Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/09/88ACTION SHEET ACTION SHEET AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 9, 1988 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Etta Simpson MAYOR PRO TEM Jim Rosenberger COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Chuck Sheldon June Williams Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch ACTING CITY MANAGER Alana M. Mastrian CITY ATTORNEY James P. Lough All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) Approval of Minutes: Regular meeting of the City Coun- cil held on January 26, 1988. Recommended Action: To approve minutes. (b) Demands and Warrants: February 9, 1988. Recommended Action: To approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Tentative Future Agenda Items. MIKE LAWTON SPOKE RE. THE FACT THAT HE IS IN OPPOSITION TO THE ZONE CHANGE BUT WILL BE OUT OF TOWN ON 2/23 - WOULD LIKE ACTION CONTINUED TO MARCH 8 MTG. COUNCIL SUGGESTED HE WRITE A LETTER TO THAT EFFECT. (d) (e) (f) (g) Recommended Action: To receive and file. City Manager Activity Report: Memorandum from Acting City Manager Alana M. Mastrian dated February 3, 1988. Recommended Action: To receive and file. Approval of supplemental to the General Employees' Bar- gaining Unit MOU establishing the classification of Public Safety Dispatcher in that unit and establishing a salary range for the classification. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 2, 1988. Recommended Action: Authorize City Manager to execute supplemental. Claim for Damages: 1) Paul Barrett Herriott, 123 - 24th St., Hermosa Beach, represented by Geoffrey M. Warren, Atty., 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy., #302, Hermosa Beach, filed January 28, 1988. 2) Russell David Springstead, represented by Gary A. Smith, Esq., 11111 West Olympic Blvd., #300, Los Angeles, CA 90064-1805, filed February 1, 1988. 3) Darrell Lee Greenwald, 1016 Strand, Hermosa Beach, filed February 2, 1988. Recommended Action: To deny claim and refer to City's Claims Adjuster. Report regarding parking enforcement policy pertaining to vehicles blocking the sidewalk. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated January 28, 1988. PULLED BY WI - POLICY NOT BEING FOLLOWED. HAVE HAD MANY COM- PLAINTS ON THIS. CR QUESTIONED IF STATE LAW ALLOWED JUST LEAVING A PEDESTRIAN ACCESS OF 3'? CR/WI MOTION DIRECT C.A. TO COME BACK WITH AN OPINION AS TO WHETHER COUNCIL AND STAFF CAN BE RELIEVED OF LIABILITY IF LAW NOT FOLLOWED. SO ORDERED. Recommended Action: To receive and file. (h) Review of pigeon problem solutions. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated January 28, 1988. Recommended Action: To receive and file. (i) (i) Monthly Investment Report - January, 1988. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated February 1, 1988. Recommended Action: To receive and file. Election calendar for consolidated election June 7, 1988. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated February 2, 1988. Recommended Action: To receive and file. (k) Agreement for street lighting and crossing guard assess- ment engineering services. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 2, 1988. PULLED BY WI. - TO ANNOUNCE THE SAVINGS TO TAXPAYERS. MOTION WI/SI TO APPROVE STAFF REC. SO ORDERED. Recommended Action: To 1) authorize Mayor to sign agreement with Patrick N. Rossetti for the provision of continued street lighting and crossing guards assessment engineering services for costs not to exceed: $32,450 for street lighting and $12,100 for crossing guards, and 2) authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. (1) Award of Bid Pier Lighting Grounding System (CIP 85- 203). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 2, 1988. Recommended Action: To 1) authorize Mayor to sign agreement with Parker Diving Service for repair of pier lighting grounding system in an amount not to exceed $30,062; 2) authorize staff to issue change orders as necessary; and 3) transfer $19,062 from CIP 85-201 (Light Conversion and New Installation) to CIP 85-203. (m) Downtown sidewalk steam cleaning. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 2, 1988. (n) (0) Recommended Action: To authorize the second downtown sidewalk cleaning. Hope Chapel Lease. Memorandum from Acting Community Resources Director Mary C. Rooney dated February 3, 1988. Recommended Action: To approve lease agreement between City of Hermosa Beach and Hope Chapel for Room 13 in the Community Center. Acceptance of inspection and contract administration services as complete, sanitary sewer replacement target area II (CIP 85-402). Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Anthony Antich dated February 2, 1988. 3 Recommended Action: To 1) accept as complete the in- spection and contract administration services completed by ASL Consulting Engineers for the Sanitary Sewer Re- placement, Target Area 2, CIP 85-402, and 2) transfer $77,825 excess funds from CIP 85-402 to CIP 87-405. ***************************************************************** Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any item listed under Consent Ordinances and Resolutions may do so at this time. ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING: After the City Clerk has read the title to any resolution or or- dinance on tonight's agenda, the further reading thereof be waived, reserving and guaranteeing to each Councilmember the right to demand the reading of any such resolution or ordinance in regular order. ***************************************************************** 2. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PARKING ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF STREET ON STREET CLEANING DAYS FOR VARIOUS STREETS BETWEEN PROSPECT AVENUE AND ARDMORE AVENUE. For adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 1, 1988. MOTION JR/SH - TO ADOPT RESO. SO ORDERED. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Letter from June Williams dated January 30, 1988 re. a workshop meeting with L. A. County Office of Alcohol Programs and the Prevention Research Center of Berkeley. MOTION WI/SI TO R & F. SO ORDERED. Recommended Action: To receive and file. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DELETING TICKET BROKER FROM THE C-1 ZONE AND ADDING TICKET BROKER/SALES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE C-2 ZONE PERMITTED USE LIST AND ADOPTING AN EN- VIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated February 2, 1988. MOTION SH/CR - TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE. SO ORDERED. ********************************************************t4+k*tk***** Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any of the remaining items on the agenda may request to do so at the time the item is called. ***************************************************************** MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - TOXIC WASTE SOIL CONTAMINATION. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated February 3, 1988. MOTION CR/JR - SEND TO PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR TO CHECK WITH EN- VIRONMENTAL AGENCY TO SEE IF ANY HISTORY OF PAST SPILLS. MOTION IS FOR A RECORDS CHECK ONLY. SO ORDERED. Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Oral discussion of possibility of construction of a parking structure at 14th and Manhattan Avenue, request- ed by Councilmember Williams at November 10, 1987 meeting. MOTION WI/CR - TO DIRECT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO REPORT BACK AT NEXT COUNCIL MEETING RE. IF PARKING STRUCTURE BUILT THERE, HOW MUCH OF EACH FLOOR WOULD BE TAKEN UP WITH RAMP, AND ALSO INVESTI- GATE A STRUCTURE THAT IS ENTERED FROM TWO LEVELS. SO ORDERED. (b) Report from City Attorney James P. Lough dated February 3, 1988 re. OSPAC proposed ballot measure on earmarking the 4% increased U.U.T. for purchase of railroad right- of-way. SI - BROUGHT UP LEGISLATIVE BULLETIN RE. U.U.T TAX. MOTION SI/WI THAT THERE IS A NEED TO TAKE ACTION SINCE THIS CAME UP AFTER AGENDA POSTED. OK 5-0 SI/WI - MOTION TO SEND LETTER TO ALL COMMITTEE MEMBERS ENDORSING LEAGUE'S POSITION WITH MAYOR'S SIGNATURE AND SIGNATURES OF ANY OTHER COUNCILMEMBERS WHO WISH TO SIGN. OK 4-1 (CR -NO.) JPL ASKED FOR BRIEF CLOSED SESSION ON 8(b) TO DEAL WITH PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF R -O -W. CR/JR. SO ORDERED. ADJOURNED TO CLOSED SESSION 8:22 P.M. RECONVENED AT 9 P.M. MOTION CR/WI - TO PUT 4% UUT TAX ON BALLOT IN JUNE IN HOPES OF GETTING A 2/3 VOTE SO IT COULD ONLY BE USED UNTIL R -O -W ACQUIRED THEN RETIRED. C.A. TO COME BACK NEXT MTG. WITH APPROPRIATE WORD- ING. 5-0 (c) Statistical data on R-2 zoned lots with a potential of more than 2 units. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 3, 1988. MOTION SH/CR TO R & F REPORT. SO ORDERED (d) Oral discussion of Biltmore Site (requested by Council at the 1/26/88 meeting.) MOTION CR/SI TO R & F OK 5-0 MOTION CR/? - PREPARE A BALLOT PROPOSITION FOR SALE OF OR LAND TRADE OF BILTMORE SITE SUBJECT TO GOVT. CODE THE SALE OR TRADE WOULD BE SOLELY FOR ACQUISITION OF ROW. THERE WOULD BE AN M.A.I. APPRAISAL TO DETERMINE HIGHEST AND BEST USE. THIS WOULD BE A MANDATORY ORDINANCE. OK 5-0, MOTION SH/COMPANION MEASURE ON BALLOT - CITY RETAIN PROPERTY AND TURN IT INTO A PARK; ANY CHANGE WOULD BE ONLY BY VOTE OF PEOPLE. SECOND WI. HIS WOULD ALSO BE MANDATORY ORDINANCE. OK 4-1 (JR -NO) MOTION CR TO AUTHORIZE JR TO DRAFT A SUGGESTED BALLOT MEASURE IN NEXT FEW DAYS RE. PRESERVING COMMERCIAL ZONING, ETC. (WITHIN 48 HOURS) AND THEN BRING IT BACK ALONG WITH THE OTHER MEASURES. SECOND SH. OK 5-0 (e) Report re. ATSF right-of-way. WI SAID SHE WANTED TO PASS OUT TO PUBLIC INFORMATION GIVEN TO COUNCIL ON SUGGESTED WAYS TO FINANCE R -O -W. ENTIRE COUNCIL OBJECTED. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Discussion requested by Councilmember Williams re. requiring interviews for prospective Planning Commissioners. MOTION JR/CR TO REQUIRE INTERVIEWS. FAILS 2-3 (CR/SI/SH-NO) Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. WI - ASKED FOR TREASURER REPORT ON U.U.T. TO BE AGENDIZED WHEN NEW C.M. ARRIVES. CR - WOULD LIKE A.C.M. TO HAVE A COPY OF REPORT WHERE U.U.T. FUNDS HAVE BEEN GOING. SH ASKED ABOUT A WELCOMING PARTY FOR NEW C.M.? CR WOULD LIKE TO HAVE STAFF GET HOLD OF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO HAVE A MIXER FOR INTRODUCTION OF C.M. TO COMMUNITY. 6 CLERK WILL DO PUNCH AND COOKIES NEXT MEETING. WI - READ FROM NEWSPAPER ARTICLE RE. TOXIC WASTE - HAVE STAFF DO A REPORT ON WHAT OUR CITY CAN DO WITH THIS. SHE SUGGESTS MAYBE A ONCE A YEAR PICKUP BY BFI. APPEARANCE OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any matter within the jurisdiction of the Council not elsewhere considered on the agenda may do so at this time. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to sub- mit those comments in writing to the City Manager. ADJOURNMENT AT 10:10 P.M. i "Man's actions are the picture book of his creeds." - Emerson AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 9, 1988 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Etta Simpson MAYOR PRO TEM Jim Rosenberger COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Chuck Sheldon June Williams Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch ACTING CITY MANAGER Alana M. Mastrian CITY ATTORNEY James P. Lough All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) Approval of cil held on Recommended (b) Demands and Minutes: Regular meeting of the City Coun- January 26, 1988. ITTA .96sFAJ7- Action: To approve minutes. Warrants: February 9, 1988. Recommended Action: To approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. NEW CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 30, 1987: MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. • Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law tbat regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown -parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business district. (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) P (h) (i) (j) --;b41,4, �� k oar' Tentative Future Agenda Items. Recommended Action: To receive and file. City Manager Activity Report: Memorandum from Acting City Manager Alana M. Mastrian dated February 3, 1988. Recommended Action: To receive and file. Approval of supplemental to the General Employees' Bar- gaining Unit MOU establishing the classification of Public Safety Dispatcher in that unit and establishing a salary range for the classification. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 2, 1988. Recommended Action: Authorize City Manager to execute supplemental. Claim for Damages: 1) Paul Barrett Herriott, 123 - 24th St., Hermosa Beach, represented by Geoffrey M. Warren, Atty., 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy., #302, Hermosa Beach, filed January 28, 1988. 2) Russell David Springstead, represented by Gary A. Smith, Esq., 11111 West Olympic Blvd., #300, Los Angeles, CA 90064-1805, filed February 1, 1988. 3) Darrell Lee Greenwald, 1016 Strand, Hermosa Beach, filed February 2, 1988. Recommended Action: To deny claim and refer to City's Claims Adjuster. Report regarding parking enforcement policy pertaining to vehicles blocking the sidewalk. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated January 28, 1988. Recommended Action: To receive and file. Review of pigeon problem solutions. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated January 28, 1988. Recommended Action: To receive and file. Monthly Investment Report - January, 1988. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated February 1, 1988. Recommended Action: To receive and file. Election calendar for consolidated election June 7, 1988. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated February 2, 1988. Recommended Action: To receive and file. (k)e Agreement for street lighting and crossing guard assess- ment engineering services. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 2, 1988. Recommended Action: To 1) authorize Mayor to sign agreement with Patrick N. Rossetti for the provision of continued street lighting and crossing guards assessment engineering services for costs not to exceed: $32,450 for street lighting and $12,100 for crossing guards, and 2) authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. (1) Award of Bid Pier Lighting Grounding System (CIP 85- 203). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 2, 1988. Recommended Action: To 1) authorize Mayor to sign agreement with Parker Diving Service for repair of pier lighting grounding system in an amount not to exceed $30,062; 2) authorize staff to issue change orders as necessary; and 3) transfer $19,062 from CIP 85-201 (Light Conversion and New Installation) to CIP 85-203. (m) Downtown sidewalk steam cleaning. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 2, 1988. (n) Recommended Action: To authorize the second downtown sidewalk cleaning. Hope Chapel Lease. Memorandum from Acting Community Resources Director Mary C. Rooney dated February 3, 1988. Recommended Action: To approve lease agreement between City of Hermosa Beach and Hope Chapel for Room 13 in the Community Center. (o) Acceptance of inspection and contract administration services as complete, sanitary sewer replacement target area II (CIP 85-402). Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Anthony Antich dated February 2, 1988. Recommended Action: To 1) accept as complete the in- spection and contract administration services completed by ASL Consulting Engineers for the Sanitary Sewer Re- placement, Target Area 2, CIP 85-402, and 2) transfer $77,825 excess funds from CIP 85-402 to CIP 87-405. ***************************************************************** Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any item listed under Consent Ordinances and Resolutions may do so at this time. ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING: After the City Clerk has read the title to any resolution or or- dinance on tonight's agenda, the further reading thereof be waived, reserving and guaranteeing to each Councilmember the right to demand the reading of any such resolution or ordinance in regular order. ***************************************************************** 2. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PARKING ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF STREET ON STREET CLEANING DAYS FOR VARIOUS STREETS BETWEEN PROSPECT AVENUE AND ARDMORE AVENUE. For adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 1, 1988. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Letter from June Williams dated January 30, 1988 re. a workshop meeting with L. A. County Office of Alcohol Programs and the Prevention Research Center of Berkeley. Recommended Action: To receive and file. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DELETING TICKET BROKER FROM THE C-1 ZONE AND ADDING TICKET BROKER/SALES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE C-2 ZONE PERMITTED USE LIST AND ADOPTING AN EN- VIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated February 2, 1988. ***************************************************************** Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any of the remaining items on the agenda may request to do so at the time the item is called. ***************************************************************** MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - TOXIC WASTE SOIL CONTAMINATION. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated February 3, 1988. Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL 1P14 01924-1 'e+4 Oral discussion of possibility of construction of a parking structure at 14th and Manhattan Avenue, request- ed by Councilmember Williams at November 10, 1987 meeting. Report from City Attorney James P. Lough dated February 3, 1988 re. OSPAC proposed ballot measure on earmarking the 4% increased U.U.T. for purchase of railroad right- of-way. Statistical data on 1-2 zoned lots with a potential of more than 2 units. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 3, 1988. (d) Oral discussion of Biltmore Site (requested by Council at the 1/26/88 meeting.) Report re. ATSF right-of-way. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Discussion requested by Councilmember Williams re. requiring interviews for prospective Planning Commissioners. (e) 9. Requests (a) Recommended Action: Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2 refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. APPEARANCE OF INTERESTED CITIZENS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any matter within the jurisdiction of the Council not elsewhere considered on the agenda may do so at this time. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to sub- mit those comments in writing to the City Manager. ADJOURNMENT Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 2, 1988 Regular Meeting of February 9, 1988 AGREEMENT FOR STREET LIGHTING AND CROSSING GUARD ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES Reommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Patrick N. Rossetti for the provision of continued street lighting and crossing guards assessment engineering services for costs not to exceed as follows: Fiscal Year Street Lighting Crossing Guards FY 88-89 $18,150 $ 7,700 FY 89-90 14,300 4,400 Total $32,450 $12,100 2. authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. Background: Mr. Rossetti has provided assessment engineering service to the City for the past several years. His current three year agreement will expire March 12, 1988 and he has submitted a new five year proposal for continuing services. Analysis: The January 21, 1988 proposal (Exhibit A) submitted by Mr. Rossetti outlines the assessment engineering services he will continue to provide the City. Street Lighting Assessment This proposal includes a five year program to reduce the total street lighting assessment 10 percent each year for a period of five years resulting in an assessment reduction to the taxpayers of $522,671. Crossing Guards Assessment Based on the current fund balance, it is estimated that a reduction in assessment will adversely affect the crossing guard program. Hence, no reduction in the crossing guard assessment is anticipated. lk Fiscal Impact: The agreement is for a five year period with fees fixed for the first two years and an option to renew the last three years based on a negotiated fee. Fiscal Year * * * FEES * * * Street Lighting Crossing Guards 1988-89 $16,500 $ 7,000 1989-90 13,000 4,000 Total $29,500 $11,000 10% Contingency 2,950 1,100 Cost Not to Exceed $32,450 $12,100 Alternatives: Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by staff are: 1. Not pursue an assessment reduction for street lighting. Respectfully submitted, Concur: 411F Ant "tiny Antich Director of Publ c Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Attachments: Exhibit A AA:mv slcg/v 2 Alana Mastrian,zs4Q;) Acting City Manager .4 441 ' Patrick N. Rossetti EXHIBIT A ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES 2275 W. 25TH ST. #172 SAN PEDRO. CA. 90732 (213) 832-5048 January 21, 1988 THE CITY COUNCIL City Hall Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Honorable Members: The Present Street Lighting Assessment District which provides maintenance and installation for the City of Hermosa Beach, has arrived at a point where the following should be considered for implementation: A. (1) (2) (3) 8. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Consolidate the twelve (12) Benefit Zone areas into approximately six Zones; Re-evaluate all the parcels in the City for refinement of assessable frontages - because of splits, changes, segregations and change of use; and Integrate said changes into the computer Database for the Street Lighting District. The change -over of the street lights through the City to the new high-pressure sodium lights has brought about a considerable savings; All scheduled new installation, to date, has been completed; The accumulative fund for future installation is adequate for necessary implementation costs; The contingency and reserve fund is in excellent condition; and The end -fund balance has grown to the point where consideration may be given to its reduction. Therefore, we propose a five-year program of reducing the total assessment by ten per -cent each year for a period of five years. This will reduce the re-evaluated parcels by said percentage each year. The total amount of estimated savings for the property owners will be approximately $522,679.00 over the five-year period. -A- The Hermosa Beach City Council -2- January 21, 1988 C. A 30 -foot residential lot will be reduced from $41.40 to $24.30 in said five-year period. 0. A 30 -foot commercial lot will be reduced from $142.50 to $83.70 in said five-year period. E. The end -fund balance, now at $1,089,118.00, will be reduced to 5760,730.00 in said five-year period. F. All of the above changes will be implemented into the 1988-1989 assessment year and continuing the changes untilaompleted in 1992-1993. RECOMMENOATION The above services should be authorized as soon as possible in order to be included in the April 15, 1988 Filing of Report date. We thank you for your consideration of the above report. Respectfully submitted, PATRICK N. ROSSETTI • PNR:d -B. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STUDY FOR REDUCING STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENTS BEGINNING IN 1988 FOR A FIVE YEAR PERIOD Shown are the Proposed Rates and Amounts of the Yearly Charges for a 30 Ft. Lot. New Benefit Areas 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 A. $ 1.38 $ 1.24 $ 1.12 $ 1.01 0 $ .81 B. 2.47 $ 2.22 $ 2.00 $ 1.80 $ 1.62 $ 1.46 $7 .20 $ 66.00 $60.00 $54.00 $48. 0 $43.80 C. $ 3.00 1_LV2 $ 2.43 2.19 $ 1.97, $ 1.77 $90.00 $ 1.00 $72.00 5. 0 $59.00 :5:::: 0. $ 3.61 $ 3.24 $ 2.92 $ 2.62 $ 2.36 $$110 .30 $97.20 $87.60 S78.60 $70.80 $63.90 E. $ 4.75 $ 4.27$ 3.84 $ 3.45 $ 3.10 $ 2.79, $142.50 $128.10 $115.20 $103.50 $93.00 :83:74: .7 F. .52 $ .50 $ .50 1...-21 $ .45 $15.0 $15.00 $15000 $13.50 $13.50 $12.15 Total Amt $397,647.00 $357,882.00 $322,094.00 $289,885.00 1260,896.00 $234,807.00 for the year End Fund Bal. for the year $1,089,118.00 $1,091,456.00 $1,058123.00 $990,914.00 $891,356.00 $760,730.00 YEARLY SAVINGS 1988-89 1st yr. $ 39,765.00 1989-90 2nd yr. $ 75,554.00 .1990-91 3rd yr. $107,7 .00 1991-92 4th yr. $136,753.00 1992-93 5th yr. $162,843.00 Total Savings for 5year period $ 522,6 79.00 Assessments reduced by Approx. 35% in five year period. Typical 30 ft. Lot Residential $ 41.40 reduced to $ 24..30 in 5 years. Commercial $ 142.50 reduced to °,$83.70 in five years End of year fund Balance $ 1,091,456.00 reduced to $ 760,730.00 in five years. PATRICK N. ROSSETTI Assessment Engineering Services 2275 West 25th Street - #172 San Pedro, California 90732 THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL City Hall Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California 90254 RE: COMBINING THE ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT AND THE HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT - FISCAL YEARS - 1988-1993 Honorable Members: The undersigned presents herewith a Proposal to render certain Special Assess- ment Engineering Services in connection with: STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT; CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT; and RE-EVALUATION OF THE STREETLIGHTING DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH: The provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Part 2, Division 15, Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the installation of standards, appurtenancesand appurtenant work, and for the furnish- ing of electric current and maintenance of certain lighting fixtures in certain streets in the City of Hermosa Beach, California, and for that certain "Street Lignting Installation and Maintenance District", beginning July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1993, and according to: The provisions of the "Crossing Guards Maintenance D6trict Act of 1974", pur- suant to Article 2, Chapter 3.5, Title 5, and being Division 2, of the Government Code of the State of California, beginning July 1, 1988, and ending June 30, 1993, all as set forth in detail as follows: A. The City of Hermosa Beach to do and/or furnish: (1) Complete set of assessment diagrams; (2) All binders and forms as may be required; (3) Detailed Estimate of Costs (including incidental expenses) and other engineering data as required; and (4) Use of the City's computer, printer, tape drives and other related services. -1- B. The undersigned will do and/or furnish the following services: (1) Consult with and advise the Director of Public Works relative to the preparation of the Diagrams and Costs Estimates; (2) Provide legal descriptions for each parcel of land (Los Angeles County Codes); (3) Review the Tax Code parcel numbers for the changes, make the deletions and add all the new parcels to the Assessment Roils on the Database; (4) Prepare two copies of each Assessment Roll, including the above information, (City and County copies); (5) Calculate and levy the assessment for each parcel of land in keeping with benefits accruing to each parcel; (6) (7) Post the assessment amounts to each parcel of land on the Assessment Rolls; Prepare and assemble the preliminary report as set forth in the Codes, including the review of Plans and Specifications, Estimates of Costs, Diagrams of the Districts and the proposed assessments; (8) File the Reports and Assessment Rolls and Estimates with the City Clerk; (9) Assist in presenting the Assessment Rolls, Preliminary Reports, Diagrams, Specifications, Cost Estimates, and other related data to the City Council for consideration; (10) Provide consultation and advice to any and all officials and assigned employees to assist them in carrying out their duties and responsibilities, as required by law in the above-mentioned proceedings; (11) Attend the Public Hearings of protests and appeals by the City Council and provide the answers to questions by the property owners, to the satisfaction of the City Council; and (12) Upon confirmation of the Assessment Rolls by the City Council, deliver the same (in Magnetic Tape format) to the Los Angeles County Auditor and answer any questions which he or his staff may have. C. Processing of Late Changes Process all late changes which are made by the Los Angeles County Assessor and present a typed copy of same to the Director of Public Works and a copy to the Los Angeles County Auditor's Office for processing and posting to the tax bills prior to mailing. -2- 0. Commence the two-year program of instruction and training for the assigned personnel in the following areas: (7) Collect the Los Angeles County Assessor's parcel number changes for the new year; Obtain the Tax Code Map showing the latest changes; Check the Assessment Rolls Databases containing the Assessment Roll information; Make all deletions of parcel numbers which are no longer valid; Re-evaluate all new parcels and assign new information; Add all new information to the Databases including any change in rates; Confer with the Director of Public Works for finalizing the total assessments for the new year; (8) Instruct the new personnel in the following: a. Review the finalizing of the Databases; b. Review the printing of the Assessment Rolls; c. Review the production of the Magnetic Tapes for the County (this is the Assessment Rolls for posting all assessments to the tax bills). (9) Supervise the City personnel,, as required, in the performance of the services listed above - Items one through nine. This service will be implemented over a period of two years. E. Re -Evaluation of the Street Lighting Maintenance District Over The Two -Year Period 1988-1990, consistina of the following: (1) Review of all existing Benefit Areas in the City District; (2) Review all assessable frontages on all parcels in the City - approximately 7,000; (3) Apply new Benefit Designations where necessary; (4) Apply new assessable Front Footages where necessary; (5) Recalculate all Benefit Areas as to total money amounts; (6) Finalize the Assessment Rolls with all the new changes; (7) Incorporate the above into the final Database for the District. -3- The term of this CONTRACT shall be for the period of time beginning with the date of execution thereof, and ending June 30, 1993. F. ESTIMATED COST FOR TWO YEARS' ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES: ** Assessment Engineering Associate - St. Lighting Crossing Guards 600 Hrs. @ $ 40.00 per hr. - - - - $ 24,000.00 ( $li;+i000.00 $ 6,000.00 ) Secretarial -Technical - 300 hrs. @ $ 30.00 per hr. - - - - $ 9,000.00 ($ 6,000.00 $ 3,000.00 ) Computer Programmer Services - 100 hrs. @ $ 75.00 per hr. - - - - $ 7,500.00 ($ 5,500.00 g 2,000.00 ) Total Estimated Cost - Two Years. .