Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10/13/87
"You have to be a team player before you can be a star." -Arthur Fonzarelli AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, October 13, 1987 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 6:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR John Cioffi MAYOR PRO TEM Etta Simpson COUNCILMEMBERS Tony DeBellis Jim Rosenberger June Williams CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Norma Goldbach INTERIM CITY MANAGER Gayle T. Martin CITY ATTORNEY James P. Lough All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATIONS: Dental Hygiene Week, October 18 - 24, 1987 White Cane Safety Day, October 15, 1987 Safe Rides Week, October 17 - 22, 1987 Commendation to Richard & Thelma Greenwald ORAL PRESENTATION BY COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION PRESIDENT •SCHMELTZER GEORGE CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) Approval of Minutes: Regular meeting of the City Coun- cil held on September 22, 1987. Recommended Action: To approve minutes. 1 (b) Demands and Warrants: October 13, 1987. Recommended Action: To approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through ������// inclusive. (c) Tentative Future Agenda Items. 'o"�.-� /dK� Recommended Action: To receive and file. (d) City Manager Activity Report: Memorandum from Interim City Manager Gayle T. Martin dated October 7, 1987. Recommended Action: To receive and file. (e) Monthly Investment Report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Norma Goldbach dated October 6, 1987. Recommended Action: To receive and file. (f) Cancellation of Warrants. Memorandum from City Treasurer Norma Goldbach dated September 29, 1987. Recommended Action: To approve cancellation of Warrants No. 023643 and No. 024369. (g) (h) (i) (j) Report and recommendation re. amplified sounds in residential areas. Memorandum from Public Safety Direc- tor Steve Wisniewski dated September 28, 1987. Recommended Action: To receive and file report. Report and recommendation re. the bicycle walk zone on the Strand. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated September 28, 1987. Recommended Action: To receive and file report. Report and recommendations re. the distribution of hand- bills, advertising matters, etc. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated September 23, 1987. Recommended Action: To 1) Instruct staff to prepare a letter to the H. B. Chamber of Commerce requesting as- sistance in advising its membership regarding H.B.M.C. Sec. 3-1, and requesting compliance; and 2) that the Police Department direct its attention to H.B.M.C. Sec. 3-1, (Distribution of Handbills, Advertising Matters, Etc.) and take appropriate action regarding its enforcement. Report and recommendations on the DUI Cost Recovery Pro- gram. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wis- niewski dated October 2, 1987. Recommended Action: Direct staff to prepare an amend- ment to Ordinance 84-762 (Sec. 2-112 HBMC), adding per- centage recovery of costs reasonably borne for Police and Fire emergency response to traffic accidents involv- ing under the influence drivers. (k) List of projects eligible for Proposition A Funds. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 6, 1987. (1) (m) (n) (o) (p) Recommended Action: To receive and file. Award of Bid for the resurfacing of hardwood floors at Clark Building. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 2, 1987. Recommended Action: To award bid to Victor Rodas Floors for resurfacing of approximately 3,040 sq. ft. of hard- wood floor located in Clark Building at 861 Valley Drive. Authorization to seek proposals for leasing various City vehicles and equipment. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 21, 1987. Recommended Action: To 1) authorize staff to seek pro- posals for lease/purchase of (a) one 3 -wheel street sweeper for Public Works Dept., (b) one combination street paint and sign truck for Public Works Dept., (c) one engine analyzer for Public Works Dept., (d) one utility van for Community Resources Dept.; and 2) au- thorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Request for Bids for Pier Grounding (CIP 85-203). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 23, 1987. Recommended Action: Authorize staff to advertise for bids for repair of pier lighting grounding system at the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier, and issue addenda as necessary. Request for Proposals for Cable T.V. Consulting Ser- vices. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated September 30, 1987. Recommended Action: To approve RFP. Contract extension for Hermosa Commuter Bus. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 5, 1987. Recommended Action: To approve a 6 -month contract ex- tension with Community Transit Services, Inc. to operate the Hermosa Commuter Bus. 3 (q) (r) (s) Planning Commission Policy Statement 87-1 - Determina- tion as to what constitutes a restaurant for parking requirement purposes. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 6, 1987. Recommended Action: Confirm the Planning Commission recommended Policy regarding definition of a restaurant for parking purposes. Status report on needed revisions to General Plan Ele- ments other than Land Use. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 6, 1987. Recommended Action: To receive and file. Easy Reader request for City funding of transportation services for the "Mama Liz' Thanksgiving dinner. Memo- randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 6, 1987. Recommended Action: City Council to make a policy determination of whether to fund the requested transpor- tation service as part of the Easy Reader sponsored Fourth Annual "Mama Liz" Thanksgiving dinner. (t) Report from Councilmember Williams on South Bay Corridor Steering Committee meeting of August 27, 1987. Recommended Action: To receive and file. (u) Name That Park Contest. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Alana Mastrian dated October 1, 1987. Recommended Action: Approve the "Name that Park" con- test for the new park located at 4th Street and Prospect Avenue as presented in staff report. (v) Claim for Damages: 1) John Forsyth represented by Dunkerly, Thompson & Anderson, 2276 Torrance_ Blvd., Torrance 90501, filed September 16, 1987. 2) Michael A. Tafoya represented by Movius, Kopczynski & Overgaard, 1025 No. Brand Blvd., Suite 310, Glen- dale 91202, filed October 2, 1987. (w) Recommended Action: To deny claim and refer to City's claims administrator. Acceptance of work as complete, sanitary sewer construc- tion, Tract 44073 located at 446 Monterey Blvd. Memo- randum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 1, 1987. 4 Recommended Action: To a) accept as complete sanitary sewer construction, and 2) authorize release of the Sub- division Improvements Performance Bond and Subdivision Improvements Labor and Materials Bond. (x) Approval of cl ss specification for Communications Dis- patcher. Me.`.\ andum from Personnel Acinistrator Robert Blackwood Recomi... p ed Action: To approve ' i uiunications Dis- he classification. Status report of Conditional Use Permit Enforcement. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 6, 1987. Recommended Action: To receive and file. (z) Sister City Trip. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated October 5, 1987. Recommended Action: To approve the official portion of the Sister City visit scheduled for November 12-16, 1987 (aa) Revision to City Yard Project Description for Hydrocar- bon Recovery Project E.I.R. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 7, 1987. Recommended Action: To 1) direct Public Works Dept. and Planning Dept. to investigate and prepare a report in- cluding any environmental impact on the relocation of the City Yard; 2) modify page 3, paragraph 2, second sentence of Project Description to read "Relocatin of the City Yard will be an addendum to the E.I.R. and will be prepared by City Staff." (bb) Status report re. downzoning between Ardmore Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway on Eighth Place. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 6, 1987. (y) Recommended Action: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. (cc) Request from Easy Reader to conduct three free Concerts on the Beach. Memorandum from Community Resources Di- rector Alana Mastrian dated October 6, 1987. Recommended Action: To approve the Special Event Permit. (dd) Award of Design Contract for first floor Police Depart- ment Remodel including dispatching room (CIP 87-606). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 6, 1987. 5 Recommended Action: To 1) award contract to Joncich, Sturm & Associates in the amount of $14,630 and au- thorize Mayor to sign; and 2) appropriate from the reserve for contingency to CIP 87-606 as follows: $77,500 reserved for RCC on June 23, 1987 and $22,380 additional appropriation. (ee) 'Authorization to re -bid CIP 87-507 - Resurfacing of Kel- ly Courts at Clark Field. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 18, 1987. Recommended Action: To 1) reject all bids received for the project; and 2) readvertise for bids for Kelly Court resurfacing project and issue addenda as necessary. (ff) Informational update re. consideration of alternative hours of operation for city departments. Memorandum from Personnel Administrator Robert Blackwood dated Oc- tober 6, 1987. Recommended Action: To receive and file. CDBG Status Report. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated October 5, 1987. Recommended Action: To exchange the City's remaining CDBG Funds with another city at a rate no less than S.60 on the dollar. (hh) Review of Film Permit Policy. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated October 1, 1987. Recommended Action: To not amend the present film per- mit policy. Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any item listed under Consent Ordinances and Resolutions may do so at this time. MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING: After the City Clerk has read the title to any resolution or or- dinance on tonight's agenda, the further reading thereof be waived, reserving and guaranteeing to each Councilmember the right to demand the reading of any such resolution or ordinance in regular order. 2. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS /(a) ORDINANCE NO. 87- - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW SECTION 2-4.1 ENTITLED "REGULATIONS GOVERNING EMPLOYEE 6 INSURANCE PROVISIONS. For waiver of further reading and adoption. (b) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. N.S. 2435, AS AMENDED BY ADDING THERETO A TWENTY MINUTE PARKING RESTRICTION ON A CERTAIN SECTION OF SECOND STREET AS HEREIN SET FORTH. For adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 5, 1987. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. THIRD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS - NW AREAS I THROUGH XI. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 5, 1987. Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any of the remaining items on the agenda may request to do so at the time the item is called. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT, HIGHLAND AVENUE WIDENING (CIP 85-102) AND GOULD/VALLEY/ARDMORE INTERSECTION IMPROVE- MENTS (CIP 85-137). Memorandum from Public Works Direc- tor Anthony Antich dated October 2, 1987. Recommended Action: To 1) accept the preliminary design report; 2) authorize completion of plans and specifica- tions for Highland Avenue; and 3) authorize completion of plans and specifications using Alternative No. 1 for Valley/Gould/Ardmore. STATUS REPORT AND EXTENSION OF INTERIM RECYCLING OR- DINANCE. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 6, 1987. Recommended Action: To adopt interim ordinance permit- ting recycling facilities, and direct Staff to set for public hearing an extension to the ordinance for the October 27, 1987 meeting. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Resolution of tie vote if one were to occur at General Municipal Election November 3, 1987. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated October 2, 1987. Recommended Action: City Council to make policy deci- sion to resolve a tie vote either by: 1) Lot (tossing coin, etc.), or 2) a special runoff election. (b) Oral report re. status of ATSF right-of-way. 10. OTHER MAILERS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Other Matters - City Council, Future Agenda Items. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated Oc- tober 2, 1987. Recommended Action: City Council to make a policy deci- sion regarding the inclusion under "Other Matters City Council" of an item entitled "Requests from Councilmem- bers for Possible Future Agenda Items," 11. MEETING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH PARKING AUTHORITY. (a) CONSENT CALENDAR 1) Approval of minutes of August 11, 1987 meeting. (b) Additional public parking on former Pier Avenue School property. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated October 6, 1987. APPEARANCE OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any matter within the jurisdiction of the Council not elsewhere considered on the agenda may do so at this time. Citizens with complaints regard- ing City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those complaints in writing to the City Manager. ADJOURNMENT 8 Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often • CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by vi.s.itor/users; . led by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers" 1 THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business district. October 6, 1987 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL October 13, 1987 EASY READER REQUEST FOR CITY FUNDING OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR THE "MAMA LIZ THANKSGIVING DINNER" RECONNENDATION It is recommended that the City Council make a policy determination of whether to fund the requested transportation service as part of the Easy Reader sponsored Fourth Annual "Mama Liz Thanksgiving Dinner". BACKGROUND On September 23, 1986, City Council approved funds to operate a dial -a -ride vehicle for last years thanksgiving dinner. ANALYSIS Last year, the City used it's transit contractor to provide service for this event. The same procedure will be used this year. The cost per hour is -$-2-00- to total an estimated figure of $176.00 for the event.`-� ^„� //;?_/ Monies are not budgeted for this event. It would require a transfer from Prospective Expenditures to the appropriate transit account. The attached resolution was prepared by the City Attorney last year. Since,there are no significant changes to this event, Staff is submitting the same resolution. CONCUR: Michael`Schubach anning Dire or Gay T. Martin IntrimCity Manager 1 Resp tfully submitted, sa B `'cher Planning Aide NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Vicki Copeland Finance Administrator is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 87-�Q % 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AWARD FOR CONDUCT BENEFICIAL TO THE PUBLIC TO THE EASY READER FOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TO A THANKSGIVING DINNER EVENT. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach realizes that members of the public, employees of the City of Hermosa Beach and others often engage in services which are of benefit to the public at large; and WHEREAS, the provision of services to the public should be recognized by those who benefit from such public services, including recognition from the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach and the City of Hermosa Beach where such public services are of benefit to the citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach realizes that the recognition of persons who spend time and effort engaging in services which are of benefit to the public at large will encourage others to engage in public services; and WHEREAS, the City Council has the ability to make awards, pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2-6.3, to persons who make demonstrated contributions to the public at large through public employment, volunteer work, public service or other contributions; and WHEREAS, such an award shall reflect the contribution made by the individual or entity but shall not be intended to compensate the individual or entity in questions; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach finds the presentation of such an award compatible with the goals and 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 purposes of the laws and constitutional provisions of the State of California; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby recognize the Easy Reader for its contribution to the welfare of the City of Hermosa Beach through its "Thanksgiving Dinner Event." Section 2. That the City Council does hereby grant the services of the City transit system for the aforementioned event in appreciation to the Easy Reader. Section 3. That the expenditures resulting from services provided by the City transit system be incurred by the City of Hermosa Beach in recognition for the service provided by the Easy Reader to the citizens of the City of Hermosa Beach. Section 4. Such award shall be for true and actual expenses not to exceed three hundred dollars ($300.00). Section 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THIS DAY OF 1987. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED 0 FORM: ATTORNE 27 28 2 PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MINUTES„OF,THF,REGULAR,MEETING QF„THE..CITY._COHNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, September 22, 1987 at the hour of 8:05 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - 6:05 p..m. ROLL cAkit Present - DeBellis, Rosenberger, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Cioffi Absent - None PLEDGE OF„ALLEG>✓ANCE - Councilmember Tony DeBellis ROLL CALL Present - DeBellis, Rosenberger, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Cioffi Absent - None ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED_SESSI04 September,8,_1957 - Council approved Merit Performance Pay of 7.5% for City Manager Gregory T. Meyer for the last six months of Mr. Meyer's tenure as City Manager. September,22 _1987 - Approved a meeting between Mayor Cioffi, Mayor Pro Tem Simpson and Br7an Welder representing AT&SF to dis- cuss the purchase of the AT&SF Railroad right-of-way. RESOLUTION.OF THE CITY CQUNCIL.APPOINTING GAYLE.T. MARTIN, TO THE POSITION QF INT ERIM CITY MANAGER, Action: To adopt Resolution No. 87-5076 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING MR. GAYLE T. MARTIN AS INTERIM CITY MANAGER.” Motion DeBellis, second Simpson. So ordered. CITIZEN COMMENTS None 1. CONSENT_QALENDAR ActjQn; To approve Consent Calendar items (a) through (z) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for further discussion but are listed in order for clarity, and noting corrections to item la, page 2, line 5 to read 122 Diaz and page 3, item (k) action to read $19,825 rather than $419,825: (a) Williams, (c) Williams, (e) Williams, (j) Williams, (k) Williams, (r) Rosenberger, (t) Williams, (u) Staff, (v) DeBellis and (y) DeBellis. Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. So ordered. - 1 Minutes 9-22-87 (a) Approval_ofMinutes: Regular meeting of the City Coun- cil held on September 8, 1987. Action: To approve minutes as amended. Motion Rosenberger, second Williams. So ordered. (b) Demand* ,.and ,Warrants: September 22, 1987. Action: To approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 24253 through 24257 and 24259 through 24393 inclusive noting voided Warrants Nos. 24259, 24260 and 24315. (0) Tentatiye,_Future.Agenda.Items. Action: To regularly schedule a report on AT&SF on each City Council agenda and receive and file report. Motion Rosenberger, second Mayor Cioffi. So ordered. (d) $uildin: and.Safet ._De•artment_Monthl Activit .Re•o t: August, 19:7. Motion: To receive and file. (e) Community.,Resources;Department,Monthly.,Aetivity Report: August, 1987. (f) Action: To receive and file. Motion Rosenberger, second Williams. So ordered. Finance Department. c thly_ActivitY_Report: 1987. August, Action: To receive and file. (g) F'ire.Department,MQnthly_Activity_Report: August, 1987. 4letion: To receive and file. (h) General ._ServircesDe•a tment_Month1 Activit .,Re'•r August, 19:7. Actidn: To receive and file. Personnel Department,Monthl_ActivitAAReport: August, X9$7 Acton: To receive and file. (j) Plannin:D-•artmentMont .Activit 'e•or 19:7. . August, Councilmember Williams, commended Planning Aide Lisa Breisacher for her excellent presentations before the South Bay Cities Steering Committee, transit coordina- tors for the South Bay. - 2 - Minutes 9-22-87 Action: To receive and file. Motion Williams, second Simpson. So ordered. (k) Police De•artmentMonth' Activit Report: August, 19:7. Councilmember Williams commended the Police Department on the statistics in the activity report. Action: To receive and file. Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (1) Public .Works _0 gust, 19:7. artment.Month etivity.Re•Ort: Au - Action: To receive and file. (m) Monthly,Revenue._Report: August, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (n) Monthly„Expenditure Report: August, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (o) City._Treasurer's„Report: August, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (p) Request: for,.Closed,Session. Memorandum from Acting City Manager Alana Mastrian dated September 11, 1987. Action: To calendar a Closed Session for October 13, 1987 at 6:00 p.m. (q) Request for reap�ropriation._pf .funds _tQ,,purchase Em- -ployee,.Seryiec Pips. Memorandum from Personnel Ad- ministrator Robert Blackwood dated September 13, 1987. Action: To appropriate $2,300 from the General Fund to Personnel Department Contract Services -Private, for pur- chase of Employee Service Award Pins. (r) • Status..report,,-reg, pch47QJ operties. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated September 15, 1987. Actign; To have the City Clerk contact the Hermosa Beach City Elementary School District by letter and as- certain the dollar amount spent by the district on the subject litigation, and request that all interested citizens seek the same information. Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson. So ordered Fanal,_Action: To receive and file. Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson. So ordered. - 3 - Minutes 9-22-87 (s) CIE,86-402.Sanitary Sewer,Status.Report. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated Septem- ber 16, 1987. Action: Receive and file. (t) Status. repo, 't,.Qn Jra lroad-right-of-WaY ,E..I,E, Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated Sep- tember 11, 1987. Action: To receive and file report. Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (u) Timetable _ for . hydrocarbon_. recovery., prQJeet E. I ._RL .. re a- ration at .Cit ..Yard ,and._South _School_Si.tes. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 16, 1987. Planning Director Schubach advised Council that the consultants had requested that the Project Description be placed on the next City Council agenda, specifically the City Yard relocation. Action: To receive and file report. Motion Rosenberger, second Williams. So ordered. (v) Authorization,.for.City.. to. red ly., forL.CDBG .program funds. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Alana Mastrian dated September 11, 1987. Action: To receive and file. Motion DeBellis, second Simpson. So ordered noting a NO vote by Williams. (w) Cit y's_.celebration of,the._U...5. _Constitution. Memoran- dum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated September 10, 1987. Actio,: To approve the City's official celebration of the U. S. Constitution on September 26, 1987 as part of the City's 80th Birthday celebration and direct the Department of Community Resources to develop the program and implement. (x) Award. of Bid . for purchase, o f _ four., three -wheeled v,ehiicles ?ndione.deliveryyehiele�tQ,Toro,.Pacific,.Equipment. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dat- ed September 9, 1987. Action: To accept the low bid of $35,481.72 submitted by Toro Pacific Equipment, for the purchase of 4 three - wheeled vehicles and 1 delivery vehicle. (y) Definin:the need for Environmental Review .riorto_is- suance.of.a-building.permit. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 14, 1987. 4 Minutes 9-22-87 Action: Direct the Planning Department to study developing City of Hermosa Beach design standards and reivew process. Motion DeBellis, second Simpson. So ordered. (z) Stat S re ort re... :relimpar en;ineerin: port -. CI 5.-102 and CIP :5-137,:GQuId/Val le y,Ardmore.interee- tion. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 16, 1987. Action: To receive and file report and continue action on this item until the October 13, 1987 meeting. ITIXENS:. WISHING, TO,.ADDRESS: THE CITY„ COUNCIL..0N.,ANT. .ITEM _ LISTED VNO 1L CQNSENT ..QRDINANCES,. AND RESQLUTIQNS Wilma Burt, 1152 - 7th Street - asked to speak to 2 (c). Wally Moore, President, Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Assn. - asked to speak to 2 (c). 2. ORDINANCES., AND . RESOLUTIONS (a) QRDINANCE_NO. _ 87-903 AILORDINANCE` _QF., TIJ CITY _ CQUNCIL QF._THE_CITY QE..I ERMOSA..BEACH, , CALIFORNIA, ..AMENDING,_CHAP- TEI7 _?1. _OFFENSES __MISCELLANEOUS. BY. ADDING..THERETQ„SUB- SECTION,21-23. TQ . THE. HERMO A . BEACH. MUNICIPAL. CODE REG- W. ATH G._THE,,POSTI.NG. OFyFET_ . COHQL .SYNDROME._WARNING SIGNS. For waiver of further reading and adoption. ctio.• To waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 7-903 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 21 - OFFENSES MISCELLANEOUS - BY ADDING THERETO SUBSEC- TION 21-23 TO THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, REGULAT- ING THE POSTING OF FETAL ALCOHOL SYNDROME WARNING SIGNS.” Motion Williams, second Rosenberger AYES - DeBellis, Rosenberger, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Cioffi NOES - None (b) ORDINANCE_.N�O1 87-905...-. AN..ORDINANCE,.OF_TUE..CITY._COIJNCIi, QF..THE.CITY QF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA APPROVING„A TEXT AMENDMEN TO _ T'HE ZONING„ORDINANCE , TO. DD.,VIDEO SALRS AND .REN -_ALS . EXCEPT..'!X"._RATED V DEQS IN THE C-1 ZONE, ,.NI~NEIGHBORHOOD. COMMERCIAL,..AND.,,APPROVING.AN„ENVIRON- FN MTA GATVE.�DECLARA ION. For waiver of further reading and adoption. Aotionl; To waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 87-905 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS, EXCEPT "X” RATED VIDEOS, IN THE C-1 ZONE, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION.” - 5 - Minutes 9-22-87 Motion Simpson, second Rosenberger AYES - DeBellis, Rosenberger, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Cioffi NOES - None (c) ORDINANCE _ NQ_, .. $7.-99.: AN..ORDINANCE QF .THE CITE[_, CQ[�NCIL QF_ THE C TX..OF,_HEItMQSA,.BEACH ....CALI .QRNI AMENDING ARTI- CLE II. _CI L_SERVICE. BY ADDING _SEC .ION ..2-4•,,.ENTITL 7REGV ATIQNS GOVERNING.,.EMPLQYEE,INSURANCE_FRQVISIQNS," For waiver of further reading and adoption. Speaking to the adoption of this ordinance were: Wilma Burt, 1152 - 7th Street - objecting to any change to N.S. 211, Civil Service Ordinance, without a vote Of the people. Wally Moore, President of the Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association - objected to passage of this ordinance. Ac_ ion- To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 87- 90 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ARTICLE III, CIVIL SERVICE, BY ADDING SECTION 2-46 ENTITLED "REGULA- TIONS GOVERNING EMPLOYEE INSURANCE PROVISIONS" with an amendment deleting "Article III, Civil Service, by add- ing Section 2-46" from the title and on page 1, line 13. Motion Williams, second Rosenberger AYES - DeBellis, Rosenberger, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Cioffi NOES - None Further_Aetior} To reintroduce Ordinance No. 87-906. Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson AYES - Rosenberger, Simpson, Mayor Cioffi NOES - DeBellis, Williams Fr}RI A0tion; To direct staff to prepare an ordinance to cause a penalty to be imposed for submitting false statements or documents to the City. Motion DeBellis, second Simpson. So ordered. (d) AN .ORDINANCEQFTIE CITY OF NERMQSA, BEA CB,.__CALIFQItNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH., MUNICIPAL .CQDE._BYAD'ING TQ ARTICLE.IV CHAPTER._19 "MOTOR.VEHICL S AN DIVI$IQN 5 ,"RECREATISN VEHICLES".AND. RE AT P. EC- ,TQNS. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dat- ed August 31, 1987. D . RAFFIC" Action; To send back to staff for further consideration. Motion Mayor Cioffi, second Rosenberger. So ordered. - 6 - Minutes 9-22-87 (e) A _RESQLUTION OF .THE..CITX .COUNCIL. OF THE _CITY .,Of . HERMQSA BEAC1�., CALIFORNIA, ,ADOPTING..C�UIDELINES...FQR. CROSS GUARDS. For adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 9, 1987. Action; To send back to staff for further consideration. Motion Mayor Cioffi, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 3. ITEMS., REMOVED FRAM. THE . CQNSEr• LENDAR „FOR ,EPAR.ATE DI$CUSSZQN. The following Consent Calendar items were heard at this time but are listed in order on the Consent Calendar for clarity: (a), (c), (e), (j), (k), (r), (t), (u), (v) and (y). 4. WRITTEN CQMMUNICATIQ!1S.,FROM THS PUBIIC. (a) Letterfr•m• James•,X,�.Re noi0* .44' ,Hollowell Avenue HerM4P@:$each, dated August 21, 19:7 requesting an or- dinance prohibiting feeding of pigeons on public lands and grounds. Action:, To receive public testimony limited to two mi- nutes each. Motion DeBellis, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Speaking to Council regarding this issue were: James Reynolds, 449 Hollowell Avenue - asked Council for an ordinance to stop feeding of the pigeons. Wilma Burt, 1152 - 7th Street - against allowing feeding of the pigeons. Norm , 460 Gentry Street - asked for help in alleviating the problem of the pigeons. Paul Bratti, 348 Hollowell - he feeds the pigeons - now only feeds them once a week at the direction of Los Angeles County. Gary Frost, Coast Drugs, 58 Pier Avenue - suggested letting the pigeons take care of themselves - become too tame with feeding. Action: To direct staff to prepare,a staff report regarding this matter indicating alternative solutions. Motion Simpson, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (b) Letter_ from Doroth . FeinOei 66. - . 9t Street . Bermosa Beech, dated September , 19:7 requesting action to pro- hibit bands in residential areas. PrQposed.Action: To refer to staff for report back to Council. Motion DeBellis - dies for lack of a second. 7 - Minutes 9-22-87 AgtiQn. To direct the City Manager to prepare a letter to Mrs. Feindel for the Mayor's signature explaining the City's codes. Motion DeBellis, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Final,Actim_ To direct staff to return with a proposed ordinance banning amplification. Motion Williams, second DeBellis. So ordered. (c) Letter_fr9m_rR9ger .,Creighton, received , SePtemker,, 14, -19$7, re. ordinance on campaign limitations and City Seal use. Supplemental information - attachment to letter. Action: To receive and file. Motion Simpson, second DeBellis. So ordered. (d) tter, frc?r_Wency_D9eh,,,:649._G4u1dTerrace,,_:.Hermosa Beach., dated September 10, 1987 re. request to ban leaf blowers. Action: , -To refer to staff for report back to Council on October:8/and the City Manager to communicate with Ms. Doeh regarding Council action and status. Motion DeBellis, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (e) Let,terafr.om- 401,.Lissner,__2715.R1Aos9 .Prive,,,.Bermosa Beach, dated September 9, 1-987 re. leaf blower ordinance amendments needed. Aetion:,,✓To refer to staff for report back to Council on October. and the City Manager to communicate with Mr. Lissner regarding Council action and status. Motion DeBellis, second Rosenberger. So ordered. PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE MUNICIP$L„MATTERS 5. RRCOMMENDATIQNS.�tE.,-RESPQNSIBILITIRS.AND.UUTIES,_OR,.CA$LF T,1",_B0131). Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated September 9, 1987. The staff report was presented by General Services Di- rector Joan Noon. Action;. To approve the guidelines and responsibilities and duties for the Cable TV Board. Motion Rosenberger, second DeBellis. So ordered. - 8 - Minutes 9-22-87 6. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY.._ MANAGER (a) City. Manager. Activity,Report. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Gayle T. Martin dated September 17, 1987. Action:. To receive and file report. Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 7. MISCELLANEOUS .ITEMS_AND. REPORTS..- CITY CQUNCIL (a) Discussion,re,,,meeting_wth.,ATSF_officials. (b) City Attorney Lough advised that in closed session, the City Council voted to send a delegation of two, Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem, -to meet with Brian Weber, Real Estate Development Department of AT&SF, regarding the possible purchase of the railroad right-of-way, such meeting to take place without attorneys being present. Report_as.re•nested.b'_Couneimember.Rosenber:erre. avai.lab2lity._of,.lot..on ,i_th. Stf rte. Memorandum from Acting City Manager Alana Mastrian dated September 11, 1987. Action; Staff to bring back a_report regarding the use of the 14th Street lot parking for adjacent residents, combining of lots with adjacent piece of property and striping and metering of the -lot. Motion Rosenberger, second DeBellis. So ordered. (c) City,_CQuncil position.on„M.C,R. _.1.7,9._r quested .by .Mayor Pro,Tem,Simpson. Memorandum from Acting City Manager Alana Mastrian dated September 11, 1987. Action; To support House Concurrent Resolution 179 regarding long-range energy planning of the United States and ask for a progress report. Motion -Simpson, second DeBellis (discussion). So Ordered noting a NO vote by Williams. (d) Discusson_requestedby_Councilm.mber DeBellis concern- ng._eminentdomain action to,_ac.uire. •ar land for street •ur•oses s cificall rovementofPier Valley/Ardmore. Aetipni To have staff do a design study to improve Pier/Valley/Ardmore, look at procedures for eminent do- main action, research funding sources, and report back to Council the second meeting in October (October 27, 1987). Motion DeBellis, second Simpson. So ordered. - 9 - Minutes 9-22-87 8. OTUER MATTERS. -..CITY COUNCIL (a) Vacancies- Boards, and. Commissions Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated Sep- tember 11, 1987. Supplemental information - memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubaeh dated September 22, 1987. Pr Qpgsed.,.Aeti9n. To set up an interview procedure for Planning Commissioners and set interviews for Saturday, October 10, 1987. Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. AYES - Rosenberger, Williams NOES - DeBellis, Simpson, Mayor Cioffi Motion fails Actk90,; To open nominations for candidates. Motion Simpson, second Mayor Cioffi. So ordered noting NO votes by Rosenberger and Williams who both stated they would also abstain from voting. Piaroing,Commission - One unexpired 4 -year term ending June 30, 1991 Nominations - Simpson - Scott Ingell Vote - Simpson - Ingell DeBellis - Ingell Cioffi - Ingell Rosenberger - abstained Williams - abstained Scott Ingell was appointed to serve as Planning Commissioner for one unexpired 4 -year term ending June 30, 1991. Proposed Action: When other openings occur on the Plan- ning Commission, set up an interview procedure for open session. Motion Williams, second Rosenberger AYES - Rosenberger, Williams NOES - DeBellis, Simpson, Mayor Cioffi Motion fails. For the record, Councilmember Williams stated that his- torically interviewing of potential Planning Commis- sioners has been done, and she feels there is a need for commissioners with expertise. (b) UeBeiiis..-..Campaign.LimitatiQgs - stated he did not feel these limitations applied to City Council - City Clerk Midstokke advised him of the code sections stating the limitation does apply when the City Council sits as a non -elective body such as Parking Authority, VPD, etc. - 10 - Minutes 9-22-87 (c) R9sent?er cry,- ,Fi1m;14g.,.P91Qy - stated there were no time restrictions for filming and felt there was a need for rules regarding time restrictions and enforcement - asked to have staff report back on October 13 with a revised policy and enforcement procedures. (d) Rose0berggr .Down;Qning, East. of..Ardm9r9, ..5th. -..9th Streets - need report regarding status - report to be back on October 8, 1987. (e) Wil.lt0M§.,7Gtf - 91,7_14retQAistPr-Pity Visit - asked Mayor Cioffi to take under consideration. (f) Williams.,. -,Strand Safety- asked staff to report back with an evaluation of what happened on the Strand this summer - report back at next meeting. (g) iiia.i4msrHrm94_,Deaeh_P_,srking.w.A_,I4?4gement,.Plao - staff to report back with review cycle, goals es- tablished and achieved, etc. (h) Willlams --QratQriPM_re,Z ??ing,and,GePerai.Planx,- City Manager to bring back brief report regarding understand- ing of the situation (does it include all the con- straints of the lower zone). (i) W1111,4m*__fly9rs,rcm,winosY}folds - stated need for an ordinance against flyers and enforcement - City Manager to prepare a staff report (advised that such an or- dinance is in effect). (j) Mill ,4mp,-,prpnkei_Ariyers - asked to have bills sent to drunk drivers (advised that such an ordinance was passed in 1985). Public Safety Director to report back. (k) _ Cioffi,_->fierm9s4-Se40..SlrtbeY Ce ebrati94 - announced schedule for celebration - Saturday, September 26 - Pan- cake Breakfast at Rotary/Kiwanis buildings 7:30-10:00 A.M., parade to start at Valley Park at 10:00 A.M. to the Community Center - invited all citizens to participate. APPEARANCE OF,.INTRRSTED CITINS None. Action; To adjourn to a Closed Executive Session on Tuesday, September 22, 1987 at the hour of 11:05 P.M., under Government Code Section 54956 to discuss potential purchase of the railroad right-of-way from AT&SF. Motion Cioffi, second Simpson. So ordered noting NO vote by DeBellis. The meeting reconvened at the hour of 11:25 P.M. No actions were reported from Closed Session. Minutes 9-22-87 ID4QURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, September 22, 1987 at the hour of 11:25 P.M. to a Special Meeting to be held on Saturday, October 10, 1987 at 9:00 A.M. for the purpose of holding a Closed Execu- tive Session for discussion of potential litigation and potential purchase of the railroad right-of-way from AT&SF. Deputy City Clerk - 12 - Minutes 9-22-87 fa September 28, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council City Council Meeting of October 13, 1987 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING AMPLIFIED SOUNDS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND: Dorothy Feindell of #66 19th Street wrote a letter to City Council requesting action to prohibit bands in residential areas. At the City Council meeting of September 22nd, Councilmember Williams requested a report and recommendation of possible ordinance banning amplification of music. or speech in a residential zones. ANALYSIS: There are currently adequate ordinances in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to address the problem of amplified sound in residential areas of the City. Article V, Sections 19i-14 thru 19t-22 deal specifically with amplified sound and establish procedures for approval of permits and appeals for denial of such permits. This section of the Municipal Code makes it unlawful for anyone to operate amplification equipment anywhere in the City without a permit. Several permits have been issued under this section to various groups and individuals in the City. Such permits have been issued to Hope Chapel for amplification of several of their events and to several private citizens for parties that were held in their homes or yards. A citizens group representing 19th Street homeowners recently visited with the Director of Public Safety to voice their complaints and concerns regarding permits for amplified sound in their neighborhood. They would like to see more restrictions placed on issuance of permits. It is our feeling that we have appropriate means to deal with any problems which may arise from amplified music without a permit in a residential area. Addtionally, there is a study of noise being conducted in the City in order to rewrite the current noise regulations of the Municipal Code. This study is nearing completion and we hope to have recommended revisions this year. 1 fa We feel that a complete ban on any amplified sound in a residential area would be too restrictive and that each case should be considered on an individual basis. The Chief of Police/Director of Public Safety may disapprove a permit for several reasons. Among them, that it would interfere with the peace and quiet of the neighborhood. Disapprovals may be appealed to the City Council for futher consideration. We think that this issue can be handled by looking at each application with close scrutiny and agressive enforcement on violators without permits. OTED: GaylejT. Martin, Interim City Manager 2 Steve S. Wisniewski Director of Public Safety September 28, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council City Council Meeting of October 13, 1987 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE BICYCLE WALK ZONE ON THE STRAND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND: On April 28, 1987, City Council enacted Ordinances to regulate bicycle and skateboard traffic in congested areas of the Strand. A bike and skateboard "walk zone" was designated between 10th and 15th streets on the Strand. This "walk zone" is enforced when the flashing yellow lights are in operation. The equipment installation and signage of the area was completed the first week in May 1987 and the "walk zone" was placed into operation. In conjunction with this, the Police Department conducted a widespread educational program aimed at gaining voluntary compliance of the new ordinances. At the City Council meeting of September 22nd, Councilmember Williams requested a report on the "walk zone" since its installation. ANALYSIS: Since placing the "walk zone" into operation, we have witnessed a high level of voluntary compliance with the regulations. The zone has been well accepted by the citizens using the Strand and there have been numerous favorable comments regarding its effectiveness and purpose. We have had several suggestions offered for improvement of the zone, and are working to implement several of them. These include installation of additional lights in the area and on the back of the original lights. These lights were ordered several weeks ago and should arrive soon and the Public Works Department will install them. There have been several occassions when the lights could not be turned on because of foreign materials being jammed into the key slots. This problem will_ be solved when the remote on/off switch is operable. There has been a minor delay with the phone company but we expect the completion of the project soon. In summation, it appears that the "walk zone" is having the desired effect, compliance is high and it is well received by users of the Strand. We will monitor and work to improve the zone on a continual basis. OTED: Steve S. Wisniewski Director of Public Safety lh September 23, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 13, 1987 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THE DISTRIBUTION OF HANDBILLS, ADVERTISING MATTERS, ETC. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Instruct staff to prepare a letter to the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce requesting assistance in advising its membership regarding H.B.M.C. Sec. 3-1, and requesting compliance. 2. It is recommended that the Police Department direct its attention to H.B.M.C. Sec. 3-1, (Distribution of Hand- bills, Advertising Matters, Etc.) and take appropriate action regarding its enforcement. BACKGROUND Staff was directed to prepare a report and make recommendations regarding the "flyers and pamphlets" problem reported by Councilmember Williams. ANALYSIS This is an issue that periodically becomes a problem which generates complaints from the public. Pamphlets, brochures & flyers which are placed on automobiles, doors & mailboxes can become litter problems. Those which are left on door knobs can become a crime prevention concern and those which are not removed from auto windshields become Vehicle Code issues when that vehicle becomes mobile. Due to these and other concerns the Hermosa Beach City Council enacted Sec. 3-1 of its Municipal Code thereby regulating these types of activities. COMM: STEVE WISNIEWSKI ?UBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR AYI,.t T. MARTIN INTE IM CITY MANAGER spec fu bmitted, N J. MEBI S, CIkPTAIN OP RATIONS DIVISION HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT �I October 2, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 13, 1987 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE (DUI COST RECOVERY PROGRAM) RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Direct staff to prepare an amendment to Ordinance 84-762 (Sec. 2-112 HBMC). Adding percentage recovery of costs reasonable borne for Police and Fire emergency response to traffic accidents involving under the influence drivers. BACKGROUND In 1987, the State of California amended Government Code Section 53150 regarding the recovery of costs resulting from traffic accidents involving persons driving under the influence. The section reads as follows: "Any person under the influence of alcohol or a drug or a combination, whose negligent operation of a motor vehicle, boat, or aircraft, while intoxicated causes an accident which results in an emergency response by a public agency, is liable for up to #1,000 per incident." The procedure would involve billing DUI drivers by invoice from the Finance Department. The drivers would be billed for materials and Officers time spent investigating the accident and processing the arrest. ANALYSIS: This amendment to the ordinance will allow the City to recover costs reasonable borne for this service. Prior to the introduction of the proposed amendment appropriate fees and charges will be determined upon an analysis of the intent of the legislation. CONN UR r S VE JWISNITWSKI 7BLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR GAYL T. MA TIN INT RIM CITY MANAGER ly submitt HN J. ME:IUS, CAPTAIN OPERATIONS DIVISION HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 1i October 6, 1987 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL October 13, 1987 LIST OF PROJECTS ELIGIBLE FOR PROPOSITION A FUNDS RECOMMENDATION To receive and file. BACKGROUND 1 At the June 23, 1987, City Council meeting, a list of permitted' projects eligible for Proposition A funds was requested. ANALYSIS The following ',projectsare eligible for Proposition A, funds: %, st ' •1. ) '.iXe�'dr 4�;oute' {' Transit) ) - 4er ice ( ncluo�i�ng,�'< Commuter I ii S e ry i'lc'e s ) i ,'. ,9, ', 1 1 ) ', , ) , r. ' 2.: General Public Paratransit Service (i.e. ' Di a1 -a -Ride Services). '. 3. Special Service Paratransit for Elderly and/or Disabled. 4. Recreational or Special Event Transit Services. 5. On -board Transit Security. 6. Transit Station Security. 7. Subsidized Taxi Services. 8. Subsidy Programs for Regional Transit Services. 9. Rideshariqg Programs (i.e. vanpool & carpool arrangements). 10. Transportation Planning (subject to approval by LACTC). 11. Bus Stop Improvement Programs (i.e. bus benches, signs, amenities, etc.). 12. Vehicle Purchase Program for City Operated Transit Services. 13. Bus Lane 'Modification Program (i.e. concrete in the street atthe bus stop only). .14. Park -and -Ride Lot Program (exclusive ;transit or ridesharing use only). j ,15., Transit Facility Improvements (including a modification s'. orconstruction project) . , 1 '16: Right -of -Way Aquisition Program. rt All'; these . • projects'. ,are permitted'r, by.,. the . Los '.Angeles, Trans,iortat ion.-''Commiss`ion: Any other.;,' proposed, ' pro jcts ,have.; to' be reviewed for consideration by,'the'Commission. ,' s. CUR: ichael Schubach Planning Q r-ctor ( LI. 4, GTTay-1 - T.!('`�M}arrtTiinT�9 T i�l'yki K;lvA. St Y)'IJIJf:Aifj431t �. ri ��....1 tC�`}f1�1H J`. r.3Z ia,p age x•• s�.rl„�.�ilr3'r9r3,1 %: '�'��.M1 .�r.�>;5�e�*,1� n.�1 'Air`�nv t;n�9+f �1h�D,;�11�,t{1�5 �9R,)&Fiv✓`rAn•b„pl�biirf%\�l:�f�N'Y��x jd:j?Pr ��,••�1i SJ }i��s t;'y J''. �'i�b J. r.1. t, espe fulY Submitted, isa Brei cher Planning Aide 1k - 4111 - October 2, 1987 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of Regular Meeting of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL October 13, 1987 AWARD OF BID FOR THE RESURFACING OF HARDWOOD FLOORS AT CLARK BUILDING Recommendation It is recommended that City Council: Award the bid to Victor Rodas Wood Floors for the resurfacing of approximately 3,040 square feet of hardwood floor located in Clark Building at 861 Valley Drive. Background The hardwood floor at the Clark Building is in need of resurfacing. This concern was prompted by complaints from users of the facility. The floor was last resurfaced in 1982. The proposed work will include resurfacing of approximately 3,040 square feet of hardwood floor. All hardwood areas excluding the two back room are scheduled for resurfacing. Prior to going to formal bid the City received three written quotations - all in excess of $5,000. Hence, a notice inviting bids was prepared (as required by Section 2-57 (b) of the Municipal Code) and was published for ten days in the Easy Reader prior to bid opening. Analysis One sealed bid was received, publicly opened and read aloud by the City Clerk on September 28, 1987. Victor Rodas Wood Floors was the low bidder at a total cost of $5,939.70. His sealed bid is the same dollar amount as the written quotation he earlier provided the Department. The two other contractors that provided quotations did not provide sealed bids. Their prices were higher and for comparison purposes only are listed below: Bidder Cost 1. Jim Lang $7,156.00 2. A Touch of Carpet - $7,458.00 References contacted praised the work of Victor Rodas Wood Floors. The City Business License and Contractor's State License is current. Staff has determined Victor Rodas Wood Floors to be a responsible and lowest bidder, and recommends that the resurfacing work be awarded to Victor Rodas Wood Floors. 1 11 FISCAL IMPACT This project was not budgeted but can be paid for from CIP 86-604. Hence no additional funding is necessary. Alternatives Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Direct staff to re -bid the resurfacing work. 2. Drop the project. Ressectfu ly submitted: • L/1n Bubenas A•sinistrative Aide NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Attachments: Notice Inviting Bids Bid Form 2 CO Anth:ny Antich Director of P is Works 'Gayle j Martin Interii City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH State of California NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS The Public Works Department is requesting bids for the resurfacing of approximately 3,040 square feet of hardwood floor •-located in Clark Building at 861 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, `'California 90254. SEALED PROPOSALS will be received at the office of the City Clerk, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254, until Monday, September 28, 1987.at 11:00 a.m. at which time they will be publicly opened and read, for performing work as follows: Job Requirement: 1. Sand, minor repair and refinish all hardwood floors, including stage and step. Excludes two back rooms. 2. Finish with up to three coats of moisture cured polyurethane natural, high gloss, no wax product. 3. All work to be completed within seven (7) calendar days. NOTE TO ALL BIDDING CONTRACTORS: All contractors proposing to bid on this project shall go on a field visit with a Public Works Department representative prior to bidding. Bids shall be enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to the City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach, California 90254, and shall be identified on the lower left corner of the envelope: "SEALED BID - Clark Floor Resurfacing" No bid will be considered unless it is made on the enclosed bid form -furnished by the Director of Public Works. In accordance with the provisions of Sections 1770 to 1780 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the Director of Industrial Relations has ascertained the general prevailing rate of wages and employer payments for health and welfare, vacation, pensions, and similar purposes applicable to the locality in which work is to be done for each craft or type of workman needed to execute the proposed contract. It will be required that not less than said rates shall be paid to all such workmen employed or engaged on the work. Complete wage rate schedules are on file at the City Hall. The contractor and any sub -contractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 (Chapter 1411, Statutes of 1986) in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. - 1 - No faithful performance or payment bond is required. No bid will be accepted from a contractor who 1'icensed in accordance with the provisions of Division 3 of the Business or Professions Code. Bid forms may be obtained at the office of bepartment, City of Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. cr for the bid form. 'A business license is required to do contracting of Hermosa Beach. has not been Chapter 9 of the Public Works There is no cost work in the City The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any irregularity or informality in any bid to the extent permitted by law. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AjAir\-M (rJ1 Anthony Antich' Director of `Rublic Works 9/11/87 clark/m - 2 DATE: 14, 5+ Contractor: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BID FORM Resurfacing Hardwood Floor at Clark Stadium .VICTOR RODAS WOOD FLOORS Address: 4537 ARTESIA BLVD. SUITE #3 Telephone: LAWNDALE, CA 90260 (213) 324-9764 (213) 214-3721 Contractor's State License No. 361314 City Business License No. 175103 Note: Hermosa Beach City Business License fee of $100 should be included in the bid price if contractor does not currently have a valid license. Contractor's cost Not To Exceed to perform work: $ 5,939.70 Comments: Cost FIVE THOUSAND, NINE HUNDRED, In Words THIRTY NINE DOLLARS'and SEVENTY CENTS Sub ui i t - : by: ' Approved: Contractor's ignature City Representative 9/11/87 BIDFORM/M 1 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL September 21, 1987 Regular Meeting of October 6, 1987 AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK PROPOSALS FOR LEASING VARIOUS CITY VEHICLES Recommendation It is recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize staff to seek proposals for lease/purchase of the following City vehicles and equipment: a. One 3 -wheel street sweeper for the Public Works Department, b. One combination street paint and sign truck for the Public Works Department, c. One engine analyzer for the Public Works Department, d. One utility van for the Community Resources Department. 2. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. Background The lease/purchase of the above mentioned vehicles and equipment was adopted as part of the City Council adopted FY87-88 budget and staff would like to begin the process of seeking proposals. Analysis This memo allows for solication of bids to leasing companies and individual vendors to provide the best lease/purchase arrangement possible. The specifications for each piece of equipment and vehicle is attached for your review and comments. After proposals are received staff will return to City Council for award of bid. Please note the department has submitted two specifications for the engine analyzer. The difference between each specification is the Bar 80 or Bar 84 option. Staff will return to City Council with a recommendation for only one of the options. 1 e ti Alternatives Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by staff are: 1. Authorize staff to go out to bid for each individual piece of equipment and vehicle. 2. Postpone the lease/purchase of City equipment and vehicles to a later date. Respj ctfull submitted Ly Ai Bubenas Adis nistrative Aide NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator An ony Antich Director of Puic Works Gayly T. Martin Interim City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed proposals will be received at the Office of the City Clerk, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA, 90254 until 11:00 a.m., Friday, , 1987. The bids will be publicly opened and read to provide the following: LEASING ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT A. One 3 -wheel street sweeper for the Public Works Department, B. One combination street paint and sign truck for the Public Works Department, C. One engine analyzer for the Public Works Department, D. One utility van for the Community Resources Department. Each proposal must be submitted on forms and in the format furnished by the bidder. The Public Works Department will accept and answer questions regarding the various equipment up to and through 5:00 p.m., Thursday, , 1987. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any irregularities in a proposal, and to award the sale. The proposal, if awarded, will be awarded to the bidder who provides the best lease/purchase arrangement meeting the City's needs. Anthony Antich Director of Public Works Date: 1 3 - WHEEL STREET SWEEPER SPECIFICATIONS 1 PROPOSAL FORM 3 - WHEEL STREET SWEEPER PROPOSAL TO THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA To furnish and deliver to the City of Hermosa Beach the following new and unused, currently -in -production equipment in accordance with the attached specifications: One (1) new, current model - 3 -Wheel Street Sweeper Delivery: 90 - 150 days. Funding Source: General Fund Proposals shall be submitted in a format of the bidders choice. Proposal price to be presented in the most cost effective payment plan for a five (5) year lease/purchase plan with a $-0- buy out. No prepayment penalty will be charged should the City decide to pay off the lease early. NOTE: Price shall be the net total price per unit excluding the 6.5% California State sales tax. This will be computed by the City. The City is exempt from the Federal excise tax and an exemption certificate will be furnished to the successful bidder. All prices quoted shall be F.O.B. City Yard, located at 555 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. The City does not endorse or recommend any particular product. The Director of Public Works shall determine whether a product meeting the minimum specifications and requirements (attached) is to be considered an "equal model". The decision of the Director of Public Works is subject to review by the City Council. 