Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC_Minutes_74.08.12MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD IN'THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, HERMOSA BEACH, ON MONDAY, AUGUST 12, 1974, AT 7:30 P.M. Meeting called to order by Chairman Collis at 7:31 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Comm. Burt, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger, Chiu (arrived late) and Chmn. Collis Absent: Comm. Hough APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Comm. Burt, seconded by Comm. Haller, to approve the minutes of the meeting of July 22, 1974, of the Planning Commission as submitted. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Haller and Peirce Noes: None Abstain: Comm. Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis Absent: Comm. Hough, APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS None PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO N.S. 154 a. Proposed revised R-3 zone. b. Environmental Impact Report City Planner Crawford said this revision was initiated by the Planning Commission in conjunction with R-1 and R-2 revisions which have already been approved and sent to City Council for consideration. Recommended changes include: usable open space modified to make clearer and easier to administer; permitted density decreased to require 1000 square feet of lot area for each dwelling unit; construction of multiple dwelling units (3 or more) made subject to Conditional Use Permit by Planning Commission; development of single-family dwellings by standards of R-1 or R-2, whichever applies; and sign provisions removed in anticipation of adoption on the proposed sign ordinance. He said Section 600, Item 2, is taken from the existing ordinance; the figure 2400 is misleading since it cannot be realized, as a multiple dwelling (three units) must be built on a lot of no less than 3000 square feet. He suggested changing 2400 to 3000 in both instances. He said Section 605, exception, is new and the language is ambiguous; suggested adding the words "for the property in question." The prepared Resolution is based on the existing General Plan, not on recommendations for revision to the General Plan. The Preliminary Environmental Impact Report is based on adoption of these amendments. Comm. Rosenberger asked the total number of lots that would be affected in any way by the proposed R-3 changes; and, how many lots would be adversely affected by the up -grading of the minimum square footage requirement per unit. Mr. Crawford replied that almost every R-3 lot would be affected. To find whether the change was adverse one would have to calculate which lots are on the border line under the present 950 square footage requirement. He said most R-3 lots are 30 ft. wide; those 25 feet are currently restricted to two units so would not change. R-3 lots in low density zones would be adversely affected. He said the number of lots affected can be determined. Landscaping was discussed; Mr. Crawford said no further resolution was made concerning landscaping due to the recognition that all new development would require Conditional Use Permit and design review. Comm. Rosenberger asked whether a chart is available clarifying the ordinance changes and the statistics involved, and if the chart would be a part of the ordinance. --2-- 8/12/74 PC MINUTES Mr. Crawford said three charts are under preparation; they will not be a part of the ordinance, but will be appended to the ordinance as explanatory material. Public hearing opened 7:51 p.m. Mrs. Coralie Ebey, 2466 Myrtle Avenue, expressed her approval of the proposed amendment. Public hearing closed 7:53 p.m. Chmn. Collis questioned the need for required Conditional Use Permit. Comm. Rosenberger said that when the Planning Commission turned down a plan for a 5-unit condominium, the developer said he could legally build a 7-unit apartment without coming before the Planning Commission. Comm. Rosenberger cited this as a type of blackmail, and said it was not the intention of the Planning Commission to encourage intensive development; that the R-3 zone is an intensively developed zone and should be watched more closely, having such problems as liveability, recreation, etc. Chmn. Collis said in view of later developments taken by the Planning Commission, such as design review, density reduction, increasing lot sizes, it seems unnecessary to require the Conditional Use Permit, He said he is totally against it. Comm. Haller asked if the Design Review Board has specific criteria. Mr. Crawford said they have not yet developed any sort of rigid rules; evaluation is based upon how the project fits in with its surroundings and whether they feel the appearance of the project oould be detrimental or beneficial to the surroundings. Comm. Rosenberger reiterated that he believes the required Conditional Use Permit is necessary; that the statement in the Environmental Impact Report concerning conservation and open space elements and the fact that Hermosa Beach is the most densely populated area in Southern California require close monitoring and observation of any increase in density. Motion by Comm. Burt, seconded by Comm. Rosenberger, to approve Resolution P.C. 154-978 as submitted, approving a revised R-3 zone, with the following corrections: Section 600. 