$ 40,500.00 ($29,500.00 $11,000.00 ) The above personnel rates include overhead and the Assessment Engineer's compensation. Compensation Payable as Follows: First Year - 1988-1989 a. $15,000.00 upon filing of the Report; and ($10,000.00 $ 5,000.00 ) b. $ 8,500.00 upon confirmation of the Assessment. ($ 6,500.00 $ 2,000.00 ) Second Year - 1989-1990 a. $ 9,000.00 upon filing of the Report; and ($ 7,000.00 $ 2,000.00 ) b. $ 8,000.00 upon confirmation of the Assessment. ($ 6,000.00 $ 2,000.00 ) G. FUNDS FOR ABOVE COMPENSATION Said total compensation and/or any other monies due the undersigned shall be payable from funds obtained as a result of special assessment district proceed- ings, under the pertinent State statutes. ** Subsequent to the first two years, the City may elect to notify the Consultant of its desire to review, or extend, this CONTRACT for on-going services by nego- tiation between the City's representative and the Consultant for the necessary services required under the Statutes. All information relating to the proposed computer programming services for said Districts shall be held strictly confidential between the City Council and City Staff and Patrick N. Rossetti, Assessment Engineering Services. -4- a• It is the policy of the undersigned to render the highest type of service possible without regard to the time or effort required and which is mutually satisfactory to all parties concerned. Dated: January 21, 1988 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4A A. A fir OP CI ' ATTORNEY IIIP Respectfully submitted, PATRICK N. ROSSETTI Assessment Engineering Services I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PROPOSAL WAS ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AT ITS MEETING HELD ON THE DAY OF Countersigned by: MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. 1988. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. -5- Patrick N. Rossetti ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES 2275 W. 25TH ST. 0172 SAN PEDRO. CA. 90732 (213) 832-5048 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT RE-EVALUATION PROJECT 1988-93 DATED: January 21,1988 . SUBMITTED BY: PATRICK N. ROSSETTI. ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES 2275 W. 25th Street, # 172 SAN PEDRO. CA. 90732 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE • BACKGROUND 1 SCOPE OF PROJECT 2 RE-EVALUATION SERVICES 3 PROPOSED SCHEDULE 4 APPENDIX "A" - PROPOSAL FOR ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES TO BE RENDERED FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT RE-EVALUATION PROJECT. -0- i CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT BACKGROUND The City of Hermosa Beach Street Lighting Maintenance District has been in force for approximately 25 years. During this period, due to certain legal requirements, the policy developed that limited the term of a District to a maximum of five years. Approximately 14 years ago, our firm was instrumental in proposing a new legal procedure, which the State Legislature adopted and passed as the "Landscaping and Street Lighting Act of 1972". Said Act permits the City Council to extend the District in force each year in accordance with the legal requirements of said law. In addition, said law allocates to the City Council authority to terminate a District at the end of each year, simply by not ex- tending same for the new year, and if the funds for same could be provided from other sources. If the City Council should terminate the District for a year or two, and then proposed to re -institute the District, it would be necessary to institute the entire legal procedure to implement a completely new District and Assessment. Further, the present Street Lighting Assessment Fund has the required funding for the Re -Evaluation Service and the integration of the information into the computer Database. The City is familiar with the services which this office renders and the City can be confident that the services will be completed to the very best of our ability as heretofore. -1- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT SCOPE OF PROJECT The City of Hermosa Beach Street Lighting Maintenance District serves the entire area within the City limits. The various areas that have similar lighting intensity are grouped into Benefit Areas and property parcels are treated equally as to size and assessable frontages. THus, each residence of similar size is charged at the same rate in the same benefit area. Each five-year period, in the past. this office re-evaluated the entire City Lighting program to include the County splits and segregations, and these were incorporated into the appropriate benefit areas as required. A complete re-evaluation service is now ten years past due and should be performed this year for the following reasons: 1. A research check revealed that for five years the changes were not extensive and the cost-saving factor was invorled; and 2. In the past five years a great number of modifications have accumulated and it is now important to bring the entire City up to rate and benefit equity; and 3. We are now in the process of computerizing the entire Street Lighting District and the entire information can be incorporated therein at less financial cost. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT RE-EVALUATION PROJECT SERVICES The City of Hermosa Beach has upwards of 7,000 parcels of land in the Street Lighting District and approximately 15 Benefit areas. At this time, we have made a preliminary study to assess the possible need for the said service and discovered that more than 1,200 parcels of land should be re-evaluated and that another 1,000 parcels require Benefit Area changes. This study revealed that said changes were due to the increased activity in construction building and the changes in land use which have taken place. Each year this office includes many changes which reflect only the County parcel splits and segregations. However, in order to bring all property parcels into equity, it is necessary to evaluate all the areas as they relate to the Lighting intensity changes and other factors. In addition, in this vein, there are many areas where undergrounding and light changes are taking place and which the need for benefit area modifica- tions is included in the overall plan of upgrading. It is proposed that this Re -Evaluation Service will serve in this matter for the next, possibly ten, years. ADDENDA - It is proposed that the present 12 Benefit Areas may be reduced to the number of 6 Benefit Areas. -3- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PROPOSED SCHEDULE 1. INITIATE SERVICES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE (FOR 1988-1989 FISCAL YEAR). 2. REVIEW FIRST REVISED INFORMATION WITH THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, ON OR ABOUT March 1, 1988 OR SOONER IF POSSIBLE. 3. INTEGRATE ALL INFORMATION INTO HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT DATABASE BY March 11,1988 4. PRINTOUT SAMPLE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR VERIFICATION OF INFORMATION BY April 14,1988. 5. VERIFY THAT SAID PRINTOUT HAS THE DATA THAT IS TO BE ENTERED. BY April 14, 1988 6. VERIFY THAT NEW INFORMATION IS ON THE MAGNETIC TAPE THAT WILL BE DELIVERED TO THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY AUDITOR BY JUNE 30, 1988. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING RE-EVALUATION PROPOSAL PRELIMINARY STUDY BY P.N.ROSSETTI. ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES This study was our own review of this matter to ascertain if a Re -Evaluation Program was necessary at this time, the results are as follows; 1. Number of parcels to be re-evaluated approx. 7,000. 2. Number of Benefit Areas to be reviewed approx. 15. 3. The total amount of Assessable Front Feet in the District, in all Benefit Areas approx. 236,000. 4. The 15 benefit areas can be reduced to approx. 7 or 8. 5. The change in assessable F.F. is upwards of 34,000. 6. Approx. 1,125 parcels need modification due to changes in land use, resulting in a pickup of A.F.F. This will result in a slight reduction in the existing rates for the entire district. Recommendation: • That the city consider ordering this complete Re -Evaluation performed immediately and that it be done to incorporate it into the computerization program now in progress. If done at present it will result in a lower fee for said services. • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, January 26, 1988 at the hour of 7:43 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams Absent: Mayor Simpson (excused absence) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember June Williams ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams Absent: Mayor Simpson (excused absence) PROCLAMATION: American History Month, February, 1988 - accepted by Councilmember June Williams on behalf of the Daughters of the American Revolution INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES: Nancy Cook, Police Officer Michele Derks, Police Officer Bonnie Kendall, Police Officer CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve Consent Calendar items (a) through (dd) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for further discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (r) Sheldon, (s) Sheldon, (u) Williams, (v) Creighton, (aa) Sheldon, (bb) Sheldon and (dd) Williams, and on item 1.(b) noting a correction to page 11, item 9(c) from meeting with the City Council to meeting with the Planning Commission. Motion Williams, second Sheldon. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. (a) Approval of cil held on Action: Minutes: Special meeting of the City Coun- January 6, 1988. To approve minutes. (b) Approval of cil held on Action: Minutes: Regular meeting of the City Coun- January 12, 1988. To approve minutes with correction. Minutes 1-26-88 1Qi • (c) Demands and Warrants: January 26, 1988. Action: To approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 25127, 25129 and 25280 through 25430 inclusive noting voided Warrants Nos. 25283, 25284, 25285 and 25307. (d) Tentative Future Agenda Items. Action: To receive and file. (e) Building and Safety Department Monthly Activity Report: December, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (f) Community Resources Department Monthly Activity Report: December, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (g) Finance Department Monthly Activity Report: December, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (h) Fire Department Monthly Activity Report: December, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (i) General Services Department Monthly Activity Report: December, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (j) Personnel Department Monthly Activity Report: December, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (k) Planning Department Monthly Activity Report: December, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (1) Police Department Monthly Activity Report: December, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (m) Public Works Department Monthly Activity Report: December, 1987. Action: To receive and file. - 2 - Minutes 1-26-88 4 (n) Monthly Revenue Report: December, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (o) Monthly Expenditure Report: December, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (p) City Treasurer's Report: December, 1987. Action: To receive and file. (q) Sand and Strand Run - Parking Waiver. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated January 15, 1988. (r) (s) (t) Action: To waive the parking fees and parking enforcement of Hermosa Avenue between 6th and 16th Streets during the Sand and Strand Run on Sunday, February 7, 1988, between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and noon. Graffiti. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated January 15, 1988. Action: The City Council commended Public Works Director Antich for his department's efforts in addressing the graffiti problem whenever it occurs in the City. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. Pro Volleyball Beach Tournament Policy. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated January 15, 1988. Action: That City Council adopt the Pro Volleyball Beach Tournament Policy as the City's operating policy for handling such events amended as follows: (1) Page 1 Police Officers, addition of "or as many as deemed necessary by the Public Safety Director or his designee.", (2) Page 2 Trash Cans, addition of "or as deemed necessary by staff.", (3) Page 4 Misc. addition of "Must comply with City Ordinances regarding noise, etc." Standards should be stated and addressed. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Planning Commission Policy statement re. expiration of condominium conditional use permits. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 19, 1988. Action: To approve Planning Commission Policy Statement 87-2 allowing a 1-1/2 year time frame for execution of a C.U.P. in conjunction with a vesting map. 3 Minutes 1-26-88 (u) (v) (w) (x) (y) Report re. issuance of Alcohol Beverage Licenses prior to Conditional Use Permit approval by City. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated January 18, 1988. Action: To receive and file, and direct the Planning Director to prepare a report to City Council regarding the three businesses that got their ABC licenses without complying with Hermosa Beach requirements. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. Cable TV Board meeting summary and resignation of two board members. Memorandum from General Services Direc- tor Joan Noon dated January 19, 1988. Action: To 1) receive and file report, and 2) accept the resignations of Cable TV Board members Susan Hay and Barbara Jean Holland, effective January 18, 1988. Also to approve Board request to not fill those vacancies, thereby having a Board consisting of only 10 members, and direct the City Attorney to write a memo to the Chairman stressing the importance of strictly complying with Robert's Rules of Order and Quorum Rules. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. Award of Bid for lease/purchase of computer and com- munications equipment for dispatch and records. Memo- randum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dat- ed January 19, 1988. Action: To 1) authorize City Manager to enter into lease agreement with Security Pacific Merchant Bank of Los Angeles for the lease/purchase of computer and com- munications equipment and software necessary for dis- patch and records management; 2) authorize purchase of equipment from the. responsible vendors meeting all re- quirements of the requests for proposal; and 3) au- thorize staff to issue change orders and negotiate with vendors as necessary. Preliminary Design Approval for Council Chambers/Foyer Area (CIP 87-602). Memorandum from Public Works Direc- tor Anthony Antich dated January 18, 1988. Action: To not authorize Joncich, Sturm & Associates to proceed with final design for the Council Chambers/Foyer area renovation. Child Abuse Monthly Report. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated January 18, 1988. Action: To receive and file. - 4 - Minutes 1-26-88 (z) Agreement for inspection and administration services for Beach Drive improvements. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 18, 1988. Action: To 1) authorize Mayor to sign agreement with BSI Consultants, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $24,745, and 2) authorize staff to issue change orders as necessary. (aa) Award of Bid for Pier Grounding System (CIP 85-203). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 18, 1988. Action: To continue this item to the next meeting. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. (bb) Award of Bid for leasing various city vehicles: engine analyzer, street sweeper, paint truck. (Continued from January 12, 1988 meeting.) Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 19, 1988. Action: To 1) authorize the City Manager to enter into a lease agreement for the following city vehicles: a. Bear, Inc. BAR (Bureau of Automotive Repair) 80 Engine Analyzer b. Haaker Equipment Company "Elgin" street sweeper c. Highway Marking Systems - paint and sign truck 2) Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. 3) Authorize staff to re -advertise for bids for one utility van for the Community Resources Department. 4) Approve the following budget transfers: a. Return $21,000 to the Street Lighting Fund fund balance. b. Return $14,664 to the General Fund fund balance. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered noting a NO vote by Williams and absence of Mayor Simpson. (cc) City Reimbursement for Fire Protection Measures for Sin- gle Family Residences. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated January 20, 1988. Supplemental information - memorandum from Finance Administrator Viki Copeland dated January 25, 1988. Action: To receive and file. (dd) Approval of grading plan revision to accommodate street improvements at 532, 534-540 20th Street. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated January 15, 1988. 5 - Minutes 1-26-88 Speaking to Council in opposition to the recommended action was Pat Quigley, 1927 Valley Park. Action: To direct the Public Works Director to meet with the engineers for the developer and county to ap- prove corrections assuming that the grading plan meets all the necessary engineering requirements, the plan to be referred back to City Council for final approval after review by the City Attorney. Motion Williams, second Creighton. So ordered. CITIZENS ADDRESSING CONSENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Jerry Cohen, Westwood Music, spoke on item 2(b), requesting no limitations on hours of operation, or as an alternative, limit hours Monday through Thursday to 10:00 P.M., other evenings and holiday months until 11:00 P.M. MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING Action: To waive full reading of any ordinance or resolution on this evening's agenda. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Rosenberger NOES - None ABSENT - Mayor Simpson 2. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a ORDINANCE NO. 88-915 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM R- 2, C -POTENTIAL TO C-3 AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 720 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. For adoption. Action: To bring this Ordinance back for adoption in 30 days. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. (b) RESOLUTION 88-5099 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OF A PRECISE PLAN FOR 720 - 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. Resubmit- tal for approval as to form. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated January 19, 1988. Action: To approve Resolution No. 88-5099 as resubmit- ted noting a change on page 1, line 24, "approval of CUP" should read "approval of Precise Plan". Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. - 6 - Minutes 1-26-88 (c) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO CIRCULATE INITIATIVE PETITION WITH THE CITY. For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated January 19, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5101 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO CIRCULATE INITIATIVE PETITION WITH THE CITY" ($200.00). Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson (d) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 86-4818, WHICH ESTABLISHED PROCEDURES FOR A SELF-INSURED LIABILITY PRO- GRAM. For adoption. Memorandum from Risk Manager Rob ert Blackwood dated January 18, 1988. To 4.- Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5102 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 86-4818, WHICH ESTABLISHED PROCEDURES FOR A SELF-INSURED LIABILITY PROGRAM." Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered noting a NO vote by Williams and absence of Mayor Simpson. (e) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE PROCEDURES FOR MERGING LOTS UNDER SECTIONS 29.5-19 THROUGH 29.5-28 OF THE HER- MOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. For adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 18, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5103 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE PROCEDURES FOR MERGING LOTS UNDER SECTIONS 29.5-19 THROUGH 29.5-28 OF THE HER- MOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. (f) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RESOLUTION NO. N.S. 2435, AS AMENDED BY ADDING THERETO A LOADING ZONE RESTRICTION ON A CERTAIN SECTION OF VALLEY DRIVE AS HEREIN DESCRIBED. For adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 18, 1988. Action:. To adopt Resolution No. 88-5104 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RESOLUTION NO. N.S. - 7 - Minutes 1-26-88 2435, AS AMENDED BY ADDING THERETO A LOADING ZONE RESTRICTION ON A CERTAIN SECTION OF VALLEY DRIVE AS HEREIN DESCRIBED." Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Consent Calendar items (r), (s), (u), (v), (aa), (bb), and (dd) were discussed at this time but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Letter from Rosamond Fogg, Chairperson, OSPAC, 610 Sixth Street, Hermosa Beach, dated January 8, 1988 re. ballot measure earmarking 4% increased U.U.T. toward purchase of railroad right-of-way. Action: Refer to staff and City Attorney for report back to Council. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. So ordered. (b) Letter from Rod Merl, 485 - 25th Street, Hermosa Beach, dated January 11, 1988 re. zoning and general plan changes in area between Pacific Coast Hwy. and Ardmore, from llth Street to 6th Street. (c) (d) Action: To receive and file this letter. Motion Williams, second Sheldon. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. Final Action: To cancel the Public Hearing notices and table action on Resolution of Intention No. 87-5081 to study this area. Motion Williams, second Sheldon. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Williams NOES - Rosenberger ABSENCE - Mayor Simpson Letter from Frances Parker, 521-1/2 Loma Drive, Hermosa Beach, re. light and noise problems from new condos at 446 Monterey Blvd. Action: To refer the letter to staff for investigation and reply. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. Letter. from Chamber of Commerce President Jerry Compton, dated January 19, 1988 re. Hermosa Beach Chamber's goal setting meeting and activities and accomplishments over the past years. Minutes 1-26-88 Speaking to Council was Chamber of Commerce President Jerry Compton who presented Council with a Chamber of Commerce Membership Directory. Action: To receive and file. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. A recess was called at 9:00 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:11 P.M. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR ATCHI- SON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY CO.'S PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUEST FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH CITY LIMITS, AND ARDMORE AVENUE AND VALLEY DRIVE ON THE EAST AND WEST RESPECTIVELY. Memorandum from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated January 19, 1988. Supplemen- tal information - memorandum from Turrini and Brink dat- ed January 22, 1988. The staff report was presented by Assistant Planner An- drew Perea. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: In favor: Frank Greco, Turrini & Brink, 1920 E. 17th Street, Santa Ana Brian Webber representing AT&SF, 2 North Lake Avenue, Pasadena In opposition: Rosamond Fogg, 610 Sixth Street Action: To continue this Public Hearing to February 23, 1988. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. IMPROVEMENT TO WALKWAYS ACROSS AT&SF RAILROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY AT 21ST & VALLEY AND 16TH & VALLEY. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated January 5, 1988. The staff report was presented by City Attorney Lough. Action: To authorize the City Attorney to send a letter to AT&SF regarding the proposed improvements to 9 Minutes 1-26-88 pedestrian walkways at 16th Street and Valley Drive and 21st Street and Valley Drive, City of Hermosa Beach. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. 7. PROPOSED RESOLUTION TO REVISE TRUCK ROUTE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 19, 1988. The staff report was presented by Public Works Director Antich. Action: To add to the truck route Valley Drive (south- bound only) from Pier Avenue to Herondo Street and adopt Resolution No. 88-5105 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO ADD VALLEY DRIVE (SOUTHBOUND ONLY) FROM PIER AVENUE TO HERONDO STREET TO THE TRUCK ROUTE ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION NO. 86-4999." Motion Williams, second Creighton. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) (b) Discussion of City Council Goals. Memorandum from Act- ing City Manager Alana Mastrian dated January 20, 1988. Action: Review list of goals, submit any new goals you want to pursue, and direct new City Manager to develop a plan of action for achieving the high priority goals. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. Future Planning Commission/City Council Joint Meeting. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 20, 1988. Action: To 1) discuss items the City Council would like to discuss at a future Planning Commission/City Council Joint meeting; and 2) staff to establish a date for a joint workshop meeting between the Planning Commission and City Council after February 22, 1988. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Councilmember Creighton for discussion of a ballot measure for two -unit limit in R-2 zone. Action: To refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda. - 10 - Minutes 1-26-88 (b) Motion Rosenberger, second Williams. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. Request by Councilmember Williams for discussion of Sale of the Biltmore Site Councilwoman Williams asked that selling the Biltmore Site be agendized for the next meeting. The City Clerk was requested to prepare an election calendar for pos- sible ballot measures for the June 1988 election. Mayor Pro Tem Rosenberger referred this matter to staff for discussion at the next meeting and an election calendar. South Bay Cities Association Meeting - Councilmember Williams - Councilmember Williams was requested by the South Bay Cities Association to poll the Council for their feelings on the matter of the proposed resolution regarding the exchange of Proposition A funds for Southern California Rapid Transit District Fare Box Revenues. - City of Hermosa Beach has no available Prop- osition A funds. Beach Cities for a Coalition of a Drug -Free Youth - Councilmember Williams - A letter will be forthcoming asking local Cities to send a representative to this group - Councilmember Williams volunteered to represent the City of Hermosa Beach. Parking Enforcement Policies - Councilmember Williams - Has been informed by citizens that parking over the sidewalk is only enforced on a complaint basis. She would like the enforcement policy to read that while investigating a complaint, the parking enforcement peo- ple should cite all observed violations in the vicinity, to and from answering the complaint. - Referred to General Services Director Joan Noon for response. APPEARANCE OF INTERESTED CITIZENS None ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, January 26, 1988 at the hour of 10:47 P.M. to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, February 9, 1988 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Deputy City Clerk Minutes 1-26-88 MOTION: I MOVE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE A BALLOT PROPOSITION FOR AN INITIATIVE MEASURE. THE MEASURE WOULD SEEK ELECTORATE APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL FOR EITHER SALE OF, OR LAND TRADE OF, THE )ILTM©RE SITS. (SUBJECT TO GOVT. CODE AND TO INCLUDE AN M.A.I. APPRAISAL). THE SALE OR LAND TRADE WOULD BE SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACQUISITION OF THE ABANDONED RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR PARKLAND AND OPEN SPACE USES. will come back as a proposed ordinance --further action -- direction to City Clerk to prepare appropriate resolutions for adoption --to call election. see consent calendar 11 4I; , • 1t 14 14 / Cliff OF HERMOsA BEACH FINANCE-8FA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0001 ' TIME 11:23:03 FOR 02/09/88 DATE 02/04/88 : PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * ° DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 8 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP , ° 10 H CALBO ABM 02101 001-400-4201-4317 00016 *185.00 00192 25434 • •' • =._ ° 1 /60NFEREME E WEN15t s0.0W 02/03/1545 11 *4* VENDOR TOTAL ****4N******** 11********* *195.00 115 H VIKI *COPELAND 00041 001-400-1202-4316 00172 *479.53 05132 25432 RtG/BOOKS/SPRING SEM. 01/s7/061Faw►NGE AVAIN /TRALNIN0 s0. 00 0Z/0J/1545 ro 11 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******* ************************** *** *479.53 i. r, H INTERNATIONAL CONE OF BUILDING 00667 001-400-4201-4316 00096 *255.00 04916 25435 REQ c-, = - - - - , BUILDING— / IRAININo s0. 00 OZ/0J/1545 ,, '' *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************$*** *s************* ************* *255.00 11 , I H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00178 *72.694.37 25431 ;; REITksn'ENI/DEC 97 01/26/4515 RtrrRtntNr /RETIRtntrT s0. 00 02/03/15451, H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00179 *71.444.50CR 25431 0 RET a , ,' = • 1- _,= REI u.ctr1ENr /RET ARt111ENT" 50. 