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS SWEEPER, STREET - 3 -WHEEL TYPE, 3 CUBIC YARD MINIMUM CAPACITY GENERAL: The sweeper to be furnished under this proposal shall be a combination pick up sweeper and front end unloader type; to have gutter brooms on both sides; complete with dual steering and controls easily accessible from either driving position; (dual gutter brooms); with rear wheels minimum 3 cubic yard capacity, self propelled and shall be the manufacturer's latest model and design; self -elevating type hopper. Sweeper equipment warranties shall be stated by bidder. State in each of the blank spaces in the right column below the information regart ing the vehicle offered corresponding to the specifications set forth in the left column. Failure to complete all blank spaces may invalidate the bid. WHEELBASE: 120 inches minimum. radius shall be 15' or better. ENGINE: Diesel, heavy duty industrial, 4 cylinder turbo -charged, not less than 230 cubic inch displacement, rate 95 H.P. @ 2200 RPM. Two (2) stage dry element air cleaner. Full flow oil filter system. Tgrn- COOLING: Heaviest increased capacity system available for model offered, including coolant recovery system. 50-50 mixture antifreeze/coolant to be in system. TRANSMISSION: Shall be heavy duty hydrostatic and include oil temperature and charge pressure gauges. Sweeper speed forward and reverse shall be controlled by a single foot pedal with automatic return to neutral. Two power ranges. Two year warranty. -OR- Heavy duty truck type automatic transmission with torque convertor, with 4 speeds forward and 1 reverse. Transmission oil shall be cooled with an out board oil 2 l 1 cooler. (Hayden or oil to water cooler). FINAL DRIVE: The two front drive _ wheels shall have heavy duty chain and sprockets, fully enclosed in dust proof compartments. Differential shall be heavy duty truck type. Main drive chains will be warranted for 12,000 miles or 24 months, whichever occurs first. STEERING: Full power, dual control. BRAKES: 245 sq. inch lining minimum. Service: Heavy duty, hydraulic, full power on drive wheels. Brakes shall be protected from external dust, dirt, and moisture entering the brake shoe area. All hydraulic lines shall be routed or shielded against mechanical damage and excessive corrosion. Parking: Independently operated hand lever type. WHEELS: Heavy duty steel disc, two (2) front, and two (2) rear. The rear wheels shall be designed for heavy duty twelve (12) ply tire. TIRES:_ First line quality, two front, and two rear. 2 Front: 10 X 20 12 ply 2 Rear: 8.25 X 15 12 ply Steel belted radials. CAB: Fully enclosed, all steel construction, full doors with rubber seal, opening employing automotive type handles and door latches. Dual steering controls; all controls and instrumentation shall be located within easy reach and vision for the operator seated in either left or right side driving position. All steps shall be grip strut type or approved equal, non-skid material. Steps and grab handles shall be positioned to provide safe entrance and service to the machine. All - 3 - side engine cover openings shall have hinged covers. Cab to be insulated against heat and noise. Noise suppression elements to be factory installed to meet current CAL -OSHA noise standards. Two sun visors. Two speed dual windshield wipers. Fresh air heater and ventilator, air conditioning, AM/FM radio. Two West coast mirrors with convex inserts and 2 1/2 pound fire extinguisher. SEATS: Adjustable bucket type on heavy duty torsion springs with seat safety belts. Best model offered. INSTRUMENTS: Shall include speedometer, engine coolant temperature gauge, oil pressure guage,ammeter guage, fuel tank level gauge, engine hour meter, tachometer, keyed ignition switch, and transmission oil temperature and charge pressure gauges. ELECTRICAL AND LIGHTING: General: All wiring shall be covered with heavy abrasion resistant loom and be securely held in place. Each electrical circuit, except ignition shall incorporate a circuit protection device. All holes in the cab, body, or chassis through which electrical wiring passes shall have rubber grommets. There shall also be an electrical lookout to prevent the engine from starting with the transmission controls engaged. System: 12 volt negative ground. All lighting shall comply with all California and Federal laws including CAL -OSHA regulations. 1. Battery(ies), largest option available. 2. Alternator, heavy duty, largest option available. 100 ampere minimum. 3. Headlights, hi -lo sealed beam with high beam indicator light in dash. 4. Flood Lights, sealed beam, left and right side gutter broom. 4 A 5. Tail, Stop and Turn Signal Lights, shall be mounted at extreme rear of vehicle. 6. Beacon Light, rotating, shall be mounted on top of cab with limb guard. 7. Interior cab dome light. 8. Dash instrument lights shall be on a rheostat switch. 9. Provision provided for license plate,and light. 10. Directional turn signal lamps, front and rear, Class A, Type 1, with self canceling switch, 4 -way flasher, and incorporating a transistorized flasher, electronic horn, back-up alarm. FUEL TANK: Not less than 25 gallon capacity. GUTTER BROOMS: Reuseable top plate brooms or equal. Shall be vertical digger type. Not less than 36" diameter. They shall be right and left hand mounted located behind the front wheels and shall be adjustable. Constant speed set by hand control and operates independent of speed or direction of sweeper. PICK UP BROOM: 36" diameter by 58" length minimum. Hydraulically raised and lowered and positioned by single lever in operator's compartment. CONVEYOR: Shall be rubber belt type hydraulically driven with relief valve. Capable of loading hopper to 100% of rated capacity. it shall operate completely independent of the ground speed of the sweeper. WATER SYSTEM: Tank shall be polyethelene anti -rust lined, with a capacity of not less than 200 gallons; inspection door/cover on top of tank; pump centrifugal or gear type; water level indicator gauge in cab; brass spray nozzles to cover full width of sweeping path; water strainer to be located on exterior of sweeper for easy 5 e accessibility and cleaning; filler hose 15 feet (minimum) by 2 1/2 inches with N.S.T. coupling on hydrant end. Hydrant wrench to be furnished. HOPPER: Three (3) cubic yard front dump capacity, self elevating dump height 7 1/2 fee minimum. Hopper dump controls in cab. Hopper can be dumped at any height. PAINT: All visible and exposed exterior surfaces including axle, frame, running gear and gas tank except trim, chrome, glass, and rubber shall be shot blasted, prime coated and sprayed with a rust. inhi- bitor. Entire under carriage must be under coated to prevent rust. Color: White. SERVICE AND WARRANTY: The vendor shall furnish a standard manufacturer's service and warranty policy and shall pay any cost of inspection and adjustment that may be necessary in accordance with the warranty. SERVICE MANUALS: The vendor shall furnish two (2) sets of parts books and complete service manuals. ACCESSORIES: 1. One (1) extra main cable wrap type pick-up broom. 2. Two (2) extra gutter brooms. 3. Standard set of tools necessary for standard equipment adjustments. DELIVERY: Sweeper to be bid F.O.B. Hermosa Beach - City Yard, 555 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, California and be installed by a qualified serviceman. The unit is to be delivered in first class operating condition with acceptance subject to purchaser's inspection and approval. REGISTRATION: All documents required for registering of vehicles with Department of Motor Vehicles, including Weigh Master's - 6 - Certificate, if applicable, shall be supplied at time of delivery. Vehicles shall comply with all California and Federal laws includingCAL-OSHA regulations. 7 COMBINATION PAINT AND SIGN TRUCK SPECIFICATIONS PROPOSAL FORM COMBINATION PAINT AND SIGN TRUCK PROPOSAL TO THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH To furnish and deliver to the City of Hermosa Beach the following new and unused, currently -in -production equipment in accordance with the attached specifications: One (1) new, current model - Combination Paint and Sign Truck Delivery: 45 - 60 Days Funding Source: General Fund Proposals shall be submitted in a format of the bidders choice. Proposal price to be presented in the most cost effective payment plan for a five (5) year lease/purchase.plan with a $-0- buy out. No prepayment penalty will be charged should the City decide to pay off the lease early. NOTE: Price shall be the net total price per unit excluding the 6.5% California State sales tax. This will be computed by the City. The City is exempt from the Federal excise tax and an exemption certificate will be furnished to the successful bidder. All prices quoted shall be F.O.B. City Yard, located at 555 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. The City does not endorse or recommend any particular product. The Director of Public Works shall determine whether a product meeti-ng the minimum specifications and requirements (attached) is to be considered an "equal model". The decision of the Director of Public Works is subject to review by the City Council. Manuals: Price to include one (1) complete Technical Services Manual for truck and all other equipment and one (1) Parts Book for models supplied and one (1) Owner's Manual. Additional copies may be requested by the City at time of order. Pre -Construction Meetings: Two construction meetings will be required. The first will be within ten days from the Notice to Proceed, to be held with the successful bidder and any suppliers or fabricators associated with the vehicle. The second meeting will be for final approval of paint color, body design and equipment. Both meetings will be at bidders expense and at the location of manufacturing. Notification: The vendor shall notify the City at (213) 376-6984, ext. 261 not less than five (5) days in advance that the vehicle is ready for the following inspection: 1 1. Initial inspection of components during preliminary stages of construction. 2. Pre-delivery inspection of completed vehicle. 3. Final inspection at dealership. Dealer Service: The equipment furnished under this contract shall be completely serviced locally by the vendor prior to delivery. It shall be ready for operation when delivered. Any connection with repairs or adjustments covered by the manufacturer's or dealer's warranty. Registration: All documents required for registration of vehicles with Department of Motor Vehicles, including WEIGHTMASTER'S CERTIFICATE if applicable, shall be supplied at time of delivery. Dealer must include one (1) copy of registration documents to City. Dealer is responsible for filing the exempt registration. Compliance with Motor Vehicle Law: All equipment, materials or services provided shall conform to the State of California Motor Vehicle Code, California Division of Industrial Safety OSHA, and all other applicable State and Federal laws. Gross Vehicle Weight Rating: All vehicles shall meet the Federal GVWR and all components shall have corresponding GVWR. Any vehicle that requires a larger wheel and tire size on the rear axle shall have an equal size wheel and tire on the front axle unless otherwise specified. Warranty: The bidder guarantees the complete apparatus to be furnished under these specifications against defects in material and workmanship for a period of 1 year or 12,000 miles, and 3 year or 36,000 miles for power train, whichever occurs first from date of acceptance. Repairs during the warranty will be at no cost to the City. 2 CITY OF.HERMOSA BEACH SPECIFICATIONS State in each of the blank spaces in the right column below the information regard ing the vehicle offered corresponding to the specifications set forth in the left column. Failure to complete all blank spaces may invalidate the bid. Truck GVW rating 11,000 pounds 2 W.D. Paint: White Cab: All steel, bench seat, knitted vinyl w/color- keyed rubber floor mats, 3 seat belts. . Frame: Dual rear wheels on a 161" W.B. 84.0" CA. Ladder -type frame designed for top-rated payload. Transmission: Filly automatic 3 speeds forward 1 reverse. External oil cooler. OPTIONS • Engine - Hobbs hour meter tenths for truck engine cab mount. 7.5L Gas V-8 Front bumper chrome plated Fuel Tank inside frame rails 19 gal. capacity Steering full power - Oil Filter full flow type w/throw away element Air cleaner - dry element Alternator 12V no less 85 amp 20 amp @ 600 rpm Super Cooling Radiator & heavy duty fan Two (2) 12 Volt heavy duty batteries - 68 amp, maint. free, dual battery auttic control switch Rear axle capacity 8,250 lbs. GAWR - Lowest ratio 4.10 CA. Front axle 5,000 lbs. Spring: Front -factory springs 4,100 combined rating @ ground. .Rear -factory springs 9,264 combined rating @ ground. Heavy Duty Shocks all around C-1 Cab, tinted glass, swing -a -way mirrors 6" X 16' head Gauge package, dashmounted Variable speed wipers Power brakes, front disc, rear drum Dash vents, cigarette lighter, heater, defroster, armrest, sun visor, domelight Wheels & Tires: Seven (7) steel disc. wheels 8 hole 16 X 6K Tire 7.50 X 16D Mud guards if required by Calif. code HYDRAULIC AIRLESS SPECIFICATIONS ( r BODY: All steel body to measure a minimum 135" long X 90" wide. Frame shall consist of "box" construction. Deck to be 1/8" diamond sloped sufficiently to pre- vent standing liquids. Headboard to extend 20" above deck. Frame to incorporate 2" X 2" 3/16" tubing crossrnmbers @ 16 O.C. side skirts of 12" gauge steel. Nltal skirts that are not reinforced full length will not be accepted. Tool box under the deck on right side (curb side) will be approximately 12 cubic feet with flush side hinged rain resistant locking door. All doors to be side hinged, bottom hinged doors will not be accepted. Service access doors to provide ease of access to hose reel and tool box compartments. The minimum door size is 31" X 20". Access - doors smaller er than these minimums will not be acceptable. Addition- ally, constructed in the top access door will be a cut out for each spray gun allowing the gun to be locked into the hose reel carTpartment without disconnecting the gun frau the paint hose. 1-12 lb. 11 oz. fire ex- tinguisher ABC rated dry chemical mounted on truck body as instructed. PAINT TRAY: Six 1" steel rings to be mounted on a removable tray with side handles to be placed in reeesoed right front paint storage well to prevent 5 gallon paint cans frau shifting. Paint storage well to be drilled for drain- age. Paint storage tray to be secured with 4 "T" handled bolts for easy removal. GUN SOLVENT BATH: Dual hose roller assemblies mounted in rear body panel Dual recessed 3" diameter minimum paint gun solvent bath holsters which must be removable for easy clean- ing. HYDRAULIC RESERVOIR: 30 gallon capacity. Shall be an integral part of body headboard. Shall be mounted above pump piston to pro- vide positive lead. Reservoir shall have incorporated into it a vent, oil filler plug, oil drain plug and oil level sight glass. Bolt on hydraulic reservoir tank will not be accepted. HYDRAULIC SYSTEM: Minimum i rum 9_9 GPM @ 1000 RPM hydraulic gear pump with electric clutch. Pure to be engine mounted and Dual V Belt driven auu crankshaft pully and controlled by electronic type throttle control. 10 micron return line spin on oil filter. One 1000 PSI maximum pres- sure regulator and gauge for each paint pump. Key operated cab mounted switch with indicator light. Rear mounted waterproof on/off safety switch. All hoses, piping and fittings to be S.A.E. hydraulic rated. D-1 HYDRAULIC AIRLESS SPECIFICATIONS (cont'd) PUMP SAFETY SWITCH: ` A park/neutral safety switch shall be installed so that when the vehicle is placed in gear or the brake pedal is depressed, the throttle is automatically disengaged. BODY LIGHTS: Combination stop/turn tail lights, clearance lights and side marker lights. All lights and reflectors to conform to Federal Motor Vehicle safety standard 108 made waterproof. PAINT: Cab, body and wheels to be manufacturers white. Body to be chipped, ground flush and sanded prior to painting. Body to be painted the sane color as cab. STENCIL RACK: Constructed of 2" square steel tubing to accommodate twenty (20) stencils stacked on edge to a height of 36". Each stencil space will be 1-3/4" in width. A stencil deck roller and stop will be incorporated. The rack shall be affixed to the deck by a minimae of four (4) rust proof bolts and nuts. One (1) addition- al stencil space 48" height 1-3/4" width, closed on top, removable rack & raised about 1" fran truck bad. BUMPER: Rear bumper shall be the full width of the vehicle and shall protrude a minimum of 9 inches to the rear. Rear shall be constructed of diamond plate steel and paint- ed the color of the vehicle. Dual purpose hitch, ball & pintle hook, 7 prong trailer connector. Minimae 17" LLLilt ground. PAINT SPRAY SYSTEM: # Graco Hydraulic Airless Paint Spray Systems in- cluding: Airless Pump (Viscount I-3000) with hard chrome over stainless steel lowers mounted on street side of heaclboad. Each airless pup to include suc- tion hose and tube for 5 gallon paint pail, hydraulic connection hose, quarter turn shut-off valve, 60 mesh paint filter and manifold and high'pressure 3300 PSI connection hoses. All hoses, fittings, valves and connections shall be pressure tested to 3300 PSI. HOSE REEL AND GUN: # Graco Spring rewind, Cal-Rez packed, Graco Dual Hose Reels with 50 ft. each of 4' high pressure 3000 PSI static grounded hose, hose ball stops and three foot each of whip -end hoses. Graco Goldenmastic #206718 spray guns with 18" gun extensions and a RAC self cleaning spray nozzle with tip guard. # 206310 fluid hose reels to be mounted on curb side and #Graco fluid hose reels mounted on street side. Only genuine Graco parts to be used in order to uphold Greco war- ranty. Drain holes to be provided for all cabinet spaces. D-2 HYDRAULIC AIRLESS SPECT CATIONS (cont'd) SIGN POST RACK: A sign post rack consisting of four (4) risers. Each riser will attain a height of 90" from ground raised to be capped. Lat and long limbers will be welded four inches from top of risers. This rack will be equipped with front end stop and be capable of carry- ing four (4) 4 X 4 sign posts of various lengths. 1 , •: � J I611 •.-. -. -. - .T-.! .• •f• �kiti..t�• - --?yl--• • �. .1. - :. 1+ - Top of tool box off looking down into box. • �� �, .-r. 4! :sem _ - _ •��. 'fir. ' r•4,,7•-•.-"'•-•+ �r 'r 17 • 180fle-":- ion r. Front view door removed Two (2) Tool Box approximate 12,Z or max -usage, both on curb side with one sheaf • 10" down frau top of box 18" deep with -6" trays. 1• ic • t-, 11-F•-1-. may- -s]-ri �. - ,. A .i......,..-,....„..:.._-.7 �._M1 75: = -- ^- _M �� Paint pumps • r Looking down :@ track -bed • it 1' O Roller _ _ Rear View - 20 Stencil @ 1 3/4" -width 36" height -- - -- _ .' " 1 Stencil space @ 1-3/4' width •_ - 48' .height J Open Top . StendiI a- s re-e1rtA' 1700 J a m 4-1 O11\ UV.l • k---- ;tic( l TCA 4? Y o(1 -at> (-) • I_, . • . . •.r•• . lor•__— _. • 1 • 7-; 171C' -7 Y.7 • ti 'i • I, • 'I • I;: • •.1 I• • • I:' 1 r r,•1',, . ' i ";• '1.1' . l• } UTILITY VAN WITH SIDE SLIDING DOOR SPECIFICATIONS PROPOSAL FORM UTILITY VAN WITH SIDE SLIDING DOOR PROPOSAL TO THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA To furnish and deliver to the City of Hermosa Beach the following new and unused, currently -in -production equipment in accordance with the attached specifications: One (1) new, current model - 3/4 Ton Utility Van with Side Sliding Door Delivery: In stock. Funding Source: General Fund Proposals shall be submitted in a format of the bidders choice. Proposal price to be presented in the most cost effective payment plan for a five (5) year lease/purchase.plan with a $-0- buy out. No prepayment penalty will be charged should the City decide to pay off the lease early. NOTE: Price shall be the net total price per unit excluding the 6.5% California State sales tax. This will be computed by the City. The City is exempt from the Federal excise tax and an exemption certificate will be furnished to the successful bidder. All prices quoted shall be F.O.B. City Yard, located at 555 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. The City does not endorse or recommend any particular product. The Director of Public Works shall determine whether a product meeting the minimum specifications and requirements (attached) is to be considered an "equal model". The decision of the Director of Public Works is subject to review by the City Council. 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS UTILITY VAN WITH SIDE SLIDING DOOR GENERAL: State in each of the blank spaces in the right column below the information regarding the vehicle offered corresponding to the specifications set forth in the left column. Failure to complete all blank spaces may invalidate the bid. The van to be furnished under this proposal shall be a 3/4 ton, 260 cubic foot capacity, multipurpose, passenger vehicle with a side sliding door and rear swing out• doors. Van equipment warranties shall be stated by bidder. ENGINE: __ Base Equipment: 5.7 liter, EFI, Gas, V8 Clutch: 11", 124 sq. in. Air Filter: Oiled -paper Element Oil Filter: Throwaway Type Exhaust System: Single; Aluminized Emission Control System: Meet Government Requirement TRANSMISSION: 4 speed Automatic with Overdrive Shift Location: Heavy duty radiator/transmission cooler. BRAKES: Front: Disc; 11.86" Rotor Rear:— Drim; 11.15" x 2.75" Booster: Dual Diaphragm Parking: Cable to Rear Wheels WHEELS: (5) Disc 15" x 6" TIRES: (4) Black wall, all season steel belted radials (1) Spare, black wall, all season, steel belted radial tire. SUSPENSION, Front: Front stabilizer bar; Independent; Coil Springs Capacity: 3,400 lb. Springs @ ground: 1,700 lb. ea. Shock Absorbers: 32mm dia. 2 SUSPENSION, Rear: Salisbury Axle; Hypoid Drive; Two-stage Multi -leaf Springs Axle Capacity: 3,500 bl. Axle Ratio: 3.08 Springs @ ground: Heavy Duty 1,700 lb. ea. Shock Absorbers: 32mm dia. STEERING GEAR TYPE: Integral Power FRAME: _ Integral Body -frame ELECTRICAL: General: 12 volt; negative ground Battery: Freedom Type - 530 CCA @ 0 F. Reserve Capacity: 75 min. @ 80 F. Delcotron Generator: 85 amp. Gages: Voltage, oil, temperature FUEL TANK: Not less than 33 gallon capacity. PAINT: All visible and exposed exterior surfaces except trim, chrome, glass, and rubber shall be painted white. SERVICE AND WARRANTY: The vendor shall furnish a standard manufacturer's service and warranty policy and shall pay any cost of inspection and adjustment that may be necessary in accordance with the warranty. SERVICE MANUALS: The vendor shall furnish complete service manuals. ACCESSORIES: Tinted Windshield Rear Door fixed glass Vinal Auxiliary seat Air Conditioning in Front Painted Mirror/Exterior, Below eye Front Stabilizer bar DELIVERY: The van is to be delivered in first class operating condition with acceptance subject to purchaser's inspection and approval. 3 REGISTRATION: All documents required for registering of vehicles with Department of Motor Vehicles, including Weigh Master's Certificate, if applicable, shall be supplied at time of delivery. Vehicles shall comply with all California and Federal laws including CAL -OSHA regulations. 4 EXPANDABLE COMPUTER FOR AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE TESTING AND COMPATABLE FOUR (4) GAS FUEL ANALYZER �,- SPECIFICATIONS BAR 80* *California Bureau of Automotive Repair- 1980 PROPOSAL FORM EXPANDABLE COMPUTER FOR AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE TESTING PROPOSAL TO THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA To furnish and deliver to the City of Hermosa Beach the following new and unused, currently -in -production equipment in accordance with the attached specifications: One (1) new, current model - Computerized Automotive Engine Tester And Compatable Four (4) Gas Fuel Analyzer BAR 80 Delivery: Two Weeks Funding Source: General Fund Proposals shall be submitted in a format of the bidders choice. Proposal price to be presented in the most cost effective payment plan for a five (5) year lease/purchase plan with a $-0- buy out. No prepayment penalty will be charged should the City decide to pay off the lease early. NOTE: Price shall be the net total price per unit excluding the 6.5% California State sales tax. This will be computed by the City. The City is exempt from the Federal excise tax and an exemption certificate will be furnished to the successful bidder. All prices quoted shall be F.O.B. City Yard, located at 555 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. The City does not endorse or recommend any particular product. The Director of Public Works shall determine whether a product meeting the minimum specifications and requirements (attached) is to be considered an "equal model". The decision of the Director of Public Works is subject to review by the City Council. 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS COMPUTERIZED AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE TESTER AND COMPATABLE FOUR (4) GAS FUEL ANALYZER GENERAL: The solid state computerized automotive engine tester and fuel analyzer to be furnished under this proposal shall be a BAR 80 approved fuel analyzer that must interface with in-house computers. System shall be equipped to update new service packages and legislated state testing programs with interchangeable circuit boards. Equipment warranties shall be stated by bidder for parts and labor. Vendor specify: State in each of the blank spaces in the right hand column below the information regard ing the equipment offered corresponding to the specifications set forth in the left column. Failure to complete all blank spaces may invalidate the bid. STANDARD FEATURES: 1. Bar graph, light pen entry of complete vehicle specification. 2. Full remote control unit allowing work to be performed at console, remote location, inside vehicle or under hood of vehicle. 3. Computer card cage providing expansion and update capabilities. 4. 19-", or larger, video screen to display all test information including digitalized ignition wave forms. Computer shall produce meter graphics with digital support for RPM, volts vacuum, timing and CO/HC, additional items OHMS, AMPS and 0 /CO . Digitally displayed 5. Computer terminal keyboard, sealed against dirt and moisture. 6. Battery test capabilities. 7. Tester shall have the ability to test direct ignitions systems (D.S.I.) TESTS: Engine Tester 1. Check coil output without removing wires 2. Primary circuit ignition test 3. Ballast resistance 4. Accessory scope patterns 5. Complete battery tests without cranking 6. Starter 7. Alternator 8. Voltage regulator 9. Tach dwell 10. Emissions 11. Power check 12. Timing 13. Relative compression 14. Vehicle system may also be tested through service testing capability. 15. Ignition module testing 16. Milli -second time display 17. EFI pattern display System shall give instructions for a comprehensive test series, Perform tests, Store data, Print all information. TESTS: Fuel Analyzer 1. Diagnose fuel system problems. 2. Diagnose emissions levels. INCLUDED IN CABINET MOUNTING: A. Digital Waveforms To include scope pattern to include Sequential, Raster and Parade pattern. B. Digital Meters All meters graphically displayed on screen. HC 0-200 PPM CO 0-10% CO 0-20% RPM 0-30,000 C. Digital Displays Vacuum 0-30"Hg RPM 0-30,000 Timing 360° to +360° Magnetic Timing 20° to 180° Dwell Percent 0-100% Dwell Percent 0-360° Standard Volts 0-40 V DC Search Volts -40 - 40 VDC OHMS OTO 1500K CH 0-2000 PPM 3 CO 0-10% CO 0-20% CO 0-25% AMPS -1000 - 1000 - Battery Temp. -50° C (-57° F) to 100° C (212° F) - Oil Temp. -75° (-130° F) to 150° C (3030 F) - Exhaust Temp. up to 654° C (1200° F) D. Leads Length Pull function remote control 25' Battery load 15' Volt search 15' OHMS 15' Magnetic Timing 15' Induction #1 10' Induction secondary 10' Induction AMPS 15' Primary set 10' Vacuum 10' Oil Temp 18' Exhaust Temperature 30' Exhaust Pick-up 30' Timing light 15' E. Miscellaneous - Labeled membrane on push-button switches - Separate vacuum pump - Manual or automatic cylinder balancing - Lighted head sign boom - High-intensity light power 115 V 60 H OPTIONS: 1. GM and Ford Test Modual compatable to all on -board engine computers in 1982 and later models, and to •includ.e all necessary leads and adaptors as follows: Leads: C-3 25' ALDL connection lead Ford EECIV/MCU 25 3 pin connection with EECIV Pig tail Digital Displays: - Coolant demp degree C & degree F also OHMS -Vacuum in KPA/PSI/volts - RPM - Oxygen in volts 4 -TPS in percent/volts - Duty cycle in percent/volts - Loop condition open/close -Fault code displayed along with description -Multimeter -Volts/OHMS/Vacuum/RPM/Eng. Temp. TRAINING PROGRAM: The successful bidder shall provide a training program for all employees using the computerized system. 5 EXPANDABLE COMPUTER FOR AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE TESTING - AND COMPATABLE FOUR (4) GAS FUEL ANALYZER SPECIFICATIONS BAR 84* *California .B'Jreau: of.. Automotive Repair - 1984 4 PROPOSAL FORM EXPANDABLE COMPUTER FOR AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE TESTING PROPOSAL TO THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA To furnish and deliver to the City of Hermosa Beach the following new and unused, currently -in -production equipment in accordance with the attached specifications: One (1) new, current model - Computerized Automotive Engine Tester Delivery: Funding Source: And Compatable Four (4) Gas Fuel Analyzer BAR 84 Two Weeks General Fund Proposals shall be submitted in a format of the bidders choice. Proposal price to be presented in the most cost effective payment plan for a five (5) year lease/purchase plan with a $-0- buy out. No prepayment penalty will be charged should the City decide to pay off the lease early. NOTE: Price shall be the net total price per unit excluding the 6.5% California State sales tax. This will be computed by the City. The City is exempt from the Federal excise tax and an exemption certificate will be furnished to the successful bidder. All prices quoted shall be F.O.B. City Yard, located at 555 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. The City does not endorse or recommend any particular product. The Director of Public Works shall determine whether a product meeting the minimum specifications and requirements (attached) is to be considered an "equal model". The decision of the Director of Public Works is subject to review' by the City Council. 1 -4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS COMPUTERIZED AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE TESTER AND COMPATABLE FOUR (4) GAS FUEL ANALYZER GENERAL: The solid state computerized automotive engine tester and fuel analyzer to be furnished under this proposal shall be a BAR 84 approved fuel analyzer that must interface with in-house computers. System shall be equipped to update new service packages and legislated state testing programs with interchangeable circuit boards. Equipment warranties shall be stated by bidder for parts and labor. Vendor specify: State in each of the blank spaces in the right hand column below the information regarc ing the equipment offered corresponding to the specifications set forth in the left column. Failure to complete all blank spaces may invalidate the bid. STANDARD FEATURES: 1. Bar graph, light pen entry of complete vehicle specification. 2. Full remote control unit allowing work to be performed at console, remote location, inside vehicle or under hood of vehicle. 3. Computer card cage providing expansion and update capabilities. 4. 19", or larger, video screen to display all test information including digitalized ignition wave forms. Computer shall produce meter graphics with digital support for RPM, volts vacuum, timing and CO/HC, additional items OHMS, AMPS and 0 /CO . Digitally displayed 5. Computer terminal keyboard, sealed against dirt and moisture. 6. Battery test capabilities. 7. Tester shall have the ability to test direct ignitions systems (D.S.I.) TESTS: Engine Tester 1. Check coil output without removing wires 2. Primary circuit ignition test • r 3. Ballast resistance 4. Accessory scope patterns 5. Complete battery tests without cranking 6. Starter 7. Alternator 8. Voltage regulator 9. Tach dwell 10. Emissions 11. Power check 12. Timing 13. Relative compression 14. Vehicle system may also be tested through service testing capability. 15. Ignition module testing 16. Milli -second time display 17. EFI pattern display System shall give instructions for a comprehensive test series, Perform tests, Store data, Print all information. TESTS: Fuel Analyzer 1. Diagnose fuel system problems. 2. Diagnose emissions levels. INCLUDED IN CABINET MOUNTING: A. Digital Waveforms To include scope pattern to include Sequential, Raster and Parade pattern. B. Digital Meters All meters graphically displayed on screen. HC 0-200 PPM CO 0-10% CO 0-20% RPM 0-30,000 C. Digital Displays Vacuum 0-30"Hg RPM 0-30,000 Timing 360° to +360° Magnetic Timing 20° to 180° Dwell Percent 0-100% Dwell Percent 0-360° Standard Volts 0-40 V DC Search Volts -40 - 40 VDC OHMS OTO 1500K CH 0-2000 PPM 3 r +y CO 0-10% CO 0-20% CO 0-25% AMPS -1000 - 1000 -Battery Temp. -50° C (-57° F) to 100° C (212° F) - Oil Temp. -75°(-130° F) to 150° C (303°` F) - Exhaust Temp. up to 654° C (1200° F) D. Leads Length Pull function remote control 25' Battery load 15' Volt search 15' OHMS 15' Magnetic Timing 15' Induction #1 10' Induction secondary 10' Induction AMPS 15' Primary set 10' Vacuum 10' Oil Temp 18' Exhaust Temp erature 30' Exhaust Pick-up 30' Timing light 15' E. Miscellaneous - Labeled membrane on push-button switches - Separate vacuum pump - Manual or automatic cylinder balancing - Lighted head sign boom - High-intensity light power 115 V 60 H A.C. OPTIONS: 1. GM and Ford Test Modual compatable to all on -board engine computers in 1982 and later models, and to include -all necessary leads and adaptors as follows: Leads: C-3 25' ALDL connection lead Ford EECIV/MCU 25 3 pin connection with EECIV Pig tail Digital Displays: - Coolant demp degree C & degree F also OHMS - Vacuum in KPA/PSI/volts -RPM -Oxygen in volts - 4 - TPS in percent/volts - Duty cycle in percent/volts - Loop condition open/close - Fault code displayed along with description - Multimeter - Volts/OHMS/Vacuum/RPM/Eng. Temp. TRAINING PROGRAM: The successful bidder shall provide a training program for all employees using the computerized system. 5 September 23, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 13, 1987 PIER GROUNDING SYSTEM - CIP 85-203 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize staff to advertise for bids for repair of the pier lighting grounding system at the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier, and issue addenda as necessary. Background: On June 23, 1987, City Council approved the Capital Improvements Budget which included the repairs on the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier (CIP 85-203, Exhibit A). However, before the light fixtures can be upgraded, the electrical grounding of the pier infrastructure is required. On March 28, 1987, staff contracted the professional services of Ronald Nisbett Associates to report on and conduct an underwater survey to identify the condition of the existing grounding system. This report (which, including photographs, is on file in the Public Works Department), indicates that the existing grounding system is in a state of disrepair, and in need of replacement. On May 12, 1987, staff once again engaged the professional services of Ronald Nisbett Associates to develop design drawings and procedures for these repairs. This report is also on file in the Public Works Department and has been incorporated in the plans and specifications for CIP 85-203. Analysis: These plans and specifications are on file in the office of the City. Clerk for review. Authorization .to advertise for bids is requested at this time. A project schedule is indicated on Exhibit B. 1 1 n w Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact at this time. However, as you can see from Exhibit A, the original total budgeted amount was $24,200; only $13,200 of which was budgeted for FY 87-88. It was anticipated that construction would begin in FY 86-87 and that only $13,200 would be required to complete the project in FY 87-88. Due to the complexity of this project (the difficulty locating a qualified design firm for such a specialized project, the need for an underwater investigation, etc.) we were unable to start construction in FY 86-87. Consequently, the $13,200 budgeted for FY 87-88 are the only funds available at this time for the entire construction of this project. Since the estimated cost for construction is $17,402 (Exhibit C), additional funds may be required. After the bids are received, staff will return to Council requesting additional funds, if necessary. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Drop the project. 2. Modify the scope of the project. Respectfully Submitted, Con ur: Deborah M. Murphy 1 Assistant Engineer Ccur: Gayle f'. Martin Inter m City Manager An ony Antich Director of Pu: is Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Attachments: Exhibit A, Copy of CIP 85-203 Budget Exhibit B, Project Schedule Exhibit C, Engineers Estimate 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87` THRU, FY88-89 SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER: PROGRAM AREA: Pier Lighting Repairs CIP 85-203 105-401-8203-4201 Street Lighting Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: WORK PROPOSED: Requires electrical grounding of Pier infra -structure (from railing to ocean floor) before• light fixtures can be upgraded. Grounding system (including unique engineering design drawings and possible underwater construction) should be accomplished in FY86-87. Light standards mayithen be purchased and installed in Summer, 1987. BUDGET SCHEDULE Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 •Col 6 Col 7 EXPENDED PROJECT ELEMENTS BUDGET THRU FY86-87 2/28/87 6/30/87 BALANCE FY87-88 FY88-89 BUDGET I I I I I I 1 I 1 1,000/°I 1,00 01 01 01 01 1,000/ I 2,000101 2,000/ or 0 0/ 0 2,000/ 1_151.9091'. 0I_ L00.91_112001) . 1030001 01_ 1510001 I__ 22000101 2,0001 0 2,0001 0 4,0001 I I EST'ED EST'ED TOTAL THRU FY86-87 PROJECT PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS, SPECS & ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1- SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY==ame====== —LULL TOTAL EXPENDITURE 22,000 20,0001 FUNDING SCHEDULE 01 10,000, 0,000, 10,000_ 12 a 0 (0 (0 0 22,00() (�� ( dbcool6i7 d� oom�d2i2Y sncl iluat'cie....... Yn��Q1ki�Y1� 0 11,000 11,000 13,200 •0 24,200 FUND NO.' FUNDING SOURCES 105 Lighting Fund irk**************** I I 22,000 FUNDING DISTRIBUTION ************** TOTAL I 1 1 I 01 11,0001 11,000 13,2001 24,2001 I I I -;---1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 TOTAL FUNDING 22,000 0 11,000: 11,000 13,200 24,200 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Pier Grounding Repairs PROJECT NAME TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : ® o a o =r,. CIP 85-203 ACTUAL SCHEDULE -p ACCOUNT NUMBER - I - .,.1-IW1 1 1 1 X 100%COMPLETE 1 1 W TASKS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG 1 SEPI OCT I NOV DEC 1 --- --- Final design approval before advertising itrnrrni�m- for construction I I I I �11II 1 I LEGEND Prepare advertisement & set bid opening date Advertising period (issue addendums as necessary) Accept sealed bids & public bid opening Review bids Award contract Sign contract (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) Preconstruction meeting procedure Issue "Notice to Proceed" Construction Period Monitor progress & maintain records Progress payment and change order procedure I Acceptance of work as complete Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" Retention Payment Project close out I 1 1 fill-- I ' I I liniil 1 1 I I 1 1 , _1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 --ice 1 1 1 1 1 I ---- Hi, 1 1 1 I — Tr. I 1 1� 1 11 1 1 ' 1 Tnrinif --1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RONALD NISBET ASSOCIATES, INC. 1. Grounding System 1.1 Materials Engineer's Estimate Exhibit C (page 1) Grounding cable to connect six ground rods to pier lower railing. 500 feet CO 30 cents per foot Grounding rods as specified. Six rods 0 $70.00 each Grounding cable attachment clamps at an approximate price of $120.00 per clamp x 36 (approx.) clamps 1.2 Installation It is assumed that installation of topside clamps will take place at the same time as underwater work. Two days have been allocated to ground rod installation due to the uncertainty of the success of the method employed. Cleaning, one day Clamp installation, one day Ground rod driving, two days Cable hook-up and securing, one day Topside -clamp installation and hook-up • two da.y.s 0 01200 per day Representation and quality assurance 0 $320.00 per day Final report and photography documentation 10x allowance for overunsldelays e.g. weather downtime in surf zone $125.00 $420.00 $4320.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 $2000.00 51000.00 $2400.00 $1600.00 0500.00 Total $14,365.00 $1437.00 Total $15,802.00 RONALD NISBET ASSOCIATES, INC. =2. :Concr_ete Repair -2.1 •Materials Exhibit C Page 2 of 2 pages. :"Splash Zone" epoxy resin compound 0 $60.00 per -two gallon kit. hk-Nith& Minimum 40 gallons required; exact extent of repairs to be decided $1200.00 2.2 Preparation end Application Exact extent of repairs to be decided. Estimate two man team working two days topside only. $400.00 Total $1600.00 September 30, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council October 13, 1987 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CABLE TV CONSULTING SERVICES Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached request for proposal for cable TV consulting services. Background: At your regularly scheduled meeting of August 11, 1987, the City Council directed staff to prepare an RFP for cable consulting services, and pursue agreement with Manhattan Beach to share cost of hiring consultant. These services to be conducted in November, at a cost not to exceed $5,000, This action was taken by the Council after a six-month progress review, pertaining to the assignment of cable TV rights to ML Media Partners. The progress review indicated there were serious concerns regarding the technical performance of the cable TV system. At the time of review, ML presented a plan for system upgrade and preventative maintenance. Analysis: The purpose of hiring a consultant in this matter, is to determine whether ML Media has in fact met their goals of compliance with industry standards in technical performance. The City Council acknowledges the fact, that there is no one on staff with the technical expertise to verify compliance. With the changes in federal law prohibiting local control over cable TV and the final renewal leg of our current fifteen year franchise due for consideration within the year, it essential that we pursue those avenues available, to ensure good service to our community/subscribers. At the time of preparation of this agenda item, we have not had a response from the City of Manhattan Beach re: sharing cost. This issue is scheduled to go before the Manhattan Beach City Council 1 16 on October 6th. We will provide you with an update prior to your meeting of the 13th, assuming action is taken by Manhattan Beach. J- n Noon General Services Director Concur: (2,. ay e Martin City M. ager 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Cable TV Consulting Services The City of Hermosa Beach is requesting submission of proposal for the following: Cable TV consulting services to include: ▪ Analysis and evaluation of system technical upgrade as proposed by cable operator • Spot check of test locations ▪ Distribution plant testing ▪ Signal quality measurements to be made at the headend for satellite services and off -the -air broadcast TV • Determination of full compliande with industry standards, generally the National Cable Television Association and the Society of Cable Television Engineers standards ▪ Final report of findings and recommendations All work to be conducted under the supervision of a registered engineer. In your proposal, please include the following information: 1. By task (listed above), a cost not to exceed for analysis plus report. 2. Estimated personnel hours by classification and wage rate. 3. Scope of work. 4. Personnel to be assigned to this work and their back- ground. 5. Three references for similar work performed. 6. Estimated time of completion. J All proposals shall be submitted to the office of the Director of General Services of the City of Hermosa Beach by Friday, October 30, 1987, no later than 10:00 a.m. All proposals shall be in writing and shall include all services to be provided. Proposals are to be signed by an authorized agent of the firm submitting the proposal and shall include a cost not to exceed. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals in order to select the proposal deemed by the City to be in its best interest. The consultant shall complete all work within 31 calendar days from the Notice to Proceed. The Director reserves the right to extend any time frame. Questions regarding the proposal may be directed to: Joan Noon General Services Director (213) 376-6984, ext. 257 2 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTA. INFORMATION October 13, 1987 Regular Meeting of October 13, 1987 HERMOSA COMMUTER BUS RIDERSHIP INFORMATION Ridership for August, 1987 - 416 passengers Ridership for July, 1987 - 411 passengers (September figures are unavailable at this time) This information is incorporated in the Planning Department Activity Report submitted to City Council members every month. Staff realizes that ridership for this service is very low, however, it is important that this service not be eliminated in order to keep the existing passengers while the Commuter Study is in progress and until improvements can be made. If this service is eliminated, marketing efforts for implementation of the new program will be serverly hampered, because existing riders will not have faith in the success of the new improved service based on past occurrences. It is important that the City maintain the support of these passengers, however few, and not eliminate a service that they can depend on. Furthermore, on June 23, 1987, the City Council approved elimination of three Hermosa Commuter Bus runs. Since, the reduction, expenditures for this service have decreased by approximately 50%. Costs prior to elimination of runs - $569.63 per day - $ 71.20 per trip CONCUR ) ri Michael Schubach C.: 'fanning Dir ctorr /: '' - ‘,7 fi 1..1)t-'-ec--;,- bay T. Martin Interim City Manager Current costs - $290.00 per day - $ 36.25 per trip Respectfully subm ,/ L -'Lisa Breisacher Planning Aide CcRiZe--rkir LE,s ait-%ac,5c�ti�fcc- "7,/ 27c" sr's? c../e07t.A.1 4 cl`c7/&*.y)cA; - Jyze-t 1p 7m7-373 %1Dcdt-irr CR October 5, 1987 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL October 18, 1987 CONTRACT EXTENSION WITH COMMUNITY TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. TO OPERATE THE HERMOSA COMMUTER BUS RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve a 6 -month contract extension with Community Transit Services, Inc. to operate the Hermosa Commuter Bus. ABSTRACT The current contract expires October 15, 1987. The 6 -month extension is necessary to complete the Commuter Study and implement a new service. BACKGROUND On June 23, 1987, City Council approved a 90 -day contract extension with Community Transit Services, Inc. to operate services the Hermosa Commuter Bus. On August 25, 1987, City Council approved Ekistic consulting services for the Commuter Transportation Implementation Plan. ANALYSIS Due to revision of the estimated timeline for the Commuter Transportation Implementation Plan, a 6 -month contract with Community Transit Services, Inc. to operate the Hermosa Commuter Bus is necessary until the new commuter service can be implemented. The cost for 6 months of service totals $39,440. This figure is reduced by more than 50% as a result of previous eliminations to this service. CONCUR: Michael Schubac lanning Director Gay- T. Martin Cit'. Manager 1 Resp ctfully submitted, - , .ce-44 Lisa Bre acher Planning Aide NOTED�� FOR FISCAL IMPACT: , Viki Copeland Finance Administrator 1 P 1 2 3 4 5 6 i 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EXTENSION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AND COMMUNITY TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. THIS EXTENSION OF AN AGREMENT is made and entered into this day of October, 1987 by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California ("CITY"), and Community Transit Service, Inc., a California Corporation ("CONTRACTOR"). WITNESSETH Recital: 1. The CITY is the recipient of Proposition A Local Transit Return Funds. 2. The CITY has budgeted Proposition A Local Return Funds to administer transit programs. 3. CONTRACTOR and CITY have previously entered into an Agreement on the 23rd day June, 1987. Said extension shall be from October 15, 1987 through April 30, 1988. The previous Agreement is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as "Exhibit 1". NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: A. CITY and CONTRACTOR agree to enter into an extension of the previous Agreement which is attached hereto as "Exhibit A". Said extension shall run from October 19, 1987 through April 30, 1987. The CONTRACTOR agrees to run a fixed -route transportation service. B. The maximum price to be paid by CITY to CONTRACTOR shall not exceed: 8 hours/day x $36.25 per vehicle service hour x 136 days ($40,000). C. The parties hereby agree that all terms consistent with this -2 -. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 extension shall not be extended throughout the life of the extension as found in the original contract which is attached in accordance with any competitive bid procedure initiated by the CITY. D. This Agreement and the underlying Agreement which is incorporated herein as "Exhibit I" shall be the sole and only contract between the parties. Any other agreements regarding this matter shall not be binding upon the parties. If there is a conflict between this extension and the previous contract which is attached hereto as "Exhibit I", this contract shall control. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first written above. ATTEST: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH A Municipal Corporation State of California CITY CLERK MAYOR APPROVED AS /8 'ORM: , COMMUNITY TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. �) A California Corporation TY ATTORNEY �� j / ;%' , PRESIDENT 4 "EXHIBIT I"• SERVICE AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this day of , 1987, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Community Transit Services, Inc'., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR". WITNESSETH -•"'j�=�" - WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR has the management and technical --personnel, expertise, and other assets useful for the support of : • the CITY'S • He.rmosa Commuter Bus and - WHEREAS, the CITY is desirous of obtaining such services for said project for an interim period until a permanent contractor is hired; and WHEREAS,. CONTRACTOR is desirous of providing such services; s NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the. foregoing recital and covenants and agreements of each of the parties herein set forth, the parties hereto do agree as follows: - 1. Purpose: The CITY hereby contracts with CONTRACTOR to provide transportation management and operations services upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. . 2. Scope of Work: CONTRACTOR will provide the services to be rendered as set forth in Exhibit "A" (Scope of Work), attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof, said Scope of Work is hereinafter referred to as Basic Services in this contract, or by proposal drafted by winning bidder as amended. - 3. Contract Start: -The start of the Agreement shall be Dctobe 1987 .CONTRACTOR ---.commenced service operations ofCITYrS 1termma9 -:Commuter Shuttle on November 24, 1986 and shall terminate with at. least 30 days notice from the CITY. • 4. Maximum Obligation: The CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR in consideration for its services as described herein. The maximum price to .be .-paid .._by -.the .CITY_to.__.CONTRACTOR shall not exceed: 8 "hours/day x $ -25./hour x 136--days040,000) Tfor services as set forth in Exhibit _"A" (Scope of Work) for the term of the }=- ;. contract except as specifically provided in paragraph 14 entitled "Changes". • - * K 5. Price Formula: The CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR for performance of the services set forth in this Agreement as . follows: • c a. Payment of a fixed rate of $36.25 pervehicle service hour. Vehicle service hours will be computed by using the time each vehicle leaves the garage for its first route starting point each day and until such time as each vehicle returns to the garage at the end of each operational day and/or route excluding time for driver breaks. The hourly rate shall includevehicle operators' direct and indirect wages; vehicle operators' non -service wages; employees'.fringe benefits; overhead costs; bus washing and cleaning supplies;. uniforms; report reproduction; dispatch office supplies; radio maintenance; oil; project telephones; office; _garage and parking facilities; and all other related operational costs. -b.. The CITY shall provide marketing, tickets, passes, brochures, and related collateral materials. 6. -Invoices: CONTRACTOR shall submit invoices to the CITY as follows: • a. Hourly costs shall be directly traceable by driver trip sheets and employee sheets, copies of which will be submitted with each monthly invoice to the CITY. b. Charges for extra services as authorized by the Agreement shall be billed monthly with charges and handling fees directly traceable to receipts, bills, etc., copies of which shall be attached to the invoice. Each such statement shall contain a certification that all amounts billed are in accordance with the Agreement. _ 7. Payment: All payments by the CITY shall be made in arrears, after the service has been provided. Payment shall be made by CITIES no more than thirty (30) days from the CITY's receipt of invoice. If the CITY disputes any items on an invoice for a reasonable cause, the CITY may, deduct that disputed item from the payment, but shall not delay payment for the undisputed portions. The amounts and reasons for such deletions shall be documented to CONTRACTOR within thirty (30) working days after • receipt of invoice by the CITY. The CITY shall assign a sequential reference number to each deletion. Payments shall be by voucher or check payable to and mailed first class to: - t:> -Accounts Receivable. _ • • • 8. Operating Revenues: All operating revenues collected by CONTRACTOR are the property of the CITY. Operating revenues ' include, but are not limited to, all fares, sales of tickes and passes, advertising sales-, and.rental of equipment. They shall be counted and kept separately under appropriate security. Once . a week, or more frequently if so directed by the CITY, reports on the revenues collected and deposited shall be provided to the "-1,- CITY. Any shortage in operating revenues are the responsibility .` the CONTRACTOR Such shortage will be deducted from the CONTRACTORS' S billings . =` �� so? 9. Extra Services: Extra services, such as a charter and promotional services will be provided by CONTRACTOR upon prior. written authorization by the CITY's authorized representative at the hourly rate -of $54.25. All extra services shall be provided in addition to basic services as defined in.Exhibit "A", -and costs shall be treated as a change to -this Agreement as defined under ."Changes" and shall be in excess of maximum price defined as "Maximum Obligation" (paragraph 4) herein. 10. Control: :.a. All services to be rendered by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement shall be subject to the control of the CITY. - = CONTRACTOR shall advise the CITY of matters of importance and - make recommendations when appropriate; however, final authority shall, rest with the CITY. b. 'The CITY shall not attempt to directly discipline or terminate CONTRACTOR employees. The CITY may advise CONTRACTOR of any employee's inadequate performance which has a negative effect on the service being provided, and CONTRACTOR shall take prompt action to remedy the situation. In extreme case, the CITY may demand removal of a CONTRACTOR employee, and CONTRACTOR shall effect removal immediately. . 11.. Management: During the term of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall provide sufficient executive and administrative personnel - as shall be necessary and required to perform its duties and i::._ obligations under the. terms hereof. 12. Medical Assistance to Passengers: CONTRACTOR'S employees shall not be required to perform any medical or quasi=medical functions for passengers. In the event of a medical emergency, . driver shall notify dispatcher immediately by radio. Dispatcher • shall call 911 and direct medical/emergency services to location•. of bus. - 13. Uniforms: CONTRACTOR shall purchase uniforms for": employees and shall require the employees to wear them. The design, type and logo of the uniforms shall be subject to CITIES' :.: approval. • 14. Changes: In the event of changes, the CITY shall promptly :�;t_:?: notify CONTRACTOR in writing by change order. Compensation in excess of "Maximum Obligation" shall be allowed for under "Extra - -"- Services" as defined in paragraph 9. Any changes in Basic - services shall be subject -to subsequent negotiation. Compensation for changes shall be in addition to the "Maximum . Obligation". • ,r. cc C -15.---.Qualification for Future Contracts:' As a result of • having entered into this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall not be in- hibited, penalized, or disqualified from bidding subsequent -transportation, management, and operation programs under the jurisdiction of the. CITY. . • - • 16.• Succession: CONTRACTOR shall not assign this Agree- - • went, in 'whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the CITY. • 17. Disputes: -Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to the provisions of this Agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be .settled by arbitration at the election of either party in accor- dance with the Rules of the American Arbitration Association and - judgement upon the award rendered by the arbitrators may be en- tered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. .- -- • ' The losing parties shall bear the cost of any arbitra- tion proceeding or judicial action commenced hereunder, such cost to include without limitation the arbitrator's fees, attorney's. fees, incurred by the prevailing party, as well as other rea--- onable costs incurred by the prevailing. party. - -b.