167.00 23,520.27 3,279.73 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6800 Current Service Charges Continued 6861 Sewer Service Charge 1,247,000.00 0.00 770,654.04 476,345.96 61.80 30Page: Page 156 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 31 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Sewer Fund160 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd Total Current Service Charges Continued 61.80 1,247,000.00 0.00 770,654.04 476,345.96 464,699.82 883,541.18 14,532.99 1,348,241.00 65.53Total Sewer Fund 31Page: Page 157 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 32 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Storm Drains Fund161 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 85,330.00 3,379.65 91,016.38 -5,686.38 106.66 3450 Investment Discount 1,850.00 160.58 1,344.35 505.65 72.67 3475 Investment Premium -13.00 -38.33 -184.61 171.61 1420.08 Total Use Of Money & Property 105.75 87,167.00 3,501.90 92,176.12 -5,009.12 3600 Intergovernmental/County 3602 Beach Outlet Maint. 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/County 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 3900 Other Revenue 3955 Operating Transfers In 700,000.00 58,333.33 524,999.97 175,000.03 75.00 Total Other Revenue 75.00 700,000.00 58,333.33 524,999.97 175,000.03 194,990.91 617,176.09 61,835.23 812,167.00 75.99Total Storm Drains Fund 32Page: Page 158 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 33 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3300 Fines & Forfeitures 3308 Department of Treasury Forfeited Funds 0.00 0.00 126,711.61 -126,711.61 0.00 Total Fines & Forfeitures 0.00 0.00 0.00 126,711.61 -126,711.61 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 24,825.00 820.10 15,531.91 9,293.09 62.57 3450 Investment Discount 413.00 38.97 309.86 103.14 75.03 3475 Investment Premium -3.00 -9.30 -43.86 40.86 1462.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 62.60 25,235.00 849.77 15,797.91 9,437.09 -117,274.52 142,509.52 849.77 25,235.00 564.73Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 33Page: Page 159 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 34 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Fire Protection Fund180 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 166.00 33.89 558.46 -392.46 336.42 3450 Investment Discount 0.00 1.58 10.48 -10.48 0.00 3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.38 -1.55 1.55 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 341.80 166.00 35.09 567.39 -401.39 3900 Other Revenue 3912 Fire Flow Fee 4,000.00 511.64 7,393.87 -3,393.87 184.85 Total Other Revenue 184.85 4,000.00 511.64 7,393.87 -3,393.87 -3,795.26 7,961.26 546.73 4,166.00 191.10Total Fire Protection Fund 34Page: Page 160 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 35 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Undersea Cable190 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 34,343.00 1,451.27 35,954.69 -1,611.69 104.69 3426 Easement Cable 1-2nd Street 93,900.00 0.00 70,425.00 23,475.00 75.00 3427 Easement Cable 2-Longfellow 75,120.00 0.00 56,340.00 18,780.00 75.00 3428 Easement Cable 3-25th St 71,990.00 0.00 53,992.50 17,997.50 75.00 3450 Investment Discount 839.00 68.96 664.28 174.72 79.18 3475 Investment Premium -6.00 -16.46 -91.16 85.16 1519.33 Total Use Of Money & Property 78.67 276,186.00 1,503.77 217,285.31 58,900.69 3900 Other Revenue Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58,900.69 217,285.31 1,503.77 276,186.00 78.67Total RTI Undersea Cable 35Page: Page 161 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 36 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Tidelands191 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 12,301.00 463.08 9,770.88 2,530.12 79.43 3450 Investment Discount 301.00 22.00 198.59 102.41 65.98 3475 Investment Premium -2.00 -5.25 -26.38 24.38 1319.00 2,656.91 9,943.09 479.83 12,600.00 78.91Total RTI Tidelands 36Page: Page 162 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 37 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds201 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3900 Other Revenue 3955 Operating Transfers In 728,200.00 119,178.39 714,139.83 14,060.17 98.07 14,060.17 714,139.83 119,178.39 728,200.00 98.07Total 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds 37Page: Page 163 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 38 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 337,151.00 17,683.04 366,717.38 -29,566.38 108.77 3450 Investment Discount 9,257.00 840.21 6,837.83 2,419.17 73.87 3475 Investment Premium -67.00 -200.54 -975.91 908.91 1456.58 Total Use Of Money & Property 107.58 346,341.00 18,322.71 372,579.30 -26,238.30 3500 Intergovernmental/State Total Intergovernmental/State 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3900 Other Revenue 3908 Donations to CIP Fund 14,224.00 14,224.00 14,224.00 0.00 100.00 3955 Operating Transfers In 90,000.00 7,500.00 67,500.00 22,500.00 75.00 Total Other Revenue 78.41 104,224.00 21,724.00 81,724.00 22,500.00 -3,738.30 454,303.30 40,046.71 450,565.00 100.83Total Capital Improvement Fund 38Page: Page 164 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 39 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Greenwich Village N Utility Undergrnd Im313 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.00 57,943.95 -57,943.95 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 57,943.95 -57,943.95 3900 Other Revenue 3922 Other Financing Sources 4,031,600.00 0.00 0.00 4,031,600.00 0.00 3940 Property Owner Cash Contribution 0.00 0.00 367,853.03 -367,853.03 0.00 3941 Bond Financed Contribution Revenue 0.00 0.00 3,336,714.01 -3,336,714.01 0.00 Total Other Revenue 91.89 4,031,600.00 0.00 3,704,567.04 327,032.96 269,089.01 3,762,510.99 0.00 4,031,600.00 93.33Total Greenwich Village N Utility Undergrnd Im 39Page: Page 165 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 40 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2609 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.00 291.80 -291.80 0.00 3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.00 8.21 -8.21 0.00 3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 -0.57 0.57 0.00 -299.44 299.44 0.00 0.00 0.00Total Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2 40Page: Page 166 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 41 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund610 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.15 97.37 -97.37 0.00 3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.01 1.59 -1.59 0.00 3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 -0.18 0.18 0.00 -98.78 98.78 0.16 0.00 0.00Total Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund 41Page: Page 167 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 42 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund611 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.09 62.91 -62.91 0.00 3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.01 1.02 -1.02 0.00 3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 -0.10 0.10 0.00 -63.83 63.83 0.10 0.00 0.00Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund 42Page: Page 168 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 43 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund612 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 138.00 7.89 155.70 -17.70 112.83 3450 Investment Discount 3.00 0.38 2.99 0.01 99.67 3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.09 -0.43 0.43 0.00 -17.26 158.26 8.18 141.00 112.24Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund 43Page: Page 169 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 44 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2619 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3400 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 0.00 25.90 511.06 -511.06 0.00 3450 Investment Discount 0.00 1.23 9.75 -9.75 0.00 3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.29 -1.35 1.35 0.00 -519.46 519.46 26.84 0.00 0.00Total Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2 44Page: Page 170 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 45 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Greenwich Bond Reserve623 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3100 Taxes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Total Greenwich Bond Reserve 45Page: Page 171 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 46 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Insurance Fund705 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3800 Current Service Charges 3880 Insurance Service Charges 4,338,529.00 361,545.00 3,253,905.00 1,084,624.00 75.00 Total Current Service Charges 75.00 4,338,529.00 361,545.00 3,253,905.00 1,084,624.00 3900 Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0.00 0.00 2,400.00 -2,400.00 0.00 3904 General Miscellaneous 107,754.00 22,903.36 108,882.37 -1,128.37 101.05 3955 Operating Transfers In 317,833.00 0.00 317,833.00 0.00 100.00 Total Other Revenue 100.83 425,587.00 22,903.36 429,115.37 -3,528.37 1,081,095.63 3,683,020.37 384,448.36 4,764,116.00 77.31Total Insurance Fund 46Page: Page 172 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 47 10:44AM Page:revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Account Number Adjusted Estimate Revenues Year-to-date Revenues Balance Prct Rcvd 3800 Current Service Charges 3822 Building Maintenance Service Charges 102,557.00 8,545.00 76,905.00 25,652.00 74.99 3885 Comm Equip/Business Mach Charges 1,014,968.00 84,582.00 761,238.00 253,730.00 75.00 3889 Vehicle/Equip Replacement Charges 745,468.00 62,122.34 559,101.06 186,366.94 75.00 Total Current Service Charges 75.00 1,862,993.00 155,249.34 1,397,244.06 465,748.94 3900 Other Revenue 3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 0.00 0.00 92,064.69 -92,064.69 0.00 Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 92,064.69 -92,064.69 6800 Current Service Charges Continued 6866 Records Technology Fee 90,000.00 10,299.28 90,599.49 -599.49 100.67 Total Current Service Charges Continued 100.67 90,000.00 10,299.28 90,599.49 -599.49 373,084.76 1,579,908.24 165,548.62 1,952,993.00 80.90Total Equipment Replacement Fund Grand Total 79,048,593.00 4,170,757.32 53,401,602.48 25,646,990.52 67.56 47Page: Page 173 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 City Council1101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1101-4100 Salaries and Benefits 56,735.00 3,242.06 40,293.96 71.021101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 16,441.04 2,138.00 0.00 2,137.62 99.981101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.38 50,880.00 4,240.00 38,160.00 75.001101-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 12,720.00 60,902.00 4,803.31 44,628.11 73.281101-4180 Retirement 0.00 16,273.89 66,679.00 5,141.95 48,906.85 73.351101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 17,772.15 1,596.00 110.16 1,173.28 73.511101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 422.72 Total Salaries and Benefits 238,930.00 17,537.48 175,299.82 0.00 63,630.18 73.37 1101-4200 Contract Services 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 3,000.00 Total Contract Services 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 1101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 250.00 16.34 107.65 43.061101-4304 Telephone 0.00 142.35 17,000.00 867.65 7,228.56 47.871101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 908.67 8,862.77 38,343.00 0.00 38,497.17 100.401101-4315 Membership 0.00 -154.17 28,000.00 1,872.71 9,796.84 35.521101-4317 Conference/Training 150.00 18,053.16 37,400.00 4,911.00 20,078.57 53.691101-4319 Special Events 0.00 17,321.43 3,620.00 302.00 2,718.00 75.081101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 902.00 9,896.00 825.00 7,425.00 75.031101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 2,471.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 134,509.00 8,794.70 85,851.79 1,058.67 47,598.54 64.61 Total City Council 376,439.00 26,332.18 261,151.61 1,058.67 114,228.72 69.66 1Page: Page 174 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 City Clerk1121 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1121-4100 Salaries and Benefits 387,170.00 12,002.70 274,336.04 70.861121-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 112,833.96 0.00 2,123.29 2,123.29 0.001121-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -2,123.29 22,647.00 6,928.19 29,574.77 130.591121-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -6,927.77 9,733.00 5,904.00 9,471.00 97.311121-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 262.00 42,764.00 1,375.99 25,080.30 58.651121-4180 Retirement 0.00 17,683.70 72,449.00 2,533.42 56,430.46 77.891121-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 16,018.54 6,066.00 394.39 4,701.35 77.501121-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 1,364.65 Total Salaries and Benefits 540,829.00 31,261.98 401,717.21 0.00 139,111.79 74.28 1121-4200 Contract Services 121,350.00 17,850.50 120,416.52 144.211121-4201 Contract Serv/Private 54,585.58 -53,652.10 Total Contract Services 121,350.00 17,850.50 120,416.52 54,585.58 -53,652.10 144.21 1121-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 800.00 86.64 590.59 73.821121-4304 Telephone 0.00 209.41 10,000.00 244.30 4,492.41 47.171121-4305 Office Oper Supplies 224.23 5,283.36 1,550.00 0.00 1,830.00 137.421121-4315 Membership 300.00 -580.00 10,000.00 0.00 2,805.96 28.061121-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 7,194.04 18,000.00 425.76 5,793.10 32.181121-4323 Public Noticing 0.00 12,206.90 8,566.00 714.00 6,426.00 75.021121-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 2,140.00 612.00 51.00 459.00 75.001121-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 153.00 29,948.00 2,496.00 22,464.00 75.011121-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 7,484.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 79,476.00 4,017.70 44,861.06 524.23 34,090.71 57.11 1121-5400 Equipment/Furniture 9,130.00 0.00 0.00 0.001121-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 9,130.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 9,130.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,130.00 0.00 Total City Clerk 750,785.00 53,130.18 566,994.79 55,109.81 128,680.40 82.86 2Page: Page 175 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 City Attorney1131 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1131-4200 Contract Services 680,000.00 52,760.41 499,435.37 73.451131-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 180,564.63 Total City Attorney 680,000.00 52,760.41 499,435.37 0.00 180,564.63 73.45 3Page: Page 176 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 City Prosecutor1132 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1132-4200 Contract Services 221,328.00 18,444.00 147,552.00 100.001132-4201 Contract Serv/Private 73,776.00 0.00 Total Contract Services 221,328.00 18,444.00 147,552.00 73,776.00 0.00 100.00 1132-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 200.00 16.34 107.65 53.831132-4304 Telephone 0.00 92.35 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 200.00 16.34 107.65 0.00 92.35 53.83 Total City Prosecutor 221,528.00 18,460.34 147,659.65 73,776.00 92.35 99.96 4Page: Page 177 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 5 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 City Treasurer1141 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1141-4100 Salaries and Benefits 6,360.00 530.00 4,770.00 75.001141-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 1,590.00 524.00 45.21 406.89 77.651141-4180 Retirement 0.00 117.11 22,410.00 1,928.33 16,624.84 74.181141-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 5,785.16 92.00 7.68 69.12 75.131141-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 22.88 Total Salaries and Benefits 29,386.00 2,511.22 21,870.85 0.00 7,515.15 74.43 1141-4200 Contract Services 9,775.00 0.00 5,879.29 98.511141-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3,750.00 145.71 Total Contract Services 9,775.00 0.00 5,879.29 3,750.00 145.71 98.51 1141-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 604.00 62.13 429.15 71.051141-4304 Telephone 0.00 174.85 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.001141-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 120.00 110.00 0.00 125.00 113.641141-4315 Membership 0.00 -15.00 2,405.00 0.00 360.00 14.971141-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 2,045.00 1,133.00 94.00 846.00 74.671141-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 287.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4,372.00 156.13 1,760.15 0.00 2,611.85 40.26 Total City Treasurer 43,533.00 2,667.35 29,510.29 3,750.00 10,272.71 76.40 5Page: Page 178 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 6 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 City Manager1201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1201-4100 Salaries and Benefits 1,144,427.00 96,137.44 859,514.61 75.101201-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 284,912.39 21,532.00 0.00 21,531.84 100.001201-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.16 14,880.00 492.00 5,772.00 38.791201-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 9,108.00 163,869.00 14,349.28 129,135.90 78.801201-4180 Retirement 0.00 34,733.10 131,059.00 11,525.99 92,118.86 70.291201-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 38,940.14 17,175.00 1,413.44 12,995.77 75.671201-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 4,179.23 Total Salaries and Benefits 1,492,942.00 123,918.15 1,121,068.98 0.00 371,873.02 75.09 1201-4200 Contract Services 704,668.00 74,337.01 423,387.53 97.351201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 262,577.35 18,703.12 78,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 78,500.00 Total Contract Services 783,168.00 74,337.01 423,387.53 262,577.35 97,203.12 87.59 1201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 5,000.00 352.05 4,204.00 94.901201-4304 Telephone 540.75 255.25 15,800.00 958.23 6,006.56 39.031201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 160.11 9,633.33 3,125.00 1,418.88 2,438.88 81.241201-4315 Membership 100.00 586.12 28,230.00 2,103.70 9,530.16 34.021201-4317 Conference/Training 75.00 18,624.84 62,527.00 5,211.00 46,899.00 75.011201-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 15,628.00 4,321.00 360.00 3,240.00 74.981201-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 1,081.00 97,607.00 8,134.00 73,206.00 75.001201-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 24,401.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 216,610.00 18,537.86 145,524.60 875.86 70,209.54 67.59 1201-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total City Manager 2,492,720.00 216,793.02 1,689,981.11 263,453.21 539,285.68 78.37 6Page: Page 179 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Finance Administration1202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1202-4100 Salaries and Benefits 758,831.00 62,717.66 562,551.28 74.131202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 196,279.72 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001202-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 2,000.00 16,838.00 0.00 16,838.39 100.001202-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.39 109,000.00 9,622.80 66,305.31 60.831202-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 42,694.69 147,705.00 13,615.05 120,288.55 81.441202-4180 Retirement 0.00 27,416.45 95,074.00 7,882.73 69,198.03 72.781202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 25,875.97 12,497.00 1,095.79 9,830.44 78.661202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 2,666.56 Total Salaries and Benefits 1,141,945.00 94,934.03 845,012.00 0.00 296,933.00 74.00 1202-4200 Contract Services 216,150.00 3,000.00 86,587.51 52.001202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 25,813.07 103,749.42 Total Contract Services 216,150.00 3,000.00 86,587.51 25,813.07 103,749.42 52.00 1202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,000.00 127.47 859.67 85.971202-4304 Telephone 0.00 140.33 7,500.00 436.55 6,418.94 85.591202-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 1,081.06 1,030.00 120.00 275.00 26.701202-4315 Membership 0.00 755.00 6,800.00 3,080.15 3,680.15 62.211202-4317 Conference/Training 550.00 2,569.85 7,299.00 608.00 5,472.00 74.971202-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 1,827.00 2,113.00 176.00 1,584.00 74.961202-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 529.00 65,184.00 5,432.00 48,888.00 75.001202-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 16,296.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 90,926.00 9,980.17 67,177.76 550.00 23,198.24 74.49 1202-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1202-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Finance Administration 1,449,021.00 107,914.20 998,777.27 26,363.07 423,880.66 70.75 7Page: Page 180 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Human Resources1203 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1203-4100 Salaries and Benefits 266,503.00 9,942.72 164,008.60 61.541203-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 102,494.40 161.00 0.00 160.60 99.751203-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 0.40 9,609.00 0.00 9,609.05 100.001203-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.05 18,655.00 1,266.90 2,558.40 13.711203-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 16,096.60 17,530.00 864.99 12,050.30 68.741203-4180 Retirement 0.00 5,479.70 280,428.00 21,669.18 201,416.99 72.811203-4188 Employee Benefits 2,772.92 76,238.09 3,733.00 164.23 2,673.94 71.631203-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 1,059.06 8,871.00 608.82 6,392.61 72.061203-4191 Instant Bonuses 0.00 2,478.39 230,000.00 7,000.00 179,333.00 77.971203-4192 Signing Bonus 0.00 50,667.00 Total Salaries and Benefits 835,490.00 41,516.84 578,203.49 2,772.92 254,513.59 69.54 1203-4200 Contract Services 337,298.00 23,259.96 176,755.38 89.641203-4201 Contract Serv/Private 125,613.32 34,929.30 6,000.00 96.00 1,398.00 23.301203-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 4,602.00 Total Contract Services 343,298.00 23,355.96 178,153.38 125,613.32 39,531.30 88.48 1203-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,800.00 119.30 805.72 44.761203-4304 Telephone 0.00 994.28 4,500.00 381.80 3,979.41 88.431203-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 520.59 4,025.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-4315 Membership 0.00 4,025.00 8,000.00 889.25 8,994.35 114.421203-4317 Conference/Training 159.00 -1,153.35 26,000.00 654.00 13,437.62 66.911203-4320 Medical Exams 3,960.00 8,602.38 3,992.00 333.00 2,997.00 75.081203-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 995.00 612.00 51.00 459.00 75.001203-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 153.00 30,618.00 2,552.00 22,968.00 75.011203-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 7,650.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 79,547.00 4,980.35 53,641.10 4,119.00 21,786.90 72.61 Total Human Resources 1,258,335.00 69,853.15 809,997.97 132,505.24 315,831.79 74.90 8Page: Page 181 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 9 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Finance Cashier1204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1204-4100 Salaries and Benefits 551,906.00 46,843.91 415,093.92 75.211204-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 136,812.08 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 500.00 10,343.00 0.00 10,343.24 100.001204-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.24 62,175.00 5,520.14 48,666.22 78.271204-4180 Retirement 0.00 13,508.78 138,059.00 12,395.74 103,767.44 75.161204-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 34,291.56 8,363.00 697.91 6,331.70 75.711204-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 2,031.30 Total Salaries and Benefits 771,346.00 65,457.70 584,202.52 0.00 187,143.48 75.74 1204-4200 Contract Services 185,337.00 5,541.09 111,531.75 60.571204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 728.00 73,077.25 250.00 0.00 43.20 17.281204-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 206.80 Total Contract Services 185,587.00 5,541.09 111,574.95 728.00 73,284.05 60.51 1204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 5,200.00 326.38 2,422.41 46.581204-4304 Telephone 0.00 2,777.59 39,489.00 3,389.35 28,112.93 79.381204-4305 Office Operating Supplies 3,233.34 8,142.73 400.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-4315 Membership 0.00 400.00 5,200.00 2,447.00 10,332.82 198.711204-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 -5,132.82 13,115.00 1,093.00 9,837.00 75.011204-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 3,278.00 1,828.00 152.00 1,368.00 74.841204-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 460.00 42,110.00 3,509.00 31,581.00 75.001204-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 10,529.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 107,342.00 10,916.73 83,654.16 3,233.34 20,454.50 80.94 Total Finance Cashier 1,064,275.00 81,915.52 779,431.63 3,961.34 280,882.03 73.61 9Page: Page 182 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 General Appropriations1208 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1208-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 150.00 8.17 53.81 35.871208-4304 Telephone 0.00 96.19 10,000.00 -252.13 4,660.58 46.611208-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 5,339.42 3,233.00 269.00 2,421.00 74.881208-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 812.00 Total General Appropriations 13,383.00 25.04 7,135.39 0.00 6,247.61 53.32 10Page: Page 183 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Prospective Expenditures1214 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1214-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 225,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001214-4322 Unclassified 0.00 225,000.00 Total Prospective Expenditures 225,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 225,000.00 0.00 11Page: Page 184 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 12 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Resident & Business Hazard Mitigation Ed1227 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1227-4200 Contract Services Total Resident & Business Hazard Mitigation Ed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12Page: Page 185 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 13 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,236,368.00 218,372.97 1,924,724.05 86.061299-4399 OperatingTransfers Out 0.00 311,643.95 Total Interfund Transfers Out 2,236,368.00 218,372.97 1,924,724.05 0.00 311,643.95 86.06 13Page: Page 186 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 14 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Police2101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2101-4100 Salaries and Benefits 7,356,716.00 638,713.08 5,646,086.99 76.752101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 1,710,629.01 115,090.00 9,816.92 84,207.19 73.172101-4105 Special Duty Pay 0.00 30,882.81 1,123,639.00 34,276.36 950,838.49 84.622101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 172,800.51 680,206.00 67,118.08 424,429.70 62.402101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 255,776.30 4,654.00 0.00 1,531.91 32.922101-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 3,122.09 12,813.00 893.75 8,977.01 70.062101-4117 Shift Differential 0.00 3,835.99 50,063.00 3,368.96 39,591.04 79.082101-4118 Training Officer 0.00 10,471.96 4,339,914.00 347,835.28 3,088,471.26 71.162101-4180 Retirement 0.00 1,251,442.74 2,517.00 0.00 1,517.40 60.292101-4184 IRC 415(B) Retirement 0.00 999.60 0.00 15.19 99.59 0.002101-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 44.41 -144.00 43,295.00 3,625.21 32,253.54 74.502101-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 11,041.46 966,972.00 84,489.02 714,922.54 73.932101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 252,049.46 137,579.00 11,160.18 104,932.63 76.272101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 32,646.37 Total Salaries and Benefits 14,833,458.00 1,201,312.03 11,097,859.29 44.41 3,735,554.30 74.82 2101-4200 Contract Services 374,695.00 49,673.78 221,736.57 63.002101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 14,317.77 138,640.66 929,269.00 207,700.00 929,455.00 100.022101-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 -186.00 Total Contract Services 1,303,964.00 257,373.78 1,151,191.57 14,317.77 138,454.66 89.38 2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 57,540.00 5,735.52 45,260.91 78.832101-4304 Telephone 100.00 12,179.09 73,000.00 2,728.95 40,391.73 60.242101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 3,586.41 29,021.86 26,080.00 2,345.53 14,586.93 56.762101-4306 Prisoner Maintenance 215.99 11,277.08 4,248.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4307 Radio Maintenance 0.00 4,248.00 8,500.00 163.73 1,439.25 19.792101-4309 Maintenance Materials 242.63 6,818.12 27,799.00 150.00 2,738.88 9.852101-4312 Travel Expense , POST 0.00 25,060.12 6,615.00 489.15 4,475.23 69.162101-4313 Travel Expense, STC 100.00 2,039.77 45,000.00 1,559.29 23,795.22 57.902101-4314 Uniforms 2,257.68 18,947.10 8,160.00 199.00 4,543.00 55.672101-4315 Membership 0.00 3,617.00 14Page: Page 187 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 15 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Police2101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 205,831.00 9,358.07 154,376.27 79.272101-4317 Conference/Training 8,781.73 42,673.00 22,713.00 0.00 2,040.70 8.982101-4329 Recruitment/Hiring 0.00 20,672.30 2,252.00 0.00 0.00 50.292101-4350 Safety Gear 1,132.42 1,119.58 670,794.00 55,900.00 503,100.00 75.002101-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 167,694.00 11,250.00 938.00 8,442.00 75.042101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 2,808.00 147,800.00 12,316.67 110,850.03 75.002101-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 36,949.97 1,879,167.00 156,597.00 1,409,373.00 75.002101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 469,794.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3,196,749.00 248,480.91 2,325,413.15 16,416.86 854,918.99 73.26 2101-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Police 19,334,171.00 1,707,166.72 14,574,464.01 30,779.04 4,728,927.95 75.54 15Page: Page 188 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 16 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 County Fire District Costs2202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2202-4200 Contract Services 6,890,580.00 579,412.43 5,745,520.59 100.052202-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 1,148,430.00 -3,370.59 Total County Fire District Costs 6,890,580.00 579,412.43 5,745,520.59 1,148,430.00 -3,370.59 100.05 16Page: Page 189 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 17 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Fire Department Legacy Costs2203 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2203-4100 Salaries and Benefits 1,239,952.00 0.00 1,239,952.00 100.002203-4180 Retirement 0.00 0.00 Total Fire Department Legacy Costs 1,239,952.00 0.00 1,239,952.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 17Page: Page 190 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 18 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Medians3101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3101-4100 Salaries and Benefits 0.00 5.14 46.26 0.003101-4180 Retirement 0.00 -46.26 Total Medians 0.00 5.14 46.26 0.00 -46.26 0.00 18Page: Page 191 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 19 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Street Maint/Traffic Safety3104 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3104-4100 Salaries and Benefits 526,453.00 45,216.65 392,408.39 74.543104-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 134,044.61 45,714.00 630.23 36,344.47 79.503104-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 9,369.53 25,373.00 0.00 25,372.50 100.003104-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.50 247,652.00 21,659.83 193,901.09 78.303104-4180 Retirement 0.00 53,750.91 1,844.00 154.00 1,382.00 74.953104-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 462.00 124,050.00 11,016.40 93,621.99 75.473104-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 30,428.01 7,154.00 565.87 5,545.07 77.513104-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 1,608.93 Total Salaries and Benefits 978,240.00 79,242.98 748,575.51 0.00 229,664.49 76.52 3104-4200 Contract Services 647,861.00 7,645.53 163,752.33 68.093104-4201 Contract Serv/Private 277,361.71 206,746.96 11,400.00 656.32 8,016.22 83.943104-4251 Contract Service/Govt 1,552.78 1,831.00 Total Contract Services 659,261.00 8,301.85 171,768.55 278,914.49 208,577.96 68.36 3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 28,000.00 885.56 6,672.40 23.833104-4303 Utilities 0.00 21,327.60 120,000.00 5,705.45 109,161.30 92.243104-4309 Maintenance Materials 1,532.68 9,306.02 666.00 55.00 495.00 74.323104-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 171.00 85,722.00 7,143.50 64,291.50 75.003104-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 21,430.50 163,261.00 13,605.00 122,445.00 75.003104-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 40,816.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 397,649.00 27,394.51 303,065.20 1,532.68 93,051.12 76.60 3104-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Street Maint/Traffic Safety 2,035,150.00 114,939.34 1,223,409.26 280,447.17 531,293.57 73.89 19Page: Page 192 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 20 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Downtown Enhancement3301 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3301-4100 Salaries and Benefits 55,641.00 4,613.36 41,394.61 74.403301-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 14,246.39 889.00 630.23 1,519.37 170.913301-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -630.37 4,660.00 0.00 4,660.12 100.003301-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.12 15,677.00 1,742.95 15,148.33 96.633301-4180 Retirement 0.00 528.67 102.00 8.50 75.50 74.023301-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 26.50 9,376.00 837.45 6,921.21 73.823301-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 2,454.79 860.00 74.56 669.16 77.813301-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 190.84 Total Salaries and Benefits 87,205.00 7,907.05 70,388.30 0.00 16,816.70 80.72 3301-4200 Contract Services 340,000.00 0.00 146,200.38 99.993301-4201 Contract Serv/Private 193,770.24 29.38 Total Contract Services 340,000.00 0.00 146,200.38 193,770.24 29.38 99.99 3301-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 6,000.00 0.00 3,336.58 56.183301-4309 Maintenance Materials 34.32 2,629.10 221.00 18.00 162.00 73.303301-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 59.00 5,883.00 490.00 4,410.00 74.963301-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 1,473.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 12,104.00 508.00 7,908.58 34.32 4,161.10 65.62 3301-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3301-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Downtown Enhancement 439,309.00 8,415.05 224,497.26 193,804.56 21,007.18 95.22 20Page: Page 193 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 21 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Community Services3302 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3302-4100 Salaries and Benefits 1,160,250.00 98,844.56 853,187.37 73.533302-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 307,062.63 53,025.00 2,312.42 50,337.15 94.933302-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 2,687.85 28,095.00 106.30 32,347.19 115.143302-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -4,252.19 79,714.00 3,760.77 43,361.53 54.403302-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 36,352.47 3,576.00 495.00 4,673.00 130.683302-4117 Shift Differential 0.00 -1,097.00 2,288.00 0.00 2,287.51 99.983302-4118 Field Training Officer 0.00 0.49 508,941.00 44,330.35 397,441.58 78.093302-4180 Retirement 0.00 111,499.42 6,262.00 490.00 4,503.79 71.923302-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 1,758.21 290,654.00 26,046.28 215,673.17 74.203302-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 74,980.83 18,962.00 1,570.51 14,581.10 76.903302-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 4,380.90 Total Salaries and Benefits 2,151,767.00 177,956.19 1,618,393.39 0.00 533,373.61 75.21 3302-4200 Contract Services 767,716.00 66,915.86 383,401.25 62.303302-4201 Contract Serv/Private 94,913.98 289,400.77 90,186.00 22,546.50 90,186.00 100.003302-4251 Contract Services/Govt 0.00 0.00 Total Contract Services 857,902.00 89,462.36 473,587.25 94,913.98 289,400.77 66.27 3302-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 6,300.00 371.84 2,920.80 46.363302-4304 Telephone 0.00 3,379.20 9,000.00 10.36 9,366.16 104.303302-4305 Office Operating Supplies 21.24 -387.40 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4307 Radio Maintenance 0.00 1,000.00 1,800.00 69.36 649.37 36.083302-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 1,150.63 12,000.00 0.00 1,979.31 16.493302-4314 Uniforms 0.00 10,020.69 2,055.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4315 Membership 0.00 2,055.00 36,750.00 645.00 13,431.25 36.553302-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 23,318.75 74,850.00 6,237.00 56,133.00 74.993302-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 18,717.00 8,088.00 674.00 6,066.00 75.003302-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 2,022.00 172,334.00 14,361.17 129,250.53 75.003302-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 43,083.47 173,331.00 14,444.00 129,996.00 75.003302-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 43,335.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 497,508.00 36,812.73 349,792.42 21.24 147,694.34 70.31 21Page: Page 194 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 22 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Community Services3302 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3302-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3302-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3302-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Community Services 3,507,177.00 304,231.28 2,441,773.06 94,935.22 970,468.72 72.33 22Page: Page 195 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 23 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 North Pier Parking Structure3304 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3304-4200 Contract Services 180,081.00 47,178.84 88,140.62 65.833304-4201 Contract Serv/Private 30,401.47 61,538.91 225.00 0.00 0.00 0.003304-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 225.00 Total Contract Services 180,306.00 47,178.84 88,140.62 30,401.47 61,763.91 65.74 3304-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 58,850.00 2,125.34 31,655.10 53.793304-4303 Utilities 0.00 27,194.90 1,000.00 82.08 654.05 65.413304-4304 Telephone 0.00 345.95 2,500.00 0.00 840.00 33.603304-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 1,660.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 62,350.00 2,207.42 33,149.15 0.00 29,200.85 53.17 3304-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total North Pier Parking Structure 242,656.00 49,386.26 121,289.77 30,401.47 90,964.76 62.51 23Page: Page 196 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 24 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Downtown Parking Lot A3305 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3305-4200 Contract Services 67,900.00 6,833.76 60,187.22 96.063305-4201 Contract Serv/Private 5,038.21 2,674.57 Total Contract Services 67,900.00 6,833.76 60,187.22 5,038.21 2,674.57 96.06 3305-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003305-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 1,000.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 3305-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Downtown Parking Lot A 68,900.00 6,833.76 60,187.22 5,038.21 3,674.57 94.67 24Page: Page 197 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 25 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Co. Share Pkg Structure Rev.3306 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3306-4200 Contract Services 317,704.00 0.00 0.00 0.003306-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 317,704.00 Total Co. Share Pkg Structure Rev. 317,704.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 317,704.00 0.00 25Page: Page 198 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 26 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Community Dev/Planning4101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4101-4100 Salaries and Benefits 622,012.00 53,022.68 458,243.89 73.674101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 163,768.11 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.004101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -0.26 0.00 1,826.92 1,826.92 0.004101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -1,826.92 19,281.00 3,906.20 23,463.90 121.694101-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 -4,182.90 87,601.00 7,428.33 64,850.30 74.034101-4180 Retirement 0.00 22,750.70 300.00 25.00 225.00 75.004101-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 75.00 98,772.00 8,933.76 74,959.11 75.894101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 23,812.89 9,339.00 823.49 6,967.28 74.604101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 2,371.72 Total Salaries and Benefits 837,305.00 75,966.38 630,536.66 0.00 206,768.34 75.31 4101-4200 Contract Services 126,141.00 0.00 37,617.92 56.734101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 33,946.50 54,576.58 Total Contract Services 126,141.00 0.00 37,617.92 33,946.50 54,576.58 56.73 4101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,886.00 106.18 699.59 37.094101-4304 Telephone 0.00 1,186.41 13,000.00 294.75 3,071.20 57.184101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 4,362.31 5,566.49 1,276.00 0.00 1,152.80 90.344101-4314 Uniforms 0.00 123.20 6,952.00 845.80 1,121.77 16.144101-4315 Membership 0.00 5,830.23 12,133.00 0.00 5,124.59 42.244101-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 7,008.41 6,827.00 569.00 5,121.00 75.014101-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 1,706.00 2,234.00 186.00 1,674.00 74.934101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 560.00 62,815.00 5,235.00 47,115.00 75.014101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 15,700.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 107,123.00 7,236.73 65,079.95 4,362.31 37,680.74 64.82 Total Community Dev/Planning 1,070,569.00 83,203.11 733,234.53 38,308.81 299,025.66 72.07 26Page: Page 199 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 27 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Coastal Permit Auth Grant4104 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4104-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4104-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Coastal Permit Auth Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27Page: Page 200 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 28 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Zoning Ordinance Update4105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4105-4200 Contract Services 154,306.00 0.00 0.00 31.074105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 47,950.00 106,356.00 Total Zoning Ordinance Update 154,306.00 0.00 0.00 47,950.00 106,356.00 31.07 28Page: Page 201 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 29 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Housing Element Update4108 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4108-4200 Contract Services 59,809.00 0.00 0.00 0.004108-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 59,809.00 Total Housing Element Update 59,809.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59,809.00 0.00 29Page: Page 202 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 30 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Community Dev/Building4201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4201-4100 Salaries and Benefits 809,290.00 69,589.36 603,215.80 74.544201-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 206,074.20 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.004201-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -0.60 11,737.00 782.96 12,519.82 106.674201-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -782.82 130,828.00 11,182.87 98,131.12 75.014201-4180 Retirement 0.00 32,696.88 0.00 148.14 971.01 0.004201-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 432.99 -1,404.00 801.00 25.00 225.00 28.094201-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 576.00 145,421.00 13,272.96 108,450.79 74.584201-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 36,970.21 12,116.00 1,033.33 9,102.42 75.134201-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 3,013.58 Total Salaries and Benefits 1,110,193.00 96,034.62 832,616.56 432.99 277,143.45 75.04 4201-4200 Contract Services 384,709.00 69,430.05 241,682.94 81.074201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 70,184.70 72,841.36 Total Contract Services 384,709.00 69,430.05 241,682.94 70,184.70 72,841.36 81.07 4201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 10,530.00 531.13 10,102.02 95.944201-4304 Telephone 0.00 427.98 16,500.00 688.79 6,385.72 38.704201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 10,114.28 3,291.00 0.00 1,215.93 36.954201-4315 Membership 0.00 2,075.07 23,400.00 0.00 11,524.61 49.254201-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 11,875.39 0.00 0.00 300.63 0.004201-4329 Paypal Service Charges 0.00 -300.63 15,840.00 1,320.00 11,880.00 75.004201-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 3,960.00 1,409.00 117.00 1,053.00 74.734201-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 356.00 29,370.00 2,447.50 22,027.50 75.004201-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 7,342.50 76,734.00 6,395.00 57,555.00 75.014201-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 19,179.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 177,074.00 11,499.42 122,044.41 0.00 55,029.59 68.92 4201-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4201-5600 Buildings/Improvements 30Page: Page 203 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 31 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Community Dev/Building4201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Community Dev/Building 1,671,976.00 176,964.09 1,196,343.91 70,617.69 405,014.40 75.78 31Page: Page 204 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 32 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4100 Salaries and Benefits 920,047.00 87,233.15 690,827.26 75.094202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 229,219.74 3,084.00 630.23 714.24 23.164202-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 2,369.76 50,792.00 1,488.92 25,006.16 49.234202-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 25,785.84 87,072.00 9,889.20 65,121.60 74.794202-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 21,950.40 92,692.00 7,693.64 66,739.21 72.004202-4180 Retirement 0.00 25,952.79 0.00 26.60 174.28 0.004202-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 77.72 -252.00 58.00 5.00 43.00 74.144202-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 15.00 131,363.00 11,455.95 98,805.38 75.224202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 32,557.62 15,050.00 1,482.25 11,840.75 78.684202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 3,209.25 Total Salaries and Benefits 1,300,158.00 119,904.94 959,271.88 77.72 340,808.40 73.79 4202-4200 Contract Services 745,425.00 8,164.35 243,320.43 75.814202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 321,765.44 180,339.13 Total Contract Services 745,425.00 8,164.35 243,320.43 321,765.44 180,339.13 75.81 4202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 20,200.00 1,636.58 13,019.02 64.454202-4304 Telephone 0.00 7,180.98 30,000.00 2,384.67 20,464.60 78.114202-4305 Office Oper Supplies 2,968.21 6,567.19 17,000.00 432.53 9,446.17 55.574202-4314 Uniforms 0.00 7,553.83 4,556.00 0.00 742.99 18.504202-4315 Membership 100.00 3,713.01 25,000.00 875.04 3,822.76 19.024202-4317 Conference/Training 931.50 20,245.74 89,914.00 7,493.00 67,437.00 75.004202-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 22,477.00 6,478.00 540.00 4,860.00 75.024202-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 1,618.00 84,437.00 7,036.42 63,327.78 75.004202-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 21,109.22 795,193.00 66,266.00 596,394.00 75.004202-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 198,799.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 1,072,778.00 86,664.24 779,514.32 3,999.71 289,263.97 73.04 4202-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32Page: Page 205 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 33 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4202-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Public Works Administration 3,118,361.00 214,733.53 1,982,106.63 325,842.87 810,411.50 74.01 33Page: Page 206 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 34 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Building Maintenance4204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4204-4100 Salaries and Benefits 485,483.00 39,404.41 349,249.16 71.944204-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 136,233.84 88,930.00 1,530.23 82,949.32 93.274204-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 5,980.68 18,483.00 493.31 22,833.10 123.544204-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -4,350.10 27,909.00 0.00 27,909.19 100.004204-4112 Part Time Temporary 0.00 -0.19 136,140.00 12,718.45 114,130.01 83.834204-4180 Retirement 0.00 22,009.99 2,193.00 142.50 1,539.59 70.204204-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 653.41 92,835.00 7,465.41 72,355.34 77.944204-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 20,479.66 9,087.00 617.98 7,180.97 79.024204-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 1,906.03 Total Salaries and Benefits 861,060.00 62,372.29 678,146.68 0.00 182,913.32 78.76 4204-4200 Contract Services 433,520.00 35,831.52 170,417.50 65.474204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 113,397.29 149,705.21 225.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 225.00 Total Contract Services 433,745.00 35,831.52 170,417.50 113,397.29 149,930.21 65.43 4204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 312,132.00 21,272.53 198,740.40 63.674204-4303 Utilities 0.00 113,391.60 80,000.00 6,231.13 65,123.26 81.524204-4309 Maintenance Materials 95.70 14,781.04 0.00 439.17 3,434.63 0.004204-4321 Building Sfty/Security 0.00 -3,434.63 49,760.00 4,147.00 37,323.00 75.014204-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 12,437.00 667.00 56.00 504.00 75.564204-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 163.00 35,146.00 2,928.83 26,359.47 75.004204-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 8,786.53 283,014.00 23,585.00 212,265.00 75.004204-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 70,749.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 760,719.00 58,659.66 543,749.76 95.70 216,873.54 71.49 4204-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4204-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34Page: Page 207 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 35 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Building Maintenance4204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4204-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Building Maintenance 2,055,524.00 156,863.47 1,392,313.94 113,492.99 549,717.07 73.26 35Page: Page 208 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 36 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Community Resources4601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4601-4100 Salaries and Benefits 733,889.00 76,893.35 561,227.77 76.474601-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 172,661.23 10,909.00 0.00 10,909.34 100.004601-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.34 336,433.00 24,933.30 254,456.49 75.634601-4112 Part Time/Temporary 0.00 81,976.51 400.00 0.00 400.00 100.004601-4120 Additional Duties Pay 0.00 0.00 401,761.00 36,660.18 315,040.80 78.414601-4180 Retirement 0.00 86,720.20 132,251.00 9,862.01 80,745.28 61.054601-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 51,505.72 17,080.00 1,617.26 13,479.05 78.924601-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 3,600.95 Total Salaries and Benefits 1,632,723.00 149,966.10 1,236,258.73 0.00 396,464.27 75.72 4601-4200 Contract Services 187,225.00 31,202.85 136,695.32 74.914601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3,550.00 46,979.68 539,000.00 31,960.60 343,456.84 66.444601-4221 Contract Rec Classes/Programs 14,653.49 180,889.67 Total Contract Services 726,225.00 63,163.45 480,152.16 18,203.49 227,869.35 68.62 4601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4302 Advertising 0.00 2,000.00 3,075.00 198.78 2,605.16 84.724601-4304 Telephone 0.00 469.84 5,500.00 356.28 4,255.30 77.374601-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 1,244.70 15,650.00 1,568.51 9,998.00 64.114601-4308 Program Materials 35.47 5,616.53 3,610.00 0.00 2,500.00 89.614601-4315 Membership 735.00 375.00 5,633.00 10.35 3,149.42 60.444601-4317 Conference/Training 255.00 2,228.58 3,550.00 183.20 1,872.55 52.754601-4328 Hermosa Senior Center Programs 0.00 1,677.45 8,251.00 688.00 6,192.00 75.054601-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 0.00 2,059.00 35,237.00 2,936.00 26,424.00 74.994601-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 8,813.00 18,330.00 1,527.50 13,747.50 75.004601-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 4,582.50 157,026.00 13,086.00 117,774.00 75.004601-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 39,252.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 257,862.00 20,554.62 188,517.93 1,025.47 68,318.60 73.51 4601-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36Page: Page 209 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 37 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Community Resources4601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4601-5400 Equipment/Furniture 1,330.00 0.00 1,278.10 96.104601-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 51.90 Total Equipment/Furniture 1,330.00 0.00 1,278.10 0.00 51.90 96.10 4601-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Community Resources 2,618,140.00 233,684.17 1,906,206.92 19,228.96 692,704.12 73.54 37Page: Page 210 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 38 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Concert Series4604 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4604-4200 Contract Services 104,640.00 0.00 106,196.87 101.494604-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -1,556.87 Total Contract Services 104,640.00 0.00 106,196.87 0.00 -1,556.87 101.49 4604-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4,820.00 0.00 1,411.28 29.284604-4302 Advertising 0.00 3,408.72 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4,820.00 0.00 1,411.28 0.00 3,408.72 29.28 Total Concert Series 109,460.00 0.00 107,608.15 0.00 1,851.85 98.31 38Page: Page 211 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 39 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Parks6101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 6101-4100 Salaries and Benefits 418,082.00 38,658.07 316,886.01 75.806101-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 101,195.99 25,311.00 630.23 30,884.07 122.026101-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -5,573.07 15,886.00 0.00 15,886.35 100.006101-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.35 61,731.00 5,063.30 45,390.00 73.536101-4180 Retirement 0.00 16,341.00 1,437.00 120.00 1,077.00 74.956101-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 360.00 75,636.00 6,541.15 56,529.65 74.746101-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 19,106.35 6,776.00 597.70 5,395.05 79.626101-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 1,380.95 Total Salaries and Benefits 604,859.00 51,610.45 472,048.13 0.00 132,810.87 78.04 6101-4200 Contract Services 794,214.00 119,215.68 309,600.91 69.586101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 242,999.88 241,613.21 222.00 0.00 222.00 100.006101-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 0.00 Total Contract Services 794,436.00 119,215.68 309,822.91 242,999.88 241,613.21 69.59 6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 420,720.00 2,928.10 200,060.77 47.556101-4303 Utilities 0.00 220,659.23 100,000.00 3,587.37 73,123.85 74.916101-4309 Maintenance Materials 1,787.55 25,088.60 21,867.00 1,822.00 16,398.00 74.996101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 5,469.00 42,861.00 3,571.75 32,145.75 75.006101-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 10,715.25 204,085.00 17,007.00 153,063.00 75.006101-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 51,022.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 789,533.00 28,916.22 474,791.37 1,787.55 312,954.08 60.36 6101-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2,587.00 0.00 6,301.52 863.396101-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 16,034.36 -19,748.88 Total Equipment/Furniture 2,587.00 0.00 6,301.52 16,034.36 -19,748.88 863.39 6101-5600 Buildings/Improvements 39Page: Page 212 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 40 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Parks6101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Parks 2,191,415.00 199,742.35 1,262,963.93 260,821.79 667,629.28 69.53 40Page: Page 213 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 41 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 Prospect Undergrounding District8111 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8111-4200 Contract Services 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008111-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 500,000.00 Total Prospect Undergrounding District 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 41Page: Page 214 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 42 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 St Improv/Slurry & Crack Sealing-Various8112 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8112-4200 Contract Services 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008112-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 50,000.00 Total St Improv/Slurry & Crack Sealing-Various 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 42Page: Page 215 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 43 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 General Fund001 City Park Restrooms and Renovation8669 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8669-4200 Contract Services Total City Park Restrooms and Renovation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total General Fund 58,486,546.00 4,683,805.06 41,926,716.57 3,220,076.12 13,339,753.31 77.19 43Page: Page 216 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 44 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund105 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 11,054.00 921.17 8,290.53 75.001299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 2,763.47 Total Interfund Transfers Out 11,054.00 921.17 8,290.53 0.00 2,763.47 75.00 44Page: Page 217 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 45 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund105 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians2601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2601-4100 Salaries and Benefits 95,834.00 7,880.47 68,573.14 71.552601-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 27,260.86 14,457.00 100.00 11,163.48 77.222601-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 3,293.52 4,317.00 54.82 4,799.95 111.192601-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -482.95 33,001.00 2,873.40 25,638.03 77.692601-4180 Retirement 0.00 7,362.97 382.00 27.50 274.40 71.832601-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 107.60 18,477.00 1,571.99 14,137.87 76.522601-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 4,339.13 1,659.00 122.13 1,269.90 76.552601-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 389.10 Total Salaries and Benefits 168,127.00 12,630.31 125,856.77 0.00 42,270.23 74.86 2601-4200 Contract Services 208,209.00 42,243.41 109,308.73 86.092601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 69,938.29 28,961.98 36,889.00 0.00 13,094.79 35.502601-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 23,794.21 Total Contract Services 245,098.00 42,243.41 122,403.52 69,938.29 52,756.19 78.48 2601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 321,283.00 20,601.96 195,203.89 60.762601-4303 Utilities 0.00 126,079.11 42,000.00 968.13 32,318.13 78.622601-4309 Maintenance Materials 702.45 8,979.42 667.00 56.00 504.00 75.562601-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 163.00 59,562.00 4,963.50 44,671.50 75.002601-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 14,890.50 48,984.00 4,082.00 36,738.00 75.002601-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 12,246.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 472,496.00 30,671.59 309,435.52 702.45 162,358.03 65.64 Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 885,721.00 85,545.31 557,695.81 70,640.74 257,384.45 70.94 Total Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 896,775.00 86,466.48 565,986.34 70,640.74 260,147.92 70.99 45Page: Page 218 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 46 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 350,000.00 29,166.67 262,500.03 75.001299-4399 Operating Transfers Out 0.00 87,499.97 Total Interfund Transfers Out 350,000.00 29,166.67 262,500.03 0.00 87,499.97 75.00 46Page: Page 219 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 47 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 Street Maint/Traffic Safety3104 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3104-4200 Contract Services 150,000.00 0.00 53,100.25 37.403104-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2,992.75 93,907.00 Total Contract Services 150,000.00 0.00 53,100.25 2,992.75 93,907.00 37.40 3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3104-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Street Maint/Traffic Safety 150,000.00 0.00 53,100.25 2,992.75 93,907.00 37.40 47Page: Page 220 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 48 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4100 Salaries and Benefits 43,157.00 4,246.51 32,615.78 75.574202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 10,541.22 3,709.00 313.55 2,605.16 70.244202-4180 Retirement 0.00 1,103.84 6,079.00 528.72 4,458.29 73.344202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 1,620.71 631.00 61.64 488.63 77.444202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 142.37 Total Public Works Administration 53,576.00 5,150.42 40,167.86 0.00 13,408.14 74.97 48Page: Page 221 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 49 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 Annual Street Improvements8105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8105-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8105-4200 Contract Services 87,965.00 0.00 86,587.10 144.288105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 40,332.66 -38,954.76 Total Annual Street Improvements 87,965.00 0.00 86,587.10 40,332.66 -38,954.76 144.28 49Page: Page 222 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 50 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 Beach Drive Underground Dist8106 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8106-4200 Contract Services 600,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 600,000.00 Total Beach Drive Underground Dist 600,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600,000.00 0.00 50Page: Page 223 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 51 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 Annual City Sidewalk Improvements8112 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8112-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8112-4200 Contract Services Total Annual City Sidewalk Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51Page: Page 224 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 52 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 20th St/Valley Dr to Power St.8115 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8115-4200 Contract Services 9,931.00 0.00 0.00 0.008115-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 9,931.00 Total 20th St/Valley Dr to Power St. 9,931.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,931.00 0.00 52Page: Page 225 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 53 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 PCH Mobility Improvement Project8143 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8143-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8143-4200 Contract Services 12,375.00 0.00 0.00 100.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 12,375.00 0.00 Total PCH Mobility Improvement Project 12,375.00 0.00 0.00 12,375.00 0.00 100.00 53Page: Page 226 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 54 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 PCH Traffic Improvements8160 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8160-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8160-4200 Contract Services Total PCH Traffic Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54Page: Page 227 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 55 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 Street Improvement Various Locations8186 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8186-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8186-4200 Contract Services Total Street Improvement Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55Page: Page 228 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 56 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 Strand Bikeway/Walkway Improvments- 35th8188 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8188-4200 Contract Services Total Strand Bikeway/Walkway Improvments - 35th 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56Page: Page 229 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 57 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 Annual Street Improvements8190 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8190-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8190-4200 Contract Services Total Annual Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57Page: Page 230 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 58 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 Annual Street Improvements8191 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8191-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8191-4200 Contract Services Total Annual Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58Page: Page 231 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 59 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements8193 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8193-4200 Contract Services Total Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59Page: Page 232 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 60 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 State Gas Tax Fund115 City Sidewalk Improvements8195 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8195-4200 Contract Services Total City Sidewalk Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total State Gas Tax Fund 1,263,847.00 34,317.09 442,355.24 55,700.41 765,791.35 39.41 60Page: Page 233 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 61 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 TDA 3 Fund116 Beach Drive Underground Dist8106 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8106-4200 Contract Services 15,257.00 0.00 0.00 0.008106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 15,257.00 Total Beach Drive Underground Dist 15,257.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,257.00 0.00 61Page: Page 234 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 62 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 TDA 3 Fund116 St Improvements/Various #48193 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8193-4200 Contract Services Total St Improvements/Various #4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total TDA 3 Fund 15,257.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,257.00 0.00 62Page: Page 235 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 63 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 AB939 Fund117 Green Business Program1221 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1221-4200 Contract Services 20,000.00 0.00 2,500.00 13.501221-4201 Contract Serv/Private 200.00 17,300.00 Total Green Business Program 20,000.00 0.00 2,500.00 200.00 17,300.00 13.50 63Page: Page 236 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 64 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 AB939 Fund117 Source Redctn/Recycle Element5301 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 5301-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5301-4200 Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.005301-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,175.00 -1,175.00 Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,175.00 -1,175.00 0.00 5301-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3,500.00 0.00 3,557.13 101.635301-4315 Membership 0.00 -57.13 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3,500.00 0.00 3,557.13 0.00 -57.13 101.63 Total Source Redctn/Recycle Element 3,500.00 0.00 3,557.13 1,175.00 -1,232.13 135.20 Total AB939 Fund 23,500.00 0.00 6,057.13 1,375.00 16,067.87 31.63 64Page: Page 237 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 65 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Prop A Open Space Fund121 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Prop A Open Space Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65Page: Page 238 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 66 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 Bonnie Brae Underground Dist8105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8105-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8105-4200 Contract Services 39,426.00 0.00 34,825.90 100.008105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 4,600.00 0.10 Total Bonnie Brae Underground Dist 39,426.00 0.00 34,825.90 4,600.00 0.10 100.00 66Page: Page 239 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 67 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 Beach Drive Underground Dist8106 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8106-4200 Contract Services 600,000.00 0.00 35,246.00 11.758106-4201 Annual Street Improv Cont Svcs 35,246.00 529,508.00 Total Beach Drive Underground Dist 600,000.00 0.00 35,246.00 35,246.00 529,508.00 11.75 67Page: Page 240 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 68 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 Strand Bollards Permitting and Design8110 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8110-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8110-4200 Contract Services Total Strand Bollards Permitting and Design 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68Page: Page 241 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 69 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati8417 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8417-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8417-4200 Contract Services Total Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 69Page: Page 242 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 70 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 Greenbelt Pedestian Trail8502 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8502-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8502-4200 Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008502-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3,000.00 -3,000.00 Total Greenbelt Pedestian Trail 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 -3,000.00 0.00 70Page: Page 243 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 71 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 City Park Lighting Conceptual Design8503 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8503-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8503-4200 Contract Services Total City Park Lighting Conceptual Design 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71Page: Page 244 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 72 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 Police Facility Improvements8619 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8619-4200 Contract Services 250,000.00 0.00 237,500.00 100.008619-4201 Contract Serv/Private 12,500.00 0.00 Total Police Facility Improvements 250,000.00 0.00 237,500.00 12,500.00 0.00 100.00 72Page: Page 245 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 73 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 Pier Stuctural Inspection and Evaluation8623 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8623-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8623-4200 Contract Services 216,767.00 0.00 28,485.00 40.268623-4201 Contract Serv/Private 58,779.30 129,502.70 Total Pier Stuctural Inspection and Evaluation 216,767.00 0.00 28,485.00 58,779.30 129,502.70 40.26 73Page: Page 246 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 74 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 Municipal Pier Structural Assess/Repair8629 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8629-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8629-4200 Contract Services Total Municipal Pier Structural Assess /Repair 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74Page: Page 247 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 75 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs8660 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8660-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8660-4200 Contract Services Total Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75Page: Page 248 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 76 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 Clark Building Renovations8689 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8689-4200 Contract Services 0.00 0.00 11,241.60 0.008689-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -11,241.60 Total Clark Building Renovations 0.00 0.00 11,241.60 0.00 -11,241.60 0.00 76Page: Page 249 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 77 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 14th Street Beach Restroom Improvements8692 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8692-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8692-4200 Contract Services Total 14th Street Beach Restroom Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 77Page: Page 250 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 78 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Fund122 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements8699 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8699-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8699-4200 Contract Services 1,026,916.00 12,969.40 656,678.00 67.318699-4201 Contract Serv/Private 34,562.00 335,676.00 Total Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements 1,026,916.00 12,969.40 656,678.00 34,562.00 335,676.00 67.31 Total Tyco Fund 2,133,109.00 12,969.40 1,003,976.50 148,687.30 980,445.20 54.04 78Page: Page 251 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 79 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Tyco Tidelands123 Municipal Pier Structural Assess/Repair8629 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8629-4200 Contract Services Total Tyco Tidelands 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79Page: Page 252 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 80 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Kelly Tennis Court8504 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8504-4200 Contract Services 70,000.00 58,677.66 58,677.66 83.838504-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 11,322.34 Total Kelly Tennis Court 70,000.00 58,677.66 58,677.66 0.00 11,322.34 83.83 80Page: Page 253 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 81 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Citywide Park Master Plan8538 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8538-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8538-4200 Contract Services Total Citywide Park Master Plan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 81Page: Page 254 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 82 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 South Park Slope, Irrigation, Landscape8603 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8603-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8603-4200 Contract Services 9,596.00 0.00 3,248.00 100.018603-4201 Contract Serv/Private 6,348.50 -0.50 Total South Park Slope, Irrigation, Landscape 9,596.00 0.00 3,248.00 6,348.50 -0.50 100.01 82Page: Page 255 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 83 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 Kelly Courts Improvements8619 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8619-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8619-4200 Contract Services 310,000.00 0.00 294,500.01 100.008619-4201 Contract Serv/Private 15,499.99 0.00 Total Kelly Courts Improvements 310,000.00 0.00 294,500.01 15,499.99 0.00 100.00 83Page: Page 256 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 84 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund125 14th Street Beach Restroom Improvements8692 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8692-4200 Contract Services Total 14th Street Beach Restroom Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 389,596.00 58,677.66 356,425.67 21,848.49 11,321.84 97.09 84Page: Page 257 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 85 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund135 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services 1,900.00 0.00 0.00 0.001219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 1,900.00 Total Administrative Charges 1,900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,900.00 0.00 85Page: Page 258 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 86 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund135 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Interfund Transfers Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund 1,900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,900.00 0.00 86Page: Page 259 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 87 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund138 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 87Page: Page 260 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 88 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund139 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services Total Administrative Charges 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 88Page: Page 261 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 89 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund139 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 89Page: Page 262 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 90 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Community Dev Block Grant140 Prospect Ave Curb Ramps8601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8601-4200 Contract Services Total Prospect Ave Curb Ramps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90Page: Page 263 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 91 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Community Dev Block Grant140 Longfellow Sidewalk Improvements8606 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8606-4200 Contract Services Total Longfellow Sidewalk Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91Page: Page 264 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 92 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Community Dev Block Grant140 CDBG Improvements8624 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8624-4200 Contract Services Total CDBG Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92Page: Page 265 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 93 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Community Dev Block Grant140 ADA Comp/Comm Ctr Theatre8626 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8626-4200 Contract Services 184,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008626-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 184,000.00 Total ADA Comp/Comm Ctr Theatre 184,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 184,000.00 0.00 93Page: Page 266 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 94 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Community Dev Block Grant140 ADA Improvement8698 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8698-4200 Contract Services Total ADA Improvement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Community Dev Block Grant 184,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 184,000.00 0.00 94Page: Page 267 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 95 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition A Fund145 Bus Pass Subsidy3403 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3403-4200 Contract Services Total Bus Pass Subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95Page: Page 268 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 96 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition A Fund145 Dial-A-Taxi Program3404 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3404-4200 Contract Services 22,000.00 1,206.47 9,343.05 100.003404-4201 Dial-A-Taxi Program 12,656.95 0.00 Total Dial-A-Taxi Program 22,000.00 1,206.47 9,343.05 12,656.95 0.00 100.00 96Page: Page 269 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 97 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition A Fund145 Fund Exchange3405 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3405-4200 Contract Services Total Fund Exchange 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 97Page: Page 270 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 98 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition A Fund145 Commuter Express3408 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3408-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3408-4200 Contract Services 49,877.00 0.00 0.00 0.003408-4251 Commuter Express 0.00 49,877.00 Total Commuter Express 49,877.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,877.00 0.00 98Page: Page 271 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 99 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition A Fund145 Recreation Transportation3409 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3409-4200 Contract Services 46,000.00 0.00 33,597.46 73.043409-4201 Recreation Transportation 0.00 12,402.54 Total Recreation Transportation 46,000.00 0.00 33,597.46 0.00 12,402.54 73.04 99Page: Page 272 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 100 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition A Fund145 Special Event Shuttle3410 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3410-4200 Contract Services 35,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003410-4201 Special Event Shuttle 0.00 35,000.00 Total Special Event Shuttle 35,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,000.00 0.00 100Page: Page 273 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 101 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition A Fund145 Beach Cities Transit Line 1093412 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3412-4200 Contract Services 17,200.00 0.00 8,591.50 99.903412-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 8,591.50 17.00 Total Beach Cities Transit Line 109 17,200.00 0.00 8,591.50 8,591.50 17.00 99.90 101Page: Page 274 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 102 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition A Fund145 Employee Public Transportation Reimburse3416 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3416-4200 Contract Services 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.003416-4201 Employee Public Trans Reimb 0.00 -160.00 Total Employee Public Transportation Reimburse 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 -160.00 0.00 102Page: Page 275 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 103 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition A Fund145 Hermosa Ave Greenwich Village St Realign8101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8101-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Hermosa Ave Greenwich Village St Realign 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 103Page: Page 276 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 104 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition A Fund145 Bus Stop Improvements8102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8102-4200 Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 324,251.50 -324,251.50 Total Bus Stop Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 324,251.50 -324,251.50 0.00 Total Proposition A Fund 170,077.00 1,206.47 51,692.01 345,499.95 -227,114.96 233.54 104Page: Page 277 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 105 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition C Fund146 Crossing Guard2102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2102-4200 Contract Services 338,512.00 0.00 190,275.82 93.152102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 125,039.18 23,197.00 Total Crossing Guard 338,512.00 0.00 190,275.82 125,039.18 23,197.00 93.15 105Page: Page 278 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 106 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition C Fund146 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4100 Salaries and Benefits 25,092.00 2,803.54 18,249.22 72.734202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 6,842.78 2,642.00 296.62 1,990.34 75.334202-4180 Retirement 0.00 651.66 2,960.00 272.41 2,134.06 72.104202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 825.94 372.00 41.25 272.44 73.244202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 99.56 Total Public Works Administration 31,066.00 3,413.82 22,646.06 0.00 8,419.94 72.90 106Page: Page 279 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 107 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition C Fund146 Protective Bollards at Pier Plaza8101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8101-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8101-4200 Contract Services Total Protective Bollards at Pier Plaza 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 107Page: Page 280 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 108 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition C Fund146 Bus Stop Improvements8102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8102-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8102-4200 Contract Services 372,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 372,000.00 Total Bus Stop Improvements 372,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 372,000.00 0.00 108Page: Page 281 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 109 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition C Fund146 Bonnie Brae Underground Dist8105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8105-4200 Contract Services 31,658.00 0.00 31,658.45 100.008105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -0.45 Total Bonnie Brae Underground Dist 31,658.00 0.00 31,658.45 0.00 -0.45 100.00 109Page: Page 282 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 110 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition C Fund146 Beach Drive Underground Dist8106 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8106-4200 Contract Services 206,807.00 0.00 0.00 0.008106-4201 Annual Street Improv Cont Svcs 0.00 206,807.00 Total Beach Drive Underground Dist 206,807.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 206,807.00 0.00 110Page: Page 283 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 111 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition C Fund146 Annual City Sidewalk Improvements8112 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8112-4200 Contract Services Total Annual City Sidewalk Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 111Page: Page 284 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 112 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition C Fund146 20th St/Valley Dr to Power St.8115 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8115-4200 Contract Services 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008115-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 25,000.00 Total 20th St/Valley Dr to Power St. 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 112Page: Page 285 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 113 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Proposition C Fund146 Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements8193 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8193-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8193-4200 Contract Services 110,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008193-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 110,000.00 Total Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements 110,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110,000.00 0.00 Total Proposition C Fund 1,115,043.00 3,413.82 244,580.33 125,039.18 745,423.49 33.15 113Page: Page 286 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 114 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure R Fund147 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4100 Salaries and Benefits 2,847.00 280.18 2,158.14 75.804202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 688.86 429.00 39.49 316.16 73.704202-4180 Retirement 0.00 112.84 398.00 33.86 297.02 74.634202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 100.98 41.00 4.08 31.85 77.684202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 9.15 Total Public Works Administration 3,715.00 357.61 2,803.17 0.00 911.83 75.46 114Page: Page 287 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 115 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure R Fund147 Annual Street Improvements8105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8105-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8105-4200 Contract Services 95,330.00 0.00 95,330.11 100.008105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -0.11 Total Annual Street Improvements 95,330.00 0.00 95,330.11 0.00 -0.11 100.00 115Page: Page 288 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 116 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure R Fund147 Beach Drive Underground Dist8106 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8106-4200 Contract Services 540,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008106-4201 Annual Street Improv Cont Svcs 0.00 540,000.00 Total Beach Drive Underground Dist 540,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 540,000.00 0.00 116Page: Page 289 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 117 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure R Fund147 PCH Mobility Improvement Project8143 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8143-4200 Contract Services 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008143-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 30,000.00 Total PCH Mobility Improvement Project 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 117Page: Page 290 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 118 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure R Fund147 Street Improvement Various Locations8186 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8186-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8186-4200 Contract Services Total Street Improvement Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 118Page: Page 291 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 119 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure R Fund147 Annual Street Improvements8191 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8191-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8191-4200 Contract Services Total Annual Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 119Page: Page 292 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 120 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure R Fund147 Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements8193 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8193-4200 Contract Services Total Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120Page: Page 293 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 121 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure R Fund147 Annual Striping Improvements8194 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8194-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8194-4200 Contract Services Total Annual Striping Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121Page: Page 294 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 122 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure R Fund147 City Sidewalk Improvements8195 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8195-4200 Contract Services Total City Sidewalk Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Measure R Fund 669,045.00 357.61 98,133.28 0.00 570,911.72 14.67 122Page: Page 295 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 123 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure M148 Annual Street Improvements8105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8105-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8105-4200 Contract Services 28,705.00 0.00 28,705.25 100.008105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -0.25 Total Annual Street Improvements 28,705.00 0.00 28,705.25 0.00 -0.25 100.00 123Page: Page 296 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 124 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure M148 Beach Drive Underground Dist8106 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8106-4200 Contract Services 370,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008106-4201 Annual St Improv Cont Svcs 0.00 370,000.00 Total Beach Drive Underground Dist 370,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 370,000.00 0.00 124Page: Page 297 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 125 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure M148 Street Improvement Various Locations8186 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8186-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8186-4200 Contract Services Total Street Improvement Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 125Page: Page 298 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 126 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure M148 Strand Bikeway/Walkway Improvments- 35th8188 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8188-4200 Contract Services Total Strand Bikeway/Walkway Improvments - 35th 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 126Page: Page 299 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 127 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure M148 Annual Street Improvements8191 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8191-4200 Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008191-4201 Contract Serv/Private 22,275.78 -22,275.78 Total Annual Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,275.78 -22,275.78 0.00 127Page: Page 300 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 128 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure M148 City Sidewalk Improvements8195 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8195-4200 Contract Services Total City Sidewalk Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Measure M 398,705.00 0.00 28,705.25 22,275.78 347,723.97 12.79 128Page: Page 301 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 129 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure W Fund149 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4100 Salaries and Benefits 17,410.00 1,900.10 12,709.13 73.004202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 4,700.87 1,690.00 184.47 1,259.93 74.554202-4180 Retirement 0.00 430.07 2,128.00 193.78 1,540.78 72.414202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 587.22 258.00 28.02 190.63 73.894202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 67.37 Total Public Works Administration 21,486.00 2,306.37 15,700.47 0.00 5,785.53 73.07 129Page: Page 302 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 130 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure W Fund149 Hermosa Ave Green Street8164 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8164-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8164-4200 Contract Services 123,262.00 0.00 128,868.00 104.558164-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -5,606.00 Total Hermosa Ave Green Street 123,262.00 0.00 128,868.00 0.00 -5,606.00 104.55 130Page: Page 303 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 131 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure W Fund149 Stormwater Dry Wells8438 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8438-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8438-4200 Contract Services 175,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008438-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 175,000.00 Total Stormwater Dry Wells 175,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 175,000.00 0.00 131Page: Page 304 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 132 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure W Fund149 Electrical Vehicle & Bicycle Transportat8682 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8682-4200 Contract Services Total Electrical Vehicle & Bicycle Transportat 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 132Page: Page 305 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 133 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Measure W Fund149 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements8699 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8699-4200 Contract Services 69,370.00 0.00 0.00 100.008699-4201 Contract Serv/Private 69,370.00 0.00 Total Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements 69,370.00 0.00 0.00 69,370.00 0.00 100.00 Total Measure W Fund 389,118.00 2,306.37 144,568.47 69,370.00 175,179.53 54.98 133Page: Page 306 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 134 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 City Manager1201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1201-4200 Contract Services 420,933.00 0.00 122,446.51 99.981201-4201 Mobile Mental Health 298,397.46 89.03 Total City Manager 420,933.00 0.00 122,446.51 298,397.46 89.03 99.98 134Page: Page 307 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 135 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Beach Cities Health District (BCHD)Grant1222 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1222-4200 Contract Services 50,000.00 449.98 8,671.67 17.341222-4201 BCHD Opioid Remediation 0.00 41,328.33 Total Beach Cities Health District (BCHD)Grant 50,000.00 449.98 8,671.67 0.00 41,328.33 17.34 135Page: Page 308 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 136 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 CalRecycle SB1383 Grant1225 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1225-4200 Contract Services 7,488.00 0.00 0.00 71.881225-4201 CaRecycle SB1383 Grant 5,382.50 2,105.50 Total CalRecycle SB1383 Grant 7,488.00 0.00 0.00 5,382.50 2,105.50 71.88 136Page: Page 309 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 137 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Hazard Mitigation Program1227 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1227-4200 Contract Services Total Hazard Mitigation Program 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 137Page: Page 310 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 138 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 State Homeland Sec Grant/Police2109 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2109-4200 Contract Services 0.00 0.00 120,213.57 0.002109-4201 2023 (SHSP) State Home Sec Prog Grant 0.00 -120,213.57 Total State Homeland Sec Grant/Police 0.00 0.00 120,213.57 0.00 -120,213.57 0.00 138Page: Page 311 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 139 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 BCHD Dom Violence Advocacy Pgm2110 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2110-4200 Contract Services 65,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.002110-4201 SHSP Grant 2024 0.00 65,000.00 Total BCHD Dom Violence Advocacy Pgm 65,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65,000.00 0.00 139Page: Page 312 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 140 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Bulletproof Vest Partnership2111 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2111-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 452.96 0.002111-4350 Safety Gear 0.00 -452.96 Total Bulletproof Vest Partnership 0.00 0.00 452.96 0.00 -452.96 0.00 140Page: Page 313 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 141 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Ticket Writer/Traffic Mgmt Grant2114 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2114-4200 Contract Services 80,000.00 0.00 5,678.55 7.882114-4201 OTS-STEP Traffic Enforce Grant 627.82 73,693.63 Total Ticket Writer/Traffic Mgmt Grant 80,000.00 0.00 5,678.55 627.82 73,693.63 7.88 141Page: Page 314 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 142 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Body Worn Camera2119 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2119-4200 Contract Services Total Body Worn Camera 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 142Page: Page 315 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 143 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 St Homeland Security Prg- Radio Upgrades2120 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2120-4200 Contract Services Total St Homeland Security Prg- Radio Upgrades 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 143Page: Page 316 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 144 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 BCHD Domestic Violence Advocate Grant2122 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2122-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total BCHD Domestic Violence Advocate Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 144Page: Page 317 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 145 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 ABC Alcoholic Police Grant2123 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2123-4200 Contract Services Total ABC Alcoholic Police Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 145Page: Page 318 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 146 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Officer Wellness Grant2124 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2124-4200 Contract Services 0.00 0.00 8,652.77 0.002124-4201 Contract Serv/Private 608.07 -9,260.84 Total Officer Wellness Grant 0.00 0.00 8,652.77 608.07 -9,260.84 0.00 146Page: Page 319 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 147 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Zoning Ordinance Update4105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4105-4200 Contract Services Total Zoning Ordinance Update 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 147Page: Page 320 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 148 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Housing Element Update4108 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4108-4200 Contract Services Total Housing Element Update 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 148Page: Page 321 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 149 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 *** Title Not Found ***6001 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 6001-4200 Contract Services 583,307.00 0.00 0.00 0.006001-4201 OPC SLRAP Grant (Doug) 0.00 583,307.00 Total *** Title Not Found *** 583,307.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 583,307.00 0.00 149Page: Page 322 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 150 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Parks6101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Parks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150Page: Page 323 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 151 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Bonnie Brae Underground Dist8105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8105-4200 Contract Services 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008105-4201 Street Improv - Rubber Grant Component 0.00 50,000.00 Total Bonnie Brae Underground Dist 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 151Page: Page 324 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 152 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 St Imp/21st Btwn PCH/Ardmore8184 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8184-4200 Contract Services Total St Imp/21st Btwn PCH/Ardmore 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 152Page: Page 325 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 153 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 ADA Improvements- PCH between 2nd & 21st8185 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8185-4200 Contract Services Total ADA Improvements- PCH between 2nd & 21st 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 153Page: Page 326 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 154 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Prospect Pk Development8502 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8502-4200 Contract Services Total Prospect Pk Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 154Page: Page 327 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 155 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 South Park Slope, Irrigation, Landscape8603 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8603-4200 Contract Services 105,734.00 0.00 9,492.45 8.988603-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 96,241.55 Total South Park Slope, Irrigation, Landscape 105,734.00 0.00 9,492.45 0.00 96,241.55 8.98 155Page: Page 328 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 156 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Tsunami Siren8618 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8618-4200 Contract Services 75,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008618-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 75,000.00 Total Tsunami Siren 75,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75,000.00 0.00 156Page: Page 329 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 157 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Municipal Pier Structural Assess/Repair8629 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8629-4200 Contract Services Total Municipal Pier Structural Assess /Repair 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 157Page: Page 330 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 158 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs8660 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8660-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8660-4200 Contract Services Total Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 158Page: Page 331 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 159 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Parking Lot D Improvements8682 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8682-4200 Contract Services Total Parking Lot D Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 159Page: Page 332 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 160 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Grants Fund150 Real Time Crime Center8685 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8685-4200 Contract Services 811,061.00 0.00 160,036.85 90.438685-4201 Contract Serv/Private 573,439.99 77,584.16 Total Real Time Crime Center 811,061.00 0.00 160,036.85 573,439.99 77,584.16 90.43 Total Grants Fund 2,248,523.00 449.98 435,645.33 878,455.84 934,421.83 58.44 160Page: Page 333 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 161 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund152 Emission Control3701 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3701-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 15,000.00 630.00 4,560.00 30.403701-4327 AQMD Incentives 0.00 10,440.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 15,000.00 630.00 4,560.00 0.00 10,440.00 30.40 3701-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3701-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 15,000.00 630.00 4,560.00 0.00 10,440.00 30.40 161Page: Page 334 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 162 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)153 C.O.P.S. Program2106 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2106-4200 Contract Services 111,133.00 33,855.66 71,036.38 74.102106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 11,315.00 28,781.62 Total Contract Services 111,133.00 33,855.66 71,036.38 11,315.00 28,781.62 74.10 2106-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 15,000.00 327.04 2,721.61 25.772106-4350 Safety Gear 1,144.33 11,134.06 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 15,000.00 327.04 2,721.61 1,144.33 11,134.06 25.77 2106-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF) 126,133.00 34,182.70 73,757.99 12,459.33 39,915.68 68.35 162Page: Page 335 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 163 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 FEMA/Cal OES157 Emergency Management Response COVID-192702 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2702-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2702-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2702-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2702-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total FEMA/Cal OES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 163Page: Page 336 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 164 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 CARES Act158 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total CARES Act 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 164Page: Page 337 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 165 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)159 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 165Page: Page 338 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 166 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Sewer Fund160 Administrative Charges1219 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1219-4200 Contract Services 0.00 0.00 1,767.25 0.001219-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 -1,767.25 Total Administrative Charges 0.00 0.00 1,767.25 0.00 -1,767.25 0.00 166Page: Page 339 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 167 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Sewer Fund160 Sewers/Storm Drains3102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3102-4100 Salaries and Benefits 208,291.00 16,663.41 158,438.67 76.073102-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 49,852.33 3,375.00 1,890.68 5,924.54 175.543102-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -2,549.54 10,568.00 0.00 10,568.03 100.003102-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.03 35,811.00 2,868.64 26,379.50 73.663102-4180 Retirement 0.00 9,431.50 238.00 20.00 178.00 74.793102-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 60.00 31,939.00 2,551.67 24,480.95 76.653102-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 7,458.05 3,339.00 280.64 2,631.79 78.823102-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 707.21 Total Salaries and Benefits 293,561.00 24,275.04 228,601.48 0.00 64,959.52 77.87 3102-4200 Contract Services 364,700.00 2,822.58 197,789.88 66.923102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 46,273.80 120,636.32 4,376.00 0.00 3,945.00 90.153102-4251 Contract Service/Govt 0.00 431.00 Total Contract Services 369,076.00 2,822.58 201,734.88 46,273.80 121,067.32 67.20 3102-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 10,000.00 337.48 3,591.07 44.963102-4309 Maintenance Materials 904.88 5,504.05 267.00 22.00 198.00 74.163102-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 69.00 31,403.00 2,616.92 23,552.28 75.003102-4395 Equip Replacement Charges 0.00 7,850.72 79,536.00 6,628.00 59,652.00 75.003102-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 19,884.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 121,206.00 9,604.40 86,993.35 904.88 33,307.77 72.52 3102-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Sewers/Storm Drains 783,843.00 36,702.02 517,329.71 47,178.68 219,334.61 72.02 167Page: Page 340 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 168 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Sewer Fund160 Used Oil Block Grant3105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3105-4200 Contract Services Total Used Oil Block Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 168Page: Page 341 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 169 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Sewer Fund160 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4100 Salaries and Benefits 97,890.00 10,787.71 71,821.63 73.374202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 26,068.37 10,023.00 1,093.75 7,462.46 74.454202-4180 Retirement 0.00 2,560.54 11,875.00 1,080.52 8,600.08 72.424202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 3,274.92 1,449.00 158.82 1,072.17 73.994202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 376.83 Total Public Works Administration 121,237.00 13,120.80 88,956.34 0.00 32,280.66 73.37 169Page: Page 342 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 170 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Sewer Fund160 Sewer Improvements Various Locations8416 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8416-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8416-4200 Contract Services Total Sewer Improvements Various Locations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 170Page: Page 343 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 171 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Sewer Fund160 Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati8417 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8417-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 171Page: Page 344 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 172 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Sewer Fund160 Annual Sewer Improvements8421 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8421-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8421-4200 Contract Services 1,765,884.00 0.00 948,526.43 72.328421-4201 Contract Serv/Private 328,487.51 488,870.06 Total Annual Sewer Improvements 1,765,884.00 0.00 948,526.43 328,487.51 488,870.06 72.32 172Page: Page 345 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 173 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Sewer Fund160 Annual Sewer Improvements8423 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8423-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8423-4200 Contract Services 1,011,003.00 0.00 0.00 0.008423-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 1,011,003.00 Total Contract Services 1,011,003.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,011,003.00 0.00 8423-5400 Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 35,148.79 0.008423-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 -35,148.79 Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 35,148.79 0.00 -35,148.79 0.00 Total Annual Sewer Improvements 1,011,003.00 0.00 35,148.79 0.00 975,854.21 3.48 173Page: Page 346 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 174 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Sewer Fund160 City Park Restrooms and Renovation8669 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8669-4200 Contract Services Total City Park Restrooms and Renovation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174Page: Page 347 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 175 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Sewer Fund160 14th Street Beach Restroom Rehab8692 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8692-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8692-4200 Contract Services Total 14th Street Beach Restroom Rehab 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Sewer Fund 3,681,967.00 49,822.82 1,591,728.52 375,666.19 1,714,572.29 53.43 175Page: Page 348 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 176 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Storm Drains Fund161 Storm Drain3109 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3109-4100 Salaries and Benefits 226,935.00 22,631.59 167,698.56 73.903109-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 59,236.44 3,374.00 1,260.46 5,294.31 156.913109-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 -1,920.31 6,720.00 0.00 6,720.04 100.003109-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.04 38,101.00 3,570.53 28,767.43 75.503109-4180 Retirement 0.00 9,333.57 238.00 20.00 178.00 74.793109-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 60.00 34,158.00 3,049.11 25,184.81 73.733109-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 8,973.19 3,507.00 354.66 2,665.14 75.993109-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 841.86 Total Salaries and Benefits 313,033.00 30,886.35 236,508.29 0.00 76,524.71 75.55 3109-4200 Contract Services 330,278.00 2,073.00 51,064.12 41.563109-4201 Contract Serv/Private 86,213.64 193,000.24 11,000.00 0.00 10,920.00 99.273109-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 0.00 80.00 Total Contract Services 341,278.00 2,073.00 61,984.12 86,213.64 193,080.24 43.42 3109-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 8,000.00 2,439.82 4,269.49 53.373109-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 3,730.51 400.00 33.00 297.00 74.253109-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 0.00 103.00 38,503.00 3,208.58 28,877.22 75.003109-4395 Equip Replacement Chrgs 0.00 9,625.78 35,797.00 2,983.00 26,847.00 75.003109-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 8,950.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 82,700.00 8,664.40 60,290.71 0.00 22,409.29 72.90 3109-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Storm Drain 737,011.00 41,623.75 358,783.12 86,213.64 292,014.24 60.38 176Page: Page 349 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 177 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Storm Drains Fund161 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4100 Salaries and Benefits 103,311.00 11,792.92 75,169.55 72.764202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 28,141.45 10,991.00 1,274.07 8,278.91 75.324202-4180 Retirement 0.00 2,712.09 11,948.00 1,098.14 8,633.77 72.264202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 3,314.23 1,536.00 174.23 1,119.14 72.864202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 416.86 Total Public Works Administration 127,786.00 14,339.36 93,201.37 0.00 34,584.63 72.94 177Page: Page 350 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 178 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Storm Drains Fund161 Hermosa Ave Green Street8164 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8164-4200 Contract Services 245,024.00 0.00 239,417.56 97.718164-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 5,606.44 Total Hermosa Ave Green Street 245,024.00 0.00 239,417.56 0.00 5,606.44 97.71 178Page: Page 351 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 179 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Storm Drains Fund161 Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati8417 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8417-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8417-4200 Contract Services 827,421.00 0.00 104,125.00 12.588417-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 723,296.00 Total Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati 827,421.00 0.00 104,125.00 0.00 723,296.00 12.58 179Page: Page 352 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 180 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Storm Drains Fund161 Annual Storm Drain Improvements8422 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8422-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8422-4200 Contract Services Total Annual Storm Drain Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 180Page: Page 353 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 181 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Storm Drains Fund161 Sewer Improvements8423 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8423-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Sewer Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 181Page: Page 354 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 182 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Storm Drains Fund161 Annual Storm Drain Improvements8424 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8424-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8424-4200 Contract Services Total Annual Storm Drain Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 182Page: Page 355 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 183 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Storm Drains Fund161 Parking Lot D Improvements8682 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8682-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8682-4200 Contract Services Total Parking Lot D Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 183Page: Page 356 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 184 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Storm Drains Fund161 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements8699 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8699-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8699-4200 Contract Services 124,800.00 118,560.00 118,560.00 100.008699-4201 Contract Serv/Private 6,240.00 0.00 Total Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements 124,800.00 118,560.00 118,560.00 6,240.00 0.00 100.00 Total Storm Drains Fund 2,062,042.00 174,523.11 914,087.05 92,453.64 1,055,501.31 48.81 184Page: Page 357 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 185 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund170 Police K-9 Program2105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2105-4200 Contract Services 5,000.00 0.00 17,123.81 403.752105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3,063.50 -15,187.31 Total Contract Services 5,000.00 0.00 17,123.81 3,063.50 -15,187.31 403.75 2105-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,000.00 0.00 228.63 22.862105-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 771.37 6,000.00 0.00 1,892.00 79.932105-4317 Conference/Training 2,904.00 1,204.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 7,000.00 0.00 2,120.63 2,904.00 1,975.37 71.78 2105-5400 Equipment/Furniture 250.00 11,868.20 41,226.27 19,739.942105-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 8,123.58 -49,099.85 0.00 0.00 41,163.51 0.002105-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 -41,163.51 0.00 0.00 9,816.68 0.002105-5403 Vehicles 0.00 -9,816.68 0.00 0.00 11,219.08 0.002105-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 200.00 -11,419.08 Total Equipment/Furniture 250.00 11,868.20 103,425.54 8,323.58 -111,499.12 44,699.65 Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 12,250.00 11,868.20 122,669.98 14,291.08 -124,711.06 1,118.05 185Page: Page 358 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 186 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Undersea Cable190 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4100 Salaries and Benefits 63,941.00 7,058.62 47,043.63 73.574202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 16,897.37 6,749.00 733.43 5,020.04 74.384202-4180 Retirement 0.00 1,728.96 7,782.00 704.42 5,649.14 72.594202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 2,132.86 947.00 103.90 700.97 74.024202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 246.03 Total Public Works Administration 79,419.00 8,600.37 58,413.78 0.00 21,005.22 73.55 186Page: Page 359 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 187 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Undersea Cable190 Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati8417 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8417-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8417-4200 Contract Services Total Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 187Page: Page 360 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 188 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Undersea Cable190 99-00 Allocation8623 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8623-4200 Contract Services Total 99-00 Allocation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 188Page: Page 361 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 189 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Undersea Cable190 Municipal Pier Structural Assess/Repair8629 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8629-4200 Contract Services Total Municipal Pier Structural Assess /Repair 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 189Page: Page 362 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 190 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Undersea Cable190 Parking Lot A Improvements8695 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8695-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8695-4200 Contract Services 16,166.00 0.00 16,165.81 100.008695-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.02 0.17 Total Parking Lot A Improvements 16,166.00 0.00 16,165.81 0.02 0.17 100.00 190Page: Page 363 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 191 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Undersea Cable190 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements8699 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8699-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8699-4200 Contract Services 1,109,288.00 190,837.62 282,686.81 100.008699-4201 Contract Serv/Private 826,601.19 0.00 Total Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements 1,109,288.00 190,837.62 282,686.81 826,601.19 0.00 100.00 Total RTI Undersea Cable 1,204,873.00 199,437.99 357,266.40 826,601.21 21,005.39 98.26 191Page: Page 364 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 192 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Tidelands191 Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati8417 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8417-4200 Contract Services Total Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 192Page: Page 365 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 193 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Tidelands191 99-00 Allocation8623 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8623-4200 Contract Services 272,007.00 0.00 89,985.65 138.938623-4201 Contract Serv/Private 287,926.35 -105,905.00 Total 99-00 Allocation 272,007.00 0.00 89,985.65 287,926.35 -105,905.00 138.93 193Page: Page 366 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 194 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Tidelands191 Municipal Pier Structural Assess/Repair8629 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8629-4200 Contract Services Total Municipal Pier Structural Assess /Repair 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 194Page: Page 367 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 195 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Tidelands191 Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs8660 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8660-4200 Contract Services Total Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 195Page: Page 368 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 196 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Tidelands191 Parking Lot A Improvements8695 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8695-4200 Contract Services Total Parking Lot A Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 196Page: Page 369 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 197 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 RTI Tidelands191 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements8699 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8699-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8699-4200 Contract Services Total Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total RTI Tidelands 272,007.00 0.00 89,985.65 287,926.35 -105,905.00 138.93 197Page: Page 370 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 198 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds201 Legal Settlements- E&B Resources1220 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1220-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1220-6700 Interest 258,200.00 119,178.39 248,278.39 96.161220-6701 Interest 0.00 9,921.61 Total Interest 258,200.00 119,178.39 248,278.39 0.00 9,921.61 96.16 1220-6800 Principal Total Principal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1220-6900 Lease Payments 470,000.00 0.00 465,861.44 99.121220-6901 Principal Payment 0.00 4,138.56 Total Lease Payments 470,000.00 0.00 465,861.44 0.00 4,138.56 99.12 Total 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds 728,200.00 119,178.39 714,139.83 0.00 14,060.17 98.07 198Page: Page 371 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 199 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 City Manager1201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1201-4200 Contract Services Total City Manager 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 199Page: Page 372 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 200 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Interfund Transfers Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200Page: Page 373 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 201 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Fire Protection2202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2202-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Fire Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 201Page: Page 374 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 202 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4100 Salaries and Benefits 256,202.00 28,168.51 190,285.49 74.274202-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 65,916.51 27,449.00 2,922.84 20,224.56 73.684202-4180 Retirement 0.00 7,224.44 31,783.00 2,838.69 23,192.01 72.974202-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 8,590.99 3,780.00 413.62 2,821.74 74.654202-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 958.26 Total Public Works Administration 319,214.00 34,343.66 236,523.80 0.00 82,690.20 74.10 202Page: Page 375 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 203 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Annual Street Improvements8105 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8105-4200 Contract Services Total Annual Street Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203Page: Page 376 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 204 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Beach Drive Underground Dist8106 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8106-4200 Contract Services 1,293,193.00 0.00 108,250.00 9.608106-4201 Annual St Improv Cont Svcs 15,950.00 1,168,993.00 Total Beach Drive Underground Dist 1,293,193.00 0.00 108,250.00 15,950.00 1,168,993.00 9.60 204Page: Page 377 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 205 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Traff Signal/Ardmore & 16Th St8107 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8107-4200 Contract Services 450,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008107-4201 Slurry Seal Improv Cont Svcs 0.00 450,000.00 Total Traff Signal/Ardmore & 16Th St 450,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 450,000.00 0.00 205Page: Page 378 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 206 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Pay-By-App Parking Signage8108 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8108-4200 Contract Services Total Pay-By-App Parking Signage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 206Page: Page 379 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 207 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Utility Box Wrappings8109 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8109-4200 Contract Services 19,316.00 6,109.54 18,632.75 99.578109-4201 Contract Serv/Private 600.00 83.25 Total Utility Box Wrappings 19,316.00 6,109.54 18,632.75 600.00 83.25 99.57 207Page: Page 380 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 208 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Gateway and Wayfinding Signs Conceptual8111 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8111-4200 Contract Services 75,000.00 8,800.00 13,863.75 50.678111-4201 Contract Serv/Private 24,136.25 37,000.00 Total Gateway and Wayfinding Signs Conceptual 75,000.00 8,800.00 13,863.75 24,136.25 37,000.00 50.67 208Page: Page 381 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 209 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Annual City Sidewalk Improvements8112 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8112-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8112-4200 Contract Services Total Annual City Sidewalk Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 209Page: Page 382 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 210 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 St Improv/Concrete Rd Recons-Various8113 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8113-4200 Contract Services 199,622.00 0.00 0.00 0.008113-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 199,622.00 Total Contract Services 199,622.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 199,622.00 0.00 8113-5400 Equipment/Furniture 100,378.00 0.00 0.00 100.008113-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 100,377.50 0.50 Total Equipment/Furniture 100,378.00 0.00 0.00 100,377.50 0.50 100.00 Total St Improv/Concrete Rd Recons-Various 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 100,377.50 199,622.50 33.46 210Page: Page 383 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 211 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 20th St/Valley Dr to Power St.8115 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8115-4200 Contract Services 572,280.00 0.00 0.00 0.008115-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 572,280.00 Total 20th St/Valley Dr to Power St. 572,280.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 572,280.00 0.00 211Page: Page 384 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 212 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 PCH Traffic Improvements8160 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8160-4200 Contract Services Total PCH Traffic Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 212Page: Page 385 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 213 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 City Sidewalk Improvements8195 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8195-4200 Contract Services Total City Sidewalk Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 213Page: Page 386 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 214 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati8417 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8417-4200 Contract Services Total Storm Drain Improvements- Various Locati 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 214Page: Page 387 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 215 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Greenbelt Pedestrian Trail8502 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8502-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8502-4200 Contract Services 13,293.00 0.00 8,400.00 100.008502-4201 Contract Serv/Private 4,892.57 0.43 Total Greenbelt Pedestrian Trail 13,293.00 0.00 8,400.00 4,892.57 0.43 100.00 215Page: Page 388 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 216 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Greenbelt Root Barrier System8504 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8504-4200 Contract Services 380,000.00 121,104.12 121,104.12 31.878504-4201 Playground Equip Cont Svcs 0.00 258,895.88 Total Greenbelt Root Barrier System 380,000.00 121,104.12 121,104.12 0.00 258,895.88 31.87 216Page: Page 389 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 217 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Citywide Park Master Plan8538 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8538-4200 Contract Services Total Citywide Park Master Plan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 217Page: Page 390 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 218 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Temporary Beach Accessible Routes8549 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8549-4200 Contract Services Total Temporary Beach Accessible Routes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 218Page: Page 391 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 219 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Prospect Avenue Curb Ramps8601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8601-4200 Contract Services Total Prospect Avenue Curb Ramps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 219Page: Page 392 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 220 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 South Park Slope, Irrigation and Landsca8603 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8603-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8603-4200 Contract Services 42,627.00 0.00 42,626.63 100.008603-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 0.37 Total South Park Slope, Irrigation and Landsca 42,627.00 0.00 42,626.63 0.00 0.37 100.00 220Page: Page 393 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 221 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 City Wide ADA Improvements8604 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8604-4200 Contract Services 12,260.00 0.00 2,276.12 100.008604-4201 Contract Serv/Private 9,983.55 0.33 Total City Wide ADA Improvements 12,260.00 0.00 2,276.12 9,983.55 0.33 100.00 221Page: Page 394 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 222 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 City Facilities Condition and Needs Asse8605 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8605-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8605-4200 Contract Services Total City Facilities Condition and Needs Asse 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 222Page: Page 395 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 223 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Record Center Renovation8607 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8607-4200 Contract Services Total Record Center Renovation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 223Page: Page 396 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 224 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Pier Plaza Safety and Lighting Enhanceme8609 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8609-4200 Contract Services Total Pier Plaza Safety and Lighting Enhanceme 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 224Page: Page 397 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 225 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Fort Lots-O-Fun Wall and Gate Imprvement8610 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8610-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8610-4200 Contract Services 150,042.00 0.00 0.00 0.008610-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 150,042.00 Total Fort Lots-O-Fun Wall and Gate Imprvement 150,042.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150,042.00 0.00 225Page: Page 398 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 226 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 City Hall Replacement8611 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8611-4200 Contract Services 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008611-4201 Park Struct Lot C Cont Svcs 0.00 300,000.00 Total City Hall Replacement 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300,000.00 0.00 226Page: Page 399 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 227 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 New Corporate Yard Facility8615 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8615-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8615-4200 Contract Services 1,889,278.00 10,140.00 12,870.00 39.538615-4201 Contract Serv/Private 733,988.00 1,142,420.00 Total New Corporate Yard Facility 1,889,278.00 10,140.00 12,870.00 733,988.00 1,142,420.00 39.53 227Page: Page 400 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 228 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Bard Trailer Improvements8616 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8616-4200 Contract Services Total Bard Trailer Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 228Page: Page 401 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 229 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Civic Center Charging Stations8617 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8617-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8617-4200 Contract Services Total Civic Center Charging Stations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 229Page: Page 402 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 230 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Tsunami Siren8618 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8618-4200 Contract Services 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008618-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 25,000.00 Total Tsunami Siren 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 230Page: Page 403 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 231 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Kelly Courts Improvements8619 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8619-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8619-4200 Contract Services 774,026.00 178,588.92 296,360.67 56.558619-4201 Contract Serv/Private 141,324.62 336,340.71 Total Kelly Courts Improvements 774,026.00 178,588.92 296,360.67 141,324.62 336,340.71 56.55 231Page: Page 404 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 232 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 City Wide Roof Repair8620 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8620-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8620-4200 Contract Services Total City Wide Roof Repair 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 232Page: Page 405 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 233 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Comprehensive Downtown Lighting Design8621 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8621-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8621-4200 Contract Services 142,284.00 0.00 0.00 0.008621-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 142,284.00 Total Comprehensive Downtown Lighting Design 142,284.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 142,284.00 0.00 233Page: Page 406 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 234 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Pier Structural Inspection & Evaluation8623 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8623-4200 Contract Services 3,228,363.00 15,216.41 85,326.29 2.648623-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 3,143,036.71 Total Pier Structural Inspection & Evaluation 3,228,363.00 15,216.41 85,326.29 0.00 3,143,036.71 2.64 234Page: Page 407 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 235 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 City Wide ADA Improvements8625 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8625-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8625-4200 Contract Services 238,039.00 0.00 0.00 0.008625-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 238,039.00 Total City Wide ADA Improvements 238,039.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 238,039.00 0.00 235Page: Page 408 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 236 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Municipal Pier Structural Assess/Repair8629 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8629-4200 Contract Services Total Municipal Pier Structural Assess /Repair 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 236Page: Page 409 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 237 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Pier Renovation/Phase III8630 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8630-4200 Contract Services 350,000.00 0.00 226,862.08 74.508630-4201 Comm Center Natural Gas Line Replacement 33,874.99 89,262.93 Total Pier Renovation/Phase III 350,000.00 0.00 226,862.08 33,874.99 89,262.93 74.50 237Page: Page 410 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 238 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Re-Roofing Of City Buildings8633 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8633-4200 Contract Services 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.008633-4201 Base 3 Electrical Repairs 0.00 100,000.00 Total Re-Roofing Of City Buildings 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 238Page: Page 411 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 239 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Community Center Shed Demolition8635 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8635-4200 Contract Services 300,000.00 12,125.00 41,225.00 16.838635-4201 Comm Center Windows Cont Svcs 9,275.00 249,500.00 Total Community Center Shed Demolition 300,000.00 12,125.00 41,225.00 9,275.00 249,500.00 16.83 239Page: Page 412 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 240 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs8660 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8660-4200 Contract Services Total Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 240Page: Page 413 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 241 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 City Park Restroom Renovations8669 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8669-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8669-4200 Contract Services Total City Park Restroom Renovations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 241Page: Page 414 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 242 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Parking Lot D Improvements8682 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8682-4200 Contract Services Total Parking Lot D Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 242Page: Page 415 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 243 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Emergency Op Center Renovations8684 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8684-4200 Contract Services Total Emergency Op Center Renovations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 243Page: Page 416 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 244 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Clark Building Renovations8689 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8689-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8689-4200 Contract Services 214,607.00 0.00 153,939.57 94.218689-4201 Contract Serv/Private 48,236.40 12,431.03 Total Clark Building Renovations 214,607.00 0.00 153,939.57 48,236.40 12,431.03 94.21 244Page: Page 417 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 245 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Police Station Improvements8696 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8696-4200 Contract Services Total Police Station Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 245Page: Page 418 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 246 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements8699 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8699-4100 Salaries and Benefits Total Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8699-4200 Contract Services 750,439.00 41,192.17 315,431.71 63.138699-4201 Contract Serv/Private 158,334.80 276,672.49 Total Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements 750,439.00 41,192.17 315,431.71 158,334.80 276,672.49 63.13 246Page: Page 419 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 247 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Capital Improvement Fund301 Tree Well Grates8760 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8760-4200 Contract Services Total Tree Well Grates 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Capital Improvement Fund 11,939,261.00 427,619.82 1,683,692.49 1,280,973.68 8,974,594.83 24.83 247Page: Page 420 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 248 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Greenwich Village N Utility Undergrnd Im313 St Improv/Speed Humps-Various8114 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8114-4200 Contract Services 4,031,600.00 246,726.19 787,181.64 74.738114-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2,225,627.26 1,018,791.10 Total Greenwich Village N Utility Undergrnd Im 4,031,600.00 246,726.19 787,181.64 2,225,627.26 1,018,791.10 74.73 248Page: Page 421 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 249 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2609 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 27,097.00 0.00 27,097.00 100.001299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 27,097.00 0.00 27,097.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Total Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2 27,097.00 0.00 27,097.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 249Page: Page 422 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 250 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund610 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 3,550.00 0.00 3,550.00 100.001299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3,550.00 0.00 3,550.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Total Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund 3,550.00 0.00 3,550.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 250Page: Page 423 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 251 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund611 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 2,294.00 0.00 2,294.00 100.001299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,294.00 0.00 2,294.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund 2,294.00 0.00 2,294.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 251Page: Page 424 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 252 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund617 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 52,131.00 0.00 52,131.00 100.001299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out 0.00 0.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 52,131.00 0.00 52,131.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Total Myrtle Ave Assessment Fund 52,131.00 0.00 52,131.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 252Page: Page 425 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 253 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Loma Drive Assessment Fund618 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 90,040.00 0.00 90,040.00 100.001299-4399 Operating Trsfr Out 0.00 0.00 Total Loma Drive Assessment Fund 90,040.00 0.00 90,040.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 253Page: Page 426 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 254 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Greenwich Bond Reserve623 Finance Administration1202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1202-4200 Contract Services Total Finance Administration 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 254Page: Page 427 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 255 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Greenwich Bond Reserve623 Interfund Transfers Out1299 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Greenwich Bond Reserve 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 255Page: Page 428 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 256 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Insurance Fund705 City Attorney Litigation1133 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1133-4200 Contract Services 330,000.00 12,036.60 120,096.94 36.391133-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 209,903.06 Total City Attorney Litigation 330,000.00 12,036.60 120,096.94 0.00 209,903.06 36.39 256Page: Page 429 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 257 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Insurance Fund705 Liability Insurance1209 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1209-4100 Salaries and Benefits 55,017.00 1,657.14 28,175.86 51.211209-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 26,841.14 2,985.00 0.00 2,984.55 99.981209-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.45 3,562.00 141.95 2,213.90 62.151209-4180 Retirement 0.00 1,348.10 3,245.00 156.36 2,406.10 74.151209-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 838.90 871.00 24.31 481.51 55.281209-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 389.49 Total Salaries and Benefits 65,680.00 1,979.76 36,261.92 0.00 29,418.08 55.21 1209-4200 Contract Services 1,342,274.00 854.00 1,378,653.83 104.411209-4201 Contract Serv/Private 22,802.00 -59,181.83 Total Contract Services 1,342,274.00 854.00 1,378,653.83 22,802.00 -59,181.83 104.41 1209-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001209-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 5,000.00 900,000.00 11,137.72 294,924.70 32.771209-4324 Claims/Settlements 0.00 605,075.30 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 905,000.00 11,137.72 294,924.70 0.00 610,075.30 32.59 Total Liability Insurance 2,312,954.00 13,971.48 1,709,840.45 22,802.00 580,311.55 74.91 257Page: Page 430 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 258 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Insurance Fund705 Auto/Property/Bonds1210 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1210-4200 Contract Services 421,302.00 -44,521.14 175,101.00 41.561210-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 246,201.00 Total Contract Services 421,302.00 -44,521.14 175,101.00 0.00 246,201.00 41.56 1210-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001210-4324 Claims/Settlements 0.00 10,000.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 Total Auto/Property/Bonds 431,302.00 -44,521.14 175,101.00 0.00 256,201.00 40.60 258Page: Page 431 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 259 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Insurance Fund705 Unemployment1215 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1215-4100 Salaries and Benefits 0.00 0.00 8,788.00 0.001215-4186 Unemployment Claims 0.00 -8,788.00 Total Unemployment 0.00 0.00 8,788.00 0.00 -8,788.00 0.00 259Page: Page 432 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 260 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Insurance Fund705 Workers' Compensation1217 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1217-4100 Salaries and Benefits 55,017.00 1,657.14 28,175.92 51.211217-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 26,841.08 2,985.00 0.00 2,984.55 99.981217-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 0.45 4,175.00 196.88 2,708.32 64.871217-4180 Retirement 0.00 1,466.68 3,245.00 156.26 2,405.48 74.131217-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 839.52 871.00 24.30 481.40 55.271217-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 389.60 Total Salaries and Benefits 66,293.00 2,034.58 36,755.67 0.00 29,537.33 55.44 1217-4200 Contract Services 752,818.00 4,617.00 704,683.64 97.361217-4201 Contract Serv/Private 28,285.00 19,849.36 Total Contract Services 752,818.00 4,617.00 704,683.64 28,285.00 19,849.36 97.36 1217-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 1.43 0.001217-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 -1.43 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001217-4317 Conference/Training 0.00 5,000.00 700,000.00 34,836.03 460,142.98 88.571217-4324 Claims/Settlements 159,812.02 80,045.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 705,000.00 34,836.03 460,144.41 159,812.02 85,043.57 87.94 Total Workers' Compensation 1,524,111.00 41,487.61 1,201,583.72 188,097.02 134,430.26 91.18 Total Insurance Fund 4,598,367.00 22,974.55 3,215,410.11 210,899.02 1,172,057.87 74.51 260Page: Page 433 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 261 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 City Council1101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1101-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1101-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total City Council 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 261Page: Page 434 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 262 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 City Clerk1121 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1121-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1121-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total City Clerk 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 262Page: Page 435 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 263 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 City Manager1201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1201-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Materials/Supplies/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1201-4900 Depreciation 1,722.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 1,722.00 Total Depreciation 1,722.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,722.00 0.00 1201-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2,985.00 0.00 2,172.27 72.771201-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 812.73 18,922.00 0.00 0.00 0.001201-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 18,922.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 21,907.00 0.00 2,172.27 0.00 19,734.73 9.92 Total City Manager 23,629.00 0.00 2,172.27 0.00 21,456.73 9.19 263Page: Page 436 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 264 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Finance Administration1202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1202-4900 Depreciation 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001202-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 1,000.00 Total Depreciation 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 1202-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Finance Administration 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 264Page: Page 437 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 265 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Human Resources1203 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1203-4900 Depreciation 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 1,500.00 Total Depreciation 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 1203-5400 Equipment/Furniture 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.001203-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 1,500.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 Total Human Resources 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 265Page: Page 438 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 266 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Finance Cashier1204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1204-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1204-4900 Depreciation 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 100.00 Total Depreciation 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 1204-5400 Equipment/Furniture 318.00 0.00 0.00 0.001204-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 318.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 318.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 318.00 0.00 Total Finance Cashier 418.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 418.00 0.00 266Page: Page 439 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 267 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Information Technology1206 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1206-4200 Contract Services 1,396,633.00 80,785.55 838,069.42 91.031206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 433,222.46 125,341.12 Total Contract Services 1,396,633.00 80,785.55 838,069.42 433,222.46 125,341.12 91.03 1206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 39,887.00 3,356.49 30,035.84 75.301206-4304 Telephone 0.00 9,851.16 10,000.00 312.96 8,990.60 89.911206-4305 Office Oper Supplies 0.00 1,009.40 566.00 47.00 423.00 74.731206-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 143.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 50,453.00 3,716.45 39,449.44 0.00 11,003.56 78.19 1206-4900 Depreciation 70,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001206-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 70,000.00 13,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001206-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 13,000.00 Total Depreciation 83,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83,000.00 0.00 1206-5400 Equipment/Furniture 31,467.00 6,491.84 6,491.84 20.631206-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 24,975.16 48,826.00 0.00 7,662.34 15.691206-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 41,163.66 238,612.00 3,347.38 3,347.38 1.401206-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 235,264.62 Total Equipment/Furniture 318,905.00 9,839.22 17,501.56 0.00 301,403.44 5.49 Total Information Technology 1,848,991.00 94,341.22 895,020.42 433,222.46 520,748.12 71.84 267Page: Page 440 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 268 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 General Appropriations1208 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 1208-4200 Contract Services 10,000.00 602.22 1,806.66 24.091208-4201 Contract Serv/Private 602.22 7,591.12 Total Contract Services 10,000.00 602.22 1,806.66 602.22 7,591.12 24.09 1208-4900 Depreciation 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.001208-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 6,000.00 Total Depreciation 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,000.00 0.00 1208-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total General Appropriations 16,000.00 602.22 1,806.66 602.22 13,591.12 15.06 268Page: Page 441 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 269 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Police2101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2101-4200 Contract Services 190,687.00 226.90 141,152.05 75.492101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2,791.97 46,742.98 Total Contract Services 190,687.00 226.90 141,152.05 2,791.97 46,742.98 75.49 2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 93,170.00 2,884.44 28,722.42 30.832101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 64,447.58 77,175.00 7,571.60 61,682.64 83.182101-4311 Auto Maintenance 2,514.06 12,978.30 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 170,345.00 10,456.04 90,405.06 2,514.06 77,425.88 54.55 2101-4900 Depreciation 65,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 65,000.00 180,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.002101-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 180,000.00 Total Depreciation 245,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 245,000.00 0.00 2101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 27,215.02 1,190.79 18,202.04 66.882101-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 9,012.98 522,225.00 0.00 246,538.33 78.542101-5403 Vehicles 163,634.94 112,051.73 Total Equipment/Furniture 549,440.02 1,190.79 264,740.37 163,634.94 121,064.71 77.97 2101-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Police 1,155,472.02 11,873.73 496,297.48 168,940.97 490,233.57 57.57 269Page: Page 442 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 270 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Fire2201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other Total Fire 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 270Page: Page 443 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 271 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Lighting/Landscaping/Medians2601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 2601-4200 Contract Services 10,000.00 0.00 2,197.60 21.982601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 7,802.40 Total Contract Services 10,000.00 0.00 2,197.60 0.00 7,802.40 21.98 2601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,500.00 0.00 59.65 3.982601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 1,440.35 1,000.00 91.75 314.26 31.432601-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 685.74 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 2,500.00 91.75 373.91 0.00 2,126.09 14.96 2601-4900 Depreciation 1,650.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 1,650.00 8,100.00 0.00 0.00 0.002601-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 8,100.00 Total Depreciation 9,750.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,750.00 0.00 2601-5400 Equipment/Furniture 361,826.00 0.00 69,481.74 98.472601-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 286,825.04 5,519.22 Total Equipment/Furniture 361,826.00 0.00 69,481.74 286,825.04 5,519.22 98.47 Total Lighting/Landscaping/Medians 384,076.00 91.75 72,053.25 286,825.04 25,197.71 93.44 271Page: Page 444 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 272 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Sewers/Storm Drains3102 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3102-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3102-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 1,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.003102-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 4,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 619.16 30.963102-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,380.84 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 7,000.00 0.00 619.16 0.00 6,380.84 8.85 3102-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3102-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Sewers/Storm Drains 7,000.00 0.00 619.16 0.00 6,380.84 8.85 272Page: Page 445 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 273 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Street Maint/Traffic Safety3104 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3104-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 8,000.00 361.13 5,404.06 67.553104-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 2,595.94 8,000.00 565.30 2,238.89 53.433104-4311 Auto Maintenance 2,035.28 3,725.83 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 16,000.00 926.43 7,642.95 2,035.28 6,321.77 60.49 3104-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3104-5400 Equipment/Furniture 18,781.00 0.00 18,780.80 100.003104-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 0.20 Total Equipment/Furniture 18,781.00 0.00 18,780.80 0.00 0.20 100.00 Total Street Maint/Traffic Safety 34,781.00 926.43 26,423.75 2,035.28 6,321.97 81.82 273Page: Page 446 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 274 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Storm Drains3109 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3109-4200 Contract Services 10,000.00 0.00 4,603.43 63.823109-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,778.72 3,617.85 Total Contract Services 10,000.00 0.00 4,603.43 1,778.72 3,617.85 63.82 3109-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.003109-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 600.00 1,500.00 2,300.46 2,300.46 153.363109-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 -800.46 2,000.00 0.00 82.49 4.123109-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,917.51 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4,100.00 2,300.46 2,382.95 0.00 1,717.05 58.12 3109-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3109-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Storm Drains 14,100.00 2,300.46 6,986.38 1,778.72 5,334.90 62.16 274Page: Page 447 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 275 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Downtown Enhancement3301 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3301-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Downtown Enhancement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 275Page: Page 448 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 276 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Community Services3302 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 3302-4200 Contract Services 32,806.00 0.00 0.00 0.003302-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 32,806.00 Total Contract Services 32,806.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32,806.00 0.00 3302-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 23,400.00 1,469.94 17,007.82 72.683302-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 6,392.18 26,920.00 638.75 11,096.24 41.223302-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 15,823.76 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 50,320.00 2,108.69 28,104.06 0.00 22,215.94 55.85 3302-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3302-5400 Equipment/Furniture 1,514.00 0.00 0.00 100.003302-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 1,514.01 -0.01 72,567.00 0.00 17,924.12 53.723302-5403 Vehicles 21,055.94 33,586.94 Total Equipment/Furniture 74,081.00 0.00 17,924.12 22,569.95 33,586.93 54.66 Total Community Services 157,207.00 2,108.69 46,028.18 22,569.95 88,608.87 43.64 276Page: Page 449 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 277 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Community Dev/Planning4101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4101-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4101-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4101-5400 Equipment/Furniture 17,214.00 12,028.22 13,034.86 75.724101-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 4,179.14 1,920.00 0.00 0.00 0.004101-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 1,920.00 Total Community Dev/Planning 19,134.00 12,028.22 13,034.86 0.00 6,099.14 68.12 277Page: Page 450 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 278 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Community Dev/Building4201 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4201-4200 Contract Services 27,000.00 0.00 15,986.25 74.094201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 4,017.62 6,996.13 Total Contract Services 27,000.00 0.00 15,986.25 4,017.62 6,996.13 74.09 4201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 1,423.00 62.03 220.64 15.514201-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 1,202.36 1,801.00 0.00 363.19 20.174201-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,437.81 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 3,224.00 62.03 583.83 0.00 2,640.17 18.11 4201-4900 Depreciation 2,098.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 2,098.00 7,162.00 0.00 0.00 0.004201-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 7,162.00 Total Depreciation 9,260.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,260.00 0.00 4201-5400 Equipment/Furniture 3,100.00 0.00 190.32 206.814201-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 6,220.92 -3,311.24 Total Equipment/Furniture 3,100.00 0.00 190.32 6,220.92 -3,311.24 206.81 Total Community Dev/Building 42,584.00 62.03 16,760.40 10,238.54 15,585.06 63.40 278Page: Page 451 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 279 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Public Works Administration4202 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4202-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 4,000.00 342.55 2,264.66 56.624202-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 1,735.34 2,000.00 0.00 300.61 15.034202-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,699.39 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 6,000.00 342.55 2,565.27 0.00 3,434.73 42.75 4202-4900 Depreciation 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 11,000.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 5,500.00 Total Depreciation 16,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,500.00 0.00 4202-5400 Equipment/Furniture 3,823.00 0.00 0.00 0.004202-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 3,823.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 3,823.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,823.00 0.00 Total Public Works Administration 26,323.00 342.55 2,565.27 0.00 23,757.73 9.75 279Page: Page 452 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 280 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Building Maintenance4204 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4204-4200 Contract Services 312,903.00 10,168.03 147,234.03 54.654204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 23,771.46 141,897.51 Total Contract Services 312,903.00 10,168.03 147,234.03 23,771.46 141,897.51 54.65 4204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 6,500.00 475.89 4,546.75 69.954204-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 1,953.25 2,500.00 0.00 1,277.27 51.094204-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,222.73 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 9,000.00 475.89 5,824.02 0.00 3,175.98 64.71 4204-4900 Depreciation 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 5,000.00 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 9,000.00 Total Depreciation 14,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,000.00 0.00 4204-5400 Equipment/Furniture 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.004204-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 15,000.00 59,000.00 0.00 3,999.80 6.784204-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 0.00 55,000.20 Total Equipment/Furniture 74,000.00 0.00 3,999.80 0.00 70,000.20 5.41 4204-5600 Buildings/Improvements Total Buildings/Improvements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Building Maintenance 409,903.00 10,643.92 157,057.85 23,771.46 229,073.69 44.12 280Page: Page 453 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 281 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Equipment Service4206 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4206-4100 Salaries and Benefits 176,775.00 15,025.00 133,569.23 75.564206-4102 Regular Salaries 0.00 43,205.77 3,125.00 0.00 124.74 3.994206-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 3,000.26 1,844.00 0.00 1,844.12 100.014206-4111 Accrual Cash In 0.00 -0.12 111,774.00 9,631.66 87,823.08 78.574206-4180 Retirement 0.00 23,950.92 30.00 2.50 21.50 71.674206-4187 Uniform Allowance 0.00 8.50 38,964.00 3,500.61 28,762.81 73.824206-4188 Employee Benefits 0.00 10,201.19 2,638.00 223.38 2,009.92 76.194206-4189 Medicare Benefits 0.00 628.08 Total Salaries and Benefits 335,150.00 28,383.15 254,155.40 0.00 80,994.60 75.83 4206-4200 Contract Services 73,010.00 500.00 49,814.66 68.644206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 297.50 22,897.84 Total Contract Services 73,010.00 500.00 49,814.66 297.50 22,897.84 68.64 4206-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 20,000.00 872.88 9,229.91 46.154206-4309 Maintenance Materials 0.00 10,770.09 2,500.00 355.72 2,096.63 83.874206-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 403.37 1,500.00 0.00 534.24 35.624206-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 965.76 96,641.00 8,053.00 72,477.00 75.004206-4396 Insurance User Charges 0.00 24,164.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 120,641.00 9,281.60 84,337.78 0.00 36,303.22 69.91 4206-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4206-5400 Equipment/Furniture 41,500.00 0.00 25,562.45 69.764206-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 3,389.55 12,548.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 41,500.00 0.00 25,562.45 3,389.55 12,548.00 69.76 Total Equipment Service 570,301.00 38,164.75 413,870.29 3,687.05 152,743.66 73.22 281Page: Page 454 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 282 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Community Resources4601 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 4601-4200 Contract Services Total Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4601-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 600.00 24.03 401.10 66.854601-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 198.90 300.00 0.00 87.59 29.204601-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 212.41 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 900.00 24.03 488.69 0.00 411.31 54.30 4601-4900 Depreciation 1,560.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4901 Depreciation/Mach/Equipment 0.00 1,560.00 7,272.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-4902 Depreciation/Vehicles 0.00 7,272.00 Total Depreciation 8,832.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,832.00 0.00 4601-5400 Equipment/Furniture 2,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.004601-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 0.00 2,550.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 2,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,550.00 0.00 Total Community Resources 12,282.00 24.03 488.69 0.00 11,793.31 3.98 282Page: Page 455 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 283 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Parks6101 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 6101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other 5,000.00 306.86 3,071.14 61.426101-4310 Motor Fuels And Lubes 0.00 1,928.86 3,000.00 220.37 1,267.28 42.246101-4311 Auto Maintenance 0.00 1,732.72 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 8,000.00 527.23 4,338.42 0.00 3,661.58 54.23 6101-4900 Depreciation Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6101-5400 Equipment/Furniture Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Parks 8,000.00 527.23 4,338.42 0.00 3,661.58 54.23 283Page: Page 456 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 284 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 St Improv/Concrete Rd Recons-Various8113 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8113-4200 Contract Services 14,622.00 0.00 0.00 0.008113-4201 Contract Serv/Private 0.00 14,622.00 Total Contract Services 14,622.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,622.00 0.00 8113-5400 Equipment/Furniture 100,378.00 0.00 0.00 100.008113-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 100,377.50 0.50 Total Equipment/Furniture 100,378.00 0.00 0.00 100,377.50 0.50 100.00 Total St Improv/Concrete Rd Recons-Various 115,000.00 0.00 0.00 100,377.50 14,622.50 87.28 284Page: Page 457 of 1339 05/18/2026 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 285 10:26AM Page:expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report 3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026 Periods: 9 through 9 Equipment Replacement Fund715 Community Services Building Improvements8685 Prct UsedBalance Year-to-date Encumbrances Year-to-date ExpendituresExpenditures Adjusted AppropriationAccount Number 8685-5400 Equipment/Furniture 49,481.98 0.00 0.00 0.008685-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 0.00 49,481.98 Total Community Services Building Improvements 49,481.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,481.98 0.00 Total Equipment Replacement Fund 4,898,683.00 174,037.23 2,155,523.33 1,054,049.19 1,689,110.48 65.52 Grand Total 102,130,536.00 6,344,970.94 57,189,957.11 67.10 11,339,915.76 33,600,663.13 285Page: Page 458 of 1339 Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Project Title/Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Prct Used Bus Stop Improvements (102) 145-8102-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - 324,251.50 (324,251.50) 0.00% 146-8102-4201 Contract Serv/Private 372,000.00 - - - 372,000.00 0.00% 372,000.00 - - 324,251.50 47,748.50 87.16% Annual Street Improvements (105) 115-8105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 87,965.00 - 86,587.10 40,332.66 (38,954.76) 144.28% 122-8105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 39,426.00 - 34,825.90 4,600.00 0.10 100.00% 146-8105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 31,658.00 - 31,658.45 - (0.45) 100.00% 147-8105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 95,330.00 - 95,330.11 - (0.11) 100.00% 148-8105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 28,705.00 - 28,705.25 - (0.25) 100.00% 150-8105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 50,000.00 - - - 50,000.00 0.00% 333,084.00 - 277,106.81 44,932.66 11,044.53 96.68% Annual Street Improvements (106) 115-8106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 600,000.00 - - - 600,000.00 0.00% 116-8106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 15,257.00 - - - 15,257.00 0.00% 122-8106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 600,000.00 - 35,246.00 35,246.00 529,508.00 11.75% 146-8106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 206,807.00 - - - 206,807.00 0.00% 147-8106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 540,000.00 - - - 540,000.00 0.00% 148-8106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 370,000.00 - - - 370,000.00 0.00% 301-8106-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,293,193.00 - 108,250.00 15,950.00 1,168,993.00 9.60% 3,625,257.00 - 143,496.00 51,196.00 3,430,565.00 5.37% Slurry Seal Improvements (107) 301-8107-4201 Contract Serv/Private 450,000.00 - - - 450,000.00 0.00% 450,000.00 - - - 450,000.00 0.00% Utility Box Wrappings (109) 301-8109-4201 Contract Serv/Private 19,316.00 6,109.54 18,632.75 600.00 83.25 99.57% 19,316.00 6,109.54 18,632.75 600.00 83.25 99.57% Gateway and Wayfinding Signs Assessment (111) 001-8111-4201 Contract Serv/Private 500,000.00 - - - 500,000.00 0.00% 301-8111-4201 Contract Serv/Private 75,000.00 8,800.00 13,863.75 24,136.25 37,000.00 50.67% 575,000.00 8,800.00 13,863.75 24,136.25 537,000.00 50.67% Slurry & Crack Sealing-Various (112) 001-8112-4201 Contract Serv/Private 50,000.00 - - - 50,000.00 0.00% 50,000.00 - - - 50,000.00 0.00% City Wide Multi-Space Meters Deployment (113) 301-8113-4201 Contract Serv/Private 199,622.00 - - - 199,622.00 0.00% 301-8113-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 100,378.00 - - 100,377.50 0.50 100.00% 715-8113-4201 Contract Serv/Private 14,622.00 - - - 14,622.00 0.00% 715-8113-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 100,378.00 - - 100,377.50 0.50 100.00% 415,000.00 - - 200,755.00 214,245.00 48.37% Greenwich Village North Undergrounding (114) 313-8114-4201 Contract Serv/Private 4,031,600.00 246,726.19 787,181.64 2,225,627.26 1,018,791.10 74.73% 4,031,600.00 246,726.19 787,181.64 2,225,627.26 1,018,791.10 74.73% Annual City Sidewalk Improvements (115) 115-8115-4201 Contract Serv/Private 9,931.00 - - - 9,931.00 0.00% 146-8115-4201 Contract Serv/Private 25,000.00 - - - 25,000.00 0.00% 301-8115-4201 Contract Serv/Private 572,280.00 - - - 572,280.00 0.00% 607,211.00 - - - 607,211.00 0.00% PCH Mobility Improvement Project (143) 115-8143-4102 Contract Serv/Private 12,375.00 - - 12,375.00 - 100.00% CIP Report by Project 3/31/2026 Page 459 of 1339 Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Project Title/Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Prct Used CIP Report by Project 3/31/2026 PCH Mobility Improvement Project (143) 147-8143-4102 Contract Serv/Private 30,000.00 - - - 30,000.00 0.00% 42,375.00 - - 12,375.00 30,000.00 29.20% Hermosa Ave Green Street (164) 149-8164-4201 Contract Serv/Private 123,262.00 - 128,868.00 - (5,606.00) 104.55% 161-8164-4201 Contract Serv/Private 245,024.00 - 239,417.56 - 5,606.44 97.71% 368,286.00 - 368,285.56 - 0.44 100.00% Annual Street Improvements (191) 148-8191-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - 22,275.78 (22,275.78) 0.00% 22,275.78 (22,275.78) 0.00% Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements (193) 146-8193-4201 Contract Serv/Private 110,000.00 - - - 110,000.00 0.00% 110,000.00 - - - 110,000.00 0.00% Storm Drain Improv - Various Locations (417) 161-8417-4201 Contract Serv/Private 827,421.00 - 104,125.00 - 723,296.00 12.58% 827,421.00 - 104,125.00 - 723,296.00 12.58% Annual Sewer Improvements, Phase II (421) 160-8421-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,765,884.00 - 948,526.43 328,487.51 488,870.06 72.32% 1,765,884.00 - 948,526.43 328,487.51 488,870.06 72.32% Annual Sewer Improvements (423) 160-8423-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,011,003.00 - - - 1,011,003.00 0.00% 160-8423-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 - - 35,148.79 - (35,148.79) 0.00% 1,011,003.00 - 35,148.79 - 975,854.21 3.48% Stormwater Dry Wells (438) 149-8438-4201 Contract Serv/Private 175,000.00 - - - 175,000.00 0.00% 175,000.00 - - - 175,000.00 0.00% Greenbelt Pedestrian Trail (502) 122-8502-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - - 3,000.00 (3,000.00) 0.00% 301-8502-4201 Contract Serv/Private 13,293.00 - 8,400.00 4,892.57 0.43 100.00% 13,293.00 - 8,400.00 7,892.57 (2,999.57) 122.57% Playground Equipment Replacement (504) 125-8504-4201 Contract Serv/Private 70,000.00 58,677.66 58,677.66 - 11,322.34 83.83% 301-8504-4201 Contract Serv/Private 380,000.00 121,104.12 121,104.12 - 258,895.88 31.87% 450,000.00 179,781.78 179,781.78 - 270,218.22 39.95% South Park Slope, Irrigation, and Landscape Improvements (603) 125-8603-4201 Contract Serv/Private 9,596.00 - 3,248.00 6,348.50 (0.50) 100.01% 150-8603-4201 Contract Serv/Private 105,734.00 - 9,492.45 - 96,241.55 8.98% 301-8603-4201 Contract Serv/Private 42,627.00 - 42,626.63 - 0.37 100.00% 157,957.00 - 55,367.08 6,348.50 96,241.42 39.07% City Wide ADA Improvements (604) 301-8604-4201 Contract Serv/Private 12,260.00 - 2,276.12 9,983.55 0.33 100.00% 12,260.00 - 2,276.12 9,983.55 0.33 100.00% Fort Lots-O-Fun Wall and Gate Improvements (610) 301-8610-4201 Contract Serv/Private 150,042.00 - - - 150,042.00 0.00% 150,042.00 - - - 150,042.00 0.00% Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements, Phase II (611) 301-8611-4201 Contract Serv/Private 300,000.00 - - - 300,000.00 0.00% 300,000.00 - - - 300,000.00 0.00% New Corporate Yard Facilities (615) 301-8615-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,889,278.00 10,140.00 12,870.00 733,988.00 1,142,420.00 39.53% 1,889,278.00 10,140.00 12,870.00 733,988.00 1,142,420.00 39.53%Page 460 of 1339 Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Project Title/Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Prct Used CIP Report by Project 3/31/2026 Tsunami Siren (618) 150-8618-4201 Contract Serv/Private 75,000.00 - - - 75,000.00 0.00% 301-8618-4201 Contract Serv/Private 25,000.00 - - - 25,000.00 0.00% 100,000.00 - - - 100,000.00 0.00% Kelly Courts Improvements (619) 122-8619-4201 Contract Serv/Private 250,000.00 - 237,500.00 12,500.00 - 100.00% 125-8619-4201 Contract Serv/Private 310,000.00 - 294,500.01 15,499.99 - 100.00% 301-8619-4201 Contract Serv/Private 774,026.00 178,588.92 296,360.67 141,324.62 336,340.71 56.55% 1,334,026.00 178,588.92 828,360.68 169,324.61 336,340.71 74.79% Comprehensive Downtown Lighting Design (621) 301-8621-4201 Contract Serv/Private 142,284.00 - - - 142,284.00 0.00% 142,284.00 - - - 142,284.00 0.00% Pier Structural Inspection and Evaluation (623) 122-8623-4201 Contract Serv/Private 216,767.00 - 28,485.00 58,779.30 129,502.70 40.26% 191-8623-4201 Contract Serv/Private 272,007.00 - 89,985.65 287,926.35 (105,905.00) 138.93% 301-8623-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3,228,363.00 15,216.41 85,326.29 - 3,143,036.71 2.64% 3,717,137.00 15,216.41 203,796.94 346,705.65 3,166,634.41 14.81% City Wide ADA Improvements (625) 301-8625-4201 Contract Serv/Private 238,039.00 - - - 238,039.00 0.00% 238,039.00 - - - 238,039.00 0.00% Community Development Block Grant Improvements (626) 140-8626-4201 Contract Serv/Private 184,000.00 - - - 184,000.00 0.00% 184,000.00 - - - 184,000.00 0.00% Community Center Gas Repairs (630) 301-8630-4201 Contract Serv/Private 350,000.00 - 226,862.08 33,874.99 89,262.93 74.50% 350,000.00 - 226,862.08 33,874.99 89,262.93 74.50% Base 3 Electrical Improvements (633) 301-8633-4201 Contract Serv/Private 100,000.00 - - - 100,000.00 0.00% 100,000.00 - - - 100,000.00 0.00% Community Center Windows Replacement (635) 301-8635-4201 Contract Serv/Private 300,000.00 12,125.00 41,225.00 9,275.00 249,500.00 16.83% 300,000.00 12,125.00 41,225.00 9,275.00 249,500.00 0.00% Real Time Crime Center (685) 150-8685-4201 Contract Serv/Private 811,061.00 - 160,036.85 573,439.99 77,584.16 90.43% 715-8685-4201 Contract Serv/Private 49,481.98 - - - 49,481.98 0.00% 860,542.98 - 160,036.85 573,439.99 127,066.14 85.23% Clark Building Renovations (689) 122-8689-4201 Contract Serv/Private - - 11,241.60 - (11,241.60) 0.00% 301-8689-4201 Contract Serv/Private 214,607.00 - 153,939.57 48,236.40 12,431.03 94.21% 214,607.00 - 165,181.17 48,236.40 1,189.43 99.45% Parking Lot A Improvements (695) 190-8695-4201 Contract Serv/Private 16,166.00 - 16,165.81 0.02 0.17 100.00% 16,166.00 - 16,165.81 0.02 0.17 100.00% Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements (699) 122-8699-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,026,916.00 12,969.40 656,678.00 34,562.00 335,676.00 67.31% 149-8699-4201 Contract Serv/Private 69,370.00 - - 69,370.00 - 100.00% 161-8699-4201 Contract Serv/Private 124,800.00 118,560.00 118,560.00 6,240.00 - 100.00% 190-8699-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,109,288.00 190,837.62 282,686.81 826,601.19 - 100.00% 301-8699-4201 Contract Serv/Private 750,439.00 41,192.17 315,431.71 158,334.80 276,672.49 63.13% 3,080,813.00 363,559.19 1,373,356.52 1,095,107.99 612,348.49 80.12% Grand Total 28,388,881.98 1,021,047.03 5,970,046.76 6,268,814.23 16,150,020.99 43.11%Page 461 of 1339 Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Project Title/Account Number Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Prct Used CIP Report by Project 3/31/2026 001 General Fund 115 State Gas Tax Fund 116 TDA 3 Fund 122 Tyco Fund 125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 140 CDBG Fund 145 Proposition A Fund 146 Proposition C Fund 147 Measure R Fund 148 Measure M Fund 149 Measure W Fund 150 Grant Fund 160 Sewer Fund 161 Storm Drain 190 RTI Undersea Cable 191 RTI Undersea Cable Tidelands 301 Capital Improvement Fund 313 Greenwich Village N Utility Undergrnd Im 715 Equipment Replacement Fund Legend of Fund Numbers Page 462 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-AS-056 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CITY TREASURER’S REPORT (City Treasurer Dave Pedersen) Recommended Action: The City Treasurer recommends City Council receive and file the April 2026 City Treasurer’s Report. Executive Summary: Investments in the reports meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach’s adopted investment policy. Attached are reports of all inactive Public Deposits for the month of April 2026. This is the most current investment information available. Attachments: April 2026 City Treasurer’s Report Respectfully Submitted by: Dave Pedersen, City Treasurer Concur: Anna Bailey, Accountant Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Concur: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 463 of 1339 INSTITUTIONS RATE YIELD DATE OF DATE OF ORIGINAL MARKET COST/MARKET FACE/PAR OF TO INVESTMENT TYPE/INSTITUTION CUSIP # BOOK VALUE INVESTMENT MATURITY COST VALUE DIFFERENCE VALUE INTEREST MATURITY POOLED INVESTMENTS LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund)41,828,159.79$ 41,828,159.79$ $41,827,357.99 1 ($801.80) 41,828,159.79$ 3.980% LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund - Greenwich Village Underground)3,860,188.19$ 3,860,188.19$ $3,860,114.19 1 ($74.00) 3,860,188.19$ 3.980% LACPIF (Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Funds)2,235,749.21$ 2,235,749.21$ $2,187,833.55 2 ($47,915.66) 2,235,749.21$ 3.060%3 Pooled Investments % of Total Investment 78.782% 47,924,097.19$ 47,924,097.19$ $47,875,305.73 ($48,791.46) $47,924,097.19 RESTRICTED Section 115 Pension Trust 1,021,575.00$ 1,021,575.00$ 1,248,294.00$ 226,719.00$ 1,021,575.00$ Restricted Investements % of Total Investments 1.679% 1,021,575.00$ 1,021,575.00$ 1,248,294.00$ 226,719.00$ 1,021,575.00$ U.S. GOV'T AGENCY BONDS/NOTES US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CCF6 $499,968.76 6/9/2021 5/31/2026 $498,145.00 $498,690.00 $545.00 $500,000.00 0.750% 0.826% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CCP4 $249,969.78 8/11/2021 7/31/2026 $248,115.46 $248,105.00 ($10.46) $250,000.00 0.625% 0.780% US Treasury Note/Bond 912828Z78 $499,808.19 1/26/2022 1/31/2027 $498,692.19 $491,785.00 ($6,907.19) $500,000.00 1.500% 1.555% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CAL5 $475,462.94 10/31/2022 9/30/2027 $415,109.37 $476,210.00 $61,100.63 $500,000.00 0.375% 4.237% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CEB3 $469,692.79 2/29/2024 2/28/2029 $445,812.50 $472,910.00 $27,097.50 $500,000.00 1.875% 4.307% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CFL0 $498,981.62 10/22/2024 9/30/2029 $498,527.34 $498,850.00 $322.66 $500,000.00 3.875% 3.941% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CFT3 $497,794.55 10/31/2024 10/31/2029 $496,828.13 $500,780.00 $3,951.87 $500,000.00 4.000% 4.142% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CMD0 $250,301.83 1/29/2025 12/31/2029 $250,406.25 $253,515.00 $3,108.75 $250,000.00 4.375% 4.337% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CMU2 $502,130.24 4/21/2025 3/31/2030 $502,687.50 $500,470.00 ($2,217.50) $500,000.00 4.000% 3.879% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CHF1 $247,683.89 6/18/2025 5/31/2030 $247,193.36 $247,812.50 $619.14 $250,000.00 3.750% 4.002% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CHZ7 $521,731.60 10/22/2025 9/30/2030 $524,289.00 $512,480.00 ($11,809.00) $500,000.00 4.625% 3.544% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CJX0 $506,426.10 2/12/2026 1/31/2031 $506,711.00 $499,455.00 ($7,256.00) $500,000.00 4.000% 3.701% US Treasury Note/Bond 91282CKC4 $506,599.57 3/26/2026 2/28/2031 $506,730.47 $504,805.00 ($1,925.47) $500,000.00 4.250% 3.946% U.S. Gov't Agency Bonds/Notes 9.414% $5,726,551.86 $5,639,247.57 $5,705,867.50 $68,545.40 $5,750,000.00 NEGOTIABLE CDS Medallion Bank Utah 58404DLL3 $249,000.00 08/30/2021 08/31/2026 $249,000.00 $246,443.45 ($2,556.55) $249,000.00 0.850% 0.850% Synchrony Bank 87165FE42 $249,000.00 11/12/2021 11/12/2026 $249,000.00 $245,263.84 ($3,736.16) $249,000.00 1.100% 1.100% Toyota Financial Savings 89235MMB4 $249,000.00 11/12/2021 11/12/2026 $249,000.00 $245,263.84 ($3,736.16) $249,000.00 1.100% 1.100% Capital One BK USA Natl Ass 14042TGL52 $246,000.00 6/8/2022 6/2/2027 $246,000.00 $244,085.46 ($1,914.54) $246,000.00 3.199% 3.199% Capital One Natl Assn MCLEA 14042RRS21 $246,000.00 6/8/2022 6/2/2027 $246,000.00 $244,085.46 ($1,914.54) $246,000.00 3.199% 3.199% Third FS & LA Cleveland 88413QDN5 $245,000.00 8/23/2022 8/19/2027 $245,000.00 $243,038.19 ($1,961.81) $245,000.00 3.299% 3.299% Discover Bank/ Capital One Natl Assn 254673Q90 $245,000.00 8/23/2022 8/23/2027 $245,000.00 $243,335.96 ($1,664.04) $245,000.00 3.400% 3.400% First National Bank 32114VCF2 $249,000.00 2/10/2023 2/10/2028 $249,000.00 $247,853.08 ($1,146.92) $249,000.00 3.700% 3.700% First Business Bank 31938QW42 $245,000.00 2/15/2023 2/15/2028 $245,000.00 $244,072.70 ($927.30) $245,000.00 3.750% 3.750% Customers Bank 23204HPB8 $244,000.00 6/14/2023 6/14/2028 $244,000.00 $246,648.45 $2,648.45 $244,000.00 4.450% 4.450% Morgan Stanley Private Bank 61690U7S3 $244,000.00 6/14/2023 6/14/2028 $244,000.00 $249,857.85 $5,857.85 $244,000.00 4.500% 4.500% Park State Bank 70086VAY7 $249,000.00 8/9/2023 8/17/2028 $249,000.00 $254,597.20 $5,597.20 $249,000.00 4.400% 4.400% United Fidelity Bank 910286GUI $249,000.00 8/9/2023 8/17/2028 $249,000.00 $251,781.93 $2,781.93 $249,000.00 4.500% 4.500% Northpoint Bank 666613MK7 $248,000.00 10/20/2023 10/20/2028 $248,000.00 $253,000.28 $5,000.28 $248,000.00 4.850% 4.850% Southern First Bank 7954504W2 $244,000.00 10/17/2023 10/17/2028 $244,000.00 $249,297.56 $5,297.56 $244,000.00 4.850% 4.850% UBS BK USA 90355GHQ2 $248,000.00 11/9/2023 11/8/2028 $248,000.00 $254,280.33 $6,280.33 $248,000.00 5.000% 5.000% First State Bank 3365IMAL8 $248,000.00 11/16/2023 11/16/2028 $248,000.00 $253,342.81 $5,342.81 $248,000.00 4.900% 4.900% Morgan Stanley 61768E5C3 $244,000.00 6/12/2024 6/12/2029 $244,000.00 $248,433.16 $4,433.16 $244,000.00 4.700% 4.700% BNY Mellon 05584CPN0 $244,000.00 6/12/2024 6/12/2029 $244,000.00 $246,908.85 $2,908.85 $244,000.00 4.450% 4.450% State Bk India 856288CM5 $245,000.00 8/26/2025 8/21/2030 $245,000.00 $243,862.86 ($1,137.14) $245,000.00 4.000% 4.000% Goldman Sachs 38150V6U8 $245,000.00 9/23/2025 9/23/2030 $245,000.00 $239,819.94 ($5,180.06) $245,000.00 3.600% 3.600% Sallie Mae Bank 795451EE90 $245,000.00 12/10/2025 12/10/2030 $245,000.00 $243,400.08 ($1,599.92) $245,000.00 3.900% 3.900% Versabank USA 92512KBF93 $245,000.00 12/17/2025 12/17/2030 $245,000.00 $242,366.05 ($2,633.95) $245,000.00 3.800% 3.800% BMW Bk North 05612LJH69 $245,000.00 1/30/2026 1/30/2029 $245,000.00 $243,376.34 ($1,623.66) $245,000.00 3.700% 3.700% Celtic Bk Salt Lake 15118R4E4 $249,000.00 3/10/2026 3/10/2028 $249,000.00 $247,689.41 ($1,310.59) $249,000.00 3.650% 3.650% Negotiable CD % of Total Investment 10.125% $6,159,000.00 $6,159,000.00 $6,172,105.08 $13,105.08 $6,159,000.00 TOTAL ALL INVESTMENTS 60,831,224.05$ 60,743,919.76$ 61,001,572.31$ 259,578.02$ 60,854,672.19$ NET TOTAL OF ALL INVESTMENTS LESS BONDS FUNDS HELD 55,949,460.86$ 55,862,156.57$ 55,893,164.12$ 32,933.02$ 55,972,909.00$ Average Rate of Interest 3.460% Average Yield to Maturity 3.580% 1 Rate publishes quarterly. 2 April rate publishes the first week of June. 3 April rate publishes the last week of May. In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, the Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby certifies that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months. APPROVED: DAVID PEDERSEN, CITY TREASURER TREASURER'S REPORT APRIL 2026 Page 464 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PW-035 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF MAY 14, 2026 (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of May 14, 2026. Number of Projects by Phase # of Projects Study/Conceptual Planning 11 Preliminary Design 3 Final Engineering Design 4 Project Approvals/ Bidding 2 Construction 6 Closeout 2 Completed 8 Total Projects 36 Number of Projects by Completion Timeline # of Projects Completed in FY 25–26 11 Completed after FY 25–26 22 TBD 3 Total Projects 36 Number of Projects by Category # of Projects Street & Highway Improvements 13 Sewer & Storm Drain Improvements 4 Park Improvements 3 Public Building & Ground Improvements 16 Total Projects 36 Page 465 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 2 Number of Projects by Manager # of Projects Joe SanClemente 2 John Oskoui 4 Saad Malim 1 Heecheol Kwon 2 Brandon Araujo 3 Andrew Nguyen 5 Kristian Alarcon 2 Briana Aube 1 Magvern By 3 TBD 6 Complete 7 Total Projects 36 Attachment: 1. Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of May 14, 2026 2. Estimated CIP Project Schedule FY 2025-2026 – Updated May 14, 2026 Respectfully Submitted by: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 466 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 5-14-2026 UPDATED FY 2025-26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Light Blue indicates project milestone updates. ADA ComponentCIP No.Project Name Project CategoryProject Budget1 Project Manager Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutProject Initiation Date Estimated Project Completion Date2 Current Project Status Project Description X 106 Annual Street Improvements (New)SH $3,625,257.00 Heecheol Kwon X 08/25 09/27 In May 2025, staff applied a construction grant for $2,560,000 in funding from Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) STBG/CMAQ grant program. The project was not selected for award, but remains on SCAG's contigency list. The project design is 60% complete, and topographic survey work was completed in October 30, 2025 and being incorporatated in the overall design. Project is now being combined with CIP 115 - City Sidewalk Improvements. This project provides for pavement rehabilitation of various streets throughout the city. The project will also repair/replace deteriorated portions of sidewalk, curb and gutter, and curb ramps. This work will be performed following the sewer and storm drain repairs identified in the Sewer and Drainage Master Plans. 107 Annual Slurry Seal (New)SH $450,000.00 Magvern By X 07/25 11/26 Staff has prepared the bid package and posted it for biding on April 30, 2026 with bid opening scheduled for May 21, 2026. The anticipated start of construction is July - August 2026. This project includes slurry seal of various roadways throughout the city to preserve pavement conditions and to extend its service life. 111 Gateway and Wayfinding Signs Conceptual Design SH $575,000.00 Joe SanClemente X 07/22 07/27 The City has received a donation of $500,000 from former Mayor Chuck Sheldon and his wife Missy to fund the design, installation, construction, and maintenance of new monument signage within the City. The primary use of the funds will be for a new digital monument sign at the Community Center near Pier Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway; any remaining funds may be directed toward additional gateway monument signs at other locations in the City. The City previously received a $50,000 contribution for the electronic sign from the Chamber of Commerce in 2014; the Chamber has since advised staff that these funds can instead be directed towards the downtown wayfinding signage. Staff is preparing preliminary designs, and further evaluating permitting requirements, and anticipates bringing an item to Public Works Commision in mid-2026. Electronic sign will require Caltrans and Planning Commission approvals. Staff sumbitted a preliminary package to Caltrans on May 11, 2026 to obtain further guidance. The schedule has been revised to reflect the addtion of design, permitting, and construction phases, which are estimated at this time and subject to change based on permitting requirements. This project will evaluate gateway signage, downtown wayfinding and a marquee at the Community Center. Recommendations will include potential locations, preliminary design, and order of magnitude cost estimates for final design, sign fabrication, and installation which will require additional funding. 113 City Wide Multi-Space Meters Deployment SH $415,000.00 Andrew Nguyen X 07/23 03/27 Staff is preparing design plans for multi space meter installations along Pier Ave and in Lot D. Installation of multi space meters in Lots A, B, and C to start in April 2026. This project will include the installation of additional signage for the Pay-By-App parking system for on-street parking spaces and replacement of single space meters with multi-space meter equipment. This CIP will include the first phase of deployment which may include Pier Avenue and parking Lot D. This effort will involve purchase of equipment, development of signage layout plans (as meters and signage would need to be removed and placed with new signage), and installation. 114 Greenwich Village North Undergrounding District - Phase I - Civil Improvements SH $4,031,600.00 Brandon Araujo X 07/25 10/27 City Council awarded the contract at the July 22, 2025 meeting. The City obtained the bond proceeds to fund the project on August 14, 2025. Construction contract executed on August 16, 2025. Pre-construction meeting with the contractor held in mid-September 2025. Execution of agreements with SCE and Frontier completed in October 2025. Exploratory utility activities began in February 2026. Groundbreaking for the project was February 25, 2026. Construction started March 2026. As of March 31, 2026, two of the five vaults for the project have been installed and roughly one-third of the main line conduits have been installed. As of April 31, 2026, all five of the vaults for the project have been installed and roughly 75% of the main line conduits have been installed. This project will consist of the undergrounding of the existing overhead utility lines within the Greenwich Village North Underground Utilities Assessment District. X 115 Citywide Sidewalk Improvements (New)SH $607,211.00 Kristian Alarcon X 02/27 09/27 Project is being combined with CIP 106 Annual Street Improvements.This project includes the design and construction of priority sidewalk and pedestrian safety improvements citywide, providing pedestrian corsswalk and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at the intersection of Ardmore Avenue at both Longfellow Avenue and 25th Street. 164 Hermosa Avenue Green Street SH $368,286.00 Briana Aube X 02/18 08/26 The City of Torrance is the lead agency for the project and awarded a construction contract to Excel Paving Inc. in May 2025. A preconstruction meeting was held on Dec. 16 , 2025 for construction in Hermosa Beach. Construction started in City of Torrance portion of the project in July 2025. Construction in Hermosa Beach began on February 2nd, 2026. Installation of permeable gutters and tree planting on Hermosa Ave. will be complete by May 2026, and the project close-out is estimated to be complete by August 2026. This project will install permeable gutters to increase stormwater infiltration on Hermosa Avenue, Beach Drive, Herondo Street, 6th Street, 2nd Street, 1st Street, and adjacent streets. This project is part of a multi-city green street project led by the City of Torrance and funded by Measure W. 421 Annual Sewer Improvements - Phase 2 SD $3,865,610.00 Andrew Nguyen X 11/19 05/26 Project is complete with closeout in progress. Anticipated completion date has been pushed back due to a number of delays: redesign on Loma Dr, soil conditions and utility conflicts that necessitate extensive handdigging, undisclosed concrete encasements that impeded timely sewer removal and replacement, an emergency sewer collapse on 11th Street in mid-April, the discovery of over a dozen laterals on 11th Street between Prospect Avenue and Harper Avenue that were not shown on the Plans that needed to be reconnected to the new sewer main, a residential emergency backup on 17th Street that was tangentially related to our project, and additional paving has been added to the project. Contract awarded on July 9, 2024. Construction Agreement was fully executed on August 15, 2024. Construction started September 16, 2024. Phase 1 of this project, which included lining, was completed. Phase 2 of this project includes design and construction of sewer improvements and repairs based on the Sewer Master Plan. Improvements will include approximately 128 sewer pipe point repairs, approximately 7,315 linear feet of CIPP sewer lining rehabilitation, approximately 1725 linear feet of sewer pipe removal and replacement, and approximately 16 maintenance access hole rehabilitations. Sewer repairs will take place at various locations throughout the city as part of this project. ACTIVE PROJECTS 1 of 5 Page 467 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 5-14-2026 UPDATED FY 2025-26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Light Blue indicates project milestone updates. ADA ComponentCIP No.Project Name Project CategoryProject Budget1 Project Manager Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutProject Initiation Date Estimated Project Completion Date2 Current Project Status Project Description 438 Stormwater Dry Wells Assessment SD $175,000.00 Heecheol Kwon X 10/23 TBD Staff met with the EWMP consultant, Geosyntec, on August 18, 2025 to discuss the number of drywells and alternative locations, design concept and funding application options. Staff is evaluating options to advance and enhanced feasibility study. Staff assessed the option of collaborating with the City of Redondo Beach on seeking outside funding to advance the design and construction. Measure W committee will soon begin accepting new funding applications. The City is tentatively planning to submit the funding application in June 2026. Staff met with the City of Redondo Beach to discuss an additional feasibility study to be performed by Geosyntec for alternate BMP system locations. Council awarded a contract to Geosyntec at its March 10, 2026 meeting to perform this work. As required by the region’s Enhanced Watershed Management Plan (EWMP), this project will assess the implementation of a series of drywells east of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) between 1st Street and 10th Street to capture storm water and dry weather flows within 118 acres of the Herondo Drain (SMB-6-1) watershed. 504 Playground Equipment Replacement Project (New)PK $450,000.00 Laney Wilson X 07/25 01/27 The purchase of playground equipment through a cooperative purchase agreement was approved at the November 17, 2025 City Council Meeting. Playground equipment has been procured and staff is preparing a package for advertisement to retain a qualified contractor for installation. The project was advertised for construction on April 30, 2026 with bid opening scheduled for May 26, 2026. This project will provide playground enhancements in three City Parks. Work will include a full replacement of the two-to-five- year old play structure with a new unit that has integrated shade and a new rubberized mat at Valley Park. Repairs will also be made to the existing 5 to 12 year old structure and incorporate an integrated shade sail. Seaview Park will receive a full replacement of the existing play structure with a new unit with an integrated shade sail and rubberized mat. South Park will receive a replacement rubberized mat at center playfield area. X 615 New Corporate Yard Facilities 3 PB $1,889,278.00 Joe SanClemente X 07/15 04/29 At the May 13, 2025 CIP Study Session, Council directed staff to hold a joint study session with PW Commission to discuss desired project delivery method (i.e., design build vs design-bid-build). Project delivery method options were presented to PW Commission on July 16, 2025. On September 9, 2025 Council directed staff to proceed with advertising for an Owner Representative (OR) through an RFQ, hiring an architect to determine project programming needs, and move forward with updated environmental assessments. The RFQ for the OR was advertised on September 10, 2025, Statement of Qualifications received on October 9, 2025, consultant interviews for top ranked firms were conducted in November. Council awarded a professional services agreement contract to Cumming Group for OR services at its January 13, 2026 meeting. Staff held a project kick-off meeting with Cumming Group on January 27, 2026. Follownig two rounds of review and negotiation with on-call architects, staff selected IDS Group to lead the architectural programming effort; kick off meeting held on April 6, 2026. IDS group is moving forward with site programming. Staff repreared and isued an RFP for CEQA and envirnmental services on 2/19/26; proposals recieved on 3/16/26 and staff is taking contract for award at May 26, 2026 Council meeting. Current project funding for design only; construction funding will need to be identified. This project is for the design and construction of a new City Yard. The current City Yard is in need of reconstruction. A new City Yard will provide a safe and functional area for City maintenance crews and staging. X 619 Kelly Courts Improvements PB $1,161,681.00 Kristian Alarcon X 07/22 09/26 Bids opened on August 28, 2025 and construction contract was awarded to All American Construction Solutions at the September 30, 2025 City Council Meeting. Contract executed November 4, 2025. Pre-construction meeting occured October 29, 2025 with NTP issued and construction started on November 17, 2025. Construction has been completed with punchlist work underway except for court resurfacing at tennis and pickleball courts. Design modifications to account for unforeseen conditions have delayed the project and require additional contingency which were taken to Council at the January 27, 2026 meeting. Due to change in conditions on the tennis court and pickleball courts, staff is requesting proposals from other contractors to finish the court resurfacing on those courts. Basketball courts were opened for use on April 20, 2026. Staff has selected a completion contractor to complete the tennis and pickleball court resurfacing which will be brought to the May 26, 2026 Council meeting for consideration of award; should Council award the contract, the construction is anticpated to be complete in August 2026. This project will resurface and reconfigure the Kelly Courts at Clark Field and restore all four pickleball courts. The courts will be restriped and reconfigured and the lights and fencing relocated and updated to meet current design standards. 623 Pier Structural Inspection, Evaluation, and Repairs PB $3,717,137.00 John Oskoui X 07/24 08/27 Notice to Proceed was issued on August 12, 2025 for an on-call structural engineer to prepare design plans, specifications and estimates and obtain necessary permits for the high priority repairs. Final design package is being finalized. Army Corp and Water Board have confirmed that the project will be exempt from requiring a permit. Coastal Commission has completed review and anticpates approving the project as a waiver at its June 2026 meeting. Coastal had required several supplemental studies that were completed by the City's biologist (Eelgrass Survey and Aquatic Habitat Assessment). Staf is preparing to advertise the project following Coastal final approval. Staff was notified by the LA County Parks Regional Park and Open Space District that the City was not selected for the Measure A Grant Program due to a highly competitive pool of application this cycle. Staff has completed the cost-benefit analysis for long term maintenance or rebuilding the pier and presented this to the City Council on March 24. Staff to bring an item to Public Works Commision for further discussion at a future date. An emergency partial inspection and evaluation was performed in coordination with CIP 629 and CIP 660, the results of which identified high priority repairs which were completed through CIP 629. Following completion of construction of CIP 629 and CIP 660, a full above and below water structural inspection of the pier is required to meet requirements for marine structures. Based on this inspection, it is anticipated that additional pier structural repairs will be required primarily on the pier deck. This project will also include design and permitting. Construction funding will be identified as part of a future CIP. X 626 CDBG Sidewalk Improvements (New)SH $184,000.00 Magvern By X 07/25 08/26 Bid package advertised for construction January 22, 2026. Bids opened on February 12, 2026 and construction contract was awarded to TVR Construction Engineering at the April 14, 2026 City Council Meeting. Pre-Construction meeting conducted on April 21, 2026. NTP issued and construction started on April 27, 2026 with an anticipated completion by end of May 2026. This project provides improvements to sidewalks and curb ramps on Monterey Boulevard in order to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meet the latest Federal Standards. 2 of 5 Page 468 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 5-14-2026 UPDATED FY 2025-26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Light Blue indicates project milestone updates. ADA ComponentCIP No.Project Name Project CategoryProject Budget1 Project Manager Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutProject Initiation Date Estimated Project Completion Date2 Current Project Status Project Description 630 Community Center Gas Repairs PB $350,000.00 John Oskoui X 03/25 06/26 Bid package advertised for construction on July 7, 2025. Bids opened on August 12, 2025 and Council awarded contract at the September 9, 2025 City Council Meeting. Pre-construction meeting conducted on October, 8, 2026. NTP issued and construction started October, 27, 2025. Project is nearing completion as the contractor provides final roof penetrations and connections. There was a substantial delay with abatement work required for ceiling penetrations to run new gas lines in the both the north and south wings of the Community Center. Council approved an increase in the project contigency on March 10, 2026 to cover unforseen conditons; change ordered work is in process. Coordination with SCG to approve and energize the system has been initaited and final connection and pressure testing is scheduled to be completed by the end of April. Anticipated completion of the project by the end of June 2026. The project includes the design and installation of a new natural gas service connection to the Community Center. Staff identified leaks in the existing gas service which needed to be shut off to ensure safety and can not be easily repaired. The project will restore service. 635 Community Center Windows (New)PB $300,000.00 John Oskoui X 07/25 06/28 City's consultant, Westgroupdesigns, completed preliminary needs assessment study for the windows and order of magnitude cost estimate has been developed for budgeting purposes. Staff will be working on developing a scope of services for the design and permitting phase. This project will evaluate windows replacement for the entire facility to address deferred maintenance needs. The existing windows present safety and security concerns due to poor conditions. This project is currently funded for design and permitting only; additional funding will be required for installation once costs are further defined. 685 Real Time Crime Center PB $860,542.98 Brandon Araujo X 07/24 06/27 The project is funded through a federal grant. The grant agreement has been fully executed, with project completion required by March 31, 2026; PD recieved a one year grant extension approval. PW is working closely with PD and City Manager's office on advancing the infrastructure components of the project . Staff is also working to advance other critical elements of the project including additional security cameras and the overall software integration that will be the main component of bringing all our existing programs and hardware together with new technology. Staff received sole-source approval to procure the services of Am-Tec security and City Council awarded a construction agreement to them at its October 28, 2025 meeting. Contract has been executed and the City is currently reviewing Am-Tec's submittals. Materials used on the project are subject to Buy America Preference as specified in the grant agreement and the City is working with the COPS office to obtain Buy America waivers for these materials. The project is facing delays due to the recent government shutdown which cotinues to delay the processing of the grant extension and assistance with the waivers. The City has requested a determination from the COPS as to what, if any, materials associated with the project are subject to the Buy America Preference. This project is to create a Real Time Crime Center (RTCC) for the City of Hermosa Beach. A RTCC is a technology-driven support center which uses state of the art technology to provide real time information to officers and detectives working in the field and investigating crimes that are reported. X 699 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements PB $3,080,813.00 Saad Malim X 07/19 06/26 Construction is completed with final punchlist items completed on May 14, 2026. Notice of Completion and project closeout pending.This project provides necessary structural, electrical, elevator repairs and improvements to the City's Parking Structure (Lot C). The project advanced on two separate tracks: the elevator modernization and the structural repairs. X 102 Bus Stops Improvements - Phase 2 SH $372,000.00 Andrew Nguyen X 7/1/2022 06/28 Phase 2, 30% Design is on hold pending staff availability and further information on any potential for grant award. Staff is actively working on seeking outside grant funding for the project through the South Bay Cities Council of Governments. Staff submitted a grant application for $440,000 in Measure M funds on January 16, 2025. Funding was approved by the SBCCOG Board and Metro staff. Staff is working with Metro staff on a funding agreement which may require Council approval (anticipated Summer 2026). This project will improve bus stops throughout the city. These improvements will include Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible curb ramps, crosswalk, striping improvements, furnishing, and other general improvements within direct vicinity of the bus stops. This project is combined with CIP 193 Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements. Phase 1 of the combined project was constructed in spring 2024, and installed Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) and updated signage and striping at select pedestrian crossings on Hermosa Avenue, Manhattan Avenue, Pier Avenue, and Valley Drive. Phase 2 of this combined project will holistically evaluate the safety and accessibility in the vicinity of bus stops on Hermosa Avenue and at select other critical locations throughout the city then design and construct improvements. X 143 PCH Mobility Improvement Project SH $42,375.00 Brandon Araujo X 07/18 TBD The Project is temporarily paused. Metro has reassigned new project manager to oversee the project. The project remains on hold while Metro resolves consultant contract services agreement to further advance the project through the PA&ED phase. Staff worked closeley with Metro to seek additional funding through the South Bay Cities Council of Governments. Staff submitted a grant application for $3,000,000 in Measure M funds on January 16, 2025. Funding was approved by the SBCCOG Board and Metro. Metro is working on the draft scope of work and funding agreement with Caltrans. Following Caltrans review, staff will work with Metro on final review and bring funding agreement to City Council for consideration (anticipated Summer 2026). The City has identified a number of complete street project elements that can be implemented to improve mobility, accessibility, and safety along the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) corridor in Hermosa Beach. These elements are described in the Project Study Report prepared by the City and Caltrans in 2015 and include: Traffic Signal Synchronization, Landscape Medians, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements/Removal of Utility Impediments, Transit Access Enhancements, Pedestrian Enhancements, and Aesthetic Enhancements. Collectively, the improvements will address existing, near-term, and long-range future traffic conditions along this corridor by improving intersection operations, reducing instances of unsafe turning movements, creating a safe and more comfortable environment for pedestrians and transit riders, and improving the efficient movement of vehicles along the corridor. P E N D I N G P R O J E C T S 3 of 5 Page 469 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 5-14-2026 UPDATED FY 2025-26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Light Blue indicates project milestone updates. ADA ComponentCIP No.Project Name Project CategoryProject Budget1 Project Manager Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutProject Initiation Date Estimated Project Completion Date2 Current Project Status Project Description X 193 Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements - Phase 2 SH $128,000.00 Andrew Nguyen X 07/22 06/28 Phase 2, 30% Design is on hold pending staff availability and further information on any potential for grant award. Staff is actively working on seeking outside grant funding for the project through the South Bay Cities Council of Governments. Staff submitted a grant application for $440,000 in Measure M funds on January 16, 2025. Funding was approved by the SBCCOG Board and Metro. Staff is working with Metro staff on a funding agreement which may require Council approval (anticipated Summer 2026). This project will implement rectangular rapid flashing beacons and other measures at several uncontrolled pedestrian crossings on Hermosa Avenue at 4th, 6th, 19th, 24th, and 25th Streets. This project is combined with CIP 102 Bus Stop Improvements. Phase 1 of the combined project was constructed in spring 2024, and installed Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) and updated signing and striping at select pedestrian crossings on Hermosa Avenue, Manhattan Avenue, Pier Avenue, and Valley Drive. Phase 2 of this combined project will holistically evaluate options to reconfigure parking to enhance pedestrian safety, feasibility of curb extensions and median closures, and accessibility on Hermosa Avenue and at select other critical locations throughout the city then design and construct improvements. 