00 02/03/1515 0 u H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00180 *563.67 25431 RETIREMENT ADJ/DEC 87 01/26/88 RtrIREMENI /I ETIREntrT su. 00 OR/o3/8841 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00062 *873.83 25431 ., -RETIREMENT/DEC 87 01/26/88 81RtsT LLWIIILNO /RETIREnENT .0.00 02/0318s. 1• L- H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 8Y8. 00026 110-400-3301-4180 00062 *226.44 25431 61 RETI _ = a 1 = /RETIntrENT *0. 00 02/03/911 1 ,1 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00062 *4.955.76 25431 RETIREMENT/DEC-ST 01/26/88 PARKINQENF— FI ETIREnENr s0. u0 Vi/u3/eRs 0 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 115-400-3101-4180 00035 *904.36 25431 w RETIREMENT/DEG 87 01/26/88 ntI/IANB �/� �V. OO O2/O3/VO 0 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 115-400-3104-4180 00035 *652.84 25431 °' RETIREMENT/DEC-87 01/26/88 TsarC BAFtIY /REI aItnENi so. VV 0. /03r 4 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 145-400-3401-4180 00035 *118.94 25431 w RETIREMENT/DEC-87 01/20/Sb DLAI,. A RALE /Kt1amsnmp41 sV. VV V4/V3/1515 °. ro 1 ,1 n 1. 41. to, 1. ...r 1. .. :.q..,., .� c21111014.4.a • 011 Y V W u W • • • • • • • V. Cir.( OF HERnusA ■EACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 00022 TIME 11:23:03 FOR 02/09/88 DATE 02/04/88 ; ` s PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * ° DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 145-400-3402-4180 00035 •142.19 25431 - R , - . a :: EEEA 7RETIREMtNT so. oo OZ/03/69 " 14 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 145-400-3407-4180 00004 *37.15 25431 1, RET a is a = . - _ _ 1 - '1: : • a /KtTIRtMENr 00. 00 02/03/139 v H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00033 *92.01 25431 ;o RtIIkEMENT/DEG 87 O1/26/d8 CROSBINV GUARD /KtrIREMENI so. 00 OZ/03/ee�. 77 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00034 *563.67CR 2543112 RETI u1/1a/ WARD ,REIIREAENT $0. VO 02,03/de*" M H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00062 *856.02 25431 n RET ,. . - • - _ = = a^ a = '-ATN- ,REI IREMENT s0. v0 02/03/bo a. >o *s* VENDOR TOTAL *****e**s*ss**s*******sss a. ** ss**sss**s**s*sss *10.109.41 n . a. es* PAY CODE TOTAL **s****** *11.028.94 u M a. R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES. INC. 00138 001-400-2101-4309 00117 *172.24 0001225440 '° — ---— 0V UMISC-CHGS/JAN 88 01/31/88 POLICt /RAIN;ENANCE rAuEK1AL8 su. FUdld6 41 0 "' sss VENDOR TOTAL. ss****sw *sss *172.24 45 .. R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 00447 *143.00 00013 25441 --- - ----- _ ---MIST CMGSTJAN 88 01 /31188 POLILE--7PRlbuntLN I tNANs.t su. ud ud/u3AMF •• . w ss* VENDOR TOTAL sss sssssss*•rsswsssssssssssssssssssss s *143.00 ;: as • N R ANASTASI CONSTRUCTION 00004 001-210-0000-2110 01963 *750.00 26333 05059 25442 - . ! • • • I ' I_,C K K . :: /DtrOsI I S/MURK V VARAN I Et *u.o0 0a/ua/tsa a7 a. s*s VENDOR TOTAL *************sss*** s*******sss *750.00 ;; .I R SCOTT*ANDERSON 01585 001-210-0000-2110 01960 *750.00 26337 05055 25443 WOR GUAR REHUND 26331 ul/a//dd /U rUbITd/WUKK WUANANItE s0. U0 Ua/UJOdb .s .. *** VENDOR TOTAL *******s ***s****s*s***** *s*ss***s***s**s* *750.00 ; w PO R ARTISTIC 02029 001-400-2101-4187 00159 *530.37 3494 04670 25444 ;, -SUMMER7WINTER' /20/88 POLICE /UNI I,- 1 4 r ' • - 4 :': n r. n n W 0 •• • • • .• FINANCE-SFA340 TIMIE 11:23:03 CITY OF HERMOBA BEACk DEMAND LIST I/6 PAGE 0003 FOR 02/09/88 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP •*• VENDOR TOTAL u+ u***.u**************************** * $530.37 R ASL ENGINEERING _-. ENGRG SERV/UEC 8/ 00244 160-400-8402-4201 00048 $5.522.21 9876 05421 25445 YU/6 U1/11/!!/ {:IP W2 -4U1 /LUNIHACf SERVICE/PRIVAT 90.00 OZ/03188 *** VENDOR TOTAL **** **********••••••••*******•w•••Wi••+I•w*********** ************• $5.522.21 R ASTD DUES El 6 02115 001-400-2101-4315 00087 $100.00 6i /MEhuERsnsr *** VENDOR TOTAL *****•*****+I***************• $100.00 05522 25446 90.00 OZ/O3/138 R AUTOMOTIVE PAINT CENTER MISC'CHOS/JAN 88 01891 115-400-3104-4309 00494 01/31/88 $187.23 TRAFFac SAFEIY /MAINIENANCE RAIERIA *** VENDOR TOTAL ******•*•••******•***•***•***•****** **•**••*****•*•**********•**••• $187.23 00153 25447 90.00 OU/OUPSO 1 6 6 11 11 16 I1 ,6 D 16 11 16 3? n m 11 11 1. 32 N 3? A R BENDER & ASSOCIATES 02118 001-400-4201-4316 00099 $149.00 04912 25448 --SEMINAR/ NSCHEC 01/0/08 BVLLDaNO / IRAININO s0. VU WE/ 0.11/1:11:1 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL *************************••*•*** *s***•***•********•• $149.00 R ROBERT*BLACKWOOD 00366 001-400-1203-4317 00024 $100.00 TR195 00195 25449 -..---------PER DIEM/EMP REL INS1 IR195 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************** PCRtuUNNEL R.uNFERENI:E EIIPENSE $100.00 90. u0 R BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 00005 001-400-1208-4305 00442 - - MISC-CAOSI-JAN-88 01/s1788 $689.13 ANNNOP' -/OFFICE- *** VENDOR TOTAL **********•********•******•*******•••*** **********N. $689.13 .1 43 N 42 .6 .r OZ/041/e1e .. w 11 11 11 00126 25450 1. 1• 24 UW/UJ/WW 61 1. 0 61 R GERRY L.*BRINDLEY 02117 110-300-0000-3302 18722 $46.00 563031 05222 25451 6 ; -CITE-PAYMENT-REFUND--63031---01/18/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL /cOURI FINEB/PARRING sO. u0 02/03/813' 6. $46.00 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER -----..-----PETTY-CA8H/ AN 11-T0731 02016 001-400-1101-4305 00150 $14.87 01/31788 Cnv COVNCIC7OFFICE OPER 8UPPLIEs 6a 6? p .. n 05064 25452 -50 00- 0z/03/ss n 11" 1.9 ,. I:'• 11 , 17 j ,. 11 11 • .9 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME: 11:23:03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/09/88 '4 PACE 0004 1 DATE 02/04/88 ; PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER ---PETTY'CASH/AN-I5-TQ 3t R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER -P6lTY-CASH»fib 1 u 31 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PEii( CASH/JAN I5 TO 31 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1121-4316 00010 01/31/88 *50. 00 CI1Y ULERR--7TRATNINO 02016 001-400-1202-4305 00131 01/31/88 FINANCE ADN1N 02016 001-400-1203-4305 00132 01/31/86 PERtiON t -L *7. 27 /UFFLGE OPER 90PPLLEU *10. 75 05064 25452 $0700- 02103E 05064 25452 50.00 Oz/04/99 05064 25452 02016 001-400-1205-4317 00022 R GARY*BRUTBCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JAN 15 TO 31 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JAN 15 TO 41 •1: • 02016 001-400-2101-4187 00160 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER --PETTY--CASH1JAN-1 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CABH/aAN-i5 l u 41 OI 31/88 ruLIGE 02016 001-400-2101-4305 00599 01/31/86 NULICE 02016 001-400-2101-4316 00180 fur -ICE OrER SUPPLi *10. 00 /CONFERtNc.E ExPENBE *19. 17 /uNIruKm ALLUWAN%E *6. 53 V0.00 0Z/03/99 05064 25452 furrIGt urww burr'LItB *71. 48 50.00 05064 25452 U. 00 u1/04/9B 05064 25452 *O. uO 0Z/03/98 05064 25452 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER ---'--.--PETTY-CASH,'JAN-15 TII 3T R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY C'_' R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER - PETTY-CASH/JAN-1 S -TO -3I 02016 001-400-2201-4305 00155 OI/41/9tl *7. 59 02016 001-400-2201-4311 00183 ammo IRE 02016 001-400-4101-4305 00165 01/31/88 LAPINI 02016 001-400-6101-4316 00013 /UPF 14t UMW burPLitt( *23.96 /AUIU NAINIENANGE *50. 00 /UFFIGE urER 9uwPLIEB *2.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL *************** 02016 115-400-3104-4316 00012 *20.00 0I /31 /bel TRArrIG SAFETY 1TRAININO *293.62 05064 25452 50. v0 vz/03/8B 05064 25452 *V. VU U1/V4/!Ib 05064 25452 *0. Vu va/04/ue 05064 25452 *0.00 U1/03/98 05064 25452 *0.0u Oa/03/89 R BSI CONSULTANTS. INC. PLANCK SERV7BLDO 00630 001-400-4201-4201 00082 *650.00 53352 04913 25453 O1 Vl/V0/C{H HV ILII INV /16,uNTRAG r t RVIGt/rR IVA r *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************o►w *S*********4rw* R W. ROBERT*BUCHINSKY -.-THEATRE TECH/JAN-12= 6 • *650.00 50.00 OZ/03/915 02116 001-400-4601-4201 00159 *165.00 01718788-COMM-RESOURCE8-7CONTRACT" SERVICk/rp avA 04825 25454 *V.-00 02/u3/8b 5 • 0 V N 19 I0 If 11 I0 20 11 17 77 N 15 19 • 311 32 N 05 11 1. 19 J til 60 6.0 40 91 .101 44 a O .r • 0. 11 71 11 9. 79 60 61 61 03 N 65 66 a Y 69 10 71 11 71 19 77 76 a..I • wti,�;�L1 Jar U .• M.r1.'M,,4,1� :. 7 . 1 ., ... 114 0. 11 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 11:23:03 a r r ur NENrI08A U A I1 DEMAND LIST FOR 02/09/88 PAOE 0005 DATE 02/04/88 - r- PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL * ** ********* **_******** $165.00 R C. P. P. A. RENEWAL. --DUESt6 �. a - - 00818 110-400-3302-4315 00019 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******* ** • a •, *140. 00 /ntnBERSHLP 05231 25455 *140.00 50.00 01703/68 R CA ASSOC OF POLICE TRNO OFCRS 02119 001-400-2101-4315 00088 — - ---DUE877i ALTF01/21/88 POLu.t /ntnutNikur $28.50 *** VENDOR TOTAL **+►*+r*** 04686 25456 *28. 50 iu.0O 02/03/68 R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. INC. 00599 001-400-6101-4201 00088 *7.263.33 --- ----- --PARKS PNOW Ft.UNIRAI:I 8trtvaLt/I+kLvAr *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************** 107.263.33 8010066 05411 25457 SO. 04.1 02/03/68 R CA STATE ASSOC OF LOCAL ELEC - --DUES t rr -MI DSTOKKE- 00785 001-400-1121-4315 00034 of/ 588 CITY uax10K *40.00 nEnBER8HIP 04524 25458 *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************w*r** * * *_* $40.00 50.00 01/0J/66 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE -- WATER-SERV7JAN 88 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE —WATER SERV/JAN 88 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER SERVWJAN-88 *** VENDOR TOTAL 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00198 01/31/88 BLuO PAINT 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00177 01/41/88 PARKS 00016 115-400-3101-4303 00135 01/31/ ntuIANb *367. 74 ILITIEE 05142 25459 $634.94 /tUTIL1TIES *1.466. 31 FUrICITIES ************ ************** ********** *2.468.99 w. uo 1 — 6 r o 10 11 11 IS 14 19 16 1. 16 16 10 rr 16 11 27 16 21 16 29 30 61 32 33 34 .9 n U u 66 40 tt 11 16 44 43 414 54. 4101. 54. a U — u 02/ujs,SU 1+ a 05142 25459 31 50. 00 02/u.ss8tf » 05142 25459 36 50.00 02/03/68 R CALPELRA --DUES/R. BCA ' ,6,. 1 01616 001-400-1203-4315 00018 *95. 00 04462 25460 .I I.. IMENHkK6HIP *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************** *95. 00 02/03/96 it R CENTER STATIONERS — MISC--CHOSYDEC-87 00265 001-400-2101-4305 $98.98 PUL1 Ct Farr at.k arts uverLiku 01251 25461 10. UU U1/03/68 6r 3' 39 60 Si.1111, 91 . 63 1./' 69 66 67 66 0 to 11 72 23 11 • 1 • • 1 45 .. .6 44 1. FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:23:03 CITY OF rruSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/09/88 PAGE 0006 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO M AMOUNT UNENC DAT R CENTER STATIONERS MISG CHCS/JAN 88 *** VENDOR TOTAL **** 00265 001-400-2101-4305 00601 01/31/88 POLICE $50.94 /Or,IGt UrtR SUrrLLtb $149.92 CHK N E EXP 9 m 11 13 N 16 /6 17 u m 25462 ° 00151 25461 50. 00 041/03/130041/03/130 R CENTRAL BANK LEASING LEASE PMT/FEB 88 *4* VENDOR TOTAL 01226 001-400-2101-6900 00262 01/31/88 1 $1.978. 59 /LEASE rAYrtNIS 11111•11414HHHH1* 00024 $1. 978. 59 CHAMPION CHEVROLET • 00014 001-400-4201-4311 00097 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET - -. --MISC-CMOS/JAN 88 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISG GHG8/JAN 88 CHAMP ION CHEVROLET MI 00014 DI 00014 011J1/b8 001-400-4204-4311 00073 001-400-4601-4311 00041 $9.50 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *150. 66 10. UU 0d/U.S/ 2232 223 226 226 n 00019 25463 $9.50 COMM NEs17uRCEb /AU10 NAINItNANIE 00014 110-400-3302-4311 00320 01/41/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************* **** I* *19.00 PARKING SNF /AUTO MAINItNANCt 10.00 3/ 29 )9 00019 25463 ;; su. oO 01/u3'Wu 00019 25463 50. vu 02/u.1/we 00019 25463 $188.66 sv. ou u:t/03/wm R CHRISTEVE CORP. SANITARY -SEWER --REP. 01852 160-400-8402-4201 00049 02/U1 /ba $26.019.74 132 8-407 7CONTRACT SemvIt.ElrRAvAr *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************IHNIHN*************1F*******INHIIHHHH14. $26.019.74 05422 25464 *0.00 uz/v3/ess R COMPASS ENGINEERING CO.. INC. PUBLIC -NOTICES/ZONE--CHC 343. 02120 O 1 /2T/88 001-400-4101-4305 00164 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************ * $1. 079. 44 lbt urtK WurrLiES $1.079.44 3437 03579 25465 su.00 Ow/OJ/e8 R CSULB FOUNDATION —REO R CSULB FOUNDATION RtV FEE/A:-7KNTICFt 00349 001-400-1202-4316 00173 01/d87ens $114.75 FINANat forum /TRAININv 00349 001-400-4202-4316 00093 01/z8/8b $114.75 05143 25466 sv.00 Oz/va/ea 03143 25466 PVN WKS ADMIN /I$AININ0 10.00 0Z/00/56 • • ti 3. 30w 61 u U 44 45 .a 47 44 49 f9 61 12 63 66 66 6/ ,6 60 61 62 66 03 66 u 60re n n 73 16 n 0 • • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:23:03 C I 1 t OF HftNn08A ■r_AuN DEMAND LIST FOR 02/09/88 14 PAGE 0007 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK N DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ********4414**** ******•*** *229.50 R DATA SAFE 00156 TAPE r3. UNIDEC i2 -JAN 11 ,5511 s 0 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************** 001-400-1206-4201 00330 • - - u z_= .- *93. 25 ACT 8ERVICE/PRIVAT *93. 25 35115 00047 25467 10.00 02/03/88 :6 it 44 R DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SERV 01857 001-400-2101-4251 00172 *1.036.68 5629/5668 00046 25468 AWWS/NOV-DEC 87— /5668 -_.01732/88— POLICE /CONTRACT-SERVICE/GOVT •** VENDOR TOTAL***************************w**************************************** *1.036.68 00267 105-400-2601-4251 00045 *393.74 J- _ R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 115-400-3104-4251 00040 *393.73 HIOMWA R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -----14/CHWAY- • Kra. *0:00 02703788 103364 05403 25469 •** VENDOR TOTAL •**************• ***** * • 1 • 16 _ 6'. 103364 05403 25469 *787.47 R DUN & BRADSTREET -------.SEM REO/HITE/TERCERO 00658 110-400-3302-4316 00097 *198.00 0T726, ***VENDOR TOTAL **** **.**w* PARKTNV'--7TRATRINO *198.00 05233 25470 *0. 00--02703/1515 R DUNN-EDWARDS PAINT CO. 00161 001-400-4204-4309 00828 .,--------- PAINT/COMM-CTR-------5736-Cr--01126/ 88 •' • I •� M Bum ',Aim' *368.70 /NALNrCNANuE NA1CR1AL15 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****•****************•*•*********•********•**********w*w*********** *368.70 140157360 05418 25471 13615. 70 6 08/03/tl6 a R JOHN*DUSENBERRY 30 SS ,• 02112 001-210-0000-2110 01950 *238.50 48982 05062 25472 -THEATRE DEPOSIT REFUND 48982 0I/d8/08 /UCrOSITS/WORk 0UARANTCC *0.00 02/v318841 *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************w *'*.******* *238.50 EASY READER CLERK TYrZbT AD 61 64 66 00181 001-400-1203-4201 00269 *25.88 COH-1WK 04460 25473 a H-iWK 01/21/815 PCM ICUNIRACU 15CRVICC/FR1VAT 10.00 01/03/WO 44 7' II n n r. 7! )6 rti7 4A:.:41. •.Xd..6�`L..o.. : . KC+.. >x'. zt[ash:6k)N�:'::1: 40 • • • • • 44 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:23:03 11 I1117'• •• DEMAND LIST FOR 02/09/88 PACE 0008 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO * CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL *** ******11 $25.88 R EKISTIC 01951 --- SERV/COM--TRANS-IMP PLAN 209-4 --017'1 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***** **** 145-400-3407-4201 00014 $17.505.08 LOMim sus slum, 7CONTR 1209-4 03580 25474 • *17.505.08 R FAMILY PRACTICE ASSOCIATES • EMP MED - 00054 001-400-1203-4320 00177 :MI' 1 - •a- *** VENDOR TOTAL **** ** I.. R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY RISC-CHGSTJAN-88 SONNEC— —7 $2.176.05 n 04465 25475 ;; 0002/03/88 7 I ■ ' la' • 1 00058 001-400-4204-4309 00829 01,..11/88 $2.176.05 $22.46 BLDG MINT /MAINTENANCE rATERIALB *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************a►** ********** *22.46 00118 50. u0 25476 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY -TELEPHONE -CHCSY88-- R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY ---- TELEPHONE-CHOWJAM-88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY T R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - TELEPHONE--CHOSTUAN-8B 00015 01/31/88 001-400-1101-4304 00146 $48.80 CITY COUNCIL 05145 6, u 6, 6. 25478 :n 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00138 0I131788 /88 a■ $23.93 HONE 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00088 $226.53 01/31/88 00015 CITY ATTuRNEY 001-400-1141-4304 00132 *17.54 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 TELEPHONE-CH0S>-JAN-88 -01/31/88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY N 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY N 88 •7''_'. 7 a 7 III' 001-400-1201-4304 00147 $77.98 LIT, --MANAGER 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00152 $33.39 /TELtrHONE 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00151 $36.31 •. - . . . . , =i= 05145 ♦U. 00 .6 25478 .. 02/03/8M-0 .6 05145 25478 0 48 $0.00 02/03r ,. 05145 25478 ;, $0 00-02703/tuI ,6 05145 25478 s0. uO 02,u3,813 „ 05145 25478 . 00 Oa/va/81r 0 05145 25478 l /dl ,Hl! PtMSUNNUI. / rtL .r 1urt 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00082 01/31/88 $188.74 IA PR11GtlsiNU ittLftONONE s,. Qu va/0-.assu 05145 25478 50. uO 0a/03s8ei .6 u M .6 N O „ ,1 72 ,. ,. R 34 G O O 0 • • A 4101 41111 dIP FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 11:23:03 CITY OF HEkMOBA BEACm DEMAND LIST FOR 02/09/88 PAGE 0009 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY CHOS/JAN 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY _—_-TELE HON! R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY ----TE1XP N 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00074 01,31/88 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE *29.04 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00217 01/31/88 POLICETTELEPHONE 05145 25478 *572.72 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00086 01741 FIRE *204.45 / TELtriiONE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00140 48.56 _V 1(31 /1A:f R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TEL a 6 '1 ANIIIAt. CONTROL. ITELEPHONE— 00015 001-400-2701-4304 00056 *4.20 OI /31/88 CIVIL-DtrEri /IELI:'MUNk 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00150 01 /ai /88 PLANNING 00015 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY -----TELEPHONE-C14081--JAN-138----- R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY --- -TELEPHONE--CHOSTJAN-88- GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY -TELEPHONE-CHOW-JAN _8g_.. R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY Z : 001-400-4201-4304 00151 muICDINw *94.17 / I ELt.e4 AVk s0. 00 O:c/ua/68 05145 25478 50.00-0 d'00/w 05145 25478 50.00 02/03/66 05145 25478 60.00 02/03/89 12 la IS 16 V 19 20 21 22 22 N M 05145 25478 5000 02703788" 29 >a 05145 25478 $103.36 50.00 02/02/me 05145 25478 00015 ----TELEPHONE- 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00153 01/31/88 00015 /TELEPHONE *226.22 Pus wpb ADMIN F1 .. rliuN6 001-400-4204-4321 00318 2 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY „ -- - - — TEc rhONE CMGS/ JAN -88 i.2 „ •4 92 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY --TELEPHONE"-CHOLI1 AN eB *me VENDOR TOTAL ********* N 50.00 02/03/86 05145 25478 *18.05 50.00 02/03/115 a1 31 33 U 35 36 a6 39 40 9 92 05145 02/1111 " 46 05145 25478 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00161 4233.17 01,31/88 -COMM RESOURCE8- 00015 001-400-6101-4304 OT731,88 00015 rARKS 110-400-3301-4304 00088 00071 *5.48 11 tLtrMUNt *11.21 00 25478 -5Q: 00 -027037 .9 05145 25478 50.00 Ud/0d/116 05145 25478 - 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00149 Ol/4l/BS PARKINV ENF *123.06 05145 25478 /TELEPHONE *2,286.91 50.00 02/03/88 GEORGE & AL'S AUTO TOP SHOP 01748 001-400-6101-4311 KT 20 ANK!! 00126 *75.00 /AUf0 MAINTENANCE 2010 04779 25479 579.66 02/03/116 62 a. 6 St 99 60 61 62 63 a 6a 64 N 49 ro n 22 n 74 n /6 4641, 4116 411116 111116 • • . Tor • .1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:23:03 CITY OF rim DEMAND LIST FOR 02/09/88 PAGE 0010 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROD * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL *75.00 R GLOBAL BUSINESS FURNITURE 02030 110-400-3302-4305 00355 *404.97 78003862 04171 25480 --- FURNITURE7BASE III 03861 ul/14/ *** VENDOR TOTAL **************** rAKKiNG ENF /UFI(.E Whir urrLs.b *404.97 5404.97 02/0I/138 R GRANT THORNTON ACCTO-SER • 00742 001-400-1202-4201 00117 *4.138.50 13251/1486/641 05135 25481 '11 n -• :,a' • *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************* w*w+r *****s**** *4.138.50 ,._ .6 . 6K R OTEL 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00162 EGUIF* RENT/.iAN 88 01/28/w *** VENDOR TOTAL **** ******** *90.66 05144 25482 Gunn RESWRGEs 11ELErHONE *90.66 50.00 0z/0a/U15 R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 02102 160-400-8405-4201 00009 *3.200.00 ENGRO SERV/DEC-87--------- 01--_-01714788 -4O5-- 7CONTRACT-SERVacE/rrcavA, *** VENDOR TOTAL. ** ***** *3.200.00 01 05419 25483 5u. uO 02/02/161 R HEDGER COMPANY 01121 001-400-2401-4311 00103 -REBUILD STEERING BOX 7076 01/.11/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************** *159. 75 ANIPAL CONTROL 7AUTO-MAINTrAANC *159. 75 7076 04785 25484 . /s—Um/u.s/ems R IN-TEK WRECKING. INC. WORK-OUAR--REFUND-- 26422 01778 001-210-0000-2110 01953 *350.00 01/ ***VENDOR TOTAL **************** /DEPOSITS Li • .,•3 . *350.00 26422 05052 25485 R INGLEWOOD TRANSMISSION .0 -- --- — -TR • *** VENDOR TOTAL *** 02095 001-400-2101-4311 00439 *958.50 3184 04698 25486 r :: *958.50 R INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE ----METER-USE/NOV/MAINT/FEB 00068 001-400-1208-4201 00406 *443.70 01715/88 WEN APPROP-___..--7CONTRACT bei(VauE/rRlVA, 05133 25487 10:00- 02/03/8w 6 I6 u 16 IS H 22 24 PI 2/ /6 a b 32 33 6. 66 36 d/ 66 6. 40 .I .J .6 N 66 M u .6 60 62 66 6. 6. 6/ 66 66 60 67 61 43 66 6/ N 66 /0 /1 72 n /6 /6 • • 411 • • • G 4.16 4414 444 4144 •� t 11 ,I0 1. •10 • • • • • 14 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:23:03 DEMAND LIST FOR 02/09/88 PAGE 0011 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO N CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP '1 R INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE 00068 001-400-4601-4305 00454 TYPEWRITER REPAIR *117. 50 7025267 04834 25487 •** VENDOR TOTAL + *****• ********** w l ►*w•►**** 1*1*1** S 7 c1.1- - *561.20 R INTERNATIONAL CONF OF BUILDING 00667 SEMINAR/P. CORNEAL 01/47/88 R INTERNATIONAL CONF OF BUILDING 00667 -01728/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL 001-400-4201-4316 00097 BUILDINv *255.00 04915 25488 001-400-4201-4316 00098 nufarIl 8 n NAINANO /TRAINI *255.00 *510. 00 .0.00 0z/o31/69 04917 25488 .00 oz/o3/ew R JORNA*JOHNSON 02111 - - - -- -- CLARK- BLDG -DEP -REFUND ----4899I- 01/28/88 001-210-0000-2110 01952 *** VENDOR TOTAL. *** *************s,l***** *75. 00 /1.r0SiIS/wORlc OunKANlftft *75.00 48991 05061 25489 *ti. UU UY/U3/1115 R KANE BALLMER & BERKMAN LEGAL- SERV/DEC-87 SUPP / 111 --*** VENDOR TOTAL 3 • • ..r 00130 001-400-1131-4201 01731788 00335 *6.425.00 Ll1Y A11UNNEV A&1 b VLCE7PRIVAT *6.425. 00 05148 25490 50.00---02703788 R ARAKEL*KAPRIELIAN 02109 TEMP -SIGN DEP-REFUND---48720- 01/28/ a** VENDOR TOTAL ******************** 001-210-0000-2110 01957 *250.00 48720 05048 25491 /ufteU 3I 113/wUNR VUANAN 1 EE *250.00 1110. UU UZ/03/156 R KAVANAUGH & WILLIAMS CONST. 01127 WORK -GUAR -REFUND- - —47959 -- 01728788- **• VENDOR TOTAL *****•** ***, 001-210-0000-2110 01956 *150.00 7DEPOSIT8/WORK-00ARA E *150.00 47959 05049 25492 *0.00 02/03/ww R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES �- - REO ADVANCE/RACKWOOD-TRI • 1 " 1116 1 t, 0 *•* VENDOR TOTAL **********w******** 00317 001-400-1203-4317 00026 7- :1 01 1 17 *120.00 CONFERENCE kArrxest TR195 00195 *120.00 5U. UU 25493 0 10 II 17 I. 16 11 7. 20 ,1 12 23 24 23 24 31 >o 10 ., 33 13 0, 6a 40 .1 ., .6 44 43 4. U S0 .I ., 33 34 16 66 6, 6. 60 61 6, a /� O f V its8- 66 R THOMAS*LIBBY - WORK GUAR --REFUND 02106 4173 01/27/88 001-210-0000-2110 01964 *150.00 4173 05060 25494 /UEPOSITS/WORK .00 UZ/v3/66 66 H u N 70 72 74 ,. w r 410 4$ r r r r r r 00 r NO FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 11:23:03 CI I r OF ,IEecnuBA BEACH DEMAND LIST „ • 4 PAGE 0012 FOR 02/09/88 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK M DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R THOMAS*LIBBY 02106 001-210-0000-2110 01965 4150.00 4173 05063 25494 -WORK-GUAR-REFUND /DUMPS! B7wutslc VUARANIEE su. UU OWFUJIMI ***VENDOR TOTAL ********11-******************************* *****11 $300.00 ., * * * R JEREMY*LOEB 02078 001-400-4601-4201 00158 460.00 --THEATRE-TEM/VAN-26=27 OT7287me VENDOR TOTAL **************************** 04821 Gunn KESOORGES 7cUNIRAG1 6ERV1Gt71911VAT 4V.00 460.00 25495 Ow/Quiet; R LOMITA LUMBER CO. 02094 001-400-6101-4309 00404 -------- LUMBER FOR PIER REPAIR 01/26/88 PARKS $209.59 /WAIN1tNANCE I7IALERIAL8 *** VENDOR TOTAL **** 4209.59 05409 25496 $2u9. s9 OR/03/OU R JAMES P.*L000H 00938 001-400-1131-4201 00334 47.002.00 05147 25497 RETAINER/JAN 88 01/31,88 C111 AI1OrlNtr 7GUN1KACT >ItMV111.tFP1tLVA1 WV.00 02,u3,0 ***VENDOR TOTAL ******************** *********w****************** 47.002.00 js I' .1 .0 I,. 1 10 • ,7 • 1, •'N R LOUIS THE TAILOR. INC. --------MISC CHGStJAN 88 00079 001-400-2101-4187 00161 *** VENDOR TOTAL * ** R M.J.C. PROPERTIES WORK -GUAR --REFUND i 422. 31 POLICE /uN1rOKM ALLOWANCE 01504 001-210-0000-2110 01954 422.31 4350.00 00126 25498 su.00 uY/03/tl1f 26430 05051 25499 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************* R MAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 1160-400-3102-4309 00254 4350.00 4112. 89 00127 25500 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************** ='7" 3- ' 7 /' 7 4112.89 '•. 6.6 R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 001-400-6101-4311 00127 P1ARK8 412. 01 /AUTOr-PIAfCE 00129 25501 • •II 17 11 I. •IS 16 '7 16 167 19 70 21 77 •23 24 27 77 0 27 :a 79 10 11 u 3' N 3, 17 36 3, .0 u 77 Q a .7 a .9 70 1. 17 Si 17 19 ao 61 61 61 $4 66 66 66 70 1 • • • • • • i• FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 11:23:03 DEMAND LIST FOR 02/09/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE 0013' DATE 02/04/88 ; VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF POM CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ' v DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ******** •12.01 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION MTSPURCH/DEC 87 00388 783-5 0 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******** ******1F 110-400-3302-4310 00053 $14.23 883-930-783-5 05137 25502 �. • 9,7N{_ 1.'11 • : a= *14.23 10 . 0 • 0 Y' 0 R MONARCH BROOM 00084 —MISC-CHQS1JAN-88 --01 /3I / *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************** 001-400-3103-4309 00560 41.618.26 /r1AINTENApCt NATtRIAL *1.618. 26 00130 9 10 17 10 19 10 91 11 25503 1„ 50. uu ORIU3/1513 19 • • Ii" I • R MOORE BUSINESS FORMS 00423 110-400-3302-4305 00356 4491.89 82349913 05204 25504 -- PK() PERMIT'RENEWAL-FORM•-49913 U1/aa/8d PANKaNO ENF /GFrIuE OPER-SUPPLa *** VENDOR TOTAL w*** ******* ******* 4491.89 19 21 2* 19 30 91 5460. RD OR/U3/1515 90 R MESON'S ELECTRONICS -.. — --THEATRE-ttQHT2N0- *** VENDOR TOTAL ******** R P.C. ELECTRIC —WORK -GUAR REFUND *** VENDOR TOTAL 79 01936 001-400-4601-4305 00453 11 1 - 11 02110 001-210-0000-2110 01955 4159.03 *59.03 *750. 00 99 99 *0 .1 204266 03789 25505 w uO Ot/Ua/ei15 91 91 43 47938 05050 N U 90 25506 /uErOBITS/WORK OiARANutt *750.00 R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 00321 001-400-2101-4304 00218 4138.30 ------- -01/31/86 .—POLTGt ntLEPn0rE *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************s 50. uu 01/u4/HFJ' .+ M 91 91 99 99 853527 00036 25507 *138. 30 50.00 04/U4/tl15r 91 90 110 01 01 03 44 115 00 41 9• 49 10 11 n /• n R PACIFIC EQUIP & IRRIGATION CUSHMAN-PARTS-- *** VENDOR TOTAL 00406 110-400-3302-4311 00319 $293.46 03486 25508 ,1 1 $293.46 =K PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 01556 001-400-2201-4187 00069 *44.55 86032-1 01174 25509 SNOUT--BOOT8/FIRE DEPT 032-1 01 ant /urtruI(M ALICE 544.33 UW/03/1119 J J J .+ V • • • 1 , FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:23:03 CITY OF wttrObA BrACm DEMAND LIST PAGE 0014 FOR 02/09/88 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL $44.55 'i. 3 10 IS 13 II R PEPSI -COLA BOTTLING COMPANY 00144 001-400-1208-4201 00407 $31.36 00031 25510 1' —VEND -}1A VI/dl/Sb fitt ArrKUr F UN11(AUT 6tKVIGt/PKIVAT 50.00 Oz/0!159 17 *** VENDOR TOTAL 111 $31.36 I. 30 31 33 R PITNEY BODS 00222 001-400-1208-4305 00441 $160.55 367777 05217 25511 73 -POSTAGE METER RESET 67777 01/16/88 GEN APPROP /OrFac.e -$0:00 ow/03/15e, *** VENDOR TOTAL $160.55 R POSTMASTER --- - -CITATION NOTICE POSTAGE 00097 110-400-3302-4305 00358 $2.000.00 52 05235 25512 02 PARKING PARKING ENr /Orr ICE OPtn burPLIES *O.uO Oz/Oa/b15 j *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************ 1******* ►**ww**** **** $2.000.00 r -- PURSUIT SPECIALTIES 01449 110-400-3302-4311 00318 $937.20 10469 04163 25513 PAKKirQ Ere /Av1O AAINTENANct CUSHMAN-tIGHT`8 *** VENDOR TOTAL **** $937.20 5937. zU UM/o3/8b R RADIO SHACK - - MISC CHOB/-JAN'_H8 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************** 44 f, 01429 001-400-1206-4309 00087 $88.71 --02131 / DATA rROCE88-ING--MA1NTEN 00135 25514 *88.71 1. OM/03/WIN R RCB 600 FIRST 8T PARTNERSHIP 02108 001-210-0000-2110 01959 $750.00 WORK -GUAR REFUND 26401-----01-128788 R RCB 600 FIRST ST PARTNERSHIP 02108 WORK -GU 1 . 'I1 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************** 001-210-0000-2110 01961 7DEPOb ITS/WORK GUARA1r, tE *150.00 26401 05056 25515 26401 sv. v0 05057 SR 3, N 30 31 3, 33 31 33 3. 3, 3. • • • • • .,444 13 44 I3 16 4, 1. 41 31 u 33 N 33 02/v3/u831 f7 3. 25515 17- 11: = •' •'. *900.00 ry .6 /outage' R REGENTS U. C. -------PUBLICATIONSIPERSONNLL 01774 001-400-1203-4305 00131 I/17/8b $20. 00 PtnsUNN.L /OFr aCE Or.K 15'JPPLatb 04463 25516 ft. c V U'i/U3f U U .3 N .3 61 .. 0 70 71 72 73 II I3 7, rig .•, 4 I r • • r r I FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:23:03 CLTY OF NEkMOBA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/09/88 i. PAGE 0015 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************ *20.00 R ROBINSON-COLE 02107 001-210-0000-2110 01962 *900.00 - WORK-QUAR-REFUND . *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************** • IDEPOBLILNNUMK QUAKANItE *900.00 26398 05058 25517 *0. 