Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11/14/89
"One faces the future with one's past." - Pearl S. Buck AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, November 14, 1989 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 5:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Roger Creighton MAYOR PRO TEM Chuck Sheldon COUNCILMEMBERS Jim Rosenberger Etta Simpson June Williams CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. ROTATION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEM: A. Designate Mayor for 9 month term ending August 14, 1990 B. Designate Mayor Pro Tempore for 9 month term ending August 14, 1990 C. Intergovernmental agencies requiring appointment of Mayor as delegate. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated November 8, 1989. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on October 24, 1989. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the monthly invest- ment report for October, 1989. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated November 6, 1989. (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #19579 for a two -unit condominium located at 533 Mon- terey Boulevard. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 1, 1989. (f) Recommendation to authorize sale of forfeited property pursuant to Section 11473.3 of the California Health and Safety Code. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated October 26, 1989. (g) Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to sign an agree- ment for installation and upgrade of fire hydrants. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated October 26, 1989. (h) Recommendation to adopt resolution creating a handi- capped stall at 1253 - 21st Street. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 23, 1989. (i) Recommendation to approve request for proposals for cost allocation plan. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated November 2, 1989. (j) Recommendation to deny the following claims for damages and refer to the City's Claims Administrator: 1) Sunstone Music, c/o Law Offices of Peter R. Diona- to, 8421 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 205, Beverly Hills, CA 90201, filed October 17, 1989; alleged unlawful breach of contract. 2) Dama Claire Strizak, 408 Ocean View #B, Hermosa Beach, filed October 17, 1989; alleged auto acci- dent resulting from alleged negligent maintenance of tree. 3) Hans Joachim Schreier, 853 So. Bedford St., #4, Los Angeles 90035, filed October 2, 1989; alleged auto damage from fire hydrant. (m) (n) (o) (p) Recommendation to receive and file response to com- plaints by Michael Fitton regarding Vasek Polak auto dealerships. Memorandum from Building and Safety Direc- tor William Grove dated November 2, 1989. Recommendation to adopt proposed resolution establishing the conditional use permit procedure for review and ap- proval of requests for exceptions, pursuant to Sections 13-3(A), 13-7(B), and 13-7(C) of the Zoning Ordinance, from certain provisions regarding the remodeling and expansion of nonconforming structures. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 2, 1989. (CONTINUED FROM 10/24/89 MEETING.) Recommendation to approve design for entry signs to the City and direst staff to prepare a bid package. Memo- randum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian- Handman dated November 2, 1989. Recommendation to approve requests from Chamber of Com- merce and staff regarding holiday activities. Memoran- dum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated November 6, 1989. Recommendation to transfer $15,100 and authorize pur- chase of 220 parking meters from Duncan Industries to replace existing meters. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated November 6, 1989. Recommendation to receive and file review of past park- ing structure proposals. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated November 7, 1989. Recommendation to authorize disposal of the ladder truck previously donated to the Fire Department. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated Oc- tober 30, 1989. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. A. ADOPTION OF THE 1988 EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILD- ING CODE, UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS, UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT.OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, UNI- FORM PLUMBING CODE AND THE 1987 EDITION OF THE NA- TIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. Ordinance for introduction and waiver of full reading. Memorandum from Build- ing and Safety Director William Grove dated Novem- ber 1, 1989. 3 B. ADOPTION OF THE 1988 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated November 3, 1989. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. SPECIAL EVENT AND FILMING POLICY AND FEES A. RECOMMENDATION TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 83-720 ENTI- TLED "CREATING AND ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL EVENT POLICY"; AND APPROVAL OF SPECIAL EVENT RULES AND REGULATIONS. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated October 31, 1989. B. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES AND CHARG- ES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated November 6, 1989. C. RECOMMENDATION TO AMEND FILM PERMIT POLICY AND ADOPT PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTATION. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian- Handman dated November 1, 1989. 7. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 27A, "SANITATION, GARBAGE AND REFUSE" TO PERMIT SALVAGING OF RECYCLABLE MATERIAL. For introduction and waiver of full reading. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated November 6, 1989. 8. PROPOSED EMPLOYER/EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION RELATIONS RESOLUTION. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated November 5, 1989. 9. RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION ON NAMING THE GREENBELT. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated November 1, 1989. 10. VACANCY OF THE OFFICE OF CITY CLERK. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated November 8, 1989. 11. RECOMMENDATION FOR REVIEW OF PROCESSING OF OIL ENVIRON- MENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND OTHER OIL RELATED PROPOSED AC- TIONS. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 7, 1989. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Recommendation on organization of General Services and Code Enforcement function. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated October 18, 1989. (CONTINUED FROM 10/24/89 MEETING.) 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL •a (a) Report and recommendation regarding revisions to employ- ment agreement with the City Manager. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated November 8, 1989. 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request of Councilmember Simpson regarding public post- ing of City Council Closed Session agenda. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (b) Request of Mayor Williams for discussion of requiring conditional use permit for new commercial developments such as hotels. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. (c) Request by Mayor Pro Tem Creighton for discussion of construction site enforcement. (d) (e) Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a , future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. Request by Councilmember Sheldon for discussion re. zoning standards in residential zones, i.e., lot coverage, parking setbacks, etc.; and height limit, set- backs, parking and bulk in commercial zones. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. Request by Councilwoman Williams for discussion of addi- tion red curb at 24th and Valley. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on . the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. ADJOURNMENT 5 CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS Where there is no vision the people perish... • HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led• by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to -learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 • . NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers 41,0 r THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa.Beach bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying our Council policy. The. Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, Operating through tbe entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the • United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. ' • Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; 'approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on•certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City -Clerk, prior to the Hearing. • Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government•revenues and/or public conduct. All • ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week laterCouncil• may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of communicate to or make with the City Clerk by advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meetin Miscellaneous Items and Reports -.City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings of, or for action by the City Council. g. items -to the attention . Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on tbe agenda, usually having arisen since. tbe agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports. - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's•pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business -district. • • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California held on Tuesday, October 24, 1989 at the hour of 7:35 P.M. CLOSED SESSION held pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) regarding litigation: Gotanda v. City of Hermosa Beach; real property negotiations regarding A.T. & S.F., and 617 Cypress (Stinnett Oil lease) and Personnel; at the hour of 6:30 P.M. Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams Absent: None PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams Absent: None PROCLAMATIONS Red Ribbon Week, October 22 - 29, 1989 - California for Drug -Free Youth campaign to offer our citizens the opportunity to demon- strate their commitment to drug-free lifestyles. Presentations were made by Officer Tom Thompson and Hermosa Val- ley School Teacher Dee Strange. Hermosa Beach Management Assn. President Michael Schubach presented a $100.00 donation to the DARE program. PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE TO RETIRING GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR JOAN NOON, RETIRING NOVEMBER 4, 1989 AFTER SERVING 16 YEARS WITH THE CITY. The Mayor and City Manager presented the plaque to Direc- tor Joan Noon. LORETO TRIP - Mayor Williams presented a gift to the City of Her- mosa Beach from its Sister City Loreto, a beautiful collection of native seashells attractively arranged in a basket. CITIZEN COMMENTS Howard Longacre - 1221- 7th Street- re: 1(a), 1(b), & 2(a).. Wilma Burt - 1152- 7th Street- re: 1(k) and 1(p). 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve Consent Calendar items (a) through (v) with the exception of the following items which were pulled but are listed in order for clarity 1(a), 1(b), 1(e), 1(f), 1(j), 1(k), 1(1), 1(m), 1(n), 1(o), 1(p), and 1(s). Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on October 10, 1989. (b) Addressing the Council on this item was: Howard Longacre regarding his comments from the previous meeting not being in the minutes as he had requested. Action: To approve the minutes with the following change: on Page 4, Item C to read as follows: "Council - member Simpson declared an apparent conflict of interest due to living within 300' of properties located in the NorthWest Quadrant of the former MultiUse Corridor (21st Street to Pier Avenue)." Motion Simpson, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos.31350, and 31460-31644 inclusive; noting voided war- rants 31467-31469 inclusive and 31535-31536 inclusive. Action: To approve the Demands & Warrants. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Councilmember Creighton requested that these lists be duplexed in order to save paper. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the September, 1989 monthly financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report, 2) City Treasurer's report. (e) Recommendation to accept and file the park irrigation system assessment and rehabilitation program (to be im- plemented with Recreation/Park Master Plan), CIP 88-508. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 21, 1989. CONTINUED FROM 10/10/89 MTG. (Pulled by Councilmember Simpson). Action: To receive and file. Motion Simpson, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (f) Recommendation to receive and file policy on motorcy- cles. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wis- niewski dated October 4, 1989. CONTINUED FROM 10/10/89 MTG. (Pulled by Councilmember Sheldon). Action: To receive and file, and look into requiring helmets with face masks. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (g) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #19820 for a three -unit condominium located at 621 Ninth Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 16, 1989. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5319, entitled "A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP # 19820 2 (h) (i) (j) (k) (1) FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM LOCATED AT 621 9TH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #19517 for a four -unit condominium located at 1111 Val- ley Drive. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 16, 1989. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5320, entitled "A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP # 19517 FOR A FOUR -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1111 VAL- LEY DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #19637 for a two -unit condominium located at 637 Manhat- tan Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 16, 1989. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5321, entitled "A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP # 19637 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 637 MANHATTAN AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to approve modification to L. A. County lifeguard building to house emergency "911" equipment. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated October 16, 1989. Action: To approve the modification to the Los Angeles County Lifeguard Headquarters building to house emergen- cy "911" equipment in an abandoned restroom in the garage building, and send a letter thanking the County for working with the City. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. So ordered. Recommendation to approve proposal for General Services Public Information Program and appropriate $6,000 from the Parking Fund to the Parking Enforcement Contract Services Account and $4,000 from the Crossing Guard Fund to the Crossing Guard Contract Services Account. Memo- randum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated October 2, 1989. Action: To approve the concept, with details to come back to Council before any monies are spent. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. So ordered. Recommendation to approve exterior painting of building located at the end of the pier; direct staff to prepare an RFP for ground lease for operation of a business/ facility at end of pier; and appropriate $1,500 from Parks & Recreation Facility Tax Fund for advertising. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman and Public Works Director Anthony An- tich dated October 3, 1989. CONTINUED FROM 10/10/89 MTG. (Pulled by Councilmember Simpson) - 3 - Action: To approve staff recommendation Number 3: Di- rect staff to try and find alternate sources of funding for a study to be done on the pier and its potential uses. Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Recommendation to receive and file report re. illegal dwelling unit abatement activity. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated October 5, 1989. CONTINUED FROM 10/10/89 MTG. (Pulled by Coun- cilmember Sheldon) Action: To receive and file. Motion Williams, second Sheldon. So ordered. Recommendation to prepare Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated October 17, 1989. Addressing the Council on this item was: Wilma Burt - 1152- 7th Street. Action: To approve the preparation of a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and appropriate $7,875 to the Finance Department Contract Services account from the General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance for addi- tional services from the City's auditors, Grant Thorton, and the application filing fee for the Government Finance Officers Association Certificate Program. Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson. So ordered, noting the objections of Sheldon and Creighton. Recommendation regarding downtown trash enclosures, CIP 89-148. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 17, 1989. Addressing the Council on this item was: Howard Longacre Action: To approve the proposed trash enclosure design for the downtown trash enclosures; proceed with in house design for one enclosures; and authorize staff to pro- ceed with any appropriate design change. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the objection of Sheldon. Recommendation to accept preliminary design report on sanitary sewer improvements, Target Area 4, CIP 88-406. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 16, 1989. Addressing the Council on this item were: Wilma Burt - 1152- 7th Street Robert Benz - 2901 Manhattan Avenue Action: To accept the preliminary design report dated August 1989, for CIP 88-406 as prepared by Harris & Assoc. and reviewed by staff; increase Harris & Assoc. contract from $94,050 to a not -to -exceed amount of $136,480. This increase is to cover an expanded scope of design work from 10,000 lineal feet to 14,855 feet of sewer rehabilitation; and authorize staff to issue ad- denda as necessary within budget limitations. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Recommendation to adopt resolution to add a one-way street (27th Street, Manhattan Avenue to Hermosa Avenue one-way westbound) to the list of one-way streets. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 16;, 1989. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5322, entitled ''A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SECTIONS OF CERTAIN STREETS AS ONE-WAY." Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to sign a month- to-month lease extension for the Pier Concession Stand. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 17, 1989. Recommendation to adopt resolution establishing the con- ditional use permit procedure for review and approval of requests for exceptions, pursuant to Sections 13-3(A), 13-7(B), and 13-7(C) of the Zoning Ordinance, from cer- tain provisions regarding the remodeling and expansion of nonconforming structures. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 17, 1989. Addressing the Council on this item were: Gerry Compton - 200 Pier Avenue Merna Marshall - 360- 33rd Street Action: To send back to staff, addressing the Council's comments regarding hearing vs. Public Hearing; fees; and Conditional Use Permit. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to approve data processing emergency back up agreements with South Tahoe Public Utility District and Phoenix Group Information Systems. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated October 17, 1989. Recommendation to receive and file an information report regarding the City's emergency preparedness. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated Oc- tober 19, 1989. (v) Recommendation to accept work as complete Community Cen- ter Theatre Air Conditioning, CIP 88-610. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 17, 1989. Addressing the Council on this item was: Howard Longacre Action: To accept the work as complete CIP 88-610, con- structed by Los Angeles Air Conditioning, Inc.; au- thorize staff to: release the retention payment to Los Angeles Air subject to staff approval, release from the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond, and File a Notice of Completion. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) ORDINANCE NO. 89-1012 - AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE ZONE FROM C-3 TO SPA NO. 6 (SPECIFIC PLAN AREA) FOR AREA NW - 3, THE VACANT PROPERTY ON THE WEST SIDE OF P.C.H. (FOR- MERLY THE ST. MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL) AT 1845 P.C.H. For adoption. Addressing the Council on this item were: Howard Longacre - 1221 7th Street Wilma Burt - 1152 7th Street Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-1012 entitled " AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN EN- VIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the abstention of Simpson and the objection of Williams due to the fact that there are no minimum setbacks and the height limit. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 89-1013 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE "MULTI -USE CORRIDOR"; AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-1004 TO EXCLUDE THE DESCRIBED PROPERTIES FROM SAID MORATORI- UM; AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-1013 entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE AT- TACHED MAP AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. (c) ORDINANCE NO. 89-1014 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE "MULTI -USE CORRIDOR"; AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-1004 TO EXCLUDE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTIES FROM SAID MORATORIUM; AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DEC- LARATION. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-1014 entitled 'IAN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE AT- TACHED MAP AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered. (d) ORDINANCE NO. 89-1015 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION FROM R -P TO R-3 FOR AREA C-3 (MANHATTAN AVENUE AND 10TH STREET.) For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-1015 entitled HAN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE DESIG- NATION FOR THE AREA AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered, noting the abstention of Sheldon and Rosenberger. (e) ORDINANCE NO. 89-1016 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION FROM C-2 TO R -2B FOR AREA D-3 (HERMOSA AVENUE AND 16TH STREET.) For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-1016 entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE DESIG- NATION FOR THE AREA AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the abstention of Sheldon. (f) ORDINANCE NO. 89-1017 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION FROM M-1 TO C-2 FOR AREA B (1301-1319 BARD ST.); C-1 TO R-2 FOR AREA E-1 (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT GREENWICH VILLAGE (27TH ST. AND MANHATTAN AVE.); R-3 TO R-2 FOR AREA E-2 (MANHATTAN AVE. BETWEEN 26TH AND 27TH ST.); C-1 TO R-3 FOR AREA F (N/W CORNER MANHATTAN AT 33RD) AND C-1 TO R-2 FOR AREA F (N/E CORNER MANHATTAN AT 33RD). For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-1017, entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATIONS FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1 (a) , (b) , (e) , (f) , (j) , (k) , (1) , (n) , (o) , and (p) were pulled and discussed at this time but are list- ed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC (a) (b) (c) Letter from Roy A. Judd, 2416 Hermosa Avenue, dated Sep- tember 27, 1988 regarding bootleg unit, claim for damage, and police problems. (Requested by Mayor Williams and Councilmember Sheldon.) CONTINUED FROM 10/ 10/89 MTG. Supplemental letter from Lonnie & Jeanne Ar- gaonight - 2329 Hermosa Avenue dated October 16. Addressing the council on this item was: Gerry Compton Action: Staff to research costs for hiring a law firm with expertise in the field of bootleg abatement. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. Further Action: To receive and file item 1(m). Motion Williams, second Sheldon. So ordered. Letter from Mr. Judd will come back to council on Novem- ber 28. Letter from Dr. Peter Willman, Mayor of Weil am Rhein in Germany, dated August 21, 1989, thanking the City for making his visit to Hermosa Beach so pleasant. (Re- quested by Mayor Williams.) CONTINUED FROM 10/10/89 MTG. Action: To receive and file. Motion Williams, second Sheldon. So ordered. Letter from Dawn Bailey, 17316 Arnie Ave., Torrance, thanking the Police Department for their professional treatment and kindness in assisting her with an article for her school newspaper. (Requested by Councilmember Sheldon.) Action: To receive and file. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD GYMNASIUM/HEALTH AND FIT- NESS CENTER TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST IN THE C-2 ZONE AND TO ESTABLISH PARKING STANDARDS FOR SAID USE, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated October 16, 1989. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. -Coming forward to speak were: Shane McColgan - 1155- 7th Street - applicant Dr. Kaufman - 901 Hermosa Ave. rep. South Bay Kung -Fu Wilma Burt - 1152- 7th Street The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To send this item back to the Planning Commis- sion with the sentiments of Council. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. A recess was called at 8:55 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:10 P.M. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR CLEANING OF DOWNTOWN SIDEWALKS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 20, 1989. CONTINUED FROM 10/10/89 MTG. Supplemental letter from H.B. Restaurant & Tavern Owners Assn. dated October 10, 1989. Action: To approve staff recommendation: 1) proceed on a program to clean the downtown sidewalks based on the proposed maintenance schedule and evaluate after one year; 2) authorize staff to negotiate a firm cost with Manhattan Beach; and 3) authorize a budget amendment to reflect a revenue increase of $4,000 from the Chamber of Commerce to the Street Maintenance Division; and look at other streets: 2nd Street, 8th Street, 14th Street, 15th Street and 22nd Street. Also request that the Chamber fulfill their commitment to steam clean or clean the sidewalks after each Fiesta. Motion Williams, second Sheldon. So ordered. 7. REPORT ON PERMITTING RECYCLERS IN CITY. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated October 16, 1989. A staff report was presented by Director Grove. Action: To receive and file the report. Staff to look into making legal "salvaging". Motion Sheldon, second Williams. So ordered. 8. REVIEW OF INTERIM REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Ala- na Mastrian-Handman dated October 12, 1989. Action: To receive and file report. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. A recess was called at 11:20 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 11:30 P.M. 9. REPORT ON RELOCATION OF CITY YARD. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated October 17, 1989. Addressing the Council on this item were: Wilma Burt - 1152- 7th Street MaryLou Weiss - 2506 Ardmore 9 Proposed Action: To receive and file report. Motion Williams, second Simpson. Noting the objections of Creighton, Rosenberger, and Sheldon - motion fails. Action: To have the Environmental Impact Report con- sider including changes in impacts associated with the moving of oil separation tanks from South School site to the City Maintenance Yard. Amendment to Motion: That the report also look at the impacts of moving the City Yard to the Community Center or the Self Storage site south of City Hall. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. Amendment accepted by maker and second. So ordered. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Recommendation on organization of General Services and Code Enforcement function. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated October 18, 1989. A staff report was presented by Manager Northcraft. Action: To continue this item. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. So ordered. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Appointment of sub -committee to review City Manager em- ployment agreement and approval of revised performance evaluation form. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated October 4, 1989. CONTINUED FROM 10/10/89 MTG. Action: To appoint as the subcommittee evaluation form. Motion Rosenberger, Councilmembers Creighton and Sheldon and approve the revised performance second Creighton. So ordered. (b) Report on parking studies done by City during the past five years. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated October 19, 1989. Action: To continue this item. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. 11. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request of Councilmember Simpson regarding public post- ing of City Council Closed Session agenda. Action: This item was continued. (b) Request of Mayor Williams for discussion of requiring conditional use permit for new commercial developments such as hotels. Action: This item was continued. (c) Request by Mayor Pro Tem Creighton for discussion of construction site enforcement. (d) Action: This item was continued. Request by Councilmember Sheldon for discussion re. zoning standards in residential zones, i.e., lot coverage, parking, setbacks, etc.; and height limit, setbacks, parking and bulk in commercial zones. Action: This item was continued. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Gerry Compton - re: 11(d) zoning standards- requested that the Council make no further changes at this time. ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, October 25, 1989, at the hour of 12:23 A.M., to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tues- day, November 14, 1989 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Ka hleen Midstokke, City Clerk November 7, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council November 14, 1989 SUBJECT: PROCESSING OIL PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS INITIATED BY STAFF PURPOSE: TO EXAMINE THE APPROPRIATE APPROACH TO CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, AND FINALIZING THE NECESSARY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, TEXT AMENDMENTS, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP). Recommendation Staff recommends the following: 1. Provide 3 week public review and hold final public hearing on only the EIR before Planning Commission at first January meeting, and send to City Council for joint City Council/School District public hearing at second City Council January meeting. 2. Hold General Plan amendment and text amendments at scheduled 1st quarter General Plan public hearing, March 6th before Planning Commission and April 10th before City Council. 3. Based on final plan and EIR, approve CUP and lease agreement at a publicly noticed date. Background Originally, it was intended that the Planning Commission hold a public hearing on the EIR, text amendment, and CUP at one time , and that the matter would next be publicly heard at a joint City Council/School District meeting. At the October 24, 1989 City Council meeting, the City Council directed the consultants, Ultrasystems, to include in the EIR two alternative locations for the City Yard, and elimination of oil separation tanks from the south School Site. Also certain required information from Macpherson Oil and others is not yet available. Further, The Planning Staff and the City Attorney believe that it is necessary to have not only a zoning text amendment but also a General Plan text amendment for implementation of the Propositions P & Q which were voted upon in 1984 by the public. It is believed that some language needs to be included in the General Plan regarding allowing oil production at the South - 1 - 11 School Site and the City Yard. Consequently, this matter should be considered with the first quarter General Plan amendments in 1990. These new factors have necessitated a change in the schedule as to how to proceed in finalizing this matter. Analysis On November 8th the Planning Commission finalized public input concerning comments to the responses. However, because of the needed additional data, the consultant will need until December 15th to finalize responses to the comments to the responses, and provide analysis for the above noted items requested by the City Council. Therefore, in detail, the following process should take place: December 15th to January 3rd -- Final Draft EIR made available to public. January 3rd -- Planning Commission to consider certification of the EIR and add any necessary conditions including further analysis and public review if ultimately either of the two alternative City Yard sites are chosen. Approximately January 23rd -- Joint Meeting of the School District / City Council to take public input and request any changes in EIR. Approximately February 13th -- School District / City Council certify EIR. Early February -- Start finalizing negotiations on final arrangements with school district and Macpherson Oil, based on EIR information. March 6th -- Public hearing before Planning Commission for General Plan amendment and text amendments. April 10th -- City Council public hearing on General Plan amendment and text amendments. Approximately early May -- Based on the final plan decisions and EIR, approve lease agreement if appropriate and CUP. This plan allows the bodies to have the benefit of a certified EIR to arrive at the final arrangements that will optimize benefits and mitigate negative impacts to the best extent possible. It is beneficial to have the CUP, as the final step, since it functions as an implementing tool for all the necessary conditions that need to be imposed to mitigate the negative impacts which the project may have. 2 Alternatives 1. Hold public hearing before Planning Commission EIR, General Plan amendment, text amendment, and CUP at same time on 1st quarter General Plan schedule; public hearing before Planning Commission would be held on March 6th, and April 10th the public hearing before City Council would be held. 2. As in No. 1 above, hold public hearing all at the same time, but schedule sooner than March 6th, when whole matter is ready to be heard.1 Resp smi Ce > CONCUR: Michael Schubach evin B. Northcraft Planning Director City Manager t/ccsreir 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Michael Schubach, Planning Director SUBJECT: Schedule for Processing Oil Drilling Environmen- tal Impact Report (EIR) DATE: November 14, 1989 Today we received the information from Ultrasystems concerning their ability to produce the additional data needed for the EIR. According to their memorandum FAXED to use this evening, they are not able to provide the information until January 17, 1990 (Please refer to attached memo). Therefore, we are recommending the City Council proceed as noted in the agenda item #11, however, the dates noted will need to be changed. A meeting is scheduled with Macpherson Oil and Ultrasystems for tomorrow, November. 15, 1989, which will then allow us to deter- mine the precise dates as to when we will be able to finish pro- cessing the EIR, text amendment and Conditional Use Permit. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 111 ULTRASYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL legPSERVICESIWINA HADSON COMPANY November 13, 1989 Mr. Michael Schubach Planning Director NOV 1 3 1989 City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Re: Responses to Additional Environmental Related Concerns on Oil Recovery Project Raised During November 8 Public Hearing Dear Mr. Schubach: Upon review and evaluation of the specific areas of concern raised during the public hearing on November 8; and after discussions with the project applicant concerning availability of specific project design and operational details necessary to support subsequent environmental analyses, it is our opinion that documentation of the analysis results (Responses and/or Finalization of DEIR) will not be available for your review and distribution prior to January 17, 1990. Please take this date into consideration during preparation of your project review process schedule. Very truly yours, ULTRASYSTEMS Director Environmental Services CDS:bt 4287/86 80d ££c?..# 000L—£98—PTL #XHJ : ON 131 3N I i I SW31SASH81111: a 1017 : LT NOW 68,-0-00N November 8, 1989 City Council Meeting November 14, 1989 Mayor and Members of the City Council ROTATION OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEM AND CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION - NOVEMBER 1989 Consistent with the City Council policy of a nine-month rotation of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore, the following appointments should be made: 1. Mayor for a term ending August 14, 1989. 2. Mayor Pro Tempore for a term ending August 14, 1989. Recommendations after appointment of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore are: 1. To appoint the Mayor delegate and Mayor Pro Tempore alternate to the city selection committee of SCRTD, and to adopt Resolution No. 89- entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A MEMBER OF SAID COUNCIL OF SAID CITY TO THE CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT.DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO PART 3 OF DIVISION 10 OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE." 2. To appoint the Mayor to the Los Angeles County/City Selection Committee. 3. To appoint the Mayor to the South Bay Cities Sanitation District Board of Directors, and Mayor Pro Tem alternate director. 4. To appoint the Mayor as delegate and Mayor Pro Tem as alternate to the Inglewood Fire Training Authority. (They meet immediately following the Sanitation District meeting.) Enclosed for your information are current committee assignments as of March 28, 1989. The remainder of the assignments may be made at the City Council meeting of November 28, 1989. Attached is a previous memo regarding mandatory appointments for your review. CONCUR: KA HLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk KEVIN B. NORTHC FT, CITY MANAGER 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A MEMBER OF SAID COUNCIL OF SAID CITY TO THE CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO PART 3 OF DIVISION 10 OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to the Southern California Rapid Transit District Law, being Part 3 of Division 10 of the Public Utilities Code of the State of California, the City Council does hereby appoint the following member of said Council as a member to the City Selection Committee: Delegate: Mayor Creighton Alternate: Mayor Pro Tempore Sheldon SECTION 2. That the within resolution shall become operative and the appointment made by Section 1 hereof shall be effective as of November 14, 1989. SECTION 3. That immediately after the effective date of the appointment hereby made, the City Clerk shall without delay forward a copy of this resolution, together with notice of the appointment made hereby, to the Secretary of the Southern Calif- ornia Rapid Transit District. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution; shall cause the action of the City Council in adopting same to be entered in the official minutes of said City Council; and shall retain this resolution, duly signed by the proper City officials in the official records of the City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY November 2, 1989 Honorable Mayor City Council meeting and Members of City Council of November 14, 1989 ANALYSIS OF VASEK POLAK BMW COMPLAINTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND At the City Council meeting of August 8, 1989, the City Council directed that a CUP revocation hearing be scheduled before the Planning Commission regarding the Vasek Polak BMW Dealership. The action was taken in response to continuing complaints from an organization called "Citizens Concern Group", represented by Michael Pitton. The group is comprised of residents in close proximity to the dealership. A list of complaints was read to the City Council with a written copy subsequently submitted on September 6, 1989 by Michael Pitton. A CUP revocation hearing was scheduled for October 17, 1989 along with concurrent hearings requesting CUP amendments and a zone variance. Those hearings were continued to the Planning Commis- sion meeting of November 21, 1989. ANALYSIS The staff report prepared for the Planning Commission revocation hearing is attached which addresses the CUP and Development Agreement issues. Issues which were raised with respect to street vacations were not addressed in the Planning Commission report as they were not germane to the CUP revocation hearing. A concern was raised with respect to an expected financial pay- back of $250,000 annually in increased sales tax revenue. Resolution 85-4863, which amended the circulation element by or- dering the vacation of the alley to the west of the dealership, contained language indicating that a "financial payback" of an additional $250,000 annually in sales tax be placed within the development agreement. The basis for the language regarding a financial payback ap- parently resulted from a memo from then city manager, Gregory T. Meyer discussing the assumption of increased sales tax revenue. The memo indicated the assumption was based on expanded auto dealerships in both the northern and southern portions of the city. At the time, Vasek Polak was contemplating expanding both the BMW dealership and the Porsche/Audi dealership. Expansion of the Porshe/Audi dealership was not pursued. The financial payback provision was not included in the provi- sions of the development agreement approved by the city council. All of the material available, including Resolution 85-4863, was presented to the city council when the development agreement was considered so apparently the omission was intentional. An additional $250,000 in sales tax was simply not a reasonable assumption, in any case, for the improvements proposed. It is unlawful to disclose individual sales tax figures; however such an increase would have well exceeded a 100% increase in sales tax revenue. Dollar volume of sales have increased approximately 18% since the approval of the development agreement. Regarding the vacation of the alley between Longfellow and Thir- tieth St., Resolution 85-4864 ordering such vacation did not in- dicate any financial payback. There is no evidence that the vacations were processed in any manner other than that prescribed by law. Concur: Respectfully submitted, William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety evin B. Northctaft City Manager CITIZENS CONCERN GROUP 30TH STREET...CITIZENS CONCERN, GROUP 30TH STREET. JULY 14,1989. THE HONORABLE JUNE WILLIAMS MAYOR,CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, CITY HALL,1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH,CA 90254. RE: RESIDENTS VS VASEK POLAK CORP. MN/MP DEAR MADAM MAYOR & COUNCILMEMEERS, • .3 1J 1 1' AS CHAIRMAN OF THE "CITIZENS CONCERN GROUP 30TH ST":ONCE AGAIN,I COME TO YOU WITH THE FEELING OF OUR RESIDENTS,THEIR OUTRAGE,THEIR INDIGNA- TION TOWARD A SITUATION THAT YOUR ADMINISTRATION HAS NOT ONLY ILLEGALY PERMITTED BY LACK OF ADEQUATE SURVEY OR CONCERN FOR THE WELL BEING OF YOUR FAVORITE TAXPAYER BUT HAS ALSO ENCOURAGED TO OCCUR BY ITS REPEATED LENIENCY FOR THE APPLICATION OF OUR LAWS AND RESPECT FOR OUR RESIDENTS. FOR TWO YEARS,WE HAVE COME TO YOU WITH OUR JUSTIFIED GRIEVANCES AND AS- KED YOU TO ONLY APPLY THE LAW AND ENFORCE IT.IN RETURN,WE WERE OFFERED KIND WORDS AND PROMESSES,MEETING THROUGH YOUR CITY MANAGER WHO THOUGHT WITH A CHILDISH ARROGANCE THAT TIME WILL COOL US DOWN 'IWHILE HE WAS STREN- GHTENING HIS RELATIONSHIP AND CONSOLIDATE HIS POWER OVER THE CITY.TO THIS DAY,THE ONLY RESULT WE HAVE SEEN HAS BEEN THE DETERMINATION OF ONE MAN, ON HIS OWN,WHO HAS MADE OUR STREET PARKING MORE EASY.THAT MAN: DENNIS SHORDER IS THE ONLY ONE AND FOR THIS DESERVES OUR THANKS AND RESPECT. BUT FOR YOUR ADMINISTRATION MADAM WE HAVE RECEIVED WORDS,PROMESSES, CONCERN AND WIDE UNDERSTANDING,YOU HAVE EVEN SENT A LETTER TO MR VASEK TO COMPLY BUT AT THE SAME TIME YOU HAVE MADE SURE THAT IT WAS NOT•ENFOR- CEABLE AND TIME RESUMED FOR YOU AS PEACEFULL AS EVER.YOU EVEN GAVE VASEK A CEREMONY TO REWARD HIM OF HIS DEDICATION TO HERMOSA.YOU COULD NOT PREVENT HIM OF DOING ANYTHING HE WISHED BUT YOU COULD STOP IN ONE DAY THE BUILDING OF OUR EMERGENCY SERVICE! YOU COULD STOP ANYBODY WILLING TO REMODEL A SMALL HOUSE,BUT YOU COULD NOT STOP HIM TO TRANSFORME ILLEGALY THE "BORELLI RESTAURANT"! YOU COULD RUINE ANYBODY IN THE WAY OF YOUR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BUT YOU MADE SURE THAT VASEK DIDN'T HAVE TO RESPE: HIS C.U.P,HIS BUILDING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NOR PAY FOR THE REQUIRED PERMIT,YOU GAVE HIM ONE ALLEY IN VIOLATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODE UNDER THE FALSE PRETENSE THAT IT WILL BRING TO US :250.000$ REVENUES! WE DO NOT HAVE A CITY HALL,WE HAVE A COMIC OPERA HOUSE AND OUR MOTTO HAS BECAME: "NO SHAME". WE REQUEST THAT YOU PUT THE RENEWAL OF THE BUILDING AGREEMENT OF THE VASEK POLAK CORPORATION ON THE NEXT AGENDA FOR PUBLIC MEETING AND HEARING CONCERNING THE VIOLATIONS TOWARD OUR LAWS,C.U.P & DEVELOP AGREEMENT AND LET'S ONE FOR ALL AND IN PUBLIC PLAY THE "DIVINE COMEDY OF DEMOCRACY". PLEASE RECEIVE MADAM p-Y'IiINCERE SALUTATIONS. N ft MICHAITTON - v CHAIaIAN CITIZENS CONCERN GROUP. VASEK POLAK BMW - 2901 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY List of complaints submitted to Kevin B. Northcraft, Monday, September 6, 1989 by Michael Pitton. This printed list is a reproduction of the original handwritten list. 1) Parking employees and customers A - Violation of Development Agreement, item b, line 9, 4. B - pg. giolation No. 86976928 - requiring employer to provide parking. 2) Car Carriers 1 - Violation of 8-5.9 Zoning Ordinance. Memo of 12-13-88 by City Mgr to Vasek. 2 - Letter from City Mgr May 15/89 stating racks will be removed by June 89. 