417 Storm Drain Improvements - Various Locations SD $827,421.00 TBD X 07/17 05/28 Staff completed emergency storm drain work on Valley Drive south of Gould Avenue in August 2025. Emergency contract ratification to be considered by City Council at August 26, 2025 meeting. Full project scope pending staff availability. This project will design and construct storm drain improvements throughout the city per the Storm Drain Master Plan and other high priority locations. 423 Annual Sewer Improvements SD $1,011,003.00 Andrew Nguyen X 07/20 12/27 Staff is working to identify scope and locations of necessary sewer improvements based on the Sewer Management Plan and noted reported problem areas. Project schedule is delayed due to unforeseen project delays on CIP 421. This project includes design and construction of sewer improvements and repairs based on the Sewer Master Plan. Improvements will include lining, point repairs, removal and replacement. 610 Fort Lots-of-Fun Park Wall and Gate Improvements PK $150,042.00 TBD X 07/23 11/26 Pending staff availability This project provides necessary improvements and repairs to the existing retaining wall and wooden gate at Fort Lots-of-Fun. The project currently includes funding for design of the improvements; construction costs will be further defined through the design process. 611 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements - Phase 2 PB $300,000.00 TBD X 07/25 06/28 Pending staff availability. Project schedule is delayed pending further structural investigation of facility as part of Phase I construction.This project will address other necessary repairs to the parking structure identified in the comprehensive structural evaluation of the facility identified in the detailed structural assessment, not covered in CIP 699. 618 Tsunami Siren PB $100,000.00 TBD X 07/22 TBD Pending staff availability. At the May 13, 2025 CIP Study Session, City Council directed staff to delay the project one year and revisit.This grant-funded project will include working with the Emergency Management Coordinator and the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors to install an outdoor warning siren and integrate the selected siren and the Beach Emergency Evacuation Lighting System (BEELS) systems into the City's alert and warning software platform, Alert South Bay. 621 Comprehensive Downtown Lighting Design PB $142,284.00 TBD X 07/22 03/27 Pending staff availability.This project will assess light levels, electric system requirements, and desired lighting improvements (i.e., ornamental, roadway, pedestrian scale) for the City's Downtown district. The project will identify scope of required improvements and cost estimates for final design and construction. X 625 Citywide ADA Improvements PB $238,039.00 TBD X 07/24 03/28 Pending staff availability.This project will provide improvements to access to the Civic Center to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meet the latest Federal Standards along with the City’s Transition Plan. The project will provide improvements to curb ramps, sidewalk, and parking in front of City Hall and install a wheelchair lift for access from the Valley Drive parking lot to the front of City Hall. X 105 Annual Street Improvements SH $602,974.00 Briana Aube 04/24 10/25 Combined with CIP 695. Construction completed on July 25, 2025 (5 months ahead of original schedule). Notice of Completion recorded 9/10/25. Retention released and project closed out October 2025. Project advertised on 12/12/24 (4 months ahead of schedule), bid opening on 01/15/25. Construction contract awarded by Council on February 25, 2025. Pre-construction meeting was on March 19, 2025. NTP and start of construction April 7, 2025. This project provided for pavement rehabilitation of various streets throughout the city including paving and striping of approximately 2 miles of streets. The project also repaired/replaced deteriorated portions of sidewalk, curb and gutter, and curb ramps. This work will be performed following the sewer and storm drain repairs identified in the Sewer and Drainage Master Plans. This project is combined with CIP 695 Parking Lot A Improvements. 109 Utility Box Wrappings SH $26,516.00 Karla Vargas 07/21 12/25 All art has been designed and installed on the 24 utility boxes.This project will add decorative paint and/or wraps to city-owned utility boxes throughout the city. The City is engaging a local artist cooperative to create the artwork that will either be painted or applied via vinyl wrap to the boxes. City Yard staff, who have been trained in wrap application, will be involved in this project. 603 South Park Slope, Irrigation, and Landscape Improvements PK $1,400,141.00 Magvern By 07/21 05/26 Project has been completed and Notice of completion has been filed and recorded November 7, 2025. Project closeout in process. Staff secured $189,849 of supplemental funding from California State Parks. Staff also secured $96,242 from the West Basin Turf Removal Grant program. Staff is working on obtaining Grant reiumbursement. Inspection with West Basin will be on January 28, 2026. Bid package advertised for construction November 21, 2024. Bids opened January 23, 2025. Construction contract awarded by Council on February 25, 2025. NTP and start of construction was April 14, 2025. This project will address repairs needed throughout the north side of the park including installing a new irrigation system and landscaping including on the sloped areas. X 605 City Facilities Condition and Needs Assessment PB $346,530.00 Joe SanClemente 07/23 07/25 Civic Facilities Project Advisory Group presented Council Consideration and Direction on Recommendations from their findings based on regular advisory group meetings at the July 22, 2025 Council meeting. Council voted to receive and file recommendations from the City Manager’s Civic Facilities Project Advisory Group. The project will include an assessment of facilities throughout the City to understand improvement needs. 617 Civic Center Charging Stations PB $51,857.00 Magvern By 07/22 05/25 City staff is coordinating the phasing of this work with SCE and their subcontractors. Phase 1, which is the installation of new switchgear pad and conduit to supply power to the new charging stations was completed on the week of October 14, 2024. The first part of Phase 2, which is the running of electrical wires to all charging station locations of the charging stations was completed December 2024. Second part of Phase 2 which is the installation and connection of the switch gear and meter was completed February 6, 2025. SCE energized the new swithgear on April 8, 2025.The electric charges were activated on May 15, 2025 and are fully operational. This project will explore the electrical power needs and installation of expanded electric vehicle charging infrastructure to serve the Police Department fleet on Bard Street, adjacent the Police Department and City Hall. The expanded charging infrastructure will install 20 Level 2 chargers. COMPLETED PROJECTS 4 of 5 Page 470 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach Updated 5-14-2026 UPDATED FY 2025-26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Light Blue indicates project milestone updates. ADA ComponentCIP No.Project Name Project CategoryProject Budget1 Project Manager Conceptual PlanningPreliminary DesignFinal Engineering DesignProject Approvals/BiddingConstructionCloseoutProject Initiation Date Estimated Project Completion Date2 Current Project Status Project Description 633 Base 3 Electrical Improvements PB $300,000.00 John Oskoui 03/25 02/26 Bid package advertised for construction May 22, 2025. Bids opened June 25, 2025 and awarded to Delta Electrical, LLC under City Manager contract authority. Contract executed. NTP issued September 8, 2025. Construction started September 15, 2025 and anticipated completion of construction in November 2025. SCE installing new meter to energize the building on November 13, 2025. Contractor to return to test equipment and finalize as needed before re-occupancy of the building. Construction completed on December 5, 2025. Notice of Completion recorded January 7, 2026 and project closeout pending. Retention released and project closed out January 27, 2026. The project includes the design and construction of electrical upgrades and repairs to the City's Community Services building (Base 3) at 1035 Valley Drive. These necessary improvements will allow for safe reopening of the facility that has been closed for use following the electrical fire that occurred October 2025. X 689 Clark Building Renovations PB $414,607.00 Saad Malim 07/17 11/25 Notice of Completion recorded 12/10/25. Retention release and project closed 12/10/25. Staff continues to work on grant reimbursement for full electrification of the building through the Clean Power Alliance. The renovations will include the following: New commercial kitchen per current Los Angeles County Department of Public Health requirements, including new appliances, fixtures, storage cabinets, counter tops, flooring, grease trap system, and lighting; New electric powered heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system; New audio-visual system including built-in speakers, overhead projector, and roll-down projection screen; Architectural upgrades including:Furred out walls to hide system components such as electrical conduit and provide a new X 695 Parking Lot A Improvements PB $207,368.00 Briana Aube 07/19 10/25 Construction completed on July 25, 2025 (5 months ahead of original schedule). Notice of Completion recorded 9/10/25. Retention released and project closed out October 2025. This project will provide pavement rehabilitation in Parking Lot A. 5 of 5 Page 471 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach - Department of Public Works Estimated CIP Project Schedule FY 2025-2026 - Updated 05/14/26 Supervisor/PM May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 421 Annual Sewer Improvements Brandon/Andrew 5 400 603 South Park Slope and Irrigation Repairs Brandon/Magvern 5 295 630 Community Center Gas Repair John O /Josh 5 5 335 619 Kelly Court Renovations Randy/Kristian 40 20 20 5 5 640 164 Hermosa Avenue Green Street Heecheol/Briana 30 15 10 5 300 699 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements - Phase 1 Saad 20 10 570 626 CDBG Sidewalk Improvements (NEW)Randy/Magvern 50 20 10 5 250 107 Slurry Seal (NEW)Heecheol/Magvern 20 35 90 70 10 5 5 375 504 Playground Equipment Replacement Project (NEW)John O/Laney 10 15 15 15 50 50 10 5 5 315 685 Real Time Crime Center Brandon 30 30 30 40 40 30 30 30 30 40 30 30 25 20 20 5 5 705 114 Greenwich Village North Undergrounding (NEW)Brandon/Briana 90 100 70 70 70 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 10 5 5 1300 106 Annual Streets Improvements (NEW)Heecheol/Kristian 80 70 30 20 20 30 40 80 80 80 80 80 80 20 15 10 5 1240 115 City Sidewalk Improvements (NEW)Heecheol/Kristian 20 113 City Wide Multi-Space Meters Deployment - Phase I Ken/Brandon/Andrew 30 40 30 20 25 40 30 30 20 10 5 435 623 Pier Structural Repairs Joe/Saad/Magvern 40 40 30 25 30 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 40 30 20 15 10 1300 111 Gateway and Wayfinding Signs Assessment Joe/Brandon/Kristian 20 35 35 35 35 35 25 15 15 15 40 40 40 15 5 870 635 Community Center Windows (NEW)John O/Saad 5 10 20 30 35 40 40 50 50 50 15 15 10 30 60 65 65 60 60 20 15 15 5 935 618 Tsunami Siren Moe 20 20 20 25 25 25 25 20 10 30 25 25 25 15 5 5 320 423 Annual Sewer Improvements Brandon/Andrew 20 20 20 60 60 60 60 60 60 30 20 20 40 80 80 80 80 80 80 75 20 5 5 1155 625 City Wide ADA Improvements Randy/Laney 25 25 25 50 50 50 50 40 40 40 40 20 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 10 5 5 735 610 Fort Lots-O-Fun Wall and Gate Improvements TBD 20 20 40 40 40 40 50 30 20 20 30 70 70 70 60 25 10 5 660 417 Annual Storm Drain Improvements Heecheol/25 30 30 80 80 50 40 40 40 50 50 50 50 40 20 20 100 80 90 90 90 80 40 20 10 1315 102 Bus Stop Improvements PHASE II Brandon/Andrew 10 10 15 15 30 30 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 50 40 30 30 30 100 100 100 193 Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements PHASE II Brandon/Andrew 611 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements - Phase 2 (NEW)John O/Saad 5 5 10 10 30 30 30 35 35 35 30 20 20 25 25 70 80 80 70 60 15 5 5 730 615 New Corporate Yard Facilities Joe / John O / Saad / Randy 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 120 120 130 130 150 150 180 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 300 5010 438 Stormwater Dry Wells Assessment Heecheol/Briana 20 20 20 20 10 15 20 20 50 50 50 50 50 50 30 30 40 40 70 70 70 300 1175 143 PCH Mobility Improvement Project PHASE II Joe/Brandon 15 15 15 15 15 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 1000 2045 621 Comprehensive Downtown Lighting Design 20 20 20 40 35 30 30 30 30 50 50 355 TBD FUTURE ANNUAL PAVING PROJECTS 25 70 70 70 70 70 70 20 40 40 80 360 985 TBD FUTURE CDBG PROJECTS 20 40 40 25 10 15 50 50 15 10 5 5 285 TBD FUTURE ANNUAL ADA PROJECT 20 20 20 40 40 40 450 630 TBD FUTURE ANNUAL SIDEWALK PROJECTS 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 40 40 450 750 TBD FUTURE PIER DECK REPAIRS 30 30 30 30 70 70 70 70 70 1000 1470 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Total Hours Needed 640 685 690 650 745 790 725 835 795 795 755 765 715 610 680 675 715 830 830 795 810 780 655 660 615 645 3.721 3.983 4.012 3.779 4.331 4.593 4.215 4.855 4.622 4.622 4.39 4.448 4.157 3.547 3.953 3.924 4.157 4.826 4.826 4.622 4.709 4.535 3.808 3.837 3.576 3.75 Projected Staff Capacity 630 630 630 630 630 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 3.663 3.663 3.663 3.663 3.663 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 4.07 Availability (Deficit) - Full Staff 60 15 10 50 (45)(90)(25)(135)(95)(95)(55)(65)(15)90 20 25 (15)(130)(130)(95)(110)(80)45 40 85 55 Availability (Deficit) - Current Staff (Hours)(10)(55)(60)(20)(115)(90)(25)(135)(95)(95)(55)(65)(15)90 20 25 (15)(130)(130)(95)(110)(80)45 40 85 55 Assumptions:Legend: Administrative staff is available to assist engineers with tasks such as answering phones, preparing invoices and contracts, etc.Preparation of request for proposals or on-call task order. PW engineers manage consultant design teams, oversee construction, write staff reports, develop RFPs, etc.Evaluation, conceptual design, or final design. 1700 hours total annual availability per engineer (2080 hours minus holidays, vacation, and sick time).Advertisement for construction (bid document preparation, advertisement, bid review, award at City Council, contract execution). Construction Project close out, including final invoicing, documentaion, reporting to grant agencies. Fixed schedule due to public safety need, grant/funding timeline, or regulatory requirements. CIP No.Project Name FY 25-26 FY 26-27 Engineering Labor Est. (Hrs) Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY 27-28 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Beyond Total 1670 FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 310 Full staffing assumes 10 engineers average approximately 50% of availability for CIPs (0.5*1680)/12 = 70 hours monthly per engineer, therefore 708 hours total monthly availability for CIP work in the engineering team. Current staffing levels in May 2026 are 9 (or 90%). This schedule assumes reaching full staffing levels (100%) by October 2026. Actual schedules are subject to change. Depending on staffing. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Q4Q2Q3Q4Q1 Page 472 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach - Department of Public Works Estimated CIP Project Schedule FY 2025-2026 - Updated 05/14/26 Supervisor/PM May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun CIP No.Project Name FY 25-26 FY 26-27 Engineering Labor Est. (Hrs) Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY 27-28 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Beyond Total COMPLETE 424 Annual Storm Drain Improvements (Bard Street) Heecheol/Briana 617 Civic Center Charging Stations Heecheol/Magvern 605 City Facilities Condition and Needs Assessment Joe 105 Annual Street Improvements Heecheol/Briana 695 Parking Lot A Improvements Heecheol/Briana 502 Greenbelt Pedestrian Trail Brandon/Andrew 604 City Wide ADA Improvements Brandon/Andrew 194 Annual Striping Improvements Brandon/Andrew 689 Clark Building Renovations Saad/Karla 109 Utility Box Wrappings Saad/Karla 603 South Park Slope and Irrigation Repairs Brandon/Magvern 633 Base 3 Electrical Improvements John O /Josh Page 473 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 5 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PW-026 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE COMPLETION OF CIP 619 KELLY COURTS IMPROVEMENTS TO GR PAVING SOLUTIONS CEQA: The Project is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and section 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction). The proposed work is an alteration of existing public structures or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing use. Further the proposed work consists of reconstruction of existing court structures where the new courts will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. No exceptions to the CEQA exemption apply. (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Award a construction contract for the completion of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project 619–Kelly Courts Improvements to GR Paving Solutions in the amount of $106,650.00 (Attachment 1); 2. Authorize the Director of Public Works to establish a contract contingency in the amount of $26,663 and to approve contract change orders up to the amount of the approved project contingency; 3. Adopt the attached resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach Approving the Construction of CIP 619 Kelly Courts Improvements Project Pursuant to Government Code Section 830.6 and Establishing a Project Payment Account” (Attachment 2); 4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the construction contract, approve minor modifications as necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk to attesting the agreements, subject to approval by the City Attorney; and 5. Authorize the Director of Public Works to file a Notice of Completion following final completion of the project. Executive Summary: On September 30, 2025, the City Council awarded a construction contract for CIP 619– Kelly Courts Improvements to All-American Construction solutions for the renovation of the Kelly Courts and construction started on November 17, 2025. During the course of construction, the existing pavement conditions differed at the tennis and pickleball courts and were found to be approximately 2 inches of deteriorated asphalt overlaying 2 inches Page 474 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 5 of concrete. All scope from the original construction contract except for the resurfacing and striping of the tennis and pickleball courts has been completed and it was determined to be in the City’s best interest to proceed with a completion contractor due to the unforeseen conditions and specialized resurfacing methods associated with the existing deteriorated tennis and pickleball court surfaces. Staff solicited proposals from multiple contractors for the completion of the court renovations and recommends that the City Council award a construction contract to GR Paving Solutions. Background: On September 30, 2025, the City Council awarded a construction contract for CIP 619 – Kelly Courts Improvements to All-American Construction solutions for the renovation of the Kelly Courts. The scope of work included renovating the existing pickleball, tennis, and basketball courts, collectively identified as Kelly Courts. Following site evaluation and initial construction efforts, it was discovered that the pavement section at the tennis and pickleball courts consisted of approximately 2 inches of deteriorated asphalt overlaying 2 inches of concrete, a condition that was not fully identified during the design phase. The extent and nature of the asphalt distress required specialized resurfacing methods beyond the original contractor’s capabilities and scope. Due to these unforeseen conditions, the contractor was unable to complete the court resurfacing at the tennis and pickleball courts work as originally planned. To avoid further delays and ensure the project is completed to industry standards, staff reached out to multiple contractors with expertise in court resurfacing systems and asphalt rehabilitation techniques. Proposals were requested to address the existing site conditions and complete the intended improvements. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description September 30, 2025 Council Awarded a construction contract for Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project 619–Kelly Courts Improvements to All-American Construction Solutions in the amount of $825,999. January 27, 2026 Council accepted a donation of funds from the Hermosa Beach Youth Basketball League in the amount of $14,224 for the upgrade of basketball court equipment and authorize the Director of Public Works to increase the total project contingency amount on the Kelly Courts Improvement project to $244,942. Page 475 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 5 Analysis: Staff received and evaluated proposals from 8 qualified contractors experienced in athletic court resurfacing, asphalt rehabilitation and crack mitigation systems with varying methods. The evaluation considered contractor experience, proposed repair methodology, cost, durability of the repair, and ability to complete the work in a timely manner. Staff evaluated available proposals and determined that GR Paving Solutions offers the most suitable combination of materials, repair methodology, and warranty provisions to ensure the courts are resurfaced in accordance with applicable standards while delivering a high-quality and durable playing surface. GR Paving Solutions demonstrated the necessary expertise in addressing distressed asphalt surfaces and provided a comprehensive approach to repairing cracks and installing a durable court surfacing system. Several of the repair methods proposed by other contractors were either not cost effective or did not provide adequate durability assurances. Staff received a proposal from GR Paving Solutions on May 4, 2026, for $106,650 (Attachment 3). Scope of work included for the completion contract:  2-inch Asphalt Grind and Overlay;  Resurfacing of existing Portland cement concrete (PCC) surface by filling all cracks and patch where needed;  Install Paving Fabric;  Construct 2” AC Paving over existing surface; and  Tennis and Pickleball Court resurfacing. Staff confirmed GR Paving Solutions’ contractor license is active and in good standing with the Contractor’s State License Board. Staff contacted GR Paving Solutions references and confirmed their competency through completion of recent projects of similar scope of work. Overall, staff finds GR Paving Solutions to be a qualified contractor to complete the proposed work for the subject project and recommends City Council award the construction contract to GR Paving Solutions (Attachment 1). Awarding this completion contract will allow the City to properly remediate the unforeseen subsurface conditions and complete CIP 619, restoring the Kelly Courts to safe, high - quality, and playable conditions. The contractor has indicated availability to begin work within 2 to 3 weeks of notice to proceed. The new asphalt will require up to 30 days to properly cure before the court resurfacing materials can be applied. Staff anticipates the courts could be reopened tentatively in August in 2026 and pending final schedule from the Contractor following approvals. Page 476 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 5 Environmental Analysis: The Project is exempt under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities). The proposed work is a minor alteration of existing public structures or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing use. Further the Project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction) as the proposed work consists of reconstruction of existing court structures where the new courts will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. No exceptions to the CEQA exemption apply. Options for City Council Consideration: City Council may consider the following options relating to the award of the completion construction contract. 1) Award the construction contract (recommended) to GR Paving Solutions to allow the for the completion of the remaining resurfacing work on the tennis and pickleball courts so the courts can be opened for use. 2) Reject the construction contract and the tennis and pickleball courts at Kelly Courts will remain closed. Fiscal Impact: CIP 619 Kelly Courts Improvements is currently budgeted in the FY 2026-27 Budget. GR Paving Solutions submitted its proposal at $106,650. Staff recommends establishing a contingency of $26,663 to cover any unforeseen conditions or additional work required during construction for a total construction contract budget of $133,313. Agreement Request Agreement FY 2025-26 Budget Account # Authorized Amount GR Paving Solutions 301-8619-4201 $ 106,650 Project Contingency $ 26,663 Total: $ 133,313 Sufficient funding is available in the project budget to cover construction costs for the completion of CIP 619 Kelly Courts Improvements; no additional appropriations are needed. Attachments: 1. Draft Construction Contract 2. Draft Resolution 3. Construction Cost Proposal 4. CIP 619 – Kelly Court Improvement Project Plans Page 477 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 5 Respectfully Submitted by: Kristian Alarcon, Assistant Engineer Concur: Saad Malim, City Engineer Concur: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Concur: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 478 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 BBK (01/2026) CITY OF HERM OSA BEACH CONTRACT DOCUM ENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CIP 619 – KELLY COURTS IMPROVEMENTS May 26, 2026 City of Hermosa Beach Page 479 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 00 41 43 – BID FORMS .............................................................................................................. 5 00 52 13 – CONTRACT .................................................. ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS .............................................. ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS .............................. ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. ARTICLE 1. DEFINED TERMS ........................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ............................. Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 3. PRECONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION COMMUNICATION ..................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 4. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: COPIES & MAINTENANCE.... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 5. EXAMINATION OF DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND SITE OF WORK .................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 6. MOBILIZATION ............................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 7. EXISTENCE OF UTILITIES AT THE WORK SITE ........ Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 8. SOILS INVESTIGATIONS ............................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 9. CONTRACTOR’S SUPERVISION ................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 10. WORKERS .................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS ................. Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 12. SUBCONTRACTS ......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 13. VERIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY ....... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 14. REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTION ............... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 15. SHOP DRAWINGS ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 16. SUBMITTALS ................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 17. MATERIALS .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 18. PERMITS AND LICENSES ............................ Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 19. TRENCHES ................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 20. TRAFFIC CONTROL ..................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 21. DIVERSION OF RECYCLABLE WASTE MATERIALS Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 22. REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 23. SANITARY FACILITIES ................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 24. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ......................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 25. LAYOUT AND FIELD ENGINEERING ........... Error! Bookmark not defined. Page 480 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page BBK (01/2026) -ii- TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE 26. TESTS AND INSPECTIONS ......................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 27. PROTECTION OF WORK AND PROPERTY Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 28. CONTRACTOR’S MEANS AND METHODS . Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 29. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES ............ Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 30. HOURS OF WORK........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 31. PAYROLL RECORDS; LABOR COMPLIANCE ........... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 32. PREVAILING RATES OF WAGES ................ Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 33. PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION .... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 34. EMPLOYMENT OF APPRENTICES .............. Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 35. NONDISCRIMINATION/EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ....... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 36. DEBARMENT OF CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS ......... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 37. LABOR/EMPLOYMENT SAFETY .................. Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 38. INSURANCE ................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 39. FORM AND PROOF OF CARRIAGE OF INSURANCE ...... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 40. TIME FOR COMPLETION AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES . Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 41. COST BREAKDOWN AND PERIODIC ESTIMATES ... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 42. PROGRESS ESTIMATES AND PAYMENT ... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 43. SECURITIES FOR MONEY WITHHELD ....... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 44. CHANGES AND EXTRA WORK. ................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 45. FINAL ACCEPTANCE AND PAYMENT ......... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 46. OCCUPANCY................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 47. INDEMNIFICATION ....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 48. PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING DISPUTES ............. Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 49. CITY’S RIGHT TO TERMINATE CONTRACT ............. Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 50. WARRANTY AND GUARANTEE OF WORK . Error! Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE 51. DOCUMENT RETENTION & EXAMINATION Error! Bookmark not defined. Page 481 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page BBK (01/2026) -iii- TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE 52. SEPARATE CONTRACTS ........................................................................... 6 ARTICLE 53. NOTICE AND SERVICE THEREOF ........................................................... 81 ARTICLE 54. NOTICE OF THIRD PARTY CLAIMS ......................................................... 81 ARTICLE 55. STATE LICENSE BOARD NOTICE ............................................................ 81 ARTICLE 56. INTEGRATION ........................................................................................... 81 ARTICLE 57. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT ................................................................. 81 ARTICLE 58. CHANGE IN NAME AND NATURE OF CONTRACTOR’S LEGAL ENTITY 82 ARTICLE 59. ASSIGNMENT OF ANTITRUST ACTIONS ................................................ 82 ARTICLE 60. PROHIBITED INTERESTS ......................................................................... 82 ARTICLE 61. CONTROLLING LAW ................................................................................. 82 ARTICLE 62. JURISDICTION; VENUE ............................................................................ 82 ARTICLE 63. LAWS AND REGULATIONS ...................................................................... 82 ARTICLE 64. PATENTS ................................................................................................... 83 ARTICLE 65. OWNERSHIP OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ........................................... 83 ARTICLE 66. NOTICE OF TAXABLE POSSESSORY INTEREST ................................... 83 ARTICLE 67. SURVIVAL OF OBLIGATIONS ................................................................... 83 00 73 13 – SPECIAL CONDITIONS .......................................................................................... 84 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................. 89 EXHIBIT “A” CHANGE ORDER FORM .................................................................................. - 1 - Page 482 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -4- 00 11 16–NOTICE INVITING BIDS Page 483 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -5- 00 41 43 – BID FORMS 00 41 43 – BID FORMS Page 484 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -6- 00 41 43 – BID FORMS 1.6 Iran Contracting Act Certification. (Public Contract Code section 2200 et seq.) As required by California Public Contract Code Section 2204, the Contractor certifies subject to penalty for perjury that the option checked below relating to the Contractor’s status in regard to the Iran Contracting Act of 2010 (Public Contract Code Section 2200 et seq.) is true and correct: The Contractor is not: (1) identified on the current list of person and entities engaged in investment activities in Iran prepared by the California Department of General Services in accordance with subdivision (b) of Public Contract Code Section 2203; or (2) a financial instruction that extends, for 45 days or more, credit in the amount of $20,000,000 or more to any other person or entity identified on the current list of persons and entities engaging in investment activities in Iran prepared by the California Department of General Services in accordance with subdivision (b) of Public Contract Code Section 2203, if that person or entity uses or will use the credit to provide goods or services in the energy sector in Iran. The City has exempted the Contractor from the requirements of the Iran Contracting Act of 2010 after making a public finding that, absent the exemption, the City will be unable to obtain the goods and/or services to be provided pursuant to the Contract. The amount of the Contract payable to the Contractor for the Project does not exceed $1,000,000. Signature: Printed Name: Title: Firm Name: Date: Note: In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 2205, false certification of this form shall be reported to the California Attorney General and may result in civil penalties equal to the greater of $250,000 or twice the Contract amount, termination of the Contract and/or ineligibility to bid on contracts for three years. Page 485 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -7- 00 41 43 – BID FORMS 1.7 Public Works Contractor Registration Certification Pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, all contractors and subcontractors that wish to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, or enter into a contract to perform public work must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. See http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public- Works/PublicWorks.html for additional information. No bid will be accepted nor any contract entered into without proof of t he contractor’s and subcontractors’ current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations to perform public work. Bidder hereby certifies that it is aware of the registration requirements set forth in Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 and is currently registered as a contractor with the Department of Industrial Relations.1 Name of Bidder: DIR Registration Number: DIR Registration Expiration:_________________________ Small Project Exemption: _____ Yes or _____ No Unless Bidder is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption, Bidder further acknowledges: 1. Bidder shall maintain a current DIR registration for the duration of the project. 2. Bidder shall include the requirements of Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 in its contract with subcontractors and ensure that all subcontractors are registered at the time of bid opening and maintain registration status for the duration of the project. 3. Failure to submit this form or comply with any of the above requirements may result in a finding that the bid is non-responsive. Name of Bidder Signature Name and Title Dated 1 If the Project is exempt from the contractor registration requirements pursuant to the small project exemption under Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, please mark “Yes” in response to “Small Project Exemption.” Page 486 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -8- 00 41 43 – BID FORMS 1.8 Contractor’s Certificate Regarding Workers’ Compensation. I am aware of the provisions of section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self -insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. Name of Bidder Signature Name Title Dated ______________________________ Page 487 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -9- 00 41 43 – BID FORMS 1.9 Fleet Compliance Certification. Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board’s policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the “Regulation”). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder’s fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) (“Fleet”) is true and correct:  The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto.  The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto.  Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third party correspondence or vendor bids).  The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4).  The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto. Name of Bidder:_________________________________________________ Signature: __________________________________________________ Name: __________________________________________________ Title: __________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ Page 488 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -10- 00 52 13 – CONTRACT 00 52 13 – CONTRACT This CONTRACT, No. ________ is made and entered into this ____ day of _______, ______, by and between City of Hermosa Beach, sometimes hereinafter called “City,” and _______________________________________________, sometimes hereinafter called “Contractor.” WITNESSETH: That the parties hereto have mutually covenanted and agreed, and by these presents do covenant and agree with each other as follows: a. SCOPE OF WORK. The Contractor shall perform all Work within the time stipulated in the Contract, and shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, tools, utility services, and transportation to complete all of the Work required in strict compliance with the Contract Documents as specified in Section (e), below, for the following Project: CIP 619 Kelly Courts Improvements The Contractor and its surety shall be liable to the City for any damages arising as a result of the Contractor’s failure to comply with this obligation. b. TIME FOR COMPLETION. Time is of the essence in the performance of the Work. The Work shall be commenced on the date stated in the City’s Notice to Proceed. The Contractor shall complete all Work required by the Contract Documents within 14 calendar days from the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. By its signature hereunder, Contractor agrees the time for completion set forth above is adequate and reasonable to complete the Work. c. CONTRACT PRICE. The City shall pay to the Contractor as full compensation for the performance of the Contract, subject to any additions or deductions as provided in the Contract Documents, and including all applicable taxes and costs, the sum of ____________________________________________________________________ Dollars ($_________________________________). Payment shall be made as set forth in the General Conditions. d. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. In accordance with Government Code section 53069.85, it is agreed that the Contractor will pay the City the sum set forth in Section 00 73 13, Article 1.11 for each and every calendar day of delay beyond the time prescribed in the Contract Documents for finishing the Work, as Liquidated Damages and not as a penalty or forfeiture. In the event this is not paid, the Contractor agrees the City may deduct that amount from any money due or that may become due the Contractor under the Contract. This Article does not exclude recovery of other damages specified in the Contract Documents. e. COMPONENT PARTS OF THE CONTRACT. The “Contract Documents” include the following: Designation of Subcontractors Iran Contracting Act Certification Public Works Contractor Registration Certification Fleet Compliance Certification Performance Bond Page 489 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -11- 00 52 13 – CONTRACT Payment (Labor and Materials) Bond General Conditions Special Conditions Technical Specifications Addenda Plans and Drawings Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction “Greenbook”, latest edition, Except Sections 1-9 Applicable Local Agency Standards and Specifications, as last revised Approved and fully executed change orders Any other documents contained in or incorporated into the Contract The Contractor shall complete the Work in strict accordance with all of the Contract Documents. All of the Contract Documents are intended to be complementary. Work required by one of the Contract Documents and not by others shall be done as if required by all. This Contract shall supersede any prior agreement of the parties. f. PROVISIONS REQUIRED BY LAW AND CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE. Each and every provision of law required to be included in these Contract Documents shall be deemed to be included in these Contract Documents. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, the provisions of the California Labor Code and California Public Contract Code which are applicable to this Work. g. INDEMNIFICATION. Contractor shall provide indemnification and defense as set forth in the General Conditions. h. PREVAILING WAGES. Contractor shall be required to pay the prevailing rate of wages in accordance with the Labor Code which such rates shall be made available at the City’s Administrative Office or may be obtained online at http://www.dir.ca.gov and which must be posted at the job site. [REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK] Page 490 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -12- 00 52 13 – CONTRACT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Contract has been duly executed by the above-named parties, on the day and year above written. City of Hermosa Beach Approved By: Steve Napolitano City Manager Date Attested By: City Clerk Approved As To Form: City Legal Counsel [INSERT CONTRACTOR NAME] Signature Name Title Date (CONTRACTOR’S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED AND CORPORATE SEAL AFFIXED, IF APPLICABLE) END OF CONTRACT Page 491 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -13- 00 52 13 – CONTRACT Notary Acknowledgment A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ______________ On , 20___, before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual Corporate Officer Title(s) Title or Type of Document Partner(s) Limited General Number of Pages Attorney-In-Fact Trustee(s) Guardian/Conservator Date of Document Other: Signer is representing: Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies) Signer(s) Other Than Named Above Page 492 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -14- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS 1.1 Performance Bond. KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach, (hereinafter referred to as “City”) has awarded to _________________________, (hereinafter referred to as the “Contractor”) an agreement for Contract No._________, (hereinafter referred to as the “Project”). WHEREAS, the work to be performed by the Contractor is more particularly set forth in the Contract Documents for the Project dated ________________, (hereinafter referred to as “Contract Documents”), the terms and conditions of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is required by said Contract Documents to perform the terms thereof and to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said Contract Documents. NOW, THEREFORE, we, ______________________, the undersigned Contractor and ________________________________________________ as Surety, a corporation organized and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the sum of ___________________________ DOLLARS, ($____________), said sum being not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the total amount of the Contract, for which amount well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, if the Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and agreements in the Contract Documents and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on its part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their intent and meaning; and shall faithfully fulfill all obligations including the one (1) year guarantee of all materials and workmanship; and shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, and authorized volunteers, as stipulated in said Contract Documents, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. As a condition precedent to the satisfactory completion of the Contract Documents, unless otherwise provided for in the Contract Documents, the above obligation shall hold good for a period of one (1) year after the acceptance of the work by City, during which time if Contractor shall fail to make full, complete, and satisfactory repair and replacements and totally protect the City from loss or damage resulting from or caused by defective materials or faulty workmanship. The obligations of Surety hereunder shall continue so long as any obligation of Contractor remains. Nothing herein shall limit the City’s rights or the Contractor or Surety’s obligations under Page 493 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -15- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS the Contract, law or equity, including, but not limited to, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 337.15. Whenever Contractor shall be, and is declared by the City to be, in default under the Contract Documents, the Surety shall remedy the default pursuant to the Contract Documents, or shall promptly, at the City’s option: i. Take over and complete the Project in accordance with all terms and conditions in the Contract Documents; or ii. Obtain a bid or bids for completing the Project in accordance with all terms and conditions in the Contract Documents and upon determination by Surety of the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, arrange for a Contract between such bidder, the Surety and the City, and make available as work progresses sufficient funds to pay the cost of completion of the Project, less the balance of the contract price, including other costs and damages for which Surety may be liable. The term “balance of the contract price” as used in this paragraph shall mean the total amount payable to Contractor by the City under the Contract and any modification thereto, less any amount previously paid by the City to the Contractor and any other set offs pursuant to the Contract Documents. iii. Permit the City to complete the Project in any manner consistent with California law and make available as work progresses sufficient funds to pay the cost of completion of the Project, less the balance of the contract price, including other costs and damages for which Surety may be liable. The term “balance of the contract price” as used in this paragraph shall mean the total amount payable to Contractor by the City under the Contract and any modification thereto, less any amount previously paid by the City to the Contractor and any other set offs pursuant to the Contract Documents. Surety expressly agrees that the City may reject any contractor or subcontractor which may be proposed by Surety in fulfillment of its obligations in the event of default by the Contractor. Surety shall not utilize Contractor in completing the Project nor shall Surety accept a bid from Contractor for completion of the Project if the City, when declaring the Contractor in default, notifies Surety of the City’s objection to Contractor’s further participation in the completion of the Project. The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract Documents or to the Project to be performed thereunder shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract Documents or to the Project. By their signatures hereunder, Surety and Contractor hereby confirm under penalty of perjury that surety is an admitted surety insurer authorized to do business in the State of California. [REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK] Page 494 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -16- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this _______ day of ______________, 20___. (Corporate Seal) Contractor/ Principal By Title (Corporate Seal) Surety By Attorney-in-Fact (Attach Attorney-in-Fact Certificate) Title The rate of premium on this bond is ____________ per thousand. The total amount of premium charges is $_______________________________. (The above must be filled in by corporate attorney.) THIS IS A REQUIRED FORM Any claims under this bond may be addressed to: (Name and Address of Surety) ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ (Name and Address of Agent or ___________________________________________ Representative for service of ___________________________________________ process in California, if different ___________________________________________ from above) (Telephone number of Surety ___________________________________________ and Agent or Representative for service of process in California) Page 495 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -17- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS Notary Acknowledgment A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ______________ On , 20___, before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual Corporate Officer Title(s) Title or Type of Document Partner(s) Limited General Number of Pages Attorney-In-Fact Trustee(s) Guardian/Conservator Date of Document Other: Signer is representing: Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies) Signer(s) Other Than Named Above NOTE: This acknowledgment is to be completed for Contractor/Principal. Page 496 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -18- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS Notary Acknowledgment A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ______________ On , 20___, before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual Corporate Officer Title(s) Title or Type of Document Partner(s) Limited General Number of Pages Attorney-In-Fact Trustee(s) Guardian/Conservator Date of Document Other: Signer is representing: Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies) Signer(s) Other Than Named Above NOTE: This acknowledgment is to be completed for the Attorney-in-Fact. The Power-of Attorney to local representatives of the bonding company must also be attached. Page 497 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -19- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS END OF PERFORMANCE BOND Page 498 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -20- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS 1.2 Payment Bond (Labor and Materials). KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS That WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach (hereinafter designated as the “City”), by action taken or a resolution passed ___________________ , 20_____, has awarded to ________________________ hereinafter designated as the “Principal,” a contract for the work described as follows: Contract No.____________ (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, said Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection with said contract; providing that if said Principal or any of its Subcontractors shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, provender, equipment, or other supplies used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor done thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of said Principal and its Subcontractors with respect to such work or labor the Surety on this bond will pay for the same to the extent hereinafter set forth. NOW THEREFORE, we, the Principal and __________________________ as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the penal sum of ______________ Dollars ($___________) lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH that if said Principal, his or its subcontractors, heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall fail to pay any of the persons named in Civil Code Section 9100, fail to pay for any materials, provisions or other supplies, used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind, or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed under the contract, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department or Franchise Tax Board from the wages of employees of the contractor and his subcontractors pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 18663, with respect to such work and labor the Surety or Sureties will pay for the same, in an amount not exceeding the sum herein above specified, and also, in case suit is brought upon this bond, all litigation expenses incurred by the City in such suit, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, court costs, expert witness fees and investigation expenses. This bond shall inure to the benefit of any of the persons named in Civil Code Section 9100 so as to give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. It is further stipulated and agreed that the Surety on this bond shall not be exonerated or released from the obligation of this bond by any change, extension of time for performance, addition, alteration or modification in, to, or of any contract, plans, specifications, or agreement pertaining or relating to any scheme or work of improvement herein above described, or pertaining or relating to the furnishing of labor, materials, or equipment therefore, nor by any change or modification of any terms of payment or extension of the time for any payment pertaining or relating to any scheme or work of improvement herein above described, nor by any rescission or attempted rescission or attempted rescission of the contract, agreement or bond, nor by any conditions precedent or subsequent in the bond attempting to limit the right of recovery of claimants Page 499 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -21- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS otherwise entitled to recover under any such contract or agreement or under the bond, nor by any fraud practiced by any person other than the claimant seeking to recover on the bond and that this bond be construed most strongly against the Surety and in favor of all persons for whose benefit such bond is given, and under no circumstances shall Surety be released from liability to those for whose benefit such bond has been given, by reason of any breach of contract between the owner or City and original contractor or on the part of any obligee named in such bond, but the sole conditions of recovery shall be that claimant is a person described in Civil Code Section 9100, and has not been paid the full amount of his claim and that Surety does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, addition, alteration or modification herein mentioned, including but not limited to the provisions of sections 2819 and 2845 of the California Civil Code. By their signatures hereunder, Surety and Principal hereby confirm under penalty of perjury that surety is an admitted surety insurer authorized to do business in the State of California. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this _______ day of ______________, 20__. (Corporate Seal) Contractor/ Principal By Title (Corporate Seal) Surety By Attorney-in-Fact (Attach Attorney-in-Fact Certificate) Title Page 500 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -22- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS Notary Acknowledgment A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ______________ On , 20___, before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual Corporate Officer Title(s) Title or Type of Document Partner(s) Limited General Number of Pages Attorney-In-Fact Trustee(s) Guardian/Conservator Date of Document Other: Signer is representing: Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies) Signer(s) Other Than Named Above NOTE: This acknowledgment is to be completed for Contractor/Principal. Page 501 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -23- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS Notary Acknowledgment A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ______________ On , 20___, before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual Corporate Officer Title(s) Title or Type of Document Partner(s) Limited General Number of Pages Attorney-In-Fact Trustee(s) Guardian/Conservator Date of Document Other: Signer is representing: Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies) Signer(s) Other Than Named Above NOTE: This acknowledgment is to be completed for the Attorney-in-Fact. The Power-of-Attorney to local representatives of the bonding company must also be attached. Page 502 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -24- 00 61 13 – BOND FORMS END OF PAYMENT BOND Page 503 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -25- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS ARTICLE 1. DEFINED TERMS Whenever used in the Contract Documents and printed with initial capital letters, the terms listed below will have the meanings indicated which are applicable to both the singular and plural thereof. In addition to terms specifically defined below, terms with initial capital letters in the Contract Documents include references to identified articles and paragraphs, and the titles of other documents or forms. A. Act of God – An earthquake of magnitude of 3.5 or higher on the Richter scale or a tidal wave. B. Addenda -- Written or graphic instruments issued prior to the submission of Bids which clarify, correct, or change the Contract Documents. C. Additional Work -- New or unforeseen work will be classified as “Additional Work” when the City’s Representative determines that it is not covered by the Contract. D. Applicable Laws -- The laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, codes, regulations, permits, and licenses of any kind, issued by local, state or federal governmental authorities or private authorities with jurisdiction (including utilities), to the extent they apply to the Work. E. Bid -- N/A. F. Bidder -- Contractor. G. Change Order (“CO”) -- A document that authorizes an addition, deletion, or revision in the Work or an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Times, issued on or after the Effective Date of the Contract, in accordance with the Contract Documents and in the form contained in the Contract Documents. H. Change Order Request (“COR”) -- A request made by the Contractor for an adjustment in the Contract Price and/or Contract Times as the result of a Contractor -claimed change to the Work. This term may also be referred to as a Change Order Proposal (“COP”), or Request for Change (“RFC”). I. City -- The City of Hermosa Beach. J. City’s Representative -- The individual or entity as identified in the Special Conditions to act as the City’s Representative. K. Claim -- A demand or assertion by the City or Contractor seeking an adjustment of Contract Price or Contract Times, or both, or other relief with respect to the terms of the Contract. A demand for money or services by a third party is not a Claim. L. Contract -- The entire integrated written agreement between the City and Contractor concerning the Work. “Contract” may be used interchangeably with “Agreement” in the Page 504 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -26- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS Contract Documents. The Contract supersedes prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, whether written or oral, and includes all Contract Documents. M. Contract Documents -- The documents listed in Section 00 52 13, Article 5. Some documents provided by the City to the Bidders and Contractor, including but not limited to reports and drawings of subsurface and physical conditions are not Contract Documents. N. Contract Price -- Amount to be paid by the City to the Contractor as full compensation for the performance of the Contract and completion of the Work, subject to any additions or deductions as provided in the Contract Documents, and including all applicable taxes and costs. O. Contract Times -- The number of days or the dates stated in the Contract Documents to: achieve defined Milestones, if any; and to complete the Work so that it is ready for final payment. P. Contractor -- The individual or entity with which the City has contracted for performance of the Work. Q. Contractor’s Designated On-Site Representative -- The Contractor’s Designated On- Site Representative will be as identified in Section 00 72 13, Article 3 and shall not be changed without prior written consent of the City. R. Daily Rate -- The Daily Rate stipulated in the Contract Documents as full compensation to the Contractor due to the City’s unreasonable delay to the Project that was not contemplated by the parties. S. Day -- A calendar day of 24 hours measured from midnight to the next midnight. T. Defective Work -- Work that is unsatisfactory, faulty, or deficient; or that does not conform to the Contract Documents; or that does not meet the requirements of any inspection, reference standard, test, or approval referenced in the Contract Documents. U. Demobilization -- The complete dismantling and removal by the Contractor of all of the Contractor’s temporary facilities, equipment, and personnel at the Site. V. Drawings -- That part of the Contract Documents prepared by of the Engineer of Record which graphically shows the scope, extent, and character of the Work to be performed by Contractor. Shop Drawings and other Contractor submittals are not Drawings as so defined. W. Effective Date of the Contract -- The date indicated in the Contract on which it becomes effective, but if no such date is indicated, it means the date on which the Contract is signed and delivered by the last of the two parties to sign and deliver. X. Engineer, whenever not qualified, shall mean the [**INSERT TITLE**] of the City, acting either directly or through properly authorized agents, such agents acting Page 505 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -27- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS severally within the scope of the particular duties entrusted to them. On all questions concerning the acceptance of materials, machinery, the classifications of material, the execution of work, conflicting interest of the contractors performing related work and the determination of costs, the decision of the Engineer, duly authorized by the City, shall be binding and final upon both parties. Y. Engineer of Record -- The individual, partnership, corporation, joint venture, or other legal entity named as such in Section 00 73 13, Article 1.1. or any succeeding entity designated by the City. Z. Green Book -- The current edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. AA. Hazardous Waste -- The term “Hazardous Waste” shall have the meaning provided in Section 104 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. § 6903) as amended from time to time or, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code, that is required to be removed to a class I, class II, or class III disposal site in acc ordance with provisions of existing law, whichever is more restrictive. BB. Holiday – The Holidays occur on: New Year’s Day - January 1 President’s Day – Third Monday in February Memorial Day - Last Monday in May Independence Day - July 4 Labor Day - First Monday in September Veteran’s Day - November 11 Thanksgiving Day - Fourth Thursday in November Friday after Thanksgiving Christmas Eve – December 24 Christmas Day - December 25 Day After Christmas – December 26 New Year’s Eve – December 31 If any Holiday listed above falls on a Saturday, Saturday and the preceding Friday are both Holidays. If the Holiday should fall on a Sunday, Sunday and the following Monday are both Holidays. CC. Notice of Award -- The written notice by the City to the Successful Bidder stating that upon timely compliance by the Successful Bidder with the conditions precedent listed therein, the City will sign and deliver the Contract. DD. Notice of Completion -- The form which may be executed by the City and recorded by the county where the Project is located constituting final acceptance of the Project. EE. Notice to Proceed -- A written notice given by the City to Contractor fixing the date on which the Contractor may proceed with the Work and when Contract Times will commence to run. Page 506 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -28- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS FF. Project -- The total construction of which the Work to be performed under the Contract Documents may be the whole, or a part. GG. Recyclable Waste Materials -- Materials removed from the Site which are required to be diverted to a recycling center rather than an area landfill. Recyclable Waste Materials include asphalt, concrete, brick, concrete block, and rock. HH. Schedule of Submittals -- A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, of required submittals and the time requirements to facilitate scheduled performance of related construction activities. II. Shop Drawings -- All drawings, diagrams, illustrations, schedules, and other data or information which are specifically prepared or assembled by or for Contractor and submitted by Contractor to illustrate some portion of the Work. JJ. Specifications -- That part of the Contract Documents consisting of written requirements for materials, equipment, systems, standards and workmanship as applied to the Work, and certain administrative requirements and procedural matters applicable thereto. KK. Stop Payment Notice -- A written notice as defined in Civil Code section 8044. LL. Subcontractor -- An individual or entity other than a Contractor having a contract with any other entity than the City for performance of any portion of the Work at the Site. MM. Submittal -- Written and graphic information and physical samples prepared and supplied by the Contractor demonstrating various portions of the Work. NN. Successful Bidder -- Contractor. OO. Supplier -- A manufacturer, fabricator, supplier, distributor, material man, or vendor having a direct contract with Contractor or with any Subcontractor to furnish materials or equipment used in the performance of the Work or to be incorporated in the Work. PP. Underground Facilities -- All underground pipelines, conduits, ducts, cables, wires, manholes, vaults, tanks, tunnels, or other such facilities or attachments, and any encasements containing such facilities, including those that convey electricity, gases, steam, liquid petroleum products, telephone or other communications, cable television, water, wastewater, storm water, other liquids or chemicals, or traffic or other control systems. QQ. Unit Price Work -- Work to be paid for on the basis of unit prices as provided by the Contractor in its bid or as adjusted in accordance with the Contract Documents. RR. Warranty -- A written guarantee provided to the City by the Contractor that the Work will remain free of defects and suitable for its intended use for the period required by the Contract Documents or the longest period permitted by the law of this State, whichever is longer. Page 507 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -29- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS SS. Work -- The entire construction or the various separately identifiable parts thereof required to be provided under the Contract Documents. Work includes and is the result of performing or providing all labor, services, and documentation necessary to produce such construction, and furnishing, installing, and incorporating all materials and equipment into such construction, all as required by the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS A. Contract Documents. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by one shall be as binding as if called for by all. B. Interpretations. The Contract Documents are intended to be fully cooperative and complementary. If the Contractor observes that any documents are in conflict, the Contractor shall promptly notify the Engineer in writing. In case of conflicts between the Contract Documents, the order of precedence shall be as follows: 1. Change Orders 2. Addenda 3. Special Conditions 4. Technical Specifications 5. Plans (Contract Drawings) 6. Contract 7. General Conditions 8. Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Sections 1-9 Excluded) 9. Applicable Local Agency Standards and Specifications 10. Standard Drawings 11. Reference Documents With reference to the Drawings, the order of precedence shall be as follows: 1. Figures govern over scaled dimensions 2. Detail drawings govern over general drawings 3. Addenda or Change Order drawings govern over Contract Drawings 4. Contract Drawings govern over Standard Drawings 5. Contract Drawings govern over Shop Drawings C. Conflicts in Contract Documents. Notwithstanding the orders of precedence established above, in the event of conflicts, the higher standard, higher quality, and most expensive shall always apply. D. Organization of Contract Documents. Organization of the Contract Documents into divisions, sections, and articles, and arrangement of drawings shall not control the Contractor in dividing Project Work among subcontractors or in establishing the extent of Work to be performed by any trade. ARTICLE 3. PRECONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION COMMUNICATION Before any Work at the site is started, a conference attended by the City, Contractor, City’s Representative, and others as appropriate will be held to establish a working understanding Page 508 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -30- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS among the parties as to the Work and to discuss the schedules referred to herein, procedures for handling Shop Drawings and other submittals, processing Applications for Payment, and maintaining required records. At this conference the City and Contractor each shall designate, in writing, a specific individual to act as its authorized representative with respect to the services and responsibilities under the Contract. Such individuals shall have the authority to transmit instructions, receive information, render decisions relative to the Contract, and otherwise act on behalf of each respective party. ARTICLE 4. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: COPIES & MAINTENANCE Contractor will be furnished, free of charge, five (5) copies of the Contract Documents. Additional copies may be obtained at cost of reproduction. Contractor shall maintain a clean, undamaged set of Contract Documents, including submittals, at the Project site. ARTICLE 5. EXAMINATION OF DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND SITE OF WORK A. Examination of Contract Documents. Before commencing any portion of the Work, Contractor shall again carefully examine all applicable Contract Documents, the Project site, and other information given to Contractor as to materials and methods of construction and other Project requirements. Contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of any potential error, inconsistency, ambiguity, conflict, or lack of detail or explanation. If Contractor performs, permits, or causes the performance of any Work which is in error, inconsistent or ambiguous, or not sufficiently detailed or explained, Contractor shall bear any and all resulting costs, including, without limitation, the cost of correction. In no case shall the Contractor or any subcontractor proceed with Work if uncertain as to the applicable requirements. B. Additional Instructions. After notification of any error, inconsistency, ambiguity, conflict, or lack of detail or explanation, the Engineer will provide any required additional instructions, by means of drawings or other written direction, necessary for proper execution of Work. C. Quality of Parts, Construction and Finish. All parts of the Work shall be of the best quality of their respective kinds and the Contractor must use all diligence to inform itself fully as to the required construction and finish. D. Contractor’s Variation from Contract Document Requirements. If it is found that the Contractor has varied from the requirements of the Contract Documents including the requirement to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, the Engineer may at any time, before or after completion of the Work, order the improper Work removed, remade or replaced by the Contractor at the Contractor’s expense. Page 509 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -31- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS ARTICLE 6. MOBILIZATION A. Payment for Initial Mobilization will be deemed to be included in the other items of the Work. B. The scope of the Work included under Initial Mobilization shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following principal items: 1. Obtaining and paying for all bonds, insurance, and permits. 2. Moving on to the Project site of all Contractor’s plant and equipment required for the first month’s operations. 3. Installing temporary construction power, wiring, and lighting facilities, as applicable. 4. Establishing fire protection system, as applicable. 5. Developing and installing a construction water supply, if applicable. 6. Providing and maintaining the field office trailers for the Contractor, if necessary, and the Engineer (if specified), complete, with all specified f urnishings and utility services. 7. Providing on-site sanitary facilities and potable water facilities as specified per Cal- OSHA and these Contract Documents. 8. Furnishing, installing, and maintaining all storage buildings or sheds required for temporary storage of products, equipment, or materials that have not yet been installed in the Work. All such storage shall meet manufacturer’s specified storage requirements, and the specific provisions of the specifications, including temperature and humidity control, if recommended by the manufacturer, and for all security. 9. Arranging for and erection of Contractor’s work and storage yard. 10. Posting all OSHA required notices and establishment of safety programs per Cal- OSHA. 11. Full-time presence of Contractor’s superintendent at the job site as required herein. 12. Submittal of Construction Schedule as required by the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 7. EXISTENCE OF UTILITIES AT THE WORK SITE A. The City has endeavored to determine the existence of utilities at the Project site from the records of the owners of known utilities in the vicinity of the Project. The positions of these utilities as derived from such records are shown on the Plans. Page 510 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -32- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS B. Unless indicated otherwise on the Plans and Specifications, no excavations were made to verify the locations shown for underground utilities. The service connections to these utilities are not shown on the Plans. Water service connections may be shown on the Plans showing general locations of such connections. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to determine the exact location of all service connections. The Contractor shall make its own investigations, including exploratory excavations, to determine the locations and type of service connections, prior to commencing Work which could result in damage to such utilities. The Contractor shall immediately notify the City in writing of any utility discovered in a different position than shown on the Plans or which is not shown on the Plans. C. If applicable, all water meters, water valves, fire hydrants, electrical utility vaults, telephone vaults, gas utility valves, and other subsurface structures shall be relocated or adjusted to final grade by the Contractor. Locations of existing utilities shown on the Plans are approximate and may not be complete. The Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating its Work with all utility companies during the construction of the Work. D. Notwithstanding the above, pursuant to section 4215 of the Government Code, the City has the responsibility to identify, with reasonable accuracy, main or trunkline facilities on the plans and specifications. In the event that main or trunkline utility facilities are not identified with reasonable accuracy in the plans and specifications made a part of the invitation for Bids, the City shall assume the responsibility for their timely removal, relocation, or protection. E. Contractor, except in an emergency, shall contact the appropriate regional notification center, California Underground Service Alert at 811 or 1-800-227-2600 or on-line at www.digalert.org at least two working days prior to commencing any excavation if the excavation will be performed in an area which is known, or reasonably should be known, to contain subsurface installations other than the underground facilities owned or operated by the City, and obtain an inquiry identification number from that notification center. No excavation shall be commenced or carried out by the Contractor unless such an inquiry identification number has been assigned to the Contractor or any subcontractor of the Contractor and the City has been given the identification number by the Contractor. ARTICLE 8. SOILS INVESTIGATIONS A. Reports and Drawings. The Special Conditions identify: 1. those reports known to the City of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the site; and 2. those drawings known to the City of physical conditions relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at the site (except Underground Facilities). B. Limited Reliance by Contractor on Technical Data Authorized. Contractor may rely upon the accuracy of the “technical data” contained in such reports and drawings, which were expressly not created or obtained to evaluate or assist in the evaluation of constructability, and are not Contract Documents. Contractor shall make its own Page 511 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -33- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS interpretation of the “technical data” and shall be solely responsible for any such interpretations. Except for reliance on the accuracy of such “technical data,” Contractor may not rely upon or make any claim against the City, City’s Representative, or Engineer of Record, or any of their officers, directors, members, partners, employees, agents, consultants, or subcontractors, with respect to: 1. the completeness of such reports and drawings for Contractor’s purposes, including without limitation any aspects of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto; or 2. other data, interpretations, opinions, conclusions and information contained in such reports or shown or indicated in such drawings; or 3. any Contractor interpretation of or conclusion drawn from any “technical data” or any such other data, interpretations, opinions, or information. ARTICLE 9. CONTRACTOR’S SUPERVISION Contractor shall continuously keep at the Project site, a competent and experienced full-time Project superintendent acceptable to the City. Superintendent must be able to proficiently speak, read and write in English and shall have the authority to make decisions on behalf of the Contractor. Contractor shall continuously provide efficient supervision of the Project. ARTICLE 10. WORKERS A. Contractor shall at all times enforce strict discipline and good order among its employees. Contractor shall not employ on the Project any unfit person or any one not skilled in the Work assigned to him or her. B. Any person in the employ of the Contractor whom the City may deem incompetent or unfit shall be dismissed from the W ork and shall not be employed on this Project. ARTICLE 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS Contractor shall be an independent contractor for the City and not an employee. Contractor understands and agrees that it and all of its employees shall not be considered officers, employees, or agents of City and are not entitled to benefits of any kind normally provided employees of City, including but not limited to, state unemployment compensation or workers’ compensation. Contractor assumes full responsibility for the acts and omissions of its employees or agents related to the Work. ARTICLE 12. SUBCONTRACTS A. Contractor agrees to bind every subcontractor to the terms of the Contract Documents as far as such terms are applicable to subcontractor’s portion of the Work. Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by its subcontractors, as Contractor is for acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Contractor. Page 512 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -34- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS Nothing contained in these Contract Documents shall create any contractual relationship between any subcontractor and the City. B. The City reserves the right to accept all subcontractors. The City’s acceptance of any subcontractor under this Contract shall not in any way relieve Contractor of its obligations in the Contract Documents. C. Prior to substituting any subcontractor listed in the Bid Forms, Contractor must comply with the requirements of the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act pursuant to California Public Contract Code section 4100 et seq. ARTICLE 13. VERIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY By executing this Contract, Contractor verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time, and shall require all subcontractors, sub-subcontractors and consultants to comply with the same. Each person executing this Contract on behalf of Contractor verifies that he or she is a duly authorized officer of Contractor and that any of the following shall be grounds for the City to terminate the Contract for cause: (1) failure of the Contractor or its subcontractors, sub-subcontractors or consultants to meet any of the requirements provided f or in this Article; (2) any misrepresentation or material omission concerning compliance with such requirements; or (3) failure to immediately remove from the Work any person found not to be in compliance with such requirements. ARTICLE 14. REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTION A. For the purposes of this provision, the term “substitution” shall mean the substitution of any material, method or service substantially equal to or better in every respect to that indicated in the Standard Specifications or otherwise referenced herein. B. Pursuant to Public Contract Code section 3400(b), the City may make a finding that is described in the Notice Inviting Bids that designates certain products, things, or services by specific brand or trade name. C. Unless specifically designated in the Special Conditions, whenever any material, process, or article is indicated or specified by grade, patent, or proprietary name or by name of manufacturer, such specifications shall be deemed to be used for the purpose of facilitating the description of the material, process, or article desired and shall be deemed to be followed by the words “or equal.” Contractor may, unless otherwise stated, offer for substitution any material, process, or article which may be substantially equal to or better in every respect to that so indicated or specified in the Contract Documents. However, the City has adopted uniform standards for certain materials, processes, and articles. D. The Contractor shall submit substitution requests, together with substantiating data, for substitution of any “or equal” material, process, or article no later than thirty-five (35) calendar days after award of Contract. Provisions regarding submission of substitution requests shall not in any way authorize an extension of time for the Page 513 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -35- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS performance of this Contract. If a substitution request is rejected by the City, the Contractor shall provide the material, method or service specified herein. The City shall not be responsible for any costs incurred by the Contractor associated with substitution requests. The burden of proof as to the equality of any material, process, or article shall rest with the Contractor. The Engineer has the complete and sole discretion to determine if a material, process, or article is substantially equal to or better than that specified and to approve or reject all substitution requests. E. Substantiating data as described above shall include, at a minimum, the following information: 1. A signed affidavit from the Contractor stating that the material, process, or article proposed as a substitution is substantially equal to or better than that specified in every way except as may be listed on the affidavit. 2. Illustrations, specifications, catalog cut sheets, and any other relevant data required to prove that the material, process, or article is substantially equal to or better than that specified. 3. A statement of the cost implications of the substitution being requested, indicating whether and why the proposed substitution will reduce or increase the amount of the contract. 4. Information detailing the durability and lifecycle costs of the proposed substitution. F. Failure to submit all the required substantiating data detailed above in a timely manner so that the substitution request can be adequately reviewed may result in rejection of the substitution request. The Engineer is not obligated to review multiple submittals related the same substitution request resulting from the Contractor’s failure to initially submit a complete package. G. Time limitations within this Article shall be strictly complied with and in no case will an extension of time for completion of the contract be granted because of Contractor’s failure to provide substitution requests at the time and in the manner described herein. H. The Contractor shall bear the costs of all City work associated with the review of substitution requests. I. If substitution requests approved by the Engineer require that Contractor furnish materials, methods or services more expensive than that specified, the increased costs shall be borne by Contractor. ARTICLE 15. SHOP DRAWINGS A. Contractor shall check and verify all field measurements and shall submit with such promptness as to provide adequate time for review and cause no delay in its own W ork or in that of any other contractor, subcontractor, or worker on the Project, six (6) copies of all shop drawings, calculations, schedules, and materials list, and all other provisions required by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall sign all submittals Page 514 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -36- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS affirming that submittals have been reviewed and approved by Contractor prior to submission to Engineer. Each signed submittal shall affirm that the submittal meets all the requirements of the Contract Documents except as specifically and clearly noted and listed on the transmittal letter of the submittal. B. Contractor shall make any corrections required by the Engineer, and file with the Engineer six (6) corrected copies each, and furnish such other copies as may be needed for completion of the Work. Engineer’s acceptance of shop drawings shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for deviations from the Contract Documents unless Contractor has, in writing, called Engineer’s attention to such deviations at time of submission and has secured the Engineer’s written acceptance. Engineer’s acceptance of shop drawings shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for errors in shop drawings. ARTICLE 16. SUBMITTALS A. Contractor shall furnish to the Engineer for approval, prior to purchasing or commencing any Work, a log of all samples, material lists and certifications, mix designs, schedules, and other submittals, as required in the Contract Documents. The log shall indicate whether samples will be provided in accordance with other provisions of this Contract. B. Contractor will provide samples and submittals, together with catalogs and supporting data required by the Engineer, to the Engineer within a reasonable time period to provide for adequate review and avoid delays in the W ork. C. These requirements shall not authorize any extension of time for performance of this Contract. Engineer will check and approve such samples, but only for conformance with design concept of work and for compliance with information given in the Contract Documents. Work shall be in accordance with approved samples and submittals. ARTICLE 17. MATERIALS A. Except as otherwise specifically stated in the Contract Documents, Contractor shall provide and pay for all materials, labor, tools, equipment, lights, power, transportation, superintendence, temporary constructions of every nature, and all other services and facilities of every nature whatsoever necessary to execute and complete this Contract within specified time. B. Unless otherwise specified, all materials shall be new and the best of their respective kinds and grades as noted and/or specified, and workmanship shall be of good quality. C. Materials shall be furnished in ample quantities and at such times as to ensure uninterrupted progress of the Work and shall be stored properly and protected as required by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall be entirely responsible for damage or loss by weather or other causes to materials or W ork. D. No materials, supplies, or equipment for W ork under this Contract shall be purchased subject to any chattel mortgage or under a conditional sale or other agreement by Page 515 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -37- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS which an interest therein or in any part thereof is retained by the seller or supplier. Contractor warrants good title to all material, supplies, and equipment installed or incorporated in the Work and agrees upon completion of all work to deliver the Project, to the City free from any claims, liens, or charges. E. Materials shall be stored on the Project site in such manner so as not to interfere with any operations of the City or any independent contractor. F. Contractor shall verify all measurements, dimensions, elevations, and quantities before ordering any materials or performing any Work, and the City shall not be liable for Contractor’s failure to so. No additional compensation, over and above payment for the actual quantities at the prices set out in the Bid Form, will be allowed because of differences between actual measurements, dimension, elevations and quantities and those indicated on the Plans and in the Specifications. Any difference therein shall be submitted to the Engineer for consideration before proceeding with the Work. ARTICLE 18. PERMITS AND LICENSES A. City will apply and pay for the review of necessary encroachment permits for Work within the public rights-of-way. Contractor shall obtain all other necessary permits and licenses for the construction of the Project, including encroachment permits, and shall pay all fees required by law and shall comply with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations relating to the Work and to the preservation of public health and safety. Before acceptance of the Project, the Contractor shall submit all licenses, permits, certificates of inspection and required approvals to the City. B. The Contract contains an allowance for the Contractor’s cost of acquiring traffic control permits and for construction inspection fees that may be charged to the Contractor by the Agency of Jurisdiction. The allowance is included within the Contract to eliminate the need to research or estimate the costs of traffic control permits and construction inspection fees prior to Contract. The allowance is specifically intended to account for the costs of traffic control permits and construction inspection fees charged by the local Agency of Jurisdiction only. No other costs payable by Contractor to the Agency of Jurisdiction are included within the allowance. Payment by City to Contractor under the Permit and Inspection Allowance shall be made based on actual cost receipts only and in accordance with the provisions of these specifications. ARTICLE 19. TRENCHES A. Trenches Five Feet or More in Depth. Contractor shall submit to the Engineer at the preconstruction meeting, a detailed plan showing the design of shoring, bracing, sloping or other provisions to be made for worker protection from hazards of caving ground during the excavation of any trench or trenches five feet or more in depth. If such plan varies from shoring system standards established by the Construction Safety Orders of the California Code of Regulations, Department of Industrial Relations, the plan shall be prepared by a California registered civil or structural engineer. The plan shall not be less effective than the shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions of the Construction Safety Orders, as defined in the California Code of Regulations. The Contractor shall designate in writing the “competent person” as Page 516 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -38- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS defined in Title 8, California Code of Regulations, who shall be present at the Work Site each day that trenching/excavation is in progress. The “competent person” shall prepare and provide daily trenching/excavation inspection reports to the Engineer. Contractor shall also submit a copy of its annual California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) trench/excavation permit. B. Excavations Deeper than Four Feet. If the Work involves excavating trenches or other excavations that extend deeper than four feet below the surface, Contractor shall promptly, and before the excavation is further disturbed, notify the City in writing of any of the following conditions: 1. Material that the Contractor believes may be material that is hazardous waste, as defined in section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code, that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II, or Class III disposal site in accordance with provisions of existing law. 2. Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated. 3. Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Contract The City shall promptly investigate the conditions, and if it finds that the conditions do so materially differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and cause a decrease or increase in Contractor’s cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the Work, shall issue a change order under the procedures described in the Contract Documents. In the event that a dispute arises between the City and the Contractor as to whether the conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or increase in the Contractor’s cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the Work, the Contractor shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date provided for by the Contract, but shall proceed with all Work to be performed under the Contract. Contractor shall retain any and all rights provided either by contract or by law which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the parties. ARTICLE 20. TRAFFIC CONTROL A. Traffic control plan(s) for the Work may be required by the Agency(s) of Jurisdiction. Traffic control plans, if required, shall be prepared at Contractor’s expense, and traffic control shall be performed at Contractor’s expense in accordance with the requirements of the Agency(s) of Jurisdiction. The Permit and Inspection Allowance included within the Bid Form includes the cost of required traffic control permit(s) and construction inspection by the Agency(s) of Jurisdiction only. The Permit and Inspection Allowance does not include costs for preparation of any required traffic control plans, implementation of any traffic control requirements or for any traffic signal services that may be required. Costs for traffic control plans, implementation of traffic control, or traffic signal services required by the Agency(s) of Jurisdiction shall be included in the Contractor’s Bid. Page 517 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -39- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS B. All warning signs and safety devices used by the Contractor to perform the Work shall conform to the requirements contained in the State of California, Department of Transportation’s current edition of “Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones” or to the requirements of the local agency. The Contractor shall also be responsible for all traffic control required by the agency having jurisdiction over the project on the intersecting streets. Contractor must submit a traffic control plan to the agency having jurisdiction over the project for approval prior to starting work. C. The Contractor’s representative on the site responsible for traffic control shall produce evidence that he/she has completed training acceptable to the California Department of Transportation for safety through construction zones. All of the streets in which the Work will occur shall remain open to traffic and one lane of traffic maintained at all times unless otherwise directed by the agency of jurisdiction. Businesses and residences adjacent to the Work shall be notified forty-eight (48) hours in advance of closing of driveways. The Contractor shall make every effort to minimize the amount of public parking temporarily eliminated due to construction in areas fronting businesses. No stockpiles of pipe or other material will be allowed in traveled right-of- ways after working hours unless otherwise approved by the Engineer. ARTICLE 21. DIVERSION OF RECYCLABLE WASTE MATERIALS In compliance with the applicable City’s waste reduction and recycling efforts, Contractor shall divert all Recyclable Waste Materials to appropriate recycling centers as required for compliance with the local jurisdiction’s waste diversion ordinances. Contractor will be required to submit weight tickets and written proof of diversion with its monthly progress payment requests. Contractor shall complete and execute any certification forms required by City or other applicable agencies to document Contractor’s compliance with these diversion requirements. All costs incurred for these waste diversion efforts shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. ARTICLE 22. REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Should Contractor encounter material reasonably believed to be polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) or other toxic wastes and hazardous materials which have not been rendered harmless at the Project site, the Contractor shall immediately stop work at the affected Project site and shall report the condition to the City in writing. The City shall contract for any services required to directly remove and/or abate PCBs and other toxic wastes and hazardous materials, if required by the Project site(s), and shall not require the Contractor to subcontract for such services. The Work in the affected area shall not thereafter be resumed except by written agreement of the City and Contractor. ARTICLE 23. SANITARY FACILITIES Contractor shall provide sanitary temporary toilet buildings and hand washing facilities for the use of all workers. All toilets and hand washing facilities shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations. Toilets shall be kept supplied with toilet paper and shall have workable door fasteners. Toilets and hand washing facilities shall be serviced no less than once weekly and shall be present in a quantity of not less than 1 per 20 workers as required by Cal/OSHA regulations. The toilets and hand washing facilities shall be maintained in Page 518 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -40- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS a sanitary condition at all times. Use of toilet and hand washing facilities in the Work under construction shall not be permitted. Any other Sanitary Facilities required by Cal/OSHA shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. ARTICLE 24. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL Contractor shall comply with all air pollution control rules, regulations, ordinances and statutes. All containers of paint, thinner, curing compound, solvent or liquid asphalt shall be labeled to indicate that the contents fully comply with the applicable material requirements. ARTICLE 25. LAYOUT AND FIELD ENGINEERING All field engineering required for laying out the Work and establishing grades for earthwork operations shall be furnished by the Contractor at its expense. ARTICLE 26. TESTS AND INSPECTIONS A. If the Contract Documents, the Engineer, or any instructions, laws, ordinances, or public authority requires any part of the W ork to be tested or Approved, Contractor shall provide the Engineer at least two (2) working days’ notice of its readiness for observation or inspection. If inspection is by a public authority other than the City, Contractor shall promptly inform the City of the date fixed for such inspection. Required certificates of inspection (or similar) shall be secured by Contractor. Costs for City testing and City inspection shall be paid by the City. Costs of tests for Work found not to be in compliance shall be paid by the Contractor. B. If any W ork is done or covered up without the required testing or approval, the Contractor shall uncover or deconstruct the Work, and the Work shall be redone after completion of the testing at the Contractor’s cost in compliance with the Contract Documents. C. Where inspection and testing are to be conducted by an independent laboratory or agency, materials or samples of materials to be inspected or tested shall be selected by such laboratory or agency, or by the City, and not by Contractor. All tests or inspections of materials shall be made in accordance with the commonly recognized standards of national organizations. D. In advance of manufacture of materials to be supplied by Contractor which must be tested or inspected, Contractor shall notify the City so that the City may arrange for testing at the source of supply. Any materials which have not satisfactorily passed such testing and inspection shall not be incorporated into the W ork. E. If the manufacture of materials to be inspected or tested will occur in a plant or location greater than sixty (60) miles from the City, the Contractor shall pay for any excessive or unusual costs associated with such testing or inspection, including but not limited to excessive travel time, standby time and required lodging. F. Reexamination of Work may be ordered by the City. If so ordered, Work must be uncovered or deconstructed by Contractor. If Work is found to be in accordance with Page 519 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -41- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS the Contract Documents, the City shall pay the costs of reexamination and reconstruction. If such work is found not to be in accordance with the Contract Documents, Contractor shall pay all costs. ARTICLE 27. PROTECTION OF WORK AND PROPERTY A. The Contractor shall be responsible for all damages to persons or property that occurs as a result of the W ork. Contractor shall be responsible for the proper care and protection of all materials delivered and W ork performed until completion and final Acceptance by the City. All W ork shall be solely at the Contractor’s risk. Contractor shall adequately protect adjacent property from settlement or loss of lateral support as necessary. Contractor shall comply with all applicable safety laws and building codes to prevent accidents or injury to persons on, about, or adjacent to the Project site where Work is being performed. Contractor shall erect and properly maintain at all times, as required by field conditions and progress of work, all necessary safeguards, signs, barriers, lights, and watchmen for protection of workers and the public, and shall post danger signs warning against hazards created in the course of construction. B. In an emergency affecting safety of life or of work or of adjoining property, Contractor, without special instruction or authorization from the Engineer, is hereby permitted to act to prevent such threatened loss or injury; and Contractor shall so act, without appeal, if so authorized or instructed by the Engineer or the City. Any compensation claimed by Contractor on account of emergency work shall be determined by and agreed upon by the City and the Contractor. ARTICLE 28. CONTRACTOR’S MEANS AND METHODS Contractor is solely responsible for the means and methods utilized to perform the Work. In no case shall the Contractor’s means and methods deviate from commonly used industry standards. ARTICLE 29. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES The City shall designate representatives, who shall have the right to be present at the Project site at all times. The City may designate an inspector who shall have the right to observe all of the Contractor’s Work. The inspector shall not be responsible for the Contractor’s failure to carry out the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Contractor shall provide safe and proper facilities for such access. ARTICLE 30. HOURS OF WORK A. As provided in Article 3 (commencing at section 1810), Chapter 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the Labor Code, Contractor stipulates that eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day’s work. The time of service of any worker employed at any time by the Contractor or by any subcontractor on any subcontract under this Contract upon the Work or upon any part of the Work contemplated by this Contract is limited and restricted to eight (8) hours during any one calendar day and 40 hours during any one calendar week, except as hereinafter provided. Notwithstanding the provisions herein above set forth, work performed by employees of Contractor in excess of eight (8) hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week, shall be permitted upon this public Page 520 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -42- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours per day at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay. B. The Contractor and every subcontractor shall keep an accurate record showing the name of and actual hours worked each calendar day and each calendar week by each worker employed in connection with the Work or any part of the Work contemplated by this Contract. The record shall be kept open at all reasonable hours to the inspection of the City and to the Division of Labor Law Enforcement, Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California. C. The Contractor shall pay to the City a penalty of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each worker employed in the execution of this Contract by the Contractor or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Article 3 (commencing at section 1810), Chapter 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the Labor Code. D. Any work necessary to be performed after regular working hours, or on Saturdays and Sundays or other holidays, shall be performed without additional expense to the City. E. City will provide inspection during normal working hours from 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspection before or after this time will be charged to the Contractor as reimbursable inspection time. Inspections on weekends requires two days’ notice for review and approval. Upon written request and approval the 8.5 hour working day may be changed to other limits subject to city/county ordinance. F. It shall be unlawful for any person to operate, permit, use, or cause to operate any of the following at the Project site, other than between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, with no Work allowed on the City-observed holidays, unless otherwise approved by the City: 1. Powered Vehicles 2. Construction Equipment 3. Loading and Unloading Vehicles 4. Domestic Power Tools ARTICLE 31. PAYROLL RECORDS; LABOR COMPLIANCE A. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1776, Contractor and all subcontractors shall maintain weekly certified payroll records, showing the names, addresses, Social Security numbers, work classifications, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by them in connection with the Work under this Contract. Contractor shall certify under penalty of perjury that records maintained and submitted by Contractor are true and accurate. Contractor shall also require subcontractor(s) to certify weekly payroll records under penalty of perjury. Page 521 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -43- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS B. In accordance with Labor Code section 1771.4, the Contractor and each subcontractor shall furnish the certified payroll records directly to the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) on the specified interval and format prescribed by the DIR, which may include electronic submission. Contractor shall comply with all requirements and regulations from the DIR relating to labor compliance monitoring and enforcement. The requirement to submit certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Section 1771.4. C. Any stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Contractor or any subcontractor that affect Contractor’s performance of Work, including any delay, shall be Contractor’s sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered Contractor caused delay subject to any applicable liquidated damages and shall not be compensable by the City. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Contractor or any subcontractor. D. The payroll records described herein shall be certified and submitted by the Contractor at a time designated by the City. The Contractor shall also provide the following: 1. A certified copy of the employee’s payroll records shall be made available for inspection or furnished to such employee or his or her authorized representative on request. 2. A certified copy of all payroll records described herein shall be made available for inspection or furnished upon request of the DIR. E. Unless submitted electronically, the certified payroll records shall be on forms provided by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (“DLSE”) of the DIR or sh all contain the same information as the forms provided by the DLSE. F. Any copy of records made available for inspection as copies and furnished upon request to the public or any public agency, the City, the Division of Apprenticeship Standards or the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement shall be marked or obliterated in such a manner as to prevent disclosure of an individual's name, address and social security number. The name and address of the Contractor awarded the Contract or performing the contract shall not be marked or obliterated. G. In the event of noncompliance with the requirements of this Article, the Contractor shall have ten (10) calendar days in which to comply subsequent to receipt of written notice specifying in what respects the Contractor must comply with this Article. Should noncompliance still be evident after such 10-day period, the Contractor shall pay a penalty of one hundred dollars ($100.00) to the City for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker, until strict compliance is effectuated. Upon the request of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards or the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, such penalties shall be withheld from progress payment then due. Page 522 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -44- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS H. The responsibility for compliance with this Article shall rest upon the Contractor. ARTICLE 32. PREVAILING RATES OF WAGES A. The Contractor is aware of the requirements of Labor Code sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects. Since this Project involves an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and since the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The Contractor shall obtain a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages at the commencement of this Contract from the website of the Division of Labor Statistics and Research of the Department of Industrial Relations located at www.dir.ca.gov. In the alternative, the Contractor may view a copy of the prevailing rate of per diem wages which are on file at the City’s Administration Office and shall be made available to interested parties upon request. Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform work on the Project available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor’s principal place of business and at the Project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and authorized volunteers free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or allege failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. B. The Contractor shall forfeit as a penalty to the City not more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00), pursuant to Labor Code section 1775, for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing wage rate as determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations for such work or craft in which such worker is employed for any public work done under the Contract by it or by any subcontractor under it. The difference between such prevailing wage rate and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day or portion thereof, for which each worker was paid less than the prevailing wage rate, shall be paid to each worker by the Contractor. C. Contractor shall post, at appropriate conspicuous points on the Project site, a schedule showing all determined general prevailing wage rates and all authorized deductions, if any, from unpaid wages actually earned. ARTICLE 33. PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION Pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Contractor and its subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations prior to the execution of a contract to perform public works. By entering into this Contract, Contractor represents that it is aware of the registration requirement and is currently registered with the DIR. Contractor shall maintain a current registration for the duration of the Project. Contractor shall further include the requirements of Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 in any subcontract and ensure that all subcontractors are registered at the time this Contract is entered into and maintain registration for the duration of the Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work Page 523 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -45- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1. ARTICLE 34. EMPLOYMENT OF APPRENTICES A. Contractor and all subcontractors shall comply with the requirements of Labor Code sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. B. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. C. Knowing violations of Labor Code section 1777.5 will result in forfeiture not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100.00) for each calendar day of non-compliance pursuant to Labor Code section 1777.7. D. The responsibility for compliance with this Article shall rest upon the Contractor. ARTICLE 35. NONDISCRIMINATION/EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Pursuant to Labor Code section 1735 and other applicable provisions of law, the Contractor and its subcontractors shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, or any other classifications protected by law on this Project. The Contractor will take affirmative action to insure that employees are treated during employment or training without regard to their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, or any other classifications protected by law. Employment Eligibility; Contractor. By executing this Contract, Contractor verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time. Such requirements and restrictions include, but are not limited to, examination and retention of documentation confirming the identity and immigration status of each employee of the Contractor. Contractor also verifies that it has not committed a violation of any such law within the five (5) years immediately preceding the date of execution of this Contract, and shall not violate any such law at any time during the term of the Contract. Contractor shall avoid any violation of any such law during the term of this Contract by participating in an electronic verification of work authorization program operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security, by participating in an equivalent federal work authorization program operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security to verify information of newly hired employees, or by some other legally acceptable method. Contractor shall maintain records of each such verification, and shall make them available to the City or its representatives for inspection and copy at any time during normal business hours. The City shall not be responsible for any costs or expenses related to Contractor’s compliance with the requirements provided for or referred to herein. Page 524 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -46- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS Employment Eligibility; Subcontractors, Sub-subcontractors and Consultants. To the same extent and under the same conditions as Contractor, Contractor shall require all of its subcontractors, sub-subcontractors and consultants performing any part of the Work or of this Contract to make the same verifications and comply with all requirements and restrictions provided for herein. Employment Eligibility; Failure to Comply. Each person executing this Contract on behalf of Contractor verifies that he or she is a duly authorized officer of Contractor, and understands that any of the following shall be grounds for the City to terminate the Contract for cause: (1) failure of Contractor or its subcontractors, sub-subcontractors or consultants to meet any of the requirements provided for herein; (2) any misrepresentation or material omission concerning compliance with such requirements; or (3) failure to immediately remove from the Work any person found not to be in compliance with such requirements. ARTICLE 36. DEBARMENT OF CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS Contractors or subcontractors may not perform work on a public works project with a subcontractor who is ineligible to perform work on a public project pursuant to Labor Code section 1777.1 or 1777.7. Any contract on a public works project entered into between a contractor and a debarred subcontractor is void as a matter of law. A debarred subcontractor may not receive any public money for performing work as a subcontractor on a public works contract. Any public money that is paid, or may have been paid to a debarred subcontractor by a contractor on the project shall be returned to the City. The Contractor shall be responsible for the payment of wages to workers of a debarred subcontractor who has been allowed to work on the project. ARTICLE 37. LABOR/EMPLOYMENT SAFETY The Contractor shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations of the federal, state, and local government, including Cal/OSHA requirements and requirements for verification of employees’ legal right to work in the United States. The Contractor shall maintain emergency first aid treatment for his employees which complies with the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. § 651 et seq.), and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Industrial Relations Division 1, Department of Industrial Relations, Chapter 4. The Contractor shall ensure the availability of emergency medical services for its employees in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1512. The Contractor shall submit the Illness and Injury Prevention Program and a Project site specific safety program to the City prior to beginning Work at the Project site. Contractor shall maintain a confined space program that meets or exceeds the City Standards. Contractor shall adhere to the City’s lock out tag out program. ARTICLE 38. INSURANCE [**CITY’S RISK MANAGER TO REVIEW COVERAGE AND LIMITS**] The Contractor shall obtain, and at all times during performance of the Work of Contract, maintain all of the insurance described in this Article. Contractor shall not commence Work under this Contract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required hereunder. Contractor shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any Page 525 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -47- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subcontractor has secured all insurance required under this Article. Failure to provide and maintain all required insurance shall be grounds for the City to terminate this Contract for cause. Contractor shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effective coverage required by this Contract on forms satisfactory to the City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, and shall be on forms acceptable to the City. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the City before Work commences. A. Additional Insureds; Waiver of Subrogation. The City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and authorized volunteers shall be named as Additional Insureds on Contractor’s All Risk policy and on Contractor’s and its subcontractors’ policies of Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance using, for Contractor’s policy/ies of Commercial General Liability insurance, ISO CG forms 20 10 and 20 37 (or endorsements providing the exact same coverage, including completed operations), and, for subcontractors’ policies of Commercial General Liability insurance, ISO CG form 20 38 (or endorsements providing the exact same coverage). Notwithstanding the minimum limits set forth in this Contract for any type of insurance coverage, all available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of coverage shall be available to the parties required to be named as Additional Insureds hereunder. Contractor and its insurance carriers shall provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of those parties. B. Workers’ Compensation Insurance. The Contractor shall provide workers’ compensation insurance for all of the employees engaged in Work under this Contract, on or at the Site, and, in case of any sublet Work, the Contractor shall require the subcontractor similarly to provide workers’ compensation insurance for all the latter’s employees as prescribed by State law. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employers’ Liability insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.Any class of employee or employees not covered by a subcontractor’s insurance shall be covered by the Contractor’s insurance. In case any class of employees engaged in work under this Contract, on or at the Site, is not protected under the Workers’ Compensation Statutes, the Contractor shall provide or shall cause a subcontractor to provide, adequate insurance coverage for the protection of such employees not otherwise protected. The Contractor is required to secure payment of compensation to his employees in accordance with the provisions of section 3700 of the Labor Code. The Contractor shall file with the City certificates of his insurance protecting workers. Company or companies providing insurance coverage shall be acceptable to the City, if in the form and coverage as set forth in the Contract Documents. C. Employer’s Liability Insurance. Contractor shall provide Employer’s Liability Insurance, including Occupational Disease, in the amount of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per person per accident. Contractor shall provide City with a certificate of Employer’s Liability Insurance. Such insurance shall comply with the provisions of the Contract Documents. The policy shall be endorsed, if applicable, to provide a Borrowed Servant/Alternate Employer Endorsement and contain a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City. Page 526 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -48- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS D. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Contractor shall provide “occurrence” form Commercial General Liability insurance coverage at least as broad as the most current ISO CGL Form 00 01, including but not limited to, premises liability, contractual liability, products/completed operations, personal and advertising injury which may arise from or out of Contractor’s operations, use, and management of the Site, or the performance of its obligations hereunder. The policy shall not contain any exclusion contrary to this Contract including but not limited to endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability (including but not limited to ISO CG 24 26 or 21 39); or (2) cross-liability for claims or suits against one insured against another. Policy limits shall not be less than $5,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits. 1. Such policy shall comply with all the requirements of this Article. The limits set forth herein shall apply separately to each insured against whom claims are made or suits are brought, except with respect to the limits of liability. Further the limits set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve the Contractor from liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it limit Contractor’s indemnification obligations to the City, and shall not preclude the City from taking such other actions available to the City under other provisions of the Contract Documents or law. 2. All general liability policies provided pursuant to the provisions of this Article shall comply with the provisions of the Contract Documents. 3. All general liability policies shall be written to apply to all bodily injury, including death, property damage, personal injury, owned and non-owned equipment, blanket contractual liability, completed operations liability, explosion, collapse, under-ground excavation, removal of lateral support, and other covered loss, however occasioned, occurring during the policy term, and shall specifically insure the performance by Contractor of that part of the indemnification contained in these General Conditions relating to liability for injury to or death of persons and damage to property. 4. If the coverage contains one or more aggregate limits, a minimum of 50% of any such aggregate limit must remain available at all times; if over 50% of any aggregate limit has been paid or reserved, the City may require additional coverage to be purchased by Contractor to restore the required limits. Contractor may combine primary, umbrella, and as broad as possible excess liability coverage to achieve the total limits indicated above. Any umbrella or excess liability policy shall include the additional insured endorsement described in the Contract Documents. 5. All policies of general liability insurance shall permit and Contractor does hereby waive any right of subrogation which any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss. Page 527 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -49- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS E. Automobile Liability Insurance. Contractor shall provide “occurrence” form Automobile Liability Insurance at least as broad as ISO CA 00 01 (Any Auto) in the amount of, at least, one million dollars ($5,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Such insurance shall provide coverage with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor or for which Contractor is responsible, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. All policies of automobile insurance shall permit and Contractor does hereby waive any right of subrogation which any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss. F. Builder’s Risk [“All Risk”] 1. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to maintain or cause to be maintained Builder’s Risk [“All Risk”] extended coverage insurance on all work, material, equipment, appliances, tools, and structures that are or will become part of the Work and subject to loss or damage by fire, and vandalism and malicious mischief, in an amount to cover 100% of the replacement cost. The City accepts no responsibility for the Work until the Work is formally accepted by the City. The Contractor shall provide a certificate evidencing this coverage before commencing performance of the Work. 2. The named insureds shall be Contractor, all Subcontractors of any tier (excluding those solely responsible for design work), suppliers, and City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and authorized volunteers, as their interests may appear. Contractor shall not be required to maintain property insurance for any portion of the Work following acceptance by City. 3. Policy shall be provided for replacement value on an “all risk” basis. There shall be no coinsurance penalty provision in any such policy. Policy must include: (1) coverage for any ensuing loss from faulty workmanship, nonconforming work, omission or deficiency in design or specifications; (2) coverage against machinery accidents and operational testing; (3) coverage for removal of debris, and insuring the buildings, structures, machinery, equipment, materials, facilities, fixtures and all other properties constituting a part of the Project; (4) transit coverage, including ocean marine coverage (unless insured by the supplier), with sub-limits sufficient to insure the full replacement value of any key equipment item; and (5) coverage with sub-limits sufficient to insure the full replacement value of any property or equipment stored either on or off the Site. Such insurance shall be on a form acceptable to City to ensure adequacy and sublimit. 4. In addition, the policy shall meet the following requirements: a. Insurance policies shall be so conditioned as to cover the performance of any extra work performed under the Contract. b. Coverage shall include all materials stored on site and in transit. c. Coverage shall include Contractor’s tools and equipment. Page 528 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -50- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS d. Insurance shall include boiler, machinery and material hoist coverage. G. Contractor’s Pollution Liability Coverage. Contractor shall provide pollution liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate. H. Contractor shall require all tiers of sub-contractors working under this Contract to provide the insurance required under this Article unless otherwise agreed to in writing by City. Contractor shall make certain that any and all subcontractors hired by Contractor are insured in accordance with this Contract. If any subcontractor’s coverage does not comply with the foregoing provisions, Contractor shall indemnify and hold the City harmless from any damage, loss, cost, or expense, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the City as a result thereof. ARTICLE 39. FORM AND PROOF OF CARRIAGE OF INSURANCE A. Any insurance carrier providing insurance coverage required by the Contract Documents shall be admitted to and authorized to do business in the State of California unless waived, in writing, by the City’s Risk Manager. Carrier(s) shall have an A.M. Best rating of not less than an A:VII. Insurance deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared by the Contractor. At the election of the City the Contractor shall either 1) reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions, or 2) procure a bond which guarantees payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration, and defense costs and expenses. If umbrella or excess liability coverage is used to meet any required limit(s) specified herein, the Contractor shall provide a “follow form” endorsement satisfactory to the City indicating that such coverage is subject to the same terms and conditions as the underlying liability policy. B. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that: (1) coverage shall not be suspended, voided, reduced or cancelled except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City; and (2) any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers. C. The Certificates(s) and policies of insurance shall contain or shall be endorsed to contain the covenant of the insurance carrier(s) that it shall provide no less than thirty (30) days written notice be given to the City prior to any material modification or cancellation of such insurance. In the event of a material modification or cancellation of coverage, the City may terminate the Contract or stop the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents, unless the City receives, prior to such effective date, another properly executed original Certificate of Insurance and original copies of endorsements or certified original policies, including all endorsements and attachments thereto evidencing coverage’s set forth herein and the insurance required herein is in full force and effect. Contractor shall not take possession, or use the Site, or commence operations under this Contract until the City has been furnished original Certificate(s) of Insurance and certified original copies of endorsements or policies of insurance including all endorsements and any and all other attachments as required in this Article. The original endorsements for each policy and the Certificate of Page 529 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -51- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS Insurance shall be signed by an individual authorized by the insurance carrier to do so on its behalf. D. The Certificate(s) of Insurance, policies and endorsements shall so covenant and shall be construed as primary, and the City’s insurance and/or deductibles and/or self- insured retentions or self-insured programs shall not be construed as contributory. E. City reserves the right to adjust the monetary limits of insurance coverages during the term of this Contract including any extension thereof if, in the City’s reasonable judgment, the amount or type of insurance carried by the Contractor beco mes inadequate. F. Contractor shall report to the City, in addition to the Contractor’s insurer, any and all insurance claims submitted by the Contractor in connection with the Work under this Contract. ARTICLE 40. TIME FOR COMPLETION AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES A. Time for Completion/Liquidated Damages. Time is of the essence in the completion of the Work. Work shall be commenced within ten (10) Days of the date stated in the City’s Notice to Proceed and shall be completed by Contractor in the time specified in the Contract Documents. The City is under no obligation to consider early completion of the Project; and the Contract completion date shall not be amended by the City’s receipt or acceptance of the Contractor’s proposed earlier completion date. Furthermore, Contractor shall not, under any circumstances, receive additional compensation from the City (including but not limited to indirect, general, administrative or other forms of overhead costs) for the period between the time of earlier completion proposed by the Contractor and the Contract completion date. If the Work is not completed as stated in the Contract Documents, it is understood that the City will suffer damage. In accordance with Government Code section 53069.85, being impractical and infeasible to determine the amount of actual damage, it is agreed that Contractor shall pay to the City as fixed and liquidated damages, and not as a penalty, the sum stipulated in the Contract for each calendar day of delay until the Work is fully completed. Contractor and its surety shall be liable for any liquidated damages. Any money due or to become due the Contractor may be retained to cover liquidated damages. B. Inclement Weather. Contractor shall abide by the Engineer’s determination of what constitutes inclement weather. Time extensions for inclement weather shall only be granted when the Work stopped during inclement weather is on the critical path of the Project schedule. C. Extension of Time. Contractor shall not be charged liquidated damages because of any delays in completion of the Work due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Contractor (or its subcontractors or suppliers). Contractor shall within five (5) Days of identifying any such delay notify the City in writing of causes of delay. The City shall ascertain the facts and extent of delay and grant extension of time for completing the Work when, in its judgment, the facts justify such an extension. Time extensions to the Project shall be requested by the Contractor Page 530 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -52- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS as they occur and without delay. No delay claims shall be permitted unless the event or occurrence delays the completion of the Project beyond the Contract completion date. D. No Damages for Reasonable Delay. The City’s liability to Contractor for delays for which the City is responsible shall be limited to only an extension of time unless such delays were unreasonable under the circumstances. In no case shall the City be liable for any costs which are borne by the Contractor in the regular course of business, including, but not limited to, home office overhead and other ongoing costs. Damages caused by unreasonable City delay, including delays caused by items that are the responsibility of the City pursuant to Government Code section 4215, shall be based on actual costs only, no proportions or formulas shall be used to calculate any delay damages. ARTICLE 41. COST BREAKDOWN AND PERIODIC ESTIMATES Contractor shall furnish on forms Approved by the City: A. Within ten (10) Days of Notice to Proceed with the Contract, a detailed estimate giving a complete breakdown of the Contract price, if the Contract amount is a lump sum. B. A monthly itemized estimate of Work done for the purpose of making progress payments. In order for the City to consider and evaluate each progress payment application, the Contractor shall submit a detailed measurement of Work performed and a progress estimate of the value thereof before the tenth (10th) Day of the following month. C. Contractor shall submit, with each of its payment requests, an adjusted list of actual quantities, verified by the Engineer, for unit price items listed, if any, in the Bid Form. D. Following the City’s Acceptance of the Work, the Contractor shall submit to the City a written statement of the final quantities of unit price items for inclusion in the final payment request. E. The City shall have the right to adjust any estimate of quantity and to subsequently correct any error made in any estimate for payment. Contractor shall certify under penalty of perjury, that all cost breakdowns and periodic estimates accurately reflect the Work on the Project. ARTICLE 42. PROGRESS ESTIMATES AND PAYMENT A. By the tenth (10th) Day of the following calendar month, Contractor shall submit to Engineer a payment request which shall set forth in detail the value of the Work done for the period beginning with the date work was first commenced and ending on the end of the calendar month for which the payment request is prepared. Contractor shall include any amount earned for authorized extra work. From the total thus computed, a deduction shall be made in the amount of five percent (5%) for retention, except where the City has adopted a finding that the Work done under the Contract is Page 531 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -53- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS substantially complex, and then the amount withheld as retention shall be the percentage specified in the Notice Inviting Bids. From the remainder a further deduction may be made in accordance with Section B below. The amount computed, less the amount withheld for retention and any amounts withheld as set forth below, shall be the amount of the Contractor’s payment request. B. The City may withhold a sufficient amount or amounts of any payment or payments otherwise due to Contractor, as in his judgment may be necessary to cover: 1. Payments which may be past due and payable for just claims against Contractor or any subcontractors for labor or materials furnished in and about the performance of work on the Project under this Contract. 2. Defective work not remedied. 3. Failure of Contractor to make proper payments to his subcontractor or for material or labor. 4. Completion of the Contract if there is a reasonable doubt that the Work can be completed for balance then unpaid. 5. Damage to another contractor or a third party. 6. Amounts which may be due the City for claims against Contractor. 7. Failure of Contractor to keep the record (“as-built”) drawings up to date. 8. Failure to provide update on construction schedule as required herein. 9. Site cleanup. 10. Failure to comply with Contract Documents. 11. Liquidated damages. 12. Legally permitted penalties. C. The City may apply such withheld amount or amounts to payment of such claims or obligations at its discretion with the exception of subsections (B)(1), (3), and (5) of this Article, which must be retained or applied in accordance with applicable law. In so doing, the City shall be deemed the agent of Contractor and any payment so made by the City shall be considered as a payment made under contract by the City to Contractor and the City shall not be liable to Contractor for such payment s made in good faith. Such payments may be made without prior judicial determination of claim or obligations. The City will render Contractor a proper accounting of such funds disbursed on behalf of Contractor. D. Upon receipt, the Engineer shall review the payment request to determine whether it is undisputed and suitable for payment. If the payment request is determined to be unsuitable for payment, it shall be returned to Contractor as soon as practicable but Page 532 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -54- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS not later than seven (7) Days after receipt, accompanied by a document setting forth in writing the reasons why the payment request is not proper. The City shall make the progress payment within 30 calendar days after the receipt of an undisputed and properly submitted payment request from Contractor, provided that a release of liens and claims has been received from the Contractor pursuant to Civil Code section 8132. The number of days available to the City to make a payment without incurring interest pursuant to this paragraph shall be reduced by the number of days by which the Engineer exceeds the seven (7) Day requirement. E. A payment request shall be considered properly executed if funds are available for payment of the payment request and payment is not delayed due to an audit inquiry by the financial officer of the City. ARTICLE 43. SECURITIES FOR MONEY WITHHELD Pursuant to section 22300 of the Public Contract Code of the State of California, Contractor may request the City to make retention payments directly to an escrow agent or may substitute securities for any money withheld by the City to ensure performance under the contract. At the request and expense of Contractor, securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with the City or with a state or federally chartered bank as the escrow agent who shall return such securities to Contractor upon satisfactory completion of the contract. Deposit of securities with an escrow agent shall be subject to a written agreement substantially in the form provided in section 22300 of the Public Contract Code. ARTICLE 44. CHANGES AND EXTRA WORK. A. Contract Change Orders. 1. The City, without invalidating the Contract, may order changes in the Work consisting of additions, deletions or other revisions, and the Contract Price and Contract Time shall be adjusted accordingly. Except as otherwise provided herein, all such changes in the Work shall be authorized by Change Order, and shall be performed under the applicable conditions of the Contract Documents. A Change Order signed by the Contractor indicates the Contractor's agreement therewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time, and the full and final settlement of all costs (direct, indirect and overhead) related to the Work authorized by the Change Order. 2. Contractor shall promptly execute changes in the Work as directed in writing by the City even when the parties have not reached agreement on whether the change increases the scope of Work or affects the Contract Price or Contract Time. All claims for additional compensation to the Contractor shall be presented in writing. No claim will be considered after the Work in question has been done unless a written Change Order has been issued or a timely written notice of claim has been made by Contractor. 3. Whenever any change is made as provided for herein, such change shall be considered and treated as though originally included in the Contract, and shall be subject to all terms, conditions, and provisions of the original Contract. Page 533 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -55- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS 4. Contractor shall not be entitled to claim or bring suit for damages, whether for loss of profits or otherwise, on account of any decrease or omission of any item or portion of Work to be done. 5. No dispute, disagreement, or failure of the parties to reach agreement on the terms of the Change Order shall relieve the Contractor from the obligation to proceed with performance of the work, including Additional Work, promptly and expeditiously. 6. Contractor shall make available to the City any of the Contractor’s documents related to the Project immediately upon request of the City, as set forth in Article 52. 7. Any alterations, extensions of time, Additional Work, or any other changes may be made without securing consent of the Contractor’s surety or sureties. B. Contract Price Change. 1. Process for Determining Adjustments in Contract Price. a. Owner Initiated Change. The Contractor must submit a complete cost proposal, including any change in the Contract Price or Contract Time, within seven (7) Days after receipt of a scope of a proposed change order initiated by the City, unless the City requests that proposals be submitted in less than seven (7) Days. b. Contractor Initiated Change. The Contractor must give written notice of a proposed change order required for compliance with the Contract Documents within seven (7) Days of discovery of the facts giving rise to the proposed change order. c. Whenever possible, any changes to the Contract amount shall be in a lump sum mutually agreed to by the Contractor and the City. d. Price quotations from the Contractor shall be accompanied by sufficiently detailed supporting documentation to permit verification by the City, including but not limited to estimates and quotations from subcontractors or material suppliers, as the City may reasonably request. Contractor shall certify the accuracy of all Change Order Requests under penalty of perjury. e. If the Contractor fails to submit a complete cost proposal within the se ven (7) Day period (or as requested), the City has the right to order the Contractor in writing to commence the Work immediately on a time and materials basis and/or issue a lump sum change to the Contract Price and/or Contract Time in accordance with the City’s estimate. If the change is issued based on the City's estimate, the Contractor will waive its right to dispute the action unless within fifteen (15) Days following completion of the added/deleted work, the Contractor presents written proof that the City’s estimate was in error. Page 534 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -56- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS 2. Unit Price Change Orders. a. When the actual quantity of a Unit Price item varies from the Bid Form, compensation for the change in quantity will be calculated by multiplying the actual quantity by the Unit Price. This calculation may result in either an additive or deductive Final Change Order pursuant to the Contract Documents. b. No Mark up for Overhead and Profit. Because the Contract Unit Prices provided in the Bid Form include Overhead and Profit as determined by Contractor at the time of Bid submission, no mark up or deduction for Overhead and Profit will be included in Unit Price Change Orders. c. Bid items included on the Bid Form may be deducted from the Work in their entirety without any negotiated extra costs. d. Contractor acknowledges that unit quantities are estimates and agrees that the estimated unit quantities listed on the Bid Form will be adjusted to reflect the actual unit quantities which may result in an adjustment to the Contract Unit Prices. Such an adjustment will be made by execution of a final additive or deductive Change Order following Contractor’s completion of the Work. Upon notification, Contractor’s failure to respond within seven (7) Days will result in City’s issuance of a unit quantity adjustment to the Contract Unit Prices and/or Contract Time in accordance with the Contract Documents. e. The City or Contractor may make a Claim for an adjustment in the Unit Price in accordance with the Contract Documents if: i. the quantity of any item of Unit Price Work performed by Contractor differs by twenty-five percent (25%) or more from the estimated quantity of such item indicated in the Contract; and ii. there is no corresponding adjustment with respect to any other item of Work; and iii. Contractor believes that Contractor is entitled to an increase in Unit Price as a result of having incurred additional expense or the City believes that the City is entitled to a decrease in Unit Price and the parties are unable to agree as to the amount of any such increase or decrease.. 3. Lump Sum Change Orders. Contractor shall incorporate the provisions of this Section into all agreements with Subcontractors. Compensation for Lump Sum Change Orders shall be limited to expenditures necessitated specifically by the Additional Work, and shall be according to the following: a. Overview. The Contractor will submit a properly itemized Lump Sum Change Order Proposal covering the Additional Work and/or the work to be deleted. This proposal will be itemized for the various components of the Additional Work and segregated by labor, material, and equipment in a detailed format satisfactory to the City. The City will require itemized change orders on all Page 535 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -57- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS change order proposals from the Contractor, subcontractors, and sub- subcontractors regardless of tier. Details to be submitted will include detailed line item estimates showing detailed materials quantity take-offs, material prices by item and related labor hour pricing information and extensions (by line item or by drawing as applicable). b. Labor. The costs of labor will be the actual cost for wages prevailing locally for each craft or type of worker at the time the Additional Work is done, plus employer payments of payroll taxes and insurance, health and welfare, pension, vacation, apprenticeship funds, and other direct costs resulting from Federal, State or local laws, as well as assessment or benefits required by lawful collective bargaining agreements. The use of a labor classification which would increase the Additional Work cost will not be permitted unless the Contractor establishes the necessity for such new classifications. Labor costs for equipment operators and helpers shall be reported only when such costs are not included in the invoice for equipment rental. Estimated labor hours must only include hours for those workmen and working foremen directly involved in performing the change order work. Supervision above the level of working foremen (such as general foremen, superintendent, project manager, etc.) is considered to be included in the markup percentages as outlined below. Note that no separate allowances for warranty expense will be allowed as a direct cost of a change order. Costs attributed to warranty expenses will be considered to be covered by the markup. c. Labor Burden. Labor burden allowable in change orders shall be defined as employer's net actual cost of payroll taxes (FICA, Medicare, SUTA, FUTA), net actual cost for employer's cost of union benefits (or other usual and customary fringe benefits if the employees are not union employees), and net actual cost to employer for worker's compensation insurance taking into consideration adjustments for experience modifiers, premium discounts, dividends, rebates, expense constants, assigned risk pool costs, net cost reductions due to policies with deductibles for self -insured losses, assigned risk rebates, etc. Contractor shall reduce their standard payroll tax percentages to properly reflect the effective cost reduction due to the estimated impact of the annual maximum wages subject to payroll taxes. An estimated percentage for labor burden may be used for pricing change orders. However, the percentage used for labor burden to price change orders will be examined at the conclusion of the Project and an adjustment to the approved change orders will be processed if it is determined that the actual labor burden percentage should have been more or less than the estimated percentage used. d. Materials. The cost of materials reported shall be at invoice or lowest current price at which such materials are locally available in the quantities involved, plus sales tax, freight, and delivery. Materials costs shall be based upon supplier or manufacturer’s invoice. If invoices or other satisfactory evidence of cost are not furnished within fifteen (15) Days of delivery, then the City shall determine the materials cost, at its sole discretion. Estimated material change order costs shall reflect the Contractor's reasonably anticipated net actual cost Page 536 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -58- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS for the purchase of the material needed for the change order work. Estimated material costs shall reflect cost reductions available to the Contractor due to “non-cash” discounts, trade discounts, free material credits, and/or volume rebates. “Cash” discounts (i.e., prompt payment discounts of 2% or less) available on material purchased for change order work shall be credited to the City if the Contractor is provided the City funds in time for Contractor to take advantage of any such “cash” discounts. The portion of any “cash” discounts greater than 2% will not be considered “non-cash” discount for purposes of this provision. Price quotations from material suppliers must be itemized with unit prices for each specific item to be purchased. "Lot pricing" quotations will not be considered sufficient substantiating detail. e. Tool and Equipment Use. Costs for the use of small tools, which are tools that have a replacement value of $1,000 or less, shall be considered included in the Overhead and Profit mark-ups established below. Allowable change order estimated costs may include appropriate amounts for rental of major equipment specifically needed to perform the change order work (defined as tools and equipment with an individual purchase cost of more than $750). For Contractor owned equipment, the "bare" equipment rental rates allowed to be used for pricing change order proposals shall be 75% of the monthly rate listed in the most current publication of The AED Green Book divided by 176 to arrive at a maximum hourly rate to be applied to the hours the equipment is used performing the change order work. Further, for Contractor owned equipment, the aggregate equipment rent charges for any single piece of equipment used in all change order work shall be limited to 50% of the fair market value of the piece of equipment when the first change order is priced involving usage of the piece of equipment. Fuel necessary to operate the equipment will be considered as a separate direct cost associated with the change order work. f. Maximum Markup Percentage Allowable on Self-Performed Work. With respect to pricing change orders, the maximum markup percentage to be paid to any Contractor or subcontractor (regardless of tier) on self-performed work shall be a single markup percentage not-to-exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the net direct cost of (1) direct labor and allowable labor burden costs applicable to the change in the Work; (2) the net cost of material and installed equipment incorporated into the change in the Work, and (3) net rental cost of major equipment and related fuel costs necessary to complete the change in the Work. The markup computed using the above formula shall be considered to be allocated 2/3 to cover applicable overhead costs directly attributable to the field overhead costs related to processing, supervising and performing, the change order work, and the remaining 1/3 to cover home office overhead costs and profit g. Maximum Markup Percentages Allowable on Work Performed by Lower Tier Subcontractors. With respect to pricing the portion of change order proposals involving Work performed by lower tier contractors, the maximum markup percentage allowable to the Contractor or subcontractor supervising the lower tier subcontractor's work shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the net of all approved change order work performed by all subcontractors combined for any Page 537 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -59- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS particular change order proposal. The markup computed using the above formula shall be considered to be allocated 2/3 to cover applicable overhead costs directly attributable to the field overhead costs related to processing, supervising and performing the change order work, and the remaining 1/3 to cover home office overhead costs and profit. h. No Markup on Bonds and Liability Insurance Costs. Change order cost adjustments due to increases or decreases in bond or insurance costs (if applicable) shall not be subject to any markup. i. Direct and Indirect Costs Covered by Markup Percentages. As a further clarification, the agreed upon markup percentage set forth above is intended to cover the Contractor's profit and all indirect costs associated with the change order work. Items intended to be covered by the markup percentage include, but are not limited to: home office expenses, branch office and field office overhead expense of any kind, project management, superintendents, general foremen, estimating, engineering, coordinating, expediting, purchasing, detailing, legal, accounting, data processing or other administrative expenses, shop drawings, permits, auto insurance and umbrella insurance, pick -up truck costs, and warranty expense costs. The cost for the use of small tools is also to be considered covered by the markup percentage established above. Small tools shall be defined as tools and equipment (power or non-power) with an individual purchase cost of less than $750. j. Deduct Change Orders and Net Deduct Changes. The application of the markup percentages referenced above will apply to both additive and deductive change orders. In the case of a deductive change order, the credit will be computed by applying the sliding scale percentages as outlined above so that a deductive change order would be computed in the same manner as an additive change order. In those instances where a change involves both additive and deductive work, the additions and deductions will be netted and the markup percentage adjustments will be applied to the net amount. k. Contingency. In no event will any lump sum or percentage amounts for "contingency" be allowed to be added as a separate line item in change order estimates. Unknowns attributable to labor hours will be accounted for when estimating labor hours anticipated performing the work. Unknowns attributable to material scrap and waste will be estimated as part of material costs. l. Insurance and Bonds. In the event the Contractor has been required to furnish insurance and/or bonds as part of the base contract price, a final contract change order will be processed to account for the Contractor's net increase or decrease in insurance costs and/or bond premium costs associated with change orders to Contractor's base Contract Price. 4. Time and Materials Change Orders. a. General. The term Time and Materials means the sum of all costs reasonably and necessarily incurred and paid by Contractor for labor, materials, and Page 538 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -60- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS equipment in the proper performance of Additional Work. Except as otherwise may be agreed to in writing by the City, such costs shall be in amounts no higher than those prevailing in the locality of the Project, and shall include only the following items. b. Timely and Final Documentation. i. T&M Daily Sheets. Contractor must submit timesheets, materials invoices, records of equipment hours, and records of rental equipment hours to the City’s Representative for an approval signature each day Additional Work is performed. Failure to get the City’s Representative’s approval signature each Day shall result in a waiver of Contractor’s right to claim these costs. The City’s Representative’s signature on time sheets only serves as verification that the Work was performed and is not indicative of City’s agreement to Contractor’s entitlement to the cost. ii. T&M Daily Summary Sheets. All documentation of incurred costs (“T&M Daily Summary Sheets”) shall be submitted by Contractor within three (3) Days of incurring the cost for labor, material, equipment, and special services as Additional Work is performed. Contractor’s actual costs shall be presented in a summary table in an electronic spreadsheet file by labor, material, equipment, and special services. Each T&M Daily Summary Sheet shall include Contractor’s actual costs incurred for the Additional Work performed that day and a cumulative total of Contractor’s actual costs incurred for the Additional Work. Contractor’s failure to provide a T&M Daily Summary Sheet showing a total cost summary within three (3) Days but within five (5) Days of performance of the Work will result in the Contractor’s otherwise allowable overhead and profit being reduced by 50% for that portion of Additional Work which was not documented in a timely manner. Contractor’s failure to submit the T&M Daily Summary Sheet within five (5) Days of performance of the Work will result in a total waiver of Contractor’s right to claim these costs. iii. T&M Total Cost Summary Sheet. Contractor shall submit a T&M Total Cost Summary Sheet, which shall include total actual costs, within seven (7) Days following completion of City approved Additional Work. Contractor’s total actual cost shall be presented in a summary table in an electronic spreadsheet file by labor, material, equipment, and special services. Contractor’s failure to submit the T&M Total Cost Summary Sheet within seven (7) Days of completion of the Additional Work will result in Contractor’s waiver for any reimbursement of any costs associated with the T&M Summary Sheets or the performance of the Additional Work. c. Labor. The Contractor will be paid the cost of labor for the workers used in the actual and direct performance of the Work. The cost of labor will be the sum of the actual wages paid (which shall include any employer payments to or on behalf of the workers for health and welfare, pension, vacation, and similar purposes) substantiated by timesheets and certified payroll for wages prevailing for each craft or type of workers performing the Additional Work at Page 539 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -61- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS the time the Additional Work is done, and the labor surcharge set forth in the Department of Transportation publication entitled Labor Surcharge and Equipment Rental Rates, which is in effect on the date upon which the Work is accomplished and which is a part of the Contract. The labor surcharge shall constitute full compensation for all payments imposed by Federal, State, or local laws and for all other payments made to, or on behalf of, the workers, other than actual wages. i. Equipment Operator Exception. Labor costs for equipment operators and helpers shall be paid only when such costs are not included in the invoice for equipment rental. ii. Foreman Exception. The labor costs for foremen shall be proportioned to all of their assigned work and only that applicable to the Additional Work shall be paid. Indirect labor costs, including, without limitation, the superintendent, project manager, and other labor identified in the Contract Documents will be considered Overhead. d. Materials. The cost of materials reported shall be itemized at invoice or lowest current price at which materials are locally available and delivered to the Project site in the quantities involved, plus the cost of sales tax, freight, delivery, and storage. i. Trade discounts available to the purchaser shall be credited to the City notwithstanding the fact that such discounts may not have been taken by Contractor. ii. For materials secured by other than a direct purchase and direct billing to the purchaser, the cost shall be deemed to be the price paid to the actual supplier as determined by the City’s Representative. iii. Payment for materials from sources owned wholly or in part by the purchaser shall not exceed the price paid by the purchaser for similar materials from said sources on Additional Work items or the current wholesale price for such materials delivered to the Project site, whichever price is lower. iv. If, in the opinion of the City’s Representative, the cost of materials is excessive, or Contractor does not furnish satisfactory evidence of the cost of such materials, then the cost shall be deemed to be the lowest current wholesale price for the total quantity concerned delivered to the Project site less trade discounts. v. The City reserves the right to furnish materials for the Additional Work and no Claim shall be allowed by Contractor for costs of such materials or Indirect Costs or profit on City furnished materials. e. Equipment. Page 540 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -62- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS i. Rental Time. The rental time to be paid for equipment on the Project site shall be the time the equipment is in productive operation on the Additional Work being performed and, in addition, shall include the time required to move the equipment to the location of the Additional Work and return it to the original location or to another location requiring no more time than that required to return it to its original location; except that moving time will not be paid if the equipment is used on other than the Additional Work, even though located at the site of the Additional Work. (a) Rental Time Not Allowed. Rental time will not be allowed while equipment is inoperative due to breakdowns. (b) Computation Method. The following shall be used in computing the rental time of equipment on the Project site. (i) When hourly rates are paid, any part of an hour less than 30 minutes of operation shall be considered to be 1/2-hour of operation, and any part of an hour in excess of 30 minutes will be considered one hour of operation. (ii) When daily rates are paid, any part of a day less than 4 hours operation shall be considered to be 1/2-day of operation, and any part of an hour in excess of 4 hours will be considered one day of operation. ii. Rental Rates. Contractor will be paid for the use of equipment at the lesser of (i) the actual rental rate, or (ii) the rental rate listed for that equipment in the California Department of Transportation publication entitled Labor Surcharge and Equipment Rental Rates, which is in effect on the date upon which the Contract was executed. Such rental rates will be used to compute payments for equipment whether the equipment is under Contractor’s control through direct ownership, leasing, renting, or another method of acquisition. The rental rate to be applied for use of each item of equipment shall be the rate (i.e., daily, monthly) resulting in the least total cost to the City for the total period of use. If it is deemed necessary by Contractor to use equipment not listed in the publication, an equitable rental rate for the equipment will be established by the City’s Representative. Contractor may furnish cost data which might assist the City’s Representative in the establishment of the rental rate. iii. Contractor-Owned Equipment. (a) For Contractor-owned equipment, the allowed equipment rental rate will be limited to the monthly equipment rental rate using a utilization rate of 173 hours per month. (b) For Contractor-owned equipment, the rental time to be paid for equipment on the Site shall be the time the equipment is in productive operation, unless, in the instance of standby time, the equipment Page 541 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -63- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS could be actively used by Contractor on another project, then City shall pay for the entirety of the time the equipment is on Site. It shall be Contractor’s burden to demonstrate to the City that the equipment could be actively used on another project. iv. All equipment shall, in the opinion of the City’s Representative, be in good working condition and suitable for the purpose for which the equipment is to be used. v. Before construction equipment is used on the Additional Work, Contractor shall plainly stencil or stamp an identifying number thereon at a conspicuous location, and shall furnish to the City’s Representative, in duplicate, a description of the equipment and its identifying number and the scheduled Additional Work activities planned. vi. Unless otherwise specified, manufacturer’s rating and manufacturer approved modifications shall be used to classify equipment for the determination of applicable rental rates. Equipment which has no direct power unit shall be powered by a unit of at least the minimum rating recommended by the manufacturer. f. Special Services. Special work or services are defined as that Additional Work characterized by extraordinary complexity, sophistication, or innovation or a combination of the foregoing attributes which are unique to the construction industry. i. Invoices for Special Services. When the City’s Representative and Contractor determine that a special service is required which cannot be performed by the forces of Contractor or those of any of its Subcontractors, the special service may be performed by an entity especially skilled in the Additional Work. Invoices for special services based upon the current fair market value thereof may be accepted without complete itemization of labor, material, and equipment rental costs, after validation of market values by the City’s Representative. ii. Discount and Allowance. All invoices for special services will be adjusted by deducting all trade discounts offered or available, whether the discounts were taken or not. In lieu of Overhead and Profit specified herein, a total allowance not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) for Overhead and Profit will be added to invoices for Special Services. iii. When the City determines, in its sole discretion, that competitive bidding is necessary for certain special services, Contractor shall solicit competitive bids for those special services. g. Excluded Costs. The term Time and Material shall not include any of the following costs or any other home or field office overhead costs, all of which are to be considered administrative costs covered by Contractor’s allowance for Overhead and Profit. Page 542 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -64- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS i. Overhead Cost. Payroll costs and other compensation of Contractor’s officers, executives, principals, general managers, engineers, architects, estimators, attorneys, auditors, accountants, purchasing and contracting agents, timekeepers, clerks, and other personnel employed by Contractor whether at the Site or in Contractor’s principal office or any branch office, material yard, or shop for general administration of the Additional Work; ii. Office Expenses. Expenses of Contractor’s principal and branch offices; iii. Capital Expenses. Any part of Contractor’s capital expenses, including interest on Contractor’s capital employed for the Additional Work and charges against Contractor for delinquent payments; iv. Negligence. Costs due to the negligence of Contractor or any Subcontractor or Supplier, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or for whose acts any of them may be liable, including without limitation the correction of Defective Work, disposal of materials or equipment wrongly supplied, and making good any damage to property; v. Other. Other overhead or general expense costs of any kind and the cost of any item not specifically and expressly included in the Contract Documents; vi. Small Tools. Cost of small tools valued at less than $1,000 and that remain the property of Contractor; vii. Administrative Costs. Costs associated with the preparation of Change Orders (whether or not ultimately authorized), cost estimates, or the preparation or filing of Claims; viii. Anticipated Lost Profits. Expenses of Contractor associated with anticipated lost profits or lost revenues, lost income or earnings, lost interest on earnings, or unpaid retention; ix. Home Office Overhead. Costs derived from the computation of a “home office overhead” rate by application of the Eichleay, Allegheny, burden fluctuation, or other similar methods; x. Special Consultants and Attorneys. Costs of special consultants or attorneys, whether or not in the direct employ of Contractor, employed for services specifically related to the resolution of a Claim, dispute, or other matter arising out of or relating to the performance of the Additional Work. h. Overhead, Profit and Other Charges. The mark-up for overhead (including supervision) and profit on work added to the Contract shall be according to the following: i. “Net Cost” is defined as consisting of costs of labor, materials, and tools and equipment only excluding overhead and profit. The costs of applicable Page 543 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -65- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS insurance and bond premium will be reimbursed to the Contractor and subcontractors at cost only, without mark-up. Contractor shall provide City with documentation of the costs, including, but not limited to, payroll records, invoices, and such other information as City may reasonably request. ii. For Work performed by the Contractor’s forces, the added cost for overhead and profit shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the Net Cost of the Work. iii. For Work performed by a subcontractor, the added cost for overhead and profit shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the subcontractor’s Net Cost of the Work to which the Contractor may add five percent (5%) of the subcontractor’s Net Cost. iv. For Work performed by a sub-subcontractor, the added cost for overhead and profit shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the sub-subcontractor’s Net Cost for Work to which the subcontractor and general contractor may each add an additional five percent (5%) of the Net Cost of the lower tier subcontractor. v. No additional mark-up will be allowed for lower tier subcontractors, and in no case shall the added cost for overhead and profit payable by City exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the Net Cost as defined herein, of the party that performs the Work. 5. All of the following costs are included in the markups for overhead and profit described above, and Contractor shall not receive any additional compensation for: Submittals, drawings, field drawings, Shop Drawings, including submissions of drawings; field inspection; General Superintendence; General administration and preparation of cost proposals, schedule analysis, Change Orders, and other supporting documentation; computer services; reproduction services; Salaries of project engineer, superintendent, timekeeper, storekeeper, and secretaries; Janitorial services; Small tools, incidentals and consumables; Temporary On-Site facilities (Offices, Telephones, High Speed Internet Access, Plumbing, Electrical Power, Lighting; Platforms, Fencing, Water), Jobsite and Home office overhead or other expenses; vehicles and fuel used for work otherwise included in the Contract Documents; Surveying; Estimating; Protection of Work; Handling and disposal fees; Final Cleanup; Other Incidental Work; Related Warranties; insurance and bond premiums. 6. For added or deducted Work by subcontractors, the Contractor shall furnish to the City the subcontractor’s signed detailed record of the cost of labor, material and equipment, including the subcontractor markup for overhead and profit. The same requirement shall apply to sub-subcontractors 7. For added or deducted work furnished by a vendor or supplier, the Contractor shall furnish to the City a detailed record of the cost to the Contractor, signed by such vendor or supplier. Page 544 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -66- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS 8. Any change in the Work involving both additions and deletions shall indicate a net total cost, including subcontracts and materials. Allowance for overhead and profit, as specified herein, shall be applied if the net total cost is an increase in the Contract Price; overhead and profit allowances shall not be applied if the net total cost is a deduction to the Contract Price. The estimated cost of deductions shall be based on labor and material prices on the date the Contract was executed. 9. Contractor shall not reserve a right to assert impact costs, extended job site costs, extended overhead, constructive acceleration and/or actual acceleration beyond what is stated in the Change Order for W ork. No claims shall be allowed for impact, extended overhead costs, constructive acceleration and/or actual acceleration due to a multiplicity of changes and/or clarifications. The Contractor may not change or modify the City’s change order form in an attempt to reserve additional rights. 10. If the City disagrees with the proposal submitted by Contractor, it will notify the Contractor and the City will provide its opinion of the appropriate price and/or time extension. If the Contractor agrees with the City, a Change Order will be issued by the City. If no agreement can be reached, the City shall have the right to issue a unilateral Change Order setting forth its determination of the reasonable additions or savings in costs and time attributable to the extra or deleted work. Such determination shall become final and binding if the Contractor fails to submit a claim in writing to the City within fifteen (15) Days of the issuance of the unilateral Change Order, disputing the terms of the unilateral Change Order, and providing such supporting documentation for its position as the City may require. C. Change of Contract Times. 1. The Contract Times may only be changed by a Change Order. 2. All changes in the Contract Price and/or adjustments to the Contract Times related to each change shall be included in Contractor’s COR pursuant to this Article. No cost or time will be allowed for cumulative effects of multiple changes. All Change Orders must state that the Contract Time is not changed or is either increased or decreased by a specific number of days. Failure to include a change to time shall waive any change to the time unless the parties mutually agree in writing to postpone a determination of the change to time resulting from the Change Order. 3. Notice of the amount of the request for adjustment in the Contract Times with supporting data shall be delivered within seven (7) Days after such start of occurrence, unless City’s Representative allows an additional period of time to ascertain more accurate data in support of the request. No extension of time or additional compensation shall be given for a delay if the Contractor failed to give notice in the manner and within the time prescribed. 4. City may elect, at City’s sole discretion, to grant an extension in Contract Times, without Contractor’s request, because of delays or other factors. 5. Use of Float and Critical Path. Page 545 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -67- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS a. Float is for the benefit of the Project. Float shall not be considered for the exclusive use or benefit of either the City or the Contractor. b. Contractor shall not be entitled to compensation, and City will not compensate Contractor, for delays which impact early completion. Any difference in time between the Contractor’s early completion and the Contract Time shall be considered a part of the Project float. 6. Contractor’s entitlement to an extension of the Contract Times is limited to a City- caused extension of the critical path, reduced by the Contractor’s concurrent delays, and established by a proper time impact analysis. No time extension shall be allowed unless, and then only to the extent that, the City-caused delay extends the critical path beyond the previously approved Contract Time. If approved, the increase in time required to complete the Work shall be added to the Contract Time. a. Contractor shall not be entitled to an adjustment in the Contract Price or Contract Times for delays within the control of Contractor. Delays attributable to and within the control of a Subcontractor or Supplier shall be deemed to be delays within the control of Contractor. b. If Contractor is delayed in the performance or progress of the Work by fire, flood, epidemic, pandemic, abnormal weather conditions (as determined by the City), Acts of God, acts or failures to act of utility owners not under the control of City, or other causes not the fault of and beyond control of City and Contractor, then Contractor shall be entitled to an time extension when the Work stopped is on the critical path. Such a non-compensable adjustment shall be Contractor’s sole and exclusive remedy for such delays. Contractor must submit a timely request in accordance with the requirements of this Article. c. Utility-Related Delays. i. Contractor shall immediately notify in writing the utility owner and City’s Representative of its construction schedule and any subsequent changes in the construction schedule which will affect the time available for protection, removal, or relocation of utilities. Requests for extensions of time arising out of utility relocation or repair delays shall be filed in accordance with this Article. ii. Contractor shall not be entitled to damages or additional payment for delays attributable to utility relocations or alterations if correctly located, as noted in the Contract Documents or by the Underground Service Alert survey. 7. Content for Requests for Contract Extension. Contractor’s justification for entitlement shall be clear and complete citing specific Contract Document references and reasons on which Contractor’s entitlement is based. At a minimum, each request for a time extension must include: Page 546 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -68- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS a. Each request for an extension of Contract Time must identify the impacting event, in narrative form, providing a description of the delay event and sufficient justification as to why the Contractor is entitled to a time extension. Contractor must demonstrate that the delay arises from unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of both Contractor and any Subcontractors or Suppliers, or any other persons or organizations employed by any of them or for whose acts any of them may be liable, and that such causes in fact lead to performance or completion of the Work, or specified part in question, beyond the corresponding Contract Times, despite Contractor’s reasonable and diligent actions to guard against those effects. b. Each request for an extension of Contract Time must include a time impact analysis in CPM format, using the Contemporaneous Impacted As-Planned Schedule Analysis to calculate the impact of the delay event. 8. No Damages for Reasonable Delay. a. City’s liability to Contractor for delays for which City is responsible shall be limited to only an extension of time unless such delays were unreasonable under the circumstances. In no case shall City be liable for any costs which are borne by the Contractor in the regular course of business, including, but not limited to, home office overhead and other ongoing costs. b. Damages caused by unreasonable City delay that impact the critical path, including delays caused by items that are the responsibility of the City pursuant to Government Code section 4215, shall be compensated at the Daily Rate established in the Special Conditions. No other calculations, proportions or formulas shall be used to calculate any delay damages. c. City and City’s Representative, and the officers, members, partners, employees, agents, consultants, or subcontractors of each of them, shall not be liable to Contractor for any claims, costs, losses, or damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) sustained by Contractor on or in connection with any other project or anticipated project. 9. Contractor’s failure, neglect, or refusal to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents, or any portion thereof, shall bar Contractor’s request for extensions of the Contract Times. Such failure, neglect, or refusal prejudices City’s and City’s Representative’s ability to recognize and mitigate delay, and such failure, neglect, or refusal prevent the timely analysis of requests for extensions of Contract Times, and whether such extensions may be warranted. Contractor hereby waives all rights to extensions of Contract Times due to delays or accelerations that result from or occur during periods of time for which Contr actor fails, neglects, or refuses to fully comply with the requirements of this Article. Page 547 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -69- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS ARTICLE 45. FINAL ACCEPTANCE AND PAYMENT A. The acceptance of the Work on behalf of the City will be made by the Engineer. Such acceptance by the City shall not constitute a waiver of defects. When the Work has been accepted there shall be paid to Contractor a sum equal to the contract price less any amounts previously paid Contractor and less any amounts withheld by the City from Contractor under the terms of the contract. The final five percent (5%), or the percentage specified in the notice inviting bids where the City has adopted a finding of substantially complete, shall not become due and payable until five (5) calendar days shall have elapsed after the expiration of the period within which all claims may be filed under the provisions of Civil Code section 9356. If the Contractor has placed securities with the City as described herein, the Contractor shall be paid a sum equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price less any amounts due the City under the terms of the Contract. B. Unless Contractor advises the City in writing prior to acceptance of the final five percent (5%) or the percentage specified in the notice inviting bids where the City has adopted a finding of substantially complete, or the return of securities held as described herein, said acceptance shall operate as a release to the City of all claims and all liability to Contractor for all things done or furnished in connection with this work and for every act of negligence of the City and for all other claims relating to or arising out of this work. If Contractor advises the City in writing prior to acceptance of final payment or return of the securities that there is a dispute regarding the amount due the Contractor, the City may pay the undisputed amount contingent upon the Contractor furnishing a release of all undisputed claims against the City with the disputed claims in stated amounts being specifically excluded by Contractor from the operation of the release. No payments, however, final or otherwise, shall operate to release Contractor or its sureties from the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Payment Bond, or from any other obligation under this contract. C. In case of suspension of the contract any unpaid balance shall be and become the sole and absolute property of the City to the extent necessary to repay the City any excess in the cost of the Work above the contract price. D. Final payment shall be made no later than 60 days after the date of acceptance of the Work by the City or the date of occupation, beneficial use and enjoyment of the Work by the City including any operation only for testing, start-up or commissioning accompanied by cessation of labor on the Work, provided that a release of liens and claims has been received from the Contractor pursuant to Civil Code section 8136. In the event of a dispute between the City and the Contractor, the City may withhold from the final payment an amount not to exceed 150% of the disputed amount. E. Within ten (10) calendar days from the time that all or any portion of the retention proceeds are received by Contractor, Contractor shall pay each of its subcontractors from whom retention has been withheld each subcontractor’s share of the retention received. However, if a retention payment received by Contractor is specifically designated for a particular subcontractor, payment of the retention shall be made to the designated subcontractor if the payment is consistent with the terms of the subcontract. Page 548 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -70- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS ARTICLE 46. OCCUPANCY The City reserves the right to occupy or utilize any portion of the Work at any time before completion, and such occupancy or use shall not constitute acceptance of any part of Work covered by this Contract. This use shall not relieve the Contractor of its responsibilities under the Contract. ARTICLE 47. INDEMNIFICATION To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall immediately defend (with counsel of the City’s choosing), indemnify and hold harmless the City, officials, officers, agents, employees, and representatives, and each of them from and against: A. Any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, injuries, losses or liabilities, in law or in equity, of every kind or nature whatsoever, but not limited to, injury to or death, including wrongful death, of any person, and damages to or destruction of property of any person, arising out of, related to, or in any manner directly or indirectly connected with the Work or this Contract, including claims made by subcontractors for nonpayment, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages and attorney’s fees and other related costs and expenses, however caused, regardless of whether the allegations are false, fraudulent, or groundless, and regardless of any negligence of the City or its officers, employees, or authorized volunteers (including passive negligence), except the sole negligence or willful misconduct or active negligence of the City or its officials, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers. B. Contractor’s defense and indemnity obligation herein includes, but is not limited to damages, fines, penalties, attorney’s fees and costs arising from claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or other federal or state disability access or discrimination laws arising from Contractor’s Work during the course of construction of the improvements or after the Work is complete, as the result of defects or negligence in Contractor’s construction of the improvements. C. Any and all actions, proceedings, damages, costs, expenses, fines, penalties or liabilities, in law or equity, of every kind or nature whatsoever, arising out of, resulting from, or on account of the violation of any governmental law or regulation, compliance with which is the responsibility of Contractor; D. Any and all losses, expenses, damages (including damages to the Work itself), attorney’s fees, and other costs, including all costs of defense which any of them may incur with respect to the failure, neglect, or refusal of Contractor to faithfully perform the Work and all of Contractor’s obligations under the agreement. Such costs, expenses, and damages shall include all costs, including attorney’s fees, incurred by the indemnified parties in any lawsuit to which they are a party. Contractor shall immediately defend, at Contractor’s own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees and representatives. Contractor shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against the City, its officials, Page 549 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -71- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS officers, employees, agents, employees and representatives, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Contractor shall reimburse the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees and representatives for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. The only limitations on this provision shall be those imposed by Civil Code section 2782. ARTICLE 48. PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING DISPUTES Contractor shall timely comply with all notices and requests for changes to the Contract Time or Contract Price, including but not limited to all requirements of Article 44, Changes and Extra Work, as a prerequisite to filing any claim governed by this Article. The failure to timely submit a notice of delay or notice of change, or to timely request a change to the Contract Price or Contract Time, or to timely provide any other notice or request required herein shall constitute a waiver of the right to further pursue the claim under the Contract or at law. A. Intent. Effective January 1, 1991, Section 20104 et seq., of the California Public Contract Code prescribes a process utilizing informal conferences, non-binding judicial supervised mediation, and judicial arbitration to resolve disputes on construction claims of $375,000 or less. Effective January 1, 2017, Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code prescribes a process for negotiation and mediation to resolve disputes on construction claims. The intent of this Article is to implement Sections 20104 et seq. and Section 9204 of the California Public Contract Code. This Article shall be construed to be consistent with said statutes. B. Claims. For purposes of this Article, “Claim” means a separate demand by the Contractor, after a change order duly requested in accordance with Article 44 “Changes and Extra Work” has been denied by the City, for (A) a time extension, (B) payment of money or damages arising from Work done by or on behalf of the Contractor pursuant to the Contract, or (C) an amount the payment of which is disputed by the City. Claims governed by this Article may not be filed unless and until the Contractor completes all procedures for giving notice of delay or change and for t he requesting of a time extension or change order, including but not necessarily limited to the procedures contained in Article 44, Changes and Extra Work, and Contractor’s request for a change has been denied in whole or in part. Claims governed by this Article must be filed no later than the date of final payment. The claim shall be submitted in writing to the City and shall include on its first page the following in 16 point capital font: “THIS IS A CLAIM.” Furthermore, the claim shall include the documents necessary to substantiate the claim. Nothing herein is intended to extend the time limit or supersede notice requirements otherwise provided by contract for the filing of claims, including all requirements pertaining to compensation or payment for extra Work, disputed Work, and/or changed conditions. Failure to follow such contractual requirements shall bar any claims or subsequent lawsuits for compensation or payment thereon. C. Supporting Documentation. The Contractor shall submit all claims in the following format: 1. Summary of claim merit and price, reference Contract Document provisions pursuant to which the claim is made Page 550 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -72- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS 2. List of documents relating to claim: a. Specifications b. Drawings c. Clarifications (Requests for Information) d. Schedules e. Other 3. Chronology of events and correspondence 4. Analysis of claim merit 5. Analysis of claim cost 6. Time impact analysis in CPM format 7. If Contractor’s claim is based in whole or in part on an allegation of errors or omissions in the Drawings or Specifications for the Project, Contractor shall provide a summary of the percentage of the claim subject to design errors or omissions and shall obtain a certificate of merit in support of the claim of design errors and omissions. D. City’s Response. Upon receipt of a claim pursuant to this Article, City shall conduct a reasonable review of the claim and, within a period not to exceed 45 Days, shall provide the Contractor a written statement identifying what portion of the claim is disputed and what portion is undisputed. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim will be processed and made within 60 Days after the City issues its written statement. 1. If the City needs approval from its governing body to provide the Contractor a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion of the claim, and the City’s governing body does not meet within the 45 Days or within the mutually agreed to extension of time following receipt of a claim sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, the City shall have up to three Days following the next duly publicly noticed meeting of the City’s governing body after the 45-Day period, or extension, expires to provide the Contractor a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion. 2. Within 30 Days of receipt of a claim, the City may request in writing additional documentation supporting the claim or relating to defenses or claims the City may have against the Contractor. If additional information is thereafter required, it shall be requested and provided pursuant to this subdivision, upon mutual agreement of City and the Contractor. The City’s written response to the claim, as further documented, shall be submitted to the Contractor within 30 Days (if the claim is less than $15,000, within 15 Days) after receipt of the further documentation, or Page 551 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -73- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS within a period of time no greater than that taken by the Contractor in producing the additional information or requested documentation, whichever is greater. E. Meet and Confer. If the Contractor disputes the City’s written response, or the City fails to respond within the time prescribed, the Contractor may so notify the City, in writing, either within 15 Days of receipt of the City’s response or within 15 Days of the City’s failure to respond within the time prescribed, respectively, and demand in writing an informal conference to meet and confer for settlement of the issues in dispute. Upon receipt of a demand, the City shall schedule a meet and confer conference within 30 Days for settlement of the dispute. F. Mediation. Within 10 business Days following the conclusion of the meet and confer conference, if the claim or any portion of the claim remains in dispute, the City shall provide the Contractor a written statement identifying the portion of the claim that remains in dispute and the portion that is undisputed. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim shall be processed and made within 60 Days after the City issues its written statement. Any disputed portion of the claim, as identified by the Contractor in writing, shall be submitted to nonbinding mediation, with the City and the Contractor sharing the associated costs equally. The City and Contractor shall mutually agree to a mediator within 10 business Days after the disputed portion of the claim has been identified in writing, unless the parties agree to select a mediator at a later time. 1. If the parties cannot agree upon a mediator, each party shall select a mediator and those mediators shall select a qualified neutral third party to mediate with regard to the disputed portion of the claim. Each party shall bear the fees and costs charged by its respective mediator in connection with the selection of the neutral mediator. 2. For purposes of this section, mediation includes any nonbinding process, including, but not limited to, neutral evaluation or a dispute review board, in which an independent third party or board assists the parties in dispute resolution through negotiation or by issuance of an evaluation. Any mediation utilized shall conform to the timeframes in this section. 3. Unless otherwise agreed to by the City and the Contractor in writing, the mediation conducted pursuant to this section shall excuse any further obligation under Public Contract Code Section 20104.4 to mediate after litigation has been commenced. 4. The mediation shall be held no earlier than the date the Contractor completes the Work or the date that the Contractor last performs Work, whichever is earlier. All unresolved claims shall be considered jointly in a single mediation, unless a new unrelated claim arises after mediation is completed. G. Procedures After Mediation. If following the mediation, the claim or any portion remains in dispute, the Contractor must file a claim pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 900) and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 910) of Part 3 of Division 3.6 of Title 1 of the Government Code prior to initiating litigation. For purposes of those provisions, the running of the period of time within which a claim Page 552 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -74- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS must be filed shall be tolled from the time the Contractor submits his or her written claim pursuant to subdivision (a) until the time the claim is denied, including any period of time utilized by the meet and confer conference. H. Civil Actions. The following procedures are established for all civil actions filed to resolve claims of $375,000 or less: 1. Within 60 Days, but no earlier than 30 Days, following the filing or responsive pleadings, the court shall submit the matter to non-binding mediation unless waived by mutual stipulation of both parties or unless mediation was held prior to commencement of the action in accordance with Public Contract Code section 9204 and the terms of this Contract. The mediation process shall provide for the selection within 15 Days by both parties of a disinterested third person as mediator, shall be commenced within 30 Days of the submittal, and shall be concluded within 15 Days from the commencement of the mediation unless a time requirement is extended upon a good cause showing to the court. 2. If the matter remains in dispute, the case shall be submitted to judicial arbitration pursuant to Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 1141.10) of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, notwithstanding Section 1114.11 of that code. The Civil Discovery Act of 1986 (Article 3 (commencing with Section 2016) of Chapter 3 of Title 3 of Part 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure) shall apply to any proceeding brought under this subdivision consistent with the rules pertaining to judicial arbitration. In addition to Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 1141.10) of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (A) arbitrators shall, when possible, be experienced in construction law, and (B) any party appealing an arbitration award who does not obtain a more favorable judgment shall, in addition to payment of costs and fees under that chapter, also pay the attorney’s fees on appeal of the other party. I. Government Code Claims. In addition to any and all contract requirements pertaining to notices of and requests for compensation or payment for extra Work, disputed Work, construction claims and/or changed conditions, the Contractor must comply with the claim procedures set forth in Government Code Sections 900, et seq. prior to filing any lawsuit against the City. Such Government Code claims and any subsequent lawsuit based upon the Government Code claims shall be limited to those matters that remain unresolved after all procedures pertaining to extra Work, disputed Work, construction claims, and/or changed conditions have been followed by Contractor. If no such Government Code claim is submitted, or if the prerequisite contractual requirements are not satisfied, no action against the City may be filed. A Government Code claim must be filed no earlier than the date the Work is completed or the date the Contractor last performs Work on the Project, whichever occurs first. A Government Code claim shall be inclusive of all unresolved claims unless a new unrelated claim arises after the Government Code claim is submitted. J. Non-Waiver. The City’s failure to respond to a claim from the Contractor within the time periods described in this Article or to otherwise meet the time requirements of this Article shall result in the claim being deemed rejected in its entirety. Page 553 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -75- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS ARTICLE 49. CITY’S RIGHT TO TERMINATE CONTRACT A. Termination for Cause by the City: 1. In the sole estimation of the City, if the Contractor refuses or fails to prosecute the Work or any separable part thereof with such diligence as will insure its completion within the time specified by the Contract Documents, or any extension thereof, or fails to complete such Work within such time, or if the Contractor should be adjudged a bankrupt, or if it should make a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed on account of its insolvency, or the Contractor or any of its subcontractors should violate any of the provisions of this Contract, the City may serve written notice upon the Contractor and its Surety of the City's intention to terminate this Contract. This notice of intent to terminate shall contain the reasons for such intention to terminate this Contract, and a statement to the effect that the Contractor's right to perform this Contract shall cease and terminate upon the expiration of ten (10) calendar days unless such violations have ceased and arrangements satisfactory to the City have been made for correction of said violations. 2. In the event that the City serves such written notice of termination upon the Contractor and the Surety, the Surety shall have the right to take over and perform the Contract. If the Surety does not: (1) give the City written notice of Surety's intention to take over and commence performance of the Contract within 15 calendar days of the City's service of said notice of intent to terminate upon Surety; and (2) actually commence performance of the Contract within 30 calendar days of the City's service of said notice upon Surety; then the City may take over the Work and prosecute the same to completion by separate contract or by any other method it may deem advisable for the account and at the expense of the Contractor. 3. In the event that the City elects to obtain an alternative performance of the Contract as specified above: (1) the City may, without liability for so doing, take possession of and utilize in completion of the Work such materials, appliances, plants and other property belonging to the Contractor that are on the site and reasonably necessary for such completion (A special lien to secure the claims of the City in the event of such suspension is hereby created against any property of Contractor taken into the possession of the City under the terms hereof and such lien may be enforced by sale of such property under the direction of the City without notice to Contractor. The proceeds of the sale after deducting all expenses thereof and connected therewith shall be credited to Contractor. If the net credits shall be in excess of the claims of the City against Contractor, the balance will be paid to Contractor or Contractor’s legal representatives.); and (2) Surety shall be liable to the City for any cost or other damage to the City necessitated by the City securing an alternate performance pursuant to this Article. B. Termination for Convenience by the City: Page 554 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -76- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The City may terminate performance of the Work called for by the Cont ract Documents in whole or, from time to time, in part, if the City determines that a termination is in the City's interest. 2. The Contractor shall terminate all or any part of the Work upon delivery to the Contractor of a Notice of Termination specifying that the termination is for the convenience of the City, the extent of termination, and the Effective Date of such termination. 3. After receipt of Notice of Termination, and except as directed by the City's Representative, the Contractor shall, regardless of any delay in determining or adjusting any amounts due under this Termination for Convenience clause, immediately proceed with the following obligations: a. Stop Work as specified in the Notice. b. Complete any Work specified in the Notice of Termination in a least cost/shortest time manner while still maintaining the quality called for under the Contract Documents. c. Leave the property upon which the Contractor was working and upon which the facility (or facilities) forming the basis of the Contract Document is situated in a safe and sanitary manner such that it does not pose any threat to the public health or safety. d. Terminate all subcontracts to the extent that they relate to the portions of the Work terminated. e. Place no further subcontracts or orders, except as necessary to complete the continued portion of the Contract. f. Submit to the City's Representative, within ten (10) calendar days from the Effective Date of the Notice of Termination, all of the usual documentation called for by the Contract Documents to substantiate all costs incurred by the Contractor for labor, materials and equipment through the Effective Date of the Notice of Termination. Any documentation substantiating costs incurred by the Contractor solely as a result of the City's exercise of its right to terminate this Contract pursuant to this clause, which costs the contractor is authorized under the Contract documents to incur, shall: (1) be submitted to and received by the Engineer no later than 30 calendar days after the Effective Date of the Notice of Termination; (2) describe the costs incurred with particularity; and (3) be conspicuously identified as “Termination Costs occasioned by the City's Termination for Convenience.” 4. Termination of the Contract shall not relieve Surety of its obligation for any just claims arising out of or relating to the Work performed. 5. In the event that the City exercises its right to terminate this Contract pursuant to this clause, the City shall pay the Contractor, upon the Contractor's submission of the Page 555 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -77- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS documentation required by this clause and other applicable provisions of the Contract Documents, the following amounts: a. All actual reimbursable costs incurred according to the provisions of this Contract. b. A reasonable allowance for profit on the cost of the Work performed, provided Contractor establishes to the satisfaction of the City's Representative that it is reasonably probable that Contractor would have made a profit had the Contract been completed and provided further, that the profit allowed shall in no event exceed fifteen (15%) percent of the costs. c. A reasonable allowance for Contractor's administrative costs in determining the amount payable due to termination of the Contract under this Article. C. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article, when immediate action is necessary to protect life and safety or to reduce significant exposure or liability, the City may immediately order Contractor to cease Work on the Project until such safety or liability issues are addressed to the satisfaction of the City or the Contract is terminated. D. City shall not be liable for any costs other than the charges or portions thereof which are specified herein. Contractor shall not be entitled to payment for unperformed Work including, without limitation, any overhead and profit on the portion of the Work that is terminated and shall not be entitled to damages or compensation of any kind or nature for termination of Work. ARTICLE 50. WARRANTY AND GUARANTEE OF WORK A. Contractor hereby warrants that materials and Work shall be completed in conformance with the Contract Documents and that the materials and Work provided will fulfill the requirements of this Warranty. Contractor hereby agrees to repair or replace, at the discretion of the City, any or all Work that may prove to be defective in its workmanship, materials furnished, methods of installation or fail to conform to the Contract Document requirements together with any other Work which may be damaged or displaced by such defect(s) within a period of one (1) year from the date of the Notice of Completion of the Project without any expense whatever to the City, ordinary wear and tear and unusual abuse and neglect excepted. Contractor shall be required to promptly repair or replace defective equipment or materials, at Contractor’s option. All costs associated with such corrective actions and testing, including the removal, replacement, and reinstitution of equipment and materials necessary to gain access, shall be the sole responsibility of the Contractor. B. For any Work so corrected, Contractor’s obligation hereunder to correct defective Work shall be reinstated for an additional one (1) year period, commencing with the date of acceptance of such corrected Work. The reinstatement of the one (1) year warranty shall apply only to that portion of work that was corrected. Contractor shall perform such tests as City may require to verify that any corrective actions, including, without limitation, redesign, repairs, and replacements comply with the requirements Page 556 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -78- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS of the Contract. In the event of Contractor’s failure to comply with the above- mentioned conditions within ten (10) calendar days after being notified in writing of required repairs, to the reasonable satisfaction of the City, the City shall have the right to correct and replace any defective or non-conforming Work and any work damaged by such work or the replacement or correction thereof at Contractor’s sole expense. Contractor shall be obligated to fully reimburse the City for any expenses incurred hereunder immediately upon demand. C. In addition to the warranty set forth in this Article, Contractor shall obtain for City all warranties that would be given in normal commercial practice and assign to City any and all manufacturer’s or installer’s warranties for equipment or materials not manufactured by Contractor and provided as part of the Work, to the extent that such third-party warranties are assignable and extend beyond the warranty period set forth in this Article. Contractor shall furnish the City with all warranty and guarantee documents prior to final Acceptance of the Project by the City as required. D. When specifically indicated in the Contract Documents or when directed by the Engineer, the City may furnish materials or products to the Contractor for installation. In the event any act or failure to act by Contractor shall cause a warranty applicable to any materials or products purchased by the City for installation by the Contractor to be voided or reduced, Contractor shall indemnify City from and against any cost, expense, or other liability arising therefrom, and shall be responsible to the City for the cost of any repairs, replacement or other costs that would have been covered by the warranty but for such act or failure to act by Contractor. E. The Contractor shall remedy at its expense any damage to City-owned or controlled real or personal property. F. The City shall notify the Contractor, in writing, within a reasonable time after the discovery of any failure, defect, or damage. The Contractor shall within ten (10) calendar days after being notified commence and perform with due diligence all necessary Work. If the Contractor fails to promptly remedy any defect, or damage; the City shall have the right to replace, repair or otherwise remedy the defect, or damage at the Contractor’s expense. G. In the event of any emergency constituting an immediate hazard to health, safety, property, or licensees, when caused by Work of the Contractor not in accordance with the Contract requirements, the City may undertake at Contractor’s expense, and without prior notice, all Work necessary to correct such condition. H. Acceptance of Defective Work. 1. If, instead of requiring correction or removal and replacement of Defective Work, the City prefers to accept it, City may do so. Contractor shall pay all claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) attributable to City’s evaluation of and determination to accept such Defective Work and for the diminished value of the Work. Page 557 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -79- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS 2. If any acceptance of defective work occurs prior to release of the Project Retention, a Change Order will be issued incorporating the necessary revisions in the Contract Documents with respect to the Work, and City shall be entitled to an appropriate decrease in the Contract Price, reflecting the diminished value of Work and all costs incurred by City. 3. If the Project Retention is held in an escrow account as permitted by the Contract Documents, Contractor will promptly alert the escrow holder, in writing, of the amount of Retention to be paid to City. 4. If the acceptance of Defective Work occurs after release of the Project Retention, an appropriate amount will be paid by Contractor to City. I. City May Correct Defective Work. 1. If Contractor fails within a reasonable time after written notice from City’s Representative to correct Defective Work, or to remove and replace rejected Work as required by City, or if Contractor fails to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents, or if Contractor fails to comply with any other provision of the Contract Documents, City may, after seven (7) Days’ written notice to Contractor, correct, or remedy any such deficiency. 