00 0x/03/68 R SAATACHI & SAATCHI DFS -REFUNS/FItHiNQ PERMIT 49015 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***w***► 02113 001-300-0000-3823 00032 *165.00 /SrECIAL EVtNT 6ELuiITY *165.00 49015 04833 25518 *0.00 02/03/86 R SUSAN*SAXE-CLIFFORD. PH D PRE EMP PSYCH -EVIG.. 11 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************** 001-400-1203-4320 00176 a Cal .1 *1.000. 00 6 17 *1.000.00 8-0118-6 04466 25519 *0.00 02/03/68 R SELF INSURERS SERVICE. INC. REIMS GEN -LIAB1DEC-87---10 R SELF INSURERS SERVICE. REIMS i. 11 11 INC. R SELF INSURERS SERVICE. INC. REIMB/ 00824 705-400-1209-4324 00025 *5.833.13 01/15/88 LIABILIIr INS /CLAInB/StI uI.. rItpII 00824 00824 *** VENDOR TOTAL 705-400-1217-4182 00039 *861.75 COMP /WORKERS Cum CORRtNT E10482 04468 25520 su. uO 01/03 - - 2259 04467 25520 705-400-1217-4183 00030 *984.43 PMIOR rK *7.679. 31 *0.00 C/a/03/69 2258 04467 25520 *0.00 01/03/68 401 .. I R SHELL OIL CO. 00320 001-400-2101-4310 00123 *4.79 01/x2/88 .,; *** VENDOR TOTAL **** ..r 9 " ' 7, iCt MOTOR' 1-utLli ARU LJbt9 *4. 79 0123333 05134 25521 *U.ON 01/U.S/66 R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. MISC CHOW -JAN -88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******** 01399 001-400-4204-4309 00830 *97.04 00188 25522 : Al , .,1 f« a *97.04 R SIR SPEEDY 00361 -_--PKQ PERM 6180 01715/88 110-400-3302-4305 00357 *97.20 PAMKMO-ENF-/uFFICE urEM 6{JPPLIES 6180 05206 25523 $97.20 OW/03/69 I0 U 12 13 14 i1 u 1. I. zo 11 11 1. 1. 22 m 21 24 19 30 1 11 N .1 .1 N 41 u 49 W 11 St SS 04 11 1. b 61 6t 63 6. PO 61 61 M 40 ,0 72 14 ,1 /11 J or AP .6: 6. dP rar 4101 PIP PIP 111. u • , ,.. • 0 14 ' .a 3 14 H .. 3 41 • ,, L" 'i. Glut OF mum y % 6EACH , FINANCE -88A340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0016 2 TIME 11:23:03 • FOR 02/09/88 DATE 02/04/88 ; s PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP . m *** VENDOR TOTAL *97.20 ;i N 14 R INGER*SLIZZA 02114 001-300-0000-3801 01025 *40.00 50725 04914 25524 ; • - —11CD0-Iit'UK 1 KtrUND /25 va/Z3/es /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 00.00 02/03/96 .' ,. *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************** *40.00 ,. n R SMART & FINAL IRI8 COMPANY 00114 001-400-2201-4309 00371 *26.43 0013923325 n -- -- MI8C- • _ ' ' - - . : _ ' M''...'r r ni- 2m: I R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 001-400-4202-4305 00246 *54.20 00139 25525 n `— -- -- M 02/31/8 PIIS WKS AOn1N /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00.00 02/03/99 r. I. I *** VENDOR TOTAL *********** ►*►****+*w **5**I ►w* Hl** H►sw+l ► 1r *Uu *80.63 33 • H R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER 00113 001-400-2101-4309 00118 *17.04 0014025526 u 4 00 Oz/03/89 » m i R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER 00113 001-400-4204-4321 00319 *26.63 0014023526 w -MISC CHOW/JAN-88 01/31788 BEIM u *** VENDOR TOTAL * *43.67 44 41" 47 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 18721 *8.601.00 05146 25527 ------ ---------C'ITE OZfol/dO 7COURT FINES/PAKKINV f0. 00 0Z/03/150 •• 30 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************** *8.601.00 n u !. R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00400 110-300-0000-3302 18723 *36.00 722049/724136 05234 25528 u -- -- CITATION-BA224136 01/d8feet 7000RT--FZNE87PARKING w. 00 02/01/99 " " *** VENDOR TOTAL **** **** s36.oo .. „ .1 42 R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY 00162 001-400-1141-4305 00049 *12.78 01241 25529 " MISC-CHOS/DEC"87 12731/87 Carr 1KEAbUReN /Urrlct wpm SOPPLats Iv. 00 Oz/03/159 N R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY 00162 001-400-1201-4305 00078 *7.67 01241 25529 .. OPER SUPPLIES 00. 00 0Y/V3/e2110 •• 70 n n 74 H n • 1 ;;- • 4 1• 6 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:23:03 GITt OF HEM7o15A BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/09/88 PAGE 0017 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 11 R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY MISC 00162 001-400-1207-4305 00099 L41J11 7 R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY MISC R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY MSC CHOS/DEC 87 R SOUTH BAY OFFICE R SOUTH BAY OFFICE MIBC - 1 R SOUTH BAY OFFICE Mn- - 1 • r 15 la SUPPLY SUPPLY SUPPLY R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY -?tISC CHOS/DEG 07 00162 $24.44 BUS LICENSE /OrFICE OPER BuPPLIt8 001-400-2101-4305 00602 $4.60 01241 25529 w. 00 02/u3/15ns 01241 25529 00162 001-400-2201-4305 00156 12/31/87 FI1cE 00162 001-400-4101-4305 00166 11 $13.63 /Orr ICE OPER SUPPLIES $18.02 44 .'. /0.!/1515 01241 25529 •0.00 u2/03/Bb 01241 00162 011 001-400-4102-4305 00050 $6.39 NO --COMM- /uFF ICE OYErc SUPPLIES 00162 001-400-4202-4305 00245 $8.09 '_ '11 00162 110-400-3302-4305 00359 12/31 /151/ *** VENDOR TOTAL +sc ****+w*usa*****Is+ssw►***411 ►41w4►w+tcs*** .1- $20.45 1- $20.45 '1 1 1 01241 25529 1. 14 15 16 1 1. m 71 23 15 71 02/u3/at15 :5 AMRIMII ENr /uFF1t.t Ortic surPLIt8 $116.07 50. v0 M 25529 715 02/03/w .9 01241 25529 w. uu u1/u3/am 01241 25529 $0.00 02/u3/158 R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP -- --_ WATER- COOLER-RENTIDEG 87 R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP ITER' R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP ..—it14'TER-COOL a 1 - [ «r a. 00146 001-400-2101-4305 00603 12/31/87 POLICE 00146 001-400-4204-4201 00206 12/a1/87 - BLDG mAINT 00146 001-400-4601-4305 00455 11 1 - $102.56 /OrrICt urtm bur Lamm $44.43 /COlIRAC1 btrcvICE/PKavA. 11 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******+s**** *** ****N***** $34.45 t.t urtic surrL.atm $181.44 00033 25530 .. 11 32 61 u 17 >s 59 90 w. uu uz/03781- 15 16 00033 25530 w. vu u1/1/u3/tl151 1• ,. 00033 25530 ;; w. 00 ud/03/8!1 55 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO ST-MA/NT/UAN-88 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO —ST 1tA1NTIV - SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00139 -02731701 $1.617.50 8( nAlnit1aw11iCE /CONTRACT BEmvauE/PRIvAr 00115 001-400-6101-4201 00089 $1.664.00 00029 25531 sO.uO 00029 31 5. 59 00 02/03/815! 61 6! N 1M 6J 6. SQ. 0o UM/03/1515 69 10 !1 13 16 25531 00115 110-400-3301-4201 00140 • $2.067.50 00029 25531 PRO Da81 /COrn1KACr mmmvICErrmavAT to 73 M • • • • • • • • • • V • • • • • • • • u 19 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:23:03 Cry/ i 1 OF FIENA08A DEMAND LIST PAGE 0018 FOR 02/09/88 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL a *5.349.00 R STATE OF CALIFORNIA 00364 001-400-2101-4251 00171 *16.50 853527 00023 25532 � t - • = ■ ONTRACI btKVll:t/VONT *0.00 02/03/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL * *16. 50 R VIVA*STOYKE 02104 001-300-0000-3115 01392 *150.00 Ol/1I/ *** VENDOR TOTAL CENSE *150.00 49523 01730 25533 *O: "Ou 0z/03/813 R SURF CARPET CARE *** VENDOR TOTAL 01075 r 9Y .r :1: 001-400-4204-4201 00205 *275.00 MAIN; /cuNIKA1:, btxVicft/I'KINAT 3 . *275.00 1228 04765 25534 5277.00 0Y/U3/88 R SWOPE VALUATION. INC. 02105 001-400-1202-4201 00118 *3.111.00 05138 25535 01/28/88 FINANct minim /IVNIKAI.1 umvsGE/!9(1VA1 *0.0v V2/0s/-8 *** VENDOR TOTAL *3. 111.00 R T. C. S. A. DUE87R. *** VENDOR TOTAL 00836 115-400-3104-4315 00013 *15.00 05416 25536 01/15/ww IKArrIt WA try InEMBEKIWIF 110.00 02/03/88 *15.00 R TIC-LA-DEX 02027 " 001-400-4201-4305 00261 *106.98 SP 3--HOLE3 -0172 INT—-7OFFICE OPER_burPC2E8- *** VENDOR TOTAL ********* *106.98 6833 04902 25537 $106.48— 02/03/8u R BILL *TILLEY 01337 001-210-0000-2110 01958 *150.00 26308 05054 25538 � — -- --WORK-WAR-REFUND X08 O1/a8/88 /utrasl 1131/WORK OVAKAN ME *0.1711 u2/03/8H *** VENDOR TOTAL *150.00 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY .-- MIBC CHOSIJAN-8B 00124 001-400-6101-4309 00405 *149.01 01rs1/ PARK$ /NAaNitNANct PIATCKIA.8 10 H 36 u 10 30 31 21 23 39 72 ,a 39 30 31 32 33 3. SS 36 3, u 39 40 61 63 .3 N 6S 6. V 69 02 S3 24 SS 3a S, 39 119 60 02 63 44 N 0 44 70 00146 25539 n *0. ,3 ,6 ,S 14 • 0 • • • 11111 41 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 11:23:03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0019 FOR 02/09/88 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MI SG CHOS/JAN 88 ••• VENDOR TOTAL **************** 00124 160-400-3102-4309 00255 $35.30 00146 25539 01,31/88 ShWUK/UT AMAIN ,nAINICNANUft-MRTEMIALB *0.00 02ivaie� $184.31 TOWN & COUNTRY HOTEL 00702 001-400-1203-4317 00025 $117.70 TR195 00195 25540 HOTEL ADV/R. BLACKWOOD TR195 01/01/88 PtrtBuNNEL /CONFtRENCE ExPENSE *0.00 02,03188 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************** $117.70 R TRAVER'S TREE SERVICE 00404 125-400-8506-4201 00012 $400.00 04736 25541 TREE=TR!MMiNG O1/1J/88 CIP 86-504 ICE/PRtVAT ---$0700 Odiu3/8!s •** VENDOR TOTAL * H ***** $400.00 R UC REGENTS —8EMINAR/D7—MURPHY 02121 001-400-4202-4316 00092 $225.00 01/19/88 PUN WAS ADRIN ,TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL*•********************************************************IHH11-114411111-11-114 05410 25542 $225.00 *O. 00 *** R UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SERVICE 01597 001-400-1206-4201 00328 —CITATION PROGRAMING 39-00 01/14/b8 R UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SERVICE 01597 —CITATION PROGRAMMING— —60=00--01/14 VENDOR TOTAL $300.00 DATA PROCESSING /CONmuACT btIvIc.E,PRavA( 001-400-1206-4201 ARTA 00329 *105.00 '41 6 10 11 71 '3 N U N 17 U 19 7' ,r }a 24 23 27 9. 31 .: as 24 33 02/03/8* n u 39 40 .1 6059-00 05225 25543 N 6060-00 05226 UWIU 5Fbd' N N 25543 :1: 'I• C1a- • - - • .4 .•• *405.00 R WRAY PRINTING DARE-CERT/FICA 00132 001-400-2101-4305 00598 $83.07 ,OFFICE OPEN SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL ****** ********* *****MrNINI $83.07 1458 03502 25544 .9 90 91 u ss N *83.4i1 O0IuJ,bb s, t. 39 R XEROX CORPORATION Fl R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-2201-4201 00072 $58.80 015439922 05140 25545 00135 001-400-2401-4201 00159 $18.15 013422939 05139 25545 .6 • • • • • • • • ,a 73 n • �. FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:23:03 DEMAND LIST FOR 02/09/88 -.. PAGE 0020 DATE 02/04/88 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO * CHR * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R XEROX CORPORATION -FINAL BItLLN0 R XEROX CORPORATION TNI I LAL LEASE PM1 R XEROX CORPORATION DELIVERY CHAS PER R XEROX CORPORATION FINAL -BILLING *** VENDOR TOTAL 00135 001-400-2401-4201 00160 J9921 01716/W8 939 $57.36 015439921 05141 25545 ANIMAL A.ONTRui. 7CUNTKACT VIERV10E7PRiVAT 00135 001-400-4601-6900 00001 0171778!{ *337.26 .Uflfl I( .bUUHCFb FLEALit rAYP1ENTS 00135 110-400-3302-4201 00161 _ :1: a'I 00135 110-400-3302-4201 00162 tl 01/16/88 PARKING ENF *36.85 $116.47 so. oo 0Z7037CR3 00052 25545 SO. 00 0Z/03/88 015422939 05139 25545 015439921 05141 25545 /CONTRACT StNVIcE,PRIVAr *624.89 50.00 OZ703799 R DOROTHY*ZAMMIT ANIMAL TKAY-KlrUND *** VENDOR TOTAL **** 02103 001-210-0000-2110 01951 01717/88 *50.00 50379 05046 25546 7DEPOBJ 1-51wum OUANANLEE 50. 00 0.Z/03/H9 *50.00 *** PAY CODE TOTAL ** *138.058.97 *** TOTAL WARRANTS *149.087.91 1 HERESY CERTIFY THAT THE" �D�EM�ANDS .O�R�3 CLAIMS COVERED IT THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGES L.TOL� INCLUSIVE OF THE RWISTER FOP ARE ACCURATE AND FUNDS ME AVAILABLE FOR PAYI NT THEREOF: SY NAN ADMINISTRATOR DATE 11 13 13 I. 1, u 14 m 24 23 31 a r. m 11 33 H f3 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 3, 1988 City Council Meeting of February 9, 1988 CITY MANAGER ACTIVITY REPORT - Met with new Vice President of Multi Visions Cable (formerly named M. L. Media) to discuss City problems with the cable franchise. On-going preparation for mid -year budget review scheduled for Council meeting of February 23, 1988. - Preparation of agenda for Council meeting of February 9th. - Continue to work on all matters pertaining to AT&SF acquisition. Dates to remember: February 13 - Community Center Foundation Gala featuring Dianne Reeves and Kenny Rankin March 19 - David Benoit Concert at the Hermosa Civic Theatre 4:#64;;OlgAgallICS Alana M. Mastrian Acting City Manager AMM/1d 1 1d February 2, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 9, 1988 APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE GENERAL EMPLOYEES' BARGAINING UNIT MOU ESTABLISHING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHER IN THAT UNIT AND ESTABLISHING A SALARY RANGE FOR THE CLASSIFICATION Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Man- ager to execute the attached Supplemental to the General Em- ployees' Bargaining Unit Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) which establishes: 1. The classification of Public Safety Dispatcher in the General Employees' Bargaining Unit, and 2. A salary range for the classification. Background: During the closed session of January 23, 1988, the City Council Gave instruction to negotiate with representatives of the Teamster Union, Local 911, for the purpose of establishing a sal- ary range, and determining the appropriate bargaining unit for the classification of Public Safety Dispatcher. The Public Safety Dispatcher class specification was approved by the Council on October 27, 1987. Analysis: Consistent with the organizational pattern of the City, and based upon the similarity of the general kinds of responsibilities to be performed by the Public Safety Dispatcher, the appropriate bargaining unit was determined to the the General Employees' Bar- gaining Unit. As a result of the "meet and confer" process, a five step salary range of $1810-$2200 per month, with incremental increases of 5%, was agreed to. This salary range is consistent with the ranges of other classes in the bargaining unit which have similar responsibilities and experience requirements. Following approval, the attached supplemental will be effective February 15, 1988. Recruitment and testing will commence shortly thereafter. Respectfully subm e4J Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Concur: 7/46g;;; Alana Mastrian Acting City Manager le A SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE SEPTEMBER 1, 1985 - AUGUST 31, 1988 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND CALIFORNIA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL, AND MEDICAL EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 911 GENERAL EMPLOYEES' BARGAINING UNIT Effective February 15, 1988, Exhibit A, the schematic list of class titles and base monthly salary schedule, of the Memorandum of Understanding, General Employees' Bargaining Unit, is amended to include the class title of PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHER with a salary range as follows: A B C D E 1810 1900 1995 2095 2200 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused their duly au- thorized representatives to execute this supplemental Memorandum of Understanding this day of , 1988. Alana Mastrian, Acting City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Michael K. Flaherty, Chief Union Steward, California Teamsters Public, Professional & Medical Employees Union, Local 911 C" • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 • 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GEOFFREY M. WARREN Attorney at Law 2200 Pacific Coast Highway Suite 302 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (213) 318-3366 Attorney for Claimant PAUL BARRETT HERRIOTT In re the Claim of: ) ) PAUL BARRETZ' HERRIOTT, ) ) Claimant, ) ) Against ) ) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIF- ) ORNIA and Police Officer : ) KELLY, No. •0.80, ) ) Respondents. ) ) •A/ X'*-1.feaZ CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FOR FALSE ARREST, FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND UNLAWFULLY RESTRICTING AND LIMITING STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE EXERCISE OF FREE SPEECH AND EXPRESSION. e/m 1. Claimant's name is PAUL BARRETT HERRIOTT and.his residential address is 123 24th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. 90254. All future communications on this matter and all notices relating thereto shall be sent to: Geoffrey M. Warren Attorney at Law 2200 Pacific Coast Highway Suite 302 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 3: On or about November 3, 1987, at or about the hour of 10:00 A.M., Claimant was arrest and charged for having violated -1- if (1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 28A-15 of the Hermosa Beach City Code, which provides in relevant part: "* * *. No political signs shall be posted on public property or utility poles. * * *." Claimant at that time had his personal vehicle parked at 90 Pier Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beach and had posters set on the sal motor vehicle, and he had two other posters setting on the ground temporarily while he made preparations to place them on his own motor vehicle. At that time the said "Spike" Kelly, Serial No. 080, arrested Claimant and cited him as noted supra. Further, tri said Kelly confiscated the posters --personal property of Claimant - which posters were advocating the election of a local political figure, who was subsequently elected to a contested public office. 4. Claimant was injured in that he was deprived of his contitutional right to speak publically and advocate the election o a citizen of'the community to public office. Claimant was humil- iated and embarrassed by the arrest and the opprobrium connected therewith; being a professional sailor in the merchant marine, it was necessary that he miss time at sea to answer the charge, and thereby he lost substantial income, and Claimant was caused to and' did hire legal assistance in answering and defending in the case. 5. As noted,the police officer who arrested Claimant known as "Spike" Kelly, Serial No. 080. At this time Claimant is demanding the sum of $500,000.0 as damages from the said respondents. DATED: January 28, 1988 /s/ Geoffrey M. Warren Geoffrey M. Warren, Attorney for Claimant PAUL BARRETT HERRIOTT -2- • CLAI IGAINST THE CITY OF HERMO: BEACH �-a SN TIE MATTER OF THE CLAIM OF • RUSSELL DAVId SPRINGSTEAD AGAINST TRE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH .1 TOE UNDERSIGNED CLAIMANT HEREBY MARES CLAM AGAINST AND VI SUPPORT OF SAID CLAIM R1.TRMIENTS AS FOLLOW* S. WHEN DID DAMAGE OR DIME! OCCUR? SL DEERE DSD DAMAGE OR INJURY OCCUR? Hermosa Beach, CA beech HE SUM OF $ (OSVS IZACT DAT: AND NOM 11-28-87 at 8:00 A.M. On sidewalk in front of 1131 Manhattan Avenue, 3. DOD DID TBE DAMAGE OR INJURY OCCUR? (otra PULL DslA1Ls - vsa asylum sunt rP wscassART) While jogging, Claimant stepped on an exposed metal pole base,causing a laceration to his right foot. 4. !HAT PARTICULAR ACT OR OMISSION ON THE PART OF CST! OFFICERS, SERVANTS OR EMPLOYEES CAUSED TOB LUURT OR DAMAGE? The failure .to repair the broken pole or properly warn pedestrians of its existence. L DRAT ARE TOE NAMES OF THE CRT OFFICERS. SERVANTS OR EMPLOYEES CAUSING THE DAMAGE OR WORT? unknown at this time S. =OAT DAMAGE OR INJURIES DO YOU CLAIM RESULTED? (errs PULL aslaNr OP IMJVRtss OR DAMAGES CLAWED) laceration to the right foot requiring 22 stitches to close. 1. D01 WAS TRE /MOUNT CLAIMED ASOVE COMPUTED? (DICLUDS TMs SSTIMATED AMOUNT OP ANr PROSPSC17ra. unknown at this time IN1var OR DAMAGE) NAME$ AND ADDRESSES OF WITNESSES, DOCTORS AND BOSPSTALO South Bay Hospital - Emergency Room on Prospect Avenue EXPENDITURE MADE ON ACCOUNT OF ACCIDENT OR INJURY: DATE ITEM SEND NOTICES TO: Gary A. Smith,Esq. 11111 West Olympic Blvd. # 300 Los Angeles,CA 90064-1805 213-479-4114 NOTICE: AMOUNT • It CLAIMANT'S SIGNATURE c/o Gary A. Smit i,Esq. t •. ADDRESS .11111 West Olympic Blvd. # 300, Los Angeles,p‘ _90064 SECTION 72 OF THE PENAL CODE PROVIDES: EVERY PERSON WHO. WITH LNTENT TO DEFRAUD, PRESENTS . FOR ALLOWANCEOR FOR PAYMENT TO ANY STATE BOARD OR OFFICER. OR TO ANY COUNTY, TOWN. alT, DISTRICT. WARD OR VILLAGE BOARD OR OFFICER. AUTHORIZED TO ALLOW OR PAY THE SAME IF GENUL'*E ANY FALSE OR FRAUDULENT CLAIM. BILL. ACCOUNT, VOUCHER. 01 WRmNG, IS OVILTY OF A FELONY. C'• 5 .. ATTORNET. 1 • CLADfwl:1. 1 — CLERK. 1 — CONTROLLER FOR LAW ONS AS TOOFIL1ING ACTIO 4 S REM ACHAPD TEERUTL I 7 1 S F STATUTES 1913 (EEC 900 ET SEC GOVERNMENT CODE) 1f() gf-3 CITY OF ATTENTI N: City Clerk LIABILITY 4 , CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROPERTY t ADDRESS: 1315 Vp, y Drive . H rmasa naar'h, ._.r 90254 10000 Police Departmen 20000 'tire Department lic Works/Par 50000 lAda nistration 60000 Wscsllaaeous 90000 'cameral Services COMES TO: �. CLAIMS FOR DEATH INJURY TO PERSON, OR TO PERSONAL PROPERTY, MUST. BE FILED NOT LATER THAN 100 DAYS AFTER THE OCCURRENCE (GOV. CODE, SEC. 911.2). 2. 3. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES TO REAL PROPERTY MUST BE FILED NOT LATE OCCURRENCE (GOV. CODE, SEC. 911.2). READ ENTIRE CLAIM FORM BEFORE EJLING. 4. ATTACH SEPARATE SHEETS, IF NECESSARY, TO GIVE FULL DETAILS s -,A $ pie 1 -re ifrt ore WAME OF CLAIMANT: j)ARRELL LEE- GRFE:thd.A14) ;id% TER TF ty ' we HOME ADDRESS OF CLAIMANT (STREET, CITY AND STATE) ' /0/6 STRAND ljER orol REA<:11 /CA 902-r4 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 376- 6133 I3USINESS ADDRESS OF CLAIMANT (STREET, CITY AND STATE) sneer TELEPHONE NUMBER: GIVE ADDRESS TO WHICH YOU DESIRE NOTICES OR COMMUNICATIONS TO BE SENT REGARDING TH • CLAIM: V/A-7(' DAMA6e ~GATE OF ACCIDENT:POTIME: • A.M. P.1 ('LACE OF ACCIDENT (BE SPECIFIC) HOW DID DAMAGE OR INJURY OCCUR? (BE SPECIFIC) • • r' ✓)E _bee- Dt:PARTitti6N'i 4 c, I ry f/gotv..zt ' WERE-POUGE AT SCENE? YES NAME OF CITY EMPLOYEE CAUSING THE INJURY OR DAMAGE, IF KNOWN • GIVE TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM (INCLUDE ESTIMATE AMOUNT OF ANY PROSPECTIVE INJURY OR DAMAGE). HOW WAS AMOUNT OF CLAIM COMPUTED? (BE SPECIFIC. LIST DOCTOR BILL, WAGE RATE, REPAIR ESTIMATES, ETC.). PLEASE ATTACH TWO ESTIMATES: if (3)- EXPENDITURES MADE ON ACCOUNT OF ACCIDENT OR INJURY (DATE AND ITEM). NAME AND ADDRESS OF WITNESSES, DOCTORS AND HOSPITALS: H• �. j'/R6 Dt"/or. 1 A4Rio saogo e,e DEQ-!• fr M L•' 1r PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY: For all accident claims, place on following diagram names of streets, including North, East, South and Wes indicate place of accident by "X" and by showing house numbers or distances to street corners. If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City Vehicle when you first saw it, and b) "B" location of yourself or you vehicle when you first saw City Vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A-1" and location of yourself or your vehicle by the time of the accident by "B-1" and the point of impact by "X". NOTE: IF DIAGRAMS BELOW DO NOT FIT THE SITUATION, ATTACH HERETO A PROPER DIAGRAM SIGNED BY CLAIMANT. For Automobile Accidents 1 , / 7 A \ // Curb For Othe Accidents Sidewalk Parkway dewalk i Cur 1 HAVE READ THE FOREGOING CLAIM AND KNOW THE CONTENTS THEREOF: AND CERTIFY THAT TI SAME 1S TRUE OF MY OWN KNOWLEDGE EXCEPT AS TO THOSE MATTERS WHICH ARE HEREBY STATEC UPON MY INFORMATION AND BELIEF: AND AS TO THOSE MATTERS 1 BELIEVE IT TO BE TRUE. I CERTIFY (OR DECLARE) UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY.THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CO CT. DATED: 1 411 (SIGNED): V-9d444t" 62/ Note: Presentation of o false claim is a felony (CAL. PEN. CODE 72). 1-29-88 Lois .R. Peek (Chief Deputy City Clerk) City of Hermosa'Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach,CA 90254 Rea Your letter dated 12-22-87, about our flood damage request. Dear Mr. Peek: • Enclosed is the filled out claims form you requested. I am also listing the following damage estimates as you requested. 1. Motel office carpet replaced $825.00. 2. Laundry room linoleum replaced 500.00. 3. 2 double beds (mattress and boxspring) 402.80. 4. Misc. motel furniture(dressors and desks) 250.00. 5. five boxes of laundry detergent 175.73. 6. Employee labor used to sand bag and to use suction equipment to save carpets and storage places with furniture and office equipment in it. Employee 1 13.75 an hour for 4 hours = 55.00 Employee 2 11.00 an hour for 5 hours = 55.00 Employee 3 5.00 an hour for 16 hours = 80.00 Employee 4 4.30 an hour for 21 hours = 90.30 Total amount of claim at present. $2433.83. We are still waiting to see if several items will dry out and be in good usable condition. If not , I will add them to this claim. Respectfully, Darrell Lee Greenwald. • FLOORING .PROPOSAL • ease; Qeande a:teeioee . 8325 Lexington & Gallatin Rd. PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA 90660 • (213) 8640230 ••. • 1-vps7SEmSR• ITE MOTEL `'Gate j . Janu-ary 25, , 1988 street .. r, . i , "1016 Strand ' Job NORM City.State and Zip Code - - . Hermosa Bnseach1 , :.California 90254 Job Location • - Z-6933 37• I+/ i0UN88 - . Proposal Made By . Job Phone . . .. . Installer SCala: WI 8 6 7 0 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 16 10 2C 21 22 23 24 36 26 27 211 29 90 31 32 3 , REPIACF, FLOOD DAMAGED CARPET: IN OFFICE 4. e . • • Take up old carpet, t_le and danaged tackLess strip e Instal_ new carpet Stonebourgh =I 28-5285; color # 54808 • TO^AL $825.00 • to' s m' fd/i'- �1 C /Owe n '4 . 41. l 1 ROOM MFR. PATTERN COLOR SIZE N. YDS. PRICE/YO. AMOUNT JOB PROPOSAL . PADDING a .. _.,_ .�., - _ .. ADHESIVE .� ....r.. • MOLDING • �; ':„ MATERIALS _- •_ • _. - . _ . • SUB -TOTAL LABOR • SALES TAX • _ .. __ _ :.. TOTaI • DEPOSIT BALANCE ACCEPTANCE I hereby accept the proposal outlined above and authorize work to commence on the date specified. has been completed to my satisfaction. CERTIFICATION: This is to certify that the above described work Customei nate Customer Date OFFICE COPY ' 12-16-87 City Council Hermosa beach Dear Council members: On December 7th we had the first rain of the season. Our Motel office , laundry room and lower rooms were all flooded. We were not prepared for this disaster since the city had recently paid a great deal of money to have a new flood drainage system installed on beach drive from loth st. to Pier Ave., for the purpose of rectifying this very problem. We sustained some damage to our office and other facilities. Please put me in contact with the city's Insurance carrier. Some city employees came to tell us that whenever there is a high tide and it is raining we will be flooded again and the City can not prevent it. They stated the reason was because when the new system was installed , they built the exit to the system too close to the ocean. They stated that they new that was going to be a problem since that was part of the problem with the old system. In fact they built the new system some 20 feet closer to the ocean then the old system and whenever there is a high tide the bulldozer can't clear the flood drainage exit out because it will get stuck in the sand. I feel there are some questions you should be looking for some answers to. 1. After spending a large amount of funds to replace an old system with a new system , why doesn't the new system work any better than the old system? 2. If some city employees knew having the flood drainage exit close to the ocean would be a severe problem why did they allow the new system to be built even closer to the ocean? I would like to say that several city employees were very kind for filling some sand bags for us; however a few sand bags will not rectify this problem. Please look into this problem as soon as possible since we are now in the rainy season. Respectfully, e/9°Akel/ (R.Q Darrell Lee Greenwald CI' ( OF ItGI3MO$J1 .13E(Kit CIVIC CENTER HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA 90254 CITY HALL: (213) 376-6984 POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS: 376.7981 December 22, 1987 Mr. Darrell Lee Greenwald Sea Sprite Apartment Motel 1016 The Strand Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Your letter dated 12-16-87 Flood Damage • Dear Mr. Greenwald: We are in receipt of your referenced letter in which you claim water damage at the Sea Sprite due to the recent rains. Enclosed you will find a Claim for Damages form which should be completed and returned to this office within 100 days of the occurrence. Also please submit estimates of the damage and photos if possible. The claim will then be forwarded to the City's claims adjuster, Self Insurers Service, who should contact you regarding resolution of this problem. Very truly yours, LOIS R. PEER Chief Deputy City Clerk 1p Att. - January 28, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council February 9, 1988 REVIEW OF PIGEON PROBLEM SOLUTIONS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. Background: At your regularly scheduled meeting of September 22, 1987, the City Council reviewed written communication from Mr. James Reynolds, 449 Hollowell Avenue, requesting that an ordinance be drawn up to prohibit the feeding of pigeons on public lands and grounds. At that time, the City Council directed staff to prepare a report regarding this matter indicating alternative solutions. Subsequently, at your regularly scheduled meeting of November 10, 1987, staff submitted a report offering the following alternatives; (1) to receive and file the report, (2) direct staff to send a letter to the person feeding the pigeons, giving them a chance to abate the nuisance before the City Council takes any formal action and (3) direct staff to prepare an ordinance prohibiting the feeding of pigeons. The City Council chose alternative #2. A letter was sent to Mr. and Mrs. Paul Bratti, 348 Hollowell Avenue (see attached) on November 13, 1988, advising them of the action taken by the City Council. A response was received from Mrs. Bratti, dated November 17, 1987 (see attached). The response asked several questions but was non -committal as far as compliance with the request of the City Council. On November 25th staff attempted to respond to the questions posed by Mrs. Bratti and again requested compliance to the City Council direction (see attached). Mrs. Bratti responded with a letter to Mayor Simpson and the City Council, dated December 10, 1988. This letter reiterated certain facts and stated the opinion of Mrs. Bratti (see attached). The time to resolve this problem was running out. Staff was directed to conduct a neighborhood survey in order to determine if (1) the problem still existed and (2) if it were a source of annoyance to the neighborhood at large. Subsequent to the taking of the survey, we received further correspondence from Mrs. Bratti, dated January 16, 1988. In this letter (see attached) Mrs. Bratti states that they will comply with the Council direction and no longer continue to feed the pigeons. lti Analysis: The results of the neighborhood survey, taken on January 12, 1988, indicate a split vote among the residents. Eighteen homes were surveyed, all responded. Of the eighteen, nine were in favor of an ordinance regulating bird feeding and nine were against. Of the nine in favor of the ordinance, four maintained that the problem was current and directly affected them. Others observed the problem but were not directly affected. The survey results and a map of the area surveyed is available should the council wish to see the documentation. The bottom line is that this whole issue appears to be isolated to one neighborhood. We have not received any complaint regarding the feeding of pigeons from any other area of the city. Since Mr. and Mrs. Bratti are willing to comply with the City Council direction and the wishes of their neighbors, it does not seem necessary or prudent to recommend an ordinance prohibiting the feeding of pigeons, at this time. Jo Noon General Services Director Concur: �Z L -WX0i;et--.