HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC_Minutes_75.11.24MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
CI.TY'-..-'.L-L, HERMOSA BEACH, ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 1975, AT 7:30 P.M.
Meeting called to order by Chairman Collis at 7:32 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Comm. Burt, Learned, Rosenberger, Chmn. Collis
Absent; Comm. Boone, Loosli
Also present was Rod Merl, Planning Director
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Comm. Burt, seconded by Comm. Rosenberger, to approve the minutes of
November 10, 1975, as submitted.
Ayes: Comm. Burt, Learned, Rosenberger, Chmn. Collis
Noes: None
Absent: Comm. Boone, Loosli
APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS
Motion by Comm. Burt, seconded by Comm. Rosenberger, to approve Resolution P.C. 154-1076
as submitted.
Ayes: Comm. Burt, Rosenberger, Chmn. Collis
Noes: None
Abstain: Comm. Learned
Absent: Comm. Boone, Loosli
Motion by Comm. Rosenberger, seconded by Comm. Burt, to approve Resolution P.C. 154-1077
as submitted.
Ayes: Comm. Burt, Rosenberger, Chmn. Collis, Comm. Learned
Noes: None
Absent: Comm. Boone, Loosli
822 EIGHT STREET & 821-825 SEVENTH STREET
Proposed three -unit apartment condominium; Robert Beck.
Mr. Merl reviewed the project description and previous Commission action, reflecting
concern with traffic circulation on 8th Street. The Commission, with concurrence of
the applicant, granted a continuance so that modifications might be submitted.
He said the applicant has eliminated access from Eighth Street; the entrance to the
parking area will be on Seventh. He said the basement floor plan of unit two has been
changed; all units are now three -bedroom; the two end units now have rumpus rooms
with wet bars. He said the two 14 x 14 garden areas have been changed; there is
now one garden area that is slightly larger, and less curb cut, with a net gain of
about 500 sq. ft. in open space.
Public hearing opened 7:39 p.m.
Mr. Jack Chernoff, architect, 5274,Wes t Pico, LA 90019, confirmed Mr, MerIIs statements.
He said they have gained more open gardened area on both 8th and Tth;%there will be no
backing into the street; the problem of the middle unit is completely eliminated; there
is no entrance from the lower level exeept from automobiles directly into the units;
and the changes resulted in loss of about i of the planned plant screening on the west
side,
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 24, 1975 Page 2
14 . Ro-bert Beck, applicant, 1004 - 2nd Street,Lsaid they have tried to comply with
Planning Commission requests, he understands the changes and thinks they are an improvement.
Mr. Leon Browning, 2427 Hermosa Avenue, said he owns property at 829 and 838 Seventh
Street and concerned about the height of the proposed building and whether it will
obstruct his ocean view; the setback on Eight; and the type of retaining wall on
the property line. Mr. Merl said the height is 27' (35' allowed); there is an 11,
setback on Eight; and the retaining wall will have to meet specifications of the Building
Dept., and the City Engineer.
Mr. Ray Bock, 835 Eight Street, who opposed the plans at the last meeting, said he
approves of the revised plans and has no further objections.
Public hearing closed 7:46 p.m.
Chmn. Collis said the revised plans appear to meet the intent of the Planning Commission
regarding 8th Street. Comm. Rosenberger concurred.
Motion by Comm. Rosenberger, seconded by Comm. Burt, to approve the application as
revised with conditions as follows:
1. Affidavits be submitted before issuance of Building Permit to establish deed
restrictions of only three units on the property.
2. Submission of final development plan within 6 months or tentative approval will
become void.
3. Utilities, easements, lighting, curbs, gutter, and sidewalds, street improvements
be subject'to review and approval of the City Engineer.
4. That a complete utility plan be submitted and approved by City Engineer prior to
the filing of a final tract or parcel map; and that all utilities be underground.
5. That any public dedications be subject to acceptance by the City Council.
6. That the final development plans and a tentative tract map (meeting the requirements
of the state subdivisions map act) be approved by City Council.
7. That the City Engineer may require reasonable bonds to insure completion of required
improvements.
8. This approval is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
9. Subject to all other applicable state and local laws, ordinances and regulations.
Ayes: Comm. Burt, Learned, Rosenberger, Chmn. Collis
Noes: None
Absent: Comm. Boone, Loosli
Motion by Comm. Rosenberger, seconded by Comm. Burt, to adopt Resolution PC 154-1078,
to approve, based on findings and recommendations of staff, with conditions as stated
in motion above. That the project is consistant with the General Plan.
Ayes: Comm. Burt, Learned, Rosenberger, Chmn. Collis
Noes:q None
Absent: Comm. Boone, Loosli
962 FIRST STREET
Final development plan and tentative tract map for five -unit townhouse condominium;
Cariker & Associates.
Mr. Merl reviewed the project analysis and required guidelines, originally approved
in Resolution P.C. 154-985 on Sept. 5, 1974. He said the final plan is basically
identical; the figures are net. He said the applicant questioned the six-month
provision, pointing out that review by City Attorney was delayed for protion of that
time as the Land Use Element had anot been acted upon at that time, but was later revised.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 24, 1975 Page 3
P�bli ,"hearing opened 7:54 p.m.
Mr. Jim Cariker, 1035 Manhattan Avenue, Hermosa Beach, said that area is now in
high -density apartments and he wishes to set a precedent in proposing 5 rather than 7
units, open space, wider than necessary driveways, mor open patios, planting, good
views, and two rather than three stories. He said it is legally two-story, with
semi -subterranean garages; and one full story lower than the structure next door.
Comm. Rosenberger said he is concerned with the shadow effect on the structure next door
landscaping and architectural treatment of the east side, and parking. Mr. Cariker
said most of the ground floor next door is garages, his third level will be next to
their second floor; he will reconsider the east side; there is no guest parking and
he doesn't think that will be a problem as on -street parking is available.
