HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC_Minutes-69.08.04_Unsignedsy� ,r "F"�ag F9 fF' " A? ME :ic+r Cj" Till-,
R'e,f .rsg� :� 3a%e `,F. d'
9�IM"'E? O HE 'REGUAlun 1v����x� 6'i �� i'?.�3:lS��� iry 61 �.F��i�r, .�4��Bg
1146 OMICIL VM& M, CITY MALL, NEB .M BEAU,, Q-1 M0NOJ9'� AUSUST
~' 4, 19L'59, AT 8400 P.M.
MI IM WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT & A p.m.
ROLL QALL - Present: Com. Armar, Collis, llami i Wn, HIMS1 , "oble,
Stabler
Absent � Chairman Boi ce
lotion was made by Com. WcWe, secoaded by C e Coll is, to approve
the minutes from the regular me-etlaq of July 21, 1969 as submitted.
Motion carried unanknously.
Election of new Planning Co fission officers was postpoaad until all
Commissioners could be present.
Cam. Noble read to the Coni5miisjon the letter to be moaned to Norman
Reeves, and all Commissloiters present signed the letter.
dlppl;catica for a varlance by Allan Jucka_q from requirements of Sec-
tion $06 riff, CFty Zoning Ordinance N.,,S. 154. as sinnded, as applled to
lot 9, block 117, of "aka3speare TFact, In an 4-2 zone, kMown as 22
and 229 31st Street, In order to constructs a two-family dwelling on a
Ij-,t having a total area of 21OU square feet Instead of the 2400 square
feet normally required by ordinance.
Planning Director explained to the CCiiMi5S10-1 that this ItOM wa:5 CC"
tinued In order to give the aisplira.1t tims to submit aievaticns and a
ge,ieraal plot place showl,rg what he would construct If granted the
vi�iriance. He stated that his offlce rerelved these plans the day rof
the meeting and hed not had time to review them In detail. He gave
the pla,as to the C_-4mxssioa for ravlsn,.
The applicant proposes a duplex with one bedroom apartwnt oa ground
floor and three bedrom apartma.it on 5ecrind floor. He proposes 20
root rear yard. The alley gra.itIng access to the proposed duplex is
d0 fact wide. it is recsmgndad th-3t applicant offer to dedicate 5
feet of hIs property In the future Lt order to allow the City to widen
the alley.
M anal as 01 ractor stated that this request sperm to Freet. all four of
ti^e required cAnsideratSons for grantiaS a varlancel Wvevsro sWU
3a pos i ti o.a on the neighbors could l acur bacauwe of the narrowness of
the alley.
Publlc hearing opened at 800 p.M.
Al lame Juckes, applicant, stated he had nothing new to add.
Cam. Col%is quostioned Mr. Juc�Lss as to dimirrsicns of his PrOPOssd
d plax. yhe Cormissloll cams up with figures of 1080 square feet far
the threes bedrots unit and 565 square feet for the oaae bedroom unit.
yhese di alsions are less than the mlraimt.,Tj requirements being considered
for R-3 zones.
Planning Director stetnr;2, twat the appljcant could go into the rear
yard an axdd'.t i onel 7 feet a,ad s t l l 1 m i nta i n L130 ragW red roar yard
grad turn -around area. Hr. 3uckas indicated t€ rst :;e WOuld be t-'11111aa�
to increase the square foDtage of each of his units.
Cater, Hamilton stated he did aot feel the Comission cold accept plot
plans that were not precise.
Cv 44m. Arcs stated he had gone tibraugh th; s al ley and that i t was a
real mess- yho entire alley appears tote in a state of decay.
Cmm. Ctal t l s stated he wouW be In favor of 3 rant l nq the request If Oe
applicant a.�aWd bring the o.qe badr apart ,at up to m1n1Gwm pr aaed
requ€ r -cams. He felt the GOndl tiers fOr graRtlrag had Wb-- a [,stet. others
i r. th5 s area ha-ja the sumo privilege as applicant Is seeking.
Cam. Stabler stated he would i lie to del,ay this request for two
three moths until the C amA ss i on has t ims to finish their rery 1mv of
the proposed mInjum standards.