--The Federal Procurement Regulations shall be used where applicable to define, resolve, and settle procurement issues. - . 18. Stop Work: • CITIES may stop work on CITY's. - transporta- tion -system upon forty-eight (48) hours written notice to CON- TRACTOR. The CITYshall be liable forrall relevant costs incurred _ prior to the stop -work period and for restart, .if any. The CITY shall be obligated for the costs of severance for personnel as- signed to CITY'.s Transportation system in accordance with the -- published policy and procedures of CONTRACTOR. Additionally, the . cost associated with operations and facilities close down shall be the obligation of the CITY. . -CONTRACTOR shall. make all rea- sonable efforts.to minimize costs to the CITY. 19. Termination: • ••a. The CITY mayterminate this Agreement upon •thirty (30) - days'. written notice to CONTRACTOR and shall be liable for hourly. costs for operations during that 30 day period and all costs ref- erenced in Article 19.- In the event the Agreement -is terminated, all pertinent data prepared for the project shall be made avail- able to CITY . without additional cost. Should Proposition A funds become unavailable, -CITY nay terminate this Agreement immediately. _ . n C • delinquency or if the parties do not agree to arbitrate the dis- -.pute under the provisions of this Agreement, -then CONTRACTOR maysuspend operations without further notice or penalty on the dateindicated on the notice. 20. Communications:.. All notices hereunder and communica- tions with respect to this Agreement shall be effective upon the mailing thereof by registered or certified mail, return receipt :requested, and postage prepaid to the persons named below: . If to CONTRACTOR: Contract Administrator ---. - If to • Transit Coordinator City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive •• Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 21. Information and Documents: All information, data, re -- --ports, records, maps, survey results as are existing, available, and necessary for carrying out the work as outlined in Exhibit A - hereof, shall be furnished to CONTRACTOR without charge by the - CITY and CITY -shall cooperate in every way possible in the car- rying out of the work without undue delay. -22. Proprietary Rights: All inventions, improvements, dis- coveries, proprietary rights, patents, and copyrights made by CONTRACTOR under'this Agreement shall be made available to CITIES with no royalties, charges, or other costs, but shall be owned by . CONTRACTOR. All manuals prepared by CONTRACTOR for use by CON- TRACTOR in other locales shall not be copied, disclosed, or released by CITY- or CITY's representative or participating organization without prior written consent of -CONTRACTOR. Re- ports and manuals prepared by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement for -specific use in the CITY -transit system shall become property of CITY. CONTRACTOR,'however, shall have the right to print and issue copies of these reports. CONTRACTOR may make presenta- tions and releases relating to the project. Papers and other formal publications shall be approved by CITY . before they -are released. - 23. Emergency Procedures: In the event of a majoremergen- cy, such as an earthquake, or man-made catastrophe, CONTRACTOR shall make transportation and communication resources available to the degree possible for emergency assistance. If the normal line of direct authority from CITY': is intact, CONTRACTOR shall follow instruction of CITY. If the normal line of direct au- thority is broken, CONTRACTOR'shall maka.Ythe best use of transportation resources following to the degree possible the direction of an organization such as the police, Red Cross, or National Guard, which appears to have assumed responsibility. Emergency uses of transportation may include evacuation of in- jured, and movement of people to food and shelter. :CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed in accordance with the normal "Price Formula"F:�, and "Payment" or, if the normal method does not cover the types of emergency services involved, then on the basis of fair, equi-: table, and prompt reimbursement of CONTRACTOR'S • actual: costs. 1! ._'�°"_•:. :.::.:. '•'r.i:�:. i •-.:r.. amu.�-�e.°�??!:'•6^1w� �;4a•' •iy�:,"riN 's.•a Y• : hi- #'C. •.i 1Ys.• • cc 'Reimbursement for such major emergency service shall be over and .above "Maximum Obligation" of this contract. Immediately when the emergency condition ceases, CONTRACTOR shall reinstitute nor- -mal transportation service. 24. Audit:. CONTRACTOR shall permit the authorized rep- 'Yesentatives of CITY ., ..the U.S. ;Department . of Transporta- "tion,the Comptroller General of the -United States and the Cal- *ifornia State Controllers' office, and the Los Angeles County 'Transportation Commission to inspect and audit all data and records of the contractor relating to performance under this Agreement. • " 25. Transnortation Data Reporting: CONTRACTOR shall report transportation data to CITIES in accordance with requirements of CITIES as specified in Exhibit "A". 26. Licenses: Any franchise or business license fees that- -"'CITY might ordinarily require for operation in accordance with this Agreement are hereby expressly waived by CITY. . •• - -27. •Workers' Comrensation : CONTRACTOR certifies that it is aware of the provisions of the Labor Code of the State of Cal- ifornia which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and it certifies that it will comply with such provisions before com- mencing the performance of the work of this Agreement. " • "28. Liability Insurance: Throughout the term of this -Agreement CONTRACTOR shall name CITY as an additional insured on a five million dollar combined single limit coverage General 'and Auto Liability policy, covering all operations of the insured or contractors or subcontractors or anyone acting on their behalf .* -under .the contract whether:liabili'ty is attributable to the in- - .sured or the •.CITY;. excepting sole negligence of the CITY (To include the elected officials, appointed officials, and em- :ployees.)..Said Liability policy shall indemnify and save harm- _ _less the CITY •against any and all claims, including but not limited to any injury, death, loss or damage as a result of wrongful or negligent acts or omissions by CONTRACTOR. This hold -harmless assumption on the part of the underwriters shall include gall costs of investigation and defense, until reasonable deter - .urination is made that the CITY: are solely negligent. CONTRAC- TOR shall provide evidence of 'such insurance policies. --Such policies may not be cancelled without 30 days written notice to • hereunder .for. .CITY , or any liability other than provided for in this Agreement. CITY shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any CONTRACTOR employee or subcontractor for injury or sickness aris- ing out of his/her employment, or for any negligent actions of CONTRACTOR or its employees. _ All persons employed in the performance viOes and _ functions shall be employeesofCONTRACTOR and, as asrsuch, shall not for any purposes be consideredemployees of -CITY- and there -- fore shall have no right to any CITY • service , civil service, or other CITY; 'status. • w 30. Nondiscrimination: •-- a. In connection with the execution of this Agreement, CON- TRACTOR shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant' for employment because of age, race, religion, color, sex, or. national origin. CONTRACTOR shall take affirmative actions to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during their employment, without regard to their'age, race, religion, color, sex, or national origin. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotions or transfer; recruitment or recruitment ad- vertising; layoff or termination; rate of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. . 1 • b. CONTRACTOR shall also comply with the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) and with all applicable regulations,=statutes, laws, etc., promulgated pursuant to the civil rights acts of the state and federal government now in existence or hereafter enacted. Further, CON- TRACTOR shall also comply with the provisi the California Labor Code. ----s or Sections 1735 of 31. Minority Business Enterprise: In connection with the' performance of this contract, CONTRACTOR will cooperate with the ..::CITY in meeting any of CITY , commitments and goals with regard to the maximum utilization of minority business enterprises and will use its best efforts to ensure that minority business enter- prises shall have the maximum practicable opportunity to compete for subcontract work under this Agreement. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAYOR _:►-.....;. _ . ,.. -ATTEST: CITY CLERK • APPROVED: CITY ATTORNEY DATE COMMUNITY TRANSIT SERVICES Walter R. L. Diangson Vice President c • r • << c • '"EXHIBIT A" BASIC SERVICES (SCOPE OF WORK) -r CONTRACTOR shall provide the necessary management and administra- �•.�x�w :•.: .•• tive personnel whose expertise will assure efficient operation of the service specified herein. All Facilities, equipment, supplies and services required in the operation .of the 'HER- • MAN Commuter Bus transportation service will be furnished.by CON- TRACTOR . Service shall be managed by CONTRACTOR in accordance- . with the guidelines and parameters established herein and the attachments hereto. CONTRACTOR shall strive at all times to provide service in a man - n er which will maximize productivity and at the same time provide -.- high quality passenger service. .CONTRACTOR and CITY shall periodically meet to evaluate perfor- _mance of the program. CONTRACTOR:may be asked to recommend ser- vice improvement modifications for the Beach Cities Commuter Bus • service. SUPERVISION Supervision of THE Hermosa Commuter Bus TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM day- to -day operations will be vested in CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR shall assign an individual to this operation, and said individual shall show by decision and action to be competent in all aspects of the • .X t!• _'L: •'`fir%: �. .. .+. h 'r: :t.'i :-Sym; - r•r.. i;. Hermosa Commuter Bus TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM. The assigned individual or a designee selected by CONTRACTOR shall be available by -phone or in person during all hours of the operational day to make decisions or provide coordination as necessary. ADVERTISING/PROMOTION -•CONTRACTOR shall provide . distribution of advertising and promotional materials. CONTRACTOR shall make all materials available on board vehicles for any passengers using or desiring to use Hermosa Commuter Bus The CITY will coordinate with the CONTRACTOR and will provide or arrange to provide materials for use. TRAINING/SAFETY CONTRACTOR shall maintain on-going training procedures which will train .and prepare all newly hired and current drivers, maintenance personnel, administration, management, etc. in a • manner that conforms with all state and local laws and assures that CONTRACTOR'S employees will perform all obligations stated' in this Agreement. A safety program shall be implemented by -- CONTRACTOR and appropriate manuals will be provided by CONTRACTOR to its personnel. The CITY is not responsible for driver training or the driving performance of drivers. If inadequacies are found • • in the performance of drivers, etc., the Lead Agency may request ' additional training be carried out •or that the employee be removed from the Hermosa Commuter Bus project. ' - , 9'n;K;; • • Upon request, CONTRACTOR shall supply PP Y CITY with CONTRACTOR'S personnel policies including reimbursement policies for any sick pay, overtime pay, and wage scales. A list of current personnel - shall be maintained. CONTRACTOR'S personnel policies shall be in conformance with state and federal raws. ACCIDENT REPORTING In the event of a traffic accident or a serious passenger incident, CONTRACTOR shall notify the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH by telephone immediately and prepare all reports as may be required by the appropriate insurance company. Copies of accident reports shall be transmitted to the CITY no later than 24 hours after'the incident occurs. All applicable state laws shall be complied with in the case of any accident. DATA COLLECTION/REPORTING Information concerning vehicle activities shall be collected for the • Hermosa Commuter; Bus program and provided to the CITY on a monthly - basis: Such forms are required by the CITY to fullfill requirements for Proposition A funds. An operations summary of each service day including passenger counts by CITY shall be maintained and transmitted in completed form to the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH each month with the operations summary. A summary of each month shall be forwarded to the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH designated representative(s) when complete. The monthly summary may be of CONTRACTOR'S design with approval of the CITY. Any and all missed trips will be recoreded and - -=;1. I In no event shall the monthly .• ..:,74=- ' or unavailable to the CITY OF ' '='.'S accompanied by an explanation. summary reports be incomplete 4 • HERMOSA BEACH later than te., fln\ calendar days after the ...,d of the operating month - CONTRACTOR shall be required to complete origin and destination of passengers on a daily basis. This -monthly report shall include critique and evaluation of the system and service,along with ,,recommended corrective action when appropriate. Problems will be highlighted along with suggested solutions. The monthly report shall_ summarize the daily operations information and shall be forwarded within ten (10) days of the reporting month. ACCOUNTING f All costs incurred in furtherance of this Agreement shall be recorded in accounts separate from those used for other business activities and in conformance with the State of California, State Controller's Chart of Accounts for Public Transit Operators and r.�.. the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission's Proposition A Guidelines. All accounts will be available for inspection and/or independent audit at CITY'S election. LIAISON CONTRACTOR shall cordinate closely with the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH on all commuter bus program matters and operations status. - INVOICES 4 OPERATIONS' CONTRACTOR shall provide all personnel necessary to operate vehicles in service. Hermosa Commuter Bus drivers must be knowledgeable on fares, equipment, passenger service requirements and the street network in the service area. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for the mechanical conditions and cleanliness of all vehicles or any substitute or back-up vehicles. CONTRACTOR shall :.a -not assign any vehicle into service where the performance of a component part is likely to cause damage to other components, jeopardize public safety, or be contrary to the California Vehicle Code. CONTRACTOR shall not deploy any vehicle into service when its•.appearance is contrary to the :CITY'S standards. - The CITY may periodically inspect service vehicles during regular business hours. HOURS OF OPERATION/HOLIDAYS Service shall be based upon five (5) days per week operation. This weekday service is to be scheduled as follows: Weekdays: Monday Friday: 6:30 -a.m. run) and 4:00 p.m. - 6:00 --p.m. (evening run) . • - 8:30 a.m. - (morning There are six (6) holidays as designated by CITY each year when the service will not be in operation: _1t - New Year's Day, Memorial 4th of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. No Saturday or Sunday service will be provided by the Hermosa Commuter Bus Program. The Cities reserve the right to make ad- justments to the service schedule as needed. SERVICE AREA (Route Map Attached). The Hermosa Commuter Bus will travel through the Cities of Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach into the El Segundo Employment .area, as depicted in the attached route map. The 'CITY reserves the right to make changes in the service area as seen fit for fiscal, jurisdictional, geographic or passenger travel patterns, and'for reasons of coordination with other area operators. SERVICE ADHERENCE If at any time during the period of the contract CONTRACTOR is L. found to be unable to complete the service schedule due to short- age of drivers or vehicles, or for other such reasons, CONTRACTOR shall notify .CITY immediately. The CITY may then require the CONTRACTOR to find appropriate supplemental services or the CITY may elect to secure the necessary service elsewhere; in either 'case, replaced service shall be at the expense of the CONTRACTOR. VEHICLES Service will be provided with CONTRACTOR -supplied vehicles. Vehicles supplied by the CONTRACTOR are subject to approval by the CITY . All vehicles shall be equipped with 2 -way radios for • trr contact with dispatcher. Radios shall always be kept in good working order. All vehicles are to be in exceptional exterior and interior condition. Signage and paint may be negotiated upon award of this contract. Cost of signage and paint would be the responsibility of the CITY . Vehicles shall be of a quality attractive and comfortable to the commuting public. The CITY -_ .•:ti:_:-••• -. reserves the right to request and receive additional tripper service if necessary, within a reasonable time, from CONTRACTOR. Vehicles used for this service must be equipped with air conditioning and have comfortable commuter compatible rather than standard transit seating. Vehicles shall be equipped with locked fareboxes to accommodate passengers paying cash.. DISPATCH CONTRACTOR shall• -provide the personnel necessary to schedule and deploy drivers and vehicles in accordance with the Service Schedule. This activity will include the arranging of driver reliefs and replacement of failed vehicles when and if necessary: -A local telephone -number must .be available for communication • •between CONTRACTOR'S manager and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. FARES The CITY. has determined •that the fare will be fifty cents ($.50) one-way any place along the service route. Fares shall be collected by CONTRACTOR and paid to the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH on i •3 a monthly basis. Monthly passes and multi -ride tickets may be developed by the CITY and operated by the CONTRACTOR. MAINTENANCE •r All maintenance and repair of CONTRACTOR vehicles must be completed to manufacturer's specifications or to normal repair standards, whether performed by CONTRACTOR or an organization subcontracting to CONTRACTOR. The CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH will be .informed of all sub -contractors relating to the Hermosa Commuter Bus Service. - CLEANING Vehicle interior cleaning will be done on a daily basis. Vehicle exterior will be washed 'and scrubbed a minimum of two times per week, as well as after each rain. The CITY shall monitor - vehicles cleanliness. If vehicles do not meet mutually agreed standards, CONTRACTOR will have one (1) week to remedy the situation. After such time, the CITY . may elect to have vehicles cleaned and deduct such -charges from -CONTRACTOR'S billings. DAILY MAINTENANCE. Driverswillinspect the vehicle prior tabeginning daily service for.noticeable defects. If the driver finds a problem with the vehicle, he/she will note the comments on an operator's defect report. - • V ' action taken on items noted on this report prior to operation of the vehicles. Records of Daily Checkouts shall be maintained in compliance with California Highway Patrol requirements. PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE Preventive maintenance inspection shall be performed at regular "-=;:': intervals. A final determination of intervals of maintenance • inspection shall be made by the lead agency when executing the contract with selected operator. The work performed at each --inspection shall be in conformance with work ,specified on .:the CONTRACTOR'S preventive maintenance inspection report. Records of preventive maintenance shall be in compliance with California Highway Patrol requirements. REPAIRS A11repair work must be performed by maintenance personnel who - have demonstrated experience and training in the work to be done. Maintenance personnel will have the necessary equipment and tools to perform any authorized work. If work is subcontracted, lead '..;. agency shall be informed of the subcontractor, as provided for in • the section titled Maintenance. PARTS and MATERIALS For purposes of this Agreement, gasoline (fuel), fluids, oils, lubricants, repair parts and software (nuts, bolts, springs, • 41. bulbs, etc.) are part of the vehicle's operating costs and will be supplied by CONTRACTOR. • ROAD CALLS and BACK-UP SERVICE In the event of a vehicle failure while in service, CONTRACTOR *shall deploy a back-up vehicle, immediately upon notification, to replace the failed vehicle. DATA COLLECTION and REPORTS • • • The need for maintenance or repairs shall be collected on some . type of a Trouble Card, Operator's Vehicle Defect Card, or Preventive Maintenance Card of the CONTRACTOR'S choosing. Once it has been established that maintenance or repair work is required, work must be completed in a timely manner. When work is complete, a useful description of the work performed will be documented in CONTRACTOR records and included in monthly operation summaries to the CITY. • 5- ..• • • „ • • • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: POLICY STATEMENT NO. 87-1 LOCATION: CITY-WIDE INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation October 6, 1987 Regular Meeting of October 13, 1987 . . Confirm the' attached COMMiSSion:' recommended-ollby. regarding definition of a restaurant for parking purposes. Background The Planning Commission, at their September ,1; 1987meeting, ,,adopted ,the, subject POli,by Statement .;87-1,.and,direbted Staff. to 'fl3tPRare.a,1110.re..pr4be.V9finitibri. :sx101 as 8661,1:ti, ice reags, for t1e Zor1ihg Orinanqe ,, ' • , Ai•• • Abstract' This Policy Statement allows Staff to make determinations as to what constitutes a restaurant vs similar uses. It also serves as an interim standard until Staff has studied the matter thorughly and prepared a Text •Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. Analysis Refer to attached Staff Report to Planning Commission for more analysis. Attachments 1. Policy Statement 8771 2. ' Planning Commissibn Minutes CUR: 'Gayle . Martin.: • Ibterim City Manager; ' • , . . . • .;•. • f lly subyttq, 7 • • 4 .—Michael'-.Schubach- Planning Diretor .;• lq bl••)• 1 ,•• '• • 1•• •/V• iS.-0/Y :•Y r .0.0'0,', /1;0, 0 f a If 1•••:/ '400 1 r410,'A •..)1.‘0.',/,i?"•••›Pq irl'”.4•1•3•11 ;:i,...)74,4•;6rAPtv) y•r, k f 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2'4 25 26 27 28 P.C. POLICY STATEMENT 87-1 A POLICY STATEMENT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING THE DEFINITION OF WHAT CONSTITUTES A RESTARANT FOR PARKING REQUIREMENT PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered this matter on September 1, 1987, and made the following Findings: 1. The Zoning Ordinance does not define the difference between a .restaurant ,and "snack shop",.•. e%g. ,yogurt, ,.`ice•cream, .,etc . ; 2. Parking requirements are more intensive for restaurants than for "snack shops"; • . ,NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning: ,Commi;ss•ion; of; the . C .ty of ;: ieDmpsa $each m`ak'es' \t,h ', oh' o1w'n '"s '•.S:t.atement,. ;::of • ,.P,oli;c . regardingthe d'ef. ni"tion" of 'r�esta irant . >-.-1-. i , :Y•. ,4. , Ar ' . >;,; "�. . SECTION '1. A restaurant shall be defined as a business that has either of the following characteristics: A. An establishment thatserves breakfast, lunch, or dinner, or all meals. B. An establishment with kitchen facilities capable of producing full meals, which constitute breakfast, lunch, or dinner. VOTE: AYES: Comm.Compton,Rue,Chmn.Sheldon NOES: None ABSENT: , Comm.Pierce ABSTAIN:' None' CERTIFICATION j I hereby.certify .'that P.C. Pplicy Statement 87-1 is a true and complete record 'hof the `actiontaken by the' Planning, Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, Ca_iforpia at their,regu,l`ar meeting of September 1, 198=7 c ' Chuck. Sheldon, • •Cha;irman :, • fol Date �iMi if e1'Schub�ch, S,ecretar. . 1y1;,r• P.C. v3• 1.. t)r.<.) J•'.;t, ,,, - 1 - t rt,• y,l o•/•.AW, ..a•r,t 1,V)i•!rW:,Itd'7411,410 +,.{•);,?:';Y.p`»WOW Z. Or1)Y'tfi).0 411•.0 •:?.e�>', •(.l .r:.•i,?o n, •:` PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 1, 1987 PAGE 10 '1 . 3 • • .• •, ; .1" •'. ' • . 1 A.' '.•• • .; .s. • ‘,1 • ''1 1; . • ORDINANCE INTERPRETATION FOR•PARKINGREQUIREMENT PURPOSES, DETERMINATION AS TO WHAT CONSTITUTES A RESTAURANT Chmn. Sheldon stated that a taff rePcrt was . ', . ). :'',. •'. ' ?• . . • • • ' Mr.:Schubach stated%that there are two ice:cream,and2yogurt'shops.lthat haye come before,the•staff,'and those as0d :.f:thW,cbUld sell:other,i'tems' ..., %. besides the ice cream and, yogcartheYtalr4ady.,%sellThe first apPILican' . . is a•Mr. %hie a 901.HermoSa6enue*whidh is no.W.:a.ddfUncf.:ydgurshop:. ,;.?... ', • : • , He:.Wanted Tb,bedeclared.a. 4StaUrarkbecauSe he has 80pl'of: theetluipment:' :Therefore,. 't -ie -feels thatherha'A the .faCilities to ell other'IfOods'besIdes the: yogurt. he sells at, the. present; -. .. .. •.. . . . ,. ' ,:. • • , .,.. . 4 P . order. Mr. Schubach stated that the 'other applicant, Mr. Vilai, of King Cone, 1401 Hermosa Avenue, sees herself not as being a restaurant but just a snack shop, and she would like to sell other foods because in thewintertime, she feels she does not get enough business through ice cream and yogurt sales alone. She would like to sell Teriyaki beef on a stick. f ,,f,r • s • 0? ri.')vAt• • ,r1 J A PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 1, 1987 PAGE 11 Mr. Schubach stated that Mr. Vilai doesn't want to put in an oven. She would like to be able to use a barbeque. She will need a vent for that barbeque, and she will need a permit. He stated that staff feels that there should be a definition given to distinguish between a bar, restaurant, snack shop, etc. He stated that one of the three things should prevail to be considered a restaurant: 1. That the shop have the capacity to serve breakfast, lunch, or dinner. 2. Or if the installation of kitchen equipment is capable of serving breakfast, lunch, or dinner. He also stated that the adequate amount of parking should be provided. Mr. Schubach stated that the ordinance 'should be refined'' azd •�projide 'a'def• inition' as to what constitutes a restaurant as'opposed to a bar or snack shop. Comm. Compton asked of Mr. •Schubach if the definition of "meal" includes sandwiches and salads, and whether or not that needs to be stated in the definition. , Mr ; Schubagh, stated that i the i11ole `section .should ..be ' red ined, and .maker. the fief?inibi obi' mdre {clear: i.,. ,. ,. t, , �f' r .�, ; !IP • t. ) Chmn.''Sheldon•wanted to know if' there'is'a'dfferent code for parking facilities for ice cream shops as opposed to restaurants. Mr. Schubach stated that there are certain requirements based on every 250 square feet. Comm. Rue wondered if there:.is a differentiation by a shop that has sit-down booths, i.e., number of booths or tables. Mr. Schubach stated that there could be a definition added to distinguish that fact. He stated that he felt it was okay to have some seating at a snack shop. Chmn. Sheldon wanted to know why there were two individual applications before the Commission. He wanted to know if the matters should be taken up together or separately.. -• 5 h 3. Mr. Schubach stated that whatever.,decision is' made,'it'is going 'to fit both of them or none of them. The determination is going to•by one made 'city '. wide. Churn. Sheldon wanted to makeat clear that they,arenot hearing individual cases, per, se,' but :rather. the Commission s Y'earing the•,cases swhiQh'•wer'e' present that ,.evening, which. will,be pr,eced,ents • foi any., future• oases :which <may' c'ome,. , ' , ,before the ,Commi'psion at' any oth'er time: He ;also :v�anted .'to make', it. clear , ' that they' are; interpreting an: already. existing' code. '. .. : ' ' ,.Mr. Lough stated• that• the. Commission'is not taking up the issue whetherr not on making .ppecif is determinat,lons, w,Y�ether•, .or' not this,, s or� shou]d o'oar ;•• should not be'a restaurant. The Commission is just making a general definition. Churn. Sheldon asked of Mr. Schubach if the Commission should take each applicant's testimony and restrict it to the general category of what should be a restaurant or testimony as to their individual circumstances. '..U;Jq,rinl9 i•)T.h,4%Y'$ ,, :.,. ..••3, .,'. rA',. t•01+.o J:•Y. ;'>, ,,'• /i'•$J)s irYr J/ r, i .?'ye)•i } l•��,..n i.1� 3., ,.�', •A • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 1, 1987 PAGE 12 Mr. Lough suggested that the Commission should take both into consideration. He stated to Chmn. Sheldon that the main purpose would be to make a general definition. Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Sheldon at 9:40 P.M. Greg Dahle, 3408, 229 Street, Torrance, addressed the Commission and stated that he had the premises for lease and a couple wanted to open a frozen yogurt shop. So they came to the City to get a business license for the sale of frozen yogurt. They were told that they would have to provide all.the health requirements,, and they were 'offered a .business license that • was • unrestricted.. ` -So'• he �werit •••` ahead and made the property ready to be used'by the new owners. He claims that the space is suitable for a restaurant. He stated that he previously had a license to operate at the time he sold the premises.to the new owner, and now he can't understand whythere : need be any type of definition when he had the go ahead in obtaining the business license prior. ,He had madeimprovements and has spent allot of money and' effort to get'.the ai] rolling. He: believes he obtained is, business -license in'August�, ; 1985.' •Mr. Dahle: -stated. that het 'c is' muo lsi?ke'the? obh3er appl' cant `does..-iin' ;that iri' tkie', w ri erti ne-, . . sales of •i;ce Crean ,and yogurt: are .noir`higt .: Therefore.,?; if something else, such as.hot iteMs.in the Wintertime, the business:could function at a normal rate. He basically feels that if a grill can be put in, he would be happy. He would really like to make this a restaurant. Comm. Rue was not clear as to the City Council allowing the yogurt store or a restaurant as a grandfather use after they passed the • parking restriction. ;S Mr. Schubach stated that when this applicant first came in, their business was going to be a restaurant, then it was a question whether he fell under the new parking standard. Then they defined the fact that he is not a restaurant, but a yogurt shop. As a yogurt shop, he doesn't fall under the same category as far as parking goes. Charlie, King Cone, stated that he has the same problem as Mr. Dahle in that during the wintertime business is not so good. He stated that his wife would like to put a barbeque in so, they can cook specialty'items during..the'winter -- i.e., Teriyaki sticks. He stated that the old owner told'him that his license would fall under a businessaicense. til Kevin Cody, 54 17th Ccurt, addressed•the Comiission on Charlie of King Cone's behalf and stated that he works down the street and stated that he felt.itdidn't matter if Charlie sells hot dogs, which: .Charliie , already sells, or; beef' ,sticks.. He also feels . that ,a vented 'grill would be a,`better, idea "for safety purposes. rPublic 'Hearing 4ilosed :by• Chmn.: Sheldon at 9:5+7 . D:M. ,. • Comm: ' Compton stated that the need to . make a :clear,, definition:. of ,what ' a', • , restaurant js He then read from a document stating that. a restaurant consists, of the following: •It serves breakfast, l:unoh, or dinner:` Another. would' be installation of kitchen equipment for producing full meals. 'Ahother. suggestion might be that in cases where there is a question regarding the C.U.P, condition the applicant so they could be no more than a snack shop. ''•,*i 7'+•t ta`.O:i4 Y.1',„7;S) q, a rt.y F>, � i ,?. 't•)., m, r0.F;‘ 1,,, '. ))'' 1.•W d if,') (4, 3P.a1J:»d•C))nh tq0`,9 :r d.P.w., N,`;4,h4W,Aij t.�: n•i}�ty'�.i', .2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 1, 1987 PAGE 13 Mr. Lough said that the Commission could most certainly make a definition, but if it didn't fit the criteria regarding the C.U.P., then you're delegating the staff quasi-judicial authority, which they should not have. Comm. Compton suggest that they make the definition somewhat open-ended. He also stated that another problem with this business space is that there is no adequate parking. Mr. Schubach stated that what they need to do is define the difference between snaek bar and restaurant and make it a conditional.use permit process to have a snack bar so that. the business owner •doesn't' dohvert 'the busi ne*5 •," into some other type of business. Chmn. Sheldon wanted to know that since King Cone wants -to use a barbeque and what they already have; would that constitute kitchen equipmeht. Mr Schubach stated no to that question. He discussed it with the Business and Licensing,< and felt that people 1411 start dookingFthings;.other thar}. that . whichh , wasr' specified iris tithe }G . 0: P • He" aLao ,stated : that ,a,'�way;; to''-solwel this, .Mould,' be >,by sp,ecif lca]ily; what.: thej1 c• an aid dannot ;$ell'. a Chmn. Sheldon then summarized what a restaurant is as follows: 1. An establishment that serves breakfast, lunch, or dinner. 2. Or has the kitchen equipment capable of producing full meals, which constitute breakfast, lunch, or dinner. If one were to fall into that category, he will have to supply adequate parking. He stated that.the Commission would have to add the category "Snack Bar,." And if one chooses the category of. snack bar, it would require a conditional use permit, which the Commission would condition that snack bar. Mr. Lough said that one could do that, but there is no category in the code right now that that needs a C.U.P. Staff would have to come back with a zoning amendment. Chmn. Sheldon stated that the main purpose is to define a restaurant and to ask, staff to come up with, a text„amendment, regarding a snack•bar. MOTION by Chmn. Sheldon, seconded, by' Comm. Rtie,. stating that• a definition of a restaurant be, one, that a business serve either breakfast, lunch, or dinner, or all; and, two,: has kitchen equipment capable of producing full meals, which constitute.breakfast, lunch, or; ding • • • t 'Churn'. Sheldon' felt that ,if'a person Came `a.nt� a'..business .with'a Similar: . ''business that he ' "is all; fora the permit, to b used iri the`' new business But ' to change business th ' t'� is• ramari'l yogurt shop i.ntd,' a, rostaurarit , he does not' favor it.; . ' • . Comm. Ruestated. 'that' the applicants; must apply for. a opnditiona7,,” use permit at a' later. date if . this goes , throwgh•,City.•, Counei-1 . Mr. Schubach stated that it wouldn't take too long to add the definition, but it takes a few months to go through the hearing process. .. .SIj.J y.6r,Yi f9 yk r;64. . rY >l it ,?. i f4., 7r:ry.:\Yr ;,n•. 'r7J TJ i,v1 r!>Hk^/J? • r}Cw'vi;w111.1,41,15.,0+1,1 e?n..;1P)}+>,''Ld1;8}4,+•-,tot ;;'?.4Y.,i',:�t:.;-,y§i,y'.ii ,.:: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 1, 1987 PAGE 14 On the MOTION, previously submitted, no objections; so ordered. MOTION by Chmn. Sheldon, seconded by Comm. Compton t� direct staff to prepare a text amendment to the zoning code regarding a snack bar added to the C.U.P. and redefine restaurants and meals. No objections; so ordered. Chmn. Sheldon stated that no one can do what they want to do with their business at this time until staff comes back with the text amendment and the permit worded correctly to apply to the particular businesses at hand. It could be six months. 17,.r-1xni, .'t'+i,vr a Also -;s 014,:.,t:it k1T,iat's.r ax�i, zinnyi">>if�a.4:',�•;il '%i' af�iYfhrt sr; i lEx:�c�y, October 6, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council October 13, 1987 SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS OTHER THAN LAND USE Recommendation Receive and file. Background The City Council has requested a status report concerning the existing General Plan Elements. Analysis ,Circulation, Parking• and Transportation: Revisipn,,to these. ;elements !is underway,_ and', shou�.d be !completed by ]DecOmber' ,of .'this, ear, > r . y b 1 • 's i..�` ��, .�:'.e ' 'c', + ., ;� {. ., .. Housibg Element: ' By State ' law, ' the houeing ''element 'requires updatingmore often than other elements; it is required at least every 5 years. The current element was adopted in 1983. A revision to this element should be accopmplished in 19887-- Other 988:Other Elements: The General Plan. :should, in general, be revised at least every 2Q years. The Cfty's current General Plan was completed in 1979. Until all the General Plan/Zoning inconsistencies in the City are resolved, Staff believes there should not be any major revisions except as required (Housing Element, 1988). NCUR: Gayl_/ T. Martin Inte im City Manager ”pe ully s b jzted Michael Schubach Planning Director AAA9) r ir • ,t. rrJ'irp,`,y�'11.)i,!.Y.lr,i�.'a: 1,ns ,.:,.f'''.. ,-a',ry tf ',., 4 r'>„r, act.,y.r.0i'vMi j) :4.,t YTv.at1:ori,{1Rnf!1»;+.9r,',W,4q%;W4)141yi'.,ali'a1Y'070v,p1 i,`i tiilh. +.:'a.e•J'i Yti't ��:ny.S�lr, •.t MINUTES SOUTH BAY CORRIDOR STEERING COMMITTEE Meeting of August 27, 1987 4525 Calle Mayor, Torrance The regular meeting of the South Bay Corridor Steering Committee at Filippone's Restaurant was called to order by Uice Chair Jim Cragin at 5:30 p.m. on August 27, 1987, until Chairman Hal Croyts arrived from Sacramento. Chairman Croyts arrived shortly after the meeting was called to order. In attendance were the following members: Betty Ainsworth, Hawthorne Ruth Gralow, Palos Verdes Estates Keith Schuldt, El Segundo Barbara Doerr, Redondo Beach Archie Snow, Redondo Beach Gordana Swanson, Rolling Hills Jim Cragin, Gardena June Williams, Hermosa Beach Hal Croyts, Lomita Also in attendance were the following: Tom Chung, RTD Lisa Breisacher, Hermosa Beach Sandra Learman, Rancho Palos Verdes Leah Jeffries, Supervisor Dana's Office Bob Hildebrand, Torrance Brice Stephenson, Coordinator Jim Lough, City Attorney, Hermosa Beach On motion of Gordano Swanson, seconded by June William, the minutes for the regular meeting of the South Bay Corridor Steering Committee on June 25, 1937, were approved unanimously. Brice Stephenson reported on the financial status of the Steering Committee as_of July 31, 1987. There is a balance of $2,215.61 in the Finance Department of the City of Torrance. A motion was made by Gordana Swanson, seconded by Betty Ainsworth, that the financial report be received and filed. It was approved unanimously. There was a discussion on the payment of bills incurred by the Coordinator for mileage, postage and dinners over the past several months. He was requested to submit appropriate billings at the next regular meeting of the Steering Committee. Lisa Breisacher of Hermosa Beach reported ori the Commuter Transportation Implementation Pian as sponsored by the cities of Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach, Los Angeles, Rancho Palos Verdes, Torrance, El Segundo and Lawndale. A consulting firm (EKistic) is reviewing the commuter programs of the various cities to determine the possibility of making them more effective collectively. Each of the above cities is contributing to the costs of the survey. lat Discussion was had on the future projects and goals of the Steering Committee. It was pointed out thut the Steering Committee as u Joint Powers Agency could act as the lead agency fo.r ongoing studies such us the commuter study mentioned above. It was also suggested that the Steering Committee has the authority to receive and expend funds from State and Federal agencies or from the LACTC. The possibility of the Steering Committee sponsoring u "South Bay Summit Transit Meeting" was discussed. Accordingly, Jim Cragin was appointed as the chairman of a subcommittee, assisted by Gordana Swanson, to worK on such a project in the near future. Chairman Croyts discussed the possibility of "combining" the Steering Committee meetings with the meetings of the South Bay Cities Association as one meeting on some occasions. The question of the legality of such joint meetings was discussed. The Coordinator was requested to checK with the City of Torrance regarding the legality of "joint" meetings. After discussion of several items of general interest, the meeting of the South Bay Corridor Steering Committee was adjourned at 6:50 p.m. October 1, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council NAME THAT PARK CONTEST RECOMMENDATION City Council Meeting of October 13, 1987 It is recommended by the Community Resources Commission that City Council approve the "Name that Park" contest for the new park located at 4th and Prospect as presented in this report. BACKGROUND On August 26, 1986, City Council referred the naming of the park at 4th and Prospect to the Community Resources Commission. On May 7, 1987, the commission approved the guidelines and procedures for a "Name that Park Contest" as listed in the analysis. The projected completion date for this park is March, 1988. ANALYSIS With the March 1988 completion date in mind, it is suggested that the "Name that Park Contest" take place in January, 1988. It is suggested the contest be approached via local newspapers (Easy Reader, Daily Breeze, Beach Reporter) with press releases and a photo of the site submitted to each one. The contest guidelines will be as follows: 1. Applicant must be a Hermosa resident. 2. Applicant submits name suggestion by deadline (Feb. 1, 1988). 3. Applicant includes reason for name selection. 4. All submittals will be reviewed by a screening committee composed of members of the Prospect Park Committee. 5. The screening committee will select (3) three names to be forwarded to the Community Resources Commission for final selection. 6. The commission will select "the winner" which will be forwarded to City Council for final approval. 7. The winner will receive a plaque at ribbon -cutting recognizing their achievement. Respectfully submitted, Mary '. i" on-•, oordinator Dept o' Community Resources Concur: Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources Gay T. Martin Int rim City Manager WILLIAM C. DUNE ERIN KENNETH W. THOMPSON 13Al2IHE ANDERSON DuNIiEB].Y, THOMPSON & ANDERSON ATTORNEY'S AT LAW 2276 •IORRANCE BOULEVARD TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90501 September 15, 1987 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Attention: KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk RE: My Client: JOHN FORSYTH Date of Accident: July 1, 1987 Dear Ms. Midstokke: AREA CODE 213 Thank you for your letter of September 1, 1987 in which you allege two deficiencies in my claim letter of August 19, 1987. I have once again reviewed Section 910 of the California Government Code, and I disagree with your interpretation that the previously filed claim was deficient. In any event, as to your request for further information concerning the circumstances of the occurrence, the accident occurred at approximately 1:00 a.m., and it was caused by employees of the City of Hermosa Beach negligently allowing and causing debris to be placed in the roadway, thus creating a dangerous condition, which proximately caused injury to Mr. Forsyth. It is impossible at this time to estimate any amount pertaining to the claim. Mr. Forsyth was severely injured, and he has been required to have surgery on his right knee. That is all the information available to us at this time, and it is clearly sufficient to meet the requirements of Section 910 (f) of the California Government Code. a WILLIAM C. I)UNKERIN I\ENNF:7 11 W. THOMPSON BARRI E V. ANDERSON DUNEERLI, THOMPSON & ANDERSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2276 I'ORRANCE BOULEVARD TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90501 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH September 15, 1987 Page Two AREA CODE 213 TELEPHONE 320-9742 Once again, I consider the claim of August 19, 1987 to be complete, but if you wish to treat this letter as an addendum thereto, you may, of course, do so. Kindly advise me of your actions in this matter. Very truly yours, DUNKERLY, THOMPSON & ANDERSON BY: KENNETH W. THOMPSON KWT/kd \V11.1.I.��1 f 1 N1 1 M.') ENN] "111 \\ I IU()M l•r,,N li:\Iti:t1 \ 1N1]F1.-( August 19, 1987 1)i xxEri_'•, 'l'llOMPSON t� ANDERSON 11'1 I o 1t N s71' 5 Al LAW 227(, 1111t12ANt'F 11O1'I.1 VAl:u 10 It AN( 1':. ('Aii1-01tN1A 1)C)501 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 RE: JOHN FORSYTH vs. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, et al. Date of Accident: July 1, 1987 Gentlemen: r0 Tr ti A1tLA CODE E 2.13 .I ]-.I.F.1'110NE 3:20-074'2 • ,• D, v J Please be advised that I represent John Forsyth in all respects concerning the below described accident. This letter is a Notice of Claim pursuant to Section 910 of the California Government Code. The claimant resides at 2301 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California, but all notices should be sent to my attention at the address shown on the letterhead above. The accident out of which this claim arises occurred on July 1, 1987 at Valley Boulevard between 19th and 20th Streets, Hermosa Beach, California. Through the negligence of an employee of the City of Hermosa Beach, Mr. Forsyth sustained severe injuries to his right knee and other parts of his body. The amount of the claim is unknown at this time. It will include, but not be limited to, compensation for medical expenses which have or will in the future be incurred, loss of earning capacity and general damages for pain, suffering, permanent disability and disfigurement, etc. Please contact me regarding this matter. Very truly yours, DUNKERLY, THOMPSON & ANDERSON BY;- KENNETH W. THOMPSON KWT/rk City of`Hermosa Tcaclt} September 1, 1987 Civic Center. 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Kenneth W. Thompson, Esq. Dunkerly, Thompson & Anderson Attorneys at Law 2276 Torrance Boulevard Torrance, CA 90501 Re: Claim for Damages John Forsyth Gentleman: Please take notice that the claim presented by you on August 20, 1987 fails to comply substantially -with the requirements of Government Code sections 910(c) Circumstances of the Occurrence, and (f) - Amount Claimed. We are, therefore, returning this claim as being insufficient due to the following insufficiencies: Section 910(c) - Circumstances of the Occurrence. The date, place and other circumstances of the occurrence or transaction (please describe accident or type of occurrence) which gave rise to the claim asserted. Section 910(f) - Amount Claimed. The amount claimed as of the date of presentation of the claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or loss, insofar as it may be known at the time of the presentation of the claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed. Very truly yours, (/a.*{_t_ze„ ?i(,;e/)-zxz KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE City Clerk Attachment cc: Robert Blackwood, Risk Management City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379-3312 / 376-6984 • Fire Department 376.2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 376-7981 / 376 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 87- 3-7 I O1'(•Z.VNtix1 ()VER(J ARD A LAV: CORFG :4- ..^•t. Lt tPE 57`C• -,E•?, Claimant MICHAEL A. TAFOYA Attorneyfor-- TA- royA ISrAC I. BELOW FOR FILING: STAMP ONLY, I i►drCEiVt\4 11 OCT 21997+. t -i City Ckrk f' City nf Mermos• NOTICE OF CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (GOV C § 905, 905.2 910, 910.2) TO THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: 7 rri Claimant, MICHAEL A. TAFOYA, hereby makes claim against the City of Hermosa Beach and makes the following statements in support of his claim: 1. Claimant's post office address is 3145 Olive Avenue, Fresno, California 93722 2. Notices concerning the claim should be sent to the Law Offices of Movius, Kopczynski & Overgaard, 1025 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 310, Glendale, California 91202. 3. The date and place of the occurence giving rise to this claim are July 21, 1987, at the City of Hermosa Beach Police Department, Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885. 4. The circumstances giving rise to this claim are as follows: At the above time and place, claimant was under arrest and was being detained at the City of Hermosa Beach Police Department, and during claimant's period of detention, claimant was assaulted and battered by numerous City of Hermosa Beach 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 police officers without provocation, and violently struck claimant numerous times in and about the face and body, causing him serious injuries. 5. Claimant's injuries, as of this date, are hemorrhaged retina of the right eye, bruised ribs, concussion, and numerous bruises on and around his head. 6. The names of the public employees causing the claimant's injuries are unknown at this time. 7. The amount of the claim as of this date is unknown due to continuing medical treatment and potential future medical cost. However, claimant will amend this claim when the same are ascertained. DATED: September 25, 1987 -= MOVIUS, KOPCZYNSKI & OVERGAARD A LAW CORPORATION NKI, t1' AeLe r ey on c e! i f of Claimant MICHAEL A. TAFOYA -2- ARREST REPORT 87-3366 ON 7-21-87 AT APPROX 0205HRS I WAS S/B HERMOSA AVE APPROACHING 2ND ST. I SAW A BRN CAD, CA LIC 100LUK, TURN E/B 2ND ST FROM S/B HERMOSA AVE, IN VIOLATION OF THE POSTED SIGN. I FOLLOWED THE VEH E/B ON 2ND ST AND NOTICED IT WEAVING WITHIN THE LANE. WHEN THE VEH TURNED N/B PCH I ACTIVATED THE OVERHEAD LIGHTS ON MY UNIT. THE VEH FINALLY STOPPED IN FRONT OF 518 PCH, PARTIALLY IN A RED ZONE AND PARTIALLY BLOCKING A DRIVEWAY. THERE WAS LEGAL PARKING BOTH IN FRONT OF AND BEHIND THE VEH. I CONTACTED THE DRIVER AND -SOLE OCCUPANT, TAFOYA, AND IMMEDIATELY SMELLED THE STRONG ODOR OF BEER ON HIS BREATH. HIS EYES WERE SLEEPY, DILATED, BLOODSHOT AND WATERY. HIS SPEECH WAS VERY SLURRED AND AT TIMES INCOHERENT. HE FUMBLED WITH HIS WALLET WHEN I ASKED HIM FOR HIS CDL. I HAD TAFOYA EXIT HIS VEH IN ORDER TO CONDUCT AN FST. WHEN HE STEPPED UP ON THE SIDEWALK HE LOST HIS BALANCE AND ALMOST FELL BACK INTO THE STREET. TAFOYA TOLD ME HE HAD AN EAR INFECTION AND WAS CURRENTLY TAKING CODEINE FOR THE PAIN. HE SAID HE TOOK A PILL APPROX TWO HOURS AGO. I LATER FOUND A PRESCRIPTION BOTTLE IN HIS NAME INSIDE THE VEH FOR APAP AND CODEINE 30MG. TAFOYA PERFORMED POORLY ON THE FST (SEE PAGE 2). I DID NOT CONDUCT A FULL FST BECAUSE I WAS CONCERNED THAT TAFOYA WOULD FALL AND INJURE HIMSELF. I ARRESTED HIM FOR DUI AND TRANSPORTED HIM TO THE STATION. HE COMPLETED A BREATH TEST (.21/.21) AND THEN BECAME UNCOOPERATIVE. TAFOYA REFUSED TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS OR SIGN THE TROMBETTA FORM. 077 Oa October 1, 1987 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of Regular Meeting of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL October 13, 1987 ACCEPTANCE OF WORK AS COMPLETE SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION TRACT 44073 LOCATED AT 446 MONTEREY BOULEVARD Recommendation It is recommended that City Council: 1. Accept as complete sanitary sewer construction for Tract 44073 located at 446 Monterey Boulevard. 2. Authorize the release the Subdivision Improvements Performance Bond and Subdivision Improvements Labor and Materials Bond. Background On July 24, 1986 the City and Tia -Yu Su entered into a Subdivision Agreement (Exhibit I) for Sanitary Sewers for Tract 44073 located at 446 Monterey Boulevard. Section 10 of the Agreement required the developer to submit a faithful performance bond and labor and materials bond for the estimated cost to perform the work. Bonds were posted and work began during May, 1987. The developer completed the work within the specified time frame. The developer was required to replace approximately 580 feet of 8 inch sanitary sewer with 10 inch pipe. This pipe was identified by the Santina & Thompson Sewer Deficiency report as a deteriorated 8" concrete pipe operation and in need of upgrading to 10' clay pipe to handle existing flow. This pipe segment was listed in the report as "priority no. 1". Analysis The sanitary sewer construction for Tract 44073 has been constructed according to the plans and specifications, inspected by the Public Works Department and accepted as complete. Therefore, it is recommended the Subdivision Improvements Performance Bond #9344235 and the Subdivision Improvements Labor and Material Bond ##9344235 be released. Bonding Company: Developers Ins. Co. 333 Wilshire Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 FISCAL IMPACT This developer provided improvements representing a $70,000 cost savings to the City. 1 lw SUMMARY The project was estimated in 1986 to cost nearly $70,000. As a result of this agreement with the developer the City received: 1. The upgrading of 580 feet of deteriorated 8" concrete sanitary sewer with a new 10" clay pipe. 2. A cost saving of nearly $70,000. Respectfully submitted: Gar -aton Engineering Technician Attachments: CO Ari p.. AlgtimW ayle f. Martin Interim -City Manager ony Anti h is Works ctor Exhibit I - Subdivision Agreement Exhibit II - Bonds 2 •:r CITY OF IeIRMoM T3�lfQld� CIVIC CENTER HERMOSA BEACH CALIF 0 R N I A 9 0 2 5 4 TI HALL:213) 3 3 7 6- 6 9 8 4 POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS: 3 7 6- 7 9 8 1 SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWERS FOR TRACT 44073 THIS SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), made and entered into on this at{. day of - ji& . , 1986, by the City of Hermosa Beach hereinafter rfe'erred to as "City", and Tc.i — 'u Su , hereinafter refered to as "Principal" do agree as follows. WHEREAS, on July 2, 1985 the City of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission adopted Resolution PC85-13 approving a .thirty-four unit condominium, Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map #44073, lofted -at 446 Monterey Boulevard.. WHEREAS, Condition 12 of Resolution PC85-13 requires the developer to "install approximately 580 lineal feet of sanitary sewer VCP", hereinafter referred to as "Project". WHEREAS, design and construction'will include relocation of, the sanitary sewer to the centerline of Monterey Drive, installa- tion of new manholes, reconnection of all lateral lines and repaving. WHEREAS, design of project shall, be_ iri accordance with ac- cepted engineering practice and subject to the review. and approv- al of the Public Works Director. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and Principal do'agree as follows: Section 1. Before beginning any construction work on the project, Principal shall apply .and obtain written approval of an excavation construction permit'from the Public Wor.ks.Director. Section 2. No construction activity shall be allowed on Public right-of-way from June 1, 1986 to September 1, 1986 Section 3. Monterey Boulevard shall be open to traffic at all times. One lane of traffic in each direction shall be main- tained at all times on Monterey Boulevard. Traffic may be re- stricted only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. and subject to review by the City Traffic Engineer. Excavations shall be backfilled or other adequate means provided to maintain existing traffic lanes other than during these hours. Traffic controls shall conform to the current State of California MANUAL OF WARNING SIGNS, LIGHTS AND DEVICES FOR USE IN PERFORMANCE'OF WORK UPON HIGHWAYS. Principal shall provide and maintain all such signs, lights, devices. Section 4. Sewage flow shall not be interupted. QTY F bfttW CIVIC CENTER HERMOSA BEACH 8e AKA/ CALIFORNIA 9 0 2 5 4 CITY HALL: (213) 376-6984 POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS: 3 7 6- 7 9 8 1 Section 5. No work on the sanitary sewer shall begin before 8:00-a.m. Section 6. All work shall be completed within.two years of the date of this agreement. All construction activity shall be completed within 90 calander days of the issuance by the Public Works Department of a Notice to Proceed. The Notice to Proceed shall include a completion. date. Section 7. In no event -shall the property be issued a cer- tificate of completion nor any utilities turned on until the sanitary sewer work has been completed and accepted as complete by the City Council. Section 8. The Principal shall -provide insurance to the City in a manner and amount acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. Said insurance _shall be a general, com- prehensive liability policy and shall name the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers and employees as additional insureds. Prin- cipal shall pay any deductable required thereunder, and said policy shall contain a provision requiring that the City be notified, by certified mail, at least thrity (30) days prior to any cancellation of said• policies. Liability limits under said policy must be at_One Million Dollars .($1,000,000) per occurance. Section 9. In the:_event the Principal fails to complete the project within the time'limits specified by the Notice to. Pro- ceed, the applicant shall pay liquidated damages to the City in the amount of $100 per calander day -fon each and every day ,beyond the completion date. Section 10. As required by the City Municipal Code, Section 29.5-11, and the Government Code Sections 66499.1 and 66499.2 the Principal shall submit both a faithful performance and labor and materials bond each for 100% of the estimated amount as shown on "Exhibit A". ATTEST: CI Y CLERK MAYOR of t7 APPROVED AS" TO FORM mes P. Lough ty Attorney City of Hermosa Beach, California DATED: 8-12-86, approved by City Council Action Date 2 - ,t9/ 7,/g -e<. •1VIMIlk inSCO The Insco/Dko Group BOND NO. 9344235 D C) INITIAL PREMIUM: 1, 387.00 C a l Z VCC C SUBJECT TO RENEWAL. SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we:That Yu Su as Principal, e and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State- V of California and duly licensed to conduct a general surety business in the State of California as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto c• 2 •City of Hermosa Beach Sixty s as Obltee, to the sum of Ni Thousand ousand Th Hundred und red Thirty and no/100-- 1 ($ 6g9,3.30.00 ) Dollars, for which payment. well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and successors, jointly and severally firmly by these presents. V res THE CONDITION OF THE OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT: C 44073 c l entered into an agreement or agreements with said Obligee to complete the improvements specified in C + C)C C.)C C IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the seal and signature of said Principal is hereto affixed and the corporate seal and the name of the said 13: WHEREAS, the above named Principal, as a condition of the filing of the final subdivision map of (Tract/Parcel) Map No said agreement or agreements. NOW THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such, that if the above Principal shall well and truly perform said agreement or agreements during the original term thereof or of any extension of said term that may be granted by the Obligee with or without notice to the Surety, this obligation shall be void, otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. i CORPORATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS Ann— l e s On July 22, '19A() SS DEO before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Carol Ann Rosenblum personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory W evidence) to be the person who executed the within instrument as Attorney- s Or in -Fact on behalf of Developers Insurance Company, the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. DIC 304 (REV. 2/85) � s �eAre?