3) Unloading equipment, towed cars, deliveries. - Violation of Development Agreement item G, line 3, pg 5 "no 30th St. delivery" 4) Development Agreement 1) Fees never paid (1500) See complaint by Kathy Midstokke letter to City Mgr. 8-12-86. This is a violation of City Regulations and also violation of Development Agreement p 6, line 9 "no waiver of standard, fees and review" 5) Loud paging system Violation of 1969 C.U.P. Violation 1969 P.C.154-762, item 1 Violation 1969 P.C.154-706, item 8 Violation Development Agreement pg 5, item i, line 10 Violation C.U.P. Article 8 6) Alarm Demo - Violation C.U.P. - Violation P.C. 154-762 pg 1, item 2 (no noises) - Violation of P.C. 154-706 pg 1, item 4 (no display) 7) Test driving - Violation C.U.P. PC 154-706 "no display" - Violation Development Agreement pg 4, item D, line 15 (no road testing) - Violation Ordinance 86-830 pg 2, line 6 8) Vacations of Alleys Gould - 30th - We contest validity of legality of closure - We contest the fulfillment of financial payback a year in sales taxes" - We request that City Council will be shown proof financial payback to the city. 1986 9 1989 = 3 years = 250,000 X 3 = 750,000 to "+$250,000 of the City! We contest also the closing of alley between longfellow and 30th. - deal? - financial payback? reasons? This was done in the only interest of One party Vasek. 9) Business hours to be stictly respected 7am - 8pm week 8am - 7pm weekend and not like today from 7am to past 9pm which is more than 14 hours daily. END 12, 1989 October Planning Meeting Co Octobe n 17, 1989 AL USE PERMIT FOR TBE 3LEDEAL SBIP AT ;OAST losaDIAT t agreement are not enforceable lion; however complaints relative .ssed here as staff is s be included in a new he entire area of BMW operation. :s submitted by Michael Pitton, •oup 30th Street": ting Commiss ion 3iteOns from theexisting development agreement in a new Delude ieXpanded area establishment for compliance with eting• ix months from this me the operation ors °f is regarding d association plaints a neighborhood Street", beh the Beed that a hearing of the �lr to consider revocation �n has attemptedresolve concerns ociatiOn' ome concerns appear to others remain. submitted .tO the d July ,14 , 1989 tt bmi submitted a .ate nager Kevin B. Michael �nts . Che paned unedited, T included in the 1989. The is itten on the mobile which place con They are as follows gents dealership. nal use permit for the pacific ng a conditional c di sales business t used d March 17 , 1969. for the 1 use permit st Highway. conditional Pacific Coa i caralot at 3009 Pa ent NO. 86'976928 with 1969• ed April 15, 1986' ent recorded as DOcum unty Recorder. Adopt Diners - .ackground material for yee and customer parking is d west of the former alley. are only recently completed; 'or customer parking and new to reet was a previous complaint ;hip by instructing the is unknown where the ey are not parking on site )se driving "demo" cars. parking on Thirtieth a Beach residential !quire parking spaces to be area ratios. The s of this or any other use should be available for could mean no storage of 'ea. A revised condition orage area for vehicles o level car carriers le used car lot. definition of structure (9), must be setback Idential property a the two level car owever a variance is -equest section). Thirtieth Street - the issue of )(g) of the lership is "to make on-site and off-site, the prohibition of deliveries occurring on 30th Street, and attempt to make deliveries at the Saab Dealership in Manhattan Beach." Transport truck deliveries are not occurring on 30th Street; however some other deliveries may occur there. It is staffs opinion that the condition refers to "transport truck deliveries" due to the problem of street blockage. Deliveries by small vehicles, legally parked, should pose no problem; however they could be accommodated on site. A revised condition should clarify the delivery issue. 4) Development Agreement Fees Not Paid - A $1500.00 fee was paid to process the development agreement by Vasek Polak Enterprises as evidenced by receipt #4094 dated February 28, 1986. 5) Loud Paging System - Both conditional use permit resolutions prohibit "loud or obnoxious noise" and the C.U.P. for the used car facility also prohibits "outside speakers or amplified telephone bells'. The development agreement indicates the dealership is "to make provisions for minimizing any noise including but not limited to outdoor loud speakers, bells, buzzers, and similar noise." The dealership did utilize outside loud speakers for paging salesman, etc. in the past. A site inspection revealed that the loudspeakers have been removed and paging was only barely audible if standing close to the building since all loudspeakers are now inside the structure. For future compliance, staff would recommend a condition that references the noise standards contained in Chapter 19.5 H.B.M.C. to alleviate any ambiguity as to what constitutes a "loud or obnoxious noise". 6) Alarm demonstrations - See section under Loud Paging System for noise restrictions. Since car alarms are part of the product the dealership sells, it would seem unreasonable to totally ban any alarm demonstrations. Alarm demonstrations could be limited to reasonable hours (i.e. between 9 am and 6 pm) to minimize disturbances to adjacent residents. Staff has not observed any car alarm demonstrations so the frequency and duration of demonstrations is unknown. 7 Test driving on residential streets - The conditional use permits are silent regarding test. driving. The development agreement indicates the dealership is "to not road test any vehicles on local residential streets within the City of Hermosa Beach. Residential streets are those defined in the Circulation Element to the General Plan of the City". Road testing has not been observed by staff during several inspections of the site; however it has been a consistent and recurring complaint of area residents. The city has provided the dealership with a reproducable map indicating acceptable test routes (arterials and collectors). The dealership is to inform mechanics and potential buyers of acceptable routes on which to test cars. In an effort to reinforce the condition it is recommended that signs be posted in both the sales area and repair area indicating the allowable routes for road testing vehicles. 8) Vacation of Alleys - In conjunction with the development agreement adopted in 1986 the city council ordered the vacation of a portion of the alley paralleling Pacific Coast Highway and bisecting property owned by the dealership. The vacation was accomplished in conformance with state and local laws. 9) Business hours - The conditional use permit for the used car lot indicates "hours of operation from 8:00 am to 9:00 pm". The conditional use permit for the new car sales facility indicates "hours of operation for service of customers cars shall not exceed 8:00 am to 6:00 pm weekdays, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm on Saturdays, and no repair on Sundays". The development agreement indicates the dealership is "to limit all auto repair activities to between the hours of 7.:00 am and 9:00 pm on week days and 8:00 am and 1:00 pm on Saturdays; no auto repair activities on Sunday and no auto repairs may be done after hours unless all doors and windows are closed". Section 11 of the development agreement provides that any rule or regulation in conflict with the provisions of the agreement are repealed or modified to conform to the provisions of the agreement. The conditional use permit should therefore be modified to conform to the hours of operation limitation contained in the development agreement. The establishment's advertised hours of operation for the service department are 7:30 am to 5 pm Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday and 7:30 am to 7:30 pm on Thursdays. No violation of the hours of operation were observed by staff. ADDITIONAL ITEMS OF CONCERN Other issues which have been raised in addition to those indicated in the list include: 1) The unauthorized expansion onto the former Borellis restaurant site for parts warehouse purposes. The appropriate amendment has been requested by the dealership and is to be considered by the Planning Commission concurrently with this matter. 2) Lights from the dealership fall on residential property. The complaint involves the new car facility whose conditional use permit does not address the issue. It is recommended that an appropriate condition be included in a new conditional use permit to require shielding of security lighting so that light does not fall directly on residential property. SUMMARY Staff does not feel that the current manner in which the dealership is operating warrants the drastic action of revoking the conditional use permit. A new conditional use permit should be approved which omits unnecessary conditions, incorporates all applicable conditions in a single document and clarifies the requirements. Respectfully submitted, a) 6, William Grove Director of Bldg. & Safety l0 (b) Letter from Michael Pitton, Chairman, Citizens Concern Group 30th Street, dated July 14, 1989 re. Vasek Polak Corporation operations. (Requested by Mayor Williams.) Supplemental letter from residents 737, 739 - 30th Street. Supplemental memorandum from Building and Safe- ty Director William Grove dated August 3, 1989. A staff report was presented by Director Grove. Addressing the Council on this item were: Michael Pitton - Citizens Concerns - 30th Street Jim Deutsch - 707- 30th Street Direction was given by the Mayor to: Refer to the Planning Commission next meeting for the setting of a date for a hearing for revocation of Condi- tional Use Permit with proper notice. Staff to check on issues raised by residents tonight. Staff to check on increase in sales tax revenue since Development Agree- ment. A recess was called at 9:25 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 9:35 P.M. (I SCRIPT FOR ROTATION OF MAYOR 1. OUTGOING MAYOR WILLIAMS' COMMENTS 2. MOTIONS TO APPOINT ROGER CREIGHTON AS MAYOR AND CHUCK SHEL- DON AS MAYOR PRO TEM FOR TERMS ENDING JULY 10, 1990. 3. SWAP SEATS AND NAMEPLATES - NEW SEATING (LEFT TO RIGHT) JW - JR - RC - CS - ES (JR & ES DON'T MOVE) 4. PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE TO OUTGOING MAYOR WILLIAMS BY NEW MAYOR ROGER CREIGHTON 5. INCOMING MAYOR CREIGHTON'S COMMENTS 6. MOTIONS TO...(4 ACTIONS RECOMMENDED IN CITY CLERK'S MEMO): A. Appoint the Mayor delegate and Mayor Pro Tempore 1� alternate to the city selection committee of the CRTD; B. Appoint Mayor tt e LosAgeles County/City Selection Committee; ilxi)1° C. Appoint the Mayor to the South Bay Sanitation District Board of Direc ors, an Mayor Pro Tem alternate director; ia, 7, D. Appoint Mayor as delegate and Mayor Pro Tem as alternate to the Inglewood Fire Training Authority. (They meet immediately following the Sanitation District meeting.) 7. MAYOR TO ANNOUNCE THAT HE WOULD APPRECIATE NEW COUNCIL TO SUBMIT THEIR PREFERENCES FOR COMMITTEE AND LIAISON ASSIGN- MENTS AND HE WILL HAVE READY FOR FUTURE MEETING. 8. REFER TO AGENDA - CONSENT CALENDAR Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 28, 1989 November 8, 1989 City Council Meeting of November 14, 1989 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Responsible Agent Canvass of votes and installation of officers RFP for design of basketball courts, CIP 89-512 Presentation of fire flow consultant's report Recommendation re. upgrading vs. installing a new system, Community Center fire alarm system CIP 89-615 Report on purchase of Greenbelt Video sales in the C-2 zone Recommendation on prosecutor for bootlegs Fireworks ordinance December 9, 1989 Goal setting session December 12, 1989 Circulation element Unreinforced masonry building hazard mitigation program Conditional Use Permit and Text amendment Renewal of property insurance January 9, 1990 Ordinance for traffic code update Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Public Works Director Public Safety Director Public Works Director City Manager Planning Director Building Director Public Safety Director City Manager Planning Director Building Director Planning Director Risk Manager Public Works Director Public Safety Director 1 C Highland Avenue CIP 85-102 Valley & 24th St January 23, 1990 Certification of - accept as complete reet, red curb study oil drilling EIR Consideration of Bikeway on Valley Dr. February 13, 1990 Sewer bond analysis Presentation of Parks and Rec. Master Plan Public Works Director Public Works Director Planning Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Community Resources ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared CIP 88-406 Call for Bids - Sewers Target Area 4 Slurry sealing, call for bids CIP 89-170 Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Power Street drainage and grading Vehicle parking on pedestrian streets Approval of County -wide Hazardous Waste Plan Definition of hardship for fee waiver Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Value of open space for Park Dedication in lieu fee New marquee proposal Sidewalk repairs Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Public Works Director Works Director Building Planning Planning Building Director Director Director Director Community Resources Public Works Director ***************************************************************** 2 Initiated by Party Date Council n 11 8/22 Bus bench & shelter design & locations Sidewalks for Safe School Rte. Recom. 9/12 Setting of joint meeting w/Planning Commission 9/12 Report on results of 6th St. storm drain cleaning City Mgr. 10/9 Public Works Director Public Works Director City Manager Public Works Director Intro. of new canine officer & acknowledgment of latest donations Public 10/12 Consideration of citizen survey as tool for goal setting Gyms in C-2, parking requirement review Council 10/24 City Mgr. 11/7 Revision of Handbill ordinance Safety Director City Manager Planning Director Public Safety Director November 2, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council November 14, 1989 (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 17, 1989) SUBJECT: PROCEDURES AND FEES INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO ESTABLISH THE PROCESS AND THE FEES FOR EXCEPTION REQUESTS FROM THE NEW NONCONFORMING ORDINANCE AS ALLOWED BY SECTIONS 13-3 (A), 13-7 (B), AND 13-7 (C) Recommendation Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution. Background The City Council, at their September 26, 1989 meeting, adopted Ordinance No. 89-1008 amending the provisions for expansion and remodeling of nonconforming uses and structures. Said ordinance includes provisions which allow certain exceptions to the rules for remodeling and expansion, if approved by the Planning Commission. The City Council, at their October 17, 1989 meeting, continued this item for staff to modify the proposed method for review of exception requests because it did not seem necessary to require a public hearing, public noticing in the newspaper, and noticing of residents and property owners within a 300 foot radius, for projects of this type. Analysis When the new ordinance becomes effective, Section 13-3 (A) of the zoning ordinance will allow the Planning Commission to approve demolitions of walls and floor area for nonconforming uses above 107. Section 13-7 (B) will allow the Planning Commission to approve expansions of nonconforming structures to exceed 5070 of replacement value, but no more than 100%. Section 13-7 (C) will allow the Planning Commission to approve expansions of nonconforming sideyards of 3 feet or greater, if 7570 of the block has the same nonconformity. All of these exceptions are contingent upon the Planning Commission making a determination that the goals, and the purpose and intent of the ordinance are being met. 1 11 The attached resolution would establish the procedure for review of these exceptions to be the same as the procedure for a Conditional Use Permit, as contained in Article 14 of the zoning ordinance, with the added provision that public noticing, and noticing of property owners and residents within a 300 foot radius shall not be required, unless deemed necessary by the Planning Commission. The only requirement would be the posting of the subject property. As such, the total cost to an applicant would be the $320 fee, and no additional expense would be required for noticing of property owners and residents. The application would be considered at a hearing by the Planning Commission. CO/ /46 NCUR:. 4/ /f‘ Michael Schubach Planning Director Kevin Northcraft' City Manager Attachments: 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Ordinance No. 89-1008 p/ccsrpdp x'/i4t en Ro•ertson Associate Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF REQUESTS FOR EXCEPTIONS, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13-3 (A), 13-7 (B), AND 13-7(C) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS REGARDING THE REMODELING AND EXPANSION OF NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES WHEREAS, Section 13-3 (A), amended by Ordinance No. 89-1008 adopted on September 26, 1989, regarding the provision for expansion of nonconforming uses and buildings allows the Planning Commission to approve demolitions of walls and floor area of a nonconforming use to exceed 10%, Section 13-7 (B) allows the Planning Commission to approve expansions of greater than 50%, but no more than 100%, of the replacement value of nonconforming structures, and Section 13-7 (C) allows the Commission to approve expansions of a wall with a nonconforming sideyard of more than 3 feet, if 75% of the block has the same nonconformity, and; WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary that procedural requirements and fees for requests for the aforementioned exceptions to the nonconforming provisions of the zoning ordinance be set forth: NOW THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: A. The Planning Department shall accept applications for exceptions from the zoning ordinance, pursuant to Sections 13-3 (A), 13-7 (B), and 13-7 (C) of the zoning ordinance, with the procedure set forth in Article 14, Division 2, for Conditional Use Permits; B. The Planning Department shall schedule the request for hearing by the Planning Commission; C. Notice of the pending hearing shall be posted on the subject property at least 10 days prior to the scheduled date for said hearing. Noticing in the local newspaper and noticing of property owners and residents within a 300 foot radius shall not be required unless deemed necessary by the Planning Commission upon review of the application. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 D. The fee for an application for an exception to the nonconforming provisions of the zoning ordinance shall be the same as is required for a Conditional Use Permit. E. To approve a request for. exceptions to the nonconforming provisions, the Planning. Commission must find that the proposal clearly meets the goals, intent, and purpose of Article 13; the proposal will not be detrimental to adjacent property owners; and other reasonable alternatives are not available to the applicant which could accomplish the expansion within the standards of Article 13. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby set forth the above procedure for applying for exceptions to Sections 13-3 (A), 13-7 (B), and 13-7 (C) of the zoning ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this November, 1989. day of PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: (fae CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY p/ccrspdp November 8, 1989 City Council Meeting November 14, 1989 Mayor and Members of the City Council VACANCY IN THE OFFICE OF CITY CLERK Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council consider an adjustment in salary for the office of the City Clerk. A vacancy will occur on November 28 when the Clerk officially takes office as a Councilmember. The newly seated City Council must fill the vacancy by appointment or call an election within thirty (30) days of the vacancy. It seems appropriate that a review of the current salary should be made prior to the vacancy. The current salary is $1000/mo, and was established June, 1987. A reasonable amount to consider might be 1/2 of the Chief Deputy City Clerk's salary, with adjustments as deemed appropriate. Attached is the current salary resolution for the City Clerk with a description of duties; and also the current salary range for the Deputy. This position is also eligible for 10% Premium Pay. G�l /eAl40 KathleenMidstokke,CClerk ity 9 #-/P.c.:) / Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88-5155 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE COMPENSATION TO BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY CLERK AND PROVIDING A JOB DESCRIPTION FOR SUCH COMPENSATION. WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the compensation for the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the matter of staffing and other job related duties have been reviewed by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to Ordinance No. 78-603 of the City Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, adopted December 14, 1978, the compensation of the City Clerk shall be fixed by a Resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall receive a salary of= One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per month payable semi- monthly at the same time and in the same manner as the salaries paid to each of the officers and employees of the City. SECTION 3. That the duties of the City Clerk shall be usual and statutory duties (excluding elections) including the duties specifically described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and titled "Partial List of City Clerk's Duties". SECTION 4. That said compensation as set forth in Section 2 of this Resolution shall be in full force and effect beginning 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 July 1, 1988 and remain in full force until such time as this Resolution is amended or repealed. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall be eligible for the same insurance and retirement benefits as the City Council. SECTION 5. That this Resolution supersedes City Council Resolution No. 87-5043 adopted June 9, 1987. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June, 1987. PRESIDE o the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, Calif. ATTEST: 4a vl& )0r2r CITY CLERK APPROVED AFORM: Y ATT • - NE 2 PARTIAL LIST OF CITY CLERK'S DUTIES 1. Maintain custody of records. 2. Index and file City records and prepare certified copies. 3. Serve as Clerk of the Council (attend all Regular, Special and Adjourned meetings and workshops, sign documents and agreements, record votes cast and conditions stipulated, follow-up action of Council to City staff, prepare Chamber for each meeting.) 4. Maintain record of the proceedings of City Council meetings. 5. Attest, publish, post, index and file Ordinances and Resolutions. 6. Maintain custody of City Seal. 7. Administer and file Oaths of Office. 8. Administer oaths,. affirmations and acknowledgements. 9. Receive petitions relating to Initiatives, Referendums or Recalls. 10. Attest and accept subpoenas. 11. Perform duties concerning Street and Easement vacations. 12. Perform duties concerning liens, encroachments and release of liens. 13. Receive claims and perform duties concerned therewith. 14. Give notice of Public Hearings, supervise all legal noticing for City, contract with newspaper for publications. 15. Receive and open bids. 16. Record with the County Recorder such documents as are required to be recorded. 17. Assist citizens regarding record requests, City Council meeting procedures, claims and various other matters. 18. Conduct research, assemble data and prepare reports, drafts, memoranda, correspondence as may be directed by the City Council or City Manager. r,,U4 44. asa • . 19. Administration of City Clerk's Department. 20. Preparation of City Clerk and Election budgets. 21. Maintain, supplement and duplicate City Code books. 22. Other statutory duties pursuant to State law transferred to the Finance Director. and Zoning Code except those 23. Appoint deputies. 24. Filing officer for disclosure and campaign statements per Fair Political Practices Commission. 25. Responsible for proper posting of agendas for meetings under the Brown Act. 26. Serve as Parliamentarian to City Council. 27. Receive and process Written Communications from the Public. ftw • CITY CLERK - DUTIES REQUIRED BY LAW: The statutes of the State prescribe the basic functions and duties of city clerks in general law cities. The Government Code provides that the city clerk shall perform such additional duties as are prescribed by ordinance. Thus, the duties and responsibilities of city clerks are not necessarily the same even in general law cities, and each city clerk is subject to the exact requirements of his own city. The following statutory duties performed by California city clerks are listed by section title and State Code reference. You may want to refer to the City Clerks Handbook prepared by the League of California Cities and the California State Code for more detailed information on each subject: 1. Maintain custody of records. (Gov. C. S§34090.5, 36520, 40801, 40806, 40808) • a. Certification of copies. b. Indexing and filing. 2. Serve as Clerk of the Council. (Gov. C. SS 36804, 36814) 3. Record and maintain proceedings of Council meetings. (Gov. C. SS 36814, 40801) a. Attest adjournment; declare adjournment if quorum not present. (Gov. C. S 54955 et seq.) 4. Attest, publish, index, file ordinances. (Gov. C. SS 36932, 36933, 40806) a. Attest, index, file resolutions. 5. Maintain custody of City Seal. (Gov. C. S 40811) 6. Administer and file Oaths of Office. (Gov. C-.. SS 3102, 36507) 7. Administer oaths, affirmations and acknowledgements. (Gov. C. S 40814) a. Oath of disaster service. (Gov. C. S 36900) 8. Conduct elections. (Gov. C. S 36900; Elec. C. 22800 et seq. and throughout) 9. Receive petitions relating to initiative, referendum or recall. (Elec. C. SS4001 et seq.) 10. Countersign general obligation bonds. (Gov. C. S 43623) 11. Attest to subpoenas. (Gov. C. S 37105) 12. File Affidavit of Completion. (Gov. C. S 34080) 13. Pile name change instrument for various purposes. (Gov. C. S. 34092) -1- City Clerk - Duties Required by Law (Continued) 14. Duties concerning Improvement District (or Assessment District) proceedings. (Str. & H. C. S 81000 et seq. and Various) 15. File official bonds. (Gov. C. 5 36520) 16. Duties concerning street vacations. (Various State Codes) 17. Duties concerning filing of claims. (Various State Codes) 18. Give notice of public hearings. (Various State Codes) 19. Duties concerning Fair Political Practices Act (Gov. C. 5 81000 et seq. (especially duties as Filing Officer). 20. Publications; copies for state library and university; preservation. (Gov. C. S 50110) 21. Open lists of local appointive offices. (Gov. C. 5 54970) 22. Codes adopted by reference; maintenance in city clerk's office. (Gov. C. 5 50022.6) CITY CLERK - DUTIES REQUIRED BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: Ordinance No. N. S. 154, as amended (Zoning Ordinance): File and process appeals from action of Planning Commission. Resolution -No. N. S. 2146, adopted April 1, 1958 (based upon Gov. C. S 27281): Authorizing City Clerk to accept and consent to deeds for public purposes. Resolution No. N. S. 3227, adopted July 3, 1973 (last annual Salary Resolution): "Non -Statutory Duties - City -Public In ormation; Law Clerk -Legal Secretary." City Code, Section 2-3. Bonds of city clerk and city treasurer. Pursuant to S 36518 of the state Government Code, the bonds of the city clerk and the city treasurer are hereby fixed at the following amounts: City treasurer - $50,000.00 City clerk - 2,000.00 (Ord. No. N. S. 365) City Code, Section 2-16. Cooperation of other city officers with city manager. It shall be the duty of all subordinate officers and the city clerk, city treasurer and city attorney to assist the city manager in administering the affairs of the city efficiently, economically and harmoniously so far as may be consistent with their duties as prescribed by law and ordinances of the city. (Ord. No. N. S. 153 - People's Ordinance creating office of City Manager.) bf 11/22/78 -2- GENERAL UNION BARGAINING UNIT EFFECTIVE SEPT. 1, 1989 THRU AUG. 31, 1990 A B C D E BUILDING INSPECTOR 7T12 2533 2659 2792 2932 BUSINESS LICENSE INSPECTOR 2319 2435 2557 2685 2819 ENGINEERING TECH. 2319 2435 2557 2685 2819 ASSISTANT PLANNER •2188 2298 2413 2533 2660 ACCOUNTANT .2077 2181 2290 2405 2525 RECREATION SPECIALIST 1987 2086 2190 2300 2415 PLANNING AIDE 1987 2086 2190 2300 2415 POLICE SERVICE OFFICER 1981 2080 2184 2293 2408 PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHER 1981 2080 2184 2293 2408 COURT LIAISON OFFICER 1981 2080 2184 2293 2408 PROPERTY/EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN 1981 2080 2184 2293 2408 SECRETARY ,1941 2038 2140 2247 2359 SENIOR ACCOUNT CLERK 1941 2038 2140 2247 2359 EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 1761 1849 1941 2038 2140 EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 1761 1849 1941 2038 2140 SWEEPER OPERATOR 1761 1849 1941 2038 2140 MAINTENANCE II 1761 1849 1941 2038 2140 GENERAL SERVICES OFFICER 1761 1849 1941 2038 2140 TECHNICAL AIDE 1761 1849 1941 2038 2140 PARKING METER MAINTENANCE TECH 1761 1849 1941 2038 2140 POLICE RECORDS CLERK. 1659 1742 1829 1920 2016 ACCOUNT CLERK 1659 1742 1829 1920 2016 CLERK TYPIST 1580 1659 1742 1830 1921 MAINTENANCE I 1580 1659 1742 1830 1921 PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 1580 1659 1742 1830 1921 CUSTODIAN 1444 1516 1592 1671 1755 SUPERVISORY BARGAINING UNIT EFFECTIVE SEPT. 1, 1989 THRU AUG. 31 1990 PUBLIC WORKS CREWLEADER SENIOR EQUIPMENT MECHANIC PARKING METER SPECIALIST GENERAL SERVICES FIELD SUPERVISOR A B C D E 7fTb 2327 2444 2566 TOT 2216 2327 2444 2566 2694 2146 2254 2366 2485 2609 2146 2254 2366 2485 2609 ADMINISTRATION BARGAINING UNIT EFFECTIVE SEPT.' 1, 1989 THRU AUG. 31, 1990 A B C D E DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER 3273 37+36 3608 3789 397 FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR 2662 2795 2935 3082 3236 COMPUTER SYSTEMS MANAGER 2635 2767 2905 3050 3203 POLICE REC. ADMIN/SYSTEM MANAGER 2635 2767 2905 3050 3203 ASSISTANT ENGINEER 2635 2767 2905 3050 3203 SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR 2628 2759 2897 3042 3194 PLANNING ASSOCIATE 2517 2642 2775 2913 3059 COMMUNITY RESOURCES COORD. 2483 2607 2737 2874 3018 PUBLIC WORKS & PARKS SUPERINTENDENT 2479 2603 2733 2870 3013 GENERAL SERVICES COORDINATOR 2395 2515 2640 2772 2911 SECRETARY TO THE CITY MANAGER 2165 2274 2387 2507 2632 CITATION RECORDS ADMINISTRATOR _ 2101 2206 2317 2432 2554 SECRETARY TO DEPT. DIRECTOR 2048 2150 2258 2370 2489 ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE 2048 2150 2258 2370 2489 CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK 2048 •2150 2258 2370 2489 ALL STEP INCREASE CONSIDERATIONS ONE YEAR APART FOR ABOVE GROUPS. bargains REVISED 8/16/89 - DISCARD PREVIOUS SCHEDULES THOMAS W STOEVER WILLIAM B, eARR CHARLES S. VOSE CONNIE COOKE SANOIFER ROGER W SPRINGER COWARD W LEE MCRIBERTO r. OIAZ JAMES DUFF MURPHY JANICE R. MIYAHIRA To _From Date Re • • LAW OFFICES OCT 161989 ; OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE / A PRO'CSSIONAL CORPORATION 1000 SUNSET BOULEVARO LOS ANGELES. CALIFbRNIA 90012 12131 250-3043 MEMORANDUM Kevin Northcraft, City Manager Charles S. Vose, City Attorney October 12, 1989 City Clerk Vacancy TELECOPIE► 12131 462-5336 CONFIDENTIAL Since the current City Clerk is running for election as a City Councilmember for the City of Hermosa Beach, a question has been raised as to the manner in which a vacancy, should the existing City Clerk be elected to the City Council, would be filled. It is clear that the City Clerk is one of the positions in which the governmental powers of the City are vested (Government Code Section 36501). The appointment of a City Clerk occurs in the same manner as City Councilmembers, which includes being elected at a general municipal election. (Government Code Section 36503). If a vacancy occurs with the City Clerk's position prior to the current term of office ending, the Council shall fill the vacancy in accordance with Government Code Section 36512 which states, in pertinent part, as follows: "If the vacancy is in an elected office, the Council shall, within thirty (30) days from the commencement of the vacancy, either fill the vacancy by appointment or call a special election to fill the vacancy. Such a special election shall be held on the next regularly established election date not less than ninety (90) days from the call of the special election. A person appointed or elected to fill a vacancy holds office for the unexpired term of the former incumbent." (Emphasis added) 11 OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE Memo to Kevin Northcraft October 12, 1989 Page 2. Therefore, should the City Clerk be elected to the City Council, the City Council must fill the vacancy by appointment or call a special election within thirty (30) days of the vacancy. The precise date of the vacancy will be the date that the City Clerk officially takes office as a council - member. The appointed or elected City Clerk will then hold office for the unexpired term. Should you have any further questions concerning the procedures to be followed in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact me. CSV:ilf 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DATE: November 8, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft !�� RE: Salary of City Clerk Recommendation: That the City Council amend section 2 of the resolution setting the City Clerk's salary, as follows: "Section 2. Effective November 28, 1989, the City Clerk shall receive a salary equal to 50% of the top step of the Deputy City Clerk classification salary range, payable semi-monthly at the same time and in the same manner as the salaries paid to each of the officers and employees of the City." Analysis: Setting a flat rate for elected officials' salaries has proven to be disadvantageous. It tends not to be increased on a regular basis, which creates an inequity. When the inequity is finally resolved, it usually then requires a significant in- crease. For these reasons, the suggestion to tie the salary to the salary range of a classification that receives annual adjust- ments seems to remedy these problems, and the rate that results seems appropriate given the duties of the position. There currently exists an opportunity to adjust this rate effec- tive with a vacancy in the position. By acting before names of possible appointees or candidates are discussed, the salary con- sideration can be considered separately from the selection or election process, and the personalities of those that will be considered. It may also help attract qualified candidates,/ SUN': '_...E"'" � SAIT AL 1NFGRj iJiv 10 CITY Manhattan Beach Hawthorne El Segundo Lawndale Bell Placentia San Gabriel Tustin Coronado La Verne Montclair Seal Beach CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY CLERK SURVEY Salary $ 200.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 900.00 $ 752.00 $ 150.00 $ 702.00 $ 200.00 $ 300.00 $ 3650.00 $ 4333.00 $ 4202.00 1 Elected Part Time Elected Part Time Elected Part Time Elected Part Time Elected Part Time Elected Part Time Elected Part Time Elected Part Time Elected Part Time Appointed Appointed Elected Full Full Full Time Time Time SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION J'• a FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:40:20 Lill, OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/14/89 PAGE DATE 0001 11/08/89 s • 4 e PAY VENDOR NAME VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 CHK * e DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP e to H C. N. 0. A. 03150 001-400-2101-4316 00479 $120.00' TR273 00273 31649 11 u CONF- REG7,I. WRTGHI Ilid/J 1U/db/6Y PULICE / IHA1NING *0.00 11/07/89 +3 4 *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************a***stat•**************************+t�t�tuat+tia�t $120.00 Is +e H STATE OF*CALIFORNIA 03065 001-400-2101-5403 00009 $6,000.00 10149 31647 AUTO PURCHASt/ruLI(.t 1u/d5/GY PULLUL /VtHLCLtb $0.00 11/07/89 H STATE OF*CALIFORNIA 03065 170-400-2103-5403 00001 $5,200.00 10149 31647 AUTO PURCHASE/POLICE lU/20/b'v brt(. 1NVtblUINS /Vt1-116Lt5 *0.00 11/07/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $11,200.00 H LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 00317 001-400-4101-4316 00159 $75.00 08654 31645 StA REG/SCHVBACH 1u/413/tlY PLANNING 1IMAININ(i $0.00 11/07/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $75.00 H THE*MARUKO HOTEL 03142 001-400-2101-4317 00135 $89.46 TR274 00274 31652 hOf 1EwbKI rn2/4 1UIJU/t3Y PUL1(.E /(.UNFtKtNGt tXPENbE $0.00 11/07/:- 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $89.46 • H KIM*MITCHELL 00522 001-400-2701-4316 00018 $222.00 TR276 00276 31655 PEtc DTtM/MITCHELL/SCOII TRd76 11/06/tri V1V11.. UtFtNbt /1HAINING $0.00 11/07/89 H KIM*MITCHELL 00522 001-400-2701-4316 00019 $424.00 TR276 00276 31655 HOTELIMTTC■ - •- =- LViL VhJ- Nbt. /IHAININU $0.00 11/07/89 ■ e• *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $646.00 e' 67 se H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00334 $85,426.48 31646 eo ETIREMENT7SEN1 by 1U/24fIlY H1s11HtMtNI /HtuIHEM.NI $0.00 11/07/89 e1 ez H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00335 $67,022.99CR 31646 e4 RETIREMENT/StPT 89 lu/G4/1SY HEIIKtMtNI /Hb1IHEMtNT *0.00 11/07/89 .e5 ee H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00336 $16,237.83CR 31646 HETIREMENT1SEPT-"89 10/24/89 Ht;1HtMtNI /KtI1HEMtNI $0.00 11/07/89 so 0 . 7/ 3 73 7e illal 9 J J 9 J J 4 • G11Y 01- H*KMUSA UtACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0002 TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 1� 2 3 �J 4 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO # CHK # . AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. -'---RETIREMENT/SEPT-89 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. KETIREMENT7SP 1 aY H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00337 #9.693.65 ' 10724789 RETIREMENT /KEIIKEMEN1 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00108 10124/w1 $819.25 S1KEt1 L1VH1.NO /KLI1KtM8NF 00026 110-400-3301-4180 00109 $194.83 31646 *0700""-11707/89 31646 $ • 7 • • io *1 12 S0.00 11/07/89 RETIREMENT7SEPT-BY H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. --RETIREMENT7SE1.1 89 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/SEPT-8Y 10/d4IbY VLH IK0 0181 /HEIlKLMtNI 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00108 75.520.76 10/d4/a9 PAKKINW WNW /KLILHI1 NI 00026. 145-400-3401-4180 00082 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. $201.01 S0.00 70. 00 1.0724781 DIAL A RIUE /RE FIREMEN l 00026 145-400-3402-4180 00082 $73.55 *0. 00 ETTREMENI/btP1 8Y H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/SEPT-81 • PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 1U1s'4/tlY tbtA 00026 145-400-3403-4180 00031 10724761 /KtUIKEMENf $17.99 S0.00 008 1A5S Su1ibUY /Ktt.HLMENI 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00080 $127.77 ETIktrltNIIStr1 aY H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/SEPT-BY H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 1U/d4/8Y W1U88IN0 OUAI(D /KEr1KtMENr 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00107 IU/4/aY $998.38 bEWEH/bi DRAIN /HI1KLMLNf 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00031 *213. 09 RETIRLMLNT/StPT aY H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. HETIREMENT7bt'T WY 1U/d4/UY L1ATSILIIY 1N8 /11LT18EMLNr 00026 705-400-1217-4180 00031 IU/4/1:1Y $276.49 WUHKEKS LUMP /KEI1REMENI *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.302.43 70.00 31646 11/07/89 31646 11/07/89 31646 1170778Y 31646 11/07/89 u .4 11 16 .7 u 10 20 21 22 22 24 26 26 27 26 31646 11/07789 31646 70.00 11/07/89 S0. 00 $0.00 *0. 00 31646 11/07789 20 20 2. 22 23 34 26 36 37 30 30 40 42 43 44 31646 11/07/89 31646 11/07/89 4C 40 47 46 av 60 6. 52 62 54 55 66 H SAN BERNARDINO POLICE DEPT. TUITIDN787-WISNILWSKI-TRd/4 01804 001-400-2101-4317 00136 750.00 10730789 POLICE /CONFERERCE-EXPENSL *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 1150. 00 TR274 00274 31653 70.00 11/07/89 67 55 50 60 •/ 62 63 64 H SPIRIT OF LOS ANGELES 03119 . 001-400-4601-4201 00440 7200.60 09072 31650 Ai33)L UUSI/SENJUK IK1P IU/LW/UV CUMM HLSUUHCLS /CUNIHACI 8ERV10E/PRIVAT 70.00 11/07/89 66 66 67 6• 60 70 7. 72 Z ..r •J 73 74 76 7t 11. • • 3 5 CIIY OF HERMOSA BEAU1t\ FINANCE-SFA340DEMAND LIST TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 PAGE DATE 0003 11/08/89 x 3 < PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN it AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK B DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 1 e s 7 *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************************t**************** $200.60 9 10 tt 12 I^ 19 11 1< 12 H STEVE*WISNIEWSKI 01364 001-400-2101-4317 00134 477.25 00274 31651 tle o PER-DIEM-ADVANCE—Iv/ .30 / UV YULIGE /CUNFEHENCE EXPENSE $0.00 11/07/89 17 14 1e 15 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $7725 . 10 20 1 21 17 x2 •0 H MARK *WRIGHT 00133 001-400-2101-4316 00477 4102.75 TR273 00273 31648 23 24 19 PER DIEM AUVANCE 911d/3 1U7d6/7115Y YOL1LE /TRAINING *0.00 11/07/89 25 ,• xe H MARK *WRIGHT 00133 001-400-2101-4316 00478 $212.00 TR273 00273 31648 27 HOTEL-ADV7M. WR1GH1 IRd/3 1U/d6/UY I'UL1c.E /IRALNINL $0.00 11/07784—N • 30 .4 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $314,75 31 u as 34 _ *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $33.075.49 35 3e '1 37 38 t, R A-1 COAST RENTALS 00029 001-400-6101-4309 00775 $39.38 00101 31659 39 40 M1'SC-CMG570CT"89 10/31/t3Y YAHKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 11/07/89 41 42 la R A-1 COAST RENTALS 00029 001-400-8614-4201 00055 $22839 . 00101 31659 43 4/ . MISC-CHCS/OC1 99 10/J1/8Y Cie 8U-614 /CUNIHACI bERV10E/YRIVAT *0.00 11/07/89 45 t 46 36 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $267.77 <e 17 49 10 50 R ADAMSON UNIFORM EQUIP. CORP. 00138 001-400-2101-4309 00240 $195.87 00102 31660 51 52 In MISC CHGS/OC -89 10/31/139 VULILE /MAUNnENANCE MAI-SW/ALS $0.00 11/07/89 ea ,1 54 12*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $195.87 ee .a 57 44 55 45 R ADVANCE ELEVATOR 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00342 880.00 22358 00003 31661 59 o0 .., ELEV-MAINT7NOV-89 99J513 11/01,u9 dCD0 1 ALNi /CUNIRACI SERVILE/FIR/VAT *0.00 11/07/89 61 e2 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $80.00 e3 e/ en e5 5 • ee 71 R AMERICAN SOC. OF CIVIL ENGRS 01956 001-400-4202-4315 00046 8200.00 00775096 10049 31662 ea ,7 DUES>B—GENGtER 75098------T0725/89 euu WKS A13M1N /MEMuERSHIF *U.00 11/08/U9 69 sa 70 71 5 72 55 73 50 74 75' 7 79' J tle 0 0 0 94/ 1 • It • 1 3 • • • t1 37 14 1' 1.. .11 4 43 44 4z 4 G1IY OF H NMUUA UtAGF1 1" FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0004 2 TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 34 5 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 6 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 7 a w R AMERICAN SOC. OF CIVIL ENGRS 01956 001-400-4202-4315 00048 8187.00 00757493 10033 31662 11 1z .—"—M"'-- MEMBERSHIP DUES/ANTICH-57493—i072078V PUB-WKSADMIN-7MEMBERSHIP $187:00-11708/89 ,3 14 1 *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************>**************************u********************** $387.00 IB6 17 1e R ASPA INSURANCE PLANS 02218 001-400-1212-4188 01551 4115.00 07505-0500464 09743 31663 19 20 I.TT7-INS7K-NORTHCRRi•T 00464 10/20/69 trw' UENtF1Ib /hMFLUYtb UENLF1Ib $I17UU 11/18/89 21 22 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********.*********************************************************** $115.00 a 25 26 R ASS. OF MUNI DATA PROC DIR. 01291 001-400-1206-4315 00040 4120.00 09515 31664 27 26 DUES/M. STURGES 10720789 UAIA PROCESSING /MhMBERSR1P 80.00---11-70878S, 20 w *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 5120.00 32 33 R DELL & HOWELL 00563 001-400-4201-4305 00492 4138.75 871600 07588 31665 35 MICROFItM SUPPLIES 71600------I07/1/8v HUTLu1NG /UFF1c.e th'j( SUPPLi 310-0oii/08789�67 35 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4138.75 ,o 41 42 R ROBERT*BENZ 03136 001-210-0000-2110 03359 8100.00 86813 09866 31666 43 44 DAMAGE-DEPOSIT-REFUNu ubtif3—TI7027k1'i /UtPUSI 1 S/WLJRK U iRANTEE $0740 11/08789-----. 47 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100.00 46 49 SO R BETA GROUP 00437 001-400-1206-4317 00052 435.00 TR272 00272 31667 91 57 bEM REG7M-STUR6kk I H7 D • • s o l - ' • ERSE $000 11 /09789 54 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 435.00 M 87 50 R BLICKMAN. INC. 03092 001-400-4601-4201 00441 863.00 09069 31668 60 THEATRE—TECR7I0=23—t39 11072 MFf RESOOR RVICE/PRIVAT 40.00 11/011789 61 62 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 463.00 ea 6656 R BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 00163 001-400-2101-4306 00708 6141.69 00098 31669 66 MISC—CHOS/`JF:P tiY 09/3U/89 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 40.00 11/07/89 60 . 70 7' 72 73 74 . 75 74 3 FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA REACH DEMAND LIST TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 1\ 2 4 M PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 4i7 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • 7 s • /0 „ *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************•a***********a•nu• *************n•1►****•a**+r 11 $141.69 12 13 I1 14 R GAIL*BROWN-KOEBSELL 01004 001-400-2101-4312 01080 $393.75 09669 31670 ;e 1/ EXPENbtS/KEuuRub C.LAbb 1-1/UTTUY PULLi:E /TRAVEL tXFENSE , POST $0.00 11/07/89 17 4 IS m *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $393.75 �o 21 ° 22 •1 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016'• 001-300-0000-3904 00296 $17.00 09875 31672 PETTf CASH REIMB/D 24 24 . CT 8Y 1f/veTE9 /OtNtRAL MISC tLZA19E0US S0.00 11/08/89 25 • u R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1202-4305 00259 $6.00 09075 31672 27 ETTY-CASH REIMB/OCT 8Y 11/ue/bY r1NANLt AUMIN /UFrit. WW1 byre $(370o---mover----1 ,1 30 '4 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1203-4316 00166 31' $14.00 09875 31672 32 r, ; Pt(Tf CAbi Ktlrw,uI.., iiv 11/Ud/iiY PtNbUNNtL /IKAININU $0.00 11/08/89 33 34 H; R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2101-4305 01122 *48.39 09875 31672 3s PETTY'-CASH-REIMII/OCT-89 IT70e/8Y NUL1t.E /Urrll.h UPER-SUPPL1 .b $0.00 11/08789 3� 38 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2101-4309 00242 $4.79 09875 31672 3.1 PETTY-CASHRElnuf T 89 11/0 UL1(.t /MAINTENANCE MAIENIALS $0.00 11/08/89 44' 42 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2101-4316 00480 $28.50 09875 31672 -CASH 43 ;, PETTY REIMBFOC -- 4 = •OCICE /IKAININO $0700 11/08789 43 • 48 n R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2401-4309 00126 $5.95 09875 31672 PETTY 07` 37 CASK REInB/OGT 89 11/0e/t!, ANIMAL CONTROL /11A119TENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 17/08/89 ea 77 50 •1 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4101-4305 00353 $9.68 09875 31672 81 52 .,, ETTY'CASH"REI1"IIITOCT'8Y 11/O/t3Y PLANNING /urriCt UI'hK SUPPLIES *0. 