Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04/12/88
1 !"Life is like a ten -speed bike. Most of us have gears we never use." -Charles M. Schultz AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 12, 1988 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 6:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Etta Simpson MAYOR PRO TEM Jim Rosenberger COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Chuck Sheldon June Williams CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY James P. Lough All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATIONS: Fair Housing Month, April, 1988 Child Passenger Safety Week, May 1 - 8, 1988 Earthquake Preparedness Month, April, 1988 INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES: Alex Hernandez, Assistant Planner Yu Ying Ting, Clerk Typist, P1 ing Department RECOGNITION OF SPONSORS OF THE EASTER EGG HUNT: H.B. Jaycees; Scott Ingell of Scotty's Restaurant; Mary Stark of Sir Speedy; Hermosa Valley School. CITIZEN COMMENTS oil Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar or within the jurisdiction of the Council not elsewhere considered on the agenda may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the *item is called. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are request- ed to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by amember prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) Recommendation to approve minutes the City Council held on March 17, Recommendation to approve minutes the City Council held on March 21, Recommendation to approve minutes the City Council held on March 22, Recommendation to approve minutes the City Council held on March 29, Recommendation to approve Demands os. through (g) (h) (i) (j) of special meeting of 1988. of special meeting of 1988. of regular meeting of 1988. of special meeting of 1988. and Warrants inclusive. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative,-uture Agenda Items. Re oc mm ndation toeiv�eand file Monthl nvestment Report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated April 4, 1988. Recommendation to cancel Warrants Nos. 025319, 025361, 025844, 025900, 025918 and 025947. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated March 21, 1988. Recommendation to receive and file report of a vacancy created on the Cable TV Board and to not fill that vacancy. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated March 29, 1988. Recommendation to deny claim for damages and refer to City's Claims Administrator the claim of John Zertuche, 11115 Acame St., #2, No. Hollywood, CA 91602, filed arch 23, 1988. Recommendation to authorize call for bids for concrete street repairs (CIP 85-160). Memorandum from Publics Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 4, 1988. Recommendation to authorize call for bids for bicycle path repairs (CIP 85-165). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 4, 1988. Award of bid for first floor Police Department remodel (CIP 87-606). Memorandum from Public Works Director 5e Anthony Antich dated March 24, 1988. - 2 - Recommended Action: Award bid to Stuart Construction Co. at a cost not to exceed $148,962, authorize Mayor to sign, and authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limits. (n) Award of bid for asphalt street repairs (CIP 87-171). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 4, 1988. (o) (P) Recommended Action: Award bid to Vernon Paving, at a cost not to exceed $82,500, authorize Mayor to sign, and pit authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within xp,j1J4; budget limits. ^li Recommendation to approve Special Event Permit for addi- tional pro beach volleyball tournament. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated April 4, 1988. Recommendation to approve uniform signage policy for all Hermosa Beach parks per the guidelines submitted by the Community Resources Advisory Commission. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated March 31, 1988. (q) Recommendation to authorize installation of drinking fountain at Edith Rodaway Friendship Park and allocate funds for same. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated April 4, 1988. (r) Recommendation to include consideration of air con- ditioning for the Civic Theatre in the City's 1988-89 S budget. Memorandum from Community Resources Director �� Alana Mastrian dated April 5, 1988.1s / �/ (s) Recommendation to receive and file report on Civic The- E,1. ���. �� L etre usage for 88/89 budget deliberations. Memorandum �G7-/-,�7 l from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated `7/ `� April 7, 198 ./164:3; ....- :41 yr�4 *74 ********** MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING: After the City Clerk has read the title to any resolution or or- dinance on tonight's agenda, the further reading thereof be waived, reserving and guaranteeing to each Councilmember the right to demand the reading of any such resolution or ordinance in regular order. ***************************************************************** 2. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a) ORDINANCE NO. 88-920 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO THE DEFINITION, LOCATION AND COM- PUTATION OF OPEN SPACE AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARA- TION. For waiver of further reading and adoption. 3 (b) ORDINANCE NO. 88-922 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 2-2.16, ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL. For waiver of further reading and adoption. (C) A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #18835 FOR A 2 -UN CONDOMINIUM AT 1026 SUNSET DRIVE. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated April 4, 1988. (d) A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP418813FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 1134 SUNSET DRIVE. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated April 4, 1988. (e) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 5-24.5 "WHEELED VEHICLES, OR DEVICES ON STRAND", SECTION (a)3 BY ADDING THE WORD QUADRICYCLE. For waiver of full reading and introduc- / tion. Memorandum from General Services D', ector Joan Noon dated April 1, 1988. (f) A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROPOSED LEGISLATION FOR CON- GRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION TO LINE PORTIONS OF THE ALL AMERICAN CANAL AND THE COACHELLA BRANCH. For adoption. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Nort► r,1ft March 31, 1988. , �{J& ���'� 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC.— PUBLIC HEARINGS TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION NOT TO MERGE LOTS LOCATED AT 1137 NINTH STREET AND 1276 NINTH STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 4, 1988. L ,� ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 29.5, ARTICLE IV, MERGER OF PARCELS. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated March 21, 1988. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. REPORT REGARDING REQUEST OF M CHAEL LAWTON FOR EXEMPTION FROM STANDARDS FOR PROJECT LOCATED AT 1840 HERMOSA AVENUE. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated April 4, 1988. o 8. .II REVIEW OF U.U.T. EXPENDITURES/REVENUES. Memorandum from Assistant fit anager Al na Mastrianld.te. Ap/'1 5 1988 ( C4RONSIDERAT'ON OF SOLUTIONS TO FrROTE€L I0 NEEDS CON- FRONTED WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION. Memorandum from City "c Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated April 7, 1988. • 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Consideration of design review process for new construc- tion. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated March 30, 1988. (b) c) 11. (a) Proposed policy for length of City Council meeting Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. orthcraft d 1988. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS CITY COUNCIL Request by Councilmember Williams for discussion of pro- posed SCAG transportation study. (Oral r -•or (b) List of committees that require n,- icin•of their meet ings. Memorandum from City Attorney dated April 5, 1988. (c) (d) (e) Appointment of one Councilmember to be the City's rep- resentati(ve to the Los Angeles County West Mosquito Abatement District. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated April 6, 1988. Planning Commission Expiration of Terms. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated April 6, 1988. Consideration of ballot measures for November, 1988. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated April 7, 1988. 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Councilmember Sheldon for discussio► of bea maintenanc- with�-em+ha - ',- on g affi i/, CO5L- " i r .4., -, / r�• RecoHnended Acti1) t- b fncil whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back 1 1 / on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- J cil action tonight. // (b) Request by Mayor Simpson for discussion re. prioritizing consideration by Planning Commission of SPA Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whethe to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. • 13. NEETING .OF THE HERMOSA BEACH VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT COMMISSION. (a) Recommendation to ap rove minutes of the March 8, 1988 meeting. Z -A--0 rf, (b) Status report regarding the pros and cons of eliminating the Vehicle Parking District. Memorandum from Parking Administrator Joan Noon dated April 4, 1988. , (c) Request for authorization to open second Local Agency Investment Fund account. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated April 6, 1988. ADJOURNMENT 6 NEW CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 30, 1987: MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS - Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA,'BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded. full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown -parking -lots Ind otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business district. • 1 3;1 Y e ‹,,e6e-e4/- Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council April 1, 1988 City Council Meeting of April 12, 1988 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5-24.5 " WHEELED VEHICLES OR DEVICES ON STRAND " PARAGRAPH (a), SECTION 3, BY ADDING THE WORD QUADRICYCLE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance. Background: We have been approached by a party interested in leasing the city owned lot at 74 14th Street (behind the 7-11 store). The lot would be used to rent pedal powered quadricycles. The interest in our particular location, is the close proximity to the Strand. Currently only bicycles and tricycles, not exceeding 36", are allowed on the Strand. The proposed four (4) wheeled vehicles do not exceed 36" in width. Prior to considering the negotiation of a lease on our property, we wanted to make sure the prospective lessee would be able to conduct the type of business he intends. He is scheduled to go before the Planning Commission on May 17th, for a Conditional Use Permit to conduct business outside of a building, pursuant to Section 8-5 of the Municipal Code, and to have outdoor storage. If he is successful, the only hinderance to his project, would be the existing ordinance. There is no prohibition of operating this type of vehicle on the city streets. Analysis: We have attached a photograph of the quadricycle for your review. We recognize there is a current problem of congestion on the Strand however, this is not a fast moving vehicle and is aesthetically pleasing. It is something that could enhance the attraction to Hermosa Beach, at no cost to the City. Also, the project does provide potential revenue from lease payments, business license fees, etc. General Services Director Concur: --era" Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager • 2e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 5, OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, "BEACH, BOATS AND MUNICIPAL PIER", ARTICLE I, SECTION 5-24.5 (a), TO ADD THE WORD QUADRICYCLE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Chapter 5, "Beach, Boats and Municipal Pier", of the Hermosa Beach City Code shall be and hereby is amended as follows, by adding the word Quadricycle to Section 5-24.5 (a): Chapter 5 BEACH, BOATS AND MUNICIPAL PIER Article I. Beach and Strand, §§ 5-1 -- 5-35 Sec. 5-24.5. Wheeled vehicles or devices on Strand Walkway. (a) Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to ride or operate any wagon, box on wheels, or any other method of riding or locomotion on wheels on any portion of the Strand walkway; except the following: (1) roller skates; (2) skateboards; (3) pedal -powered, nonmotorized bicycles, tricycles or quadricycles with a width of not more than thirty-six (36) inches used for recreational purposes; (4) conveyances for persons unable to walk. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK , CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: APPROVED /// /// E !F HE I E 0 T, ITT 'UNC. of the City of ermosa Beach, Cali ornia, e • on uesday, Marc 29, 1988 at the hour of 6:05 P.M. RQLL._ BALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Absent: None Also Present: City Manager Northcraft, City Attorney Lough, Finance Administrator Copeland, City Clerk Midstokke, and various Department Heads. pis4ussipA o�� statps: of...apprai�al 9f . �1T�S� Right-pf-Way City Manager Northcraft gave a report on the status of the appraisal with the firm under contract, Hamilton Jones. Staff recommended proceeding with the current firm. After certain information is provided, the appraisal is expected to be ready in 60 days. Councilmember Sheldon would like the bills of Kane, Ballmer, and Berkman reviewed as to any monies billed regarding the appraisal. emposed_4ett9n: To adjourn to a Closed Session to discuss this matter. Motion Creighton, dies for lack of second. ctLpg: To authorize the City Manager to contract with a firm of is choice for a site review of the property, not to exceed $3,000. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. $uSIBet,previe ,W9rkshpp. Memorandum from City Manager Northcraft dated March 24, 1988. City Council Goals for 1987 dated 3-28-88. The City Manager presented a brief overview of ideas and explanations regarding the budget. Each Councilmember then gave their input and a summary of these items is attached as Exhibit "A" to these minutes. To put on a future City Council agenda the creation of a es gn Review Board. Motion Williams, second Sheldon. So ordered. IDJQUNNMENT The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned at 7:45 P.M. to a Adjourned Meeting on Thursday, April 7, 1988 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. for the purpose of having a workshop with the Planning Commission. City Clerk Minutes 3-29-88 ld MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL FOR PURPOSES OF A STUDY SE88ION 7:30 P.M., MARCH 17, 1988 Meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. Representatives of the Circulation Element update consultant, DRS Associates, presented and discussed the draft Circulation Element objectives and implementation policies. Also distributed were the current objectives and policies of the existing Circulation Element which was prepared in 1979. Discus- sion points included the following: - It was suggested that helpful information would be a compari- son of traffic volumes and their changes from 1979 to the 1987 statistics. In terms of prioritizing the four main goals of the update, it was suggested that reduc single passenger vehicles and preserving the residentia -re perhaps higher priorities than parking and major transportation improvements. Consideration of changes in directional signage and analysis of problems associated with the east/west connections across the railroad right-of-way were acceptable. - It was noted that the size and difficulty of proposed solu- tions should match the size and difficulty of existing or anticipated problems. - It was noted that, regarding parking, concern should be to meet the existing demand rather than to provide for creation of a demand. - It was noted that, rather than a suggested 2,500 ADT (Average Daily Traffic) goal for residential streets, that a more restrictive goal might be 1500 ADT. The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. la MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, March 22, 1988 at the hour of 7:35 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - 6:30 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54856.9(A) for the purpose of discussing potential litigation and potential purchase of the A.T.&S.F. Railroad right-of-way. ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Absent: None FLAG CEREMONY BY CAMP FIRE TROOP 'HAPPY BIRDS' ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson PROCLAMATIONS: Camp Fire Birthday Week, March 13 - 20, 1988 - accepted by Janice Streeter, Leader of Happy Birds Camp Fire Troop National Library Week, April 17 - 23, 1988 - accepted by Ron Schneider, Librarian at Hermosa Beach Library ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED SESSION None ANNOUNCEMENTS Beach Cities Symphony will perform March 25, 1988 at El Camino College Auditorium South Bay Chamber Orchestra will perform a Classical Music Concert on April 15, 1988 at the Community Center Theater Jerry Davis, District Manager of Southern California Gas Company, introduced himself to the new Councilmembers CITIZEN COMMENTS Michael Lawton, 1840 Hermosa Avenue, regarding Ordinance No. 88-917 - asked for lifting of moratorium and presented letter dated March 20, 1988 - Mayor Simpson asked staff to work with Mr. Lawton, the City Manager to return with a report at the next City Council meeting, April 12, 1988. Dennis Clelland, 434 - 28th Street, regarding cost of upgrading fire hydrants and flow. Shirley Cassell, 611 Monterey, regarding trailer parked at Hermosa Mini Storage - City Manager Northcraft to contact Ms. Cassell on Wednesday, March 23. 1 Minutes 3-22-88 Linda Gile, Ocean Drive, Manhattan Beach/1522/24/3O Loma Drive, re fire hydrant charge of $70,000 due to new construction. Paul Engel, 927 - 6th Street, re charge for fire hydrants. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR on- To approve Consent Calendar items (a) through s with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clari- ty: (h) Rosenberger, (1) Williams, (m) Sheldon, (o) Sheldon, (q) Williams, and (r) Sheldon. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (a) $ecommendation to approve__minutes of special meeting of the City Council held on March 7, 1988. (b) Action: To approve minutes. $ecommendation,to_approve_minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on March 8, 1988. Actions To approve minutes. (0) Recommendatiof.to.approve.Demands and Warrants Action: To approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 25707 and 25 22 through 25983 inclusive noting voided Warrants Nos. 25826 through 25829 inclusive. (d) Recommendation to receive and file_Tentative Future Agenda Items. Action; To receive and file. (e) Recommendatipn,to receive and filethes.Monthly_Financial Reports for February,_ 1988. 1) Expenditure Report 2) Revenue Report 3) Treasurer's Report Action.; To receive and file Monthly Financial Reports for February, 1988. (f) Claims for.Damages - Recommendation to deny claims_and refer to,Cit ' Claims Administrator. 1 John Dwayne Rickett, 36214E. Pacific Coast Hwy, Long Beach, 90804, filed March 14, 1988. 2) David K. Kaplan, 412 Hermosa Ave., #6, Hermosa Beach, filed March 16, 1988. Action; To deny claims and refer to the City's Claims Administrator. - 2 mlb P'• Minutes 3-22-88 ir (g) Recommendation to_ receive.. and file report on..California ttunicipal,Treasurer!. Association Educational Workshop. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated March 14, 1988. Action: To receive and file. (h) Recommendation to_receive, and, file two,_month ,evaluation of alternative, hours of, operation . for,. City JIall.. Qpera- tions. Memorandum from Personnel -Director Robert Black- wood dated March 15, 1988. Act on: To amend City Hall operation procedure to in- clude telephone answering coverage from 7-8 A.M., 12-1 Noon, and 5-6 P.M., Monday through Thursday. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. So ordered. (i) Recommendation tQ authorize Mayor_to sign amendment to revise the,, termination clause in the,.. DTPA operational _agreement . with_ . the_C,tyf _ Redondo _Beach. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated March 16, 1988. Action; To authorize the Mayor to execute the amendment to the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) operational agreement with the City of Redondo Beach to reflect the updated termination clause requirements issued by the Department of Labor. (j) Recommendation toapprove_revisedagreement with...the firm of _ Liebert, , Cassidy &,Frierson. to . conduct, training an_consultation services, and. authorize_ City Manager.to sign. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Black- wood dated March 16, 1988. Acti n; To authorize the City Manager to execute the revised. agreement with the firm of Lierbert, Cassidy & Frierson to conduct training and consultation services, the contract to commence February 15, 1988 rather than the original date of January 1, 1988. (k) Reeommepdati9nto,extend_for 30 days. the,temporary_ap- pointment of Actin g.Police_RecQrds Administrator. Memo- randum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated March 16, 1988. Action; To extend for 30 days the temporary appointment of Gayle Brown as Acting Police Records Administrator, said extension to commence March 25, 1988. (1) To approve,,staff and_Commenity Resources,Advisory_.Com- missionrecommendations,in_name of,new,park located_at Uollowell and Prospect 4venuestith."Prospect Heights Friendship_ Park". Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated March 14, 1988. - 3 - Minutes 3-22-88 Action To name the new park located at Hollowell and Prospect Avenues the "Edith Rodaway Friendship Park"; direct the Parks Division of the Public Works Department to have a sign made for the park at a cost not to exceed $300; appropriate $150 from Prospective Expenditures into the Parks Department, the additional $150 to be solicited from neighbors by Councilmember Creighton; and direct the Department of Community Resources to arrange for dedication ceremonies for the official opening and naming of the park. - Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. (m) ReeommendatiQn to. authorize„solicitation of bids for electrical improvements„at_Cijty.Hall (CIP, 6-602)x_and issue addenda„as necessary. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March 14, 1988. Action: To authorize staff to advertise for bids for the electrical improvements for the City Hall (CIP 86-602) deleting the new uninterruptable power supply (U.P.S.) for City Hall computer room, and issue addenda as necessary. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. So ordered. (n) RecommendatiQn_to amend„the leaseagreement,between.the Citylof Hermosa_Beach andHope Cha pe�.._tohav have the lease commenoe,March lst. Memorandum from Commun ty Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated March 10, 1988. (0) Action: To amend the lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Hope Chapel to have the lease com- mence March 1, 1988. Recommendation to a.krov revised b d;etfor S Munici al Election June 1 and authorize ecial 5200 to be transferred_,rom Rrospeetiye.Egpenditures into_City Clerk Election Account. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated March 15, 1988. Action; Staff to write a letter, over the appropriate signatures, to the Los Angeles County Registrar Recorder requesting information regarding the formula used to establish charges for election consolidation for the June 7, 1988 Special Election. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Final_Actiorn}. To adopt the revised budget for the Spe- cial Municipal Election June 7, 1988 and authorize that an additional $5,200 be transferred from Prospective Expenditures into the Elections Account for the esti- mated cost of the Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder for the consolidation (for a total of $11,700). Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered noting the objection of Williams. - 4 - Minutes 3-22-88 (p) Recommendation to receive and file re ort on :radin: and drainage or entative Tract 1309:•, located_ at 20th and POwer,.Streets. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March 14, 1988. Action: To receive and file the report. (q) Recommendation to�receive and,file Biltmore„Site_ap- praisal,.update. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Alana Mastrian dated March 17, 1988. Proposed.Actignl To direct the City Manager to proceed with the appraisal of the Biltmore site for use as R-1, R-3, Commercial and the 1985 Hotel Specific Plan. Motion Williams, second Mayor Simpson. Mayor Simpson subsequently withdrew her second. Action; To direct the City Manager to put out for bid the appraisal of the Biltmore site for R-1, R-2, R-3, Commercial and 1985 Hotel Specific Plan. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None (r) Approval of,authorization to,utilize services of.Art Nazirow to.represept City, in Railway, right-of-way dis- cussions. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. North - craft dated March 17, 1988. Action. To accept the offer of Attorney Art Mazirow to provide volunteer assistance as the City's spokesperson in discussions with the AT&SF Railway Company regarding City acquisition of the surplus right of way in a manner and form that is beneficial to the City. Motion Sheldon, second Simpson. So ordered. (s) Recommendatipnto.receive,and file' the Child„Abuse Montbly_geporta. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated March 15, 1988. Action: To receive and file report. A recess was called at 11:30 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 11:40 P.M. NOTION TO-WAIVE_.FURTHEN_READING: cti n: To waive full reading of any ordinance or resolution on this evening's agenda. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None - 5 - Minutes 3-22-88 2. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTION (a) ORDINANCE_NO,L 88-92Q - AN.QRDINANCE.AMENDING THE_EONING ORPINANCE_IN REGARD TO, THE,DEFINITION, LOCATION ANQ„COM- PUTATION, QF, OPEN SPACE.AND_,ADOPTING _A NEGATIVE..DECLARA- TION. For adoption. Actjof: To reintroduce Ordinance No. 88-920 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN -REGARD TO THE DEFINI- TION, LOCATION AND COMPUTATION OF OPEN SPACE AND ADOPT- ING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION" with changes. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. (b) ORDINANCE 00._807921 -,AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING_A TEXT AMENDMENT_ESTAB ISHING JENALITIES_FOR,CONDITIONAL,USE PERMIT VIOLATIONS. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-921 entitled "AN OR- DINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPT- ING A TEXT AMENDMENT ESTABLISHING PENALTIES FOR CONDI- TIONAL USE PERMIT VIOLATIONS." Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. (o) AN._ ORDINANCE. AMENDING,. CITE[. CODE,, SECTION, 2-2.1,6, , ADDRESS- ING THE,CQuNCIL. For introduction. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated March 15, 1988. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 88-922 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 2.2.16, ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL." Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. AotQn To suspend the agenda and go to item 5, Public Hearings. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. 3. ITEMS„ REMOVED_FROM THE. CONSENT,_CAI:ENDAR FOB -SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Consent Calendar items (h), (1), (m), (o), (1), (q) and (r) were discussed at this time but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM, THE PUU$LIC. (a) Letter from John and _Jan McHu_h 8 -.1st P ace He mo- re. interest in purchas- ing city -owned property at 705 - 1st St. and 704 - 1st P1. Action: Refer to City Manager for response to cor- respondents, and a report to be returned to the City Council to include the current zoning and potential uses of this city -owned property. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. - 6 - Minutes 3-22-88 (b) Letter from Bruce and. Nancy BeMille, 1242 ,-_.9th,yStreet, He? mos? _$each, , dated -.March _9 19$A re. merger of lot. Ae_ toa: Refer to Planning Department for response to correspondents. Motion Rosenberger, second Mayor Simpson. So ordered. (e) Letter, from William (.._and _Helen L, . Peters,. 1 60;_Sgventh Stregt, _119roposa Beach, _ dated ,February. 29,..198 re. reconsideration of merger of lots, with attached memo- randum from Planning Department dated March 15, 1988. iletion: Refer to Planning Department for response to correspondents, and the Planning Department to revise the letter notifying property owners of the proposed lot mergers clarifyig the fact that a site survey is not a requirement to appeal lot mergers. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. PUBLIC_HEARINGS 5. APPEAL .OF PLANNING , COMMISSION'S DECISI0t1 NQT .TO , MgRQE EOMs , ATM 1220. _— . 7TH , STRFET, ,,,1152 , 7TH . STREET,. _.AND. 1 a 54 8TfI STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 15, 1988. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. The Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak in favor of granting the appeal were: Jane Allison, 620 - 24th Place George Sehmeltzer, 505 - 24th Place Bob Fleck, 620 - 24th Place Speaking in opposition to granting the appeal were: Jack Wood, 200 Pier Avenue, representing Mr. & Mrs. Patrick Vignery Wilma Burt, 1152 - 7th Street Ken Peters, 1160 - 7th Street Blair Smith, 316 - 25th Street The Hearing was closed. Action; To grant the appeal and adopt Resolution No. 56-5122 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON AP- PEAL THE MERGER OF LOTS COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1220 7TH STREET, 1152 7TH STREET AND 1154 8TH STREET." Motion Sheldon, second Creighton AYES - Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - Creighton A recess was called at 9:40 P.M. 7 Minutes 3-22-88 The meeting reconvened at 9:50 P.M. 6. APPEAL OF DENIAL OF A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE 17' PARKING SETBACK AT 905 - 15TH PLACE. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 14, 1988. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Fleet Nuttall, appellant, 905 - Jeff Green, 846 - 16th Street - Jerry Compton, 822 - 7th Street Commission position Alecia Green, 846 - 16th Street The Public Hearing was closed. 15th Place in opposition - explained Planning = in opposition Action: To deny the appeal and adopt Resolution No. 88- 5123 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ON APPEAL A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE REQUIRED SEVENTEEN FOOT PARKING SETBACK AT 905 15TH PLACE." Motion Sheldon, second Creighton AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. RECOMMENDATION ON HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated March 14, 1988. The staff report was presented by Building and Safety Director William Grove. Administrative Aide Janice Silver was commended by Coun- cilmember Williams for an excellent report. Action: To direct staff to continue working with the County Hazardous Waste representative, with possible enlargement and enhanced educational opportunities, and return to Council when they deem it appropriate for a member of the Council to participate. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. 8. RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT 1986-87 FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND AUDITOR'S REPORT AND STAFF RESPONSES TO MANAGEMENT LET- TER RECOMMENDATIONS. Memorandum from Finance Administra- tor Viki Copeland dated March 16, 1988. Minutes 3-22-88 Speaking to Council was Leif Strom, Grant Thorton, 18300 Von Karmen, Suite 110, Irvine, CA, City Auditor, ex- plaining their report. Action: To accept the staff recommendations relating to the 1986-87 Report on Internal Accounting Control sub- mitted by the City's independent auditor, Grant Thorn- ton, as outlined in Finance Administrator Viki Cope - land's memo dated March 16, 1988.._ Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 9. APPROVAL OF BUDGET CALENDAR AND REVISED CAPITAL IMPROVE- MENT PROGRAM FORMAT. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Alana Mastrian dated March 17, 1988. Supplemen- tal information - Revised Budget Prepration Calendar. Proposed Action: To have the City Manager determine the best date for Council to meet for a pre -budget meeting. Motion Creighton - withdrawn Proposed Action: To have a pre -budget session as soon as possible with appropriate department heads and the City Manager for the purpose of establishing Council's goals for each department. Motion Sheldon, second Mayor Simpson - withdrawn Action: To schedule a workshop session on the budget and Council goals for Tuesday, March 29, 1988 from 6:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M., department heads to attend if they so desire. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Final Action: To approve the budget preparation schedule for the 1988-89 fiscal year including prepara- tion of a revised five year Capital Improvement Program, with an amendment to include the workshop session to be held on Tuesday, March 29 from 6:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. Motion Sheldon, second Mayor Simpson. So ordered. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Gotanda/City of Hermosa Beach City Manager Northcraft reported that the Gotanda property is moving along and that all principals involved in the sale of the property at the south- west corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Gould have agreed to hold an auction of the property on Thursday, April 28, 1988 with a minimum bid of $1.7 million. Anderson -Ryan Realty is being used as the broker and any interested parties are advised to contact Betty Ryan at Anderson -Ryan in Hermosa Beach. 9 Minutes 3-22-88 (b) Potential Ballot Issue City Manager Northcraft announced having discussed wity Councilmember Creighton a potential ballot issue. Councilmember Creighton suggested that it would be beneficial to the community, electorate and staff to study the initiative petition to re- zone the Biltmore site to R-1, highest value at time of sale. He suggested that Councilmembers obtain copies of the proposed initiative petition and requested their input. City Manager Northcraft will have this brought back at the next Council meeting for discussion. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Report to City Council regarding the possibility of a parking structure at 14th and Manhattan Avenue. Memo- randum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March 9, 1988. Action: To receive and file report. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. (b) Report from Mayor Simpson re. City's adoption of a Moun- tain Lion. Action: To receive and file with the clear understand- ing that Mayor Simpson will be responsible for any fund- ing requests. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. So ordered. (c) Status report re. railroad right-of-way. (Reserved on agenda is case there is new information to report). None. 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL None. ADJOURNMENT The City Council of the City of Hermosa journed on Wednesday, March 23, 1988 at a Budget Workshop Session to be held on at the hour of 6:00 P.M. Beach, California, ad - the hour of 12:20 A.M. to Tuesday, March 29, 1988 - 10 - Minutes 3-22-88 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Monday, March 21, 1988 at the hour of 6:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon (arrived at 6:50 P.M.), Williams, Mayor Simpson Absent: None Adjournment to Closed Session The meeting adjourned to a Closed Session at the hour of 6:35 P.M. to discuss potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 and to discuss the purchase of real property commonly known as the A.T.&S.F. Railroad right-of-way. Meeting Reconvened The meeting reconvened at the hour of 8:15 P.M. Actions from Closed Session City Attorney Lough announced no actions were taken in Closed Session. ADJOURNMENT The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Monday, March 21, 1988 at the hour of 8:19 P.M. to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, March 22, 1988 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. preceded by a Closed Executive Session at 6:30 P.M. Deputy City Clerk 1b April 5, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of April 12, 1988 INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES The following individuals are presented to the City Council for introduction: Alex Hernandez, Assistant Planner. Mr. Hernandez was appointed as Assistant Planner on October 26, 1987. Prior to his appointment, Alex was employed by the City of Los Alamitos as a Planning Intern. His duties at Los Alamitos included development and implementation of new policies in Code Enforcement, Community Development and Emergency Preparedness. Alex has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science with an emphasis on Public Administration from California State Universi- ty, Long Beach. He is currently continuing his education at Cal- ifornia State University, Long Beach where he is working on his Master's Degree in Public Administration. Alex's duties for this city will include enforcement of Zoning Code Regulations and provisions of Conditional Use Permits (C.U.P.). Yu -Yang Ting, Planning Department Clerk Typist. Ms. Ting was appointed as a Clerk Typist in the Planning Depart- ment on November 11, 1987. Prior to her appointment, Yu-Ying was a Customer Services Agent for Singapore Airlines in Taiwan. Yu-Ying has a Bachelor of Arts degree from Fu Jen University in Taipei, Taiwan where she majored in German and has also completed courses in computer programing at National Taiwan University in Taipei, Taiwan. Yu-Ying's duties in the Planning Department include providing clerical support to the professional staff as well as preparing City Council and Planning Commission agenda materials for distribution. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Noted: Kevin North raft City Manger Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council April 7, 1988 City Council Meeting of April 12, 1988 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Responsible Agent April 26, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Activity Reports Monthly Expenditure Report - March Monthly Revenue Report - March City Treasurer's Report - March Stats of cro hment Permits P opo sedd r. xtension of agree- ment with Executive Suite for ekeepincq services /1 Report And recommendation re. pro- cedures for handling assets which are seized and forfeited by Police Department Safe Cpnduct of Pursuits Policy .ge General Plan and Zone Change Area #2 Municipal Matters ; t�T : tract tension Ann : -- _ lak ee ent 1 iazardou' Materials Ordinance Receiptof Fidelity Bonds and ordi- nance .-+ amendment to revise amounts Proposed amendment jo signinance changing violations from misdemeanors to infractions in order to improve ,- enforcemen capa • s • Department Heads Finance Administrator Finance Administrator City Treasurer Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Safety Director Public Safety Director Planning Director Public Safety Director City Attorney Public Safety Director Personnel Director Building Director if May 10, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Investment Report Agreement for inspection & admin- istration for Traffic Signal Improvements CIP 85-138 May 23, 1988, 6:00 p.m. 1st Budget & CIP program study session with City Council May 24, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Activity Reports Monthly Expenditure Report - April Monthly Revenue Report - April City Treasurer's Report - April Public Hearing General Plan and Zone Change Area #9 May 26, 1988, 6:00 p.m. 2nd Budget & CIP Program study session June 14, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Investment Report Public Hearing General Plan and Zone Change Area #7 1988-89 Budget and CIP Program City Treasurer Public Works Director City Mgr./Asst. City Mgr. Fin. Adm./Pub. Wks. Dir. Department Heads Finance Administrator Finance Administrator City Treasurer Planning Director City Mgr./Asst. City Mgr. Fin. Adm./Pub. Wks. Dir. City Treasurer Planning Director City Manager ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Report on problems with campaign contribution ordinance. City Clerk Recreational Vehicle ordinance General Services Director Reduction of rotation of Council liaison assignments Development of design standards and criteria by which to review projects for EIRS Acceptance of work and final estimate for replacement of sani- tary sewers Target Area I (J&J). Results of SCAG Santa Monica Bay Pollution Symposium Report on results of noise ordi- nance study Ant form Fire Code Fire Sprinkler Ordinance o co t is for pr ssion each lle all ou nts Ordinance amending provision against selling gasoline and alcohol at same location City Clerk Planning Director Public Works Director Planning Director Public Safety Director Public Safety Director Public Safety Director City Attorney ***************************************************************** AGENDA 4/8 DRAFT REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 26, 1988 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Etta Simpson MAYOR PRO TEM Jim Rosenberger COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Chuck Sheldon June Williams Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY James P. Lough All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATIONS: INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES: Brian Gengler, Asst. Engineer Public Works Department Ursula Manson-Yelete, Clerk Typist Public Works Department CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar or within the jurisdiction of the Council not elsewhere considered on the agenda may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are request- ed to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on April 12, 1988. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the monthly financial reports for March, 1988. 1) Expenditure Report 2) Revenue Report 3) Treasurer's Report (e) (f) Proposed 3 -year extension of agreement with Executive Suite for housekeeping services. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated Recommended Action: Report and recommendation re. procedures for handling assets which are seized and forfeited by Police Depart- ment. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wis- niewski dated Recommended Action: (g) j Safe conduct of pursuits policy. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated ,i%'e Recommended Action: (h) Status of Encroachment Permits. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated Recommended Action: (i) Proposition A Subregional Incentive Fund application for Dial -A -Ride. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated Recommended Action: ***************************************************************** MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING: After the City Clerk has read the title to any resolution or or- dinance on tonight's agenda, the further reading thereof be waived, reserving and guaranteeing to each Councilmember the right to demand the reading of any such resolution or ordinance in regular order. ***************************************************************** 2. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. ZONE CHANGE OF AREA 2. Memorandum fx- Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated _SA41,0N1/P1- . 6. TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING PROJECTIONS INTO RE UIRED YARD AREAS. Memorandum from Planning, Direct or Michael Schubach dated 7. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO NOT MERGE LOTS LOCATED AT 1214 - 10TH STREET AND 1233 - 21ST STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8 OF/BIL ORE SITE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. Memorandum /Y(//W.from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated 9. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE CHANGING VIOLATIONS FROM MISDEMEANORS TO INFRACTIONS IN ORDER TO IMPROVE ENFORCEMENT CAPABILITIES. 10. DISCONTINUANCE OF THE HERMOSA COMMUTER BUS AND 3Q -DAY CONTRACT EXTENSION. Memorandum from Planing D}rector Michael Schuba, ted 11. RCC CONTRACT E NSION. MemoYandum fro VPublic Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated 12. ANNUAL REVIEW OF VASEK POLAK AGREEMENT. Memorandum from City Attor ey J- e P. Lough dated i 13. HAZARDOUS MATE IALS ORDINANCE. Memorandum from Public Safety Diiector Steve Wisniewski dated 14. RECEIPT OFA FIDITY BONDS AND ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO REVIEW AMOUNTS. Memorandum from Personnel Director Rob- ert Blackwood dated 00. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 00. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL 00. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. ADJOURNMENT FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 • .r • /11 19 1 Iw 1 69 9, 97 ''w 1 191 HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0001 FOR 04/12/88 DATE 04/07/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * DATE INVC ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ * TRN * AMOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO N CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY - - - --REMPEfiw _ TREAS H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS ---- REIMS -PETTY CASM/3-!/23 H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS REIMS PETTY CASH/31 /23 H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS ---- REM -PETTY CASH/31 /23 H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS REIMS -PETTY CASH/3-1/83 H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS REIMS-PETTY-CASH/31 /23 02220 001-400-1101-4305 00166 66 02220 001-400-1122-4201 00148 u3/24188 ECtCTIONS 02220 001-400-1141-4316 00024 411.70 05093 --$0.00 25988 jo 04707788 - 411.00 05093 25988 :: /CONTKACT 8tKVICE7PRIVAT-- -- -"---- -40.00 - 04707/86 6 429.19 05093 25988 $0:00 04/07/88— . /88 CITY TREASURER 1TRAaNING 02220 001-400-1201-4305 00086 $13.79 CITY AMAGER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES. 02220 001-400-1202-4316 00186 OS/c. TNANCE NORIA /TRAINI $17.04 02220 001-400-1203-4201 00292 412.61 (CunrIAt.i rstKvat.E,PKaVAT H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS -REIMS-PET H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS - REIP*8 PETTY CASM/3-1/s H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY REIMS PETTY CASM/31/23 TREAS PtRbLJI NtL 02220 001-400-1203-4305 00143 $0.34 OPER bUPP►.IES 02220 001-400-1207-4305 00113 420.00 03/247@@ BUS LICENSE ,urrICE OPEN SUPPLIES 02220 001-400-1208-4305 00466 03/24788 GEN APPROP 02220 001-400-2101-4305 00658 03/24/88 POLICE 02220 001-400-2101-4309 00131 05093 25988 40:00- 04/07188 • 05093 25988 -*0: 00 - -.04/07788 05093 25988 410.00 -- 04/07/88 05093 25988 40700-04107/88 05093 25988 • • • • • • E5 l� • 86 -10700 04107786 41 Q 41.27CR 05093 25988 44 /OFFICE OPER SvrPLIES- $0:00-" -- 134/07/88 $49.16 05093 ,OrF1%6C 'OPER-BJPPCIES 40.-00 -. H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS RE PIS- PETTY CA•V3-1/23 H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS 02220 001-400-2101-4316 00201 03/24/88 POLICE 02220 001-400-2101-4316 00202 86 25988 04707/88 •* ,11 45.33 05093 25988 1, INTEP ANCE MATERIALS-- - - 40.00 04/07/88- •, $64.69 /TRAINING- $62.10 03/24/88 POLICE /TRAINING 02220 001-400-2201-4305 00170 02220 001-400-4202-4305 00269 423.96 8 40.37 "bur Lat. 05093 25988 -. *0.00 04/07788 - 05093 25988 -*0.00 04107188----- 05093 25988 -*0: 00-04707186 05093 25988 *u. D0- X707768 N 16 6.1 61 62 61 6. 61 66 6l 68 69 /8 11 1t 11 !1 19 !6 • • • • • • • • • 11 IS :7 7f 71 211 M 17 77 u n 1, .0 ., ., 44 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 14:30:39 tt,t OF HEtN08A BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION H w ,1 ,7 71 H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS REIMS PETTY CA8M/3-1/23 H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS -REIMS PETTY GASH/3-1/t3 H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS REIMS-PETTY-CA8M/3-1/23 H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY -REfMB-PETTY GASH/3-1123 PAGE 0002 DATE 04/07/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 02220 001-400-4204-4309 00882 $12.95 03/24/88 BLDG rMAINT 7MAINIENANCE-MATERtALS- 02220 001-400-4601-4305 00487 03/24/88 $17.93 CORN RESOuRt.tb 'Orr ICE OPER SUPPLIES 02220 001-400-4601-4319 00214 03724188 $54.49 Gunn RE80uett.tb 'urt..2AL EVENTS-___ .. TREAS 02220 001-400-6101-4309 00463 H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS REiMB- PETT1r • DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY REIMS-10ETTV GABM/3-1123 TREAS —03124/88 PARKS 02220 110-400-3302-4305 00396 $30.00 /nAINTENArGt MATERIALS $24.28 /24/88 PARKING ENF /OFFIt.E OPER SUPPLIES - 02220 110-400-3302-4316 00105 H DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS $23.31 PARKING ENF 'itIAININQ 02220 115-400-3104-4309 00515 03/24/88 524. 00 TRAFFIC. SAFti'V /rA1n,EuArvt.t MATERIALS -- -- *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************************+H►******* $506.97 H DOROTHY*HATANO - - - - - HOTEL»AIt TRNO 01420 001-400-2101-4313 00132 $230.00 POLICE-7TRAVEC EXPENSE.- -STC- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT ODUM TERMINATION PAVOPP $230.00 00243 001-202-0000-2030 00192 $6.487.08 03/24/88 7ACCRUED PAYROLL *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $6.487.08 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. - .. RE?!REMENT/PES 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00194 $76.395.33 RETIREMENT 'RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00195 $77. 250. 22CR H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 8Y8. a 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00068 -RETIREMENT/FEB-88- -- - 03123'88- $872. 73 LIGHTING /RETIREMENT 05093 25988 -- 40.00 04/07/88 05093 25988 $0.00 04/07/88 05093 25988 - $0.00 04/07/88 05093 25988 $0.00 04/07/88 05093 25988 "" -$0.00 04/07/88 05093 25988 30.-00 "04/07/88 05093 25988 30:00 04/07/88 05601 25989 $0.00 04/07/88 25983 $0.00 04/07/88 25984 $0.00 04/06/88 23984 $0.00 04/06/88 25984 30.00 04/06/88 e 177 71 7. 7, 22 7, 7. r 7. .42 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0003 DATE 04/07/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. -RETIREMENT/FEB 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. ---------RETIREMENT/FEB 88 00026 3 110-400-3301-4180 00068 *226. 44 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00068 *4, 466. 58 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 8Y8. RETIREMENT/FEB-88 00026 115-400-3101-4180 00041 00026 115-400-3104-4180 00041 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. REItREMENT/FEB 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/FEB 88 00026 -03/23/ H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. R H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 8Y8. —RETI KG 1 1Kt1'ItN 1 *912. 54 ETIREMENT *657. 01 /RETIREMENT 145-400-3401-4180 00041 *110.79 /RETIREMENT 00026 145-400-3402-4180 00041 *132.33 03/43/88 E88w /RETIREMENT 00026 0 145-400-3407-4180 00008 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00041 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. -RETIREMENT/REB 88 K06$iN 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00068 *36. 07 RETIREMENT *92. 01 FRt) MG�'ItN 1 *860. 65 1 1KGFItNI *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************************************e** *7.512.26 H SELF INSURERS SERVICE. INC. 00824 - REIMS JAN 88-tIAB-EXP----32314- - -03).24 H SELF INSURERS SERVICE, INC. 00824 - WORK COMP- EXPIJAN-FEBS8 32313 H SELF INSURERS SERVICE, INC. WORK-- COMP 00824 705-400-1209-4324 00028 *9.188.09 �IT�f INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 705-400-1217-4182 • 1a - 705-400-1217-4183 . �a - 25984 *0.00 04/06/88 25984 *0.00 04/06/88 25984 *0.00 04/06/88 25984 *0.00 04/06/88 25984 *0:00 04/06/88 25984 *0.00 04/06/88 25984 *0.00 04/06/88 25984 *0.-00 -04/06788 25984 *0.00 04/06/88 32314 05801 25986 *0.00 04/07/88 00047 *29.892.53 32313 • /WORKERS COMP CURRENT -YR -- 00036 *9.874.07 32367 • /WORKERS COMP -PRIOR YR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H STAPLETON NEON & ART CO. $48.954.69 02219 001-400-4204-4309 00883 *372.75 - - -.. DL'P65IT/3IcN O4/03/88— BLDG nwiN1 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 04599 25987 *0.00 04/07/88 04599 25987 $0.00 04/07/88 05713 25991 *0.00 04/07/88 4 e • .Y 1. 30 I'1 11 i 1f le .v ' 1V 40 + s ,, 47 .1 .. 44 ,13 ., 14 O ` ,U 1, FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 14:30:39 OF MERrfJBA BEACH - DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0004 DATE 04/07/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * • DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL *** ********* *********It***** 4372.75 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** PAY CODE TOTAL*************************************************1114/*************** $64.063.75 R A-1 SANDBLASTING & STUCCO CO. 02188 105-400-8202-4309 00049 42.000.00 1225 05455 25996 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** MATERIALS $2-.000.00 04/07/88 $2.000.00 R ACTION AUTO RENTAL 02209 110-300-0000-3302 19950 LITE 03/30/88 441.00 637096 05182 25997 -7COURT FINES/PARKING $0."00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $41.00 • ADVANCE ELEVATOR 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00229 480.00 19583 00003 25998 *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************************,***** SERVICE/PRIVAT _- - ._ - - *0.00 04/07/88 *80.00 R LT ANTHONY*ALTFELD COMMAND - 00774 001-400-2101-4312 00527 4273.75 a /TRAVEL EXPENSE -r-POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4273.75 05606 25999 40.00 04/07/88 R AMER-FOREIGN LANG NEWS. ASSOC 01214 001-400-1203-4201 00293 4132.96 22651 04499 26000 /LUNIKR61 SERVICE/PRIVAT -. -- 40.00 --04/07/88 EMP-ADS/PD-L*TERAL --03/ 11 /88 *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************************.********** R AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN 00401 001-400-4202-4316 00098 $132.96 4425.00 05714 26001 /23/88 PUB WKS iDnIN ,TRAINING — 40.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS PRIS MEALS/MARCH-88 4425. 00 00857 001-400-2101-4306 00485 4260.00 00033 26002 0313I/88-- PULTCE-- /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 40.00 04/07/98 • 140 • 17 I, • ,• • ,I • „ 1 26 „ ,6 • 4 m 11 • 1, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 V OF MENMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 1 • • sI PAGE 0005 • DATE 04/07/88 ,I VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CI$t * ^ • DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ****w ****************$************** r ********** $260.00 R MAUREEN*ANDERSON CITE- PAYMEN 02193 110-300-0000-3302 19956 $18.00 05267 26003 • INES/PARKING $0.00- 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************w************************* $18.00 R ASPA DUE8/K. NORTMCRAFT 00953 001-400-1201-4315 00039 03/24/88 $75.00 CITY AANAGEk /mEMBERSHIP R ASPA 00953 001-400-1202-4315 00028 $75.00 DUEStV:--COPEtAND•' 04/05/SB FINANCE ADnIrt /rIErBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $150.00 R ASPA INSURANCE PLANS -8-TRLY-PREM/CM LIFE INS R ASPA INSURANCE PLANS ORT -LY- PREMtCN--OISAB INS 02218 001-400-1212-4188 00994 = a '17 02218 001-400-1212-4188 03/17/ 00995 $44.70 BENEFITS a a- • „ • • , • 05802 26004 $0.00 04/07/88 05176 26004 $0.00 04/07/88 04494 26005 $0.00 04/07/88 $56.00 04493 26005 umAEFITS *0.-00 04/07/88 R AV-OX/PROFIRE --- MSC SEW/Midi-88— $100.70 ERW IAR-88--- $100.70 00603 001-400-2201-4309 00407 *190.31 03/31/88 FIRE —714AINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BANK OF AMERICA FEB EXPIR:-- -BLAC$WOOD-- R BANK OF AMERICA -- -FEW EXP/R. BLACrWuuu R BANK OF AMERICA FEB EXPtR. $190. 31 00180 001-400-1203-4201 00297 $1.16 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT PERSONNEL 00180 001-400-1203-4251 00079 00180 R BANK OF AMERICA 00180 MARCH EXP78-143 03/03 _ •I'1'I 001-400-1203-4317 00033 001-400-2101-4316 00204 a *38. 85 SERVICE/G0V1` $65.00 EXPENSE $79.45 ,TKAININO 00035 26006 $0.00 04/07/88 04498 26007 - $0.00 04/07/88 04498 26007 $0.00 04/07/88 04498 26007 $0.00 04/07/88 05697 26007 $0.00 04/07/88 1 • • • • • , FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 416 10 2? • it — 1 1) 11 11. 1. iN Iu • 1. 11 _ 1.1 41. 41. 41. 44 w DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0006 - - -- - DATE 04/07/88 VNO M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL *******r Mme******** **** **** ** $184.46 R BANK OF AMERICA SERV CHO/NOV 87 -JAN 88 01195 001-400-1141-4201 00044 $1.033.99 05175 26008 AC1 S.HVICEiPRIVAT $0.00 04/07/88 R BANK OF AMERICA 01195 001-400-1202-4201 00129 $757.66 --------- SERV-CHGS/NOV 87 -JAN -88 - AIN /LONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************.************************************ $1.791.65 R BANK OF HEMET 00549 001-400-2101-6900 00278 $15.169.00 05175 26008 $0.00 04/07/88 00038 26009 POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $15.169.00 R BEACH TRAVEL 00252 001-400-4101-4316 00096 $168.00 81733 03593 26010 -AIRFARE/A. PEREA 81731 03/23/88 PLANNING TRAINING $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL. ******************************************************************** $168.00 R ANOELA*BENJAMIN - .. ----MIMES/JAM SEC -CLASS 01419 001-400-2101-4313 00136 $16.38 05691 26011 03/16/88 POLICE 7TRAVEL'EXPENSE.' STC $0.00 04/07188 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************N ***************** $16.38 R 8I0 D FLOOR COVERING SUPPLIES 00846 001-400-4204-4309 00884 $171.71 LN75176 05488 26012 -- CARPET- TOOLS/PUBtIC NORR 7J17t- 03/27/88 BLDG 11rvT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *171.71 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $171.71 R ROBERT*BLACKW000 00366 001-400-1203-4316 00116 $46.00 04497 26013 ---_--MON-EXP/JAN-P1E8 88 02,tz tittAtNING - *0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $46. 00 R JIM*BLICKENSDERFER 01303 001-400-4601-4201 00183 $318.00 ----TECH --. -- --TECH SERV/MAR 03Y1 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 04849 26014 $0.00 04/07/88 I"I Cy ® 14 11 111 ift iv 121 I3, 111 I1 1. I1. FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 14:30:39 CITY OF ru_r rN t8A *EACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************wH► rs ************** R BOA ARCHITECTURE ASSESSMENT - 01744 001-400-4202-4201 00172 PAGE 0007 DATE 04/07/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $318. 00 $430.35 10437 05495 26015 /CONTRACT—SERVICETPRIVAT --*430.35 04/07/88 ***VENDOR TOTAL *************************************** *************** R BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS _D18PtAY EASEL= 94386 R BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS -MISe CHAS/MARCH SE 00005 001-400-1205-4305 00034 —02/09/88 CABLE TV $430.35 $122. 14 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00005 001-400-1208-4305 00469 $1.145.24 03/31/88 GEN APPROP —%OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************►********************************************** $1.267.38 R BREON. O'DONNELL & MILLER — MARCH- LABOR— *** VENDOR TOTAL 494386 05215 26016 $119.70 04/07/88 02144 001-400-1203-4201 00299 $207.00 3521-2201 04/01/88 PERSONNtL 7CONTRACT—SERVICE/PRIVAT" ******************************************************************** $207. 00 R BROOKS PRODUCTS 00036 26016 $0:00 04/07/88 05806 26017 $0:00 04/07/88 00136 105-400-2601-4309 00319 $774.00 1942/2768/3368 05432 03/24/88 STREET LIGHiiNQ /MAINIENANLt MATERIALS $773.99 ***VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GAIL*BROWN -- PER -0I -EM -- A $774. 00 01004 001-400-2101-4317 00083 $250. 00 OLICE /CONFERENCE EXPENSE .. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00155 TRASH- P1eKUPtMAR— 04/01 R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES -TRASH—PICKUP/MAR—APR—SS-- 00155 TRASH—PICKU /MAR—APR SS - 001-400-1208-4201 00425 QEN APPROr 00155 110-400-3301-4201 00151 04/01/88 VEH PKG DIST $250.00 $1.102.22 /..ONTRACT SERVICEIPRIVAT-.. $894.40 FCONTRACT--SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL *************************************** *************** $1.996.62 R BSI CONSULTANTS. INC. PLAN CHECKS/BLDG/FEB-SW-434437s 26018 04/07/88 TR198 00198 26019 $0.00 04/07/88 I. 00005 26020 I.. $0.00 04/07/88 00005 26020 $0.00 04/07/88 00630 001-400-4201-4201 00092 $955.24 54437 04929 03/09/88- DuLLDING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 26021 04/07/88 • I • t I 44 44 44 40 „ FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 C al1 OP WEAPIOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0008 • DATE 04/07/88 VNO * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP I r *** VENDOR TOTAL *****$I**U** N ****N*$***4*.**** ► **N4**4 r*t* $955.24 R W. ROBERT*BUCHINSKY _.._ _-TECM SERWMAR- 88 02116 001-400-4601-4201 00184 03/1,71x8 *40. 00 Curwi RESOvRCES /CONTKACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT-- *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************* *N***************** *40. 00 R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY - - -- COMPUTER -TAPE REELS 00034 001-400-1206-4305 00287 *1.398.45 03/26/88 DATA PROCESbING iurrTCE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************w************************ *1.398.45 R CACDA 1988 CONFERENCE REQISTRATION"/H. 02216 001-400-2401-4317 00016 *4* VENDOR TOTAL **************************************** *************** $100.00 XPENSE R CALIF ANIMAL CONTROL DIRECTORS 01464 001-400-2401-4315 00010 - - MEMBER- DUES/M7-STATEN 0 $100. 00 $35.00 ANInAL CONTROL /nenBERS.+IP *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************************************** ******** $35.00 04850 26022 $0.00 04/07/88 05230 26023 *1.394.94 04/07/88 TR199 00199 26024 *0.00 04/07/88" 05286 26025 -$0.-00 04/07/88 R CALIF NARCOTICS OFCRS ASSOC. 01798 001-400-2101-4315 00096 $20.00 05620 26026 '"--"/88 POLICEMBERSHIP $0.00 04/07/88 -"DUES/DET" PAT -WA *** VENDOR TOTAL************N**********************************N*******N*****N****** *20.00 R THE*CALIF PARK & REC. SOCIETY 00602 001-400-4601-4315 00031 $300.00 AGY-88-054 04853 26027 AGENCY DUES/FY 87..88-- 4 .- 03/24180- /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************************** ******************* *300.00 R CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MAINT. PARKS- MAINT//MARCH- 01223 001-400-6101-4201 00098 $7.263.33 8030070 .i• 40.00 04/07/88 05715 26028 ACT SERVICE7PRIVAT-"-- $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL. ***************** *****w *************** *7.263.33 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE MON WATER BILLS/MR-1W 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00214 4434.61 03,a1/88 BLDG17AINT /UTILITIES 05188 26029 *0.00 04/07/88 • • • • 11 H 2l 71 23 f. Pi 2! r .o .1 u a .Y • " • • • • I • 41 4. FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 .i 1.3 .,_ DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0009 DATE 04/07/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE MON WATER BILLBIMAR 88 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00193 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE iLLB/MAR 80 $586.36 PARKS 1uILLITItb 00016 115-400-3101-4303 00148 $1.781.75 /UTILIJLEb 03/31/88 AtuIAP18 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***** *******************www* ****** *******a•i* $2.802.72 R CANOVA MOVING RELOCATION 02183 001-400-1203-4201 00296 7 -.4 •1'17 *3.018.20 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** „L R CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE TUt-TIONtJ- KEARIN 02000 001-400-2101-4312 00528 R CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE YWTi0N>tT. M. LAVIN $3. 018. 20 05188 26029 $0.00 04/07/88 05188 26029 $0.00 04/07/88 04488 26030 $2.400.00 04/07/88 $180.00 05613 26031 $0.00 04/07/88 02000 001-400-2101-4312 00531 3180.00 05611 26031 /TRAvtC-EXPENSE . POST- *MOO 04/07/88 POLICE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $360. 00 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MON- R CHAMPION CHEVROLET • -MON CHOS/MARCN--88 -- 00014 001-400-2101-4311 00467 $588.18 00014 -03/31788 11 001-400-4204-4311 00081 $43.71 T /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $631.89 R CHANDLER'S PV READY MIX 00009 001-400-3103-4309 00605 $319.49 MISC-CHGS/MARCtt-08 03/31788 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $319. 49 R CLARK COMPUTER & COMMUNICATION 02204 001-400-1206-4316 00049 $1.190.00 SEM REB! ---248 04/08/88 DATA PROCt8SIAG /TRAINING- *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************3******************** $1.190.00 00039 26032 $0.00 04/07/88 00039 26032 $0.00 04/07/88 00310 26033 $0.00 04/07/88 148 05271 26034 $0.00 04/07/88 R DENNIS*CLELAND 02213 001-210-0000-2110 02070 *75.00 47969 05094 26035 WORK GUAR REFUND - - 47969 -0310=188- -" '---'-- - /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/07/88 • G• +. • • • • • I..• 1:: • i • I • i• • • • •. '4 tl 44. FINANCE-9FA340 TIME 14:30:39 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0010 FOR 04/12/88 DATE 04/07/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN • AMOUNT DATE INVC PRO.) * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL *****************************************4HHHHHHHHHHHHHIHI*****.r****** INV/REF PO * CHR * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $75. 00 R CLEWOA ANNUAL-DUES/POLTCE 01008 001-400-2101-4315 --03124-188 POLICE 00095 $25.00 7MEMBERSHIP 1 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R COM SYSTEMS, INC - - -L-ONG -DISTANCE MAR 88 R COM SYSTEMS. INC - -tONG-018-TANCE/MAR-88-------- R COM SYSTEMS. INC --------LONO-IHMTANCE/ AR03/31/88 CITI 00017 0 001-400-1101-4304 00017 R COM SYSTEMS, INC Lome-otsTANetnwiter R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG -DIS ANCE/MAR 88 00158 OUNCIL 001-400-1121-4304 00150 CITY CLERK 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00146 ERMA R 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00159 $25.00 $2. 69 /TELEPHONE - $2. 22 /TELEPHONE $46.45 /TELEPHumm $7.66 R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG -DISTANCE/MOW-1M 00017 001-400-1202-4304 00164 0 $41. 76 n 00017 001-400-1203-4304 00163 03/31/88 PEhSONNEL R COM SYSTEMS. INC 00017 001-400-2101-4304 00233 -LONG- DISTANCE/MAR-88- 03/31/88 POLICE I t. ertit.114E- R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-2401-4304 00152 LONG-DISTANCE 88 03/31/88 n L. R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-4101-4304 00162 LONG DrarAmentomrimr----- 03/31/88 PLANNI $19.04 HOett $148.03 /TELEPHONE - $9. 39 , i tt.EPHDNE $12. 66 /TELEPHONE R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-4201-4304 00163 $32.10 - LON.- Dt8TANCEMAR-88--- 03/31/88 R COM SYSTEMS. INC tON0-018-TANCE" 00017 BUILDING 7TELEPHONE 001-400-4202-4304 05603 26036 $0.00 04/07/88 05189 26037 $0.00 04/07/88 , • 1'. I 05189 26037 -$M00 04/07/88' 1,! 05189 26037 $0.00 04/07/88 05189 26037 $0.00 04/07/88 05189 26037 '$0:00 04/07/88 - - 05189 26037 $0.00 04/07/88 05189 26037 *0.00 04/07/88 05189 26037 $0.00 04/07/88 05189 26037 $0.00 04/07/88 05189 26037 $0.00 04/07/88 00165 $57.62 05189 26037 •:' / R COM SYSTEMS. INC 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00177 - - - LONG DISTANCe/MAR- 88- -03/31/88 CuMh REbOURCES $34. 89 /TELEPHONE $0.00 04/07/88 05189 26037 $0.00 04/07/88 • • • • i 9 11 14 • ' • ,. • .I 11 • H • .. .9 IUU .' 41 •4445 • 99 • • CITY Or HEknOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011 TIME 14:30:39 FOR 04/12/88 DATE 04/07/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK • DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R COM SYSTEMS. INC 00017 105-400-2601-4304 00083 $22.57 05189 26037 .ON6 DtSTH 03/31/88 STREET LIwrifINWr 7TECEPHONE - $0.00 04/07/88 R COM SYSTEMS. INC 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00161 $144.09 05189 26037 - ---LONG-DISTANCE/MAR 8b 03,3t188 PARKING Emir iitLEPRORE *0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****CHH ************** wwE***+HH► ***** F*** $581. 17 R COMPASS ENGINEERING CO.. INC. 02120 001-400-4101-4305 00186 $1.052.54 3557 03596 26038 - - PVBLIC NQTI -03/14,88 moos -new- 'OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.052.54 R THE *COPY SHOP PRINTED-' A INDOW- 00022 110-400-3302-4305 00398 $202.35 PARKING ENF /0FrIt.t -OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R TOM*CRAY MILEStADV 00533 O 001-400-2101-4312 00536 $202.35 $43.68 05262 26039 $202.35 04/07/88 05692 26040 i'HAVEL hxrENbS . POST - - - $0. 00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $43. 68 R CSULB FOUNDATION RE6t9-PARKING OPPICERS — 00349 110-400-3302-4316 00107 *573.75 'TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $573.75 R DATA SAFE MOt t CMGS/NARCM- 88- 00156 001-400-1206-4201 05276 26041 $0.00 04/07/88 00353 $85.50 35922 00047 26042 SERVICE/PRIVAT - $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DEL AMO KAWASAKI 00303 001-400-2101-4311 00468 -_- MSC- CMGStMARCM 88 03,16/88 POLICE *85.50 $8.43 00313 26043 /AUTu MINT flAITENANCE------- ---.- -_ --- -$0.00 - 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $8.43 R DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SERV 01857 001-400-2101-4251 00189 $480.60 5744 00046 26044 AWWS SERV/FEB 88.. 5744 - 03t16788 7CE-------- /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 04/07/88 .• • . • • .• • • • 4 • • 3 4 • 4/ 11 1. 24 1/ /6 h 1. 3, FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 LIT OF newrOS - BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0012 DATE 04/07/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ******** ***** **** t**ww****** i*,e ,*1H►M ************* f** R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -SAY MAINT/JAN 88 0407 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY-MAINT/FEB 00267 105-400-2601-4251 00053 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION --K!OMWAY-MAINT/JAN 09 0407 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -HTCHWAY-MAINT/FEB 89 0444 *480. 60 *660. 26 /04/88 STREt: I LIGHTING 7LuN t nA .. I SERVICE/Guv i 00267 00267 00267 03/18/88 105-400-2601-4251 a 115-400-3104-4251 115-400-3104-4251 00051 IRArFLC ISAFEir 00054 00050 *515. 69 SERVICE100VT *660. 25 ACT SERVICE/GOVT 104072 05709 26045 $0.00 04/07/88 104422 05725 26045 *0.00 04/07/88 104072 05709 26045 *0.00 04/07/88 *515.69 104422 / L.0N I NAL. 1 *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************.**************.***,********* *2.351.89 R DFM ASSOCIATES -- — - -—ELECfii0N CODES 00726 001-400-1122-4305 00053 02/05/88 EtkCTIONS 05725 26045 *0.00 04/07/88 *84.38 7054 04523 26046 /Orru..t OPER SUPPLIES -' *84.38 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *84.38 R DIVE N' SURF MON CMG8/MARC 00604 001-400-2201-4309 00405 03/31/88 FIRE *24. 00 1nRINitNANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *24.00 ,6 R DUNCAN INDUSTRIES 00122 41 .6 .. a 5/ 110-400-3302-4309 00392 00315 26047 *0.00 04/07/88 *93.77 P001614-0 05255 26048 INTENANCE MATERIALS - *84.77 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DYNAMED ?CIBC *93. 77 01498 001-400-2201-4309 00406 *38.16 03/31/88 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************i►************************** *38.16 R E-MAIL INCORPORATED 02069 - --ELECTRONIC MAIL -AWARE --120-. - 02116/88 001-400-1206-4201 00353 26049 *0.00 04/07/88 00352 *2.556.00 120 04189 26050 MTA PROCEtitulvil /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT - $2.556.00 04/07/88 0 • • .e • 0 • ,'° • ri • .' • r' • .' • I'' • 0 Mr FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 Y'Lr HEkMOWA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R E-MAIL INCORPORATED 02069 001-400-1206-5400 00145 -0211-8 $1.597.50 A PROCESbING 'EQUIPMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************w+*** ********** ** ******** R OFCR TOM*ECKERT MFItES/ADV 01958 001-400-2101-4312 00535 / POLICE PAGE 0013 DATE 04/07/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *4.153.50 $62.40 i 1 AAvtL'EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CMOS/MARCH-88-- R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS -MISCCHAS/MARCH 88 00165 001-400-2101-4311 00465 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC--CHCS/MARCH 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS — MISC CMGS/MARCM- 88-- 88 POL ICE" 00165 001-400-2201-4311 03/31/88 FIRE 00207 00165 001-400-3103-4309 00607 $62. 40 *535. 08 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $110.63 /AUTO -MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-3103-4311 00336 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MSC CMOStMARCH 88--- R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CM98/M4RCH'----- R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS mete CHAS - 1 ST MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-4101-4311 00073 -03, 00165 PLANNING 001-400-4202-4311 00079 03/31/88 PUB Wk8 ADMIN 00165 001-400-4205-4309 00248 $9.61 INTENANCE MATERIALS $778. 70 /AUTO IIA I N t tNAN ..t $80.77 7AUT0-11AINTENANCE $76.85 /AUTO MAINTENANCE R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4205-4310 MISC CH®8/MARCH 88 03131788 EQUIP R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CMGS/MARCH-88--- R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS - —MISC—CMOS/MARCH-88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS -Mi9C-CHOS>MARCM -- 00165 001-400-4205-4311 03/31/88 EQUIP 00103 $690.86 NTENANCE MATERIALS $14.70 ICE- /mut UR FUELS AND LUBES 00090 $126.08 VICE 7AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-4601-4311 00047 03/31/88 COMA RESOuRCEB 00165 001-400-6101-4311 00151 03/31/88 PARKS $158.52 UTO MAINTENANCE-.. $146.42 7AUTO"MAINTENANCE 121 05283 26050 $0.00 04/07/88 05690 26051 $0:00 04/07/88 00316 26052 $0.00 04/07/88 00316 26052 $0.00 04/07/88 00316 26052 $0.00 04/07/88 00316 26052 $0.00 04/07/88 00316 26052 $0.00 04/07/88 00316 26052 $0.00 04/07/88 00316 26052 $0.00 04/07/88 00316 26052 $0.00 04/07/88 00316 26052 $0.00 04/07/88 00316 26052 $0.00 04/07/88 00316 26052 $0.00 04/07/88 7 . 22 11 •6 44 .4 FINALE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 BA DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0014 • DATE 04/07/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHI * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R EDDINQS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC-CHQS/MARCH 88 R EDDINQS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS --MtSC CHOS/MARGH 88 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00165 00342 $125.35 ARkINQ ENF /AUTO nAINTENANCE— 115-400-3104-4311 00059 R EDDINQS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS -----.M/SC CHOS/MARCM 88 4 $152.30 00316 26052 30.00 04/07/88 00316 26052 r IC WV- t I r /AUTO riAIRTENANCE _-... _._ _. - --- -. -- - $0. 00 -04/07188 00165 160-400-3102-4311 -03731 00088 $101.67 AUTO PIAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************************r********w***** $3.107.54 R EMERSON ELECTRONICS ------- - @IASLLO TRACTOR -FEEDS 00424 001-400-1206-5400 00147 $356.45 ATA PRuCEmei lNG ?EQUIPMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $356.45 R FAMILY PRACTICE ASSOCIATES 00054 001-400-1203-4320 00188 $35.00 -- EMPLOYEE — /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R FILARSKY & WATT --- - - - - MARCH- LEGAt 00055 001-400-1203-4201 00300 A _11 'I *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $35. 00 $1. 957. 50 ACT -SERVI CEiPR !VAT R RON*FOX - MEALS/JAIt--TRNO CLASS 01007 001-400-2101-4313 00135 -03/16'/8B POLICE $1.957.50 $21.75 ?TRAVEL EXPENSE. STC *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *21.75 R CITY OF*QARDENA EAP/APR JUN 88 R CITY OF*QARDENA EAP/APR-JUN-88- 00316 26052 $0.00 04/07/88 52558 05261 26053 $0.00 04/07/88 05804 26054 $0.00 04/07/88 05805 26055 $0.00 04/07/88 05696 26056 $0.00 04/07/88 00706 001-400-1212-4188 00996 $807.30 00011 26057 -04 a6 EMP BEr1EFITS /EheLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 04/07/88 R CITY OF*QARDENA —EAPtAPR-•JUN 88-- 00706 105-400-2601-4188 00468 $17.70 00011 26057 04/01,88 STREET LIQPii IniQ /tPIF'LOYEE-BENEFITS . $0.00 04/07/88 00706 110-400-3301-4188 00478 82.40 00011 26057 -04/01/88 VEH PPO DIST-7EMPtOYEE BENEFITS - - $0.00 04/07/88 • FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 14:30:39 CLTY OF nakMOBA BEACk DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION er"R CITY OF*GARDENA • ----------EAPtAPR-JUM-188- 1,. e!" CITY OF*GARDENA --EAPIAPR.NJUN 88 •."1R CITY OF*GARDENA • 114 R CITY OF*GARDENA -EAP/APR-JUN R CITY OF*GARDENA 00706 110-400-3302-4188 00638 04/01/88 PARKIN° ENF 00706 115-400-3101-4188 00371 04/u1188 MELIAN6 00706 494.74 ftrIPLOYht. IshNtrit 416.20 115-400-3104-4188 00407 -04/ C SArt 00706 --04101/88 145-400-3401-4188 00414 00706 145-400-3402-4188 00412 PAGE 0015 DATE 04/07/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP /EMPLuyhE BENEFITS 411.70 rEMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2. 46 --11B*MMYEEBENEFITS' R CITY OF*GARDENA -EAPtAPR-JUN 88 R CITY OF*GARDENA —EAPtAPR-dt/14-813R --- • z" CITY OF*GARDENA 111 __Elipmpft.rdupt_eter___ • *** VENDOR TOTAL 00706 , • 00706 04/01 145-400-3407-4188 1. :1: 155-400-2102-4188 00156 11 00166 43.00 /trirLurtt -BENEFITS 40.60 -irEMPLOYEE- BENEFITS 31.20 00706 160-400-3102-4188 1,4/01/88 UARD ItnrLOrmt BENEFITS 00011 26057 40.00 04/07/88 00011 26057 $0.00 04/07/88 00011 26057 $0.00 04/07/88 00011 26057 $0.00 04/07/88 00011 26057 40.00 04/07/88 00011 26057 $0.00 04/07/88 00011 26057 $0:00 04/07/88 00429 $14.70 00011 26057 DRAIN /ftnrLuret-BENEFITS- 40:00 ' '04/07/88 ******************************************************************** 4972.00 R GENERAL. ELECTRIC SUPPLY M: L!E!XThRE5 01-35B •R • I '' 1/ 41 41 dp 41 dp 4... 11 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY -. MISC tHOSMARt1488- R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY MISC- CHOSMARCH- 88 00058 105-400-8201-4309 00035 43,940.50 845-401356 04799 03/21/88 -MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 43.940.50 00058 105-400-8201-4309 00036 4142.50 03/31/88 CIP 8 MAINTENANCE MATERTALS 00058 115-400-3104-4309 00517 $53.89 -03tarms TRAFFIC -SAFETY- -/PIAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 44,136.89 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY R GENERAL. TELEPHONE COMPANY TEtE-CHOS-MARC14-811-- 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00159 $58.87 03/31/88 CIiy COUNCIL i•IftLtrk *ft 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00151 03/31/88 *33. 58 CITY Ci..ERp/ tLEPRONE 26058 04/07/88 00318 26058 $0. 00 04/07/88 00318 26058 $0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 $0.00 174/07/88 26060 $0.00 04/07/88 • • • • . • • • • .„ • • I 4 e • 14 I R FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 CI TT L HERMOSA *EACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY ---- - ---- TE HGS/MARCH 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - TELE-CMOS/MARCH 88 r R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 151-- -TELE R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHAS/MARCH 8B"-- R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY ------TELE CMOS/MARCH 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00096 *220. 48 .. L I r A 1 I Urtrvtr ' u tCEPHONE 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00147 *18.13 03/31/88 CIT�f TREASUKER 7TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00160 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00165 0 00015 *96. 99 EPHONE *38. 51 INiNCE ADMIN /*TELEPHONE 001-400-1203-4304 00164 00015 001-400-1206-4304 *40. 60 -7TECEPMONE - - 00092 *227.09 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE-CMS/MARCH-88- GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CMOS/MARCH-SS R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHOW -MARCH 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CH98IMARCH-88-- R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MARCH-88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE-CHGB/MARCH 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY „ ------TELE-CM S/MRC AH - ■I - - 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00082 00015 7TELEPHONE *27. 87 BUS LICENSt 'TELEPHONE - 001-400-2101-4304 00234 *621.88 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00098 *234.23 -03/31/88 00015 001-400-2401-4304 /TELEPHONE 00153 *9.24 00015 -03/,1/88 001-400-2701-4304 00064 *4. 20 /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00163 *107.16 03/31/88 /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00164 *119.55 /TELEPHONE /31 /88 00015 BUILDINi 001-400-4202-4304 00166 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 TELE CH08/MARC14188--03131188- *271. 20 /TELEPHONE 001-400-4204-4321 00338 *18.27 BLDG MANN PAGE 0016 DATE 04/07/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP /BUILDINO SAFETY/SECURIT 05192 26060 *0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 30.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 *0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 60.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 *0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 -$0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 *0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 *0.00 04/07788 05192 26060 *0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 *0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 *0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 *0:00 04/07/88 05192 26060 *0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 *0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 *0.00 04/07/88 • • • e • .7 • I„ i iA FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 14:30:39 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0017 FOR 04/12/88 DATE 04/07/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - TEL£ -CHCS R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ------ - -"--TELE R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELA CHGStrARCM 08 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY i' ---TELE 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00178 03/31/08 $268. 67 KC.tb /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00096 $6.16 Fi.LEPHONE 03/31/88 PwRKS 00015 110-400-3301-4304 00079 03/31/88 VEH PhO FIST /TtLEPHOrve $11.65 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00162 $363.80 03/31/88 PARAINO Ei4F /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL ******** ►*******+**w►*** ******* * r ******** ****** • 1! 1" • .e • • " R GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES -TAPE-STORAGE-RACK 00275 14509 02/19 001-400-1206-5400 *2.798.13 00146 $269.51 • PMU..ESSINrrtrvr $269.51 VENDOR TOTAL**************+t*******Ht************* ********x********** 05192 26060 $0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 $0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 $0.00 04/07/88 05192 26060 $0.00 04/07/88 18014509 05228 26061 - $256.56 04/07/88 R GOODHEW AMBULANCE SERVICE 01910 001-400-2101-4306 00483 $159.25 001-832078-000 05698 26062 PRISONER -TRANSPORT — - 800 .- 03/1.5/88 POLICt /PRIbuNtrt 1'IAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $159.25 $0.00 04/07/88 R ROBERT*GRAHAM 02198 001-210-0000-2110 02080 $50.00 55203 05904 26063 ANIMAL -'TRAP 03/31/88 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R WILLIAM*GROVE 00701 001-400-4201-4316 00110 MON EXP/MARCH 88 03131/88 $50.00 $20. 00 BUILDING /TRAINING •i" *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************************11H1*IHHHHH1*********** , -FIREFIGHTER- GLOVES - r. R HALPRIN SUPPLY COMPANY • 00946 001-400-2201-4309 FIKE $20. 00 04934 26064 $0.00 04/07/88 00404 $90.10 H88964 05315 26065 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -”--- $88.66 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************ ******** R HANSON ASSOCIATES $90.10 02181 001-400-6101-4309 00464 $156.00 SCOREBOARD REPAIR/CLARK--.-3678 03/24188 -"-PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 5678 05705 26066 $0.00 04/07/88 a • 14 a 41 . 14 41 4. .l u • CIT' OF MERnOSA eEACn FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 14:30:39 FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0018 DATE 04/07/88 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R HANSON ASSOCIATES CONT' GO 02181 001-400-6101-4309 00466 5647 03/15/88 PARKS 4383.00 5637 05500 26066 7MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -4383.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL *************** r ►uwar****************** * pit********w* *********** *539. 00 R HAWTHONE POLICE DEPARTMENT 00172 001-400-2101-4251 MAR 88 H815 03/31/88 00187 46, 300. 00 H915 IGt NTKACT SERVICEIGOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************rr*************************it********** 46.300.00 R HERMOSA CAR WASH - MISC SERV/MARCH 8 • HERMOSA CAR WASH . MISC BERV/MARCH 8 R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 001-400-1201-4311 00059 03/31/88 CITY RAPIAGER — /AVT0 00065 001-400-2101-4311 00466 03/31/88 POLICE 00065 001-400-2401-4311 00114 -- __-14ISC—SERV/ n - - - tAUTO /AUTO R HERMOSA CAR WASH -MISC-SERWMARCM 8 R HERMOSA CAR WASH — -- -_— -Mise SERV 00065 001-400-4201-4311 00111 /31/88 BVILDINO /AUTO 00065 110-400-3302-4311 00343 03/31/88 PARNINJG ENF /Aur0- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY COMPUTER MAO -TAPES 00403 001-400-1206-4305 00286 $4.00 MAINTENANCE-- $148.50 MAINTENANCE $5.50 MAINTENANCE $12.00 MAI NTENAry ..t 44. 00 'MAINTENANCE - $174.00 4187.44 10905572/73 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY ATP PORT CONTROLLER/COMP 00149 001-400-1206-5400 00148 $187.44 45. 439. 17 DATA PR0..ESIsING 7EOUIPMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 45,439.17 R CONCORD*HILTON 02215 001-400-2401-4317 00015 4211.58 LODGING ADV/H: -STATEN- 'TRi99- _ - 04/07/88-- nAL C■ TROC /CONFERENCE EXPENSE 00042 26067 40.00 04/07/88 00320 26068 40.00 04/07/88 00320 26068 40.00 04/07/88 00320 26068 40.00 04/07/88 00320 26068 *0.00 04/07/88 00320 26068 40.00 04/07/88 05229 26069 40.00 04/07/88 7AW0242 05214 26070 --$5,439.17 - 04/07/88 TR199 00199 26071 40.00 04/07/88 • I; I. • IMP • • • • .6 .1 16 n 21 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 CITY OF HEWP106A BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTALu******************************* PAGE 0019 DATE 04/07/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $211. 58 R ORETCHEN*HOLLANDER -- -tiTE* PAYMENT REPUND 12120 02207 110-300-0000-3302 03/30/88 19952 $15.00 612120 05184 26072 7C'OURT- FINE8/PARKIN6 - - " ., $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL *************************** ** ********* R ICMA PUBtICATIONS- 00157 001-400-1203-4316 00117 03/18/88 PERSONNEL $15. 00 $80.00 1TRAININO ***VENDOR TOTAL*********************a*********************************+t+►*********** R IDENTICARD SYSTEMS INC ID CAR • R IDENTICARD SYSTEMS INC ID" -CARDS/FIRE • 1: It • ., • 11 .6 •" I 66 i810 „ I 8 02001 001-400-2101-4305 00661 03/1200, POLICE 02001 001-400-2201-4305 00172 03/16788 FIRE $80.00 $1.419.36 /OFFII.t urft SUPPLIES.. $436.84 /Oi-r-ICE-'OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.856.20 R CITY OF*INOLEWOOD -TRAIN 00796 001-400-2201-4316 00107 03/29/88 FIRt $2.400.00 iikATNTNQ *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.400.00 R INSTIT. & MUNICIPAL PKO CONG. 01322 .-- DUES/JOAN-NOON- —INOON- —03101 110-400-3302-4315 00023 PARKIN? ENF $230.00 /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $230.00 R INTEREX SEMINAR REG/Mt- STURGES 02007 001-400-1206-4316 00048 O $375. 