2. change the figure 2400 to 113000" in two instances. Section 604. Exception. Insert "usable" before open space, to read "Up to one-half the required usable open space..." Section 605. Exception. Add, after General Plan, "for the property in question." Ayes; Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis. Chmn. Collis qualified his vote by strongly opposing the condition of Section 600, 2. as he sees no need for Conditional Use Permit in view of all the regulatory provisions within the proposed change. Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None C-74-14PD Request of L. Graziadio for a Commercial Planned Development permit in order to construct a commercial building with three dwelling units on C-2 zoned property located at Pier Avenue and Bayview Drive. Mr. Crawford said this item was continued from the initial public hearing of July 8 to give the applicant an opportunity to make revisions in the plan. The initial proposal showed commercial on Manhattan Avenue as well as Pier with under- ground garages, which has been revised to remove all commercial from Manhattan Avenue. The style is relatively unchanged, with the exception that one solid wall is now left open. The ordinance says literally residential development above commercial, which the initial presentation followed; with the revisions it --3-- 8/12/74 PC MINUTES is now a side -by -side development. Some on -alley parking will be eliminated; a curb cut on Manhattan Avenue will eliminate on -,street parking; no curb cut on Pier Avenue. He said staff recommends that the Environmental Impact Report be evaluated and declared adequate and non -significant, or not adequate and significant, before taking action on the Planned Development request. The Design Review Board will review the exterior design prior to final development plan. Comm. Rosenberg requested review of the statistical information, and also that such information be given in both percentages and square footage with a summary of the statistical information. Public hearing opened 8:33 p.m. L. Graziadio, owner in escrow, asid a new complete set of statistics was not submitted after the suggested revisions in the plan; therefore some the figures were from the old plan. He said the commercial space upstairs will be for offices; downstairs, a dress shop facing Pier. He said there might be three of four offices, but not five. Chmn. Collis expressed concern with the parking spaces provided for commercial use, and asked where employees would park. Comm. Rosenberger recalled that under- ground parking was shown in the previous plan. Mr. Graziadio said the Commission had not approved of tenant and commercial parking together; therefore the commercial on Manhattan Avenue was totally eliminated per request. He said there is metered parking on the street and commercial parking near, by the church; and that it might cost $100,000 to excavate for underground parking due to the soil conditions and proximity of an adjacent house. Comm. Chiu said he preferred the original design. Mr. Graziadio summarized his understanding of the requests of the Commission as to 1) reduce commercial, and 2) eliminate combined parking. He said these have been done. Public hearing closed 8:55 p.m. Comm. Haller said the development looks nice but she would rather have the front parking area closed or camouflaged with landscaping. Comm. Peirce agreed. Comm. Burt asked the applicant if he would object to closing off the parking area with a wall. Mr. Graziadio said he would be happy to do that, and include the landscaping. Chmn. Collis said he thought in concept it is a fine job; he feels it will be a good test of this type of development; and he is concerned with parking and looks to the developer to assume responsibility for the problems created by parking and not force the city to take the responsibility. Comm. Chiu asked if the project could be converted to all residential if the commercial venture is unsuccessful. Chmn. Collis replied that it would require a Conditional Use Permit to be converted either 'way. Motion by Comm. Burt, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to approve with the conditions: that a development schedule be submitted with final development plans; that Design Review Board approval be obtained of exterior decor and signs prior to submittal of final development plans; and that Environmental Impact Report be prepared, and approved and obtained from Board of Zoning Adjustments prior to submittal of final development plans. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None --4-- 8/12/74 PC MINUTES Motion by Comm. Burt, seconded by Comm. Rosenberger, to approve Resolution P.C. 154-979 granting the Commercial Planned Development permit for L. Graziadio for the following reasons: it conforms to the General Plan and density, and it is an experimental proposal never before used in this city, the many things in its favor greatly overruling the unfavorable points. The required findings are satisfied. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None C-74-15PD Request of T.J. Wynne for an Residential Planned Development permit to convert an existing duplex into a 2-unit townhouse condominium at 607 Hollowell Avenue. Mr. Crawford reviewed the project. He said the duplex is so designed that it meets all the criteria for a townhouse condominum: It is in Very Low Density, and has 15.59 dwelling units per acre, which is marginal. He suggested that the Planning Commission request review of the C.C. & R.'s before approval of a final subdivision map. Comm. Peirce noted that the density scale reads 0-15 and 16 and up, and asked where 15.5 fits in; he feels that this request would fit in with the.General Plan, concerning density. Public hearing opened 9:26 p.m. W. A. Ross, representing Mr. & Mrs. T. J. Wynne, said this is an unusually high quality building ideally suited for family occupancy of a stable nature. They will submit C.C. & R.'s which contain a tie -breaker provision. The only responsibilities held in common are the water and general maintenance, and if disputes arise the third party will cast a deciding vote. Mr. Ross will act as the third party initially. This has been approved by the Department of Real Estate. Kenneth Larsen, 120 36th Street, Manhattan Beach, representing T. J. Wynne, said the reason for the request as presented is due to the very high cost of the building, large lot and ocean view. The owner intended to live there, but is now moving; he could not sell as a duplex without losing money. Close public hearing 9:32 p.m. Chmn. Collis said this would not be precedent -making as the Planning Commission has previously approved a tentative map for a two -unit building. Comm. Rosenberger said this is a unique situation to be resolved by the method presented. He said he sees no advantage to the city from this conversion, but sees a potential disadvantage in the city might end up with property owner's dispute. Comm. Burt said that ordinarily he would oppose a two -unit conversion, but this is a unique situation; he thought the investment by the owners would necessitate resolution of any dispute. Chmn. Collis said he would not advocate encouraging small units but tends to accept Comm. Burt's opinion. --5-- 8/12/74 PC MINUTES Mr. Ross said this is a three way subdivision counting each dwelling unit and the common area of setbacks and side yards; each would pay half of the taxes. The C.C. & R's will provide tie -breaking dispute settlement. Motion by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Haller, to allow the two -unit townhouse condominium with the following conditions; That the Planning Commission review the C.C. & R " s; that a landscaping plan be submitted showing the number, type and gallon size of plants; that a permanent irrigation system be provided; that provision for maintenance be a part of the C. C. & R.'s; that a maintenance fund be established for landscaping; and that these revised plans be submitted with the tentative tract map. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, and Peirce Noes: Comm. Rosenberger and Chmn. Collis Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None Motion by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Chiu, to approve Resolution PC 154-980. List the eight findings and state that the building meets the basic townhouse definition (a. through g. of the analysis). More than adequate access for fire- fighting equipment having three street frontages. Include conditions in motion above. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Noes: Comm. Rosenberger Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None Haller, Peirce, and Chmn. Collis Comm. Chiu requested that a copy of the required findings be included as a check list in each staff report; and would like a copy distributed separately. He said he would prefer having both percentage and square footage statistics on the analysis, following that format consistently. Comm. Rosenberger requested that the subject of eliminating gross square footage from the analyses be placed on the workshop agenda. Comm. Burt replied that the City Council has to pass on it before it can be eliminated. C-74-16 Request of E. Talbot to manufacture surfboards as part of a retail business under provisions of Section 801 of N.S. 154, at 904 Aviation Boulevard. Mr. Crawford said Mr. Talbot has not been able to get all of the information since the existing building requires some conversion, and requests continuance until the August 26th meeting. Public hearing opened 10:21 p.m. No one wished to be heard. Closed 10:21 p.m. Motion by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Rosenberger, to continue the public hearing to the workshop meeting, August 26, 1974. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller,Peirce, Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None DETERMINATION OF LEGAL USE - 48-58 NINTH STREET Request of Vories and Robert Schneider to determine whether or not the existing 12 dwelling units is a legally non -conforming use. --6-- 8/12/74 PC MINUTES Mr. Crawford reviewed the analysis of records and existing situation by the Building Department and read a memo from the Building Director. Comm. Chiu asked if the Building Department inspection was a physical inspection on the site. Affirmative. Chmn. Collis asked if there were any parking requirements at the time the units were converted. Mr. Crawford said there were no parking requirements prior to 1948, and after that time units might be built without garages if approved by the Planning Commission. Mr. Grippo said the conversion of the garages into living units was legal and the records are available. Public hearing opened 10:29 p.m. Mrs. Schneider, 48 Ninth Street, said she has owned the building since 1961 and it was 12 units at that time. Regarding item two of the corrections, she said there is an openable bathroom window. Mr. Grippo said, and Chmn. Collis concurred, that the Planning Commission cannot decide on health and safety conditions, but only on the possible zoning violation. Public hearing closed 10:33 p.m. Comm. Peirce said that although the units are very small and do not conform to present standards, he felt they were done legally at the time. Motion by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Burt, to determine that the 12 units at 48-58 Ninth Street are legal nonconforming and shall be allowed. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None Mr. Crawford said it will be pointed out in the statement of findings that this action relates only to the zoning question and in no way affects other violations or non -conformances. C-74-17PD Request of J. Cariker for approval of a preliminary development plan for a 3-unit condominium at 637 Fourth Street. Mr. Crawford said this is a new public hearing for Planned Development of a 3-unit condominium, within General Plan medium density requirements; ground level liveability and recreation space below requirements with the only way to meet them being use of the deck area. It has been approved by Board of Zoning Adjustments and Design Review Board. The 1719 square feet includes the stairway, hall, laundry and storage rooms; the living area having about 1200 square feet which is well above minimum. Public hearing opened 10:47 p.m. John Heltebrake, 228 llth Place, Manhattan Beach, owner, with Mr. Cariker as designer and contractor, appeared before the Commission. Jim Cariker, 1035 Manhattan Avenue, Hermosa Beach, said it is extremely difficult to figure out the open space requirements with both gross and net figures used; would like more specific requirements. He said they have included an extra parking space but could eliminate that for more open space. They have considered putting a Jacuzzi pool in the back. Chun. Collis questioned walking up three stories. Mr. Cariker replied that to provide open space on a small lot they must build higher; the living room is on the top floor for the view; and he prefers to have each garage under its own unit for convenience and noise control. --7-- 8/12/74 PC MINUTES Comm. Rosenberger questioned the,location of the open space in the back away from all the units. Mr. Cariker said if they set the building back farther it would result in more concrete driveway; he prefers the open area consolidated to get a green belt. Public hearing closed 11:06 p.m. Chmn. Collis said the concern at this time is the waiving of the required open space; the decks serve the individual units pretty well. Comm. Haller said the open space on the decks might be a positive factor. Comm. Rosenberger said all the requirements have been met; he would like to see more usable arrangement of the open space. Chmn. Collis asked how the entrances would be treated and how they would be screened from the adjacent area. Mr. Cariker replied that they were planning double doors and stained glass, grape stake fencing and planting. He said they will provide a plan with plant names and count, sprinkler system and fencing. Motion by Comm. Rosenberger, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to approve with the following conditions; that permanent fencing be provided; landscaping along the east side of the common walk to the entrances of the units; that the area in the back not be closed off and that it be permanently landscaped for the enjoyment and use of all three tenants. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None Motion by Comm. Rosenberger, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to adopt Resolution P.C. 154-981 approving the request of J. Cariker. List findings 1-10, page 2 of the analysis except 7. Include all conditions of motion above, adding a condition for soundproofint; that the permit be issued to the applicants and not be transferrable without the Planning Commission's review and approval; and that the preliminary C. C. & R.'s be submitted with the tentative map. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis. Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT #11 Proposed Open Space, Conservation and Scenic Highway Element as prepared by the Planning Commission. Mr. Crawford said a Conservation Element has been appended with information that the state requests. It indicates that the ocean is part of the city and is scheduled for conservation; includes recommendations of the Beach Development Plan. The Scenic Highway Plan Provides for creation of regulations to manage those areas within scenic corridors, the regulations presumably to be in the Zoning Ordinance but not as part of the Element. The only change in the document is the addition of the Resolution recommending it to the City Council. Chmn. Collis brought up the problem of development of property vs. preservation of vistas. Mr. Crawford suggested that this be handled through the zoning ordinance with possible exchange or sale of development rights. Comm. Rosenberger said this could be studied by the Development Committee. Comm. Haller suggested adding Hermosa Avenue to the Scenic Highway Element to get more outside moneys for beautification of the corridors. Comm. Peirce said he would consider that misappropriation of funds. Comm. Chiu said there are some good vistas on Hermosa Avenue; also front yards along the Strand. __8__ 8/12/74 PC MINUTES Public hearing opened 11:44 p.m. No one wished to be heard. Closed 11:44 p.m. Comm. Rosenberger questioned the figure of "just under 1.5 acres per 1000 persons" and asked that it be checked; also objected to the sentence "Without the ocean, Hermosa Beach is physically not much better than Watts," and asked that it be eliminated. Motion by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Rosenberger, to accept Amendment ir11 with deletion of the complete sentence (above) about Watts; addition of Hermosa Avenue as Scenic Highway, and correction of Chart C (changed subtotal 300 to 252). Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: Chmn. Collis Motion by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Rosenberger, to adopt Resolution P.C. 154-982, as submitted, (third page) subject to changes in the motion above. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE N.S. 154 An amendment creating a new land use zone classification to be known as OS Open Space Zone. Public hearing opened 11:58 p.m. No one wished to be heard. Closed 11:58 p.m. Motion by Comm. Rosenberger, seconded by Comm. Haller, to continue to August 26. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO N.S. 154 An amendment to Article 7.5 amending development standards for condominium and community apartment developments. Mr. Crawford said this amendment adds requirements for construction of condominium apartments, and conversion to condominiums. Comm. Haller noted that the requirement for guest parking in the ordinance should be included in the Environmental Impact Report. Comm. Rosenberger suggested striking the last clause in B. 3. "except that spaces may be rented to other owners within the project," as the Planning Commission does not want to encourage this. Public hearing opened 12:06 a.m. No one wished to be heard. Closed 12:06 a.m. The Commission discussed Preliminary Environmental Impact Report 1. a. concerning the benefits of having the open space accessible from a non -sleeping room rather than from a bedroom; it was left as is. Motion by Comm. Burt, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to adopt Resolution P.C. 1540983 recommending revision of the Condominium Ordinance with the following correction: delete "except that spaces may be rented to other owners within the project." Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis --9-- 8/12/74 PC MINUTES Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None 21st Street and Rhodes Avenue Request of L. Graziadio for permission to construct with Zero side yards under provisions of Resolution P.C. 154-717, on property located at 21st Street and Rhodes Avenue. Mr. Crawford said Resolution P.C. 154-717 was passed prior to the establishment of the Board of Zoning Adjustments. It was submitted to the Board of Zoning Adjustments and approved, although they felt there should be a provision for public notice of the proposed zero side yard development because of the impact on the neighborhood, especially in an R-1 zone, since the appearance is that of a duplex. He said if public notice is needed it might be best to go Planned Development, which has a procedure for zero side yard development. Chmn. Collis said the reason for it was to encourage better use of property, but he would favor its use only if shown a presentation of the plans, that is, a preliminary sketch of front elevation and floor plan in 1/8 scale or larger. He said it is the intent they are concerned with. Mr. Graziadio asked if it would come under the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission of Board of Zoning Adjustments. Chmn. Collis