Motion knacks by Corr:. Collis, secotadad by Ca , Hamilton, to grant the
request of Allan Jud es for a variance 6n ardor to cram&truct a duplex
an a lot having 2100 square fact Instead of the 2400 square feet ree-
guirad by Ordinance. *VtiOn fallad to pass as ftlicwst
AYES: Conn. Collis, Roble
NOES.- Cam. Armer, Hami i ton. Hica i , Stabler
Motion spade by Come Stabler, seconded by Come HaMlltan, to adopt
Roe oli utico P.C. 154-744 P €iesayf ry2 diQ regLmst of Al 1 an Our- yes for a
variance srrc a Sactlen 506 of City Zoning OrdInance, In order to allom
a dupiu n ara R-2 Zom, ass a Jot iajiviag 21UG square feet instead Of
F:hz 2LWU sWire feat raqulrod € y Grdlnanze, an property located at
225 & 229 31st StreetR genial based an following considerations:
�Zaquest (10e5 rot most %,Q of t;,s ss".awings required for granting of a
variancs; that is, Sao exceptional circtastaaces, and could he makerlaiiy
detrime-ital to tiA puW is welfare; and precise plans presented to •s
mi ssto a were inrwp;eta and did ,tact meet the requtramants of the
praised miealrrrum stmidards presently tirades' consideration by the Camis-
si®.)a It should be exaxed, however. that then Qpplicailt has agreed to
mat the ar►1nk%m standards for unit size. Applicant will have further
oppaartr..ity to prege8tat precise plans„ especially after the density
standards which the staff and use Ca=iss6on are studyl" have been
cmplete; and further .Fat the decrial of this variants will prevent
fairer hardship in thl- area, ansd that, on these grounds It i% cw--
sidered that than variances request des not meet the oajori ty &pproval
of the Crarmisslon. Notions carried as follows:
AYES: Com. Armor, Collis. Hamilton, ton, Himal. idle, Stabler
NOES: Iona
CHANRE OF ZOK 69a$
Public hearing to consider a change of land use ao:as claassificatiora on
lots 1 thrv=3h 7 of blocks 19. 20, 21 and 22 of Hermosa Beach Tract,
loczted between 18th Street and 22nd Street and between Beach Drive
and the Strand under provisions of Article 15 of City Zoning Ordinance
I.S. 154, as s.d.
Planning Director explained that this request was continued from a
previous rmtIng in order to give the proponents an opportunity to
prepare a petitions to circulate to fnter'ested property owners in the
area„ He stated that as of this time hls office had received 15
petitions. Wo property owners were in favor of the change of zone
and 13 were against the change. Four of the owiaers against the change
list addresses oa the Strand.
Public hearing opened at 8:40 p.m.
Dillon Perrino, 52 20th Street. Hermosa Beach, presented the Ccmv.Isslon
with 42 more sealed petitions from property owners. He stated that he
used the same tax ro;1 nos in sending out his petition as the Planning
DGpartmaat used in Sending out postw- rds. His l fist consisted of 40
uut-of-tvwa property mnors and 76 local a-�ners in the affected area
and 300 feet beyond this area.
Comm. Noble read to the Commission the petition sent out by Hr. Perrino
and his assistoats to the property owners.
Robert Prenter, 2026 Strand, Hermosa mach, questioned the validity of
the questionnaire. He stated he owned five lots and was given the
opportunity to vote only otace, He presented a petition sigaed by 14
of the 28 property owners la the affected area. These awncers were for
the change of zone No stated that out of the 75 str=tures on the
walk streets, 24 have extra units. Of the 6 new structures built on
the walk streets (they are zoned it®3) one was single-family. one was
an apartme,it cowlex, and four were hoes a,►d incolou units. AccGrding
to City records, 19 of the 28 parcels betweQn 18th Strast and 22rw
Street, acid b;atwaen Seach Drive as7d the Strand. f�ave mul tiplo usa .
`qr ro'bhle read to the Comalssion the petition sent out by Hr. Prenter.
llrs. Phyllis Lombardo, 1908 Strand, Hermosa Beach, stated that she and
her husba.ad live in their Strand hose with an irzrz.f3 apartment. She
stated that before they purchased their hf=.— m variance was granted to
build the two bedroom income apartment. She wished the Comission to
know she was against R42 zoning because if her income apartment were
to burn down she would not want to rebuild. She was against mere un-
desirables la the area, which she felt would come in if incase units
were added to residences.
` Cl7�ca.,�2{„ } i `i`P"T :�Y"[""�, nr $^n`4;��1}�' .g„ a F^i &L;t �a .�;7✓•�
R£c(izrd Nul"3age-•. 319 Gentry Strut. Uernl0s�D Oeach, wlsbe6 to know
hw.s this aroa "s designated on the tester Pier , Qo,snn. Armr trait#
him It was desigoated for medium density.