00 A PROCESSING /TRAINING- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4 •I R INTERNATIONAL PRESS ASSOC. INC impurantlumr 30944 00375 001-400-1203-4201 00295 04/11/88 PEkOOrINEL $375. 00 $171.48 ON,RRl.i SERVICE7PRIVAT 04495 26073 $0.00 04/07/88 42258 05552 26074 $1.4I1.66 04/07/88 42258 05552 26074 $466.84 04107/88 • 10216 05321 26075• $0.00 04/07/88 RG/NOON 05281 26076 *0.00 04/07/88 04173 26077 $0.00 04/07/88 30944 04490 26078 -"--_ $0.00 -04/07/88 1..; • 11 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 I) • 1 15 le 20 11 22 /I 14 l• 2/ 1.11 13 10 4.; . I 4. GIP, OF nr-KramoN somm.m DEMAND LIST '4 PAGE 0020 FOR 04/12/88 DATE 04/07/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $171.48 R JOHNSON'S ALIGNMENT SERVICE -------- ALIMENT/AN CONT DATSUN 01523 001-400-2401-4311 00113 $24.50 -03/02708 ANIriAi.. CONTROL "PiUTO-MAINTENANCE *41* VENDOR TOTAL *****41-1H/r*******111111***********IH141.114.111H111HHHHHI!***IHH114.11141111-11-******411H1***** R KAVANAUGH DEVELOPMENT CO. INC. 02061 001-210-0000-2110 02073 WORK-GUAR-IIIPUter 4799703131/08 $24. 50 05257 26079 $0.00 04/07/88 $272.49 47997 05097 26080 TDEPOSITS7WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $272.49 R JOHN*KEARIN ---MEALS/INTERNAL APF SEM 01032 001-400-2101-4312 00529 $21.75 OJtaIthe t AVEL- EXPENSE POST- *** VENDOR TOTAL **IHI.******IHI.*****4H1****************H.***********4H******************* $21. 75 R KELLY PAPER COMPANY -XEROX-P~PSTOCK 00212 001-400-1208-4305 00468 r 05612 26081 $0.00 04/07/88 $1.062.87 323545 05168 26082 ,uFFi -OPER- SUPPLIES $0. 00 04707/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL *************11-************************************************* *1.062.87 R THE*KIPLINGER CALIF. LETTER 02025 001-400-1202-4316 00187 $34.00 - SUBSCRIPTI-ONIV. eOPELAND---- 04/0*t88 FINANCE /MmHg -"TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************44****************** *34.00 05187 26083 $0.00 04/07/88 R ARTHUR T.*KIRCHHOFF 02206 110-300-0000-3302 19953 $41.00 588693 05185 26084 CITE PAYMENT REFUND-- ---88893- /88 COURT F I NES /PARK I NG *** VENDOR TOTAL. **************************************************************** $41. 00 *0.00 04/07/88 R APRIL*KJAR 02200 001-210-0000-2110 02078 $50.00 54657 05902 26085 - -ANIMAL-TRAP-REFUND 54857--- /31/88 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE-- -- $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL. *************IHI*************4H14************************4H1*********** *50. 00 R SOT JOHN*KOEBSELL 00629 001-400-2101-4313 00134 $21.75 MEALS/JAIL TRW -SCHOOL- --- -03/16788 ----POLICE-- /TRAVEL EXPENSE. STC 05695 26086 $0.00 04/07/88 107 1 1l 0.1 11 rr 11 74 1. 141 411 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 r 1' �F r1EkM08A BEACh DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL +►+►**** ►**** ►www* *******+ter** ►*►** ►************ ****** R LT MICHAEL*LAVIN - MEALS/ IN 00792 03,31/88 001-400-2101-4312 PAGE 0021 DATE 04/07/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *21. 75 00530 *21.75 /TRAVEL EXPENSE- _POST *** VENDOR TOTAL *************************************** ***************** R LEARNED LUMBER MISC-CHOSYMAR 88 R LEARNED LUMBER - MISC--CHOS/MAR B R LEARNED LUMBER $21.75 00167 001-400-3103-4309 00606 $53.21 03731/88- 81 MAINTENANCE- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00167 001-400-4201-4305 00280 ICu 00167 001-400-4204-4309 00887 *46. 48 FOFFICE-OPER SUPPLIES LEARNED LUMBER ----141-8C-0408 8 00167 001-400-4204-4321 03/31/88 00337 *73. 52 MATERIALS- LEARNED ATERIAtS- *8. 91 n R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-6101-4309 00467 MISC CMG8/MAR 88- -03731788-- PARKS R LEARNED LUMBER -MSC CHCS/MAR 88 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC-CM08/MAR 88- 00167 001-400-8604-4309 00102 03 CIP 86-604 00167 105-400-8201-4309 00037 BUILDING SArtTT/SECURIT $230. 55 ,MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $41.22 ?MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $18. 79 ?MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *472.68 ; 0 1 1" I R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. 00077 115-400-3104-4309 00516 $156.24 MAPS/PUBLIC-WORKS---17*4? -- 03/07/88- TRAFFIC SAFETY !MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $156.24 R LOS ANGELES TIMES - EMPLOYEE ADStPOLICR- 10949--. 00213 001-400-1203-4201 00298 03727/88 PERSONNEL 05610 26087 $0.00 04/07/88 00323 26088 *0.00 04/07/88 00323 26088 *0.00 04/07/88 00323 26088 $0.00 04/07/88 00323 26088 *0.00 04/07/88 00323 26088 *0:00 04/07/88 00323 26088 $0.00 04/07/88 00323 26088 $0.00 04/07/88 217447 04793 26089 *156.23 04/07/88 $876.83 13-010949 7CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************************** ********* *876.83 R JAMES P. *LOUGH RETAINER/MARCH 88'-___.• - 00938 001-400-1131-4201 00358 $5,747.00 -03131788-- C 1_ r -A r [URNtY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 05807 26090 *0.00 04/07/88 04075 26091 $0.00 04/07/88 I • • • • • • 0^ I • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 aF F1ERl ► BkAC1 DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAGE 0022 DATE 04/07/88 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * ';Q DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • *** VENDOR TOTAL. CHH ******11****►*****"." *** tet*** 45. 747. 00 • R CITY OF *MANHATTAN BEACH 00183 115-400-3101-4251 00012 4524.22 4069 05703 26092 _.-ARTESIA-BLVD 1't 03/08/d6 AELIANS F UNIRACT SERVICE/GOVT - 4524.22 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************o.*********************4►**************** 4524.22 R MANHATTAN CAR WASH 1R?SC-CHG8/FEB'88- 01146 001-400-2101-4311 00469 448.00 7AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************** ********* 448.00 iM R MANHATTAN FORD --- -- ---MISC-CH08/MARCH 88 00605 001-400-3103-4311 00335 4603. 98 MAINTENANCE R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 105-400-2601-4311 00090 419.11 MISC-tHQS/UNCI 88 03/31/88 8TRttT LIGFiTINC /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MARINEBANC LEASING CO.. INC. 02154 -LEASE-PMT/APRIL-88 04/01/88 *623.09 001-400-4205-6900 00004 4417.96 EGVIP 8t�NaCE-7tEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4417.96 R MCI MAIL 02153 001-400-1206-4304 00093 - MON CMGS/MARCFr88 03/31/88 42.00 muummuNW ii LEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JOHN*MILNE 02126 001-210-0000-2110 02072 i l - - WORK GUAR REFUND -7924 03/31/88 $2.00 00228 26093 40.00 04/07/88 00329 26094 40.00 04/07/88 00329 26094 40.00 04/07/88 00054 26095 40.00 04/07/88 05191 26096 40.00 04/07/88 4286.79 47924 05096 26097 ,DtruuITS/WORK GUARANTEE 40.00 04/07/88 R JOHN*MILNE 02126 001-210-0000-2110 02075 4775.00 47948 05099 26097 WORK -GUAR- REFUND 47948— -03/31-/08 -"DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 40.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL **********************-1H1-11******* 41,061.79 R MOHLE. GROVER & ASSOCIATES 01499 115-400-3104-4201 00044 41.689.86 88-30/87-147 04247 26098 TRAFFIC SAFETY "-/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00 04/07/88 TRAFFIC 8 I 0 WORK — -----7-147-- 03/01'188- :. r as 7 ,0 • FINANCE–SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 OF HEWP08A BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************* ***** ********** PAGE 0023 DATE 04/07/88 INV/REF PO * Chet * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1.689.86 R MONARCH BROOM MSC-CMGS/MARCH-88 00084 001-400-3103-4309 00604 $304.59 rIAIrnstNANCE –MAINTENANCE MATERIALS • I� *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************************** *********** 1! • t. 11 I„ 121 • 110 • r • r • $304.59 R MUNICIPAL TOY COMPANY 01517 001-400-4601-4308 00114 $389.40 – EASTER 03/05 /PROGRAM MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************** ********** $389.40 00330 26099 $0.00 04/07/88 1360 04845 26100 $389.40 04/07/88 R NATIONAL CAREER WORKSHOPS SEMINAR' REO1M.-l4!'TE- 02203 110-400-3302-4316 03/30/88 00106 *89. 00 7TRAININO- *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************** ************************ R NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC – PUBLICATIONS-MIRE–DEPT17037 00399 001-400-2201-4316 01/14/88 a 00106 *89. 00 $28.29 AIIIN6r *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************************************** *** R NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CTR ZIP–CODE DIRECTORIES R NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CTR -t IP–CODE-DIREC R NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CTR ZIP–CODE DIRECTORIES _.----- R NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CTR ZIP–CODE R NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CTR ZIP–CODE DIRECTORIES 02205 001-400-1201-4305 00087 —04/05188 02205 CITY rHANAGER 001-400-2101-4305 00659 02205 001-400-2201-4305 04105/88- FIRE 02205 001-400-4101-4305 00171 $28.29 $21.43 /0rFat.t OPER SUPPLIES $21.43 tOFFICE OPER SUPPLIES-- • $21.42 ?OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00187 $21.43 —?OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 02205 001-400-4201-4305 00278 NATIONAL NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CTR 02205 �_...._. –2IP-ODE DIRECTORIES– 04 UV BUILDING 001-400-4601-4305 00488 GOMPr REIsOURCE8 05282 26101 $0.00 04/07/88 17037 05322 26102 --$0. OD-- 04/07/88 - $21.43 iurr ac.t OPER SUPPLIES ------- $21.43 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES - 05268 26103 $0.00 04/07/88 05268 26103 $0.00 04/07/88 05268 26103 $0.00 04/07/88 05268 26103 $0.00 04/07/88 05268 26103 $0.00 04/07/88 05268 26103 $0.00 04/07/88 • h. • , FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 • • ITt 88 tiw ra7SA *EACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0024 FOR 04/12/88 DATE 04/07/88 t PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CTR 02205 110-400-3302-4305 00397 $21.43 05268 26103 04/03/88 PARKING trip iurrICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 04/07/88 -. - ttP-CODE-DIRECTOR IES ***VENDOR TOTAL ***************** ********e******a************* ****************** $150.00 R OCHOA & SILLAS 00095 705-400-1209-4201 00041 $810.00 60-3115 05808 26104 - ---carrnimr ABILIIT LNN /CONTNACT•SERVICEIPRIVAT $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $810.00 4. I R OLOUIN-RUTHERFORD 01917 001-210-0000-2110 02076 $175.00 47970 05100 26105 _. MORK-OUJAR-REFUND- 47970 --0373$/88 IDE -ITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************************N************** $175.00 R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 00321 001-400-2101-4304 00235 $188.30 00036 26106 --_COMPUTER_ Vsi3a/ad POLICE /TeLErhuNE *0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $138.30 R PARAMOUNT AGENCY 02195 001-400-1203-4201 00294 $132.96 118178 04491 26107 EMPLOYEE ADS - — - 18178 --03/II/W8 PEn80NNtL /LurTHACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $132.96 R PEHA & ASSOCIATES 02212 001-210-0000-2110 02071 *99.26 47909 05095 26108 - WORK-$UAR-REPUND— 47909 03/31/88 iuerCdITS/WORK 'GUARANTEE $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************►*************,M.******** $99.26 R PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CO. OF LA. 00190 001-400-1208-4305 00467 $234.83 08822105 04852 26109 -- 03/E8/88 QEnt RPPROP /urrlCE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 04/07/88 VEND 11 *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************************** **************** $234.83 R PEPSI -COLA BOTTLING COMPANY 00144 001-400-1208-4201 00424 $31.36 VEND • MACH RENT/MAY '88 - ---" _. - 04/02/88 '-'--'gEN-APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/07/88 00031 26110 :i • • FINANCE-SFA340 • ' TIME 14:30:39 ITY OF HEkM08A BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0025 FOR 04/12/88 DATE 04/07/88 PAY VENDOR NAME ' DESCRIPTION • VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ' *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************* ************** $31.36 • „ R ANDREW*PEREA 02214 001-400-4101-4316 00095 $36.68 03595 26111 - CONP EXP/CDBG CONP 03/31/88 PLANNING /INAINING -- $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL *************************************** **** L • ,.. • '1 • ?. i4 AP •i ' •I • I• R WILLIAM R. *PIDGEON. JR. ----REFUND dAt 536. 68 02192 001-300-0000-3819 00364 $850.00 53851 05615 26112 03/30/88 /.TALC SERVICES $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL *************4H1414H1********** ********** $850.00 R JUAN*PINERO 02210 110-300-0000-3302 19949 $15.00 700795 05177 26113 — ..-BITE -Pa -007 -- 03/30/88 /LORI FINES/PARKING--" $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************************** *************** R POM INCORPORATED - COIN- CART - WHEEL-- .------0a124 00223 110-400-3302-4309 00391 $15.00 $146.11 803124 05254 26114 ARG ENF ANCE MATERIALS- - - ---- -- $136.06 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************************** ************* $146.11 R PRECISION DYNAMICS CORP 02190 001-400-2101-4306 00484 $542.81 PRISONER 93579 05551 26115 POLICE FI9 180NER MAINTENANCE -$533.45 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $542.81 • R RADIOCALL CORPORATION 00102 001-400-2101-4307 00135 $70.00 PAGING SERV/APRIL- 88 ----43569 --- -O4YOt t8B POLICE R RADIOCALL CORPORATION 00102 001-400-2401-4201 PAGING SERV/APRit-88 — -43589 -- 00173 -/RADIO" MAINTENANCE $10.00 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R RED LION INN 02217 001-400-2101-4317 00084 ----------tODGZNO--ADW TR29B-- 04/07/88 *80. 00 43569 00026 26116 $0.00 04/07/88 43569 00026 26116 *0.00 04/07/88 $233.28 TR198 00198 26117 POLICE /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 04/07/88 I. • • • • .10 • • • • • • • • y • , FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 14:30:39 CITY—OF mannutiA BEAD DEMAND LIST PAGE 0026 FOR 04/12/88 DATE 04/07/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CHK • DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ***** • **** *** *233. 28 R RICH GRAPHICS INSPECT!Ott 00224 108/ 001-400-4201-4305 00279 *191.70 1250 04926 1.. 0 I ud 26118 /OFFILt OPER SUPPLIES - *191.70 04/07/88 •** VENDOR TOTAL ****** M**********w+►************w******* ********** R RICHARD*ROLOFF 02199 001-210-0000-2110 ANIMAL -TRAP -REFUND 54734 — 03/31/88 *191. 70 02079 *50.00 54734 05903 26119 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 04/07/88 e** VENDOR TOTAL **************************************** ********* *50.00 R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES ATSP E1R REVIEW 88142 01578 001-400-4202-4201 00171 111 *200.00 -1CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************HH/4r************************* *200.00 R OFCR LARRY*SAVOY _-__-M'ILEStADV-OFCR TRAININO 88142 05469 26120 *0.00 04/07/88 00628 001-400-2101-4312 00534 *62.40 05689 26121 03/16/88 POLICE /1 A APtNut . POST '--- -- *0:00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************** ******** *62. 40 R SHAMMA ELECTRIC 02189 001-400-6101-4309 00465 *1.940.00 2570 05450 26122 - ELEC- PANEL8/BCH- TOILITS- 570'- - -04/V2/88 PARKS %MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - "*1:940. 00 04/07/88 *0* VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************•******************** R JIMMIE LEE*SHAW MILES/CORR_BUPVR-CLASS -03724 *1. 940. 00 00960 001-400-2101-4313 00133 *41.08 05602 26123 ACL Ce. /TRAVEL EXPENSE. STC *0* VENDOR TOTAL************************************************•*H►***************** R SHELL OIL CO. 00320 001-400-2101-4310 00133 MI8C-PURCM/PEB 88--- 23241 03/14/88 POLICE *41. 08 *25. 60 /nu t LM FUELS AND- LUBES . ***VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************* **** *25. 60 R SIR SPEEDY 00361 001-400-2201-4309 00403 *228.78 ID DECALS/FIRE - -02/15188 FIRE - /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 04/07/88 323241 05178 26124 *0.00 04/07/88 5673 05303 26125 , *228.78 04/07/88 10 (0 01 01 ,1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 DEMAND D LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL **** r**** **** ************4HF*** ***** R SIRCHIE INC. -EVIDENCE TAPE 02186 001-400-2101-4305 44e71 03/10/88 POLICE *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************* 00660 PAGE 0027 DATE 04/07/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $228. 78 $176.70 44271 05556 26126 -OPER SUPPLIES- ------- --$185.00 04/07/89 **** $176.70 R SO BAY REG PUB COMM AUTHORITY 00112 001-400-2101-4251 00188 -4TN-$TR--ASSESSMENT03/15/88 POLICE R SO BAY REG PUB COMM AUTHORITY - - -4TH STR $29.035.20 1820 00040 26127 TKAGI SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 04/07/88 00112 001-400-2201-4251 00029 $7.258.80 1820 Iranwee /8B -7CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $36.294.00 141 - R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. - SUS -PASS S it3728 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00008 $959.00 03/10/80BUSSDY-7CONTRACT SERVICE/OOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SO -CAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY 02196 001-400-4204-4309 00886 - _ WIRE RECEPTACLE/BT —03/04/82 BLDG MAINT R SO -CAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY 02196 105-400-8202-4309 00050 MYERS CANS/ST tITES 44287 03/07/88 CIP-05--202 *959. 00 1820 00040 26127 $0.00 04/07/88 43726 05274 26128 $0.00 04/07/88 $53.25 42286 /MA INTtNANCE MATERIALS -_. 05446 26129 $0.00 04/07/88 $1.516.56 42287 05436 26129 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS" $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************* ************* $1.569.81 R SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC ANNUAL -CONTRACT -PAYMENT. 00779 001-400-4601-4201 00182 -03/22/88- COMM RESOURCES *4.000.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $4. 000. 00 R SOUTH BAY MAILING SERVICE --CABLE-TV SURVEY - 02146 001-400-1205-4201 03/18/88 CAbLE IV 04851 26130 $0.00 04/07/88 00020 $411.64 8B-7286 05249 26131 /CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT" $0.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************•******r►********************** R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 CITE SURCHARGE/MARCH-88 - 04/04/88 $411.64 110-300-0000-3302 19954 $17.685.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING 05186 26132 $0.00 04/07/88 i • i' 4114. •7 7 • 1 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME: 14:30:39 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION GITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *a* VENDOR TOTAL. *******************************************4H********* PAGE 0028 DATE 04/07/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *17, 683. 00 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT --CITATION COURT DATES 1, 00400 110-300-0000-3302 19953 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********a********** *** • 416 *184. 00 /Lawn' FINES/PARKING R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY 00162001-400-4101-4305 ----- _._._ - AT8F- EIR -03109/88 $184.00 00188 *263.69 PLANNING !OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL**************+r*********i►***a►*****w ********* r*w*-***************.*air R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO --ST SWEEP -/FEB -MAR 88 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO - ST- -SWEEP/FE'S-MAR 8* — SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO -ST--SWEEP/FEB flAR-88 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00149 *263. 69 *3. 235. 00 ST AAINTerrlNCE /.OrTrtACT SERVICE7PRIVAT 00113 001-400-6101-4201 00099 *3.328.00 7CONTRACT"SERVICE/PRIVAT 00115 110-400-3301-4201 00150 0 *4, 135. 00 PKO DIST 7CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************a**** ** ******** *10.698.00 R STATE OF CALIFORNIA 00364 001-400-2101-4231 00190 *66.00 - FINGERPRINT -SERV -MEI -88- 35239 03/16/88 POLICE !CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL ************a*************** * *********** *66.00 R HENRY L. *STATEN 00300 001-400-2401-4317 PER DIEM ADVANCE - --TRI99---- ._-b470T188- 00014 $150.00 ANIMAL CONTnuL /*CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *150.00 R KEITH D. *STORM -WORK GUAR -REFUND 43313 02211 001-210-0000-2110 02074 tw/.sa ion 05285 26133 $0.00 04/07788 57290 03591 26134 *0.00 04/07/88 00029 26135 *0.00 04/07/88 00029 26135 *0.00 04/07/88 00029 26135 *0.00 04/07/88 855239 00023 26136 *0.00 04/07/88 TR199 00199 26137 *0.00 04/07/88 *775.00 43313 /utr'USITS/WORK GUARANTEE-- ***.. *** VENDOR TOTAL****************a*a***************** **aa** R MARJANA*TERZIC WORK GUAR REFUND-.. - *775. 00 05098 26138 *0.00 04/07/88 02201 001-210-0000-2110 02077 *775.00 47975 05901 -47975--.-- —V3131-188- /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 26139 04/07/88 CITY OF /MIMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 14:30:39 FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0029 DATE 04/07/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * -i DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ** t****1 *e*****u*u**************** ***** *** *775. 00 R THERMO COMBUSTION INNOVATORS 02182 001-400-2101-4309 00132 *100.00 2030 05589 26140 -- BURN- CONTRA---037?bi88 rui-LCE mAINTENANCE MATERIALS -- "-"--- -*100.00 04/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************* ********* *100.00 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 001-400-4204-4309 00885 *152.06 815786 05477 26141 WATER 11EATER> 5786 03708/ BLDG uAINT -7MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************* ************** $152.06 R CITY OF*TORRANCE - ----- - - AREA -O-DI8A5TER 00841 001-400-2701-4251 00013 *0.00 04/07/88 $1.167.09 35303 05619 26142 LONIRACT SERVICE/GOv' *0.00 04/07/88 rr *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************** .14 R OFCR TIMOTHY R.*TUREK DUI --SEMINAR- EXPENSE *1.167.09 01830 001-400-2101-4312 00537 *158.25 05609 26143 PuLICE ,TRAvEL -EXPENSE . POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *158.25 R U.S. MEDICAL - LAX --- -PRE-EMP- PHYSICALS 02194 001-400-1203-4320 00186 U.S. MEDICAL - LAX PRE -EMP PHVS ICAL- 8------ 59650- 02194 001-400-1203-4320 *183.00 0rr.WT EXAMS R 00187 *832.00 7PRE=EMPLOYMENT EXAMS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIF. 02202 001-400-2101-4312 00526 - TUtTION/J.---MERIUS- I" 4.0 IW 03/24/88 *1.015.00 $233.00 POLICE -/TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *233.00 R ROBERT H.*WAGSTAFF *0.00 04/07/88 CT59650 05803 26144 *0.00 04/07/88 CT059650 04492 26144 -" *0.00 04/07/88 05604 26145 *0.00 04/07/88 02208 110-300-0000-3302 19951 *15.00 618326 05183 26146 -C-iTE-PAYMENT- 03730788 /COURT-WINES/PARK/NG *0.00 04/07/88 441. 40 - 1 I'i • , FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 GIT? OF ht,nO8A BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0030 • DATE 04/07/88 1.1 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK M °i� DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ** ** *15.00 • �„ OFCR JAMES*WHIPKEY —MILEStADV OFCR TRNO 00553 001-400-2101-4312 00533 03/16/80 POLICE *43. 68 ITRAVEL EXPENSE .-POST--- *** POST-- *** VENDOR TOTAL *************************** *ww****************** *43. 68 • N 0 R SALLY A. *WHITE SEC 8ERV/3-15-88 00140 001-400-4102-4201 00142 *277.50 COnH /CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL *************f*********•a•**** **************************** R CAROL*WIRTH - - ANfMAt 02197 001-210-0000-2110 02081 *277. 50 05693 26147 *0.00 04/07/88 03594 26148 *0.00 04/07/88 *50.00 55532 05905 26149 /DEPOSITS/WORK-GUARANTEE *0.00 04/07/88 --- *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************** *************** R STEVE*WISNIEWSKI 01364 001-400-2101-4316 00203 - MON £XP/JAN-MA11-80•'- - - *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************w**** ***************•** * R PAUL *WOLCOTT • ; I,1 R XEROX CORPORATION MILES/SFTY--FL-D -TACTICS *50. 00 461.95 05592 26150 40.00 04/07/88 *61.95 00129 001-400-2101-4312 00532 *114.40 03/16/88 /TRAVEL EXPENSE ; POST *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************* ******************************* *114. 40 II 1•1., • I 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00068 *943.72 LEASE PMT/APRIL 88 ---22290 - x/02/88 R XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/APRIL 00 12546 R XEROX CORPORATION - -LEASE-PMTIAPR!L 00 12543 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 00135 —DEN APPROP 1LEASE PAYMENTS 001-400-1208-6900 .a, 001-400-2201-6900 00069 *321.08 PLEASE PAYMENTS 00033 05688 26151 *0.00 04/07/88 518912190 00048 26152 *0.00 04/07/88 518912546 00049 26152 *0.00 04/07/88 447.62 518912543 00053 26152 tt PArntNTS- *0:-00 04/07/88 00135 001-400-2401-6900 00006 *56.15 - - LEASE PMT /APRIL-- -. --12544_ .-04102/88 -ANIMAL—CONTROL --/LEASE"" PAYMENTS 518912544 00051 26152 *0.00 04/07/88 :• 11 4 /4 11 21 '4 It 24 If 41 4/ 41 111 4/ 44 SO 41 I/ 44 34 FINANCE -SFA340 TIME 14:30:39 CI OF MEkhOwA BEAU! DEMAND LIST FOR 04/12/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R XEROX CORPORATION - -LEASE-PPITtAPRI R XEROX CORPORATION -LEA9P/fttL 68 00135 001-400-4601-6900 00007 04/02/88 Cumn RESOURCES 00135 110-400-3302-6900 00074 04/02/88 PARAINGENF PAGE 0031 DATE 04/07/88 INV/REF PO it CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *181.72 5189124545 00052 7tEASE PAYMENTS 1110. 00 *114.00 518912544 00051 ,LEAum PAYmeNTd 10.00 *II* VENDOR TOTAL. *1.664.29 *** PAY CODE TOTAL ****************************************************************** *186.241.97 *** TOTAL. WARRANTS ****************************************************************** *250. 305. 72 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE w ILASIGU ON -P WARRANT REGISTER FOR AHD LIN AR LADLE FOR PAYM FINANCE NMI TOR 'LTC 1/7 26152 04/07/88 26152 04/07/88 CLAIMS COVERED RV' LtiSNEoFtiir' ARE ALCultoitE "1 - THEiti-OF: sr • IV '1;!., _ 4, • 44 4. 411 44 4. 31 14 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council April 4, 1988 City Council Meeting of April 12, 1988 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE FOLIC .PEPOSITB_, FO8 ,HERM9$A_BBACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of March 1988. Respectfully submitted, Gary Br tsch City Treasurer NOTED: 7 Kevin Northcra City Manager INSTITUTION ,. INVESTMENT REPORT - MARCH 1988 TOTAL... _ . _.. . QATE OF .INVESTMENT A E BALANCE 2/29/88 Withdrawal Investment Withdrawal Balance 3/31/88 $4,095,000.00 (325.000.00) 150.000.00 (400,000.00) *3,520,000.00 American_Sayings_& Loan Investment $ 100,000.00 County Savings. Bank Investment $ 100,000.00 Farmers Sayings Investment $ 99,000.00 California. Federal SA i. Investment $ 100,000.00 First,_CalifQrnia. Fg0t. S_ &,L Investment Long Beach_S_&,. Investment $rookside_S_&_L Investment $ 99,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 99,000.00 10/21/87 12/23/87 3/23/88 12/28/87 1/6/88 1/6/88 1/13/88 DATE. OF_MATUBITY.. 3/4/88 3/8/88 3/17/88 4/18/88 1/6/89 10/3/88 6/31/88 1/6/89 1/6/89 1/12/89 ,INTEREST 8.05% 8.25% 8.375% 7.75% 8.15% 9.0% 8.5% 8.5% Cal Awerican Savings Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.75% Perpetual_$evings Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.75% Pacific_Sayings Bank Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.85% Beyerly_H111 4 _$, & L Investment $ 99,000.00 1/15/88 1/17/89 9.15% Horth_ _America S &. L Investment $ 99,000.00 2/4/88 2/2/89 8.50% Founders S & L Investment $ 99,000.00 2/4/88 2/3/89 8.625% Westwood,$ & L Investment $ 99,000.00 2/5/88 2/3/89 8.50% American_ Divers. Save._Bank Investment $ 99,000.00 2/9/88 2/8/89 8.25% Butter 'iel4 , S_ & L Investment $ 99,000.00 2/18/88 2/22/89 8.20% GQlder)_Gate Bank Investment $ 99,000.00 2/24/88 2/23/89 8.0% Huntington S_& L Investment $ 99,000.00 2/25/88 2/24/89 7.85% ColuMbie S & L Investment $ 99,000.00 3/3/88 2/27/89 7.4$ yestern,_Federal Investment $ 400,000.00 3/31/88 3/17/89 7.75% FHLMC Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Investment Investment TOTAL BALANCE $ 248,733.64 3/26/87 3/1/17 $ 249,320.88 5/26/87 8/2/16 $6,343,454,52 Respectfully Submitted, 6b1 '5/2,4/%4 Gary Bruth City Treasurer 8.0% 9.50% Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council March 21, 1988 For the Meeting of April 12, 1988 CANCELLATION OF WARRANTS Please Consider the following request for cancellation of the warrant listed below. 1025319 - Center for Criminal Justice Research and Training - $234.00. Account Number 001-400-2101-4312. Officer Kelly was unable to attend class. 1025361 - William Kelly - $36.25. Account Number 001-400- 2101-4312. Officer Kelly was unable to attend class. #025844 - Boise Cascade Office Products - 998.31. Account Number - 001-400-1208-4201 $551.11, 110-400-3301-4201 $447.20. Warrant issued to wrong vendor in error. 1025900 - Hewlett Packard Co. - $562.44. Account Number - 001-400-1206-4316 $375.00, 001-400-1206-4305 $187.44. Warrant issued to wrong vendor in error. 1025918 - H. Longacre - $1,215.00. Account Number - 001-300- 0000-3813. Project not cancelled. 1025947 - Rancho Santiago Comm. College - $29.00. Account Number - 001-400-2101-4312. Purchase order issued for incorrect amount. Concur: kevinNorthcra City Manager ary Brut ch City Treasurer lh March 29, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council April 12, 1988 RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE SUMMARY OF THE 6TH CATV BOARD MEETING OF MARCH 21, 1988, AND ACCEPT THE VACANCY CREATED THEREIN, WITHOUT FILLING THAT VACANCY Recommendation: (1) To receive and file summary, and (2) acknowledge the vacancy created on the CATV Board due to the absences of C. Evan Wright. The Board also requests that the Council not appoint another to fill that vacancy, thereby having the Board consist of only seven (7) members. Background: At your regularly scheduled meeting of August 11, 1987, Council approved staff's recommendation to appoint a Cable TV Board. Subsequently, at your regularly scheduled meeting of October 27, 1987, Council approved the appointment of all twelve (12) applicants applying, to the Board. Since its first meeting on November 30, 1987, the Board has lost five (5) appointees. The CATV Board at their scheduled meeting of March 21, 1988, took action to declare a vacancy on the Board, due to the unexcused absences of C. Evan Wright, as provided in the by-law adopted at their meeting of January 18, 1988. "Three (3) absences from regular meetings of any Board member within one (1) calendar year period creates an automatic vacancy on said Board unless excused from such attendance by the consent of the Chairman prior to the meeting, expressed by an action on the record. The Secretary of the Board, shall thereupon promptly notify the City Council and any such member of that fact, whereupon the vacancy shall remain vacant." (see attached summary of January 18th meeting, "Motion redefined", page 2) Analysis: This Board member, due to conflicting work scheduling, has been unable to attend three (3) scheduled meetings since the adoption of the by-law governing excused absences. The vacancy created by declaration and action taken by the Board, if accepted by the Council and not filled, shall reduce the number of Board members to seven (7). 1 Alternatives: 1. Fill the vacancy created by asking for additional applicants. (all twelve (12) original applicants were appointed) CONCUR: an Noon, General Services Director evin Northcraft, City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted, Joan Noon, General Services Director By c?). Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide Staff Liaison, CATV Board 4. SUMMARY OF 4TH MEETING CABLE TV BOARD January 18, 1988 The meeting was convened at 1938 hours by Dr. Schubert. Present were: Dr. Roy Schubert Christopher Rowe (1) Scott Rosenberg Robert Fleck (1) Stephen Gach (1) Absent were: Evan Wright (2) Sylvia Barton (3) Barbara Jean Holland (3) John McIntyre (3) Charlotte Malone (2) Susan Hay Jane Allison arrived at 2040 hours. • Chair Schubert stated that he believed there was a quorum present of five, pending the acceptance by the Council of the resigna- tions of Susan Hay and Barbara Jean Holland. He asked that staff present the resignations to Council at their meeting of January 26, 1988, and to advise the Council that the Board does not want them to reappoint replacements. Motion by Scott to adopt a set of by-laws, by which the CATV Board operate henceforth. Second by Chair Schubert. He asked for suggestions. Staff read from Robert's Rules, page 295, 1st paragraph, "Proceedings in the absence of a Quorum'. Chair Schu- bert said that he was declaring they have a quorum, as it is a question of opinion whether there is a quorum. Staff referred to Section 2-2.14 HBMC, "Rules of Order". Chair Schubert again de- clared that the Board had a quorum and asked Staff to present to the Council the resignations of Ms. Hay and Ms. Holland, asking that the Council not appoint replacements, and that the actions of this meeting depend upon the acceptance of the resignations by Council. Motion by Scott to adopt as theirs, the by-laws of the Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach. Second by Chair Schubert. Discussion regarding the content of the by-laws, what constitutes "excused" absences. Reference to HBMC by staff. All ayes. Motion by Robert to adopt a modification of the Planning Commis- sion by-laws, whereby a Board member may have an unlimited number of excused absences, excused absences meaning that the if the Chairman is notified at anytime before the commencement of the meeting, then it shall be at the discretion of the Chairman to declare it an execused absence. Second by Scott. All ayes. Status report from Chair Schubert on the Council's approval of the survey last week. Chris Rowe offered to put the survey on his Macintosh. The order of the questions changed: #9=#1, #10=#2, #11=#3, #1244, #145, #248, #347, #448, #5=#9, #6410, #7=#11, #8=#12, #13 on status quo. Finalized format of question #12. Scott to detail arrangements with M.L. Media. Christopher to finalize survey. Jane Allison arrived at 2040 hours. Staff to check on the availiblity of the paper through the City, and the cost. Motion by Scott to adjourn, reconvene, pass the two motions passed earlier with reference to the by-laws now that there is a formal quorum. Second by Robert. Scott, Chris, Robert, Stephen, Chairman Schubert, all ayes. Meeting reconvened at 2042 hrs. Present: Schubert, Gach, Rosen- berg, Rowe, Allison and Fleck. Motion by Scott to adopt as their by-laws, the by-laws of the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, with the added provision that, members of the CATV Board may have an unlimited amount of absences so long as those absences have been excused by the Chairman of the Board, at his discretion. The Chairman of the Board, at his discretion, may terminate the appointment of any member, who in the judgment of Chairman has been absent in excess of three (3) times, unexcused. Second Gach. Motion redefined. Three (3) absences from regular meetings of any Board member within one (1) calendar year period creates an automatic vacancy on said Board unless excused from such atten- dance by the consent of the Chairman prior to the meeting, ex- pressed by an action on the record. The Secretary of the Board, shall thereupon promptly notify the City Council and any such member of that fact, whereupon the vacancy shall remain vacant. Second Gach All ayes. Motion by Rosenberg, to appoint Staff Liaison as the non-voting Secretary of the CATV Board, and that the CATV Board summary be attached to the General Services monthly activity report. Second Allison. All ayes. Motion by Rosenberg, to have the Secretary send to Bert at M.L. Media, a copy of the Boards agenda, and summary. Second Gach. No objections. Scott to provide Chairman Schubert with better copies of part 76 FCC. Staff to forward to Chairman Schubert and Scott copies of the progress report sent out to the Board members, but not received by them. Motion by Chair Schubert to settle on two methods to get the sur- vey mailed. Either M.L. to process, mail etc. if they will, or use the City's envelope with the survey inside. Second Gach. All ayes. Next meeting February 8, 1988. Staff to get a copy of the Planning Commission by-laws. Motion from Jane, to start the counting of unexcused absences effective this meeting. Second Rosenberg. All ayes. Motion by Jane, to adjourn. Second Schubert. Meeting adjourned at 2125 hrs. Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide Staff Liaison CATV Board (3) Summary of 6th Meeting of CATV Board March 21, 1988 Chairman Schubert called the meeting to order at 7:15 pm. Present were: Dr. Schubert Scott Rosenberg Stephen Gach Charlotte Malone (1) Robert Fleck Jane Allison (Chris Rowe arrived at 8:30) Absent: C. Evan Wright (3) Vacancy created. Discussion re: Consultant No recommendation unless and until decided by the Board. Survey response: Mailing service billed us for 6351 pieces produced. Post office billed us for 5834 pieces mailed. To date 1409 surveys returned to City Hall. Breakdown by area (per map attached) to date. Area Subscribers Returned /o of area #1 1764 414 23.57 #2 1029 381 37% #3 1328 201 15.1% #4 1273 357 287 #5 667 160 24% #6 360 92 25.67 Motion by Rosenberg to give the City 100 blank questionaires for their use, to provide to the citizens of Hermosa Beach that request them, who didn't receive copies of it, the City should mark on each one of these questionaires void or something [of that nature], and the rest of them destroyed or shredded. Second by Malone. Gach, Rosenberg, Malone, Fleck, Allison and Schubert, all Ayes. So ordered. Staff to handled the saving and the destruction (shredding). Those surveys with out of city/state addresses not mailed, to be saved for reference. Assignments to collect bids for processing survey responses: Allison to contact her neighbor who does data entry work; Chris Rowe to check with his secretary; Staff to check with Data Processing services; Dr. Schubert to contact High Schools. r SUPPLEMEN E ML INFORMATION - 1 - Motion by Allison to agree to have the data from the surveys entered into a computer, using the form that Dr. Schubert created or an equivalent form based on another different type of computer system, which will allow us to compile the graphs and compare them with each other and create bar graphs and other presentational aides. Motion to amend by Rosenberg to present this to Ms. Noon for approval, contingent upon approval of the money by the City. Second Malone. Gach, Rosenberg, Malone, Fleck, Allison, Dr. Schubert, all Ayes. So ordered. Motion by Dr. Schubert to drop C. Evan Wright, declaring a vacancy on the Board, for excessive absences (reference by-law adopted by the Board at their scheduled meeting of January 18, 1988). Staff to write a letter to Mr. Wright. Date set for next meeting: April 11, 1988 at 7:00 pm. Meeting adjourned at 8:45 pm. Michele D. Tercero Administrative Aide Staff Liaison CATV Board 2 ' \)c t.cxr ore. l�z.t cxtY 10.911.•C.44 reo.cc r� »xro. ra ..ct..crtc2' 010,11.4(0.9.4 29e1.4C.,V t voPrAr?cuz n' s.r.zr a .erz� red reiea'a'x 4- 7- 4.-0444,-v Cy7.CL..V'T "4".R�C✓=lP �1 1 rOr-4a?)) o>s� izs MAP INDEX -A- Aviation Blvd C4, 03, 04 Amby Place A2 Ardmore Avenue.. A2, 82.83, C3. 03,E3, F3, A. 82.3, C, 0, E. F, G Artesia Blvd 83, 84 Aubrey Court 03 Ave Avenue C3 -B- Bard Street 03 Barney Court E4 Bay View Drive.C2, 02. D3, E3, F3, CD2. DEF3 Beach Drive 82, C2 Bonnie Brae Street C4, 04 Borden Avenue 83 Boundary Place A2, A3 Braeholm Place A2 -c- Campana Street C4 Circle Drive C2 Circle Court C2 Corona Street C4, 04 Culper Court E3, F3 Cypress Avenue 03, E3 -E- Eighteenth Court C2 Eighteenth Street C2 Eighth Court E2 Eighth Place 01, 04 Eighth Street E2, E3, 04 -L- Eleventh Court D2 La Carlita Place A3 Eleventh Place 04 Loma Drive D3, E3 Eleventh Street 02, 03, D4 Longfellow Avenue .A2, A3 El Oesta A3. 83 Longfellow Place A2, A3 F- Lyndon Street F3 Fifteenth Court D2 -M- Fifteenth Place C3, C4 Manhattan Avenue. B2, C2. 02, Fifteenth Street .... 02, C3, C4 03, E3, F3, 8CO2, DEF3 Fifth Court E2 Manila A3 Fifth Street E2, E3, E4 Massey Avenue E4 First Place F3, F4, E4 Meyer Court E4, F4 First Street F3, F4, E4 Mira Street C3 Fourteenth Court D2 MontMontgrey Blvd. omery C2 03,3. E3 04 Fourteenth Street ..D2, 03, C4 9oery Orlve Fourth Court F3 Morningside Drive ' A2, B2 B2 Fourth Street E2, E3, E4 Myrtle Avenue N- 2 -G- Gentry Street E4 Neptune Avenue Al Golden Avenue C4 Nineteenth Court C2 Gould Avenue B2, A2, B3 Nineteenth Street ..C2, C3, E2C4 Gould Terrace A2, A3 Ninth Court Gravely Court E4 Ninth Street -O- -ND3, 04, E2 Greenwich Village 82 Ocean Drive C4, 04 - E4 Harper Avenue 84, C4, D4 Ocean View Avenue 04 Hermosa Avenue.. B2, C2, D2, E2 Owosso Avenue 82 E3, F3, BCDE2, E2.3, F3 Ozone Court P - Hermosa View Drive A2 Herondo Street F3, F4 'Pacific CO3st Hwy.. A3, 83, C3, Highland Avenue 'Al 03. E3, E4, F4, ACOE3, EF4 Hill Street F3 Palm Drive.. B2, C2, 02, E3, F3, Hillcrest Drive 83, C3 8CO2, EF3 n9 -R- Raymond Avenue Rhodes Street 83, C3 Thirty-third Place -S- Thirty-third Street Second Street F3, E4 Twelfth Court Seventeenth Court Seventeenth Street C2 Seventh Court E2 Seventh Place E4 Seventh Street.. E2, E3, E4, 04, E2.3, 0E4 Silver Strand C4 Silver Street C4 Sllverslrand Avenue 82 Sixteenth Court 02 Sixteenth Street. 02, C2, C3 Sixth Court E2 Sixth Street E2, E3, E4 Springfield Avenue C3 Strand ..A1, 131, 82, C2, 02, E2, F3, AB1, BC2 Sunset Drive 03, E3 Tennyson Place A3 -T- Tennyson Place A3 Tenth Court E2 Tenth Street 02, D3, 04 Third Court F3 Third Street F3, E3 Thirteenth Court D2 Thirteenth Street... D2, D3, D4 Thirtieth Place A2 Thirtieth Street A2 Thi' .. WI., f•"''.. Al Thirty-fourth Street.... A1, A2 Twenty-ninth Court .... 82. C3 Thirty-second Place A2, Twenty-ninth Street Al, A2 Twenty-second Court Al, A2 Twenty-second Street 02 Twenty-seventh Court C2 Twerityseventh Street ..82, Twentieth Place 83, 84 Twenty-sixth Court Twentieth Street ...C2, C3, 84 Twenty-sixth Street -.82, Twenty-eighth Court ...B2, A2 Twenty-third Street Twenty-eighth Street...82, A2 Twenty-fifth Street 82 Valley Drive ... .A2. B2, 83, i Twenty-first Court C2 D3, E3, F3, A82, BCDE Twenty-first Street ..C2, C3, 83 Valley Park Avenue Twenty-fourth Place 83 Twenty-fourth Street...82, 83 C2 Twentieth Court EMERGENCY NUMBERS Police Department 376-94 Fire Department 372-21 Paramedics 372-21 Lifeguards 372-21 Ambulance 545-65 South Bay Hospital 514 South Prospect Avenue Redondo Beach 376-9474 (24 hour emergency services) Produced By: Beach Cities Newspapers Design: Larry Satady Color PholograohyrEdlling: Gro] Lallme, Social Vocational Servic 250 Pacific Coast Hwy. Hermosa Beach 376-8055 April 6, 1988 City Council Meeting April 12, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES The following claim(s) have been submitted to the City Clerk's office: John Zertuche, 11115 Acame Street #2, N. Hollywood, CA represented by Fred L. Wright, Attorney at Law, 1515 Crenshaw Boulevard, Torrance, CA 90501, filed March 23, 1988. Recommendation: To deny claim(s) and refer to City's Claims Note: The above claim(s) are available for of the City Clerk. Concur: f" IN N . N.RT: '.'T City Manager 1 Administrator. review in the office RAT L ENIDSTORRJ, it erk 412 MAIL TO: City Clerk • City of TOOSI OOX HERMOSA BEACH 2031X1tt SIX9d. 116141616, California 90503 gg CITY OF VOREMIRCEHERMOS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES To Person or Property 1 Claims for death, injury to person or to personal property must be filed not later than 100 days after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 9112) 2. Clams for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year after the occur- rence. (Gov. Code Sec. 9112) 3. Read entire claim form before filing. 4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. 