00 11/08789 �3 54 ,2 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4101-4316 00160 $15.00 09875 31672 ss. ,3 PETTY GASH REIMII/OCT 8Y 11/ve/tiY PLANNING /lRA1N1NO $0.00 11/08/89 57 44 50 43 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4201-4201- 00210 $23.50 09875 31672 0o • /o PETTY-CASH-REIMB'TOCT-BY I1/U2/MY HUIEDTNG /CUNIRALL b6NVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/08/89 41 47 •2 4s R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4201-4305 00493 $0.99 09875 31672 e4� 40 rtrn' %.AbI1 Kt/MU/MT UY 11/velEY I:WILD1NG ICH -PI -Ca OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 11/08789 GO 70 56 91 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4205-4309 00410 $20.00 09875 31672 48 ,. TETTY-CASH-REIMTI/u - e c. • 5 . , .. . - - -. •, 4 • 78/89 49 53 70 !4 71• 72 3• 73 56 74 A7 75.27 J >i r • - • • 2 C1 1 Y OF MMUKMUSA UEALM FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0006 TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 ,\ 2 a a PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # • AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 6 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP a 6 7 6 .0 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4601-4305 00754 $6.92 09875 31672 12 —PETTY CASH-REIMB70CT84, 1170278,f CUMM-RESOURCES /Uhl- ICE UPER-SUPPEIL $(5700-11708/89 2 4 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4601-4308 00217 $127.34 09875 31672 '6 .6 - _ - - c ■ c 4 :- ■ ■ ■ _ ■ r - = 0.00 11/08/69 ,a ,< 16 ., R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4601-4316 00120 $7.50 09875 31672 16 20 +a PETTYCCASH-Rtlw►B/UGI 8Y 11/Ud/tlY CUMM KE:iUUKI:E:i' / IKAINING SSU. UU 11/U /89 21 17 22 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 - 110-400-3302-4309 00609 $5.27 09875 31672 2: 24 PE c ■ =" 1/Od/Idy PAKKIN6 UM1- /MAINFENANCE MAIERIALS $0.00 11/08/89 25 • 26 +, R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 110-400-3302-4316 00158 $13.76 09875 31672 27 :, ETTT'CASR REIMu/OCT-8Y 11/02/I:IY PAKKING"EN1 /IKALNLNG $6700 11/08789----1 2 20 :. 41** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $354.59 .z 33 34 -, R BUCKALTER, NEMER. FIELDS & 03151 001-400-1131-4201 00526 $3,867.02 520015 09128 31673 , ITLE SEARCR7RROW7SEF-89-20U1D T073070y CITY AIIUNNEY /CUNIKACI StNVTCE7PlWIVAT *0.00 11708/89 36 -, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3.867.02 3d 4 42 ,; R LINDA*BUFFETT 03138 001-210-0000-2110 03361 $100.00 85358 09865 31674 43 44 34 DAMAGE-DEPOSITRhkUND 15358 11/Ud/tlY /ULF'USI IS7IJDRK GUA 40.0i1708789-45 � 46 6 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100. 00 46 7 4W 10 60 ao R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. 00599 001-400-3101-4201 00024 $3.150.00 . 00061 31675 51 57 40 r'ARKS-MAINT7SEPT-89 x9730789 MIU1AN5 /CUNIKACI SEIlVICE/PRIVAT 4D-700 11707/89 63 41 64 42 R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. INC. 00599 001-400-6101-4201 00152 $10.025.62 00061 31675 56 43 rAKKb MAINI/bbrI tlY UY/3U/tlY PARKS /CUN1RACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/07/89 57 44 56 44*** VENDOR TOTAL*•******************************************************************* $13,175.62 0 46 a. a 62 46 R CAL POLY KELLOGG UNIT FOUND. d0073 001-400-2101-4313 00221 $559.60 10153 31676 a, 46 IUII/HURLS/KELLY/KEAKIN 1U/S/1:1Y POLI 5E. SIL $0.00 11/08/89 65 W 66 6, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $559.60 66 52 0 33 7 J 772 64 R CALIFORNIA JOB JOURNAL 03143 001-400-1203-4201 00595 $36.00 19981 09745 31677 55 EMr ADS/ASSI ENG r4EEK i`>W1 IU/10/tlY PEKSUNNEL /CUNIKACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/09/89 73 M • 4 76 �7 9. • 3 1e 11 ,2 ,3 44 43 1. ;art ;t► y.� JJ J J 1 1r J J FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA c • DEMAND LIST ' PAGE 0007 1 2 TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 4 PAY VENDOR NAME VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO 8 CHK * ° DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP e Y 10 R CALIFORNIA JOB JOURNAL EMP ADS/ASST-ENGINEER---1978r-------10708713,---- 03143 001-400-1203-4201 00596 872.00 19781 09747 31677 ' PERSONNEL /CONTRACT-SERVICE7PR1VAI 80.00 11708789 ,3 14 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $108.00 16 1 n 1 ,e R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 1U/J1/89 001-400-3101-4303 00062 MtDIANS 8552.99 /Uf1L1JItS 00109 31678 *0.00 11707 a 1° 20 21 1WATER-B1LLINGS/UGI 8Y 22 1 R CALIFORNIA WATER.,SERVICE 00016• 001-400-4204-4309 01463 8384.60 00109 31678 23 WATER-BTELINC�/U1.1 UY IU/al/UY BLDG MAINE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $•. • • • 24 23 24 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00275 83,379.58 00109 31678 Z7. WATER-BILLINGS7UCT-8Y 10731/09 NARKS /UTILITIES $0.00-31707%99— *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $4,317.17 31! 32 33 34 R CCAN INNOVATION GROUP —SEM-REG/M:-STURGES —'823 03144 001-400-1101-4317 00352 875.00 823 09513 31679 10720/89 LITY-COUNCIL /CUNIEREF10E-EXPENSE $0.00 11/0879' 1 3 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $75.00 41 42 R CELLULAR DYNAMICS COMPANY -PHONE "'CHCS/SEP-89 02449 001-400-2101-4304 00450 8662.00 00910 31680 4443 45 MOBILE U9727789 POLICE / I ELLPHUNE $0.00 1/707799 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $662.00 ae 4 S. R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT 00389 001-400-1202-4305 00258 89.59 01011 31681 e/ e2 MISC"CHGS7OCT-8- • - •MIN /UrF1(E1J H SUPPLIES 80.00 11/0778' 53 34 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT 00389 001-400-2101-4201 00473 8170.00 1376 09256 31681 ,a so R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT 00389 001-400-2101-4305 01121 $33.32 01011 31681 . w, ISC-CHGS7OCT"'8Y I0731/lig NOLICE /1_11 -1 -ILL UPER-S0PNLIE3 $0.00 11707789 tl1 e2 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT 00389 001-400-4101-4305 00352 812.25 01011 31681 ea, 1 rlib(. l.M�sb/UGI 6Y IU/J1/69 PLANNING /OFFICE -OPER SUPPLIES 80.00 11/07/89 43 se R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT 00389 110-400-3302-4201 00230 e7 8175.00 ■. ., ._ �. - 1169 09937 31681 ' .00 11/0= = ee 40 OVERHAUL-TYPEWHITtK 116Y UH/Jl/UY 1'AH' `t • 7o n 72 23 • 71 7a 7 JJ J J 1 1r J J 44 06 12 4] t4 15 17 48 46 57 5, 5 5 5 5 5 CUP( OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0008 TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 1N 2 4 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 8 6 e R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT 00389 110-400-3302-4305 00619 313.26 01011 31681 . t6 11 12 MSC-CHCS/OCT 8Y 107317SY PARKING-ENF /UFFtCPERSUPPLIES$0.00-11707/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL +tit*************tit**********************************a**************** $413. 42 13 14 1e R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-2101-4311 00753 8393.80 01012 31682 17 16 1. PIIS 9 1U/31/d9 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 30730 11/0771714-----2 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 3393.80 22 22 2, R CHEVRON USA. INC. 00634 001-400-2101-4310 00209 3265.65 141-728-441-9 01065 31683 —I072d/d9 25 26 27 MISC-CHGS7SEP=OC1 WY 441-YVOCIOE /MOTOR FUELS -AND -LUBES $0.00-11707/89-2: *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 3265.65 31 R COALE CONSTRUCTION 01479 001-210-0000-2110 03349 31,575.00 82557 09869 31684 3 35 ]6 —WORK -GUAR REFUND 82557—II70e/H'i /ULPUSITS7WORR GUARANTEE $0730-31708/89 R COALE CONSTRUCTION 01479 001-210-0000-2110 03358 3375.00 82557 09870 31684 27 3.3 4q WORK QUA( REFUND 13655/ 11/02/bY /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 11/08/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 31,950.00 41 42 44 R COAST IRRIGATION CO. 00354 125-400-8508-4309 00011 31,236.55 A29206/A29537 09487. 31685 45 46 17 .6 7�- - - . _ . - . 0. _ - _ — 4: _ , ... - , •13/89 R COAST IRRIGATION CO. 00354 125-400-8508-4309 00012 3880.22 '1519 10026 31685 A -9550: 4/r W 51 32 bPRINKLER-PRRIb :51519 1o/25/S9 CTP . ` , ` - • • - :80.23 11/08/89 e] 54 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 82,116.77 56 57 50 R COLUMBIA PICTURES TELEVISION 03137 001-210-0000-2110 03360 3500.00 86859 09867 31686 500 AMAGE-DEPOSIT-REFOND—S685q 13702759 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.60 11/08-/S9-----61 62 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 3500.00 64 65 66 R COPY SUPPORT 01729 001-400-1122-4201 00190 360.49 1022 09319 31687 678 CANDIDA0/10/89 ELECTIONS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 860.49 11/08/89 GO 7., 71 72 73 74 75 LP 2 4 17 44 e 4 r, z 4 t.l TY OF HERMObA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0009 TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 1\ 2 4 PAY a • VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION • DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP a 6 • 1 R COPY SUPPORT 01729 001-400-1131-4201 00525 $160.0 1022 09319 31687 CODE SUPPLEMEN 10 11 12 I b I U22 1U/1078 C i l Y A l I URRIEY---7OOATRACTSERVICF/PRl VAT 4T6070r---11708799 13 14 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************** tint****at�wtatat�atatat*+t*******itat***a *** $220. 50 /O 4 16 17 1e s R CORONET/MTI FILM & VIDEO, INC. 03091 001-400-2101-4305 01123 $303.70 273704 10105 31688 1 200 *** VENDOR 22 o TOTAL**********+t********************************************************* $303.70 z4 t. 25 . R DATA SAFE 00156 001-400-1206-4201 00641 $115.00 45133 00047 31689 27 I APE`STORAGE7Ut. I id-NUVIT 451.13 1U/1/1:1Y UATR-PROCESSING /CUN I RAL t bERVICE7PRI9AT— $0700-11707/89-----:: '*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $115.0031 30 32 33 34 . R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 00269 001-400-2101-4201 00474 $832.20 246839190 00006 31690 COMP MAINT/OCT-89 —'-- 39190— 33' 37 10T1378Y NOCICk /cUN I KAi.TSERVTCE7FRIVA I 40.00---r1707789 38 R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 00269 001-400-2201-4201 00102 $554.80 246839190 00006 31690 39 OMP'TIa1N1/UCT'Sb JYlYV 1V/I4/ti9 FIRE 71,ONTRACT SERVIGETPRIVAT *0.00 11/07/89 ±.2 41 42 , *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,387.00 O3' 44 43 46 1 R EASTMAN, INC. 02514 001-400-1208-4305 ' 00680 $886.47 01068 31691 47• 1 V/.il/tlY GEN APPKOP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 13/07/89 4; *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $886.47 so 5i a3 54 R EASY READER 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00075 $1,331.78 0268 01067 31692 as 3 • 57 —■ • ' ' • = JY t.LEKR /PUBLIC NU I ICING $0.00 11/07/89 58 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 59 . $1,331.78 00 61 62 1 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4205-5401 00007 $814.73 80029 10022 31693 e..1 AIK tiUb. KEELS UOU29 1V/23/69 EQUIP SERVICE /EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $50 $814.73 11/08/89 65 66 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $814.73 67 66 6• 70 R CITY OF*EL SEGUNDO 02783 • 170-400-2103-4201 00041 $274.77 10150 31694 772' ‘AK KENIAL/1V-.! IU IV -1/ 1U/24/tlY SPEC INVESIGIN'S /CUNIRACI bERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/08/89 73 • 74 75 1 4 5 a is J iiA ULAGH FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 PAGE DATE 0010 11/08/89 1N x PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 6 6 w arta VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************************a************** .: $274.77 12 u 14 R ELEK—TEK, INCORPORATED 02338 001-400-1206-4305 00409 $517.20 453659 09512 31695 16 13. 00 11 /08!89 16 17 - - 6 _ 1 LAS . 6 ` 6 6 ■ _ r_ • ' _ 16 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $517.20 20 21 22 R STEVE*ENDOM y 01034 •• 001-400-2101-4312 01088 $72.80 10152 31696 ;: 11LE57AD U/d5/69 POL10E /TRAVhL LXPLNSL . POS$ $0.00 11/08/89 23 26 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************•x•*****a*****a****** $72.80 26 20 w R CYNTHIA*ERDELYI 03101 001-210-0000-2110 03354 $50.00 87838 09876 31697 al ax ANIM /636 11/02/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 11/08/89 as 34 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50. 00 36 a6 a7 30 R EXECUTIVE—SUITE SERVICES INC. 01294 001-400-4204-4201 00341 $1,325.00 041/035 00062 31698 40 tKV/S'hP 89 1/UJ 09/30/69 BLDG MAINE /CONIRACT ShRVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/07/89 41 42 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1. 325. 00 44 46 46 R FLIGHT SUITS, LTD 03093 • 001-400-2101-4187 00287 $796.81 24519 10125 31699 47 ,6 6 6 6 6. C • I I, 6•-• 6 11 .. - -6. 1 11/0 8/89 4s 60 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $796.81 52 Oa 64 ZS R FRANKSONS, INC. 00010 110-400-3302-4311 00536 $17.99 16138 09918 31700 60 CUSRMAN PARIS 16138 ARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $11.02 11/08/89 77 66 R FRANKSONS. INC. 00010 110-400-3302-4311 00537 $52.15 16256/16136 09920 31700 40 USHMAN—PARTS 16136 16727/89 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $42.71 11/08/89 61 62 a*a VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $70.14 44 6a 66 R JANET*FURNEE' 02610 001-400-4601-4201 00442 $100.00 09068 31701 ae THEATREZECH/10-17-10-22 10/23/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/08/89 60 70 71 72 73 74 75 7, • 3 TIME CITY—Oh HERMObA BEAt.H FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 PAGE DATE 0011 11/08/89 z ; 6 06 e PAY VENDOR NAME VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PO $ CHK $ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 6 7 *** VENDOR TOTAL*****•*************************************************************** $100.00 e 10 tt 12 13 1t R GATES MC DONALD 02538 705-400-1217-4201 00058 $2,485.00 02-23285 00044 —SIA DMr — 31702 14 10 16 WUHISE Limp ILUNTRAL 1 bERVTLhTFRLVAT WO. OD 11708/89 m 16 m *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.485.00 1e 70 .6 21 z: m R GERBER AMBULANCE SERVICE 02897 001-400-2101-4201 00478 $274.47 5 EnEK 102343 10146 t3 10.00 31703 11/08/89 34 25 1'. • • -- UL1Lt /LUNIHALI bERVlt.t/PRIVAT ze1. 7, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $274.47 :7.• 70' 70 30 R DEN*GILMORE 02024 001-210-0000-2110 03348 $1,550.00 78547 09868 31704 RR GU14k RtrIIIVU /11,4/ 11/Vd/tiY /DtPOSIlS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 11/08/89 32 33 34 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 35 $1,550.00 3e 37 36 R GRANT THORNTON 00742 001-400-1202-4201 00184 $2,910.00 09255 31705 70 beEL At.C.IG btKV/LUPb 11/Ud.'bV I-INANL.t ADMIN /CONTRACT ShRVICL/PRIVAT $0.00 11/08/89 41 42 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 82.910.00 e3 44 es 46 13 R GROSVENOR INN 03132 001-400-2101-4312 01083 $423.36 47� 10155 $0.00 31706 11/08/89 46 49 t7 wir1GH'f �74Q-/g! POLI(,t /TRAVEL tRPEI`Jst . POET 30 ,� *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $423.36 61 ,u sz 63 Al s4 42 R GROUP 1 CONSTRUCTION 03135 001-210-0000-2110 03356 8325.00 Wuti GUAR 78555 09872 $0.00 31707 11/08/89 55: 37 3 RtruNu /11=D 11/Ud/tiy /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 44 s4 as *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $325.00 6o 34 e1 47 67 46 R GSA SUPPLY 03063 105-400-2601-4309 00541 8121.30 DRILL 74703 10021 31708 67` 64 49 8IT btlS /g/UJ: lV/lY/wY blHttt L1GHIING /MA1NTkNANCE MAIJRIALb $121.31 11/06/89 60 s0 86 3t *** VENDOR TOTAL****a*************************************************************** $121.30 e7 �. en ee 73 70 7. R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00248 $8.12 01025 31711 71V 72 ss 36 . ■ - • 31/89 L1 JY COUNCIL /ThLtFHONt $0.00 11 j07799 73 74 7s `7 79 r✓ 5.0 .J J 0 C-11 Y OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0012 1 TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 2 4 6 6 e PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00239 $30.09 01025 31711 9 10 1/ 12 TELE BILLINGS/OCT 09 10/31789 C11Y-CCERK- /ItLLPRONE $0.00---11/07/69 ' R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00240 $0.54 372-6186 01069 31711 13 14 16 16 17 16 t200 FAX--BILCIt4G70GT 89 -arab 10/31/89 CITY ILK /IELEPHUNE -$0.00 11/07/89 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 . 001-400-1131-4304 00168 $11.40 01025 31711 . ELE-BILCINGS7OCT-'89 10/31 /It' c l l Y A l l thl t $0.-00-1-170778'/ 17 ,� R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 •• 001-400-1141-4304 00252 $33.74 01025 31711 21 22 2: 24 •, ELE BILLINGS1O : 4 .- --■, 0.00 11/0//89 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00253 $0.17 372-6186 01069 31711 25 26 21 au 31 32 33 34 3' 37 33 40 41 42 44 4= 46 4n 10731789 CITY-TREASURER /IELEUNE $0.00-I1707/89-:4 FAX-BILLING70CT 89 -6186--- PH R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00272 $20.21 01025 31711 TELE-BIL1iNGb/OLI aY 10/J1/UV C;1IY MANAGLK FTELEPNUNE S0.00 11/07/89 �,:• R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00273 $0.50 372-6186 01069 31711 --FAX-BILLING/OCT-89"•-• -6186 10731789 CITY -MANAGER /TELEPHONE $0.0011/07/89 I , -- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00272 $77.52 01025 31711 1ELE STULINGS7UL1 UV 10/31/0/ FINANCE ADMIN /[ELEPHUNE *0.00 11/07/89 .; R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00273 $27.23 372-6186 01069 31711 ; " FAX"BILCTNG/OCT-BY -6186 10731789 FINANCE-ADMIN /TELEPRONE $0.00 11/07/89 ^ R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00272 $29.01 01025 31711 .7 ISLE BILLINGS/U(.1 UV 10/31/89 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE $5:00 11/07/89 30 •o R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00273 $8.25 372-6186 01069 31711 4W 50 41 u .,o -FAX BILCING70CT-BY -6Iti6 1U731/UV PERSONNEL /TELEFR0FIE $0.00 11/07/89 .11 :2 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00189 $198.67 01025 31711 93 :4 -o 4, ISLE BILLINGS/UCI 8V 10/31/89 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE $0.00 11/07/89 44 49 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00190 $1.62 372-6186 01069 31711 67 60 00 61 62 63 FAX- BICLING70CTB9 -ales3x731/89 DSATA-PROCESSING /TELEPHONE $0.00 11/07/89 37 00 40 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 015 001-400-1207-4304 00155 $21.19 01025 31711 49 ItLt BILLINGS/001 UV 10/J1/89 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE $0.00 11/07/89 . :7 SI R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1208-4304 00029 $10.57 01025 31711 63 66 69 69 70 7. 72 -2 1 ELE BILLINGS/UC 1 8'/ 10/31789 GEN FFRDF /1 bLEPHONE $0.00 11/07/S9 • 33 34 .S 59 `7 73 74 76 750 J J 1 611 Y OF HERMOSA BIACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0013 "IME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 js a c 7 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN #AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP s o 1• 11 1: R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2101-4304 -. 00448 $958.14 9 10 11 12 ELE-BILtINGS70CT-89 01025 31711 107317B rUL1t.t / ItLEPHUNE $0.�O�i70//ktY R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00207 $234.54 01025 31711 TtLt ii1LL1Nwb/uCT 5 14 1° 16 n 16 19 •4 .s t39- iu731/89" FLHL 11tLtPHUNt S0.00 11/07/89 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00257 $32.78 .6 to fELE-B/LLINGS/u 89 01025 31711 20 iu731/a9 ANIMAL i.UNIRUL / ItLtPHUNt 80.00 I1/0//89 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00274 $57.85 01025 31711 TEC. BILL1Nldb/O1 BY G 1V/J1/tlY PLANNING /ItLtrHUNt zl 22n as z4 zs z6 27 :9 30 51 sz as sr " 30 430 0 e 42 45 as 46 48 06 e9 50 51' . $0.00 11/07/89 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00275 $8.27 372-6186 01069 31711 FAX 8IL"CING/OCT-8, -6186 I0/.i1/8Y 'CANNING /ItLEPHUNt $0.00-1r/0778Y R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00268 $103.48 01025 31711 TECt BILLING u/Ja/tlY In/ILIUM, / ItLtrHUNt 80.00 11/U//89 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00269 $0.27 372-6186 01069 31711 FAX .77 17 -i ., „ ,., BILLING/OCT-89 -6186--10/31/89 UUT D1NG /IEL.IHUr•1t $0.00 11/07/89 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00275 $230.36 01025 31711 ELE-$ItttNGSIOCT-BY iu/31/8Y PUB WKb ADMIN fiLLLPHUNL 80.00 11/0//kjY R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00276 $7.97 372-6186 01069 31711 -'FAX DILLING70CT-89- --b186 -WKS 10731/BY PUB -ADMIN /ILLEPHONL 80.00 11/07789 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4204-4321 00467 $17.09 01025 31711 TELE-B2tC2 '' 11 19 u/31/aY liLl)G MA1NI /DUILDING SA*- TY /SEGVRIf 80.00 11/07/89 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00317 $163.99 01025 31711 ELE-BIttINGS-/OCT-89 1; 3 , 42 53 54 5366 s� 66 7o 10/31/tl' uuIRM-RESOUHctb /ILLVHONt ----$0700--r17757/139 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00318 $0.17 372-6186 01069 31711 FAX B 4) -6r66 1WJ1/89 (.Uru1 RESUOR(.ts /1 LtPHUNE $0.00 11/OT/89 44 as R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00178 $10.15 01025 31711 16 ELE-BILt1NGS/OCT-8Y 10731/by PARKS /ftLEPHONE $0700 11/07/89 1 7 40 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 110-400-3301-4304 00121 $10.00 01025 31711 TELE BILLINGS/ut.T e 62 6'' 49 "' '/66 6: 9 5 5 4 89 10/J1/tlY vtH PKG 1716, /lELtrHONt $0.00 Il/07/89 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00272 *186.08 01025 31711 65 66 67" 70 7, 72 n 74 75 - 7 EtE-BIttTNGSluCT-89 1'0731/89 FARK1 - tNF IThLtrHONI $t).00 11/u//Id9-b9 55 56 101 Ci 1 Y OF HtHI9QSA"QEAti FINANCE–SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0014 1 2 . TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 4 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 6 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP a 0 9 to q R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00273 $7.58 372-6186 01069 11 — 31711 --FAX —'-6286-10/3178'l 12 DILLING70CT`89-- PARKING ENF / I tL ROME— $0.06-- 11/07/89-13 *4 ., R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 145-400-3401-4304 00042 $4.16 16 01025 31711 16 +s fECE–DiLLZNGS/U(..1 uY lU/.dl/8Y DIAL A HiDt /TELEPHUNt $0700 11/07/89 17 •4 16 , *** VENDOR TOTAL *stat•x•x•iaittt**atq••x••u•afar******►itatp•at•x••p•u•*at•*aaat+t*•ttit*Baa••a••It*at•at••n•It•u••It*p*q•u•+tir****•x•*+t•xu•* 162,511.71 so 21 22 � . R GTEL 01340•• 001-400-2201-4304 00208 $46.89 1212562 V. 01126 31712 ' 24 EQUIP KtNI/NUV aY 12 bed 1U/d/EIY FIRE /TELEPHONE $0.00 11/07/89 25 26 R GTEL 01340 001-400-2201-4304 00209 *92.56 1212562 01126 31712 27 EQUIP'RENT7NQV 8Y 1256 —10722/bY I- ME / I ELEPRUNE $0: O0 11 /07/99 2� 30 4*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $139.45 a2 3�a 341 - R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 00731 001-400-3103-4311 00498 $445.30 1C12561 09500 31713 3 STREET SWEEPER PARTS T256T10719797 ST`MAINTENANCE /AUTD–M INTENANCE $443731"1-17087$93 3F R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 00731 001-400-4205-4309 00411 *655.66 1W2636 10002 31713 4 bIKEET—SWtE'ER hEYAIR W 46 1U/27/IiY E0UiP uhuvrcE F1AINTENANCE MATERIALS $620.60 11/08/89 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,100.96 ., 43 .•, 46 R FRANK D. *HALL & CO. OF CALIF. 03147 705-400-1210-4201 00039 47 $1.484.70 541437 09736 31714 46 7 PUB tin,' BLANISEI BUND 414,17 lU/Ub/t' AUIU/PROP/DUNDS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRTVAT $0.00 11708/89 44• SO 3p *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,484.70 az 40 53 41 64 42 R OFCR JOHN*HARRIS 03058 001-400-2101-4317 00137 $30.80 TR260 10142 31715 66 43 KEIMU IKAVtL EXPENSE IKd60 1U/12/b9 POLICE /CUNPERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 11/08/89 67 44 a8 4 s *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************at******************** $30. 80 60 so 46 e1 47 62 46 R L. C.*HAWKING 03130 001-400-1206-4201 00642 16352.49 18779 09517 31716 64 40 REI-INIbe Ori. I-UKN/U. P. ltl//Y, 1WjU/WV UAIA YKOCESSIN(•i /CUNIRACT SERV10E/PRTVAT $352.49 11/08/89 63 .o 64 ,, *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************at********************************* $352.49 67 68 '2 VD 33 70 S472 R VELMA*HAZEN 02057 001-210-0000-2110 03353 71 *50.00 86592 09861 31717 55 AIQIMAL TRAP REFUND 86wY2 1170a/uv /U.PUSIIS/WUHK 6UAHANIEE $0.00 11/08/09 73 36 •74 73 7? i2 AAA ✓ 3 ., 7 P 0 CITY OF H.HMUSA DEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0015 TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 N 2 4 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 6 7 *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************.*************************** $50.00 9 0 2 11 R HERMOSA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 00322 001-400-2401-4201 00211 $224.00 01027 31718 ,4 15 16 ,7 18 t0 70 r. 14 ,6 MIbL (.HGS7U(.I 89 1U/.1/8y ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/07/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $224.00 " 17 o R HERMOSA BCH CHAMBER OF COMM. 00643 001-400-1101-4201 00044 $2,500.00 09130 31719 2, 22 24 24 D PM►/CNKISIr3Ab DtLUK ll/U//Sy CITY CUUNCTL /CONTRACT SERVICETPRIVAT $0.00 11/08/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,500.00 25 26 z: 2 1.. 12.: R HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOC. 03131 001-400-1202-4201 00185 $900.00 1002 00075 31720 w '�, .7 n ,o LiALtb TAA KtPIG/161 UM 1UUd IU7107t3y FINANCE, ADMIN /CONTRACT StHVTCE/PRIVAT $0.00 81/08/89 ` *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $900.00 32 u 35 34 R MARCIA*NINES 00336 001-300-0000-3826 00555 850.00 85340 09067 31721 RE —ti 368 301 41 42 .. 43 46 47` 49 49 50 S1 11 53 54 555 56 q r, 19 ,, A' ,2 t35s4U TOTI978v40 /REG PRUGRAMS/CLAbSES $0.00 11/08/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 R HYATT REGENCY MONTEREY 00559 001-400-1121-4317 00050 $107.80 TR264 00264 31722 HOTEr-ADVANCE/L.RIDLILt TKd64 11/01/wv I.lIY CLERK /CUNFtKENGE EXPENSE $0.00 11/08/89 R HYATT REGENCY MONTEREY 00559 001-400-1122-4317 00030 $107.80 TR264 00264 31722 HOTEL-ADVANCEy1_—RIDDLL IKd64 11/01,UY ECECT1UN5 PENSL $0.00 11/08/8- *** R TOTAL******************************************************************** $215.60 •'� 14 45 11 V 4" R ICMA 00157 001-400-1201-4305 00140 $415.00 201168 09129 31723 i 57 66 0o� 61 62 935 .4 SUBSCRIPTION"RENEWAt u11bts iv/II/by C 1 I V -MANAGER /uFF 1c.E iJPER SUPPCIEs Woo 11708769 *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************�t*****et***it*i!***►it********it*�t+tat*****�t****�t $415.00 49 50 „ R IMPERIAL FORMS 01258 110-400-3302-4305 00620 $332.71 717 08795 31724 63 66 667 g 9 .2 53 94 ET-RENEWAC-FORMS 717 UY/4!l/tly PAHKTN0 ENF /UFFit. 'E-UPEN SUPPLILS $302.46 11/08789 69 70 7t 77 55 S6 1.1.T. 73 74 7e 7 J V V v o/ v 1 3 4 7 8 t• • 51 X41 42 u 44 ' 45• 4 4 4' 50 '11 :5 5 55 58 7 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 PAGE 0016 DATE 11/08/89 1\ 2 ; YV 4 4 4 5 5 54 55 I FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST :1 L 1 1 Y UF—RERMUbA UI A(.H TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 PAGE 17 DATE 11/08/89/ PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ************•n*********** t**a*****•n**•It****•x•**+t*•a•x•******* t+t**•n+t******* $418.90 R LOS ANGELES TIMES/TIMES MIRROR 03139 001-210-0000-2110 03362 $100.00 86756 09864 31732 DAMAGE Dtr '-SS7g *** VENDOR TOTAL*******•r************************************************************ $100.00 0 e e or R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. 00079 ' 110-400-3302-4187 00204 $223.33 OF GES710KG 243948 08785 31733 $223.:13 11/t3= :- 244019 08800 31733 93948 10/10/89 YAKKING tN- /UN1PUKP7 ALLUWANt:t R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. 00079 110-400-3302-4187 00205 $472.60 UNIF7DUCDT7MERRITT 44019--10719789 FARKING-ENI/UNIFORM-ALCOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $695.93 $472.60-'-11/08/89 R M.J.C. PROPERTIES 01504 180-300-0000-3912 00180 $4,326.31 69104 07591 31734 $0.00-1T70879- REFUND-DEPOSI 1 69t04-1-0/25789 /1-1HE I -LOW FkE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $4,326.31 , R PATRICIA*MAHONEY 03133 001-210-0000-2110 03352 $50.00 86513 09862 31735 ANIMAL -TRAP -86513--1T702789 a REFUND—' /1J EFDSITS7WORl-GUARANTEE- $0. b0—r1/0$/84 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 R MAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 00426 001-400-4204-4309 01465 $124.62 01035 31736 MISC'-CHGS70CTBY 10/31789 d TACE -MATERIALS e** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $124.62 $0700 11/6770- R MAINT. SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOC 01B22 001-400-3104-4309 00353 $40.00 DUES7D7-10CSON 1:19-.1 89-3 10053 31737 IU72b/139 iRAFFIC-SAFETY /MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40.00 80.00 11/08/89 e � R MANHATTAN CAR WASH 01146 001-400-2101-4311 00754 $76.00 00936 31738 e e e MISC-CHCS/btr tlY UY/JV/tlY IOLICt /AU10 MAIRIENANCt $23.00 11/0775- 6 7 7 7 7 3 J 4 e 10 ,1 12 ,a 14 ,5 J 16 17 1e le 70 2 2./ 4 5 6 7.J 1V 5'J v 4) 4 5 7‘64' 8 , 56) 2 3 4 5 MO 6 8 9 0 x ay► 6 2 4 5 7 0 7 10 1 • • C1IY OF MEKMUSA BEAK 11 FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0018 2 TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 2 4 5 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 6 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • • w R MANHATTAN CAR WASH 01146 001-400-4101-4311' 00098 $3.80 00936 31738 11 12 MISC CHGS7SEP-8'i U4730789MAINTENANCE $6700 11-707/89 *2 .4 R MANHATTAN CAR WASH 01146 001-400-4101-4311 00099 $60.00 08657 31738 16 16 GAR-DETAILINW/rLANN1NW 1U/J1/1:1Y FLANNIN6 /AUIU MAINIENANCE $0.00 11/08/89 17 16 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $139.80 1 200 21 22 R MBTA 03146 001-400-1121-4317 00051 $81.50 TR264 00264 31739 22 IRA • ' I • • - • . - - • -- -11Y CLEWS /C.UNFEKENCE EXt'ENSE $0.00 11/08/89 25 26 R MBTA 03146 001-400-1122-4317 00031 $81.50 TR264 00264 31739 27 2e -TRAVEL DV7LRIbULE 1 Kd64--71701 /13Y ELIC 1 1UNS hNCt EXPE.NS'E $0.00 11708/89 20 30 31 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $163.00 02 33 34 R MEDI-PURE CORPORATION 03127 001-400-2101-4306 00710 $84.88 2181-9 10143 31740 26 ie — ----1B1-4 PRISONER EXAM GLOVES 10720/u ruLic.t /r(ISUNEN MAINItNARCE $84.88 11/0111789 37 20 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $84.88 40 41 42 R DEAN*MENART 02625 001-400-2101-4312 01086 $48.00 10157 31741 45 44 'MEALS/TRAFFIC. CLASS 1I701/HY NOETCE /1KAVtL LXPENSE • PDEI $0760-1-1760789-46 46 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $48.00 47 46 4W 60 R KATHLEEN*MIDSTOKKE 01549 001-400-1122-4317 00032 $64.80 JR275 00275 31742 71 52 MOTEL ADV7K M IJbIUPKKE 1Kd/b 1U/26/bY LL XPLNS'E $0.00 11/08/89 53 54 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $64.80 956 57 58 R LESLIE*MILLER 02331 001-210-0000-2110 03350 $1.525.00 74806 09873 31743 so WORK -GUAR -REFUND /4806 11702789 K GUARANTEE $0T0 11/0878q-----; F? R LESLIE*MILLER 02331 001-210-0000-2110 03357 $150.00 74806 09871 31743 e. ^. ■ . 1 :._ . _ . '■ R.-' .• ••' O. • • .8/89 85 66 ea *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.675. 00 6e CO 70 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 00388 001-400-2101-4310 00210 $53.56 00963 31744 772 Mibc GMtaS/btr tlY 1U/1U/bY NULILE /MUIUH FUELS AND LUDES $0.00 11/07/89 73 74 75 74 J v •1 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0019 t\ z 3 TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 4 5 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 5 4 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ' e 7 • 10 0 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 00388 001-400-2201-4310 00099 $24.95 00963 31744 ---FIRE 1 MISC CHCS/SEP-89 10710789 /MOTOR FUELS AND—CUBES 46.00 11707707----4 11 14 m00963 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 00388 110-400-3302-4310 00102 $30.12 31744 mto 17 , MISC CMGs/SEr SY lU/1U/UY PARKING ENF /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES *0.00 11/07/89 14 18 tb *** VENDOR TOTAL******+r+r+r#*+r***************************************+ t• *******#•Ir*+r+r+r*a* $108. 63 0 n 21 t7 zz 15 R MONARCH BROOM 00084. 001-400-3103-4309 00912 $1,026.66 01038 31745 23 24 17 Mibc.. CHAKGEb/UCt d9 1O/31-/bY ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 11/07/89 zb :11z6 ,t *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,026.66 2' 22: 30 • R MONTEREY PLAZA HOTEL 03149 001-400-1206-4317 00051 $240.00 272 00272 31746 31 32 MO1tL HDV/M. b,c1H • • . • .. • t ■ t - • • • • • 8/89 as 34 7 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $240.00 361 ,a 37 36 R MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 00556 001-400-1131-4201 00524 $2,852.46 21059 09321 31747 439 4p 0 CODE—SUPPLEMENT—COPIES 4lUSY UY/d9/UY CITY ATTORNEY /CUNIKACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/08/89 O/ 42 _*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,852.46 — 43' 44 45 45 •4 R NATL PUBLIC EMPLOYER LABOR 03148 001-400-1203-4315 00044 4122.50 52 09744 31748 47 08 • .: 1U/1Y/tiv PERSONNEL /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 11/08/89 4+ XI 37 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 5tt $122.50 52 40 53 et 54 42 R OCEAN DRIVE COLLISION & PAINT 02805 001-202-0000-2020 00968 $728.63 08562 31749 ,e 43 BODY REr3AIK/rAIKUL LAK 1U/POYEIY /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $0.00 11/08/89 57 04 58 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 591 45 $728.63 00 •4 61 .17 62 48 R OLGUIN—RUTHERFORD 61917 180-300-0000-3912 00181 $2,795.31 71576 07592 31750 04 49 KtrVNL DErublr 71576. 10/25/69 /FIRE FLOW FEE $0.00 11/08/89 65 50 66 g *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,795.31 67, 44 52 64 53• 70 54 R RHETT*OLMSTEAD 03141 001300-0000-3115 02261 $78.00 84862 01790 3175171 72 55 t IAJb LICNbt KtrUNU ,141362 11/U6/UY /BUSINESS LICENSE $0.00 11/08/89 73 55 74 75 ti 7iY J 9) 9) r T„ A. 4, 42 43 44 48 a•. 48 40, ao� 51 32 3, 18 9 1117 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 PAGE 0020 DATE 11/08/89 0 2 4 a e PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC CHK # DATE EXP 9 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************* •#********************** •***#*a***•tF $78.00 12 n 14 R OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 00093 160-400-3102-4311 10 00127 $1,513.00 11549 08189 31752 lel 1iODY—WORK7SEwER—TROCK 11 49 UFI/2.ildV SEWER/57 DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 11/08/017-----17 19 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******it•*i****•p•x•*itx•1HhltiFlNtiF****x••x***iNHE•x•*****1t•*******#THF#u•iFiF#iturit••R•#ti*** $1,513.00 20 21 22 R OSTERBAUER COMPRESSOR SERVICE 03096. 001-400-4205-5401 00006 $452.63 96454 10027 31753 22 25 2 HP—COMPRESSO-. • CO. .. !I - _ -., R 9 26 *** VENDOR TOTAL***•***************************************************************** $452.63 0 .10 JO R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 00321 001-400-2101-4304 00449 $168.91 00036 31754 31 COMP tINES7OCT Y Iu/JI/HY POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 11/07789 33 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************u•**************************•u•*****x•************•�a•** $168.91 �� 47 au R POM INCORPORATED 00223 110-400-3302-4309 00608 $724.22 910164 09916 3175530 40 TNG—Mh1ER PAR1b 1U164 1U/1U/9Y PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $728.66 11/08/89 41 42 *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************•*************************** $724.2241 44 4: 44 R PRIMA 02366 705-400-1209-4315 47 00003 $168.00 0002 09740 31756 411 DUES/R. ULACI4WOUD UUU2 lU/IY/UY LIAUILI TY INS /MEMBERSHIP *0.00 11/08/$9-4a 80 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $168.00 s2 33 84 R PRINTMASTERS 00350 001-400-2101-4201 00475 $204.48 20868 10134 31757 86 PULiLE EXI.EPI1UN bL1Pb 2UF161:1 1U/2;1/1:1Y POLICE /CUNIRACI SEH VICE/PRIVAT $204.48 11/08/89 57 50 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $204.48 ec I a: R REGIONAL TRAINING CENTER 01125 001-400-2101-4312 01085 $237.00 10159 31758 64 IUi I TUN/G. BROWN I1/U2/L3Y POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 11/08/89 65 66 *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************************•***************** $237.00 67 ae CO 70 R OFCR DAVID*RICKEY 00949 001-400-2101-4312 01081 840.82 10151 31759 72 MILEAGE ME1MU/DUI CLA55 10/d5/BY PULICh /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 11/08/89 72 74 77 79 rp 6 5 r. ., + 4 • % 8 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 5 5 1 C L 1 Y UF• HLUMUSA BEACH • FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0022 TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 i1 : 43 • PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK # •DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 6 e • • y_ R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 001-400-2201-4305 00312 $21.83 01047 31766 —" "CHCS/OCT-8'I 9 10 t1 • MISC 10/31789 1 -IRE /OFFICE"DPER-SUPPCIES $0.00---11/07/89,3 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY00114 001-400-2401-4305 00134 $21.35 01047 14 16 31766 NiSC-CHCS/uc I Ii'1 1U/JT7E9 S 0.00 li7if7/89-,7 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY00114 - 001-400-4601-4308 00214 $92.32 01047 31766 16 10 .• MISC—CH0STOCT-89 IU/.41/139 COI`IM REs0URC6S /HHUGHAM MA I LH IALS $0700---T1707/89 VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $167.62 2t 22*** 2= R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR.00843 145-400-3403-4251 00053 $839.00 48616 09926 31767 24 25 26 27 BUS PASS"SALESTSEP-E9 48616- 10709789 UUS PASS-SUBSDY-7CORTR"ACT-SERVICE7GDCIT-- $0:00-11708/89---d9 *** VENDOR TOTAL«•*********************+I•********************************************* $839.00 34 3z R SOURISSEAU SUPPORT SERVICES02075 001-400-2101-4201 00476 $360.00 1389 10145 31768 —"BACKGRND' INVESTIGATIONS —1389-10724789 73 3i 35 POLICE /CONTRACT-SERVICE7PR1VAT $0.00 11708707 R SOURISSEAU SUPPORT SERVICES02075 001-400-2101-4201 00479 $360.00 1395 10156 3U 30 31768 ACKGRND-INVE5116A11UN 1.195 1U/IU/SY HOLICE -- /LONIRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $720.00 N 42 43 R SOUTH BAY COALITION ALIVE01288 140-400-4706-4201 00002 $252.68 08651 31769 44 4•. 44. 47 t.UNIH• 1 - •48 o. • • 0 = /89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $252.68 46• 50. ;2 RSOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-400-2101-4201 00477 $62.95 10147 31770 53 64 56 BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTS 11/01/89 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/08/89 67 58 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************659 $6a. 9s 60 0 61 62 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00400 110-300-0000-3302 30302 $271.00 09938 31771 e. C11AI1UN COURT BAIL 11/02/89 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 11/08/89 •s 66 *** VENDOR TOTAL**x•***************************************************************** $271.00 07' es 69 • 70 RSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00211 $14,283.61 00013 31772 772' ST LIFE BILLS/SEP 89 09/30/89 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES $0.00 11/07/89 73 74 R 76 7q ':J 14. J J J J J J J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 PAGE 0023 DATE 11/08/89 1N 2 4 PAY VENDOR NAME VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4• AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD 4 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC CHK 4 DATE EXP 6 6 e 0 to *** VENDOR TOTAL * ***•*********************************************************** $14.283.61• 11 /2 13 14 R SOUTHERN PACIFIC ASSOC. OF 00543 001-400-4601-4308 00216 $150.00 15 09066 50.00 31773 11/08/89 16 17 r bANLIIUN F•EEii-Y YU 1U/1//ai CUMM HESUUHC;ES /FKUGKAM MAIERIALS 16 f *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************************** $150.00 * * /6 20 s 2/ 22 7 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00242 $2,705.00 2424 00029 31774 24 24 , SWEEP SEKV/bEY HY d4d4 UY/JO/HY bT MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/FRIVAT $0.00 11/07/89 25 26 RSPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 0011.5 110-400-3301-4201 00230 43,695.00 2424 SWEEP-SERV7SEP-8Y 00029 31774 27 d44------2u973U/aY VER-PKG-DISI /CUNIHALTSERViCE7PRTIVAT— $d:0o 11 707789 79 30 , *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $6.400.00 31 33 3.. RMARGUERITE*STURGES 00620 001-400-1206-4317 00050 4120.00 272 -ADVANCE- 00272 31775 J6 36 PER DIEM d 11/01/bY VATA-PROCESSING /CUNF'EHENCE-EXPENSE $0.00 11/08/89 37 1 30 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************•n•************************************************* $120.00 40 41 42 RSUPER SPORTS 02768 001-400-4601-4308 00215 4415.14 5201 09054 31776 43 40 VOLLEYBALLS7FACt-CLASSES-5201- 1072478Y t,OMM-RESOURCE TERTACS $4157T4 11/00/81,-----45 46 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $415.14 47 48 46 50 RTODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 001-400-6101-4309 00774 4142.02 01057 31777 ;_ MISC-CHGb/uC, U9 IU/J1/tib F'AHkS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 11/07/89 53 54 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $142.02 e 57 50 R CITY OF*TORRANCE 00841 145-400-3402-4201 00138 43.376.23 100387 08655 31778 co t.ITY-SHAREfCOMMUTEH FHOG-003U/ 107T879Y COMMUTER-BUS-7CONTRACT SERVICES $0.710 11/08TS — 61 62 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3.376.23 6634 65 66 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-2101-4309 00241 436.37 01058 31779 64 /SC-CHGb/ut. T t3- 1 - ' ■ • ` ` • ' E MAl ERIALS $0.00 11/07797-79 70 71 72 73 74 76 7'• J J J J J J J 36 7 42 44 45 4c 47 48 49 ,1 .a 13 54 55 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:40:20 C1('( UF-FIERMOSA JTEACK DEMAND LIST FOR 11/14/89 PAGE DATE 0024 11/08/89 1\ 1 . PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # DATE INVC ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP a 6 7e 9 to R TRIANGLE HARDWARE —MISC"CHGS/OCT"89 00123 001-400-2201-4309 00754 4102.40 01058 31779 11 10/31799 FIRE- ----7MXINTENANCE- MATERIALS $0: oO' '-ii%07/84 14 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-2201-4311 00297 420.38 01058 31779 16 n1SC-"CHGS7UCI a 1u/31/ay FIH $0.00 11/07189 17 18 '" R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-3103-4309 00913 436.00 01058 31779 ;0 MISC-•CHGS70CT-B9 107:37769 ST-MA'IRTEM1TRNCh /MAINTENANCE-HATERTAE 40TOo11707789 21 zz R TRIANGLE HARDWARE. 00123' 001-400-3103-4311 00497 44.00 01058 31779 z. MISC-CHGS7UCT-BY 1u/J1/ate/ hi M. ' •u ■ .• t 1.1 0.00 11/07/89 .s 26 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-3104-4309 00351 485.27 01058 31779 27 "--'"---"MISC"CHGS/OCT-89"- '7: 10/31/89 TRAFFIC-SAFETY-7MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS 40:00-11/07/89 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-4204-4309 01464 $497.95 01058 31779 31 , MIbc CHGS/U(.I HY 10/:i1/8Y ULLG MA1Nf /MATNTT_NANCE MATERIALS $0.00 11/07/89 33 34 '_.. R TRIANGLE HARDWARE --- 00123 001-400-4205-4311 00147 411.65 01058 31779 15 r. MISC' CHGS/OCT 89 10/31 /HY EGUIP-SENvICE /Au f0 MAINTENANCE $0.00---11-707289 .7 35 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-6101-4309 00773 495.47 01058 31779 ao 40 r• M1bC-CRL5/uCi HY 10/JI/69 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 11/07/89 41 42 -"' R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 105-400-2601-4309 00539 447.07 01058 31779 43 MISC-CHGS/OCT-89 10731-/B4------STREET-E11HT1T0 /MAINTEI NCE MATERIALS $0.00 11/07/89 4a 46 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 110-400-3302-4309 00607 413.97 01058 31779 47 40 MMb.. LHt,b/ULT 1:19 10/31/89 PARKING BNF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 11/07/89 40 50 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************.*********************** 4950.53 6z 53 54 R UNION WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02960 001-400-3104-5401 00006 4201.22 18682 09427 31780 a6 DHLLL/I3AIIEHY CHARGER 18682 08/23/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN 480 $201.24 11/08/89 07 58 R UNION WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02960 001-400-3104-5401 00007 490.15 18682 10030 31780 60 BATTERY-& CHARGER7MAKITA-TESS2-09723789 TRAFFIC -SAFETY /EDUIPMENT-LESS THAN 450 490.15 11/08/89 fl1 02 *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************.3**************************************** $291.37 6. 65 66 R T.M.*WEBB 01055 001-400-2401-4201 00212 4170.00 8594/8595 09928 31781 69 EE-REMOV bY5 10/26/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/08/89 80 70 n 72 73 74 75 7,, r/ 3J +cJ Ku; t; f J. '_i �+ C 1 1 Y OF HEHMOSA MACH 1\ FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0025 2 MTIE 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 • A s PAY VENDOR NAME VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * • DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • C 9 f0 11 *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************#+r**********a*+tom*aa***#**a***********#**** $170.00 f: :1 " ., 17 4 R WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE 01152 001-400-1203-4201 00592 $221.00 11927 09739 31782 10 16 14 1s EMPLOYEE-AUb 11`id/ 10/lu/aY t .N LUNIKACf b HV1C /PR1VAT $0.00 11/08/89 17 10 *** VENDOR TOTAL'x•******a*u*+f*u••n•*•n******a*a•u*•u*********•lf*****a*af**********+f********+f+f $221. 00 40 79 I7 19 21 zz R WESTERN GOVTL RESEARCH ASSOC. 01110• 001-400-1203-4201 00593 $58.40 8454 09742 31783 23 24 o tMP-A• • _ KI. • ' . tbUNNtL /UNIKAI.1 btKV1Lt/rK1VA1 $0.00 11 789--25 J� 2• *** VENDOR TOTAL************•ltaf****************************************************** $58.40 n 70 79 .. w 1 R WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS 00131 001-400-3104-4309 00352 $2,717.88 09424 31784 3 PARTS—F■ - - , _ - - -_ 33 98/89 as 34 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,717.88 36 30 37 30 R SALLY A. *WHITE 00140 001-400-4102-4201 00227 $331.50 08652 31785 31.1 40 SEC-SERV/10-3-b, 1U/1//aY PLANNING GUMM /CONTRACT SERV10E7PRIVAT $0.00 11/08/6 4f 42 R SALLY A. *WHITE 00140 001-400-4102-4201 00228 $306.00 08658 31785 O4 '.: SEC SERV/10-178T------- 11/0178', PEANNING-COMM/CORTRACT-SERVICE7PRIV•AT $0: 00 i1708/69 45 46 ,c47 VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $637.50 ae 1.