Robert Prenter, 2020 Strand, Hermosa ®each, stated that Nrs. Lod rdof's
hoe was advertised In the Daily Creeze as "home plus income property"
on the Strand.
Mrs. Alfred 1:cwm,zn, 2024 Strand, Hermosa ifeach, stated that the ocean -
view property located on the Strand was so limited that It world have
to go to multiple dwellings In order to share the vier. She stated
that the people who have property on the Strand would not use their
property for undesirable tenants.
Nrs. Robert (Patton, 2028 Strand, Hermosa Mach, wished to know who
started this rezoning action. She would not like to sae R-2 in this
area. She stated that she liked R-1 zoning, but If the City desired
a higher density she bauld be In favor of R-3 zoning. She did not
wish to see this became a transition area.
Comm. Collis stated that with R-2 usage there might be a coisolida-
tion of lots.
Mrs. Patton stated she would like to see her property remain R-1 for
a few more years and then change to R-3 so she could build and use this
property for income purposes.,
Ted Scott, 63 19th Court. Hermosa beach, stated he was against the
change to R-2 for three: reazons: 1. 00 pat. sea how this w111 broaden
ttm tax base. 2. ®o not s;i�a how this chsnge will imProve the ft-acUty
or condition of the area. 3. have yet to heir a good a4rgwvnt for
the proposed change of zone.
i?'",oger Creighton, 1101 2nd Street, Nsrmosa Reach. wished to know If
rm4lm. density n-m-ant multiple units. Comma. NJ= -el stated that medium
dei)siru 15 31 to 45 dallpng waits per acre. 1f all the property were
developed R-2 th 8 s would be greater than and l um density.
Rossi rgr•iggs, 46, 20th Court, Hermose ileach. stated that she felt this
area should be zoned R-2 Instoad of R-3. If a property owimr gets a
good toaant, he can keep this tenoot by keeping the rent low.
PAry Donahugh stated she owned a vz"n� lot can the Strand in the area
considered for rezoning. She stated site could not afford to build
just one house on this property, but if i t were zoned fs 2 she could
afford to Improve her property.
M a N. Shaw, 49 20 th Street, Hermosa Be.' cb, stated that no p roper ty
owner supports the City - c arclal enterprises support the City.
An increase in density should be considered with what It brings.
Transients affect the City adversely.
Robert English, Pam®.). 363, Hermosa ftach, stated that the majority of
the hamas on the Strand are used for multiple unI ts. He vxmId like
to go R-2 with the majority. Of the 28 units. 14 are two or more units
per lot.
s nA .�,
pl annLhns E,.�y�Z5i Ys a utos
Public hearing closed at 9:15 p.m.
Planning Wrector flair04-,d opc- Ong thw sealad pigtitions presenWd by
Mr. Perrim and Informd the GOWJ ss iOra of &.6 results. NO sti"Od
that of the 57 petitions reap" to: 46 wished no change of zone.
Of these 46, 7 had Strand addresses. 11 responses were for a change
of zone. Of these 11, 2 had Strand addresses.
r�aisz-qav Collis wWlalned to the audience that the Planning Coamission
roust look for the better planning of the land. The consolidation of
land Is much more desirable and the City should take a serious look
at this matter and consider a higher and better use.
Cmm. Noble wished to racnrntzend that Chaircmn of Comisslon appoint
citizen cami.teas for and alnst the rezoning, planning ecw1sslon
should then havo a special session with the c itt-oss to Near .O1 i
the pros and cons for and against the rezoning.
Motion was mede by Comm.Nubia. $6GOa:d3d by C0010 111 £gym 1 . to continue
public hearing pending the fcrH0tio.j o, comiaittnss for and against the
rezoning. PuWc hearing to be continued to Septembar 15, 1969• No-
tion carried as follows:
AVaS: Com. Armar, Collis. Hamilton. illaml, Noble. Sutler
NOBS: NOW
Coate. Armor asked Interested citizens in the audience who lived In the
affected area to Indicate by a show of hands if they would like to
serve on the camIttees. ew.atittes for the rozaning to consist Of:
Paul Abbott, 1900 Stran4; Ors. Kelsey, 1942 Strand; art Pronter,
2020 Strand. Comittee against the rezoning to consist Of: Mrs -
Lombardo, 1908 Strand; firs. Patton, 2028 Strand; and one other w.&*ar
still to be appolated.