7AHN 7.RRTIt HF. Name of Claimant (type or print) Age 11115 Acame St.. 82. N. Hollwyood, CA 91602 29 Home Address of Claimant City State Zip Telephone Give address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: c/o Fred L. Wright, Attorney at Law, 1515 Crenshaw Blvd., Torrance, CA90501 Date of Accident: 2/24/88 (month, (day) (year) Time: 12 Midnight PM Place of Accident (be specific : Pier Ave/Pacific (Reserve for Filing Stamp) BEACH 4 0 4J 145 Coast Highway How did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars. I was beaten by male offices by fists and night stick. I was falsely arrested for Section 647F PC, drunk in public. My constitutional rights to freedom of movement and bodily integrity were deprived under color of state law, 42 U.S.C.S1983 Ware Police at sane? Yes$1C No0 Police Report No, 88-0864 Whet particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? Give names of City employees causing the injury or damage if known: Officers Kearin and Kindall arrested me on the false charge of 647F PC. The male officer hit me with his baton several times and with his fists, without provocation or justification. Give total amount of claim. (Include estimated amount of any prospective injury or damage). unknown at this time How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor bill, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.): PLEASE ATTACH TWO ESTIMATES and PHOTOGRAPHS, if available. $35 — LA Co/USC Er List name and addresses of witnesses, doctors and hospitals: LA County, USC HOpsital, emergency room •PLEASE SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE CLAIM NO. 4 Insurance payments, if any, and names of all Insurance Companies with which you are presently insured and type of policy: Expenditures made on account of accident or injury: DATE ITEM AMOUNT READ CAREFULLY For ell accident claims place on following diagram names of streets, including North. East, South, and West indicate place of accident by "X" and by showing house numbers or distances to street corners. If City vehicle was involved. designate by letter "A" location of City vehicle when you first saw it, and by "B" location of yourself or your vehide when you first saw City vehicle: location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A-1" and location of yourself or your vehide at the time of the accident by "13-1" and the point of impact by "X.!'• NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant. FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS -J 1 / / I U L ZL,\ /1 I f FOR OTHER ACCIDENTS CLAIMS MUST BE FILED WITH CITY CLERK • (Cal. Gove. Code Sec. 915a) ORIGINAL (white) to City Clerk DUPLICATE (green) for Claimant's file SIDEWALK PARKWAY SIDEWALK I have read the foregoing claim and know the contents thereof; and I certify that the same is true of my own knowledge except as to those matters which are herein stated upon my information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: 3 el signed C NOTE: Presentation of a false clainC4 a felony (CaI.Pen.Code Sec. 721 April 4, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1988 APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE REPAIR CIP 85-160, FY 87-88 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. approve the plans and specifications for CIP 85-160, Concrete Street Repair. 2. authorize staff to advertise for bids and issue addenda as necessary. Background: At the June 23, 1987, City Council meeting, Council adopted the FY 87-88 CIP Budget, which appropriated $60,000 for concrete street repairs and installing a new sidewalk at Greenwood Park on Aviation Blvd. The Department of Public Works conducted a field survey to determine the streets requiring repairs. The engineer's estimate (Exhibit A) was developed from the field survey and unit prices. A construction schedule (Exhibit C) was developed to provide a time frame for funding. A map of work locations (Exhibit D) identifies the areas to be removed and replaced and the new sidewalk at Greenwood Park. Specifications are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Analysis: Staff has determined that this project is ready to go out for bid. The funds available will be used to remove and replace deteriorated portions of concrete streets in various locations throughout the City and to install new sidewalk at Greenwood Park. The cost comparison for removing and replacing concrete versus an asphalt overlay for portions of 1st Street and 5th Street (Exhibit B) estimates a $658 savings for the asphalt overlay. The locations identified for concrete repair on these two streets shall be left in the scope of work in the Request for Proposal with the stipulation that the City reserves the right to delete these work items at a later date. Staff will request a price from the awardee of the asphalt street repair contract (CIP 87-171), to determine if an asphalt overlay on 1st and 5th Streets is economically feasible. An asphalt overlay would provide a smoother driving surface and reduce noise levels. lk Fiscal Impact: Budgeted Amount Amount Expended CIP 85-160 FY 87-88 $60,000 -0- Total Available Funds Engineer's Estimate (including 1st and 5th Street) (excluding 1st and 5th Street) The Engineer's Estimate exceeds the budgeted amount, funding may be necessary. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available are: 1. modify the scope of work, or 2. drop the project. Respectfully submitted, Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer Concur: evin B. Northcrif City Manager Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E conrep/v BG:mv Concur: Balance $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 68,095 $ 32,845 and additional to City Council Anthony Antich Director of Pudic Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Engineer's Estimate - Cost Comparison of Concrete Repair vs. Asphalt Overlay - Map of Work Locations Construction Schedule - Copy of CIP 85-160 Budget (FY 87-88) 2 CONCRETE STREET REPAIR . CIP 85-160 FY 87-88 LOCATIONS TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED LOCATION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 1st St. @ PCH (E. side) 1st St., -150' E. of PCH 1st St., -200' E. of PCH 834 1st St. 904 1st St. 908 1st St. 930 1st St. 835 4th St. (just W. of Ocean View) 402 Ocean View 615 5th St. 670 5th St. 726 5th St. 940 5th St. 940 6th St. 1022 6th St. 1032 6th St. 711 Prospect (just N. of 7th) 1102 7th St. 1158 8th St. EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE DIM. 11.5 x 56 3 x 5 11.5 x 20 7 x 15 4.5 x 7 6 x 6 7.5 x 15 24.5 x 47 16.5 x 24 20 x 24.5 3.5 x 4 2 x 4.5 8 x 10 15.5 x 85 25.5 x 35 13 x 27.5 8 x 18 8 x 10 5.5 x 11 14 x 14.5 3 x 6 8 x 10 5 x 7 SQ.FT. 644 280 180 1152 396 490 14 9 80 1318 893 358 144 80 61 203 18 80 35 CONCRETE STREET REPAIR CIP 85-160 FY 87-88 LOCATIONS TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED LOCATION EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE DIM. SQ.FT. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 1209 - 1221 8th St. 730 8th P1. (utility cut) 912 8th P1. 1032 8th P1. 636 9th St. 710 9th St. 854 9th St. 1125 9th St. 1144 9th St. 1157 9th St. .650 10th St. 1501 Golden 1507 Golden 1212 15th St. (@ Golden) 1540 Silver (@ end of street) 977 16th St. (utility cut) 921 16th St. 2022 Springfield (utility cut) 631 Longfellow 635 Longfellow (utility cut) 2 x 56 1.5 x 29 6.5 x 11.5 3.5 x 5 20 x 62 20 x 35 10.5 x 32 7 x 8 2.5 x 24.5 3 x 5 3 x 10 6 x 10 4 x 9 2 x 7.5 7 x 11.5 9 x 9 8.5 x 8.5 2 x 12 1.5 x 6 2 x 10.5 1.5 x 30 4 x 6 112 44 75 18 1240 700 336 56 61 15 30 96 15 81 153 24 9 21 45 24 CONCRETE STREET REPAIR CIP 85-160 FY 87-88 LOCATIONS TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. LOCATION EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE DIM. Morningside @ 27th Ct. 27th Ct. (just E. of Ozone Ct.) 29th Ct. (just E. of Morningside) 260 29th Ct. 318 29th Ct. 30th P1. (just W. of Ingleside) CATV 421 31st Pl. (just E. of Morningside) CATV 441 31st P1. 32nd P1. @ Ingleside 350 33rd P1. 3303 Morningside Morningside @ 33rd P1. 424 33rd St. 352 34th St. (@ Morningside) 212 35th St. 6 x 11 6 x 20 4 x 14 2.5 x 7 5 x 10 3 x 14 3.5 x 4 9 x 10 9.5 x 10.5 3.5 x 4.5 4 x 5 4.5 x 4.5 15 x 16 5 x 7.5 2.5 x 5 2.5 x 6 5 x 19 2.5 x 2.5 4 x 11.5 SQ.FT. 66 120 56 18 50 42 14 90 100 16 40 278 123 6 46 TOTAL 10,649 10,649 square feet @ 8 inches thick equals 263 cubic yards of concrete. 263 cubic yards at $250 per cubic yard equals $65,750. * Items 1 - 7 and 10 - 12 (1st St. and 2nd St.) may be deleted from the scope of work. CONCRETE STREET REPAIR CIP 85-160 FY 87-88 NEW SIDEWALK at Greenwood Park on Aviation (Location No. 55 on map) Width = 5 feet Depth = 4 inches Length = 152 feet Number of cubic yards concrete = 9.38 EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 9.38 cubic yards at $250 per cubic yards = $2,345 SUMMARY Including* Excluding* 1st and 5th 1st and 5th Streets Streets REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE: $65,750 $30,500 NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK: $2,345 $2,345 TOTAL ESTIMATE $68,095 $32,845 * Those portions of 1st Street and 5th Street considered for an asphalt overlay, items 1 - 7 and 10 -12, respectively. CONCRETE STREET REPAIR CIP 85-160 FY 87-88 EXHIBIT B COST COMPARISON CONCRETE REPAIR vs. ASPHALT OVERLAY CONCRETE REPAIR 1st Street Limits: from PCH to Prospect Sq. ft. Repair Locations 8PCH (E. side) 644 Approx. 150 ft. E. of PCH 280 Approx. 200 ft. E. of PCH 180 834 1st St. 1152 904 1st St. 396 908 1st St. 490 930 1st St. 14 Total square feet Cost " (based on $250 per cubic yard) 5th Street Limits: Ardmore to PCH 3156 $19,473 Sq. ft. Repair Locations 615 5th St. 1318 670 5th St. 893 726 5th St. 358 Total square feet 2569 Cost $15,851 Total cost of concrete repair = $35,323 Street 1st Street 5th Street Totals ASPHALT OVERLAY Width (ft.) 29.50 28.20 Length 1 Area (ft.) I(sq.ft.) 444 1 13,098 378 1 10,660 822 23,758 Total Cost $18,836 $15,829 $34,665 23,758 square feet divided by 164 square feet for 1 inch of coverage times 2 inches equals 290 tons of asphalt. Items 1 Units Quantity 1 Unit Total of Work 1 Cost Cost _---� 1===== —1 Grinding ILin. Ft. 1 1644 1 15.00 $24,660 1 1 1 Asphalt ( Ton 1 290 1 34.50 $10,005 Overlay I 1 COST SAVINGS OF ASPHALT OVERLAY VERSUS CONCRETE REPAIR = Total cost of overlay: $34,665 $658 EXHIBIT C MAP OF WORK LOCATIONS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIEFOIRNIIA PARKING Lot" EXHIBIT C MAP OF WORK LOCATIONS GREENWOOD PARK Rai Elfc. \ .9 Box SPAINKI.ER,C 4..p� HEAD �\ o O ��o\p " TRAFFIC -/"''.a. . SIGNAL 80)E1 • -f. SPKINK6ER HFAOS —............\ plictH — VaL1ACrE 30% f p rot -6 TRAFFIC SIGNAL. Box PACING coAst HIGHWAY Nor TO SCAL4 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE . PROJECT NAME t CI P . g7- I6O • LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE i te, trU — A tea -con c ri REPAJRs EXHIBIT D ACCOUNT NUMBER i ACTUAL SCHEDULE s gimmommommi X : 100% COMPLETE y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 I TASKS 1 JAN 1 FEB 1 MAR 1 APR 1 MAY I JUN 1 JUL 1 AUG 1 SEP I. OCT 1 NOV t DEC I Final design approval before advertising for construction (1 111111 I I Prepare advertisement & set bid opening) 1)111111 - date I. I 1 1111 i 1------ I---«- I I 1 I I 1 Advertising period (issue addendums as necessary) 1 I I--fI11T 1 1.-+`--I 1 I I I I ------I Accept sealed bids & public bid opening 1 1 1 I111� 1 1 1 1 I------1 Review bids 1 1Ilya 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 I Award contract 1 1 7yIIF 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ''I Sign contract (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) 1 II I I I I 1 I. I Preconstruction meeting procedure 1 I 111111 1 1 1-----1 1 1 1 1 Issue "Notice to Proceed" 1 1 I-iirm`rnr ' 1 1 1 I 1- •I Construction Period' I II'jiilii��liTff*-I-----I I ' I I I I • Monitor progress & maintain records l ll I I 1 1111111111111H I I 1 1 1 I' I I I ------I I-JTiilT11C I I I i 1 Acceptance of work as complete 1 1 I I I-- :1111111 ---I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I .11111111 I I I- --j-- I I Retention Payment 1------I I I 1i1111111111111111111fl1T-1 1 1 I I -1------I------I---7-1 I I I ------I I I I I J Progress payment and change order procedure Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" Project close out • 1 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU FY88-89 SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER: PROGRAM AREA: Roadway Improvements & Appurtenances CIP 85-160 115-401-8160-4201 Street & Safety Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: WORK PROPOSED: This on-going CIP provides for: - Installation of new sidewalks and replacement of deteriorated sidewalk - Replacement of street signs - Work in public right-of-way such as bench maintenance•tree removal and planting, etc. A majority of FY87-88 work will concentrate on concrete repairs Citywide. This CIP also includes sidewalk installation on Aviation adjacent to Greenwood Park. BUDGET SCHEDULE Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 .Col 6 Col 7 EXPENDED EST'ED PROJECT ELEMENTS BUDGET THRU THRU FY86-872/28/876/30/87 1 1 1 1 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 1 1 1 1 PLANS. SPECS & ESTIMATES 1 1 I 1 16000( •_ 2,5401_ 16,0001 1 1 I 1 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS 1 1 1 1 1 1 EST'ED FY86-87 BALANCE TOTAL PROJECT FY87-88 FY88-89 BUDGET 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 01- 60'0001-15.Q901- 92AQQ01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY TOTAL EXPENDITURE FUNDING SCHEDULE 1-1fi.4991--1.5491 _ ? x.4491 A A A. 16,000 2,540 16.000 91__§.(1.401)1_16.4091..12.09.01 A A A 60,000 16.000 92,000 FUND N0. FUNDING SOURCES 1151 State Gas Tax 120 (County Gas Tax ***AAAA****** 8,0001 8,0001 FUNDING DISTRIBUTION ************** TOTAL I 1 1 1 1 1 8,0001 01 55,0001_ 1010001_ 73,,0001 8,0001 01_ 510001_ 6 0001_ 1910001 2, 5401 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL FUNDING 16,000 2.540 16,000 0 60.000 16.000 92,000 April 4, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1988 APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BICYCLE PATH REPAIR CIP 87-165, FY 87-88 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. approve the plans and specifications for bicycle path repair, and 2. authorize staff to advertise for bids for the bicycle path repair project and to issue addenda as necessary. Background: At the June 23, 1987, City Council meeting, Council adopted the FY 87-88 CIP Budget, which appropriated $9,766 for bicycle path repairs. The repair area is located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue from 35th Street to 29th Court. The Department of Public Works conducted a field survey to determine which parts of the bicycle path require repairs. The Engineer's Estimate (Exhibit A) was developed from the field survey and unit prices. A construction schedule (Exhibit B) has been developed to provide a time frame for funding. Specifications are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Analysis: Staff has determined that this project is ready to go out to bid. The funds available will be used to remove and replace deterio- rated portions of the existing concrete wall adjacent to the bicycle path. Fiscal Impact: CIP 87-165 FY 87-88 Budgeted Amount Amount Expended Balance $9,766 -0- $ 9,766 Total available funds $ 9,766 Engineer's Estimate $10,573 The Engineer's Estimate exceeds the budgeted amount and additional funding may be necessary. 1 1I: This money is restricted and can be used for bikeway improvements only. The funding is provided by the Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Senate Bill 821, allocating $4,897 in FY 86-87 and $4,897 in FY 87-88. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. modify the scope of work, or 2. drop the project. Respectfully submitted, Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer Concur: 44' Vii._.. evin B. No the a City Manager Concur: Ant?fony Antich Director of Pu lie Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Attachments: Exhibit A - Engineer's Estimate Exhibit B - Construction Schedule Exhibit C - Map of Work Locations Copy of CIP 87-165 Budget (FY 87-88) 2 BICYCLE PATH REPAIR CIP 85-165 FY 87-88 Length of Section Station to be replaced 0+00 35th St. going south 0+41 5 0+58 32 1+34 6 1+63 24 2+51 65 3+25 96 4+42 72 5+54 5 5+66 5 5+81 9 5+98 5 7+26 5 7+46 51 8+66 7 8+85 9 9+02 15 9+34 105 10+62 5 11+32 73 13+14 End Total 594 ft. EXHIBIT A ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Minimum length for a section to be removed and replaced shall be 5 ft. Cost to remove and replace using existing rebar: $17.80 / lin. ft. = ($17.80/lin. ft.)(594 lin. ft.) = $10,573. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME : CIP .%7"' (6s BLKa Pica{ IZEPAIP S LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : ®® ® jai sa. ACCOUNT NUMBER s ACTUAL SCHEDULE : agemowneaurmi X : 1009E COMPLETE n I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1- I. I I TASKS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC I I I I I I 1 I I I ------I I I Final design approval before advertising for construction I awl Prepare advertisement & set bid opening) • 4111111 I I I I 1 I 1 date 11111 1 I .1+1111 I• .S -'-I I I I I I Advertising period (issue addendums as necessary) I I I I l ll 1 1-�"-' I 1 1 1 1 I Accept sealed bids & public bid opening T I I I .11111 I--"---.1 I I I I I Review bids EXHIBIT B 1 1 1 11111 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 Award contract I 1 1 I�III 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sign contract (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) Preconstruction meeting procedure 1 I I (1111 I 1 "1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 111111 1 I --j---1------1 1 1 1 1 Issue "Notice to Proceed" 1 1 I hirm`iflir I 1 I I 1 I I Construction Period I 1 I'-llllllllllllrI 1 1 1 I 1 I Monitor progress & maintain records Progress payment end I I I I 111111111111111 . I I I I I I change order procedure Acceptance of work as complete Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" Retention Payment Project close .out 1 I 1 1 1 I-.j111rff I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 .11111/11.1 I I --I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 11111110 I 1 I---i--I 1 • I. 1 1 I I IIJI :iUIuu11111111111iiir 1 I I 1 1------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • EXHIBIT C CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAILEFOTENIIA SCALE: 1 INCH•400 FEET j4L I 4.••••• —J a r7. • ; tri"__, I t r -r ;., • ••• r-----, 1 ' i • • =7.7,7= ' ILL! J IM Ljuno OWE w ::\ NORN11Nl1DE� 0111112 SILVER STRANO • AVE. , N^Y1RII[ w r1 1� s. AVE'. . 1 Itr 1 Vy0. CII w .. • A AVENUE N[RYOIA STA. 0+00 STA. 13+ 'if CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM •FY86-87 THROUGH FY88-89 PROJECT NAME: Hermosa Beach Miscellaneous Bikeway Constm- EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT NUMBER: CIP 87-165 COST ELEMENTS 1 1 •ADOPTED FY 85-861 EXPECTED) 1 I I I TOTAL ACCOUNT NUMBER: 115-401-8165-4201 FY 85-86 EXPENDED TIIRU FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 . PROJECT BUDGET 02/28/86 06/30/86 COST I PROGRAM AREA: , Street & Safety Improvements PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 1 I 1 1 1 I I f PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PLANS, SPECS & ESTIMATESI 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I CONSTRUCTION This CIP provides for: I I I I I_ 9,266-i I_ 9,766_1 - Preliminary engineering leading to construction INSPECTION - Right-of-way acquisition I I I I I I I I g y q OTHER DIRECT COSTS - Construction and reconstruction I I I I I I I I - Repair and maintenance (off-street bikeways only) _(, I I I I I I I I - Purchase and installation of features such as benches drinking fountains, changing rooms, and bicycle racks. I I I I I I I I SUBTOTAL 1 1-------- I I 1- 9266.1 1_ 9_,266_, CONTINGENCY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 9,766 9,766 FUNDING SOURCES FUNDING DISTRIBUTION TOTAL i. Grant Fund (1) I 1 1 1 14,897 1 1 4,897 I' I• I I 11 I I I • _1t_kat_Fl-ulan--------1 1 1 I I- 4 L$c9_ I 1_4.m., 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I • TOTAL 9,766 9,766 (1) TDA Article 3 (SB 821) FY86-87 Allocation (2) TDA Article 3 (SB 821) FY87-88 Allocation - 1 - Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 24, 1988 Regular Meeting of April 12, 1988 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT REMODEL, FIRST FLOOR, CIP 87-606 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Award and authorize the Mayor to with Stuart Construction Company Department Remodel including the exceed $148,962. 2. Authorize staff to issue addenda limits. sign the attached contract for the first floor Police Dispatch Room at a cost not to as necessary within budget BACKGROUND: At the February 23, 1988 City Council meeting Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized staff to advertise for bids for CIP 87-606. The project was publicly advertised for three weeks and the following contractors received a bid package: ANALYSIS: Four bids BG Construction QECE Keith KC Lee General Building Contractors Stuart Construction Company Nationwide Construction Company J.R. Hinkley & Associates Bay Oak Constructors C.R. Moore, Inc. Cavecche Engineering & Construction Company William E. Brugman Management & Development Co. sealed bids were received by the City Clerk on March 24, 1988. were publicly opened and read aloud. The bids were as follows: Stuart Construction Company B.G. Construction Company Brugman Management & Develoment Cavecche Engineering & Construction Architect's Estimate * % higher than the architect's estimate $135,420 (13%)* $137,200 (15%) $140,000 (17%) Co. $197,250 (65%) $119,490 The Five references were called to determine the bidders' qualifications. The reference questionnaire indicates that Stuart Construction is capable of doing this type of work, finishing on schedule, within budget and producing quality work. Stuart Construction has a valid B-1 General Contractor's License (No. 519766) with the State of California. 1 FISCAL IMPACT: Contractor Bid $135,420 10% Contingency. 13,542 Not to Exceed 148,962 Budgeted Proposed Additional Amount Contract Amount Approx. Required Design $ 14,630 $ 14,630 $ -0- Construction 115,000 148,962 33,962 Inspection 11,500 5,000 <6,500> Subtotal 141,130 168,592 27,542 Contingency 12,650 500 <12,312> TOTAL: $153,780 $169,092 $ 15,312 $15,312 additional funds are necessary to complete this project. This project will span two fiscal years (FY 87-88 and FY 88-89). Based on the progress payment schedule no additional funds are necessary during the current fiscal year. The additional funding necessary to complete this project will be reflected in the FY 88-89 budget. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Reject the low bidder 2. Rebid the project 3. Modify the scope of work 4. Drop the project Respectfully submitted, Brian W. Gengl4r Assistant Engineer Concur: ,. Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager BWG/umv Attachments: Contract CIP Budget (FY 87-88) Project Schedule Concur: An ony Antich Director of Public Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator cc: Steve Wisniewski, Public Safety Director 2 PART III -E CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONTRACT FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT REMODEL, FIRST FLOOR CIP 87-606, FY 87-88 THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into this 24th day of Marrh , 1988, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "City", and Stuart Construction Co., Inc. , hereinafter referred to as "Contractor". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, City and Contractor have executed the bonds at- tached and incorporated by this reference, and WHEREAS, City desires to contract with Contractor to perform the services detailed in said bonds and in the Specifications and Proposal, and WHEREAS, Contractor has represented that it is fully qualified to assume and discharge such responsibility; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do agree as follows: 1. Scope of Work: CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to furnish all labor, materials and equipment necessary to perform the work necessary to achieve the Police Department Remodel, First Floor in accordance with the Plans and Specifications hereby attached as Part IV and the Special Provisions included hereinafter. Such work shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner, under the terms as stated herein and in the Notice to Contractors, In- structions to Bidders, and Special Provisions and Proposal and in accordance with the latest edition of the Joint Cooperative Com- mittee, Southern California Chapters of the American Public Work 1 Association and the Associated General Contractors of America, document entitled, "Standard Specifications for Public Works Con- struction". In the event of any conflict between the terms of this agreement and any of the above-referenced documents, the terms of this agreement shall be controlling. 2. Compensation. In consideration of the services rendered hereunder, Contractor shall be paid according to the prices as submitted on the Proposal. Monthly progress payments will be made within thirty (30) days after invoicing of Contractor's services. 3. Hold Harmless; Insurance. It is specifically understood and agreed by all parties hereto that Contractor is, for the pur- poses of this Agreement, an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Accordingly, Contractor shall not be deemed the City's employee for any purpose whatsoever. Contrac- tor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obliga- tion or liability whatever for or against City and shall hold harmless and defend the City of Hermosa Beach from and against any and all obligations, claims, liens, or causes of actions, arising out of or related to Contractor's services hereunder. Contractor shall file and maintain a file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement, a copy or certificate of general liability insurance for bodily injury and property damage protecting Contractor in amounts not less than $500,000.00 for injuries to one person, $1,000,000.00 for injuries to more than one person and $100,000.00 for property damage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled without thirty (30) days' prior written 2 notice to City, shall name the City and its officers and em- ployees as additional insured, and shall include all automobiles utilized by Contractor's personnel in the performance of this Agreement. 4. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by Con- tractor, in whole or in part, without the prior consent of City. 5. Termination. This agreement may be cancelled by City at any time without penalty upon thirty (30) days' written notice. In the event of termination without fault of Contractor, City shall pay Contractor for all services rendered prior to date of termination, and such payment shall be in full satisfaction of all services rendered hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the within Agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ATTEST: By Mayor - City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk APPROVED AS : ORM: ity Attorney CONTRACTOR 'By 3 Stuart Co truc'ion Co.., Inc. CITY OF HERNM®SA .BEACH • • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU FY88-89 • SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM • • PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER: PROGRAM AREA: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: WORK PROPOSED: Phase I Phase II Phase III Police Department Remodel CIP 87-606 001-401-8606-4201. • Public Buildings & Grounds Completed - Director of Public Safety offices. Demolition and modification of approximately 1,750 •square feet of existing space in the Police Facility (to be bid in two phases) - remodel and ., dispatching center. The work will include updating the existing electrical power and mechanical to service the modified square footage, selection of flooring material, wall treatments, fixed storage, ceiling treatment and other appurtenant work. Redesign of basement floor locker and shower rooms (for female employees), patrol officer 2 bri4fing & work area and office spaces for patrol. This work will lead to the construction of these improvements. 70 feet x 30 feet x $100/sf - $210,000 (1) June 23, 1987 Council Action: -$10,000 General rund (Design only) August 11, 1987 Council Action,: $43,000 General Fund designation for CIP October 13, 1987 Council Action: . 1. $77,500 Reserved for RCC on June 23, 1987 2. $22,380 Additional appropriation • BUDGET SCHEDULE Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 •Col 6 Col 7 EXPENDED EST'ED EST'ED TOTAL PROJECT ELEMENTS BUDGET TIIRU THRU FY86-87 PROJECT FY86-872/28/871 6/30/871 BALANCEFY87-88FY88-89.BUDGET I 1I 1 1 1 i PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 'PLANS, SPECS & ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS • I I I 11 1 13,3001 1 13,3001 1115,0001210,0001325,0001 1 11,5001 1 11,5001 ' I I I I I I I• I I I I I• SUBTOTAL • CONTINGENCY ' 1139,8001210,0001349,8001 13,980 13,980 TOTAL EXPENDITURE FUNDING SCHEDULE 153,780 210,000 363,780 FUND NO. FUNDING SOURCES ****************** FUNDING DISTRIBUTION ************** TOTAL • I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 001 General Fund (1) I I I 1153,7801 1153,7801 Unfunded 1210 000 2100001 TOTAL FUNDING 153,780 210,000 363,780 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME : CIP 87-606: First Floor Police Dent. Remodel, Including Dispatch Roan ACCOUNT NUMBER : 001-400-8606-4201 LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : misminiamon ACTUAL SCHEDULE : immungamonme X s 100% COMPLETE TASKS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 JAN 1 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Final design approval before advertising,11t1111111a11 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I for construction Prepare advertisement & set bid opening 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 date 11111111111111, Advertising period 1111111111 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I• (issue addendums as necessary) Accept sealed bids & public bid opening 1 1 1 11„11 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 Review bids 1 1 1/11111/1 1 1 1 1 1 1--..—r1 1 1 Award contract 1 1 1 X81811 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sign contract 1 1 1 I1 1 1 1 (bonds insurance & workers comp. cert.) 111/11111 1 1 1 Preconstruction meeting procedure 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1111111111 Issue "Notice to Proceed" • 1 1 1 1 11111 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Construction Period 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I itosiskiiisstesommeliummielowslisi Monitor. progress & maintain records 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 I I I Progress payment and 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 change order procedure 11a111a11a11111t1t11111111111a111111 Acceptance of work as complete 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111111 Issusing and recording a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I "Notice of Completion" 1111111111 Retention Payment 1 1 1 1• 1 1 1 1 I ------I I I 1 11111111111111 project close out X11. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 e1111a1a1a1ta11aaeaaaaaalaataal 1......1 1_N_1_1 1 I......1 1______1 1 1 1 1 • • April 4, 1988 Regular Meeting of April 12, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR ASPHALT STREET REPAIR - CIP 87-171 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign the attached Agreement (Exhibit A) with Vernon Paving for asphalt street repair within the City. 2. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary not to exceed the budgeted amount of $82,500. Background: At the March 3, 1988 City Council meeting Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized staff to advertise for bids for CIP 87-171. This contract will remove and replace selected portions of asphalt streets and seal cracks in 'designated asphalt streets throughout the City. The project was publicly advertised for two weeks. The following contractors received a bid package: Vernon Paving Goss Construction Copp Contracting Madison Paving Industrial Asphalt Griffith Company Sully -Miller Contracting Analysis: Four sealed bids were received by the City Clerk on March 31, 1988. The bids were publicly opened and read aloud. The bids were as follows: Vernon Paving Sully -Miller Contracting Copp Contracting Griffith Company 1 $69,673.28 $76,169.75 $77,610.00 $77,616.00 The Engineer's estimate was: $82,500.00 Five references were called to determine the bidder's qualifications. The reference questionnaire indicates that Vernon Paving is capable of doing this type of work, finishing on schedule, within budget and producing quality work. Vernon Paving has a valid B-1 General Contractor License (No. 519766) with the State of California. In addition Vernon Paving performed last year's paving work satisfactorily. This Year's Cost Versus Last Year's Cost: Vernon Paving's unit price per ton of asphalt this year was $118.88 as compared to $77.25 last year, which represents a 54% increase. Staff contacted Vernon Paving to ask why their cost is higher this year. Vernon Paving said that the major reason for the increase was a miscalculation by Vernon for last year. Last year the next lowest bidder was $130.00 per ton; 68% higher than Vernon. Secondary causes for the 54% increase were higher labor and material costs. Los Angeles County Public Works gave an estimate of a reasonable unit price per ton for a job of this size. The contractor must place approximately 131 tons of asphalt in 30 locations throughout the City, which involves moving his equipment to each new location. A price range of $150.00 to $200.00 per ton was suggested for a job this small and with scattered locations. Staff concludes that Vernon's unit price of $118.88 per ton is reasonable for this project. Fiscal Impact: Budgeted Amt. Amt. Expended Proposed Contract To Date Amount CIP 87-171- $82,500 -0- $69,673.28 No additional funding is necessary to complete this project. The proposed contract amount is based on unit prices times the Engineer's estimated quantities. If additional work is required, then additional money will be used up to but not exceeding the budgeted amount. 2 Alternatives: 1. Reject the low bidder 2. Rebid the project 3. Modify the scope of work 4. Drop the project Respectfully submitted, Brian W. Gengl Assistant Engineer Concur: 'Kevin . Northcraft City Manager BWG/umv authasph/v Attachments: Agreement Project Schedule 3 Concur: Anthony Antich Director of Pu•lic Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AGREEMENT FOR ASPHALT STREET REPAIRS FY 87-88 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 12th day of April , 198', by and between the CITY OF . HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "City", and Vernon Paving. Incorporated • , hereinafter referred to as "Contractor". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, City and Contractor have executed the bonds attached and incorporated by this reference, and WHEREAS, City desires to contract with Contractor to perform the services detailed in said bonds and in the Proposal, and WHEREAS, Contractor has represented that it is fully qualified to assume and discharge such responsibility; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do agree as follows: 1. Scope of Work: CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to furnish all labor, materials and equipment necessary to perform street repair work in accordance with the Special Provisions included hereinafter. Such work shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner, under the terms as stated herein, and in accordance with the latest edition of the Joint Cooperative Com- mittee, Southern California Chapters of the American Public Works Association and the Associated General Contractors of America, document entitled, "Standard Specifications for Public Works Con- struction". In the event of any conflict between the terms of this agreement and any of the above -referenced documents, the terms of this agreement shall be controlling. The City reserves the right to reject any or all bids. The Contractor's bid shall be valid for a period of ninety (90) days. 2. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE PUBLIC (a) Laws to be Observed. IMO MP The CONTRACTOR shall keep himself fully informed of all existing and future State and National laws, all municipal ordinances and regulations of the City of Hermosa Beach,. CA and of all such orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority over the same, which in any manner affect those engaged or employed in the work, or the materials used in the work, or which in any way af- fect the conduct of the work, and shall•abide by and comply with all of such laws, ordinances and orders. (b) Hours of Labor. -- The CONTRACTOR shall abide by and comply with provisions of the Labor Code, and in particular of Sections 1810 to 1815 thereof, inclusive, concerning length of the work day and.work week and requirements for overtime compen- sation. There is to be no construction activity within the City of Hermosa Beach between the hours of 5:00 p.m., and 7:00 a.m. (c) Prevailing Wages. -- Not less than general prevailing rate of per diem wages shall be paid to employees of 'the CONTRACTOR, as provided in Labor Code Section 1775. Said rates have been determined by the California Department of In- dustrial Relations, a copy of which determination is on file at the City Hall and is available to any interested party upon request. (d) Labor Discrimination. -- No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of the race, religious creed, color, ancestry or national origin, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, or sex of such person, except as provided in Section 1420 of the Labor Code. Every Contractor for Public Works violating this section is subject to all penalties imposed for violation. (e) Permits and Licenses. -- The CONTRACTOR shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees, and give all notices necessary and incidental to the due and lawful prosecution of the work: (f) Patents. -- The CONTRACTOR shall assume all responsibilities arising from the use of patented materials, equipment, devices, or processes used on or incorporated in the work. • (g) Public Convenience and Safety. -- The CONTRACTOR shall so conduct his operations as to cause the least possible obstruction and inconvenience to public traffic. (h) Responsibility for Damage. -- The City of HERMOSA BEACH, the City Council, or the Engineer shall not be responsible or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, for any material or equipment used in performing the work, for injury or damage to any person or persons (either workers or the public) or for damage to adjoining property from any cause whatsoever. The CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and save harm- less the City of Hermosa Beach, CA,, its officers and employees, the City Council, and the City Engineer from any suits, claims or actions brought by any person and persons on account of any in- juries or damages sustained in the performance of the work or in consequence thereof. The City Council may retain money due to the CONTRACTOR as it shall consider necessary until disposition has been made of such suits or claims for damages as aforesaid. (i) Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance. -- Neither the City of .Herm_osa.Beach. CA', the City Engineer nor any other officer, employee, agent or appointee of the City of Hermosa peach, CA. shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under the contract. • Concurrently with the execution of any contract incor- porating these specifications, CONTRACTOR shall procure a policy of liability insurance from a company authorized to do business in the State of California, which policy shall insure the City of Hermosa Beach, CA. against any and all liability for death, in- jury, loss or damage to person or property arising out of or in any manner related to CONTRACTOR'S operations under any contract that may be let pursuant to these specifications. Such policy of insurance shall contain not less than the following limits of liability: Bodily Injury Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) for death or bodily injury or loss sustained by any one person in . any one accident; and One Million Dol lars ($1,000,000.00) for death, bodily injury or loss sustained by more than one person in any one incident; Property Damage Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) for loss occasioned by damage or injury to property in any one incident; and Combined Limits A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in the amount of One Million, Dollars ($1,000,000.00) will be considered equivalent to the required minimum limits. CONTRACTOR shall concurrently with the execution of the contract, deliver said policy of insurance, or a certified photo- static copy thereof, to the City Attorney for approval by him as to form and sufficiency, and the contract shall not be effective, for any purpose,.until such insurance policy is so delivered and so approved. When such policy has been so approved, it shall be -5- filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City. In lieu of filing said insurance policy with the CITY, the same will be 'returned to CONTRACTOR, after approval as to sufficiency and as to form as above provided, if the CONTRACTOR shall file with the CITY a Contractor's Insurance Certificate, executed by the in- surance carrier, certifying that the aforesaid insurance is in full force and effect and that all operations of the insured, un- der the contract entered into pursuant to these specifications are covered thereby, and that the policy will not be cancelled without giving the City thirty (30) days' prior written notice. CONTRACTOR shall pay, at his own expense, all premiums upon said policy and shall maintain the same in full force and effect during the life of the contract. The procuring of such policy of insurance shall not be construed as a limitation of CONTRACTOR'S liability or as a full performance on CONTRACTOR'S part of the indemnification provisions of the contract. CONTRACTOR'S liability shall be notwithstanding such policy of insurance, for the full and total amount of'any, damage, injury or loss caused by or related to CONTRACTOR'S operations under the contract. (j) .Worker's Compensation Insurance. -- The CON- TRACTOR at all times shall keep fully insured at his own expense, all persons employed by. him, in connection with the contract as required by the Worker's Compensation Insurance and Safety Act" of the State of California, and shall hold the CITY free and harmless from all liability that may arise by reason of the in- juries to any employees of the CONTRACTOR who are injured while -6- performing any work or labor necessary to carry out the provi- sions of this contract. The CONTRACTOR shall during the life of the contract, keep on file with the City Clerk evidence that the CONTRACTOR is fully and properly insured as required by said Act, which evidence shall be approved by the City Attorney of the CITY as to form and sufficiency. (k) Traffic Safety. -- The CONTRACTOR'S operations shall not create any hazardous traffic conditions nor shall they `unnecessarily inconvenience the public. Unless otherwise authorized, traffic shall be permitted to pass through the work, or a safe temporary detour shall be provided. Access to fire hydrants, bus stops and driveway entrances shall be unobstructed unless otherwise approved by the City. The CONTRACTOR shall comply with applicable State, County and City requirements for street closures. The CONTRACTOR shall provide barriers, cones, delineators, lights, signs, coverplates and flagging as required to advise the public of detours and construction hazards. (3) PROSECUTION, PROGRESS AND PAYMENT (a) Subletting and Assignment. -- The CONTRACTOR shall give his personal attention to the fulfillment of the con- tract and shall keep the,work under his control. Subcontractors will not be recognized as such, and all persons engaged in the work will be considered as employees of the CONTRACTOR, .and their work will be subject to the provisions of the contract and specifications. -7- (b) Progress of the Work and Time for Completion: -- The CONTRACTOR shall bagin work within ten (10) days upon written notice to proceed and shall diligently prosecute the same from said date to the expiration of the contract. (c) Suspension of the 'Contract: -- If at any time in the opinion of the City Council the CONTRACTOR has failed to supply an adequate working force, or equipment of proper quality, or has failed in any other respect to prosecute the work within the diligence and force specified and intended in and by the terms of the contract; notice thereof in writing will be served upon him, and should he neglect or refuse to provide means for a satisfactory compliance with the contract, as directed by the Director of Public Works, within the time specified in such notice, the City Council in any such case shall have the power to suspend the operation of the contract. (d) 'Payments: -- The CONTRACTOR shall bill the City monthly (or twice monthly) for services performed and materials used.. Progress payments shall be reimbursed on an actual cost basis less a ten (10) percent retention. For purposes of calculating payment for services, costs shall be based on "Attachment I/1 Schedule of Rates" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Payment for item #1 shall be based upon actual tonnage of asphalt tickets submitted with a particular invoice. Payment for item #2 shall be based upon actual crew -days spent in crack sealing, submitted with time tickets showing laborers and hours worked. The final payment shall include remittance of the ten (10) percent retention, and shall be made within thirty (30) days of the Hermosa Beach City Council's acceptance of the work as complete. 