2. In connection with such corrective or remedial action, City may exclude Contractor from all or part of the Site, take possession of all or part of the Work and suspend Contractor’s services related thereto, take possession of Contractor’s tools, appliances, construction equipment and machinery at the Site, and incorporate in the Work all materials and equipment stored at the Site or for which City has paid Contractor but which are stored elsewhere. Contractor shall allow City and City’s Representative, and the agents, employees, other contractors, and consultants of each of them, access to the Site to enable City to exercise the rights and remedies to correct the Defective Work. 3. All claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) incurred or sustained by City correcting the Defective Work will be charged against Contractor, and a Change Order will be issued incorporating the necessary revisions into the Contract Documents with respect to the Work; and City shall be entitled to an appropriate decrease in the Contract Price. 4. Such claims, costs, losses and damages will include, but not be limited to, all costs of repair, or replacement of work of others destroyed or damaged by correction, removal, or replacement of Defective Work. 5. If the Change Order is executed after all payments under the Contract have been paid by City and the Project Retention is held in an escrow account as permitted by the Contract Documents, Contractor will promptly alert the escrow holder, in writing, of the amount of Retention to be paid to City. Page 558 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -80- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS 6. If the Change Order is executed after release of the Project Retention, an appropriate amount will be paid by Contractor to City. 7. Contractor shall not be allowed an extension of the Contract Times because of any delay in the performance of the Work attributable to City correcting Defective work. J. Nothing in the Warranty or in the Contract Documents shall be construed to limit the rights and remedies available to City at law or in equity, including, but not limited to, Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15. ARTICLE 51. DOCUMENT RETENTION & EXAMINATION A. In accordance with Government Code section 8546.7, records of both the City and the Contractor shall be subject to examination and audit by the State Auditor General for a period of three (3) years after final payment. B. Contractor shall make available to the City any of the Contractor’s other documents related to the Project immediately upon request of the City. C. In addition to the State Auditor rights above, the City shall have the right to examine and audit all books, estimates, records, contracts, documents, bid documents, subcontracts, and other data of the Contractor (including computations and projections) related to negotiating, pricing, or performing the modification in order to evaluate the accuracy and completeness of the cost or pricing data at no additional cost to the City, for a period of four (4) years after final payment. ARTICLE 52. SEPARATE CONTRACTS A. The City reserves the right to let other contracts in connection with this Work or on the Project site. Contractor shall permit other contractors reasonable access and storage of their materials and execution of their work and shall properly connect and coordinate its Work with theirs. B. To ensure proper execution of its subsequent Work, Contractor shall immediately inspect work already in place and shall at once report to the Engineer any problems with the W ork in place or discrepancies with the Contract Documents. C. Contractor shall ascertain to its own satisfaction the scope of the Project and nature of any other contracts that have been or may be awarded by the City in prosecution of the Project to the end that Contractor may perform this Contract in the light of such other contracts, if any. Nothing herein contained shall be interpreted as granting to Contractor exclusive occupancy at site of the Project. Contractor shall not cause any unnecessary hindrance or delay to any other contractor working on the Project. If simultaneous execution of any contract for the Project is likely to cause interference with performance of some other contract or contracts, the Engineer shall decide which Contractor shall cease Work temporarily and which contractor shall continue or whether work can be coordinated so that contractors may proceed simultaneously. The City shall not be responsible for any damages suffered or for extra costs incurred Page 559 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -81- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS by Contractor resulting directly or indirectly from award, performance, or attempted performance of any other contract or contracts on the Project site. ARTICLE 53. NOTICE AND SERVICE THEREOF All notices shall be in writing and either served by personal delivery or mailed to the other party as designated in the Bid Forms. Written notice to the Contractor shall be addressed to Contractor’s principal place of business unless Contractor designates another address in writing for service of notice. Notice to City shall be addressed to the City as designated in the Notice Inviting Bids unless City designates another address in writing for service of notice. Notice shall be effective upon receipt or five (5) calendar days after being sent by first class mail, whichever is earlier. Notice given by facsimile shall not be effective unless acknowledged in writing by the receiving party. ARTICLE 54. NOTICE OF THIRD PARTY CLAIMS Pursuant to Public Contract Code section 9201, the City shall provide the Contractor with timely notification of the receipt of any third-party claims relating to the Contract. The City is entitled to recover reasonable costs incurred in providing such notification. ARTICLE 55. STATE LICENSE BOARD NOTICE Contractors are required by law to be licensed and regulated by the Contractors’ State License Board which has jurisdiction to investigate complaints against contractors if a complaint regarding a patent act or omission is filed within four (4) years of the date of the alleged violation. A complaint regarding a latent act or omission pertaining to structural defects must be filed within ten (10) years of the date of the alleged violation. Any questions concerning a contractor may be referred to the Registrar, Contractors’ State License Board, P.O. Box 26000, Sacramento, California 95826. ARTICLE 56. INTEGRATION A. Oral Modifications Ineffective. No oral order, objection, direction, claim or notice by any party or person shall affect or modify any of the terms or obligations contained in the Contract Documents. B. Contract Documents Represent Entire Contract. The Contract Documents represent the entire agreement of the City and Contractor. ARTICLE 57. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT Contractor shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the rights or tit le of interest of any or all of this contract without the prior written consent of the City. Any assignment or change of Contractor’s name of legal entity without the written consent of the City shall be void. Any assignment of money due or to become due under this Contract shall be subject to a prior lien for services rendered or Material supplied for performance of Work called for under the Contract Documents in favor of all persons, firms, or corporations rendering such services or supplying such Materials to the extent that claims are filed pursuant to the Civil Code, the Code of Civil Procedure or the Government Code. Page 560 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -82- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS ARTICLE 58. CHANGE IN NAME AND NATURE OF CONTRACTOR’S LEGAL ENTITY Should a change be contemplated in the name or nature of the Contractor’s legal entity, the Contractor shall first notify the City in order that proper steps may be taken to have the change reflected on the Contract and all related documents. No change of Contractor’s name or nature will affect City’s rights under the Contract, including but not limited to the bonds. ARTICLE 59. ASSIGNMENT OF ANTITRUST ACTIONS Pursuant to Public Contract Code section 7103.5, in entering into a public works contract or subcontract to supply goods, services, or materials pursuant to a public works contract, Contractor or subcontractor offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 USC, Section 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from the purchase of goods, services, or materials pursuant to this contract or any subcontract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to the Contractor, without further acknowledgment by the parties. ARTICLE 60. PROHIBITED INTERESTS No City official or representative who is authorized in such capacity and on behalf of the City to negotiate, supervise, make, accept, or approve, or to take part in negotiating, supervising, making, accepting or approving any engineering, inspection, construction or material supply contract or any subcontract in connection with construction of the project, shall be or become directly or indirectly interested financially in the Contract. ARTICLE 61. CONTROLLING LAW Notwithstanding any subcontract or other contract with any subcontractor, supplier, or other person or organization performing any part of the Work, this Contract shall be governed by the law of the State of California excluding any choice of law provisions. ARTICLE 62. JURISDICTION; VENUE Contractor and any subcontractor, supplier, or other person or organization performing any part of the Work agrees that any action or suits at law or in equity arising out of or related to the bidding, award, or performance of the Work shall be maintained in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California, and expressly consent to the jurisdiction of said court, regardless of residence or domicile, and agree that said court shall be a proper venue for any such action. ARTICLE 63. LAWS AND REGULATIONS A. Contractor shall give all notices and comply with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations bearing on conduct of work as indicated and specified. If Contractor observes that drawings and specifications are at variance therewith, it shall promptly notify the Engineer in writing and any necessary changes shall be adjusted as provided for in this Contract for changes in work. If Contractor performs any work knowing it to Page 561 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -83- 00 72 13 – GENERAL CONDITIONS be contrary to such laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, and without such notice to the Engineer, it shall bear all costs arising therefrom. B. Contractor shall be responsible for familiarity with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.). The Work will be performed in compliance with ADA regulations. ARTICLE 64. PATENTS Contractor shall hold and save the City, officials, officers, employees, and authorized volunteers harmless from liability of any nature or kind of claim therefrom including costs and expenses for or on account of any patented or unpatented invention, article or appliance manufactured, furnished or used by Contractor in the performance of this contract. ARTICLE 65. OWNERSHIP OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS All Contract Documents furnished by the City are City property. They are not to be used by Contractor or any subcontractor on other work nor shall Contractor claim any right to such documents. With exception of one complete set of Contract Documents, all documents shall be returned to the City on request at completion of the Work. ARTICLE 66. NOTICE OF TAXABLE POSSESSORY INTEREST In accordance with Revenue and Taxation Code section 107.6, the Contract Documents may create a possessory interest subject to personal property taxation for which Contractor will be responsible. ARTICLE 67. SURVIVAL OF OBLIGATIONS All reresentations, indemnifications, warranties, and guarantees made in, required by, or given in accordance with the Contract Documents, as well as all continuing obligations indicated in the Contract Documents, will survive final payment, completion, and acceptance of the Work or termination or completion of the Contract or termination of the services of Contractor. END OF GENERAL CONDITIONS Page 562 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -84- 00 73 13 – SPECIAL CONDITIONS 00 73 13 – SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1.1 Engineer of Record. A. For purposes of this Project, the Engineer of Record or Engineer shall be: _____________________. 1.2 Location of the Project. A. The Project is located _____. B. The general location of the Project is shown on City Drawing No. _____. 1.3 Shared Cost Savings for Reductions in Contract Price; Value Engineering. [INSERT IF APPLICABLE; OTHERWISE, DELETE THIS SECTION] Should the cost of construction be less than the agreed upon Contract Price, then the savings shall be shared between the Contractor and the City. The Contractor shall receive twenty-five percent (25%) of any reductions realized in the Contract Price, and the City shall receive the remaining seventy- five percent (75%) of the savings. 1.4 Status of the Project Area and Rights-of-Way. A. City, at its expense, will provide all rights-of-way or permits, or both, covering the crossing of private property and public and private rights-of-way necessary for the permanent Work; provided, however, Contractor shall, at its expense, obtain any bonds or insurance policies or pay any fees and enter into any agreements required by a controlling authority, e.g., Caltrans or Union Pacific Railroad Company, before Contractor enters upon any property or right-of-way under the jurisdiction of any such controlling authority for the purpose of performing Work. B. City has acquired or is negotiating to acquire any rights-of-way, or both, necessary for the permanent Work. C. If such permits are required, all operations of Contractor shall conform to the restrictions, regulations, and requirements set forth in said permits, copies of which will be included in the Contract Documents. D. Contractor may be required, as a condition for receiving final payment, to obtain, and provide City’s Representative with copies of, executed damage releases from the owners of public and private property whose property has been damaged by the Work. The damage releases will be on a form provided by City. E. Contractor shall, also, as a condition for receiving final payment, obtain, and provide City’s Representative with copies of, executed damage releases from the owners of certain public and private property or areas which have been crossed by the Work or otherwise affected by the Work. The damage releases will be on a form provided by City. Page 563 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -85- 00 73 13 – SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1.5 Site Data. A. The data provided herein is for the information of Contractor and is subject to all limitations and conditions set forth in the Contract Documents. B. Subsurface Exploration Data. The following data are included in the Project Manual: 1. _____ C. Other Site Data. The following data are available for inspection at City’s office: 1. _____ Copies of these reports, drawings and other materials may be examined at City’s office during regular business hours. 1.6 Pre-Purchased or Pre-Negotiated Material. [NOT USED.] OR *** INSERT THIS PARAGRAPH WHEN CITY HAS PRE-PURCHASED OR PRE- NEGOTIATED PRICES FOR MATERIAL OR EQUIPMENT FOR INCORPORATION INTO THE PROJECT***] A. City has [**INSERT “pre-purchased” OR “pre-negotiated prices for”**] the following equipment and/or material to be incorporated into the Project:  ___  ___  ___ B. Contractor is responsible for coordination with manufacturer and complete installation of the equipment and/or material as if Contractor had purchased it directly. 1.7 Designation of City’s Representative. A. Unless otherwise modified by City, City’s Representative shall be ____________. 1.8 Modification of Hours of Work. [NOT USED.] OR Page 564 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -86- 00 73 13 – SPECIAL CONDITIONS ***INSERT PERMISSIBLE HOURS OF WORK IF NOT 7:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. M – F. CONSIDER ANY NOISE RESTRICTIONS FOR BLASTING OR CRUSHING AND ANY TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS FOR ROAD CLOSURES***] 1.9 Project Retention In accordance with Public Contract Code § 7201, City will withhold 5% of each progress payment as retention on the Project. [OR] In accordance with Public Contract Code § 7201, City has approved a finding that the Project is substantially complex and will withhold 10% of each progress payment as retention on the Project. A copy of City’s finding is attached as Attachment A to the Contract Documents. 1.10 Reverse Liquidated Damages Due to Unreasonable City Delay. A. In compliance with the provisions of California Public Contract Code § 7102, the Contractor will be compensated for damages incurred due to delays in completing the Work due solely to the fault of the City, where such delay is unreasonable under the circumstances and not contemplated by the parties and such delay is not the result of Additional Work. The Contractor and City agree that determining actual damages is impracticable and extremely difficult. As such, the Contractor shall be entitled to the appropriate time extension and to payment of liquidated damages in the sum of $[INSERT AMOUNT] per Day of delay in excess of the time specified for the Completion of the Work. Such amount shall constitute the only payment allowed and shall necessarily include all overhead (direct or indirect), all profit, all administrative costs, all bond costs, all labor, materials, equipment and rental costs, and any other costs, expenses and fees incurred or sustained as a result of such delay. The Contractor expressly agrees to be limited solely to the liquidated damages for all such delays as defined in this subsection. 1.11 Liquidated Damages Due to Contractor Delay. A. Time is of the essence. Should Contractor fail to complete all or any part of the Work within the time specified in the Contract Documents, City will suffer damage, the amount of which is difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain and, pursuant to the authority of Government Code section 53069.85, City shall therefore be entitled to $[INSERT AMOUNT] per Day as liquidated damages for each Day or part thereof that actual completion extends beyond the time specified. B. Liquidated damages may be deducted from progress payments due Contractor, Project retention or may be collected directly from Contractor, or from Contractor's surety. These provisions for liquidated damages shall not prevent City, in case of Contractor's default, from terminating the Contractor. Page 565 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -87- 00 73 13 – SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1.12 Utility Outages – Notices to Residents. A. Should Contractor’s operations require interruption of any utility service, Contractor shall notify City at least ten (10) Days prior to the scheduled outage. Contractor will notify all impacted residents on a form provided by City at least seven (7) Days prior to the scheduled outage. B. Contractor shall be responsible for providing, at its cost, any temporary utility or facilities necessitated by the utility outage. 1.13 Schedule Constraints. NOT USED. OR A. It is anticipated that the Contractor will be unable to [***INSERT SCOPE OF CONSTRAINT, FOR EXAMPLE “access the Site,” OR “perform certain construction activities”] because [INSERT SCHEDULE CONSTRAINTS SUCH AS NESTING PERIODS, TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS, COMMUNITY EVENTS IMPACTING SITE, ETC.***] on the following dates: [INSERT DATES] B. City has considered these Schedule Constraints when determining the Contract Times and no additional time or compensation will be added to the Contract due to these Constraints. 1.14 Noise Restrictions NOT USED. OR A. Contractor shall use only such equipment on the Work and in such state of repair so that the emission of sound therefrom is within the noise tolerance level of that equipment as established by Cal/OSHA. B. Contractor shall comply with the most restrictive of the following: (1) local sound control and noise level rules, regulations and ordinances and (2) the requirements contained in these Contract Documents, including hours of operation requirements. C. No internal combustion engine shall be operated on the Project without a muffler of the type recommended by the manufacturer. Should any muffler or other control device sustain damage or be determined to be ineffective or defective, the Contractor shall promptly remove the equipment and shall not return said equipment to the job until the device is repaired or replaced. Said noise and vibration level requirements shall apply to all equipment on the job or related to the job, including but not limited to, trucks, transit mixers or transit equipment that may or may not be owned by the Contractor. Page 566 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -88- 00 73 13 – SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR [***CITY TO INSERT SPECIFIC NOISE RESTRICTIONS, INCLUDING ANY RESTRICTIONS MANDATED BY PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT. RESTRICTIVE LANGUAGE SHOULD BE INCLUDED IF PROJECT AFFECTS RESIDENTIAL AREA ***] 1.15 Safety Programs. [NOT USED. OR A. In addition to all other safety requirements of the Contract Documents, Contractor must comply with [INSERT NAME OF SAFETY PROGRAM] at all times during the completion of the Work. B. City has considered these Safety Programs when determining the Contract Times and no additional time or compensation will be added to the Contract due to these Programs.] 1.16 Coordination with Other Contractors. NOT USED. OR A. In addition to the Contract requirements relating to other work at the Site, City anticipates that other contractors will be performing work within the Site. Specifically: [INSERT NAME OF CONTRACTOR (IF KNOWN), DATES OF WORK AND LOCATION OF WORK] B. City has considered these other contractors when determining the Contract Times and no additional time or compensation will be added to the Contract due to these other contractors. END OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS Page 567 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -89- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS PART 1 -- GENERAL 1.1 DESCRIPTION To be added 1.2 RELATED REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE PART 2 -- PRODUCTS (NOT USED) PART 3 -- EXECUTION 3.1 LAYOUT OF WORK AND QUANTITY SURVEYS General. The Contractor shall utilize a properly licensed surveyor to perform all layout surveys required for the control and completion of the Work, and all necessary surveys to compute quantities of Work performed. City and/or the Engineer of Record has established primary control to be used by the Contractor for establishing lines and grades required for the Work. Primary control consists of benchmarks and horizontal control points in the vicinity of the Work. A listing and identification of the primary control is provided on the Drawings. Before beginning any layout work or construction activity, the Contractor shall check and verify primary control, and shall advise the City Representative of any discrepancies. Quantity surveys. The Contractor shall perform such surveys and computations as are necessary to determine quantities of Work performed or placed during each progress payment period, and shall perform all surveys necessary for the City Representative to determine final quantities of Work in place. The City Representative will determine final quantities based upon the survey data provided by the Contractor, and the design lines and grades. If requested by the City Representative, the Contractor shall provide an electronic copy of data used for quantity computations. All surveys performed for measurement of final quantities of Work and material shall be subject to approval of City’s Representative. Unless waived by City’s Representative in each specific case, quantity surveys made by the Contractor shall be made in the presence of City’s Representative. Surveying Page 568 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -90- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Accuracy. Degree of accuracy shall be an order high enough to satisfy tolerances specified for the Work and the following: (a) Right-of-way and alignment of tangents and curves shall be within 0.1 foot. (b) Structure points shall be set within 0.01 foot, except where operational function of the special features or installation of metalwork and equipment require closer tolerances. When formwork has been placed and is ready for concrete, the Contractor shall check the formwork for conformance with the drawings and to ensure that the forms are sufficiently within the tolerance limits for the completed work. (c) Cross-section points shall be located within 0.1 foot, horizontally and vertically. (d) Aerial Mapping shall meet National Mapping Standards for 2-foot contour intervals. Records. Survey data shall be recorded in accordance with recognized professional surveying standards. Original field notes, computations, and other surveying data shall be recorded on electronic data collectors or in standard field books and must be of sufficient quality to enable the Contractor to prepare accurate record drawings as required by the Contract Documents. Cost. Unless otherwise called for by the Contract Documents, the cost of all material, equipment, and labor required for surveys for the layout of work and quantity surveys shall be included in the Schedule of Pay Items for items of work requiring the surveys. No additional compensation shall be made to the Contractor for this Work. 3.2 SCHEDULE Estimated Schedule. Within 14 Days after the issuance of the Notice to Proceed, Contractor shall prepare a Project schedule and shall submit this to the Engineer for Approval. The receipt or Approval of any schedules by the Engineer or the City shall not in any way relieve the Contractor of its obligations under the Contract Documents. The Contractor is fully responsible to determine and provide for any and all staffing and resources at levels which allow for good quality and timely completion of the Project. Contractor’s failure to incorporate all elements of Work required for the performance of the Contract or any inaccuracy in the schedule shall not excuse the Contractor from performing all Work required for a completed Project wit hin the specified Contract time period. If the required schedule is not received by the time the first payment under the Contract is due, Contractor shall not be paid until the schedule is received, reviewed and accepted by the Engineer. Schedule Contents. The schedule shall indicate the beginning and completion dates of all phases of construction; critical path for all critical, sequential time related activities; and “float time” for all “slack” or “gaps” in the non-critical activities. The schedule shall clearly identify all staffing and other resources which in the Contractor’s judgment are needed to complete the Project within the time specified for completion. The overall Project Schedule duration shall be within the Contract time. Page 569 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -91- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Schedule Updates. Contractor shall continuously update its construction schedule. Contractor shall submit an updated and accurate construction schedule to the Engineer monthly when requested to do so by Engineer. Contractor shall also submit schedules showing a three week detailed look-ahead at bi-weekly meetings conducted with the City. The Engineer may withhold progress payments or other amounts due under the Contract Documents if Contractor fails to submit an updated and accurate construction schedule. 3.3 TEMPORARY FIELD OFFICE NOT USED. OR Inspector’s Field Office. Contractor shall be responsible for providing the inspector’s field office. The office shall be a substantial waterproof construction with adequate natural light and ventilation by means of stock design windows. Door shall have a key type lock or padlock clasp. The office shall have heating and air conditioning and shall be equipped with a telephone, a telephone answering machine, high-speed internet connection, and a fax machine at Contractor’s expense. A table satisfactory for the study of plans and two chairs shall be provided by Contractor. Contractor shall provide and pay for adequate electric lights, local telephone service, and adequate heat and air conditioning for the field office until authorized removal. Utility Services. Contractor, at its expense, shall arrange for, develop and maintain all utilities, including but not limited to water, electric power, sewage disposal and telephone communications, at the Site to meet the requirements of the Work. Sanitation. The Contractor shall provide sanitary facilities for all persons working on the project. These facilities shall be kept clean and shall not be unsightly or produce odors. 3.4 PROTECTION OF WORK AND PROPERTY All traffic detector loops, fences, walls, culverts, property line monuments, or other obstructions (except property line monuments within five (5) feet of the centerline of the mains) which are removed, damaged, or destroyed in the course of the Work, shall be replaced or repaired to the original condition. If Contractor provides the City with reasonable notice of the need for such repair or replacement, it shall be performed by the City. If the Contractor fails to provide the City with reasonable notice, the repair or replacement shall be performed by and at the expense of the Contractor to the satisfaction of the City, whether or not those obstructions have been shown on the Plans, unless otherwise stated herein. It is then the Contractor’s responsibility to employ at its expense a Licensed Land Surveyor to restore all property line monuments located more than five (5) feet from the centerline of the mains, which are destroyed or obliterated. Property line monuments located within five (5) feet of the centerline of the mains will be replaced by the City at no expense to the Contractor, provided the City is notified at least 48 hours before the property line monuments are damaged. Page 570 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -92- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall provide such heat, covering, and enclosures as are necessary to protect all Work, materials, equipment, appliances, and tools against damage by weather conditions. Contractor shall take adequate precautions to protect existing sidewalks, curbs, pavements, utilities, and other adjoining property and structures, and to avoid damage thereto, and Contractor shall repair any damage thereto caused by the Work operations. Contractor shall: 1. Enclose the working area with a substantial barricade, and arrange work to cause minimum amount of inconvenience and danger to the public. 2. Provide substantial barricades around any shrubs or trees indicated to be preserved. 3. Deliver materials to the Project site over a route designated by the Engineer. 4. Provide any and all dust control required and follow the Applicable air quality regulations as appropriate. If the Contractor does not comply, the City shall have the immediate authority to provide dust control and deduct the cost from payments to the Contractor. 5. Confine Contractor’s apparatus, the storage of materials, and the operations of its workers to limits required by law, ordinances, permits, or directions of the Engineer. Contractor shall not unreasonably encumber the Project site with its materials. 6. Take care to prevent disturbing or covering any survey markers, monuments, or other devices marking property boundaries or corners. If such markers are disturbed by accident, they shall be replaced by a civil engineer or land surveyor acceptable to the City, at no cost to the City. 7. Ensure that existing facilities, fences and other structures are all adequately protected and that, upon completion of all Work, all facilities that may have been damaged are restored to a condition acceptable to the City. 8. Preserve and protect from injury all buildings, pole lines and all direction, warning and mileage signs that have been placed within the right-of-way. 9. At the completion of work each day, leave the Project site in a clean, safe condition. 10. Comply with any stage construction and traffic control plans. Access to residences and businesses shall be maintained at all times, unless otherwise permitted in writing by the City. These precautionary measures will apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours. Full compensation for the Work involved in the preservation of life, safety and property as above specified shall be considered as included in the prices Page 571 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -93- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS paid for the various contract items of Work, and no additional allowance will be made therefore. Should damage to persons or property occur as a result of the Work, Contractor shall be responsible for proper investigation, documentation, including video or photography, to adequately memorialize and make a record of what transpired. The City shall be entitled to inspect and copy any such documentation, video, or photographs. 3.5 SITE CONDITIONS SURVEYS Work Included. Contractor shall conduct thorough pre-construction and post-construction site condition surveys of the entire project area. Site Conditions surveys shall include written documentation of the conditions found, as well as photographs and video recordings of the area within at least 80 feet of any construction area and staging area. The written notes, photographs, and video shall be suitable for forensic purposes to resolve any damage claims that may arise as a result of construction. Submittals. 1. Written documentation of site condition survey at pre-construction and post- construction. 2. Photographs as described herein of pre-construction and post-construction conditions. 3. Video recordings as described herein of pre-construction and post-construction conditions. 4. Submittals shall be made within three days of the surveys. All post-construction data shall be submitted prior to the final project inspection. Site Condition Written Documentation. Written documentation shall include the time, date, and conditions under which the site survey was made. The documentation shall note the condition of structures, pavement, sidewalks, utilities, fences, and etc. within the work areas. Photographs. 1. General – Contractor shall take enough photographs during each site survey to provide a record of conditions existing prior to construction and conditions after construction. Pre-construction photographs shall be taken prior to any construction or mobilization of equipment, but not more that one week prior to actual start of work. The pre-construction photographs may be staged at different times to match the progression of the W ork. Page 572 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -94- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 2. The photographs shall document existing damage to public and private facilities, both prior to and after construction. Conditions to be documented include, but are not limited to: sidewalk cracks, broken curbs, separated property walls, improvements within public right-of-ways, access roads used, utility covers and markings, signs, pavement striping, pavement, unique or unusual conditions, adjacent driveways, landscaping, survey markers, and any feature directed by the Engineer. Private property that is adjacent to the public right-of-way shall be documented to the extent visible from the public right-of-way. 3. Photographs shall include items to indicate scale, as needed. In particular, scales or other items shall be laid next to close ups of structural cracks and other damaged areas being recorded. Scaling shall also be used to document elevation differences, as needed. 4. One set of color prints shall be submitted. Additional sets shall be available for reviewing in settling any construction disputes. A set of photos shall also be furnished in electronic format. The resolution shall be at least equal to 7 mega- pixels. All photos shall be documented as to time and date taken, photographer, project number, location, and orientation. Documentation shall include a brief description of objects photographed. Video Recording. 1. Video recordings shall document the conditions of the entire area affected by construction, as well as nearby structures and facilities. The general documentation requirements for videos are the same as for photographs. Video recorders shall accurately and continuously record the time and date. 2. Video recordings shall include an audio portion made simultaneously during the videoing. The audio recording shall describe the location, time, orientation, and objects being recorded. Special commentary shall be provided for unusual conditions or damage noted. 3. Video equipment shall be capable of producing high resolution images and shall have zoom capabilities. 4. Video recordings shall provide an overall picture of the sites and shall provide detailed images of damaged areas. Video shall extend to the maximum height of structures. 5. The Engineer shall have the right to reject any audio video recordings submitted with unintelligible audio, uncontrolled pan or zoom, or of poor quality. Video recordings shall be repeated when rejected. 6. Video recordings shall be submitted with labels indicating the project, date, recorder, and other pertinent information. Recordings shall be submitted on standard DVDs in a standard format. Timing. Page 573 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -95- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall provide written notice of the time scheduled for the site conditions survey and the place it is to begin. Contractor shall obtain the Engineer’s concurrence prior to beginning the condition survey. The Engineer reserves the right to cancel the survey due to weather conditions or other problems. Videoing shall be done during times of good visibility and no videoing or photography shall be done during periods of visible precipitation or when standing water obscures pavement. Contractor shall provide the Engineer with an opportunity to have a representative present when taking the photos and provide guidance during photographing. Site Surveyor. The site condition surveyor(s) shall be experienced in construction and potential damage concerns. The site condition surveyor(s) shall be familiar with the photography and video equipment being used. Field Quality Control. Prior to submitting videos and photographs, the Contractor shall spot check the photos and videos in the field to insure they accurately reflect the actual conditions and to insure they are correctly labeled. Soils Compaction Testing. 1. All soils compaction testing will be done by a licensed geotechnical engineer furnished by the City. Soils compaction testing will be done for all footings and foundations prior to placement of rebar or concrete. 2. For pipeline construction, soil compaction testing will be done at 100-foot intervals at the bottom of the trench prior to placement of pipe bedding; at the top of the pipe bedding above the pipe; every two vertical feet of trench backfill; at the top of the trench backfill, which sould be the bottom of the pavement section; and at the top of the aggregate base prior to pavement construction. 3.6 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MANUALS AND RECORD DRAWINGS General. The Contractor shall furnish all materials and perform all Work required for furnishing submittals to City in accordance with Contract Documents. Technical Manuals. 1. The Contractor shall submit technical operation and maintenance information for each item of mechanical, electrical and instrumentation equipment in an organized manner in the Technical Manual. It shall be written so that it can be used and understood by City’s operation and maintenance staff. 2. The Technical Manual shall be subdivided first by specification section number; second, by equipment item; and last, by "Category." "Categories" shall conform to the following (as applicable): (a) Category 1 - Equipment Summary: Page 574 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -96- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (1) Summary: A summary table shall indicate the equipment name, equipment number, and process area in which the equipment is installed. (b) Category 2 - Operational Procedures: (1) Procedures: Manufacturer-recommended procedures on the following shall be included in Part 2: a. Installation b. Adjustment c. Startup d. Location of controls, special tools, equipment required, or related instrumentation needed for operation e. Operation procedures f. Load changes g. Calibration h. Shutdown i. Troubleshooting j. Disassembly k. Reassembly l. Realignment m. Testing to determine performance efficiency n. Tabulation of proper settings for all pressure relief valves, low and high pressure switches, and other protection devices o. List of all electrical relay settings including alarm and contact settings (c) Category 3 - Preventive Maintenance Procedures: (1) Procedures: Preventive maintenance procedures shall include all manufacturer-recommended procedures to be performed on a periodic basis, both by removing and replacing the equipment or component, and by leaving the equipment in place. (2) Schedules: Recommended frequency of preventive maintenance procedures shall be included. Lubrication schedules, including lubricant SAE grade, type, and temperature ranges, shall be covered. Page 575 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -97- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (d) Category 4 - Parts List: (1) Parts List: A complete parts list shall be furnished, including a generic description and manufacturer's identification number for each part. Addresses and telephone numbers of the nearest supplier and parts warehouse shall be included. (2) Drawings: Cross-sectional or exploded view drawings shall accompany the parts list. (e) Category 5 - Wiring Diagrams: (1) Diagrams: Part 5 shall include complete internal and connection wiring diagrams for electrical equipment items. (f) Category 6 - Shop Drawings: (1) Drawings: This part shall include approved shop or fabrication drawings, complete with dimensions. (g) Category 7 - Safety: (1) Procedures: This part describes the safety precautions to be taken when operating and maintaining the equipment or working near it. (h) Category 8 - Documentation: (1) All equipment warranties, affidavits, and certifications required by the Technical Specifications shall be placed in this part. 3. The Contractor shall furnish to City six (6) identical Technical Manuals. Each set shall consist of one or more volumes, each of which shall be bound in a standard binder. Spare Parts List - The Contractor shall furnish to City six (6) identical sets of spare parts information for all mechanical, electrical, and instrumentation equipment. The spare parts list shall include the current list price of each spare part. The spare parts list shall include those spare parts which each manufacturer recommends be maintained by City in inventory. Each manufacturer or supplier shall indicate the name, address, and telephone number of its nearest outlet of spare parts to assist City in ordering. The Contractor shall cross-reference all spare parts lists to the equipment numbers designated in the Contract Documents. The spare parts lists shall be bound in standard size, 3-ring binder. Record Drawings 1. The Contractor shall maintain one record set of Drawings at the Site. On these, it shall mark all Project conditions, locations, configurations, and any other changes or deviations which may vary from the information represented in the original Contract Documents, including buried or concealed construction and utility Page 576 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -98- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS features which are revealed during the course of construction. Special attention shall be given to recording the horizontal and vertical location of all buried utilities that differ from the locations indicated, or which were not indicated on the Contract Drawings. Said record drawings shall be supplemented by any detailed sketches as necessary or directed to fully indicate the Work as actually constructed. These master record drawings of the as-built conditions, including all revisions made necessary by Addenda and Change Orders shall be maintained up-to-date during the progress of the Project. Red ink shall be used for alterations and notes. Notes shall identify relevant Change Orders by number and date. 2. For all Projects involving the installation of any pipeline, Contractor shall survey and record the top of the pipe at a minimum of every 100 linear feet, and at each bend, recording both the horizontal and vertical locations. 3. Record drawings shall be accessible to City’s Representative at all times during the construction period. Failure on the Contractor’s part to keep record drawings current could result in withholding partial payment. 4. Upon Completion of the Project and as a condition of final acceptance, the Contractor shall finalize and deliver a complete set of Record Drawings to City’s Representative. The information submitted by the Contractor will be assumed to be correct, and the Contractor shall be responsible for, and liable to City, for the accuracy of such information, and for any errors or omissions which may or may not appear on the Record Drawings. Cost. Unless otherwise called for by the Contract Documents, the cost of all material, equipment, and labor required to complete the Manuals and Record Drawings shall be included in the contract price and distributed in the Schedule of Pay. No additional compensation shall be made to the Contractor for this Work. 3.7 MATERIALS Materials to be Furnished by the Contractor 1. Inspection of Materials. Materials furnished by the Contractor which will become a part of the Project shall be subject to inspection at any one or more of the following locations, as determined by City’s Representative: at the place of production or manufacture, at the shipping point, or at the site of the Work. To allow sufficient time to provide for inspection, the Contractor shall submit to City’s Representative, at the time of issuance, copies of purchase orders or other written instrument confirming procurement of the materials, including drawings and other pertinent information, covering materials on which inspection will be made. 2. No later than fourteen (14) Days prior to manufacture of material, Contractor shall inform City’s Representative, in writing, the date the material is to be manufactured. 3. Contractors Obligations. The inspection of materials at any of the locations specified above or the waiving of the inspection thereof shall not impact whether Page 577 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -99- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS the materials and equipment conform to the Contract Documents. Contractor will not be relieved from furnishing materials meeting the requirements of the Contract Documents due to City’s inspection or lack of inspection of the equipment or materials. Acceptance of any materials will be made only after materials are installed in the Project. 4. Cost. Unless otherwise called for by the Contract Documents, the cost of all material, equipment, and labor required to accommodate City’s testing efforts, including any travel required by Contractor’s forces, shall be included in the contract price and distributed in the Schedule of Pay Items related to the materials requiring testing. No additional compensation shall be made to the Contractor for this Work. 3.8 LOCAL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS Access to Work and Haul Routes 1. General. All work on the rights-of-way necessary for access to the Site shall be performed by the Contractor. 2. Access, Damage, Restoration. The Contractor shall make his own investigation of the condition of available public or private roads and of clearances, restrictions, bridge-load limits, permit or bond requirements, and other limitations that affect or may affect transportation and ingress or egress at the Site. Claims for changes in Contract Price or Contract Times arising out of the unavailability of transportation facilities or limitations thereon shall not be considered by City. 3. The Contractor shall maintain and repair any damage arising out of Contractor’s operations to all roads used during construction of the Project, and upon completion of all Work, but prior to final acceptance, the roads shall be restored to their original condition. Prior to using any road for access to the Site, the Contractor shall conduct a photograph and/or video survey of the roadway with a copy submitted to City’s Representative. 4. Cost. Unless otherwise called for by the Contract Documents, the cost of all material, equipment, and labor required to complete this Work, shall be included in the contract price and distributed in the Schedule of Pay Items. No additional compensation shall be made to the Contractor for this Work. Power. Contractor shall provide at its own expense all necessary power required for operations under the contract. The Contractor shall provide and maintain in good order such modern equipment and installations as shall be adequate in the opinion of the Engineer to perform in a safe and satisfactory manner the Work required by the contract. Construction Water. 1. Construction water shall not be used for purposes other than those required to satisfactorily complete the contract. Page 578 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -100- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 2. All connections to the City's water system used for the purposes of obtaining construction water shall utilize a temporary construction meter and backflow prevention device supplied by the City. The City-furnished backflow prevention device shall be tested immediately after installation and the construction meter and backflow prevention device shall not be placed into service until the backflow prevention device passes such tests. Backflow prevention device testing shall be performed in accordance with applicable standards, and test results shall be provided to the Engineer. If the temporary construction meter and backflow prevention device are moved to alternate location(s) during construction, the backflow prevention device shall again be tested as described above immediately after re-installation. 3. For each temporary construction meter requested by the Contractor for the performance of work under this contract, an amount equivalent to the deposit requirement for temporary construction meters listed in the current approved version of the City’s Policies and Procedures Manual shall be withheld from the final contract payment until the temporary construction meters are returned. Operation of Existing Water Facilities 1. The Contractor shall not operate any of the existing water systems, including pumps, motors, and hydrants, but shall contact the City two (2) working days in advance with a list and location of the water system facilities that will require operating, opening, stopping, or closure by the City. 2. At the option of the Engineer, the Contractor may be permitted to operate valves for the purpose of making connections to existing mains. The City will perform all notification to existing customers regarding temporary loss of service. 3. Contractor shall submit a request on City’s standard form for any shut-down of existing water facilities. 4. [**INSERT CONTRACTOR’S NOTICE (DOOR HANGERS) REQUIREMENTS, IF ANY**]. Construction at Existing Utilities 1. General. Where the Work to be performed crosses or otherwise interferes with water, sewer, gas, or oil pipelines; buried cable; or other public or private utilities, the Contractor shall perform construction in such a manner so that no damage will result to either public or private utilities. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to determine the actual locations of, and make accommodates to maintain, all utilities. 2. Permission, Notice and Liability. Before any utility is taken out of service, permission shall be obtained by the Contractor from the owner. The owner, any impacted resident or business owner and the City Representative will be advised of the nature and duration of the utility outage as well as the Contractor’s plan for providing temporary utilities if required by the owner. The Contractor shall be liable Page 579 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -101- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS for all damage which may result from its failure to maintain utilities during the progress of the Work, and the Contractor shall indemnify City as required by the Contract Documents from all claims arising out of or connected with damage to utilities encountered during construction; damages resulting from disruption of service; and injury to persons or damage to property resulting from the negligent, accidental, or intentional breaching of utilities. 3. Cost. Unless otherwise called for by the Contract Documents, the cost of all material, equipment, and labor required to complete this Work, shall be included in the contract price and distributed in the Schedule of Pay Items. No additional compensation shall be made to the Contractor for this Work. Traffic Control 1. General. Contractor shall abide by traffic control plans approved by the appropriate jurisdiction. 2. Protections. Roads subject to interference by the Work shall be kept open or suitable temporary passages through the Work shall be provided and maintained by the Contractor. The Contractor shall provide, erect, and maintain all necessary barricades, suitable and sufficient flasher lights, flag persons, danger signals, and signs, and shall take all necessary precautions for the protection of the Work and the safety of the public. No construction work along public or private roads may proceed until the Contractor has proper barricades, flasher lights, flag persons, signals, and signs in place at the construction site. 3. Cost. Unless otherwise called for by the Contract Documents, the cost of all material, equipment, and labor required to complete this Work, shall be included in the contract price and distributed in the Schedule of Pay Items. No additional compensation shall be made to the Contractor for this Work. Cleaning Up 1. Contractor at all times shall keep premises free from debris such as waste, rubbish, and excess materials and equipment. Contractor shall not store debris under, in, or about the premises. Contractor shall also clean all asphalt and concrete areas to the degree necessary to remove oil, grease, fuel, or other stains caused by Contractor operations or equipment. The use of water, resulting in mud on streets, will not be permitted as substitute for sweeping or other methods. Dust control may require having a water truck onsite for the duration of the project, and/or use of temporary hoses and pipelines to convey water. 2. Contractor shall fully clean up the site at the completion of the Work. If the Contractor fails to immediately clean up at the completion of the Work, the City may do so and the cost of such clean up shall be charged back to the Contractor. 3.9 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PROTECTION Environmental Conditions Page 580 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -102- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS NOT USED. OR 1. Contractor must comply with all applicable environmental laws, Project conditions, and constraints, including, but not limited to: [LIST ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS AND PERMITS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT] 2. City has considered these Environmental Conditions when determining the Contract Times and no additional time or compensation will be added to the Contract due to these Conditions. Landscape and Vegetation Preservation 1. General. The Contractor shall exercise care to preserve the natural landscape and vegetation, and shall conduct operations so as to prevent unnecessary destruction, scarring, or defacing of the natural surroundings in the vicinity of the Work. 2. Damage and Restoration. Movement of crews and equipment within the rights-of- way and over routes provided for access to the Work shall be performed in a manner to prevent damage to property. When no longer required, construction roads shall be restored to original contours. 3. Upon completion of the Work, and following removal of construction facilities and required cleanup, land used for construction purposes and not required for the completed installation shall be scarified and regraded, as required, so that all surfaces are left in a condition that will facilitate natural revegetation, provide for proper drainage, and prevent erosion. 4. Cost. Unless otherwise called for by the Contract Documents, the cost of all material, equipment, and labor required to complete this Work, shall be included in the contract price and distributed in the Schedule of Pay Items. No additional compensation shall be made to the Contractor for this Work. Protected Species 1. General. If, in the performance of the Work, evidence of the possible occurrence of any Federally listed threatened or endangered plant or animal is discovered, the Contractor shall notify the City Representative immediately, giving the location and nature of the findings. Written confirmation of the evidence, location and nature of the findings shall be forwarded to City within 2 Days. 2. Procedures. The Contractor shall immediately cease all construction activities in the immediate area of the discovery to the extent necessary to protect the endangered plant or animal. Page 581 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -103- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS If directed by the City Representative, Contractor will refrain from working in the immediate area, suspend the Work in its entirety, or alter its performance to ensure full compliance with all applicable permits, laws and regulations. Any City directed changes to the Work as a result of a siting will be pursuant to the Contract Documents. 3. False Siting. Any costs or delays incurred by City or the Contractor due to unreasonable or false notification of an endangered plant or animal will be borne by the Contractor. 4. Cost. Unless otherwise called for by the Contract Documents, the cost of all material, equipment, and labor required to comply with this paragraph, shall be included in the contract price and distributed in the Schedule of Pay Items. No additional compensation shall be made to the Contractor for this Work. Preservation of Historical and Archeological Resources 1. General. If, in the performance of the Work, Contractor should unearth cultural resources (for example, human remains, animal bones, stone tools, artifacts and/or midden deposits) through excavation, grading, watering or other means, the Contractor notify the Construction/Archeological Monitor and/or the City Representative immediately, giving the location and nature of the findings. Written confirmation of the evidence, location and nature of the findings shall be forwarded to the Construction/Archeological Monitor and/or City within 2 Days. 2. Procedures. The Contractor shall immediately cease all construction activities in the immediate area of the discovery to the extent necessary to protect the cultural resource. If directed by the City Representative, Contractor will refrain from working in the immediate area, suspend the Work in its entirety, or re-sequence and/or alter its performance to ensure full compliance with all applicable permits, laws and regulations. Should the presence of cultural resources be confirmed, the Contractor will assist the City Representative and the Construction/Archeological Monitor in the preparation and implementation of a data recovery plan. The Contractor shall provide such cooperation and assistance as may be necessary to preserve the cultural resources for removal or other disposition. Any City directed changes to the Work as a result of the cultural resource will be pursuant to the Contract Documents. 3. Contractor’s Liability. Should Contractor, without permission, injure, destroy, excavate, appropriate, or remove any cultural resource on or adjacent to the Site, it will be subject to disciplinary action, arrest and penalty under applicable law. The Contractor shall be principally responsible for all costs of mitigation and/or restoration of cultural resources related to the unauthorized actions identified above. Contractor shall be required to pay for unauthorized damage and mitigation costs to cultural resources (historical and archeological resources) as a result of unauthorized activities that damage cultural resources and shall indemnify City pursuant to the Contract Documents. Page 582 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -104- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 4. Cost. Unless otherwise called for by the Contract Documents, the cost of all material, equipment, and labor required to comply with this paragraph, shall be included in the contract price and distributed in the Schedule of Pay Items. No additional compensation shall be made to the Contractor for this Work. Dust and Pollution Control 1. Contractor shall provide all necessary material, equipment and labor to prevent and control the emission of dust and any other potential pollutant on site. 2. Contractor shall not discharge into the atmosphere from any source smoke, dust or other air contaminants in violation of the law, rules, and regulations of the governing agency. 3. Cost. Unless otherwise called for by the Contract Documents, the cost of all material, equipment, and labor required to comply with this paragraph, shall be included in the contract price and distributed in the Schedule of Pay Items. No additional compensation shall be made to the Contractor for this Work. Fugitive Dust NOT USED. OR 1. In addition to all other environmental and air quality requirements of the Contract Documents, Contractor must also comply with the most recent version of any rules implemented by the Air Quality Management City (AQMD) with jurisdiction over the Project in order to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air as a result of the Project. All equipment shall be AQMD compliant and permitted, as needed. 2. City has considered these other requirements when determining the Contract Times and no additional time or compensation will be added to the Contract due to these requirements. Management of Storm, Surface and Other Waters 1. Storm water, surface water, groundwater, and nuisance, or other waters may be encountered at various times during construction of the Project. Federal and State laws require the City and its contractors to manage such waters pursuant to the requirements of California State Water Resources Control Board Order Number 2009-0009-DWQ, the Federal Clean Water Act, and the California Porter Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Contractor acknowledges that it has investigated the risk arising from such waters in conjunction with the Project, and assumes any and all risks and liabilities arising therefrom. 2. The Contractor shall perform all construction operations in such a manner as to comply, and ensure all subcontractors to comply, with all applicable Federal, Page 583 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -105- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS State, and local laws, orders, and regulations concerning the control and abatement of water pollution; and all terms and conditions of any applicable permits issued for the Project. In the event there is a conflict between Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and requirements, the most stringent shall apply. 3. Contractor violations. If noncompliance should occur, the Contractor shall report this to the City Representative immediately, with the specific information submitted in writing within 2 Days. Consistent violations of applicable Federal, State, or local laws, orders, regulations, or Water Quality Standards may result in City stopping all site activity until compliance is ensured. The Contractor shall not be entitled to any change in Contract Price or Contract Times, claim for damage, or additional compensation by reason of such a work stoppage. Corrective measures required to bring activities into compliance shall be at the Contractor's expense. 4. Compliance with Construction General Storm water Permit. Contractor shall be required to comply with all aspects of the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) Water Quality Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity (Permit) for all projects that involve construction on or disturbance of one acre or more of land or which are part of a larger common area of development. (a) Contractor shall prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the Project site based on the appropriate Risk Level requirements, and draft and coordinate submittal of all Permit related documents with City’s Legally Responsible Person and/or Authorized Signatory as those terms are defined in the Permit. The Contractor shall submit the SWPPP to the City Representative for review not less than fifteen (15) Days prior to the start of on- site construction work. City will file the Notice of Intent and pay the filing fee. (b) The SWPPP shall be developed by a Qualified SWPPP Developer and implemented by a Qualified SWPPP Practitioner as those terms are defined in the Permit and shall include industry standard requirements for water quality control including but not be limited to the following: (1) Sediment and erosion control measures to manage sediment and erosion including vegetative practices, structural control, silt fences, straw dikes, sediment controls or operator controls as appropriate. Storm water management measures shall be instituted as required, including velocity dissipaters, and solid waste controls shall address controls for building materials and offsite tracking of sediment. (2) Wastewater and storm water management controls to divert offsite surface flows around the Project site and to divert surface flows within the Project area away from areas of open earth or stockpiles of building and other materials. Wastewater from general construction activities, such as drain water collection, aggregate processing, concrete batching, drilling, grouting, or other construction operations, shall not enter flowing or dry watercourses without having met the authorized non-storm water Page 584 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -106- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS discharge requirements listed in State Board Water Quality Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, Section III.C., including proper notification to the Regional Water Board. (3) Pollution prevention measures including methods of dewatering, unwatering, excavating, or stockpiling earth and rock materials which include prevention measures to control silting and erosion, and which will intercept and settle any runoff of sediment-laden waters. (4) Turbidity prevention measures for prevention of excess turbidity including, but are not restricted to, intercepting ditches, settling ponds, gravel filter entrapment dikes, flocculating processes, recirculation, combinations thereof, or other approved methods that are not harmful to aquatic life. All such wastewaters discharged into surface waters, shall contain the least concentration of settleable material possible, and shall meet all conditions of section 402, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. (5) Overall construction site management measures to address changes at the Project site as the Project moves through different phases and changes that account for rainy and dry season management practices. (6) Pollution control measures and construction activity methods that will prevent entrance, or accidental spillage, of solid matter, contaminants, debris, or other pollutants or wastes, into streams, flowing or dry watercourses, lakes, wetlands, reservoirs, or underground water sources. Such pollutants and wastes include, but are not restricted to: refuse, garbage, cement, sanitary waste, industrial waste, hazardous materials, radioactive substances, oil and other petroleum products, aggregate processing, tailings, mineral salts, and thermal pollution. (7) Control measures for stockpiled or deposited materials prohibiting the stockpile or deposit of excavated materials, or other construction materials, near or on stream banks, lake shorelines, or other watercourse perimeters where they can be washed away by high water or storm runoff, or can, in any way, encroach upon the watercourse. (8) Develop and implement a Rain Event Action Plan (REAP), if required, that must be designed and implemented to protect all exposed portions of the site 48 hours prior to any likely precipitation event. (9) Monitoring, reporting and record keeping, as necessary to achieve compliance with applicable Permit requirements, including but not limited to annual reports and rain event reports. (c) Before any Permit related documents, including the SWPPP, rain event reports, or annual reports may be submitted to the State Board or implemented on the Project site, they must first be reviewed and approved by City. (d) City retains the right to procure and maintain coverage under the Permit for the Project site if the Contractor fails to draft a SWPPP or other Permit related Page 585 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -107- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS document, or fails to proceed in a manner that is satisfactory to City. City reserves the right to implement its own SWPPP at the Project site, and hire additional contractors to maintain compliance. Whether Contractor has adequately maintained compliance with the Permit shall be City’s sole determination. In the event that Contractor has failed or is unable to maintain compliance with the Permit, any costs or fines incurred by City in implementing a SWPPP, or otherwise maintaining compliance with the Construction General Permit shall be paid by the Contractor. (e) Failure to implement the SWPPP or otherwise comply with the Permit is a violation of federal and state law. Contractor hereby agrees to indemnify City as required by the Contract Documents for any noncompliance or alleged noncompliance with the Permit arising out of or in connection with the Project, except for liability resulting from the sole established negligence, willful misconduct or active negligence of City. City may seek damages from Contractor for delay in completing the Contract in accordance with the Contract Documents, caused by Contractor’s failure to comply with the Permit. 5. In addition to compliance with the Permit, Contractor shall comply with the lawful requirements of any applicable municipality, district, drainage district, flood control district, and other local agencies regarding discharges of storm water, surface water, groundwater or other nuisance waters off of the Project site. 6. Oil storage tanks management. (a) Storage tank placement. All oil or other petroleum product (hereinafter referred to collectively as oil) storage tanks shall be placed at least 20 feet from streams, flowing or dry watercourses, lakes, wetlands, reservoirs, and any other water source. (b) Storage area dikes. Storage areas shall be diked at least 12 inches high or graded and sloped to permit safe containment of leaks and spills equal to the capacity of all tanks and/or containers located within each area, plus a sufficient amount of freeboard to contain the 25-year rainstorm. (c) Diked area barriers. Diked areas shall have an impermeable barrier at least 10 mils thick. Areas used for refueling operations shall have an impermeable liner at least 10 mils thick buried under 2 to 4 inches of soil. (d) Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC). Where the location of a construction site is such that oil from an accidental spillage could reasonably be expected to enter into or upon the navigable waters of the United States or adjoining shorelines, and the aggregate storage of oil at the site is over 1,320 gallons or a single container has a capacity in excess of 660 gallons, the Contractor shall prepare an SPCC Plan. The Contractor shall submit the SPCC Plan to the Engineer at least 30 days prior to delivery or storage of oil at the site. The Plan must have been reviewed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with 40 C.F.R., part 112 7. Underground tank prohibition. The Contractor shall not use underground storage tanks. Page 586 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) -108- 01 00 00 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 8. Construction safety standards. The Contractor shall comply with the sanitation and potable water requirements of Section 7 of United States Bureau of Reclamation's publication “Reclamation Safety And Health Standards.” 9. Other Permits. (a) Other permits applicable to the Project are listed in the Special Conditions. The Contractor shall obtain all other necessary licenses and permits. (b) Monitoring. The Contractor is required to conduct monitoring in order to meet the requirements of the permits, which may include sampling, testing and inspections. (c) Recordkeeping. The Contractor shall retain all records and data required by the permits for the time specified in the contract. 10. Cost. Except as specified herein, the cost of complying with this section shall be included in the Schedule of Pay Items for work which necessitate the water pollution prevention measures required by this paragraph. END OF GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Page 587 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) - 1 - EXHIBIT “A” Change Order Form EXHIBIT “A” CHANGE ORDER FORM City of Hermosa Beach Contract Change Order # Project: Change Order No.: Orig. Contract Amt.: $ Days Contract No.: Contractor: Prev. Appvd. Changes: $ Days Owner: City of Hermosa Beach This Change: $ Days Revised Contract Amt.: $ Days This Change Order covers changes to the subject contract as described herein. The Contractor shall construct, furnish equipment and materials, and perform all work as necessary or required to complete the Change Order items for a lump sum price agreed upon between the Contractor and City of Hermosa Beach, otherwise referred to as Owner. Item No. Description of Changes Increase/ (Decrease) in Contract Amount Contract Time Extension, Days 1 2 Totals $ This Contract Change Order consists of 2 pages and any exhibits attached to this Contract Change Order shall not be part of the Contract Change Order unless specifically initialed by or on behalf of both the Contractor and the City of Hermosa Beach. Contract Change Order # Page 1 of 2 [Agency Address] Page 588 of 1339 65270.00021\44496819.1 City of Hermosa Beach BBK (01/2026) - 2 - EXHIBIT “A” Change Order Form The amount of the contract will be increased by the sum of $ and the contract time shall be extended by working days. The undersigned Contractor approves the foregoing Change Order # as to the changes, if any, in the contract price specified for each item including any and all supervision costs and other miscellaneous costs relating to the change in work, and as to the extension of time allowed, if any, for completion of the entire work on account of said Change Order #. The Contractor agrees to furnish all labor and materials and perform all other necessary work, inclusive of the directly or indirectly related to the approved time extension, required to complete the Change order items. This document will become a supplement of the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. It is understood that the Change Order shall be effective when approved by the Owner. Contractor accepts the terms and conditions stated above as full and final settlement of any and all claims arising out of or related to the subject of this Change Order and acknowledges that the compensation (time and cost) set forth herein comprises the total compensation due for the work or change defined in the Change Order, including all impact on any unchanged work. By signing this Change Order, the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the stipulated compensation includes payment for all Work contained in the Change Order, plus all payment for any acceleration or interruption of schedules, extended overhead costs, delay, and all impact or cumulative impact on all Work under this Contract. The signing of this Change Order acknowledges full mutual accord and satisfaction for the change and that the stated time and/or cost constitute the total equitable adjustment owed the Contractor as a result of the change. The Contractor hereby releases and agrees to waive all rights, without exception or reservation of any kind whatsoever, to file any further claim or request for equitable adjustment of any type, for any reasonably foreseeable cause that shall arise out of, or as a result of, this Change Order and/or its impact on the remainder of the Work under the Contract. Accepted: (Signature) Contractor’s Authorized Representative Date Recommended: (Signature) [**INSERT NAME, TITLE**] Date Approved: (Signature) [**INSERT NAME, TITLE**] Date Item No. Justification for Change(s) 1 2 This Contract Change Order consists of 2 pages and any exhibits attached to this Contract Change Order shall not be part of the Contract Change Order unless specifically initialed by or on behalf of both the Contractor and the City of Hermosa Beach. Contract Change Order # Page 2 of 2 Page 589 of 1339 Page 1 of 4 RES NO. 26-XXXX CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESOLUTION NO. 26-XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NUMBER 619 (“CIP 619”) KELLY COURTS IMPROVEMENTS, AWARDING A PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT, AND ESTABLISHING A PROJECT PAYMENT ACCOUNT WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) has the authority to implement actions for the protection of public health, safety, and welfare (to include the construction, maintenance, and improvement of public recreational facilities and related infrastructure) pursuant to the California Constitution (Section 7 to Article XI) and California Government Code sections 37350 et seq.; and WHEREAS, the City Council (“Council”) award of a contract and all of the acts leading up to the award are legislative in character, and the letting of contracts by the Council necessarily requires an exercise of discretion guided by consideration of the public welfare (Mike Moore's 24-Hour Towing v. City of San Diego (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1294, 1303); and WHEREAS, competitive bidding is not applicable “where competitive proposals work an incongruity and are unavailing as affecting the final result, or where competitive proposals do not produce any advantage, or where it is practically impossible to obtain what is required and to observe such form” (Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment Agency (1980) 104 Cal.App. 3d 631, 636); and WHEREAS, where an existing contract permits the Council to complete its work and deduct the cost thereof from that contract, the Council may do so without further competitive bidding (Shore v. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (1962) 208 Cal.App.2d 465, 470 (“[u]nder such circumstances, there was clearly no possibility of loss to the taxpayers”)); and WHEREAS, the existing pavement conditions at the tennis and pickleball courts were discovered to consist of approximately two (2) inches of deteriorated asphalt overlaying two (2) inches of concrete during the course of construction, which constituted unforeseen site conditions requiring specialized resurfacing methods; and Page 590 of 1339 Page 2 of 4 RES NO. 26-XXXX WHEREAS, all scope under the original construction contract except for the resurfacing and striping of the tennis and pickleball courts has been substantially completed; and WHEREAS, City staff solicited and evaluated proposals from multiple qualified contractors and determined that GR Paving Solutions (“GR Paving”) submitted the proposal offering the most suitable combination of repair methodology, materials, durability, and cost effectiveness; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to award the construction contract to GR Paving Solutions for the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. California Labor Code (“Labor Code”) Compliance. The Council hereby finds that the Project is a “public works” project subject to Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq., including prevailing wage requirements under Section 1773 and contractor registration requirements under Section 1725.5. As such, the Project shall comply with all applicable labor laws including but not limited to the following: (a) prevailing wage requirements (Labor Code Sections 1770-1773); (b) contractor registration (Labor Code Section 1725.5); and (c) apprenticeship requirements (Labor Code Section 1777.5). SECTION 3. Approval and Authorization. The Council hereby approves and authorizes the following: a. Approval of Plans and Specifications. The plans and specifications for the Project are approved conferring design immunity pursuant to California Government Code Section 830.6. b. Award of Contract. The Council awards the construction contract for the Project to GR Paving Solutions in the amount of one hundred six thousand, six hundred fifty dollars ($106,650). c. Authorization of Contingency. The Director of Public Works is authorized to establish a Project contingency in an amount not to exceed twenty-six thousand, six hundred sixty-three dollars ($26,663) (approximately twenty-five percent (25%)); and to approve change orders within such contingency amount consistent with applicable law. Page 591 of 1339 Page 3 of 4 RES NO. 26-XXXX d. Contract Execution Authority. The City Manager is authorized to execute the construction contract and any necessary amendments or related documents, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. e. Project Payment Account. The Council establishes an account containing sufficient monies from the current fiscal year budget to pay for the Project. This account shall be funded through the Capital Improvement Fund, and shall be the sole source of funds available for the construction sum as defined in the contract documents administering the Project. f. Notice of Completion. The Director of Public Works is authorized to file a Notice of Completion upon final complet ion of the Project pursuant to applicable law. SECTION 4. Design Immunity. The approval and authorization granted by this Resolution is intended to avail the City and the City’s delegated officers of the immunities set forth in California Government Code Section 830.6 with regards to the plans and construction of the Project. The City Engineer finds that the plans are complete and the Project may be constructed. The Council specifically finds the following: a. The design and plans for the Project are determined to be consistent with the City’s standards and are approved. b. The design approval set forth in this Resolution occurred before actual work on the Project construction commenced. c. The approval granted by this Resolution conforms with the City’s General Plan. d. The City Engineer, or designee, is authorized to act on the City’s behalf in approving any alterations or modifications of the design and plans approved by this Resolution. SECTION 5. California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The Council finds that this Resolution is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Sections 15301 (the proposed work is a minor alteration of existing public structures or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing use) and 15302 (the proposed work consists of reconstruction of existing court structures where the new courts will be located on the same site as the structure replaced, and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced). SECTION 6. Severability. If any section or provision of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or Page 592 of 1339 Page 4 of 4 RES NO. 26-XXXX provisions of this Resolution shall remain valid. The Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation. SECTION 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City; and make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the Council in the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 26th day of May 2026. Mayor Mike Detoy PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ ________________________________ Martha Alvarez Jason Baltimore City Clerk Interim City Attorney Page 593 of 1339 Quote #158101-R1 Date: 05/04/2026 GR Paving Solutions – 399 W Mission Blvd - Suite A, Pomona, CA 91766 Phone: (877) 299-1440 Web: GRPavingSolutions.com Page 1 of 2 COST BREAKDOWN Kelly Courts Hermosa Beach, CA CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Mr. Kristian Alarcon City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Thank you for giving GR Paving Solutions the opportunity to submit the following proposal for the described work Item# Activity UNIT SCOPE DURATION Total 1 • Remove a Section of Existing Fence for a Temporary Construction Access • Demolition of Existing AC surface (2” thick) and haul-out all debris (including dump fees) • Resurfacing the Existing PCC Surface, by Filling all Cracks and Patch where needed • Install non-woven polypropylene paving fabric (Petromat or approved equal) • Construct 2” AC Paving (3/8” fine) over Existing surface S.F. ±14,400 5 Days (One Phase) $ 87,150 2 • Applying Resurfacing Material (2 coats) per SportMaster specifications • Apply (2 coats) of paint per SportMaster specifications and per approved plans S.F. ±14,400 2 Day (One Phase) $ 19,500 Totals $ 106,650 Grand Total $ 106,650 Exclusions: Survey, Engineering, Permits and Fees, Inspection Fees, Utility Fees, Traffic Control Plan, Signage & Striping Page 594 of 1339 Quote #158101-R1 Date: 05/04/2026 GR Paving Solutions – 399 W Mission Blvd - Suite A, Pomona, CA 91766 Phone: (877) 299-1440 Web: GRPavingSolutions.com Page 2 of 2 Warranties: All materials & labor used are covered by one year manufacture warranty for materials, and one year labor warranty by GR Paving Solutions. Should you find this proposal acceptable to you and wish to proceed accordingly, please arrange for the issuance of a Purchase Order at your earliest convenience and return a signed copy of this proposal to our office. This should serve as our contract for this phase of the project and the authorization to proceed with the work. We are pleased with the opportunity and look forward to providing you with excellent service. Respectfully, George Rizkalla, Ph.D. President O: (877) 299-1440 X 701 C: (626) 827-1729 & (435) 236-2671 george@grpavingsolutions.com GR PAVING SOLUTIONS ACCEPTED AND AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED By: ______________________________________ (Authorized Signature) Date: ______________________________________ Page 595 of 1339 EBxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxEBxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxx xx xx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxU. S. A. 9 2 6 6 0 N E W P O R T B E A C H , CA 2 0 2 5 0 S W A C A C I A S T , S T E 2 6 0 P H : 7 1 4 .7 5 4 .7 3 1 1 N E W P O R T B E A C H , CA 2 0 2 5 0 S W A C A C I A S T , S T E 2 6 0 P H : 7 1 4 .7 5 4 .7 3 1 1 U. S. A. 9 2 6 6 0 Underground Service Alert of Southern California Know what's below. before you dig.Call R TENNIS COURT LAYOUT ENLARGEMENT- COLOR SCALE: NTS1BASKETBALL COURT ENLARGEMENT - COLOR SCALE: NTS2 1.BASKETBALL BACKBOARD, UPRIGHT, RING & NET SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FROM COAST RECREATION, INC, 714-619-0100 OR AN APPROVED EQUAL 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL USE SPORTMASTER OR APPROVED EQUAL COLOR COATING SYSTEM TO FILL/PATCH CRACKS, RESURFACE, AND PAINT BASKETBALL COURTS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT COURT AS SHOWN USING 'SPORTMASTER' PAINT OR APPROVED EQUAL. COLOR OF PAINT SHALL BE FOREST GREEN AND BLUE. REFER TO PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF EACH. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT LINES WITH 'TEXTURED' WHITE LINE PAINT. 5.PAINTS ARE AVAILABLE FROM SPORT MASTER SPORT SURFACES800-395-7325 OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COLOR SAMPLES TO ENGINEER FOR REVIEW & APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL WORK PERTAINING TO PAINTING SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 7.ALL EXISTING CONCRETE PAVING SHALL BE RESURFACED AND ALL CRACKS SHALL BE FILLED/PATCHED PER SPECIFICATIONS. NO PAINT SHALL BE ADDED TO EXISTING CONCRETE OUTSIDE OF BASKETBALL PLAYING SURFACE. BASKETBALL PLAYING SURFACE SHALL RECEIVE PAINT PER PLAN. 8.EXISTING COURT PAINT AND STRIPING SHALL BE STRIPPED WITH A SANDING/GRINDING OR HYDROBLASTING METHOD. 9.DIMENSIONS AND COLOR NOTED ON EACH COURT ARE A MIRROR IMAGE OF EACH OTHER . 10.EQ. DENOTES EQUAL. CL DENOTES CENTER LINE. TYP DENOTES TYPICAL 11.COURTS ARE DRAWN TO BE HIGH SCHOOL STANDARD, IF ANY DISCREPANCIES SHOULD ARISE, FOLLOW HIGH SCHOOL BASKETBALL STANDARDS DIMENSIONS. 12.EXISTING BACKBOARD UPRIGHTS AND FOOTINGS SHALL BE REMOVED AS PART OF THE DEMOLITION PROCESS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE VOID TO 95% WITH STRUCTURAL SOIL AND FINISH TO SURFACE PER DETAIL 2, SHEET C-7.2. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDED LAYOUT DIMENSIONS TO CITY ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONCRETE PAVING PAINT COLOR SHALL BE: FOREST GREEN CONCRETE PAVING PAINT COLOR SHALL BE: BLUE NOTES: 2 3 CONCRETE PAVING PAINT COLOR SHALL BE: FOREST GREEN CONCRETE PAVING PAINT COLOR SHALL BE: BLUE 2 3 NOTES: 1.CONCRETE COLOR SHALL BE AS NOTED. 2.TENNIS POST, NET, AND CENTER STRAP ANCHOR SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL USE SPORTMASTER OR APPROVED EQUAL COLOR COATING SYSTEM TO FILL/PATCH CRACKS, RESURFACE, AND PAINT TENNIS COURTS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT COURT AS SHOWN USING 'SPORTMASTER' PAINT OR APPROVED EQUAL. COLOR OF PAINT SHALL BE FOREST GREEN AND BLUE. REFER TO PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF EACH. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT LINES WITH 'TEXTURED' WHITE LINE PAINT. 5.PAINTS ARE AVAILABLE FROM SPORT MASTER SPORT SURFACES 800-395-7325 OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COLOR SAMPLES TO ENGINEER FOR REVIEW & APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL WORK PERTAINING TO PAINTING SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 7.EXISTING COURT PAINT AND STRIPING SHALL BE STRIPPED WITH A SANDING/GRINDING OR HYDROBLASTING METHOD. 8.TENNIS COURT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FOR A DOUBLES AND SINGLES COURT. 9.EXISTING TENNIS COURT POST, ANCHORS AND FOOTINGS SHALL BE REMOVED AS PART OF THE DEMOLITION PROCESS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE VOID TO 95% WITH STRUCTURAL SOIL AND FINISH TO SURFACE PER DETAIL 2, SHEET C-7.2. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDED LAYOUT DIMENSIONS TO CITY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. C IT Y O F H ERMOSA BEACH, CA1907N 2 TYP. 2 TYP.22 2 2 TYP. 33 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 TYP. 2 TYP. 2 TYP. 2 TYP. 2 TYP. 2 TYP. 2 TYP. 22 3 3 3 3 2 TYP. 2 TYP. 2 TYP. 2 TYP. 6 'TEXTURED' WHITE LINE PAINT- REFER TO TENNIS COURT PLAYING LINE LAYOUT PLAN BELOW 5 5 5 6 6 TYP. 'TEXTURED' WHITE LINE PAINT REFER TO NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS 6 6 6 TYP. TYP. TYP. EXISTING TRENCH DRAIN Page 596 of 1339 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxU. S. A. 9 2 6 6 0 N E W P O R T B E A C H , CA 2 0 2 5 0 S W A C A C I A S T , S T E 2 6 0 P H : 7 1 4 .7 5 4 .7 3 1 1 N E W P O R T B E A C H , CA 2 0 2 5 0 S W A C A C I A S T , S T E 2 6 0 P H : 7 1 4 .7 5 4 .7 3 1 1 U. S. A. 9 2 6 6 0 Underground Service Alert of Southern California Know what's below. before you dig.Call R C IT Y O F H ERMOSA BEACH, CA1907N PICKLEBALL COURT - COLOR SCALE: NTS2 CONCRETE PAVING PAINT COLOR SHALL BE: FOREST GREEN CONCRETE PAVING PAINT COLOR SHALL BE: BLUE 'TEXTURED' WHITE LINE PAINT 2 3 6 NOTES: 1.CONCRETE COLOR SHALL BE AS NOTED. 2.PICKLEBALL POST, NET, AND CENTER STRAP ANCHOR SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL USE SPORTMASTER OR APPROVED EQUAL, COLOR COATING SYSTEM TO FILL/PATCH CRACKS, RESURFACE, AND PAINT PICKLEBALL COURTS. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT COURT AS SHOWN USING 'SPORTMASTER' PAINT OR APPROVED EQUAL. COLOR OF PAINT SHALL BE FOREST GREEN AND BLUE. REFER TO PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF EACH. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT LINES WITH 'TEXTURED' WHITE LINE PAINT. 6.PAINTS ARE AVAILABLE FROM SPORT MASTER SPORT SURFACES 800-395-7325 OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COLOR SAMPLES TO ENGINEER FOR REVIEW & APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL WORK PERTAINING TO PAINTING SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 8.CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE/FILL CONCRETE HOLES FROM DEMOLISHED POLES AND CENTER ANCHOR AND TREAT PER SPORTMASTER SPECIFICATIONS. 9.EXISTING COURT PAINT AND STRIPING SHALL BE STRIPPED WITH A SANDING/GRINDING OR HYDROBLASTING METHOD. 10.REFER TO CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR DIRECTION PERTAINING TO FENCE AND GATES 11.EXISTING PICKLEBALL COURT POST, ANCHORS AND FOOTINGS SHALL BE REMOVED AS PART OF THE DEMOLITION PROCESS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE VOID TO 95% WITH STRUCTURAL SOIL AND FINISH TO SURFACE PER DETAIL 2, SHEET C-7.2 AND SHEET C-7.2. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE LAYOUT DIMENSIONS TO CITY ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 13.EXCEPT WHERE NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL 10' HIGH FENCE SHALL RECEIVE A WINDSCREEN. 6 6 2 MINIMUM MINIMUM 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 333 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 333 6 6 6 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 22 222 Page 597 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 7 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-CDD-045 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE CEQA: Determine the ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. (Community Development Director Alison Becker) Recommended Action:1 Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Conduct a public hearing to consider the proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code pertaining to the Administrative Procedures; 2. Find that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines; and 3. Introduce by title only and waive first reading of an Ordinance (Attachment 1) of the City of Hermosa Beach approving the Zone Text Amendment (TA24-01). Executive Summary: The City initiated the Comprehensive Zoning Code Update in March 2020 by conducting an assessment of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. Since the initiation, the City has conducted several study sessions and meetings, which culminated in the Planning Commission recommending approval of amendments to Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) relating to administrative procedures. Background: In May 2020, the City released a Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment, which identified issues with Title 17 (Zoning) of the HBMC that should be addressed (Attachment 2). The City conducted study sessions and discussion meetings with the Planning Commission and Economic Development stakeholders on March 4, 2020, May 19, 2020, February 17, 2021, March 1, 2021, March 3, 2021, February 2, 2022, April 6, 2022, June 7, 2022, August 8, 2022, September 22, 2022, October 3, 2022, November 2, 2022, March 19, 2024, and April 16, 2024 to elicit public feedback on the assessment and input on the zone text amendments. The proposed amendment is part of the comprehensive zoning ordinance update, which is intended to implement the General Plan, update the City’s zoning ordinance current Page 598 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 7 planning practices, and ensure the City is in compliance with State law. These specific amendments would clarify how to administer the zoning ordinance by improving readability, removing ambiguities, and providing permitting and entitlement processes for all land use applications. Past Commission Actions Meeting Date Description Planning Commission April 16, 2024 Planning Commission Study Session, “IN-THE-ZONE” the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Update relating to Administrative Processes and Procedures. Planning Commission May 21, 2024 The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Zone Text Amendment (TA24-01) to amend various parts of Title 17 of the HBMC pertaining to the Administrative Procedures At the May 21, 2024, public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Ordinance for City Council approval and directed staff to: 1) revisit and clarify procedures for abandonment of Conditional Use Permits, 2) provide a clear definition for “ministerial”, and 3) specify that zoning clearances will undergo a concurrent review process. Since the Planning Commission’s hearing, staff addressed the Planning Commission’s direction, reviewed the ordinance further, and prepared a series of edits shown in underlining and strikeout to the recommended Ordinance (Attachment 3). The additional edits clean up text, improve readability, streamline project review, and reflect changes in state law or to the Zoning Ordinance that occurred between the Planning Commission’s action and this hearing. Staff is of the opinion that these additional changes do not significantly alter the code amendment considered by the Planning Commission and do not warrant additional Planning Commission input. Staff released this draft Ordinance on April 30, 2026. Staff held “Drop-In Office Hours” to discuss the draft Ordinance on May 6, 2026, May 12, 2026, and May 18, 2026 to gather further public input on the draft proposed amendments. The feedback received was generally focused on suggestions to improve clarity and predictability in the process, as well as the identification of typographical errors. Subsequent revisions were made to address many of these concerns. Discussion: In the context of the Zoning Code, administrative procedures are used to implement zoning regulations, establish procedures for conducting public hearings, public noticing requirements, and steps for processing set public notice requirements, and process land use applications. The proposed amendments would update the administrative procedures to ensure compliance with the General Plan, State laws, and current planning practice. Amendments include adding or revising the following chapters: Page 599 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 7 1. Chapter 17.01 (Introductory Provisions) – This chapter establishes the City’s authority to regulate zoning and clarifies the applicability of the zoning regulations. 2. Chapter 17.02 (Zoning Review Authorities) – This chapter specifies the review authority (Director, Planning Commission, City Council) for the various land use applications. 3. Chapter 17.03 (Administrative Procedures) – Administrative procedures established in this chapter include application requirements, review periods, public noticing, appeals, conduct of public hearings, and revisions, revocations, and expirations to approved entitlements. Additionally, this chapter establishes procedures to formally interpret the provisions of the zoning ordinance. 4. Section 17.04.040 (General Definitions) – The proposed amendment would add three new definitions into the existing list of definitions within the zoning ordinance. This includes defining the “Director”, “Building Official”, and “Ministerial Review” in context of implementing zoning regulations. 5. Chapter 17.60 (Zoning Clearance) – The zoning clearance provides staff a formal method to review ministerial applications. Reviews would be limited to ensure compliance with the General Plan and municipal code. 6. Chapter 17.62 (Administrative Permit) – Administrative permits include emergency shelters, limited live entertainment uses, limited outdoor seating, low- barrier navigation centers, residential care facilities, short -term vacation rentals, supportive housing (up to 50 units), and temporary use/events. This chapter establishes the process, procedures, and findings required to act on these applications. 7. Chapter 17.64 (Temporary Use Permit) – The City Council adopted Ordinance 25-1487, updating the regulations pertaining to Temporary Uses and Temporary Events in June of 2025. These provisions make it clear that approval is issued pursuant to Administrative Permits. Staff recommends the elimination of this chapter as the procedures are covered by the proposed Administrative Permit Chapter (Chapter 17.62). 8. Chapter 17.66 (Minor Exceptions) – The minor exception process would allow small deviations to development standards that could be approved by the Community Development Director without the need for a variance. The applicability of the section was deferred for future consideration by the Planning Commission. Staff has therefore incorporated the current administrative variances which includes: . Page 600 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 7  Up to ten percent reductions in setback and open space requirements for existing buildings;  Projections where existing setbacks conform except for projections at local points in the building walls, such as for bay windows when the length parallel to the wall of any such projection is no greater than eight feet, or when the existing projecting element is no closer than three feet from the property line and no greater than one-quarter of the total length of the wall from which it projects;  Eaves, to match the existing cave projection when adding to an existing building, and when the new eave will also conform to the requirements of the California Building Code;  The enlargement of windows in nonconforming buildings, and other minor structural alterations in nonconforming buildings, provided there is no increase in total floor area;  Up to a ten percent reduction in parking stall dimensions for structural reasons, when providing parking in existing buildings;  Arbors or trellises in rear yards, for privacy, when the grade of the adjacent property is higher than that of the subject property. Sides and tops of arbors and trellises are to be made only of f ramework or latticework, and must be at least fifty (50) percent open. 9. Chapter 17.68 (Minor Use Permit) - Minor Use Permits are intended for uses that have the potential to create small impacts to neighboring properties. Minor use permits would be reviewed by the Director but still allow for public input. 10. Chapter 17.70 (Conditional Use Permit) – While already required, conditional use permits requirements would be moved to Chapter 17.70. This chapter establishes the process, procedures, and findings required to act on these applications. 11. Chapter 17.72 (Parking Plan) – Parking plans, as currently allowed by Chapter 17.44 of the HBMC, allow the Planning Commission to reduce the required parking for a project. Chapter 17.72 formalizes the process, procedures, and findings required to act on these applications. 12. Chapter 17.74 (Precise Development Plan) – Precise development plans allow the City to review new development projects to ensure compliance with the General Plan, zoning code, and other city regulations. The Planning Commission considered a staff recommendation to streamline the review of smaller residential (2-4 units) projects to be exempt from the Planning Commission ’s review but ultimately did not approve it. Page 601 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 7 Staff is again proposing, for City Council’s consideration, a director-level approval for smaller projects that are not exempt from the Precise Development Plan. Adding a Minor Precise Development Plan would allow the Director to act on the projects listed below. Public notice and communit y input would still be included in the Minor Precise Development Plan; however no public hearing would be required. The amendments would provide for Major or Minor Precise Development Plan, which would include: Minor Precise Development Plans Minor Precise Development Plan would be approved by the Director and include:  Residential only projects with only 2-4 dwelling units.  Mixed use developments that have four or less dwelling units and have a nonresidential floor area of 3,000 square feet o r less.  Interior remodel greater than 3,000 square feet, with no exterior changes, in any zone. Major Precise Development Plans Major Precise Development Plan would be approved by the Planning Commission and include:  Residential only projects with five (5) or more dwelling units.  Mixed-use development that have five (5) or more dwelling units or include a nonresidential floor area of 3,001 square feet or greater regardless of the number of dwelling units.  Any nonresidential project that is not exempt or qualify for a Minor Precise Development Plan 13. Chapter 17.76 (Variances) - While already allowed, variance requirements would be moved to Chapter 17.76. This chapter establishes the process, procedures, and findings required to act on these applications. 14. Chapter 17.78 (Coastal Clearance) – Coastal clearances are a new requirement in the zoning ordinance. They would be required for developments in the Coastal Zone. They are intended to ensure that any changes made by the Coastal Commission still comply with the City’s codes. 15. Chapter 17.80 (Development Agreements) – The provisions are already included in the zoning ordinance but would be moved to Chapter 17.80. This chapter establishes the process, procedures, and findings required to act on these applications. Page 602 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 6 of 7 16. Chapter 17.82 (Specific Plans) – Chapter 17.38 of the HBMC currently contains all of the specific plans within the City, there is no formal method to amend or approve new specific plans other than what is contained in State law. Chapter 17.82 would complement the Specific Plans listed in Chapter 17.38 by establishing local processes, procedures, and findings to adopt a new specific plan or amend any of the existing specific plans. The Planning Commission would provide a recommendation to the City Council, who would make the final decision. 17. Chapter 17.84 (Zoning Amendments) – Chapter 17.84 establishes the formal process to amend the zoning ordinance. The Planning Commission would provide a recommendation to the City Council, who would make the final decision. 18. Chapter 17.86 (General Plan Amendment) – Chapter 17.86 establishes the formal process to amend the City’s general plan. The Planning Commission would provide a recommendation to the City Council, who would make the final decision. Next Steps Once administrative procedures are adopted, staff will prepare user-friendly graphic guides to accompany the municipal code and update the application forms. In addition, staff will be bringing forward fee schedule adjustments to align with new processes. Work on the comprehensive zoning code update will continue with updates to the commercial zones, including permitted uses, development standards, definitions, and parking. A variety of opportunities for public engagement will continue throughout the process. Environmental Analysis: The proposed zone text amendment is a project that is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and qualifies for an exemption from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the State CEQA Guidelines (Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations). The activity is covered by the Commonsense Exemption, which states that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. There is no possibility that the proposed changes to the administrative procedures within the zoning code may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, the activity is not subject to CEQA. No special circumstances exist that the proposed change would create a significant adverse effect on the environment (i.e. no sensitive species or habitats, no hazardous sites, no scenic highways, no historic resources, etc.). Public Notification: On April 30, 2026, a public notice regarding the May 26, 2026, City Council meeting was published in the Easy Reader and posted at City Hall, the Library, and the Community Center. Page 603 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 7 of 7 Attachments: 1. City Council Ordinance (with Exhibits A-R) 2. Zoning Code Assessment 3. Redlined and Annotated Draft Ordinance Exhibits Respectfully Submitted by: Alexis Oropeza, Planning Manager Concur: Alison Becker, AICP, Community Development Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 604 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 1 of 69 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ORDINANCE NO. ORD-26-XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA REPEALING, REPLACING, RENAMING, AND AMENDING PORTIONS OF TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, ZONING REVIEW AUTHORITIES, AND RELATED LAND USE ENTITLEMENT PROCEDURES AS PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE; AND DETERMINE THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) General Plan entitled “PLAN Hermosa” on August 22, 2017; and WHEREAS, the City initiated the Comprehensive Zoning Code Update in March 2020 to ensure consistency between Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (“Title 17”) and PLAN Hermosa; and WHEREAS, the City conducted study session and discussion meetings with the Planning Commission and Economic Development stakeholders (on March 4, 2020; May 19, 2020; February 17, 2021; March 1, 2021; March 3, 2021; February 2, 2022; April 6, 2022; June 7, 2022; August 8, 2022; September 22, 2022; October 3,2022; November 2, 2022; March 19, 2024; and April 16, 2024; and WHEREAS, a portion of the recommended zoning changes identified in the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment were included in Zoning Text Amendment TA23-02, approved as a part of the Housing Element related zoning changes in Ordinance 23-1471 dated November 14, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on May 21, 2024, to consider amending Title 17, and recommended approval of the amendments; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to modernize and consolidate administrative procedures and land use entitlement provisions within Title 17. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. Repeal and Replace. The provisions of Title 17 identified in this Ordinance are hereby repealed, replaced, renumbered, amended, and Page 605 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 2 of 69 consolidated as set forth in the attached exhibits. SECTION 3. Findings. The City Council finds that the amendments adopted by this Ordinance are consistent with PLAN Hermosa, and necessary to modernize administrative procedures and zoning implementation provisions. SECTION 4. Repeal of Specific Chapters and Sections. The City Council hereby repeals the following Chapters and Sections of Title 17: a. Section 17.26.040 – Similar Use Permitted b. Section 17.42.120 – Housing accessibility – Reasonable accommodation for disability c. Chapter 17.54 – Variances d. Chapter 17.55 – Administrative Permits e. Chapter 17.56 – Conditional Use Permits f. Chapter 17.58 – Precise Development Plans g. Chapter 17.64 – Development Agreements SECTION 5. Adoption of Amendments. The City Council hereby amends Title 17 and adopts the following exhibits, all of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference: a. Exhibit A. Chapter 17.01 – Introductory Provisions b. Exhibit B. Chapter 17.02 – Zoning Review Authorities c. Exhibit C. Chapter 17.03 – Administrative Procedures d. Exhibit D. Section 17.04.040 – Definitions e. Exhibit E. Chapter 17.60 – Zoning Clearance f. Exhibit F. Chapter 17.62 – Administrative Permit g. Exhibit G. Chapter 17. 66 – Minor Exception h. Exhibit H. Chapter 17. 68 – Minor Use Permit i. Exhibit I. Chapter 17. 70 – Conditional Use Permit j. Exhibit J. Chapter 17. 72 – Parking Plan k. Exhibit K. Chapter 17. 74 – Precise Development Plan l. Exhibit L. Chapter 17. 76 – Variances m. Exhibit M. Chapter 17. 78 – Coastal Clearance n. Exhibit N. Chapter 17. 80 – Development Agreements o. Exhibit O. Chapter 17. 82 – Specific Plans p. Exhibit P. Chapter 17. 84 – Zoning Amendments q. Exhibit Q. Chapter 17. 86 – General Plan Amendments SECTION 6. California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The City Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because the amendments relate to administrative procedures and do not authorize additional development or intensification of land use. Page 606 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 3 of 69 SECTION 7. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications; and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. SECTION 8. Certification. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City’s book of original ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within fifteen (15) days after the Ordinance’s passage and adoption, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law. SECTION 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days following adoption by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 26th day of May 2026. Mayor Mike Detoy PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ________________________________ Martha Alvarez Jason Baltimore City Clerk Interim City Attorney Page 607 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 4 of 69 EXHIBIT A CHAPTER 17.01 – INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS Chapter 17.01 (Introductory Provisions) is hereby added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.01 Introductory Provisions 17.01.010 Title Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be known and cited as the “Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance”, “Zoning Ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach”, or “Zoning Ordinance.” 17.01.020 Purpose The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to implement the City’s General Plan and to protect and promote the public health, safety, peace, comfort, convenience, prosperity, and general welfare. More specifically, the Zoning Ordinance is adopted to achieve the following objectives: A. Provide standards for the orderly growth and development of the City, and guide and control the use of land to provide a safe, harmonious, attractive, and sustainable community. B. Achieve the arrangement of land uses depicted in the Hermosa Beach General Plan, consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. C. Enhance the appearance of the City and promote high-quality design. D. Preserve and enhance the quality of life and character of residential neighborhoods. E. Promote economic growth and the creation of jobs. F. Facilitate the appropriate location of community facilities, institutions, transportation, and parks and recreational areas. G. Allow for public participation in government decision-making regarding land use and development in a manner consistent with State law. Page 608 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 5 of 69 H. Define duties and powers of administrative bodies and officers responsible for implementation of the Zoning Ordinance. 17.01.030 Authority The Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority contained in Section 65850 of the California Government Code. 17.01.040 Relationship to the General Plan This Zoning Ordinance implements the goals and policies of PLAN Hermosa, the city’s adopted Hermosa Beach General Plan, and Coastal Land Use Plan, by regulating the use of land and structures within the City. Any permit, license, or approval issued pursuant to this Zoning Ordinance must be consistent with the General Plan and all applicable specific plans. 17.01.050 Applicability A. Applicability to Property. This Zoning Ordinance shall apply, to the extent permitted by law, to all property within the corporate limits of the City of Hermosa Beach and to property for which applications for development and/or subdivisions have been submitted to the City of Hermosa Beach, including all uses, structures, and land owned by any private person, firm, corporation or organization, or the City of Hermosa Beach or other local, State, or Federal agencies. Any governmental agency shall be exempt from the provisions of this Zoning Ordinance only to the extent that such property may not be lawfully regulated by the City. B. Minimum Requirements. The provisions of this Zoning Ordinance shall be deemed the minimum requirements for the promotion of the public health, safety, and general welfare. Where this Zoning Ordinance provides for more discretion on the part of a City official or body, that discretion may be exercised to impose more stringent requirements than set forth in this Zoning Ordinance as may be necessary to promote orderly land use development and the purposes of this Zoning Ordinance. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require or allow a City official or body to exercise its discretion in a manner that would be contrary to state or Federal law. C. Compliance with Regulations. No land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed, occupied, enlarged, altered, demolished, or moved in any zone, except in accordance with the provisions of this Zoning Ordinance, Page 609 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 6 of 69 including the development and performance standards herein, and any permit issued pursuant hereto. The temporary or transitory nature of a use does not exempt it from this requirement. D. Conflicting Regulations. The regulations of this Zoning Ordinance and requirements or conditions imposed pursuant to this Zoning Ordinance shall not supersede any other regulations or requirements adopted or imposed by the Hermosa Beach City Council, the State of California, or any Federal agency that has jurisdiction by law over uses and development authorized by this Zoning Ordinance. All uses and development authorized by this Zoning Ordinance shall comply with all other such regulations and requirements. E. Private Agreements. This Zoning Ordinance shall not interfere with or annul any recorded easement, covenant, or other agreement now in effect, provided that where any recorded easement, covenant, or other agreement now in effect, is in conflict with state or federal law, or this Zoning Ordinance imposes a greater restriction than imposed by an easement, covenant, or agreement, this Zoning Ordinance shall control. The City of Hermosa Beach shall not be responsible for monitoring or enforcing private agreements. F. Prior Ordinance. The provisions of this Zoning Ordinance supersede all prior ordinances codified in Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code and any amendments. No provisions of this Zoning Ordinance shall validate any land use or structure established, constructed, or maintained in violation of the prior Zoning Ordinance, unless such land use or structure is specifically authorized by this Zoning Ordinance and is in conformance with all other regulations. G. Effect on Previously Approved Projects and Projects in Progress. 1. Building Permit. Any building or structure for which a Building Permit has been issued may be completed and used in accordance with the plans, specifications, and permits on which said Building Permit was granted, provided construction is diligently pursued and completed pursuant to the provisions of the California Building Code, as adopted by the City of Hermosa Beach. 2. Previously Approved Land Use Authorization. This Zoning Ordinance shall not interfere with, repeal, abrogate, or annul any previously granted land use authorization, unless otherwise specified in this Title. Any land use or structure, which was previously legally established, Page 610 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 7 of 69 and has been deemed nonconforming as a result of adoption of this Zoning Ordinance, shall be subject to Chapter 17.52 (Nonconforming Buildings and Uses). All permits, entitlements, and conditions of approval of previous land use authorizations shall apply until the applicable review authority specifically repeals the allowance, requirement of this Title, or condition. 3. Land Use Authorization in Process. An application for a discretionary land use authorization that has been accepted by the Community Development Department as complete for processing prior to the adoption of this Zoning Ordinance or any applicable amendment shall be processed according to the requirements of this Zoning Ordinance or the prior Zoning Ordinance upon written request from the project applicant. The written request shall be made no later than 30 days after the effective date of this Zoning Ordinance and at least one action must be taken by the review authority within 210 days of the effective date of this Zoning Ordinance. H. Application During Local Emergency. The City Council may authorize a deviation from a provision of this Zoning Ordinance during a local emergency declared and ratified under the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. The City Council may authorize a deviation by resolution without notice or public hearing. 17.01.060 Responsibility for Administration The Zoning Ordinance shall be administered by the Hermosa Beach City Council, Planning Commission, and Community Development Department as established in Chapter 17.02, Zoning Review Authorities. 17.01.070 Permissive Ordinance This title shall be considered a permissive ordinance, whereby only those uses, structures, or facilities that are authorized hereby are allowed, except as provided through an administrative determination, an administrative use permit, or other discretionary action. 17.01.080 Severability If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Zoning Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity Page 611 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 8 of 69 of the remaining portions of this Zoning Ordinance. The Hermosa Beach City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Zoning Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any or one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 17.01.090 Fees The City Council shall establish by resolution, and may amend and revise from time to time, fees for processing the discretionary entitlement applications and other permits authorized or required by this Zoning Ordinance, as well as the necessary fees to mitigate impacts, as allowed by State law. All fees shall be paid at the time an application is filed, and no processing shall commence until the fees are paid in full. 17.01.100 Penalty A. Violations of zoning regulations. Violations of the provisions of this title shall be subject to the administrative penalty provisions of Chapter 1.10. B. Each day a separate offense. Each person, firm or corporation found guilty of a violation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for every day during any portion of which any violation of any provision of this title is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm or corporation, and any use, occupation or building or structure maintained contrary to the provisions hereof shall constitute a public nuisance. C. Violation of conditions of conditional use permits and precise development plans. No person shall violate any conditions of a conditional use permit or precise development plan. Such violations shall be subject to the administrative penalty provisions of Chapter 1.10 in addition to the measures set out in Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). Page 612 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 9 of 69 EXHIBIT B CHAPTER 17.02 – ZONING REVIEW AUTHORITES Chapter 17.02 (Declaration of Purpose) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.02 (Zoning Review Authorities) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.02 Zoning Review Authorities 17.02.010 Purpose This Chapter lays out the basic roles, responsibilities, and functions of all planning authorities under this Title, including the City Council, Planning Commission, and Community Development Director (Director). 17.02.020 City Council The powers and responsibilities of the City Council include, but are not limited to the following: A. Consider and adopt, deny, or modify proposed General Plan Amendments, Local Coastal Program, Specific Plans, and environmental documents related to any of the foregoing, pursuant to Chapter 17.17 (General Plan Amendments). B. Consider and adopt, deny or modify proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map and environmental documents related to any of the foregoing, pursuant to Chapter 17.16 (Zoning Amendments). C. Consider and adopt, deny, or modify Development Agreements, following a public hearing and recommended action by the Planning Commission, pursuant to Chapter 17.14 (Development Agreements). D. Hear and decide appeals from decisions of the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). E. Establish, by resolution, a Master Fee Schedule charges, and deposits for various applications and services provided, pursuant to Chapter 2.64 (Fees and Service Charges). 17.02.030 Planning Commission Page 613 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 10 of 69 The powers and responsibilities of the Planning Commission include, but are not limited to the following: A. Annually review of progress towards implementation of the General Plan and make recommendations to the City Council based on any new legislation, development trends, or changing economic, social, and environmental conditions. B. Approve, modify, or deny Precise Development Plans, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Certificates of Appropriateness, and other entitlements as outlined in Section 17.02.050 (Review Authorities for Decisions and Appeals). C. Make recommendations to the City Council on Development Agreements. D. Make recommendations to City Council on proposed amendments to the General Plan, Specific Plan(s), Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map and environmental determinations related to any of the foregoing. E. Hear and approve, modify, or deny appeals from decisions of the Community Development Director. F. Hear and approve, modify, or deny proposals to revoke permits, pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). G. Make environmental determinations on any powers and responsibilities listed in this section and that are subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act, except as excluded above. H. Such other powers and responsibilities as assigned or directed by the City Council. 17.02.040 Community Development Director The powers and responsibilities of the Community Development Director or their designee, include, but are not limited to the following: A. Maintain, interpret, and administer the Zoning Ordinance, including the processing of applications, abatements, interpretations, and other enforcement actions. B. Review applications for permits and licenses for conformance with this Title and issue a Zoning Clearance when the proposed use, activity or building Page 614 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 11 of 69 is allowed by right and conforms to all applicable development and use standards. C. Approve, modify, or deny Permits, as authorized pursuant to Section 17.02.050 (Review Authorities for Decisions and Appeals). D. Initiate Specific Plans and related amendments; zoning code and zoning maps Amendments; and General Plan Amendments, including amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map. E. Refer items to the Planning Commission where, in the Director’s determination, the public interest would be better served by a Planning Commission public hearing and action. F. Make environmental determinations on any powers and responsibilities listed in this section and that are subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to State law. G. Make recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council on all applications, appeals, and other matters upon which they have the authority and the responsibility to act under this Title. H. Investigate and report to the Planning Commission on permit violations when the City has initiated revocation procedures, pursuant to Section TBD, Revocation of Permits. I. Delegate administrative functions to members of the Community Development Department. J. Other duties and powers as may be assigned by the City Manager or may be established through legislation. 17.02.050 Review Authorities for Decisions and Appeals Summary of Review Authorities for Decisions and Appeals, summarizes the powers and duties that each review authority has under this Title. Where a project requires more than one type of application, all permit requests may be reviewed and decided on by the highest review authority established for any of the applications. Page 615 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 12 of 69 REVIEW AUTHORITIES FOR DECISIONS AND APPEALS Decision Type  Advisory Body  Review Authority * Appeal Body  Public Notification Ministerial Action Zoning Clearance - Staff Director No Administrative Action Administrative Permit Emergency Shelters - Director Planning Commission No Entertainment, Limited Live - Director Planning Commission No Limited Outdoor Seating - Director Planning Commission No Low Barrier Navigation Centers - Director Planning Commission1 No Residential Care Facility - Director Planning Commission No Short Term Vacation Rental - Director Planning Commission No Supportive Housing (up to 50 units) - Director Planning Commission1 No Temporary Use and Temporary Events - Director Planning Commission No Convex Slope Determination - Director Planning Commission Yes Portable A-Frame - Director Planning Commission No Temporary Sign Permit Alternative Grade Determination - Director Planning Commission No Reasonable Accommodation Building Official Director Planning Commission1 No Minor Modification - Director N/A No Zoning and Similar Use Interpretation - Director Planning Commission No Entitlement Action Page 616 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 13 of 69 REVIEW AUTHORITIES FOR DECISIONS AND APPEALS Decision Type  Advisory Body  Review Authority * Appeal Body  Public Notification Certificate of Appropriaten ess Minor Director Planning Commission - Yes Major Director Planning Commission City Council Conditional Use Permit - Planning Commission City Council Yes Minor Use Permit - Director Planning Commission Yes Variance - Planning Commission City Council Yes Minor Exception - Director Planning Commission Yes Parking Plan - Planning Commission City Council Yes Amendment to Planning Entitlement - Planning Commission City Council Yes Precise Development Plan Minor - Director Planning Commission Yes Major - Planning Commission City Council Yes Determination of Legality of Nonconforming Residential Buildings - Planning Commission City Council Yes Legislative Action General Plan Amendment Planning Commissio n City Council - Yes Specific Plan Planning Commissio n City Council - Yes Zoning Amend ments Zone Text Amendment Planning Commissio n City Council - Yes Zone Change Planning Commissio n City Council - Yes Development Agreement Planning Commissio n City Council - Yes Page 617 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 14 of 69 REVIEW AUTHORITIES FOR DECISIONS AND APPEALS Decision Type  Advisory Body  Review Authority * Appeal Body  Public Notification Historic Landmark Nomination Planning Commissio n City Council - Yes (1) Subject to appeal only if denied by the Director. Page 618 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 15 of 69 EXHIBIT C CHAPTER 17.03 – ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES Chapter 17.03 (Administrative Procedures) is hereby added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.03 Administrative Procedures 17.03.010 Purpose This Chapter establishes uniform procedures for the preparation, filing, and processing of any land use permits and entitlement applications provided for in this Title, unless superseded by a specific requirement of this Title or State law. 17.03.020 Application Forms and Fees A. Applicant. The owner of property or their authorized agent may submit applications for land use permits. If the application is made by someone other than the owner or the owner’s agent, proof of the right to represent the owner shall accompany the application. The Director shall prepare and issue application forms and lists that specify the information required from applicants. B. Application Materials. 1. Application Forms and Fees. Applications for land use permits, which are authorized by this Title, shall be filed on forms prepared by the Director, which may be modified from time to time. Applications shall be accompanied by all required fees as outlined in the Master Fee Schedule. 2. Supporting Materials. The Director shall provide a list of supporting materials that shall be submitted as part of the application. This may include, but is not limited to: statements, photographs, plans, drawings, renderings, models, material samples, technical studies, and other items necessary to describe existing conditions and the proposed project and determine the level of environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 3. Availability of Materials. All submitted material becomes the property of the City, may be distributed to the public, and shall be made available for public inspection. At any time, upon reasonable request, and during normal business hours, any person may examine application materials at the Community Development Department. Unless prohibited by law or superseded by specific permit Page 619 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 16 of 69 confidentiality requirements, copies of application materials shall be made available. The City shall charge fees for copies in accordance with the fee resolution adopted by City Council. C. Multiple Applications. 1. Concurrent Filing. An applicant for a project which requires more than one land use permit by this Title (e.g., Conditional Use Permit, Variance, Precise Development Plan, etc.), shall file all related applications concurrently, with all applicable fees. 2. Concurrent Processing. Multiple land use permits for the same project shall be processed concurrently and shall be reviewed and decided on by the highest review authority designated for any of the applications. D. Application Fees. Refund of Fees. Application fees are non-refundable regardless of the review authority's decision. Filing fees cover the costs incurred by the City for staff’s review of the application materials, preparation of required finings, notices, and postings. In the case of an application withdrawal prior to the public hearing notice, the Director, at the request of the applicant, may authorize a partial refund in accordance with department policy. 17.03.030 Review of Applications A. Initial Completeness Review. The Director shall determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the date the application is filed and required fee received. 1. Incomplete Application. If an application is deemed incomplete, the Director shall provide written notification to the applicant listing the applications for permit(s), forms, information, and any additional fees that are necessary to complete the application and specify a time limit for submittal of the requested information. The time limit to submit additional information shall be at least 30 days. a. Zoning Ordinance Violations. An application shall not be found complete if conditions exist on the site in violation of this Title or any permit or other approval granted in compliance with this Title, unless the proposed project includes the correction of the violations or, in the sole discretion of the Director, the application is deemed complete notwithstanding the violation. Page 620 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 17 of 69 b. Appeal of Determination. Determinations of incompleteness are subject to the provisions of Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review), except there shall be a final written determination on the appeal no later than 60 days after receipt of the appeal. The fact that an appeal is permitted to both the Planning Commission and the City Council does not extend the 60-day period. c. Expiration of Application. If an applicant fails to correct the specified deficiencies within the specific time limit pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension), the application shall expire and be deemed withdrawn, unless an extension is granted by the Director. After the expiration of an application, review shall require the submittal of a new, complete application, along with all required fees. 2. Complete Application. When an application is deemed complete, the Director shall make a record of that date. If an application requires a public hearing, the Director shall schedule it and notify the applicant of the date and time, pursuant to Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice). B. Referral of Application. At the discretion of the Director, or where otherwise required by this Title, State or Federal law, any application filed in compliance with this Title may be referred to any City department, public agency, or interest group that may be affected by or have an interest in the proposed land use project. C. Extensions. The Director may, upon written request and for good cause, grant extensions of any time limit for review of applications imposed by this Title. 17.03.040 Environmental Review All discretionary projects shall be reviewed for compliance or exemption with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The designated planning authority for the entitlement shall be responsible for taking action on the corresponding exemption or environmental review. Environmental review will be conducted pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines). If Title 14 of the California Code is amended, such amendments will govern City procedures. Page 621 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 18 of 69 17.03.050 Public Notice Unless otherwise specified, whenever the provisions of this Title require public notice, the City shall provide notice as required by this section and by the California Government Code. A. Notification Method. Public Notice shall be provided a minimum of 10 days, but no more than 45 days, prior to the public hearing or to a Director’s decision. Permit Type Notice Type Notification Method Mailing Radius Websit e Site Postin g Newspape r Minor Exception Notice of Pending Action Adjacent and Abutting1 Properties Yes No No Minor Use Permit Notice of Pending Action 100’ Yes No No Minor Precise Development Plan Notice of Pending Action 100’ Yes Yes No All Other Residential Projects Notice of Hearing 300’ Yes Yes Yes Commerci al Projects Notice of Hearing 500’ Yes Yes Yes General Plan or Zoning Code Text Amendment Notice of Hearing N/A Yes N/A Yes ⅛ page ad minimum size General Plan or Zoning Code Map Amendment Notice of Hearing 500’ Yes Yes Yes (1). Shall include properties located across a street or alley. Page 622 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 19 of 69 B. Mailed Notice. At least ten (10) days before the date of the public hearing or the date of the Director’s decision notice shall be provided by First-Class mail delivery to the following: 1. The applicant, the owner, and any occupant of the subject property; 2. The owner and occupants of all properties within the specific notification radius; and 3. Any person or group who has filed a written request for notice regarding the specific application; 4. School districts and any other local agency expected to provide essential facilities or services to the property which is the subject of the application, whose ability to provide those facilities and services may be affected; and 5. Blind, Aged, and Disabled Communities. Whenever a hearing is held regarding a permit for a drive-through facility, or modification of an existing drive-through facility permit, notice procedures shall incorporate the blind, aged, and disabled communities in order to facilitate their participation. C. Alternative Method for Large Mailings. If the number of persons to whom notice would be mailed or delivered is greater than 1,000, instead of a mailed notice, notice may be provided by providing notice by placing a display advertisement of at least one-eighth page in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the City and posted in three public locations at least 10 days prior to the hearing or the date of action when a public hearing is required. D. Newspaper Notice. At least ten (10) days before the date of the public hearing or the date of action when no public hearing is required, the City shall publish a notice in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the City. E. Internet Notice. At least ten (10) days before the date of the public hearing or the date of the Director’s decision the notice shall be published on the City’s website. F. Site Posting. At least ten (10) days before the date of the public hearing a minimum of one public notice shall be posted on the project site in a conspicuous place along the property frontage abutting the public-right- of way. Page 623 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 20 of 69 G. Amendments. Notwithstanding any other time limit set forth in this Chapter, any amendment or ordinance that affects the permitted use of real property, notice shall be published, posted, mailed, and delivered, or advertised, as applicable, at least 20 days before the hearing. H. Additional Notice. The Director may require additional notice in a manner the Director deems appropriate. I. Content of Public Notice. The notice, at a minimum, shall include the following information: 1. The location of the real property that is the subject of the application; 2. Name of property owner(s), representative(s), and applicant. 3. A general description of the proposed project or action; 4. The City’s assigned file numbers to the application. 5. A statement indicating if the project is located within the Coastal Zone. 6. The date, time, location, review authority, and purpose of the public hearing or the date of action when no public hearing is required; 7. A statement indicating the level of environmental review that is applicable to the project and the location and times any environmental impact assessment prepared in connection with the application may be viewed by the public; 8. A statement that any interested person or authorized agent may appear and be heard; 9. A statement describing how to submit written comments; and 10. For matters which the Planning Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council, or when the Planning Commission’s decision is appealed to the City Council, the notice shall also include a summary of the Planning Commission’s action. The omission of a component of the public notice content shall not automatically invalidate a public notice. Page 624 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 21 of 69 J. Failure to Receive Mailed Notice. The validity of the proceedings shall not be affected by the failure of any property owner, resident, or community organization to receive mailed notice. 17.03.060 Conduct of Public Hearings Whenever the provisions of this Title require a public hearing, the hearing shall be conducted in compliance with the requirements of State law as follows. A. Generally. Hearings shall be conducted pursuant to procedures adopted by the hearing body. B. Scheduling. Hearings before the City Council shall be scheduled by the City Clerk. All other hearings shall be scheduled by the Director . C. Public Hearing Testimony. Any person may appear at a public hearing and submit oral or written evidence, either individually or as a representative of a person or an organization. D. Time Limits. The City Council may establish time limits for individual testimony. E. Continuance of Public Hearing. The body conducting the public hearing may by motion continue the public hearing to a fixed date, time and place without additional hearing notice or may continue the item to an undetermined date with public notice of the continued hearing. F. Decision. The public hearing shall be closed before a vote is taken. 17.03.070 Findings and Notice of Action When deciding to approve, approve with conditions, modify, revoke, or deny any discretionary permit under this Title, the review authority shall issue a Notice of Action and make findings of fact as required by this Title. A. Findings. Findings, when required by State law or this Title, shall be based upon consideration of the application, plans, testimony, reports, and other materials that constitute the administrative record and shall be stated in writing in the resolution or notice of action on the permit. B. Date of Action. The review authority shall decide to approve, modify, revoke, or deny any discretionary permit following the closure of the public Page 625 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 22 of 69 hearing, or if no public hearing is required, within 30 days of the date the City has determined an application to be complete. C. Notice of Action. Upon approving, modifying, or denying a land use permit by the review authority, a notice of action shall be issued. The Notice shall describe the action taken, including any applicable conditions, the findings that were the basis for the decisions, and if the decision is subject to appeal. 1. Director’s Action. The Director shall mail the Notice to the applicant and to any other person or entity that has filed a written request for such notification with the Community Development Department within the five days of the decision being made. 2. Planning Commission Action. The Director shall mail a Notice of Action to the applicant and to any other person or entity that has filed a written request for such notification with the Community Development Department within five days of the Planning Commission action. Additionally, the City Council shall receive notification pursuant to Section 2.52.040 City Council Review of Decisions of the Planning Commission the. 3. . City Council Action. Within five days of City Council action, the City Clerk shall mail a Notice of Action to the applicant and to any other person or entity that has filed a written request for such notification with the Community Development Department. 17.03.080 Scope of Approval A. Scope. The scope of approvals includes only those uses and activities proposed in the application. B. Conditions. The site plan, floor plans, building elevations, and/or any additional information or representation indicating the proposed structure or manner of operation submitted with an application or submitted during the approval process shall be deemed conditions of approval. Any approval may be subject to requirements that the applicant guarantees, warranties, or ensures compliance with submitted plans and conditions in all respects. C. Actions Voiding Approval. If the construction of a building or structure or the use established is contrary to the description or illustration in the application, to either violate any provision of this Title or require additional permits, then the approval shall be subject to the revocation as set forth in Page 626 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 23 of 69 Section 17.03.110 Revocation of Permits. D. Periodic Review. All approvals may be subject to periodic review to determine compliance with the permit and applicable conditions. If a condition specifies that activities or uses allowed under the permit are subject to periodic reporting, monitoring, or assessments, it shall be the responsibility of the permit holder, the property owner, or successor property owners to comply with such conditions. 17.03.090 Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension A. Effective Dates. A decision shall be effective on the date of action except as provided below. No building permit or business license shall be issued until after the effective date. 1. City Council Decisions. All City Council actions shall become effective immediately, with the exception of Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map, and any new or amended Specific Plan, which . shall take effect 30 days after the second reading of the ordinance, unless adopted by urgency in accordance with applicable law. 2. Planning Commission Decisions. All Planning Commission actions shall become effective 15 days after the decision unless : a. City Council initiates review pursuant to Section 2.52.040, City Council Review of Decisions of the Planning Commission, of this code. b. After the expiration of the 15-day appeal period following the date of action, unless an appeal is filed pursuant to Section 17.03.120. 3. Director Decisions. A Director’s decision on an application for any approval subject to appeal shall become effective after the expiration of the 15-day appeal period following the date of action, unless an appeal is filed pursuant to Section 17.03.120. B. Expiration. The review authority, in the granting of any permit, may specify a time, consistent with the purposes of the use and necessary to safeguard the public safety, health and welfare, within which the proposed use or development must be undertaken and actively and continuously pursued. If no time period is specified, any permit granted under this Title shall Page 627 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 24 of 69 automatically expire when no project or use has been exercised or extended within two years after the date of the approval, except as provided below. 1. Extension for Permit Where a Coastal Development Permit is Required. The time limits for any permit for development that also requires a Coastal Development Permit shall be automatically extended to be the same as the term of such Coastal Development Permit. 2. Extension for Permit Granted in Conjunction with Tentative Map. The time limits for any permit granted in conjunction with an approved tentative map shall be automatically extended to be the same as the term of such tentative map. 3. Extensions for Permits Associated with Development Agreements. The time limits for any permit granted in conjunction with a Development Agreement shall be extended to the same as the term of such Development Agreement. 4. Other Extensions. The Director may approve a one-year extension of any permit or approval granted under this Title upon receipt of a written application with the required fee at least 30 days prior to the expiration date. C. Exercise of Permit. An approval or permit for the use of a building or property shall be considered exercised when any of the following occurs: 1. A valid City business license has been issued, and the permitted use has commenced on the site. 2. A valid City building permit is issued, and construction has commenced and is diligently pursued to completion. 17.03.100 Minor Modifications and Amendments No revision in the use or structure for which a permit or other approval has been issued is permitted unless the permit is revised as follows: A. Minor Modifications. The Community Development Director may approve minor revisions to approved plans and permits, excluding late-night establishments and outdoor uses, when it can be found that the modification is consistent with the original application findings, Page 628 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 25 of 69 environmental analysis, and conditions approved by the original Review Authority. The modifications may not substantially expand or intensify the use or approved floor area by a cumulative amount greater than ten percent or 1,500 square feet, whichever is less. B. Amendment. Any revision, modification, or amendment to a permit, which does not meet the qualifications for a Minor Modification set forth in subsection A, for a use or structure may be modified by the original approval authority for said use or structure. The manner in which the revision, modification, or amendment shall be considered shall be the same in which a new permit for a use or structure would be considered. 17.03.110 Revocation of Permits Any permit granted under this Title may be revoked or revised for cause if any of the conditions or terms of the permit are violated or if any law or ordinance is violated. A. Initiation of Proceeding. Revocation proceedings may be initiated by the City Council, Planning Commission, or Director. B. Public Notice, Hearings, and Action. After conducting a duly-noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission shall act on the proposed revocation, pursuant to Chapter 17.03.050. C. Required Findings. The Planning Commission may revoke or modify the permit if it makes any of the following findings: 1. That the approval was obtained by fraud or material misrepresentation that vitiates one of the required findings of the permit; 2. That the use or activity for which such approval was granted has permanently ceased to exist as evidenced by demolition, alteration, subsequent use of the space, or similar conditions; 3. That the use or activity for which such approval was granted has been suspended or dormant for longer than 12 consecutive months, as demonstrated by any form of evidence or documentation. 4. That the permit or variance granted is being, or recently has been, exercised contrary to the terms or conditions of such approval, or in violation of any statute, ordinance, law or regulation; Page 629 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 26 of 69 5. That the use for which the approval was granted was or is so exercised as to be detrimental to the public health or safety, or so as to constitute a nuisance; 6. That the circumstances under which the permit was granted have been changed by the owner or operator to such a degree that one or more of the findings contained in the permit is no longer valid and the public health, safety, and welfare merit revocation of the permit; or 7. That the conditions of approval are found to be inadequate to mitigate the impacts of the use allowed by the permit, and the public health, safety and welfare merit modification of the permit. B. Notice of Action. Following Planning Commission action to revoke or modify a permit, the Director shall issue a Notice of Action within five business days. The Notice shall describe the Commission’s action with its findings. The Director shall mail notice to the permit holder and to any person or entity who requested the revocation proceeding. 17.03.120 Appeals and Calls for Review A. City Council Calls for Review. Two members of the City Council may initiate review of any actions of the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 2.52.040 of this Code. B. Appeals. 1. Applicability. Any action by the Director or Planning Commission in the administration or enforcement of the provisions of this Title may be appealed in accordance with this Section. a. Appeals of Director Decisions. Decisions of the Director may be appealed to the Planning Commission by filing a written appeal with the Community Development Department. The Planning Commission’s decision is final and may not be appealed to City Council. b. Appeals of Planning Commission Decisions. Decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing a written appeal with the City Clerk. The City Council’s decision is final. Page 630 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 27 of 69 2. Rights of Appeal. Appeals may be filed by the applicant, by the owner of property, or by any other person aggrieved by a decision that is subject to appeal under the provisions of this Ordinance. 3. Time Limits. Unless otherwise specified in State or Federal law, an aggrieved member of the public, including the applicant, may file an appeal in writing fifteen (15) calendar days following the date which the action was taken. However, the City Council may call up a Planning Commission decision within the 15-day period in accordance with Section 2.52.040. In the event an appeal period ends on a day the City is closed, the appeal period shall end at the close of business on the next consecutive business day. 4. Procedures. a. Filing. The appeal shall identify the decision being appealed and shall clearly and concisely state the reasons for the appeal. The appeal shall be accompanied by the required fee. b. Proceedings Stayed by Appeal. The timely filing of an appeal shall stay all proceedings in the matter appealed including, but not limited to, the issuance of City building permits and business licenses. c. Transmission of Record. The Director, or in the case of appeals to the City Council, City Clerk, shall schedule the appeal for consideration by the authorized hearing body. The Director shall forward the appeal, the Notice of Action, and all other documents that constitute the record to the hearing body. The Director shall also prepare a staff report that responds to the issues raised by the appeal and may include a recommendation for action. 5. Standards of Review. When reviewing any decision on appeal, the appeal body shall use the same standards for decision-making required for the original decision. The appeal body may revise or adopt the same decision and findings as were originally approved; it also may request or require changes to the application as a condition of approval. 6. Public Notice and Hearing. Public notice shall be provided, and the Page 631 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 28 of 69 hearing conducted by the applicable appeal body pursuant to Section 17.03.050. Notice of the hearing shall also be given to the applicant and party filing the appeal and any other interested person who has filed with the City Clerk a written request for such notice. 7. Action. An action to grant an appeal shall require a majority vote of the hearing body members. A tie vote shall have the effect of rejecting the appeal. 17.03.130 Zoning Determination and Similar Use Determinations Requests for determinations of this Title and verifications relating to prior approvals or permits may be made to the Director. Requests shall be in writing. A. Zoning Determination. A request for an interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance may be made for provisions that are unclear. 1. Community Development Director Interpretations: a. Director’s Administrative Zoning Determination. As part of the director’s administrative authority, the Director my initiate a code interpretation whenever necessary to clarify a conflicting provision or procedure of the code. b. Director’s Formal Zoning Determination. The Director may respond to formal inquiries regarding code provisions. The interpretation shall be in writing and will be made available by the Community Development Department pursuant to this section. Formal Director’s Interpretations are binding and may be appealed pursuant to Chapter 17.03.050. A fee for a formal interpretation shall be assessed in accordance with City’s Fee Schedule. 2. Procedures. The Community Development Director shall file a formal Zoning Determination with the Planning Commission within 60-days of the determination. Following the acceptance of the determination the Community Development Director shall: a. Publish the determination to the City’s website; and b. Update the Zone Code to reflect the determination within a reasonable timeframe. Page 632 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 29 of 69 B. Similar Use Determination. A request for a Similar Use Determination may be made for a use not listed in the Zone. 1. Findings. The Community Development Director may find a use that is not listed in the zone is allowed provided the following findings can affirmatively be made: a. The characteristics of, and activities associated with, the proposed use are not more intense than those uses listed in the zoning district as allowable, and will not involve a greater level of activity, population density, intensity, traffic generation, parking, dust, odor, noise, or similar impacts than comparable uses in the zone; b. The proposed use will meet the purpose of the zone that is applied to the location of the use; c. The proposed use will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, or any applicable Specific Plan; and d. The proposed use is not specifically prohibited. 2. Procedures. The Community Development Director shall file the use determination findings with the Planning Commission within 60-days of the determination. Following the acceptance of the determination the Community Development Director shall: a. Publish the determination to the city’s website; and b. Update the Zone Code to reflect the determination within a reasonable timeframe. 17.03.140 Reasonable Accommodation for Disability A. Purpose and Applicability. In compliance with Federal and State fair housing laws, it is the purpose of this section to provide reasonable accommodations in the City’s zoning and land use regulations, policies, and practices when needed to provide an individual with any disability an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. B. Notice to the Public of Availability of Accommodation Process. The City shall prominently display in the public areas of the Community Page 633 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 30 of 69 Development Department at City Hall a notice advising those with disabilities or their representatives that they may request a reasonable accommodation in accordance with the procedures established in this section. City employees shall direct individuals to the display whenever they are requested to do so or reasonably believe that individuals with disabilities or their representatives may be entitled to a reasonable accommodation. C. Application Submittal. Any person with a disability may request a reasonable accommodation on a form supplied by the Community Development Department.: 1. Timing. A request for reasonable accommodation may be filed at any time that the accommodation may be necessary to ensure equal access to housing. 2. Obligations. A reasonable accommodation does not affect or negate an individual’s obligations to comply with other applicable regulations not at issue in the requested accommodation. 3. Assistance. If an individual needs assistance in making the request for reasonable accommodation, the City shall provide assistance to ensure that the process is accessible. 4. Concurrent Filing. Should the request for reasonable accommodation be made concurrently with a discretionary permit, then the fee for a reasonable accommodation application may be waived provided that the prescribed fee shall be paid for all other discretionary permits. D. Reviewing Authority. Applications for reasonable accommodation shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director or their designee. E. Findings. The reviewing authority shall approve the request for a reasonable accommodation if, based upon all of the evidence presented, the following findings can be made: 1. The housing, which is the subject of the request for reasonable accommodation, will be occupied by an individual with disabilities protected under Fair Housing Laws; 2. The requested accommodation is reasonable and necessary to make housing available to an individual with disabilities protected under the Fair Housing Laws; Page 634 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 31 of 69 3. The requested accommodation will not impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the City, as defined in the Fair Housing Laws and interpretive case law; and 4. The requested accommodation will not require a fundamental alteration in the nature of the City’s zoning or building laws, policies and/or procedures, as defined in the Fair Housing Laws and interpretive case law. The City may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors in determining whether the requested accommodation would require a fundamental alteration in the nature of the City’s zoning or building program: a. Whether the requested accommodation would introduce uses not otherwise permitted in the neighborhood; and b. Whether granting the requested accommodation would substantially undermine any express purpose of either the City’s General Plan or an applicable Specific Plan. F. Decision. 1. The review authority shall consider an application and issue a written determination within forty (40) calendar days of the date of receipt of a completed application. 2. If necessary to reach a determination on any request for reasonable accommodation, the review authority may request further information from the applicant consistent with this section, specifying in detail what information is required. In the event a request for further information is made, the applicable time period to issue a written determination shall be stayed until the applicant reasonably responds to the request. 3. The review authority’s written decision shall set forth the findings, any conditions of approval, notice of the right to appeal, and the right to request reasonable accommodation on the appeals process, if necessary. The decision shall be mailed to the applicant. 4. The reasonable accommodation shall be subject to any reasonable conditions imposed on the approval that are consistent with the purposes of this section. 5. In making the approval findings in subsection (D) of this section, the Page 635 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 32 of 69 review authority may approve alternative reasonable accommodations that provide an equivalent level of benefit to the applicant. 6. The written decision of the reviewing authority shall be final unless appealed in the manner set forth below. 7. While a request for reasonable accommodation is pending, all laws and regulations otherwise applicable to the property that is the subject of the request shall remain in full force and effect. 8. Where the improvements or modifications approved through a reasonable accommodation would generally require a variance, a variance shall not be required. 9. The applicant may request additional time beyond that provided for in this section or may request a continuance regarding any decision or consideration by the City of a pending appeal. Extensions of time sought by applicants shall not be considered delay on the part of the City, shall not constitute failure by the City to provide for prompt decisions on applications and shall not be a violation of any required time period set forth in this section. G. Appeals. An appeal of the Director’s decision may only be filed by the applicant of the reasonable accommodation request. Appeals shall be processed pursuant to 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). H. Expiration, Extensions, and Revocations. 1. Expiration and Extensions. Approved reasonable accommodations may expire or be extended pursuant to 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). 2. Revocation. Reasonable accommodations that have been previously approved, may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). 3. Amendments. A request for changes in conditions of approval of a reasonable accommodation, or a change to plans that would affect a condition of approval shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.100 (Minor Modifications and Amendments). Page 636 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 33 of 69 EXHIBIT D CHAPTER 17.04 – DEFINITIONS Section 17.04.040 (General definitions) of Chapter 17.04 (Definitions) of Title 17 (zoning) is hereby amended to include the following definitions in alphabetical order. Unless modified herein, all other definitions shall remain as currently written. Section 17.04.040 – General Definitions Aggrieved Person means any person who, in person or through a representative, appeared at a public hearing or responded to a public notice, in connection with a city decision or action, or who, by other appropriate means before a hearing, decision or action by the review authority made their concern known or who for good cause was unable to do either. Building Official means the Building Official of the City of Hermosa Beach. Director means the same as “Director of community development”. Ministerial Review means an action process that requires a review of objective criteria established in the code and requires no personal judgment. Page 637 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 34 of 69 EXHIBIT E CHAPTER 17.60 – ZONING CLEARANCE Chapter 17.60 (Determination of Legality of Nonconforming Residential Buildings) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.60 (Zoning Clearance) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.60 Zoning Clearance 17.60.010 Purpose. The purpose of a Zoning Clearance is to ensure that a proposed use, structure, or matter requiring ministerial review complies with the standards, limitations, and other applicable regulations of the Title. 17.60.020 Applicability A Zoning Clearance is required for any proposed construction or the establishment of a use requiring a ministerial review as specified in this Title. 17.60.030 Review Authority The Community Development Department may grant a Zoning Clearance when required by this Title. 17.60.040 Procedures. A. Application. Applications for Zoning Clearance shall be filed with the Community Development Department on application forms prescribed by the Director. Zoning clearance applications for proposed uses or structures may be processed independent of or concurrently with other applications as determined by the Community Development Director. B. Processing. Applications for Zoning Clearances shall be processed in a timely manner with a decision rendered no more than 15-days from receipt of a complete application. 1. Notwithstanding above, permits for accessory dwelling units and/or junior accessory dwelling units shall be decided within 60-day days of receipt of a complete application and subject to the provisions outlined in Chapter 17.21. Page 638 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 35 of 69 C. Report of Decision and Findings. Action by the Director shall be made pursuant to Section 17.03.070 (Findings and Notice of Action). 17.60.050 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation A. Appeals. Ministerial or non-discretionary Zoning Clearances are not eligible for appeal, except where required by State law and in such case shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Zoning Clearance may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Zoning Clearance shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). Page 639 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 36 of 69 EXHIBIT F CHAPTER 17.62 – ADMINISTRATIVE PERMITS Chapter 17.62 (Planning Commission Authority – Building Code) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.62 (Administrative Permit) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.62 Administrative Permit 17.62.010 Purpose The purpose of an Administrative Permit is to ensure that a proposed use or matter for which an Administrative Permit is required complies with the standards, limitations and other regulations applicable to the subject use or matter. 17.62.020 Applicability Approval of an Administrative Permit is required for uses or developments specifically identified in any section of this Title. 17.62.030 Review Authority The Community Development Director of their designee may grant Administrative Permits for all such uses and matters required by this Title to be reviewed and allowed only upon the granting of an Administrative Permit. 17.62.040 Procedures A. Application Filing. Applications for Administrative Permits shall be filed with the Community Development Department on the prescribed application forms pursuant to Section 17.03.020 (Application Forms and Fees) and Section 17.03.0.30 (Review of Applications). The application for an administrative application shall include data or evidence supporting the required findings. B. Report of Decisions and Findings. Approval will be based upon determining the request complies with applicable standards and regulations and may include conditions necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. 17.62.050 Required Findings The Director shall make all of the following findings to approve or conditionally approve an Administrative Permit application. The inability to make one or more of the findings is grounds for denial of an application. Written findings shall be Page 640 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 37 of 69 prepared when a denial decision is rendered. A. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone with Administrative Permit approval, and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Ordinance and the Municipal Code; B. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; C. The site is physically adequate for the type, density, and intensity (e.g., number of employees and customers) of use being proposed, including provision of services (e.g., sanitation and water), public access, and the absence of physical constraints; D. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the land uses on site and in the vicinity of the subject property; and E. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the proposed use at the location proposed will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a menace to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed use. 17.62.060 Conditions of Approval The Community Development Director may impose reasonable conditions deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the findings for an Administrative Permit. 17.62.070 Appeals; Expiration, Revocation A. Appeals. Appeals of Administrative Permits shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Administrative Permits may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Administrative Permits shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). Page 641 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 38 of 69 EXHIBIT G CHAPTER 17.66 – MINOR EXCEPTION Chapter 17.66 (Amendments) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.66 (Minor Exception) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.66 Minor Exception 17.66.010 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to establish a means of granting minor relief development standards.. 17.66.020 Applicability The following changes to development standards may be approved through a Minor Exception. A. Up to ten percent reductions in setback and open space requirements for existing buildings; B. Projections where existing setbacks conform except for projections at local points in the building walls, such as for bay windows when the length parallel to the wall of any such projection is no greater than eight feet, or when the existing projecting element is no closer than three feet from the property line and no greater than one-quarter of the total length of the wall from which it projects; C. Eaves, to match the existing eave projection when adding to an existing building, and when the new eave will also conform to the requirements of the California Building Code; D. The enlargement of windows in nonconforming buildings, and other minor structural alterations in nonconforming buildings, provided there is no increase in total floor area; E. Up to a ten percent reduction in parking stall dimensions for structural reasons, when providing parking in existing buildings; F. Arbors or trellises in rear yards, for privacy, when the grade of the adjacent property is higher than that of the subject property. Sides and tops of arbors and trellises are to be made only of framework or latticework, and must be at least fifty (50) percent open. Page 642 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 39 of 69 17.66.030 Review Authority The Community Development Director shall act as the review authority for Minor Exceptions. However, the Director may refer any application for a Minor Exception for a project that may generate substantial public controversy or involve significant land use policy decisions to the Planning Commission for decision. A. Concurrent Processing. If a request for a Minor Exception is being submitted in conjunction with an application for another approval, permit, or entitlement that requires Planning Commission action, it shall be heard and acted upon at the same time and in the same manner as that application. 17.66.040 Procedures A. Application. An application for a Minor Exception shall be filed to the Community Development Department on the application forms prescribed by the Director. B. Public Notice. An application for a Minor Exception shall require a public notice prior to the Director’s decision pursuant to Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice). C. Report of Decisions and Findings. Except as set forth below, the Community Development Director shall issue the Minor Exception no more than thirty (30) days following the filing of a complete application. 17.66.050 Required Findings The Community Development Director shall make all of the following findings to approve or conditionally approve a minor exception application. The inability to make one or more of the findings is grounds for denial of an application. 1. The requested minor exception is warranted by practical difficulties; 2. The requested minor exception is necessary to avoid inconsistencies with the general intent of this Title; and 3. The requested minor exception for the same development standard has not been approved within the last 10 years. Page 643 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 40 of 69 17.66.060 Conditions of Approval In approving a Minor Exception, the review authority may impose reasonable conditions or restrictions and/or require reasonable guarantees and evidence that such conditions are being, or will be, complied with, to achieve the findings for a Minor Exception. 17.66.070 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation A. Appeals. Appeals of Minor Exceptions shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Minor Exception may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Minor Exception shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). Page 644 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 41 of 69 EXHIBIT H CHAPTER 17.68 – MINOR USE PERMITS Chapter 17.68 (Procedure, Hearings, Notices and Fees) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.68 (Minor Use Permits) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.68 Minor Use Permits 17.68.010 Purpose The Minor Use Permit review and approval process is intended to apply to uses that are consistent with the with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and purposes of the zone where they are proposed but require special consideration to ensure that based on the specifics can be designed, located, and operated in a manner that will be compatible with the surrounding area and uses. 17.68.020 Applicability Approval of a Minor Use Permit is required for uses or developments specifically identified in any section of this Title which requires a Minor Use Permit. 17.68.030 Review Authority The Community Development Director or designee shall be the review authority for Minor Use Permits. However, the Director may refer any application for a Minor Use Permit for a project that may generate substantial public controversy or involve significant land use policy decisions to the Planning Commission for decision. 17.68.040 Procedures A. Application. Applications for Minor Use Permits shall be filed with the Community Development Department on application forms as prescribed by the Director. B. Public Notice and Hearing. All applications for Minor Use Permits shall require a public notice prior to the Director or designee decision, pursuant to Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice). Page 645 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 42 of 69 C. Report of Decisions and Findings. Except as set forth below, the Community Development Director shall issue the Minor Use Permit no more than thirty (30) days following the filing of a complete application. 17.68.050 Required Findings The Community Development Director or designee must make all of the following findings to approve or conditionally approve a Minor Use application. The inability to make one or more of the findings is grounds for denial of an application. A. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Title and all other Titles of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code;  B. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan;  C. The proposed use will not be averse to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the community, nor detrimental to surrounding properties or improvements;  D. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity are compatible with the land uses and circulation in the vicinity; and  E. The site is physically suitable for the type of the use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints.  17.68.060 Conditions of Approval In approving a Minor Use Permit, the review authority may impose reasonable conditions or restrictions and/or require reasonable guarantees and evidence that such conditions are being, or will be, complied with, to achieve the following outcomes: A. Ensure that the proposal conforms in all significant respects with the General Plan and with any other applicable plans or policies adopted by the City Council; B. Achieve the general purposes of this Title or the specific purpose of the zone in which the project is located; Page 646 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 43 of 69 C. Achieve the findings for a Minor Use Permit listed in Section 17.68.050; or D. Mitigate any potentially significant impacts identified because of environmental review conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 17.68.070 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation A. Appeals. Appeals of Minor Use Permits shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Minor Use Permit may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Minor Use Permit shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). D. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Minor Use Permit has become final, no further application for the same use shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fees. Page 647 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 44 of 69 EXHIBIT I CHAPTER 17.70 – CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Chapter 17.70 (Revocation and Expiration) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.70 (Conditional Use Permit) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.70 Conditional Use Permits 17.70.010 Purpose. The purpose of a Conditional Use Permit shall be to provide for the individual review of certain uses, which due to the nature of the use, size, or intensity of the use requires a Planning Commission review. 17.70.020 Applicability Approval of a Conditional Use Permit is required for uses or developments specifically identified in any section of this Title which requires a Conditional Use Permit. 17.70.030 Review Authority The Planning Commission may grant Conditional Use Permits to determine if the use proposed, or the location of that use, is compatible with the surrounding uses, or may be made compatible with the imposition of conditions of approval. 17.70.040 Procedures A. Application. Applications for Conditional Use Permits shall be filed with the Community Development Department on application forms prescribed by the Director. B. Public Notice. An application for a Conditional Use Permit shall require a public notice prior to the Planning Commission hearing, pursuant to Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice). C. Public Hearing. An application for a Conditional Use Permit shall require a public hearing before the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 17.03.060 (Conduct of Public Hearings). Page 648 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 45 of 69 D. Report on Findings and Decision. Not more than twenty (20) days following the public hearing on a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission shall announce its findings by formal resolution and said resolution shall recite, among other things, the facts and reasons which, in its opinion, make the granting or denial of the Conditional Use Permit and when granted, shall recite such conditions and limitations as it may impose. 17.70.050 Required findings. The Planning Commission must make all of the following findings to approve a Conditional Use Permit application. The inability to make one or more of the findings is grounds for denial of an application. A. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Title and all other Titles of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code; B. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; C. The proposed use will not be averse to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the community, nor detrimental to surrounding properties or improvements; D. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity are compatible with the land uses and circulation in the vicinity; and E. The site is physically suitable for the type of the use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints. 17.70.060 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation A. Appeals. Appeals of Conditional Use Permits shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Conditional Use Permit may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Conditional Use Permit shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). Page 649 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 46 of 69 D. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Conditional Use Permit has become final, no further application for the same use shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fees. Page 650 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 47 of 69 EXHIBIT J CHAPTER 17.72 – PARKING PLAN Chapter 17.72 (Permits, Licenses, Restrictions and Covenants) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.72 (Parking Plan) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.72 Parking Plan 17.72.010 Purpose The purpose of this section is to allow for an alternative configuration of parking to wholly or partially satisfy the Off-Street Parking Chapter of Title 17. 17.72.020 Applicability Parking Plans may be requested by a property owner in accordance with the Off- Street Parking Chapter of Title 17. 17.72.030 Review Authority The Planning Commission shall act as the review authority for all Parking plans. 17.72.040 Procedures A. Application. Applications for Parking Plans shall be filed with the Community Development Department on application forms prescribed by the Community Development Director. B. Public Notice. An application for a Parking Plan shall require a public notice prior to the Planning Commission decision, pursuant to Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice) C. Public Hearing. An application for a Parking Plan shall require a public hearing before the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 17.03.060 (Conduct of Public Hearings). 17.72.050 Required Findings The Planning Commission must make all of the following findings to approve or conditionally approve a Parking Plan application. The inability to make one or more the findings is ground for denial of an application. Page 651 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 48 of 69 A. The Parking Plan conforms in all significant respects with the General Plan and with any other applicable plans or policies adopted by the City Council; B. The Parking Plan is consistent with the purposes of this Title and the specific purpose of the Zone in which the project is located; C. The Parking Plan satisfies all the applicable criteria for the Parking Plan configuration requested in accordance with the Off-Street Parking Chapter of Title 17; and D. The granting of the requested modification would not be detrimental to the public, health, safety or welfare of the public. 17.72.060 Conditions of Approval In approving a Parking Plan, the review authority may impose reasonable conditions or restrictions and/or require reasonable guarantees and evidence that such conditions are being, or will be, complied with, to achieve the following outcomes: A. Ensure that the proposal complies with the general purpose of Title 17 or the specific procedures of the zone in which the project is located; B. Achieve the findings for the Parking Plan listed in Section 17.72.050 (Required Findings). C. A covenant with the City a party thereto, may be required limiting the use of the property and/or designating the method by which the required parking will be provided at the time that the Planning Commission determines that inadequate parking exists. 17.72.070 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation A. Appeals. Appeals of Parking Plan shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Parking Plan may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). Page 652 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 49 of 69 C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Parking Plan shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). D. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Parking Plan has become final, no further application for the same use shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fees. Page 653 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 50 of 69 EXHIBIT K CHAPTER 17.74 – PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Chapter 17.74 (Penalty) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.74 (Precise Development Plan)) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.74 Precise Development Plans 17.74.010 Purpose This Chapter establishes Precise Development Plan procedures to ensure that new development supports the goals and objectives of the General Plan and other adopted plans and guidelines. The specific purposes of the Precise Development Plan process are to: A. Promote excellence in design, layout, and other physical features of development to achieve a reasonable level of quality, compatibility, in harmony with the community’s social, economic and environmental objectives; B. Ensure that new and altered development will be compatible with the existing and potential development of the surrounding area; and C. Supplement other City regulations and standards in order to ensure control of physical features of development that are not otherwise addressed. 17.74.020 Applicability A Major or Minor Precise Development Plan, as specified in Section 17.74.025, is required for all projects that require a permit for new construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, alteration, or other improvements to a structure, site, or a parking area except for: A. New construction or additions of less than 1,500 square foot addition any zone. B. Interior remodel of 3,000 square feet or less, with no exterior changes, in any zone. C. Single Family (one unit) residential projects and any related accessory structures. Page 654 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 51 of 69 D. New residential projects with two (2) or more dwelling units including a minimum of 20% lower-income units. E. Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units. F. Dwelling Units provided pursuant to California Government Code Section 6585.21, commonly referred to as SB 9 units or urban dwelling units. 17.74.025 Minor and Major Precise Development Plan A. Minor Precise Development Plan. A Minor Precise Development Plan shall be required for the following: 1. Residential only projects with only 2-4 dwelling units. 2. Mixed use projects that do not exceed four dwelling units or 3,000 square feet of non-residential floor area. 3. Interior remodel greater than 3,000 square feet, with no exterior changes, in any zone. B. Major Precise Development Plan. A Major Precise Development Plan shall be required for the following: 1. Residential only projects with 5 or more dwelling units. 2. Mixed use development with five or more dwelling units or include a nonresidential floor area of 3,001 square feet or greater, regardless of the number of units. 3. Any nonresidential project that is not exempt or qualifies for a Minor Precise Development Plan. 17.74.030 Review Authority The Director shall act as the review authority of Minor Precise Development Plans and the Planning Commission shall act as the review authority for Major Precise Development Plans. 17.74.040 Procedures Page 655 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 52 of 69 A. Application. Applications for Precise Development Plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department on application forms prescribed by the Director. B. Public Notice. An application for a Precise Develop Plan shall require a public notice prior to the review authority’s decision, pursuant to Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice). C. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Parking Plan has become final, no further application for the same Parking Plan shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fee. D. Public Hearing. No public hearing shall be required for an application for a Minor Precise Development Plans. An application for a Major Precise Development Plan shall require a public hearing before the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 17.03.060 (Conduct of Public Hearings). 17.74.050 Required Findings The review authority must make all of the following findings to approve or conditionally approve a Precise Development Plan application. The inability to make one or more of the findings is grounds for denial of an application. A. The design, layout, and other physical features of the project complies with all other applicable provisions of this Title and all other Titles of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code; B. The design, layout, and other physical features of the project is consistent with the General Plan, and any applicable specific plan or design guidelines; C. The design, layout, and other physical features of the project complies with any design or development standards applicable to the zone or the use in question, unless waived or modified pursuant to the provisions of this Title; and D. The design, layout, and other physical features of the project are compatible with the desired form and character of the area, as established in the General Plan. 17.74.060 Conditions of Approval Page 656 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 53 of 69 In approving a Precise Development Plan, the review authority may impose reasonable conditions or restrictions and/or require reasonable guarantees and evidence that such conditions are being, or will be, complied with, to achieve the following outcomes: A. Ensure that the proposal conforms in all significant respects with the General Plan and with any other applicable plans or policies adopted by the City Council; B. Achieve the general purposes of this Title or the specific purpose of the zone in which the project is located; C. Achieve the findings for a Precise Development Plan listed in Section TBD, Required Findings; and D. Mitigate any potentially significant impacts identified because of environmental review conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 17.74.070 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation A. Appeals. Appeals of Precise Development Plan shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Precise Development Plan may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Precise Development Plan shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). D. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Precise Development Plan has become final, no further application for the same use shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fees. Page 657 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 54 of 69 EXHIBIT L CHAPTER 17.76 – VARIANCES Chapter 17.76 (Conditional use permits) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.76 (Variances) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.76 Variances 17.76.010 Purpose This Chapter is intended to provide a mechanism for relief from the strict application of this Title where it would deprive the property owner of privileges enjoyed by similar properties because of the subject property’s unique and special conditions. 17.76.020 Applicability Variances may be granted to vary or modify development standards but may not be granted to allow uses or activities that this Title does not authorize for a specific lot or site. 17.76.030 Review Authority The Planning Commission shall act as the review authority for Variance applications based on consideration of the requirements of this Chapter. 17.76.040 Procedures A. Application. Applications for a Variance shall be filed with the Community Development Department on application forms prescribed by the Director. B. Public Notice. An application for a Variance shall require a public notice prior to the Planning Commission decision, pursuant to Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice). C. Public Hearing. An application for a Variance shall require a public hearing before the Planning Commission, pursuant to Section 17.03.060 (Conduct of Public Hearings). 17.76.050 Required Findings After conducting a public hearing, the Planning Commission must make all of the Page 658 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 55 of 69 following findings in order to approve or conditionally approve a Variance application. The Commission shall deny an application for a Variance if it is unable to make any of the required findings, in which case it shall state the reasons for that determination. A. There are exceptional or extraordinary physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the vicinity and identical zone, and that the granting of a Variance will not constitute a granting of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on the property in the vicinity and identical zone; B. The granting of the Variance is necessary to prevent a physical hardship which is not of the applicant’s own actions or the actions of a predecessor in interest; C. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and D. The granting of the Variance will be consistent with the general purposes and objectives of this Title, any applicable specific plans, and the General Plan. 17.76.060 Conditions of Approval In approving a Variance, the review authority may impose reasonable conditions or restrictions and/or require reasonable guarantees and evidence that such conditions are being, or will be, complied with, to achieve the following outcomes: A. Ensure that the proposal conforms in all significant respects with the General Plan and with any other applicable plans or policies adopted by the City Council; B. Achieve the general purposes of this Title or the specific purposes of the zone in which the project is located; C. Achieve the findings for a Variance granted; or D. Mitigate any potentially significant impacts identified because of review conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Page 659 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 56 of 69 17.76.070 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation A. Appeals. Appeals of Variances shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Variances may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Variances shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). D. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Variances has become final, no further application for the same use shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fees. Page 660 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 57 of 69 EXHIBIT M CHAPTER 17.78 – COASTAL CLEARANCE Chapter 17.78 (Coastal Clearance) added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.78 Coastal Clearance 17.78.010 Purpose The purpose of this section is to ensure all public and private development in the Coastal Zone receives a clearance confirming the development conforms to all provisions of Title 16, Title 17, and any Land Use Plan or Coastal Development Permit. 17.78.020 Applicability This Section shall apply to all development in the Coastal Zone, as defined by the Coastal Act. 17.78.030 Review Authority A request for Coastal Clearance may be submitted with another application. The review authority shall be in accordance with the Section 17.02.050 Review Authorities for Decisions and Appeals. 17.78.040 Procedure A. Application. Applications for Coastal Clearance shall be filed with the Community Development Department on application forms prescribed by the Director. B. Conditions of Approval. Prior to permit issuance of any development within the Coastal Zone the applicant shall demonstrate an approval, wavier, or exemption by the California Coastal Commission. C. Post-Approval. Before permit issuance, the Community Development Director or designee shall review the California Coastal Commission’s approval, waiver, or exemption for consistency with the Director’s approval in concept. Page 661 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 58 of 69 EXHIBIT N CHAPTER 17.80 – DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS Chapter 17.80 (Certificates of occupancy) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.80 (Development Agreements) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.80 Development Agreements 17.80.010 Purpose This Chapter establishes procedures and requirements for considering and entering into a voluntary legally binding agreements, with applicants for development projects, as authorized in Government Code Sections 65864- 65869.5. The development agreement is intended to provide assurance to the City that a proposed project will proceed to its completion in compliance with the plans submitted and provides assurance to the applicant that the project can proceed to its completion in accordance with the rules and regulations in effect at the time of project approval. 17.80.020 Applicability A voluntary agreement that may be initiated by a property owner, or by the Director, for a complex or multi-phase development project that is consistent with the General Plan. 17.80.030 Review Authority The Planning Commission shall act as the advisory body for all Development Agreements and provide its recommendation to the City Council. The City Council shall act as the review authority, and after receiving recommendations from the Planning Commission, may adopt, reject, or modify a Development Agreement. 17.80.040 Procedures A. Processing Proposed Development Agreements. A Development Agreement which may be proposed by the City or any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property shall be processed in the manner of a Zone Change as provided in Article 15 and shall conform to the requirements of Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 65864) Division 1, of the Government Code entitled "Development Agreements." Page 662 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 59 of 69 B. Development Agreement Content All development agreements shall contain the following provisions: 1. Duration of the agreement; 2. Permitted uses for the subject property; 3. Density or intensity of the permitted uses; 4. Approved site plans, elevations, floor plans and sections, including the maximum height and size of proposed buildings; 5. Provisions, if any, for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes or other contribution to public improvements and amenities of benefit to the City; 6. Protection from either a future growth control ordinance or a future increase in development impact fees; 7. Provisions that address the applicable environmental review for the project; 8. Provisions requiring periodic review of the Development Agreement; 9. Provisions that would necessitate a reconsideration or amendment of the development agreement if any health and safety issues of compelling public necessity are discovered (i.e., a new environmental health hazard is discovered); 10. Provisions for the expiration and extension of said expiration of the agreement. 11. Provisions to amend or cancel, in whole or in part, by mutual consent of all parties to the agreement, or their successor-in-interest, in compliance with state law (Government Code Section 65868). 12. Provisions which are appropriate and acceptable to the City Attorney, that the developer shall commence construction or satisfy other requirements within a specified timeframe; and 13. Any other terms determined to be appropriate and necessary including provisions for payment to the City. Page 663 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 60 of 69 C. Periodic Review Requirement. 1. The Planning Commission shall review the Development Agreement every 12 months, unless otherwise specified in the Development Agreement, after the approval of the agreement for the life of the project to determine whether the contracting party or the successor has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement. 2. The applicant shall initiate the review by filing a request for review along with the corresponding fee established by City Council within 60 days prior to the anniversary of the date of approval. The applicant shall submit evidence demonstrating the applicant’s good-faith compliance with the Development Agreement. 3. If as a result of this review, the Planning Commission finds and determines time of annual review, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the contracting party or the successor in interest has not complied with, a report shall be made the City Council, and referred to the City Attorney’s office for action. 17.80.050 Required Findings The following findings shall be made before approval of a Development Agreement or amendment: A. The Development Agreement is in the best interests of the City, promoting the public interest and welfare through public benefits; and B. The Development Agreement is consistent with all applicable provisions of the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and this Zoning Ordinance. Page 664 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 61 of 69 EXHIBIT O CHAPTER 17.82 – SPECIFIC PLANS Chapter 17.82 (Specific Plans) is hereby added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.82 Specific Plans 17.82.010 Purpose This Chapter establishes procedures for the consideration, adoption, and implementation of specific plans for the purpose of implementing the General Plan on an area-specific basis. 17.82.020 Applicability A. The procedures in this Chapter shall apply to all proposals to establish a Specific Plan Area, amend or a Specific Plan Area. When changes to the Zoning Ordinance or zone or boundary line shown on the Zoning Map are required, a Zoning Amendment shall also be required. B. Initiation of Amendment. A Specific Plan or amendment to a Specific Plan may be initiated by the owner of the subject property, the Director, by motion of the Planning Commission, or by a motion of the City Council 17.82.030 Review Authority The Planning Commission shall act as the advisory body for all proposed Specific Plans and Specific Plan Amendments. The Planning Commission shall provide recommendations to the City Council. The City Council shall act as the final review authority and upon receiving a recommendation from the Planning Commission, may adopt, reject, or modify a Specific Plan. 17.82.040 Procedures A. Application. Applications for Specific Plans shall be filed with the Community Development Department on application forms prescribed by the Director. B. Public Hearing and Notice. All Specific Plan and Specific Plan Amendments shall be referred to the Planning Commission, which shall conduct at least one public hearing on any proposed amendment prior to submitting a Page 665 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 62 of 69 recommendation report to the City Council. At least ten (10) days before the date of any public hearing, the City shall provide notice as provided for in Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice). C. Planning Commission Hearing. Before submitting a recommendation to the City Council, the Planning Commission shall conduct at least one public hearing. D. Recommendation to City Council. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation on the Specific Plan to the City Council. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the recommendation, findings related to General Plan consistency, and a discussion of the relationship of the proposed amendment to other adopted documents. The recommendation shall be transmitted to the City Council with a copy of the approved minutes from the Planning Commission hearing. 1. Approval. If the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed amendment, the City Council is required to take final action pursuant to Section TBD, City Council Hearing and Action. 2. Denial. If the Planning Commission has recommended against the proposed amendment, the City Council is not required to take any further action unless an appeal is filed in accordance with Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review) E. City Council Hearing and Action 1. City Council Hearing. After receiving the recommendation from the Planning Commission, the City Council shall hold a hearing in accordance with Section TBD, Conduct of Public Hearings. The notice for the hearing shall include a summary of the Planning Commission recommendation. 2. City Council Action. After the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may approve, modify, or deny the proposed Specific Plan or Specific Plan amendment. F. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Specific Plan has become final, no further application for the same Specific Plan shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Page 666 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 63 of 69 1. Determination if the new application has resolved the review authority’s previous objections shall be made by the Director. 2. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fee. 17.82.050 Required Findings The following findings shall be made prior to approval of any specific plan or specific plan amendment: A. The specific plan or amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan; B. The specific plan or amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare; C. The specific plan or amendment is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties, and ensures development of desirable character that will be harmonious with surrounding properties; D. The specific plan or amendment is suitable and appropriate for the location, access, and topography for the development of the subject property; 17.82.060 Amendments A Specific Plan may be amended in the same manner as a new Specific Plan is adopted. Page 667 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 64 of 69 EXHIBIT P CHAPTER 17.84 – ZONING AMENDMENTS Chapter 17.84 (Zoning Amendments) is hereby added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.84 Zoning Amendments 17.84.010 Purpose This Chapter establishes procedures by which changes may be made to the text of this Zoning Ordinance and to the Zoning Map, whenever the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good practice justify such amendment, consistent with the General Plan. 17.84.020 Applicability A. The procedures in this Chapter shall apply to all proposals to change the text of this Zoning Ordinance or to revise a zone or boundary line shown on the Zoning Map. B. Initiation of Amendment. An amendment to the Zoning Ordinance may be initiated by the Director, by motion of the Planning Commission, or by a motion of the City Council. An amendment to the Zoning Map may be initiated by the owner of the subject property, the Director, by motion of the Planning Commission, or by a motion of the City Council. 17.84.030 Review Authority The Planning Commission shall act as the advisory body for all amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map and provide recommendations to the City Council. The City Council shall act as the final review authority and upon receiving a recommendation from the Planning Commission, may adopt, reject, or modify all zoning amendments. 17.84.040 Procedures A. Application. Applications for Zoning Amendments shall be filed with the Community Development Department on application forms prescribed by the Director. B. Public Hearing and Notice. All amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map shall be referred to the Planning Commission, which shall conduct at least one public hearing on any proposed amendment prior to Page 668 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 65 of 69 submitting a recommendation report to the City Council. At least 20 days before the date of any public hearing, the City shall provide notice as provided for in Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice). C. Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation 1. Planning Commission Hearing. Before submitting a recommendation to the City Council, the Planning Commission shall conduct at least one public hearing. 2. Recommendation to City Council. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation on the proposed amendment to the City Council. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the recommendation, findings related to General Plan consistency, and a discussion of the relationship of the proposed amendment to other adopted documents. The recommendation shall be transmitted to the City Council with a copy of the approved minutes from the Planning Commission hearing. a. Approval. If the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed amendment, the City Council is required to take final action. b. Denial. If the Planning Commission has recommended against the proposed amendment, the City Council is not required to take any further action unless an appeal is filed in accordance with Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). c. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Zoning Amendment has become final, no further application for the same Zoning Amendment shall be filed for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. i. Determination if the new application has resolved the review authority’s previous objections shall be made by the Director. ii. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fee. D. City Council Hearing and Action Page 669 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 66 of 69 1. City Council Hearing. After receiving the recommendation from the Planning Commission, the City Council shall hold a hearing in accordance with Section 17.03.060 (Conduct of Public Hearings). The notice for the hearing shall include a summary of the Planning Commission recommendation. 2. City Council Action. After the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may approve, modify, or deny the proposed amendment. If the Council proposes any substantial revision not previously considered by the Planning Commission during its hearings, the proposed revision shall first be referred to the Planning Commission for report and recommendation, but the Planning Commission shall not be required to hold a public hearing. The failure of the Planning Commission to report within 45 days after the referral shall be deemed a recommendation for approval and the amendment shall be returned to Council for adoption. 17.84.050 Required Findings The following findings shall be made prior to approval of any Zoning Amendment: A. The amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; B. The amendment is consistent with the intent of the vision, goals and objectives, and policies of general plan; and C. The amendment is consistent with the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, Title 17. Page 670 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 67 of 69 EXHIBIT Q CHAPTER 17.84 – ZONING AMENDMENTS Chapter 17.86 (General Plan Amendment) is hereby added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.86 General Plan Amendment 17.86.010 Purpose This chapter establishes procedures for making changes to the General Plan as provided for in State Law when there are necessary reasons to do so as a result of changes in conditions or circumstances unforeseen at the time of adoption or last amendment of the General Plan. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, changes in State or Federal law and problems and opportunities that were unanticipated at the time of adoption or last amendment. 17.86.020 Applicability The procedures in this Chapter shall apply to all proposals to change the text of the General Plan or to change a general plan designation or boundary line as shown on the General Plan Map. 17.86.030 Initiation of Amendment. An amendment to the text of the General Plan may be initiated by the Director, by motion of the Planning Commission, or by a motion of the City Council. An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map may be initiated by the owner of the subject property, the Director, by motion of the Planning Commission, or by a motion of the City Council. 17.86.040 Review Authority The Planning Commission shall act as the advisory body for all amendments to City’s General Plan and General Plan Map and provide recommendations to the City Council. The City Council shall act as the final review authority and upon receiving a recommendation from the Planning Commission, may adopt, reject, or modify all general plan or general plan map amendments. 17.86.050 Procedures B. Application. Applications for General Plan Amendment shall be filed with the Community Development Department on application forms prescribed by the Director. Page 671 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 68 of 69 C. Public Hearing and Notice. All amendments to the General Plan and General Plan Land Use Map shall be referred to the Planning Commission, which shall conduct at least one public hearing on any proposed amendment prior to submitting a recommendation report to the City Council. At least 20 days before the date of any public hearing, the City shall provide notice as provided for in Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice). D. Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation. Before submitting a recommendation to the City Council, the Planning Commission shall conduct at least one public hearing. E. Recommendation to City Council. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation on the proposed amendment to the City Council. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the recommendation, findings related to General Plan consistency, and a discussion of the relationship of the proposed amendment to other adopted documents. The recommendation shall be transmitted to the City Council with a copy of the approved minutes from the Planning Commission hearing. 1. Approval. If the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed amendment, the City Council is required to take final action. 2. Denial. If the Planning Commission has recommended against the proposed amendment, the City Council is not required to take any further action unless an appeal is filed in accordance with Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). 3. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Geneal Plan Amendment has become final, no further application for the same General Plan Amendment shall be filed for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. a. Determination if the new application has resolved the review authority’s previous objections shall be made by the Director. b. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fee. F. City Council Hearing and Action. Page 672 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 69 of 69 1. City Council Hearing. After receiving the recommendation from the Planning Commission, the City Council shall hold a hearing in accordance with Section 17.03.060 (Conduct of Public Hearings). The notice for the hearing shall include a summary of the Planning Commission recommendation. 2. City Council Action. After the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may approve, modify, or deny the proposed amendment. If the Council proposes any substantial revision not previously considered by the Planning Commission during its hearings, the proposed revision shall first be referred to the Planning Commission for report and recommendation, but the Planning Commission shall not be required to hold a public hearing. The failure of the Planning Commission to report within 45 days after the referral shall be deemed a recommendation for approval and the amendment shall be returned to Council for adoption. 17.86.060 Required Findings A. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city, as specified under Government Code Section 65358(as); B. That adoption of the proposed General Plan amendment will not exceed the annual limit on amendments specified under Government Code Section 65358(b); and C. The amendment is consistent with the intent of the vision, goals and objectives, and policies of the General Plan and internally consistent. Page 673 of 1339 HERMOSA BEACH HB ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH May 2020 Page 674 of 1339 Page 675 of 1339 i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................1 The Project ................................................................................................................................ 1 This Paper ................................................................................................................................. 2 Next Steps ................................................................................................................................. 