`.'.�i' JIB >eiTSJ,•� x'ry'1 �4J�1?Wti��; `'+i-)' t -t/ OFFICIAL SEAL BERNADETTE BARBER NOTARY PUBLIC . CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN • F LOS ANGELES COUNTY r My Cotnrnissloo Exp. Nov. 14. 1989 :2 • This area for Official Notarial Seal 19 $E_ _V C • 4 ney-in-Fact s•Y • .41risco ®®®oo /1 The sail ICS Grotp BOND NO. 934423S PREMIUM INCLUDED IN PERFORMANCE BOND. SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, Tai Su as Principal. and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California and duly licensed to conduct a general surety business in the State of California as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto -- City of Hermosa Beach as Obligee, in the sum of Sixty Nine Thousand Three Hundred Thirty and 00/100 (5 69,330.00 ) Dollars, for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs. executors and successors, jointly and severally firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT: WHEREAS, the above named Principal, has entered into an agreement or agreements which are made a part of this bond. with the City of Hermosa Beach -_ as Obligee for the improvements.in the subdivision designated as (Tract/ Parcel) Map No. 44073 as required by the Government Code of California. NOW THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such, that if the above Principal fails to make payment to any contractor, his subcontractors, or to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor and materials to them for the improvement required by said . agreement or agreements, the Surety on this bond will pay the same, in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond. This bond is executed and filed to comply with Section 66499 through and including Section 66499.10 of the Government Code of California as improvement security, and shall inure to the benefit of any and all contractors. their subcontractors and persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to them for the improvement. Notice of extension of time for completion is waived by the Surety. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the seal and signature of said Principal is hereto affixed and the corporate seal and the name of the said Surety is. hereto affixed and attested by its duly authorized Attorney -in -Fact at Los Angeles California, this 22nd day of July , 19 86 "SURETY" DEVEL Ir S INSURA CE COQ PANY R-� 7/�.� BY. arol Ann Rosenblum "PRINCIPAL" FORM IDI 12 REV. 9;84 333 Wilshire Ave. Anaheim, CA 92801 (714)999-1471 ' Attorney -in -Fact • 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Department of Public Woiks Sanitary Sewer Improvements 446 Monterey Blvd., Tract 44073 Cost Estimate u " E)(\ Vl A Cost 1. Design Cost -__(10% of construction costs) $ 4,150 2. Construction Cost Item of Unit of Unit Extended Work Quantity Measure Cost Cost a. Remove existing - 8 " dia pipe 580 LF $ 6 $ 3,480 b. Install 10" dia. vitrified clay pipe 580 LF 45 26,100 c. Remove existi g manhole frame and—cover. Seal existing inlets & outlets with concrete and backfill with sand. 1 ea 750 750 d. Construction of new manholes 3 ea 1,400 4,200 e. Connection of lateral house connections L.S. 1,500 1,500 f. Sheeting, shoring, bracing or sloping of trenches as required L.S. 2,500 g. Mobilization L.S. 10,000 h. Surveying L.S. 2,000 Subtotal Construction $41,530 3. City Inspection Cost (107 of construction) 4. Enforcement Costs (per government code secti_on.66499.4) 5. Administrative Costs (15% of above) 6/30/86 Mont Subtotal 10% Contingency 4,150 5;000 8,200 63,030 6,300 Total $69,330 1 . TT. ...1111"'.IT /1 October 6, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council October 13, 1987 SUBJECT: STATUS OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ENFORCEMENT INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Receive and file. • Background City Council requested a status report at their last meeting, September 22, 1987. Analysis Ihel "1?.1ning 0?er4IrtmerWS n07;staf7 Memberi TaidI; be';• pn board at ,, ;tiles, 'e5d ;df, )C)Ctober) ..At that t;Ime,1 ' Cbti'ditilnal‘:, Us r ,..11Ormit 'enforcement'will commence. ' .., , • NCUR: Gayl: T. Martin Interim City Manager r ' , • • • R5spect7fully7/suhmltte , Micha-01 Schubach Planning Director • .‘„ • , st , Jll $." .), October 5, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council October 13, 1987 SISTER CITIES TRIP RECOMMENDATION It is recommended City Council approve the following as the official portion of the Sister City visit scheduled for November 12-16, 1987: A. Presentation of appropriate gift by Mayor Cioffi to the Mayor of Loreto, cost not to exceed $100. B. That the City of Hermosa Beach prepare an appropriate Resolution to be presented to the Mayor of Loreto. C. That the City of Hermosa Beach arrange for a tour of Loreto's hospitals, schools and clinics to be attended by officials from both cities and any other Hermosa Beach citizen on the trip. BACKGROUND The City annually participates in this visit to our Sister City of Loreto. The adopted City Council budget appropriated travel funds in the amount of $500. Air fare and hotel for Mayor Cioffi to attend will be $318. ANALYSIS City staff will arrange for everything listed in the recommendation above. The tour of hospitals, clinics and schools was suggested by the Sister City Organization as they felt it would be much more interesting to see first hand the operations of those facilities. The Sister City Organization has also collected various items and gifts to give the hospitals and clinics. Gay ! T. Martin Interim City Manager Respectfully submitted Alana M. Mastrian Assistant City Manager lz October 7, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council October 13, 1987 SUBJECT: OIL EXTRACTION E.I.R. PROJECT DESCRIPTION INITIATED BY STAFF Recommendation 1. Direct the Public Works.Department and Planning Department to investigate and prepare a report including any environmental impact on the relocation of the City Yard. 2. On Page 3, modify 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence of Project Description to read as follows: "Relocation of the City Yard will be an addendum to the E.I.R. and will be prepared by the City Staff." Background The consultant, Ultrasystems, had accepted the project description as revised by the City but overlooked a statement on Page 3 which stated that "It is contemplated that the City Garage/Repair and Animal Control/Holding facility will be relocated off-site. Relocation mitigations will be addressed in the E.I.R." Analysis At the time that the R.F.P. for preparation of the E.I.R. for oil extraction at the City Yard was prepared, relocation of the City Yard -was not contemplated, and therefore, was not included in the R.F.P. Ultrasystems subsequently did not make a proposal which included relocation of the Yard. This problem occurred because of the demand for an E.I.R. by the State Lands Commission prior to requesting bids for the oil extraction. The commission made the City put the "cart before the horse" and hence, the Staff, not knowing what exactly the oil purveyor would need in terms of land, did not consider the removal of the City Yard. This problem was discovered after the City requested bids for drilling directly down and not into the tidelands. McPherson Oil, the only bidder, has now provided a project description which includes not only drilling directly down, but also slant drilling into the tidelands. The amount of land necessary according to the description will result in the relocation of the Yard. iaa % It should be noted that the City discovered the "loophole" to go around the State Land Commission, i.e. request bids for drilling directly down only, after the the R.F.P. had already been accomplished and the consultant hired. ayle/ Martin Interim City Manager Resp-ctfu. sub.. i1. /. I' Michael . " ac I Planning Directo 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION [City Yard] 2.1 Statement of Objectives The applicant proposes to initially drill three exploratory oil wells from the City (Hermosa Beach) yard. Upon successful production and testing (for 3-9 months) of these three wells, the applicant proposes to drill up to 9 (total) oil wells from the City yard site. The wells Will be directionally drilled and completed either onshore or slant drilled to tidelands (bottom hole locations) at an approximate vertical depth of 4000± feet. 2.2 Location and Boundaries The proposed oil drilling and production site of one acre which is located on the 1.3± -acre existing maintenance yard for the City. The drillsite is located at 555 Sixth Street at the northwest- intersection orthwestintersection of Valley Drive at Sixth Street in Hermosa Beach. Figure 1 shows the regional and vicinity location of the site. The drillsite will be accessed via drives located along Valley Drive and Sixth Street. Regional access will. be Pacific Coast Highway via Herondo Street to the south. 2.3 Project Characteristics 2.3.1 Site Preparation Existing roadways will be utilized for the movement of drilling -related vehicles and equipment to and from the site. The site will be graded as necessary to accommodate the placement of drilling machinery. Normal wetting procedures will be utilized throughout the grading period. Upon completion of grading, the drillsite would be compacted and all graded surfaces covered with a compacted 4 to 6 -inch gravel base. s' CITY Ory ..tf ..s;.*itTT..t� Ci C:c A z -xi /r..v r t 0W-4 t. Ar'x.4.c.c 1 .sc.TCrr-4 To r 7'0.41 rE aec re, .•rrl PPCK ...vs ex' 4 r�T r»vr.Mv .vr.c rc%.,rr 'WW1" -.J4.4 vrr$ �1 g.rl rp W« 'rear/J-44 no. 4 _{, Cv.ct.40,rYY AZ7e-4- a.' .4 yr s..r..c r ptic..(T ,rmy Source: HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Title: REGIONAL LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP CITY YARD SITE A 2 Site preparation for the exploratory drilling phase willbe in accord with the City Oil Ordinance which requires at a minimum: setbacks adequate to accommodate all vehicles enter- ing/existing the drilisite to stop or park without extending into the public street or right-of-way (Sec. 21A -2.5B); - -. installation of portable sanitary facilities (Sec. 21A -2.7B)'; lights shall be shielded or directed so as to confine rays to the drilisite (Sec. 21A -2.7C); installation of best available technology vibration equipment (Sec. 21A -2.7D); allsite work and delivery of equipment will be conducted Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays, between the hours of 8 AM and 7 PM (Sec. 21A-2.8); all drilling -related equipment will be stored within a fenced area within the drilisite (Sec. 21A -2.9B). fencing and landscaping as required by the City. . It is contemplated that the City Gara-c/Repair and Animal. Control/Holding facility will be relocated off-site. Relocation — mitigations will be addressed in the EIR. During this phase, drilling and testing equipment will be installed including an electrically -powered drilling rig with sound- proofing. The sound attenuating cover will meet standards as identi- fied in Oil Ordinance Sections 21A-6.2 and 6.3. Temporary production facilities, adequate to accommodate the production of three wells, will also be installed. All structures on-site would be built to meet City and State fire, safety and seismic standards. A concrete block wall (6 feet high) and foliage will be installed along Valley Drive. As needed around the perimeter, a temporary non -transparent • fence with foliage and watering system will be set in place. w It is anticipated that all equipment would be transported to the site by truck. During this phase, an average of five and a maximum of seven heavy-duty, diesel -powered trucks would enter/exit the site per day except for in the event of an emergency. Initial site preparation activities including fencing are anticipated to last 4 weeks. 2.3.2 Exploratory Operations Three exploratory wells will be drilled upon the completion of site preparation. The wells will be drilled to bottom -hole at the perceived best subsurface location. Drilling operations will be conducted continuously (24 -hours a day) until the well is completed. However, deliveries via heavy-duty trucks will be limited to Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays, between the hours of 8 AM and 7 PM as per Oil Ordinance Section 21A-2.10. Drilling of explora- tory wells is anticipated to last three months. Ancillary support equipment will be powered either with electricity or natural gas obtained during drilling/production operations. Upon completion of drilling, the wells will be placed on production for an evaluation period which may last from 3 to 9 months. All drilling- operations will be in compliance with applic- able regulations of the State Department of Conservation, Division of Oil and Gas. All safety and blowout prevention equipment will be of latest oil/gas industry standards. Production obtained during the exploratory operations will be temporarily held on-site (City Yard) in tanks adequate.to accommo- date up to 600 barrels per day each of oil and water. Oil will be trucked off-site and water will be discharged into the City system. During the exploratory phase, it is anticipated that an average of fifteen* and a maximum of eighteen heavy-duty trucks will, enter/exit the site per day. 2.3.3 Site Conversion Upon completion of exploratory activities and/or the determination that commercially producible quantities of oil can be obtained from this location, site conversion operations to permanent facilities will commence. This would generally be subsequent to the drilling and testing of the three exploratory wells (or 4 to 12 months) from the commencement of drilling. The necessary well cellars, production facilities and pipelines will be installed prior to additional drilling. As per Oil Ordinance Section 21A -2.9C, a minimum six-foot wall of solid masonry or concrete construction or comparable with solid gates will be installed. Landscaping and an irrigation system will be installed outside the fence/wall perimeter. 2.3.4 Production Operations/Permanent Facilities An electrically -powered drilling rig will be utilized to drill additional wells for a total of up to 9 wells. Approximately four weeks will be required for the drilling of each well. The drill rig will be aesthetically camouflaged. Permanent production facilities will be installed for up to to thirty wells. The permanent facilities will include the following equipment: * Assumes 11 trucks to accommodate transport of oil and water, 1-2 trucks to transport wastes and mud cuttings, 1-2 trucks to transport gas and 1-3 trucks for miscellaneous pick-ups/de- livery. rti a) Stock tanks (two) b) Wash tank (one) c) Waste water tank (one) d) Test tank with leader manifold (one) e) Fire water Kenockort vessel (one) f) Gas compressor (one) g) Gas fired oil/gas separator (one) Submergible electrical pumps will be used until the pro- duction characteristics of the well indicate that it is advisable to change to conventional electrical beam pumping units. Figure 2 indicates a potential site configuration. Landscaping will be provided to limit visibility from all abutting properties and tra- vellers along the street. Recovered oil and gas will be taken off-site via pipeline. The new pipeline route will lead Wand towards the Chevron refinery via Valley Drive to Herondo Street to. Prospect where it will connect with existing facilities. Figure 3 shows proposed pipeline route. Portable rigs will be used for well work -over operations as required for well maintenance throughout the life of each well. These operations will be limited to Monday through Saturday, exclud- ing legal holidays, between the hours of 8 AM and 7 PM (Section 21A -2.10G). Heavy-duty trucks access to/from the site will be limited to between 8 AM and 7 PM daily. 2.3.5 Site Restoration/Well Abandonment If the drilling results are not as anticipated, the City yard will be turned back to the City, if the City so desires, or wells will be abandoned and the City yard will be returned to its "1 I�IL.Li$J $4 L.iNeti 1 iFegn 2371 s) Source: TRIAD DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. Title: SITE CONFIGURATION -CITY YARD SITE A 7 r•-•--tlifr Vrvax, Source: TRIAD DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. itle: • HGN OEHSITY RE5i0ENfAL MGR OETL4ITY RESIDINT1AL 1 PIPELINE ROUTE - CITY YARD SITE ess original condition. All the wells will be abandoned in full con- formance of the City Oil Ordinance Sec. 21A-7.1, the Division of Oil and Gas and the fire department code. Site restoration will require up to 4 weeks. 2.3.6 Project Phasing The project will be carried out in three phases: explor- atory drilling, well (production) testing and permanent production. The well testing and production phases are .dependent on the results from the preceding (exploratory) phase and if all the drilling and well testing operations are successful, the permanent production facilities will have a life of approximately 20 years. Figure 4 shows a tentative schedule for the development of the oil production activities. it :1 Exploratory Drilling Well Testing Permanent I Facilities FIGURE 4 OILFIELD DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE (Tentative) Weeks Years 0 5 10 15 20 // lyr 2yr 3yr Site Prep. Drilling 1 1 3 month/- mont s Source: MacPherson Oil Co. Marina Del Rey /274 e Cellers Nroauction Tanks (Pipeline Drilling 9 Wells October 6, 1987 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL October 13, 1987 SUBJECT: INFORMATION MEMO CONCERNING 8TH PLACE RESIDENTS' REQUEST FOR POSSIBLE DOWNZONING INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Direct Staff as deemed appropriate. Background At the July 16, 1987 meeting, the City Council requested information concerning the noted matter. Analysis A letter was sent to Mr. Hales (see attached) suggesting that if he wanted his area downzoned, he could petition the residents. A General Plan Amendment as well as a zone change would be necessary since the area is almost all consistent except for a small area along Ninth Street which is designated Medium Density Residential with R-3 zoning. This inconsistent area is not scheduled for change until late in 1988.. If the City Council so desires, Staff can initiate a General Plan/Zone Change for the 1987 fourth quarter General Plan review period. CUR: Gayl T. artn Inte im City Manager R-=p-ctf lly su it e Micha-1 Schu•ac Planning Director lbh � c �' 4 City of 21ermosa l�eachu A Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 April 16, 1987 John T. Hales 624 - 8th Place Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. Hales: This letter is in response to your letter to the Hermosa Beach City Council, dated March 10, 1987. In this letter you requested the City Council and Planning Commission to further analyze the possible land use inconsistencies in your neighborhood. As it presently exists, the block in which you reside is consistent with both its zoning and General Plan designation. The properties on your street are zoned R-2, Two -Family Residential Zone, and the General Plan designation is Medium Density Residential. The portion of your general neighborhood that is inconsistent is along 9th Street. A portion of 9th Street is zoned R-3, Multiple Family Residential, and has a General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. This area of inconsistency will be addressed later this year by the Planning Commission and City Council. The City Council has passed an ordinance •restricting the issuance of Building Permits in areas of inconsistency. Until such areas are made consistent, development can proceed only •in compliance with the requirementsof the lower density designation (Zoning or General Plan). If you wish to have your entire block considered for downzoning to R-1, Single Family Residential, and a General Plan amendment to redesignate it to Low Density Residential, a petition of at least a majority of the property owners should be filed with the City Council. Upon receipt of the petition, the City Council will consider referring this matter to the Planning Commission for study and the required public hearings. This process, being on a neighborhood basis, would not require the normal filing or noticing fees to be incurred by the individual property owners. City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 3793312! 376-6984 • Fire Department 376-2479/376-6984 • Police Department 376-7981 1 376.69E C C City o f2iermosa l�eaclt� Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Thank you for your concern. Hopefully, this letter has answered any questions you may have had regarding the inconsistencies in your general neighborhood. If you have any additional questions, please call me at (213) 376-6984, Ext. 242. Si erely ndrew Perea Associate Planner AP/thb City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379-3312/376-6984 • • Fire Department 376-2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 376.7981 / 376-698 3. .,--:�:,� �.c.Y'a.;t•ick.�lifik3»eCSJ}].�`s>M3a�i.ty: di�'.L.�W:t3 3..=.a�:.ti:�. ti • PLANNING COMMILON MINUTES - APRIL 7, 1987 PAGE 11 - Status report from capital improvemeat_projet.Ts. _MOTION -by Chmn. Sheldon to receive and file the report. No objections; so ore ent regarding procedure for creating - Staff report to City Council dated 3/17/87 regarding request by Mr. John Hales for further analysis of possible land use inconsistencies in his neighborhood. MOTION by Chmn. Sheldon, seconded by Comm. Compton, to direct staff to send a lette to Mr. Hales addressing his concerns. No objections; so ordered. - Memo from City Manager dated 3/25/87 regarding Planning Com • ission purview over Fire Department and Public Works Department requireme s mm. Peirce felt that if there are deficiencies in public works matters, the City should no \wait for new developments to upgrade; implementation should begin a oon as faulty mat \ rs are discovered. He felt that it is an unfair burden to expect d- elopers to bear the en "re cost of upgrading fire and safety concerns. Comm. Pe ce stated that he would attend any Planning Co mission/City Council subcommittemeetings to be held in regard to this issue, stress" • g the importance of the matter. Comm. Compton s tted that a reasonable solution must . determined in regard to who will bear the cost of . • rading. COMMISSIONER ITEMS The Commissioners received t - following items - City Council minutes Copy of letter to Council DeBellis dated 3/18/87 regarding Planning - Commission hearing on Marc' 1 ' 1987, from Paul Herriott Chmn. Sheldon stressed that Mr erriott s informed at the meeting of March 17, 1987, that the Commission wou . hear his testi ony, but that there would be no action taken at that time as it was n. an agenda item. Mr. Lough stated that, a that meeting, he discussed ection 1302 but .not in. relation to Mr. Herriott's project s. cifically. MOTION by Chmn. eldon, seconded by Comm. Rue, to re . ive and file the letter from Mr. Herriott. No .. jections; so ordered. Comm. Schul - requested information on existing conditional use • rmits issued to child care facilit" -s in the City. Mr. Sc ..ach stated that that information is in the Building Departme , . A complete list w. Id be difficult to obtain, though, because records have only been kep since 1985. - . C mm. Schulte noted concern over the fact that abstaining commissioners are ► able to iscuss the issue they are abstaining from at all. He felt that the ab aining. commissioner should be able to speak as an interested citizen, noting that many her • c-;,.POisa6 �'ti.•�:r aa;sr sjit .7.-v Action: To adopt Resolution No. 87-5023, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP #17637 FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 702 FOURTH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson. So ordered. (d) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES TO IMPLEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 86-840 RELATING TO THE COLLECTION OF DELI- QUENT COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL REFUSE FEES. For adop- tion. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director Wil- liam Grove dated March 16, 1987. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 87-5024, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES TO IMPLEMENT ORDINANCE NO. 86-840 RELATING TO THE COLLECTION OF DELI- QUENT COMMERCIAL -AND RESIDENTIAL REFUSE FEES." Motion Williams, second Simpson. So ordered. (e) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 85-4860 RELATING TO AUTHORIZED USERS OF VISA BANK CARD SERVICES FROM BANK OF AMERICA NT&SA. For adoption. Memorandum from City Manager Gregory T. Meyer dated March 18, 1987. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 87-5025, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 85-4860 RELATING TO AUTHORIZED USERS OF VISA BANK CARD SERVICES FROM BANK OF AMERICA NT&SA." Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT.. CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Item (d) and (t) were discussed at this time but are listed in order on the Consent Calendar for clarity. 4. (a) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. Letter from John T. Hales, 624 - 8th Place, Hermosa Beach, dated March 10, 1987 re. discussion of zoning i -inconsistency and its affect on the future of the area (bordered by 5th Street, 11th Street, Pacific Coast Hwy. and Ardmore). . Action: That correspondent be advised his property is consistent (medium density/R-2); that should his neigh- borhood desire they may petition for downzone to low density/R-1. Motion DeBellis, second Williams. So ordered. Minutes 3-24-8 vr-�+�.e%+-- r... ._ .n r..._ .i�ar,�vu .e. tt..-:wa.✓..V.�.a: �.✓ ��.....wL�-rtw.':..i'.., Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council - • March 17, 1987 City Council Meeting of March 24, 1987 REQUEST BY MR. JOHN HALES FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS OF POSSIBLE LAND USE INCONSISTENCIES IN HIS NEIGHBORHOOD RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Mr. Hales be advised that: 1. The properties on his street are zoned R-2 and the General Plan designation is medium density thereby rendering his block consistent; 2. A portion of his general neighborhood, i.e. Ninth Street, is inconsistent (the zoning is R-3 and the General PLan designation is medium density) and will be considered later this year by the Planning Commission and the City Council; 3. Should he wish to have his entire block considered for downzoning to R-1 (with a corresponding change in the General Plan), a petition of at least a majority of the properties should be filed with the City Council. At that time the Council would then consider referring the matter to the Planning Commission for study and public hearing; such process, being on a neighborhood basis, to be at no filing/noticing expense to. the individual property owner. _ •. BACKGROUND The attached letter appears to have been generated in response to a recently granted CUP for a 4 unit condominium at 625 SeventhStreet. That action by the Planning Commission was con- sistent with the zoning and General Plan designations. ..-= ., ry <._ • '.•r..,: ai ..... t;n �F-2,4 F. "r.,c b'2 t: a�..tt�: l`. i. :'�'raw-+'S: �s•:4.: :ti,;- , .� :,'i .e..• - ANALYSIS As it presently stands the block in which Mr. Hales resides has consistency between its zone and general plan designations. Should Mr. Hales wish to seek reduced density for his neighbor- hood (both zoning and general plan) the City Council might wish to consider asking the Planning Commission to hear the matter as a part of their quarterly General Plan hearing process; subject to their being an adequate show of interest by the affected prop- erty owners. As an incentive to the possibility of reduced den- sity, the Council might consider that a neighborhood petition would warrant the hearing process being conducted as a matter of public policy. This would eliminate the need for Mr. Hales to pay filing fees, etc. In addition to the staff recommendation, available to the City Council are: 1. Schedule Mr. Hales for an oral the City Council on April 14; 2. Receive and File Gregory T. Cit Manager GTM/ld Attachment cc: Planning Director Schubach other alternatives presentation before r.. _ :le••:,•:�••••F ..� v�i•:sL:i:.Sd S,rw+�+'..%.xt=L.v`:cay1J'k1Fx'.�% .J i.ic=ii.:iil-••lyf$yaijjs'r.. _•�:ai .• rc .ek've -7: ii-aebv /mra441 iglea .ayLy cs Li lb 4 -. -- � MA R ; 9 1��7&.. Coy of Herniae s a Beach 4 4v%J�,/a4ir, , 11•11SS1/'ice; y, N /37,4_x,./QB7, a A491 -a-44-- 4ec,4Gv.s.✓ ri-e4 .-aa/ lir ar/r eawrf A`Qdio-L,e0 L*e_ : tom ) 4 -a- 4—un.:/ co,tdoir,.;,L,e.e. e) ,,e../' te-z /mss•. 24 87/0.., ,tea.: 3 72 -/57c -G 4 . 327 -?6id 1174t4 Io, ? /31.4>Z7sice... e-er"4.2‘44.--egri-L•44-6,.. /tie ;.,,,,,,,, ds4.0? rs,M9/c resIc/e c) .;:,•t• /3y Ger ad e�y e�.�..r t� w l4 : `- ,,G4 G r •*."- s cw --. / G / ira4c2zi•-v.• sP %-c e-Yc, ✓e' [-U- 444---0.1-341,b41.6 . R -z A - cr,�. e- 51/4 -c - e..44/ // -,/A Pte- , e -e l4*< 9 .0 74 C. v.w o p1J A130 -'-E-9 . tet ': C;ZC a f -u4.., 0 -cc y k LG 44,v t � ar c, f^�411:40.c--- 1L 4e err.-ccs'e. - at- 2-2 gone.. w!w;"- Gua,4„.--.,,-,e.2.i1 o -.L fl.e-- 74y Is / 9�a /I )7' c -'"`�``- p� s fes.. ,�,,,..._.e-es St, '7 71 ; cz. `ias� 4,.�,.�•z.,,g� 4 /0�var % vyw� :,,ee.cit.. 4r fes- ... J •ad t R-3 ales nS " . C�e� • 49 �f� Sfr��r'• /s �.� �„ sr $ f�,.�'wef�. • . ':;:--`. I . ! - - . . _: S,ap/a-Yestlr.ece- rick 9,-€d'v— 4�/� b�- 7- • a j -rola - 1 C� 1,-'241-Y lheel .141:-. .1--:(e-e- 4 4 �/5cv$ $ -4 `� vra (Gi. `d'I57� � e,....../ 'e.) 5 V i -e-7/64-er&a,- -te.c.; /,-,--e-,".--e-- eklec.4-1—, . 1:'(471 -1 -1.i -r -fl. fr"4---- ZL aerS ed desev o s ce.W., %tom 7 oi�� •�G.e„ �`a�.-� . �� 5 � ,ate 71- a � �/ �C. .e aare-c_. "c Gam rrr d,. d cr c�..c s 1' - 7"& .. c e `/ , r•seyai,f- 7 / v, L ou 5 15 7414vr G�Ke LsQ J�ayc.� • ���i.�-,..lc� y c. ,N..•o:....• e:..�a=tr•R�:'i+'t:.:a.:r:E?".x+.lniti,..7�.--w .. ....;.w.t._.. ,...., �.il�?;• �,_..Y.r ..�.�:,v._ �o Gl+:r2 .,h;t:...',iaies �: �1a r Sv cr ss°ta..` �s�:y�v'cri+-9. .�"nx�. 1 Counter Inquiries/Applications X287 Seventy (70) hours of staff time were spent at the counter for the month of June. Budget Update Ending 6/30/87, expenditures were 12.87 below budget. NOTE: This savings does NOT include an $18,000 appropriation decrease in April by the Finance Department. Ending 6/30/87, revenues were 1117 of estimated figures. Transit Update "WAVE" Dial -a -Ride Ridership - June, 1987 TOTAL RIDERSHIP: 4,770 passengers Hermosa Beach: 686 passengers Redondo Beach: 3,488 passengers Passengers picked up from various satellite points: .596 Passengers requiring lift chair: 48 "WAVE" Dial -A -Ride Ridership - May, 1987 TOTAL RIDERSHIP: 4,326 passengers Hermosa Beach: 753 passengers Redondo Beach: 3,038 passengers Passengers picked up from various satellite points: 535 Passengers requiring lift chair: 49 HERMOSA COMMUTER BUS Ridership - June, 1987 TOTAL RIDERSHIP: 422 passengers HERMOSA COMMUTER BUS Ridership - May, 1987 TOTAL RIDERSHIP: 379 passengers Catalina Channel Express Update The Catalina Channel Express service, which the City Council supported on April 14, 1987, has received approval from the California Public Utilities Commission to provide daily service from Redondo Beach to the island city Avalon. The service is scheduled to commence next summer. Update of Mr. Hales' request to investigate the feasibility of downzoning of his block Staff has not been able to contact Mr. Hales to determine whether he still desires to downzone his block, because he has changed his place of employment and Staff has not been able to reach him at home. Since Staff is having such difficulty reaching him, a letter will be sent to inquire what he proposes to do. q. Further.Action: To direct.the City Clerk to communicate with the Civil Service Commissioners who are eligible for reappointment of City Council policy of advertising all commission vacancies and stressing that this pojicy is not a reflection on the current commissioners. Motion Mayor Cioffi, second DeBellis. So ordered. Final_Action: To advertise for Community Resources Com- mission applicants together with the Civil Service and Planning Commissioners. . Motion DeBellis, second Rosnberger. So ordered. Rosenberger - Steam Cleaning Downtown Sidewalks Referred to the City Manager for a report. (b) (0) Rosenberger-,Downzoningbetween Ardmore and Pacific Coast Highway Planning Director to include status in Activity Report July 28, 1987. (d) Rosenberger - Status of Shuttle (Herman) re Expandin Program aid Assistance in Funding Planning Director to include status in Activity Report July 28, 1987. (e) Rosenberger -,City Attorney Bills/Retainer Agreement To be discussed at the next Closed Executive Session. (f) Simpson - Sister City Program The City Clerk was asked to prepare a one-page history of the City of Hermosa Beach. APPEARANCE OF INTERESTED CITIZENS None. The meeting adjourned temporarily on Thursday, July 16, 1987 at the hour of 11:06 P.M. to a Closed.. Executive Session to discuss personnel, litigation and legal advice. The meeting reconvened at 11:53 P.M. -40 - Minutes 7-16-8 V V R-3 C-3 • • • • , • • • • .• • • • • • • , • • , • • • • • • , • • • • , • • • • • • • • • • • , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ▪ • • • • • • • • ••.•••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .•••••••• O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••• , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • f •"i�T • • • • • • .• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. • 4_L • .p•• • • • T • • 0 ••••••e•••• •••!f, • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• - ... Y • •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• • •• •• •• •• • ' •• •.••.•••••••.••••••• • • • •. • • • • • ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. • e • • • `• O. • • • • • f190:1,0 • • • • • • • s. October 6, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council October 13, 1987 APPROVAL OF SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT CONCERTS ON THE BEACH RECOMMENDATION It is recommended City Council approve the attached Special Event Permit. (Attachment A) BACKGROUND The City of Hermosa Beach has approved, in concept only, a concert series on the beach presented by the Community Center Foundation. That series was to be held this present Fall subject to funding secured from outside sponsors. As the sponsorship money was not secured by the estalished deadline, the Foundation decided not to pursue the concert series at this time, but to reschedule for Spring, 1988. The Foundation has been assured by each of the sponsors they will participate at that time. That is the only permit the City Council has approved to date for a musical event on the beach. Attachment B is a copy of the agenda item approved by the City Council. ANALYSIS This particular request is before the City Council this evening as it is a "first" in terms of concerts on the beach. The -requesting organization is fulfilling all the requirements specified in the Special Event Permit. While this is a series of free concerts on the beach, it is anticipated it will be a much smaller project than the one to be produced by the Community Center Foundation. Another difference between the two projects is that City staff will produce the Foundation's series but has nothing to do with the Easy Reader series that is before you this evening. City staff will process the permit for this event and will monitor the concerts on behalf of the City, but will not directly participate in organizing the event. The cost for the staff person at the concert will be paid for by the organization requesting the permit. Other options available to the City Council are: 1. Deny the permit and then allow the Foundation to be the first organization to attempt this kind of project on the beach; 1 ICC 2. Approve permit and add more conditions which will further protect the City. ur: ayle Inter]. k:77 . Martin City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted, Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources • Attachment rl City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 902511 376-69811 extension 280 or 379-3312 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION Organization's Name: Easy Reader/Ozzie Cadena Profit x Non -Profit Non-profit Number Organization's Address: 1233 Hermosa Ave. Hermosa Beach Zip Code 90254 Phone Number(s): 372-4611 Contact Person and Title: Kevin Cody Publisher Contact Person's Address: Hermosa Beach 54 17th Court Zip Code 90254 Daytime Phone Number: 372-4611 Evening Phone Number: 379-3898 Brief Description of Event: Small Jazz Combos to perform on the beach north of the pier at 14th Street on sand. Date(s) of Event: Location(s) of Event: October 17, 24, 31 Set-up Time: hour 9'A. M. Time Event is to Commence: 10 A. M. to 1 P. M. Number of Participants (Including volunteers): 6 Anticipated Number of Spectators: 100 Number -of Vehicles Involved and How Used: One to transport equipment Description of Set-up for this Event: Band Stand Electrical connection to utility outlet Additional Information or Special Requests: Wish to borrow risers, sub"ect to availabilit Fees, Charges and Other Requirements: Police Costs $ Fire Costs $ Business License $ Public Works Costs $ Processing Fee $ Other Costs $ Total Due $ Refundable Damage Deposit $ Damage Deposit is due: Balance of fees incurred are due: Insurance Required: Yes No Date Received Unless greater or lessor coverage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa beach evidence of $1 million comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees as additional insureds. Expiration Date . Permittee waives claims against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees, for fees or damages caused by, arising out of, or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND TO RETURN SAID PREMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT:. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER NECESSARY MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND/OR FURNISHED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AS MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTH PARTIES. /� / �7 Com an Re restat ve Date Y P Permit to be processed through City Council: Yes No If YES, Council's decision: Application is invalid without the following signatures: Department of Community Date Resouces Police Department Date Authorization Fire Department Date Authorization if Required Life Guard Authorization Date Needed on all Water Events July 1, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City -CouncEil ".,,_- 04..4 ATTACHMENT B City Council Meeting of July 14, 1987 OUTDOOR CONCERT SERIES Recommendation It is recommended that City Council approve in concept a free outdoor concert series to be sponsored by the Community Center Foundation and the Easy Reader to be held in September/October of this year. Background - The Easy Reader has approached the Foundation with a proposal to co-sponsor an outdoor concert series in September/October of this year with the Easy Reader providing sponsorship funds and the Foundation handling the production end of the series. This event will not proceed until' the funds are secured. Analysis The Easy Reader's purpose for this is to bring a nice element into the downtown area and to enhance business in that area as well. The Foundation was approached as it now has a reputation for producing good quality entertainment. In exchange for this expertise, the Easy Reader has agreed that a contribution will be made to the Foundation for it's efforts. The_ Board of Directors of the Foundation is asking for conceptual approval only at this time. The following details will give.. the City Council a better idea of what the series will entail. Series to consist of five Sunday afternoon concerts probably beginning at 2:00 p.m. and lasting two hours. Series to take place in late September, early October. ▪ Entertainers to be "middle of the road" with both the Foundation and the Easy Reader mutually agreeing on the entertainers. This will dictate the type of person attending. ▪ The concerts will be free to the public and held immediately south of the Pier on the beach. ig 1 Targeted area for advertising is South Bay only. By restricting the advertising, it is felt it would also limit the attendance. Public Service announcements will be used as well. Security, clean up, shuttle service and all other details pertinent to a special event will be handled by the Foundation/Community Resources staff. The attendance figure for each concert is projected at 2,000. As a comparison the Pro Volleyball Tournament estimates attendance at 15;000 people per .day. ▪ Portable band shell will be used. ▪ Department of Beaches and Harbors will be contacted to receive their assistance. Both the Easy Reader and the Foundation are most concerned that this be a very low-key; enjoyable Sunday afternoon event and will do everything it can to insure such. The action taken by the Foundation Board of Directors at their June 15th meeting was as follows: Motion: "To support this idea with the following conditions: 1) That the sponsors agree to restrict advertising to the South Bay. area only; 2) that both. the Easy Reader and Foundation mutually agree on the entertainment." Further, that the two above conditions being acceptable to the sponsors, the Foundation will pursue support from the City Council and that inherent in all this, the Department of Community Resources staff will produce the series." Please see the attached staff report to the Foundation. Should the Council support this proposal in concept only, the Board will begin workon it immediately and return to a City Council meeting as soon as possible with more details and at that time ask for final approval of the project.. Concur: Gregory T. eyer Ci y Manager Respectfully submitted, Leit- Alana M.-Mastriari, Direct() Dept. of Community Resources AA_K_ George S mel'Vzer, Presiden Board of Directors Community Center Foundation CO-SPONSOR: OUTDOOR CONCERT SERIES: FALL 1987 The Foundation has been approached by Mr. Richard Budman of the Easy Reader with a proposal that the Foundation and Easy Reader be co -presenters of an outdoor concert series to be held in Hermosa Beach this fall. Mr. Budman indicated the Easy Reader would provide the funds necessary for this event, up to $79,000 and would handle all the marketing and advertising'. Our responsibility would be to book the talent, produce the shows and lead the charge, if necessary, to gain approval from the City Council. Both the Easy Reader and the Foundation must mutually agree as to the entertainers. The Series calls for five concerts to be held at an outside location on five Sunday afternoons in September and October. The budget breakdown is as follows: Entertainer Contracts: $25,000 Miscellaneous Costs,: , 29,000 Foundation Contribution and site rental fees_ 25,000 Total $79,000 After taking a "tour" of the City, it appears there are possibly three locatons that may be considered. And it is important to note that the financial backers are looking for attendance figures in the area of 2,000 people per concert. LOCATION #1: VALLEY PARK While there is plenty of room, homes are located very close by and there is very limited parking. LOCATION #2: CLARK FIELD' Same problem as Valley Park in regard to the homes being located close by and while the.parking situation is somewhat better, we would have to displace soccer and adult softball leagues for five Sundays. That would create a lot of bad feelings. LOCATION #3: SOUTH SIDE OF THE PIER ON THE BEACH This appears to be the best location. However there are many potential problems with this also. Things to be considered: 3 There •was'opposition.to the Chamber of Commerce's idea of concerts on the beach -albeit they were going to fence it off, charge -people and tie it up for a full weekend. This event may get mixed up with that event in the minds of people. How do we handle more than 2,000 people and is that a problem. What are the advertising/marketing boundaries? All of Los Angeles; just the South Bay; etc.. Will the few businesses in the proposed location be negatively affected by'the event? As there are many questions to be answered, Mr. Richard Budman of the Easy Reader will be at the meeting to discuss this propo.sal thoroughly. 4 October 6, 1987 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of Regular Meeting of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL October 13, 1987 AWARD OF DESIGN CONTRACT FOR CIP 87-606 - FIRST FLOOR POLICE DEPARTMENT REMODEL INCLUDING DISPATCH ROOM Recommendation It is recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Joncich, Sturm & Associates for architectural services for the design of the Police Department first floor remodel including dispatch room at a cost not to exceed $14,630. 2. Appropriate as follows: 1. $77,500 2. $22,380 from the reserve for contingency to CIP 87-606 Reserved for RCC on June 23, 1987 Additional appropriation Background On May 26, 1987 City Council took action to instruct staff to begin preparations for in-house dispatching for Fire, Police and General Services and for providing in-house records management services for Fire and Police to become operational July 1, 1988. This Council direction also included instruction to: a. b. c. design, construct and remodel facilities as necessary, plan for, acquire and install equipment, test for, select and train personnel as necessary. On June 23, 1987, City Council approved the Capital Improvement Budget, which included the design only of the first floor Police Department remodel (CIP 87-606). City Council appropriated $10,000 for design and reserved $77,500 for RCC but did not appropriate the amount for any specific project. On August 11, 1987, City Council approved $43,900 additional funds for CIP 87-606, (construction -first floor Police Department remodel, including dispatching center). On August 25, 1987, City Council authorized staff to solicit proposals for the design work. Requests for proposals were mailed to eight architectural firms on August 28, 1987 and written proposals were received from three architects on September 22, 1987. All three architects came to the site before submitting a proposal and talked to both the Public Safety Director and Public Works Director. At these meetings all of the architects envisioned the remodel project 1 add costing more than has been budgeted. It is their opinion that the dispatch room cannot be installed without a remodel since the dispatch room will displace a presently occupied area. The relocation of the presently occupied areas constitutes a large part of the remodel, in addition to the electrical and mechanical work. The scope of services are shown on the attached agreement. Their design work and the subsequent construction will essentially rebuild a large portion of the police department's first floor. Analysis The three architectural firms submitting proposals are: Firm Design Cost Pre -design Estimate of Probable Cost Joncich, Sturm & Associates $13,300 $115,000 Black, O'Dowd & Associates $16,119 Not submitted. Richard T. Santos $16,500 $176,270 The balance of the analysis will consider the following: 1. Selection of architect and reference check. 2. An additional appropriation is necessary to complete all work. 3. Fiscal impact. 4. Summary. 5. Recommendation 1. SELECTION OF ARCHITECT AND REFERENCE CHECK The lowest cost proposal was submitted by Joncich, Sturm & Associates. All supplied references for similar work commented highly of the architects work - especially their remodel expertise. 2. AN ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION IS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL WORK Because of the nature andextent of the remodel, additional funding is necessary in order that all work can be completed. The preliminary cost prepared by staff estimated all work could be accomplished for $43,900. However, the architects submitted pre -design estimates of probable cost between $115,000 and $177,000. The architects say that because of the nature of this work (i.e. mechanical & electrical work) fees for design as well as construction cost are normally higher. I've prepared a CIP budget sheet showing the new appropriation necessary to complete this project along with a -potential funding source. (I also updated the phase III cost to reflect a more realistic remodel cost.) 3. FISCAL IMPACT Design Budget Only Plans, Specification & Estimate 10% Contingency TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED Revised Project Budget Design Construction Inspection & Administration Subtotal 10% Contingency TOTAL ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION Potential Funding Source $13,300 1,330 $14,630 Existing Appropriation $10,000 $43,900 - 0- $53,900 - 0- $53,900 $153,780 - Proposed Appropriation $ 13,300 $115,000 $ 11,500 $139,800 $ 13,980 $153,780 53,900 = $99,880 It is recommended that funding be made from the General Fund Reserve for Contingency. As part of the FY87-88 budget, City Council reserved $77,500 for the RCC project. This coupled with an additional $22,380 will ensure completion of the remodel project. The Police Department is expecting a share of money which was seized in a criminal action over a year ago and later forfeited. This share is expected to be between $350,000 to $450,000. If and when this money is received, it could be used to fund the project. There is pending legislation (Title II of H.R. 2763) in the U.S. Senate which could place a freeze on all disbursements to state and local law enforcement agencies under the equitable sharing program of the Department of Justice's Asset Forfeiture Fund. If this passes, we could be delayed in receiving the money for some time. Hopefully money ($350,000 to $450,000) will have been received by the City prior to project bidding (scheduled for February/March, 1988). Construction is scheduled to begin in May 1988. 4. SUMMARY In order to remain on a time schedule that will accommodate a reasonable construction and training period for dispatch officers, it is recommended that design proceed. Alternate funding may be available in the future pending receipt of up to $450,000. 3 5. RECOMMENDATION Based on previous actions and the commitment to withdraw from RCC, it is recommended to proceed with design of the remodel and budget the necessary construction dollars. Alternatives Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Drop the project. 2. Modify the scope of the work. Resp fully submitt il/014/' Anthony Antich Director of Publii Works NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: •/ 1 Viki Copeland Steve Wisni- `ski Finance Administrator Attachments: Public Safety Director Project Schedule Project Budget Professional Services Agreement 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU FY88-89 • SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL• IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM • PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER: PROGRAM AREA: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:• WORK PROPOSED: Phase I Phase II Phase III Police Department Remodel CIP 87-606 001-401-8606-4201, Public Buildings & Grounds Completed - Director of Public Safety offices. Demolition and modification of approximately 1,750 square feet of existing space In the Police Facility (to be bid in two phases) - remodel and , dispatching center. The work will Include updating the existing electrical power and mechanical to service the modified square footage, selection of flooring material, wall treatments, fixed storage, ceiling treatment and other appurtenant work. Redesign of basement floor - locker and shower rooms (for female employees), patrol officer briefing & work area and office spaces for patrol. This work will lead to the construction of these improvements. 70 feet x 30 feet x $100/sf - $210,000 • • BUDGET SCHEDULE Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 •Col 6 Col 7 EXPENDED EST'ED EST'ED TOTAL PROJECT ELEMENTS BUDGET THRU THRU FY86-87 PROJECT FY86-87 2/28/87 6/30/87 BALANCE FY87-88 FY88-89 BUDGET PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING I I I I I I I I PLANS, SPECS & ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS I 1 I 1 1 13,3001 1 13,3001 1115,0001210,0001325,0001 1 11,5001 1 11,500, SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY TOTAL EXPENDITURE FUNDING SCHEDULE 139, 1 , 1 800210000349;'800 1 1 13,980 13,980 153,780 210,000 363,780 FUND NO. FUNDING SOURCES ********** * FUNDING DISTRIBUTION ************** TOTAL I I I I I I 1 I• 001 I General Fund (1) (1) June 23, 1987 Council Action: $10,000 General Fund I Unfunded (Design only) • August 11, 1987 Council Action; $43,000 General Fund designation for CIP October 13, 1987 Council Action: 1. $77,500 Reserved for RCC on June 23, 1987 2. $22,380 Additional appropriation 1 I 1153,780 1 11L8_01 I-- • 1 1 • - 1210,0001210,0001 w I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 153,780 210,000 363,780 • DESIGN SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME : CIP 87-606: First Fl nnr Pnl i rtp rept- Remodel, Including Dispatch Room ACCOUNT NUMBER : 001-400-8606-4201 TASKS Prepare request for proposals Advertise for proposals Consultant selection procedure Award contract 1 1 LI Sign contract Issue "Notice to Proceed" Design Period LEGEND • TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : ACTUAL SCHEDULE : X : 100% COMPLETE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 11111111 I : 1 X171111III T 111111111 11 i .11111 I -1 1 i s i i 11111111 111111111 Monitor and review design 1111111111111 Final design approval before advertising11111111111, for construction 1 1 111111 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME : CIP 87-606: First Floor Police Dept. Remodel, Including Dispatch Room ACCOUNT NUMBER : 001-400-8606-4201 LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : inimmommom ACTUAL SCHEDULE X : 100% COMPLETE I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I TASKS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Final design approval before advertising11111111I11111 I 1 1 I for construction Prepare advertisement & set bid opening date Advertising period (issue addendums as necessary) Accept sealed bids & public bid opening Review bids Award contract Sign contract (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) Preconstruction meeting procedure Issue "Notice to Proceed" Construction Period Monitor progress & maintain records Progress payment and change order procedure Acceptance of work as complete Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" Retention Payment Project close out 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111111 1 /1111111 1171/1711 /111/111 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111111111111111111111111111111.11111 I I 1 I I I I 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 I I 1 1 I I I I 111111111 111111111111111111111111111 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 11111/11/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 . 1111/11111 1 1 1 11 1 11111111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111111111111111111111111111 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FIRST FLOOR POLICE DEPARTMENT REMODEL INCLUDING DISPATCH ROOM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CIP 87-606 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 13th day of October , 1987 by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Joncich, Sturm & Associates, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform ar- chitectural remodeling services at a cost not to exceed $14,630 as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein and by this reference made a part hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. CITY agrees to retain CONSULTANT to perform architec- tural remodeling services as herein set forth. 2. CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to com- plete in a manner satisfactory to CITY the services set forth in Exhibit "A" entitled Scope of Work and attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. The pre - design estimate of construction cost is $115,000. Consultant's design shall not exceed this estimate without prior written approval. 3. All information, data, reports and records and maps as are existing and available from CITY, and necessary for carrying 1 out the work outlined in Exhibit "A" shall be furnished to CON- SULTANT without charge by CITY and CITY shall cooperate in every way reasonable in the carrying out of the work without delay. 4. CONSULTANT represents that it employs, or will employ at is own expense all personnel required in performing the ser- vices required under this Agreement. 5. All of the services required hereunder will be per- formed by CONSULTANT or underits direct supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized or permitted under state and local law to perform such services. 6. CITY's Director of Public Works (the "Director" or his designee) shall direct the CONSULTANT to proceed and the work required shall be completed within the 60 calendar days from the Notice to Proceed. CONSULTANT shall have no claim for compensa- tion for any services upon which the Director has not authorized CONSULTANT to proceed. 7. The CONSULTANT shall work closely and cooperate fully with the Director, or his designee, who shall be the liaison between CONSULTANT and the CITY and who shall review and approve all details of the work as it progresses. 8. The CITY reserves the right to terminate or suspend the Agreement at any time upon seven (7) days written notice ef- fected by personal delivery or by a bona fide mail service, which shall be deemed communicated as of the date of receipt thereof, under any of the following circumstances: (a) The project, as described in the attached Exhibit "A", is to be abandoned or indefinitely postponed. - 2 (b) CONSULTANT fails to prosecute the work within the time limits specified in the attached Exhibit "A". (c) Unsatisfactory performance by CONSULTANT. 9. No change in the scope of the work to be performed by CONSULTANT shall be made except in writing between CITY and CON- SULTANT, which shall set forth the changes mutually agreed upon by the CITY and the CONSULTANT. 