Cam. Hannllton left mating at 9:30 P-m-
caAME OF Yen 69-6
Pudic hearing to con%Wzr & changQ of land use zone classification
request by Kennard Vsvoiopmnt, Inc. from- A with U-3 potential
to K-3, er,6l tlple fw. 14 y , on log; I l , blow L; Block 0; and block H,
including alandcnad rai i road =•ig,t of waYS, lac -ted between 2nd Street
grad South School; and %jallay nriva arsd Cuipsr Street, under provisions
of Articlaa 15 of City Zoning Ordin@RcO %S. 154, as wown4dad.
P�U-ISE PLAN
Precise Plan as required In Section 1103; precedent to above zone change
by Kenland Development Company, Inc.
PNa�ing Director staged that a PrelAso l'1a� has been submitted showing
64 units substantially as Indicated by the appllc:writs during the
previous zone change hearing. The Galan shcrws 11 buildings vaFylag from
3 units to 8 units ea&ze units are to be cIurrmhousell or 60studlopl
units, two story., wi t1v n-,* ona. �; Ivinq :aamya ar below anot4or unI t"
The units are 3 and 4 baddror= cal th f1mr areas of 4 et 1600 and 2000
sq!mrs feet. 'rne Comission's X-3 studies rescam pnd (tentatively) a
standard of 1200 &W 1500, respectively, for 3 and 4 beadrGam emits*
The total building coverage of the site Is about 50 percent. A sub-
,
;iz-aEtal "r�jouat of the ground are& is parmd for dr lvGways. The
applimits'Nave obtained the coil well located on the property and it
will also be developed.
Publ i c hearing opened at 9: 4a p.m.
Moat Noward, real estate agent representing _40,0aflud OeVOI-Wrs stated
he did -at expect a:ny p�rvblz�ts In meeting roquested s mdltlon .
Comm. idle asked Nr. Howard if he had read the recommendations from
the staff. Hr. Iftmard stated that he had met with the staff and had
gone over the race=-ndatlons wa�la them.. His only objection war. to
the receammnda3 t 10n that 35 vi s i tar pz� rk i ng spaces be peov i ded. He
would like to des more resexrch with the architect and try to work out
seaesrathing that will be suitable to both the developer and the City.
Planning Director stated he recommended visitor parking because there
Is no parking on Valley Drive and 2nd Street is over parked now with
beach traffic.
Crm,a. Collis rounded to Sir. rd a larger turning radius than
the minimun 23 feet. Also he would t Ilse to see more parking than the
minieem lJ to t ratio re quIreid. He suggested anything up to 4 to I
would be good.
Hr. Hooard Info.-wqd tM Conmission that the price on these caidoWniw z
would be from $31,000 to $43,000.
Roger Creighton. 1101 2nd Street. Hermosa Beach, stated he would like
to sae this processed as soon as possible because It will Improve the
area and will spread throughout the City.
Public hearing closed at 10215 p.m.
Cerra. Collis wished to see off -strut parking over the 2 to 1 ratio
required.
Motion made by Gmini. Mtn??ie, seconded by Corr?e CvU s s, to accept the
precise plans suNnittad by Keaniand Deve$lep-mant Cw*eny. Inc. for lot
11 block !; Block ft. and Block N, Including abandoned railroad right
of way, subject to the fol 1 ow i ng cwd i t ions:
1.. Parking spaces for visitors be provided to satisfaction of
Planning Director.
2. final Landscape plans be approved by staff (Parks. Recreation.
and Planning Director) .
3. Elevations be s�-�Ittsd for Planning Can:-�Issaon approval prior
to Issuance of a buildlog peewit..
notion carried as follows:
AYES: Comm. Armor, Collis, Himal, ftble, Stabler
WKS: MGM
r-
�Otiaolj by C*-L3mo Nqh e, seconded by Cemn. Cal 1 ise to grant xohtia
change ffrc-,� 0 with R-3 potcnt$a1 to R-3, on lot Ile blocs Ids ■lock
n; and D 1 ock H, Including abaandwed railroad right of Tray. to ICenland
DeveIopmnt CcnVmay, Inc.. subject to the precise plan conditions.
Nation passed as follows. -
AYES: Came. Amer, Collis, Miami, Noble, Stabler
OIES: FIone
Rot tm rode by Camr, ", lo. seconded by Com. Collis, to adcPt ftsol u-
t i on P.C. 354-716 o recoi anding to the City Cte 4d i a CiMnge Of 2000
frm fA w4 th R-3 Potianti8l to R-3 on iot 11, Mock L; Oilock H; Mock W,
$ ncl ud i n abandoned rai 5 rozd right of way, a5 requasted by Konl and
€le vet opamjt Crx ny, Inc. It leas baan detarmlrszd by the Planning
Csmiml3sion that this typa of develo -st is ssui tabus for this location.