3 2 What is Zoning? ................................................................................................4 What Zoning Can Do .............................................................................................................. 4 What Zoning Cannot Do ........................................................................................................ 5 The Basic Dilemma: Flexibility vs. Certainty .......................................................................... 5 Users’ Perspectives ............................................................................................................ 5 Tradeoffs ......................................................................................................................... 8 3 Usability .............................................................................................................9 Organization and Style ........................................................................................................... 9 Code Complexity .................................................................................................................. 11 Lack of Clear Definitions and Rules of Measurement ....................................................... 11 Underutilized Tables .............................................................................................................. 12 Absence of Illustrations ......................................................................................................... 13 4 Zones ...............................................................................................................14 Zones to Implement PLAN Hermosa ................................................................................... 14 Streamline Existing Zones ...................................................................................................... 15 Zone Presentation and Organization .................................................................................. 15 Page 676 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach ii 5 Development Standards ...............................................................................16 Physical Form and Design Related Standards ................................................................... 17 Tailor Standards to Reflect Character Areas ..................................................................... 18 Objective Design Standards ................................................................................................ 18 Residential Development .............................................................................................. 19 Mixed-Use Development ............................................................................................... 20 Provide Flexibility .................................................................................................................... 21 6 Use Regulations ..............................................................................................22 Adopt a Use Classification System ...................................................................................... 23 Reflect Contemporary Land Uses ....................................................................................... 23 Ensure All Zones Allow Appropriate Land Uses .................................................................. 23 Standards for Specific Uses .................................................................................................. 24 7 Parking Requirements ....................................................................................25 Reduce or Eliminate Minimum Parking Requirements ...................................................... 26 Exempt Small Commercial Establishments .................................................................. 27 Exempt or Reduce Parking Requirements for Changes of Use ................................. 27 8 Development Review and Approval ...........................................................28 Reliance on Discretionary Review ....................................................................................... 28 Adjust Review Thresholds ............................................................................................... 29 Consider a Minor Use Permit Process ........................................................................... 29 Unclear Review and Approval Procedures ....................................................................... 30 Clarify Administrative Procedures for All Decisions ..................................................... 31 Page 677 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report iii 9 Compliance with State and Federal Law ....................................................32 Housing ................................................................................................................................... 32 Housing Developments .................................................................................................. 32 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) ................................................................................... 33 Affordable Housing ......................................................................................................... 33 Housing for Persons with Disabilities .............................................................................. 33 Manufactured Housing .................................................................................................. 34 Adult Oriented Businesses .................................................................................................... 34 Coastal Act ............................................................................................................................ 34 Cottage Food Operations ................................................................................................... 35 Emergency Shelters; Transitional and Supportive Uses ..................................................... 35 Family Day Care Homes ....................................................................................................... 36 Processing and Review Procedures .................................................................................... 36 Religious Uses ......................................................................................................................... 36 Signs ........................................................................................................................................ 36 Solar Energy Systems ............................................................................................................. 36 Telecommunications............................................................................................................. 37 Water Conservation and Landscaping .............................................................................. 37 Appendix A Ordinance User Interview Summary ..........................................38 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 38 Themes .................................................................................................................................... 38 Comments .............................................................................................................................. 39 General Comments ........................................................................................................ 39 Design and Development Standards ........................................................................... 40 Land Use Regulations ..................................................................................................... 41 Parking Regulations ........................................................................................................ 43 Zoning Administration and Process .............................................................................. 44 Example References ...................................................................................................... 46 List of Interviewees ................................................................................................................ 47 Page 678 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach iv This page intentionally left blank. Page 679 of 1339 1 1 INTRODUCTION On August 22, 2017, the Hermosa Beach City Council unanimously adopted its first general plan update since 1979, PLAN Hermosa. PLAN Hermosa is the culmination of a multi-year community- wide effort to reflect on the community and its future. It incorporates many ideas from residents, City officials and staff, and others involved in the planning process and articulates a shared vision. “Hermosa Beach is the small town others aspire to be; a place where our beach culture, strong sense of community, and commitment to sustainability intersect.” Organized around a framework for sustainability, each section of the Plan addresses different aspects of the community and identifies goals and policies to guide residents, decision-makers, businesses, and City staff toward achieving the vision. The challenge now is to translate the policies related to zoning and subdivision controls into a user-friendly, legally adequate, and effective set of regulations and procedures that steer development to the most suitable places and helps the community achieve their long-term vision as a community that values small beach town character, vibrant economy and healthy environment and lifestyles. Zoning and subdivision regulations are one of the primary tools a city has for implementation of its general plan. Zoning and subdivision regulations translate the policies of a general plan into parcel-specific regulations, including land use regulations and development standards. The type and intensity of land uses that are permitted and how they perform will be critical to achieving PLAN Hermosa’s vision for neighborhood preservation and enhancement, economic development, coastal resource protection, environmental sustainability, and community health. The Project The Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment is the first phase of a two-phase effort to comprehensively update the City’s zoning and subdivision regulations and repurpose them as a more effective tool to provide the kind of development that Hermosa Beach wants, consistent with the PLAN Hermosa. The objective is to produce a user-friendly set of regulations that provide clear direction about the City’s expectations and to facilitate development of quality projects by Page 680 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 2 making standards clear and effective, streamlining review processes, and incorporating flexibility to adapt to specific circumstances. The ultimate objective for the Assessment is to set clear direction for a comprehensive Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance update. A thorough and accurate assessment will set the foundation for an updated Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance that not only complies with state law, but also: • Is consistent with and implements PLAN Hermosa; • Respects the City fabric and groundwork that has occurred overtime and reflects current uses, practices, and development patterns; • Provides clear decision-making protocols and streamlined review processes, where appropriate; • Retains the character and scale of the community’s neighborhoods, districts, and corridors; • Adds to the economic vitality and promotes adaptive reuse and reinvestment of properties; • Addresses previously created nonconforming conditions and brings them into compliance to the extent appropriate and feasible; • Complies with State and federal requirements and current case law; and • Is clear, concise, understandable, and easy to use. This Paper As the first step, City staff and the consultant team have been evaluating the current Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances to identify issues that need to be addressed and changes that should be considered as part of the update. This paper summarizes the principal findings and conclusions of the consultant team’s work and recommends a number of ways that the current ordinances could be improved. It is intended to distill key choices and present “big ideas” for the update, which will be further developed and refined as that effort progresses. The assessment undertaken by the consultant team addressed both the zoning and the subdivision ordinances. However, the dividing and merging of land within the City is largely controlled by the State Subdivision Map Act and the principal assessment finding regarding the City’s subdivision regulations is to update the ordinance for clarity and consistency with State law. As such, much of the discussion in this paper relates to recommendations for Zoning Ordinance provisions, for which the City has broader discretion. Page 681 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 3 The paper is organized by seven topical areas: • Usability; • Zones; • Development Standards; • Use Regulation; • Parking Requirements; • Development Review and Approval; and • Compliance with State and Federal Law Included as an appendix is a summary of comments received during interviews with ordinance users. Next Steps This paper will be the basis for a study session with the Planning Commission. Comments from the study session and further work with City staff will guide preparation of an Annotated Outline representing a recommended approach to the overall organizational structure of the updated Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and a work plan for conducting the update. Page 682 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 4 2 WHAT IS ZONING? While the General Plan and, in the Coastal Zone, the Local Coastal Plan, sets forth a wide-ranging and long-term vision for the City, zoning and subdivision regulations specify how each individual property can be used to achieve those objectives. Zoning is the body of rules and regulations that control what is built on the ground, as well as what uses occupy buildings and sites. Zoning determines the form and character of development, such as the size and height of buildings, and also includes provisions to ensure that new development and uses will fit into existing neighborhoods by establishing the rules for being a “good neighbor.” Zoning regulations deal with two basic concerns: • How to minimize the adverse effects that buildings or using one property can have on its neighbors; and • How to encourage optimal development patterns and activities within a community, as expressed in planning policies. What Zoning Can Do Zoning is used to implement the community goals expressed in a general plan and other land use plan documents. Zoning can do the following: • Use Regulations. Zoning specifies what uses are permitted or conditionally permitted, what uses are required to meet specified standards or limitations, and what uses are prohibited. In this way, the zoning determines the appropriate mix of compatible uses, as well as how intense these uses can be. • Development and Design Standards. Zoning reflects the desired physical character of the community in a set of development and design standards that control the height and bulk of buildings, streetfront and architectural character, location of parking and driveways, “buffering” of uses, and open space needs. • Performance Standards. Zoning often includes standards that control the “performance” of uses to ensure land use compatibility between new and existing neighborhoods or uses. Performance standards address items such as noise, dust, vibration, and stormwater runoff. • Predictability. The use regulations and development standards established in zoning provide neighbors with assurance of what land uses are permitted and to what scale they may be developed. Property owners benefit from knowing exactly what can be done. City staff benefits too, since the need for case-by-case discretionary review of development applications is reduced. Page 683 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 5 What Zoning Cannot Do There are things that zoning cannot do, since zoning is limited in some respects by State law and legal precedent. However, issues not addressed in zoning are usually addressed by other planning tools, such as specific plans and design guidelines. Zoning will not do the following: • Dictate Architectural Design. Although zoning can improve the overall physical character of the community, it can only do so with respect to the building envelope— the height, bulk, and basic elements of structures and their orientation and location on the site. The architectural style or detailed design elements of a building, such as colors and finish materials, are addressed in design guidelines. • Regulate Free Market. Zoning cannot create a market for new development. For example, it cannot determine the exact mix of tenants in a private development. It can, however, create opportunities in the real estate market by removing barriers and offering incentives for desirable uses. • Establish Land Use Policy. Zoning is a tool for implementing land use policy, not setting it. As such, zoning is not the appropriate means for planning analysis or detailed study. Zoning takes direction from the General Plan/Local Coastal Plan and other established land use plans. The Basic Dilemma: Flexibility vs. Certainty As Hermosa Beach considers how best to improve its zoning and subdivision regulations, one issue will be how to find the right balance between flexibility and certainty that will best implement PLAN Hermosa. The dichotomy between these concepts creates tension, not only for City officials and staff who use the regulations on a day-to-day basis, but also for homeowners, business owners, and others who may only come into contact with zoning a few times over the years they may live or operate a business in the City. Everyone wants to know what are the rules and standards by which new development will be judged – how are decisions made to approve, conditionally approve, or reject applications? And, for many, knowing the timeframe as well as the criteria for approval also is important – who has appeal rights, and when is a decision final so a project can proceed. For others, flexibility is important: the site or existing building may be unique, the design innovative and responsive, or the public benefits so compelling that some relief from underlying requirements and generic architectural details may be appropriate. Perspectives of code users help inform the discussion about this issue. Users’ Perspectives Expectations about what zoning should or should not do, and how far it should go, are different, depending on individual perspectives. Applicants view zoning differently than design professionals, Page 684 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 6 and City staff perspectives are not always the same as those of residents or City officials. At the risk of over-simplification, we offer the following set of expectations for different ordinance users as a starting point for thinking about regulatory options for an update of the zoning and subdivision regulations. Applicants Individuals applying to the City for a zoning approval through a permit or land use review generally want to know: • What are the rules that the City follows for development review? These include use regulations, design guidelines and standards, development standards, review procedures, and criteria for decision-making. • What is the timeframe for decision-making, and when is a decision final? Is it the day the approval is granted, or is there some stated time they have to wait before they know they can proceed with the next steps, refine an architectural design, solicit bids, and initiate construction? Users also need to know how much time they have to obtain a building permit or business license. • What relief can they request if a regulation or standard constrains a design solution or otherwise limits what they would like to do with their property or their building? In thinking about relief, it often is useful to distinguish concerns about what the allowable uses are (recognizing that use variances are illegal and the only way to accommodate different uses would be through a zoning code or map amendment) from concerns about how to accommodate a design or improvement on a lot. Relief may be needed from physical development standards (e.g. setbacks or fence height limitations) or from performance requirements that relate primarily to the impact of a use or building design on an adjacent lot. • How important are neighbor concerns in the decision-making process? If an applicant follows the rules, does the City have the right to require changes to a design solely because of a neighbor’s objections? Are there limitations on conditions of approval or are all elements of a project “negotiable”? Does the City distinguish “as-of-right” development applications from those requesting exceptions to the standards in weighing how far to go to respond to community concerns? Design Professionals Architects and other design professionals typically want to know the answer to the same questions applicants pose, but because of their specific role in a project, they often want to know more specifically how much flexibility the ordinance allows for site planning and architectural design. If the City wants to mandate certain design solutions, as opposed to “encouraging” a type of design, the ordinance should say so to avoid misunderstandings during the development review process. Page 685 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 7 An example of a mandated design solution is a requirement for windows or display spaces and a prohibition of blank walls on retail frontages. In this context, design professionals also want to know whether the mandate is a guideline or a development regulation. If it’s a regulation and the proposed building design doesn’t benefit from adding windows, it will be necessary to request a specific form of administrative relief, which could be a variance or a design modification, in order to deviate from the dimensional requirements. By contrast, if the mandate is a design guideline, it may be possible to propose an alternative design solution that meets the guideline’s objective without applying for a variance or use permit to waive design standards if the ordinance provides for alternative ways to comply with a guideline. The flexibility that a design professional typically seeks includes: • Relief from overly prescriptive standards, including setbacks, building height, bulk and articulation, landscaping, location of parking, and architectural design standards (e.g. colors, finishes, porch dimensions, roof pitches, etc.); • Relief from provisions that constrain energy efficiency and water conservation; • Relief for buildings with historic or architectural character; and • Relief for uses or activities with unique needs (e.g. artist studios, churches, personal improvement uses). City Staff and Officials City staff and officials also want flexibility for a number of reasons: • To respond to community concerns; • To implement the General Plan, Local Coastal Plan, and other City plans and initiatives, and to further public policies; • To reconcile competing priorities; • To protect unique and special resources, which may range from coastal resources to historic buildings, affordable housing, and special retail uses; and • To respond to new or emerging technologies, services, or activities. Residents and Business Owners While planners and City officials strive to respond to community concerns, residents and business owners don’t always have the same perspective on zoning, particularly if they feel their interests are not served. Many critical issues are decided when a General Plan/Local Coastal Plan is prepared; however, as implementation details are worked out, community thinking about General Plan/Local Coastal Plan direction may evolve, and there may not be consensus on all of the regulatory solutions proposed to implement the plan. Page 686 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 8 Neighbors want to know with some certainty what can be built, so there are no surprises once construction begins. However, if they have concerns, they would like to know what the process is for community input – how much flexibility the City has to condition approval and what they can do to affect the final result. Business owners likewise want to know whether they can expand or adapt space to new uses or activities. Being able to respond quickly to changing markets is important, and lengthy review times are counterproductive to that objective. Tradeoffs As the City considers the next steps for regulatory reform, discussion of choices could address these basic philosophical issues: • Flexibility vs. predictability: Are the zoning and subdivision regulations intended as a rule of law or a rule of individuals? Should the area for negotiation be wide or narrow? To what extent should this be determined by the code or by practice? • Flexibility vs. administrative cost: What are the costs to the applicant, to opponents, and to the City’s tolerance for hearings? • Development cost vs. quality: Standards should be written with an understanding of their effect on developers' and consumers' costs and on the quality of the environment for both user and community at large. • Preservation vs. development: Will a particular regulation stimulate or dampen change in uses, users, or appearance? A related issue is whether adopting a new standard will result in a proliferation of nonconforming conditions, which could also discourage investment. • Under regulation vs. over-regulation: How does the community strike the right balance and find the least number of rules that will do the job? Striking the right balance will not be easy, and lessons from similar communities that have recently amended their zoning and subdivision regulations can enable the City to avoid mistakes others have made and achieve its goals for economic development and sustainable land use. Page 687 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 9 3 USABILITY The need to make Hermosa Beach’s Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances more user-friendly and concise was an important issue expressed by staff and observed by the consultant team. Ordinance users find that the text of the Ordinance is complex and that interpretations may differ among staff. The document is difficult to navigate and should rely more extensively on pointers and references to direct users to appropriate regulations. A well-organized code is easy to use, navigate, and understand. This section contains general observations about the existing organization, format, and usability, as well as strategies for improving these aspects of the existing Ordinance. Organization and Style The City’s current Zoning Ordinance, Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, is organized in a manner that exhibits an underlying structure that generally follows a flow from introductory provisions, to zone standards, citywide standards, and finally administrative procedures. While the underlying structure can be recognized by those with ample ordinance-using experience, this structure is not intuitive or obvious to the average user. The Ordinance lacks a user-friendly structure with clear hierarchy and chapter numbering is not consecutive. Some chapters appear to follow a pattern of every second number (ex. 17.02, 17.04, 17.06) while others don’t (ex. 17.50, 17.53, 17.54, 17.55). The chapters that follow a pattern of every second number appear to be original, while chapters that don’t follow this pattern appear to be later amendments. Over the years, as sections and chapters have been updated or added, there hasn’t been a comprehensive reformat of the Ordinance, resulting in a disorganized format as well as inconsistent organization of each individual section. The organization of Hermosa Beach’s Zoning Ordinance can be improved in several ways, with the overall organization and formatting reflecting a systematic, consistent, and sound arrangement to facilitate understanding. First, the City should consider a new level in the organizational hierarchy—Part—to organize the 39 chapters into logical groups intended to make the zoning ordinance easier to navigate. For example, the chapters contained in Title 17 could be grouped into five parts to provide an additional level of organization. • Part I: Introductory Provisions • Part II: Zone Regulations • Part III: Citywide Standards • Part IV: Administration • Part V: Terms and Definitions Page 688 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 10 With this organization, the ordinance progresses from the most often referenced to the least—with basic provisions in the beginning, followed by regulations of specific zones, citywide standards, and then administrative chapters. As a general rule, the most frequently consulted provisions should come before provisions less frequently consulted. A final part or division can group all definitions and standards of measurement together, so that users have access to a comprehensive reference section in an easily located place. Next, the Ordinance could be enhanced with a comprehensive index and table of contents so that users do not have to scour the text for a section when needed. Finally, the City should supplement these organizational revisions with improvements to the appearance of the text itself, including wider spacing, different fonts for chapters, sections, and the main text, and consistent indentation. Page 689 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 11 Code Complexity The organization of the current Ordinance leaves standards of development spread out among various sections. Because standards are dispersed, users are left with a nagging fear that a “hidden” regulation might affect the viability of a project. Uncertainty regarding development possibilities can be a significant barrier when attempting to attract investment. Also some development standards result from or have been derived from ballot measures, which is not always clearly articulated. Overall, the chapter ordering of the Ordinance is not always intuitive, and sections that should be grouped together are often found far apart or separated by other chapters. Accessory Dwelling Unit standards, which are applicable in multiple zones are located in their own chapter in the midst of chapters of zone standards. Mixed-use development standards and educational institution standards, which are only applicable in the C-1 and C-3 zone, respectively, are located in a chapter with development standards applicable to uses in multiple zones, Chapter 17.40, Conditional Use Permit and Other Permit Standards. Additional standards for specific uses, are located in a third chapter, Chapter 17.42, General Provisions, Conditions, and Exceptional Uses. Hermosa Beach should ensure that the Zoning Ordinance functions efficiently and with the fewest number of provisions necessary to achieve its goals. To this end, related content should be organized together and unnecessary sections of the Ordinance should be removed in order to avoid ambiguity and reduce the sheer bulk of the Ordinance. Lack of Clear Definitions and Rules of Measurement Though the current Zoning Ordinance includes three sections of definitions, some terms that should be defined, are not, some definitions are overly specific, and others include development standards. The definition of ‘grade’ includes a statement that the determination of grade is to be made by the Community Development Director. The definition of ‘open space’ identifies acceptable encroachments. Definitions should convey the meaning of a term; standards should be located in the body of the regulations. The definitions should be updated to include modern terminology and be made more general so that they will apply to terms as they are used throughout the Zoning Ordinance and other City codes. Where possible, definitions should also align with those of other applicable rules and regulations such as the Building Code, State Alcoholic Beverage Control regulations, and State housing laws. The Zoning Ordinance does not include a separate chapter on rules of measurement; rules for the calculation of standards are located throughout the ordinance. In some cases, such as lot coverage, and determining the baseline points for measuring building height, they are incorporated into general definitions. Others are located among regulations for specific development aspects. The calculation of floor area is located within the definition of ‘gross floor area’ in the definitions section of the off-street parking regulations. Clear rules of measurement ensure that all users are able to determine the way that standards should be applied in the same Page 690 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 12 Tables with cross references enhance usability. manner in order to arrive at the same conclusion. Locating a complete set of rules of measurement in one location, either at the beginning or the end of the Ordinance, provide an easy-to-locate reference tool to ensure consistent interpretation and application of standards. Underutilized Tables The existing Ordinance does utilize tables to present certain regulatory requirements, although inconsistently and sparingly. The C-1, C-2, C-3, and M-1 zones and Specific Plan Area No. 11 use tables to present use regulations while all other zones and plan areas list use allowance or cross-reference other zones for use allowances. Tables can greatly improve the readability of complex regulations and could be used more extensively to organize and more clearly present information throughout the Ordinance. Use regulation tables can specify the level of review required, list any limitations on permitted uses, and provide cross-references to other sections of the Ordinance where additional regulations apply. Development standard tables can list dimensional requirements for lots, setbacks, heights, and other standards with cross-references to other applicable sections of the Ordinance. This approach helps avoid unnecessary redundancy, repetition of provisions, and confusion from conflicts. Page 691 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 13 Illustrations of standards, such as these in the City’s Height Requirements & Calculating Height handout, aid in interpretation. Absence of Illustrations In addition, the current Zoning Ordinance provides few graphic examples or illustrations. Graphics can clearly depict standards for measuring building height or yard setbacks, while verbal equivalents are prone to misinterpretation and uncertainty. Clarifying visual examples of measurement standards, development standards, and other complex provisions, similar to those included on the City’s Height Requirements & Calculating Height handout, help with understanding and enforcement. Incorporating illustrations such as these into the Zoning Ordinance can communicate development regulations more clearly and in less space than written standards. Page 692 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 14 4 ZONES Zoning districts, or zones, create the framework for implementation of General Plan policies and land use designations. The General Plan establishes land use designations and the overall policy basis for land use and development. Zoning then establishes zones which are intended to define distinct locations for different uses, consistent with general plan land use designations. The Zoning Ordinance includes standards for each of these zones with detailed regulations as to what uses are permitted, what uses are allowed, and what physical development standards apply. Zones to Implement PLAN Hermosa PLAN Hermosa builds upon the city’s historic development pattern to accommodate anticipated population and employment growth. The Land Use Designations Map in PLAN Hermosa indicates the intended use of each parcel of land in the City. The land use designations were developed to provide both a vision of the organization of uses in the City and a flexible structure to allow for changes in economic conditions and community vision. There are four categories of land use designations: Residential, Commercial, Creative Industrial, and Institutional. The majority of individual designations within these four categories are consistent with or similar to previous designations or existing development types. Others are new, including Public Facilities and Beach land use designations. In these situations, new zones on the Zoning Map and in the Zoning Ordinance are warranted. Page 693 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 15 Streamline Existing Zones There may also be opportunity for streamlining existing zones and eliminating those that are no longer necessary. For example, the only differences between the R-3, Multiple-family Residential, Zone and the R-P, Residential Professional, Zone are variations in lot coverage allowances, height considerations, and that the R-P Zone allows office as a conditionally permitted use. The R-P Zone is within the High Density Residential Land Use Designation in PLAN Hermosa and its existing development consists solely of residential uses. In the interest of creating a concise and user- friendly zoning ordinance, the total number of zones should be minimized and zones that are not necessary, such as the R-P Zone, should be removed or consolidated. Additionally, the Zoning Ordinance also includes 10 Specific Plan Areas. The regulations for these Specific Plan Areas vary in content and detail, ranging from refinements to the residential housing types allowed and minimum lot area per dwelling for an individual residential development to detailed use regulations and development standards for a large portion of Pier Avenue. Each of the Specific Plan Areas should be reviewed for relevance and their potential to integrate necessary standards into zone regulations. In some cases, relevant Specific Plan Areas standards may be integrated entirely into other base zones. In other cases, a unique zone may be warranted. Zone Presentation and Organization The Zoning Ordinance will benefit from combining similar zones, where appropriate, and by renaming zones to reflect the General Plan land use designation and provide information regarding the purpose and nature of the zone. Zones can then be consolidated into related groups, such as Residential, Commercial and Mixed-Use, Industrial, and Public and Semi-Public districts, similar to how the C-1, C-2, and C-3 zones are consolidated into one chapter in the existing Zoning Ordinance. When zones are consolidated, the differences among individual zones are identified through purpose statements and reflected in the use regulations and development standards, which will vary based on the unique characteristics and purposes of the zone. Page 694 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 16 5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The importance of quality design in community spaces and residential neighborhoods cannot be overemphasized. A well-designed city directly elevates the quality of life, which in turn, attracts investment and increases communal pride. As Hermosa Beach redevelops over time, the City will continue to face design challenges. The current Zoning Ordinance does not have sufficient standards to appropriately guide and regulate development especially in building appearance and design compatibility. Development regulations that address the building form and site design of new development can respond to differences in character, promote a desirable physical form, and ensure that more intense uses of land do not become public nuisances. The Zoning Ordinance does not address the physical form of development in an organized or complete fashion. The current Zoning Ordinance was first written at a time when Ordinances focused on regulating use rather than design. More recently, design-oriented approaches are replacing traditional, use-based zoning as a means of addressing the physical character of development. Hermosa Beach has followed this trend over the years, as development standards and requirements have been added. In some instances, they have been added with little analysis of how all the standards work together and collectively influence resulting development. In other instances, such as Specific Plan Area No. 11, detailed development standards that address many aspects of site development and building design have been adopted. PLAN Hermosa provides a foundation for implementing zoning techniques designed to improve the physical form of new development. It recognizes that distinct neighborhoods, districts, and corridors contribute positively to the overall structure and character of the City. Fourteen character areas are identified, defined by their future vision, intended distribution of land use, and desired form and character. PLAN Hermosa also includes a number of policies related to design, including, but not limited to: 1.6: Scale and context. Consider the compatibility of new development within its urban context to avoid abrupt changes in scale and massing. 2.7: Context sensitive design. Wherever feasible, orient residential buildings to address streets, public spaces or shared private spaces, and consider the physical characteristics of its site, surrounding land uses, and available public infrastructure. 2.8: Neighborhood transitions. Encourage that new development provide appropriate transitions in scale, building type and density between different land use designations. Page 695 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 17 3.5: Compact office formats. New employment uses should be designed in a compact format with minimal front setbacks from the street, typical lease spans of 40 feet or less, and where feasible, combined with other commercial uses. 6.6: Human-scale buildings. Encourage buildings and design to include human-scale details such as windows on the street, awnings and architectural features that create a visually interesting pedestrian environment. Physical Form and Design Related Standards In order to implement PLAN Hermosa policies, the City will need to adopt new development regulations to address the form and design of new development, such as standards for the following: • Location of a building on a lot – where a building may or must be built to the street and where setbacks are required; • Building form and massing; • Façade design and articulation; • Orientation of building entries; • Transparency – pedestrian level windows offering views into buildings and displays; • Limitations on blank walls; • Relation to adjoining sites; • Location and screening of parking; and • Landscaping. Establishing minimum design standards will set the tone for the type of development the City hopes to attract. These standards will allow developers and designers to know exactly what is Form-related standards can help achieve high quality design. Page 696 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 18 expected of them. At the same time, flexibility can still be achieved by allowing a modification of standards so long as certain findings and criteria are met. Flexibility is particularly important given the varied lot sizes and topography that characterize City. Tailor Standards to Reflect Character Areas It would be difficult for the City to prepare a single, comprehensive set of design requirements as neighborhoods, districts, and corridors within Hermosa Beach have distinct characters that required tailored regulations so that new development is appropriate to the context of the area. Standards should be refined to foster the type of character desired within various areas of the City. In pedestrian-oriented areas, the objective should be to have buildings enclose a street and provide an interesting, engaging front, making walking and shopping pleasurable. In more auto-oriented areas there is more potential for incompatibility between uses, so landscaping and screening may be important. Development standards should also address compatibility and ensuring that new buildings fit amongst existing buildings. The ordinance should detail how to address contextual issues of building placement, scale, massing, and height and include standards to ensure sensitive transition from more intense development to surrounding neighborhoods. While each zone or area should have individually tailored requirements, the organization of the requirements should be uniform, so that users can easily ascertain the requirements for a particular zone. Objective Design Standards The State of California has adopted recent legislation to address the State-wide housing shortage and now requires a streamlined and ministerial process for specific residential developments, including multi-unit residential development and mixed-use development with 2/3 of the square footage for residential use. These types of projects must be reviewed against existing objective standards rather than through a discretionary entitlement process. Objective Standard (per State law): One that involves no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant and the public official prior to submittal. Page 697 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 19 An update to the Zoning Ordinance provides an opportunity to establish objective standards to achieve quality designed housing projects without subjective interpretation or a complex review and approval process, consistent with State law requirements. Residential Development The Zoning Ordinance currently establishes standards for multi-family development primarily in Chapter 17.16 – R-3 Multiple-Family Residential Zone and Chapter 17.24 - RPD Residential Planned Development. Basic standards include height, front yard, side yards, placement of buildings, area, lot coverage, usable open space, and lot area per dwelling. Projects typically require discretionary review by the Planning Commission where more qualitative conditions are applied to ensure compatibility with neighborhood context and to elevate design quality. The Zoning Ordinance update provides the opportunity to refine existing quantitative standards and develop new objective standards that capture the qualitative conditions typically applied to multi-family residential projects through the discretionary process. Objective standards should be developed to ensure that development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods, that quality materials are used, and that building form and scale is appropriate to the site. Such standards may address the following: • Setbacks; • Building heights; • Floor area ratio (FAR) or lot coverage; • Usable open space • Relation to neighboring buildings (stepbacks and articulation versus “compatibility in scale”); • Explaining in details the characteristics of a particular architectural style and list the required components; • Limits on blank wall (breaks in blank walls every X feet); • Building frontage requirements (number of doors, space between doors and garage, etc.); • Material requirements; • Color requirements; and • Consistency with neighborhood character (if defined in an objective manner). To support consistent application of objective standards, it is recommended that images and exhibits representing a suggested design topic or standard with text callouts be developed in the new Ordinance, where applicable, to illustrate the design intent. Page 698 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 20 Mixed-Use Development Chapter 17.40.180 – Mixed-use Development (C-1 Zone) of the current Ordinance provides the opportunity to establish mixed-use development subject to approval of a conditional use permit, a discretionary permit process, within the C-1 Limited Business and Residential zone. The residential portion of a mixed-use development is subject to the development standards of the R-3 Multiple Family Residential Zone with a few tailored exceptions relating to condominiums, percentage limitation of first floor residential use, front setbacks, lot coverage and trees. General development guidance is provided for noise, security, and lighting. In addition, parking requirements are provided in Section 17.44.010 Off Street Parking – Mixed Use where required parking is determined using on the sum requirements of all individual uses. While State law requirements for objective standards and a streamlined review process apply to mixed-use development with 2/3 of the square footage for residential use, mixed-use development may be comprised of a number of different use combinations. By providing a variety of uses within close proximity, mixed-use development can reduce automobile dependence, preserve green space and natural resources, promote revitalization, enhance economic development. Mixed-use developments can also provide for a wide range of housing types and choices for different income levels and may increase affordable housing opportunities. Development standards tailored to the unique attributes of mixed-use development can provide greater assurance of compatibility with neighborhoods and better alignment with market considerations. While the objective standards and a streamlined review process is required for certain mixed-use developments, the City should consider establishing objective standards and streamlined review for other types of mixed-use developments in order to promote their establishment while ensuring appropriate design and siting. Mixed-use development standards should address compatibility issues while providing flexibility for combining residential and commercial components with active, pedestrian-oriented ground floor uses, where consistent with PLAN Hermosa. In addition to the physical form and design related standards discussed previously in this paper, customized mixed- use regulations should consider the following: • Location of desired land uses; • Public and private access; • Building placement and orientation; • Residential private open space; • Common open space; • Noise, light, and odor control; and • Location and screening of parking, loading, and service areas. Page 699 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 21 Provide Flexibility In many instances, particularly in areas like Hermosa Beach with small lots with existing development, the need for flexibility in the application of development standards is not a reflection of the quality of the project or design, rather a reflection of site constraints that limit the effectiveness of a ‘one size fits all’ approach. The existing Zoning Ordinance provides for little flexibility in the application of development standards. The two primary avenues available for modification of development standards in the current Zoning Ordinance are variances and administrative variances. Specific findings related to unique characteristics of a property are required to approve variances and administrative variances are limited in scope and the legality of administrative variances is unclear. As the City incorporates additional development regulations into the Zoning Ordinance, the City should create additional opportunities for gaining relief from codified locational, developmental, and operational standards in cases where modifications are warranted by special circumstances that may not meet the requirements for approval of a variance based on physical hardship. This could be done in the form of additional provisions for approval of waivers and exceptions, including Staff level approval of a so-called de minimus waiver from dimensional standards. Options include a minor modification that allows for specified dimensional modifications (e.g. less than a 10 percent reduction in setbacks and fence heights) that would have a negligible impact and are non-controversial in nature. Some jurisdictions provide one level of adjustment without notice and a slightly higher level of adjustment with notice and the opportunity for neighbors to request a public hearing. Page 700 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 22 6 USE REGULATIONS Use regulations detail the type of uses that are allowed, the review process, and specific limitations that apply to a particular activity or use. Use regulations have traditionally been used to separate incompatible land uses, minimize nuisances, and limit adverse effects on neighboring properties. Each zone currently contains a list of permitted uses and some list conditionally permitted uses. Residential zones allow any use permitted in less intense residential zones (ex. The R-3 Zone allows any use permitted in the R-2 Zone). Some zones, including the C-1, C-2, C-3, and M-1 zones and SPA-11, present use regulations in tables with cross references to use specific standards. There are outdated and overly specific uses, such as ‘detective agency’, ‘messenger service’ and ‘computer and Internet access center’. Other times, uses with little distinction between them are regulated separately. ‘Toy store’, ‘clothing and wearing apparel sales and service’, ‘department store’, drugstore’, ‘florist or plant shop’, and ‘hobby and craft sales and services’ are all examples of similar retail services, and that may even occur within a single retail establishment, that are separately regulated. The Ordinance lacks a comprehensive list of defined uses that are regulated by the Ordinance. Commercial land uses are grouped into a single section of the Zoning Ordinance while residential uses are mixed in with definitions of general terms in a separate section. Some uses are not defined. During the course of stakeholder interviews, attracting and retaining retail and restaurant uses in the Downtown was identified as one of the greatest challenges facing the City today. Over the years, the City has added strict and inflexible standards to the Ordinance and conditions of approval to individual projects that limit operations of commercial uses, particularly establishments that serve alcohol and provide live or late night entertainment. While these standards and limitations were intended to maintain and improve community livability, and reduce nuisance activity, particularly in areas with commercial and residential adjacencies, they have also stifled potential economic investment in the Downtown and along the corridors. The Zoning Ordinance update effort provides the opportunity to update the City’s approach to use regulation to reflect modern uses, current development practices, and State and Attracting and retaining retail and restaurant uses in the Downtown is a challenge. Page 701 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 23 federal law and support community objectives such as economic development, increased walkability, diversity of housing types, and vibrant urban centers. Through well-crafted regulations, the Zoning Ordinance can maximize the City’s economic development “pluses” and support economic investment, while ensuring it does not create undue impacts on its neighbors. Adopt a Use Classification System The Zoning Ordinance should ensure that every use regulated by the ordinance is defined through a clearly defined modern classification system, which places land uses and activities into groups based on common functional, product, or physical characteristics. There are many advantages to this type of use classification system. Listing use groups instead of specific uses help streamline the use regulation parts of the Ordinance. Categories are also broad enough to allow classification of new, unanticipated uses, so that the City does not need to amend these sections or make interpretations as frequently. Under this system, all use categories would be defined in a single chapter of the Code. This chapter would organize use categories into groups such as residential; public and semi-public; commercial; industrial; and transportation, communication, and utility uses. This way, similar uses are found near one another for comparison when a classification question arises. The official names of each use group would be utilized throughout the Code in a consistent manner, with the definitions chapter serving as a reference. Reflect Contemporary Land Uses To help modernize the Zoning Ordinance, the use classification system described above should eliminate obsolete uses (i.e., those no longer allowed, or outdated terms) such as game arcade and miniature golf course, and also include new contemporary uses such as industrial flex space and shared office spaces. Ensure All Zones Allow Appropriate Land Uses The allowable uses within each zone should be evaluated for compatibility with the purpose of the zone, the corresponding land use designation in PLAN Hermosa, and reflective of contemporary use and development trends. In particular, use regulations in nonresidential districts should be evaluated to allow a broader range of uses, reflecting the changing nature of land use and allowing a creative combination of uses, consistent with PLAN Hermosa. In particular, M-1 Zone use allowances should be evaluated, balancing the need to protect the accessibility of the area for production, design, and manufacturing uses and allowing non-manufacturing uses that are conducive to and supportive of the viability of creative and innovative endeavors. Page 702 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 24 Standards for Specific Uses Regulations applicable to specific land uses are currently found throughout the Ordinance. An entire chapter, Chapter 17.21, is dedicated to standards for Accessory Dwelling Units. Chapter 17.40, Conditional Use Permit and Other Permit Standards, and 17.42, General Provisions, Conditions and Exceptional Uses, both contain specific standards for multiple uses. The fact that these regulations pertaining to particular uses are scattered throughout the Ordinance makes it hard for users to find them and determine which special regulations apply to a particular project. Some use definitions in the existing Ordinance include limitations, requirements, and allowances related to the use. For example, the definition of “Hotel” includes a statement that the decision- making body has the authority to set any limitation on the number and/or type of kitchenette facilities provided in the guest rooms for projects located on parcels of greater than 20,000 square feet. Although these provisions may be appropriate, embedding them within the use definitions complicates administration and makes it difficult for applicants to determine which development standards apply to a particular proposal. These regulations should be addressed in separate sections of the Ordinance where the limitations are visible and adequately discussed. For example, they may be located in a chapter dedicated to standards for specific uses and referenced in the use regulations for each zoning district. The City should consolidate requirements that are applicable to specific uses and activities into a single chapter. Within this chapter, the uses can be alphabetized, making them easy to locate. The standards for specific uses can be referenced in the land use tables in the zone regulations, which will reduce overall wordiness in the Ordinance. When revising use regulations, the City should be sure to reevaluate and expand its regulation of uses that create potential incompatibilities with surrounding properties. The City should incorporate explicit performance standards to ensure that the operation of one use does not cause an undue burden upon the use and enjoyment of adjacent property and everyone is clear on what the requirements are. Finally, the City should evaluate the limitations in the Ordinance and project approvals on establishments that serve alcohol and provide entertainment in in seeking a better balance of achieving community goals for a vibrant local economy and the revitalization of the downtown core while minimizing adverse impacts. The Ordinance should be evaluated in terms of creating opportunities for new investment to achieve these goals, in consideration of other mechanisms the City may employ to address public nuisances and poor behavior of individual establishments. All of these modifications to the existing use classification system and development standards will work to reduce the need for discretionary review of new development. With clarified requirements and a more comprehensive scheme of use classification, approvals will encounter fewer delays, with heightened assurances of appropriate development and compatibility with adjacent properties. Page 703 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 25 7 PARKING REQUIREMENTS Parking was by far the most frequent issue raised by stakeholders. The topic has been the focus of many community conversations and planning efforts, including, but not limited to PLAN Hermosa and the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy. The City recently completed a Parking Management Study and Recommended Parking Standards for the Coastal Zone which included a parking inventory, occupancy analysis, demand analysis, and recommendations for parking strategies. Parking requirements have a large influence on the ability to utilize property. Because of the high costs of building and maintaining off-street parking, minimum parking requirements can raise barriers to reuse underutilized parcels. This is particularly true in already built-out areas, such as Hermosa Beach, where there may not be enough space to provide required parking. Where additional parking spaces cannot be provided due to site constraints, businesses are deterred from expanding or investing within the City. The quantity, location, and appearance of parking areas also have a substantial impact on the character and functionality of streets, commercial corridors, and residential neighborhoods. Too much parking can limit the utilization of a property and be an impediment to achieving a wide range of community goals. Too little parking can impede accessibility and impact neighborhoods. The amount of parking is optimized when it strikes a right balance between supply and demand. For roughly 50 years, cities across the country, including Hermosa Beach, have included minimum requirements as a means of mitigating the impact of parking demand on public streets. These minimum parking requirements are based on inaccurate assumptions and do not reflect actual parking demand. For example, in Hermosa Beach, many of the minimum parking requirements were derived from the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual and do not reflect local conditions. This approach to parking demand mitigation has created a number of unwanted side effects, including: • Reducing the viability of reuse of existing buildings; • Limiting options for development on smaller lots or awkwardly-shaped sites; • Discouraging alternatives to automobiles (by promoting an overabundance of parking, alternatives like walking, cycling, transit and car-sharing are at a distinct disadvantage); • Eroding pedestrian environments by increasing the proliferation of land devoted to the automobile, creating large swathes of inhospitable surface parking lots; and Page 704 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 26 • Adding to the cost of living, since the cost of providing minimum required parking is passed down to the consumer in the price for goods, services, and housing, creating an unfair burden for those who do not drive. As such, cities are increasingly turning to other mechanisms as ways of addressing parking concerns including increasing alternative transportation options and employing parking management techniques. Additionally, our transportation systems are on the cusp of one of the fastest and most transformative shifts in history. The demand for shared mobility services is an early sign of behavior change. Autonomous vehicles are being used on streets today. These changes will have great consequences for parking demand. Although it is unknown exactly what these consequences will be, it is certain that there are more transportation options available than before and people are no longer dependent on individual vehicles for access and mobility. The future transportation system and our mobility choices will continue to have a lot more flexibility. Mobility choices will not be primarily limited to a personal vehicle or existence of a transit line. Reduce or Eliminate Minimum Parking Requirements All of the parking requirements should be evaluated and reduced where appropriate based on actual and anticipated parking demand and in consideration of the collective of City goals, including economic development, pedestrian orientation, housing affordability, and sustainability; of the recommendations from the Coastal Zone parking study and Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy, of the changing nature of our transportation systems; and of a parking management program. For example, the Downtown Core Revitalization Strategy included a number of recommendations to encourage a more pedestrian-oriented district, including: • Locating parking off-site • Reduced parking for commercial, restaurant, office, and retail uses • Reduced parking for mixed-use development • Vehicle parking reductions for the provision of bicycle parking • Utilizing net usable square footage as the basis for parking calculations, rather than gross square footage In revising parking requirements, the City should consider providing uniform parking requirements for grouped land uses with similar space and operational requirements. The City could still provide Page 705 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 27 separate requirements for land uses with particular space and operational requirements that generate unique parking demands. Standardizing parking requirements so multiple uses have the same requirements can ease administration and provide flexibility with regard to re-use and re- investment. Flexibility could also be offered in the way that parking is designed and located, such as allowances for tandem, valet, and stacked parking (parking lifts), thus providing more opportunity for parking in less space. The City should consider varying or adjusting parking requirements by district as well, considering the availability of street or public parking supplies in a particular district. Exempt Small Commercial Establishments The City should consider providing an exemption from the off-street parking requirements for small commercial establishments, such as those under 1,500 square feet of gross floor area. This exemption could be across the board or limited based on certain characteristics, such as new uses in existing buildings, uses located in pedestrian oriented commercial districts, or uses within a commercial center with shared parking facilities. For many small retail and business uses, available on-street parking in the City’s commercial districts and corridors or shared in a shopping center is adequate for their parking demand. Alleviating small commercial establishments from providing parking may help fill vacant storefronts and incentivize redevelopment. Exempt or Reduce Parking Requirements for Changes of Use It is often infeasible to provide additional on-site parking on an already developed site, thus limiting the types of new uses that may locate in an existing building. To support the continued occupancy of existing buildings, the City could consider not requiring additional parking where a new commercial use is established in an existing building even if the new use is subject to a higher parking requirement than the previous use, provided existing parking is retained and there is no change to the building that results in additional gross floor area. Alternatively, when a new business moves into a building where the existing use had a legal nonconforming parking deficiency, the new use could be credited the number of required parking spaces unmet by the previous use. While this parking credit is available in the Downtown District, the City should consider applying this approach on a broader scale. Parking exemptions can incentivize small commercial establishments. Page 706 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 28 8 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL Zoning provisions governing development review and other administrative matters create the procedural environment through which the City can achieve the goals and policies laid out in its General Plan and other adopted policies. At their best, development review provisions can promote the type of development a community wants by providing a clear, predictable path to project approval; conversely, vague review processes with unclear requirements can cause developers a high level of anxiety, frustrate community residents, and severely dampen a City’s ability to attract desirable growth. Generally, prospective investors value three central qualities in any administrative code: 1) certainty in the requirements and structure of the review process, 2) built-in flexibility to adjust development standards to the needs of individual projects, and 3) opportunities to request relief from requirements that constitute a substantial burden. Certainty about the types of development they can expect to see in their community is also important to residents. The degree to which Hermosa Beach can incorporate these qualities into its Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances will help improve its ability to compete for desirable development. This section contains general observations about the existing development review procedures and strategies to streamline development review and approval process. Reliance on Discretionary Review The flexibility of a zoning ordinance is largely defined by its hierarchy of uses and their required permits. This hierarchy establishes the different levels of review the ordinance requires to make various types of decisions. These decisions typically range from a relatively informal counter staff review of proposed uses and structures for compliance prior to the issuance of a building permit or business license to more formal and complex procedures requiring public notice and a hearing before the Planning Commission prior to issuance of a use permit or other discretionary approval. The primary factor influencing a project’s place in the hierarchy of uses is whether the proposed use is permitted "by right" or allowed subject to certain conditions, or whether a Conditional Use Permit or other permit type with review by the Planning Commission, is required. This determination is a reflection of community issues and concerns that should be embodied in the General Plan. Decisions about where an application fits in the hierarchy may also, however, be influenced by how a jurisdiction selects and designs administrative techniques. It is often possible, for example, to reduce the review threshold for a particular type of application (i.e. place it lower in the hierarchy), by increasing the specificity of development standards and performance-based criteria. Page 707 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 29 Adjust Review Thresholds The Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Update provides an opportunity to adjust review thresholds based on analysis of the types of issues and projects in the City that have typically generated the most interest and concern. For example, projects that currently require Planning Commission approval but are consistently approved without public comment, such as small condominium projects, might be shifted to the jurisdiction of the Community Development Department Director. Generally speaking, responsibilities should be assigned with a view toward minimizing the number of players involved in making any given decision, while increasing opportunities for meaningful public input. The number of uses that require discretionary review can be reduced by including carefully crafted standards and restrictions that are specific to specific uses throughout the City or in particular zones into the Zoning Ordinance. As a result, the community and decision-makers may be confident their vision is being implemented and may reduce the need to weigh in on individual projects, allowing more projects to be approved administratively. There are a variety of approaches the City could use to reduce the number of uses requiring review, including permitting more uses by right subject to: • Compliance with development and design standards that could be added to the Zoning Ordinance based on the General Plan’s goals for design quality; • Compliance with new standards and requirements that reflect “standard conditions” that are typically imposed when such uses have been conditionally approved; and • Compliance with specific limitations on location, floor area, hours of operation, and similar features that are the source of potential adverse impact. Consider a Minor Use Permit Process The City may also consider a new type of use permit – a Minor Use Permit – approved by the Community Development Director. The Minor Use Permit would be required for uses that are “limited in scope and impacts” but which currently require a hearing by the Planning Commission, or could be used for minor amendments to Use Permits. Applications for Minor Use Permits would be subject to public notice and a hearing before the Director would only be held if someone requested one. All decisions would be subject to appeal. The Director would also have the authority to defer action and refer the application to the Planning Commission for final action. Notice of decision or notice of pending decision could be given to Planning Commissioners with an option for the Planning Commission to call for review of a project. Such a procedure creates more certainty in the process for both the community and developers while still providing opportunities for meaningful public input. Conditional Use Permits would be reserved for uses that pose potential or significant land use compatibility issues and warrant Planning Commission review and approval. Page 708 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 30 Ordinance-users expressed that it wasn’t always clear what the review process or who the review authority was for a given decision. Unclear Review and Approval Procedures Ordinance-users expressed that it wasn’t always clear what the review process or who the review authority was for a given decision. Chapter 17.68, Procedure, Hearings, Notices and Fees, of the current Zoning Ordinance contains some common permit procedures. Other chapters contain permit-specific provisions for reports of decision and findings, effective dates, appeals, reapplication, revocation, and expiration. In many cases it is unclear how these procedures differ from permit to permit, especially when many other aspects of the permit procedures, including review body, are the same. For example, both parking plans and conditional use permits are subject to Planning Commission approval. The Zoning Ordinance is clear in stating that a decision by the Planning Commission of a conditional use permit may be appealed to the City Council. However, for parking plans, the Zoning Ordinance states that processing procedures are to be set by resolution of the City Council and is silent on appeal procedures, leaving many questions. Is a parking plan appealable? If a parking plan is submitted along with a Conditional Use Permit and the Conditional Use Permit is appealed, is the parking plan up for consideration as part of the appeal? Clearly distinguishing the issuing authority and applicable review process helps clarify the level of review required for a project. Additionally, procedural nuances between different types of approvals, often with the same review authority, is confusing. The creation of a simplified permit structure that establishes a limited number of procedural tracks for approvals would provide greater clarity for all users and simplify administration. Page 709 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 31 Clarify Administrative Procedures for All Decisions The updated Zoning Ordinance should set forth clear administrative procedures to be followed for all types of decisions. The level and extent of administrative process required for different types of decisions will vary. However, for even the simplest administrative procedures, the Ordinance should, at a minimum, establish unambiguous authority for approval and the process for appeal. The approval process can be streamlined simply by consolidating and clarifying procedures and permit approval criteria. Decision-making protocols should be clearly defined so that it is clear how approvals are processed, and the intent of these regulations should be included to help determine if a proposal meets the purpose of the regulation. Findings that the decision-making body is required to make in order to approve a project should be clear so that all interested parties know the criteria against which a project is evaluated. Expanding the set of common permit procedures would improve usability by helping applicants to understand the general review process more easily. Where necessary, unique procedures could be developed for specific permit types, but generally, permits with the same review body should follow the same procedures. Elements of a standard set of common administrative procedures include the following: • A clear and consistent authority for determining whether an application is complete; • Clear and consistent procedures for appeals; • Requirements for public notification; and • Permit effective dates and time extension procedures. Page 710 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 32 9 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAW California law grants cities and counties relatively broad discretion in the regulation of land uses and development, and the Federal courts and United States Congress have, for the most part, left land use and environmental regulation up to state and local government. There are, however, some important exceptions to this approach. If local regulations conflict with federal law, pursuant to the supremacy clause of the United State Constitution, then local laws are preempted. In some cases, both Congress and the State have identified matters of critical concern that limit the authority of California cities. This section discusses some State and Federal laws to consider through the update of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. Housing As California's housing supply and homelessness crisis continues, the State Legislature has passed numerous pieces of housing legislation in each legislative session of the past several years. Most recent legislation is aimed at streamlining approval of housing projects and reducing barriers to the creation of housing. The City has been actively working to comply with the legislation through a number of mechanisms. Highlights of housing related legislation most relevant to the Zoning Ordinance are briefly summarized below. Housing Developments SB330, the Housing Crisis Act, limits cities’ and counties’ ability to regulate housing developments, including residential development, mixed use development with 2/3 of the square footage for residential, and transitional and supportive housing. It creates a preliminary application process where existing objective development standards are those in effect when a preliminary application is submitted, establishes timeframes for when a historic determination and project approval must be made, and limits the number of hearings. A number of provisions address housing density. General Plan and zoning densities may not be reduced below 2018 numbers. This includes changes to development standards that lessen intensity of housing. Zoning may not be changed to remove housing, and there may be no onsite reduction in the number of units. Page 711 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 33 The Housing Crisis Act also prohibits local jurisdictions from imposing or enforcing new subjective design standards. Establishing objective development standards for housing developments are discussed in more detail in section 5 of this paper. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) New laws further restrict what local agencies may regulate regarding ADUs. Local agencies may not adopt ADU ordinances that: impose minimum lot size requirements for ADUs; set certain maximum ADU dimensions; require replacement off-street parking when a "garage, carport or covered parking structure" is demolished or converted to construct the ADU. New laws allow for an ADU as well as a "junior" ADU where certain access, setback and other criteria are met and explicitly identifies opportunities for ADUs in multifamily buildings. Additionally, until Jan. 1, 2025, cities may not condition approval of ADU building permit applications on the applicant being the "owner-applicant" of either the primary dwelling or the ADU. Hermosa Beach adopted its Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance consistent with the new legislation in December 2019. Affordable Housing The State Density Bonus Law (Cal. Gov’t Code §65915) allows for density bonuses and additional incentives for affordable housing. Cal. Gov’t Code §65913 expedites state and local residential development, assuring local agencies can sufficiently zone for affordable housing, and encourage and incentivize affordable housing. Recent changes to the State Density Bonus Law increase the density bonus and other concessions for 100 percent affordable housing projects. Housing projects with a minimum of 80 percent low income units and up to 20 percent moderate income units are eligible for a density bonus of up to 80 percent the maximum allowed density or a density bonus with no limit if located within ½ mile of a major transit stop and qualify for at least four concessions, reduced parking requirements, and a height increase of up to three stories or 33 feet when located within ½ mile of a major transit stop. Housing for Persons with Disabilities Various provisions in both federal and State law limit the authority of local agencies to regulate facilities for mentally and physically handicapped persons. In 1988, Congress extended the 1968 Fair Housing Act’s prohibitions against housing discrimination to include discrimination on the basis of handicap or familial status (families with children). The Federal Fair Housing Act Amendments (FHAA) defined "handicapped" to include persons with physical or mental disabilities and recovering alcoholics and drug addicts. The FHAA not only prevents communities from discriminating against handicapped individuals but also requires "reasonable accommodations in rules policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations are necessary to afford [handicapped persons an] equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling." The California Fair Employment and Housing Act, codified as Government Code Sections 12900 to 12996, reinforces provisions of federal statute to prohibit any unlawful discrimination against persons with disabilities. Page 712 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 34 The State Supreme Court has prohibited local agencies from limiting the number of persons unrelated by blood, marriage, or adoption who can reside in a single-family home. Pursuant to Cal. Health & Safety Code §1566.3, a residential care facility that serves six or fewer people is considered a residential use and its occupants, regardless of legal relation, are considered a family for purposes of residential use laws and zoning codes. Further, such a use shall not be included within the definition of a boarding house, rooming house, institution or home for the care of minors, the aged, or persons with mental health disorders, foster care home, guest home, rest home, community residence, or other similar term that implies that the residential facility is a business run for profit or differs in any other way from a family dwelling. Manufactured Housing The Land Use and Development Code is compliant with Cal. Gov’t Code §§65852.3-.5 which requires local agencies to allow the installation of manufactured homes certified under the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. §§5401 et seq.) on a foundation system, pursuant to Cal. Health & Safety Code §1855, on lots zoned for single-family dwellings. Adult Oriented Businesses Local agencies may regulate, pursuant to a content-neutral ordinance, the time, place, and manner of operation of sexually-oriented business when the ordinance serves a substantial government interest, does not unreasonably limit alternative avenues of communication, and is based on narrow, objective, and definite standards (Cal. Gov’t Code §65850.4). Through the Zoning Ordinance update, regulations must ensure there are a reasonable range of alternative sites where adult-oriented businesses may be located. Coastal Act In 1976, the California Coastal Act was passed to protect coastal resources and maximize public access to the shoreline in the coastal zone, which is designated by the State Legislature. As part of the Coastal Act, local governments can prepare and implement Local Coastal Programs (LCPs) that are consistent with and achieve the objectives of the Coastal Act. The Coastal Act gives priority to: • Coastal-dependent and coastal-related uses and activities, such as commercial fishing, recreational boating and water-oriented recreational activities; • Coastal access and recreational needs, such as public coastal access and recreation, along with consideration of traffic, parking, circulation and infrastructure needs; and Page 713 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 35 • Environmentally sensitive areas, including the protection and restoration of water quality and sensitive habitat areas, along with consideration of shoreline erosion and sea level rise. Once an LCP is approved by the Coastal Commission, local governments have the responsibility of issuing coastal permits for most new development, subject to the standards set in the certified LCP. Each LCP consists of a local coastal land use plan, which the City drafted with the PLAN Hermosa effort and is preparing to submit to the Coastal Commission for certification, and an implementation plan consisting of measures to implement the plan (primarily the Zoning Ordinance). Thus, the Zoning Ordinance must conform with and carry out the local coastal land use plan. Cottage Food Operations Pursuant to Cal. Gov't Code §51035, a city or county may not prohibit cottage food operations (homemade and packaged food defined in Cal. Health & Safety Code §113758) in any residential dwelling, but shall do one of the following: Classify the use as a permitted use in any residential zone, grant a nondiscretionary permit for the use, or require a permit for the use. Emergency Shelters; Transitional and Supportive Uses Cal. Gov’t Code §§65582, 65583, and 65589.5 require each local government to: 1) amend its Code to identify district(s) where emergency shelters are allowed as a permitted use without a conditional use or other discretionary permit to include sufficient capacity to accommodate the need for emergency shelter identified in the housing element, and 2) treat transitional and supportive housing as a residential use of the property subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same district. Cal. Gov’t Code §65582 contains definitions for "supportive housing," "target population," and "transitional housing" to be more specific to housing element law. AB2162 requires that supportive housing be a use by right in districts where multifamily and mixed uses are permitted, including nonresidential districts permitting multifamily uses, if the proposed housing development meets specified criteria, and requires a local government to approve, within specified periods, a supportive housing development that complies with these requirements. Local governments are prohibited from imposing any minimum parking requirement for units occupied by supportive housing residents if the development is located within ½ mile of a public transit stop. Page 714 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 36 Family Day Care Homes Pursuant to Cal. Health & Safety Code §§1597.30 et seq., small family day care homes in a residential unit is a residential use and is not subject to a fee or business license. Large family day care homes may not be prohibited in any district where residential is allowed, but a city or county shall do one of the following: classify the use as a permitted residential use, grant a non- discretionary permit for the use, or require a permit for the use. However, zoning requirements for large family day care home must be reasonable and are limited to spacing and concentration, traffic control, parking, and noise control. Noise control standards must be consistent with the general noise ordinance and must take noise levels generated by children into consideration. Processing and Review Procedures State law specifies a number of processing requirements and review procedures related to land use regulation. These include procedures and requirements for development agreements (Cal. Gov't Code §§65864 et seq.), general plan consistency (Cal. Gov't Code §65860), permit review timelines (Cal. Gov't Code §§65920 et seq.), prezoning land upon annexation (Cal. Gov't Code §65859), notice of public hearings (Cal. Gov't Code §§65090 et seq.), variances (Cal. Gov't Code §§65900 et seq.), and zoning amendment procedures Cal. Gov't Code §§65853 et seq.). Religious Uses The Federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA) requires public agencies to demonstrate a compelling government interest and to use the least restrictive means when making a land use decision that imposes a substantial burden on religious exercise. Religious uses must be treated the same as similar non-religious uses. Additionally, regulations cannot impose a substantial burden to religious exercise. Signs In June 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Reed v. Town of Gilbert (No. 135 S.CT. 2218, 2015) affirmed that sign regulations must be “content-neutral” to survive a legal challenge. In order to be content-neutral and satisfy First Amendment limitations, sign regulations must be based on “time, place, and manner” restrictions, rather than by content- or message-based restrictions. Content-based regulations are subject to what is called a “strict scrutiny” standard – that is, a compelling governmental interest must be demonstrated and regulations must be narrowly tailored to serve that interest. Solar Energy Systems Cal. Gov't Code §65850.5 requires that solar energy systems be approved administratively with requirements limited to health and safety requirements per local, State, and federal law and those Page 715 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 37 necessary to ensure systems will not have a specific, adverse impact on public health or safety. A use permit may be required if the building official makes a finding based on substantial evidence that a specific, adverse impact on public health or safety would result. Every city and county is required to have an ordinance expediting permitting for small residential rooftop solar energy systems. Telecommunications The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 Limits state or local governments' authority to regulate placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities. State or local governments must not unreasonably discriminate against providers of functionally equivalent services and not prohibit or effectually prohibit use of personal wireless devices. Further, state or local governments shall not regulate placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities based on the environmental effect of radio frequency emissions, to the extent that such facilities comply with FCC regulations. Cal. Gov't Code § 65850.6 requires a city or county to ministerially approve an application for a co-location facility on or immediately adjacent to an existing wireless telecommunications co-location facility. It also prohibits a city or county from imposing certain conditions of approval on permits for construction or reconstruction of wireless telecommunications facility. Water Conservation and Landscaping Cal. Gov't Code §53087.7 prohibits cities or counties from enacting any regulation that substantially increases the cost of installing, effectively prohibits, or significantly impedes the installation drought tolerant landscaping, synthetic grass, or artificial turf on residential property. The Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 (Cal. Gov't Code §65597) requires local agencies to adopt the updated Department of Water Resources (DWR) Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO) or a local landscape ordinance that is at least as effective in conserving water. Page 716 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 38 APPENDIX A ORDINANCE USER INTERVIEW SUMMARY Introduction As part of the initial evaluation of the current Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, the consultant team conducted a series of interviews with a range of “ordinance users”– people who have utilized the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances in Hermosa Beach and/or have a specific interest in regulations that will implement the updated General Plan/Local Coastal Plan–to understand the concerns and issues associated with updating the ordinances. The ordinance users interviewed encompassed a variety of people, which included: landowners, developers, architects, real estate professionals, and designers. The City’s consultants conducted eight hour-long interview sessions on March 4, 2020, in addition to two phone interviews on March 12, 2020. A total of 31 code users in groups of one to five people were interviewed. The confidential interviews were conducted by staff from the consulting team– Martha Miller of Miller Planning Associates and Diane Bathgate of RRM Design Group. No staff members were present during the interviews to encourage candid responses. Participants were asked a series of questions regarding overarching concerns as well as specific topics related to the City’s Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. People attending were also given the opportunity to discuss issues of significance to them that were not otherwise discussed or addressed from the facilitated questions. Themes A strong consensus among code users emerged about what major issues are. While ordinance users may ultimately differ on precise changes to take, there was clear agreement that the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances require modifications to be more understandable, to reflect existing conditions, and to achieve major City policy goals. Generally, ordinance users thought the City’s regulations were outdated and in need of improvement in order to achieve the community’s vision for the future. Following is a list of major themes heard during the interviews. A comprehensive list of comments received, organized by topic, is attached. 1. Do not regulate based on the worst-case scenario. • This approach causes unintended consequences that often obstruct the ability to achieve other city goals. 2. Make the regulations easier to use, understand, and interpret. Page 717 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 39 • Include practices and interpretations currently used, but not officially documented and apply regulations with a “common sense” mindset. 3. Parking requirements are a major obstacle to investment and reinvestment. • Reduce parking requirements and incorporate flexibility, particularly for nonresidential uses. 4. Allow a wider variety of uses to occupy vacant spaces and generate activity, particularly in the Downtown and along corridors. 5. Align Downtown regulations and processes with market-driven strategies for reinvestment. 6. Clarify the review process and make it less onerous. • Adjust review bodies and processes to more appropriately reflect the significance of a project. Comments General Comments • The Zoning Ordinance is very cumbersome to work with. It’s hard to find things if you are not familiar with it. It’s hard for the first 10 years, the next 20 years of working with it are not so bad. • There are so many little idiosyncrasies in the Ordinance that you would not know if you didn’t work with it on other projects. • PLAN Hermosa policies and implementing actions should be evaluated to determine what should be addressed in the Zoning Ordinance and what should be addressed in other parts of the Municipal Code or through other means. • The City’s approach seems to be that everyone gets punished when they have issues with a few. The City tends to overreact. • In general, there is a fear of change. • City receives generational mixed messages. Now is completely opposite from previous vision. What is the desired image for the City? Boutique? Party? Quiet? • The Zoning Code lacks incentives to revitalize. • Redevelopment efforts in downtown are a “nightmare.” • Focus on the vision in PLAN Hermosa, not incremental change. • Clearer rules and regulations, all written down to minimize multiple interpretations. • Keep density to what residents want, do not facilitate overdevelopment. • Improving review processes to be more predictable and streamlined would entice more investment and improvement, especially important for downtown Hermosa Beach. Page 718 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 40 • There is a need to build more housing. • Provide for more gathering and placemaking opportunities. • Align regulations to support market-driven reinvestment. • Hermosa Beach deserves a better downtown. • Address catalyst properties and need City leadership. Design and Development Standards • A lot of policy is interpreted through the code; that makes it hard. For example, the way to determine height was first changed based on a policy for interpretation. Another example is determining whether a portion of a garage is below grade. The language in the Ordinance says to take natural grade but when the City analyzed the project, they used a straight-line method to determine grade. That was different from how Staff applied the exact same standard previously. The Ordinance language didn’t change, the interpretation of how to apply it did. • Trash issue – City wanted to take away shared facilities, ordinance passed, knee jerk response to restaurants not keeping clean. Need to look at larger context and implications, not just specific case. • Small lots – make one threshold. • Open space and parking requirements can conflict. • Lot coverage and open space requirements can be redundant and need to be loosened up (“it’s now like a Rubik’s Cube). • Allow more flexibility with renovations, allow full renovations without bringing all up to code. • Important to allow for condominiums and consider reduction in size. • Modify exceptions for building height (increase from 5 percent). • R-1 zone problems with alley garage, parking in the rear, and open space compliance (for example, on Myrtle Street can push whole building back and never reach compliance). • Open space regulations currently require 10 feet by 10 feet space - provides a disincentive for varied walls and good design. • R-1 and R-2 have different interpretations of open space requirements – make consistent. • Recommend being able to allow side yard to be used toward open space requirement. • Consider allowing half of front yard toward open space for an alley condition. • For public right-of-way between parkway and lot, need consistency in regulations and a mechanism for future removal of improvements (bond, grant deed, etc.) • Reconcile General Plan and Code conflicts regarding sidewalk encroachments. Page 719 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 41 • Alley access is encouraged in PLAN Hermosa, but it is not in the Zoning Code. • The sign ordinance is confusing, such as fascia board requirements allow for a too big of a range and only one wall sign is allowed per business. • Design standards are lacking except for SPA-11 area. Need guidance for: – Window glazing - do not want highly reflective glazing, needs to be added to Code. – Murals – need clarifying direction as now can apply to front wall or glazing but consider allowing stepping back graphic a foot or two. – Drive-through uses – now need a use permit, in conflict with carbon neutrality goals, consider standard for new drive-throughs. – Lot mergers/subdivisions – now new lots must be 4,000 square feet in size, consider consistencies with adjacent lots, ownership ties, require lot mergers for R-1 lots only. • Reconsider building heights and floor area ratio (FAR) regulations, are currently disincentives to redevelop. • Clarify how side yards are measured (for example, existing requirement is 10 percent with 3 feet clear). • Clarify regulations regarding convex slopes, need to apply more common sense. • Have many legal nonconforming lots, consider mergers and other strategies. • Allow buildings of three stories, consistent with character. • Require more trees (consider shorter species in consideration of view protection). • Consider changing building height methodology. • Need standards tailored for each neighborhood/area. • Enhance requirements for more permeable surfaces where possible. Land Use Regulations • The community is concerned with construction impacts. The City is small, and the lots are small. Nothing can be built without impacting neighbors. Maybe there is a need for a construction ordinance. • The way traffic impacts are considered will change as the traffic impact analysis shifts to consideration of vehicle miles travelled (VMT). How the City decides to manage VMT should get wrapped into the Zoning Ordinance. • Sometimes new uses that on their own create additional vehicle trips, actually reduce the overall number and length of vehicle trips when located in already developed areas. A Page 720 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 42 commercial use that adds diversity in a built area can reduce trips because people are already in an area and can meet that need without going to another location. • The jobs/housing imbalance in the City is exasperated by the Zoning Ordinance. The basic environmental issues in Hermosa Beach is affordable housing. • Mixed-use zoning would be appropriate for the PCH corridor • Reconsider conditional use permits to be more context appropriate (for example, allow full liquor CUP use to stay open past 10 pm on Friday, Saturday and Sunday nights). Make an allowable use or less stringent when not adjacent to residential. • The current open space rules sometimes push bad design. • Restaurants and party businesses should be treated differently. Restaurants should not require a CUP. • Reconsider ground floor uses to allow for creative office or office, especially in areas not as desirable for restaurant or retail (such as outskirts of downtown). This could help address Hermosa Beach’s lack of weekday, daytime population to support businesses. • Revisit assembly CUP thresholds (anything over 15 people needs CUP process which may be appropriate for a church, but not for new fitness use). • Add regulations for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) into Code and consider providing shelf ready, pre-drawn plans and allowing pre-fabricated options. • Add in requirements of SB 1818 and SB 330 into Code. • Reduce loopholes in Local Coastal Program (LCP). • For historic resources, need to be clear on regulations. • Frontage requirements along the Strand (3 feet, 9 feet or 17 feet setbacks) are impediments to design (not effective at original intent of discouraging parking behind units). • Condominium developments do not need to go to Planning Commission. • Reconcile mixed use direction between General Plan (discouraged) and Zoning Code (allowed). • In the Cypress Avenue area, loosen up light industrial/manufacturing regulations to allow for other uses (such as brewery, coffee house, galleries, architecture offices, incidental retail, other arts-related uses) and consider performance standards to ensure compatibility with neighboring residences. • Clarify and make consistent parking/driveway allowances (now inconsistent between single family and multi-family). • Clarify downhill slope transition requirements to ensure public water is not going onto private, downward driveways (sometimes request concrete swale or trench drain). Page 721 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 43 • For the Building Code, City uses California Code with a few modifications, and it works pretty well with the Zoning Code. Sometimes a conflict arises, such as with low impact development (LID) using rain barrels in the side yard for onsite water retention. • Regarding the M-1 zone, there are many different opinions and perspectives on current and future use and it is not designed well for public access. Current Planning Commission direction allows retail only with a temporary event permit. • Allow for mixed use (with residential or office above commercial) and address parking concerns. • Reconcile differences between California Coastal Commission, State, and City regarding housing requirements such as with ADUs, JADUs, FAR, etc. • Office uses should be allowed in commercial zones, even if need to limit amount of square footage or require to be above ground floor. • Establish adaptive reuse requirements. • Hermosa Beach generally has a “one size fits all” approach to multi-family zoning regulations but have some very different neighborhoods so requirements need to be more tailored. For example, 400 square feet of open space is required regardless of lot size – consider percentage requirement. • Remove building separation standard on same site (only really applies to past design patterns). • Ensure compatibility between uses such as between commercial and residential uses, especially important for small, compact patterns in Hermosa Beach. Parking Regulations • Parking is the issue that holds up projects. The City could address this by being more flexible on parking. • City needs to catch up with the State and revisit parking along the transit corridor (PCH). • Parking is the number one issue when requesting approvals. • City needs to build in-lieu space parking structure and has the funds. • In-lieu parking program previously approved is now not available and is unfair. • Commercial uses get push back from neighborhoods and City does not enforce residents to use garages. • Encourage Uber, Lyft, shuttle, buses and messaging that may need to walk a bit. • Consider 20 percent parking requirement if provide bicycle racks. • City may have overissued resident parking passes. • The parking variance process is too onerous, expensive, lengthy and risky. Page 722 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 44 • Need to be forward thinking with parking strategies. • Consider public private partnership (PPP) approach to building a parking structure south of Sharkeez. • Recommend not requiring parking for small businesses. • Consider no parking for historic resources. • Revisit parking recommendations in the Downtown Strategic Plan. • City’s current parking regulations are outdated. • Have observed inconsistent treatment for waiving parking, need more consistency. • Move downtown parking inland so folks will need to walk by retail/stores. • Employees have no dedicated parking area. • Two-hour parking limit is too restrictive for dining/restaurants. • Parking is only an issue primarily on weekends. • Concerned with ADU garage conversions as there is no requirement for additional parking. • Reduce and eliminate off-street parking requirements. • Allow use of shared parking between private and public uses. Zoning Administration and Process • The City’s planning review process is ridiculous. Over the last four years or so, it has become extremely difficult. Staff will not talk to you about a project unless you make an appointment. Even if you simply want to drop off plans, you must have an appointment. This is cumbersome. Also, if you are missing anything, Staff will not accept the project. The problem is, they are just doing a partial plan check at the counter. So even if you correct that, they haven’t looked at everything and they will give you corrections again. It goes on and on. • The level of detail in plans required for planning review is excessive. The City basically requires you to prepare engineering drawings before you even know if a project is viable. Engineered plans are required too early in the entitlement process. • Of all jurisdictions I’ve worked in, Hermosa Beach used to be the most straightforward and common sense in their review. Now they are the worst. • Hermosa Beach doesn’t have design review, which is a good thing. • Lengthy process to entitle hotel at 14th Street and Hermosa Avenue. • Due to the length of the development process and EIR, project is now on hold and requires new financing. Page 723 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 45 • Time to get things approved is abnormally long due to stringent policies and general complacency at all levels (for example, patio approval along the Strand took a year and half). • City is good at processing routine items, much longer times if there are different interests involved. • Regulations are not always easily apparent, and everything goes to Planning Commission (for example, reduction of seats at a brewery went to Planning Commission and cost $6500). • Changes in staff result in different direction and can cause confusion. • Staff is helpful, accessible, and open to discussion, and provides complete information on what needs to be submitted. • Planning Commission discusses and adds restrictions if no issues or neighbor testimony. • Consider administrative approval unless comments are received and then take to a public meeting (Director, Zoning Administrator, or Planning Commission). • Applicants do not receive comments ahead of meetings and can be blindsided (for example, applicant not allowed to review screencheck EIR). • Would like more certainty in the process. • Consider better forums and opportunities to work out issues. • Code interpretations sometimes are unwritten rules that applicant finds out after the fact. • Make sure there are clear inspection standards. • Planning and Public Works sometimes do not communicate well which can result in conflicting requirements. Provide clearer areas of responsibility for site planning and for right of way, such as with grading and drainage. • Remove requirement to submit materials on CD (too antiquated). • For convex slope determinations, change from Planning Commission level to administrative (Director), but appealable. • Allow more decisions to be made at the administrative level (such as minor modifications, use permits, others). • Establish one point in time to bring lots into conformance (remove structure, merge, or fire wall). • Change of use request process is too long and too expensive (since go to Planning Commission) and is a disincentive for new small businesses. Consider more ministerial/administrative processes to be business friendly. • Provide a process for including critical points so can be reviewed in the field with plan set. • Recommend interdepartmental routing of conceptual plans, include summary “up front” of requirements for all departments, and enhance interdepartmental communication. Page 724 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach 46 • Regarding survey standards, require corner monuments and verifications that ties were established/set, filed and inspected in the field. • Provide a written, digital checklist on website of requirements. • Single-family related applications do not need to be reviewed by Planning Commission if comply with rules. Example References • Redondo Beach’s Code is pretty good. • Manhattan Beach’s Code is cumbersome but tailored. The Planning Department put together tools to help streamline the process. For residential projects, they have a check sheet with every code that is related to project. It’s a helpful tool to use when designing a project. • For parking, City of Los Angeles allows fractions of parking spaces or replacement with bicycle racks. • For parking, West Hollywood does not require parking for uses less than 10,000 square feet. • Look into Urban Land Institute (ULI) strategies for shared parking. • Review City of Long Beach example regarding limitations on drive-through uses. • Manhattan Beach has good regulations for ADUs and Junior ADUs including a streamlined process. • Torrance has a “one stop” desk that covers requirements of all departments. • El Segundo “Sleepy Hollow” is a good example of a creative office district. • Look at potential parking approaches in Manhattan Beach and El Segundo to help “right size” parking requirements and provide flexibility. • Coastal Commission has become more accepting of parking changes, see examples in Santa Monica and San Diego. Page 725 of 1339 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Assessment Report 47 List of Interviewees Adam Eisenberg Bob Healey Bob Rollins Brandon Straus Chrissie Grasso Christie Teague Dean Nota Ed Almanza Fran Uralman George Schmeltzer George Shweiri Jason Muller John Starr Jon Davide Jonathan Wicks Karynne Thim Larry Peha Laura Pena Lisa Ryder Lori Ford Maria Islas Maryl Binney Michelle Licata Mike Grannis Mike Levine Mike Wally Nicole Ellis Peter Nolan Stacey Straus Stefan Schmandt William “Bill” Errett Page 726 of 1339 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Note to Reader: The following exhibits to the ordinance are provided in annotated redline format to highlight edits made to the proposed amendment since the Planning Commission's public hearing. Additions and relocated text are shown in underline while deletions appear as strikethrough text. These revisions have been made to reflect Planning Commission direction as well as edits improve readability, clarify regulations, and ensure the City’s code follows State law and implements the General Plan. Some Chapter numbers have been revised or relocated to better incorporate these changes into the code. EXHIBIT A CHAPTER 17.01 – INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS Chapter 17.01 (Introductory Provisions) is hereby added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.01 Introductory Provisions 17.01.010 Title Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be known and cited as the “Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance”, “Zoning Ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach”, or “Zoning Ordinance.” 17.01.020 Purpose The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to implement the City’s General Plan and to protect and promote the public health, safety, peace, comfort, convenience, prosperity, and general welfare. More specifically, the Zoning Ordinance is adopted to achieve the following objectives: A. Provide standards for the orderly growth and development of the City, and guide and control the use of land to provide a safe, harmonious, attractive, and sustainable community. B. Achieve the arrangement of land uses depicted in the Hermosa Beach General Plan, consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Commented [HB1]: This section establishes the legal framework for the zoning code. Edits enhance the readability and increase the enforceability of the code. Page 727 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 2 of 95 C. Enhance the appearance of the City and promote high-quality design. D. Preserve and enhance the quality of life and character of residential neighborhoods. E. Promote economic growth and the creation of jobs. F. Facilitate the appropriate location of community facilities, institutions, transportation, and parks and recreational areas. G. Allow for public participation in government decision-making regarding land use and development in a manner consistent with State law. H. Define duties and powers of administrative bodies and officers responsible for implementation of the Zoning Ordinance. 17.01.030 Authority The Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority contained in Section 65850 of the California Government Code. 17.01.040 Relationship to the General Plan This Zoning Ordinance implements the goals and policies of PLAN Hermosa, the city’s adopted Hermosa Beach General Plan, and Coastal Land Use Plan, by regulating the use of land and structures within the City. Any permit, license, or approval issued pursuant to this Zoning Ordinance must be consistent with the General Plan and all applicable specific plans. 17.01.050 Applicability A. Applicability to Property. This Zoning Ordinance shall apply, to the extent permitted by law, to all property within the corporate limits of the City of Hermosa Beach and to property for which applications for development and/or subdivisions have been submitted to the City of Hermosa Beach, including all uses, structures, and land owned by any private person, firm, corporation or organization, or the City of Hermosa Beach or other local, State, or Federal agencies. Any governmental agency shall be exempt from the provisions of this Zoning Ordinance only to the extent that such property may not be lawfully regulated by the City. Page 728 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 3 of 95 B. Minimum Requirements. The provisions of this Zoning Ordinance shall be deemed the minimum requirements for the promotion of the public health, safety, and general welfare. Where this Zoning Ordinance provides for more discretion on the part of a City official or body, that discretion may be exercised to impose more stringent requirements than set forth in this Zoning Ordinance as may be necessary to promote orderly land use development and the purposes of this Zoning Ordinance. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require or allow a City official or body to exercise its discretion in a manner that would be contrary to state or Federal law. C. Compliance with Regulations. No land shall be used, and no structure shall be constructed, occupied, enlarged, altered, demolished, or moved in any zone, except in accordance with the provisions of this Zoning Ordinance, including the development and performance standards herein, and any permit issued pursuant hereto. The temporary or transitory nature of a use does not exempt it from this requirement. D. Conflicting Regulations. The regulations of this Zoning Ordinance and requirements or conditions imposed pursuant to this Zoning Ordinance shall not supersede any other regulations or requirements adopted or imposed by the Hermosa Beach City Council, the State of California, or any Federal agency that has jurisdiction by law over uses and development authorized by this Zoning Ordinance. All uses and development authorized by this Zoning Ordinance shall comply with all other such regulations and requirements. The regulations of this Zoning Ordinance and requirements or conditions imposed pursuant to this Zoning Ordinance shall not supersede any other regulations or requirements adopted or imposed by the Hermosa Beach City Council, the State of California, or any Federal agency that has jurisdiction by law over uses and development authorized by this Zoning Ordinance. All uses and development authorized by this Zoning Ordinance shall comply with all other such regulations and requirements. Where conflict occurs between the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and any other City ordinance, chapter, resolution, guideline, or regulation, the more restrictive provisions shall control, unless otherwise legally required. All uses and development authorized by this Zoning Ordinance shall comply with all other such regulations and requirements. E. Private Agreements. This Zoning Ordinance shall not interfere with or annul any recorded easement, covenant, or other agreement now in effect, Page 729 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 4 of 95 provided that where any recorded easement, covenant, or other agreement now in effect, is in conflict with state or federal law, or this Zoning Ordinance imposes a greater restriction than imposed by an easement, covenant, or agreement, this Zoning Ordinance shall control. The City of Hermosa Beach shall not be responsible for monitoring or enforcing private agreements. F. Prior Ordinance. The provisions of this Zoning Ordinance supersede all prior ordinances codified in Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code and any amendments. No provisions of this Zoning Ordinance shall validate any land use or structure established, constructed, or maintained in violation of the prior Zoning Ordinance, unless such land use or structure validation is specifically authorized by this Zoning Ordinance and is in conformance with all other regulations. G. Effect on Previously Approved Projects and Projects in Progress. 1. Building Permit. Any building or structure for which a Building Permit has been issued may be completed and used in accordance with the plans, specifications, and permits on which said Building Permit was granted, provided at least one inspection has been requested and posted for the primary structure on the site where the permit is issued and provided construction is diligently pursued and completed pursuant to the provisions of the California Building Code, as adopted by the City of Hermosa Beach. and completed within six months of permit issuance. No extensions of time except as provided for in the Building Code shall be granted for commencement of construction, unless the applicant has secured an allowed permit extension from the Community Development Department. 2. Previously Approved Land Use Authorization. This Zoning Ordinance shall not interfere with, repeal, abrogate, or annul any previously granted land use authorization, unless otherwise specified in this Title. Any land use or structure, which was previously legally established, and has been deemed nonconforming as a result of adoption of this Zoning Ordinance, shall be subject to Chapter 17.52 (Nonconforming Buildings and Uses). All allowances, requirements, permits, entitlements, and conditions of approval of previous land use authorizations shall apply until the applicable review authority specifically repeals the allowance, requirement of this Title, or condition. Page 730 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 5 of 95 3. Land Use Authorization in Process. An application for a discretionary land use authorization that has been accepted by the Community Development Department as complete for processing prior to the adoption of this Zoning Ordinance or any applicable amendment shall be processed according to the requirements of this Zoning Ordinance or the prior Zoning Ordinance upon written request from the project applicant. The written request shall be made no later than 30 days after the effective date of this Zoning Ordinance and at least one action must be taken by the review authority within 210 days of the effective date of this Zoning Ordinance. H. Application During Local Emergency. The City Council may authorize a deviation from a provision of this Zoning Ordinance during a local emergency declared and ratified under the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. The City Council may authorize a deviation by resolution without notice or public hearing. 17.01.060 Responsibility for Administration The Zoning Ordinance shall be administered by the Hermosa Beach City Council, Planning Commission, and Community Development Department as established in Chapter TBD17.02, Planning Zoning Review Authorities. 17.01.070 Permissive Ordinance This title shall be considered a permissive ordinance, whereby only those uses, structures, or facilities that are authorized hereby are allowed, except as provided through an administrative determination, an administrative use permit, or other discretionary action. 17.01.080 Severability If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Zoning Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Zoning Ordinance. The Hermosa Beach City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Zoning Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof, regardless of Page 731 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 6 of 95 the fact that any or one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 17.01.090 Fees The City Council shall establish by resolution, and may amend and revise from time to time, fees for processing the discretionary entitlement applications and other permits authorized or required by this Zoning Ordinance, as well as the necessary fees to mitigate impacts, as allowed by State law. All fees shall be paid at the time an application is filed, and no processing shall commence until the fees are paid in full. 17.01.100 Penalty A. Violations of zoning regulations. Violations of the provisions of this title shall be subject to the administrative penalty provisions of Chapter 1.10. B. Each day a separate offense. Each person, firm or corporation found guilty of a violation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for every day during any portion of which any violation of any provision of this title is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm or corporation, and any use, occupation or building or structure maintained contrary to the provisions hereof shall constitute a public nuisance. C. Violation of conditions of conditional use permits and precise development plans. No person shall violate any conditions of a conditional use permit or precise development plan. Such violations shall be subject to the administrative penalty provisions of Chapter 1.10 in addition to the measures set out in Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). Commented [HB2]: The penalty provisions apply to people who violate the zoning code. All these provisions are currently contained in Chapter 17.74 Page 732 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 7 of 95 EXHIBIT B CHAPTER 17.02 – ZONING REVIEW AUTHORITES Chapter 17.02 (Declaration of Purpose) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.02 (Zoning Review Authorities) ) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.02 Zoning Review Authorities 17.02.010 Purpose This Chapter lays out the basic roles, responsibilities, and functions of all planning authorities under this Title, including the City Council, Planning Commission, and Community Development Director (Director). 17.02.020 City Council The powers and responsibilities of the City Council include, but are not limited to the following: A. Consider and adopt, deny, or modify proposed General Plan Amendments, Local Coastal Program, Specific Plans, and environmental documents related to any of the foregoing, pursuant to Chapter TBD17.17, (General Plan Amendments). B. Consider and adopt, reject deny or modify proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map and environmental documents related to any of the foregoing, pursuant to Chapter TBD17.16, (Zoning Amendments). C. Consider and adopt, rejectdeny, or modify Development Agreements, following a public hearing and recommended action by the Planning Commission, pursuant to Chapter TBD17.14, (Development Agreements). D. Hear and decide appeals from decisions of the Planning Commission pursuant to Section TBD Section 17.03.120, (Appeals and Calls for Review). E. Establish, by resolution, a Master Fee Scheule Schedule charges, and deposits for various applications and services provided, pursuant to Title Commented [HB3]: This section provides the City Council, Planning Commission, and Community Development Director authority to review applications. Additionally, is specifies the type of application and who would be the review authority (City Council, Planning Commission, or Community Development Director). Additional edits were to enhance the readability, combine administrative items into a single permit, and expand the public noticing. Page 733 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 8 of 95 2Chapter 2.64 (Fees and Service Charges). 17.02.030 Planning Commission The powers and responsibilities of the Planning Commission include, but are not limited to the following: A. Annually review of progress towards implementation of the General Plan and make recommendations to the City Council based on any new legislation, development trends, or changing economic, social, and environmental conditions. B. Approve, modify, or deny Precise Development Plans, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, and Certificates of Appropriateness, and other entitlements as outlined in Section 17.02.050 (Review Authorities for Decisions and Appeals). C. Make recommendations to the City Council on Development Agreements. D. Make recommendations to City Council on proposed amendments to the General Plan, Specific Plan(s), Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map and environmental documents determinations related to any of the foregoing. E. Hear and approve, modify, or deny decide appeals from decisions of the Community Development Director. F. Hear and approve, modify, or deny decide proposals to revoke permits, pursuant to Section TBD17.03.110, (Revocation of Permits). G. Make environmental determinations on any approvals powers and responsibilities listed in this section and that are subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant toexcept as excluded above. State law. H. Such other powers and responsibilities as assigned or directed by the City Council. Page 734 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 9 of 95 17.02.040 Community Development Director The powers and responsibilities of the Community Development Director (“the Director”), or their designee, include, but are not limited to the following: A. Maintain, interpret, and administer the Zoning Ordinance, including the processing of applications, abatements, interpretations, and other enforcement actions. 1. Assist in the use of the Zoning Ordinance for by members of the public and other City departments. B. Review applications for permits and licenses for conformance with this Title and issue a Zoning Clearance when the proposed use, activity or building is allowed by right and conforms to all applicable development and use standards. C. Approve, modify, or deny Minor Use Permits, as authorized pursuant to Section 17.02.050 (Review Authorities for Decisions and Appeals)Chapter TBD, Use Permits. D. Initiate Specific Plans and related amendments; zoning code and zoning maps Amendments; and General Plan Amendments, including amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map. E. Refer items to the Planning Commission where, in the Director’s determination, the public interest would be better served by a Planning Commission public hearing and action. 2. Approve, modify, or deny Temporary Use Permits, pursuant to Chapter TBD, Temporary Use Permits. 3. Approve, modify, or deny a modification, pursuant to Chapter TBD, Modifications. 4. Approve, modify, or deny requests for Reasonable Accommodation for land use projects, pursuant to Chapter TBD, Reasonable Accommodation. Page 735 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 10 of 95 5. Decide requests for Minor Revisions to Approved Permits, pursuant to Section TBD, Revisions to an Approved Permit. 6. Refer items to the Planning Commission where, in the Director’s determination, the public interest would be better served by a Planning Commission public hearing and action. F. Make environmental determinations on any powers and responsibilities listed in this section and that are subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to State law. 7. Oversee the preparation of environmental review for various entitlements and make environmental determinations for any discretionary review for which the Community Development Director is the review authority in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to State law. G. Make recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council on all applications, appeals, and other matters upon which they have the authority and the responsibility to act under this Title. H. Investigate and report to the Planning Commission on permit violations when the City has initiated revocation procedures, pursuant to Section TBD, Revocation of Permits. I. Delegate administrative functions to members of the Community Development Department. J. Other duties and powers as may be assigned by the City Manager or may be established through legislation. 17.02.050 Review Authorities for Decisions and Appeals Summary of Review Authorities for Decisions and Appeals, summarizes the powers and duties that each review authority has under this Title. Where a project requires more than one type of application, all permit requests shall may be reviewed and decided on by the highest review authority established for any of the applications. Page 736 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 11 of 95 The Community Development Director may refer any item for which the Director makes a determination to the Planning Commission where, in the Director’s opinion, the public interest would be better served by a Planning Commission public hearing and action. SUMMARY OF REVIEW AUTHORITIES FOR DECISIONS AND APPEALS Decision Type  Advisory Body  Review Authority * Appeal Body  Public Notification Ministerial Action Zoning Clearance - Staff/Director DirectorN/A No Administrative Action Administrativ e Permit Emergency Shelters - Director Planning Commission No Entertainmen t, Limited Live - Director Planning Commission No Limited Outdoor Seating - Director Planning Commission No Low Barrier Navigation Centers - Director Planning Commission1 No Residential Care Facility - Director Planning Commission No Short Term Vacation Rental - Director Planning Commission No Supportive Housing (up to 50 units) - Director Planning Commission1 No Temporary Use and Temporary Events - Director Planning Commission No Convex Slope Determination - Director Planning Commission Yes Temporary Use Permit Director Planning Commission No Page 737 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 12 of 95 SUMMARY OF REVIEW AUTHORITIES FOR DECISIONS AND APPEALS Decision Type  Advisory Body  Review Authority * Appeal Body  Public Notification Portable A- Frame - Director Planning Commission No Temporary Sign Permit Alternative Grade Determination - Director Planning Commission No Reasonable Accommodation - Building Official Director Planning Commission1 No Minor Modification Director N/A No Zoning and Similar Use Interpretation - Director Planning Commission No Quasi-Judicial ActionEntitlement Action Certificate of Appropriate ness Minor Director Planning Commission N/A-City Council Yes Major Director Planning Commission City Council Conditional Use Permit - Planning Commission City Council Yes Minor Use Permit - Director Planning Commission Yes Variance - Planning Commission City Council Yes Minor Exception - Director Planning Commission Yes Parking Plan - Planning Commission City Council Yes Amendment to Planning Entitlement - Planning Commission City Council Yes Time Extension Request by original Review Authority - Planning Commission City Council Yes Precise Developmen t Plan Minor - Director Planning Commission Yes Major - Planning Commission City Council Yes Page 738 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 13 of 95 SUMMARY OF REVIEW AUTHORITIES FOR DECISIONS AND APPEALS Decision Type  Advisory Body  Review Authority * Appeal Body  Public Notification Determination of Legality of Nonconforming Residential Buildings - Planning Commission City Council Yes Zoning Interpretation - Director Planning Commission No Similar Use Determination - Director Planning Commission No Legislative Action General Plan Amendment Planning Commission City Council - Yes Specific Plan Specific Plan Amendment Planning Commission City Council - Yes Zoning Amendment s Zone Text Amendment Planning Commission City Council - Yes Zone Change Planning Commission City Council - Yes Development Agreement Planning Commission City Council - Yes Historic Landmark Nomination Planning Commission City Council - - Yes (1) Subject to appeal only if denied by the Director. Page 739 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 14 of 95 EXHIBIT C CHAPTER 17.03 – ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES Chapter 17.03 (Administrative Procedures) is hereby added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.03 Administrative Procedures 17.03.010 Purpose This Chapter establishes uniform procedures for the preparation, filing, and processing of any land use permits and approvals entitlement applications provided for in this Title, unless superseded by a specific requirement of this Title or State law. 17.03.020 Application Forms and Fees A. Applicant. The owner of property or the owner’stheir authorized agent may submit applications for land use permits. If the application is made by someone other than the owner or the owner’s agent, proof of the right to represent the owner shall accompany the application. The Director shall prepare and issue application forms and lists that specify the information required from applicants. If the application is made by someone other than the owner or theAn owner’s agent, shall provide proof of the right to represent the owner in matters regarding the application, to use and possess the property as applied for, which is satisfactory to the Community Development Director., shall accompany the application. B. Application Materials. 1. Application Forms and Fees. Applications for land use permits, which are authorized by this Title, shall be filed on forms prepared by the Director, which may be modified from time to time. Applications shall be accompanied by all required fees as outlined in the Master Fee Schedule. The Director shall prepare and issue application forms and lists that specify the information that will be required from applicants for projects subject to the provisions of this Title. The Director shall publish and make available a list of submittal requirements, including required application fees, on the City’s website and at the Community Development Department office. 2. Supporting Materials. The Director shall provide a list of may require Commented [HB4]: This section establishes several administrative procedures, including: How the City reviews and approves permits, including appeals of decisions. The type and amount of public notice that is required to be distributed for permits. How permits may be revoked or expire. Gives the Director the ability to interpret the zoning code. How accommodations to zoning standards can be granted to meet handicap accessibility for structures and buildings. Edits improve the readability and remove duplicate requirements. Additional categories have been added to the public noticing requirements to ensure consistency with State law. Page 740 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 15 of 95 the submisson of supporting materials that shall be submitted as part of the application. , including but not This may include, but is not limited to: statements, photographs, plans, drawings, renderings, models, material samples, technical studies, and other items necessary to describe existing conditions and the proposed project and determine the level of environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 3. Availability of Materials. All submitted material becomes the property of the City, may be distributed to the public, and shall be made available for public inspection. At any time, upon reasonable request, and during normal business hours, any person may examine application materials atmaterials at the Community Development Department office. Unless prohibited by law or superseded by specific permit confidentiality requirements, copies of application materials shall be made available. The City shall charge fees for copies in accordance with the fee resolution adopted by City Council. C. Multiple Applications. 1. Concurrent Filing. An applicant for a project which requires more than one land use permit by this Title (e.g., Conditional Use Permit, Variance, and Precise Development Plan, etc.), shall file all related applications concurrently, together with all application applicable fees. The concurrent filing requirements may be reduced in in accordance with the fee resolution adopted by the City Council. 2. Concurrent Processing. Multiple land use permits for the same project shall be processed concurrently and shall be reviewed and decided on by the highest review authority designated for any of the applications. , unless prohibited by State law. D. Application Fees. 1. Fee Schedule. The Council shall approve by resolution a Master Fee Schedule that establishes fees for permits, informational materials, penalties, copying, and other such items in accordance with Title 2. 2. Fee Payment. No application shall be deemed complete, and processing shall not commence on any application until all Page 741 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 16 of 95 required fees or deposits have been paid. Refund of Fees. Application fees are non-refundable regardless of the review authority's decision. Filing fees cover the costs incurred by the City for staff’s review of the application materials, preparation of required finings, notices, and postings. In the case of an application withdrawal prior to the public hearing notice, the Director, at the request of the applicant, may authorize a partial refund in accordance with department policy. 17.03.030 Review of Applications A. Initial Completeness Review. The Director shall determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the date the application is filed and required fee received. 1. Incomplete Application. If an application is deemed incomplete, the Director shall provide written notification to the applicant listing the applications for permit(s), forms, information, and any additional fees that are necessary to complete the application and specify a time limit for submittal of the requested information. The time limit to submit additional information shall be at least 30 days. a. Zoning Ordinance Violations. An application shall not be found complete if conditions exist on the site in violation of this Title or any permit or other approval granted in compliance with this Title, unless the proposed project includes the correction of the violations or, in the sole discretion of the Director, the application is deemed complete notwithstanding the violation. b. Appeal of Determination. Determinations of incompleteness are subject to the provisions of Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review)Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review, except there shall be a final written determination on the appeal no later than 60 days after receipt of the appeal. The fact that an appeal is permitted to both the Planning Commission and the City Council does not extend the 60-day period. Page 742 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 17 of 95 c. Expiration of Application. If an applicant fails to correct the specified deficiencies within the specific time limit pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension)Section TBD, A.1, the application shall expire and be deemed withdrawn, unless an extension is granted by the Director. After the expiration of an application, review shall require the submittal of a new, complete application, along with all required fees. 2. Complete Application. When an application is deemed complete, the Director shall make a record of that date. If an application requires a public hearing, the Director shall schedule it and notify the applicant of the date and time, pursuant to Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice)Section TBD, Public Notice. B. Referral of Application. At the discretion of the Director, or where otherwise required by this Title, State or Federal law, any application filed in compliance with this Title may be referred to any City department, public agency, or interest group that may be affected by or have an interest in the proposed land use project. C. Extensions. The Director may, upon written request and for good cause, grant extensions of any time limit for review of applications imposed by this Title. 17.03.040 Environmental Review All discretionary projects shall be reviewed for compliance or exemption with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The designated planning authority for the entitlement shall be responsible for taking action on the corresponding exemption or environmental review. Environmental review will be conducted pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines). If Title 14 of the California Code is amended, such amendments will govern City procedures. 17.03.050 Public Notice Unless otherwise specified, whenever the provisions of this Title require public notice, the City shall provide notice as required by this section and by the California Government Code. Page 743 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 18 of 95 A. Notification Method. Public Notice shall be provided a minimum of 10- days10 days, but no more than 45-days45 days, prior to the public hearing or to a Director’s decision. Permit Type Notice Type Notification Method Mailing Radius Websit e Site Postin g Newspape r Minor Exception Notice of Pending Action x Adjacent and Abutting1* Properties xYes None None Minor Use Permit Notice of Pending Action x 100’ Yesx None None Minor Precise Development Plan Notice of Pending Action 100’ Yes Yes No All Other Residential Projects Notice of Hearing x 300’ Yesx Yesx Yesx Commerci al Projects Notice of Hearing x 500’ Yesx Yesx Yesx General Plan or Zoning Code Text Amendment Notice of Hearing N/A Yes N/A Yes ⅛ page ad minimum size General Plan or Zoning Code Map Amendment Notice of Hearing 500’ Yes Yes Yes *(1). Adjacent and Abutting properties Shall include properties located across a street or alley. B. Mailed Notice. At least ten (10) days before the date of the public hearing or the date ofof the Director’s decisionaction when no public hearing is required, the Director (or the City Clerk for City Council Page 744 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 19 of 95 hearings) shall provide notice shall be provided by First-Class mail delivery to the following: 1. The applicant, the owner, and any occupant of the subject property; 2. The owner and occupants and tenants of all properties within the specific notification radius; and for the permit type or approval; 1. All neighborhood and community organizations that have previously filed a written request for notice of projects in the area where the site is located; 3. Any person or group who has filed a written request for notice regarding the specific application; 4. 5.4. School districts and any other local agency expected to provide essential facilities or services to the property which is the subject of the application, whose ability to provide those facilities and services may be affected; and 6.5. Blind, Aged, and Disabled Communities. Whenever a hearing is held regarding a permit for a drive-through facility, or modification of an existing drive-through facility permit, notice procedures shall incorporate the blind, aged, and disabled communities in order to facilitate their participation. C. Alternative Method for Large Mailings. If the number of owners persons to whom notice would be mailed or delivered is greater than 1,000, instead of a mailed notice, notice may be provided by providing notice by placing a display advertisement of at least one-eighth page in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the City and posted in three public locations at least 10 days prior to the hearing or the date of action when a public hearing is required. D. Newspaper Notice. At least ten (10) days before the date of the public hearing or the date of action when no public hearing is required, the City shall publish a notice in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the City. Page 745 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 20 of 95 E. Internet Notice. At least ten (10) days before the date of the public hearing or the date of the Director’s decisionaction when no public hearing is required, the Director (or the City Clerk for City Council hearings) the notice shall provide noticebe published on the City’s website. F. Site Posting. At least ten (10) days before the date of the public hearing a minimum of one public notice shall be posted on the project site in a conspicuous place along the property frontage abutting the public-right- of way. G. Amendments. Notwithstanding any other time limit set forth in this Chapter, any amendment or ordinance that affects the permitted use of real property, notice shall be published, posted, mailed, and delivered, or advertised, as applicable, at least 20 days before the hearing. G.H. Additional Notice. The Director may provide require additional notice of the hearing in a manner the Director deemsed appropriate. H.I. Content of Public Notice. The notice, at a minimum, shall include the following information: 1. The location of the real property, if any, that is the subject of the application; 2. Name of property owner(s), representative(s), and applicant. 3. A general description of the proposed project or action; 4. The City’s assigned file numbers to the application. 5. A statement indicating if the project is located within the Coastal Zone. 6. The date, time, location, review authority, and purpose of the public hearing or the date of action when no public hearing is required; Page 746 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 21 of 95 1. The identity of the review authority; 7. A statement indicating the level of environmental review that is applicable to the project and the location and times any environmental impact assessment prepared in connection with the application may be viewed by the public; 8. A statement that any interested person or authorized agent may appear and be heard; 9. A statement describing how to submit written comments; and 10. For matters which the Planning Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council, or when the Planning Commission’s decision is appealed to the City Council, the notice shall also include a summary of the Planning Commission’s action. City Council hearings, the Planning Commission recommendation. The omission of a component of the public notice content shall not automatically invalidate a public notice. I.J. Failure to Receive Mailed Notice. . The validity of the proceedings shall not be affected by the failure of any property owner, resident, or community organization to receive a mailedmailed notice. 17.03.060 Conduct of Public Hearings Whenever the provisions of this Title require a public hearing, the hearing shall be conducted in compliance with the requirements of State law as follows. A. Generally. Hearings shall be conducted pursuant to procedures adopted by the hearing body. B. Scheduling. Hearings before the City Council shall be scheduled by the City Clerk. All other hearings shall be scheduled by the Director of Community Development. C. Public Hearing Testimony. Any person may appear at a public hearing Page 747 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 22 of 95 and submit oral or written evidence, either individually or as a representative of a person or an organization. D. Time Limits. The City Council may establish time limits for individual testimony. E. Continuance of Public Hearing. The body conducting the public hearing may by motion continue the public hearing to a fixed date, time and place without additional hearing notice or may continue the item to an undetermined date with and providepublic notice of the continued hearing. F. Decision. The public hearing shall be closed before a vote is taken. 17.03.070 Findings and Notice of Action When deciding to approve, approve with conditions, modify, revoke, or deny any discretionary permit under this Title, the review authority shall issue a Notice of Action and make findings of fact as required by this Title. A. Findings. Findings, when required by State law or this Title, shall be based upon consideration of the application, plans, testimony, reports, and other materials that constitute the administrative record and shall be stated in writing in the resolution or record noticeof theof action on the permit. B. Date of Action. The review authority shall decide to approve, modify, revoke, or deny any discretionary permit following the closeclosure of the public hearing, or if no public hearing is required, within 30 days of the date the City has determined an application to be complete. C. Notice of Action. Upon approving, modifying, or denying a land use permit by the review authority, a notice of action shall be sent0issued.After the Director,Planning Commission, or City Council takes any action to approve, modify, or deny an application the Director, or City Clerk for City Council actions, shall issue a Notice of Action. The Notice shall describe the action taken, including any applicable conditions, and shall list the findings that were the basis for the decisions, and if . If the decision is subject to appeal. , the Notice of Action shall state this to the applicant. Page 748 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 23 of 95 1. Director’s Action. The Director shall mail the Notice to the applicant and to any other person or entity that has filed a written request for such notification with the Community Development Department within the 10five -days public notice of the decision being made. 1.2. Planning Commission Action. The Director shall mail a Notice of Action to the applicant and to any other person or entity that has filed a written request for such notification with the Community Development Department within five days of the Planning Commission action. Council Report of Planning Commission Action. Additionally, the City Council shall receive notification Ppursuant to Section 2.52.040, (City Council Review of Decisions of the Planning Commission), of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, all the Planning Commission actions shall be placed as a report item on the City Council’s agenda at the next regular City Council meeting following the Commission’s action. 2. Director’s Action. The Director shall mail the Notice to the applicant and to any other person or entity that has filed a written request for such notification with the Community Development Department within the 10-day public notice of the decision being made. The notice shall include information regarding the appeals process. 3. City Council Action. Within five days of City Council action, the City Clerk shall mail a Notice of Action to the applicant and to any other person or entity that has filed a written request for such notification with the Community Development Department. 17.03.080 Scope of Approval A. Scope. The scope of approvals includes only those uses and activities proposed in the application., . Unless otherwise specified, the approval of a new use shall terminate all rights and approvals for previous uses no longer occupying the same site or location. B. Conditions. The site plan, floor plans, building elevations, and/or any additional information or representation indicating the proposed structure or manner of operation submitted with an application or submitted during the approval process shall be deemed conditions of approval. Any approval may be subject to requirements that the applicant guarantees, warranties, or ensures compliance with submitted plans and conditions in Page 749 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 24 of 95 all respects. C. Actions Voiding Approval. If the construction of a building or structure or the use established is contrary to the description or illustration in the application, to either violate any provision of this Title or require additional permits, then the approval shall be deemed null and voidbe subject to the revocation as set forth in Section 17.03.110 Revocation of Permits. D. Periodic Review. All approvals may be subject to periodic review to determine compliance with the permit and applicable conditions. If a condition specifies that activities or uses allowed under the permit are subject to periodic reporting, monitoring, or assessments, it shall be the responsibility of the permit holder, the property owner, or successor property owners to comply with such conditions. 17.03.090 Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension A. Effective Dates. A decision shall be effective on the date of action except as provided below. No building permit or business license shall be issued until after the effective date. 1. City Council Decisions. All City Council actions shall become effective immediately, with the exception of Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map, and any new or amended Specific Plan, which . Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map shall take effect 30 days after the second reading of the ordinance, unless adopted by urgency in accordance with applicable law. 2. Planning Commission Decisions. All Planning Commission actions shall become effective 15 days after the decision unless following, whichever is later: a. The next regular City Council meeting following the Planning Commission’s action unless the City Council initiates review pursuant to Section 2.52.040, City Council Review of Decisions of the Planning Commission, of this code. the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Page 750 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 25 of 95 b. After the expiration of the 15-day appeal period following the date of action, unless an appeal is filed pursuant to Section TBD17.03.120., Appeals and Calls for Review. 3. Director Decisions Subject to Appeal. A Director’s decision on an application for any approval subject to appeal shall become effective after the expiration of the 15-day appeal period following the date of action, unless an appeal is filed pursuant to Section TBD17.03.120., Appeals and Calls for Review. B. Expiration. The review authority, in the granting of any permit, may specify a time, consistent with the purposes of the use and necessary to safeguard the public safety, health and welfare, within which the proposed use or development must be undertaken and actively and continuously pursued. If no time period is specified, any permit granted under this Title shall automatically expire when no project or use has been exercised or extended within two years after the date of the approval, except as provided below. 1. Extension for Permit Where a Coastal Development Permit is Required. The time limits for any permit for development that also requires a Coastal Development Permit shall be automatically extended to be the same as the term of such Coastal Development Permit. 2. Extension for Permit Granted in Conjunction with Tentative Map. The time limits for any permit granted in conjunction with an approved tentative tract map shall be automatically extended to be the same as the term of such tentative Tract Mmap. 3. Extensions for Permits Associated with Development Agreements. The time limits for any permit granted in conjunction with a Development Agreement shall be extended to the same as the term of such Development Agreement. 4. Other Extensions. The approving bodyDirector may approve a one- year extension of any permit or approval granted under this Title upon receipt of a written application with the required fee at least 30 days prior to the expiration date. Page 751 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 26 of 95 C. Exercise of Permit. An approval or permit for the use of a building or property shall be considered exercised when any of the following occurs: 1. Exercise of Planning Approval or Permit. An approval or permit for the use of a building or property is exercised when, if required, a A valid City business license has been issued, and the permitted use has commenced on the site. 2. Exercise of Building Permit. A permit for the construction of a building or structure is exercised when a valid City building permit, if required, is issued, and construction has lawfully commenced and is. diligently pursued to completion. 17.03.100 Minor Modifications and Amendments No revision in the use or structure for which a permit or other approval has been issued is permitted unless the permit is revised as follows: provided for in this Title, with the exception of Minor Modifications pursuant to xyz. A. Minor Modifications. The Community Development Director may approve minor revisions to approved plans and permits, excluding late-night establishments and outdoor uses, when it can be found that the modification is consistent with the original application findings, environmental analysis, and conditions approved by the original Review Authority. The modifications may not substantially expand or intensify the use or approved floor area by an a cumulative amount greater than ten percent or 1,500 square feet, whichever is less. B. Amendment. Any revision, modification, or amendment to a permit, which does not meet the qualifications for a Minor Meodification set forth in subsection A, for a use or structure may be modified by the original approval authority for said use or structure. The manner in which the revision, modification, or amendment shall be considered shall be the same in which a new permit for a use or structure would be considered. 17.03.110 Revocation of Permits Any permit granted under this Title may be revoked or revised for cause if any of the conditions or terms of the permit are violated or if any law or ordinance is violated. Page 752 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 27 of 95 A. Initiation of Proceeding. Revocation proceedings may be initiated by the City Council, Planning Commission, or Director. B. Public Notice, Hearings, and Action. After conducting a duly-noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission shall act on the proposed revocation, pursuant to Chapter TBD, Public Notice17.03.050. C. Required Findings. The Planning Commission may revoke or modify the permit if it makes any of the following findings: 1. That the approval was obtained by fraud or material misrepresentation that vitiates one of the required findings of the permit; 2. That the use or activity for which such approval was granted has permanently ceased to exist as evidenced by demolition, alteration, subsequent use of the space, or similar conditions; 3. That the use or activity for which such approval was granted has been suspended or dormant for longer than 12 consecutive months, as demonstrated by any form of evidence or documentation. 4. That the permit or variance granted is being, or recently has been, exercised contrary to the terms or conditions of such approval, or in violation of any statute, ordinance, law or regulation; 5. That the use for which the approval was granted was or is so exercised as to be detrimental to the public health or safety, or so as to constitute a nuisance; 6. That the circumstances under which the permit was granted have been changed by the owner or operator to such a degree that one or more of the findings contained in the permit is no longer valid and the public health, safety, and welfare merit revocation of the permit; or 7. That the conditions of approval are found to be inadequate to mitigate the impacts of the use allowed by the permit, and the Page 753 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 28 of 95 public health, safety and welfare merit modification of the permit. For a restaurant with on-sale alcoholic beverages, the business is not operating as a restaurant because the primary function of the operation is the sale or offering for sale of alcoholic beverages and not the sale or offering for sale of food. A food to alcohol sales ratio provides a quantitative tool to help evaluate whether the business is operating as a restaurant whose primary function is the sale or offering for sale of food, as opposed to a business whose primary purpose is the sale of alcoholic beverages. For purposes of determining whether this finding can be made, an on-sale restaurant that maintains a minimum of 50 percent of the total gross sales, computed monthly, from the sale of prepared food is presumed to be a restaurant. An on-sale restaurant that does not meet these percentages has the burden of demonstrating that it operates as a restaurant, as that term is defined in Section TBD, Commercial Uses. Refusal to provide the information requested under this subsection within 60 days shall be deemed prima facie evidence that the business is not operating as a restaurant. B. Notice of Action. Following Planning Commission action to revoke or modify a permit, the Director shall issue a Notice of Action within five business days. The Notice shall describe the Commission’s action with its findings. The Director shall mail notice to the permit holder and to any person or entity who requested the revocation proceeding. 17.03.120 Appeals and Calls for Review A. City Council Calls for Review. Two members of the City Council may initiate review of all any actions of the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 2.52.040 of this Code, City Council Review of Decisions of the Planning Commission. B. Appeals. 1. Applicability. Any action by the Director or Planning Commission in the administration or enforcement of the provisions of this Title may be appealed in accordance with this Section. a. Appeals of Director Decisions. Decisions of the Director may be appealed to the Planning Commission by filing a written appeal with the Community Development Department. The Page 754 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 29 of 95 Planning Commission’s decision is final and may not be appealed to City Council. b. Appeals of Planning Commission Decisions. Decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing a written appeal with the City Clerk. The City Council’s decision is final. a. Appeal of Planning Commission Recommendations. Recommendations of the Planning Commission may not be appealed. 2. Rights of Appeal. Appeals may be filed by the applicant, by the owner of property, or by any other person aggrieved by a decision that is subject to appeal under the provisions of this Ordinance. 3. Time Limits. Unless otherwise specified in State or Federal law, an aggrieved member of the public, including the applicant, may file an appeal in writing fifteen (15) calendar days following the date which the action was taken. However, the City Council may call up a Planning Commission decision within the 15-day period in accordance with Section 2.52.040. In the event an appeal period ends on a day the City is closed, the appeal period shall end at the close of business on the next consecutive business day. 4. Procedures. a. Filing. The appeal shall identify the decision being appealed and shall clearly and concisely state the reasons for the appeal. The appeal shall be accompanied by the required fee. b. Proceedings Stayed by Appeal. The timely filing of an appeal shall stay all proceedings in the matter appealed including, but not limited to, the issuance of City building permits and business licenses. c. Transmission of Record. The Director, or in the case of appeals to the City Council, City Clerk, shall schedule the appeal for consideration by the authorized hearing body within 60 days of the date that a complete appeal Page 755 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 30 of 95 application is filed. The Director shall forward the appeal, the Notice of Action, and all other documents that constitute the record to the hearing body. The Director shall also prepare a staff report that responds to the issues raised by the appeal and may include a recommendation for action. 5. Standards of Review. When reviewing any decision on appeal, the appeal body shall use the same standards for decision-making required for the original decision. The appeal body may revise or adopt the same decision and findings as were originally approved; it also may request or require changes to the application as a condition of approval. 6. Public Notice and Hearing. Public notice shall be provided, and the hearing conducted by the applicable appeal body pursuant to Section TBD17.03.050, Public Notice. Notice of the hearing shall also be given to the applicant and party filing the appeal and any other interested person who has filed with the City Clerk a written request for such notice. In the case of an appeal of a Planning Commission decision, notice of such appeal shall also be given to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may be represented at the hearing. 7. Action. An action to grant an appeal shall require a majority vote of the hearing body members. A tie vote shall have the effect of rejecting the appeal. 17.03.130 Zoning Determination and Similar Use Determinations Requests for determinations of this Title and verifications relating to prior approvals or permits may be made to the Director. Requests shall be in writing. B.A. Zoning Determination. A request for an interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance may be made for provisions that are unclear. 1. Community Development Director Interpretations: a. Director’s Administrative Zoning Determination. As part of the director’s administrative authority, the Director my initiate a code interpretation whenever necessary to clarify Page 756 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 31 of 95 a conflicting provision or procedure of the code. b. Director’s Formal Zoning Determination. The Director may respond to formal inquiries regarding code provisions. The interpretation shall be in writing and will be made available by the Community Development Department pursuant to this section. Formal Director’s Interpretations are binding and may be appealed pursuant to Chapter 17.03.050. A fee for a formal interpretation shall be assessed in accordance with City’s Fee Schedule. 2. Procedures. The Community Development Director shall file a formal Zoning Determination with the Planning Commission within 60-days of the determination. Following the acceptance of the determination the Community Development Director shall: a. Publish the determination to the City’s website; and b. Update the Zone Code to reflect the determination within a reasonable timeframe. C.B. Similar Use Determination. A request for a Similar Use Determination may be made for a use not listed in the Zone. 1. Findings. The Community Development Director may find a use that is not listed in the zone is allowed provided the following findings can affirmatively be made: a. The characteristics of, and activities associated with, the proposed use are not more intense than those uses listed in the zoning district as allowable, and will not involve a greater level of activity, population density, intensity, traffic generation, parking, dust, odor, noise, or similar impacts than comparable uses in the zone; b. The proposed use will meet the purpose of the zone that is applied to the location of the use; c. The proposed use will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, or any Page 757 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 32 of 95 applicable Specific Plan; and d. The proposed use is not specifically prohibited. 2. Procedures. The Community Development Director shall file the use determination findings with the Planning Commission within 60-days of the determination. Following the acceptance of the determination the Community Development Director shall: a. Publish the determination to the city’s website; and b. Update the Zone Code to reflect the determination within a reasonable timeframe. 17.03.140 Chapter 17.07 Housing Accessibility - Reasonable Accommodation for Disability A. 17.07.010 Purpose and Applicability. In compliance with Federal and State fair housing laws, it is the purpose of this section to provide reasonable accommodations in the City’s zoning and land use regulations, policies, and practices when needed to provide an individual with any disability an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. A. This section provides a procedure to request reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities seeking equal access to housing under the Fair Housing Laws in the application of zoning laws, building codes, and other land use regulations, policies and procedures. Fair Housing Laws means "Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988" (42 U.S.C. Section 3601, et seq.), including reasonable accommodation required by 42 U.S.C. Section 3604(f)(3)(B), and the "California Fair Employment and Housing Act" (California Government Code Section 12900, et seq.), including reasonable accommodation required specifically by California Government Code Sections 12927(c)(1) and 12955(l), as any of these statutory provisions now exist or may be amended from time to time. B. C. A request for reasonable accommodation may be made by any person with a disability, his/her representative, or any business or property owner when the application of a zoning law, building code provision or other land use regulation, policy or practice acts as a barrier to fair housing opportunities. A person with a disability is a person who has Page 758 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 33 of 95 a physical or mental impairment that limits or substantially limits one or more major life activities, anyone who is regarded as having such impairment or anyone who has a record of such impairment, as those terms are defined in the Fair Housing Laws. D. E. A request for reasonable accommodation may include a modification or exception to the rules, standards and practices for the siting, development and use of housing or housing related facilities that would eliminate regulatory barriers and provide a person with a disability equal opportunity to housing of their choice. Requests for reasonable accommodation shall be made in the manner prescribed by this section. F. G. It is the intent of this section that, notwithstanding time limits provided to perform specific functions, application review, decision making and appeals proceed expeditiously, especially where the request is time sensitive, and so as to reduce impediments to equal access to housing. B. Notice to the Public of Availability of Accommodation Process. The City shall prominently display in the public areas of the Community Development Department at City Hall a notice advising those with disabilities or their representatives that they may request a reasonable accommodation in accordance with the procedures established in this section. City employees shall direct individuals to the display whenever they are requested to do so or reasonably believe that individuals with disabilities or their representatives may be entitled to a reasonable accommodation. H.C. Application Submittal. Any person with a disability may request a reasonable accommodation on a form supplied by the community Community development Development department Department.including the following information, accompanied by a fee established by resolution of the city council: 1. The applicant’s or representative’s name, mailing address and daytime phone number; 2. The address of the property for which the request is being made; 3. The specific code section, regulation, procedure or policy of the City from which relief is sought; 4. A site plan or illustrative drawing showing the proposed accommodation; 5. An explanation of why the specified code section, regulation, procedure or policy is preventing, or will prevent, the applicant’s use and enjoyment of the subject property; Page 759 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 34 of 95 6. The basis for the claim that the Fair Housing Laws apply to the individual(s) and evidence satisfactory to the City supporting the claim, which may include a letter from a medical doctor or other licensed health care professional, a disabled license, or any other appropriate evidence; 7. A detailed explanation of why the accommodation is reasonable and necessary to afford the applicant an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling in the City; 8. Verification by the applicant that the property is the primary residence of the person(s) for whom reasonable accommodation is requested; and 9. Any other information required to make the findings required by subsection (D) of this section consistent with the Fair Housing Laws. 1. Timing. A request for reasonable accommodation may be filed at any time that the accommodation may be necessary to ensure equal access to housing. 2. Obligations. A reasonable accommodation does not affect or negate an individual’s obligations to comply with other applicable regulations not at issue in the requested accommodation. 3. Assistance. If an individual needs assistance in making the request for reasonable accommodation, the City shall provide assistance to ensure that the process is accessible. 4. Concurrent Filing. Should the request for reasonable accommodation be made concurrently with a discretionary permit, then the fee for a reasonable accommodation application may be waived provided that the prescribed fee shall be paid for all other discretionary permits. I.D. Reviewing Authority. Applications for reasonable accommodation shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director or their designee. 1. Applications for reasonable accommodation shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director or designee. J.E. Findings. The reviewing authority shall approve the request for a reasonable accommodation if, based upon all of the evidence presented, the following findings can be made: Page 760 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 35 of 95 1. The housing, which is the subject of the request for reasonable accommodation, will be occupied by an individual with disabilities protected under Fair Housing Laws; 2. The requested accommodation is reasonable and necessary to make housing available to an individual with disabilities protected under the Fair Housing Laws; 3. The requested accommodation will not impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the City, as defined in the Fair Housing Laws and interpretive case law; and 4. The requested accommodation will not require a fundamental alteration in the nature of the City’s zoning or building laws, policies and/or procedures, as defined in the Fair Housing Laws and interpretive case law. The City may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors in determining whether the requested accommodation would require a fundamental alteration in the nature of the City’s zoning or building program: a. Whether the requested accommodation would introduce uses not otherwise permitted in the neighborhood; and b. Whether granting the requested accommodation would substantially undermine any express purpose of either the City’s General Plan or an applicable Specific Plan. K.F. Decision. 1. The review authority shall consider an application and issue a written determination within forty (40) calendar days of the date of receipt of a completed application. 2. If necessary to reach a determination on any request for reasonable accommodation, the review authority may request further information from the applicant consistent with this section, specifying in detail what information is required. In the event a request for further information is made, the applicable time period to issue a written determination shall be stayed until the applicant reasonably responds to the request. Page 761 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 36 of 95 3. The review authority’s written decision shall set forth the findings, any conditions of approval, notice of the right to appeal, and the right to request reasonable accommodation on the appeals process, if necessary. The decision shall be mailed to the applicant. 4. The reasonable accommodation shall be subject to any reasonable conditions imposed on the approval that are consistent with the purposes of this section. 5. In making the approval findings in subsection (D) of this section, the review authority may approve alternative reasonable accommodations that provide an equivalent level of benefit to the applicant. 6. The written decision of the reviewing authority shall be final unless appealed in the manner set forth below. 7. While a request for reasonable accommodation is pending, all laws and regulations otherwise applicable to the property that is the subject of the request shall remain in full force and effect. 8. Where the improvements or modifications approved through a reasonable accommodation would generally require a variance, a variance shall not be required. 9. The applicant may request additional time beyond that provided for in this section or may request a continuance regarding any decision or consideration by the City of a pending appeal. Extensions of time sought by applicants shall not be considered delay on the part of the City, shall not constitute failure by the City to provide for prompt decisions on applications and shall not be a violation of any required time period set forth in this section. L.G. Appeals. An appeal of the Director’s decision may only be filed by the applicant of the reasonable accommodation request. Appeals shall be processed pursuant to 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). G. The decision on a reasonable accommodation may be appealed to the City Council within ten (10) calendar days of the issuance of a written decision. Page 762 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 37 of 95 D. The appeal shall be made in writing including a statement of the grounds for appeal and accompanied by a fee established by resolution of the City Council. 4. The City Council shall hear the matter and render a determination as soon as reasonably practicable, but in no event later than sixty (60) calendar days after an appeal has been filed. All determinations shall address and be based upon the same findings required to be made in the original determination from which the appeal is taken. E. The City shall provide notice of an appeal hearing to the applicant. The Council shall announce its findings within forty (40) calendar days of the hearing, unless good cause is found for an extension, and the decision shall be mailed to the applicant. The council’s action shall be final. C. If an individual needs assistance in filing an appeal on an adverse decision, the City shall provide assistance to ensure that the appeals process is accessible. M. Waiver of Time Periods. Notwithstanding any provisions in this section regarding the occurrence of any action within a specified period of time, the applicant may request additional time beyond that provided for in this section or may request a continuance regarding any decision or consideration by the City of a pending appeal. Extensions of time sought by applicants shall not be considered delay on the part of the City, shall not constitute failure by the City to provide for prompt decisions on applications and shall not be a violation of any required time period set forth in this section. N.A. Notice to the Public of Availability of Accommodation Process. The City shall prominently display in the public areas of the Community Development Department at City Hall a notice advising those with disabilities or their representatives that they may request a reasonable accommodation in accordance with the procedures established in this section. City employees shall direct individuals to the display whenever they are requested to do so or reasonably believe that individuals with disabilities or their representatives may be entitled to a reasonable accommodation. O.H. Expiration, Extensions, and Revocations. 1. Expiration and Extensions. Approved reasonable accommodations Page 763 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 38 of 95 may expire or be extended pursuant to 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). 2. Revocation. Reasonable accommodations that have been previously approved, may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). , Time Extension, Violation, Discontinuance, and Revocation. A. Any reasonable accommodation approved in accordance with the terms of this section shall expire within twenty-four (24) months from the effective date of approval or at an alternative time specified as a condition of approval unless: A. A building permit has been issued and construction has commenced; P. A certificate of occupancy has been issued; 4. The use is established; or 5. A time extension has been granted. c. The Community Development Director may approve a time extension for a reasonable accommodation for good cause for a period or periods not to exceed three (3) years. An application for a time extension shall be made in writing to the Community Development Department no less than thirty (30) days or more than ninety (90) days prior to the expiration date. 10. Notice of the Director’s Decision on a time extension shall be provided as specified in subsection (E)(3) of this section. 3. Any reasonable accommodation approved in accordance with the terms of this code may be revoked if any of the conditions or terms of such reasonable accommodation are violated, or if any law or ordinance is violated in connection therewith.  An accommodation is granted to an individual and shall not run with the land unless the Director finds that the modification is physically integrated on the property and cannot feasibly be removed or altered. Any change in use or circumstances that negates the basis for the granting of the approval may render the reasonable accommodation null and void and/or revocable by the City, and thereafter the reasonable accommodation may be Page 764 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 39 of 95 required to be removed or substantially conformed to the code if reasonably feasible. 1. Amendments. A request for changes in conditions of approval of a reasonable accommodation, or a change to plans that would affect a condition of approval shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.100 (Minor Modifications and Amendments). treated as a new application and shall be processed in accordance with the requirements of this section. The Community Development Director may waive the requirement for a new application and approve the changes if the changes are minor, do not involve substantial alterations or addition to the plan or the conditions of approval, and are consistent with the intent of the original approval. Page 765 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 40 of 95 EXHIBIT D CHAPTER 17.04 – DEFINITIONS Section 17.04.040 (General definitions) of Chapter 17.04 (Definitions) of Title 17 (zoning) is hereby amended to include the following definitions in alphabetical order. Unless modified herein, all other definitions shall remain as currently written. Section 17.04.040 – General Definitions Aggrieved Person “Aggrieved person”means any person who, in person or through a representative, appeared at a public hearing or responded to a public notice, in connection with a city decision or action, or who, by other appropriate means before a hearing, decision or action by the review authority made their concern known or who for good cause was unable to do either. Building Official means the Building Official of the City of Hermosa Beach. Director means the same as “Director of community development”. Ministerial Review means an action process that requires a review of objective criteria established in the code and requires no personal judgment. Page 766 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 41 of 95 EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT E CHAPTER 17.60 – ZONING CLEARANCE Chapter 17.60 (Determination of Legality of Nonconforming Residential Buildings) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.60 (Zoning Clearance) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.6004 Zoning Clearance 17.0460.010 Purpose. The purpose of a Zoning Clearance is to ensure that a proposed use, structure, or matter requiring ministerial review complies with the standards, limitations, and other applicable regulations of the Title. 17.0460.020 Applicability A Zoning Clearance is required for any proposed construction or the establishment of a use requiring a ministerial review – as specified in this Title. 17.0460.030 Review Authority The Community Development Department Director or their designee may grant a Zoning Clearance when required by this Title. 17.0460.040 Procedures. A. Application. Applications for Zoning Clearance shall be filed with the Community Development Department on the prescribed application forms prescribed by the Director. pursuant to Section TBD “Application Forms and Fees” and Section TBD "Review of Applications.” Zoning clearance applications for proposed uses or structures may be processed independent of or concurrently with other applications as determined by the Community Development Director. B. Processing. Applications for Zoning Clearances shall be processed in a timely manner with a decision rendered no more than 15-days from receipt of a complete application. Commented [HB5]: A Zoning Clearance is a ministerial review to allow the City staff the ability to make sure new uses and buildings comply with the City’s codes. Edits improve the readability and remove duplicate requirements. Page 767 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 42 of 95 1. Notwithstanding above, permits for accessory dwelling units and /or junior accessory dwelling units shall be decided within 60-dayone hundred twenty (120) days of receipt of a complete application and subject to the provisions outlined in Chapter TBD.17.21. C. Report of Decision and Findings. Action by the Director shall be made pursuant to Section 17.03.070 (Findings and Notice of Action). Approval will be based upon determining the request complies with the standards, limitations and other regulations in the governing section, which may include the imposition of conditions and limitations to ensure the permit is consistent with said requirements and protects the public health, safety and welfare; otherwise, the Director shall deny the application and provide the applicant a written statement of the reasons the permit cannot be issued. The applicant shall be advised in writing of the right to appeal the Director’s Decision pursuant to Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. 17.0460.050 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation A. Appeals. Appeals of Ministerial or non-discretionary Zoning Clearance may only be filed if the Zoning Clearance is denied are not eligible for appeal except where required by state law, and in such case shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Zoning Clearance may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Zoning Clearance shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). D. Appeals. Ministerial or non-discretionary Zoning Clearances are not eligible for appeal, unless otherwise provided below or when required by state law 1. Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit pursuant to HBMC Section 17.21.050. Revocation. Any Zoning Clearance may be revoked by the Director or the review authority body for any of the following causes: That any term or condition has not been complied with; Page 768 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 43 of 95 1. That the property for which the Zoning Clearance was granted is used or maintained in violation of any statute, law, regulation, condition of approval or this Title; 2. That the use for which the Zoning Clearance was granted has not operated for at least twelve (12) consecutive months, or has ceased to exist, or has been abandoned; 3. That the use for which the Zoning Clearance was granted is deemed detrimental to the public health or safety or constitutes a nuisance. E. Expiration. A Zoning Clearance shall expire at the conclusion of the permitted use or activity, not to exceed one year from the effective date if no expiration or term is stated therein, and the property shall thereafter be used in compliance with the provisions of this Title and Code. Page 769 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 44 of 95 EXHIBIT F CHAPTER 17.62 – ADMINISTRATIVE PERMITS Chapter 17.62 (Planning Commission Authority – Building Code) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.62 (Administrative Permit) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.05 62 Administrative Permit 17.0562.010 Purpose The purpose of an Administrative Permit is to ensure that a proposed use or matter for which an Administrative Permit is required complies with the standards, limitations and other regulations applicable to the subject use or matter. 17.0562.020 Applicability Approval of an Administrative Permit is required for uses or developments specifically identified in any section of this Title. 17.0562.030 Review Authority The Community Development Department Director of their designee may grant Administrative Permits for all such uses and matters required by this Title to be reviewed and allowed only upon the granting of an Administrative Permit. 17.0562.040 Procedures A. Application Filing. Applications for Administrative Permits shall be filed with the Community Development Department on the forms prescribed by the Community Development Director. Pursuant to Section 17.03.020 (Application Forms and Fees) and Section17.03.030 (Review of Applications). The application for an Administrative Permit shall include data or other evidence in support of the applicable findings required by Section 17.62.050 (Required Findings).Applications for Administrative Permits shall be filed with the Community Development Department on the prescribed application forms prescribed application forms by the Community Development Director.pursuant to Section TBD “Application Forms and Fees” and Section TBD Review of Applications. The application for an Administrative Permit shall include data or other evidence in Commented [HB6]: Administrative Permits are less likely to impact the neighbors and do not require a public hearing. Some types of Administrative Permits would still require a public notice to be sent to inform the neighbors. Administrative Permits include: approvals for Emergency Shelters Entertainment, Limited Live Limited Outdoor Seating Low Barrier Navigation Centers Residential Care Facility Short Term Vacation Rental Supportive Housing (up to 50 units) Temporary Use and Temporary Event Edits improve the readability and remove duplicate requirements Page 770 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 45 of 95 support of the applicable findings required by Section TBD, Required Findings. B. Report of Decisions and Findings. Approval will be based upon determining the request complies with applicable standards and regulations may include conditions necessary to protect public, health, safety, and welfare.Action by the Director shall be made pursuant to Section 17.03.070 (Findings and Notice of Action).Except as set forth below, the Community Development Director shall issue the Administrative Permit no more than thirty (30) days following the filing of a complete application therefor. Approval will be based upon determining the request complies with the standards, limitations and other regulations in the governing section, which may include the imposition of conditions and limitations to ensure the permit is consistent with said requirements and protects the public health, safety and welfare; otherwise, the Director shall deny the application and provide the applicant a written statement of the reasons the permit cannot be issued. The applicant shall be advised in writing of the right to appeal the Director’s Decision pursuant to Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. 17.0562.050 Required Findings The Director or their designee must shall make all of the following findings to approve or conditionally approve an Administrative Permit application. The inability to make one or more of the findings is grounds for denial of an application. Written findings shall be prepared when a denial decision is rendered. A. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone with Administrative Permit approval, and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Ordinance and the Municipal Code; B. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; C. The site is physically adequate for the type, density, and intensity (e.g., number of employees and customers) of use being proposed, including provision of services (e.g., sanitation and water), public access, and the absence of physical constraints; Page 771 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 46 of 95 D. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses on site and in the vicinity of the subject property; and E. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the proposed use at the location proposed will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a menace to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed use. 17.0562.060 Conditions of Approval The Community Development Director may impose reasonable conditions deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the findings for an Administrative Permit listed in Section TBD, Required Finding. 17.0562.070 Appeals, Expiration, Revocation, etc. A. Appeals. Appeals of Administrative Permits shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Administrative Permits may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Administrative Permits shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). D. Effective Date – Appeals. Decisions of the Community Development Director may be appealed to the Planning Commission by filing an appeal within fifteen (15) days of the Director’s decision; provided, that upon affixing the signature of the applicant to an issued permit, the permit shall become effective and the right to appeal shall be waived. Appeals shall be filed in writing with the Community Development Department accompanied by a fee set by resolution of the City Council. Notice of hearing shall be given to the applicant at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, unless the applicant agrees to waive the requirement so that the matter may be heard at an earlier time. The Commission’s review shall be limited to a determination of whether the application complies with the requirements of the governing section. The filing of an appeal within such time shall stay the effective date of the decision until the Commission has Page 772 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 47 of 95 acted on the appeal. The Commission’s decision shall be final and conclusive, unless the governing section specifically provides for a direct or subsequent appeal to the City Council. E. F. Appeals to the City Council shall be filed with the City Clerk accompanied by a fee set by resolution of the City Council. The filing of an appeal within ten (10) days shall stay the effective date of the decision until the council has acted on the appeal as hereinafter set forth in this Title. Upon receipt of a written appeal, the Planning Commission shall transmit to the Council the Planning Commission’s complete record of the case. Notice of hearing shall be given to the applicant at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, unless the applicant agrees to waive the requirement so that the matter may be heard at an earlier time. The Council shall hear the matter and render a determination as soon as reasonably practicable, but in no event later than sixty (60) days after an appeal has been filed unless requested by the applicant. The Council’s review shall be limited to a determination of whether the application complies with the requirements of the governing section. The council shall announce its findings within forty (40) calendar days of the hearing, unless good cause is found for an extension, and the decision shall be mailed to the applicant. The council’s decision shall be final and conclusive. A. Revocation. Any Administrative Permit may be revoked by the Director or the decision-making body for any of the following causes: H. That any term or condition has not been complied with; I. That the property for which the Administrative Permit has been granted is used or maintained in violation of any statute, law, regulation or condition of approval; J. That the use for which the Administrative Permit was granted has not been exercised for at least twelve (12) consecutive months, or has ceased to exist, or has been abandoned; K. The Administrative Permit has been issued for a short-term vacation rental, which has received three (3) affirmed violations of the ordinance codified in this section or any of the City’s quality of life ordinances, such as noise violations, disturbing the peace, or creating a public nuisance, within a 12-month period; or, Page 773 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 48 of 95 L. That the use for which the Administrative Permit was granted has been so exercised as to be detrimental to the public health or safety or so as to constitute a nuisance. A hearing to show cause why the permit should not be revoked shall be held by the issuing body prior to the revocation of any administrative permit. Written notice shall be provided the permit holder at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing stating the reasons therefor. B. Expiration. An Administrative Permit shall expire at the conclusion of the permitted use or activity, not to exceed one year from the effective date if no expiration or term is stated therein, and the property shall thereafter be used in compliance with the provisions of this Title and Code. Chapter 17.06 Temporary Use Permits 17.06.010 Purpose This Chapter establishes a process for review and approval of uses that are intended to be of limited duration of time and will not permanently alter the character or physical facilities of the site where they occur. 17.06.020 Applicability Approval of a Temporary Use Permit is required for uses or developments specifically identified in any section of this Title which requires a Temporary Use Permit. 17.06.030 Review Authority The Community Development Director shall act as the review authority for Temporary Use Permits based on consideration of the requirements of this Chapter and Section TBD, Temporary Uses. 17.06.040 Procedures 1. Application. An application for a Temporary Use Permit shall be submitted at least 30 days before the use is intended to begin with the Community Development Department on the prescribed application forms pursuant to Section TBD, Application Forms and Fees and Section TBD, Review of Applications. The application for a Temporary Use Permit shall include data or other evidence in support of the applicable findings required by Section TBD, Required Findings. Commented [HB7]: Temporary Use Permits were proposed as a distinctive, standalone chapter when the Planning Commission reviewed the amendment. In order to streamline the review process, they have been incorporated into the Administrative Permit process. The deleted text is shown here to memorialize the change. Page 774 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 49 of 95 2. Report of Decision and Findings. Except as set forth below, the Community Development Director shall issue the Temporary Use Permit no more than thirty (30) days following the filing of a complete application therefor. Approval will be based upon determining the request complies with the standards, limitations and other regulations in the governing section, which may include the imposition of conditions and limitations to ensure the permit is consistent with said requirements and protects the public health, safety and welfare; otherwise, the Director shall deny the application and provide the applicant a written statement of the reasons the permit cannot be issued. The applicant shall be advised in writing of the right to appeal the Director’s decision pursuant to Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. 17.06.050 Required Findings The Community Development Director must make both of the following findings to approve or conditionally approve a Temporary Use Permit application. The inability to make one or more of the findings is grounds for denial of an application. 1. The proposed use will not unreasonably affect adjacent properties, their owners and occupants, or the surrounding neighborhood, and will not in any other way constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the area of such use or to the general welfare of the City; and 2. The proposed use will not unreasonably interfere with pedestrian or vehicular traffic or circulation in the area surrounding the proposed use and will not create a demand for additional parking that cannot be safely and efficiently accommodated by existing parking areas. 17.06.060 Conditions of Approval The Community Development Director may impose reasonable conditions deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the findings for a Temporary Use Permit listed in Section TBD, Required Findings, including the items below. 1. Provision of a certificate of insurance acceptable to the City’s risk manager. 2. Submission of a performance bond or other surety devices, if necessary, to ensure that any temporary facilities or structures used will be removed from the site within a reasonable time following the event and that the property will be restored to its former condition, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 3. Prior to the event, the applicant shall provide a statement to the City stating that the organizers of the event agree to indemnify, hold harmless, and Page 775 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 50 of 95 defend the City, its officers, agents and employees from any and all liability or claims that may be brought against the City arising out of its approval of the Temporary Use Permit, or arising out of the operation of the use or uses allowed under the permit, save and except that caused solely by the City’s active negligence. 4. Each site occupied by a temporary use shall be cleaned of debris, litter, or other evidence of the temporary activity on completion or removal of the activity, and shall thereafter be used in compliance with the provisions of this Title. 5. Other conditions determined by the Community Development Director to ensure the operation of the proposed temporary use in a compatible, efficient, harmonious, nuisance-free, orderly, and safe, manner, including, but not limited to the following: 1. Regulation of ingress, egress, and traffic circulation. 2. Regulation of fire protection and access for fire vehicles. 3. Regulation of lighting and signage. 4. Regulation of hours of operation, staffing, or other aspects of the use. 5. Provisions for sanitary facilities and waste collection and disposal. 6. Safety and security measures. 7. Measures for removal of the activity and site restoration, to ensure that no changes to the site would limit the range of possible future land uses otherwise allowed by this Title. 17.06.070 Appeals, Expiration, Revocation, etc. 1. Appeals. Temporary Use Permit decisions are subject to the appeal provisions of Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. 2. Expiration, Extensions and Revisions. Temporary Use Permit approval is effective and may only be extended or revised as provided for in Chapter TBD, Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension. 3. Revocation. Temporary Use Permit approval may be revoked pursuant to Section TBD, Revocation, if any of the conditions or terms of the approval are violated or if any law or ordinance is violated. Page 776 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 51 of 95 EXHIBIT G CHAPTER 17.66 – MINOR EXCEPTION Chapter 17.66 (Amendments) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.66 (Minor Exception) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.08 66 Minor Exception 17.0866.010 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to establish a means of granting minor relief from locational, developmental, and operational development standards. where doing so would be consistent with this Title and the General Plan, and where it is not possible or practical to approve a Variance. 17.0866.020 Applicability Section Reserved.The following changes to development standards may be approved through a Minor Exception. A. Up to ten percent reductions in setback and open space requirements for existing buildings; B. Projections where existing setbacks conform except for projections at local points in the building walls, such as for bay windows when the length parallel to the wall of any such projection is no greater than eight feet, or when the existing projecting element is no closer than three feet from the property line and no greater than one-quarter of the total length of the wall from which it projects; C. Eaves, to match the existing eave projection when adding to an existing building, and when the new eave will also conform to the requirements of the California Building Code; D. The enlargement of windows in nonconforming buildings, and other minor structural alterations in nonconforming buildings, provided there is no increase in total floor area; E. Up to a ten percent reduction in parking stall dimensions for structural reasons, when providing parking in existing buildings; Commented [HB8]: A Minor Exception is a small deviation from a development standard. Edits improve the readability, remove duplicate requirements, and incorporate applicability of standards that may be waived from Section 17.54.030 (Scope of Administrative Variances) Page 777 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 52 of 95 F. Arbors or trellises in rear yards, for privacy, when the grade of the adjacent property is higher than that of the subject property. Sides and tops of arbors and trellises are to be made only of framework or latticework, and must be at least fifty (50) percent open. 17.0866.030 Review Authority The Community Development Director shall act as the review authority for Minor Exceptions. However, the Director may refer any application for a Minor Exception for a project that may generate substantial public controversy or involve significant land use policy decisions to the Planning Commission for decision. A. Concurrent Processing. If a request for a Minor Exception is being submitted in conjunction with an application for another approval, permit, or entitlement that requires Planning Commission action, it shall be heard and acted upon at the same time and in the same manner as that application. 17.0866.040 Procedures A. Application. An application for a Minor Exception shall be filed to the Community Development Department on the prescribed application forms prescribed by the Director. pursuant to Section TBD, Application Forms and Fees and Section TBD, Review of Applications. The application for a Minor Exception shall include data or other evidence in support of the applicable findings required by Section TBD, Required Findings. B. Public Notice. An application for a Minor Exception shall require a public notice prior to the Director’s decision pursuant to Section, TBD 17.03.050 (Public Notice). C. Report of Decisions and Findings. Except as set forth below, the Community Development Director shall issue the Minor Exception no more than thirty (30) days following the filing of a complete application. therefor. Approval will be based upon determining the request complies with the standards, limitations and other regulations in the governing section, which may include the imposition of conditions and limitations to ensure the permit is consistent with said requirements and protects the public health, safety and welfare; otherwise, the Director shall deny the Page 778 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 53 of 95 application and provide the applicant a 53riten statement of the reasons the permit cannot be issued. The applicant shall be advised in writing of the right to appeal the Director’s Decision pursuant to Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. 17.0866.050 Required Findings The Community Development Director must shall make all of the following findings to approve or conditionally approve a minor exception application. The inability to make one or more of the findings is grounds for denial of an application. 1. The requested minor exception is warranted by practical difficulties; 1. The requested minor exception is warranted by an unnecessary hardship; 2. The requested minor exception is necessary to avoid inconsistencies with the general intent of this Title; andor 3. The requested minor exception for the same development standard has not been approved within the last 10 years. 17.0866.060 Conditions of Approval In approving a Minor Exception, the review authority may impose reasonable conditions or restrictions and/or require reasonable guarantees and evidence that such conditions are being, or will be, complied with, to achieve the findings for a Minor Exception. 17.0866.070 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation A. Appeals. Appeals of Minor Exceptions shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Minor Exception may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). Page 779 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 54 of 95 C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Minor Exception shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). 3. Appeals. Minor Exception decisions are subject to the appeal provisions of Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. 4. Expiration, Extensions and Revisions. Minor Exception approval is effective and may only be extended or revised as provided for in Section TBD, Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension. 5. Revocation. The Minor Exception approval may be revoked pursuant to Section TBD, Revocation, if any of the conditions or terms of the approval are violated or if any law or ordinance is violated. Page 780 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 55 of 95 EXHIBIT H CHAPTER 17.68 – MINOR USE PERMITS Chapter 17.68 (Procedure, Hearings, Notices and Fees) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.68 (Minor Use Permits) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.09 68 Minor Use Permits 17.0968.010 Purpose The Minor Use Permit review and approval process is intended to apply to uses that are consistent with the with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and purposes of the zone where they are proposed but require special consideration to ensure that based on the specifics can be designed, located, and operated in a manner that will be compatible with the surrounding area and uses. 17.0968.020 Applicability Approval of a Minor Use Permit is required for uses or developments specifically identified in any section of this Title which requires a Minor Use Permit. 17.0968.030 Review Authority The Community Development Director or designee shall be the review authority for Minor Use Permits. However, the Director may refer any application for a Minor Use Permit for a project that may generate substantial public controversy or involve significant land use policy decisions to the Planning Commission for decision. In that case, the application shall be processed as a Conditional Use Permit. 17.0968.040 Procedures A. Application. Applications for Minor Use Permits shall be filed with the Community Development Department on the prescribed application forms as prescribed by the Director. pursuant to Section TBD, Application Forms and Fees and Section TBD, Review of Applications. The application for a Minor Use Permit shall include data or other evidence in support of the applicable findings required by Section TBD, Required Findings. Commented [HB9]: Minor Use Permits are intended for uses that have the potential to create small impacts to neighboring properties. This permit process would allow for public input and allow the City to impose additional requirements to avoid impacts Edits improve readability and remove duplicate requirements. Page 781 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 56 of 95 B. Public Notice and Hearing. All applications for Minor Use Permits shall require a public notice prior to the Director or designee decision, pursuant to Section TBD17.03.050, (Public Notice). C. Report of Decisions and Findings. Except as set forth below, the Community Development Director shall issue the Minor Use Permit no more than thirty (30) days following the filing of a complete application. therefor. Approval will be based upon determining the request complies with the standards, limitations and other regulations in the governing section, which may include the imposition of conditions and limitations to ensure the permit is consistent with said requirements and protects the public health, safety and welfare; otherwise, the Director shall deny the application and provide the applicant a written statement of the reasons the permit cannot be issued. The applicant shall be advised in writing of the right to appeal the Director’s decision pursuant to Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. 17.0968.050 Required Findings The Community Development Director or designee must make all of the following findings to approve or conditionally approve a Minor Use application. The inability to make one or more of the findings is grounds for denial of an application. A. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Title and all other Titles of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code;  B. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan;  C. The proposed use will not be averse to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the community, nor detrimental to surrounding properties or improvements;  D. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity are compatible with the existing and reasonably foreseeable future land uses and circulation in the vicinity; and  E. The site is physically suitable for the type of the use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints.  Page 782 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 57 of 95 17.0968.060 Conditions of Approval In approving a Minor Use Permit, the review authority may impose reasonable conditions or restrictions and/or require reasonable guarantees and evidence that such conditions are being, or will be, complied with, to achieve the following outcomes: A. Ensure that the proposal conforms in all significant respects with the General Plan and with any other applicable plans or policies adopted by the City Council; B. Achieve the general purposes of this Title or the specific purpose of the zone in which the project is located; C. Achieve the findings for a Minor Use Permit listed in Section TBD17.68.050., Required Findings; or D. Mitigate any potentially significant impacts identified because of environmental review conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 17.0968.070 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation A. Appeals. Appeals of Minor Use Permits shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Minor Use Permit may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Minor Use Permit shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). D. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Minor Use Permit has become final, no further application for the same use shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fees. Page 783 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 58 of 95 b. Appeals. Minor Use Permit decisions are subject to the appeal provisions of Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. c. Expiration, Extensions and Revisions. Minor Use Permit approval is effective and may only be extended or revised as provided for in Section TBD, Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension. d. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Minor Use Permit has become final, no further application for the same use shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fees. e. Revocation. Minor Use Permit approval may be revoked pursuant to Section TBD, Revocation, if any of the conditions or terms of the approval are violated or if any law or ordinance is violated. Page 784 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 59 of 95 EXHIBIT I CHAPTER 17.70 – CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Chapter 17.70 (Revocation and Expiration) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.70 (Conditional Use Permit) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.10 70 Conditional Use Permits 17.1070.010 Purpose. The purpose of a Conditional Use Permit shall be to provide for the individual review of certain uses, which due to the nature of the use, size, or intensity of the use requirerequires a Planning Commission review. 17.1070.020 Applicability Approval of a Conditional Use Permit is required for uses or developments specifically identified in any section of this Title which requires a Conditional Use Permit. 17.1070.030 Review Authority The Planning Commission may grant Conditional Use Permits to determine if the use proposed, or the location of that use, is compatible with the surrounding uses, or may be made compatible with the imposition of conditions of approval. 