10. In accordance with State Compensation Laws, the CONSULTANT shall carry Worker's Compensation insurance for all persons employed in the performance of services as set forth herein. The CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with a certificate verifying such coverage or endorsement acceptable to the CITY before commencing services under this Agreement. Such policy shall require thirty (30) days notice to the CITY in writing prior to cancellation, termination, or expiration of any kind. 11. The CONSULTANT shall carry Professional Liability in- surance in an amount of not less than $250,000.00. The CONSUL- TANT shall provide the City with certificates verifying such coverage or endorsement acceptable to the City before commencing services under this Agreement. Such policy shall require thirty (30) days notice to the City in writing prior to cancellation, termination or expiration of any kind. All insurance policies Beach as additional insured. 12. If CONSULTANT fails CITY may obtain such insurance shall name the City of Hermosa to and of the premiums for such insurance Agreement. 3 maintain such insurance, the deduct and retain the amount from any sums due under this 13. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limit- ing in any way the extent to which CONSULTANT may be held respon- sible to payment of damages to persons or property resulting from its operations or any operations of any subcontractors under it. CONSULTANT will be required to indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers and employees from any claims, damages, or ex- penses, including attorney's fees and court costs, arising out of CONSULTANT'S negligent performance under this agreement. 14. In the event that legal action is commenced to enforce or declare the rights created under this Agreement, the prevail- ing party shall be entitled to an award of costs and reasonable attorney's fees in the amount to be determined by the court. 15. The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work or any part of the work performed under this Agreement at the rates and in the manner established in the attached Exhibit "A". 16. This Agreement shall begin upon execution and shall expire on the date shown on the Notice to Proceed unless extended in writing by mutual agreement of both CITY and CONSULTANT. 17. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties, but it shall not be assigned by the CON- SULTANT without the written consent of the CITY. 18.. The CONSULTANT shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or otherwise) without the prior written approval of the CITY, provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due the CONSULTANT from the CITY under this Agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution or to a Trustee in Bankruptcy, without such 4 approval. Notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to the CITY. 19. No member of the governing body of the CITY and no other officer, employee, or agent of the CITY who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and carrying out of the program, shall have any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement; and the CONSUL- TANT shall take appropriate steps to assure compliance. 20. The CONSULTANT covenants that he presently has no interest and shall not acquire interest, direct or indirect, in the study area or any parcels therein or any interest which would conflict in any manner or degree wth the performance of his ser- vices hereunder. The CONSULTANT further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed. 21. This agreement supercedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the employment of CONSULTANT by CITY and contains all the covenants and agreements between the parties withrespect to such employment in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement or amendment hereto shall be effective unless executed in writing and signed by both CITY and CONSULTANT. 22. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in -. 5 - accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all ap- plicable federal statutes and regulations as amended. 23. The invalidity in whole or part of any provision of this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all applicable federal statutes and regulations as amended. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: TY "ATTORNE 6 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH A Municipal Corporation By: MAYOR, City of Hermosa Beach By: CONSULTANT CONSULTANT JSA 839 So. Beacon Street Joncich, Sturm & Associates Suite 214 Architecture San Pedro, California 90731 213/831-2372 September 21, 1987 City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Mr. Anthony Antich Director of Public Works Subject: Request for Proposal CIP 87-606 Dear Mr. Antich: EXHIBIT A We at JSA along with our consultants are pleased to submit this proposal in response to your Request for Proposal noted above. As outlined in your request, this proposal will set a fee for Architectural, Electrical and Mechanical work associated with the modification of space in the existing city Police Facility. The plans will be detailed to allow for a two-phase bid and construction. The work included in this proposal with preliminary cost estimate and not to exceed fee is as follows: 1. Update the existing electrical power and mechanical to service the modified square footage and altered office space and dispatching center. Pre -design Estimate $ 20,500 of probable cost Design Fee (NTE) $ 5,000 2. Renovate the existing interior space encompassing a portion of the existing police space. (approximately 1750 square feet) This work includes: a. Change the floor plan b. Select new floor, wall and ceiling materials c. Relocate fixed storage d. New dispatching space e. All appurtenant work required for the above JSA Joncich, Sturm & Associates Architecture September 21, 1987 City of Hermosa Beach Attn: Mr. Anthony Antich Subj: RFP CIP 86-606 Page Two EXHIBIT A Pre -design Estimate $88,000 of probable cost Design Fee (NTE) $ 7,500 The fees listed here include the design, drawing, specifying, cost estimating, and the city review process. The fees and cost estimates are based on a project scope as outlined in the Request for Proposal and a guided walk through the project site. Mr. Jerry Sturm, principal in the firm of JSA, will direct the project. Working under him as Project Job Captain will be Mr. Michael Duran, who in his nearly four years with the firm has had projects ranging from a new 5.8 million dollar office building to many renovation projects for the U.S. Postal Service and the Army and Air Force Exchange Service. Mr. John Snyder, registered Electrical Engineer, has owned and operated an Elect- rical firm in Burbank, California for 29 years. His company is comprised of 18 total personnel including 6 design engineers from which to draw. Mr. Snyder, like myself, takes an active role in the day-to-day supervision of his staff. MBA is an 11 -year-old Mechanical Engineering firm owned and operated by Mel Bilow. His staff of 11 includes 2 registered Mechanical Engineers. Similar Projects Include: Architectural Renovation of 3 Los Angeles City Schools including relocation of offices, lobbies and storage areas. The projects required coordination of electrical and mech- anical to upgrade 50 -year-old buildings. Electrical -= Renovation of Glendale Police Facility - West Hollywood Sheriff Station - Rampart Police Facility for City of Los Angeles - Currently working on Burbank Police Facility (working with MBA Mechanical Engineers, the engineering firm proposed for this project) Mechanical Burbank Police Facility Renovation . JSA Joncich, Sturm & Associates Architecture September 21, 1987 City of Hermosa Beach Attn: Mr. Anthony Antich Subj: RFP CIP 86-606 Page Three EXHIBIT A Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal. Be assured of our sincere interest in this important project and our desire to be of service to the City of Hermosa Beach. If you have any questions regarding our proposal or your project, please give me a call. Very truly yours, y Principal JS/jp AIA JSA 839 So. Beacon Street Joncich, Sturm & Associates Suite 214 Architecture San Pedro, California 90731 213/831-2372 October 1, 1987 City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Mr. Anthony Antich Director of Public Works Subj: Addendum to Proposal CIP 87-606 Dated September 21, 1987 Dear Mr. Antich: EXHIBIT A RECEAM OCT 21987 I PiJL uj WORKS DEPT As requested, we are submitting this Addendum to modify our initial proposal as follows: 1. Architect's Work Schedule • Prepare as -built drawings O Prepare schematic drawings O Review by City U Prepare final construction bid documents TOTAL: 2. Contractor's Construction Schedule - Estimated 1 week 1 week 1 week 5 weeks 8 weeks • If constructed in single phase (unobstructed space) 2 to 3 months • If phased (facility operational) 3 to 4 months 3. Cost Estimate for: a. Dispatch Center (only) Does not account for work to relocate functions dislocated by new Dispatch Center b. Complete remainder of Police renovation TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE: $ 30,000 $ 85,000 $115,000 JSA Joncich, Sturm & Associates Architecture October 1, 1987 City of Hermosa Beach Attn: Mr. Anthony.Antich Subj: Proposal CIP 87-606 Page Two EXHIBIT A 4. Fee Distribution - Assumes that the total project will be designed at one time: a. Dispatch Center (only) $ 3,500 b. Remainder of Facility $ 9,000 TOTAL: $ 12,500 5. Additional fee to provide service during the bidding process: TOTAL: $ 800 This concludes the addendum. We look forward to working with you on the Police Facility renovation. Very truly yours, urm, AIA Principal JS/jp September 18, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 13, 1987 AUTHORIZATION TO REBID ON RESURFACING OF KELLY COURTS AT CLARK FIELD, CIP 87-507 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Reject all bids received for the above -referenced project. 2. Re -advertise for bids for the Kelly Courts resurfacing project (CIP 87-507) and issue addenda as necessary. Background: On August 11, 1987 City Council authorized the Public Works Department to advertise for bids for the resurfacing and other improvements of Kelly Courts. This project was advertised for bid for three weeks and eighteen contractors received the bid specifications. On September 11, 1987, (bid due date) sealed bids were received, publicly opened and read aloud. Only two contractors responded to our request for bids as follows: RYCO Construction $102,210.00 NEFF Construction $134,000.00 Engineer's Estimate $ 37,500.00 The apparent low bid is not within the budgeted appropriation. Analysis: This analysis is divided into the following sections: 1. The other potential bidders. 2. Revised specifications to reduce cost. 3. Summary. 1. The Other Potential Bidders The sixteen contractors not submitting a bid were contacted and indicated various reasons for their non -submittal as follows: a. The Dodge Report (a weekly construction journal which advertises pending projects) published an incorrect bid due date. Consequently, five contractors did not submit their bid on time. b. Nine contractors were simply "too busy" to undertake another project at this time. 1 c. One was "not interested in that type of work", and d. one felt that the City had not budgeted enough money for the project. 2. Revised Specifications to Reduce Costs Staff discussed the plans and specifications with both bidders and several other contractors in an effort to determine why only 2 bids were received and at a cost so much greater than the engineer's estimate. As a result, the engineer's estimate has been revised (Exhibit A) to more accurately reflect the contractor's costs (including more accurate labor and insurance costs). The estimated cost is between $45,000 (alternate bid) and $82,000 (base bid). In addition, in an effort to reduce costs, the specifications have been re -written to eliminate the "frills". For example, rather than completely demolishing and rebuilding the existing fence (as originally bid); the existing fence poles and hardware will be salvaged (estimated cost savings -$4,000). Galvanized chain link fabric will be utilized in lieu of vinyl coated (as originally bid) for an estimated cost savings of $2,000). Additionally, the project will be bid as a base bid (asphalt resurfacing and acrylic play surface) both and an "alternate bid" (acrylic play surface only). The alternate bid could result in a cost savings of $30,000. After the bids are received, staff will conduct an engineering economic analysis of the two alternatives, before making a recommendation to Council. If necessary, additional funds may be requested at that time. The complete revised plans and specifications are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. 3. Summary Staff recommends authorization to re -bid the project. This may result in the following: a. With construction scheduled during the winter months, contractors should be "less busy", and a greater number of more competitively priced proposals should be received. b. The revised specifications should result in lower bids. Exhibit B illustrates the revised Project Schedule. Alternatives: Other alternatives available to Council and considered by staff are: 1. Award a contract to RYCO Construction in the amount of $102,210. Appropriate the following additional funds from the Reserve for Capital Improvements to CIP 87-507 as follows: - 2 Contract amount plus 10% contingency $112,431 Budgeted amount 25,300 - Additional funds required $ 87,131 2. Drop the project. Respectfully submitted, Deborah . Murphy Assistant Engineer ur: Gayle .. Martin Interim City Manager DMM:mv kc/m -4� Concur: Anthony Antic Director ofblic WOrks Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copelan' Finance Administrator Attachments: Exhibit A: Engineer's Estimate Exhibit B: Project Schedule - 3 EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 pages. Resurfacing of Kelly Courts at Clark Field Engineer's Estimate CIP 87-507 Base Bid ITEM APPROX. QTY. UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST I. FENCING a. Demolition (existing fabric, 72 MH 30 2160 west side poles, lumber, etc.) b. Material: . _ Chain link fabric 480 LF 6.5 - 3120 End and line posts ***** ***** LS 2000 Top, middle and bottom rails ***** ***** LS' 2000- Misc. hardware ******* ***** LS 2000 c. Installation (labor) 200 MH _ 30 6000 d. Painting (labor and materials) ******* ***** LS - 3000 e. Furnish and install windscreen * LS 2000 f. Furnish and install Backboard ******* ***** LS 1000 g. Tennis court netting & hardware materials ******* ***** LS 1000 labor 16 MH 30 480 SUBTOTAL 24760 I1. RETAINING WALL a. Installation (labor) 120 LF 25 3000 b. Painting ******* ***** LS 1000 SUBTOTAL 4000 III. REMOVAL OF LIGHT POLES a. Removal of (4) light poles ******* ***** LS 1500 b. Restoring disturbed areas LS 300 SUBTOTAL 1800 IV. DRINKING FOUNTAIN a. Materials b. Labor - c. Demolition of existing 1 unit ******* ***** ******* ***** LS 1000 LS 1000 LS 500 SUBTOTAL 2500 V. RESURFACING ALTERNATIVE #1 a. Crack filler (Labor and materials) ***** LS 1000 b. Asphalt overlay materials * Fabric and tack coat 14500 SF 0.5 7250 * Asphalt 140 TON 110 15400 * Labor 96 MH 40 3840 *Equipment ******* ***** LS 7000 . c. Acrylic Surfacing System labor & materials 14500 SF 0.35 5000 VI. MISC. COSTS ******* ***** LS SUBTOTAL 39490 2000 SUBTOTAL 2000 TOTAL 74550 10% CON TINGENCY 7455 GRAND TOTAL 82005 Resurfacing of Kelly Courts at Clark Field CIP 87-507 ITEM I. FENCING a. Demolition (existing fabric, west side poles, Lumber, etc.) b. Material: Chain link fabric End and line posts Top, middle and bottom rails Misc. hardware c. Installation (labor) d. Painting (labor and materials) e. Furnish and install windscreen f. Furnish and install Backboard g. Tennis court netting & hardware materials labor II. RETAINING WALL a. Installation (labor) b. Painting III. REMOVAL OF LIGHT POLES a. Removal of (4) light poles b. Restoring disturbed areas IV. DRINKING FOUNTAIN a. Materials b. Labor c. Demolition of existing EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 2 pages. Engineer's Estimate Alternate Bid October 1987 APPROX. QTY. UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL COST V. RESURFACING ALTERNATIVE #2 a. Crack filler (labor and materials) b. Acrylic Surfacing System labor & materials VI. MISC. COSTS 72 MH 120 LF ******* ***** 1 unit ******* ***** ******* ***** 14500 SF ******* ***** 30 2160 6.5 3120 LS 2000 LS 2000 LS 2000 30 6000 LS 3000 LS 2000 LS 1000 LS 1000 30 480 SUBTOTAL 24760 25 3000 LS 1000 SUBTOTAL 4000 LS 1500 LS 300 SUBTOTAL 1800 LS 1000 LS 1000 LS 500 SUBTOTAL 2500 LS 1000 0.35 5000 LS SUBTOTAL 6000 2000 SUBTOTAL 2000 TOTAL 41060 10% CON TINGENCY 4106 GRAND TOTAL 45166 Exhibit 8: CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME :'► cdocittr 'er/I'`«' C/PS7-567 ACCOUNT NUMBER : /Z -5--41-C)1 - $507- ¢ZO/ LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : ®rte a ® a ACTUAL SCHEDULE X : 100% COMPLETE 1 TASKS JAN FEB 1 MAR 1 APR 1 1 MAY JUN JUL AUG I SEP _LOCT-I NOV I DEC I I I 1 nn111u1 Final design approval before advertising I I for construction I I______�__ � 1 I 1111 Prepare advertisement & set bid opening date I. )_ - 1 nilunnli Advertising period (issue addendums as necessary) I I I__,.,,__I I 1111 Accept sealed bids & public bid opening 1 1 1 I- -� 1 111111 Review bids / 988 1 11111 I r I I 1 Award contract Sign contract (bonds insurance & workers comp. cert.) Preconstruction meeting procedure Issue "Notice to Proceed" Construction Period Monitor progress & maintain records Progress payment and change order procedure Acceptance of work as complete Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" Retention Payment Project closeout I I I I 1111111 '1 October 6, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of October 13, 1987 INFORMATIONAL UPDATE TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVE HOURS OF OPERATION FOR CITY DEPARTMENTS RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND: On July 14, 1987 notice was given to the City Council of the in- tent of Management, at the request of the Teamster Union, to con- sider alternative hours of operation for City departments. At that time it was stated that the City was going to further explore the feasibility of an alternate schedule. The alterna- tive which is being considered is a 4/10 schedule (four days per week, ten hours per day). Since that July 14th meeting the following has occurred; a survey was conducted which elicited responses from "city service users", other communities with alternative schedules were contacted, and negotiations have continued with Teamster Union representatives. ANALYSIS: The results of the survey conducted (attached) indicate that 70% of those citizens responding (N=416) would prefer to have City Hall opened for extended hours (i.e. earilier than 8:00 a.m. and/ or after 5:00 p.m.). The percentage of respondents prefering the current hours of operation for City Hall was 17%. The survey results also indicated that Monday through Thursday were the preferred days to have access to City departments. An alternative 4/10 schedule would allow for City Hall to remain open from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday (open through lunch). Negotiations have been completed with the Teamsters regarding the labor impact of the 4/10 schedule on City Hall operations (i.e., vacations, overtime, and accrual utilization). In addition to City Hall functions, the feasibility of including Public Works and General Services field personnel on a four day per week is being addressed. Police Service Officers in the Police Depart- ment are currently on a six month trial period for the 4/10 schedule. 1ff Following completion of the negotiations regarding field opera- tions, a specific proposal will be submitted to the Council on October 27, 1987. That proposal will be a joint recommendation from the Management negotiating team and the Teamster Union to implement a 4/10 alternative schedule for a six month trial peri- od commencing November 30, 1987. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Administrator attachment cur: ay Int e T. Martin rim City Manager STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATE HOURS SURVEY (Based on City Hall public survey conducted August 10 thru September 11, 1987 - 416 Responses) 1) Percentage of respondents preferring extended hour/four day week = 70'/. A) Average number of "visits" to City Hall per year = 5.5 visits B) Percentage of Residents = 55X Percentage of Nonresidents = 37% Percentage declining to state = 3X 2) Percentage of respondents preferring current schedule = 17% A) Average number of "visits" to City Hall per month = 1.6 B) Percentage of Residents = 55% Percentage of Nonresidents = 37% Percentage declining to state = 4% 3) Percentage of respondents with no preference = 18% 4) Of those who prefer an extended hour/four-day week, which day of the current five-day schedule are they least likely to use City Hall? A) Monday = 16% B) Tuesday = 8'/. G) Wednesday = 15% D) Thursday = 3% E) Friday = 29% 5) If all seven days of the week were available, which days would the respondent prefer to have open (choosing 4 days) ? A) Monday = 55% B) Tuesday = 57X C) Wednesday = 59% D) Thursday = 62% E) Friday = 37% F) Saturday = 21'/. 6) Sunday = 6% 1 6) Percentage of respondents who would like City Hall to be open earlier than 8:00 a.m. A) 6:00 a.m. = 5% B) 6:30 a.m. = 2'/. C) 7:00 a.m. = 18% D) 7:30 a.m. = 6% E) No time stated = 42% 7) Percentage of respondents who would like -City Hall to be open later than 5:00 p.m. A) 5:30 p.m. = 5% B) 6:00 p.m. = 22% C) 6:30 p.rn. = 7'/. D) 7:00 p.m. = 24% E) No time stated = 28% 8) Percentage of respondents who would like City Hall to be open from 12:00 to 1:00 = 47/ Percentage of respondents who would not like City Hall to be open from 12:00 to 1:00 = 11% No preference = 32% Not responding = 3% 2 October 5, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council October 13, 1987 CDBG STATUS REPORT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended City Council exchange the City's remaining CDBG Funds with another city at a rate no less than $.60 on the dollar. BACKGROUND The City of Hermosa Beach has been in the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) since 1978. These federal funds are administered by, the Los Angeles Community Development Commission (L.A. CDC) and this is the agency the City of Hermosa Beach has been dealing with since 1978. In 1985, the then City Council decided to no longer participate - in this federal program. The present City Council reaffirmed that decision at the last City Council meeting of Sept. 22, 1987. ANALYSIS The City of Hermosa Beach has used CDBG funds for many projects in the City, one of which was the Community Center Rehab Project. All other CDBG projects have been (or shortly will be) successfully closed out. This one project continues to be a problem for the City as well as Los Angeles CDC. The Community Center Rehab Project was approved by L. A. CDC January, 1983. All contractors and the scope of work was approved at that time. As the project progressed, the City reallocated CDBG funds from other projects into the Community Center Rehab Project and proceeded to process the paper work with L.A. CDC. At the end of the rehab project, L. A. CDC decided the project was ineligible for funding. At that .point L.A. CDC had already reimbursed the City of Hermosa Beach $306,880. By the end of the project, L.A. CDC owed and still owes the City $252,491. Staff has been pursuing this reimbursement for the last three years using administrative measures and finally any political intervention that was or is available. The final result to date is a letter from L.A. CDC stating that the $360,880 that was already reimbursed is an approved expenditure. Please note Attachment A, letter dated July 9, 1987, from L. A. CDC. However, what was not in the correspondence of July 9, 1987, and what was verbally conveyed to staff at a meeting with Community Development Commission representatives on August 14, 1987, is - 1 igg, • that the remainder of funds that the City expended on the rehab project and for which we requested reimbursement ($253,128) will not be reimbursed. But, ironically, that same amount is available for the City to expend on any other project that meets CDBG guidelines. In staff's opinion it would be ludicrous for the City to expend money on another project as that would simply result in the City spending the money twice and being reimbursed only once. In an effort to finalize this project, staff is recommending the City exchange its remaining funds with another City. Please refer to Attachment B. Attachment B reflects the rates of exchange and indicates the approximate amount of funds the City would realize. In exchanging funds with another City, Hermosa Beach will receive funds that can be allocated per the wishes of the City Council with no restrictions. But in doing so, City Council must realize an exchange of funds will result in funding that is less than the $253,128. Again, please refer to Attachment B. Staff feels all other avenues have been exhausted except one, and that is litigation. If the City Council wishes to pursue that course of action, staff would suggest the matter be discussed at closed session. Attachment C gives an historical perspective on the project. Please note, and it is not on the attachment, but the project was completed in January, 1984 and the City received notification on April 25, 1984, that the eligibility of the entire project was being questioned by HUD. Respectfully submitted, Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources ncur: Gayle . Martin Inter m City Manager Da" id •" l 1111(1 L. utire I)irr-r lur • ATTACHMENT A Community Development Commission County of Los Angeles Commissioners ftichacl 1). Antono,icl- Chairman Peter r. Schabarum 1 436 Cnuulr is h !Soule al d • Comms tcw.(•alilot nia 90022* i213) 725-742'2 Kenneth Hahn Edmund D. Edelman Deane Dana `C July 9, 1987 Mr. Gregory T. Meyer, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 902524 Dear Mr. Meyer: Enclosed is a letter from HUD announcing their decision1A'regar ding the expenditure of $360,889 by your City on the Hermosa Beach Community Center (Project #82C.262). We arhappy that this matter hos been brought to a closure, but please refer to the content of the letter as to the rationale for approving the expenditures. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 725-7339. In addition, we will be glad to work with your staff in identifying eligible activities which your City could implement with your remaining balance of CDBG funds. Sincerely, CARLOS JAC N, Director Community •evelopment Block Grant Division CJ:sm Enclosure M=� • JUL 7 1987 • JL '87 JUL -8 N) :55 David N. Lund Executive Director Community Development Commission 1436 Goodrich Boulevard Commerce, CA 90022 Dear Mr. Lund: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Los Angeles Office. Region IX 1615 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90015-3801 SUBJECT: Hermosa Beach Community Center Program No. B -85 -MC -06-0505 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) My staff has thoroughly reviewed the information submitted to justify CDBG expenditures for the renovation of the,:1Iermosa Beach Community Center. As you may recall, the eligibility of the activity was questioned when it was apparent that the CDBG dollars were pri- marily used for the renovation of the auditorium, lobby and adjoining restrooms and the City was unable tQ prove low and moderate income benefit. My staff recommended that compliance with CDBG national objectives might be established through determination of a blighted structure or "spot blight" (24 CFR 570.901)(b)(2)(ii), CDBG regulations). The material reviewed was the second information package submitted to HUD to justify compliance with this program benefit objec- tive. Although the material submitted dc3s not include a work write-up or cost estimate which can relate required work items with code violations, my staff has attempted to synthesize tb,e.observations of the architect and building department, Table 1: Deficiencies and Code Requirements", the table of "Community Center Construction Expenditures" and the copies of the,Baxter-David contract and change orders. Using some estimating techniques, HUD staff has generously concluded that the $360,889 CDBG funds already expended could have been used to correct basic code deficiencics which would support a designation of spot blight for the Community Center. I must say that our estimation is without the benefit of the City's work write-up or drawings which were not submitted. Our estimate has taken into consideration only what might have been expended to correct City code .4 r 2 -items and has eliminated any items which would be considered design features of the work completed. Since our estimate is actually less than the $360,889 already expended, I feel our acceptance of costs -is a generous allowance. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please -contact Karen Potts, Community Planning and Development Representative, at (213) 251-7248. Sincerely, erbert Robe s Director Community Planning and Development Diiion, 9.4C • ATTACHMENT B RATES OF EXCHANGE At a rate of exchange at $.60 ori the dollar, the City would receive $151,876 or $101,251 less than the full amount. At a rate of exchange at $.65 on the dollar, the City would receive $164,533 or $88,594 less than the full amount. At a rate of exchange at $.75 on the dollar, the City would receive $189,846 or $63,282 less than the full amount. At a rate of exchange at $.80 on the dollar, the City would receive $202,502 or $50,625 less than the full amount. kj 1 MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC. January 22, 1986 ATTACHMENT C • • Ms. Alana Mastrian City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Subject: Synopsis of Community Center Events Dear Alana: Based on a review of the records I have been able to find, enclosed.=s a synopsis of events pertaining to the acquisition and rehabilitation • of the Community Center. I have also enclosed copies of some of the more critical documents related to this issue. It is important to note that the City has completed three separate income surveys of Community Center users and that almost two years have transpired since the issue was first raised by HUD. The City has now been asked to pursue an alternative method of qualifying the project -- alleviation of slum and blight. The situation obviously needs to be resolved as quickly as possible. As it now stands, the City has been reimbursed for $360,889 of the project costs with $252,491 being withheld by the CDC pending resolution of the project's eligibility. The City has a standing request, for reimbursement. The CDC has not processed the final MOU Amendment (#3) which would permit reimbursement for the final costs. I hope this information assists you in your efforts. Please call me fyI can provide further assistance. Sincerely, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC. Robb Steel CDBG Consultant RS:jg Enc. d: HB II Diamond Bar Executive Park • 712 N. Diamond Bar Boulevard • .1' • Diamond Bar, California 91765 • (818) 912-5321 (714) 594-2943 f SYNOPSIS OF EVENTS COMMUNITY CENTER'PROJECT DATE ACTION • ACQUISITION May 15, 1976 May 5, 1977 May 12, 1977 June 22, 1977 August 16, 1977 October 11, 1977 City submitted project to acquire Pier Avenue School to County of Los Angeles Department of Community Development. CDBG Funding was initially $70,578. HUD questions the eligibility of the Pier Avenue Scho61 Acquisition Project, stating that only 38.percent of the residents of Census Tract 6211 (the project site) are lower income. City responds with letter from nod Merl to Sesto Chi' L'ello of the County that census tracts outside the city should be included in the service area and that these tracts are predomiRantly lower income. Letter from County of Los Angeles indicates that the project has been granted conditional approval. The City has 60 days to qualify the activity under the CDBG Regulations or reprogram the funds. City responds by indicating that the nature of services provided by the Center will insure benefit to low and moderate income persons. The City states that it will assure that the tenant mix benefits 50% or more low and moderate income persons by controlling the final mix of users. Memorandum from Rod Merl to Earl Diller states that the Third Year CDBG Contract requires that the City "select a final mix of users for the facility that will insure that at least 50`%'x --of the users shall be persons of low and moderate income." November•4, 1977 Second Amendment to Contract increases funding to $275,101. The City subsequently acquired the site using CDBG and other funds. REHABILITATION FY 1981-32 City submits Community Center Rehabilitation Project S1C.262 for approval. CDBG Funding is $169,083. Decomber, 1982 City submits new Project 82C.262 which combines $169,088 previously allocated to 81C.262 with $152,155 additional CDBG funding. Project purpose is to restore the .Community Center. Project was approved by CDC on January 19, 1983. DATE ACTION May 23, 1983 May -June, 1983 August 11, 1983 *Fall, 1983 *Fall, 1983 January 13, 1984 April 10, 1984 County CDC approves Amendment #1 adding.$.52,000 CDBG Funding to the Project. Project CDBG Funding now tdt is $373,243. City conducts its first user survey and finds that an estimated 51.5 percent of the beneficiaries are low and moderate income. County CDC approves Amendment #2 extending the time of performance to June 30, 1984. City submits a letter to County Supervisor Deane Dana•fFequesting his support in securing a waiver of CDBG Regulations Which do not permit installation of a fire hydrant to support the' Community Center Rehabilitation Project. Supervisor Deane Dana submits a waiver request to HUD on behalf of the City. s-�= Ignacio Galindo of IHUD responds that the fire hydrant project cannot be approved based on compliance with CDBG Program Regulations and that his office had not been granted authority to approve a waiver. The waiver request would be forwarded to the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development. Further, 1 -IUD questions the eligibility of the Community Center Rehabilitation Project, stating that it does not appear to qualify under the CDBG Program Regulations. City submits Amendment #3 to Project 82C.262 adding $240,137 for a total project budget of $613,380. CDC denies approval of Amendment pending resolution of eligibility concerns and low- and moderate -income benefit test. CDC also refuges to process further reimbursement requests for this project. CDC withholds $252,491. April 25, 1984 City receives letter from Barbara Bell King of the CDC which accompanies a letter dated April 17, 1984, from MUD to Deane Dana. In short, the letters confirm that the waiver cannot he approved and that the eligibility of the Community Center Rehabilitaiton Project itself is in question. The City is instructed to provide evidence that the project meets one of thc..statutory objectives of the CDBG Program, principally benefit to low- and moderate -income persons. June, 1984 The City meets with the tenants of the Community Center to establish the low and moderate income character of their clientele. * I did not have a copy of the letters in the file although I have seen there. DATE • ACTION July 12, 1984 City submits documentation that the benefit to low and moderate income persons was an estimated 7396 base d`,'bn the .interviews with the Center's tenants. August 29, 1984 CDC submits letter of justification to Herb.Roberts of HUD. The letter contends that the City's efforts to promote the Community Center as a service center for the disadvantaged fulfills the intent of the CDBG Program. December 6, 1984 Herb Roberts of HUD -LA .responds that HUD cannot accept the City's documentation of low and moderate income ?enefit. HUD suggests that the City conduct an income survey which will result in more specific, quantifiable documentation of benefit to low- and moderate -income persons. February -March 1985 City conducts a one month survey of all GRriimunity Center users. The results show a benefit to low- and moderate -income persons of 51.5 percent. May 7, 1985 City submits letter to the CDC documenting the survey results. The City also committed to adopt affirmative policies to ensure benefit to low- and moderate -income persons. May 29, 1985 CDC submits City's letter of May 7, 1985, to HUD requesting that the City's efforts to qualify the Community Center Project be approved based on benefit to low- and moderate -income persons. November , 1985 HUD responds that the documentation of low/moderate benefit still cannot be accepted and suggests that the City try and qualify the activity under the slum and blight national,,..objective, rather than benefit to low- and moderate -income persons. d: HB II r ,, t R October 1, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of Of the City Council October 13, 1987 FILM PERMIT POLICY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff that City Council not amend the present film permit policy. (Attachment A) BACKGROUND At the City Council meeting of September 22, 1987, Council requested that staff report back on possible revisions to policy in response to a citizen complaint that film activity did not close up until 3:00 a.m. Council also requested to know how many times this has been happening (filming). By way of introduction, the increase in film activity in Hermosa Beach has been a direct result of efforts by Council and staff to cooperate in the State of California's -efforts to keep location film production in the State. In response to the alarming rate of i'runaway film productions" (productions that go outside California to do their location shooting), the State of California established the California Film Office in 1985 to work with the film industry and municipalities in an effort to "keep location filming at home." The reason for the State's response is that the motion picture industry is its fourth largest, employing an estimated 75,000 to 80,000 directly in the Los Angeles Basin area and accountable for generating $5 billion in revenue for the state annually. The industry lists as primary "reasons for leaving," California municipalities' slow, uncoordinated permit processing, multiple jurisdictional policies and rules, costly fees and public resistance. Coupled with other states who aggressively market for "on location" filming (recognizing the revenue building potential of the activity) with incentives such as free permit processing, free police services, free hotels and cooperative attitudes, the result has been an estimated $1 billion loss in production dollars in California annually since 1985. Therefore, the California Film Office and SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments) have extended requests to Los Angeles Basin municipalities to "do their part" to ease the film permit process. The City of Hermosa Beach cooperated by adopting the recommended permit form, (attached) by requiring only 48 hour advance notice for film activity, by reducing fees from $1,000 to $500 per day and by sending photo files (a collection of pictures highlighting the cities best locations for potential filming) to the State office. 1 lhh The result has been an average of 30 filming days per year since 1983. Last fiscal year (1986-87), the total number of filming days in Hermosa was 26. The City collected permit fees totaling $14,200, Police Department fees of $11,165 and Parking fees of $1,668 for a grand total of $27,033. This fiscal year, there have been 12 filming days to date drawing permit fees of $5,000 (Police Department and parking fees to be determined). The film activity in question was "Wipeout Productions" which filmed from dusk to dawn for seven days (Sept. 21 - Sept. 30). ANALYSIS To address the citizen complaint on "Wipeout Productions" it is notable that the ten day film activity resulted in only three citizen complaints. In all three cases, staff and the film company were able to solve the problem(s). Specifically, three generators were moved from Lot C to the base of the Pier and film crew trucks were removed from Lot F where they bothered the complaining resident (noise). When we receive a complaint, staff responds by verifying the problem and solving it immediately. _We generally follow-up the complaint with a return phone call to insure that the problem has been solved to the citizen's satisfaction. One of the three citizens who complained called our office the next day to thank staff and the film company for responding so quickly to his complaint. On the issue of revising our policy to restrict filming hours, it seems important to note that filming activity by its very nature, demands maximum flexibility (within safe limits) in order to survive. Most film permit requests encompass some nighttime hours as they need to maximize production at each location and because they need to film at night, in the morning and even an occasional sunrise. City staff, including the Community Resources and the Police Department monitor each film permit and activity to insure that citizens and businesses are not unduly inconvenienced or disturbed. Due to the magnitude of the activity, on occasion this means responding to a citizen complaint and changing the set-up as needed. (Notably an average film draws 2-3 complaints). If a film takes place in an area that will affect residences or businesses, in most cases, they receive written notification from the film company about the activity with phone numbers (City and film company) they can call if they have any problems. With staff in gear to address complaints and mitigate potential filming problems, it seems that adding restrictions to the existing permit would be counterproductive and unnecessary. If we react to each citizen complaint with policy changes, we will create a restrictive permit form --precisely the kind the industry and California Film Office wish we would avoid. It is clear that the central issue at hand is whether or not the City will continue in its role as advocating film activity and in lending a cooperative contribution to the "greater cause" for the State. To date, Hermosa Beach has established quite a reputation for a 1.3 square mile city in terms of being cooperative, responsive and receptive to filmmakers. If the City wishes to continue in this vein, it must be with the understanding that production companies generaly DO NOT tip toe in and out of town and that on occasion, they will pose problems --problems that can and are, for the most part, solved. A representative from the California Film Commission will be present for the Council meeting and would like to address City Council on the issue of location filming in California. Other Alternatives available to City Council are: 1. Impose hours of operation for filming and/or other restrictions. 2. Rescind the Filming Permit entirely and not allow filming in the City of Hermosa Beach. Concur: a14-$tA-.7( Alana-M. Mastrian, Director Det. of Commuity Resources '. i -6-73t----- fGalye . Martin Interim City Manager Respectf y submitted, Mary ney, Coordinator Dep of Community Resources Attachment A DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES 710 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 376-6984 EXTENSION 280 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FILMING PERMIT ORGANIZATION'S NAME: PERSON(S) IN CHARGE: ADDRESS: CITY PRODUCTION TITLE: ACTIVITY: PHONE STATE ZIP CODE DATE(S): TIME(S): LOCATION(S): TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS: PYROTECHNICS: ANIMALS: TOTAL PERSONNEL: AUTOS: TRUCKS: PARKING NEEDS: OTHER: SIF YOU ARE EMPLOYING MINORS OR USING ANIMALS IN YOUR PRODUCTION, THERE MAY BE GOVERNMENTAL AGENGIES YOU MUST CONTACT. PLEASE INQUIRE. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES PERMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: FEES, CHARGES, AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS: DAILY PERMIT FEE POLICE COSTS FIREMAN COSTS BUSINESS LICENSE (MONTHLY) OTHER COSTS: TOTAL COSTS ALL COSTS TO BE PAID PRIOR TO EVENT: YES NO PERMITTEE AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND TO MAINTAIN THE PREMISES IN GOOD CONDITION AND TO RETURN PREMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. UNLESS GREATER OR LESSER COVERAGE IS REQUIRED, APPLICANT AGREES TO FURNISH THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EVIDENCE OF $1 MILLION COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE IN THE FORM OF A CERTIFICATE, COVERING THE ENTIRE PERIOD OF THIS PERMIT, NAMING THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND ITS EMPLOYEES AS ADDITIONAL INSUREDS. EXPIRATION DATE . PERMITTEE WAIVES CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES, FOR FEES OR DAMAGES CAUSED BY, ARISING OUT OF, OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THE EXERCISE OF THIS PERMIT. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES PERMIT I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES, AND OTHER NECESSARY MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND/OR FURNISHED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AS MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTH PARTIES. FILM COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE DATE TYFITTITENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES V DATE POLICE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DATE Revised 7/1/87 City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 376-6984 extension 280 or 379-3312 CITY REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL FILM MAKING All applicants desiring a permit to film must comply with all conditions set forth below, prior to final approval by the Department of Community Resources. I. General Information/Fees: 1. Submit the following information at least 48 in advance of desired filming date: a. A request to film within the City. b. Site of proposed filming. c. Date and time of proposed filming. d. Duration of time needed. c. Name of Movie Company, their address, city, phone number. e. Number of people that will be involved. In some instances, more than 48 hours notification will be necessary to make permit arrangements. 2. Completion of an application to reserve facilities. 3. Costs: A. Filming 1. Permit Fee $ 500 per day* Allows filming in any location approved in Hermosa Beach. 'After the first 10 days of filming per fiscal year, Permit Fee is $250 per day. 2. Business License Fee $ 200 per month B. Commercial Still Photo rg aphy $ 50 per day 4. Secure and submit to Director of Department of Community Resources a certificate of insurance in the amount of $1 million dollars NAMING "The City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees as additional insured." 5. All costs to be paid prior to filming. 6. If City services are required, the City may impose additional fees. 7. That the City be recognized in the credits as the location site for filming. 8. Any costs incurred by the City due to the activity will be assumed by the organization renting the facility. 9. The City may impose additional terms depending ori the activity. Those costs will be assumed by the organization renting the facility. 10. THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES WILL EXPEDITE ALL ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN THE FILM COMPANY AND THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. CERTAIN FILM REQUESTS WILL REQUIRE POLICE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL. B. Parking Requests/Fees: 1. Due to mandatory 24 hours posting on reserved parking slots, requests for parking must be made NO LATER than 48 hours in advance of the filming date(s). 2. The buy-out fee for City -operated metered parking slots is $10 per slot per day. C. Rules For Filming in Hermosa Beach: 1. All members of production crews must wear I.D. tags while operating in Hermosa Beach. 2. It is the film company's responsiblity to notify all impacted residents and businesses of the filming activity. Any objections from businesses or residents must be reported to the Department of Community Resources by the film company. 3. No major intersections can be blocked during City rush hours, 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays. Revised 7/1/87 October 5, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 13, 1987 RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A LOADING ZONE ON 2ND STREET FOR USE BY LOCAL MERCHANTS Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve and adopt the attached resolution (Exhibit A) establishing a twenty minute loading -zone (7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. any, .day except ,Sundays .and holidays) at .the following location: ". 2nd Street _''on -the.north ..•, curb from 60' west of Pacific Coast Highway to '165' '"west 'of ` Pacific Coast Highway. Background: A representative frons' Vasek .Polak Porsche, located at, 199 Pacific Coast;' Highway,'recently \requested that' a :.loading .zone, be -,r. installed ;on;2nd Street, 'adjacent(to.'theirbusin'ess. t(Exhibit`,B) This would provide; a. total .of, 85':i of,,loadang? zone:)This' ;request' was based upon the fact that •there are no loading zones in this area. Analysis: A field investigation revealed the:.following: 1. There are no loading zones in this area. 2. This loading zone can be used by all the merchants in this area. Vehicles parked in the loading zone for longer than twenty minutes may be cited by parking enforcement. Vehicles making deliveries from other than the designated loading zones (i.e., 2nd Street) may be cited for, impeding traffic. (VC 22400A). Section 21458 of the California Vehicle Code indicates that curbing be painted yellow "for the purpose of loading or unloading passengers or,freight forsuch time as may be specified by local Ordinance." ,See attached `E•xhibit,"C". Fiscal Impact': ,City .Ordinance .No. 84=..762 '(Jtily 1984) , pr.ovi.des. •for;: a loading; zone.; in front •of a •particular business provided that ,the merchant •' • absorb the. cost .", Thea cost, i •s as follows„:. ; • 'y • Survey. :$100-:00 nstallation 250.00 $350.00 - 1 - 213 ,,�•ry �o, ry,,, •, qy,• .1 v��:.,.,a ��..l: •'Sep,•?1,yn,r;l.�,.iv..•.XpV;,4`y,,:.,1�...a �,p,,P'.':r P;,t.r rr •a �._��x., .,; ,, iro yr: s h Plus $100.00 per year maintenance fee. There are no parking meters at the proposed loading zone location so there will be no lost revenue to the City. Respectfully submitted, a4' 4(-p27-- Ga'ry 'eaton Engineering Technician cur:. 4)6;_ ay114 T. Martin Int lm City Manager Concur: Anthony Antich Director of Publ:c Works cc: Jon, Noon, General Services,Director Steye Wilstiew'ski'Publid,'Sa6ty Director ';•), 3•1 '‘ loadRr f• ) ' • ,• • • , , • s ,• ' • t• k' , 'AP'‘el.' 3,n . • . -2- 1 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 f, ;1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2_ RESOLUTION NO. 87- f/v/i-del A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. N. S. 2435, AS AMENDED BY ADDING THERETO A TWENTY MINUTE PARKING RESTRICTION ON A CERTAIN SECTION OF SECOND STREET AS HEREIN SET FORTH. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECION 1. That Resolution No. N. S. 2435, as amended shall 'be and is hereby. further'amended by,; addir'rg ,thfo11,owing subsection to Section 9, Loading Zones. Section 9.93 Second Street: On. the north curb between a point 60'„ to J165 ' west of" Paci,f is Coast ghway.� Loading •zones,-t'p be;;ipdicat'ed by: ye11 ow pa�ht'. ,c `T' zne ] m ' ef,te'ptive ,.bet�v eri , the,: h9urs iof 7 •OQ. 'am �: ,td. 6:00$:m. `bf4`; ny, �• '. day, ,excluding'Sundays and holidays, providing that such loading and unloading shall not con- sume more than twenty minutes. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED.this 13th.day of October, 1987. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: it. „City Clerk :City Attorney 271 28 .]/.d 5a Yid, • ,...,a;/J`yv,p.,..�: nYl t�t9„'••,.rl's`•�toN,•yi..,U:na��:.;y'tsp;,.T»xp�,`r.�r•,9,•;.!'p7 T,.')'!�:'U 'il9:p vY ir��`•p>I'4h'i�E..: ye�>, -r t'r !.,, r'�,?' • F. Cf1-1. CITY OF IletWOM 8E1K11), CIVIC CENTER HERMOS; BEACH CALIFORNIA 90 2 5 4 CITY HALL: (213) 376-6984 POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS: 376-7981 <1-1 ITA3 ?ND. STREf-T .• • • • , , i5EP -'10 • :f',," A•, ••• "•-,>• • . • 11 . • • • ' • , .• • . • Ltliti.D.! N4.6. 4,• . . "ik.\•••,vizTv • ••;11 ",••7 • If .•.••• , • T)... • .1 ,N• •.1.. 3., •.‘•••13••• Ps• r's,' .47,0 "A: • 41..1) J•••..,11 ?P.,N1Z,P14 •••••1•1; • • .9,•,••••);:,?:•1(.•,i t• 7. J7r?vyz,•,‘,),), rp,) ig •: •,'•)• 7 A:r ,•,•/S.••• •,•'1 3 Exhibit "C" § 19-86 MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC §, 19-87 •,, , ,4. • ; Sec. 19-86. Saine—Passenger loading zones to be indicated by white paint. •Passenger loading -zones shall be indicated by white paint upon the top of all curbs in such zones. (Ord. No. 238 N. S., § 12) • .. • , • • • •i , • Sef..1:9787..c140,'Inarking4A.uthority,ineaninp • ".;• .k‘ • •.• • • • .b. • !..• . • • ,t". • ;;• 10e. cit3i.tra'ffie.,en.g'iner is .lierebk.'authO4Zed,.fsubjecf•to• the iiroviSioni and' limitatidns'of this 'chaptei, to place and; when required by this chapter, shall place the following curb markings to indicate parking or standing regulations and such curb markings shall have the meanings set forth: Red. -No stopping, standing or parking at .any time, except as-permittedpy .the State Vehicle Code and except that a bus may stop in ared zone marked or signed as a bus zone. Yellow. No stopping, standing or parking at any time be- tween 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. of any day except Sundays and holidays for any purpose other than the loading or un- loading of passengers or materials; provided, that the loading or unloading of passengers shall not consume more than three minutes, nor the loading or unloading of materials more than twenty minutes. -• .1 •?., • . (.1( •. \ • ; • . • sState law reference—Curb markings indicating parking regulations, Veh. C. A., § 21458. Supp. No. 12-69 264.1 '? • • fl '',.,'JJ / .,‘••,..ie MV:hi.Por'41”,, 7.-11.,t, , •••:'?I:. t .. . • • e• 7) /. : 0, r•,,, •, .1 ...1, , :1... 1..., / ,•:,, ;.• r,.,.,... ,44,),,,..,,,,.,1 •,1...0s0,,,,,...., Ix, 0 ; i 1 , ...„, j-4,., 0 ?,,,,,),,,,E bp ,,;:. 7 ,,,•,. , /., ,••,,,,,,,,,,',.,,,,f).. -3,,,,i tD,,),4,..,>,•,v).,,,,s,„ „r„,,, ,,,,,,,,-, ., ,...,,,,,,,, September 30, 1987 City Council Meeting October 13, 1987 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 87-906 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW SECTION 2-4.1 ENTITLED "REGULATIONS GOVERNING EMPLOYEE INSURANCE PROVISIONS." Resubmitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 87-906 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of September 22, 1987, this ordinance was reintroduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Rosenberger, Simpson, Mayor Cioffi DeBellis, Williams None None Ka hleen Midstokke, City Clerk Concur: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 87-906 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW SECTION 2-4.1 ENTITLED 'REGULATIONS GOVERNING EMPLOYEE INSURANCE PROVISIONS' WHEREAS, there is a need to clarify the process for handling and administering the various forms of insurance available to City employees; and, WHEREAS, as a result of civil litigation the City has em- barked on a process of employee certification of insurance eligibility; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That a new Section 2-4.1 of the Municipal Code entitled "Regulations Governing Employee Insurance Provisions' i created to read as follows: All employees, be they civil service, appointed or elected, who- receive an insurance benefit from the City shall complete an Insurance Certification Statement, under penalty of perjury, be- fore application for such coverages may be filed with the respec tive insurance providers. The purpose of such Certification is to ensure that each employee is aware of the eligibility require ments for each type of insurance and that the employee attests t eligivility for same. Upon hire, a new employee shall provide a copy of a marriage certificate validating a spousal dependent and a copy of a birth certificate or guardianship documents for each child dependent for which insurance coverage is sought. The Personnel Department shall be responsible for obtaining the Certification Statement from each new affected employee and 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 shall maintain the original Statement in the employee's personnel file. There shall be no processing of any request for insurance until such Statement is on file." SECTION 2. That prior to the expiration of fifteen days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective thirty days after final adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of October, 1987. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY 2 October 5, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council October 13, 1987 SUBJECT: GP 87-2, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR THIRD QUARTER, 1987 LOCATIONS: REFER TO ATTACHED MAP AND EXHIBITS A THROUGH K INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION LIAISON: CHUCK SHELDON Recommendation THe Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the attached resolution be adopted amending the General Plan in 11 areas in the northwest sector of the City. Abstract Changing the General Plan designation for the subject areas will (1) create consistency between the General Plan and Zoning, (2) bring the City closer to regaining its Permit Authority from the Coastal Commission, and (3) reduce the potential for increased density in the City. Analysis The analysis for the proposed Amendments is in the attached Staff Report to the Planning Commission. Attachments 1. Staff Report with Map of subject area, dated 9/1/87. 2. Proposed City Council Resolution. 3. Resolution P.C. 87- 4. Planning Commission Minutes of 9/1/87. Re pe ctfully7subpitte , CUR: Gayle . Martin Interim City Manager 1 ichae Schu ach Planning Director Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: LOCATIONS: SPECIFIC CHANGES: August 25, 1987 Regular Meeting of September 1, 1987 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR THIRD QUARTER, 1987 REFER TO ATTACHED MAP EXISTING AREA ZONE 1 2 C-2 R-1 3 C-1 4 R-1 5 R-1 6 C-1 7 C-1 8 C-1 9 R-1 10 R-1 11 R-1 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN HIGH DENSITY MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL INITIATED BY PLANNING STAFF PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN GENERAL COMMERCIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Recommendation Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution recommending approval of the above General Plan Amendments. 