<---------) Alana Mastrian Acting City Manager BACHGROUND N4TERIAL 348 B HOLLOWELL AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 372-6237 January 16, 1987 Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach. Ca 90254 Dear Mayor and Council Members: The survey for the pigeon issue surprised us. We were not aware that this number of people on our block did not like pigeons. But, why wasn't a survey taken sooner? Of Course, the majority rules. We will not feed the lovely pigeons at the Park, in the future. This matter,, at no time, required an Ordinance against pigeons, as it was confined to one (1) block and a -few people. It should have been handled by arbitration. An Ordinance of this nature would affect every child and adult in our community that are innocent of any wrong doing. It would be totally unfair and unreasonable to impose an Ordinance on the people. If you are annoyed -with me, tell me so. But others should not be punished for something they did not do. If you should be determined to have this ordinance, then let the citizens vote on it. They should have the right to their choice in the situation. Also, it is your duty and privilege to request us or anyone else to stop a condition that causes a nuisance in a neigborhood. And we would be happy to give you our full cooperation. However, your letter to us states it is your desire to give us an opportunity to abate, prior to taking formal formal action, such as generating an ordinance to prohibit the feeding of pigeons. So, instead of a request, it became an intimidating letter, which we did not appreciate. It was inappropriate and unnecessary. In our opinion, the residents of the City would appreciate it less than we do. We request that you correct this oversight. Yours truly, ditki/e,/ der Phylis Bratti .sad Awt& 348 B HOLLOWELL AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 3724237 December 10, 1987 Honorable Mayor Simpson Hermosa Beach City Council Members City Hall Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Mayor Simpson and City Council Members: We are enclosing a copy of a letter, dated November 25, 1987, from Michele Tercero, the City's Administrative Aide, that states the City Council did not request staff to visit Mr. Reynold's home or take a survey for the staff report on the pigeon issue. The scenario started by Mr. Reynolds sending a letter, dated August 20, 1987, to the City Council requesting an ordinance against feeding pigeons on public property. In addition, he wrote that this is a nuisance and health problem in our City. The scope of an ordinance of this nature is so wide that it would affect every child and adult in our community. But the City Council found no reason to substantiate or verify Mr. Reynold's alleged claims. This man's real problem is that he does not like pigeons! He has a brand new, beautiful home that is without damage of any nature from the pigeons, nor have any of the rest of the homes on our block or in the neighborhood been damaged in any way by pigeons. On September 22, 1987, the City Council heard public testimony in the case. Mr. Reynolds and three other people (or friends), were in favor of the ordinance. One person was against it. The City Council voted for a staff report on the pigeon issue. There was no further evidence or facts. On November 10, 1987, the City Council voted for Alternative 2 of the staff report, which staff wrote in the office without any knowledge or witnessing the pigeon nuisance or potential health hazard that staff claims in this report. The above letter from the City's Administrative Aide, dated November 25, 1987, confirms this fact. Therefore, the staff report is incorrect and invalid regarding Paragraph 4 of the Analysis and Alternative 2. • Honorable Mayor of Hermosa Beach City Council Members December 10, 1987 Page 2. It would therefore, appear that the council's staff report regarding this incident is invalid and flawed, since it was not based on fact but pure speculation. Pending the resolution of this matter on February 16, 1988, we therefore request the council reconsider its position and inves- tigate the true facts in the matter. Hermosa Beach is, after all, a bird sanctuary. Sincerely, . -i P. A. Bratti cc: Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals City of 2lermosci 13eac1v November 25, 1987 Mr. Paul Bratti Mrs. Phylis Bratti 348 B Hollowell Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Bratti; In reference to your letter of November 17, 1987 (copy enclosed), I am including the agenda item submitted to the City Council on November 10, 1987. As you will note, Ms. Noon refers to her attempt to contact Mr. Reynolds, but was unable to do so, since his telephone number is not listed. Mr. Reynolds did, however, receive a copy of the agenda item (#7) pertaining to this matter, by personal delivery to his home. The Council at their meeting of September 22, 1987, directed staff to prepare a staff report, indicating alternative solutions. That staff report is the subject of the enclosed agenda item. Council made no request of staff to visit Mr. Reynolds home. Additionally, since Council did not request a survey, and there is no past practice or policy requiring a survey in this type of situation, none was circulated. I hope I have been able to answer your questions satisfactorily. Although you indicate you -have received our letter requesting that you not feed the pigeons in your neighborhood, it is not mentioned whether you are complying with the Council's request. Since this matter is scheduled for review and a status report, 90 days from November 10, 1987, (February 16, 1988) it would be supportive of not initiating an ordinance prohibiting feeding the pigeons, if a letter from you, indicating your compliance with the direction of the Council, were on file. Please call me if you have any questions, or if I can be of any assistance. Happy Holidays !! Sincerely, ILIA •r-cir Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide ft • :ity Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379.33121376-6984 • Fire Department 376-2479 / 376.6984 • Police Department 376-7981 / 376-6984 — 1 g sem& 348 B HOLLOWELL AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 372-6237 November 17, 1987 Ms. Michele Tercero General Services Dept. City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, Ca 90254 Res Staff Report, dated November 2, 1987 Dear Ms. Tercero: We are in receipt of you letter, dated November 13, 1987. However, regarding the Staff Report, dated November 2, 1987, on the Pigeon Problem, please let us know the name and date of the person/persons on staff that visited Mr. Reynolds' home. We would like very much to talk with this individual or individuals, as we, too, have been to the Reynolds' home. Also, was there any type of survey done at the neighborhood on the Pigeon Problem? Is this a customary procedure for a report? We are sorry that more people do not appreciate the beauty of a Pigeon. Prehaps if they had some knowledge of Ecology or Organic Gardening, they might. We thank you for your help in the above matter, and shall await hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Phylis Bratti ve • A �. City of 21ermosa lam. each November 13, 1987 Mr. Paul Bratti Mrs. Phylis Bratti 348 Hollowell Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bratti; Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 The City Council, at their regularly scheduled meeting of November 11, 1987, has directed staff to send this letter, asking that you discontinue feeding the pigeons, in your neighborhood. It is their desire to give you the opportunity to abate, what they consider a nuisance, prior to taking any formal action, such as generating an ordinance to prohibit feeding the pigeons.. I understand, this is not the direction you hoped the Council would take, but I hope you find this action to be in the best interest of the community. I thank you for your interest in the pigeons of our city, and hope we can count on your cooperation, by complying with the request of the City Council. If you have any questions, or if I can be of any assistance to you, please call. I may be reached at (213) 376-6984 ext. 257. Cordially, Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide General Services Dept. cc: City Council Joan Noon, Director General Services MDT/(mt) City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379.33121376.6984 • Eire1Department 376.2479 / 376.6984 • Police Department 376-7981 /376-6984 JUST FOR FUN We are not alone 44—Friday, November 27,1987, Santa Maria, Calif., Times Pigeon doo-doo now a don'f-don.'t • SANTA CLARA — The birds gather gradually each day at the corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Saratoga Avenue until hundreds dot the telephone lines. • A nice Hitchcockian touch, but these birds are harmless. It's their pigeon smidgen that has the neighborhood crying fowl. For three years, residents and businesses have battled a service station owner who insists on feeding the flock. Now, the city of Santa Clara has issued a complaint ordering him to stop. Frank Mamacos says that's for the birds. "These are God's creatures," Mamacos said Thursday. "I don't go to church so this is my donation." Put this in your collection plate: Mamacos, owner of the Exxon Station at Stevens Creek and Saratoga, has spent more than $350 each month feeding the pigeons that roost on nearby power lines and his service station roof. The problem is that whatever goes in ... People walking underneath the power lines are sitting ducks. ;'Likewise are parked cars and businesses in close proximity. "It's not very appetizing," said Tony Hardin, owner of the nearby Wienerschnitzel fast-food restaurant, which draws greedy pigeons looking for scraps. Two women who work in the Stevens Creek BMW automobile dealership and park near the gas station said pigeon poop has forced them to repaint their cars. • • "There is no known paint on a car that will withstand bird droppings," said Marlene Chase, warranty administrator at the BMW dealership. • st • Other residents and business people have complained as well, and as a result, Santa Clara city housing inspector Tosh Okano last month ordered Mamacos to quit feeding the birds or face a second notice, and possible citation and fine. • . - Mamacos, 57, was cited under a section of the Santa Clara city code that says people cannot allow animals in their control to "defecate or urinate on private properties" other their own. Mamacos does not think the word "animal" applies to birds. But he. said he complied with the complaint — temporarily at least. "I'm thinking of suing the city," said Mamacos, who on Thursday delivered a letter to the Planning Department asking that he be allowed to resume feeding the birds. Mamacos, who has owned the station for 91/3 years, ignored an earlier request from Exxon Corp. to quit feeding the pigeons. "How could I stop?" he asked. "I love wildlife." He said he always has fed birds at his station but began buying seed in earnest three years ago when some pigeons were poisoned in San Jose. By Kristin Huckshorn Knight-Ridder Newspapers Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council February 1, 1988 City Council Meeting of February 9, 1988 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of January 1988. Respectfully submitted, Ga B sch City Tr-asurer NOTED: Arana Mastrian Acting City Manager 1i INVESTMENT REPORT - JANUARY 1988 INSTITUTION__ _ _ TOTAL_. _ . s _ _ _. _. _._��T�_o� ZEST�IEIT_ _. _ ... DATE._4F...MATURITY. ... _INTEREST LEI BALANCE 12/31/87 Withdrawal Investment Withdrawal Withdrawal Investment Withdrawal Balance 1/31/88 $5,000,000.00 (200,000.00) 200,000.00 (550,000.00) (140,000.00) 175,000.00 (80,000.00) $4,405,000.00 Amgrlean Sayings,A.Loan Investment County_. $a.Xi0gs _ Ba0k Investment Farmer's _Savings Investment $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 99,000.00 CalifQrni_a..Federal ..$,43, Investment $ 100,000.00 First, Call 'ornla _Fed.. S,& L Investment Long_$gach. S._. L Investment $ 99,000.00 $ 100,000.00 1/8/88 1/21/88 10/21/87 12/23/87 12/23/87 12/28/87 1/6/88 1/6/88 1/6/88 1/12/88 1/19/88 1/27/88 4/18/88 1/6/89 3/23/88 6/31/88 1/6/89 1/6/89 8.071% 8.25% 8.375% 8.85% 8.15% 9.0% 8.5% Bro()R;10_$.&,It Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.5% gal_Ameriga4_SaY11114 Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.75% e ,etiai . Saving. Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.75% Pacifig.$avinga Dank Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.85% $everly.Hilla $. Investment $ 99,000.00 1/15/88 1/17/89 9.15% , 'HLMC Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Investment $ 248,733.64 3/26/87 3/1/17 8.0% Investment $ 249,320.88 5/26/87 8/1/16 9.50% TOTAL BALANCE $5,996454.52 Respectfully Submitted, Gary Bru oh City Trsurer Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 2, 1988 Regular Meeting of February 9, 1988 AWARD OF BID PIER LIGHTING GROUNDING SYSTEM CIP 85-203 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Parker Diving Service (Exhibit A) for the repair of the pier lighting grounding system in an amount not to exceed $30,062; 2. authorize staff to issue change orders as necessary, and 3. transfer $19,062 from CIP 85-201 (Light Conversion and New Installation) to CIP 85-203. 2ackground: The purpose of CIP 85-203 is to repair the lighting system on the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier. Preliminary investigation has indicated that the Pier's original electrical grounding system is missing, and is in need of replacement. Consequently, the pier infrastructure (from railing to ocean floor) requires the installation of an electrical grounding system before the light fixtures can be upgraded. On October 13, 1987, City Council authorized staff to advertise for bids for repair of the pier lighting grounding system. There were no bids received on the bid due date, November 6, 1987. On November 24, 1987, City Council authorized staff to re -advertise for bids for the pier grounding repairs, and issue addenda as necessary. Analysis: A Notice Inviting Bids was published, and plans and specifications were sent to five interested contractors. The remainder of this analysis is divided into the following sections: 1. Receipt of Bids 2. Analysis of Bids 3. Fiscal Impact 4. Alternatives 1. Receipt of Bids On Wednesday, December 23, 1987, two bids were received, publicly opened and read aloud, as follows: 11 1 Contractor Bid International Maritime, Inc. dba, Parker Diving Service Not to Exceed Wright Diving Service, Inc. Not to Exceed Engineer's Estimate $26,829.00 $18,785.75 $17,402.00 (Engineer's Estimate provided by Ronald Nisbet Associates, Inc., the City's consultant for this project.) All bids are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. 2. Analysis of Bids All bidders were required to attend the pre-bid meeting with City staff and the consultant prior to submitting their bid, so that all bidders would have an equal understanding of the scope of work. On January 12, 1988, Wright Diving Service withdrew their bid, due to a mathmematical error on their part. By withdrawing their bid, they are prohibited from re -submitting a bid unless the entire project is re -bid. Consequently, Parker Diving Service is the second low bidder with a proposal of $26,829. After verifying the extended unit costs, staff discovered an arithmetic error in the proposal, resulting in a revised proposal cost of $27,329. The State Contractor's License Board has indicated that Parker Diving Service has valid Class A (general engineering and Class B general building) contractor's licenses and that they have taken no disciplinary action against Parker Diving Service. Staff has conducted a reference check and received outstanding reports from 5 of the 5 references contacted. Parker Diving Service is the lowest and most responsible -bidder. 3. Fiscal Impact CIP 85-203 Anticipated Costs Construction Not to exceed $27,329 Contingency (107) 2,733 Total Construction Costs (contract amount) Inspection Costs Total Anticipated Costs Amount Budgeted (FY 87-88) Additional funds required to complete this project $30,062 $ 2,200 $32,262 $13,200 $19,062 Please refer to Exhibit B for existing and proposed budgets for CIP 85-203 and CIP 85-201. As you can see, the original total budgeted amount for CIP 85-203 was $24,200; only $13,200 of which was budgeted for FY 87-88. It was anticipated that construction would begin in FY 86-87 and that only $13,200 would be required to complete the project in FY 87-88. However, due to the complexity of this project (the difficulty locating a qualified design firm for such a specialized project, the need for an underwater investigation, etc.), we were unable to start construction in FY 86-87. Consequently, additional funds are required at this time. Staff recommends transferring $19,062 from CIP 85-201 to CIP 85-203 as follows: FY 87-88 CIP 85-201 CIP 85-203 Existing Budgeted Amount $55,000 $13,200 Proposed Budgeted Amount $35,938 $32,262 4. Alternatives Other alternatives available to Council and considered by staff are: 1. Re -bid the project for a second time. Due to the increased workload of the construction diving industry generated by the recent storm, staff does not recommend this alternative. Re -bidding at this time may result in no bids or cost inflated bids being received. 2. Drop the project, resulting in no lighting on the pier. Respect - submitted, fL.t fjiw Deborah M. Murphy Assistant Enginee Concur: aAw-/i0( Alana Mastrian Acting City Manager Attachments: plgs/m Concur: Ant ony Antic Director of P blic Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Exhibit A - Agreement Exhibit B - CIP Budgets (CIP 85-201 & 85-203) Exhibit C - Project Schedule Exhibit A CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PIER GROUNDING REPAIRS CIP 85-203 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 1987, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "City", and "Contractor". , hereinafter referred to as WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, City and Contractor have executed the bonds at- tached and incorporated by this reference, and WHEREAS, City desires to contract with Contractor to perform the services detailed in said bonds and in the Specifications and Proposal, and WHEREAS, Contractor has represented that it is fully qualified to assume and discharge such responsibility; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do agree as follows: 1. Scope of Work: CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to furnish all labor, materials and equipment necessary to perform the work necessary to install the Pier grounding system and achieve the -- Pier concrete repairs in accordance with the Special Provisions included hereinafter. Such work shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner, under the terms as stated herein and in the Notice to Contractors, Instructions to Bidders, and Special Pro- visions and Proposal and in accordance with the latest edition of the Joint Cooperative Committee, Southern California Chapters of the American' Public Works Association and the Associated General 1 .....s. d,.6afa;:.:....:. ��rs.ta .w�i%:�:es�+w«in�.eit+.+� a�,..2et•s...�� te=a c General Contractors of America, document entitled, "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction". In the event of any conflict between the terms of this agreement and any of the above -referenced documents, the terms of this agreement shall be controlling. 2. Compensation. In consideration of the services rendered hereunder, Contractor shall be paid according to the prices as submitted on the Proposal. Bi -weekly progress payments will be made within thirty (30) days after invoicing of Contractor's services. 3. Hold Harmless; Insurance. It is specifically understood and agreed by all parties hereto that Contractor is, for the pur- poses of this Agreement, an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Accordingly, Contractor shall not be deemed the City's employee for any purpose whatsoever. Contrac- tor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obliga- tion or liability whatever for or against City and shall hold harmless and defend the City of Hermosa Beach from and against any and all obligations, claims, liens, or causes of actions, arising out of or related to Contractor's services hereunder. Contractor shall file and maintain a file with the City at all -- times during the term of this Agreement, a copy or certificate of general liability insurance for bodily injury and property damage protecting Contractor in amounts not less than $500,000.00 for Injuries to one person, $1,000,000.00 for injuries to more than • one person and $100,000.00 for property damage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled without thirty (30) days' prior written 2 notice to City, shall name the City and its officers and em- ployees as additional insured, and shall include all automobiles utilized by Contractor's personnel in the performance of this Agreement. 4. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by Con- tractor, in whole or in part, without the prior consent of City. 5. Termination. This agreement may be cancelled by City at any time without penalty upon thirty (30) days' written notice. In the event of termination without fault of Contractor, City shall pay Contractor for all services rendered prior to date of termination, and such payment shall be in full satisfaction of all services rendered hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the within Agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ATTEST: City Clerk --- APPROVED AS ORM: j CONTRACTOR By ty Attorney 4/7/87/v By Exhibit B CITY OF HERMOSA 13hAC;H CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU FY88-89 SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM • • PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER: PROGRAM AREA: Light Conversion and New Installation CIP 85-201 105-401-8201-4201 Street Lightinq Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: WORK PROPOSED: This project proposes the installation, upgrading and con- version to high pressure sodium lights throughout the City. Work is to be performed by City crews. V11 1 \.i1 - • BUDGET SCHEDULE FUND No. COI 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 Col 6 Col 7 EXPENDED EST'ED EST'ED TOTAL PROJECT ELEMENTS BUDGET THRU THRU FY86-87 PROJECT 1 FY86-872/28/876/30/87BALANCEI FT87-88FY88-891 BUDGET 1 1 11 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 • I-751.0001_91.2551-71.,1491_-.1,3991_ .Q,4491 I 5.001 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I --------I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I• pM-«-...- ««-« SUBTOTAL 1-7_54441--2►25�1-JLZO41---3.3DD1- Q•QDDI IJ.Z .ODDI ...........'1..509.D.«2.50Q.......A...S.0011...----...L2.5DA. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS. SPECS & ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS CONTINGENCY ' TOTAL EXPENDITURE FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCES 105 ILighting Fund 82.500 9,955 79.200 3.300 55.000 137.500 O***************** FUNDING DISTRIBUTION ************** TOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 82,5001 9.9551 79.2001 3.3001 55.0001 1137.5001 1 �«• TOTAL FUNDING««.............«.«««.•••MI• ....................«...«...... 82.500 9.955 79.200 3.300 55.000 IILIl1VIVJH LJL'1-1`,11 • • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU FY88-89 SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM • PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER: PROGRAM AREA: Light Conversion and New Installation CIP 85-201 105-401-8201-4201 Street Lighting Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: WORK PROPOSED: This project proposes the installation, upgrading and con- version to high pressure sodium lights throughout the City. Work is to be performed by City crews. • BUDGET SCHEDULE 137.500 Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 Col 6 Col 7 PROJECT ELEMENTS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS. SPECS & ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS SUBTOTAL MOON CONTINGENCY TOTAL EXPENDITURE FUNDING SCHEDULE FUND N0. FUNDING SOURCES EXPENDED EST'ED EST'ED - BUDGET THRU THRU FY86-87 FY86-87 2/28/87 6/30/87 BALANCE FY87-88 FY88-89 I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I-751.0091_ 9,9551_71,7401_ 1049/.30.338.1 1 TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET I I 1 1 1102,6381 1 1- 102 638 • 1...QQ91---`9►2r351_JLZQ41-30,9381 82,500 9.955 79.200 3.300 35,938 102,638 ****************** FUNDING DISTRIBUTION ************** 1 1 1 1 1 1 105 ILightinq Fund 82.5001 9.9551 79.2001 3.3001 35,5381 ...0.1•.01. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 • TOTAL FUNDING 115,138 82.500 9.955 79.200 ; 3.300 35.938 115,138 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU FY88-89 SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER: PROGRAM AREA: Pier Lighting Repairs CIP 85-203 105-401-8203-4201 Street Lighting Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: WORK PROPOSED: Requires electrical grounding of Pier infra -structure (from railing to ocean floor) beforelight fixtures can be upgraded. Grounding system (including unique engineering design drawings and possible underwater construction) should be accomplished in FY86-87. Light standards may!then be purchased and installed in Summer, 1987. BUDGET SCHEDULE Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col S .Col 6 Col 7 PROJECT ELEMENTS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EXPENDED EST'ED EST'ED _ TOTAL BUDGET TIIRU TNRU FY86-87 PROJECT FY86-87 2/28/87 6/30/87 BALANCE FY87-88 FY88-89 BUDGET 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 L0001 01 1.0001 01 01 0 1 000 PLANS. SPECS & ESTIMATES 2 000 I. ._1.--I 1_ 1510001 2,0001 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY ' 01 2.0001 01 01 01__ 2,000 01 __510001.10,0001 _10 9001------- 91.11,000 01 2,0001------- 01 2,0001 01 2,000 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I. 20,0901 ....... 01_ 10,0001_ 1030001_ 1230001-------01-20y90n -«-..A- —A —.UDR TOTAL EXPENDITURE 22.000 0 11,000 11.000 13.200 0 21.200 FUNDING SCHEDULE FUND NO. • FUNDING SOURCES 105 1Lighting Fund ....-� TOTAL FUNDING 22,000 CITY O1= HERIVIOSA BEACH FUNDING DISTRIBUTION ************** TOTAL I I 1 1 11,0001 11.000 13,200 1 21.200 I I 0 11,000 .11,000 13,200 • • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU FY88-89 SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER: PROGRAM AREA: Pier Lighting Repairs CIP 85-203 105-401-8203-4201 Street Lighting Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: WORK PROPOSED: Requires electrical groundingof Pier infra -structure (from railing to ocean floor) beforelight fixtures can be upgraded. Grounding system (including unique engineering design drawings and possible underwater construction) should be accomplished in FY86-87. Light standards may,then be purchased and installed in Sumner, 1987. FUND NO. BUDGET SCHEDULE 21.200 Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 3 •Col 6 COI 7 EXPENDED EST'ED EST'ED PROJECT ELEMENTS BUDGET THRU TIIRU FY86-87 FY86-87 2/28/87 6/30/87 BALANCE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 1 1 000 0 1,000 1----1---1 I I 01 PLANS. SPECS & ESTIMATES 2 0000 2,000 0 1----1---I I I I. 15,0001 " 0 50001- 100001 27329.1 1_1,0001 01__2,0001-------01-- 21200.1 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS TOTAL PROJECT FY87-88 FY88-89 BUDGET 1 1 01 01_ 1,200 01 01__ 21000 012.A.W t 4,.24 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 t SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY TOTAL EXPENDITURE FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCES 105 1 Lighting Fund 1.29.429.91 01_ 1030001_ 1030001_29{5291 01_39,529 2 DDA .. 2.4113 -------A--� 733 IINIMOIP001•7 WNW. TOTAL FUNDING 22.000 0 11,000 11.000 32,262 . 0 43.262 ****************** I I 22,000 01 22,000 1 FUNDING DISTRIBUTION **** I I I 11.0001 11.0001 32,2621 0 11.000z 11.000 32,262 TOTAL 1 1_43,262. 1 1 1 43,262 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME ; Pier Grounding Repairs Z LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : mossiossocom ACTUAL SCHEDULE : ACCOUNT NUMBER X : 100% COMPLETE 1 1 1 1 PR 1 MAY 1 JUN 1 JUL 1 AUG 1 SEP 1 OCT 1 NOV I DEC JAN FEB MAR A 1 1 1 1 I I TASKS 1 � � L ----I-- 1 1 1 "lfnilll�il Final design approval before advertising *•-••-- for construction 1 1 t .,—._—t 1 1 I I III' --1 I I Prepare advertisement & set bid opening 1 date 1 1 I. - 1 1 1 1 '�Im`rn- Advertising period 1 g'``":`,1:3 gi I 1 (issue addendums as necessary) 1 1 1 1......... --I 1 1 1 Accept sealed bids & public bid opening IA 121 I 1 1 1 1...........4 1 1 1 1 1 Illlur'111f� Review bids I =-- I 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 >� I Award contract Olt 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Sign contract (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) CIP 85-203 1 I - fill 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 Preconstruction meeting procedure • Issue Notice to Proceed" 1 1�rli 1 1 1 1 1— —1 1 1 1 „ , I---.