• 49 )O !O ,9 R MARK *WRIGHT 00133 001-400-2101-4312 01084 $206.00 10154 31786 51 JU 1, MEALS1INFORMANT CLAbb 1u//aY rOETC� /TRAVEL tXPEN , 08/89 s3 11 54 42 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $206.00 56 43 D7 44 50 45 XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00193 $321.08 523691527 00049 31787 -, 44 LEASE-PMT7NOV-89 -91 s2 / 11/02789 GEN-, PPRO AVMENT£ $07W---11701709-----61 47 02 40 R XEROX CORPORATION 60135 001-400-1208-6900 00194 $238.16 523691526 00050 31787 64 49 LEAb-t rPII/Nuv aY YIs26. 11/0d/BY GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 11/01/89 65 SO 67 51 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00195 $943.72 523691049 00048 31787 en +2 LtASE-PMT7Nuv 89 Y1U4Y 11/U/aY GEN AI'PKUI /LLASt PAYMENTS $0.00 11/07/89-----4W 53 70 71 54 72 55 73 50 74 75 t7 79, ..J .J I in 11 : , 0 1s ..a 1 i ur f1CRIluQm ummdi FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0026 TIME 15:40:20 FOR 11/14/89 DATE 11/08/89 11 2 4 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP a' 6 e a' lc t2 13 14 13 17 18 /O 201 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-2201-6900 00094 $47.62 523691523 00053 31787 LEASE-PMT/NOV-89'--91523--11702789 -PAYMENTS FIRE /LEASE $0.00 - 11/07/89 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-2401-6900 00049 $56.15 523691524 00051 31787 LEA ■ • _ - ■ - 1 ■ 1 - ■ $07W$a11/07/89 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-4601-6900 00050 $189.21 523691525 00052 31787 c. ,7 ,, • SE'PIIIT•/NOV-8Y Y < 0MM < RESOORi LE !LEASE WAVREN 15 SO:W—=707789 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135: 110-400-3302-6900 00134 $114.00 523691524 00051 31787 22 2, 21 to 28 27 26 til 30 31 32 LEASE-PMT/NOV 89 91524 l I /Ud+/tlY I'4AHR1N(s ENF /LEASE 1'AYMEN I S $0.00 11/G7/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL****•**a**************************pax•**••uatu•n••u•+t•itq•p•at*•x••u•aott*•x•it•iaa*it•it•r**at•x•*** $1.909.94 R ZAVATSKY BARREL 00316 001-400-3103-4309 00914 $213.00 1079 10031 31788 • - -ELEPTACLEU :7 -• 10/Y ltlfdblUY bl MALNIENANLE /MA1NTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 11/08/89 R ZAVATSKY BARREL 00316 001-400-6101-4309 00776 $213.00 1079 10031 31788 33 34 36 33 '� 40 TRASH-RECEPTACLEb 1079-1-w726789 -o -11708/89-,1 F+ARK 3 /MA1NTENANCE—MATERTALs $0 -o *** VENDOR TOTAL****�a*1t•*an•*a•n•it•*a•*•x•1t•tt••x•n1[•a••p•aa•*****la+tu•a•*a•a• •*a•***a•*para•a•*•p•a•*u••rt••x*an•a•*a•**#a• $426.00 .I' *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $113,578.61 41 42 43 44 4! 46 ,e *** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** $146,654.10 1l I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR LAIMS COVERED BY 4Y sSI0 5211R 1O 41 at THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGE 0 CLUSIVE OF THE WARRANT REGISTER FOR // ARE ACCURATE AND FUND RE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT 63 as 55 56 57 a0 sa 6O 41 44 IS TNvacnc. B / FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR =c 47�� 46 AATE II 61 a2 63 4 64 40 SO SI 6564 07 68 s2 53 a4 0 70 714 72 ss 56 C7 l7 74 70 ti r 26, 4.7 1� 4 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 6, 1989 City Council Meeting of November 14, 1989 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of October 1989. Respectfully submitted, Gary Bru-sch City Tr•asurer NOTED: �Chi 'Kevin I4orthcraft City Manager ld INVESTMENT REPORT - OCTOBER 1989 INSTITUTION TOTAL DATE OF INVESTMENT DATE OF MATURITY INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 10/01/89 $2,760,000.00 Withdrawal (2,000,000.00) Withdrawal (50,000.00) Investment 500,000.00 Withdrawal (150,000.00) Balance 10/31/89 LACPIF BALANCE 10/01/89 Investment Balance 10/31/89 10/16/89 10/03/89 10/04/89 10/23/89 $1,060,000.00 8.833% $1,644,363.76 2,000,000.00 10/04/89 3,644,363.76 10.06% SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST U.S. Treasury Note 24,634.28 9/27/89 3/1/90 7.8% U.S. Treasury Note 500,000.00 9/27/89 8/15/94 8.3% U.S. Treasury Note 4,351,928.77 9/27/89 12/21/89 7.036% CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT: Union Federal S&L Investment $ 500,000.00 3/7/89 3/7/90 Community Bank Investment $ 500,000.00 12/8/88 12/8/89 9.50% 9.00% City National Bank Investment $ 500,000.00 3/30/89 3/23/90 City National Bank Investment $ 500,000.00 4/25/89 4/25/90 City National Bank Investment $ 500,000.00 5/22/89 5/17/90 CORPORATE NOTES: Ford Motor Credit Co. Investment Merrill Lynch & Co. Investment $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 5/19/88 5/20/93 6/30/88 1/2/90 10.30% 10.00% 9.45% 9.10% 8.35% U.S. TREASURY NOTE: Investment $ 500,937.94 2/22/89 1/31/91 9.20% Investment $ 505,551.17 3/13/89 3/31/90 9.45% Investment' $ 506,721.33 3/21/89 3/31/90 9.61% FHLMC: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Investment $ 248,733.64 TOTAL BALANCE $14,842,870.89 Respectfully Submitted, /�- Gary Brut h City Treasurer 3/26/87 3/1/17 8.0% November 1, 1989 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL November 14, 1989 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #19579 (C.U.P. CON NO. 88-6) LOCATION: 533 MONTEREY BOULEVARD APPLICANT: IVARS R. JANIEKS REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #19579 which is consistent with the approved Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map #19579 at their May 3, 1988 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. Respectfully submitted, CONCUR: Michael`Schubach Planning Director / Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager T/srfinmap /Ken Robertson Associate Planner le 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #19579 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 533 MONTEREY BOULEVARD, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on November 14, 1989 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 88-39, adop- ted after public hearing on May 3, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #19579 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 19, Tract No. 1074, as recorded in Book 17, Pages 137 of Map, in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 533 Monterey Boulevard, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 1989. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: MALALL A'. Via( T/rsfinmap PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 ,October 26, 1989 t. Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of November 14, 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE SALE OF FORFEITED PROPERTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 11473.3 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the sale of the forfeited property listed herein through Nationwide Commercial Auctions Systems. BACKGROUND: At the regular City Council meeting of May 10, 1988, Council approved the proce- dures for handling assets which are seized and forfeited by the Police Department. These procedures call for the sale of forfeited property to be approved by Council. The City currently uses the auction services of Nationwide Commercial Auctions Systems to dispose of property which is no longer needed. Nationwide has proven to be very efficient in processing our items and have gotten good returns for the property. ANALYSIS:' There have been several vehicles seized by the Police Department because they were used to conduct narcotics transactions. Forfeiture proceedings have been filed on each of the seized vehicles, which we store while waiting final adjudication from the courts. Two of the vehicles, a 1979 Dodge Brougham Motorhome , Vin: F34KT9V701187; and a 1984 Chevrolet Corvette, Vin: 1G1AY9787E5100501, were awarded to the Department. We have received the Declaration of Forfeitures from the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury which allows us to sale or use the vehicles. Based on evaluation of each of the vehicles, staff feels it in the best interest of the City to sale the vehicles immediately. Because the sale of forfeited property generates public scrutiny, sales are required to be at arms length. Independent auction companies are considered the best way to dispose of forfeited property, and this method has been used by the City in the past. As stated earlier, we have used Nationwide Auction Systems for past auction ser- vices with success and staff recommends that they be used to sale the vehicles. Res pgF fully Sub fitted, Steve S. Wisniewski Director of Public Safety CONCUR: evin B. North raft, City Manager ji: DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY t. U.S. CUSTOMS SERVICE LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA O C ,T 111 1C89 Seizure No. 89-2704-00212 DECLARATION OF SUMMARY FORFEITURE In accordance with the provisions of Title 19, United States Code, Section 1607 and Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 162.45, the following described property was forfeited at the close of business on July 17, 1989. 1979•Dodge Brougham Motorhome, VIN: F34KT9V701187 Notice of Seizure and Intent to Forfeit was published in the Los Angeles Herald Examiners, Los Angeles, California, for three consecutive weeks, as required by law, on July 3, 1989, July 10, 1989 & July.,17, 1989. John H. Heinrich District Director Edward H. Webb Director, Fines, Penalties and Forfeitures "OWNERSHIP HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM THE U.S. CUSTOMS SERVICE TO THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT." Edward H. Webb Director, Fines, Penalties and Forfeitures REPLY TOs DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF CUSTOMS. 300 S0. FERRY STREET. TERMINAL ISLAND. CA 90731 -a 2-! THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT CERTIFICATE OF RELEASE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE (see lestructlees on reverse) CERTIFICATE NO. R1 -89—X030 The undersigned DEPARTMENT or AGENCY of the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT certifies that the motor ve- hicle described herein, the property of the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, has been transferred this day of 19.§2_, to the Transferee designated herein; and that this is the first transfer of such vehi• cle in ordinary trade and commerce subsequent to acquisition thereof by the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT. TRANSFEREE (Nemo of dealer, Indhrldual, eta) GEORGE P. GARRETT INVESTIGATIONS/ NARCOTICS, HERMOSA P.D. ADDRESS OF TRANSFEREE (Mate Include ZIP Code) 540 PIER AVE. HERMOSA BEACH, CA. 90254 TRANSFEROR (Accountable •Nlc. 1.e., department or agency; subunits and whimsy. Including ZIP cods) UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE 312 NORTH SPRING ST LOS ANGELES, CA. 90012 MAKE OF VEHICLEYEAR SERIES OR MODEL CHEVY 119841 CORVETTE ENGINE NO. = MANUFACTURER'S SERIAL NO. IVIN: 1G1AY9787E510051 TYPE OF VEHICLE • AUTOMOBILE KIND OF BODY t NUMBER OF CYLINDERS' HP. (SAE) i 8 FUEL GASOLINE NUMBER Of AXLES $ NUMBER OF DUAL WHEELS t TIRES ; ❑ SOLID M PNEUMATIC WEIGHT (Shipping) NO. OFPASSENGERS$ WHEELBASE $ MANUFACTURER'S RATED CAPACITY SALE PRICE ODOMETER MILEAGE STATEMENT Federal Regulations require you to state the odometer mileage upon transfer of ownership. An inaccurate or untruthful statement may make you' liable for damages to your transferee, for attorney fees, and for civil or criminal penalties, pursuant to Sections 409, 412, and 413 of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act of 1972 (Public Law 92-513, as amended by Public Law 94-364) I, state that to the best of my knowledge, based upon United States Government records, the odometer of the vehicle described above reads miles/kilometers. CHECK ONE BOX ONLY: ❑ 1. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that to the best of my knowledge, the odometer reading as stated above reflects the actual mileage of the vehicle described above. ❑2. I HEREBY CERTIFY that to the best of my knowledge, the odometer reading as stated above reflects the amount of mileage In excess of designed mechanical odometer limit of 99,999 miles/kilometers of the vehicle described above. ❑3. I HEREBY CERTIFY that to the best of my knowledge, the odometer reading as stated above Is not the actual mileage of the vehicle described above, and should not be relied upon. CHECK ONE BOX ONLY: ❑ 4. I HEREBY CERTIFY that to the best of my knowledge, the odometer of said vehicle was not altered, set back, or disconnected while in my possession and I have no knowledge of anyone else doing so. ❑5. I HEREBY CERTIFY that to the best of my knowledge, the odometer was altered for repair or replacement purposes while in my possession, and that the mileage registered on the repaired or replacement odometer was identical to that before such service. ❑6. I HEREBY CERTIFY that to the best of my knowledge, the repaired or replacement odometer was incapable of registering the same mileage, that it was reset to zero, and that the mileage on the original odometer or the odometer before repair was SIGNATURE OF TRANSFEROR'S (Seller's) REPRESV,,E// ROY SUCHIYAMAv�� TITLE DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL SIONAT DATE DATE %--'-8S • Au mobile. station wja�n, smbutinc ruck motor or tractor, tra Siler, bus, motorcycle. motor scooter, etc. toomobile•coupe, two. or leur•door den. truck•picku Pond, re go, stake, Platform, trsiler•pole, dolly, able reel, bogie, ink (give tipsily) etc. =.Whoa applicable. See Instructions 0 11811 7940-00-814-4047 97-100 STANOARO FORM 17 (REY. 7-71) Prescribed by OSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-10-701 Previous Edition Not Womble -- October 26, 1989 .Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council City Council Meeting of November 14, 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION AND UPGRADE OF FIRE HYDRANTS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the attached agreement which requires Vasek Polak to upgrade and install fire hydrants which service his project at 2901 Pacific Coast Highway. BACKGROUND: Vasek Polak BMW located at 2901 Pacific Coast Highway is engaged in a project to improve the facility. Because of the project, fire flow requirements call for the installation of a new hydrant and the upgrade of an existing hydrant. ANALYSIS:• The fire flow requirements placed on the project call for the upgrade of the existing hydrant in the 280 block of Pacific Coast Highway to 1500 gallons per minute and the installation of a new 1500 gpm hydrant at the corner of 30th Street and Pacific Coast Highway. California Water Company advised that they could not guarantee the required flows to the hydrants at this time; however, they have several projects planned for the area in the coming year which will raise the flows. These projects include the installation of new 12" water main and new pump stations to service the area. Staff feels it more prudent to delay the required installation and upgrade until the Water Company projects are completed so that part of the costs of the upgrades will be borne by the Water Company and the work will not have to be done twice. Vasek Polak BMW is expecting to complete their project soon and would like to have the project inspected and signed off. Because the fire flow upgrades will not be completed by that time, Mr. Polak has indicated that he would sign an agreement to fund the upgrades when they can be done. This would allow him to finish his project and would insure that the hydrants would be installed and upgraded as required at no cost to the City. CONCU': Kevin B. Northc aft, City Manager ectful yjmitted, E., • • Steve S. Wisniewski Director of Public Safety lg When Recorded return to: City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA. 90254 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made entered into between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and VASEK POLAK,BMW hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer desires to develop a tract of land decribed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and commonly known as at 2901 Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach, California, in accordance with a general planof site development heretofore submitted to and approved by the City (hereinafter called the "Development"); WHEREAS, due to increased fire flow requirements brought about as a direct result of the Development, approval of Development was conditioned upon an upgrade of the area's hydrant systems; WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into this Agreement in satisfaction of said condition: NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:: One: INSTALLATION AND UPGRADE OF HYDRANTS. (A) At no cost to the City, Developer agrees to pay for the (1) the upgrade of the fire hydrant located in the 2800 block of Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach, California, to a minimum of 1500 gallons per minute; and (2) the installation of a new hydrant with a minimum of 1500 gallons per minute at the corner of 30th Street and Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach, CalifornL a . (B) Upon completio! of the upgrade apd improvements by the City, the City shall giva written notice o Developer, and full payment shall be due within 30 days from receipt of said notice. 1. (C) Upon completion of upgrade and improvements, and payment of all sums owed by Developer, the City shall be responsible for the maintenance and operation of said hydrants. Two: SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. (A) This Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the City and Developer. Three: BREACH OF AGREEMENT (A) Should Developer breach this agreement, monies owed City shall become a lien upon Developer's property. (B) If suit by City against Developer shall be necessary to enforce this Agreement, Owner agrees that the court may add to any judgement secured in favor of City a reasonable amount to reimburse City for its attorneys' fees in connection with said suit. In witness whereof, the parties have caused this instrument to be executed on the date above written by their duly authorized officers. Subscribed and swore to before me the day of , 1989 VASEK POLAK, BMW By Notary Public Vasek Polak, President ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 2. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By Mayor .-9 October 23, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 14, 1989 REQUEST FOR HANDICAPPED PARKING STALL FOR RESIDENT AT 1253 TWENTY-FIRST STREET Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council of Hermosa Beach authorize the Mayor to sign the attached resolution which creates a handicapped parking stall at 1253 Twenty -First Street as described in the attached resolution. Background: On October 18, 1989, the Public Works Department received a request from George Zavislan, 1253 Twenty -First Street, Hermosa Beach for a handicapped parking stall. He submitted to the department his certificate of disability placard (Original in Public Works Department) #L105906 as outlined in the California Vehicle Code, Section 9105. Analysis: In June, 1989, City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-5277 which pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 22511.7 permits the City to establish handicapped parking stalls for disabled persons. The applicants request falls within the jurisdiction and may be granted by the aforementioned provisions of the vehicle code and Hermosa Beach resolution. There is no charge for a handicap zone. Mr. Zavislan, has a cardiovascular disease that significantly limits the use of his lower extremities. The stall would allow him to park in front of his home. There are no parking meters in this area, therefore, there will be no loss of revenue. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Deny the request Respectfully submitted, C i ary -atop An " y Antich Engineering Technician Director of Publ c Works Concur: evin B. Northc City Manager ty/hps Th 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 89-5263 BY ADDING THERETO AN ADDITIONAL CURBSIDE PARKING STALL AND SPACE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF DISABLED PERSONS, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 22511.7 AND 22511.8 OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE, AS HEREIN SET FORTH, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1253 TWENTY-FIRST STREET. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to Sections 22511.7 and 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code, Resolution No. 89-5263 is hereby amended by adding the following area as established curbside parking stall and space and designated as tow -away, pursuant to the California Vehicle Code. INGLESIDE DRIVE - First parking space west of Harper Avenue on the north side of Twenty -First Street in front of 1253 Twenty -First Street. SECTION 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 1989. ATTEST: APPROVED AS ty/resohps PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ,CITY CLERK TO FORM: ,CITY ATTORNEY November 2, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Regular Meeting of Members of the City Council November 14, 1989 APPROVAL OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, USER FEE STUDY/COST ALLOCATION PLAN Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the Request For Proposals (RFP) for a user fee study/cost allocation plan. Background In April 1984, Management Services Institute presented a fee study to the City Council identifying 80 service centers with associated revenue. In July of 1984, the City Council adopted Ordinance 84-762 setting forth a schedule for fifty-two of the fees and charges and the percentage of costs to be recovered on each. The previous study included software that was intended to be used for updating costs of services, however, it was not used due to the complexity of the system and the manpower requirements. The additional revenue due to fee adjustments for the 1984-85 year was recently estimated by staff to be over $500,000, primarily due to adjustments in building inspection fees, plan checking fees, and parking fines. Revenue for subsequent years was not analyzed, but the impact would have been fairly constant once fees were adjusted. Analysis The City Council approved $30,000 for the user fee study in the 1988-89 Budget. The RFP was not issued in 88-89 so the amount was reappropriated by Council to the 1989-90 Budget on September 12, 1989. The amount is an estimate and staff anticipates that a suitable proposal may possibly be obtained for less. It is imperative that the City obtain information regarding the full cost of delivering services that benefit only certain users. Otherwise, certain services may be unintenionally subsidized by tax dollars that should be spent for the benefit of the general public rather than individual users. Staff does not expect the user fee adjustment to be of the same magnitude as in 1984-85. However, since the initial study was done in 1984, the consumer price index has risen 24%, so it is safe to assume that the cost of services has also increased. The user fee study will calculate the full cost of providing user fee related services . Direct costs, such as staff time and materials, and indirect costs such as support services from staff departments and office and equipment costs will be included. These costs are then compared with the revenue received for the services. Based on this information, fees can then be adjusted if necessary. All existing fees will be included in the study. 1 a Several departments have also identified new fees that can be implemented once the full cost of providing the service is known. The consultant will work with departments to ensure that all services and corresponding fees are identified and that the methodology for the study is understood and accepted. The RFP requests that proposals include a method of updating the fees periodically that can be accomplished with a minimum of legislative and administrative burden. Since the study will take at least three months to complete, the City would not expect to update costs in this manner every year. A method should be established that allows fees to keep pace with the rise in the cost of delivering the service without undue burden and expense in calculating those costs each year. Concur: yam% evin B. Northcraft Viki Copeland Finance Director City Manager " Date CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS USER FEE STUDY/COST ALLOCATION PLAN Objectives The City of Hermosa Beach is seeking proposals for an analysis of fees and charges. All existing user fees plus new fees deemed appropriate will be included in the review. The analysis is to include: - determination of the full cost of services provided by the City - a review of existing fees and charges - identification and development of new user fees where applicable to recover costs - preparation of a cost allocation plan to allow recovery from enterprise funds and grant programs. The City is interested in determining the full cost of services so that fees may be set at an appropriate level and in adopting a method of adjusting fees annually that is not an undue legislative/administrative burden. Background The City of Hermosa Beach has an area of 1.3 square miles and a population of 19,764 as of January 1, 1989. The City has a Council -Manager form of government with eight operating departments as shown on the attached organizational chart. The City's budget for 1989-90 is $15.7 million including $3.3 in Capital Improvements. There are 171 full time and 77 part-time personnel. Service charges of $1.2 million comprise 8% of the overall revenue of $15.2 million. There are approximately 60 individual service charges. The City's computer system is a Hewlett Packard 3000 Series 48. Software for the financial management system was developed by InfoComp Systems, Inc. The General Ledger is organized by fund, with an account structure comprised of class, department/division and object. A user fee study was conducted for the City in April of 1984. the report were adopted by the costs to be recovered for each have been updated sporadically administrative constraints. by Management Services Institute The majority of fees included in City Council. The percentage of fee was also established. Fees on an individual basis due to Timing Requirements The City would like to complete the study within three months so that any user fee adjustments could be included in the 1990-91 budget deliberations beginning in April. Selection Criteria Proposals will be evaluated on the following criteria: - understanding of the engagement - acceptability of approach and work plan hours and timeline to complete task qualifications of firm and assigned staff - cost of engagement Contents of Proposal Proposals should contain the following information in the order shown below to facilitate comparison between bidders. 1. Introduction/Summary of Proposal 2. Qualifications of firm and individuals to be assigned to this project, with the lead person clearly identified. Include resumes for each individual and number of hours expected to work on project. 3. Description of recent, similar work for other cities in California. Include three personal references with contact information and a complete client list for this type of study. 4. Methodology to be used and detailed work plan. Include specifics regarding amount and timing of City staff involvement. Please include samples of like reports prepared for other cities (may be attached separately). 5. Fees for services, including a not to exceed limit. 6. Number of copies of final product and meetings/ presentations included in fee. Submission of Proposal Please submit two copies of the proposal by to: Viki Copeland, Finance Director City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 318-0225 Mayor and Members of the City Council CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES November 7, 1989 City Council Meeting November 14, 1989 The following claim(s) have been submitted to the City Clerk's office: Sunstone Music - c/o the Law Offices of Peter R. Dionato, 8421 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 205, Beverly Hills, CA 90201, filed October 17, 1989; alleged unlawful Breach of Contract. Dama Claire Strizak - 408 Ocean View #B, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, filed October 17, 1989; alleged auto accident resulting from alleged mnegligent� maintenance of tree. Hans Joachim Schreier - 853 S. Bedford Street #4, Los Angeles, CA 90035, filed October 2, 1989; alleged auto damage from fire hydrant. Recommendation: To deny claim(s) and refer to City's Claims Administrator. Note: The above claim(s) are available for review in the office of the City Clerk. Concur: EVIN B. NORTHCRAF , City Manager 11,1/1€;‘,I.,/ ND RIDDLE, , Deputy City Clerk 1 1 MAIL TO: CLAIM NO.: gc,,-10 —/ LIABILITY DEPARTMENT CODE: Z 2 ) CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PRO City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 1. Claims for death, injury to persons, or to personal property. (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. COPIES TO: ro.z (04 elipi?riAl US OWL l/ a EEC% OCT 21969 must be filed not later than six (6) mo MI COSI, d Me FEMME 1111111111 iter the occurren than one (1) year after the occurrence (Go Namoolcumul l Sehv�ejev' l a s t r,, I i r s t, m i a a i e)Age Navts oe1 C lot V \ 9 3 Home Address of Claimant (Street City, State, Zip)j 85 d c • -gQo<d S}. Le _ _ 14vt Qter �C_/ ql �©035 Telephone No. (z.)&cpsq-1Iuk Business Address of Claimant Or t, City, State, Zip) ` ---- G S ca eV Q '-- Telephone No. ( ) Address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: Date of Oamage/Loss/lnjuryTime P . . 2—CC I e 89 ie. 1° A.M. P.M. Place of Damage/Loss/Injury 2 tl i • 54 , c -• Cov nem 4 0t M ' Ids 1. %rya g• `.Th eLi ICS 1 . , How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific) `� (.-1 4 i 1 M .•� - e1� re= Ls S ► Lin/ A �, � • _LAM i/1.$ 4. del. \ Were Plblice at scene? Yes 0 No Were Paramedics at scene? Yes 0 Nom' Report No. What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damage/loss/injury? ri1-'`c-.. Qw-N(2) C 1i cAc� -Qk • Si - .1 '�nn Q `� Name of City employee(s) causing he damage/loss/injury: g„ J 40M S s et_cL Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimatedmount of a 1 .. ,ems less than $10,000.00 If so, state the amount •_ M' prospjtive injury, damage, or Toss: • 0 more than $25,000.00 (Superior Court Jurisdiction) 1 O more than $10,000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction) How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctorbills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estimates. • 7 • ;�. • • : e IP 0 .iz-C a C IP Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and Item). THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. fir•. CLAIM NO.: 89 10-2 LIABILITY DEPARTMENT CODE: 410/ CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROPERTY MAIL TO: City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 COPIES TO: f(u), CeStjja 1. Claims for death, injury to persons, or to personal property, must be filed not later t (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than one (1) year 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. fter the occurrence 'Gr 11 e, Sec.911.2). Name of Claimant (last, first, middle) - r9• Strizak, Dama, Claire S �el Age " 34 . Home Address of Claimant (Street. City, State. Trp) D� 408 Ocean View #B Hermosa Beach, CA 1 elephone No. 1213)318-5525 Business Address of Claimant (Street, City, State, Zip) 16835 Algonquin #136 Huntington Beach, CA 9 ... N Telephone No. (213)318-5525 Address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: 408 Ocean View #B Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Date of Oamage/Lossnnjury ---.1.1,11.31,41-.4.6_,_144.51 TIme AM. 1-04-110---1 P.M. Place of Dainage/Loesilnjury 4 8 r1 Vi Ates HarmLLSa 1 isa nh . .AAII How did damage/oss/in jury occur? (Be specific) A h r a n e h f r o m A e i t r n wn.Bd t r a ct s_tr ii r•_k my windshield and caused my vehicle to swerve and strike the side of my building. • r s Were Police at scene? Yes g] NoO Were Paramedics at scene? Yes 0 Nott Report No. 8 9 -2 664 What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damage/loss/injury? N e g l i e n t maintenance _of tree Name of City employee(s) causing the damagefoss/injury: Unknown • Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, O less than 510,000.00 If so, state the amount $ 2,519 7 7 0 more than $25,000.00 damage, or loss: (Superior Court Jurisdiction) O more than $10.000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction) How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. Ust doctor bills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estimates. Doctor bills; $452.40., car repair; $1,830.07, car rental; $237.30 All amount are actual. • Expenditures made because of damage/Ioss/injury (Date and Item). 6/23/89 Car repair $1830- 07. 6/23/89 Enterprise car rental $132.30, 6/18/899 Hospital bill $166.45, 'ld d4....1 l,i 11 .. ga.no An D1,a......... 1,411. %/1 Q /QO t7 Of; THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. CLAIM NO.: LIABILITY DEPARTMENT CODE: CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROPERTY MAIL TO: City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive IHermosa Beach, CA 90254 COPIES TO: LAW OFFICE OF PETER R. DIDONATO 8421 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 205 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 1. Claims for death, injury to persons, or to personal property, must be filed not later t (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than one (1) year 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. the after the occurrence ce Code, Sec.911.2). Name of aaimard t l a s t, r l "' 1 Age N/A i r s t, xn i a a i e r '`• r - o THE LAW OFFICES OF PETER R. •1 D,!,i 4, in"... ...9Q 89 s, Home Address of Claimant (Street. City. State, Zip)snwousiwoTelephone 8421 Wilshire Blvd Ste. 205 Beverl Hills CA/* 0211 No. (213)651-1617 Business Address of Claimant (Street. qty. State, Zip) _ •o il Telephone No. ( ) N Address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: Same as above Date of Damage/Loss/Injury May 26 thro 28 1989 Time A.M. P.M. Place of Damage/Loss/Injury Hermosa Beach C'vic Theater s c h e d u l ed events by How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific) Due to cancel 1 a t i on of the City of Hermosa Beach. if Were Police at scene? Yew RN NoO 3 ti me s Were Paramedics at scene? Yes 0 No®( Report No. Unknown What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damageAoss/injury? The City of Hermosa Beach unlawfully breached its contract with claimant. Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: Terri Edi son , R e c r e a t i on S p e c i al i s t Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, O Tess than $10,000.00 If so, state the amount xi more than $25,000.00 damage, or loss: (Superior Court Jurisdiction) O more than $10,000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction) How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor bills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estimates. Loss of profits: out -of -Docket expenses; and damage to refutation. Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and Item). THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. November 2, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council November 14, 1989 APPROVAL OF DESIGN OF ENTRY SIGNS TO THE CITY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission the City Council approve the attached design for entry signs to the City and direct staff to prepare a bid package. BACKGROUND The Commission has been working on this project for several months. During this time period they have reviewed many designs and color schemes and reviewed the various locations via slides and photographs. ANALYSIS CIP 89-612, City Entry Signs has an approved funding level of $16,700. The slide presentation that will be presented at the Council Meeting will show all the locations considered by the Commission as sites for the new signs. Upon receiving responses from the various bidders, and subject to budget appropriations, the Commission would then recommend to the Council the best locations for the installations of the signs. All of the locations under consideration at the moment are: Prospect at 1st. Place * Manhattan Ave. at 35th. Ardmore at Longfellow Aviation at PCH* Both ends of the Strand Wall Hermosa Ave. at Herondo* Valley Drive at Longfellow* PCH at Gould PCH at 1st. St.* *Denotes entry sign already there. DESIGN The sign shall be either a monument sign to be installed in the ground or a metal sign to be attached to a pole. The monument sign shall be constructed of concrete, poured in a form that is set level and flat. Copy for the name of the city will be cut out of gator foam, and set on face of form and poured over, so the name will be inset in the concrete. The logo will be in concrete also and the lettering will be a more modified script and not as depicted on the attached color rendering. The size of the monument sign shall be 4' x 7' x 8" thick. lm The pole signs shall be a treated metal ( to withstand the salt air) and shall be the same design and color as the monument sign. The size shall be 18" x 3' x 6". The existing monument signs shall be retained. The bricks will be treated and painted according to the new color scheme and the actual face of the sign shall be redone to match the new design. While surveying the City it is very apparent there is no semblance of uniform signage within the City. The various City signs are in different colors, different style print and different sizes. Part of the slide presentation will show some of the various signs throughout the City. Respectfully submitted, Alana Mastrian-Handman Director Dept. of Community Resources Concur: Ifevin B. orthc'aft City Manager ""1.. .1. --- -- -- '''_•,_ 7.,,....„,„.,,:_--,.c.....„ ._. -7 ........, ............i....„..,.., '?i,....",..G.-47.4.', '' .4 ..• :,..,.„;.,..-g.z,.!j,,,,... :::.:....; ,,,,s : November 6, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council November 14, 1989 REQUEST FROM THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REGARDING HOLIDAY ACTIVITIES Recommendation: That the City Council approve: (1) the attached annual request from the Chamber of Commerce to (a) bag all the silver post meters in the Vehicle Parking district to allow three hours free parking, (bags are purchased by the Chamber) from December 1, 1989 until January 1, 1990. (b) authorize the closure of the north side of Pier Avenue, from Hermosa Avenue to Beach Drive, on Tuesday, December 5, 1989 between the hours of 5:00 pm and 6:30 pm, with enough barricades provided to block off both ends of Pier Avenue, for the Holiday Lighting Ceremonies, and; (2) bagging of all commercial meters. Background: The Chamber of Commerce has made this now traditional request of the Council for many years, in order to promote increased patronage of businesses in the community, and citizen participation in the activities. The Council has also in the past, approved the bagging of all the commercial meters. Analysis: The City Council has traditionally granted this request. If approved, the City will purchase from the Chamber of Commerce, at a cost of approximately eighty (80) dollars, the bags necessary to cover the additional 500 meters. Alternatives: (1) Authorize either bagging of all the meters or closure of the streets. 1 (2) Authorize the bagging of only those meters in the VPD as requested by the Chamber and closure of the streets. (3) Deny this request. CONCUR: Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Kevin B. Northc•faft, City Manager Respectfully submitted, Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Director by hzeigi21), Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide Director 2 NOTED for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 October 17, 1989 Mayor June Williams and City Council Members City Hall/Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Honorable Mayor & Council Members: The Christmas season is fast approaching and the Chamber of Commerce is planning an event to make this a most enjoyable holiday season. To spread holiday cheer throughout the downtown area and make shopping more convienient, we would like to request that all silver posted meters in the VPD district be bagged from December 1, until January 1, 1990. We also request that three hour free parking be allowed. This year once again, we are planning to have our annual Christmas Mixer and lighting ceremonies together as one event on Tuesday, December 5, 1989. The festivities will start at 5:00 and consist of an opening prayer, caroling and the official lighting ceremonies. This will be followed by our Holiday Mixer at the Bank of America. We are hoping the Mayor will be available on that evening to officially light up the City for the holiday season! We will need permission from the City Council to close the north side of Pier Ave, from Hermosa Ave. to Beach Dr. on the above date between the hours of 5:00 and 6:30. We will also need enough barricades to block off both ends of Pier Ave. We look forward to your favorable consideration of the above plan. Cordially, Wesley D. Bush Executive Vice President cc: Tony Antich Joan Noon 1 MEN 11111 smitossise. _ ®®. � mimir QM. dIMMIIMIMP IMIMEMENI 11635111511. a®r 1 IIIIIMM November 6, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council November 14, 1989 REQUEST TO TRANSFER $15,100 AND AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF 220 PARKING METERS FROM DUNCAN INDUSTRIES Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize: (1) appropriation of funds in the amount of $15,100.00 from the the Parking Fund, (2) to purchase (220) Duncan Industries meters, to replace a portion of the POM, Incorporated meters, from existing appropriations and the above approved funds, and (3) purchase of these meters from Duncan without a formalized notice of bids process, to take advantage of the heavily discounted price, and in recognition of the fact that the only two existing vendors have submitted bids. Background: Currently, the city has approximately 1600 meters throughout the city, manufactured by either POM, Incorporated, or Duncan Industries. A little more than half these meters are POM manufactured. There has been a recurring and widespread vandalism problem with the POM meters, allowing for time to be credited on the meter, up to the maximum, with out depositing coins. Although POM does offer a safeguard meter similar to Duncan, its cost is almost double the price offered by Duncan. Analysis: Duncan, in a one time only offer, is offering the meters at approximately half -cost. It was unforeseeable that this offer would be forthcoming, when the monies were originally budgeted for this fiscal year. These two companies are the only known manufacturers of parking meters in the world. The vandalism problem with POM meters has resulted in not only a loss in revenue, but a cost in man-hours repairing the vandalized meters. A jammed meter prevents the deposit of coins, and thereby creates the potential of receiving a parking violation for an expired meter. The Duncan meters have a safeguard mechanism, that prevents such vandalism, and is thereby a more cost effective meter. Eventually, all the POM meters are planned to be replaced, in order to maintain cost effectiveness. 