2 c Background As part of the on-going program to obtain consistency between the General Plan and zoning, and to regain permit authority from the Coastal Commission, the above noted areas are being recommended for amendment. Analysis In examining the General Plan Housing Element and Land Use Element, the goal to control density and have greater concern for the quality of the environment is evident. The Housing Element states "Minimizing the number of new housing units which are built so as to avoid exacerbating the already high residential density of the Community". It also states that the policy "to endorse a preference for an assessment of environmental impacts generated by residential proposals having significance at the neighborhood or community levels", should be implemented. The Land Use Element, amended in 1979, lowered the number of housing units from 46 per acre to 40 in the High Density areas. More recently, the Land Use Element was amended to lower density in those areas from 40 to 33 units per acre. When examining the Land Use Map in regard to density and zoning, a significant pattern emerges; many areas which are zoned R-1, for example, are designated Medium Density, and areas which are zoned R-2, are designated Low Density. If these designations were implemented, in the ideal sense, there would be lesser density in Low Densityareas and higher density in the High Density areas. Therefore, what these changes accomplish in regard to density is negligible; they simply balance each other. And in the realistic sense, the High Density areas will rise, and the Low Density areas will generally stay at the same density into the foreseeable future which is contrary to the goal of limiting density. Another significant aspect is the non -conforming issue. It is somewhat senseless to change zoning based on the General Plan which, on the one hand, accomplishes nothing in regard to density and on the other hand, will result in non -conformity. A final• aspect is Proposition EE which was passed by the voters in 1981. This advisory vote stated that where there was conflict between the General Plan and zoning, the lower density should prevail. 3 Because of the above factors, Staff believes that the General Plan should be amended in those areas which are designated to a higher density than the zoning would allow, or in regard to commercial areas, have land uses which would not be allowed under the current General Plan designation. Therefore, Staff's recommended amendments will change the General Plan designations for the various areas to conform with the current zoning, and thus lower future density. , Michael Schubach Planning Director THIRD QUARTER GENERAL . PLAN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS : 67' .. .1. 1..111 R•2 R-2 R•2 AK+aAw t. }: R. R-3 .'R-3 R•7 R•3 a R2 2 1 1 AY[. R• '1' 1.'�: 11[41,0!11 NORTHWEST . SECTOR ry •rpyMr. ' 7 if AEA -DSA n Ry • Ry • r. r. R•2 i e = a t 0 � v i + ► r � t � r COW + O nflyw4r C-] R -I R:1 OS AAA[ •A.p "Ion, .AAAA.. 11 AAAA mm Y IR rte 1St R-] ArfMYt g 1•i§'a.i1", 1;��%h�,... :iihi:". :L�Iyy h.'+bt ,>4,�.1 Tyb�vYr ;i;. 114:Athlf�v:i� 1.5 •(•'.. .. .^ � AAAA .. . 7.A%'... �. ..n Eta •"4".4741... 1l�r2'i .)..' •G /�C�' is >,.+: •I �� argil i R-2 mot,rrnrr R-2 R-1 R•L V .�M�`• a 2 VV` `' I';�A�')'V':l;7,• R•3 4,901:600421.112: ' 1R.3 111 a tela altr r � R-] w ya N atimi„ - 4 M(y•1 1 R -2B R-3 SPA 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 87- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN MAP FOR THOSE AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS, EXHIBITS A THROUGH K, AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on October 13, 1987 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following, Findings: A. The proposed amendments to the General Plan Map will further the goal of limiting density in the community; B. Changing the current General Plan designation for the subject areas will result in consistency between the General Plan and zoning; C. These amendments are a part of the City's attempt to regain its Permit Authority from the Coastal Commission; D. Redesignating NW Area I from High Density Residential to General Commercial will be consistent with general useage of the Area; E. Redesignating NW Area II from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential will result in less dense future development; F. Redesignating NW Area III from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial will be consistent with general useage of the Area; G. Redesignating NW Area. IV from Medium density Residential to Low Density Residential will result in less dense future development; H. Redesignating NW Area. V from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential will result in less dense future development; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. Redesignating Neighborhood useage of the J. Redesignating Neighborhood useage of the K. Redesignating Neighborhood useage of the L. Redesignating NW Area VI from Medium density Residential to Commercial will be consistent with general Area; NW Area VII from High Density Residential to Commercial will be consistent with general Area; NW Area VIII from Medium Density Residential to Commercial will be consistent with general Area; NW Area from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential will result in less dense future development; M. Redesignating NW Area X from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential will result in less dense future development; N. Redesignating NW Area XI from Medium Density Residential to Low density Residential will result in less dense future developement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby amend the general Plan Map to redesignate the following Areas as shown on the attached maps, Exhibits A through K, and approvs an Environmental Negative Declaration. NW Area I (Exhibit A): Redesignate from High Density Residential to General Commercial. This Area is legally described as Lots 27, and 29, Block 16, Hermosa Beach Tract. NW Area II (Exhibit B): Redesignate Residential to Low Density Residential. described as Lots 1-17, Block 60 and Lots 1st Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. from Medium Density This Area is legally 6-10, Block 31 of the NW Area III (Exhibit C): Redesignate from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. This Area is legally described as Lots 11 and 12, Block 22, Hermosa Beach Tract. NW Area IV: Redesignate from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (Exhibit D-1): This Area is legally described as Lots 1-7, Block 23 and Lots 1-7, Block 24, Hermosa Beach Tract. (Exhibit D-2): This Areas is legally described as Lots 1-7, Block 25 and Lots 1-7, Block 26, Hermosa Beach Tract. (Exhibit D-3): This Area is legally described as Lots 1-11, Block 27, Hermosa Beach Tract. (Exhibit D-4): This Area is legally described as block 1, Shakespeare Beach Tract. (Exhibit D-5): This Area is legally described as Block 1, Shakespeare Beach Tract. Lots 39-46, Lots 12-38, (Exhibit D-6): This Area is legally described as Lots 1-8, Dale Tract and Lots 9-11, Block 1, Shakespeare Beach Tract. NW Area V: Redesignate from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential. (Exhibit E-1): This Area is legally described as Lot 1, Block 110, Shakespeare Tract, and Lots 1-6, Block 66 and Lots 8-13, Block 28, 1st Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. (Exhibit E-2): This Area is legally described as Lots 12-17, block 30, 1st Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. (Exhibit E-3): Lots 12-23, Block 29, 1st Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. (Exhibit E-4): Lots 3-8, 11 and 12, Tract 1031, and Lots 1, 2, 9, and 10, block 65, 1st Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. NW Area VI (Exhibit F): Redesignate from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. This Area is legally described as Lots 1 and 3, Block 113, Shakespeare Tract. NW Area VII (Exhibit G): Redesignate from High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. This Area is legally described as Lots 13, 15, and 16, Block 103 and Lot 14 and Easterly 20.15 feet of Lot 12, Block 104, Shakespeare Tract. NW Area VIII (Exhibit H): Redesignate from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. This Area is legally described as Lots 1-4, Block 118 and Lot 2, Block 117, Shakespeare Tract. NW Area IX: Redesignate from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential. (Exhibit I-1): This Area is legally described as Lots 1 and (Exhibit I-2): This Area is legally described as Lots 1-30, Block 124, Shakespeare Tract. (Exhibit I-3): This Area is legally described as Lots 1-40, Block 116, Shakespeare Tract. 3-40, Block 117, Shakespeare Tract. 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 (Exhibit I-4): This Area is legally described as Lots 1-30, Block 125, Shakespeare Tract. (Exhibit I-5): This Area is legally described as Lots 1-8, 10 and 11, Block 140 and Lots 1-7, Block 139, Shakespeare Tract. NW Area X (Exhibit J): Redesigate from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential. This Area is legally described as Lots 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27 and 29, Block 128 and Lots 1, Easterly 20 feet of Lot 2, Lots 3, 4, and Southerly 87.5 feet of vacated Ingleside Drive Easement, Block 136, Shakepeare Tract. NW Area XI (Exhibit K): Redesignate from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential. This Area is legally described as Lots 1-5, Block 71, P.McNerney's Re -Plat of a portion of Lot 12, Block 71, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract and remaining of Lot 12, Block 71, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of October, 1987. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED 1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 9 r EXHIBIT A 16th ' -f • 30 - 27 31l 30 25 28 30 40.5 2 39./ 15th SLreet i • 0 NORTHWEST AREA I Redesignate from High Density Residential to General Commercial s + •v . -.r r. s a e.+..c .�+.•F .a0: -4 -?:•41 -.1.o.2: - ...•.�:rct�..t-.,n•-...:r�u.:.��.+..., .. > :-.+,�t .y l4ri..1Yr° :�' '-'41a1r'±'.Ewje,10,1117 ; 1n tt..r.`.SON pi 2/ • EXHIBIT B NORTHWEST AREA II 4 Redesignate from Medium Denisty Residential to Low Density Resi- dential 60 • • • 22 No ST . 10 co o 2 EXHIBIT C 0 .r� NORTHWEST AREA III Redesignate from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Com- mercial 4 -City L,;...trs- F 0 v EXHIBIT D NORTHWEST AREA IV: AREA OVERVIEW Redesignate from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential \, • 9Z0't • • EXHIBIT D-1 . 1q .ate I...sr:as NORTHWEST AREA IV Detail Map 0 16 EXHIBIT D-2 717 '11 25TH ST rit, /70 6 0 • a) /21? 0 0 N.) oh G NORTHWEST AREA IV Detail Map 9 ---i 85.48 01 87 o7 co® 88- 65 CO 90. 4 Z 9/.82 o N�® 95.8/ EXHIBIT D-3 (71 4 95 9 6.58 97.7 N 9.9.75 to 0 — /0/.34 • w 0 0 A/.6.5° 55 E. 0 26TH e1 0 0 NORTHWEST AREA IV DETAIL MAP • • • -".2:11 •-•-‘ . • • i••••k _ 4•'• - • "N.,r •‘.4 • 1. • • :SS . - • 7-- .7 .‘: :/••;e • ,r • • • ; ; • 4.77 "'!."•.7.• • c EXHIBIT D-4 NORTHWEST AREA IV Detail Map - • • D z 0 34TH PL. —1 w ,7 ,;0 12 13 7J85., 89 14 53.. 15 7671 4 1.6 17 7955 CD 018 1-a doA 7Z 19 "- 20 21 .5520 4.1 C0 2 2 0 c ' 0/ oLONGFELLOW PL. ci7.55 23 .9,396 ?) 24 X037 ®25 y 4, 0 2 6 ! J1 �G., 9320 22 7 r P �6 94v^/ 13 4 , - n 2 8 (D) .9603 ;I. R 29 () D .9: dd m I) s. (l n PI 0s8s O ‘.., O 31 0 . w /00 ,7 1,� • !J/ e..9 s (... k w l. co • 2� O 33 t" /0309 = O 34 rods, 35' /0592 D o o C33 '0733 • /0575 7 ZA ® 38 o L., #0./5. 30TH •_:.,..PL. lb 90 tk- W t q' EXHIBIT D-5 NORTHWEST AREA IV Detail Map • C EXHIBIT D-6 ms'r•z r"y Cc CAO w o 7 55./9 cc 56. 6 65 CPv 59 57 G O 4, : O c) • 6/.03 cn O lu w w 62.4 9 N u, 64 /9 (1)-- 6 5- 1) 65. 89 65"07 'E. CO O 67.3 CD 68.727 0 70. /3 34 TH PL.o 'Ski/ • ti!y/y /'7 NORTHWEST AREA IV Detail Map TY r'J TY - �c�v ..1,44 ?Ina EXHIBIT E U FIFTHsY: U NORTHWEST AREA V: AREA OVERVIEW Redesignate from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Resi— dential l , 26TH ST. 60 I do 32 8 j 36 ti I/ 35 10 I 60 I 30 281IQ 13 5�9 f• 60 w MANHATTAN 60 • z5I:b c EXHIBIT E-1 26TH co /0009 01 G >> 6 Q to ?6 5 z5 4 % o H6Z"eoz• 3 BLK. /00 .563.5 i .43.65 _ I , Q12 1 e G - 56.35 �3S 1,, Oh AY a 20 U ti; 0 N 0 10 NORTHWEST AREA V Detail Map 10 -u D C 22,127, O CO r- N p. �Qe V • I 92- ~! 973, L,01Y1CL pi' 70 N ' 90.2 Q 90.4 o 90.6 w 0 ® 90. 8 Cl.; 0 0 91 EXHIBIT E-2 '2,8004.F GO NVIIVH NVW NORTHWEST AREA V Detail Map IO D r :v 1,1 54D -30 E a4. 1Z 112 901 o O �t3 ;3 45.75 1 .14-25 aC0 �a EXHIBIT E-3 90 C 14 ® 15 -G 16 -. 17 -29 1a 19- ©20 ®22 . 0- 2.0 ' U 23 90 2 T 60 N` .L1VHN` V NORTHWEST AREA V Detail Map 60 z .-1 D z 60' 25Tx 0 0 m 20 EXHIBIT E-4 NORTHWEST AREA V Detail Map • /0/ : s ; • /OD . . 0) ca Q cno N ti _ ='. ap 0 • .• /00 ' .. tol Oe. w SAA A �P b ,O e ••N v 01 .01 ss, 0 0 m 20 EXHIBIT E-4 NORTHWEST AREA V Detail Map 40 z Z D _140 D z EXHIBIT F 28TH 30 O 30 O t 3 A2T -r1-r NORTHWEST AREA VI Redesignate from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Con mercial 1 N • 33RD STREET 30 30 33RD PL. i2 13 30 15 30 Longfellow 40 z -1• D Z Avenue Z0. I5 12 20.15 PL. 35 14 35 31ST STREW 40 40 ri EXHIBIT G NORTHWEST AREA VII Redesignate from High Density Residential to Neighborhood. Commercial EXHIBIT H 33 RD . St 33RD 30 3o Lc ((ow o AUC . 30 30 8 32 ND NORTHWEST AREA VIII Redesignate from Medium Density _ Residential to Neighborhood Com— mercial Nt111 V 1 EXHIBIT I NORTHWEST AREA IX: AREA OVERVIEW Redesignate from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential LONGFELLOW THIRTY FIRST I 0 THIRTIETH AVE 0 ST � uu HIGHLAND AVE. J 50. LONGFELLOW S0 n 2. EXHIBIT I-1 0MORNINGSIDE 0DR _ 1 a 70 O ®`7 "' • M • N O c*) • eco N Oco N N N ti � N O O 0 a N • p • O \O° 1 TO 35 1135 . ®IcO 3S I 35' 70 70 '0 S 24°53'E TO APNCJI N a M 0 Z N 10 x ® • 01. N • ti 'i 0 C10ON• N • m N a O N 70 . I Ja i V j : G. .544"5.1[. O O ,MANHATTAN AVE. 40 E 40 NORTHWEST AREA IX Detail Map • ....i.a. a list-�nrt'r.:.-� . ... .. C» l y L Y e /T4'n. ifiY i' .v .. :-viC«+.A:a+,-iuw._ w}i� r ..,.... L -w.: Jvi,R"�.�d. a'.S'ai • r •• (7CS¢l F I W j co- Z 3 O 50 4 LONGFELLOW EXHIBIT I-2 _ 1 L INGLESIDE DR. 70 -, tv N 71 a ti� N a . N N N (d r � j.N .. a ti N = CI • ti, N 'N c1. 2 �) to �t c /CO a .. • O N N • • to v)cO r,--0 i- . C, ft., , N .. 70 -, tv N R, N z a ON N a N ' a N N a CI 'N c1. 2 •. a • O N a • to ti1CRNINGSIDE DR. . 11 4,0 U) 1— �D 6 NORTHWEST AREA IX Detail Map EXHIBIT I-3 'do MORNINGSIDE 70 m ° - O a m co • ® CO ' ▪ e. e 0 II M N a CO a N a O N DR. o - 5.2453E /0 70 - n.9 40 7 • O • m CT) a N • C N II • N ' Z in N N (1, • N N a 0 N ' • CO • °j 01 a � en • • O N L (_) • • O_� ,0 3275 1 3725 , — I n � , 2_ »=s C*) • Q r • O O p MANHATTAN AVE. .:0 2 H O • NORTHWEST AREA IX Detail Map EXHIBIT 1-4 11 • 1 L • INGLESIDE _DR. • • l'rl 70 QD N c't ...., , N %......., . a _ . Gsa) CO N . 4 m .e. .. CV .... N • .... --. 0 Q3) N c 1 , . i) Cn . ,,„ .,.... „..... ,...„...,-, , ....c„, 0 . : „.., ,,, cr:,. • ........ . • .. ,3 : cz• • .... • • l'rl 70 QD N c't N a 1\01 • Loctj . 4 m 4 M N • ..... e _ . , .._. . ® = . ®N . .„..... _., '- ,-)- ---70 , MOR-NING SIDE AVE. +O. .10 1- 0 (1) 10 NORTHWEST AREA IX Detail Map 41111:118MOSIONEMOMMEMISIIIIIIIZ • IMMO EXHIBIT I-5 LONGFELLOW --- o 40 _.-- O BRIMMING -632ND 30 ... n 14030 9. / -s C) 0 ® e 1 3 5 . 7" 30 . I• 30 3 QST 30 7451/5 2 �� N 4 LBLK. ,s . 30 ti 6 _0 o3IST ST )PL. I 30 ® 0 13 O 9. / -s Qs 1 3 5 v% °7 .O 30 .. 30 !79I 030TH ST r -- -33 Cs- PL. NORTHWEST AREA IX Detail Map '. vpi,LLEY c • C r 8,/236 26 ./ 675 a 71 L OSS 8751 l NORTHWEST AREA X 1 o 40 EXHIBIT J 1SL kO h chi _ 875 1- c0 /5 - do 1.473 b • =0 N• 40 ® N x O • s Otn 0 MORNINGSIDE DR. I I I • 0 J 0 JO Redesignate from Medium Density _Residential to Low Density Resi dential • 21 0 • (4 3 '"••••Lwmwp....kpts,..:.erZtepv 0 ZO N -95 j. /0( Ala et6 N3 otb 411 • .... EXHIBIT K 0 m (I) H 40 NORTHWEST AREA XI Redesignate from Medium Density Residential to Low DonsityResi— dential 1! athgr ith 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 87-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN MAP FOR THOSE AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS, EXHIBITS A THROUGH K AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 1, 1987 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following Findings: A. The proposed amendments to the General Plan map will further the goal of limiting density in the community; B. Changing the current General Plan designation for the subject areas will result in consistency between the General Plan and zoning; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa—Beach, California does hereby recommend amending the General Plan map to redesignate those areas as shown on the attached maps, Exhibits A through K and approves an Environmental Negative Declaration. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Compton,Rue,Chmn.Sheldon NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm.Peirce CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 87-52 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regu ar meeting of September 1, 1987 i PO n n k She'1don, Chair an Mic . -.1" chu•ach, Secretary 10[6 (t/ Date To save on copying costs, Exhibits A through K attached to the Planning Commission resolution, are for this report attached only to the proposed City Council Resolution. -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 1, 1987 PAGE 7 or GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR THIRD QUARTER, 1987 Chinn. Sheldon stated that a staff report was in order. Mr. Schubach stated that the staff has selected 11 areas which are inconsistent. Mr: Schubach stated that the reason staff down -designated instead of changing the zoning is that the original plan was to lower density. So staff feels these areas should not be up -zoned. Also, Proposition EE, which was put on the ballot in 1981, had recommended that the lower density prevail. He also stated that some of the areas are commercial, and the staff recommends that they stay commercial. And that the general plan be changed from residential to commercial to be consistent with that commercial zoning and consitent with the land use it is actually there. Public Hearing opened by Chinn. Sheldon at 9:00 P.M. (for anyone wanting to speak on the matter on a general basis.) Churn. Sheldon, seeing no persons wanting to speak on a general basis, went on to the next matter but left the Public Hearing open for any discussion on any matter that comes up as he takes the matters one at a time. AREA 1; EXISTING ZONE, C-2; EXISTING GENERAL PLAN, HIGH DENSITY; PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN, Gm or COMMERCIAL -- No response from the audience ;no response from the Commission. AREA 2; EXISTING ZONE, R-1; EXISTING GENERAL PLAN, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL . -- Michael Lawton, 1840 Hermosa Avenue, addressed the Commission and wanted to know if the building in that area will be affected and will it cause certain structures in that area to be nonconforming. f C PLANNING COMMIISSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 1, 1987 PAGE 8 Mr. Schubach stated that this is not correct. Mr. Schubach stated that the zoing is not being changed. The general plan is being changed. AREA 3, EXISTING ZONE, C-1; EXISTING GENAL PLAN, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; PROPOSED G • PLAN, NEIGH)RHOOD COMMERCIAL — No response from the audience. Comm. Compton wanted to know if this area doesn't include a residenital use.permit. Mr. Schubach stated that if there would be a change in the zoning, that it would be changed to residential, if at all. Comm. Compton wanted to know if the purpose of -this matter is to change the general plan designation of is only what is commercial. He thought that what should be done is draw a line at the edge of the commercial that is there now and thengo back and rezone what is now zoned as commercial to residential and leave it in the general plan designation which is medium density. Mr. Schubach stated that C-1 allows residential on the second floor of a commercial structure. Mr. Lough stated that it would not be a good idea to split the property zoning, and be sure to follow property lines. Chmn. Sheldon wanted to make sure that the Committee'understood•the fact' that when•Area'3 is being considered, they know whether or not the area is to be considered'as one area or two. AREA 4; EXISTING ZONE, R-1; EXISTING GENERAL PLAN, PROPOSED G e'. PLAN, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL -- dom. Comm. Compton wanted to know if a particular piece is designated as commercial under the general plan. Mr. Schubach stated that it is. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; No response from the audience. of property in this area AREA 5; EXISTING ZONE, R-1; EXISTING GENERAL PLAN, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL: - PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL — No response from the audience. Comm. Rue wanted to know if there are any multiple -family residences in that area. Mr. Schubach commented that it is difficult not to find some within the city. He :stated that before 1956, there was no zoning ordinance. Therefore, they based the planning on what was already existed there. AREA 6;. EXISTING ZONE, C-1; EXISTING GENERAL PLAN, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL — No response from the audience; no response from the Commission. PLANNING COM"1TSSION MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 1, 1987 AREA 7; EXISTING PROPOSED GENERAL no response from AREA 8; EXISTING PROPOSED GENERAL audience. PAGE 9 ZONE, C-1; EXISTING GENERAL PLAN, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; PLAN, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL — No response from the audience; the Commission. ZONE C-1; EXISTING GENERAL PLAN, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; PLAN, NEIGHBORHOOD COMICIAL — No response from the Comm. Rue wanted to know if there is going to be a problem with having a commercial zone next t� a residential zone. Mr. Schubach stated it will not be a problem. He stated that there are other .retail shops close by. AREA 9; EXISTING ZONE, R-1; EXISTING GENERAL PLAN, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL — No response from the audience. Comm. Rue wanted to make it clear that there will be two lots at the end, . adjacent to Valley Drive, designated aS R-2. Mr. Schubach stated that that is correct. He also stated that the staff would leave the lots as they are -now designated, or they- would' look at them again at a later time. Comm. Compton asked if they were consistent at the present time. Mr. Schubach stated that that is correct. AREA 10; EXISTING ZONE R-1; EXISTING GENERAL PLAN, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL — No response from the audience; no response from the Commission. AREA 11; EXISTING ZONE, R-1; EXISTING GENERAL PLAN, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL -- Michael Michael Lawton, 1840 Hermosa Avenue; addressed the Commission and stated that he is a member of the church located on that piece of land,.and stated that•..if Loma Drive will be extended, it would go right through the building. Chmn. Sheldon pointed out to Mr. Lawton that the lot is vacated. Mr. Schubach stated that there was a street that was dedicated, and it was given back to the property owner. Chmn. Sheldon helped the confusion that Mr. Lawton had about what "vacated" meant and stated that the City has no claim on vacated property. Comm. Compton stated that what essentially they are talking about doing is making half of the church remain R-2 density, and the back, which is now zoned R-1, making it low density. Mr. Schubach agreed. Comm. Compton wondered if that would be an area that should be zoned R-2, altogether, so the entire area is like zoning. -%f f PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 1, 1987 PAGE 10 Mr. Schubach stated that the northerly three lots are zoned R-1, and the two lots to the south are zoned R-1. Churn. Sheldon asked Mr. Schubach:if he knew if the church owned the two lots. Mr. Schubach stated he didn't think so because there is nothing in his report stating that it does. He did -stated, however, that there was ownership indicated on the vacated -Loma. Drive strip. Chinn. Sheldon stated that the big question is regarding whether the church uses the property solely for its own use or for the use as church rentals. Mr. Schubach stated that there is not indication either way. Churn. Sheldon wanted to know if it really matters what zoning a church has. Mr. Schubach stated that it doesn't really make sense and it probably - doesn't matter. Mr. Lawton stated that if things were changed, the altar of the church would be wiped out. Comm. Compton felt that it doesn't make a lot of sense to be zoned R-1 because there are basically classrooms located on it. He stated that, if the building burns down, that under R-1 zoning, one could not rebuild that particular building. Mr. Schubach stated that is the one type of zoning that churches are allowed to do such rebuilding. He feel that there is really no problem with the change in zoning. Public Hearing closed by Churn. Sheldon at 9:28 P.M. MOTION by Comm. Compton, seconded by Comm. Rue to approve the general plan amendments for the third.quarter, 1987, and to approve staff's recommendation. No objections, so ordered. _...:.K:1.;i::..,,�_' .•_ i.u•£! stir..u:;,:u_...,.>.��..:.moi-:aa�!�:.. . .... .....:.:..: 1,�:,r. -�<_� t.,....:�-w.-.,.. _.. :r.'�e'.'. >:� ir: �::�:r 3�.. �•.:�_.�.....:: �v-: Regular Meeting of October 13, 1987. Preliminary Design Report, Gould/Valley/Ardmore Citizen's Rebuttal to staff report, and Counterproposal From: Jim Lissner, 376-2287 To: Hermosa Beach City Council r1 it The staff report on the above entitled matter deinands debunking, and this is it. The Roman Numerals refer to the corresponding numbered sections in the staffzXeport. II, 1, a: In the. middle of page 3, in sub -pa :agraph "a,"' staff says "KHR concludes that reducing the sze of the intersection could have a serious impact on the already critical existing queing problem." In their 1`etter, KHR was actually more certain than a "could have." On\page 4, - bottom, they said "A reduction in the number oftravel lanes on the Westbound Gould Avenue approach to Ardmore'Avenue WILL HAVE (emphasis mine) serious impact on the 'already critical queing problem..." KHR goes on to claiih to have caluculated a potential queue length of 514 cars,\or 1000 feet. MY calculations say that this many cars would take 10,000 feet not 1000. Maybe they left a decimal place out of the cars figure, and it was meant to be 51.4. 'If they actually meant a queue of 1000 feet, I have news for them. We already have one that long, most weekdays. Also see IV, 5, below. II, 1, b: Staff speculates at length that it could have trouble finding a design engineer willing to work on a "substandard" intersection, but so far has queried only their existing consultant about doing it. I suspect that it will be easy to find a firm to do the work, simply by contacting the staff in those nearby cities which'have been progressive in their use of traffic control devices. The use -of "road bumps" is an example. While they are not an approved traffic control device, they are in use, successfully, in numerous California cities, including Santa Monica and Thousand Oaks. Until staff has contacted the Public Works Directors in a few of those cities and come up without a referral, I will have a hard time believing that there will be any difficul\ty finding an engineer. II, 1, c: I would like to see CalTrans' actual wording. And I wonder if staff has looked to see if there is any precedent for keeping the Federal money while still designing smaller - perhaps justified by an increase in safety. (More about this in counterproposal, below.) SUPPLEMEN T AL I NFORMATION II, 4, a: See II, 1, a, above. II, 4, b: Assumes a longer queue, which isonly speculation. The frustrated drivers will simply try a different route to their home in PV, next time. And see III, 2, and IV, 5, below. II, 4, c: Properly selected turn restrictions, namely those which remove turning movements which impede the flow of traffic, will be enforced by those motorists whose interests are served by said restrictions. But if necessary, I would be willing to give up the idea of any turn restrictions, because the resulting left turns would reduce,_ peak traffic volume. III: The lead paragraph (page 5, middle) say'; "Presently: there is... an increasing accident rate." This is untrue. The two "collison diagrams" included in the packet show the following accidents per year. ` :I 1983 4 1984 7 1985 4 1986 2 1987 4 (annualized) If the increase in traffic volume over these years'is figured -in, the accident rate/car has actually decreased :a lot. This seems to argue that a more congested intersection is safer, and, indeed, the KHR report- offers an explanation. On page 3, bottom, they wrote: "Ironically, the extreme congestion... also keeps vehicle speeds to a minimum. Thus most traffic accidents have not involved severe injuries." 1 III, 1: See immediately above. 1 III, 2: Aha! The old "traffic imperative" argument. Well, much of the traffic doesn't need to be here at all. If you missed my last letter... For traffic southbound on Valley at Gould, the survey (Hermosa's 1980 "Traffic Circulation Study") found "51 percent of respondents indicated that they neither live nor work in Hermosa Beach, but they use this route daily." (page 95) For traffic southbound on Ardmore, at Gould, the survey said "47 percent of the respondents\ who travel southbound on Ardmore Avenue daily had an origin and destination outside of the Hermosa Beach city boundaries." (page 98) For traffic westbound on Gould (at Ardmore), the survey said that 39% of these motorists "would prefer to use an operationally improved PCH instead of their present route..." (page 89) (Note that they were westbound on Gould.) KHR analyzed their own figures and agreed that much of this is "non -area commuter traffic." (page 2 of their letter) Staff's concern about intrusion onto other neighborhood streets is unnecessary. Given that their are no other parallel neighborhood streets between Ardmore and PCH, and that the streets west of Ardmore are slower routes which are already highly utilized, the only "neighborhood street" that the traffic is likely to be forced onto is PCH - and that is where much of it belongs anyway. III, 3: Staff argues that the proposed improvements will not increase traffic volume. I don't think a logical person would accept staff's assertion - but just in case... First, the improved road surface will allow quicker acceleration "off the line," and will make higher speeds comfortable due to less jarring. I know I could personally make my left turn towards downtown Hermosa a lot faster if the road was smoother. And that translates into a higher peak capacity for the intersection. Secondly, the proposed improvements also add an important six feet to westbound Gould at Valley. In the present 18 feet we have two lanes of cars, so we can expect that with 24 feet we will have three lanes. Remember, even the islands in alternate 1 are just PAINT. III, 4: Whose side is the author of this paragraph on, anyway? We don't need mathematical sleight-of-hand from city staff. (Such shenanigans are the exlusive province of those of us in private enterprise.) See the paragraph immediately above for the real impact of this "increase of less than 2%." IV: (Staff's) Summary and Conclusions. Staff talked about the consequences of a smaller intersection. 1. Maybe, but Staff hasn't looked for an engineer yet. See II, 1, b, above. 2. No. Accidents would decrease. See III above. 3. City liability need not increase. My analysis of the accidents indicates they are caused by the extreme width and offset of the intersection. Thus my design compressed the intersection as much as possible, and makes the limit -line to limit -line north -south width as equal as possible to the east -west width. Given Hermosa's past experiences with a large accident claim on another of our angled intersections, any plan must include detailed analyses of the causes of past accidents at G/V/A. The present study is incomplete in that respect, and leaves us WIDE OPEN. 4. Unfounded. The wider the intersection is, the harder it is to keep an eye on the crossing traffic, and the harder it is to simultaneously find where your lane continues on the other side, particularly where the interesection is.skewed as this one is: Islands add width and jumble. The least confusing intersection is simple and small - so all the action is in the center of your vision. 5. When the line gets too long, some will go back to PCH. The line will stay the length it is now, whether the intersection capacity is increased or decreased. The only thing that will increase the lines at G/V/A is increased delay on PCH. See also II, 1, a, and III, 2, above. 6. A small intersection will neither increase nor decrease congestion. See 5 above. In any case, increased congestion has translated into a lower accident rate. (III, lead paragraph, above.) 7. Impossible., See III, 2, above. 8. This can be avoided. See V, b, and V, c, below. V. MY COUNTERPROPOSAL V, a: Council has now, twice, directed staff to study a smaller intersection. Staff has sabotaged both efforts. Council should ask staff to adopt a "can -do" attitude and go back for a third try, with the admonishment that if a small intersection isagain found to be impossible, staff should support their conclusion with hard data, not speculation. V, b: Whatever their recommendation, big or small, staff must show, in an accident -by -accident analysis, how the preferred design is the one which would go further to prevent recurrences similar to past accidents - with special attention to the more serious accidents. V,•c: I think that CalTrans would have to approve the money for a provably safer intersection - even if it is smaller. VI. MY "OTHER ALTERNATIVES" a. Drop it if the FAUH funds expire or can't be used except for a higher volume intersection. We don't want even the present size re -paved. It must be smaller. c. Please don't postpone this item until the city revises its circulation element. We're still waiting for the two left turns at Artesia/PCH, and the 30 mph speed limits, that were provided in the old circulation element. Redesigning G/V/A won't be easy, but the project doesn't deserve to be put in outer limbo on a politically impossible wish list such as our circulation elements have been. Gould/Valley/Ardmore should be made smaller. It's politically popular, and we have the money. October 2, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 13, 1987 PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT, HIGHLAND AVENUE WIDENING (CIP 85-102) AND GOULD/VALLEY/ARDMORE INTERSECTIONS IMPROVEMENTS (CIP 85-137) Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Accept the preliminary design report (Exhibit A). 2. Authorize completion of the plans and specifications for Highland Avenue. 3. Authorize completion of the plans and specifiations using Figure #9 (Alternative No. 1) for Valley/Gould/Ardmore. Background: With reference to the Gould/Valley/Ardmore intersection design, at the September 8, 1987 City Council meeting, Council advised staff to: 1. Request that the consultant include a plan to design the intersection to discourage traffic (i.e., plan to minimize intersection). 2. ....amended to include further reaction from designer to concept of further reducing size of intersection, also to get accident reports for past 2 - 3 years and previous traffic counts for area. 3. -Request that the consultant address drainage and pedestrian safety in the report. 4. Request. that the consultant look at Mr. Lissner's design and comment on alternatives. 5. Bring back this item as a municipal matter on September 22, 1987, -if possible. At the September 22, 1987, City Council meeting, Council agreed to postpone this matter for discussion at the October 13, 1987 Council meeting. Analysis: Staff has prepared the requested information. This report will concentrate primarily upon Valley/Gould/Ardmore intersection and has been divided into six sections as follows: I. Historical Background 1 II. City Council Concerns 1. Design to discourage traffic by reducing size of intersection. 2. Accident Reports & Traffic Counts 3. Drainage and Pedestrian Safety Concerns 4. Investigate Mr. Lissner's design III. Additional Staff Concerns IV. Summary and Conclusions V. Recommendations VI. Alternatives I. Historical Background a. Highland Avenue Highland Avenue in Manhattan Beach, immediately north of the Hermosa/Manhattan boundary is 40 feet wide. The concept of widening Highland Avenue in Hermosa Beach originated several years ago when an accident history study indicated a number of side -swipe type accidents on Highland Avenue from Longfellow to 35th Street. By widening Highland Avenue in Hermosa Beach to match the width of Highland in Manhattan Beach, it will reduce the number of accidents. After obtaining Federal and State approval and commitment to financial support of the project, City Council approved the widening of Highland Avenue in the FY 86-87 Capital —Improvement Budget. b. Valley/Gould/Ardmore City records indicate that street improvements at the Valley/Gould/Ardmore intersection have been considered by City Councils since August 1949 when drainage problems were discussed, but no action was taken until a catch basin was installed in 1956. Minor (temporary) improvements were made in 1960 and again in 1969. In May, 1975, residents of Gould Avenue were polled regarding their ideas. Engineering design services for the subject improvements were contracted out to Lampman & Associates, and in August, 1975, $70,000 was approved by L.A. County for these improvements. In May, 1976, a consulting engineering firm was contracted by the City to do the engineering calculations and surveying. Finally in June, 1977, an asphalt overlay was paved on Gould Avenue from El Oeste to Ardmore at a cost of $17,109. No design changes were made at that time. 2 r In May, 1981, a Citizens Ad Hoc Committee was established to represent citizens in traffic related projects within the City. Shortly thereafter, the "27th Street Environmental Protective Association" was established, and in June, 1984, concurred with staff's recommendation to Council to "authorize the Public Works Department to proceed with the installation of traffic channelization islands...to upgrade the intersection of Gould/Valley/Ardmore". In late 1984, Council authorized staff to proceed with an FAU grant application for this project, which was approved in 1986 and became a part of our FY 86-87 CIP budget. II. City Council Concerns In an effort to address City Council concerns, our project consultant, Barrett Consulting Group (BCG) required special expertise and sub -consulted the traffic engineering firm of KHR Associates. The results of KHR's analysis are attached to Exhibit A as an addendum to BCG's Preliminary Design Report. Responses to Council's concerns are summarized below: 1. Investigate design to discourage traffic by reducing size of intersection It is the opinion of KHR that traffic will continue with or without improvements. In fact, -the concept of re -designing the intersection to reduce its size could result in the following consequences: a. KHR concludes that reducing the size of the intersection could have a serious impact on the already critical existing queing problem. It could result in a more congested, less safe, and more confusing intersection. b. The department is concerned with the potential difficulty in engaging the services of a qualified design engineer willing to design a smaller intersection, since an engineer is liable for his design. BCG expressed that they would decline such a request to design a substandard intersection. The City would then be required to send out Request for Proposals for these design services, and may not receive any responses. c. Caltrans has indicated that a project designed to reduce traffic flow is ineligible for FAU funds. Since the Valley, Gould, Ardmore improvement construction is to be FAU funded, the City could be forced to forfeit approximately $191,000 in FAU funds. 2. Accident Reports & Traffic Counts A. Accident Reports a. Gould/Valley/Ardmore: The collision diagrams illustrating the accident reports are included in Exhibit 3 A. In summary, there have been 7 accidents at the Valley/Gould intersection since 1983, and 13 at the Ardmore/Gould intersection. b. Highland Avenue: There have been 3 side -swipe type accidents on Highland Avenue since 1983. To avoid being hit drivers are parking their cars on the sidewalk area. B. Traffic Counts a. Gould/Valley/Ardmore: Traffic counts are included in Exhibit A. Below is a summary of 1980 and 1987 traffic counts at this intersection: Gould Avenue E/0 Valley/Ardmore 27th Street W/0 Valley/Ardmore Ardmore Avenue S/0 Gould Avenue Ardmore Avenue N/0 Gould Avenue Weekday -Daily Average Volumes August 1980 11,150 5,500 4,200 4,700 Valley Drive 7,850 S/0 Gould Avenue Valley Drive 7,200 N/0 Gould Avenue % of Increase July 1987 or Decrease 12,900 8,400 7,280 8,550 6,400 9,100 16% Increase 53% Increase 73% Increase 82% Increase 18% Decrease 26% Increase Even without improvements, traffic at the Valley/Gould/Ardmore intersection has increased by up to 82%. b. Highland Avenue: Below is a summary of the 1980 and 1986 traffic counts on Highland Avenue in Hermosa Beach (1987 counts are not available). August 1980 3,500 March 1986 4,308 % of Increase 19% Increase Even without improvements, traffic on Highland Avenue has increased 19% between August 1980 and March 1986. 3. Drainage and Pedestrian Safety The preliminary design report (Exhibit A) has been revised to address drainage and pedestrian safety which will be included in the final design. - 4 - 4. Investigate Mr. Lissner's design Mr. Lissner's design is based on a reduction in the number of approach lanes, restrictions on various turn movements and minimum traffic engineering standards. Although the intent is apparently to discourage traffic from using the subject intersections, the following potential consequences are concluded by KHR and should be considered by Council: a. Serious impact on queing problem, i.e., a longer line and wait to get through the intersection. b. The potential effect of leaving motorists frustrated and angry; possibly in a willing _state to make illegal and/or dangerous actions. c. Difficulty gaining public acceptance of (selected hours) turn movement restrictions without added police enforcement. III. Additional Staff Concerns The redesign of the Valley/Gould/Ardmore intersection has been considered by Hermosa Beach City Councils dating back over thirty years. Presently there is a heavily congested intersection, operating over capacity, with an increasing accident rate, largely due to driver confusion. Staff empathizes with the concerns addressed at the September 8, 1987 City Council meeting, including the following: 1. Safety & sight distance: It is the City's responsibilty to provide the public with safe streets. Safety is directly related to liability, which City Council has been striving to reduce. Staff is concerned that by reducing the size of `the intersection, the accident rate would increase, as would the City's potential liability. 2. Increased traffic on residential streets: If the Gould/Valley/Ardmore intersection were made less desirable (via a smaller design or total elimination) motorists who would otherwise use this intersection might be forced to utilize an alternate route, i.e., neighborhood intrusion. The effect would be increased traffic on someone else's street. 3. Concern regarding the assumption that proposed intersection improvements will increase traffic volume. The fact is, the rate of traffic through the Valley/Gould/Ardmore intersection will not increase as a result of the proposed improvements because Valley/Gould/Ardmore is a stop controlled intersection. Vehicles will still be required to stop at the intersection. The design will not make cars move faster down the hill or faster through the intersection. The improvements are designed to increase 5 the safety and sight distance. On the other hand, Mr. Lissner's design would result in vehicles taking more time to go through the intersection, due to a longer queing period. 4. Concern regardingthe assumption that a "larger" intersection will result in increased traffic. The proposed intersection improvements will increase the size of the intersection by 200 square feet. The existing intersection is approximately 12,000 square feet. This represents an area increase of less than 27. Or worded another way, there is 90 feet between Ardmore and Valley; hence, the intersection will be widened approximately one foot on each side. IV. Summary and Conclusions A design (either Mr. Lissner's or an outside consultant's) to make the Gould/Valley/Ardmore intersection smaller, could result in the following consequences: 1. Difficulty contracting a qualified engineer willing to design the intersection 2. Increased accident rate 3. Increased City liability 4. Increased driver confusion 5. Increased queing problem 6. Increased intersection congestion 7. Increased traffic on residential streets 8. Loss of approximately $200,000 FAU funds On the other hand, the improvements suggested in BCG's Alternative No. 1 should have the following consequences: 1. Decreased accident rate 2. Improved sight distance 3. —Decreased City liability 4. Decreased driver confusion 5. Decreased intersection congestion V. Recommendation It is recommended that City Council proceed with design Figure 9 (Alternative #1) . VI. Alternatives: 1. Rather than trying to discourage traffic by means of a substandard intersection design, perhaps the concept of completely discouraging this traffic by eliminating the intersection (except for U-turn purposes) should be considered. This alternative is illustrated in Exhibit B (Staff Alternate #1). This alternative would require a Focused Traffic Study since residents of nearby streets will have increased traffic placed on their street. This 6 study could require a one year public hearing/review process and could cost up to $25,000. 2. Other alternatives considered by staff and available to Council are: a. Drop the project. b. Modify the preliminary design report. c. Postpone this item until the City revises its circulation element. Respectfull submitted, eborah M. Murphy Assistant Engineer C.,H ur: Gayle • Martin Interim City Manager DMM:mv predes/v Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Concur: Anthony Antich Director of'Public Works - Preliminary Design Report - Staff Alternative No. 1 7 EXHIBIT A CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT HIGHLAND AVENUE GOULD-VALLEY-ARDMORE INTERSECTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT Part 1. HIGHLAND AVENUE A. Existing Conditions Highland Avenue is a residential street thirty feet wide with curbs, a five foot wide park strip and a five foot wide sidewalk. The right-of-way from Longfellow Street to Thirty - Third Street is 50 feet wide and from Thirty -Third Street to Thirty-fifth Street it is 60 feet wide. The project limits shown on Figure 1 are from the Hermosa Beach -Manhattan Beach City Boundary on Thirty-fifth Street to Longfellow Street. The purpose of this project is to widen Highland to provide two traffic lanes and two parking lanes in each direction. B. Proposed Improvements The proposed improvements include widening Highland Avenue to 40 feet by removing the existing curbs, park strips and sidewalks and installing new curb and gutter five feet from the existing curbs, paving the roadway and installing new sidewalks. Typical sections of the proposed improvements are shown on Figure 2. In order to accomplish the widening -project it will be necessary to relocate utilities within the right-of-way. These include water meters, power/telephone poles, gas meters, cable television junction boxes and sanitary sewer facilities. Preliminary contact with all affected utilities has been made and preliminary design documents will be sent to them for review and comment. It will be necessary for the various utilities to relocate their respective facilities to accommodate the proposed improvements. The only exception to this is the sanitary sewer along Highland. This sewer relocation will be designed as a part of the street widening. It is proposed to relocate the sewer from the east curb line to the center of the roadway. The proposed relocation is shown on Figure 3. Existing drainage patterns will be maintained. There are no existing catch basins or inlets on Highland Avenue and none are proposed for this project.' Street lighting will 'be maintained ori relocated Marbolite Type 56D6 power poles. The roadway surface will be constructed of asphalt concrete pavement, minimum two inches thick. Pavement will be placed over existing pavement and/or six inches of aggregate base. Curbs will be six inches high with an integral 24 inch gutter. New sidewalks will be portland cement concrete, four inches thick. (74000-PDR/Misc. 9 -1- (Revised) 10/1/87 PART 2. GOULD - VALLEY - ARDMORE INTERSECTION A. Existing Conditions Valley Drive and Ardmore Avenue are parallel streets separated by a 100 foot median that originally was a railroad right-of-way. The two roadways, Ardmore Avenue and Valley Drive 30 and 40 feet wide, respectively, and provide two lane, two way traffic. Gould Avenue also is a two lane, two way street and the intersection of Gould with Valley and Ardmore results in two-four way stop intersections within one hundred feet of each other. At each of the four-way stops, all possible turning movements are permitted. This results in confusion as to which vehicle has the right-of-way and in delays, particularly for vehicles making right turns. The purpose of this project is to provide channelization at each four-way stop to help eliminate driver confusion thereby creating a safer intersection and reducing delays for all vehicles. B. Proposed Improvements Two alternatives have been developed to enhance the safety of this intersection. The first alternative essentially maintains the status quo as far as turning movements. It provides channelization for right turns for northbound traffic on Valley and Ardmore, a left turn lane from Westbound Gould onto Valley and for right turns from southbound Ardmore onto Gould. The second alternative provides the same right -turn channelization as above and, in addition, restricts Gould, between Valley and Ardmore to through and right turns only. The first alternative would require approximately 200 square feet of additional pavement on Gould between Valley and Ardmore. The new pavement would be required between the existing and new curb as shown on Figure 5. The second alternative can be constructed between existing curbs. A third alternative, not designed or sketched due to the magnitude of its impacts, is to convert Valley to one-way traffic southbound and to convert Ardmore to one-way traffic northbound. This would reduce the number of potential turning movements from 24 to 16, thus eliminating confusion and delay. Whichever alternative is selected, the final design will incorporate pedestrian safety and drainage improvements in addition to the channelization. (74000-PDR/Misc. 9) -2- (Revised) 10/1/87 C. Traffic Engineer's Report Attached to this Preliminary Design Report as Addendum Number 1 is a report from KHR Associates that analyzes existing condi- tions, accident history and improvement alternatives. This Addendum was prepared in response to action taken by the City Council requesting a design to discourge traffic at this intersection. D. Supporting Data The raw data, including traffic counts and accident reports are included as an attachment to this report. (74000-PDR/Misc. 9) -3- (Revised) 10/1/87 ytwolATTAN fl " sTArt • I .PROJECT I • -" SITE. I 5T 3., - Z.. REM• t'7 ,. Min ST VCORNEES C'soEF3r. t; 5r • • A, F RTESIA_ 0 10 20 40 il .._i 3 o _1 iw ! u_ 0 ; ; Z L.-- — ------1 [---------------±'1— S ... 1 - • —.----.7i-- -..----• J ' ' - "--•'-:.--J-- -. --- :... ' - As...16r AVENUE 1 1 ..,...,. -• c- --, ->1 I .! 1 I 1 i 111 1 BARRETT CONSULTVIG GROW INC CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HIGHLAND AVENUE SITE AND PROJECT FIGURE -I KOw. S.0 R.O.W. rc Bw FC BW LEGEND CENTER LINE R.O.W. EXISTING GRADE OVERLAY FACE OF CURB BLV Cf WALK 20.0' w _.__ I&J' T1PC WO. rSTA TALC ex2,0I AORD C[VL FC REw A{. 2' 0' • IR 0' I•.T. CC{. QS O -\:. FLIP,. &C. _L__ TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION 501 R.O.W. 2^ TT C !C CUIm PE sr Z rLCR 2a-01-Oj L'WRTT LOCO DEFT. 20.^ T CMS% CORO FC S 0' R.O.W. Brt 5,^ JI [w Easr. tuna TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION 60' R.C.Vv. Ca6T. COh0 BARRETT CONSULTING GROUP INC. 2w.I....,L..... C... uo..o.,.l. n.O..Cstr T.r..e Clam CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH IIIGFILAI.0 AVENUE TYPICAL SECTIONS PROJECT RUMMER op FIGURE - 2 LEGEND STREET CENTER LWEI RIGHT OF WAY FACE OF CURB EDGE GE CONC. rxu s M BaloT PA0150 RWTa PL PUNTER 0P• ELECTRC POWER POL ' OWATER METER ; a STREET TREE I Q Sal' SEWER MAN ROLE - �- SEWER MAIN - �- GAS MAIN - -=ATER=API j • T�__� HIGHLAND 0 10 20 SCALE XiCa�uuuAu x T � I� it aII I,I di I I 4 J AVENUE i '•i P 2. tAMC 1lll ! I' Ft inimmuninimadmiiimmnimumni umm 5 o i CITY OF HERMOSA BEAbH HIGHLAND AVENUE PLAN AND PROFILE EXISTING SEWER FIGURE -3 •-• '•••• ••• -••••• • • — —...------.— '3, - _ +Ur- - , •▪ •••••„,( MSS • ) • cc 'NIS LW v. COSMO V, STEMS P.OTC•SuaLtnaiC IJCP.OSS LINALY/ICAL 1.01,41•01, 0... YO Ds1/Iel LE•14....01rate.4..ae 11.1-49117 at° IPS, ICS wilt• .4110.1. Sla.POWIDS. I•UPI .1:1[ CAWS, IS 0111,•WID Br POLILLI DICATEK. INC. ; -• .4.,5••••••••••r\ 2- 3 -,„`„ •••• i„ .`•. • t • • • • • • s • , c I a tcc o•-za• c .• 91: BARnr CONSULTING GROUP INC. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GOULD INTERSECTION IF XISTING) ..•••:: I FIGURE4 1 New Curb 'Existing Curb 1.1S us. •SS Ca.siLLS ay eirt.20 S elo .11,1E4 111S/SASS, ssc S.ssSi P.S.1.4ss.r GIS 1- s- „Lk, C}0.1SS • .1. mai OW ▪ SIss..1,,S. SSW, s -1111I Ste,. IS WSW,. IP IOs FACE DICATEK, INC. BARRETT CONSITING GROUP INC. mos n..s..sys. Iwo CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • GOULD INTERSECTION ALTERNATE NO.1 74001 FIGURE 5 - — A01., aT{ 1-1-1.P, CP,. 4ilLL. g.:E•T !, 003,4ED 5. D I CATEK INC. BARRETT CONSULTING GROUP INC. sm. ma vinas CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GOULD INT.ERSECTION ALTERNATIVE NO. 2 '"'''''' 071". IFIGURE 6 °' APPENDIX �r.,Y3ar KM ASSCIC1ATES TRANSPORTATION /ENVIRCNIVIENTAL/ URBAN 3VSTSb1S PLANNING & ENGINEERING September 10, 1987 Mr. William Simons Barrett Consulting Group, Inc. 3184-K Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92626 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC ENGINEERS REPORT FOR GOULD AVENUE/ARDMORE AVE- NUE/ VALLEY DRIVE, IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Dear Mr. Simons: Transmitted herein are the results of a traffic engineering ana- lysis by KHR Associates of potential traffic flow/traffic safety improvements to the adjacent intersections of Gould Avenue/Ard- more Avenue and Gould Avenue/Valley Drive, in the City of Hermosa Beach. This analysis was based on traffic count and traffic accident data provided by the City, and an independent field review of the site during the late afternoon peak period of traffic demand. BACKGROUND Gould Avenue/Ardmore Avenue and Gould Avenue/Valley Drive pre- sently operate as a complex combination of 4 -way stop intersec- tions. The two highly -skewed intersections are within 160 feet of each other, and are heavily congested throughout much of the day. Figure 1 illustrates the geometric and traffic lane con- figurationsof the subject intersections. Although the subject intersections are located within a pri- marily residential area, Gould Avenue, Ardmore Avenue, and Valley Drive all carry disproportionate volumes of traffic. Gould Avenue forms the westerly terminus of Artesia Boulevard (State Route 91), while Ardmore Avenue,and Valley Drive parallel, and are in close proximity to, Pacific Coast Highway/ Sepulveda Boulevard (State Route 1). Thus, a significant amount of commuter traffic uses the subject intersections during the weekday. In addition, the accessibility of beach areas from these streets results in a significant amount of recreational traffic on weekends. Figure 2 illustrates recent directional average daily traffic volumes on the subject streets. Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the turn movement volumes during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, respectively. 2201 I`,1ARTIti STREET / suI-E 203 ! IRVINE. CAL:FCRIVIA 92715 p.1.41752-1707 Mr. William Simons September 10, 1987 Page Two ANALYSIS OF EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW On July 10th and llth, 1987, directional traffic counts were tabulated at the subject intersections every 15 -minutes, during a 48-hour period of time. In addition, on July 9, 1987, turn movement counts were taken during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours at the subject intersections. The traffic count data collected during this time reveal a great deal about traffic flow, and the interaction of traffic between the two intersections. These data indicate that the volume of traffic on Gould Avenue east of Ardmore Avenue averaged 12,820 vehicle per day, while the volume of traffic on Gould Avenue west of Valley Drive averaged 8,753 vehicle per day. The signi- ficant difference between traffic volumes on Gould Avenue east of Ardmore Avenue and west of Valley Drive is accounted for by the heavy turn movements at the subject intersections. Over 4,000 vehicles per day are diverted from Gould Avenue onto either Ardmore Avenue or Valley Drive. Some of this traffic is generated by the local area. Most, however, is suspected to be generated as a result of non -area commuter traffic. It is noted that Ardmore Avenue and Valley Drive carry approximately the same volume of traffic over a 24-hour period. Over a 24-hour period of time, the volume of traffic on Gould Avenue in the eastbound direction is similar to the volume of traffic in the westbound direction (i.e., east of Ardmore Ave- nue, 6,348 average eastbound versus 6,473 average westbound; west of Valley Drive, 4,088 average eastbound versus 4,666 average westbound). However, westbound traffic is consistently slightly higher than eastbound traffic. A 50/50 split in traffic over a 24-hour period of time is to be expected for a residen- tial street. For Ardmore Avenue, the average 7,163 vehicles per day is split 67/33 (or two-thirds/one-third) in favor of the northbound direction. This indicates that Ardmore Avenue is heavily utilized for directional commuting by non -area traffic. Peak hour turn movement counts also support this indication, as west- bound right -turns from Gould Avenue to Ardmore Avenue are excep- tionally high in comparison to other movements for both A.M. and P.M. peak hours. In addition, the northbound through movement is the predominant movement through the intersection during the A.M. peak hour. For Valley Drive, the average 8,182 vehicles per day is split 70/30 in favor of the southbound direction. This indicates that Valley Drive is also heavily utilized for directional commuting by non -area traffic. A contradiction to the overall split of traffic throughout the day occurs during the A.M. peak hour, when the northbound through movement on Valley Drive is predomi- nant. Mr. William Simons September 10, 1987 Page Three It is of interest to note that the capacity of a 4 -way stop con- trolled intersection, assuming a 50/50 split of entering traf- fic, is 1,200 vehicles per hour. During the P.M. peak hour, the intersection of Gould Avenue/Ardmore Avenue services 1,760 vehicles per hour (or 560 vehicles per hour over capacity). During the A.M. peak hour, the intersection of Gould Avenue/Val- ley Drive services 2,388 vehicles per hour (or 1,188 vehicles per hour over capacity). A review of the 15 -minute breakdown of traffic volumes through- out the day indicates that the peak hour of vehicular demand is not clearly defined. Thus, it can be concluded that traffic is heavy throughout most of the day. The distributions of 24-hour traffic volumes for Gould Avenue, east Ardmore Avenue; Gould Avenue, west of Ardmore Avenue; Ardmore Avenue north of Gould Avenue; and Valley Drive north of Gould Avenue are depicted in Figure 5, 6, 7, and 8 respectively. ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS The recent history of traffic accidents at the subject intersec- tions was reviewed from the annual Statewide Integrated Traffic -- Records System (SWITRS) reports and accident collision diagrams provided by the City of Hermosa Beach. The Gould Avenue/Ardmore Avenue intersection has suffered from a greater number of accidents over the past several years than the Gould Avenue/Valley Drive intersection (nearly twice as many total accidents during the years 1983 through the first part of 1987) . Mot of the accidents at the Gould Avenue/Ardmore Avenue inter- section have involved driver inattentiveness and right of way violations. The resulting common types of accidents have been rear -end, right-angle, and turn movement collisions. In addi- tion, an usually high number of accidents have involved vehicles being driven off the roadway and hitting fixed objects (inclu- ding parked cars). The intersection geometrics, 4 -way stop traffic controls, heavy traffic volumes, and numerous turn movements create conditions which are conducive to traffic accidents. Ironically, the extreme congestion at the subject intersections also keep vehicle speeds to a minimum. Thus, most traffic accidents have not involved severe injuries. In addition, traffic accidents have occurred in approximately equal numbers during daylight and nighttime hours. Thus, nighttime visibility does not appear to be a problem. Mr. William Simons September 10, 1987 Page Four IMPROVEMENT ALTERNATIVES The subject intersections are in need of traffic flow and traf- fic safety improvements. However, the effect of any improvements to the subject intersections is perceived by the community as conducive to more traffic than already exists. This perception is not without foundation. However, increases in traffic at the subject intersections will continue with or without improve- ments. This traffic, whether generated by development within the City, or by adjacent communities, cannot be controlled through deliberate impedances, such as has have suggested for the subject intersections by a local resident. Alternatives 1 and 2 The Barrett Consulting Group has identified two alternative improvements for the subject intersections - Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 (Figures 9 and 10). The alternatives are similar with respect to improving traffic flow and traffic safety, and share the concept of increasing separation between opposing traffic lanes, and restricting left -turn movements. Alternative 1 is less restrictive and provides -Tor improved traffic flow at the Gould Avenue/Valley Drive intersection. Citizen's Concept An intersection re -design concept based on a reduction in the number of approach lanes, restrictions on various turn move- ments, and "minimum" traffic engineering standards has been pro- posed by a citizen of the community. This concept is illustrated in Figure 6. While the intent of the proposed re -design is clearly to discourage traffic from using the subject intersec- tions, the resulting consequences may not be fully appreciated. It must be kept in mind that the subject intersections already suffer from extremely poor levels of service. Yet, this fact has not discouraged drivers from using the routes accessed via the subject intersections. Residents o.f. the .area have ,.little or no choice in using the subject intersections, and most non -local commuters may continue their set driving patterns despite a significant increase in delay. A reduction in the number of travel lanes on the westbound Gould Avenue approach to Ardmore Avenue will have serious impact on the already critical queueing problem that exists during the peak hours. It is calculated that, if no diversion of traffic occurs (i.e., traffic on Gould Avenue prior to the subject improvements, continues the established pattern of use), west- bound queue lengths of 514 vehicles could result during the P.M. peak hour. This queue length is equivalent to over 1,000 feet Mr. William Simons September 10, 1987 Page Five of back-up, or within 500 feet of Pacific Coast Highway. A "grid -lock" effect could result, leaving motorists not only frustrated and angry, but possibly in a willing state to make illegal and/or dangerous moves should opportunities present themselves. Selected turn movement restrictions have some merit, with res- pect to discouraging non -local commuters. However, turn -movement restrictions which are to be enforced only during selected hours of the day, are inherently difficult to gain public acceptance. Without visible presence of law enforcement, the violation rate, and consequently, accident rate, may be high. To intentionally degrade the engineering design standards of an existing intersection or roadway section is not recommended. Traffic accident data indicate that keeping vehicles on the paved section of the roadway is an existing problem at the subject intersections. Any lessening of lanes widths or turning radii will only exacerbate the accident problem. One -Way Couplet The formation of an one-way couplet using Ardmore Avenue and its opposing parallel, Valley Drive, is not new. In fact, several years ago, Ardmore Avenue and Valley Drive were one way streets, northbound and southbound, respectively. The conversion of Ardmore Avenue and Valley Drive to an one-way couplet may ultimately resolve a number of traffic flow and traffic safety problems .at the subject intersections. However, the concept must be further studied and refined, with adequate provisions for motorists to make connecting U-turns along Ardmore Avenue and Valley Drive. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS The traffic flow analysis herein presented strongly indicate the need for improvements. However, a community concern over ever- increasing traffic at the subject intersections appears equally valid. Traffic accident data indicate the need for safety improvements to the subject intersections. Specifically, additional delineation of roadway edges of pavement will lessen the chances of vehicles running off the road. Either of the two improvement alternatives recommended by Barrett Consulting Group will benefit the subject intersections and improve traffic flow and safety. Alternative 1 is considered the most effective with respect to improving traffic flow and traffic safety. Mr. William Simons September 10, 1987 Page Six For the residential area as a whole, it is recommended that the traffic congestion and accident problems at the Gould Avenue/ Ardmore Avenue and Gould Avenue/Valley Drive intersections, be addressed from the perspective of making principal commuter routes (such as Pacific Coast Highway) more attractive. Such issues are beyond the present analysis, but should be vigorously pursued. It should be noted that the cooperation of Caltrans is essential in resolving the traffic problems that plague the City of Hermosa Beach and the entire South Bay area. IN CLOSING It has been a pleasure working with you on the subject project. It is hoped that the information provided in this report will be of use to you in the design of much needed improvements to the subject intersections. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely yours, KHR Associates lA_ James H. Kawamura, P.E. President FIGURE 1. GEOMETRIC CONFIGUATION ® wry R ® KHIR Q550001 ' 2201 MARTIN STREET SUITE 203 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92715 (714) 752-1707 FIGURE 2. EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME ifill ®him.- Min A53000QFE3 2201 MARTIN STREET SUITE 203 IRVINE, CAUFORNIA 92715 (714) 752-1707 cp FIGURE 3. EXISTING .AM PEAK TURN MOVEMENTS b.._ ISM lab.- KFIR aasocommo 2201 MARTIN STREET SUITE 203 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92715 (714) 752-1707 FIGURE 4. EXISTING P.M. PEAK TURN MOVEMENTS 1111." MOE IBM ®® KEH1E n25000ATIE 2201 MARTIN STREET SUITE 203 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92715 (714) 752-1707 b • 1 T FIGURE 5 1,I -• I I I T I RUTI L,J •-- • h •--• hs • _ ni I• ILD "JE 1\-.-11.JE E"T IF LAFLIHI !FE .'L -E-11 IF - 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •II••••— 1.-.71 ••=1- OD Cr) 1721 %.1 I--- BD Aryl 1- I E F D AY Fr1 EASTBO U D ESTR 0 L.t N D FIGURE 6 DT em I I f"....11 D F? I Pi I .1 T 1-11\-.1 G L D AVE N 1_1 E '0/ 17---11- 0 F- VA L L F.T••• DRIVE 400 EASTBO D ,:f_ oc 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T- 1 1 1 1 1 1 c\I LO 03 1.7) TI."-•••• E%.1 r•-•1 tr-.1 "ni" En •J) I:D. ANA T 1 NF.i E t_J F D F' WE -.TB 0U D 400 -7,00 , 1 00 Figure 7 lc IIINT DI TPIRL III T ARDMORE .1 -';'VE N LI E NORTH 1:1) F 1--; 0 L D AVE r..] I E ..-- -az: -1,----k•. Az 1 • . . ... , 4,- -..„ .....- 1 i , , . 1 . . , ., ....- JA , .,, 1, ..,. / 1 1 I al --a 11111111111111111 .•.FJ1 •=1-- lf-J ID • a 0:1 11 17\1 -- E.J N 'al- —J r_c• TI E OF 11D.A.,)" P CO •C5'.. • NORTHBOUND !-_:;C:IUTH BOUND 5.:=10 400 FIGURE 8 1 1 I IINT DI LLEY DR! E NORT I-1 0 F [ _ y IA E 200 00 171 --8 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 tr-.1 1-- 133 CT) M 17:3 CNI Ni "71- r.0 r-- CO •::=7:, TI MF OF D P RTH Ei 0 LI C:1 UTH U r -A D Figure 9 Barrett Consulting Group Alternative 1 NEW STRIPING -01 4e' 20 • 1.4P--441 : • Ty..EIAL ISLAND STRIPING o-••••• — ' o/ s • s • rty' sN1( ss. • • • • • •%3 • • •410 44.• TyP!CAL EXisriNG..••• '• 1.1:=-- ._— STR;P;NG .. • ••• TYPICAL PROPERTY LINE •---1 o flo - - - Figure 10 Barrett Consulting Group Alternative 2 ••• ocv . %S. • s 0 • .• x • • • ....----• -•••• fp' en WHITE PAINTED LIMIT LINES • • ss, 4V NJ • Figure 11 Barrett Consulting Group Citizen's Concept no right turn ,present .> A0 `• outline • • -- i 'present outline no left turn • .`ler t NAri present outline abandon e • right turn lane present outline= -1,:. 1. all lanes minimum legal width 2. only one lane in each direction -,no left turn pockets 3. eliminate some turn options all turns minimum legal radius perhaps, for right turns, less nhown above than Traffic Counts and Accident Reports i i 1 1 1 1 1 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 15 MINUTE COUNTS STREET:ARDMORE AVE LOCATION:N/0 GOULD AVE DATE 07-10-87 NORTH BOUND AM SOUTH BOUND PM TOTAL TIME NORTH SOUTH TOTAL BOUND BOUND 11 11 22 12:00 76 42 118 16 11 27 94 27 121 6 8 14 84 26 110 8 2 10 81 32 113 4 1 5 1:00 73 27 100 4 3 7 97 29 126 4 3 7 73 22 95 5 2 7 84 26 110 2 6 8 2:00 76 28 104 4 2 6 79 45 124 5 3 8 72 36 108 1 0 1 78 38 116 0 1 1 3:00 83 63 146 0 1 1 99 64 163 0 1 1 91 69 160 1 0 1 89 87 176 1 1 2 4:0`0 95 75 170 2 4 6 107 119 226 2 1 3 100 110 210 1 2 3 93 76 169 4 0 4 5:00 92 112 204 2 3 5 113 137 253 15 1 16 96 133 229 20 6 26 79 136 215 32 2 34 6:00 88 102 190 46_ 6 52 76 74 150 70 7 77 91 67 158 103 14 117 88 71 159 103 16 119 7:00 73 54 127. 156 28 184 82 51 . 133 150 21 171 62 39 101' 154 34 188 69 27 96 144 27 171 8:00 75 29 104 112 21 133 73 28 101 110 19 129 63 25 88 94 41 135 59 20 79 74 20 94 9:00 56 25 81 59 26 85 51 16 67 45 23 68 45 20 65 69 23 92 36 10 4b 60 27 87 10:00 40 19 59 62 '18 80 42 12 54 65 20 85 29 10 39 68 26 94 36 22 58 70 21 91 11:00 23 24 47 46 18 64 28 15 43 61 36 97 34 7 41 59 36 95 23 12 35 1 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 1 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 15 MINUTE COUNTS STREET:ARDMORE AVE LOCATION:N/0 GOULD AVE DATE 07-11-87 NORTH BOUND AM PM SOUTH BOUND TOTAL TIME NORTH SOUTH TOTAL BOUND BOUND 11 6 17 22 13 35 15 5 20 15 9 24 10 11 21 11 9 20 9 6 15 9 5 14 12 8 20 13 3 16 6 3 9 4 5 9 2 3 5 3 5 8 3 5 8- 1 3 4 1 2 3 2 2 4 4 0 4 1 1 2 4 3 7 5 0 5 3 2 5 7 5 12 10 1 11 7 - 6 13 10 1 11 12 4 16 17 3 20 16 7 23 20 4 24 28 7 35 32 16 48 43 11 54 29 16 45 34 19 53 41 21 62 43 _ 17 60 54 17 -71 69 42 111 49 25 74 82 29 111 57 25 82 47 30 77 82 30 112 77 24 101 72 30 102 75 30 105 12:00 1:00 2:00 _ 3:00 4:06 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 72 31 103 81 27 108 81 36 117 72 24 96 91 37 128 74 27 101 82 27 109 80 22 102 83 28 111 77 43 120 56 24 80 75 27 102 68 25 93 84 28 112 60 45 105 69 49 118 68 29 97 70 32 102 76 26 102 96 38 134 83 34 117 75 30 105 74 32 106 71 36 107 59 39 98 73 32 105 74 29 103 57 25 82 68 28 96. 63 21 . 84 56 21 77 47 12 59 40 27 67 56 29 85 50 11 61 57 16 73 35 16 51 37 27 64 47 11 58 30 9 39 28 15 43 29 7 36 33 15 48 31 16 47 34 9 43 26 9 35 32 7 39 22 12 34 • STREET:GOULD AVE LOCATION:E/0 ARDMORE EAST BOUND AM WEST BOUND NEWPORT TRAFFIC Siuuico 15 MINUTE COUNTS DATE 07-10-87 PM TOTAL TIME EAST WEST BOUND BOUND 17 27 44 29 19 48 11 20 31 11 26 37 15 16 31 6 15 21 19 9 28 7 10 17 6 5 11 6 15 21 2 6 8 8 7 15 3 5 8 2 1 3 0 0 0 3 3 6 3 4 7 6 5 ' 11 4 2 6 5 1 6 7 5 12 16 9 25 21 10 31 28 12 40 41 8 49 50 33 83 58- 31. 89 66 43•. 109 84 46 130 79 71 150 93 63 156 113 76 189 109 79 188 97 75 172 103 68 171 101 70 171 97 56 153 102 82 184 72 67 139 84 66 150 86 81 167 83 . 71 154 73 69 142 95 91 186 82 91 173 67 73 140 85 88 173 101 77 178 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 TOTAL 81 111 192 94 101 195 101 123 224 111 81 192 93 89 182 108 118 226 92 100 192 115 92 207 96 -103 199 78 102 180 98 99 197 108 98 206 115 104 219 110 88 198 112 88 200 115 100 2.15 93 84 177 116 113 229 96 109 205 97 113 210 99 120 219 119 127 246 107 101 208 126 101 227 101 123 22.4 90 131 221 79 117 196 97 126 223 97 118 215 88 130 218 83 114 197 96 111 ' 207- 89 98 187 89 96 185 68 97 165 72 80 152 72 88 160 156 95 61 54 94 148137 68 69 47 87 134 57 68 125 48 59 107 61 78 139 53 45 98 45 67 1.17 49 46 95 37 43 80 i i r 1 1 1 1 1 1 STREET:GOULD AVE LOCATION:W/0 VALLEY EAST BOUND NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 15 MINUTE COUNTS DATE 07-10-87 AM PM WEST BOUND TOTAL TIME EAST WEST TOTAL BOUND BOUND 14 27 41 13 21 34 8 14 22 7 2.1 28 10 10 20 7 15 22 18 7 25 7 7 14 6 5 11 2 7 9 2 2 4 5 6 11 2 2 4 3 2 5 1 0 1 3 5 8 3 4 7 4 5 9 2 3 5 3 3 6 8 4 12 8 1 9 12 4 16 25 8 33 30 5 35 29 -- 7 36 35 20 55 38 19 57 63 25 88 55 30 85 76 23 99 83 30 113 84 47 131 62 34 96 56 37 93 65 47 112 66 28 94 47 _ 62 109 46 42 88 43 36 79 44 ' 53 97 62 40 102 54 48 102 51 44 95 60 51 111 38 66 104 41 50 91 71 50 121 12:00 1:00 2:00 _ 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 42 69 111 60 72 132 57 83 140 70 62 132 55 46 101 62 63 125 59. 67 126 67 57 124 52 73 125 51 69 120 61 54 115 59 66 125 73 83 156 61 53 114 62 74 136 62 75 137 54 58 132 56 57 113 47 62 109 51 74 125 58 88 146 65 92 157 61 82 143 69 77 146 52 95 147 69 80 149 55 76 131 54 78 132 51 92 143. 59 82 • 141 66 91 157 50 86 136 58 78 136 54 85 139 52 69 121 37 59 96 49 65 114 45 65 110 42 63 105 47 63 110 41 67 108 42 63 105 30 49 79 53 72 125 34 53 87 38 36 74 40 35 75 28 35 63 1 3 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 15 MINUTE COUNTS STREET:GOULD AVE LOCATION:E%0 ARDMORE.AVE DATE 07-11-87 EAST BOUND AM PM WEST BOUND TOTAL TIME EAST WEST TOTAL BOUND BOUND 29 47 76 38 ; 46- 84 33 38 71 32 51 83 24 30 54 25 25 50 20 22 42 37 25 62 26 31 57 11 20 31 15 13 28 16 12 28 10 7 17 6 9 15 9 7 16 4 4 8 9 5 14 6 4 10 0 4 4 7 3 10 7 6 13 5 4 9 8 7 15 13 5 18 25 18 43 17_ 12 29 15 19. 34 23 19 42 37 18 55 31 20 51 38 2.5 63 45 45 90 51 43 94 59 41 100 63 31 94 70 44 114 72 73 145 69 49 118 88 60 148 107 78 185 89 80 169 101. 80 181 117 75 192 111 99 210 115 85 200 92 101 193 100 98 198 119 95 214 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 110 119 109 97 76 122 92 112 109 149 85 110 94 126 111 121 89 129 99 118 111 124 84 102 106 113 97 117 105 112 122 120 117 106 117 f14 123 106 125 119 141 90 83 114 108 118 99 109 93 112 114 106 94 124 102 96 89 105 83 112 88 106 71 97 80 102 74 76 78 71 75 80 72 77 75 86 64 72 52 81 53 71 45 59 68 71 52 63 60 50 36 62 36 66 48 48 229 206 198 204 258 195 220 232 218 217 235 186 219 214 217 242 223 231 229 244 231 197 226 208 205 220 21.8 198 194. 195. 194 168 182 156 149 155 149 161 136 133 12.4 104 139 115 110 98 102 96 a STREET:GOULD AVE LOCATION:W/0 VALLEY EAST BOUND AM WEST BOUND • NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 15 MINUTE COUNTS DATE 07-11-87 TOTAL TIME EAST BOUND 25 38 63 28 38 66 31 29 60 30 38 68 14 34 48 13 18 31 17 19 36 30 17 47 16 35 51 12 18 30 14 5 19 15 12 27 4 7 11 3 4 7 6 11 17 3 3 6 5 4 9 5 4 _ 9 2 2 4 5 4 9 4 5 ' 9 6 3 9 7 6 13 9 8 17 12 11 23 11_ 10 21 14 10 24 10 17 27. 20 18 38 22 15 37 27 17 44 26 26 52 29 37 66 35 25 60 48 24 72 52 36 88 45 47 92 54 28 82 48 45 93 71 63 134 67 54 121 62 51 113 66 71 137 65 57 122 76 57 133 65 62 127 59 73 132 61 74 135 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:=00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 75 53 57 61 72 60 49 63 69 57 61 54 72 60 53 74 78 69 80 103 89 74 66 66 67 73 59 65 54 61 67 53 44 60 51 52 57 48 51 29 36 32 38 38 56 27 28 33 PM WEST BOUND 97 77 79 68 100 103 86 114 93 95 100 105 76 84 82 98 91 90 67 87 68 57 97 76 73 69 97 70 72 64 85 84 81 77 78 55 63 67 61 66 56 65 65 38 49 56 49 42 TOTAL 172 130 136 129 177 163 1.:5 177 162 152 361 159 148 144 135 172 169 159 147 190 157 131 163 142 140 142 156 135 126 125 152 137 1?_ 137 0 120 11 112 9) 92 9/ 103 76 10`, 83 7/ .7`i NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES NEWPORT BEACH, CA STREET: GOULD AVE LOCATION: E/0 ARDMORE AVE A4 P DATE: 07-11-87 TIME 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 EAST BOUND WEST BOUND TOTAL 10:00 132 182 314 11:00 106 102 208 12:00 68 1:00 29 76 144 27 56 2:00 22 16 38 3:00 33 22 55 4:00 80 68 148 5:00 151 108 259 6:00 243 • 159 402 7:00 336 8:00 L8 260 596 9:00 10:00 426 334 379 752 805 387 450 837 399 506 905 383 473 856 430 462 892 482 .445 927 431 431 862. 403 438 841 331 420 751 307 329 263 316 636 579 218 264 482 11:00 4 226 06 180 --------0 6---- 12:00------12,751 6,258 ; _______________ A 011.3 Al6 &11/73 I AM P Ni 24 HOUR VOLUMES NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES NEWPORT BEACH, CA STREET: GOULD AVE LOCATION: E/0 ARDMORE DATE: 07-10-87 TIME 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:GO 10:00 EAST BOUND WEST BOUND TOTAL 11:00 68 92 160 12:00 47 50 97 1:00 22 33 55 2:00 8 9 17 3:00 18 12 30 4:00 72 36 108 5:00 215 115 330 6:00 369 256 625 7:00 410 292 702 8:00 9:00 355 271 626 337 312 649 10:00 335 329 664 11:00 387 416 803 12:00 408 399 807 380 402 782 452 380 832 402 419 821 451 449 900 367 497 864 364 473 837 318 371 255 346 689 601 213 292 505 184 201 385 6,437 6,452 12,889 1 3 3 a 3 3 _NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 15 MINUTE COUNTS STREET:VALLEY LOCATION:N/0 GOULD DATE 07-11-87 NORTH BOUND AM SOUTH BOUND PM TOTAL TIME NORTH SOUTH TOTAL BOUND BOUND 5 41 46 12:00 31 107 138 8 33 41 35 96 131 8 22 30 39 92 131 12 _ 28 40 30 79 109 6 28 34 1:00 34 89 123 7 25 32 44 103 147 8 24 32 35 98 133 3 19 22 32 91 123 8 21 29 2:00 38 82 120 4 18 22 43 67 130 5 15 2D 40 112 152 2 9 13. 38 71 109 0 15 15 3:00 43 81 124 3 10 13 27 88- 115 0 4 4 33 100 133 1 4 5 31 73 104 0 5 5 4:-00 34 107 141 2' 3 5 _ 31 .89 120 2 2 - 4 28 95 123 0 4 4 32 93 125 0 2 2 5:00 27 101 128 1 3 4 42 97 139 1 2 3 35 78 113 3 7 10 40 88 128 2 9 11 6:00 40 78 118 3 12 15 31 92 123 8- 15 23 32 86 17.8 14 1.1. 25 25 68 93 8 27 35 7:00 43 87 130} 8 30 38 25 76 101 11 26 37 35 86 . 121- 14 33 47 27 81 108 17 . 43 60 8:00 29 55 84 14 39 - 53 19 73 92 15 46 61 10 78 88 25 49 74 22 55 77 24 53 77 9:00 19 49 68 21. 68 89 19 70 89 27 60 87 20 43 63 29 72 101 21 42 63 3] 80 111 10:00 15 42 57 38 81 119 12 43 55 15 94 109 13 46 59 36 99 135 19 47 66 40 81 ].21. 11:00 12 .42 54 34 96 130 10 34 44 39 98 137 5 46 51 43 92 135 13 34 47 C6 nl SLJ-LT/�� &AI STREET:VALLEY LOCATION:N/0 GOULD NORTH BOUND 1 AM SOUTH BOUND 18 12:00 36 85 121 3 15 34 87 121. 6 24 30 33 89 122 5 12 17 47 87 134 3 12 15 33 1042 8 10 1:00 71 103 43 0 6 .6 40 91 131 1037 66 140 37 79 116 3 7 10 29 101 130 3 3 6 2:00 33 81 114 2 6 8 46 94 i40 0 3 3 335 106 44 3 0 5 5 104 145 41 2 3:00 141 0 2 32 109 0 0 0 0 28 120 148 0 04 4 25 132 157 4 4 165 1 0 4:00 42 123�5 0 132 lb. 0 4 4 39 133' 172 2 3 ' 39 130 2 2 4 47 69 3 3 6 5:00 138 i85 2 40 132 172 7 93 182 8 6 11 1 56 127 183 2 6 8 16 11 27 6:00 47 140 18736 149 185 18 _ 18 36 40 109 14923 22 45 37 11g 15646 - 38 84 53 35 88 7:00 35 123 15832 101 133 92 37 129 40 96 � �3b 86 71 157 26 � 105 � 131 106 64 170 77 96 99 71 170 8:00 129 9 5 77 196 56 69 125 50 21 91 112 53 81 134 29 66 S5 50 83 133 99 44 83 127 9:0035 64 9i ?.3 73 96 19 66 8534 - 71 7.05 22 55 77 37 70 107 6 45 9 18 32 74 106 10:00 24 485 69 33 87 120 � 13 41 54 6 26 59 85 108 10 69 318 778 106 11:00 18 q8 66 28 78 10 48 66 34 77 1114 26 96 122 8 46 8 53 5 54 33 94 127 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 15 MINUTE COUNTS DATE 07-10-87 TOTAL TIME NORTH BOUND PM SOUTH BOUND • TOTAL AM PM 24 HOUR VOLUMES NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES NEWPORT BEACH, CA STREET: GOULD AVE LOCATION: W/0 VALLEY DATE: 07-11-87 TIME EAST BOUND 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:C0 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 WEST BOUND TOTAL 114 143 257 74 88 162 57 70 127 16 25 41 17 14 31 26 22 48 47 48 95 95 76 171 164 122 286 218 183 401 260 233 493 261 266 527 246 321 567 244 403 647 241 393 634 259 . 340 599 330 335 665 • 295 264 298 309 593 573 235 305 540 207 291 498 185 144 r 257 442 224 368 144 • 196 340 4,143 4,962 9,105 AM P 24 HOUR VOLUMES NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES NEWPORT BEACH, CA STREET: GOULD AVE LOCATION: W/0 VALLEY DATE: 07-10-87 TIME 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12.:00 1:00 EAST BOUND WEST BOUND TOTAL 2:00 42 83 125 3:00 4:00 42 39 81 15 20 35 5:00 Q 9 18 6:00 7:00 12 15 27 8:G0 53 17 70 9:00 132 51 183 10:00 11:00 2.77 108 385 267 165 432 12:00 202 168 370 211 185 396 210 217 427 229 286 515 243 223 233 476 262 485 258 285 543 208 251 459 • 253 339 230 226 329 592 559 351 577 201 291 492 183 256 439 166 251 417 140 159 299 4,032 4,370 1 8,402 AM PM 24 HOUR VOLUMES NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES NEWPORT BEACH, CA STREET: VALLEY LOCATION: N/0 GOULD DATE: 07-11-87 TIME 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 • 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 NORTH BOUND SOUTH BOUND TOTAL 33 124 157 24 96 120 19 63 82 4 4 33 37 14 18 5 14 19 27 47 74 41 116 157 71 177 248 101 253 354 120 354 474 156 367 523 135 374 509 145 381 526 159 352 511 134 342 .476 125 384 509 •..• 144 364 508 128 324 452 130 330 460 80 261 341 79 59 204 178 283 237 40 156 196 1,963 1 1 5,308 7,271 Air PM 24 HOUR VOLUMES NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES NEWPORT BEACH, CA STREET: VALLEY DATE: 07-10-87 LOCATION: N/0 GOULD TIME 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 NORTH BOUND SOUTH BOUND TOTAL 4:00 5:00 17 63 80 6:00 9 31 40 7:00 5 17 22 8:00 0 6 6 9:00 10:00 5 9 14 13 27 40 11:00 12:00 103 89 192 337 207 544 258 304 562 138 297 435 122 297 419 121 345 466 150 348 498 147 307 454 443 384 827 126 152 465 591 543 695 176 546 722 .160 517 677 133 425 558 94 309 403 99 253 352 65 193 258 44 195 239 2,917 6,177 9,094 24 HOUR VOLUMES NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES NEWPORT BEACH, CA STREET: ARDMORE AVE LOCATION: N/0 GOULD AVE AM PM TINE 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 DATE: 07-10-87 1 NORTH SOUTH TOTAL BOUND BOUND 41 32 73 17 9 26 12. ; 11 23 12:00 1 3 4 1:00 6 8 14 41 10 51 251 29 280 563 99 662 460 - 108 568 247 92 339 255 91 1 346 236 111 347 335 127 462 327 104 431 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:GO 6:00 7:00 l 10:00 11:00 8:00 9:00 305— 147 452 12:00 362 283 1 645 395 ; 380 775 380 518 898' 343 314 657 286 171 457 270 102 372 38s 71 259 147 63 210 108 58 166 5,576 2,941 8,517 • INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA. NORTH -SOUTH STREET: VALLEY EAST -WEST STREET: GOULD AVE TIME: 4:00-5:00 P DATE: 07-09-87 45 440 122 7 85 23 9 108 28 12 119 34 17 128 37 Rt. Lt. V Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 10 238 33 0; 3; 3 37 10 56 5 66 7 4 79 11 Lt. Rt. Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Rt. 5; 16 <---; 56; 62 Lt. 13; 12 21 74 19 23: 82 24 65 274 68 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Lt. Rt. 1st 1. 16 7 2nd 4 29 3 3rd 8 38 8 4th 14 44 1.2 Total 27 127 30 1 1 a 3 3 3 3 INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA. NORTH -SOUTH STREET: VALLEY EAST -WEST STREET: GOULD AVE TIME: 8:00-9:00 A DATE: 07-09-87 5 225 136 1 49 27 1 56 32 2 68 44 1 52 33 Rt. Total 1s.t 2nd 3rd 4th 18;; 4; 5; 5 1 I - - - - 1 - - - - I I1 1 1 - - - - 258;1 57; 65; 77 ::----:---7:---- 37;; 10; 6; 11 4 Lt. 59;---> 10; Rt. Lt. V Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Rt. Lt. 6; 11; 15 16 33; 44 10 8; 12 9 32 1 41. 125; 31; 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Lt. Rt. 1st 9 58 5 2nd 1 58 5 3rd 4 66 9 4th 4 59 7 Total 18 241 26 INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA. NORTH -SOUTH STREET: ARDMORE AVE EAST -WEST STREET: GOULD AVE TIME: 8:00-9:00 A DATE: 07-09-87 3 ; 46 50 0 11 17 1 14 14 Rt. Lt. V Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 42; 9; 12 344; 80; 87 11; ; .6; 0 13 89 4 8 88 1 Lt. Rt. 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Lt. Total 1st 2nd 3ro 4th Rt. 29; 34 <---; 24; 49 Lt. 1; 3 37. 57 8 28; 128 51 181 5 17 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Rt. 1 101 8 3 84 8 4 90 3 11 86 11 10 361 37 INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA. NORTH -SOUTH STREET: ARDMORE AVE EAST -WEST STREET: GOULD AVE TIME: 5:00-6:00 P DATE: 07-09-87 8 278 84 Total 2 71 22 1st 2 66 21 1 ; 69 19 3 72 ; 22 Rt. 11) Total 3st 2nd 3rd 4th 40;; 10: 7; 12; 11 ::----:----:----:---- 374::I----'----'----'---- 374;; 89: 80; 106; 99 46:: 11; 10; 9; 16 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Lt. 2nd 3rd 4th Rt. Lt. 30 79 16 31; 36; 33: 84; 80: 84; 14: 14; 13; 130: 327; 57 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Lt. Rt. 20 59 14 24 66 31 24 69 25 74 93 268 11 3.9 55 INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH. CA. NORTH -SOUTH STREET: ARDh1ORE AVE EAST -WEST STREET: GOULD AVE TIKE: 4:00-5:00 P DATE: 07-09-87 8 260 110 1 62 36 2 67 19 2 77 ?6 3 ; 74 29 Rt. Total 1st 2nd ,3rd 4th 25;; 5 306; 57 35;; 8 5 77 .8 6 84 10 9 88 9 Lt. Rt. Lt. V Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4 t'h Rt. 31; 22 <--- 58; 68 Lt. 10; 9 29 79 12 34; 116; _ 1 1 77; 28?; 14;; 45' 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Lt. Rt. 1st 11 33 8 2nd 18 52 8 3rd 17 50 10 4th 20 56 12 Total 66 191 38 INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA. NORTH -SOUTH STREET: VALLEY EAST -WEST STREET: GOULD AVE TIME: 5:00-6:00 P DATE: 07-09-87 108 585 209 20 140 46 24 147 52 34 150 61 30 ; 148 ; 50 Rt. Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 46 9 366 84 83;; 17 12; 15; 10 96:99: 87 26;. 20; 20 Lt. Lt. Rt. Total 1st 2nd 3r•d 4th Rt. Lt. 10 95 19 -21 126 26 18 116 26 66 448 94 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Lt. Rt. lst 19 57 15 2nd 19 50 14 3rd 20 62 19 4th 22 66 20 Total 80 235 68 INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA. NORTH -SOUTH STREET: VALLEY EAST -WEST STREET: GOULD AVE TIME: 7:00-8:00 A DATE: 07-09-87 7 227 128 2 49 26 1 55 30 3 69 39 1 54 . 33 Rt. Lt. V Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 27 274 41 4 58 7 8; 9 70 9 77 13 6 69 12 1st 2nd Lt. Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Rt. 5; 10 • <--- 34; 31 Lt 8; 8 18 44 13 10 21 13 43 130 42 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Rt. 2 • 55 7 3 56 9 3rd 10 69 10 4th 11 66 7 Total 26 246 33 INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA. NORTH -SOUTH STREET: ARDMORE AVE EAST -WEST STREET: GOULD AVE TIME: 7:00-8:00 A DATE: 07-09-87 7 -53 68 1 10 14 1 12 15 4 18 22 1 13 17 Rt. Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 41 368 16 7; 9 88; 87 4; 2 15; 10 102; 91 51 5 V Lt. Total 1st 2nd 3rd i, t h • Rt. ; 24 <--- 27 Lt. 1 26 30 2 37 ; 31 58; 44 9; 4 118 159 16 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Lt. Rt. 1st 2 88 7 2nd 4 109 9 3rd 5 127 34 4th 3 111 9 Total 14 435 39 COLLISION DIAGRAM LOCATI/O�N 7'D { \V 7)Q, DRAWN IT �I i ti L DAT! P11100 753- sl2T NO. ACCIDENTS BY TYPE YIA1 TOTAL PROF. DAMAGI INJURY FATAL LIGHT DARK WET 5 2 3 RECEIVED SEP 3 1987 BOG -CM 7.--Z1-SS S 021 ( 1-1150/ D '3• ;) A LJ 0 • VEH. MOVING AHEAD VEH. BACKING UP PEDESTRIAN TRAIN PARKED VEHICLE FIXED OBJECT PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY INJURY ACCIDENT FATAL ACCIDENT Ow - LEGEND HEAD-ON HEAD-ON SIDESWIPE REAR END OVERTAKING SIDESWIPE RIGHT ANGLE APPROACH TURN OVERTAKING TURN OUT OF CONTROL VEHICLE TURNED OVER CONST DPD DV ES FTC HBO H -R ILC IP .1 IT INATT M/C RSS SFP VO VRW WS CONSTRUCTION ZONE DRIVER PHYSICAL DEFECT DEFECTIVE VEHICLE EXCESS SPEED FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE HAD BEEN DRINKING HIT AND RUN IMPROPER LANE CHANGE IMPROPER PASSING IMPROPER TURN INATTENTION MOTORCYCLE RAN STOP SIGN OR SIGNAL STOPPED OR SLOWING FOR VISIBILITY OBSTRUCTED VIOLATED RIGHT OF WAY WRONG SIDE OF STREET PEDESTRIAN • • COLLISION DIAGRAM LOCATION DRAWN IT VTOL DATI 1 FIIIOD 3 - !) /• c�?� NO. ACCIDENTS BY TYPE TSAR TOTAL PROP. DAMAGE INJURY FATAL LIGHT DARK WIT ll 11 2 0 0 VEH. MOVING AHEAD VEH. BACKING UP PEDESTRIAN TRAIN PARKED VEHICLE FIXED OBJECT PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY INJURY ACCIDENT FATAL ACCIDENT LEGEND HEAD-ON HEAD-ON SIDESWIPE REAR END OVERTAKING SIDESWIPE RIGHT ANGLE APPROACH TURN OVERTAKING TURN OUT OF CONTROL VEHICLE TURNED OVER CONST CONSTRUCTION ZONE DPO DRIVER PHYSICAL DEFECT DV DEFECTIVE VEHICLE ES EXCESS SPEED FTC FOLLOWING T00 CLOSE HBO HAD BEEN DRINKING H -R HIT AND RUN ILC IMPROPER IP IMPROPER IT IMPROPER INATT M/C RSS SFP VO VRW WS LANE CHANGE PASSING TURN INATTENTION MOTORCYCLE RAN STOP SIGN OR SIGNAL STOPPED OR SLOWING FOR PEDESTRIAN VISIBILITY OBSTRUCTED VIOLATED RIGHT OF WAY WRONG SIDE OF STREET fo r 'Ir VI RUN 08/10/87 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND. VICTIM DATA CUMULATIVE 01/01/87 THRU 06/30/87 NCIC CA1929'PAGE ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****.************> V I C;T I FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER P TYPE I SH RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD-SURF-C0t8]/-CO1 /-COND PED ACT M V I W T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T N LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y J *EL OESTE GOULD AV GOULD AV ACIFIC CST HWY GOULD AV ARDMORE AV GOULD AV EL DESTE GOULD AV EL OESTE GOULD AV GOULD TER 1/GOULD AV VALLEY OR I SUN 1929 CLEAR - 1 1 UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR 20M HNB0 012587 1854 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL REAREND 2 DRVR V 17M HNBD 78 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 3 DRVR 41F HNBD 2 230 W MON 1929 CLEAR - 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR 032387 0015 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL SIDESWP 122 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 2 DRVR 2 FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE ARDMORE AV GOULD AV FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE EL DESTE GOULD AV FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE EL OESTE GOULD AV 120 W FRI 1929 CLEAR - 1 022787 1835 1929 DRK-LGTS 106 DRY NORM / / 1 2 20 W THU 1929 CLEAR - 1 010187 0126 1929 DRK-LGTS 109 DRY NORM / / 2 ® HERMOSA AV I WED 1929 CLEAR - LONG FELLOW AV 031887 1514 1929 DAYLIGHT 87 DRY NORM / . / HERMOSA AV PIER AV 1 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR N0 CNTL SIDESWP 2 DRVR OTHER MV 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR CNTL OK SIDESWP 2 PRKD PARKED MV 3 PRKD 4 PRKD 1 R -O -W AUTO CNTL OK BRDSIDE OTHER MV PROC ST W PASSISTWGN PROC ST W PASSISTWGN LFT -TURN PASSISTWGN VOLK74 LANE CHANGE 2 DRVR V VOLK73 TOO CLOSE PONT68 42M HBDI PROC ST W PASSISTWGN PORS83 WRONG SIDE INATTENTION 21F HNBD PROC ST E PASSISTWGN CHEV70 • 1,8M HNB0 PROC ST W PICKUPIPAN DAT586 UNSAFE SPEED 2 DRVR V V 27F HNBD LFT -TURN W PASSISTWGN FORD74 V 18M HBDI PROC ST W PASSISTWGN FORD80 PARKED W PASSISTWGN TOYT78 PARKED W PASSISTWGN DATS85 PARKED W PICKUPIPAN VOLK71 1 DRVR 17F HNBD PROC ST E PASSISTWGN CHRY86 INATTENTION 2 DRVR 26F HNBD PROC ST N MOTORCYCLE 84 I THU 1929 CLEAR - - IMPROP TURN' 1 DRVR 27M HNBD 031287 1500 1929 .DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 76F HNBD 22 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV • RGT-TURN N PICK WITRL CHEV78 STOPPED .N PASSISTWGN BUIC84 au/ rit.s feEpoier 1 DRVR V RUN 08/10/87 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA CUMULATIVE 01/01/87 THRU 06/30/87 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAT LOC WETHRI K I HR FLT P C F FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN SII RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD-SURF-COlD/-COND/-COND PED ACT 11 V 1 14 LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT *AMBY PL ® THIRTIETH a 0 14 / ARDMORE GOULD AV ARDMCRE 16 KARDMORE AV GOULD AV %ARDMORE AV 16 ARTESIA BL ACIFIC CST HWY *AUCREY AVIATION BL *AUBREY CT AVIATION BL AVIATION - ACIFIC CST HWY NCIC CA1929 PAGE <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V I C T I t P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT DVEHICLE SP OTHER P TYPE I J T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T N I Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y J I WED 1929 CLEAR - - 1 R -0-W AUTO 1 DRVR 032587 0624 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 109 DRY / / OTHER MV 3 PRKD 2 29M HNBD 37M HNBD I MON 1929 CLEAR - = M 1 STRTNGIBCKNG 1 DRVR IMPU 033087 1200 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REARM) 2 DRVR 26F HNBD 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV I SUN 1929 CLEAR - 2 1 R -0-W AUTO 1 DRVR 21F HNBD 030887 1549 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR C 29F HMO 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV I THU 1929 CLEAR 052887 0740 1929 78 DRY NORM / 2 - 1 1 TOO CLOSE DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REAREND / OTHER MV LFT -TURN N PICKUPIPAN PROC ST E PASS I STL.'GN PARKED W PASSISTWGN D0ME77 BI14 81 BUIC77 BACKING N OTHER BUS 85 STOPPED N PASSISTWGN VOLK83 ENT TRAF W PASSISTWGN DATS86 PROC ST N PASSISTWGN TOYT77 2 DRVR C 2 PASS C 1 DRVR 27M HNBD PROC ST E PASSISTWGN DODG71 INATTENTION 2 DRVR C 2 DRVR C 34M HNBD SLOWING E PASSISTWGN BMW 80 I WED 1929 CLEAR - - 1 STRTNGIBCKNG 1 DRVR 040887 2215 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL SIDESLIP 2 DRVR 109 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 2 FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE ACIFIC CST HWY ARTESIA BL 46M IMPU BACKING W PASSISTWGN HOND78 17M HNBD STOPPED E PASSISTWGN VOLK78 I THU 1929 CLEAR - - 1 R -0-W AUTO 1 DRVR 19F HNBD 050787 1850 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK SIDESLIP 2 DRVR 33M HMO 80 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV PROC ST E PASSISTWGN DATS87 VIS OBSCURED ENT TRAF E PASSISTWGN OLDS85 I MON 1929 CLOUDY - 1 1 UNSAFE SPEED 1 BICY C 26M HNBD FROC ST W BICYCLE VIS OBSCURED 1 BICY C 2 042787 1842 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL OTHER 2 DRVR 30F MOD LFT -TURN E PASSISTWGN FORE87 VIS OBSCURED 87 DRY NORM / / BICYCLE FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE ACIFIC CST HWY AVIATION fi A^ RUN 05/02/87 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA NCIC CA1929 PAGE CUMULATIVE 01/01/87 THRU 03/31/87 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F V ICT 7 FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIMME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCISN I 4e`SH RT POSTMILE 5 BADGE RD -SURF -rnI:ni-rromi-rn,in PED ACT ..., . P TYPE LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT T i Y _ <MWM*MWMW*******I N V 0 1 V E 0 P A R T Y S***M**WW*W**WWW*> P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT 0 V E H I C L E SP OTHER T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS 4" ACIFIC CST HWY I MON 1929 CLEAR -. 1 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 38M HNBD 9 020287 1025 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR C 18M HNOD ON 1 B 21.121 N 121 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV Arr Irk ACIFIC CST HWY I WED 1929 CLEAR - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 48M HNBD 9 020487 0647 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK HEAD-ON ON 1 B 21.121 S 87 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 2 DRVR 22F HNBD ACIFIC CST HWY I TUE 1929 CLOUDY - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 32F HNBD 9 031087 0734 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK HEAD-ON ON 1 B 21.121 N 87 DRY NORM / • / OTHER MV 2 DRVR 45F HNBD w fi ACIFIC CST HWY 100 S THU 1929 CLEAR - 1 OTHER HAZ 1 BICY C 11F HNBD 9 031287 1653 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CHTL OTHER 2 DRVR 20M HNBD 106 DRY NORM / / BICYCLE 3 *AMBY PL THIRTIETH / ARDMORE GOULD AV ARDMORE 16 ARTESIA BL ACIFIC CST HWY I WED 1929 CLEAR - - 1 R -0-W AUTO 1 DRVR 032587 0624 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 109 DRY / / OTHER MV 3 PRKD 2 I MON 1929 CLEAR - - M 1 STRTNGIBCKNG .1 DRVR 033087 1200 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REAREND 2 DRVR 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 29M HNBD 37M HNBD IMPU 26F HNBD I SUN 1929 CLEAR - 2 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 21F HNBD 030887 1549 1929 ' DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR C 29F HNBD 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS. SEE AVIATION FOR INTERSECTION COLLI$ION•DETAILS. SEE ACIFIC CST HWY M ACIFIC CST HWY ARTESIA BL • ACIFIC CST HWY AVIATION LFT -TURN E PASSISTWGN PROC ST N PICKUPIPAN LFT -TURN S PASSISTWGN PROC ST N PASSISTWGN LFT -TURN S PICKUPIPAN PROC ST N PASSISTWGN PROC ST S BICYCLE PROC ST E PASSISTWGN LFT -TURN N PICKUPIPAN PROC ST E PASSISTWGN PARKED W PASSISTWGN PLYM66 STOPIGO TRAF 2 DRVR C TOYT86 VIS OBSCURED DATS86 TOYT80 DODG85 HOND81 IMPROP TURN VIS OBSCURED VIS OBSCURED HAZ MOVEMENT VIS OBSCURED VIS OBSCURED is INATTENTION 1 BICY C BUIC72 VIS OBSCURED DOME77 BMW 81 BUIC77 BACKING N OTHER BUS 85 STOPPED N PASSISTWGN VOLK83 • ENT TRAF W PASSISTWGN DATS86 PROC ST N PASSISTWGN TOYT77 2 DRVR C 2 PASS C RUN 05/02/87 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA NCIC CA1929 PAGE CUMULATIVE 01/01/87 THRU 03/31/87 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K. I HR FLT P C F <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V I C T I FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETIIR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER P TYPE I SH RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD-SURF-COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT M V I W T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T N LOCAL REPORT NO.DST BEAT Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y J *EL OESTE I SUN 1929 CLEAR - •1 1 UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR ' 20M HNBD PROC ST W PASSISTWGN VOLK74 LANE CHANGE 2 DRVR V GOULD AV 012587 1854 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL REAREND 2 DRVR V 17M HNBD PROC ST W PASSISTWGN VOLK73 TOO CLOSE 78 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 3 DRVR 41F HNBD LFT -TURN PASSISTWGN PONT68 2 r, GOULD AV 230 W MON 1929 CLEAR 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 ORVR 42M HBDI PROC ST W PASSISTWGN PORS83 WRONG SIDE ACIFIC CST HWY 032387 0015 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL SIDESWP INATTENTION r' 122 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 2 DRVR 21F HNBD PROC ST E PASSISTWGN CHEV70 2 h MOND GOULD AV FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE EL OESTE EL OESTE GOULD AV GOULD AV 120 W FRI 1929 CLEAR - 1 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR 18M HNBD PROC ST W PICKUPIPAN DATS86 UNSAFE SPEED 2 DRVR V GOULD TER 022787 1835 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 DRVR V 27F HARD LFT -TURN W PASSISTWGN FORD74 106 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 1 2 GOULD AV 20 W THU 1929 CLEAR - 1 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR V 18M HBDI PROC ST W PASSISTWGN FORD80 1 DRVR V VALLEY DR 010187 0126 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK SIDESWP 2 PRKD PARKED W PASSISTWGN TOYT78 109 DRY NORM / / PARKED MV 3 PRKD PARKED W PASSISTWGN DATS85 2 4 PRKD PARKED W PICKUPIPAN VOLK71 HERMOSA AV I WED 1929 CLEAR - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 17F HNBD PROC ST E PASSISTWGN CHRY86 INATTENTION LONG FELLOW AV 031887 1514 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 26F HNBD PROC ST N MOTORCYCLE 84 87 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV HERMOSA AV • PIER AV I THU 1929 CLEAR - - IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR 27M HNBD RGT-TURN N PICK WITRL CHEV78 031287 1500 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 76F HNBD STOPPED N PASSISTWGN BUIC84 22 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV *HERMOSA AV I THU 1929 CLEAR - - 1 HAZ PARKING 1 DRVR M IMPU PROC ST W PICKUPIPAN DATS85 RUNAWAY VEH THIRTY 5 022687 0001 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 PRKD PARKED PICKUPIPAN .CHEV81 119 DRY NORM / 1. PARKED HV 2 HERMOSA AV I SAT 1929 CLEAR::'.' - M 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR 19M H8DI PROC ST S PASSISTWGN CHEV78 UNSAFE SPEED .. 1 032887 0700 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL REAREND INATTENTION 106 NORM / =/ OTHER MV 2 PRKD PARKED S PASSISTWGN • TOYT79 1 2 3 PRKD PARKED S PASSISTWGN HOND80 RUIN 03/02/87 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA NCIC CA1929 PAGE 0 CUMULATIVE 01/01/86 THRU 12/31/86 a I1 1 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETIIR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN SH RT POSTHILE S BADGE RD-SURF-COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT M V I W LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT <********w*****wI N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V I C T I P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER P TYPE I T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T N Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y J I CULPER CT 200 N SUN 1929 CLOUDY - - M 1 OTHER HAZ 1 DRVR PROC ST N PICKUPIPAN CHEV66 INATTENTION MONTEREY 030286 1923 1929 • DRK-NO L NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 PRKD PARKED PASSISTWGN CHEV75 95 DRY NORM / . / PARKED I1V 86872 DROMORE AV PIER AV 863932 *GENTRY PROSPECT AV 863660 GOULD AV ARDMORE GOULD AV MCRNINGSIDE 861640 GOULD LN EL OESTE 861360 GOULD LN MORNINGSIDE DR 861944 *GREENWICH VLG HERMOSA AV 8639611051 *GREENWICH VLG DR HERMOSA AV 273 N TUE 1929 CLEAR - 1 F UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR 090286 0152 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL HIT OBJ 118 DRY NORM / / FIXED OBJ I SUN 1929 CLEAR - 2 1 R -0-W AUTO 081786 1011 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL OTHER 78 DRY NORM / / BICYCLE 3 FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE ARDMORE GOULD AV 1 BICY C 1OF HNBD 2 DRVR 45F HNBD I FRI 1929 CLEAR - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 26M HNBD 041886 1338 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL REAREND 2 DRVR 66F HNBD 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 150 W TUE 1929 CLOUDY - - 1 UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR 25M HNBD 040186 0702 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 65 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 2 DRVR 61M HNBD I TUE 1929 CLEAR - - M 1 UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR 050686 1819 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REAREND 2 DRVR 109 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV TMPU 18M HNBD I WED 1929 CLOUDY - - STRTNGIBCKNG 1 DRVR 28M HNBD 090386 2219 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL REAREND 2 PRKO 87 DRY NORM / / PARKED HV I MON 1929 CLEAR - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 100686 1748 1929 •-DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 78 DRY NORM / '"/ OTHER MV 2 52M HNBD 16F HNBD PROC ST S MOTORCYCLE 80 1 PASS C J U-TURN N BICYCLE INATTENTION 1 PASS V PROC ST N PASSISTWGN VOLV84 1 BICY C ENT TRAF N PICKUPIPAN ENT TRAF S PASSISTWGN FORD71 INATTENTION CHEV80 R -O -W AUTO INATTENTION MERGING W PASSISTWGN PONT82 IMPROP TURN OTHER EGPMNT PROC ST W PICKUPIPAN FORD72 PROC ST W PASSISTWGN BUIC85 STOPPED W PASSISTWGN MERC78 PARKING' S PICKUPIPAN PARKED E MOTORCYCLE PROC ST W PASSISTWGN PROC ST N PASSISTWGN FORD79 '85 CADI84 INATTENTION FORD81 RUN 03/02/87 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA NCIC CA1929'PAGE CUMULATIVE 01/01/86 THRU 12/31/86 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y 5****************> FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER SH RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD-SURF-COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT M V I W T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS qb *ARDMORE 16 ei 0 860613 / *ARDMORE / GOULD AV *ARDMORE PIER AV 86615 *ARDMORE PIER AV 863462 ARDMORE 1 PL ARDMORE 10 110 862713 021 "ARDMORE AV GOULD AV *ARDMORE AV PIER AV OA INC1016860670 to I FRI 1929 CLOUDY - - 1 STRTNGIBCKNG 1 DRVR 021486 1053 1929 RAINNG DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 PRO 118 WET NORM / / PARKED MV I SUN 1929 CLOUDY - - M 1 TOO CLOSE 1 DRVR 111686 1215 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REAREND 2 DRVR 121 DRY NORM / / • OTHER MV 2 I FRI 1929 RAINNG - - 1 STOP SGNISIG 1 DRVR 021486 1733 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 114 WET NORM / / OTHER MV I WED 1929 CLEAR 080686 1120 1929 95 DRY NORM / I THU 1929 CLEAR 091836 0835 1929 114 DRY NORM / - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR / OTHER MV 43M HNBD BACKING W TRUCKITRAC H IMPU 58F HNBD 23F HNBD 27M HNBD 42F HNBD 31M HNBD - 1 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR C 414F DAYLIGHT NO CNTL REAREND 2 PRKD / PARKED MV I WED 1929 CLOUDY - 1 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR V 29M HBDI 062586 1803 1929 DUSKDAWN NO CNTL HIT OBJ 87 DRY NORM / / FIXED OBJ I SAT 1929 CLEAR 101886 0011 1929 109 DRY NORM / 2 I TUE 1929 CLEAR 021886 1223 1929 89 WET NORM / 1 DRK- -LGTS CNTL OK HIT OBJ / FIXED OBJ 1 DRVR 16F IMPU - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR / OTHER MV 20F HNBD 31M HNBD 79 BRAKES PARKED W PASSISTWGN HOND79 PROC ST W PICKUPIPAN DOME INATTENTION STOPPED W PASSISTWGN VOLV80 PROC ST E PASSISTWGN PROC ST S PASSISTWGN PROC ST W PASSISTWGN PROC ST N PICKUPIPAN CHEV85 DATS82 UNFAM WIROAD BUIC81 CHEV76 INATTENTION V I C'T I P TYPE I T N Y J PROC ST N PASSISTWGN FORD79 UNFAM WIROAD 1 DRVR C PARKED N PASSISTWGN BUIC76 PROC ST N PASSISTWGN PONT83 UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR V : RGT-TURN N PASSISTWGN PLYM66 OTHER EQPMNT PROC ST E PASSISTWGN BMW 74 PROC ST S PASSISTWGN FORD72 i • A RUN 02/25/86 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA NCIC CA1929 PAGE CUMULATIVE 01/01/85 THRU 12/31/85 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1. K I HP FLT P C F <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V I C T I M FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN P TYPE I AGE S 0 P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER P TYPE_ I A S4 RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD -SURF -COND/-CONO/-COND PED ACT M V I W T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T -NS LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y J •. GOULD AV I MON 1929 CLEAR - - 1 1R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 22M HNBD PROC ST W PASSISTWGN OATS84 INATTENTION VALLEY DR 051385 1855 1929 DUSKDAWN CNTL OK BRDSIDE STOPIGO TRAF 106 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV OTHER 85-01839 2 2 DRVR M HNBD PROC ST S PASSISTWGN VOLV81 INATTENTION STOPIGO TRAF GOULD LN ARDMORE AV FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE ARDMORE AV GOULD LN GOULD LN I WED 1929 CLOUDY - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 23M HNBD ENT TRAF N PASSISTWGN • SUBA84 VIS OBSCURED GOULD TER 052285 1757 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 21F HNBD PROC ST E PICKUPIPAN CHEV78 VIS OBSCURED 65 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85-2046 GREENUICH VLG I FRI 1929 CLOUDY' - - 1 BRAKES 1 DRVR 28F HNBD RANOFFRD W PASSISTWGN TOYT80 RUNAWAY VEH PALM DR 102585 0815 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK HIT OBJ 111 DRY NORH / / FIXED OBJ 2 85-4828 HARPER 11 PL 854747 I SAT 1929 CLEAR - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 37M HNBD RGT-TURN N PASSISTWGN TOYT77 VIS OBSCURED 101985 1644 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK SIDESWP 2 DRVR 33F HNBD PROC ST E PASSISTWGN TOYT82 VIS OBSCURED 114 DRY OBSTR/CONST/NAROW OTHER MV *HERMOSA AV I WED 1929 RAINNG - - 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR 33F HBDI OPPOS LN N PICKUPIPAN FORD76 UNSAFE SPEED HEROI:DO AV 050885 2025 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL HEAD-ON 2 PRKD PARKED W PASSISTWGN VOLK68 107 WET NORM / / OTHER MV 3 PRKD PARKED W PICKUPIPAN TOYT79 85-1816 1 HERMOSA AV I WED 1929 CLEAR - - 1 IMPROP PASS 1 DRVR 57M HNBD PROC ST N PICKUPIPAN CHEV82 LYNDON 031385 0918 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 DRVR 29M HNBD PROC ST N OTHER 81 87 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85-999INCx1018 HERMOSA AV I MON 1929 CLEAR - - 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR 22M HNBD LFT -TURN W PASSISTWGN FORD81 R -O -W AUTO PIER AV 0225S5 1950 1929 DRK-NO L CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 22M HNBD PROC ST S PASSISTWGN FORE 81 DRY NORII / / OTHER MV 85-0773 _ HERMOSA AV PIER AV 85-1749 1 I FRI 1929 CLEAR -. - 1 DRVR ALC1DRG 1 DRVR 23M HBDI PROC ST N PASSISTWGN HOND INATTENTION 050385 0042 1929 :DRK-LGTS REAREND 2 DRVR 30F STOPPED N PASSISTWGN MAZD84 110 DRY NORM / / ' • OTHER MV RUN 02/25/86 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA CUMULATIVE 01/01/85 THRU 12/31/85 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN SH RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD-SURF-COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT 11 V 1 14 LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT *ARDMORE AV GOULD LN 85-4487 *ARDMORE AV PIER AV 85-4785 ARDMORE AV 21 85-39862-1063 ARDMORE AV 4 85-4673 ARDMORE AV 8 85-2155 ARTESIA BL MEADOWS AV ON 91 6 85-00121-T NCIC CA1929 PAGE <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE HAKE INFO ASSOCIATED Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS I TUE 1929 CLEAR - - 1 UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR 81M HNBD 100185 2115 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK REAREND 2 DRVR 17M HNBD 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 3 DRVR 1811 HNBD I MON 1929 RAINNG - 1 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 51F HNBD 102185 1851 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR V 29M HNBD 65 WET NORM / / OTHER MV I SUN 1929 CLEAR 090185 1802 1929 119 DRY NORM / I MON 1929 CLEAR 101485 1537 1929 65 DRY NORM / I WED 1929 CLEAR 052985 1600 1929 57 DRY NORM / 1 - - 1 STOP SGNISIG 1 DRVR 39M HNBD DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 26F HNBD • / OTHER HV - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR / OTHER MV - - H 3 WRONG SIDE DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REAREND / PARKED MV 144 W MON 1929 RAINNG - 1 1 UNSAFE SPEED 010785 1747 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK REAREND 190 W 208 WET NORM / / OTHER HV 8 1 *ARTESIA BL 1 PACIFIC CST HWY ON 1 B 21.890 N 85-737 ARTESIA BL PACIFIC CST ON 1 B 21. 85-1420 1 DRVR 2 PRKD 3 DRVR 1 DRVR 2 DRVR 25M HNBD 31F HMO 68H HNBD IMPU 23F HNBD 19M HNBD I SAT 1929 CLEAR - - R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 22F HNBD 022385 1832 1929 • DRK-LGTS CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 22M HNBD 114 DRY / / OTHER HV I THU 1929 CLEAR - 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR HWY 041185 1030 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REAREND 2 DRVR 919 N 89 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 3 38M HBDI M HNBD PROC ST W PASSISTWGN 00D885 SLOWING W PASSISTWGN TOYT72 STOPPED W PASSISTWGN TOYT78 PROC ST E PASSISTWGN MERC85 PROC ST N PASSISTWGN VOLK67 PROC ST N PASSISTWGN LFT -TURN W PASSISTWGN LFT -TURN S PASSISTWGN PROC ST N PASSISTWGN PROC ST N PICKUPIPAN PARKED N PASSISTWGN PROC ST PASSISTWGN PROC ST W PASSISTWGN STOPPED W PASSISTWGN CHEV84 INATTENTION MERC81 CHEV82 MAZ083 CHEV78 BUIC85 PONT72 UNINVLVD VEH V I C T I 1 P TYPE I 1 T N Y J 2 DRVR V HOND82 INATTENTION 1 PASS C VOLK79 STOPIGO TRAF ENT TRAF W PASSISTWGN MAZD83 PROC ST N OTHER BUS PROC ST W PICKUPIPAN STOPPED N PICKUPIPAN 84 CHEV82 UNSAFE SPEED FORD84 RUN 02/25/86 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY ANO VICTIM DATA NCIC CA1929 PAGE CUMULATIVE 01/01/85 THRU 12/31/85 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V I C T I M FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER P TYPE I A SH RT POSTMILE S DADGE RD-SURF-COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT M V I W T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T -11 S LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y J ARDMORE I MON 1929 CLEAR - - 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR 17M HNBD LFT -TURN S PASSISTWGN CHEV79 ) GOULD LN 021885 1635 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 28M HNBD STOPPED N PASSISTWGN FORD84 81 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV ) ) ) 85-0658 *ARDMORE I TUE 1929 CLEAR - 1 3 STOP SGNISIG 1 DRVR 85M PROC ST E PASSISTWGN CHEV66 INATTENTION 3 BICY V 1 PIER AV 073085 1233 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 38F STOPPED S PASSISTWGN MERZ83 22 DRY NORM / / • OTHER MV 3 BICY V 16M OTHER W BICYCLE 85-3361 ARDMORE 40 N FRI 1929 CLEAR - 1 1 UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR 16M HNBD PROC ST S PASSISTWGN VOLK76 OTHER 1 PASS C 1 PORTER : 110585 2348 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL OVERTRN .. 99 DRY NORM / / NON-CLSN 85-5052 2 ARDMORE I THU 1929 CLEAR - - WRONG SIDE 1 DRVR 42M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN VOLV67 11 050985 1646 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 DRVR 56M HNBD PROC ST S SCHOOLBUS 83 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85-1827 ARDMORE I WED 1929 CLEAR - - 1 STOP SGNISIG 1 DRVR 34F HNBD LFT -TURN W PASSISTWGN DATS79 p 11 071785 2006 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 50M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN DATS85 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV ) 85-3090 ARDMORE I SAT 1929 CLEAR -• - 1 STOP SGNISIG 1 DRVR 24M HBDN LFT -TURN W PASSISTWGN MERC85 3 021685 2121 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 31M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN MAZD71 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85631 3 ARDMORE AV I FRI 1929 CLEAR - 1 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 21M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN HON078 2 BICY V 2 ) GOULD AV 100485 1705 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK OTHER 2 BICY V 24F HNBD LFT -TURN E BICYCLE 114 DRY NORM / / BICYCLE ) 85-4631 ARDMORE AV I THU 1929 CLEAR - 1 1 WRONG SIDE 1 BICY V 13F HNBD PROC ST W BICYCLE HAZ MOVEMENT 1 BICY V 1 GOULD LN 080885 1735 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK OTHER 2 DRVR 49M HNBD RGT-TURN N PASSISTWGN CHEV85. 