--1IIIIt111m1fni�lr-1 1 1 I 1 1 I Construction Period 1 1--- 1 1 1 Monitor progress & maintain records miiii1tEI1111111E1 Wf I I 1 1 ment and I 1 ffimilrrllTFI1IlirVTf' 1 1 1 1 1 1 Progress pa y change order procedure I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1--- — 1 1 ---•gym Acceptance of work as complete ` 1 1---• , 1 ITS---- I 1 1 1 I 1 Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" 1 1 1---- -1 1 11I I, 1 I 1 1 I Retention Payment 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 Project close out I Ir► 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • February 2, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 9, 1988 DOWNTOWN SIDEWALK CLEANING Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. authorize the second downtown sidewalk cleaning. Background: At the City Council meeting on August 11, 1987, City Council appropriated $5,390 from State Gas Tax and transferred $5,390 from Prospective Expenditures to the Street Maintenance Division, Contract Services Private, for the provision of sidewalk cleaning. The first $5,390 was used for the first cleaning. The second cleaning requires approval of City Council. In August 1987 the contract was awarded to A-1 Steam Cleaning and the sidewalks were cleaned in August 1987. Prior to that the work was last performed by contract in 1986. The Public Works Department crews performed downtown sidewalk area cleaning annually, but stopped cleaning this area in 1984. Analysis: A map (see attached) has been prepared and the square footage of sidewalk to be cleaned has been tabulated. The scope of work is to clean concrete areas shown on the map to remove grime, grease, gum, soil, etc. The three (3) vendors contacted who provide this service are: Bob Walker, A-1 Steam Cleaning: Approx. $0.0539 per sf $4,900 J. C. Hydro Blasting: Approx. $0.09 per sf $8,300 Specialty Maintenance: Approx. $0.0495 per sf $4,500 (* If services are performed four to six weeks after Council approval, this price will be adjusted by contractor to $3,500 (approx.$0.0385 per square foot.) Cost ranges from $0.0495 per square foot to $0.09 per square foot for this service. If a second cleaning is authorized by City Council the low bidder, Specialty Maintenance will perform this service. When to Schedule Cleaning It is recommended that the cleaning be performed during the month of April. 1 • • Fiscal Impact: The City Council action on August 11, 1987 authorized the transfer from Prospective Expenditures to the Street Maintenance Division, Contract Private Services for the second cleaning. Hence, no additional appropriation is neseccary. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Eliminate the project. Respectfully submitted, ,r' t /2 Gary eaton Engineering Technician Concur: Anthony Antich Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Public Works Finance Administrator dssc/v Attachments: (4) — • . . • . : .. ...............r. —,•-•...........-•"•°rk-'"e7-,:os---"!•-•iii‘:',....'"P...i.:......."-:;•-i•......Li'L;;.' .:;..1".-....177:.:; :1 ••• -2_ Z\ 154 """t,--...7..1-..A...s...:4a# k•Irb: ',';$•••*%:' •••••=ti*tr .• . . .• ••-•••••-......, .4 ,;-•• • :."0.4,........;),..,.. ...t..--:44..rsv'.. . ..1..*„.n.v1........1:.„...: vitt/ ,......, 04, .i.....,.......,,‘•:e:.- . .. . ... • .'• • ....'s..* • .• .1..:.,"‘•-zi.vn.ii;,,,s..-••'%,....17.*:r. ,°.,*•••.**%,'. '4.!....,;:-;-.'•:"""".- _ --- ---. ... - • . • • • 0".. • • • t • • 1"*. • • •• • • • ., , • • ,. 411 vas PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SIDEWALK CLEANING 1 I I 1 I . ...1 I I SIDEWALK ADDITIONS STREET LOCATED ON AVERAGE AVERAGE GROSS AREA OR NET AREA COMMENTS FROM/TO N/S/E'W/ SIDE LENGTH WIDTH• (SQ. FEET) DEDUCTIONS (SQ. FEET) STRAND 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I center 14th to s/s 11th 8841 241 212161 01 212161 I I 1 I I 1 I I I s/s 11th to center 10th 240 20 4800 0 4800 1 I I I 1 I I I HERMOSA AVENUE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14th to 13th west 204 ' 8 1632 -36 15963 planter wells I 1 •I I 1 I I I 13th to Pier Avenue west 204 9 1836 -48 1788 4 planter wells 1 1 1 1 1 Pier to 11th west 225 9 2025 -48 19774 planter wells I 1 1 1 I 1 1 11th to 10th west 207 9 1863 -48 18154 planter wells I I 1 1 1 I I 1 10th to Pier Avenue east 496 9 4464 -84 4380 7 planter wells I I I I 1 I- I I Pier Ave to 14th St east 500 10 5000 120 4880 10 planter well 1 I 1 I I I I 1 10TH STREET I I I I I I I I Palm to Hermosa Ave north 100 9.5 950 950 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 11TH STREET I I 1 1 I I I I Beach Or to Strand north 90 10 . 900 900 I I 1 I I 1 I I Beach Dr to Strand south 90 10 : 900 900 I I I I I I I I Hermosa to Beach Dr south 225 10 ' 2250 2250 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I Hermosa to Beach Dr south 238 10 2380 252 2632 I I I I I I I 1 Beach Dr to Strand north 80 14.5 ' 1160 170 133Q I I 1 I I -la I I 13TH STREET • • 'UBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SIDEWALK CLEANING. •r • I I I-- 1I SIDEWALK I 1 I STREET LOCATED ON AVERAGE ADDITIONS: EETO Ni LOCATE SIDENAVERAGE GROSS AREA OR NET AREA COMMENTS ._-:---=s== __,_••LENGTH WIDTH (SQ. FEET) DEDUCTIONS (SQ. FEET) 14TH STREET i ! I I. a I 1 Palm to Hermosa Ave I I I 1 south 100 15 1 1 1 1500 8AR0 I I 1 j_--1 1 1 1500 I I • Pier Ave to 96 ft northerly 1 east I I I 1 96 I I I 1 1 6 576 576 Pier. Ave to 78 ft northerly west I 1 I I 1 I I 78 6. 468 468 Pier Ave to 130 Ft southerly west I I '1 1 1 130 6 • 780 I I MONTEREY I 1 I 1___i 780 1 1 1 1 Pier Ave to 40 ft southerly 1 west I I 40 I I 1 I 1 1 6 240 240 Pier Ave to 33 Ft northerly east I I 1 I 1 33 6 198 1 1 1 I I 198 MANHATTAN AVE 1 I I I Pier Ave to 105 ft northerly I east 1 I 1 105 I I 1 I • I 1 d 630 630 PIER AVE 1 1 1 1 1 I Hermosa Ave to Monterey I south I 1 I 540 1 1 1 I 1 1 10 5400 5400 Hermosa Ave to Monterey north I I I I 1 I 1 457 10 4570 4570 Monterey to Valley I 1 I I 1 1 south 810 10 8100 1 I- 1 1 8100 Monterey to Valley north 839 10 8390 8390 Hermosa to Strand 1 I 1 1 1 1 south 430 9.5 4085 -260 1 1 3825 Planters Hermosa to Strand north I 1 1 1 1 1 438 9.5 4161 -260 3901 Planters X -walk btwn Hermosa & Strand 1 1 1 1 1 I TOTAL 1 1 1 01 9(101 900 1 Crosswalk 90474 418 90892 0 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P9 L SE AREA TO BE CLEANED • • • • LOPE I/4"= I' •• • • •« L� 1• •_ • • y . • • •• . •= • • • •• • • •� • •• • • • // COMPACTED EARTH BASE -r • • .A•-".•.. • •.. t • • • • 24 A•• • • •Si • .• • •• • • • • • :4 • •:.A- • • •• .A • ••" • •••••A •• � • . Z ••.. ••fi February 3, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council February 9, 1988 HOPE CHAPEL LEASE RECOMMENDATION The Community Resources Advisory Commission recommends that City Council approve the attached lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Hope Chapel for Room 13 in the Community Center. BACKGROUND Hope Chapel has been a user of the Community Center for the past two years. ANALYSIS The attached lease is standard. The major conditions of the lease are: 1. Lease rate of $.67 sq. ft. which is in accordance with policy. 2. Lease term is one (1) year. 2P23 Alana M. Mastrian Acting City Manager Respectfully submitted, Mary Dept ey, Ac ing Director ommunity Resources ed for Fiscal Impact �,%4 'de m-/;)‘,.) Viki Co eland Finance Administrator HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 9th day of February 19 88 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and Hope Chapel (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certair, provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of One (1) year commencing on the 9th day of February ,1988 , and ending on the 31st day of January ,19 89 . 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 13 (1,288 al. ft) Community Center 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac- cording to the following. schedule: Feb. 9 1988 throuh June 30. 1988 ($.67 s . ft.) throu:h Januar 1 19:9 .70 per sq. ft. $902 per month. Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 1 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 3. All window dressing shall be approved by the City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources. 4. See attached addendum. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes:, meeting room And for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be. filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional 2 Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee promises to hold the City harmless from any claims, causes of actions or damages of any nature whatever arising from Lessee's use of the premises and will pay the City any monies to which the City may become obli- gated because of Lessee's use of the premises. Lessee shall, if so instructed by the City, cause any occupants of the premises to execute a document in a form prepared by the City 3 wherein that occupant shall expressly waive any right of ac- tion against the City for damages for any injury sustained because of Lessee's use of the premises. 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: HOPE CHAPEL 2420 Pacific Coast Hwy. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 213 37 -HOPE Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TE: By CI Y CLERK CITY ATTORNEY LESSEE: Pastor, Hope Chapel ADDENDUM HOPE CHAPEL The City of Hermosa Beach shall have final approval of all remodel work done in Room 13 of the Community Center prior to any work commencing. Both the Building and Public Works departments shall approve all remodelling plans. The City of Hermosa Beach shall be responsible for capping off all gas and electrical lines installed in the islands located in the middle of the room; shall paint the east wall and cabinets in room 13; and replace all missing cupboard doors. The counters and sinks on the south wall shall remain. 6 February 2, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 9, 1988 ACCEPTANCE OF INSPECTION AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES AS COMPLETE, SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT TARGET AREA 2, CIP 85-402 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. accept as complete the inspection and contract administration services completed by ASL Consulting Engineers for the Sanitary Sewer Replacement, Target Area 2, CIP 85-402, and 2. transfer $77,825 excess funds from CIP 85-402 to CIP 87-405. Background: This item is before City Council for the purpose of accepting the inspection work as complete and a final accounting of expenditures for CIP 85-402. CIP 85-402 replaced the sanitary sewer lines at the following locations: Valley Drive from 17th Street to 8th Street, abandoned 17th Street (across the school district property); Corona St. from Aviation Blvd. to Prospect Avenue. A total of approximately 3,800 lineal feet of 6", 8", 10" and 15" sanitary sewer line was rehabilitated. At the May 12, 1987 meeting, City Council approved and authorized the Mayor to sign an agreement with ASL Consulting Engineers for inspection and administration services for CIP 85-402 for a cost not to exceed $42,680. At the January 12, 1988, City Council meeting, Council took formal action to accept as complete the work completed by Christeve Corporation for Sanitary Sewer Replacement, Target Area 2, CIP 85-402. Analysis: This analysis is broken into the following: a) Inspection and Contract Administration Services b) .Fiscal Impact c) Final Project Cost d) Summary a) Inspection and Contract Administration Services All inspection and contract administration services are complete to the satisfaction of staff. The professional services were completed within budget (see Fiscal Impact). The inspection was completed within the 120 days allowed in the contract to complete construction. to b) Fiscal Impact: Inspection and Contract Administration Service ASL Consulting Engineers Contract Amount (NTE) Total Cost $42,680.00 34,281.86 Contract Cost Savings to City $ 8,398.14 ASL Consulting Engineers completed their work below budget for a total contract cost savings to the City of $8,398.14. c) Final Project Cost FY 87-88 Final Accounting CIP 85-402 Contract Cost Not to Exceed Design: Construction: $580,718 Final Cost Total Savings Funding To City Source N/A (Paid prior to FY 87-88) $538,395 $42,323 Sewer Fund Inspection: $ 42,680 $ 34,282 8,398 Contingency: 29,553 2,449 27,164 TOTAL: $652,951 $575,126 $77,825 Total Savings to City $77,825 same same Staff recommends that these excess funds be transferred from CIP 85-402 to CIP 87-405 for sanitary sewer replacement for the next target area currently in design by Harris & Associates. Please See Exhibit A for existing and proposed budgets for CIP 85-402 and CIP 87-405. d) Summary The total project cost is as follows: Project Element Percent Design Construction Inspection Contingency 3% 91% 6% Less than 1% Total Cost of Project Amount $ 18,500 (paid prior to 538,395 FY 87-88) 34,282 2,449 $593,626 This results in a unit cost of approximately $156 per lineal foot. Respect ubmitted, eborah M. urphy Assistant Engineer Concur: Alana Mastrian Acting City Manager Attachments: Exhibit A - Budgets: com/v 3 Concur: Ant ony Antich Director of Publ c Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator CIP 85-402 & 85-405 Exhibit A CI'T'Y OF HbKiIVIUSA titAUII - • • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU FY88-89 SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Replacement of Pipe between MH 602 - 610, 'ROJECT NAME: MH 722 - 804 and MH 818 - 822 'ROJECT NUMBER: CIP 85-402 ,000UNT NUMBER: 160-401-8402-4201 'ROGRAM AREA: Sanitary Sewer Improvements 'ROJE4T DESCRIPTION: 4ORK PROPOSED: 'his project proposes the replacement of approximately 1.000 feet of concrete sewer pipe, currently operating )eyond capacity, and identified a No. 1 priority by the iantina & Thompson Sewer Report. Construction bids are due in April, 1987, and construction is anticipated to begin in late June, 1987. 'TOTE: Construction was originally anticipated to begin in Summer, 1986. However, due to poor bidders response, pro- ject has been postponed one year. BUDGET SCHEDULE Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 Col 6 Col 7 EXPENDED EST'ED EST'ED TOTAL PROJECT ELEMENTS BUDGET THRU THRU 1 FY86 871 2/28/87 6/30/87 BALANCEBPROJECT6-87 FY87-881 FY88-891 BUDGET) PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 1 1 I I I I ( I PLANS. SPECS & ESTIMATES 1 0001._1_,100/ 01 .140 I____1_I I I ---1 I CONSTRUCTION 329 200 0 329 200 540 592 041105.1?, 1229.&291* --1---I I I---1 11--1---1 INSPECTION 33.t.21291 0 33 00n� 53.000 531000 I---1---1 I 1----1 -I 1 1--- 1 OTHER DIRECT COSTS I 1 I ( I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 1---1111-1 SUBTOTAL 136312201 1__�•,1441382..1441593L5921 159416921 CONTINGENCY__ 36.220 0 36.220..59.359....... 59.359 654,051 TOTAL EXPENDITURE 398.420 1.100 398.320 652,95 FUNDING SCHEDULE FUND 110. FUNDING SOURCES ***********A***A** FUNDING DISTRIBUTION ************** TOTAL I I I I I I 1 I 160 1Sewer Fund 139814201 01__1,1001397,3201652.9511 1654`0511 1 1 1 I I 1 • I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1- --1 1 I I --------I 1 1 1 l 1 «... • ' TOTAL FUNDING 398,420 0. 1,100 397,320 652,951 654,051 • LCI 1 Y 01 I1t1iMU M btHt.n • • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU FY88-89 SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM • • • • Replacement of Pipe between MH 602 - 610, PROJECT NAME: MH 722 - 804 and MH 818 - 822 PROJECT NUMBER: CIP 85-402 ACCOUNT NUMBER: 160-401-8402-4201 PROGRAM AREA: Sanitary Sewer Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: WORK PROPOSED: This project proposes the replacement of approximately 4,000 feet of concrete sewer pipe. currently operating beyond capacity, and identified a No. 1 priority by the.. Santana & Thompson Sewer Report. Construction bids are due in April, 1987, and construction is anticipated to begin in late June; 1987. NOTE: Construction was originally anticipated to begin in Summer, 1986. However, due to poor bidders response. pro- ,ject has been postponed one year. • BUDGET SCHEDULE Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 Col 6 Col 7 EXPENDED EST'ED EST'EOTOTAL PROJECT ELEMENTS BUDGET FY86872/28/876/30/87BALANCEFY87-88FT88-89BUDGET 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 TI PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING I- --1111-I -I 1 I -I I I PLANS. SPECS & ESTIMATES I-_ 1 L000I------.I__ ti -MI' 01 1 (-- 1.1401 CONSTRUCTION 329 200 01.32aa 00 538 395 1_-11--1--------I 1.32 1311.1251 038, 95. I. 3310001 . . 1 01.j31,2001 34,2821 1-3412821 I I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I - -II I .1 1 I• INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS ............. SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY ' 1363,2201 111QQ136�,1001572,67-1 5737171 -�-- 36.220 _ 0 36.220 TOTAL EXPENDITURE FUNDING SCHEDULE 398.420 1.100 398.320 575,126 576,226 FUND �.****AAA*+****** **** TOTAL , F0. 1 FUNDING SOURCES FUNDING DISTRIBUTION 160 1Sewer Fund 139814201 01__11100139713201575.126• 576.2261 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1--------I 1 I 1 1 �.._1 1 1_-----__I 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL FUNDING 398,420 0. 1,100 397,320 575,126 576,226 • CITY OF HEHIVIUSA BEACH • • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU FY88-88 SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER: PROGRAM AREA: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rgtla43ement and Upsizing of Sanitary Sewer Lines BUDGET SCHEDULE Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 Col 6 Col 7 EIP11-105 EXPENDED EST'ED EST'ED TOTAL PROJECT ELEMENTS BUDGET THRU THRU F786-87 PROJECT 160-401-8405-4201 FY86-87 2/28/87 6130/87 BALANCE FY87-88 FY88-89 BUDGET Sanitary Sewer Improvements PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING I I I I I I I I WORK PROPOSED: Preparation of plans and specifications leading to construction Ind completion of deficiencies identified by the Santana & Thompson Sewer Analysis as Priority No. 1. PLANS, SPECS & CONSTRUCTION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ESTIMATES 33 000 0 33 1---.L---I I 1-3.14-000--1.4040.00-91.44.9991---113,9po INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY 13661.0001 I 01 366X0001404,0001 404,049( 1 .1¢¢,QpO OMNI 1 41- 3649991.-4-4,091.-412,091...110.9p0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1---1111-1 1 1 I' 435,000 1 OI 4 35 ,4091484,4091 4$4.4491 i.395,9p0 TOTAL EXPENDITURE 478,800 f 0 478.800 528.000 528.000 1.534.800 FUNDING SCHEDULE FUND NO. FUNDING SOURCES *****k************ FUNDING DISTRIBUTION ************** TOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 160 I Sewer Fund 1300.8401 I 1300.8401528.0001 528.0001 1.356.80 1 Unfunded1177.9601 1 1177.9601 • 1 I 177.90 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL FUNDING «.0...0.0.0..«.01•04•«« . ................ 478.800 478.800 528.000 528.000 1.534.800 U I• Y UI- I-ItiIVIUSA L$tML 1-1 • • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU FY88-89 .SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM • • PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER: PROGRAM AREA: CRC pla4eement and Upsizing of Sanitary Sewer Lines GIPy4-105 160-401-8405-4201 Sanitary Sewer Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: WORK PROPOSED: Preparation of plans and specifications leading to construction and completion of deficiencies identified by the Santana & Thompson Sewer Analysis as Priority No. 1. BUDGET SCHEDULE Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 Col 6 Col 7 EXPENDED EST'ED EST'ED TOTAL PROJECT ELEMENTS BUDGET THRU THRU FY86-87 PROJECT FY86-87 2/28/87 6130/87 BALANCE FY87-88 F788-89 BUDGET PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PLANS, SPECS & ESTIMATES( 33 000 1 0 33 000 40 000 40 0001 13 1 I ----1.---I 1 I----1.-- 1---1.- I----•- -1---1 ,OC CONSTRUCTION 366 000 I-- I 0 366 000 477•-,825 400 0 0 1,243,82 I.._ -1..__I -1.---11111 =t,_9 1_ 361.0001 I 01_ 3¢X0001_ 44X991.44,4991...115.9p 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS SUBTOTAL 435 000 0 435 000 557 825 480 049 1 472 825 I ----1.---I I 1--1. - I--1----1-11.1 I-'----••� ...��.........Q . 43.60D . 41i.00D _ 4a.00D _.�39.BD TOTAL EXPENDITURE 478,800 *r 0 478,800 605,825 528,000 1,612,625 CONTINCENCY FUNDING SCHEDULE FUND NO.I FUNDING SOURCES 160 (Sewer Fund Unfunded *****************i II I FUNDING DISTRIBUTION TOTAL 1 1300.8401605.825.1 528.00011,434,5 66 • I177.960I 1 1 177.9p I 1 1300,8401 I 1177,960, 1 1 1 1 1---1111-1 TOTAL FUNDING 478,800 478,800 6.05,825 528400 1.612.625 February 1, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 9, 1988 RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH PARKING ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF THE STREET, FOR VARIOUS STREETS BETWEEN PROSPECT AVENUE AND ARDMORE AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution (Exhibit A) to establish parking on opposite sides of the street during sweeping hours for the following streets: Between Ardmore Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street 1st Place, 4th Street 5th Street Between Prospect Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street 6th Street 8th Place 10th Street 17th Street Other 5th Street 8th Street, 9th Street 16th Street Ocean Street (Aviation Blvd. to 15th Street) Mira Street (16th Street to 15th Street) Lyndon Street (Monterey Blvd. to Palm Drive) Loma Drive (Pier Avenue to 6th Street) 6th Street (Monterey Blvd. to Cypress Avenue) BACKGROUND: At the March 25, 1986, City Council meeting, staff was directed to implement a three (3) month experiment to allow parking on the opposite side of the street on street sweeping days on 2nd, 3rd and 7th Streets. Residents were notified of the experiment, signage was installed and the experiment was "officially" implemented on July 7, 1986. At the conclusion of the three (3) month period, a questionnaire (Exhibit B) was distributed to all affected residents. Because of the low response rate, staff attempted to personally contact each resident to obtain the following results regarding the experimental parking conditions: 55% of the residents were in favor, 3% were opposed and 42% did not respond. On August 25, 1987, City Council requested additional information regarding: M 1) Whether or not any formal action was taken to establish parking on the opposite sides of the street during street sweeping hours of select streets in Hermosa Beach. 2) Which particular streets might be condidates for another target area for this project. On September 1, 1987, City Council directed staff to investigate potential additional streets which would benefit from establishing parking on the opposite side during street sweeping hours as listed below: Between Ardmore and Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street 2nd Street 4th Street 8th Street 1st Place 3rd Street 5th Street 21st Street Between Prospect Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street (PCH -Barney Ct) 6th Street 8th Place 10th Street 17th Street Other 5th Street 8th Street 9th Street 16th Street Ocean Street (Aviation to 15th Street) Mira Street (from 16th Street to 15th Street) Lyndon Street (Monterey Blvd. to Palm) Loma Drive (Pier Avenue to 6th Street) 6th Street (Monterey to Cypress) Valley Drive (from the north City boundary to the south boundary) Ardmore Avenue (north City boundary to the south City boundary) ANALYSIS: A field investigation was conducted and attached are the conclusions for each street regarding parking on opposite sides of the street on street sweeping days (Exhibit B). Streets which could have parking on the opposite side of the street during street sweeping days are indicated by "yes". Between Ardmore and Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street Yes 1st Place yes 2nd Street No 3rd Street Already exists 4th Street Yes 5th Street Yes 8th Street No 21st Street No 2 Between Prospect Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway 1st Street (PCH -Barney Ct.) Yes 5th Street Yes 6th Street Yes 8th Street Yes 8th Place Yes 9th Street Yes 10th Street Yes 16th Street Yes 17th Street Yes (west of "jog") Other Ocean Street (Aviation to 15th Street) Yes Mira Street Yes Lyndon Street (Monterey Blvd. to Palm Yes Loma Drive (Pier Avenue to 6th Street) Yes 6th Street (Monterey to Cypress) Yes Valley Drive No Ardmore Drive No Staff recommends that the parking proposal be implemented and maintained on a three month trial basis basis for the streets marked "yes" and questionnaires mailed to all affected residents. Other Alternatives: The alternatives mentioned below were previously listed in the agenda item for the September 8, 1987 regular City Council meeting. Other alternatives available to Council include the following suggestions from the affected residents: 1. Eliminate the "hours" restrictions to consider entire street sweeping "days": For example, the sign would read - "No Parking Wednesday" rather than "No Parking Wednesday 10 - 2". Analysis: Staff does not endorse this alternative, as it would force the transistion period (residents moving their vehicles from one side of the street to the other) to become effective 12:00 midnight. 2. Extend the hours for the convenience of working residents: For example, the sign would read - "No Parking Wednesday 8-5", rather than "No Parking Wednesday 10-2". Analysis: While this suggestion initially appeared promising, staff does not endorse this alternative for the following reasons: a) Determining "working hours" for the convenience of all would be difficult. Residents leave for and return from work at different times. Perhaps the most conservative hours would be 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.; however, this would cause the "transition period" (where vehicles are likely to be parked on both sides of the street) to be in the evening. The reduced visibility in the evening poses additio'1 safety concerns. b) The chance of residents returning home late from work (due to traffic, etc.) to move their vehicles parked on the street is likely. Consequently, the likelihood of impeded traffic flow is increased. c) Most of the "working residents" who would benefit from these extended hours drive their vehicles to work. 3. Implement a one hour transition period: For example, the north side of the street might read - "No Parking Wednesday 10 - 2" and on the south side - "Parking Permitted Wednesday 9 - 3". Analysis: Residents have expressed that this would allow them a '`grace period" to move their vehicles. Staff does not endorse this suggestion because of the inherent safety concerns and likelihood of impeding traffic flow. 4. No change. Leave it the way it was. Respectfully submitted, Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer Concur: 0.7 Alana M. Mastrian Acting City Manager Concur: az44 Antony Antich Director of Public Works Concur: Jo Noon General Services Director 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. N.S. 2435 AS AMENDED BY REVISING THERETO NO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN SECTIONS OF 1ST STREET, 1ST PLACE, 4TH STREET, 5TH STREET, 6TH STREET, 8TH STREET, 8TH PLACE, 9TH STREET, 10TH STREET, 16TH STREET, 17TH STREET, OCEAN STREET, MIRA STREET, LYNDON STREET AND LOMA DRIVE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Resolution No. N.S. 2435 as amended shall be and is hereby further amended by revising the following subsection to Section 4 "No Parking Areas". SECTION 4.38a FIRST STREET: Ardmore Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway, north side only, excluding from 75 feet east of Ardmore to 100 feet west of PHC on Thursdays from the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. SECTION 4.38c FIRST STREET: east of Pacific Coast Highway to Barney Court south side only, excluding from 120 feet east of Pacific Coast Highway to 50 feet west of Barney Court on Wednesdays from the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. SECTION 4.37 FIRST PLACE: Ardmore Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway, north side only, excluding Thursdays from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. SECTION 4.42b FOURTH STREET: Ardmore Avenue to Pacifi Coast Highway, south side only, excluding from 100 feet east of Ardmore to 100 feet west of Pacific Coast Highway on Thursdays from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 4.36a FIFTH STREET: Ardmore Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway, south side only, excluding from 75 feet east of Ardmore to 100 feet west of Pacific Coast Highway on Wednesdays from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. SECTION 4.36b FIFTH STREET: Pacific Coast Highway to Prospect Avenue, south side only, excluding Thursdays from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. SECTION 4.105b SIXTH STREET: Cypress Avenue to Monterey Boulevard, south side only, excluding from Loma Drive Monterey Blvd. on Thursdays from the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 2:0 p.m. SECTION 4.105c SIXTH STREET: Pacific Coast Highway Prospect Avenue, south side only, excluding from 75 feet east Pacific Coast Highway to 75 feet west of Prospect Avenue on Wednesdays from the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. t SECTION 4.27d EIGHTH STREET: Pacific Coast Highway to Prospect Avenue, north side only, excluding approximately 150 feet east of Pacific Coast Highway to 150 feet west of Prospect Avenue on Thursdays from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. SECTION 4.26c EIGHTH PLACE: Pacific Coast Highway to Prospect Avenue, south side only, excluding Thursdays from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. SECTION 4.77a NINTH STREET: Pacific Coast Highway to Prospect Avenue, south side only, excluding from Pacific Coast 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Highway to 75 feet west of Owosso Avenue on Wednesdays from the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. SECTION 4.111 TENTH STREET: Ardmore Avenue to Prospect Avenue, south side only, excluding 150 feet east of Pacific Coast Highway to Prospect Avenue on Thursdays from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. SECTION 4.103b SIXTEENTH STREET: Pacific Coast Highway to Prospect Avenue, south side only, excluding from 150 feet east of Pacific Coast Highway to Prospect Avenue on Mondays from the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. SECTION 4.95 SEVENTEENTH STREET: Pacific Coast Highway to Prospect Avenue, south side only, excluding from 25 feet east of Pacific Coast Highway to 25 feet west of the "jog" and from 25 feet east of the "jog" to Prospect Avenue on Tuesdays from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. SECTION 4.78- OCEAN DRIVE: Fifteenth Place to Aviation Avenue, east side only, excluding from Fifteenth Place to 50 feet north of Aviation Avenue on Wednesdays from the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. SECTION 4.65 MIRA STREET: West side only, excluding Thursday from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. SECTION 4.63 LYNDON STREET: Monterey Boulevard to Hermosa Avenue, south side only, excluding Thursdays from the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 4.60 LOMA DRIVE: 400 feet north of Pier Avenue to 45 feet north, west side only, excluding Thursdays from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of February, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: , CITY CLERK 'PROVED AS TO FO CITY ATTORNEY RECEIVED 131987 PHI ri77 TO: Anthony Antich, Director of Public Works FROM: Ed Ruzak SUBJECT: Alternate Side Parking on Street Sweeping Days December 10,1987 This memo reflects my field investigation and review of the streets outlined in the September 1, 1987 report to City Council regarding Parking on Opposite Sides of Street During Street Sweeping Hours. STREETS BETWEEN ARDMORE AVENUE AND PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY(PCH) 1ST STREET Yes, alternate side parking can be accommodated except for a distance of 75 feet from the approach to Ardmore and in the commercial area 100 feet from PCH. 1ST PLACE Yes, alternate side parking can be accommodated. Yellow loading zone on the north side from PCH west would remain. 