17.1070.040 Procedures A. Application. Applications for Conditional Use Permits shall be filed with the Community Development Department on the prescribed application forms prescribed by the Director.pursuant to Section TBD, Application Forms and Fees and Section TBD, Review of Applications. The application for a Conditional Use Permit shall include data or other evidence in support of the applicable findings required by Section TBD, Required Findings. B. Public Notice. An application for a Conditional Use Permit shall require a public notice prior to the Planning Commission decisionhearing, pursuant to Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice).Section TBD, Public Notice. Commented [HB10]: Conditional Use Permits are intended for uses that have the potential to create impacts to neighboring properties. This is different from Minor Use Permits in that these uses have a greater potential for impacts and require more in-depth review and additional public input. This permit process would allow for public input and allow the Planning Commission to impose additional requirements to avoid impacts. Edits improve readability and remove duplicate requirements. Page 785 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 60 of 95 C. Public Hearing. An application for a Conditional Use Permit shall require a public hearing before the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 17.03.060 (Conduct of Public Hearings).Section TBD Conduct of Public Hearings. D. Report on Findings and Decision. Not more than twenty (20) days following the public hearing on a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission shall announce its findings by formal report resolution and said report resolution shall recite, among other things, the facts and reasons which, in its opinion, make the granting or denial of the Conditional Use Permit and when granted, shall recite such conditions and limitations as it may impose. E. Report to be Numbered and Kept as Permanent Record. The formal report of the Planning Commission announcing its decision on a Conditional Use Permit shall be numbered consecutively in the order of filing and shall become a permanent record in the file of the Planning Commission. F. Notice of decision to applicant. Not later than ten days following the rendering of a decision ordering that a Conditional Use Permit be granted or denied, a copy of the report shall be mailed to the applicant and their attorney at the address shown on the application filed with the Planning Commission. G. Effective date – Time limitation for appeal. The order of the Planning Commission in granting or denying a Conditional Use Permit shall become final and effective ten days from the date of the succeeding City Council meeting at which it is determined whether or not to review the decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 2.52.040 of this code until within such ten-day period an appeal in writing is filed with the Council by any person dissatisfied with the decision of the Planning Commission. The filing of such appeal within such time shall stay the effective date of the order of the Planning Commission until such time as the Council has acted on the appeal as hereinafter set forth in this Title. H. Transmission of Planning Commission’s record to City Council. Upon receipt of a written appeal filed with the City Clerk as provided herein, the Page 786 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 61 of 95 Planning Commission shall thereupon transmit to the City Council the Planning Commission’s complete record of the case. I. Council to hold public hearing on appeal. Not more than forty (40) calendar days following filing of a written appeal, the City Council shall conduct a duly advertised public hearing, public notice of which shall be given at least ten calendar days prior to said hearing in accordance with requirements established by resolution of the Council. J. Council to announce findings and decision. City Council shall announce its findings and decision not more than sixty (60) days, following the close of the public hearing, unless good cause is shown for the extension of time and the applicant or opponent, or both, are notified of this extension and the reasons therefor. The findings and decision shall recite the facts and reasons which in the opinion of the City Council make the approval or denial of the conditional use permit necessary to carry out the general purpose of this Title, and shall order that the Conditional Use Permit be granted, denied or modified subject to such conditions or limitations that it may impose. City Council may incorporate by reference all or part of any findings of the commission. If the City Council does not announce its findings and decision, notice shall be given by mail to the applicant or opponent, or to both if they are different parties, of when the findings and decision will be made so that the applicant or opponent or both may be present at the meeting when said findings and decision are announced. K. Decision of the council shall be final. The action by the City Council on such matters shall be by a majority vote of the Council, and shall be final and conclusive except: 11. The City Council may approve, modify or disapprove the recommendation of the Planning Commission; provided, that any modification of a proposed Conditional Use Permit by the Council may be referred back to the Planning Commission for report and recommendation, and the Planning Commission shall not be required to hold a public hearing thereon. Failure of the planning commission to report to the city council within forty (40) days after the reference, or such longer period as may be designated by the Page 787 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 62 of 95 city council, shall be deemed to be approval of the proposed modification. 12. Upon return of the matter to the City Council, the City Council may by majority vote, approve, modify or disapprove the final recommendation of the Planning Commission on such matters. L. Notice of Decision of the Council. Not later than thirty (30) days following the final decision of the City Council that a Conditional Use Permit be granted or denied, notice of such action shall be mailed to the applicant or opponent, or both if they be different parties, and one copy shall be attached to the Planning Commission’s file of the case and said file returned to the Planning Commission for permanent filing. Failure to give notice shall not affect the decision rendered in these matters. 17.10.050 Scope of Conditional Use Permit Review d. Criteria for review. In reviewing any Conditional Use Permit for any use, the following criteria for granting said permit shall be considered: 6. Distance from existing residential uses; 7. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking facilities, and its distance from the proposed use; 8. Location of and distance to churches, schools, hospitals and public playgrounds; 9. The combination of uses proposed; 10. Site specific operation and design features; 11. The relationship of the proposed business-generated traffic volume and the size of streets serving the area; 12. The proposed exterior signs and décor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area; 13. The number of similar establishments or uses within close proximity to the proposed establishment; Page 788 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 63 of 95 14. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use; 15. Impact of the proposed use to the City’s infrastructure, and/or services; 16. Will the establishment contribute to a concentration of similar outlets in the area; 17. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the Planning Commission, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the as a whole. 17.1070.0560 Required findings. The Planning Commission must make all of the following findings to approve a Conditional Use Permit application. The inability to make one or more of the findings is grounds for denial of an application. A. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Title and all other Titles of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code; B. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; C. The proposed use will not be averse to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the community, nor detrimental to surrounding properties or improvements; D. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity are compatible with the existing and reasonably foreseeable future land uses and circulation in the vicinity; and E. The site is physically suitable for the type of the use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints. 17.1070.0670 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation A. Appeals. Appeals of Conditional Use Permits shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). Page 789 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 64 of 95 B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Conditional Use Permit may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Conditional Use Permit shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). D. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Conditional Use Permit has become final, no further application for the same use shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fees. 3. Appeals. Conditional Use Permit decisions are subject to the appeal provisions of Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. 4. Expiration, Extensions and Revisions. Conditional Use Permit approval is effective and may only be extended or revised as provided for in Section TBD, Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension or the following, whichever the strictest standards apply. 1. A Conditional Use Permit shall expire and become null and void, when any of the following apply: i. Permit Not Issued. If the Conditional Use Permit is not used within two (2) years after the granting of the Permit; provided that the Director may grant an extension of the Permit for an additional period as provided in this Title. ii. Discontinuation of Use. For any Conditional Use permit (CUP) effectuated more than five years before (INSERT EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE), the CUP shall expire if the use is discontinued for 12 months or more. The Community Development Director shall make a written determination of expiration based on evidence of abandonment including documentation of business closure including but not limited to inactive City business license issued in accordance with Title 5 of Page 790 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 65 of 95 HBMC. The Director shall not find an effectuated Conditional Use Permit expired when an application for a building permit or entitlement has been filed within 12 months of discontinuation to modify the CUP permitted use, so long as the application or permit remains current, and is diligently pursued. This exception is not applicable when a building is voluntarily demolished. 5. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Conditional Use Permit has become final, no further application for the same use shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fee 6. Revocation. The Conditional Use Permit approval may be revoked pursuant to Section TBD, Revocation, if any of the conditions or terms of the approval are violated or if any law or ordinance is violated. Page 791 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 66 of 95 EXHIBIT J CHAPTER 17.72 – PARKING PLAN Chapter 17.72 (Permits, Licenses, Restrictions and Covenants) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.72 (Parking Plan) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.11 72 Parking Plan 17.1172.010 Purpose The purpose of this section is to allow for an alternative configuration of parking to wholly or partially satisfy the Off-Street Parking Chapter of Title 17. 17.1072.020 Applicability Parking Plans may be requested by a property owner in accordance with the Off-Street Parking Chapter of Title 17. 17.1172.030 Review Authority The Planning Commission shall act as the review authority for all Parking plans. 17.1172.040 Procedures A. Application. Applications for Parking Plans shall be filed with the Community Development Department on the prescribed application forms prescribed by the Community Development Director. pursuant to Section TBD, Application Forms and Fees and Section TBD, Review of Applications. The application for a Parking Plan shall include data or other evidence in support of the applicable findings required by Section TBD, Required Findings. B. Public Notice. An application for a Parking Plan shall require a public notice prior to the Planning Commission decision, pursuant to Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice)Section TBD, Public Notice. C. Public Hearing. An application for a Parking Plan shall require a public hearing before the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 17.03.060 (Conduct of Public Hearings). Section TBD, “Conduct of Public Hearings”. Commented [HB11]: Parking Plans are currently authorized by HBMC §17.44.210. Parking Plans allow the Planning Commission to reduce the number of parking spaces required for a specific business. This section adds the review and approval authority. Edits improve readability and remove duplicate requirements. Page 792 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 67 of 95 17.1172.050 Required Findings The Planning Commission must make all of the following findings to approve or conditionally approve a Parking Plan application. The inability to make one or more the findings is ground for denial of an application. A. The Parking Plan conforms in all significant respects with the General Plan and with any other applicable plans or policies adopted by the City Council; B. The Parking Plan is consistent with the purposes of this Title and the specific purpose of the Zone in which the project is located; C. The Parking Plan satisfies all the applicable criteria for the Parking Plan configuration requested in accordance with the Off-Street Parking Chapter of Title 17. D. The granting of the requested modification would not be detrimental to the public, health, safety or welfare of the public. 17.1172.060 Conditions of Approval In approving a Parking Plan, the review authority may impose reasonable conditions or restrictions and/or require reasonable guarantees and evidence that such conditions are being, or will be, complied with, to achieve the following outcomes: A. Ensure that the proposal complies with the general purpose of Title 17 or the specific procedures of the zone in which the project is located; B. Achieve the findings for the Parking Plan listed in Section TBD, “Required Findings”17.72.050 (Required Findings). C. A covenant with the City a party thereto, may be required limiting the use of the property and/or designating the method by which the required parking will be provided at the time that the Planning Commission determines that inadequate parking exists. 17.1172.070 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation Page 793 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 68 of 95 A. Appeals. Appeals of Parking Plan shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Parking Plan may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Parking Plan shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). D. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Parking Plan has become final, no further application for the same use shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fees. D. Appeals. Parking Plan decisions are subject to the appeal provisions of Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. E. Expiration, Extensions and Revisions. Parking Plan approval is effective and may only be extended or revised as provided for in Chapter TBD, Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension. F. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Parking Plan has become final, no further application for the same Parking Plan shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing six months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fee G. Revocation. The Parking Plan approval may be revoked pursuant to Section TBD, Revocation, if any of the conditions or terms of the approval are violated or if any law or ordinance is violated. Page 794 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 69 of 95 EXHIBIT K CHAPTER 17.74 – PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Chapter 17.74 (Penalty) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.74 (Precise Development Plan)) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.12 74 Precise Development Plans 17.1274.010 Purpose This Chapter establishes Precise Development Plan procedures to ensure that new development supports the goals and objectives of the General Plan and other adopted plans and guidelines. The specific purposes of the Precise Development Plan process are to: A. Promote excellence in design, layout, and other physical features of development to achieve a reasonable level of quality, compatibility, in harmony with the community’s social, economic and environmental objectives; B. Ensure that new and altered development will be compatible with the existing and potential development of the surrounding area; and C. Supplement other City regulations and standards in order to ensure control of physical features of development that are not otherwise addressed. 17.1274.020 Applicability A Major or Minor Precise Development Plan, as specified in Section 17.74.025, is required for all projects that require a permit for new construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, alteration, or other improvements to a structure, site, or a parking area except for: A. New construction or additions of less than 1,500 square foot addition any zone. B. Interior remodel of 3,000 square feet or less, with no exterior changes, in any zone. Commented [HB12]: Precise Development Plans allow for the public to provide input on the development of new structures and buildings. Single family homes and small tenant improvements are exempt Smaller residential projects, solar carports, and larger tenant improvements would be reviewed by the Community Development Director. Larger residential projects, mixed use projects, any change to the exterior of a nonresidential building would require Planning Commission review. Edits improve readability. remove duplicate requirements, and add the Minor Precise Development Plan process, which is intended to streamline smaller projects, per Planning Commission direction. Page 795 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 70 of 95 C. Single Family (one unit) residential projects and any related accessory structures. D. New residential projects with two (2) or more dwelling units including a minimum of 20% lower-income units. E. Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units. D.F. Dwelling Units provided pursuant to California Government Code Section 6585.21, commonly referred to as SB 9 units or urban dwelling units. A. Projects including minimum of 20% lower-income units that qualify for a density bonus pursuant to Section 17.42.100. 17.74.025 Minor and Major Precise Development Plan A. Minor Precise Development Plan. A Minor Precise Development Plan shall be required for the following: 1. Residential only projects with only 2-4 dwelling units. 2. Mixed use projects that do not exceed four dwelling units or 3,000 square feet of nonresidential floor area. 3. Interior remodel greater than 3,000 square feet, with no exterior changes, in any zone. B. Major Precise Development Plan. A Major Precise Development Plan shall be required for the following: 1. Residential only projects with 5 or more dwelling units. 2. Any mMixed-use development with five or more dwelling units or include a nonresidential floor area of 3,001 square feet or greater regardless of the number of dwelling units, regardless of the number of dwelling units. 3. Any nonresidential project that is not exempt or qualifies for a Minor Precise Development Plan. Page 796 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 71 of 95 17.1274.030 Review Authority The Director shall act as the review authority of Minor Precise Development Plans and the Planning Commission shall act as the review authority for Major Precise Development Plans. 17.1274.040 Procedures A. Application. Applications for Precise Development Plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department on the forms prescribed application forms prescribed by the Director.pursuant to Section TBD, Application Forms and Fees and Section TBD, Review of Applications. The application for a Precise Development Plan shall include data or other evidence in support of the applicable findings required by Section TBD, Required Findings. B. Public Notice. An application for a Precise Develop Plan shall require a public notice prior to the Planning Commissionreview authority’s decision, pursuant to Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice). Section TBD, Public Notice. C. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Parking Plan has become final, no further application for the same Parking Plan shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fee. D. Public Hearing. No public hearing shall be required for an application for a Minor Precise Development Plans. An application for a Major Precise Development Plan shall require a public hearing before the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 17.03.060 (Conduct of Public Hearings).Section TBD, Conduct of Public Hearings. 17.12.050 Scope of Precise Development Plan Review 5. Precise Development Plan Review Considerations. Precise Development Plan review shall be based on consideration of the requirements of this Chapter as they apply to the design of the site plan, structures, landscaping, and other physical features of a proposed project, including: Page 797 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 72 of 95 a. Building proportions, massing, and architectural details; b. Site design, orientation, location, and architectural design of buildings relative to existing structures on or adjacent to the property, topography, and other physical features of the natural and built environment; c. Size, location, design, development, and arrangement of on- site parking and other paved areas; d. Height, materials, and design of fences, walls, and screen plantings; e. Location and type of landscaping including selection and size of plant materials, and design of hardscape; and f. Size, location, design, color, lighting, and materials of all signs. 17.7412.0560 Required Findings The review authority must make all of the following findings to approve or conditionally approve a Precise Development Plan application. The inability to make one or more of the findings is grounds for denial of an application. A. The design, layout, and other physical features of the project complies with all other applicable provisions of this Title and all other Titles of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code; B. The design, layout, and other physical features of the project is consistent with the General Plan, and any applicable specific plan or design guidelines; C. The design, layout, and other physical features of the project complies with any design or development standards applicable to the zone or the use in question, unless waived or modified pursuant to the provisions of this Title; and D. The design, layout, and other physical features of the project are compatible with the desired form and character of the area, as established in the General Plan. Page 798 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 73 of 95 17.1274.070 060 Conditions of Approval In approving a Precise Development Plan, the review authority may impose reasonable conditions or restrictions and/or require reasonable guarantees and evidence that such conditions are being, or will be, complied with, to achieve the following outcomes: A. Ensure that the proposal conforms in all significant respects with the General Plan and with any other applicable plans or policies adopted by the City Council; B. Achieve the general purposes of this Title or the specific purpose of the zone in which the project is located; C. Achieve the findings for a Precise Development Plan listed in Section TBD, Required Findings; and D. Mitigate any potentially significant impacts identified because of environmental review conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 17.1274.0780 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation A. Appeals. Appeals of Precise Development Plan shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Precise Development Plan may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Precise Development Plan shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). D. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Precise Development Plan has become final, no further application for the same use shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fees. Page 799 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 74 of 95 5. Appeals. Precise Development Plan decisions are subject to the appeal provisions of Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. 6. Expiration, Extensions and Revisions. Precise Development Plan approval is effective and may only be extended or revised as provided for in Section TBD, Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension. 7. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Precise Development Plan has become final, no further application for the same Parking Plan shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing six months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fee 8. Revocation. Precise Development Plan approval may be revoked pursuant to Section TBD, Revocation, if any of the conditions or terms of the approval are violated or if any law or ordinance is violated. Page 800 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 75 of 95 EXHIBIT L CHAPTER 17.76 – VARIANCES Chapter 17.76 (Conditional use permits)is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.76 (Variances) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.13 76 Variances 17.1376.010 Purpose This Chapter is intended to provide a mechanism for relief from the strict application of this Title where it would deprive the property owner of privileges enjoyed by similar properties because of the subject property’s unique and special conditions. 17.7613.020 Applicability Variances may be granted to vary or modify dimensional and performancedevelopment standards but may not be granted to allow uses or activities that this Title does not authorize for a specific lot or site. 17.7613.030 Review Authority The Planning Commission shall act as the review authority for Variance applications based on consideration of the requirements of this Chapter. 17.7613.040 Procedures A. Application. Applications for a Variance shall be filed with the Community Development Department on the prescribed application forms prescribed by the Director. in accordance with the procedures in Section TBD, Application Forms and Fees and Section TBD, Review of Applications. The application for a Variance shall include data or other evidence in support of the applicable findings required by Section TBD, Required Findings. B. Public Notice. An application for a Variance shall require a public notice prior to the Planning Commission decision, pursuant to Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice).Section TBD, Public Notice. Commented [HB13]: A variance is a request to deviate from any development standard. This would require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. Edits improve readability and remove duplicate requirements. Page 801 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 76 of 95 C. Public Hearing. An application for a Variance shall require a public hearing before the Planning Commission, pursuant to Section 17.03.060 (Conduct of Public Hearings).Section TBD, Conduct of Public Hearings. 17.1376.050 Required Findings After conducting a public hearing, the Planning Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve or conditionally approve a Variance application. The Commission shall deny an application for a Variance if it is unable to make any of the required findings, in which case it shall state the reasons for that determination. A. There are exceptional or extraordinary physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the vicinity and identical zone, and that the granting of a Variance will not constitute a granting of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on the property in the vicinity and identical zone; B. The granting of the Variance is necessary to prevent a physical hardship which is not of the applicant’s own actions or the actions of a predecessor in interest; C. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and D. The granting of the Variance will be consistent with the general purposes and objectives of this Title, any applicable specific plans, and the General Plan. 17.1376.060 Conditions of Approval In approving a Variance, the review authority may impose reasonable conditions or restrictions and/or require reasonable guarantees and evidence that such conditions are being, or will be, complied with, to achieve the following outcomes: Page 802 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 77 of 95 A. Ensure that the proposal conforms in all significant respects with the General Plan and with any other applicable plans or policies adopted by the City Council; B. Achieve the general purposes of this Title or the specific purposes of the zone in which the project is located; C. Achieve the findings for a Variance granted; or D. Mitigate any potentially significant impacts identified because of review conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 17.7613.070 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation A. Appeals. Appeals of Variances shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review). B. Expiration and Extension. An approved Variances may expire or be extended pursuant to Section 17.03.090 (Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension). C. Revocation and Expiration. Revocation and Expiration of any Variances shall be processed pursuant to Section 17.03.110 (Revocation of Permits). D. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Variances has become final, no further application for the same use shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fees. E. Appeals. Variance decisions are subject to the appeal provisions of Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. F. Expiration, Extensions and Revisions. Variance approval is effective and may only be extended or revised as provided for in Chapter TBD, Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension. G. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Variance has become final, no further application for the same Variance shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to Page 803 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 78 of 95 resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fee. H. Revocation. Variance approval may be revoked pursuant to Section TBD, Revocation, if any of the conditions or terms of the approval are violated or if any law or ordinance is violated. Page 804 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 79 of 95 EXHIBIT M CHAPTER 17.78 – COASTAL CLEARANCE Chapter 17.78 (Coastal Clearance) added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.18 78 Coastal Clearance 17.1878.010 Purpose The purpose of this section is to ensure all public and private development in the Coastal Zone receives a clearance confirming the development conforms to all provisions of Title 16, Title 17, and any Land Use Plan or Coastal Development Permit. 17.1878.020 Applicability This Section shall apply to all development in the Coastal Zone, as defined by the Coastal Act. 17.1878.030 Review Authority A request for Coastal Clearance may be submitted with another application. The review authority shall be in accordance with the Section 17.02.050 Review Authorities for Decisions and Appeals.TBD, Review Authorities for Decisions and Appeals. 17.1878.040 Procedure A. Application. Applications for Coastal Clearance shall be filed with the Community Development Department on the prescribed application forms prescribed by the Director. in accordance with the procedures in Section TBD, Application Forms and Fees and Section TBD, Review of Applications. B. Conditions of Approval. Prior to permit issuance of any development within the Coastal Zone the applicant shall demonstrate an approval, wavier, or exemption by the California Coastal Commission. C. Post-Approval. Before permit issuance, the Community Development Director or designee shall review the California Coastal Commission’s Commented [HB14]: Coastal Clearenaces will be required for developments in the Coastal Zone. They are intended to ensure any changes made by the Coastal Commission still comply with the City’s codes. Edits improve readability Page 805 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 80 of 95 approval, waiver, or exemption for consistency with the Director’s approval in concept. Page 806 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 81 of 95 EXHIBIT N CHAPTER 17.80 – DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS Chapter 17.80 (Certificates of occupancy) is hereby deleted in its entirety and new Chapter 17.80 (Development Agreements) is added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.14 80 Development Agreements 17.1480.010 Purpose This Chapter establishes procedures and requirements for considering and entering into a voluntary legally binding agreements, with applicants for development projects, as authorized in Government Code Sections 65864- 65869.5. The development agreement is intended to provide assurance to the City that a proposed project will proceed to its completion in compliance with the plans submitted and provides assurance to the applicant that the project can proceed to its completion in accordance with the rules and regulations in effect at the time of project approval. 17.1480.020 Applicability A voluntary agreement that may be initiated by a property owner, or by the Director, for a complex or multi-phase development project that is consistent with the General Plan. 17.1480.030 Review Authority The Planning Commission shall act as the advisory body for all Development Agreements and provide its recommendation to the City Council. The City Council shall act as the review authority, and after receiving recommendations from the Planning Commission, may adopt, reject, or modify a Development Agreement. 17.1480.040 Procedures A. Processing Proposed Development Agreements. A Development Agreement which may be proposed by the City or any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property shall be processed in the manner of a Zone Change as provided in Article 15 and shall conform to Commented [HB15]: A Development Agreement is a contract between a project developer and the City. They provide a vested right to develop the project in exchange for a public benefit. Development Agreements must be approved by the City Council. Edits improve readability and remove provisions for appeals, expiration, extension and revocation since these are required to be listed in the development agreement document. Page 807 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 82 of 95 the requirements of Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 65864) Division 1, of the Government Code entitled "Development Agreements." B. Development Agreement Content All development agreements shall contain the following provisions: 1. Duration of the agreement; 2. Permitted uses for the subject property; 3. Density or intensity of the permitted uses; 4. Approved site plans, elevations, floor plans and sections, including the maximum height and size of proposed buildings; 5. Provisions, if any, for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes or other contribution to public improvements and amenities of benefit to the City; 6. Protection from either a future growth control ordinance or a future increase in development impact fees; 7. Provisions that address the applicable environmental review for the project; 8. Provisions requiring periodic review of the Development Agreement; under Section; TBD 9. Provisions that would necessitate a reconsideration or amendment of the development agreement if any health and safety issues of compelling public necessity are discovered (i.e., a new environmental health hazard is discovered); 10. Provisions for the expiration and extension of said expiration of the agreement. 9.11. Provisions to amend or cancel, in whole or in part, by mutual consent of all parties to the agreement, or their successor-in- interest, in compliance with state law (Government Code Section 65868). Page 808 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 83 of 95 10.12. Provisions which are appropriate and acceptable to the City Attorney, that the developer shall commence construction or satisfy other requirements within a specified timeframe; and 11.13. Any other terms determined to be appropriate and necessary including provisions for payment to the City. C. Periodic Review Requirement. 1. The Planning Commission shall review the Development Agreement every 12 months, unless otherwise specified in the Development Agreement, after the approval of the agreement for the life of the project to determine whether the contracting party or the successor has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement. 2. The applicant shall initiate the review by filing a request for review along with the corresponding fee established by City Council within 60 days prior to the anniversary of the date of approval. The applicant shall submit evidence demonstrating the applicant’s good-faith compliance with the Development Agreement. 3. If as a result of this review, the Planning Commission finds and determines time of annual review, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the contracting party or the successor in interest has not complied with, a report shall be made the City Council, and referred to the City Attorney’s office for action. 17.1480.050 Required Findings The following findings shall be made before approval of a Development Agreement or amendment: A. The Development Agreement is in the best interests of the City, promoting the public interest and welfare through public benefits; and B. The Development Agreement is consistent with all applicable provisions of the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and this Zoning Ordinance. 17.14.060 Appeals; Expiration, Extensions, and Revisions; Revocation Page 809 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 84 of 95 Q. Appeals. Development Agreements may not be appealed as the Planning Commission review authority is advisory. R. Expiration, Extensions and Revisions. A Development Agreement approval is effective and may only be extended or revised as provided for in Chapter TBD, Effective Dates: Expiration and Extension. S. Amendment or Cancellation Procedure. A Development Agreement may be amended or canceled, in whole or in part, by mutual consent of all parties to the agreement, or their successor-in-interest, in compliance with state law (Government Code Section 65868), or as set forth in the agreement. The requested amendment or cancellation shall be processed in the same manner specified by this chapter for the adoption of a development agreement. Page 810 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 85 of 95 EXHIBIT O CHAPTER 17.82 – SPECIFIC PLANS Chapter 17.82 (Specific Plans) is hereby added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.15 82 Specific Plans 17.1582.010 Purpose This Chapter establishes procedures for the consideration, adoption, and implementation of specific plans for the purpose of implementing PLAN Hermosa (“the General Plan”) on an area-specific basis. 17.1582.020 Applicability A. The procedures in this Chapter shall apply to all proposals to establish a Specific Plan Area, amend or a Specific Plan Area. When changes to the Zoning Ordinance or zone or boundary line shown on the Zoning Map are required, a Zoning Amendment shall also be required. B. Initiation of Amendment. A Specific Plan or amendment to a Specific Plan may be initiated by the owner of the subject property, the Director, by motion of the Planning Commission, or by a motion of the City Councilby an applicant or by a motion of the City Council or Planning Commission. 17.1582.030 Review Authority The Planning Commission shall act as the advisory body for all proposed Specific Plans and Specific Plan Amendments. The Planning Commission shall provide recommendations to the City Council. The City Council shall act as the final review authority and upon receiving a recommendation from the Planning Commission, may adopt, reject, or modify a Specific Plan. 17.1582.040 Procedures A. Application. Applications for Specific Plans shall be filed with the Community Development Department on the prescribed application forms prescribed by the Director.pursuant to Section TBD “Application Forms and Fees” and Section TBD Review of Applications. The application Commented [HB16]: A Specific Plan is a zoning document used to guide development in a specific, smaller area of the City rather than citywide. Specific Plans require City Council approval Edits improve readability and ensure the City’s codes are inline with State law. Page 811 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 86 of 95 for a Specific Plans shall include data or other evidence in support of the applicable findings required by Section TBD, Required Findings. B. Public Hearing and Notice. All Specific Plan and Specific Plan Amendments shall be referred to the Planning Commission, which shall conduct at least one public hearing on any proposed amendment prior to submitting a recommendation report to the City Council. At least ten (10) days before the date of any public hearing, the City shall provide notice as provided for in Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice).Section TBD, Public Notice. C. Planning Commission Hearing. Before submitting a recommendation to the City Council, the Planning Commission shall conduct at least one public hearing. D. Recommendation to City Council. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation on the Specific Plan to the City Council. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the recommendation, findings related to General Plan consistency, and a discussion of the relationship of the proposed amendment to other adopted documents. The recommendation shall be transmitted to the City Council with a copy of the approved minutes from the Planning Commission hearing. 1. Approval. If the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed amendment, the City Council is required to take final action pursuant to Section TBD, City Council Hearing and Action. 2. Denial. If the Planning Commission has recommended against the proposed amendment, the City Council is not required to take any further action unless an appeal is filed in accordance with Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review)Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. E. City Council Hearing and Action 1. City Council Hearing. After receiving the recommendation from the Planning Commission, the City Council shall hold a hearing in accordance with Section TBD, Conduct of Public Hearings. The notice for the hearing shall include a summary of the Planning Commission recommendation. Page 812 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 87 of 95 2. City Council Action. After the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may approve, modify, or deny the proposed Specific Plan or Specific Plan amendment. F. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Specific Plan has become final, no further application for the same Specific Plan shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. 1. Determination if the new application has resolved the review authority’s previous objections shall be made by the Director. 1.2. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fee. 17.1582.050 Required Findings The following findings shall be made prior to approval of any specific plan or specific plan amendment: A. The specific plan or amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan; B. The specific plan or amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare; C. The specific plan or amendment is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties, and ensures development of desirable character that will be harmonious with surrounding properties; D. The specific plan or amendment is suitable and appropriate for the location, access, and topography for the development of the subject property; 17.82.060 Amendments A Specific Plan may be amended in the same manner as a new Specific Plan is adopted. Page 813 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 88 of 95 EXHIBIT P CHAPTER 17.84 – ZONING AMENDMENTS Chapter 17.84 (Zoning Amendments) is hereby added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.16 84 Zoning Amendments 17.1684.010 Purpose This Chapter establishes procedures by which changes may be made to the text of this Zoning Ordinance and to the Zoning Map, whenever the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good practice justify such amendment, consistent with the General Plan. 17.1684.020 Applicability A. The procedures in this Chapter shall apply to all proposals to change the text of this Zoning Ordinance or to revise a zone or boundary line shown on the Zoning Map. B. Initiation of Amendment. An amendment to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map may be initiated by any applicantthe Director, by motion of the Planning Commission, or by a motion of the City Council. or Planning Commission. An amendment to the Zoning Map may be initiated by the owner of the subject property, the Director, by motion of the Planning Commission, or by a motion of the City Council. 17.1684.030 Review Authority The Planning Commission shall act as the advisory body for all amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map and provide recommendations to the City Council. The City Council shall act as the final review authority and upon receiving a recommendation from the Planning Commission, may adopt, reject, or modify all zoning amendments. 17.1684.040 Procedures A. Application. Applications for Zoning Amendments shall be filed with the Community Development Department on the prescribed application forms prescribed by the Director. pursuant to Section TBD, Application Commented [HB17]: This sections provides the method for future amendments to the Zoning Code. Edits improve readability and establish ability to amend the zoning map. Page 814 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 89 of 95 Forms and Fees and Section TBD, Review of Applications. The application for a Zoning Amendment shall include data or other evidence in support of the applicable findings required by Section TBD, Required Findings. B. Public Hearing and Notice. All amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map shall be referred to the Planning Commission, which shall conduct at least one public hearing on any proposed amendment prior to submitting a recommendation report to the City Council. At least 10 20 days before the date of any public hearing, the City shall provide notice as provided for in Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice).Section TBD, Public Notice. C. Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation 1. Planning Commission Hearing. Before submitting a recommendation to the City Council, the Planning Commission shall conduct at least one public hearing. 2. Recommendation to City Council. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation on the proposed amendment to the City Council. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the recommendation, findings related to General Plan consistency, and a discussion of the relationship of the proposed amendment to other adopted documents. The recommendation shall be transmitted to the City Council with a copy of the approved minutes from the Planning Commission hearing. a. Approval. If the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed amendment, the City Council is required to take final action pursuant to Section TBD, City Council Hearing and Action. b. Denial. If the Planning Commission has recommended against the proposed amendment, the City Council is not required to take any further action unless an appeal is filed in accordance with Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review).Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. c. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Zoning Amendment has become final, no further application for the Page 815 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 90 of 95 same Zoning Amendment shall be filed for the same property for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. i. Determination if the new application has resolved the review authority’s previous objections shall be made by the Director. i.ii. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fee. D. City Council Hearing and Action 1. City Council Hearing. After receiving the recommendation from the Planning Commission, the City Council shall hold a hearing in accordance with Section 17.03.060 (Conduct of Public Hearings)Section TBD, Conduct of Public Hearings. The notice for the hearing shall include a summary of the Planning Commission recommendation. 2. City Council Action. After the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may approve, modify, or deny the proposed amendment. If the Council proposes any substantial revision not previously considered by the Planning Commission during its hearings, the proposed revision shall first be referred to the Planning Commission for report and recommendation, but the Planning Commission shall not be required to hold a public hearing. The failure of the Planning Commission to report within 45 days after the referral shall be deemed a recommendation for approval and the amendment shall be returned to Council for adoption. 17.1684.050 Required Findings The following findings shall be made prior to approval of any Zoning Amendment: A. The amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; Page 816 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 91 of 95 B. The amendment is consistent with the intent of the vision, goals and objectives, and policies of PLAN Hermosa, the city’s general plan; and C. The amendment is consistent with the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, Title 17. Page 817 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 92 of 95 EXHIBIT Q CHAPTER 17.84 – ZONING AMENDMENTS Chapter 17.86 (General Plan Amendment) is hereby added to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 17.17 86 General Plan Amendment 17.1786.010 Purpose This chapter establishes procedures for making changes to the General Plan as provided for in State Law when there are necessary reasons to do so as a result of changes in conditions or circumstances unforeseen at the time of adoption or last amendment of the General Plan. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, changes in State or Federal law and problems and opportunities that were unanticipated at the time of adoption or last amendment. 17.1786.020 Applicability The procedures in this Chapter shall apply to all proposals to change the text of the General Plan or to change a general plan designation or boundary line as shown on the General Plan Map. 17.1786.030 Initiation of Amendment. An amendment to the text of the General Plan may be initiated by the Director, by motion of the Planning Commission, or by a motion of the City Council. An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map may be initiated by the owner of the subject property, the Director, by motion of the Planning Commission, or by a motion of the City Council.An amendment to the General Plan or General Plan map may only be initiated at the direction of the City Council. The City Council is the final review authority for General Plan Amendments. 17.1786.040 Review Authority The Planning Commission shall act as the advisory body for all amendments to City’s General Plan and General Plan Map and provide recommendations to the City Council. The City Council shall act as the final review authority and upon receiving a recommendation from the Planning Commission, may adopt, reject, or modify all general plan or general plan map amendments. 17.1786.050 Procedures Commented [HB18]: This sections provides the method for future amendments to the General Plan. Edits improve readability and establish ability to amend the General Plan Land Use map Page 818 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 93 of 95 B. Application. Applications for General Plan Amendment shall be filed with the Community Development Department on the prescribed application forms prescribed by the Director.pursuant to Section TBD, Application Forms and Fees and Section TBD Review of Applications. The application for a General Plan Amendment shall include data or other evidence in support of the applicable findings required by Section TBD, Required Findings. C. Public Hearing and Notice. All amendments to the General Plan and General Plan Land Use Map shall be referred to the Planning Commission, which shall conduct at least one public hearing on any proposed amendment prior to submitting a recommendation report to the City Council. At least ten (10)20 days before the date of any public hearing, the City shall provide notice as provided for in Section 17.03.050 (Public Notice).Section TBD, Public Notice. D. Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation. Before submitting a recommendation to the City Council, the Planning Commission shall conduct at least one public hearing. E. Recommendation to City Council. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation on the proposed amendment to the City Council. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the recommendation, findings related to General Plan consistency, and a discussion of the relationship of the proposed amendment to other adopted documents. The recommendation shall be transmitted to the City Council with a copy of the approved minutes from the Planning Commission hearing. 1. Approval. If the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed amendment, the City Council is required to take final action. pursuant to Section TBD, City Council Hearing and Action. 2. Denial. If the Planning Commission has recommended against the proposed amendment, the City Council is not required to take any further action unless an appeal is filed in accordance with Section 17.03.120 (Appeals and Calls for Review).Section TBD, Appeals and Calls for Review. Page 819 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 94 of 95 3. Reapplication Upon Denial. After the denial of a Geneal Plan Amendment has become final, no further application for the same General Plan Amendment shall be filed for the ensuing 12 months, unless the project is revised to resolve the review authority’s previous objections to the project. a. Determination if the new application has resolved the review authority’s previous objections shall be made by the Director. b. Said revision shall require a new application process and payment of fee. F. City Council Hearing and Action. 1. City Council Hearing. After receiving the recommendation from the Planning Commission, the City Council shall hold a hearing in accordance with Section 17.03.060 (Conduct of Public Hearings) Section TBD, Conduct of Public Hearings. The notice for the hearing shall include a summary of the Planning Commission recommendation. 2. City Council Action. After the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may approve, modify, or deny the proposed amendment. If the Council proposes any substantial revision not previously considered by the Planning Commission during its hearings, the proposed revision shall first be referred to the Planning Commission for report and recommendation, but the Planning Commission shall not be required to hold a public hearing. The failure of the Planning Commission to report within 45 days after the referral shall be deemed a recommendation for approval and the amendment shall be returned to Council for adoption. 17.1786.060 Required Findings A. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city, as specified under Government Code Section 65358(as); Page 820 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 95 of 95 B. That adoption of the proposed General Plan amendment will not exceed the annual limit on amendments specified under Government Code Section 65358(b); and C. The amendment is consistent with the intent of the vision, goals and objectives, and policies of the General Plan and internally consistent. Page 821 of 1339 ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (24-01): TITLE 17 OF THE HBMC PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES City Council Meeting –May 26, 2026 Page 822 of 1339 Request •Conduct the public hearing •Consider the amendments •Find action is exempt from CEQA •Introduce ordinance Page 823 of 1339 IN-THE-ZONE •PLAN Hermosa –2017 •Assessment –2020 •Update zoning code to be: o User-friendly o Implement the community’s vision o Consistent with State law Page 824 of 1339 Background Release of Assessment May 2020 Planning Commission Hearing May 2024 City Council Hearing Page 825 of 1339 Administrative Procedures Ministerial: Permits that do not require any discretion. Administrative: Uses that have a low potential to create an impact. Entitlement:Uses that have a higher potential to create an impact. Legislative:Changes to regulations or policies. Page 826 of 1339 Administrative Procedures Ministerial: Permits that do not require any discretion. Administrative: Uses that have a low potential to create an impact. Entitlement:Uses that have a higher potential to create an impact. Legislative:Changes to regulations or policies. Page 827 of 1339 Administrative Procedures Ministerial: Permits that do not require any discretion. Administrative: Uses that have a low potential to create an impact. Entitlement:Uses that have a higher potential to create an impact. Legislative:Changes to regulations or policies. Page 828 of 1339 Administrative Procedures Ministerial: Permits that do not require any discretion. Administrative: Uses that have a low potential to create an impact. Entitlement:Uses that have a higher potential to create an impact. Legislative:Changes to regulations or policies. Page 829 of 1339 Ministerial Process Page 830 of 1339 Ministerial Process MINISTERIAL •ADUs/JADUs •SB 9 units •Single Family Homes •Small Structures ≤1,500 s.f. •Small Remodels ≤3,000 s.f. •Residential with 20% affordable units Page 831 of 1339 Administrative Process Page 832 of 1339 Administrative Process ADMINISTRATIVE •Administrative Permits •Limited outdoor seating •Temporary Use Permits •Short Term Vacation Rentals •Temporary Signs •Minor Precise Development Plans •Minor Use Permit •Convex Slope Determinations •Zoning & Similar Use Interpretation Page 833 of 1339 Entitlement Process Page 834 of 1339 Entitlement Process ENTITLEMENT •Conditional Use Permits •Variances •Major Precise Development Plans •Parking Plans •Certificate of Appropriateness Page 835 of 1339 Legislative Process Page 836 of 1339 Legislative Process LEGISLATIVE •General Plan Amendments •Zoning Amendments •Specific Plans •Development Agreements Page 837 of 1339 Environmental Determination •Project is exempt from the California Quality Act (CEQA) •CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) Page 838 of 1339 Public Noticing •Legal ad published in the Easy Reader on May 26, 2026, as 1/8 page ad. Page 839 of 1339 Staff Recommendation •Conduct a public hearing to consider the proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code pertaining to the Administrative Procedures; •Find that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines; and •Introduce by title only and waive first reading of an Ordinance (Attachment 1) of the City of Hermosa Beach approving the Zone Text Amendment (TA24-01). Page 840 of 1339 •Contact us. Alexis Oropeza, Planning Manager (310) 318-0241 aoropeza@hermosabeach.gov THANK YOU! Page 841 of 1339 Code Amendments 1.Chapter 17.01 (Introductory Provisions) – This chapter establishes the City’s authority to regulate zoning and clarifies the applicability of the zoning regulations. 2.Chapter 17.02 (Zoning Review Authorities) – This chapter specifies the review authority (Director, Planning Commission, City Council) for the various land use applications. 3.Chapter 17.03 (Administrative Procedures) – Administrative procedures established in this chapter include application requirements, review periods, public noticing, appeals, conduct of public hearings, and revisions, revocations, and expirations to approved entitlements. Additionally, this chapter establishes procedures to formally interpret the provisions of the zoning ordinance. 4.Section 17.04.040 (General Definitions) – The proposed amendment would add three new definitions into the existing list of definitions within the zoning ordinance. This includes defining the “Director”, “Building Official”, and “Ministerial Review” in context of implementing zoning regulations. 5.Chapter 17.60 (Zoning Clearance) – The zoning clearance provides staff a formal method to review ministerial applications. Reviews would be limited to ensure compliance with the General Plan and municipal code. Page 842 of 1339 Code Amendments 6.Chapter 17.62 (Administrative Permit) – Administrative permits include emergency shelters, limited live entertainment uses, limited outdoor seating, low-barrier navigation centers, residential care facilities, short-term vacation rentals, supportive housing (up to 50 units), and temporary use/events. This chapter establishes the process, procedures, and findings required to act on these applications. 7.Chapter 17.64 (Temporary Use Permit) – The City Council adopted Ordinance 25-1487, updating the regulations pertaining to Temporary Uses and Temporary Events in June of 2025. These provisions make it clear that approval is issued pursuant to Administrative Permits. Staff recommends the elimination of this chapter as the procedures are covered by the proposed Administrative Permit Chapter (Chapter 17.62). 8.Chapter 17.66 (Minor Exceptions) – The minor exception process would allow small deviations to development standards that could be approved by the Community Development Director without the need for a variance. The applicability of the section was deferred for future consideration by the Planning Commission. Staff has therefore incorporated the current administrative variance. 9.Chapter 17.68 (Minor Use Permit) - Minor Use Permits are intended for uses that have the potential to create small impacts to neighboring properties. Minor use permits would be reviewed by the Director but still allow for public input Page 843 of 1339 Code Amendments 10.Chapter 17.70 (Conditional Use Permit) – While already required, conditional use permits requirements would be moved to Chapter 17.70. This chapter establishes the process, procedures, and findings required to act on these applications. 11.Chapter 17.72 (Parking Plan) – Parking plans, as currently allowed by Chapter 17.44 of the HBMC, allow the Planning Commission to reduce the required parking for a project. Chapter 17.72 formalizes the process, procedures, and findings required to act on these applications. 12.Chapter 17.74 (Precise Development Plan) – Precise development plans allow the City to review new development projects to ensure compliance with the General Plan, zoning code, and other city regulations. 13.Chapter 17.76 (Variances) - While already allowed, variance requirements would be moved to Chapter 17.76. This chapter establishes the process, procedures, and findings required to act on these applications. 14.Chapter 17.78 (Coastal Clearance) – Coastal clearances are a new requirement in the zoning ordinance. They would be required for developments in the Coastal Zone. They are intended to ensure that any changes made by the Coastal Commission still comply with the City’s codes. Page 844 of 1339 Code Amendments 15.Chapter 17.80 (Development Agreements) – The provisions are already included in the zoning ordinance but would be moved to Chapter 17.80. This chapter establishes the process, procedures, and findings required to act on these applications. 16.Chapter 17.82 (Specific Plans) – Chapter 17.38 of the HBMC currently contains all of the specific plans within the City, there is no formal method to amend or approve new specific plans other than what is contained in State law. Chapter 17.82 would complement the Specific Plans listed in Chapter 17.38 by establishing local processes, procedures, and findings to adopt a new specific plan or amend any of the existing specific plans. The Planning Commission would provide a recommendation to the City Council, who would make the final decision. 17.Chapter 17.84 (Zoning Amendments) – Chapter 17.84 establishes the formal process to amend the zoning ordinance. The Planning Commission would provide a recommendation to the City Council, who would make the final decision. 18.Chapter 17.86 (General Plan Amendment) – Chapter 17.86 establishes the formal process to amend the City’s general plan. The Planning Commission would provide a recommendation to the City Council, who would make the final decision. Page 845 of 1339 I support this ordinance. After more than 40 years without a comprehensive update to the City’s zoning procedures, this effort is long overdue, and I appreciate the years of work by staff, the Planning Commission, and the many stakeholders who contributed to getting it here. That said, I believe a few targeted refinements would make this a substantially stronger ordinance — one that better serves residents, property owners, and small businesses – – and that matches the spirit of the City’s own stated goals of timely, predictable, and measurable permitting. 1. Precise Development Plans for Code-Compliant Housing and Mixed-Use Projects I support staff recommendations to create a “Minor PDP” that routes condos and small mixed-use in a more appropriate process. Currently every condo and every mixed-use project in Hermosa Beach — regardless of size, and regardless of whether it fully complies with city code — is required to obtain a “Major” Precise Development Plan. This means a staff report, a public hearing before the Planning Commission, applicant fees, and months of added delay, even when the project raises no policy questions and deviates from nothing in the code. This adds a negative impact to all parties with no positive effect. The data speaks for itself. Over the last 24 months, the Planning Commission has not once denied a code-compliant Condo/Mixed-use PDP. I can not count how many times I have heard Pete Hoffman say at a Planning Commission hearing “It checks all the boxes. We can’t deny it.” A guaranteed delay with a predetermined outcome is not oversight. It is process burden imposed on residents and property owners who have already done everything the City asked of them. Recommendation: Follow staff recommendation that condos and mixed-use projects that meet 100% of objective standards and seek no variance or deviation are approved at the Director-level. Full appeal rights to the Planning Commission are preserved, but a mandatory public hearing for a project that complies with everything in the code is not appropriate. If the code is objective, the review should be administrative. 2. Dormancy-Based Permit Revocation Should Be Struck All-together The proposed ordinance would allow a permit to be revoked if a use has been dormant for more than 12 consecutive months. I am asking the Council to strike this provision entirely. Most people view a vacant storefront as a problem to be solved. I’d ask Council to consider a different frame: almost every vacant commercial space in this city is actively going through something. Cleaning up. Finding a tenant. Pulling permits. Waiting on the Coastal Commission. Negotiating a lease. Working through financing. Managing insurance or ADA compliance issues. The transition is rarely visible from the street — but that does not mean it isn’t happening. Page 846 of 1339 Consider the Becker building, which many of you know. Don English had tenants and wanted to make a transition that should have been straightforward. But once the project entered the regulatory process — Planning Commission routing, solar requirements, and California ADA elevator requirements — each layer added months. What should have been a manageable transition became years of vacancy. That building was not abandoned. It was stuck. And no revocation clock would have helped — it would only have added pressure and uncertainty to an owner already navigating a complex system. Furthermore, tenanting a commercial property is a completely different animal to residential property. Lenders and investors build extended vacancy periods into every deal they underwrite. Standard lease-up assumptions are 6 to 12 months for office, 8 to 12-plus months for retail, and 12 to 24 months for stabilized occupancy in new or significantly vacant buildings. These are not failure scenarios — they are normal market transitions. When commercial properties are finally tenanted, the leases are typically 5-10yrs, or longer, so getting the right tenant is important. The answer to vacancy is not a penalty. The answer is a system that allows smoother transitions. The City already has code enforcement tools to address genuinely abandoned or nuisance properties. A new dormancy-based revocation trigger is not needed for that purpose — and its reach goes well beyond it. Recommendation: Strike §17.03.110(C)(3) in its entirety. 3. Parking Plans — Create a Tiered Review Process As written, all Parking Plans are reviewed by the Planning Commission. This is disproportionate and discourages reinvestment in small local events, and older, small commercial buildings where parking is already one of the biggest barriers to tenant improvements, adaptive reuse, and storefront activation. A small downtown lot with eight parking spaces is not a policy question. It is arithmetic. Routing that kind of routine adjustment through a Planning Commission hearing adds months of delay and cost to projects that need neither. Recommendation: Establish a tiered Parking Plan process. Director-level review should be available for routine plans: restriping, shared parking arrangements, small changes of use, modest parking adjustments, and managed parking for smaller events and commercial lots. Planning Commission review should be reserved for major parking reductions, large new development, removal of public parking, or situations involving unresolved policy questions. This preserves Commission oversight where it genuinely matters while removing unnecessary process burden from straightforward cases. Entitlement Expiration — Allow Exercise of Permit Entitlements can expire before financing is secured, before Coastal Commission review is complete, or before plan check and tenant improvement work can commence. For applicants who are diligently pursuing a project, this can mean going back through a full Page 847 of 1339 hearing for an approval that everyone agreed was appropriate — just because the timeline slipped due to factors outside their control. I recommend adding an “Exercise of Permit” provision for substantially unchanged approvals where the applicant can demonstrate diligent pursuit. An exercised permit should not require construction commencement as its only metric of progress. I hope my comments are helpful and considered seriously. Other than one item (revocation due to dormancy) I strongly support staff recommendations, with minor tweaks. The refinements I have outlined are not objections to the overall effort in any way but an invitation to go a little further and match the level of review to the level of judgment actually required. A streamlined, predictable process is a win for all stakeholders! Best Regards Jon David Page 848 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 12 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-AS-061 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FY 2026-2027 BUDGET PRESENTATIONS: REVENUE OPTIONS (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Receive and File Department Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 -2027 Budget Presentations; and 2. Provide direction on a preferred approach to addressing revenue enhancements to minimize impacts to community services. Executive Summary: The FY 2026–2027 structural budget deficit has been preliminarily addressed through expenditure adjustments designed to maintain balanced operations while minimizing impacts to filled staff positions and community services. While these actions addressed the immediate FY27 deficit, the City continues to face significant long-term fiscal pressures, including rising Los Angeles County contract costs for fire services, lifeguards, and beach maintenance, as well as substantial unfunded infrastructure and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) needs. As a result, this report focuses on potential revenue enhancement strategies intended to improve long-term fiscal sustainability, reduce reliance on service reductions, preserve core community services, and establish more stable ongoing funding sources for infrastructure, public safety, and operational needs. Revenue options presented for City Council consideration include modifications to the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), including potential expansion of the TOT base and rate adjustments, a potential local sales tax measure, expanded parking and mobility revenue strategies, and other locally controlled funding opportunities. These options are intended to diversify and stabilize the City’s revenue structure, redu ce reliance on one-time budget solutions, better align visitor-generated impacts with revenue generation, and provide additional funding capacity to address ongoing operational, infrastructure, and public safety needs. Page 849 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 12 Background: At the May 12, 2026 City Council meeting, departmental FY 2026–2027 budget overviews and a preliminary strategy to address the City’s projected $3.2 million structural deficit were presented to the City Council. The presentation included a high -level review of departmental operations, service priorities, and potential reduction scenarios developed to prepare for ongoing fiscal uncertainty and rising long-term costs. The presentation explained that the City has relied on one-time funding solutions over the past five years to address a growing imbalance between revenues and expenditures. However, increasing employee-related expenses, contractual obligations, and operational costs have made this approach unsustainable. The structural deficit is currently estimated at approximately $3.2 million, largely driven by rising labor and contract costs. To preliminarily balance the FY27 budget while minimizing impacts to staffing and core services, the proposed strategy includes approximately $2 .0 million in delayed contributions to the Equipment Replacement Fund and deferred vehicle and fleet-related purchases and maintenance funding. The plan also reduces planned reserve contributions by approximately $1.1 million, lowering the General Fund reserve level from its 20% target to approximately 18%, which remains above the Government Finance Officers Association best-practice recommendation of 16%. The proposed FY27 budget will also include targeted departmental expenditure reductions and operational efficiencies intended to minimize imp acts to staffing and community services. These measures include approximately $271,000 in projected vacancy savings achieved through the elimination, reclassification, or continued vacancy of select positions and along with other administrative cost-saving measures. Proposed measures are intended to align expenditures with current fiscal conditions while preserving core municipal services to the greatest extent possible. The City continues to face broader long-term financial challenges, including rising County contract costs, contractual obligations, and unfunded capital and infrastructure needs. Departments have evaluated additional reduction scenarios to prepare for future economic pressures and operational constraints. The recommended departmental reductions are expected to provide approximately $1.08 million in ongoing budgetary relief. Additional details regarding proposed reductions and associated savings will be included in the City Manager’s Proposed FY27 Budget for City Council consideration. Page 850 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 12 Department Proposed FY 27 Reduction Strategy Estimated Approximate Savings Administrative Services Eliminate HR intern position, downgrade HR Analyst position, and reduce operational/administrative support capacity. $230,000 City Clerk Leave Senior Office Assistant position unfilled and defunded, expand technology/digital workflow efficiencies to maintain service levels where possible. $116,000 City Manager’s Office Communications/community engagement support, and training. $75,000 Community Development Eliminate a vacant intern position while maintaining core mandated functions. $21,000 Parks & Recreation Operational efficiencies through software transition, targeted reductions in materials/advertising/training, and part-time scheduling efficiencies. $150,000 Police Reduce conferences/training and contract services for both the Police and Community Services Division. $270,000 Public Works Reduce maintenance contract services, supplemental maintenance requests, deferred fleet replacement, conferences / training, and beautification-related expenditures. $224,000 Estimated Total: $1.08 Million Following discussion, City Council directed staff to move forward with recommended FY27 budget reduction strategies that avoid impacts to filled staff positions and minimize direct impacts to community services. Accordingly, this report focuses on potential revenue enhancement strategies for City Council consideration, including Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) modifications, short - term rental (STR) compliance and enforcement, a potential local sales tax measure, parking and mobility revenue strategies, and other locally controlled revenue options intended to support long-term fiscal sustainability and reduce reliance on one-time budget solutions. Page 851 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 12 Past Board, Commission, and Council Actions Meeting Date Description March 24, 2026 City Council received an initial overview of the FY27 budget framework and provided direction to address an emerging structural deficit through a mix of revenue and expenditure strategies. April 28, 2026 City Council reviewed the FY27 fiscal outlook, including a projected ~$3.2M deficit, and the need to shift from one-time solutions to long-term structural balance. May 12, 2026 City Council reviewed departmental FY27 budget presentations, received an overview of proposed expenditure reduction scenarios and long-term fiscal challenges, and directed staff to proceed with budget balancing strategies that minimize impacts to filled positions and community services. Analysis: The FY 2026–2027 structural budget deficit has been preliminarily addressed through expenditure adjustments designed to maintain balanced operations while minimizing impacts to filled staff positions and community services. While these actions addressed the immediate FY27 deficit, the City continues to face significant long-term fiscal pressures, including rising Los Angeles County contract costs for fire services, lifeguards, and beach maintenance, as well as substantial unfunded infrastructure and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) needs. As a result, this report focuses on potential revenue enhancement strategies intended to improve long-term fiscal sustainability, reduce reliance on service reductions, preserve core community services, and establish more stable ongoing funding sources for infrastructure, public safety, and operational needs. Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Rate Adjustments City Council may consider increasing the City’s existing 14% Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) rate to better align with regional tourism markets and help capture additional visitor- generated revenue. A 1 percentage-point increase in the TOT rate is estimated to generate approximately $364,000 annually in additional General Fund revenue, assuming current lodging activity levels remain consistent. As regional tourism activity is expected to increase significantly in advance of major international events such as the 2026 FIFA World Cup and 2028 Olympic Games, several neighboring and tourism - oriented jurisdictions throughout Los Angeles County are evaluating or pursuing TOT increases to support infrastructure, public safety, transportation, and visitor-related service demands. Given Hermosa Beach’s strong coastal tourism economy and limited ability to generate new development-related revenue, a TOT rate adjustment represents one of the City’s Page 852 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 12 most direct opportunities to increase locally controlled revenue from visitors rather than residents. Additional TOT revenue could help offset growing public safety, beach maintenance, parking management, and infrastructure costs associated with increased tourism and special event activity, while also reducing reliance on operational reductions and one-time funding solutions. Pros:  Primarily impacts visitors rather than residents  Captures increased tourism activity tied to World Cup and Olympic-related travel  Generates locally controlled General Fund revenue  Helps offset beach, public safety, and visitor-related operational costs Cons:  Requires voter approval  Higher lodging costs could impact competitiveness relative to neighboring cities  Potential resistance from hospitality operators and tourism stakeholders  Revenue remains sensitive to tourism and economic downturns Short-Term Rental (STR) Compliance & Enforcement In addition to potential TOT rate adjustments, the City may further expand and strengthen enforcement of the existing TOT base related to short-term rental (STR) activity. Enhanced STR compliance and enforcement efforts could include increased auditing, registration requirements, enforcement coordination with hosting platforms, and collection of unpaid TOT and business license taxes associated with short -term rental operations. As identified during the FY27 fiscal outlook study session, enhanced STR compliance efforts could generate significant one-time retroactive collections estimated at up to approximately $5 million, with ongoing annual revenue potential of approximately $1 million. Given Hermosa Beach’s high concentration of visitor accommodations and STR demand, ensuring full collection of both TOT and business license taxes would improve equity among lodging operators, strengthen enforcement of existing municipal regulations, and provide additional locally controlled revenue to offset visitor -related impacts on public safety, beach operations, parking demand, and infrastructure maintenance without directly burdening residents. In parallel with compliance and enforcement efforts, City staff will continue working toward obtaining a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) and establishing a permanent short -term rental program and operational guidelines intended to provide clearer regulatory standards, improve compliance, and create a more consistent long-term framework for STR operations within the City. Page 853 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 6 of 12 Pros:  Significant near-term and ongoing revenue potential  Improves compliance and fairness among lodging operators  Helps address neighborhood impacts associated with STR activity  Captures existing revenue currently uncollected Cons:  Requires ongoing enforcement staffing and administrative resources  Revenue may fluctuate depending on market conditions and enforcement success Local Sales Tax Measure City Council may also consider pursuing a local sales tax measure to diversify the City’s revenue structure and provide a more stable ongoing funding source for essential City services and infrastructure. Based on current taxable sales activity within Hermosa Beach, each quarter-cent increase is estimated to generate approximately $1 million annually. Given the City’s regional draw for dining, entertainment, and beach tourism, a local sales tax measure would allow a larger portion of visitor and regional consumer spending to support ongoing City operations and infrastructure needs. Revenue generated through a sales tax measure could help fund public safety operations, street and facility maintenance, beach-related services, and long-term capital improvements while reducing reliance on one-time funding solutions and operational reductions. Any sales tax increase would require voter approval. Pros:  Broad and stable revenue source tied to tourism and visitor spending  Generates significant ongoing unrestricted revenue  Helps diversify revenue beyond property tax and TOT  Allows visitors to contribute toward City services and infrastructure Cons:  Requires voter approval  Potential concern from local businesses regarding consumer impacts  Revenue can decline during economic slowdowns or reduced tourism activity  May contribute to cumulative regional sales tax increases Parking & Mobility Revenue Strategies Additional revenue opportunities include expanded parking and mobility revenue strategies, including dynamic parking pricing in beach and downtown areas, peak pricing during weekends, holidays, summer months, and special events, expanded parking meter Page 854 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 7 of 12 programs, updated parking permit programs, and enhanced parking enforcement technology. Given Hermosa Beach’s limited parking supply, high visitor deman d, and significant seasonal activity, these strategies are intended not only to generate additional locally controlled revenue, but also to improve parking turnover, traffic circulation, and beach access management in high-demand areas. Potential strategies for City Council consideration include accelerating the City’s previously adopted parking citation rate schedule to realize the full increase by October 2026 rather than October 2027, which is estimated to generate approximately $250,000 in additional annual revenue increasing late payment penalty amounts from the current $30 flat rate to either a higher fixed amount or up to 100% of the original citation fine, which could generate an estimated $100,000 to $200,000 annually depending on collection rates and citation volume. and reevaluating the City’s current holiday parking program by reducing free holiday parking from three weeks to two weeks or eliminating the program entirely, with additional parking revenue of approximately $60,000 to $200,000 annually These measures are intended to improve cost recovery, encourage parking turnover, and align parking management practices with current operational and enforcement costs. Options  Accelerate increase in parking citation rates fully by October 2026:  Increase $30 late parking citation penalty fee to 100% of original fine amount:  Eliminate/reduce holiday parking program : Additional operational strategies may include expanding the use of yellow -pole metered parking in high-demand coastal and commercial areas, including corridors impacted by beach activity, downtown visitation, and special events. Expanded metering could provide additional revenue generation opportunities while helping improve parking availability and reducing long-term vehicle storage in premium parking areas. Depending on the number of additional metered spaces installed and utilization levels, expanded parking meter operations could generate up to approximately $2 million annually in additional revenue. Potential expansion areas may include Monterey Boulevard, Manhattan Avenue, and other high-utilization corridors where parking demand and visitor impacts are greatest. Because portions of these areas are located within or adjacent to the California Coastal Zone, certain parking modifications, pricing changes, meter installations, or related operational changes may also require review and approval by the California Coastal Commission. Options  Expand yellow-pole meters throughout the 1 hr parking zones along Manhattan Ave, Monterey Blvd., and connecting cross streets: Page 855 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 8 of 12 The City may also consider implementing dynamic pricing models within beach parking lots and other high-demand parking facilities during peak demand periods such as summer weekends, holidays, and special events. Dynamic pricing strategies would allow parking rates to better reflect actual demand conditions, similar to other coastal and tourism-oriented communities, while providing the City with a scalable and flexible revenue source that can be adjusted over time based on operational needs, visitor activity, and parking utilization trends. Based on the City’s estimate that each $0.25 per hour increase in parking rates generates approximately $375,000 annually in additional revenue, dynamic pricing could generate substantially more revenue depending on the level and duration of peak-season rate adjustments implemented. While implementation may require upfront investment in parking technology and management systems, these strategies could generate meaningful ongoing revenue while improving parking efficiency and visitor access management throughout the City. Options  Use dynamic pricing to better reflect supply/demand for parking in commercial areas: Pros:  Locally controlled and scalable revenue source  Primarily impacts visitors and non-residents  Helps improve parking turnover and beach access management  Flexible pricing can better manage seasonal demand and special events Cons:  Potential public concern regarding increased parking costs and citations  Could impact visitor perception and local business concerns regarding accessibility  Requires upfront investment in parking technology and infrastructure  Expanded enforcement and metering may face neighborhood resistance Assessment District Modernization The City may evaluate modernization of existing landscaping and street lighting assessment districts, which have not been comprehensively updated since approximately 1996 and currently require an estimated annual General Fund subsidy of approximately $400,000 due to rising maintenance and operational costs o utpacing assessment revenues. Modernizing these assessments could help establish a more sustainable funding source for neighborhood landscaping, lighting, and related maintenance services while reducing ongoing pressure on the General Fund. However, any increase would require a Page 856 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 9 of 12 Proposition 218 process and property owner approval, making this both a legally constrained and policy-sensitive option for City Council consideration. Pros:  Reduces General Fund subsidy pressures  Creates dedicated funding for neighborhood maintenance services  Better aligns service costs with benefiting properties Cons:  Requires Proposition 218 voter approval process  Directly impacts property owners and residents  Historically sensitive and potentially difficult to achieve community support Stormwater & Environmental Funding The City may also consider updating stormwater-related fees to address ongoing General Fund subsidies currently estimated at approximately $700,000 annually. Existing stormwater fees have not kept pace with increasing regulatory compliance requirements, environmental mandates, coastal water quality obligations, and infrastructure maintenance costs. As coastal infrastructure and environmental compliance costs continue to increase, establishing a more sustainable and dedicated funding source could help reduce structural General Fund pressures while supporting long-term stormwater infrastructure maintenance, environmental compliance, and coastal resiliency efforts. Similar to assessment adjustments, updated stormwater fees would require a Proposition 218 process and potentially voter approval depending on the structure of the proposed funding mechanism. Pros:  Establishes dedicated environmental and infrastructure funding source  Reduces ongoing General Fund subsidies  Supports coastal compliance and resiliency requirements Cons:  Directly impacts residents and property owners  Requires Proposition 218 voter approval process  May face community concerns regarding affordability and cumulative fee increases City Assets & Other Local Revenue Opportunities Additional locally controlled revenue opportunities may include optimizing City-owned assets through leases, partnerships, concession agreements, or redevelopment Page 857 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 10 of 12 opportunities to better align City property usage with long-term revenue generation goals. Potential opportunities may include underutilized public properties, parking-related assets, and strategically located commercial or mixed-use sites that could generate recurring lease or operational revenue. The City may also evaluate opportunities to maximize long-term economic activity through targeted land use and development strategies, including encouraging high -value commercial, hospitality, dining, and experiential uses that reinforce Hermosa Beach’s coastal visitor economy and increase property, sales, and tourism tax generation over time. Long-term policy considerations may also include targeted redevelopment or zoning adjustments in appropriate corridors to support economic vitality and sustainable revenue growth. Pros:  Creates long-term locally controlled recurring revenue  Potentially increases economic activity and property values  Leverages existing City assets without broad tax increases  Supports long-term economic vitality and tourism economy Cons:  May involve significant community and land use policy discussions  Development and redevelopment opportunities can be time -intensive Potential neighborhood concerns regarding density, traffic, and coastal character  Revenue generation may not occur in the near term due to entitlement and development timelines Option Description Potential Revenue 1. Increase TOT $364,000 per 1% 2. Increase sales tax up to 1% $1 million per ¼% or $4 million per 1% 3. Fully implement parking citation increases in 2026 $250,000 4. Increase fee for late parking citation payment $100,000-$200,00 5. Eliminate/reduce holiday parking program $60,000-$200,000 6. Meter 1hr impact zone streets Up to $2 million 7. Implement dynamic pricing for parking $375,0000+ 8. Increase fees for lighting and landscaping districts $400,000 +/- 9. Establish new fee for stormwater discharge $800.000 +/- 10. Increase rents for city assets and explore development opportunities Unkown—subject to negotiations Page 858 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 11 of 12 Options for Council Consideration: Based on the City’s long-term fiscal outlook and ongoing structural funding needs, City Council may consider the following options related to potential revenue enhancement strategies: 1. Receive and file the report and provide general policy direction regarding preferred revenue strategies. 2. Direct staff to further evaluate potential Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) rate adjustments and short-term rental (STR) compliance and enforcement measures, including business license tax collection and deve lopment of a permanent STR program. 3. Direct staff to evaluate a potential local sales tax measure, including ballot timing, community outreach, and revenue projections. 4. Direct staff to further analyze parking and mobility revenue strategies, including dynamic pricing, expanded metering, citation and penalty adjustments, and holiday parking program modifications. 5. Direct staff to evaluate additional long-term funding opportunities, including assessment district modernization, stormwater fee updates, and opt imization of City-owned assets and redevelopment opportunities. 6. Direct staff to return with implementation plans, financial analysis, public outreach strategies, and any required legal or voter approval processes associated with selected revenue options. Fiscal Impact: Implementation of the revenue enhancement strategies discussed in this report could generate several million dollars in ongoing and one -time General Fund revenues to help address the City’s long-term structural fiscal challenges, rising County contract costs, and unfunded infrastructure and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) needs. Potential revenue opportunities include approximately $1 million annually and up to $5 million in one-time collections related to short-term rental (STR) compliance and enforcement, approximately $1 million annually for each quarter -cent local sales tax increase, additional revenues from potential Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) rate adjustments, parking and mobility revenue enhancements estimated in the hundreds of thousands to low millions annually depending on implementation, approximately $400,000 annually in reduced General Fund subsidies through assessment district modernization, and approximately $700,000 annually through updated stormwater funding mechanisms. Several revenue options may require voter approval, Proposition 218 proceedings, Coastal Commission approvals, or upfront implementation costs related to administration, technology, enforcement, or consulting services. However, these strategies are intended Page 859 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 12 of 12 to improve long-term fiscal sustainability, reduce reliance on one-time funding solutions, and preserve core community services. Attachments: None Respectfully Submitted by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 860 of 1339 FY 27 BUDGET REVENUE OPTIONS MAY 26, 2026 Page 861 of 1339 FY27 Fiscal Outlook •Approximate $3.2 million structural deficit •Rising labor and operational costs •Increasing County contract service costs •Growing infrastructure and CIP funding needs •Maintain balanced operations while minimizing impacts to staff and services Page 862 of 1339 Preliminary Budget Balancing Actions Deferred Equipment Replacement Fund contributions Delayed fleet purchases and maintenance Reduced reserve contributions Departmental operational reductions Approximately $1.08 million in ongoing savings Page 863 of 1339 Proposed FY 26-27 Reductions Department Reduction Summary Administrative Services –$230K City Clerk –$116K City Manager –$75K Community Development –$21K Parks & Recreation –$150K Police –$270K Public Works –$224K Total Estimated Savings: ~$1.08 Million Page 864 of 1339 Why Revenue Enhancements Are Needed •Ongoing structural budget imbalance •Rising operational & infrastructure costs •Increasing visitor-related service demands •Limited long-term revenue growth •Preserve services and improve long-term sustainability Page 865 of 1339 Revenue Enhancement Categories Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Short-Term Rental (STR) Compliance Local Sales Tax Measure Parking & Mobility Revenue Assessment District Modernization Stormwater & Environmental Fees City Asset Optimization & Development Page 866 of 1339 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) •Current TOT Rate: 14% •~$364,000 annually per 1% increase •Primarily impacts visitors •Supports public safety & beach operations •Requires voter approval Page 867 of 1339 Short-Term Rental (STR) Compliance •Enhanced audits & registration requirements •Collection of unpaid taxes •Permanent STR program development •Up to ~$5 million one-time collections •~$1 million annually ongoing Page 868 of 1339 Local Sales Tax Measure •~$1 million annually per ¼-cent increase •Up to ~$4 million annually for 1% •Broad and stable revenue source •Visitor contribution to City services •Requires voter approval Page 869 of 1339 Parking & Mobility Revenue Strategies •Dynamic pricing for beach & downtown parking •Expanded parking meter programs •Citation & late fee adjustments •Holiday parking modifications •Expanded metering up to ~$2M •Dynamic pricing ~$375K+ Page 870 of 1339 Assessment District Modernization •Districts not updated since ~1996 •~$400K annual General Fund subsidy •Dedicated maintenance funding •Requires Proposition 218 process •Property owner approval required Page 871 of 1339 Stormwater & Environmental Funding •~$700K annual General Fund subsidy •Increasing environmental compliance costs •Supports coastal resiliency efforts •Dedicated environmental funding source •Requires Proposition 218 process Page 872 of 1339 City Assets & Economic Development •Lease optimization •Public-private partnerships •Development opportunities •Increase recurring revenues •Balance economic growth with community character and coastal access Page 873 of 1339 Revenue Options Summary Table Page 874 of 1339 Council Consideration Options Evaluate TOT adjustments Expand STR enforcement Analyze local sales tax measure Further study parking strategies Explore assessment/stormwater updates Return with implementation plans Page 875 of 1339 Recommended Next Steps Receive & file report Provide policy direction Prioritize preferred revenue strategies Direct staff on implementation analysis & outreach Page 876 of 1339 FY 27 BUDGET REVENUE OPTIONS MAY 26, 2026 Page 877 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 11 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PR-027 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL EVENT POLICY GUIDE AND FEE UPDATES (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Consider approval of the proposed Special Event Policy Guide and fee updates outlined in the staff report; and 2. Consider the amendments proposed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission outlined in the staff report. Executive Summary: Staff conducted a comprehensive review of the City’s Special Events Policy Guide (Attachment 1) and associated fee structure and identified potential policy modifications and fee updates to improve clarity, consistency, administrative efficiency, and cost recovery. The proposed changes are intended to support the continued delivery of high - quality community events while more effectively managing public resources. Background: The Parks and Recreation Department is tasked with overseeing special events on public property. The City’s Special Events Policy Guide (Attachment 1) provides event producers with detailed information regarding application requirements, review and approval procedures, applicable fees, relevant policies, and Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) provisions related to special events. Events are evaluated using the Impact Characteristics Matrix and classified as Impact Level I, II, or III. Following staff’s comprehensive review of the Special Events Policy Guide (Attachment 1), staff presented policy and fee updates to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (Commission) at its April 16, 2026, meeting. The Commission recommended that City Council approve the proposed Special Event Policy Guide and associated fee updates, with consideration of the Commission’s feedback as outlined in the staff report. Page 878 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 11 Past Commission Actions Meeting Date Description Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission April 16, 2026 The Commission recommended City Council approval of Special Event Policy Guide and fee updates with proposed amendments. Discussion: Included as (Attachment 2) is an updated proposed Special Events Policy Guide incorporating staff’s proposed recommendations. The revised document also reorganizes and consolidates content to improve clarity, readability, and overall usability for both event producers and City staff. Below is a summary of the proposed policy modifications. Special Event Approval Guidelines Under the current policy, application deadlines and approval processes vary based on event classification (Impact Levels I, II, or III) and whether an event is new or returning. New events classified as Impact Level I or II are required to submit applications at least 90 days in advance, and new events classified as Impact Level III are required to submit applications by July 30 for the following calendar year. Any new event, regardless of its Impact Level, must be reviewed by both the Commission and City Council through a public hearing. Staff proposes modifying the policy to require new events to submit applications at least 90 days in advance, regardless of Impact Level. New events would still be subject to be reviewed by the Commission and City Council, but through Matters for Commission Consideration and Municipal Matters for City Council. Staff also proposes modifying the policy to provide the Parks and Recreation Director (Director) with the discretion to elevate events to a public hearing process based on anticipated community impact or other significant considerations, including but not limited to potential community concern, anticipated attendance, operational complexity, or policy sensitivity. Under the current policy, returning events are subject to varying deadlines and levels of review depending on their Impact Level. Returning Impact Level III events must be submitted by July 30 for the following calendar year and are subject to review by both the Commission and City Council. Returning Impact Level II events must be submitted at least 90 days in advance and are reviewed by the Commission, while returning Impact Page 879 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 11 Level I events must be submitted at least 30 days in advance and are reviewed administratively by City staff. Staff proposes simplifying this structure by establishing a consistent annual timeline, with the City initiating outreach in June to returning event producers and requesting preferred event dates by July 31 for all Impact Levels for the upcoming calendar year. Returning events would be reviewed collectively by the Commission in September, with staff presenting the proposed Special Events Calendar, inclusive of all requested returning event dates, for consideration and approval. Under this proposed approach, the Commission’s review would be limited to approval of the Special Events Calendar rather than the individual review and approval of each returning event. This represents a shift from the current practice, in which each returning event is reviewed and approved individually. Detailed event information will not be provided as part of the calendar review unless a returning event proposes significant changes fro m prior years. In such cases, as determined by the Director, the event would be presented separately for individual review and consideration by the Commission followed by City Council. Event producers who miss the July 31 deadline would be required to submit applications at least 90 days in advance of the event. Under the proposed policy, returning Impact Level III events would no longer require City Council review and approval, unless otherwise directed by City Council or elevated by staff due to significant changes proposed to the event from prior years. Overall, the proposed changes enhance clarity for event producers, promote consistency, and improve administrative efficiency for staff and event producers, while also providing greater flexibility to accommodate new event requests. Special Event Locations The current policy lists the following locations as permissible to host events:  Beach within the Commercial Zone (the beach north and south of the Pier between 10th–15th Street)  The Strand (continuous movement only)  Schumacher Plaza  Pier Plaza  Public rights-of-way  Valley Park, Clark Field, Edith Rodaway Park  Other parks reviewed on a case-by-case basis  Community Center Courtyard or Lawn Staff proposes adding that “special considerations for locations not listed above may be considered upon request.” Page 880 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 11 Staff is aware of a number of long-standing beach volleyball tournaments that occur outside of the currently permitted Commercial Zone, many of which have been held annually for decades at locations such as 8th Street, 16th–17th Street, 21st–22nd Street, 28th Street, and 29th Street. These events include co -ed, men’s, and women’s tournaments and are often tied to holidays such as Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, and seasonal weekends, and several have historical roots spanning 20 to over 60 years. Many of these tournaments are locally organized, community-driven traditions that promote recreation, social engagement, and, in several cases, charitable fundraising for local causes. However, because these locations are not currently identified as permissible event sites under the existing policy, these activities are occurring without permit. By adding language that allows for “special considerations for locations not listed above,” the City would create a mechanism to formally recognize, review, and permit these legacy events. Special Event Limits Under the current policy, limitations on special event days within the peak season (Memorial Day to Labor Day) are specific to coastal locations, including the Beach, the Strand, and Pier Plaza, with set maximums of 45 event days for Impact Level III events and 25 event days for Impact Level II and I events. Outside of the peak season, there is a monthly cap of 15 event days city-wide. The policy also limits the number of events to two on any given day citywide. Staff recommends that the maximum number of special event days be increased to 50 for Impact Level III events and that the 25-day maximum be maintained for Impact Level II and I events. Additionally, the peak season should commence on the Saturday preceding Memorial Day, in line with the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. These recommendations reflect the feedback from the Commission. Adjusting the total maximum number of Impact Level III events during the peak season would accommodate all returning events. Staff also recommends expanding the applicability of the limits citywide during the peak season, rather than limiting them to the coastal locations. A citywide approach is intended to improve clarity by establishing a single, consistent standard for special event limits rather than location-specific rules, reducing confusion for event producers, staff, and t he public. It also allows staff to more efficiently manage scheduling and coordination across all event locations, while better accounting for the cumulative demand on City resources. By aligning event limits with overall City capacity, this approach suppo rts more strategic allocation of events and helps reduce the potential for resources to be overextended, regardless of where events occur. Page 881 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 11 Fee-Waiver Grant Program Eligibility The intent of the Fee Waiver Grant Program is to support events that provide a clear and direct community benefit. Staff proposes adding eligibility criteria to specify that events offering prize pools, cash awards, or other forms of participant compensation are not eligible for fee waiver consideration. Such events may be structured as competitive or revenue-generating activities that provide a direct financial benefit to participants, teams, or affiliated organizations, rather than providing broader community benefit. Fee Waiver Grants represent a use of limited City resources and potential foregone revenue. Accordingly, staff proposes prioritizing these subsidies for events that are primarily community-serving in nature and provide broad public benefit, rather than tho se that include private financial incentives. During its review of the proposed Special Events Policy Guide and fee updates, the Commission recommended not approving staff’s recommendation pertaining to events offering prize pools, cash awards, or other form of participant compensation, as such incentives increase event participation. Staff recommends that City Council consider approval of either staff’s recommendation or the Commission’s alternative approach pertaining to this matter. The proposed Special Event Policy Guide (Attachment 2) reflects staff’s recommendation. Additionally, the Commission recommends simplifying the Fee Waiver Grant Program eligibility criteria to only include that the approved event must provide a unique benefit to the City or the community, provide a large economic impact, and a partial fee waiver would make a meaningful difference to the event producer’s ability to produce the event. Staff supports this recommendation and the change is reflected in the proposed Special Event Policy Guide (Attachment 2). LTA Program Procedures Under the current policy for the LTA program, the following steps are required to guide the development and implementation of an LTA: 1. Submittal of an LTA Application and corresponding letter to the Park s and Recreation Department demonstrating how the organization meets the criteria. 2. Review and recommendation for City Council approval by the Commission. 3. Review and approval by the City Council to begin LTA negotiations with City staff. 4. LTA negotiations and development. 5. Presentation of the final LTA to the City Council for approval. To reduce redundancy in the approval process, improve administrative efficiency, and maintain appropriate oversight by both the Commission and City Council at key decision points, staff proposes modifying this process. Specifically, staff recommends eliminating the City Council’s review and approval to initiate LTA negotiations (Step 3) and instead authorizing the Commission to provide this approval. Page 882 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 6 of 11 Under the proposed approach, the Commission would review applications and authorize staff to proceed with LTA negotiations, while City Council would retain final approval authority upon completion of negotiations. This modification preserves City Council’s ultimate oversight and decision-making authority on the final agreement. LTA Program Obligations Under the current policy for the LTA Program, organizations approved through an LTA are required to provide both a pre-event and post-event presentation to the Commission, including detailed information on anticipated attendance, event setup, and projected community impacts, as well as a follow-up on actual outcomes and event performance. Staff proposes eliminating the pre-event presentation requirement, retaining only a post- event presentation within 60 days following the event, focused on actual attendance, community impacts, and event successes and challenges. This change is intended to reduce administrative burden on staff and event producers and focus staff and Commission time on evaluating actual event outcomes rather than projections, while still maintaining accountability and oversight. Additional Commission Feedback During its review of the proposed Special Events Policy Guide and fee updates, the Commission recommended eliminating all LTA program eligibility criteria and only maintaining the criteria that an event must have been held in Hermosa Beach for a minimum of three consecutive years in order to be considered for an LTA. Staff supports this recommendation and the change is reflected in the proposed Special Event Policy Guide (Attachment 2). Additionally, the Commission recommended the removal of the “Returning or New Event” classification from the Impact Characteristic Matrix in the Special Events Policy Guide, providing justification that whether an event is returning or new, it doesn’t change the impact level of the event itself. Staff also supports this recommendation, and the change is reflected in the proposed Special Event Policy Guide (Attachment 2). Updated or Added Special Event Permit Program Fees Included in Table 1 below are staff’s proposed fee updates or additions to the Special Event Permit Program, supported by the Commission. These proposed fees are intended to support improved cost recovery, ensure equitable application of fees across event types, and more accurately reflect the staff time, coordination, and City resources required to support special events. Page 883 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 7 of 11 Table 1: Proposed Special Event Permit Program Fee Updates or Additions Proposed Fee Update or Addition Discussion Modification: Events with participant plus spectator crowds less than 500 per event day: Commercial: $300 per location, per day Nonprofit: $250 per location, per day The current fee requires event producers to submit participant rosters and applies a rate of $2 per participant for non-profit events and 30% of registration costs for commercial events. The current fee presents challenges due to the lack of verification mechanisms and does not account for the actual use of City facilities or public resource impacts. The proposed flat fee was developed based on an analysis of historical event data, including the average cost paid by event producers under the existing fee structure and reflects the goal of maintaining accessibility for smaller events. Removal: Pass-through Application: $365 “Because ‘pass-through applications’ require the same level of staff review, coordination, and permitting as standard special event applications, they do not result in reduced staff effort or cost. Removing this category ensures equitable cost recovery. Addition: Late Commercial Application: $1,204 Late Nonprofit Application: $802 Currently, there is no fee associated with late application submittals. Establishing a late application fee, with a 10% increase from the standard application fees for both commercial and nonprofit events, accounts for the additional administrative impact associated with expedited review. Late applications can require reallocation of staff resources and potential impacts on other City operations and initiatives. The proposed fee is intended to also encourage timely compliance with established application deadlines and review processes. Page 884 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 8 of 11 Proposed Fee Update or Addition Discussion Addition: Commercial LTA Application: $485 Nonprofit LTA Application: $291 Currently, there is no fee associated with submitting an application for the LTA Program. The review and approval process for LTAs requires a significant investment of staff time and resources, including application review, preparation of staff reports, Commission presentations, negotiation of agreement terms, preparation of agreements for City Council approval, and ongoing coordination and oversight. Establishing an LTA application fee would support cost recovery for the administrative and professional staff time required to manage the full lifecycle of the LTA process, while ensuring that applicants contribute proportionately to the resources required to evaluate and implement these agreements. Addition: Reserved Parking Staging: $207 Currently, there is no fee associated with the staff time and materials required to implement temporary parking restrictions for events. This work includes the preparation, posting, monitoring, and removal of “No Parking” signage. Establishing a staging fee would reflect the average staff time, materials, and logistical coordination required to implement reserved parking and staging areas, and would ensure appropriate cost recovery for these services. Page 885 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 9 of 11 Proposed Fee Update or Addition Discussion Addition: Event Modification: $114 Currently, there is no fee associated with event modifications requested after initial approval. Event producers may request changes such as additional event days, modifications to event scope, or date changes, which require staff to update internal systems, calendars, permits, and coordinate with multiple departments and governing bodies. Establishing an event modification fee would recover the administrative costs associated with processing these changes and to encourage complete and accurate applications at the time of initial submittal. Addition: Public Hearing: $38 plus costs of publication of public notice Currently, the City absorbs the costs associated with public noticing requirements for events that require a public hearing. This includes staff time to prepare notices, coordination with the City Clerk’s Office, compliance with publication requirements, and direct costs charged by news publications. Shifting these costs to the event producer would ensure full cost recovery for both staff time and required public noticing expenses associated with the public hearing process. Addition: Nonprofit Pier Plaza Use Fee: $9,076 per event day Staff proposes establishing a nonprofit Pier Plaza Use Fee to align with the City’s consistent application of a 33.4% nonprofit discount across fee categories. This adjustment promotes equity and consistency in the City’s fee structure while continuing to recognize the community benefit provided by nonprofit organizations. Page 886 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 10 of 11 Next Steps Staff would proceed with the Special Event Policy Guide and fee updates approved by City Council by preparing the necessary amendments to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, as applicable, and updates/additions to the City’s Master Fee Schedule for City Council review and consideration through a public hearing. Options for Council Consideration: Staff recommends the City Council consider approval of the following Special Event Policy Guide and fee updates:  Require new events to submit applications at least 90 days in advance, regardless of Impact Level. o This would replace the current policy, which establishes different deadlines based on Impact Level. Currently, new events classified as Impact Level I or II are required to submit applications at least 90 days in advance, while new Impact Level III events must be submitted by July 30 for the following calendar year.  Eliminate the public hearing requirement for new events and provide the Director with the discretion to elevate events to a public hearing based on anticipated impacts or other considerations.  Establish a consistent timeline for returning events with event dates for the following calendar year due by July 31 for all Impact Level events. o This would replace the current policy, which includes varying deadlines based on Impact Level. Currently, returning Impact Level III events must be submitted by July 30, and returning Impact Level II events must be submitted at least 90 days in advance.  Eliminate City Council review of returning Impact Level III events, unless otherwise directed by City Council or due to significant changes proposed from prior years.  Add that special considerations for locations not listed in the Special Event Policy Guide may be considered upon request.  Expand the peak season limits from 45 to a maximum of 50 special event days for Impact Level III events and modify the peak season to begin the Saturday preceding Memorial Day, in line with the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code .  Expand the applicability of the peak season limits from just the coastal locations to city-wide.  Add eligibility criteria to specify that events offering prize pools, cash awards, or other forms of participant compensation are not eligible for fee waiver consideration.  Modify the Fee Waiver Grant Program eligibility requirements to only include that the approved event must provide a unique benefit to the City or the community, provide a large economic impact, and a partial fee waiver would make a meaningful difference to the event producer’s ability to produce the event . Page 887 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 11 of 11  Eliminate City Council review and approval to initiate LTA negotiations and instead authorize the Commission to provide this approval. o City Council would retain final approval of the LTA following negotiations.  Eliminate the pre-event presentation requirement before the Commission as part of the LTA Program obligations.  Modify the LTA Program eligibility requirements to only include that an event must have been held in Hermosa Beach for a minimum of three consecutive years to be considered for an LTA.  Remove the ‘Returning or New Event’ classification from the Impact Characteristic Matrix.  Approve the fee additions/updates outlined in Table 1. Fiscal Impact: Implementation of the proposed fee updates/additions is expected to generate additional revenue for the City to offset staff time and administrative costs associated with reviewing, approving, and monitoring special event-related procedures. The total revenue generated would vary. Attachments: 1. Current Special Events Policy Guide 2. Proposed Special Event Policy Guide Respectfully Submitted by: Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 888 of 1339 Page 0 of 14 HERMOSA BEACH SPECIAL EVENTS POLICY GUIDE Page 889 of 1339 Page 1 of 14 This policy guide has been developed to clarify and carry out the City’s mission statement related to events that occur on outdoor public spaces within the City of Hermosa Beach. Mission Statement Hermosa Beach strives to offer a safe and enjoyable environment for special events to take place in a way that balances resident and visitor needs. Special events in Hermosa Beach are celebrated for being community-friendly, enhancing local beach culture, and offering a myriad of benefits to the local community. The City of Hermosa Beach works collaboratively with event operators in an efficient and clear manner to process and carry out permits in compliance with this policy. City Contact Information The City of Hermosa Beach Parks and Recreation Department is available to assist and answer any questions related to the special events process. Website: www.hermosabeach.gov Phone: (310) 318-0280 Email: hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov Address: 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Cover Image: Hermosa Beach Murals Project - John Van Hamersveld Page 890 of 1339 Page 2 of 14 General Information + Frequently Asked Questions When is a Special Event Permit required? • For any organized event, activity, celebration, or function involving the use of the beach at which one hundred or more persons are to be assembled or the use of other outdoor public spaces or rights-of- way at which twenty-five or more persons are to be assembled. • For any commercial organization requesting use of any outdoor public space within the City. • For any nonprofit organization requesting use of any outdoor public space within the City. How do I apply for a Special Event Permit? Special Event Applications must be submitted using the online form on the City’s website. What is the “Nothing Weekend”? On at least one weekend during the Peak Season (Memorial Day to Labor Day), no Special Event Permits will be issued. This means that any application for a Special Event Permit that coincides with a designated “Nothing Weekend” will be asked to provide alternate event dates for the event to be considered. How will this policy be enforced? The Special Events Policy Guide will be strictly enforced by City staff. Those found to be violating City policy or failing to comply with any of the requirements of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code may be subject to penalties or fines. Special events, and any of its participants, vendors, or spectators, found to have caused damage or whom are in violation of any City policy, or the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code may be subject to greater deposits, regulation, or restrictions when submitting Special Event Applications in the future. Where are special events allowed? To ensure adequate space and resources are available, and to limit potential disturbances to the community, special events are limited to the following locations: • North and South of Pier (within the Commercial Zone between 10th to 15th Street) • The Strand o Strand use is only permitted for events continuously moving with no obstruction to public access • Pier Plaza • Rights-of-way • The following City parks: o Valley Park, 2521 Valley Drive o Community Center, 710 Pier Avenue o Clark Field, 861 Valley Drive o Edith Rodaway Park, 350 Prospect Avenue Special Event Applications for City parks not included above will be considered on a case-by-case basis. However, Special Event Permits will not be issued for South Park, 425 Valley Drive, or Noble Park, 1400 The Strand. Use Classifications + Impact Characteristics Special events are evaluated based on several factors and will be categorized as Impact Level I, II, or III based on the information provided in the Special Events Application. Once the information is submitted and reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Department, City staff will determine the Impact Level of the event using the Impact Characteristics Matrix. The Impact Level of the event will be used to determine: • the deadline for Special Event Application submittal; and • the level of review for approval (City staff, Parks, Recreation and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission, and City Council). Page 891 of 1339 Page 3 of 14 Impact Characteristics Matrix If more than one option is applicable, the highest characteristic will be used to determine the impact level. Characteristic Impact Level I Impact Level II Impact Level III Total Attendees and Spectators Per Event Day 100-500 501 – 1,999 2,000 or More Event Location(s) Park or Beach The Pier or Pier Plaza Streets, the Strand, or Public Right of Way Use of Volleyball Courts and Beach Tennis Courts None North or South Volleyball Courts; or Beach Tennis Courts North and South Volleyball Courts; or North and South Volleyball Courts and Beach Tennis Courts; or North Volleyball Courts and Beach Tennis Courts Event Season(s) Winter Spring or Fall Summer – Peak Season (Memorial Day to Labor Day) Event Day(s) Monday - Thursday Friday, Saturday, or Sunday Holiday Total Consecutive Event Days (Including Set-up and Tear-down) 1-2 3-4 5 or More (May not exceed 15) Additional requests/services such as Film/Still Photo Permit, Building and Safety Review, Police Services, Reserved Parking, Street Closures/Traffic Control Plan Review, or Amplified Sound Permit None 1-2 3 or more Impact Level 5 or More Applicable =Impact Level I 2 or More Applicable = Impact Level II 2 or more Applicable = Impact Level III Pass-Through Events An event where participants pass through the City of Hermosa Beach and the event does not start or end in Hermosa Beach is considered a Pass-Through Event. A Special Event Application is required for a Pass-Through Event and the approval process is determined based on the Impact Level assigned to the event. Pier Plaza Promotions The Pier Plaza Promotion option is designed to provide organizations with a one-day promotional opportunity on Pier Plaza or an agreed-upon area downtown. These events must be strictly commercial for brand awareness, or product or service launches. Organizations that wish to hold a Pier Plaza Promotion will be required to submit a Special Event Application and subject to the Pier Plaza Use fee. Exceptions may be considered by Parks & Recreation Director through administrative review and approval. Approval Guidelines + Requirements Event Approval Findings A Special Event Permit may be issued upon finding that the event producer can adhere to all of the terms outlined in this Special Events Policy Guide. Application Submittal Deadlines and Approval Process Special Event Applications must be submitted as follows: • New events: If the new event is an Impact Level I or II, the application must be submitted at least 90 days in advance of the event. If the new event is an Impact Level III, the application must be submitted no later than July 30 for the following calendar year. New events to Hermosa Beach will be subject to a Public Hearing by both the Parks, Recreation and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and City Council. Page 892 of 1339 Page 4 of 14 • Returning Level III events: Must be submitted no later than July 30 for the following calendar year. Returning Impact Level III will be subject to review by both the Parks, Recreation and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and City Council. • Returning Level II events: Must be submitted at least ninety (90) days in advance of the event. Returning Impact Level III will be subject to review by the Parks, Recreation and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. • Returning Level I events: Must be submitted at least 30 days in advance of the event. Level I events will be subject to review by City staff. • Pier Plaza Promotions: Review and approval of Pier Plaza Promotion events will follow the same approval process as Level I events. Any returning event to the City that is requesting a significant change to the event format including the location, total event days, or estimated attendance total may be subject to the application submittal deadlines and approval process outlined for new events at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Director. At the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Director, Special Event Applications may be submitted for consideration after the application submittal deadline has passed, provided: • there are unforeseeable circumstances (memorial service, team victory celebration, need for minimal marketing/advertising); • the event does not exceed Peak Season (Memorial Day to Labor Day) Event Limits; and • the event can still meet all of the event approval findings The Parks, Recreation, and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and City Council will evaluate and recommend approval of returning Impact Level III events and a “Nothing Weekend” first. The Parks, Recreation and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission will then consider approval of returning Impact Level II events. City staff will then consider approval of Impact Level I events. New events are considered after all returning events. Event producers are requested to be present at any Parks, Recreation, and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and City Council meetings where the event is scheduled to be reviewed. Event Limits To balance coastal access with events, the Beach, the Strand, and Pier Plaza will be limited to the following number of events during the peak summer season (Memorial Day to Labor Day): o Maximum of 45 days used by Impact Level III events; and o Maximum of 25 days used by Impact Level II and II events, and (on days not used by Level III events.) The monthly number of event days for events outside of the Peak Season (Labor Day to Memorial Day) will be limited to a maximum of 15. Additionally, only two events on any given day will be permitted in the City. Event Type First Day to Submit Application Last Day to Submit Application Parks, Recreation, and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Review City Council Review Impact Level I Late May/Early June (for following calendar year) 30 days prior to event n/a n/a Impact Level II 90 days prior to event If application is submitted by August 31: October If application is submitted after August 31: TBD n/a Impact Level III July 30 (for following calendar year) September October New Events Impact Level I or II: at least 90 days in advance of the event Impact Level III: no later than July 30 for the following calendar year. November November Page 893 of 1339 Page 5 of 14 Event Notifications The Parks and Recreation Department may require event producers to provide written notification to all residents and businesses within a 500-foot radius of the event site. The City shall provide the notice, which shall include the date and time of the event and the telephone number of the designated event representative. Said written notice shall be provided to the surrounding residents and businesses by the event representative not less than 1 week prior to the event. Additionally, new event requests for locations outside of the Beach or downtown area, require event notifications to be posted at the event site leading up to the scheduled Public Hearing to provide the community additional notice of the proposed new event. Economic Benefit Event producers will be required to detail positive economic impacts as a result of the event in the Special Event Application. Event producers should encourage use of local businesses to event staff, participants, and spectators. The Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce and Visitor Bureau’s business directory is available at www.trulyhermosa.com. Additionally, event producers should engage with local businesses to explore partnership, and promotional opportunities. Pre/Post Event Meetings Pre-event and post-event meetings with City staff and event producers may be required. A “pre-event meeting” may be scheduled anytime between 3 months to several weeks prior to the actual event date as determined by City staff. Site Plan and Signage A detailed map schematic must be submitted with the Special Events Application that includes the proposed location of the event, including all temporary facilities, structures, signage, and /or equipment to be erected, ingress and egress, and whether existing structures and/or facilities are to be relocated or modified (such as Volleyball Courts or Beach Tennis Courts, for example). • All recreational activities and set-up of recreational equipment should remain at least 50 feet from the Strand wall. Special considerations may be made upon request. • All event-related activities and set-up shall not block beach access or hinder emergency access onto and from the beach by the Los Angeles County Lifeguards. • All tents must remain at least 10 feet from the Strand wall. Event signage shall not be placed on City facilities or premises outside of event times. Signage shall not be affixed to City property. Event producers may apply for a Street Banner through the Public Work’s Department. Simultaneous Use of North and South Volleyball Courts One side of the north and south of Pier Volleyball Courts will be required to remain open for general public use during events occurring on weekends. An exception may be provided for events that occur at the same time as City-sponsored classes utilizing the north or south of Pier Volleyball Courts or at the discretion of the Parks, Recreation, and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and City Council. Impact to Beach Tennis Courts Any event requesting removal of the Beach Tennis Courts must provide one of the following: • An event footprint that would allow for at least three of the permanent Beach Tennis Courts to remain for general public use; or • Temporary Beach Tennis Courts available for general public use. o Temporary courts must remain at least 50 feet from the strand wall and shall not block beach access or hinder emergency access onto and from the beach by the Los Angeles County Lifeguards. If temporary courts are provided outside of the Commercial Zone, outside of the event footprint, it is the responsibility of the event producer to set-up and remove the courts daily as they are not permitted to remain overnight. o The City and Beach Tennis community would assist with providing the temporary poles and nets to the event producer and provide guidance for installation/removal. Portable Restrooms and Hand Sanitizing/Sink Facilities Event producers may be required to provide portable restrooms and hand-sanitizing/sink facilities. The cost of such services shall be borne by the event producer. The number of portable restrooms and hand-sanitizing/sink Page 894 of 1339 Page 6 of 14 facilities required will be determined by City staff. City staff will designate the location for any portable restrooms and hand-sanitizing/sink facilities required at the event location. Parking If an event producer requests reserved parking, a parking plan outlining the public parking spaces requested with the times of use for each space must be submitted. The City shall enforce reserved parking by way of complaint only. Therefore, the event producer is responsible for monitoring the reserved parking during reserved hours as much as possible and reporting if non-event-related staff are parked in the reserved parking spot(s) by calling non-emergency dispatch at (310) 524-2750. The event producer or a designated representative must be present for the City to enforce and tow. The City does not issue refunds for any fees associated with parking. Event producers may be required to secure satellite parking lots for event staff or attendee parking, and/or shuttle bus transportation. Coastal Development Permit Events that meet all of the following criteria will be subject to review by the California Coastal Commission: • Held between Memorial Day and Labor Day; • Occupies all or a portion of the beach; and • Involves a charge for general public admission seating (not including participant entry fees). Building and Safety Review Per Chapter 31 of the California Building Code, as adopted by Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 15.04.010, a building permit and plan review is required when any special event on outdoor public spaces includes the temporary installation of the following structures: • Awnings or canopies • Marquees - A sign painted on, attached to, or supported by a marquee on a temporary building wall which supports the marquee • Signs - A ground sign supported by one or more uprights, poles or braces or a sign wholly supported by a sign structure, or a portable sign with the surface temporarily fixed to a structure that is moved periodically • Towers - A structure designed and constructed to support antennas • Antennas - Wires, poles, rods, reflecting discs or similar devices used for the transmission of electromagnetic waves • Swimming pools - A structure intended for swimming or recreational bathing that contains water over 18 inches deep • Relocatable buildings • Generators, or any other temporary power source • Temporary structures or tents that exceed 10’ x 10’ that cover an area greater than 120 square feet, including connecting areas or spaces with a common means of egress or entrance that are used or intended to be used for the gathering together of 10 or more persons. • Stages • Trusses • Electrical equipment • Mechanical equipment • Heaters • Large-scale ventilation equipment Following event approval, event producers will be responsible for applying for the necessary permits through the City’s Community Development Department. • Any event with temporary installation of any of the aforementioned structures, requires the event producer to submit an application for a Building Permit. • If electrical equipment, temporary power sources, or generators would be used, the event producer must submit an application for a Electrical Permit in addition to the Building Permit. • If mechanical equipment, heaters, or large-scale ventilation equipment would be used, the event producer must submit an application for a Mechanical Permit in addition to the Building Permit. • If plumbing equipment, pools, or water supply lines would be used, the event producer must submit an application for a Plumbing Permit in addition to the Building Permit. This is not required for the use of portable restrooms. Page 895 of 1339 Page 7 of 14 Applications are available on the City’s website. Plan review and permit fees would be applied and are determined by the level of review required. Special Event Permits will not be issued until all appropriate Building and Safety permits have been provided to the Parks and Recreation Department. County of Los Angeles Fire Department Review The Fire Prevention Bureau in Carson oversees events taking place in the City. Therefore, event producers may be required to apply for approval by the Bureau through submission of a Public Assemblages and Event Declaration Form. Once the application is submitted, the County of Los Angeles Fire Department will review, determine if a Field Inspection will be required for the event, and generate the permit fees. Once approval is obtained, an Operational Permit would be issued to the event producer. Filming or Still Photo Permit A Film/Still Photo Permit is required for any event recording or photographing activities resulting in commercial use. Information about professional filming permits may be obtained on the City’s website. Emergency Action Plan It is the event producer’s responsibility to have a comprehensive emergency action plan to the City that proposes the steps to be taken for crisis situations, such as event shut down due to severe weather, fire, active hostile attack, or for a missing person, medical emergency or threat of violence. Event producers are also responsible for providing an evacuation plan, including a script for the evacuation announcement and the means to how the evacuation plan and locations will be communicated to event attendees. The event producer’s proposed plan will be evaluated and formalized with the Emergency Management Coordinator in the City Manager’s office. Trash Event producers cannot leave any trash at any event site outside of the permanent trash receptacles and may be required to secure additional containers, dumpsters, or services from Athens at a cost borne by the event producer. Accessibility Plan It is the event producer’s responsibility to comply with all City, County, State and Federal disability access requirements applicable to the event, including the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). All indoor and outdoor sites, activities and programs must be accessible to persons with disabilities. Traffic Plan Event producers requesting street closures must provide a traffic control plan that illustrates all road closures, detours, and the exact placement of all traffic control devices including crash test certified barricades, signage, and message boards. The traffic control plan must be approved by the Police and Public Works Departments. The event producer is responsible for securing and deploying the required traffic control devices outlined in the City approved traffic control plan. The Public Works Department inspects all traffic control devices once deployed to ensure all devices are effective and correctly positioned at a cost to the event producer. Amplified Sound Event producers are required to obtain an Amplified Sound Permit if the event intends to use a loudspeaker or sound amplifying equipment for the purpose of giving instructions, directions, lectures, or transmitting music. The Chief of Police will consider the following in the issuance of Amplified Sound Permits: • The volume and intensity of the noise; • Whether the noise is prolonged and continuous; • How the noise contrasts with the ambient noise level; • The proximity of the noise source to residential and commercial uses; • The time of day; and • The anticipated duration of the noise. Speakers must be facing westward (towards the ocean) at all times. Food, Beverage, or Merchandise Sales In accordance with HBMC Section 12.20.300, the sale of food, non-alcoholic beverages, or branded merchandise from the event producer on the beach is allowed for events approved through the Special Events Page 896 of 1339 Page 8 of 14 Permit Program. The sale of these items from any vendor other than the event producer, or any other commodity, merchandise, wares, products, or service on the beach is not allowed. Event producers wishing to sell within these guidelines would be responsible for obtaining a business license from the City, and for obtaining any applicable food or beverage permits through the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health. Requests for alcohol on the beach will not be considered. For events not on the beach, the sale of food, non-alcoholic beverages, alcoholic beverages, or merchandise may be considered through the Special Events Permit Program. The event producer would be responsible for ensuring any vendors associated with its event has a current business license with the City and for obtaining any applicable food or beverage permits through the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health. If the sale of alcohol is approved through the Special Event Permit Program, the event producer must secure the appropriate license from the State of California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC). The City may place restrictions on the way in which alcohol is managed at a proposed event and/or a requirement of security officers and/or assigning City staff to monitor the cost of such services shall be borne by the event producer. Security City staff or law enforcement may deem a special event warrants the presence of one or more Police Officers or security personnel and the cost of such services shall be borne by the event producer. Security personnel must be licensed, in uniform and are subject to approval by the City. Insurance At least ten (10) days prior to the event, event producers will provide the City with a certificate of insurance providing liability insurance with the following requirements: Event producer agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa Beach evidence of comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate naming "the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents, volunteers, and employees as additional insureds." This exact verbiage is required. Event producer shall notify the City at least thirty (30) days prior to the termination, reduction, cancellation, suspension, modification, or expiration of the policy. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Event producer shall maintain insurance coverage meeting the standards outlined in this Section at all times during the term of the activity or activities for which the Event producer submitted its application, as reflected in and permitted by this Agreement. All certificates are subject to approval of the City’s Risk Manager. Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Form CG 00 01 covering commercial general liability on an "occurrence" basis, including property damage, bodily injury, death, and personal and advertising injury with limits no less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement, or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. The City reserves the right to request greater or lesser amounts of insurance coverage. If the use includes athletic activities, shall provide evidence of that the commercial general liability insurance includes coverage for injuries to athletic participants and participant accident insurance. If the Event producer maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. Event Day Expectations In order to immediately address any issues or changes that may arise during the course of an event, producers are responsible for: • Providing contact information for an event representative that City staff may reach at any time during the event. o The assigned event representative must be on-site and may not actively participate in the event. • Maintaining copies of all applicable Special Event Permits and any other permits issued by the City on- site during the event. Compliance Page 897 of 1339 Page 9 of 14 Applicable Codes + Regulations The City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code governs the approval, review, and enforcement of events. The Special Events Policy Guide must be strictly adhered to and all pertinent City Ordinances shall be enforced. The sections of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code relevant to events include, but are not limited to: Title 8 – Health and Safety 8.24 Noise Control 8.64 Ban on Polystyrene Food Service Ware Title 10 – Vehicles and Traffic 10.28 Loading and Unloading 10.32 Stopping, Standing and Parking Title 12 Street, Sidewalks and Public Places 12.20 Beach and Strand Regulations 12.28 Parks, Playgrounds and Other Public Areas 12.30 Special Events on Public Property Environmental Requirements Events in Hermosa Beach are expected to implement the following measures to reduce impacts and costs to the environment, the city, and the community. MEASURE Recycling and Waste Reduction 1. Reduce waste and single-use items No single-use paper, plastics, packaging, and décor items Reduce size/bulk of plates, containers, cups Use products with high recycled content No sale or give-away of single-use plastic drinking water bottles. At 'beer or drink gardens' use recycled or compostable cups Recycle fry-grease for bio-diesel fuels Limit and reduce size of handouts, flyers and giveaways 2. Recycling containers: Place well-marked recycle containers adjacent to every trash container Provide onsite 'monitors' directing people to recycling at prime locations or provide secondary trash sorters 3. Staging Recycle or reuse event construction materials Use ‘no emission/no VOC’ paints/sealants 4. Transportation No-idling policy for all vehicles Sponsor free shuttle or low-cost bus passes Use electric, hydrogen, hybrid or CNG vehicles 4. Energy Use energy-efficient lighting Turn lighting and devices off when not in use Turn off generators when not in use for significant period Use alternative energy (solar, wind, fuel cell) to supply some power Use alternative fuel generators (CNG, fuel cell, biodiesel) 5. Marine environment No hosing of surfaces Full containment of all wastes Full containment of all six-pack plastic rings. Cut rings prior to disposal Page 898 of 1339 Page 10 of 14 6. Education Event and vendors must have waste and recycling a prominent theme Ensure vendors and service providers with green measures Report on compliance with above applicable measures Applicable Fees All events are subject to an application fee, daily category fees, and additional fees established by resolution of the City Council and any additional costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event. Payment of event fees is due upon receipt. The Parks and Recreation Department has the discretion to revoke a permit if all applicable fees are not paid in a timely manner. Special Event Permit fees are subject to change. Additional direct costs may apply due to required staffing and/or services from the City of Hermosa Beach’s Community Development Department, Police Department, Public Works Department and/or the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Current Fee Schedule Daily Event Fees Fee Participant plus spectator crowd less than 500 per event day. Non-profit: $2 per registrant and roster of participants due to City Commercial: 70/30 split of proceeds and roster of participants due to City Participant plus spectator crowd more than 500 but less than 3,000 per event day; • Impacts public areas for no longer than one day, including set-up and tear-down; and • Is conducted in the off-season (not between Memorial Day and Labor Day) and not on any holiday. $3,480 Participant plus spectator crowd more than 500 but less than 3,000 per event day; • Impacts public areas for no longer than one day and is conducted in the Peak Season (between Memorial Day and Labor Day) or on any holiday; or • Impacts public areas for one or more days, including set-up and tear-down Participant plus spectator crowd more than 3,000 but less than 5,000 per event day. $3,830 Participant plus Spectator crowd exceeds 5,000 per event day. $6,962 Additional Fees Fees Commercial Application Fee - non-refundable (direct cost) $1,094 Non-Profit Application Fee - non-refundable(direct cost) $729 Pass-Thru Application Fee - non-refundable (direct cost) $365 Amplified Sound Permit (direct cost) $214 Pier Plaza Use Fee $14,574 per event day Event Co-sponsor* $368 per sponsor Event Setup/Teardown $330 per location, per day Parks and Recreation Staff (direct cost) $438 per day Parking Space Fee (direct cost) Fees vary based on parking location Page 899 of 1339 Page 11 of 14 *The Event Co-sponsor fee is charged for each organization listed as a presenting sponsor of the event on any or all marketing materials for the event or that may be using an area on public property not within the event footprint, such as Schumacher Plaza. Damage Deposit Monetary deposits, bonds and other security may be necessary to guarantee performance of all required conditions, clean-up and repair of any City property or facilities damaged as a result of the event. Events may be required to submit a deposit to cover any potential damage to City facilities. All or a portion of the deposit may be refunded upon post event inspection. Events will be billed for the costs to repair or replace any City property damaged as a result of the event if the damage exceeds the deposit provided. Refund/Cancellation Policy Once a permit is approved and issued, daily category fees or additional fees may be refunded when written notice is given to the Parks and Recreation Department at least two weeks prior to the event date. Fee Waiver Grants To support qualified organizations that have received approval to hold their event, the City provides event fee waiver grant opportunities to assist in its success by relieving the financial burden associated with the cost of the City’s event fees. Events and organizations that qualify for a long-term agreement or in contract are not bound to the terms of this policy. The annual award limit of fee waiver grants is approved by the City Council each fall for the upcoming calendar year. Grants will be awarded up to a maximum of $2,500 per event or a 50% reduction of indirect City event fees, whichever is the lesser amount. Fee waiver grants may only be used toward indirect costs charged by the City; direct costs are not eligible for and organizations are required to pay those in full. The minimum amount of a requested fee waiver grant must total at least $250. Eligibility In order to be eligible to apply for a fee waiver grant, the event must be a returning event to the City. Fee waiver grants will not be considered for new events or events taking place during the Peak Season (between Memorial Day and Labor Day). Following approval of an event, a completed Special Event Fee Waiver Grant Application is required to be submitted to the Parks and Recreation Department at least 60 days prior to the event. The request will be reviewed by the Parks, Recreation, and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission at one of its regularly scheduled meetings for consideration of approval. Event producers will be requested to demonstrate the following: • A financial need or other economic justification to be considered for a fee waiver grant; • A positive community benefit through the organization or its event by meeting at least two of the following criteria: • The organization and/or event serves, involves, and/or promotes Hermosa Beach, its residents, schools, and/or businesses; • The organization and/or event can demonstrate broad community support and sponsorship; • The event appeals to a wide segment of community members; • The organization and/or event enhances the quality of life to the Hermosa Beach community; offering recreational, cultural, social, and or and/or educational activities of interest to the community; • The organization can demonstrate a commitment to supporting the City’s active and healthy lifestyle as a result of the event; and/or • The organization/and or event addresses an unmet community need. • A positive economic impact as a result of the event by providing the following information: • If the event is consecutive days, data indicating the total number of participants that utilize overnight lodging in the City of Hermosa Beach; and • Data indicating the participants spending in Hermosa Beach during the duration of the event at any of the businesses in the City of Hermosa Beach. Additionally, event producers must be able to fully fund their event should they not receive a fee waiver grant and may not be dependent on the fee waiver grant to determine their ability to hold the event. Events specifically prohibited from receiving a fee waiver grant include those events that: Page 900 of 1339 Page 12 of 14 • Promote, advocate, or advance a political message or belief. • Projects or organizations who have unsatisfactorily fulfilled its obligations from previous fee waiver grants. Obligations Organizations approved for a fee waiver grant will be required to complete the following: • Include that the event “is brought to you with support from the City of Hermosa Beach” on all marketing materials. The City requests this exact verbiage be used. o A copy of event marketing materials with this exact verbiage must be provided to the City prior to the City’s issuance of the Special Events Permit. • A formal presentation to the Parks, Recreation and Parks and Recreation Advisory Parks, Recreation, and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission at one of its regular meetings no more than 60-days following the event. The presentation shall include discussion of: o Number of attendees. o Beneficiary of funds raised by the event (if applicable). o Overview of event budget and financial outlook. o Overview of the community benefit and/or positive economic impact to the City of Hermosa Beach. Disqualification Failure to complete these requirements in accordance with this policy shall automatically disqualify the organization from submitting a future request to receive a fee waiver grant for the remainder of the current calendar year plus one additional calendar year. If any information submitted as part of the Special Event Fee Waiver Grant is found to be fraudulent, event approvals already granted for the remainder of the calendar year will be automatically revoked. While the organization will be permitted to reapply for approval of event(s) in the following calendar year, it will no longer be eligible to apply for a fee waiver grant. Long-term Agreements The City of Hermosa Beach recognizes the value in hosting a variety of beloved community events that help create a balanced and enjoyable events calendar for its residents. To support and develop a long-term approach to the scheduling of events, eligible events can qualify for a long-term agreement (LTA) with the City. Eligibility In order for an organization to be eligible for consideration of a long-term agreement, the event(s) must meet at least three of the following: • The event(s) must qualify as an Impact Level II or III (per the Impact Worksheet), and at least one of the following: o Have a combined estimated total of 5,000 people in attendance; or o The event must be at least two (2) consecutive days (including setup and teardown). • Have held its event in Hermosa Beach for at least three consecutive years • The event must be produced by an organization that serves, involves, and/or promotes Hermosa Beach’s coastal lifestyle, its residents, schools, and/or businesses; and • The organization or event producer must be able to demonstrate how its programs (outside of those provided at the event) provide a positive impact to the City including enhancements to quality of life to the Hermosa Beach community; or the offering of recreational, cultural, social, and/or educational activities of interest to the community. • The event can demonstrate: o A community benefit; or o A positive economic impact as a result of the event. Event producers will be requested to demonstrate a positive community benefit through the organization or its event by meeting at least two of the following criteria: • The organization and/or event serves, involves, and/or promotes Hermosa Beach, its residents, schools, and/or businesses; • The organization and/or event can demonstrate broad community support and sponsorship; Page 901 of 1339 Page 13 of 14 • The event appeals to a wide segment of community members; • The organization and/or event enhances the quality of life to the Hermosa Beach community; offering recreational, cultural, social, and or and/or educational activities of interest to the community; • The organization can demonstrate a commitment to supporting the City’s active and healthy lifestyle as a result of the event; and/or • The organization/and or event addresses an unmet community need. Event producers will be requested to demonstrate a positive economic impact as a result of the event by providing the following information: • If the event is consecutive days, data indicating the total number of participants that utilize overnight lodging in the City of Hermosa Beach; and • Data indicating the participants spending in Hermosa Beach during the duration of the event at any of the businesses in the City of Hermosa Beach. Upon request of an organization whose event does not satisfy one or more of the above eligibility criteria, the City Council may authorize such organization to apply for an LTA where its event provides a demonstrable or differentiated benefit to the community or a service that the City would otherwise be unable to provide. Term Limits LTA’s shall be for no less than two (2) years but shall not exceed a maximum of three (3) years unless otherwise determined by the City Council. Procedures The following steps are required to guide the development and implementation of an LTA: 1. Submittal of an LTA Application and corresponding letter to the Parks and Recreation Department demonstrating how the organization meets the criteria. 2. Review and recommendation for City Council approval by the Parks, Recreation and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. 3. Review and approval by the City Council to begin LTA negotiations with City staff. 4. LTA negotiations and development. 5. Presentation of the final LTA to the City Council for approval. Obligations Organizations whose event(s) are approved through an LTA are required to provide a formal presentation to the Parks, Recreation, and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission at one of its regular monthly meetings no more than 60 days prior and 60 days following its event(s). The pre-event presentation shall include a general event overview including anticipated number of attendees; an overview of the event footprint and individualized setup; and its anticipated impact(s) to the community, etc. The post-event presentation shall include a general overview including the actual number of attendees; actual impact(s) to the community; and any event struggles and successes. Additionally, the event marketing materials must state the event “is brought to you with support from the City of Hermosa Beach” on all marketing materials. The City requests this exact verbiage be used. • A copy of event marketing materials with this exact verbiage must be provided to the City prior to the City’s issuance of the Special Events Permit. Page 902 of 1339 Page 0 of 9 Hermosa Beach Murals Project - John Van Hamersveld HERMOSA BEACH SPECIAL EVENTS POLICY GUIDE Page 903 of 1339 Page 1 of 9 Mission Statement The City of Hermosa Beach supports safe, community-friendly special events that balance resident and visitor needs while enhancing local beach culture. City Contact Information Parks and Recreation Department www.hermosabeach.gov | (310) 318-0280 | hbconnect@hermosabeach.gov 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 When a Special Event Permit is Required A Special Event Permit is required for any organized event, activity, celebration, or function involving the use of: • The beach with 100+ attendees • Other public outdoor spaces with 25+ attendees • Any commercial or nonprofit organization's use of public outdoor space • Pass-through events, which participants travel through the City of Hermosa Beach, but the event neither starts nor ends within the City Special Event Applications must be submitted using the online form on the City’s website. Special Event Locations Permitted locations include: • Beach within the Commercial Zone (the beach north and south of the Pier between 10th–15th Street) • The Strand (continuous movement only) • Schumacher Plaza • Pier Plaza • Public rights-of-way • Valley Park, Clark Field, Edith Rodaway Park o Other parks reviewed on a case-by-case basis • Community Center Courtyard or Lawn Not permitted: South Park, Noble Park Special considerations for locations not listed above may be considered upon request. Special Event Approval Guidelines New Events • Special Event Application due at least 90 days in advance • Reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission • Approval required by City Council Depending on the anticipated community impact, the Parks and Recreation Director may determine that the event must be reviewed through a Public Hearing by both the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and City Council. Returning Events The Parks and Recreation Department will reach out to all returning event producers to retrieve requested event dates for the upcoming calendar year in June annually. • Requested event dates are due July 31 o If a returning event producer requests a significant change to its returning event format, including but not limited to location or total event days, the returning event may be subject to the approval process outlined for new events, at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Director. Page 904 of 1339 Page 2 of 9 • Returning events are reviewed and considered for approval in September by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Returning events receive priority over new events in the review process, unless otherwise recommended by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and approved by City Council. Nothing Weekend At the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission’s September meeting, the Commission shall also designate at least one weekend during the Peak Season (Memorial Day through Labor Day) when no Special Event Permits will be issued. Event producers are requested to be present at any Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and City Council meetings where their event is scheduled to be reviewed. Special Event Impact Levels Special events will be categorized as Impact Level I, II, or III based on the information provided in the Special Events Application. City staff will determine the Impact Level of the event using the Impact Characteristics Matrix. Impact Characteristics Matrix If more than one option is applicable, the highest characteristic will be used to determine the impact level. Characteristic Impact Level I Impact Level II Impact Level III Total Attendees and Spectators Per Event Day 100-500 501 – 1,999 2,000 or More Event Location(s) Park or Beach The Pier or Pier Plaza Streets, the Strand, or Public Right of Way Use of Volleyball Courts and Beach Tennis Courts None North or South Volleyball Courts; or Beach Tennis Courts North and South Volleyball Courts; or North and South Volleyball Courts and Beach Tennis Courts; or North Volleyball Courts and Beach Tennis Courts Event Season(s) Winter Spring or Fall Summer – Peak Season (Memorial Day to Labor Day) Event Day(s) Monday - Thursday Friday, Saturday, or Sunday Holiday Total Consecutive Event Days (Including Set-up and Tear-down) 1-2 3-4 5 or More (May not exceed 15) Additional requests/services such as Film/Still Photo Permit, Building and Safety Review, Police Services, Reserved Parking, Street Closures/Traffic Control Plan Review, or Amplified Sound Permit None 1-2 3 or more Impact Level 5 or More Applicable =Impact Level I 2 or More Applicable = Impact Level II 2 or more Applicable = Impact Level III Special Event Limits The total maximum number of special event days shall be permitted during the peak season (Saturday before Memorial Day to Labor Day): • Impact Level III events: Maximum of 50 days • Impact Level II and Level I events: Maximum of 25 days on days not used by Impact Level III events The monthly number of special event days outside of the peak season will be limited to a maximum of 15 per month. Additionally, no more than two events will be permitted in the City on any given day. Page 905 of 1339 Page 3 of 9 Special Event Operational Requirements Site Plan A detailed site plan or map schematic must be submitted with the Special Events Application, showing the event layout, structures, access routes, and event-related equipment. • All recreational activities should remain at least 50 feet from the Strand wall. o Special considerations may be granted upon request. • All event-related activities must not block beach access or hinder emergency access to and from the beach by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. • All tents must remain at least 10 feet from the Strand wall. Event signage shall not be placed on City facilities or premises outside of event times. Signage shall not be affixed to City property. Event producers may apply for a street banner through the Public Works Department. Simultaneous Use of North and South Volleyball Courts One side of the north and south of Pier volleyball courts should remain free of special event activity on weekends to allow for general public use or City-sponsored programming. An exception may be granted by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission or City Council. Special Event Impact on Beach Tennis Courts Any event requesting the temporary removal of the beach tennis courts must provide one of the following: • An event footprint that would allow for at least three of the permanent Beach Tennis Courts to remain available for general public use; or • Temporary Beach Tennis Courts made available for general public use. o Temporary courts must remain at least 50 feet from the Strand wall and shall not block beach access or hinder emergency access to and from the beach by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. If temporary courts are provided outside of the Commercial Zone, it is the responsibility of the event producer to set up and remove the courts daily, as they are not permitted to remain overnight. o The City and beach tennis community may assist with providing temporary poles and nets to the event producer and provide guidance for installation and removal. Special Event Notifications The Parks and Recreation Department may require event producers to provide written notification to all residents and businesses within a 500-foot radius of the event site, depending on the anticipated community impact. Parking If an event producer requests reserved parking, a parking plan must be submitted outlining the public parking spaces requested and the times of use for each space. The City shall enforce reserved parking only in response to complaints. Therefore, the event producer is responsible for monitoring the reserved parking during the reserved hours and reporting any non-event-related vehicles parked in the reserved spaces by calling non- emergency dispatch at (310) 524-2750. The event producer or a designated representative must be present for the City to enforce and tow vehicles. The City does not issue refunds for any fees associated with parking. Event producers may be required to secure satellite parking lots for event staff or attendee parking, and/or shuttle bus transportation. Traffic Plan Event producers requesting street closures must submit a comprehensive traffic control plan that illustrates all road closures, detours, and the exact placement of traffic control devices, including crash-tested barricades, signage, and message boards. The traffic control plan must be approved by the Police and Public Works Departments. The event producer is responsible for securing, deploying, and maintaining all required traffic control devices as outlined in the City-approved traffic control plan. The Public Works Department will inspect all traffic control devices once deployed to ensure proper placement and effectiveness. Food, Beverage, or Merchandise Sales For approved events on the beach, the sale of prepared food, non-alcoholic beverages, and/or merchandise by vendors is permissible. Per the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, “prepared food” is defined as food or Page 906 of 1339 Page 4 of 9 beverage that (1) is ready to consume without any further preparation, alteration, or repackaging, and (2) is prepared, provided, sold, or served by a food provider using any cooking, packaging, or food preparation technique. Requests for alcohol sales on the beach will not be considered. For events not held on the beach, the sale of food, non-alcoholic beverages, alcoholic beverages, or merchandise may be considered. If alcohol sales are approved, the event producer must secure the appropriate license from the State of California Departmen t of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC). The City may impose restrictions on the management of alcohol at the event and/or require security officers or City staff monitoring, with all associated costs borne by the event producer. The event producer is fully responsible for all vendors operating within the approved event footprint. Only vendors pre-approved by the City may operate within the approved event footprint. The presence of any unpermitted vendor constitutes a violation attributable to the event producer, may result in fines, and may impact the approval of future events. Event producers are responsible for a per-vendor daily fee. A 25% discount will be applied to vendors that are Hermosa Beach-based businesses holding a valid City business license. The City of Hermosa Beach does not collect or remit sales tax on behalf of event producers or vendors and assumes no responsibility for ensuring vendor compliance with State tax laws. The event producer shall be responsible for ensuring that all vendors participating in an approved special event comply with applicable State of California sales and use tax requirements. The event producer shall distribute any applicable sales tax or temporary seller information forms, as required. Additional Permits • Amplified Sound Permit: Required if the event includes the use of loudspeakers or sound-amplifying equipment for instructions, directions, lectures, or music. For events downtown, all speakers must be oriented westward, toward the ocean, at all times. • Building and Safety Permit: May be required if the special event includes temporary installation of structures, such as tents over 10’ x 10’, stages, trusses, awnings, marquees, towers, antennas, relocatable buildings, pools, electrical or mechanical equipment, heaters, or large -scale ventilation equipment. • Coastal Development Permit: May be required if the special event is held between Memorial Day and Labor Day, occupies all or a portion of the beach, and involves a charge for general public admission or seating (not including participant entry fees). • County of Los Angeles Fire Department Operational Permit • Film/Still Photo Permit: Required for any special event recording or photographing activities resulting in commercial use. Event Modifications Event producers requesting event modifications such as additional locations, event days, additional City staff and services, or an event date change may be subject to an Event Modification fee. Economic Benefit Event producers should encourage the use of local businesses for event staff, participants, and spectators. The Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce and Visitor Bureau’s business directory is available at www.trulyhermosa.com. Additionally, event producers should engage with local businesses to explore partnership and promotional opportunities. Pre/Post Event Meetings Pre-event and post-event meetings with City staff and event producers may be required. Portable Restrooms and Hand Sanitizing/Sink Facilities Event producers may be required to provide portable restrooms and hand -sanitizing or sink facilities. The cost of such services shall be the responsibility of the event producer. The number of portable restrooms and hand - sanitizing/sink facilities required will be determined by City staff, who will also designate the location of these facilities at the event site. Page 907 of 1339 Page 5 of 9 Emergency Action Plan It is the event producer’s responsibility to have a comprehensive emergency action plan to the City that outlines procedures for crises, such as severe weather, fire, active hostile attacks, missing persons, medical emergencies, or threats of violence. The plan should include an evacuation plan, a script for evacuation announcements, and methods for communicating evacuation procedures and locations to event attendees. The proposed plan may be reviewed and finalized in coordination with the City’s Emergency Management Coordinator. Trash Event producers are prohibited from leaving any trash at the event site outside of permanent trash receptacles. Event producers may be required to provide additional trash containers, dumpsters, or collection services through Athens, with all associated costs borne by the event producer. Accessibility Plan Event producers are responsible for ensuring compliance with all applicable City, County, State, and Federal disability access requirements, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). All indoor and outdoor event sites, activities, and programs must be fully accessible to persons with disabilities. Security The Hermosa Beach Police Department may determine that a special event requires the presence of one or more Police Officers or licensed security personnel. The cost of such services shall be borne by the event producer. All security personnel must be licensed, in uniform, and are subject to approval by the City. Insurance At least ten (10) days prior to the event, event producers will provide the City with a certificate of insurance providing liability insurance with the following requirements: Event producer agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa Beach evidence of comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate naming "the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents, volunteers, and employees as additional insureds." This exact verbiage is required. Event producer shall notify the City at least thirty (30) days prior to the termination, reduction, cancellation, suspension, modification, or expiration of the policy. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Event producer shall maintain insurance coverage meeting the standards outlined in this Section at all times during the term of the activity or activities for which the Event producer submitted its application, as reflected in and permitted by this Agreement. All certificates are subject to approval of the City’s Risk Manager. Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Form CG 00 01 covering commercial general liability on an "occurrence" basis, including property damage, bodily injury, death, and personal and advertising injury with limits no less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement, or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. The City reserves the right to request greater or lesser amounts of insurance coverage. If the use includes athletic activities, shall provide evidence of that the commercial general liability insurance includes coverage for injuries to athletic participants and participant accident insurance. If the Event producer maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. If the event producer utilizes, operates, or causes to be operated any motor vehicles on public rights -of-way connection with the permitted event, the event producer shall provide evidence of automobile liability insurance. Coverage shall be written on ISO form CA 00 01 or equivalent and shall include coverage for “any auto” (Symbol 1) or, at a minimum, all owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles. Limits shall be no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. The policy shall name "the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents, volunteers, and employees" as additional insureds and shall be primary and non-contributory with respect to any insurance maintained by the City. The City reserves the right to request higher limits if deemed warranted upon event review. Page 908 of 1339 Page 6 of 9 Event Day Expectations To ensure timely response to any issues or changes during an event, event producers are responsible for: • Providing contact information for an event representative who can be reached by City staff at any time during the event. o The assigned event representative must be on-site and may not actively participate in the event. • Maintaining copies of all applicable Special Event Permits and any other City -issued permits on-site throughout the event. Compliance The City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code governs the approval, review, and enforcement of events. The Special Events Policy Guide must be strictly adhered to, and all pertinent City Ordinances shall be enforced. Environmental Requirements Events in Hermosa Beach are expected to implement measures to minimize impacts and costs to the environment, the City, and the community. Upon receipt of a Special Events Application, event producers will be provided a “Green Matrix Form” to complete, demonstrating their understanding of and compliance with required environmental measures. Applicable Fees Payment of event fees is due upon receipt. The Parks and Recreation Department has the discretion to revoke a permit if all applicable fees are not paid in a timely manner. Special Event Permit fees are subject to change. Additional direct costs may apply due to required staffing and/or services from the City of Hermosa Beach’s Community Development Department, Police Department, Public Works Department and/or the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Application fees are nonrefundable. Current Fee Schedule Event Fees Fee Participant plus spectator crowd less than 500 per event day. Commercial: $300 per location, per day Nonprofit: $250 per location, per day Participant plus spectator crowd more than 500 but less than 3,000 per event day; • Impacts public areas for no longer than one day, including set-up and tear-down; and • Is conducted in the off-season (not between Memorial Day and Labor Day) and not on any holiday. $3,480 per location, per day Participant plus spectator crowd more than 500 but less than 3,000 per event day; • Impacts public areas for no longer than one day and is conducted in the Peak Season (between Memorial Day and Labor Day) or on any holiday; or • Impacts public areas for one or more days, including set-up and tear-down Participant plus spectator crowd more than 3,000 but less than 5,000 per event day. $3,830 per location, per day Participant plus Spectator crowd exceeds 5,000 per event day. $6,962 per location, per day Additional Fees Fees Commercial Application Fee (direct cost) $1,094 Late Commercial Application Fee (direct cost) $1,204 Page 909 of 1339 Page 7 of 9 Nonprofit Application (direct cost) $729 Late Nonprofit Application (direct cost) $802 Commercial Long-term Agreement Application Fee (direct cost) $485 Nonprofit Long-term Agreement Application Fee (direct cost) $291 Public Hearing (direct cost) $38 plus publication costs Event Modification (direct cost) $114 Amplified Sound Permit (direct cost) $214 Commercial Pier Plaza Use Fee $14,574 per event day Nonprofit Pier Plaza Use Fee $9,076 per event day Event Vendor $115 per vendor, per day Hermosa Beach-based Event Vendor with Valid City Business License $86.25 per vendor, per day Event Setup/Teardown $330 per location, per day Parks and Recreation Staff (direct cost) $438 per day Reserved Parking Staging (direct cost) $207 Reserved Parking Space (direct cost) Fees vary based on parking location Refund/Cancellation Policy Once a permit is approved and issued, indirect costs may be refunded when written notice is given to the Parks and Recreation Department at least two weeks prior to the event date. Promotional Activation Program The Promotional Activation Program option provides organizations with a promotional opportunity on Pier Plaza or another mutually agreed-upon downtown location. These events must be strictly commercial in nature and are intended for brand awareness or product or service launches. Organizations wishing to host a promotional activation must submit a Special Event Application. Approval is granted administratively by the Parks and Recreation Director. More information can be found on the City website. Fee Waiver Grants To support qualified organizations that have received approval to hold an event, the City offers Fee Waiver Grant opportunities to help reduce the financial burden associated with City event fees. Events and organizations operating under a long-term agreement or other contractual agreement with the City are not subject to this policy. The annual allocation for Fee Waiver Grants shall be approved by the City Council each fall for the upcoming calendar year. Grants may be awarded in an amount up to $2,500 per event, or 50% of eligible indirect City event fees, whichever is less. Fee Waiver Grants may only be applied toward indirect costs charged by the City. Direct costs are not eligible for waiver and must be paid in full by the event producer. The minimum Fee Waiver Grant request shall be $250. Eligibility Event producers must be able to demonstrate how its event provides a unique benefit to the City, provide a large economic impact, and that a partial fee waiver would make a meaningful difference to the event producer’s ability to produce the event. Obligations Organizations approved for a Fee Waiver Grant shall be required to comply with the following: o Include the statement “is brought to you with support from the City of Hermosa Beach” on all event marketing materials. The City requests that this exact language be used. o A copy of the marketing materials containing this language must be submitted to the City prior to issuance of the Special Event Permit. o Provide a formal presentation to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission at a regular meeting no more than 60 days following the event. The presentation shall include discussion of the following: Page 910 of 1339 Page 8 of 9 ▪ Number of attendees. ▪ Beneficiary of funds raised by the event, if applicable. ▪ Overview of the event budget and financial outcome. ▪ Overview of the community benefit and/or positive economic impact to Hermosa Beach. Disqualification Failure to comply with the requirements of this policy shall automatically disqualify the organization from submitting a Fee Waiver Grant request for the remainder of the current calendar year and for one additional calendar year. If any information submitted as part of a Special Event Fee Waiver Grant request is found to be fraudulent, any event approvals already granted for the remainder of the calendar year shall be automatically revoked. While the organization may reapply for event approval in the following calendar year, it shall no longer be eligible to apply for a Fee Waiver Grant. Long-term Agreements The City of Hermosa Beach recognizes the value of hosting a variety of community events that contribute to a balanced and engaging events calendar for residents. To support long-term planning and consistency in event scheduling, eligible events may qualify for a Long-Term Agreement (LTA) with the City. Eligibility To be eligible for consideration of a Long-Term Agreement, the event must have been held in Hermosa Beach for at least three consecutive years. Term Limits LTA’s shall not exceed a maximum of three years, unless otherwise determined by the City Council. Procedures The following steps are required to guide the development and implementation of an LTA: 1. Submittal of an LTA Application 2. Review and approval by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission to begin LTA negotiations with City staff. 3. LTA negotiations and development. 4. Presentation of the final LTA to the City Council for approval. Obligations Organizations with approved LTAs must: • Provide a post-event presentation to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission within 60 days following the event. The presentation shall include attendance figures, community impacts, and a summary of successes and challenges; and • Include the following statement on all event marketing materials: “This event is brought to you with support from the City of Hermosa Beach.” • Submit copies of all marketing materials containing the required language to the City prior to issuance of the Special Event Permit. Page 911 of 1339 CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL EVENT POLICY GUIDE AND FEE UPDATES Page 912 of 1339 PROPOSED UPDATE Special Event Approval Guidelines •Current: o different application deadlines based on impact level or whether an event is new or returning.•Proposed Update: o all new events require applications to be in at least 90 days in advance, regardless of impact level o returning events requested to provide event dates by July 31 for the following calendar year and only reviewed by the Commission (unless otherwise directed by City Council or staff due to significant event changes) Page 913 of 1339 PROPOSED UPDATE Special Event Locations •Current: o Specific locations listed•Proposed Update: o Add language that allows for “special considerations for locations not listed above” Page 914 of 1339 PROPOSED UPDATE Special Event Limits •Current: o Peak season limits only apply to coastal locations; beach, Strand, Pier Plaza o Limits: 45 for impact level III, 25 for impact level II or I•Proposed Update: o Appy peak season limits city-wide o Increase impact level III limit to 50 o Align peak season start-end to HBMC: Saturday preceding Memorial Day to Labor Day Page 915 of 1339 PROPOSED UPDATE Fee Waiver Grant Eligibility •Staff’s Proposed Update: o Proposed ineligibility for events offering: Prize pools Cash rewards Participant compensation•Commission did not support Page 916 of 1339 PROPOSED UPDATE Fee Waiver Grant Eligibility •Current: o Event being classified as an Impact Level II or III with a minimum attendance of 5,000 or an event duration of at least two consecutive days. o Event producers must demonstrate: Financial need or economic justification Positive community benefit by meeting at least two community-based criteria related to: •supporting Hermosa Beach residents, schools, or businesses •Community support and participation •Broad public appeal •Recreational, cultural, social, or educational value •Promoting active and healthy lifestyles •Addressing unmet community needs•Proposed Update: o Approved events must: Provide a unique benefit to the City or community Generate significant economic impact Demonstrate that a partial fee waiver would meaningfully assist event Page 917 of 1339 PROPOSED UPDATE Long-term Agreement Program Procedures •Current: o LTA application submitted -Commission review and recommendation -City Council approval to begin negotiations -Staff negotiations and agreement development -Final LTA returned to City Council for approval•Proposed Update: o Remove City Council first approval step to begin negotiations o Authorize Commission to initiate LTA negotiations Page 918 of 1339 PROPOSED UPDATE Long-term Agreement Program Obligations •Current: o Organizations with an LTA must provide: Pre-event presentation to the Commission Post-event presentation to the Commission•Proposed Update: o Eliminate pre-event presentation requirement Retain post-event presentation only Page 919 of 1339 ADDITIONAL COMMISSION FEEDBACK •Remove all existing LTA eligibility criteria •Retain only requirement that an event must have occurred in Hermosa Beach for at least 3 consecutive years •Remove “Returning or New Event” classification in the Impact Characteristic Matrix Page 920 of 1339 PROPOSED FEE UPDATES OR ADDITONS P Modification: Events with participant plus spectator crowds less than 500 per event day: Commercial: $300 per location, per day Nonprofit: $250 per location, per day ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The current fee requires event producers to submit participant rosters and applies a rate of $2 per participant for non-profit events and 30% of registration costs for commercial events. Removal: Pass-through Application: $365 Addition: Late Commercial Application: $1,204 Late Nonprofit Application: $802 Addition: Commercial LTA Application: $485 Nonprofit LTA Application: $291 Addition: Reserved Parking Staging: $207 Addition: Event Modification: $114 Addition: Public Hearing: $38 plus costs of publication of public notice Addition: Nonprofit Pier Plaza Use Fee: $9,076 per event day Page 921 of 1339 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION Event Application & Review Process •Require all new events to apply at least 90 days in advance •Establish July 31 deadline for all returning events requesting dates for following year •Eliminate automatic public hearing requirement for new events •Eliminate automatic City Council review for returning Impact Level III events •Remove “Returning or New Event” classification from Impact Matrix Event Operations & Location Updates •Allow special consideration for event locations not listed in Policy Guide •Increase maximum Impact Level III peak-season event days from 45 to 50 days •Modify peak season start date to align with HBMC •Expand peak-season limits citywide rather than only coastal locations Fee Waiver Grant Program Updates •Proposed ineligibility for events offering prize pools, cash awards or participant compensation •Simplify eligibility criteria to focus on unique community benefit, economic impact and meaningful financial assistance to producer Long-Term Agreement (LTA) Updates •Eliminate City Council approval step to begin negotiations •Eliminate pre-event presentation requirement •Retain post-event reporting only •Simplify LTA eligibility to only be the event must have operated in Hermosa Beach for at least 3 consecutive years Approve proposed fee additions and updates Page 922 of 1339 Page 923 of 1339 Page 924 of 1339 Page 925 of 1339 Page 926 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 4 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-CMO-033 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council ENDORSEMENT OF ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES, INC’S (DBA ATHENS SERVICES) REQUEST FOR AN ANNUAL RATE ADJUSTMENT TO THE MAXIMUM RATES FOR SOLID WASTE SERVICES (Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Endorse the proposed service rate adjustment from Arakelian Enterprises, Inc. (DBA Athens Services) (“Athens Services”) at amounts not to exceed the attached rate schedule effective July 1, 2026; and 2. Adopt a resolution Approving the Annual Rate Adjustment to the Maximum Rates for Solid Waste Services Pursuant to the Integrated Solid Waste Management Services Agreement with Arakelian Enterprises, Inc. (DBA Athens Services) (Attachment 3). Executive Summary: The City entered into a contract on July 1, 2013, with Athens Services to provide residential and commercial waste disposal services for the City (“Agreement”); and extended the Agreement in December 2022 for an additional ten years. Per the Agreement, Athens Services may request an annual adjustment to the maximum rates by March 1 of each year. Rate adjustments are calculated in accordance with Section 6.4 of the Agreement and subject to City Council approval. If approved, the annual rate increase would become effective July 1, 2026; and result in a five percent increase in residential and commercial rates. The separate agreement with Athen Services for street sweeping services has a fixed annual rate increase of three percent. Background: Since entering into the Agreement with Athens Services effective July 1, 2013, annual solid waste rate adjustments have been implemented in accordance with the rate adjustment methodology contained in Section 6.4. The most recent annual rate increase was approved by City Council at its May 27, 2025, meeting. Page 927 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 4 At its December 13, 2022 meeting, City Council approved a ten -year extension and amendment to the agreements for solid waste and street sweeping and cleaning services. The amendment to the solid waste agreement included a change to the index used to calculate the annual rate adjustment. Previously, the annual rate adjustment was based on various Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) and Producer Price Index (“PPI”). Per the amendment, annual rate adjustments will be calculated based on only the Trash CPI plus one percent. As part of the ten-year contract extension and amendment, an extraordinary rate increase was approved and was implemented in three phases occurring on January 1, 2023, July 1, 2023, and July 1, 2024. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description October 12, 2010 Approved Agreement with Athens Services for Street Sweeping and Cleaning Services March 26, 2013 Approved Agreement with Athens Services) September 10, 2019 Approved special rate increase for Organics Recycling Service May 25, 2021 Approved Seventh Annual Rate Adjustment May 10, 2022 Considered proposal from Athens for contract extension and amendment and directed staff to negotiate with Athens May 24, 2022 Approved Eighth Annual Rate Adjustment October 25, 2022 Approved proposal for amendment and extension of contract with Athens Services December 13, 2022 Held public hearing on proposed customer rates for new Athens Services contract extension and amendment May 23, 2023 Approved annual rate adjustment including second installment of extraordinary rate adjustment May 28, 2024 Approved annual rate adjustment including third and final installment of extraordinary rate adjustment May 27, 2025 Approved annual rate adjustment Discussion: The Agreement prescribes the format by which Athens Services can reques t an annual rate adjustment. Rate years run from July 1 through June 30 of the following year. In order to consider an annual rate adjustment for an upcoming rate year, Athens Services must submit a written request to the City by March 1 of each year. Page 928 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 4 Staff reviewed the annual rate adjustment request dated February 27, 2026, and accompanying letter submitted May 1, 2026 (Attachment 1), according to the rate adjustment methodology outlined in Section 6.4 of the Agreement. The rate adjustment calculations were previously performed separately for the three service categories consisting of single-family service carts, multi-family and commercial service bins, and roll-off bins. The new adjustment formula is based solely on the Trash CPI plus one additional percentage. The Trash CPI index for the period of March 2025 to March 2026 increased by four percent. Staff reviewed the rate schedules and calculations and confirmed that the rate adjustments were made in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Staff confirmed the accuracy of the indices and that the rate adjustment formulas are correctly applied to the rates. Based on the rate adjustment methods and prescribed formulas, the City’s net residential and commercial rate would increase on July 1, 2026, by five percent. This includes the CPI index increase of four percent, plus one percent per the approved adjustment formula. Simultaneously, per a separate a greement between Athens and the City, street sweeping rates paid by the City will also increase by a fixed three percent annually on July 1 (Attachment 1). Per the Agreement, Athens Services will notify all customers of the rate adjustment at least 30 days in advance of the effective date of the adjustment, July 1, 2026. Fiscal Impact: Rate increases affect the franchise fees paid by Athens Services to the City. The impact of the five percent adjustment would result in an increase of approximately $30,000 in franchise fees paid to the City. The impact of the rate increase on the most common service levels is shown here: 3-Yard Bin serviced once per week Residential 64-Gallon Trash and 35- gallon organics cart Current Rate $331.45 $32.31 Proposed Rate $347.86 $33.91 The increase of three percent for street sweeping and cleaning services has been included in the 2026–27 Preliminary Budget. Page 929 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 4 Attachments: 1. Rate adjustment request letters from Athens Services for Solid Waste Services and Street Sweeping and Cleaning Services 2. Proposed Rates 3. Resolution Respectfully Submitted by: Douglas Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 930 of 1339 P.O. Box 60009, City of Industry, CA 91716 (888) 336-6100 April 30, 2026 City of Hermosa Beach Steve Napolitano, City Manager 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Annual Request to Adjust the Maximum Rates Effective July 1, 2026 Mr. Napolitano: Per our original letter dated February 26, 2026, we are following up to provide the rate adjustment calculations and rate sheets to be effective July 1, 2026. Per Section 6.4.2 in Amendment #2, the annual rate adjustment is based on the percentage increase in the Trash CPI for the prior 12-month period (March of the prior year to March of the current year) plus 1%. The change in the Trash CPI from March 2025 to March 2026 was 4.00%. Adding 1.00% to the CPI results in a total rate adjustment of 5.00% for all rates to be effective July 1, 2026. Please handle the administrative processing of this request to make the rates effective July 1, 2026. In addition, upon your review and approval, please send an email or letter by mail indicating your approval of this rate adjustment. Upon our receipt of your approval, we will update our billing records and billing system to reflect this rate adjustment effective with the July 1, 2026 billing. As always, we appreciate your assistance & support. Please feel free to call me at (626) 255-6174 with any questions or to discuss. Sincerely, Christian Warner SVP of Market Intelligence & Contract Compliance Encl: CC: Doug Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager, City of Hermosa Beach Page 931 of 1339 Monthly Residential Cart Service Rates Net Rate AB939 Collector Fee Total Rate Standard Service includes one refuse cart and one or more recycling carts. Green waste carts are provided on a subscription basis. Cart Size: Standard Service - based upon refuse cart size 20-gallon $12.03 $0.25 $1.34 $13.62 35-gallon $14.11 $0.25 $1.57 $15.93 64-gallon $22.54 $0.25 $2.50 $25.29 96-gallon $30.91 $0.25 $3.43 $34.59 Additional Refuse Cart - above one 35-gallon $8.38 $0.00 $0.93 $9.31 64-gallon $12.63 $0.00 $1.40 $14.03 96-gallon $16.82 $0.00 $1.87 $18.69 Each Yard Waste Cart 35-gallon $7.76 $0.00 $0.86 $8.62 64-gallon $8.86 $0.00 $0.99 $9.85 96-gallon $9.90 $0.00 $1.10 $11.00 Alternative "Can" Service (if carts not feasible) - Equivalent cart rates based on capacity Active Military Rate Reduction - above rates reduced by 25% Senior Low Income Discount - above rates (excluding 20-gallon rate) reduced by 10% Other Cart Rates and Services (Charged in Addition to Monthly Cart Service Rates) Walk-out Service - upon request $8.38 $0.00 $0.93 $9.31 Walk-out Service - authorized disabled customers $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No charge Additional Special Overage Pickup for Automated Cart Customers $10.50 $0.00 $1.17 $11.67 (in excess of six pickups per year) Additional Bulky Item pickups (in excess of two free pickups per $63.04 $0.00 $7.01 $70.05 dwelling unit per year) Cart Exchanges (in excess of free exchanges to be provided)$31.54 $0.00 $3.50 $35.04 Returned Check (NSF) Fee (applicable to all customers)$46.43 $0.00 $5.16 $51.59 Credit Card Declined Fee (applicable to all customers)$46.43 $0.00 $5.16 $51.59 Optional HHW Door-to-Door Collection - per dwelling unit $0.94 $0.00 $0.10 $1.04 * Including all City fees, including $0.25/home/month AB939 fee. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAXIMUM RATES Effective July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 Page 932 of 1339 Extra Container Size 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 Empty Refuse 32-gallon cart (2)$75.01 $131.28 $184.46 $240.79 $293.88 $350.16 $437.68 $46.39 64-gallon cart (2)$118.81 $206.48 $291.01 $375.52 $460.06 $547.71 $679.00 $46.39 96-gallon cart (2)$162.60 $272.21 $381.88 $491.56 $601.07 $710.76 $820.39 $46.39 1 yard bin $221.69 $332.93 $447.78 $559.19 $667.08 $781.89 $913.88 $130.84 1.5 yard bin $246.32 $371.99 $528.69 $623.30 $745.56 $998.74 $1,169.31 $130.84 2 yard bin $298.59 $459.23 $623.33 $784.09 $920.56 $1,060.66 $1,238.62 $130.84 3 yard bin $347.86 $537.19 $723.10 $912.46 $1,098.28 $1,284.18 $1,508.04 $168.19 4 yard bin $417.86 $642.73 $970.97 $1,095.97 $1,320.87 $1,549.15 $1,811.93 $168.19 6 yard bin $523.43 $805.61 $1,091.22 $1,373.42 $1,659.10 $1,941.23 $2,271.75 $168.19 8 yard bin $649.58 $1,002.88 $1,345.84 $1,685.32 $2,011.11 $2,354.00 $2,758.92 $199.04 Recycling 18-gallon cart (3)$23.95 32-gallon cart (3)$37.41 $65.47 $91.96 $119.99 $146.58 $174.65 $221.46 $23.12 64-gallon cart (3)$59.27 $102.80 $144.96 $187.11 $229.16 $272.79 $338.23 $23.12 96-gallon cart (3)$81.03 $135.63 $190.20 $244.72 $299.29 $353.88 $408.38 $23.12 1 yard bin $99.76 $149.65 $201.09 $250.96 $299.29 $350.71 $410.03 $58.75 1.5 yard bin $110.67 $166.81 $236.91 $279.07 $333.59 $447.38 $523.78 $58.75 2 yard bin $134.07 $205.78 $279.07 $350.71 $411.54 $473.91 $553.38 $58.75 3 yard bin $155.87 $240.11 $322.65 $406.86 $489.52 $572.05 $671.81 $75.31 4 yard bin $187.11 $286.82 $433.41 $487.86 $587.63 $688.99 $805.90 $75.31 Locking Bin Service $17.21 $34.43 $51.64 $68.85 $86.07 $103.28 $120.49 Cart Push-out 10-50 FT $18.19 $36.38 $54.57 $72.76 $90.95 $109.14 $127.33 Cart Push-out 51-100 FT $23.61 $47.22 $70.83 $94.44 $118.05 $141.66 $165.27 Cart Push-out 101-150 FT $30.71 $61.42 $92.13 $122.84 $153.55 $184.26 $214.97 Cart Push-out 151+$39.92 $79.84 $119.76 $159.68 $199.60 $239.52 $279.44 Bin Scout 10-50 FT $36.35 $72.70 $109.05 $145.40 $181.75 $218.10 $254.45 Bin Scout 51-100 FT $47.25 $94.50 $141.75 $189.00 $236.25 $283.50 $330.75 Bin Scout 101-150 FT $61.43 $122.86 $184.29 $245.72 $307.15 $368.58 $430.01 Bin Scout 151+$79.84 $159.68 $239.52 $319.36 $399.20 $479.04 $558.88 (1) Including all City fees. (2) Applicable to businesses. All residential cart customers are charged in accordance with the Residential Cart Service Rates. (3) Not applicable to residents with cart refuse service; such customers receive recycling service at no additional charge. n/a CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAXIMUM RATES Effective July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 Monthly Bin GROSS Rates (1) Pickups per week Page 933 of 1339 Roll-off Box Charges Net Rate AB939 Collector Fee Total Rate Roll-off Box Service - Pull Plus Dump Standard Roll-off Box (any size) - Rate/pull (incl. delivery & rental)$485.39 $10.00 $53.93 $549.32 Compactor roll-off box - Rate per pull - 20 yard compactor $547.38 $5.00 $60.82 $613.20 - 30 yard compactor $547.38 $7.50 $60.82 $615.70 - 40 yard compactor $547.38 $10.00 $60.82 $618.20 Compactor Monthly Lease $1,428.40 $0.00 $158.71 $1,587.11 Per Ton Rate $177.90 $0.00 $19.77 $197.67 Per Ton Rate - Pier Compactor Roll-off Only, for composting $187.80 $0.00 $20.87 $208.67 Per day rental after 7 days without a pull $28.28 $0.00 $3.14 $31.42 Additional Roll-off Box Fees Overweight charge (per ton over ten tons/load) Dry run/redlivery/return trip/relocation fee)$141.43 $0.00 $15.72 $157.15 * Including all City fees, inclusive of AB939 fees. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAXIMUM RATES Effective July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 25% of Per Ton Rate Page 934 of 1339 Additional Service Charges Net Rate AB939 Collector Fee Total Rate Porter Service (total to be shared by affected customers per Sec 4.1.14)$15,991.69 $0.00 $1,776.85 $17,768.54 Commercial Bulky Item Pickup: - 1 to 2 items $79.42 $0.00 $8.82 $88.24 - 3 to 5 items $158.78 $0.00 $17.64 $176.42 - 6 to 10 items $317.56 $0.00 $35.29 $352.85 - Each additional item on same pickup $79.42 $0.00 $8.82 $88.24 Bin Return Trip / Dry Run Fee $145.39 $0.00 $16.16 $161.55 Bin Re-delivery Fee (if bins are pulled for non-payment)$130.83 $0.00 $14.54 $145.37 Bin Cleaning (over once per year)$116.34 $0.00 $12.93 $129.27 3-yard Temporary Bin - Per dump (delivery, disposal and 7-day rental included)$287.67 $0.75 $31.96 $320.38 - Rental per day after 7 days without a dump $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Special Event Litter Boxes - Rate per box $13.09 $0.00 $1.46 $14.55 - Rate per box of 200 liners $145.39 $0.00 $16.16 $161.55 Emergency Service Rates - one crew and one collection truck $247.12 $0.00 $27.46 $274.58 * Including all City fees, inclusive of AB939 fees. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAXIMUM RATES Effective July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 Page 935 of 1339 Rates for Additional Services Net Rate AB939 Collector Fee Total Rate All Accounts: Stop Service Charge $63.71 $0.00 $7.08 $70.79 All Accounts: Resume Charge $63.71 $0.00 $7.08 $70.79 All Accounts: Stand-By Time (each portion of 15 minutes)$63.71 $0.00 $7.08 $70.79 All Accounts: Shred Services $81.90 $0.00 $9.10 $91.00 Commercial: Bin Excess Waste $78.98 $0.00 $8.78 $87.76 Commercial: Bin Excess Weight $78.98 $0.00 $8.78 $87.76 Commercial: Bin Delivery $108.60 $0.00 $12.07 $120.67 Commercial: Bin Removal $108.60 $0.00 $12.07 $120.67 Commercial: Bin Exchange $167.87 $0.00 $18.65 $186.52 Commercial: Bin Exchange with Metal Lids $227.12 $0.00 $25.24 $252.36 Commercial: Lock Lid One-Time Set-Up (per lock)$78.98 $0.00 $8.78 $87.76 Commercial: On-Call Bin Rental $167.87 $0.00 $18.65 $186.52 Commercial: Custom Bin Fabrication (per cubic yard)$444.35 $0.00 $49.37 $493.72 Compactor: Repair (per hour, plus parts)$207.35 $0.00 $23.04 $230.39 Compactor: Wash-Out $493.70 $0.00 $54.86 $548.56 Residential: Dead-Run or Go-Back $45.51 $0.00 $5.06 $50.57 Residential: Bulky Item Dead-Run or Go-Back $72.79 $0.00 $8.09 $80.88 Residential: Compost Bin Delivery $76.46 $0.00 $8.50 $84.96 Residential: Worm Bin Delivery $149.25 $0.00 $16.58 $165.83 Roll-Off: Plastic Liners $78.98 $0.00 $8.78 $87.76 Roll-Off: Roll-Top Monthly Rental $108.60 $0.00 $12.07 $120.67 Roll-Off: Box Monthly Rental (permanent accounts)$385.11 $0.00 $42.79 $427.90 Roll-Off: Impound of Illegal Box (plus disposal)$1,678.63 $0.00 $186.52 $1,865.15 Roll-Off: Per Ton Disposal Rate - C& D $167.87 $0.00 $18.65 $186.52 Roll-Off: Per Ton Disposal Rate - Wood $133.32 $0.00 $14.81 $148.13 Roll-Off: Per Ton Disposal Rate - Organics $227.12 $0.00 $25.24 $252.36 Roll-Off: Per Ton Disposal Rate - Concrete $167.87 $0.00 $18.65 $186.52 Roll-Off: Per Ton Disposal Rate - Inerts $133.32 $0.00 $0.00 $148.13 Storage Box: Delivery $266.59 $0.00 $29.62 $296.21 Storage Box: Removal $266.59 $0.00 $29.62 $296.21 Temporary Bin: 3 Yard Recycling - Delivery $286.34 $0.00 $31.82 $318.16 Temporary Bin: 3 Yard Recycling - Removal/Dump $286.34 $0.00 $31.82 $318.16 Temporary Bin: 3 Yard Trash with Scout - Delivery $315.98 $0.00 $35.11 $351.09 Temporary Bin: 3 Yard Trash with Scout - Removal/Dump $315.98 $0.00 $35.11 $351.09 Temporary Bin: Extra Days (with no dump within one week)$23.71 $0.00 $2.63 $26.34 Temporary Bin: Lock Lid One-Time Set-Up (per lock)$78.98 $0.00 $8.78 $87.76 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAXIMUM RATES Effective July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 Page 936 of 1339 Series Id: Series Title: Area: Item: Base Period: Years: Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014 422.440 422.483 423.413 425.393 425.242 425.930 426.562 426.771 427.327 427.995 427.808 428.187 2015 427.734 429.248 429.235 429.807 431.234 430.813 431.229 432.967 433.843 434.829 436.428 436.996 2016 437.205 438.296 437.699 437.676 438.317 437.858 438.607 439.358 439.707 440.311 443.343 444.745 2017 446.266 447.699 446.987 447.129 447.272 448.046 448.328 448.717 449.008 452.196 453.820 453.596 2018 453.354 454.915 455.230 458.722 462.887 465.041 465.579 470.457 471.026 472.535 486.650 485.935 2019 475.687 477.474 478.569 479.449 480.865 480.984 482.138 483.987 484.346 486.133 486.485 486.708 2020 491.003 494.429 495.288 494.432 494.946 496.679 498.564 500.882 501.756 503.315 504.970 508.190 2021 512.722 517.270 518.505 518.579 516.440 517.202 521.185 524.408 529.934 530.114 529.053 532.538 2022 533.078 538.313 540.719 542.564 544.546 547.554 548.187 548.706 558.254 561.090 563.816 565.185 2023 570.412 575.697 576.773 580.124 587.431 589.812 596.167 597.347 596.997 597.569 601.631 602.164 2024 606.773 610.551 610.015 611.073 609.538 611.946 614.089 615.880 619.640 621.632 627.127 627.807 2025 629.803 641.938 642.053 643.063 646.507 648.477 652.682 656.067 652.831 655.705 658.242 2026 661.093 665.893 667.754 667.754 CPI - CY 642.053 CPI - PY 25.701 Chng - # 642.053 CPI - PY 4.00%Chng - % 1.00%Plus 1 5.00%Subtotal U.S. city average Garbage and trash collection DECEMBER 1983=100 2014 to 2026 Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) Original Data Value CUUR0000SEHG02,CUUS0000SEHG02 Not Seasonally Adjusted Garbage and trash collection in U.S. city average, all Page 937 of 1339 P.O. Box 60009, City of Industry, CA 91716 (888) 336-6100 February 26, 2026 City of Hermosa Beach Steve Napolitano, City Manager 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Annual Request to Adjust the Maximum Rates Effective July 1, 2026 Mr. Napolitano: In accordance with our Integrated Solid Waste Management Services Agreement (Agreement) with the City of Hermosa Beach, and pursuant to Amendment #2 of this Agreement, please accept this letter as Athens Services request to adjust the maximum rates for Waste Management services, to be effective July 1, 2026. Per Section 6.4.2 in Amendment #2, the annual rate adjustment is based on the percentage increase in the Trash CPI for the prior 12-month period (March of the prior year to March of the current year) plus 1%. The March 2026 Trash CPI index will not be published until mid-April 2026. In addition, per Section 6.3.1 of the original Agreement, we must submit our annual rate adjustment request in writing by March 1 of each year. With the March 2026 Trash CPI index not being published until April, we are not able to provide the specific rate adjustment calculations with this letter. However, we will provide you with a subsequent letter in April with the specific rate adjustment calculations, as soon as the March 2026 Trash CPI index is published. This letter (submitted on February 26, 2026) will serve as our official request to adjust rates on July 1, 2026. As always, we appreciate your assistance & support. Please feel free to call me at (626) 855-7230 with any questions or to discuss. Sincerely, Christian Warner SVP of Market Intelligence & Contract Compliance CC: Doug Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager, City of Hermosa Beach Page 938 of 1339 P.O. Box 60009, City of Industry, CA 91716 (888) 336-6100 February 26, 2026 City of Hermosa Beach Steve Napolitano, City Manager 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Annual Rate Adjustment to the Street-Sweeping Contract Mr. Napolitano: In accordance with our Street Sweeping Agreement (Agreement) with the City of Hermosa Beach, and pursuant to the First Amendment of this Agreement, please accept this letter as Athens Services request to adjust the rates for Street Sweeping & Cleaning services tied to this Agreement, to be effective July 1, 2026. Per the First Amendment, this Agreement includes a provision to increase rates by an agreed flat rate of 3% every July 1. As this request is consistent with the Agreement, we will adjust the rates by 3% on our monthly invoices to the City, to be effective with July 2026 services. Please feel free to call me at (626) 855-7230 with any questions or to discuss. Sincerely, Christian Warner SVP of Market Intelligence & Contract Compliance CC: Doug Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager, City of Hermosa Beach Page 939 of 1339 Monthly Residential Cart Service Rates Net Rate Total Rate Standard Service includes one refuse cart and one or more recycling carts. Green waste carts are provided on a subscription basis. Cart Size: Standard Service - based upon refuse cart size 20-gallon $13.62 35-gallon $15.93 64-gallon $25.29 96-gallon $34.59 Additional Refuse Cart - above one 35-gallon $9.31 64-gallon $14.03 96-gallon $18.69 Each Yard Waste Cart 35-gallon $8.62 64-gallon $9.85 96-gallon $11.00 Alternative "Can" Service (if carts not feasible) - Equivalent cart rates based on capacity Active Military Rate Reduction - above rates reduced by 25% Senior Low Income Discount - above rates (excluding 20-gallon rate) reduced by 10% Other Cart Rates and Services (Charged in Addition to Monthly Cart Service Rates) Walk-out Service - upon request $9.31 Walk-out Service - authorized disabled customers No charge Additional Special Overage Pickup for Automated Cart Customers $11.67 (in excess of six pickups per year) Additional Bulky Item pickups (in excess of two free pickups per $70.05 dwelling unit per year) Cart Exchanges (in excess of free exchanges to be provided) $35.04 Returned Check (NSF) Fee (applicable to all customers) $51.59 Credit Card Declined Fee (applicable to all customers) $51.59 Optional HHW Door-to-Door Collection - per dwelling unit $1.04 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAXIMUM RATES Effective July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 Page 940 of 1339 Extra Container Size 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 Empty Refuse 32-gallon cart (2) $75.01 $131.28 $184.46 $240.79 $293.88 $350.16 $437.68 $46.39 64-gallon cart (2) $118.81 $206.48 $291.01 $375.52 $460.06 $547.71 $679.00 $46.39 96-gallon cart (2) $162.60 $272.21 $381.88 $491.56 $601.07 $710.76 $820.39 $46.39 1 yard bin $221.69 $332.93 $447.78 $559.19 $667.08 $781.89 $913.88 $130.84 1.5 yard bin $246.32 $371.99 $528.69 $623.30 $745.56 $998.74 $1,169.31 $130.84 2 yard bin $298.59 $459.23 $623.33 $784.09 $920.56 $1,060.66 $1,238.62 $130.84 3 yard bin $347.86 $537.19 $723.10 $912.46 $1,098.28 $1,284.18 $1,508.04 $168.19 4 yard bin $417.86 $642.73 $970.97 $1,095.97 $1,320.87 $1,549.15 $1,811.93 $168.19 6 yard bin $523.43 $805.61 $1,091.22 $1,373.42 $1,659.10 $1,941.23 $2,271.75 $168.19 8 yard bin $649.58 $1,002.88 $1,345.84 $1,685.32 $2,011.11 $2,354.00 $2,758.92 $199.04 Recycling 18-gallon cart (3) $23.95 32-gallon cart (3) $37.41 $65.47 $91.96 $119.99 $146.58 $174.65 $221.46 $23.12 64-gallon cart (3) $59.27 $102.80 $144.96 $187.11 $229.16 $272.79 $338.23 $23.12 96-gallon cart (3) $81.03 $135.63 $190.20 $244.72 $299.29 $353.88 $408.38 $23.12 1 yard bin $99.76 $149.65 $201.09 $250.96 $299.29 $350.71 $410.03 $58.75 1.5 yard bin $110.67 $166.81 $236.91 $279.07 $333.59 $447.38 $523.78 $58.75 2 yard bin $134.07 $205.78 $279.07 $350.71 $411.54 $473.91 $553.38 $58.75 3 yard bin $155.87 $240.11 $322.65 $406.86 $489.52 $572.05 $671.81 $75.31 4 yard bin $187.11 $286.82 $433.41 $487.86 $587.63 $688.99 $805.90 $75.31 Locking Bin Service $17.21 $34.43 $51.64 $68.85 $86.07 $103.28 $120.49 Cart Push-out 10-50 FT $18.19 $36.38 $54.57 $72.76 $90.95 $109.14 $127.33 Cart Push-out 51-100 FT $23.61 $47.22 $70.83 $94.44 $118.05 $141.66 $165.27 Cart Push-out 101-150 FT $30.71 $61.42 $92.13 $122.84 $153.55 $184.26 $214.97 Cart Push-out 151+ $39.92 $79.84 $119.76 $159.68 $199.60 $239.52 $279.44 Bin Scout 10-50 FT $36.35 $72.70 $109.05 $145.40 $181.75 $218.10 $254.45 Bin Scout 51-100 FT $47.25 $94.50 $141.75 $189.00 $236.25 $283.50 $330.75 Bin Scout 101-150 FT $61.43 $122.86 $184.29 $245.72 $307.15 $368.58 $430.01 Bin Scout 151+ $79.84 $159.68 $239.52 $319.36 $399.20 $479.04 $558.88 (1) Applicable to businesses. All residential cart customers are charged in accordance with the Residential Cart Service Rates. (2) Not applicable to residents with cart refuse service; such customers receive recycling service at no additional charge. n/a CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAXIMUM RATES Effective July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 Monthly Bin GROSS Rates Pickups per week Page 941 of 1339 Roll-off Box Charges Net RateTotal Rate Roll-off Box Service - Pull Plus Dump Standard Roll-off Box (any size) - Rate/pull (incl. delivery & rental) $549.32 Compactor roll-off box - Rate per pull - 20 yard compactor $613.20 - 30 yard compactor $615.70 - 40 yard compactor $618.20 Compactor Monthly Lease $1,587.11 Per Ton Rate $197.67 Per Ton Rate - Pier Compactor Roll-off Only, for composting $208.67 Per day rental after 7 days without a pull $31.42 Additional Roll-off Box Fees Overweight charge (per ton over ten tons/load) Dry run/redlivery/return trip/relocation fee) $157.15 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAXIMUM RATES Effective July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 Page 942 of 1339 Additional Service Charges Total Rate Porter Service (total to be shared by affected customers per Sec 4.1.14)$17,768.54 Commercial Bulky Item Pickup: - 1 to 2 items $88.24 - 3 to 5 items $176.42 - 6 to 10 items $352.85 - Each additional item on same pickup $88.24 Bin Return Trip / Dry Run Fee $161.55 Bin Re-delivery Fee (if bins are pulled for non-payment) $145.37 Bin Cleaning (over once per year) $129.27 3-yard Temporary Bin - Per dump (delivery, disposal and 7-day rental included) $320.38 - Rental per day after 7 days without a dump $0.00 Special Event Litter Boxes - Rate per box $14.55 - Rate per box of 200 liners $161.55 Emergency Service Rates - one crew and one collection truck $274.58 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAXIMUM RATES Effective July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 Page 943 of 1339 Rates for Additional Services Total Rate All Accounts: Stop Service Charge $70.79 All Accounts: Resume Charge $70.79 All Accounts: Stand-By Time (each portion of 15 minutes) $70.79 All Accounts: Shred Services $91.00 Commercial: Bin Excess Waste $87.76 Commercial: Bin Excess Weight $87.76 Commercial: Bin Delivery $120.67 Commercial: Bin Removal $120.67 Commercial: Bin Exchange $186.52 Commercial: Bin Exchange with Metal Lids $252.36 Commercial: Lock Lid One-Time Set-Up (per lock) $87.76 Commercial: On-Call Bin Rental $186.52 Commercial: Custom Bin Fabrication (per cubic yard) $493.72 Compactor: Repair (per hour, plus parts) $230.39 Compactor: Wash-Out $548.56 Residential: Dead-Run or Go-Back $50.57 Residential: Bulky Item Dead-Run or Go-Back $80.88 Residential: Compost Bin Delivery $84.96 Residential: Worm Bin Delivery $165.83 Roll-Off: Plastic Liners $87.76 Roll-Off: Roll-Top Monthly Rental $120.67 Roll-Off: Box Monthly Rental (permanent accounts) $427.90 Roll-Off: Impound of Illegal Box (plus disposal) $1,865.15 Roll-Off: Per Ton Disposal Rate - C&D $186.52 Roll-Off: Per Ton Disposal Rate - Wood $148.13 Roll-Off: Per Ton Disposal Rate - Organics $252.36 Roll-Off: Per Ton Disposal Rate - Concrete $186.52 Roll-Off: Per Ton Disposal Rate - Inerts $148.13 Storage Box: Delivery $296.21 Storage Box: Removal $296.21 Temporary Bin: 3 Yard Recycling - Delivery $318.16 Temporary Bin: 3 Yard Recycling - Removal/Dump $318.16 Temporary Bin: 3 Yard Trash with Scout - Delivery $351.09 Temporary Bin: 3 Yard Trash with Scout - Removal/Dump $351.09 Temporary Bin: Extra Days (with no dump within one week) $26.34 Temporary Bin: Lock Lid One-Time Set-Up (per lock) $87.76 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAXIMUM RATES Effective July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 Page 944 of 1339 Page 1 of 4 RES-26-XXXX CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESOLUTION NO. 26-XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING THE ANNUAL RATE ADJUSTMENT TO THE MAXIMUM RATES FOR SOLID WASTE SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. (DBA ATHENS SERVICES) WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) is authorized to provide for the collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste within its jurisdiction pursuant to its police power under the California Constitution (Section 7 of Article XI) and applicable provisions of state law; and WHEREAS, the City entered into an Integrated Solid Waste Management Services Agreement as amended (“Agreement”) with Arakelian Enterprises, Inc., dba Athens Services (“Athens”) effective July 1, 2013 to provide solid waste collection services to residential and commercial customers; and WHEREAS, the Agreement authorizes Athens to request annual adjustments to the maximum rates charged to customers based on a defined formula, subject to City Council approval; and WHEREAS, the Agreement provides that annual rate adjustments shall be calculated based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) for Trash and Garbage Collection, plus one additional percent; and WHEREAS, the City conducted a Proposition 218 proceeding on December 13, 2022, and provided notice to property owners and ratepayers regarding proposed solid waste rates, including disclosure of future annual CPI-based adjustments; and WHEREAS, following the Proposition 218 proceeding, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the solid waste rate structure (including formula- based annual CPI adjustments); and WHEREAS, Athens submitted a timely request for an annual rate adjustment for FY 2026–2027 in accordance with the Agreement; and Page 945 of 1339 Page 2 of 4 RES-26-XXXX WHEREAS, City staff reviewed the requested adjustment and determined that it complies with the formula and methodology set forth in the Agreement and the previously approved rate structure; and WHEREAS, the proposed adjustment results in an approximate five percent (5%) increase in maximum rates effective July 1, 2026; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve the annual adjustment as required under the Agreement and consistent with the previously approved rate structure. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. Approval of Annual Rate Adjustment. The City Council hereby approves the annual adjustment to the maximum solid waste service rates effective July 1, 2026, as set forth in the rate schedule (attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference) and as calculated pursuant to Section 6.4 of the Agreement. SECTION 3. Findings. The City Council hereby finds and declares as follows: a. Prior Proposition 218 Compliance. The City previously complied with Proposition 218 (Article XIII D of the California Constitution) by providing notice and conducting a public hearing regarding solid waste service rates, including disclosure of the methodology for annual CPI-based adjustments. b. Implementation of Approved Rate Structure. The annual rate adjustment approved herein constitutes implementation of a previously approved rate structure and formula, and does not establish a new or increased fee requiring a new Proposition 218 notice and protest hearing. c. Formula-Based Adjustment. The rate adjustment is calculated pursuant to a formula based on the percentage change in the applicable CPI for Trash and Garbage Collection, plus one percent, as authorized in the Agreement and previously disclosed to ratepayers. The City Council finds Page 946 of 1339 Page 3 of 4 RES-26-XXXX that the CPI percentage applied reflects the year-over-year change in the applicable index for the period used by the City and its consultant, and that the methodology used is consistent with the Agreement. d. Within Authorized Time Period. The adjustment falls within the authorized multi-year period for CPI-based adjustments. Although prior materials referenced a longer authorization period, the City is currently within a five-year period consistent with California Government Code section 53756; and therefore within a legally defensible timeframe for implementation of formula- based adjustments. e. No Structural Changes. The City is not modifying the rate structure, cost allocation methodology, service levels, or fee components, and is not imposing any new charges. f. Cost of Service. The adjusted rates continue to reflect the reasonable cost of providing solid waste services and comply with the substantive requirements of the California Constitution (Section 6(b) of Article XIIID), including proportionality and cost-of-service limitations. SECTION 4. Ministerial Implementation Findings. The City Council further finds and declares: a. Ministerial Action. The approval of the annual rate adjustment is ministerial in nature and limited to verification that the adjustment complies with the formula set forth in the Agreement and previously approved rate structure. b. No Discretionary Rate-Setting. The City Council is not exercising independent discretion to establish new rates, but is implementing a contractual adjustment mechanism previously authorized. c. Contractual Compliance. Approval of the adjustment satisfies the City’s obligation under the Agreement to review and approve rate adjustments calculated in accordance with the contractual formula. SECTION 5. Legislative Findings. The City Council further finds that: (a) this action is a lawful exercise of the City’s police power and contractual authority; (b) the rate adjustment is not a tax but a fee for solid waste services; and (c) the action is consistent with applicable law and prior City approvals. Page 947 of 1339 Page 4 of 4 RES-26-XXXX SECTION 6. California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The City Council finds that this action is not a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15378(b)(4) and (5), as it involves a government funding mechanism and administrative activity that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment. SECTION 7. Severability. If any section or provision of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Resolution shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation. SECTION 8. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City; and make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council in the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. SECTION 9. Effective Date. This Resolution is effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this 26th day of May 2026. ______________________________________________________________________________ Mayor Mike Detoy PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________________ ________________________________ Martha Alvarez Jason Baltimore City Clerk Interim City Attorney Page 948 of 1339 HERMOSA BEACH ENDORSEMENT OF ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES, INC’S (DBA ATHENS SERVICES) REQUEST FOR AN ANNUAL RATE ADJUSTMENT TO THEMAXIMUM RATES FOR SOLID WASTE SERVICES Page 949 of 1339 BACKGROUND •The City entered into agreement with Athens Services in 2013 and extended the agreement for 10 additional years in 2022 •Per the contract,Athens may request annual rate adjustments of Trash CPI plus 1% •Athens submitted request letters in February 2026 Page 950 of 1339 BACKGROUND •Trash CPI from March 2025 -March 2026 was 4% •Rate adjustment will go into effect July 1 •Athens will provide notice on bills 30 days in advance •Separate street sweeping and cleaning agreement adjusts annually by fixed 3% Page 951 of 1339 DISCUSSION •Chart below shows effect of adjustment on the most common service levels Commercial 3-Yard Bin serviced once per week Residential 64-Gallon Trash and 35-gallon organics cart Current Rate $331.45 $32.31 Proposed Rate $347.86 $33.91 Page 952 of 1339 DISCUSSION •Adjustment will increase City’s franchise fees by approximately $30,000 annually •Staff recommends Council endorse the proposed rate adjustment and adopt the accompanying Resolution Page 953 of 1339 QUESTIONS Page 954 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-CMO-032 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council AWARD OF CONTRACT TO MOFFAT & NICHOL FOR PREPARATION OF A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PLAN. (Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Award a contract for Sea Level Rise Adaptation Planning to Moffat & Nichol at a not-to-exceed amount of $473,875 for a term of three years ending April 30, 2029; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest the proposed agreement (Attachment 2) subject to approval by the City Attorney. Executive Summary: Staff recommends Council award the contract to Moffat & Nichol for pr eparation of a Vulnerability Assessment and Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan, in compliance with SB 272, to be funded by a grant from the Ocean Protection Council. Background: In 2021, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill 1 (Atkins, 2021) into law. Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) directs the state to provide funding to local and regional governments to develop sea level rise adaptation plans and implementation projects. In 2022, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) awarded $37.5 million to the Ocean Protection Council (OPC) to support the implementation of SB 1. OPC is a cabinet-level state body that works jointly with state and federal agencies, NGOs, tribes and the public to ensure California maintains healthy, resilient, and productive ocean and coastal ecosystems. OPC’s SB 1 SLR Adaptation Planning Grant Program aims to provide funding for coastal communities to develop consistent SLR adaptation plans and projects to build resilience to SLR along the entire coast of California. In 2023, the California State Legislature passed SB 272 (Laird), Sea level rise: planning and adaptation. Senate Bill 272 requires local governments within the Coastal Zone and San Francisco Bay Area to develop a sea level rise plan by 2034, and makes these local governments eligible for prioritized funding. The bill aims to boost the state’s coastal resiliency by ensuring California’s coastal communities are planning for sea level rise, and by supporting implementation of sea level rise adaptation projects. Page 955 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 3 Staff applied for OPC funds for the development of a Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan (SLRAP) and Vulnerability Analysis (VA) in Spring of 2025. Shortly thereafter, OPC notified the City that it was successful in securing $583,307 in grant funds to develop these documents. The project will include comprehensive public engagement and coordination with regional stakeholders as needed. The project is estimated to take approximately three years and will also help inform the development of the City’s Local Coastal Plan development. It will include recommendations for possible implementation programs to address sea level rise and related threats to community safety. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description August 26, 2025 Approved a resolution approving application for, and acceptance of, grant funds from the Ocean Protection Council Discussion: On February 26, 2026, staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) seeking a qualified consultant to perform the development of Vulnerability Assessment and Sea Level Rise Adaptation plan. The consultant will lead the development of these plans which will include analysis of physical conditions and future climate scenarios, creation of a technical advisory committee to help guide the work, and robust public outreach over the course of 2-3 years. Proposals were due March 26 and four were received. City staff reviewed and scored the proposals and decided that Moffat & Nichol was the most qualified and competent proposer. The proposing firms are (in alphabetical order): - Blue Strike - Michael Baker - Moffat & Nichols - Somos The proposals were independently evaluated by a staff review panel and scored based on the following criteria: - Approach and Methods (35%) - Relevant Experience and Expertise (45%) - Cost and Administration (20%) Page 956 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 3 The evaluation sought firms with experience in similar projects for similar agencies with a responsible and responsive project manager that can ensure timely and efficient execution of the work. Moffat and Nichols exhibited the greatest knowledge of Hermosa Beach and its coastal issues. Their previous experience on a similar project in Hermosa Beach along with many similar projects along California’s coast showed them to be the preferred proposer. If approved by Council, the consultant will begin immediately, following contract execution, to develop the plan. Work will be done with close cooperation of City staff over the estimated 2-3 year project timeline. Fiscal Impact: The contract amount of $473,875 will be fully funded by the budgeted OPC SLRAP Grant. The OPC SLRAP grant of $583,307 is currently budgeted in the FY 2025 -26 budget in the 150 Grants Fund. Staff intends to apply the remaining $109,432 of the SLRAP grant award to cover applicable staff labor costs spent to support implementation of the grant. Agreement Request Agreement Request Amount Budget Account # Total Contract Amount Moffat Nichols $473,875 150-6001-4201 $473,875 Attachments: 1. Request for Proposals 2. Proposal and Draft Professional Services Agreement Respectfully Submitted by: Douglas Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 957 of 1339 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) #26-002 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PLAN IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 750-3603 Page 958 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 45 RFP NUMBER: RFP# 26-002 RFP TITLE: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PLAN REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: City Manager – Environmental Programs RELEASE DATE: February 26, 2026 DUE DATE: Thursday, March 26, 2026 @ 3:00 p.m. PST Notice is hereby given that the City Manager’s Office of the City of Hermosa Beach will receive proposals for: RFP# 26-002, VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PLAN Proposals must be submitted as PDF via the PlanetBids Portal (pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/51313/portal-home). Proposals will be received until 3:00 p.m. PST, Thursday, March 26, 2026. Proposals will not be opened at that time but will be submitted to the Public Works Department for verification and compliance with Specifications and subsequent recommendation to City Council for award of a contract or rejection of the responses, as deemed appropriate. The City reserves the right to make no award. Please direct any inquiries regarding this RFP to Douglas Krauss at dkrauss@hermosabeach.gov. All questions regarding the content of the proposal may be emailed to Douglas Krauss referenced above or submitted on the PlanetBids Portal. www.hermosabeach.gov BEACH HERMOSA OF CITY 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA, 90254 Phone: (310) 750-3603 Page 959 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 45 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Invitation for Proposals .................................................................................................... 4 1.2 RFP Timeline ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Submittal Procedures ...................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Protest Procedures........................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Contact ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.6 General RFP Conditions .................................................................................................. 6 2. Project Overview ................................................................................................................ 11 2.1 City Location and Characteristics................................................................................ 11 2.2 Objective and Goals..................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Relevant Plans, Policies, Programs, or Projects ........................................................... 11 3. Scope of Services ............................................................................................................... 12 4. Proposal Submittal Instructions .......................................................................................... 12 4.1 Proposal Format ............................................................................................................. 12 4.2 Proposal Content ........................................................................................................... 13 4.2.1 Cover Letter ............................................................................................................ 13 4.2.2 Firm Profile ............................................................................................................... 13 4.2.3 Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work ................................... 14 4.2.4 Project Management Plan .................................................................................... 15 4.2.5 Experience and Qualifications .............................................................................. 15 4.2.6 Required Forms ....................................................................................................... 17 4.2.7 Cost Proposal .......................................................................................................... 17 5. Proposal Evaluation and Selection .................................................................................... 18 5.1 Proposal Review Process .............................................................................................. 18 6. Contract Expectations ........................................................................................................ 20 6.1 Contract Period ............................................................................................................. 20 6.2 Professional Services Agreement ................................................................................. 20 6.3 Standards of Work ......................................................................................................... 20 6.4 Invoicing and Payment................................................................................................. 20 7. Attachments and Required Forms ..................................................................................... 21 7.1 Sample Professional Services Agreement ................................................................... 21 7.2 Required Forms .............................................................................................................. 41 7.2.1 Certification of Proposal......................................................................................... 41 7.2.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit ........................................................................................... 43 7.2.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements .......................................................... 44 7.2.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement .................................... 45 Page 960 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 45 1 Introduction 1.1 Invitation for Proposals The City of Hermosa Beach, Public Works Department is seeking proposals from qualified individuals or firms (“Consultant”) to develop and deliver a Vulnerability Assessment, Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan, and related materials to supplement a Local Coastal Plan in compliance with Senate Bill 272 (SB272) and as detailed in the Work Plan and Grant Agreement documents from the Ocean Protection Council (Exhibit 1). Consultants must have the expertise, experience, and demonstrate resources available to perform the work described in this request for proposals (RFP). Should an award be made, the selected Consultant(s) will enter into a professional services agreement with the City of Hermosa Beach to provide these services (draft attached). The City anticipates a contract start date around June 2026. 1.2 RFP Timeline RFP posted February 26, 2026 Deadline to submit written questions March 12, 2026 Posting of responses to questions March 16, 2026 Deadline to submit proposals March 26, 2026 - 3 PM PST Interviews for selected firms if the City wishes to do so TBD Tentative award May 12, 2026 1.3 Submittal Procedures Proposes shall submit one copy of the proposal and one copy of the fee schedule in PDF format on the PlanetBids Portal. No proposals will be accepted after the listed date and time. The format, content, and procedures for submitting a proposal are provided in further detail within the RFP. (Check Section 4 for complete submittal procedures) Page 961 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 45 1.4 Protest Procedures Proposers may file a “protest” of a proposal/statement of qualification with the City’s City Manager. In order for a Proposer’s protest to be considered valid, the protest must: A. Be filed in writing within five (5) calendar days after submittal deadline, or where the Protest relates solely to events occurring thereafter, within five (5) calendar days after the event or occurrence giving rise to the protest; B. Clearly identify the specific irregularity or accusation; C. Clearly identify the specific City staff determination or recommendation being protested; D. Specify in detail the grounds for protest and the facts supporting the protest; E. Include all relevant supporting documentation with the protest at time of filing; and F. Be transmitted concurrently to all other parties with a direct financial interest that may be adversely affected by the outcome of the protest. Such parties shall include all other Proposers or proposers who appear to have a reasonable prospect of receiving an award depending upon the outcome of the protest. If the protest does not comply with each of these requirements, the City may reject the protest with or without further review. If the protest is timely and complies with the above requirements, the City Manager, or other designated City staff member, shall review the protest, any response from the challenged Proposer(s), and all other relevant information, and will provide a written decision to the protestor. This administrative procedure and the time limits set forth herein are mandatory. Failure to comply with these mandatory procedures shall constitute a waiver of any right to pursue the protest, including filing a Government Code claim or any legal proceedings or actions. 1.5 Contact All questions regarding the content of the proposal must be submitted on the PlanetBids Portal. Responses to all questions will be posted on the PlanetBids Portal. Please direct any other inquiries regarding this RFP to Douglas Krauss at dkrauss@hermosabeach.gov. Page 962 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 of 45 1.6 General RFP Conditions The following instructions and conditions apply to this RFP: Pre-Contractual Expenses The City of Hermosa Beach shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by any consultant. In addition, no consultant shall include any such expenses as part of the price proposed. Pre-contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by bidders in: • Preparing a proposal in response to this RFP. • Submitting that proposal to the City of Hermosa Beach. • Negotiating with the City of Hermosa Beach any matter related to this RFP, proposal, and/or contractual agreement. • Any other expenses incurred by the consultant prior to the date of an executed contract. Authority to Withdraw RFP and/or Not Award Contract The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time for any reason without prior notice. Further, the City makes no representations that any agreement will be awarded to any consultant responding to this RFP. The City expressly reserves the right to reject any and all proposals in response to this RFP without indicating any reasons for such rejection(s). The release of this RFP does not obligate nor compel the City to enter into a contract or agreement. Authority to Revise RFP and Request Additional Information The City reserves the rights to amend the RFP at any time, to determine the successful respondent(s), and to reject any or all Proposals or their components. Should it be necessary for the City to issue addendums to this RFP during the proposal period, the City will post addendums to the PlanetBids Portal. It is the responsibility of all prospective proposers to check PlanetBids regularly to see whether any addenda or supplemental materials have been issued. Proposals shall acknowledge that the consultant is aware of all addendums which have been issued and has incorporated their provisions in their proposal by completing the Certification of Proposal Form. The City reserves the right, to request additional information or clarifications from consultants where it may serve the City’s best interest. Other Conditions Page 963 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 7 of 45 • ADDITIONAL SERVICES. The Scope of Work describes the minimum work to be accomplished. Upon final selection of the firm(s), the Scope of Work may be modified and refined during negotiations with the City. Any proposer that provides additional services can include those services in the proposal and list them as additional services. • AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES. Every proposal must be signed by the person or persons legally authorized to bind the consultant to a contract for the execution of the work. Upon request of the City, any agent submitting a proposal on behalf of a consultant shall provide a current power of attorney certifying the agent’s authority to bind the consultant. • AWARD OF PROPOSAL. City reserves the right to negotiate final terms with the selected consultant, if any. Award may be made to the consultant offering the most advantageous proposal after consideration of all criteria. • COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. All proposals shall comply with current federal, state, and other laws relative thereto. • CONFLICT OF INTEREST. By signing the Certification of Proposal, the consultant declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Qualifications, consultant declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. • DISQUALIFICATION OF PROPOSER. If there is reason to believe that collusion exists among the consultants, the City may refuse to consider proposals from participants in such collusion. No person, firm, or corporation under the same or different name, shall make, file, or be interested in more than one proposal for the same work unless alternate proposals are called for. Reasonable grounds for believing that any consultant is interested in more than one Proposal for the same work will cause the rejection of all Proposals for the work in which a consultant is interested. Consultants shall submit as part of their Proposal documents the completed Non-Collusion Affidavit. • EXAMINATION OF DOCUMENTS. It is the responsibility of the consultant to carefully and thoroughly examine and be familiar with these RFP documents, general conditions, all forms, specifications, drawings, plans, and addendums (if any). Consultants shall satisfy themselves as to the character, quantity, and quality of work to be performed and materials, labor, supervision necessary to perform the work as specified by these documents. The failure or neglect of the consultant to examine documents shall in no way relieve the consultant from any obligations with respect to the solicitation for and subsequent contract that may be awarded. Page 964 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 8 of 45 The submission of a proposal shall constitute an acknowledgment upon which the City may rely that the consultant has thoroughly examined and is familiar with the RFP documents. The failure or neglect of a consultant to receive or examine any of the documents shall in no way relieve the consultant from any obligations with respect to the proposal. No claim will be allowed for additional compensation that is based upon a lack of knowledge of any solicitation document. • INTERPRETATION OF RFP DOCUMENTS. City reserves the right to make corrections or clarifications of the information provided in this RFP. If any person is in doubt as to the true meaning of any part of this RFP documents, or finds discrepancies or omissions in the document, the person may submit to the City a written request for an interpretation or correction. Oral statement(s), interpretations or clarifications concerning meaning or intent of the contents of this RFP by any person are unauthorized and invalid. Modifications to the RFP, including, but not limited to the scope of work, can be made only by written addendum issued by the City. Proposers shall submit all questions in writing to the contact listed in the announcement or submitted on the PlanetBids Portal. Proposers may not contact any other staff members with questions. The requesting party is responsible for prompt delivery of any requests. When the City considers interpretations necessary, interpretations will be in the form of an addendum to the RFP documents, and when issued, will be sent as promptly as is practical to all parties recorded by the City as having received RFP documents. All such addenda shall become a part of the RFP document. It is the responsibility of each consultant to ensure the City has their correct business name, mailing address and e-mail address on file through the PlanetBids online portal. Any prospective consultants who obtained a set of RFP documents from the PlanetBids online portal are responsible for checking PlanetBids to verify if any subsequent Addendums were issued. • IRREGULARITIES. City reserves the right to waive non-material irregularities if such would be in the best interest of the City as determined by the City Manager. • NON-DISCRIMINATION. Consultant represents and warrants that it does not and will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, gender, color, national origin, sexual orientation, ancestry, marital status, physical condition, pregnancy or pregnancy-related condition, political affiliation or opinion, age or medical condition. • NON-EXCLUSIVE. Should the City make an award, the successful consultant will enter into a NON-EXCLUSIVE professional services agreement and the City reserves the right to enter into agreements with other firms. • OFFERS OF MORE THAN ONE PRICE. Consultants are NOT allowed to submit more than one cost proposal. • OWNERSHIP. All data, documents and other products used or developed during the RFP process become the property of the City upon submission. All documents Page 965 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 9 of 45 submitted in response to this RFP shall become the property of the City and a matter of public record pursuant to Government Code sections 6250 et seq. Proposals should not be marked as confidential or proprietary, and City may refuse to consider a proposal so marked. All information contained within the proposals will become a matter of public record. It is the responsibility of each bidder to clearly identify any and all information contained within its bid proposal that it considers to be confidential and/or proprietary. To the extent that the City agrees with that designation, such information will be held in confidence whenever possible. All other information will be considered public. • PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. Prior to awarding any work, the selected Consultant will be required to execute a professional services agreement (sample attached) with the City. Any proposed change to the agreement shall be identified in the response to the Request for Qualifications (RFP) and shall be subject to the sole approval of the City. The City requires the Consultant to obtain and maintain a policy of professional liability and other insurance as indicated in the agreement. • NO PUBLIC OPENING/PUBLIC RECORDS ACT. Proposals shall be opened and its contents secured by City staff to prevent disclosure during the evaluative process and the process of negotiating with competing consultants. Adequate precautions shall be taken to treat each consultant fairly and to insure that information gleaned from competing proposals is not disclosed to other Consultants. Prices and other information concerning the proposals shall not be disclosed until a recommendation for award is made to the awarding authority. • PUBLIC RECORD. All proposals submitted in response to this RFP will become the property of the City upon submittal and a matter of public record when the City selects a proposer for recommendation to the City Council for its consideration pursuant to applicable law. • REPRESENTATIONS. Consultant understands and acknowledges that the representations made in their submitted proposal are material and important, and will be relied on by the City in evaluation of the proposal. Consultant misrepresentation shall be treated as fraudulent concealment from the City of the facts relating to the proposal. • SEVERABILITY. If any provisions or portion of any provision, of this Request for Qualifications are held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, they shall be severed from the Request for Qualifications and the remaining provisions shall be valid and enforceable. • SUBCONTRACTOR INFORMATION. If the proposal includes the use of sub consultants, consultant must identify specific sub consultants and the specific requirements of this RFP for which each proposed sub consultant would perform services. All sub consultant for work services must follow all required provisions of the prime contract. Page 966 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 10 of 45 • VALIDITY. Proposal must be valid for a period of 90 days from the due date. • WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL. Consultants’ authorized representative may withdraw Proposals only by written request received by this RFP contact personal before the Proposal Submittal Deadline. • BUSINESS LICENSE. The selected firm(s) must obtain a City of Hermosa Beach Business license and maintain a current certificate of insurance with the City for the duration of the Professional Service Agreement. Page 967 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 11 of 45 2. Project Overview 2.1 City Location and Characteristics The City of Hermosa Beach is located within the southwestern coastal portion of Los Angeles County in an area referred to locally as the “South Bay”. The City is bordered by the City of Manhattan Beach and City of Redondo Beach, and on the west by the Pacific Ocean. Hermosa Beach encompasses approximately 1.4 square miles, with almost 20,000 residents and a large number of visitors to its beaches and downtown. Governed by a five-member City Council with members elected at large, Hermosa Beach operates under the council/city manager form of government as a general law city. The programs and services provided by the City are accomplished through eight City departments: City Clerk, City Manager, Community Development, Community Resources, Finance, Human Resources, Police, and Public Works. 2.2 Objective and Goals The City of Hermosa Beach has secured grant funding from the Ocean Protection Council (OPC) Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) Grant Program to develop a Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan (SLRAP) and a Vulnerability Assessment (VA), in alignment with Ocean Protection Council (OPC) Sea Level Rise Adaptation Criteria. The funding will additionally help by allowing integration with relevant sections of the City’s development of an updated Local Coastal Plan (LCP), per Senate Bill 272. These grant funds are to be used to provide local assistance for implementation of Chapter 236 of the Statutes of 2021 (SB 1) for the purposes of supporting local and regional governments, in accordance with the provisions contained in the Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) Grant Program Solicitation and Agreement. The project will produce a VA and SLRAP for the City of Hermosa Beach. Together, these documents will identify current and future coastal flooding risks, evaluate exposure and vulnerabilities, and define practical strategies to reduce SLR impacts and improve long-term coastal resilience. The VA and SLRAP will provide the City with the technical basis and community- informed priorities needed to guide future adaptation actions and the update of its LCP. The process will also strengthen the City’s alignment with the broader Los Angeles County Regional Coastal Strategic Adaptation Plan (RCSAP) Page 968 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 12 of 45 2.3 Relevant Plans, Policies, Programs, or Projects Proposers should review and consider the work already completed or underway in the development of approach, budget, and schedule. The following documents are provided as Exhibits for your convenience: • Exhibit 1 – OPC-Approved Work Plan • Exhibit 2 - PLAN Hermosa, the City’s Comprehensive General Plan and Local Coastal Program, adopted 2017 • Exhibit 3 – 2016 LA County VA • Exhibit 4 – Hermosa Beach Local Coastal Plan 1981 • Exhibit 5 – Hermosa Beach Hazard Mitigation Plan 2025 • Exhibit 6 – Hermosa Beach Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency Measures Final Report 2022 3. Scope of Services The scope of work will match the OPC-approved work plan and schedule included with the Grant Agreement (Exhibit 1). Minor variations are allowed but must adhere to the minimum requirements of the approved plan and the general spirit and goals of the project, as also described above and in the Grant Agreement. The successful proposer shall assume that all tasks and deliverables are to be accomplished by the proposer except where City staff are explicitly required to be involved to provide information or support. Essentially, City staff will provide minimal guidance and support with the proposer leading the execution of the Work Plan and providing deliverables in a timely manner, as detailed in the Work Plan. 4. Proposal Submittal Instructions 4.1 Proposal Format Proposers shall submit one copy of the proposal and one copy of the fee schedule in PDF format on the PlanetBids Portal. Page 969 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 13 of 45 4.2 Proposal Content Proposals must be concise, but with sufficient detail to allow accurate evaluation and comparative analysis. Proposals should be straightforward and provide "layman" explanations of technical terms that are used. Emphasis should be concentrated on conforming to the RFP instructions, responding to the RFP requirements, and on providing a complete and clear description of the offer. Adherence to the approved Work Plan is essential. Proposals should include the sections as described in greater detail below. Do NOT include marketing brochures or other promotional material not connected with this RFP. 4.2.1 Cover Letter Proposal must be accompanied by a cover letter, signed by an individual authorized to bind the proposing entity. An unsigned proposal is grounds for rejection. The cover letter should include an introduction of the firm, contact information, summary statement of professional qualifications, and statement of understanding of the scope of work. The cover letter also shall acknowledge receipt of any addendums that were issued for this RFP. 4.2.2 Firm Profile Proposers should provide a brief profile of the prime consultant and any sub-consultants. Information should include, but is not limited to the following information: • Official name and address. • Name, address, email, and telephone number of the consultant’s primary point of contact. • Type of business entity of consultant (corporation, company, joint venture, etc.). Please enclose a copy of the Joint Venture Agreement if entity is a joint venture. • Federal Employer I.D. Number. • Address, telephone numbers and fax numbers of each of the proposing firm’s locations. • Indication whether firm is totally or partially owned by another business organization (parent company) or individual. • Number of years consultant has been in business under the present business name. • Number of years of experience the consultant has had in providing required, equivalent, or related services. Page 970 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 14 of 45 • Any failures or refusals to complete a contract, and explanation. 4.2.3 Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work Proposers should include in this section a statement of project understanding, organizational chart, approach to work program and summary of deliverables, described in greater detail below. Statement of Project Understanding Consultant must include in this section its understanding of the project and understanding of the Scope of Services noted herein. Consultant should be able to articulate a thorough understanding of the State, County and Local requirements, and other industry standards applicable to the project or services to be provided. Organizational Chart Consultant shall include an organizational chart that reflects key staff and roles/responsibilities of each individual assigned to provide services under this Proposal. Any roles or topics in which the proposer anticipates utilizing the expertise of subcontractors should be clearly identified. Approach to Work Program (Required and Optional Tasks) The City is seeking an effective, efficient and creative approach to preparing work products and meeting the City’s goals and timelines. In this section, proposers should include their recommended approach to providing the requested professional services and tasks noted in the Scope of Services in the RFP. The approach to the work plan shall be of such detail to demonstrate the proposer’s ability to accomplish project objectives. This section should also include proposed approaches and techniques to engagement of community and stakeholders in the process of developing projects. The proposer’s approach should provide detail on both the required and optional tasks identified in the scope of work, as well as any additional tasks or services performed by the proposer. Additional Services Consultant shall provide the City with any additional services that the firm can provide. Consultant may additionally itemize those services which are further beneficial but are not noted in the aforementioned paragraphs as requirements. Roles and Responsibilities for City Staff Proposer should summarize any services NOT provided by their firm that are listed in the Scope of Work. Consultant shall also list any resources, City assistance or other items expected to be provided by City, “Work to be Performed or Provided by the City”. Page 971 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 15 of 45 4.2.4 Project Management Plan Key to a creative, effective, and efficient delivery of projects is close coordination and communication between the City, community, and the selected consultant. In this section, proposers should provide information on scheduling, and describe the firm or project manager’s approach to communications and quality assurance/quality control. Project Schedule Proposers must provide a project schedule with anticipated timeframe for key deliverables outlined in the scope of work. Communications Approach Proposers should describe their recommended or preferred approach to project communications between the City and Consultant Team. This should include detail on the frequency of project check-ins, progress updates, and meeting locations (i.e. phone, email, in-person). Communications protocols for coordinating with other City departments, agencies, and the community can be established during individual project kick-offs. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Approach Describe the firm’s QA/QC processes that will be adhered to during the term of the agreement. Describe the Consultant’s method of ensuring that the assigned personnel’s quality of work is high. 4.2.5 Experience and Qualifications Proposers should include in this section a summary of relevant projects, contact information for references, and information about the experience, qualifications, and availability of key personnel, described in greater detail below. Summary of Relevant Projects Proposers should highlight representative projects that are similar in scope to the services requested to demonstrate the firm’s depth of experience and familiarity with similar projects. For each project, please include the following information, at a minimum: • Year started and completed (if relevant) • Contracting Agency + Department • Project Description • Key Personnel Assigned • Contract Value Page 972 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 16 of 45 References Consultant must provide at least three (3) references for which consultant has provided services similar in scope as set forth in the RFP within the last five (5) years. Reference information should include: • Name of agency • Name of agency project manager • Email address and telephone number of contact person • Description of project or services provided Experience and Qualifications of Key Personnel The consultant shall provide resumes indicating the experience and qualifications for the key personnel identified in the organization chart. Consultant shall also include the number and type of additional support personnel who will be providing services. At a minimum, the resume for each team member should include: • Name • Position and Role for This Project • Degrees and Certifications • Professional Memberships/Registrations • Summary of Experience • Work on Representative Project Similar in Scope If sub-consultants are to be used as part of this proposal, a resume of the sub-consultant and relevant experience is to be included in the same format. Assignment of Key Personnel It is the City’s preference to have the key personnel identified in the Organizational Chart remain with the individual project during its duration. In this section, please indicate the availability of key personnel to pursue completion of projects. After contract execution the Consultant should not substitute key personnel (project manager and others listed by name in the proposal) or sub-consultants without prior written approval from the local agency. The consultant must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from the agency prior to use of a different sub- consultant on the contract. The proposed substituted person must be as qualified as the original, and at the same or lower cost for similar types of consultant contracts, the Page 973 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 17 of 45 Consultant’s project manager shall have all the necessary credentials to qualify him/her as a project manager for this project. In the event there are proposed changes in key personnel, including sub-consultants, during the term of the agreement that are outside of the consulting firm’s control, the consultant shall prepare a transition plan that is presented to the City’s project manager for review. 4.2.6 Required Forms Consultant shall review, acknowledge and submit the following forms: • Certification of Proposal. Consultant is required to sign and submit the Certification of Proposal including acknowledgement that they have received and considered any addendums issued by the City of Hermosa Beach in connection with this RFP. (See section 7.2.1) • Non-Collusion Affidavit. Consultant is required to sign and submit the Non- Collusion Affidavit. (See section 7.2.2) • Compliance with Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall demonstrate the willingness and ability to submit proof of the required insurance coverage as set forth in the Sample Professional Services Agreement. (See section 7.2.3) • Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement. Consultant shall demonstrate willingness and ability to comply with the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement and/or indicate any exceptions to the Professional Services Agreement. (See section 7.2.4) 4.2.7 Cost Proposal The cost proposal shall be submitted through PlanetBids Portal as a separate file, labeled “Cost Proposal” and indicate the firm’s name. The cost proposal shall detail costs broken down by project phase, task, hourly rates, and key personnel. Consultant should provide the cost proposal for the duration of the agreement to successfully fulfill the Scope of Work detailed in this RFP. Required and optional tasks should be consistent with the tasks listed in the Scope of Services and be clearly marked in the cost proposal to facilitate consistent comparison of costs between proposals. The Cost Proposal should identify project team members, and hourly billing rates and break costs by task and phase. The fee schedule should also include any direct costs such as travel, equipment, printing/materials. The method of payment shall be primarily at Specified Rates of Compensation but may include Cost per Unit of Work. The proposal should include hourly rates for all types of personnel required to perform the services described in this RFP. Page 974 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 18 of 45 No mark ups will be allowed for direct or miscellaneous costs and sub-consultant work, however, an appropriate number of hours for sub-consultant oversight will be allowed. 5. Proposal Evaluation and Selection 5.1 Proposal Review Process The City will evaluate all proposals received in accordance with the evaluation criteria. The City shall not be obligated to accept the lowest priced fee schedule, but the City may make award(s) in the best interests of the City after all factors are considered, including, but not limited to, the demonstrated competence, experience and professional qualifications of the Proposer. Evaluation scores will not be released until after award of proposal, if one is made. Following the review of RFPs by the City’s team, the City may, if it chooses to do so, invite short-listed consultants to be interviewed by a panel of City staff, which may include non- city personnel at the City’s discretion. Discussions may, at the City's option, be conducted with the most qualified Proposers. Discussions may be for the purpose of clarification to assure full understanding of, and responsiveness to the solicitation requirements. Proposers shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and written revision of proposals. In conducting discussions, the City will not disclose information derived from proposals submitted by competing Proposers. The City will verify references of short-listed consultants, which may include persons not listed as references, and this will help inform the City’s decisions. The City will select a consultant to negotiate for the performance of work. In negotiating the contract the City may request modifications to the proposed scope or to the technical team or other elements of the proposal. If negotiations fail, the City will commence negotiations with the next qualified candidate. Work will promptly commence following contract award and satisfaction of contract requirements. 5.2 Evaluation Criteria Evaluation criteria will typically include RFP understanding, demonstrated expertise, relevant experience, availability of the firm’s team, and other factors. Task orders resulting from this contract will be negotiated and executed between the City and the selected firm. Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of their response to all provisions of this RFP. The City of Hermosa Beach will use the following criteria in its evaluation of proposals, interviews may be required with selected consultants, or verification of references. The categories will be weighted approximately as follows. Page 975 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 19 of 45 Approach and Methods (35%): • A well thought-out and tailored approach to the technical work that responds to the City’s particular issues and needs and adheres to the approved Work Plan. • Incorporation of innovative and/or creative approaches for providing the services that will maximize efficient, cost-effective operations or increased performance capabilities. • Evidence of the team’s ability to work collaboratively with other members of a multi-disciplinary team in a complex and dynamic working environment. • Demonstration of the team’s commitment to accurate and superior work products and services as detailed in the project management project management plan. Relevant Experience & Expertise (55%): • Recent experience preparing similar projects or providing similar services for jurisdictions. • Familiarity and experience with applicable industry standards and any relevant federal, state, or local requirements. • The depth and appropriateness of experience of individual members of the technical team as they relate to the specific technical tasks called for by the project. • The consultant team’s ability to dedicate a strong project manager that will serve as a single point of contact for the duration of the project. • The team’s experience and ability to clearly communicate technical concepts and terminology with the community and organizing and manages community outreach activities. Cost and Administration (20%): • Display of responsive timeframe to assigned tasks. • Evidence of the team’s ability to successfully deliver project tasks and deliverables within the identified project budget and minimize cost overruns • Billing rates, ability to comply with the timeline terms, and billing procedures. • The extent and nature of any proposed amendments to the City’s Professional Services Agreement. • Cost proposal is clearly defined, matches Work Plan, and aligns with City’s approved OPC funding for the project. Page 976 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 20 of 45 6. Contract Expectations 6.1 Contract Period The City anticipates the contract term would begin around April 2026. Per the approved Work Plan and Schedule, the City is interested in having the project completed before Fall 2028. 6.2 Professional Services Agreement The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City’s Professional Services Agreement. 6.3 Standards of Work In case of conflicts, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors, or omissions, Consultant shall submit the matter to City for clarification. Any work affected by such conflicts, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors or omissions which is performed by Consultant prior to clarification by City shall be at Consultant's risk and expense. 6.4 Invoicing and Payment Each invoice shall contain a progress report describing the work completed during the billing period and shall also include cost information by task regarding: previous work billed to date, work billed during the reporting period, percent of task completed and amount remaining by task. Invoices are to be submitted monthly. The invoices shall reference the project title, and list charges by task, worker classification, hours, billing rate, and totals. Each invoice shall contain a progress report describing the work completed during the billing period and conform to the invoicing and reporting requirements detailed in the Grant Agreement between the City and the OPC. Page 977 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 21 of 45 7. Attachments and Required Forms 7.1 Sample Professional Services Agreement PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND [________________] This professional services agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of [________] (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Hermosa Beach (a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254) (“City”) and [_________] (a [________] with its principal place of business at [________]) (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are hereinafter sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. RECITALS A. City is a public agency of the State of California and is in need of Consultant’s [_________] services (“Services”); and B. Consultant is duly licensed and has the necessary qualifications to provide such Services; and C. The Parties desire by this Agreement to establish the terms for City to retain Consultant to provide the Services described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: AGREEMENT 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. Page 978 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 22 of 45 2. Services. Consultant shall provide the City with the Services as set forth in in Exhibit A, Services, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of Exhibit A and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 3. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel identified in their proposal. Consultant warrants that Consultant is familiar with all laws that may affect its performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect Consultant’s performance of this Agreement. Consultant further represents that no City employee will provide any services under this Agreement. 4. Compensation a. Subject to paragraph 4b below, the City shall pay for the services listed in Exhibit A. b. In no event shall the total amount paid for services rendered by Consultant under this Agreement exceed the sum of [________] dollars ($[_______]). This amount is to cover all related costs for the duration of the term, and the City will not pay any additional fees for printing expenses. Consultant shall submit invoices to City no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the performance of work for which Consultant is billing, invoices shall detail the work performed on each milestone and each project as applicable. All invoices for City’s approved task(s) and or deliverable(s) shall include the following in order for payments to be processed: (1) Consultant’s name, (2) Contract number, (3) Task number, (4) Purchase order number, (5) Project name, (6) Invoice number, (7) Invoice date, (8) Billing period, (9) For work performed on a lump sum basis, the deliverables provided during the billing period or the percentage of each task completed during the billing period, Page 979 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 23 of 45 (10) For work performed on a time and materials basis, the name of the staff member working on the task and/or deliverable, the specific task or sub- task performed, the date of performance, the number of hours performed on that date, the staff member’s billing rate per Exhibit B, Cost Proposal, and the description of work performed for that time entry. Any charges for approved direct expenditures (e.g., mileage, parking, etc.) shall be accompanied by receipts or other documentation. (11) Total budgeted task amount, (12) Percentage of total task amount billed to date, and (13) Other information as required by a specific task. c. Said invoice shall be based on the total of all Consultant’s services which have been completed to City’s sole satisfaction. City shall pay Consultant’s invoice within forty-five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. The invoice shall describe in detail the services performed, the method of compensation subject to paragraph 4d below, and the associated time for completion. Any additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as “Additional Services” and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where applicable, on all invoices. d. Compensation for services under this Agreement shall be based on one of the following methods of compensation: (1) Lump Sum Method: whereby the Consultant is compensated for meeting designed project milestones for a specific Task. All of the Consultant’s costs, including employee salaries, overhead, other direct costs, subcontract expenses, and profit are included in the Lump Sum amount; (2) Time and Materials Method: whereby the Consultant is compensated based upon the agreed upon rates as stated in Exhibit B, Cost Proposal, and other approved direct costs, subject to Engineer’s approval, with a total not to exceed amount as stated in Exhibit B. Exhibit B shall be in effect for the duration of the Agreement; (3) Combination of Method 1 or 2 above: whereby the Consultant is compensated for some line items in their proposal based upon the Lump Sum Method and other line items in their proposal based on Time and Materials Method. 5. Additional or Removed Work. If changes in the work seem merited by the Parties and informal consultations with the other Party indicate that a change is Page 980 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 24 of 45 warranted, it shall be processed by the Consultant forwarding a letter to the City outlining the changes with a statement of estimated changes in fee and/or time schedule. An amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared by the City and executed by both Parties before performance of such services, or the City will not be required to pay for the changes in the scope of work. Such amendment shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of this Agreement. In the absence of an amendment, the City may order such changes and equitably adjust compensation as necessary. 6. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue until [________], unless the Agreement is previously terminated as provided for herein (“Term”). 7. Maintenance of Records; Audits a. Records of Consultant’s services relating to this Agreement shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be made available to City for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient times for a period of four (4) years from the Effective Date. b. Books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred shall be maintained by Consultant and made available at all reasonable times during the contract period and for four (4) years from the date of final payment under the contract for inspection by City. 8. Time of Performance. Consultant shall perform its services in a prompt and timely manner and shall commence performance upon receipt of written notice from the City to proceed. Consultant shall complete the services required hereunder within Term. 9. Delays in Performance a. Neither Party shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non-performing Party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include a Force Majeure Event. A Force Majeure Event shall mean an event that materially affects the Consultant’s performance and is one or more of the following: (1) Acts of God or other natural disasters occurring at the project site; (2) terrorism or other acts of a public enemy; (3) orders of governmental authorities (including, without limitation, unreasonable and unforeseeable delay in the issuance of permits or approvals by governmental authorities that are required for the services); and (4) pandemics, epidemics, or quarantine restrictions. “Orders of governmental authorities” includes ordinances; emergency proclamations and orders; and rules to protect the public health, welfare, and safety. b. Should a Force Majeure Event occur, the non-performing Party shall (within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing) give written notice to the Page 981 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 25 of 45 other Party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance. Delays shall not entitle Consultant to any additional compensation regardless of the Party responsible for the delay. 10. Compliance with Law a. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations of the Federal, state, and local government (including California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements). b. Consultant shall assist the City as requested in obtaining and maintaining all permits required of Consultant by Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies. c. If applicable, Consultant is responsible for all costs of clean up and / or removal of hazardous and toxic substances spilled as a result of his or her services or operations performed under this Agreement. 11. Standard of Care. Consultant’s services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles; and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. Consultant’s performance shall conform in all material respects to the requirements of the scope ofServices as described in Exhibit A. 12. Conflicts of Interest. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall at all times maintain a duty of loyalty and a fiduciary duty to the City; and shall not accept payment from or employment with any person or entity which will constitute a conflict of interest with the City. 13. Assignment and Subconsultant. Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the City (which may be withheld for any reason). Any attempt to so assign or so transfer without such consent shall be void and without legal effect and shall constitute grounds for termination. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall prevent Consultant from employing independent associates and subconsultants as Consultant may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder. 14. Independent Consultant. Consultant is retained as an independent contractor and is not an employee of City. No employee or agent of Consultant shall become an employee of City. The work to be performed shall be in accordance with the work described in this Agreement, subject to such directions and amendments from City as herein provided. Any personnel performing the work governed by this Agreement Page 982 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 26 of 45 on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such personnel (including but not limited to social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance). 15. Insurance. Consultant shall not commence work for the City until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. a. Additional Insured. The City (its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers) shall be named as additional insureds on Consultant’s and its subconsultants’ policies of commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance using the endorsements and forms specified herein or exact equivalents. b. Commercial General Liability (i) The Consultant shall take out and maintain (during the performance of all work under this Agreement, in amounts not less than specified herein) Commercial General (“CG”) Liability Insurance in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. (ii) Coverage for CG Liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 00 01) or exact equivalent. (iii) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for the following: (1) Bodily Injury and Property Damage (2) Personal Injury/Advertising Injury (3) Premises/Operations Liability (4) Products/Completed Operations Liability (5) Aggregate Limits that Apply per Project (6) Explosion, Collapse, and Underground (UCX) exclusion deleted (7) Contractual Liability with respect to this Agreement (8) Property Damage Page 983 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 27 of 45 (9) Independent Consultants Coverage (iv) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; (3) products/completed operations liability; or (4) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement. (v) The policy shall give City (its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and City-designated volunteers) additional insured status using ISO endorsement forms CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (vi) The general liability program may utilize either deductibles or provide coverage excess of a self-insured retention, subject to written approval by the City; and provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured. c. Automobile Liability (i) At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain Automobile Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage (including coverage for owned, non-owned, and hired vehicles in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City). (ii) Coverage for automobile liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 00 01 covering automobile liability (Coverage Symbol 1, any auto). (iii) The policy shall give City (its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and City-designated volunteers) additional insured status. (iv) Subject to written approval by the City, the automobile liability program may utilize deductibles; provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured, but not a self-insured retention. d. Workers’ Compensation/Employer’s Liability (i) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code; and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. (ii) To the extent Consultant has employees at any time during the term of this Agreement (at all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement), the Consultant shall maintain full compensation insurance for all persons Page 984 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 28 of 45 employed directly by him/her to carry out the work contemplated under this Agreement (all in accordance with the “Workers’ Compensation and Insurance Act”, Division IV of the Labor Code of the State of California and any acts amendatory thereof, and Employer’s Liability Coverage in amounts indicated herein). Consultant shall require all subconsultants to obtain and maintain (for the period required by this Agreement) workers’ compensation coverage of the same type and limits as specified in this section. e. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions). At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain professional liability or Errors and Omissions insurance appropriate to its profession in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City and in an amount indicated herein. This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors, or omissions of the Consultant. “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. f. Privacy/Network Security (Cyber). At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain privacy/network security insurance for: (1) privacy breaches; (2) system breaches; (3) denial or loss of service; and (4) the introduction, implantation, or spread of malicious software code in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. g. Minimum Policy Limits Required (i) The following insurance limits are required: Combined Single Limit Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 per occurrence/$4,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence Professional Liability $1,000,000 per claim and aggregate (errors and omissions) Cyber Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence and aggregate Page 985 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 29 of 45 (ii) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits. (iii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement; or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Any available coverage shall be provided to the Parties required to be named as Additional Insured pursuant to this Agreement. h. Evidence Required. Prior to execution of the Agreement, the Consultant shall file with the City evidence of insurance from an insurer or insurers certifying to the coverage of all insurance required herein. Such evidence shall include original copies of the ISO CG 00 01 (or insurer’s equivalent) signed by the insurer’s representative and Certificate of Insurance (Acord Form 25-S or equivalent), together with required endorsements. All evidence of insurance shall be signed by a properly authorized officer, agent, or qualified representative of the insurer and shall certify the names of the insured, any additional insureds (where appropriate) the type and amount of the insurance, the location and operations to which the insurance applies, and the expiration date of such insurance. i. Policy Provisions Required (i) Consultant shall provide the City at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement; except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of the premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the City at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (ii) The Commercial General Liability Policy and Automobile Policy shall each contain a provision stating that Consultant’s policy is primary insurance and that any insurance, self-insurance, or other coverage maintained by the City or any named insureds shall not be called upon to contribute to any loss. (iii) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three (3) years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period (a) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; (b) if the policy is cancelled or not Page 986 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 30 of 45 renewed; or (c) if the policy is replaced by another claims-made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. (iv) All required insurance coverages (except for the professional liability coverage) shall contain or be endorsed to provide waiver of subrogation in favor of the City (its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers) or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City; and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants. (v) The limits set forth herein shall apply separately to each insured against whom claims are made or suits are brought, except with respect to the limits of liability. Further the limits set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification obligations to the City and shall not preclude the City from taking such other actions available to the City under other provisions of the Agreement or law. j. Qualifying Insurers. All policies required shall be issued by acceptable insurance companies (as determined by the City) which satisfy the following minimum requirements: Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and admitted to transact in the business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any Federal law. k. Additional Insurance Provisions (i) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant; and any approval of said insurance by the City is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement (including but not limited to the provisions concerning indemnification). (ii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, the City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement. Page 987 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 31 of 45 (iii) The City may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (iv) The City (City Council, any member of the City Council, officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers) shall not be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. l. Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the City that they have secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the City as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, the City may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 16. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel reasonably approved by the City), indemnify, and hold the City (its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and authorized volunteers) free and harmless from any and all claims (demands, causes of action, suits, actions, proceedings, costs, expenses, liability, judgments, awards, decrees, settlements, loss, damage or injury of any kind in law or equity to property or persons including wrongful death (“Claims”)) in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts (errors, omissions, or willful misconduct) of Consultant (its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents) in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s services, the Project, or this Agreement (including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees, attorneys’ fees, and other related costs and expenses). This indemnification clause excludes Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City (the City Council, members of the City Council, its employees, or authorized volunteers). Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. 17. California Labor Code Requirements a. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq. (as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq.) ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws if applicable. Page 988 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 32 of 45 Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City (its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents) free and harmless from any claims (liabilities, costs, penalties, or interest) arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and all subcontractors to comply with all California Labor Code provisions which include but are not limited to prevailing wages (Labor Code Sections 1771, 1774 and 1775), employment of apprentices (Labor Code Section 1777.5), certified payroll records (Labor Code Sections 1771.4 and 1776), hours of labor (Labor Code Sections 1813 and 1815), and debarment of contractors and subcontractors (Labor Code Section 1777.1). The requirement to submit certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Section 1771.4. b. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants performing such Services must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants, as applicable. This Project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1. 18. Verification of Employment Eligibility. By executing this Agreement, Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and Federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens (including but not limited to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as may be amended from time to time), and shall require all subconsultants and sub- subconsultants to comply with the same. 19. Laws and Venue. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or Federal court situated in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. 20. Termination or Abandonment a. The City has the right to terminate or abandon any portion or all of the work under this Agreement by giving ten (10) calendar days’ written notice to Consultant. In such event, City shall be immediately given title and possession to all original field notes, drawings and specifications, written reports, and other documents Page 989 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 33 of 45 produced or developed for that portion of the work completed and/or being abandoned. The City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered for any portion of the work completed prior to termination. If said termination occurs prior to completion of any task for the Project for which a payment request has not been received, the charge for services performed during such task shall be the reasonable value of such services (based on an amount mutually agreed to by the Parties of the portion of such task completed but not paid prior to said termination). The City shall not be liable for any costs other than the charges or portions thereof which are specified herein. Consultant shall not be entitled to payment for unperformed services, and shall not be entitled to damages or compensation for termination of work. b. Consultant may terminate its obligation to provide further services under this Agreement upon thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice to City only in the event of substantial failure by City to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of Consultant. c. If the Agreement is terminated prior to its completion for any reason, Consultant shall refund the monthly prorated cost of the incomplete term. 21. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Consultant (when requested) shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City’s representative, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to Consultant’s professional services occurs, Consultant shall (at no cost to City) provide all other services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of the City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. 22. Prohibited Employment. Consultant shall not employ any current employee of City to perform the work under this Agreement while this Agreement is in effect. 23. Costs. Each Party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement; and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as expressly provided herein. 24. Ownership of Documents and Confidential Information a. All deliverables and other documents generated by Consultant in the performance of the Services (including all work papers, work-in-progress, designs, drawings, documents, data, computations, specifications, studies and reports prepared by Consultant as a part of the Services or authorized Additional Services (“Consultant Work Product”)) shall belong to and be subject to the sole ownership and use of City. b. Consultant may receive written or verbal information from City (its representatives or agents) not in the public domain during the course of the performance Page 990 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 34 of 45 of this Agreement. Such information may include City’s know how, trade secrets, and other proprietary and confidential information; and Consultant agrees to treat such information as confidential information belonging to City. Consultant agrees that neither it (nor its officers, employees, representatives, agents, successors, or assigns) will disclose such information to any third party or use the same in any manner without the prior written consent of City. Consultant further agrees to safeguard such proprietary and confidential information from unauthorized disclosure and/or use using the same degree of care it uses to protect its own proprietary and confidential information, but not less than a reasonable standard of care. In the event that disclosure of such information is sought pursuant to any law or regulation, Consultant shall promptly notify City of such fact to allow City to assert whatever exclusions or exemptions may be available to it under applicable law or regulation. 25. Organization. Consultant shall assign [______] as Project Manager. Consultant shall provide City fifteen (15) days written notice before removing or reassigning the Project Manager from the performance of the Services. 26. Limitation of Agreement. This Agreement is limited to and includes only the work included in the scope of Services described in Exhibit A. 27. Notice. Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered by this Agreement may be given or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office (certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and addressed to the following addresses) and shall be effective upon receipt thereof: CITY: City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Attn: [______] CONSULTANT: [Name] [Address] [Address] Attn: [_______] 28. Third Party Rights. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the City and the Consultant. 29. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or Page 991 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 35 of 45 applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non- discrimination shall include but not be limited to all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination. 30. City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves its right to employ other consultants, including engineers, in connection with the scope of Services as listed in Exhibit A or other scopes of Services. 31. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors in interest, executors, administrators, and assigns of each Party to this Agreement. However, Consultant shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties, or obligations without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment without such consent shall be invalid and void. 32. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has neither employed nor retained any company or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant) to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant) any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. No official, officer, or employee of City (during the term of his or her service with City) shall have any direct interest in this Agreement; or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom for the term of this Agreement. 33. Non-Waiver. The delay or failure of either Party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other Party of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the Party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy with respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy with respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. 34. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable for any reason, such determination shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the offending provision in any other circumstance; and the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Page 992 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 36 of 45 35. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 36. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain, or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof; and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 37. Amendments. Only a writing executed by all of the Parties hereto or their respective successors and assigns may amend this Agreement. 38. Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said Parties; and that by doing so, the Parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. 39. Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including the Exhibits) represents the entire understanding of the Parties as to those matters contained herein; and supersedes and cancels any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understanding, promises, or representations with respect to those matters covered hereunder. Each Party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by any person which are not incorporated herein, and that any other agreements shall be void. This is an integrated Agreement. 40. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one single Agreement. 41. Electronic Signature. Each Party acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement may be executed by electronic or digital signature, which shall be considered as an original signature for all purposes and shall have the same force and effect as an original signature. 42. Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to the City that certain additional key personnel and consultants will perform the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel or consultants become unavailable, Consultant may substitute others of at least equal competence upon written approval of the City. In the event the Parties cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, engineers, or consultants, the City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. Any personnel, engineers, or consultants who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City (or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Services, or a threat to the safety of persons or property) shall be promptly removed from the Services by the Consultant at the request of the City. The key additional personnel, engineers, and Page 993 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 37 of 45 consultants for performance of this Agreement are as follows: [INSERT NAMES, AND TITLES OF KEY PERSONNEL, AND LICENSE NUMBERS, IF APPLICABLE]. 43. Licenses and Permits. Consultant shall obtain all licenses and permits necessary for the performance of the Services at no cost to the City, except with respect to the following licenses and permits if so identified which the City shall obtain at its own cost: None. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] Page 994 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 38 of 45 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND [___________] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVED BY: Steve Napolitano City Manager ATTESTED BY: Reanna Guzman Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jason Baltimore Interim City Attorney [___________] Taxpayer Identified Number: Page 995 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 39 of 45 EXHIBIT A SERVICES Page 996 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 40 of 45 EXHIBIT B COST PROPOSAL Page 997 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 41 of 45 7.2 Required Forms 7.2.1 Certification of Proposal RFP #: _________ The undersigned hereby submits its proposal and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal (RFP). 1. Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Proposal, Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. 2. By submitting the response to this request, Proposer agrees, if selected to furnish services to the City in accordance with this RFP. 3. Proposer has carefully reviewed its proposal and understands and agrees that the City is not responsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the Proposer and that the Proposer is responsible for them. 4. It is understood and agreed that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals and to waive any informality or irregularity in any proposal received by the City. 5. The proposal response includes all of the commentary, figures and data required by the Request for Proposal 6. The proposal shall be valid for 90 days from the date of submittal. 7. Proposer acknowledges that the City may issue addendums related to this RFP and that the proposer has reviewed the following addendums which have been issued: Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ 8. Proposer further acknowledges the provisions of any addendums issued have been incorporated into their proposal. Page 998 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 42 of 45 Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page 999 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 43 of 45 7.2.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit RFP #: _________ The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1. This proposal is not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation. 2. This proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham. 3. I have not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Proposer to put in a false or sham proposal and I have not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any other Proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal or to refrain from submitting to this RFP. 4. I have not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price or to fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the proposal price or to secure any advantage against the City of Hermosa Beach or of anyone interested in the proposed contract. 5. All statements contained in the Proposal and related documents are true. 6. I have not directly or indirectly submitted the proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any person, corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, RFP depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. 7. I have not entered into any arrangement or agreement with any City of Hermosa Beach public officer in connection with this proposal. 8. I understand collusive bidding is a violation of State and Federal law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page 1000 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 44 of 45 7.2.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements RFP #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with the City s insurance requirements contained within this RFP. The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1. Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the insurance requirements as specified in the Request for Proposal. 2. If selected, proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page 1001 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Page 45 of 45 7.2.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement RFP #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City s Professional Services Agreement. Proposers should identify and/or indicate any exceptions to the Sample Professional Services Agreement included in Section 6.2. The City Attorney or their designee retains the discretion to accept or reject proposed exceptions or modifications to the City s Professional Services Agreement. 1. Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the conditions specified in the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement. 2. Proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein with exceptions noted as follows: ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page 1002 of 1339 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 .\ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND MOFFAT & NICHOL This professional services agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of May 27, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Hermosa Beach (a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254) (“City”) and Moffat & Nichol (a Corporation with its principal place of business at 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 400, Costa Mesa, California 92626) (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are hereinafter sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. RECITALS A. City is a public agency of the State of California and is in need of Consultant’s Coastal Adaptation Planning services (“Services”); and B. Consultant is duly licensed and has the necessary qualifications to provide such Services; and C. The Parties desire by this Agreement to establish the terms for City to retain Consultant to provide the Services described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: AGREEMENT 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Services. Consultant shall provide the City with the Services as set forth in Consultant’s “Proposal for Vulnerability Assessment and Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan” dated March 2026 (attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference). In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of Exhibit A and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 3. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel identified in their proposal. Consultant warrants that Consultant is familiar with all laws that may affect its performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect Consultant’s performance of this Agreement. Consultant further represents that no City employee will provide any services under this Agreement. Page 1003 of 1339 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 .\ 4. Compensation a. Subject to paragraph 4b below, the City shall pay for the services listed in Exhibit A. b. In no event shall the total amount paid for services rendered by Consultant under this Agreement exceed the sum of four hundred seventy- three thousand eight hundred seventy-five dollars ($473,875). This amount is to cover all related costs for the duration of the term, and the City will not pay any additional fees for printing expenses. Consultant may submit invoices to City for approval. Said invoice shall be based on the total of all Consultant’s services which have been completed to City’s sole satisfaction. City shall pay Consultant’s invoice within forty-five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. The invoice shall describe in detail the services performed and the associated time for completion. Any additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as “Additional Services” and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where applicable, on all invoices. 5. Additional Work. If changes in the work seem merited by the Parties and informal consultations with the other Party indicate that a change is warranted, it shall be processed by the Consultant forwarding a letter to the City outlining the changes with a statement of estimated changes in fee or time schedule. An amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared by the City and executed by both Parties before performance of such services, or the City will not be required to pay for the changes in the scope of work. Such amendment shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of this Agreement. 6. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue until April 30, 2029, unless the Agreement is previously terminated as provided for herein (“Term”). 7. Maintenance of Records; Audits a. Records of Consultant’s services relating to this Agreement shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be made available to City for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient times for a period of four (4) years from the Effective Date. b. Books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred shall be maintained by Consultant and made available at all reasonable times during the contract period and for four (4) years from the date of final payment under the contract for inspection by City. Page 1004 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 3 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 8. Time of Performance. Consultant shall perform its services in a prompt and timely manner and shall commence performance upon receipt of written notice from the City to proceed. Consultant shall complete the services required hereunder within Term. 9. Delays in Performance a. Neither Party shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non-performing Party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include a Force Majeure Event. A Force Majeure Event shall mean an event that materially affects the Consultant’s performance and is one or more of the following: (1) Acts of God or other natural disasters occurring at the project site; (2) terrorism or other acts of a public enemy; (3) orders of governmental authorities (including, without limitation, unreasonable and unforeseeable delay in the issuance of permits or approvals by governmental authorities that are required for the services); and (4) pandemics, epidemics, or quarantine restrictions. “Orders of governmental authorities” includes ordinances; emergency proclamations and orders; and rules to protect the public health, welfare, and safety. b. Should a Force Majeure Event occur, the non-performing Party shall (within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing) give written notice to the other Party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance. Delays shall not entitle Consultant to any additional compensation regardless of the Party responsible for the delay. 10. Compliance with Law a. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations of the Federal, state, and local government (including California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements). b. Consultant shall assist the City as requested in obtaining and maintaining all permits required of Consultant by Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies. c. If applicable, Consultant is responsible for all costs of clean up and / or removal of hazardous and toxic substances spilled as a result of his or her services or operations performed under this Agreement. Page 1005 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 4 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 11. Standard of Care. Consultant’s services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles; and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. Consultant’s performance shall conform in all material respects to the requirements of the Scope of Services. 12. Conflicts of Interest. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall at all times maintain a duty of loyalty and a fiduciary duty to the City; and shall not accept payment from or employment with any person or entity which will constitute a conflict of interest with the City. 13. Assignment and Subconsultant. Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the City (which may be withheld for any reason). Any attempt to so assign or so transfer without such consent shall be void and without legal effect and shall constitute grounds for termination. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall prevent Consultant from employing independent associates and subconsultants as Consultant may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder. 14. Independent Consultant. Consultant is retained as an independent contractor and is not an employee of City. No employee or agent of Consultant shall become an employee of City. The work to be performed shall be in accordance with the work described in this Agreement, subject to such directions and amendments from City as herein provided. Any personnel performing the work governed by this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such personnel (including but not limited to social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance). 15. Insurance. Consultant shall not commence work for the City until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. a. Additional Insured. The City (its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers) shall be named as additional insureds on Consultant’s Page 1006 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 5 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT and its subconsultants’ policies of commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance using the endorsements and forms specified herein or exact equivalents. b. Commercial General Liability (i) The Consultant shall take out and maintain (during the performance of all work under this Agreement, in amounts not less than specified herein) Commercial General (“CG”) Liability Insurance in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. (ii) Coverage for CG Liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 00 01) or exact equivalent. (iii) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for the following: (1) Bodily Injury and Property Damage (2) Personal Injury/Advertising Injury (3) Premises/Operations Liability (4) Products/Completed Operations Liability (5) Aggregate Limits that Apply per Project (6) Explosion, Collapse, and Underground (UCX) exclusion deleted (7) Contractual Liability with respect to this Agreement (8) Property Damage (9) Independent Consultants Coverage (iv) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; (3) products/completed operations liability; or (4) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement. (v) The policy shall give City (its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and City-designated volunteers) additional insured status using ISO endorsement forms CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (vi) The general liability program may utilize either deductibles or provide coverage excess of a self-insured retention, subject to written approval by the City; and provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured. Page 1007 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 6 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT c. Automobile Liability (i) At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain Automobile Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage (including coverage for owned, non-owned, and hired vehicles in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City). (ii) Coverage for automobile liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 00 01 covering automobile liability (Coverage Symbol 1, any auto). (iii) The policy shall give City (its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and City-designated volunteers) additional insured status. (iv) Subject to written approval by the City, the automobile liability program may utilize deductibles; provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured, but not a self-insured retention. d. Workers’ Compensation/Employer’s Liability (i) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code; and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. (ii) To the extent Consultant has employees at any time during the term of this Agreement (at all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement), the Consultant shall maintain full compensation insurance for all persons employed directly by him/her to carry out the work contemplated under this Agreement (all in accordance with the “Workers’ Compensation and Insurance Act”, Division IV of the Labor Code of the State of California and any acts amendatory thereof, and Employer’s Liability Coverage in amounts indicated herein). Consultant shall require all subconsultants to obtain and maintain (for the period required by this Agreement) workers’ compensation coverage of the same type and limits as specified in this section. e. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions). At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain professional liability or Errors and Omissions insurance appropriate to its profession in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City and in an amount indicated herein. This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability Page 1008 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 7 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors, or omissions of the Consultant. “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. f. Privacy/Network Security (Cyber). At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain privacy/network security insurance for: (1) privacy breaches; (2) system breaches; (3) denial or loss of service; and (4) the introduction, implantation, or spread of malicious software code in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. g. Minimum Policy Limits Required (i) The following insurance limits are required: Combined Single Limit Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 per occurrence/$4,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence Professional Liability $1,000,000 per claim and aggregate (errors and omissions) Cyber Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence and aggregate (ii) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits. (iii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement; or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Any available coverage shall be provided to the Parties required to be named as Additional Insured pursuant to this Agreement. Page 1009 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 8 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT h. Evidence Required. Prior to execution of the Agreement, the Consultant shall file with the City evidence of insurance from an insurer or insurers certifying to the coverage of all insurance required herein. Such evidence shall include original copies of the ISO CG 00 01 (or insurer’s equivalent) signed by the insurer’s representative and Certificate of Insurance (Acord Form 25-S or equivalent), together with required endorsements. All evidence of insurance shall be signed by a properly authorized officer, agent, or qualified representative of the insurer and shall certify the names of the insured, any additional insureds (where appropriate) the type and amount of the insurance, the location and operations to which the insurance applies, and the expiration date of such insurance. i. Policy Provisions Required (i) Consultant shall provide the City at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement; except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of the premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the City at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (ii) The Commercial General Liability Policy and Automobile Policy shall each contain a provision stating that Consultant’s policy is primary insurance and that any insurance, self-insurance, or other coverage maintained by the City or any named insureds shall not be called upon to contribute to any loss. (iii) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three (3) years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period (a) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; (b) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or (c) if the policy is replaced by another claims-made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. (iv) All required insurance coverages (except for the professional liability coverage) shall contain or be endorsed to provide waiver of subrogation in favor of the City (its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers) or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery Page 1010 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 9 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City; and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants. (v) The limits set forth herein shall apply separately to each insured against whom claims are made or suits are brought, except with respect to the limits of liability. Further the limits set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification obligations to the City and shall not preclude the City from taking such other actions available to the City under other provisions of the Agreement or law. j. Qualifying Insurers. All policies required shall be issued by acceptable insurance companies (as determined by the City) which satisfy the following minimum requirements: Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and admitted to transact in the business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any Federal law. k. Additional Insurance Provisions (i) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant; and any approval of said insurance by the City is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement (including but not limited to the provisions concerning indemnification). (ii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, the City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement. (iii) The City may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (iv) The City (City Council, any member of the City Council, officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers) shall not be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. Page 1011 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 10 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT l. Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the City that they have secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the City as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, the City may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 16. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel reasonably approved by the City), indemnify, and hold the City (its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and authorized volunteers) free and harmless from any and all claims (demands, causes of action, suits, actions, proceedings, costs, expenses, liability, judgments, awards, decrees, settlements, loss, damage or injury of any kind in law or equity to property or persons including wrongful death (“Claims”)) in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts (errors, omissions, or willful misconduct) of Consultant (its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents) in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s services, the Project, or this Agreement (including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees, attorneys’ fees, and other related costs and expenses). This indemnification clause excludes Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City (the City Council, members of the City Council, its employees, or authorized volunteers). Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. 17. California Labor Code Requirements a. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq. (as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq.) ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws if applicable. Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City (its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents) free and harmless from any claims (liabilities, costs, penalties, or interest) arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and all Page 1012 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 11 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT subcontractors to comply with all California Labor Code provisions which include but are not limited to prevailing wages (Labor Code Sections 1771, 1774 and 1775), employment of apprentices (Labor Code Section 1777.5), certified payroll records (Labor Code Sections 1771.4 and 1776), hours of labor (Labor Code Sections 1813 and 1815), and debarment of contractors and subcontractors (Labor Code Section 1777.1). The requirement to submit certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Section 1771.4. b. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants performing such Services must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants, as applicable. This Project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1. 18. Verification of Employment Eligibility. By executing this Agreement, Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and Federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens (including but not limited to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as may be amended from time to time), and shall require all subconsultants and sub- subconsultants to comply with the same. 19. Laws and Venue. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or Federal court situated in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. 20. Termination or Abandonment a. The City has the right to terminate or abandon any portion or all of the work under this Agreement by giving ten (10) calendar days’ written notice to Consultant. In such event, City shall be immediately given title and possession to all original field notes, drawings and specifications, written reports, and other documents produced or developed for that portion of the work Page 1013 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 12 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT completed and/or being abandoned. The City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered for any portion of the work completed prior to termination. If said termination occurs prior to completion of any task for the Project for which a payment request has not been received, the charge for services performed during such task shall be the reasonable value of such services (based on an amount mutually agreed to by the Parties of the portion of such task completed but not paid prior to said termination). The City shall not be liable for any costs other than the charges or portions thereof which are specified herein. Consultant shall not be entitled to payment for unperformed services, and shall not be entitled to damages or compensation for termination of work. b. Consultant may terminate its obligation to provide further services under this Agreement upon thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice to City only in the event of substantial failure by City to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of Consultant. c. If the Agreement is terminated prior to its completion for any reason, Consultant shall refund the monthly prorated cost of the incomplete term. 21. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Consultant (when requested) shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City’s representative, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to Consultant’s professional services occurs, Consultant shall (at no cost to City) provide all other services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of the City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. 22. Prohibited Employment. Consultant shall not employ any current employee of City to perform the work under this Agreement while this Agreement is in effect. 23. Costs. Each Party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement; and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as expressly provided herein. 24. Ownership of Documents and Confidential Information a. All deliverables and other documents generated by Consultant in the performance of the Services (including all work papers, work-in- progress, designs, drawings, documents, data, computations, specifications, studies and reports prepared by Consultant as a part of the Services or authorized Additional Services (“Consultant Work Product”)) shall belong to and be subject Page 1014 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 13 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT to the sole ownership and use of City. b. Consultant may receive written or verbal information from City (its representatives or agents) not in the public domain during the course of the performance of this Agreement. Such information may include City’s know how, trade secrets, and other proprietary and confidential information; and Consultant agrees to treat such information as confidential information belonging to City. Consultant agrees that neither it (nor its officers, employees, representatives, agents, successors, or assigns) will disclose such information to any third party or use the same in any manner without the prior written consent of City. Consultant further agrees to safeguard such proprietary and confidential information from unauthorized disclosure and/or use using the same degree of care it uses to protect its own proprietary and confidential information, but not less than a reasonable standard of care. In the event that disclosure of such information is sought pursuant to any law or regulation, Consultant shall promptly notify City of such fact to allow City to assert whatever exclusions or exemptions may be available to it under applicable law or regulation. 25. Organization. Consultant shall assign Chris Webb as Project Manager. Consultant shall provide City fifteen (15) days written notice before removing or reassigning the Project Manager from the Project. 26. Limitation of Agreement. This Agreement is limited to and includes only the work included in the Project described above. 27. Notice. Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered by this Agreement may be given or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office (certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and addressed to the following addresses) and shall be effective upon receipt thereof: CITY City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Attn: Douglas Krauss Email: dkrauss@hermosabeach.gov CONSULTANT Moffat & Nichol 555 Anton Blvd., Ste 400 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Attn: Chris Webb Email: cwebb@moffatnichol.com 28. Third Party Rights. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the City and the Consultant. Page 1015 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 14 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 29. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non-discrimination shall include but not be limited to all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination. 30. City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves its right to employ other consultants, including engineers, in connection with this Project or other projects. 31. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors in interest, executors, administrators, and assigns of each Party to this Agreement. However, Consultant shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties, or obligations without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment without such consent shall be invalid and void. 32. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has neither employed nor retained any company or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant) to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant) any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. No official, officer, or employee of City (during the term of his or her service with City) shall have any direct interest in this Agreement; or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom for the term of this Agreement. 33. Non-Waiver. The delay or failure of either Party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other Party of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the Party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy with respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy with respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. Page 1016 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 15 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 34. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable for any reason, such determination shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the offending provision in any other circumstance; and the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 35. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 36. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain, or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof; and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 37. Amendments. Only a writing executed by all of the Parties hereto or their respective successors and assigns may amend this Agreement. 38. Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said Parties; and that by doing so, the Parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. 39. Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including the Exhibits) represents the entire understanding of the Parties as to those matters contained herein; and supersedes and cancels any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understanding, promises, or representations with respect to those matters covered hereunder. Each Party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by any person which are not incorporated herein, and that any other agreements shall be void. This is an integrated Agreement. 40. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one single Agreement. 41. Electronic Signature. Each Party acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement may be executed by electronic or digital signature, which shall be considered as an original signature for all purposes and shall have the same force and effect as an original signature. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] Page 1017 of 1339 BBK (2026) Page 16 of 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND MOFFAT & NICHOL IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVED BY: Steve Napolitano City Manager ATTESTED BY: Martha Alvarez City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jason Baltimore Interim City Attorney MOFFAT & NICHOL Weixia Jin, PhD Vice President Page 1018 of 1339 Page 1019 of 1339 Page 1020 of 1339 Page 1021 of 1339 Page 1022 of 1339 Page 1023 of 1339 Page 1024 of 1339 Page 1025 of 1339 Page 1026 of 1339 Page 1027 of 1339 Page 1028 of 1339 Page 1029 of 1339 Page 1030 of 1339 Page 1031 of 1339 Page 1032 of 1339 Page 1033 of 1339 Page 1034 of 1339 Page 1035 of 1339 Page 1036 of 1339 Page 1037 of 1339 Page 1038 of 1339 Page 1039 of 1339 Page 1040 of 1339 Page 1041 of 1339 Page 1042 of 1339 Page 1043 of 1339 Page 1044 of 1339 Page 1045 of 1339 Page 1046 of 1339 Page 1047 of 1339 Page 1048 of 1339 Page 1049 of 1339 Page 1050 of 1339 Page 1051 of 1339 Page 1052 of 1339 Page 1053 of 1339 Page 1054 of 1339 Page 1055 of 1339 Page 1056 of 1339 Page 1057 of 1339 !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!! !!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!! ! ! !!!!!!!! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ^_^_^_ ù ù ù ù ù ù ù l l l Oceanside Carlsbad Oceanside Carlsbad GRAND AV JEFFERSON STFOREST AV LAGUNA DR HIGHLANDDRPRIVERDBUENA VISTA WY ARRONRDMTNVI EWDRTUTTLE STOCEAN STPIO PICO DRCHRISTIANSEN WY CYPRESSAV RATCLIFFRD N IKILY N N PLBEECH AV B U E N A V I STA CRPACIFIC AV I-5 RACARLSBAD BLKNOWLES AV ALLEYKREMEYERCRGARFIELD STWASHINGTON STP RIVATESTTESTBUENA PL VILLAGE PLANNING AREABuena Vista Lagoon Buena Vista Lagoon Carlsbad City Beach Hosp Grove Park Maxton Brown Park Magee Park 0 600 1,200300 Feet Inundation Hazard (2.0m) Bluff Hazard Zone (2.0m) Flood Hazard (2.0m) Multi-Family Residential One Family Residential Open Space Transportation Corridor Village Review l City Parks ù Beach Access Points ^_Sewer Pump Station !!!!!!Trails Stormdrains Roads Data Sources:• CoSMoS 3.0 (USGS, Feb 2016), City of Carlsbad, Moffatt & Nichol 05/12/16 Page 1058 of 1339 Page 1059 of 1339 Page 1060 of 1339 Page 1061 of 1339 Page 1062 of 1339 Page 1063 of 1339 Page 1064 of 1339 Page 1065 of 1339 Leslea Meyerhoff, M.A., AICP Ms. Meyerhoff is a certified coastal planner and CEQA practitioner with 20+ years of professional experience representing a wide variety of public agencies including special districts throughout California. Ms. Meyerhoff has managed the development of local coastal programs, primary infrastructure projects including shoreline protection and beach restoration projects, water projects, power stations, transmission facilities, roadway and transportation projects, solid waste facilities projects, lagoon restoration efforts, and master planned communities. Ms. Meyerhoff has extensive experience managing numerous complex coastal projects and bringing projects to successful completion. Leslea has spent the majority of her career as a coastal planning and environmental consultant and also served as a legislative aide for state and local officials on land use and environmental policy development. Ms. Meyerhoff places special emphasis on a commitment to consistently providing the highest level of client service and functioning as adjunct public agency staff. PROJECT EXPERIENCE San Clemente Local Coastal Program: Ms. Meyerhoff serves as the Contract Coastal Administrator responsible for managing the federal beach sand project placing 200,000 cubic yards of sand on City beaches. Ms. Meyerhoff is also assisting in the development of the LCP and managed the preparation of the Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment and Coastal Resiliency Plan. Current efforts include the reestablishment of a shoreline monitoring program, nature-based sand retention project feasibility study, offshore borrow site investigation and a Sand Compatibility and Opportunistic Use program (SCOUP) for sediment management, offshore sand search investigation and nature based adaptation strategy planning. Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors: Ms. Meyerhoff is the lead coastal planner collaborating with a multi-disciplinary team of coastal experts to improve long term coastal resiliency in Los Angeles County by developing plans and projects to restore sand supply and widen beaches in the region. Current projects include the development of a SCOUP program (sand compatibility and opportunistic use program), coastal project development at Malibu, Dockweiler and Redondo Beach and establishment of a Regional Coastal Strategic Adaptation Plan and coastal collaborative to promote long term regional resiliency in the greater LA County coastal zone. City of Solana Beach Local Coastal Program: Ms. Meyerhoff was the City’s Local Coastal Program manager responsible for preparing the City’s first Local Coastal Program (LCP) Land Use Plan (LUP) in compliance with the California Coastal Act. This effort involved significant collaboration with key stakeholders including property owners, City Staff, Coastal Commission Staff and NGO’s. Ms. Meyerhoff also managed the process to amend the LUP to incorporate fees studies for shoreline projects. Future work efforts involve the development of the LCP Local Implementation Plan (LIP) to reflect adopted and Certified LUP policies. City of Laguna Beach, Local Coastal Program: Ms. Meyerhoff served in an adjunct planning staff capacity to assist the City in updating their Local Coastal Program. The City has a certified LCP that is in the process of being comprehensively reviewed with targeted updates to address contemporary issues of critical importance to the City including beach, bluff and shoreline erosion, ESHA, parking, and public access components. City of Laguna Niguel Local Coastal Program: Ms. Meyerhoff assisted the City with a comprehensive update to the City’s two Certified Local Coastal Programs including the South Laguna LCP and the Aliso Creek LCP in compliance with the California Coastal Act. This effort involves significant collaboration with key stakeholders including property owners, City Staff, Coastal Commission Staff and NGO’s. The City’s two LCPs were approved by the County of Orange prior to the City of Laguna Niguel incorporation date. Our current efforts involve updating the documents to contemporary LCP standards and updating important key policies in line with current local practices. EDUCATION M.A. UCLA, Urban Planning, Environmental Analysis & Policy B.A. CSU Sacramento, Government and Environmental Studies CERTIFICATIONS / AFFILIATIONS / AWARDS California Shore and Beach Preservation Association, Board of Directors, 2025 Best Restored Beach, ASBPA, 2025, City of Solana Beach Project Manager American Planning Association, Orange County Chapter, Merit Award 2025 UCI 2025 School of Engineering Coastal Collaboration with City of San Clemente American Shore & Beach Preservation Association, Past Director Orange County Register, 2024 Top 125 Most Influential People California Coastal Coalition, Friend of the Coast Award UCLA Bruin Top 100 Small Business Owner 2023 American Institute of Certified Planners CERT Team 11, City of Carlsbad Page 1066 of 1339 ANDY PENDOLEY | PUBLIC OUTREACH Andy Pendoley, CEO and Founder, offers 25 years of experience as a facilitator, strategic planner, and public outreach specialist. Andy’s passion for designing and facilitating participatory processes and developing innovative and implementable plans for organizations and communities is grounded in guiding principles of inclusivity, creativity, and practicality. Andy has applied his experience in a wide range of multi-layered, complex community planning efforts including land use, urban design, parks and recreation, mobility, economic development, environmental health, health and human services, and more. Andy’s experience throughout Southern California includes work in urban, suburban, and rural community types, supporting many coastal communities and agencies, including but not limited to: City of San Diego, Port of San Diego, and the cities of Chula Vista and Imperial Beach. For the City of Hermosa Beach, Andy served as the lead for community outreach and facilitation in developing the Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency Measures to Address Coastal Flooding in his previous role with MIG, Inc. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE: Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency Measures to Address Coastal Flooding, City of Hermosa Beach. Director of Community Engagement. As part of MIG, Inc., designed and conducted community engagement activities that integrated with the technical planning process. Facilitated virtual advisory group and community meetings, and developed summary reports to document proceedings and outcomes. Regional Decarbonization Framework, Land Use and Environment Group, County of San Diego, Lead Facilitator. As part of employment under a different consulting firm, designed and facilitated stakeholder and community engagement across energy, transportation, building, and land use sectors. Supported development of messaging, information materials, and invitations to engage participants in the effort. Trained County staff in small group facilitation and note-taking techniques. Community Leadership Teams—Facilitation Training, Health and Human Services Agency, County of San Diego. Lead Trainer. Trained County staff and community residents in meeting facilitation skills and techniques, as well as communication strategies for managing difficult conversations. Expanded participants’ knowledge and confidence in facilitating productive community discussions EDUCATION M.A., Communication, San Diego State University B.A., Sociology— Organizational Studies, University of California, Davis AFFILIATIONS Andy served as a faculty member with the School of Public Affairs, San Diego State University, as Lecturer in the undergraduate Methods of Analysis in Planning course (2017-2024). His professional affiliations and memberships include the following: International Association for Public Participation American Planning Association Urban Land Institute Amplified Impact Partners Lambda Alpha International Page 1067 of 1339 Matthew James, M.S. | Adaptation Planning Matt has been working on restoration of wetlands and uplands in coastal southern California since 1993. In over 25 years in this field, Matt has been involved in virtually all aspects of restoration in a wide variety of settings. His early experience was in an academic setting, where he designed and conducted grant-funded research-based Adaptive Restoration projects at Tijuana Estuary, Sweetwater Marsh and throughout UCSB’s Natural Areas. Matt co-taught a restoration ecology class for several years at UCSB as well. In 2005, Matt partnered with David Hubbard and formed CRC, and since then has prepared over 20 restoration plans and helped coordinate the implementation of over 50 acres of grant-funded habitat restoration. Matt’s more recent focus has been on planning sustainable and resilient large-scale habitat restoration projects, designing and implementing Adaptive Restoration projects, and using nature-based solutions to increase the resilience of coastal communities and habitats as sea level rises and climate changes. Education: 1998 - M.S. in Biology - Ecology San Diego State University 1994 - B.S. in Biology University of California, Irvine Principal/Co-Owner, Coastal Restoration Consultants. 2005 – Present Some projects Matt has led or played a substantial role in: Santa Barbara Waterfront Resiliency Study. 2025 Present. (Client: City of Santa Barbara) Zuma Beach Dune Restoration. 2025 Present. (Client: LA County Beaches and Harbors) LA County Beaches Resilience Study. 2024 – 2025. (Client: LA County Beaches and Harbors) San Clemente Nature Based Solutions Feasibility Study. 2022 – Present. (Client: City of San Clemente) Carpinteria Dune and Shoreline Management Plan. 2020 – 2022. (Client: City of Carpinteria) Using Green Engineering to Restore Dunes at Border Field State Park. 2018 – 2023. (Client: Sea Grant and California State Parks) Surfers Point Managed Retreat and Dune Restoration, Phase II. 2019 – 2024. (Client: The City of San Buenaventura) Manhattan Beach Living Shoreline. 2019 – 2020. (Client: The Bay Foundation) Understanding Risk – Coastal Assessment of Eight Towns. 2019 – 2022. (Client: Jamaica Coastal Investment Fund) Other Work Experience: Senior Museum Scientist, Campus Lagoon Manager, UCSB Museum of Systematics and Ecology. 2002-2005 Research Associate, UCSB Marine Science Institute. 2004-2005 Lecturer, UCSB, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology. 2004-2005 Museum Scientist, UCSB Museum of Systematics and Ecology. 2001-2002 Research Associate, Pacific Estuarine Research Laboratory. 1998-1999 Graduate Research Assistant, Pacific Estuarine Research Laboratory. 1996-1998 Other Professional Activities: Society for Ecological Restoration – California (SERCAL) President 2012-13, Director, 2008-11 Program Chair – SERCAL Annual Conference in Santa Barbara, CA 2013 Served on the SCWRP Task Forces for Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties, 2001-2010 Served on research and restoration committees at Tijuana Estuary. 1997-1998 National Estuarine Research Reserve Fellow at Tijuana Estuary. 1997-1998 Matt is a certified wetland delineator and has advanced training in soil science Page 1068 of 1339 Page 1069 of 1339 Page 1070 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach 7.2 Required Forms 7.2.1 Certification of Proposal RFP #: _________ The undersigned hereby submits its proposal and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal (RFP). 1. Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Proposal, Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. 2. By submitting the response to this request, Proposer agrees, if selected to furnish services to the City in accordance with this RFP. 3. Proposer has carefully reviewed its proposal and understands and agrees that the City is not responsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the Proposer and that the Proposer is responsible for them. 4. It is understood and agreed that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals and to waive any informality or irregularity in any proposal received by the City. 5. The proposal response includes all of the commentary, figures and data required by the Request for Proposal 6. The proposal shall be valid for 90 days from the date of submittal. 7. Proposer acknowledges that the City may issue addendums related to this RFP and that the proposer has reviewed the following addendums which have been issued: Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ 8. Proposer further acknowledges the provisions of any addendums issued have been incorporated into their proposal. Page 1071 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page 42 of 45 Page 1072 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach 7.2.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit RFP #: _________ The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1. This proposal is not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation. 2. This proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham. 3. I have not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Proposer to put in a false or sham proposal and I have not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any other Proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal or to refrain from submitting to this RFP. 4. I have not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price or to fix any overhead,profitorcostelementoftheproposalpriceortosecureanyadvantage against the City of Hermosa Beach or of anyone interested in the proposed contract. 5. All statements contained in the Proposal and related documents are true. 6. I have not directly or indirectly submitted the proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any person, corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, RFP depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. 7. I have not entered into any arrangement or agreement with any City of Hermosa Beach public officer in connection with this proposal. 8. I understand collusive bidding is a violation of State and Federal law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page 1073 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach 7.2.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements RFP #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with the City s insurance requirements contained within this RFP. The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1. Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the insurance requirements as specified in the Request for Proposal. 2. If selected, proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page 44 of 45 Page 1074 of 1339 RFP 26-002 City of Hermosa Beach 7.2.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement RFP #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City s Professional Services Agreement. Proposers should identify and/or indicate any exceptions to the Sample Professional Services Agreement included in Section 6.2. The City Attorney or their designee retains the discretion to accept or reject proposed exceptions or modifications to the City s Professional Services Agreement. 1. Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the conditions specified in the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement. 2. Proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein with exceptions noted as follows: ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page 45 of 45 Page 1075 of 1339 Proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein with exceptions noted as follows: - Section 3 Professional Practices: Request to replace the term “warrants” with “represents” in the third line. - Section 12 Conflicts of Interest: Request to strike “maintain a duty of loyalty and a fiduciary duty to the City” and replace it with “refrain from taking any action or enter into any other contractual obligation which could create a conflict of interest under this Agreement;” - Section 15 Insurance, Sub Section e.: Request to amend the Professional Liability clause as follows: “At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain professional liability or Errors and Omissions insurance appropriate to its profession in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City and in an amount indicated herein. This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against negligent acts, errors, or omissions of the Consultant. “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend the policy holder.” - Section 15 Insurance, Sub Section g, line (ii).: Request to add “except for Professional Liability insurance” at the end of the sentence. - Section 16 Indemnification: Request to strike “in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged” and replace with “to the extent caused by the negligent”, and add “reasonable” before attorneys’ fees in line 11 of the paragraph. - Section 20 Termination or Abandonment: Strike “prior to” and replace with “up to and including the date of” in line 7 of the paragraph - Section 21 Responsibility of Errors: Request to strike “sole” and replace with “reasonable” in line 7 of the paragraph. - Section 24 Ownership of Documents and Confidential Information, Sub Section a.: Request to add “Consultant shall not be held liable for any modification or re-use by the City of delivered Work Product for purposes outside this Agreement (or outside the original intent of the Work Product). Consultant shall retain the right to use pre-existing materials or data which may have been included in the Consultant Work Product, on other projects.” at the end of the sub section. - Section 35 Time of Essence: Request to add “subject, however, to exercise of the standard of care in the performance of services.” at the end of the sentence. Page 1076 of 1339 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ADDENDUM No. 1 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PLAN (RFP 26-002) Complete and sign this acknowledgement form. Enclose the original copy of the acknowledgement in your bid. Failure to do so may result in disqualification of your firm’s bid. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of Addendum No. 1 dated March 16, 2026. ATTEST: _____________________________________ Principal: _____________________________________ Address: _____________________________________ By: _____________________________________ Title: _____________________________________ 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 | hermosabeach.gov |HermosaBchCityHermosaBeachCity Page 2 Page 1077 of 1339 Page 1078 of 1339 Page 1079 of 1339 Page 1080 of 1339 Page 1081 of 1339 Page 1082 of 1339 HERMOSA BEACH AWARD OF CONTRACT TO MOFFAT & NICHOL FOR PREPARATION OF A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PLAN Page 1083 of 1339 BACKGROUND •Senate Bill 1 (2021)directed State to provide funds to local governments to develop sea level rise (SLR)adaptation plans and implement projects •Senate Bill 272 (2023)requires local governments to develop SLR plans •Staff applied to the Ocean Protection Council and was awarded $583,307 in grant funds to accomplish this Page 1084 of 1339 BACKGROUND •Staff developed a Request for Proposals and advertised it on February 26,2026 with a submittal date of March 26 •Proposals were received from the following firms: -Blue Strike -Michael Baker -Moffat & Nichols -Somos Page 1085 of 1339 DISCUSSION •Proposals were evaluated by staff based on Approach and Methods (35%) Relevant Experience and Expertise (45%) Cost and Administration (20%) •Moffat and Nichols were chosen based on their familiarity with Hermosa Beach and experience with similar projects in the region Page 1086 of 1339 DISCUSSION •The proposed cost of $473,875 will be funded with the grant funds.The balance will go towards staff costs and other project costs •Consultant will begin work immediately with plan development estimated to take approximately 2-3 years •Work will involve analysis of conditions and historical data,stakeholder meetings,community outreach,and support of City’s Local Coastal Plan development Page 1087 of 1339 QUESTIONS Page 1088 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 8 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PW-025 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR C ALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PROJECT ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY YARD PROJECT (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Award a contract for City Yard CEQA and environmental services to Roux Associates, Inc. (Roux) at a not-to-exceed amount of $498,800 (Attachment 3); 2. Authorize the City Manager to establish a project contingency amount of $75,000 and to approve amendments to the agreement up to the amount of the approved project contingency; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement, approve minor modifications, if necessary, with the City Clerk attesting the agreement, subject to approval by the City Attorney. Executive Summary: The Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes CIP 615 New Corporate Yard Facilities to fully renovate the City Yard facility at 555 6 th Street. The existing facility is outdated and in poor condition with growing urgency for repair and renovation to ensure continued use and efficient delivery service. At its September 9, 2025, meeting, City Council directed staff to advance the necessary environmental assessments for the City Yard Project. Numerous environmental studies and tests have been completed at the City Yard property as part of prior projects to replace the City Yard, including, but not limited to a 2014 Final Environmental Impact Study (FEIR). However, many of the studies and regulatory approvals have expired and need to be updated to the current CEQA Guidelines, applicable local, state, coastal regulatory standards, and best practice for the City Yard Replacement Project. Updated environmental testing and assessments will also be necessary to further refine the cost estimate for the overall project including identification of abatement, remediation, and construction period monitoring requirements. Following a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP) process, staff recommends the City Council award a Professional Services Agreement to Roux Associates, Inc. at a not-to-exceed amount of $498,800 covering pre-construction services. Page 1089 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 8 Background: The Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes CIP 615 New Corporate Yard Facilities intended to fully renovate the City Yard facility at 555 6th Street. Currently, the City Yard consists of two maintenance buildings, an office trailer, several storage containers, a vehicle washout area, an animal control storage building, and a construction materials storage area. The existing facility is outdated and in poor condition with a growing urgency for repair and renovation to ensure continued use and efficient service delivery. During the 2023 and 2024 CIP Study Sessions, Council indicated a desire for staff to evaluate the potential for the project to proceed through an alternative delivery model (i.e., design-build versus the progressive design-bid-build method) with the goal of retaining a contractor-designer team through a qualifications-based selection, potential risk transfer, and reducing overall cost and schedule uncertainty. Staff presented a brief presentation comparing both options to City Council during the May 13, 2025, CIP Study Session meeting for initial consideration. At that meeting, Council directed staff to seek additional input from the Public Works Commission on the preferred project delivery method and then return to City Council. At its July 16, 2025, meeting, staff provided a presentation to the Public Works Commission (Commission) comparing the two proposed project delivery methods and the necessary steps to advance the project under either method, including the importance of retaining owner’s representative (OR) services. Commission passed a motion recommending the City Council consider proceeding with the design -bid-build (DBB) method for the City Yard Project, citing concerns about potential unknowns in the guaranteed maximum price (GMP) at time of contract award and process constraints for design development and review. In reviewing the concerns highlighted by the Public Works Commission, staff reevaluated the necessary steps to advance the project and determined that a decision on project delivery method was not yet required and there were other critical path items necessary to advance the project, under either method, including retaining the services of an experienced OR, advancing the project programming, updated environmental assessments, consideration of temporary relocation of existing operations off -site (e.g., storage facility site), and continued evaluation of financing options which will need to be in place before the project can continue. Staff presented the project delivery plan to City Council at its September 9, 2025, meeting, where City Council directed staff to advance with the issuance of the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for OR services for the City Yard as well as direction to proceed with the project programming and environmental assessments. Page 1090 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 8 At its January 13, 2026, meeting, City Council awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Cumming Management Group, Inc. (Cumming) for OR services. OR services are intended to include all phases of the project from pre -design through construction completion and closeout; however, the current scope of work covers only preconstruction services. Construction period services will be considered at a later date and subject to City Council approval at that time. In March 2026, staff, with support from the OR, selected one of the City’s on-call architectural firms (IDS Group) to provide architectural programming services. The selection followed review of proposals from the City’s on -call architects, two rounds of interviews, and fee negotiations. Staff held a project kick -off meeting with the programming architect on April 6, 2026, and the architect has begun deta iled site observations, land survey, and preliminary programming efforts. On May 5, 2026, the Park and Recreation and Public Works Commissions held a Joint Meeting to discuss the FY 26-27 CIP. The Commissions approved staff’s recommendation for the CIP that continues to prioritize the City Yard project among other high priority projects. Past Board, Commission, and Council Actions Meeting Date Description City Council: May 13, 2025 City Council made a motion directing staff to seek additional input from the Public Works Commission and City Council on the preferred project delivery method. Public Works Commission: July 16, 2025 Public Works Commission reviewed delivery options and made a motion recommending City Council to proceed with the traditional design-bid-build procurement method for the City Yard Project. City Council: September 9, 2025 City Council directed staff to proceed with issuing the Request for Qualifications for Owner’s Representative services for the City Yard Project; advance the environmental assessment; and commence project programming phases of the project. City Council: January 13, 2026 City Council awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Cumming Management Group, Inc. for Owner’s Representative services at not-to-exceed amount of $565,000, and a term of four years ending January 13, 2030. Joint Park and Public Works Commissions: May 5, 2026 The Commissions approved staff’s recommendations for the FY 26-27 CIP, which included giving priority to the City Yard project among other high priority projects. Page 1091 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 8 Discussion: Following the award of the Professional Services Agreement for OR staff worked closely with Cumming in preparation of the Request for Proposal (RFP) 26 -003 (Attachment 1) for environmental assessment services for the City Yard Project. On February 19, 2026, the RFP was advertised for a period of five weeks using online bidding platform, PlanetBids. Six proposals were received on Monday, March 16, 2026, and are listed below in alphabetical order: 1. Aspen Environmental Group 2. Chambers Group, Inc. 3. Eyestone Environmental 4. PlaceWorks 5. Roux Associates, Inc. 6. UltraSystem Environmental, Inc. The proposals were independently evaluated in detail by a staff review panel and scored based on the following weighted criteria:  Approach and Methods (40 percent) o Consultant provided a well thought-out and tailored approach to the technical work that responds to the City’s particular issues and needs. o Consultant incorporated innovate and/or creative approaches for providing the services that will maximize efficient, cost-effective operations or increased performance capabilities. o Consultant provided evidence of the team’s ability to work collaboratively with other members of a multi-disciplinary team in a complex and dynamic working environment. o Consultant demonstrated the team’s commitment to accurate and superior work products and services as detailed in the project management project management plan.  Relevant Experience & Expertise (40 percent) o Consultant demonstrated recent experience preparing similar projects or providing similar services for jurisdictions. o Consultant demonstrated familiarity and experience with applicable industry standards and any relevant federal, state, or local regulatory requirements. o Consultant demonstrated the depth and appropriateness of experience of individual members of the technical team as they relate to the specific technical tasks called for by the project. o Consultant dedicated a strong project manager that will serve as a single point of contact for the duration of the project o Consultant demonstrated the team’s experience and ability to clearly communicate technical concepts and terminology with the community. Page 1092 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 5 of 8  Administration (20 percent) o Display of responsive timeframe to assign tasks. o Evidence of the team’s ability to successfully deliver project tasks and deliverables within the identified project budget and minimized cost overruns. o Billing rates and ability to comply with billing requirements. o The extent and nature of any proposed amendments to the City’s Professional Services Agreement. The evaluation sought out firms with experience in providing California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) project analysis and other environmental assessment se rvices on similar projects for other public sector clients with a proven, responsible, and responsive contract manager to ensure timely execution of all work related to the City Yard project. Based on a comprehensive review, staff recommends awarding a co ntract for CEQA and other environmental services for the City Yard to the second ranked firm, Roux Associates, Inc. (Roux) (Attachment 2). Firms were ranked according to the weighted selection criteria described above. The rankings are as follows: Ranking Company 1 Aspen Environmental Group 2 Roux Associates, Inc. 3 PlaceWorks 4 UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. 5 Eyestone Environmental 6 Chambers Group, Inc. Following the scoring of technical proposals and in -person interviews with the top two ranked and shortlisted firms, Aspen Environmental Group (Aspen) and Roux, the City entered into negotiations with Aspen. Shortly after negotiations began, Aspen requeste d in writing to be withdrawn from consideration due to an inability to provide an accurate scope of work and appropriate fee for the project. The City engaged the second -ranked firm for the project, Roux. Roux exhibited the greatest understanding of the City’s needs and demonstrated the strongest ability to provide an experienced project manager, who is familiar and experienced with applicable industry standards and any relevant federal, state, or local regulatory requirements, and with experienced supporting staff as needed to advance the project. Roux also had strong professional references and has provided similar services for numerous public agencies including Orange County Public Works, Los Angeles Community College District, Los Angeles County Public Works, City of Burbank Department of Water and Power, City of Whittier, City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks, and other municipal, county, state, and federal entities. The designated project manager brings direct expertise with over 30 years of experience Page 1093 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 6 of 8 managing and preparing CEQA and NEPA documents for complex public infrastructure and development projects including the Helen Keller Park Remediation Project, Keller Yard Layover Facility Project, and the Laguna Beach Water Tank Ravine Burn Site Remediation which demonstrates the familiarity with hazardous materials cleanups sites, maintenance yar facility requirements, and projects in a coastal setting with high community expectations. Roux’s scope of work consists of comprehensive environmental testing and analysis; preparing high quality, legally defensible environmental documents in accordance with the current CEQA Guidelines, applicable local, state, and coastal regulatory standards, and best practices; project management, and public outreach. The environmental documents will include updated technical studies and documentation, as well as hazardous materials evaluation. The CEQA document is anticipated to be completed in four to six months. Depending on City Council’s direction following CEQA completion, Roux can continue the remaining contract term to perform the remedial planning, and site monitoring necessary to support demolition, construction, cleanup implementation and regulatory coordination; the scope of work and cost for those items will need to be evaluated at that time. If approved, Roux will commence the environmental assessment services and CEQA project analysis immediately upon contract execution with a not -to-exceed limit of $498,800 which covers only pre-construction services. If necessary, the City Manager will issue amendments to the agreement up to the amount of approved project contingency of $75,000 to account for unknowns that may be discovered in the filed or new studies or tests that may be required by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) over the remediation and reuse of the project site. Services would be performed on a time and materials basis with a not-to-exceed limit. The scope of their services is extensive and was developed from studies and reports performed onsite by previous consultants and mandated by the Corrective Action Plan from Los Angeles County Fire Department Site Mitigation Unit (2020). Roux’s tasks include: 1. Technical studies required for CEQA documentation 2. Draft and final CEQA documents 3. Public outreach 4. Project management 5. Hazardous materials studies updated for new regulation and screening levels 6. Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) updated to account for new regulations and screening levels since the previous HHRA was completed in 2018 7. Corrective Action Plan (CAP) updated to account for new regulations and screening levels since the previous CAP was completed in 2019 8. Health and Safety Plan (HASP) Page 1094 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 7 of 8 9. Shallow soil sample locations at a 50 ft x 50 ft grid to test for metals, pH, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), and semi-volatile organic compounds (including PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 10. Groundwater monitoring including installation of at least three perimeter groundwater monitoring wells and at least four (quarterly/semi -annual) groundwater sampling events 11. Soil Management Plan (SMP) 12. Soil vapor surveying beneath the proposed future buildings and in the vicini ty of the landfill area 13. Geotechnical investigations and recommendations for the proposed building 14. Hazardous materials removal monitoring and soils remediation monitoring during construction 15. Prepare hydrology analysis water quality management plan The scope of work is limited to pre-construction services; additional services during construction will be revisited at a later time once the scope of the overall project is further defined. Options for Council Consideration: Option 1: Approve Contract (Recommended)  Proceed with environmental assessment  Continue with on-going architectural programming  Improve public and employee safety  Establish estimated cost for replacement of existing facility and abatement/remediation  Cost control through urgent repairs Option 2: Do Not Approve Contract  Architectural programming effort will not continue  Loss of significant staff time to research and prepare RFP and advance selection process  Continued delays replacing outdated facility  Potential safety risks  Growing urgency for repair and renovation  More administrative burden for repair and maintenance procurements  Higher future replacement cost if deferred further Fiscal Impact: Page 1095 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 8 of 8 Currently, CIP 615 New Corporate Yard Facilities is budgeted for $1,889,278. There is sufficient funds available for the environmental assessment services in the CIP Project Budget. No additional appropriation is required. Agreement Request Agreement Request Amount FY 2025-26 Budget Dept. Account # Total Contract Amount Roux Associates, Inc. $ 498,800 301-8615-4201 $ 498,800 Project Contingency $ 75,000 $ 75,000 Total: $ 573,800 $ 573,800 Attachments: 1. RFP 26-003 City Yard Project Environmental Assessment Services 2. Roux Associates, Inc. Proposal 3. Proposed Professional Services Agreement with Roux Associates, Inc. Respectfully Submitted by: Randy Nguyen, Senior Engineer Concur: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 1096 of 1339 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 26-003 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL ACT (CEQA) PROJECT ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY YARD REPLACEMENT PROJECT IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Department of Public Works 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0210 Page 1097 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 56 RFP NUMBER: RFP# 26-003 RFP TITLE: CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL ACT (CEQA) PROJECT ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY YARD REPLACEMENT PROJECT REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: Public Works – Engineering Division RELEASE DATE: February 19, 2026 DUE DATE: March 16, 2026 @ 3:00 p.m. PST Notice is hereby given that the Department of Public Works of the City of Hermosa Beach will receive proposals for: RFP# 26-003, CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL ACT (CEQA) PROJECT ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY YARD REPLACEMENT PROJECT Proposals must be submitted as PDF via the PlanetBids Portal (pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/51313/portal-home). Proposals will be received until 3:00 p.m. PST, March 16, 2026. Proposals will not be opened at that time but will be submitted to the Public Works Department for verification and compliance with Specifications and subsequent recommendation to City Council for award of a contract or rejection of the responses, as deemed appropriate. The City reserves the right to make no award. All questions regarding the content of the proposal may be submitted on the PlanetBids Portal. Please direct any other inquiries to Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director, at jsanclemente@hermosabeach.gov. www.hermosabeach.gov BEACH HERMOSA OF CITY 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA, 90254 Phone: (310) 318-0210 Page 1098 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 56 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Invitation for Proposals .................................................................................................... 4 1.2 RFP Timeline ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Submittal Procedures ...................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Protest Procedures........................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Contact ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.6 General RFP Conditions .................................................................................................. 6 2. Project Overview ................................................................................................................ 11 2.1 City Location and Characteristics................................................................................ 11 Figure 1. Project Area ......................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Objective and Goals..................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Previous Reports ............................................................................................................ 12 3. Scope of Services ............................................................................................................... 19 4. Proposal Submittal Instructions .......................................................................................... 22 4.1 Proposal Format ............................................................................................................. 22 4.2 Proposal Content ........................................................................................................... 22 4.2.1 Cover Letter ............................................................................................................ 22 4.2.2 Firm Profile ............................................................................................................... 22 4.2.3 Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work ................................... 23 4.2.4 Project Management Plan .................................................................................... 20 4.2.5 Experience and Qualifications .............................................................................. 21 4.2.6 Required Forms ....................................................................................................... 22 4.2.7 Cost Proposal .......................................................................................................... 23 5. Proposal Evaluation and Selection .................................................................................... 23 5.1 Proposal Review Process .............................................................................................. 23 5.2 Evaluation Critera .......................................................................................................... 24 6. Contract Expectations ........................................................................................................ 29 6.1 Contract Period ............................................................................................................. 30 6.2 Professional Services Agreement ................................................................................. 30 6.3 Standards of Work ......................................................................................................... 30 6.4 Invoicing and Payment................................................................................................. 30 7. Attachments and Required Forms ..................................................................................... 31 7.1 Sample Professional Services Agreement ................................................................... 31 7.2 Required Forms .............................................................................................................. 52 7.2.1 Certification of Proposal......................................................................................... 52 7.2.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit ........................................................................................... 54 7.2.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements .......................................................... 55 7.2.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement .................................... 56 Page 1099 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 56 1 Introduction 1.1 Invitation for Proposals The City of Hermosa Beach, Public Works Department is seeking proposals from qualified individuals or firms (“Consultant”) to provide California Environmental Quality Control Act (CEQA) Project Analysis and other Environmental Services for the Public Works Department. Consultants must have the expertise, experience, and demonstrate resources available to perform the work described in this request for proposals (RFP). Should an award be made, the selected Consultant(s) will enter into a professional services agreement with the City of Hermosa Beach to provide these services. The City anticipates a contract start date in April 2026. 1.2 Project Timeline RFP posted February 19, 2026 Deadline to submit written questions March 3, 2026 Posting of responses to questions March 5, 2026 Deadline to submit proposals March 16 @ 3 PM PST Interviews for selected firms if the City wishes to do so TBD ~ Week of March 23rd Tentative award Issuing of Notice to Proceed Final environmental document complete City Council adoption of environmental document April 14, 2026 Summer 2026 TBD Page 1100 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 56 1.3 Submittal Procedures Proposes shall submit one copy of the proposal and one copy of the fee schedule in PDF format on the PlanetBids Portal. No proposals will be accepted after the listed date and time. The format, content, and procedures for submitting a proposal are provided in further detail within the RFP. (Check Section 4 for complete submittal procedures) 1.4 Protest Procedures Proposers may file a “protest” of a proposal/statement of qualification with the City’s City Manager. In order for a Proposer’s protest to be considered valid, the protest must: A. Be filed in writing within five (5) calendar days after submittal deadline, or where the Protest relates solely to events occurring thereafter, within five (5) calendar days after the event or occurrence giving rise to the protest; B. Clearly identify the specific irregularity or accusation; C. Clearly identify the specific City staff determination or recommendation being protested; D. Specify in detail the grounds for protest and the facts supporting the protest; E. Include all relevant supporting documentation with the protest at time of filing; and F. Be transmitted concurrently to all other parties with a direct financial interest that may be adversely affected by the outcome of the protest. Such parties shall include all other Proposers or proposers who appear to have a reasonable prospect of receiving an award depending upon the outcome of the protest. If the protest does not comply with each of these requirements, the City may reject the protest with or without further review. If the protest is timely and complies with the above requirements, the City Manager, or other designated City staff member, shall review the protest, any response from the challenged Proposer(s), and all other relevant information, and will provide a written decision to the protestor. This administrative procedure and the time limits set forth herein are mandatory. Failure to comply with these mandatory procedures shall constitute a waiver of any right to pursue the protest, including filing a Government Code claim or any legal proceedings or actions. Page 1101 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 of 56 1.5 Contact All questions regarding the content of the proposal must be submitted on the PlanetBids Portal. Responses to all questions will be posted on the PlanetBids Portal. Please direct any other inquiries regarding this RFP to Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director, at jsanclemente@hermosabeach.gov. 1.6 General RFP Conditions The following instructions and conditions apply to this RFP: Pre-Contractual Expenses The City of Hermosa Beach shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by any consultant. In addition, no consultant shall include any such expenses as part of the price proposed. Pre-contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by bidders in: • Preparing a proposal in response to this RFP. • Submitting that proposal to the City of Hermosa Beach. • Negotiating with the City of Hermosa Beach any matter related to this RFP, proposal, and/or contractual agreement. • Any other expenses incurred by the consultant prior to the date of an executed contract. Authority to Withdraw RFP and/or Not Award Contract The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time for any reason without prior notice. Further, the City makes no representations that any agreement will be awarded to any consultant responding to this RFP. The City expressly reserves the right to reject any and all proposals in response to this RFP without indicating any reasons for such rejection(s). The release of this RFP does not obligate or compel the City to enter into a contract or agreement. Authority to Revise RFP and Request Additional Information The City reserves the rights to amend the RFP at any time, to determine the successful respondent(s), and to reject any or all Proposals or their components. Should it be necessary for the City to issue addendums to this RFP during the proposal period, the City will post addendums to the PlanetBids Portal. It is the responsibility of all prospective proposers to check PlanetBids regularly to see whether any addenda or supplemental Page 1102 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 7 of 56 materials have been issued. Proposals shall acknowledge that the consultant is aware of all addendums which have been issued and has incorporated their provisions in their proposal by completing the Certification of Proposal Form. The City reserves the right to request additional information or clarifications from consultants where it may serve the City’s best interest. Other Conditions • ADDITIONAL SERVICES. The Scope of Work describes the minimum work to be accomplished. Upon final selection of the firm(s), the Scope of Work may be modified and refined during negotiations with the City. Any proposer that provides additional services can include those services in the proposal and list them as additional services. • AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES. Every proposal must be signed by the person or persons legally authorized to bind the consultant to a contract for the execution of the work. Upon request of the City, any agent submitting a proposal on behalf of a consultant shall provide a current power of attorney certifying the agent’s authority to bind the consultant. • AWARD OF PROPOSAL. City reserves the right to negotiate final terms with the selected consultant, if any. Award may be made to the consultant offering the most advantageous proposal after consideration of all criteria. • COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. All proposals shall comply with current federal, state, and other laws relative thereto. • CONFLICT OF INTEREST. By signing the Certification of Proposal, the consultant declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Qualifications, consultant declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. • DISQUALIFICATION OF PROPOSER. If there is reason to believe that collusion exists among the consultants, the City may refuse to consider proposals from participants in such collusion. No person, firm, or corporation under the same or different name, shall make, file, or be interested in more than one proposal for the same work unless alternate proposals are called for. Reasonable grounds for believing that any consultant is interested in more than one Proposal for the same work will cause the rejection of all Proposals for the work in which a consultant is interested. Consultants shall submit as part of their Proposal documents the completed Non-Collusion Affidavit. Page 1103 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 8 of 56 • EXAMINATION OF DOCUMENTS. It is the responsibility of the consultant to carefully and thoroughly examine and be familiar with these RFP documents, general conditions, all forms, specifications, drawings, plans, and addendums (if any). Consultants shall satisfy themselves as to the character, quantity, and quality of work to be performed and materials, labor, supervision necessary to perform the work as specified by these documents. The failure or neglect of the consultant to examine documents shall in no way relieve the consultant from any obligations with respect to the solicitation for and subsequent contract that may be awarded. The submission of a proposal shall constitute an acknowledgment upon which the City may rely that the consultant has thoroughly examined and is familiar with the RFP documents. The failure or neglect of a consultant to receive or examine any of the documents shall in no way relieve the consultant from any obligations with respect to the proposal. No claim will be allowed for additional compensation that is based upon a lack of knowledge of any solicitation document. • INTERPRETATION OF RFP DOCUMENTS. City reserves the right to make corrections or clarifications of the information provided in this RFP. If any person is in doubt as to the true meaning of any part of this RFP documents, or finds discrepancies or omissions in the document, the person may submit to the City a written request for an interpretation or correction. Oral statement(s), interpretations or clarifications concerning meaning or intent of the contents of this RFP by any person are unauthorized and invalid. Modifications to the RFP, including, but not limited to the scope of work, can be made only by written addendum issued by the City. Proposers shall submit all questions in writing to the contact listed in the announcement or submitted on the PlanetBids Portal. Proposers may not contact any other staff members with questions. The requesting party is responsible for prompt delivery of any requests. When the City considers interpretations necessary, interpretations will be in the form of an addendum to the RFP documents, and when issued, will be sent as promptly as is practical to all parties recorded by the City as having received RFP documents. All such addenda shall become a part of the RFP document. It is the responsibility of each consultant to ensure the City has their correct business name, mailing address and e-mail address on file through the PlanetBids online portal. Any prospective consultants who obtained a set of RFP documents from the PlanetBids online portal are responsible for checking PlanetBids to verify if any subsequent Addendums were issued. • IRREGULARITIES. City reserves the right to waive non-material irregularities if such would be in the best interest of the City as determined by the City Manager. • NON-DISCRIMINATION. Consultant represents and warrants that it does not and will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, gender, color, national origin, sexual orientation, ancestry, marital status, physical condition, pregnancy or pregnancy-related condition, political affiliation or opinion, age or medical condition. Page 1104 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 9 of 56 • NON-EXCLUSIVE. Should the City make an award, the successful consultant will enter into a NON-EXCLUSIVE professional services agreement and the City reserves the right to enter into agreements with other firms. • OFFERS OF MORE THAN ONE PRICE. Consultants are NOT allowed to submit more than one cost proposal. • OWNERSHIP. All data, documents and other products used or developed during the RFP process become the property of the City upon submission. All documents submitted in response to this RFP shall become the property of the City and a matter of public record pursuant to Government Code sections 6250 et seq. Proposals should not be marked as confidential or proprietary, and City may refuse to consider a proposal so marked. All information contained within the proposals will become a matter of public record. It is the responsibility of each bidder to clearly identify any and all information contained within its bid proposal that it considers to be confidential and/or proprietary. To the extent that the City agrees with that designation, such information will be held in confidence whenever possible. All other information will be considered public. • PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. Prior to awarding any work, the selected Consultant will be required to execute a professional services agreement (sample attached) with the City. Any proposed change to the agreement shall be identified in the response to the Request for Qualifications (RFP) and shall be subject to the sole approval of the City. The City requires the Consultant to obtain and maintain a policy of professional liability and other insurance as indicated in the agreement. • NO PUBLIC OPENING/PUBLIC RECORDS ACT. Proposals shall be opened and their contents secured by City staff to prevent disclosure during the evaluation process and the process of negotiating with competing consultants. Adequate precautions shall be taken to treat each consultant fairly and to ensure that information gleaned from competing proposals is not disclosed to other Consultants. Prices and other information concerning the proposals shall not be disclosed until a recommendation for award is made to the awarding authority. • PUBLIC RECORD. All proposals submitted in response to this RFP will become the property of the City upon submittal and a matter of public record when the City selects a proposer for recommendation to the City Council for its consideration pursuant to applicable law. • REPRESENTATIONS. Consultant understands and acknowledges that the representations made in their submitted proposal are material and important and will be relied on by the City in evaluation of the proposal. Consultant misrepresentation shall be treated as fraudulent concealment from the City of the facts relating to the proposal. • SEVERABILITY. If any provisions or portion of any provision, of this Request for Qualifications are held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, they shall be severed from Page 1105 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 10 of 56 the Request for Qualifications and the remaining provisions shall be valid and enforceable. • SUBCONTRACTOR INFORMATION. If the proposal includes the use of subconsultants, consultant must identify specific subconsultants and the specific requirements of this RFP for which each proposed subconsultant would perform services. All subconsultants for work services must follow all required provisions of the prime contract. • VALIDITY. Proposal must be valid for a period of 90 days from the due date. • WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL. Consultants’ authorized representative may withdraw Proposals only by written request received by this RFP contact personnel before the Proposal Submittal Deadline. • BUSINESS LICENSE. The selected firm(s) must obtain a City of Hermosa Beach Business license and maintain a current certificate of insurance with the City for the duration of the Professional Service Agreement. Page 1106 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 11 of 56 2. Project Overview 2.1 City Location and Characteristics The City of Hermosa Beach is located within the southwestern coastal portion of Los Angeles County in what is commonly referred to locally as the “South Bay” area. The City is bounded on the north by the City of Manhattan Beach, on the south by the City of Redondo Beach, on the east by the City of Redondo Beach and the City of Manhattan Beach, and on the west by the Pacific Ocean. The City limits for Hermosa Beach encompass a relatively small land area, approximately 1.4 square miles. Hermosa Beach is thriving, and engaged community, with some 20,000 residents and naturally draws a high number of visitors to its beaches and downtown. Governed by a five-member City Council with members elected at large, Hermosa Beach operates under the council/city manager form of government as a general law city. Like the community, the Council is informed, educated, and engaged. The programs and services provided by the City are accomplished through seven City departments: Administrative Services, City Clerk, City Manager, Community Development, Parks and Recreation, Police, and Public Works. Figure 1. Project Area Page 1107 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 12 of 56 2.2 Objective and Goals The City of Hermosa Beach is seeking proposals from qualified firms to serve as the City’s technical team for the preparation of a legally defensible environmental review for the City Yard replacement project, located at 555 6th Street, Hermosa Beach CA 90254 (APN 4187-031-900). The selected team will also provide various environmental and hazardous materials consulting services to obtain regulatory approvals to remediate the site. Project Background The City of Hermosa Beach’s current City Maintenance Yard consists of two maintenance buildings, an office trailer, several equipment storage containers, a vehicle washout area, and a construction materials storage area. The City plans to replace the existing City Yard with a new Maintenance Facility on the same site that consolidates two other City-owned maintenance/storage sheds onto the project site. The City is also preliminarily considering consolidating other administrative City offices at this location, but the City has not yet made a final determination on the entire project scope. The City may consider temporarily locating these maintenance services on other City-owned property, including at 552 11th Place, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, while the project is under construction. Figure 2. 552 11th Place 2.3 Previous Reports Proposers should review and consider the work already completed at the Project site for previously considered projects. Some, if not all, of these reports should be referenced in future deliverables. The City does not desire to duplicate the extensive efforts of previous consultants. The goal for this project is to supplement existing data where needed to complete the scope of services referenced in Section 3. Page 1108 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 13 of 56 Exhibit 1: Tank Closure Report for 555 6th Street, Hermosa Beach (GeoResearch 1989) Two 550 gallon USTs were removed from the site in January 1988. The closure report notes that the tanks were used to store gasoline; however, other County public works files note that the tanks contained either fuel, thinner, or paint wastewater. The closure report figures show that the tanks were located approximately 35-40 feet west and 10-15 feet north of the corner of Valley Drive and 6th Street. This places the former tanks beneath the southern-most portion of the older site building; although the closure report figures do not show this building. Five 40-foot-deep soil borings were advanced; three of the borings were in the vicinity of the former tanks. Samples from 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 feet below ground surface (bgs) were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH); no TPH was detected in the soil samples. Exhibit 2: Phase I ESA (Entrix 1994) – Report Not Available The report noted the site operations including a maintenance building, drum storage area, vehicle washout area, asphalt batching area, an oil well, and two UST areas. Soil vapor sampling was conducted in the vicinity of the USTs and no significant release from the USTs was identified. Exhibit 3: Subsurface Investigation (Entrix 1995) Soil samples were collected in the vicinity of the maintenance building (grounds keeping, paint room, petroleum, and drum storage areas), the former City dump, the vehicle washout/UST area, the asphalt batching area, and the former oil production area. The soil samples were collected from depths up to 46 feet bgs and analyzed for TPH and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Select samples were also analyzed for metals and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). No VOCs or PCBs were detected in the soil samples. TPH was detected in 5 of 23 samples at concentrations of 730 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 36,000 mg/kg. The majority of the TPH detections were from the former City dump area. The highest TPH concentration was detected at 20 feet bgs. Elevated metals (cadmium and lead above regulatory screening levels) were detected in the former City dump area, with the highest concentrations detected at 15 feet bgs. Exhibit 4: Environmental Closure Report for the Removal of USTs (Geo-Cal 1998) Two 4,000 gallon gasoline USTs and one 2,000 gallon diesel UST, along with two dispensers, were removed from the site in 1998. Two soil samples were collected under each former tank, one sample along the piping, and one sample under each former dispenser. The soil samples were analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), and TPH gas and diesel. With the exception of one detection of TPH diesel at 15 mg/kg, none of these compounds were detected in the soil samples at concentrations greater than the laboratory reporting limits. Page 1109 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 14 of 56 Exhibit 5: Report of Well Plugging and Abandonment (DOGGR 2005) In 2005, the City received a signed Report of Well Plugging and Abandonment from the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) indicating the completion and inspection for the plugging and abandonment of well “Stinnet 1” on the 555 6th Street Site. Exhibit 6: Geotechnical Investigation Report (Geo-Environmental 2008) The purpose of this geotechnical investigation was to provide geotechnical recommendations for the construction of a new 13,000-square foot two-story masonry- block maintenance and vehicle repair building, including office and restroom areas. The proposed construction assumed the inclusion of grading, drainage, utilities, retaining walls, and other related facilities. The scope of the report consisted of the following: • Data review and the preparation of a subsurface exploration program, • A field investigation consisting of a site reconnaissance, the marking of boring locations, the drilling of five (5) hollow-stem auger soil borings, and the collection of drive and bulk soil samples from the borings, • Laboratory testing of selected soil samples obtained from the soil borings, • Geotechnical engineering analysis, and • The preparation of a geotechnical report presenting our conclusions and recommendations. Exhibit 7: Phase I ESA, City of Hermosa Beach Maintenance Yard (Brycon 2012a) The Phase I ESA identified the City dump and maintenance areas as potential areas of concern. The Phase I ESA recommended further sampling in these areas. Exhibit 8: Phase II ESA, City of Hermosa Beach Maintenance Yard (Brycon 2012b) Seventy-three soil samples were collected from 11 soil borings advanced to up to 44 feet bgs. All soil samples were analyzed for TPH, while the 13 samples with the highest TPH concentrations were also analyzed for VOCs. Twenty-six of the samples were also analyzed for metals and/or lead. Elevated concentrations of diesel-range TPH (up to 10,500 mg/kg) were detected in the area of the former dump. The highest TPH concentration was detected at 25 feet bgs. Elevated concentrations of lead (up to 9,680 mg/kg) were also detected in the area of the former dump. The highest concentration of lead was detected at 15 feet bgs. Page 1110 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 15 of 56 BTEX was detected in one boring in the former dump area at concentrations of 0.015 mg/kg benzene, 0.07 mg/kg ethylbenzene, and 0.015 mg/kg xylenes. The report concluded that TPH impacts are primarily in the deeper soils of the former dump area (25 to 44 feet bgs), while metals impacts were limited to the upper 25 feet in the former dump area. Exhibit 9: Remedial Action Plan (Brycon 2012c) The Remedial Action Plan identifies approximately 9,000 cubic yards of lead-impacted soils and an additional 4,500 cubic yards of TPH-impacted soils. The report also evaluates potential remedial alternatives for soil remediation. Exhibit 10: Report on Groundwater Assessment (Brycon 2013) Groundwater was encountered at the site around 50 feet bgs. Groundwater grab samples were collected from three borings advanced in the former landfill area. The samples were analyzed for TPH, metals, VOCs, pH, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, and chlorides. Elevated TPH diesel was detected in one of the groundwater samples (104 milligrams per liter (mg/L)). Naphthalene was also detected in the same groundwater sample (12 micrograms per liter (mg/L)). Elevated lead, arsenic, and barium (greater than the maximum contaminant level) were also detected. The report stated that the TPH concentrations were likely due to the former City dump, whereas the source of the elevated metals was unknown. The report noted that the groundwater in the vicinity of the site would not typically be used for drinking water and may not require remediation. Exhibit 11: Data Gap Analysis (McDaniel Lambert 2013) At the request of the City, McDaniel Lambert reviewed existing data to identify data gaps in order to ensure sufficient data exists to support future risk management decisions. Their review identified data gaps related to (1) adequate vertical (particularly shallow) and spatial soil sampling coverage, (2) adequate data to assess the full site of semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, PAHs), and (3) the absence of soil gas data. McDaniel Lambert also prepared data quality objectives (DQOs) to define the type, quality and quantity of data necessary to support future decisions. Exhibit 12: Report of Findings, Supplemental Site Assessment Activities (Padre 2014) Soil vapor samples were collected from two locations near the northern maintenance building at depths of 5 and 15 feet bgs. Additionally, soil samples were collected from 12 locations throughout the site, at a depth of approximately 2 feet bgs. Page 1111 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 16 of 56 The soil vapor samples were analyzed for TPH gas and VOCs. TPH gas was detected in all the soil vapor samples at concentrations ranging from 660 to 1,600 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3). Several VOCs were detected at the site, including methyl ethyl ketone (up to 60 µg/m3), benzene (up to 85 µg/m3), and tetrachloroethylene (PCE; up to 620 µg/m3). The highest soil vapor concentrations were generally detected in the deeper samples. The soil samples were analyzed for TPH, VOCs, metals, semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), organochlorine pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls. The pesticide chlordane was detected in four of the samples at concentrations up to 44 micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg). The PAHs fluoranthene (0.106 mg/kg) and pyrene (0.119 mg/kg) were the only SVOCs detected in the soil samples. Elevated lead concentrations, with soluble threshold limit concentration (STLC) lead detected above 5 mg/L, were detected in four samples. No other metals impacts were identified. While concentrations of TPH diesel and motor oil were detected, all of the detected concentrations were less than 1,000 mg/kg. No VOCs or PCBs were detected at concentrations greater than the laboratory reporting limits. Exhibit 13: Limited Asbestos and Lead Inspections (Patriot Laboratory Services 2015) The purpose of the inspections was to determine if asbestos and lead are present in any of the building materials soon to be disturbed during future demolition. Exhibit 14: Supplemental Site Investigation (Dudek 2018) Dudek prepared a Supplemental Site Investigation Report that included soil, soil vapor, and groundwater sampling to supplement the existing data in order to prepare a human health risk assessment and evaluate the site impacts of a proposed new City Yard development. Additionally, the SSI data was collected in order to evaluate potential impacts to groundwater from the site. Exhibit 15: Health Risk Assessment (Environmental Health Decisions 2018) The purpose of this assessment was to evaluate the potential health risks associated with soil contact and inhalation of vapors that could migrate from soil vapor and groundwater at the Hermosa Beach City Yard project during redevelopment of the site. The maximum detected concentrations of chemicals detected in soil and soil vapor and the maximum detected concentrations of VOC in groundwater were assessed for potential health risks to outdoor industrial workers and indoor commercial workers. Potential exposures to chemicals in soil currently exceed health risk-based standards. Responsible chemicals are arsenic, TPH in the C13-C22 range, cadmium, and lead. It is likely that arsenic is present at background concentrations and should therefore not be Page 1112 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 17 of 56 included in the risk assessment. Chemicals detected in soil vapor and groundwater do not present an unacceptable health risk in regards to vapor migration to indoor air for a commercial worker. Exhibit 16: Corrective Action Plan (Dudek 2019) The Corrective Action Plan was developed to obtain voluntary oversight of site remediation to be conducted prior to the proposed City Yard project. A former City dump was located in the northeastern portion of the site (landfilled area). Metals and petroleum impacts have been identified in this area. Based on the 2018 human health risk assessment (Environmental Health Decisions 2018), the human health risk at the site is limited to exposure of outdoor construction workers via direct contact. This CAP presents the remedial action alternatives to mitigate the noted human health risk during construction grading, when direct contact with landfill materials could occur. Additionally, the CAP considers remedial alternatives to mitigate the human health risk that could occur from potential future direct contact after construction. Exhibit 17: Corrective Action Plan Approval (LA County Fire, Site Mitigation Unit 2020) The County letter indicates the review of background reports and the 2019 Dudek Corrective Action Plan and provide conditional approval of the proposed Corrective Action Workplan. The selected plan (Alternative 2) involves the removal of the landfill material to 2 – 4 feet bgs within the landfilled area, characterization and off-site disposal of the material, placement of an asphalt or concrete cap, and implementation of institutional controls. Exhibit 18: Phase I Environmental Assessment Report for 552 11th Place (Converse 2005) The Phase I ESA identified the potential for environmental impact due to historical manufacturing property usage, a historical railroad track at the northeastern boundary of the property, and adjacent site usage by Western Fuel Gas & Power Co. The Phase I ESA recommended further sampling of the property. Exhibit 19: Phase II Environmental Assessment Report for 552 11th Place (Converse 2005) The Phase II ESA recommended the following scope of work: • Six (6) borings to a maximum depth of 20-feet below ground surface (bgs) in the interior of the building and at the location of the former railroad track on the exterior of the Property. Soil samples were collected at approximately 2-feet bgs, 5-feet bgs, and continuing at 5-foot intervals to boring depth. • Soil samples from 2-feet bgs, 5-feet bgs, and 15-feet bgs were analyzed in accordance with the following Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Test Methods: EPA Test Method 8015, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, Carbon Chain Page 1113 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 18 of 56 (TPH-cc); EPA Test Method 82608, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs); EPA Test Method 8270, Semi Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs); EPA Test Method 9045A, pH; and EPA 6010/7471A, Title 22 Metals. • Samples not analyzed (10-feet bgs and 20-feet bgs) were archived pending the results of the initial laboratory report. • Soil samples analyzed for VOCs were collected in accordance with EPA Sampling Method 5035. Exhibit 20: Addendum – Phase II Environmental Assessment Report for 552 11th Place (Converse 2005) Following the completion of the Phase Il Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report dated June 10, 2005, Converse completed the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test on sample GP-5 at 2-feet bgs, and step out sampling in the vicinity of borings GP-1 (in the northwestern portion of the building) and GP-5 (on the northeastern portion of the Property). Page 1114 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 19 of 56 3. Scope of Services The 1.3–acre site is located at 555 6th Street in Hermosa Beach and is occupied by the existing City of Hermosa Beach Public Works City Yard Facilities. The site location and existing facilities are shown in Figures 1 through 3. The City is interested in remediating the site prior to replacing the existing maintenance facility buildings and services. The City is also considering consolidating maintenance operations with City Engineering office operations, and Emergency Operations Center (EOC) services currently located other City-owned facility locations to this project site. The project would include remediating the site, demolishing existing structures, and constructing new buildings and outdoor facilities at 555 6th Street and may include temporary relocation to 552 11th Place. The Successful Consultant will prepare a CEQA Initial Study (IS) to determine if a Negative Declaration (ND), Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), or Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required. The City may pursue CEQA analysis only or a combined CEQA/NEPA analysis, depending on funding sources for the project. Tasks will include: A. Technical Studies: Identify and perform necessary technical studies such as aesthetics, agriculture, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology, greenhouse gases, hydrology and water quality, land use, noise, population/housing, public services, transportation/traffic, utilities, and wildfire risks. and any necessary studies required to complete the environmental documents. B. Draft & Final CEQA Documents: Prepare necessary documents and handle public review periods and public notification requirements. Documents shall include associated graphics, illustrations, data, and supporting information. C. OPTIONAL – Combined CEQA/NEPA: Prepare necessary documents and handle public review periods and public notification requirements. Documents shall include associated graphics, illustrations, data, and supporting information. D. Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program (MMRP): Develop a plan for ensuring compliance with mitigation measures. E. Public Outreach: Provide necessary public outreach, information, and public meetings attendance in support of the CEQA documentation process. F. Project Management: Attend meetings with City staff, applicant team, other agencies, stakeholders, and members of the public. G. Hazardous Materials Studies updated for new regulations and/or screening levels: i. Environmental Site Assessments and Supplementary Site Investigations: provide an updated Phase II ESA and/or Supplementary Site Investigation as needed to account for any new regulations or screening levels since the previous studies were performed in 2012 (Brycon) and 2018 (Dudek), Page 1115 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 20 of 56 ii. Hazardous Materials Surveys: provide an updated Lead, Asbestos, and PCB survey as needed to account for any new regulations or screening levels since the previous surveys were completed in 2015 (Patriot Environmental Laboratory Services) iii. Human Health Risk Assessment: provide an updated Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) as needed to account for any new regulations or screening levels since the previous HHRA was completed in 2018 (Environmental Health Decisions). The data shall be of sufficient quality for the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) to evaluate the health risks and hazards associated with the onsite contaminants. A human health risk evaluation prepared by a qualified toxicologist or other qualified health professional would be required. iv. Corrective Action Plan: provide an updated Corrective Action Plan (CAP) as needed to account for any new regulations or screening levels since the previous CAP was completed in 2019 (Dudek). The updated CAP shall include the analysis of the application of SCAQMD Rules 1166 and 1466 that were not addressed in the previous report. H. Health and Safety Plan: provide a site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP), which meets the applicable requirements of the California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 5192, “Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response.” The HASP should address work procedures and personal protective equipment applicable to protect future site construction workers associated with the proposed CAP field activities. The HASP should also address the safety of offsite sensitive receptors. I. Workplan Addendum to the previous Corrective Action Plan: provide a brief workplan addendum (including a figure) proposing additional surficial soil sampling locations in future grading areas where the surficial soil has not yet been assessed (including beneath existing structures that will be demolished), prior to any future grading activities. The additional shallow soil sample locations should be placed throughout the site to assure adequate sample density/coverage (i.e., equivalent to a 50 ft x 50 ft grid). In addition to metals, the surficial soil samples should also be analyzed for pH and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), and if TPH is detected, selected soil samples should be re-analyzed for semi-volatile organic compounds (including PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The Workplan will also need to be updated should another Corrective Action Alternative be selected as most appropriate for remediation of the site. J. Groundwater Monitoring: provide groundwater sampling and monitoring, including installation of at least three perimeter groundwater monitoring wells at the site to monitor contaminant concentrations and evaluate direction and gradient of groundwater flow for at least four (quarterly/semi-annual) groundwater sampling events. Provide all monitoring and reporting for the installed wells. Page 1116 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 21 of 56 K. Soil Management Plan: Provide a Soil Management Plan (SMP) to address procedures that would be implemented at the site if previously unknown contamination or associated structures (e.g., drums, clarifiers, USTs, septic tanks, etc.) were to be encountered. L. Soil Vapor Surveying: post-grading soil vapor survey beneath the proposed future buildings, as well as additional soil vapor sampling (with dual-nested soil vapor probes), in the vicinity of the landfill area where the previous onsite maximum concentration of tetrachloroethylene was detected. Soil vapor samples should be collected at depths of five feet and 15 feet below the ground surface (bgs). M. Services Leading to a No Further Action (NFA) Letter: the selected consultant will interface with Local, State and Federal regulatory agencies as needed and submit Closure Reports to obtain any approvals required for the cleanup of the project area and comply with all laws, regulations, notices or applicable restrictions. The final result should be No Further Action letters from all regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over the project site. If a NFA letter is not possible due to the remediation method selected, assist the City with filing all environmental notifications/restrictions with the County Recorder (i.e. deed restrictions) identifying the onsite contaminant concentrations/locations, as well as any associated mitigation measures (such as capping), and restricting the site to commercial/industrial uses. N. OPTIONAL – Monitoring During Construction: provide hazardous materials removal monitoring and soils remediation monitoring services during the construction phase of the project in accordance with Local, State, and Federal regulatory guidelines. Hazardous materials removals monitors shall be Certified Industrial Hygienists (CIH). Soils remediation monitoring requirements and certifications will be determined following the selection of an appropriate remediation method. Page 1117 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 22 of 56 4. Proposal Submittal Instructions 4.1 Proposal Format Proposes shall submit one copy of the proposal and one copy of the fee schedule in PDF format on the PlanetBids Portal. 4.2 Proposal Content Proposals must be concise, but with sufficient detail to allow accurate evaluation and comparative analysis. Proposals should be straightforward and provide "layman" explanations of technical terms that are used. Emphasis should be concentrated on conforming to the RFP instructions, responding to the RFP requirements, and on providing a complete and clear description of the offer. Proposals should include the sections as described in greater detail below. Do NOT include marketing brochures or other promotional material not connected with this RFP. 4.2.1 Cover Letter Proposal must be accompanied by a cover letter signed by an individual authorized to bind the proposing entity. An unsigned proposal is grounds for rejection. The cover letter should include an introduction of the firm, contact information, summary statement of professional qualifications, and statement of understanding of the scope of work. The cover letter also shall acknowledge receipt of any addendums that were issued for this RFP. 4.2.2 Firm Profile Proposers should provide a brief profile of the prime consultant and any sub-consultants. The profile should include, but is not limited to, the following information: • Official name and address. • Name, address, email, and telephone number of the consultant’s primary point of contact. • Type of business entity of consultant (corporation, company, joint venture, etc.). Please enclose a copy of the Joint Venture Agreement if entity is a joint venture. • Federal Employer I.D. Number. • Address, telephone numbers and fax numbers of each of the proposing firm’s locations. • Indication whether firm is totally or partially owned by another business organization (parent company) or individual. Page 1118 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 23 of 56 • Number of years consultant has been in business under the present business name. • Number of years of experience the consultant has had in providing required, equivalent, or related services. • Any failures or refusals to complete a contract, and explanation. 4.2.3 Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work Proposers should include in this section a statement of project understanding, approach to work program and summary of deliverables, described in greater detail below. Statement of Project Understanding Consultant must include in this section its understanding of the project and understanding of the Scope of Services noted herein. Consultant should be able to articulate a thorough understanding of the State, County and Local requirements, and other industry standards applicable to the project or services to be provided. Approach to Work Program The City is seeking an effective, efficient and creative approach to preparing work products and meeting the City’s goals and timelines. In this section, proposers should include their recommended approach to providing the requested professional services and tasks noted in the Scope of Services in the RFP. The approach to the work plan shall be of such detail to demonstrate the proposer’s ability to accomplish project objectives. This section should also include proposed approaches and techniques to engagement of community and stakeholders in the process of developing projects. The proposer’s approach should provide details on all tasks identified in the scope of services (3.A through 3.N), as well as any additional tasks or services recommended by the proposer to complete the project goals and objectives. Additional Services Consultant shall provide the City with any additional services that the firm can provide. Consultant may additionally itemize those services which are further beneficial but are not noted in the aforementioned paragraphs as requirements. Roles and Responsibilities for City Staff Proposer should summarize any services NOT provided by their firm that are listed in the Scope of Work. Consultant shall also list any resources, City assistance or other items expected to be provided by City, “Work to be Performed or Provided by the City”. 4.2.4 Project Management Plan Key to a creative, effective, and efficient delivery of projects is close coordination and communication between the City, community, and the selected consultant. In this Page 1119 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 24 of 56 section, proposers should provide information on scheduling and describe the firm’s approach to communications and quality assurance/quality control. Project Schedule Proposers must provide a project schedule with anticipated timeframe for key deliverables outlined in the scope of services and meets the Project Timeline identified in Section 1.2. Communications Approach Proposers should describe their recommended or preferred approach to project communications between the City and Consultant Team. This should include details on the frequency of project check-ins, progress updates, and meeting locations (i.e. phone, email, in-person). Communications protocols for coordinating with other City departments, agencies, and the community can be established during individual project kick-offs. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Approach Describe the firm’s QA/QC processes that will be adhered to during the term of the agreement. Describe the Consultant’s method of ensuring that the assigned personnel’s quality of work is high. 4.2.5 Experience and Qualifications Proposers should include in this section a summary of relevant projects, references, an organizational chart, and information about the experience, qualifications, and availability of key personnel, described in greater detail below. Summary of Relevant Projects Proposers should highlight representative projects that are similar in scope to the services requested to demonstrate the firm ’s depth of experience and familiarity with similar projects. For each project, please include the following information, at a minimum: • Year started and completed (if relevant) • Contracting Agency + Department • Project Description • Key Personnel Assigned • Contract Value References Page 1120 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 25 of 56 Consultant must provide at least three (3) public agency references for which consultant has provided services similar in scope as set forth in the RFP within the last five (5) years. Reference information should include: • Name of agency • Name of agency project manager • Email address and telephone number of contact person • Description of project or services provided Organizational Chart Consultant shall include an organizational chart that reflects key staff and roles/responsibilities of each individual assigned to provide services under this Proposal. Any roles or topics in which the proposer anticipates utilizing the expertise of subconsultants should be clearly identified. Experience and Qualifications of Key Personnel The consultant shall provide resumes indicating the experience and qualifications for the key personnel identified in the organization chart. Identify the firm’s lead Project Manager that will interface with the City on a regular basis. Consultant shall also include the additional support personnel who will be providing services on this project. At a minimum, the resume for each team member should include: • Name • Position and Role for This Project • Degrees and Certifications • Professional Memberships/Registrations • Summary of Experience • Work on Representative Projects that are Similar in Scope If subconsultants are to be used as part of this proposal, a resume of the key subconsultant staff and relevant experience is to be included in the same format. Assignment of Key Personnel It is the City’s preference to have the key personnel identified in the Organizational Chart remain with the individual project during its duration. In this section, please indicate the availability of key personnel to pursue the completion of this project/contract. After contract execution the Consultant should not substitute key personnel (project manager and others listed by name in the proposal) or subconsultants without prior Page 1121 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 26 of 56 written approval from the local agency. The consultant must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from the agency prior to use of a different subconsultant on the contract. The proposed substituted person must be as qualified as the original, and at the same or lower cost. In the event there are proposed changes in key personnel, including subconsultants, during the term of the agreement that are outside of the consulting firm’s control, the consultant shall prepare a transition plan that is presented to the City’s project manager for review. 4.2.6 Required Forms Consultant shall review, acknowledge and submit the following forms: • Certification of Proposal. Consultant is required to sign and submit the Certification of Proposal including acknowledgement that they have received and considered any addendums issued by the City of Hermosa Beach in connection with this RFP. (See section 7.2.1) • Non-Collusion Affidavit. Consultant is required to sign and submit the Non- Collusion Affidavit. (See section 7.2.2) • Compliance with Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall demonstrate the willingness and ability to submit proof of the required insurance coverage as set forth in the Sample Professional Services Agreement. (See section 7.2.3) • Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement. Consultant shall demonstrate willingness and ability to comply with the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement and/or indicate any exceptions to the Professional Services Agreement. (See section 7.2.4) 4.2.7 Cost Proposal The cost proposal shall be submitted through PlanetBids Portal as a separate file, labeled “Cost Proposal” and indicate the firm’s name. The cost proposal shall detail costs broken down by project phase, task, hourly rates, and key personnel. Consultant should provide the cost proposal for the duration of the agreement to successfully fulfill the Scope of Services detailed in this RFP. Optional tasks should be consistent with the tasks listed in the Scope of Services and be clearly marked in the cost proposal to facilitate consistent comparison of costs between proposals. The Cost Proposal should identify project team members, and hourly billing rates and break costs by task and phase. The fee schedule should also include any direct costs such as travel, equipment, printing/materials. The method of payment shall be primarily at Specified Rates of Compensation but may include Cost per Unit of Work. The proposal should include hourly rates for all types of personnel required to perform the services described in this RFP. Page 1122 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 27 of 56 No mark ups will be allowed for direct or miscellaneous costs and subconsultant work, however, an appropriate number of hours for subconsultant oversight will be allowed. 5. Proposal Evaluation and Selection Page 1123 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 28 of 56 5.1 Proposal Review Process The City will evaluate all proposals received in accordance with the evaluation criteria. The City shall not be obligated to accept the lowest priced fee schedule, but the City may make award(s) in the best interests of the City after all factors are considered, including, but not limited to, the demonstrated competence, experience and professional qualifications of the Proposer. Evaluation scores will not be released until after award of proposal, if one is made. Following the review of RFPs by the City’s team, the City may, if it chooses to do so, invite short-listed consultants to be interviewed by a panel of City staff, which may include non- city personnel at the City’s discretion. Discussions may, at the City's option, be conducted with the most qualified Proposers. Discussions may be for the purpose of clarification to assure full understanding of, and responsiveness to the solicitation requirements. Proposers shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and written revision of proposals. In conducting discussions, the City will not disclose information derived from proposals submitted by competing Proposers. The City will verify references of short-listed consultants, which may include persons not listed as references, and this will help inform the City’s decisions. The City will select a consultant to negotiate for the performance of work. In negotiating the contract the City may request modifications to the proposed scope or to the technical team or other elements of the proposal. If negotiations fail, the City will commence negotiations with the next qualified candidate. Work will promptly commence following contract award and satisfaction of contract requirements. 