said it is within the purview of the Planning Commission; it would not be a variance. REVIEW OF C-74-11 Request of Flagship for interpretation and/or clarification of conditions of approval re: prohibition of mechanical and/or electrical games. Mr. Crawford reviewed a letter sent by Lloyd W. Scott, Flagship, 22 Pier Avenue. The applicant submitted a newspaper account of a new state law on machine -operated games. He also requested changing the opening hour to 11 a.m. for serving of lunches. Mr. Crawford said the change in hours would require a re -hearing. Motion by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Rosenberger, to allow operation of a "foozeball" and a shuffleboard game in the Flagship under the Planning Commission's understanding of its being a non -mechanical or non -electronic game. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None 1331 Manhattan Avenue Request of Weingartner and Benezra for partial change of nonconforming use at 1331 Manhattan Avenue. Mr. Crawford said the request is to partially convert a nonconforming use of a nonconforming building to a conforming use of a nonconforming building. The code does not clearly cover a partial conversion, but says while in nonconforming use, no part of the building may be changed. Mr. Weingartner requests permission to use existing street level apartment as offices for real estate brokerage, and contemplates a small wooden sign. He said the property is zoned C-2, and the entire block is mixed commercial and residential. He said the value of the street floor is commercial, it will reduce density, they have improved the building, built a garage, and are directly adjacent to a city parking lot. --10-- 8/12/74 PC MINUTES Comm. Haller suggested that they apply for a variance to the Board of Zoning Adjustment. Mr. Crawford felt they would be best advised to go for a variance from the provision that while a nonconforming use is established no other use can be considered. 635 Lonfellow Avenue Request of G. Manion for permission to separate a combined lot consisting of two 25 foot lots, located at 635 Longfellow Avenue. Mr. Crawford reviewed and said the action might be to approve the separation of the two lots or may approve Planned Development to put the same number of units on the lot as if they were separated without actual separation. Motion by Coipm. Rosenberger, seconded by Comm. Haller, to continue to August 26th so the applicant may be present. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, Peirce, and Chmn. Collis Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None A-74-2. Referral of Z-74-2 (Alflen) back to Planning Commission by City Council with comment that the City Council intends to grant the appeal from the approval by the Planning Commission. Motion by Chmn. Collis, seconded by Comm. Rosenberger, to continue to August 26. Comm. Haller suggested writing the applicant to ask his intent. So ordered. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Motion by Comm. Chiu, seconded by Comm. Burt, to nominate Comm. Rosenberger for Chairman. Chmn. Collis moved that the nominations be closed. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller Peirce, and Chmn. Collis. Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: Comm. Rosenberger Motion by Chmn. Collis, seconded by Comm. Rosenberger, to nominate Comm. Chiu for Vice -Chairman. Motion by Comm. Rosenberger, seconded by Comm. Chiu, to nominate Comm. Hough for Vice -Chairman. The vote for Comm. Chiu was as follows: Ayes: Comm. Burt, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: Comm. Chiu Motion by Comm. Burt, Seconded by Comm. Peirce, to nominate Comm. Hough for Secretary. Ayes: Comm. Burt, Chiu, Haller, Peirce, Rosenberger, and Chmn. Collis Noes: None Absent: Comm. Hough Abstain: None Chinn. Collis raised the question of what is being done in regard to the violation on the 0ldaker property. He requested a status report to the Planning Commission; and notification to the City Council that actions were taken and findings made with no results. Comm. Rosenberger suggested such actions contain a stipulation that --11-- 8/12/74 PC MINUTES they must be reviewed in six months. Chinn. Collis thanked the members of the Commission for allowing him to be their Chairman for the past year, and aaid it has been enjoyable. City Planner Crawford announced his resignation and advised that the Planning Commission call a special executive meeting, perhaps with City Council to determine what kind of planning service the city wants. Comm. Rosenberger said he would bring the matter up at City Council meeting on August 13. Chinn. Collis said Mr. Crawford became City Planner in May 1968, and commended him for his effort and dedication. He said that through Mr. Crawford's guidance, the city has come a long way in achieving a reasonable and workable plan. Adjournment 1:20 a.m. CERTIFICATION 1 hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach at a public hearing held August 12, 1974. 01 DAT JAMES COLLIS, CHAIRMAN JA PEIRCE, ACTING SECRETARY