2ND STREET No; centerline stripe would have to be removed. Street is too highly traveled to change patterns. There is no room to accommodate the alternate side parking at the approaches to the PCH signal and at Ardmore. 3RD STREET • Street sweeping signs exist for alternate days on each side of the street. There is no need to enact alternate parking. It is done now. 4TH STREET Yes, except for 100 feet from the approach direction to Ardmore and PCH. It is not wise to park vehicles close to the approach to the intersection nor on the exit leg. Vehicles coming around the corner, i.e. from PCH into third street run the risk of turning right into the parked car lane. Thus a distance away from the intersection must be preserved as "No parking". 5TH STREET Yes, except for 100 feet from the approach to the PCH signal and 75 feet from the Ardmore Stop controlled intersection. The rest of the block could have it installed. 10061 TALBERT AVENUE SUITE 200 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 964.4880 8TH STREET No. The street is too narrow. While driveways can be used to park in legally, it is not desirable on this narrow a street. There is presently "No parking Anytime" throughout the entire length of this section presently. It should remain. 21ST STREET No. Centerline would have to be removed along with raised pavement markings. If allowed in midblock, crossing the centerline would be prevalent. The marking loses all meaning on the street sweeping days. Street is too highly traveled to allow the alternate parking. BETWEEN PROSPECT AVENUE AND PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 1ST STREET(PCH - BARNEY CT.) Yes, but not between 50 feet West of Meyer Court to Barney Ct. due to hill and limited sight distance. There is a proposal to terminate First St.at Barney Court and have the section from Prospect to Barney Court be a circular "U" shaped street. If this is done, the Step signs on Meyer Court can be removed and the alternate parking extended for the entire section from Barney Court to PCH. 5TH STREET Yes, but remove the raised pavement markings on the centerline.. There is sufficient room on this street such that the centerline is not a serious detriment to the alternate pattern. 6TH STREET Yes. Street is wide and can accommodate this parking pattern. Keep parking prohibitions on the approaches and exit legs to Prospect and PCH for 75 feet from intersection. 8TH STREET Yes, it is one way westbound. There is red curb the entire length an both sides. It will have to be removed with this application. There is island channelization 50 feet east of PCH. No Parking Anytime should remain in this section. • 8TH PLACE Yes, except for 150.feet west of Prospect Avenue. There is a crest vertical curve that has restricted sight distance. The alternate parking situation could create problems for vehicles coming over the rise. • 9TH STREET Yes,except on approaches to Owosso Ave. where sight distance is not goad. Also retain existing no parking on approaches and exit to PCH. 10TH STREET Yes. There is a short section east of PCH that should be Na Parking Anytime. This is between PCH and 822 Tenth Street on the south side. 16TH STREET Yes, except for 40 feet west of Prospect in the vicinity of Bonnie Brae. The approach to the stop sign is on an upgrade and sight lines are critical. 17TH STREET • There is the availability of alternate parking in the easternreach of this street,i.e. east of the roadway jog. No parking anytime should remain in the jog section due to the poor sight distance and the downgrade. West of the jog alternate parking can be implemented except for a section 25 feet from the PCH approach and exit. OCEAN DRIVE -AVIATION AVE TO 15TH STREET Yes, despite the narrowness of the street. Do not allow parking in the exit leg approximately 50 feet north and south a'f Aviation. MIRA STREET Yes, very short street. LYNDON STREET -MONTEREY TO PALM DRIVE Yes LOMA DRIVE -PIER AVENUE TO 6TH STREET Yes,except of the northerly approach to Pier Avenue. 6TH STREET -MONTEREY TO CYPRESS Yes, except for 100 feet on the south side from PCH and 70 feet on the approach to Prospect Avenue. VALLEY DRIVE AND ARDMORE AVENUE -ENTIRE LENGTH Nc.. These two major traffic carriers in the City should not be considered. The alternate parking concept should be restricted to residential streets or wide streets where there are parking lanes. Valley and Ardmore do not have the roadway cross section to conveniently accomplish the alternate parking. - 'Difaj d?/4? January 28, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council February 9, 1988 REPORT REGARDING PARKING ENFORCEMENT POLICY PERTAINING TO VEHICLES BLOCKING THE SIDEWALK Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. Background: At your regularly scheduled meeting of January 26, 1987, the City Council directed staff to.submit a report clarifying the department's policy pertaining to vehicles parked on the sidewalk. Our written parking enforcement policy, Section 1 -Responsibility, item 3, states to enforce all "clearly defined violations" observed. Section 3 -General Guidelines, item '2 states Sidewalk Violations -The City Council has directed that "where there is a clearly defined sidewalk and a vehicle is parked so as to not allow 3' for pedestrian access, that vehicle should be cited". The first instruction, stated above, is very clear, it is the officer's responsibility to cite all clearly defined violations that they observe. The second instruction, stated above, is equally as clear. The basis for the second instruction, as stated, is found in the attached minutes from the City Council Meeting of March 13, 1984. We have been following this direction of the Council since that date. Analysis: While it is true that we are a demand/response department i.e. response to complaints, we also deploy personnel to regular enforcement routes. The officers assigned to parking enforcement concentrate their efforts from Pacific Coast Highway west. The officer assigned to animal control is also assigned to cite any parking violations (that he/she observes) east of Pacific Coast Highway. This is because the officer assigned to animal control patrols the whole•city approximately four or five times during a shift. Our statistics indicate that this person so assigned does, in fact, issue parking citations. The officer assigned to animal control, for the last quarter of 1987, wrote a total of 176 parking citations, for the quarter,' Our written policy directs that all officers are to cite any clearly defined violation that they observe, this would include going to and from a complaint/response. The California Vehicle Code, Section 22500F(see attached), prohibits the parking or standing of a vehicle on a sidewalk. It does not specify how much of the vehicle must be parked on the sidewalk. If one observed the letter of the law, two inches could be a citable offense. In March of 1984, when a previous City Council directed us to enforce Section 22500F of the CVC where the parked vehicle will not allow a three foot passage, it is my opinion that they were directing us to follow the spirit/intent of the law, rather than the letter of the law. The City Attorney, at the time, stated that the motion was a reasonable one, at least in the short run. It is very likely that if our officers are passing up vehicles parked on the sidewalk, it is because those vehicles are not encroaching on the three foot passage way. Alternatives: 1. Recind the direction of the previous council and direct staff to follow the letter of the law. 2. Direct staff to deploy more enforcement east of Pacific Coast Highway. JoNoon General Services Director Concur: G%eCe, Alana Mastrian Acting City Manager 2 HERMOSA BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT (continued) The Public Hearing was opened. Speaking were: Wayne Smith, 65 Monterey Boulevard - re South School sale - against large development, wants low density use, asked for careful consideration. Betty Schweisthal, 21 Durado Place, Rolling Hills Estates - Owner and Operator of St. Clare's Preschool - stated she had a new lease for additional classrooms at South School for an infant care center and a family counseling center. Hank Doerfling, 1011 - 2nd Street - urged further communication with the School District. Frances Parker, 521 Loma Drive - advised Council that the revenue from the sale of the school sites could only be used for capital improvements, not books, teacher's salaries, etc - recommends light industrial. The Public Hearing was closed. ACTION - (1) To reject the School District proposal and uphold the decision of the Planning commission; (2) instruct the City Manager to communicate to the Board of Trustees and Superintendent of the Hermosa Beach School District the City Council's interest in a purchase of the entire South School site, the lower playgrounds at Prospect Heights School at Hollowell and Prospect, the Seaview Parkette at 19th and Prospect, for a price not to exceed $3,500,000 (including $100,000 of Z'Berg funds for purchase of Seaview Parkette); and (3) that the City Manager make recommendations regarding potential financing techniques to acquire the school sites. Motion Mayor Brutsch, second Barks AYES - Barks, Schmeltzer, Mayor Brutsch NOES - Webber, Wood PUBLIC HEARING RE ENFORCEMENT POLICY PERTAINING TO VEHICLES BLOCKING THE SIDEWALK AND ALSO TO PERMIT PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF SECOND AND THIRD STREETS BETWEEN PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND PROSPECT. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated March 5, 1984. Supplemental informa- tion - see Written Communications from the Public. The staff report was presented by General Services Director Joan Noon who showed slides of the area under consideration. Fire Chief Simmons stressed the need for enough room for the fire engines to navigate the streets throughout the City and Police Captain Straser indicated the major impact of parking on both sides of the street would be the safety of the children in the area of the parkette. • -6-. Minutes 3-13-84 2ND AND 3RD STREET PARKING (continued) The Public Hearing was cpened. Coming forward to speak were: Roy Palmer, 1909 Bayview - asked Council to address problem City-wide. Alicia Dean, 1122 - 1st Place - stressed need to park in driveway across sidewalk because of ill husband. Steve Cresi, 1148 - 2nd Street - alleged selective enforcement. Tony DeBellis, 629 - 3rd Street - apply standards City-wide and recommended setback building codes be examined. Wayne Smith, 65 Monterey - residential driveways too short so developers can furnish sufficient in -door parking places. Dick Sullivan, 824 - 3rd Street - violations should be cited only on complaint Thomas Anderson, 1144 - 2nd Street - against citing violators and parking on both sides of the street Gene Gennetti, 1025 - 7th Street - suggested policy be established City-wide - his van will not fit in driveway. Don Kissler, 917 - 6th Street - objects to tax to park in your own driveway or in front of it and suggested red -zoning to to alternate parking on both sides of street John Toman, 311 - 27th Street - 65% of City traffic is on 30' wide streets with parking on both sides Dan Johnson, 925 - 3rd Street - new construction on 3rd Street does not have enough setback to open garage doors with car in drive, suggested changing legislation. Rebecca G. Duarte, 929 - 3rd Street - has camper and comatose grandaughter, needs to park in driveway and both sides of street. Bonnie Wolfe, 1212 - 3rd Street - inadequate analysis of problem, wheelchairs safer in street, not in favor of parking on both sides of street. Joe Angeletti, 959 - 2nd Street - has vans thus need for parking on both sides of street. Hank Doerfling, 1011 - 2nd Street street necessary. - Parker Herriott, 224 - 24th Street over the sidewalks. Roger Creighton, 1101 - 2nd Street pedestrians who must have access the blocking of the sidewalks. - parking on both sides of - against allowing parking - sidewalks belong to - fatalities result from The Public Hearing was closed. PROPOSED ACTION - (1) Establish an interim policy, City-wide, that where there is a clearly defined pedestrian access walkway, vehicles blocking the access to a point where a pedestrian cannot safely pass without going into the street, be cited under Section 22500F of the California Vehicle Code; (2) the City 'Attorney to seek an exception to Section 22500F of the California Vehicle Code; and (3) staff to study the feasibility of changing the Building Code for garage setbacks for new construction. Motion'Barks, second Schmeltzer AYES - Barks NOES - Schmeltzer, Webber, Wood, Mayor Brutsch Motion fails. -7- Minutes 3-13-84 • 2ND AND 3RD STREET PARKING (continued) ACTION - Prepare a resolution asking the Planning Commission to review the appropriate ordinances to determine if the setbacks for parking are currently adequate. Motion Schmeltzer, second Barks AYES - Barks, Schmeltzer, Webber, Mayor Brutsch NOES - Wood FURTHER ACTION - To direct appropriate staff to review parking in that instance where there is parking on one side of the street and the need to move on street cleaning day,to allow parking on the other side of the street. Motion Schmeltzer, second Barks AYES - Barks, Schmeltzer, Webber, Wood, Mayor Brutsch NOES - None PROPOSED ACTION - To direct appropriate staff question of reducing the width of streets and size of pedestrian ways so that at some point it would be possible to allow parking on what public right-of-way and allow parking on both street where appropriate. Motion Schmeltzer, second Barks AYES - Barks, Schmeltzer NOES Webber, Wood, Mayor Brutsch Motion fails to review the increase the in the future is now the sides of the General Services Director Noon, upon questioning of Council, advised that the enforcement policy for the past two years, prior to this particular issue, was to respond on a complaint basis only. FURTHER ACTION - To enforce Section 22500 of the California Vehicle Code where the parked vehicle will not allow a three - toot passage. Motion Schmeltzer, second Mayor Brutsch AYES - Schmeltzer, Webber, Mayor Brutsch NOES - Barks, Wood (with stipulation this motion abrogates law) Prior to the vote on the above motion, City Attorney Post stated that the motion was a reasonable one, at least in the short run. City Manager Meyer expressed concern that this enforcement would cause a dramatic increase in citations. FINAL ACTION - To direct the Planning Commission to review various alternatives for improving the parking situation throughout the community, one of these alternatives to be extending the width of the sidewalk area and reducing the width of the street. 'Motion Schmeltzer, second Webber AYES - Barks, Schmeltzer, Webber, Mayor Brutsch NOES - Wood -8- Minutes 3-13-84 Q 2.2500 — 440 (b) A local authority may, by ordinance or requirements for the public safety regulating vehicles upon any street. Added Ch. 362, Slats. 1984. Effective January 1, 1985. Amended Ch. 495, Stats. 1985. Effective January 1, 1986. L)iv. 11 resolution, adopt additional any type of vending from CHAPTER 9. STOPPING, STANDING, AND PARKING Prohibited Stopping, Standing, or Parking 22500. No person shall stop, park, or leave standing any vehicle whether attended or unattended, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions Ufa peace officer or oTficiaf [raffic control device, in any of the following places: (a) Within an intersection except adjacenl-fo' curbs as may be permitted by local ordinance. (b) On a crosswalk, except that a bus engaged as a common carrier or a taxicab may stop in an unmarked crosswalk to load or unload passengers when authorized by the legislative body of any city pursuant to ordinance. (c) Between a safety zone and the adjacent right-hand curb or within the area between the zone and the curb as may be indicated by a sign or reel paint on the curb, which sign or paint was erected or placed by local authorities pursuant to ordinance. (d) Within 15 feet of the driveway entrance to any fire station. This paragraph does not apply to any vehicle owned or operated by a fire department and clearly marked as a fire department vehicle. (e) In front of a public or private driveway, except that a bus engaged as a common carrier, schoolbus, or a taxicab may stop to load or unload passengers when authorized by local authorities pursuant to ordinance. In unincorporated territory, where the entrance of a private road or driveway is not delineated by an opening in a curb or by other curls construction, so much of the surface of the ground as is paved, surfaced, or otherwise plainly marked by vehicle use as a private road or driveway entrance, shall constitute a driveway. (f) On a sidewalk except electric carts when authorized by local ordinance, as specified Section 21114.5. (g) Alongside or opposite any street -or -MP -Way excavation or obstruction when such stopping, standing, or parking would obstruct traffic. (h) On the roadway side of any vehicle stopped, parked, or standing at the curb or edge of a highway. (i) Except as provided under Section 22500.5, alongside curb space authorized for the loading and unloading of passengers of a bus engaged ;IN a common carrier in local transportation when indicated by a sign or ref paint on the curb erected or painted by local authorities pursuant to ordinance. (j) In a tube or tunnel, except vehicles of the authorities in charge, being used in the repair, maintenance, or inspection of the facility. (k) Upon a bridge, except vehicles of the authorities in charge, being used in the repair, maintenance, or inspection of the facility, and except that buses engaged as a common carrier in local transportation may stop to load or unload' passengers upon a bridge where sidewalks are provided, when authorized by local authorities pursuant to ordinance, and except that loc,cl authorities pursuant to ordinance or the Department of Transportation pursuant to order, within their respective jurisdictions, may permit parking on bridges having sidewalks and shoulders of sufficient width to permit parking without interfering with the normal movement of traffic on the roadway. Local authorities may, by ordinance or resolution, permit parkins; on such bridges on state highways in their respective jurisdictions if the ordinance or resolution is first approved in writing by the Department of Transportation. Parking shall not be permitted unless there are signs in place, as maybe necessary, to indicate the provisions of local ordinances or the order oftheDepartment of Transportation. (1) In front of that portion of a curb which has been cut down, lowered, or constructed to provide wheelchair accessibility to the sidewalk and which is designated for wheelchair access by either a sign or red paint on the curb pursuant to an ordinance of the local authority. Amended Ch. 1661, Stats. 1963. Effective September 20, 1963. Amended Ch. 1092, Stats. 1965. Effective September 17, 1965. Supersedes Ch. 85 and 295. Amended Ch. 490, Stats. 1972. Effective March 7, 1973. Amended Ch. 545, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975. Amended Ch. 822, Stats. 1982. Effective January 1, 1983. Amended Ch. 852, Stats. 1984. Effective January 1, 1985. Additional Prohibited Stopping, Standing, or Parking: Fire Lane 22500.1. In addition to Section 22500, no person shall stop, park, or leave standing any vehicle, whether attended or unattended, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a peace officer or official traffic control device along the edge of any highway, at any curb, or in any location in a publicly or privately owned or operated off-street parking facility, designated as a fire lane by the fire department or fire district with jurisdiction over the area in which the place is located. The designation shall be indicated (1) by a sign posted immediately adjacent to, and visible from, the designated place clearly stating in letters not less than one inch in height that the place is a fire lane, (2) by outlining or painting the place in red and, in contrasting color, marking the place with the words 'FIRE LANE", which are clearly visible from a vehicle, or (3) by a red curb or red paint on the edge of the roadway upon which is clearly marked the words "FIRE LANE". Added Ch. 328, Stats. 1983. Effective January 1, 1984. Amended Ch. 129, Stats. 1984. Effective May 21, 1984, by terms of an urgency clause. Schoolbuses: Loading and Unloading of Passengers 22500.5. Upon agreement between a transit system operating buses engaged as common carriers in local transportation and a public school district, local authorities may, by ordinance, permit schoolbuses owned by, or operated under contract for, that public school district to stop for the loading or unloading of passengers alongside any or all curb spaces designated for the loading or unloading of passengers of the transit system buses. Added Ch. 822, Stats. 1982. Effective January 1, 1983. Local Regulation of Slate Highways 22501. No ordinance enacted by local authorities pursuant to subdivisions (e) and (k) of Section 22500 or Section 22507.2 shall become effective as to any state highway without prior submission to and approval by the Department of Transportation in the same manner as required by Section 21104. Nothing contained in this section and Section 22500 shall be construed as authorizing local authorities to enact legislation which is contrary to the provisions of Sections 22512 and 25301. Amended Ch. 1500, Stats. 1965. Effective September 17, 1965. Amended Ch. 545, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975. Amended Ch. 158, Stats. 1980. Effective June 11, 1980 by terms of an urgency clause. Curb Parking 22502. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter every vehicle stopped or parked upon a roadway where there are adjacent curbs shall be stopped or parked with the right-hand wheels of such vehicle parallel with and within 18 inches of the right-hand curb, except that motorcycles shall be parked with at least one wheel or fender touching the right-hand curb. Where no curbs or barriers bound any roadway, right-hand parallel parking is required unless otherwise indicated. (b) The provisions of subdivision (a) or (e) do not apply to a commercial vehicle if a variation from the requirements of subdivision (a) or (e) is reasonably necessary to accomplish the loading or unloading of merchandise r Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council February 4, 1988 City Council Meeting of February 9, 1988 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Responsible Agent February 23, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Activity Reports - January Monthly Revenue Report - January Monthly Expenditure Report - January City Treasurer's Report - January 1986-87 Audit Ordinances and Resolutions Adoption of Ordinance No. 88-915 approving a zone change from R-2, C -potential to C-3 and negative declaration for property located at 720 Eighth Street Adoption of Resolution 88-5099 approving a precise plan for 720 Eighth Street Report re. the 3 businesses that got their ABC licenses without complying with H.B. requirements Public Hearings Certification of Environmental Impact Report for ATSF proposed General Plan amendment/zone change request General Plan and Zone Change Area #1, #1A & #1B Municipal Matters Mid -Year Budget Review 1 All Department Heads Finance Administrator Finance Administrator City Treasurer Finance Administrator Planning Director Planning Director Planning Director Planning Planning Director Director Finance Administrator/ Asst. City Mgr. r March 8, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Investment Report Review of contract between City and Group Dynamics for Men's Pro Volley- ball Tournament March 22, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Activity Reports Monthly Expenditure Report - February Monthly Revenue Report - February City Treasurer's Report - February April 12, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Investment Report Council Matters City Council Goals April 26, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Activity Reports Monthly Expenditure Report - March Monthly Revenue Report - March City Treasurer's Report - March Public Hearing General Plan and Zone Change Area #2 May 10, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Investment Report City Treasurer Community Resources Dir. Department Heads Finance Administrator Finance Administrator City Treasurer City Treasurer City Manager Department Heads Finance Administrator Finance Administrator City Treasurer Planning Director City Treasurer May 24, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Activity Reports Monthly Expenditure Report - April Monthly Revenue Report - April City Treasurer's Report - April Public Hearing General Plan and Zone Change Area #9 June 14, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Investment Report Public Hearing General Plan and Zone Change Area #7 Department Heads Finance Administrator Finance Administrator City Treasurer Planning Director City Treasurer Planning Director ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Report re. solution to fire flow upgrade problems Public Safety Director Approval of revised grading plan 532, 534-540 20th Street Public Works Director Report on problems with campaign contribution ordinance. Caretaker unit - Mfg. zone Recreational Vehicle ordinance Development of design standards and criteria by which to review projects for EIRS Acceptance of work and final estimate for replacement of sani- tary sewers Target Area I (J&J). Results of SCAG Santa Monica Bay Pollution Symposium W 1140 r(1 -10.P1 f Q 3 - City Clerk Planning Director General Services Director Planning Director Public Works Director Planning Director Report on results of noise ordi- nance study Uniform Fire Code Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Approval of contract with Computil for processing of out-of-state delinquent parking notices Public Safety Director Public Safety Director Public Safety Director General Services Director ****************+**+***********+********************************* "WMR r co uNrc I ; Jan. 30, 1988 dune (Wittiams 2065 --Mongolian 4vs. d{ssniosa &a44, L'.-4 90254 On Jan. 28 I attended a workshop at Descanso Gardens with the Office of Alcohol Programs and the Prevention Research Center The topic was Conditional Use Permits and preview of a manual the STATE of Calif. which is soon to be distributed with best mation on cities ability to use C.U.P.'s. L.A. County of Berkely. sponsored by pbssible infor- We were told that AVAILABILITY has been left up to the business community but the city should PLAN for availability just as it plans for infrastructure, to eliminate problems of alcohol abuse. Aprx. 50% of all fatalities in traffic accidents are alcohol involved. If consumption is limited, related crime, crimes of violence, accidental deaths, etc. are:diminished. It has been shown when prices of alcohol go up, consumption goes down, EVEN AMONG ALCOHOLICS. A representative from the National Council on Alcoholismsaid the cost of alcohol problems to the taxpayer in Calif. is $16 Billion a year while the income from sales in taxes is $130 million. Mr. Carl Falletta from the ABC told me it was uE to the CITY to enforce the CUP and the/ would NOT revoke a 1i6ense because the CUP was not being met. I was told by Fried Whitman, the chairman of the meeting, that Assemblyman Condit (AB937)A that if enacted he would see to it that cities would NOT incur legal fees as result of their already passed ord. effecting concurrent sales. We should send Assemblyman Condit our bills !!! 