Chmn. Collis requested consideration of design changes regarding the relation of the
front and west elevations, two windows above the garage, and general concern with
integration of design. Mr. Cariker said he will try to bring it into a unit concept.
Public hearing closed 8:05 p.m.
Motion by Comm. Collis, seconded by Comm. Burt, to approve the final development plan
and tentative tract map#31054 for a five -unit townhouse condominium at 962 First Street,
subject to conditions and recommendations set forth by staff, and the concern with,
the treatment of all elevations to relate to one another.
Ayes: Comm. Burt, Rosenberger, Chmn. Collis
Noes: None
Abstain: Comm. Learned
Absent: Comm. Boone, Loosli
Motion by Chmn. Collis, seconded by Comm. Rosenberger, to adopt Resolution P.C. 154-1079
approving a five -unit townhouse condominium at 962 First Street and as tentative
tract map #31054, in that the proposed development meets the established criteria
and required guidelines as set forth:
REQUIRED GUIDELINES
-1. Land Area
2. Unit/Density.
3. Floor area
4. Unit Size
5. Parking
6. Open Space
7. Recreation
8. Height
Setback
R-3
PROVIDED
5,000 S.F.
3,000 S.F.
676o S.F.
26-40 du/max
45 du/max
32.14 du/ac
125% max. - 8477 S.F.
7730 S.F.
1000 S.F.
900 (2 Br.)
1512 t0 1568
2 per unit
2 off-street
2 per unit
for each unit
35% - 1680 S.F.
200 S. F. per
2033 S.F. Not including
2372 S.F.
unit (1000 S.F.)
balconies (covered areas)
200 S.F. per unit=
N/A
1 unit = 188 S.F.
600 S.F.
4 unit = 280 S.F.
Total + 1388 S.F.
35 max.
35 max.
35
10 min. Su§gested
10 min.
10
subject to conditions as follows:
1. Modification of trash area to seperate unit trash areas located in respective garages.
2. Utilities, easements, lighting, curb, gutter, and sidewalks, street improvements,
to be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
Y 3. That a complete utility plan be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to
the filing of a final tract or parcel map; and that all utilities be underground.
4. That any public dedications be subject to acceptance by the City Council.
5. That the final development plans and a tentative tract map (meeting the requirements
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 24, 1975
Page 4
of the state subdivision map act) be approved by the City Council.
6. That the City Engineer may require reasonable bonds to insure completion of
required improvements.
7. This approval is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
8. Subject to all other applicable state and local laws, ordinances and regulations.
The approval is subject to unification of concept. The proposed deve-lopment falls
within ghe General Plan land use designation, complies with the approved preliminary
development plan per Resolution P.C. 154-985, dated Sept. 5, 1974.
Ayes: Comm. Burt, Rosenberger, Chmn. Collis
Noes: None
Abstain: Comm. Learned
Absent: Comm. Boone, Loosli
CLASSIFICATION OF LOMA DRIVE
Memorandum from Mr. Brown, Building & Safety Director, dated 11-19-75, requesting
interpretation as to whether tandem parking shall be permitted or whether it is
necessary to apply for a variance. Mr. Merl said that Loma Drive is inconsistent in
width, varying from 20' to 40' and 50' in some locations; and 25' to 30' in the
vicinity in question. He said it is the Building Director's position that a decision
has to be based on the width of the street, and since it is 21' or greater, he cannot
allow tandem parking.
Chmn. Collis said he feels the Planning Commission should not establish any precedent
to allow tandem parking on streets or alleys less than the standard 341, as it would
create more problems than already exist. Comm. Rosenberger concurred. Comm. Learned
said in his opinion it would be a variance situation. Comm. Burt said it should not
be designated part alley and part street; since it is designated a street, -tandem
parking should not be approved.
Motion by Comm. Rosenberger, seconded by Comm. Collis, to uphold the interpretation of
the Building Director.
Ayes: Comm. Burt, Learned, Rosenberger, Chmn. Collis
Noes: None
Absent: Comm. Boone, Loosli
AREA 9 PLANNING_ DISTRICT
Mr. Merl reported on the intensive review of Area 9 now in progress and distributed
copies of four maps showing topography, zoning; public service land use, and total
land use. A Commissioners' walk is scheduled for Saturday, Dec. 6, 10:00 a.m.,
meeting in the South School parking area.
STAFF REPORTS
Mr. Merl said the Commercial Element should be ready for distribution by the first
of the week and will be on the agenda for discussion at the next meeting.
COMMISSIONERS" ITEMS
Comm. Rosenberger requested a status report on the Maynard sigh at the next meeting.
Comm. Burt announced that he has submitted his resignation which has been accepted by
City Council, but that he will probably continue to serve unit] the end of them�ifar,
Chmn. Collis thanked Comm. Burt for his service and support on the Planning Cosssion.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 24, 1975 Page 5
Omn—,,'Collis said he would like to have a review by staff of basic development standards.
Mr. Merl said he would place it on the agenda for discussion and would submit suggestions
and tentative revisions. Chmn. Collis said he would also like to have the Zoning and
Development subcommittees reconvened as soon as they have a full commission.
Comm. Learned said it would be very helpful, in reviewing plans, to have a section;
and asked whether the Improvement Commission is aware of the new thermal requirements
which result in considerable change in design.
Comm. Rosenberger suggested keeping statistics on Planning Commission actions for
comparison in making future decisions.
Meeting adjourned 9: 14 p.ra.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes were approved by the City Planning Commission,
City of Hermosa Beach, at a meeting held November 24, 1975.
DATE
i
MICHAEL LEARNED, SECRETARY