4. SPECIAL PROVISIONS (a) Terms of Contract: -- This contract shall take effect upon acceptance by the CONTRACTOR and the CITY and shall expire upon completion of work. Work shall be completed within thirty (30) calendar days from the time the Notice to Proceed is issued to the Contractor. (b) Work Procedures: -- The work to be performed shall be in accordance with the provisions of the work description - specified hereinafter. Reference is made to the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction 1985 edition of the Southern California Chapter, APWA and Southern California District, AGC of California, insofar as the same may apply (said specifications are hereinafter referred to as the Standard Specifications). (1) Item #1: Removal and Repacement of Pavement The work shall 'consist of removal of deteriorated surface material and repacement with asphaltic concrete material to restore pavement surface. The asphalt pavement shall be removed to clean straight lines. All materials removed shall be disposed of at a suitable disposal site. Arrangements for such disposal sites shall be made by the CONTRACTOR and approved by the CITY'S representative, when such areas are within the CITY right-of-way. The edges of bituminous pavement adjoining the excavated trench shall be trimmed to neat straight (vertical) lines to insure that all areas are accessible to rollers used to compact the subgrade. Wet or unstable subbase material shall be 'removed and replaced with a suitable material. The exposed subgrade shall be worked to a uniform depth and all rocks larger than three (3) inches in diameter or other extraneous material shall be removed. Rolling of subgrade shall always be commenced along the edge of the area to be compacted and the roller shall gradually advance toward the center of the area to be compacted. Roller shall be operated along the lines parallel with the centerline of the roadway. Areas inaccessible to rolling equipment shall be compacted thoroughly to required lines and grades by means of degree of compaction as pneumatic tampers. The sides of the prepared hole should be given a tack coat of emulsion at a rate of 0.05 to 0.15 gallon per square yard. The surface to be tacked shall be swept clean of dust, and foreign matter. The CONTRACTOR shall be careful not to apply an excess of emulsion and shall allow enough time before backfilling to insure adequate cure time. Placing and compacting of the asphalt concrete shall conform to Section 302-5 of the Standard Specifications. The roadway and adjacent areas shall be left with a neat and finished appearance. (2) Item #2: Crack Filling For cracks in size from 1/4 inch to 3/8 inch in width, the crack shall be widened using a router to form a sealant reservoir which is 1/2 inch wide and 3/4 inch to 1 inch deep. The routed crack shall then be cleaned with compressed air to remove all dust and free moisture, then filled with sealant from the bottom up to the surface level in a manner which does not result in sealant bridging or entrapped air pockets. With deep cracks, settlement may occur, thus requiring application of a second layer of sealant. All cracks shall be filled with sealant to the level of the adjacent pavement. All excess sealant shall be removed from the crack with a minimum overlap onto adjacent pavement. All debris shall be swept off the street and disposed of at the contractors expense by the end of each work day. (c) Material (1) Item #1: Asphalt The material specifications shall be as follows: Asphalt concrete, 3/4" or 1/2* inch maximum per Section 203-6, as requred; Emulsion, RS-1 as per Section 203-3; Aggregate Base, 1-1/2 inch maximum as per Section 200-2 of the Standard Specifications. Note that use of Aggregate Base to bring excavated area up to final subgrade is optional. * The City's Representative has authority to select 1/2" or 3/4" maximum size asphalt concrete. (2) Item #2:' Crack Sealant Asphalt-Vulcanized Rubber Material: The asphalt to be used shall have a maximum penetration of 150. The granulated crumb rubber (100 percent vulcanized) shall meet the following requirements: Passing Sieve Percent No. 8 100 No. 10 98-100 No. 40 0-10 The specific gravity of the granulated crumb rubber shall be 1.15 + 0.02 and shall be free of fabric, wire or other contaminating materials, except that up to four (4) percent of calcium carbonate may be included to prevent particles from sticking together. The proportions of the two materials, by weight, shall be 75 percent ± 2 percent and 25 percent ± 2 percent rubber. The asphalt-vulcanized rubber material shall be accompanied by a certificate of compliance from the manufacturer. 5. BID PROPSOAL FORM INSTRUCTION Bids are required for the entire work. The amount of the bid for comparison purposes will be the total of all items. The bid shall be set forth for each item of work, in clearly legible figures, a unit price and a total for the item in the respective spaces provided for this purpose, per Attachment II. In the case of unit price items, the amount set forth under the "Total" column shall be the extension of the unit price bid on the basis of the estimated quantity for the item. The estimated quantity for Item #1, removing and replacing asphalt, is based upon an estimated square footage and a thickness of 4". The actual payment shall be. based upon actual tons of asphalt placed. The estimated quantity for Item #2, crack sealing, is based upon an estimated total length of cracks. The actual payment shall be based upon actual crew-days spent. The cost of a crew-day shall include all labor, material, tools, equipment and incidentals, with the contractors overhead and profit included, required for crack routing, crack cleaning, application of sealant and sweeping debris in accordance with the plans and these special provisions, and no additional compensation will be allowed therefore. 6.GUARANTEES AND BONDS (a) Proposal Guarantee: -- Each proposal submitted must be accompanied by cash, or by a certified or cashier's check, or surety bond, payable to the City of Hermosa Beach, in an amount equivalent to at least ten (10) percent of the total base bid price of such proposal, as a guarantee that the bidder, if his proposal be accepted, will enter into and execute the awarded contract; and no proposal will be accepted unless such cash, check or surety bond is enclosed therewith. However, the use of a surety bond in this connection shall be subject to the condition that the surety thereon be approved by the City Attorney. Should any bidder to whom an award is made fail to properly enter into and execute the awarded contract, the cash, check or bond submitted with his proposal shall be forefeited to, and become the property of the City of Hermosa Beach, whereupon the City shall have the right to collect the amount thereof by an appropriate means. Following the award of contract, the proposal guarantees will be returned to the respective bidders by whom they were submitted, except as otherwise hereinabove provided. (b) Return of Proposal Guarantees: -- Within ten (10) days after the notice of award of the contract, the City of Hermosa Beach will return the proposal guarantee, accompanying such of the proposals which are not further considered in making the award. All other proposal guarantees will be held until the contract has been finally executed, after which all proposal guarantees, except those forfeited, will be returned to the respective bidders whose proposals they accompany. (c) Contract Bonds: --The successful Contractor shall furnish two bonds required by the State Contract Act. Each of the said bonds shall be executed in a sum equal to the contract price. One of the bonds shall guarantee the faithful performance of the said contract by the Contractor; and the other of the said bonds shall secure the payment of claims for labor and material. (7) MISCELLANEOUS CITY'S representative will identify and mark out surface areas in need of repair. (See Attachment I -Locations) It is recommended that each bidder survey -these locations prior to submitting his bid. Generally, these will be concentrated so that all repairs will be made at one time in each given area. The Contractor shall pave all excavated areas the same day that he removes the existing asphalt. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach caused this Agreement to be subscribed by its Mayor and City Clerk and said Company has executed or caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officers. DATED: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Clerk. Mayor PPROVED A TO FORM City tt•'ney bidprop DMM:mv 1/5/87 CONTRACTOR President Secretary CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE . PROJECT NAME i CIP . g7— 17( r %,SP HALT REPAIRS LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : anamossame . ACCOUNT NUMBER : ACTUAL SCHEDULE i ammammtmearamaca ' X : 100% COMPLETE n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TASKS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC n approval 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- 1' 1 Final design before advertising • for construction 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I Prepare advertisement & set bid opening 1111111 date Advertising period 1' 1 IIIII 1• 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 (issue addendums as necessary) 11E1 " 1 1 1 11- -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Accept sealed bids & public bid opening 111111 - Review bids 1 1 1 IIII 1- ..---,•1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Award contract 1 1 1 11111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sign contract 1 1 1 :1`111 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) Preconstruction meeting procedure I 1 1 11111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Issue "Notice to Proceed" • 1 1 1 111111 1 I I—----1. I I I 1 Construction Period I I I 171EI11�Tii1 —I I I I I I - 1 1 1 1 1-111111111111-1 I 1 1 1 Monitor progress & maintain records r• 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 1 Progress payment and 111LL.111111111111 1 I ' • change order procedure 1I I 1 1 1--- 1 1 1 1 1 1 j Acceptance of work as complete 111�1T�1 1 1 I I I 1 ,I I I--- —1 I I 1 Issusing and recording a 11111.11:I "Notice of Completion" 1 I I I I I 1I I I ---i--1------1 nt Reteion Payment •II1111�� Project clone ;out " I I , I I 1111 I 1 I : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .� • April 4, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council April 12, 1988 WOMEN'S PROFESSIONAL BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff and the Community Resources Commission that City Council approve the attached permit request for a Women's Professional Beach Volleyball Tournament (submitted by Group Dynamics, Inc.) and direct staff to negotiate a contract per the conditions of our pro tournament policy. BACKGROUND At the March 28, 1988, Community Resources Commission meeting, the Commissioners unamiously approved the attached permit request. There have been two (2) professional tournaments scheduled for this season to date: A Women's event on July 23 -24th and a Men's event on Sept. 24 -25th. Because this tournament, if approved, would add one more pro tournament to the summer, the Commission is requesting Council's final endorsement of the event. The request submitted by Group Dynamics is to conduct a Women's Pro Tournament on August 27-28, 1988. Last summer, Group Dynamics conducted Hermosa's first Women's professional tournament. Attached (FYI) you will find a list of all 1988 professional and amatuer volleyball tournaments scheduled to date. ANALYSIS Group Dynamics, Inc. acted as the marketing firm for the Miller Lite Men's Pro Tourney from 1985-1987. Last summer they also conducted the Le Coq Sportif Women's Pro Tourney in Hermosa Beach. To date, Group Dynamics has always presented professional and orderly events in the City. They have cooperated with all of our requests and have been responsive to our concerns. Last summer's Le Coq Sportif event was especially smooth running and had no negative incidents. 1 0 It is anticipated this same kind of success would occur with the proposed 1988 tournament. Concur: 2ir Alana M. Dept. of Mastrian, Director Community Resources Kevin Northcraft City Manager R �%eecct ull submitted, Mary C./.00ney, Coordinator Dep . q"f Community Resources VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENTS 1988 AMATUER VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENTS: May 21-22 June 11-12 Aug. 6-7 Men's A Men's Master Women's Open CBVA CBVA CBVA PRO VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENTS: July 23-24 Women's Pritchard Sept. 24-25 Men's AVP City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 376-6984 extension 280 or 379-3312 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION Organization's Name: GROUP DYNAMICSi INC. Profit XX Non -Profit Non-profit Number Organization's Address: 2601 OCEAN PARK BLVD., SANTA MONICA,. CA Zip Code 90405 Phone Number(s): ((213) 452 - 5056 It Contact Person and Title: Jack Butefish, President Contact Person's Address: SAME Zip Code Daytime Phone Number:sAME Evening Phone Number: • Brief Description of Event: WOMEN'S PROFESSIONAL BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT Date (s) of Event: AUGUST 27-28, 1988 Location(s) of Event: The Pier (North side) Set—up Time: q!nO AM on Friday. Aueust 26th Time Event is to Commence: 7:00 AM AUGUST 27th s Number of Participants (Including volunteers): 75 Anticipated Number of Spectators: 2 000 - 3,000/dav Number of Vehicles Involved and How Used: one (1) eauinment truck 2-5 sponsor display vehicles, staff cars (approx. 10) Description of Set-up for this Event: SAME AS OUR 1987 LE COQ SPORTIF WOMEN'S PRO BEACH EVENT. !! Additional Information or Special Requests: • Fees, Charges and Other Requirements: Police Costs Fire Costs Business License Public Works Costs Processing Fee Other Costs $ Total Due $ Refundable Damage Deposit Damage Deposit is due: Balance of fees incurred are due: Insurance Required: Yes No Date Received Unless greater or lessor coverage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa beach evidence of $1 million comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees as additional insureds. Expiration Date . Permittee waives claims against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees, for fees or damages caused by, arising out of, or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND TO RETURN SAID PREMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED H COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. A NECESSARY MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND/ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCE PAR REIN IS TRUE AND FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER FURNISHED TO THE S MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTH eas restative Date Permit to be processed through City Council: Yes If YES, Council's decision: No Application is invalid without the following signatures: Department of Community Resouces Police Department Authorization Fire Department Authorization if Required Life Guard Authorization Needed on all Water Events Date Date Date Date March 31, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council April 12, 1988 UNIFORM PARK SIGNAGE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Community Resources Advisory Commission that City Council establish a policy for uniform signage in all parks and parkettes in Hermosa Beach per the following guidelines suggested by the Commission: "imbedded stone-like monument signs using the Hermosa logo and built in proportion to the size of the park." BACKGROUND The Commission has been reviewing signage in the parkettes and has concluded not all parks have signs identifying them and the signs that are installed are not uniform. ANALYSIS In an effort to identify the parks and parkettes appropriately, the Commission strongly recommends the Council include in the 88/89 City budget funds necessary to at least begin this project. The Commission feels this will also enhance the City's image. Additionally, the Commission will be inspecting each park and parkette in order to develop a comprehensive list for City files and will be making recommendations to the Council for possible upgrade of each park and parkette. Noted: evin orthcr City Manager Respectfully submitted, Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Consistent, attractive signage is very desirable. The stipulation of sign guidelines should be deferred until professional input is obtained, (proposed in '88-89 budget.) 1p April 4, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council RECOMMENDATION City Council Meeting of April 12, 1988 DRINKING FOUNTAIN EDITH RODAWAY FRIENDSHIP PARK It is recommended by the Community Resources Commission that City Council approve the installation of a drinking fountain at Edith Rodaway Friendship Park; that City Council directs Public Works to perform the work; and that Council appropriate $350 from Prospective Expenditures to the Parks Budget for this project. BACKGROUND The Commission at its February 24, 1988, meeting directed staff to contact the Public Works Department to determine the feasibility of installing a drinking fountain at this new park. Public Works Director, Tony Antich responded by requesting recommendaiton to City Council from the Commission to allocate funds for the fountain. At the March 23, 1988 meeting, the Commission voted to forward the recommendation listed above. ANALYSIS With summer fast approaching and with the basketball courts in the park, it seems a drinking fquntain will be a necessary addition to the area. Since there is already water there, installation could be done immediately. Respectfull submitted, Mary Dep . Concur: Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources Kevin Northdraft City Manager oney, Coordinator Community Resources itt • April 5, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council April 12, 1988 AIR CONDITIONING: CIVIC THEATRE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Community Resources Advisory Commission that City Council include in the 88/89 budget discussions consideration for the installation of air conditioning in the Civic Theatre. BACKGROUND The adopted 87/88 budget included funding for air conditioning in the Civic Theatre in the approximate amount of $60,000. However, once the specifications were completed the estimated cost was in the neighborhood of $100,000. Given that increase, City Council tabled the matter for consideration during the 88/89 budget deliberations. ANALYSIS At the Commission meeting of March 28, 1988, the following motion was made: "To accept the Foundation's offer to raise 25% or $25,000 whichever is less to help fund the air conditioning project." The Commission then asked staff to inform the City Council of this action. Additionally the Commission wishes to convey to the Council the pressing need for the air conditioning. It is needed not only during the summer months, but year-round. Anytime the theatre is filled even to half capacity, it is most uncomfortable. Even though the Foundation is in its infancy, it is very willing to take on a project of this magnitude as it feels it is of paramount importance to have the theatre air conditioned. The Commission will do everything it can to assist the Foundation in its fundraising efforts. Concur;. 41 / evin orthcr ft City Manager Respectfully submitted, Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources 0.--24e,ry19 Le4,7 ir O. April 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council April 12, 1988 HERMOSA BEACH CIVIC THEATRE USAGE REPORT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND The City Council requested a report on the Civic Theatre usage in an effort to deliberate the pros and cons of installing air conditioning in that facility. ANALYSIS In 1983 the City Council adopted a three phase remodelling plan for the Civic Theatre located in the Community Center. Phase I of the plan we are all now enjoying, which is the initial interior redesign which included basic work such as raking, acoustics, seating, carpeting, partial electric, partial sound system, cosmetic appointments, partial lighting work, new restrooms and heating and ventilation work. Phase I costs were approximately $650,000. Phase II of the project calls for, among other things, a continuation of the heating and ventilation system. Now that the theatre has been in operation for four years, it is readily apparent the facility is in need of an air conditioning system for year round usage. The entire remodel project was developed into three phases of work due primarily to the cost of such a major undertaking. During these four years of operation, staff has had to learn very quickly the intricacies of operating a theatre, both from a business and technical standpoint. It has been a most interesting learning experience and one of the more important lessons learned, at least in staff's opinion, is that while the theatre looks wonderful to the viewing audience, technically it is woefully lacking major equipment that once installed, would result in a fully marketable theatrical/concert facility. On the other hand, given the fact we do not have a complete sound system, marginal lighting, no air conditioning and have had no funds for any kind of professional marketing of the theatre, the usage continues to increase, albeit, very slowly. FISCAL YEAR 87/88 USAGE The following is a breakdown of theatre usage per month and per type of activity for this present year. The only events scheduled in the theatre in July and August are worship services for Hope Chapel as they -are scheduled in there every Sunday throughout the year. PERFORMING ARTS MEETINGS/SEMINARS July 0 4 Aug. 0 4 Sept. 1 4 Oct. 9 6 Nov. 1 4 Dec. 8 4 Jan. 6 4 Feb. 12 4 Mar. 17 4 April 13 5 May 15 4 June 6 10 110 days 57 days Total number of days occupied: 167 The above breakdown represents 167 days of usage. Most of the usage is weekend evenings. The theatre is dark most weekdays. Given the number of hours available for use throughout the year (approx. 5,000 hrs.) the theatre is presently being used 25% of the available time. Of that 25% usage, approximately half of that is used by community groups for whom the fees are waived: i.e. School District, Community Center Foundation. REVENUE The revenue generated by rental of the theatre is as follows: 85/86: $ 4,667 86/87: 12,559 87/88: 14,000 (present fiscal year) CONCLUSION City Council would be hard pressed to try and justify an expenditure of $80,000 to $100,000 for air-conditioning based on present usage figures. However, Council must take into consideration the following facts. The theatre is one third completed. City Council must decide if 1) the expenditure will ultimately result in greater usage thus resulting in more programs and events being brought to the community; and 2) if the funds for the air conditioning are an investment in the theatre itself, just as perhaps the original expenditure of $650,000 was. The Community Center Foundation has assumed the undertaking of raising 25% of the total cost for the air conditioning, because the Foundation does believe it is an investment in not only the future of the theatre but in the City of Hermosa Beach as a whole. Noted• 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Respectfully submitted, Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources DATE: TO: FROM: RE: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM April 11, 1988 City Council City Manager City Attorney Deputy City Clerk Lois Peek Revised Proposed Ordinance No. 88-920 Attached you will find a copy of the subject ordinance which amends the Zoning Ordinance in regards to open space. The revisions occur on pages 2, 3 and 4 and were suggested by Councilmember Williams. 2///// Lois Peek Attachment 1 a SUPPLEMENTAL INFORI'iu T Ru 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ORDINANCE NO. 88- 920 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO THE DEFINITION, LOCATION AND COMPUTATION OF OPEN SPACE AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, tbe City Council held a public hearing on March 8, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony on this matter and made the following Findings: A. The Zoning Ordinance bas no general definition of Open Space; B. The Zoning Ordinance does not specify how or where Open Space should be counted; C. The proposed Ordinance will provide definition, location and computation for Open Space in conjunction with proposed developments; NOW, THEREFORE, tbe City of Hermosa Beach, California, does bereby ordain amending tbe Zoning Ordinance by adding tbe following language to tbe following Sections: 1. Add tbe following subsection to Article 2. Definitions. Section 272. Open Space. "Areas wbicb are from ground to sky free and clear of any obstructions or obstacles unless otherwise specified within eacb zone classification." Minor obstacles such as telephone and power lines or similar obstacles, and obstructions such as eaves or entryway overhangs, a maximum of 30 inches wide, may encroacb into Open Space areas in tbe R-1 zone." 2. Article 4, R-1, One -Family Residential Zone. Modify the following subsection to Section 4-3. Development Standards, (Subsection) 12. Open Space. The following shall be added. "Required front, and/or side yards, driveways, turning areas, and parking areas shall be excluded from Open Space computation." a. Lots of 2,100 square feet or leas in area shall be allowed a minimum of 300 square feet of open space with a minimum dimension of 7 feet and 33% of tbe open space may be provided in balconies or decks, when all other minimum standards are met. 3. Modify and/or add the following subsections to Article S. R-2, Two -Family Residential Zone. Section 507(4) shall read as follows: "Common Open Space areas may include pools, spas, gardens, play equipment, courtyards (a minimum of 20 feet wide), decks over non -living areas, and/or similar areas but shall not include driveways, turning areas, parking areas and required front, rear, and side yard areas." Section 507(5) shall read as follows: "Private Open Space areas may include patios, pools, spas, and garden areas; also balconies and decks over non -living areas or over living areas_ _ of -. the same dwelling- - unit - when -- accessible through the interior of the dwelling unit and over only the dwelling unit for which there is interior access." Section 507(7) shall read as follows: "When computing Open Space in conjunction with yard areas, only an area which exceeds the minimum required yard area may be counted toward Open Space and only if the overall dimension of the required setback and the exceeding area together has a dimension of at least seven (7) feet in width and length." Section 507(8) shall read as follows: "Circular, triangular, odd and/or unusual shaped Open Space areas shall have a minimum of forty-nine (49) square feet in area as well as minimum seven (7) foot dimensions." Section 507(9) shall read as follows: "Decks, balconies or similar areas which extend over more than one dwelling unit shall have a minimum S.T.C. rating of 58." 4. Modify and/or add the following subsections to Article 5.5, R -2B, Thio -Family Residential Zone. Section 557(4) shall read as follows: "Common Open Space areas may include pools, spas, garden, play equipment, courtyards (a minimum of 20 feet wide), decks over non -living area, and/or similar areas but shall not include driveways, turning areas, parking areas and required front, rear, and side yard areas." Section 557(5) shall read as follows: "Private Open Space areas may include patios, pools, spas, and garden areas; also balconies and decks over non -living areas or over living areas of the same dwelling unit when accessible through the interior of the dwelling unit and over only the dwelling unit for which there is interior access." Section 557(7) shall read as follows: "When computing Open Space in conjunction with yard areas, only an area which exceeds the minimum required yard area may - 2 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 be counted toward Open Space and only if the overall dimension of the required setback and the exceeding area together has a dimension of at least seven (7) feet in width and length." Section 557(8) shall read as follows: "Circular, triangular, odd, and/or unusual shaped Open Space areas shall have a minimum of forty-nine (49) square feet in area as well as minimum seven (7) foot dimensions." Section 557(9) shall read as—follows:— "Decks, balconies or similar areas which extend over more than one dwelling unit shall have a minimum S.T.C. rating of 58." 5. Modify and/or add the following subsections to Article 6, R-3, Multiple Family Residential Zone. Section 607(4) shall read as follows: "Common Open Space areas may include pools, spas, gardens, play equipment, courtyards (a minimum of 20 feet wide), decks over non -living area, and/or similar area but shall not include driveways, turning areas, parking areas, and required front, rear, and side yard areas." Section 607(5) shall read as follows: "Private Open Space areas may include patios, pools, spas, and garden areas; also balconies and decks over non -living areas or over living areas of the same dwelling unit when accessible through the interior of the dwelling unit and over only the dwelling unit for which there is interior access." Section 607(7) shall read as follows: "When computing Open Space in conjunction with yard areas, only an area which exceed the minimum required yard area may be counted toward Open Space and only if the overall dimension of the required setback and the exceeding area together has a dimension of at least seven (7) feet in width and length." Section 607(8) shall read as follows: "Circular, triangular, odd, and/or unusual shaped Open Space areas shall have a minimum of forty-nine (49) square feet in in area as well as minimum seven (7) foot dimensions." Section 607(9) shall read as follows: "Decks, balconies or similar areas which extend over more than one dwelling unit shall have a minimum S.T.C. rating of 58." 6. Modify and add the following subsections to Article 7.2, Condominium, Stock Cooperatives and Community Apartments. - 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 7.2-6. Minimum Design Standards. (E) Recreation Space. "(1) Private: Each unit shall have at least one hundred (100) square feet of private space for a specified unit, in addition to Open Space required by the Zoning Ordinance. Such required recreation space shall have no dimension less than seven (7) feet; the space may be partially covered up to fifty percent (50%). Patio, pool, spa, balcony and a deck area over non -living areas or over living areas of the same dwelling unit when accessible through the interior of the dwelling unit and over only the dwelling unit for which there is interior access. (2) Common: Each development of five (5) or more condominium units all provide one hundred (100) square feet of common recreation area or facility per unit in addition to required common Open Space and private recreation space. The common recreation area may include play area, pool, spa, recreation room, gym, garden and similar amenities for the common use of all owners, but shall not include driveways, turning areas, parking areas, and required front, rear, and side yard areas. When computing recreation space in conjunction with yard areas, only an area which exceeds the minimum required yard area may be counted toward recreation space and only if the overall dimension of the required setback and the exceeding area together has a dimension of at least seven (7) feet in width and length. Circular, triangular, odd, and/or unusual shaped recreation space shall have a minimum of forty-nine (49) square feet in area as well as minimum seven (7) foot dimensions. Decks balconies or similar areas which extend over more than one dwelling unit shall have a minimum S.T.C. rating of 58." 7. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. 8. The City Council shall designate'the City Attorney to prepare a summary of this ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c) (1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of Marek. 1988. o t,i ty ounc an Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: te ty t:`.7:; 1. Location •• • • • a. Address: . 2. b. Legal: Description Am • Space. 3. Sponsor • a. Name: 1 • 11 = 1 • I . • • . in • . $ . 11 . _ • . . Michael Schubach, Planning Director b. Mailing Address: Plannina Departzmult, city of HArmnsa Rpanh •r 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach 90254 Phone:(2l31 376-69A4 .. • NEGATIVE DECLARATION + In accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City of Hermosa beach, which im- plements the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning !fZ'.•-Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposed st`-''`to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it be - Comes final, no comprehensive Enviromnental Impact Report is required for -this project. :Me have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of'this pro- ?lposed project in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City. Council of ;!aeroosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive 'A: Environmental -Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas - ores are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on ;(,be environment. Documentation sup •oring thi f ,'din • is on file in the Building Department. FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE %.4lay 7, 1987 bate of Finding • .;Ne have undertaken and completed an Enviro▪ nmental Impact Review of this pro- .ject in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of'•the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environ - Mental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation measures are 7}ncluded in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the en- r,::.vironment. Documentation supporting this finding s on file in the Build- "Aing Department. Cha man, :nv ron ental Review Committee r FINDING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION June 2, 1987 bate of Finding .y C man, P1ann ng Comm ssio x. FINDING OF THE CITY COUNCIL • We have undertaken and completed an environmental Impact Review of this pro posed project in accordance with Resolution 70-4309 of the City Council of ▪ Hermosa Beach, and find this project does not require a comprehensive En- Vironmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas - urea are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on e env ronment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the ••bate of Finding ., Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council Building Department. • March 24, 1988 City Council Meeting April 12, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-920 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO THE DEFINITION, LOCATION AND COMPUTATION OF OPEN SPACE AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-920 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of March 22, 1988, this ordinance was reintroduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: Creighton, Rosenberger, None None None 'Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88- 920 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO THE DEFINITION, LOCATION AND COMPUTATION OF OPEN SPACE AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 8, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony on this matter and made the following Findings: A. The Zoning Ordinance has no general definition of Open Space; B. The Zoning Ordinance does not specify how or where Open Space should be counted; C. The proposed Ordinance will provide definition, location and computation for Open Space in conjunction with proposed developments; NOW, THEREFORE, tbe City of Hermosa Beacb, California, does bereby ordain amending tbe Zoning Ordinance by adding tbe following language to tbe following Sections: 1. Add tbe following subsection to Article 2. Definitions. Section 272. Open Space. "Areas wbicb are from ground to aky free and clear of any obstructions or obstacles unless otherwise specified within each zone classification." Minor obstacles such as telephone and power lines or similar obstacles, and obstructions sucb as eaves or entryway overbangs, a maximum of 30 inches wide, may encroach into Open Space areas in the R-1 zone." 2. Article 4, 1-1, One -Family Residential Zone. Modify the following subsection to Section 4-3. Development Standards, (Subsection) 12. Open Space. The following shall be added. "Required front, and/or side yards, driveways, turning areas, and parking areas shall be excluded from Open Space computation." a. Lots of 2,100 square feet or less in area shall be allowed a minimum of 300 square feet of open space with a minimum dimension of 7 feet and 33% of tbe open space may be provided in balconies or decks, when all other minimum standards are met. 3. Modify and/or add the following subsections to Article 5. R-2, TVo-Family Residential Zone. Section 507(4) shall read as follows: "Common Open Space areas may include pools, spas, gardens, play equipment, courtyards (a minimum of 20 feet wide), decks over non -living areas, and/or similar areas but shall not include driveways, turning areas, parking areas and required front, rear, and side yard areas." Section 507(5) shall read as follows: "Private Open Space areas may include patios, pools, spas, and garden areas; also balconies and decks over non -living areas or over living areas of the same dwelling unit when accessible through the interior of the dwelling unit and over only the dwelling unit for which there is interior access." Section 507(7) shall read as follows: "When computing Open Space in conjunction with yard areas, only an area which exceeds the minimum required yard area may be counted toward Open Space and only if the overall dimension of the required setback and the exceeding area together has a dimension of at least seven (7) feet in width and length." Section 507(8) shall read as follows: "Circular, triangular, odd and/or unusual shaped Open Space areas shall have a minimum of forty-nine (49) square feet in area as well as minimum seven (7) foot dimensions." Section 507(9) shall read as follows: "Decks, balconies or similar areas which extend over more than one dwelling unit shall have a minimum S.T.C. rating of 58." 4. Modify and/or add the following subsections to Article 5.5, R -2B, Two -Family Residential Zone. Section 557(4) shall read as follows: "Common Open Space areas may include pools, spas, garden, play equipment, courtyards (a minimum of 20 feet wide), decks over non -living area, and/or similar areas but shall not include driveways, turning areas, parking areas and required front,.rear, and side yard areas." Section 557(5) shall read as follows: "Private Open Space areas may include patios, pools, spas, and garden areas; also balconies and decks over non -living areas or over living areas when accessible through the interior of the dwelling unit and over only the dwelling unit for which there is interior access." Section 557(7) shall read as follows: "When computing Open Space in conjunction with yard areas, only an area which exceeds the minimum required yard area may - 2 - be counted toward Open Space and only if the overall dimension of the required setback and the exceeding area together has a dimension of at least seven (7) feet in width and length." Section 557(8) shall read as follows: "Circular, triangular, odd, and/or unusual shaped Open Space areas shall have a minimum of forty-nine (49) square feet in area as well as minimum seven (7) foot dimensions." Section 557(9) shall read as follows: "Decks, balconies or similar areas which extend over more than one dwelling unit shall have a minimum S.T.C. rating of 58." 5. Modify and/or add the following subsections to Article 6, R-3, Multiple Family Residential Zone. Section 607(4) shall read as follows: "Common Open Space areas may include pools, spas,ardens, play equipment, courtyards (a minimum of 20 feet wide, decks over non -living area, and/or similar area but shall not include driveways, turning areas, parking areas, and required front, rear, and side yard areas." Section 607(5) shall read as follows: "Private Open Space areas may include patios, pools, spas, and garden areas; also balconies and decks over non -living areas or over living areas when accessible through the interior of the dwelling unit and over only the dwelling unit for which there is interior access." Section 607(7) shall read as follows: "When computing Open Space in conjunction with yard areas, only an area which exceed the minimum required yard area may be counted toward Open Space and only if the overall dimension of the required setback and the exceeding area together has a dimension of at least seven (7) feet in width and length." Section 607(8) shall read as follows: "Circular, triangular, odd, and/or unusual shaped Open Space areas shall have a minimum of forty-nine (49) square feet in in area as well as minimum seven (7) foot dimensions." Section 607(9) shall read as follows: "Decks, balconies or similar areas which extend over more than one dwelling unit shall have a minimum S.T.C. rating of 58." 