57 DRY NORM / / BICYCLE ) 85-3526 2 1 'C f K7TNu" ,1 1: to Ae�,'M a RUN 11/09/85 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA CUMULATIVE 01/01/85 THRU 09/30/85 NCIC CA1929 PAGE ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHRI K I HR FLT P C F <W**************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V I C T I FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME PICIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER P TYPE I SII RT FOSTttILE S BADGE RD-SURF-COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT HVIWT N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T N LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y J 1 cip RT 1 I TUE 1929 CLOUDY - 1 1 IMPROP PASS 1 DRVR 66F HNBD PROC ST S PASSISTWGN BUIC73 8 PL 091085 1130 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 DRVR C 28M HNBD STOPPED S EMERGENCY CHEV83 ON 1 B 21.081 S 109 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 854133 3 RT 1 I SUN 1929 CLEAR - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR M HNB0 LFT -TURN S PASSISTWGN PONT84 INATTENTION 9 041485 1239 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 49M HNBD OTHER N PICKUPIPAN CHEV78 INATTENTION ON 1 B 21.121 N 106 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85-01473 1 3 2 DRVR C RT 1 I THU 1929 CLOUDY - 1 1 PED VIOL 1 PED V 28M HNBD W VIS OBSCURED 1 PED V 40 9 050285 1358 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL VEHIPED 2 DRVR 31M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN PONT85 VIS OBSCURED ON 1 B 21.121 N 87 DRY NORM / • / XWK INT PEDESTRAN 85-17391034 41) VT RT 1 I TUE 1929 CLEAR - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 45F HNBD LFT -TURN S PASSISTWGN FORD85 STOPIGO TRAF 9 052885 0750 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 53M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN VOLK72 STOPIGO TRAF ON 1 B 21.121 N 71 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV DRK85-2129 3 RT 91 PROSPECT AV STRAND AV PIER AV FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION BETAILS, SEE PROSPECT AV RT 91 PIER AV STRAND AV *THE STRAND I FRI 1929 CLEAR - - IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR 41M HNBD RGT-TURN W EMERGENCY DATS85 14 070585 1430 1929 r DAYLIGHT NO CNTL HIT OBJ •89 DRY NORM / / FIXED OBJ 85-3057 1 THE STRAND 8 I SUN 1929 CLEAR ' - - 1 STRTNGIBCKNG 1 OTHR HNBD BACKING E EMERGENCY CHEV83 INATTENTION 042885 0530 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL HIT OBJ 117 DRY NORM / / FIXED OBJ 85-1677 1 TWENTY 8 FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE INGLESIDE INGLESIDE TWENTY 8 VALLEY DR FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE GOULD AV GOULD AV VALLEY DR RUN 11/09/85 • REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA CUMULATIVE 01/01/85 THRU 09/30/85 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN ® SH RT POSTtIILE S BADGE RD-SURF-COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT M V I W LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT j • *DUNCAN AV PACIFIC CST HWY ON 1 B 22.230 85-2223 *EL DESTE DR GOULD AV 85-3568 O *GENTRY AV PROSPECT AV 85-984 0 GOULD AV EL DESTE DR GOULD AV GOULD TER 85-4266 • *GOULD AV VALLEY DR 85-01889 GOULD LN • GOULD TER --85 -2046 *HERMOSA AV HERONDO AV O 85-1816 HERMOSA AV • LYNDON 85-999INC41018 I SUN 1929 CLEAR 060285 2305 1929 S 81 DRY NORM / - - 1 DRVR ALCIDRG DRK-LGTS CNTL OK REAREND / PARKED MV I SAT 1929 CLEAR - - 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 081085 1350 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL REAREND 106 DRY NORM / / OTHER HV 2 1 I TUE 1929 CLEAR 031285 1115 1929 89 DRY NORM / 3 NCIC CA1929 PAGE <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS 1 DRVR 2 PRKD 1 DRVR 2 DRVR 23M HBDI 46M HBDI 17F HNBD - 1 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR C 59M HBDI DAYLIGHT ND CNTL HIT OBJ / FIXED OBJ FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE EL DESTE DR GOULD AV 27 W THU 1929 CLEAR - - 1 IHPROP TURN 1 DRVR 31M HNBD 091985 0825 1929 . DAYLIGHT NO CNTL REAREND 2 PRKD 116 DRY NORM / / PARKED MV I MON 1929 CLEAR - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 051385 1855 1929 DUSKDAWN CNTL OK BRDSIDE 106 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 2 2 DRVR 22M HNBD M HNBD I WED 1929 CLOUDY - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 23M HNBD 052285 1757 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 21F HNBD 65 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV I WED 1929 RAINNG - - 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 050885 2025 1929 ' DRK-LGTS NO CNTL HEAD-ON 107 WET NORM / / OTHER MV 1 I WED 1929 CLEAR - - 1 IMPROP PASS 031385 0918 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 87 DRY NORM /. / OTHER MV 1 DRVR 2 PRKD 3 PRKD 1 DRVR 2 DRVR 33F HBDI 57M HNBD 29M HNBD OTHER S PASSISTWGN FORD68 UNSAFE SPEED PARKED S PASSISTWGN VOLK68 PROC ST W PICK WITRL CHEV77 PROC ST W PASSISTWGN MAZ084 PROC ST S PASSISTWGN VOLK PROC ST E TRUCKITRAC PARKED E PASSISTWGN 79 V0LK75 INATTENTION T00 CLOSE V I C T ] P TYPE ] T f Y - UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR C PROC ST W PASSISTWGN DATS84 INATTENTION STOPIGO TRAF OTHER PROC ST S PASSISTWGN VOLV81 INATTENTION STOPIGO TRAF ENT TRAF N PASSISTWGN SUBA84 VIS OBSCURED PROC ST E PICKUPIPAN CHEV78 . VIS OBSCURED OPPOS LN N PICKUPIPAN PARKED W PASSISTWGN PARKED W PICKUPIPAN • FOR076 UNSAFE SPEED VOLK68 TOYT79 PROC ST N PICKUPIPAN CHEV82 PROC ST N OTHER 81 RUN 11/09/85 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA NCIC CA1929 PAGE ® CUMULATIVE 01/01/85 THRU 09/30/85 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V I C•T I t FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN P TYPE I AGE S 0 P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER P TYPE I I SH RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD-SURF-COND/-COND/-COUD PED ACT M V I W T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T N LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y J ;) ARDMORE I MON 1929 CLEAR - - 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR 17M HNBD LFT -TURN S PASSISTWGN CHEV79 GOULD LN 021805 1635 1929 • DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 28M HNBD STOPPED N PASSISTWGN FORD84 81 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85-0658 *ARDMORE I TUE 1929 CLEAR - 1 3 STOP SGNISIG 1 DRVR 85M PROC ST E PASSISTWGN CHEV66 INATTENTION 3 BICY V 3 PIER AV 073085 1233 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 38F STOPPED S PASSISTWGN MERZ83 22 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 3 BICY V 1611 OTHER W BICYCLE 85-3361 • ; • ARDMORE I THU 1929 CLEAR - - WRONG SIDE 1 DRVR 42M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN VOLV67 11 050985 1646 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 DRVR 56M HNBD PROC ST S SCHOOLBUS 83 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85-1827 ARDMORE I WED 1929 CLEAR - - 1 STOP SGNISIG 1 DRVR 34F HNBD LFT -TURN W PASSISTWGN DATS79 11 071785 2006 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 50M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN DATS85 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85-3080 ARDMORE I SAT 1929 CLEAR - - 1 STOP SGNISIG 1 DRVR 24M HUM LFT -TURN W PASSISTWGN MERC85 3 021685 2121 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 31M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN MAZD71 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85631 3 ARDMORE AV I THU 1929 CLEAR - 1 1 WRONG SIDE 1 BICY V 13F HNBD PROC ST W BICYCLE HAZ MOVEMENT 1 BICY V 3 GOULD LN 080885 1735 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK OTHER 2 DRVR 49M HNBD RGT-TURN N PASSISTWGN CHEV85 57 DRY NORM / / BICYCLE 85-3526 2 p ARDMORE AV I SUN 1929 CLEAR - - 1 STOP SGNISIG 1 DRVR 39M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN CHEV84 INATTENTION 21 090185 1802 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 26F HNBD LFT -TURN W PASSISTWGN MERC81 119 DRY NORM / ' / OTHER MV 85-39862-1063 ARDMORE AV I WED 1929 CLEAR - - M 3 WRONG SIDE 1 DRVR 68M HNBD PROC ST N PICKUPIPAN CHEV78 8 052985 1600 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REAREND 2 PRKD PARKED N PASSISTWGN BUIC85 57. DRY NORM / / PARKED 11V 3 DRVR IMPU PROC ST PASSISTWGN PONT72 UNINVLVD VEH 85-2155 1 MOM r RUN 08/06/85 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA NCIC CA1929 PAGE CUMULATIVE 01/01/85 THRU 06/30/85 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V I C T I FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL—DEV TYPCLSN P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER P TYPE I r4 SH RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD—SURF—COND/—COND/—COND PED ACT M V I W T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T N LCCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y J RT 1 I SAT 1929 CLEAR — 1 R—O—W AUTO 1 DRVR 59M HNBD LFT—TURN S PASSISTWGN AMER74 INATTENTION 7 031685 1137 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL OTHER 2 BICY 18M HNBD PROC ST N BICYCLE ON 1 B 1.973 N 78 DRY NORM / / BICYCLE 85-1043 3 Iii RT 1 I SAT 1929 CLEAR — — M 1 OTHER HAZ 1 PRKD PARKED N PASSISTWGN SUBA85 8 052585 1351 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 DRVR M IMPU PROC ST N PASSISTWGN VOLK HIT AND RUN • ON 1 B 2.191 N 87 DRY NORM / / PARKED MV 85-2089INCK1038 e� RT 1 I SAT 1929 CLEAR — — 1 UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR 26M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN DATS80 TOO CLOSE 8 PL 042785 1055 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL REAREND INATTENTION ON 1 B 21.070 N 78 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 2 DRVR 23M HNBD STOPPED N PICKUPIPAN DATS84 851653I037 3 3 DRVR 21M HNBD STOPPED N PASSISTWGN DATS75 RT 1 I SUN 1929 CLEAR — — 1 R—O—W AUTO 1 DRVR M HNBD LFT—TURN S PASSISTWGN PONT84 INATTENTION 9 041485 1239 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL DRDSIDE 2 DRVR 49M HNBD OTHER N PICKUPIPAN CHEV78 INATTENTION ▪ ON 1 B 21.121 N 106 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85-01473 1 3 p RT 1 I THU 1929 CLOUDY — 1 1 PED VIOL 1 PED V 28M HNBD W VIS OBSCURED 1 PED V 9 050285 1358 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL VEHIPED 2 DRVR 31M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN PONT85 VIS OBSCURED ON 1 B 21.121 N 87 DRY NORM / / XWK INT PEDESTRAN 85-17391034 1 • RT 1 I TUE 1929 CLEAR — — 1 R—O—W AUTO 1 DRVR 45F HNBD LFT—TURN S PASSISTWGN FORD85 STOPIGO TRAF 9 052885 0750 1929 .DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 53M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN VOLK72 STOPIGO TRAF ON 1 B 21.121 N 71 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV DR085-2129 3 RT 91 FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE PROSPECT AV PROSPECT AV RT 91 • THE STRAND I SUN 1929 CLEAR — — 1 STRTNGIBCKNG 1 OTHR HNBD BACKING E EMERGENCY CHEV83 INATTENTION 8 042885 0530 1929 . DRK—LGTS NO CNTL HIT OBJ 117 DRY NORM / / FIXED OBJ 85-1677 1 _ VALLEY DR . - GOULD AV FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE GOULD AV VALLEY DR RUN 08/06/85 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA NCIC CA1929 PAGE CUMULATIVE 01/01/85 THRU 06/30/85 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K .I HR FLT P C F <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V I C T I FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER P TYPE I SH RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD-SURF-COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT M V I W T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T N LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT 1 Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y J iCAMPANA PROSPECT AV 8S -1992I1036 I SUN 1929 CLOUDY - .1 WRONG SIDE 1 DRVR V 17M HNBD 051985 0947 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL 'HEAD-ON 2 PRKD 78 DRY NORM / / PARKED MV *DUNCAN AV I SUN 1929 CLEAR PACIFIC CST HWY 060285 2305 1929 ON 1 B 22.230 S 81 DRY NORM / 85-2223 *GENTRY AV PROSPECT AV 85-984 *GOULD AV VALLEY DR 85-01889 GOULD LN GOULD TER 85-2046 0 *HERMOSA AV HEROUO O AV 85-1816 HERMOSA AV LYNDON 85-999INCII1018 HERMOSA AV PIER AV 85-0773 I TUE 1929 CLEAR 031285 1115 1929 89 DRY NORM / 3 - 1 DRVR ALCIDRG DRK-LGTS CNTL OK REAREND / PARKED MV 1 DRVR 2 PRKD 23M HBDI - 1 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR C 59M HBDI DAYLIGHT NO CNTL HIT OBJ / FIXED OBJ I MON 1929 CLEAR - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 22M HNBD 051385 1855 1929 DUSKDAWN CNTL OK BRDSIDE 106 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 2 2 DRVR M HNBD I WED 1929 CLOUDY - - 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 23M HNBD 052285 1757 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 21F HNBD 65 DRY NORM / / • OTHER HV I WED 1929 RAINNG - - 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR 33F HBDI 050885 2025 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL HEAD-ON 2 PRKD 107 WET NORM / /' OTHER MV 3 PRKD 1 I WED 1929 CLEAR - - 1 IMPROP PASS 1 DRVR 57M HNBD 031385 0918 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP .2 DRVR 29M HNBD 87 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV I MON 1929 CLEAR - - 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR 022585 1950 1929 DRK-NO L CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 81 DRY NORM / : / OTHER MV 22M HNBD 22M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN HOND85 INATTENTION 1 DRVR V PARKED S PASSISTWGN TOYT75 OTHER S PASSISTWGN FORD68 UNSAFE SPEED PARKED S PASSISTWGN VOLK68 PROC ST S PASSISTWGN VOLK UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR C PROC ST W PASSISTWGN DATS84 INATTENTION STOPIGO TRAF OTHER PROC ST S PASSISTWGN VOLV81 INATTENTION STOPIGO TRAF ENT TRAF N PASSISTWGN SUBA84 VIS OBSCURED PROC ST E PICKUPIPAN CHEV78 VIS OBSCURED OPPOS LN N PICKUPIPAN PARKED W PASSISTWGN PARKED W PICKUPIPAN FORD76 UNSAFE SPEED VOLK68 TOYT79 PROC ST N PICKUPIPAN CHEV82 PROC ST N OTHER 81 LFT -TURN W PASSISTWGN FORD81 R -O -W AUTO PROC ST S PASSISTWGN FORE RUN 08/06/85 CUMULATIVE 01/01/85 THRU 06/30/85 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA NCIC CA1929 PAC ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHRI K I HR FLT P C F FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN tir• S4 RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD-SURF-COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT M V I W LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS ARDMORE I MON 1929 CLEAR - - 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR GOULD LN 021885 1635 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 81 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85-0658 ARDMORE 11 85-1827 • ARDMORE 3 85631 ARDMORE AV 8 85-2155 17M HNBD 28M HNBD LFT -TURN S PASSISTWGN CHEV79 STOPPED N PASSISTWGN FORD84 I THU 1929 CLEAR - - WRONG SIDE 1 DRVR 42M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN VOLV67 050985 1646 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 DRVR 56M HNBD PROC ST S SCHOOLBUS 83 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV I SAT 1929 CLEAR - - 1 STOP SGNISIG 1 DRVR 24M HBDN 021685 2121 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 31M HNBD 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 3 I WED 1929 CLEAR - - M 3 WRONG SIDE 1 DRVR 68M HNBD 052985 1600 1929 - DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REAREND 2 PRKD 57 DRY NORM / / PARKED MV 3 DRVR 1 ARTESIA BL 144 W MON 1929 RAINNG - 1 1 UNSAFE SPEED MEADOWS AV 010785 1747 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK REAREND ON 91 B .190 W 208 WET NORM / / OTHER MV 85-00121-T 8 1 *ARTESIA BL I SAT 1929 CLEAR PACIFIC CST HWY 022385 1832 1929 ' ON 1 B 21.890 N 114 DRY / 85-737 Ap, ARTESIA BL PACIFIC CST HWY ON 1 B 21.919 N 85-1420 -• - R -O -W AUTO DRK-LGTS CNTL OK BRDSIDE / OTHER MV I THU 1929 CLEAR - - 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 041185 1030 1929 • DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REAREND 89 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 3 ;• LFT -TURN W PASSISTWGN PROC ST N PASSISTWGN PROC ST N PICKUPIPAN PARKED N PASSISTWGN ,IMPU PROC ST PASSISTWGN 1 DRVR 423F HNBD 2 DRVR 19M HNBD 1 DRVR 2 DRVR 1 DRVR 2 DRVR ARTESIA BL 390 E TUE 1929 CLEAR - - 1 1 DRVR SEPULVEDA BL 040285 1132 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR ON 91 B .070 W 145 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85-01636T 8 1 22F HNBD 22M HNBD 38M HBDI M HNBD 31F HNBD 16M HNBD PROC ST W PASSISTWGN STOPPED W PASSISTWGN ENT TRAF W PASSISTWGN PROC ST N OTHER BUS PROC ST W PICKUPIPAN STOPPED W PICKUPIPAN LFT -TURN E PASSISTWGN PROC ST W MOTORCYCLE MERC85 MAZD 71 CHEV78 BUIC85 PONT72 UNINVLVD VEH V I C T P TYPE T Y HOND82 INATTENTION 1 PASS ( VOLK79 STOPIGO TRAF MAZD83 84 CHEV82 FORD84 CHRY84 UNSAFE SPEED VIS OBSCURED 83 VIS OBSCURED • RUN 05/09/85 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA NCIC CA1929 PAGE CUMULATIVE 01/01/85 THRU 03/31/85 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAT LOC WETHR1 K •I HR FLT P C F <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V.I CTI 1 FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT ()VEHICLE SP OTHER P TYPE I , n SH PT POSTMILE S BADGE RD -SURF -COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT M V I W T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T N LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT 1 Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y . J ® ARDMORE I MON 1929 CLEAR - 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR 17M HNBD LFT -TURN S PASSISTWGN CHEV79 GOULD LN 021885 1635 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 28M HNBD STOPPED N PASSISTWGN FORD84 81 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85-0658 ARDMORE I SAT 1929 CLEAR - - 1 STOP SGNISIG 1 DRVR 24M HBDN LFT -TURN W PASSISTWGN MERC85 3 021685 2121 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 31M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN MAZD71 V 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85631 3 •. ARTESIA BL 144 W MON 1929 RAINNG - 1 1 UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR 23F HNBD PROC ST W PASSISTWGN HOND82 INATTENTION 1 PASS C MEADOWS AV 010785 1747 1929 . DRK-LGTS CNTL OK REAREND 2 DRVR • 19M HNBD STOPPED W PASSISTWGN VOLK79 STOPIGO TRAF ON 91 B .190 W 208 WET NORM / / OTHER MV 85-00121-T 8 1 *ARTESIA BL I SAT 1929 CLEAR - - R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 22F HNBD ENT TRAF W PASSISTWGN MAZD83 PACIFIC CST HWY 022385 1832 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 22M HNBD PROC ST N OTHER BUS 84 ON 1 B 21.890 N 114 DRY / / OTHER MV 85-737 ARTESIA HWY I SAT 1929 CLEAR - 1 1 1 DRVR 19M HNBD. PROC ST W PASSISTWGN BUIC84 UNSAFE SPEED 2 PASS C ! PROSPECT 031685 1602 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 56M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN CHEV82 AS 91 B .151 W 118 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85-1047 , 3 AVIATION I THU 1929 CLEAR - - STRTNGIBCKNG 1 DRVR 39M HNBD BACKING E PICKUPIPAN VOLK70 INATTENTION PACIFIC CST HWY 020785 1203 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL REAREND 2 DRVR 32F HNBD STOPPED PICKUPIPAN FORD83 D 95 DRY NORM / /. OTHER MV 85-0494 r AVIATION BL I TUE 1929 CLEAR,. - - 1 T00 CLOSE 1 DRVR 35M HNBD PROC ST W PICKUPIPAN MAZD84 UNSAFE SPEED OCEAN 012285 1602 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REAREND 2 DRVR 26F HNBD STOPPED W PASSISTWGN SUBA83 STOPIGO TRAF 81 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 85-0299 *AVIATION BL I WED 1929 CLEAR - 1 F 1 PED VIOL 1 PED S 24F IMPU W PED VIOL 1 PED S , PACIFIC CST HWY 013085 2011 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK VEHIPED 2 DRVR IMPU . RGT-TURN N PASSISTWGN PORS79 UNSAFE SPEED ON 1 B 21.181 N 81 DRY NORM / / CROSSNG PEDESTRAN 85-0389 too - r Oft RUN 11/03/84 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA CUMULATIVE 01/01/84 THRU 09/30/84 * ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING ROW—CNTL TYPCLSN SH RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD—SURF—COND/LCOND/—COND PED ACT M V I W LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT GOULD LN ARDMORE AV 84-1196 *GOULD LN VALLEY DR 84-2991#1064 HERMOS AV 4 ST 24-26031123 HERMOSA AV LONGFELLOW 84-1780 *HERMOSA AV LONGFELLOW ST 84-2291 HERMOSA AV PIER AV DR#84-2202 HERMOSA AV PIER AV 84-2587 *HERMOSA AV TWENTY 7 84-0268 NCIC CA1929 1 <***************I N V 0 L V E D PAR Ty S****************> P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED Y COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS 140 E WED 1929 CLEAR 1' 1 WRONG SIDE 1 DRVR V 35F IMPU 032884 1721 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK HEAD—ON 2 DRVR 26M HNBD 81 DRY NORM / •/ OTHER MV I TH 080984 184 57 DRY 2 I SA 071484 233 57 DRY 1 8 S FR 051884 195 81 DRY I TU 062684 174 81 DRY U 1929 CLOUDY • 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR 16F HNBD 0 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK HEAD—ON 2 DRVR F HNBD NORM / ./ OTHER MV T 1929 CLEAR 1 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR V 24M 2 1929 DRK—LGTS NO CNTL REAREND 2 PRKD NORM / / PARKED MV 3 PRKD 4 PRKD I 1929 CLEAR M 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR 50M HBDI 6 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REAREND 2 PRKD NORM / / PARKED MV E 1929 CLEAR M 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR, 16F IMPU 9 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK SIDESWP 2 PRKD NORM / / OTHER MV I TUE 061984 2329 71 DRY 1 I SAT 071484 0155 81 DRY I TUE 011784 1342 114 DRY 1929 CLEAR 1 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR C 21M HBDI 1929 DRK—LGTS CNTL OK BRDSIDE NORM / / OTHER MV 2 DRVR 22M HBDN 1929 CLEAR 1 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR C 24F HBDU 1929. DRK—LGTS CNTL OK REAREND 2 DRVR 18F HBDN NORM / / OTHER MV 1929 CLEAR 1 IMPROP DRVNG 1 DRVR 30M HNBD 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 PRKD OTHER/ • / PARKED MV PROC ST E PASSISTWGN HOND78 PROC ST W PASSISTWGN MERC74 V•I C P TYI T Y LANE CHANGE 1 DR4 IMPROP PASS STOPIGO TRAF LFT—TURN N PASSISTWGN HON082 WRONG SIDE STOPPED S PASSISTWGN MERC81 DRUG PROC ST N PICKUPIPAN TOYT84 INATTEHtION 1 DRVI PARKED N PICKUPIPAN CHEV77 PARKED N PASSISTWGN HOND74 PARKED N PICKUPIPAN FORE81- LFT—TURN S PICKUPIPAN PARKED S PASSISTWGN RGT—TURN E PICKUPIPAN PARKED W PASSISTWGN LFT—TURN E PASSISTWGN PROC ST N PASSISTWGN FORD73 IMPROP TURN PONT78 FORD72 IMPROP TURN MAZD80 FORD77 R—O—W AUTO 1 DRVR INATTENTION TOYT84 INATTENTION PROC ST N PASSISTWGN CHEV SLOWING N PASSISTWGN TOYT79 RGT—TURN W TRUK WITRL. PARKED W PASSISTWGN, • TOO CLOSE 1 DRVR 79 UNFAM WIROAD VOLK67 RUN 11/03/84 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA CUMULATIVE 01/01/84 THRU 09/30/84 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHRI K I HR FLT P C F FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING ROW-CNTL TYPCLSN SH RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD-SURF-COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT M V I W LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT THE STRAND TWENTY 2 ST 84-0385 THE STRAND 6 ST 84-2339 THIRTIETH ST 41 INGLESIDE 41 11) a 84-0366 TWENTY 7 HERMOSA AV TWENTY 7 ST MORNINGSIDE DR TWENTY 7 ST PALM DR VALLEY 8 ST 841085 VALLEY DR GOULD AV VALLEY DR GOULD LN VALLEY DR HERONDO VALLEY DR HERONDO ST NCIC CA1929 PAI <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V I C T P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER P TYPE T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y I TUE 1929 CLEAR • NOT DRIVER 1 DRVR 012484 1343 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL HIT OBJ 114 DRY NORM / / FIXED OBJ I FRI 1929 CLOUDY 1 062984 0729 1929 DAYLIGHT 112 DRY NORM / / 1 13 51M HNBD PROC ST N PASSISTWGN PLYM68 UNFAM WIROAD OTHER 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 BICY C 43F HNBD PROC ST N BICYCLE NO CNTL OTHER NON-CLSN 156 W MON 1929 CLEAR 1 012384 2500 1929 DAYLIGHT N 114 DRY NORM / 1 UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR C 17M HNBD PROC ST E • MOPED 82 0 CNTL BRDSIDE '2 DRVR 28F HNBD BACKING N PASSISTWGN FORE81 OTHER MV FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE HERMOSA AV TWENTY 7 FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE MORNINGSIDE DR TWENTY 7 ST FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE PALM DR TWENTY 7 ST I TUE 1929 CLEAR 1 1 STOP SIGISGN 1 DRVR 76M HNBD 032084 0836 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR C 22F HNBD 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE FOR INTERSECTION COLLISiON DETAILS, SEE GOULD AV VALLEY DR GOULD LN VALLEY.DR HERONDO VALLEY DR HERONDO ST VALLEY DR PROC ST S PASSISTWGN FORD62 PROC ST E PASSISTWGN TOYT76 1 BICY • • 1DRVR I 2 DRVR C 7 RUN 11/03/84 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA �► CUMULATIVE 01/01/84 THRU 09/30/84 a r * ON PRIMARY P•D DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING ROW-CNTL TYPCLSN SH RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD -SURF -COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT M V I W LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT CIRCLE CT MONTEREY AV 841180 CULPER CT 4 ST 84-1692 NCIC CA1929 PAGE <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E N I C L E SP OTHER T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS I TUE 1929 CLEAR 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR 30F HNBD U-TURN W PASSISTWGN PLYM77 032784 0931 1929 DAYLIGHT CHTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR M HNBD LFT -TURN W TRUCKITRAC 77 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV I FRI 1929 CLEAR • M 1 STRTNGIBCKNG 051184 2220 1929 DRK-NO L NO CNTL REAREND 57 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 1 1 DRVR 2 PRKD *CYPRESS I SAT 1929 CLEAR 2 1 R -O -W PED 1 DRVR 27M HNBD PIER AV 051284 1320 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK AUTIPED 116 DRY NORM / / XWK INT PEDESTRAN 2 PED V 52M HNBD 84-1697 1 3 PED V 1M HNBD CYPRESS AV 8 ST 84-677 GOLDEN AV 15 ST 84-3101 GOULD PACIFIC CST HWY 6 84-0116 9 GOULD AV ARDMORE DR 84-3652 I TUE 1929 CLEAR 1 STRTNGIBCKNG 1 DRVR 69M HNBD 021484 1211 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL REAREND 2 PRKD 51 DRY NORM / / PARKED MV 1 600 N FRI 1929 CLEAR M 1 1 DRVR 081784 1107 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL HEAD-ON 2 PRKD 115 DRY NORM / / PARKED MV 3 PRKD 3 36M HNBD 100 W SUN 1929 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR M HNBD 010884 1436 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 PRKD 112 DRY NORM / / PARKED MV 2 376 E SUN 1929 CLEAR 1 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR V 61M HNBD 093084 1630 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK SIDESWP 2 DRVR 28F HNBD 116 DRY NORM / • / OTHER MV 2 *GOULD AV I WED 1929 VALLEY DR 090584 2200 1929 102 • / INC104584-3395 2 2 1 F .1 DRVR OTHER 2 BICY V 17M BICYCLE S PICKUPIPAN CHEV74 INATTENTION PARKED S PASSISTWGN VOLK78 I. LFT -TURN W PICK WITRL S S BACKING E PICKUPIPAN PARKED S PASSISTWGN PROC ST N PICKUPIPAN PARKED PASS WITRL PARKED PASS WITRL SLOWING E EMERGENCY V I C T I P TYPE I T N Y J CHEV80 WRONG SIDE 2 PED• V INATTENTION 3 PED V DODG77 MERZ81 DODG81 OTHER BUIC80 VOLK70 81 PARKED E PASSISTWGN MERC77 UNINVLVD VEH PROC ST W MOTORCYCLE CHANG.LN W PASSISTWGN W PASSISTWGN . S BICYCLE • 73 TOYT78 1 DRVR V t T.OYT82 2 BICY V ] /"N irN T REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA CUMULATIVE 01/01/84 THRU 12/31/84 . ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HP FLT P C F **************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V I C T FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN P TYPE I AGE S 0 P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER P TYPE SH RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD-SURF-COND/-COND/-GOND PED ACT M V I W T LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y NCIC CA1929 PA GOULD AV 350 E SA ARDMORE 121584 110 95 DRY 84-4300 GOULD AV ARDMORE DR 84-3652 T 1929 CLEAR - - 1 IMPROP TURN. 1 DRVR 57M HNBD 0 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 DRVR 42M HNBD NORM / / OTHER MV 376 E SUN 093084 1630 116 DRY 2 MERGING W PASSISTWGN . FORD80 INATTENTION PROC ST W PICKUPIPAN FORD73 IMPROP PASS ' 1929 CLEAR - 1 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR V 61M HNBD PROC ST W MOTORCYCLE 73 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK SIDESWP 2 DRVR 28F HNBD CHANG LN W PASSISTWGN • TOYT78 NORM / / • OTHER MV *GOULD AV I WED 1929 VALLEY DR 090584 2200 1929 102 / / INC104584-3395 2 2 GOULD LN ARDMORE AV 84-1196 GOULD LN PACIFIC CST HWY 84-4259 2 *GOULD LN VALLEY DR 84-2991#1064 HARPER AV AVIATION BL 84-8245 HERMOS AV 4 24-26031123 - 1 F OTHER BICYCLE 1 DRVR 2 BICY V 17M 140 E WED 1929 CLEAR - 1 1 WRONG SIDE 1 DRVR V 35F IMPU 032884 1721 1929' DAYLIGHT CNTL OK HEAD-ON 2 DRVR 26M HNBD 81 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV I MON 1929 CLEAR 121084 1934 1929 116 DRY NORM / - - 2 OTHER HAZ DRK-LGTS CNTL OK REAREND / OTHER MV 1 DRVR 2 DRVR I THU 1929 CLOUDY - - 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR 080984 1840 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK HEAD-ON 2 DRVR 57 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 2 39 S TUE 1929 CLEAR •- - M 1 UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR 121184 1734 1929 DUSKDAWN NO CNTL REAREND 2 PRKD 99999 DRY NORM / / PARKED MV I SAT 1929 CLEAR 071484 2332 1929 57 DRY NORM / 1 - 1 1 DRVR ALCIDRG DRK-LGTS NO CNTL REAREND / PARKED MV 48M HNBD 42F HNBD 16F HNBD W PASSISTWGN TOYT82 S BICYCLE PROC ST E PASSISTWGN HOND78 PROC ST W PASSISTWGN MERC74 1 DRVR 2 BICY LANE CHANGE 1 DRVR IMPROP PASS STOPIGO TRAF PROC ST W EMERGENCY CHEV81 PROC ST W PASSISTWGN DATS83 INATTENTION OTHER EQPMNT LFT -TURN N PASSISTWGN HON082 WRONG SIDE F HNBD STOPPED S PASSISTWGN MERC81 1 DRVR V 24M 2 PRKD 3 PRKD 4 PRKD . IMPU PROC ST S PICKUPIPAN FORD INATTENTION PARKED S PASSISTWGN FORE78 DRUG PROC ST N PICKUPIPAN PARKED N PICKUPIPAN PARKED N PASSISTWGN PARKED N PICKUPIPAN TOYT84 INATTENTION 1 DRVR V CHEV77 H0ND74 FORE81 tr RUN 03/19/85 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA r % NCIC CA1929 PAGE CUMULATIVE 01/01/84 THRU 12/31/84 414 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V I C T I FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER P TYPE I pp��,, 5H RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD -SURF -COND/-COND/-GOND PED ACT M V I W T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T N 0 LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y J 1 CIRCLE CT MONTEREY AV 841180 CULPER CT 4 84-1692 yy, *CYPRESS V PIER AV 84-1697 *CYPRESS AV PIER AV 843939 CCYPRESS AV 84-677 GOLDEN AV 15 84-3101 GOULD MORNINGSIDE 84-4330 GOULD PACIFIC CST HWY 84-0116 GOULD AV ARDMORE I TU 032784 093 114 DRY I FR 051184 222 57 DRY 1 E 1929 CLEAR - - 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR 1 1929 DAYLfGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR NORM / / OTHER MV I 1929 CLEAR - L M 1 STRTNGIBCKNG 1 DRVR 0 1929 DRK-NO L NO CNTL REAREND 2 PRKD NORM / / OTHER MV I SAT 051284 1320 116 DRY 1 30F HNBD M HNBD 1929 CLEAR - 2 1 R -O -W PED 1 DRVR 27M HNBD 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK VEHIPED NORM / / XWK INT PEDESTRAN 2 PED V 52M HNBD 3 PED V 1M HNBD I THU 1929 CLOUDY - 1 1 R -O -W PED 1 DRVR 74F HNBD 110184 1901 1929 DRK-LGTS NO CNTL VEHIPED 2 PED V 66M HNBD 107 DRY NORM / / XWK INT PEDESTRAN 2 I TUE 021484 1211 51 DRY 1 600 N FRI 081784 1107 115 DRY 3 1929 CLEAR - - 1 STRTNGIBCKNG 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL REAREND NORM / / PARKED MV 1 DRVR 2 PRKD U-TURN W PASSISTWGN PLYM77 LFT -TURN W TRUCKITRAC 77 S PICKUPIPAN CHEV74 INATTENTION PARKED S PASSISTWGN VOLK78, LFT -TURN W PICK WITRL CHEV80 WRONG SIDE 2 PED V ! INATTENTION 3 PED V S S PROC ST W PASSISTWGN CHEV83 N 69M HNBD BACKING E PICKUPIPAN DODG77 PARKED S PASSISTWGN MERZ81 1929 CLEAR - - M 1 1 DRVR 36M HNBD 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL HEAD -0N 2 PRKD NORM / / PARKED MV 3 PRKD I WED 1929 RAINNG - - 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR 56M HBDI 121984 1944 1929 .DRK-LGTS CNTL OK BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 34F HNBD 114 WET NORM / :/ OTHER MV 100 W SUN 1929 010884 1436 1929 112 DRY NORM / 2 - - IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 PRKD / PARKED MV FOR INTERSECTION COLLISION DETAILS, SEE ARDMORE GOULD AV PROC ST N PICKUPIPAN PARKED PASS WITRL PARKED PASS WITRL PROC ST W PICKUPIPAN LFT -TURN S PASSISTWGN DODG81 OTHER BUIC80 VOLK70 TOYT76 STOP SIGN DATS79 M HNBD SLOWING E EMERGENCY 81 PARKED E PASSISTWGN MERC77 UNINVLVD VEH 2 PED V i 0 RUN 03/19/85 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA NCIC CA1929 PAGE CUMULATIVE 01/01/84 THRU 12/31/84 ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I. HR FLT P C F <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y&****************> V I C T I FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING CNTL-DEV TYPCLSN P TYPE I AGE S 0 P MOVEMENT OVEHICLE SP OTHER P TYPE I SH RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD -SURF -COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT M V I W T N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T N LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS Y J *ARDMORE I MON 1929 CLEAR - :1 1 STOP SGNISIG 1 BICY C 19M HNBD PROC ST S BICYCLE INATTENTION 1 BICY C ID GOULD AV 100184 1721 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK OTHER 2 DRVR 26F HNBD STOPPED W PASSISTWGN CHEV83 INATTENTION 116 DRY NORM / / BICYCLE 84-3662INC 2 a ARDMORE I MON 1929 CLEAR - 1 STOP SGNISIG 1 DRVR 84M HNBD PROC ST W PASSISTWGN CADI78 BRAKES GOULD LN 101584 1601 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK BRDSIDE OTHER EQPMNT 57 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 2 DRVR 66M HNBD PROC ST S PASSISTWGN 0LDS83 ® I4103184-3786 2 *ARDMORE I SUN 1929 CLEAR - 1 1 STOP SGNISIG 1 BICY C 29F 10 PIER 012984 1317 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK OTHER 2 DRVR 29F 114 DRY NORM / / BICYCLE 840459 • PROC ST W BICYCLE 1 BICY'C ; PROC ST W PASSISTWGN DOME *ARDMORE I FRI 1929 CLOUDY - - M 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR IMPU RGT-TURN S PASSISTWGN VOLK INATTENTION PIER AV 020384 1330 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 PRKD PARKED E PICKUPIPAN DOME54 57 DRY NORM / / PARKED MV 84-0537 1 *ARDMORE I THU 1929 CLEAR - 2 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR V 24M HBDI PROC ST W PASSISTWGN CHEV81 1 DRVR•V f ID PIER AV 030184 0245 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK REAREND 2 DRVR C 23F HBDN' STOPPED W PASSISTWGN FORD81 2 DRVR C i 117 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 84-0849 2 *ARDMORE I FRI 1929 CLEAR - 1 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 45F HNBD PROC ST E PASSISTWGN FORD78 2 DRVR C 1 PIER AV 081784 1700 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK SIDESWP 2 DRVR C 18M HNBD PROC ST S MOTORCYCLE 83 117 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV D 84-3105 • *ARDMORE 0 PIER AV 84-4354 I SAT 1929 CLEAR - 1 F 1 T00 CLOSE 1 DRVR IMPU PROC ST W PASSISTWGN FORD72 122284 1615 1929 :DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REAREND 2 DRVR 70F HNBD STOPPED W PASSISTWGN CHEV80 107 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 2 2 PASS C 7 ARDMORE I SAT 1929 CLEAR - 1 1 IMPROP PASS 1 DRVR V 17M HNBD PASSING N MOTORCYCLE 77 UNSAFE SPEED 1 DRVR V 1 THIRTIETH 080484 1446 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR 26M HNBD LFT -TURN N PASSISTWGN DATS81 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV D 842903 MEOW 91 RUN 08/07/84 REPORT 8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA CUMULATIVE 01/01/84 THRU 06/30/84 * ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING ROW-CNTL TYPCLSN SH RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD -SURF -COND/-COND/-COND PED ACT M V I W LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT GOULD LN ARDMORE AV 84-1196 HERMOSA AV LONGFELLOW 84-1780 NCIC CA192 <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER T' N SEX 1 2 PRECEDING ITYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE CHP YEAR FACTORS 140 E WED 1929 CLEAR 1 1 WRONG SIDE 1 DRVR V 35F IMPU 032884 1721 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK HEAD-ON 2 DRVR 26M HNBD 81 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 8 S FR 051884 195 81 DRY *HERMOSA AV I TU LONGFELLOW ST 062684 174 81 DRY 84-2291 HERMOSA AV PIER AV DR084-2202 P *HERMOSA AV TWENTY 7 r r, 84-0268 HERMOSA AV TWENTYFIRST CT 84973 HERMOSA AV 1 ST 841920 HERMOSA AV 10 • 84-0700 I TU 061984 232 71 DRY 1 I TU 011784 1342 114 DRY I 1929 CLEAR M 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR 50M HBDI. 6 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK REAREND 2 PRKD NORM /• / . PARKED MV E 1929 CLEAR M 1 IMPROP TURN 1 DRVR 9 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK SIDESWP 2 PRKD NORM / / OTHER MV PROC ST E PASSISTWGN HOND78 PROC ST W PASSISTWGN MERC74 LFT -TURN S PICKUPIPAN PARKED S PASSISTWGN FORD73 PONT78 V I P T Y LANE CHANGE 1 IMPROP PASS STOPIGO TRAF IMPROP TURN • 1IMPU RGT-TURN E PICKUPIPAN • FOR072 IMPROP TURN PARKED W PASSISTWGN MAZD80 E 1929 CLEAR 1 1 DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR C 21M HBDI 9 1929 DRK-LGTS CNTL OK BRDSIDE NORM / . / OTHER MV 2 DRVR 22M MON E 1929 CLEAR 1 IMPROP DRVNG 1 DRVR 1929 '• DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 PRKD OTHER/ / PARKED MV I MON 031284 1158 114 DRY I WED 053084 1246 114 DRY 1 'I THU 021684 1027 114 DRY LFT-TURN•E PASSISTWGN PROC ST N PASSISTWGN 30M HNBD RGT-TURN W TRUK WITRL FORD77 R -O -W AUTO INATTENTION TOYT84 INATTENTION 79 UNFAM WIROAD PARKED W PASSISTWGN VOLK67 1929 CLEAR 1 1 OTHER HAZ 1 DRVR C 25F HNBD PROC ST S PASSISTWGN VOLK71 .1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL REAREND 2 DRVR 47M HNBD PROC ST S PASSISTWGN LINC75 NORM / / . OTHER MV 1929 CLEAR 1 1 LANE CHANGE 1 DRVR C 61F HNBD PROC ST S PASSISTWGN FORD77 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL REAREND 2 PRKD NORM / / PARKED MV 1929 CLEAR 1 1 R -O -W AUTO. 1 DRVR 18M HNBD 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR V 20F HN80 NORM./ • : / OTHER MV • • • • • PARKED S PICKUPIPAN • ,FORD75 LFT -TURN W PICKUPIPAN VOLK81 PROC ST S PASSISTWGN MAZD80 TOO CLOSE 1 E 1 1 DI 2 DF fi RUN 05/06/84 REPORT.8. COLLISION LOCATION DETAILS --INVOLVED PARTY AND VICTIM DATA NCIC CA1929 PAGI CUMULATIVE 01/01/84 THRU 03/31/84 * ON PRIMARY RD DIST DR DAY LOC WETHR1 K I HR FLT P C F FROM SECONDARY RD DATE TIME NCIC WETHR2 LIGHTING ROW-CNTL TYPCLSN 5H RT POSTMILE S BADGE RD -SURF -GOND/-GOND/-GOND PED ACT M V I W LOCAL REPORT NO DST BEAT GOULD LN J' ARDMORE AV 84-1196 *HERMOSA AV TWENTY 7 84-0268 HERMOSA AV TWENTYFIRST CT 84973 HERMOSA AV 10 'Fer^ 84-0700 HERMOSA AV 10 CT 84-0936 HERMOSA AV 11 ST T 84-0330 is HERMOSA AV 11 ST 84-1091 HERMOSA AV 14 840347 Er • <***************I N V 0 L V E D P A R T Y S****************> V I C T: P TYPE I AGE S D P MOVEMENT D V E H I C L E SP OTHER P TYPE : T N SEX 1. 2 PRECEDING I TYPE MAKE INFO ASSOCIATED T Y J COLLISION R STATEWIDE . CHP YEAR FACTORS Y 140 E WED 1929 CLEAR 1 1 WRONG SIDE 1 DRVR V 35F IMPU 032884 1721 1929 DAYLIGHT CNTL OK HEAD-ON 2 DRVR 26M HNBD 81 DRY NORM / / • OTHER MV PROC ST E PASSISTWGN PROC ST W PASSISTWGN I TUE 1929 CLEAR 1 IMPROP DRVNG 1 DRVR 30M HNBD RGT-TURN W TRUK WITRL 011784 1342 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 2 PRKD 114 DRY OTHER/ / PARKED MV I MON 1929 CLEAR 1 1 OTHER HAZ 1 DRVR C 25F HNBD 031284 1158 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL REAREND 2 DRVR 47M HNBD 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV I THU 1929 CLEAR 1 1 R -O -W AUTO 1 DRVR 18M HNBD 021684 1027 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL BRDSIDE 2 DRVR V 20F HNBD 114 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV I THU 1929 CLEAR 1 LANE CHANGE 1 DRVR 030884 1212 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL REAREND 2 DRVR 114 DRY NORM / / PARKED MV 3 PRKD 1 I SAT 1929 CLEAR DRVR ALCIDRG 1 DRVR 012184 0050 1929 • DRK-LGTS CNTL OK REAREND 2 DRVR 89 DRY NORM / / OTHER MV 1• IMPU 24F HNBD HOND78 MERC74 LANE CHANGE 1 DRVR ' IMPROP PASS ' STOPIGO TRAF 79 UNFAM WIROAD PARKED W PASSISTWGN VOLK67 • :.PROC ST S PASSISTWGN VOLK71 • PROC ST S PASSISTWGN LINC75 TOO CLOSE LFT -TURN W PICKUPIPAN VOLK81 PROC ST S PASSISTWGN • MAZD80 • CHANG LN S PASSISTWGN PROC ST S PASSISTWGN PARKED S PASSISTWGN 22M HBDI PROC ST S PASSISTWGN 51M HNBD STOPPED S PASSISTWGN I TUE 1929 CLEAR • 1 1 IMPROP PASS 1 BICY C 33M HBDU 032084 1626 1929 ' DAYLIGHT CNTL OK ' OTHER 2 DRVR 34M HNBD 81 DRY NORM / / BICYCLE I SUN 1929 CLEAR 1 LANE CHANGE 012284 1228 1929 DAYLIGHT NO CNTL SIDESWP 114 DRY NORM / . / • OTHER MV • . 1 DRVR 2 PRKD 40M HNBD DATS VOLK84 CHEV83 UNFAM WIROAD CHEV69 UNSAFE SPEED MERZ74 1 DRVR 1 2DRVR ' PROC ST S BICYCLE R -O -W AUTO 1 BICY I RGT-TURN W PICKUPIPAN DATS81 IMPROP TURN PROC ST S OTHER BUS 81 OTHER PARKED S PASSISTWGN • CHEV82 Staff Alternate #1 Conceptual Design N GoOd Ave s a :r 4 • %V/ (;kie • I Gould Ave fi NOT TO SCALE CITY COUNCIL John Ciotti, Mayor ► Etta Simpson, Mayor Pro Tem Jim Rosenberger June Williams Tony DeBellls •4 Norma Goldbach, City Treasurer Kathleen Mldstokke, City Clerk • City of 2lermosa J3eacL Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 PRESS RELEASE MONDAY, OCTOBER 12,1987 ON FRIDAY, OCTOBER 9, 1987, MAYOR JOHN CIOFFI AND MAYOR PRO TEM ETTA SIMPSON MET WITH BRIAN J. WEBER OF THE SANTA FE PACIFIC REALTY CORPORATION AND FRANK J.A. GRECO OF TURRINI & BRINK, LAND PLANNING CONSULTANT FOR SANTA FE, TO DISCUSS THE RAILROAD PROPERTY WHICH PASSES THROUGH THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE RAILROAD STATED THAT THEY WERE SEEKING ZONE CHANGES ON THEIR PROPERTY IN ORDER TO MAXIMIZE THE RETURN ON THIS PROPERTY. THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY COUNCIL STATED THAT HERMOSA BEACH WAS AN EXTREMELY DENSE CITY WITH A REAL NEED FOR PUBLIC USE OPEN SPACE. BOTH PARTIES AGREED THAT FURTHER DISCUSSIONS COULD LEAD TO A MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL AGREEMENT AS TO THE ACQUISITION OF THE PROPERTY FOR CONTINUED USE AS PARKLAND BY THE CITY. AN ATMOSPHERE OF CONGENIALITY AND FLEXIBILITY LED BOTH PARTIES TO SCHEDULE A SUBSEQUENT MEETING ON FRIDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1987. GAY T. MARTIN INT IM CITY MANAGER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379-3312 / 376-6984 • Fire Department 376-2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 376-7981 / 376-6984 October 2, 1987 City Council Meeting of October 13, 1987 Mayor and Members of the City Council NOVEMBER 3, 1987 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TIE VOTES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council make a policy decision regarding the disposition of a tie vote should one occur. If the City Council wishes to hold a Special Election, the attached resolution must be adopted prior to Election Day. If the Council takes no action, a tie vote would be resolved by lot. BACKGROUND In the event of a tie vote (two or more persons receiving equal and highest number of votes for an `office to be voted upon), the tie vote may be resolved in one of two ways. BY LOT - The candidates shall be called before the Council and the winner determined by lot (tossing a coin, drawing of a name, etc.) BY SPECIAL ELECTION - The Council may adopt the attached resolution providing for the holding of a Special Election in the event of a tie vote. *,(,d67spt4J KATHLEEN MIDSTOKRE, City Clerk Noted: GAYLE . MARTIN, Interim City Manager 1 1986 Callfomla Election Manual TIE VOTES If at any election, two or more persons receive an equal and the highest number of votes for an office to be voted upon in a city, the tie shall be resolved in one of the following ways: (a) By Lot: The city council shall forthwith summon the candidates who have received the tie votes, whether upon the canvass of the returns by the council or upon a recount by a court, to appear before the council at a time to be designated by the council. The council shall at that time and place determine the tie by lot (e.g., tossing a coin, etc.). In order to maintain a sense of dignity In resolving a tie vote, one method would be to place each candidate's name in an unmarked, sealed envelope. The council can then select a person to draw an envelope and read the name of the winning candidate. (b) By Special Election: The legislative body may resolve a tie vote by the conduct of a special runoff election involving those candidates who receive an equal number of votes. A special runoff election shall be held only 11 the legislative body adopts the provisions of Section 20501 (b) of the Elections Code (Form 18), prior to the conduct of the election resulting in the tie vote. All future elections conducted by that body shall be resolved likewise, unless the legislative body later repeals the order for the conduct of a special runoff election. If a special runoff election Is held pursuant to those provisions, the legislative body shall call for the runoff election (Form 19) to be held on Tuesday, not Tess than 40 nor more than 125 days after the "Declaration of Result" (Form 17) for the election which resulted in a lie vote. If a regular election is to be held throughout the jurisdiction within such time period, the special runoff election shall be held on the same day as, and consolidated with, the regular election (Section 20501, Elections Code). Section 23302 requires that a request for consolidation be filed with the board of supervisors at least 88 days prior to the election and that names of candidates be filed with the County Elections Department at least 81 days prior to the election. Since the general municipal election date is approximately 60 days before the June primary, it is not possible to consolidate those elections. You may wish to consult Martin & Chapman Co. or your county elections department to select a date for the runoff election. Martin & Chapman Co. / 2131 Bixby Rd. / Lakewood, CA 90712-4168 / 213-426-2511 (8-85/0011e) -27- 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 87- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE CONDUCT OF A SPECIAL RUNOFF ELECTION FOR ELECTIVE OFFICES IN THE EVENT OF A TIE VOTE AT THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 1987. WHEREAS, Section 2050(b) of the Elections Code of the State of California authorizes the City Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions to require the conduct of a Special Runoff Election to resolve a tie vote involving those candidates who received an equal number of votes and the higher number of votes for an elective office; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 2050(b) of the Elections Code of the State of California, if any two or more persons receive an equal and the highest number of votes for an office to be voted for within the city, there shall be held within the city a Special Runoff Election to resolve the tie vote. A Special Runoff Election shall be called and held on a Tuesday not less than 40 nor more than 125 days after the administrative or judicial certification of the election which resulted in a tie vote. SECTION 2. That the provisions of Section 1 shall apply only to the election to be held on November 3, 1987 and shall then be repealed. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THIS TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1987. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 October 2, 1987 City Council Meeting of October 13, 1987 Mayor and Members of the City Council OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council make a policy decision regarding the inclusion under "Other Matters City Council" of an item entitled "Requests from Councilmembers for Possible Future Agenda Items." BACKGROUND At each meeting, Councilmembers bring before the Council items which they consider important and wish to have discussed. Because of the Brown Act, these items must be referred to staff by the chair and brought back for discussion at a future meeting. By listing those items Councilmembers wish to discuss under "Requests from Councilmembers for Possible Future Agenda Items", action may be taken to allow discussion of those specific items without delay. Should Council approve this new method, the deadline for submitting items to the City Manager's office would be Tuesday noon the week prior to Council meetings. a z /-z - &vi d ,-io‘zW_Je l KA 5HLEEN MIDSTOKK , City Clerk ea: GAYLE(fr. MARTIN, Interim City Manager 10a MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH PARKING AU - at t e our o 1:53 THORITY e . on Tues ay, August p.m. ROLL CALL: Chairman Cioffi - Present Commissioner Simpson - Present Commissioner Williams - Present Commissioner DeBellis - Absent Commissioner Rosenberger - Present A. CONSENT CALENDAR • 1) Approval ot minutes ot the February 24, 1987 meeting. Action: To approve minutes Motion Commissioner Simpson, second Cioffi. B. Proceeding with a Community Center Vicinity Parking Facility Legal opinion from City Attorney re. possible Grant Deed restrictions. Proposed Action: To receive and file. Motion Commissioner Rosenberger, second Williams Chairman Cioffi objected to the motion, stating that this issue was brought to our attention by the school district. They felt the we may be doing some- thing that violated the contract for the sale of the site. Since they brought the subject up and we have asked our attorney for a legal opinion, I would like to share it with them. Commissioner Rosenberger commented that he felt it was an incomplete response in that we haven't det- ermined what percentage of the property would have to be used for the parking facility and if the code would have to be amended. We need more facts. We could very well be subverting the intent of the zoning ordinance George Schmeltzer, 505 24th Place, representing the Community Center Foundation, addressed the Commiss- ioners: The whole nature of the agreement on the property is one of a consultative arrangement, it is not an agreement that sets up two waring factions. It's an agreement where community leaders have a resource and both have an interest in that resource and if any movement is going to be made, it can only be made in a consultative way. The proposal has some tremendous benefits to the functioning of the Community Center, in terms of reaching the goal that both groups set out to reach and that is that it be 1 4 a self supporting facility. He urged the Authority to continue discussion via sub -committee discussions. Action: To receive and file. AYES - Simpson, Rosenberger, Williams NOES - Ciof f i Final Action: To reschedule to a meeting in October at which time we will look at those areas of concern ie. what percentage of the property will be taken up by the parking facility and will the zoning code have to be amended. Motion Commissioner Rosenberger, second Williams, so ordered. Adjournment: 11:19 p.m. 2 Law Offices of James P. Lough JAMES P. LOUGH October 6, 1987 MEMORANDUM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 30 NORTH RAYMOND AVENUE SUITE 708 PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91103 (213) 381-6131 (818) 792-4728 (818) 792-4776 REGULAR MEETING OF HERMOSA BEACH PARKING AUTHORITY OF OCTOBER 13, 1987 TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Parking Authority FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney RE: Additional Public Parking on Former Pier Avenue School Property INTRODUCTION: The City Attorney was asked to render a further opinion on the issue of constructing a public parking garage about the Community Center. Attached is a copy of the July 22, 1987 memorandum previously submitted to the Parking Authority. Essentially, the City would have to amend Section 9.5-4 and prob- ably Section 9.5-2 in order to construct a parking facility at the Community Center. However, these problems could be circum- vented if the Planning Commission was able to make a finding that the ten percent (10%) coverage requirement be modified or waived due to design or topographical considerations. ANALYSIS: There are two major restrictions under the open space zone which would make it difficult if not impossible to construct a parking structure. The first Astriction is the lot coverage requirement under Section 9.5-2. Under this section, the maximum building coverage of land area in the open space zone cannot ex- ceed ten percent (10%). Additionally, Section 9.5-4 states that only ten percent (107o) of the land area of a particular parcel can be used for offstreet parking whether that parking is re- quired or not. These sections would seem to prohibit construc- tion of a parking structure without a text amendment which would allow for a parking structure that would cover more than ten percent of the area of the parcel in question. However, there is a possible method of accomplishing the purposes desired without a text amendment. Under Section 9.5-8, lot coverage maximums and parking limitations may be waived or modified by the Planning Commission. This section states in part as follows: Sections 9.5-2 through 9.5-7 may be waived or modified where in the opinion of the Planning Commission topography and/or design considera- tions warrant such waiver or modification. This section sets up a method by which approval could be gained without a text amendment. The key element would probably be the design considerations of the structure in question. If the structure could not be designed in a way which would be under the ten percent limitation but that parking would be necessary to meet the needs of the Community Center, a waiver or modifica- Liuil could probably be obtained. '1'nis standard would not be the same as a normal variance procedure which only relates to the land itself. The section in question, by its terms, adds consid- erations over and above topographical problems. CONCLUSION: Depending on the particular project that is brought forward, a text amendment may not be needed if design considera- tions outweigh the need to keep parking under ten percent of the land in question. If such a finding cannot be made by the Plan- ning Commission or. the City Council on appeal, a text amendment would be required which would apply to all open space lands. As to this and other issues which have been raised in the previous memo to the Authority, it is still the opinion of this office that officials of the School District should be consulted to determine their views on the legal concerns addressed. This is particularly important because of the deed restriction and the previously stated desire of the City Council to cooperate with the School District when possible. Finally, bond counsel should be brought in to review this matter at the earliest stage possi- ble. Legal problems dealing with the deed restrictions, Commun- ity Development Block Grant Funding restrictions, and other is- sues will need to be covered before any bonds could be issued to pay for construction of a parking structure. NOTED: Respectfully submitted, GAYLEd1ARTIN, City Manager 2 P. tOU C 1, City Attorr( y TY OF HERMOSA BEACH Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Parking Authority _July 22, 1987 .b Authority Meeting of July 28, 1987 LEGAL OPINION THAT THERE IS NOT A LEGAL IAMPEDIMENT IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER GRANT DEED VIS-A-VIS CITY PROCEEDING WITH A PUBLIC PARKING FACILITY RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Authority: 1. Accept the legal opinion 2. Direct a copy of the opinion to the Hermosa Beach School District requesting that they review it and advise the City/Authority by September 1 of their comments. BACKGROUND As a part of the Authority's consideration of developing addi- tional public parking facilities in the vicinity of the Hermosa Beach Community Center, staff was directed to obtain a legal opinion whether the City's grant deed to that property posed any limitations if a public parking facility were to be constructed. ANALYSIS Attached is the formal legal opinion of the City Attorney. It concludes that "...the City can proceed in construction of park- ing facilities at the former Pier Avenue School Site and not be in violation of any deed restriction." The opinion encourages the City to discuss the matter with the District, reserving the right to file a Declaratory Relief action in the Superior Court if the matter cannot be mutually agreed to. r Gre ory/T. JMeyer Gen ra 1 Manager Hermosa Beach Parking Authority attachment cc Hermosa Beach City Schools Law Offices of f aures P. ugh TAMES P. LOUGH REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 28 1987 MEMORANDUM July 21, 1987 30 NORTH RAYMOND AVENUE SUITE 708 PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91103 (213) 381-6131 (818) 792-4728 (818) 792-4776 TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FROM: JAMES P. LOUGH, CITY ATTORNEY Linda LeVanway, Paralegal RE: ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PARKING ON FORMER PIER AVENUE SCHOOL PROPERTY Introduction This office has been asked to give a legal opinion on whether there may be grant deed restrictions affecting the possible construction of additional public parking facilities at the Hermosa Beach. Community Center. In review of the grant deed between the City and School District, this office surmises that public parking is within an accepted use in that agreement. However, the School District may disagree with this conclusion. If the School District disagrees, the City Attorney would recommend the filing of a Declaratory Relief action in the Superior Court to determine if a parking structure may be placed at the Community Center. Analysis There are two conditions set forth in the grant deed that could be construed to affect the use of the subject property. The first states: B°If the City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corportation, or its successor in interest, shall ever trade, sell, exchange, or otherwise divest the city of title or rezone the property described in this Deed, the Hermosa Beach City School District, or its successor in interest, shall have the right to terminate the Grantee's interest herein through a legal proceeding filed in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California". The building of a parking facilty by the City would not divest the City of any interest in the property. .However, the building of a parking structure by the Hermosa Beach Parking Authority and the issuance of Certicates of Participation raises a closer question. The Parking Authority is a subentity of the City and would not result in a divestment of title. The Certificates issued would have to be drafted in a manner to prevent divestment, in the case of default, in the manner contemplated in the deed restriction. Currently, the property the Community Center is located on is zoned Open Space. Section 9.5-1, of the Hermosa Beach Zoning Code outlines the permitted uses under this zoning classification. The usage of said property can easily'be classified under the following permitted_uses or as an accessory use to any of the following uses: (c) Recreation centers, public and private. (f) Public governmental buildings. (g) Historical monuments and area of historical significance. To use parking as an accessory use, we must look at the Open Space code definitions. Section 9.5-4 requires that "No more than ten (10) percent of land area shall be used for off-street parking required or not". It would have to be determined what percentage of the subject property would be used for the proposed parking facility and -whether or not it falls within the ten percent limitation. If the parking allotment is beyond the ten percent limitation, this section could be modified. It should be amended anyway to delete the provision "required or not". The amendment to the Open Space code would not amount to a rezone under the deed restriction. Even though a parking facility is not listed under the permitted uses in a Open Space zone, it follows that the permitted buildings require parking and thus parking would be allowed. As stated above, the percentage of land devoted to parking would have to be determined. The second condition set forth in the deed that raises questions is one that restricts the usage of the property. It states: ' "The property granted herein shall not be used for any purpose other than for park, recreational, open space, educational or other community purposes". If the said property is used for any other purpose besides the purposes stated, it would enable the District to claim a reversion on a breach of the condition. (L.A. Cemetery Assn v. L.A 95 C 420) Clear and satisfactory evidence of the violation of -a condition is -required before a breach will cause the title to revert to the grantor. Thus, a conveyance which provided that "the premises herein conveyed shall be used... solely and only for permanent waterways, and canals, free to the public forever" does not prevent a city from converting the canals to public streets, where growth and changed condtions make such changes desirable for the convenience of the public. (Wattson- v. Eldridge 207 C 314) The clause contained in the subject deed is not specific as to what "community purposes" are included or excluded . Therefore, it can be broadly interpreted a public parking facility is will within the definition. It can certainly be