5.2 Evaluation Criteria Evaluation criteria will typically include RFP understanding, demonstrated expertise, relevant experience, availability of the firm’s team, and other factors. Task orders resulting from this contract will be negotiated and executed between the City and the selected firm. Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of their response to all provisions of this RFP. The City of Hermosa Beach will use the following criteria in its evaluation of proposals, interviews may be required with selected consultants, or verification of references. The categories will be weighted approximately as follows. Approach and Methods (40%): • A well thought-out and tailored approach to the technical work that responds to the City’s particular issues and needs. • Incorporation of innovative and/or creative approaches for providing the services that will maximize efficient, cost-effective operations or increased performance capabilities. Page 1124 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 29 of 56 • Evidence of the team’s ability to work collaboratively with other members of a multi-disciplinary team in a complex and dynamic working environment. • Demonstration of the team’s commitment to accurate and superior work products and services as detailed in the project management project management plan. Relevant Experience & Expertise (40%): • Recent experience preparing similar projects or providing similar services for jurisdictions. • Familiarity and experience with applicable industry standards and any relevant federal, state, or local regulatory requirements. • The depth and appropriateness of experience of individual members of the technical team as they relate to the specific technical tasks called for by the project. • The consultant team’s ability to dedicate a strong project manager that will serve as a single point of contact for the duration of the project. • The team’s experience and ability to clearly communicate technical concepts and terminology with the community. Administration (20%): • Display of responsive timeframe to assign tasks. • Evidence of the team’s ability to successfully deliver project tasks and deliverables within the identified project budget and minimize cost overruns • Billing rates, ability to comply with the timeline terms, and billing procedures. • The extent and nature of any proposed amendments to the City’s Professional Services Agreement. 6. Contract Expectations Page 1125 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 30 of 56 6.1 Contract Period The City anticipates the contract term would begin in April 2026 and extend for a term of 4 years, with an option to extend for two additional one-year terms. 6.2 Professional Services Agreement The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City’s Professional Services Agreement. 6.3 Standards of Work In case of conflicts, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors, or omissions, Consultant shall submit the matter to City for clarification. Any work affected by such conflicts, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors or omissions which is performed by Consultant prior to clarification by City shall be at Consultant's risk and expense. 6.4 Invoicing and Payment Each invoice shall contain a progress report describing the work completed during the billing period and shall also include cost information by task regarding: previous work billed to date, work billed during the reporting period, percent of task completed and amount remaining by task. Invoices are to be submitted monthly. The invoices shall reference the project title, and list charges by task, worker classification, hours, billing rate, and totals. Each invoice shall contain a progress report describing the work completed during the billing period and the following summary information: Contract Amount Total Prior Contract Billings Contract Work Performed this Period Total Contract Amount Performed To Date Contract Percent Complete Total Amount Remaining for the Contract Page 1126 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 31 of 56 7. Attachments and Required Forms 7.1 Sample Professional Services Agreement Page 1127 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 32 of 56 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND [________________] This professional services agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of [________] (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Hermosa Beach (a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254) (“City”) and [_________] (a [________] with its principal place of business at [________]) (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are hereinafter sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. RECITALS A. City is a public agency of the State of California and is in need of Consultant’s [_________] services (“Services”); and B. Consultant is duly licensed and has the necessary qualifications to provide such Services; and C. The Parties desire by this Agreement to establish the terms for City to retain Consultant to provide the Services described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: AGREEMENT 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Services. Consultant shall provide the City with the Services as set forth in in Exhibit A, Services, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of Exhibit A and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. Page 1128 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 33 of 56 3. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel identified in their proposal. Consultant warrants that Consultant is familiar with all laws that may affect its performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect Consultant’s performance of this Agreement. Consultant further represents that no City employee will provide any services under this Agreement. 4. Compensation a. Subject to paragraph 4b below, the City shall pay for the services listed in Exhibit A. b. In no event shall the total amount paid for services rendered by Consultant under this Agreement exceed the sum of [________] dollars ($[_______]). This amount is to cover all related costs for the duration of the term, and the City will not pay any additional fees for printing expenses. Consultant shall submit invoices to City no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the performance of work for which Consultant is billing, invoices shall detail the work performed on each milestone and each project as applicable. All invoices for City’s approved task(s) and or deliverable(s) shall include the following in order for payments to be processed: (1) Consultant’s name, (2) Contract number, (3) Task number, (4) Purchase order number, (5) Project name, (6) Invoice number, (7) Invoice date, (8) Billing period, (9) For work performed on a lump sum basis, the deliverables provided during the billing period or the percentage of each task completed during the billing period, (10) For work performed on a time and materials basis, the name of the staff member working on the task and/or deliverable, the specific task or sub- task performed, the date of performance, the number of hours performed on that date, the staff member’s billing rate per Exhibit B, Cost Proposal, and the description of work performed for that time entry. Any charges for Page 1129 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 34 of 56 approved direct expenditures (e.g., mileage, parking, etc.) shall be accompanied by receipts or other documentation. (11) Total budgeted task amount, (12) Percentage of total task amount billed to date, and (13) Other information as required by a specific task. c. Said invoice shall be based on the total of all Consultant’s services which have been completed to City’s sole satisfaction. City shall pay Consultant’s invoice within forty-five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. The invoice shall describe in detail the services performed, the method of compensation subject to paragraph 4d below, and the associated time for completion. Any additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as “Additional Services” and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where applicable, on all invoices. d. Compensation for services under this Agreement shall be based on one of the following methods of compensation: (1) Lump Sum Method: whereby the Consultant is compensated for meeting designed project milestones for a specific Task. All of the Consultant’s costs, including employee salaries, overhead, other direct costs, subcontract expenses, and profit are included in the Lump Sum amount; (2) Time and Materials Method: whereby the Consultant is compensated based upon the agreed upon rates as stated in Exhibit B, Cost Proposal, and other approved direct costs, subject to Engineer’s approval, with a total not to exceed amount as stated in Exhibit B. Exhibit B shall be in effect for the duration of the Agreement; (3) Combination of Method 1 or 2 above: whereby the Consultant is compensated for some line items in their proposal based upon the Lump Sum Method and other line items in their proposal based on Time and Materials Method. 5. Additional or Removed Work. If changes in the work seem merited by the Parties and informal consultations with the other Party indicate that a change is warranted, it shall be processed by the Consultant forwarding a letter to the City outlining the changes with a statement of estimated changes in fee and/or time schedule. An amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared by the City and executed by both Parties before performance of such services, or the City will not be required to pay for the changes in the scope of work. Such amendment shall not render ineffective or invalidate Page 1130 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 35 of 56 unaffected portions of this Agreement. In the absence of an amendment, the City may order such changes and equitably adjust compensation as necessary. 6. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue until [________], unless the Agreement is previously terminated as provided for herein (“Term”). 7. Maintenance of Records; Audits a. Records of Consultant’s services relating to this Agreement shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be made available to City for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient times for a period of four (4) years from the Effective Date. b. Books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred shall be maintained by Consultant and made available at all reasonable times during the contract period and for four (4) years from the date of final payment under the contract for inspection by City. 8. Time of Performance. Consultant shall perform its services in a prompt and timely manner and shall commence performance upon receipt of written notice from the City to proceed. Consultant shall complete the services required hereunder within Term. 9. Delays in Performance a. Neither Party shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non-performing Party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include a Force Majeure Event. A Force Majeure Event shall mean an event that materially affects the Consultant’s performance and is one or more of the following: (1) Acts of God or other natural disasters occurring at the project site; (2) terrorism or other acts of a public enemy; (3) orders of governmental authorities (including, without limitation, unreasonable and unforeseeable delay in the issuance of permits or approvals by governmental authorities that are required for the services); and (4) pandemics, epidemics, or quarantine restrictions. “Orders of governmental authorities” includes ordinances; emergency proclamations and orders; and rules to protect the public health, welfare, and safety. b. Should a Force Majeure Event occur, the non-performing Party shall (within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing) give written notice to the other Party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance. Delays shall not entitle Consultant to any additional compensation regardless of the Party responsible for the delay. 10. Compliance with Law Page 1131 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 36 of 56 a. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations of the Federal, state, and local government (including California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements). b. Consultant shall assist the City as requested in obtaining and maintaining all permits required of Consultant by Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies. c. If applicable, Consultant is responsible for all costs of clean up and / or removal of hazardous and toxic substances spilled as a result of his or her services or operations performed under this Agreement. 11. Standard of Care. Consultant’s services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles; and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. Consultant’s performance shall conform in all material respects to the requirements of the scope of Services as described in Exhibit A. 12. Conflicts of Interest. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall at all times maintain a duty of loyalty and a fiduciary duty to the City; and shall not accept payment from or employment with any person or entity which will constitute a conflict of interest with the City. 13. Assignment and Subconsultant. Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the City (which may be withheld for any reason). Any attempt to so assign or so transfer without such consent shall be void and without legal effect and shall constitute grounds for termination. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall prevent Consultant from employing independent associates and subconsultants as Consultant may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder. 14. Independent Consultant. Consultant is retained as an independent contractor and is not an employee of City. No employee or agent of Consultant shall become an employee of City. The work to be performed shall be in accordance with the work described in this Agreement, subject to such directions and amendments from City as herein provided. Any personnel performing the work governed by this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such personnel (including but not limited to social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance). Page 1132 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 37 of 56 15. Insurance. Consultant shall not commence work for the City until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. a. Additional Insured. The City (its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers) shall be named as additional insureds on Consultant’s and its subconsultants’ policies of commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance using the endorsements and forms specified herein or exact equivalents. b. Commercial General Liability (i) The Consultant shall take out and maintain (during the performance of all work under this Agreement, in amounts not less than specified herein) Commercial General (“CG”) Liability Insurance in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. (ii) Coverage for CG Liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 00 01) or exact equivalent. (iii) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for the following: (1) Bodily Injury and Property Damage (2) Personal Injury/Advertising Injury (3) Premises/Operations Liability (4) Products/Completed Operations Liability (5) Aggregate Limits that Apply per Project (6) Explosion, Collapse, and Underground (UCX) exclusion deleted (7) Contractual Liability with respect to this Agreement (8) Property Damage (9) Independent Consultants Coverage (iv) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; (3) products/completed operations liability; or (4) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement. (v) The policy shall give City (its elected and appointed Page 1133 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 38 of 56 officials, officers, employees, agents, and City-designated volunteers) additional insured status using ISO endorsement forms CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (vi) The general liability program may utilize either deductibles or provide coverage excess of a self-insured retention, subject to written approval by the City; and provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured. c. Automobile Liability (i) At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain Automobile Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage (including coverage for owned, non-owned, and hired vehicles in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City). (ii) Coverage for automobile liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 00 01 covering automobile liability (Coverage Symbol 1, any auto). (iii) The policy shall give City (its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and City-designated volunteers) additional insured status. (iv) Subject to written approval by the City, the automobile liability program may utilize deductibles; provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured, but not a self-insured retention. d. Workers’ Compensation/Employer’s Liability (i) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code; and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. (ii) To the extent Consultant has employees at any time during the term of this Agreement (at all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement), the Consultant shall maintain full compensation insurance for all persons employed directly by him/her to carry out the work contemplated under this Agreement (all in accordance with the “Workers’ Compensation and Insurance Act”, Division IV of the Labor Code of the State of California and any acts amendatory thereof, and Employer’s Liability Coverage in amounts indicated herein). Consultant shall require all subconsultants to obtain and maintain (for the period required by this Agreement) workers’ compensation coverage of the same type and limits as specified in this section. e. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions). At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain Page 1134 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 39 of 56 professional liability or Errors and Omissions insurance appropriate to its profession in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City and in an amount indicated herein. This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors, or omissions of the Consultant. “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. f. Privacy/Network Security (Cyber). At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain privacy/network security insurance for: (1) privacy breaches; (2) system breaches; (3) denial or loss of service; and (4) the introduction, implantation, or spread of malicious software code in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. g. Minimum Policy Limits Required (i) The following insurance limits are required: Combined Single Limit Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 per occurrence/$4,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence Professional Liability $1,000,000 per claim and aggregate (errors and omissions) Cyber Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence and aggregate (ii) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits. (iii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement; or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Any available coverage shall be provided to the Parties required to be named as Additional Insured pursuant to this Agreement. Page 1135 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 40 of 56 h. Evidence Required. Prior to execution of the Agreement, the Consultant shall file with the City evidence of insurance from an insurer or insurers certifying to the coverage of all insurance required herein. Such evidence shall include original copies of the ISO CG 00 01 (or insurer’s equivalent) signed by the insurer’s representative and Certificate of Insurance (Acord Form 25-S or equivalent), together with required endorsements. All evidence of insurance shall be signed by a properly authorized officer, agent, or qualified representative of the insurer and shall certify the names of the insured, any additional insureds (where appropriate) the type and amount of the insurance, the location and operations to which the insurance applies, and the expiration date of such insurance. i. Policy Provisions Required (i) Consultant shall provide the City at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement; except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of the premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the City at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (ii) The Commercial General Liability Policy and Automobile Policy shall each contain a provision stating that Consultant’s policy is primary insurance and that any insurance, self-insurance, or other coverage maintained by the City or any named insureds shall not be called upon to contribute to any loss. (iii) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three (3) years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period (a) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; (b) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or (c) if the policy is replaced by another claims-made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. (iv) All required insurance coverages (except for the professional liability coverage) shall contain or be endorsed to provide waiver of subrogation in favor of the City (its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers) or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City; Page 1136 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 41 of 56 and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants. (v) The limits set forth herein shall apply separately to each insured against whom claims are made or suits are brought, except with respect to the limits of liability. Further the limits set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification obligations to the City and shall not preclude the City from taking such other actions available to the City under other provisions of the Agreement or law. j. Qualifying Insurers. All policies required shall be issued by acceptable insurance companies (as determined by the City) which satisfy the following minimum requirements: Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and admitted to transact in the business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any Federal law. k. Additional Insurance Provisions (i) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant; and any approval of said insurance by the City is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement (including but not limited to the provisions concerning indemnification). (ii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, the City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement. (iii) The City may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (iv) The City (City Council, any member of the City Council, officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers) shall not be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. l. Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any Page 1137 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 42 of 56 subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the City that they have secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the City as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, the City may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 16. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel reasonably approved by the City), indemnify, and hold the City (its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and authorized volunteers) free and harmless from any and all claims (demands, causes of action, suits, actions, proceedings, costs, expenses, liability, judgments, awards, decrees, settlements, loss, damage or injury of any kind in law or equity to property or persons including wrongful death (“Claims”)) in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts (errors, omissions, or willful misconduct) of Consultant (its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents) in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s services, the Project, or this Agreement (including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees, attorneys’ fees, and other related costs and expenses). This indemnification clause excludes Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City (the City Council, members of the City Council, its employees, or authorized volunteers). Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. 17. California Labor Code Requirements a. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq. (as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq.) ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws if applicable. Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City (its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents) free and harmless from any claims (liabilities, costs, penalties, or interest) arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and all subcontractors to comply with all California Labor Code provisions which include but are not limited to prevailing wages (Labor Code Sections 1771, 1774 and 1775), employment of apprentices (Labor Code Section 1777.5), certified payroll records (Labor Code Sections 1771.4 and 1776), hours of labor (Labor Code Sections 1813 and 1815), and debarment of contractors and subcontractors (Labor Code Section 1777.1). The requirement to submit certified payroll Page 1138 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 43 of 56 records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Section 1771.4. b. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants performing such Services must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants, as applicable. This Project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1. 18. Verification of Employment Eligibility. By executing this Agreement, Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and Federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens (including but not limited to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as may be amended from time to time), and shall require all subconsultants and sub- subconsultants to comply with the same. 19. Laws and Venue. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or Federal court situated in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. 20. Termination or Abandonment a. The City has the right to terminate or abandon any portion or all of the work under this Agreement by giving ten (10) calendar days’ written notice to Consultant. In such event, City shall be immediately given title and possession to all original field notes, drawings and specifications, written reports, and other documents produced or developed for that portion of the work completed and/or being abandoned. The City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered for any portion of the work completed prior to termination. If said termination occurs prior to completion of any task for the Project for which a payment request has not been received, the charge for services performed during such task shall be the reasonable value of such services (based on an amount mutually agreed to by the Parties of the portion of such task completed but not paid prior to said termination). The City shall not be liable for any costs other than the charges or portions thereof which are specified herein. Consultant shall not be entitled to payment for unperformed services, and shall not be entitled to damages or compensation for termination of work. Page 1139 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 44 of 56 b. Consultant may terminate its obligation to provide further services under this Agreement upon thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice to City only in the event of substantial failure by City to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of Consultant. c. If the Agreement is terminated prior to its completion for any reason, Consultant shall refund the monthly prorated cost of the incomplete term. 21. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Consultant (when requested) shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City’s representative, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to Consultant’s professional services occurs, Consultant shall (at no cost to City) provide all other services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of the City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. 22. Prohibited Employment. Consultant shall not employ any current employee of City to perform the work under this Agreement while this Agreement is in effect. 23. Costs. Each Party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement; and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as expressly provided herein. 24. Ownership of Documents and Confidential Information a. All deliverables and other documents generated by Consultant in the performance of the Services (including all work papers, work-in-progress, designs, drawings, documents, data, computations, specifications, studies and reports prepared by Consultant as a part of the Services or authorized Additional Services (“Consultant Work Product”)) shall belong to and be subject to the sole ownership and use of City. b. Consultant may receive written or verbal information from City (its representatives or agents) not in the public domain during the course of the performance of this Agreement. Such information may include City’s know how, trade secrets, and other proprietary and confidential information; and Consultant agrees to treat such information as confidential information belonging to City. Consultant agrees that neither it (nor its officers, employees, representatives, agents, successors, or assigns) will disclose such information to any third party or use the same in any manner without the prior written consent of City. Consultant further agrees to safeguard such proprietary and confidential information from unauthorized disclosure and/or use using the same degree of care it uses to protect its own proprietary and confidential information, but not less than a reasonable standard of care. In the event that disclosure of such information is sought pursuant to any law or regulation, Consultant shall promptly notify City of such fact to allow City to assert whatever exclusions or exemptions may be available to it under Page 1140 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 45 of 56 applicable law or regulation. 25. Organization. Consultant shall assign [______] as Project Manager. Consultant shall provide City fifteen (15) days written notice before removing or reassigning the Project Manager from the performance of the Services. 26. Limitation of Agreement. This Agreement is limited to and includes only the work included in the scope of Services described in Exhibit A. 27. Notice. Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered by this Agreement may be given or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office (certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and addressed to the following addresses) and shall be effective upon receipt thereof: CITY: City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Attn: [______] CONSULTANT: [Name] [Address] [Address] Attn: [_______] 28. Third Party Rights. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the City and the Consultant. 29. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non- discrimination shall include but not be limited to all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination. 30. City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves its right to employ other consultants, including engineers, in connection with the scope of Services as listed in Exhibit A or other scopes of Services. 31. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors in interest, executors, administrators, and assigns of Page 1141 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 46 of 56 each Party to this Agreement. However, Consultant shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties, or obligations without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment without such consent shall be invalid and void. 32. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has neither employed nor retained any company or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant) to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant) any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. No official, officer, or employee of City (during the term of his or her service with City) shall have any direct interest in this Agreement; or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom for the term of this Agreement. 33. Non-Waiver. The delay or failure of either Party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other Party of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the Party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy with respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy with respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. 34. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable for any reason, such determination shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the offending provision in any other circumstance; and the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 35. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 36. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain, or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof; and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 37. Amendments. Only a writing executed by all of the Parties hereto or their respective successors and assigns may amend this Agreement. 38. Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said Page 1142 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 47 of 56 Parties; and that by doing so, the Parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. 39. Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including the Exhibits) represents the entire understanding of the Parties as to those matters contained herein; and supersedes and cancels any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understanding, promises, or representations with respect to those matters covered hereunder. Each Party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by any person which are not incorporated herein, and that any other agreements shall be void. This is an integrated Agreement. 40. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one single Agreement. 41. Electronic Signature. Each Party acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement may be executed by electronic or digital signature, which shall be considered as an original signature for all purposes and shall have the same force and effect as an original signature. 42. Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to the City that certain additional key personnel and consultants will perform the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel or consultants become unavailable, Consultant may substitute others of at least equal competence upon written approval of the City. In the event the Parties cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, engineers, or consultants, the City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. Any personnel, engineers, or consultants who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City (or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Services, or a threat to the safety of persons or property) shall be promptly removed from the Services by the Consultant at the request of the City. The key additional personnel, engineers, and consultants for performance of this Agreement are as follows: [INSERT NAMES, AND TITLES OF KEY PERSONNEL, AND LICENSE NUMBERS, IF APPLICABLE]. 43. Licenses and Permits. Consultant shall obtain all licenses and permits necessary for the performance of the Services at no cost to the City, except with respect to the following licenses and permits if so identified which the City shall obtain at its own cost: None. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] Page 1143 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 48 of 56 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND [___________] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVED BY: Steve Napolitano City Manager ATTESTED BY: Reanna Guzman Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jason Baltimore Interim City Attorney [___________] Taxpayer Identified Number: Page 1144 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 49 of 56 EXHIBIT A SERVICES Page 1145 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 50 of 56 EXHIBIT B COST PROPOSAL Page 1146 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 51 of 56 Page 1147 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 52 of 56 7.2 Required Forms 7.2.1 Certification of Proposal RFP #: _________ The undersigned hereby submits its proposal and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal (RFP). 1. Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Proposal, Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. 2. By submitting the response to this request, Proposer agrees, if selected to furnish services to the City in accordance with this RFP. 3. Proposer has carefully reviewed its proposal and understands and agrees that the City is not responsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the Proposer and that the Proposer is responsible for them. 4. It is understood and agreed that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals and to waive any informality or irregularity in any proposal received by the City. 5. The proposal response includes all of the commentary, figures and data required by the Request for Proposal 6. The proposal shall be valid for 90 days from the date of submittal. 7. Proposer acknowledges that the City may issue addendums related to this RFP and that the proposer has reviewed the following addendums which have been issued: Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ 8. Proposer further acknowledges the provisions of any addendums issued have been incorporated into their proposal. Page 1148 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 53 of 56 Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page 1149 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 54 of 56 7.2.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit RFP #: _________ The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1. This proposal is not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation. 2. This proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham. 3. I have not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Proposer to put in a false or sham proposal and I have not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any other Proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal or to refrain from submitting to this RFP. 4. I have not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price or to fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the proposal price or to secure any advantage against the City of Hermosa Beach or of anyone interested in the proposed contract. 5. All statements contained in the Proposal and related documents are true. 6. I have not directly or indirectly submitted the proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any person, corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, RFP depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. 7. I have not entered into any arrangement or agreement with any City of Hermosa Beach public officer in connection with this proposal. 8. I understand collusive bidding is a violation of State and Federal law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page 1150 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 55 of 56 7.2.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements RFP #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with the City s insurance requirements contained within this RFP. The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1. Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the insurance requirements as specified in the Request for Proposal. 2. If selected, proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page 1151 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 56 of 56 7.2.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement RFP #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City s Professional Services Agreement. Proposers should identify and/or indicate any exceptions to the Sample Professional Services Agreement included in Section 6.2. The City Attorney or their designee retains the discretion to accept or reject proposed exceptions or modifications to the City s Professional Services Agreement. 1. Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the conditions specified in the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement. 2. Proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein with exceptions noted as follows: ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Page 1152 of 1339 PROPOSALCITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Department of Public Works 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL ACT PROJECT ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY YARD REPLACEMENT PROJECT Revised May 13, 2026Page 1153 of 1339 www.rouxinc.com i Contents 1 Cover Letter ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Firm Profile ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 3 Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work ........................................................................................ 5 4 Project Management Plan .................................................................................................................................... 13 5 Experience and Qualifications .............................................................................................................................. 15 6 Required Forms.................................................................................................................................................... 20 7 Cost Proposal ....................................................................................................................................................... 20 Figures Figure 1: Proposed Organization Chart for City of Hermosa Beach RFP 26-003 City Yard Replacement Project ................. 18 Appendices A. Site Plan B. Resumes C. Required Forms Page 1154 of 1339 www.rouxinc.com 1 1 Cover Letter April 27, 2026 Joe SanClemente Public Works Director City Of Hermosa Beach Public Works Department 1315 Valley Drive, Suite 100 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Re: RFP# 26-003 California Environmental Quality Control Act (CEQA) Project Analysis and Other Environmental Services for the City Yard Replacement Project Dear Mr. SanClemente, Roux Associates, Inc. (“Roux”) is pleased to submit this revised proposal to provide CEQA project analysis and related environmental consulting services for the City of Hermosa Beach (the “City”) City Yard Replacement Project, in response to RFP 26-003. Roux appreciates the opportunity to support the City on this important municipal project. Roux Associates, Inc. is a nationally recognized environmental consulting firm specializing in CEQA and NEPA compliance, environmental investigation and remediation, risk assessment, and regulatory support for public-sector and infrastructure projects. Roux maintains a strong presence in Southern California, providing responsive local support, backed by the resources of a nationwide firm. Primary Contact: Ms. Nancy Anglin, PE Principal Engineer | Southern California Operations Manager Phone: 949.795.6830 Email: nanglin@rouxinc.com Summary of Professional Qualifications Roux brings decades of experience supporting California municipalities and public agencies on complex redevelopment and infrastructure projects involving legacy environmental conditions, Brownfield sites, and sensitive public review processes. Our professionals have prepared and supported legally defensible CEQA documents, coordinated extensively with local and state regulatory agencies, and guided projects through public review, hearings, and construction readiness. Roux’s multidisciplinary team—comprising environmental engineers, CEQA practitioners, risk assessors, and field specialists—is well-qualified to address the technical, regulatory, and schedule challenges associated with the City Yard Replacement Project. Statement of Understanding of the Scope of Work Roux understands that the City Yard Replacement Project requires a comprehensive and defensible CEQA analysis integrated with environmental investigation, remediation planning, regulatory coordination, and public engagement. The project involves redevelopment of a municipal facility with known or potential environmental constraints, requiring careful management of legacy conditions, coordination with multiple agencies, and support through public hearings and City decision-making. Roux’s proposed scope addresses preparation of CEQA documentation, technical environmental support, coordination with the City and regulators, and assistance through public review and approval, consistent with the requirements of RFP 26-003. Roux Associates, Inc. 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway Suite 450 Long Beach, CA 90804 Page 1155 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 2 Why Roux? Roux offers the City a risk-focused, integrated approach that goes beyond basic CEQA compliance. Our team is structured to help the City reduce legal, technical, and schedule risk by aligning CEQA documentation with remediation planning, regulatory expectations, and constructability considerations from the outset. Roux emphasizes early issue identification, clear and transparent documentation, respect for prior work, and proactive communication with City staff and stakeholders. This approach is designed to protect the City’s interests, support informed decision-making, and advance the project efficiently toward implementation. Acknowledgement of Addenda Roux hereby acknowledges receipt and review of Addendum No. 1, issued on March 5, 2026; the interview on April 7, 2026; and a virtual meeting on April 23, 2026; for RFP 26-003. All information contained therein has been considered in the preparation of this proposal. Roux appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal and looks forward to the possibility of working with the City of Hermosa Beach on the City Yard Replacement Project. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Nancy Anglin, PE, ENV SP Jay M. Shipley, PE Principal Engineer/Operations Manager National Director of Public Sector Services (949) 795-6830 (562) 275-9774 nanglin@rouxinc.com jshipley@rouxinc.com Page 1156 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 3 2 Firm Profile Since 1981, Roux Associates, Inc. (Roux) has been at the forefront of environmental and engineering consulting, tackling some of the most complex environmental challenges with innovation and dedication. As a privately held, employee-owned firm, we pride ourselves on our safety-minded and passionate team, which is committed to delivering exceptional solutions for our clients. With nearly 450 talented professionals, our corporate headquarters in New York, and another 14 regional offices spread across the United States, we are well-equipped to serve a diverse range of industries. Our expertise spans assessment, remediation, and compliance services, and our track record of outstanding performance speaks for itself. At Roux, we don't just meet expectations, we exceed them. Roux provides a broad range of technical, consultation, regulatory, and field services related to site assessment and remediation throughout California, and the greater United States. Our team has extensive experience working with a number of federal, state and local regulatory agencies including the Alameda County Environmental Health Department (ACEHD), the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to not only identify and address vapor intrusion issues, but also a wide variety of complex environmental challenges. Official Name and Address: Roux Associates, Inc. 209 Shafter Street Islandia, New York 11749 Telephone: (631) 232-2600, Point of Contact: Nancy Anglin, PE 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 450 Long Beach, CA 90804 nanglin@rouxinc.com (949) 795-6830 Type of business entity: Type C Corporation Federal Employer I.D. Number: 11-2479482 Firm Locations – Southern California: Long Beach, California 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 450 Long Beach, CA 90804 Telephone: (310) 879 4900 Burbank, California 100 North First Street, Suite 403 Burbank, CA 91502 Telephone: (310) 879-4900 Ownership Structure: Privately held affiliate company - Roux Environmental Engineering and Geology, D.P.C. - related company through common ownership. Years in Business and Relevant Experience: Roux has nearly 45 years of experience delivering the required, equivalent, and related environmental services for public agencies and private clients nationwide. The firm’s experience includes work at complex industrial facilities, brownfield and redevelopment sites, Superfund and large-scale remediation projects, transportation and infrastructure projects, and high-profile litigation and insurance matters. Contract Performance History: Roux has not been terminated for cause nor has it failed or refused to complete a contract for professional services. Where project scopes or schedules have changed, Roux has worked collaboratively with clients to modify contract terms or deliverables consistent with applicable procurement requirements and professional standards. Roux does not have any exceptions to the contract. Founding Year 1981 Fulltime Employees 450 Office Locations (15) California: Long Beach, Burbank, Oakland New York: Long Island (Islandia headquarters), New York City, Buffalo, Rochester Massachusetts: Burlington New Jersey: Logan Township, Somerset Texas: Houston, Corpus Christi Illinois: Chicago, Oak Brook Virginia: Arlington Page 1157 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 4 We provide a unique set of qualities that distinguish us from our competitors: Client Advocacy and Regulatory Expertise Roux is proud of our reputation as a trusted advisor to our clients with deep regulatory fluency. We interpret complex environmental challenges into pragmatic solutions with the goal of protecting our clients from unnecessary costs and liability. Integrated, Outcome-Focused Solutions We articulate a clear framework for delivering client outcomes. These include:  Understanding both stated and unstated client needs.  Offering differentiated technical solutions that outperform competitors.  Demonstrating proof of delivery through past performance and measurable results Local Expertise with National Reach Roux’s Long Beach office is located less than 20 miles from the site and staffed with 40 full-time professionals. This proximity ensures timely response and a deep familiarity with local environmental conditions, while the number and technical diversity of our local professional staff. Health and Safety Commitment Roux delivers high-quality environmental consulting with an unwavering commitment to safety, reliability, and environmental stewardship. Our comprehensive health and safety program—covering compliance, training, audits, and employee engagement—ensures excellence across all operations. With a 2024-2025 experience modification rate (EMR) of 0.79, well below the industry average, our goal is simple and absolute: Nobody Gets Hurt. Page 1158 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 5 3 Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work Statement of Project Understanding The City of Hermosa Beach City Yard Replacement Project is a technically complex, highly scrutinized public project that requires the seamless integration of CEQA compliance, legacy site remediation, regulatory coordination, and public transparency. The City is not simply seeking preparation of an environmental document; it is seeking a trusted technical partner capable of delivering a legally defensible CEQA (and potential CEQA/NEPA) analysis while advancing the project efficiently toward remediation, construction, and regulatory closure. The Project site at 555 6th Street has a long operational history as a municipal maintenance yard, including former landfill use, underground storage tanks, petroleum-impacted soils, metals, soil vapor concerns, and groundwater impacts. The City has prudently invested in extensive environmental investigations, risk assessments, and corrective action planning over several decades. These studies provide a robust technical foundation, but also identify specific data gaps, regulatory updates, and implementation needs that must now be addressed to support redevelopment. In addition, the City is evaluating the demolition of the Hermosa Beach Self Storage facility at 552 11th Place (for temporary relocation of the City’s maintenance yard) as well as potential consolidation of additional municipal functions (including engineering offices), which introduces flexibility, but also uncertainty, into project definition. Funding considerations may further require compliance with both CEQA and NEPA, increasing the importance of a scalable and coordinated environmental documentation strategy. Our team understands that the City’s primary objectives are to:  Achieve defensible CEQA compliance that withstands public and legal scrutiny  Avoid unnecessary duplication of prior environmental work  Update hazardous materials and remediation documentation to meet current regulatory standards  Maintain schedule and cost control while reducing regulatory risk  Communicate clearly and transparently with the public and decision-makers  Advance the site toward No Further Action (NFA) or equivalent regulatory closure In summary, Roux understands the City’s objectives to complete a legally defensible, efficient CEQA process that supports implementation of the City Yard Replacement Project while appropriately addressing the site’s environmental history. Roux is prepared to apply its CEQA, regulatory, and technical expertise to deliver high-quality environmental documentation that meets the City’s objectives. Approach to Work Program A. Technical Studies Our trusted team member, Michael Baker, will coordinate with City staff to initiate CEQA, confirm the project description/analysis parameters, and complete the technical studies needed to support CEQA documentation. This includes an in-person kickoff meeting and a brief meeting summary (agenda, minutes, and action items). A detailed description of each task is presented in Michael Baker’s cost proposal included in the separately attached cost proposal. Michael Baker will compile and review available planning/policy and environmental information and complete one site visit with photo documentation. Michael Baker will prepare a draft project description for City review, including key exhibits (regional map, vicinity map, and conceptual site plan). The following Technical Studies will be prepared:  Transportation (VMT Screening Memo): Prepare a VMT screening memo with project-specific trip generation (daily and AM/PM peak hour), including credit for existing on-site uses as appropriate; full VMT analysis is not included. Two submittals (draft and final) are included.  Air Quality: Prepare CEQA air quality analysis/modeling consistent with SCAQMD guidance using CalEEMod (v2022.1), including localized impacts (LST methodology) and health risk analysis; address AQMP consistency and naturally occurring asbestos qualitatively.  Greenhouse Gas (GHG): Prepare construction and operational GHG emissions inventory (CalEEMod), incorporate applicable program reductions, and evaluate consistency with SCAG 2024–2050 RTP/SCS, CARB 2022 Scoping Plan, and PLAN Hermosa climate policies.  Energy: Prepare CEQA energy analysis (PRC 21100(b)(3); CEQA Guidelines Appendix G/F), including Page 1159 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 6 construction/operational energy estimates (CalEEMod) and consistency with applicable energy plans.  Noise and Vibration: Conduct baseline noise monitoring (up to four locations; ~10 minutes each) and model construction noise/vibration (FTA guidance) and operational noise at sensitive receptors.  Cultural and Paleontological Resources: Prepare a Cultural and Paleontological Resources Memo (records/locality searches, literature review, sensitivity assessment, built-environment survey, and DPR 523 forms, as applicable).  AB 52 Tribal Consultation Assistance: Prepare and send AB 52 consultation invitation letters (on behalf of the City) and maintain a mailing log. B. Draft & Final CEQA Documents Based on the technical analyses (Item A) and in coordination with City staff, Michael Baker will prepare a project-specific IS/MND. An EIR is not anticipated and is excluded from this scope; if an EIR is later determined necessary, it will be provided under a separate scope and fee. The IS/MND will be prepared in a City-ready format and will include, as applicable:  Introduction, project description, and Initial Study checklist/impact determinations  Environmental analysis and mitigation measures (as needed), supported by Task 2 technical studies  Mandatory findings of significance and determination page  Up to six graphic exhibits Drafting and submittals. Michael Baker will prepare the IS/MND through the following stages: (1) Administrative Draft; (2) Screencheck Draft (incorporating one consolidated set of City comments); (3) Public Review Draft (final City edits incorporated); and (4) Final IS/MND (Public Review Draft plus responses to comments/errata and the MMRP). Responses to comments and errata. Michael Baker will prepare draft and final responses to comments received during the 30-day public review period, incorporating one consolidated set of City comments per draft. The level of public/agency comment is unknown; this scope includes up to 40 hours to respond to comments. If additional technical analysis or expanded response effort is needed, Michael Baker will advise the City and request additional funding. If necessary, an errata will be prepared with revisions shown in strikethrough and double underline. CEQA notices and filings. Michael Baker will prepare required notices for City review and distribute via certified mail to a City-approved distribution list, and will complete the following filings/submittals:  Prepare and file the Notice of Availability/Notice of Intent (NOA/NOI) to initiate the 30-day public review period.  Prepare the Notice of Completion (NOC) and State Clearinghouse Summary Form and submit required materials to the State Clearinghouse via CEQASubmit (including ADA-compliant uploads).  Post the NOA/NOI at the County Clerk-Recorder Office.  Prepare and file the Notice of Determination (NOD) within five days of Final IS/MND adoption (includes payment of CDFW filing fees; assumes 2026 fee schedule applies).  City responsibility: any radius mailing and/or newspaper notices required for the project. C. Optional – Combined CEQA/NEPA Upon notification of federal funding, Michael Baker will meet virtually with City staff to confirm the appropriate level of NEPA documentation/clearance. The Initial Study prepared under Item B will be used to support NEPA clearance. This task assumes the project will qualify for a Categorical Exclusion (CE); additional NEPA-level analysis beyond the Item A technical studies, if required by the Federal lead agency, would be provided under a separate scope and fee. D. Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program (MMRP) Michael Baker will prepare an MMRP to track implementation of mitigation measures and conditions of approval identified in the Initial Study during project implementation. The MMRP checklist will summarize, as applicable:  Mitigation measure number and topic area  Mitigation/condition language (chronological order)  Monitoring milestone and responsible party  Verification method and sign-off (initials/date) with remarks E. Public Outreach Ms. Bogue of Michael Baker will represent the Project Team at up to three in-person public hearings (e.g., Planning Commission and City Council). Attendance at a public scoping meeting is excluded because preparation of an EIR is not included in this scope. Any additional public outreach meetings or hearings would be provided under a separate scope on a time-and-materials basis. Page 1160 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 7 F. Project Management Roux and Michael Baker will provide proactive project management throughout the duration of the City Yard Replacement Project. Roux will attend meetings with City staff, the applicant team, regulatory agencies, stakeholders, and members of the public, as requested by the City. Project management will focus on maintaining clear communication, aligning technical work with City goals and CEQA milestones, and identifying potential issues early to avoid delays. Roux will designate a single point of contact responsible for coordination, scheduling, and responsiveness to City direction. G. Hazardous Materials Studies Roux understands that the site has been subject to extensive prior environmental investigation and remediation, and that the City requires targeted updates to reflect current regulatory standards and screening criteria. i. Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) and Supplementary Site Investigations (SSIs): Roux will review existing Phase II ESAs and SSI data completed in 2012 (Brycon) and 2018 (Dudek) and will prepare an updated Phase II ESA and/or SSI as needed to address changes in regulations, guidance, or screening levels. We understand from the documents reviewed that two USTs were abandoned in place, and are in the western portion of the site, beneath the older site building. The evaluation will focus on data gaps relevant to the proposed grading and redevelopment footprint and will be scaled appropriately to CEQA and remedial decision-making needs. ii. Hazardous Materials Surveys: Roux’s trusted team member Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (TES) will perform updated hazardous building materials surveys to support demolition and redevelopment activities under Roux’s overall project management and coordination. The scope includes a supplemental asbestos and lead-containing materials survey at the City Yard facility at 555 6th Street to address data gaps in prior hazardous building materials surveys, and a full asbestos and lead-containing materials demolition survey for the structures located at 552 11th Place (Hermosa Beach Self Storage). Surveys will be limited to accessible and observable building materials anticipated to be impacted by demolition or renovation and will consist of visual inspection and representative sampling of suspect asbestos‑containing materials (ACM/ACCM) and lead‑containing materials (LBP/LCM). The Titan team will collect up to 265 bulk asbestos samples for analysis by polarized light microscopy (PLM) and up to four lead bulk samples for waste profiling analyses, including Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC), Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration using the Waste Extraction Test (STLC/WET), and Total Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP), as applicable. Representative paint chip sampling and field screening will be performed where appropriate to support regulatory compliance and demolition planning. Sampling, analytical testing, and documentation will be completed in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local requirements. The results of the surveys will be summarized in updated asbestos and lead survey reports suitable to support regulatory compliance, abatement planning, waste characterization, and demolition sequencing. Activities beyond the defined scope or sample counts will be performed only upon additional authorization. iii. Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA): Roux will perform an HHRA to estimate baseline risk to current and future receptors at the City Maintenance Yard in the absence of future remedial actions (e.g., excavation, capping, etc.). The HHRA will follow DTSC and United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) protocols and will achieve quality appropriate for California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) review. The HHRA will evaluate exposure to indoor air (via modeling other media to estimate potential vapor intrusion to indoor air), and exposure to soil. Key elements of the HHRA approach include: using default attenuation factors to model indoor-air exposure point concentrations from soil vapor and/or groundwater, incorporating site-specific lines of evidence as available; and using existing investigation data and Roux data to develop exposure point concentrations for media of concern. 1. Evaluate arsenic relative to Southern California ambient concentrations, consistent with DTSC/Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) HHRA Note Number 11. 2. Consistent with planning institutional controls (e.g., capping), evaluating commercial/industrial and construction worker receptors; residential use will not be evaluated. 3. Estimate cumulative risk across applicable media for each receptor. Report cancer risk as excess incremental lifetime cancer risk, and non-cancer risk as hazards index. Compare results to applicable target risk and hazard thresholds. Page 1161 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 8 For lead, apply DTSC’s LeadSpread model. HHRA results will be provided in a standalone report. iv. Corrective Action Plan (CAP): Roux will prepare an updated CAP, as needed, to reflect updated regulatory requirements or screening levels since the 2019 Dudek CAP. The updated CAP will also incorporate the comments presented in the SMU approval letter dated January 3, 2020 including an evaluation of SCAQMD Rules 1166 and 1466, which were not addressed in prior reports, and will assess their applicability to the site and proposed remedial approach. The updated CAP may also address the need for vapor intrusion mitigation design for the proposed structures, vent cone design for the oil well, post-construction indoor air sampling, etc. This analysis will be coordinated with the City and relevant regulatory agencies to ensure that the CAP is technically accurate, implementable, and aligned with both CEQA documentation and air quality regulatory expectations. H. Health and Safety Plan (HASP) Roux will prepare a site-specific HASP in compliance with California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 5192 (HAZWOPER). The HASP will address work procedures and personal protective equipment necessary to protect future construction workers during CAP field activities, as well as measures to protect offsite sensitive receptors. The HASP will be tailored to anticipated site conditions and remedial activities. I. Workplan Addendum to the CAP Roux will prepare a Workplan Addendum to the CAP per the SMU request proposing additional surficial soil sampling in future grading areas where soils have not been previously assessed, including beneath existing structures to be demolished. Sampling locations will be distributed to achieve adequate coverage consistent with an approximate 50-foot by 50-foot grid as shown on the Site Plan in Appendix A. Samples will be analyzed for metals, pH, and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), with additional analyses for semi-volatile organic compounds (including PAHs) and PCBs if TPH is detected. (This Workplan will be updated if an alternative corrective action approach is selected). This Workplan will also include the proposed groundwater well installation and sampling, soil vapor sampling, and other data gaps that may come out of the ESA and SSI update. Potential data gaps cannot be fully known until the ESA and SSI documents are reviewed and the report updated. Our estimate may be updated based on the results of that review. Note: We have included costs for the 50-foot x 50-foot grid sampling and reporting as well as the sampling described by Section 7.3 of the Corrective Action Plan (seven locations extended to 3.5 feet below ground surface) under this scope item in the separately provided cost proposal. J. Groundwater Monitoring Roux will provide groundwater monitoring services, including installation, development, and surveying of up to three perimeter monitoring wells to evaluate contaminant concentrations and groundwater flow direction and gradient. Roux will conduct up to four quarterly or semi-annual sampling events and will prepare the associated monitoring reports. Monitoring will be designed to support remedial evaluation and regulatory coordination. Proposed well locations are shown on the Site Plan in Appendix A K. Soil Management Plan (SMP) Roux will prepare a SMP describing procedures to be implemented if previously unidentified contamination or subsurface structures (e.g., drums, underground storage tanks [USTs], septic systems) are encountered during construction. The SMP will define response actions, handling procedures, documentation requirements, and regulatory notification protocols. L. Soil Vapor Surveying Roux will conduct a post-grading soil vapor survey and methane survey beneath proposed future buildings and in the vicinity of the landfill area where elevated PCE concentrations were previously detected. Sampling will include up to 10 dual-nested soil vapor probes installed at depths of approximately 5 feet and 15 feet below ground surface as shown on the Site Plan in Appendix A. Soil vapor samples will be collected and analyzed for VOCs and methane. The soil vapor survey will not include testing of soil samples unless field screening indicates the presence of contamination. Results of testing will be evaluated relative to applicable screening levels and incorporated into remedial and CEQA documentation. M. Services Leading to a No Further Action Letter (NFA) Roux will provide regulatory coordination, engagement, and necessary support services to advance the project toward environmental closure (or equivalent) in compliance with applicable Local, State, and Federal requirements. Based on the site history, contaminants of concern, and anticipated corrective action framework, Roux recommends the following regulatory oversight structure: 1. Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD) Site Mitigation Unit (SMU): is the ideal lead regulatory agency because the operate quickly and accept reasonable solutions. Although they are not currently taking on new cases, this site is already an open case Page 1162 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 9 with SMU which is advantageous to the City. Therefore, SMU is the anticipated lead agency for oversight of soil vapor, soil, and groundwater remediation, corrective action approval, and issuance of a land use covenant (LUC), a NFA, or equivalent closure determination. 2. California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC): next choice for engagement to be evaluated if site conditions or selected remedies trigger DTSC jurisdiction. 3. Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB): third choice for engagement to be evaluated if site conditions or selected remedies trigger RWQCB jurisdiction. 4. SCAQMD: oversight of air quality-related requirements associated with excavation, remediation, and implementation of applicable SCAQMD rules. 5. California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM): regulates all oil and gas wells in California, including active, idle, abandoned, and orphan wells. Roux will interface with the appropriate oversight agency or agencies to confirm regulatory pathways, reporting requirements, and closure criteria applicable to the site. Roux will prepare and submit Closure Reports and supporting documentation required to obtain an NFA or equivalent regulatory determination, consistent with the continued commercial/industrial land use of the site. Development of sites containing abandoned oil wells is subject to review by the CalGEM to confirm that wells have been properly plugged and abandoned in accordance with applicable State standards. Structures are generally not permitted directly over oil wells unless CalGEM determines that the well poses no risk to public health, safety, or the environment, and re-abandonment may be required prior to construction. Roux will support the City by coordinating directly with CalGEM, reviewing available well records, and facilitating agency consultation as needed to confirm well status and address any CalGEM requirements applicable to the Project. Roux understands that, depending on the remediation method selected and residual site conditions, a formal NFA determination may not be achievable for all media. In such cases, Roux will assist the City with preparation and recordation of required environmental notifications or land-use restrictions, including deed restrictions or environmental covenants, through the Los Angeles County Recorder. These documents will identify residual contaminant conditions, required mitigation measures (such as engineered caps), and applicable land-use limitations, as required by the overseeing regulatory agency. Throughout this process, Roux will coordinate closely with City staff to ensure that regulatory closure strategies are clear, implementable, and fully consistent with CEQA documentation and long-term site management objectives. N. Optional – Monitoring During Construction If requested, Roux will provide comprehensive environmental monitoring services during demolition and construction activities in compliance with the MMRP, the approved SMP, applicable HASPs, and SCAQMD Rules 1150, 1166, 1403, and 1466. Monitoring services described under this optional task are subject to Task N assumptions and are not included unless specifically authorized and budgeted. Monitoring services may include hazardous building materials abatement monitoring during building demolition, as well as earthmoving monitoring during grading and construction. The structure demolition-phase monitoring may be conducted in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1403, including verification of asbestos survey completion, notification requirements, implementation of required emission control measures, and oversight of asbestos abatement activities, if present. Hazardous building materials abatement monitoring and hazardous materials removal monitoring will be performed under the direct supervision of a Certified Industrial Hygienists (CIHs) and/or other appropriately qualified environmental professionals (i.e., a Certified Asbestos Consultant and/or Lead Risk Assessor/Inspector), as applicable. Excavation monitoring will include oversight of soil handling, stockpiling, transport, and disposal activities, as well as implementation of air monitoring, emission controls, and work practices pursuant to SCAQMD Rules 1150, 1166, and 1466. Roux will document monitoring activities through daily field logs, monitoring reports, and regulatory notifications, as required, and will coordinate closely with the City, SMU, SCAQMD, and other applicable agencies to ensure demolition- and construction-phase environmental controls are implemented effectively and in accordance with approved plans, permits, and regulatory requirements. O. Optional – Geotechnical Services Roux’s trusted team member Hushmand Associates, Inc. (HAI) will provide geotechnical engineering support for the Project, under Roux’s project management and coordination. The geotechnical effort is structured to build efficiently upon existing subsurface data while performing targeted field exploration necessary to support current design, grading, foundation, and infiltration requirements. Page 1163 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 10 The work will begin with a review of available geotechnical information to develop a site‑specific understanding of subsurface conditions and identify data gaps relative to current California Building Code and ASCE 7‑22 seismic design requirements. Based on this review, HAI will perform targeted geotechnical exploration, including cone penetration testing, limited soil borings, and infiltration testing, designed to minimize site disturbance while providing data suitable for engineering analysis. Geotechnical analyses will address grading considerations, foundation support, seismic site classification, and infiltration feasibility consistent with anticipated project development. The results will be documented in a geotechnical report prepared by HAI that integrates new field data with existing information and provides practical, implementable recommendations to support project design and construction planning. Throughout Task O, Roux will serve as the primary point of contact for the City, coordinating subconsultant activities, managing interfaces with other technical disciplines, and ensuring that geotechnical recommendations are aligned with environmental constraints, CEQA documentation, and overall project objectives. P. Optional – Other CEQA-Related Services Optional Task – SoundPLAN Construction Noise Modeling If requested, the team will use SoundPLAN three‑dimensional noise modeling to evaluate construction noise with refined inputs such as receptor elevations, shielding, ground absorption, and equipment location assumptions, and will include modeled noise contours suitable for decision‑maker communication and CEQA documentation support. Optional Task – Preliminary Low Impact Development (LID) Plan If requested, the team will prepare a preliminary LID Plan consistent with the applicable NPDES permit requirements, selecting feasible BMP concepts using City‑provided geotechnical infiltration feasibility information and incorporating two rounds of City comments into a final preliminary submittal. Optional Task – Preliminary CEQA Findings Meeting The team will meet with City staff after completion of the technical studies to summarize key findings and provide a clear recommendation on whether an exemption is feasible prior to initiating the Initial Study. Optional Task – Exemption Memorandum If City staff elect to pursue an exemption, the team will document the basis for the exemption in a brief memorandum, prepare a draft Notice of Exemption, and support filing/posting activities as authorized by the City. Anticipated Deliverables: A. Technical Studies  Attendance at up to one in-person Kickoff Meeting ­ One electronic and up to ten hard copies of the Agenda ­ One electronic copy of the Meeting Minutes and one electronic copy of the revised minutes, as needed  One electronic copy of the VMT Screening Memo for Review and one electronic copy of a revised memo  One electronic copy of the modeling outputs for the Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emission/Energy analyses (to be appended to the Initial Study)  One electronic copy of the noise measurement and noise modeling outputs  One electronic copy of the Cultural and Paleontological Resources Memo  Native American Consultation Assistance: ­ Draft letters ­ Mailing Log B. Draft and Final DEQA Documents  One electronic copy and up to four hardcopies of the Administrative Draft IS/MND with Technical Appendices on USB drives for initial review  One electronic copy of and up to four hardcopies of the Screencheck Draft IS/MND with Technical Appendices on USB drives for second rounds review  One electronic copy and up to four hardcopies of the Public Review Draft IS/MND with Technical Appendices on USB drives for public review  Up to 25 hard copies of the NOA/NOI;  One electronic copy of each: Draft and Final Notice (NOA/NOI, NOC, NOD);  One electronic (ADA accessible) copy of the State Clearinghouse Submittal Package (to be posted via CEQASubmit by Michael Baker): ­ Public Review Draft IS/MND and Appendices ­ State Clearinghouse Summary Form ­ NOA/NOI ­ NOC C. Optional – Combined CEQA/NEPA  One electronic copy of the NEPA CE Memo and one electronic copy of a revised memo. D. MMRP  One electronic copy of the MMRP and one electronic copy of a revised MMRP. E. Public Outreach  PowerPoint Presentation assistance, as needed Page 1164 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 11  Attendance at up to three in-person public hearings F. Project Management  Meeting agendas and minutes  Action item tracking log  Coordination summaries with agencies, stakeholders, and the public  Periodic progress updates to City staff  Monthly invoices G. Hazardous Materials Studies Updated for Current Regulations i. ESAs and SSIs ­ Updated Phase II ESA and/or SSI Report ii. Hazardous Materials Surveys ­ Updated Lead Survey Report ­ Updated Asbestos Survey Report ­ Updated PCB Survey Report (if applicable) iii. HHRA ­ Updated HHRA ­ Executive summary suitable for CEQA inclusion iv. CAP  Updated CAP including evaluation of SCAQMD Rules 1166, 1466, and 1150  Demolition and construction monitoring plans  Hazardous building materials abatement monitoring specifications H. HASP  HASP I. Workplan Addendum to the CAP  CAP Workplan Addendum (includes 50-foot x 50- foot surface sampling; groundwater well installation, monitoring, and sampling; and soil vapor survey) J. Groundwater Monitoring  Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation and First Monitoring and Sampling Report  Groundwater Monitoring Reports (three quarterly/semi-annual) K. SMP  SMP L. Soil Vapor Surveying  Post-grading Soil Vapor Survey Report M. Services Leading to an NFA Letter  Regulatory coordination memoranda  CalGEM well records review and summary memorandum  Closure Reports submitted to oversight agencies  NFA or equivalent closure documentation (if achievable)  Deed restrictions or environmental covenants input (if required)  County Recorder filing documentation N. Monitoring During Demolition and Construction  Soils remediation and excavation monitoring logs  Air monitoring data and compliance documentation  Final Construction Environmental Monitoring Summary Report O. Optional – Geotechnical Services  Geotechnical Report P. Optional – Other CEQA-Related Services  Dependent on services selected Additional Services In addition to the Scope of Services identified in Items A through N, Roux can provide the following optional, value-added services to further support the City of Hermosa Beach, if requested. These services are not required to complete the Project but may be beneficial depending on project phasing, regulatory coordination needs, or future City objectives.  Post-Construction and Long-Term Site Management Support: Following completion of remediation and construction activities, Roux can assist the City with post-construction environmental support, including development and implementation of long-term operation, maintenance, and monitoring (OM&M) plans, post-closure monitoring programs, and periodic regulatory reporting. These services may be appropriate where engineered controls, land-use restrictions, or long-term monitoring obligations remain in place.  Environmental Support for Future Site Modifications: Roux can provide environmental evaluation and regulatory support for future site modifications, expansions, or changes in use that occur after project completion. This may include review of proposed improvements for consistency with recorded restrictions, evaluation of soil disturbance implications, and coordination with oversight agencies to maintain regulatory compliance.  On-Call Environmental Advisory and Rapid Response Services: Roux can provide as-needed, on-call environmental advisory services to support City staff during construction or future operations. These services may include rapid response to unforeseen environmental conditions, technical review of contractor submittals or change orders related to environmental issues, and coordination with regulatory agencies during unanticipated events. Page 1165 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 12  Enhanced Regulatory Strategy and Negotiation Support: Beyond standard closure coordination, Roux can support the City with advanced regulatory strategy development, including facilitation of agency negotiations, evaluation of alternative compliance pathways, and preparation of targeted technical memoranda to address complex or evolving regulatory concerns.  Data Management and Documentation Tools: Roux can develop project-specific environmental data management tools, including sampling databases, tracking spreadsheets, and summary dashboards, to assist the City with long-term documentation, regulatory tracking, and institutional knowledge retention.  Supplemental Community and Stakeholder Technical Support: Roux can support the City with additional community or stakeholder technical briefings beyond those required for the Project, including preparation of plain-language summaries, figures, or exhibits to support public transparency regarding site conditions, mitigation measures, or long-term management requirements. Roles and Responsibilities for City Staff Except as noted below, Roux will provide the professional services identified in the Scope of Work. Certain activities, approvals, and resources are expected to be provided by the City to support efficient project delivery. Work to Be Performed or Provided by the City Roux anticipates the City will provide the following resources, assistance, and actions necessary to complete the Scope of Services:  Designation of a City Project Manager and primary point of contact.  Timely review and consolidated comments on draft deliverables.  Direction regarding project priorities, phasing, and schedule adjustments.  Selection and approval of remedial alternatives, closure strategies, and land‑use assumptions.  Authorization for site access, including access to buildings, subsurface areas, and monitoring locations.  Coordination with City departments, tenants, and operations staff, as applicable.  Authorization to coordinate with regulatory agencies on the City’s behalf, as appropriate.  Provision of available historical environmental reports, prior regulatory correspondence, drawings, and as‑built information relevant to the site.  Disclosure of known site constraints, prior remedial actions, and institutional controls.  Lead role in formal communications with City commissions and City Council.  Issuance of official public notices and postings required by City procedures.  Participation in public meetings and hearings as required by CEQA and City process, with technical support provided by Roux and Michael Baker.  Execution of applications, agreements, and certifications that require City signature.  Filing documents with the County Clerk or County Recorder, with technical support from Roux as needed. Work not Included in Roux’s Scope of Work The following services, while referenced or implied within the Scope of Work, are not included in Roux’s scope and are assumed to be provided by the City or by others retained directly by the City, unless otherwise directed:  Geotechnical investigations, hydrology studies, and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs), consistent with Addendum 1 responses.  Architectural, civil, structural, or construction design services, including preparation of plans and specifications.  Construction, demolition, remediation, or abatement contracting services, including contractor means and methods.  Legal services, including preparation or review of legal instruments, except for technical support related to environmental covenants or deed restrictions.  Payment of permit fees, agency review fees, filing fees, or other regulatory fees, unless explicitly identified in the cost proposal.  Surveying services (boundary, topographic, or construction staking), except where incidental to environmental sampling location documentation. Roux will work collaboratively with City staff to integrate City-provided information and direction into the technical work. Roux will promptly notify the City if additional information, access, or decisions are required to maintain the project schedule or regulatory compliance. Page 1166 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 13 4 Project Management Plan The key to innovative, effective, and efficient project delivery is close coordination and communication between the City, the community, and the Consultant Team. Consistent with Roux’s established project management practices, our approach emphasizes proactive planning, transparent communications, disciplined scheduling, and a robust Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program that is applied consistently across all project phases. This plan is aligned with Roux’s corporate Quality Management Plan (QMP) and proven project execution methods used on public-sector environmental and infrastructure projects. Project Schedule Roux will implement a milestone-based project schedule that aligns with the Project Timeline identified in Section 1.2 of the RFP and supports timely decision-making by the City. The schedule is structured to allow efficient progression of tasks while accommodating agency review periods, City comment cycles, and public process requirements. Roux understands that this project involves both CEQA documentation and environmental investigation and remediation-related tasks, some of which may proceed concurrently. Where appropriate, Roux will perform tasks in parallel to reduce overall duration while maintaining regulatory compliance and quality control. The schedule will be refined in coordination with City staff following contract award and will be updated as needed to reflect City direction, agency review timelines, and field conditions. Roux will provide regular schedule updates and will promptly notify the City of any potential schedule impacts so that adjustments can be made proactively. Schedule Control and Coordination Roux will maintain schedule control through:  Clear task sequencing and milestone tracking  Regular coordination with City staff  Early identification of regulatory or field constraints  Efficient incorporation of City and agency comments This approach ensures that key deliverables are completed in a timely manner while maintaining flexibility to respond to evolving project needs. Anticipated Schedule for Key Deliverables Note: Certain tasks are dependent on City approvals, agency review timelines, and construction sequencing. The schedule will be adjusted as needed to remain consistent with the Project Timeline identified in the RFP. Page 1167 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 14 Communications Approach Roux’s communications philosophy is based on frequent, clear, and purposeful interactions to support informed decision-making and efficient project delivery. We view communication as an active management tool rather than a passive reporting function. City–Consultant Communications  Our designated Project Manager will act as the primary point of contact, supported by a Principal-level reviewer to ensure senior oversight and continuity.  Regular project check-ins, typically consisting of: ­ Weekly or biweekly status emails summarizing progress, upcoming tasks, and action items. ­ Biweekly or monthly coordination calls or virtual meetings to review schedule status, technical issues, and upcoming decisions.  Meetings conducted via virtual platforms as the default, with in-person meetings scheduled when beneficial for workshops, site walks, or key milestones, subject to City preference. Interdepartmental and Community Coordination  Communications protocols for coordination with other City departments, regulatory agencies, and community stakeholders will be established during individual project kick-off meetings.  Roux will support City-led community engagement by providing clear, technically accurate materials and participating in meetings as requested, ensuring that information is conveyed in an understandable and transparent manner.  This approach ensures consistent alignment among all parties while minimizing administrative burden and maintaining responsiveness throughout the project lifecycle. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Approach Roux will implement its established, companywide QA/QC program throughout the term of the agreement. This program is documented in Roux’s corporate Quality Management Plan and has been successfully applied across a wide range of public-sector projects. QA/QC Framework  Each task will have a designated, qualified Task Manager responsible for day-to-day quality control, operating under the oversight of the Project Manager and an appropriately qualified Principal-level reviewer.  Quality control procedures are applied to all aspects of work, including field activities, data management, technical analyses, calculations, and report preparation.  Roux’s internal review process includes independent technical and managerial reviews, often referred to as a “cold-eye” or peer review, to verify technical accuracy, regulatory compliance, and consistency with project objectives. Ensuring High-Quality Work  Clear definition of quality objectives and applicable regulatory and technical requirements at project initiation.  Training and mentoring of assigned personnel to ensure familiarity with project-specific procedures and quality expectations.  Verification that all team members, subcontractors, and suppliers understand and follow applicable QA/QC procedures.  Periodic audits and reviews of work products to confirm adherence to quality standards and to identify opportunities for continuous improvement. Page 1168 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 15 5 Experience and Qualifications Summary of Relevant Projects El Modena–Irvine Channel Enhanced Maintenance Project, North Tustin, California Year started and completed (if relevant): 2019 – 2020 Contracting Agency + Department: Orange County Public Works Key Personnel Assigned: David DeVries – Roux, Michael Baker International Contract Value: $200,000 Roux, in partnership with Michael Baker International (MBI) and Orange County Public Works, led a targeted investigation and remediation effort to address petroleum- impacted soils beneath the El Modena–Irvine Channel. The project’s primary objective was to assess the extent of contamination and implement effective mitigation measures to protect local water quality and channel integrity. Site Assessment: Roux conducted a comprehensive soil investigation, working closely with County personnel and equipment. The assessment determined that petroleum contamination was confined to a 40-foot section of the channel bottom. Mitigation Planning: A detailed workplan was developed, featuring the design of a low permeability layer (LPL) composed of a geosynthetic clay liner and protective geotextile. This solution was engineered to prevent the migration of historic petroleum hydrocarbons. Regulatory Coordination: The workplan received approval from Orange County and was subsequently submitted to the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB). Upon SARWQCB approval, Roux managed the implementation of the mitigation strategy. Remediation and Restoration: The project included:  Site preparation and air monitoring in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1166  Excavation and offsite disposal of approximately 519 tons of contaminated soil  Installation of the LPL, followed by placement of gravel and riprap to restore the channel’s structural integrity The remediation was completed successfully in December 2020. The project effectively mitigated the risk of petroleum hydrocarbon migration, restored the channel’s function, and ensured compliance with environmental regulations. Various buildings including the Theatre Restrooms, Nursing Building, Snack Bar, General Classrooms Building, and the Administration Building, Los Angeles, California Year started and completed (if relevant): 2023 Contracting Agency + Department: Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD) Key Personnel Assigned: Robert Menald – Titan and Albert Sanchez – Titan Contract Value: $20,000 Titan conducted a comprehensive hazardous materials inspection for the LACCD to evaluate the presence of ACMs, LBPs, and PCBs. As part of this effort, Titan reviewed prior inspection and survey reports to assess the completeness of historical data and to identify any data gaps or suspect materials that were not previously addressed. During the document review, Titan noted that several materials and components observed during the field assessment had not been sampled or were not included in earlier reports. In response, Titan collected new samples from these previously unassessed suspect materials to ensure a more thorough and up-to-date evaluation of potential hazardous building materials. The field inspection and supplemental sampling encompassed multiple structures across the campus, specifically including the Theatre Restrooms, Nursing Building, Snack Bar, General Classrooms Building, and the Administration Building. Titan's inspection aimed to provide LACCD with a complete and compliant hazardous materials inventory in preparation for upcoming renovation, demolition, or maintenance activities. Crocker St. - Hazardous Materials Survey, Phase I ESA, and Property Condition Assessment, Los Angeles County, California Year started and completed (if relevant): March – June 2024 Contracting Agency + Department: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Key Personnel Assigned: David Devries – Roux, Nancy Anglin - Roux, and Robert Menald – Titan Contract Value: $125,000 Roux performed a Phase I ESA for seven parcels using ASTM International Standard Practice E1527-21 (referred to hereinafter as “ASTM E1527-21”) and “all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the Page 1169 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 16 Property” to qualify for liability protection under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Roux’s team member and subcontractor Titan performed Hazardous Material Surveys for six parcels, which included a Lead Containing Materials (LCM) survey, Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) survey, and a universal waste survey. Roux’s subcontractor performed a property condition assessment (PCA) for three parcels. The PCA was performed in general accordance with the industry-standard ASTM E2018-24, Standard Guide for Property Condition Assessments: Baseline Property Condition Assessment Process. The PCA assessed the general physical condition and maintenance status of the parcels and recommended repair/maintenance items that were considered significant for the properties to continue current operations and/or be restored to a good condition with comparable projects. Helen Keller Park, Historical Dump Investigation, Remediation, and Closure, Los Angeles County, California Year started and completed (if relevant): 2012 – 2016 Contracting Agency + Department: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Key Personnel Assigned: Nancy Anglin - Roux Contract Value: ~$1,400,000 Ms. Anglin directed and managed environmental projects for this multiple-award, on-call contract supporting numerous sites throughout Los Angeles County. Projects included evaluation of asbestos, lead, and mold; USTs; hazardous materials and wastes; former landfills; and other contaminants in/on building materials, soil, groundwater, and air. Typical projects included the preparation of Phase I and II ESAs, plans, drawings, and cost estimates for abatement, remediation, and disposal of contaminants, and many included providing bidding/construction support, abatement monitoring, and site closures. The following is a description of one representative project: As the Principal-in-Charge, Ms. Anglin served as the primary liaison between Los Angeles County and multiple regulatory oversight agencies including various Los Angeles County departments, the Local Enforcement Agency, RWQCB, CalRecycle, DTSC, and SCAQMD, for a complex park remodeling project located on a historic landfill. She led and coordinated a large, multidisciplinary team to address a wide range of environmental and engineering challenges, including landfill assessment, Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) analysis, Phase I ESA, methane mitigation design, hazardous building materials, geotechnical considerations, and an engineered cap design. A critical element of the project’s success was Ms. Anglin’s proactive and strategic engagement with regulators, resulting in agency concurrence on legal and technical interpretations that allowed asbestos-containing materials to remain safely buried on site. Through diligent coordination and continuous communication with the regulatory agencies, the project was completed on an expedited schedule, allowing the Count to advance park construction with limited delays while maintaining full regulatory compliance. Ms. Anglin also supported the County’s public outreach efforts by providing clear, defensible technical input for community engagement. Key studies and deliverables included:  Phase I ESA  Methane Survey  Form 200 Application and Enrollment Under General Post-Closure Waste Discharge Requirements  Soil Management Plan  Phase II Site Investigation and Groundwater Well Installation  SWAT Assessment  HHRA  Tree Drip Line Investigation  SCAQMD Procedure 5 Plan  Engineered Waste Cover (Cap) Alternatives  Landfill Gas Monitoring Program and Contingency Plan  Methane Detection and Alarm System Design and Installation  Closure Operation and Maintenance Plan Construction Monitoring Support Burbank Water and Power Campus Stormwater Improvement Project – City of Burbank, California Year started and completed (if relevant): 2024 Contracting Agency + Department: City of Burbank Department of Water and Power Key Personnel Assigned: Nancy Anglin – Roux Contract Value: $60,000 Roux was retained by a Prime Contractor on behalf of the City of Burbank to provide construction monitoring support for the Burbank Water and Power (BWP) Campus Stormwater Improvement Project located at 164 West Magnolia Boulevard, Burbank, California (site). To comply with regional, state, and federal water quality standards, BWP constructed on-site stormwater improvements, as well Page 1170 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 17 as improvements to the adjacent off-site stormwater drainage system. The goals for the project were:  Construct new stormwater facilities to separate on-and off-site drainage.  Assist in recharging the regional aquifer.  Provide a source of make-up water for BWP Campus operations.  Achieve Regional, State, and Federal water quality standards for BWP Campus runoff.  Construct off-site storm water facilities to improve the quality of off-site storm water. The purpose of this project was to construct a new connection to the Burbank Western Channel (BWC) to discharge stormwater generated off site of the BWP Campus. The intention is to prevent comingling of off-site and on-site stormwater. The new connection to the BWC does not bring stormwater to the channel; rather, it moved the existing discharge location and changed the point at which it makes the connection to the channel. In support of the project, Roux on behalf of the Prime Contractor, prepared a Soil Management Plan (SMP) to support planned earthwork at the site. This SMP was communicated to and used by all contractors involved in activities where site soils were disturbed and included protective measures to be implemented in consideration of residual soil impacts associated with the historical uses of the site. Roux also provided earthmoving monitoring in general accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1166. Soils were monitored using a calibrated photoionization detector (PID) in accordance with the SMP. The total amount of soil removed from the site was approximately 7,150 cubic yards. Following completion of the excavation, the stormwater drain construction activities commenced. References City of Whittier Regino De Avila, Civil Engineering Associate 13230 Penn Street Whittier, CA 90602 562-567-9500 rdeavila@cityofwhittier.org Roux assisted the City of Whittier with environmental compliance for transportation improvement projects requiring CEQA review and construction-phase controls. Services included preparation of Construction Contingency Plans and mitigation measures to manage hazardous materials and protect stormwater quality during roadway and intersection improvements, consistent with CEQA and local regulatory requirements. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Gregory Sena - Supervising Engineering Geologist II 900 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803-1331 626-458-2529 GSena@dpw.lacounty.gov Roux provides on‑call environmental assessment, remediation, and compliance services to Los Angeles County Department of Public Works under a multi‑year contract. Services performed under this program include Phase I ESAs, Phase II site investigations, soil and groundwater sampling, remediation planning and oversight, hazardous building materials surveys, and property condition assessments, delivered on a task‑order basis. Roux also provides principal‑level technical review, regulatory coordination, and program oversight to support County capital projects, acquisitions, and redevelopment initiatives. City of Los Angeles, Department of Recreation and Parks Lisa Walldez, Environmental Specialist III 221 North Figueroa Street, Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90012 213-202-2664 Lisa.Walldez@lacity.org Roux provides environmental consulting services to the City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks under a multi‑year, task‑order–based contract supporting citywide parks projects. Services include environmental site assessments, remediation planning and oversight, regulatory compliance, and technical review for park improvement and redevelopment projects including a remedial cap evaluation under DTSC’s oversight. Roux supports the Department’s implementation of environmental due diligence and corrective action activities across multiple park facilities, coordinating with City stakeholders and regulatory agencies to support safe public use and long‑term environmental compliance. Organizational Chart Our organization chart that reflects key staff and roles/responsibilities of each individual assigned to provide services under this Proposal is presented on the following page. Page 1171 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 18 Figure 1: Proposed Organization Chart for City of Hermosa Beach RFP 26-003 City Yard Replacement Project Page 1172 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 19 Experience and Qualifications of Key Personnel A summary of our team members is discussed below. Resumes for each of our project team members are provided in Appendix B which includes their background, degrees and certifications, professional memberships/registrations , and additional relevant experience. Team Members Professional Profile Biographies Program Manager Nancy Anglin, PE, ENV SP Ms. Anglin is a registered professional engineer and Envision Sustainability Professional with more than 30 years of experience in investigations of proposed demolition and construction projects for waste management and worker safety requirements, and evaluations of properties proposed for acquisition to determine the environmental liability the purchaser may be acquiring along with the property. She prepares hazardous materials surveys and soil/groundwater/waste management plans and other environmental plans needed for construction projects involving contaminated sites. She also prepares bid plans and specifications for the contractors performing construction activities on contaminated projects, responds to RFIs, and assists with implementing grant funding. Ms. Anglin has extensive experience working in the public sector including for many Southern California cities on projects like this one. Executive Sponsor Jay Shipley, PE As National Director of Public Sector & Industrial Services, Jay Shipley has established a deep portfolio of executive-level program management for large public-sector clients throughout the Los Angeles region. His work includes leading multi-year, multi-million-dollar environmental consulting programs for transportation agencies and major municipalities, where he oversees integrated teams, contractual performance, stakeholder coordination, and technical delivery. Mr. Shipley currently serves as Program Manager for Roux’s Environmental MATOC Contract with LACCD overseeing all aspects of the contract. He also serves as the Program Manager for a five-year On-Call Environmental Assessment, Remediation, and Compliance Services Contract with the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, providing strategy implementation, contract oversight, and principal-level technical review. Mr. Shipley also manages complex municipal programs for multiple City of Los Angeles entities. His representative work includes executive program management for the City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks (LARAP) under a five-year task order contract, where he oversees environmental consulting services supporting citywide parks projects. Project Manager David DeVries, PG, CHg Mr. DeVries is a Senior Hydrogeologist with a strong history of managing environmental projects and programs in Southern California. His responsibilities have included scope-of-work development, contract negotiations, project execution, project closeout, and auditing. Mr. DeVries’ experience includes RI/FSs; long-term monitoring; remedial design and implementation; Phase I and Phase II ESAs; upgrade design and closure of USTs; geophysical surveys; dewatering well design and installation; and environmental regulatory compliance. He has directed teams on a variety of projects, including those involving multiple stakeholders and property owners and various regulatory agencies. For more than 20 years, he has managed large scale on-call/multiple site programs that have provided him with invaluable experience and understanding of building and collaborating with teams of staff, subcontractors, agencies, and the client. Mr. DeVries technical specialties include environmental hydrogeology; managing and implementing soil and groundwater investigations and remediation; managing large environmental subsurface investigation and remediation programs for public agencies and private corporations; managing large projects involving complex contaminants in soil and groundwater (e.g., metals, volatile organics, 1,4-dioxane, and hexavalent chromium). Page 1173 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 20 Risk Assessor Catherine Boston, MPH, DABT Ms. Boston is a board-certified toxicologist with more than 14 years of experience. Her career has focused on the assessment of human health and environmental hazards. Her multidisciplinary training in geology, human health risk assessment and toxicology provides full-spectrum support for remedial investigations, environmental litigation, and risk communication. Ms. Boston’s areas of expertise include:  Human health risk assessment  Exposure assessment  Toxicological evaluations  Toxic tort evaluations  Site investigation and remediation  Allocation of environmental hazard contribution  Statistical data analysis, including ProUCL, SAS, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and R. Ms. Boston’s work in toxicology and human health risk includes emerging contaminants, quantitative risk assessment, exposure assessments, interpretation, critique, and analysis of epidemiological and toxicological evaluations. Ms. Boston has experience weaving together multiple lines of evidence to help fully understand general causation issues in toxic tort matters. Ms. Boston has leveraged her expertise in a variety of contexts: she has worked closely with industry groups to proactively assess potential human health risks of emerging chemicals, has served as liaison between technical and non-technical audiences, and has provided technical support to local health agencies and municipalities. Environmental Specialist Kristen Bogue - MBI Ms. Bogue is a senior project manager and assists in the preparation of environmental and planning studies, with a focus on due diligence planning activities. Ms. Bogue has experience in the research, analysis, and writing of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)/National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation. Ms. Bogue's project management background includes a variety of projects involving mixed-use, hotel/resort, residential, commercial, redevelopment, infrastructure, and industrial uses for both public and private sector clients. In addition to being a CEQA/NEPA generalist, she specializes in the preparation of hazardous materials studies and visual analysis services. Ms. Bogue has prepared numerous hazardous materials related studies, including Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Phase I Initial Site Assessments for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessments pursuant to CEQA, and Environmental Baseline Surveys for the Department of the Navy. Additionally, she is involved with Visual Impact Assessments in conformance with appropriate agency standards, including the Federal Highway Administration "Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) for Highway Projects," United States Bureau of Land Management guidelines, and California Energy Commission guidelines. Other visual services Ms. Bogue has prepared include photosimulations, shade/shadow studies, viewshed mapping, and light and glare studies. As a specialist in these specific environmental topic areas, Ms. Bogue has extensive experience with projects involving sensitive planning and environmental issues including aesthetics/light and glare, shade/shadow, and hazardous materials considerations. Field Manager - Titan Robert Menald, CAC, CMI, LRCIA, LRCPM, CIEC Mr. Menald has worked in the environmental field since 2002. He currently provides management of all staff in Southern and Northern California. His project experience includes conducting and reviewing asbestos, lead, mold, indoor air quality and hazardous materials surveys/inspections and PCBs investigations; monitoring and managing asbestos, lead, mold and hazardous materials abatement and remediation activities; and preparing and reviewing technical reports, work plans, and job specifications. 6 Required Forms Required forms are provided in Appendix C. 7 Cost Proposal Our cost proposal is provided via the PlanetBids Portal as a separate file. Page 1174 of 1339 Appendix A Site Plan Page 1175 of 1339 VALLEY DRIVE(E) PARKING6TH STREETFORMER OIL WELL"STINNETT 1" TANK AREAFORMEROIL WELL"STINNETT 1"AREALEGENDAPPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARYAPPROXIMATE EXTENT OF FORMER LANDFILL AREAPROPOSED SOIL BORING LOCATIONSPROPOSED SOIL VAPOR LOCATIONSPROPOSED GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATIONSPrepared for:Title:Compiled by: Prepared by:Project Mgr:File:Date:Project:Scale:FIGURE1SITE PLAN WITH PROPOSED SOIL,SOIL VAPOR AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS555 6TH STREETHERMOSA BEACH, CACITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CAN.A.T.A.T.A.2026-03-161" = 40'NOTES1. SITE PLAN AND FORMER LANDFILL BOUNDARIES SOURCED FROM CORRECTIVEACTION PLAN PREPARED BY DUDEK, DATED SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 .Page 1176 of 1339 Appendix B Resumes Page 1177 of 1339 PROFESSIONAL PROFILE 1 Nancy Anglin, PE, ENV SP Principal Engineer | Operations Manager EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Over 30 years of experience in environmental engineering and technical leadership for public- and private-sector clients. Extensive background in contaminated site investigation, environmental due diligence, waste management planning, regulatory coordination, and large infrastructure project support, including direct experience working for multiple Southern California cities, Counties, and agencies on similar scopes of work. Representative cities include Burbank, Carson, City of Industry, Irvine, Laguna Beach, Los Angeles, Santa Ana, Torrance, Whittier, and others. Direct experience working the County of Los Angeles Fire Department Site Mitigation Unit (SMU), Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC), California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), South Coast Air Quality Management District, and other local agencies. TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES Evaluation of contaminated properties and construction projects for environmental liability, waste management, and worker safety; preparation of soil, groundwater, and waste management plans; development of bid plans and specifications; RFI support; and assistance with implementation of grant-funded projects. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS On-Call Services for the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works; Helen Keller Park; Los Angeles, CA. Principal-in-Charge for multiple awards of on-call environmental services contracts. One representative project included redevelopment of a former dump site discovered under a park. Acted as liaison between the County and the numerous regulatory oversight agencies (various county agencies, Local Enforcement Agency, RWQCB, CalRecycle, DTSC, SCAQMD). Managed a large team of staff with diverse expertise to address the many issues associated with the park remodeling project (historic landfill, Solid Waste Assessment Test [SWAT] analysis, Phase I ESA, methane mitigation design, hazardous building materials, geotechnical, etc.), and supported the County with technical input for its public outreach. A key aspect of the project's success was the team's ability to obtain regulatory agreement of legal interpretations to allow asbestos to remain buried on site. Southern California Regional Rail Authority Contractor, Keller Yard Layover Facility Project, Los Angeles, CA. Project Manager for environmental support of a rail yard expansion near Union Station. The site was located on a former manufactured gas plant subject (MGP) to a DTSC land covenant. Prepared a comprehensive Environmental Management Plan, including SWPPP, SMP, HASP, dust and noise control, and SCAQMD Rules 403, 404, and 1166 compliance plans; and provided experienced environmental monitors to conduct XRF, PID soil screening, and perimeter air monitoring in compliance with DTSC requirements. Burbank Water and Power (BWP), Campus Stormwater Improvement Project, Burbank, CA. Served as Principal-in-Charge for Roux’s construction monitoring support provided to the Prime Contractor on behalf of the City of Burbank for the BWP Campus Stormwater Improvement Project. The project involved construction of on-site and off-site stormwater improvements to meet regional, state, and federal water quality standards, including separation of on- and off-site drainage, aquifer recharge, and improvements to the Burbank Western Channel discharge connection. Oversaw preparation and implementation of a Soil Management Plan addressing residual impacts from historical site uses, coordinated earthwork monitoring in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1166, and supervised soil screening using PID instrumentation during excavation. Approximately 7,150 cubic yards of soil were managed and removed prior to completion of storm drain construction activities. CONTACT INFORMATION Main: (310) 879-4900 Direct: (562 8646-446) Email: nanglin@rouxinc.com Website: www.rouxinc.com 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway Suite 450, Long Beach, CA 90804 EDUCATION BS, Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada, May 1993 Graduate Studies, Civil Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Canada PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Professional Engineer, No. C94772 (California) Qualified Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Developer (QSD) Envision Sustainability Professional (ENV SP) National Registry of Environmental Professionals, Registered Environmental Manager (REM) and Certified Waste Management Professional (CWMP) Page 1178 of 1339 Nancy Anglin, PE, ENV SP | Professional Profile www.rouxinc.com 2 On-Call Services for the Orange County Great Park; City of Irvine; Irvine, CA. Principal-in-Charge for on-call environmental services for the Orange County Great Park. Marine Corps Air Station El Toro was transformed into the Orange County Great Park in the geographic center of Orange County. An area spanning ~4,600 acres, the Great Park master plan includes recreation areas, competitive sports facilities, and parkland; preserves the environment and Orange County's agricultural heritage; and honors the military history of the former air base. As contract manager and principal-in-charge, Ms. Anglin led services including regulatory interpretation; performance of health and safety evaluations; and identification, abatement, remediation, or legal disposal of contaminated soil, lead-based paint, asbestos-containing materials, USTs, drums, wastes, pipelines, and other materials that were used, abandoned, and not documented at a military facility of this type and vintage. Water Tank Ravine Burn Site Remediation; City of Laguna Beach; Laguna Beach, CA. Task lead for the remediation and restoration of a historical burn site containing hazardous levels of metals in a steep sloped ravine located in a designated open space area. Services included background review, comprehensive site assessment, waste profiling, remedial action plan preparation (including a waste management plan, field sampling and analysis plan, quality assurance/quality control plan, and site health and community health and safety plan), waste removal oversight, human health risk evaluation, background study, and removal action completion reporting. Ms. Anglin's role on this project included managing the team to address the issues associated with the waste removal project and coordinating with the city (client). City of Fullerton, Environmental Support, Raymond Avenue Grade Separation, Fullerton, CA. Contract manager, led the environmental support for this grade separation project in Fullerton intersecting BNSF railroad right-of-way (R/W). The project started with Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), when Evaluated possible site contamination issues associated with parcel acquisition and provided remediation bid specifications and estimates of remediation costs to be set aside in an escrow account. For the City of Fullerton, under the direction of the Construction Manager (CM), Ms. Anglin’s team provided environmental construction support including RFI response, site sampling, interpretation of waste types, and waste profiling. Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), Airfield Terminal Modernization Project (ATMP), Environmental Compliance Reviews, Los Angeles, CA. Ms. Anglin acted as contract manager for a Prime under a LAWA on-call A&E contract. Her team conducted environmental compliance reviews for the LAWA ATMP. The purpose of this project was to ensure continued compliance with federal, state, and local environmental regulations as the architect completes the design for LAWA's ATMP. To ensure compliance, the team conducted thorough reviews of all relevant documents and files such as project design documents; California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents; historical resource reports; and LAWA's design, construction, and sustainability guidance documents. The team made appropriate findings and recommendations based on reviews and presented those to the client to aid its further planning and decision- making processes. Various Clients, Caltrans Environmental Support, Southern CA. As Project Manager and Contract Manager, Ms. Anglin has over 20 years of experience working as a consultant to Caltrans or to cities and agencies that are performing construction activities in Caltrans R/W or under Caltrans management/oversight. As a former contract and task manager for four as-needed contracts with Caltrans, Ms. Anglin understands their processes. Projects included initial site assessments (ISAs); SIs, ADL surveys, methane and hydrogen sulfide evaluations, and investigations comparing surface and groundwater properties; and preparing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit applications for proposed construction dewatering projects. LA Metro I-5 North County Enhancement Project (NCEP), Los Angeles County, CA. Principal-in-Charge of a team that provided support to LA Metro for a $500 million enhancement project along a 16- mile stretch of a Southern California Interstate. Project tasks included working as the client’s site representative; confirming contractor compliance with the project SWPPP and other environmental documents; performing weekly SWPPP BMP inspections; reviewing contractor environmental submittals; responding to RFIs; and interpreting regulations. PROFESSIONAL TRAININGS OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER/Annual 8-Hr Refresher OSHA 8-Hour HAZWOPER Supervisor Training OSHA 24-Hour First Responder Operations Level OSHA Excavation Competent Person Certification Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) California Hazardous Waste Classification Confined Space Entry First Aid, CPR/ AED PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure Women’s Transportation Seminar (WTS) International Page 1179 of 1339 PROFESSIONAL PROFILE 1 Jay M. Shipley, PE National Director of Public Sector & Industrial Services Principal Engineer EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Shipley is a client-focused, senior-level executive with over twenty-five years of proven leadership in the global environmental design and consulting market. He creates and implements business growth strategies through investments in people, practices, and clients. Mr. Shipley understands the nuances of the environmental market locally and nationally, as well as how to successfully collaborate and execute integrated projects on a global scale. He has a track record of success managing large groups of professionals, leading global account programs, developing and executing strategic plans, and delivering results. TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES Mr. Shipley’s technical experience covers a broad spectrum of environmental consulting activities including designing, installing, and operating soil and groundwater treatment systems employing various remedial technologies including high vacuum and dual-phase extraction, carbon adsorption, thermal and catalytic oxidation, air sparging, in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO), and advanced oxidation. In addition, Mr. Shipley has directed or managed hundreds of groundwater and soil contamination projects. He has been involved in numerous large acquisitions and due diligence efforts, as well as supporting contractual negotiations to manage environmental liabilities. He has also managed soil and groundwater investigation/remediation projects for private sector and public sector clients; performed pilot studies for soil vapor extraction (SVE), air sparging, landfill gas recovery, and groundwater and wastewater treatment systems; prepared and reviewed technical reports, proposals, and bid packages; and worked as a corrosion engineer designing, installing, and testing cathodic protection systems. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS • Director, U.S. Municipal Sector for the Arcadis' Environmental Business Line, responsible for the growth and strategy of the environmental municipal market within the greater United States. Specific achievements include: o Established a strategic plan and structure for US municipal market. o Managed winning strategy and pursuit of $1.5 million Green Business contract with major LA municipal agency. This was the first ever environmental award for Arcadis. o Led winning pursuit of two separate three-year/$15 million on-call contracts with the City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks (LARAP). o Led five-year, $75 million winning pursuit for major urban transportation agency to manage environmental construction services. o Prepared the strategy for a muti-year, multi-million-dollar environmental contract with the State of Florida. o Team leader for large contract wins for the City of Chicago and Chicago Metra. • Program Manager for a $20 million urban redevelopment project consisting of a contaminated industrial property located adjacent to the Los Angeles River and in an underserved community. The Site had been used for various industrial purposes since about 1910 and included several structures, underground storage tanks, and areas of subsurface contamination. Worked closely with stakeholders and regulatory agencies to develop a comprehensive assessment and remediation plan for the Site that aligned with the ultimate use of the Site as a community park. CONTACT INFORMATION Main: (310 0049-879) Direct: (562) 446-8642 Email: jshipley@rouxinc.com Website: www.rouxinc.com 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway Suite 450 Long Beach, CA 90804 EDUCATION MBA, University of Redlands, 2001 BS, Chemical Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, 1998 Page 1180 of 1339 Jay M. Shipley, PE | Professional Profile www.rouxinc.com 2 • Global Client Executive for a $115 billion multinational conglomerate consisting of 13 major companies employing over 130,000 people in 70+ countries. Responsible for overall account leadership and growth across three global business lines. Assumed responsibility for the client after multiple years of client dissatisfaction and decreasing revenue. Major accomplishments include developing and implementing plans to stabilize revenue and eliminate project losses, securing position as one of two global suppliers for the most technically challenging projects, and increasing revenue by over 20%. • Global Account Manager for a $800 million multinational industrial company. Organized and managed national and global teams to execute projects across multiple services including due diligence, property condition evaluations, compliance, and assessment and remediation. High-level involvement with C-level executives as a part of corporate acquisition strategy team. Maintained involvement with key technical elements of most projects, directed overall project strategy and technical approach, and guided agency discussions and negotiations. Mr. Shipley's contributions resulted in growing the client from one project in the US, to over 100 projects nationwide. In addition, Mr. Shipley expanded the service offerings to include ISO 14001 audits, compliance (air, water, safety), asbestos surveys, and due diligence support for global acquisitions. Mr. Shipley was also directly involved with securing and expanding work at several sites in Brazil. • Project Manager/Design Engineer for assessment and remediation activities at a metal processing/heat treating facility, responsible for designing and installing multiple SVE systems to address volatile organic compound (VOC) contamination at separate areas of the Site. Also designed, installed, and operated a permanganate injection pilot study for groundwater. The Site is currently being evaluated for soil closure. • Project Manager/Design Engineer for a remediation system to remove free product and reduce concentrations of benzene and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) in groundwater. The system consists of nine vapor extraction wells and seven air sparge wells connected to a thermal/catalytic oxidation system and an air sparge compressor, respectively. Design, permitting, and construction activities were complicated due to location within the right-of-way of a major freeway. • Project Manager for expedited site assessment and subsequent remediation at a biopharmaceutical manufacturing facility. Chlorinated solvents migrated into the subsurface via a leaking wastewater collection system. Impacted soil was remediated using a combination of excavation and soil vapor extraction. Upfront design, permitting, and procurement activities were completed in less than three weeks; field work had to be completed in one week to coincide with the plant's annual shutdown for major maintenance. • Lead Engineer responsible for designing and permitting a landfill gas collection, treatment, and monitoring system consisting of 20 gas extraction wells, collection header, vapor extraction blower unit, and vapor treatment unit. On-site buildings were constructed on a vapor barrier and outfitted with methane gas sensors and a gas monitoring network. • Project Manager/Engineer for a study to evaluate handling and storage practices of potentially hazardous blast grit material at a Department of Defense (DOD) ship repair facility. Duties included reviewing applicable regulations, preparing conceptual engineering design and specifications for a planned hazardous waste storage facility, and making recommendations regarding current grit handling and storage practices. • Project Manager working with the Army Corps of Engineers on preliminary site investigation projects to determine the existence of contamination resulting from DOD activities. Duties included management of day-to-day operations, client interaction, budget preparation, field work supervision, subcontractor scheduling, and final report preparation. • Engineer-in -charge of the operation and field engineering of a methane collection system consisting of six separate vapor extraction systems and 82 extraction wells. Duties included managing day-to-day operations, supervising field technicians, equipment modifications, data collection and interpretation, and instrumentation calibration. • Project Engineer for an ex situ vapor extraction/thermal oxidation project to remediate over 8,000 cubic yards of gasoline- contaminated soil excavated from a pipeline leak. Duties included engineering design, permitting, construction management, start-up, and system operation. • Designed and installed cathodic protection systems and related devices for underground storage tanks, aboveground storage tanks, pipelines, and water treatment facilities. Conducted field surveys, analyzed data collected during surveys, and prepared written reports based on the data. Additional responsibilities included preparing job bid packages, responding to requests for quotations, sales and business development, and managing existing clients. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Professional Chemical Engineer: California, No. CA04779 NACE Certified Cathodic Protection Specialist 40-Hour OSHA Training per zo CFR 1910.120 Page 1181 of 1339 PROFESSIONAL PROFILE 1 David DeVries, PG, CHg Senior Hydrogeologist EXPERIENCE SUMMARY David DeVries is a Senior Hydrogeologist with more than 32 years of experience leading environmental investigation and remediation programs throughout Southern California. His expertise includes developing scopes of work, negotiating contracts, executing complex projects, and overseeing regulatory compliance. He has managed multidisciplinary teams, coordinated with multiple stakeholders and agencies, and delivered large-scale, multi-site programs for both public agencies and private corporations. David’s technical background includes RI/FS projects; long-term monitoring; remedial design and implementation; Phase I/II ESAs; UST upgrades and closures; geophysical surveys; dewatering system design; and soil and groundwater remediation involving contaminants such as metals, VOCs, 1,4-dioxane, and hexavalent chromium. TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES Environmental hydrogeology; managing large subsurface investigation and remediation programs for public agencies and private corporations; managing large projects involving complex contaminants in soil and groundwater (e.g., metals, volatile organics, 1,4-dioxane, and hexavalent chromium). REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS OCPW, El Modena–Irvine Channel Enhanced Maintenance Project - North Tustin, CA. Managed the Project soil investigation, remediation design, and regulatory compliance oversight. Work included conducting targeted subsurface investigations to delineate petroleum‑impacted soils, developing a mitigation workplan integrating a low‑permeability geosynthetic clay liner system, and coordinating regulatory review with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, culminating in the successful mitigation of hydrocarbon migration risk and restoration of the channel. Brownfield Redevelopment – Anaheim, CA. Project Manager for the environmental scope supporting the residential redevelopment of a 7-acre former mixed-use property. Led soil, soil vapor, and groundwater investigations under a DTSC voluntary cleanup agreement. Prepared a PEA-Equivalent Report and final Remedial Action Workplan proposing vapor barrier systems beneath planned structures. Achieved DTSC approval, enabling project construction. Soil & Groundwater Remediation – Ricoh Electronics, Irvine, CA. Managed investigation and remediation addressing PCE impacts at a major manufacturing facility. Directed subsurface assessment, 24-hour aquifer testing, multi-zone groundwater well installation, and regulatory coordination with the Santa Ana RWQCB. Developed a remedial action plan involving excavation of 2,000 cubic yards of impacted soil and carbon-absorption groundwater treatment while maintaining facility operations. Property Transfer Remediation – Confidential Insurance Company, Irvine, CA. Led comprehensive characterization of soil, soil vapor, and groundwater impacts at a former electronics manufacturing site. Designed and implemented aboveground and in-situ remediation systems, oversaw construction and monitoring, and achieved regulatory closure with DTSC, RWQCB, and federal agencies. Katella Beautification Project – City of Anaheim, CA. Managed utility excavations involving contaminated soils and hazardous waste. Oversaw subcontractors, conducted soil sampling, assessed abandoned piping, and facilitated removal of asbestos-containing material. Effective coordination allowed construction activities to proceed without schedule delays. CONTACT INFORMATION Main (: 310 4900-879 ) Direct: (562) 446-8625 Email: ddevries@rouxinc.com Website: www.rouxinc.com 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway Suite 450 Long Beach, CA 90804 EDUCATION BS, Geology. Western Michigan University, Michigan, 1989 29CFR 1910.120 OSHA Hazwoper 40-Hr/8-Hr Refresher PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Certified Hydrogeologist (C.Hg.), No.594, CA, 1998 Certified Professional Geologist, No. 6313, State: CA, 1995 PUBLICATIONS Co-author, Bench-scale biodegradation tests to assess natural attenuation potential of 1,4-dioxane at three California sites., Bioremediation, 2015, Biodegradation of 1,4-dioxan Page 1182 of 1339 David DeVries, PG, CHg | Professional Profile www.rouxinc.com 2 Rail to River Project - Corridor Segment A, Additional Environmental Assessment, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA. Project manager of field operations and reporting for the installation of 119 hand auger bores along the 6.5-mile alignment. The scope of work includes advancing each bore to 5-feet below ground surface and collection of four samples per bore. Soil samples were analyzed for multiple parameters to assess for contaminants typically found along railroad lines and specific samples were selected for potential point source contaminates based on adjacent properties identified during previous due diligence investigations. Daily draft tech memo reports were provided to Metro and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) as the laboratory data became available, allowing collaboration and modifications concerning supplemental laboratory analyses. Engineering and Environmental Services On-Call Contract - Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (METRO), Various Locations, CA. Project Manager. On-call environmental services as sole source consultant were provided at 35 METRO sites throughout the greater Los Angeles area, including water sampling and air monitoring. Responsible for the contract, which involved 69 soil and groundwater site investigations and consulting projects associated with proposed rail line expansions, bus and train terminals, and subway tunnel groundwater monitoring. Management of this contract included working with METRO staff on scope-of-work planning and development Cost and Schedule Proposal (CSP) preparation or review of CSPs prepared by task managers, contract negotiations with the METRO Contracts Department and subcontractors, and monthly status reports of project budgets vs. scope completion, project closeout, and project auditing. Result: " …We at the MTA greatly appreciate the professional services provided to our organization by the AMEC (as Harding ESE) team….AMEC (as Harding ESE) has demonstrated the ability to provide excellent environmental consulting services on multiple projects.” -- Kathleen Sweet, MTA Environmental Specialist, Timothy Lindholm, MTA Environmental Specialist Percolation Ponds Hydrogeological Investigation - ExxonMobil Production Company Hill Property (South Belridge Oilfield), South Bell Ridge Oilfield, CA. Project Manager. Environmental services for a two-year hydrogeologic investigation and evaluation of Hill leased property (approximately 480 acres within an oilfield on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley) to assess potential impacts to underlying groundwater throughout the site from operation of infiltration ponds related to oilfield production activities. Included drilling and construction of groundwater monitoring wells, groundwater sampling, and sampling of 4 unlined surface impoundment ponds covering approximately 17.5 acres receiving approximately 4,300 bpd (180,000 gpd) of wastewater discharged to the impoundments for disposal by solar evaporation and percolation. Responsible for principal review, and communications with client regarding deliverables. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study - Monsanto Chemical Company, Chemical Manufacturing Facility, Long Beach, CA. Managed a California State Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) RI/FS. Work involved characterization of soil and groundwater contaminated with benzene and arsenic, quarterly groundwater monitoring, preparation of RI work plan documents, and agency interaction. Also managed aquifer step drawdown and subsequent 72- hour constant-rate aquifer pump test using a remedial extraction well. Results of the test were analyzed using the program AQTESOLV. Soil Investigation/Remediation - Home Depot U.S.A., Development Site, Los Angeles, CA. Project Manager. Managed the investigation and remediation of solvent-impacted soils during construction of a new Home Depot outlet. Planned and implemented an RI/FS. Work involved initial borings and soil sample analyses to assess the vertical and horizontal area of impact. Work also included determining soil cleanup levels by implementing attenuation factor equations from the Los Angeles RWQCB guidance document. Also coordinated and provided oversight of a 40-foot-deep sloped excavation for the removal of 7,000 cubic yards of soil, sample collection and onsite analyses during the entire excavation, and oversight and coordination of transportation and treatment of soil. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment - Viertel’s Towing Property, 500 Center Avenue, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA. Project manager of field operations and reporting for the drilling of and sampling from soil bores to assess contaminants prior to Metro’s acquisition of the property. The scope of work includes the installation of multi-nested soil vapor probes and collection and analysis of soil, soil vapor, groundwater, and indoor air samples. Project management tasks also include collaboration and communications with the DTSC, Metro, and communications with the current property owner. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment - Natural Gas Line Relocation Assessment, 9225 Aviation Boulevard, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA. Project manager of field operations and reporting for the drilling of and sampling from soil bores to assess contaminants prior to Southern California Gas Company’s (SCGs) relocation of two 30-inch diameter gas lines. The scope of work includes collection and analysis of soil samples from four borings adjacent to the current gas lines in the proposed area of their proposed relocation. Project management tasks also include collaboration and communications with SCG, Metro, and communications with the current property owner (Hertz). PUBLICATIONS Co-author, Bench-scale biodegradation tests to assess natural attenuation potential of 1,4-dioxane at three California sites., Bioremediation, 2015, Biodegradation of 1,4-dioxan Page 1183 of 1339 PROFESSIONAL PROFILE 1 Catherine Boston, MPH, DABT National Director of Human Health Risk Services Vice President | Principal Scientist | Risk Assessor EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Ms. Boston is a board-certified toxicologist with over fourteen years of experience: Roux (2009– Present); Island Creek Oysters (2005–2009). TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES Ms. Boston’s career has focused on the assessment of human health and environmental hazards. Her multidisciplinary training in geology, human health risk assessment and toxicology provides full- spectrum support for remedial investigations, environmental litigation, and risk communication. Ms. Boston’s areas of expertise include: • Human health risk assessment • Exposure assessment • Toxicological evaluations • Toxic tort evaluations • California’s Proposition 65 evaluations • Site investigation and remediation • Allocation of environmental hazard contribution • Statistical data analysis, including ProUCL, SAS, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and R. Ms. Boston’s work in toxicology and human health risk includes emerging contaminants, quantitative risk assessment, exposure assessments, and interpretation, critique, and analysis of epidemiological and toxicological evaluations. Ms. Boston has experience weaving together multiple lines of evidence to help fully understand general causation issues in toxic tort matters. Ms. Boston has leveraged her expertise in a variety of contexts: she has worked closely with industry groups to proactively assess potential human health risks of emerging chemicals, has served as liaison between technical and non-technical audiences, and has provided technical support to local health agencies and municipalities. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Risk Assessment, Toxicology, Toxic Tort Ms. Boston has assessed the potential for increased risk of carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health outcomes following alleged exposure to a wide variety of chemicals (including but not limited to asbestos, talc, heavy metals, chlorinated solvents, PFAS, microplastics, polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides/herbicides, and various volatile organic compounds) both under regulatory protocols and in the context of litigation. • Los Angeles County, California: Provide technical assistance and expertise to County related to potential human health impacts and public health decisions in the aftermath of the Palisades and Eaton wildfires. • Municipality, Massachusetts. Advised municipality regarding their potential acquisition of a Superfund site (impacted with 1,4-dioxane, Uranium, heavy metals, and other contaminants). Scope includes risk communication with Town officials, residents, and regulators along with a quantitative RAGS style human health risk assessment outlining potential reuse options for the Site. • Industry Group Risk Analysis, Nationally. Performed assessment of potential health risk implications of product formulation shift related to tire-wear and road emissions on behalf of client. Analysis focused on ecological and human health risk of emerging and traditional CONTACT INFORMATION Main: (781) 569-4000 Direct: (781) 569-4028 Email: cboston@rouxinc.com Website: www.rouxinc.com 200 Summit Drive, Suite 500 Burlington, MA 01803 EDUCATION Master of Public Health, Environmental Hazard Assessment and Toxicology, Boston University, School of Public Health, 2019 BA, Geology, Colgate University, 2009 Diplomate of the American Board of Toxicology, 2021 PROFESSIONAL TRAININGS OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 40-Hour Safety Training OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120(e) (8) 8- Hour Refresher Training DOT 49 CFR Hazardous Materials Awareness, Modal and Function- Specific Training MSHA Part 48 Surface Metal/Non-Metal Mine Safety Training Loss Prevention System (LPS) Trained Page 1184 of 1339 Catherine Boston, MPH, DABT | Professional Profile www.rouxinc.com 2 contaminants (including microplastics, 6PPD-Q), complex fate and transport dynamics, and relative source apportionment issues. • Los Angeles County, California. Provided technical assistance to the County related to health risk from landfill operations following community concerns. • Los Angeles County, California. Conducted odor evaluation, health screening evaluation, and complex data analytics assessing temporal and spatial trends to evaluate community concerns regarding landfill emissions related to an elevated temperature event. • Birth Defects Analysis, Hawaii: Expert witness assessing birth defects allegedly stemming from in utero maternal exposures to various chemicals associated with sugarcane burning operations (including PAHs, PM2.5, dioxins and others). • Roundup and PCB Litigation, Nationally. Expert witness for general causation assessing exposure to Roundup and PCBs and the potential to develop Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The opinion is based on integration of multiple lines of scientific evidence including mechanistic data, animal carcinogenicity assays, and human epidemiological data. • PFAS in Papermaking Sludge, Maine. Retained to provide expert witness services for a class action and personal injury suit alleging exposure to PFAS in drinking water related to application of biosolids containing papermaking sludge (both direct application by paper-making industry, and municipal wastewater treatment biosolids containing papermaking sludge). In the process of assessing the client’s relative contribution to observed PFAS impacts and the scientific basis for the health effects alleged by the Plaintiffs. • Large Industrial Client, Nationally. Assist in PFAS MDL cases providing underlying support related to toxicology, epidemiology and derivation of regulatory standards. • Industrial Lagoons, New Jersey. Performed sophisticated statistical analysis using multiple lines of evidence to demonstrate that elevated arsenic levels in upland soil of an industrial facility were attributable to background/fill conditions, not site operations. • City of Napa, Lead Impacts. Evaluated past, current, and future exposure to City personnel training at the Napa Police Department Firing Range (impacts include lead, metals, and petroleum compounds). Developed best management practices for the City to ensure safe practices moving forward, and advised client regarding potential health risk associated with redevelopment work. • Air Modeling, Toxic Tort Case, Louisiana. Assessed potential exposure to Plaintiffs using surface water to air partitioning model and a Gaussian Plume model. Demonstrated that Plaintiff exposure to a volatile compound present in surface water was not occurring. • Multiple PCB Sites, South Boston, Massachusetts. Performed multiple complex Massachusetts Contingency Plan Method 3 Risk Characterizations for high profile redevelopment Sites in the Seaport of Boston. Demonstrated usability of historical data via spatial and statistical analysis. Statistical support helped to guide and streamline redevelopment and remediation efforts. • Prop 65. Litigation, Confidential Client, Japan. Prepared memorandum for a large electronics manufacturer in response to a Notice of Violation of California EPA’s Proposition 65. • Assessment for Compliance with Prop65, Multiple Clients. Advised clients regarding 2018 labeling changes, product sampling and analysis, and evaluation of levels of exposure against Safe Harbor Levels for various consumer and food products. • Tank Car Facility, Ohio. Performed a modified Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGs) human health risk assessment for 160-acre tank car maintenance facility impacted with petroleum hydrocarbons, solvents, and metals. Exposure media of concern included soil, soil gas, indoor air, and groundwater. Evaluated current and future scenarios at various exposure units in accordance with Ohio EPA guidance. Prepared weight of evidence evaluation assessing the potential presence of Chromium VI at the Site in the absence of speciated Chromium data. Identified Remedial Action Objectives (RAOs) and calculated Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs). • Synthetic Turf Exposure, California. Performed data evaluation, and exposure assessment, a toxicity assessment, and risk characterization to evaluate potential child, adult and staff exposures to PAHs and metals detected in synthetic turf via incidental ingestion, dermal contact, and outdoor inhalation for a local municipality. Determined that the cumulative cancer risk and non-cancer hazard estimates for the most sensitive populations did not exceed Cal-EPA target health goals. • Risk Evaluations, California. Performed numerous human health screening evaluations (HHSEs) and human health risk assessments (HHRAs) consistent with Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Health and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) methodology. Prepared statistical evaluations attributing elevated levels of metals to background conditions and evaluated lead contamination using DTSC’s LeadSpread model. Familiarity with derivation of DTSC Screening Levels, and San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs). Page 1185 of 1339 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RFP 26-003 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL PAGE 1 OF 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST Kristen T. Bogue Ms. Bogue is a senior project manager and assists in the preparation of environmental and planning studies, with a focus on due diligence planning activities. Ms. Bogue has experience in the research, analysis, and writing of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)/National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation. Ms. Bogue's project management background includes a variety of projects involving mixed-use, hotel/resort, residential, commercial, redevelopment, infrastructure, and industrial uses for both public and private sector clients. In addition to being a CEQA/NEPA generalist, she specializes in the preparation of hazardous materials studies and visual analysis services. Ms. Bogue has prepared numerous hazardous materials related studies, including Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Phase I Initial Site Assessments for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessments pursuant to CEQA, and Environmental Baseline Surveys for the Department of the Navy. Additionally, she is involved with Visual Impact Assessments in conformance with appropriate agency standards, including the Federal Highway Administration "Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) for Highway Projects," United States Bureau of Land Management guidelines, and California Energy Commission guidelines. Other visual services Ms. Bogue has prepared include photosimulations, shade/shadow studies, viewshed mapping, and light and glare studies. As a specialist in these specific environmental topic areas, Ms. Bogue has extensive experience with projects involving sensitive planning and environmental issues including aesthetics/light and glare, shade/shadow, and hazardous materials considerations. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Aviation Boulevard at Artesia Boulevard Southbound to Westbound Right-Turn Improvement, Manhattan Beach, California. City of Manhattan Beach. Environmental Specialist. Prepared the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Michael Baker provided design and engineering services for the city of Manhattan Beach's Aviation Boulevard at Artesia Boulevard Southbound to Westbound Right-Turn Improvement project, which included roadway widening, pedestrian improvements, and crosswalk striping. Michael Baker completed the environmental document, project report, and plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E). Full-Scale Desalination Facility - Feasibility Study, Los Angeles County, California. West Basin Municipal Water District. Environmental Specialist. Responsible for visual impact analysis. Michael Baker provided engineering, environmental, and regulatory permitting expertise related to the client's overall desalination program, including full-scale desalination plant feasibility and siting studies. Work efforts included regulatory permitting and site constraints assessments for an El Segundo site (co-located with NRG's El Segundo Generating Station), conceptual studies for additional alternative sites, and technical support on lease negotiations with potential site owners. City Wide Sewer Master Plan Project, Seal Beach, California. City of Seal Beach. Project Manager. Responsible in the preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the City of Seal Beach. The City has adopted a City-Wide Sewer Master Plan Update. The project involved the development of multiple Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs) within the City's existing sewer system. The analysis performed included a wide range of potential construction methods, including a pipe-bursting method, a cured-in-place method, and/or a trenching method for pipe rehabilitation/replacement. Specific issues included noise, growth inducing, and air quality impacts associated with project construction. Alamitos Battery Energy Storage System Environmental Services, Long Beach, California. City of Long Beach. Environmental Specialist. Provided visual analysis support services, including the selection of Key Views and assistance in the preparation of photosimulations. Michael Baker assisted the client with the preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and supporting technical analyses for the Alamitos Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) at the existing Alamitos Generating Station in Long Beach. The project included construction of a 300-megawatt battery energy storage facility consisting of three 50-foot-high buildings, similar in appearance to server farms, and constructed within the existing surface parking lot between existing Units 1 through 4 and the switchyard. Park Place Extension EIR/EA, El Segundo, California. City of El Segundo. Environmental Specialist. Prepared the Visual Impact Assessment Checklist. Michael Baker prepared the required National Environmental Policy Act/California Environmental Quality Act (NEPA/CEQA) clearance documentation for the Park Place Extension and Railroad Grade Separation Project. The project involves extending Park Place Years with Michael Baker 21 Years of Experience 21 Education B.A., 2005, Environmental Analysis and Design, University of California, Irvine Professional Affiliations Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) ASTM International (ASTM) Page 1186 of 1339 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RFP 26-003 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL PAGE 2 OF 2 between Allied Way and Nash Street and grade separating the extension from the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway tracks. The environmental analysis thoroughly discussed the existing conditions for each environmental issue area and evaluated the short- and long-term environmental impacts associated with project construction and operation (both individual and cumulative). Key issues associated with the project included hazardous materials, air quality, noise, land use/right of way impacts, and traffic and circulation. 20th Street/Walnut Avenue/Alamitos Avenue Intersection Improvements – NEPA Compliance, Long Beach, California. City of Long Beach. Environmental Specialist. Prepared the Phase I Initial Site Assessment. Michael Baker assisted with preparation of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance documentation for the 20th Street/Walnut Avenue/Alamitos Avenue Intersection Improvement Project, in the southern/central portion of the city. A small portion also extended into the southern portion of the City of Signal Hill. It involved construction of a new four-way signalized intersection, which included the realignment of Alamitos Avenue, removal of a diagonal portion of East 20th Street, and realignment of East Wesley Drive. In consultation with city staff, Michael Baker processed NEPA clearance documentation through Caltrans District 7, including the preparation of several technical studies for a categorical exclusion (CE) document. Scout House Cultural Resources Identification Study, Manhattan Beach, California. City of Manhattan Beach. Project Manager. Assisted in the preparation of the environmental documentation. Michael Baker is assisting the client with technical studies to support an appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) determination, which is anticipated to be a Class 32 categorial exemption for the proposed Scout House Project located in Manhattan Beach, California. The proposed project involves the demolition of the existing Scout House building and the construction of a new Scout House building with two floors consisting of kitchens, meeting rooms, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)- compliant restrooms, storage rooms, and an outdoor covered patio seating area. Michael Baker is also conducting reports in support of the project, including a parking study and a cultural resources identification study. Long Beach Municipal Urban Stormwater Project Environmental Services, Long Beach, California. City of Long Beach. Senior Environmental Scientist. Prepared the hazardous materials analysis to support the environmental document. Michael Baker assisted the client with preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Long Beach Municipal Urban Stormwater Treatment Project. Key issues addressed within the IS/MND include air quality impacts, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, hazards and hazardous materials, biological and cultural resources. CT Warehouse, Carson, California. City of Carson. Project Manager. Served as Project Manager and assisted in the preparation of the environmental documentation. Michael Baker prepared an initial study/mitigated negative declaration for the CT Warehouse Project. The proposed project involved the demolition of a former salvage yard and two residential dwellings, along with associated ancillary structures, to allow for the construction of a new 145,840-square-foot warehouse facility with surface parking and landscaping. The facility was designed to accommodate distribution, warehousing, and manufacturing uses, along with supporting office space. County-Wide Long-Term Routine Maintenance Permitting Program, Orange County, California. Orange County Flood Control District. Environmental Analyst. Responsible for the preparation of an IS/MND for the Orange County Flood Control District. The project would allow routine maintenance to occur within multiple existing flood control facilities, and beneath existing bridges crossing over waterways, located throughout the County of Orange. Flood control maintenance activities would include channel maintenance (i.e., cleaning, silt removal, slope maintenance/repair), landscape maintenance and vegetation control/removal, insect/rodent control, rip-rap installation and repair, structural inspection/cleaning, installation of storm drain pipes and underdrains, fabrication and installation of headwalls, removal/replacement of concrete lining, and the repair and backfill of washouts. River Avenue Storm Drain Improvements IS/MND/EA, Long Beach, California. City of Long Beach. Project Coordinator. Prepared the Mitigated Negative Declaration for proposed storm drain improvements along River Avenue. Michael Baker prepared the CEQA documentation for the River Avenue Storm Drain Improvements project for the City of Long Beach. The project proposed approximately 1,800 linear feet of improvements along the River Avenue storm drain system, located from the intersection of Wardlow Road and River Avenue to the Southern California Edison (SCE) easement, south of Arlington Street. The inadequate River Avenue drainage system has resulted in flooding to adjacent residents. The project proposes to bring the flood protection in this area to a full 10-year protection level. The project would construct a parallel storm drain system along River Avenue. A detention basin (proposed at the SCE easement) would temporarily hold two acre-feet of stormwater during heavy flows and then release the flows as the storm abates. Star Express Car Wash Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Long Beach, California. City of Long Beach. Environmental Specialist. Conducted quality control review of the environmental documentation. Michael Baker assisted the city of Long Beach with the preparation of an initial study/mitigated negative declaration for the Star Express Car Wash Project located at 1911 Pacific Coast Highway. The project demolished an on-site restaurant and associated surface parking lot to construct a staffed, automated express car wash facility. Michael Baker prepared technical studies and analyses pertaining to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, energy, noise, and cultural and paleontological resources. The team also conducted a peer review of an applicant-provided traffic memo. Page 1187 of 1339 36 Robert Menald, CAC, CMI, LRCIA, LRCPM, CIEC Page 1 Professional Summary Professional Qualifications Education Professional Activities Relevant Experience Mr. Menald has worked in the environmental field since 2002. He currently provides management of all staff in Southern and Northern California. His project experience includes conducting and reviewing asbestos, lead, mold, indoor air quality and hazardous materials surveys/inspections and investigations; monitoring and managing asbestos, lead, mold and hazardous materials abatement and remediation activities; and preparing and reviewing technical reports, work plans and job specifications. California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Certified Asbestos Consultant (Certification #08-4323) Nevada Occupational Health and Safety Administration Licensed Asbestos Abatement Consultant (Certification #IJPM 1745) Illinois Department of Public Health Asbestos Professional – Project Manager (Certification #100-19413) New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Asbestos Inspector, Management Planner and Project Designer (Certification #000451) California Department of Public Health Certified Lead Inspector/Assessor and Project Monitor (Certification #LRC-00005259 and LRC-00005260) American Council for Accredit Certification Council-certified Indoor Environmental Consultant (Certification #0605048) American Bio-Recovery Association Bio-Recovery Technician (Certification #A01045) Certified Microbial Inspector (Certification #80849) OSHA 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations Training AHERA Accredited Asbestos Inspector, Management Planner, Project Designer and Abatement Contractor/Supervisor NIOSH 582 Sampling and Evaluating Airborne Dust Training Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (HSPA-12) Tier 1 Credentials California State University, Fullerton, Bachelor of Arts Degree Member of Environmental Information Association Member of Indoor Air Quality Association Member of Bio-Recovery Association Hazardous Materials Survey and Abatement Management. Managed projects that consisted of hazardous materials surveys and abatement management for several buildings scheduled for demolition. The surveys consisted of inspection, assessment and sampling for asbestos and lead-based paint and preparing survey reports. The abatement management included preparing specifications, monitoring abatement activities, conducting clearance inspections and sampling, and preparing close-out reports and documentation. Highlights Industrial hygiene and environmental services experience in both private and public sectors. Asbestos, Lead and Microbial Certifications Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. 888-948-4826 714-871-87121521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831 Page 1188 of 1339 37 Robert Menald, CAC, CMI, CLIA, CLPM, CIEC Page 2 Mold Investigation and Remediation Management and Oversight. Performed mold investigations and remediation management and oversight at numerous buildings. Investigations included visual inspections, moisture mapping, bulk sample collection, interpretation of analytical results, and report preparation. Remediation management and oversight included work plan preparation, contractor oversight, collection of post-remediation bulk and/or air samples, interpretation of analytical results, and report preparation. Indoor Air Quality Services. Performed indoor air quality investigations at numerous sites throughout California. Investigations included visual inspections, collection of indoor air quality measurements, bulk and/or air samples collection, interpretation of findings and analytical results, and report preparation. Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) Sampling. LAUSD, On-Call Environmental Assessment Contract, Various Sites, Los Angeles, California As a subcontractor to Terraphase, TES provides CIH consultation during health and safety plan development. Terraphase/TES field teams sample various building materials with Los Angeles to assess PCB content of materials in support of planning for appropriate waste management and disposal during future demolition activities. As project team leader, performed visual inspections, collection of PCBs bulk samples, reviewed and interpreted laboratory data at various LAUSD schools including, but not limited to, Calabash Charter Academy and Yorkdale Elementary School. BPAS for Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Pre-Alteration Assessment, IH Surveillance and Air Monitoring Services” Federal Building Throughout the Counties of Los Angeles and Orange, CA. BPA No. 47PK1721A0006 Mr. Menald provides project management for various asbestos and lead projects performed at the Chet Holifield Federal Building, Wilshire Federal Building, 300 North Los Angeles Federal Building, Richard H. Chambers, U.S. Court of Appeals, Roybal Federal Building, Spring Street Courthouse, Glenn M. Anderson Federal Building, Ronald Reagan Federal Building, Santa Ana Federal Building, James C. Corman Federal Building and Huntington Park SSA Federal Building from 2016 to present. Asbestos and lead surveys included collection of asbestos bulk PLM samples, onsite XRF readings, and collection of bulk lead paint chip samples, followed by bulk sample submittal to an accredited laboratory for analysis, review of laboratory analytical reports, and preparation of survey reports. Asbestos abatement monitoring included on-site observation monitoring of asbestos abatement activities and clearance inspection of the asbestos work areas after abatement activities were complete to evaluate presence of visible asbestos dust/ debris. Clearance of PCM air sampling of the asbestos work areas was performed, and analysis on-site and/or submittal of PCM samples were sent to an accredited laboratory for analysis, followed by preparation of monitoring reports. TES also kept and prepared daily observation logs of all asbestos abatement activities, alongside daily PCM air monitoring throughout the project’s entirety. Additionally, TEM air, microvac/wipe sampling with visual inspection of the project area, TEM ambient air, and surface dust microvac/wipe sampling was completed. All samples were submitted to an accredited laboratory for analysis, and review/preparation of the assessment reports. Industrial Hygiene Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. 888-948-4826 714-871-87121521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831 Page 1189 of 1339 PROFESSIONAL PROFILE 1 Nancy Anglin, PE, ENV SP Principal Engineer | Operations Manager EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Over 30 years of experience in environmental engineering and technical leadership for public- and private-sector clients. Extensive background in contaminated site investigation, environmental due diligence, waste management planning, regulatory coordination, and large infrastructure project support, including direct experience working for multiple Southern California cities, Counties, and agencies on similar scopes of work. Representative cities include Burbank, Carson, City of Industry, Irvine, Laguna Beach, Los Angeles, Santa Ana, Torrance, Whittier, and others. Direct experience working the County of Los Angeles Fire Department Site Mitigation Unit (SMU), Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC), California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), South Coast Air Quality Management District, and other local agencies. TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES Evaluation of contaminated properties and construction projects for environmental liability, waste management, and worker safety; preparation of soil, groundwater, and waste management plans; development of bid plans and specifications; RFI support; and assistance with implementation of grant-funded projects. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS On-Call Services for the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works; Helen Keller Park; Los Angeles, CA. Principal-in-Charge for multiple awards of on-call environmental services contracts. One representative project included redevelopment of a former dump site discovered under a park. Acted as liaison between the County and the numerous regulatory oversight agencies (various county agencies, Local Enforcement Agency, RWQCB, CalRecycle, DTSC, SCAQMD). Managed a large team of staff with diverse expertise to address the many issues associated with the park remodeling project (historic landfill, Solid Waste Assessment Test [SWAT] analysis, Phase I ESA, methane mitigation design, hazardous building materials, geotechnical, etc.), and supported the County with technical input for its public outreach. A key aspect of the project's success was the team's ability to obtain regulatory agreement of legal interpretations to allow asbestos to remain buried on site. Southern California Regional Rail Authority Contractor, Keller Yard Layover Facility Project, Los Angeles, CA. Project Manager for environmental support of a rail yard expansion near Union Station. The site was located on a former manufactured gas plant subject (MGP) to a DTSC land covenant. Prepared a comprehensive Environmental Management Plan, including SWPPP, SMP, HASP, dust and noise control, and SCAQMD Rules 403, 404, and 1166 compliance plans; and provided experienced environmental monitors to conduct XRF, PID soil screening, and perimeter air monitoring in compliance with DTSC requirements. Burbank Water and Power (BWP), Campus Stormwater Improvement Project, Burbank, CA. Served as Principal-in-Charge for Roux’s construction monitoring support provided to the Prime Contractor on behalf of the City of Burbank for the BWP Campus Stormwater Improvement Project. The project involved construction of on-site and off-site stormwater improvements to meet regional, state, and federal water quality standards, including separation of on- and off-site drainage, aquifer recharge, and improvements to the Burbank Western Channel discharge connection. Oversaw preparation and implementation of a Soil Management Plan addressing residual impacts from historical site uses, coordinated earthwork monitoring in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1166, and supervised soil screening using PID instrumentation during excavation. Approximately 7,150 cubic yards of soil were managed and removed prior to completion of storm drain construction activities. CONTACT INFORMATION Main: (310) 879-4900 Direct: (562 8646-446) Email: nanglin@rouxinc.com Website: www.rouxinc.com 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway Suite 450, Long Beach, CA 90804 EDUCATION BS, Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada, May 1993 Graduate Studies, Civil Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Canada PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Professional Engineer, No. C94772 (California) Qualified Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Developer (QSD) Envision Sustainability Professional (ENV SP) National Registry of Environmental Professionals, Registered Environmental Manager (REM) and Certified Waste Management Professional (CWMP) Page 1190 of 1339 Nancy Anglin, PE, ENV SP | Professional Profile www.rouxinc.com 2 On-Call Services for the Orange County Great Park; City of Irvine; Irvine, CA. Principal-in-Charge for on-call environmental services for the Orange County Great Park. Marine Corps Air Station El Toro was transformed into the Orange County Great Park in the geographic center of Orange County. An area spanning ~4,600 acres, the Great Park master plan includes recreation areas, competitive sports facilities, and parkland; preserves the environment and Orange County's agricultural heritage; and honors the military history of the former air base. As contract manager and principal-in-charge, Ms. Anglin led services including regulatory interpretation; performance of health and safety evaluations; and identification, abatement, remediation, or legal disposal of contaminated soil, lead-based paint, asbestos-containing materials, USTs, drums, wastes, pipelines, and other materials that were used, abandoned, and not documented at a military facility of this type and vintage. Water Tank Ravine Burn Site Remediation; City of Laguna Beach; Laguna Beach, CA. Task lead for the remediation and restoration of a historical burn site containing hazardous levels of metals in a steep sloped ravine located in a designated open space area. Services included background review, comprehensive site assessment, waste profiling, remedial action plan preparation (including a waste management plan, field sampling and analysis plan, quality assurance/quality control plan, and site health and community health and safety plan), waste removal oversight, human health risk evaluation, background study, and removal action completion reporting. Ms. Anglin's role on this project included managing the team to address the issues associated with the waste removal project and coordinating with the city (client). City of Fullerton, Environmental Support, Raymond Avenue Grade Separation, Fullerton, CA. Contract manager, led the environmental support for this grade separation project in Fullerton intersecting BNSF railroad right-of-way (R/W). The project started with Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), when Evaluated possible site contamination issues associated with parcel acquisition and provided remediation bid specifications and estimates of remediation costs to be set aside in an escrow account. For the City of Fullerton, under the direction of the Construction Manager (CM), Ms. Anglin’s team provided environmental construction support including RFI response, site sampling, interpretation of waste types, and waste profiling. Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), Airfield Terminal Modernization Project (ATMP), Environmental Compliance Reviews, Los Angeles, CA. Ms. Anglin acted as contract manager for a Prime under a LAWA on-call A&E contract. Her team conducted environmental compliance reviews for the LAWA ATMP. The purpose of this project was to ensure continued compliance with federal, state, and local environmental regulations as the architect completes the design for LAWA's ATMP. To ensure compliance, the team conducted thorough reviews of all relevant documents and files such as project design documents; California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents; historical resource reports; and LAWA's design, construction, and sustainability guidance documents. The team made appropriate findings and recommendations based on reviews and presented those to the client to aid its further planning and decision- making processes. Various Clients, Caltrans Environmental Support, Southern CA. As Project Manager and Contract Manager, Ms. Anglin has over 20 years of experience working as a consultant to Caltrans or to cities and agencies that are performing construction activities in Caltrans R/W or under Caltrans management/oversight. As a former contract and task manager for four as-needed contracts with Caltrans, Ms. Anglin understands their processes. Projects included initial site assessments (ISAs); SIs, ADL surveys, methane and hydrogen sulfide evaluations, and investigations comparing surface and groundwater properties; and preparing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit applications for proposed construction dewatering projects. LA Metro I-5 North County Enhancement Project (NCEP), Los Angeles County, CA. Principal-in-Charge of a team that provided support to LA Metro for a $500 million enhancement project along a 16- mile stretch of a Southern California Interstate. Project tasks included working as the client’s site representative; confirming contractor compliance with the project SWPPP and other environmental documents; performing weekly SWPPP BMP inspections; reviewing contractor environmental submittals; responding to RFIs; and interpreting regulations. PROFESSIONAL TRAININGS OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER/Annual 8-Hr Refresher OSHA 8-Hour HAZWOPER Supervisor Training OSHA 24-Hour First Responder Operations Level OSHA Excavation Competent Person Certification Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) California Hazardous Waste Classification Confined Space Entry First Aid, CPR/ AED PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure Women’s Transportation Seminar (WTS) International Page 1191 of 1339 PROFESSIONAL PROFILE 1 Jay M. Shipley, PE National Director of Public Sector & Industrial Services Principal Engineer EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Mr. Shipley is a client-focused, senior-level executive with over twenty-five years of proven leadership in the global environmental design and consulting market. He creates and implements business growth strategies through investments in people, practices, and clients. Mr. Shipley understands the nuances of the environmental market locally and nationally, as well as how to successfully collaborate and execute integrated projects on a global scale. He has a track record of success managing large groups of professionals, leading global account programs, developing and executing strategic plans, and delivering results. TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES Mr. Shipley’s technical experience covers a broad spectrum of environmental consulting activities including designing, installing, and operating soil and groundwater treatment systems employing various remedial technologies including high vacuum and dual-phase extraction, carbon adsorption, thermal and catalytic oxidation, air sparging, in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO), and advanced oxidation. In addition, Mr. Shipley has directed or managed hundreds of groundwater and soil contamination projects. He has been involved in numerous large acquisitions and due diligence efforts, as well as supporting contractual negotiations to manage environmental liabilities. He has also managed soil and groundwater investigation/remediation projects for private sector and public sector clients; performed pilot studies for soil vapor extraction (SVE), air sparging, landfill gas recovery, and groundwater and wastewater treatment systems; prepared and reviewed technical reports, proposals, and bid packages; and worked as a corrosion engineer designing, installing, and testing cathodic protection systems. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS • Director, U.S. Municipal Sector for the Arcadis' Environmental Business Line, responsible for the growth and strategy of the environmental municipal market within the greater United States. Specific achievements include: o Established a strategic plan and structure for US municipal market. o Managed winning strategy and pursuit of $1.5 million Green Business contract with major LA municipal agency. This was the first ever environmental award for Arcadis. o Led winning pursuit of two separate three-year/$15 million on-call contracts with the City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks (LARAP). o Led five-year, $75 million winning pursuit for major urban transportation agency to manage environmental construction services. o Prepared the strategy for a muti-year, multi-million-dollar environmental contract with the State of Florida. o Team leader for large contract wins for the City of Chicago and Chicago Metra. • Program Manager for a $20 million urban redevelopment project consisting of a contaminated industrial property located adjacent to the Los Angeles River and in an underserved community. The Site had been used for various industrial purposes since about 1910 and included several structures, underground storage tanks, and areas of subsurface contamination. Worked closely with stakeholders and regulatory agencies to develop a comprehensive assessment and remediation plan for the Site that aligned with the ultimate use of the Site as a community park. CONTACT INFORMATION Main: (310 0049-879) Direct: (562) 446-8642 Email: jshipley@rouxinc.com Website: www.rouxinc.com 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway Suite 450 Long Beach, CA 90804 EDUCATION MBA, University of Redlands, 2001 BS, Chemical Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, 1998 Page 1192 of 1339 Jay M. Shipley, PE | Professional Profile www.rouxinc.com 2 • Global Client Executive for a $115 billion multinational conglomerate consisting of 13 major companies employing over 130,000 people in 70+ countries. Responsible for overall account leadership and growth across three global business lines. Assumed responsibility for the client after multiple years of client dissatisfaction and decreasing revenue. Major accomplishments include developing and implementing plans to stabilize revenue and eliminate project losses, securing position as one of two global suppliers for the most technically challenging projects, and increasing revenue by over 20%. • Global Account Manager for a $800 million multinational industrial company. Organized and managed national and global teams to execute projects across multiple services including due diligence, property condition evaluations, compliance, and assessment and remediation. High-level involvement with C-level executives as a part of corporate acquisition strategy team. Maintained involvement with key technical elements of most projects, directed overall project strategy and technical approach, and guided agency discussions and negotiations. Mr. Shipley's contributions resulted in growing the client from one project in the US, to over 100 projects nationwide. In addition, Mr. Shipley expanded the service offerings to include ISO 14001 audits, compliance (air, water, safety), asbestos surveys, and due diligence support for global acquisitions. Mr. Shipley was also directly involved with securing and expanding work at several sites in Brazil. • Project Manager/Design Engineer for assessment and remediation activities at a metal processing/heat treating facility, responsible for designing and installing multiple SVE systems to address volatile organic compound (VOC) contamination at separate areas of the Site. Also designed, installed, and operated a permanganate injection pilot study for groundwater. The Site is currently being evaluated for soil closure. • Project Manager/Design Engineer for a remediation system to remove free product and reduce concentrations of benzene and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) in groundwater. The system consists of nine vapor extraction wells and seven air sparge wells connected to a thermal/catalytic oxidation system and an air sparge compressor, respectively. Design, permitting, and construction activities were complicated due to location within the right-of-way of a major freeway. • Project Manager for expedited site assessment and subsequent remediation at a biopharmaceutical manufacturing facility. Chlorinated solvents migrated into the subsurface via a leaking wastewater collection system. Impacted soil was remediated using a combination of excavation and soil vapor extraction. Upfront design, permitting, and procurement activities were completed in less than three weeks; field work had to be completed in one week to coincide with the plant's annual shutdown for major maintenance. • Lead Engineer responsible for designing and permitting a landfill gas collection, treatment, and monitoring system consisting of 20 gas extraction wells, collection header, vapor extraction blower unit, and vapor treatment unit. On-site buildings were constructed on a vapor barrier and outfitted with methane gas sensors and a gas monitoring network. • Project Manager/Engineer for a study to evaluate handling and storage practices of potentially hazardous blast grit material at a Department of Defense (DOD) ship repair facility. Duties included reviewing applicable regulations, preparing conceptual engineering design and specifications for a planned hazardous waste storage facility, and making recommendations regarding current grit handling and storage practices. • Project Manager working with the Army Corps of Engineers on preliminary site investigation projects to determine the existence of contamination resulting from DOD activities. Duties included management of day-to-day operations, client interaction, budget preparation, field work supervision, subcontractor scheduling, and final report preparation. • Engineer-in -charge of the operation and field engineering of a methane collection system consisting of six separate vapor extraction systems and 82 extraction wells. Duties included managing day-to-day operations, supervising field technicians, equipment modifications, data collection and interpretation, and instrumentation calibration. • Project Engineer for an ex situ vapor extraction/thermal oxidation project to remediate over 8,000 cubic yards of gasoline- contaminated soil excavated from a pipeline leak. Duties included engineering design, permitting, construction management, start-up, and system operation. • Designed and installed cathodic protection systems and related devices for underground storage tanks, aboveground storage tanks, pipelines, and water treatment facilities. Conducted field surveys, analyzed data collected during surveys, and prepared written reports based on the data. Additional responsibilities included preparing job bid packages, responding to requests for quotations, sales and business development, and managing existing clients. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Professional Chemical Engineer: California, No. CA04779 NACE Certified Cathodic Protection Specialist 40-Hour OSHA Training per zo CFR 1910.120 Page 1193 of 1339 PROFESSIONAL PROFILE 1 David DeVries, PG, CHg Senior Hydrogeologist EXPERIENCE SUMMARY David DeVries is a Senior Hydrogeologist with more than 32 years of experience leading environmental investigation and remediation programs throughout Southern California. His expertise includes developing scopes of work, negotiating contracts, executing complex projects, and overseeing regulatory compliance. He has managed multidisciplinary teams, coordinated with multiple stakeholders and agencies, and delivered large-scale, multi-site programs for both public agencies and private corporations. David’s technical background includes RI/FS projects; long-term monitoring; remedial design and implementation; Phase I/II ESAs; UST upgrades and closures; geophysical surveys; dewatering system design; and soil and groundwater remediation involving contaminants such as metals, VOCs, 1,4-dioxane, and hexavalent chromium. TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES Environmental hydrogeology; managing large subsurface investigation and remediation programs for public agencies and private corporations; managing large projects involving complex contaminants in soil and groundwater (e.g., metals, volatile organics, 1,4-dioxane, and hexavalent chromium). REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS OCPW, El Modena–Irvine Channel Enhanced Maintenance Project - North Tustin, CA. Managed the Project soil investigation, remediation design, and regulatory compliance oversight. Work included conducting targeted subsurface investigations to delineate petroleum‑impacted soils, developing a mitigation workplan integrating a low‑permeability geosynthetic clay liner system, and coordinating regulatory review with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, culminating in the successful mitigation of hydrocarbon migration risk and restoration of the channel. Brownfield Redevelopment – Anaheim, CA. Project Manager for the environmental scope supporting the residential redevelopment of a 7-acre former mixed-use property. Led soil, soil vapor, and groundwater investigations under a DTSC voluntary cleanup agreement. Prepared a PEA-Equivalent Report and final Remedial Action Workplan proposing vapor barrier systems beneath planned structures. Achieved DTSC approval, enabling project construction. Soil & Groundwater Remediation – Ricoh Electronics, Irvine, CA. Managed investigation and remediation addressing PCE impacts at a major manufacturing facility. Directed subsurface assessment, 24-hour aquifer testing, multi-zone groundwater well installation, and regulatory coordination with the Santa Ana RWQCB. Developed a remedial action plan involving excavation of 2,000 cubic yards of impacted soil and carbon-absorption groundwater treatment while maintaining facility operations. Property Transfer Remediation – Confidential Insurance Company, Irvine, CA. Led comprehensive characterization of soil, soil vapor, and groundwater impacts at a former electronics manufacturing site. Designed and implemented aboveground and in-situ remediation systems, oversaw construction and monitoring, and achieved regulatory closure with DTSC, RWQCB, and federal agencies. Katella Beautification Project – City of Anaheim, CA. Managed utility excavations involving contaminated soils and hazardous waste. Oversaw subcontractors, conducted soil sampling, assessed abandoned piping, and facilitated removal of asbestos-containing material. Effective coordination allowed construction activities to proceed without schedule delays. CONTACT INFORMATION Main (: 310 4900-879 ) Direct: (562) 446-8625 Email: ddevries@rouxinc.com Website: www.rouxinc.com 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway Suite 450 Long Beach, CA 90804 EDUCATION BS, Geology. Western Michigan University, Michigan, 1989 29CFR 1910.120 OSHA Hazwoper 40-Hr/8-Hr Refresher PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Certified Hydrogeologist (C.Hg.), No.594, CA, 1998 Certified Professional Geologist, No. 6313, State: CA, 1995 PUBLICATIONS Co-author, Bench-scale biodegradation tests to assess natural attenuation potential of 1,4-dioxane at three California sites., Bioremediation, 2015, Biodegradation of 1,4-dioxan Page 1194 of 1339 David DeVries, PG, CHg | Professional Profile www.rouxinc.com 2 Rail to River Project - Corridor Segment A, Additional Environmental Assessment, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA. Project manager of field operations and reporting for the installation of 119 hand auger bores along the 6.5-mile alignment. The scope of work includes advancing each bore to 5-feet below ground surface and collection of four samples per bore. Soil samples were analyzed for multiple parameters to assess for contaminants typically found along railroad lines and specific samples were selected for potential point source contaminates based on adjacent properties identified during previous due diligence investigations. Daily draft tech memo reports were provided to Metro and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) as the laboratory data became available, allowing collaboration and modifications concerning supplemental laboratory analyses. Engineering and Environmental Services On-Call Contract - Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (METRO), Various Locations, CA. Project Manager. On-call environmental services as sole source consultant were provided at 35 METRO sites throughout the greater Los Angeles area, including water sampling and air monitoring. Responsible for the contract, which involved 69 soil and groundwater site investigations and consulting projects associated with proposed rail line expansions, bus and train terminals, and subway tunnel groundwater monitoring. Management of this contract included working with METRO staff on scope-of-work planning and development Cost and Schedule Proposal (CSP) preparation or review of CSPs prepared by task managers, contract negotiations with the METRO Contracts Department and subcontractors, and monthly status reports of project budgets vs. scope completion, project closeout, and project auditing. Result: " …We at the MTA greatly appreciate the professional services provided to our organization by the AMEC (as Harding ESE) team….AMEC (as Harding ESE) has demonstrated the ability to provide excellent environmental consulting services on multiple projects.” -- Kathleen Sweet, MTA Environmental Specialist, Timothy Lindholm, MTA Environmental Specialist Percolation Ponds Hydrogeological Investigation - ExxonMobil Production Company Hill Property (South Belridge Oilfield), South Bell Ridge Oilfield, CA. Project Manager. Environmental services for a two-year hydrogeologic investigation and evaluation of Hill leased property (approximately 480 acres within an oilfield on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley) to assess potential impacts to underlying groundwater throughout the site from operation of infiltration ponds related to oilfield production activities. Included drilling and construction of groundwater monitoring wells, groundwater sampling, and sampling of 4 unlined surface impoundment ponds covering approximately 17.5 acres receiving approximately 4,300 bpd (180,000 gpd) of wastewater discharged to the impoundments for disposal by solar evaporation and percolation. Responsible for principal review, and communications with client regarding deliverables. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study - Monsanto Chemical Company, Chemical Manufacturing Facility, Long Beach, CA. Managed a California State Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) RI/FS. Work involved characterization of soil and groundwater contaminated with benzene and arsenic, quarterly groundwater monitoring, preparation of RI work plan documents, and agency interaction. Also managed aquifer step drawdown and subsequent 72- hour constant-rate aquifer pump test using a remedial extraction well. Results of the test were analyzed using the program AQTESOLV. Soil Investigation/Remediation - Home Depot U.S.A., Development Site, Los Angeles, CA. Project Manager. Managed the investigation and remediation of solvent-impacted soils during construction of a new Home Depot outlet. Planned and implemented an RI/FS. Work involved initial borings and soil sample analyses to assess the vertical and horizontal area of impact. Work also included determining soil cleanup levels by implementing attenuation factor equations from the Los Angeles RWQCB guidance document. Also coordinated and provided oversight of a 40-foot-deep sloped excavation for the removal of 7,000 cubic yards of soil, sample collection and onsite analyses during the entire excavation, and oversight and coordination of transportation and treatment of soil. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment - Viertel’s Towing Property, 500 Center Avenue, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA. Project manager of field operations and reporting for the drilling of and sampling from soil bores to assess contaminants prior to Metro’s acquisition of the property. The scope of work includes the installation of multi-nested soil vapor probes and collection and analysis of soil, soil vapor, groundwater, and indoor air samples. Project management tasks also include collaboration and communications with the DTSC, Metro, and communications with the current property owner. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment - Natural Gas Line Relocation Assessment, 9225 Aviation Boulevard, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA. Project manager of field operations and reporting for the drilling of and sampling from soil bores to assess contaminants prior to Southern California Gas Company’s (SCGs) relocation of two 30-inch diameter gas lines. The scope of work includes collection and analysis of soil samples from four borings adjacent to the current gas lines in the proposed area of their proposed relocation. Project management tasks also include collaboration and communications with SCG, Metro, and communications with the current property owner (Hertz). PUBLICATIONS Co-author, Bench-scale biodegradation tests to assess natural attenuation potential of 1,4-dioxane at three California sites., Bioremediation, 2015, Biodegradation of 1,4-dioxan Page 1195 of 1339 PROFESSIONAL PROFILE 1 Catherine Boston, MPH, DABT National Director of Human Health Risk Services Vice President | Principal Scientist | Risk Assessor EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Ms. Boston is a board-certified toxicologist with over fourteen years of experience: Roux (2009– Present); Island Creek Oysters (2005–2009). TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES Ms. Boston’s career has focused on the assessment of human health and environmental hazards. Her multidisciplinary training in geology, human health risk assessment and toxicology provides full- spectrum support for remedial investigations, environmental litigation, and risk communication. Ms. Boston’s areas of expertise include: • Human health risk assessment • Exposure assessment • Toxicological evaluations • Toxic tort evaluations • California’s Proposition 65 evaluations • Site investigation and remediation • Allocation of environmental hazard contribution • Statistical data analysis, including ProUCL, SAS, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and R. Ms. Boston’s work in toxicology and human health risk includes emerging contaminants, quantitative risk assessment, exposure assessments, and interpretation, critique, and analysis of epidemiological and toxicological evaluations. Ms. Boston has experience weaving together multiple lines of evidence to help fully understand general causation issues in toxic tort matters. Ms. Boston has leveraged her expertise in a variety of contexts: she has worked closely with industry groups to proactively assess potential human health risks of emerging chemicals, has served as liaison between technical and non-technical audiences, and has provided technical support to local health agencies and municipalities. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Risk Assessment, Toxicology, Toxic Tort Ms. Boston has assessed the potential for increased risk of carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health outcomes following alleged exposure to a wide variety of chemicals (including but not limited to asbestos, talc, heavy metals, chlorinated solvents, PFAS, microplastics, polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides/herbicides, and various volatile organic compounds) both under regulatory protocols and in the context of litigation. • Los Angeles County, California: Provide technical assistance and expertise to County related to potential human health impacts and public health decisions in the aftermath of the Palisades and Eaton wildfires. • Municipality, Massachusetts. Advised municipality regarding their potential acquisition of a Superfund site (impacted with 1,4-dioxane, Uranium, heavy metals, and other contaminants). Scope includes risk communication with Town officials, residents, and regulators along with a quantitative RAGS style human health risk assessment outlining potential reuse options for the Site. • Industry Group Risk Analysis, Nationally. Performed assessment of potential health risk implications of product formulation shift related to tire-wear and road emissions on behalf of client. Analysis focused on ecological and human health risk of emerging and traditional CONTACT INFORMATION Main: (781) 569-4000 Direct: (781) 569-4028 Email: cboston@rouxinc.com Website: www.rouxinc.com 200 Summit Drive, Suite 500 Burlington, MA 01803 EDUCATION Master of Public Health, Environmental Hazard Assessment and Toxicology, Boston University, School of Public Health, 2019 BA, Geology, Colgate University, 2009 Diplomate of the American Board of Toxicology, 2021 PROFESSIONAL TRAININGS OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 40-Hour Safety Training OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120(e) (8) 8- Hour Refresher Training DOT 49 CFR Hazardous Materials Awareness, Modal and Function- Specific Training MSHA Part 48 Surface Metal/Non-Metal Mine Safety Training Loss Prevention System (LPS) Trained Page 1196 of 1339 Catherine Boston, MPH, DABT | Professional Profile www.rouxinc.com 2 contaminants (including microplastics, 6PPD-Q), complex fate and transport dynamics, and relative source apportionment issues. • Los Angeles County, California. Provided technical assistance to the County related to health risk from landfill operations following community concerns. • Los Angeles County, California. Conducted odor evaluation, health screening evaluation, and complex data analytics assessing temporal and spatial trends to evaluate community concerns regarding landfill emissions related to an elevated temperature event. • Birth Defects Analysis, Hawaii: Expert witness assessing birth defects allegedly stemming from in utero maternal exposures to various chemicals associated with sugarcane burning operations (including PAHs, PM2.5, dioxins and others). • Roundup and PCB Litigation, Nationally. Expert witness for general causation assessing exposure to Roundup and PCBs and the potential to develop Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The opinion is based on integration of multiple lines of scientific evidence including mechanistic data, animal carcinogenicity assays, and human epidemiological data. • PFAS in Papermaking Sludge, Maine. Retained to provide expert witness services for a class action and personal injury suit alleging exposure to PFAS in drinking water related to application of biosolids containing papermaking sludge (both direct application by paper-making industry, and municipal wastewater treatment biosolids containing papermaking sludge). In the process of assessing the client’s relative contribution to observed PFAS impacts and the scientific basis for the health effects alleged by the Plaintiffs. • Large Industrial Client, Nationally. Assist in PFAS MDL cases providing underlying support related to toxicology, epidemiology and derivation of regulatory standards. • Industrial Lagoons, New Jersey. Performed sophisticated statistical analysis using multiple lines of evidence to demonstrate that elevated arsenic levels in upland soil of an industrial facility were attributable to background/fill conditions, not site operations. • City of Napa, Lead Impacts. Evaluated past, current, and future exposure to City personnel training at the Napa Police Department Firing Range (impacts include lead, metals, and petroleum compounds). Developed best management practices for the City to ensure safe practices moving forward, and advised client regarding potential health risk associated with redevelopment work. • Air Modeling, Toxic Tort Case, Louisiana. Assessed potential exposure to Plaintiffs using surface water to air partitioning model and a Gaussian Plume model. Demonstrated that Plaintiff exposure to a volatile compound present in surface water was not occurring. • Multiple PCB Sites, South Boston, Massachusetts. Performed multiple complex Massachusetts Contingency Plan Method 3 Risk Characterizations for high profile redevelopment Sites in the Seaport of Boston. Demonstrated usability of historical data via spatial and statistical analysis. Statistical support helped to guide and streamline redevelopment and remediation efforts. • Prop 65. Litigation, Confidential Client, Japan. Prepared memorandum for a large electronics manufacturer in response to a Notice of Violation of California EPA’s Proposition 65. • Assessment for Compliance with Prop65, Multiple Clients. Advised clients regarding 2018 labeling changes, product sampling and analysis, and evaluation of levels of exposure against Safe Harbor Levels for various consumer and food products. • Tank Car Facility, Ohio. Performed a modified Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGs) human health risk assessment for 160-acre tank car maintenance facility impacted with petroleum hydrocarbons, solvents, and metals. Exposure media of concern included soil, soil gas, indoor air, and groundwater. Evaluated current and future scenarios at various exposure units in accordance with Ohio EPA guidance. Prepared weight of evidence evaluation assessing the potential presence of Chromium VI at the Site in the absence of speciated Chromium data. Identified Remedial Action Objectives (RAOs) and calculated Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs). • Synthetic Turf Exposure, California. Performed data evaluation, and exposure assessment, a toxicity assessment, and risk characterization to evaluate potential child, adult and staff exposures to PAHs and metals detected in synthetic turf via incidental ingestion, dermal contact, and outdoor inhalation for a local municipality. Determined that the cumulative cancer risk and non-cancer hazard estimates for the most sensitive populations did not exceed Cal-EPA target health goals. • Risk Evaluations, California. Performed numerous human health screening evaluations (HHSEs) and human health risk assessments (HHRAs) consistent with Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Health and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) methodology. Prepared statistical evaluations attributing elevated levels of metals to background conditions and evaluated lead contamination using DTSC’s LeadSpread model. Familiarity with derivation of DTSC Screening Levels, and San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs). Page 1197 of 1339 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RFP 26-003 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL PAGE 1 OF 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST Kristen T. Bogue Ms. Bogue is a senior project manager and assists in the preparation of environmental and planning studies, with a focus on due diligence planning activities. Ms. Bogue has experience in the research, analysis, and writing of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)/National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation. Ms. Bogue's project management background includes a variety of projects involving mixed-use, hotel/resort, residential, commercial, redevelopment, infrastructure, and industrial uses for both public and private sector clients. In addition to being a CEQA/NEPA generalist, she specializes in the preparation of hazardous materials studies and visual analysis services. Ms. Bogue has prepared numerous hazardous materials related studies, including Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Phase I Initial Site Assessments for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Preliminary Hazardous Materials Assessments pursuant to CEQA, and Environmental Baseline Surveys for the Department of the Navy. Additionally, she is involved with Visual Impact Assessments in conformance with appropriate agency standards, including the Federal Highway Administration "Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) for Highway Projects," United States Bureau of Land Management guidelines, and California Energy Commission guidelines. Other visual services Ms. Bogue has prepared include photosimulations, shade/shadow studies, viewshed mapping, and light and glare studies. As a specialist in these specific environmental topic areas, Ms. Bogue has extensive experience with projects involving sensitive planning and environmental issues including aesthetics/light and glare, shade/shadow, and hazardous materials considerations. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Aviation Boulevard at Artesia Boulevard Southbound to Westbound Right-Turn Improvement, Manhattan Beach, California. City of Manhattan Beach. Environmental Specialist. Prepared the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Michael Baker provided design and engineering services for the city of Manhattan Beach's Aviation Boulevard at Artesia Boulevard Southbound to Westbound Right-Turn Improvement project, which included roadway widening, pedestrian improvements, and crosswalk striping. Michael Baker completed the environmental document, project report, and plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E). Full-Scale Desalination Facility - Feasibility Study, Los Angeles County, California. West Basin Municipal Water District. Environmental Specialist. Responsible for visual impact analysis. Michael Baker provided engineering, environmental, and regulatory permitting expertise related to the client's overall desalination program, including full-scale desalination plant feasibility and siting studies. Work efforts included regulatory permitting and site constraints assessments for an El Segundo site (co-located with NRG's El Segundo Generating Station), conceptual studies for additional alternative sites, and technical support on lease negotiations with potential site owners. City Wide Sewer Master Plan Project, Seal Beach, California. City of Seal Beach. Project Manager. Responsible in the preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the City of Seal Beach. The City has adopted a City-Wide Sewer Master Plan Update. The project involved the development of multiple Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs) within the City's existing sewer system. The analysis performed included a wide range of potential construction methods, including a pipe-bursting method, a cured-in-place method, and/or a trenching method for pipe rehabilitation/replacement. Specific issues included noise, growth inducing, and air quality impacts associated with project construction. Alamitos Battery Energy Storage System Environmental Services, Long Beach, California. City of Long Beach. Environmental Specialist. Provided visual analysis support services, including the selection of Key Views and assistance in the preparation of photosimulations. Michael Baker assisted the client with the preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and supporting technical analyses for the Alamitos Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) at the existing Alamitos Generating Station in Long Beach. The project included construction of a 300-megawatt battery energy storage facility consisting of three 50-foot-high buildings, similar in appearance to server farms, and constructed within the existing surface parking lot between existing Units 1 through 4 and the switchyard. Park Place Extension EIR/EA, El Segundo, California. City of El Segundo. Environmental Specialist. Prepared the Visual Impact Assessment Checklist. Michael Baker prepared the required National Environmental Policy Act/California Environmental Quality Act (NEPA/CEQA) clearance documentation for the Park Place Extension and Railroad Grade Separation Project. The project involves extending Park Place Years with Michael Baker 21 Years of Experience 21 Education B.A., 2005, Environmental Analysis and Design, University of California, Irvine Professional Affiliations Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) ASTM International (ASTM) Page 1198 of 1339 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RFP 26-003 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL PAGE 2 OF 2 between Allied Way and Nash Street and grade separating the extension from the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway tracks. The environmental analysis thoroughly discussed the existing conditions for each environmental issue area and evaluated the short- and long-term environmental impacts associated with project construction and operation (both individual and cumulative). Key issues associated with the project included hazardous materials, air quality, noise, land use/right of way impacts, and traffic and circulation. 20th Street/Walnut Avenue/Alamitos Avenue Intersection Improvements – NEPA Compliance, Long Beach, California. City of Long Beach. Environmental Specialist. Prepared the Phase I Initial Site Assessment. Michael Baker assisted with preparation of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance documentation for the 20th Street/Walnut Avenue/Alamitos Avenue Intersection Improvement Project, in the southern/central portion of the city. A small portion also extended into the southern portion of the City of Signal Hill. It involved construction of a new four-way signalized intersection, which included the realignment of Alamitos Avenue, removal of a diagonal portion of East 20th Street, and realignment of East Wesley Drive. In consultation with city staff, Michael Baker processed NEPA clearance documentation through Caltrans District 7, including the preparation of several technical studies for a categorical exclusion (CE) document. Scout House Cultural Resources Identification Study, Manhattan Beach, California. City of Manhattan Beach. Project Manager. Assisted in the preparation of the environmental documentation. Michael Baker is assisting the client with technical studies to support an appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) determination, which is anticipated to be a Class 32 categorial exemption for the proposed Scout House Project located in Manhattan Beach, California. The proposed project involves the demolition of the existing Scout House building and the construction of a new Scout House building with two floors consisting of kitchens, meeting rooms, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)- compliant restrooms, storage rooms, and an outdoor covered patio seating area. Michael Baker is also conducting reports in support of the project, including a parking study and a cultural resources identification study. Long Beach Municipal Urban Stormwater Project Environmental Services, Long Beach, California. City of Long Beach. Senior Environmental Scientist. Prepared the hazardous materials analysis to support the environmental document. Michael Baker assisted the client with preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Long Beach Municipal Urban Stormwater Treatment Project. Key issues addressed within the IS/MND include air quality impacts, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, hazards and hazardous materials, biological and cultural resources. CT Warehouse, Carson, California. City of Carson. Project Manager. Served as Project Manager and assisted in the preparation of the environmental documentation. Michael Baker prepared an initial study/mitigated negative declaration for the CT Warehouse Project. The proposed project involved the demolition of a former salvage yard and two residential dwellings, along with associated ancillary structures, to allow for the construction of a new 145,840-square-foot warehouse facility with surface parking and landscaping. The facility was designed to accommodate distribution, warehousing, and manufacturing uses, along with supporting office space. County-Wide Long-Term Routine Maintenance Permitting Program, Orange County, California. Orange County Flood Control District. Environmental Analyst. Responsible for the preparation of an IS/MND for the Orange County Flood Control District. The project would allow routine maintenance to occur within multiple existing flood control facilities, and beneath existing bridges crossing over waterways, located throughout the County of Orange. Flood control maintenance activities would include channel maintenance (i.e., cleaning, silt removal, slope maintenance/repair), landscape maintenance and vegetation control/removal, insect/rodent control, rip-rap installation and repair, structural inspection/cleaning, installation of storm drain pipes and underdrains, fabrication and installation of headwalls, removal/replacement of concrete lining, and the repair and backfill of washouts. River Avenue Storm Drain Improvements IS/MND/EA, Long Beach, California. City of Long Beach. Project Coordinator. Prepared the Mitigated Negative Declaration for proposed storm drain improvements along River Avenue. Michael Baker prepared the CEQA documentation for the River Avenue Storm Drain Improvements project for the City of Long Beach. The project proposed approximately 1,800 linear feet of improvements along the River Avenue storm drain system, located from the intersection of Wardlow Road and River Avenue to the Southern California Edison (SCE) easement, south of Arlington Street. The inadequate River Avenue drainage system has resulted in flooding to adjacent residents. The project proposes to bring the flood protection in this area to a full 10-year protection level. The project would construct a parallel storm drain system along River Avenue. A detention basin (proposed at the SCE easement) would temporarily hold two acre-feet of stormwater during heavy flows and then release the flows as the storm abates. Star Express Car Wash Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Long Beach, California. City of Long Beach. Environmental Specialist. Conducted quality control review of the environmental documentation. Michael Baker assisted the city of Long Beach with the preparation of an initial study/mitigated negative declaration for the Star Express Car Wash Project located at 1911 Pacific Coast Highway. The project demolished an on-site restaurant and associated surface parking lot to construct a staffed, automated express car wash facility. Michael Baker prepared technical studies and analyses pertaining to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, energy, noise, and cultural and paleontological resources. The team also conducted a peer review of an applicant-provided traffic memo. Page 1199 of 1339 37 Robert Menald, CAC, CMI, CLIA, CLPM, CIEC Page 2 Mold Investigation and Remediation Management and Oversight. Performed mold investigations and remediation management and oversight at numerous buildings. Investigations included visual inspections, moisture mapping, bulk sample collection, interpretation of analytical results, and report preparation. Remediation management and oversight included work plan preparation, contractor oversight, collection of post-remediation bulk and/or air samples, interpretation of analytical results, and report preparation. Indoor Air Quality Services. Performed indoor air quality investigations at numerous sites throughout California. Investigations included visual inspections, collection of indoor air quality measurements, bulk and/or air samples collection, interpretation of findings and analytical results, and report preparation. Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) Sampling. LAUSD, On-Call Environmental Assessment Contract, Various Sites, Los Angeles, California As a subcontractor to Terraphase, TES provides CIH consultation during health and safety plan development. Terraphase/TES field teams sample various building materials with Los Angeles to assess PCB content of materials in support of planning for appropriate waste management and disposal during future demolition activities. As project team leader, performed visual inspections, collection of PCBs bulk samples, reviewed and interpreted laboratory data at various LAUSD schools including, but not limited to, Calabash Charter Academy and Yorkdale Elementary School. BPAS for Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Pre-Alteration Assessment, IH Surveillance and Air Monitoring Services” Federal Building Throughout the Counties of Los Angeles and Orange, CA. BPA No. 47PK1721A0006 Mr. Menald provides project management for various asbestos and lead projects performed at the Chet Holifield Federal Building, Wilshire Federal Building, 300 North Los Angeles Federal Building, Richard H. Chambers, U.S. Court of Appeals, Roybal Federal Building, Spring Street Courthouse, Glenn M. Anderson Federal Building, Ronald Reagan Federal Building, Santa Ana Federal Building, James C. Corman Federal Building and Huntington Park SSA Federal Building from 2016 to present. Asbestos and lead surveys included collection of asbestos bulk PLM samples, onsite XRF readings, and collection of bulk lead paint chip samples, followed by bulk sample submittal to an accredited laboratory for analysis, review of laboratory analytical reports, and preparation of survey reports. Asbestos abatement monitoring included on-site observation monitoring of asbestos abatement activities and clearance inspection of the asbestos work areas after abatement activities were complete to evaluate presence of visible asbestos dust/ debris. Clearance of PCM air sampling of the asbestos work areas was performed, and analysis on-site and/or submittal of PCM samples were sent to an accredited laboratory for analysis, followed by preparation of monitoring reports. TES also kept and prepared daily observation logs of all asbestos abatement activities, alongside daily PCM air monitoring throughout the project’s entirety. Additionally, TEM air, microvac/wipe sampling with visual inspection of the project area, TEM ambient air, and surface dust microvac/wipe sampling was completed. All samples were submitted to an accredited laboratory for analysis, and review/preparation of the assessment reports. Industrial Hygiene Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. 888-948-4826 714-871-87121521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831 Page 1200 of 1339 Appendix C Required Forms •Certification of Proposal •Non-Collusion Affidavit •Compliance with Insurance Requirements •Acknowledgment of Professional Services Agreement •Acknowledgment of Addendum No. 1 Page 1201 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 52 of 56 7.2 Required Forms 7.2.1 Certification of Proposal RFP #: _________ The undersigned hereby submits its proposal and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal (RFP). 1. Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Proposal, Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. 2. By submitting the response to this request, Proposer agrees, if selected to furnish services to the City in accordance with this RFP. 3. Proposer has carefully reviewed its proposal and understands and agrees that the City is not responsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the Proposer and that the Proposer is responsible for them. 4. It is understood and agreed that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals and to waive any informality or irregularity in any proposal received by the City. 5. The proposal response includes all of the commentary, figures and data required by the Request for Proposal 6. The proposal shall be valid for 90 days from the date of submittal. 7. Proposer acknowledges that the City may issue addendums related to this RFP and that the proposer has reviewed the following addendums which have been issued: Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ 8. Proposer further acknowledges the provisions of any addendums issued have been incorporated into their proposal. 26-003 No. 1 Page 1202 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 53 of 56 Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Nancy Anglin, PE, Principal Engineer/Operations Manager Page 1203 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 54 of 56 7.2.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit RFP #: _________ The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1.This proposal is not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation. 2.This proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham. 3. I have not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Proposer to put in a false or sham proposal and I have not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any other Proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal or to refrain from submitting to this RFP. 4. I have not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price or to fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the proposal price or to secure any advantage against the City of Hermosa Beach or of anyone interested in the proposed contract. 5.All statements contained in the Proposal and related documents are true. 6. I have not directly or indirectly submitted the proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any person, corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, RFP depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. 7. I have not entered into any arrangement or agreement with any City of Hermosa Beach public officer in connection with this proposal. 8. I understand collusive bidding is a violation of State and Federal law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ 26-003 Nancy Anglin, PE, Principal Engineer/Operations Manager Page 1204 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 55 of 56 7.2.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements RFP #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with the City s insurance requirements contained within this RFP. The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1.Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the insurance requirements as specified in the Request for Proposal. 2.If selected, proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ 26-003 Nancy Anglin, PE, Principal Engineer/Operations Manager Page 1205 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 56 of 56 7.2.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement RFP #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City s Professional Services Agreement. Proposers should identify and/or indicate any exceptions to the Sample Professional Services Agreement included in Section 6.2. The City Attorney or their designee retains the discretion to accept or reject proposed exceptions or modifications to the City s Professional Services Agreement. 1.Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the conditions specified in the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement. 2.Proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein with exceptions noted as follows: ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ 26-003 Nancy Anglin, PE, Principal Engineer/Operations Manager Page 1206 of 1339 Page 4 of 4 City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 RFQ 26-003 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL ACT (CEQA) PROJECT ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY YARD REPLACEMENT PROJECT Complete and sign this acknowledgement form. Submit and enclose the acknowledgement in your proposal. Failure to do so may result in disqualification of your firm’s proposal. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of Addendum No. 1 dated March 5, 2025. ATTEST: _____________________________________ Principal: _____________________________________ Address: _____________________________________ By: _____________________________________ Title: _____________________________________ Nancy Anglin, PE Principal Engineer | Operations Manager 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 450, Long Beach, CA 90804 Nancy Anglin, PE Page 1207 of 1339 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. This professional services agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of [________] (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Hermosa Beach (a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (“City”) and Roux Associates, Inc. (a C corporation with its principal place of business at 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 450, Long Beach, California 90804 (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are hereinafter sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. RECITALS A. City is a public agency of the State of California and is in need of Consultant’s environmental assessment services (“Services”); and B. Consultant is duly licensed and has the necessary qualifications to provide such Services; and C. The Parties desire by this Agreement to establish the terms for City to retain Consultant to provide the Services described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: AGREEMENT 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Services. Consultant shall provide the City with the Services as set forth in in Exhibit A, Services, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of Exhibit A and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. Page 1208 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 19 3. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel identified in their proposal. Consultant warrants that Consultant is familiar with all laws that may affect its performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect Consultant’s performance of this Agreement. Consultant further represents that no City employee will provide any services under this Agreement. 4. Compensation a. Subject to paragraph 4b below, the City shall pay for the services listed in Exhibit A. b. In no event shall the total amount paid for services rendered by Consultant under this Agreement exceed the sum of FOUR HUNDRED NINETY EIGHT THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS ($498,800). This amount is to cover all related costs for the duration of the term, and the City will not pay any additional fees for printing expenses. Consultant shall submit invoices to City no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the performance of work for which Consultant is billing, invoices shall detail the work performed on each milestone and each project as applicable. All invoices for City’s approved task(s) and or deliverable(s) shall include the following in order for payments to be processed: (1) Consultant’s name, (2) Contract number, (3) Task number, (4) Purchase order number, (5) Project name, (6) Invoice number, (7) Invoice date, (8) Billing period, (9) For work performed on a lump sum basis, the deliverables provided during the billing period or the percentage of each task completed during the billing period, (10) For work performed on a time and materials basis, the name of the staff member working on the task and/or deliverable, the specific task or sub- task performed, the date of performance, the number of hours performed on that date, the staff member’s billing rate per Exhibit B, Cost Proposal, and the description of work performed for that time entry. Any charges for Page 1209 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 19 approved direct expenditures (e.g., mileage, parking, etc.) shall be accompanied by receipts or other documentation. (11) Total budgeted task amount, (12) Percentage of total task amount billed to date, and (13) Other information as required by a specific task. c. Said invoice shall be based on the total of all Consultant’s services which have been completed to City’s sole satisfaction. City shall pay Consultant’s invoice within forty-five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. The invoice shall describe in detail the services performed, the method of compensation subject to paragraph 4d below, and the associated time for completion. Any additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as “Additional Services” and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where applicable, on all invoices. d. Compensation for services under this Agreement shall be based on one of the following methods of compensation: (1) Lump Sum Method: whereby the Consultant is compensated for meeting designed project milestones for a specific Task. All of the Consultant’s costs, including employee salaries, overhead, other direct costs, subcontract expenses, and profit are included in the Lump Sum amount; (2) Time and Materials Method: whereby the Consultant is compensated based upon the agreed upon rates as stated in Exhibit B, Cost Proposal, and other approved direct costs, subject to Engineer’s approval, with a total not to exceed amount as stated in Exhibit B. Exhibit B shall be in effect for the duration of the Agreement; (3) Combination of Method 1 or 2 above: whereby the Consultant is compensated for some line items in their proposal based upon the Lump Sum Method and other line items in their proposal based on Time and Materials Method. 5. Additional or Removed Work. If changes in the work seem merited by the Parties and informal consultations with the other Party indicate that a change is warranted, it shall be processed by the Consultant forwarding a letter to the City outlining the changes with a statement of estimated changes in fee and/or time schedule. An amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared by the City and executed by both Parties before performance of such services, or the City will not be required to pay for the changes in the scope of work. Such amendment shall not render ineffective or invalidate Page 1210 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 19 unaffected portions of this Agreement. In the absence of an amendment, the City may order such changes and equitably adjust compensation as necessary. 6. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue until May 31, 2030, unless the Agreement is previously terminated as provided for herein (“Term”). 7. Maintenance of Records; Audits a. Records of Consultant’s services relating to this Agreement shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be made available to City for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient times for a period of four (4) years from the Effective Date. b. Books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred shall be maintained by Consultant and made available at all reasonable times during the contract period and for four (4) years from the date of final payment under the contract for inspection by City. 8. Time of Performance. Consultant shall perform its services in a prompt and timely manner and shall commence performance upon receipt of written notice from the City to proceed. Consultant shall complete the services required hereunder within Term. 9. Delays in Performance a. Neither Party shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non-performing Party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include a Force Majeure Event. A Force Majeure Event shall mean an event that materially affects the Consultant’s performance and is one or more of the following: (1) Acts of God or other natural disasters occurring at the project site; (2) terrorism or other acts of a public enemy; (3) orders of governmental authorities (including, without limitation, unreasonable and unforeseeable delay in the issuance of permits or approvals by governmental authorities that are required for the services); and (4) pandemics, epidemics, or quarantine restrictions. “Orders of governmental authorities” includes ordinances; emergency proclamations and orders; and rules to protect the public health, welfare, and safety. b. Should a Force Majeure Event occur, the non-performing Party shall (within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing) give written notice to the other Party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance. Delays shall not entitle Consultant to any additional compensation regardless of the Party responsible for the delay. 10. Compliance with Law Page 1211 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 19 a. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations of the Federal, state, and local government (including California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements). b. Consultant shall assist the City as requested in obtaining and maintaining all permits required of Consultant by Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies. c. If applicable, Consultant is responsible for all costs of clean up and / or removal of hazardous and toxic substances spilled as a result of his or her services or operations performed under this Agreement. 11. Standard of Care. Consultant’s services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles; and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. Consultant’s performance shall conform in all material respects to the requirements of the scope of Services as described in Exhibit A. 12. Conflicts of Interest. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall at all times maintain a duty of loyalty and a fiduciary duty to the City; and shall not accept payment from or employment with any person or entity which will constitute a conflict of interest with the City. 13. Assignment and Subconsultant. Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the City (which may be withheld for any reason). Any attempt to so assign or so transfer without such consent shall be void and without legal effect and shall constitute grounds for termination. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall prevent Consultant from employing independent associates and subconsultants as Consultant may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder. 14. Independent Consultant. Consultant is retained as an independent contractor and is not an employee of City. No employee or agent of Consultant shall become an employee of City. The work to be performed shall be in accordance with the work described in this Agreement, subject to such directions and amendments from City as herein provided. Any personnel performing the work governed by this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such personnel (including but not limited to social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance). Page 1212 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 of 19 15. Insurance. Consultant shall not commence work for the City until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. a. Additional Insured. The City (its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers) shall be named as additional insureds on Consultant’s and its subconsultants’ policies of commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance using the endorsements and forms specified herein or exact equivalents. b. Commercial General Liability (i) The Consultant shall take out and maintain (during the performance of all work under this Agreement, in amounts not less than specified herein) Commercial General (“CG”) Liability Insurance in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. (ii) Coverage for CG Liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) CG Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 00 01) or exact equivalent. (iii) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for the following: (1) Bodily Injury and Property Damage (2) Personal Injury/Advertising Injury (3) Premises/Operations Liability (4) Products/Completed Operations Liability (5) Aggregate Limits that Apply per Project (6) Explosion, Collapse, and Underground (UCX) exclusion deleted (7) Contractual Liability with respect to this Agreement (8) Property Damage (9) Independent Consultants Coverage (iv) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; (3) products/completed operations liability; or (4) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement. (v) The policy shall give City (its elected and appointed Page 1213 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 7 of 19 officials, officers, employees, agents, and City-designated volunteers) additional insured status using ISO endorsement forms CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (vi) The general liability program may utilize either deductibles or provide coverage excess of a self-insured retention, subject to written approval by the City; and provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured. c. Automobile Liability (i) At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain Automobile Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage (including coverage for owned, non-owned, and hired vehicles in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City). (ii) Coverage for automobile liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 00 01 covering automobile liability (Coverage Symbol 1, any auto). (iii) The policy shall give City (its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and City-designated volunteers) additional insured status. (iv) Subject to written approval by the City, the automobile liability program may utilize deductibles; provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured, but not a self-insured retention. d. Workers’ Compensation/Employer’s Liability (i) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code; and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. (ii) To the extent Consultant has employees at any time during the term of this Agreement (at all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement), the Consultant shall maintain full compensation insurance for all persons employed directly by him/her to carry out the work contemplated under this Agreement (all in accordance with the “Workers’ Compensation and Insurance Act”, Division IV of the Labor Code of the State of California and any acts amendatory thereof, and Employer’s Liability Coverage in amounts indicated herein). Consultant shall require all subconsultants to obtain and maintain (for the period required by this Agreement) workers’ compensation coverage of the same type and limits as specified in this section. e. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions). At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain Page 1214 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 8 of 19 professional liability or Errors and Omissions insurance appropriate to its profession in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City and in an amount indicated herein. This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors, or omissions of the Consultant. “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. f. Privacy/Network Security (Cyber). At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain privacy/network security insurance for: (1) privacy breaches; (2) system breaches; (3) denial or loss of service; and (4) the introduction, implantation, or spread of malicious software code in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. g. Minimum Policy Limits Required (i) The following insurance limits are required: Combined Single Limit Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 per occurrence/$4,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence Professional Liability $1,000,000 per claim and aggregate (errors and omissions) Cyber Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence and aggregate (ii) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits. (iii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement; or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Any available coverage shall be provided to the Parties required to be named as Additional Insured pursuant to this Agreement. Page 1215 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 9 of 19 h. Evidence Required. Prior to execution of the Agreement, the Consultant shall file with the City evidence of insurance from an insurer or insurers certifying to the coverage of all insurance required herein. Such evidence shall include original copies of the ISO CG 00 01 (or insurer’s equivalent) signed by the insurer’s representative and Certificate of Insurance (Acord Form 25-S or equivalent), together with required endorsements. All evidence of insurance shall be signed by a properly authorized officer, agent, or qualified representative of the insurer and shall certify the names of the insured, any additional insureds (where appropriate) the type and amount of the insurance, the location and operations to which the insurance applies, and the expiration date of such insurance. i. Policy Provisions Required (i) Consultant shall provide the City at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement; except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of the premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the City at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (ii) The Commercial General Liability Policy and Automobile Policy shall each contain a provision stating that Consultant’s policy is primary insurance and that any insurance, self-insurance, or other coverage maintained by the City or any named insureds shall not be called upon to contribute to any loss. (iii) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three (3) years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period (a) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; (b) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or (c) if the policy is replaced by another claims-made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. (iv) All required insurance coverages (except for the professional liability coverage) shall contain or be endorsed to provide waiver of subrogation in favor of the City (its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers) or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City; and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants. (v) The limits set forth herein shall apply separately to each insured against whom claims are made or suits are brought, except with respect to the limits of liability. Further the limits set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it limit the Page 1216 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 10 of 19 Consultant’s indemnification obligations to the City and shall not preclude the City from taking such other actions available to the City under other provisions of the Agreement or law. j. Qualifying Insurers. All policies required shall be issued by acceptable insurance companies (as determined by the City) which satisfy the following minimum requirements: Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and admitted to transact in the business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any Federal law. k. Additional Insurance Provisions (i) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant; and any approval of said insurance by the City is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement (including but not limited to the provisions concerning indemnification). (ii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, the City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement. (iii) The City may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (iv) The City (City Council, any member of the City Council, officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers) shall not be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. l. Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the City that they have secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the City as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, the City may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 16. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel reasonably approved by the City), indemnify, and hold the City (its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and authorized volunteers) free and harmless from any and all claims (demands, causes of action, suits, actions, proceedings, costs, expenses, liability, judgments, awards, decrees, settlements, loss, Page 1217 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 11 of 19 damage or injury of any kind in law or equity to property or persons including wrongful death (“Claims”)) in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts (errors, omissions, or willful misconduct) of Consultant (its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents) in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s services, the Project, or this Agreement (including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees, attorneys’ fees, and other related costs and expenses). This indemnification clause excludes Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City (the City Council, members of the City Council, its employees, or authorized volunteers). Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. 17. California Labor Code Requirements a. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq. (as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq.) ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws if applicable. Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City (its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents) free and harmless from any claims (liabilities, costs, penalties, or interest) arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and all subcontractors to comply with all California Labor Code provisions which include but are not limited to prevailing wages (Labor Code Sections 1771, 1774 and 1775), employment of apprentices (Labor Code Section 1777.5), certified payroll records (Labor Code Sections 1771.4 and 1776), hours of labor (Labor Code Sections 1813 and 1815), and debarment of contractors and subcontractors (Labor Code Section 1777.1). The requirement to submit certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Section 1771.4. b. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants performing such Services must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants, as applicable. This Project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements Page 1218 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 12 of 19 mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1. 18. Verification of Employment Eligibility. By executing this Agreement, Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and Federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens (including but not limited to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as may be amended from time to time), and shall require all subconsultants and sub-subconsultants to comply with the same. 19. Laws and Venue. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or Federal court situated in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. 20. Termination or Abandonment a. The City has the right to terminate or abandon any portion or all of the work under this Agreement by giving ten (10) calendar days’ written notice to Consultant. In such event, City shall be immediately given title and possession to all original field notes, drawings and specifications, written reports, and other documents produced or developed for that portion of the work completed and/or being abandoned. The City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered for any portion of the work completed prior to termination. If said termination occurs prior to completion of any task for the Project for which a payment request has not been received, the charge for services performed during such task shall be the reasonable value of such services (based on an amount mutually agreed to by the Parties of the portion of such task completed but not paid prior to said termination). The City shall not be liable for any costs other than the charges or portions thereof which are specified herein. Consultant shall not be entitled to payment for unperformed services, and shall not be entitled to damages or compensation for termination of work. b. Consultant may terminate its obligation to provide further services under this Agreement upon thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice to City only in the event of substantial failure by City to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of Consultant. c. If the Agreement is terminated prior to its completion for any reason, Consultant shall refund the monthly prorated cost of the incomplete term. 21. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Consultant (when requested) shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City’s representative, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that Page 1219 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 13 of 19 an error or omission attributable to Consultant’s professional services occurs, Consultant shall (at no cost to City) provide all other services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of the City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. 22. Prohibited Employment. Consultant shall not employ any current employee of City to perform the work under this Agreement while this Agreement is in effect. 23. Costs. Each Party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement; and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as expressly provided herein. 24. Ownership of Documents and Confidential Information a. All deliverables and other documents generated by Consultant in the performance of the Services (including all work papers, work-in-progress, designs, drawings, documents, data, computations, specifications, studies and reports prepared by Consultant as a part of the Services or authorized Additional Services (“Consultant Work Product”)) shall belong to and be subject to the sole ownership and use of City. b. Consultant may receive written or verbal information from City (its representatives or agents) not in the public domain during the course of the performance of this Agreement. Such information may include City’s know how, trade secrets, and other proprietary and confidential information; and Consultant agrees to treat such information as confidential information belonging to City. Consultant agrees that neither it (nor its officers, employees, representatives, agents, successors, or assigns) will disclo se such information to any third party or use the same in any manner without the prior written consent of City. Consultant further agrees to safeguard such proprietary and confidential information from unauthorized disclosure and/or use using the same degree of care it uses to protect its own proprietary and confidential information, but not less than a reasonable standard of care. In the event that disclosure of such information is sought pursuant to any law or regulation, Consultant shall promptly notify City of such fact to allow City to assert whatever exclusions or exemptions may be available to it under applicable law or regulation. 25. Organization. Consultant shall assign Nancy Anglin as Project Manager. Consultant shall provide City fifteen (15) days written notice before removing or reassigning the Project Manager from the performance of the Services. 26. Limitation of Agreement. This Agreement is limited to and includes only the work included in the scope of Services described in Exhibit A. 27. Notice. Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered by this Agreement may be given or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Page 1220 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 14 of 19 Office (certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and addressed to the following addresses) and shall be effective upon receipt thereof: CITY: City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Attn: Joseph SanClemente CONSULTANT: Roux Associates, Inc. 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 200 Long Beach, CA 90804 Attn: Jay M. Shipley 28. Third Party Rights. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the City and the Consultant. 29. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non- discrimination shall include but not be limited to all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination. 30. City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves its right to employ other consultants, including engineers, in connection with the scope of Services as listed in Exhibit A or other scopes of Services. 31. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors in interest, executors, administrators, and assigns of each Party to this Agreement. However, Consultant shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties, or obligations without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment without such consent shall be invalid and void. 32. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has neither employed nor retained any company or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant) to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person (other than Page 1221 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 15 of 19 a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant) any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall h ave the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. No official, officer, or employee of City (during the term of his or her service with City) shall have any direct interest in this Agreement; or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom for the term of this Agreement. 33. Non-Waiver. The delay or failure of either Party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other Party of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the Party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy with respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy with respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. 34. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable for any reason, such determination shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the offending provision in any other circumstance; and the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 35. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 36. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain, or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof; and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 37. Amendments. Only a writing executed by all of the Parties hereto or their respective successors and assigns may amend this Agreement. 38. Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said Parties; and that by doing so, the Parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. 39. Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including the Exhibits) represents the entire understanding of the Parties as to those matters contained herein; and supersedes and cancels any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understanding, promises, or representations with respect to those matters covered hereunder. Each Party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have Page 1222 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 16 of 19 been made by any person which are not incorporated herein, and that any other agreements shall be void. This is an integrated Agreement. 40. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one single Agreement. 41. Electronic Signature. Each Party acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement may be executed by electronic or digital signature, which shall be considered as an original signature for all purposes and shall have the same force and effect as an original signature. 42. Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to the City that certain additional key personnel and consultants will perform the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel or consultants become unavailable, Consultant may substitute others of at least equal competence upon written approval of the City. In the event the Parties cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, engineers, or consultants, the City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. Any personnel, engineers, or consultants who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City (or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Services, or a threat to the safety of persons or property) shall be promptly removed from the Services by the Consultant at the request of the City. The key additional personnel, engineers, and consultants for performance of this Agreement are as follows: [INSERT NAMES, AND TITLES OF KEY PERSONNEL, AND LICENSE NUMBERS, IF APPLICABLE]. 43. Licenses and Permits. Consultant shall obtain all licenses and permits necessary for the performance of the Services at no cost to the City, except with respect to the following licenses and permits if so identified which the City shall obtain at its own cost: None. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] Page 1223 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 17 of 19 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVED BY: Steve Napolitano City Manager ATTESTED BY: Martha Alvarez City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jason Baltimore Interim City Attorney ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Jay M. Shipley National Director of Public Sector Services Taxpayer Identified Number: 11-2479482 Page 1224 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 18 of 19 EXHIBIT A SERVICES (PROPOSAL) Page 1225 of 1339 PROPOSALCITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Department of Public Works 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL ACT PROJECT ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY YARD REPLACEMENT PROJECT Revised May 13, 2026Page 1226 of 1339 Page 1227 of 1339 Page 1228 of 1339 Page 1229 of 1339 Page 1230 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 5 3 Project Understanding and Approach to Scope of Work Statement of Project Understanding The City of Hermosa Beach City Yard Replacement Project is a technically complex, highly scrutinized public project that requires the seamless integration of CEQA compliance, legacy site remediation, regulatory coordination, and public transparency. The City is not simply seeking preparation of an environmental document; it is seeking a trusted technical partner capable of delivering a legally defensible CEQA (and potential CEQA/NEPA) analysis while advancing the project efficiently toward remediation, construction, and regulatory closure. The Project site at 555 6th Street has a long operational history as a municipal maintenance yard, including former landfill use, underground storage tanks, petroleum-impacted soils, metals, soil vapor concerns, and groundwater impacts. The City has prudently invested in extensive environmental investigations, risk assessments, and corrective action planning over several decades. These studies provide a robust technical foundation, but also identify specific data gaps, regulatory updates, and implementation needs that must now be addressed to support redevelopment. In addition, the City is evaluating the demolition of the Hermosa Beach Self Storage facility at 552 11th Place (for temporary relocation of the City’s maintenance yard) as well as potential consolidation of additional municipal functions (including engineering offices), which introduces flexibility, but also uncertainty, into project definition. Funding considerations may further require compliance with both CEQA and NEPA, increasing the importance of a scalable and coordinated environmental documentation strategy. Our team understands that the City’s primary objectives are to:  Achieve defensible CEQA compliance that withstands public and legal scrutiny  Avoid unnecessary duplication of prior environmental work  Update hazardous materials and remediation documentation to meet current regulatory standards  Maintain schedule and cost control while reducing regulatory risk  Communicate clearly and transparently with the public and decision-makers  Advance the site toward No Further Action (NFA) or equivalent regulatory closure In summary, Roux understands the City’s objectives to complete a legally defensible, efficient CEQA process that supports implementation of the City Yard Replacement Project while appropriately addressing the site’s environmental history. Roux is prepared to apply its CEQA, regulatory, and technical expertise to deliver high-quality environmental documentation that meets the City’s objectives. Approach to Work Program A. Technical Studies Our trusted team member, Michael Baker, will coordinate with City staff to initiate CEQA, confirm the project description/analysis parameters, and complete the technical studies needed to support CEQA documentation. This includes an in-person kickoff meeting and a brief meeting summary (agenda, minutes, and action items). A detailed description of each task is presented in Michael Baker’s cost proposal included in the separately attached cost proposal. Michael Baker will compile and review available planning/policy and environmental information and complete one site visit with photo documentation. Michael Baker will prepare a draft project description for City review, including key exhibits (regional map, vicinity map, and conceptual site plan). The following Technical Studies will be prepared:  Transportation (VMT Screening Memo): Prepare a VMT screening memo with project-specific trip generation (daily and AM/PM peak hour), including credit for existing on-site uses as appropriate; full VMT analysis is not included. Two submittals (draft and final) are included.  Air Quality: Prepare CEQA air quality analysis/modeling consistent with SCAQMD guidance using CalEEMod (v2022.1), including localized impacts (LST methodology) and health risk analysis; address AQMP consistency and naturally occurring asbestos qualitatively.  Greenhouse Gas (GHG): Prepare construction and operational GHG emissions inventory (CalEEMod), incorporate applicable program reductions, and evaluate consistency with SCAG 2024–2050 RTP/SCS, CARB 2022 Scoping Plan, and PLAN Hermosa climate policies.  Energy: Prepare CEQA energy analysis (PRC 21100(b)(3); CEQA Guidelines Appendix G/F), including Page 1231 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 6 construction/operational energy estimates (CalEEMod) and consistency with applicable energy plans.  Noise and Vibration: Conduct baseline noise monitoring (up to four locations; ~10 minutes each) and model construction noise/vibration (FTA guidance) and operational noise at sensitive receptors.  Cultural and Paleontological Resources: Prepare a Cultural and Paleontological Resources Memo (records/locality searches, literature review, sensitivity assessment, built-environment survey, and DPR 523 forms, as applicable).  AB 52 Tribal Consultation Assistance: Prepare and send AB 52 consultation invitation letters (on behalf of the City) and maintain a mailing log. B. Draft & Final CEQA Documents Based on the technical analyses (Item A) and in coordination with City staff, Michael Baker will prepare a project-specific IS/MND. An EIR is not anticipated and is excluded from this scope; if an EIR is later determined necessary, it will be provided under a separate scope and fee. The IS/MND will be prepared in a City-ready format and will include, as applicable:  Introduction, project description, and Initial Study checklist/impact determinations  Environmental analysis and mitigation measures (as needed), supported by Task 2 technical studies  Mandatory findings of significance and determination page  Up to six graphic exhibits Drafting and submittals. Michael Baker will prepare the IS/MND through the following stages: (1) Administrative Draft; (2) Screencheck Draft (incorporating one consolidated set of City comments); (3) Public Review Draft (final City edits incorporated); and (4) Final IS/MND (Public Review Draft plus responses to comments/errata and the MMRP). Responses to comments and errata. Michael Baker will prepare draft and final responses to comments received during the 30-day public review period, incorporating one consolidated set of City comments per draft. The level of public/agency comment is unknown; this scope includes up to 40 hours to respond to comments. If additional technical analysis or expanded response effort is needed, Michael Baker will advise the City and request additional funding. If necessary, an errata will be prepared with revisions shown in strikethrough and double underline. CEQA notices and filings. Michael Baker will prepare required notices for City review and distribute via certified mail to a City-approved distribution list, and will complete the following filings/submittals:  Prepare and file the Notice of Availability/Notice of Intent (NOA/NOI) to initiate the 30-day public review period.  Prepare the Notice of Completion (NOC) and State Clearinghouse Summary Form and submit required materials to the State Clearinghouse via CEQASubmit (including ADA-compliant uploads).  Post the NOA/NOI at the County Clerk-Recorder Office.  Prepare and file the Notice of Determination (NOD) within five days of Final IS/MND adoption (includes payment of CDFW filing fees; assumes 2026 fee schedule applies).  City responsibility: any radius mailing and/or newspaper notices required for the project. C. Optional – Combined CEQA/NEPA Upon notification of federal funding, Michael Baker will meet virtually with City staff to confirm the appropriate level of NEPA documentation/clearance. The Initial Study prepared under Item B will be used to support NEPA clearance. This task assumes the project will qualify for a Categorical Exclusion (CE); additional NEPA-level analysis beyond the Item A technical studies, if required by the Federal lead agency, would be provided under a separate scope and fee. D. Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program (MMRP) Michael Baker will prepare an MMRP to track implementation of mitigation measures and conditions of approval identified in the Initial Study during project implementation. The MMRP checklist will summarize, as applicable:  Mitigation measure number and topic area  Mitigation/condition language (chronological order)  Monitoring milestone and responsible party  Verification method and sign-off (initials/date) with remarks E. Public Outreach Ms. Bogue of Michael Baker will represent the Project Team at up to three in-person public hearings (e.g., Planning Commission and City Council). Attendance at a public scoping meeting is excluded because preparation of an EIR is not included in this scope. Any additional public outreach meetings or hearings would be provided under a separate scope on a time-and-materials basis. Page 1232 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 7 F. Project Management Roux and Michael Baker will provide proactive project management throughout the duration of the City Yard Replacement Project. Roux will attend meetings with City staff, the applicant team, regulatory agencies, stakeholders, and members of the public, as requested by the City. Project management will focus on maintaining clear communication, aligning technical work with City goals and CEQA milestones, and identifying potential issues early to avoid delays. Roux will designate a single point of contact responsible for coordination, scheduling, and responsiveness to City direction. G. Hazardous Materials Studies Roux understands that the site has been subject to extensive prior environmental investigation and remediation, and that the City requires targeted updates to reflect current regulatory standards and screening criteria. i. Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) and Supplementary Site Investigations (SSIs): Roux will review existing Phase II ESAs and SSI data completed in 2012 (Brycon) and 2018 (Dudek) and will prepare an updated Phase II ESA and/or SSI as needed to address changes in regulations, guidance, or screening levels. We understand from the documents reviewed that two USTs were abandoned in place, and are in the western portion of the site, beneath the older site building. The evaluation will focus on data gaps relevant to the proposed grading and redevelopment footprint and will be scaled appropriately to CEQA and remedial decision-making needs. ii. Hazardous Materials Surveys: Roux’s trusted team member Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (TES) will perform updated hazardous building materials surveys to support demolition and redevelopment activities under Roux’s overall project management and coordination. The scope includes a supplemental asbestos and lead-containing materials survey at the City Yard facility at 555 6th Street to address data gaps in prior hazardous building materials surveys, and a full asbestos and lead-containing materials demolition survey for the structures located at 552 11th Place (Hermosa Beach Self Storage). Surveys will be limited to accessible and observable building materials anticipated to be impacted by demolition or renovation and will consist of visual inspection and representative sampling of suspect asbestos‑containing materials (ACM/ACCM) and lead‑containing materials (LBP/LCM). The Titan team will collect up to 265 bulk asbestos samples for analysis by polarized light microscopy (PLM) and up to four lead bulk samples for waste profiling analyses, including Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC), Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration using the Waste Extraction Test (STLC/WET), and Total Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP), as applicable. Representative paint chip sampling and field screening will be performed where appropriate to support regulatory compliance and demolition planning. Sampling, analytical testing, and documentation will be completed in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local requirements. The results of the surveys will be summarized in updated asbestos and lead survey reports suitable to support regulatory compliance, abatement planning, waste characterization, and demolition sequencing. Activities beyond the defined scope or sample counts will be performed only upon additional authorization. iii. Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA): Roux will perform an HHRA to estimate baseline risk to current and future receptors at the City Maintenance Yard in the absence of future remedial actions (e.g., excavation, capping, etc.). The HHRA will follow DTSC and United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) protocols and will achieve quality appropriate for California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) review. The HHRA will evaluate exposure to indoor air (via modeling other media to estimate potential vapor intrusion to indoor air), and exposure to soil. Key elements of the HHRA approach include: using default attenuation factors to model indoor-air exposure point concentrations from soil vapor and/or groundwater, incorporating site-specific lines of evidence as available; and using existing investigation data and Roux data to develop exposure point concentrations for media of concern. 1. Evaluate arsenic relative to Southern California ambient concentrations, consistent with DTSC/Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) HHRA Note Number 11. 2. Consistent with planning institutional controls (e.g., capping), evaluating commercial/industrial and construction worker receptors; residential use will not be evaluated. 3. Estimate cumulative risk across applicable media for each receptor. Report cancer risk as excess incremental lifetime cancer risk, and non-cancer risk as hazards index. Compare results to applicable target risk and hazard thresholds. Page 1233 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 8 For lead, apply DTSC’s LeadSpread model. HHRA results will be provided in a standalone report. iv. Corrective Action Plan (CAP): Roux will prepare an updated CAP, as needed, to reflect updated regulatory requirements or screening levels since the 2019 Dudek CAP. The updated CAP will also incorporate the comments presented in the SMU approval letter dated January 3, 2020 including an evaluation of SCAQMD Rules 1166 and 1466, which were not addressed in prior reports, and will assess their applicability to the site and proposed remedial approach. The updated CAP may also address the need for vapor intrusion mitigation design for the proposed structures, vent cone design for the oil well, post-construction indoor air sampling, etc. This analysis will be coordinated with the City and relevant regulatory agencies to ensure that the CAP is technically accurate, implementable, and aligned with both CEQA documentation and air quality regulatory expectations. H. Health and Safety Plan (HASP) Roux will prepare a site-specific HASP in compliance with California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 5192 (HAZWOPER). The HASP will address work procedures and personal protective equipment necessary to protect future construction workers during CAP field activities, as well as measures to protect offsite sensitive receptors. The HASP will be tailored to anticipated site conditions and remedial activities. I. Workplan Addendum to the CAP Roux will prepare a Workplan Addendum to the CAP per the SMU request proposing additional surficial soil sampling in future grading areas where soils have not been previously assessed, including beneath existing structures to be demolished. Sampling locations will be distributed to achieve adequate coverage consistent with an approximate 50-foot by 50-foot grid as shown on the Site Plan in Appendix A. Samples will be analyzed for metals, pH, and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), with additional analyses for semi-volatile organic compounds (including PAHs) and PCBs if TPH is detected. (This Workplan will be updated if an alternative corrective action approach is selected). This Workplan will also include the proposed groundwater well installation and sampling, soil vapor sampling, and other data gaps that may come out of the ESA and SSI update. Potential data gaps cannot be fully known until the ESA and SSI documents are reviewed and the report updated. Our estimate may be updated based on the results of that review. Note: We have included costs for the 50-foot x 50-foot grid sampling and reporting as well as the sampling described by Section 7.3 of the Corrective Action Plan (seven locations extended to 3.5 feet below ground surface) under this scope item in the separately provided cost proposal. J. Groundwater Monitoring Roux will provide groundwater monitoring services, including installation, development, and surveying of up to three perimeter monitoring wells to evaluate contaminant concentrations and groundwater flow direction and gradient. Roux will conduct up to four quarterly or semi-annual sampling events and will prepare the associated monitoring reports. Monitoring will be designed to support remedial evaluation and regulatory coordination. Proposed well locations are shown on the Site Plan in Appendix A K. Soil Management Plan (SMP) Roux will prepare a SMP describing procedures to be implemented if previously unidentified contamination or subsurface structures (e.g., drums, underground storage tanks [USTs], septic systems) are encountered during construction. The SMP will define response actions, handling procedures, documentation requirements, and regulatory notification protocols. L. Soil Vapor Surveying Roux will conduct a post-grading soil vapor survey and methane survey beneath proposed future buildings and in the vicinity of the landfill area where elevated PCE concentrations were previously detected. Sampling will include up to 10 dual-nested soil vapor probes installed at depths of approximately 5 feet and 15 feet below ground surface as shown on the Site Plan in Appendix A. Soil vapor samples will be collected and analyzed for VOCs and methane. The soil vapor survey will not include testing of soil samples unless field screening indicates the presence of contamination. Results of testing will be evaluated relative to applicable screening levels and incorporated into remedial and CEQA documentation. M. Services Leading to a No Further Action Letter (NFA) Roux will provide regulatory coordination, engagement, and necessary support services to advance the project toward environmental closure (or equivalent) in compliance with applicable Local, State, and Federal requirements. Based on the site history, contaminants of concern, and anticipated corrective action framework, Roux recommends the following regulatory oversight structure: 1. Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD) Site Mitigation Unit (SMU): is the ideal lead regulatory agency because the operate quickly and accept reasonable solutions. Although they are not currently taking on new cases, this site is already an open case Page 1234 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 9 with SMU which is advantageous to the City. Therefore, SMU is the anticipated lead agency for oversight of soil vapor, soil, and groundwater remediation, corrective action approval, and issuance of a land use covenant (LUC), a NFA, or equivalent closure determination. 2. California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC): next choice for engagement to be evaluated if site conditions or selected remedies trigger DTSC jurisdiction. 3. Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB): third choice for engagement to be evaluated if site conditions or selected remedies trigger RWQCB jurisdiction. 4. SCAQMD: oversight of air quality-related requirements associated with excavation, remediation, and implementation of applicable SCAQMD rules. 5. California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM): regulates all oil and gas wells in California, including active, idle, abandoned, and orphan wells. Roux will interface with the appropriate oversight agency or agencies to confirm regulatory pathways, reporting requirements, and closure criteria applicable to the site. Roux will prepare and submit Closure Reports and supporting documentation required to obtain an NFA or equivalent regulatory determination, consistent with the continued commercial/industrial land use of the site. Development of sites containing abandoned oil wells is subject to review by the CalGEM to confirm that wells have been properly plugged and abandoned in accordance with applicable State standards. Structures are generally not permitted directly over oil wells unless CalGEM determines that the well poses no risk to public health, safety, or the environment, and re-abandonment may be required prior to construction. Roux will support the City by coordinating directly with CalGEM, reviewing available well records, and facilitating agency consultation as needed to confirm well status and address any CalGEM requirements applicable to the Project. Roux understands that, depending on the remediation method selected and residual site conditions, a formal NFA determination may not be achievable for all media. In such cases, Roux will assist the City with preparation and recordation of required environmental notifications or land-use restrictions, including deed restrictions or environmental covenants, through the Los Angeles County Recorder. These documents will identify residual contaminant conditions, required mitigation measures (such as engineered caps), and applicable land-use limitations, as required by the overseeing regulatory agency. Throughout this process, Roux will coordinate closely with City staff to ensure that regulatory closure strategies are clear, implementable, and fully consistent with CEQA documentation and long-term site management objectives. N. Optional – Monitoring During Construction If requested, Roux will provide comprehensive environmental monitoring services during demolition and construction activities in compliance with the MMRP, the approved SMP, applicable HASPs, and SCAQMD Rules 1150, 1166, 1403, and 1466. Monitoring services described under this optional task are subject to Task N assumptions and are not included unless specifically authorized and budgeted. Monitoring services may include hazardous building materials abatement monitoring during building demolition, as well as earthmoving monitoring during grading and construction. The structure demolition-phase monitoring may be conducted in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1403, including verification of asbestos survey completion, notification requirements, implementation of required emission control measures, and oversight of asbestos abatement activities, if present. Hazardous building materials abatement monitoring and hazardous materials removal monitoring will be performed under the direct supervision of a Certified Industrial Hygienists (CIHs) and/or other appropriately qualified environmental professionals (i.e., a Certified Asbestos Consultant and/or Lead Risk Assessor/Inspector), as applicable. Excavation monitoring will include oversight of soil handling, stockpiling, transport, and disposal activities, as well as implementation of air monitoring, emission controls, and work practices pursuant to SCAQMD Rules 1150, 1166, and 1466. Roux will document monitoring activities through daily field logs, monitoring reports, and regulatory notifications, as required, and will coordinate closely with the City, SMU, SCAQMD, and other applicable agencies to ensure demolition- and construction-phase environmental controls are implemented effectively and in accordance with approved plans, permits, and regulatory requirements. O. Optional – Geotechnical Services Roux’s trusted team member Hushmand Associates, Inc. (HAI) will provide geotechnical engineering support for the Project, under Roux’s project management and coordination. The geotechnical effort is structured to build efficiently upon existing subsurface data while performing targeted field exploration necessary to support current design, grading, foundation, and infiltration requirements. Page 1235 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 10 The work will begin with a review of available geotechnical information to develop a site‑specific understanding of subsurface conditions and identify data gaps relative to current California Building Code and ASCE 7‑22 seismic design requirements. Based on this review, HAI will perform targeted geotechnical exploration, including cone penetration testing, limited soil borings, and infiltration testing, designed to minimize site disturbance while providing data suitable for engineering analysis. Geotechnical analyses will address grading considerations, foundation support, seismic site classification, and infiltration feasibility consistent with anticipated project development. The results will be documented in a geotechnical report prepared by HAI that integrates new field data with existing information and provides practical, implementable recommendations to support project design and construction planning. Throughout Task O, Roux will serve as the primary point of contact for the City, coordinating subconsultant activities, managing interfaces with other technical disciplines, and ensuring that geotechnical recommendations are aligned with environmental constraints, CEQA documentation, and overall project objectives. P. Optional – Other CEQA-Related Services Optional Task – SoundPLAN Construction Noise Modeling If requested, the team will use SoundPLAN three‑dimensional noise modeling to evaluate construction noise with refined inputs such as receptor elevations, shielding, ground absorption, and equipment location assumptions, and will include modeled noise contours suitable for decision‑maker communication and CEQA documentation support. Optional Task – Preliminary Low Impact Development (LID) Plan If requested, the team will prepare a preliminary LID Plan consistent with the applicable NPDES permit requirements, selecting feasible BMP concepts using City‑provided geotechnical infiltration feasibility information and incorporating two rounds of City comments into a final preliminary submittal. Optional Task – Preliminary CEQA Findings Meeting The team will meet with City staff after completion of the technical studies to summarize key findings and provide a clear recommendation on whether an exemption is feasible prior to initiating the Initial Study. Optional Task – Exemption Memorandum If City staff elect to pursue an exemption, the team will document the basis for the exemption in a brief memorandum, prepare a draft Notice of Exemption, and support filing/posting activities as authorized by the City. Anticipated Deliverables: A. Technical Studies  Attendance at up to one in-person Kickoff Meeting ­ One electronic and up to ten hard copies of the Agenda ­ One electronic copy of the Meeting Minutes and one electronic copy of the revised minutes, as needed  One electronic copy of the VMT Screening Memo for Review and one electronic copy of a revised memo  One electronic copy of the modeling outputs for the Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emission/Energy analyses (to be appended to the Initial Study)  One electronic copy of the noise measurement and noise modeling outputs  One electronic copy of the Cultural and Paleontological Resources Memo  Native American Consultation Assistance: ­ Draft letters ­ Mailing Log B. Draft and Final DEQA Documents  One electronic copy and up to four hardcopies of the Administrative Draft IS/MND with Technical Appendices on USB drives for initial review  One electronic copy of and up to four hardcopies of the Screencheck Draft IS/MND with Technical Appendices on USB drives for second rounds review  One electronic copy and up to four hardcopies of the Public Review Draft IS/MND with Technical Appendices on USB drives for public review  Up to 25 hard copies of the NOA/NOI;  One electronic copy of each: Draft and Final Notice (NOA/NOI, NOC, NOD);  One electronic (ADA accessible) copy of the State Clearinghouse Submittal Package (to be posted via CEQASubmit by Michael Baker): ­ Public Review Draft IS/MND and Appendices ­ State Clearinghouse Summary Form ­ NOA/NOI ­ NOC C. Optional – Combined CEQA/NEPA  One electronic copy of the NEPA CE Memo and one electronic copy of a revised memo. D. MMRP  One electronic copy of the MMRP and one electronic copy of a revised MMRP. E. Public Outreach  PowerPoint Presentation assistance, as needed Page 1236 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 11  Attendance at up to three in-person public hearings F. Project Management  Meeting agendas and minutes  Action item tracking log  Coordination summaries with agencies, stakeholders, and the public  Periodic progress updates to City staff  Monthly invoices G. Hazardous Materials Studies Updated for Current Regulations i. ESAs and SSIs ­ Updated Phase II ESA and/or SSI Report ii. Hazardous Materials Surveys ­ Updated Lead Survey Report ­ Updated Asbestos Survey Report ­ Updated PCB Survey Report (if applicable) iii. HHRA ­ Updated HHRA ­ Executive summary suitable for CEQA inclusion iv. CAP  Updated CAP including evaluation of SCAQMD Rules 1166, 1466, and 1150  Demolition and construction monitoring plans  Hazardous building materials abatement monitoring specifications H. HASP  HASP I. Workplan Addendum to the CAP  CAP Workplan Addendum (includes 50-foot x 50- foot surface sampling; groundwater well installation, monitoring, and sampling; and soil vapor survey) J. Groundwater Monitoring  Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation and First Monitoring and Sampling Report  Groundwater Monitoring Reports (three quarterly/semi-annual) K. SMP  SMP L. Soil Vapor Surveying  Post-grading Soil Vapor Survey Report M. Services Leading to an NFA Letter  Regulatory coordination memoranda  CalGEM well records review and summary memorandum  Closure Reports submitted to oversight agencies  NFA or equivalent closure documentation (if achievable)  Deed restrictions or environmental covenants input (if required)  County Recorder filing documentation N. Monitoring During Demolition and Construction  Soils remediation and excavation monitoring logs  Air monitoring data and compliance documentation  Final Construction Environmental Monitoring Summary Report O. Optional – Geotechnical Services  Geotechnical Report P. Optional – Other CEQA-Related Services  Dependent on services selected Additional Services In addition to the Scope of Services identified in Items A through N, Roux can provide the following optional, value-added services to further support the City of Hermosa Beach, if requested. These services are not required to complete the Project but may be beneficial depending on project phasing, regulatory coordination needs, or future City objectives.  Post-Construction and Long-Term Site Management Support: Following completion of remediation and construction activities, Roux can assist the City with post-construction environmental support, including development and implementation of long-term operation, maintenance, and monitoring (OM&M) plans, post-closure monitoring programs, and periodic regulatory reporting. These services may be appropriate where engineered controls, land-use restrictions, or long-term monitoring obligations remain in place.  Environmental Support for Future Site Modifications: Roux can provide environmental evaluation and regulatory support for future site modifications, expansions, or changes in use that occur after project completion. This may include review of proposed improvements for consistency with recorded restrictions, evaluation of soil disturbance implications, and coordination with oversight agencies to maintain regulatory compliance.  On-Call Environmental Advisory and Rapid Response Services: Roux can provide as-needed, on-call environmental advisory services to support City staff during construction or future operations. These services may include rapid response to unforeseen environmental conditions, technical review of contractor submittals or change orders related to environmental issues, and coordination with regulatory agencies during unanticipated events. Page 1237 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 12  Enhanced Regulatory Strategy and Negotiation Support: Beyond standard closure coordination, Roux can support the City with advanced regulatory strategy development, including facilitation of agency negotiations, evaluation of alternative compliance pathways, and preparation of targeted technical memoranda to address complex or evolving regulatory concerns.  Data Management and Documentation Tools: Roux can develop project-specific environmental data management tools, including sampling databases, tracking spreadsheets, and summary dashboards, to assist the City with long-term documentation, regulatory tracking, and institutional knowledge retention.  Supplemental Community and Stakeholder Technical Support: Roux can support the City with additional community or stakeholder technical briefings beyond those required for the Project, including preparation of plain-language summaries, figures, or exhibits to support public transparency regarding site conditions, mitigation measures, or long-term management requirements. Roles and Responsibilities for City Staff Except as noted below, Roux will provide the professional services identified in the Scope of Work. Certain activities, approvals, and resources are expected to be provided by the City to support efficient project delivery. Work to Be Performed or Provided by the City Roux anticipates the City will provide the following resources, assistance, and actions necessary to complete the Scope of Services:  Designation of a City Project Manager and primary point of contact.  Timely review and consolidated comments on draft deliverables.  Direction regarding project priorities, phasing, and schedule adjustments.  Selection and approval of remedial alternatives, closure strategies, and land‑use assumptions.  Authorization for site access, including access to buildings, subsurface areas, and monitoring locations.  Coordination with City departments, tenants, and operations staff, as applicable.  Authorization to coordinate with regulatory agencies on the City’s behalf, as appropriate.  Provision of available historical environmental reports, prior regulatory correspondence, drawings, and as‑built information relevant to the site.  Disclosure of known site constraints, prior remedial actions, and institutional controls.  Lead role in formal communications with City commissions and City Council.  Issuance of official public notices and postings required by City procedures.  Participation in public meetings and hearings as required by CEQA and City process, with technical support provided by Roux and Michael Baker.  Execution of applications, agreements, and certifications that require City signature.  Filing documents with the County Clerk or County Recorder, with technical support from Roux as needed. Work not Included in Roux’s Scope of Work The following services, while referenced or implied within the Scope of Work, are not included in Roux’s scope and are assumed to be provided by the City or by others retained directly by the City, unless otherwise directed:  Geotechnical investigations, hydrology studies, and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs), consistent with Addendum 1 responses.  Architectural, civil, structural, or construction design services, including preparation of plans and specifications.  Construction, demolition, remediation, or abatement contracting services, including contractor means and methods.  Legal services, including preparation or review of legal instruments, except for technical support related to environmental covenants or deed restrictions.  Payment of permit fees, agency review fees, filing fees, or other regulatory fees, unless explicitly identified in the cost proposal.  Surveying services (boundary, topographic, or construction staking), except where incidental to environmental sampling location documentation. Roux will work collaboratively with City staff to integrate City-provided information and direction into the technical work. Roux will promptly notify the City if additional information, access, or decisions are required to maintain the project schedule or regulatory compliance. Page 1238 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 13 4 Project Management Plan The key to innovative, effective, and efficient project delivery is close coordination and communication between the City, the community, and the Consultant Team. Consistent with Roux’s established project management practices, our approach emphasizes proactive planning, transparent communications, disciplined scheduling, and a robust Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program that is applied consistently across all project phases. This plan is aligned with Roux’s corporate Quality Management Plan (QMP) and proven project execution methods used on public-sector environmental and infrastructure projects. Project Schedule Roux will implement a milestone-based project schedule that aligns with the Project Timeline identified in Section 1.2 of the RFP and supports timely decision-making by the City. The schedule is structured to allow efficient progression of tasks while accommodating agency review periods, City comment cycles, and public process requirements. Roux understands that this project involves both CEQA documentation and environmental investigation and remediation-related tasks, some of which may proceed concurrently. Where appropriate, Roux will perform tasks in parallel to reduce overall duration while maintaining regulatory compliance and quality control. The schedule will be refined in coordination with City staff following contract award and will be updated as needed to reflect City direction, agency review timelines, and field conditions. Roux will provide regular schedule updates and will promptly notify the City of any potential schedule impacts so that adjustments can be made proactively. Schedule Control and Coordination Roux will maintain schedule control through:  Clear task sequencing and milestone tracking  Regular coordination with City staff  Early identification of regulatory or field constraints  Efficient incorporation of City and agency comments This approach ensures that key deliverables are completed in a timely manner while maintaining flexibility to respond to evolving project needs. Anticipated Schedule for Key Deliverables Note: Certain tasks are dependent on City approvals, agency review timelines, and construction sequencing. The schedule will be adjusted as needed to remain consistent with the Project Timeline identified in the RFP. Page 1239 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 14 Communications Approach Roux’s communications philosophy is based on frequent, clear, and purposeful interactions to support informed decision-making and efficient project delivery. We view communication as an active management tool rather than a passive reporting function. City–Consultant Communications  Our designated Project Manager will act as the primary point of contact, supported by a Principal-level reviewer to ensure senior oversight and continuity.  Regular project check-ins, typically consisting of: ­ Weekly or biweekly status emails summarizing progress, upcoming tasks, and action items. ­ Biweekly or monthly coordination calls or virtual meetings to review schedule status, technical issues, and upcoming decisions.  Meetings conducted via virtual platforms as the default, with in-person meetings scheduled when beneficial for workshops, site walks, or key milestones, subject to City preference. Interdepartmental and Community Coordination  Communications protocols for coordination with other City departments, regulatory agencies, and community stakeholders will be established during individual project kick-off meetings.  Roux will support City-led community engagement by providing clear, technically accurate materials and participating in meetings as requested, ensuring that information is conveyed in an understandable and transparent manner.  This approach ensures consistent alignment among all parties while minimizing administrative burden and maintaining responsiveness throughout the project lifecycle. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Approach Roux will implement its established, companywide QA/QC program throughout the term of the agreement. This program is documented in Roux’s corporate Quality Management Plan and has been successfully applied across a wide range of public-sector projects. QA/QC Framework  Each task will have a designated, qualified Task Manager responsible for day-to-day quality control, operating under the oversight of the Project Manager and an appropriately qualified Principal-level reviewer.  Quality control procedures are applied to all aspects of work, including field activities, data management, technical analyses, calculations, and report preparation.  Roux’s internal review process includes independent technical and managerial reviews, often referred to as a “cold-eye” or peer review, to verify technical accuracy, regulatory compliance, and consistency with project objectives. Ensuring High-Quality Work  Clear definition of quality objectives and applicable regulatory and technical requirements at project initiation.  Training and mentoring of assigned personnel to ensure familiarity with project-specific procedures and quality expectations.  Verification that all team members, subcontractors, and suppliers understand and follow applicable QA/QC procedures.  Periodic audits and reviews of work products to confirm adherence to quality standards and to identify opportunities for continuous improvement. Page 1240 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 18 Figure 1: Proposed Organization Chart for City of Hermosa Beach RFP 26-003 City Yard Replacement Project Page 1241 of 1339 Appendix A Site Plan Page 1242 of 1339 VALLEY DRIVE(E) PARKING6TH STREETFORMER OIL WELL"STINNETT 1" TANK AREAFORMEROIL WELL"STINNETT 1"AREALEGENDAPPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARYAPPROXIMATE EXTENT OF FORMER LANDFILL AREAPROPOSED SOIL BORING LOCATIONSPROPOSED SOIL VAPOR LOCATIONSPROPOSED GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATIONSPrepared for:Title:Compiled by: Prepared by:Project Mgr:File:Date:Project:Scale:FIGURE1SITE PLAN WITH PROPOSED SOIL,SOIL VAPOR AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS555 6TH STREETHERMOSA BEACH, CACITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CAN.A.T.A.T.A.2026-03-161" = 40'NOTES1. SITE PLAN AND FORMER LANDFILL BOUNDARIES SOURCED FROM CORRECTIVEACTION PLAN PREPARED BY DUDEK, DATED SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 .Page 1243 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 52 of 56 7.2 Required Forms 7.2.1 Certification of Proposal RFP #: _________ The undersigned hereby submits its proposal and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal (RFP). 1. Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City has been or shall be compensated, directly or indirectly, in connection with this proposal or any work connected with this proposal. Should any agreement be approved in connection with this Request for Proposal, Proposer declares and warrants that no elected or appointed official, officer or employee of the City, during the term of his/her service with the City shall have any direct interest in that agreement, or obtain any present, anticipated or future material benefit arising therefrom. 2. By submitting the response to this request, Proposer agrees, if selected to furnish services to the City in accordance with this RFP. 3. Proposer has carefully reviewed its proposal and understands and agrees that the City is not responsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the Proposer and that the Proposer is responsible for them. 4. It is understood and agreed that the City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals and to waive any informality or irregularity in any proposal received by the City. 5. The proposal response includes all of the commentary, figures and data required by the Request for Proposal 6. The proposal shall be valid for 90 days from the date of submittal. 7. Proposer acknowledges that the City may issue addendums related to this RFP and that the proposer has reviewed the following addendums which have been issued: Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ Addendum: _____________________________ 8. Proposer further acknowledges the provisions of any addendums issued have been incorporated into their proposal. 26-003 No. 1 Page 1244 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 53 of 56 Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ Nancy Anglin, PE, Principal Engineer/Operations Manager Page 1245 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 54 of 56 7.2.2 Non-Collusion Affidavit RFP #: _________ The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1.This proposal is not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation. 2.This proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham. 3. I have not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Proposer to put in a false or sham proposal and I have not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any other Proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal or to refrain from submitting to this RFP. 4. I have not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price or to fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the proposal price or to secure any advantage against the City of Hermosa Beach or of anyone interested in the proposed contract. 5.All statements contained in the Proposal and related documents are true. 6. I have not directly or indirectly submitted the proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any person, corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, RFP depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. 7. I have not entered into any arrangement or agreement with any City of Hermosa Beach public officer in connection with this proposal. 8. I understand collusive bidding is a violation of State and Federal law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ 26-003 Nancy Anglin, PE, Principal Engineer/Operations Manager Page 1246 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 55 of 56 7.2.3 Compliance with Insurance Requirements RFP #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with the City s insurance requirements contained within this RFP. The undersigned declares states and certifies that: 1.Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the insurance requirements as specified in the Request for Proposal. 2.If selected, proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein. Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ 26-003 Nancy Anglin, PE, Principal Engineer/Operations Manager Page 1247 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach Page 56 of 56 7.2.4 Acknowledgement of Professional Services Agreement RFP #: _________ The selected consultant will be expected to comply with and sign the City s Professional Services Agreement. Proposers should identify and/or indicate any exceptions to the Sample Professional Services Agreement included in Section 6.2. The City Attorney or their designee retains the discretion to accept or reject proposed exceptions or modifications to the City s Professional Services Agreement. 1.Proposer agrees, acknowledges and is fully aware of the conditions specified in the City’s Sample Professional Services Agreement. 2.Proposer agrees to accept all conditions and requirements as contained therein with exceptions noted as follows: ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Representative: ____________________________________________ Printed Name and Title: ____________________________________________ 26-003 Nancy Anglin, PE, Principal Engineer/Operations Manager Page 1248 of 1339 Page 4 of 4 City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 RFQ 26-003 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL ACT (CEQA) PROJECT ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY YARD REPLACEMENT PROJECT Complete and sign this acknowledgement form. Submit and enclose the acknowledgement in your proposal. Failure to do so may result in disqualification of your firm’s proposal. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of Addendum No. 1 dated March 5, 2025. ATTEST: _____________________________________ Principal: _____________________________________ Address: _____________________________________ By: _____________________________________ Title: _____________________________________ Nancy Anglin, PE Principal Engineer | Operations Manager 5150 East Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 450, Long Beach, CA 90804 Nancy Anglin, PE Page 1249 of 1339 PSA No. City of Hermosa Beach Page 19 of 19 EXHIBIT B COST PROPOSAL Page 1250 of 1339 City Yard Project - CEQA Services Cost Summary Task Amount Task A – Technical Studies $73,900 Task B – Draft and Final CEQA Documents $56,400 Task D – MMRP $2,300 Task E – Public Outreach $9,500 Task F – Project Management $43,500 Task G – Hazardous Materials Studies $53,800 Task H – HASP $2,700 Task I – Workplan Addendum to CAP $39,000 Task J – Groundwater Monitoring $88,700 Task K – SMP $5,600 Tasl L – Soil Vapor Sampling $52,400 Task O – Geotechnical Support $36,500 Task P – Other CEQA Related Services $34,500 TOTAL $498,800 Optional services to be revisited if required. Task Amount Task C – Optional Combined CEQA/NEPA $12,700 Task M – Services Leading to a NFA $15,500 Task N – Optional Monitoring During Construction $2,100 TOTAL $30,300 Page 1251 of 1339 COST ESTIMATING SPREADSHEET - ROUX LA Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost LABOR Office COSTS Principals Nancy Anglin, Catie Boston, and Jay Shipley hr $265 10 $2,650 6 $1,590 $0 1 $265 40 $10,600 14 $3,710 1 $265 4 $1,060 6 $1,590 1 $265 2 $530 20 $5,300 105 $27,825 Technical Director hr $245 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 Senior II David DeVries hr $240 16 $3,840 12 $2,880 1 $240 2 $480 40 $9,600 34 $8,160 1 $240 10 $2,400 20 $4,800 4 $960 4 $960 20 $4,800 164 $39,360 Senior I hr $210 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 22 $4,620 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 22 $4,620 Project hr $155 16 $2,480 12 $1,860 1 $155 2 $310 40 $6,200 50 $7,750 8 $1,240 16 $2,480 40 $6,200 6 $930 10 $1,550 20 $3,100 221 $34,255 Staff II hr $140 $0 $0 $0 $0 20 $2,800 62 $8,680 $0 32 $4,480 36 $5,040 20 $2,800 20 $2,800 $0 190 $26,600 Staff I hr $135 $0 $0 $0 $0 20 $2,700 20 $2,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 40 $5,400 Senior H&S Manager hr $165 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 $330 2 $330 $0 $0 1 $165 2 $330 $0 7 $1,155 Drafter hr $115 2 $230 2 $230 $0 $0 20 $2,300 17 $1,955 1 $115 10 $1,150 10 $1,150 2 $230 4 $460 10 $1,150 78 $8,970 Word Processor hr $115 6 $690 6 $690 $0 1 $115 20 $2,300 23 $2,645 4 $460 16 $1,840 12 $1,380 2 $230 2 $230 10 $1,150 102 $11,730 Field Project hr $155 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 28 $4,340 $0 10 $1,550 $0 38 $5,890 Staff II hr $140 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 16 $2,240 32 $4,480 $0 50 $7,000 $0 98 $13,720 Staff I hr $135 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 16 $2,160 $0 $0 $0 $0 16 $2,160 Senior H&S Manager hr $165 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 4 $660 $0 2 $330 $0 6 $990 OTHER Equipment Costs and Fees DIRECT Field Truck Daily $250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 2 $500 7 $1,750 $0 5 $1,250 $0 14 $3,500 COSTS Disposable Materials Daily $53 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 2 $106 7 $371 $0 3 $159 $0 12 $636 PID - MiniRAE Daily $125 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 2 $250 2 $250 $0 3 $375 $0 7 $875 Hand Auger Daily $32 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 2 $64 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 $64 Slide Hammer Daily $27 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 2 $54 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 $54 Water Level Meter Daily $42 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 4 $168 $0 $0 $0 4 $168 Battery Generator Daily $53 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 4 $212 $0 $0 $0 4 $212 GPS - Trimble Daily $360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 1 $360 $0 $0 1 $360 $0 2 $720 55-gal Drum Unit $80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 1 $80 $0 $0 1 $80 $0 2 $160 Groundwater Pump and Parameter Monitoring Equipment Unit $350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 4 $1,400 $0 $0 $0 4 $1,400 SCAQMD Notifications (Rules 1166 and 1466)Unit $90 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 1 $90 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $90 SCAQMD Rule 1150 Plan Filing Fee Unit $196 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 1 $196 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $196 Permit Fees (5+ borings deeper than 10 feet)Unit $406 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $406 $0 1 $406 LACDPH Permit Fees (1 - 10 wells) - GWM Wells Unit $735 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 1 $735 $0 $0 $0 1 $735 Task H Task M HASP Workplan Addendum to CAP (includes performing 50' x 50' surface sampling, 7.3 sampling, and reporting) Groundwater Monitoring (includes four reports) Task I Task J Task K SMP Services Leading to an NFA Task L Soil Vapor SurveyingMMRP Public Outreach Project Management Hazardous Materials Studies (see attched detail) Task F Task G ROUX COST ESTIMATE City of Hermosa Beach RFP# 26-003 CEQA Project Analysis and Other Environmental Services for the City Yard Replacement Project UNITS RATE (per unit) Task A Task B Task D Task E ESTIMATED TOTAL COSTSTechnical Studies Draft & Final CEQA Documents 1 of 2 5/13/2026Page 1252 of 1339 COST ESTIMATING SPREADSHEET - ROUX LA Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Task H Task M HASP Workplan Addendum to CAP (includes performing 50' x 50' surface sampling, 7.3 sampling, and reporting) Groundwater Monitoring (includes four reports) Task I Task J Task K SMP Services Leading to an NFA Task L Soil Vapor SurveyingMMRP Public Outreach Project Management Hazardous Materials Studies (see attched detail) Task F Task G ROUX COST ESTIMATE City of Hermosa Beach RFP# 26-003 CEQA Project Analysis and Other Environmental Services for the City Yard Replacement Project UNITS RATE (per unit) Task A Task B Task D Task E ESTIMATED TOTAL COSTSTechnical Studies Draft & Final CEQA Documents SUBS Subconsultants Michael Baker & Associates $63,915 $49,084 $1,850 $8,250 $6,975 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FALSE Titan Environmental $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,112 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,112 Geotechnical Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subcontractors Geophysical: GPRS Job $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0.5 $2,000 0.5 $2,000 $0 1 $4,000 $0 2 $8,000 GWM Well Survey (GeoTracker): Calvada Job $4,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 1 $4,500 $0 $0 $0 1 $4,500 Driller: Cascade Cascade Env. GWM Well Install/Development Job $29,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 1 $29,500 $0 $0 $0 1 $29,500 Cascade Env. Post-Grading SV Survey Job $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $15,000 $0 1 $15,000 Mobile Lab - H&P Job $13,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $13,000 $0 1 $13,000 IDW Drum Removal/Non-Haz Disposal (30 Drums): Costera Job $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 1 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 1 $6,500 IDW Drum Removal/Non-Haz Disposal (6 Drums): Costera Job $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 $2,000 $0 1 $2,000 Pace Laboratory VOCs + Oxygenates - 8260 Sample $107 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 25 $2,675 $0 $0 $0 25 $2,675 TPH Finger print Non Standard Fuels(Mineral spirits, kerosene, diesel fuel, fuel oil #6, hydraulic fluid, motor oil)Sample $107 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 31 $3,317 25 $2,675 $0 $0 $0 56 $5,992 SVOCs - 8270C Sample $202 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 10 $2,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 10 $2,020 PCBs 8082 Sample $90 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 10 $900 $0 $0 $0 $0 10 $900 ICP Single Metal - 6010/200.7 Sample $10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 40 $400 $0 $0 $0 $0 40 $400 ICP/MS Single Metal - 6010/200.8 Sample $11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 40 $440 $0 $0 $0 $0 40 $440 Title 22 (CAM17) metals (Includes Digestion) - 6010/7470/7471Sample $120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 56 $6,720 25 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 81 $9,720 TCLP Extraction Fee - 1311 Sample $60 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 20 $1,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 20 $1,200 STLC Extraction Fee - Title 22 EPA WET Sample $60 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 20 $1,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 20 $1,200 Chloride Sample $28 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 24 $672 $0 $0 $0 24 $672 pH Sample $27 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 31 $837 24 $648 $0 $0 $0 55 $1,485 Dissolved Solids (TDS)Sample $32 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 24 $768 $0 $0 $0 24 $768 Settleable Solids (TSS)Sample $32 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 24 $768 $0 $0 $0 24 $768 Sample Disposal Charge per sample Sample $7 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 52 $364 25 $175 $0 $0 $0 77 $539 Environmental Management Fee (one per invoice) Sample $25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 1 $25 4 $100 $0 $0 $0 5 $125 CA EDD GeoTracker Each $25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 4 $100 $0 $0 $0 4 $100 TOTAL LABOR - HOURS 50 38 2 6 200 244 17 120 188 36 106 80 1087 TOTAL LABOR - COSTS $9,890 $7,250 $395 $1,170 $36,500 $40,550 $2,650 $17,810 $29,640 $5,580 $15,740 $15,500 $182,675 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COSTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,700 $4,886 $0 $2,630 $0 $9,216 TOTAL SUBCONTRACTS $63,915 $49,084 $1,850 $8,250 $6,975 $13,112 $0 $19,423 $54,081 $0 $34,000 $0 $250,690 SUBTOTAL $73,805 $56,334 $2,245 $9,420 $43,475 $53,662 $2,650 $38,933 $88,607 $5,580 $52,370 $15,500 $442,581 TOTAL COSTS - ROUNDED $100 $73,900 $56,400 $2,300 $9,500 $43,500 $53,800 $2,700 $39,000 $88,700 $5,600 $52,400 $15,500 $443,300 2 of 2 5/13/2026Page 1253 of 1339 COST ESTIMATING SPREADSHEET - ROUX LA Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost LABOR Office COSTS Principals Nancy Anglin, Catie Boston, and Jay Shipley hr $265 4 $1,060 2 $530 4 $1,060 4 $1,060 Technical Director hr $245 $0 $0 $0 $0 Senior II David DeVries hr $240 20 $4,800 2 $480 6 $1,440 6 $1,440 Senior I hr $210 $0 $0 22 $4,620 $0 Project hr $155 20 $3,100 4 $620 10 $1,550 16 $2,480 Staff II hr $140 $0 $0 42 $5,880 20 $2,800 Staff I hr $135 20 $2,700 $0 $0 $0 Senior H&S Manager hr $165 $0 2 $330 $0 $0 Drafter hr $115 12 $1,380 $0 $0 5 $575 Word Processor hr $115 12 $1,380 $0 6 $690 5 $575 Field Staff I hr $135 $0 $0 $0 $0 OTHER Equipment Costs and Fees DIRECT Field Truck Daily $250 $0 $0 $0 $0 COSTS SUBS Subconsultants Titan Environmental Event $13,112 $0 $13,112 $0 $0 TOTAL LABOR - HOURS 88 10 90 56 TOTAL LABOR - COSTS $14,420 $1,960 $15,240 $8,930 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COSTS $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL SUBCONTRACTS $0 $13,112 $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $14,420 $15,072 $15,240 $8,930 TOTAL COSTS - ROUNDED $100 $14,500 $15,100 $15,300 $9,000 Task G. iv. RATE (per unit) Task G. i.Task G. ii.Task G. iii ROUX COST ESTIMATE TASK G DETAIL City of Hermosa Beach RFP# 26-003 CEQA Project Analysis and Other Environmental Services for the City Yard Replacement Project ESA and SSI HBMS HHRA CAP UNITS 1 of 1 5/13/2026Page 1254 of 1339 COST ESTIMATING SPREADSHEET - ROUX LA Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost LABOR Office COSTS Principals Nancy Anglin, Catie Boston, and Jay Shipley hr $265 2 $530 $0 4 $1,060 4 $1,060 Technical Director hr $245 $0 $0 $0 $0 Senior II David DeVries hr $240 2 $480 0.5 $120 6 $1,440 4 $960 Senior I hr $210 $0 $0 $0 $0 Project hr $155 4 $620 0.5 $78 10 $1,550 8 $1,240 Staff II hr $140 $0 0.5 $70 4 $560 $0 Staff I hr $135 $0 $0 $0 $0 Senior H&S Manager hr $165 $0 $0 $0 $0 Drafter hr $115 $0 $0 $0 $0 Word Processor hr $115 $0 $0 $0 6 $690 Field Staff II hr $140 $0 10 $1,400 $0 $0 Staff I hr $135 $0 $0 10 $1,350 $0 OTHER Equipment Costs and Fees DIRECT Field Truck Daily $250 $0 1 $250 1 $250 $0 COSTS Disposable Materials Daily $53 $0 1 $53 1 $53 $0 PID - MiniRAE Daily $125 $0 1 $125 1 $125 $0 Markup on equipment costs 0%$0 $0 $0 $0 ROUX COST ESTIMATE OPTIONAL SERVICES City of Hermosa Beach RFP# 26-003 CEQA Project Analysis and Other Environmental Services for the City Yard Replacement Project UNITS RATE (per unit) Task C Task N Task O Task P Optional Combined - CEQA/NEPA Optional - Monitoring During Construction Optional - Geotechnical Support Optional - Other CEQA- Related Services 1 of 2 5/13/2026Page 1255 of 1339 COST ESTIMATING SPREADSHEET - ROUX LA Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost Units Est. Cost ROUX COST ESTIMATE OPTIONAL SERVICES City of Hermosa Beach RFP# 26-003 CEQA Project Analysis and Other Environmental Services for the City Yard Replacement Project UNITS RATE (per unit) Task C Task N Task O Task P Optional Combined - CEQA/NEPA Optional - Monitoring During Construction Optional - Geotechnical Support Optional - Other CEQA- Related Services SUBS Subconsultants Michael Baker & Associates $10,980 TBD $0 $30,455 Titan Environmental $0 TBD $0 $0 Geotechnical Services $0 TBD $29,713 $0 Subcontractors VOCs + Oxygenates - 8260 Sample $107 $0 $0 1 $107 $0 TPH Finger print Non Standard Fuels(Mineral spirits, kerosene, diesel fuel, fuel oil #6, hydraulic fluid, motor oil)Sample $107 $0 $0 1 $107 $0 Title 22 (CAM17) metals (Includes Digestion) - 6010/7470/7471Sample $120 $0 $0 1 $120 $0 Markup on subcontractor invoices 0%$0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL LABOR - HOURS 8 12 34 22 TOTAL LABOR - COSTS $1,630 $1,668 $5,960 $3,950 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COSTS $0 $428 $428 $0 TOTAL SUBCONTRACTS $10,980 TBD $30,047 $30,455 SUBTOTAL $12,610 $2,096 $36,435 $34,405 TOTAL COSTS - ROUNDED $100 $12,700 $2,100 $36,500 $34,500 2 of 2 5/13/2026Page 1256 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 1 Assumptions/Data Needs General 1. We understand that the City’s plans for this Project are still evolving. Our estimate reflects our understanding of the Project at this time. Roux and our Subconsultants reserve the right to update our estimate as the City’s plans for the Project are updated, and regulatory requirements are better understood. 2. Soil, soil vapor, groundwater, and/or indoor air sampling that may be required if the storage facility at 552 11th Place, Hermosa Beach, is included in the City Project are not included in this cost estimate. This exclusion applies to soil, soil vapor, groundwater, and indoor air environmental sampling only and does not apply to hazardous building materials surveys addressed under Task G.ii. 3. For all deliverables, two rounds of comment responses are included. This anticipates one consolidated set of comments to draft documents will be provided from the City of Hermosa Beach, Public Works Department (City) and one consolidated set of comments to draft documents will be provided from the regulatory oversight agency. 4. Regulatory agency review durations are outside Roux’s control and are assumed to occur within reasonable timeframes consistent with past practice. 5. All field services will be performed under the direct supervision of an appropriately experienced California-licensed Professional Geologist (PG), Professional Civil Engineer (PE), or a professional licensed and/or experienced with the service being performed. 6. The City will provide timely site access, right‑of‑entry permissions, and coordination with City staff, contractors, and security personnel as needed to support field activities. Delays resulting from access constraints may require schedule or cost adjustments. 7. The oversight agency will be notified at least seven days prior to planned field sampling events. 8. At least three days prior to each field event Roux will mark sampling locations and notify Underground Service Alert of Southern California (DigAlert) to identify utilities in the sampling vicinity. 9. Prior to ground disturbance, Roux will perform a geophysical survey to identify subsurface utilities or other infrastructure. Roux will also review available as-built plans provided by the City. 10. Weather delays, unsafe field conditions, or force majeure events that prevent or interrupt field activities are not included and may require schedule and/or cost adjustments. 11. Roux will not be responsible for damage to utilities not identified by DigAlert, geophysical survey, or site as-built plans. Task A 12. City staff will select the preferred development option prior to CEQA kickoff. 13. Includes one in‑person kick‑off meeting, agenda, and meeting minutes/action items memorandum. 14. Includes one site visit and photo documentation at 555 6th Street. 15. City will provide available project information needed to finalize the Project Description (site plan, conceptual site plan, proposed construction approach, and anticipated approvals/permits). 16. Project funding source is not finalized; NEPA applicability is treated as an optional task. 17. Transportation scope is limited to a VMT Screening Memo with custom trip generation; a full VMT analysis is excluded. 18. Air quality, GHG, and energy quantification will use CalEEMod (v2022.1); City (or representative) will provide construction phasing and grading/excavation/paving quantities. 19. Air analysis assumes remediation hauling may occur and may include export to hazardous waste landfills approximately 200 miles or further; haul assumptions require City confirmation. 20. Noise monitoring includes up to four short‑term measurements (approx. 10 minutes each). 21. Cultural/paleontological scope assumes the site is fully developed/primarily paved; archaeological and paleontological field surveys are not included. 22. AB 52 scope is limited to preparing and sending invitation letters and maintaining a mailing log; City leads any government‑to‑government consultation meetings. 23. Two submittals (draft/final) are included for the VMT Screening Memo; more than two requires an addendum. 24. Includes up to 12 meetings (virtual or in‑person, each up to one hour). Page 1257 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 2 Task B 25. This task includes preparation of either a Categorical Exemption (if determined feasible) or a standalone Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). Evaluation of exemption feasibility will occur after completion of the Task A Project Description and Technical Studies. 26. Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is excluded. If an EIR is later determined to be required, it will be provided under a separate scope and fee. 27. IS/MND preparation includes the following deliverable stages: o Administrative Draft o Screencheck Draft (incorporating one consolidated set of City comments) o Public Review Draft (final City edits incorporated) o Final IS/MND, including responses to comments, errata (if required), and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). 28. The City‑approved Project Description is assumed to remain stable following approval. Material changes to the Project Description after approval may require revisions to scope, schedule, and cost. 29. Responses to public and agency comments are budgeted assuming up to 40 total labor hours. Additional response effort, expanded comment volume, or supplemental technical analysis may require additional authorization. 30. Public review distribution assumes up to 25 hard copies of the Notice of Availability/Notice of Intent (NOA/NOI). Radius mailing and newspaper notices are the responsibility of the City. 31. CEQA notices and filings (NOA/NOI, Notice of Completion, Notice of Determination, and State Clearinghouse submittals) will be prepared and filed as described in the scope, subject to City review and approval. 32. Regulatory agency and State Clearinghouse review durations are outside the Consultant’s control and may affect schedule. Task C 33. This optional task is triggered only if federal funding is pursued or awarded for the Project. 34. NEPA applicability and the appropriate level of documentation will be confirmed in coordination with the City and the federal lead agency. 35. The scope assumes the Project will qualify for a Categorical Exclusion (CE) under NEPA. 36. Preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is excluded. 37. The existing CEQA Initial Study technical analyses will be used as the primary basis for NEPA documentation. 38. The scope includes preparation of a NEPA Categorical Exclusion memorandum and one revised version responding to agency comments. 39. The estimated level of effort is preliminary; actual effort may vary based on federal lead agency requirements and review procedures. 40. Additional NEPA‑specific technical studies, agency consultations, or documentation beyond a CE are excluded and would require separate authorization. 41. Federal agency review timelines and concurrence are outside the Consultant’s control and may affect schedule.. Task D 42. MMRP is based on mitigation measures and/or conditions of approval identified in the IS/MND. 43. Includes one draft and one revised electronic MMRP deliverable. Task E 44. Includes attendance at up to three in‑person public hearings (e.g., Planning Commission/City Council). 45. Public scoping meeting attendance is excluded (EIR not included). 46. Additional hearings/outreach beyond three are excluded and would be time‑and‑materials under separate authorization. Page 1258 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 3 Task F 47. Includes ongoing task management and coordination by the Project Manager/Project Director. 48. Includes up to 15 bi‑weekly virtual check‑in meetings (and weekly meetings if deemed necessary); additional meetings are excluded and would be time‑and‑materials. Task G.ii. 49. The hazardous building materials surveys will be performed by Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (TES) under Roux’s project management and coordination. 50. The scope includes a supplemental asbestos and lead‑containing materials survey at 555 6th Street and a full asbestos and lead‑containing materials demolition survey at 552 11th Place (Hermosa Beach Self Storage). 51. Surveys are limited to accessible and observable building materials and consist of visual inspection and representative sampling of suspect asbestos‑containing and lead‑containing materials. 52. The supplemental survey at 555 6th Street is limited to addressing data gaps in prior surveys and is not intended to replace a comprehensive hazardous materials survey. 53. Concealed, inaccessible, or obstructed materials (including materials within walls, ceilings, floors, or mechanical systems) are excluded and may not be identified. 54. Sampling will be conducted on a representative basis for homogeneous materials in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations. 55. The team will collect up to 265 bulk asbestos samples for analysis by polarized light microscopy (PLM) and up to four lead bulk samples for waste profiling analyses, including Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC), Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration using the Waste Extraction Test (STLC/WET), and the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP), as applicable. 56. Estimated quantities and sample counts are based on the conditions observed at the time of the survey. Additional sampling, analytical methods, or field time beyond those identified in the scope of services are not included and would require additional authorization. 57. The surveys do not include abatement design, abatement oversight, clearance or perimeter air monitoring, dust wipe sampling, or universal waste surveys. Task G.iii. 58. Vapor intrusion risks to indoor commercial workers were previously evaluated as de minimis in the 2018 Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA). However, site conditions, regulatory expectations, and the available dataset have evolved since completion of the 2018 HHRA. Accordingly, potential vapor intrusion risks associated with current or future site conditions cannot be fully evaluated until the HHRA is updated. As part of that update, indoor air sampling and/or vapor intrusion evaluation may be recommended for the existing structure that will remain. Costs for this sampling are not included in the cost proposal. Task G.iv. 59. Potential data gaps cannot be fully known until the Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI) documents are reviewed in detail and the reports updated. Our Corrective Action Plan (CAP) scope and estimate may be updated based on the results of the Task G.i. review. Task I 60. Potential data gaps cannot be fully known until the ESA and SSI documents are reviewed in detail and the report updated. Our Workplan scope and estimate may be updated based on the results of Task G.i. review. 61. Indoor air sampling is not included. It is anticipated that indoor air sampling may be required for each structure post ‑construction and can be performed for an additional fee. 62. It is unclear from the Request for Proposals (RFP) if the 50-foot by 50-foot surface soil sampling implementation is required as part of this scope of work. We have included costs for that activity under this scope item. 63. The surface sampling will be performed after demolition, but prior to future grading. Page 1259 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 4 64. Up to 26 surface samples will be collected from the upper 6 inches of soil using a hand auger and slide hammer. These samples will be analyzed for Title 22 metals, acidity (pH), and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH), with additional analyses for semi- Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs), including Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), if TPH is detected. 65. Per Section 7.3 of the CAP (Dudek, 2019), up to seven locations from within the former landfilled area will be extended to 3.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). Samples will be collected at 1-1.5, 2-2.5, and 3-3.5 feet bgs (21 samples). These samples will be analyzed for Title 22 metals and soluble and leachable metals as needed. Sampling depths and locations assume demolition activities do not exceed planned limits; changes to grading depth or extent may require revisions to sampling scope and cost. 66. Up to five duplicate samples and four blank samples will be collected. 67. Up to 10 samples will require PAH and PCB analyses. 68. Up to 20 samples will require soluble and/or leachable analyses. 69. VOC analysis is excluded unless specifically requested by the City or regulatory agency following review of screening results. 70. Investigation derived waste (IDW) will be containerized in Department of Transportation (DOT)- approved drums and left in a secure on site location provided by the City. 71. IDW is assumed to be non‑hazardous based on historical data. Reclassification resulting from analytical results may require cost adjustments. 72. IDW will be removed in one event after all field investigations are completed, unless regulatory or disposal facility requirements dictate otherwise. Task J 73. Depth to groundwater is expected to be approximately 50 feet bgs; therefore, the groundwater monitoring wells will extend to approximately 60 feet bgs (i.e., 10 feet below where groundwater is first encountered). These depths may change based on observed field conditions. 74. Soil will be logged in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and field screened with a photo- ionization detector (PID). Soil samples will not be collected for analytical testing unless field screening indicates the presence of contamination. 75. The wells will be completed with traffic rated well boxes, the wellheads will be surveyed in accordance with the requirements of State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) GeoTracker website, and the wells will be developed using the surge and bail method. 76. Four events of groundwater monitoring and sampling will be conducted. 77. The City will provide continued access to monitoring wells for the sampling events. 78. Up to three groundwater samples, one duplicate sample, and two blank samples (six total) will be collected each event and analyzed for TPHs, VOCs, pH, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Chloride, and Title 22 metals. 79. IDW will be containerized in DOT-approved drums and left in a secure on-site location provided by the City. 80. One composite soil sample will be collected from the waste drums and analyzed for TPH, VOCs, and Title 22 metals for waste profiling. 81. IDW is assumed to be non‑hazardous based on historical data. Reclassification resulting from analytical results may require cost adjustments. 82. IDW will be removed in one event after all field investigations are completed, unless regulatory or disposal facility requirements dictate otherwise. 83. Groundwater monitoring well destruction and abandonment costs are not included and, if requested, will be provided under a separate scope. Task L 84. Up to 10 temporary dual nested soil vapor probes will be installed with probe tips at approximately 5 and 15 feet bgs. 85. Soil vapor samples will be analyzed for VOCs and methane. 86. Soil samples will not be analyzed unless required by regulator direction or observed field conditions. Page 1260 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 5 Task M 87. Regulatory agency requirements are difficult to predict at this time. After the regulatory oversight agency is determined and their requirements better understood, these estimated fees will be re-evaluated. 88. Regulatory agency fees and requirements may vary by agency. Any additional agency ‑specific fees or requirements beyond those currently identified are excluded. Task N 89. The day rate presented in the cost table applies only to Roux professional staff time for oversight, coordination, documentation, and regulatory interface functions as specifically directed by the City. Weekly rates can be provided upon request. 90. The day rate does not include subconsultant field oversight or monitoring services. 91. The day rate does not include sampling and analytical testing or the use of field equipment beyond standard tools and a photo- ionization detector (PID). 92. There is a one-time South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Various Locations Rule 1166 and Rule 1466 notification fee of $81.61 each (as of 2026). A Site-Specific Rule 1166 Plan is not expected and, therefore, not included in our costs. If required, a Site-Specific Rule 1166 Plan and fee will be provided for an additional fee. There is an SCAQMD Rule 1150 Plan Filing Fee of $195.38 (as of 2026). Those fees have not been included in the day rate, but are included in our cost proposal under the CAP. If those fees are not incurred, the City will not be invoiced for them. Task O 93. This task includes geotechnical engineering services performed by Hushmand Associates, Inc. (HAI) under Roux’s project management and coordination. 94. The scope assumes review of one existing geotechnical report provided by the City, supplemented by targeted field exploration to address identified data gaps necessary to meet current California Building Code (CBC) and ASCE 7 ‑22 requirements. 95. Subsurface exploration is limited to up to five cone penetration test (CPT) soundings to depths ranging from approximately 50 to 100 feet, up to one soil boring to approximately 50 feet below ground surface (bgs), and up to two shallow infiltration tests. 96. CPT and boring locations assume reasonable access and standard site conditions. Relocation of exploration points due to utilities, environmental constraints, or field conditions may require additional coordination, time, or cost adjustments. 97. Field exploration assumes: o No traffic control is required. o A conventional truck‑mounted drill rig can be used. o Limited‑access drilling rigs are not required 98. Underground Service Alert (USA) notification and geophysical utility clearance are included. Removal of utility markings or restoration related to exploratory activities is not included. 99. Laboratory testing is limited to engineering classification and geotechnical properties required for grading, foundation, seismic site class, and infiltration analyses. Final laboratory testing selection may vary based on subsurface conditions encountered. 100. Environmental characterization, hazardous materials evaluation, and remediation are expressly excluded from the geotechnical scope. 101. Well abandonment, long‑term groundwater monitoring wells, dewatering analysis, construction materials testing, and special inspection services are not included in this task. 102. One draft geotechnical report and response to one consolidated set of review comments are included. Additional revisions or expanded analyses will be provided under a separate scope. Page 1261 of 1339 RFP 26-003 City of Hermosa Beach www.rouxinc.com 6 Task P Optional Task – SoundPLAN Construction Noise Modeling 103. This task is optional and will be performed only if specifically requested by the City. 104. The scope includes use of SoundPLAN three‑dimensional noise modeling software to refine construction noise impact analysis at sensitive receptors. 105. Modeling inputs will be based on information available at the time of analysis, including construction equipment assumptions, durations, and site geometry provided by the City or its design team. 106. The task includes preparation of modeled noise contour exhibits suitable for inclusion in CEQA documentation. 107. This task does not include additional noise monitoring, changes to construction means and methods, or revisions to previously completed noise analyses unless separately authorized. Optional Task – Preliminary Low Impact Development (LID) Plan 108. This task is optional and will be performed only if requested by the City. 109. The scope includes preparation of a preliminary LID Plan consistent with applicable NPDES permit requirements. 110. The LID Plan will rely on City‑provided geotechnical data regarding infiltration feasibility; additional infiltration testing or geotechnical services are excluded. 111. The scope assumes hydromodification requirements do not apply and that stormwater will discharge to the municipal storm drain system. 112. Up to two rounds of City review comments are included; additional revisions are excluded and would require separate authorization. 113. Final engineering design, construction drawings, and agency permitting for LID features are not included. Optional Task – Preliminary CEQA Findings Meeting 114. This task is optional and will be performed only if requested by the City following completion of Task A Technical Studies. 115. The scope includes one meeting with City staff to summarize technical study findings and discuss whether a CEQA exemption may be feasible. 116. This task is advisory in nature and does not include preparation of formal CEQA documentation or regulatory determinations. 117. Additional meetings, follow‑up analyses, or written documentation beyond the meeting summary are excluded unless separately authorized. Optional Task – Exemption Memorandum 118. This task is optional and will be performed only if City staff elect to pursue a CEQA exemption based on the findings discussed under the Preliminary CEQA Findings Meeting. 119. The scope includes preparation of a brief exemption memorandum and a draft Notice of Exemption (NOE). 120. Filing and posting of the NOE will be supported only as authorized by the City; public noticing and discretionary approvals remain the City’s responsibility. 121. This task does not include preparation of an Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or Environmental Impact Report. If an exemption cannot be supported, preparation of CEQA documentation will proceed under Task B. Page 1262 of 1339 AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FORCITY YARD CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PROJECT ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES May 26, 2026 Page 1263 of 1339 Background FY 25-26 Partially Funds CIP 615 New City Yard Sept. 9, 2025 Council directed staff to advance: 1.Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Owner’s Representative (OR) Services – awarded at Council January 13, 2026 2.Advance Project Programming – in process. Project kick- off held on April 6, 2026 with on-call architect IDS Group. 3.Advance the Environmental Assessment – Request for Proposal (RFP) Issued Feb. 19, 2026 Return to council summer 2026 (program, costs, delivery method) Page 1264 of 1339 Background RFP development with OR support (Jan – Feb) Numerous prior environmental studies and tests have been completed at the Yard as part of prior projects. Corrective Action Plan from Los Angeles County Fire Department Site Mitigation Unit (2020). Many of the studies and regulatory approvals have expired, need to be updated to current requirements. Environmental will help inform project scope and cost (i.e., abatement and remediation). Page 1265 of 1339 Discussion RFP advertised February 19, 2026. 6 Proposals received March 16, 2026. In-person interviews with top two ranked firms. Final Ranking: 1.Aspen Environmental Group 2.Roux Associates, Inc. 3.Place Works 4.UltraSystems Environmental, Inc. 5.Eyestone Environmental 6.Chambers Group, Inc.Page 1266 of 1339 Discussion CEQA Document and technical studies Hazardous materials studies Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) updated since prior 2018 HHRA Corrective Action Plan (CAP) updated 2019 CAP Health and Safety Plan (HASP) Shallow soil sample locations at a 50 ft x 50 ft grid to test for metals, pH, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), and semi-volatile organic compounds (including PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) Groundwater monitoring (3+ perimeter monitoring wells and 4+ (quarterly/semi-annual) groundwater sampling events) Soil Management Plan (SMP) Soil vapor surveying beneath the proposed future buildings and in the vicinity of the landfill area Geotechnical investigations and recommendations for the proposed building Hydrology analysis water quality management plan Scope of Services: Page 1267 of 1339 Discussion Page 1268 of 1339 Discussion Contract: Pre-construction services only at this time. At least 6+ months for environmental testing and analysis – schedule pending regulatory requirements, coordination with architectural, and future Council direction. Time and materials not to exceed $498,800 $75,000 contract contingency cover new studies/test, regulatory requirements. Page 1269 of 1339 Recommended Action 1.Award a contract for City Yard CEQA and environmental services to Roux Associates, Inc., not-to-exceed $498,800; 2.Authorize the City Manager to establish a project contingency amount of $75,000 and to approve amendments up to the amount of the approved project contingency; and 3.Authorize City Manager to execute the agreement, approve minor modifications, if necessary, with City Clerk attesting, subject to approval by City Attorney. Page 1270 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 4 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-PW-032 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE ENGINEER’S REPORT AND SETTING JUNE 23, 2026 FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESMENTS WITHIN THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT DURING FY 2026–2027 CEQA: Determine that adopting resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15378, 15061(b)(3), 15301(h), and 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines. (Public Works Director Joe Sanclemente) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) to approve the Engineer’s Report in connection with Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District during Fiscal Year (FY) 2026–2027 made pursuant to the requirements of Resolution No. 26 -7541; and 2. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 2) declaring the City’s invitation to order certain improvements and to levy and collect assessments within the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 2026 –2027 for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027, and appointing June 23, 2026, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers as the time and place for a public hearing in relation thereto; and 3. Determine that adopting the resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Executive Summary: The Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District (“District”) collects funds for the maintenance and operation of the citywide street lighting program and landscaping within street medians and parkways. The District must be renewed annually throu gh a three-step process. Staff recommends taking the above recommended actions thereby completing the second step of this process. Page 1271 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 4 Background: The District was created in Fiscal Year (FY) 1989–1990, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code Sections 22500–22679). The District assessment funds the maintenance and operation of streetlights, traffic signals, and landscaping located within parkways and medians citywide. The assessment rate has remained unchanged since the passage of Proposition 218 in 1996 and is set at $41.45 per dwelling unit. The City Council must approve the annual enrollment of assessments within the District through a three-step process. First, City Council directs the Director of Public Works to prepare an Engineer’s Report, which includes the list of parcels within the District, the method of apportioning the assessment across these parcels, and the estimat ed cost of maintaining and operating the District. Second, staff presents the Engineer’s Report to City Council for approval and requests to set a date for a public hearing declaring the City Council’s intention to order certain improvements and to levy an d collect assessments within the district for the new fiscal year. The third and final step is to hold a public hearing to gather public input on the proposed assessment and to determine whether there is a majority protest to the annual levy of assessments for FY 2026–2027. Past Council Actions Meeting Date Description March 10, 2026 City Council adopted Resolution 26-7541 (Attachment 3) authorizing the preparation of a report for the annual levy of assessments within the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District during Fiscal Year 2026–2027. Analysis: The City complies with Proposition 218 and can continue to levy assessments without requiring a ballot, provided the assessments are not increased. The assessment rate per dwelling unit has not increased since the passage of Proposition 218 in 1996 and will continue at the rate of $41.45 per dwelling unit in FY 2026–2027. The Council is now considering the second of three steps in the annual enrollment assessment process. By adopting the second resolution of this process (Attachment 1), City Council approves the Engineer’s Report (Attachment 4), prepared by an expert Assessment Engineer acting as the duly appointed Engineer of Work. The report contains maps, methodology, costs, and estimated assessments for the District and is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Adoption of the proposed resolution confirms that the report was prepared prior to the public hearing. By adopting the third resolution of this process (Attachment 2), City Council sets June 23, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers as the time and place for a public hearing in order to accept input on the report. The City Clerk would publish a Notice of Page 1272 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 4 Public Hearing in the paper, a minimum of 10 days in advance of the hearing. The draft public notice is included as Attachment 5. Environmental Analysis: The proceeding, which includes initiation of proceedings for the levying of annual assessments for landscape maintenance purposes, is not a “project” as defined by Section 15378, Project, of the CEQA guidelines. In addition, in accordance with Section 15061, Review for Exemption, this activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to project which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment and it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment and, hence, is not subject to CEQA. Further, even if this proceeding was deemed a project, it would be Categorically Exempt from CEQA per Section 15301, Existing Facilities, subsection (h) due to its funding the “maintenance of existing landscaping, native growth, and water supply reservoirs.” Lastly, none of the exceptions to Categorical Exemptions listed in Section 15300.2, Exceptions, are applicable to this proceeding. Options for Council Considerations: Option 1: Approve Engineer’s Report and Set Public Hearing Date (Recommended)  Will allow for the City the ability to adopt a future resolution to levy assessments in connection with the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 2026-2027. Doing so will allow the City to collect $456,000 from the assessment. Option 2: Do not approve staff’s recommendations  The City would not have the ability to adopt a future resolution to levy assessments in connection with the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 2026-2027.  Doing so will not allow the City to collect $456,000 from the ass essment and City would need to either cut services or supplement the District with additional General Fund resources. Fiscal Impact: The total cost of the operation and maintenance of the Landscaping and Street Lighting District 2026–2027 is estimated to be $881,630. The anticipated assessment to be collected for Fiscal Year 2026–2027 is $456,000. The $425,630 difference is offset by the General Fund to cover the deficit. To effectuate any proposed rate increase, to address the annual operating deficit, it must be placed on the ballot in compliance with Proposition 218. Page 1273 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 4 of 4 Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution Approving the Engineer’s Report 2. Draft Resolution Declaring the City’s Intention to Order Certain Improvements and to Levy and Collect Assessments 3. Resolution 26-7541 Ordering the Director of Public Works to Prepare a Report 4. Engineer’s Report 5. Draft Notice of Public Hearing Respectfully Submitted by: Brandon Araujo, Senior Engineer Concur: Saad Malim, City Engineer Concur: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Charlotte Newkirk, Senior Finance Analyst Concur: Henry Chao, Finance Manager Concur: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Legal Review: Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 1274 of 1339 Page 1 of 3 RES NO. 26-XXXX CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESOLUTION NO. 26-XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2026-2027 WHEREAS, the City Council (“Council”) adopted Resolution No. RES-26-7541 dated March 10, 2026 directing the Director of Public Works to prepare an Engineer’s Report in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Section 22500 et seq. of Part 2 to Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code) (“Act”) for the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District (“District”) for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2026 and ending June 30, 2027; and WHEREAS, the District provides for the installation, maintenance, servicing, and operation of public landscaping, street lighting, traffic signals, and appurtenant improvements within the boundaries of the District (“Improvements and Services”); and WHEREAS, under the direction of the Director of Public Works, NV5 (through Jeffrey M. Cooper, PE, as the expert Assessment Engineer acting as the duly appointed Engineer of Work) prepared and filed in the office of the City Clerk a written report (“Engineer’s Report”) in accordance with the Act (Article 4 of Chapter 1); and WHEREAS, the Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report and has preliminarily determined that the Engineer’s Report is sufficient and that the assessments described therein are apportioned in accordance with the special benefits received by the properties within the District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. Approval. The Engineer’s Report is hereby approved as filed. . SECTION 3. California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The Council finds the following pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines: Page 1275 of 1339 Page 2 of 3 RES NO. 26-XXXX a. Section 15378. Adoption of this Resolution is not a “project” within the meaning of Section 15378 because it constitutes an administrative and fiscal action approving an Engineer’s Report and initiating annual assessment proceedings, and initiating annual assessment proceedings does not authorize or approve any specific physical change to the environment. b. Section 15301 (Class 1 - Existing Facilities). The action is exempt from CEQA because it involves the continued maintenance, operation, a nd servicing of existing public landscaping, lighting, traffic signals, and related improvements with no expansion of existing use. c. Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption). The action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that adoption of this Resolution may have a significant effect on the environment. d. Section 15300.2. None of the exceptions set forth in Section 15300.2 apply. SECTION 4. Severability. If any section or provision of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Resolution shall remain valid. The Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation. SECTION 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City; and make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the Council in the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 26th day of May 2026. Page 1276 of 1339 Page 3 of 3 RES NO. 26-XXXX Mayor Mike Detoy PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ ________________________________ Martha Alvarez Jason Baltimore City Clerk Interim City Attorney Page 1277 of 1339 Page 1 of 4 RES-26-XXXX CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESOLUTION NO. RES-26-XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2026-2027 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2026 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2027; AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN RELATION THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council (“Council”) of the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) adopted Resolution No. RES-26-7541 dated March 10, 2026, directing the Director of Public Works to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report for the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District (“District”) pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Sections 22500-22679 to Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code) (“Act”); and WHEREAS, the District provides for the installation, maintenance, servicing, and operation of public landscaping, street lighting, traffic signals, and appurtenant improvements within the boundaries of the District (“Improvements and Services”); and WHEREAS, the Engineer of Work (Jeffrey M. Cooper, PE, of NV5) has prepared and filed with the City Clerk the Engineer’s Report (entitled “Engineer’s Report, City of Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 2026-2027”) in accordance with the Act (Article 4 of Chapter 1); and WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed and approved the Engineer’s Report; and now desires to declare its intention to order the Improvements and Services, and levy and collect assessments within the District for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Page 1278 of 1339 Page 2 of 4 RES-26-XXXX SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. Intention to Order Improvements and Levy Assessments. The Council hereby declares its intention to order the continued maintenance, operation, servicing, and improvements within the District; and to levy and collect assessments within the District for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2026, and ending June 30, 2027. SECTION 3. Description of Improvements and Services. The Improvements and Services consist generally of the continued maintenance, operation, and servicing of public landscaping, street lighting, traffic signals, irrigation systems, street trees, medians, parkways, and appurtenant facilities located within public street and sidewalk rights-of- way throughout the District (as more particularly described in the Engineer’s Report). SECTION 4. District. The District is designated as the “Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 2026-2027”. The boundaries of the District are coterminous with the boundaries of the City as shown in the Engineer’s Report and accompanying assessment diagram on file in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 5. Assessment Rate. The proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 are not proposed to increase from the assessments levied during F iscal Year 2025-2026, and shall remain at forty-one dollars and forty-five cents ($41.45) per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (“EDU”) as set forth in the Engineer’s Report. SECTION 6. Engineer’s Report. Reference is hereby made to the Engineer’s Report on file with the City Clerk for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. SECTION 7. Applicable Law. The Improvements and Services shall be provided pursuant to the Act and in accordance with the plans, specifications, and descriptions contained in the Engineer’s Report on file with the City Clerk. SECTION 8. Collection of Assessments. The assessment shall be levied and collected at the same time and in the same manner and with the same interest and penalties as general taxes of the City, which are collected for the City by the Los Angeles County Tax Collector. SECTION 9. Exempt Property. Public property owned by any public agency and used for public purposes, together with railroad and utility rights-of-way, shall be exempt from assessment as provided in the Engineer’s Report and applicable law. Page 1279 of 1339 Page 3 of 4 RES-26-XXXX SECTION 10. General Fund Contribution. The Council acknowledges that the City intends to contribute funds from the General Fund in the approximate amount of four hundred twenty-five thousand, six hundred thirty-four dollars ($425,634) to offset the operational costs of the District for Fiscal Year 2026-2027, as described in the Engineer’s Report. SECTION 11. Public Hearing. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Council shall conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, June 23, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. (or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard) in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California, to consider the levy and collection of assessments within the District and to hear and consider all protests and comments regarding the proposed assessments. SECTION 12. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized, designated, and directed to give notice of the public hearing in the time, form, and manner required by law. SECTION 13. Newspaper Publication. The Easy Reader is hereby designated as the newspaper of general circulation in which the notice of public hearing shall be published pursuant to applicable law. SECTION 14. California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The City Council finds the following pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines: a. Section 15378. Adoption of this Resolution is not a “project” within the meaning of Section 15378 because it constitutes an administrative and fiscal action initiating annual assessment proceedings, and initiating annual assessment proceedings does not authorize or approve any specific physical change to the environment. b. Section 15301 (Class 1 – Existing Facilities). The action is exempt from CEQA because it involves the continued maintenance, operation, and servicing of existing public landscaping, lighting, traffic signals, and related improvements with no expansion of existing use. c. Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption). The action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that adoption of this Resolution may have a significant effect on the environment. d. Section 15300.2. None of the exceptions set forth in Section 15300.2 apply. SECTION 15. Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Council intends that such invalidity will not Page 1280 of 1339 Page 4 of 4 RES-26-XXXX affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications; and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable. SECTION 16. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City; and make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the Council in the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. SECTION 17. Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 26th day of May 2026. Mayor Mike Detoy PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ ________________________________ Martha Alvarez Jason Baltimore City Clerk Interim City Attorney Page 1281 of 1339 Page 1 of 3 RES-26-7541 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESOLUTION NO. RES-26-7541 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE A REPORT FOR THE MAINTENANCE, OPERATION, AND SERVICING OF STREET AND SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING, AND APPURTENANT WORK FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2026, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2027, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4 TO CHAPTER 1 OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, the City Council (“Council”) of the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) adopted Resolution No. RES-26-7541 dated March 10, 2026 establishing the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District (“District”) pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Sections 22500-22679 to Part 2 to Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code) (“Act”); WHEREAS, the District provides for the installation, maintenance, servicing, and operation of public landscaping, street lighting, traffic signals, and appurtenant improvements within the boundaries of the District (“Improvements and Services”); and WHEREAS, the Council must approve the annual enrollment of assessments within the District to pay the costs and expenses of the Improvements and Services. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. Preparation of Engineer’s Report. The Council hereby directs the Director of Public Works to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report for the Improvements and Services within the District for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2026, and ending June 30, 2027, in accordance with Article 4 to Chapter 1 of the Act. Docusign Envelope ID: FD2E54B5-49E9-4B85-8B59-90BB62A49FBB Page 1282 of 1339 Page 1 of 3 RES-26-7541 SECTION 3. California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The City Council finds the following pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines: a. Section 15378. Adoption of this Resolution is not a “project” within the meaning of Section 15378 because it constitutes an administrative and fiscal action directing preparation of an Engineer’s Report, and initiating annual assessment proceedings does not authorize or approve any specific physical change to the environment. b. Section 15301 (Class 1 – Existing Facilities). The action is exempt from CEQA even if this action were deemed a “project” pursuant to Section 15301 because it involves the continued maintenance, operation, and servicing of existing public landscaping, lighting, traffic signals, and related improvements with no expansion of existing use. c. Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption). The action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that adoption of this Resolution may have a significant effect on the environment. d. Section 15300.2. None of the exceptions set forth in Section 15300.2 apply. SECTION 4. Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications; and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable. SECTION 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City; and make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the Council in the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption. Docusign Envelope ID: FD2E54B5-49E9-4B85-8B59-90BB62A49FBB Page 1283 of 1339 Page 1 of 3 RES-26-7541 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 10th day of March 2026. Mayor Michael Detoy PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ ________________________________ Ann Yang Jason Baltimore Interim City Clerk Interim City Attorney Docusign Envelope ID: FD2E54B5-49E9-4B85-8B59-90BB62A49FBB Page 1284 of 1339 State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) ss City of Hermosa Beach ) March 12, 2026 Certification of Council Action RESOLUTION NO. RES-26-7541 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE A REPORT FOR THE MAINTENANCE, OPERATION, AND SERVICING OF STREET AND SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING, AND APPURTENANT WORK FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2026, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2027, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4 TO CHAPTER 1 OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 I, Ann Yang , Interim City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. RES-26-7541 was duly approved and adopted by the City Council of said City at its regular meeting thereof held on the 10th day of March 2026 and passed by the following vote: AYES: MAYOR DETOY, MAYOR PRO TEMPORE KEEGAN, COUNCILMEMBERS JACKSON, FRANCOIS, AND SAEMANN NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NONE ________________________________ Ann Yang Interim City Clerk Docusign Envelope ID: FD2E54B5-49E9-4B85-8B59-90BB62A49FBB Page 1285 of 1339 ENGINEER’S REPORT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2026-2027 Page 1286 of 1339 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2026-2027 Prepared By: NV5 Jeffrey M. Cooper, PE COO May 14, 2026 Page 1287 of 1339 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2026-2027 TABLE OF CONTENTS Certificate .................................................................................................. 1 Report........................................................................................................ 2 Part A - Plans and Specifications ................................................... 4 Part B - Estimate of Cost ................................................................ 5 Part C - Assessment Roll ............................................................... 6 Part D - Method of Apportionment of Assessment .......................... 7 Part E - Property Owner List........................................................... 9 Part F - Assessment District Boundary ........................................... 10 Page 1288 of 1339 1 ENGINEER’S REPORT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2026-2027 The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. DATED: May 14, 2026 BY: Jeffrey M. Cooper, PE COO, NV5 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the day of , 2026. City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles County, California By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, on the day of , 2026. City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles County, California By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Assessment Roll and Diagram were filed with the County Auditor of the County of Los Angeles, on the day of , 2026. City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles County, California By Page 1289 of 1339 2 FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679, OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation adopted by the Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for: HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2026-2027 Hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District" or "District", Jeffrey M. Cooper, PE, Assessment Engineer, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of six (6) parts as follows: PART A Plans and specifications for the improvements showing and describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements. PART B An estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements for FY 2026-2027, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith. PART C An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District. PART D The method of apportionment of assessments, indicating the proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels. Page 1290 of 1339 3 PART E A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within the Assessment District, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles. PART F The Diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District. Page 1291 of 1339 4 PART A PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The facilities, which have been constructed within the City of Hermosa Beach, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be operated, serviced and maintained as generally described as follows: DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2026-2027 The proposed improvements for FY 2026-2027 may be generally described as the continued maintenance and operation of streets and sidewalks within the District, including the operation, servicing and maintenance of landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities that are located in and along such streets and sidewalks, including but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services described as follows: Street Landscaping and Appurtenant Facilities Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees and appurtenant facilities, including irrigation systems, hardscapes and fixtures in public street and sidewalk rights-of-way, including parkways and medians, within the boundaries of the Assessment District. Street Lighting and Appurtenant Facilities Poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and appurtenant facilities as required to provide street lighting and traffic signals in public street and sidewalk rights-of-way, including parkways and medians, within the boundaries of the Assessment District. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the landscaping, lighting facilities and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping, lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; and the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping and the maintenance of any of the lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for the lighting facilities, or for the lighting or operation of the landscaping or appurtenant facilities. The plans and specifications for the improvements, showing and describing the general nature, location, and the extent of the improvements, are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are incorporated herein by reference. Page 1292 of 1339 5 PART B ESTIMATE OF COSTS LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT Proposed Budget - Fiscal Year 2026-2027 The estimated cost of the operation, servicing and maintenance of the street and sidewalk improvements for fiscal year 2026-2027, as described in Part A, are summarized herein and described below. Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance and Servicing • Median & Pkwy Landscaping Maintenance and Servicing • Lighting Maintenance and Servicing • Tree Trimming $772,670 Administration Costs $11,054 Insurance $51,376 L.A. County Tax Collection Costs $2,000 Equipment Replacement $44,530 Proposed Capital Improvements $0 Expenditures Subtotal: $881,630 Appropriation from Fund balance ($3,278) Amount transferred from General Fund $425,634 Miscellaneous Revenues $3,274 Total Assessment: $456,000 Fund Balance 6/30/27 $0 Total amount of $425,634 will be transferred from the General Fund to maintain the District for FY 2026-2027. The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. Note: Total cost of the operation, servicing and maintenance of the Landscaping and Street Lighting District 2026-2027 is estimated to be $881,630. Page 1293 of 1339 6 PART C ASSESSMENT ROLL The total proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 and the amount of the total proposed assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel within the District, as shown on the latest assessment roll at the Los Angeles County Assessor's Office, are contained in the Assessment Roll on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, which is incorporated herein by reference. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the Los Angeles County assessment roll and this roll is, by reference, made part of this Report. Page 1294 of 1339 7 PART D METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT GENERAL Part 2, of Division 15, of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include operation, maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and landscaping. The 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. Section 22573 provides that: “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements" (Sec. 22574) Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "benefit assessment" rather than a "special tax." Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of all publicly owned property in use in the performance of a public function. Railroad and utility rights-of-way are also exempt from assessment. BENEFIT ANALYSIS • Street Lighting and Traffic Signals - The proper functioning of street lighting and traffic signals is imperative for the welfare and safety of the public and property throughout the City. Proper operation, maintenance and servicing of the street lighting system benefits properties within the District by providing proper illumination for ingress and egress and safe traveling at night. Properties within the District also benefit from the proper functioning of the District's traffic signal system. Proper operation of the streetlight and traffic signal systems is imperative to public convenience, orderly traffic flow, enhanced congestion management and safety. Improved security, fuel conservation, protection of property from crime and vandalism, and reduction of traffic accidents, are special and direct benefits to all properties within the City; lighting benefits are directly related to public safety and property protection and therefore increase property values. • Median and Parkway Landscaping and Tree Trimming - Trees, landscaping, hardscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification, shade and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value. The City maintains trees and miscellaneous shrubbery and landscaping throughout the City. The trees, shrubbery and landscaping are located within the public street and sidewalk rights-of- way, including parkways and medians. These trees, shrubbery and landscaping provide an Page 1295 of 1339 8 aesthetically pleasing environment, shade, beautification, and, according to some authorities, air purification and sound attenuation. These positive attributes increase the value of all properties throughout the City. Therefore, all property within the District receive an overall specific and direct benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the street median and parkway landscaping and street tree trimming programs. Special benefits which are received by all parcels in the City are considered to be City-wide Benefits, and the associated costs of these special benefits are spread equally, based on Equivalent Dwelling Units, to all parcels within the District. All properties in the District benefit from the operation, maintenance and servicing of the street lighting, traffic signals, street median and parkway landscaping and street tree trimming. The degree of benefit to each parcel of land varies depending on its land use and the size of the parcel. If assessments were spread on an individual parcel basis, not considering land use or parcel size, it would not be an equitable method of spread because a single family parcel would pay the same assessment as a 50-unit apartment parcel or a large commercial parcel. Therefore, the method for spreading the improvement costs, which must be based on special and direct benefit, is on an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) basis. The EDU method uses the residential dwelling unit as the basic unit and compares other uses to it, as follows: • Residential parcels are assessed based on the number of dwelling units on each parcel, where each residential dwelling unit equals one EDU • Non-residential parcels have been converted into EDU'S, based on engineering judgment taking into consideration the size of the parcel and the amount of frontage along the street. Every parcel is assessed a minimum of one (1) EDU. There are a total of 11,068 EDUs within the Assessment District. ASSESSMENT RATE CALCULATION Based on a budget of $458,768.60 as shown in Part B of this report, the preliminary assessment rate for FY 2026-2027 is calculated as follows: $458,768.60 ÷ 11,068 EDUs = $41.45 per EDU The assessment for FY 2025-2026 was $41.45 per EDU. Page 1296 of 1339 9 PART E PROPERTY OWNER LIST A list of names and addresses of the owners of all parcels within this District is shown on the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles, which by reference is hereby made a part of this report. This list is keyed to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers as shown on the Assessment Roll on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach. Page 1297 of 1339 10 PART F ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY The boundaries of the District are coterminous with the boundaries of the City of Hermosa Beach. A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the District, the boundaries of any zones within the District, and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, and is incorporated herein by reference. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles for fiscal year 2026-2027. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. Page 1298 of 1339 11 2026-2027 Page 1299 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) shall hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 23, 2026, at 6:30 PM to consider the levy and collection of assessments for the continued maintenance, operation, and servicing of landscaping, street lighting, traffic signals, irrigation systems, street trees, medians, parkways, and appurtenant facilities within the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 2026-2027 (“District”) for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2026, and ending June 30, 2027 (“FY 2026-2027”). On May 26, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. RES-26-XXXX declaring its intention to order certain improvements and to levy and collect assessments within the District and setting the public hearing for June 23, 2026. SAID PUBLIC MEETING is open to the public and being held in-person in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (“City Hall”). Public comment is only guaranteed to be taken in person at City Hall during the meeting or prior to the meeting by submitting an eComment, email, or letter for an item on the agenda. As a courtesy only, the public may view and participate on action items listed on the agenda via the following: ZOOM - https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82539742028?pwd=OUNTRDNvd2l6TzBpTDljc2x6bGFwdz09 Meeting ID: 825 3974 2028 Password: 207860 PHONE - Toll Free: (833) 548-0276; Meeting ID: : 825 3974 2028, then #; Passcode: 207860 PLEASE BE ADVISED that while the City will endeavor to ensure these remote participation methods are available, the City does not guarantee that they will be technically feasible or work all the time. Further, the City reserves the right to terminate these remote participation methods (subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act restrictions) at any time and for whatever reason. Please attend in person or by submitting an eComment prior to the meeting to ensure your public participation. To guarantee live time viewing and/or public participation, members of the public shall attend in Council Chambers. CABLE TV - Spectrum Channel 8 and Frontier Channel 31 in Hermosa Beach YOUTUBE - https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofHermosaBeach90254 LIVE STREAM - www.hermosabeach.gov and visit the Agendas/Minutes/Videos page To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices are available for check out at the meeting. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, you must call or email the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0204 or at cityclerk@hermosabeach.gov at least 48 hours before the meeting. IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the above-listed departments at, or prior to, the public meeting. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Public Works Department at (310) 318-0262 or baraujo@hermosabeach.gov. Department hours are 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM, Monday-Thursday. A copy of the agenda and staff report(s) shall be available for public review at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting on the City’s website at www.hermosabeach.gov. Page 1300 of 1339 LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 MAY 26, 2026 Page 1301 of 1339 Background The Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District: Funds operations and maintenance of street lighting and landscaping within medians and parkways Created in FY 1989-1990 Fee has not changed since passage of Proposition 218 in 1996 and set at $41.45 per dwelling unit Page 1302 of 1339 Background Annual enrollment of assessments within the District requires a 3-step process: 1.Council orders preparation of Engineer’s Report (March 10) 2.Council approves Report and sets Public Hearing date (May 26 - tonight) 3.Public Hearing (June 23) Page 1303 of 1339 Analysis Absent majority protest on June 23, City may levy assessment beginning July 1, 2026 and ending June 30, 2027. For FY 26-27, anticipated assessment is $456,000 vs. estimated costs of $881,630. Shortfall of $425,630 from previous fiscal year covered primarily through General Fund. Any proposed rate increase to address operating deficit would need to be placed on the ballot in compliance with Proposition 218. Page 1304 of 1339 Recommended Action 1.Adopt a resolution to approve the Engineer’s Report in connection with Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District during FY 2026–27; 2.Adopt a resolution declaring the City’s invitation to order certain improvements and to levy and collect assessments within the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District for FY 2026-27, and appointing June 23, 2026, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers as the time and place for a public hearing in relation thereto; and3.Determine that adopting the resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Page 1305 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-CMO-035 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council LETTER OF OPPOSITION FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 1383: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT BENEFITS (Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo) Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council discuss providing a letter of opposition for Assembly Bill 1383. Executive Summary: The City of Hermosa Beach regularly expresses its support or opposition regarding legislative matters that would have an impact on the City. On May 19, the League of California Cities sent an urgent email stating that Assembly Bill 1383 is set to roll back some of the Public Employee’ Pension Reform Act pension reforms for certain public safety personnel and is requesting letters of opposition from cities. Staff presents the following item for consideration to provide a letter of opposition for Assembly Bil l 1383. Background: Assembly Bill 1383 (AB 1383) was introduced February 21, 2025, by Assemblymember Tina McKinnor, and proposes to alter the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) to grant enhanced retirement security for public safety workers (e.g. firefighters and peace officers) in order to address recruitment and retention efforts. California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) is the nation’s largest public pension system, administering retirement and health benefits for eligible public employees, retirees, and their beneficiaries across California. The system operates as a defined-benefit pension program funded through a combination of employee contributions, employer contributions, and investment returns. The California Public Employees Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) establishes a variety of requirements and restrictions on public employers offering defined benefit pension plans. In this regard, PEPRA restricts the amount of compensation that may be applied for purposes of calculating a defined pension benefit for a new member, as defined, by restricting it to specified percentages of the contribution and benefit base. Page 1306 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 2 of 3 This bill, for service performed on and after January 1, 2027, would prohibit the pensionable compensation for calendar year 2027 used to calculate the defined benefit paid to a new member of a retirement system subject to PEPRA who retires from the system from exceeding specified percentages of the contribution and benefit base. The bill would make related, conforming changes to these provisions on pensionable compensation. PEPRA requires each retirement system that offers a defined benefit plan for safety members of the system to use one of 3 formulas for safety members, 2% at age 57, 2.5% at age 57, or 2.7% at age 57. Hermosa Beach currently provides its PEPRA peace officers with 2.7% at 57. This bill would establish new retirement formulas, for employees first hired on or after January 1, 2027, as 2.5% at age 55, 2.7% at age 55, or 3% at age 55, subject to certain exceptions. For new members hired on or after January 1, 2013, who are safety members, the bill would require employers to adjust the formulas for service performed on or after January 1, 2027, to offer the formula that has the same fraction at age 55 as the fraction at age 57 in the formula the employer provided offered pursuant to existing law. The bill would authorize a public employer and a recognized em ployee organization to negotiate a prospective increase to the retirement benefit formulas for safety members and new safety members, consistent with the formulas permitted under PEPRA, including the new formulas described above. This bill would authorize an employer and its employees to agree in a memorandum of understanding to be subject to a higher safety plan or a lower safety plan, subject to certain requirements, including that the memorandum of understanding is collectively bargained in accordance with applicable laws. Analysis: AB 1383 would make several changes to PEPRA, resulting in substantial increases for cities. What the Bill Does:  Increases the pensionable compensation cap for PEPRA public employees.  Reduces the retirement age for public safety employees from 57 to 55, applied prospectively.  Creates a new fourth safety tier, establishing a 3% at 55 formula that is prospective and subject to collective bargaining.  Allows local agencies to adjust their local pension formulas prospectively, providing them with the authority to modify benefit structures going forward. Why AB 1383 is Important to Cal Cities Members: Page 1307 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 3 of 3  PEPRA reforms have generated an estimated $5.8 billion in savings to date and $26.5 billion projected over 10 years.  Changing these reforms would increase employer and employee contribution rates, create new administrative and long-term solvency challenges for cities, and would undermine a decade of progress in stabilizing pension systems and managing long-term liabilities.  Cities are already facing rising pension obligations, stagnant revenues, and new federal and state mandates that strain local budgets.  Higher pension costs would threaten core city services, staffing levels, and overall fiscal stability.  Increased mandated costs would limit cities’ ability to invest in workforce compensation, community programs, and essential public services. AB 1383 is currently in the Senate Labor Employee Relations & Retirement Committee. Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with this recommendation. Attachment: AB 1383 - Letter of Opposition Respectfully Submitted by: Sara Russo, Senior Management Analyst Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager Page 1308 of 1339 City Council 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 | hermosabeach.gov | HermosaBchCity HermosaBeachCity May 26, 2026 The Honorable Tina McKinnor Chair, Assembly Committee on Public Employment and Retirement 1020 N Street, Room 153 Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: AB 1383 (McKinnor) Public employees’ retirement benefits. OPPOSE (As Amended May 13, 2026) Assembly Member McKinnor: The City of Hermosa Beach must respectfully oppose AB 1383, which would make several significant changes to public employees’ retirement benefits and lead to increased pension liability for public agencies. The Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) was designed to address a wide range of issues involving public employee pensions and was a major step in helping local agencies better manage future pension costs and prevent the California Public Employees Retirement System from sliding into insolvency. AB 1383 would upend many of the reforms put in place in 2013 by PEPRA. While we recognize and appreciate the intent of the bill to support recruitment and retention of essential public safety professionals, the bill would increase mandated costs without funding. The potential cost of this bill comes at a time of uncertainty. The fiscal volatility in the market compounded with the increased benefit costs from this bill could lead to serious cost increases for local government. While our city supports competitive recruitment and retention for all public employees, AB 1383 represents an unfunded mandate that fails to balance sustainable retirement benefits with taxpayer fairness and long-term financial stability. For these reasons, the City of Hermosa Beach respectfully opposes AB 1383. Sincerely, Michael Keegan Mayor Pro Tem cc: Senator Ben Allen, Senate District 24 Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi, Assembly District 66 Honorable Members, Senate Labor, Public Employment and Retirement Committee Jeffrey Kiernan, Regional Public Affairs Manager (via email: jkiernan@calcities.org) Page 1309 of 1339 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 | hermosabeach.gov | HermosaBchCity HermosaBeachCity Page 2 League of California Cities, (via email: cityletters@calcities.org) Page 1310 of 1339 ASSEMBLY BILL 1383 May 26, 2026 Page 1311 of 1339 Background •Introduced February 21, 2025 •Proposes to alter the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) to grant enhanced retirement security for public safety workers (e.g. firefighters and peace officers) in order to address recruitment and retention efforts. Page 1312 of 1339 ANALYSIS •Increases the pensionable compensation cap for PEPRA public employees. •Reduces the retirement age for public safety employees from 57 to 55. •Creates a new 4th safety tier and establishes a 3% at 55 formula. •Allows local agencies to adjust their local pension formulas providing them with the authority to modify benefit structures going forward. Page 1313 of 1339 ANALYSIS CONTINUED •PEPRA reforms have generated an estimated $5.8 billion in savings and $26.5 billion projected over 10 years. •Changing would increase employer and employee contribution rates, create new long-term solvency challenges, and undermine a decade of progress in stabilizing pension systems and managing long-term liabilities. •Cities are already facing rising pension obligations, stagnant revenues, and new federal and state mandates that strain local budgets. •Higher pension costs would threaten core city services, staffing levels, and overall fiscal stability. •Increased mandated costs would limit cities’ ability to invest in workforce compensation, community programs, and essential public services. Page 1314 of 1339 RECOMMENDATION To discuss and provide staff direction on AB 1383. Page 1315 of 1339 City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 26, 2026 Staff Report No. 26-CMO-034 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information. The tentative future agenda provides a preliminary preview of topics planned for discussion at upcoming City Council meetings over a specified period, typically the next three months. The items listed in this document are "tentatively" scheduled, meaning they are subject to change and should not be considered final until the official agenda for each meeting is posted. This document is a work in progress and offers a glimpse into the City's priorities and planned discussions, allowing stakeholders to anticipate and prepare for potential topics of interest. Key Features of a Tentative Future Agenda Document: 1. Tentative Schedule: Each agenda item is assigned a tentative date, indicating when it is expected to be discussed. These dates are provisional and may be adjusted based on various factors. 2. Work in Progress: The document is continuously updated as new items emerge, priorities shift, or additional information becomes available. This flexibility ensures City Council can address the most pressing issues in a timely manner. 3. Transparency and Communication: By publishing a tentative future agenda, the City aims to maintain transparency with residents, businesses, and other stakeholders. It helps the community stay informed about potential topics of discussion and provides an opportunity for public engagement and preparation. 4. Fluid Scheduling: The scheduling of agenda items is fluid until the official agenda for a specific City Council meeting is posted. Changes can occur due to various reasons, such as new developments, additional preparatory work required, or changes in workload or priority. Attachment: Tentative Future Agenda Items Page 1316 of 1339 CITY COUNCIL TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA Revised: May 19, 2026 at 11:00 A.M. THURSDAY, MAY 28, 2026 @ 6:00 PM STUDY SESSION: FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM JUNE 9, 2026 @ 4:00 PM BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICANT INTERIVEWS JUNE 9, 2026 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATECLOSED SESSION JUNE 9, 2026 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS PROCLAMATION DECLARING JUNE AS PRIDE MONTH IN HERMOSA BEACH CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Administrative Services Director Ongoing Approval of Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Senate Bill 1) Project List for the City of Hermosa Beach for Fiscal Year 2026-27 Public Works Director Annual Rotary Club of Hermosa Beach Farmer’s Market Agreement 2026 –2028 Parks and Recreation Director Staff Request Apr. 27, 2026 Approval of the Friends of the Library Agreement 2026-2028 Parks and Recreation Director Staff Request May 14, 2026 Consideration of Request to Establish Memorandum of Understanding with Bark for a Park Parks and Recreation Director Staff Request May 14, 2026 PUBLIC HEARINGS Fiscal Year 2026–27 Budget Hearing Administrative Services Director Annual Resolution Adopting Fees from a Fee Study Update (Continued from May 12, 2026) Administrative Services Director Council Direction May 12, 2026 Adoption of Kelly Pickleball Court Reservation and Membership Fee and modification of the Master Fee Schedule Parks and Recreation Director Council Direction May 12, 2026 Introduction of an Ordinance to amend Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Chapter 12.30 Special Events on Public Property and adoption of a resolution to establish new Special Event Permit Program fees. Parks and Recreation Director Staff Request May 14, 2026 MUNICIPAL MATTERS Two Appointments to Public Works Commission and One Appointment to Civil Service Board City Clerk Annual Consideration of Resolutions Calling and Giving Notice Pertaining to the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election to be Conducted by the Los Angeles County Registrar - Recorder/County Clerk City Clerk Election Years (No later than June) Award of contracts for on-call broker/dealer services Administrative Services Director/City Treasurer Staff Request Apr. 20, 2026 Award of Construction Contract for CIP 107 - Citywide Slurry Seal Project (~$380K) Public Works Director Staff Request Apr. 28, 2026 Award of Professional Service Agreements for On-Call Environmental Monitoring and Testing Services (Two contracts at $200K each) Public Works Director Staff Request Feb. 25, 2026 Page 1317 of 1339 2 Award of Construction Contract for CIP 504 - Playground Equipment Replacement Project (~$220K) Public Works Director Staff Request Apr. 30, 2026 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing CITY MANAGER REPORTS INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Los Angeles County Fire and Ambulance Monthly Report for January, February, and March 2026 Emergency Management Coordinator Ongoing Action minutes of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting of May 5, 2026 Parks and Recreation Director Ongoing Parking Citation and Revenue Report – May 2026 Senior Management Analyst Ongoing Page 1318 of 1339 3 JUNE 23, 2026 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION JUNE 23, 2026 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS RECOGNIZING KIM SWINDELL FOR HER RETIREMENT AND SERVICE TO THE CITY RECOGNIZING JULY AS NATIONAL PARKS AND RECREATION MONTH CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Administrative Services Director Ongoing Cash Balance Report for April 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing Revenue Report, Expenditure Report, and CIP Report by Project for April 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing Adopt a Resolution to Approve and Adopt the Annual Tax Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2026-27 Administrative Services Director Annual City Treasurer’s Report for May 2026 City Treasurer Ongoing Capital Improvement Program Status Report Public Works Director Ongoing Consideration of a Resolution Amending the Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk Biennial Second Reading - Zoning Code Update - Administrative Procedures Community Development Director Council Direction May 26, 2026 Adopt an Ordinance to Amend Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Chapter 12.30 Special Events on Public Property Parks and Recreation Director Council Direction June 9, 2026 PUBLIC HEARINGS Annual Staffing Vacancies Report – Assembly Bill 2561 (AB 2561) Human Resources Manager Annual Adoption of Fiscal Year 2026–27 Budget Administrative Services Director Annual Public Hearing to Review Delinquent Solid Waste Collection (Refuse) Charges for Consideration of Placing Said Charges on the Property Tax Rolls as a Special Assessment Affecting Only Those Properties with Refuse Bills Delinquent as of March 31, 2026 Environmental Programs Manager Annual Adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and levying assessments for the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026–2027. Public Works Director Annual Public Hearing on the Annual Levy of Sewer Charges on the Property Tax Roll Public Works Director Annual MUNICIPAL MATTERS HCD Annual Progress Report on Housing Community Development Director Staff Request Feb. 11, 2026 Surfers Walk of Fame Relocation Review Parks and Recreation Director Council Direction Mar. 24, 2026 Informational Item to Explore a Pilot Program for an Entertainment Zone for Special Events (supported by: Jackson and Saemann) Parks and Recreation Director Council Direction Apr. 14, 2026 Adopt a Policy Regarding Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service During City Council Meetings to Comply with SB 707 (Senate Bill 707) City Clerk Staff Request May 4, 2026 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing CITY MANAGER REPORTS INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Page 1319 of 1339 4 Los Angeles County Fire and Ambulance Monthly Report for April 2026 Emergency Management Coordinator Ongoing Police Crime Statistics for May 2026 Police Chief Ongoing Action minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of April 21 and May 5, 2026 Community Development Director Ongoing NO MEETING - JULY 14, 2026 (DARK FOR SUMMER VACATION SEASON) Page 1320 of 1339 5 JULY 28, 2026 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION JULY 28, 2026 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Administrative Services Director Ongoing Cash Balance Report for May 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing Revenue Report, Expenditure Report, and CIP Report by Project for May 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing City Treasurer’s Report for June 2026 City Treasurer Ongoing Capital Improvement Program Status Report Public Works Director Ongoing PUBLIC HEARINGS MUNICIPAL MATTERS Award of Contract to IKC Consulting for On-going TA Accela Community Development Director Staff Request May 13, 2026 Review of Hermosa Beach Lawn Bowling Club Operations and Consideration of an Agreement with the Lawn Bowling Club (supported by Jackson, Detoy, and Keegan) Parks and Recreation Director Council Direction June 24, 2025 Consideration of Park After School Program Fee Update Parks and Recreation Director Staff Request May 14, 2026 Consideration of Valley Park Summer Day Camp Fee Update Parks and Recreation Director Staff Request May 14, 2026 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing CITY MANAGER REPORTS INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Los Angeles County Fire and Ambulance Monthly Report for May 2026 Emergency Management Coordinator Ongoing Police Crime Statistics for June 2026 Police Chief Ongoing Action minutes of the Public Works Commission Meeting of May 20, 2026 Public Works Director Ongoing Action minutes of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting of June 2, 2026 Parks and Recreation Director Ongoing Action minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 16, 2026 Community Development Director Ongoing Page 1321 of 1339 6 NO MEETING – AUGUST 11, 2026 (DARK FOR SUMMER VACATION SEASON) AUGUST 25, 2026 @ 5:00 PM INITIAL DATE CLOSED SESSION AUGUST 25, 2026 @ 6:00 PM PRESENTATIONS CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes City Clerk Ongoing Check Registers Administrative Services Director Ongoing Cash Balance Report for June 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing Revenue Report, Expenditure Report, and CIP Report by Project for June 2026 Administrative Services Director Ongoing City Treasurer’s Report for July 2026 City Treasurer Ongoing Capital Improvement Program Status Report Public Works Director Ongoing PUBLIC HEARINGS MUNICIPAL MATTERS Award of Contract for On-call CEQA Consulting Services Community Development Director Staff Request May 13, 2026 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS – CITY COUNCIL Future Agenda Items City Manager Ongoing CITY MANAGER REPORTS INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Los Angeles County Fire and Ambulance Monthly Report for June 2026 Emergency Management Coordinator Ongoing Police Crime Statistics for July 2026 Police Chief Ongoing Action minutes of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting of July 7, 2026 Parks and Recreation Director Ongoing Action minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of July 21, 2026 Community Development Director Ongoing Page 1322 of 1339 7 PENDING NEW ITEMS STATUS / TENTATIVE MEETING DATE (Updated 12/29/25) Landscape and Street Lighting District Assessment Adjustment (mail-in election authorization) Initiated by: Council Direction Jul. 9, 2019 Public Works Director Pending staff availability. If council agrees to advance the adjustment, it will need to go to a citywide ballot in compliance with Proposition 218. Emergency Services Municipal Code Chapter 2.56 Update Emergency Management Coordinator Waiting for State to review proposed language changes Consideration of licensing agreement/fees for use of City logo Initiated by: Council Direction Jun. 9, 2020 City Attorney/City Clerk The City will develop a licensing agreement for commercial uses of the City logo as part of a comprehensive Administrative Memorandum (AM) on City Branding and Logo Use by City Staff. City staff will begin drafting the AM after finalizing the City’s style guide and filing its “Intent to Use” trademark application for the City logo with the USPTO. As part of developing a Licensing Agreement for the Commercial Use of the City Logo, staff will establish a process for reviewing and handling these requests. This process will likely include the negotiation of royalties and as well as the preparation of a staff report to obtain Council approval to enter into the agreement. Only after the City receives the issuance of a Notice of Allowance from the USPTO can it begin approving applications for commercial uses of the logo. Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission Volleyball Court Use Subcommittee was formed to review all aspects of the beach volleyball courts located in the residential area Initiated: 2021 Parks and Recreation Director To be completed in the first quarter of 2026. PLAN Hermosa 5-year check-in on milestones (Supported by Massey, Campbell, Armato, Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction October 26, 2021 Community Development Director/Environmen tal Program Manager The next update to City Council will be in 2026 Page 1323 of 1339 8 Consideration of rules that would govern operation of off-sale alcohol establishments in downtown and consideration of queuing for on-sale alcohol establishments. (supported by Massey, Saemann and Detoy) Initiated by: Council Direction June 13, 2023 Community Development/Polic e Chief/Deputy City Manager Ordinance to be established to address items. Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey and review of provisions in California Assembly Bill 43 that are anticipated to become effective on or about June 30, 2024. Initiated by: Unanimous Council Direction July 25, 2023 Public Works Director Pending staffing availability and completion of other previously requested future agenda items. Targeting Summer 2026. Request Public Works Commission to review fines and other consequences involved with illegal tree removal and return to Council as an action item for discussion and deliberation. (supported by Saemann, Francois, Detoy) Initiated by: Council Direction August 13, 2024 Public Works Director Pending staffing availability and completion of other previously requested future agenda items. Explore Best Practices for Undergrounding. (supported by: Detoy, Saemann, and Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction November 12, 2024 Public Works Director Pending staffing availability and completion of other previously requested future agenda items. Staff will also need to request funding in the future budget cycle to support bringing in appropriate consulting expertise on this item. Refer the public pool discussion to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission for review prior to City Council. (supported by Saemann, Detoy, and Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction June 24, 2025 Parks and Recreation Director Pending Commission Review Consideration of Adding Another Accessible Beach Mat, Modifications to Existing Layout, and Potential for Outside Funding for a Permanent Installation (supported by: Francois, Saemann and Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction August 26, 2025 Public Works Director Item will return to Council after review by the Public Works Commission Agendize discussion on Rosenberg’s Rules of Order and Robert’s Rules of Order at the next City Council Retreat (supported by: Detoy and Jackson) Initiated by: Council Direction September 9, 2025 City Manager The next City Council Retreat will be scheduled once a permanent City Manager is appointed Informational Item for Public Works Commission to study maximizing and expanding the street parking inventory through the analysis of the City's red curb standard to include studying golfcart parking spaces for reduced streets and studying the Driveway Parking Permit Program. (supported by: Jackson and Saemann) Initiated by: Council Direction September 9, 2025 Public Works Director Pending staffing availability and completion of other previously requested future agenda items. Informational Item to review the feasibility of collecting Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) for short-term vacation rentals that are out of compliance, and of collecting unpaid fines from illegal short-term vacation rentals. (supported by: Jackson and Saemann) Initiated by: Council Direction September 9, 2025 Administrative Services Director Staff will come back to Council in the next few months for an update. Informational Item to Consider Including Dispatch Services as Part of Bid for Fire Services (supported by: Keegan and Saemann) Initiated by: Council Direction April 28, 2026 City Manager Page 1324 of 1339 9 Consideration of rescinding current CDP application for Short Term Rentals and have Staff bring back potential regulations that would expand STR opportunities throughout City and compare those to successful programs in other cities, including all rules and penalties that those cities employ, for potential revenue to City (supported by: Keegan, Saemann, and Francois) Initiated by: Council Direction August 28, 2026 Community Development Director Informational Item for a comprehensive review of City speed limits, focusing on major thoroughfares including Hermosa Avenue, 27th Street, Valley Drive, Ardmore Avenue, and Prospect Avenue (supported by: Jackson and Detoy) Initiated by: Council Direction May 12, 2026 Public Works Director Dog Park - Comprehensive feasibility analysis of Valley Park East as the primary location and the Greenbelt as a secondary location, and to return with information on a potential ballot measure regarding the Greenbelt location Council Direction May 12, 2026 Parks and Recreation Director Draft Responses/Comments for Participation in the National Park Service Los Angeles Coastal Area Special Resource Study Council Direction May 12, 2026 Management Analyst Page 1325 of 1339 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2026 (Regular Meeting Times: Closed Sessions at 5:00 PM and Open Sessions at 6:00 PM) Page 1 of 2 (Revised 5-7-26) JANUARY 13, 2026 JANUARY 27, 2026 FEBRUARY 3, 2026 FEBRUARY 24, 2026 (ELECTION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE) MARCH 10, 2026 MARCH 24, 2026 APRIL 14, 2026 APRIL 28, 2026 FY 2026–2027 BUDGET STUDY SESSION MAY 12, 2026 MAY 26, 2026 THURSDAY, MAY 28, 2026 FY 2026–2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STUDY SESSION JUNE 9, 2026 (ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026–2027 BUDGET) JUNE 23, 2026 NO MEETING JULY 14, 2026 (DARK) JULY 28, 2026 January 5–7, 2026: CCCA Legislative Tour in Sacramento, CA May 14–17, 2026 (Tentative Dates): CCCA Annual Municipal Seminar July 9–12, 2026: ICA Summer Seminar June 4–7, 2026: U.S. Conference of Mayors Annual Meeting in Long Beach, CA January 15, 2026: State of the City Address January 21–23, 2026 (Sacramento): League of California Cities New Mayors & Council Members Academy May 7–8, 2026: SCAG Regional Conference and General Assembly in Palm Desert, CA February 9-13, 2026: HBCSD Ski Week February 20-22, 2026: ICA Winter Seminar in Santa Barbara, CA January 28–30, 2026: U.S. Conference of Mayors Winter Meeting in D.C. February 20-22, 2026: ICA Winter Seminar in Santa Barbara, CA June 12, 2026: HBCSD Summer Break Begins Summer Vacation Season Passover begins at sunset on April 1, 2026 and ends at nightfall on April 9, 2026 (No work permitted) April 6–10, 2026: HBCSD Spring Break Page 1326 of 1339 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2026 (Regular Meeting Times: Closed Sessions at 5:00 PM and Open Sessions at 6:00 PM) Page 2 of 2 (Revised 5-7-26) NO MEETING AUGUST 11, 2026 (DARK) AUGUST 25, 2026 SEPTEMBER 8, 2026 SEPTEMBER 22, 2026 OCTOBER 13, 2026 OCTOBER 27, 2026 NOVEMBER 10, 2026 NO MEETING NOVEMBER 24, 2026 (DARK) THURSDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2026 CERTIFICATON OF NOVEMBER 2026 ELECTION, INSTALLATION OF NEW OFFICERS, AND ELECTION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE DECEMBER 8, 2026 NO MEETING DECEMBER 22, 2026 (DARK) Rosh Hashanah begins at sunset on September 11, 2026 and ends at nightfall on September 13, 2026 (No work permitted) Yom Kippur begins at sunset on September 20, 2026 and ends at nightfall on September 21, 2026 (No work permitted) September 4–6, 2026 (Tentative Dates): CCCA Annual Fall Educational Summit Summer Vacation Season Winter Holiday Season Chanukah begins sunset of December 4, 2026 and ends nightfall of December 12, 2026 (work permitted, except Shabbat – Friday evening to Saturday evening) September 23–25, 2026: League of California Cities Annual Conference at Anaheim Convention Center Thanksgiving Week November 11, 2026: Veteran’s Day Holiday November 3, 2026: General Election (Three City Council Seats) Page 1327 of 1339 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 18, 2026 Open Session 6:00 PM Council Chambers 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Members Present: Chairperson David Grethen, Vice Chairperson Thor Legvold, Commissioner Janice Brittain, Commissioner Scott Hayes, Commissioner Kathy Dunbabin Staff Present: Public Works Director Joe SanClemente, City Engineer Saad Malim, Associate Engineer Andrew Nguyen, Management Analyst Michael Dell’Amico _____________________________________________________________________ 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Grethen called the Open Session to order at 6:03 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Management Analyst Michael Dell'Amico. 3. ROLL CALL Chairperson Grethen, Vice Chairperson Legvold, Commissioner Brittain, Commissioner Dunbabain, and Commissioner Hayes are Present. Andrew Nguyen announced a quorum. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Motion to Approve the Agenda Moved by: Commissioner Kathy Dunbabin Seconded by: Commissioner Janice Brittain Ayes (5): Chairperson David Grethen, Vice Chairperson Thor Legvold, Commissioner Kathy Dunbabin, Commissioner Janice Brittain, and Commissioner Scott Hayes Motion Carried Page 1328 of 1339 2 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS Commissioner Brittain announced that the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club will be celebrating its 100th year in Hermosa Beach on Saturday, May 9th. 6. PRESENTATIONS None. 7. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT Public Works Director Joe SanClemente announced the following ... 7.a Director's Update Director SanClemente provided non-CIP updates to the Commission. Director SanClemente announced that the Public Works Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission will hold a joint commission meeting on May 5, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. to highlight the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in preparation for budget development. He explained that this year’s Budget Study Session will be held at the end of April, while the CIP Study Session will be held in late May. The revised schedule is intended to provide an initial budget discussion that will help frame the overall budget picture, as the CIP represents a significant portion of the City’s budget. The joint meeting will also allow for collaborative input from both commissions as staff develops the budget for the upcoming fiscal year. Chairperson Grethen commented on the upcoming joint meeting and expressed appreciation for the revised meeting schedule. Director SanClemente reported that work on the 14th Street Restroom project is nearing completion. Staff is currently working through final landscaping, roof repairs, and renovation details, with the facility anticipated to open within the coming weeks. Director SanClemente also provided an update on the upcoming Caltrans Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) Resurfacing Project. This is a very large project that goes through the County of LA at the Santa Monica city limits down PCH to the southern end of Redondo Beach including the City of Hermosa Beach. He stated that the City has participated in two preliminary coordination meetings with Caltrans and with their contractor. Construction is expected to begin in the City of Los Angeles and proceed southward, with a tentative start date of January 2027 and spending about 3-4 months in each city. Some nighttime work activity is anticipated. Additional utility work updates were provided. California Water Service recently completed the Aviation Boulevard water main replacement mainline work. The Los Angeles County Sanitation District is working on a new sewer force main pipeline replacement on with final pavement restoration anticipated completion in June. Page 1329 of 1339 3 Director SanClemente then discussed the upcoming Main Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Project being completed by the Los Angeles County Sanitation District. The project involves rehabilitation of an over 100-year- old sewer line using a cured-in-place pipe liner over approximately 8,000 feet of pipeline. Standard working hours are anticipated to be Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., although some nighttime and weekend work may occur. The Sanitation District will have its own inspectors onsite throughout the project. Director SanClemente explained that the project will create impacts throughout the City, including the use of temporary bypass piping and trenching in certain locations. The work will be phased in an effort to reduce overall impacts, and the City required that work avoid the downtown area between April 1 and September 30. The following project phases and durations were outlined: • Phase 1: Valley Drive from 2nd Street to 4th Street – 12 working days • Phase 2: 18th Street to 25th Street – 25 working days • Phase 3: 22nd Street and Pier Avenue – 45 working days • Phase 4: 25th Street to 30th Street – 63 working days • Phase 5: 30th Street to 1st Street – 44 working days; phased to avoid conflicts with Greenwich Village undergrounding work • Phase 6: 8th Street to 14th Street – 60 working days; identified as the least impactful option, although temporary trenching across the Hermosa Beach logo area will be required for bypass piping, with restoration to follow Director SanClemente noted that the Los Angeles County Sanitation District will distribute multiple public notices throughout the project. A small number of homes may experience temporary service disruptions, and the Sanitation District will contact affected property owners directly to coordinate accommodations. The contractor for the project is Sancon Technologies, and a dedicated project webpage has been established for public questions and information. Vice Chairperson Legvold asked a question regarding the project. Chairperson Grethen also asked a question regarding project impacts and restoration requirements. Director SanClemente explained that any pavement impacted by the project will be restored to City specifications. Restoration requirements are based on lane width standards; for example, a four-foot trench would Page 1330 of 1339 4 require eight feet of pavement restoration. He also noted that all project costs will be covered by the Los Angeles County Sanitation District. Commissioner Hayes asked a question regarding pavement restoration work on Monterey Boulevard. Staff is currently discussing whether full-width restoration from 2nd Street to Herondo Street can be completed. If full-width restoration is not financially feasible, the restoration would at minimum extend from the centerline to the curb. Staff is coordinating traffic control plans for each phase of the project and is also coordinating with the Green Streets Project. Two-way traffic flow will be maintained throughout construction, and impacts during the first phase are expected to primarily affect the Greenbelt area. Director SanClemente emphasized the importance of completing the sewer rehabilitation project before another emergency failure occurs, similar to the incident previously experienced on Bayview Drive, due to the age of the sewer infrastructure and the volume of flow leaving the City. Commissioners commented on the importance of project coordination and oversight. Staff explained that the City issues permits to utility agencies and outside entities, and City inspectors monitor work to ensure proper procedures are followed. Residents experiencing issues related to construction activities were encouraged to contact the Public Works Department so staff can continue daily monitoring efforts and address concerns as they arise. 7.b Activity Reports Commissioner Hayes had a question regarding the activity report Chairperson Grethen had a comment on the activity report and is glad to see the progress that is being made. 7.c CIP Status Report City Engineer Saad Malim presented the CIP Status Update to the Commission. • CIP 626 – CDBG Sidewalk Improvements: This biannual project is slated to begin in April 2026. Improvements will primarily occur along Monterey from 2nd Street to 10th Street and are limited to curb ramps and sidewalk improvements. • CIP 630 – Community Center Gas Repair: The project has resumed and is anticipated to be completed within the month. Coordinating with gas company for meter upgrade and make final connections. Page 1331 of 1339 5 • CIP 699 – Parking Structure Lot C Improvements: Multiple coating layers are currently being applied to protect the concrete. The structure is anticipated to be completed and reopened in April 2026. • CIP 619 – Kelly Courts Improvements: The project is nearing completion. Remaining work includes resurfacing and installation of play equipment, with completion and reopening anticipated toward the end of April 2026. • CIP 164 – Hermosa Avenue Green Streets Project: Construction began in February in coordination with the City of Torrance, which is leading the project. The contractor is coordinating directly with Torrance. Residents experiencing impacts were encouraged to contact the Public Works Department. Commissioner Hayes asked about materials being stored on 1st Street. • CIP 114 – Greenwich Village North Undergrounding: Construction began in February 2026. Commissioner Dunbabin expressed appreciation for the undergrounding ceremony and post-event question-and-answer session, noting that residents were thankful for the outreach. • CIP 615 – New City Yard: On January 13, 2026, City Council awarded Cumming Group the Owner’s Representative Services contract. On March 12, 2026, the City selected IDS Group for architectural services. • CIP 438 – Stormwater Drywell Assessment: The City selected Geosyntec to identify alternate locations for potential drywells. The City is coordinating with the City of Redondo Beach on grant funding opportunities and plans to utilize available stormwater funds to keep the project moving forward. Commissioner Hayes inquired about regulatory deadlines associated with the project. Staff explained that the City has compliance requirements to meet and that many cities are currently behind schedule, with potential fines possible for noncompliance. Staff stated that alternate locations are being evaluated to consolidate improvements and further refine project costs. A decision will likely need to be made toward the end of the year regardless of grant funding availability. Staff emphasized the City’s intent to proceed with the project requirements even if outside funding is not secured. Chairperson Grethen commented that this project should be emphasized during the upcoming CIP Study Session and stressed the importance of continued public outreach. Page 1332 of 1339 6 • CIP 115 – Sidewalk Improvement Project: This project is being combined with CIP 106 – Annual Street Improvement Project. • CIP 623 – Pier Structural Rehabilitation: City provided final comments to the structural design team and staff is awaiting final design plans and specs. Staff is also finalizing permitting and awaiting Coastal Commission review and supplemental biological studies required beneath and adjacent to the pier. Staff noted efforts are underway to expedite the process and ideally begin work during the quieter season, although that period also presents more inclement weather conditions. Construction is tentatively targeted to begin in October/November 2026. Staff further noted that grant applications submitted to date have not been awarded due to competitive funding conditions. Staff is finalizing the assessment and cost-benefit analysis and anticipates presenting the item to the City Council on March 24, 2026. Commissioner Hayes and Chairperson Grethen asked follow-up questions regarding the project schedule and funding. • CIP 106 – Annual Street Improvements: Selected streets were adjusted to coordinate with upcoming Caltrans work. Significant work areas include Aviation Boulevard from Pacific Coast Highway to Prospect Avenue and a large portion of Monterey Boulevard from Pier Avenue to Manhattan Avenue. Staff noted efforts are being made to coordinate paving work with other utility and roadway projects. Streets highlighted in yellow on the project maps represent the worst pavement conditions. The project also includes pedestrian crossing improvements and rapid flashing beacons where appropriate. Staff emphasized efforts to maximize efficiencies through coordinated timing and related improvements. • CIP 107 – Annual Slurry Seal: The project now includes slurry sealing of the basketball court area adjacent to Clark Field in order to restore the courts. Commissioner Dunbabin thanked staff for restoring the basketball courts and noted appreciation for the incorporation of safety improvements. Chairperson Grethen asked about CIP 113 – Multi-Space Parking Meters. Staff explained the project has become active again due to increased staff capacity. The project will be implemented in phases, with the first phase replacing existing meters in Lots A, B, and C. Lots D and Pier Avenue will be addressed in a later phase. Staff noted the project requires extensive coordination across departments, particularly regarding parking operations. Commissioner Hayes asked about annual sewer improvement projects. Staff responded that completing sewer improvement projects annually is Page 1333 of 1339 7 not always realistic due to the extensive design timelines required. Staff noted efforts are made to coordinate sewer improvements with paving projects, although improvement locations may differ depending on infrastructure needs. Staff concluded by noting the importance of maintaining projects within the CIP program in the event emergent needs arise requiring dedicated funding. Staff stated the City currently has 20 active projects, and needs to ensure that each can be responsibly managed. Staff further emphasized that significant oversight is required for outside consultants to ensure projects remain cost-effective and meet City standards. 8. PUBLIC COMMENT Chairperson Grethen opened public comment. The following public comment was provided. In Person Public Comment: None. 9. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS 9.a Response to Public Comments/Questions for Clarification None 9.b Brief Announcements None 9.c Reports on liaison or subcommittee roles, activities, or meetings attended. None 9.d Brief comments on matters within subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission. Commissioner Dunbabin stated she would be unable to attend the May 5 CIP Meeting due to travel outside of the country and inquired about participating remotely via Zoom. She was advised that she may participate via Zoom as a member of the public; however, she would not be permitted to participate as a Commissioner because the travel is not related to official City, State, or Government business. Commissioner Dunbabin stated she would attempt to participate remotely as a member of the public if Wi-Fi access is available. Staff noted that the May 20 meeting remains scheduled due to a potential tree removal item anticipated for the agenda. 10. CONSENT CALENDAR Motion to Approve the Consent Calendar Page 1334 of 1339 8 Moved by: Commissioner Scott Hayes Seconded by: Commissioner Kathy Dunbabin Motion Carried 10.a Action Meeting Minutes for the January 21, 2026 Public Works Commission Meeting 11. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION None 12. PUBLIC HEARINGS None 13. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION None 14. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS None 15. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:21pm Page 1335 of 1339 Power BI DesktopHermosa Beach Police Depar tment Monthly Crime Repor t (April 2026) Arrests and Infractions 0 10 20 Apr 05 Apr 12 Apr 19 Apr 26 16 11 2 14 5 21 2 4 14 12 5 20 2 3 6 24 15 12 9 6 8 20 10 10 12 7 9 6 2 8 7 6 4 1410 59 4 8 116 19 4 9 8 6 6 44 6 5 96 7 7 9 865 Admin Cites Felony Arrests Misdemeanor Arrests Regular Citation Warning Citations Arrests and Infractions 295 Crime Incidents 132 Calls for Service 2,121 Crime Incidents 0 5 10 Apr 05 Apr 12 Apr 19 Apr 26 23 3 9 1 6 5 88 3 Type of Crime 0 10 20 Found PropertyDisorderly ConductTrafficDUIInformation ReportTheftAssaultVandalism Public Nuisance BurglaryNarcoticsStolen VehicleLost PropertyW eaponsFraudMiscellaneousMunicipal CodeVehicle Tampering Court Order ViolationDog BiteFound PersonRecovered Stolen Ve…Resisting ArrestSafekeepingShoplifting12131317 1112 57 476 234 2 2 1 1 12 1 1 1 13 *Crime data is accurate at time of reporting. **Includes crime incidents deemed appropriate for public release. 4/1/2026 4/30/2026  Hermosa Beach Community Crime Map: https://www.communitycrimemap.com/?address=HermosaBeach,CA&crimeTypes=true Calls for Service 50 100 Apr 05 Apr 12 Apr 19 Apr 26 79 61 115 47 55 87 71 58 53 91 Page 1336 of 1339 Power BI Desktop Monthly National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) Data 0 20 40 60 2026 January 2026 February 2026 March 2026 April 39 43 45 53 10 8 18 28 22 31 25911 6 10 Offense Categor y Crimes Against Persons Crimes Against Property Crimes Against Society Year 2026   Month Multiple …   National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) Data - Category Totals by Month Crimes Against Persons Crimes Against Property Crimes Against Society 0 10 20 2 18810 20 30 28 2531 22 6 8 10 12 9 1011 6 Jan 2026 Feb 2026 Mar 2026 Apr 2026 Police Depar tment - Crime Dashboard Offense Category Breakdown (21.11%) (58.89%) 36 (20%)38 106 FBI Definitions for National Incident- Based Reporting System (NIBRS): https://ucr.fbi.gov/nibrs /2018/resource- pages/nibrs_offense_de finitions-2018.pdf 180 Total Crimes Page 1337 of 1339 Power BI Desktop National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) Data - Month over Month % Change 0 20 40 60 80 -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% January February March April 76 70 78 69 39 43 45 53 -42% 18% 10% 5% Prior Year Crimes Current Year Crimes MoM % Change Year 2026   Month Multiple …  Police Depar tment - Crime Dashboard 2026 Year 180 # of Crimes National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) Data - Month over Month % Change -40% -20% 0% 20% 2026 January 2026 February 2026 March 2026 April -41.79% 10.26%4.65% 17.78% Page 1338 of 1339 Offense Type Apr Mar Diff % Change 2026 2025 Diff % Change 2026 2025 Diff % Change Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter 0 1 -1 -100.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 1 0 1 N.C. Negligent Manslaughter 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 1 0 1 N.C. Kidnapping/Abduction 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 0 1 -1 -100.0% Forcible Rape 0 0 0 0.0% 0 1 -1 -100.0% 0 1 -1 -100.0% Forcible Fondling 1 0 1 N.C.1 1 0 0.0% 1 3 -2 -66.7% Aggravated Assault 1 0 1 N.C.1 6 -5 -83.3% 4 21 -17 -81.0% Simple Assault 16 9 7 77.8%16 1 15 1500.0%34 12 22 183.3% Intimidation 0 1 -1 -100.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 4 6 -2 -33.3% Total Crimes Against Persons 18 11 7 63.6%18 9 9 100.0%45 44 1 2.3% Offense Type Apr Mar Diff % Change 2026 2025 Diff % Change 2026 2025 Diff % Change Arson 0 0 0 0.0% 0 1 -1 -100.0% 0 1 -1 -100.0% Burglary/Breaking & Entering 2 7 -5 -71.4% 2 9 -7 -77.8% 23 28 -5 -17.9% Counterfeiting/Forgery 0 1 -1 -100.0% 0 9 -9 -100.0% 7 20 -13 -65.0% Destruction/Damage/Vandalism of Property 7 8 -1 -12.5% 7 10 -3 -30.0% 23 24 -1 -4.2% Embezzlement 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 0 1 -1 -100.0% Extortion/Blackmail 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 1 2 -1 -50.0% False Pretenses/Swindle/Confidence Game 2 2 0 0.0% 2 3 -1 -33.3% 16 15 1 6.7% Credit Card/Automatic Teller Fraud 1 0 1 N.C.1 1 0 0.0% 1 6 -5 -83.3% Impersonation 0 1 -1 -100.0% 0 1 -1 -100.0% 4 2 2 100.0% Identity Theft 0 4 -4 -100.0% 0 3 -3 -100.0% 9 9 0 0.0% Robbery 0 0 0 0.0% 0 1 -1 -100.0% 0 5 -5 -100.0% Pocket-picking 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 0 2 -2 -100.0% Purse-snatching 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 0 1 -1 -100.0% Shoplifting 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 3 7 -4 -57.1% Theft From Building 0 0 0 0.0% 0 3 -3 -100.0% 0 5 -5 -100.0% Theft From Motor Vehicle 0 2 -2 -100.0% 0 2 -2 -100.0% 5 20 -15 -75.0% Theft of Motor Vehicle Parts/Accessories 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 0 10 -10 -100.0% All Other Larceny 8 10 -2 -20.0% 8 13 -5 -38.5% 42 64 -22 -34.4% Motor Vehicle Theft 3 3 0 0.0% 3 0 3 N.C.14 9 5 55.6% Stolen Property Offenses 2 3 -1 -33.3% 2 6 -4 -66.7% 6 13 -7 -53.8% Total Crimes Against Property 25 41 -16 -39.0% 25 62 -37 -59.7% 154 244 -90 -36.9% Offense Type Apr Mar Diff % Change 2026 2025 Diff % Change 2026 2025 Diff % Change Drug/Narcotic Violations 3 3 0 0.0% 3 7 -4 -57.1% 16 27 -11 -40.7% Drug Equipment Violations 5 5 0 0.0% 5 5 0 0.0% 17 23 -6 -26.1% Pornography/Obscene Material 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 0 2 -2 -100.0% Weapon Law Violations 2 1 1 100.0%2 2 0 0.0% 10 11 -1 -9.1% Animal Cruelty 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0.0% Total Crimes Against Society 10 9 1 11.1%10 14 -4 -28.6% 43 63 -20 -31.7% Total Crimes Against Persons 18 11 7 63.6%18 9 9 100.0%45 44 1 2.3% Total Crimes Against Property 25 41 -16 -39.0% 25 62 -37 -59.7% 154 244 -90 -36.9% Total Crimes Against Society 10 9 1 11.1%10 14 -4 -28.6% 43 63 -20 -31.7% Total Group A Offenses 53 61 -8 -13.1% 53 85 -32 -37.6% 242 351 -109 -31.1% N.C. Not Calculable. To calculate the percentage change use Time 1-Time 2/Time 2 = a number x 100= % change. You cannot divide a number by 0 and receive a valid number. Summary of Reported Offenses (*) Offenses are counted using the FBI Units of Count for Crime This report is valid as of 05/14/2026 and is subject to change This report is PRELIMINARY and the counts may change as the formal report is completed. 2026 April YTD HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 2026 National Incident Based Reporting System Crimes Against Persons - Group A Offenses 2026 April YTD Crimes Against Property - Group A Offenses 2026 April YTD Crimes Against Society - Group A Offenses Page 1339 of 1339