1 At this time, we are asking to replace only those meters in certain problem areas. These areas are high volume use areas, and represent the greatest losses in revenue and man-hours. Alternatives: (1) Purchase the replacement meters, when budgeted in the next fiscal year, at twice the cost. (2) Avoid replacement of the meters, allowing for a loss in revenue, and increased man-hours to effect repairs. (3) Transfer enough monies to completely replace all POM meters. CONCUR: AAtf enr,y L. Staten, Acting General Services Director Respectfully submitted, Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Director evin B. North,6aft, City Manager 2 by Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide NOTED for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Duncan Industries PARKING CONTROL SYSTEMS 4207 WILLIMET AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90039 (213) 245-6778 October 5,Z989 Ms. Joan Noon General Services Director City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Ms. Noon: As per our conversation today, we are pleased to quote the following special One -Time Promotion Pricing•on VIP 70 Single Vaults, Housings and Complete. Meters: Model 70 Single Lower Vault only $60.00 each Zinc Mech Housing -Remanufactured $15.00 -each Total VIP 70 housing complete $75.00 each Above housings would be equipped with standard DE locks without coin boxes. Since you use the standryrd DE locks these would be included in the price, however, you would have to add $16.25 for the sealed coin boxes, if you desire to have them furnished with coin boxes. Complete Model 70 Single meter with remanufactured mechanisms in the following quantities: Z-100 $115.00 each 10Z-500 $110.00 each 501 -Plus $106.00 each Again these would include locks but not coin boxes - add $16.25 for the sealed coin boxes. The above units carry a full three. (3) year warranty. The units are on a first-come, first-served basis.to all. AZ/ orders must be in no .later than December 31,2989. At this time, we are projecting shipment of orders within 30-45 days after receipt of order. CORPORATE OFFICE: SUITE 100, 2055 ARMY TRAIL ROAD, ADDISON, ILLINOIS 60101 POM INCORPORATED 200 South Elmira Ave. P.O. Box 430 Ruuel lie AR 72801. USA Telephone 5011682880 Teles -536.272 POM RSVL Cable—POMINC FAX -501.968-2840 October 17, 1989 Mr. Richard Contreras CIty of Hermosa Beach Parking Meter Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 - RE: PRICING FOR POM MODEL "E" PARKING METERS Dear Richard: Per your request I have listed below the pricing we discussed via phone on 10/16/89. Description Price 11Iode1 "E" Zinc/Iron Complete Meter with Sealed Collection System $173.45 As we discussed, we will give you $10.00 each for the trade in of your Model "S" meters which would make your actual price with trade in for the above listed meters $163.45. If you have additional questions, please feel free to call us toll-free at 1/800/331-7275. Note also, that this price is quoted F.O.B. Hermosa Beach. Regards, jaill-ei- Deronda Sanders District Sales Manager Recipient of The Presidential E -Star Award for Excellence in Exporting ti November 7, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Member City Council Meeting of of the City Council November 14, 1989 RECEIVE AND FILE PARKING STUDY AS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the attached parking study. Background: At their regularly scheduled meeting of October 24, 1989, the City Council directed staff to provide them with the parking studies done by the City on parking structures. Analysis: Attached for your review, are copies of the studies done over the past five years. (1) A report from Economic Research Associates, dated December 30, 1986, which is an economic feasibility study on placing a parking structure in the vicinity of the Community Center. In this report, are recommendations for locations and possible financing mechanisms, as well as possible projected revenue generation. ERA prepared two alternative parking facility concepts, the principal difference being the amount of land area used. Alternative A uses the llth Place property and adjacent surface parking lot. An estimated 390 spaces are provided at a total cost of $3.2 million ($7,200 per space). Alternative B yields a greater number of parking spaces at a lower unit cost than Alternative A due to the absence of subterranean construction. The resulting annual debt service is approximately $327;000 for Alternative A, and $309,000 for Alternative B, indicating the need for a first-year Parking Fund subsidy of between $154,000 (Alternative A) to $136,000 (Alternative B). (2) The study done by Ridgemont Parking Systems (RPS), presented to the Vehicle Parking District Commissioners at their meeting of January 13, 1987, addresses the feasibility of a parking structure in the downtown area. The report introduced "parking privatization" as a vehicle toward realization of a parking structure. Ridgemont Parking Systems proposes to manage by contract, three sites owned by the Vehicle Parking District. In doing so, RPS will finance, construct, and operate a three level, 450 -car parking garage on lot C. Additionally RPS will upgrade and operate parking lots A and B. The contract will be in the form of a lease agreement, with RPS paying $100 per year base rent, and a percentage of the gross lij revenues after the fourth year. They additionally request a percentage of all citations issued on the three lots. Title to the parking garage and improvements to be in the name of the Lessee, until expiration of the lease, at which time the title shall be surrendered to the City, lien free. Respectfully submitted, Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Director CONCUR: 4 y ,1- Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services City Manager Director by Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide NOTE: The studies are voluminous so were not copied for all packets, but are available for review in the City Clerk's office. October 30, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of November 14, 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE DISPOSAL OF THE LADDER TRUCK DONATED TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the disposal of the ladder truck. BACKGROUND: In March 1987, Council accepted the donation of a 1959 Mercedes ladder truck from Vasek Polak. Mr. Polak purchased the truck in Germany and had it shipped to Hermosa Beach in order to donate it to the Fire Department for possible use in fire fighting. ANALYSIS: Prior to authorizing the use of, and training on the truck, it was deemed advi- sable to have the required OSHA and NFPA safety inspections performed. Equipment Testing Company of San Bernardino was contracted to conduct the required testing of the ladder truck. The testing revealed that the truck did not meet several of the required safety specifications. Two of the more critical requirements which the truck failed to meet were the horizontal load test and the maximum elevation load test. In these tests, the ladder of the truck is extended fully and a weight is attached to the end of the ladder. Safety standards call for the weight to be fully suspended with no drop for a full five (5) minutes. The truck failed both tests by dropping the weight approximately 5 inches in approximately 2 minutes. This failure indicates that the hydralics of the truck and ladder system need to be completely overhauled in order to meet the safety standards. There were several other standards that the truck did not meet and there were many items that need repair before the truck could be pass the safety inspec- tions and be utilized. The potential costs associated with bringing the truck up to the safety stan- dards coupled with the fact that the Hermosa Beach Fire Department does not have the staff to operate the ladder truck along with a fire engine at a fire scene leads staff to recommend that the ladder truck be disposed of. 1 lq The donor, Vasek Polak, was contacted regarding the recommendation to dispose of the ladder truck. Mr. Polak indicated that he felt we should dispose of the truck in the manner which is of the greatest benefit to the City. Staff has considered keeping the truck and using it for parades and other spe- cial events; however, the truck is taking up valuable space in the station which could be better utilized for other department equipment which needs to be stored inside. Based on all of the considerations, It is staff recommendation that the truck be sold at auction and the proceeds utilized to help offset the cost purchase of the new•fire engine. CONCUR: Kevin B. Northcrafi', City ;Manager 2 Resygctfully Submitted, Steve S. Wisniewski Director of Public Safety November 1, 1989 Honorable Mayor and City Council Meeting Members of the City Council of November 14, 1989 ADOPTION OF THE 1988 EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS, UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE AND THE 1987 EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. RECOMMENNDATION It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and introduce the attached ordinance for adoption. Analysis The adoption of the referenced codes will update the City's building regulations to be in conformance with state law. As a general law city, Hermosa Beach is required to enforce the codes adopted by the state, although amendments for administration and local conditions can be made. The State of California Building Standards Commission has adopted the 1988 editions of the various uniform codes creating a deadline for local adoption of January 1, 1990. Should the City not take any action to adopt the 1988 codes (with amendments), the codes as adopted by the state would be governing regulations as of January 1, 1990. The National Electric Code is on a different three year cycle than the "Uniform Codes". Adoption of the 1987 edition will conform to action taken at the state level. Detailed changes to the uniform codes from the 1985 editions may be determined by reviewing the 71 page document entitled "1988 Analysis of Revisions to the Uniform Building Code (and related codes)" published by the International Conference of Building Officials on file in the City Clerks office. Some examples of Uniform Building Code revisions include the following: 1. Significant revisions to the requirements for Group (hazardous) occupancies to correlate with provisions of Uniform Fire Code. "H" the 2. Requirement for all dwellings in the same structure to be separated by a minimum of one-hour fire -resistive construction. 3. Requirement for an emergency escape window or door from the basements of dwelling units. 4. Expanded requirement for smoke detectors in basements of dwellings. - 1 - 5a 5. Complete revision to the seismic design provisions. The changes incorporate advances in seismic design since the last major revision in this area which occurred in the 1976 edition of the code. The changes were developed by the Seismology Committee of the Structural Engineers Association of California. 6. Complete revision to the provisions for reinforced concrete design to conform to American Concrete Institute Standard 318. 7. Revision to allow one exit from the third floor within an individual dwelling unit when the third floor does not exceed 500 sq. ft. Additonal local amendments are proposed to be consistent with previous amendments relating to administration, fire -retardant roofing and skylights, use of nonmettalic sheathed cable and permit fees. In addition, significant local amendments are proposed to the regulations for automatic fire -extinguishing systems. The provisions are consistent with the revisions proposed by the Fire Department for the Uniform Fire Code. The proposed revisions would require fire sprinklers to be installed in drinking and dining establishments and retail stores where the floor area exceeded 3500 square feet. All apartment buildings and hotels exceeding 5000 square feet would also require the installation of fire sprinklers. The staff report pertaining to adoption of the Uniform Fire Code, with amendments, should be reviewed for justification to revising the automatic fire -extinguishing system requirements. Numerous sections of the Electrical Chapter have been deleted as the subject matter is now adequately addressed in the National Electric Code with Uniform Administrative Code provisions. ALTERNATIVES 1. Adopt the Uniform Codes without the local amendments. Respectfully Submitted William Grove Concur: .,tib Concur: ��—` �a-� '` Steve Wisniewski Kevin B. Northcraft Public Safety Director City Manager hull/ccsrbldg 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 89 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 7, ARTICLES I,II, III, IV, AND CHAPTER 11 AND CHAPTER 24 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO BUILDING, PLUMBING AND ELECTRIC REGULATIONS AND ADOPTING WITH CERTAIN ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND AMENDMENTS, WHICH ARE SET FORTH HEREIN, THE RULES, REGULATIONS, PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THOSE CERTAIN CODES ENTITLED, "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1988 EDITION", "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS, 1988 EDITION" , "UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, 1988 EDITION", AND "UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, 1988 EDITION", PROMULGATED AND PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS AND THE "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, 1988 EDITION" AND "UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, 1988 EDITION" PROMULGATED AND PUBLISHED JOINTLY BY THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS AND "NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE, 1987 EDITION" PROMULGATED AND PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the 1988 editions of the Uniform Codes and 1987 edition of the National Electric Code have been adopted by the State of California Building Standards Commission, with amendments, to represent the construction regulations for all structures within California; and WHEREAS, local amendments may be made to those codes to address local needs; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that local climactic conditions and congestion require amendments to further promote fire safety by eliminating combustible roofing and expanding the requirements for automatic fire -extinguishing systems. NOW, THEREFOR, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Chapter 7, Article I of the City Code of the City of Hermosa Beach is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 7-1. Adoption of Uniform Building Code and Standards. Pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code of the State of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 California, those certain codes designated as the "Uniform Building Code, 1988 Edition" including appendix excepting chapters 7, 12, 23, 26 and 53 of said appendix and the "Uniform Building Code Standards, 1988 Edition" published by the International Conference of Building Officials, one (1) copy of which is on file in the office of the city clerk for public record and inspection, are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of this chapter as though set forth in this chapter in full, subject, however, to the amendments, additions and deletions set forth in this chapter and by the State of California, Building Standards Commission and said codes shall comprise the building code for the City of Hermosa Beach. Whenever the word "jurisdiction" appears in said codes, it shall mean and refer to the City of Hermosa Beach. Whenever the term "building official" appears in said building code it shall mean and refer to the Director of Building and Safety of the City of Hermosa Beach." SECTION 2. That Section 7-1.1. is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 7-1.1. Board of Appeals Section 204 of said building code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 204. (a) General. In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building official relative to the application and interpretation of this code, there shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 consisting of five (5) members who are qualified by experience and training to pass upon matters pertaining to building construction and who are not employees of the jurisdiction. The building official shall be an ex officio member of and shall act as secretary to said board but shall have no vote upon any matter before the board. The Board of Appeals shall be appointed by the governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure. The board shall adopt rules procedure for conducting its business and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the appellant with a duplicate copy to the building official. (b) Limitations of Authority. The Board of appeals shall have no authority relative to interpretation of the administrative provisions of this code nor shall the Board be empowered to waive requirements of this code. Three (3) members of said board shall constitute a quorum. The board shall elect one of its members to act as chairman. At least three (3) day's notice of the meetings of said board shall be given to each member personally, or by registered mail; provided, however, that any meeting of said board shall be legal for any purpose if the written consent of all members of said board to such meeting is executed and filed in the records of such board. Such board shall have the right, subject to such limits as the council may prescribe by resolution, to employ at the cost and expense of said city such practicing architects, competent builders, attorneys and structural engineers as said board in its 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 discretion may deem reasonable and necessary to assist in its investigation and in making its findings and decisions". SECTION 3. That Section 7-1.2. is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 7-1.2. Violations. Section 205 of said building code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec 205. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building or structure or cause or permit the same to be done in violation of this code. Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter or said building code shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable as set forth in Chapter 1, section 1-7 of the Hermosa Beach City Code." SECTION 4. That Section 7-12.3.is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 7-1.3. Fees. Section 304 of said building is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 304. (a) General. Fees shall be assessed in accordance with the provisions of this section. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (b) Permit fees. The fee for each permit shall be as set forth in the most recent executive order issued pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 2, Article XIII of the City Code. The determination of value or valuation under any of the provisions of this code shall be made by the building official. Where work for which a permit is required by this code is started or proceeded with prior to obtaining said permit, the fees above specified shall be quadrupled, but the payment of such quadrupled fee shall not relieve any persons from fully complying with the requirements of this code in the execution of the work nor from any other penalties prescribed herein. (c) Plan Review Fees. When a plan or other data are required to be submitted by Subsection (b) of Section 302, a plan review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting plans and specifications for review. Said plan review fee shall be 65 percent of the building permit fee. The plan review fees specified in this subsection are separate fees from the permit fees specified in Section 304 (a) and are in addition to the permit fees. Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require additional plan review, an additional plan review fee shall be charged at the rate indicated in the executive order. (d) Expiration of Plan Review. Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon request by the applicant showing that circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented action from being taken. No application shall be extended more than once. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee. (e) Fee Refunds. 1. The building official may authorize the refunding of any fee paid hereunder which was erroneously paid or collected. 2. The building official may authorize the refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this code. 3. The building official may authorize the refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is done. The building official shall not authorize the refunding of any fee paid except upon written application filed by the original permittee not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. (f) Special inspections for change of occupancy or tenancy. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (1) In order to safeguard life, limb, health, property and public welfare, every commercial and industrial building, structure or portion thereof shall conform to the requirements for the occupancy to be housed therein, or for the use to which the building, structure or portion thereof is to be put, as set forth in the building, plumbing, electrical and fire prevention codes of the city for the proposed occupancy, that portion shall be made to conform. (2) Each change of occupancy or tenancy of any commercial or industrial building, structure or portion thereof shall require an inspection to be made by the building and fire departments. If a portion of any building or structure does not conform to the requirements of the building , plumbing, electrical and fire prevention codes of the City for the proposed occupancy, that portion shall be made to conform. (3) Before any commercial or industrial building or structure may be occupied, there shall be approval from the Building and Fire Departments. (4) The Building and Fire Departments shall advise the owner or tenant of those alterations necessary to make the building comply, or, if none, approval shall be given. (5) The building official may allow occupancy of the building or structure without requiring complete compliance with all the requirements of the codes of the City, provided that such occupancy does not result in increased hazard to life, limb, health, property or public welfare. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (6) Before any inspections will be made by the Building or Fire Departments for such change of occupancy or tenancy, there shall be paid to the Building Department a fee as indicated in the executive order, to cover the cost of inspection of the building for which the change is desired. Such fee shall be in addition to the regular building permit fee required by the building code of the City". SECTION 5. That Section 7-1.8. is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 7-1.8. Moving Buildings. Section 302 of said building code is hereby amended by adding thereto the following subsection (e) to read as follows: (e) Moving Buildings. To obtain a permit to move a building into the City or to move any building or structure from one location within the City to another, the applicant shall, in addition to the information required in subsections, (a), (b), (c) and (d) hereof, furnish the following information: (1) The age of the building, which shall be verified by the Building Department in the City in which said building was erected. (2) Provide plot plan, which shall include precise new location of building in relation to property lines. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (3) Submit a floor plan of all floors of said building. Plan shall be drawn to scale of one-eighth inch or one-quarter inch equals one foot. (4) Furnish a sketch or plan showing the size and general (5) design of the building. Submit four (4) photographs, eight (8) inches by ten (10) inches in size, showing the front, rear and side views of the building, and three (3) photographs of the front and side views of the proposed location. After the applicant has filed such application, the building official of the city shall inspect said building for all necessary requirements and for the purpose of ascertaining whether structurally the same complies with this code, and having made such inspection, the building official shall make findings showing the result of such inspection and refer the same, together with the written application, sketches and photographs, to the Planning Commission of the City. The applicant shall then pay to the Planning Commission a review fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00). The Planning Commission shall hold hearings to be given to the applicant and to other interested persons in the neighborhood of the proposed location, such notice to be in form and time as may seem reasonable to the Planning Commission. After the hearing, the Planning Commission shall make its recommendations to the building official of the City, as to whether or not a permit shall be granted, and if the Planning Commission recommends that a permit be granted, then the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 building official shall file with the City Council the findings of the Planning Commission and all pertinent information relating to said application for its final approval. After final approval from the City Council, the building official shall require the applicant to file with the building official a bond equal to the amount of the estimated cost of placing such building on a foundation as required by this code, and preparing, altering or improving such structure to meet the requirements of this code and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the City Council. Such bond may be a cash bond in said amount or a surety bond, but, if a surety bond, it shall be in double the amount of the estimated cost, and the sureties thereon shall appear before the building official and satisfy him as to their financial worth and ability to pay to the City the amount of the bond in the event it is necessary for the City to bring action thereon. such bonds shall be payable to the City and shall be conditioned upon the construction and completion of the structure in compliance with this code and the requirements,of the planning commission and the City Council, and for the payment of materialmen and laborers, furnishing material and laborers for the rebuilding or completion of the structure, with foundation, as required by this code and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the City Council." SECTION 6. That Section 7-1.9. is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 7-1.9. Roof Covering Requirements 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 3203 of said building code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 3203. The roof covering on any structure regulated by this code shall be as specified in Table No. 32-A and as classified in Section 3204, except that the minimum roof covering assembly shall be a class "B" roofing assembly. The roof -covering assembly includes the roofdeck, underlayment, interlayment, insulation and covering which is assigned a roof -covering classification." SECTION 7. That Section 7-1.10 shall be amended to read as follows: "Section 3404 of said building code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 3404. All skylight frames shall be constructed of noncombustible materials. Skylights, the glazing of which is set at an angle of less than 45 degrees from the horizontal, shall be mounted at least 4 inches above the plane of the roof on a curb constructed as required for the frame. SECTION 8. That a new Section 7.1.11 is hereby added to read as follows: "Section 7.1.11. Fire Extinguishing Systems. Section 3802 (c) 1 of said building code is hereby amended to read as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (c) Group A Occupancies. 1.Drinking Establishments. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in rooms used by the occupants for the consumption of alcoholic beverages and unseparated accessory uses where the total area of such unseparated rooms and assembly uses exceeds 3,500 square feet. For uses to be considered as separated, the separation shall not be less than as required for a one-hour occupancy separation. The area of other uses shall be included unless separated by at least a one-hour separation. Section 3802 (c) 3 of said building code is hereby amended to read as follows: 3. Exhibition and display rooms. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in Group A Occupancies which have more than 3,500 square feet of floor area which can be used for exhibition or display purposes. Section 3802 (d) of said building code is hereby amended to read as follows: (d) Group B, Division 2 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in retail sales rooms classed as Group B, Division 2 Occupancies where the floor area exceeds 3,500 square feet on any floor or 5,000 square feet on all floors or in Group B, Division 2 retail sales occupancies more than one story in height. The area of mezzanines shall be included in determining the areas where sprinklers are required. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 3802 (h) of said building code is hereby amended to read as follows: (h) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every apartment house three or more stories in height or where the floor area exceeds 5,000 square feet, and every hotel three or more stories in height or where the floor area exceeds 5,000 square feet. Residential or quick -response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dwelling unit and guest room portions of the building. Table No. 38-A - Standpipe Requirements of said building code is hereby amended to substitute the term "3 stories" wherever the term "4 stories" appears in said table. SECTION 9. That a new Section 7.1.12 is hereby added to read as follows: "Section 7.1.11. Fire Alarm Systems. The first paragraph of Section 1211 shall be amended to read as follows: Section 1211. A manual and automatic approved fire alarm system shall be installed in apartment houses that are three or more stories in height or contain more than 15 dwelling units and in hotels three or more stories in height or containing 20 or more quest rooms, in accordance with the Fire Code. For the purposes of this section, lofts or mezzanines shall be considered as stories." 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 part of this chapter as though set forth in this chapter in full, subject, however, to the amendments, additions and deletions set forth in this chapter, and said code shall be known as the abatement of dangerous buildings code of this City. Whenever the term "jurisdiction" appears in said code it shall mean and refer to the City of Hermosa Beach. Whenever the term "building official" appears in said code it shall mean and refer to the Director of Building and Safety of the City of Hermosa Beach." SECTION 12. That Section 7-3.1. is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 7-3.1. Board of Appeals Section 205 of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 205. (a) General. In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building official relative to the application and interpretations of this code, there shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals consisting of members who are qualified by experience and training to pass upon matters pertaining to building construction and who are not employees of the jurisdiction. Said board shall be the same Board of Appeals specified in Section 204 of the Uniform Building Code as amended by Section 7.1.1. of this Code. The building official shall be an ex officio member and shall act as secretary to said board but shall have no vote upon any matter 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 before the board. The Board of Appeals shall be appointed by the governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure. The board shall adopt rules of procedure for conducting its business and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the appellant, with a duplicate copy to the building official. Appeals to the board shall be processed in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 501 of this code. Copies of all rules or regulations adopted by the board shall be delivered to the building official, who shall make the freely accessible to the public. (b) Limitations of Authority. The Board of Appeals shall have no authority relative to interpretation of the administrative provisions of this code nor shall the board be empowered to waive requirements of this code." SECTION 13. That Section 7-3.2 is hereby amended in part by replacing the first two paragraphs with the following: "The council, after due consideration, finds and determines that local conditions, environmental health and building congestion prevailing within this City make it necessary to add the following alternate procedure in the repair, rehabilitation, or demolition or removal of buildings or structures or portions thereof for good cause, and therefore the following Section 202.5 shall be added to the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings to read as follows: Section 202-5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 202-5. Alternate Procedure for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. The City Council in lieu of using Section 202. may use, as hereafter set forth, the following alternate procedure in the repair, rehabilitation, or demolition and removal of buildings or structures or portions thereof within the city:" SECTION 14. That Section 7-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 7-4. Adoption of Uniform Mechanical Code. That certain code designated as the "Uniform Mechanical Code, 1988 Edition," including " Appendices A, B and C" contained therein, published jointly by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials and the International Conference of Building Officials, one (1) copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk for public record and inspection, is hereby adopted by reference and made a part of this chapter as though set forth in this chapter in full, subject, however, to the amendments, additions and deletions set forth in this chapter and by the State of California Building Standards Commission and said code shall be known as the Mechanical Code of the City of Hermosa Beach. Whenever the term "jurisdiction" appears in said code it shall mean and refer to the City of Hermosa Beach. Whenever the term "building official" appears in said code it shall mean and refer to the Director of Building and Safety of the City of Hermosa Beach." 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 15. That Section 7-4.1. is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 203 of said mechanical code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 203. (a) General. In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building official relative to the application and interpretations of this code, there shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals consisting of members who are qualified by experience and training to pass upon matters pertaining to mechanical design, construction and maintenance and public health aspects of mechanical systems and who are not employees of the jurisdiction. Said board shall be the same Board of Appeals specified in Section 204 of the Uniform Building Code as amended by Section 7.1.1. of this Code. The building official shall be an ex officio member and shall act as secretary to said board but shall have no vote upon any matter before the board. The Board of Appeals shall be appointed by the governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure. The board shall adopt rules of procedure for conducting its business and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the appellant, with a duplicate copy to the building official. (b) Limitations of Authority. The Board of Appeals shall have no authority relative to interpretation of the administrative provisions of this code nor shall the board be empowered to waive requirements of this code." x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 16. That Section 7-4.2. is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 17. That Section 11-1 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 11-1. Adoption of National Electric Code. "That certain code entitled "National Electrical Code, 1987 Edition" including the Uniform Administrative Code Provisions, promulgated and published by the National Fire Protection Association, one (1) copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk for public record and inspection, is hereby adopted by reference and made a part of this chapter as though set forth in this chapter in full, subject, however, to the amendments, additions and deletions set forth in this chapter and by the State of California Building Standards Commission and said code shall be known as the Electric Code of the City of Hermosa Beach. Whenever the term "jurisdiction" appears in said code it shall mean and refer to the City of Hermosa Beach. Whenever the term "building official" appears in said code it shall mean and refer to the Director of Building and Safety of the City of Hermosa Beach." SECTION 18. That Section 11-2 is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 19. That Section 11-3 is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 20. That Section 11-4 is hereby deleted in its entirety. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 21. That Section 11-5 is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 22. That Section 11-6 is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 23. That Section 11-7 is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 24. That Section 11-8 is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 25. That Section 11-9 is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 26. That Section 11-10 is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 27. That Section 11-11 is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 28. That Section 11-12. Permit Fees is renumbered to 11-2 and amended to read as follows: "Section 11-2. Fees. Section 304 of said electric code is hereby amended to replace the term "Table No. 3-A." with the term "the most recent executive order issued pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 2, Article XIII of the City Code." For purposes of determining fees only, the following definitions shall apply: (1) New General use branch circuits. a. The fees prescribed apply to new branch circuit wiring and the lighting fixtures, switches, receptacles, appliances or other utilization 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 equipment permitted to be supplied by these branch circuits. b. For the purposes of this subsection, each ungrounded conductor of a multiwire branch circuit is counted as one circuit. Exception: Individual multiwire branch circuit supplying one appliance may be counted as one circuit. c. For the purposes of this subsection, three-phase lighting branch circuits are counted as two (2) branch circuits. (2) Adding outlets (to existing branch circuits) or temporary lights and yard lighting. a. Each outlet added to an existing branch circuit shall be counted as one unit and each lighting fixture connected thereto shall be counted as an additional unit except as modified in the following provisions of this subsection. b. An outlet shall mean a point or place on a fixed -wiring installation from which electric current is controlled, or is supplied to a lamp, lighting fixture, fan clock, heater , range, motor, or other electrical appliance or equipment. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c. An outlet box for two (2) or more switches or receptacles shall be considered as one unit. (3) Motors, transformers, heating appliances and miscellaneous equipment or appliances. a. The fees prescribed cover the inspection of the supply branch circuit and the utilization equipment supplied therefrom and the control equipment therefor. b. Except where supplied by branch circuits rated over fifty (50) amperes, the fees required apply only to nondwelling occupancies. The fee for each motor, transformer, heating appliance, welder, rectifier, x-ray machine, storage battery system, infrared industrial heating appliance, cooking or baking equipment, studio effects lighting, and other miscellaneous equipment or appliances shall be given in the rating table of the executive order. c. Where fixed equipment is supplied by flexible cords to facilitate servicing or replacement, those fees shall apply to the receptacle outlet supplying the equipment. Those fees shall also apply for each receptacle outlet installed for the supply of portable equipment rated larger than three (3) H.P., K.W., or K.V.A. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 d. For any equipment or appliance containing more than one motor, or other current consuming utilization components in addition to the motor or motors, the combined electrical ratings converted to K.V.A. of all shall be used to determine the fee. For the purpose of this subsection, one H.P. or one K.W. is equivalent to one K.V.A. The total ampere ratings of all receptacles installed on a factory fabricated wireway assembly for studio effects lighting may be used in computing the fees therefor. e. The fees for a change of location or replacement of equipment on the same premises shall be the same as that for a new installation. However, no fees shall be required for moving any temporary construction motor from one place to another on the same site during the time of actual construction work after a permit has once been obtained for such motor and the fees required therefor have been paid. (4) Required fire warning, communications and emergency control systems. For the purposes of this subsection, devices shall include all signaling equipment, stations, power equipment such as damper actuators or door holding device, and communication jacks or outlets. (5) Service and switchboard sections. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a. Fees shall be required for the installation, reinstallation, replacement or alteration of each service and each switchboard section. b. For the purpose of this subsection, a switchboard section means any portion of complete switchboard, distribution board, or motor control center which is prevented by the structural framework from being separated into smaller units. c. The fees for services shall be determined from the ampacity of the set of service entrance conductors or the total ampere rating of the service equipment. d. No fee need be paid for switchboard section which incorporates service equipment for which service fees were paid. SECTION 29. That Section 11-13. is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 30. That Section 11-14 is renumbered to Section 11-3 and hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 11-3. Nonmetallic -Sheathed Cable. Section 336-3 of said electric code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 336-3. Uses Permitted. Type NM and Type NMC cables shall be permitted to be used in one- and two-family dwellings 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (FNP): See Section 310-10 for temperature limitations of conductors." SECTION 31. That Section 11-115 is renumbered to Section 11-4 and is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 11-4. Condominium Installations. Where conductors serving a condominium pass through a condominium which they do not serve, as in the case of multi -family dwelling structures, said conductors shall be enclosed in an approved conduit or raceway." SECTION 32. That Section 11-16 is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 33. That Article II. Electrical Materials, Appliances, Etc., Sections 11-17 through 11-26 are hereby repealed in their entirety. SECTION 34. That Section 24-1. is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 24-1. Adoption of Uniform Plumbing Code. That certain code entitled "Uniform Plumbing Code, 1988 Edition", including appendices and the Installation Standards contained therein, promulgated and published jointly by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials and the International Conference of Building Officials, one (1) copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk for public record and inspection, is hereby adopted by reference and made a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 part of this chapter as though set forth in this chapter in full, subject, however, to the amendments, additions and deletions set forth in this chapter and by the State of California Building Standards Commission and said code shall be known as the Plumbing Code of the City of Hermosa Beach. Whenever the term "jurisdiction" appears in said code it shall mean and refer to the City of Hermosa Beach. Whenever the term "building official" appears in said code it shall mean and refer to the Director of Building and Safety of the City of Hermosa Beach." SECTION 35. That Section 24-2 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 24-2. Violation and Penalties. The Uniform Plumbing Code contains language on violation and penalties, and it leaves blanks for cities to insert the amount of fine and imprisonment. Where such blanks are left to the cities, the City of Hermosa Beach hereby inserts five hundred dollars ($500.00) for the maximum fine and six (6) months for the maximum imprisonment. For example, in Section 20.3 of the 1988 Uniform Plumbing Code, insert "five hundred dollars ($500.00)" in the space provided on line three, insert "City or the County" in the space provided on line 4, and insert "six (6)" in the space provided on line 5." SECTION 36. That Section 24-2.1. is hereby deleted in its entirety. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 37. That Section 24-2.2. is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 38. That Section 24-2.3 is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 39. That Section 24-2.4 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 24-2.4. Fees. The schedule of fees contained in Section 20.7 of the Uniform Plumbing Code is hereby deleted and the schedule of fees most recently enacted by executive order pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 2, Article XII of the City Code is hereby substituted therefor." SECTION 40. That Section 24-2.4.1 is hereby deleted in its entirety. SECTION 41. That Section 24-2.5. is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 24-2.5. Board of Appeals Section 20.14 of said plumbing code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 20.14 (a) General. In order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building official relative to the application and interpretations of this code, there shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 consisting of members who are qualified by experience and training to pass upon matters pertaining to plumbing design, construction and maintenance and public health aspects of plumbing systems and who are not employees of the jurisdiction. Said board shall be the same board of Appeals specified in Section 204 of the Uniform Building Code as amended by Section 7.1.1. of this Code. The building official shall be an ex officio member and shall act as secretary to said board but shall have no vote upon any matter before the board. The Board of Appeals shall be appointed by the governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure. The board shall adopt rules of procedure for conducting its business and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the appellant, with a duplicate copy to the building official. (b) Limitations of Authority. The Board of Appeals shall have no authority relative to interpretation of the administrative provisions of this code nor shall the board be empowered to waive requirements of this code." SECTION 42. That Section 24-2.9. is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 24-2.9. Abandoned sewers and sewage disposal facilities. Section 1119 (a) of said plumbing code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1119(a). Abandoned sewers and sewage disposal facilities. Every abandoned building (house) sewer or part thereof shall be 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 plugged or capped in an approved manner as designated by the building official. Before any person plugs and/or caps such sewer or sewage disposal facilities contemplated in this section, he shall first post a cash bond with the City in an amount of not less such than one hundred dollars ($100.00) to guarantee capping of sewers and/or sewage disposal facilities, such bond to be returned to the permittee upon completion and inspection to the satisfaction of the building official." SECTION 43. Effective Date. That this ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect commencing January 1, 1990. SECTION 44. Publication. That the City Council does hereby designate the City Attorney to prepare a summary of this ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c) (1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. That prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 45. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF 1989. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY carole/ordubc November 3, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of November 14, 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE REPEALING EXISTING CHAPTER 12 IN ITS ENTIRETY, REPLACING IT WITH A NEW CHAPTER 12, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, THE 1988 EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS, AS AMENDED RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council waive further reading and introduce the attached ordinance for adoption.. . ANALYSIS: The adoption of the referenced codes will update the City's fire and life safety regulations to be in conformance with state law. As a general law city, Hermosa Beach is required to enforce the codes adopted by the state, although amendments for administration and local conditions can be made. The Uniform Fire Code is revised and updated every three years in order to keep it current with the various Building Codes and Electric Codes. The revisions to the 1988 Uniform Code are largely editorial and technical in nature. The largest single difference between the 1982 and 1988 code is he total revision and expansion of Article 80, hazardous materials. Staff has reviewed the 1988 Uniform Fire Code and has proposed amendments to certain sections of the code to reflect local conditions and requirements. One of the more significant local amendments proposed is to the regulations for automatic fire -extinguishing systems. Staff is proposing a reduction in the maximum floor areas where fire sprinklers are required as follows: *Drinking and dining establishments from 5,000 to 3,500; *Exhibition and display rooms from 12,000 to 3,500; *Retail sales buildings from 12,000 on any floor to 3,500 on any floor from 24,000 on all floors to 5,000 on all floors from 3 stories to 1 story; *Apartments from 15 dwelling units to 5,000 square feet; and *Hotels from 20 or more guest rooms to 5,000 square feet. 1 5b Staff feels that these more stringent requirements are necessary for the protec- tion of life and property because of the density of our city, the abilities and equipment of our fire department, and the adequacy of the fire flow system. Other examples of proposed Uniform Fire Code revisions include the following: 1. The standpipe requirements are amended from 4 stories to 3 stories( this is in keeping with the previously adopted code and amendments); 2. The bonfire,outdoor rubbish burning, incinerator construction, and hours of burning regulations are amended to reflect the current adopted standards for the city; 3. The regulations regarding storage of combustible rubbish within a building are amended to require sprinkler protection; 4. The current regulations regarding tire storage, fumigation, and gasoline dispensers have been included; and 5. The current fire flow and hydrant spacing requirements have been used to amend those set forth in the code. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt the Uniform Fire Code and Standards without the local amendments. Res'-ctfully ubitted, S ve S. W s iewski Director of Public Safety Concur• Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager ft,ijL William Grove, Director of Building and Safety 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING EXISTING CHAPTER 12 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE IN ITS ENTIRITY AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, THE 1988 EDITIONS OF THE UNI- FORM FIRE CODE, AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS, AS AMENDED. WHEREAS, the 1988 editions of the Uniform Fire Codes have been adopted by the State of California, with amendments; and WHEREAS, local amendments may be made to those codes to address local needs; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that local climactic and congestion require amendments to further promote by eliminating combustible roofing and expanding the for automatic fire -extinguishing systems. conditions fire safety requirements NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The existing Chapter 12 of the "Hermosa Beach Municipal Code" is repealed in it's entirity. SECTION 2. A new Chapter 12 is added to the "Hermosa Beach Municipal Code" to read as follows: CHAPTER 12 FIRE PREVENTION CODE SECTION 12-1. Adoption of uniform fire code and standards. There is hereby adopted by the city for the purpose of prescrib- ing regulations governing conditions hazardous erty from fire and explosion that certain Code known as the Uniform Fire Code 25 II dards published by the Western and the Uniform to life and prop - and Standards Fire Code Stan - Fire Chiefs Association and the 26 International Conference of Building Officials, being particular - 27 ly the 1988 Editions thereof, save and except such portions as 28 are hereinafter deleted, modified or amended by Section 12-7 of this Ordinance, three (3) copies of which Code and Standards have -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 been and are now filed in the office of the city clerk and the same are hereby adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at length herein, and from the date on which this Ordinance shall take effect, the provisions thereof shall be controlling within the limits of the City of Hermosa Beach. Permits as required by provisions within this code may be issued for an indefinite period of time, subject, however, to the right of the Fire Chief on his designee to revoke said permit for mis- use or violation of the terms of the permit. SECTION 12-2. Definitions. (a) "jurisdiction". Shall mean the City of Hermosa Beach. (b) "corporation counsel". Shall mean the attorney for the City of Hermosa Beach. (c) "building code". Shall mean the current edition of volume I, III and IV of the building code published by the Interna- tional Conference of Building Officials, including its revi- sions, additions, and amendments and including the current edition of the uniform building code standards. (d) "may". Shall mean permissible; the word "shall" is held to mean mandatory. SECTION 12-3. Establishment of limits of districts in which 25 storage of explosives and blasting agents is to be prohibited. 26 27 28 -2- 1 The limits referred to in section 77.106(b) of the Uniform Fire 2 Code, in which storage of explosives and blasting agents is pro - 3 hibited, are hereby established as follows: All property zoned 4 for residential and commercial uses. 5 SECTION 12-4. Establishment of limits of districts in which 6 storage of flammable liquids in outside aboveground tanks is to 7II be prohibited. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The limits referred to in section 79.501 of the Uniform Fire Code in which storage of flammable liquids in outside aboveground tanks is prohibited, are hereby established as follows: All prop- erty zoned for residential and commercial uses. SECTION 12-5. Establishment of limits of districts in which new bulk plants for flammable or combustible liquids are to be prohibited. The limits referred to in section 79.1401 of the Uniform Fire Code, in which new bulk plants for flammable or combustible liquids are prohibited, are hereby established as follows: All property zoned for residential and commercial uses. SECTION 12-6. Establishment of limits in which bulk storage of liquified petroleum gases is to be prohibited. The limits referred to in Section 82.103(a) of the Uniform Fire Code, in which storage of liquified petroleum gas is restricted, are hereby established as follows: All property zoned for residential and commercial uses. SECTION 12-7. Amendments made in the Uniform Fire Code. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 The Uniform Fire Code, 1988 Edition, is hereby amended and changed in the following respects: SECTION 10.306F Article 10, Division III, Entitled Automatic Fire -extinguishing systems is amended to read as follows: (c) Group A Occupancies. 1. Drinking establishments. An auto- matic sprinkler system shall be installed in rooms used by the occupants for the consumption of alcoholic beverages and unsepar- ated accessory uses where the total area of such rooms and assem- bly uses exceeds 3500 square feet. For uses to be considered as separated, the separation shall be not less than as required for a one-hour occupancy separation. The area of other uses shall be included unless separated by at least a one-hour occupancy separation. (3) Exhibition and display rooms. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in Group A Occupancies which have more than 3500 square feet of floor area which can be used for exhibition or display purposes. (d) Group B, Division 2 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler sys- tem shall be installed in retail sales room classed as Group B, Division 2 Occupancies where the floor area exceeds 3500 square 23 feet on any floor or 5000 square feet on all floors or in Group 24 B, Division 2 retail sales occupancies more than one story in 25height. The area of mezzanines shall be included in determining 26 the area where sprinklers are required. 27 28 (h) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler sys- tem shall be installed throughout every apartment house three or 1 more stories in height or containing more than 5000 feet on all 2 floors, and every hotel three or more stories in height or con - 3 taining more than 5000 feet on all floors. Residential or quick - 4 response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dwelling 5 unit and guest room portions of the building. 6 Table No. 10.309 of Article 10, Division III, Standpipe Require - 7 ments, is hereby amended so that three stories shall be sub - 8 stituted wherever the table refers to four stories. 9 10 SECTION 11.101. Article II, Division 1 of the Uniform Fire Code, 11 entitled "Bonfires and Outdoor Rubbish Fires," is hereby amended 12 to read as follows: 13 SECTION 11.101. Bonfires and Outdoor Rubbish Fires. 14 15 (a) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to 16 ignite, set fire to, or cause or permit to be ignited or burned, 17 any grass, weeds, trees, brush, paper, shavings, boxes, trash, 18 rubbish, or other combustible materials within the city, except 19 and unless such combustible materials are burned in approved mul- 20 tiple-chamber incinerators, which have been first approved by the 21 Fire Chief of the city and the chief building inspector of the 22 city, and such approval is granted in writing by such officers. 23 (b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, it 24 shall be lawful for any person to set fire and burn combustible 25 materials in any permanent fireplace, grill, or barbecue pit, 26 providing such burning is for the purpose of preparing food or 27 II providing heat for human habitation, but in no case shall such 28 II burning be for the purpose of disposing of combustible trash or -5- 1 rubbish. All such fires shall be kept under competent and con - 2 tinuous supervision and all flammable and combustible material 3 near any such fireplace, grill, or barbecue pit, shall be removed 4 a sufficient distance so as not to constitute a fire hazard. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (c) Outdoor fires such as pit barbecues or bonfires held in con- nection with special activities, but not otherwise prohibited by city or county ordinances may be permitted, if in the opinion of the Fire Chief, such fires do not create a hazard to persons or property, by obtaining a permit from the fire department. (d) For the purpose of safety, all outdoor fires when not kindled or maintained within a permanent fireplace, grill, or barbecue pit, shall be deemed unlawful without a permit from the fire 14 department. The Fire Chief may prohibit all outdoor fires when 15 atmospheric conditions or local circumstances make such fires 16 hazardous. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SECTION 11.105. Article 11, Division I, of the Uniform Fire Code, 1988 Edition, is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 11.105. Types and Construction of Incinerators. (a) Every incinerator used within this jurisdiction shall be con- structed and maintained in accordance with the requirements of the Los Angeles County Air Pollution Control District, and the building code and mechanical code of this city. 26 (b) Whenever an incinerator becomes a public hazard or becomes 27 unsafe or is likely to cause fire to spread to neighboring prop - 28 erties or otherwise endanger the public peace, health and safety of the citizens of the city, then upon notice, the fire chief may -6- 1 prohibit the use of such incinerator. Thereafter, it shall be 2 unlawful to use or maintain the same within the city. 3 4 5 6 7 (c) Every incinerator shall be equipped and maintained with a spark arrestor constructed of iron, heavy wire mesh, or other noncombustible material, with openings not larger than one half inch. 8 SECTION 11.112. Article 11, Division I, of the Uniform Fire Code, 9 1988 Edition, is hereby amended to read as follows: 10 SECTION 11.112. Hours of burning. 11 12 Burning of waste matter is prohibited except in an approved in - 13 cinerator as defined in Section 11.105(a). 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (a) Burning in approved incinerators as defined in Section 11.105(a) is subject to the rules and regulations of the Los Angeles County Air Pollution Control District. SECTION 11.201. Article 11, Division II, subsection (b) of the Uniform Fire Code, 1988 Edition, is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 11.201. Accumulation of Waste Material. 23 (b) Storage within a building. Whenever it is necessary for a 24 person to store or accumulate combustible or flammable rubbish or 25 waste material within any building, structure, or enclosure, then 26such material shall be securely stored in metal or metal -lined 27 receptacles or bins equipped with tight -fitting covers or in 28 rooms or vaults constructed of noncombustible materials, with an approved heat actuated self-closing fire door and the storage -7- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 area shall be protected by an automatic sprinkler system on the basis of one head per fifty (50) square feet or portion thereof. SECTION 14.104(c) of Article 14, Group R. Division 1 Occupancies. A manual and automatic fire alarm system shall be installed in apartment houses three or more stories in height (mezzanines and lofts shall be considered as stories), or containing more than 15 dwelling units and in hotels three or more stories in height or containing 20 or more guest rooms. ARTICLE 31 of the Uniform Fire Code, 1988 Edition is hereby amen- ded to read as follows: SECTION 31.107. Inside Tire Storage. Tires stored inside of buildings shall not block doors, windows, or exitways. Piles and racks of tires which are placed directly against and parallel to walls shall not extend out from said walls more than fire (5) feet. Piles or racks of tires placed in rows perpendicular to the walls shall not exceed ten (10) feet in width or fifty (50) feet in length. Every row of tires shall be accessible on at least two (2) sides by an aisleway at least three (3) feet in width. Tires which are stored in such pattern as to form dead-end aisle - ways against the walls of buildings shall terminate at an aisle - way at least six (6) feet wide at the inside end of such pile. Every rack or pile of tires shall be kept at least eighteen (18) inches below sprinkler heads in a sprinklered building. Piles of tires shall be maintained in such manner as to ensure stability 1 and not become a hazard by falling during a fire or other emer- 2 gency. Under no circumstances shall a pile or rack of tires ex - 3 ceed twelve (12) feet in height unless approved by the Fire 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Chief. SECTION 31.108. Outside Tire Storage. Piles of tires or carcasses shall not exceed two thousand (2,000) cubic feet in volume and shall be separated from every other pile by an aisleway at least ten (10) feet in width. Under no circum- stances shall a pile of tires exceed twelve (12) feet in height unless approved by the Fire Chief. SECTION 31.109. All Tire Storage. 14 It is the intent of this section that all tire storage, regard - 15 less of whether such storage is in connection with a tire 16 II rebuilding plant, shall be made to comply with Sections 31.107 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and 31.108. Article 47 of the Uniform Fire Code, 1988 Edition is hereby amen- ded to read as follows: SECTION 47.113. Pan Locks. Whenever doors leading into the building or structure being fumi- gated cannot be bolted or secured from the inside, pan locks shall be provided to prohibit access into the building or struc- ture to persons other than the fumigator. SECTION 47.114. Chloropicrin. -9- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 To discourage entrance into the building or structure being fumi- gated, unless a watchmen would otherwise be required, chloropic- rin shall be added to the fumigant at the rate of one ounce for each fifteen thousand (15,000) cubic feet of space being fumigated. SECTION 47.115. Fumigation Inspection. The fire department shall make a visual inspection of all build- ings or other structrues immediately prior to the release of the fumigant into the building or structure, to determine whether the safety precautions outlined in this section have been met. SECTION 79.903 (f) of Article 79, Division IX, of the Uniform Fire Code, Entitled Special -Type -Dispensers, is hereby amended to read as follows: Approved special dispensing systems such as, but not limited to, coin operated and remote preset types, are permitted at service stations provided there is at least one qualified attendant on duty while the station is open to the public. (1) The attendant's primary duty shall be to supervise, observe and control the dispensing of class I liquids into portable con- tainers not in compliance with Section 79.902 (e) control sources of ignition, and immediately to handle accidental spills and fire extinguishers, if needed. 26 (2) Emergency controls shall be installed at a location accept - 27 able to the Fire Department, but controls shall be not more than 28 100 feet from dispensers. Instructions for the operation of dis- pensers shall be conspicuously posted. -10- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (3) Remote preset -type devices are to be in the "off" position •while not in use so that the dispenser cannot be activated with- out the knowledge of the attendant. (4) The dispensing device shall be in clear view of the attendant at all times and no obstacle shall be placed between the dispens- ing devices and the attendant. (5) The attendant shall at all times be able to communicate with persons in the dispensing area. APPENDIX III - A, Paragraph 4 Entitled Fire Flow Requirement for Buildings is amended as follows: (4) The minimum fire -flow requirements for one -and two-family dwellings not exceeding two stories in height, shall be 1500 gal- lons per minute (For other Residential buildings, Table No. III - A - A will be used). Exception: fire flow may be reduced 50 percent when the building is provided with approved automatic sprinkler system. The fire flow for buildings other than one -and two-family dwell- ings shall be not less than that specified in Table No. III - A - A. Exception: the required fire flow may be reduced up to 75 percent when the building is provided with approved automatic sprinkler system, but in no case less than 1500 gallons per minute. In types I and II -FR construction, only the three largest succes- sive floor areas shall be used. -11- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Appendix III - B, Entitled Fire Hydrant Location and Distribution is amended by adding a paragraph as follows: (4) The Chief may require closer spacing between hydrants because of grades, steep inclines or other geographic problems, and accessibility. SECTION 12-8. Modifications. The Fire Chief or his designee shall have power to modify any of the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code upon application in writ- ing by the owner or lessee, or his duly authorized agent, when there are practical difficulties in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the code, provided that the spirit of the code shall be observed, public safety secured, and substantial justice done. The particulars of such modification when granted or al- lowed and the decision of the Fire Chief or his designee thereon shall be entered upon the records of the department and a signed copy shall be furnished to the applicant. SECTION 12-9. Appeals. Whenever the Chief of the fire department shall disapprove an application or refuse to grant a permit applied for, or when it is claimed that the provisions of the code do not apply or that the true intent and meaning of the code have been misconstructed or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may appeal from the deci- sion of the Chief of the fire department to the City Council within thirty (30) days from the date of the decision appealed. SECTION 12-10. New materials, processes or occupancies which may require permits. -12- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 The Fire Chief, the fire department plan check officer, and the Director of Building and Safety shall act as a committee to determine and specify what new materials, processes or occupan- cies shall require permits,• in addition to those now enumerated in said code, after giving affected persons reasonable opportuni- ty to be heard. Their decision shall be final. The Fire Chief shall post such list in a conspicuous place in his department and distribute copies thereof to interested persons. SECTION 12-11. Penalties. (a) Any person violating any of the provisions of this code shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00), or by imprisonment for a term not to exceed six (6) months in the city or county jail, or by both such fine and imprisonment. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation or per- mit it to continue; all such persons shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or defects within a reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified, each ten (10) days that pro- hibited conditions are maintained shall constitute a separate offense. (b) The application of the above penalty shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions. 25 II SECTION 12-12. Repeal of conflicting ordinances. 26 27 28 All former ordinances or parts thereof conflicting or inconsis- tent with the provisions of this chapter or of the Uniform Fire Code, 1988 Edition, hereby adopted, are hereby repealed. -13- 1 2 SECTION 12-13. Validity. The City of Hermosa Beach hereby declares that should any sec- 3II tion, paragraph, sentence or word of this chapter or of the Uni- 4II form Fire Code, 1988 Edition, hereby adopted, be declared for any 5 reason to be invalid, it is the intent of the city that it would 6 have passed all other portions of this chapter independent of the 7II elimination therefrom of any such portion as may be declared 8 11 invalid. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of November, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK -14- CITY ATTORNEY October 31, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council November 14, 1989 Approval of Amendment of Ordinance No. 83-720 Entitled "CREATING AND ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL EVENT POLICY" ; and Approval of Special Event Rules and Regulations. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission the City Council amend Ordinance No. 83-720 per attachment A; and approve the Special Event Rules and Regulations, attachment B. BACKGROUND • Over the past couple of years various requests have been made of the City regarding different special events for which the City had no policy. In view of that and in response to the Council's request for review of the filming policy as well, the Special Event Policy is before you this evening. ANALYSIS This amended version of the original ordinance gives more clarity to the various classifications of users; lists the various permits that are available and indicates where fees will be charged. All of this is based on the history of requests the department has received over the years. Staff has tried to anticipate every kind of request that may be made of the City. And it is all included in this amended Ordinance. The Commission and staff feel this amended Ordinance is more comprehensive than the existing one. Previous to this, filming, block parties and park reservations for fund raisers was not part of the ordinance. The Special Event Rules and Regulations provide more specific information regarding procedures for obtaining the permits, and pertinent information the applicant should have regarding the City's parameters for these events. The rules and regulations also contain the fees and charges that will be charged for the permit. These fees and charges may change upon review by Commission, Staff and City Council. That is why a Resolution establishing the various fees is also before you this evening for approval. It is easier to change a Resolution that an Ordinance and that is why the fees are not included in the Ordinance. oa It is suggested by staff the fees and charges are reasonable and reflect the costs reasonably borne by the City. In instances where a location fee is charged, essentially that is a rental fee for use of an area owned by the City. The fees recommended for processing.a permit reflect the City's actual cost. Processing a permit involves staff time, memos, phone calls, letters, etc. There is one instance where there is no fee charged for processing a permit. That is to Hermosa residents for obtaining a park reservation for an informal gathering. It has been staff's experience that this type of permit does not involve a great deal of time. However, if a fee were calculated, it would be approximately $10. The Commission did not want to implement this type of charge . There were 140 park permits issued last fiscal year. The Council may choose to implement this fee. Section 22-5 of the Proposed Ordinance refers to commercial groups reguesting a permit from the City. The pro volleyball or commercially sponsored volleyball tournaments fall into this category. Attachment C is the Policy/Rules and Regulations for this type of event and was approved by the City Council in December, 1987. This policy has worked very well for the City and no changes are recommended at this time. Res ectfully� submitted, Alana Mastrian-Handman Director Dept. of Community Resources Concur: even B. North • aft City Manager Attachment A (1 of 5) ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT POLICY. WHEREAS, discussions regarding amending the Special Event Permit Policy were held by the Perks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission on September 27 and October 25, 1989; and WHEREAS, the City Council in order to assure public order and tranquillity within the City's outdoor facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council does strive to equitably administer major events held in the City's outdoor public facilities; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That section, 22-5 of the City Code entitled "Special Event Permit Policy" shall be amended as follows: Section 22-5: Permits: Commercial Groups Permits shall be required for any Commercial Group requesting use of any outdoor area or public facility within the City of Hermosa Beach. Such permits shall be subject to contract negotiations with the City with a set minimum permit fee of $1,500 per day plus all costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event. Section 22-5.1. Permits: Non -Profit Organizations Permits shall be required for any non-profit group requesting use of any outdoor area or public facility within the City of Attachment A (2 of 5) Hermosa Beach. Such permits shall be subject to a per participant spectator fee established by Resolution of the City Council plus all costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event. Any event numbering in excess of 1,500 combined participants and spectators shall be subject to contract negotiations with the City of Hermosa Beach and fee adjustments. Section 22-5.2, Permits: Non Profit Organizations: Pass-thrus Permits shall be required for any non-profit group requesting use of any outdoor area or public facility for a pass through event within the City of Hermosa Beach. Such events shall be subject to a permit processing fee established by Resolution of the City Council plus all costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event. Section 22-5.3. Permits: Block Parties Requests for permits for use of public right-of-ways for Block Parties may be made only by Hermosa Beach residents to the Director of Public Safety. All permit requests shall be subject to review and approval by the Department Director or designee. Such permits are subject to a permit processing fee established by Resolution of the City Council. Section 22-5.4. Reservations: Parks Park reservations shall be available year round to accommodate Hermosa Beach Residents for informal or neighborhood gatherings. Reservations are optional and there shall be no Attachment A (3 of 5) charge except when the City incurs direct costs on behalf of the event. Reservations can be made for the following parks only: Valley Park: Corner of Gould and Valley Dr. Bicentennial Park: 4th and Ardmore Greenwood Park: PCH & Aviation Section 22-5.5. Permits: Parks: Fundraising A permit shall be required for any Hermosa Beach based non-profit organization requesting use of a park for fundraising activities. Only Greenwood Park shall be available for this type of use. The above -referenced organizations shall be permitted to reserve the park for this type of activity up to four (4) times per fiscal year. Such permits shall be subject to a permit processing fee established by Resolution of the City Council plus any direct costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event. Section 22-5.6. Beach Permits No permits are required for use of beach volleyball courts except for the courts located at the Pier. These courts are reserved by the City of Hermosa Beach for special events. Section 22-5.7. Permits: Commercial Filming A permit shall be require or any filming taking place in or on any City owned property art/ property. Such permits shall be subject to fee established by Resolution of the City Council. Section 22-5.8. Application for Permit or Reservations 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Attachment A (4 of 5) All organizations or individuals shall make application to the Department of Community Resources for issuance of a Special Event Permit or a Park Reservation. Section 22-5.9. Waiver of Fees The Department of Community Resources Director or designee may waive or reduce permit fees for non-profit organizations upon a showing by the organization that the financial gain from the event would be substantially offset by the fees charged. However, direct costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event may not be waived. Should a request for waiver or reduction of fees be denied by the Director, applicant may appeal the decision to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission. Said appeal must be submitted to the Commission in writing via the Department of Community Resources at least eight working days prior to the Commission meeting. Section 22-5.10. Rules and Regulations Rules and regulations shall be established for the administration of this policy. Said rules and regulations may be amended for each event to address public safety concerns. All pertinent City ordinances shall be enforced. Section 22-5.11. Fees and Charges All fees and charges may be changed by Resolution of the City Council. Attachment A (5 of 5) SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from the date of adoption; and prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days from the passage thereof, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy REader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. VG°44 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY Attachment B (1 of 2) City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa. Beach, CA 90254 318-0280 or 379-3312 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT RULES AND REGULATIONS Permits shall be required for any group or organization requesting use of a public outdoor area or facility within the City of Hermosa Beach. A. General Information: 1. All groups or organizations shall address requests to the Department of Community Resources, 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, 318-0280. 2. The Special Event Policy and all pertinent rules and regulations will accompany the permit. These rules and regulations must be strictly adhered to and all pertinent City Ordinances shall be enforced. 3. The Department of Community Resources will review the permit and either approve or deny the request. The decision can be appealed to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission (see Special Event Ordinance). Some requests may be sent to City Council for their review and/or final approval. 4. A SPECIAL EVENT APPLICATION must be filled out at least 15 working days prior to date of use for small events. Larger events will require more time to process. B. Classification of Use: 1. Commercial Groups: Any individual or group that is not registered non-profit organization or any event/activity sponsored by commercial entities/advertisers. Event must be open to the general public. 2. Non-profit Groups: A) Any group or organization registered with the Federal Government as a non-profit corporation and that has a non-profit corporation number. B) Any group or organization recognized by the City of Hermosa Beach as a local service organization. Event must be open to the general public. In order to qualify for non-profit status: 1) 100% of all proceeds collected on behalf of the event (after operational and permit expenses are met) must go to the non-profit organization. This includes all entry, TV and sponsorship proceeds. 2) A registered non-profit organization must be the permit applicant. 3. Private Groups/Parties: Special event permits will not be granted to private groups. Valley Park, Greenwood and Bicentennial Park are available for reservation by Hermosa Beach residents at no charge. Block parties require police permit and are subject to a permit fee. Beach volleyball courts are available on a first come first serve basis for all individuals. The Pier Avenue Courts are reserved by the City for special events. 4. Pass thru Event: A pass thru event is exactly what the cisme implies, events that just pane through the City of Hermeee Muth. The event doe® not terminate or begin in the City. The participants merely pass through on their way to their destination. Attachment B (2 of 2) C. Fees and Charges 1. Commercial Groups: Amount shall be negotiated between the City and applicant with a minimum amount set at $1,500 per day. 2. Non-profit Groups: Fee shall be $1 per participant and spectator up to 1,500 people. The organization shall be subject to contract negotiations with the City and will be in the same category as Commercial Groups with participants and spectators numbering more than 1,500. 3. Non-profit Groups: Pass Thrus Permit processing fee: $100 4. *Block Parties: Hermosa Beach Residents Only Permit processing fee: $25 Amplification permit fee: $30 *This permit is to be obtained through the Hermosa Beach Police Department. 5. Park Reservations: Hermosa Beach Residents Only No Charge for permit processing. 6. Park Reservations: Fundraising Permit processing fee: $25 7. Filming: Permit processing fee Location fee (public property only) Business License fee Meter buy out 8. Still Photography: $300 $500 per day $250 (beginning 11th day ) $200 per fiscal year $10 per meter Permit processing fee $50 Location fee $50 per day 9. In addition to fees listed here, all costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event shall be assumed by the applicant. Those costs shall be determined upon finalization of the permit. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PRO VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT(S) RULES AND REGULATIONS FEES Attachment C (1 of 4) Permit fee shall be Negotiated by both parties with minumum amount set at $1,500 per day. A non-refundable application processing fee of $500 will be required for all pro tournament requests. The deposit will be applied toward the $3,000 permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the City. All predetermined costs fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the City. SECURITY The City of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of .the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of the sponsor and/or its event promotion firm. Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide no less than ten security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other Tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the City's alcohol ordinance. The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide Police Officers for the event as follows for each day of tournament, 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM: 1 Sergeant 4 Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by Public Safety Director. Cost of officers shall be assumed by the event promotion firm/sponsor. Attachment C (2 of 4) CLEAN-UP Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the Tournament: . The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street. . Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue. The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the City each day of the Tournament. All maintenance work is to be concluded by 8:00 PM each evening. Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: . Beach (impacted area) . Strand (impacted area) . Parking Lots B and C . Railroad Right-of-way or additional trash receptacles as needed LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES Event promotion firm/sponsor shall assume all costs for two (2) additional lifeguards each day of tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. INSURANCE Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide the CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $1 million combined single limit coverage. Event promotion firm/sponsor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of the event promotion firm/sponsor its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors; with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. Attachment C (3 of 4) ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required of the event promotion firm/sponsor. City staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for posting. City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of the event promotion firm/sponsor. CITY shall permit event promotion firm/sponsor to display two large replicas of their product. City staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. In the event of an alcohol sponsor, event promotion firm/sponsor shall be required to make two (2) announcements per hour informing spectators of the CITY'S alcoholic beverage ordinance. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimilies, etc. deemed necessary by event promotion firm/sponsor to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of event promotion firm/sponsor. PARKING Event promotion firm/sponsor shall be required to post signs throughout the impacted area as well as at major ingress roads to the CITY indicating 1) where there is free parking and 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide a shuttle bus service from a major satellite point(s) on the outskirts of or outside of Hermosa Beach. The City shall provide four (4) reserve officers to direct traffic at locations to be determined by the Hermosaf Beach Police Department. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events requested to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If the event promotion firm/sponsor desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by the event promotion firm/sponsor. Attachment C (4 of 4) The CITY Police Department shall act as liaison with various downtown merchants in an effort to mitigate any disruption during the Tournament. The CITY shall allow access to Tournament site for set-up thirty-six (36) hours prior to Tournament. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand for Tournament staff parking. The CITY shall allow event promotion firm/sponsor the opportunity to sell official volleyball concession items per certain conditions. No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID POLICY. MISCELLANIOUS EVENT PROMOTION FIRM/SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide as many portable port -a -johns as determined necessary by City staff. Event promotion firm/sponsor shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. Event promotion firm/sponsor shall be responsible for all prize money, volleyball equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting such a tournament. Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Dept. of Community Resources. November 6, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council November 14, 1989 APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION C.C. 89 - ADOPTING FEES AND CHARGES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission the City Council approve the attached Resolution establishing fees and charges for special events. BACKGROUND Fees and charges for special events have previously been set by motion of the City Council. The fees and charges in this Resolution have been available for public review since Oct. 25, 1989, at which time the Commission did approve them. ANALYSIS Elsewhere on your agenda this evening is with Special Events. This Resolution establishes certain fees that Ordinance. Concur: evin B. Northcraft City Manager an Ordinance dealing for events listed in Respectfully submitted dZicte AaE0,11444a Alana Mastrian-Handman Director Dept. of Community Resources CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Per my note on the film policy memo, I recommend the Council amend the fee for filming to the current rate of $700/395 when considering the attached resolution. 1 $6 1 RESOLUTION C.C. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH ADOPTING FEES AND CHARGES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS HELD IN THE CITY ON CITY PROPERTY. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on December 14, 1989 to consider adopting fees and charges; and WHEREAS, the City Council strives to equitably administer major events held within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council makes every effort to recoup costs reasonably borne. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does adopt the following fees and charges: Commercial Groups: Public Outdoor areas & Mise. Facilities Minimum $1,500per day Non -Profit Groups: Public Outdoor Areas & Misc. Facilities $1 per participant & spectator Non -Profit Groups: Pass Thrus $100 Permit Fee Non -Profit Groups: Fundraising/Parks $ 25 Permit Fee Hermosa Beach Residents: Block Parties $ 25 Permit Fee 30 Amplification Fee Filming: Commercial $500/day Location Fee $250/day 11th day on $300 Permit Fee $ 10/day parking meters Still Photography: Commercial ATTEST: $ 50 Permit Fee $ 50/day Location Fee. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: MAALL 1 t4n0 CITY ATTORNEY November 1, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City council Meeting of of the City Council November 14, 1989 APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL FILM POLICY AND PROCEDURES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission the City Council approve attachment A, an amended Filming Policy & Procedures for the City of Hermosa Beach. BACKGROUND The City Council has directed staff and the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission to review this policy and to make changes as deemed appropriate. ANALYSIS Based on discussions held over the past several months, and the actual experiences the City has had with regard to filming over the past several years, the attached policy is before you for your final approval. The following are the amendments suggested for the policy. They have been incorporated into Attachment A. 1. Implement a permit processing fee of $300 per permit. This fee will cover the costs borne by the Dept. of Community Resources on behalf of the film companies. This fee will cover the cost of secretarial assistance in processing the permit; staff time to meet with location managers, monitor the filming activity, process interdepartmental memos and meetings to coordinate the filming; phone calls; vehicle use; etc. To date this department has not recovered those expenses. Every other City department that incurs expenses on behalf of the film companies does charge for those services. 2. Amend the location fee to $500 per day; $250 per day beginning the eleventh (11th) day of filming. This fee is a rental fee for use of City property for filming. If a film company films on private property, they would not pay this fee. However, they would pay the permit processing fee of $300 and any other costs incurred by any City departments on the film company's behalf. Two and a half years ago the location fee was $1,000. In an effort to assist the State Film Office and Los Angeles County, it was recommended the fee be amended to $500. This figure was determined by checking film fees with other Bc cities, talking with movie companies and the State Film Office. However, the City Council chose a fee of $700. It is still felt by the Commission and staff the $500 fee is more reasonable. Given the amount of filming that has taken place in the City over the last two years, it appears the fees being charged are acceptable to the film companies. 3. Unless otherwise indicated by the Public Safety Director or his designee, streets shall not be barricaded for filming purposes. This section has been adhered to but never was put in writing. 