9-tm/%-rL February 2, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council February 9, 1988 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 87-26 AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD TICKET BROKER/SALES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST IN THE C-2 ZONE LOCATION: C-2 AND C-3 ZONES CITY WIDE INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL Recommendation The Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the attached text amend ordinance modifying the zoning ordinance in regard to ticket sales be adopted. Beckground On January 19, 1988, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and adopted the attached resolution recommending ticket broker/sales subject to a Conditional Use Permit in the C-2 zone. Abstract By adopting the attached ordinance ticket sales with a Conditional Use Permit will be allowed only in the C-2 and C-3 zones. Currently, these sales are allowed also in the C-1 zone. After studying the issue, this use appears to be too intense for the C-1 neighborhood commercial zone. Analysis A variety of conditions may be imposed based on site-specific problems discovered through review of each request for a ticket sales type of use. Article 10, Conditional Use Permit Standards, setsforth the criteria to be examined and for conditions to be imposed in conjunction with the issuance of Conditional Use Permits. Additional analysis is found in the attached Planning Commission staff report. Attachments 1. Planning Commission Resolution 88-10 2. Staff report dated January 12, 1988 3. Planning Commission minutes dated January 19, 1988 4. Public hearing notice for Planning Commission meeting of January 19, 1988 5. Public hearing notice for City Council meeting of February 9, 1988 1 5 1 CONCUR: Alana Mastrian Acting City Manager Respectfully subIittec�, fir G{/I, Michael SchUbach Planning Director 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DELETING TICKET BROKER FROM THE C-1 ZONE AND ADDING TICKET BROKER/SALES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE C-2 ZONE PERMITTED USE LIST AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on February 9, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following Findings: A. Ticket Brokers are currently allowed require a Conditional Use Permit; Established ticket brokers are experiencing problems to overnight camping; Requirement of a Conditional Use Permit and the imposition in C-1 zones and do not B. related C. of conditions will mitigate any problems that may arise in conjunction with the said use; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain the following: Section 1. Delete the following permitted use: Article 8, Section 8-2. Neighborhood Commercial Zone - "Ticket Broker" Section 2. Amend Article 8, Section 8-3, Restricted Commercial Zone by adding in alphabetical order the following: "Ticket Broker/Sales, Conditional Use Permit required subject to Article 10." Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in the records of the proceedings of the at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day 1988. City Council of February, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY Barkgrouttii Plairr.iats 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 88-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DELETING TICKET BROKER FROM THE C-1 ZONE AND ADDING TICKET BROKER/SALES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE C-2 ZONE PERMITTED USE LIST AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 19, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following Findings: A. Ticket Brokers are currently allowed in C-1 Zones and do not require a Conditional Use Permit; B. Established ticket brokers are experiencing problems related to overnight camping; C. Requirement of a Conditional Use Permit and the imposition of conditions will mitigate any problems that may arise in conjunction with the said use; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends the following: Section 1. Section 2. Delete the following permitted use: Article 8, Section 8-2. Neighborhood Commercial Zone - "Ticket Broker" Amend Article 8, Section 8-3, Restricted Commercial Zone by adding in alphabetical order the following: "Ticket Broker/Sales, Conditional Use Permit required subject to Article 10." VOTE: AYES: Comms.Rue,DeBellis,Cbmn.Compton NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comms.Ingell,Peirce CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 88-10 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California a their regular meeting of January 19, 1988. - 5 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 'Compton, Chairman Mic ael Schubech, Secretary Date 6 January 12, 1988 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission January 19, 1988 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 87-26 AND TEXT AMENDMENT LOCATION: CITY-WIDE APPLICANT; DIRECTIVE FROM THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION REQUEST: TO ALLOW TICKET BROKER/SALES ON THE PERMITTED USE LIST IN C-2 ZONES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Recommendation Staff Recommends adoption of the attached Resolution. Background The Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of January 7, 1988, recommended that the Planning Commission prepare a Negative Declaration for this project. The City Council and the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a text amendment which will require a Conditional Use Permit for establishments which sell special event tickets. (e.g. concerts, sporting events, etc.) Analysis The Zoning Code presently allows ticket brokers in C-1 zones. No Conditional Use Permit is required. The C-2 zone is a more appropriate zone for ticket sale establishments. During recent Public Hearings for a proposed zone change for a property adjacent to the Music Plus, several residents spoke to the Planning Commission and City Council and testified of problems existing at the site related to the sale of special event tickets. The primary concerns included overnight camping, loitering, and noise. The Planning Department studied their concerns and determined that several people were camping out in front of the ticket outlet the night before tickets went on sale for a popular event. People were loitering in the adjacent residential areas and creating excessive noise. It is anticipated that a Conditional Use Permit for ticket sales will establish conditions on an establishment to eliminate the associated problems. Conditions will include prohibiting overnight camping and hours of operation. CONCUR: Michael 5chubach Planning Director Andew Per Associate P anner PLANNING COMMISJ_JN MINUTES - JANUARY 19, 1988 PAGE 9 TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO REQUIRE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR TICKET SALES ESTABLISHMENTS (SPECIAL EVENT) Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated January 12, 1988. The Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of January 7, 1988, recommended that the Planning Commission prepare a negative declaration for this project. The City Council and the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a text amendment which will require a conditional use permit for establishments which sell special event tickets, e.g., concerts and sporting events. The zoning code presently allows ticket brokers in C-1 zones. No conditional use permit — is required. The C-2 zone is a more appropriate zone for ticket sale establishments. During recent public hearings for a proposed zone change for a property adjacent to the Music Plus, several residents spoke to the Planning Commission and City Council and testified about problems existing at the site related to the sale of special event tickets. The primary concerns included overnight camping, loitering, and noise. The Planning Department studied their concerns and determined that several people were camping out in front of the ticket outlet the night before tickets went on sale for a popular event. People were loitering in the adjacent residential areas and creating excessive noise. • It is anticipated that a conditional use permit for ticket sales will establish conditions on an establishment to eliminate the associated problems. Conditions will include a PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 19, 1988 PAGE 10 prohibiting overnight camping and the hours of operation. Staff recommended adoption of the proposed resolution. Public Hearing opened at 8:45 P.M. by Chmn. Compton. There being no citizens who appeared either in favor of or in opposition to this matter, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION by Comm. DeBellis, seconded by Comm. Rue, to approve staff's recommendation to adopt Resolution P.C. 88-10, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO REQUIRE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR ESTABLISHMENTS THAT SELL SPECIAL EVENT TICKETS TO THE C-2 ZONE PERMITTED USE LIST SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF ARTICLE 10. No objections; so ordered. Recess taken from 8:48 P.M. until 8:57 P.M. �0 Easy Reader Run Date: January 7, 1988 DISPLAY Acct: 7010-2110 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the PLANNING COMMISSION of the City of Hermosa Beach shall hold a public hearing on January 19, 1988 to conside- the following: 1. Text Amendment to Open Space definition, location & computation. 2. Variance to allow deck to encroach into sideyard setback at 845 & 845 1/2 Eighth Street. 3. Text Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance & Environmental Negative Declarati regarding the definition of a "restaurant" and "snack bar" and to require a Conditional Use Permit for said uses. 4. Text Amendment to require a Conditional Use Permit for ticket sales establishments (special event). 5. Conditional Use Permit & Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #18989 for a 3 -unit condominium project at 1452 Loma Drive. 6.*Zone Change of Areas 1, lA & 1B from R-3 to R-2 *Map onfile in Planning Department in City Hall. SAID PUBLIC HEARING shall be at .7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chamber, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate at that time anc place or to write to the City Council in care of the Planning anc Environmental Services Department at the above address. IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing describec in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Department at, or prior to, the public hearing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Planning Department at 376-6984, Ext. 242. Michael Schubach Planning Director City of Hermosa Beach 81. C i Easy Reader Run Date: January 28, 1988 DISPLAY Acct: 7010-2110 PUBLIC NOTICE r NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY COUNCIL of the City of. Hermosa Beacl shall hold a public hearing on February 9, 1988 to consider the following: 1. Text amendment to Zoning Ordinance & Environmantal Negative Declaration to require Conditional Use Permit for ticket sales establishments and to permit such establishments in the C-2 zone. SAID PUBLIC HEARING shall be at 8:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chamber, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate at that time anc place or to write to the City Council in care of the Planning anc Environmental Services Department at the above address PRIOR to Thursday, February 4, 1988 at 12:00 noon . IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing describec in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered .to the Planning Department at, or prior to, the public hearing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Planning Department at 376-6984, Ext. 242. Alana Mastrian .Acting City Manager City of Hermosa Beach —(2— Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 3, 1988 Regular Meeting of February 9, 1988 SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL -- TOXIC WASTE SOIL CONTAMINATION INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Background At the January 5, 1988 Planning commission meeting, the issue of soil contamination was discussed in conjunction with the certification of the Environmental Impact Report for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway General Plan and Zone Change request. The Planning commission resolved that soil contamination should be examined citywide. Analysis The area of toxic waste is very specialized. Should the City Council decide that a study of soil contamination citywide is necessary, then, it is suggested a consultant be hired for this purpose. Attacbement 1. Planning Commission minutes of January 5, 1988. Respectfully. j bmf ted, CONCUR: Mich:el Schubac.. 7 Planning Director Alana Mastrian Acting City Manager C C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 RESOLUTION P.C. 88-6 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL TAKE THE APPROPRIATE ACTION TO STUDY THE ISSUE OF TOXIC WASTE CITY-WIDE VIA A LITERATURE SEARCH, INTERVIEWS WITH LONG-TIME RESIDENTS, AND POSSIBLY SOIL SAMPLES IF DEEMED NECESSARY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public meeting on January 5, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. There is a potential for gound contamination along the ATSF Railroad right-of-way, along 6th Street, west of Valley, and various other areas throughout the City; B. It is in the interest of health, safety and welfare that a study of toxic waste soil contamination be prepared; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend to the City Council to take the appropriate action to study the issue of toxic waste soil contamination City -Wide via a literature search, interviews of long time residents, and possibly soil samples if deemed necessary. VOTE: AYES: Comms.DeBellis,Ingell,Peirce,Rue,Chmn.Compton NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None I hereby tr an CERTIFICATION certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 88-6 is a mplete record of the action taken by the Planning the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their tin . January 5, 1988. ? 1 g 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 ald Compton, Chairman Ddte Michael Schu6ac ,`Secretary - � PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTESJANUARY 5, 1988 CERTIFICATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 1, 1987, MEETING) Mr. Schubach read into the record the following statements: "The California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines do not require a public hearing for E.I.R.'s according to Section 15202. However, if a public hearing is provided as the City has opted to do in the case of the Railroad Right -of -Way E.I.R., Section 15202 suggests that the same procedures be used as are used for other city public hearings. "The City, however, has gone beyond its regular public noticing for adoption of resolutions in the following manner: 1. Provided a schedule of all public hearing dates and times to Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company. 2. Provided a written "reminder to the railway company of the continued public hearing date of January 5, 1988, already specified at the December 1, 1987, public hearing. 3. Posted the subject property three times: once for the 45 -day review period; once for the December 1, 1987, public hearing; once for the January 5, 1988, continued public hearing. 4. Publicly noticed in the local newspaper three times: once for the 45 -day draft E.I.R. review period; once for the December 1, 1987, public hearing; and once for the continued January 5, 1988, public hearing. "Since the CEQA guidelines recommend the same noticing process as for other public hearings, the appropriate process is noted in Section 1605(A) of the zoning ordinance. Note this is not a hearing for the actual zone change, but only for the E.I.R." Mr. Schubach continued by giving staff report dated December 30, 1987. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 16 and 18, 1987, to accept input concerning the draft Environmental Impact Report prepared by the consultants, Sanchez Telarico. • The report was found to be erroneous and inadequate. The major problems were the use of PLANNING COMI_.ON MINUTES - JANUARY 5, 1988 PAGE 4 the wrong project description and winter traffic counts instead of summer counts. These two problems caused all related sections such as noise and air quality to be in error. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council certification of the Environmental Impact Report subject to additional modifications as noted in the reports received by the Commissioners and any other changes deemed necessary based on public hearing testimony. The document has now been rewritten. Because the document had to be rewritten, another 45 -day public review period and public hearing were provided. At the December 1, 1987, meeting, the Planning Commission continued this matter to January 5, 1988, so that all comments could be responded to. The responses are generally adequate except for areas noted. However, the format should be modified prior to submittal to the City Council. The document should have the current text which needed revising removed and the new text integrated into the document. Also, a revised table of comments identifying all parts of the document should be provided. The revised noise section is complete; however, some of the numerical figures seem low. For instance, the increase in traffic between Ardmore and Pacific Coast Highway on 8th Street is almost doubled, but the increase in noise is only 1.8 bda. Some explanation should be given. The Air Quality Section is still being revised, as more time than was anticipated was necessary. Mr. Schubach stated that it is important to expedite this matter and be within the legal parameters; therefore, staff recommended the Planning Commission to recommend certification of the EIR, subject to the necessary modifications. Comm. Rue asked whether other matters could be brought up and discussed in the future if the Planning Commission recommends certification of the EIR at this time. He noted that it is possible that other areas of concern could be discovered at a future time. Mr. Schubach replied in the affirmative, noting that the Commission is merely making a recommendation to the Council at this time. He noted that if anyone has additional comments, those comments should be related to the responses given, not to, the draft EIR, since the 45 -day review period is over. If anyone feels that the responses are inadequate, they have a right to comment upon that. Comm. Rue asked whether new issues could be included in the EIR which may arise as a result of new public hearing information or information based on the comments of the reports relating to noise, traffic, and air quality. Mr. Bruce Tepper, consulting attorney to the City, replied in the affirmative. He stated that the public response period has technically ended; however, in view of the flexibility provided by CEQA, a public body considering a document of this type has the ability to incorporate comments which are received late, with some exceptions, into the report. Mr. Tepper noted that the areas of concern in the document are statistical data supporting the conclusions, not changes in conclusions reached by the document. In terms of the ultimate substance, the document will not change one bit. Some of the PLANNING COMM( -SON MINUTES - JANUARY 5, 1988 ` PAGE 5 statistical data may change somewhat, but not much. He noted that staff recommended certification subject to these additional details because it is staffs' opinion that the data to be included is not of a material nature, but merely additional back-up information for the conclusions that are reached in the document itself. Comm. Ingell asked when the EIR would go before the City Council if the recommendation to certify is approved tonight. Mr. Schubach stated that it would go to the Council in one month. Comm. Peirce asked about the placement of the responses within the document. Mr. Tepper stated that the comments and responses to comments are a part of the body of the EIR, not part of the appendices. The comments are of no less import than any of the initial portion of the document. He continued by explaining the locations of the comments within the document, stating that they are a separate portion of the EIR. Chmn. Compton asked whether it is the opinion of Mr. Tepper that the document is certifiable. Mr. Tepper replied in the affirmative. Public Hearing reopened at 7:56 P.M. by Chmn. Compton. Frank Greco, representing Turini and Brink, 1920 East 17th Street, Santa Ana, addressed the Commission. He stated that late last week he had received a package of information, and there has not been adequate time to review the materials. However, the applicant does not object to this document going forward to the City Council for certification at this time, subject to several conditions. If there are to be any substantive changes, the applicant would like to request an opportunity to review and comment on any changes at such time the comments are forwarded to the City Council. This would include any changes to the summary of the traffic and circulation, noise elements, and air quality, as well as any other changes that might be made to the document. Mr. Greco felt that in fairness to the applicant and to the public, it is appropriate that the applicant and citizens have an adequate period of time in which to comment on those changes. Mr. Greco stated that the issue of air quality information is somewhat undecided at this point as to when it might be completed. He urged that there be no delay in the continued process of the matter. Rosamond Fogg, 610 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission. She stated that she feels the document is indeed certifiable. She commented on Page 9, No. 8, "Toxic and Hazardous Substances," and read a portion of that response: "...The act of approval or disapproval of this Project will not in itself result in any disturbance of the soil of the site. While the potential for subsurface contamination due to toxic or hazardous substances exist, approval of the land use changes will not activate such toxic and hazardous conditions...." Ms. Fogg stated that the reason behind not doing the soils testing appears to be somewhat faulty. She felt that there should be another, more sound reason given for not doing the testing. PLANNING COMMCON MINUTES - JANUARY 5, 1988 Public Hearing closed at 8:01 P.M. by Chmn. Compton. Comm. Rue commented that the issue of how noise would affect neighborhoods was not addressed. He hoped that that issue would be final noise study. Comm. Ingell stated that he favored the soils testing, noting that he problem could exist at the site, and it should be addressed. Comm. Ingell stated that the document as presented is difficult for the and understand. PAGE 6 the surrounding addressed in the feels a potential layperson to read Chmn. Compton noted that soils testing would be required at such time when an actual structure is proposed for the site. He noted that he would be very much in favor of doing everything possible to ascertain whether a problem does actually exist with toxic waste. He noted, however, that it is a question of when the testing would be required, suggesting that now might not be the appropriate time. He noted that it is not even certain whether the applicant will apply for the zone change. Comm. Ingell felt that soils testing should be done regardless of whether or not any structure is put on the site because of the water structure. Also, people use that area for jogging, and they could be kicking up toxic dust. Comm. DeBellis stated that he has read the documents presented and the previous minutes of this matter, as well as watched the meetings on television. He asked, however, if he was eligible to participate in discussion of the issue. Mr. Lough replied in the affirmative. Comm. DeBellis stated that this EIR has been studied at length, and there comes a time with any project when a decision must be reached. He noted that the Commission is being asked to make a recommendation based solely on whether or not it is felt that the report is adequate. He noted that legislative acts are not at issue at this time. Comm. DeBellis read from Page 9, Alternatives: "...What is clear from the discussion of alternatives is that any development constructed on the site will be environmentally inferior to the existing condition. The question before the City is whether it should change the existing Open Space uses in the proposed Project. The alternatives presented are reasonable and feasible to this determination. If the land use changes are approved, it is ATSF's responsibility to prepare and submit a specific development plan for the site which would integrate the development objectives with City policies...." Comm. DeBellis noted that Page 9 states: "...CEQA does not require that the City conduct every test and perform all research, study, and experimentation recommended to it to determine true and full environmental impact before it can approve or disapprove the proposed Project. It can properly, as here, identify the potential impact and require subsequent � testing and research prior to any work or construction and development on the site.... Comm. DeBellis believed that more than adequate information has been presented in order to enable the City Council to make a decision on the impacts of approving or disapproving a requested zone change request and general plan change. PLANNING COMM( .ON MINUTES - JANUARY 5, 1988( PAGE 7 Comm. DeBellis was somewhat dismayed that nobody has expressed a concern that the soils testing should be done immediately since there could be a daily problem with the dust. He stated that every times it rains, something could be percolating into the well system. He noted that it is not appropriate to delay the EIR; however, if there is indeed concern, testing should be done to ascertain whether or not a problem does actually exist, because the problem will exist whether or not anything is built on the site. Comm. DeBellis concluded by stating that he feels the EIR to be adequate and certifiable. Comm. Peirce stated that he had no comments, noting that he agreed with the comments made by the other Commissioners. He felt that the EIR is certifiable. Chmn. Compton discussed the lease of this land, stating that there could be a major impact on the salt water intrusion project if the railroad decided to exercise its option to end the lease. He asked for clarification of this issue. Mr. Tepper stated that there is a license which is not an interest in land which is terminable. He continued by speculating what the railroad may or may not do in this regard. He discussed the issue of eminent domain. He stated that the response points out the fact that the equipment used in the salt water intrusion program is quite cumbersome and bulky. A particular governmental body does have the power of eminent domain itself, and there does not appear to be in the adjacent property areas of ent open open space sufficient to bring in that equipment on a regular basis in order to perform the work. He stated that this may prove to be more of an impediment to development on this property than most people realize. The response given, however, is accurate. Chmn. Compton discussed the issues of toxic waste, literature searches, and interviews of long-time residents. He agreed that if there is a potential problem with toxic waste, study should be given to the matter. He suggested that effort be given to trying to determine whether there have been toxic problems in the past. Chmn. Compton concluded by stating that he feels the EIR is a certifiable document. MOTION by Comm. DeBellis, seconded by Comm. Rue, to certify the Environmental Impact Report for the. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Right -of -Way and recommend that it be referred to the City Council. AYES: Comms. DeBellis, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comm. Ingell ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Comm. DeBellis returned to the issue of hazardous waste and suggested that there be a resolution or recommendation sent to the City Council stating that •the Planning Commission has expressed concern that there may be a problem existing, and that the Council should take appropriate steps to make a determination by whatever means are necessary. He noted also that animal feces may pose a danger at the site. MOTION by Comm. DeBellis, seconded by Chmn. Compton, to direct staff to prepare a resolution or recommendation (whichever is deemed appropriate by staff) to be sent to the City Council as noted above. PLANNING COM[1r ON MINUTES - JANUARY 5, 1988( PAGE 8 Comm. Peirce agreed that this is a good idea; however, he felt that the issue should not be restricted to the railroad. He noticed that there are several other areas, specifically on 6th Street west of Valley, where there are probably just as high a potential for ground contamination. Therefore, he felt that the resolution should be for a City-wide survey. Mr. Schubach stated that staff could either prepare a memo to be sent to the City Council which relays the concerns expressed by the Commission, or staff could draft a resolution. Mr. Lough stated that either way is acceptable, so long as the issue remains separate from the action taken on the railroad right-of-way EIR. Chmn. Compton favored a resolution. He also felt that it is appropriate to conduct interviews of long-term residents. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION by Comm. Peirce to include all areas of the City in the survey. Agreed to by Comm. DeBellis as maker and Chmn. Compton as second. Frank Greco addressed the Commission and asked for clarification on the intent of the motion. He noted concern that there could be a delay in the EIR process and the project. Chmn. Compton noted that the issue of the railroad EIR is separate from the action being taken in regard to a City-wide survey on hazardous waste. John Edwards, 501 Herondo, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and discussed hazardous waste, stating that there is a difference between what is existing and what there would be with a project. He felt that the difference with this particular project, though, is that by digging up earth, hazardous particles could be. lofted through the air. Mr. Edwards stated that he would like to see a copy of the final EIR. He felt that the intent of CEQA is to ensure that the impacts of a project are completely understood before it is started. He favored a literature search prior to in depth testing. Comm. DeBellis stated that the purpose of his motion is to investigate to determine whether there is an existing probleni; and that if a change is approved, that any future development on the project would require additional testing. He stated that it is up to the City Council to approve or disapprove any final project; and he feels that the EIR presented is adequate for the City Council to make its determination. Comm. Rue felt that if anything detrimental turns up in the literature search, the City Council should at that point decide upon a mechanism by which responsibility is determined in addressing the matter. AYES: Comms. DeBellis, Ingell, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None