6. Modify and add the following subsections to Article 7.2, Condominium, Stock Cooperatives and Community Apartments. - 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 7.2-6. Minimum Design Standards. (E) Recreation Space. "(1) Private: Each unit shall have at least one hundred (100) square feet of private space for a specified unit, in addition to Open Space required by the Zoning Ordinance. Such required recreation space shall have no dimension less than seven (7) feet; the space may be partially covered up to fifty percent (50%). Patio, pool, spa, balcony and a deck area over non -living areas or over living areas when accessible through the interior of the dwelling unit and over only the dwelling unit for which there is interior access. (2) Common: Each development of five (5) or more condominium units shall provide one hundred (100) square feet of common recreation area or facility per unit in addition to required common Open Space and private recreation space. The common recreation area may include play area, pool, spa, recreation room, gym, garden and similar amenities for the common use of all owners, but shall not include driveways, turning areas, parking areas, and required front, rear, and side yard areas. When computing recreation space in conjunction with yard areas, only an area which exceeds the minimum required yard area may be counted toward recreation space and only if the overall dimension of the required setback and the exceeding area together has a dimension of at least seven (7) feet in width and length. Circular, triangular, odd, and/or unusual shaped recreation space shall have a minimum of forty-nine (49) square feet in area as well as minimum seven (7) foot dimensions. - Decks balconies or similar areas which extend over more than one dwelling unit shall have a minimum S.T.C. rating of 58." 7. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. 8. The City Council shall designate the City Attorney to prepare a summary of this ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c) (1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records. of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of March, 1988. R o t o ty ounc an "� `� o t e ty Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CI PROVED A FORM: CLERK ITY ATTORNEY t.a. 1:t • Location a. Address:_ Ci v -wide, City of_ Hermosa Beach, ca-9a2S4 b. Legal: - 2. Description Am • Space. 3. Sponsor a. Name: IP . II - • . s• 1 . ._ . in • , . , • II . Michael Schubach, Plannina Director • . • • . - b. Mailing Address: Plannina Deoar. City of HErmesa Reach • 1315 Va11ev Drive, Hermosa Beach 90254 Phone:oi 176-F9AA NEGATIVE DECLARATION a In accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City of Hermosa beach, which im- plements the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all '; private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning =' •- Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposed ='to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it be - Comes final, no comprehensive Environnental Impact Report is required for this project. • FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE _-.;.Ne have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review ofthis pro - ''posed project in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City. Council of ;::=,`permoea Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental -Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas- • 4= urea are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation sup •oring thi- f 'din • is on file in the ;;Building Department. `•-'May 71_1987 bate of Finding Cha man, :nv ron ental Review Committee r FINDING OF THE PLANNINNG COMMISSION • . Ate have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro- .ject in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach• and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environ- mental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation measures are -.included in the pro est, it would not have a significant effect on the en- vironment. Document -if -fon supporting this finding son file in the Build- -ing Department. June 2, 1987 bate of Finding C arman, Plann-ng Commissio FINDING OF THE CITY COUNCIL • We have undertaken and completed an environmental Impact Review of this pro . posed project in accordance with Resolution 70-4309 of the City Council of ' Hermosa Beach, and find this project does not require a comprehensive En- vironmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas - Urea are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on .' the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the • Building Department. *bate of Finding Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council March 24, 1988 City Council Meeting April 12, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-922 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 2-12.16, ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL. Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-922 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of March 22, 1988, introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: Creighton, None None None this ordinance was Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager rb • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88- 922 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 2-2.16. ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL. WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to adopt rules to expedite the transaction of the business of the Council in an orderly fashion; and WHEREAS, Section 54954.3 of the California Government Code authorizes that the legislative body may adopt reasonable regula- tions limiting the total amount of time allocated for public testimony on particular issues and fot Vach individual speaker; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution N0. 86-5001 on December 16, 1986, and has been following the policy of allowing three (3) minutes per person per session and a total of fifteen (15) minutes per subject per session; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2-2.16. Addressing the council. shall be amended as follows: (a) Manner of addressing council. Each person desiring to address the council shall step up to the microphone in front of the rail, shall be asked to state his name and address for the record, state the subject he wishes to discuss, state whom he is representing if he represents an organization or other persons, and unless further time is granted by majority vote of th council, shall limit his el remarks to three (3) minutes total amount of fifteen (15) minutes per subject pe sessio All remarks shall be addressed to thT council as a whol and not any member thereof. No question shall be asked a councilperson or a member of the city staff without the permission of the presiding officer. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and operation from and after thirty days after its final passage and adoption. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption Of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of Original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City COuncil at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS—._ DAT OF , 1988 ATTEST: SI N O e C y punt , and MAYOR Of Hermosa Beach. City Clerk PPROVED AS T City Attorney 2 i HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Apv, rki I April 4, 1988 Regular Meeting of April 12, 1988 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #18835 (C.U.P. CON NO. 87-7) LOCATION: 1026 SUNSET DRIVE APPLICANT: OLGUIN & RUTHERFORD/MCTAVISH REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #18835 which is consistent with the Tentative Parcel Map approved on August 4, 1987 by the Planning Commission. It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the the attached Resolution and 2. Find that this project will not violate of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, Subdivision Map Act. 3. Find that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code. the Final Map. any of the provisions and 66474.6 of the 4. Find that the development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land. 5. Find that the approval of said map shall be subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commision Resolution No. 87- 46, adopted after public hearing on August 4, 1987. 6. Instruct the City Clerk to endorse on the face of Final Parcel Map #18835 the certificate which embodies the approval of said map. icA%P°� Michael Schubach Planning Director Kevin N`orthc;aft City Manager Res • f lly submitted, An•rew Pere Associate Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #18835 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1026 SUNSET DRIVE, HERMO- SA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, on August 4, 1987, the Planning Commission approved the Tentative Parcel Map; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #18835 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 27, Tract 1516, as recorded in Book 25, Page 39 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los An- geles, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 1026 Sunset Drive, Hermosa Beach, California. 2. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act. 3. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code. 4. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land. 5. The approval of said map shall be subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 87-46, adopted after public hearing on August 4, 1987. 6. The City Council hereby instructs the City Clerk to endorse on the face of the map the certificate which embodies the approval of said map. - 1 - .._Cas-5�.�.14141»• 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of April, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermo- sa Beach, California. ATTEST: Earkgrauttb Mairr-ittis THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON. Director March 10, 1988 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA. CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: (818) 458-5100 The City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Council Members: PARCEL MAP NO. 18835 ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA. CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE* L-1 The subject map has been checked by the City Engineer and is ready for your approval. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR COUNCIL: 1. Approve the map. 2. Make findings as follows: a. That this project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act. b. That the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the general plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code. 3. Instruct the City Clerk to endorse on the face of the map of Parcel Map No. 18835 the certificate which embodies the approval of said map. Please return the signed original tracing to the Subdivision Section, Land Development Division, Department of Public Works, for processing and filing with the Registrar -Recorder of the County of Los Angeles. Very truly yours, T. A. TIDEMANSON City Engineer Donald Y. Milne Deputy City Engineer EVER:kc Attachments cc: City Clerk Director of Public Works HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #18813 (C.U.P. CON NO. LOCATION: 1134 SUNSET DRIVE APPLICANT: OLGUIN & RUTHERFORD/MCTAVISH REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 2 -UNIT April 4, 1988 Regular Meeting of April 12, 1988 87-6) CONDOMINIUM PROJECT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #18813 which is consistent with the Tentative Parcel Map approved on August 4, 1987 by the Planning Commission. It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the the attached Resolution and the Final Map. 2. Find that this project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act. 3. Find that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code. 4. Find that the development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land. 5. Find that the approval of said map shall be subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commision Resolution No. 87- 47, adopted after public hearing on August 4, 1987. 6. Instruct the City Clerk to endorse on the face of Final Parcel Map #18813 the certificate which embodies the approval of said map. CONC Michael Schubach Planning DArector evin Northcraft City Manager Res ectful ubmitted, An•rew Per Associate lanner 12d 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #18813 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1134 SUNSET DRIVE, HERMO- SA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, on August 4, 1987, the Planning Commission approved the Tentative Parcel Map; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #18813 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot .11, Tract 1851, as recorded in Book 25, Page 40 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los An- geles, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 1134 Sunset Drive, Hermosa Beach, California. 2. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act. 3. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design andimprovement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code. 4. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land. 5. The approval of said map shall be subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 87-47, adopted after public hearing on August 4, 1987. 6. The City Council hereby instructs the City Clerk to endorse on the face of the map the certificate which embodies the approval of said map. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of April, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermo- sa Beach, California. ATTEST: c T6 arkgrnun ki filatrr.iatB .6 THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Director March 10, 1988 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: (818) 458-5100 The City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE: L-1 Dear Council Members: PARCEL MAP NO. 18813 The subject map has been checked by the City Engineer and is ready for your approval. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR C CUNCI L : 1. Approve the map. 2. Make findings as follows: a. That this project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act. b. That the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the general plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code. 3. Instruct the City Clerk to endorse on the face of the map of Parcel Map No. 18813 the certificate which embodies the approval of said map. Please return the signed original tracing to the Subdivision Section, Land Development Division, Department of Public Works, for processing and filing with the Registrar -Recorder of the County of Los Angeles. Very truly yours, T. A. TIDEMANSON City Engineer fx-mgacto4 2/14)2•4<g - Donald Y. Mil e Deputy City Engineer NOR: kc Attachments cc: City Clerk Director of Public Works 1 April 4, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1988 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION NOT TO MERGE LOTS - GROUPS LM 87-3 LOCATION/ 1276 9TH STREET OWNER: MARTHA B. NORTHUP 1137 9TH STREET R.N. PINEDA INITIATED BY MAYOR ETTA SIMPSON Recommendation Staff recommends the following: 1. 1137 9th street - merge the lots on appeal pursuant to Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-29 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. 2. 1276 9th Street - merge the lots into two parcels since the applicant can create two parcels which conform to zoning regulations. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of March 1, 1988, approved the appeal request not to merge the subject lots. Abstract The Planning Commission decision will allow the property owners to create substandard parcels rather than merging the lots as intended by the Lot Merger Ordinance. Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 87-3 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 80% of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. The parcels located on 9th Street are on a block where 23% of the lots have been developed with 25' wide lots. The property owners were notified of the appeal by certified mail. 1 Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt the subject properties from being subject to merger, however, 1276 9th Street should be allowed to be merged into two parcels. 1276 9th Street has an 85' street frontage and is 8500 square feet, including the 10' Reynolds Lane dedication, and allows for the creation of two parcels conforming to zoning requirements. Additional background and analysis is provided in the attached Planning Commission staff report of February 16, 1988. Attachments 1. Resolution No. 88- 2. PC staff report of 3/1/88 3. PC minutes of 3/1/88 4. Background a. Letter from Mayor Simpson requesting appeal b. Letter to property owners with notification of appeal c. Lot Merger Letter 1 d. Intent to Merge Lot e. Appeal of Intent to Merge Lot from Property Owners f. Tax Assessor's Map g. Aerials fr Michaer chubach Planning Director 'Kevin Northcraft City Manager 2 Res AjP A " rea Submitted, Associa Planner RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON APPEAL THE MERGER OF LOTS COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1137 9TH STREET AND APPROVE THE MERGER OF--1-2-7-6--M-STREEr INTO TWO PARCELS WHICH CONFORM TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 12, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following Findings: A. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of March 1, 1988, approved, on appeal from the property owners, the unmerger of the subject lots; B. Section 29.5-19 through 29.5-29 of the Zoning Ordinance perscribes the procedures for the merger of parcels; C. The City Council finds all these parcels to be consistent with the criteria for merger: 1. The main structure is sited on contiguous parcels. 2. Not more than 80% of the. lots have been unmerged and developed separately. 3. One of the contiguous parcels comprises less than 4000 square feet. 4. The contiguous parcels are held under common ownership. D. The parcels are legally described as follows: 1276 9th S eet - Lot 38, :nd ', Bl .c 1143R� ills 2. 1137 9th Street - Lots 11 and 12, Block 144, Redondo Villa Tract; E. The merger of these parcels will preserve the character of the existing neighborhoods by maintaining current densities and preserving public on -street parking; 1276 9th Street is large enoug o"create two parcel o at st 4'00 square feet ith mini im str!it frenta a of 40 fee —3-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that City of Hermosa Beach, California, mer:er 1 9th Street. reet into two parce the City Council of the does hereby approve the th PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this n ng day of March, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK PPROVED TO FORM: i..._ i TY A T Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission February 23, 1988 Regular Meeting of March 1, 1988 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF INTENT TO MERGE LOTS GROUP: LM 87-3 1100-1200 BLOCK OF 9TH AND 10TH STREET REQUEST: TO MAINTAIN PARCELS AS TWO OR MORE LOTS LOCATION: SUBJECT ADDRESS, OWNER, LEGAL DESCRIPTION, ASSESSORS NUMBER 1137 9th Street R.N. Pineda Lots 11 and 12 Block 144 Redondo Villa Tract 4161029010 1214 10th Street Wm. & Margaret Simas Lots 43, 44, and 45 Block 144 Redondo Villa Tract 4161028006 AND 1276 9th Street Martha B. Northup Lots 37, 38, & 39 Block 14$ Redondo Villa Tract 4161030012 Recommendation 1) To deny the applicants' request to maintain their parcels as two or more separate lots at 1214 10th Street and 1137 9th Street. 2) To allow the applicant to merge the lots and create two parcels of at least 4000 square feet with a minimum frontage of 40 feet. Background LOT MERGER GROUP 87-3 - Notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed on December 30, 1987 - Number of notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed - 33 - Number of hearing requests for appeals received - 3 Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 87-3 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 8070 of the block has been splitand the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. The following information is provided for the specific sites. 5 19 1137 9th Street - The parcel is comprised of two 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure staddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single family dwelling. '0n August 12, 1986, the owner was granted a demolition permit for the existing structure and was granted 2 permits for the construction of single family dwellings on July 22, 1986. The applicant has not initiated the demolition and/or construction thus, the permits have expired. 1214 10th Street - The parcels are comprised of three 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structures staddle the property lines. Building records indicate this structure is a single family dwelling. 1276 9th Street - This parcel is comprised of three 25' by 100' lots. The main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure to be a single family dwelling. The City of Redonodo Beach has vacated Reynolds Lane and have dedicated 10 feet of Reynolds Lane to the owner of 1276 9th Street. Therefore, the 10 foot dedication, combined with the total area of the three lots, creates a parcel of 8500 square feet. 8500 square feet is enough area to create two parcels conforming to zoning requirements with each parcel maintaining a minimum frontage of 40 feet. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt 1 7 9th Street and 1214 10th Street from being subject to — rger. 41) An Per Mic ael Schu Planning Director Attachments: 1. Lot Merger Letter 1 2. Intent to Merge Lots 3. Requests for appeals 4. Tax Assessor's Map 5. Aerials 6 Associate P anner c c APPEAL OF LOT MERGER DETERMINATION FOR LOT MERGER GROUP L.M. 87-3 Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated February 23, 1988. For Lot Merger Group 87-3, the Notification of Intent to Merge Lots was mailed on December 30, 1987. 33 notifications were mailed, and three hearing requests for appeals were received. The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in L.M. 87-3 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 80 percent of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. Staff cannot find a reason to exempt 1137 9th Street and 1214 10th Street from being subject to the merger. 1137 9th Street: -- Owner: R. N. Pineda. Lots 11 and 12, Block 144, Redondo Villa Tract, 4161029010. (Owner did not appear.) Mr. Schubach noted that the owner received notification of this hearing; however, no further word has been received from Mr. Pineda on this matter. The parcel is comprised of two 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single-family dwelling. On August 12, 1986, the owner was granted a demolition permit for the existing structure and was granted two permits for the construction of a single-family dwelling on July 22, 1986. The applicant has not initiated the demolition and/or construction; therefore, the permits have expired. 1214 10th Street: -- Owners: William and Margaret Simas. Lots 43, 44, and 45, Block 144, Redondo Villa Tract, 4161028006. 7 PC Minutes 3/1/88 C C The parcels are comprised of three 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property lines. Building records indicate this structure is a single-family dwelling. Mr. Simas, 1214 10th Street, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and asserted that he was not properly notified of the intent to merge his lots. He based his assertion on the following: (a) notice was sent to his attorney, not directly to him; (b) notification had only his name appearing on it, but his wife is also an owner and her name should have appeared on the letter; (c) there was not adequate time to respond to the letter by the time it was forwarded to him by the attorney. He concluded by stating that he does not want his lots to be merged. Wilma Burt, 1152 7th Street, Hermosa Beach, stressed that the letter was sent to the attorney, not directly to the Simas', the property owners of record; therefore, there has not been a proper legal noticing in this matter. Mr. Lough explained the legal requirements for this type of action. He stated that appearing at the hearing proves that an owner has been notified and is therefore waiving the right to object on the grounds of improper noticing. Mr. Lough stated that the hearing was requested by the attorney who received the letter on behalf of both property owners. Comm. Ingell questioned whether it is notification. Comm. Peirce stated that both owners went to both Mr. and Mrs. Simas. necessary for both property owners to receive were notified, stating that the notice of intent Mr. Lough stated that the item can be continued if the Commission feels there are any doubts regarding the proper notification of this particular merger. Ms. Burt asserted that this issue was not notified properly. Further, the names of both owners should appear on the noticing. Comm. Peirce stressed that the owner was notified in a proper manner. He further noted that reprographic copies are available which show the noticing to be proper and that the receipt for certified mail was obtained. Mr. Lough explained that the original notice went to the property owner by certified mail, which is the requirement. A letter was then sent to the City by the Simas' attorney. The City mailed a response back to the attorney. At this point, a response does not have to go by certified mail. He noted that, whether Ms. Burt is correct or not in her assumption that the matter was incorrectly notified, she still has the right to challenge the action. The Planning Commission then has the right to weigh the information in determining whether or not the matter should be continued. Chmn. Compton felt that the matter was properly notified; however, he did not object to a continuance of the matter if the applicant so desires. He noted, however, that the owner had only 13 days in which to respond, and the law entitles an owner 14 days. Mr. Simas further objected to the fact that the original letter had an incorrect address on it. PC Minutes 3/1/88 C C Comm. Peirce stressed that, in looking at a copy of the notice, the correct address appears on the face of the notice. Comm. Peirce stated that he would object to any continuance beyond two weeks, noting that he felt the original notice was proper. He felt that two weeks would be an adequate length of time for the applicant to prepare for the hearing. He could see no deficiencies whatsoever in the noticing. MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to continue this item to the Planning Commission meeting of March 15, 1988. No objections; so ordered. 1276 9th Street: Owner: Martha B. Northrup. Lots 37, 38, and 39, Block 143, Redondo Villa Tract, 4161030012. This parcel is comprised of three 25' by 100' lots. The main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure to be a single-family dwelling. The City of Redondo Beach has vacated Reynolds Lane and have dedicated ten feet of Reynolds Lane to the owner of 1276 9th Street. Therefore, the ten -foot dedication, combined with the total area of the three lots, creates a parcel of 8500 square feet. 8500 square feet is enough to create two parcels conforming to zoning requirements with each parcel maintaining a minimum frontage of 40 feet. Martha Northrup, 1276 9th Street, Hermosa Beach, stated that the hearing notice incorrectly identifies her Block as 144; it is actually Block 143. Ms. Northrup stated that she strongly objects to having her lots merged. She stated that the ten -foot street dedication has enlarged her property. She felt that there should be an exception to the merger of her lots. She felt that merger would affect her property value. Ms. Northrup and Chmn. Compton discussed the issue of the ten -foot dedication. Chmn. Compton explained to the owner what the merger would accomplish. Chmn. Compton stated that he has expressed his views in regard to owners who do not want their lots merged. He stated that he does not want to see development of 19 -foot homes on 25 -foot lots, particularly since it destroys the street parking. He felt that two units should be allowed on two legal lots; but the type of development should in some way be required to allow two units, such as one unit in front and one unit in back so that it precludes the inadequate street parking which sometimes occurs. Comm. Peirce noted that his view remains the same on the lot mergers, stating that if they meet the criteria, they should be merged. He noted, however, that the Northrup property at 1276 9th Street differs from the other properties in this lot merger group. Comm. Rue concurred with the comments made by Chmn. Compton in regard to the parking and visual effect if these lots are merged. He felt that if someone protests the lot merger, that is an adequate reason to not merge the lots, noting that the lots were purchased as two lots and should be allowed to remain as two lots if so desired. He could not condone the City merging lots against the wishes of the owner. Comm. Rue commented that he would like to discuss the issue of design criteria to encourage others types of construction on these types of lots. PC Minutes 3/1/88 ( C MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Chmn. Compton to not merge the lots at 1137 9th Street. Comm. Peirce noted that the majority of citizens, as well as the City Council, appear to favor the lot mergers. He felt that the City is going about this issue backwards, in that the Planning Commission is voting politically, and the City Council is voting planning. Churn. Compton disagreed, stating that this issue has arisen because of the development of these particular types of lots. Comm. Peirce stated that the lot merger ordinance is designed to maintain the neighborhoods in the density condition in which they exist today. By not merging lots, the neighborhoods will be forced to change. Comm. Ingell noted concern that more citizens have not appeared to address this issue. AYES: Comms. Ingell, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. DeBellis Chmn. Compton felt that the notice sent out by the City is very intimidating for most citizens. He asked for an update on what happened at the last Council meeting in regard to the issue of the letters being sent out. Mr. Lough stated that the City Council did not feel the notices are intimidating. He stated that official notices from the City are always apt to cause citizens to take pause. Mr. Schubach noted that the letter was approved by the City Council.. Comm. Rue noted that the Planning Commission has been given the authority by the State to not merge these lots if an owner does not want them merged. Therefore, he felt that it is well within the purview of the Commission to grant the wishes of those property owners who do not want to be merged. Comm. Ingell agreed, stating that if the State did not want the Planning Commission to have such authority, the State would not have given it to the Commission. MOTION by Chmn. Compton, seconded by Comm. Ingell, to not merge the lots at 1276 9th Street. AYES: Comms. Ingell, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. DeBellis Comm. Rue stated that not only is the rationale of his decision to maintain the rights of property owners, but also in looking at the aerials, most if not all of the lots in these areas have been built out to 25 -foot units. He did not see three or four extra units making a significant impact. He fully supports the density proposition EE; however, he felt that people's rights take precedence. Comm. Peirce noted that one of the conditions for merger is if the block is 80 percent built to standard, the lots should not be merged. Staff has not found this to be the case -10 - PC Minutes 3/1/88 is these particular instances. Therefore, either staff is incorrect, or the issue needs to be readdressed. He •noted that staff has asserted that these lots do not meet the requirements for not being merged. Mr. Schubacli discussed the criteria for merging, stating that staff is trying to determine the blocks where the percentages are below the 80 percent requirement. He stated that that information can be included in future staff reports. - (1 - PC Minutes 3/1/88 c Tattchgrounit C City of rmosaTeach� Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 March 10,,1988 City Clerk Midstokke City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear City Clerk Midstokke: dab) MAR 1 01988► 1 �J City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach • I request an appeal to the City Council from the decision to unmerge 2 lots made by the Planning Commission on March 1, 1988. Sincerel , Etta Simpson Mayor le tie eerf,Atete 4/P- 1 AY City Hall (213) 3766984 • Community Center 379-33121376-6984 • Fire Department 376-2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 3767981 /376-6984 -- 1Z- c March 23, 1988 c Citi of 1%rmosaTeaclt_) Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885 Martha B. Northup 1276 9th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: Appeal to the City Council of Hermosa Beach of Planning Commission decision - to not merge Lots 37, 38, and 39, Block 143, Redondo Villa Tract, commonly known as 1276 9th Street Dear Ms. Northup An appeal of the Planning Commission decision on March 1, 1988 - not to merge the above mentioned lots - has been filed by Etta Simpson, Mayor of Hermosa Beach, and has been submitted to the City Clerk. A Public Hearing before the Hermosa Beach City Council has been set for April 12, 1988 at 8:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. This hearing will be held in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive. If you wish any written evidence to be considered by the City Council at this meeting, we request that it reach the Planning Department by noon on Tuesday, April 5, 1988 for inclusion in the City Council agenda packets. A staff report .may be , obtained on/or about April 10, 1988 from the Planning Department. If you have any questions regarding this matter please call (213) 376-6984. Sin ely, An •� w - ' Associat! Planner City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379-3312 / 376-6984 • Fire Department 376-2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 376-7981 / 376.6984 -L3- i- q C Citi o f 1%rmosaTeacly Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 a March 23, 1988 R.N. Pineda P.O. Box 5025 Torrance, CA 90510 RE: Appeal to the City Council of Hermosa Beach of Planning Commission decision - to not merge Lots 11 and 12, Block 144, Redondo Villa Tract, commonly known as 1137 9th Street Dear Mr. Pineda An appeal of the Planning Commission decision on March 1, 1988 - not to merge the above mentioned lots - has been filed by Etta Simpson, Mayor of Hermosa Beach, and has been submitted to the City Clerk. A Public Hearing before the Hermosa Beach City Council has been set for April 12, 1988 at 8:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. This hearing will be held in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive. If you wish any written evidence to be considered by the City Council at this meeting, we request that it reach the Planning Department by noon on Tuesday, April 5, 1988 for inclusion in the City Council agenda packets. A staff report may be,obtained on/or about April 10, 1988 from the Planning Department. If you have any questions regarding this matter please call (213) 376-6984. Si rely An ew '`mea Associat: Planner City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379-3312/376-6984 • Fire Department 376-2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 376-7981 / 376-6984 4 �„ �; ► • h _A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DETERMINE WHETHER LOTS SHALL BE MERGED 110 - Citi of .2-lermosarl3eachv Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: Dear Property Owner: The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach intends to determine if the parcels described above shall be merged into one parcel according to Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. When two or more lots merge, they become a single parcel to be developed, sold, leased, or financed together. Sections 29.5-20 and 29.5-21 allow lots to be merged if two or more contiguous parcels of land are held by the same owner where the following occur: 1. The parcels were created under the provisions the City's Subdivision Ordinance or any prior state law or ordinance regulating the division of land, or which were not subject to any prior law regulating the division of land. 2. At least one of the contiguous parcels or units of land held by the same owner does not conform to standards for minimum parcel size to permit use, or development under the City's Zoning and/or Subdivision Ordinance. 3. The main structure is partially sited on the contiguous parcel and not more than 80% of the lots on the same block of the affected parcel have been split and developed separately. 4. One or more of the following conditions exist with respect to one or more of the contiguous parcels: a. Comprises less than 4000 square feet in area at the time of the determination of merger. b. Was not created in compliance with applicable laws and ordinances in effect at the time of the creation. • •?* c. Does not meet current standards for sewage disposal and domestic water supply. d. Does not meet slope stability standards. e. Has no legal access which is adequate for vehicular and safety equipment access and maneuverability. f. It's development would create health or safety hazards. g. Is inconsistant with the applicable General Plan and any applicable specific plan, other than minimum lot size or density standards. Information available to the City of Hermosa Beach indicates that your property meets the criteria for merger. If you wish to present evidence that the property does not meet the criteria for merger, you may schedule a bearing before the Planning Commission. Your written request for a bearing must be received by the Planning Department within 30 days from the date of this notice. With your request for a.hearing, please include a letter stating the reasons why the property is not eligible for merger. It is the property owner's responsibility to provide a site survey if one is needed to determine the exact location of property lines. If you request a bearing, you will be sent.a letter stating the date, time, and location of the hearing. If you do not request a hearing, a determination of whether or not to merge the parcels will be made by•the Planning Department within 60 days of the date of this Notice. A copy of the attached "Intention to`Merge Lots" form has been filed with the Los Angeles County Recorder. A Notice of the outcome will be sent to you, and a copy will be filed with the Los Angeles County Recorder. If you have questions regarding this matter, please contact the Planning Department at (213) 376-6984. SI rel Andrew rea• Associat Planner -(6- January 6, 1988 City of Hermosa Beach Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attention: Andrew Perea Associate Planner Dear flr. Perea, I request to stop all action on the following property with the legal description lot 11 and lot 12, block 144, Redondo Villa Tract, until a proper hearing on this subject takes place. Please advise me on such a date convenient to both of us. Please reply as soon as possible. Yours truly, R. to. Pineda cc: Law Office of Tim Moore & Associates JAN 1 1 1988 C � 1276 Ninth Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 January 25, 1988 To: Hermosa Beach Planning Dept. 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 RE: Lots 37, 38 and 39, Block 144, Redondo Villa Tract Dear Sirs, Having received the certified letter from your department about the pending lot merging, I am responding that I feel my situation may require special consideration. The Reynolds Lane right of way has been officially vacated as of 1987. This land is contiguous and parallel to my property on the east side, creating an additional area -- my portion being 10 ft. by 100 ft. or 1000 sq. ft. Therefore, my property should now be considered 8500sc�. ft. in area, or, after merging, two parcels that can be developed, sold, leased or financed. Enclosed please find a copy of the Redondo Beach City Council's Resolution #6777 to vacate the Reynolds Lane right of way which was passed and adopted June 16, 1987. I am hereby requesting a hearing on this matter in the near future. Yours truly, Martha B. Northup -4? JAN 23 1988 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF REDONDO BEACH ) I, JOHN OLIVER, City Clerk of the City of Redondo Beach, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution, being Resolution No. 6777, was passed and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 16th day of June, 1987; thereafter signed and approved by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk of said city, and that said resolution was adopted by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Horrell, Martin, Snow and Cawdrey; NOES: None; ABSENT: Councilmember Chapman. (SEAL) City Clerk of the City of Redondo Beach, California RESOLUTION NO. 6777 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA, VACATING A PORTION OF REYNOLDS LANE RIGHT OF WAY NOT REQUIRED FOR STREET OR HIGHWAY PURPOSES AND RESERVING UTILITY EASEMENTS THEREON WHEREAS, Streets and Highway Code 8334 provides that a city may summarily vacate an excess right of way not used or required in for street purposes without public notice and hearing; WHEREAS, a portion of Reynolds Lane lying between Speyer Lane was originally set aside for street purposes. WHEREAS, this portion of Reynolds Lane between Lane has not been used for street purposes Speyer the future Haynes Lane and Haynes Lane and in the past and is unnecessary for prospective street purposes; WHEREAS, this small area of dedicated street easement has not been well maintained and has not been useful to the adjacent property owners, who - own the underlying fee; WHEREAS, vacation of this right of way will enable the owners of the property underlying the dedicated easement to beneficially use and maintain the property; WHEREAS, the summary street vacation procedure is set forth in Chapter 4, Part 3, Division 9, of the Streets and Highway Code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Redondo Beach, as follows: SECTION 1. That these proceedings are taken under Chapter 4 of the California Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 2. That the Mayor and City Council finds from all evidence submitted that the hereinafter described portion of property lying between Haynes Lane and Speyer Lane containing 4,336 square feet, in the City of Redondo Beach has not been used for street purposes and is unnecessary for such purposes in the future, and is, therefore, excess right of way of a street not required for street purposes. SECTION 3. That portion of Reynolds Lane which is hereinafter described, is abandoned and vacated. The vacated and abandoned property is generally shown on the Map attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and more particularly described as follows, and referred to as "the property:" Those portions of Reynolds Lane, in the City of Redondo Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as shown on Redondo Villa Tract, recorded in Book 10, Pages 90 and 91 of Maps, in the office of the recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner, Block 143 of said Redondo Villa Tract; thence North along the easterly line of said Block 143, N 9° 15' 00" W., 200 feet to the Northeast, corner of said Block 143; thence N 80° 45' 00" E., 20 feet to the Northwest cornerfof Block 138 of said Tract; thence southerly along the westerly line of said Block 138, S 9° 15' 00" E., 216.80 feet; thence N 59° 13' 11" W., 26.12 feet to the point of Beginning. SECTION 4. That from and after the effective date of this resolution that portion of Reynolds Lane described herein no longer constitutes a street. SECTION 5. The City reserves the right at any time to enter onto or upon said property to construct, maintain, operate, replace, remove, and renew sanitary sewers and storm drains and appurtenant structures in, upon, C � over, and across the property, and pursuant to any existing franchise or renewals thereof, or otherwise, to construct, maintain, operate, replace, remove, renew and enlarge lines of pipe, conduits, cables, wires, poles, and other convenient structures, equipment and fixtures for the operation of gas pipelines, telegraphic and telephone lines, railroad lines, and for the transportation or distribution of electric energy, petroleum and its products, ammonia, and water, and for incidental purposes, including access to protect such works from all hazards in, upon, and over the property together with all reservations and exceptions as shown on the map of Redondo Villa Tract, filed in Book 10, pages 90 and 91, of Maps, in the office of the Registrar -Recorder of said County. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, shall enter the same in the Book of Resolutions of said City, and shall cause the action of the Mayor and City Council in adopting the same to be entered in the official minutes of said City Council. Passed, approved, and adopted this 16th day of June , 1987. Mayor . ATTEST: 1 .i r .a' Ci ty' Cl erk (SEAL) ,/ This is certified to-be- ar.d ccrrect a true on ;..lam end copy of the original Cit-rof the City °u Beach, State of f California /f7 edondo ti "L HAYNES REDON DO V 1 L.L.A. TRACT t�1. B.10-90-91 .4T. Sc-:: EXHIBIT "A" -.23- LN. __ .. .._ -.. �; � � .: •. . :;� ,..-1 • ,'�. ri �, ; TJ-{ E ; .N 0 M E:,,Fu :i...a.as �fi x f .4em 7w ate, 12 - . Bt K t43"= 38�a. 9REMDO DO e l$,:t. ��\C .. .Si .o4 R, a .Nty, ... b.x'J �Uil .at • c WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Hermosa Beach Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 JAN 1319 G:• •.••• v M v/ ✓vv u111C.:11L I%Crlot/161MS �-88-7466i Has not been compared with original, Original will be returned when processing has been completed. LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGISTRAR - RECORDER NOTICE OF INTENT TO MERGE LOTS Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach intends .to determine if the following described lots are eligible for merger pursuant to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Sections 66451.11-66451.21. Assessor's No: 4161029010 Property Owner: R.N. PINEDA P.O. BOX 5025 TORRANCE, CA 90510 Legal Description: LOT 11 AND LOT 12 BLOCK 144 REDONDO VILLA TRACT A Notice of the outcome of the decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission will be mailed to be recorded with the deeds of the above mentioned lots within 120 days of the date of this instrument. Questions regarding this matter may be addressed to the Hermosa Beach Planning Deparment at (213) 376-6984. CITY OF HERMO A BEACH erea e Planner At ew Associa DATE December 29, 1987 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On this 29th day of December, 1987, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, personally appeared Andrew Peres, personally known to be the Associate Planner of the City of Hermosa Beach and known to me to be the person who executed the instrument on behalf of the City. of Hermosa Beach and acknowledged to me that such City of Hermosa Beach executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. *60/A -J (FREE RECORDING IS RE1(7.. Q TED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 - BENEFITS CITY AND IS OFFICIAL CITY BUSINESS) . OFFICIA'. SEAL Kathleen L. Reviczky "13=1J"'itj NOlwrt'. 0118uC ' ALIFOWNI. ;;// LOS ANGELES COUNTY :Tiles!' My Commission Expires Sept. 16, 191 L ( JAN 131988 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Hermosa Beach Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CO Y of Document Recorded original. Ace Has no een com a Original W'llbe returned when has been comp tom" LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGISTRAR processing GE LOTS Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach intends to determine if the following described lots are eligible for merger pursuant to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Sections 66451.11-66451.21. Assessor's No: 4161030012 Property Owner: MARTHA B NORTHUP 1276 9TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Legal Description: LOT 37, LOT 38, AND LOT 39 BLOCK 144 REDONDO VILLA TRACT A Notice.of the outcome of the decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission will be mailed to be recorded with the deeds of the above mentioned lots within 120 days of the date of this instrument. Questions regarding this matter may be addressed to the Hermosa Beach Planning Deparment at (213) 376-6984. CITY OF HERMOSBEACH (ea BY44/2— Anch-�w P Associat Planner DATE December 29, 1987 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On this 29th day of December, 1987, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, personally appeared Andrew Perea, personally known to be the Associate Planner of the City of Hermosa Beach and known to me to be.the person who executed the instrument on behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach and acknowledged to me that such City of Hermosa Beach executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (FREE 27383 OFFICIAL SEAL Kathleen L. Reviczky NOIp,+. ouNUC C4UinWNlp• LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Commission Expires Sept. 16, 1938 SEAL RECORDING IS REQUEST D PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION - BENEFITS CITY AND IS OFFICIAL CITY BUSINESS) - z6- . • 1986 • r • l., - G 9 TH. 0 2S c. 13 —53 0 nO 20 25 24 52 v 8TH. 21 ZS 51 22 /g 50 23 14 49 i 24 ,I 48 25 47 s t 0 •26 k /6 46 Z6 27 11 11 45 BLK. 143 N. BO'45 E.. 28 44 zB 29 01 43 30 14 • 42 31 11 22 41 a 32 11 21 40 33 „ ST. 34 14 ST. 35 11 3 62 ZS • SPEYER LN. 23 0 J 0 W tC 20 HAYNES LN. Cordo VIIla, Track 01na. 10-q0-cij • nv/11,1 ,a, -tui WO, n4, �, + 'P. • u H .mimml•••••••••1•••••••••/ Qj I O TH. 112 !. ,iid �I97) ST. U 24.74 J,li7,w �0 21 '"" 1 — 61.57...... 3e • 22 d6 36 23 n 3 1254 36— 25 r0 0 53 131.....K. ,N 52. G 51 m 50 ED 25 8 49 _ @ 48 25 8(...1" 470 25 �.� in ,RS2O,°. O .4 ii . '" 9717 1590,° SO 5 i� 09 76sem, 25 25 , ' m' '; : , .:r ,.' :.i'. -;.; i r, �. 4., 4 . +'1 - - - l...... 7'1 v _ 13 - 25 i9 14 2�. %o � lb I 115 io i /5 25 16 Z5 ZO U U 17 - ZS . /? I.MO.°•O 6 -O 122 39 0 72.39 'n J,2J0,° `O 7 50 O • 2 9 • 10a�-zl v • a R2 8 • 50 g� 2S 0 9 TH 5.8345'W. h 0 ST. .RC LrYA"D Yr►.1j• 10-90-gt• REDONDO vqL L , TR 1AC,T • :a • I 417 tt .�a i'4i114"4 4r meow • • • • 2'4 * far • • •••••.-oz-ct • • • • '14417 4: .4 3.• • • • : 0 • „ •••••. •. • • • , • • „ *II • $i.C: ; • 'd • • • • 1/ • • • „, • •,46$4**10 :4 jr,„‘zytop,% \44,i14,: • , 41):4-';'-'4'r • • r • ,• .p.mgowsvietlivpir. • ..V..!? • ,- • - — -- 4•1:i kl...:-:::it:.4;.‘f**.$;,''14,;`' o'..‘1 •`-''... ':';',kt•-, ..:Y:14 '. . .411 - .4•••• -,•• ^`,3-J- ,(1,010, • •.„'••,,,It.,'....?• ' •1*.i.,', <,r .)- ' .. 0 1 1... i- -n !'• • '' •,...4.4,-,,,,.‘, ...I r(tr„, • .. .., •, 4,,,,, , .• I.. — , ....E. •‘443 , - • - _ , _ .c.4,,,,,., -r.,,,6,1„....,,..,.! • . T#' — - •• ; ,: • \IN i • ' \444,•-ill,11-,e.t...:';,,,'44, , • ...... L. aLa.,:._3 0 --, ;. AL 141. • • ••••• , • 30 North Raymond Avenue Suite 708 Pasadena, Calif. 91103-3930 James P. Lough Attorney at Law March 21, 1988 MEMORANDUM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 12, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney RE: Change in Lot Merger Procedures Recommended Action: To introduce the attached ordinance to amend lot merger procedures. Telephone (818) 792-4728 (818) 792-4776 The purpose of the attached ordinance is to amend and clarify lot merger procedures. Among the issues addressed in the ordinance are recording procedures, appeal procedures and planning commission discretion. The ordinance, if adopted, would take away discretion from the planning commission and city council to unmerge lots that meet all the standards for merger. If this ordinance is finally adopted, neither the city council nor the planning commission would have the right to unmerge lots which meet all the requirements of merger. There would be a man- datory duty to merge if the standards were found in each case. Under the appeal procedures, this ordinance clarifies the type of appeal, the type of hearing and the timing of said appeal hearing. The ordinance specifically states that there would be no appeal fee charged for any appeal. These amendments to the appeal procedures do not change the current law but clarify it in a manner consistent with previous council intentions as expressed at recent council meetings. This ordinance also clarifies certain procedures as to when notices should be sent to the county recorder and property owners by the director of planning. With these clarifications, it will be somewhat easier for the planning department to deter- mine when it must file notices which are of extreme importa e to each property owner involve NOTED: Respectfullj sib tt IEVIN B. NORTHCRAFT, City Manager 23/SR0412A AMES P. LOUG , City A orney CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 29.5-19, 29.5-21, 29.5-25, 29.5-26, AND 29.5-28 TO ESTABLISH AND CLARIFY PROCEDURES REGARDING THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW, APPEAL PROCESSES AND DATES WHEN NOTICES MUST BE EFFECTUATED UNDER LOT MERGER PROCEDURES. WHEREAS, the city council has determined that, in order to reduce density and improve the quality of life within the boundaries of the City of Hermosa Beach, a lot merger procedure should be implemented; WHEREAS, the city council adopted a lot merger procedure consistent with the provisions of the state government code on August 26, 1986; WHEREAS, the city council has determined that it needs to establish more uniformity in decision making so that the standards apply equally to all citizens and property owners within the boundaries of the City of Hermosa Beach; WHEREAS, the city council desires to clarify its previous intention regarding appeal notices and procedures, including the timing of notices of determination to be sent to affected property owners; WHEREAS, the city council wishes to clarify that no appeal fees need to be paid by any person challenging a decision of the planning commission regarding the merger or nonmerger of parcels; and /// 23/ORD21 -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (b) The notice of merger for any parcel merged by the planning commission or city council shall be filed no later than thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the final hearing on determination of status. (c) A merger of parcels becomes effective on the date the notice of merger is duly filed with the county recorder's office. (Ord. No. 86-851, Sec.l, 8-26-86) Section 4. Section 29.5-26 (When parcels are not merged; release and clearance of notice of intention to determine status) shall be amended to read as follows: If the planning commission or city council determines that the affected parcels are not to be merged, the director of planning shall: (a) File for record with the county recorder's office a release of the notice of intention to determine status, recorded pursuant to section 29.5-23 of this article, specifying the names of the record owners and particularly describing the real property to be merged; and (b) Mail a clearance letter to the then current owner of record; (c) The release and clearance letter shall be filed and mailed, respec- tively, within five (5) working days of the date of the city council's determination or within five (5) working days after the appli- cable 10 -day appeal period has run following a determination of the planning commission. (Ord. No. 86-851, Sec.]., 8-26-86) Section 5. Section 29.5-28 (Appeal) shall be amended to read as follows: /// /// /// 23/ORD21 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, it has been determined that lot merger procedures do not have a significant detrimental impact upon the environ- ment of the City of Hermosa Beach but shall improve said environment and, therefore, a negative declaration is hereby approved. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 29.5-19 (Intent and purpose) is hereby amended to add the following language: Any procedure found within this article which is inconsistent or not authorized under the California Government Code shall not be followed. If any such procedures conflict with or are not authorized by the Government Code, the rules and procedures established under the Government Code shall be followed when implementing this article. Section 2. Section 29.5-21 (Requirements for merger) is hereby amended with the deletion of subsection (d ;-a1 the addition of a new subsection (d) as follows: (d) If the merger of parcel resu s in the creation of a parcel tha at least eight thousand (8,000) s. --re feet in size, the planning commiss - and/or city council may, with the ent of the property owner, redivie- e parcel into separate parcels.that a - at least four thousand (4,000) square feet n size. Section 3. Section 29.5-25 (Merger; notice, effective date) is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) If the planning commission or city council determines that the affected parcels are merged, the director of planning shall file for record with the county recorder's office a notice of merger specifying the names of the record owners and particularly describing the real property to be merged. 23/ORD21 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (a) The property owners, a member of the city council or any interested person may appeal a decision of the planning commission within ten (10) days of such decision, file an appeal with the city clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach. The city council shall con- sider the appeal within thirty (30) days. This appeal shall be a hearing held at no cost to the appellant with notice being given pur- suant to section 29.5-24 and with additional notice to be given to the property owner. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the city council shall declare its findings at a time not later than the next regularly scheduled city council meeting after the hearing is held. The city council may sustain, modify, or reject or overrule any recommendations or rulings of the planning commission and may make such findings as are consistent with the provisions of this chapter or the state Subdivision Map Act. (b) All decisions of the planning commis- sion regarding the merger or nonmerger of parcels shall be final, unless appealed from as prescribed in this section, or until any condition precedent to its effectiveness has been fulfilled, whichever is later in time. After final resolution of an appeal by the city council, the director of planning shall file all appropriate notices within the time limits established under Sections 29.5-25 and 29.5-26. Section 6. Effective date. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 7. Publication. The city council does hereby desig- nate the city attorney to prepare a summary of this ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c)(1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. Prior to the expira- tion of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the city clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. 23/ORD21 -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 �5 1•' 17 18� 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 8. The city clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the city council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF APRIL, 1988. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTORNE? 23/ORD21 -5- PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA § 29.5-19 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE — § 29.5-19 (b) The dimensions, area, legal description and boundaries of each proposed parcel. (c) The names, addresses and telephone numbers of the property owners, the subdivider, the registered civil engineer, or licensed surveyor who prepared the map. (d) The abutting streets and alleys and existing surface improvements and proposed dedications and improvements, if any. (e) The location of other existing easements. (f) Any and all improvements existing on the property in relation to the property lines and the proposed division. (g) Applicant shall agree to provide any necessary easements for the proposed parcel or parcels. (h) If necessary, the board of zoning adjustment shall establish the front of the lots and front setbacks. 6) Such other information as the board determines is necessary for the board of zoning adjustment to consider properly the proposed division, including topographic data in hillside areas. (j) Location of existing buildings and all trees with a diameter in excess of six (6) inches, and other improvements on the property to be divided. (k) Method of surface water disposal. (1) , Location and depth of fill areas. (2) Hearings for lot splits shall be held by the board of zoning adjustment and shall be processed in the same manner as for tentative subdivision maps. (Ord. No. N.S. 485, § 1, 4-16-74) ARTICLE IV. MERGER OF PARCELS* Sec. 29.5-19. Intent and purpose. The purpose of this section and the following sections relating to merger of parcels is to provide a procedure by which two (2) or *Editor's note—Ord. No. 86-851, § 1, adopted Aug. 26, 1986, enacted provi- sions designated as Art. Iv, H 29.5.19-29.5-28, as herein set out. State law reference—City control of subdivision, Ca. Gov. Code, § 66410 et seq. Supp. No. 9-86 342.48 § 29.5.20 SUBDIVISION OF LAND § 29.5-21 more contiguous parcels or units of land held by the same owner may be merged. This procedure is adopted pursuant to Sections 66451.10 through 66451.21, inclusive, of the California Govern- ment Code, and this Code. (Ord. No. 86-851, § 1, 8-26-86) Sec. 29.5-20. Applicability. (a) The provisions set forth in this article for the merger of parcels shall be applicable to two (2) or more contiguous parcels of land held by the same owner where: (1) The parcels were created under the provisions of this Code regulating subdivisions (Chapter 29.5 et seq.) or any prior state law or ordinance regulating the division of land or which were not subject to any prior law regulating the division of land; (2) At least one (1) of the contiguous parcels or units of land held by the same owner does not conform to standards for minimum parcel size to permit use or development under the city's zoning and/or subdivision ordinance. (b) Nothing in the provisions relating to merger of parcels shall be construed or interpreted to prohibit the sale, lease or financing of such contiguous parcels of land, or any of them, where the same have not been merged pursuant to the procedure set forth in this article. (Ord. No. 86-851, § 1, 8-26-86) Sec. 29.5-21. Requirements for merger. Any two (2) or more contiguous parcels or units of land held by the same owner which are subject to the merger provisions set forth as provided in section 29.5-20 of this article may be merged if all of the following requirements are satisfied: (a) The main structure is partiallysited on the contiguous parcel and not more than eighty (80) per cent of the lots on the same block of the affected parcel have been split and developed separately. (b) With respect to any affected parcel, one (1) or more of the following conditions exists: Supp. No. 9-86 342.49 $ 29.5-22 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE § 29.5-23 (1) Comprises less than four thousand (4,000) square feet in area at the time of the determination of merger; (2) Was not created in compliance with applicable laws and ordinances in effect at the time of its creation; (3) Does not meet current standards for sewage disposal and domestic water supply; (4) Does not meet slope stability standards; (5) Has no legal access which is adequate for vehicular and safety equipment access and maneuverability; (6) Its development would create health or safety hazards; (7) Is inconsistent with the applicable general plan and any applicable specific plan, other than minimum lot size or density standards. (c) The requirements set forth in subsection (b) of this section shall not be applicable if any of the conditions set forth in Section 66451.11 (bXA) through (E) of the California Gov- ernment Code exist. (d) The planning commission and/or the city council may make a determination of nonmerger whether or not the affected property meets the standards for merger. (Ord. No. 86-851, § 1, 8-26-86) Sec. 29.5-22. Determination of ownership. For purposes of determining whether contiguous parcels or units are held by the same owner, ownership shall be determined as of the date that notice of intention to determine status is recorded pursuant to section 29.5-23 ofthis chapter. (Ord. No. 86-851, § 1, 8-26-86) Sec. 29.5-23. Notice of intention to determine status. Whenever the director of planning has knowledge that real property may be merged pursuant to the merger provisions of this article, he shall: (a) Mail by certified mail to the then current record owner of the property a notice of intention to determine status. Such notice shall state that: Supp. No. 9$6 342.50 1 § 29.5-24 SUBDIVISION OF LAND § 29.5-24 (1) The affected parcels may be merged pursuant to the merger provisions of sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28, inclusive of this article; (2) The owner may file a request with the planning de- partment any time within thirty (30) days after the date the notice of intention to determine status is recorded for a hearing before the planning commission and may present evidence at the hearing that the property does not meet the requirements for merger; and (3) That the notice of intention to determine status was filed for recording with the county recorder's office on the same date such notice was mailed to the property owner; and (b) File for record with the county recorder's office, on the same date that the notice is mailed to the property owner, the notice of intention to determine status. (Ord. No. 86-851, § 1, 8-26-86) Sec. 29.5-24. Hearing date, fee, presentation of evidence, planning commission determination. (a) Upon receipt of a request for a hearing on determination of status and receipt of the filing fee as set forth by resolution of the city council, the director of planning shall fix a time, date and place for a hearing to be conducted by the planning commission and shall so notify the property owner by certified mail. The hearing shall be conducted not less than thirty (30) days follow- ing the receipt of the property owner's request therefor, but may be postponed or continued with the mutual consent of the plan- ning commission and the property owner. (b) At the hearing, the property owner shall be given the op- portunity to present any evidence that the affected property does not meet the requirements for merger as set forth in sections 29.5-20 and 29.5-21 of this article. (c) At the conclusion of the hearing, the planning commission shall make a determination as to whether the affected parcels are to be merged and shall notify the owner of its determination as soon thereafter as practicable, but no later than five (5) working Supp. No. 9-86 342.51 § 29.5-25 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE f 29.5-26 days after the determination has been reached. If such notifica- . tion cannot be made at the time of the hearing to the owner in person, the notification shall be made by certified mail. (Ord. No. 86-851, § 1, 8-26-86) Sec. 29.5-25. Merger; notice, effective date. (a) If the planning commission determines that the affected parcels are merged, the director of planning shall file for record with the county recorder's office a notice of merger specifying the names of the record owners and particularly describing the real property to be merged. (b) The notice of merger shall be filed no later than thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the hearing on determination of status, unless a timely appeal from the commission's determina- tion is filed pursuant to section 29.5-28 of this article. (c) A merger of parcels becomes effective on the date the notice of merger is duly filed with the county recorder's.office. (Ord. No. 86-851, § 1, 8-26-86) Sec. 29.5-26. When parcels not merged; release and clear- ance of notice of intention to determine status. If the planning commission determines that the affected par- cels are not to be merged, the director of planning shall: (a) File for record with the county recorder's office a release of the notice of intention to determine status, recorded pur- suant to section 29.5-23 of this article, specifying the names of the record owners and particularly describing the real property to be merged; and (b) Mail a clearance letter to the then current owner of record; (c) The release and clearance letter shall be filed and mailed, respectively, within five (5) working days of the date of the planning commission's determination. (Ord. No. 86-851, § 1, 8-26-86) Supp. No. 9-86 342.52 1 § 29.5-27 SUBDIVISION OF LAND $ 29.5.28 Sec. 29.5-27. Planning commission determination without hearing; notice to owner. If the property owner fails to file a request for hearing within the thirty -day period as provided in section 29.5-24 of this article, the planning commission may, at any time thereafter, make a determination as to whether the affected parcels are to be merged. (a) If the planning commission makes a determination of merg- er, the director of planning shall file a notice of merger no later than ninety (90) days after the mailing of the notice of opportunity for hearing as provided in section 29.5-27 of this article, and shall notify the property owner of such determination by certified mail. (b) If the planning commission makes a determination of nonmerger, the director of planning shall follow the proce- dure set forth in section 29.5-26 of this article. (Ord. No. 86-851, § 1; 8-26-86) • Sec. 29.5-28. Appeal. (a) The property owners, a member of the city council or any interested person adversely affected by a decision of the planning commission with respect to the merger, may within ten (10) days of such decision, file an appeal with the city clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach. The city council shall consider the appeal within thirty (30) days. This appeal shall be a public hearing with notice being given pursuant to section 29.5-24 and with additional no- tice to be given to the property owner. Upon conclusion of the public hearing, the city council shall within ten (10) days declare its findings. The city council may sustain, modify, reject or over- rule any recommendations or rulings of the planning commission and may make such findings as are consistent with the provi- sions of this chapter or the state Subdivision Map Act. (b) All decisions of the planning commission regarding the merger or nonmerger of parcels shall be final, unless appealed from as prescribed in this section, or until any condition precedent to its effectiveness has been fulfilled, whichever is later in time. (c) If the city council affirms the decision of the planning com- mission or the action of the commission becomes final, the direc- Supp. No. 4.87 342.53 • § 29.5-29 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE § 29.5.31 tor of planning shall within thirty (30) days of the decision of the city council, file for record a notice of merger with the county recorder's office, and mail a copy of such notice to the property owner. (d) If the city council reverses the decision of the planning commission, the director of planning shall, within thirty (30) days of the decision of the city council, file for record a release of the notice of intention to determine status with the county re- corder's office, and mail a copy of such release to the property owner. (Ord. No. 86-851, § 1, 8-26-86) Sec. 29.5-29. Industry merger. Two or more contiguous parcels, under common ownership, may be voluntarily merged without reverting to the procedures of this chapter. Such merger requires that the recordation of an instrument evidencing the merger be made with the county re- corder. (Ord. No. 87-876, § 1, 4-14-87) Sec. 29.5-30. Reserved. Sec. 29.5-31. Development involving contiguous parcels. It shall be prohibited to separately sell or separate two (2) or more contiguous lots owned by the same person or legal entity that have an existing structure or improvements straddling their common property line. For property not owned by the same per- son or legal entity which has been conveyed in violation of this section, no permits for the demolition, construction or addition to the structure shall be issued by the Hermosa Beach Building Department. (Ord. No. 87-875, § 1, 4-14-87) Supp. No. 4-87 342.54 I 1 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council April 4, 1988 City Council Meeting April 12, 1988 REPORT ON REQUEST OF MICHAEL LAWTON FOR EXEMPTION FROM STANDARDS FOR A PROJECT LOCATED AT 1840 HERMOSA AVENUE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council direct staff to: 1) Refund plan check fees for the three unit project or apply those fees to a revised project that conforms with the general plan. 2) Expedite the plan review of any revised project. 3) Allow the applicant additional time to revise the project to conform to the general plan while retaining the R-3 development standards already "grandfathered" pursuant to Ordinance No. 88-917. This may need to be accomplished by amending the referenced ordinance with respect to the time limit. BACKGROUND At the March 22, 1988 City Council meeting, Michael Lawton ad- dressed the council and submitted a letter requesting approval for a three dwelling unit project (condominium or apartment). The "City Council directed that this matter be returned for this meeting. ANALYSIS The Lawton's project is located in an area with a general plan designation of medium density which was zoned R-3 at the time the project was submitted. According to information recently received from the applicant's surveyor, the area of the lot is 5040.753 sq. ft.. The architect had originally indicated the lot area as 5162.5 sq. ft.. Ordinance No. 87-873 (extended by Ordinance No. 87-881) was adop- ted on February 24, 1987 as an interim ordinance and precluded issuance of building permits for projects which did not meet the density requirements of both the general plan and zoning clas- sification for the parcel involved. The property could therefor only be developed in accordance with the more restrictive medium density classification. The Lawton's architect submitted a three unit project in error, which was compounded by the failure of the Building Department to recognize during initial review of the project, that the lot area was deficient for three units (5227.2 sq. ft. needed) pursuant to the general plan. The error was exacerbated by remaining unde- tected until after working drawings had been submitted for plan - 1- 1 check and that process started. No building permits have been issued for the project. Mr. Lawton is requesting that he be allowed to pursue either a three unit apartment project or a three unit condominium project, utilizing R-3 development standards, and that he be allowed addi- tional time to complete the processes necessary to obtain a building permit. His property has been rezoned to R-2 since his original submittal; however, Ordinance No. 88-917, which rezoned his property, exempted projects which were submitted prior to February 23, 1988 from complying with R-2 development standards (other than density) provided a permit was obtained within six months of the effective date of the ordinance. Mr. Lawton's requests will be addressed individually for clarity: 1) Three unit condominium - Condominiums must comply with the general plan. A three unit project would result in a density of 25.92 d.u./acre which exceeds the 25 d.u./acre allowed. Rounding off is not permitted. 2) Three unit apartment - As R-3 zoned property, three apartment units would be allowed (1320 sq. ft. X 3 units = 3960 sq. ft. of lot area ); however, Ordinance No. 87-873 requires all projects to comply with the most restrictive density allowed by zoning or the general plan. As indicated in the condominium analysis, a three unit project exceeds the allowable general plan density. It would be necessary to rescind Interim Or- dinance No. 87-881 in order for a three apartment unit project to be permitted on the applicant's property. The processing error seems an inadequate reason to allow higher density than others would be permitted. 3) Plan Check fee refund - A plan check fee refund would appear appropriate in light of the error, if the applicant does not pursue a project. If a revised project is submitted, plan check fees already paid should be applied to that project. 4) Additional time - The applicant's project was "grandfathered" regarding R-3 development standards pursuant to Ordinance No. 88-917 provided a permit is obtained by September 8, 1988 (six months from adoption). Additional time to prepare revised plans may be necessary, would seem appropriate and could be accomplished by amending Ordinance No. 88-917 with regards to the time limit. Only one other project would receive the benefit of the time extension. The error committed by the Building Department did not affect the ability of the applicant to construct three dwelling units as that issue had been decided by the City Council when Ordinance No. 87-881 was adopted. It could be certainly be argued that the error did lead the applicant to expend funds for working drawings for a project which is unbuildable without significant modifica- tions; therefor, staff is recommending concessions regarding plan check fees, expediting revised plans and allowing additional time to obtain a permit. ALTERNATIVES 2 1) Allow the applicant to pursue a two unit condominium project while retaining the R-3 development standards allowed for projects submitted prior to the introduction of Ordinance No. 88-917. The Council would be interpreting the condominium pro- posal as a revision to the previously submitted project and thus "grandfathered" regarding development standards. This alternative would require processing through the Planning Commission for the tentative tract map and conditional use permit and would also require additional time allowances to obtain a permit. 2) Take no action. The applicant could revise his project to a duplex development while retaining the R-3 development stan- dards grandfathered by Ordinance No. 88-917. Concur: Respectfully submitted, (oLWilam Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety Kev City Manager cra t CITY MANAGER COMMENTS An ordinance amendment would be required to amend the time limit. Since an amendment would only be needed if a building permit is not issued by September 8, 1988, one may not be necessary. Regarding the Building Department's delay in determining the lot area deficiency, the Department has counseled it's employees and revised the plan review forms to avoid recurrences of this problem. t • :s:.-. •• • •••.1:•;. MICHAEL. P. LAWPON 1840 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90234 of -41/1444#44 Woroh, >3>c .#7 doPi4-04416ta-SAfok) 844:114"'i 9az51 it4444b4i;d°4eist, ,14t4 eGst .• •°7,1ees,./tiPeAz Azi4 (70/1Aseilivi Z ,o;2 ���4- – Ad/14k) ;A/44 efte.t. gp.estie4e .tf-sue. ‘4,14t /tectotzete-, ,74t Aso, - .A;gc tet' A o -." -44.141 • _ au' l4 � aisof/ J 1 mc— i/ , ' Row- icA1-4e4--440t` /A&-d10r's'*.t 44014r4 .rte ssic .Cel lat444i Aye At'crositf e;irl*.4; . �.l44isc '/404X, 71jteC a 4.0.4� utot � �T�"' iee ;und, , foe ,.ef A8¢O /e,ac. ata. �'y� .fes Aesosetta• "'Ai. .moi `r.�'uluN"J .tivoi0e, .tcG .c�r.� a.t.p'.wG .�i.wC deaueAsace tri .2.40take, f� �'u"•y 110t4 s2z491-41E els-adz a.;ezLuaaz,,e.t. di4t4-c Covra Azr• Irgozowe : kait4e<w) ../ L'2 -; . . • J. 1114 hoe deopeerfr Atr #4.9se-04, s.dr A4.0-- 1/4:,- Ii,d4i,, 444tod.4 4yt j 444s7 elm01444Z, 101641 42474i*146444‘44*. Aregay 040,0e .t404(41,- aZ-mss., ArKwNil44111/4 .,GoG,a ileteh'e A‘li• I • e. -40W-4447WAred.' v/�rr0~17 late6os� �'tiutir 01* csot aatjon ‘440/ -al Air 4exee'/tl��- �c.wd .�s�vr ,uets�w� .t .we ee k .4r.441;0040 p: 40;4 4.d/44r 4140z4 egtdiyJtH.oraYcv4teg, A64' l .3d/X*uicG //is -Z1444 Aylta-Wee, 44,0e" .€402AdAr-4te r Aer 7er4a4 .ski it' -3 _ o au.d.sowce wzopliie zeitzu. '45 70.e W-0t.04afie#1;w4044 #11. c:41 ' /4#1c44, Aoe /It t Ite4•;4 4.4^1 afg•t_ st $0240gat4 aeurel°°roel foo• -.cKc;t` 1X� ,� , % rj exc 44.:#W4s4- a 14:54;Gt eye fix f y • • MICHAEL P. LAW TON 1840 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 eearc4r~fv, .at .cct ,Glea??Owtf et- .c der4A6 ef'7i4411044su«r. da.-4414P4Xu44ej INu% iL�'�!i_QtL_ :Q,is�LO�r ctHtl�t.�sfr� 01 lite�lK.e2.�sccr�w 17d444.444,-4 4,vM°4"--41:444€: ,1040fre41--derie oUze •l4A4Zato&O€ //14,--see.Mad4 frt'u`�°�' A!t ,uriYc /Ate 4.04‘4few'�'3� Blti ` • 4 ,61�. 4G+c acs .sa.. 0144 Atifreta, Ac44:(16024401.e., .lstroa•C, 40(.4044.4m .444414 /Adele- 444 AZ, Ad- A- alliti,Sei Aol< 44: otOrt.1 444:4,ildertiegoielast titat• Alee.c . 4.%w /1k4; #140 .t ik„7504.4 4t4.-"regOt 444,10#61p, 4444444,001. dteeassear of Q 4.4.64 Ate nr4s Uele 904, 4°714 zeoely+) /#404 .17#14. 6`11"e't 'lice 4, ;t4Z44`4•6 .i.;34&‘/21/44/ Affeleed-.4fre Ateetoved eoc. ele A.44.1 144t;/ 4/044tegtsve,e, begodelv444;/” 4* -ted �. .;04,04.4;g4 Qom. .�- BACKGROUND MATERIALS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 saiq ORDINANCE NO. 87- 881 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO EXTEND ORDINANCE NO. 87-873 THAT PROHIBITS THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENTS THAT DO NOT MEET THE STANDARDS OF BOTH THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARTICULAR PROPERTY TO BE DEVELOPED OR IMPROVED. WHEREAS, consistency between the Hermosa Beach Planning and the Hermosa Beach Zoning Codes are both required by state law and a goal of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach; WHEREAS, development of parcels in a manner inconsitent with either the General Plan or Zoning creates inconsistencies which cannot be remedied during the lifetimes of the buildings in question; WHEREAS, such inconsistent development is a detriment to the City of Hermosa Beach in that it prevents proper planning to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public of the City of Hermosa Beach; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach are currently taking steps to bring our planning and zoning into consistency through hearings for both bodies; WHEREAS, allowing inconsistent development during the process of bringing all parcels into consistency will be a long term harm to the City's planning process and a detriment to the health, safety and general welfare of the populous; /// L2/buildper -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 87-873 was adopted by the City Council of Hermosa Beach on February 10, 1987, whereupon it prohibited the issuance of Building Permits for developments that do not meet the standards of both the General Plan Designation and Zoning classification for a period of forty-five (45) days; WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 (b) provides for an urgency measure extension of twenty-two (22) months, fifteen (15) days upon adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote following notice pursuant to Section 65090 and a public hearing; WHEREAS, Government Code Section 36937 allows this extending ordinance to take immediate effect for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, and upon a vote of four-fifths (4/5) of the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 87-873 be extended an additional twenty-two (22) months, fifteen days, pursuant to Government Code 65858 (b). Section 2. That the Planning Commission continue to review and revise Zoning Classifications and General Plan Designations for consistency. Section 3. That pursuant to Government Code Section 36937, this ordinance is designed to protect the health and safety of the citizens of Hermosa Beach and becomes effective immediately upon adoption of a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council. /1/ /1/ L2/buildper -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 15 16 177 18_ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 1987. ATTEST: G C TY CLERK Ozedazz APPROVED AS TO FORM: _ 4,11.,%.:le %;_ C°TY ATTORNEY PRESIDENT OF T :CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF �� CITY OF HERMOSA BEA CALIFORNIA L2/buildper -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88- 917 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on February 23, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. The State law requires consistency between the zoning and the General Plan; B. Rezoning the subject properties as indicated on the attached Maps 2 through 3E will result in consistency between the zoning and General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain amending the Zoning Map for various areas as shown on the attached maps and described as follows: 1. Area 1, (Map 1) Rezone from R-3 Zone to R-2 Zone, legally Nscibed as Lots 1-15 inclusive & 18-24 inclusive, Block 10, First Addition to Hermosa Beach; Lots 1-15 inclusive & 18-22 inclusive, Block 9, First Addition to Hermosa Beach; Lot 1, Parcel Map #10098; 2. Area 1A, (Map 2) Rezone from R-3 Zone to R-2 Zone, legally described as Lots 1-5 inclusive, Tract #2649; Lots 1-8 inclusive, Hiss Addition to Hermosa Beach; 3. Area 1B, (Map 3 - 3E) Rezone from R-3 Zone to R-2 Zone: (Map 3A): This area is legally described as: - Lots 16-36 inclusive, northerly 10' of Lot 37 & Lot 39, Tract #1132; - Lots 1-15 inclusive & 30, Block 32, First Addition to Hermosa Beach; - Lot 1, Parcel Map #12381; (Map 3B): This area is legally described as: - Lots 1-16 inclusive, Block 61, First Addition to Hermosa Beach; ▪ Lots 1-5 inclusive, Block 31, First Addition to Hermosa Beach; (Map 3C): This area is legally described as: - Lots 1-3 inclusive & 6-11 inclusive, Block 30, First Addition to Hermosa Beach; - Lot 1, Parcel Map #14210; - Lots 1-11 inclusive, First Addition to Hermosa Beach; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25. 26 27 28 - Lots 1-7 inclusive, Block 28, First Addition to• Hermosa Beach; (Map 3D).: This area is legally described as: - Lots 14-18 inclusive, Block 22, First Addition to Hermosa Beach; (Map 3E): Tbis area is legally described as: - Lots 8-13 inclusive, Block 23, First Addition to Hermosa Beach; - Lots 8-14 inclusive, Block 24, First Addition to Hermosa Beach. 4. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the city prior to February 23, 1988. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plans (plot plan, floor plans, elevation plans and other similar plans) and a lot survey. Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must be issued a bilding permit within six months of the effective date of this ordinance. 5. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof .in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this $ t day of / Ar -4j_, 1988. ENT of t - C ty C uncil and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, Ca ifornia. 41%.11Y 111 1LGLYl1.1.l�. tlilvW 'Location a. Address: Areas 1, lA & 18 Cee attached man) b. Legal: various 2. Description Zone chanaQ from R-1 to R-2 for Argas 1. 1A 1R 3. Sponsor a. Name: Planning Dept. b. Mailing Address: r - 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone: 213-376-6984 NEGATIVE DECLARATION • In accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City of Hermosa beach, which im plements the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it be- comes final, no comprehensive Enviromnental Impact Report is required for this project. FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.COMMITTEE _We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro .posed project in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas- ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the -environment. Documentation sup$prtin• t 's finding is on file in the Building Department. 1-7-1988 Date of Finding FINDING OF THE P.LANNINCOMMISSION We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro- ject in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environ- mental Impact Report because,. provid - the attached mitigation measures are included in the project, it would o - e a significant effect on the en- vironment. Documentation suppo- i is ding is on file in the Build- ing Department. / + - 1-19-1988 Date of Finding air an, Planning Commission IND,ING 'F THE CITY COUNCIL We have undertaken and completed an environmental Impact Review of this pro- posed project in accordance with Resolution 70-4309 of the City Council of • Hermosa Beach, and find this project does not require a comprehensive En- vironmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas- ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation suppo . • this nding is on file in the Building Department. .504-8/ .Date of Finding F9or, Hermosa each Cit Council ••••••• 1//m•••••••••••=••• iCIAL* GENERAL PLAN MAP AS AMENDED Z.M 0 S E A.;C C A IL EFOI1 IE -eimred by the Planning Department • • • • • :,,••••• t) Ha • ro: s.;•;;;:?f,; R-3 f 007.Fal •.:!: R-3 f!'