4. Posting of Bonds may be required at staff discretion. In some instances the film companies have asked to make major cosmetic changes to City property and in cases such as those the City needs to be protected and the film company needs to restore everything back to its original state. The bond will assure the City that the work gets done. 5. No flyers of any kind are to be posted on City property unless expressly permitted by the City. The City is trying to clean up the appearance of the City by discouraging this. It is also against the City Code. 6. Filming between Memorial Day and Labor Day shall be limited to 20 days in the downtown area (west of Manhattan Avenue and between 8th and 15th Streets. There has been some discussion regarding filming taking place in the downtown area during the very congested summer months. This section was added per that concern. This will not apply to student films as those are of no impact to the City. The Commission and staff feel the amended policy addresses the concerns that have been voiced over the past several months about filming in the City. The City of Hermosa Beach has earned a good reputation with the State Film Office in that the City makes every effort to accommodate the film companies especially with our one stop process. That is, the Department of Community Resources handles all the arrangements between the film company and the various City departments. It is important to note that every complaint that is called in or addressed to a member of the film company is handled personally by City Staff or the film's Location Manager. Staff is not aware of any complainant not being fully satisfied with the manner in which the complaint was handled. 2 AIM For Fiscal Year 88/89 the following filming fees were collected: Permit Fees $ 7,050 Police Fees 21,389 Parking Fees 5,960 Business License Fees 1,400 Public Works Fees -0- Total 35,799 To date for Fiscal Year 89/90 the following filming fees were collected: Permit Fees $11,100 Police Fees 6,544 Parking Fees 7,417 Business License Fees 800 Public Works Fees 380 Total $26,241 Per these figures, it appears the City will exceed last fiscal year in filming revenue. Concur: evin B. Northcrft City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Respectfully Submitted, ae%.• Alana Mastrian-Handman Director Dept. of Community Resources I recommend the Council maintain the current daily film fee of $700/day. We have not been able to see whether it affects demand due to its late implementation; we can consider reducing later if the impact is negative. Attachment A (1 of 2) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FILMING POLICY AND PROCEDURES 1. A request for filming must be made to the City of Hermosa, Department of Community Resources at least 72 hours in advance of desired filming date. Said request must contain the following information: - Site of proposed filming - Dates and time frames - Name of movie company, address and phone number - Name of contact person, address and phone number - Number of people involved. In some instances more than 72 hours notification will be necessary to make permit arrangements. 2. A filming permit form must then be filled out completely. 3. The Department of Community Resources shall have authority to approve or deny each film request. Upon approval of the permit, the Department of Community Resources shall expedite all arrangements between the film company and the various City departments. RULES AND REGULATIONS: 1. Prior to filming each film must secure and submit to the Department of Community Resources a certificate of insurance in the amount of $1 million dollars NAMING "The City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees as additional insured." 2. All costs, whenever possible to determine in advance, shall be paid prior to filming. All other costs are to be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the City. 3. Any costs incurred by the City on behalf of the film company shall be paid by the film company. 4. Whenever possible, the City shall be recognized in the credits as the location site for the filming. 5. Each permit is treated separately and additional requirements may be added by the City. 6. The City may require the posting of bonds for certain filming activity. 7. No flyers or signs are to be posted on public property without the consent of the City. All flyers or signs must be removed immediately following the event. Attachment A (2 of 2) 8. Filming in the downtown area between 8th and 15th Streets and west of Manhattan Avenue shall be limited to a maximum of 20 days between Memorial Day and Labor Day. 9. Requests for parking must be made no later than 48 hours in advance of the filing dates. 10. All members of the production crews must wear I.D. tags while filming in Hermosa Beach. 11. The film company shall be responsible for notifying all impacted residences and businesses of the filming activity. Any objections to the filming must be reported to the Department of Community Resources immediately. 12. No major intersections shall be blocked during City rush hours: 6:30 a.m. - 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. 13. Unless otherwise indicated by the Public Safety Director or his designee, streets shall not be barricaded for filming purposes. FEES AND CHARGES A. Filming: Permit processing fee $300 Location fee (City property only) $500 per day/ $250 begin- ning 11th day. Business License Fee B Commercial still photography: Permit Processing Location Fee B. Parking Fees $200 per fiscal year $ 50 $100 per day City operated meters $ 10 ea per day Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 6, 1989 City Council Meeting November 14, 1989 ORDINANCE PERMITTING SALVAGING OF RECYCLABLE REFUSE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and introduce the attached ordinance. BACKGROUND The City Council at their meeting of October 24, 1989, rejected the registration of salvagers. Mayor directed staff to prepare an ordinance amending the City Code to allow salvaging of recyclable refuse when set out for separate pickup. ANALYSIS The attached ordinance will allow salvagers to collect recyclable refuse which is separated from regular residential refuse. In the case of commercial accounts, which includes multi -family dwellings utilizing bins, leaving the recyclables next to the bin is not a solution unless a specific arrangement is made with a salvager. Since the bins have varying pickup schedules, leaving recyclables next to them could interfere with their pickup and could be unsightly if not picked up. Many multi -family establishments also have limited security access which would hinder salvagers from collecting the recyclables. Staff is still pursuing establishing a "drop-off" recycling outlet which could serve the recycling desires of tenants of multi -family buildings. Respectfully submitted, role Lockhart, Admin. Aide Dept. of Building & Safety Concur: Concur: • &/161e'.01„, •William Grove, Kevin B. Northcraft Director, Buiding & Safety City Manager 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 89 - ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING HAPTER 27A "SANITATION, GARBAGE AND REFUSE" AS IT RELATES TO SALVAGING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ECTION 1. That Section 27A-5, "Collection by the city or its franchisee" be amended as follows: Section 27A-5 is amended by adding the following items to .ubsections (d) and (e): (d) Salvagers may collect recyclable refuse which is separated from containers normally placed for residential refuse collection. Recyclable refuse intended for salvage pickup shall be contained or bundled, separated as to type, and placed adjacent to containers set out for residential refuse collection. Recyclable items not collected by salvagers shall be collected with the regular refuse pickup. (e) Recyclable materials intended for salvage collection at commercial establishments shall be stored out of public view. Recyclable materials intended for salvage shall not be stored in a manner which interferes with regular refuse pickup. •ECTION 2. That Section 27A -6(g) is hereby amended to read as follows: (g) Scavenging is prohibited; however salvaging in accordance with the provison of Section 27A-5 is permitted. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 6)CtAA.L_ J CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY i f November 5, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of November 14, 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION RELATIONS RESOLUTION Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Employer -Employee Organization Relations Resolution (EEOR). Background: The purpose of an Employer -Employee Organization Relations Resolution is to provide a basis for the City's labor relations process under Government Code Section 3500 et. seq., commonly referred to as the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA). The Hermosa Beach Civil Service Board was requested to develop an EEOR, and, after lengthy deliberations and consideration of model EEOR's from the League of California Cities, the City of Tor- rance, the City of Redondo Beach, and a suggested model submitted by the Hermosa Beach Police Officer's Association, presented a draft EEOR to the City Council. That draft EEOR was subsequently modified by the City Council to delete references to fact-finding and binding arbitration as part of the impasse resolution process. Analysis: The MMBA, which was passed in 1969, authorized Public Employees the right to "form, join and participate in the activities of employee organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of representation on all matters of employer-employee relations" (section 3502). The purpose of the attached EEOR is to provide a basis for implementing the provisions of the MMBA. The current employee organizations which represent this city's employees are so recognized in the attached EEOR. Following the City Council's original review of the EEOR in January 1987 (at which time the proposed EEOR was amended to de- lete fact-finding and binding interest arbitration from the im- passe procedures) meetings were held with the current employee organizations. During those meetings two points of contention were identified. One point was that the EEOR did not provide for an appeal of the employee relations officer's determination of appropriate units (Article II, section 10). This concern was addressed and a provision under Article II, section 11, Appeals was added to allow the ability to appeal the employee relations officer's determination. The second point of contention raised by the employee organizations was the deletion of the processes of fact-finding and binding interest arbitration as included in the proposed version submitted by the Civil Service Board. On February 14, 1989, the City Council reaffirmed its opposition to binding interest arbitration as an impasse resolution process. It should be noted that organizations such as the League of Cal- ifornia Cities have consistently been opposed to legislation which would require binding arbitration for local governments. This opposition is based on the belief that binding arbitration places decisions which can effect the ability of the legislative body to establish budgetary priorities in the hands of a third party removed from the political process. On August 30, 1989, the current recognized employee organizations were advised that the EEOR was to be scheduled for City Council action. Both the Police Officers' Association and the California Teamsters, Local 911 have indicated their continued opposition to the EEOR on the grounds that binding arbitration is not included. Currently, in the absence of procedures such as contained in the attached EEOR, the process for determining issues at impasse in meet and confer negotiations, is to submit the matter to the City Council. The proposed EEOR modifies the current process by pro- viding for the option of mediation prior to the matter being sub- mitted to the City Council. The EEOR also sets forth procedures for: 1. The filing of a recognition petition be an employee organization (section 4); 2. City response to a "Recognition Petition" filed (section 5); 3. Procedure for "Decertification of Recognized Employee Organizations (section 8); 4. Determination of appropriate bargaining units (section 9); 5. Modifications of established units (section 10) 6. Appeals to unit determination (section 11); and, 7. Impasse procedures (section 16). These procedures recognize that any organization is organic in nature rather than static and provide for the orderly process of change when change becomes necessary. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager cc: Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association Teamsters Union, Local 911 Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RESOLUTION NO. EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION RELATIONS RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS ection 1. Statement of Purpose. his Resolution implements Chapter 10, Division 4, Title 1 of the overnment Code of the State of California (Sections 3500 et eq.) captioned "Local Public Employee Organizations," by provid- ng orderly procedures for the administration of employer- mployee relations between the City of Hermosa Beach and its em- loyees and to protect the public by assuring, at all times, the rderly and uninterrupted operations and services of city gove'rn- ent. However, nothing contained herein shall be deemed to upersede the provisions of State law, City ordinances, resolu- ions and rules which establish and regulate the merit and civil ervice system, or which provide for other methods of administer - ng employer-employee relations. This Resolution is intended, nstead, to strengthen merit, civil service and other methods of dministering employer-employee relations through the establish- ent of uniform and orderly methods of communications between mployees, employee organizations, and the City. t is the purpose of this Resolution to provide procedures for eeting and conferring in good faith with Recognized Employee rganizations of the employee's working unit regarding matters hat directly affect and primarily involve the wages, hours and 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ther terms and conditions of employment of employees in ap- ropriate units and that are not preempted by Federal or State aw. In furthering this purpose the resolution recognizes the ight of employees to join the recognized_e.mployee organ.ization. f the employee's work unit and defines procedures for the forma - ion and recognition of other employee organizations as appropri- te. However, nothing herein shall be construed to restrict any egal or inherent exclusive City rights with respect to matters f general legislative or managerial policy, which include among thers: The exclusive right to determine the mission of its con- tituent departments; commissions and boards; set standards of ervice; determine the procedures and standards of selection for mployment; direct its employees; take diciplinary action; elieve its employees from duty because of lack of work or for ther lawful reasons; maintain the efficiency of governmental ' perations; determine the methods, means and personnel by which overnment operations are to be conducted; take all necessary ctions to carry out its mission in emergencies; and exercise omplete control and discretion over its organization and the echnology of performing its work. ection 2. Definitions "City" means the City of Hermosa Beach, and, where appropriate erein, refers to the City Council or any duly authorized City epresentative as herein defined. "Appropriate Unit" means a unit of employee classes or posi- ions, established pursuant to Article II hereof. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 . "Recognized Employee Organization" means an employee organiza- tion which has been formally acknowledged by the City as the sole mployee organization representing the employees in an appropri- -te representation unit pursuant to Article II hereof, and there - •y assuming the corresponding obligation of fairly representing uch employees. . "Employee Organization" means any organization which includes mployees of the City and which has as one of its primary pur- oses, representing such employees in their relations with the ity. . "Confidential Employee" means an employee who, in the course f his or her duties, has access to information relating to the ity's administration of employer-employee relations. f. "Supervisory Employee" means any employee having authority, in the interest of the City, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, ecall, promote, discharge, assign, reward or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action if, in con- nection with the foregoing, the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgement. g - "Administrative Employee" means an employee performing office or non -manual work directly related to management policies or general business operations of the employer and such work in- cludes the exercise of discretion and independent judgement. 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 h. "Management Employee" means an employee having responsibility for formulating, administering,or managing the implementation of City policies and programs. i. "Consult/Consultation in Good Faith" means to communicate orally or in writing for the purpose of presenting and obtaining views or advising of intended actions; and as distinguished from meeting and conferring in good faith regarding matters within the required scope of such meet and confer process, does not involve an exchange of proposals and counter proposals in an endeavor to reach agreement, nor is it subject to Article IV hereof. j. "Meet and Confer" means to meet and confer promptly upon request by either party and continue for a reasonable period of time in order to freely exchange information, opinions and pro- posals and to endeavor to reach agreement on matters within tile scope of representation. k. "Employee Relations Officer" means the City Manager or the City Manager's duly authorized representative. 1. "Day" means calendar day unless expressly stated otherwise . m. "Mediation" means the efforts of an impartial third person functioning as an intermediary, to assist the parties in reaching a voluntary resolution to an impasse. n. "Impasse" means that the parties to a dispute over matters within the scope of representation have reached a point in meet- ing and conferring over a protracted period of time, at which 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 their differences in positions are so substantial or prolonged that future meetings would be Futile. ARTICLE II - REPRESENTATION UNITS Section 3. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF EXISTING EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION AND REPRESENTATION UNITS The City formally acknowledges that, at the time of adoption of this Resolution: A. California Teamsters Public, Professional & Medical Employees Union, Local 911, is the Recognized Employee Organiza- tion for all employees in any City department who are non -safety and whose duties are non -supervisory in nature. B. California Teamsters Public, Professional & Medcal Employees Union, Local 911, is the Recognized Employee Organiza- tion for all employees of the City in any department who are non - safety and whose primary duties are supervisory in nature as de- fined in section 2. C. California Teamsters Public, Professional & Medical Employees Union, Local 911, is the Recognized Employee Organiza- tion for all employees of the city who are non -safety and whose primary duties are confidential or administrative in nature as defined in section 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 D. The Hermosa Beach Police Association, IUPA AFL-CIO, Local 1985, is the Recognized Employee Organization for all sworn police personnel whose duties are primarily general or superviso- y in nature. E. The Hermosa Beach Fire Association is the Recog- ized Employee Organization for all fire safety personnel other than the position of Fire Chief/Director of Public Safety. F. The Hermosa Beach Police Association, IUPA AFL-CIO ocal 1985 is the Recognized Employee Organization for all sworn police personnel, other than the Police Chief/Director of Public afety, whose duties are primarily administrative in nature as •efined in section 2. . The Hermosa Beach Management Association is the Recognized, employee Organization for Management employees as defined in sec- tion 2. Currently recognized employee organizations shall provide infor- ation as specified in Section 4, A through I, within 30 days of the effective date of this resolution. Section 4. FILING OF RECOGNITION PETITION BY EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION An employee organization that seeks to be formally acknowledged as the Recognized Employee Organization representing the em- ployees in an appropriate unit shall file a petition with the Employee Relations Officer containing the following information and documentation: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A. Name and address of the employee organization. B. Names and titles ,of its officers. C. Names of employee organization representatives who are authorized to speak on behalf of the organization. D. A statement that the employee organization's primary purpose is representing employees in their employment relations with the City. E. A statement whether the employee organization is a chapter of, or affiliated directly or indirectly in any manner, with a local, regional, state, national or international or- ganization, and, if so, the name and address of each such other organization. F. Certified copies of the employee organization's constitution and by-laws. G. A designation of those persons, not exceeding two in number, and their addresses, to whom notice sent by Certified United States mail will be deemed sufficient notice on the em- ployee organization for any purpose. H. A statement that the employee organization has no restriction on membership based on race, color, creed, sex, na- tional origin, age, or physical disability. I. The job classifications or titles of employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate and the approximate number of member employees therein. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 J. A statement that the employee organization has in its possession proof of employee support as herein defined to establish that a majority of the employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate have designated the employee organization to rep- resent them in their employment relations with the City. Such written proof shall be submitted for confirmation to the Employee Relations Officer or to a mutually agreed upon disinterested third party. K. A request that the Employee Relations Officer for- mally acknowledge the petitioner as the Recognized Employee Or- ganization representing the employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate for the purpose of meeting and conferring in good faith. The Petition, including the proof of employee support and all accompanying documentation, shall be declared to be true, correct and complete under penalty of perjury, by the duly au- thorized officer(s) of the employee organization executing it. Section 5. CITY RESPONSE TO RECOGNITION PETITION Upon receipt of the Petition, the Employee Relations Officer shall determine whether: A. There has been compliance with the requirements of the Recognition Petition, and B. The proposed representation unit is an appropriate unit in accordance with Section 9 of this Article II. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 If an affirmative determination is made by the Employee Relations Officer on the foregoing two matters, the Officer shall so inform the petitioning employee organization, shall give writ- ten notice of such request for recognition to the employees in the unit and shall take no action on said request for thirty (30) days thereafter. If either of the foregoing matters are not af- firmatively determined, the Employee Relations Officer shall of- fer to consult thereon with such petitioning employee organiza- tion and, if such determination thereafter remains unchanged, shall inform that organization of the reasons therefore in writ- ing. The petitioning employee organization may appeal such determination in accordance with Section 11 of this resolution. Section 6. OPEN PERIOD FOR FILING CHALLENGING PETITION Within thirty (30) days of the date written notice was given to affected employees that a valid recognition petition for an appropriate unit has been filed, any other employee organiza- tion may file a competing request to be formally acknowledged as the exclusively recognized employee organization of the employees in the same or in an overlapping unit (one which corresponds with respect to some but not all the classifications or positions set forth in the recognition petition being challenged), by filing a petition evidencing proof of employee support in the unit claimed to be appropriate of at least thirty (30) percent and otherwise in the same form and manner as set forth in Section 4 of this Article II. If such challenging petition seeks establishment of an overlapping unit, the Employee Relations Officer shall call for a hearing on such overlapping petitions for the purpose of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ascertaining the more appropriate unit, at which time the petitioning employee organizations shall be heard. Thereafter, the Employee Relations Officer=.shall determine the appropriate unit or units in accordance with the standards in Section 9 of this Article II. The petitioning employee organizations shall have fifteen (15) days from the date notice of such unit deter- mination is communicated to them by the Employee Relations Of- ficer to amend their petitions to conform to such determination or to appeal such determination pursuant to Section 11 of this Article II. Section 7. ELECTION PROCEDURE The Employee Relations Officer shall arrange for a secret ballot election to be conducted by a party agreed to by the Employee Relations Officer and the concerned employee or -o ganization(s), in accordance with that party's rules and pro- cedures subject to the provisions of this Resolution. All em- ployee organizations who have duly submitted petitions which have been determined to be in conformance with this Article II, shall be included on the ballot. The ballot shall offer the employees the choice of representing themselves individually in their em- ployment relations with the City. Employees entitled to vote in such election shall be those persons employed in regular perma- nent positions within the designated appropriate unit who were employed during the pay period immediately prior to the date which ended at least fifteen (15) days before the date the elec- tion commences, including those who did not work during such period because of illness, vacation or other authorized leaves of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 absence, and who are employed by the City in the same unit on the date of election. An employee organization shall be formally acknowledged as the Recognized .Employee Organization for the designated appropriate unit following an election or run-off election if it received a numerical majority of all valid votes cast in the election. In an election involving three or more choices, where none of the choices receives a majority of the valid votes cast, a run-off election shall be conducted between the two choices receiving the largest number of valid votes cast, the rules governing an initial election being applicable to a un -off election. There shall be no more than one valid election pro- cedure under this Resolution pursuant to any petition in a 12 onth period affecting the same unit. In the event that the parties are unable to agree on a third party to conduct an election, the election shall be con- ducted by the California State Conciliation Service. Costs of conducting elections shall be borne in equal shares by the City and by each employee organization appearing on the ballot. Section 8. Procedure for Decertification of Recognized Employee Organization A Decertification Petition alleging that the incumbent Recognized Employee Organization no longer represents a majority of the employees in an established appropriate unit may be filed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 with the Employee Relations Officer only during the thirty (30) day period commencing one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the termination date of a Memorandum of Understanding. A Decer- tification Petition may be filed by two or more employees or their representative, or an employee organization, and shall con- tain the following information and documentation declared by the duly authorized signatory under penalty of perjury to be true, correct and complete: A. The name, address and telephone number of the petitioner and a designated representative authorized to receive notices or requests for further information. B. The name of the established appropriate unit and of the incumbent Recognized Employee Organization sought to be de- certified as the representative of that unit. • C. An allegation that the incumbent Recognized Em- ployee Organization no longer represents a majority of the em- ployees in an appropriate unit, and any other relevant and material facts relating thereto. D. Proof of employee support that at least thirty (30) percent of the employees in the established appropriate unit no longer desire to be represented by the incumbent Recognized Em- ployee Organization and such proof shall be submitted for confir- mation to the Employee Relations Officer or toa mutually agreed upon disinterested third party within time limits specified in the first paragraph of this Section 8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 An employee organization may, in satisfaction of the Decertification Petition requirements hereunder, file a Petition under this section in the form:. of a Recognition Petition that evidences proof of employee support of at least thirty (30) per- cent and otherwise conforms to the requirements of Section 4 of this Article. The Employee Relations Officer shall initially deter- mine whether the Petition has been filed in compliance with the applicable provisions of this Article II. If the determination is in the negative, he/she shall offer to consult thereon with the representative(s) of such petitioning employees or employee organization and, if such determination thereafter remains un- changed, shall return such Petition to the employees or employee organization with a statement of the reasons therefore in writ- ing. The petitioning employees or employee organization may ap- peal such determination in accordance with Section 11 of this Article. If the determination of the Employee Relations Officer is in the affirmative, or if his/her negative determination is reversed on appeal, he/she shall give written notice of such De- certification or Recognition Petition to the incumbent Recognized Employee Organization and to unit employees. The Employee Relations Officer shall thereupon arrange for a secret ballot election to be held on or about fifteen (15) days after such notice to determine the wishes of unit employees as to the question of decertification and if a Recognition Peti- tion was duly filed hereunder, the question of representation. Such election shall be conducted in conformance with Section 7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 During the "Open Period" specified in the first para- graph of this Section 8, the Employee Relations Officer may on his/her own motion, when he/she has reason to believe that a majority of unit employees no longer wish to be represented by the incumbent Recognized Employee Organization, give notice to that organization and all units employees that he/she will ar- range for an election to determine that issue. In such event, any other employee organization may within fifteen (15) days of such notice file a Recognition Petition in accordance with this Section 8, which the Employee Relations Officer shall act on in accordance with this Section 8. If pursuant to this Section 8, a different employee organization is formally acknowledged as the Recognized Employee Organization, such organization shall be bound by all the terms and conditions of any Memorandum of Understanding then in effect for its remaining term. Section 9. POLICY AND STANDARDS FOR DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE UNITS. The policy objectives in determining the appropriate- ness of units shall be the effect of a proposed unit on (1) the efficient operations of the City and its compatibility with the primary responsibilty of the City and its employees to effective- ly and economically serve the public, and (2) providing employees with effective representation based on recognized community of interest considerations. These policy objectives require that the appropriate unit shall be the broadest feasible grouping of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 positions that share an identifiable community of interest. Fac- tors to be considered shall be: A. Similarity of the general kinds of work performed, types of qualifications required, and the general working conditions. B. History of representation in the City and similar employment; except however, that no unit shall be deemed to be an appropriate unit solely on the basis of the extent to which em- ployees in the proposed unit have organized. C. Consistency with the organizational patterns of the City. D. Number of employees and classifications, and the effect on the administration of employer-employee relations cre- ated by the fragmentation of classifications and proliferation of units. E. Effect on the classification structure and impact on the stability of the employer-employee relationship of divid- ing a single or related classifications among two or more units. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section, man- agerial, administrative, supervisory and confidential respon- sibilities, as defined in Sec.2 of this Resolution, are determin- ing factors in establishing appropriate units hereunder, and therefore such managerial, administrative, supervisory and con- fidential employees may only be included in units consisting solely of managerial, administrative, supervisory or confidential employees. The Employee Relations Officer shall, after notice to and consultation with affected employee organizations, allocate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 new classifications or positions, delete eliminated classifica- tions or positions, and retain, reallocate or delete modified classifications or positions from units in accordance with the provisions of this Section 9. Section 10. PROCEDURE FOR MODIFICATIONS OF ESTABLISHED APPROPRIATE UNITS. Requests by employee organizations for modifications of established appropriate units may be considered by the Employee Relations Officer only during the period specified in Section 8. Such requests shall be submitted in the form of a Recognition Petition and, in addition to the requirements set forth in Sec- tion 4, shall contain a complete statement of all relevant facts and citations in support of the proposed modified unit in terms of the policies and standards set forth in Section 9 hereof. ,The Employee Relations Officer shall process such petitions as other Recognition Petitions under this Article II. The Employees Relations Officer may on his/her own mo- tion propose during the period specified in Section 8 that an established unit be modified. The Employee Relations Officer shall give written notice of the proposed modification(s) to any affected employee organization and shall hold a meeting concern- ing the proposed modification(s), at which time all affected em- ployee organizations shall be heard. Thereafter the Employee Relations Officer shall determine the composition of the ap- propriate unit or units in accordance with Section 9, and shall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 give written notice of such determination to the affected em- ployee organizations. If a unit is modified pursuant to the mo- tion of the Employee Relations Officer hereunder, employee or- ganizations may thereafter file Recognition Petitions seeking to become the Recognized Employee Organization for such new ap- propriate unit or units pursuant to Section 4 hereof. Section 11. APPEALS An employee organization aggrieved by an appropriate unit determination (Section 9), or a modification of established appropriate units (Section 10) by the Employee Relations Officer under this Article II may, within fifteen (15) days of notice thereof, request the intervention of the California State Con- ciliation Service pursuant to Government Code Sections 3507.1 and 3507.3 (as amended), or may in lieu thereof or thereafter file an appeal of such determination to the City Council for final deci- sion within fifteen (15) days of notice of the Employee Relations Officer's determination or the termination of proceedings, whichever is later, pursuant to Government Code Sections 3507.1 and 3307.3 (as amended). An employee organization aggrieved by a determination of the Employee Relations Officer that a Recognition Petition (Section 4), Challenging Petition (section 6) or Decertification of Recognition Petition (Section 8) - or employees aggrieved by a determination of the Employee Relations Officer that a Decer- tification Petition ( Section 8) has not been filed in compliance with the applicable provisions of this Article - may, within fif- teen (15) days of such determination, file an appeal of the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 determination to the City Council for final decisions. Appeals to the City Council shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk, and a copy thereof served on the Employee Relations Officer. The City Council shall commence to consider the matter within thirty (30) days of the filing of the appeal. The City Council may, in its discretion, refer their dispute to a third party hearing process. Any decision of the City Council on the use of such procedure, and/or any decision of the City Coun- cil determining the substance of the dispute shall be final and binding. ARTICLE III - ADMINISTRATION Section 12. SUBMISSION OF CURRENT INFORMATION BY RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS All changes in the information filed with the City by a Recognized Employee Organization under items (a) through (h) of its Recognition Petition under Section 4 of this Resolution shall be submitted in writing to the Employee Relations Officer within fifteen (15) days of such change. Section 13. PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS ON BEHALF OF EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS Upon formal acknowledgement by the City of a Recognized Employee Organization under this Resolution, only such Recognized Employee Organization may be provided payroll deductions of mem- bership dues and insurance premiums for plans sponsored by such organization upon the written authorization of employees in the unit represented by the Recognized Employee Organization on the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 forms provided therefore by the City. The providing of such ser- vice to the Recognized Employee Organization by the City shall be contingent upon and in accordance with the provisions of Memoran- dum of Understanding and/or applicable administrative procedures. Section 14. EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION ACTIVITIES - USE OF CITY RESOURCES Access to City work locations and the use of the City paid time, facilities, equipment and other resources by employee organizations and those representing them shall be authorized only to the extent provided for in Memorandum of Understanding and/or administrative procedures, shall be limited to lawful ac- tivities consistent with the provisions of this Resolution that pertain directly to the employer-employee relationship and not such internal employee organization business as soliciting mem- ► bership, campaigning for office, and organization meetings and elections, and shall not interfere with the efficiency, safety and security of City operations. Section 15. ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND PROCEDURES The City Manager is hereby authorized to establish such rules and procedures as appropriate to implement and administer the provisions of this Resolution after consultation with af- fected employee organizations. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Article IV - IMPASSE PROCEDURES Section 16. INITIATION OF IMPASSE PROCEDURES If the meet and confer process has reached impasse as defined in this Resolution, either party may initiate the impasse procedures by filing with the other party a written request for an impasse meeting, together with a statement of its position on all issues. An impasse meeting shall then be scheduled promptly by the Employee Relations Officer. The purpose of such meeting shall be: a. To review the position of the parties in a final effort to reach agreement on a Memorandum of Understanding; and b. If the impasse is not resolved, to discuss arrange- ments for the utilization of the impasse procedures provided herein. Section 17. IMPASSE PROCEDURES Impasse procedures are as follows: a. If the parties agree to submit the dispute to mediation, and agree on the selection of a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to mediation. The mediator shall make no public recommendation, nor take any public position at any time concerning the issues. The mediator shall be a member of the State of California Mediation Services. b. If the parties fail to agree to submit the dispute to mediation or failed to agree on the selection of a mediator, or failed to resolve the dispute through mediation within fifteen (15) days after the mediator commenced meeting with the parties, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the issue shall be submitted to the City Council. The City Coun- cil may take such action regarding the impasse as it in its dis- cretion deems appropriate as in the public interest. Any legis- lative action by the City Council on the impasse shall be final and binding. Section 18. COSTS OF IMPASSE PROCEDURES The costs for the services of a mediator, and other mutually incurred costs of mediation,shall be borne equally by the City and the Recognized Employee Organization. ARTICLE V - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Section 19. CONSTRUCTION This Resolution shall be administered and construed as follows: A. Nothing in this Resolution shall be construed to deny to any person, employee, organization, the City, or any au- thorized officer, body or other representative of the City, the rights, powers and authority granted by Federal or State law or the provisions of the Municipal Code. B. This Resolution shall be interpreted so as to carry out its purposes as set forth in Section 1. Section 20. SEVERABILITY If any provisions of this Resolution, or the applica- tion of such provision to any persons or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this Resolution, or the applica- tion of such provision to persons or circumstances other than 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 198 . PRESIDENT of the city Council; and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney November 1, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council November 14, 1989 NAMING OF GREENBELT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council select a name for the City's about to be acquired greenbelt from the list submitted by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission (shown in the analysis below). BACKGROUND At the City Council meeting of January 24, 1989, the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission was directed to agendize the issue of naming the Railroad Right -of -Way (Greenbelt) using the same procedure as they did for Edith Rodaway Friendship Park (name that park contest). At the June 28, 1989, Commission meeting, a "Name That Greenbelt" contest to take place in September and October was approved. Staff advertised this contest in the Fall Recreation Brochure (mailed to all residents) and in local papers. Hermosa Beach residents were asked to submit names for the City's newest parkland. Eighty-one (81) entries were received by the stated October 16, 1989 deadline. At their October 25, 1989, meeting the Commission reviewed the entries and selected four names for Council consideration. ANALYSIS The Commission selected the four names listed below for submittal to Council. They are listed in order of preference (as voted on by the Commission). Some residents submitted a reason for their name selection. IQX7 First Choice: Hermosayl1 Parkway "Because the area is a nice parkway running through town." Second Choice: Valley Greenbelt Third Choice: Santa Fe Trail Fourth Choice: Paseo Verde "It means 'Green Walk' in Spanish, sounds elegant and fits well with 'Hermosa' also Spanish name." Council is requested to adopt a name from this list. Attached are all the names submitted. Respectfully submitted, Concur: af-ee Alana Mastrian-Handman Director Dept. of Community Resources evin B. North' aft City Manager 2 Mary '. ooney, Coordinator Dept Community Resources "NAME YOUR GREENBELT" LIST *HERMOSA PARKWAY FEELING GREEN .. *HARMONY PARK HERMOSA BEACH PARKWAY LORETO PARK HERMOSA VALLEY PARKWAY *HERMOSA PEACE PARKWAY *HERMOSA PEACE GREENWAY GREEN CLOUD PARK *LA HERMOSA VERDE CH00 CH00 PARK *WORLD PEACE PARK GREENBACK THE EMO SANTA FE TRAIL FUNRUN HERMOSA PURCHASE PEOPLES WAY PARK WEST OUR WAY GLEN. HAVEN EASY STREET SCENIC WALK MIDDLE ROAD VALLEY WALK WAY CENTER PARK WEST VALLEY PARKWAY HERMOSA GREEN STRIP SANTA FE FREE STYLE AISLE *EL CINTO VERDE *LA ZONA VERDE *PARQUE CINTO VERDE *PARQUE ZONA VERDE GREEN BELTWAY VERDANT SCREENERY STROLLING GREEN SERENE COMMONS 'BURBANITY PAUSE *THE SUNSET STRIP *SEE ATTACHED EXPLANATIONS HERMOSA VALLEY PARKWAY *GAZIN PARK *THE EARTHWALK VALLEY -RAIL PARK EVER GREEN WAY HERMOSA COASTAL GARDENS & PATHWAYS THE HERMOSA GREENBELT THE FAST LANE OF THE HIP STRIP EMERALD WAY PARK VALLEYGREEN JARVIS BELT GREENBELT PARK VIA VERDE *CENTRAL PARK CENTER WOODS SUN VALLEY *SYNERGY STRIP *THE GREENBELT PARK WOODS MERRY MESA CENTRAL KNOLL *HERMOSA TRAILS PARK PLEASURE MOUNT FREEDOM TRAIL *LA SENDA VERDE *VIA SENDA VERDE *VIA LA SENDA VERDE *GREENBELT CAMINO VERDE HERMOSA GREENS HERMOSA COMMUNITY PARK FRIENDLY PATHSUASION GALLOPING WAY VALLEY GREEN VALLEY GREENBELT HAPPYTOWN TRAIL WAVE LENGTH GREENS PATH OF TRANQUILLITY JACK WOODS WALK *(EL) CAMINO VERDE '(EL) PASEO VERDE t5,Zehri-Pvg-d-1 01) 1A-elf/J7f.ed-ev,-/ 4/ 1/ ,•••• smoir• IISM.