Notion carried as follows:
ATKS: Cown, Armor, Collis. Himmel. ale, Stabler
tS: hone
SUBDIVISION #23299
6totfona made by Coro. Noble, seconded by Co-0r Himml . to ad%t P,0501 ts-
tion P.C. 154-746, approving subdivision twitted by ::emend DavelOa-
am"t Company, Inc.. on lot 11 Block L; i;iock 4 and Stock N. Including
abandoned railroad right of way, subject to following condi tionst
1. All drivmays to ie_% u'- mit'lMn of 20 fsl�t wide, all turn around
areas a rsirslmwe of 23 feet r�.
2. Mail at base of slope to be approved by Sullding Departmwt.
3. Sidewalkst 5 foot concrete sidewalk to be provided on Valley
Dr$va; 71 foot concrete sidaw-aik to be provided on Second
Street.
4. Curb and gutter to be relocated on Second Street to 8 feet
from property I Ins.
5. Fire hydrants to be provided In sixes and number specified
by Fire Department.
6. All power and telephone lines an or abutting property to be
untlargrounded.
7. Surface waters to drain to street or an Improved stone drain,
U
Planning ga lssia n minutes Pag,3 8 August 4, 1969
i1® Sewer system will be a private system and shall mast Building
Code requiramntsa Will need separate trunk lines and If not
gravity flow, provide two ptalp stations to eaaln line.
9. Easements to be provided for all utilities not leaving direct
access to public right of ways.
10. Retaining wall subject to rev ew and approval of City Engineer.
11. No street trees to be provided of this
12. A tentative. awap of th-. wndminium "parca 1 s" to be ski tied
and approvad prior to approval of final ezps. Such tentative
map to show:
a. Approximte location of each condominium "parcel".
b. Approximate size aa-d shape of aach "parcel".
c. Numbering systems for condominiums to be: A-1, A -a,
A-3, A-4; Dal, 9-2. 3-3, etc. for each set of buildings,
or a slMlar system: acceptable to the City.
13. 1" areas subject to Inundation or storm water overflow and
direction of flow on f1W map.
14. Coi»truet approved stoma drain Inlet and any connecting pipe
as my be found necessary on Second Stns t at location approved
by City Engineer.
15. Awmiva and rep-Goa;;;�act all fill �:ress to City Standards.
16. Hiniow surface grade shall be 2 percent. or there under 2 par -
cent hydral de_ shall be st.5bbml tted demnstrating
that store waters can be satisfar-torHy managed, prior to
approval of a final map.
17. Subject to approval of City Attorney; execution of subdivision
agreaftnt; Precise Plan aegrcoL-ant.
18. Post a bond sufficient to guarantee perfori-mnee of above
agreemiats 0
Reason for grantla-Q tlz that: It has bsaeaz daterelaad by the Planning CoM-
missial that this type of subdivislon Is sm1table for thin locatlon4
Notion passed as follows:
AYES: Come Armor, Collis, Hirs-insl, Noble, Stabler
MOSS:
Motion made by Crrx,, Armor, seconded by Cc=, . Stabler, to request the
iluilding Oepaarmant to supply to the Cemission a list of all major
developments and alterations taking place 1,i the City. notion carried
as follows:
AYES: Cow. Amr, Collis. 144w 1. Mcb1s. Stabler
mast, Now
Sat a date of public hearing to consider zwvmLind€ng Section x W4 of
City Zoning Ordinance.G►s Armr sot the agreo4 up%•n d3te Of Pub tic
hearing far August 113, 1969.,
C�tjn&wd public hearing to grand Sections 600, 606, 607, and 800-C of
Ordinanca MS, 154. as xrandcA, to pirovida for a greater variety of
developumnt, standards in the i-3 Xona and to ;aak* C-3 zoo ce,ifom to
Remral Plan provisions.
Discussion of proposed Zoning Ordinance opandmnts concerning R-3
usas and deveicp:Tw A standards,
Appoi ntaaant of C al ttaes
t;yard of toning AdjnaAmeats - report by Punning Director (City Planner).
Oro ton redo by Cmw, Army, sec4F died by COM. NOW*, all Wmva listed
l t "we wntinuad to August M, 11,069 mating.
v°seting adjourned at IW52 p.m.