.R:1 —'. R-2. •••C.,11 ' • 4 )011-4,,;.... R.1 1.o. Th: • :A ' • • • ., -0* pi- . d 4..0 /0„..••••—....,•12. 0 , ,e'-‘. - :a t .4.--..--...--2-•":"--1--- '15.1 Ot.• Z. %...-----j ir ....»._ % \CC •••• .>.....MD ,_....2...,:.....% , ---7 i •ir..7: ••-GC _,..... ...,.-,......,,,1: ix ac •40 ..:.• ...... 0c i • . ..... ma 4 ' ......„ . __I:L.1c • t,..,.. r — •*0 i 1.0 1.------- t 47-0--•-.. • e''...-.7 • ..------.._ :1;e.\ • *-. ...4 • .1. :. :4 10 a • ! j_ ,... ... At . i a e -•, : • I....1 1 1' ., 4... 4..... , 7 -re..• , 0 • r--.--7 ,-- i'43.44) 4IM5 iNC I if '...F.1• Ma--. ....." I os. A.:• • ••••. . • .1777'. I Cern April 5, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council April 12, 1988 UTILITY USER TAX REPORT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND Several members of the City Council have requested a report on the allocation of UUT funds since the inception of this tax in fiscal year 85/86. All allocations included in this report were approved by the then seated City Councils. ANALYSIS The attached chart reflects UUT monies collected and expended for the last three years beginning with fiscal year 85/86 and continuing through this present fiscal year 87/88. Please keep in mind the figures for fiscal year 87/88 are projections only as we are presently in the middle of that year. NOTE: This report deals only with Utility User Tax monies and does not include any other revenue that is designated for the Sewer Fund. Further, this does not include the additional 4% UUT as that money has already been seperately designated by the present City Council. UUT MONIES IN SEWER FUND The total amount of UUT monies deposited into the Sewer Fund beginning with fiscal year 85/86 and ending June 30, 1988, is expected to be $1,904,005. The City expects to spend that full amount plus $45,491 from other Sewer Fund revenue sources. Those sources of revenue are Beach Outlet Maintenance, Sewer Connection Fee, Sewer Demolition Fee, Sewer Lateral Installation and in Lieu Sewer Fee. Of that total ($1,949,496), $1,481,307 is to be expended on design, construction and inspection. These figures suggest $468,189 was expended from the Sewer Fund on sewer related items other than design, construction and inspection. A UUT MONIES: GENERAL FUND Year I, 1985/86: Records indicate that $100,000 was allocated for Police Foot Patrol and $36,000 was allocated for Bootleg Abatement. Year II, 1986/87: Records indicate that $312,510 was allocated to police for Foot Patrol and other police related items; and $50,000 was allocated for Bootleg Enforcement. Year III, 1987/88: The only written recordation is a transfer of $800,000 from the General Fund into the Sewer Fund thus leaving a balance of $284,320 UUT monies in the General Fund for this present fiscal year. There is no other specific action of the then City Council regarding the UUT monies in the General Fund for this year. If City Council wishes to change the UUT allocation, staff suggests this be conveyed to the City Manager for his inclusion in the City Manager's recommended 88/89 budget. Respectfully submitted, Alana M. Mastrian Assistant City Manager Concur: Kevin Northcraft City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator UUT COLLECTED INTO GEN FUND UUT TRANSFERRED INTO SEWER FUND AMT EXPENDED FROM SEWER FUND BAL IN SEWER FUND OF UUT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR GENERAL FUND EXP OF UUT MONIES 1ST YR 85/86 $618,800 2ND YR $1,084,910 86/87 3RD YR $1,084,320 87/88 $440,000 $664,005 $800,000 $184,522 $180,961 $1,584,013 $255,478 $483,044 $-784,013 $178,800 $420,905 $284,320 TOTALS: $2,788,030 $1,904,005 $1,949,496 $-45,491 $884,025 I• Further Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 85-804. Motion Debellis, second Cioffi AYES - Brutsch, Cioffi, DeBellis NOES*- Wood, Mayor Barks Final Action: Funds to be raised by the Utility Users Tax to be earmarked as follows: 1. The first $500,000 to pay the debt -service or the sewer maintenance bond. 2. To fund the Police foot patrol year-round in the downtown area (approximately $100,000). 3. To aggressively enforce bootleg removal •(approximately $36,000). Motion DeBellis, second Brutsch AYES - Brutsch, Cioffi, DeBellis, Wood, Mayor Barks NOES - None b. Any further modifications from City Council: 1) Increase City Council Department Conference allocation to $8,459. Memorandum from City Manager Gregory T. Meyer dated June 4, 1985. Action - To increase the recommended allocation for City Council Department Conference expenses by $1,499 thereby restoring this account to the same level as in 1984-85. Motion Mayor Barks, second Cioffi. So ordered noting "NO" votes by Brutsch and Wood. 2) Other a. Ordinance No. 85-801 (from 2d) - Apartment Rental Business Licenses Action - To rescind Ordinance No. 85-801. Motion DeBellis, second Brutsch. So ordered. b. Ordinance No. 85-802 (from 2c) - City Sewer System Fee Acton - To rescind Ordinance No. 85-802. 14otion DeBellis, second Brutsch. So ordered. A recess was called at 9:45 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:00 P.M. - 7 t� A -<•A• 6 -l3-86 Honorable Mayor and members of the Hermosa Beach City Council -May 6, 1986 City Council Meeting of May 13, 1986 INTRODUCING ORDINANCE TO MAINTAIN UTILITY USERS TAX AT 6% RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and introduce the attached Ordinance thereby causing the Utility Users Tax to remain at its current 6% rate. BACKGROUND At the time that the U.U.T. was enacted, effective October, 1985 the UUT rate was set as follows: From implementation through June 30, 1986 at 6% Effective July 1, 1986 to be reduced by 1% to a rate of 5% UUT expires October 1, 1988 Additionally, as a part of instituting the UUT, the City Council established a policy that the monies received from this General Fund source would be allocated for the following priorities: 1. Sewer rehabilitation 2. Police, with a particular emphasis on Foot Patrol 3. Bootleg Enforcement ANALYSIS Implementation of the UUT has gone well and seems to have been generally "accepted" in the community. For the first budget year of the UUT monies will have been collected for only 9 months. The estimate of that income for this fiscal year was $ 576,000 to be allocated as follows: _ Sewer $ 440,000 Police $ 100,000 _Bootleg $ 36,000 Based on the several months of income it is expected that a rea- sonable assumption of UUT income for 1986 - '87 will be $154,585 -per one percent tax. The proposed 1986 - '87 budget assumes the following expenses: - 1 - r it .6.(3 11 (, Category Amount Components Sewer $ 565,000 Capital Improvements Bootleg $ 50,000 (Enforcement Inspector - (Prosecution & Code Police $ 312,510 2 Foot Patrol Officers at $ 100,000 plus other items amounting to $ 212,510 TOTAL $ 927,510 At a 5% UUT rate, approximately $ 772,925 will be raised next fiscal year; at 67 $ 927,510 will be raised. The proposed budget assumes the 6% rate. Reducing the UUT rate to 5% effective July 1, 1986 means that the City's General Fund proposed budget expen- ditures for Police and/or other departments will have to be re- duced by $ 154, 585 for 1986 - '87. As it now stands the UUT rate will automatically go down from 6% to 5%, effective July 1, 1986. For the rate to remain at 6% for the entire 1986 '87 fiscal year an Ordinance modification is necessary predicated on the following schedule: Introduction May 13, 1986 Adoption May 27, 1986 30 days thereafter June 27, 1986 Understandably the City Council would not want to make a commit- ment as to the final UUT rate determination until after having considered the proposed 1986 - '87 budget. That document is being given to you on May 13, Workshops are then scheduled for later in May, the Public Hearing on June 10 and consideration of Budget adoption is set for June 24. So, the only way to ensure the option of a 6% rate for the entire fiscal year is to set in motion such an Ordinance now. Doing so, however, does not bind the Council. Furtherconsideration can be given at the time of second reading of the Ordinance (May 27) and on June 10 as an urgency matter. - - 2 • In addition to the staff recommendation there Bre several other options available to the City Council: 1. Allow the UUT to automatically reduce by 17 as of July first. For one month the financial impact is S12,882; to then consider the matter concurrent with Budget adoption actions on June 24 would mean an Ordinance effective date of August 9 (or a loss of 3 months at the higher rate i.e. a reduction in the City Manager's proposed budget expenditures of $ 38,646). 2. Hold the matter over until May 27th, thereby resulting at least a 2 months decline in UUT income (a budget reduction of $ 25,764). Reach a determination now that the rate is to be reduced ;/ to Sit and instruct the City Manager to modify his proposed budget accordingly (a General Fund reduction of $ 154,585). Greg G ry T. M-yer Cit Manager GTM/Id cc Attachment 4. Noted for Fiscal Impact:• i Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Honorable Mayor and members of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 16, 1987 City Council Meeting of March 24, 1987 INFORMATIONAL REPORT RE U.U.T. MONIES FOR SEWER, POLICE & CODE ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that: 1. This report be received and filed; 2. The City Manager be directed to return to the Council at their June 9 meeting, with a financing scenario to pay for sewer rehabilitation by borrowing monies to be paid back through UUT income. BACKGROUND At the City Council meeting of February 24, 1987 staff was requested to provide an historical recap on the usage of these monies during the fiscal year. ANALYSIS The adopted budget, consistent with the City Manager's recommended budget, allocated UUT, General Fund income to be spent as follows: SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $ 565,000 BOOTLEG/CODE ENFORCEMENT $ 50,000 POLICE ACTIVITIES $ 312,510 That fully allocated the estimated UUT income for the year. --.-_---=Subsequently, at the mid -year budget, it was estimated that an _ -. additional $ 99,005 in UUT income would be received. Those monies were therefore presumed and will be transferred to the Sewer Fund. This means that, at the end of this fiscal year, we 1. estimate that the Sewer Fund will have a Fund Balance of $ 166,486. - 1 - a a x.0 The S 362,510 budgeted for Bootleg/Code Enforcement and Police activities is, monthly, being expended as authorized. It is not anticipated that there will be any of these monies remaining at the end of the fiscal year. Attached is a recap on the precise expenditures for Sewer. It indicates that, of the $ $ 628,845 appropriated for Sewer Capital Improvements, $ 89,996 has been expended and $ 1,372 encumbered. In the opinion of the Public Works Director, all of the remaining CIP funds ( $ 537,477) will be spent or encumbered during this fiscal year. In looking to future Sewer CIP funding needs, the adopted multi-year CIP budget presumes that at least $ 591,415 will be needed for 1987 - '88. Preliminarily it looks like we will be able to -somewhat accelerate our "pay as you go" sewer replacement rate, if unit costs are not beyond what has been estimated. This will be taken into account as the 1988 budget is prepared. In the fall of 1987 we will have completed two full years of collecting the UUT. On that basis good projections could be made re this income source over multiple years. Likewise, it is possible that, once another sewer improvement project or two is completed, we could realistically appraise cost estimates vis-a-vis the Santina/Thompson Deficiency Study. This could then lead to a formal, intensive program of massive sewer replacement over a short period of time, accomplished by the borrowing of monies to fund the project. In order to do so an analysis of how best to finance this (e.g. some sort of bond/debt wherein the UUT monies are pledged) needs to be done. With the further .concurrence of Council staff will embark on this. Attachments GTM/ld cc Assistant City Manager Mastrian Public Works Director Antich • 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: GARY BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER RE: UTILITY USER TAX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DATE: JANUARY 28, 1988 This memo is in response to the request from a majority of the council regarding the financial management of Utility User Tax (U.U.T.) monies. The original founding thought behind the adoption of the U.U.T. was to fund new sewer construction only. however, after lengthy debate the council decided that the U.U.T. revenue should be earmarked for new aewer construction, police foot patrol, and bootleg abatement. The oounoil decided that the new funds should be used to pay for new sewer oonstruction because the results of the sewer survey disolosed that our present sewage disposal system was in poor condition. The council direoted the City Manager to investigate financial methods to pay for the upgrade of the system as soon as possible. The Hermosa Beach budget contains several fund oatagories. The U.U.T. revenue is placed in fund #001, known as the General Fund. There is a second fund dealing with sewer maintenance. This fund is fund #160 "the Sewer Fund". The council felt that the normal cost to administer and maintain existing sewer lines should be payed by this account. From the many memos on the financial management of U.U.T. monies I have recently reviewed, I strongly suggest the following 1) The council provide specific direction to the staff as to the proper administration of these funds. 2) Specific fund management guideliaes'must be established in advance of the collection of U.U.T. monies voters approved in november My office will be glad to assist the council in the promulgation of U.U.T. guidelines. AY U " H CITY TREA URER cc: Finance Administrator City Manager SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 8 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 30, 1988 City Council Meeting of April 12, 1988 CONSIDERATION OF DESIGN REVIEW P CESS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION Recommendation That the City Council direct study the appropriateness of struction within t e City. , Background • `� Planning a d -sign Commission and "staff to review process for At the budget preview council meeting of March 29, 1988, the City Council directed staff to place this item on the council agenda for further discussion. The City has previously had a design review process through a citizens' Design Review Board. This process generated many complaints, and was dissolved by Council action in August, 1982. Analysis Staff feels the creation of a design review process is an impor- tant vehicle for improving the quality of new construction in the City. Past experience in other cities indicates that the quality of architectural features are improved by an appropriate design review process. These improvements reflect on the new construc- tion in the neighborhood in which the buildings reside and in- crementally to the entire community. While cost factors certain- ly must be considered and limit massive changes in design, a design review process does encourage design features and land- scaping that maximize the positive impact of new development. Our experience with design review processes in other cities --both successful and unsuccessful ones --strongly suggest that a suc- cessful program include the following elements: (1) Professional input of an architect and landscape architect. Since plans professionally developed are being reviewed, professional expertise is required to critique and reach agreement on suggestions for changes. Initial design re- views done by lay citizen panels are not as successful. For this reason, the appropriate professionals should be on retainer with the City to meet on call or regularly, depending upon demand for design review of projects. To avoid conflicts, these professionals should agree not to do work in the City while they are on retainer to the City. (2) Appeals from initial design review should be to the Plan- ning Commission, who in many cases may already be reviewing projects for other necessary approvals. By adding this role to the Planning Commission rather than a separate �- (3) body, delays and redundant review by two lay bodies are avoided. Design guidelines should be developed to aid an architect in developing plans subject to design review by the City. This will avoid large departures from acceptable plans and again, help reduce the possibilities of delays in projects. (4) Design review should be a part of the review process for a large spectrum of new construction to have a maximum posi- tive impact on the community. Major additions to existing homes should be included for consideration of those proj- ects subject to design review. Additional costs incurred by the City should be recovered through appropriate permit fees for design review considerations. (5) The current estimate for consideration of this issue by staff is in the first quarter of the next fiscal year (July through Sep- tember, 1988.) Kevin ort craft City Manager KBN/ld 2 MID zE/14/11.2. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 5, 1988 City Council Meeting of April 12, 1988 PROPOSED POLICY FOR LENGTH OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS Recommendation: That the City Council consider approving the following policy regarding length of regular Council meetings: It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. Background: Where Councils have no set policy on the maximum time for their meetings, there is a potential for meetings to last until well into the morning. Meetings that last beyond 3 a.m. have oc- curred, and these types of lengthy meetings raise questions about public participation and soundness of decisions made. Also, where there is no deadline, there is less incentive for expedit- ing discussion on the part of the public, staff, and the Council. Analysis: Active cities, such as ours, tend to have many Council items on the agendas and much public, staff and Council comment. Councils can meet earlier, more regularly, or limit items to avoid late meetings, but there is still the potential of late meetings ab- sent a deadline for adjourning. When a deadline has been es- tablished and is included on the agenda, the need to expedite discussion and action is known by all. When the deadline nears, more urgent items can be moved up on the agenda so they may be considered that evening. Less urgent items then can be held over to the following meeting. The Council also has the option to extend the meeting by majority vote or adjourn to a later meeting to finish items. ev in B. Northc aft City Manager KBN/ld 10b committees. Both were formed to perform certain purposes and functions. One was formed to determine what to do with the railroad right-of-way and the other was formed to determine whether safety measures were needed for The Strand. Once their purpose is accomplished, these committees should necessarily disband. The issue is not the degree of the problem or its seriousness to the community but rather whether the committee will be an ongoing overseer of a certain type of problem or " e formed to accomplish a certain goal and then terminated. Enclosure NOTED: I Respectfull sub�itted AMES P. LOUGH, City Attorney ITY OF HERMOSA BEACH N NORT i ,• T FT, City Manager NOTED: fKA HLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk ote.;67U4, CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Pursuant to the City Attorney's the following subcommittees are City -Community Relations City -County Relations advice and the City Clerk's coding, inactive and should be disbanded: State Legislative Review T ns q��d. ng The subcommittees listed below are ca gorized as being ubject to noticing requirements. It is recommended the Council determine for each if a delegate and alternate assignment would be as appropriate. Beach C'ties Comm. City-Scito District Relations Fire/Polies: Relations ii ' ' ' '•40 le 2 Business Relations Comm. Coordinating Council Planning Subcommittee SUFKE.MENTAL INFORMATION lib Law Offices of James P. Lough JAMES P. LOUGH TO: FROM: RE: April 5, 1988 MEMORANDUM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 30 NORTH RAYMOND AVENUE SUITE 708 PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91103 (213) 381-6131 (818) 792-4728 (818) 792-4776 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 11, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council James P. Lough, City Attorney Subcommittees and the Brown Act Recommended Action: For council to set policy to disband those subcommittees it deems unnecessary on a permanent basis. At a previous meeting, the city attorney was directed to bring back to the council an opinion on the impact of the Brown Act on current city council committees. Attached is a listing of committees and other organizations in which the council sends delegates. Basically, permanent subcommittees that recommend legislation to the city council have been considered subject to the Brown Act. The other organizations which the city council sends dele- gates to are not subject to the Brown Act because there is a councilmember/delegate on their committee. However, many of the other organizations that the city sends delegates to are govern- mental entities and, therefore, subject to the Brown Act. Each of these entities does its own noticing. As to pure subcommittees which are made up of two members of the city council and possibly other members of the community, those permanent committees should comply with the Brown Act. Some committees started as temporary and, over time, became permanent and should now follow Brown Act rules. The best example of this is the business relations subcommittee. Previ- ously, it was formed on an ad hoc basis based on a particular problem. More recently, it has taken on a more permanent nature and, in addition to the fact that it meets with members of the general public, these changes over time require us to follow the noticing procedures in the Brown Act. Other committees, such as the city -county relations commit- tee, have not met in recent memory. Such committees cannot be considered permanent since most of the committees that fall into this category have not met in the last four years. It is recom- mended that committees that fall into this category be disbanded and reformed when the need arises. Finally, there are committees of a temporary nature which have met for a specific purpose. Two examples of this type of committee are the railroad right-of-way and Strand safety 11b committees. Both were formed to perform certain purposes and functions. One was formed to determine what to do with the railroad right-of-way and the other was formed to determine whether safety measures were needed for The Strand. Once their purpose is accomplished, these committees should necessarily disband. The issue is not the degree of the problem or its seriousness to the community but rather whether the committee will be an ongoing overseer of a certain type of problem orne formed to accomplish a certain goal and then terminated. Respectfull \ ted, Enclosure NOTED: AMES P. LOUGH, City Attorney ITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VIN B. NORTIRAFT, City Manager NOTED: fKA HLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk • CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Pursuant to the City Attorney's the following subcommittees are City -Community Relations City -County Relations advice and the City Clerk's coding, inactive and should be disbanded: State Legislative Review Transportation & Parking The subcommittees listed below are categorized as being subject to noticing requirements. It is recommended the Council determine for each if a delegate and alternate assignment would be as appropriate. 2 Date: March 10, 1988 CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION OF DELEGATES, ALTERNATE APPOINTMENTS AND/OR REAPPOINTMENT Appointments made: (4) Beach Cities Committee Delegate Simpson Delegate Rosenberger (1,2) Independent Cities Association Delegate Simpson (1,2) (1,2) (1,2) (1,2) (2) Alternate Rosenberger Independent Cities Risk Management Association Delegate Sheldon Resolution No. 87-5095 Alternate Blackwood Inglewood Fire Training Authority Commission (same as South Bay Sanitation District) Delegate Simpson (3-8-88) Alternate Rosenberger (3-8-88) League of California Cities - Board of Directors Delegate Rosenberger Alternate Creighton Los Angeles County/City Selection Committee (must appoint alter- nate separately each time if unable to attend when meeting is called.) Mayor Simpson Sister City Association, Inc. Delegate Williams Alternate Sheldon (1) South Bay Cities Association Delegate Simpson Delegate Williams 1 (1,2) South Bay Cities Sanitation District (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (1,2) (2) (1,2) (1,2) (1,2) Delegate Simpson Alternate Rosenberger South Bay Corridor Study Steering Committee Delegate Williams Alternate Creighton South Bay Juvenile Diversion Project Delegate Sheldon, alternate Rosenberger South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority Delegate Rosenberger Primary Alternate Sheldon (other three councilmembers are back-up alternates Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Delegate Simpson Alternate Sheldon Southern California Rapid Transit District (by Resolution) Delegate Simpson Resolution No. 87-5085 Alternate Rosenberger (2,3) West Basin Water Association Delegate Simpson SUBCOMMITTEES (4) Business Relations Councilmember Councilmember Rosenberger Williams (3) City Community Relations Committee of the Council Councilmember Creighton Councilmember Sheldon 2 (3) City -County Relations Councilmember Williams Councilmember Rosenberger (4) City -School District Relations Councilmember Creighton Councilmember Simpson (4) Coordinating Council Councilmember Williams (4) (4) (5) (3) (3) (5) Councilmember Sheldon Fire and Police Relations Councilmember Williams Councilmember Creighton Planning Councilmember Sheldon Councilmember Rosenberger Railroad Right -of -Way Councilmember Rosenberger Councilmember Simpson State Legislation Review/Recommendation Councilmember Williams Councilmember Creighton Transportation & Parking Subcommittee Councilmember Williams Councilmember Rosenberger Strand Safety Committee Councilmember Williams Councilmember Rosenberger. 3 (5) Litigation (Temporary) Councilmember Creighton Councilmember Sheldon CITY CLERK NOTES: 1. Do their own posting or send to City Clerk for posting. 2. Does not fall under requirements because only 1 member attends. 3. Has not met in recent past. 4. Appears to fall under the requirements of Brown Act. 5. Temporary committee. April 6, 1988 City Council Meeting April 12, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council PLANNING COMMISSION EXPIRATION OF TERMS Recommendation City Council to make a policy determination regarding the necessity for actively soliciting applications for the two Planning Commission terms expiring June 30, 1988. Such solicitation could be done by newspaper advertising, or Council could determine that the applications on file were sufficient and the posting of a notice of expiration of terms would suffice. Background On June 30, 1988, the terms for Planning Commissioners Gerald Compton and Tony DeBellis will expire, however, both Commissioners are eligible for reappointment. At the present time, we have five applications on file. The following applicants have been contacted and have indicated their interest in serving on the Planning Commission: Rhett D. Beavers, 606 Hollowell Avenue Rick Colman, 502 Longfellow John R. Edwards, 501-33 Herondo Street Christine M. Ketz, 335 - 31st Street Howard M. Simon, 2436 Palm Drive The Commission appointments will be scheduled for June 14, 1988 and at that time you will be given all completed applications. If Council wishes the City Clerk's office to advertise for additional applicants, this should be done by May 26, 1988 at the latest. Concur: 4 FT, City Manager 1�A EVIN B. NORTH KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk 11d April 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of April 12, 1988 CONSIDERATION OF BALLOT MEASURES FOR NOVEMBER, 1988 Recommendation: That the City Council appoint a temporary subcommittee and direct the subcommittee and staff to propose language for clear options on uses of the Biltmore Site. Background: At the March 22 Council meeting, Councilmember Creighton and I suggested the possibility of providing staff input in the formulation of possible ballot measures on the Biltmore Site. This is in response both to prior Council interest in such measures and the existence of a proposed initiative on the same subject (since the discussion on March 22, another initiative on this subject has been proposed). Analysis: Given the current high interest in the disposition of the Biltmore Site and the generally recognized view that the public should decide this matter, it seems appropriate to begin legal and policy research into how clear choices might most appropriately be offered to the public. A thorough effor hopefully will result in a clear and implementable decision that will resolve this long-standing issue in our community. A suggested way of beginning this process would be for the Council to appoint two of its members to work with the City Attorney and staff to develop some possible language for review by the public and eventual approval by the City Council. Kevin B. Nort r -ft City Manager KBN/ld 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH VEHICLE PARK- ING DISTRICT #1 held on Tuesday, March 8, 1988 at the hour of 11:45 p.m. ROLL CALL Chairman Etta Simpson - Absent Acting Chairman Jim Rosenberger - Present _ Commissioner June Williams - Present Commissioner Roger Creighton - Present Commissioner Chuck Sheldon - Present A. Minutes of the Vehicle Parking District Meeting of October 27, 1987 Action: To approve minutes of October 27, 1987 Motion Commissioner Williams, second Rosenberger, noting the abstentions of Commissioners Sheldon and Creighton, so ordered. B. Discussion regarding validation program Recommendation by the Business Relations Sub -Committee of the City Council that the Vehicle Parking District Commission establish an on-going policy pertaining to sharing the cost of merchant validations. Action: To direct staff to bring back to the Commissio- ners at the next meeting with a period by period break- down of what it cost to share. Motion by Commissioner Creighton, second Sheldon for the purpose of discussion. Motion withdrawn. Action: To freeze the vals at twenty cents, current rate $1.OQ per 1/2 hr. in,the summer time and 50 cents per 1/2 hr. in the winter time with the maximums stated 12 and 5 dollars, as the current year plan. Charge $8.00 per book for the validations. Motion Commissioner Rosenberger, second Sheldon, noting Commissioner Williams objection, so ordered. Commission Sheldon raised the question as to why we continue to have a Vehicle Parking District. After some discussion, the following motion was made; Action: To direct staff to come back with a report as to the reasons for or against continuing to have a Vehicle Parking District. Motion Commissioner Sheldon, second Creighton, so ordered. ADJOURNMENT: 12:15 A.M. 13a April 4, 1988 Honorable Chairman and Members Vehicle Parking District of the Vehicle Parking District Meeting of April 12, 1988 STATUS REPORT REGARDING THE PROS AND CONS OF ELIMINATING THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT Recommendation: It is recommended that the Vehicle Parking District Commissioners receive and file this report. Background: At your regularly scheduled meeting of March 3, 1988, the Commissioners directed staff to come back with a report as to the reasons for or against continuing to have a Vehicle Parking District. Analysis: We are waiting for input from the City Attorney regarding the legal ramifications, if any, of disbanding the district and also for the mechanisms by which we would proceed. In the meantime, our research indicates the following; PRO 1. Continuity: Since the District is already established, there would be no problem should there be any movement in the down- town area toward growth, reconstruction, etc. If the district was eliminated, we yould have to go through the process again which would require the property owners to petition the Council for an assessment district. 2. Credit History: In the event that a need for a parking stru- cture, in the downtown area, is determined, financing would not be a problem. 3. Vehicle -in -lieu fees: The Local Coastal Plan provides for a program, within the district, whereby if physical contraints limit the provision of commercial parking spaces on site, the applicant shall commit himself/herself to a program of miti- gation for the number of parking spaces not provided. Such a program shall be the payment of in -lieu fees to the Vehicle Parking District or its successor agency. One would imagine that a successor agency could be designated as the City Council and enabling ordinances, etc., could be amended to reflect same. However, to continue with the ability to have in -lieu fees, specific boundaries would have to be estab- lished. Why reinvent the wheel? - 1 - 3b 4. Investment Potential: The City Treasurer is proposing that he can increase his ability to invest funds in LAIF by utilizing the District as a separate entity (see separate agenda item on this meeting). CON Other than the fact that the bonds have been paid off and the District is currently in a state of inertia, we cannot determine any practical reason to disband the District. Perhaps the City Attorney will have more to offer on this issue. J Noon Parking Administrator Concur: Kevin B. Norticraft City Manager 2 April 6, 1988 Honorable Chairman and Vehicle City Council Meeting Parking District Commissioners April 12, 1988 RFQBYST FQR _AUTH0nZATION. TQ9PFN _ SFCQNQ LLA, I.F,. ACCOUNT RecomTerldation: To adopt the attached resolution authorizing the dity Treasurer to open a second State Local Agency Investment Fund account Background: State law authorized local agencies to deposit money with the State Treasurers office for purposes if investment by the State Treasurer. The maximum balance per account is five million dollars. The benefit of having money invested in LAIF is that it gives us overnight deposit and withdrawal flexibility. As a small municipal investor we can take advantage of larger investor investment returns. Analysis: The City of Hermosa Beach presently has one LAIF account. However, because the council sits as a Vehicle Parking District, we are legally allowed one additional LAIF account. The second account would allow the city to safely invest more money with the State. Respectfully submitted, ar Br soh, City Treasurer Concur: evin Nort ere t City Manager Ie 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE CITY TREASURER TO OPEN A SECOND STATE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND ACCOUNT WHEREAS, Pursuant to Chapter 730 of the statutes of 1976 Section 16429.1 was added to the California Government Code to create a Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury for the deposit of money of a local agency for purposes of investment by the State Treasurer; and WHEREAS, The yehialg;_Earlcing,. Dist riot does hereby find that the deposit and withdrawal of money in the Local Agency Investment Fund in accordance with the provisions of Section 16429.1 of the Government Code for the purpose of investment as stated therein as in the best interests of the City of Hermosa Beach. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 1(e10.g_Qarking Qiptriot does hereby authorize the deposit and withdrawal of Hermosa Beach monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury in accordance with the provisions of Section 16429.1 of the Government Code for the purpose of investment as stated therein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following Hermosa Beach officers or their successors in office shall be authorized to // // // // // // 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 order the deposit or withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund: Gary L. Brutseh, City Treasurer Dianne E. Fairchild, Deputy City Treasurer PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF APRIL 1988. CHAIRMAN of the Vehicle Parking District Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: SECRETARY Vehicle Parking District Commission APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY SCALE: I" = 20' PARCEL MAP NO. 18813 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT tl , TRACT NO. 1851 AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 25, PAGE 40 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. COMPASS ENGINEERING CO. INC. SUBG3Y!//O6"F_s / /14fqe-Br Tf7•97 / -9it1 774/4" sz/ '/P7..r 'F 73'6 G.l4'i 5 /4/cGL' 27 M✓/Ty/it/ 7'M 556rG/1'rsZa/v Syof✓iv o(v 77//S 411 w/72V//(/ 0/57-/4/c7-717 80/7 ftp Z./A/51 -4it/p / -14!)/V5-4/7"-- 771-/. 14!)/ 5-4/7 /���'©- 4rio V �4i 7 .�'/G //t/q a 4/O A1.9/' /t/A' ST.9TE OF GAL/�o�it/�9 Goz,,tiTK zdo5 .9E4ES ss, t//mac./ suBpiv/oir 40Av T -yrs //,'W v�Y o� 414ive//4/ePX ,X988, B�Fo?rE NoBL is iiV 9.vi7' Fes' 6,49/ s7797E, A9o�E.y�Eo GtCll�/tet/ fi'e'�sa/c/1,c L y .Yivow,v 7 ME' OR oifOvEo T1, �1�' Gw ryE B,95 -1s -'?/ipENCE To ,BE- T,SE OElrSoif/ h/yoSE /t/.y/ifE /S Sz/BSC,Q/rFp To Tii�6 �✓/may/i(/ /it/STiPe-/MEivT .4iV� ,4G�N0!✓L E��dEl7 E.IEc�T,�p ryE sgyE. iP.gyitiovv d. e"erE,�r�r NOTi9iey rki3OL/C - GSL /=OrPA//meq C'oe/A,/ jy OF G OS /9it/yEGE✓�- � �voT.��Y o�B�/c' /►?y COMM/SS/O�v EXE/,(�E,S Mf�i�Cf1�3, /988. ��yM��� `� ��TA / .yEt?EBi� GE•?T/Ff� 7-77/.97- AGL .455E55MEit/T5 v/E// I. E/‘/,Q/SD/CT/D/t/ Gid 774 /X G/7 -JX OF H6-1PMo5.4 BEgcy To i✓y/4' 77/E" GAtfil/(/cG UOEO /.t/ 77/4' f✓/Tf�/,t/ SUBp/!//S70,t/ orr .qt/Y /5 .SG�Bc/EcT , .4Nv `t//1i'/cy Nl,4Y BE oiq/D div f2/z--L C/TY TiP6.95c/e62r o/c- C/7-/' fcirY oF /7/e3Fryo s,q 6E.9cy C/TY CG62rA-s CE�PT/i�/C•9T�' , " •5��f�4-25rff CECT/may T,ygT TyE C/Ty 6104/4/C/G '/T_Y Ori ,v4fr/fgo5•-/ ,6-6•1 »' 45 ,47 T;opt/ _4 7_ /T"5 s�s5/o4/ oA/ TSE" P.4 / 98 7 ,9of0Pirov�O Tye ,q/ti�/E"Y�'p �:.4 ,G�.9TE'O •" ,BY• - cyrt' 7;9 cry • SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET Etic�/�vEE� s CECT/Ficg7� 7y/5 /11AO �✓�9.� P�E�i�i��� $/' ME GIQ !/�l/06'/r D/�EGT/ON •9i/P' /149- �Ecvyry v Cair/F��irll.9it/CE T.y TyE irEqW/FrMEiVTS Gam" Tf,E SUBp/j//S/oil/ CT CNV GOG.9G c1/9G'/i1/�gNCE .9T TyE /4EQz.,/-sT aF e„/EiPO�?� a‘‘/v /4/ .91194/5T, /987. f�E�QE�lY S779TE ry,9r ryrs Oi9�F:EG sc45ST.y�t/T,9Gz-Y Cov,=-orTirfs* To 77/E C4.ti0/T/oit�gLG gOOif7 vEp Y/TZ/f" /:'/ / , /�C. E': ,Zc� 3 z 7 /rEa/.cam ,p•-.77-4, A/o. /85•/, /11B. zs - �a . 010f/6:g s o#4- f�,qL P;z1 G _ /PL/T.y��'��f�� �/�f�OiLlE J. v/iV DGll1/rt/ /('-l-///t/ /v>,-;41//5/1-/ ,r/r�JB��PL/E P. Ale'T�1//.0/d/ carr E•v���vE-E�s CE�?T/�/G,gTE' .' 7395 .41.451/7 `i// 7-y 7-7/6 /rEQe//rrEMEivTS De) NA f G/Yl' PGi9�/rt/ER./� CE.�T/rte/CA7E " / cgx•-77,�1� Tf�i�T Thi f�i✓NEXEo X1.90 Ga/v/o/eitlS SUB✓rTf"N77,4GG y 77l 72i 7/77?kE Al/ 4/4° 7;;4'4 �Gf�i�/A/iA/y�GOr�Jrti/�/ON 4#t./ ?4/ �� , /76'- P'47xv.* Br.' 6EGRE7;91PPV l'Z,94v1iiv� CaVaWt//4//ti NOTE .' T�`�'/SUBS/!//S/O/!/ /S ,95 4 Co,�1/it/zUM /4"rafr-70,P 2 vi(//TS ti/.yE�EBf� THE 4i✓�!/S �F TyE !�N/7":5 of •9/fT S/WC 484G yolp .qi!/ Uii/p/I//OEp /r1�TE�EST /.v T.yE Com-At,iot/ " 95 4Y.y/G,h' W/GG � /it/ T�//Pil/, T.yE �t/6'GES 5.9fi /� -49G G ESS ,q�/p e/7" -/G/79 UNITS. EASEMENT AXoTE." G✓irIf/PE-A/ /LL E-4 Orc AiVEr4S�iHE/�//A/z5 ,4 S OEF� /N 5''A // 7 , �Aq6-- 7 0�"' 1;›-lP.S", X05 ,4A/t--"Z ES Cc/,I/77'. //o7E .' 6,9/p e"-;45EiW47VT /S BG,4N,k7 /4/ N.4TU1�� LOMA 0 /NO/GA T�S' 77/E BOUNOA/4'Y OA- SuBp/ViOEO BY 77 -WS A1/1/.7 0 N d' /2 ° so'oo'w A// 2 ° 50 DO 2.%/ 30. 00' DRIVE RI GO.DO' 3O Do 0 N 52/ �ivE o� �v7 moo, ‘z/t/' ' • • I\V\ 06 \t II ktt N ‘11 '`N % k \ 6 \),, v,A %k0 t k'..‘• 'i,..1 1\ ... 'V\ k \eNt''‘ ttAtk t $'4,t\1\ kA%\ \,,,,‘\ ,,,,,,tk, , t, , 0,, 0 -k lki .,.o,,\- -%'oW,k1\ti �o vo% k?., w,,‘%,,,I\ I\ \‘t N-kti\I\ k N \t\.,Ck\\J \ 2, 612 Sq • 0 -0 N ° SUNSET 30. OD ' /V/2° /0'6,0'4' N/20/OGD"w 6.4 DRIVE N 0 O (f) FD G �` T PES FFALI. A/O /4&/9 P/L1. B. /- 20 A/�/G f'/V Ivo. /4a/ 9, /'/1B /48 - Zo SCALE: I = 30' PARCEL MAP N0. 18 8 35 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 27, TRACT NO. 1516 AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 25 , PAGE 39 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. COMPASS ENGINEERING CO INC. e.�NI SC/BO/�//Oi�-% CECT/F/C�gTE- ' , -� ..,.• ,z/t''6"23") c'6;r7-7/c-- / ,9fA, .5-4/4e://,/47.7r OF T•�� LA�(/l7s W/Ty/N TyE SUB p/!//S/ON S,+'7JV4/ 04/ 771/ 5' Ai, M7V/N Tye viST/NC,BOirpe-A;'G/�t/E's , AND /COAVSE�T TO 7-79e1' �i��'pq,�igT/o�V y�t/O f /L/N.�� OF"' S�O /i1.9� .4Np SUBO////S/OA/ STiTE S S CoU�t/Ty o� G,Os �yl/�EGEs� ovryi //Th' v -9r �- �s��v�,9.�y / 988, ,A-exe3Zrc /4/ s.9��sr.9rE oE�saN�9G� t� .9Oo�•9rf'.�L� t//rt/ oEFr".�N.9lG Y /riilaA/N Ofd ��4Y�� TO /yE" oit/ 774.-- 4:0.95"/S ate' S.977 ��9G'T���/ E"!�7,e�it/CoE,r%5oN t-✓y45� A/�9•A-lam/5 StiBsc�/BEO To TyE 11// 7"7//4/ /rl/ST�viylEil/T .9Np .gGf�if/Ol�GE���p rb M� r,��9r f7/ ��ECUTEO iVOT,gF�/C C/TY 7-421.--,°95e//r/f".1,5 hE--B/CW'T/may 44'7 i955ESS/le-A/TS LE!//E� !�/l/�E.Q Tfi'� !../!./..prS' p/c T/Dit/ Off" Th�E Taj `i/,�,�/GL/4/ Ti,e- 1.7// /A/ SUB�/Y/S/Oi(/ o,Q y/S S�BvECT, ,4,VI M.9Y O�9/D /it/ FUGG, h'• " 9/ f l.G T�0.' BY. C/TY a� A.E�iyoS,9 C/7 -I' CG EfP/f S CE,QT/F/C.9TE . i cE�771,9 7 Tye city cocivcic. o,� rye city o� .y�-�iyas� �'-qc v �sy .yor�c�v -9vooTE� cyv THS' , / 988, �oPf�OliE� T.y� •9�(/�t/E.I�El� �l�� vgrEv . • .ter o/c - 6"/ 1v aF yE�i(145r9 k'dtI (r) LOMA0(° 0 52f L/A/E" o/4"-- L 0T 28, TACT Ivo. /5/C, /B 25- 3`� Oo DRIVE f° Z_ /1//2 0/o 'oo ' 'r -v /0 .00W 30, 00 '..._ • 1 • (Y) • .�11 so A -r. SUNSET /t//Z°/0",00"h/ SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET n"-/t///t/E/5" CE.4PT/F9TE.' Tyrs M'4'' y49S o/p e./A/0--/TP MY p/F'ECT/ON 4N/.' /t/. 9' CO/11/4:=/G A:we-co/F-430 p�•y TA /N COA/A-arrA,-/-4/VeE W/ Th' 7-77/6-- 17'"qU/lPE/1•1Eit/TS O� 77116' S[,4e1',C,/Y/S/O/f/ /A,4,4" G T .•d fNp LOC9G Oidr/N.g/VC E .9T ThE FrEQU�'S T O� t�EiPl�1�' OGT/it/ /rV .4Y���5 T, /96 7 STATE' Tis.gT' T,y/S �AWCEG B - ST�ivri,44- Cor(/Fo#P7WS To Tf/E ,�9,4:=PFo!/�p ,0,4P em/./ 7-4a/1,444/ f r i90O/PL�/E!� T�N7;9!/E' givr. Y/G7�f� �/.q/, /P'G: 20 32 7 ,?Eca#Fp .47%17>9 /(/40TE.' 774r,9C T /t/a. /S/6 M. B. 2S - 3 9. OwNE•?S /YEv��v7-A!//5/1, M� 7741//S,y �,9L fFL/77-,iEf�"�O�rl, Z//A/ AND .0/1//V/E q. U//t/ C/ Ei/vM/EE� S CECT/F/GqT�' T.S�/S A1.�� C!3/144O,?>yS /-%// .777/ Ti�,�E- il'E�U//f="6-"it G40C.4oho/rvgil/C� C/7 --)S .'z.lt/NE'/75 CEiTT7,z-/CATV / ,5/E�EBY CE.QT/F-Y TiY�gT 7-4," A9.4/0" cave-a1-4-rS SU65T9i1/Tj9e.4✓ � TiSiE 1PAO�R�VEO By Tf1E �A/!/il/At/lj - /Yl/55/oN ON Tye p9/� OF /96'7 D AL fl Y DE:7m IT). MILE • s�-c.�Er-q�r G3� #'2,-94/A-///l/C7 cv':'Af 4/0 72; Tei'/s Sl./.23'17S/eW /S A�O�O�/�p AS .9 CaN�� - M/rl//UN1 �fT4c/EG T F-0/5' 2 !.//t//TS 14!h��FrE6� T.YE" a#1/417 S o� T�/Gc- TS O� �/%� OigC'E" /iG iyaGp .9N Ui(/!�/!//pE0 zil/Te-.1EST /tet/ Th'E' Coj4-1MO4/ .d5WEi9S !nVA//cfl A//4 G , /4/ 72'4 774"4- 4,1/' Uric i r/ • .5&" --- Alb- 7 V 7:5' �=AlEivrs rye 4/4// 73 EASEMENT t/'72 -. NAf4' /4:.E2: ta', Nop2r 64'V 42t/7- `OfT #='//EL /NES AS /ow-??. ��EO �TECOyOE� //1/ BOO/f /6/7, oq�E 47 o,C OEEpr") Go5 14Z4' COUNT/! NOTE.' ..e3ZAN/fE7"- /N A./A9T!/�?E /t/2 t' /A/ or 2a, 72?4CT A/0. /5/ ) A1,,8. 2?5" - 3, DRIVE tia zE"�ENO .' • • a /rv0/CSI re -3 T/�E 45,0L'iN�/4r�'Y OF Tf�E Z,44/G7 BE/NCS SUB - �/!//DEO Br 7-y�S FO. Az , it/o FIEF' ACCE..7a7.47 .95 ,Z3 -7/t/