• .11=1, • •.• ok.• • • —77' • • • -;.:. • • "1 would like to name the Greenbelt: - • . — • At • 0%.?ItYs BeCaUSe15,4.A.: •." • .• . . . *-* - • ••• s- • "I would' like t� - e tne-olAr 11P Wo1-• Sum - %Pe . ae9.ro .focAr5 .0 tit kp-• Se ause.•,zericz., .140 so .114 Ir.. 4. • too 13 • :„ 4-; • .• • • • . *: : • Becauser??...-...:— es •• f • -• • .... 4=1, ..1•101.:. 11Nm. • ,4..? :'?•• would like toname the..Greenbelt:l. • .•-- .t1r4. "ay.ii:14.;..ieziint• Ai lharj..,'z..,' ----.....--.,,:4...: -, • Becatise:3 ‘••., t -s-...,,,-24.0..1.4- - -"-Z---' .r, ,..;,.....-.:......v.- ,,..i '41147 'I'll: 1 ti ---:•‘1',....1#t-4,•.: ...., A ..., ....cc,. -,:-. — . &•• ' . .-, ._: • *.r.119% • A.V:::'1;: • ,311111-10.tZ41.X. 5Shrir'ver-i-alSadelt 0-11) ,etad.09 •••••••••••••••••....m..........11.0,4,. .,11=4.•41.• It Because • "I wouldlike to ip e 1,eir al;; -ro focArS o tik to.",%1•1;) Be ause:,?c ric6„.t..10 So 1-14 V' al. • ,01PF .• Fr e;n7to er 6 C'ree/1/13e/.14 14- Zo'vi - Vertie " . rL 1 If/ ,1(/ Z0,4A-VA,Wevt, IP "I would like to name the Greenbelt----w---r Because. . s _as jr : 7 ; . a'- 16C& W%*V- veal 5 ' -.. p 'To� V ice• • c 1 "OAC(= Iwould like to name the Greenbellt: " GAtl N PARI." IN - -_ NOP— aF !ERMQSA_S F/PST WoMANVWNO H b } •'i'/�£ E SICK T TO BEGIN LMI D 3CAPING OF .rPp•►trget e e1 g ' tober " " • +-!�._ = • r"l would like to no. the Greenbelt: a --', :71 lam_ n rL . Because:5-, • • s• , t,€z s p N 14'x ,� *t?. iy •„' :rj i : �•� s:.'L� v`l: `- -4�.i` -'J ct7j4 .. esources ratfi 254 t /%'_ /� idzo ! 11318-0280Aif—. �rt tf ,,,,. p- 41 I .w••vitwi••vr • would like, to name the Greenbelt: SL,) e.r-c7 Lt. •=1 r Because: ”: .,-.• • , .....,:`,11,.t;,';..'•.::' p9c4 Q9 '* Jo.tt €o9. 1ti,7_st t'f, f n'ch cl e n it % e ...:._.4..',: - r,, . -_ .. • •1. "I would like to: name the Greenbelt: Because: '. QM:: N Anr11N6, RfilLgorl glGtfT a Dili lime-- 6- P/ Sr Np r6-bacn NAME 8srAss, to �t �S'b ��''' i7F$ t6� ` Amr TXT /S S/L� } 786 1 S1�D�`�� � o 6-s Sovric CLu `T D 04-04-gN.� PSK /r ts, �' --�'', S�Tfrd �Nb ALSO • b�� cS S T%►t"; Fr(?.. w u"S� �(N�'� H(.iS SUGGb / w0 11 • ,r /L -tz ✓h osR -7P A/L.S fegr Wou d c) u LA -./.1 /-4 SffivIDA V5,21D. 3 V/1i LA CCN bA IJEkOE i,. 2 13y 1//F 6'eA/ 3 &y/ war GP- 051,,1 r,tH Vt1"- k DE -- -)-HE. 6--2C-="5 V/1 y ----- V)Ay_ of 4A - e to name the Greenbelt: e—e/06 ELT Afro p M All entries ut S L • i; tr Yms!-j received by October "I would like to name the Greenbelt.. . ii ft Because:, : nd zguld Nora 0242.0 r October 18, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of October 24, 1989 RECOMMENDATION REGARDING POSSIBLE REORGANIZATION OF THE GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND CODE ENFORCEMENT Recommendation: That the City Council authorize staff to: 1. Recruit for the position of General Services Director, em- phasizing data processing background, and 2. Continue with plans to locate all parking personnel and data processing major equipment in the same respective facili- ties, and expand functional coordination of code enforcement and data processing throughout the City organization. Background: The retirement of Joan Noon, our General Services Director, com- bined with the City Goal to review organizational effectiveness, resulted in the formation last spring of an employees' task force on possible reorganizations. Two principal areas were reviewed - 1) as General Services was partially formed over the years be- cause of Mrs. Noon's abilities, the major effort concerned pos- sible reorganizations/dissolution of this department, and 2) the growing arena of code enforcement was reviewed to improve effec- tiveness and efficiency of our many efforts. These are complex issues, with which I have grappled with dif- ficulty, as did the task force. While the task force developed optional recommendations, obviously it was necessary to resolve those into a single plan of action. The task force recommenda- tions are attached. Other background materials are available in the City Clerk's office. General Services While there are a whole host of issues involving the possibility of a major reorganization, the two major options suggested by the task force were either a major change and virtual elimination of the department, or a much more minor change and retention of the General Services Director position. The potential advantages of a major change would be the possibility of increased efficiency and one less department head reporting to the City Manager. The potential disadvantages are the obvious disruption of routine that would occur by a reorganization, the potential negative ef- fect on morale due to the uncertainty and change of job duties and reporting responsibilities, and the possibility that the change will not result in any increased efficiency or effectiveness. Since some reorganization recommendations entail additional responsibilities being assigned to the Public Safety Department, these facts were of concern: 1) this is already the department of broadest span of control, and 2) the department currently is .undertaking a program to develop greater productivity and respon- siveness. An impact such as adding a large division to the department at this time could disrupt the positive trend that is under way. Finally, the emphasis needed to alter almost every departments' operations would divert us from the goals of the Council that more directly affect public services. For these reasons, I feel that the. organization would be best served by retaining the General Services Director's position and the department. While it is possible that changes could improve the operation marginally, the cliche that "If it ain't broken, don't fix it" probably applies. Indeed, some of the possible changes and reorganization would be to go back to ways that ser- vices were provided previously and found not successful. However, there are several more minor changes recommended by the task force that I feel would be appropriate. I think Parking Enforcement should be centralized in Base 3 on an interim basis. It is hoped that if we move the City Yard or build a structure on Bard Street in the future, then these offices could be brought closer to City Hall. This would also free up space for consolidation of data process- ing in our basement. While direct supervision of the Police Department data processing would continue by the Public Safety Director, consolidating should increase functional coordination between the major data processing operations going on in our Police and General Services Departments. It is hoped that the supervisors of those operations will work closely together and be cross -trained to provide better coverage to the City. Hopefully, there will be room also to provide Planning some additional space. To give data processing its recognized role as the complex future oriented topic, the new General Services Director should be re- cruited with an emphasis on data processing background, as well as supervisory and administrative skills. If we are unsuccessful in obtaining this type of person, then there is a possibility of hiring someone with more supervisory administrative skills, and contracting out for the data processing help on a consulting basis. The recommendation to change the title of General Services Of- ficer to Community Services seems to have merit. It may be necessary to convert the Community Resources Department name back to Recreation, Park and Community Resources to avoid confusion if this change is implemented. Code Enforcement Regarding code enforcement, there are again advantages and disad- vantages to consolidating the code enforcement areas in our City. A major concern to reorganization is the detrimental interim ef- fects on: 1) current personnel, and 2) the building effectiveness of our current efforts (especially conditional use permit en- forcement). Before making such a major step, I think it is ad- visable to see how we might improve the functional coordination of code enforcement by the many departments and personnel devoted to this activity. This will be done via meetings of line person- nel, and new forms and procedures over the next six months. While this recommendation would result in only minor changes from the eight month study, those changes are the product of a multi- tude of employee input and judged to have a high potential for benefits far exceeding costs. I would like to thank publicly the task force members for their contributions. They are Anthony Antich, Mary Fehskens, Michael Flaherty, Marcia Hite, Melvin Lee, Michael Schubach, Merelyn Vanola, and Steve Wisniewski. KBN/ld CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager FROM: Anthony Antich, Task Force Committee Chairman SUBJECT: Staff Review Committee Recommendations DATE: June 28, 1989 COMMENTS FROM THE CHAIRMAN After several meetings the General Services Task Force has reached a concenus of opinion. Although there is not a 100% agreement on each and every issue, there is agreement on identified organizational needs to better serve the residents of Hermosa Beach. The changes seem to meet with approval of committee members (some of which may benefit). It is my opinion that the recommendations may not be as objective as was hoped at the start of the process. As chairman, I believe and recommend that an economic analysis of each of the task force recommendations be performed to identify true cost savings or expense to the total city budget. BACKGROUND With the pending retirement of General Services Director Joan Noon, reorganization of the General Services Department may be in order. A General Services Task Force Committee was appointed by the City Manager with the goal of reviewing the functions of the General Services Department and making appropriate recommendations. The committee was also responsible for determining whether there is a need for enhancing and improving code enforcement. The committee consisted of the following staff: Anthony Antich, Director (Chair), Public Works *Mary Fehskens, Business License Inspector, Building Department *Michael Flaherty, Leadman, Public Works Department Marcia Hite, Citation Records Administrator, General Services Department Melvin Lee, Supervisor, General Services Department Michael Schubach, Director, Planning Department Merelyn Vanole, Administrative Aide, Public Works Department Steve Wisnewski, Director, Public Safety * Two Teamsters Local 911 representatives participated in the discussions. CALENDAR The committee meet between April 11, 1989 and June 28, 1989. There have been eleven meetings during that time. WEEKLY AGENDAS The committee discussed the reorganization and the agendas have ranged from each member offering their views and ideas to charting the pros and cons of the ideas presented. In addition, members of the committee surveyed many of the surrounding South Bay cities, Torrance, Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach and El Segundo, to find where their parking enforcement, animal control, and code enforcement divisions were located. The committee received ideas from interested General Services employees. During the past two weeks, we have fine tuned the recommendations and received comments from all Department Heads, including the City Manager. RECOMMENDATION The committee recommendations and the City Manager and Department Head's comments are attached. In addition, a copy of the Task Force notebook will be available for review in the City Clerk's office. Listed below are recommendations prepared by the General Service Task Force Committee. There is no majority nor minority recommendation. The Committee agreed not to make a single recommendation, but to offer several viable alternatives. This in no way suggests that 50% favor Alternative #1 and 50% favor Alternative #2, or Alternative 3. OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS IN RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT HEAD COMMENTS: - Implement Space Allocation Study - Subsequent brain storming and further fine tuning. - Examine remote cash receipt site, per Viki's comment ALTERNATIVE NO. 1 GENERAL SERVICE DIRECTOR Recommendation is to hire a new Director for the General Services Department - open, competitive examination. DATA PROCESSING RECOMMENDATION General Recommendation: --It is recommended that Data Processing be separated from General Services. It was originally recommended that Data Processing be under the direction of the City Manager. However, Michael Schubach, Planning Director, has volunteered for this division of General Services to be his responsibility. Other possibilities include: 1) Finance Department 2) Personnel Department, or 3) the Assistant City Manager. Specific Recommendation: --Data Processing would remain in the basement, but by relocating the balance of the General Service Department to Base 3 additional space would be gained not only for the expansion of Data Processing, but also allow for expansion of the Planning Department. It is additionally recommended that telephone services be removed from General Services and become a part of Data Processing. In addition, it is recommended that a programmer and a part time data entry clerk be added to staff. Planning Department Expansion: --The Planning Department is in need of more space because of an increase in employees. Another 300 to 400 square feet is needed. A portion of the General Service Department could easily be utilized via relocation of one wall to accomodate the departments' space needs. The existing basement area is poorly laid out and is being under utilized. Several building improvements installed many years ago do not meet present day codes; i.e. hall widths, air circulation, etc. As the computer system grows or changes, improvements are needed. The computer room in General Services and the computer room in the Police Department could be consolidated. Listed below are some concerns: Computer Room in G. S. Computer Room in P. D. 1. No back up air conditioning 1. system 2. 3. No training area 4. Area is crowded. 2. Very little work ,area and poor accessibility. 5. False floor needed for cables & wires. Vital emergencies equipment located beneath water pipes. A break could disrupt communications. One operator doing back up for both computer systems. GENERAL SERVICES RELOCATION RECOMMENDATION It is the desire of the committee to have the entire Parking/Animal Control/Records Division be located within one building. This can be accomplished by re -doing "Base 3", located at 1035 Valley Drive. The building would be required to accomodate the following staff and vehicles: Staff: 1 Director 3 Administrative 4 Supervisory 4.5 Office personnel 11 Officers 1 Meter Maintenance Specialist It is estimated that the entire project could be soon as one year. Vehicles: 12 Cushmans 3 Sedans 2 A/C Trucks 1 Meter Maint. The committee feels that the construction can be through the sale of the garages on Bard Street. With the relocation we would be better able to serve the public. Presently, a citizen may have to go to as many as three different offices in order to purchase a parking permit. With the installation of a cash register a person will be able to purchase a parking permit, pay outstanding citations and view copies of their citations without leaving the premises. accomplished as financed in part ALTERNATIVE NO. 2 Alternative recommendation is to abolish the General Services Department and the position of Director in order to unify all City enforcement related activities and to reduce the cost for providing those activities. This goal would be accomplished in the following manner: Move the data processing/computer/telephone functions and responsibilities as mentioned previously. Additionally, it is recommended that the Cable Television and RTD pass functions and responsibilities be moved to Community Resources. The remaining functions and responsibilities of the General Service Department; Animal Control, Parking, VPD, Crossing Guards, Meters, Citations, and Records, would then be placed with the Police Department. The current organization of the Department would remain intact with two exceptions...the Citation and Record Administrator and the Administrative Aide would report to the Coordinator. The Coordinator would report directly to the Director of Public Safety. (Proposed organizational chart is shown below). PROPOSED ORGANIZATION OF THE GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATOR I ADMIN. AIDE I ICITATION I REC. ADMIN. SUPERVISORS ( I METER SPECIALIST OFFICERS I METER I ICROSSING I SPECIALIST GUARDS TECH. I AIDES The relocation/remodel recommendations mentioned earlier in this report are included with this recommendation. During the short term, all existing office spaces, uses, etc. would remain as is. The long term goal would be to renovate Base 3 as mentioned in order to house all of the Animal Control and Parking Enforcement functions at a central location so a citizen using the services would be able to take care of all business at the same place. It has been suggested that the title "General Services Officer" could be changed to "Community Services Officer". It was also suggested that a uniform change be made. The classification "Community Services Officer" could expand the duties of existing General Services Officers. Concepts such as report taking, uniform changes could be melded into promotional opportunities. The final determination should be left to the department head and union. CODE ENFORCEMENT RECOMMENDATION General Recommendation: --Under the direction of the Police Department, create a Code Enforcement unit reporting to a Police Commander and staff the unit with two personnel under a new classification called Code Enforcement Officer. This unit would be responsible for enforcement/coordination of enforcement of all municipal code violations such as weed abatement, abandoned vehicles, business license, posting regulations for liquor establishments, handbills, etc. Note: A complete list needs to be prepared to avoid confusion. Specific Recommendation: --The long term plan would be to provide code enforcement office space in the basement of the Police Department. The unit would be staffed with two employees and would be supported by the Fire Department Clerk Typist. The Clerk Typist would be the central receiving point for all incoming phone calls and counter needs for business license. Utilizing this Clerk Typist eliminates the need to fill a current vacant position to support business license. The Code Enforcement Officers would be non -sworn employees and would not wear uniforms. They would receive required training to enable them to issue citations for violations. The unit would require two vehicles to allow the officers to do the required field work. In order to start the unit, the current Business License Inspector, would be tested and reclassified under proper Civil Service procedures and assigned as a Code Enforcement Officer. The Business License Inspector position would then be eliminated because Code Enforcement would encompass all of the business license duties. Temporary work stations would be established in the Fire Department pending some reallocation of space in the Police Department and the unitcwouldbegin operation almost immediately. The second Code Enforcement Officer could be employed as soon as possible because of the savings gained from not filling the vacant Clerk Typist position that would be eliminated. Once the two officers were in place, a split 4-10 schedule would be implemented with one officer wotking Monday -Thursday and one working Tuesday -Friday. This would allow better coverage for enforcement and more responsiveness to the needs of the community. The office space in the Police Department would be prepared and provided as soon as possible during a planned reallocation of the various existing offices. Additional Comment: --With the removal of two desks from the Building Department (i.e., business license space) Public Works Department would be allowed to expand and gain some much needed space with the additional personnel being hired. ALTERNATIVE 3. Leave the General Services Department "as is". Recruit for new Director through open competitive exam. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Anthony Antich, Task Force Chairman FROM: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager DATE: June 21, 1989 I have many comments that I'll defer until the report is finalized, but wanted to ask you some specific questions: All answers provided by the committee. 1. Is there any cost guesstimate for Base 3 rehab.? Answer: See Bill Grove's memo. 2. If Parking goes to Public Safety, couldn't function be under one of four commanders? Answer: The committee feels that under the current structure, it would be best for the Coordinator to report directly to the Public Safety Director. 3. What's plan for vacated basement area? Answer: Storage of paper products; expansion of computer room; possible relocation of other department; centralized computer location; media center for photocopying, blueprinting, machine paper products. 4. Re: new code enforcement unit, why wouldn't bootleg officer, Planning C.U.P. enforcement officer be included. Answer: It wasn't considered by the committee, but may be possible. 5. How would Fire Dept. weed abatement and other code enforcement be coordinated with new unit? Answer: Same as all other problems. 6. Any thought to put code enforcement unit in Building. Answer: It wasn't considered by the committee, but possible. No outlined plan as of this date pending the decision of General Services Department, Any change would not occur immediately but would require several months to implement. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Anthony Antich, Director of Public Works FROM: William Grove, Director of Building & Safety SUBJECT: General Services Task Force DATE: June 26, 1989 Per your request, I have the following comments regarding the General Services Task Force recommendations: 1. DATA PROCESSING I see no rationale for separating data processing from General Services and placing it with an operating department such as Planning. If General Services is to be soley parking enforcement and animal control it would seem appropriate that Data Processing be part of an administrative department such as Finance. Admittedly, I am unaware of all of data processing functions; however, is an additional programmer necessary given the availability of ready made software and support resources? A data entry clerk would be valuable if available to all departments for use. 2. GENERAL SERVICES RELOCATION This relocation sounds like a good idea. I don't think the existing building is well suited for "re -doing" to accomodate personnel and vehicles. The building is forty years old and should probably be replaced with a new building meeting the space needs. 3. CODE ENFORCEMENT While I favor the creation of a code enforcement unit and believe it appropriately should be under the Police Department, I have several concerns regarding the recommendation. Business Licensing is for revenue purposes and is not a regulatory process. Obviously, in cooperation with other departments, licenses are not issued where the use is not allowed pursuant to other regulations (zoning, etc.). Since the Building Department enforces the zoning regulations, having Business License located in this department has worked well for that cooperative effort. Also it is very common for contractors to obtain or renew a business license prior to obtaining a permit. It was very inconvenient for this purpose when the function was previously located in the Fire Department. The support proposed for code enforcement and business license (the Fire Department Clerk Typist) is inadequate. Unless that position is currently doing nothing, it will not be possible to add the volumnious business license clerical functions and the clerical functions to support code enforcement. Code enforcement traditionally results in significant amount of correspondence, reports, etc. The proximity of the Fire Department Clerk Typist to employees located in the Police Department basement also does not work well. Clerical support for code enforcement officers should be in close proximity for obvious reasons. Code enforcement issues that were not addressed in your recommendation include zoning, housing, sanitation and signs. These issues are currently enforced by my department and I am unsure how the recommendation will effect that process. I believe a more definitive code enforcement plan including processes for interdeparmental cooperation is needed before a decision can be made. This recommendation also indicates that current a vacant position in my department should not be filled. Since there is an available list for the position, I am not anxious to leave the position vacant if this issue will not be decided for several months. Business license has already suffered through six months of half staffing. 4. SPACE ALLOCATION I appreciate the desire of departments who acquire more personnel to expand their facilitates. The Building Department accepted the two positions of the Business License division several years ago without receiving any additional space and have suffered with cramped conditions since. If those two positions are relocated, no additional space will be available to other departments since the area is needed to relieve current cramped conditions and provide adequate work space. This position is supported by the space allocation study. Once again, it seems that department expansions are contemplated without regard to the overall city hall conditions as indicated in the space allocation study. How about addressing the space need of all departments without departments pushing and shoving against each other. William Grove Director of Building & Safety cc: K. B. Northcraft, City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Anthony Antich, Task Force Chairman FROM: Viki Copeland, Finance Administrator RE: Task Force Recommendation DATE: June 27, 1989 Concerns regarding the task force recommendation: The Planning Department has a heavy workload. Taking on the additional responsibility of Data Processing at this time does not seem wise. The financial impact of any recommendation needs to be determined. Several additional personnnel and many other changes are being proposed without evaluation of the resources required to make these changes or the impact fiscally on the organization. The recommendation to expand the duties for receipt of cash payments at Base 3 necessitates an examination of internal accounting controls and may shift repsonsibility for cash deposits. Payment of parking citations is currently the responsibility of the Finance Department. The recommendation does not discuss the shift in responsibility from Finance to Base 3 or the personnel changes that might be made as a result of this change. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Anthony Antich, Task Force Chairman FROM: Alana Mastrian, Community Services Director R$: General Services Department Reorganization ***************************************************************** I have read the attached and have many concerns, the first being my department has no interest in taking over Cable T.V. and R.T.D. Bus Passes. We are understaffed as is. I also have grave cncerns about the cost of what the report is suggesting, the re-assignmentof personnel and the ability of the Planning Department to take on any any more work. Why not just hire another Director through an open competitive exam. C1L. 1V C INV lit • 1L1C. 11LLv'1VJsi uLs1%.4 L L.L\J VLus L. L. L. a..♦ L 11,41L TO: Anthony Antich, General Services Task Force Chairman FROM: Robert Blackwood, Personnel Director Janice Silver, Administrative Aide DATE: June 28, 1989 SUBJECT: General Services Task Force recommendations **************************************************************** The following are comments on the alternate recommendations for dealing with the "future of the General Services Department". Alternate #1 The idea of separating data processing from General Services and, adding computer expertise and staffing is great. Every city department could profoundly benefit by knowledgable utilization of our computerization potential. It seems more appropriate, however, to place the data processing division under the auspices of the Finance Department or Assistant City Manager. Alternate #2 The idea of placing parking enforcement and animal control activities under the Police Department makes sense since they are really enforcement functions. The idea of creating code enforcement officers is excellent. It would streamline and focus building and planning department functions by removing the confusion of miscellaneous complaints withing each department. It would also eliminate the confusion of who is actually responsible for dealing with the complaint. Additioinally, the public would benefit in that one officer would be responsible for handling and/or referring/tracking complaints rather than shuffling the complainant from one department to another. And... Thanks to the Task Force for coming up with two innovative and insightful alternate recommendations. November 7, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of November 14, 1989 SUPPLEMENT TO RECOMMENDATION REGARDING GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT The October 18, 1989 memo, as presented to the City Council for your October 24, 1989 meeting, summarizes the rationale used to reach our conclusions as a result of the eight months' study on possible reorganizations. To summarize the specific conclusions and recommendations, the following determinations are itemized from the October 18, 1989 memo: Staff Recommendations Regarding Reorganization Study 1) Retain the General Services Director and the General Ser- vices Department. 2 3 4 5 6 7 ) ) ) ) ) ) Move all Parking Enforcement operations and personnel to Base 3. Consider a permanent location for these personnel at the new City Yard or perhaps a new building on Bard Street. Consolidate data processing equipment city-wide in the base- ment of City Hall to eliminate existing space and hazard problems. This should also increase the functional coor- dination of the General Services and Public Safety data pro- cessing systems. Expand Planning into a portion of the space vacated by Park- ing personnel in, the basement of City Hall, if possible. Recruit a General Services Director with primary emphasis on data processing skills and experience. Change the General Services Officer title to Community Ser- vices Officer. Increase the functional coordination of code enforcement city-wide by holding joint training meetings of code en- forcement personnel from all departments and develop sys- tems, forms, and procedures that can be used by all departments. evin B Northcliaft City Manager 12 a November 8, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of November 8, 1989 SUB -COMMITTEE REPORT AND RESOLUTION REGARDING CITY MANAGER COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution regarding changes to the current compensation and Em- ployment Agreement for the City Manager. BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting of October 24, 1989, Councilmembers' Chuck Sheldon and Roger Creighton were appointed to a sub- committee to review the current Employment Agreement and compen- sation of the City Manager. Additionally, Councilmembers were requested to complete an evaluation form to evaluate the City Manager's performance for the past year. The results of the evaluation are to be used by the sub -committee as part of their consideration in developing a recommendation for an adjustment to the City Manager's compensation. ANALYSIS: The sub -committee will present their recommendation as to City Manager compensation at the Council meeting of November 14, 1989. The sub -committee met with the City Manager on November 6, 1989 to discuss changes to the current Employment Agreement. At that meeting, the City Manager made the following recommendations which were accepted by the sub -committee to recommend to the City Council. 1. Change the current language of Section 3. Hours or Work to reduce the number of hours allowed for executive leave from the current sixteen (16) hours per month (192 hours annually) to a total of sixty (60) hours per year. This reduction was recommen- ded by the City Manager to make his agreement consistent with what is provided the executive staff (Department Heads). 2. Add language to Section 6. Automobile to make explicit that the City Manager is authorized use of the city automobile pro- vided him for nominal personnel use. This change was recommended by the City Manager to make this provision consistent with I.R.S. provisions. 13 a 3. Amend the language of Section 10. Medical and Insurance Benefits to be consistent with the provisions for this benefit as provided for the executive staff in Resolution No. 89-5289. This change provides for the ability to apply savings from not provid- ing a complete annual physical to payment for a fitness program. All other terms and conditions of the existing employment agree- ment are to remain unchanged. The attached draft resolution ac- complishes the above changes. The resolution will be completed to include the recommendation for compensation following Council action at the November 14th meeting. Respectfully submitted, Noted: Robert A. Blackwood 'Kevin B. Northcraft Personnel Director City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 89-5238 ESTABLISHING CERTAIN CHANGES IN THE SALARY AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR THE CITY MANAGER KEVIN B. NORTHCRAFT EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1990 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 89-5238 was adopted the 28th day of February, 1989 which established salary and other terms and conditions of employment for City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft; and, WHEREAS, the terms and conditions of employment for the City Manager are stated in an Employment Agreement adopted pursuant to Resolution No. 89-5238; and; WHEREAS, the City Council and the City Manager have reviewed and agreed upon certain changes in compensation and other terms and conditions of employment; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the Employment Agreement with Kevin B. Northcraft is amended as follows: A) SECTION 3. HOURS OF WORK is amended to read: "The City Manager shall be allowed sixty (60) hours of executive leave each calendar year in addition to flex time for extraordinary assignments, fixed holidays, vacation, and bereavement leave. Said executive leave does not accumulate or carry over, it must be used each year. Said Executive Leave shall have no monetary value and shall be prorated for partial year's service. B) SECTION 6. AUTOMOBILE is amended to add the following: "Miles for personal use are to be nominal and recorded and reimbursed in accordance with I.R.S. procedures." 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B" C) SECTION 10. MEDICAL AND INSURANCE BENEFITS subsection is amended to read as follows: "The provisions of the Management Resolution (Resolution No. 89-5289), or any subsequent amendment, shall apply as regards to provisions for annual physical examination and fitness program (section 5.1 and 5.2 respectively)." 3. That the salary compensation established by the City Council effective January 1, 1990 shall be an annual amount of to be paid bi-monthly. 4. That all other terms and conditions of employment as described in the Employment Agreement entered into as of the 1st day of February 1989 shall remain unchanged. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; and shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolution of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes at which time same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTEST: day of , 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney 4. .11 November 1989 City Council. Hermosa Beach, CA Dear Neighbors, RECEIVED NOV 131989 r"• 1 am writing'to you concernincu.a proposal <Agenda item 14E) which 1.understand is to be brought before the Council on Tuesday evenir:c, 14 Novernber. The issue is the painting of red curbs on Valley Drive in the vicinity of 24th Street. Several weeks ago my wife, Anna, ca/led and spoke with Mr. Gary Wheaton of the Public Works Department. As a result of her call and of others, Mr. Ed Ruzak, City Traffic Engineer, conducted a survey and submitted a report to Mr. Anthony Anc ich, Director of Public Works. This report is attached and 1 •,request that copies of it be distributed to the Council before the meeting or. 14 November. Since the report was prepared on 15 October, 1989, there has already been one more serious accident at that corner on 1 November (See Hermosa Beach Police Department report of that date, number 89-5419.) On 31 October my wife was nearly hit .at the same intersection. 1 have personally experienced several near collisions at that intersection in the 15 years 1 have lived c.n 24th Street. As you will note in the report, the situation on the corner is this- when cars are parked along Valley Drive on either side of 24th.Street, it; is impossible to see oncoming traffic from either direction un•tirl..one has pulled out into the intersection, and if cars are coming too fast, x collis•ior: is likely.. ;r: recent weeks there has also been a large truck with a boat (approximately 25 feet long) and trailer frequently parked on Valley just north of 24th Street which completely obscured the view of oncoming traffic. Some residents of 24th Street are so afraid of the intersection that they cut across Power from 24th to 21st Street so that they can enter or: Valley where there is a stop sign on Valley. AP - There is also a prablem'at that corner which aggravates the traffic situation and that i s cars .parked .ed on 24th Street very close to Valley, As the street is rather narrow at that point, the congestaun makes it difficult to yet in and out of 24th St rent . endorse -the recommendation of Mr. Ruzak that the curbs be painted red' on Valley and parking be restricted on 24th Street r:ear the corner and urge the council to approve this .measure. 1 a;:3 also urging my neighbors to attend the council meeting. Would ycu please consider advancing the agenda item,to SUPPLEMENTAL 1 ,:::INFORMATION • cc.r .3 .ii ,.nu ev n.ne n{J ;lay ...}t have to t'la , — — G _.'C:. Vit. L -vi ,. 1':.s ct', C:','GI "1 s_ ,l.s iiia!":::@1'' NI ii.Lro Ll rs on Y.:Ieii' .'l• cen+ 'e..ect:.on. S7 nce±^_'.y, _Lev 2,, 24.;.1 Street rice. 0_1Lza 3i_. cM, OA 30:254 tOti.. eezig_ ! 6-4 4- 3 (9— z ILA 5r 503 °'•1- - j/N X30 460 04/77-/-51 4 yzq—zct �T H 503 co(, &taut aitirA '0-9- .204 - F #6td-d zi P74 -g g ix7,4.;atAe 5a3- .Y4 1L 5 ikS- 2,4 ''''' .!L --7/7 ,.. /..)Y ` —r- fier.x.,0(im da0.4__rz 1.,1-1Ag\itt_t_ Sze Zwr4+ 51 . era- -1-t- C,4 , .. ,I/ a� M &/ cod -S`11- lez5L la, -,y 44fr-i'&00 IC;9;'.°' 41; si: 57A.4' .5-5-r-7/ Zy 2-7- /--fe /Os 4Z (74k1 G` � (-5,n N.� •-;,)•\-0-. S\ w -c (, Sq c,.�-), C 5 q/ z y , ,� a�f sY Q /J7d 5-221if�- Hervlio56 Pea G li 9 ° z 77 fes, A" ' �- 07-2 , 'd6r`4._4 4.., - % , c. -?2') is ,„5„ cu.-, 5 1 1 2 1 -Tri- Sr -- N £4I14I f 4 ✓eAell /U757X&-04.10%.*)5eQ-c.4, awcbtoe , c e . s"“ fly i -e. 0-• Oa. '7o,Lj y �d i7 Jry D /L . , �/f tc1 S � V o2 ST/L 1/44dJti /��4 C. gvz,p/ c ee u; to L eosoio ti SAF arm S-fre-1- `11e6-1 &A., c4 coasy 5 641 a4s). f-( t-vr Cc y�c1S)1 �.6 55.(1' $10^ Si- -NtinoS& ck , CA q Das(' i . Li GA , k_e-/V pvill . y 7 a y ih, s -f i I/)/ ,4 4f -c4 71/144 2-,/ Wir---- 3-75-0 z s -i- 6-47-441 o S a 4 cc, i Lto 2. sN ,deldA0&,--x- w-LiddoebiJ s -. 44---;td*--€44. i_.-._._,.....- cti7 Li -CI= 5A4 - 41-t"---. 14-r.4 C, n_5-ci /7 I. r/ C7, e. ;0=25y A 4)'--'' J4 ,,- 6�- , �( . 912s¢ at,,.:*,,,(-- tv ire,rb -' , s--- &''-', C,, . °1v `Ls`f ", _ ; v '-es'-;''r 6e:/2/111-- - 1 ,;•.if --"-V -. C4 23 Er , /6_c %. �7/Ld/vs''c . .( C� - C(G2 d'`( R, L' hcc. rot c . GLcO-4-- O2 & t 1Y. ele-it-Z -q2.9 24 ti -t. S-e4•e,E.-r Hetworc. 13 ewe.., GA 902,54 eer(l.11- 4-s QL-1114 - (S)19e1 A,Q rk tiA. - ro kamAs (;31 ( Ark Ove i-Ve 14 .os 4- - fl,A . 91)x5 4 l�a,At-64,C s33 - Zt' s-4-. idell a 6-. qQs' -109.1 - �"z0 - 0-4- 1/412/ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DATE: October 15, 1989 TO: Anthony Antich, Director of Public Works FROM: Ed Ruzak, City Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Valley Drive Sight Distance Problem ***************************************** 24th Street * ******** This letter type report reflects the analysis, findings and recommendations of a study of the subject location. The study was initiated by private Hermosa Beach citizens that are concerned with the safety problems in entering and emerging from 24th Street. They expressed concern in trying to exit 24th Street onto Valley Drive due to the limited sight lines and speed of traffic on Valley Drive. In brief, the sight distance for emerging vehicles from 24th Street is less than standard and poses a safety problem for the users on the side street as well as Valley Drive traffic. It is recommended that curb parking be removed and a shadow lane created to allow vehicles better sight distance when emerging from the cross street. This is similar to the treatment previously done at 25th Street in 1988. A total of ten (10) curb parking spaces would be removed with this proposal. SPEED AND SIGHT DISTANCE CONDITIONS The posted speed limit on Valley Drive between Gould Lane and 24th Street is 35 mph. The 85th percentile speed is 38 mph. This means that 85% of the vehicles along Valley Drive are traveling at or below 38 mph. Recognized sight distance requirements for 35 and 40 mph are as follows: Stopping Sight Distance 35 mph = 250 ft 40 mph = 300 ft Corner Sight Distance 35 mph = 385 ft 40 mph = 440 ft STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE relates to the distance that Valley Drive traffic needs to see in order to react to an object in the roadway and bring the vehicle to a stop in order to avoid striking the object. CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE is the distance a driver emerging from 24th Street needs to see in order to comfortably accelerate into the Valley Drive traffic stream. Field measurements indicate that for the southbound direction approaching 24th Street there is less than 200 feet of sight line available. This assumes the fact that curb parking is available. Without curb parking the sight lines improve to distances that exceed the Caltrans requirements. Corner sight distance at 24th Street is approximately 125 feet when curb parking is present. While speed surveys taken along Valley Drive indicate that traffic is traveling at a level that is above the posted speed limit, the sight distance is less than the standard for either the posted limit or the 85th percentile speed. ACCIDENT HISTORY A three year review of reported accidents indicates two reported collisions at the subject intersection. Neither of these involved a broadside collision. FIELD OBSERVATIONS The City traffic engineer drove through the subject intersection and negotiated the left turn from 24th Street to Valley Drive on several occasions during the A.M. (0800), mid-day (1:00) and P.M. periods (1700). There was some difficulty in entering the Valley Drive intersection as expressed by the residents, due to traffic volume, speed and limited sight lines. CURB PARKING REMOVAL Curb parking removalfrom a point 70 feet north of 24th Street to 70 feet south of 24th Street would bring the sight distance levels up to the necessary standards. A total of six (6) parking spaces would be lost to users on Valley Drive. Twenty-fourth Street is 24 feet wide. Two cars could park on the corner on both sides and there would be 8 to 9 feet of clearance. A vehicle turning into the cross streets from Valley Drive is in a position to collide with the legally parked vehicles if this condition continues. Twelve, eleven and ten foot one way traffic lanes are acceptable while a nine foot width is clearly less than desirable. This condition is a major concern to the safe operation of traffic on these streets. It would be mitigated by the curb parking removals. Curb parking removal would thus be needed for a distance of 70 feet on both sides of 24th Street west of Valley Drive. This removal results in a loss of four (4) spaces. If curb parking is removed, the pavement adjacent to the curb on the west side of Valley should be striped as a cross hatched "shadow lane". This lane would allow vehicles from Valley Drive to turn into their cross street from the curb area and avoid the potential for being rear ended as they decelerate to enter the cross street. More importantly perhaps is that the emerging vehicles from 24th Street would be able to move to a position much closer to where they could see traffic along Valley Drive. They would have to cross less of a distance to merge into the Valley Drive traffic stream and safety for all the users would be enhanced. RECOMMENDATIONS In the interest of promoting safety for all the users at the 24th Street intersection the following are recommended: 1. Remove curb parking from the west side of Valley Drive from a point 70 feet north of 24th Street to a point 70 feet south of 24th Street. This is the minimum distance along Valley Drive that parking can be removed in order to provide the maximum sight distance for the cross street. This results in a loss of six (6) parking spaces. 2. Remove curb parking from the north and south sides of 24th Street for a distance of 70 feet westerly. This results in a total loss of four (4) parking spaces. 3. Re -stripe Valley Drive with a cross hatched "shadow lane", approximately 7 feet in width. pworks/cte24st DATE: HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 540 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH CA. 90254 376-7981 1 — I— TYPE: l t 2'1/" k ( CX7LLJ NUMBER: (s9 ` OFFICER: COMMENTS / 1—F { I. ` (A : ire. 1 Ira lab 1'.'•z 4 Anthony Antic, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WOI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMI City o f 2%rmosa lrjeack. Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 (213) 318-0214 Gary Wheaton ENGINEERING TECHNICIAt PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEI City of 21ermosaTeackL Ovic Center, 1315 Valley Drive